Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC 2005-07-05 Agendas
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JULY 5, 2005 - 5:00 P.M. AGENDA The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills will hold a work session on Tuesday, July 5, 2005 at 5:00 p.m. at the North Richland Hills City Hall in the Pre-Council Room, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas. AGENDA: 1. Call to Order 2. Discuss Planning and Program of Services for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 3. Adjournment ~-~-v~~ _A . 3~ ~ ~ o _ _ cas ~ t: _ Planning and Program of Services -Fiscal Year 2005/2006 Pre-Council Chambers July 5, 2005 5:00 pm ? Information Report -Planning and Program of Services - FY 2005/2006 ? 2003/2004 Year End Fund Balances o Operating o Capital ? 2004/2005 Year-To-Date Actuals ? 2004/2005 Revised Budget o Revenues/Expenditures o Highlight Major Changes ? 2005/2006 Preliminary Budget o Preliminary Tax Roles o Preliminary Estimated Revenues & Expenditures ? Upcoming Issues o Growth in Library Materials o Reconstruction of Greens at Iron Horse o Proposed Contract with Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited, L.P. (EAGL) for Golf Course Management Services o Options for North/South Recreation Center Facilities o Natural Gas Exploration and Development o Outsourcing ? Updates o Internal Service Plan o Utility Rate Study o Long-Range Utility Capital Improvement Plan o Animal Shelter Expansion o NRHZO Strategic Master Plan o Tax Increment Reinvestment Zones 1 and 2 ? Comparison Information o Activity Levels ? Facts and Figures ? Budget Calendar INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR#2005-091 Date: July 1, 2005 Subject: Planning and Program of Services Workshop Fiscal Year 2005/2006 The purpose of this planning and program of service workshop on July 5~' is to provide the City Council information regarding the City's 2005/2006 preliminary budget, provide information on some pressing service issues and financial matters affecting our program for the next 12 to 18 months, to update Council on the planning progress of the current fiscal year and to receive any input Council may want to provide for planning next years program of services and work. The information we will present is very preliminary. The departmental expenditure requests and revenue projections for the coming year will undergo many changes before you see them again at the end of July. As mentioned, we plan to provide a general outlook for the current fiscal year as well as the coming fiscal year. We will also provide 2003/2004 year fund balances, FY 2004/2005 Revised Budget, preliminary tax roll information, preliminary revenue estimates with preliminary requested expenditures. In addition we will also review information regarding updated issues that we forsee as we continue reviewing the proposed budget. Again, the revenue estimates and expenditures are very preliminary. We expect the preliminary expenditures to be reduced significantly during management reviews. Staff will also perform further analysis of estimated revenues to insure these reflect the most accurate figures. Upon first review of the preliminary numbers, it is clear that funds will be tight in the coming fiscal year, as it has been in the current fiscal year. You will recall that last year we expressed to Council that this fiscal year coming up (FY 2005/2006) would most likely be a tough year financially as we anticipate the total removal of the Mall businesses while waiting for reconstruction. As you know the Mall is totally vacant and will be demolished this summer. This means that very few, if any, of the decision packages (expanded programs or services) proposed by departments will be considered for funding. Once again this year, departments were asked to scrutinize their operations to determine which services, if any, might be reduced in the event that reductions become necessary in order to balance the City's budget. Departments submitted these items as Minimum Service Level Packages. Taking all of the above into consideration, staff intends to place priority on goals objectives and short term action items as set forth by the City Council to insure we are still working toward meeting these needs. It is our goal to avoid employee lay-offs and service reductions for the coming year. We will however, look at all options possible to balance the budget and minimize impact on citizens and services. Thank you for taking time to meet with us and discuss these issues. The purpose of this meeting is to provide information regarding the preliminary budget as well as policy issues that will need to be considered as we move forward with our budget planning process. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS • Although we do not expect Council to make decisions during this planning workshop, we would appreciate hearing any thoughts you have at this point. Attached is the working agenda for the planning workshop. We look forward to meeting with you at 5:0_ 0 pm, Tuesday, July 5cn at the Pre-Council Room. Respectfully Submitted, Larry J. C Hingham City Manager • • Planning and Program of Services -Fiscal Year 2005/2006 Pre-Council Chambers July 5, 2005 5:00 pm Information Report -Planning and Program of Services - FY 2005/2006 2003/2004 Year End Fund Balances o Operating o Capital 2004/2005 Year-To-Date Actuals 2004/2005 Revised Budget o Revenues/Expenditures o Highlight Major Changes 2005/2006 Preliminary Budget o Preliminary Tax Roles o Preliminary Estimated Revenues & Expenditures - Upcoming Issues • o Growth in Library Materials o Reconstruction of Greens at Iron Horse o Proposed Contract with Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited, L.P. (EAGL) for Golf Course Management Services o Options for North/South Recreation Center Facilities o Natural Gas Exploration and Development o Outsourcing Updates o Internal Service Plan o Utility Rate Study o Long-Range Utility Capital Improvement Plan o Animal Shelter Expansion o NRH2O Strategic Master Plan o Tax Increment Reinvestment Zones 1 and 2 Comparison Information o Activity Levels Facts and Figures ~ Budget Calendar • INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR#2005-091 Date: July 1, 2005 Subject: Planning and Program of Services Workshop Fiseal Year 2005/2006 The purpose of this planning and program of service workshop on July 5th is to provide the City Council information regarding the City's 2005/2006 preliminary budget, provide information on some pressing service issues and financial matters affecting our program for the next 12 to 18 months, to update Council on the planning progress of the current fiscal year and to receive any input Council may want to provide for planning next years program of services and work. The information we will present is very preliminary. The departmental expenditure requests and revenue projections for the coming year will undergo many changes before you see them again at the end of July. As mentioned, we plan to provide a general outlook for the current fiscal year as well as the coming fiscal year. We will also provide 2003/2004 year fund balances, FY 2004/2005 Revised Budget, preliminary tax roll information, preliminary revenue estimates with preliminary requested expenditures. In addition we will also review information regarding updated issues that we forsee as we continue reviewing the proposed budget. Again, the revenue estimates and expenditures are very preliminary. We expect the preliminary expenditures to be reduced significantly during management reviews. Staff will also perform further analysis of estimated revenues to insure these reflect the most accurate figures. Upon first review of the preliminary numbers, it is clear that funds will be tight in the coming fiscal year, as it has been in the current fiscal year. You will recall that last year we expressed to Council that this fiscal year coming up (FY 2005/2006) would most likely be a tough year financially as we anticipate the total removal of the Mall businesses while waiting for reconstruction. As you know the Mall is totally vacant and will be demolished this summer. This means that very few, if any, of the decision packages (expanded programs or services) proposed by departments will be considered for funding. Once again this year, departments were asked to scrutinize their operations to determine which services, if any, might be reduced in the event that reductions become necessary in order to balance the City's budget. Departments submitted these items as Minimum Service Level Packages. Taking all of the above into consideration, staff intends to place priority on goals objectives and short term action items as set forth by the City Council to insure we are still working toward meeting these needs. It is our goal to avoid employee lay-offs and service reductions for the coming year. We will however, look at all options possible to balance the budget and minimize impact on citizens and services. Thank you for taking time to meet with us and discuss these issues. The purpose of this meeting is to provide information regarding the preliminary budget as well as policy issues that will need to be considered as we move forward with our budget planning process. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Although we do not expect Council to make decisions during this planning workshop, we would appreciate hearing any thoughts you have at this point. Attached is the working agenda for the planning workshop. We look forward to meeting with you at 5:00 pm, Tuesday, July Stn at the Pre-Council Room.. Respectfully Submitted, Larry J. C nningham City Manager • ~ I ~ { f~ ~ i i I t AS,- .~,~~Ls ~ E ~C T L~. FOCAL ~ ~ Kainr~ ~ crucia6 ~or ~ca6 ~overnmert~ • e ea e a an~e ocal governments plan their operating budgets around expenditures necessary for government business. But not having sufficient funds to cover expenditures cause headaches for local government officials. Denton County's health insurance, for ex- Re52rVdt10115 feCOnl(ilended ample, has doubled since ?001 and worker's compensation has increased four times A fund balance is the net financial re- in three years, according to James Wells, sources available in a governmental fund; county auditor in Denton County. At the that is, the difference between the assets same time, the county experienced reduced and liabilities reported in that fund. This prisoner housing and investment revenue. fund balance is further divided into re- Having money set aside, however-a served fund balance and unreserved fund "rainy day fund," to some-can help lessen balance. Reserved fund balances have the Ulow when unexpected expenses arise. already been budgeted for a particular purpose. Unreserved fund balances are the - remaining funds available for spending if / f necessary to liquidate current liabilities. Brightening up rainy days ? ~ This amount is sometimes called a rainy ~ day fund, which can help a local govern- Eve da expenditures and emer ender alike rl' Y 9 ment avoid a financial crisis in the event plague governments when adequate funds are not of unexpected revenue shortfalls or unpre- available.The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities dieted expenditures. recommends governments establish and strengthen their ~ It also protects against, having to reduce rainy day fund policies by: ~ service levels or raise taxes and fees during • creating rainy day funds; difficult times and also provides the flex- • increasing or removing rainy day fund caps; ibility to respond to unexpected opportuni- • improving rainy day fund deposit rules; ties. In addition, the rainy day fund balance • eliminating difficult replenishment rules; and is a consideration in bond ratings. Credit, • removing limits on legitimate use. rating agencies carefully monitor the level of fund balances and unreserved fund balances in a government's general fund when evaluating that government's creditworthiness. Continued on page 8 c- Cash flow is another reason for maintaining In 2002, the Government Finance Officers reserves. Most property taxes are collected Association (GFOA) issued a recommendation from December through February, a time when providing Guidelines to local governments on sales tax revenues peak as well. Even though the amount of general fwlds that should be some local governments have overall balanced kept; in reserve, as well as other recommended budgets for the year, they may need t:o borrow policies components. ~ money early in the fiscal year, anticipating GFOA recommends that governments estab- ~ these future revenues, to pay payroll and other lish a formal policy on the level of unreserved ~ general operating expenditures. Maintaining fund balance that should be maintained in the an adequate fund balance can prevent or re- general i'und as well as other types of govern- I duce the need for this kind of costly short-term meat funds. borrowing. The policy, according to GFOA, should in- GFOA recommends El Paso County's bond rating increased from elude a chronological implementation plan, that ,gouer•nments AA-minus in 1992 to Al in 2002, due in large specific plans for increasing or decreasing the part to the county's increase in undesignated level of unreserved funds as needed and crite- maintain, at a reserves, according to El Paso County Auditor ria for spending. These policies should be pub- miniinum, 5 to 15 Edward Dion. licly available and summarized in budgets and percent of regular "The Al rating reflects the county's growing other planning and management reports. economic base, well-managed financial opera- Denton County's rainy day fund had de- ,geiaeral fu~zd, tions characterized by ample reserves and a creased significantly since 2001 and their bond operating re~e~tues manageable debt position," he said. rating reflected it, Wells said. County officials Further, the county adopted a policy with a worked to increase this ratio and now have a undesignated general fund balance goal of 5 to formal policy with a target level for unreserved 15 percent of operations. general fund balances of 12 percent of bud- geted general fund balances. Up to the locals Local governments should establish an un- Texashas no statutory requirements for the reserved fund balance requirement based on unreserved general fund balances of either the their specific circumstances. GFOA recom- state or local governments. Local governments mends that governments maintain, at a mini- may have legal requirements of their own, but un- mum, 5 to 15 percent of regular general fund ti12002 had no guidelines to assist in the estab- operating revenues, or no less than one to two lishment of required unreserved fund balances. months (8 to 16 percent) of regular general fund operating expenditures. Astable state The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, H e I pf U I I] I IltS a privately funded research group, encourages state governments to strengthen state reserve Local governments all face unique challenges in their annual budgeting. The Government policies and to rebuild any depleted state re- Finance Officers Association recommends a few basic guidelines for planning for surprise serve funds. expenditures. Texas established its Economic Stabilization Fund (ESF) by constitutional amendment in - Predictability of revenue: Higher levels of reserves may be needed when significant 1988. It became effective September 1, 1989. revenue sources are subject to unpredictable fluctuations. It is primarily funded with 75 percent of the • Volatility of expenses: Higher levels of reserves may be needed when expenses are amount by which oil and gas tax collections likely to vary dramatically. in any year exceed 1987 collections and half • Available resources from other funds: The availability of resources in otherfunds of any unencumbered general revenue surplus may reduce the amount of resources needed in the general fund, just as deficits at the end of each biennium. The amount in in other funds may require that a higher level of resources be maintained in the the ESF is capped at 10 percent of the general general fund. revenue income during the previous biennium. A three-fifths vote in both houses is required • Liquidity: A disparity between when financial to a ppropriate money in the fund. There is no resources actually become available to make required balance. payments and the due dates of related ~ Texas is rebuilding its rainy day fund, and as liabilities may require maintaining a of January 2005, the ESF contained $831 million, higher level of resources. ~ 'L'- or 3 percent of the general appropriations. The • Designations: Governments may wish to ~ ~ Comptroller estimates the fisca12007 ending maintain higher levels of resources to cash balance in the economic stabilization Fund at about $2 billion. If the Senate passes the 007 compensate for any portion of unreserved appropriations bill already passed by the House fund balance already designated fora t ~ of Representatives, the ESF should be at 6 per- spetificpurpose. cent of expenditures by the end of fisca12007. ~ Source: Government Finance Officers Association. Donna Keel and Clint Shields FUND DEFINITIONS General Fund The General Fund is used to account for all revenues and expenditures not accounted for in other funds. The General Fund is primarily supported by property taxes, general sales taxes, franchise fees, license and permit fees, recreation fees and municipal court fines. General Fund expenditures support the functions of streets, traffic, planning, inspections, culture and leisure, communications, public safety and administrative services. Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds are similar to business operations and their operations are supported by the revenues they generate. Utility Fund -fund balance in this fund is generally restricted for utility construction, rate stabilization and required debt service reserves. Golf Course -fund balance in this fund is restricted for required debt service reserve and used for golf course projects. A9uatic Park -fund balance in this fund is used for water park purposes • Internal Service Funds Internal service funds function solely to support other departments operations within the City organization. Revenues for these funds are from "user charges" to City departments that use each service. Building Services Fund -fund balance in this fund is restricted for current and future capital projects for replacements of heating and air conditioning systems, roof replacements, floor covering replacements, major renovations of existing buildings, and other major work not normally defined as regular building maintenance. ? Equipment Services Fund -fund balance in this fund is restricted for current and future equipment purchases including, cars, trucks, police cars, fire equipment, and large major pieces of equipment. ? Self Insurance Fund -fund balance in this fund is restricted for future medical claims. It is a contingency to be used in case of an extraordinary year in which medical claims exceed expectations. Information Services Fund -fund balance in this fund is restricted for future technology needs, replacement of major computer systems, and major upgrades of technology. • • Special Revenue Funds Special revenue funds are used to account for the proceeds of legally restricted revenue sources and is spent only for the specified purposes. Promotional Fund -revenues for this fund are generated from hotel/motel taxes. They are to be used for tourism, visitor programs and promoting/advertising the city. Donations Fund -revenues for this fund are primarily generated from contributions made through the monthly utility bills. Amounts that are donated are restricted to be used for the specific purposes that were intended such as public art, the Library, the Animal Adoption and Rescue Center, etc. ? Special Investigation Fund -revenues for this fund are mainly from reimbursements received from other cities that participate in the Police radio, Mobile Data Terminal (MDT) and Automated Fingerprint Identification System (APIs) programs as well as funds that have been seized by the Police Department and are released to the City by a Judge. Seized funds can only be used for specific purposes and the reimbursements this fund receives go toward the cost of the radio, MDT and AFIS programs. ? Drainage Utility Fund -revenues for this fund are from the drainage utility fee which is levied against all developed property within the city limits and is included on the monthly utility bill. These revenues can be spent only on • drainage projects or to pay debt that has been issued for drainage projects. ? Park Development Fund -revenues for this fund are mainly from sales taxes. This revenue can only be spent for very specific purposes that are outlined in the 4-B sales tax law. The fund balance in this fund is reserved for future park capital projects and economic development. ? Crime Control District -revenues for this fund are mainly from sales taxes. This revenue can be spent only for specific purposes dealing with police department activities. The fund balance is restricted for future use as a transition fund only for police purposes if the proposition does not pass when it is time to reauthorize the Crime Control District. • FUND SUMMARY Audited FY 2004 FY 2004 Audited Fund Ending Balance General Fund (undesignated) $ 7,087,107 General Fund Designated for Economic Development $ 3,000,000 Promotional Fund (HotellMotel Tax) $ 193,398 Donations Fund (from water bills) $ 356,962 Special Investigation Fund Cash (Police Activities, i.e. DEA funds) $ 338,104 Drainage Utility Fund $ 271,230 Park Development Fund Reserved for Park Capital Projects (Parks Development Long Range Plan) $ 6,669,782 Crime Control District Transition Reserve $ 3,321,556 General Debt Service Fund $ 1,923,181 FUND SUMMARY Audited FY 2004 FY 2004 Audited Fund Ending Balance Water and Sewer Utility Fund Operating Cash $ 1,480,043 Water & Sewer Utility Fund Restricted Cash for Construction, Rate Stabilization, Debt Reserve and other Cash Balances $ 11,537,978 Golf Course Fund Operating and Debt Service Cash Balances $ 598,632 Aquatic Park: Cash Reserved for Infrastructure Maintenance & Operations $ 1,162,708 Cash Reserved for Park Insurance $ 550,000 Cash Reserved for Debt Service $ 288,843 Construction Fund for approved Capital Projects $ 102,226 Aquatic Park Cash from Operations Reserved for Infrastructure Maintenance, Debt Service, Insurance Liability & Construction in Progress $ 2,103,777 FUND SUMMARY Audited FY 2004 FY 2004 Audited Fund Ending Balance Building Services Cash Reserved for City Facility Upkeep (includes CIP) $ 1,657,745 Equipment Services Cash Reserved for the Replacement of City Equipment $ 1,992,737 Insurance Fund Cash Reserved for Administration, Claims & Premiums $ 249,317 _ _ - Information Services Fund Cash Reserved for Equipment Replacement $ 1,898,527 Capital Project Funds Balances • Not Committed to Specific Projects Fund Current Balance Street Funds Project Savings and Interest Earnings Undesignated Balance (eligible for street projects only) $ 800 Drainage Funds Project Savings and Interest Earnings Undesignated Balance (eligible for drainage projects only) ' $ 886,924 Pay-As-You-Go Reserve $ 705,512 Miscellaneous Capital Reserves (eligible for all types of capital projects) $ 541,826 Funds to be reimbursed from 2006 G.O. bond sale projects: Streets $195,000; Drainage $200,000. INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 2005-079 Date: June 13, 2005 Subject: Revenue and Expenditure Report for Eight Months Ended May 31, 2005 The Revenue and Expenditure Report for the eight months ended May 31, 2005 is attached for your review. An overall summary sheet of each fund is presented to provide an overview of the first eight months of fiscal year 2005. The more detailed revenue and expenditure reports follow the summary. Please note that some estimates are used, for example, in sales tax receipts for May. We believe these estimates to be reasonable and reflect a conservative picture of the City's financial status at this time. For comparison purposes, fiscal year 2004 year-end and year-to-date actual figures are presented. GENERAL FUND Total revenues in the General Fund through May were $25,064,411 an increase of $564,812 compared with the same time in fiscal year 2004. Some revenue highlights for fiscal year 2005 include: 1. Current Property Tax collections for the year were $10,085,342 or 99.04% of budget, compared with $9,524,298 for the same period last year. This represents the majority of property tax receipts. 2. Sales Tax revenues totaled $5,015,474 for the year compared to $5,394,528 in fiscal year 2004, a decrease of $379,054. Year end sales tax revenues are anticipated to be $360,000 below budget. We have instituted a contingency plan that will offset this decrease. These changes will be reflected in the FY 2004-05 Revised Budget in August. Sales Tax Collections ss,ooo,ooo 55,000,000 a4,ooo,ooo sa,ooo,ooo ss,ooo,ooo a~,ooo,ooo Thru May 2004 Thru May 2005 ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 3. Fines and Forfeiture revenues were $1,136,288 for the first eight months of fiscal year 2005. This was a $17,582, or a 1.5% decrease from this time period in fiscal year 2004. The majority of this decrease is due to patrol officer vacancies and to an • increase in time served credit. 4. Licenses and Permit revenue collections totaled $1,076,941, a $60,033 increase from prior year levels at this time. The increase is due to revenue increases in miscellaneous permits, building permits, plumbing and electrical permits. There are decreases in revenues such as paving inspections and plan review/application fees. These two revenues are down because of several large developments that were reviewed by City staff early in the prior fiscal year. Licenses ~ Permit Revenues s~,2oo,000 s~,ooo,ooo - 3soo,ooo ssoo,ooo saoo,ooo s2oo,o00 so Thru May 2004 Thru May 2005 Overall, General Fund ex enditures for the first ei ht months of fiscal ear 2005 totaled P 9 Y $21,187,641 or 65.39% of budget. This includes encumbrances from the prior fiscal year in all departments. Encumbrances are items that were approved by Council in the prior year, but actually purchased, paid for and completed in the current fiscal year. PROMOTIONAL FUND Occupancy taxes collected through May 2005 totaled $97,324 compared to $90,718 forthe same period last year. Occupancy taxes are due on a quarterly basis and are paid by the end of the month following each quarter. Revenues from all other sources in this fund totaled $2,662 this year compared to $2,682 in FY 2004. Economic Development expenditures are 59.44% of budget including prior year encumbrances. As mentioned above, these are items that were approved by Council in the prior year, but actually purchased, paid for, and completed in the current fiscal year. DONATIONS FUND Donations Fund revenues for the first eight months of fiscal year 2005 were $205,289 compared to $130,271 last fiscal year. The increase in Donations Fund revenues as of May 31, 2005 is due to $55,805 in donations collected for the Liberty Park public art project. Expenditures totaled $99,177 or 53.10% of budget. General Public Improvement expenditures are $71,892 as of the end of May mainly due to expenditures for the Liberty Park public art project. 2 PARK & RECREATIONAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND Sales tax revenues in the Park Development Fund totaled $2,507,735 compared to • $2,697,264 for FY 2004. Tennis Center revenues totaled $146,250, compared to $174,609 collected last year, a 19% decrease. This is due to the loss of two tennis professionals who took some of their private lesson clientele with them to new employment, and also to the rainy and cold months of October, November and December. Operating expenditures were $1,365,189, or 57.52% of budget. CRIME CONTROL DISTRICT Sales tax revenues in the Crime Control District totaled $2,414,993 compared to $2,585,645 in fiscal year 2004. Operating and capital expenditures totaled 57.79% of budget. UTILITY FUND Revenues in the Utility Fund were $12,339,088 through May compared to $12,220,746 in FY 2004. interest income is up this year due to higher interest rates this year compared to last year. Operating expenses were $9,921,733 compared to $9,082,981 in FY 2004. This increase is primarily due to higher water purchases and previous year electricity encumbrances. As mentioned above, encumbrances are items that were approved by Council in the prior year, but actually purchased, paid for and completed in the current fiscal year. • AQUATIC PARK FUND Aquatic Park revenues were $457,105 compared to $241,837 in FY 2004. This is an increase of $215,268 from prior year levels, which is due to collection of previous year consignment sales after the close of the 2003/04 fiscal year. Also, advance and group sales are about $123,000 higher compared to last year at this time. Aquatic Park revenues and expenditures are low compared to budget early in the fiscal year before the park actually opens. Operating expenses totaled $843,627 which is 30.24% of budget. GOLF COURSE FUND Total rounds of golf through May 31, 2005 were 28,516 this year compared to 29,358 last year. Total revenues through May were $1,285,559 compared to $1,388,243 in FY 2004, a decrease of $102,684, which is due to the loan from the pay-as-you-go reserve in fiscal year 2003/04. Total operating expenses and capital outlay were $886,903 compared to $1,003,231 in FY 2004. Cost of goods sold through May was $154,910 compared to $142,300 for FY 2004. EQUIPMENT & BUILDING SERVICES FUNDS Equipment Services and Building Services operating expenses for the first eight months of fiscal year 2005 were within budget parameters. 3 SELF-INSURANCE FUND Insurance Fund claims, operating expenses, reserves and premiums were $4,645,923 • which is 67.38% of budget and approximately $688,045 more than May 2004. The insurance plan changes took affect beginning January 2005, and in this new plan employees share a larger portion of the cost. Therefore, the increased claims cost will be offset by the increased employee premiums. Insurance Fund Expenses 35,000,000 54,500,000 54,000,000 33,500,000 53,000,000 52,500,000 32,000,000 51,500,000 Thru May 2004 Thru May 2005 • INFORMATION SERVICES FUND Operating expenses m the Information Services Fund were within budget parameters for the first eight months of fiscal year 2005. Included in current year expenditures are prior fiscal year encumbrances. As mentioned above, these are items that were approved by Council in the prior year, but actually purchased, paid for and completed in the current fiscal year. SUMMARY This financial report reflects activity for the first eight months of fiscal year 2005. Revenues and cash flows are within budgeted parameters, and expenditures are also within budget parameters and reasonable compared to the prior year levels. Staff will continue to monitor financial trends to ensure that goals are met and cash flows are maximized to meet operational needs. Respectfully submitted, Karen R. Bostic Managing Director of Administrative/Fiscal Services • 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS MONTHLY BUDGET REPORT May 2005 • 1. Schedule -All Funds Summary i-ii GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS 2. General Fund (a) Revenues 1-2 (b) Expenditures 3 3. Promotional Fund (a) Revenues & Expenditures 4 4. Donations Fund (a) Revenues and Expenditures 5 5. Park & Recreation Facilities Development Fund (a) Revenues & Expenditures 6 6. Crime Control and Prevention District Fund (a) Revenues & Expenditures 7 PROPRIETARY FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDS 7. Utilitx Fund (a) Revenues 8 (b) Expenditures 9 8. Aquatic Park Enterprise Fund (a) Revenues & Expenditures 10 9. Golf Course Fund 11 (a) Revenues & Expenditures INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 10. Equipment Services (a) Revenues & Expenditures 12 Building Services (a) Revenues & Expenditures 13 11. Insurance Fund (a) Revenues & Expenditures 14 12. Information Services Fund (a) Revenues & Expenditures 15 ' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS INTERIM SCHEDULE OF REVENUES 8, EXPENDITURES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 EIGHT MONTHS (66.67%) OF FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED 2004/05 ADOPTED 2004/05 2004/05 2003/04 2003/04 2003/04 FUND BUDGET To Date % Budget Total To Date %Actual General Fund Revenues $32,429,541 $25,064,411 77.29% $32,051,206 $24,499,599 76.44% Expenditures (32,403,566) (21,187,641) 65.39% (31,163,332) (19,383,262) 62.20% Net Balance $25,975 $3,876,770 $887,874 $5,116,336 Promotional Fund Revenues $261,423 $132,536 50.70% $225,799 $126,646 56.09% Expenditures (261,423? (155,377) 59.44% (232,043) { 149,869} 64.59% Net Balance $0 ($22,841) ($6,244} r ($23,223) Donations Fund Revenues $269,746 $205,289 76.10% $656,706 $130,271 19.84% Expenditures ($186,786} (99,177) 53.10% 4571,150) (13,385} 2.34% Net Balance $82,960 $106,112 $85,556 $116,886 Park Facilities Devlp. fund Revenues $4,479,305 $2,810,730 62.75% $4,574,293 $3,016,674 65.95% Expenditures ($4,479,305) {2,810,730) 62.75% (4,574,293) (3,016,674} 65.95% Balance $0 _ $0 $0 $0 Crime Control District Revenues $4,893,012 $3,094,356 63.24% $4,898,840 $3,064,723 62.55% Expenditures ($4,893,012) (3,094,357} 63.24% (4,898,840) (3,064,723) 62.56% Net Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 Pagei ' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS INTERIM SCHEDULE OF REVENUES 8, EXPENDITURES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 EIGHT MONTHS (66.67%) OF FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED 2004!05 ADOPTED 2004/05 2004/05 2003/04 2003/04 2003/04 ~!D BUDGET To Date % Budget Total To Date % Actual Utility Fund Revenues $20,269,321 $12,339,088 60.88% $19,769,597 $12,220,746 61.82% Expenditures ($20,269,321) (12,339,087? 60.88% (19,769,597) ($12,220,746) 61.82% Net Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 Aquatic Park fund Revenues $3,737,720 $457,105 12.23% $3,062,085 $328,477 8.25% Expenditures ($3,737,720) (1,473,775) 39.43% (3,568,914) (1,596,277) 44.73% Net Balance $0 ($l ($506,829? ($1,267,799} Golf Course Fund Revenues $2,223,907 $1,130,649 50.84% $2,228,329 $1,321,694 59.31% Expenses ($2,223,907? ($1,317,854) 59.26% ($2,228,329) ($1,412,465) 63.39% Net Balance $0 ($187,205) $0 ($90,771) Eauioment Services Revenues $2,540,882 $1,692,544 66.61% $2,061,950 $1,370,822 66.48% Expenses ($2,540,882) (1,692,544) 66.61% (2,061,950? (1,370,822) 66.48% t Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 uildina Services Revenues $1,731,042 $1,165,968 67.36% $1,716,581 $1,144,426 66.67% Expenses ($1,731,042) (1,165,968) 67.36% (1,716,581) (1,144,425) 66.67% Net Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 Self-Insurance Fund Revenues $6,894,745 $4,645,923 67.38% $5,989,382 $3,957,878 66.08% Expenses ($6,894,745? (4,645,923? 67.38% (6,367,554) (3,957,878} 62.1 b% Net Balance $0 ($378,172) $0 Information Services fund Revenues $2,360,903 $1,625,632 68.86% $2,471,886 $1,637,410 66.24% Expenses ($2,360,903) { 1,625,632) 68.86% (2,471,886) (1,637,410) 66.24% Net Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 Page ii ' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GENERAL FUND REVENUES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 • /---------FISCAL YEAR 2004105 /-------FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 ADOPTED COLLECTED % TOTAL COLLECTED % BUDGET AS OF 5/05 BUDGET COLLECTIONS AS OF 5/04 ACTUAL TAXES Current Property Taxes $10,183,013 $10,085,342 99.04% $9,720,352 $9,524,298 97.98% Delinquent Property Taxes 142,050 200,544 141.18% 280,075 160,447 57.29% Penalty and Interest 98,483 1 15,874 1 17.66% 160,925 85,350 53.04% Franchise Taxes 3,443,000 2,834,280 82.32% 3,592,682 2,889,091 80.42% Utility Fund Franchise Taxes 595,942 348,749 58.52% 558,976 345,168 61.75% Sales Taxes 8,204,423 5,015,474 61.13% 8,197,654 5,394,528 65.81% Mixed Beverages 110,000 85,062 77.33% 107,164 78,720 73.46% Payment in Lieu of Taxes 298,385 198,933 66.67% 318,856 212,581 66.67% TOTAL TAXES $23,075,246 $18,884,258 81.84% $22,936,684 $18,690,183 81.49% FINES AND FORFEITURES Municipal Court Fines $1,426,080 $931,614 65.33% $1,519,515 $958,267 63.06% Library Fines 58,000 39,990 68.95% 60,561 35,738 59.01 Warrant & Arrest Fees 244,000 164,684 67.49% 234,093 159,865 68.29% TOTAL FINES & FORFEITURES $1,728,080 $1,136,288 65.75% $1,814,169 $1,153,870 63.60% LICENSES AND PERMITS Miscellaneous Permits $188,500 $120,678 64.02% $176,518 $107,972 61.17% Building Permits 630,000 476,705 75.67% 669,572 369,362 55.16% Electrical Permits 60,000 43,014 71.69% 57,946 34,984 60.37% tubing Permits 68,000 52,634 77,40% 72,925 45,207 61.49%, ing Inspections 121,000 34,958 28.89% 100,192 72,891 72.75% Re-Inspection Fees 12,000 10,930 91.08% 17,940 12,400 69.12% License Fees 12,000 12,764 106.37% 15,500 13,895 89.65% Contractor Registration Fees 84,000 50,510 60.13% 83,334 56,600 67.92% Plan Review/Application Fee 89,000 38,1 b3 42.88% 94,275 62,474 66.27% Animal License Fees 15,540 1 1,504 74.03% 16,250 10,793 66.42% Animal Adoption Fees 64,000 28,612 44.71% 55,829 40,689 72.88% Animal Impound Fees 53,500 53,871 100.69% 56,163 37,085 66.03% Crematorium Revenues 4,500 742 16.49% 5,021 3,717 74.03% Auto Impoundment Fees 0 6,644 100.00% 15,371 9,186 59.76% Food Service Permits 91,000 97,990 107.68% 1 Ol ,660 98,010 96.41% Food Managers Schoo{ 13,000 10,552 81.17% 15,720 10,535 67.02% Fire Inspection Fees 17,000 8,763 51.55% 20,132 13,879 68.94% Publicity Fees -Recreation 33,100 17,907 54.10% 32,099 17,229 53.67% TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS $1,556,140 $1,076,941 69,21% $1,606,447 $1,016,908 63.30% Page 1 • CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ' GENERAL FUND REVENUES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 /------FISCAL YEAR 2004J05----------/ /------FISCAL YEAR 2003/04----------/ ADOPTED COLLECTED % TOTAL COLLECTED BUDGET AS OF 5/05 BUDGET COLLECTIONS AS OF 5/04 BUDGET CHARGES FOR SERVICE Park Facility Rental $3,450 $3,458 100.23% $6,620 $3,579 54.06% Ambulance Fees 960,000 549,359 57.22% 932,246 527,113 56.54% Garbage Billing 230,000 134,591 58.52% 235,236 137,496 58.45% Maps & Codes 300 22 7.33% 126 126 100.00% Recreation Revenue 487,606 230,546 47.28% 351,536 208,028 59.18% Athletic Revenue 112,255 46,897 41.78% 86,619 48,048 55.47% Recreation Special Events 11,530 17,288 149.94% 22,081 8,586 38.88% Planning 8, Zoning Fees 30,000 24,745 82.48% 30,364 21,700 71.47% Sale of Accident Reports 25,000 16,076 64.30% 27,619 18,230 66.01% Vital Statistics 53,000 36,501 68.87% 56,676 33,571 59.23% Mowing 18,000 5,172 28.73% 16,811 14,551 86.56% Contributions 10,000 10,000 100.00% 10,000 10,000 100.00% Citicable 1,000 16 1.60% 525 525 100.00% TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE $1,942,141 $1,074,671 55.33% $1,776,459 $1,031,553 58.07% INTERGOVERNMENTAL Indirect Cost -General CIP $155,000 $103,339 66.67% $105,000 $70,004 66.67% Indirect Cost -Utility Fund 1,283,271 855,557 66.67% 1,222,163 814,816 66.67% Indirect Cost -Park/Rec. Corp. 253,659 169,114 66.67% 241,582 161,063 66.67% Indirect Costs -CCD 401,942 267,975 66.67% 401,942 267,975 66.67% ~rect Cost - NRH2O 94,588 63,062 66.67% 90,084 60,059 66.67% ct Cost -CCD 1,092,425 728,320 66.67% 1,103,460 735,677 66.67% TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL $3,280,885 $2.187,366 66.67% $3,164,231 $2,109,593 66.67% MISCELLANEOUS Interest Income $83,500 $209,406 250.79% $66,181 $47,336 71.53% Grant Proceeds-CDBG 25,000 36,500 146.00% 49,874 49,874 100.00% Criminal Justice Grants 79,000 0 0.00% 0 (13,909) -100.00% Sale of City Property 0 0 0.00% 3,286 0 0.00% Other Income 249,784 186,090 74.50% 1 18,71 1 70,726 59.58% Appropriation of Fund Balance 347,250 231,512 66.67% 451,519 301,028 66.67% Overtime Reimbursement -Police 9,800 6,267 63.95% 8,568 5,717 66.73% Drainage fund Contribution 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Special Invest. Fund Loan Reimb. 