HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 2000-01-10 Agendas
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
JANUARY 10, 2000 - 5:45 PM
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall - Pre-Council Chambers 7301
Northeast Loop 820.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
1. Discuss Items from Regular January 10,2000 City
Council Meeting (5 Minutes)
2. I R 2000-02 Review of Proposed Cable Transfer to AT&T
(10 Minutes)
3. *Executive Session - The Council may enter into
closed executive Session to discuss the following:
a. Consultation with Attorney under
Government Code § 551.071
Davis et al v. City (10 Minutes)
b. Deliberation Regarding Real Property
under Government Code § 551.072
1. Highway Expansion- (25 Minutes)
2. Rufe Snow (10 Minutes)
4. Adjournment - 6:50 pm
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is
contemplated, it will be taken in open session.
~_.-...~"'''''~"'
P(,\"'i.:;
~~Jbl>Ò
. '5', ~þ p~ ,. . "_"._.__
ph~M~
f',
CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JANUARY 10, 2000 - 7:00 PM
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 7301 Northeast
Loop 820, at 7:00 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or
action.
1. Items on the consent agenda will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for
separate discussion.
2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items
listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open
Meetings Act.
3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should
contact the City Secretary's office at 427-6060 two working days prior to the meeting so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Special Presentations
5. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda
6. Consent Agenda Item(s)
a. Minutes of the Pre-Council Meeting
December 13, 1999
b. Minutes of the City Council Meeting
December 13, 1999
PU 2000-01 c. Award Bid for 2000 Year Model
Vehicles
PU 2000-02 d. Award Bid for Breathing Apparatus to
Safeco, Inc. in the Amount of
$37,431.69
PU 2000-03 e. Award Bid for Fire Hose to Fire Supply,
Inc. in the Amount of $21 ,036
PU 2000-04 f. Award Bid for Bunker Gear to Dooley
Tackaberry in the Amount of $21 ,998
PW 2000-01 g. Vacate a Portion of a Sanitary Sewer
Easement located on the Thornhill Drive
Right-of-Way; Lots 3 and 4, Block 1,
Thornbridge South Addition; Tract 9A,
S. Richardson Survey; and Timber
Drive Right-of-Way - Ordinance No.
2442
PW 2000-02 h. Vacate a Portion of a Waterline
Easement located on the Thornhill Drive
Right-of-Way; Lot 3, Block 1,
Thornbridge South; Tract 9A, S.
Richardson Survey; and Timber Drive
Right-of-Way - Ordinance No. 2441
PW 2000-03 i. Approve 1999/2000 City Street Overlay
Program
7. PZ 99-31 Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to the
Zoning Ordinance, Article 10 Fencing
Regulations, Article 11, Definitions, and Article
3, Permitted Uses Relative to Required
Masonry Screening Wall Requirements, Non-
Masonry Screening Requirements, Screening
of Outdoor Refuse Containers, Screening of
areas for Vehicular Storage, Special Screening
Requirements and mechanical Equipment
Screening and Any Other Deletions or
Additions - Ordinance No. 2444
8. PZ 99-33
9. PZ 99-40
10. PZ 99-41
11 . PZ 99-43
12.PZ 99-44
13. PS 99-36
01/10/2000
Page 3
Public Hearing to Consider the Request of
D & G Specialties, Inc. for a Specific Use
Permit for a Convenience Store and Car Wash
in a "C-1 Commercial District. (Located at the
Northeast Corner of Davis Boulevard and
Precinct Line Road on Proposed Lot 1, Block
1, Gibson Addition) - Ordinance No. 2445
Public Hearing to Consider the Request of
CGS Signs to Amend the Special Use Permit
for Lot 1 R, Block 1, Venture Addition Relative
to Signage (Expo Design at 4900 Davis
Boulevard) - Ordinance No. 2446
Public Hearing to Consider the Request of
Carrera Consulting Engineers, Inc. for a
Zoning Change on Tract 4P1, out of the A.G.
Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1630 from R-7-
MF-Multi Family to C-2-Commercial. (Located
at 4004 Flory Street.) - Ordinance No. 2447
Public Hearing to Consider the Request of
Grayton Koenig for a Zoning Change on Tract
2A04, Abstract 1266, S. Richardson Survey,
addressed as 7813 Green Valley Drive From
AG-Agricultural and LR-Local Retail to R-1-S-
Special Single Family Residential -
Ordinance No. 2443
Public Hearing to Consider the Request of
Mary Jane and Edward Let for a Zoning
Change on Tracts 2A3, 2AB3, and 2A3, W.C.
Newton Survey Abstract 1182, Addressed as
7591 and 7601 Precinct Line Road from AG-
Agricultural to PD-Planned Development for a
Wedding Chapel and Other Associated
Accessory Wedding Chapel Uses -
Ordinance No. 2448
Request of Bill J. Fenimore for an Amended
Final Plat of Blocks 5,6,7, Woodland Oaks
Addition. (Property is Located at the Southeast
Corner of Amundson Drive and Crane Road)
14. PS 99-38
15. LRC 99-08
16.SRC 99-05
17. SRC 99-06
18.GN 2000-01
19. GN 2000-02
01/10/2000
Page 4
Consider Request of Mr. Marvin Smith, Agent
for Mr. Charles Pennington, for a Final Plat of
Lots 1-4, Block 1, Pennington Estates.
(Property Located at the Southeast Inter-
section of Douglas Lane and Bursey Road)
Public Hearing to Consider a Request from
Joe Wade, for a Variance to the Landscape
Regulations, Ordinance No. 2423, to Allow a
Five-Foot Landscape Setback where 15 Feet
is Required. The Property is Known as Lot 1,
Block 1, Eaton Addition in a C2-Commercial
District. (Property is Located at 3819 Rufe
Snow Drive)
Public Hearing to Consider a Request from
Regency Realty Corporation, for an
Interpretation of the Sign Regulations,
Ordinance No. 2374, Section 13, to Allow
Multiple Pole Signs. The Property is Known as
Block 4, Brentwood Estates Addition in a C1-
Commercial District. (Property is Located at
8900 North Tarrant Parkway)
Public Hearing to Consider a Request from
Bank of America, for a Variance from the Sign
Regulations, Ordinance No. 2374, Section 13,
to Allow a Pole Sign. The Property is Known
as Lot 1, Block A, Northland Shopping Addition
in a C1-Commercial District. (Property is
Located at 6100 Rufe Snow Drive)
Appointment of Advisory Board for Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant -
Resolution No. 2000-03
Resolution Affirming Support for Neutral Tax
Treatment of Internet Purchases- Resolution
No. 2000-02
20. GN 2000-03
21 . PW 2000-04
22.
23.
Resolution Authorizing Participation in GUD
No. 8976, TXU Lone Star Pipeline's
Application to the Railroad Commission to
Increase its City Gate Rate Further Authorizing
Participation with the Steering Committee of
Cities Served by Lone Star in Proceedings
before the Railroad Commission and
Subsequent Appeals - Resolution No. 2000-01
Award of Bid on Watauga Road Booster Pump
Station 1999 Improvements to Midstate
Construction Services, Inc. in the Amount of
$201,225.10
a) Citizens Presentation
b) I nformation and Reports
Adjournment
.¡-
01/10/2000
Page 5
~ 6"'f,dPtV
t),)D~~
fA,J ~,{k
..
~
~
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. IR 00-002
G
~ Date: January 10, 2000
T Subject: Review Proposed Cable Transfer to AT&T
On December 8, 1999 staff sent an informal report to the Council to inform you of Charter
Communications' announcement that it has signed a letter of intent with AT&T Broadband (
and Internet Services to trade a number of cable systems. As you may recall, the proposed
trade includes the exchange of Charter's systems in the Fort Worth area for AT&T's St. Louis
systems. At that time staff had met with representatives from Charter as well as members of
the cable consortium (separate meetings) to discuss the proposed transfer of this system.
This informal report serves to update the Council on the issues involved in this proposed
transfer and to inform you about what has transpired thus far as well as upcoming meetings.
As was mentioned in the December 8, 1999 informal report, there are two issues to be
considered by the Council at this point. The first is whether the City Council desires to have
Mr. Paul Allen or his desianee aooear before the Council to explain the reasons for the
transfer so soon after the previous transfer as provided in the Transfer Agreement you
approved in March 1999. The second is what are the Council's thouahts regarding this
proposed transfer and how to proceed.
L
In regards to how to oroceed on this matter, it might serve you well to have some information
on what the City staff as well as member cities of the cable consortium see as the initial
issues of this transfer. First, in the Transfer Agreement Charter agreed to provide North
Richland Hills Citicable with 3 character generators and to install an INET using fiber optic
cable between City Hall, Fire Station #1, Fire Station #2, Fire Station #3, and NRH20. At our
December meeting, Charter representatives assured staff that these matters would be taken
care of before the transfer of the system to AT&T was complete. Staff is following up on
these matters.
Second, at the December meeting of the cable consortium, most of the members of the
consortium seemed to feel that transferrina the system to AT&T would not be a oroblem if
they will aaree to the same Transfer Aareement all the member cities approved in March
1999. This Transfer Agreement includes specific customer service standards and reporting
requirements, the creation of a customer care team that works directly with the cities to
resolve citizen complaints, and significant liquidated damages in the event the cable
operator did not meet the requirements. The Transfer Agreement also includes provisions
regarding continuity of management, company accountability for major ownership and
operational changes, and technological and operational requirements that must be met when
HDTV is fully implemented in this area. All of these provisions were strenuously fought for
in the previous transfer negotiations as a result of the several thousand citizen complaints
and concerns received by member cities, including North Richland Hills, in 1997.
,--.
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS
',,--
',,--
,
~
Finally, it was felt that the cable consortium should take this opportunity to address ooen
access of Internet Service Providers (lSPs) to the high speed Internet services now provided
over the cable lines. As you may be aware, cable companies, including Charter, are
providing Internet service via cable lines using @Home as their ISP. Currently, Charter and
AT&T have exclusive agreements with @Home to provide Internet service. However, as a
result of a recent court decision (AT&T Corp. v. City of Portland, 1999) AT&T was required
to allow unaffiliated ISPs to connect their equipment to AT&Ts cable modem platform. This
case is on appeal; however, a decision is not expected until February 2000. As a result of
this decision, AT&T has announced that it will provide open access to its cable and fixed
wireless systems after the expiration of its exclusive contract with @Home. The consortium
seemed to feel that it might be a good idea to negotiate an open access provision in this
Transfer to ensure that users of this service are provided with a choice.
As far as upcoming meetings are concerned, representatives from Charter and AT&T will
meet with Greg Vick and me on January 12, 2000. In addition, I have heard from the City of
Fort Worth that Charter is setting up ð meeting with all of the cities they serve on January
26, 2000. The purpose of this meeting is to formally announce the transfer, possibly
distribute the formal requests to transfer the system, and provide A T& T an opportunity to
introduce themselves to the cities and give an overview of their operations. I have not
received notification from Charter regarding the January 26th meeting, but I expect to receive
it in the next couple of weeks. Once we receive the formal request to transfer the system
(FCC form 1294), we have 120 days to act unless both parties agree to extend that time
period. I will provide the Council with additional updates as events unfold.
I hope this information is helpful to you, and I look forward to reviewing this information with
you Monday.
Respectfully submitted,
1tL.L= ../!~
Paulette Hartman
Administrative Assistant to the City Manager
Present:
Absent:
MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE
PRE-COUNCIL ROOM AT CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - DECEMBER 13,1999 - 5:45 P.M.
Charles Scoma
JoAnn Johnson
Lyle E. Welch
Russell Mitchell
Frank Metts, Jr.
Don Phifer
T. Oscar Trevino, Jr.
Larry J. Cunningham
Steve Norwood
Greg Vick
Alicia Richardson
Rex McEntire
Greg Dickens
Larry Koonce
Donna Huerta
Paulette Hartman
Marcy Ratcliff
Mike Curtis
Bill Thornton
Melani Fragge
Thomas Powell
Terry Kinzie
Andy Jones
Mark Johnson
Donna Enos
Mayor
Mayor Pro T em
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Managing Director of Community Services
Assistant City Secretary
Attorney
Public Works Director
Finance Director
Director of Communications
Administrative Assistant to City Manager
Director of Planning
Assistant Public Works Director
Assistant Parks & Recreation Director
Director of Human Resources
Director of Support Services
Director of Information Services
Fire Chief
Planner
Purchasing Agent
Matt Milano, Ph.D.
Randy Shiflet
Patricia Hutson
Councilman
Deputy City Manager
City Secretary
ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the Pre-Council meeting to
order at 5:45 p.m.
DISCUSS ITEMS Agenda Item No. 14 - PU 99-053 - Councilman
FROM REGULAR Metts asked the amount of the winning bid. Chief
DECEMBER 13, Jones advised Councilman Metts that he did not
99 CITY have the exact amount, but the bid was somewhere
COUNCIL in the amount of $27,000 - $28,000.
MEETING
Agenda Item 16, 17 and 18 - PW 99-028, PW 99-
Pre-Council Minutes
December 13,1999
Page 2
ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT
029 and PW 99-030 - Councilman Metts inquired
how the city arrived at the 4.5% interest rate for
financing Watauga's share of Rufe Snow's Drive
Improvements, Section B (Fair Meadows Drive to
High Lawn Terrace). Mr. Koonce stated that they
looked at various interest rates and felt 4.5% would
be attractive to Watauga. Mr. Cunningham advised
Council another contributing factor is the city would
have access to the full amount of money up front,
which the city could invest and that would offset part
of the interest expense.
Agenda Item 9 - PS 99-22 - Mayor Scoma brought
to Council's attention when the plat was originally
approved in 1990; a provision was made to require a
concrete channel for the drainage. It was brought to
Mayor Scoma's attention that the rail line (DART)
would not permit a concrete channel. Mayor Scoma
asked Staff to address how the city will address the
drainage for this particular area prior to the issuance
of a permit. Mr. Greg Dickens advised Mayor
Scoma that prior to a building permit on Lot 4 the city
will look at all types of treatments to stabilize the
slopes.
Mayor Scoma asked about the left turn off of Holiday
Lane onto Mid Cities Boulevard going southbound.
He would like to know if it would be appropriate at
this time to get an additional right-of-way that
Planning and Zoning said applicant did not need due
to the wideninq of Holiday Lane up north.
IR 99-248 - Mayor Scoma advised Council and Staff that the GREG VICK
LIBRARY computer demonstration would be postponed to a
COMPUTER later date due to the length of Executive Session.
