The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 2000-01-24 Agendas CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 24, 2000 - 6:00 PM For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall - Pre-Council Chambers 7301 Northeast Loop 820. I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I 1. Discuss Items from Regular January 24, 2000 City Council Meeting (5 Minutes) 2. IR 2000-09 Discuss Charter Communications Rate Increase (10 Minutes) 3. IR 2000-08 Discuss a Joint Meeting Date with Planning & Zoning on the Comprehensive Plan (5 Minutes) 4. IR 2000-10 Development and Inspection User Fees (30 Minutes) 15. I Adjournment - 6:50 pm I I . ~:-;:! :: ..._......_.l~.a:1Q..9_._-..__._------ f)::.te tl : /0 f') th.- .. "'A~_'_" ._."....._~__.a^._,__.... ,~~,_.:~~~._... ~__..~"'_.,,_T__.·".·.·.__·.~_~~<__~'_ ':.......¡'.. GP1J;;;~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 24, 2000 - 7:00 PM For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:00 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items on the consent agenda will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 427-6060 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation - North Ridge Middle School 3. Pledge of Allegiance North Ridge Middle School 4. Special Presentations 5. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 6. GN 2000-04 PU 2000-05 PW 2000-05 7. PZ 99-34 8. PZ 99-41 9. PZ 2000-01 10. PS 99-37 Consent Agenda Item(s) a. Minutes of the Pre-Council Meeting January 10, 2000 b. Minutes of the City Council Meeting January 10, 2000 c. Set Date for Public Hearing to Consider Extending Ordinance No. 1994 Juvenile Curfew Ordinance for Three Years d. Award Bid for Roof Replacement to Team Design in the Amount of $27,900 Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way for the Rufe Snow Drive Widening Project e. Consider the Site Plan Review of Lots 2R, 3 and 4, Block 1, Davis-North Tarrant Parkway Addition - Thornbridge Crossing and Zoned C1 - Commercial. This Property is Located at the Southeast Corner of North Tarrant Parkway and Davis Boulevard in the 8400 Block of Davis Boulevard Continuation of Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Carrera Consulting Engineers, Inc. for a Zoning Change on Tract 4P1, out of the AG. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1630 from R-7-MF-Multi Family to C-2-Commercial. (Located at 4004 Flory Street) - Ordinance No. 2447 Consider the Request of Joe Wade for Site Plan Approval of a Commercial Development on Property known as Lot 1, Block 1, Eaton Addition. This Property is Located at the SWC of Harmonson Road and Rufe Snow Drive Consider Request of Skyline Norstar USA L.P., for a Final Plat of Lot 2, Block 1, Silverado Addition. This property is Located at Harwood Road and is the Site for Phase II of Silverado Apartments as Approved under PD-25 City Council Agenda 1/24/00 Page 2 City Council Agenda 1/24/00 Page 3 11. GN 2000-05 Youth Advisory Committee Report on Status of Activities to Date 12. GN 2000-06 Approve and Adopt the 2000 North Richland Hills Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan 13. GN 2000-07 Approve Development and Inspection User Fees - Ordinance No. 2451 14. GN 2000-08 Appointment to Place 2 on the Teen Court Advisory Board 15. GN 2000-09 Reconsider Action on PZ 99-44 - Ordinance No. 2448, concerning request of Mary Jane and Edward Let for a Zoning Change for Tracts 2A3, 2AB3, 2A3, W. C. Newton Survey Abstract 1182, Addressed as 7591 and 7601 Precinct Line Road from AG-Agricultural to PD - Planned Development for a Wedding Chapel and other Associated Accessory Wedding Chapel Uses 16. PW 2000-06 Approve "No Parking Anytime" Zone on the West side of the 4400-4500 Block of Booth Calloway Road at Rodger Line Drive - Ordinance No. 2452 17. a) Citizens Presentation b) I nformation and Reports IR 00-011 1.) NRH20 Annual Report 18. Adjournment H)<:'l'ED I-;}./-oo "'----.....>._--' .. [);~le ,- .__.__;¿:LQ,~;::R-1V3::: .i '_',-,f';' 9?~m INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 00-009 ~ Date: T Subject: January 24, 2000 Charter Communications Rate Increase On December 13, 1999 Charter Communications notified the City of its intent to increase cable service rates effective February 1, 2000. The 1996 Cable Act gives local government the responsibility of regulating rates for the basic service tier and for equipment, provided the municipality is a local franchise authority certified by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the cable system is an area that is not subject to effective competition. The City of North Richland Hills is a certified local franchise authority because . Charter Communications is not subject to effective competition in this area according to the FCC's tests for establishing whether effective competition exists. This is the first rate increase implemented by the cable operator since January 1998. Basic cable service rates will increase from $10.70 to $11.01 monthly. The monthly charge for renting a remote control from Charter will increase from $0.18 to $0.37, and the monthly charge for the cable converters will increase from $1.19 to $2.23. A customer with basic cable service, a remote control and a converter box will see their bill increase from $12.07 to $13.61, a total monthly increase of $1.54 or 13%. I ',-- Local franchise authorities have one year from the time a rate increase is implemented to act on that rate increase; however, cities cannot take any action until the rate increase has taken effect. So, NRH has until February 1, 2001 to act on this rate increase. In order to exercise the City's right to regulate basic service rates, staff would like to join with surrounding cities served by Charter and look into the possibility of having these rates reviewed for fairness by Connie Cannady, an expert on cable rates with the C2 Consulting Firm. Joining with other cities in this effort will save the City money. If NRH were to ask Ms. Cannady to review our City's rate increase alone, the cost would be approximately $3,500. However, Ms. Cannady can offer a better price if the cities served by Charter join together for a review of the rates. Should the experts deem the rate increase unfair, Charter would refund the difference to its customers upon verification- by the FCC. If the rate increase is deemed by the experts to be fair, the City has done its due diligence to insure fair cable service rates for its citizens. However, if NRH does not conduct a review of the rate increase and surrounding cities do, NRH would not be entitled to the same recourse as other cities should the increase be deemed unfair. At this time staff is asking whether it is the desire of the Council to have the rate increase reviewed, or whether it is your desire to let the rate increase take affect as described above with no review. If it is the Council's desire to have the rates reviewed, would you like staff to join with surrounding cities served by Charter in reviewing the rates. R7;:~;¡:-- ''-.. Paulette Hartman Administrative Assistant to the City Manager ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 00-008 , '- ~ Date: January 24, 2000 . . T Subject: Discussion of Joint Meeting Date with Planning and Zoning on the Comprehensive Plan With the update of the comprehensive plan nearing ,a close, it is necessary that we schedule a joint meeting with Planning and Zoning and City Council. The majority of the fieldwork has been completed. The consultant is taking the information and putting it into maps as well as addressing issues as they relate to the update of the comprehensive plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission will meet with the consultant outlining some of the issues associated with updating the comprehensive plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission has suggested a joint work session with City Council to go over some of the findings as well as give Council a preview of where the update is headed. The consultant is looking for a meeting date the week of February 21. During the Pre Council meeting we would like to get your consensus on a meeting time with the Planning and Zoning Commission. We will need to allow two to three hours for the meeting. R~~ \...- Steve Norwood Assistant City Manager ,-. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS '-~ "- '\-. fI: INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 00-010' ~ January 24, 2000 T :::::CI: DEVELOPMENT & INSPECTION USER FEES - Ordinance No. 2451 The Building Inspections, Planning, and Public Works Departments have coordinated on revising their user fees and combining them into one ordinance. Each department has reviewed the DMG Maximus Study and discussed fee changes with the Finance Director and Assistant City Manager. In addition, fees of area cities were reviewed to examine comparisons. Discussion of the fee changes has been separated into three parts in this report. The fees are proposed to be effective March 6, 2000. Buildina Inspections As a result of the recent User Fee Study, increases in permit fees are proposed. The approach in the recommended increases is based on the percentage of the cost of recovery reported in the User Fee Study. Generally, fees reported with a cost of recovery less than 50% of costs are increased to 75% of the full cost. Fees reported with a cost of recovery between 50% and 75% are increased to 85% of the full cost. In some instances, new permit fees are established for the first time or the method used to compute the permit fees has been revised. Following is a brief summary of changes and points of interest (the bullets follow the ordinance structure): ~ Reinspection Fees - The current reinspection fee is set at $30.00. The change establishes increases fees for repeated "red tags;" $60.00 for the second reinspection and $100.00 for the third and subsequent reinspections. ~ Certificate of Occupancy - CofOs are separated in 3 dassifications with 2 of the 3 categories increased from $30 to $50. The other category remains unchanged. ~ Fences- A new category has been added for required subdivision walls and wrought iron fences. ~ Garage Sale - This category collects less than full cost but is left at current rate of $5 as a citizen service. ~ Grading/Excavation/Fill - Increased from $30 to $75, new categories added for "revised" grading plans not associated with plats. Currently the revisions are reviewed at no charge. ~ Changes to Approved Plans/Change of Contractor - New fees established for items previously performed at no charge (Table 2 of Ordinance, item #25 and #26). ~ Table of Valuation -,Current table used to determine fees adopted in '91 ('91 Uniform Building Code-UBC). Recommended table is from the '94 edition of the UBC. The lower end of the current table used to determine permit fees represented less than 50% recovery. If any part of the table is revised (increased) the entire table must be revised. ~ Commercial Parking Lots - New fee category added for adding surface parking. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS ~ Signs - Increased portable sign permit fee from $25 to $50, added $50 fee for banner "'- signs (current fee is no charge). The sign ordinance exempts fees for portable signs for non-profits. ~ Electrical Fees - Added new categories for electrical service changes over 200 amps. Increased fees for service changes under 200 amps, signs and construction trailers from $15 to $20. Currently there is a flat fee charged regardless of size of service. ~ Fire Related Fees .... Fire sprinklers and fire alarm systems now include a plan review fee. New fee categories for fire alarm systems established to replace a single flat fee of $60. New categories added for repairs to existing systems. Several other new categories added including standpipe systems, fire extinguishing system/fire suppression system and portable LP containers. Plannina '- The Planning Department has application fees for zoning, platting, variances to the zoning, signs and landscaping ordinances, county recording fees,street and easement vacations and street signs per intersection. According to the DMG Maximus Report, we collect from 20% to 30% of what it cost to process zoning applications. We collect 8.4% to 11 % on variance applications. We collect 8% to 15 % on plat applications. Initially, Staff considered increasing the applications fees to 50% of the cost, however in certain applications this was a dramatic increase. Staff then reviewed the North Central Texas Council of Government 1998 Fee Survey to see what were some of the surrounding cities application fees. '-- ~ Zoning Fees - Includes requests to rezone property from one district to another, specific use permits and planned development requests.' The current fee is $300, no matter what the size of the property or development. The 50% fee would be $450. This fee is similar to the fees of surrounding cities but does not take into account the size of the property. Staff proposes the $450 fee. ~ Site Plan Review -Includes review of non-residential projects within 200 feet of residentially zoned or land use planned property. The current fee is $225, no matter what the size of the property or the development. The 50% fee would be $550. The average survey fee of a one acre site plan review application excluding the City of Euless is about $300. Staff proposes a $400 fee. ~ Platting Fees -Includes request to preliminary, final, replat and amend plats. The current base fee is $120 plus $5 per acre or $1.50 per lot. The county recording fees and street signs per intersection are added for the total fee. The 50% fee would be $600. This fee would be a dramatic increase from the current NRH fee and the current fees charged by surrounding cities. Staff recommends increasing the base fee of the preliminary and final plats to $200 plus $3 per lot for residential plats and $5 per acre for non-residential plats. Staff recommends increasing the base fee of the replat to $250 plus $3 per lot. Staff recommends increasing the amended plat fee from $0 to $200. ~ Variance Fees - Requests to the Sign and Landscape Control Board are $175. Requests to the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) for residential property is $100 and non-residential property is $175. To use a 50% cost recovery for ZBA, Sign and Landscape Control Board would be extremely costly. Staff recommends only increasing ~ the ZBA applications for residential property to $150 and retain the other existing fees in this category. The remaining fees are simifar to the surrounding cities. Public Works The Public Works Department has three (3) General Fund user fees which it charges. 1. Street & Drainage Construction Inspection Fee 2. Street Sign Fee 3. Street Cut Repair Fee The "current rates" and the "percent cost recovery" are shown below. Current Rate % of Cost Recoverv 1. Street & Drainage Inspection Fee 2. Street Sign Fee 3. Street Cut Repair Fee 3% of Construction Cost $65/intersection $7.50/SF 62% 43% 37% - The Inspection Fee does cover the inspection costs, but does not cover any of the plan review costs incurred by the City concerning developer projects. In order to recover a portion of this cost, we are recommending the existing 3% Inspection Fee remain the same, but add an additional 2% Plans Review Fee. This will make the total Street & Drainage Inspection I Plan Review Fee 5% of the construction coSt. This total fee of 5% is equal to what Colleyville, Grapevine, and Southlake are currently charging and will allow us to collect 96% of our cost for inspections and plan review. '--- We are recommending at the same time the Utility Fund Water & Sewer Inspection Fee of 4% be dropped to 3% to coincide with the Street & Drainage Inspection Fee. We also recommend a 2% Plans Review Fee be applied uniformly, so the total fee for Water & Sewer Inspection I Plan Review will be 5%. This will also allow us to recover approximately 100% of our costs. In order to help recover more of our costs for the street signs and the street cut repair; we are recommending the following. Current Rate PropOsed Rate $100/intersection $10/SF Proposed % of Cost Recoverv ·Street Sign Fee ·Street Cut Repair Fee $65/intersection $7.50/SF 66% 49% ~ Staff would appreciate any comments the Mayor and City Council has. Respectfully submitted, ~ EiI' ryd I uiling Official ',,----- COMPARISON OF BUILDING PERMIT & PLAN REVIEW FEES North Richland Hills Haltom City Keller Bedford* Euless* Hurst Current Proposed Commercial '91 UBC '94 UBC '97 UBC '97 UBC '91UBC '91 UBC '91 UBC Valuation Valuation Valuation Valuation Valuation Valuation Valuation Plan 65% of 65% of 65% of 65% of None Building-No To 65% of Review Permit Fee Permit Fee Permit Fee Permit Fee Fire-Yes Permit Fee Residential '91 UBC '94 UBC '97 UBC '97 UBC '91 UBC Flat Fee '91 UBC Valuation Valuation Valuation Valuation Valuation Valuation Plan None None None 40% of None None None Review Permit Fee All cities use the value of construction for the basis in determining the building permit fee. The Uniform Building Code has a table that is used to determine the building permit fee based on the value of construction. Each newer edition ('91, '94, '97) of the code increases permit fees. *Bedford and Euless plan to update fees in the next 3 to 6 months. Hurst has been increasing fees each year. The Cities of South lake and Watauga use the '94 UBC to determine permit fees. EXAMPLE OF BUILDING PERMIT FEE FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE Following is an example of permit fees for a single family house with a construction valuation of $175,000. NRH CURRENT NRH PROPOSED OTHER '91 UBC '94 UBC '97 UBC PERMIT FEE $902.00 $1,270.00 $1,413.75 COMP ARISION OF PLATTING & ZONING FEES Final Plat Charge Per NRH Proposed Charge Euless $275+ Haltom City $300/$120 +$1.50/acre Bedford $100 +25/lot Watauga $100 20 NRH $120 +$5/acre+$59/application Hurst $150 +25/acre Keller $200 +$20/loUacre $200+$3 per residential lot or $5 per non-residential acre Colleyville $250 +$5/acre Southlake $300 +$20/loUacre Preliminary Plat Haltom City see final plat Bedford $100 +$25/lot Watauga $100 per 10 NRH $120 +$5/acre application Colleyville $150 +$2/acre Hurst $150 +$20/acre Keller $200 +$10/lot,$20/acre $200+$3 per residential lot or $5 per non-residential acre Euless $275 +$3/ou or $5/acre Southlake $300 +$20/loUacre Replatting Haltom City see final plat Watauga $75 per5 Bedford $100 +$25/lot NRH $120 +$5/acre+$58/application Keller $200 $20/acre Colleyville $250 +$5/acre Hurst $250 +$25/acre $250 + $3 per lot Euless $275 +3/ou or $5/acre South lake $300 +$20/loUacre South lake $400 +$30/lot res $300 $30/acre non res Rezoning Application Bedford $150 +$75/acre over run Colleyville $250 o - 5 acres $500 6 - 25 acres $500 +$10/acre over 25 acres Euless $125 o - 0.5 acre $250 0,5 - 5 acres $500 5 - 25 acres $500 +$10/acre >25 acres Hurst $300 <10 acres $400 > 1 Oacres Watauga $200 South lake $200 +$10/acre Keller $200 +$20/acre NRH $300 Application $450 Haltom City $300 Hearing Special Use Application Colleyville Haltom City Bedford Watauga Southlake Keller NRH $70/$150 $150 $175 $200 $200 $300 Site Plan Application NRH Euless Watuaga Bedford Colleyville Southlake Keller Hurst $50 $150 $205 $250 $300 $300 $600 $700 same as rezoning hearing $75/acre over one +$1 a/acre +$1 a/acre Application $450 +$205/acre over one Review +$1 a/acre +$1 a/acre <10 acres >10 acres $400 Variance Application Bedford $25 Colleyville "$125 Review Euless $75 Residential $235 non-residential Haltom City $70/$150 haring Keller $100 Watauga $150 NRH $100 residential $150 $175 non-residential Southlake $200 Hurst $150 case Haltom City $150 hearing Watauga $150 NRH Street & Drainage Inspection and Construction Plan Review: Street & Drainage Construction Plan Inspection Fee Review Fee City (% of Construction Costs) (% of Construction Costs) Total Colleyville 5% 0% 5% Grapevine 3% 2% 5% NRH (proposed) 3% 2% 5% Southlake 3% 2% 5% Haltom City 4% 0% 4% Hurst 4% 0% 4% Keller 4% 0% 4% Euless 3% 0% 3% NRH (current) 3% 0% 3% Watauqa 3% 0% 3% Bedford 2% 0% 2% Fort Worth 2% 0% 2% Denton 0% 0% 0% ORDINANCE NO. 2451 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR A DEVELOPMENT FEE STRUCTURE; PROVIDING FOR BUILDING PERMIT FEES; PROVIDING FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES; PROVIDING FOR MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES; PROVIDING FOR PLUMBING PERMIT FEES; PROVIDING FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT RELATED PERMIT FEES; PROVIDING FOR PLATTING AND ZONING FEES; PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT FEES; AMENDING ORDINANCES #1813, #1927, #2026, #1781, #1658 AND #381 BY DELETING EXISTING FEES AND/OR FEE TABLES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED ($200.00) DOLLARS FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Development fees required For each permit and or application required by the development codes of the City of North Richland Hills involving the platting, zoning, construction of public infrastructure and/or the construction of private improvements, the applicant shall pay any and all application fees, permit fees, investigation fees, inspection fees and plan review fees as indicated in the fee schedules in Table 1 through Table 7. Building Permit Fees: 1. All classes of construction (new, addition, remodel, alteration, etc.) shall pay a building permit fee that is assessed based on the valuation of the project. The fee shall be based on "Table 1 - Building Permit Fees." The building valuation may be established using the most recent "Building Valuation Data" as published in the Building Standards Magazine as published by the I nternational Conference of Building Officials or may be established as submitted by the permit applicant. The valuation of construction shall include the fair market value of the work described on the application and shall include architectural, structural, electrical, plumbing and mechanical work. Except as specifically referenced in "Table 2 - Miscellaneous Permit Fees," the building permit fee shall be based on valuation. 