52,665 35,112 66.67% 55,077 36,720 66.67% TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS $846,999 $704,886 83.22% $753,216 $497,492 66.05% TOTAL REVENUES $32,429,541 $25,064,411 77.29% $32,051,206 $24,499,599 76.44% Page 2 • CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ' GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES FOR THE EIGNT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 /------FISCAL YEAR 2004/05------------/ /----------FISCAL YEAR 2003/04--- --J ADOPTED EXPENDITURES % TOTAL EXPENDITURES % OF TOTAL BUDGET AS OF 5/05 BUDGET EXPENDITURES AS OF 5/04 EXPENDITURES DEPARTMENT: City Council $159,615 $56,184 35.20% $157,044 $99,921 63.63% City Manager 486,165 338,459 69.62% 501,894 307,577 61.28% Communications 487,279 276,394 56.72% 475,648 318,297 66.92% City Secretary 426,846 319,143 74.77% 454,524 254,926 56.09% Legal 500,033 331,554 66.31% 637,012 327,790 51.46% Human Resources 111,576 67,501 60.50% 99,506 64,729 65.05% Finance 756,933 469,609 62.04% 733,335 466,928 63.67% Budget & Research 313,069 203,593 65.03% 315,230 196,667 62.39% Municipal Court 1,021,482 671,518 65.74% 993,477 616,269 62.03% Inspections 644,824 405,070 62.82% 585,520 360,776 61.62% Planning 233,398 134,986 57.84% 233,809 162,1 10 69.33% Economic Development 100,787 66,676 66.16% 95,477 54,712 57.30% Library 1,479,744 1,000,124 67.59% 1,457,168 950,325 65.22% ~hborhood Services 1,348,558 803,233 59.56% 1,262,090 805,477 63.82% Public Works 2,579,1 16 1,579,371 61.24% 2,278,244 1,465,035 64.31 Parks and Recreation 2,422,296 1,489,643 61.50% 2,346,225 1,465,819 62.48% Police 8,799,788 5,677,599 64.52% 8,540,424 5,343,258 62.56% Fire 7,890,793 5,023,510 63.66% 7,330,422 4,722,928 64.43% Building Services 787,377 524,944 66.67% 845,121 563,442 66.67% Non-Departmental 1,056,637 1,217,003 115.18% 1,271,162 469,591 36.94%, Permanent Street/Sidewalk 300,000 200,010 66.67% 0 0 0.00% Maintenance Self-Insurance Fund 347,250 231,512 66.67% 0 0 0.00% Bui{ding Services Fund 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Reserve for Capital Improvements 150,000 100,005 66.67% 550,000 366,685 66.67% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $32,403,566 $21,187,641 65.39% $31,163,332 $19,383,262 62.20% NET BALANCE $25,975 $3,876,770 $887,874 $5,116,336 Page 3 ' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PROMOTIONAL FUND REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 \----FISCAL YEAR 2004/05--____\ \______FISCAL YEAR 2003/04 \ ADOPTED REV/EXP % TOTAL REV/EXP % BUDGET AS OF 5/OS BUDGET REV/EXP AS OF 5/04 ACTUAL REVENUES Occupancy Taxes $210,000 $97,324 46.34% $172,198 $90,718 52.68% Other Income 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Sale of History Books 600 40 6.67% 360 360 100.00% Interest Income 2,000 2,622 131.10% 3,374 2,322 68.82% TOTAL REVENUES $212,600 $99,986 47.03% $175,932 $93,400 53.09% Appropriation of Fund Balance $48,823 $32,550 66.67% $49,867 $33,246 66.67% TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES $2bl ,423 $132,536 50.70% $225,799 $126,646 56.09% EXPENDITURES Economic Development $261,423 $155,377 59.44% $232,043 $149,869 64.59% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $261,423 $155,377 59.44% $232,043 $149,869 64.59% NET BALANCE $0 ($22,841) ($6,244) ($23,223) Page 4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ' DONATIONS FUND REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 \------FISCAL YEAR 2004/05-----\ \-----FISCAL YEAR 2003/04----\ ADOPTED REV/EXP % TOTAL REV/EXP BUDGET AS OF 5/05 BUDGET REV/EXP AS OF 5/04 ACTUAL REVENUES Contributions from Water Bills $121,910 $92,036 75.50% $126,415 $86,399 68.35% Interest {ncome 6,600 6,590 99.85% 7,065 4,677 66.20% Other Income 31,800 66,584 209.38% 18,323 10,912 59.55% Trinity Waste Donation 25,000 15,000 60.00% 15,000 15,000 100.00% Critter Connection Revenue 2,060 2,823 137.04% 2,278 1,105 48.51% Shelter Donations/Contributions 9,376 12,898 137.56% 7,487 1,326 17.71% Donations-Spay/Neuter Program 8,000 1,026 12.83% 12,159 10,429 85.77% Transmitter Lease Income 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Appropriation of Fund Balance 60,000 8,095 13.49% 465,914 0 0.00% Sale of Books -Library 5,000 237 4.74% 2,065 423 20.48% TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES $269,746 $205,289 76.10% $656,706 $130,271 19.84% EXPENDITURES Library $70,000 $95 0.14% $52,437 $1 0.00% Spay/Neuter Services 0 0 0.00% 6,475 2,331 36.00% Humane Services Capital 60,000 8,095 13.49% 465,914 0 0.00% Advertising 3,016 1,984 65.78% 2,695 1,800 66.79% Critter Connection 22,270 1,744 7.83% 11,433 2,911 25.46% Keep NRH Beautiful 15,000 15,367 102.45% 15,000 1,540 10.27% General Public Improvement 16,500 71,892 435.71% 17,146 4,802 27.93% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $186,786 $99,177 53.10% $571,150 $13,385 2.34% NET BALANCE $82,960 $106,112 $85,556 $116,886 • Page 5 ' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PARK & RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 \ -FISCAL YEAR 2004/05-------\ \----FISCAL YEAR 2003/04-----\ ADOPTED REV/EXP % TOTAL REV/EXP BUDGET AS OF 5/05 BUDGET REV/EXP AS OF 5/04 ACTUAL REVENUES Sales Tax $4,061,595 $2,507,735 61.74% $4,098,828 $2,697,264 65.81% Tennis Center Revenue 327,510 146,250 44.66% 292,374 174,609 59.72% Youth Assn. Maintenance Fees 28,000 5,951 21.25% 28,798 9,060 31.46% Other Income 0 0 0.00% 2,093 0 0.00% Grant Proceeds 0 105,989 100.00% 96,089 96,089 100.00% Interest Income 62,200 44,805 72.03% 56,111 39,652 70.67% TOTAL REVENUES $4,479,305 $2,810,730 62.75% $4,574,293 $3,016,674 65.95% Appropriation of Prior Year $0 $0 0.00% $0 $0 0.00% TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES $4,479,305 $2,810,730 62.75% $4,574,293 $3,016,674 65.95% EXPENDITURES OPERATING EXPENDITURES Indirect Costs $253,659 $169,114 66.67% $241,580 $161,061 66.67% Maintenance 8, Operations 1,635,547 928,459 56.77% 1,307,872 771,520 58.99% Tennis Center Operations 484,099 267,616 55.28% 435,514 263,758 60.56% TOTAL OPERATING EXP. $2,373,305 $1,365,189 57.52% $1,984,966 $1,196,339 60.27% ~THER EXP. 8, RESERVES Debt Service $1,355,367 $903,623 66.67% $1,369,752 $913,214 66.67% Economic Development 250,000 250,000 100.00% 0 0 0.00% Reserve for Capital Projects 500,633 291,918 58.31% 1,219,575 907,122 74.38% TOTAL OTHER EXP. 8~ RESERVES $2,106,000 $1,445,541 68.64% $2,589,327 $1,820,336 70.30% TOTAL EXP. 8, RESERVES $4,479,305 $2,810,730 62.75% $4,574,293 $3,016,674 65.95% NET BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 Page 6 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 • \-------FISCAL YEAR 2004/05------\ \-----FISCAL YEAR 2003104-----\ ADOPTED REV/EXP % TOTAL REV/EXP REVENUES BUDGET AS OF 5/05 BUDGET REV/EXP AS OF 5/04 ACTUAL Sales Tax $3,888,138 $2,414,993 62.11 % $4,160,049 $2,585,645 62.15% Other 0 0 0.00% 20,970 10,890 51.93% Transition Fund Loan 955,949 637,331 66.67% 660,174 440,138 66.67% Interest Income 48,925 42,032 85.91% 51,444 23,914 46.49% TOTAL REVENUES $4,893,012 $3,094,356 63.24% $4,892,637 $3,060,587 62.55% Appropriation of Prior Year $0 $0 0.00% $6,203 $4,136 66.67% TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES $4,893,012 $3,094,356 63.24% $4,898,840 $3,064,723 62.56% EXPENDITURES Administration $63,881 $44,046 68.95% $22,207 $19,826 89.28% Administrative Services 515,928 345,51 b 66.97% 488,898 306,255 62.64% Investigations 280,895 171,297 60.98% 255,774 157,895 61.73% Patrol 1,781,040 979,364 54.99% 1,489,898 972,004 65.24% Detention Services 296,954 148,615 50.05% 258,024 162,994 63.17% Technical Services 242,646 147,241 60.68% 214,803 135,350 63.01 Vehicle Impoundment 52,581 31,442 59.80% 44,085 27,888 63.26% Communications 12,056 8,316 68.98% 11,254 7,694 68.37% ~OTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES $3,245,982 $1,875,837 57.79% $2,784,943 $1,789,906 64.27% Ol1~ER EXP. 8, RESERVES General Fund-Indirect Costs $401,941 $267,974 66.67% $401,941 $267,974 66.67% General Fund-Salaries 1,092,425 728,320 66.67% 1,103,460 735,677 66.67% Undesignated Potential Reserve 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% CCD Vehicle Replacement 100,000 66,670 66.67% 0 0 0.00% Special Investigation Loan 52,665 35,112 66.67% 55,077 36,720 66.67% Reserve for Computer System 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Reserve for Transition 0 120,447 100.00% 553,420 234,447 42.36% TOTAL OTHER EXP. & RESERVES $1,647,031 $1,218,523 73.98% $2,113,898 $1,274,818 60.31% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8~ RESERVES $4,893,012 $3,094,357 63.24% $4,898,840 $3,064,723 62.56% BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 Page 7 • CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ' UTILITY FUND REVENUE FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 \-----FISCAL YEAR 2004/05--------\ \------------FISCAL YEAR 2003!04-----\ ADOPTED COLLECTED % TOTAL COLLECTED BUDGET AS OF 5/05 BUDGET COLLECTIONS AS OF 5/04 ACTUAL WATER Water Sales & Adj. Cost $12,373,931 $6,890,756 55.69% $1 1,670,190 $6,890,346 59.04% Service Charges 118,200 78,205 66.1 b% 127,570 75,485 59.17% Water Taps 67,593 40,345 59.69% 58,495 37,395 63.93% Water Inspection Fees 27,000 1 1,741 43.49% 27,181 13,806 50.79% Water Well Revenue 13,000 1,462 11.25% 6,859 2,188 31.90% TOTAL WATER $12,599,724 $7,022,509 55.74% $11,890,295 $7,019,220 59.03% SEWER Sewer Sales & Adj. Cost $6,850,000 $4,734,208 69.11% $6,962,346 $4,615,259 66.29% Sewer Taps 22,113 14,200 64.22% 19,115 12,465 65.21% Sewer Inspection Fees 39,650 10,691 26.96% 23,544 16,520 70.17% TOTAL SEWER $6,911,763 $4,759,099 68.86% $7,005,005 $4,644,244 66.30% MISCELLANEOUS Late Fees $d12,b28 $314,066 76.11% $423,624 $259,174 61.18% Miscellaneous 1,500 1,454 96.93% 1,402 1,014 72.33% Subdivision Meter Revenue 53,300 36,450 68.39% 54,150 33,750 62.33% Interest Income 50,000 104,210 208.42% (40,570) (18,668) 46.01% Joint Use Reimbursement (Watauga) 49,656 24,129 48.59% 81,291 45,734 56.26% ~nsfer from Sewer 75,000 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% TCTrALMISCELLANEOUS $642,084 $480,309 74.80% $519,897 $321,004 61.74% TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE $20,153,571 $12,261,917 60.84% $19,415,197 $11,984,468 61.73% APPROPRIATION OF I&S RESERVE $0 $0 0.00% $300,000 $200,010 66.67% APPROPRIATION OF INSURANCE RESERVE $115,750 $77,171 66.67% $54,400 $36,268 66.67% TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES $20,269,321 $12,339,088 60.88% $14,769,597 $12,220,746 61.82% Page 8 ` CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ' UTILITY FUND EXPENSES 8. RESERVES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 \---------FISCAL YEAR 2004/05--------\ \---------FISCAL YEAR 2003/04-----\ ADOPTED EXPENSES % TOTAL EXPENSES BUDGET AS OF 5/05 BUDGET EXPENSES AS OF 5/04 ACTUAL OPERATING EXPENSES: ADMINISTRATION $212,997 $144,303 67.75% $217,983 $139,746 64.11% Water Operations $2,918,480 $1,683,156 57.67% $2,574,535 $1,625,626 63.14% Purchase of Water FTW 2,459,246 1,334,169 54.25% 1,298,028 703,243 54.18% Purchase of WaterTRA 3,601,455 1,951,626 54.19% 3,711,254 1,979,920 53.35% Sewer Operations 910,645 528,917 58.08% 805,258 517,183 64.23% Sewer Treatment FTW 924,280 532,826 57.65% 936,444 578,406 bl .77% Sewer TreatmentTRA 2,608,238 1,589,043 60.92% 2,692,009 1,565,137 58.14% Development 557,273 355,550 63.80% 506,478 321,234 63.43% TOTAL UTILITY OPERATIONS $13,979,617 $7,975,287 57.05% $12,524,006 $7,290,749 58.21% Water Service $340,758 $231,237 67.86% $332,354 $217,859 65.55% Customer Service 654,779 426,413 65.12% 626,156 400,706 63.99% Revenue Collections 207,955 136,757 65.76% 192,892 123,092 63.81% Accounting 133,711 81,351 60.84% 120,355 82,076 68.14% Budget & Research 158,421 98,809 62.37% 145,594 89,895 61.74% Right of Way Maintenance 125,000 42,278 33.82% 121,330 45,865 37.80% TOTAL BILLING AND COLLECTION $1,620,624 $1,016,845 62.74% $1,538,681 $954,493 62.36% BUILDING SERVICES $889,686 $593,154 66.67%, $847,320 $564,908 66.67% DEPARTMENTAL $392,756 $192,144 48.42% $290,676 $128,085 44.06% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $1T,095,b80 $9,921,733 58.04% $15,418,666 $9,082,981 58.91% OTHER EXPENSES & RESERVES Debt Service $485,231 $323,504 66.67% $621,387 $414,279 66.67% Franchise Fees 545,942 348,749 58.52% 558,976 345,168 61.75% Indirect Cost 1,283,271 855,557 66.67% 1,222,163 814,816 66.67% Payment in Lieu of Taxes 298,385 198,933 66.67% 318,856 212,581 66.67% Allocated Utility CIP Reserve to Information Services Fund 175,000 116,673 66.67% 175,000 1 16,673 66.67% Contribution to Insurance Fund for Reserve for Future Claims 115,750 77,171 66.67% 100,000 66,670 66.67% Contribution to Building/Equipment Svs. 50,000 33,335 66.67% 125,000 83,338 66.67% Transfer from Sewer 75,000 50,003 66.67% 0 0 0.00% Reserve for Capital Projects 95,062 95,062 100.Q0% 278,264 278,264 100.00% Potential Undesignated Reserve 0 318,373 100.00% 951,285 805,977 84.73% TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES & RESERVES $3,173,641 $2,417,358 76.17% $4,350,931 $3,137,765 72.12% TOTAL CURRENT YEAR EXPENSES $20,269,321 $12.339,087 60.88% $19,769,597 $12,220,746 61.82% & RESERVES NET BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 Page 9 " CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AQUATIC PARK FUND REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 \-----FISCAL YEAR 2004/05----\ \------FISCAL YEAR 2003/04------\ ADOPTED REV/EXP % TOTAL REV/EXP BUDGET AS OF 5/05 BUDGET COLLECTIONS AS OF 5/04 ACTUAL REVENUES Admissions $2,126,275 $93,802 4.41% $1,412,373 $18,364 1.30% Advanced & Group Sales 710,655 261,697 36.82% 831,086 138,735 16.69% Food and Beverage 540,845 42,976 7.95% 404,927 20,548 5.07% Merchandise 154.041 9,377 6.09% 89,954 5,098 5.67% Lockers 74,937 3,541 4.73% 42,261 1,304 3.10% Interestlncome 30,000 28,780 95.93% 32,528 21,305 65.50% Donations 20,000 0 0.00% 20,000 20,000 100.00% Aquatic Classes 0 0 0.00% 5,920 0 0.00% Special Events 67,170 8,391 12.49% 64,503 6,426 10.74% Miscellaneous 13,797 8,541 61.90% 28,579 9,552 33.42% Infrastructure Reserve Loan 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% TOTAL REVENUES $3,737,720 $457,105 12.23% $2.932,131 $241,837 8.25% Appropriation of Insurance Reserve $0 $0 0.00% $129,954 $86,640 66.67% Appropriation of Prior Year $0 $0 0.00% $0 $0 0.00% TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES $3,737,720 $457,105 12.23% $3,062,085 $328,477 10.73% EXPENSES OPERATING EXPENSES General Services $688,787 $254,571 36.96% $507,091 $247,420 48.79% Parks & Public Grounds 72,894 15,905 21.82% 68,632 14,517 21.15% Business Office 95,459 45,815 47.99% 79,776 37,641 47.18% Marketing/Advertising 384,078 68,169 17.75% 355,657 93,823 26.38% uatics 427,983 123,376 28.83% 431,608 86,099 19.95% ntenance 338,958 169,633 50.05% 310,613 151,498 48.77% iftShop 131,547 22,998 17.48% 98,651 42,979 43.57% Food 260,344 43,398 16.67% 209,121 36,221 17.32% Ice Cream Shop 91,322 15,007 16.43% 66,221 7,227 10.91% Group Sales 100,042 44,608 44.59% 78,727 42,369 53.82% Admissions 91,938 20,861 22.69% 81,503 17,118 21.00% Elements of Fun 15,884 1,764 11.1 1% 17,424 3,275 18.80% Birthday Parties 47,785 7,458 15.61% 19,989 4,010 20.06% Catering 22,469 1,482 6.60% 28,516 1,932 6.78% Rentals 11,122 3,685 33.13% 5,306 3,388 63.85% Non-Departmental 9,557 4,897 51.24% 0 0 0.00% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $2,790,169 $843,627 30.24% $2,358,835 $789,517 33.47% OTHER EXP. 8~ RESERVES Reserve for Future Infrastructure $325,000 $216,678 66.67% $325,000 $216,678 66.67% Major Repairs Reserve for Aquatic Park Expansion 2.376 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Reserve for Insurance 75,000 50,003 66.67% 75,000 50,003 66.67% Allocation to Internal Service Fund 0 0 0.00% 129,954 86,640 66.67% Debt Service Expense 450,587 300,dOb 66.67% 590,041 393,380 66.67% Indirect Costs 94,588 63,062 66.67% 90,084 60,059 66.67% TOTAL OTHER EXP. 8, RES. $947,551 $630,148 66.50% $1,210,079 $806,760 66.67% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES AND RESERVES $3,737,720 $1,473,775 39.43% $3,568,914 $1,596,277 44.73% t~ALANCE $0 ($1,016,670) ($506,829) ($1,267,799) Page 10 ` CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 \----FISCAL YEAR 2004/05- \---------FISCAL YEAR 2003/04-----\ ADOPTED REV/EXP % TOTAL REV/EXP BUDGET AS OF 5105 BUDGET COLLECTIONS AS OF 5/04 ACTUAL ROUNDS 51,500 28,516 55.37% 52,176 29,358 56.27% REVENUES Green Fees $i,149,5b6 $516,434 44.92% $857,756 $483,270 56.34% Membership 0 51,849 100.00% 85,982 60,014 69.80% Carts 498,593 213,522 42.82% 457,726 278,043 60.74% Food/Beverage 481,512 257,198 53.41 % 398,638 219,183 54.98% Pro Shop/Driving Range 367,331 228,580 62.23% 350,007 205,725 58.78% Loan From Pay-As-You-Go-Reserve 0 0 0.00% 183,805 122,543 66.67% Other 23,744 17,976 75.71% 30,078 19,465 64.72% TOTAL REVENUES $2,520,746 $1,285,559 51.00% $2,363,992 $1,388,243 58.72% COST OF GOODS SOLD $296,839 $154,910 52.19% $249,284 $142,300 57.08% APPROPRIATION OF PRIOR YEAR $0 $0 0.00% $1 13,621 $75,751 66.67% GROSS PROFIT $2,223,907 $1,130,649 50.84% $2,228,329 $1,321,694 59.31% EXPENSES OPERATING EXPENSES roShop $261,658 $128,088 48.95% $210,356 $134,059 63.73% iving Range 10,550 8,652 82.01% 9,382 6,486 69.13% olf Carts 171,198 66,067 38.59% 106,263 59,873 56.34% Course Maintenance 600,001 352,553 58.76% 532,328 312,850 58.77% Food & Beverage 176,709 108,600 61.46% 158,137 92,239 58.33% General and Administrative 209,797 120,370 57.37% 190,817 1 19,613 62.68% Clubhouse 0 44,682 100.00% 65,115 38,370 58.93% Capital 0 0 0.00% 183,805 122,543 66.67% Fixed Charges 147,600 57,891 39.22% 158,305 117,198 74.03% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $1,577,513 $886,903 56.22% $1,614,508 $1,003,231 62.14% OTHER EXP. & RESERVES Debt Service $523,851 $349,251 66.67% $510,777 $340,535 66.67% Reserve for Equipment Purchases 23,814 15,877 66.67% 46,590 31,062 66.67% Debt Payment -Equipment 42,275 28,185 66.67% 0 0 0.00% Debt Payment -Water 56,454 37,638 66.67% 56,454 37,638 66.67% TOTAL OTHER EXP. & RESERVES $646,394 $430,951 66.67% $613,821 $409,234 66.67% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES AND RESERVES $2,223,907 $1,317,854 59.26% $2,228,329 $1,412,465 63.39% NET BALANCE $0 ($187,205) $0 ($90,771) Page 1 1 ' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS EQUIPMENT SERVICES FUND REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 \---FISCAL YEAR 2004/05---------\ \----------FISCAL YEAR 2003104-----\ ADOPTED REV/EXP % TOTAL REV/EXP BUDGET AS OF 5/05 BUDGET REV/EXP AS OF 5/04 ACTUAL REVENUES CHARGES FOR SERVICE General Fund $862,489 $575,355 66.67% $806,530 $537,714 66.67% Utility Fund 825,212 550,169 66.67% 771,227 514,177 66.67% Utility CIP Fund 121,068 80,716 66.67% 113,149 75,436 66.67% Crime Control District 71,475 47,652 66.67% 66,799 44,535 66.67% Park & Recreation Dev. Fund. 58,000 38,669 66.67% Sd,206 36,139 66.67% Other Funds 30,762 20,509 66.67% 28,749 19,167 66.67% TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE $1,969,506 $1,313,070 66.67% $1,840,660 $1,227,168 66.67% OTHER REVENUE Interestlncome $25,700 $35,673 138.81% $31,410 $20,680 65.84% Sale of City Property 30,000 0 0.00% 33,365 18,625 55.82% Transfer from General/Utility/CCD 150,000 100,005 66.67% 125,000 83,338 66.67% Other Income 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% TOTAL OTHER REVENUE $205,700 $135,678 65.96% $189,775 $122,643 64.63% TOTAL REVENUES $2,175,207 $1,448,748 66.60% $2,030,435 $1,349,811 66.48% Appropriation of Prior Year $365,676 $243,796 66.67% $31,515 $21,011 66.67% TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $365,676 $243,796 66.67% $31,515 $21,011 66.67% FUNDING SOURCES $2,540,882 $1,692,Sd4 66.61% $2,061,950 $1,370,822 66.48% EXPENSE OPERATING EXPENSES Administration $158,754 $100,960 63.60% $138,118 $84,844 61.43% Equipment Services 1,231,514 787,620 63.96% 1,143,940 684,416 59.83% Equipment Purchases/Refurbishing 1,042,680 606,260 58.14% 411,685 349,601 84.92% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $2,432,948 $1,494,840 61.44% $1,693,743 $1,118,861 66.06% OTHER EXPENSES & RESERVES Potential Reserve for Vehicle Replacement $5,287 $5,287 100.00% $0 $0 0.00% Debt Service 102,647 68,d35 66.67% 101,816 67,881 66.67% Equipment Services Reserve 0 123,982 100.00% 266,390 184,080 69.10% TOTAL OTHER EXP. & RESERVES $107,934 $197,704 183.17% $368,206 $251,961 68.43% TOTAL EXPENSES 8~ RESERVES $2,540,882 $1,692,544 66.61% $2,061,950 $1,370,822 66.48% NET BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 Page 12 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BUILDING SERVICES FUND REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 \ FISCAL YEAR 2004/05----------\ \-------FISCAL YEAR 2003/04-------\ ADOPTED REV(EXP % TOTAL REVJEXP % BUDGET AS OF 5/05 BUDGET REV/EXP AS OF 5/04 ACTUAL REVENUES CHARGES FOR SERVICE General Fund $724,877 $483,275 66.67% $732,621 $488,438 