DEMONSTRATION
ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma announced at 5:59 pm that the
meeting would adjourn to Executive Session to
discuss personnel matters and economic
development as authorized by Section 551.074 and
I·· Section 551.072 of the Local Government Code.
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson - City Secretary
Pre-Council Minutes
December 13,1999
Page 3
Charles Scoma - Mayor
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - DECEMBER 13, 1999 - 7:00 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order December 13, 1999 at 7:00 p.m.
Present:
Charles Scoma
JoAnn Johnson
Lyle E. Welch
Russell Mitchell
Frank Metts, Jr.
Don Phifer
T. Oscar Trevino, Jr.
Absent:
Matt Milano
Staff:
Larry J. Cunningham
Steve Norwood
Greg Vick
Alicia Richardson
Rex McEntire
Absent:
Randy Shiflet
Patricia Hutson
ROLL CALL
Mayor
Mayor Pro T em
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Managing Director of Community Services
Assistant City Secretary
Attorney
Deputy City Manager
City Secretary
Mayor Scoma introduced Ms. Ann Clarksdale, Principal, Foster Village Elementary
School. Ms. Lindy Andrews, Assistant Principal, Ms. Stone, 2nd grade teacher and
students accompanied Ms. Clarksdale
2.
INVOCATION
Jordan Stevens, student, led the invocation.
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Lauren McKinney, student, led the pledge.
City Council Minutes
December 13,1999
Page 2
4.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
Citizens Fire Academy
Mayor Scoma recognized Chief Jones and students from the first graduating class of
Citizens Fire Academy.
Christmas Contest Awards
Ms. Patsy Tucker, Beautification Chairperson, advised Council that the Beautification
Commission completed the judging for their first annual Christmas Lighting Contest.
The three categories and winners are as follows: Thematic - Mrs. Nan Harper, 3841
Diamond Loch West; Inspirational/Religious - Mr. Greg Nickell, 4821 Lariat; and
Festive - Mrs Helena Cundiff, 6721 Mabell.
5.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
Councilman Welch removed item 6G, GN 99-148 with action to be taken later in the
meeting.
6.
APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
APPROVED
A. MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 13,1999
B. MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 13,1999
C. GN 99-141 - ANNEXATION PLAN - ORDINANCE NO. 2436
D. GN 99-142 - RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VARIABLE RATE DEMAND
REVENUE BONDS (TECNOL, INC. PROJECT) SERIES 1989 - RESOLUTION
NO. 99-99
E. GN 99-144 - AUTHORIZATION FOR SIGNATURES FOR UNMARKED LICENSE
PLATES - RESOLUTION NO. 99-94
F. GN 99-145 - VACATE A PORTION OF A UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ON
TRACT A, BLOCK 1, SUNNYBROOK ADDITION - ORDINANCE NO. 2438
City Council Minutes
December 13, 1999
Page 3
G. GN 99-148 - APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - CITY
ATTORNEY - RESOLUTION NO. 99-100 (REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA)
H. PU 99-049 -AWARD BID FOR HEWLETT PACKARD GIS SERVER TO
STONEBRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE AMOUNT OF $36,411
I. PU 99-050 - AUTHORIZE CONTRACT EXTENSION FOR ANNUAL
T-SHIRT CONTRACT TO ACTIVE IMPRESSIONS - RESOLUTION NO. 99-71
J. PU 99-051 - AUTHORIZATION TO EXTEND AUTOMOTIVE PARTS CONTRACT
WITH DICK SMITH, INC. - RESOLUTION NO. 99-98
K. PW 99-027 - APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH
ELLIOTT & HUGHES, INC. FOR BIG FOSSIL CREEK EROSION CONTROL
IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II -RESOLUTION NO. 99-95
L. PAY 99-008 - APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 15 IN THE AMOUNT OF
$61,162.38 TO J.L. BERTRAM CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING, INC. FOR
HIGHTOWER DRIVE, SECTIONS A2 & B - PAVING AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved to approve the remaining items on consent agenda.
Councilman Metts seconded the motion.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
7.
PZ 99-37 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDING ORDINANCE 1874,
ZONING REGULATIONS, ADDING A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING
CATEGORY AND AMENDING ALL SECTIONS OF THE ORDINANCE AS
NECESSARY - ORDINANCE NO. 2439
DENIED
Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, summarized PZ 99-37 for Council. She
advised Council that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval for
the addition of the Neighborhood Commercial District and other associated
amendments to Zoning Ordinance No. 1874 as drafted in Ordinance No. 2439.
Council discussed the item.
Mayor Scoma opened the Public Hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak in
favor of the item to come forward.
Mayor Scoma asked for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to come forward. The
following spoke in opposition:
City Council Minutes
December 13, 1999
Page 4
Mr. Harvey Greenwald, 5016 Strummer Road; Mr. Robert Jones, 5024 Wyoming Trail;
and Barbara Davis 4900 Wyoming Trail.
Mr. Doug Gilliland, 4901 Strummer, asked for point of clarification. He wanted to know
if this Ordinance did not pass what would happen to item 8, PZ 99-38.
Mayor Scoma advised Mr. Gilliland that the next item would be addressed separately, if
this ordinance is turned down, then Council needs to decide what they are going to do
with the next issue in regards to rezoning Lots 2-11, Block D, Richland Oaks Addition.
If this Ordinance is turned down it will be a mute point as far as this particular
application for zoning.
Mayor Scoma granted Mr. Gilliland the chance to speak in favor of PZ 99-37.
Mayor Scoma closed the Public Hearing.
Councilman Metts moved to approve PZ 99-37, Ordinance No. 2439. Councilman
Phifer seconded the motion.
Mayor Pro Tem Johnson asked Councilman Metts if he would mind amending his
motion to include the following: (1) light height not to exceed 8 feet; and (3) to eliminate
all but the office use; and (3) site plans to be required for development.
Councilman Metts accepted the amendment. Amendment died due to lack of second.
Mayor Pro Tem Johnson proposed a second amendment that would limit the light
height to 8 feet and require a site plan prior to development.
Councilman Metts accepted the amendment. Councilman Phifer seconded the
amendment.
Motion denied 4-3; with Councilmen Metts, Phifer and Mayor Pro Tem Johnson voting
for, and Councilmen Welch, Mitchell, Trevino voting against and Mayor Scoma breaking
the tie voting against.
8.
PZ 99-38 - APPEAL HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDING ORDINANCE 1874,
ARTICLE 5, SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT REGULATIONS BY ADDING SECTION
560, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL OVERLAY #1 PROVIDING DESIGN AND
OPERATING CRITERIA FOR PROPERTIES ZONED NC NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL AND KNOWN AS LOTS 2-11, BLOCK D, RICHLAND OAKS
ADDITION - ORDINANCE NO. 2440
DENIED
City Council Minutes
December 13, 1999
Page 5
Ms. Ratcliff summarized PZ 99-38 advising the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended denial of the proposed amendments, with the action of Council on Item,
PZ 99-37, Staff also recommends denial of PZ 99-38.
Councilman Metts stepped out of the room at 8:27 pm
Councilman Metts returned at 8:31 pm.
Mayor Scoma opened the Public Hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak in
favor to come forward. The following spoke in favor of PZ 99-38:
Mr. Doug Gilliland, 4901 Strummer Drive; Wanda Waller, representing aunt who resides
at 4809 Strummer.
Mayor Scoma asked for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to come forward. The
following spoke in opposition:
Mr. Charles Wells, 4921 Wyoming; and Mr. Harvey Greenwald, 5016 Strummer.
Mayor Scoma closed the Public Hearing and advised the public and Council there is no
action to be taken.
Mayor Scoma recessed the meeting at 8:38 pm to Executive Session.
Mayor Scoma reconvened the meeting at 9:08 pm.
6G.
GN 99-148 - APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - CITY
ATTORNEY - RESOLUTION NO. 99-100
APPROVED
Councilman Metts moved to approve GN 99-148, Resolution No. 99-100 as amended in
Pre-Council, with Mayor designated as signatory. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson seconded
the motion.
Motion to approve carried 5-1; with Councilmen Welch, Mitchell, Metts, Phifer and
Mayor Pro Tem Johnson voting for, and Councilman Trevino voting against.
9.
PS 99-22 - CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF OWEN D. LONG FOR A REPLAT OF
LOTS 1 R, 2R, 3 AND 4, BLOCK 34, FOX HOLLOW ADDITION (LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF HOLIDAY LANE AND MID-CITIES BOULEVARD)
APPROVED
City Council Minutes
December 13,1999
Page 6
Ms. Ratcliff summarized PS 99-22. The Commission felt that since the majority of
Holiday Lane north of Mid-Cities Boulevard is not as wide as the Thoroughfare Plan
calls for and the easement would also accomplish the same thing, they recommended
approval. Staff has no conflict with recommendation.
Councilman Phifer moved, seconded by Councilman Trevino to approve PS 99-22.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
10.
PS 99-24 - CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF KINGSGATE CORPORATION TO
REPLAT LOT 3, BLOCK 2, CULP ADDITION INTO LOTS 3R AND 6-12, BLOCK 2
(PROPERTY FRONTS NORTHEAST PARKWAY, DAVIS BOULEVARD AND ODELL
STREET)
APPROVED
Councilman Phifer abstained from discussion and voting.
Ms. Ratcliff recapped PS 99-24.
Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Metts to approve PS 99-24.
Motion to approve carried 5-0, with Councilman Phifer abstaining.
11.
GN 99-143 - AUTHORIZING AMBULANCE RATE STRUCTURE REVISIONS -
ORDINANCE NO. 2437
APPROVED
Mr. Andy Jones, Fire Chief, summarized GN 99-143.
Councilman Trevino moved, seconded by Councilman Welch to approve GN 99-143,
Ordinance No. 2437.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
12.
GN 99-146 - SUPPORTING HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 1257, THE
TRANSPORTATION FAIRNESS ACT OF 1999, IN THE UNITED STATES
CONGRESS - RESOLUTION NO. 99-92
APPROVED
City Council Minutes
December 13, 1999
Page 7
Ms. Paulette Hartman, Assistant to the City Manager, summarized GN 99-146.
Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Metts to approve GN 99-
146. Resolution No. 99-92.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
13.
GN 99-147 - APPROVAL OF COMPENSATION PLAN MARKET ADJUSTMENT
APPROVED
Ms. Melani Fragge, Director of Human Resources, summarized GN 99-147.
Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilman Trevino to approve GN 99-147.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
14.
PU 99-053 - AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF AMBULANCE FROM EMERGENCY
VEHICLES OF TEXAS
APPROVED
Chief Jones summarized PU 99-053.
Councilman Phifer moved, seconded by Councilman Welch to approve PU 99-053.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
15.
PU 99-054 - AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF SELF-SERVICE CHECKOUT EQUIPMENT
FOR LIBRARY
APPROVED
Mr. Steve Brown, Library Director, summarized PU 99-054.
Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Trevino to approve PU 99-
054.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
.._." '_'~'M_'''~_'_'___'''__'~'_''''_h'__~__'_~__~____.
City Council Minutes
December 13,1999
Page 8
16.
PW 99-028 - APPROVE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CONCERNING COST
PARTICIPATION IN RUFE SNOW DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS, SECTION B (FAIR
MEADOWS DRIVE TO HIGH LAWN TERRACE) BETWEEN NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS AND WATAUGA - RESOLUTION NO. 99-96
APPROVED
Councilman Trevino abstained from discussion and voting.
Mr. Greg Dickens, Director of Public Works, summarized PW 99-028 - PW 99-030.
Councilman Mitchell moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Johnson to approve
PW 99-028, Resolution No. 99-96.
Motion to approve carried 5-0, with Councilman Trevino abstaining.
17.
PW 99-029 - APPROVE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CONCERNING COST
PARTICIPATION IN RUFE SNOW DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS, SECTION C (HIGH
LAWN TERRACE TO BURSEY ROAD) BETWEEN NORTH RICH LAND HILLS AND
WATAUGA - RESOLUTION NO. 99-97
APPROVED
Councilman Trevino abstained from discussion and voting.
Mr. Greg Dickens discussed PW 99-029 with item 16.
Councilman Mitchell moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Johnson to approve PW 99-
029, Resolution No. 99-97.
Motion to approve carried 5-0, with Councilman Trevino abstaining.
18.
PW 99-030 - APPROVE URBAN STREET PROGRAM AGREEMENT WITH THE
STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE FROM
FAIR MEADOWS DRIVE TO HIGH LAWN TERRACE - RESOLUTION NO. 99-14
APPROVED
Councilman Trevino abstained from discussion or voting.
Mr. Greg Dickens discussed PW 99-030 with item 16.
-'""-'-'~~'-""~-'-'~_.~--~'.~'-~.~...~~-~------------
City Council Minutes
December 13,1999
Page 9
Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Mitchell to approve
PW 99-030.
Motion to approve carried 5-0, with Councilman Trevino abstaining.
19.
A. CITIZENS PRESENTATION
None.
B. INFORMATION AND REPORTS
City offices will be closed for Christmas Eve, Friday, December 24th and Christmas Day,
Saturday, December 25th and on Saturday, January 1st for New Year's Day.
Christmas festivities will be held at the City Hall Lobby on Friday, December 1 ih from
11 :00 am to 1 :00 pm. Entertainment and refreshments will be provided.
Your complimentary copy of the City's 1999 Annual Report/2000 City Calendar will be
available at several different city office locations beginning next week.
The December water bill will include the Y2K newsletter which includes information
about the city's preparedness as well as information from our major utility companies.
16.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Scoma adjourned the meeting at 9:48 pm.
Charles Scoma - Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson - City Secretary
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Finance / Support Services
Council Meeting Date: 1/10/00
Subject: Award Bid for 2000 Year Model Vehicles
Agenda Number:
PU 2000-01
In the 1999/2000 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for the purchase of
vehicles. Formal bids were solicited and prices were also obtained through the
cooperative purchasing agreement with HGAC. The results are attached.
Federal legislation requires we have a minimum number of Bi-fuel propane powered
vehicles in the fleet. Ford is the only manufacturer that produces Bi-fuel vehicles certified
from the factory. Village Ford met the specifications and general conditions of the bid and
was low bidder for the Bi-fuel vehicles.