2. All associated trade permits shall be assessed based on the associated fee table. 3. All commercial and multi-family building permits on which the permit fee is based on valuation shall be assessed a plan review fee. The plan review fee shall be sixty-five (65) percent of the building permit fee unless otherwise specifically stated. 4. Permit fees for work commenced without a permit may be doubled. 5. Reinspection fees may be assessed for inspections requested when work is not ready, Ordinance No. 2451 Page 1 of 14 when the work is not accessible for inspection, when previously identified code violations are not corrected, when repeated violations are made by the same contractor on repeated jobs and/or as may deemed appropriate by the building official. The first reinspection fee shall be assessed at $30.00. The second reinspection fee for items not corrected from the first reinspection fee shall be assessed at $60.00. the third and each subsequent reinspection fee for items not corrected from previous reinspection fees shall be assessed at $100.00. TABLE 1 - BUILDING PERMIT FEES Total Valuation Fee $1.00 to $500.00 $22.00 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $22.00 for the first $500.00 plus $2.75 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $63.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $12.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $352.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus $9.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $580.00 for the first $50,000.00 plus $6.25 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $895.00 for the first $100,000.00 plus $5.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $2,855.00 for the first $500,000.00 plus $4.25 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $4,955.00 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.75 for each additional $1,000,000.00, or fraction thereof Ordinance No. 2451 Page 2 of 14 TABLE 2, MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING PERMIT FEES Item 1. Certificate of Occupancy Application Fee a. Change of Business Owner/Business Name b. Change of Occupant/New Tenant c. New Building, Addition, Tenant Finish Out 2. Residential temporary accessory building (less than 200 sq. ft) 3. Residential permanent accessory building 4. Fences (wood, chain link, vinyl (per lot or tract) 5. Fences (masonry-per lot or tract) 6. Fences (wrought iron-per lot or tract) 7. Fences (masonry screening wall) 8. Fences (subdivision walls) 9. Swimming pool, in ground 10. Swimming pool, above ground 11. Portable (self-contained) spa/hot tub 12. Retaining walls (more than 4 feet in height) 13. Satellite dish (more than 36 inches in diameter) 14. Carports 15. Deck/patio, without cover 16. Deck/patio, with cover 17. Demolition (per building) 18. Tent (30 day permit) 19. Carnival (approved by City Council) 20. Residential garage sale 21. Temporary construction/sales trailer 22. Grading, Excavation and Fill 23. Revised Grading Plan (per platted SF lot) 24. Revised Grading Plan (per acre or tract)1 25. Change To Approved Plans (minimum of one hour) 26. Change Contractor of Record 1For plans not submitted with plat application. Paving/Concrete (for projects not included with a building permit) 1. 2. 3. 4. Drive approach, new or replacement (ROW-per approach) Driveway, new or replacement (residential-private property) Sidewalk, new or replacement (within ROW) Commercial parking lot (adding surface area or change in grading patterns) Ordinance No, 2451 Page 3 of 14 Fee $ 30.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 15.00 valuation $ 15.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 valuation valuation $175.00 $100.00 $ 50.00 $ 30.00 $ 15.00 valuation $ 15.00 valuation $ 75.00 $ 30.00 $200.00 $ 5.00 $ 50.00 $ 75.00 $100.00 $250.00 $ 50.00/hour $ 25.00 $25.00 $15.00 $25.00 valuation Signs Permit Fees 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Permanent, 1 to 50 square feet in area Permanent, 51 to 100 square feet in area Permanent, 101 to 200 square feet in area Permanent, 201 to 300 square feet in area Permanent, 301 square feet and over (per square foot) Portable sign Banner sign Weekend advertising registration (per year) $50.00 $100.00 $200.00 $300.00 $1.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 Miscellaneous Fees 1. Contractor's Registration 2, Board of Appeals Filing Fee 3. Master Electrician's License (Annual Fee) 4. Master Sign Electrician's License (Annual Fee) 5. Journeyman Electrician's License (Annual Fee) 6, Journeyman Sign Electrician's License (Annual Fee) 7. Residential Wireman Electrician's License (Annual Fee) 8. Maintenance Electrician's License (Annual Fee) 9. Reciprocal Letter $ 75.00 $100.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 15.00 $ 15.00 $ 15.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 TABLE 3 - MECHANICAL FEES MONETARY VALUE OF PROPOSED WORK BASE + MULTIPLIER OF MONETARY VALUE $ 30.00 35.00 40.00 00.00 + .009 100.00 + .008 200.00 + .006 700.00 + .004 $ 0.00- 1,501 - 3,001 - 5,001 - 50,001- 100,001 - 500,001 - 1,500 3,000 5,000 50,000 100,000 500,000 or more TABLE 4 - PLUMBING FEES 1. New ResidentiallMulti-family/Hotels/Motels - Single family and multi-family residents, hotels and motels shall be calculated as follows: $50.00 for the first water closet, plus $25.00 dollars for each additional water closet Ordinance No, 2451 Page 4 of 14 2. Residential/Multi-family/Hotels/Motels Remodel/Repair - Single family and multi- family residents, hotels and motels shall be calculated as follows: $30.00 for each bath or kitchen area per dwelling unit 3. New Eating Establishments - Restaurants, cafeterias, deli's, and similar type establishments shall be calculated according to the following fee schedule: Total Gross Square Footage of Building or Lease Space 5,000 square foot or less 5,001 square foot or more Permit Ee.e .07 / sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet .06/ sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet 4. Remodel Eating Establishments - Restaurants, cafeterias, deli's, and similar type food establishments shall be calculated according to the following fee schedule: Total Gross Square Footage of Building or Lease Space 5,000 square foot or less 5,001 square foot or more Permit Ee.e .05/ sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet .04/ sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet 5. Commercial Structures - New, addition, remodel, repair or tenant finish out an existing retail, commercial or industrial structure shall be calculated according to the following fee schedule: Total Gross Square Footage of Building or Lease Space 5,000 square foot or less 5,001 - 25,000 square foot 25,001 - 50,000 square foot 50,001 square foot or more Permit &e $.025 / sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet $.015 / sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet $.0055/ sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet $.0035/ sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet 6. Miscellaneous Plumbing - Miscellaneous plumbing items shall be calculated according to the following schedule plus a $20.00 permit issuance fee shall be added to each miscellaneous permit: DESCRIPTION OF WORK Each plumbing fixture Each building sewer service Each septic system Each private storm sewer system Each hot water heater Each swimming pool P-trap Each construction trailer or mobile home service (water & sewer) PERMIT FEE $ 7.00 $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $15.00 Ordinance No, 2451 Page 5 of 14 Each propane tank installation Each water line Each temporary holding tank Each gas piping system one to five outlets Each gas piping system over five outlets, per outlet Repair or replacement of water piping or treating equipment, each fixture Repair or replacement of drainage, vent or sewer piping, each fixture Each water meter $10.00 $ 7.00 $10.00 $10.00 $ 1.50 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 The following must be issued on separate permits: Each industrial waste interceptor (grease trap/sand trap) Each backflow prevention device $20.00 $10.00 TABLE 5 - ELECTRICAL FEES 1. New and additions to single family and multi family residential units: $15.00 base fee plus $.04 per square feet (air conditioned area) 2. Residential remodeling or repair where the benefit area can be determined: DESCRIPTION OF WORK/AREA PERMIT FEE 500 SF or less 501 - 5,000 SF 5001 SF or more $ 35.00 25.00 + .04 per sq. ft. 200.00 + .009 per sq. ft. 3. New, addition, remodeling, repairing, or tenant finish out of a retail, commercial or industrial structure: DESCRIPTION OF WORK/AREA PERMIT FEE 500 SF or less 501 - 5,000 SF 5001 - 100,000 SF 100,001 - 500,000 SF 500,001 SF or more $ 35.00 25.00 + .04 per sq. ft. 200.00 + .009 per sq. ft. 425.00 + .007 per sq. ft. 1,500.00 + .005 per sq. ft. Ordinance No, 2451 Page 6 of 14 4. New, addition, remodeling, repairing or shell warehouse or shell structure: DESCRIPTION OF WORK/AREA PERMIT FEE 5,000 SF or less 5,001 to 10,000 S F 10,001 to 20,000 SF 20,001 S.F. and over $ 50.00 + 0.008 S.F. 60.00 + 0.006 S.F. 80.00 + 0.004 S.F. 110.00 + 0.003 S.F. 5. Electrical work that does not have a definable square foot area or is not covered as a miscellaneous electrical item: DESCRIPTION OF WORK/AREA PERMIT FEE Replace, Add or move an outlet or receptacle (each) Replace, Add or move a branch circuit (each) (Minimum permit fee $12.50) 6. Miscellaneous electrical items: DESCRIPTION OF WORK Accessory Building Temporary Power Pole Mobile Home Connection Signs Construction Trailer 30 Day Temporary Service 90 Day Temporary Service Swimming Pool/Hot Tub Service Change (up to and including 200 amps) Service Change (over 200 and including 400 amps) Service Change (over 400 and including 800 amps) Service Change (over 800 amps and including 1000 amps) Service Change (over 1000 amps) Ordinance No, 2451 Page 7 of 14 $ 3.50 3.00 PERMIT FEE $ 12.50 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 15.00 30.00 20.00 15.00 30.00 50.00 75.00 100.00 TABLE 6- FIRE SPRINKLER, FIRE ALARM AND OTHER FIRE RELATED FEES 1. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems a. Underground (Vault & lateral) ea. b. New sprinkler systems c. Addition, Removal, Relocation 1 to 19 heads 20 to 59 heads 60 to 150 heads Over 150 heads $75.00 Valuation $30.00 $65.00 $125.00 $175.00 d. Fire pump, ea. $100.00 e. Plan Review Fee for new fire sprinkler systems is 35% of permit fee. 2. Fire Alarm Systems a. 1 to 10 devices $ 50.00 b. 11 to 25 devices $ 75.00 c. 26 to 100 devices $100.00 d. 101 to 200 devices $200.00 e. 201 and more devices $300.00 f. Plan review fee for all fire alarm systems is 35% of plan review fee 3. Standpipe Systems (per standpipe) 4. Authorized burn permits 5. Underground flammable/combustible liquid storage tanks 6. Above ground combustible liquid storage tanks 7. Abandonment/removal/testing of underground combustible/flammable liquid storage tanks (per tank) 8. Fire extinguishing/fire suppression system 9. Installation of any LP gas container, except portable containers, of less than 120 gallons water capacity where natural gas service is not available (per container) 10. Installation of a LP portable cylinder rack (twenty or less cylinders )(per store) 11. Blasting (14 day permit) 12. Pyrotechnic special effects display 13. Residential automatic fire sprinkler system $ 75.00 $200.00 $100.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 70.00 $ 35.00 $ 35.00 $200.00 $ 35.00 $ 50.00 Ordinance No, 2451 Page 8 of 14 TABLE 7 - PLATTING AND ZONING FEES Zoning Fees · Filing Fee for Rezoning Application · Filing Fee for Special Use Permit Application · Filing Fee for Planned Development Application · Filing Fee for Site Plan Review Application Platting Fees · Filing Fee for Preliminary & Final Plat Application Plus $3 per residential lot and $5 per non-residential acre · Filing Fee for Replat Application Plus $3 per lot residential and non-residential · Filing Fee for Amended Plat Application · Plat Recording Fee (24x36) Plus $3.50 for each additional mylar page Plus $2.00 for each paper page attached · Plat Recording Fee (18x24) Plus $3.50 for each additional mylar page Plus $2.00 for each paper page attached · Covenants - per page · Street vacation · Easement vacation · Street Signs - per intersection Varinance Fees · Filing Fee for Zoning Board of Adjustment Residential Property Non-Residential Property · Filing Fee for Sign Review Board · Filing Fee for Landscape Review Board Miscellaneous · Sale of Zoning Ordinance · Zoning Verification Letters · Sale of Zoning Map · Sale of Subdivision Regulations · Sale of Slue Line Copies Ordinance No, 2451 Page 9 of 14 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $400.00 $200.00 $250.00 $200.00 $ 58.00 $ 43.00 $ 5.00 $100.00 $ 50.00 $100.00 $150.00 $175.00 $500.00 $500.00 $ 15.00 $ 15.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 5.00 TABLE 8 - PUBLIC WORKS FEES 1. Inspection Fees a. Street and Drainage Construction b. Water and Wastewater Construction 3% of construction costs 3% of construction costs 2. Construction Plan Review Fees (Street, drainage, water, Wastewater, traffic and earthwork & grading) 2% of construction costs 3. Street Cut Repair Fees $10.00 per square foot SECTION 2. That Section 18. Permit Fees of Ordinance #1813 is deleted in its entirety. SECTION 3. That Section 19. Inspections of Ordinance #1813, paragraph #3 is deleted. SECTION 4. That Section 14. Appeal Process of Ordinance #1813, paragraph #4 is amended to read as follows: "The appellant shall be required to pay a non-refundable fee as established in Fee Ordinance per appeal at the time that the appeal application is submitted to the Building Offièial." SECTION 5. That Section 20. Contractor Registration of Ordinance #1813, paragraph #1 is amended to read as follows: "As a prerequisite to obtaining permits as required by this code, any person or firm operating under the provisions of this code within the City of North Richland Hills shall be registered as a contractor and pay an annual fee as established in Fee Ordinance which shall be valid for one year from the date of issuance." SECTION 6. That Section 9. Permit Fees of Ordinance #2198 is deleted in its entirety. SECTION 7. That Section 10. Contractor Registration of Ordinance #2198, paragraph #1 is amended to read as follows: "As a prerequisite to obtaining electrical permits, any person, firm or business operating under the provisions of this code within the city shall register as an electrical contractor and pay an annual fee as established in the Fee Ordinance which shall be valid Ordinance No, 2451 Page 10 of 14 for one (1) year from the date of issuance. The registration fee is not refundable in cases of revocation or surrender of a contractor registration." SECTION 8. That Section 16. Electrical License Fee Schedule of Ordinance #2198 is amended to read as follows: "Applicants for an electrical license shall pay an annual license fee according to the Fee Ordinance." SECTION 9. That Section 20. Amendments to the Uniform Administrative Code Provisions of the National Electric Code, 1996 Edition, Ordinance #2198, paragraph #3, is deleted. SECTION 10. That Section 11. Inspection is deleted in its entirety. SECTION 11. That Section 12. Contractor Registration of Ordinance #1927, paragraph #1 is amended as follows: "As a prerequisite to obtaining mechanical permits as required by this code, any person or firm operating under the provisions of this code within the City of North Richland Hills shall be registered as a Mechanical Contractor and pay an annual fee as established in the Fee Ordinance which shall be valid for one year from the date of issuance. SECTION 12. That Section 13. Amendments of Ordinance #1927 is amended by deleting paragraph #1, 2, 3,4, & 5 in its entirety. SECTION 13. That Section 14. Permit Fees of Ordinance #2026 is deleted in its entirety. SECTION 14. That Section 15. Inspections of Ordinance #2026 is deleted in its entirety. SECTION 15. That Section 16. Contractor Registration of Ordinance #2026, paragraph #3 is amended to read as follows: ''The plumbing contractor shall register and provide all information requested in writing on forms furnished by the Building Official. Each plumbing contractor shall employ at least one (1) master plumber. The master plumber shall provide proof of current State of Texas Plumbing license, a State of Texas Drivers License and shall pay an annual fee as established in the Fee Ordinance which shall be valid for one year from the date of issuance. Ordinance No, 2451 Page 11 of 14 SECTION 16. That Section 27. Controlled Burning of Ordinance #1814, paragraph #4 is amended to read as follows: "4. Pay permit fee as established in the Fee Ordinance." SECTION 17. That Section 6. Sign Permit Application, paragraph B, subparagraph 7 of Ordinance #2374 is amended to read as follows: "The applicant shall pay a deposit in the amount established in the Fee Ordinance when the permit is application filed. The deposit may be applied to the permit when the permit is secured. If the permit is not secured, the deposit shall be considered a plan review fee and is non-refundable." SECTION 18. That Section 15. Sign Review Board, paragraph F of Ordinance #2374 is amended to read as follows: "Every application for a variance shall be accompanied by a filing fee as established in the Fee Ordinance." SECTION 19. That Section 3. Landscape Review Board, paragraph F of Ordinance #2375 is amended to read as follows: "Every application for a variance shall be accompanied by a filing fee as established in the Fee Ordinance." SECTION 20. That Exhibit "C" to Ordinance #1658 is hereby deleted. SECTION 21. That Ordinance #381 is amended by deleting all references to inspection and plan review fees. SECTION 22. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this Ordinance or of the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 23. It shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance for any person, firm or corporation to attempt to build, develop or improve real property in the City without first obtaining and paying for all permits which are required by the development codes of this City. Ordinance No, 2451 Page 12 of 14 SECTION 24. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance or of the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction in the municipal court of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, shall be subject to a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Hundred ($200.00) Dollars for each offense, and each and every day said violation is continued shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 25. The Director of Finance shall review all Development Fees annually and may adjust fees by the increase in the DFW Consumer Price Index for the preceding twelve months as established by the Department of Commerce. SECTION 26. This ordinance shall take effect on March 6, 2000 as the law and charter in such cases provides. DULY PASSED by the City Council of North Richland Hills, Texas, on the 24th day of January 2000. APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST CITY SECRETARY Ordinance No, 2451 Page 13 of 14 APPROVED AS TO FORM: LL2/ 9ð' ~ ~~~ CITY ATTORNEY ~~ DEPA~NT HEAD i Ordinance No, 2451 Page 14 of 14 Present: Absent: MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE PRE-COUNCIL ROOM AT CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JANUARY 10, 2000 - 5:45 P.M. Charles Scoma JoAnn Johnson Lyle E. Welch Russell Mitchell Frank Metts, Jr. Don Phifer Matt Milano, Ph.D. Larry J. Cunningham Randy Shiflet Steve Norwood Greg Vick Patricia Hutson Alicia Richardson Rex McEntire Marcy Ratcliff Larry Koonce Thomas Powell Tom Shockley Andy Jones Paulette Hartman Kevin Miller Mike Curtis Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager Managing Director of Community Services City Secretary Assistant City Secretary Attorney Director of Planning Finance Director Support Services Director Police Chief Fire Chief Assistant to the City Manager Assistant Public Works Director Assistant Public Works Director 1. Oscar Trevino, Jr. Councilman ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT CALL TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order at 5:46 p.m. DISCUSS ITEMS No items were discussed. NAN FROM REGULAR JANUARY 10,1999 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 2000-02 REVIEW Ms. Hartman briefed the Council on the proposed GREG V. of PROPOSED cable transfer of Charter Communications' to A T& 1. CABLE TRANSFER Council input was requested on two issues: 1) TO AT&T whether Council desired to have Mr. Paul Allen or his designee appear before Council and explain the Pre-Council Minutes January 10, 1999 Page 2 ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT reasons for the transfer and 2) whether Council desires any additional requirements or amenities in addition to the transfer provisions of the previous agreement. Concerns expressed by the Council included: 1) whether any anticipated equipment changes were anticipated; 2) additional transfers be prohibited for at least three years and preferably five years because of the time and cost involved; 3) an assurance that the City's Citicable can not be eliminated; 4) the desire to address open access of Internet Service Providers to the high speed Internet services now provided over the cable lines. The Council also requested that a representative from both Charter Communications' and A T& T meet with the Council to address issues on the proposed transfer. The Cable TV Board is to be invited to attend the meeting with the Cable Representatives. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma announced at 5:54 p.m. that the NAN meeting would adjourn to Executive Session to consult with the Attorney on litigation matters (Davis et al v. City) and for deliberation regarding real property (Highway Expansion and Rufe Snow) as authorized by Section 551.071 and Section 551.072 of the Local Government Code. Charles Scoma - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JANUARY 10, 2000 -7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order January 10, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Charles Scoma JoAnn Johnson Lyle E. Welch Russell Mitchell Frank Metts, Jr. Don Phifer Matt Milano Absent: T. Oscar Trevino, Jr. Staff: Larry J. Cunningham Randy Shiflet Steve Norwood Greg Vick Patricia Hutson Alicia Richardson Rex McEntire Mayor Mayor Pro T em Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager Managing Director of Community Services City Secretary Assistant City Secretary Attorney 2. INVOCATION Mayor Scoma led the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Members from the Boy Scout Outpost 98 and 144 led the pledge. City Council Minutes January 10, 2000 Page 2 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None. 5. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA None. 6. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED A. MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 13,1999 B. MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 13,1999 C. AWARD BID FOR 2000 YEAR MODEL VEHICLES D. AWARD BID FOR BREATHING APPARATUS TO SAFECO, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,431.69 E. AWARD BID FOR FIRE HOSE TO FIRE SUPPLY, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,036 F. AWARD BID FOR BUNKER GEAR TO DOOLEY TACKABERRY IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,998 G. VACATE A PORTION OF A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LOCATED ON THE THORNHILL DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY; LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, THORNBRIDGE SOUTH ADDITION; TRACT 9A, S. RICHARDSON SURVEY; AND TIMBER DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY - ORDINANCE NO. 2442 H. VACATE A PORTION OF A WATERLINE EASEMENT LOCATED ON THE THORNHILL DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY; LOT 3, BLOCK 1, THORN BRIDGE SOUTH; TRACT 9A, S. RICHARDSON SURVEY; AND TIMBER DRIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY- ORDINANCE NO. 2441 I. APPROVE 1999/2000 CITY STREET OVERLAY PROGRAM Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Phifer to approve the consent agenda. Motion to approve carried 6-0. City Council Minutes January 10, 2000 Page 3 7. PZ 99-31 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE 10 FENCING REGULATIONS, ARTICLE 11, DEFINITIONS, AND ARTICLE 3, PERMITTED USES RELATIVE TO REQUIRED MASONRY SCREENING WALL REQUIREMENTS, NON-MASONRY SCREENING REQUIREMENTS, SCREENING OF OUTDOOR REFUSE CONTAINERS, SCREENING OF AREAS FOR VEHICULAR STORAGE, SPECIAL SCREENING REQUIREMENTS AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING AND ANY OTHER DELETIONS OR ADDITIONS - ORDINANCE NO. 2444 APPROVED Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, reviewed PZ 99-31, Ordinance No. 2444. Council discussed item. Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. Mr. Steve Johnson, TXU, commented on the mechanical equipment screening requirement. Stating that the screening will be a hindrance to locate TXU equipment in the evening hours and the screening would not allow airflow, possibly leading to overheating. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved to approve PZ 99-31, Ordinance No. 2444, with the exemption of TXU's distribution voltage being 25 KV (kilo volts) or smaller. Councilman Mitchell seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 6-0. 8. PZ 99-33 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF D & G SPECIALTIES, INC. FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A CONVENIENCE STORE AND CAR WASH IN A "C-1" COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. (LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND PRECINCT LINE ROAD ON PROPOSED LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GIBSON ADDITION) - ORDINANCE NO. 2445 APPROVED Ms. Ratcliff summarized PZ 99-33. Mr. Brett Ballinger, applicant, was available to answer questions from Council. City Council Minutes January 10, 2000 Page 4 Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing. Councilman Mitchell moved to approve PZ 99-33, Ordinance No. 2445 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Councilman Metts seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 6-0. 9. PZ 99-40 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF CGS SIGNS TO AMEND THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR LOT 1 R, BLOCK 1, VENTURE ADDITION RELATIVE TO SIGNAGE (EXPO DESIGN AT 4900 DAVIS BOULEVARD)- ORDINANCE NO. 2446 APPROVED Ms. Ratcliff summarized PZ 99-40. Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. Ms. Cindy Boykin, applicant, was available to answer questions. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved to approve Ordinance No. 2446, PZ 99-40 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Councilman Welch seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 6-0. 10. PZ 99-41 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF CARRERA CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACT 4P1, OUT OF THE A.G. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1630 FROM R-7-MF-MULTI FAMILY TO C-2-COMMERCIAL. (LOCATED AT 4004 FLORY STREET.) - ORDINANCE NO. 2447 CONTINUED Ms. Ratcliff summarized PZ 99-41. Mayor Scoma asked if the applicant was available to answer questions. City Council Minutes January 10, 2000 Page 5 Ms. Ratcliff advised Council that the applicant was aware of the public hearing. Mayor Scoma reminded Council of the rules of procedure approved by Council to not recess a public hearing if the applicant is not present. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved to continue the public hearing at the next council meeting. Councilman Milano seconded the motion. Motion to continue carried 6-0. 11. PZ 99-43 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF GRAYTON KOENIG FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACT 2A04, ABSTRACT 1266, S. RICHARDSON SURVEY, ADDRESSED AS 7813 GREEN VALLEY DRIVE FROM AG- AGRICULTURAL AND LR-LOCAL RETAIL TO R-1-S-SPECIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ORDINANCE NO. 2443 APPROVED Ms. Ratcliff, summarized PZ 99-43. Mr. Grayton Koenig, applicant, was available to answer questions. Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing. Councilman Metts moved to approve PZ 99-43, Ordinance No. 2443 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Councilman Phifer seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 6-0. 12. PZ 99-44 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF MARY JANE AND EDWARD LET FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACTS 2A3, 2AB3, AND 2A3, W.C. NEWTON SURVEY ABSTRACT 1182, ADDRESSED AS 7591 AND 7601 PRECINCT LINE ROAD FROM AG-AGRICUL TURAL TO PD-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR A WEDDING CHAPEL AND OTHER ASSOCIATED ACCESSORY WEDDING CHAPEL USES - ORDINANCE NO. 2448 DENIED Ms. Ratcliff summarized PZ 99-44. City Council Minutes January 10, 2000 Page 6 Mr. and Mrs. Edward Lett were available to answer questions. Council discussed item. Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved to approve Ordinance No. 2448, PZ 99-44 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission with the provision that applicant enter into a covenant at such time when sewer service is available. Councilman Phifer seconded the motion. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson amended her motion to include Staff's recommendations: limitation of hours of operation, one driveway entrance and minimum 10% masonry requirement. Councilman Phifer amended his second. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson amended her motion to remove Staff's recommendation of one driveway entrance. Councilman Phifer amended his second. The final motion on the floor is to approve Ordinance No. 2448, PZ 99-44, with the provision that applicant enter into a covenant at such time when sewer service is available and as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission as follows: · The development is tied to the site plan · The ordinance include the proposed regulations submitted by the applicant with the exception that wooden decorative fencing not be allowed. · Include a notation on the site plan that all the pavilions and gazebos will be built in accordance with the Little Bear Creek Flood Plain Control Ordinance No. 2091. · The future land use plan be amended to reflect the subject property as commercial. · The site plan be amended to show either a living screen or a masonry screening wall along the northern property line outside of the Little Bear Creek Corridor. · Recommend City Council waives the zoning case fees the applicant has already paid. Motion also includes Staff's recommendation of no outdoor operations between 11 :00 pm and 7:00 am. Councilman Phifer seconded motion. Motion was denied 4-2; with Mayor Pro Tem Johnson and Councilman Phifer voting for and Councilmen Welch, Mitchell, Metts and Milano voting for denial. City Council Minutes January 10, 2000 Page 7 13. PS 99-36 REQUEST OF BILL J. FENIMORE FOR AN AMENDED FINAL PLAT OF BLOCKS 5,6,7, WOODLAND OAKS ADDITION. (PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AMUNDSON DRIVE AND CRANE ROAD) APPROVED Ms. Ratcliff summarized PS 99-36. Mr. Bill Fenimore, applicant, was not available to answer questions. Councilman Metts moved to waive council procedures and vote on PS 99-36. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson seconded the motion. Motion to waive council procedures carried 6-0. Councilman Metts moved to approve PS 99-36 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission, with the condition that the plat not be filed until the ten-foot electrical easement is abandoned. Councilman Welch seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 6-0. 14. PS 99-38 CONSIDER REQUEST OF MR. MARVIN SMITH, AGENT FOR MR. CHARLES PENNINGTON, FOR A FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 1, PENNINGTON ESTATES. (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST INTER- SECTION OF DOUGLAS LANE AND BURSEY ROAD) APPROVED Ms. Ratcliff summarized PS 99-38. Mr. Marvin Smith, agent, was available to answer questions. Councilman Metts moved to approve PS 99-38 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission which includes a waiver to the required masonry screening wall on Bursey Road. Councilman Phifer seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 6-0. City Council Minutes January 10, 2000 Page 8 15. LRC 99-08 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM JOE WADE, FOR A VARIANCE TO THE LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS, ORDINANCE NO. 2423, TO ALLOW A FIVE-FOOT LANDSCAPE SETBACK WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY IS KNOWN AS LOT 1, BLOCK 1, EATON ADDITION IN A C2- COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. (PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 3819 RUFE SNOW DRIVE) APPROVED Ms. Ratcliff summarized LRC 99-08. Mr. Joe Wade, applicant, was available to answer questions. Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved to approve LRC 99-08 a variance from Ordinance No. 2423, Section 1.G. Landscape Setback to allow a five-foot landscape setback along the Harmonson Road frontage of Lot 1, Block 1, Eaton Addition. Councilman Phifer seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 6-0. 16. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM REGENCY REALTY CORPORATION, FOR AN INTERPRETATION OF THE SIGN REGULATIONS, ORDINANCE NO. 2374, SECTION 13, TO ALLOW MULTIPLE POLE SIGNS. THE PROPERTY IS KNOWN AS BLOCK 4, BRENTWOOD ESTATES ADDITION IN A C1- COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. (PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 8900 NORTH TARRANT PARKWAY) NO ACTION REQUIRED Ms. Ratcliff advised Council that there was a miscommunication between applicant and Staff. The multi-tenant master plan submitted by applicant is in compliance with the sign regulations at the time of submittal. An interpretation is no longer necessary and the applicant has requested to withdraw their request. However the notice has been published and neighbors were notified. The City is required to hold a public hearing. Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing. Mayor Scoma advised Council that no further action is required of Council. City Council Minutes January 10, 2000 Page 9 17. SRC 99-06 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM BANK OF AMERICA, FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE SIGN REGULATIONS, ORDINANCE NO. 2374, SECTION 13, TO ALLOW A POLE SIGN. THE PROPERTY IS KNOWN AS LOT 1, BLOCK A, NORTHLAND SHOPPING ADDITION IN A C1-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. (PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 6100 RUFE SNOW DRIVE) DENIED Ms. Ratcliff summarized SRC 99-06. Mr. Philip Peters, Bank of America representative, was available to answer questions. Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. Mr. David Whitson, 9425 Donna Drive, spoke in favor of proposal # 2. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing. Councilman Milano moved to deny SRC 99-06. Councilman Welch seconded the motion. Motion to deny carried 5-1 with Councilmen Welch, Mitchell, Phifer, Milano and Mayor Pro Tem Johnson voting for denial and Councilman Metts voting for approval. 18. GN 2000-01 - APPOINTMENT OF ADVISORY BOARD FOR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-03 APPROVED Mr. Randy Shiflet, Deputy City Manager, summarized GN 2000-01. Councilman Mitchell moved to approve GN 2000-01 the appointment of advisory board for local law enforcement block grant to the following: Local Police Department Tom Shockley Police Chief Local Prosecutor's Office Mike McEntire Prosecuting Attorney Local Court System Local School System BISD Ray Oujesky Municipal Court Judge Mike Fritz Director of Transportation City Council Minutes January 10, 2000 Page 10 Local Community Group Active in Crime Prevention Lisa Dier President, Citizens' Police Academy Association Motion seconded by Councilman Milano. Motion to approve carried 6-0. 19. GN 2000-02 - RESOLUTION AFFIRMING SUPPORT FOR NEUTRAL TAX TREATMENT OF INTERNET PURCHASES- RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02 APPROVED Ms. Paulette Hartman, Assistant to the City Manager, summarized GN 2000-02. Councilman Mitchell moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Johnson to approve GN 2000-02, Resolution No. 2000-02. Motion to approve carried 6-0. 20. GN 2000-03 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN GUD NO. 8976, TXU LONE STAR PIPELINE'S APPLICATION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION TO INCREASE ITS CITY GATE RATE FURTHER AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION WITH THE STEERING COMMITTEE OF CITIES SERVED BY LONE STAR IN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE RAILROAD COMMISSION AND SUBSEQUENT APPEALS - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-01 APPROVED Mr. Shiflet summarized GN 2000-03. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Mitchell to approve GN 2000-03, Resolution No. 2000-01. Motion to approve carried 6-0. City Council Minutes January 10, 2000 Page 11 21. PW 2000-04 - AWARD OF BID ON WATAUGA ROAD BOOSTER PUMP STATION 1999 IMPROVEMENTS TO MIDST ATE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $201,225.10 APPROVED Mr. Kevin Miller, Public Works Assistant Director, summarized PW 2000-04. Councilman Phifer moved, seconded by Councilman Metts to approve PW 2000-04. Motion to approve carried 6-0. 22. A. CITIZENS PRESENTATION None. B. INFORMATION AND REPORTS Complimentary North Richland Hills Year 2000 calendars are available at City Hall, the Recreation Center, Richland Tennis Center, Library and other various facilities throughout the city. The Recreation Center is conducting registration for Winter/Spring classes. Call 427- 6600 for more information. The Environmental Services Department will be hositng the Enviro Fair at the BISD Fine Arts Complex Saturday, January 22nd from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm. The Critter Connection will be open Saturday, January 22nd from 10:00 am to 6:00 pm at North Hills Mall. City Council Minutes January 10, 2000 Page 12 23. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma adjourned the meeting at 9:37 pm. Charles Scoma - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Police Department Council Meeting Date: 1/24/00 Subject: !=:At rI~tA fnr Pllhli~ HA~ring tn r.nn!::irlAr FytAnrling ()rrlin::!n~A Nn 1 ::,4 Agenda Number: Juvenile Curfew Ordinance for Three Years GN 2000-04 On July 11, 1994 the North Richland Hills City Council unanimously passed Ordinance No, 1994 adopting a curfew for juveniles. On July 24, 1997 Ordinance No, 2177 was approved extending this legislation for three years. Section 370.002 of the Local Government Code adopted by the 74th Legislature on May 31,1995 requires that: (a) Before the third anniversary of the date of adoption of a juvenile curfew ordinance by a general- law municipality or a home-rule municipality or an order of a county commissioner's court, and every third year thereafter, the governing body of the general-law municipality or home-rule municipality or the commissioner's court of the county shall: (1) review the ordinance or order's effects on the community and on problems the ordinance or order was intended to remedy; (2) conduct public hearings on the need to continue the ordinance or order; and '-- (3) abolish, continue, or modify the ordinance or order. (b) Failure to act in accordance with subsections (a) (1) - (3) shall cause the ordinance or order to expire. The North Richland Hills Police Department has found that Ordinance No. 1994 has had a positive effect on the safety of our youth and has reduced the probability that unsupervised juveniles will become involved in crimes during late night and early morning hours. Statistical information maintained by the Police Department has revealed that as a result of this ordinance juvenile victimization during curfew hours since 1993 has dropped by 36% and juvenile related Part I Crimes have dropped by over 66%. Recommendation: To pass Resolution No. 2000-04 setting a public hearing on the Curfew ordinance for February 14,2000, Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev,) Operating Budget Other A Account Number Sufficient Funds Available '-. '- Finance Director Page 1 of -L Resolution No. 2000-04 WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed Ordinance No. 1994's effect upon the community and on problems the curfew ordinance was intended to remedy. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that a public hearing be held on February 14,2000, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council chambers at City Hall, on the need to continue the Curfew Ordinance No. 1994. The continuation, abolishment, or modification of the Ordinance will be considered and acted upon at said time. PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of January, 2000. APPROVED: Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CONTENT: Ci~ APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ~ Tom Shockley, Chief Police CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance/Support Services Council Meeting Date: 1/24/2000 Subject: Award Bid for Roof Replacement to Team Design in the Agenda Number: PU 2000-05 Amount of $27,900 In the 1999/2000 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for roof replacement at the Dan Echols and Bursey Road Senior Centers. Formal bids were solicited and the results are outlined below. Team Design .'