66.67% General/Utility Funds 175,000 116,673 66.67% 225,000 150,008 66.67% Utility Fund 777,186 518,150 66.67% 734,821 489,905 66.67% TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE $1,677,063 $l,l 18,098 66.67% $1,692,442 $1,128,351 66.67% OTHER REVENUE Interest Income $18,275 $27,044 147.98% $22,538 $14,519 64.42% Sale of City Assets 0 0 0.00% 1,492 1,492 100.00% Other Income 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% TOTAL OTHER REVENUE $18,275 $27,044 147.98% $24,030 $16,011 66.63% Appropriation of Prior Year $35,704 $20,826 58.33% $109 $64 58.33% TOTAL REVENUES $1,731,042 $1,165,968 67.36% $1,716,581 $1,144,426 66.67% EXPENSES FRAYING EXPENSES dministration $152,767 $46,634 63.26% $130,888 $81,485 62.26% wilding Services 1,330,357 739,673 55.60% 1,175,888 682,718 58.06% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $1,483,124 $836,307 56.39% $1,306,776 $764,203 58.48% OTHER EXPENSES ~ RESERVES Undesignated Potential Reserve $0 $154,019 100.00% $0 $0 0.00% CIP Capital Maintenance 200,000 133,340 66.67% 200,000 133,340 66.67% Contribution to Debt Service 43,607 29,073 66.67% 44,905 29,938 66.67% Use of Prior Year Appropriations 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Reserve for Building Capital Projects 4,311 13,230 306.89% 164,900 216,945 131.56% TOTAL OTHER EXP. & RESERVES $247,918 $329,662 132.97% $409,805 $380,223 92.78% TOTAL EXPENSES 8~ RESERVES $1,731,042 $1,165,968 67.36% $1,716,581 $1,144,425 66.67% NET BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 Page 13 ` CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS INSURANCE FUND REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 \--------FISCAL YEAR 2004/05--------\ \-------FISCAL YEAR 2003/04--------\ ADOPTED COLLECTED % TOTAL COLLECTED EVENUES BUDGET AS OF 5/OS BUDGET REV/EXP AS OF 5/04 ACTUAL TOTAL HEALTH/MEDICAL $5,666,651 $3,777,956 66.67% $4,248,580 $2,832,528 66.67% TOTAL WORKERS COMPENSATION $406,705 $271,150 66.67% $978,685 $652,489 66.67% TOTAL GENERAL LIABILITY $154,847 $103,236 66.67% $295,608 $197,082 66.67% OTHER INCOME Interest income $7,745 $14,866 191.94% $4,659 $3,314 71.13% Electric Franchise Fees 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Unemployment Insurance 34,975 23,318 66.67% 22,400 14,934 66.67% General/Utility/Aq. Park Fund Transfer 463,000 308,682 66.67% 229,954 153,310 66.67% Other Income 160,822 146,714 91.23% 88,113 23,294 26.44% TOTAL OTHER INCOME $666,542 $493,580 74.05% $345,126 $194,852 56.46% TOTAL REVENUES $6,894,745 $4,645,923 67.38% $5,867,999 $3,876,952 66.07% Appropriation of Prior Year $0 $0 0.00% $121,383 $80,926 66.67% TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $0 $0 0.00% $121,383 $80,926 66.67% TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES $6,894,745 $4,645,923 67.38% $5,989,382 $3,957,878 66.08% PENSES TOTAL HEALTH/MEDICAL $5,051,426 $3,179,590 62.94% $5,004,447 $2,934,432 58.64% TOTAL WORKERS COMPENSATION $372,714 $292,854 78.57% $466,379 $306,866 65.80% TOTAL OTHER INSURANCE EXP. $326,600 $118,967 36.43% $336,761 $131,901 39.17% HUMAN RESOURCES OPERATING EXPENSES $447,914 $226,378 50.54% $449,083 $291,468 64.90% OTHER EXPENSES ~ RESERVES Life Insurance Premiums $99,000 $39,295 39.69% $110,884 $75,555 68.14% Reserve for Insurance Claims 597,091 597,091 100.00% 0 0 0.00% Undesignated Potential Reserve 0 191,748 100.00% 0 217,656 100.00% TOTAL OTHER EXP. & RESERVES $696,091 $828,134 118.97% $110,884 $293,211 264.43% TOTAL EXPENSES 8, RESERVES $6,894,745 $4,645,923 67.38% $6,367,554 $3,957,878 62.16% NET BALANCE $0 $0 ($378,172) $0 Page 14 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS INFORMATION SERVICES FUND REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2005 FISCAL YEAR 2004/05-------\ \------FISCAL YEAR 2003/04---\ ADOPTED REV/EXP % TOTAL REV/EXP UES BUDGET AS OF 5/OS BUDGET REV/EXP AS OF 5/04 ACTUAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE - TELECOMMUNICATIONS General Fund $226,071 $150,722 66.67% $216,360 $144,247 66.67% Utility Fund/Utility CIP 53,711 35,809 66.67% 46,721 31,149 66.67% Support Services Fund 10,513 7,009 66.67% 9,536 6,358 66.67% Self-Insurance Fund 2,374 1,583 66.67% 2,153 1,435 66.67% Park/Recreation Facilities Devlp. Fund 8,630 5,754 66.67% 12,801 8,534 66.67% Aquatic Park Fund 12,368 8,246 66.67% 11,218 7,479 66.67% Crime Control District 12,210 8,140 66.67% 11,076 7,384 66.67% Promotional Fund 2,622 1,748 66.67% 2,378 1,585 66.67% TOTAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS $328,499 $219,010 66.67% $312,243 $208,172 66.67% CHARGES FOR SERVICE - COMPUTERS General Fund $939,463 $626,340 66.67% $894,728 $596,515 66.67% Utility Fund/Utility CIP 489,500 326,350 66.67% 466,190 310,809 66.67% Support Services Fund 67,192 44,797 66.67% 66,203 44,138 66.67% Self-Insurance Fund 17,633 11,756 66.67% 16,793 11,196 66.67% Park/Recreation Facilities Devlp. Fund 32,535 21,691 66.67% 28,776 19,185 66.67% NRH2O Aquatic Park Fund 95,538 63,695 66.67% 90,989 60,662 66.67% Utility Reserves-Capital Projects 175,000 116,673 66.67% 175,000 116,673 66.67% Crime Control District 113,650 75,770 66.67% 108,238 72,162 66.67% Promotional Fund 15,948 10,633 66.67% 15,188 10,126 66.67% TOTAL COMPUTER $1,946,459 $1,297,704 66.67% $1,862,105 $1,241,465 66.67% Interest Income $20,355 $27,949 137.31% $24,014 $14,706 61.24% ntribution from Citicable 9,000 6,000 66.67% 9,000 6,000 66.67% ~smitter Lease Income 56,590 55,951 98.87% 75,615 39,745 52.56% Cher Income 0 19,017 100.00% 9,445 7,672 81.23% TOTAL REVENUES $2,360,903 $1,625,632 68.86% $2,292,422 $1,517,761 66.21% Appropriation of Prior Year $0 $0 0.00% $179,464 119,649 66.67% TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES $2,360,903 $1,625,632 68.86% $2,471,886 $1,637,410 66.24% OPERATING EXPENSES General Services $195,876 $119,282 60.90% $169,709 $104,025 61.30% Major Computer Systems 261,773 211,577 80.82% 370,967 216,987 58.49% Microcomputer Systems 518,385 313,967 60.57% 419,404 331,788 79.11% Telecommunications 315,078 166,190 52.75% 216,199 153,678 71.08% Data Network 498,927 328,396 65.82% 223,259 137,521 61.60% GIS Network 177,084 106,016 59.87% 125,603 79,348 63.17% Public Safety 259,066 177,087 68.36% 234,652 185,158 78.91% TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $2,226,189 $1,422,515 63.90% $1,759,793 $1,208,505 68.67% OTHER EXPENSES & RESERVES Contribution to Debt Service $0 $0 0.00% $0 $0 0.00% Reserve for System Improvements 134,714 134,714 100.00% 712,093 428,905 60.23% Undesignated Potential Reserve 0 68,403 100.00% 0 0 0.00% TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES & RESERVES $134,714 $203,1 17 150.78% $712,093 $428,905 60.23% L EXPENSES $2,360,903 $1,625,632 68.86% $2,471,886 $1,637,410 66.24% ANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 Page 15 FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 SCHEDULE 1 -SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED Difference ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Revised vs. FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 Adopted REVENUES Taxes $22,005,941 $22,954,899 $23,075,296 $22,665,056 ($410,240) Fines & Forfeitures 1,582,165 1,775,902 1,728,080 1,732,080 4,000 Licenses & Permits 1,665,390 1,606,447 1.,:558,140 1,469,210 (86,930) Charges for Service 1,954,556 1,831,681. 1;942,142 1,894,296 (47,846) Intergovernmental 3,004,728 3,164,230 3,280,885 3,280,885 0 Miscellaneous 346,508 275,320 499,?49 474,216 (25,533) Sub-Total Revenues $30,559,288 $31,608,479 '..$32,082,292 $31,515,743 ($566,549) Appropriation -Settlement 0 0 0 650,000 650,000 Appropriation -Ins. Reserve 0 0 347,250 347,250 0 Appropriation - PY Enc. 0 0 ! 0 394,734 394,734 TOTAL REVENUES $30,559,288 $31,608,479' $32,429,542 $32,907,727 $478,185 EXPENDITURES City Council $138,493 '$157,044 $159,615 $158,715 ($900) City Manager 479,416 501,894' 486,165 485,031 (1,134) Communications 490,410 475,648 .487,279 478,373 (8,906) City Secretary 392;590 405,550 426,846 423,329 (3,517) Legal 635,829.. 637,01:2 500,033 499,480 (553) Human Resources 99,687 99,506 111,576 108,367 (3,209) Finance 703,277 733,335; 756,933 749,390 (7,543) Budget & Research 294,005 315,230 313,069 311,289 (1,780) Municipal Court 1,014,7741'- 992,842 1,021,482 1,017,805 (3,677) Inspections 570,064 ' 585,520 644,824 622,373 (22,451) Planning 366,301 233,809 233,398 206,837 (26,561) s Economic Development 93,820 95,501 100,787 100,787 0 Library 1,388,844 ' ' 1,457,168 1,479,744 1,473,060 (6,684) Neighborhood Services 1,047,875 1,262,090 1,348,558 1,315,760 (32,798) Public Works 2;909,068 2,278,244 2,879,116 2,750,096 (129,020) s Parks & Recreation 2,421,367 2,346,225 2,422,296 2,371,689 (50,607) a Police 8,239,758 8,540,424 8,799,788 8,634,227 (165,561) a Fire 7,213,601 7,330,422 7,890,793 7,881,351 (9,442) Building Services 867,1'50 845,124 787,377 787,377 0 Non-Departmental 712,568 868,304 988,711 927,711 (61,000) Sub-Total Departments $30,078,897 $30,160,892 $31,838,390 $31,303,047 ($535,343) Reserve for Capital Improvements 450,000 550,000 150,000 150,000 0 Market Adjustment 0 0 67,926 0 (67,926) s Legal Settlement 0 0 0 650,000 650,000 Insurance Reserve Policy 0 0 347,250 347,250 0 Previous Year Encumbrances 394,734 394,734 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $30,528,897 $30,710,879 $32,403,566 $32,845,031 $441,465 BALANCE $30,391 $897,600 $25,976 $62,696 $36,720 Page 1 of 6 FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 SCHEDULE 2 -SUMMARY OF REVENUES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED Difference ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Revised vs. FY 2002103 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 Adopted TAXES Current Property Taxes $9,013,449 $9,720,352 $10',1.83,013. $10,183,013 $0 Delinquent Property Taxes 140,545 280,075 142;050 142,050 0 Penalty and Interest 115,129 160,925 98,483... 98,483 0 Franchise Fees 3,684,707 3,592,682 3;443,000 3,391,748 (51,252) Utility Fund Franchise Taxes 547,421 558,976'.. 595;942 595,942 0 Sales Taxes 8,082,777 8,215;869' 8,204,423 7,845,435 (358,988) ' Mixed Beverages 114,122 107,164 '110,000 110,000 0 Payment in Lieu of Taxes 307,791 318,856 298,385 298,385 0 Sub-Total $22,005,941 $22,954,899 $23,075,296 $22,665,056 ($410,240) FINES AND FORFEITURES Municipal Court Fines $1,303,005 $1,481,248 $1,426,080 '"'$1,426,080 $0 Library Fines 61,046 60,561 58,000 57,000 (1,000) Warrant & Arrest Fees 218,114 234,093 244,000 249,000 5,000 Sub-Total $1,582,165 _ $1,775,902 $1,728080 $1,732,080 $4,000 LICENSES AND PERMITS Building Permits $680,668 $669,572' $630,000 $630,000 $0 Electrical Permits 72,5'14 57,946 60,000 63,000 3,000 Plumbing Permits 80,348 72,925 68,000 75,000 7,000 Mechanical Permits 35,040 49,697 38,500 45,000 6,500 Miscellaneous Permits 71,998 79,180 70,800 65,850 (4,950) Apartment Inspection 'Fees 0 47,641 79,200 79,200 0 Curb & Drainage Insp: Fees ' 119,820 100,192 121,000 60,000 (61,000) Re-Inspection Fees 9,510 17,940 12,000 16,250 4,250 License Fees 15,303 15,500 12,000 14,500 2,500 Contractor Registration Fees ' 86,640 83,334 84,000 72,000 (12,000) Plan ReviewlApplic2tion Fee 132,187 94,275 89,000 45,000 (44,000) Animal License/Adoption Fees 76,975 72,079 79,540 72,260 (7,280) Animal Control Impoundment `56,558 56,163 53,500 53,500 0 Crematorium Revenues 5,533 5,021 4,500 4,000 (500) Auto Impoundment Fees 55,893 15,371 0 15,000 15,000 Food Service Permits 99,108 101,660 91,000 95,550 4,550 Food Managers School 10,535 15,720 13,000 14,000 1,000 Fire Inspection/Alarm Fees 23,610 20,132 17,000 16,000 (1,000) Publici Fees - Re r c eation tY 33 150 32 099 33 100 33 1 00 0 Sub-Total $1,665,390 $1,606,447 $1,556,140 $1,469,210 ($86,930) Page 2 of 6 FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 SCHEDULE 2 -SUMMARY OF REVENUES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED Difference ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Revised vs. FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 Adopted CHARGES FOR SERVICE Park Facility Rental $3,485 $6,620 $3,450 $3,450 $0 Recreation Center Rental 13,310 11,222 17,000'." 14,120 (2,880) Ambulance Fees 935,631 932,246 96Q,000 987,000 27,000 Garbage Billing 248,858 235,236 23(?,000 230,000 0 Contributions 10,000 10,000 1(3,000 10,000 0 Maps & Codes 666 126 300 150 (150) Recreation Fees 408,680 355,401 464,107' 399,171 (64,936) Cultural Arts 6,368 14,129 ' '6,500 6,500 0 Athletic Revenue 148,667 126,120 112,255 105,641 (6,614) Recreation Special Events 34,897 8,586 11,530 12,764 1,234 Planning & Zoning Fees 42,044 30,364 30,000 32,000 2,000 Sale of Accident Reports 27,093 27,619 25,000 23,500 (1,500) Vital Statistics 54,861 56,676 53;,(300 53,000 0 Mowing 14,562 16,811 18,000- 17,000 (1,000) Non-Resident Library Fees 0 _ t) 0 0 0 Video Services Income 4,930 500 500 0 (500) Video Tape Sales 504 25 500 0 500 Sub-Total $1,954,556 $1,831,681 $1942,:'142 $1,894,296 ($47,846) INTERGOVERNMENTAL Indirect Costs: General CIP '$105,000 $105,000" $155,000 $155,000 $0 Utility Fund 1,163,964 1,222,164 1,283,271 1,283,271 0 Park & Rec Facilities Dev. Corp. ' 23Q,076 241,582 253,659 253,659 0 Crime Control District 382;800 401,940 401,942 401,942 0 Aquatic Park Fund 85,800 90,084 94,588 94,588 0 Direct Cost -General Fund 1,037,088 1,103,460 1,092,425 1,092,425 0 Police Department S~leries Sub-Total $3,004,728 ' $3,164,230 $3,280,885 $3,280,885 $0 MISCELLANEOUS Interest Income $88,638 $66,181 $83,500 $83,500 $0 Sale of City Property 9,184 3,286 0 0 0 Grant Proceeds-Grim. Justice 62,556 6,955 79,000 79,000 0 Grant Proceeds-CDBG 0 49,874 25,000 36,500 11,500 Overtime Reimbursements 9,801 11,698 9,800 6,000 (3,800) Tax Attorney Fees 49,998 79,756 35,000 35,000 0 Other Income 106,727 44,012 37,551 31,551 (6,000) Sponsorships (Fire) 0 0 27,233 0 (27,233) Special Invest. Fund Loan Payment 19,604 13,558 52,665 52,665 0 SRO Reimbursement (BISD) 0 0 150,000 150,000 0 Sub-Total $346,508 $275,320 $499,749 $474,216 ($25,533) Appropriation -Legal Settlement 0 0 0 650,000 650,000 Appropriation -Insurance Reserve 0 0 347,250 347,250 0 Appropriation-P/Y Encumbrances 0 0 0 394,734 394,734 TOTAL REVENUES $30,559,288 $31,608,479 $32,429,542 $32,907,727 $478,185 Page 3 of 6 FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 SCHEDULE 3 -SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED Difference ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Revised vs. FY 2002103 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004105 Adopted City Council $138,493 $157,044 $159,615 $158,715 ($900) City Manager 479,416 501,894 486,165 485,031 (1,134) Communications Public Information 207,152 201,645` 197,902 196,149 (1,753) Citicable 283,258 274,003 289,377 282,224. (7,153) Total Communications 490,410 475,648c 4:87,279 478,373 (8,906) City Secretary City Secretary 220,360 231,198 23$,919 236,702 (2,217) Record Management 172,230 174,352 1!$7,927.. 186,627 (1,300) Total City Secretary 392,590 405,550 426,846 423,329 (3,517) Legal 635,829 637,012 500,033 499,480 (553) Human Resources 99,687 99,506 111,576 108,367 (3,209) Finance Accounting & Administration 486,679 509,375 5:27,756 522,430 (5,326) Purchasing 216,598 223;960 .229,177 226,960 (2,217) Total Finance 703;277 733;335 756,933 749,390 (7,543) Budget & Research Budget 78,446 80,641 83,914 82,860 (1,054) Tax 179,136 202,193 187,801 187,801 0 Internal Audit 36,423 32,396 41,354 40,628 _ (726) Total Budget & Research 294,005 .....315,230 313,069 311,289 (1,780) Municipal Court Administration/Prosecution 337,290 _289,360 270,545 271,929 1,384 Court Records 280,534 286,482 317,493 320,684 3,191 Warrants 269,342 288,200 297,344 290,417 (6,927) Teen Court 52,595 54,643 58,540 57,215 (1,325) Judicial 75,013 74,157 77,560 77,560 0 Total Municipal Court - 1',01.4,774 992,842 1,021,482 1,017,805 (3,677) Inspections 570,064 585,520 644,824 622,373 (22,451) Planning 366,301 233,809 233,398 206,837 (26,561) z Economic Development 93,820 95,501 100,787 100,787 0 Library General Services 184,491 185,990 198,268 197,149 (1,119) Public Services 643,559 687,894 657,860 654,155 (3,705) Technical Services 560,794 583,284 623,616 621,756 (1,860) Total Library 1,388,844 1,457,168 1,479,744 1,473,060 (6,684) Page 4 of 6 FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 SCHEDULE 3 -SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED Difference ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Revised vs. FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 Adopted Neighborhood Services Neighborhood Resources $265,357 $264,115 $258,779 $253,077 ($5,702) Humane Division 555,479 566,610 576,944`-- 551,839 (25,105) Consumer Health 227,039 228,428 258,283 250,220 (8,063) Code Enforcement 0 202,937 254,552 260,624 6,072 Total Neighborhood Services 1,047,875 1,262,090 1;348,558 1,315,760 (32,798) Public Works General Services 131,774 130',Q39 144,755 143,902 (853) Traffic Control 800,755 844,897 894,433 834,534 (59,899) s Street & Drainage 1,976,539 1,303,308 1,839,928 1,771,660 (68,268) s Total Public Works 2,909,068 2,278,244 2,879,116 2,750,096 (129,020) Park & Recreation General Services 137,271 1.51,787 122,788 87,675 (35,113) ° Parks Maintenance 1,020,378 993,944 1,041,982 1,033,830 (8,152) Recreation Services 730,110 750,244 786,816 782,156 (4,660) Athletic Program Services 228,702 195,958 ` 201,352 200,423 (929) Senior Adult Services 146,524 142,890 149,688 148,624 (1,064) Youth Outreach & Cultural 158,382 111;402 119,670 118,981 (689) Total Park & Recreation 2,421,367 2,346,225 2,422,296 2,371,689 (50,607) Police General Services 44fl;680 463,29& " 480,007 443,957 (36,050) e Administrative Services 591,425 571,130 617,767 618,277 510 Criminal Investigation 1,641,212 1,731,717 1,761,657 1,694,262 (67,395) s Uniform Patrol 3,595,896' 3,732,267 3,847,533 3,792,510 (55,023) e Tactical Unit 24,667 27,925 29,843 29,662 (181) Technical Services 738,342 769,422 725,404 721,771 (3,633) Detention Services 344,974 350,152 376,282 375,332 (950) Property Evidence 11 i ,191 114,921 119,237 117,917 (1,320) Communications 751 371 779 592 842,058 840,539 (1,519) Total Police 8;239,758 8,540,424 8,799,788 8,634,227 (165,561) Fire Department General Services 244,642 261,899 272,322 271,762 (560) Operations 5;336,265 5,589,230 6,104,567 6,093,169 (11,398) Emergency Medical 813,978 694,242 798,109 798,660 551 Fire Inspections 381,692 374,887 387,170 387,353 183 Emergency Management 435,024 410,164 328,625 330,407 1,782 Total Fire 7,213,601 7,330,422 7,890,793 7,881,351 (9,442) Page 5 of 6 ~ FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 SCHEDULE 3 -SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED Difference ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Revised vs. FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004105 FY 2004/05 Adopted Building Services $867,150 $845,124 $787,377 $787,377 $0 Non-Departmental 712,568 868,304 988,71.1 927,711 (61,000) Market Adjustment 0 0 67,926 0 (67,926) s Reserve for Capital Improvements 450,000 550QIJ0 150,000 150,000 0 Legal Settlement 0 0 ` 0 650,000 650,000 Operating Transfers Out 0 0 347,250 347,250 0 PY Encumbrances 394,734 394,734 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $30,528,897 $30,710,892 $32,403,566 $32,845,031 $441,465 BALANCE $30,391 ' $897,587 .