The bid submitted by Jerry's Chevrolet for the Impala Police vehicles did not include the
General Motors extended warranty policy as requested in the specifications. The warranty
they offered is an after market policy that is not accepted by all Chevrolet dealers. The bid
submitted by Classic Chevrolet for the Sport Utility vehicle did not meet the minimum
specifications. The sales rep stated he read the specifications wrong and did not quote the
correct vehicle. The bid submitted by Showcase Chevrolet met all the specifications and
general conditions of the bid and the vehicles can be delivered within 180 days.
Recommendation: To award the bid for three Bi-fuel Ford pickups to Village Ford in the
amount of $64,950 and award the bid for Chevrolet vehicles to Showcase Chevrolet, Inc.
in the amount of $345,795.
510-7032-712.74-10
001-7503-541.74-10
001-8002-531.74-10
130-8002-531.74-10
130-8003-531.74-1 0
130-8004-531.74-10
130-8008-531.74-1 0
$147,600
23,630
22,020
66,060
22,125
110,100
19.210
$410,745
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget - r9
O~er ~
4
Department Hea Ignature
Finance Review
Account Number See Above
Sufficient Funds Available
'LL ,-. ~
¡ ¡ DOS!u,- ~ F;nonœ 0'.....
~~~
City Ma ger Signature
Page 1 of
C)
~
z
C
-I
o
~
ï
iIt
.þo
.....
o
-:.....
.þo
c.n
(:)
o
-Eß
I\)
I\)
o
~
-'"
-'"
0>
-'"
-Eß
.þo
I\)
I\)
Ò'¡
....,¡
....,¡
-'"
-'"
-Eß
-'"
(X)
.C1>
C11
(X)
(0
o
(0
C".)
CD
0)
"Tl
-'"
C11
o
OJ
T"
2'
æ.
"Tl
o
a.
1J
C'r
"
c::
"C
-Eß
C1>
.þo
CD
C11
o
o
o
"Tl~
o -
-.. 0)
a.CC
CD
-Eß
C1>
C1>
'0
(X)
(0
N
C11
õ
CD
CD
"Tlc....
o 0)
-.. -..
a.3
o
::s
-Eß
....,¡
o
è»
.þ.
.þ.
ë:.n
(X)
1J
::r
--0
Io
G>:::
::Þ"Tl
(')0
--..
a.
-Eß
....,¡
....,¡
CD
C11
(0
o
o
-I
CD
X
"Tl0)
o f/I
-.. s:
a.O
-
o
-..
f/I
en
c:
m
~
o
~
ï
.,.
W
.þo
c.n
-:.....
c.ø
c.n
(:)
o
.,.
.....
c.n
.þo
W
N
N
W
en
iIt
W
c.n
.....
ÒO
W
N
(.n
W
iIt
.....
o
00
'"en
w
o
(:)
c.ø
iIt
W
c.n
o
'"en
N
.þo
(:)
o
iIt
W
c.n
..¡
ëø
.....
c.ø
N
N
(0
CD
0)
3"
"C
0)
ii)
1J
Q.
Õ·
CD
<
CD
::r
Õ·
CD
-Eß
-'"
(0
!:Þ
-'"
(X)
o
o
o
z
o
OJ
ã:
-Eß
-'"
(0
C11
è»
C11
(0
-'"
....,¡
z
o
OJ
ã:
-Eß
I\)
o
I\)
N
....,¡
C11
o
o
-Eß
I\)
o
I\)
N
I\)
C11
œ
C1>
-'"
CD
0)
CI>
"C
o
:4-
C
g
-<
<
CD
::r
ci'
CD
-Eß
I\)
I\)
-'"
I\)
C11
o
o
-Eß
I\)
C".)
C11
-'"
-'"
W
o
-Eß
I\)
C".)
'"....¡
C".)
C".)
:....
.þ.
z
o
OJ
ã:
-Eß
I\)
-'"
Ò'¡
-'"
.þ.
o
o
-Eß
I\)
C".)
~
C11
C11
œ
C".)
-'"
CD
~
1J
0)
f/I
f/I
CD
::s
CC
CD
-..
<
0)
::s
-Eß
I\)
C".)
Ò'¡
C".)
o
o
o
-Eß
I\)
.þ.
Ò'¡
.þ.
o
W
C1>
-Eß
I\)
C11
N
....,¡
C".)
....,¡
I\)
z
o
OJ
ã:
-Eß
I\)
.þ.
-'"
C1>
o
o
o
-Eß
I\)
C11
~
o
(0
N
C".)
CD
0)
"Tl
~
CI>
Ñ"
CD
(')
0)
-..
CC
o
<
0)
::s
-Eß
-'"
(0
N
-'"
o
o
o
-Eß
I\)
o
Ò'¡
C1>
C11
o
o
-Eß
I\)
-'"
'0
o
ex>
o
o
-Eß
I\)
I\)
-'"
C".)
-'"
~
(0
-Eß
-'"
(0
W
C11
o
o
o
-Eß
-'"
(0
N
ex>
o
o
o
C11
CD
0)
I
0)
:¡;;
-f
o
::s
1J
ci'
"
c::
"0
OJ I\)
ã:g
00
?<
(X) CD
(O::r
.þ. Õ"
CD
f/I
-Eß
ex>
I\)
Ò'¡
C11
o
o
o
(')CI>
::r::r
CD 0
< :E
a (')
-0)
CD f/I
-CD
-Eß
ex>
!.11
C11
o
C11
:....
o
(')I
::rc::
CD a.
< -.
-.. tT
o c::
- -..
~CC
-Eß
ex>
C11
CD
C11
....,¡
Co
o
(')
::rc....
CD CD
< -..
-..-<!
o -
[f/I
-Eß
ex>
C1>
~
(0
ex>
0>
o
(')"Tl
::r0)(')
CD :;"
< tT ::r
-.. 0) c::
o ::s ~
[~
-Eß
ex>
C".)
N
I\)
C11
o
o
9(')
CD -
< 0)
-.. f/I
o !!!"
CD(')
-
-Eß
ex>
....,¡
~
ex>
W
o
-(')-f
I ~:::!.
G> < 0)
::Þ -.. ::s
(')Q.CQ.
-CD CD
-
:-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Finance / Fire Department
Council Meeting Date: 1/10/00
Subject: Award Bid for Breathing Apparatus to Safeco, Inc. in the Agenda Number: PU 2000-02
Amount of $37,431.69
In the 1999/2000 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for the purchase of
breathing apparatus and equipment. Formal bids were solicited for self-contained
breathing units, cylinders, face pieces and connect kits and the results are outlined below.
W.W. Grainger
$19,478.36 (incomplete bid)
Briggs Weaver
11~¡~.jji~§i
$37,431.73
$38,900.49
$39,270.37
Safeco, Inc.
Texas Mill Supply
Casco, Inc.
The bid submitted by W.W. Grainger was incomplete because they did not submit a bid for
the self-contained breathing units and the items that Grainger did bid on were higher than
Safeco.
This equipment will replace outdated equipment that has become unreliable. Safeco, Inc.
met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and can deliver the equipment
within four weeks,
Recommendation: To award the bid for breathing apparatus and equipment to Safeco,
Inc. in the amount of $37,431.69.
Finance Review
~dw"J G .~LW Üæ:
Department H . d Signature I
Account Number 001-9003-532.74-05
§uffi~i~nt ~d~ ~te f\ ~
\~-:.~ ~. ~ ~~
~ Finance Director
~~~
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget X
Other
Page 1 of
N N N ,þ. ,þ.
(J'1 0 N CÞ CÞ
CÞ CÞ CÞ !U !U
!U !U !U
0 c ç;; ,þ. =Þ:»en =Þ:O»cn OJ en
c: CÞ ~ (J'1 m'OCÞ m'O '0 CÞ ë: CÞ
c') 3 0 (')'0 ::;; (") =. '0 ::;; 7'
"'" I» 0 s::~ (") s:: 0 I» (") 0 (")
~ ::J ..., 0
(") ::J "'tJ .....1» 0 ..... I» 0 I 0
a. en (J'1- ::J - ::J CD
0 CD (J'1 c: ::J
oC: fi) - co fi)
::J " (") o(/ ..... (/ I» -..
::J I» "'tJ :r 0 ~ S' S'
CÞ n ..., 'So N N
~ CÞ CÞ S' s:: CÞ s:: CÞ CÞ
(/ a. a. a.
"'tJ (/ a. ..... ..... c:
~ N OJ Q!. OJ OJ
ãr c: CÞ (J'1 ..., N ..., CD
..., ..., CÞ (J'1 CÞ
n CÞ 0 '0
-t CÞ I» 0 c: I» I»
- -a - -
0 =r =r =r
~ S' 0 S' S'
ee (/ co co
ï CÞ »
'0
'0
I»
tß tß Z Z G) õ3
..... r ..... ..., ~ -
co ,þ. 0 0 I» c:
tß S' ~ (/
):.. (J'1 CD '0 OJ OJ ee QO
-.. ..... m 0 ë: ë: CÞ
CD (J'1 ..... ..... ..., m
W ë;, :,:.. :,:.. .0
m 0 0 m c:
'Õ.
en 3
CÞ
tß tß tß I» ::J
ú) tß ..... tß ..... êÐ' -
-.. r ,þ. N co 0 n
):.. N CD tn N ÇJ
ú) ú) ..... N -.. CD 5'
..... -.. ú) ú) 0 -..
m :...,¡ N 0 ..... (J'1 r
co (J'1 0 N m m
tß -i
tß tß en CÞ
ú) tß ..... tß ..... c: ><
-.. r ,þ. N co 0 '0 I»
):.. N CD (J'1 N '0 (/
ú) ú) ..... N -.. CD -< ~
..... -.. ú) ú) ~ -..
:...,¡ -.. N 0 m
ú) (J'1 0 N m 0
tß tß tß 5'
ú) tß ..... ~ ..... a. (")
CD .,þ. ú) co 0 c: I»
CD ~ CD Ò> N (/ (/
(J'1 (J'1 - n
...,
0 ..... ,þ. CD 0 m ã¡ 0
0 ..... 0 ~ ,þ. ,þ. (/
:,:.. N 0 ..... (J'1 ë;,
co (J'1 0 N m m
tß ~ ~ ~ ~OJ
ú) ~ ..... ..... .....
co ,þ. ú) 0 0 CÞ ...,
N r ):.. tn '0 '"....,¡ I» cõ'
<ee
-.. (J'1 N (J'1 ,þ. co CÞ (/
0 co 0 -.. 0 N ...,
W N N :...,¡ N Co
-.. (J'1 0 N CD N
·'
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
',--
Department: Finance / Fire Department
Council Meeting Date: 1/10/00
Subject: Award Bid for Fire Hose to Fire Supply, Inc. in the
Amount of $21,036
Agenda Number: PU 2000-03
In the 1999/2000 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for the purchase of fire
hose. Formal bids were solicited for 3" and 5" hose and the results are listed below.
Lakeffect Outfitters
$18,644
llil::~~~
$21,640
$22,670
Fire Supply, Inc.
Metro Fire Apparatus
Snap- Tite Hose
'--
The bid submitted by Lakeffect Outfitters did not meet the minimum specifications. The
hose offered by Lakeffect is extruded hose and the specifications required laminated hose.
Extruded hose has been used by the Fire Department in the past and it has been
discovered that after five or six years the hose begins to crack where it is folded. Also
extruded hose is a single-layer of material that is thicker and weaker than two laminated
pieces. This results in heavier hose that will not lie as flat in hose beds and ultimately
reduces the amount of hose that is carried on the fire truck. The bid submitted by Fire
Supply, Inc. met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and can be
delivered within six weeks.
Recommendation: To award the bid for fire hose to Fire Supply, Inc. in the amount of
$21,036.
Finance Review
awQJA~~,
Department ad Signat re
Account Number 001-9003-532.61-65
Sufficient Funds Available
I~~. ~MϾ~
~~
. City Mager Signature
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Page 1 of
N ...... ......
N 0) N
CD CD CD
Q) Q) Q)
c.n w ~ CD "
= = ä: ::;.
x x x CD
...... ...... c.n 0 :r:
0 0 0 0
q 0 I 0
00 en
en en <0 CD
CD en CD 0)
(') CD (')
~ -
- Õ·
Õ·
:J Õ· :J
en :J en
en
-t
~
r-
~ ~ r
...... ...... ~ ~
00 0 c.n N 0 Q)
èn Ò) Õ1 W c ~
9i CD
.þ. N 0 ...... ~
.þ. .þ. .þ. 0) -
0 0 0 0 CD (')
.., -
0 0 0 0 en en
~ ~
N ...... ~ ~
...... N .0) N
'0 W ...... Õ1 en
w N 0) c.n c
0) 0 0 0) "C "
0 0 0 0 "C ::;.
0 0 0 0 -< CD
~ ~ »s:
N ...... ~ ~
...... N 0) N "C CD
èn c.n W èn "C -
Q) ..,
~ 00 <0 00 .., 0
0 .þ. 00 00 Q) "
0 0 0 0 -
c æ'
0 0 0 0 en
~ ~
N ...... ~ ~ en
N W 0) N :J
èn tv èn '".....¡ Q)
0) 00 N c.n :r:'9
<0 00 c.n c.n o -i
(,) (,) ëc 0 en CD
0) 0) N 00 CD
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Finance 1 Fire Department
Council Meeting Date: 1/10/00
Subject: Award Bid for Bunker Gear to Dooley Tackaberry in the
Amount of $21 ,998
Agenda Number: PU 2000-04
In the 1999/2000 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for the purchase of
firefighter bunker gear. All bunker gear purchased must meet minimum standards set by
the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) and the Texas Commission of Fire Protection.
Formal bids were solicited for 18 sets of bunker gear. A set consists of one coat and one
pair of pants. The results are outlined below.
Rescue Concepts
$18,554
$18,568
~1:1::;:1I
$44,519
Lakeffect Outfitters
Dooley Tackaberry
Total Fire Group
The bid submitted by Rescue Concepts only met 48% of the specified criteria and the bid
submitted by Lakeffect Outfitters only met 60% of the specified criteria. Most of the
differences are small but they make a big difference as far as the safety and welfare of our
firefighters is concerned. The specifications required a "Thumb in cuff" feature which keeps
the sleeve cuff from being pulled up exposing the wrist. This provides extra protection from
burns around the wrist. Another requirement is for the bunker coat to have "Tails" which
will protect the lower back from burns while bent over. This is an important feature since a
good portion of firefighting is done from a crawling position. The specifications also
required gear that meets the "Blood Borne Pathogen Standard" that will protect the
firefighters from exposure to diseases carried by the blood of a patient encountered at a
car wreck or structure fire. Rescue Concepts' gear as well as Lake Effects' gear does not
meet this standard, nor does it meet the criteria on the "moisture barrier". Neither bidder
met the labeling requirements or a "Liner Locator" device, which allows a supervisor to
visually see if a set of gear has its thermal liner in place.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget X
Other
~i -
~~~lgH~/JeÆ~
Account Number 001-9003-532.61-20
S~~d~~
. ~d ~ Finance Director
~~~
City Manager Signature
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
These may appear to be small items, but they were included in the specifications because
they are important for the safety and welfare of our firefighters.