..1:'..':1'....<::·1""":,"">,...., .. "" D.o. . ',' ......... . " ':,':'""";:"l~:,,,:::',:,':::':':: Hughes Building Services $28,088 American Consolidated Roofing $28,700 Pierce General Contractors $32,400 $37,971 CEI Roofing '-- The project will include replacing all the bad wood at the Bursey Road Center, replacing the roofs and repainting all the wood at both locations. Team Design met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and can complete the project within 45 days. Recommendation: To award the bid for roof replacement to Team Design in the amount of $27,900. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget X Other ~ ~".(\ c:v Department Head Signature Finance Director Page 1 of -L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS J Department: Public Works Department Council Meeting Date: 1/24/00 Subject: Approve Purchase of Riaht-of-Wav for the Rufe Snow Drive Widening Project Agenda Number: PW 2000-05 City staff and the City's right-of-way consultants are currently acquiring right-of-way for the Rufe Snow Drive Widening Project. The City needs to acquire a total of 52 parcels. Parcels 8 and 24 will bring the total parcels acquired to date to 17. These two parcels are the first with values over $10,000. Parcel 8 is the Southwestern Bell property located at 6638 Watauga Road (corner ofWatauga Road and Rufe Snow Drive). Parcel 24 is the VRB Family LTD. Partnership property located at 5951 Rufe Snow Drive. Parcel 24 is the undeveloped property located north of the railroad tracks in the City of Watauga. The negotiated price for Parcel 8 is $46,000 and the negotiated price for Parcel 24 is $29,750. Recommendation: To approve purchase by the city of Parcel 8 at $46,000 and Parcel 24 at $29,750. ",-- Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other '- Finance Director Page 1 of 21 Seø 99 19:27:38 Tuead.y ..~. ...,0' ----,.~..- GIS No:øUb_wrta_OI!S AML' ' . cIP.m'P.,ml 1-- -."" . - - :I~ ! . ~ -=.:::_-~.,....- ..---:. f =--c.a-..,st\. -.-:=-- -~. .:'::..~....",. .." í ....1--------··/'0 . . ~..~-- .--..!"~".'t'..._.._:___ =-- .' .' .' .."......= " .; - -..C' 0., ... 1:. \ i .' .; : =....'14.... ,,' ¡ --=:"~'- \Ion=:-: '-",. '- / .......lIce.:: / ....~- -......=..: . ...:IK"oo.-==: "~. I . ...~-... ~ . ..:::........-.~~ ~: ~ --=:..'....."'".... .~..._.==- ....-..-"-.,- '- .:l '" '..:¡.".....,~-:::: . 4L ·c¡=ou:.....(. i ~. -==.nu=.~ -. ¡ ~ .,="&,-,,.=: ""..]T. ~ r ~ I .', J:..,-=-.=I=I=aø':-..L,:clt._ __" '\I;~ ;". .;- ~~ '# ~ :;~ .__=.......:c:,.-::::--.~ , ." ~. ..r ..~/ ,... '...' "'to.' ,- .,,, , .~ i . . i --- ·--....·.."1 ". · · i · ! ~:II. ... .1"I...;¡rr.LMI'_"" .:-......-...£... , .í1. __:_~_~ r-':~~.' . ------.----:.-c.- _ .... -\ -::.~aJ.I~ ,-----. !I.' ':. _~.. '!'Y"~'-- :: :¡ ~ I /' ~ ~c" ,; : Æ J i " 49 't \..-- "-r......,..:..._:. PLOT: rUfo..now 3 ..rtl : " -- i - . - cunoo. ø- -=====: \==~0Ir·'.-=-:- "', "-=--"I:O't.-. . . l ; . -=-- !~-...'n:.. -=-="''''l1:li Io...~_ .,~~ ==- CMh....·... ----: L.tIiC...... IN -_ -'~ . ....O'ICI..LWO.~(..,.........)=-- =i--====- ~- Parcel No. 8 Parcel No. 24 ----==== """"M. -...... ....,.. ~/ .~sc_.-::...~ Ii i J ,; i ~ Rufe Snow Dr. ~("S:~EA'r~ 'I, "-'·"""'""-5' - -t- ~.- . - t r.e e ~-----=-~~ Imffrovem-ents~_ I 820 to ~3--"'!.'¡, ~,-,.,........ '. . . ~- ! Mi d-C'iti es=B Ivd-.,,~· i : I) )i 1 )) ); :. 0. J' j } II ! 'I f' : : /l /1 l ~I :.: , If Deøutment of Informltion Servicn· Gngr.øhic Informltlon Sy.tem. (GIS) ! . =====- ====.,e_..:o.:=== Ii i i ! i ...··';41'·11:.... ....ocr.:....... ~IM:.. "AMeClft[I':'..-==-- . I u o . o . ¡W(aN......~.. I~ I ~ _i -.,.....a&.-,.;,~ Rute Snow Dr. ('STEA) Street Improvements I.H. 820 to Mld..Clties Blvd. I ! I =.....-c....-:DII:'.-=. I ,.-=.... ,£~ ~ !., :: 'r.~ . . --=-~ N '\ .. ~ E '\ ,......11 w Ii . . ~ ....,..c.:c"._~ ... ~ ..~ "'.-.. c." \\ s ¡ i . .. i . N$RTH i Ii i i RICHLAND . . I . .. . .. I ¡ ë HILLS i ~.O#-.... ~ ......"" ... -.... ----' I f i -~ [ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 01/24/00 Subject: Consider the Site Plan Review of Lots 2R, 3 and 4, Block 1, Agenda Number: PZ 99-34 Davis-North Tarrant Parkway Addition - Thornbridge Crossing and Zoned C1 - Commercial. This Property is Located at the Southeast Corner of North Tarrant Parkway and Davis Boulevard in the 8400 Block of Davis Boulevard. Case Summary Mr. Robert Katzen of Centrefund Development (Texas) Corporation submitted a site plan review for a commercial development within 200 feet of a residential zoning district. The applic~nt is proposing to develop a shopping center called Thornbridge Crossing on lots 2R, 3 and 4, Block 1, Davis-North Tarrant Parkway Addition. The three lots contain 15.39 acres._ . The Thornbridge Crossing development is proposed to be developed at this time with three buildings. The three buildings have a total square footage of 96,337 square feet, which covers 14.37% of the site. Tom Thumb, the major anchor tenant, is proposed to be built on Lot 3. Lots 2 and 4 are only being partially developed at this time. The applicant is providing 462 spaces for the entire site, 386 spaces are required which is 76 spaces more than required. The applicant is providing 36% of the entire site as landscaping at this time. As lots 2 and 4 are developed this will be reduced but will be required to meet the minimum of 15% of each lot. Lot 3 is also proposed to be developed with a gas station towards Davis Boulevard and a drive-through pharmacy along the northern side of the Tom Thumb building. The applicant will be providing a turn around for the pharmacy to prevent the general public from using the truck access driveway at the rear of the development to access the pharmacy. The applicant submitted the application on October 25, 1999 and is not subject to the amendments requiring offset facades, nor the revised landscape ordinance requirements for 15 foot landscaped front yard and the15 foot buffer yard adjacent to single family development. The Commission looked very closely at the proposed light standards. They recommended in their motion to minimize the height of two light poles shown to be 30 feet high. The applicant noted that reducing the height was not a problem. Thè applicant did not want to remove the light poles for traffic safety reasons because they are illuminate the entry driveway and direct cars in and out of the development. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget o her Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available / ~ Signature ~ ~ ~~œœœ~' City Manager S ture -; \\NRH_CITY_HALL2\VOL 1\DATA\Pz\Cases\PZ Cases\PZ 99-34-41 SP Tom Thumb Davis,doc Page 1 of 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS J RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on January 13, 2000, recommend approval of PZ 99-34, Site Plan review of Lots 2R, 3 and 4, Block 1, Davis-North Tarrant Parkway Addition, Thornbridge Crossing, in the 8400 Block of Davis Boulevard with the following conditions by a vote of 7 to O. · To remove the 16 parking spaces at the rear of Lots 3 and 4, that face toward the single family development in the Thornbridge Additions. · To minimize the height of the two light poles along the southern driveway entrance of Lot-4, which is due north of the single family Lots 8 and 9, Block ?, Thornbridge Phase IV-Ä To approve PZ 99-34 Site Plan Review of Lots 2R, 3 and 4, Block 1, Davis North Tarrant Parkway, Thornbridge Crossing, in the 8400 Block of Davis Boulevard as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. r~ J I ~¥' CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM \\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1\DATA\PZ\CaseS\PL ....i:llitftll/"'L ::1::1-,)4-4+ I ~... I urn IlIurnu Lli:lVIIi,UUC Page 2 of2 fA rCH L lifE - SEE Cr i rJ. :.?~:~§2. .J3.ag.e.:.DLL.._. D íP.1...\A2 " nlA; ------.- '5 -R.1JA.; '" -I " '" '" " ... r- '" ---SH I '~ sC}-~ ~ I'" R-2: æ 1222-·-jO! I~ .~-~ ----.... .J, ~ <0.:: ~ "R.lÜE1 "PACT :A AG PZ 99-34 SITE PLAN APPROVAL LOTS 2R, 3 & 4 DAVIS/NORTH TARRANT PARKWAY CP1jA \ --_._._-_._~-~ ~'" ;'i'A\.:T H ~~.~ C-1 1198 ;c,A,' ::.' .~'! f NÖRTHTARRANTP~ -I, 31'3/ / :>_ - IA c-, :J"¡"i - AG \,\\ù\ , \) \ì ~ \v' :' \~\" AG C-1 23:13 -) '~I,\, ,..--" 'ATCH LINE - SEE Grid: 90-444 Page: D3 ~.", Tr.>. -':. ~ . , SHADY GROVE Rp ,_"I 'RACT 4(: 'RACT -:.13 '~.¡,_., ~,"': ~ ':..' NORTH TARRANT PKWY "'¡.'- jl C-1 1254 f;Ar' "ì "f; .. -I - -1.-.--, ::c: ~ R·1 z 2059 - ---- ctI '" o ___·0 ,. n --.-- ..... .... ::c: -I ::c: o '" z '" , AG --"--'-- --- '" .... r- '" o '" z ~ > -< n -I _._~ 1;7 n CI .... '" ~------- -----0 '" -~_.- ---~.- ') ,) _.~~~--.------.--- -_.-- -- _ .1.],", ~~, J j~ THROUGH: Ordinance 2360, January ZONING MAP Grid: 90-448 . ~"0b""-C THORNMEð,D-,Q.~_C_T-. - " ",.. ",,', ,,' ,.1, ,. ADOPTED: March 22. 1993 CURRENT . .. City ot Nol1t1 Richland Hills 7301 N,E. Loop 820 Nol1t1 Aichfand Hills. TX 76180 817· 58t ·55t5 Property Location: Street Address of Property: Legal Description ot Property: Property Owner Information: Name ot Property Owner: Application for Site Plan Review Ní~H (""-MIII_u) North Tarrant Parkway @ Davis Davis - N Tarrant Addition Block 1, Lots 2R, & 4 Centre fund Development (Texas) Corp. Phone No. 972/790 - 3 9 9 6 Address of Property Owner: ,333 Plymouth Park City: Irving lip: TX State: 75061 Applicant / Authorized Agent Information: -Note: An affidavit signed by the property owner is required when the agent is not the property owner- Name ot Applicant I Authorized Agent: Robert Katzen Phone No. 9 72 / 7 9 0 - 3 9 9 6 Address: 333 Plymouth Park City: Irving State: TX lip: 7 5 0 6 1 -'- Type of Site Plan Review: T Planned Development Specific Use Permit i R-6- T T ownhomes :----i R-7-MF Mufti-tamilly -_.. - -. 'Sp!éiâï .-------- _. ----~ Planned Use Townhomes Mufti.familv Development P!rmil .--.-.------.-.------- 1, P!:t Plan showing !xis:ing & ~!a.~r.:d structures. bldg. flOes, boundaries. ¡nd easemenlS. R R R R -- - -- ....... --------.-------.----.--. 2, Topographic intormation with c:n:curs drawn al !'No tool inlervals. R R --------.·_·0- -__.._...... __0. 3, Elevation drawings ot all buildings indicating the proposed exterior finish materials. R R R R ......--.-. - .-.....-- ----...---------.- 4, Landscaping. lighting. tencing. sca:ning. and waD. indicating an heighlS. R R R R . -.-- ---------------- 5, Location ot egress and ingress. R R R R ... ·0-- __ _.. _._______ ____ _ .. ..._...~.__. ~_. ,_~ __ C::'>tr~el parking an~ loading tac:lities, ___ R __ _ _ R ], All p!desman walks. malls. and c~~n areas. R R -----... .-..-.... .-.. 8, .P~::::~ed lan~ uses indicating a:~as in square fee!. _ ___, ." .. . . __ /1.. R 9, Lcca~on & types ot signs. induding lighting and heighlS with elevation drawings, R R -_._--~- . ....... 10, Sire!! names on proposed s:ree!J. R ----------....--- 11, Existing & proposed waler, sewer. & drainage systems: grading plan. . __ J3 . . ~.2. Engineering drawings ot all public improvements 10 be ded~!ed ~ the C~ty,_ .~3, U~ljlY and drainage easements! Iccation ot solid waste ~isposal tacilIities, 1.~, :\~d~o..nal i!,!"~<!uired t:r.~e City C~uncil, __. __ __ _ ._ _____ No!~: "R' = Required Required Documents: The following table contains a checklist at the minimum items required tor Site Plan Review. - -----.- -..---- ------...-.. -.- ~.."..----.......-. . I certIfy lt1atl am. or represent. lt1e oó\r¿r of (fie property descnbed ¡cove and I:ereby submit (fIis Site Plan to (fie City of NorJ1 Richtand HIlts for review 3nd approvaL ;..- "', \' \ Date: (O-Z.r-?~ __ \,:::) u" \ , \"".r.~: . R R R (Can be sUbm~ned at time ot planing) R R R R Your name (Printed Name): _~obe r:!:.._~_~~ z ~r::.-. Sign Site Plan Review Application ?9; «1q. !.If 3 R R - . .-. R R R R R - -~-\ \-::¡ChL :.~~~\~ ':...:' :~¿ 11""". ...~. . i::~' cc::.'-'-'-~\' ~,. ç. ' "':. ", \i~ .~~ ') ~ ~ r'~ Â- " },... . " " .......... . ,'..~.~';~~ ::.~~":'~~':' co -419 (2 - 98) " .,______.._~____.._'__.'_._"N.~~____~.. City of North Richtand Hills 7301 N,E. Loop 820 North Richfand Hills. TX 76180 817·581 - 5515 Property Location: Street Address of Property: Legal Description of Property: Property Owner Information: Name of Property Owner: Application for Site Plan Review Ni~H (PltUtøml"_ul North Tarrant Parkway @ Davis Davis - N Tarrant Addition Block 1, Lots 3 Randall's Properties Phone No. 713 / 2 6 8 - 3 6 61 Address of Property Owner: 3663 Briarpark City: Houston Slate: TX Zip: 77042 Applicant / Authorized Agent Information: -Note: An affidavit signed by the property owner is required when the agent is not the property owner- Name of Applicant I Authorized Agent: Joe Rollins Phone No. 713/268-3661 Address: 3663 Briarpark City: Houston Stale: TX Zip: 77042 --.- ------_.._----~. Type of Site Plan Review: T Planned Development Specific Use Permit ~ ~ R-6- T T ownhomes R- 7 ·MF Multi-familly Required Documents: The following table contains a checklist of the minimum items required for Site Plan Review, --·---··SpëòaT-- Planned Use Developmenl P'!t!nit . ----_.-._._--- --.--.-.------.....--.---- ~_ ?!ct ?Ian showing !xiS:i~g_& ~ia:1ned structures. bldg,lines. boundaries. and easements. _-13_ ,. ... __R___ __. R ___ _ _ _.-B..._ _ _, 2, T cpographic information with c::n:curs drawn at two toot intervals. R R ---.---.--.-..- ---..-.-.- --. 3, Elevation drawings of all buildings indicating the proposed exterior finish materials. R R R R .."..0__-_. . ._..__.__. .___... _______~.... 4. Landscaping. lighting. fencing. 5CtHning. and wall. indicating aD heights. R R R R -_. -------------- .5,_~~tionofe~essandingr:55. ___.__________f1_.. R R'h._.._é1. ._. _~_.C~'5rreetparking and loading facilities. ,---____~____E!... __ __R 7, AD p!desman walks. maUs. and cp!n areas. R R _____._ 0_...__-.... ..." ._._.___..... .. ._. . 8. P~:oosed land uses indicating a:~as in squar~ Ie!!. R R ... ----- -- ---.--. - - ... 9, Lcca~on & types of signs. induëU1g lighting and heighls with elevation drawings, R R .- - -----.--.-... .-. . 10. Slreel names on proposed streets. R ------.-... --- II, Existing & proposed water. sewer. & drainage systems; grading plan, R -- -- ._- - 12, Engineering drawings of all public improvements to be dedicated to l!1e City, ._- ..--- -.--- .~3, U~lity and drainag! easements & Iccation of solid waste ~isposal faci¡~~s. 1~, Additional items as r!quired by~! City Council. .. - -------.------.-.---.-.- .-- No!~: 'R' = Required --- ------.. Townhomes ' Multi-family -..-....------......-. . R R R R R - - R R R ---_. R (Can be Subm~lted at time o! p~~~~) ,. R R R R R R I certify ttldt I dm. or represent. ttle O,·.r., 01 the properry descnbed dCQve and hereby submit this Sile Pldn 10 the City of Nor.tl Richldnd Hilts lor review and approval, Dale: ---.--------- -- CO·419(2-98} ------ Your name {PrinledName}: Joe Ro 11 ins Site Plan Review Application 3 ,'- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS \ "'- Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 0 1/24/00 Subject: Continue Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Agenda Number: PZ 99-41 Carrera Consulting Engineers, Inc. for a Zoning Change on Tract 4P1, out of the AG. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1630 from R-7-MF-Multi Family to C2-Commercial. (Located at 4004 Flory Street) - Ordinance 2447 CASE SUMMARY Carrera Consulting Enginè"ers'; Inc., has submitted a zoning change request for Mr. Feliciano Padron to rezone a total 1.60 acres from R-7-MF to C2 Commercial. The owner, Mr. Padron, would like to operate his lawn service business at this site. The property is undeveloped and unplatted and will be required to be platted prior to the issuance of any building permits. The proposed rezoning is in compliance with the Future Land Use Plan. Mr. Padron owns the separate triangular shaped tract to the north that contains 3,092 square feet and is zoned C-2-Commercial. The tract is undevelopable because of its size and it does not have access to a public street. If this request is approved, all of his contiguous property will be zoned C2 and could be platted as a single lot. The applicant was not present at the scheduled public hearing on January 10, 2000. City Council voted to continue the public hearing. .''--" Surrounding Future & Existina Land Uses The subject property is designated as Commercial. North: South: East: West: Future Land Use Commercial Commercial High Density Residential Commercial Existing Land Use City Drainage Easement & ABC Wrecker Service Keystone Body Shop Residential Vacant RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their public hearing on December 9, 1999, recommended approval of PZ 99-41 by a vote of 7 to O. To approve Ordinance 2447 and PZ 99-41 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev,) Operating Budget er Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available ') ~ Finance Director L:\Cases\PZ Cases\PZ 99-41-42 Carrera Consulting Engineers,doc Page 1 of 1 ~':"':: I. v-------.-s;;;'~-·-----------:-- . I ' i ~~~~" : : , 'S o - = .~ :rJ - ~ MANOR DR - . ~þ~~ '\ \:\ G, ~OS:~\)\)~ 1 1 ! i i , .. , I I Q 3 ~ ;-~. ~ -", .;.:; 2G5 i :G5 -~, , 'F .. - I-- _R~_ ~..~ 17~O :;¡ '.- -:~ll~' ¡.~: . .. :,:I¡ ". ~1>--\1. 0 _ '\~G."<:' '" :l1li_ oQ-ro.-!=-- '~ "" '~~ .. ~.. DR \..:, : \ \~ 'at 1'" \œt \ ...,.-.---. -..,.. , ._ .J, ~ " rR, I 3. 11> TR. .... ~t ~2C.'SIXì6 :;1 . HAR " ~V\\t\1.1- >J.C - ~ # TR. èU - - 'J ..... " ~ .. C3 :--,. /ú ~ ,- " .. - /r.,y " 'c,"'/ 0~' ,,& ,~ " " / : ~ _~þ.:s .C8i5-q4P~ 2S2~ ,~~::o - "::::::::::::::::':':': " Q) 'J?-. ~ 1 c ~ :~~:::::::::~~::::::::' > - .~:I:-':':':':':':':::':::::::::: ~ ' _I ::::::::::::~:~:~:~:~:~:~::.':::::::::::: '-I Q) ........... ...... e--2 ~ ~ C-2 g, êi5 1145 0 ~ ~ ~£~?i 1C3-12 ~ - ::J SC 8. U. , . '. \11 t;'-.! ~-C:~-T ò8 II C-2' 1 I ~ _ :. ~ 13 - ,"'I 0 - ---- c:'~ ;M; [., .' ,-I. I ~ 1<> 7 ~H-' . Harmonson Road ,,::. -,,'~')'I ,. ", \..\ 't ' " ,- .~ - 'i:\ ',.:,\) ,,_ À \) o(t' , _ C-2 ~ ....-;A';) J.!'f: \ l . TR,2Su 19 "("') > '8 I, ~ > '7 1--l3~ ~ 5 , r - t; - '" I- In C-1 .. -;- > ( : III: 0 '" 5 ... ... :: ; " . ~ W. 9A ~ 3 IR.2Bo& l \oOR Q :-- ~~C-2 ". 317 " i~1 !!I 'S ....,.., ,1ft U." ... , . ¡~ø'i I S' ,?,"r ,,\I , · TR.:D1 "\)\)', , " - '2B \\ ',') '-0 íR...... , r---G:4 - r-- 1:1 '24 I TR. I '" ,~4"'1 ".20: 1 :D' :?1 'I,A -~.4toA : > : I 5atiA ("') n '~ ~ r-~:- ",. ..... --;;- "ª- :l1li "'" -~ ~ "'" > 1 ... . roo '" ... 4 2 a s ,; "" 3 ~ IS '---~ :0 ~ 1 ::r :~- - -." ~) þ..~'\l I , : IZ~i 11 o , 8 ,Õ) ,1/ 9 o T~..jAA r 'mJ :,_.~1._,,:,. . I II!, ...,. ou Tit 2C;7 A ' i . I I _ TR 21! '1'- :-"'4A ~ ZC.iJ8· :'!!II LU F ~ " TR.2IoU r~ LR - TR..::.,..; " PZ 99-41 4004 FLORY STREET ZONING CHANGE MF TO C2 ..., ,,¡ 10 : ONYX DR N I , '\.:.ç.;.:y 7 -rp ! . ? : , , : ~ I "'" ex j ... ~\ ' - ~~ .~e ø~" ~'1>- ç - 0'" 1 1 :J :4 I ~ I 15 ~ '" I i'~ 0 , 'Ít, I) Þ ~. J 8B : .,q;;:J \- 3C ,') - 'Y' Br~ , '- 8C J C-2 ~ 8£1 3R 17 18 19 'n '1 , JANNIE ST - ., ~ - " , , - ò .~ .... . ; - .., 'Q 'Y -'.",,\ ... .: ;. .),sl _ ~ :'ó I o MARIE ST -: .~ TR.iA. '! - 'f; .. " - '&.. ;.L - - -1-8- .' . . /êí" ~ - - ,,?': ~ - . '. ~O,' 'ù . ~ '. - J. -~-------- "::t '- " 'p. TR.... "- R -7-M~ TR'..&N'T ~ rr:~.4.W " C-2 1549 ~' R-3 . }1-7-62-- CRO%S'" -:- m....T' '" \,,0" , E-:" \,____~ 1)0 :,. '- R-7-MF lit;' - (') f-';\:z,Q. ..... ~ ~ C') . _ C') " - lit TR,4C I 1!!.-7-MF - i T1Uv ...... !RoM 0 ". - I ",- .~ jR.7-MF \ \': \:' "'- ~ ('2. \; -= - " ·C·2 "'". ~178 ~1-- c~:i=-h- i1626 f c- ~U"': "'... , :) r~·L ·0 '!..: . ,AI _ ~,'- , ß':: :Q ?t><\?"~~ "q-""'.:. C-2 .¡.,~ ., .. 1399 .... ,,-'- ....~ 0 ~ 0" "'" ~ ......~ .~ ...'" .. ,.",fò C::>~ 2. .. a "'(' '0 ~" ~ "" '" ;:o:¡ C~ :JO - " ,. ',1 < ..-. ~' " ,)..- _I ,~ 13 Draft Copy 17. PZ 99-41 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF CARRERA CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACT 4P1, OUT OF THE A.G. WALKER SURVEY, A-1630 FROM R7-MUL TI-FAMIL Y TO C2-COMMERCIAL. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 4004 FLORY STREET. APPROVED Carrera Consulting Engineers, Inc., has submitted a zone change request for Mr. Feliciano Padron to rezone a total 1.60 acres. Mr. Padron would like to operate his lawn service business- 5-Star Lawn Service at this site. The property is unplatted at this time and will be required to be platted prior to any building construction. The property is currently undeveloped at this time. The proposed rezoning is in compliance with the Future Land Use Plan. Mr. Padron owns the triangular shaped tract to the north that contains 3,092 square feet and is zoned C-2-Commercial. This same tract is undevelopable because of its' size and it does not have access to a public street. If this request is approved all of his property will be zoned the same thing and they could be platted as one piece of property. Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve PZ 99-41 to rezone Tract 4P10ut of the AG. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630 from R-7-MF- Multi Family to C-2-Commercial at 4004 Flory Street. Chairman Bowen opened the public hearing and called for proponents. Seeing none and seeing no opponents, the public hearing was closed. Staff stated that one letter of support had been received and were included in the Commissioners packets. This letter of support was from Glen Carlin of 3936 Flory Street. Mr. Tolbert, seconded by Mr. Welch, moved to approve PZ 99-41. The motion carried unanimously. P & Z Minutes November 11, 1999 22 Case #: PZ 99-41 CARRERA CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Procedure to Respond: ASr~:~perty Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract or an interested citize , I (approve) (Pi ~) and/or (have the following comments): Print Name: /-1 ~ ..Ç, ({ II-S S E Lt. Print Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: J '7';;1 I """) C R ~S ]) P .J Signature:~. ,f'~ Phone No.(t/1~~-Ðl.J? Direct questions and mail responses to: Planning Department City of North Richland Hills, Texas 7301 N E Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Telephone: (817) 427-6300 Fax: (817) 427-6404 L\Property Owner Notificatin\PZ 99-4 I-Property Owner Letter.doc 'NI~H APPLICATION FOR A ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas (Please print or type all responses) 817-581-5500 . 'ART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant / agent: c.AR.R.~tz.A c.OV\SU'-"T~NGa ~ÑG.lh~~S. I }Ioo!oC. Street address of applicant/agent: ?:J30 Nìe.R.E~liH Äùc.. City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: DAL.L.A-S l~' iL?Zll PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Telephone number of applicant / agent: (214) 330-4771 Street address at location where zoning district chañgè is being requested: 4004- F L.or<: 'T STR't..U Legal Description of Property where zoning district change is being requested: T\'Z.A.C..'T 4-P\, rt\V\+ cJf -t~e A.E-,~ LJA\..~E:I~ ~URU~~I Ab~TrAt.T "-10' 1l..30, TA.l' I' <...7 Co. ,>1"')( Current zoning classification: Proposed zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: ~ f C. 2. lAWIIJ SE:.R\llc..E Reason for zoning district change: o~e W'~lE. L.AW",- SerUtc...c::.. iSo(¡ '" ~s s. --- Surveyor map attached as required by application: ! XJ Yes D No ART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner: DYes o No rvame of property owner: rELlc.l A t-JO Street address of property owner: \ 100 NONTegRfY ~T- City / State / Zip Code of property owner: PA DR eN ßEDFo(2.\';> , \e;><.A.S ((gO'Z.2. Note: Attach letter or affidavit from property owner if different from applicant / agent: Telephone number of property owner: (611 ) 545 - O"S4- G:. Date: l g Jò ue """' e,e: C2. l':) c:> ~ I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the property described above and do hereby submit this request for approval of a zoning district change to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration, Print Name: "'Ç€,\...lClAr-.J C ÞfttD1<.,ON Signature: j¡. . ~j,~ . PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY f Date ,f ;'nl ~ Z?q qmmiSSion Public Hearing: Date of City Council Public Hearing: Taxes Paid? [J Yes [~NO Case Number: I/'Z.. ~q - L/ I Fee: DYes [JNO Zoning District Change Approved: I : Yes [--1 No , ---' '---.0 , l Yes '- $300.00 ~~No 'lions of Approval: This application will not be scheduled for public hearing until application fee is received, Zoning District Change CD - 407 (2/97) LAND USE STATEMENT FOR APPLICATION OF ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE Applicant............ Feliciano Padron, DBA 5-Star Lawn Service Applicant's Address.. 1100 Monterrey Street Bedford, Texas 76022 Property............. Tract 4P1, 1.60 Acre of land and the 3092.73 SF area of land north of the northeast corner of Tract 4P1 Property Address..... 4004 Flory Street Current Zoning....... MF Proposed zoning...... C2 The purpose of this application for a Zoning District Change is to allow 5-Star Lawn service, a commercial business, to operate its business out of this location. The existing land use on the area of request is MF. The adjoining properties are zoned Commercial. The proposed land use on the area of request is a lawn service, consisting of office & warehouse use. The total property area is 1.6 acres plus a 3092.73 square feet area of land at the northeast corner of this tract. Included with the 1.6 acre tract, is an existing drainage easement, and a 3485.67 square feet area of land deeded to the city of North Richland Hills, as recorded in Volume 6357, Page 848, Deed Records, Tarrant county, Texas. A new building for this lawn service business is planned to be constructed in accordance with the City of North Richland Hills requirements. ORDINANCE NO. 2447 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1874 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS, GRANTING ZONING CHANGE Z99-41 ON A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE A.G. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTARACT NO. 1630, DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID TRACT FROM "R-7-MF" MULTI FAMILY DISTRICT TO "C2" COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILlTL Y; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200) FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH AN OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; AND PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, applications were made to amend the Official Zoning Map, City of North Richland Hills, Texas by making applications for same with the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas as required by State statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills and all the legal requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having come before the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas after all legal notices, requirements conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested change should be granted or denied; safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off- street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light and air, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills at a public hearing called by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested change Ordinance No, 2447 Page 1 of 5 should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards, panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the effect on the promotion of health and general welfare, the effect on adequate light and air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of population, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout this city; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas does find that there is a public neèessity for the zoning change, that the public demands it, that the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and does find that the change in zoning lessens the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land; avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas has determined that there is a necessity and need for this change in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this property was originally classified; and therefore, feels that a change in zoning classification for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City North Richland Hills, Texas and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City of North Richland Hills Ordinance No 1874, being the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, is hereby amended and changed by Zoning Application PZ 99-41 to rezone the following described property to wit: Being tract 4P1, containing 1.60 acre situated in the AG, Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1630, Deed Records of Tarrant County (located at 4004 Flory Street), more fully and completely described by metes and bounds in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof which was previously zoned "R-7-MF" Multi Family District to "C2" Commercial District, all in accordance with Zoning Ordinance No. 1874 as amended. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein. Ordinance No, 2414 Page 2 of 5 Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City of North Richland Hills zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community, Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed two hundred dollars ($200.00) and a separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety, morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business, property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that ~h~s ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and It IS accordingly so ordained. Ordinance No, 2414 Page 3 of 5 APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THE 9th DAY OF DECEMBER 1999. ~d~ Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission ~/4 .;t/~I ~ Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 10th DAY OF JANUARY 2000. ATTEST: Mayor City of North Richland Hills, Texas City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APARPVED AS TO CONTENT: : ! 4 if I Planrll!:!9 vetor Ordinance No, 2414 Page 4 of 5 Exhibit "A" of Ordinance 2447 . . . q) o II") "" ..... - ." "....:' "". . _' .~ .1 " PL.Aa: OF IEG1tIINIHG ,~ SAVE AND EXCEPT o o o .-4 G€'ßE'~ 571ß1~1 S'¡t(; . z. '7 ~ f- W... Wu a;< ....~ lI'I;:) - U'I 0 EAST 3.qS.8' ... A T ~ .21' ·11.3 .1.3~ ...: ~ --:::~e.~1 5 i. __ - e.~~'" &,;:...:.------ Q,3- ~..~ 7,.,ø- O\\..~O\.' i~ -- I, Q-I , WEST 85.46' :I: ..... :::> o Ion pL.ACE OF BEGINNING DESCRIPTION OF PRCPERTY lõ >-... a::~ o~ .-J~ ....~ o 0, N .. 1.60 ACRES' o o I"\.J BEING a part of the A. G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1630 in Tarrant County, Texas __ described by metes and bounds ~ as follows: 5 BECINNING at an jron roc \.fì 834.5 feet (304 varas j East and 448.7 feet (158.7 var~s) South of the North~est corner of the A. C. Walke; Survey, said point being within the Will Sno~ prope;tv: THENCE South 200 feet t~ an iron rod for corner; corner in the East line of .... :~ Õ ..... .::> '" a::; o 0 z ~ WES7 3.qa,g' THENCE West 348.9 feet to an iron pin for Flory Street; THENCE North alonq said R.O.W. line 200.0 feet to an ~HENCE East 348.8 feet to the place of be?inning and acres Of land, more or less. iron pin for corne~ containing l.6 Ordinance No, 2414 Page 5 of 5 Draft Copy 17. PZ 99-41 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF CARRERA CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACT 4P1, OUT OF THE A.G. WALKER SURVEY, A-1630 FROM R7-MULTI-FAMILY TO C2-COMMERCIAL. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 4004 FLORY STREET. APPROVED Carrera Consulting Eñgineers, Inc., has submitted a zone change request for Mr. Feliciano Padron to rezone a total 1.60 acres. Mr. Padron would like to operate his lawn service business- 5-Star Lawn Service at this site. The property is unplatted at this time and will be required to be platted prior to any building construction. The property is currently undeveloped at this time. The proposed rezoning is in compliance with the Future Land Use Plan. Mr. Padron owns the triangular shaped tract to the north that contains 3,092 square feet and is zoned C-2-Commercial. This same tract is undevelopable because of its' size and it does not have access to a public street. If this request is approved all of his property will be zoned the same thing and they could be platted as one piece of property. Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve PZ 99-41 to rezone Tract 4P10ut of the AG. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630 from R-7-MF- Multi Family to C-2-Commercial at 4004 Flory Street. Chairman Bowen opened the public hearing and called for proponents. Seeing none and seeing no opponents, the public hearing was closed. Staff stated that one letter of support had been received and were included in the Commissioners packets. This letter of support was from Glen Carlin of 3936 Flory Street. Mr. Tolbert, seconded by Mr. Welch, moved to approve PZ 99-41. The motion carried unanimously. P & Z Minutes November 11, 1999 22 1.::-... c. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS \.._- Department: PlanninQ & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 01/24/2000 Subject: Consider the ReQuest of Joe Wade for Site Plan Approval Agenda Number: PZ 2000-01 of a Commercial Development on Property known as Lot 1, Block 1, Eaton Addition. This Property is Located at the SWC of Harmonson Road and Rufe Snow Drive. Case Summary: Mr. Joe Wade has submittep ~_request for Site Plan Approval of a commercial development on property known as Lot 1, Block 1, Eaton Addition. This Property is Located at the SWC of Harmonson Road and Rufe Snow Drive. The long and narrow configuration of the parcel creates an awkward site plan. At the January 10 City Council meeting, Mr. Wade was granted a variance from the landscape regulations to allow a five-foot landscaped setback from Harmonson Road instead of the required 15-foot setback. The applicant is providing 5,486 s.f. of landscaped area where 8,660 s.f. is needed to meet the 15% landscaped area requirement. To satisfy the requirement, they have utilized landscape credits by providing extra trees on the Rufe Snow frontage. The applicant has worked diligently with staff to see that the site meets all other requirements of the landscape regulations. As required by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the applicant is providing an Austin stone finish to the eastern elevation of the Building #1, which faces Rufe Snow. The remaining elevations will have a rough masonry painted finish. The location of the dumpster at the west end of Building #3 is where the applicant was directed to locate it by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on January 13, 2000, recommended approval of PZ 2000-01 by a vote of 7 to 0 with the following conditions: 1. Provide a brick or cut stone finish to the eastern elevation of Building #1 facing Rufe Snow. 2. Relocate the dumpster to in-between Buildings #2 and #3 or to the end of building #3. To aoorove PZ 2000-01 as recommended bv the Plannina and Zonina Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Oth r Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaCle '- Lb Finance Director ~t~ L:\Cases\PZ Cases\PZ 99-23-41 Sileverado Site Plan.doc Page 1 of 2 ~-~~O ~. z ~ .H/RE DR 0 .... I' g ::: z .", 1: - R·1 ~ -173"9 ~ '"' '"' '" 1 URC CT 26 to> :<: ::; _6-- -. ::::.. .,c:. ~ ~ '-" "Ot:-- ...",~ ~:;vrsc~ - r='_."'92 ~;o :..:~ ~~A2 - '" 2A.2.A TR.2A} ~A?R R·3-~700 1796 ~.:(: IR-4-D -T-----~3.B.Q. '" R-3-1700 ~ 1796 ,., .~~'. TR r:= 2JJ :,;..; :Jf>:- ~.... ~ lA£ 1_ :"' Y. _. '" '. , -14 - ë - ~ "" ~'\'- '" - ~ 0 C'1 .. "' ... y Z '" "' Q. IN ST .. "" ~ .... 1 '" .... - .", . < l- .. ._-~~ ... "" "" ... "" - ... LR ~~ 'e ... t, -------- MIKE DIt I ~ þ.\)\)' '" :0 -. : R-7-MF .. , ~ \)';) ~ \..~~\ 1 C þ.':' '\ I 1)'1<':''3 1 ~ n > PZ 2000-01 ... 3: > BLOCK 1, LOT 1, EATON ADDITION 0 ... SITE PLAN APPLICATION ,- 1.3 R·-4-D q~...:-' ,;, i~' ;I.~~~''''' .I'\'. -i¡ -(;---2-- ----; Wi" ' ., >. :: æ. ~ O,,,::'t-. Z0 _ rJ) e~2~ ::::I a::: ",.- '-=-Ii~ " , 'Q', ,~' ~G~.' 2 ,,-~;;';\ : PD"18 2006 ..." .'" u~ 1Q...... > ..... n R~3 ". ,. "'" "' .., '" .... 2 ... '" '" ro- "' ... '" > ... ~ t) SUP 2255 _<1.... , \~~-- ~, 1 '0' n>. 29' TIi! rp 1B: æ3 '0' T'R.2ftA '" 1 ( z ...¡ >- ~Il.:£u ... Z ':'1iJ,,:[~ 0 ::: ""';:f.:f..c ~"':E"C =" ~~""[..r , - Ii UP ¡", \"" c ,"" . F " . ';¡;n' '"L.'Tt.: TR~['- 3 "' It¡ n>, 3 n>, , ,", '" 2G~ <"< :ç,:¡ ~ 2G/. '"' IR-3 Te :~~ '" <') : <') u. U <. 2~ ncr: "'"... :.. '~1 Of "' , ::n ~o...t \~.\p. .... ,0 "C"' . '" "'~. '1380 1 r. r¡¡ ". " , ;. 6' R-3 ~~,I'I'~'\ "'< , TO ~ ~ TO TO " " ,- :>: 2K~ 2'" il"~ 2t(f: ~,~ - - :;"3 C-2 1 '-- 1<, "'" 'R..... : ".3< LR , . .-, Tþ"":",, ~, \" )..~\.,I.' ' -:1':1 ";:;.';:'Wr ') '1\ \~, .. 1:2 ~<'. ~.:. ::~ 2S :~, 2" :J'::;:' I 20 ! 1Q 'I!' L-. W I~ I~ "I,i IW u.. ::::1-, a:: . ~c.':' ' 1_ ~. :'>. :-- ~ '< '\ ::: 0(' . . ONYX ONYX DR N i< .. .. , ,,' ~ ~~!-: ~'r. &"".£:0 ~~. \- - E - e '" ~- .. .. " C-2 t.4^Rlf ST " :tJ! 1 .. / ~I ~ - -, .~ '" ..... 2";~" _. Z5 ~::3 . J.:"- " JERRELL ST I I \ " ~ .. I' J I : I I ! ..., .Ai Ì"--. 6 -.. I " " '.......... " C-1 PZ oj -00 Property Owner Information: Name of Property Owner: L I l" I ~~ \I. vJA~l t4 Zo 7hì~MIÞJÀ AJðÑt Id¿~ IJ;(ß Application for Site Plan Review City of Nor'j¡ Richland Hills 7301 N'=' Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 817·581·5515 Property Location: Street Address of Property: Legal Description of Property: (Please pm! all responses) Ji ¡ - 4 ?"~ t"ø ,.) ~~ , Phone No, ~1- 4!£·/777 Address of Property Owner: ÍðG( -#)(~J Zip: 76/ßð City: State: Applicant / Authorized Agent Information: "Note: An affidavit signed by the property owner is required when the agent is not the property owner" Name of Applicant I Authorized Agent: Phone No, Address: City: State: Zip: --- ...--- .--- .-. ---~. Type of Site Plan Review: Planned Development Specific Use Permit R-6-T Townhomes R-7-MF Multi-familly Required Documents: The following table contains a checklist of the minimum items required for Site Plan Review, Planned Development Special Use Permit --_._-- -~- Townhomes Multi·famlly 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. 1, P!ot Plan showing existing & planned structures, bldg. lines, boundaries, and easements, Topographic information with contours drawn at tIVO foot intervals, Elevation drawings of all buildings indicating the proposed exterior finish materials, 4, Landscaping, lighting, fencing, screemng, and wall. indicating all heights. Location of egress and ingress. Off-street parking and loading facilities, All pedestrian walks, malls, and coe,¡¡ ¡¡¡¡as, ------- R R -----------. -.- ------~- .----..---.- --._- - R R ___________u ________.____. R R R R ___________n'______ ______._.___________ ____ _ ____ R R R R -- _._--------------,-----_._-----~_.- "---~------- R R R R _.._--------~-+~----- -_..~ -----.--. R R -- --"--'--~~--,-~-----_.-- ---.-------. -.-- .- R R ---------- -_._-"-_._------~ ------~- Proposed land uses indicating ar~as in square feet. R R 4____ ___"_.____ ___ Location & types of signs, including lighting and heights with elevation drawings, R R Street names on proposed streets. R ----_._-------~-- Existing & proposed water. sewer. &. drainage systems: grading plan, R 12, Engineering drawings of all public improvements to be dedi~ated ~_the C!.tY:__,____. _ (Can be submitted at time of platting) 13, Utility and drainage easements &. location of solid waste disposal facillities. R 14, Additional items as required by tile City Council. R ----- --- '--- --- ------.--- Note: 'R" = Required R R 2, 3, --"-~---_... ----------------- -------- .- -- R R R R R R R R R R R R R Date: I certify that / am, or represent, the cö',rer of the properry descnbed abave and hereby submit this Site Plan 10 the City af NOrTh Rich/and ¡'iills far review ana aocravai. . __t· .J.. 2ðcD Your name (Printed Name): __-::::¡-;~__"...-_~tJ.l ß.~ I:: Signature: 4-u.oJ~.. ¡p CD· 419 (2 - 98) Site Plan Review Application 3 f);t!'.¿. __rr/~ ;... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planninç¡ & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 01/24/2000 Subject: Consider ReQuest of Skyline Norstar USA L.P.. for a Final Agenda Number: PS 99-37 Plat of Lot 2, Block 1, Silverado Addition. This Property is Located at Harwood Road and is the site for Phase /I of Silverado Apartments as approved under PD-25. Case Summary: Skyline Norstar has submitt~d, ª Final Plat of the Silverado Addition, Lot 2, Block 1. The proposed Final Plat is for 13.205 acres zoned PD-25 and approved for multi-family development. It is to be developed under the recently approved site plan for Phase II of the Silverado Apartments. The property is directly adjacent to single family residential properties (zoned R-3) to the west which front Colorado Boulevard. The applicant is providing a six-foot tall masonry screening wall and 15-foot wide landscaped buffer. Issues regarding drainage and waterline easements discussed in the Public Works memo dated January 3, 2000 have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. Recommendation: The Planning & Zoning Commission, at the January 13, 2000 meeting, recommended 7-0 to approve with the condition that the plat not be forwarded to City Council before it is corrected per the Public Works memo dated January 3, 2000. The corrections have since been made to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. To approve PS 99-37, Final Plat of Lot 2, Block 1, Silverado Addition as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaDle ~ Signature K;\Cases\PS Cases\PS 99-38-41 Final Pennington.dot Page 1 of2 24·;·;·;·;···:·;··················.·.·.·.1.1.· . ~ iftflll'll '-ï.T .t..:_............................... ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡~¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡I¡¡I?¡::::~: fl 21' '" 4. 2 '" fi' "" '-' " o ~ \Z,';: <» R-1 "" ,-'",D ~ ...., Jò '" '-' J" n <» - 0 ~;-;::: '" " ,..} ,. Q.. J6 .... , z c-. - .... Jô I .... ,~9 "" 4-(; "!:; '~ I- '-" ': "" "" '" ·u I ¡,; "" :;,; ...' ::t: i4 '-' '- " ~ .- p ...-.r;3 18 <. 20. 0, ,2J C·1 1332 u " § ~ \3 ;'4 -. 