$25,976 $62,696 $36,720 Footnotes: ' The closure of North Hills Mall as well as other business gains artd losses resulted in the reduction of sales tax revenue and the implementation of a contingency plan to reduce expenses throughout the General Fund accordingly. s Most of this decrease is due to a four month,position vacancy. s Lower than anticipated traffic signal electric usage; and reductions in non-essential and weather related street and drainage repair a Most of this decrease is due #o a position vacancy. s Most of this decrease is due to position vacancies in Administration, Investigations and Patrol divisions. a Market Adjustment costs have been distributed to the various General Fund departments. ~ Prior year encumbrances are expenses budgeted in FY 2003/04 but did not occur until FY 2004/05. Page 6 of 6 Preliminary Tax Roll ~relirninary Tax Rail Tarrant Appraisal District May 2005 estimated 3% loss from May 2005 Preliminary Roll to July Certified 2005 Based on history of Value Loss from May roll to July roll Used these values to calculate preliminary Property Tax Revenues for FY 2006 Includes X84 million new construction • Tax Revenue at 99% collection rate estimated X18.3 million Tax Revenue Calculations based on 3.57 property tax rate (adopted FY 2005 rate) Distribution, ©fi Tax Revenues 37% for Debt Service 4°'o for T1Fs 59% for Operations & Maintenance (General Fund) • Preliminary Tax Roil Preliminary property Tax Revenue Calculations >=Y 200512006 Estimated Values Juiy 2005 (3% loss from May 2005 roll) $ 3,244,263,668 Tax Rate Per $100 value ~ 0.57 Tax Levy at 100% collection $ 18,492,303 Less Estimated 1 % Uncollectable ~ (184,923) • Less Estimated Debt Service/TIF Transfer $ (7,462,315) . _ t , . , . ~ G'ene~a~`Eu~~E`sti ..u~ _ _ Preliminary Tax Roil ~lvw Par Do Pr©perty T'ax Revenues Go? Estimated Total Property Tax Revenues FY 2006 (99% collections) $ 18,307,380 Debt Service/ T1Fs Preliminary FY 2006 ~ (7,462,315) Balance Available for Operations (general fund) $ 10,845,064 Police Operations FY 2006 Preliminary (general fund) ~ (9,145,848) • Balance Available for Other Operations {general fund) ~ 1,699,216 I Fire Operations FY 2006 Preliminary (general fund) ~ (8,369,995) Needed from Other Revenue Sources for Police and Fire Service (general fund) ~ (8,870,779) Preliminary Tax Roll Effective Tax Rate Calculation Basic Definition: Property Tax rate necessary to produce the same amount of property tax revenues as the prior year. Includes increases in values of property on the roll last year Does not include new construction Public Hearing & Publication of tax increase required if proposed tax rate is greater than the effective tax rate (changed by 2005 Legislature) Preliminary Effec#ive Tax Rate Based on estimated July 2005 tax roll (3% loss from May 2005 roll) Increases in the values of property on the roll last year less than 1 °'o Preliminary Effective Tax Rate Calculation approximately $ 0.57 FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 1 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED PRELIM ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004105 FY 2004105 FY 2005/06 REVENUES Taxes $22,005,941 $22,954,899 $23,075,296 $22,665,056 $23,093,775 Fines & Forfeitures 1,582,165 1,775,902 1,728,080 1,732,080 1,798,500 Licenses & Permits 1,665,390 1,606,447 1,556,140 1,469,210 1,503,500 Charges for Service 1,954,556 1,831,681 1942,142 1,894,296 2,024,843 Intergovernmental 3,004,728 3,164,230 3,280,885 3,280,885 3,173,268 Miscellaneous 346,508 275,320 499,749 474,216 591,551 Sub-Total Revenues $30,559,288 $31,608,479 $32,082,292 $3:1,515,743 $32,185,437 Appropriation -Settlement 0 0 0 650,000 650,000 Appropriation -Ins. Reserve 0 Q 347,250 347,250 103,800 Appropriation - PY Enc. 0 0 0 394,734 0 TOTAL REVENUES $30,559,288 $31;608,479 $32,429,542 $32,907,727 $32,939,237 EXPENDITURES City Council $138,493 $157,044 $159,615 $158,715 $146,713 City Manager 479,416 501,894.' 486,165 485,031 508,351 Communications 490,410 475,64$ 487,279 478,373 491,411 City Secretary 392,590 405;550 426,846 423,329 447,036 Legal 635,829 637,012 500,033 499,480 500,033 Human Resources 99;687 99,506 111,576 108,367 116,217 Finance 703,277 733,335 756,933 749,390 774,490 Budget&Research '294,005 315,230 313,069 311,289 330,705 Municipal Court 1,C?14,774 992,842 1,021,482 1,017,805 1,093,866 Inspections 570,064 585,520 644,824 622,373 673,459 Planning 366',301 233,809 233,398 206,837 239,770 Economic Development 93,826 95,501 100,787 100,787 105,212 Library 1, 388,844 1,457,168 1,479,744 1,473,060 1,573,430 Neighborhood Services 1.,047,875 1,262,090 1,348,558 1,315,760 1,467,552 Public Works 2`,909,068 2,278,244 2,879,116 2,750,096 3,183,930 Parks & Recreafit~n 2,421,367 2,346,225 2,422,296 2,371,689 2,488,845 Police 8,239,758 8,540,424 8,799,788 8,634,227 9,145,848 Fire 7,213,801 7,330,422 7,890,793 7,881,351 8,369,995 Building Services 867,150 845,124 787,377 787,377 826,746 Non-Departmental 712,568 868,304 988,711 927,711 1,013,918 Sub-Total Departments $30,078,897 $30,160,892 $31,838,390 $31,303,047 $33,497,527 Reserve for Capital Improvements 450,000 550,000 150,000 150,000 550,000 Market Adjustment 0 0 67,926 0 75,000 Legal Settlement 0 0 0 650,000 650,000 Insurance Reserve Policy 0 0 347,250 347,250 103,800 Previous Year Encumbrances 394,734 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $30,528,897 $30,710,879 $32,403,566 $32,845,031 $34,876,327 BALANCE $30,391 $897,600 $25,976 $62,696 ($1,937,090) Page 1 of 6 FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 2 -SUMMARY OF REVENUES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED PRELIM ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 TAXES Current Property Taxes $9,013,449 $9,720,352 $10,183,013 - $10,183,013 $10,845,065 Delinquent Property Taxes 140,545 280,075 142,050 142,050 150,000 Penalty and Interest 115,129 160,925 98,483 98,483 100,000 Franchise Fees 3,684,707 3,592,6$2_ 3,443,000 3,391,748 3,284,000 Utility Fund Franchise Taxes 547,421 558,976 ' " 595,942 595,942 582,485 Sales Taxes 8,082,777 8,215,889. 8,204,423 7,845,435 7,722,225 Mixed Beverages 114,122 107,164 1.10,000 110,000 110,000 Payment in Lieu of Taxes 307,791 318,856 ' .298,385 298,385 300,000 Sub-Total $22,005,941 $22,954,899'rr' $23,075,296 $22,665,056 $23,093,775 FINES AND FORFEITURES Municipal Court Fines $1,303,005 $'1,481,248 51,426,080 $1,426,080 $1,483,500 Library Fines 61,046 60,561 58,000 57,000 60,000 Warrant & Arrest Fees 218,114 234,093 244,000 249,000 255,000 Sub-Total $1,582,165 $1,775,9Q2 $1,728G80 $1,732,080 $1,798,500 LICENSES AND PERMITS Building Permits $680668 $669,572 $630,000 $630,000 $650,000 Electrical Permits 72,514 57,946 60,000 63,000 60,000 Plumbing Permits $Q348 72,925 68,000 75,000 73,000 Mechanical Permits 35;040 49,697 38,500 45,000 44,000 Miscellaneous Permits 71,998' 79,180 70,800 65,850 65,850 Apartment Inspection Fees 0 47,641 79,200 79,200 81,500 Curb & Drainage Insp. Fees 119,820 '100,192 121,000 60,000 60,000 Re-Inspection Fees' ! 9,510 17,940 12,000 16,250 14,000 License Fees 15,303 15,500 12,000 14,500 14,000 Contractor Registrafion Fees 86,640 83,334 84,000 72,000 70,000 Plan Review/Application Fee 1.32;187 94,275 89,000 45,000 45,000 Animal License/Adoption Fees 76,975 72,079 79,540 72,260 70,250 Animal Control Impoundment 56,558 56,163 53,500 53,500 82,000 Crematorium Revenues '!5,533 5,021 4,500 4,000 4,200 Auto Impoundment Fees 55,893 15,371 0 15,000 0 Food Service Permits 99,108 101,660 91,000 95,550 101,000 Food Managers School 10,535 15,720 13,000 14,000 15,000 Fire Inspection/Alarm Fees 23,610 20,132 17,000 16,000 19,500 Publicity Fees -Recreation 33,150 32,099 33,100 33,100 34,200 Sub-Total $1,665,390 $1,606,447 $1,556,140 $1,469,210 $1,503,500 Page 2 of 6 FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 2 -SUMMARY OF REVENUES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED PRELIM ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 CHARGES FOR SERVICE Park Facility Rental $3,485 $6,620 $3,450 $3,450 $5,740 Recreation Center Rental 13,310 11,222 17,000"' 14,120 14,120 Ambulance Fees 935,631 932,246 960OQ0 987,000 1,069,860 Garbage Billing 248,858 235,236 230,000 230,000 230,000 Contributions 10,000 10,000.. 10,000 10,000 10,000 Maps & Codes 666 126 ' 3D0 150 150 Recreation Fees 408,680 355,401 464,107 399,171 421,717 Cultural Arts 6,368 14,129 6,500 6,500 7,000 Athletic Revenue 148,667 126,120 112,255 105,641 126,606 Recreation Special Events 34,897 8,586 11,530 12,764 14,500 Planning & Zoning Fees 42,044 30,364 30,000 32,000 30,000 Sale of Accident Reports 27,093 27,619 .25,000 23,500 25,000 Vital Statistics 54,861 56,676 53,000 53,000 53,000 Mowing 14, 562 16,81' 1 18, 000 17,000 17,150 Non-Resident Library Fees 0 0 0 0 0 Video Services Income 4,930 500 ' 500 0 0 Video Tape Sales 504 25 500 0 0 Sub-Total $1,954,556 $1,831,681 $1.,942,142 $1,894,296 $2,024,843 INTERGOVERNMENTAL Indirect Costs: General CIP $105,000 $105,000 $155,000 $155,000 $155,000 Utility Fund 1,183,964 1,222,164 1,283,271 1,283,271 1,321,769 Park & Rec Facilities Dev. Corp. 230,076 241,582 253,659 253,659 261,269 Crime Control District 382,800 401,940 401,942 401,942 300,000 Aquatic Park Fund 85;800 90,084 94,588 94,588 97,426 Direct Cost- General Fund 1,037,088 1,103,460 1,092,425 1,092,425 1,037,804 Police Department S2laries Sub-Total $3,004,728 $3;164,230 $3,280,885 $3,280,885 $3,173,268 MISCELLANEOUS Interest Income $$8,538 $66,181 $83,500 $83,500 $285,000 Sale of City Property 9,184 3,286 0 0 0 Grant Proceeds-Grim. Justice 62,556 6,955 79,000 79,000 12,000 Grant Proceeds-CDBG 0 49,874 25,000 36,500 50,000 Overtime Reimbursements 9,801 11,698 9,800 6,000 7,000 Tax Attorney Fees 49,998 79,756 35,000 35,000 50,000 Other Income 106,727 44,012 37,551 31,551 37,551 Sponsorships (Fire) 0 0 27,233 0 0 Special Invest. Fund Loan Payment 19,604 13,558 52,665 52,665 0 SRO Reimbursement (BISD) 0 0 150,000 150,000 150,000 Sub-Total $346,508 $275,320 $499,749 $474,216 $591,551 Appropriation -Legal Settlement 0 0 0 650,000 650,000 Appropriation -Insurance Reserve 0 0 347,250 347,250 103,800 Appropriation-P/Y Encumbrances 0 0 0 394,734 0 TOTAL REVENUES $30,559,288 $31,608,479 $32,429,542 $32,907,727 $32,939,237 Page 3 of 6 FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 3 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED PRELIM ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002103 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 City Council $138,493 $157,044 $159,615 $158,715 $146,713 City Manager 479,416 501,894 '486,165 485,031 508,351 Communications Public Information 207,152 201,645 197,902 196,149 198,645 Citicable 283,258 274,03 ' 289,377 282,224 292,766 Total Communications 490,410 475,648 487,279 478,373 491,411 City Secretary City Secretary 220,360 231,198 238,919 236,702 254,005 Record Management 172,230 174,352 187,927 186,627 193,031 Total City Secretary 392,590 405,550 426846 423,329 447,036 Legal 635,829 637,012 500,033 499,480 500,033 Human Resources 99,687 99,506 11 1,576 108,367 116,217 Finance Accounting & Administration 486,679 509,375 52T,756 522,430 536,035 Purchasing 216,598 22396Q .'229,177 226,960 238,455 Total Finance 703,277 733,335 756,933 749,390 774,490 Budget & Research Budget 78,446 80,641 83,914 82,860 96,527 Tax 179,136 202,193 187,801 187,801 191,940 Internal Audit 36',423' 32,396 41,354 40,628 42,238 Total Budget & Research 294,005 315,230 313,069 311,289 330,705 Municipal Court AdministrationProsecution 337,290 289,360 270,545 271,929 303,273 Court Records 280;534 286,482 317,493 320,684 330,440 Warrants. 269,342 288,200 297,344 290,417 313,829 Teen Court 52,595 54,643 58,540 57,215 62,863 Judicial 75,013 74,157 77,560 77,560 83,461 Total Municip~t Court 1,014,774 992,842 1,021,482 1,017,805 1,093,866 Inspections 570,064 585,520 644,824 622,373 673,459 Planning 366,301 233,809 233,398 206,837 239,770 Economic Development 93,820 95,501 100,787 100,787 105,212 Library General Services 184,491 185,990 198,268 197,149 195,337 Public Services 643,559 687,894 657,860 654,155 743,892 Technical Services 560,794 583,284 623,616 621,756 634,201 Total Library 1,388,844 1,457,168 1,479,744 1,473,060 1,573,430 Page 4 of 6 FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 3 -SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED PRELIM ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003!04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005106 Neighborhood Services Neighborhood Resources $265,357 $264,115 $258,779 $253,077 $280,336 Humane Division 555,479 566,610 "rr'S76,944 551,839 629,384 Consumer Health 227,039 228,428 258,283 250,220 273,352 Code Enforcement 0 202,937 254,552 260,624 284,480 Total Neighborhood Services 1,047,875 1,262,090 1,348,558 1,315,760 1,467,552 Public Works General Services 131,774 130;039. 144,755 143,902 150,314 Traffic Control 800,755 844,897 ..894,433 834,534 903,496 Street & Drainage 1,976,539 1,303,30$ 1,839,928 1,771,660 2,130,120 Total Public Works 2,909,068 2,278,244 2,879,116 2,750,096 3,183,930 Park & Recreation General Services 137,271 151,787 122,788 87,675 122,807 Parks Maintenance 1,020,378 993,944 4-,041,982 1,033,830 1,044,708 Recreation Services 730,110 750,244 786,816 782,156 832,779 Athletic Program Services 228,702 195,958 201,352 200,423 205,201 Senior Adult Services 146,524 142,890 149,688 148,624 156,062 Youth Outreach & Cultural 158,382 111,402 119,670 118,981 127,288 Total Park & Recreation 2,421,367 2.346,225 .2,422,296 2,371,689 2,488,845 Police General Services 440,680 463,298 480,007 443,957 481,122 Administrative Services 591,425 571,130 617,767 618,277 628,792 Criminal Investigation 1,641,212 1,731,717 1,761,657 1,694,262 1,829,012 Uniform Patrol 3,595,896 3,732,267 3,847,533 3,792,510 4,062,007 Tactical Unit 24,667 27,925 29,843 29,662 31,876 Technical Services 738,342 769,422 725,404 721,771 736,654 Detention Services 344,974 350,152 376,282 375,332 387,709 Property Evidence 111,191 114,921 119,237 117,917 125,278 Communications 751,371 779,592 842,058 840,539 863,398 Total Police 8,239,758 8,540,424 8,799,788 8,634,227 9,145,848 Fire Department General Services 244';642 261,899 272,322 271,762 284,505 Operations 5,338,265 5,589,230 6,104,567 6,093,169 6,507,835 Emergency Medical 813,978 694,242 798,109 798,660 847,572 Fire Inspections 381,692 374,887 387,170 387,353 404,048 Emergency Management 435,024 410,164 328,625 330,407 326,035 Total Fire 7,213,601 7,330,422 7,890,793 7,881,351 8,369,995 Page 5 of 6 FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 SCHEDULE 3 -SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED REVISED PRELIM ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 2002/03 FY 2003/04 FY 2004/05 FY 2004/05 FY 2005/06 Building Services $867,150 $845,124 $787,377 $787,377 $826,746 Non-Departmental 712,568 868,304 ! 988,711 927,711 1,013,918 Market Adjustment 0 0 67,926 0 75,000 Reserve for Capital Improvements 450,000 550,000 150,000 ....150,000 550,000 Legal Settlement 0 0 0 650,000 650,000 Operating Transfers Out 0 0 347,250 34T,250 103,800 PY Encumbrances 394,734 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $30,528,897 $30,710,892 $32,403,566 -.$32,845,031 $34,876,327 BALANCE $30,391 $897,587 $25,976 $62,696 ($1,937,090) Page 6 of 6 • UPCOMING ISSUES Growth in Library Materials In June 2005 the City Council awarded a bid for architectural services to design the City's new public library. It is anticipated that the new library will be complete sometime in the fall of 2007. The overall budget established for this project is $10.2 million and will provide for a facility of approximately 50,000 square feet in size with expansion possibilities up to 60,000 square feet. The current library is approximately 31,000 square feet and houses approximately 170,000 volumes. The issue at hand is that the current facility has very little room to grow its material capacity. It is unlikely that the library staff will be able to expand the number of volumes maintained until the new library is completed. In the FY 2004-05 Operating Budget, book buying was reduced and will likely continue for the next two years through FY 2006-07. When the new library is opened in the fall of 2007, it may be possible to then begin expanding our budget for book buying and allow the volumes to grow each year. Keep in mind that a large portion of the book purchase budget is for replacement or repairs on existing books, not just adding new books. It has been discussed that it would be beneficial for a book buying fund to be established now with the intended purpose of buying a large number of new books to place in the new library when it opens. Over the next few years, it might serve well to organize a community fund raising project. Questions: • Do we increase the size of the library collection? • What is a reasonable goal? • Would the Council favor creating a reserve to meet this goal? • Do we work with Library Board, Friends of the Library or other groups to raise this money? • Page 1 of 9 • UPCOMING ISSUES Reconstruction of Golf Greens at Iron Horse The Iron Horse Golf Course has been open for 13 years. While most of the facility is in good condition, the golf greens have begun to deteriorate. The average life span for a golf course green is ten to fifteen years. The golf greens at Iron Horse are 13 years old and are currently not in a competitive level with other area municipal and private golf course facilities. The City has known for the last several years that a reconstruction project of the greens was forthcoming. The City has received a growing number of complaints about the condition of our greens. Ever Green Alliance Golf Limited (EAGL), with the assistance of City staff, has researched the cost for reconstructing the golf course greens. Soil testing, as well as correspondence with area municipal and private golf course facilities, has helped determine the best strategy for replacement. A process similar to that used in the area is being recommended and involves the replacement of the existing 328 Bermuda grass with Champion (ultra-dwarf) Bermuda. The 328, which was developed in the 1960's, tends to mutate and over time provides no consistency in leaf tissue. It currently provides a bad ball roll. Another problem is that the 328 creates a hard subsurface with intense compaction that does not provide good drainage. . The Champion Bermuda was developed in the 1990's and has a smaller blade and leaf tissues. It provides for more aggressive growing, it is more cold tolerant in winter, and assures a smooth, quick roll of the ball. The estimated cost to reconstruct the approximately 130,000 square feet of greens is $75,000 to $80,000. The process involves spraying the greens to kill the existing Bermuda, intensely aerating the ground, adding supplements and soil enhancements, re-sprigging, and then sand leveling. The biggest challenge for both EAGL and City staff is that the process requires closing the golf course for approximately 10 weeks from July 1 through September 15 of 2006. This is the hottest time of year, but it is the time that allows for the fastest grow-in. It is also an off-peak usage time of the year. Assuming we would proceed with the proposed project, it is also recommended that we utilize the down time of the course to address a number of smaller projects that are difficult to remedy during the busy operation period. The projects include planting grass in eroded areas, painting, cart path repairs, etc. The current estimate for these various maintenance items (materials only) is $20,000. These items combined with the greens reconstruction will total $100,000. It is recommended that we utilize sales tax (4B) funds for this expense, and if approved, it would be included in the FY 2005-2006 Operating Budget. Page 2 of 9 • UPCOMING ISSUES Reconstruction of Golf Greens at Iron Horse (cont.l The proposed greens reconstruction process was used at Diamond Oaks Golf Course last summer. A recent trip to visit these greens confirmed the huge difference the grass can make and indicated the process is very successful. Also, the proposed process is underway at the Indian Creek Golf Course in Carrollton. The sprigging was done about two and a half weeks ago. So far, this too is a very successful project. As you can see by the scope of the proposed project, the largest impact to the City is the closing of the golf course and the resulting loss of revenue. The current projected loss of revenue with a two and a half month closure of the golf course is $596,398. Some expenses can be curtailed during this time period as is expected, but not enough to affect the entire revenue loss. Most of the golf course maintenance crew will need to stay on to perform general mowing as well as the additional maintenance projects. The total estimated reduction in expenditures for the two and one half month period is $144,945. Staff is currently developing a plan to cover the loss in revenue, but at this time, those details are not available. Both the EAGL staff and City staff have developed a budget for FY 2005-2006 that includes the cost of reconstructing the greens and another that does not. Although a • difficult project to accomplish financially, staff believes that we must reconstruct the greens in order to maintain or improve our market share in this golf course industry. When the proposed project is completed, staff estimates green fees can be increased by 5 - 10 % due to the much improved golfing conditions. Of course, no realization