Staff feels the product offered by Rescue Concepts and Lakeffect Outfitters does not
compare to what is currently in service. The bid submitted by Dooley Tackaberry met
100% of the specifications. They are offering the brand of protective clothing the Fire
Department has used for the past five years with overall satisfaction and with only a few
repairs required. Using the same brand of protective clothing ensures uniformity in
appearance and care of the garments. Additionally, if the garment is damaged, the
individual components (coat or trousers) can be replaced from on hand stock and still be
compatible if they are of the same brand. The clothing is custom fitted allowing for more
mobility and less fatigue to the firefighters, as well as giving them optimum protection while
fighting fires.
Recommendation: To award the bid for bunker gear to Dooley Tackaberry, Inc. in the
amount of $21 ,998.
[
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Paae of
~
.....
~
U1
U1
W
0,
o
~
.....
.OJ
U1
(j)
--J
<.0
o
~
N
.....
(c
CO
--J
(:x¡
o
~
,þ.
,þ.
Ò1
.....
CO
o
,þ.
~
o
~
r-
..... .....
OJ OJ
CD CD
~ Q)
0)
C
::J
'"
CD
..,
"'C
Q)
::J
éiÏ
~
OJ
'"N
OJ
o
o
o
~
OJ
"0
w
w
~
o
~
CO
"0
--J
N
o
o
~
.....
OJ
W
U1
CO
.....
o
0)
C
::J
'"
CD
..,
("')
o
Q)
-
en
~
.....
o
'"N
--J
W
0,
o
("')
o :::c
::J CD
(") en
CD (")
"C C
éiÏCD
~
.....
.0
U1
W
,þ.
0,
o
or
c ~
~CD
éDæ:
ëil ~
~
.....
N
(c
N
U1
(:x¡
o
-i
Q)
(")
'"
Q) ~
gQ.
~~
~
N
p>
.....
U1
co
<.0
,þ.
-i
o
øQr
..,
o "T1
C ::;"
"C CD
0)0)
ë:§
0",
OCD
I ..,
~ø
U1CD
Q)
..,
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
"- Department: Public Works Department
Council Meeting Date: 1/10/00
Subject: Vacate a Portion of a Sanitary Sewer Easement located Agenda Number:
on the Thornhill Drive Right-of-Way; Lots 3 and 4, Block 1,
Thornbridge South Addition; Tract 9A, S, Richardson Survey; and
Timber Drive Right-of-Way - Ordinance No. 2442
PW 2000-01
An existing 15-foot wide sanitary sewer easement is located along the west right-of-way
line of Thornhill Drive; diagonally across Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 of Thornbridge South; Tract
9A, S. Richardson Survey; and the eastern end of Timber Drive right-of-way. The property
owners of these properties are planning on selling Lot 3, Block 1 for a homesite. They are
requesting that the 15-foot sanitary sewer easement be vacated and abandoned.
The sanitary sewer main has been reconstructed and the developer has dedicated
additional easements, as required with the plat for Thornbridge South Addition.
RECOMMENDATION: To approve Ordinance No. 2442.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
~
4l
Account Number
Sufficient Funds AvallaDle
Finance Director
"-
I
~c::~
City Manager Signature
Page 1 of _
_._,---,._-~~------_._._-----'-_..~---
ORDINANCE NO. 2442
WHEREAS, there exists a 15-toot sanitary sewer easement located on the Thornhill
Drive right-ot-way; Lots 3 & 4, Block 1 ot Thornbridge South Addition; Tract 9A, Sid Richardson
Survey; and the eastern end ot Timber Drive right-ot-way to the City ot North Richland Hills; and
WHEREAS, the easement is described in Volume 9846, Pg. 617; and
WHEREAS, the existing sanitary sewer main is no longer in use; and
WHEREAS, a sanitary sewer main has been reconstructed and the developer, as
required with the plat tor Thornbridge South Addition, has dedicated additional easements; and
WHEREAS, the City and the owners agree that the said 15-toot sanitary sewer
easement should be released and the dedication ot such easement vacated; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1.
The dedication ot that certain 15-toot sanitary sewer easement located on the Thornhill
Drive right-ot-way; Lots 3 & 4, Block 1 ot Thornbridge South Addition; Tract 9A, Sid Richardson
Survey; and the eastern end ot Timber Drive right-ot-way to the City ot North Richland Hills,
Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 9846, Page 617; be and is hereby, vacated in
tavor ot the owners.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day ot January, 2000.
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson, City Secretary
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
------~----->_._-----~"...-_..~--_..-
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF EASEMENT
~ ~)IÝ. f!t::::: L '- am the current ownetand r~.ible party for 'he property located a._
_ _ ~___~ ~ . ~ described as . . '. ~dltion. Lot ,
Block . I am hereby requesting th~ release of a previously dedicated easement. Thft:'proposed release is
_ more particularly described as follows: .. , I .
t' -...
(describe the Improvements by size. material, location and Intended purpose}
. Sþ~ /}rr¡1c7TE-D Pi et" At t:kr6..s.
ro¡f ~'~U)SR L/H€·- GA-SÆNJJí~'-
0 ApprcMtcI u North Richland.tfitts
eubmltted
~-D Authorized ~.p.....ntallve (Print Name)
Approved as
noted Tille
Dale Telephone Signature
0 Approved as Southwestern Bell Telephone D Approved as Tx Utilities (On)
8UbmIUed submitted
Authorized Repreientative (Print Name) AuthOrized Representabve (Prtnt Name)
0 Approved as 0 Approved as
noted Title noted TiU!.. .
0.18 Telephone SIgnature Date - T elephooe Signatute
0 Approved as Cabl. Company 0 Approved as ,.. Tx Utllltl.. (Electric)
euOmItted suoinitled -
Aulhoril8Cl Representative (~ri.nt Name) Authorized Represep~tivt (Print Name)
0 Approved II D Aøproved as
no1ed TiU. noltid TItle
r. . I .
Date Telephone Signature Date TeJeøhone Signature
FIELD NOTES FOR: 15.0 FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BE ABANDONED
BEING A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE S. RICHARDSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT ON. 1266
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. AND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 20. BLOCK 4, THORNBRIDGE,
PHASE I. AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS,
SAID POINT BEING LOCATED 35.50 FEET SOUTH 00 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 44 SECONDS
WEST AND 150.00 FEET SOUTH 89 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST OF THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, HOLDER-SMITHFIELD ESTATES, AN ADDITION TO THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS, ACCORDING TO PLAT
RECORDED IN VOLUME 388-34, PAGE 57, PLAT RECORDS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST 15.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST 287.98 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST 193.44 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 15.18 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 79 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST 177.65 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST 296.94 FEET TO
THE PLACE OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 6967.5 SQUARE FEET OF LAND,
MORE OR LESS.
~ ~~ ,"- ~'
NUMBER DIRECTION
11 589' 35' 44 HE
L2 N02'03' 14 "E
TIMBER ORNE
10' R,O,V ,
OWNER: B,H." L JOINT VENTURE
lOT 12
HOlDER-SIAITHF1ElD
ESTATES
V, J88-J4. P. 57
P,R,T,C.T.
ZONED 0-1
LEGENO 1. F,
. IRON PIN
o IRON PIPE
A IlOl& D'ARC STAKE
C CONCRtTE MO/4
-X-;(- FENCE
----- POV.iRLINE
- T - T - TELLPHOHE LINE
-CATV - CABI E TELEVIllION
BHADtD AREA
DE~IONATU CONCRETE
N
-J
-Z3
.-----.-
EXHIBIT B
LOT 20, BLOCK 4
_BRIDGE
PHASE I
CAlI, A, SUOE J7J
P.R,T,C.T.
.."
DISTANCE
15.00
15.18
I
PROPOSEO I
LOT 1. BLOCK I
THORNBRIDGE SOUTH I
'/..~1
\'.'\
1"'.:>''\ c., .
",1 O~"
I
I
I
PROPOSEO I
I Lor 2. BLOCK I I
THORNBR,OCE SOUTH 0
L__________________~
r--------------
I EXISTING
I WATER LINE EASEMENT
I VOL. IOOt7, PC, 2010 I
I (TO II( ABANDONED PROPOSED
LOT J. BLOCK I
., I _ _ _ _ THORNBRIOCE souru I
~S79'õi;41"----- I
: N]~¡--
1 W 19J.44 #.Æ
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT I
VOL 9846. PG. 617
TO BE ABANDONED I
PROPOSEO
LOT4, BLOCK I
THORNBR'OCE SOUTH
;1;
11 ~
LOT 1. BLOCK I
THORNBRIOCE
CA¡J, ~oI: J1J
P,R,T.C,T,
-r-
------
I
I
I I
I PROPOSEO
I LOT '. BLOCK J
THORNBRIOCE SOUTH
I
I
I
I
IL
~. EXIST';;-
L(~ :.s ~'~ ~MT.
I
I
: STRATfORD
I DRIVE
I
I
I
I I
~I
:i I
Ic~
I~ã I
I...
I~ I
r I
I
I
I
I
--
ql/ :5. R/~HÆ/:.D6.0N 6UR.V£!
I
01···.
i~l~
o LOYD BRANsOM SURVEYORS INC.
,...~..,,'~,-'1.:"~'b. CHAHLES B HOOKS JR
1 ~~ C) \*5 T E ~~1.<.J\~ FiEGISl ERED PR(JFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
-'_~_ .0\ ~ 1028 NORH SYLVANIA AVE.
..£~~~~~_fffõõ:E§~jf}. FT, WORTH, TEXAS 76111
<-'~o",,3946~.;',... ~W 834-3477
~-tD"~S~;lS',, .
. /~¡:' 'I
..
q(ì- /11t.M
DATE Ob -zq-19
J
:'
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
',,--
Department: Public Works Deoartment
Council Meeting Date: 1/1 0/00
Subject: Vacate a Portion of a Waterline Easement located on the
Thornhill Drive Right-of-Way; Lot 3, Block 1, Thornbridge
South; Tract 9A, S. Richardson Survey; and Timber Drive
Right-of-Way - Ordinance No. 2441
PW 2000-02
Agenda Number:
An existing 15-foot wide waterline easement is located along the east right-of-way line of
Thornhill Drive; diagonally across Lot 3, Block 1 of Thornbridge South; Tract 9A, S.
Richardson Survey; and the eastern end of Timber Drive right-of-way. The property
owners of these properties are planning on selling Lot 3, Block 1 for a homesite. They are
requesting that the 15-foot waterline easement be vacated and abandoned.
The water main has been reconstructed and the developer has dedicated additional
easements, as required with the plat for Thornbridge South Addition,
RECOMMENDATION: To approve Ordinance No. 2441.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Revi w
Account Number
Sufficient Funds AvallaCle
~
Finance Director
,A9~~
City Man gers¡gna: -"
Page 1 of _
ORDINANCE NO. 2441
WHEREAS, there exists a 15-foot waterline easement located on the Thornhill Drive
right-of-way; Lot 3, Block 1 of Thornbridge South Addition; Tract 9A, Sid Richardson Survey;
and the eastern end of Timber Drive right-of-way to the City of North Richland Hills; and
WHEREAS, the easement is described in Volume 10097, Page 2060; and
WHEREAS, the existing waterline is no longer in use; and
WHEREAS, the existing water main has been reconstructed and the developer, as
required with the plat for Thornbridge South Addition, has dedicated additional easements; and
WHEREAS, the City and the owners agree that the said 15-foot waterline easement
should be released and the dedication of such easement vacated; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1.
The dedication of that certain 15-foot waterline easement located on the Thornhill
Drive right-of-way; Lot 3, Block 1 of Thornbridge South Addition; Tract 9A, Sid Richardson
Survey; and the eastern end of Timber Drive right-of-way to the City of North Richland Hills,
Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 10097, Page 2060; be and is hereby, vacated in
favor of the owners.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day of January, 2000.
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson, City Secretary
R
/'
c·
- -"- - --
- - - ---
- ---.- -
- - -- -. - - - - - - - - - . - - .
---. ---
. ..--
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF EASEMENT
I. Jõ ~~ Vi 8:;: ';: l &. am tho curren' owno, and ,.spon,';blo party for the property located 0'_
SDLrrH. _ _ ~ L-~ _ Jð described as ' . Addition, Lot ,
Block . I am hereby requesting th~release of a previously dedicated easement. ThJt~proposed release is
__ more particularly described as fol!ows:
(describe the Improvements by size, material,location and intended purpose)
SþS /frr¡1c1TS'fj A 8J.. ^ M,r8..s
PiJrt
Wit-TIE A- L,NE 6¡}5~~~N'-
0 Approved as North Richtand..tfills
submitted
Authorized Representative (Print Name)
'-0 Approved as "
noted Tille
Date Telephone Signature
0 ~ovedas Southwestern Ball Telephone 0 Approved as T)G UWtle. (GI.)
submitted submitted
Authorized Representative (Print Name) Authorized Repre~ntabve (Print Name)
0 Approved as D Approved as
noted Title noted TiUe .
Date Telephone Signature Date Telephone Signalure
0 Approved as Cable Company D Approved as Tx Utilities (Electric)
submitted submilted
Authorized Representallve (Ptínt Name) AuthoriZ8d Represe~~tiv8 (Print Name)
0 Approved as D Approved as
noted Tille naltKI Title
o.te Telephone Signature Date Telephone Signature
, ')
--- fL.
~
FIELD NOTES FOR: WA TER LINE EASEMENT TO BE ABANDONED
BEING A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE S. RICHARDSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT ON. 1266
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THi: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, THORNBRIDGE, PHASE I,
AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS,
ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 373, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT
COUNTY, TEXAS:
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST 279.19 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST 248.91 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 44.55 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 79 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST 167.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST 5.09 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 79 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST 20.36 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST 261.14 FEET:
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST 15.00 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 6378.53 SQUARE FEET OF LAND,
MORE OR LESS.