15 e 1A " R-7-MF 17 PS 99-37 LOT 2 BLOCK 1, SILVERADO ADDITION FINAL PLAT - SILVARADO APARTMENTS PHASE II OC 1863 ~-' Jt. ~7 R- jc a: r.1 I . :~ : '.4 I!~ l'"~ '-:; i £:E- 'G~'\Z .~ '::>_,-,~- -"1(J\), , ' :'~V:?--~\.O'-" \~ "". \:.-, \: ~ - h " -- ;; ,,~c\\ t'>\<-r' ' '}..t?-- ,~~\.. ' " - ~1>,'Ò'i~ 'N ::~ ;x> 15 .- Q EMERALD CIK ?E ~~ :'15 ::':: " -- ~~ , -1._ .......... ~ r ¡ '6 \i ~ ~\ ~\.~ <(þ ~, ~~ P D -27 2245 I ! ---- ---- --.--- ---------- -- ------f------ .- ~AC e ---.- ------ --- -- \)ÜpD-25 .") \o'Í.--'Þ?o. Gi,Ò. \2'219 't\ ¡>. \'>?o.~l'<L. ;:.íÞ HARWOOD ROAD I \ \j\'Þ~ "'we' C\o~¡>.?o. ,ø 26 .,\ ,::::1' " 1'\OR'ì'r\br'~C ~N\Y)\.-::- :,\i2.1b u ~£W6@'@I@¥" C-1 t '" r r;:owr. N ,.. I o c... ---~_._- --- - , '.) , 'J I ,-,:\'\ ,> 'THOUS^' . \" \:.t':' \-~ ",::\ ~~- ,., R-7-Mf OCT 14 '99 16:06 FR NORSTAR 972 831 0864 TO GLENN ENGINEER P.06/06 Ci!y of North Rlchland Hills 7301 N.E.1.aop 820 Nol1h RichIand HiHs, IX 76180 817-581 ·5515 Application Type: o Preliminary Plat Application for Subdivision Plat Approval NRH PIo¡oM IIIW"_, [2JFinal PIal o Aeplat OShort Form DAmended Plat Property Owner Information: Name of Property Owner. Tnx..±ee ¡;; Sys-l-emç.h.l601 T~PhoneNo. ~ J d..OO Sou.U, :rUpi±e~ Address of Property Owner: City: AvlaJ1.d State: IX. Zip: 1504~ Proposed Subdivision Name: 1..012. BlOt k I Sllver-a.do Ilddl'h'oh No. of Acres in Plat No. of lois in Plat I B.~()~ I Address: Authorized Agent Information: "Nole: An aHidavit signed by the property owner Is required when the agent is not the property owner. Name of Authorized Agent S ky lint ~O~L.!1S!LL. p. Phone No. Q11. -~-M.ro LR~Ußwb,V~ ~ý "*200 , State: -:N ]jp: YJ~ot03 City: City: Surveyor I Engin~ Information: Name of Firm: t:il€t\vt ¡::vt~; t1ffl'fJ1j Address: JOO l)edfY CoVy+ \ yVl\'\~ (! heYa[ V\ M· A YI}1 i · 0 , "R E. ~O!J?Oy a-h'ot1 Su'~e '260 Phone No. q7Z-711-tj/~ I Stale: -retQ.ç Zip: "'-¡~D(P2 Contact Person: Plat Fee Calculation: All PreUmlrøry Plats a. Applc.rion F,,: b. $1.50 p" rIJSÏdft/6<Jf tof or $5,00 pe, corr'ImfrQaf 't:le: TotafF'IJ: $120.00 Alf R.ptals, Shon Form Plats. .nd Ffll.' P~t:J a. AppDcafÍCtl F..: $120.00 b. S, .50 per re$Ïdsnliallot or $5.00 f)tr ccmmeråaJ ,t:trJ: c, $65.00 for tach sl1lel itl'rsøction: d. Cœnfy plat /iring lBØ.' An Am.nded Pili" a. Applicalíctl Fee: (none) b. COUIIfy plat m;¡g (".' $58.00 . To~/FH: $58.00 I.~o Total Fee: $58.00 . /'r1. S"O . AddiTion" filing IHS may be appIt:ablIJ for 0\18~ ()( IJIfTa ~ Time Waiver Request: (optional) The appDc.ant is 'WðI8lhal action on /his (Jlal may nOII,ke pface lor more than thirry (30) ctays ilnQ ~MlS alf tim. rsqunmlllts fo, apprwaf 01 the piaL Signa/ufØ: I certify /flaIl am.. or;'.,preSSf" /he owner ol/h, prøp,rry d9sa/bsd above and h.reby submit this subdivision pial to the City o( Nor1lr Ric1Ifilnd Hills for CitJt'lSidøflfÎOll. Dale: / Ò t.:l.1 / qq . Yournarne(pmIBdName): {!J.I£l.JJLy¡J M.ARIY1/'TD Sismtuff/: Subdivjsion Plat Application 4 ~~qq , ** TnTAI PAr,~_~~ ** .: " CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '---- Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 1/24/00 6,.1 2000-05 Agenda Number: Subject: Youth Advisory Committee Report on Status of Activities to Date In accordance with the Youth Advisory Committee's By-Laws, Section VI, the committee shall submit a report to the City Council on the status of its activities to date by January 31st of each year. The mid-year report of the Youth Advisory Committee as submitted by Tony Ortega, President of the Youth Advisory Committee, is attached for your review. Melissa Johnson, the City's Youth Outreach Coordinator and liaison to the committee, and Tony Ortega will be in attendance to present the report to the City Council and to provide a brief summary of the report. Recommendation Approve the Youth Advisory Committee's mid-year report to the City Council. ~. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available '-- fI<A/e~ k4;C:-, Department Head Signature Finance Director ~à~ Report of Youth Advisory Council 1999- 2000 To City Council of North Richland Hills The Youth Advisory Council is in its third year, The committee has faced a challenging year, with open arms to make it a year of success and excitement. Early in our term, we dealt with the issue of the goals and objectives of the committee to make the year successful. The development of the mission of the committee continues each meeting as we learn our true identity, Early in the summer, a goal that we agreed upon was youth unity in our community, This lead to our largest and most challenging project the Youth Advisory Committee has done, YAC. Party '99, Y A C in YAC. Party '99 stands for Youth Advisory Committee, This project took a lot of time of planning and preparation rrom our committee, The purpose of the YAC. Party '99 was for the committee to provide an night for teens to gather and have fun without any alcohol or drugs involved. YAC. Party '99 was held at Northfield Park on September II tho We had a company set up inflatable jump houses and another company set up a concession stand for food and rerreshments, We concluded the night with five high school bands, which competed in a contest we called the Battle of the Bands for a prize of one hundred dollars, We believe YAC. Party '99 was fun, exciting, and successful. We would like to thank Council member Mr. Trevino for donating the stage, Vicky Loftice for helping us arrange items in which we borrowed rrom park and recreation department, and the North Richland Hills Police department for providing safety during the event. Afterwards in later meetings, we discussed YAC. Party '99 and decided in the future to make a few changes to make it a more exciting and successful annual event. Unfortunately, during the planning of YAC. Party '99, we found out that our liaison Tina Harvey would be leaving us after the event. Our new liaison is Melissa Johnson and we are very excited to be working with her. We know with her leadership that she will continue to help our committee to be exciting and successful as she already has proved, In December, our committee participated in the Santa Cops program provided by our North Richland Hills Police Department by wrapping gifts, We also had a couple of volunteers help out a junior high dance. The dance is provided by the Parks and Recreation Department and we were glad to help them out. Currently, we are in the process of developing a survey, which we will give out to high school students, The purpose of the survey will be to find out teen's concerns, ideas, and wants within the city of North Richland Hills, After analyzing the survey's results, this will give our committee a better understanding of the ideas of teens in the city so that we can be the proper and successful voice of teens in the city, Issues rrom the survey may lead us into the action of talking with you the City Councilor us just providing the right information back out to the teens. Any way the analyzation of the survey may lead us, we believe it will give us a good understanding to our committee what we need to do, To make sure this survey is successful we are looking for outside help and working with City Manager Larry Cunningham to possibly getting help rrom a local college, We will keep you updated in any major circumstance throughout the survey and give you a final report, F or the future, the committee is looking into getting involved with other city boards and the possibility of setting up a web site, This last year has been fun and a great success, because of the hard work this committee has done, We hope only to build upon the success in to the next half of the term and be the voice and leaders for our teens of the community into the next century, - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS "- Department: Parks and Recreation Council Meeting Date: 1/24/00 GN 2000-06 Subject: Approve and Adopt The 2000 North Richland Hills Parks, Agenda Number: Recreation and Open Space Master Plan The current Comprehensive Parks and Recreation System Master Plan was adopted in 1991 and updated in 1995. Most of the needs identified in the 1991 and 1995 Master Plan updates have been successfully satisfied or addressed. In harmony with City Council Goal #5, Quality of Life Amenities for the Community, our consultant, Carter & Burgess, Inc., was selected to prepare a new Park System Master Plan for systematic planning and citizen involvement to take us into the 21st century and ultimate build-out of our community. The Park and Recreation Board and Park System Master Plan Executive Committee, at their January 17, 2000 joint meeting, reviewed the proposed final draft of the 2000 North Rich/and Hi/Is Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan. Preparation of the Plan was approached in two phases. The first phase included preparation of an inventory/supply analysis, population analysis, standards analysis, and demand analysis and '- needs assessment (focus groups, town hall meeting and citizen survey). The second phase of work included preparation of a tabulation of the prioritized needs identified by the citizen survey, public meetings, youth surveys conducted in the schools (facilitated by the Youth Advisory Committee), Park Board, Park System Master Plan Executive Committee, and staff. A summary of priority needs showing the high, moderate, and low ran kings of these needs was developed (pages 102-103). An action plan, identifying a program for park acquisition, development and a 5-year expenditure analysis was drafted from the summary of prioritized needs (pages 131-141). Highlights of the findings of the assessed needs include identification of the top ten needs as follows: · Playgrounds and Play Equipment · Picnic Shelters and Tables . Hike/BikelWalk Trails · Additional Recreation Center · Indoor Pool/Aquatic Center . Lakes · Nature Center · Natural Areas · Open Spaces · Off-road Bike Trails Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available '-'~L 011 ' Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION FINne" DlNClcW Page 1 of 2. .' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILL$ Highlights, included in the attached Executive Summary, of the high priorities from the overall recommendations include: · Provide playgrounds, play equipment, picnic shelters and tables within new parks created to serve areas of the city that are not served with neighborhood park services. · Continue to develop hike/bike/walk trails and linkages in accordance with the 1993 Citywide Trail System Master Plan. · Develop the proposed Town Center Recreation Center as the first additional recreation center. Plan to maintain recreation center services south of Loop 820, and continue land reservation at Cross Timbers Park or other new property for a third future additional recreation center. · Develop an indoor pool/aquatic center. The proposed Town Center Recreation Center would provide optimal opportunity to incorporate indoor pool amenities. · Provide lakes at new Community Parks where feasible. Continue with the next phase of development of Cross Timbers Park which includes a lake, and the Town Center Park which includes a series of lakes. · Provide a nature center, with a' potential location at Cross Timbers Park, Little Bear Creek Park, Fossil Creek Park, or newly acquired property. · Preserve natural areas along creek corridors and within existing parks and provide open space opportunities through new parkland acquisition. · Acquire and develop land for Neighborhood Parks and Community Parks to serve areas of the city that are not provided with these facilities. · Develop off-road bike trails along drainage corridors such as Little Bear Creek Park. The 2000 North Richland Hills Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan provides recommendations for future land acquisition, park expansion and park development to serve our growing population and needs. These recommendations are intended to provide a framework for fiscal planning for park expansion, renovation and new park and recreation facility development. The Park and Recreation Board and the Park System Master Plan Executive Committee reviewed the final draft of the 2000 North Richland Hills Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, and after considerable discussion, voted unanimously to recommend forwarding the Plan to the City Council for consideration and approval. Recommendation: To approve and adopt the 2000 North Richland Hills Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan as recommended by the Park and Recreation Board and the Park System Master Plan Executive Committee. Page 2 of 2 COMPREHENSIVE PARKS, RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN Executive Summary City of North Richland Hills, Texas January 2000 N@RTH R.ICH LAND HILLS Prepared By: - Carter II Burgess CARTER & BURGESS, INC. 3880 Hulen Street Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Market Research By: National Service Research Copyright 2000 by Carter & Burgess, Inc, I. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN The purpose of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, as stated in the request for proposal, is to provide the foundation for systematic planning and development of the City's park system into the 21 st Century. A primary goal of the plan is to provide recommendations, which are citizen driven through an extensive public input process. To accomplish this objective, a needs assessment survey to obtain public input about parks, services and recreation programs is included. The survey input serves as a basis for many of the recommendations herein. Other stated goals are as follows: . Develop a systematic and prioritized program for addressing documented needs including land acquisition, natural preservation areas, park development, maintenance and operations. . Develop implementation strategies and guidelines to include coordination with other planning documents, preparation of new ordinances and policies, and funding needs and potential sources. __ì:..J $ ..!~~~_..t:i..__ RICH L,."NC) H I (, L S January 2000 Executive Summary 1 2000 North Richland Hílls Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan _ Ca.....·Burgess SUMMARY OF PRIORITY ITEMS North Richland Hills Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan November 1, 1999 Playgrounds/play equipment Picnic shelters/tables Hike/bike/walk trail Additional recreation center Indoor pool/aquatic center Lakes Nature center Natural areas Open spaces Off-road bike trail Outdoor swimming Benches/seating area Arboretum More parks in my neighborhood Practice baseball fields Sand volleyball courts Lighted soccer fields Skateboard park Outdoor basketball courts Indoor in-line hockey Landscape/irrigation in parks Lighted softball fields Lighted baseball fields Amphitheater Decorative fountains Practice soccer fields Practice softball fields Equestrian Trails High Moderate Low · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · N@RTlf KIC¡'--ILAND H I L, L S 2 January 2000 Executive Summary 2000 Norlh Rich/and Hílls Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan _ CarIw- Burg... _..."..".,.~..,~~___~____..__.__.___,_,___.__",..'m__'_"~.._______n...·~'__"_"~""_'^'_ .._._ -''_ ... .~. -,_ ,- .-..___..___ SUMMARY OF PRIORITY ITEMS North Richland Hills Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan November 1, 1999 Unlighted soccer fields Practice football fields Outdoor in-line hockey Indoor volleyball courts Sculpture/art in parks Lighted football fields Tennis courts Unlighted baseball fields Unlighted softball fields Unlighted football fields High Moderate Low · · · · · · · · · · __.N ~)_r, I _~_ RICl"'1 Lr" N D H ILL S January 2000 Executive Summary 3 2000 North Rich/and Hills Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan _ Carter-Burgess CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS - OVERALL RECOMMENDA TIONS 1. HIGH PRIORITIES 1. Provide new playgrounds and play equipment within newly developed parks created for underserved areas. Upgrade playground facilities and playground equipment during redevelopment of Northfield Park and Fossil Creek Park. Provide surfacing that meets current safety and accessibility standards, and recreation opportunities for various age groups and child development skills. Provide access to additional existing and proposed playground facilities and playground equipment through joint-use agreements with the local independent school districts at Foster Village Elementary School, Snow Heights Elementary School, Holiday Heights Elementary School, Smithfield Elementary School, and Smithfield Middle School sites. Playgrounds are provided at Cross Timbers Park, Mullendore Playground, Fossil Creek Park, Green Valley Community Park, Linda Spurlock Park, Norich Park, Northfield Park, NRH20 Family Water Park, Richfield Park, Richland Tennis Center, Thornbridge Park, and Walker's Creek Park. 2. Provide picnic shelters and tables in existing neighborhood parks, community parks and special use areas. Areas should be naturally shaded and provide for handicap access. Confirm/Develop an agreement with Birdville I.S.D. to ensure after school access to existing and proposed outdoor facilities at the Foster Village Elementary School, Snow Heights Elementary School, Holiday Heights Elementary School, Mullendore Elementary School, Smithfield Elementary School, and Smithfield Middle School sites. Develop neighborhood park amenities to provide a playground with benches and picnic shelter and tables adjacent to or on School Property allowing for full-time access to picnic shelter and tables and city-provided amenities, and after school access to School outdoor facilities such as basketball courts, playground, back stops and open space. The written Joint- Use Agreement detailing maintenance, access and other issues will need to be expanded to provide enhanced City neighborhood park amenities installed on School District property. Picnic shelters and tables are provided at Cross Timbers Park, Fossil Creek Park, Green Valley Community Park, Linda Spurlock Park, NRH20 Family Water Park, Norich Park, Northfield Park, Richfield Park, Thornbridge Park and Walker's Creek Park. January 2000 Executive Summary N(of.)KT'H 1',1 ('1-; L,'" N C) H 1 L L S 4 2000 North Rich/and Hills Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan C'-íC Carter· Burgess 3. Continue to develop hike/bike/walk trail linkages to provide safe, off-street pedestrian and bicycle connections to existing and new parks, as well as economic, municipal and recreation destinations. Place high priority on the preservation and conservation of existing drainage corridors such as Little Bear Creek and Fossil Creek. Provide hike/bike/walk trails of a minimum %-mile each at Northfield Park and Richfield Park and for new park development. Include accessible connections to park elements such as playgrounds and pavilions. If parks are large enough, construct loop trails through the park for multi-purpose users. Consideration of previous planning efforts, such as the "1993 City of North Richland Hills Trail System Master Plan," should be taken into account for all future trail projects. Many of the trails master planned in this document are currently in the planning and design stages, while the trails at the Bedford-Euless Road Greenway and the North Electric Trail have been constructed. Continue to acquire and develop hike/bike/walk trails along creek corridors and master planned Trail System. Add playground, picnic shelter and tables, and parking at Trail Heads for trails being developed in areas where these services do not exist. Bedford-Euless Road Greenway, Cross Timbers Park, Fossil Creek Park, Green Valley Community Park, Holiday Lane Athletic Fields, Linda Spurlock Park, North Electric Trail, Thornbridge Park and Walker's Creek Park have trails of varying lengths within the parks. 4. Develop the proposed Town Center Recreation Center as the first additional recreation center. The North Richland Hills Recreation Center is the only existing recreation center in the City, and given the implications of the possible Loop 820 expansion, plan to maintain recreation center services south of Loop 820. Continue development and land reservation at Cross Timbers Park, or acquire new property to develop a third future additional recreation center. 5. Develop an indoor pool/aquatic center in the City of North Richland Hills. The proposed Town Center Recreation Center would provide the optimal opportunity to incorporate indoor pool/aquatic center amenities, or acquire new property to include Recreation Center, and indoor pool/aquatic center. 6. Provide lakes at new Community Parks where feasible. Lakes are provided at Green Valley Community Park, Linda Spurlock Park and Walker's Creek Park. Plans for Cross Timbers Park include lakes in the next phase and a series of lakes are proposed at Town Center Park. January 2000 Executive Summary N(f)KT II F, I l.,' 1'1 L ,., N [) ---- II I L I. ~,3 5 2000 North Richland Hills Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan C'-Æ Carter· Burgess 7. Provide a nature center within the City of North Richland Hills. Potential locations for nature center on existing park property: Cross Timbers Park, Little Bear Creek Park, Fossil Creek Park or acquire new property to include nature center. 