of improved revenues will be experienced until FY 2006-2007. Questions: • Is the City Council supportive of using sales tax (4B) funds to pay for the greens reconstruction? • Is the City Council supportive of using sales tax (4B) funds to pay for lost revenue? • Is a re-prioritization of parks projects an option to assist the golf course? Page 3 of 9 • UPCOMING ISSUES Proposed Contract with Evergreen Alliance Golf Limited, L.P. (EAGL) for Golf Course Management Services Since the opening of Iron Horse Golf Course in 1992, the City has contracted with EAGL to provide management services. Although the name has changed through the years due to company buy-outs, the same firm has provided services for the City through good years and a few tough years. When the course first opened, there was very little competition for play in this northeast section of Tarrant County. In recent years, this has changed. Iron Horse now competes aggressively with several other municipal courses in our area, as well as with a few private courses. The current contract with EAGL is a five year contract due to terminate on December 1, 2005. Staff has given careful consideration to issuing a request for proposals to consider contracting with other outside management firms; however, at this time, it is felt that it will be in the City's best interest to renegotiate a new contract with EAGL, probably with different terms more advantageous to the City. There are a couple of significant reasons why we believe this. First, if the City is going to proceed with the greens reconstruction project in the next fiscal year, it will be a very tough year financially. We will need EAGL's expertise and commitment to the golf • course to get over the hurdles. Bringing in a new management company in the year we do this would not be recommended. EAGL has a very long track record of their commitment to Iron Horse as is exemplified through some of the recognition we have received through the years. Second, the process proposed for the greens reconstruction is something they are very familiar with. EAGL currently manages Diamond Oaks Golf Course and did so through last year's reconstruction of their greens. They are also managing Indian Creek Golf Course in Carrollton where the process is currently underway. The subcontractor used at both of these courses has provided the reconstruction under the direction of EAGL. It is proposed to use the same subcontractor as has been used for both of these golf courses as well as many others around the state of Texas. Although the terms of a potential new contract have not yet been negotiated, there is a general understanding that if we choose to proceed, we will attempt to prepare a new three (3) year contract. It would be structured much differently from the existing contract in that it would seek to have improved partnership qualities. Basically, if the golf course does well, EAGL would be paid proportionately, and if the golf course does not do well, they will share in the losses. This would give EAGL added incentive to provide better service and allow for improved accountability of finances. At this time, they are receptive to negotiating a contract under these terms. Another proposed change is to have a contract that coincides exactly with the fiscal ear of the Ci As m n i e t oned the r . Y ty cur ent contract ends on December 1 rather than on October 1, which is the beginning of our fiscal year. If the City Council is in agreement, Page 4 of 9 • staff would prepare an agreement that ends the current contract on September 30 and begins a new contract on October 1, 2005, for a three (3) year period. The purpose of this discussion item is to seek consensus to authorize staff to negotiate a new agreement with EAGL. Questions: • Is the City Council supportive of considering a new contract with EAGL? • If so, can staff begin negotiations? • Are there particular terms the City Council would be interested in including? • Page 5 of 9 • UPCOMING ISSUES Options for North/South Recreation Center Facilities There are several uncertainties about when and where the City will provide Recreation Center facilities improvements. It is generally understood that the City will construct a new Recreation Center in Home Town, but the timing has been delayed for some years and it may be as long as 2008 before the TIF#2 will produce enough revenue to sustain the debt of the proposed $21.9 million facility. It has also been considered that the City would provide future Recreation Center facilities on the south end of the City. The uncertainties of such a southern project are even greater. It has not been decided exactly what the nature of the facility would be. Will it be a cooperative effort with the City of Richland Hills near or along South Grapevine Highway? Will it be built in the old Food Lion? Will it be built as a new building? Or, is there a need to provide a Recreation Center on the south side at all? The purpose of this item is to discuss options for initiating preliminary studies. Given that the City is several years behind in getting these projects started, we believe it is important to have many decisions made prior to beginning actual construction. Concerning the new Recreation Center in Home Town, the proposed project called for a 100,000 square foot facility to be built at a cost of $21.9 million. Elements were to include the following: o Double gymnasium o Indoor running/walking track o Fitness center o Banquet room o Weight room o Indoor pool/leisure pool o Classrooms o Rock climbing wall o Dance room o Instructional kitchen o Aerobic rooms o Concession area o Pre-school/day care room o Lockers and showers o Game room o Administrative office Current time projections for the new Recreation Center are that debt may be issued in 2008 to fund the construction. In this scenario, it might be 2010 before a facility could be ready. Staff would like the opportunity to consider all options for expediting a new Recreation Center, including considering other feasible options and actual operational costs. Concerning the feasibility of constructing a Recreation Center on the south side of the City, staff would like to hire a recreational facility planner to assist the City in identifying options to include cost estimates for each option and operational costs for a new, smaller recreation center to serve areas south of Loop 820. • Page6of9 • UPCOMING ISSUES Options for North/South Recreation Center Facilities (cont.) Questions: • Is Council supportive of studying recreational facility opportunities in both north and south areas of NRH? • Should we move up timeline for opening new facilities? If so, how much? • Page 7 of 9 • UPCOMING ISSUES Natural Gas Exploration In the late 1990's, the Northeast Tarrant County area began a boom in natural gas drilling. This was the result of the discovery of Barnett Shale Gas Field located under most of the Dallas/Fort Worth area. In recent years, most of our surrounding neighbors, including Richland Hills, Haltom City and Fort Worth, have adopted ordinances regulating gas drilling in their city limits and in some cases, allowed for drilling on city property. Drilling on city property has allowed cities to generate needed revenues to provide city services. Recently the City of Richland Hills received a signing bonus of $354,000 from Four Sevens Oil Company in Fort Worth to drill for natural gas on city property. Currently the State of Texas allows natural gas drilling within municipal limits. The law gives loose guidelines on what precautions companies must take. A local ordinance can be passed to further regulate gas drilling to ensure the safety and health of citizens. Eventually the natural gas drilling boom will impact the City of North Richland • Hills and there are two major issues to consider: Questions: ¦ Should staff prepare an ordinance for consideration that would ensure NRH residents are protected should gas drilling occur in our community? ¦ And would these ordinances be part of code of ordinances or zoning ordinances? ¦ Should the City Council instruct staff to initiate the leasing of all mineral rights held by the City and allow natural gas drilling on City property? • Page 8 of 9 • UPCOMING ISSUES Outsourcing The City of North Richland Hills recently outsourced the mowing of parks and other city property. This is just one of the many key areas the City has outsourced. Other key outsourcing measures include ambulance billing, the slurry seal and overlay programs, trash collection, tax collection, utility bill printing and mailing, and lock box collection services. Outsourcing has allowed the City Departments to focus on core functions and concentrate on implementing the City Council Goals and Objectives. City staff would like input from City Council on identifying future outsourcing needs. Questions • What areas is the City Council willing to explore? • What cost-saving threshold would be reasonable for considering outsourcing? • Page 9 of 9 UPDATES Internal Service Plans Council and Management realize the importance of Maintenance and Replacement of City Facilities and Equipment. Each year management and staff update the Multi-Year Internal Service Plans. Plans include the cost of Internal Service Funds operations, maintenance and capital replacement. City Departments are charged for the maintenance upkeep and replacement of vehicles, equipment, facilities and computer and telecommunications equipment and systems. These plans assume no property tax rate increase and pay-as-you- go funding where possible. The Equipment Replacement & Maintenance Plan is a ten-year plan which includes replacement and maintenance of Police, Fire and Support Services vehicles and equipment. This was a $32 million dollar plan in fiscal year 2005. No debt has been issued for equipment replacement since 1998. A preliminary cash flow analysis indicates that debt may need to be issued for equipment replacement beginning in fiscal year 2006. The fiscal year 2006 proposed budget includes the replace of the following vehicles and equipment for which debt financing is proposed: Aerial Ladder Truck $900,000, Ambulance Replacement $205,000; replace 2 Dump Trucks, a Backhoe, and a Roller totaling over • $300,000. This plan will be discussed at the July 29-30 Budget Workshop. Building Operating and Capital Maintenance Plan is a ten-year plan which includes ongoing upkeep and capital maintenance of city facilities. This was a $22 million dollar plan in FY 2005. No debt has been Issued for facility capital maintenance since 1998. A preliminary cash flow analysis indicates that the plan can be continued on apay-as-you-go basis. Other Multi-Year Internal Service Fund Financial Plans include the Insurance Reserve Replacement Plan and the Information Services Computer & Telecommunications Operating & Equipment Replacement Plan. These plans are evaluated and updated each year by management and staff. Page 1 of 6 UPDATES Utility Rate Study The last time a rate study was done and water and sewer rates were increased was 1994. In the fiscal year 2004 budget Council approved a Water and Sewer Rate Study. A decision was made in 2004 to wait until the Utility Master Plan and Impact Fee Study was completed before completing the Water and Sewer Rate Study. This was done to be able to determine which CIP projects could be funded from impact fees and which needed to be funded from water and sewer rates. The Utility Master Plan and Impact Fees were approved in April of 2005. The Water and Sewer Rate Study includes the cost of water and sewer services. Cost considerations include operations and maintenance, Fort Worth & TRA Services and system improvements governed by the CIP Plan. The CIP plan includes water and sewer rehabilitation, the meter replacement plan and various projects identified in the master plan. Rate Considerations include the base rate (minimum charges), volume rates (actual use) and pass through rates (increases in TRA & Fort Worth services. The rate study will consider the affect on customer bills. Customer classifications . include residential, commercial and apartments. The study will compare proposed rates with existing rates and compare proposed rates with rates of surrounding cities. New rates will be based on fairness and reasonableness. The City will phase in increases to minimize the affect on customers. The City will use the Rate Stabilization Reserve to soften the impact of rate increases. This reserve was established by the City Manager several years ago to be used for this very purpose. The current balance of the Rate Stabilization Reserve is $1.2 million. Any rate increases will be implemented in the fall or winter to minimize impact on customer bills. The results of Rate Study will be presented at the July 25th Pre-Council meeting. The FY 2006 Proposed Utility Fund Budget to be presented at Budget Workshop July 29th and 30th will include proposed rates and pass through rates. An ordinance with proposed rates will be presented for council approval in fall of 2005. Page 2 of 6 UPDATES Lona Ranae Utility CIP The city recently had a Water and Wastewater Master Plan and an Impact Fee Update prepared by Freese and Nichols, Inc. (F&N). The master plan and impact fee update showed the system improvements that are going to be necessary for the city to meet the future water and wastewater demands. The future demands were based on population projections that indicate that the city of North Richland Hills could have a population at approximately 75,000 in the year 2020. The key improvements consist of constructing new water and wastewater lines, expanding booster pump stations, and providing additional ground storage at the Western Center Site. The total estimated cost for these improvements based on current dollars is $63,401,667. Impact fees will provide $17,168,560 towards the total cost, and the city currently has approved funding of $2,751,833 that can go towards the total cost. An additional $43,481,274 is going to be required to fund the remaining project costs and will be finance with utility rate revenues. • Page 3 of 6 i • UPDATES Animal Shelter Expansion This project entails the redesign and renovation of the existing 6,747 square foot animal shelter with an expansion of roughly 8,000 additional square feet. The City of Watauga's decision to opt out of the project has resulted in scaling back the size from the original 11,000 square foot expansion. The renovated and expanded facility is anticipated to provide a total holding capacity of 162 animals. The existing animal shelter houses on average 120-140 (102-120 without Watauga) animals daily with a current design capacity of 95. The project will provide additional kennel capacity, adoption areas, sick and incoming animal isolation rooms, a separate main entry and exit to reduce decontamination issues, as well as additional storage space and working areas. Currently the project has $1,835,914 in available funding. This includes $1,300,000 in General Obligation Bonds and $535,914 in reserves. The next step is to raise roughly $1,000,000 over the next year. In August city staff will issue a request for qualifications for fundraising program development and assistance and bring a contract for Council consideration shortly thereafter. The fund raising process is expected to take approximately one year. After the • fundraising effort is complete, staff will re-assess the total funds available to determine the final scope and scale of the project. • Page 4 of 6 . UPDATES NRH?O Strategic Master Pian In the approved Capital Budget for FY 2004-05, the City Council authorized funds to prepare a Strategic Master Plan for NRH2O Waterpark. In December 2007 the City Council then authorized a contract for these services to be provided by William Haralson and Associates. The purpose of this status report is to update the City Council on the progress of the plan. NRH2O is in its eleventh year of operation. Except for the initial feasibility study and master plan, there has not been a comprehensive planning study performed by outside experts. The primary purpose of the study is to prepare a market and financial evaluation including a marketing strategy that will be used to help guide the operation of the water park for the next five operating seasons. The plan is to include the following work products: o Fina{ version of the feasibility study o Master plan showing placement of new facilities o Recommended theming o Estimated development costs o Admission price structure o Marketing strategy o Sponsorship strategy o Economic impact o Evaluation of complementary uses o Evaluation of existing facilities o Industry information and trends o Other issues as identified Although the plan is not yet complete, we wi{I revea{ a few of the major recommendations. Page 5 of 6 • UPDATES Tax Increment Reinvestment Zones 1 and 2 The Boards of TIF 1 and TIF 2 met on June 21, 2005. Fiscal Year 2004 financial reports were presented and approved. Since creation the real property values in TIF 1 have increased by $5.6 million. When TIF 1 was created in 1998 to help save the Richland Plaza development, the property values were $1.1 million. The TIF made drainage improvements in the amount of $850,000 which diverted flooding water off the parking lot. Shortly thereafter the center was renovated and the name changed to North Richland Hills Village Center. Current value of the real property is $6,717,796. Business personal property value is estimated at $1 million. Over 600 new jobs have been created and 8 tenants occupy over one third of the 300,000 square foot center. Since creation of TIF 2 in 1999, property values have increased nearly $100 million. Since 1999 TIF 2 has collected $3.1 million in property taxes. $1.1 million in property taxes were collected in 2005. TIF 2 is now able to support the Library Project which is underway. • Page 6 of 6 INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 2005-005 Date: December 31, 2004 ~-~.F--, Subject: Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 I' Executive Summary For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2004 Attached for your information is "Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1, Annual Report, For the Year Ended September 30, 2004". TIRZ No. 1 was created by the City of North Richland Hills in 1998. The District was created to provide public drainage improvements around the 300,000 square foot Richland Plaza Shopping Center (since renamed Richland Business Centre). The shopping center had declined to the point that nearly all tenants had vacated, and total values were a little over $1 million. It was believed that unless public drainage improvements were made to divert flooding from the Richland Plaza parking lot to Mackey Creek, the development was destined to further decay and decline. At the time the District was created, the City of NRH, Birdville Independent School District, Tarrant County, Tarrant County College, and Tarrant County Hospital District all agreed to participate at 100% for the life of the District. Certificates of Obligation were sold in the amount of $850,000 for the TIF portion of the $1.3 million public drainage project (the balance was paid by the City of NRH). The TlF debt has a maturity of twenty years to 2018, with aten-year call option in 2008. The TlF plan provides for the retirement of all outstanding debt at the call date if sufficient revenues are collected over the ten-year period. The Certificates were issued in 1998 and the public drainage improvements were completed in fiscal year 2000. In fiscal year 2004, the District received taxes in the amount of $157,634 from property owners. For the year ending September 30, 2004, outstanding principal and interest on the Certificates totaled $800,480. Principal, interest and associated payments totaled $73,398 for fiscal year 2004, and the end of the year cash balance was $317,276. Also attached to this executive summary is a "Comparison of Original Plan to Actual Development". The comparison shows that by the end of fisca{ year 2005 cumulative revenues (property taxes and interest earnings) will be 102% of the original plan. Public improvements were completed on schedule, and the associated debt was issued in a timely manner. The comparison shows that improvement value (Captured Valuation} is greater than originally estimated. Values as of January 2004 (fiscal year 2005) stayed the same as the January 2003 values, and are nearly $190,000 higher than originally estimated. 