~~~~~
.;«- ..:\ ç. ...."...., ~~"
./ ' " ""ST~" .
, ~~.",,& \*'" i}.... Of'
-J/f.(., ~\~.
._-j~,---_.._-_.._.._?:~......
\"" ..º,~~~~ L...~~..ê~.~..QQ.~ªdB.;.
.\1..., ...¡:
\\J ;"'Ý 3946 -'>. "f,/
\~ ( '. ,0,., 0-.;;7·':<"-t":
.'/ 'of. ·,,'h's....\ ,.' r. .,1
\t..-,.I\~";"'::'~';~<i':;~~~·
.:"~ .. ...~~-.{/..
-·,,~~W
x
~ =E ,". 50
NUMBER DIRECTION
L 1 N87"54'05"E
L2 NOO'05'44"E
L3 579'07' 41"E
L4 589'35'44"E
TIMBER DRIVE
110' R,O.W,
L1
OWNER; B,H.'" l. JOINT VENTUR[
LOT 12
HOLDER-SMITHfiELD
ESTATES
V, J88-J4, P. 57
P,R.T.C,T,
ZONED 0-1
,-'"
LEG~ND 1, r '
. IROII PIN
o IROII PIPL
Å 101~ O'AHC STAKE
o CDNCHETE 1.10'1
-X-X- FENCE
_ . - . - POv.6::ft LINE
- T -T - TtLLPtlONE I.".E
-CATV- CAlLE IHkVI.101I
5U,,0&:.0 AlitA D
DE"IONATU CONt;HETE '[3
I PROPOSED
'LOT Z, BLOCK , I
THORNSRIOCE SOUTH
L___________________
r--------------
: WATER UNE EASEMENT
I VOL 10097, PG. 2060 I
1 TO BE ABANDONED
W.$p 579'07'41" I
I VPPPP~þ~,961
J. _ _ N79·07'4I,ÇLL/W(L/...tZ:Z/7~
1 - - 24 ~L/
I PRDPOSro- - _ _ _ 8.91
1 TH~C¡:Nã',¡':¿X:~TH
EXISTlNC
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
VOL 9846, PC, 6'7
TO BE ABANDONED
DISTANCE
44.55
5,09
20.36
15.00
I'
11.
I..;
,:;
,.
I~
,.
e
,-
I
"
~"...'.T¡"."..'.".".-,... :.",.,.
!~\
EXHIBIT B
LOI 20, BLOCK 4
THORNBRIOCE
PHASE I
CAlI. A, SLIDE 373
P.R.T,C,T.
ill
LOT 1. BLOCK 1
THORNBRIOCE
PHASE I
CAlI, A, SlIO( ,)13
P,R,T,C,T,
I
I
PROPOSED I
LOT I, BLOCK ,
THORNBRIOCE SOUTH I
' ,~1
\",\
1!1'.:>''\~· '
..¡.1 O~'
PROPOSED
LOT 4, BLOCK ,
THORNBRIOCE SOUTH
-r-
i
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
~I
01
::ul
ZI
~I
FI
01
::UI
~I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N1 LJ
~rø
-1ãtüN~
I
I
I
1 I
I PROPOSEO
I LOT I. BLOCK 3
THORNSRJOCE SOUTH
I
I
I
I
-J
EXISTlNC
~' CAS LINE ESIIT.
I
I
I
I
I
I
T/Z.4C.-T Cf4 ~. f!./~ ~(lI/oL""
I
~.""''-'''. lOYl> BRANSOM SURVEYORS INC.
'. ./ ,c:. of': ! '~"" CIIAfIl ES ß I lOOKS JFl
i:t-'r'·, ':1.; ",< '1'ó'~ F!EGI~IUi[D l'fiOFESSIONAL LAND SUnVEYOn
&... ,Q-v )II\. ())\ ~1l)2B I~OIITH SYLVANIA AVE
If. "'.',. ¡'IJ.Šfi,'ï4~'ÖKS,}:.} Fl, W(¡IITH, 1 EXAS 76111
"L .' '~16 .' ,4 034·~ If (
'i9~ I" ;:'M {¡1,.Z</-'fI
(
..
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
,-. Department: Public Works Department
Subject: Aporove 1999/2000 City Street Overlav ProQram
Council Meeting Date: 1/10/00
PW 2000-03
Agenda Number:
The proposed 1999/2000 City Street Overlay Program consists of 12 streets shown on the
attached list. The standard selection process was used to select the 12 streets. The
Assistant Public Works Director and Street Superintendent have personally reviewed the
streets in the field.
The estimated budget for 1999/2000 (including budget surplus from previous year) is
shown below.
1999/2000 Approved Budget
Budget surplus from last year
Total Budget for 1999/2000
$399,450
50.000
$449,450
*The budget surplus includes savings from last year (1998/99).
"--
The estimated cost for the subgrade repairs, partial curb and gutter replacement, asphalt
milling, and 2-inch asphalt overlay is $401,524.74.
The 1999/2000 Overlay Program was presented to the Capital Improvements Program
Committee on December 9, 1999, and the program was approved as presented.
Recommendation: To approve the 1999/2000 City Street Overlay Program.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
¿:JJ
ance Director
'-
~~ ~
C~ignature
Page 1 of _
Public Works Department
Street Division
Memo
MEMO TO: Gregory W. Dickens
Public Works Director
FROM: Jimmy Cates
Public Works Superintendent/Streets
DATE: November 29,1999
SUBJECT: PROPOSED 1999/2000 CITY STAFF OVERLAY PROGRAM
Attached is the Public Works Department's proposed overlay program. The program
consists of 12 streets. The approved 1999/2000 FY budget is $399,450 with a
surplus of $50,000 from the 1998/1999 FY.
Streets #1 (Smithfield Road), #2 (Arthur Drive), and #3 (Shirley Drive) will have their
subgrade re-stabilized and compacted as well as a new asphalt surface laid. The
total length of street on the list is 2.25 miles or 4.50 lane miles.
The second list shows the condition rating of the worst streets in the City for 1999
along with a brief explanation of current and scheduled projects for the streets.
If I can answer any questions, please let me know.
. Page 1
UJ Q)
..J C)
..J ca
:;: .5 :a:
"'ES
CCCl)
-.ï:-
Z en.-
.."" ã) U
..... Q) >-
..J ...,Q
:I:èñ~
o ë 1; g
-Q»O
a:::EO~
t::u~
:I: ca < Q)
I- c.:¡:....
a::: Q) J:
o c; N
Z ~-g
LL 0 en
03:&.
CJ e
>-=0.
1-J:1
_ ::J
o a..
-
C )
C )
b
CI)
ò
z~
>-
C'O
3:
~
....
C'O
Q.
ë -c
e! c:
.... UJ
C'O -c
I- C'O
.c: ( )
t 0
o -
-gz -g
o :c ( ) 0
~ ~.~ ~
ã;D::èsã;
¡¡:::-' ¡¡::
:55!5:5
'E 5 €'E
cncc<cn
(0
N
M
C")
C")
0)
N
tß-
(0
N
M
C")
C")
0)
N
tß-
I/)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0)
....
tß-
....
C")
M
C")
C")
0)
tß-
(0
<C!
(0
(0
(0.
N
(0
(0
<ri
(0
(0.
N
'V
N
X
o
o
o.
....
co
C")
..
N
(0
C'!
C")
C")
o
a)
I/)
tß-
o
o
o
o
r--
a)
N
tß-
o
o
o
I/)
N
ci
N
tß-
o
o
o
I/)
~
0)
tß-
(0
(0
<ri
(0
C")
I/)
o
o
o
o
r--
N
r--
N
X
o
o
0)
C")
'V
Qj
~
èñ
ï::
C'O
( ) ( )
Q. >
(¡j ï::
( ) ,È: 0
,È: 0 ~
o c: 0
:-,C'Oèñ
~E-c
.: 3: ã;
ë55~¡¡:
..
C")
r--
0)
....
C")
'¢
..¡
C")
....
tß-
....
r--
cD
0)
C")
I/)
r--
tß-
I/)
I'-:
co
'¢
C")
co
I/)
tß-
(0
0)
0)
'¢
o
r-:
....
tß-
'¢
I/)
I/)
I/)
cñ
co
co
co
co
r--.
C")
....
C")
x
o
o
....
....
'¢
'¢
'¢
'¢
0)
....
0)
C")
o
r--
....
tß-
r--
0)
0)
I/)
0)
IL'i
C")
tß-
I/)
(0
<ri
'¢
.....
C")
N
tß-
N
C")
M
.....
co
N
.....
tß-
r--
co
co
co
N
C")
C")
C")
M
C")
.....
'V
....
C")
x
o
o
N.
I/)
'¢
z
( )
>
ï::
o
( )
~
è3
~ Q)
~ en
ë5 §
-C( )cn
c: ,~ ã3
C'O .... >
:E 0 'c:
u( )o
ë2ro5!
.c: -c .-
t c: ....
o ~ §
Z"CI)
I/)
C")
(0
cD
'¢
C")
a)
o
N
tß-
0)
(0
<ri
I/)
0)
a::i
C")
tß-
r--
I/)
I/)
r--
o.
I/)
N
tß-
N
....
.....
co
co
C")
....
tß-
I/)
<C!
(0
(0
r--
r-:
....
co
I'-:
r--
r--
'¢.
'¢
....
C")
x
o
o
C")
(0
'¢
-c
C'O
o
D::
-c
C'O
o
D::
-c
ã;
¡¡::
( )
~
~
( )
( ) >
c: 'C: ( )
C'OO>
...J .¡:
c:o 0
~
:c ë..-c
en ~ 8
-0C: .c: 3:
- E
g5.2
:::icnQ.
(0
co
co
....
....
C")
N
'¢
N
tß-
(0
N
M
(0
0).
N
C")
tß-
C")
r--
r-:
....
N.
....
N
tß-
C")
I/)
..0
'V
r--.
....
....
tß-
C")
I/)
M
I/)
I/)
....
N
co
co
cD
co
r--
C"Î
....
C")
x
o
o
....
....
co
'¢
r--
r--
I/)
cD
(0
C'!.
....
co
N
tß-
0)
(0
<ri
I/)
0)
a::i
C")
tß-
r--
I/)
I/)
r--
o
IL'i
N
tß-
N
.....
....
co
co.
C")
....
tß-
....
C")
M
C")
o
cD
N
co
r--
r-:
r--
'¢
'¢
....
C")
x
o
o
C").
....
co
'¢
-c -c
C'O C'O
o 0
D:: D::
en en
( ) ( )
c: c:
.... ....
C'O :-,.s
U5C'Ocn
ã3:Š:ã3
æ C'O 'È:
...J( )O
:-,...J
C'O CI E:
-cc:o
= "¡:: (J
oa.C:
:J:cn:::i
co
o
(0
cD
'¢
N
cñ
0)
N
tß-
C")
o
o
co
0)
r-:
....
tß-
I/)
C")
C")
r--
I/)
....
....
tß-
co
(0
cO
o
'¢.
(0
tß-
co
0)
0)
0)
o
a::i
N
r--
(0
cO
(0
o
N
....
C")
x
o
o
(0
co
'¢
( )
u
e!
....
( )
I-
3:
( )
( ) '~
c: 0
C'O -c
...J C'O
C'O ( )
'E-c :2
C'O c: -
>:-, ( )
( ) ...J c:
:;:C-c~
o C'O C'O en
CC&&êii
( ) .c
:2....0) '80 g..5
ã:i1ñ
€~O)en
o C'O :2 e
Z:J:D::ü
0)
C")
....
cD
....
(0
r-:
....
C")
tß-
C")
I/)
0)
(0
C")
a::i
....
tß-
(0
o
-<i
N
co
....
....
tß-
(0
'¢
..0
'¢
I/)
(0
tß-
N
-.r:
....
....
C'!.
o
C")
'¢
-.r:
....
....
....
Ñ
....
C")
x
C")
....
(0
0)
'¢
o
....
co
C")
(0
0)
o
r-:
C")
C")
tß-
(0
N
cD
r--
'V
a)
.....
tß-
C")
r--
r-:
C")
I/)
N
....
tß-
C")
I/)
o
'V
0)
cD
tß-
C")
o
o
I/)
'V.
N
C")
co
co
cD
C")
N
Ñ
....
C")
x
o
I/)
(0
o
I/)
( )
u
C'O
ã:
E
C'O
.c: ( )
-c c:
ë5 C'O
_ ...J
'E ~
C'O 0
'(ij ¡¡; ü
~:; ã3
E ~ ~.È:
C'O en:> 0
.c:( ):>c:
g':ec:C'O
,- ü.~ E
~-cà53:
~~o~
....
....
r--
o
M
I/)
o
cD
.....
C")
tß-
0)
<C!
(0
I/)
0)
a::i
C")
tß-
r--
I/)
I/)
r--
o
IL'i
N
tß-
N
....
....
co
co
C")
....
tß-
....
co
r-:
N
0)
cD
C")
co
r--
r-:
r--
'¢.
'¢
....
C")
x
o
o
C")
....
I/)
I/) 10
r-- r--
-<i ooi
N N
I/) ~
.... ....
o 0
'V ..".
tß- ~
0) 10
<C! ,...
.... ooi
r-- N
'¢ ~
1/). ....
N 0
tß- ..".
~
r-- Q)
I/) ..".
..0 0
0) N
C") 10
cD Ò
..... ,...
tß- N
~
N CD
.... N
<ri ooi
r-- 0
o C!-
O) ....
tß- M
....
~
.... ,...
co N
r-: cO
N ..".
N ,...
(0 a)
'¢ CD
N
co CD
r-- co
r-: sri
N 10
0) co
N a)
M
....
C")
x
o
I/)
co
C")
I/)
N
....
c
o
;:
u
~
...
-
en
c
o
u
C )
0::
,:j
~
o
I-
-
c
C )
E
C )
>
ft
a..
..
12 DEe 17 1.:30:14 F.... ø. No: 0028 MAP: _I .cr.t....... "'-CJ1! ___ .......ttI
1 - Smithfield Road
~..J "¡-1
" 1"'" J:: ï I
w ,. E ~ ~1.,þ.RR...-m I"r\."l·
\ '1[\ L ~
, ':_U~. ~
5 ;.~ . iill I
~
:II ~ t -D-'
, BURSFB' R[ . ~ l l-
i ~ -= - ---=D.