8. Provide for natural areas along creek corridors and greenways such as Little Bear Creek and Fossil Creek. Preserve natural areas within existing parks such as Walker's Creek Park. As new development occurs, careful consideration should be given as to how residents and pedestrians will access these areas. Future residential streets should be located adjacent to greenways where appropriate, or easements should be developed to allow access for pedestrians. Additional land acquisitions may also be necessary to ensure a continuous recreational system. Consideration should be given during land acquisition and development to previous planning efforts including the "Development Guide for Little Bear Creek Corridor," and the "Little Bear Creek Floodplain Management Ordinance". 9. Provide open space opportunities through new parkland acquisitions. Preserve existing open space where possible at Cross Timbers Park, Fossil Creek Park and along existing creek corridors. Acquire and develop approximately 23-82 acres of Neighborhood Park Land in the underserved areas (see maps, pages 72 and 141). Acquire and develop approximately 45 to 223 acres of Community Park Land. Parkland should be acquired either adjacent to existing Community Parks if available to further expand existing parks (ie. adjacent to Northfield Park) and/or acquired at new sites in the underserved areas of the City (see maps, pages 73 and 141). 10. Develop off-road bike trails along drainage corridors and natural areas such as Little Bear Creek. Develop trail to link Little Bear Creek Park, Thornbridge Park, Green Valley Park, Open Space to North Tarrant Parkway, Cotton Belt Trail and Cross Timbers Park. Include off-road bike trail linkages with community parks, natural areas and open space within the park system. Consult the "1993 City of North Richland Hills Trail System Master Plan." January 2000 Executive Summary 6 2000 North Richland Hills Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan -= Carter· Burg... W Ü ~ Cf'J Z W a.. o Q Z « Z o ~ W a:: ü W a:: Cf'J ~ a:: « a.. W > Cf'J Z W I W a:: a.. :::;E o ü ZCf'J «-J -J-J a..- I ZQ Oz I-«Z ü-J «I« a::ü-J «a::a.. WIfE >;-1-1- Wa::Cf'J >0« u.z:::;E Cf'J -J -J I Q Z « -J I ü a:: I I- a:: o z u. o ç ü (1)"0 00(1) 0"0 I-C: ... (I) ctlo. (I) x >-w (I) 0) c: ctI a:: - en o U "0 (I) iñ ctI o ~ o u. (I) êã E :¡:; en W - (I) C) "0 ::J 00 c: o :¡:; ctI o o ....J (I) :õ ëi5 en o a. c: ctI ä: c: .Q ê3 « ~ c: ctI a:: o o o ci It) ..... (") ~ o o C!- o o ..... Ñ ~ o o C!- o It) ..... ~ I o o o ci o ..... ~ It) I ..... f!? ctI ~ J . J I o I Z <J; f-o « .J .J , ! I:......¡ _ !ÐI- Z U I -¡ ;::::j - en ctI ~ ctI "0 c: ::J e 0) >. ctI ã. ..... N - ,.... ~ ro E oE o :J o(f) N Q) ~~ ro ::J :J 0 C Q) ro x ...,w c: .S! a.: (I) o ctI c% c: Cb 8- 't:¡ c: ctI c: ~ ctI e o æ ~ >;; œ ~ ~ 't:¡ c: .$! .c: o ~ :ê ~ o o o C\ ~en.c -J:: . ...(1)0 000. ~ ro ::: (f)' !2 (f) e ...a.(f) . E ...... ctI"O-oE~ °E·a. ~a.OO(l)W '~(I).c ...~OJ::- ·E""-o ~ a.ctI ;f::' J:: 0 W !l E (I) 'ë W (f) ... c: Cs(f)enJ:: (1)-"0(1) ~ -r. E:J .c ~ :E .2J ü:i W ~ 0) ~ "" J::"'O)(I) (I) ctla. 32 ~ E .2J (I) ëj) J: 32 Cs 32 == 0 (l)U 0 (I).!!.1J: ....(1)"0 (I»ø 10:: UZ-' .....10:: 10::... J::= ~ctlJ::æJ::(I)ä; tg¡~~"Eo~:::=:::¡;¡"O o 0 (I) (I) 'õ C 0 E :J E 0 C ZU.ZZ...,(f)J:(f)~(J)u.::J Cf'J :::;E W I- >- I- a:: o a: a.. I <.9 I >. ctI ä: - en "0_ C c: ::J (I) e E 0)0. >"- ctI ::J _ c- a.w ..... W ü « a.. Cf'J Z W a.. o c Z « Z o I- « W a:: ü W a:: Cf'J ~ a:: « a.. W > Cf'J Z W I W a:: a.. ~ o ü ZCf'J «....J ....J....J 0..- I Zc Oz I-«Z ü....Jc:( «I..J a::üo.. «a:: a:: WIW >;-1-1- Wa::Cf'J >0« LL.Z~ Cf'J ....J ....J I C Z « ....J I ü a:: I I- a:: o Z LL. o ~ ü C ro ë: C .Q Õ « ,:,¿, C ro a:: a.> "0 IDa.> 0"0 t-C ... a.> roo. a.> x >-w 1.0 .... f!? ro a.> >- a.> C) C ro a:: - en a.> ... ::J - ° 2 - en - C .Q 'S; ro a. o .... - - en :'!::: C ::J a.> :c ro - o C\I - o o q o .... c-q, .... ER- - en ° U "0 a.> - en ro ° ~ ° I..L o o o ci ;j!) ER- .æ ro E ; en W - a.> C) "0 ::J ID ~8 ::JO -. 0 01.0 0 ::JC\I "0 ....... en_ éi5~ :'!:::('I') -0 CER- SO ~ò =0 a.>o 'S; ci :c q ro 1.0 ro C\I a.ER- t-ER- C ° ; ro ° ° ...J a.> :c ïii en ° a. ~en"; _0'" ~a.>õ ....¿ ,:,¿,~ro:'!:::CIJ' 0CIJoO ...~a.CIJ . E ~... roro"O-Ea.> °Ëa. a.a.08a.>w .~a.>'¿ ~Þ,g~w en E· E-w ° a.>·ë"'o - a.>"O CIJ "'::J oCIJ.!!3'É>a.>w:2 a.> "0 U E :ê êi5 'É>'Q) w a.> ::E ~ a.a.> èã E .QJ Q) .- J: :2 L.. :2 == 0 a.> ° a.> en a.> a.>0a.»- ID U Z ~ J: ~t;::: -g t;::: ... ~ _~"O~a.>~a.>a.> ~~~co=:'!:::=:'!:::iii"O ±:a.>a.>·õcoE~Eoc ...JZZ""")ClJJ:CIJ...:;ClJI..L~ en a.> :c ro ~ ... ° a.> ï:: :!:: ° a.> ,- ~ a.CIJ C\I r. ... rZ£/¡ f-o <..I "..1-' @r- zur I . I " I ::::: ex) ~ ro E o E o ::J oCIJ C\I a.> ~~ ro :::J :::J ° c: a.> ro x ....,w c: ~ a.: CD (.) (t c% c: CD 8- "tJ c: (t c: ~ (t ~ (.) & ~. L;; ~ .£2 ~ "tJ c: ~ .t:: .(.) Q: :E :ê c c c C\ w Ü < Cl.. (J) Z W Cl.. o o Z < Z o ~ < w ~ Ü w ~ (J) ~ ~ < Cl.. W > (J) Z w :r: w a:: Cl.. ~ o ü Z(J) :5::j Cl..- :r: Zo Oz ~<z Ü-l< <:r:-I a::üCl.. < a:: a:: w:r:w >;-~~ wa::(J) >0< LLZ~ (J) -I -I :r: o Z :5 :r: ü a:: :r: ~ a:: o Z LL o >- ~ ü c: ro ã: c: o ~ ~ c: ro 0::: Q)-o aJQ) 0'0 ~c: .... Q) roo. Q) X >-W Q) C) c: ro a::: ..... ..... Ul 0) a) ~ o ..... ~ - I/) o Ü '0 Q) - I/) ro (,) Q) .... o u.. ..... ..... I'-;. ~ o Ul o ..... ~ Q) - ro E :¡:; I/) W C> c: 'S; ro 0. c: o ë.c: ~Õ¡ c: c: Q)~ 0. _ Q).c: '015 ~ .~ Q) - 1::: 8- ~~ - Q) C) '0 :J aJ LO ..... ~ ro Q) >- ..... N ~ ~ ~Uì :E ~ ü .ê' <i.a.. W '0 ~ Q) ~-g ..... :J ..... u.. ~ ..... o 0) as ~ - ët¡ .... - - o .E .... ro Q) § .... Q) 0. LO ~ ~ I o ~ Q) ~ (,) c: o (,) Q) C> ro .... Q) > ro Ò ..... c: o :¡:; ro (,) o ....J Q) 15 ëñ I/) o a.. I/) ~ ~.. :;; I/) Q) - ,.. ~ ~ ët¡!..!.. = a...... ü .= !.. 'æ r:. .~ ~ '8 ~ .c: ~ .~ .= ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ..::.::: (.) ~ Q) J- = I- ..::.::: "'C .r. £:" ro~æ ~~(,)~.~~ê 5§ a..rom ~üE .b....c:E'OE a.. .. ~""(,)$~ü~Q)"6>E :2 ~ >. - Q) ro Q) = - I/) a.. _ ._ Q) .::: ro '-.0 Q) - J: W - I/) Q) 0 ~ Q) == ~ C:aJw æ æ >'Zü €~,g~ß~€€:§~ëñ(l)==== o .~ ro 0 :t:: 0 0 0 ~ ~ Q) Q) ZO:::U ü::JZZ(I);>oo::: ZZ ~ ro ~ Q) ~ fËl/) Q)= ~ro ,- .... J:I- C') <i: WI/) ~ë:) - Q) O·~ «e :Eo. ü~ -'0 «c: w2 ~ (I)..... -N .. LO I . j I ..... o I Z (j'j ~<..J ~..J..J @I- ZUI I/) .... ro ~ .. c: ~ 'E o N ~ c: == o .... ~ Q) - .... c: .EQ) C>Ü .E c: 'O.Q §ëO u.. ~ (,) u.. Q) -=0::: ¡...: .... ~.!! ro c: E~ .¡::: a.. .. ~ .. c: ~ 'E LO ..... ~ - I/) o (,) Q) I/) ro Q) .... (,) .!: '0 '3 o (,) .... Q) - c: Q) (,) Q) c: o ro '0 c: ro - I/) ro I/) ro .... Q) ~ ë ~ 0 Q) N ü ~a) c: 'ë: 0. == ~ g ~ E....J Q) o Õ :S Ü.c: == '5 Q) 0 Z (I) c:: ~ a.: Q) to) (1 ~ c:: Q) 8- 'tJ c:: (1 c:: ~ (1 ~ to) Q) Q:: (/j ~ æ ~ :f 'tJ c:: ..!!! .c: to) ã: =ê ~ o o o C\ 0> c: ~ 'E LO ~ ~ .... ro a.. .... .!! c: Q) ü c: ~ E .g Q) ~ ro 0. Q) I/) C> c: 'i5.. o ã> > Q) '0 .... o C> c: ëñ ro .c: a.. .. ~ ro E o E o :J 0(1) NQ) ~~ ro :J :J to) c: Q) ro x ..,w .... Q) - c: Q) Ü c: ro .Q c:- o ro .- Q) ~I... '0 (,) '0 Q) «0::: ~ w Ü « a.. en z w a.. o £:) z « z o ~ « w e::: Ü w e::: en ~ e::: « a.. w > en z w :r: w e::: a.. ::::ïE o Ü Zen :5::1 a..- :r: z£:) Oz ~«z Ü....J« «:r:....J e:::üa.. «e:::e::: w:r:w >;-~~ we:::en >0« u.z::::ïE en ....J ....J :r: £:) z :5 :r: ü e::: :r: ~ e::: o z u. o ç ü c: .Q ro (,) o ....J a> ::õ ïñ I/) o a.. c: ro ä: c: o :¡::: (,) « ~ c: ro a:: a>\j ma> o\j I- c: .... a> roQ. a> X >-W LO ..... ~ ro a> >- a> C) c: ro a:: C) c: :a c: ::I "c: u.. ~ u.: 'Ë t-= <D ~ (,<)- .¡: ro E ï:: a.. " - I/) o U \j a> - I/) ro (,) a> .... o u.. a> - ro E :¡::: I/) w - a> C) \j ::I m " c: ~ 'Ë <D (,<)- ~ .... ro a.. .... a> - c: a> U c: ~ (,) :¡::: ro ::I g ë5 o a.. .... .... o a> 0- \jC: c: Q) _U LO LO ..... I/) .... ro a> >- ~ z .... o a>.c: ~c. c: a> O\j -\j c: c: a> ro -g a> . a> .!::! £ Q.I/)a> a> ui . \jc:æ I 0 c: I/) .- .- a>=:- .- \j <ü ....c:~ ro 0 ro >(,)- I/) ~ .... ~ ro roo.. o...?;- I/) .- .... c: a> ::I .oE ,§ E I- 0 I/)U I/) :: e a> uz I/) a> ~ ro ....J <D '<:t ('t) ~ ro a> >- c: ~ 'Ë ..... (,<)- c: I/) o a> ...., :.¡:; c:= a> ë3 \jro c:u.. a>_ Q.ro a> .... \j.a I (,) 1/)2 a> .- .¡: -£ ro .... >« ~~ .... .... ~roro ¡¡;c..c.. o..~.?;- I/) a> .- .... ~ c: a> U ::I -g....E ._ ro E I-Q)O I/)mu I/) a> :: e E a> U:.Jz .... a> 'E a> U a> .... ::I ro z ,.... LO ..... I/) .... ro a> >- ~ z - I/) o (,) a> I/) ro a> .... (,) .!;;; \j '3 o (,) .... Q) 'E a> (,) a> c: o (ij \j c: ro - I/) ro I/) I/) 5 ~~ ro \j I/) .... ro .... .¡: ~ ro a.. 2 5....0...-= c: uro\jc:'ro a> a.. 0·- 1-.... U ~ 00 a> .?;- .c: .- \j c: ~'§5~~ :: UE.o-C:E ~ .... .c: ro ro ro E .Q) a> ä: 2 a> Q)oQ)è:,-UJ= muza>a>~ E ~~~~~ .g :.Jzzo..::E a> .... ::I - (,) ::I .... c:0 o ~ -.... c: c: a> .- \jc) c: c: a> .- Q.C: a> 0 \jN Ie: I/) 0 a>:¡::: .¡: ro . ro (,) (,) >..Q(¡) I/) ro a> <'i: (ij .... ::I - ro Z co G J . j I 12ifJ . <:' , ~ ,-' c.. ....; _ @ II- Z ~II ¡¿, o ..... a> "ê ro Q. Q) I/) C) c: 'ã. o ã3 > Q) \j .... o C) c: ïñ ro .c: c.. " c:: ~ a.: Q) (,) «:J ~ c:: Q) 8- 't) c:: «:J c:: ~ «:J ~ u Q) a::: (1)" ~ ~ .!:2 :I: 't) c:: ..!!:! .r:: .u Ii: =ê ~ c c c C\ ~ ro E o E o ::J oCl) N Q) ~~ ro ::I ::J (,) c: Q) ctI X -,w W Ü ~ 00 Z W a.. o Q Z « Z o I- « W a:: ü W a:: 00 ~ a:: ~ W > 00 Z W J: W a:: a.. ~ o ü Zoo «...J ...J...J a..- J: ZQ Oz I-«Z ü...J« «J:...J a::üa.. «a:: a:: WJ:W >;-1-1- Wa::oo >0« Ü:Z~ 00 ...J ...J J: Q Z :5 J: ü a:: J: I- a:: o Z u.. o ç ü c: .Q ro (.) o ...J Q) :ë ëi> C/) o a.. c: ro ã: c: .Q 1:5 « ~ c: ro a::: Q)'O IX) Q) 0'0 I- c: ... Q) ro a. Q) >< >-W LO ..... ~ ro ~ Q) C» c: ro a::: êñ o U '0 Q) - C/) ~ ~ o u. ~ Z Q) - ro E :¡:¡ C/) w ~ :::J - (.) :::J ... c:êñ o ~ - ..- c: .S; Q) . '001 c: c: Q) .- a.C: Q) 0 'ON or:: C/) 0 Q):¡:¡ .- ro ... (.) . roo£ >-Q) - Q) 01 '0 :::J IX) C/) s ~~ ~ '0 "'ro Q) .- C/) ro a.. Q)... ::: ~ a.. o ro '0 01 U U a.. 0 .S; .c: ~ oêñ (.) Q) ~ .c: .- æ ~§SJj "'SUE.o- IX) '0'" .c: ro >..¡:: ro E .2> Q) ~8Æ8~~ ..Q ~::::C/) ro =::Q)Q)~ U :::¡zza.. C/) Q) (.) ro a. (J) c: Q) a. o 0) C/) ~ ~... ... ro roa.. a..c: ~ Q) Q) Q) ~~ UQ) ....0 ro C/) Q) Q) IX) 01 Q) ro -~ =:: c: :::¡:::¡ ë¡¡ ... I- Q) ~ ã5 '0 ro o a::: :t= o o ..... (\') J . j I C\I C/) ... ro ~ o tZtJì ¡... <:..J .1 , ' c.. __ _ @ II- Z ¡ ¡IT \.1 .... ~ o o CX!. CO ..... ..... W o CO C"l (\') CO W - o .E ... ro Q) :É ... Q) a. LO ..... W ~'O :::c: E ro = Q) . 01 C)ro c: c: .¡:: 01 ro .- Q) C/) Ür::- =00 m:;:; '- .:=~'E C/) .- 0 Q) = (.) E.oc: .so ~ C/) 'ëi) C/) = 0 ro 0 ... _C/)Q) c:: .,!!! a.: Q) u (t ~ c:: Q) 8- 't] c:: (t c:: ~ (t ~ U ~ .ri >;; æ ~ ::::: ::r: 't] ~ '5 Q: :ê ~ c c c C\ ..... ..... C\I ..... W ~ (t E o E o :::J 0(1) N Q) ~£ Ct1 :::J :::J U c: Q) Ct1 >< -,w CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '- Department: Public Works/PlanninQ/BuildinQ Inspections Council Meeting Date: 1/24/00 Subject: Approve Development and Inspection User Fees- Ordinance No. 2451 Agenda Number: GN 2000-07 The Building Inspections, Planning, and Public Works Departments have coordinated on revising their user fees and combining them into one ordinance. Each department has reviewed the DMG Maximus Study and discussed fee changes with the Finance Director and Assistant City Manager. The revisions will be presented during the Pre Council session. Recommendation: To approve Ordinance No. 2451. "-- Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaDle , ~ r:1&-"'I I~ Finance Director ~!~ Page 1 of L ORDINANCE NO. 2451 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR A DEVELOPMENT FEE STRUCTURE; PROVIDING FOR BUILDING PERMIT FEES; PROVIDING FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES; PROVIDING FOR MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES; PROVIDING FOR PLUMBING PERMIT FEES; PROVIDING FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT RELATED PERMIT FEES; PROVIDING FOR PLATTING AND ZONING FEES; PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT FEES; AMENDING ORDINANCES #1813, #1927, #2026, #1781, #1658 AND #381 BY DELETING EXISTING FEES ANDIOR FEE TABLES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED ($200.00) DOLLARS FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Development fees required For each permit and or application required by the development codes of the City of North Richland Hills involving the platting, zoning, construction of public infrastructure and/or the construction of private improvements, the applicant shall pay any and all application fees, permit fees, investigation fees, inspection fees and plan review fees as indicated in the fee schedules in Table 1 through Table 7. Building Permit Fees: 1. All classes of construction (new, addition, remodel, alteration, etc.) shall pay a building permit fee that is assessed based on the valuation of the project. The fee shall be based on "Table 1 - Building Permit Fees." The building valuation may be established using the most recent "Building Valuation Data" as published in the Building Standards Magazine as published by the International Conference of Building Officials or may be established as submitted by the permit applicant. The valuation of construction shall include the fair market value of the work described on the application and shall include architectural, structural, electrical, plumbing and mechanical work. Except as specifically referenced in "Table 2 - Miscellaneous Permit Fees," the building permit fee shall be based on valuation. 2. All associated trade permits shall be assessed based on the associated fee table. 3. All commercial and multi-family building permits on which the permit fee is based on valuation shall be assessed a plan review fee. The plan review fee shall be sixty-five (65) percent of the building permit fee unless otherwise specifically stated. 4. Permit fees for work commenced without a permit may be doubled. 5. Reinspection fees may be assessed for inspections requested when work is not ready, Ordinance No. 2451 Page 1 of 14 when the work is not accessible for inspection, when previously identified code violations are not corrected, when repeated violations are made by the same contractor on repeated jobs and/or as may deemed appropriate by the building official. The first reinspection fee shall be assessed at $30.00. The second reinspection fee for items not corrected from the first reinspection fee shall be assessed at $60.00. the third and each subsequent reinspection fee for items not corrected from previous reinspection fees shall be assessed at $100.00. TABLE 1 - BUILDING PERMIT FEES Total Valuation Fee $1.00 to $500.00 $22.00 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $22.00 for the first $500.00 plus $2.75 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $63.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $12.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $352.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus $9.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $580.00 for the first $50,000.00 plus $6.25 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $895.00 for the first $100,000.00 plus $5.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $2,855.00 for the first $500,000.00 plus $4.25 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $4,955.00 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.75 for each additional $1,000,000.00, or fraction thereof Ordinance No, 2451 Page 2 of 14 TABLE 2, MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING PERMIT FEES Item 1. Certificate of Occupancy Application Fee a. Change of Business Owner/Business Name b. Change of Occupant/New Tenant c. New Building, Addition, Tenant Finish Out 2. Residential temporary accessory building (less than 200 sq. ft) 3. Residential permanent accessory building 4. Fences (wood, chain link, vinyl (per lot or tract) 5. Fences (masonry-per lot or tract) 6. Fences (wrought iron-per lot or tract) 7. Fences (masonry screening wall) 8. Fences (subdivision walls) 9. Swimming pool, in ground 10. Swimming pool, above ground 11. Portable (self-contained) spa/hot tub 12. Retaining walls (more than 4 feet in height) 13. Satellite dish (more than 36 inches in diameter) 14. Carports 15. Deck/patio, without cover 16. Deck/patio, with cover 17. Demolition (per building) 18. Tent (30 day permit) 19. Carnival (approved by City Council) 20. Residential garage sale 21. Temporary construction/sales trailer 22. Grading, Excavation and Fill 23. Revised Grading Plan (per platted SF lot) 24. Revised Grading Plan (per acre or tract)1 25. Change To Approved Plans (minimum of one hour) 26. Change Contractor of Record 1For plans not submitted with plat application. Paving/Concrete (for projects not included with a building permit) 1. 2. 3. 4. Drive approach, new or replacement (ROW-per approach) Driveway, new or replacement (residential-private property) Sidewalk, new or replacement (within ROW) Commercial parking lot (adding surface area or change in grading patterns) Ordinance No, 2451 Page 3 of 14 Fee $ 30.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 15.00 valuation $ 15.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 valuation valuation $175.00 $100.00 $ 50.00 $ 30.00 $ 15.00 valuation $ 15.00 valuation $ 75.00 $ 30.00 $200.00 $ 5.00 $ 50.00 $ 75.00 $100.00 $250.00 $ 50.00/hour $ 25.00 $25.00 $15.00 $25.00 valuation Signs Permit Fees 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Permanent, 1 to 50 square feet in area Permanent, 51 to 100 square feet in area Permanent, 101 to 200 square feet in area Permanent, 201 to 300 square feet in area Permanent, 301 square feet and over (per square foot) Portable sign Banner sign Weekend advertising registration (per year) $50.00 $100.00 $200.00 $300.00 $1.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 Miscellaneous Fees 1. Contractor's Registration 2. Board of Appeals Filing Fee 3. Master Electrician's License (Annual Fee) 4. Master Sign Electrician's License (Annual Fee) 5. Journeyman Electrician's License (Annual Fee) 6. Journeyman Sign Electrician's License (Annual Fee) 7, Residential Wireman Electrician's License (Annual Fee) 8. Maintenance Electrician's License (Annual Fee) 9. Reciprocal Letter $ 75.00 $100.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 15.00 $ 15.00 $ 15.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 TABLE 3 - MECHANICAL FEES MONETARY VALUE OF PROPOSED WORK BASE + MULTIPLIER OF MONETARY VALUE $ 30.00 35.00 40.00 00.00 + .009 100.00 + .008 200.00 + .006 700.00 + .004 $ 0.00- 1,501 - 3,001 - 5,001 - 50,001- 100,001 - 500,001 - 1,500 3,000 5,000 50,000 100,000 500,000 or more TABLE 4 - PLUMBING FEES 1. New Residential/Multi-family/Hotels/Motels - Single family and multi-family residents, hotels and motels shall be calculated as follows: $50.00 for the first water closet, plus $25.00 dollars for each additional water closet Ordinance No, 2451 Page 4 of 14 2. Residential/Multi-family/Hotels/Motels Remodel/Repair - Single family and multi- family residents, hotels and motels shall be calculated as follows: $30.00 for each bath or kitchen area per dwelling unit 3. New Eating Establishments - Restaurants, cafeterias, deli's, and similar type establishments shall be calculated according to the following fee schedule: Total Gross Square Footage of Building or Lease Space 5,000 square foot or less 5,001 square foot or more Permit &e .07 / sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet .06/ sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet 4. Remodel Eating Establishments - Restaurants, cafeterias, deli's, and similar type food establishments shall be calculated according to the following fee schedule: Total Gross Square Footage of Building or Lease Space 5,000 square foot or less 5,001 square foot or more Permit Fee .05/ sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet .04 / sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet 5. Commercial Structures - New, addition, remodel, repair or tenant finish out an existing retail, commercial or industrial structure shall be calculated according to the following fee schedule: Total Gross Square Footage of Building or Lease Space 5,000 square foot or less 5,001 - 25,000 square foot 25,001 - 50,000 square foot 50,001 square foot or more Permit &e $.025 / sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet $.015 / sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet $.0055/ sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet $.0035 / sq. ft. plus $30.00 per water closet 6. Miscellaneous Plumbing - Miscellaneous plumbing items shall be calculated according to the following schedule plus a $20.00 permit issuance fee shall be added to each miscellaneous permit: DESCRIPTION OF WORK Each plumbing fixture Each building sewer service Each septic system Each private storm sewer system Each hot water heater Each swimming pool P-trap Each construction trailer or mobile home service (water & sewer) PERMIT FEE $ 7.00 $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $15.00 Ordinance No, 2451 Page 5 of 14 Each propane tank installation Each water line Each temporary holding tank Each gas piping system one to five outlets Each gas piping system over five outlets, per outlet Repair or replacement of water piping or treating equipment, each fixture Repair or replacement of drainage, vent or sewer piping, each fixture Each water meter $10.00 $ 7.00 $10.00 $10.00 $ 1.50 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 $ 5.00 The following must be issued on separate permits: Each industrial waste interceptor (grease trap/sand trap) Each backflow prevention device $20.00 $10.00 TABLE 5 - ELECTRICAL FEES 1. New and additions to single family and multi family residential units: $15.00 base fee plus $.04 per square feet (air conditioned area) 2. Residential remodeling or repair where the benefit area can be determined: DESCRIPTION OF WORK/AREA PERMIT FEE 500 SF or less 501 - 5,000 SF 5001 SF or more $ 35.00 25.00 + .04 per sq. ft. 200.00 + .009 per sq. ft. 3. New, addition, remodeling, repairing, or tenant finish out of a retail, commercial or industrial structure: DESCRIPTION OF WORK/AREA PERMIT FEE 500 SF or less 501 - 5,000 SF 5001 - 100,000 SF 100,001 - 500,000 SF 500,001 SF or more $ 35.00 25.00 + .04 per sq. ft. 200.00 + .009 per sq. ft. 425.00 + .007 per sq. ft. 1,500.00 + .005 per sq. ft. Ordinance No, 2451 Page 6 of 14 4. New, addition, remodeling, repairing or shell warehouse or shell structure: DESCRIPTION OF WORK/AREA PERMIT FEE 5,000 SF or less 5,001 to 10,000 S F 10,001 to 20,000 SF 20,001 S.F. and over $ 50.00 + 0.008 S.F. 60.00 + 0.006 S.F. 80.00 + 0.004 S.F. 110.00 + 0.003 S.F. 5. Electrical work that does not have a definable square foot area or is not covered as a miscellaneous electrical item: DESCRIPTION OF WORK/AREA PERMIT FEE Replace, Add or move an outlet or receptacle (each) Replace, Add or move a branch circuit (each) (Minimum permit fee $12.50) 6. Miscellaneous electrical items: DESCRIPTION OF WORK Accessory Building Temporary Power Pole Mobile Home Connection Signs Construction Trailer 30 Day Temporary Service 90 Day Temporary Service Swimming Pool/Hot Tub Service Change (up to and including 200 amps) Service Change (over 200 and including 400 amps) Service Change (over 400 and including 800 amps) Service Change (over 800 amps and including 1000 amps) Service Change (over 1000 amps) Ordinance No, 2451 Page 7 of 14 $ 3.50 3.00 PERMIT FEE $ 12.50 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 15.00 30.00 20.00 15.00 30.00 50.00 75.00 100.00 TABLE 6- FIRE SPRINKLER, FIRE ALARM AND OTHER FIRE RELATED FEES 1. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems a. Underground (Vault & lateral) ea. b. New sprinkler systems c. Addition, Removal, Relocation 1 to 19 heads 20 to 59 heads 60 to 150 heads Over 150 heads $75.00 Valuation $30.00 $65.00 $125.00 $175.00 d. Fire pump, ea. $100.00 e. Plan Review Fee for new fire sprinkler systems is 35% of permit fee. 2. Fire Alarm Systems a. 1 to 10 devices $ 50.00 b. 11 to 25 devices $ 75.00 c. 26 to 100 devices $100.00 d. 101 to 200 devices $200.00 e. 201 and more devices $300.00 f. Plan review fee for all fire alarm systems is 35% of plan review fee 3. Standpipe Systems (per standpipe) 4. Authorized burn permits 5. Underground flammable/combustible liquid storage tanks 6. Above ground combustible liquid storage tanks 7. AbandonmenUremoval/testing of underground combustible/flammable liquid storage tanks (per tank) 8. Fire extinguishing/fire suppression system 9. Installation of any LP gas container, except portable containers, of less than 120 gallons water capacity where natural gas service is not available (per container) 10. Installation of a LP portable cylinder rack (twenty or less cylinders )(per store) 11. Blasting (14 day permit) 12. Pyrotechnic special effects display 13. Residential automatic fire sprinkler system $ 75.00 $200.00 $100.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 70.00 $ 35.00 $ 35.00 $200.00 $ 35.00 $ 50.00 Ordinance No, 2451 Page 8 of 14 TABLE 7 - PLATTING AND ZONING FEES Zoning Fees · Filing Fee for Rezoning Application · Filing Fee for Special Use Permit Application · Filing Fee for Planned Development Application · Filing Fee for Site Plan Review Application Platting Fees · Filing Fee for Preliminary & Final Plat Application Plus $3 per residential lot and $5 per non-residential acre · Filing Fee for Replat Application Plus $3 per lot residential and non-residential · Filing Fee for Amended Plat Application · Plat Recording Fee (24x36) Plus $3.50 for each additional mylar page Plus $2.00 for each paper page attached · Plat Recording Fee (18x24) Plus $3.50 for each additional mylar page Plus $2.00 for each paper page attached · Covenants - per page · Street vacation · Easement vacation · Street Signs - per intersection Varinance Fees · Filing Fee for Zoning Board of Adjustment Residential Property Non-Residential Property · Filing Fee for Sign Review Board · Filing Fee for Landscape Review Board Miscellaneous · Sale of Zoning Ordinance · Zoning Verification Letters · Sale of Zoning Map · Sale of Subdivision Regulations · Sale of Blue Line Copies Ordinance No, 2451 Page 9 of 14 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $400.00 $200.00 $250.00 $200.00 $ 58.00 $ 43.00 $ 5.00 $100.00 $ 50.00 $100.00 $150.00 $175.00 $500.00 $500.00 $ 15.00 $ 15.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 5.00 TABLE 8 - PUBLIC WORKS FEES 1. Inspection Fees a. Street and Drainage Construction b. Water and Wastewater Construction 3% of construction costs 3% of construction costs 2. Construction Plan Review Fees (Street, drainage, water, Wastewater, traffic and earthwork & grading) 2% of construction costs 3. Street Cut Repair Fees $10.00 per square foot SECTION 2. That Section 18. Permit Fees of Ordinance #1813 is deleted in its entirety. SECTION 3. That Section 19. Inspections of Ordinance #1813, paragraph #3 is deleted. SECTION 4. That Section 14. Appeal Process of Ordinance #1813, paragraph #4 is amended to read as follows: "The appellant shall be required to pay a non-refundable fee as established in Fee Ordinance per appeal at the time that the appeal application is submitted to the Building Offi èia I. " SECTION 5. That Section 20. Contractor Registration of Ordinance #1813, paragraph #1 is amended to read as follows: "As a prerequisite to obtaining permits as required by this code, any person or firm operating under the provisions of this code within the City of North Richland Hills shall be registered as a contractor and pay an annual fee as established in Fee Ordinance which shall be valid for one year from the date of issuance." SECTION 6. That Section 9. Permit Fees of Ordinance #2198 is deleted in its entirety. SECTION 7. That Section 10. Contractor Registration of Ordinance #2198, paragraph #1 is amended to read as follows: "As a prerequisite to obtaining electrical permits, any person, firm or business operating under the provisions of this code within the city shall register as an electrical contractor and pay an annual fee as established in the Fee Ordinance which shall be valid Ordinance No, 2451 Page 10 of 14 for one (1) year from the date of issuance. The registration fee is not refundable in cases of revocation or surrender of a contractor registration." SECTION 8. That Section 16. Electrical License Fee Schedule of Ordinance #2198 is amended to read as follows: "Applicants for an electrical license shall pay an annual license fee according to the Fee Ordinance." SECTION 9. That Section 20. Amendments to the Uniform Administrative Code Provisions of the National Electric Code, 1996 Edition, Ordinance #2198, paragraph #3, is deleted. SECTION 10. That Section 11. Inspection is deleted in its entirety. SECTION 11. That Section 12. Contractor Registration of Ordinance #1927, paragraph #1 is amended as follows: "As a prerequisite to obtaining mechanical permits as required by this code, any person or firm operating under the provisions of this code within the City of North Richland Hills shall be registered as a Mechanical Contractor and pay an annual fee as established in the Fee Ordinance which shall be valid for one year from the date of issuance. SECTION 12. That Section 13. Amendments of Ordinance #1927 is amended by deleting paragraph #1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 in its entirety. SECTION 13. That Section 14. Permit Fees of Ordinance #2026 is deleted in its entirety. SECTION 14. That Section 15. Inspections of Ordinance #2026 is deleted in its entirety. SECTION 15. That Section 16. Contractor Registration of Ordinance #2026, paragraph #3 is amended to read as follows: "The plumbing contractor shall register and provide all information requested in writing on forms furnished by the Building Official. Each plumbing contractor shall employ at least one (1) master plumber. The master plumber shall provide proof of current State of Texas Plumbing license, a State of Texas Drivers License and shall pay an annual fee as established in the Fee Ordinance which shall be valid for one year from the date of issuance. Ordinance No. 2451 Page 11 of 14 SECTION 16. That Section 27. Controlled Burning of Ordinance #1814, paragraph #4 is amended to read as follows: "4. Pay permit fee as established in the Fee Ordinance." SECTION 17. That Section 6. Sign Permit Application, paragraph B, subparagraph 7 of Ordinance #2374 is amended to read as follows: "The applicant shall pay a deposit in the amount established in the Fee Ordinance when the permit is application filed. The deposit may be applied to the permit when the permit is secured. If the permit is not secured, the deposit shall be considered a plan review fee and is non-refundable." SECTION 18. That Section 15. Sign Review Board, paragraph F of Ordinance #2374 is amended to read as follows: "Every application for a variance shall be accompanied by a filing fee as established in the Fee Ordinance." SECTION 19. That Section 3. Landscape Review Board, paragraph F of Ordinance #2375 is amended to read as follows: "Every application for a variance shall be accompanied by a filing fee as established in the Fee Ordinance." SECTION 20. That Exhibit "C" to Ordinance #1658 is hereby deleted. SECTION 21. That Ordinance #381 is amended by deleting all references to inspection and plan review fees. SECTION 22. That should any word, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this Ordinance or of the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, be adjudged or held to be void or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of said Ordinance or the Code of Ordinances, which shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 23. It shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance for any person, firm or corporation to attempt to build, develop or improve real property in the City without first obtaining and paying for all permits which are required by the development codes of this City. Ordinance No, 2451 Page 12 of 14 SECTION 24. That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance or of the Code of Ordinances, as amended hereby, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction in the municipal court of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, shall be subject to a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Hundred ($200.00) Dollars for each offense, and each and every day said violation is continued shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 25. The Director of Finance shall review all Development Fees annually and may adjust fees by the increase in the DFW Consumer Price Index for the preceding twelve months as established by the Department of Commerce. SECTION 26. This ordinance shall take effect on March 6, 2000 as the law and charter in such cases provides. DULY PASSED by the City Council of North Richland Hills, Texas, on the 24th day of January 2000. APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST CITY SECRETARY Ordinance No. 2451 Page 13 of 14 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~~~ CITY ATTORNEY }A~ DEPA~T HEAD I . Ordinance No, 2451 Page 14 of 14 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~ Department: City Council Council Meeting Date: 1/24/00 Subject: Appointment to Teen Court Advisory Board. Place 2 Agenda Number: GN 2000-08 Currently Place 2 on the Teen Court Advisory Board is vacant. Councilman Mitchell is recommending the appointment of Ms. Janet Golightly to Place 2. Recommendation: To consider the recommendation of Councilman Mitchell to appoint Ms. Janet Golightly to Place 2 on the Teen Court Advisory Board, term expiring June 30,2000. _. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaDle ~~~1i~ Department Head Signature Finance Director Page 1 of L CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 1/24/00 Subject: Reconsider Action on PZ 99-44 - Ordinance No. 2448. Agenda Number: GN 2000-09 Concerning Request of Mary Jane and Edward LeU for a Zoning Change for Tracts 2A3, 2AB3, 2A3, W. C. Newton Survey Abstract 1182, Addressed as 7591 and 7601 Precinct Line Road from AG-Agricultural to PD - Planned Development for a Wedding Chapel and other Associated Wedding Chapel Uses Case Summary City Council at their January 10, 2000 meeting denied the request of Edward and Mary Lett to rezone three tracts of land containing approximately 5.77 acres on Precinct Line Road from AG-Agricultural to PD-Planned Development for a wedding chapel and other associated accessory wedding chapel uses. The vote failed for lack of a majority vote. Per Council Rules of Procedure a Council member who voted with the majority may make a motion to reconsider an item no later than the next official meeting of the Council. The motion to reconsider can be seconded by any member and will require a majority vote to ca rry. Councilman Welch has requested that Council reconsider action on this request. If Council votes affirmatively to reconsider action on this request, Staff will schedule a public hearing on February 14, 2000. Then on February 14, 2000, Council will hold the public hearing and reconsider their action on the request. If Council does not have a majority vote to reconsider the request, the case is denied and the applicant can not come back with the same request for six months. Council in reconsidering this request should not discuss the merits or facts of the case. Council must decide if they would like to talk about this and authorize Staff to set a public hearing and then discuss the merits and facts of the case. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds ~vallable (;7atAœ/~~ Department Head Signature " Finance Director Page 1 of ' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Department Council Meeting Date: 01/24/00 Subject: Approve "No ParkinQ Anytime" Zone on the West Side of Agenda Number: the 4400-4500 Block of Booth Calloway Road at Rodger Line Drive. - Ordinance 2452 PW 2000-06 Staff has received several complaints about people parking and leaving their vehicles unattended on Booth Calloway Road at Rodger Line Drive. Vehicles parked on the west and east side of Booth Calloway Road near the intersection of Rodger Line Drive create an obstruction of view for motorists looking north and south on Booth Calloway Road. A traffic study was conducted at the location and on all occasions there have been vehicles parked in this area on Booth Calloway Road obstructing the view for motorists on Rodger Line Drive. Staff has discussed this with the Police Department and they are in agreement that "No Parking Anytime" signs should be placed on the west side of Booth Calloway Road to cover the first 145 feet north and south from it's intersection with Rodger Line Drive measured from the street centerline. Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 2452. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Ør~ gJ Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaDle Finance Director Page 1 of ORDINANCE NO. 2452 In order to protect the health and safety of the City and its inhabitants, IT IS ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. It shall hereafter be unlawful for any person to park or leave unattended any motor vehicle at anytime upon the public streets in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas as set out as follows: Along the west side of Booth Calloway Road from the intersection of Rodger Line Drive for 145 feet north and 145 feet south of said intersection, measured from the centerline of Rodger Line Drive. 2. It is ordered that the appropriate NO PARKING ANYTIME signs are authorized and directed to be installed upon the right-of-way of the above public street giving the public notice of these regulations. 3. Any person violating any portion of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not in excess of $200.00. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 24th day of January, 2000. APPROVED: Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary I 77tO i - ( /lA TCH LIN6 - 566 GRID, 20''1-4Z4 ) ~.. I' ~... 11 NO PRRK I N6 HNYTI ME ON BOOTH CHLLoWHY RT HUUGER LINE URIBE 101 FEn BOTH SIDES OF THE INTERSECTION ~ S"c! . ic . --i..-.. ¡ j ! i r-"----.._"_n_.,_,,_,._. _.. j RÐ~~ L.,I tJE::- Df2.tVe... .... 8" PI<: ..... ¡¡ ,I ¡¡ ¡j ,I Ii ¡i .. ~-. " Ii " "I 1 " 1100 I' 7.0. i '.u i '.'2 I '.11 I 'UO i 'U4 ! 'US i Ii ~ Iii I ~~' I i I Ii" ¡¡I I,C.~I i I I : CD, .._nTn_nTn_·Tn_..~nT·_-T-·Tn_·T '" ~ ' , , , _n__n_ ,-, -..- - ,--_:: -: 'u, I a08 I "0' 7." i 7." i 'U' I 7.15 ! 'U, ~ :! ~ ./! I I i ¡ i ia !i ~ "-'-00_2,:1 I -:,_'P.,;!,_.,._..~~~~bk~~9-~ I ¡ "C n_ 8'..J!vc ,: ÕIt .. , --r .I i: ~ i .311 i : .w i 'I: ~: ¡ 1 " I I ',:! : :i'-' .._n_n ! '.0. ! '808 , '8'Z " i, ..__. ~ ,! i I Ii:%: Î I I .,.:"çl í i O::!I¡-'-+- :! E-.. I I ;J.. ~''"' I I W 7 : ~ ¡:: ' Ii g I i~~'Y.cY'\ - I i.._ _.. ~~I WI L ;i ex¡ ,_._n_n-'-.._¡ -~r-r-'-'¡ , i.i ~}-¡I' I ;' \ 1:, ' , I <.. ':%: ~ n_. -.,..-qt,' ,. '. :: ~ <.0' I I I' i,..~'J:" ,- ,'~ fo, \..._n_ -- -"- -_. -J¡ !2' ' ,m i 780' I ..,. l._ ~ "Ct 9,};,i"I-- I, .._._.._.._.,..J ' ,~ , , , ,; ¡ Wi LLI^M '.,. I I '<.08 i~': ' I ,¡ ~AIl""C, i I', I ! .!' ,---+-- ': if <800 I ' : I ii:>,' I !: oo~·.:~oo_L..~__:~·:--=--=-::--::-:::= I:: .m I ' ~'... h. _---~----·6~;~----R'i"iii5ä-L .~.. ~~'-'-"T ! ! ··'r(o.1' :.-~9 : ms j.i-;:: '.04 ¡ '.00 , '80' I ,fø, \:,.,>" ! '8'. : ~. _n_' -j- . I f.:..~, ' I ._u_· _ III ' I r~ ¡ ¡ r <80' i ~: mo I ' :' ~I R UtIJt~. ~ i'c /~-,._~.._". I I B" PV<: ¡ I , l, \ \. \. \ \. ,\ \ ~ "'f _ :) ('..(Jþ ~ ii:> .. PIle. tõ ,\Ý' O~ 'J ~"'''''''I.~ ' ~ ~Q..c>. V~ \.:V~8-. PV<: , i 'uo HE t F M"ÀN'-.. 'U(", :::,.,.. ~ ' ..B::c.L .. .. .. ,,_.~.._._ ____:::. BLA CKMAN RD. ·--~_un~~___n__________..~___ ~ :==::::::;:_-.:.:.::::-~.::..:=:::::..:.:-:==::=:.:~: ~ ..-- ! I ~ i : I f : ~ " ~ ,I ~ 8" ~.,: 4600 s"¡' ~(.. ......', \..."'1' N ~ '--T--T'-'-T---'¡-'TU-'T"-'T'-'--r 7.0' I '806 ¡ 7.0. I ",~ I '.r' I' ,.t, ¡ "t8 I "t8 ! I , Iii ¡¡I i ¡¡I ¡ ¡ I I _..__...._.-..._._..._._..._._.._.._--_.-...._.~ ..--m--.-----u--m---;...~~--M:Ü~Y--¡.-kXÑTi-ŠmLN~.-.... _.______m______. ,! ,I I ," I "00 , '.0. i '80. i 18" i ,.,. ! 7810 I ,u< i 'US ¡ I ! i ¡ ,<\ I ! [ u U_U+_+,,_,+'_U¥~, .-.-J-.-.-J-n-'TI ¡¡ I I \,..~, I I !2: '.0' ! 'u. I '80' I 7.,. I 18" : 7U, : 'SRI ! 7ItII I : I ¡I! I ! ! I , .'" ¡ i i ¡¡I j i ..-""'¥:~:==::=-_:-:::::::::::-..:=::::::-_:::::.::::::-_::=::~..:==::==-_:"::::::::::::.~ 6" vc ARNOLD TER, ic ~ ic ( MATCH LIM6 - SEE GRID:ZOB7-4Z0 ) 1 ,.. 1.. ... 40. ............ HO IN tic tOO 711 INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. I R 00-011 ~ Date: T Subject: January 25, 2000 NRH20 Family Water Park 1999 Season Report Staff has prepared the NRH20 Family Waterpark 1999 Season Reporl. This report presents and evaluates the effectiveness of our marketing efforts, the on-park revenue centers, guest satisfaction ratings, guest surveys, financial performance and attendance for the 1999 season. The Analysis/Conclusions section of the report is included below and summarizes the key points that were discussed with greater detail in the report. The 1999 Season was strong during the peak attendance months of July and August. The wet, cool early May and June coupled with the expansion of other facilities in the area led to a revenue and attendance decrease over the summer as a whole. Operationally, we saw increases in Group Sales and a slight increase in on-park per capita spending. On-park spending is a very important revenue source to NRH20, one that assists in the keeping of park admission fees low. Survey results, a major focus of the 1999 Season, showed increases in key areas. This is a positive as our guests continue to evaluate NRH20 as a successful operation. NRH20 is a service facility. Our ability to remain a successful venture relies on our guests having a good time and enjoying themselves. This is important not only so the guest returns to visit the park again, but also so they tell others about the wonderful time they had at NRH20, The Formula for Family Fun. Respectfully Submitted, r-,J~ " Jim Browne Director of Parks & Recreation -- .. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Announcements January 24,2000 Saturday. February 5 ~ 9th Annual Daddy/Daughter Valentine Dance Call the Recreation Center at 427-6600 for information Saturday. February 19 ~ Parks & Recreation will host the annual KidFish Event at Green Valley Park, for information call 427-6600 February 28 - March 3 » Winter Break Camp NRH at the Recreation Center for information call 427-6600