2003 values had declined from 2002 values due to a protest in values by property owners and a subsequent adjustment by the TAD Appraisal Review Board based on that protest. As note 2 indicates, if the current values hold steady and property owners pay the taxes on the TIF 1 properties, the plan to pay off the bonds in 2008 is viable. ISSUER BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS ~ The Annual Report is filed with the Attorney General's Office as required by state law. This • executive summary and attachments are provided to all the participating taxing jurisdictions. If you have any questions regarding this information please contact Larry Koonce, Director of Finance, City of NRH, at 817-427-6167 or e-mail Ikoonce(a~nrhtx.cam. Respectfully submitted, (f r`--.~ Larry Koonce Director of Finance Attachments: TIRZ No.1 Annua{ Report FY 2004 Comparison of Original TIF No. 1 Plan to Actual Development • • City of North Richland Hills Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 Annual Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2004 (unaudited) •The following are the items required by the Section 311.016 of the Texas Property Tax Code to be reported to the Office of the Attorney General: Amount & Source of Revenue in the Tax Increment Fund FY 2004: Property Tax Revenues $ 157,634 Interest Income $ 2,730 Total Revenues in Fiscal Year 2004 $ 160,364 Amount and Purpose of Expenditures of the Fund FY 2004: Principal, Interest, Issuance & Paying Agent Payments on Certificate Indebtedness $ 73,398 Total Fund Expenditures in Fiscal Year 2004 $ 73,398 Principal & Interest due on outstanding indebtedness as of September 30, 2004: Principal Outstanding $ 594,161 Interest Outstanding $ 206,319 Total Principal & Interest Outstanding 9-30- 2004 $ 800,480 Captured Appraised Value shared by the Municipality 8~ Other Taxing Entities and total amount of tax increments received Captured Tax Revenue 1998 Base Year Taxable Value Appraised Rate/$100 Received FY Taxing Unit Appraised Value 2003 Value 2003 FY 2004 2004 City of North Richland Hills $1,152,929 $6,717,796 $5,564,867 $0.570000 $31,720 Birdville I.S.D. $1,152,929 $6,717,796 $5,564,867 $1.617000 $89,894 Tarrant County $1,152,929 $6,717,796 $5,564,867 $0.272500 $15,164 Tarrant County Hospital District $1,152,929 $6,717,796 $5,564,867 $0.235397 $13,100 Tarrant County College $1,152,929 $6,717,796 $5,564,867 $0.139380 $7,756 $157,634 This report submitted by Larry Koon /3 ' ~ ~c- • Director of Finance City of North Richland Hills, Texas K:acctltifs\TIF1 Annual Report 2004.x1s ' City of North Richland Hills Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 Comparison of Original Plan to Actual Development FY 2004 Original Financing Plan 1998 Fiscal Captured Tax Interest Total Certificate Cumulative Year Valuation Revenues Earnings Revenues Debt Coverage 1999 $ 2,500,000 $ 65,678 $ 30,863 $ 96,541 $ 96,541 2000 $ 5,375,000 $ 141,207 $ - $ 141,207 I $ 81,998 $ :59;209 2001 $ 5,375,000 $ 141,207 $ - $ 141,207 $ 79,813 92U;.+aD.3 2002 $ 5,375,000 $ 141,207 $ - $ 141,207 $ 77,628 ~ 184;982 2003 $ 5,375,000 $ 141,207 $ - $ 141,207 $ 75,443 $ >249;94fii 2004 $ 5,375,000 $ 141,207 $ - $ 141,207 $ 73,257 39:7;896:. 2005 $ 5,375,000 $ 141,207 $ - $ 141,207 $ 71,072 $ _ 388;039 2006 $ 5,375,000 $ 141,207 $ - $ 141,207 $ 68,887 $ 460;35:1 2007 $ 5.375,000 $ 141,207 $ - $ 141,207 $ 66,702 $:::::534;$56 2008 $ 5,375,000 $ 141,207 $ - $ 141,207 $ 489,516 2 '186;647 Financing Plan As of September 30, 2004 (After Six Years) Interest Fiscal Captured Property Tax Earnings 8~ Total Certificate Cumulative Year Valuation Revenues Other Revenues Debt Coverage 1999 $ - $ - $ 54,620 $ 54,620 $ 98,259 :{43;639): 2000 $ - $ - $ 47,253 $ 47,253 $ 82,228 (:78;8'14.) 2001 $ 5,975,103 $ 164,558 $ 9,917 $ 174,475 $ 79.954 ::1:6;907: 2002 $ 6,566,861 $ 180,921 $ 160 $ 181,081 $ 77,768 119;220> 2003 $ 6,533,845 $ 184,991 $ 1.682 $ 186,673 $ 75,583 23Q;3~t} 2004 $ 5,564,867 $ 157,634 $ 2.730 $ 160,364 $ 73,398 $ 347;276 2005 $ 5,564,867 ~ $ 157,557 $ - $ 157,557 $ 71,213 $ 4Q3;:621 2006 $ 5,564,867 $ 157,557 $ - $ 157,557 $ 69,027 $:'::4$2.;60 2007 $ 5,564,867 $ 157,557 $ - $ 157,557 $ 66,842 $...::::582.;866:: 2008 $ 5,564,867 $ 157,557 $ - $ 157,557 $ 466,242 2 $ 274;980:: 1 Fiscal year 2005 Captured Valuation is based on the most current 2004 TAD values after ARB ad'ustments. The T1F District will r i ece ved final values in March 2005 at which time each taxing jurisdiction was be billed. • 2 The the $850,000 Certificates of Obligation sold in 1998 for drainage improvements were twenty- yearobligations maturing in 2018. The plan provides for the redemption of outstanding bonds on the call date in 2008 if funds are available. If the current values hold steady and property owners pay the taxes on the TIF properties, the plan to pay off the bonds in 2008 is viable. K:acct/tifs/TIF1 Annual Report 20040rig Plan vs actual INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. 2005-006 Date: December 31, 2004 Subject: Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 2 Executive Summary for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2004 Attached for your information is "Tax increment Reinvestment Zone No. 2, Annual Report, For the Year Ended September 30, 2004". TIRZ No.2 was created by the City of North Richland Hills in 1999. The District was created to provide public improvements that would benefit the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County College, Tarrant County and Tarrant County Hospital District. Planned public improvements include a conference center, a recreation center, a library and infrastructure improvements in the Hometown NRH development. Total public improvements are estimated at $65.2 million. The District was created for twenty-eight years to provide for the retirement of planned debt issuance for financing of the improvements. The City of NRH and TCC agreed to contribute 100% for the full twenty-eight years. The County and Hospital District agreed to participate up to a fixed dollar amount that was anticipated to accumulate over afifteen-year period based on estimated property values. At the time the District was created the main developer, E-Systems, estimated that Hometown NRH would be comprised of approximately 70% residential and 30% commercial and retail development. The District's boundaries also include other developments such as the Crossing (Kohl's) Center, Home Depot, Blue Line Ice and the Barnett property. The plan (based on a study done by Zimmerman/ Volk) estimated that property values would increase by over $370 million in ten years. Over the life of the District, the values are estimated to generate approximately $82.2 million in total tax revenues to fund the planned public improvements. The captured appraised value in 2003 (fiscal year 2004) was $80,423,374 for the City of NRH and $83,275,391 for Tarrant County. The differences are the exemptions granted by the taxing jurisdictions. The District received $1,013,513 from all taxing jurisdictions in fiscal year 2004. In April 2003, the City of North Richland Hills issued Certificates of Obligation in the amount of $1,450,000 for land acquisition, building program planning and architectural design services for the Hometown library, the first public improvement project scheduled in the TIF2 Project Plan. The City of North Richland Hills also acquired .221 acres within the TIF in October of 2002 for approximately $95,000 with TIF property tax revenues. This represents a portion of the land that will ultimately be acquired for the Hometown Library. The City of North Richland Hills plans to hire an architect for design services for the Hometown Library in 2005. Atso attached to this executive summary is a "Comparison of Original Plan to Actual Development". The report shows that actual property tax collections as compared to the original plan are lagging. Actual property tax revenues in fiscal year 2004 were $1,013,513 compared to the original plan estimate of $1,571,053. Taxes collected since inception total $1,984,273 compared to $3,561,077 estimated in the original plan. Cash and receivable balance including tax collections, interest earnings and certificate of obligation proceeds as of September 30, 2004 was $3,260,463. Tax revenues expected from participating jurisdictions in May of 2005 are $1,221,022 based on 2004 incremental value. The original plan estimated that $2,115,403 would be collected in 2005. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS The Annual Report is filed with the Attorney General's Office as required by state law. This executive .summary and attachments are provided to all the participating taxing jurisdictions. If you have any questions regarding this information please contact Larry Koonce, Director of Finance, City of NRH, at 817-427-6167 or a-mail Ikoonce cc.nrhtx.com. Respectfully submitted, Larry Ko~ ce Director of Finance Attachments: TIRZ No. 2 Annual Report FY 2004 Comparison of Original TIF No. 2 Plan to Actual Development • • • City of North Richland Hilis Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 2 Annual Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2004 (unaudited) The following are the items required by the Section 311.016 of the Texas Property Tax Code to be reported to the • Office of the Attorney General: Amount 8 Source of Revenue in the Tax Increment Fund FY 2004: Property Tax Revenues $ 1,013,513 Interest Income $ 25,081 Total Revenues in Fiscal Year 2004 $ 1,038,594 Amount and Purpose of Expenditures of the Fund FY 2004: Principal, Interest, Issuance & Paying Agent Payments on Certificate Indebtedness $ 95.096 Total Fund Expenditures in Fiscal Year 2004 $ 95,096 Principal 8~ Interest due on outstanding indebtedness as of September 30, 2004: Principal Outstanding $ 1,425,000 interest Outstanding $ 658.493 Total Principal & Interest Outstanding 9-30-2004 $ 2,083,493 Captured Appraised Value shared by the Municipality 8 Other Taxing Entities • and total amount of tax increments received Captured Tax Property Tax 1999 Base Year Taxable Value Appraised Rate/$100 Revenue FY Taxing Unit Appraised Value 2003 Value 2003 FY 2004 2004 City of North Richiand Hills $40,577,462 $121,000,836 $80,423,374 $0.570000 $458,413 Tarrant County $40,577,462 $123,852,853 $83,275,391 $0.272500 $226,925 Tarrant County Hospital District $40,577,462 $123,859,853 $83,282,391 $0.235397 $196,044 Tarrant County College $40,577,462 $123,852,853 $83,275,391 $0.139380 $104,252 $985,635 Total adjustments to billings $ (93,123) Payments from Blue Line Ice Settlement $ 121.001 Taxes Collected FY 2004 1,013 513 This report submitted by Larry KoonceV • Director of Finance City of North Richland Hills, Texas K:acct\tifs\TIF2 Annual Report 2005.x1s City of North Richland Hilis Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 2 Comparison of Original Plan to Actual Development • FY 2004 Origins! Financing Plan (First Five Years) dune 2~, 2000 Fiscal Property Tax Year Captured Valuation Revenues 2000 $ - $ - 2001 $ 12,620,987 $ 148,336 2002 $ 62,888,445 $ 739,138 2003 $ 93,808,805 $ 1.102,550 2004 $ 133,670,655 $ 1,571,053 2005 $ 179,985,905 $ 2,115,403 Total Planned Property Tax Revenues $ 5,676,480 Actua[ Development (First Five Years) Fiscal Property Tax Year Captured Valuation Revenues 2000 $ - $ - 2001 $3,523,615 $ 44,830 2002 $ 31,512,080 $ 288,774 2003 $ 58,118,922 $ 637,156 2004 $ 83,275,391 $ 1,013,513 . 2005 ~ 96,371,726 $ 1,142,872 Total Property Tax Revenues $ 3,127,145 K:acct/tifs/TIF2 Annual Report 20050rig Plan vs actual ets N?ainta+ned 600 Lane Miles of Stye ~o0 500 300 200 goo 0 NRH Bedford Grape`~ne Co1ley~lle NRH Ten Year Histo e 200 4 - 490 Southlak 200 2003 _ a8 7 Keller 2002 473 2001 - Euless 2000 _ 466 1999 199$ - 466 Haltom City 1997 - 466 1996 - 455 Hurst Watauga Richland Hills • • • I Library Visits 0 50, 000 100, 000 150, 000 200, 000 250, 000 300, 000 350, 000 Euless NRH Grapevine Bedford Keller Haltom City NRH Ten Year History 2005 - 260,000 Hurst 2004 - 264,455 2003 - 273,225 2002 - 267,760 Watauga 2001 - 235,856 2000 - 225,151 Southlake 1999 - 215,560 1998 - 226,760 Colleyville 1997 - 220,200 1996 - 228,490 Richland Hills Service ~~o,ooa police ~ZO,opO Galis far ~ao,ooo $o,aofa °0,000 Qo,ooo 20,000 0 NRH Euless Keller Nf; tN Ten Year Nisto Haltom City 121,186 2005 ~ 120 711 2004 ~ 114 525 Hurst 2003 2002 ~ 118,883 _ 11 a t2g0 Grape~ne 2001 635 2000.115, 1999 ~ 109,663 gedfard 1998 _ 108,331 1997 _ g7 ,794 5outhlake 1996 _ 97 ,038 Watauga _-----~J f! Richland Hills _ Co11eyN11e Service 8,004 Its for EMS and Fire 7,ooa Ca a,ooo 5,000 q,000 3,000 2,000 ~ ,000 0 Grape~ne NRH ~ EMS GALLS Bedford o FIRE GALi-S Hurst NRH Ten Year Hi$t° 2005 - 7 ,230 Haltom City 2004 - 6 ,996 2003 " 6'824 2002 - 5 ,560 Euless 5,505 20p1 - 2000 -4,264 Keller 4,221 1999 " - 1 g93 _ g,p50 Southlake 1997 - 7 ,684 1996 - 7 ,065 Richland Hills Go11ey~?11e Watauga • Number of Fire Stations s s ~ _ - J 2 _ _ 1 Grapevine NRH gedtord Hurst N_~ e_ Year Histo 2005 - 4 Haltom City 2004 - 4 2003 - 4 2002 - 4 Euless 2001 - 4 2000 - 4 Keller 1999 1998 - ~ Southlake 1997 4 1996 - 4 Richland Hi11s Colleyville Watauga ---J- died 7,000 g,00o Animals 'Han 5,000 ~,ooo _ 3,000 Z,OOa ~ _ ~ ,000 _ _ Watauga NRH Haltom City Hurst Bedford NR'n Year Histo 2005 - 6,000 Euless 2004 _ 5,462 2003 - 3,878 v+ne 2002 - 3,573 Grape 3,814 2001 - 2000.4,078 Keller 1 ggg _ 4,195 1998 " 4,345 1997 _3'918 Richland Hills 1996 - 2,439 Southlake NSA J.---- Co1leyNlle rj'A W atau9a - N1A _ ° - 120 aC~~ 100 Shelter Cap s0 so ao 20 0 NRH Haltom City Bedford Hurst NRH Ten Year H+sto Euless 2006 - g6 2004 - 96 Grape~ne 2003 - 96 2002 - 96 2001 _ g6 Keller 2000 - 96 1999 - 96 1998 - g6 Richland Hills 1997 _96 Grape~ne 1996 - 96 Southlake Contractwith Colleyv~Ne Contractwith Bedford Watauga Gontractwith NRH 450 Housing Starts 400 350 300 - 250 200 150 _ 100 _ _ 0 Keller NRH Euless Colley~lle NRH Ten Year Histo 2005 - 360 evine 2004 _ 310 Grap 2Q03 - 292 Southlake 2002 ! 334 2001 Hurst 200 9 _2297 199 1998 - 262 Bedford 1997 _ 255 1996 Haltom Clty Watauga NJA _ Richland Hills NIA Permits Number of guildin emadel and trades) $,OOo ew construction, 7,000 includes n 6,000 C 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 0 1,000 NRH Bedford Hurst GrapeNne NRH Ten Year His o 2005 - 6,775 southlake 2004 _ 6,696 2003 - 6,200 Euless 2002 - 5,675 2001 - 6,005 Kelier 2004 _5,958 1999 - 5,316 Cit 1998 - 5,413 Haltom Y 5 X090 1997 1996 - 5,410 ColleyHlle Watauga NIA Richland Hills NIA - and Maintained anal ~ aoo 2,000 of public s ace and corps ~ x,600 cres ~ , p 400 arks ~ open p ~ ,200 {includes p aoo ~,ooo 600 400 200 0 Grapevine NRH Southlake NRH Ten Year Histo Euless 720 2Q05 - 200a - 720 Keller 2003 - 7 0 2001 - 67 5 Hurst 200 2000 - 667 ColleyN?le 1999 - 667 1998 - 667 Cit 1 g97 - 664 Haltom y 1996 Bedford W atau9a Richland Hills T rai? Wiles 20 umber of NikelBike ~s s ~ - 2 o Grapevine Southlake Keller NRH Ten Year H15to NRH 11.93 2005 - 2Q0~ _ 11.19 Colleyv?11e 2003 _ 7.29 2002.5.86 2001 _5.86 Euless 5.86 2000 - 1 ggg _ 4'23 gedlord 3.7 3 1998 - 1997 -1.23 Hurst 1 gg6 -1.23 Watauga Haltom City _ - Richland Hills - • • Number of Parks 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 NRH Grapevine Hurst Southlake Euless Colleyville NRH Ten Year History 2005 - 27 Bedford 2004 - 25 2003 - 24 2002 -18 Keller 2001 -18 2000 -18 Watauga 1999 - 16 1998 -15 Haltom City 1997 -13 1996 -11 Richland Hills 70,000 ter Square Feet 60,400 Recreation Gen 50,400 A0,000 30,000 2o,aao 10,000 0 Keller Grape~ne Hurst Year Nisto NRH N'RQ~ e38 000 2D 38,ppp Bedford Zpp~ 2op3.38,ooQ 2002.38,ppp Haltom City 2pp~ ^ 3g,pOp 2000.3a,ooo 1999 " 38 }ppp Watauga 38,pp~ 1998 38,000 Euless ~ gg7 w 1996 " 38'ppp Richland Hills No recreation center Southlake ~ ter No recreation cen Nlle ~ J J_ Col1eY . . Long Range Utilities CIP System Assessments Facilities & $270,000 w s r Equipment ~ r rP $14,117,732 r r s ..~zrt, Water Lines ~k. 3, $30, 799, 250 - ~T ~ , ~x~ r : r~~~ a r .a4 t F~ Sewer Lines $18,214,685 ~ ti r. s„ City Taxable Value Per Capita and Tax Rates Rank City Value Per Capita Rank City lax Rate 1 Southlake 152,543 1 Watauga 0.58 2 Colleyville 132,966 3 Grapevine 113,698 3 Haltom City * 0.54 4 Keller 83,131 4 Hurst 0.50 5 Bedford 55,967 5 Euless * 0.50 ;F~~^ « ~ 6 Southlake 0.46 n~ g 7 Hurst 53,539 7 Keller 0.44 8 Richland Hills 48,992 8 Richland Hills 0.44 . 9 Euless 41,786 9 Bedford * 0.40 10 Watauga 40,174 10 Grapevine 0.36 11 Haltom City 35,497 11 Colleyville 0.35 Average 0.47 * Property Tax Rate relief from Sales Tax • CITY TAXES ON AVERAGE HOME Average Residential City Tax Value May Homestead Net Rate City Taxes on Rank City 2005 Exemption Value FY 2005 Average Home 1 Southlake 394,147 0% 394,147 0.462000 1,821 2 Colle ille 332,429 0% 332,429 0.347400 1,155 3 Keller 223,786 1% 221,548 0.444130 984 i. • 5 Bedford 150,383 0% 150,383 0.400757 603 6 Watau a 96,804 0% 96,804 0.580763 562 7 Gra evine 189,309 20% 151,447 0.363500 551 8 Hurst 129,433 20% 103,546 0.499000 517 9 Euless 129,243 20% 103,394 0.495000 512 ~ 10 Haltom Cit 83,958 10°l0 75,562 0.541730 409 10 Richland Hills 93,806 0°to 93,806 0.436297 409 Avera a 167,066 743 • Services Received for Average . CITY TAX BILL Annual Monthly NRH Average City Tax Bill (Average Home Value May 2005: $134,895) $ 654 $ 54.46 What this includes: 24 Hour Police Protection $ 106 $ 8.84 24 Hour Fire Protection and EMS $ 95 $ 7.93 Steet Maintenance $ 35 $ 2.89 Parks, Recreation & Cultural Arts $ 29 $ 2.43 Other Services, i.e. capital improvements $ 14 $ 1.14 Council and Administrative Services $ 19 $ 1.41 Library Services $ 18 $ 1.49 Financial Management $ 20 $ 1.69 Development, Planning & Code Enforcement $ 12 $ 0.98 i Animal Control and Environmental Services $ 16 $ 1.35 Muncipal Court Services $ 12 $ 1.03 Maintenance of City Facilities $ 9 $ 0.81 Property Tax Dollars for City Operations General Fund) $ 386 $ 32.13 • Property Tax Dollars for Capital Improvements to Public Infrastructure (Debt Service Fund) $ 268 $ 22.33 City TAX BILL Compared To Other Household Bills Household Bills Annual Monthly Description NRH Av Tax Bill $654 $54 Cable Av Monthl $495 $41 Standard Cable On Demand with 1 $852 $71 Premium channel America's Top 120 Satellite Dish Av $516 $43 with local channels Famil of 4 Movie $480 $40 Tickets onl • City Comparison of What 011@ C@11t of the Tax Rate Produces City Tax City Taxable Value Rate FY One Cent Rank City May 2005 2005 Produces 1 Gra evine 5,099,337,453 0.363500 $ 509,934 2 Southlake 3,798,317,827 0.462000 $ 379,832 4 Keller 2,843,095,185 0.444130 $ 284,310 . 