-:~ 8; -rr t ;- 7 ~H11 ( ~ ~
.E=r._ ~ , -L I JJ J- -r1 - :=f--- 1
~ k- ~[~J 7 rr~ ~8Ir ~""'--\~'" ~
.... (~ \ ~'L -. rï=LU 1:1? f--,::..- " '9 '->z
t:.. t:;; - Ii: ~~ L1"C'" ,.... -,'" ë:;
0: HI¡... I".J,..R pR. t::J ~ 9 ~ ~ z~)'. ~
o ~ IAJ \.-~ ~'.Ál - u.
~i ,. 6 -±::I:;~ wL- \' ~
~ r -Jr- - T1 .... J \.Y/ 8
~ ~ ~ U CHAP A~~~ Tf ~ .../:8 Inl)'1..- ~ f
ª I ':t::: -1:3. Ÿ , I. IT 11
> 'w::¡ ¡f?-- sE ~ ~ --!-;1Jc.¡TlES BLVd.
5 .,¡ -"ÇJ ~Tád 'Bl-1t~l1 '-- L.L::;
J 11~~~sr~3
~-~'''rr~B'9~ ~ - ~ 12
~ /?f -~i;t,ir~) ~l'q~
~ //t [mi\¡4 ~ ~0 Iq I c:: !
~' ¡ : I I lJJ-~ f::.\ \\1: T 1'r[:1
~ /~ I ~lIi:<'C'" _>: 9 /
,.-' . f ~1-- _...II ,1' ,1
_. ~ ; ; LOOP 820 11 1:1 ~,h"" ,,()ù.. ~-/ :.b
----1-=>~,'8 ~-' o:J1 '1I1ì ~i:J. I - ~.~ ~~ 1 ~
¿ ¿ ,,' \.lJ rQ f-fì t--~ 0, I J"
." __ ~~~~ .-.è ~
'>'"'''' ~ ~ ~ - I w.v)..!: ~ -~Fk~:7 ,r
\V ~~::::::) ~I :21.J~ ~ I '¡ 'j,/
... ........ rY ~ ~ ¡ ,
!', LL...."'" 'G~tENVIE.WD~"':" ,It;
~ lUll;) ~~:t ..... =-.rn 'IT ç:::¡ ~~í
: . ~ · "" t.) tk ...
~p- (( J=<t.~~.
~~ I f-Ilt:/t-
'}fl L{[( ¡., >_~
. :l~..i #~
o¡.~,.#
-1:"
Legend:
2 - Arthur Drive
3 - Shirley Drive
4 - Field Stone Drive
5 - Glendale Drive
6 - Lincolnshire Lane
7 - Plumwood Drive
8 - Spring Lea Way
9 - Northridge Boulevard
10 - Ridgetop Road
11 - Buckingham Trail
12 - O'Brian Way
1999/2000
City Street Overlay Program
N.RTH
RICHLAND
HILLS
Depar1ment of Inform.tion Service. . Geogr.phic Infonn.tion S.,.œm. 101S1
CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS
PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
September 24, 1999
œC1 ;¡j¡!r'$_¡~"T:~8T1NG"NODE1:ië;ç;¡.1ï¡¡)':¡ ,~{<,r;6t:Jj;;0¥'ENDINßmøD~1;x~: ;:eROPOSED IMPROYEM~
27 Meadow Rd/6700-6900 Meadow Rd-Chapman Dr Meadow Rd-Hightower Dr 1999 City Staff Overlay
29 Green Ridge Tr/7000 Green Ridge Tr-Hightower Dr Green Ridge Tr-Windhaven Rd 1999 City Staff Overlay
35 Sudbury Way/6300-6469 Sudbury Way-Dorchester Tr Sudbury Way-Sudbury Way 1994 CIP Bond
36 Snider St/6500 Snider St-Main St Snider St-Dead End Routine Maintenance
36 Douglas Ln/7417-7600 Douglas Ln-Douglas Ln Douglas Ln-Hanover Ln 1994 CIP Bond
36 Rufe Snow Dr/71 00-7400 Rufe Snow Dr-Starnes Rd Rufe Snow Dr-Fair Meadows Dr 1994 CIP Bond
37 Douglas Ln/7000-7124 Douglas Ln-Hightower Dr Douglas Ln-Douglas Ln 5 Year Reconstruction
37 Ridgetop Rd/6700 Ridgetop Rd-Rufe Snow Dr Ridgetop Rd-Crosstimbers Ln 1999 City Staff Overlay
~ .I!3&i Smithfield Rd/8()()()..81 00 )¡µ~. .' ~ Smithfield Rd-North Tarrant Pkwy Smithfield Rd-Bursey Rd.;$oJ\il,'i... 2000 City Staff Overlav .~
38 Rufe Snow Drn100-7600 Rufe Snow Dr-N, of North Park Dr Rufe Snow Dr-Starnes Rd 1994 CIP Bond
39 Tourist Dr/5600-6000 Tourist Dr-Bewley St Tourist Dr-Denton Hwy 1994 CIP Bond
39 Center St/6500 Center St-Main St Center St-Dead End Routine Maintenance
39 Crosstimbers Ln/7000 Crosstimbers Ln-Hightower Dr Crosstimbers Ln-Ridgetop Rd 1999 City Staff Overlay
39 Rufe Snow Dr/7600-7800 Rufe Snow Dr-Bursey Rd Rufe Snow Dr-N of Highlawn Terr 1994 CIP Bond
40 Grove St/4000-4828 Grove St-Lazy Ln Grove St-Culd 1994 CIP Bond
41 Bursey Rd/7800-7955 Bursey Rd-Bursey Rd Bursey Rd-Smithfield Rd 5 Year Reconstruction
42 Rufe Snow Drn600 Rufe Snow Dr-N of Highlawn Terr Rufe Snow Dr-N of Norht Park Dr 1994 CIP Bond
42 Janetta Drn700 Janetta Dr-Roberta Dr Janetta Dr-Dead End 1999 City Staff Overlay
43 Sudbury Way/6446-6469 Sudbury Way-Sudbury Way Sudbury Way-Little Ranch Rd 1994 CIP Bond
43 Rumfield Rd/8400-8000 Rumfield Rd-David Blvd Rumfield Rd-Eden Rd 1994 CIP Bond
.. .'43J. Arthur Drn800 . Arthur Dr-Smithfield Rd Arthur Dr-Dead End ", , 2000 City Staff Overlay 'f~>.",,~._II.
43 Briley Dr/6900-7100 Briley Dr-Vance Rd Briley Dr-Blaney Ave 1994 CIP Bond
44 Newman Drn900-8000 Newman Dr-Davis Blvd Newman Dr-Smithfield Rd Routine Maintenance
44 Douglas Ln/7812-7900 Douglas Ln-Rolling Ridge Dr Douglas Ln-Bursey Rd 1994 CIP Bond
~ ~ Shirley Dr/6250-6300 Shirley Ln-Newman Dr Shirley Ln-Pearl St 2000 City Staff Overlay . 1P --
Shady Grove Rd/81 00-8400 Shady Grove Rd-E of Indian Knoll Tr Shady Grove Rd-Franklin Ct 5 Year Reconstruction
~ ~;~ field Stone DrnSOO Field Stone Dr-North Richland Blvd Field Stone Dr-Circle Dr N 2000 City Staff Overlay.:à-.:II ¡ 16-
45 Blaney Ave/41 00-4600 Blaney Ave-Grapevine Hwy Blaney Ave-Holiday Ln 1994 CIP Bond
45 Buck St/7500-7700 Buck St-Dead End Buck St-Hewitt Dr 1999 City Staff Overlay
45 Amundson Dr/8400-8908 Amundson Dr-Amundson Dr Amundson Dr-Walter Rd 5 Year Reconstruction
46 Wyoming Tr/4800-5100 Wyoming Tr-Grapevine Hwy Wyoming Tr-Culd 1994 CIP Bond
46 Shady Grove Rd/7500-8100 Shady Grove Rd-Franklin Ct Shady Grove Rd-Smithfield Rd 5 Year Reconstruction
46 Stewart Dr/8700 Stewart Dr-Simmons Rd Stewart Dr-Chilton Dr Routine Maintenance
~ 46, Glendale Dr/6800-6900 Glendale Dr-Sunrise Dr Glendale Dr-Sunset Rd , 2000 City Staff Overlay " ·',~d"iI --
46 Nancy Ln/4700-5000 Nancy Ln-Northeast Loop 820 Nancy Ln-Maplewood Ave 5 Year Reconstruction
... 48 Lincolnshire Ln/6900-7000 Lincolnshire Ln-Southhampton Dr Lincolnshire In-Wakefield Rd 2000 City Staff Overlay. --~'!"W:-:-..I1
þo 48 Plumwood Drn200-7300 Plumwood Dr-Holiday ln Plumwood Dr-Starnes Rd 2000 City Staff Overlay ""'. 16-
48 Meadow Creek Rd/6800-6900 Meadow Creek Rd-North Forty Rd Meadow Creek Rd-Hightower Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
. 48 . Spring lea Wayn400-7432 Spring lea Way-S of Lincoln Dr ' ," Spring lea Way-Stames Rd 2000 City Staff Overlay ...
49 Kirk In/7500-9500 Kirk Ln-Kirk Rd Kirk Ln-Precinct Line Rd 5 Year Reconstruction
49 Cardinal Ln/8600-9033 Cardinal Ln-Cardinal Ln Cardinal Ln-Cardinal Ln 5 Year Roconstruction
.. 49 Northridge Blvd/5300-5333 Northridge Blvd-Harwood Rd Northridge Blvd-200'S of lynda Ln 2000 City Staff Overlay ;¡....
49 Susan Lee Ln/5100-5200 Susan Lee Ln-Lola Dr Susan Lee Ln-Maplewood Ave 1994 CIP Bond
49 Starnes Rd/8000-8300 Starnes Rd-Timberidge Dr Starnes Rd- Timberhill Dr 1999 City Staff Overlay
.... 50 Ridgetop Rd/6800 Ridgetop Rd-Crosstimbers ln Ridgetop Rd-Meadowview Terr 2000 City Staff Overlay ~
51 Susan Lee Ln/4700-5000 Susan Lee Ln-Maplewood Ave Susan Lee Ln-Northeast Loop 820 1994 CIP Bond
. 51 Buckingham Tr/6300-6400 Buckingham Tr-Mid Cities Blvd Buckingham Tr-OIdham PI 2000 City Staff Overlay !.t-
51 Mackey Dr/41 00-4400 Mackey Dr-Glenview Dr Mackey Dr-Briley Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
51 Greenwood Way/5400 Greenwood Way-Randol Dr Greenwood Way-Noreast Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
52 Little Ranch Rd/6700-6900 Little Ranch Rd-Chapman Dr Little Ranch Rd-Hightower Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
52 Galway Ln/5420-5500 Galway Ln-Emerald Hills Way Galway Ln-Galway Ln 5 Year Reconstruction
52 Yarmouth Ave/6200-6529 Yarmouth Ave-Mid Cities Blvd Yarmouth Ave-Newcastle PI 5 Year Reconstruction
, Cloyce Ct/4900-5032 Cloyce Ct-Northeast Loop 820 Cloyce Ct-Maplewood Ave 5 Year Reconstruction
Ii. .' Clay Hibbins Rd/8500-8800 Clay Hibbons Rd-Shady Grove Rd Clay Hibbins Rd-Keller City Limits Staff Overlay
LIST OF WORST STREETS
CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS
PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
September 24, 1999
OCI ",.'> ',,',,'d 11t./W' InÙ@¡¡}'~'L@'."" '!f"i)".·j'¡¡¡¡(;'!¡~STARTING;NODE;~ii1;;fij=1'; L;t:j',¥·,·.;::·,;;;¡r..~;;ENDING;NOD~'¡¡¡¡~0¡g; ..PROPOSEC:IMI?8o.W;M~
53 Shady Hollow Ln17300 Shady Hollow Ln-Starnes Rd Shady Hollow Ln-Windcrest Ct Staff Overlay
"" 53 O'Brian Way/8200 O'Brian Way-Newman Dr O'Brian Way-Cork Ln 2000 City Staff Overtay lit-
53 Clift SU6824-6900 Clift St-Amundson Dr Clift St-Dead End Staff Overlay
53 Ross Rd/6000 Ross Rd-Davis Blvd Ross Rd-200'N of College Cir Routine Maintenance
54 Cardinal Ln/8600-8700 Cardinal Ln-Cardinal Ln Cardinal Ln-Mid Cities Blvd 5 Year Reconstruction
54 Charles SU3500 Charles St-Onyx Dr S Charles St-Richland Plaza 5 Year Reconstrution
54 Kandy Ln17900-8000 Kandy Ln-Bursey Rd Kandy Ln-Continental Tr Staff Overlay
54 Harwick Ln/7100-7200 Harwick Ln-Yarmouth Ave Harwick Ln-Winchester Rd Staff Overlay
54 Rufe Snow Dr/4800-5100 Rufe Snow Dr-Northeast Loop 820 Rufe Snow Dr-Shauna Dr 1994 CIP Bond
54 Smithfield Rd/7900-8000 Smithfield Rd-Bursey Rd Smithfield Rd-N Green Valley Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
54 Redondo SU4500-4800 Redondo St-Briley Dr Redondo St-Marilyn Ln 1999 City Staff Overlay
54 Valley Dr/8000-8100 Valley Dr-Continental Tr Valley Dr-Bursey Rd 5 Year Reconstruction
54 Windhaven Rd17000-7300 Windhaven Rd-Hightower Dr Windhaven Rd-Starnes Rd Staff Overlay
55 Chatham Rd/7100-7200 Chatham Rd-Yarmouth Ave Chatham Rd-Buckingham Tr Staff Overlay
55 Continental Tr/7300-7424 Continental Tr-Dead End Continental Tr-Dead End 5 Year Reconstruction
55 Rufe Snow Dr/41 00-4200 Rufe Snow Dr-Mike Dr Rufe Snow Dr-Glenview Dr 1994 CIP Bond
56 Onyx Dr S/6236-6500 Onyx Dr S-Bonzer St Onyx Dr S-Billie Faye Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
56 Crestwood Cir E/5700-5900 Crestwood Cir E-Steeplewood Dr Crestwood Cir E-North Richland Blvd Staff Overlay
57 Chartwell SU6200-6400 Chartwell St-Diamond Loch E Chartwell St-Dawn Dr Staff Overlay
57 Rufe Snow Dr/51 00-5700 Rufe Snow Dr-RIR Tracks Rufe Snow Dr-Northeast Loop 820 ISTEA
57 Greendale CU6700-6736 Greendale Ct-Rufe Snow Dr Greendale Ct-Culd 1999 City Staff Overlay
57 Crane Rd/6500-6600 Crane Rd-Martin Dr Crane Rd-Main St 1994 CIP Bond
57 Shady Hollow CU7400 Shady Hollow Ct-Starnes Rd Shady Hollow Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
57 Weeping Willow Dr/9300 Weeping Willow Dr-Precinct Line Rd Weeping Willow Dr-Meandering Dr Staff Overlay
Valley View Drive/6500-9000 Valley View Dr-Crane Rd Valley View Dr-Martin Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
I North Tarrant Pkwy/9100-9200 North Tarrant Pkwy-Davis Blvd North Tarrant Pkwy-Precinct Line Rd County Road
57 Wanda Way/7000 Wanda Way-Meandering Dr Wanda Way-Weeping Willow Dr Staff Overlay
58 Ridgetop Rd/6900-7000 Ridgetop Rd-Windhaven Rd Ridgetop Rd-Meadowview Terr Staff Overlay
58 Meadow Park N/6900-7100 Meadow Park N-Meadow Oak Dr Meadow Park N-Meadow Park Blvd 5 Year Reconstruction
58 Daley Ave/4000-41 00 Daley Ave-Glenview Dr Daley Ave-Grapevine Hwy Staff Overlay
58 Windhaven Culd/7309 Wind haven Culd-Windhaven Rd Wind haven Culd-Culd Staff Overlay
58 Northfield Dr/7500-7700 Northfield Dr-Rum field Rd Northfield Dr-North field Park Staff Overlay
59 Lincoln Dr/7000-7116 Lincoln Dr-Windhaven Rd Lincoln Dr-Dead End Staff Overlay
59 Frankie B SU7500-7600 Frankie B St-Hewitt Dr Frankie B St-Dead End Staff Overlay
59 Riviera Dr/67 40-67 49 Riviera Dr-Redondo St Riviera Dr-W of Redondo St Staff Overlay
59 Romford Way/71 00-7200 Romford Way-Wakefield Rd Romford Way-Oldham PI Staff Overlay
59 Fountain SU6300 Fountain St-Venice St Fountain St-Billie Faye Dr Staff Overlay
59 Redondo SU4800-4900 Redondo St-Corona Dr Redondo St-Marilyn Ln 5 Year Reconstruction
59 North Tarrant Pkwy/7500-8500 North Tarrant Pkwy-Davis Blvd North Tarrant Pkwy-Smithfield Rd County Road
59 Dewsbury SU6500-6600 Dewsbury St-Glendale Dr Dewsbury St-Chapman Dr Staff Overlay
59 Riddle Dr/6500 Riddle Dr-Simmons Rd Riddle Dr-Main St Staff Overlay
59 Venice SU3500-3700 Venice St-Onyx DrS Venice St-Fountain St 1999 City Staff Overlay
59 Carolyn CU5900-5909 Carolyn Ct-Fieldstone Dr Carolyn Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
60 Gentling PII5100 Gentling PI-Janetta Dr Gentling PI-Maplewood Ave Staff Overlay
60 Rufe Snow Dr/5700-6200 Rufe Snow Dr-Mid Cities Blvd Rufe Snow Dr-R/R Tracks ISTEA
60 Newcastle P1I7000-71 00 Newcastle PI-WakeField Rd Newcastle PI-Oldham PI Staff Overlay
61 Wakefield Rd/6400-6600 Wakefield Rd-Yarmouth Ave Wakefield Rd-Chapman Dr Staff Overlay
61 Topper CU5500 Topper Ct-Noreast Dr Topper Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
61 Amundson Dr/8300-8400 Amundson Dr-Main St Amundson Dr-Amundson Rd 5 Year Reconstruction
62 Rufe Snow Dr/6300-7100 Rufe Snow Dr-Fair Meadows Dr Rufe Snow Dr-Mid Cities Blvd Staff Overlay
62 Misty Meadow Dr/5500 Misty Meadow Dr-Meadow Park N Misty Meadow Dr-Meadow Park S Staff Overlay
63 Bonzer SU3600 Bonzer St-Jerrell St Bonzer St-Grapevine Hwy Staff Overlay
Brookshire Tr/6600 Brookshire Tr-Chapman Dr Brookshire Tr-Romford Way Staff Overlay
II ,,,05 Riviera Dr/7000-7100 Riviera Dr-Blaney Ave Riviera Dr-Vance Rd 1994 CIP Bond
LIST OF WORST STREETS
2
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
September 24, 1999
OCI ....v,"- --F r_, STARrING:NODer~~¥ ' ·tê:,<;i!j'$,j;W:E:NDING;NOD~~;j¡ij;;!;!Jt PROPOSEDUMP.&G~~
\;,
63 Franklin CU8400 Franklin Ct-Shady Grove Rd Franklin Ct-Culd 5 Year Reconstruction
63 Terry Dr/7500-7600 Terry Dr-Susan Lee Ln Terry Dr-North Richland Blvd 5 Year Reconstruction
63 Richland CU5300 Richland Ct-Green Meadow Dr Richland Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
63 Meadowview Terr/7400-7520 Meadowview Terr-Starnes Rd Meadowview Terr-Green Leaf Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
64 Shady Grove Rd/8700 Shady Grove Rd-Davis Blvd Shady Grove Rd-Precinct Line Rd 5 Year Reconstruction
64 Crestwood Cir W/5700-5725 Crestwood Cir W-Steeplewood Dr Crestwood Cir W-Jean Ann Dr Staff Overlay
64 Simmons Rd/6400 Simmons Rd-Main St Simmons Rd-Martin Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
64 Briardale Dr/6900-7100 Briardale Dr-Hewitt Dr Briardale Dr-Hightower Dr Staff Overlay
64 Stonybrooke Dr/7200-7400 Stonybrooke Dr-Hightower Dr Stonybrooke Dr-Rumfield Rd Staff Overlay
64 Oldham PI/7100-7200 Oldham PI-Yarmouth Ave Oldham PI-Buckingham Tr Staff Overlay
64 Finian Ln/5420-5500 Finian Ln-Park Entrance Finian Ln-Emerald Hills Way 5 Year Reconstruction
64 Walter Rd/6900 Walter Rd-Amundson Rd Walter Rd-Clift St Routine Maintenance
64 Jerrie Jo Dr/8301 Jerrie Jo Dr-Jennings Dr Jerrie Jo Dr-Culd Staff Overlay
65 Lola Dr/7500-7600 Lola Dr-Scott Dr Lola Dr-Susan Lee Ln 5 Year Reconstruction
65 Hanging Cliff P1/7000-7200 Hanging Cliff PI-Windhaven Rd Hanging Cliff PI-Wind haven Rd 5 Year Reconstruction
65 Birchwood Dr/7800-7900 Birchwood Dr-Davis Blvd Birchwood Dr-Grapevine Hwy 5 Year Reconstruction
65 Hunter Ln/8000 Hunter Ln-Continental Tr Hunter Ln-Kim Ln Staff Overlay
65 Southampton Rd/6900-7000 Southampton Rd-Wakefield Rd Southampton Rd-Chapman Dr Staff Overlay
65 Hightower Dr/7600-7705 Hightower Dr-Hightower Dr Hightower Dr-W of Century Dr Staff Overlay
65 Edinburg Dr/71 00-7721 Edinburg Dr-Wakefield Rd Edinburg Dr-Brookshire Tr Staff Overlay
65 Hanover Ln/7500 Hanover Ln-Douglas Ln Hanover Ln-Lincoln Dr Staff Overlay
65 Irish Dr/7800-8212 Irish Dr-Mockingbird Ln Irish Dr-Irish Dr Staff Overlay
65 Noreast Dr/7500 Noreast Dr-Scott Dead End Noreast Dr-Susan Lee Ln 5 Year Reconstruction
65 Crane Rd/6600-6720 Crane Rd-Main St Crane Rd-Crane Rd 1994 CIP Bond
') Timberidge Dr/7200-7300 Timberidge Dr-Starnes Rd Timberidge Dr-Timberlane Staff Overlay
..J Jannie SU6600 Jannie St-Rufe Snow Dr Jannie St-Charles St Staff Overlay
65 Megan Ln/6700-6800 Megan Ln-Chapman Dr Megan Ln-Hadley Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
65 Simmons Rd/6800 Simmons Rd-Amundson Dr Simmons Rd-N of Copper Canyon Rd Staff Overlay
65 Newcastle P1/6800-7000 Newcastle PI-Dewsbury St Newcastle PI-WakeField Rd Staff Overlay
65 Parkwood Dr/6700 Parkwood Dr-Rufe Snow Dr Parkwood Dr-Crosstimbers Ln Staff Overlay
65 Roberta Dr/5000-7600 Roberta Dr-Lola Dr Roberta Dr-Clenis Ln 1994 CIP Bond
65 St.Patrick SU8200 St. Patrick St-Newman Dr St Patrick St-Cork Ln 5 Year Reconstruction
65 Rufe Snow Dr/4200-4800 Rufe Snow Dr-Shauna Dr Rufe Snow Dr-Mike Dr 1994 CIP Bond
66 Mickey SU7900-8000 Mickey St-Smithfield Rd Mickey St -Dead End Staff Overlay
66 Green Acres Dr/6800 Green Acres Dr-Crosstimbers Ln Green Acres Dr-Meadowview Terr Staff Overlay
66 Spruce CU8200 Spruce Ct-Timberlane Dr Spruce Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
66 Coventry CU7200 Coventry Ct-Coventry Cir Coventry Ct-Dead End Staff Overlay
66 Woods Ln/8133-8300 Woods Ln-Davis Blvd Woods Ln-Dead End Staff Overlay
66 Northridge Blvd-5333-5400 Northridge Blvd-200'S of Lynda Ln Northridge Blvd-Lynda Ln Staff Overlay
66 Rolling Ridge Dr/6800 Rolling Ridge Dr-Douglas Ln Rolling Ridge Dr-Dead End Staff Overlay
66 Driftwood CU7700 Driftwood Ct-Rolling Ridge Dr Driftwood Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
66 Boulder CU6500-6505 Boulder Ct-Boulder Dr Boulder Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
66 Steeplewood Dr/5800-5900 Steeplewood Dr-North Richland Blvd Steeplewood Dr-Dead End Staff Overlay
66 Riviera Dr/6800-6900 Riviera Dr-Vance Rd Riviera Dr-Redondo St 1994 CIP Bond
66 Venice SU3400 Venice St-Onyx DrS Venice St-Richland Plaza Staff Overlay
66 Clark SU7800-8000 Clark St-Davis Blvd Clark St-Colorado Blvd 5 Year Reconstruction
66 Rolling Ridge CU7700 Rolling Ridge Ct-Rolling Ridge Dr Rolling Ridge Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
66 Glenhurst Dr/6800-6900 Glenhurst Dr-Sunset Rd Glenhurst Dr-Sunrise Dr Staff Overlay
66 Crane Rd/6720-6900 Crane Rd-Crane Rd Crane Rd-Amundson Dr 1994 CIP Bond
66 Scarborough P1/6500-6512 Scarborough PI-Oldham PI Scarborough PI-Culd Staff Overlay
67 John Autry Rd/7400-7600 John Autry Rd-Aubrey Ln John Autry Rd-Red Oak Dr Staff Overlay
67 Sunrise Dr/6300-6500 Sunrise Dr-Sunset Rd Sunrise Dr-Glendale Dr Staff Overlay
" Blaney Ave/4600-4800 Blaney Ave-Holiday Ln Blaney Ave-Shauna Dr 1999 City Staff Overlay
II"J( Parkway Ave(6500 Parkway Ave-Martin Rd Parkway Ave-Valley View Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
LIST OF WORST STREETS
3
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS
PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
September 24, 1999
OCI "'c"C',,. ~':; '!~\Jtt;ì\Þ¡t;;¡:;¡;¡STAR"tING NODE,_.þ~~ Jj;~;~t;t~;;¡¡;;"'¡!;f:END1NGrNOPIt::8:,~4ìi1':¡~ ;PROPOSED;IMeRo.YeMENIS¡
67 Brookview Dr/8500-8529 Brookview Dr-Stonybrook Dr Brookview Dr-Brookview Dr Staff Overlay
67 Meadowview Terr/7000-7300 Meadowview Terr-Starnes Rd Meadowview Terr-Springdale Ln 5 Year Reconstruction
67 Riviera Dr17200-7400 Riviera Dr-Ken Michael Ct Riviera Dr-Holiday Ln 5 Year Reconstruction
67 Cummings Dr/4100 Cummings Dr-Glenview Dr Cummings Dr-Blaney Ave Staff Overlay
67 ChapelCU7700 Chapel Ct-Abbott Ave Chapel Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
67 Riviera Dr/6029-6532 Riviera Dr-Culd Riviera Dr-Lariat Tr Staff Overlay
67 Wood Creek CU4800 Wood Creek Ct-Riviera Dr Wood Creek Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
67 Stoneridge Dr/7000 Stone ridge Dr-Culd Stoneridge Dr-Brookview Dr Staff Overlay
67 Field Stone CU5900-5909 Field Stone Ct-Field Stone Dr Field Stone Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
67 Live Oak Dr/7000 Live Oak Dr-Meandering Dr Live Oak Dr-Amundson Dr Staff Overlay
67 Meandering Dr/91 00-9300 Meandering Dr-Amundson Dr Meandering Dr-Precinct Line Rd Staff Overlay
68 Douglas Ln/7600-7812 Douglas Ln-Hanover Ln Douglas Ln-Rolling Ridge Dr 1994 CIP Bond
68 Main SU8400-8800 Main St-Sherri Ln Main St-Crane Rd Staff Overlay
68 Mapleleaf Dr17500-7600 Mapleleaf Dr-Parkway Ave Mapleleaf Dr-John Autry Rd Staff Overlay
68 Shanua Dr/6700-7100 Shauna Dr-Rufe Snow Dr Shanua Dr-Blaney Ave Staff Overlay
68 Noneman SU7800 Noneman St-Briardale Dr Noneman St-Smithfield Rd Staff Overlay
68 Lola Dr/7600-7700 Lola Dr-Susan Lee Ln Lola Dr-Davis Blvd 5 Year Reconstruction
68 Windhaven Rd/7400-7500 Wind haven Rd-Starnes Rd Windhaven Rd-Overton Pk Staff Overlay
68 Springdale Ln/6800-7000 Springdale Ln-Green Ridge Tr Springdale Ln-Crosstimbers Ln Staff Overlay
68 Kirk Rd17500-8800 Kirk Rd-Rumfield Rd Kirk Rd-Kirk Ln 5 Year Reconstruction
68 Shadydale CU6700 Shadydale Ct-Crosstimbers Ln Shadydale Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
68 Deville Dr17200-7300 Deville Dr-Blaney Ave Deville Dr-Cummings Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
69 Shadydale Dr/6800 Shadydale Dr-Crosstimbers Ln Shadydale Dr-Meadowview Terr Staff Overlay
69 Windcrest CU7250 Windcrest Ct-Windcrest Ln Windcrest Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
1 Oak View Ave/7500 Oak View Ave-North Park Dr Oak View Ave-Parkwood Dr Staff Overlay
d Spring River Ln/6500-6549 Spring River Ln-Lariat Tr Spring River Ln-Riviera Dr Staff Overlay
69 Oakland Ln/7100 Oakland Ln-Holiday Ln Oakland Ln-Blaney Ave Staff Overlay
69 High Oaks Dr/6700-9100 High Oaks Dr-Nob Hill Dr High Oaks Dr-Rolling Hills Dr Staff Overlay
69 Sagebrush Ct S/7700-7717 Sagebrush Ct S-Rolling ridge Dr Sagebrush Ct S-Culd 5 Year Reconstruction
70 Lariat Tr/4400-4720 Lariat Tr-Circleview Dr Lariat Tr-Riviera Dr Staff Overlay
70 Rivera Dr/7000-6740 Riviera Dr-W of Redondo St Riviera Dr-Oliver Dr Staff Overlay
70 Cardinal Ln/8200-8500 Cardinal Ln-Davis Blvd Cardinal Ln-Martin Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
70 Leaning Oak Dr/7000 Leaning Oak Dr-Meandering Dr Leaning Oak Dr-Amundson Dr Staff Overlay
70 Wistful Dr/8700 Wistful Dr-Weyland Dr Wistful Dr-Dead End Staff Overlay
70 College Circle/7400-7700 College Circle-N of Abbott Ave College Circle-Terry Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
70 Trinidad Dr/6800-7100 Trinidad Dr-Rufe Snow Dr Trinidad Dr-Holiday Ln 5 Year Reconstruction
70 Ulster CU8249 Ulster Ct-Culd Ulster Ct-Ulster Dr Staff Overlay
70 Carol CU4900 Carol Ct-Corona Dr Carol Ct-Reynolds Rd Staff Overlay
70 Lonesome Oak Dr/7000 Lonesome Oak Dr-Meandering Dr Lonesome Oak Dr-Amundson Dr Staff Overlay
70 Holiday CU5300 Holiday Ct-Green Meadow Dr Holiday Ct-Culd Staff Overlay
70 Flory SU41 00 Flory St-Manor Dr Flory St-Glenview Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
70 Briley Dr/6533-6500 Briley Dr-Lariat Tr Briley Dr-Rufe Snow Dr 5 Year Reconstruction
LIST OF WORST STREETS
4
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
'--.