5 Colleyville 2,792,283,023 0.347400 $ 279,228 6 Bedford 2,689,234,222 0.400757 $ 268,923 7 Euless 2,120,625,092 0.495000 $ 212,063 ' 8 Hurst 2,013,079,747 0.499000 $ 201,308 9 Haltom Ci 1,389,713,426 0.541730 $ 138,971 10 Watau a 962,174,682 0.580763 $ 96,217 11 Richland Hills 404,185,074 0.436297 $ 40,419 Percent Increase in Various Costs as compared to the Consumer Price Index 120 100 80 60 CPI -~-Health Care 40 _ - -i-Water/Sewer ~~--Electricity 20 - - _ 0 -,T- -T -r 1996 1997 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 -20 -40 i Budget Calendar July 22 -Certified Tax Roll Received from Tarrant County Appraisal District July 22 -Proposed Budget distributed to City Council July 29 -30 -Budget Worksession August 8 -Possible Public Hearing August 22 -Possible Public Hearing September 12 -Possible Public Hearing and Budget Adoption September 26 -Last regular Council meeting Budget can be adopted and program of planning for FY 2005106 gervices City G~uncil fury 5, 2005 FY 2003104 Fund Balances planning and Y 2005106 SeNices for F FY 200312004 Fund Ba?ances Balance pperating Funds $7,pg7,o17 General (Undesignated) 3,000,000 General (Designated for Econom~~ $ Development) $ 193,398 promotional $ 356,962 Donations (from Water bill) $ 338 104 $peciallnvestigations ~ 2~q,230 Drainage Utility $6,669,782 ParkDevelopment'n9aneP,~fem~$e ,~~v s :oos _ _ and galan~es 031204 F ~ FY 2~ Balance ~ cont.) erating F ands ~ X3,321,556 ~ ~p $1,923~18~ ~ Crime Control District 43 ~ ebt $e~ice ,480,0 ~ General ~ Fund WaterlSeWer utility Cash $ 537 X978 ! pperating Cash fund 11, er Utility WaterlSeW Construction, I, Restricted for petit ~ Rate Stabilizaother Cash ~ Reserve and 4 yes ices I Baran planning and Program of Serv I Jury 5, 2~5 FY 2003/2004 Fund Balances I Balance Operating Funds (cont.) $ 598,632 Golf Course Fund Aquatic Fund 1,162,708 ~ Reserves for Infrastructure $ Maintenance & Operation $ 550,000 Park Insurance $ 288 g43 Debt Service Reserve $ 102,226 Construction Fund $2103,777 Total s ~„y s, zoos Pia~~~~e am a~oy~am or sews - I~ ~ Y 2003/2004 Fund Balances F ~ Balance pperating Funds (cont.) $1,657,745 Building Services I~ $1,992,737 ~i Equipment Services $ 249,317 Insurance Fund $1,898,527 Information Services 6 Planning and Program of Services July 5, 2005 - _ - ~ - ga~ances p4 F and ance zpp312~ say I FY ands ~ 80° Capital Prole~t F Sand aving S project S galan~e Street Fund designated* arnin9s Un ects only) $ $86°924 interest E d I ible for street'PrO~ ect Sayings an (elig e Funds prof Balance designated* ~ prainag arnings ~n onlY) ~ 705,512 interest E ects (eligible for street proj $ 541,826 AS You_Go Rese~e ~ Pay ital Facilities and sale prole~ts: ~ Other Cap 2p06 G.O. B I. ursed from e reimb ~ ~I~ * Funds to b $95,000 I gtre n g ~Zp0,~00 of seN~~s pra e ~ program i~ plaMin9 and I ~u~y ~ g 2005 p0412~05 Year-to-Date FY 2 and Program of Services plann~n9 for FY 205106 Revised FY 2pp412~05 Budget planning and Y 2005106 SeN~~es for F to . o vs . v~s~ 5 ~ 0 un I nera - ce ~ Drff eren FY 205 FY 205 al Fund Revised ~ener Adopted 65,549} 5 7 43 ~5 92 31,51 32,Q82~2 1 Q44,734 es 1 3g1,gg4 , ReVenu 347,25Q riatian of 5 Apprap 478,1$ alanoe 2 g07 X727 Fund B 2g,542 3 , 32,4 Resauroes 45,731 Total 45p,297 3 556 32 ~ 34 32,4Q 4 3g4,7 d~tures 384,73 Expen 441,455 bravoes 2 845,p31 Enoum Q3 ! 565 3 , • nts 32,4 g5 i oomm~tme 62,6 ~o Tota 25,875 Veil Under} vin and Program of Services Plan 9 July 5, 2005 i i - ~S Adopted i-- ~~5 Revised FY 2 eras F and i Gen acts to Revenues Tax revenue ~ imp decrease in Sales ~ _ ($360,000) ection fee I _ 51,000) decrease in fru b & drainage ~nsp I, _ 61,000) decrease ?n c 3 000) decrease in recreation fees ~~g e ~n appropriation of fund balance I increas ~ _ $650,000 a~ settlement due to 1eg erases ency impacts too d crease as result of conting I _ ($420:0 ~ planrnng et e ds ~fflCe ~ _ ($185,000) add by City Ma ag 11 I recommends a? settlement _ $650,000 ~n~rease for leg of SeN~~es I Planning and Program ~ Jury 5, 2005 I preliminary Tax Roll Program of SeNices planning foaFY 2005106 _ _ - " - TaX R° ~na~ ~ prelim ~I ' trict released prelim?na~ ~I .Tarrant AP'Praisal Des a I roll in y pssumpt~ons ated o Toss I _ Certified roll 3°/ estim I _ $84 M neW construction ~i _ gg~/a collection rate rate) e aS FY 2005 li _ 57¢ tax rat o SP operty Taxes Distribution e1nvestment Zones _ 37% for debt service t R General Fund) ~ _ 4% for Tax Increm 13 ,raintenan~e ~ 59% for operations & of SeN~~s piannin9 and Program July 5, 2~5 I Tax Roil Preliminary Tax Roll $3,344,601,724 preliminary x$100,380,052) Less: 3% historical loss $3 244,263,668 Estimated Tax Roll 5~¢ Tax Rate per $100 value 49Z 303 Tax Levy at 100% collection 84 923) Less'. 1% uncollectible 7,462,315) Less: Debt ServicelTlRZ transfers $10 $45,064 Estimated General Fund Tax Revenues Planning a"d Pfp1j Services Jury 5, 3005 - - I ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ Rod - ,,minary Tax p yell ues go? o roperty tax revers $45064 HoW far d p X10, d General Fund Tax 5 g48) I Estimate ~~g,~ 4 , I Revenues S CFY 2006 prelim) ,699,2 6 erat~ b'e for other police ~P avails 08,369,9951 I galan~e 779 operations S FY 2006 prelim) 06,670 Fire ~Peration ~ for other Bailable ~5 I, galan~e a I operations program of Services I Planning and I ~u~y y, 2005 aX R •nary T prelim ~I ate ca~~ulation to produce Effective tax _ taX rate neCessa aS prior year ~ ~ _ pefinitior pe~y tax re~enueS rior year from p I same P in ~a~ues ~tion increase ~onstru -Includes _ Apes not include new tion of ta~ate ~ ublic hearing ea if p tax I ub~rop~sed ~ P requ?r rate in~reasehan effective tax es less than I, greater t in PrOpe~'y va~u e - 57~ rat 16 .In~reaSes ~ ated e{~ective taX planning and Pro9~am of SeM~s Estim I~~ July 5, 2005 prelim?na~ FY 2~p51 B~dget program of Services planning fodFY 2p05106 Y _ f- to _ ~ v~ ¦ I~m re 0 un I era en p~~erence FY 2~~8 FY Zpp5 nd prel?m enera~ F u o ted o3 , ~ 45 G Ad p 37 '1 32, ~ 85,4 482292 408 , 550 32 ~ 3 8Q0 ues o 7 5 , Reven 347 ,25 riation of og,695 Approp 37 5 ance 32,939'2 Fund Bat 429 , 842 s 32' 7 2 ,7 6 ~ Resource 27 2,4 Total 34,876,3 403 4 586 32 ~ 90 • res 937 ) EX end?tu 5 976 , ~ 2, rl lJ nder) Ove ~ .n and program of Services plann? g July 5, 2Q05 ~~5 pdopte - relim ~S • 2 _ FY 2p06 P rah Fund Gene ~ o Revenues o e~y Tax revenue 1, Impacts t crease ~n Pr p reveuna for - ~5g0,~pp in Sales Tax balance ' decrease ~n ropriation ofi f - (~480,~~~~ of app - ~65~,ppp increase Iega1 settleEXpenses Settlement I arts to ~n 1egal Im ~650,~00 increase ~nterna? Services I _X150 ppp increase in health costs balance of third am - 12, 00~ full Year Staffe g e to rebuild Insurance I _X245, tanned eXp 19 - $103800 p I ReSeNes S p~annin9 and Pro9~am ~f $ervice i ~u~y g, 2005 I ¦ ¦ re ~minar u e Public Safety Other 51 7% PW/Plan/Insp/ED 12% t r, ~ ~ ~ Communications 1% General Govt 12% C u Itu re/Leisure Budget/Finance 12% 3% Capital Imp Reserve 2% July 5, 2005 Planning and Program of Services 20 Upcom~n9 issues and Program of Services planning for FY 2005106 ter'a~s ~brary Nla Growth ~n o Sa. ft~ 'I now - apPX~ 3~'meS ,n libra?~l S only Libra~l 17~,D~p volu et ~onstra?nt 'I Currently of facilitylbudg es I, .Current oWth to ~ volum allow gr # of volumes to grow I. Issues With room _ New IibraN Start 9 at ~apa~ity Se number of _ New libra~l ~ F and to ~n~rea erring of Bork library °P Crean es ~n time for new ~ volum F financing fundraising eff°~S _ Common the L'bra~ it z2 f Program of SeNices _ Friends o I Planning and ~ Juty 5,2005 Growth in Library Materials • Do we increase the size of the collection? • What is a reasonable goal? • Would the Council favor creating a reserve to meet this goal? • Do we work with Library Board, Friends of the Library or other groups to raise this money? July 5, 2005 Planning and Program of Services 23 ~ econstruction of Greens R at Iron Horse Iron Horse opened in 1992 • Since 1992, new area courses have ~i created competitive market • Staff has been planning for reconstruction li ~ of greens • 100,000 for greens reconstruction and ~ miscellaneous maintenance identified I ~ ~ Proposed financing with 4B tax funds I 24 July 5, 2005 Planning and Program of Services Recona rlrotn Horse r • Projects require closure from JuIY 1, 2006 to September 15, 2006 . Projected Financial ~mP$596,398 Loss of revenue enses $144,945 -Reduction of exp $451 453 -Net loss of revenue zs Planning and F~o9~am of Servkes Jury 5.2W5 traction of Green Re~~ns at Iron H°rse q.g Sales tax cil supp~~~Ve of usin9on? II • Is Coon for greens reconstruc 4B Sa1eS tax to pay ortive of using Is Council supp a for lost reVenUe~ ~I to p y of parks proleCts an rioritizat~on ~ . ~s re-P option? I 26 Planning and Program of Services I ~u~y 5, 2005 _ - G~ for _ - - tract W ith EA s Prop°Sed on ement Se~~c Course Manag er'nent Golf rnanag off course ited hires 9 Golf Lim 'I 1992 -City IlianCe now Evergreen A ex Tres 1212005 firm, ear contract P . Current five-y eWing With EAGL ~f ren reens reconstruction Benefits during J II _ Expertise needed ,~nitment ~i of com construction -Long track record or new contractor duri W tch _ Difficult f s ' er course under EAG~ 27 _ premi I Planning and Program of SeN~~s ~u~y 5, 2005 Proposed Contract with EAGL for Golf Course Management Services • Potential terms of new contract -New profit sharing partnership approach - Renewal contingent on greens reconstruction project - Proposing a three-year contract, coinciding with our fiscal year i July 5, 2005 Planning and Program of Services 2$ Proposed Contract with EAGL for Golf Course Management Services • Is Council supportive of considering a new contract with EAGL? • If so, can staff begin negotiations? • Are there particular terms Council would be interested in including? ~ July 5, 2005 Planning and Program of Services 29 _ ns for N~~h~s°u• ppt~o Center F acilit1eS I, tion ~ Recrea tions for initiating b'e -Discuss op oss y ~ ~ Pure°Se ationa~ facilities anon making study of re ~~e proCeSS for deCis eXped~t?ng reement KnOWns sated in Home Town po sq ft. ~ _ F acility to ~ 100 ,00 M, S~Ze' a uatics -Budget: $2~ .9 Brous services includingle ed 2010 I. - Num Starts 208, comp ~ _ Schedule: I 30 Planning and Program of SeN~~s I~ July 5, 2005 th tions for N°~h~ ~u Op n Center Facilities Recreatio unknowns nl or with Richland Hills - Southside: NRH o y build new or renovate Food Lion _ Southside~ ur oSe of facility - Southside: size and p p tWO facilities erating _ Costslrevenues of ~ hire recreational .Recommendation re are a feasibi?ity facil?tY Planner onS and costs study of all opts ~ 000 in FY 2006 from 4B . Budget -X50' Sales Tax Fund 31 planning and Program of Serves duly 5, 2005 . _J ~ _ - ~I _ _ r No~h~sout pptions fO r F a~ilities e~reat~on Cen e R e of studying . oth ort~vo poiunities ~n b • Is Council a~ fap ility P RHO recreation areas ~f N en~n9 ~I, north and SOUth u timeline fo?gyp ove p .Should ~n!e s~ ~f So, how much neW facil?tie ~i ~i s2 ~i of SeN~~s I planning and Pro9~am ~I~ July 5, 2005 oration rah Gas EXp ~ Natu ar e natura~ olds 1 9 formation h .Barnett Shads st ef~eCtive as reserve for CO g allows ,Recent technology extraction inimally invasive in NRH and m interested in drilling ,Gas compan1es cities ~ rring in surrounding Emits but . prill?ng is oc~u ,n city I aW allows for drilling I of local ordinanCeS o 'State for adoption issues provides & safety ealth 33 fu~her regulate h planning and Program of Services ~I fury 5, 2pp5 . - - - - as EXp~oration Natural G S a or eS han g re u~ation issu cin g ~ M J sage of ordinance en e~y for dr~~~~ng ~ ~I, _Peasing of City-owned pro Ce re ulation ordinan pr~~~~ng g rotection _ vantageS~ assure reside~r'p~ng Ad eS; may inhib? _ pisadvantag owned property source .Leasing of C~ty- es: neW revenue _ Advantag ercept~on ~ es: public p 34 I - Disadvantag planning and Program of SeN~~es I July 5, 2005 ~I- S Exploration I Natura? Ga ortive of staff • Would council be suspo ensure residents preparing ordinance ~i, protection? rdinances be pad of • And would these o ~ ances or zoning ordinances? ~i~ code of ord?n investigating the leasing I • Should staff begfor drilling? i of City property 35 II Planning and Program of Services II ~u~y 5, 2005 _ ¦ n ur s~ u rogranns urced ~ nt outs° • curre ion e collect Lion - Garbag and collet lance brll?ng . - Ambu ection Tax toll e - P ropey aintenanc • Street M wing - Pre~ent?ve t_of-way mo ace~r~gh _ ark open sp . • utirity bills P a~l~ng of tang and m erv?ce - Pr~n . • ca?lect~an s ~ kbox ut?lity - hoc e,ment sand rse manag resource _ olf cou se of G ~c1ent u ~ ns re off nct~o for m° core fu . Allows trace °n to concen 36 ability and program of Services punning duly 5, 2005 Outsourcing • What areas is Council willing to explore? • What cost-saving threshold would be reasonable for considering outsourcing? July 5, 2005 Planning and Program of Services 37 updates Program of Services planning foaFY 2005106 rnal Service Plans Inte - ar 10 yrs.) Internal Service plans .Multi ye nnually updated a eration, • Plans include costs ~fital replacement maintenance and cap ed for these .City depa~ments are charg costs ro ert tax ~n es when • Plans assume no p ou_ o resew and use of pay-as y g possible 39 ~I ram of Services ~ Planning and Pro9 July 5.2005 ~ ternal Se~~Ce P ans ~ in lacement & Maintenance ~ ,Equipment Rep Fire ~ _ lacement and maintenancean~ eau,pment ~~i and Suppo~ Se~1Ces vehi~Y 2005 ear plan as of i _ $32 M ten-Y i ~ - No debt issued since 1 g9 cash flow analysis indicates debt _ Preliminary e ui ment: 'I issuance needed for folloT u 9 a p . $801,000 -Aerial Ladder I . $205,000 -Ambulance 1 000 -Dump Trucks (2), Backhoe and Roller ~ • $31 ao ~ and Program of Services planning ~I ~u~y 5, 2005 pans ervice Internal S & Maintenance Plan p erating fac~~ities .Building P of City _ keep and ?~aintenanCe FY 2005 ~p Ian as of - X22 M ten-year p 1998 _ No debt issued since SAS ~nd~~ates debt analy cash flow -Preliminary ~ issuance not needed ear Plans I, ether' ?~ulti-y re ~a~ement plan eserve p erating & _ Insurance R unications Op uter & Telecom?~ -Comp Iacement Plan 41 Equip?~ent Rep '~i Punning and Program of Services i ~i ~U~y 5, 2005 i i~ - - ~ •t Rate Study Utili y changed rates ~ g94 -Last rate study roved new rate study I~ • 2004 -Council app ster Plan and ~ Stud delayed until Utility m a ete was co p ~ ~rnpact Fee Study a roved Utility Master . April 2005 - Counc PP ~ Plan and Impact Fee Study used rates to and prop • July 25 -Rate stuncil be briefed to Cou g & 3p _ Proposed rates Rude et • 2 osed 9 July 42 included in FY 2006 Prof planning and Program of Services ~I ~u~y 5, 2005 - _ _ Study tility Rate v includes: .Rate study Services _ Cost of water ~ er ser~?ices _ Cost of sew . Cost cons?dera~ ~a ntenance Se~~Ces ~ _ pperations an River Authority 'I Worth & Trinity based on CIP plan) - F°~ rovements ~I -System ~mP considerations I .Rate access ~harge~ _ Base rate ~ actua? use) FW & TRA) ~ _ Volume rate ( increases from 43 of Services I~ _ pass throughla a 9en~Program I' Jury 5.2005 I - - - Utility Rate Study • Effect on Customer Bills -Compare proposed rates to existing rates - Compare proposed rates to surrounding cities -Phase in increases to minimize effect -Implement any rate increase in fall/winter July 5, 2005 Planning and Program of Services 44 ~ - - - - Long Range Utilities CIP ~ Duration of plan -fifteen years through FY 2019-2020 Identifies future improvements required to support new development for 10 years • Identifies upgrades & replacements required to keep system operational for 15 years July 5, 2005 Planning and Program of Services 45 ange Utilities bong R eXt 15 years cost over n ~g3,40~ ,667 gp projects to ~n~rude _ 22 miles of Ovate ' station expansions i _ 3 water pump allon storage tank I, ~ _ NeW 5 million 9 er lines _ 13 miles of sew ansion Mayor ~~{t station exp 'I Financ?ng Impact fees _X17 ~ gg,560 - Sealer revenues I. - ~46~233,500 -Water and 46 ~ of SeN~~s Planning and Program ~ 2005 ~I~ July 5, Long Range Utilities CIP System Assessments Facilities & $270,000 Equipment $14,117, 732 Water Lines $30, 799, 250 Sewer Lines $18, 214, 685 July 5, 2005 Planning and Program of Services 47 Animal Shelter Expansion elter opens, 4,450 sq• ft. Animal Sh 47 Sq. ft. to • 1987 - ands to 6,~ 1992 _ Shelter ~atiauga contract ansion accommodate 000 sq. ft• exp proposed 11, . 2003 - shelter at cost of ~3 M a to buy?d °Wn . 2005 - W ataug to 8,00 Sa~ ft' • Expansion seduced renovation of . Current Cost estimates for QB existing approach $3 M Planning an0 P~o9ram of Services JuIY 5.2005 - Animal Shelter Expansion j .Financing ~i - $1.3 M General Obligation Bonds - $535,914 Reserves (donations & events) ~~i - $1.0 M Fundraising efforts ~ • Next Steps ~ -Seek Council approval of fundraising professional services contract in Aug ear -Focus on fundraising efforts for one y -Develop scope and scale of expansion based ~ on available funds 49 planning and Program of Services July 5, 2005 as er an 2 ~~5 y ~ July 5, 2005 Planning and Program of Services 50 r _ - ent zones ~i nt ReinVeStm TaX Increme ~i h TIF reports apprOVed I~ .June 2~ - bot b X5.6 M ~'I T~F values increased 1Y~ M - Read prOpe~y increased ~ 'i _ Business personal; _ Aver 600 neW 1°b IS v~~~age Center 33% occup?ed _ Nosh Richland Hil ~ TIF #2 100 M e~y values increas {axe .1 M in 2005) _ Real prop 31 M in property ~ ~ _ Collected $ ~ _ Library pr~lect underway I 51 II Planning and Program of SeN~~s ~u~y y, 2005 Com arisons and p~Ogramming of planning for FY 2005106 Servl~es NlorkshoP i_-_= ca1endar Budget oil rece?ved from R ~i 22 _ Certified Ta ra~sal District i ~u~y Tarrant ApP ed Budget distributed to July 22 - Counc I _ Budget W orksession duly 29-30 ublic hearing ust $ _ possible p Baring Aug ublic h Ibud9et August 22 - Possibl1e public hearing e tember ~ 2 P do on t S P a p to adop _ Last Council meeting September 26 budget 53 I~ program of Services I P~annin9 and ~ ~ July 5, 2005 "9 ~u'y b } j> Syr v f . ~ ~ ..t. i' ~ ~ ' 3~ i ~ ~ , R r O ~ T ~ •F O w? { s,~ ~ u 5 iyMt ~ ~ s ~ 3 r ~ ~ 'K ~ ln, ~ ~ t ~ e k ~ w t ~ ~r , ~ ~ . ~ ~ i. v ~ ' 4 :ri ` a 7? t{~ j • ar 3t 1. ~ ~ i A ` ~ ~ <4 1~ ~ q ~ y jt 7 , i i~ . x ~ • i { '4~, ~ ' ~ iii{~ ~q I ~ ~ ~ n i~ 't ~ } t ~ ~ !j d ~ ~ = , 0 ` ~ E t r ~ ` , 4w.- ~ ! ~ , i ~ ~ a x ; ~ ~ ~~s.~ s j~' ~ ~ r 3 e ~ x ~ ,a ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1. E e ~ / ` t: ~ f ~f. r. J i~ 5~. ~ } . 'Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ,u E^ NRH2O HISTORY •Construction Cost - $7•$ million •Park Opened -June 1, 1995 •Attendance 15i Year - 185,375 •Revenue 151 Year - $1.8 million I •2004 Attendance - 213,285 •2004 Revenue - $2.$ million •2005 Attendance Projections - 226,326 •2005 Estimated Revenues - $3.2 million ATTRACTIONS & IMPROVEMENTS Attractions Improvements •Double Dipper •Guest Services Kiosk •Green Extreme •Professor's Party Pad •Purplepaloozza •Frogstein's Forest •Wave Pool Shade •Splashatory Seating Area i •Concession Seating Area Master plan 05 Strategic ~~a~ 2~ finan at Will re are a market and of Plan - P p strategy th .Goad ark the water park for the valuation includin9a~io of help guide the oPe s. neXt five season of the Phan nts feasibility study .Comp°ne of the lacement of facilities .Final version .Master plan shOW~ng p rites mended them~ng costslad?~~ssion p .Recom de~elop?~ent strate9~es .Estimated & existing fa~~~~ties and s'Ponsorship uses and trends .~Ilarketing of comp1ementa~ ation ,E~a~uation om~~ impact, industry inform .Eton ~I~ i~•;._~fi11~ ,`f1!f ~~f~-j l! ( ~ i.~ f.' ~ 1 1T 1 ~ "~...~F;...~. I <'il i~i i ii`. ~ , t it rt~ ~1 f~ ; _,~.~w.. - ~ ~ ~ , - 1 ~ , r ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~,.h.~ ~ ~T ;w ( ~ ~ ~ ~ £ Y ~ P-~ r ~ t r, l,~,"' ~ ~ ' ;>y rf4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fe/.,. ~R ~ #rr ~ ~ a . ~~r -~k S . I'. A ~C . T .y ~ ~ ~r r ~ . M1x1 _ ~ ~J~l x1 J J k~ M! f '4 ~1 ~ t' k x d s .~Y~} r- <<lIQ1.~ Y ~ ~ T ~ ~ 1 Sri - x ~ ~~~(Y VJAT[4 Pa~~ ~+~-.-^"(.!f `-T' / ~ ~ l.i j/J( ~ K9F:' -FkNCI ../j ~ C' ! 5 C:' ("I ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ar~~as~aa~~, inc. re Cap~ta~ Recommendations F utu 2006 Catering Building Group Pavilions Replacement of Train nmentlofrtrai ture Addition of road/real g 2007 Mat Rider Barrel Roll Canopy 2008 Addition of South Restrooms Additional South Picnic areas 2009 ~a9~on Super BoW~ Slide 2010 Boomerango NRHZ~ HISTORY ,Construction Cost - $7 $ m~~~ion .park Opened s+ ~eae 1185,375 .pttendanc15~Ye r _ $1 8 million .Revenue •2004 Attenda~~e " 2~3'2S5 •2004 Revenue - $2•$ mi111On projections - 226,326 ated Revenues - $3.2 m~~~~on •2005 E1s~ ~ ante .2005 ATTRACTIONS & IMPROVEMENTS Attractions Improvements •Double Dipper •Guest Services Kiosk •Green Extreme •Professor's Party Pad •Purplepaloozza •Frogstein's Forest •Wave Pool Shade •Splashatory Seating Area •Concession Seating Area e Master Phan 2 05 Stmt g ~a~ _ repare a market and financ strategy that W~?~ •Goal of Plan p a marketing ark for the evaluation ?n~~ud~ng ide the operation of the water p help 9u next five seasons. •Components of the Plan Study .Final version of W nfep~a 'ement of facilities .Master plan sho 9 ment costsladmission prices •Recomm~ deve~opm~ng •Estimate onsorship strateg?es facilities .Marketing and sp uses & existing .Evaluation of comp?ementary act, industry information and trends •Economi~ imp a. . a.. i . e> ~ ~ ~ , , - I ~ ~ _ (I ~ ~ I I i ~ ~ ..,..:~~4 ~ U~ ~I ~rti1 'i~it~[ij' it.i~` ~!'1,,~1 ~~llfl _ t~ - ~ s ~ - E _ ~ - _ ~ ~ ` _ o ~ s ~ y.' ~f _ ~ .4 tr, ~s r~x' ~ ` ~ fA r * ~ ~ r ~ ~ .gyp ,j'a w r L~ - ~ P v ~ ~ 1 / • ~ v~ ~ r ` ' r ~ _ F ~ G~ / ~'[t`x~fir~e.~F ~ ta-, ~ ~ ~~~t~ ~ . ~ € ~ ~ ` ~ .x r ~ `~F Nar~.y~Hom e~ommendations uture Capital R F Catering Bu~~d~ng 2006 Group Pa~~~1Ons Similar feature lacement of Train W~ Rep nment of trail pcldition of roadlrealig 2007 Mat Rider Barrel Ro11 Canopy outh Restrooms 2008 Addition of S Additional South Picnic areas 2009 ?-agoon Super Bowl Slide 2010 Boomerango