Department: Planning & Inspections Department
Council Meeting Date: 01/10/00
Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to the Zoning Agenda Number: PZ 99-31
Ordinance, Article 10, Fencing Regulations, Article 11, Definitions, and Article 3,
Permitted Uses Relative to Required Masonry Screening Wall Requirements, Non-
Masonry Screening Requirements, Screening of Outdoor Refuse Containers, Screening
of areas for Vehicular Storage, Special Screening Requirements and Mechanical
Equipment Screening and Any Other Deletions or Additions. Ordinance No. 2444
CASE SUMMARY
The Planning and Zoning Commission held public hearings on October 26, and December
9,1999 to consider amendments to Article 10, Fencing Regulations, Article 11, Definitions,
and Article 3, Permitted Uses. Exhibit "An (Article 10) in the attached ordinance shows all
the proposed language as underlined and bolded and all the language proposed to be
deleted is shown as bolded with overstrikes.
Summary of additions to Article 10. Screening and Fencing Regulations
· Screening Wall measured by panel height and not from the ground.
· Screening Wall requirements exempted on property in and abutting the Little Bear
Creek Corridor.
· Screening Walls constructed in a manner consistent with the exterior finish of the main
',,- building.
· Outdoor storage screened with a 6 foot masonry wall.
· Loading docks and delivery entrances shall not face onto a public street. A SUP is
required for loading docks and delivery entrances facing a public street.
· Outdoor refuse containers setback from residentially zoned district a minimum of 25
feet.
· Outdoor refuse containers shall be screened on 3 sides and a gate on the remaining
side. Screening wall shall be consistent with the exterior finish of the main building.
· Recycling containers shall not be required to be screened, but shall be set back behind
all the building setback lines of the primary structure.
· Vehicle Storage Facility shall be screened around its entire perimeter with a berm and
the parking lot shall be landscaped according to the landscape regulation ordinance.
· Mechanical equipment screening - roof mounted and ground mounted - public view
determined from any and all points on the front property line.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Avallabla
'--
4Ù
Finance Director
ead Signature
/8~~
\\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1\DATA\PZ\Cases\PZ Cases\PZ 99-31-43 ZOA Article 10 & 11 Screening & Fencing.doc
Page 1 of 2
, " __ _ _ _~____,______..~_____~_._~_,.______~__~~____,____'____N_'_-~
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Summary of additions to Article 11. Definitions
· Defined masonry and screening.
Summary of additions to Article 3. Permitted Uses
· Revised Section 320 Special Land Use Regulations Screening of Outdoor Storage
Areas to refer to Article 10, so the requirements will be consistent.
RECOMMENDA TION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their public hearing on December 9, 1999,
recommended approval of the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments PZ 99-31 with
revisions to the wording exempting those portions of a lot or tract lying in the Little Bear
Creek Corridor from the masonry screening wall requirements by a vote of 7 to O.
To approve Ordinance 2444 and PZ 99-31 as recommended by the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
\\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1\DATA\PZ\Cases\P, vi:l:S~:S""'L. ::1::1-,) 1-'1,) L.U/'\ /'\IUCI~ IU 0. II ~CI~~1I1I1Y & Fencing,doc
Page 2 of 2
Draft Copy
12.
PZ 99-31
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, ARTICLE 10 FENCING REGULATIONS, ARTICLE 11,
DEFINITIONS AND ARTICLE 3, PERMITTED USES RELATIVE TO
REQUIRED MASONRY SCREENING WALL REQUIREMENTS, NON-
MASONRY SCREENING REQUIREMENTS, APPROVED SCREENING PLANT
MATERIALS LIST, SCREENING OF OUTDOOR REFUSE CONTAINERS,
SCREENING OF AREAS FOR VEHICULAR STORAGE, SPECIAL
SCREENING REQUIREMENTS AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
SCREENING AND ANY OTHER DELETIONS OR ADDITIONS.
Ms. Ratcliff explained that Mr. Sefko of Dunkin, Sefko and Associates would be
making a presentation and answering any questions.
Dan Sefko, Duncan, Sefko & Associates made a PowerPoint presentation, which
covered all the proposed amendments.
Chairman Bowen opened the public hearing and asked for any proponents.
Seeing none, he called for opponents. Seeing none, the public hearing was
closed.
Mr. Tolbert, seconded by Mr. Laaubacher, moved to approve PZ 99-31,
provided the language is added as an exemption to the masonry screening
wall requirements regarding the Little Bear Creek Corridor. The following
language was suggested: "Exemption: The masonry screening wall
requirements shall be exempted on those portions of lots or tracts within
the Little Bear Creek Corridor." The motion carried unanimously.
P & Z Minutes
November 11, 1999
12
ORDINANCE NO. 2444
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE ZONING
REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, AS
AMENDED, TO AMEND ARTICLE 10, FENCE REGULATIONS,
ARTICLE 3, PERMITTED USES AND ARTICLE 11, DEFINITIONS;
RELA TIVE TO MASONRY SCREENING WALL REQUIREMENTS, NON-
MASONRY SCREENING REQUIREMENTS, SCREENING OF
OUTDOOR REFUSE CONTAINERS, SCREENING OF AREAS FOR
VEHICULAR STORAGE, SPECIAL SCREENING REQUIREMENTS AND
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING AND ADDING DEFINITIONS
OF MASONRY AND SCREENING.
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has determined the need to amend
Article 3, Article 10, and Article 11 in the Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning & Zoning
Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a
recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by changing
said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, in Case Number PZ 99-31 (City of North Richland Hills) Article 3 "Permitted
Uses" Section 320.17 shall be amended to add the following language in its entirety as
follows:
(17) Screening of Outdoor Storage Areas - As permitted by Article 10, Fencing
Regulations.
2.
THAT, in Case Number PZ 99-31 (City of North Richland Hills), Article 11 "Definitions"
shall be amended to add the following definitions which shall read in their entirety as
follows:
MASONRY - A form of approved construction composed of natural stone, rock, or
brick, painted aggregate or exposed aggregate concrete, or split-face concrete masonry
block.
SCREENING - The use of a masonry wall, earth berm, or an opaque, dense form of
landscaping or any combination thereof, to provide a physical and visual barrier.
Ordinance No. 2444
Page 1 of 11
3.
THAT, in Case Number PZ 99-31 (City of North Richland Hills), Article 10,
Fencing Regulations be amended as shown in Exhibit "A": to add, delete or alter
masonry screening wall requirements, non-masonry screening requirements,
screening of outdoor refuse containers, screening of areas for vehicular storage,
special screening requirements and mechanical equipment screening.
4.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City
Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance
are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this
ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not
affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this
ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section.
5.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Zoning Ordinance of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save
and except as amended by this Ordinance
6.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage.
Secretary, Planning and Z ning Commission
Ordinance No. 2444
Page 2 of 11
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 10th DAY OF JANUARY,
2000.
Mayor Charles Scoma
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
APPROVE~ALlTY:
Attorney for the City
Ordinance No. 2444
Page 3 of 11
Exhibit "A"
ARTICLE 10
SCREENING AND FENCING REGULATIONS
SECTION 1000, Landscaping Regulations and Section 1010, Buffer Yard Regulations
are no longer included in the Zoning Ordinances but are considered to be a stand-alone
ordinance and are attached.
Section 1000 RESERVED
Section 1010 RESERVED
Section 1020 SCREENING WALLS
A. Purpose - It is the purpose of this Section to provide for screening between
zoning districts of different character in order to mitigate the effects of
potential nuisances such as dirt, litter, noise, heat, and glare of lights, and to
protect public and private investment. It is also the intent of this Section to
provide for the safe construction and maintenance of walls and fences
constructed in the City.
B. Masonry Screening Wall Required - A masonry screening wall, not less
than six (6) feet nor more than eight (8) feet in panel height, shall be required
on all property in accordance with Table 10-F. Masonry screening walls shall
be designed and constructed in accordance with the standards contained in
the Public Works' Design Manual fer Pyblie V.(erks .' Utilities.
1. Applicability - This regulation shall be applicable to (1) all new
construction; or (2) any proposed building remodeling, alteration,
addition, or expansion which either (a) the value of the proposed
improvements exceed seventy-five (75) percent of the current appraised
value of the existing structure(s), excluding the value of the land; or (b)
increases the square footage of the building by thirty (30) percent or
more.
2. Location of Screening Wall - The masonry screening wall shall be
constructed along the entire length of the common property line between
such properties and within the property required to erect the screening
wall. The masonry-screening wall shall be constructed prior to the
issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy.
3. Abuttinq Iron Horse Golf Course - Residential lots that abut Iron Horse
Golf course shall be exempt from the masonry screening wall
requirement.
Ordinance No. 2444
Page 4 of 11
Exhibit "A"
4. Little Bear Creek Corridor - Only those portions of lots or tracts
lying within the Little Bear Creek Corridor shall be exempt from the
masonry screening wall requirements.
4-.~ R-7-MF Multi-Familv Residential Zoned Districts - Perimeter screening
abutting public street right-of-way, parks, or other dedicated open space,
shall be provided as follows:
a. Where a proposed multi-family development is adjacent to a C4U
thoroughfare, or larger, as shown on the Master Thoroughfare Plan,
said screening shall consist of a permanent decorative masonry
screening walr, not less than six (6) -feet in height, constructed along
and adjacent to said thoroughfare.
b. Where a proposed multi-family development is adjacent to a C2U or
R2U thoroughfare, park, or other dedicated open space, said
screening wall shall consist of a permanent decorative screening wall
of masonry, stone, or wrought iron type construction, or a
combination thereof, not less than six (6) feet in height. Wrought iron
material shall not exceed 40% of the total wall face, including
columns.
c. Perimeter screening shall be constructed prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
&:.6. Hotel/Motel Developments: The masonry screening wall shall not be
less than or more than eight (8) feet in height where a motel or hotel use
abuts property zoned for any residential use. Ord. 2184, 3/24/97
fh7. MH-1 District: Perimeter screening abutting public street right-of-way,
parks, or any other residential district. . Ord. 2274, 3/23/98
8. Masonry screenina walls shall be constructed in accordance with the
Public Works' Design Manual. and where possible shall be in a
manner consistent with the exterior finish of the main buildina(s) in
material and color. Where applicable. screenina walls shall be
extensions of the development's architectural design.
9. Outdoor storage of material or commodities shall be screened with a
minimum six (6) foot masonry wall. Outdoor storage of materials or
commodities shall not be stacked at a heiaht higher than the heiaht
of the screenina wall/fence. See Article 6. Outside Storage
Reaulations.
10. Outside display is not reauired to be screened. and if a temporary
use. shall be in accordance with Article 6. Temporarv Uses and
Ordinance No. 2444
Page 5 of 11
Exhibit "A"
BuildinQs. Outside disPlay shall not encroach upon any reQuired off-
street parking areas. unless as otherwise provided.
11. LoadinQ docks and delivery entrances facinQ a public street shall
reQuire a Special Use Provision in accordance with Article 5.
Loading docks and delivery entrances not facinQ a public street shall
be screened from any public roadway. Servicelloading areas shall
be screened from residential and office districts by a minimum six (6)
foot tall masonry wall. a solid living screen or a combination thereof.
C. NeR MaseRry ¡GreeRiRg FeRGe ReElYiFeEl OR existing praperties wher-e
3 maseRry ssreeRiRg ':fall is Ret FeElYiFeEl, a sight barriRg feRGe, Rat
leGs thaR six (&) feet Rer mere thaR eight (8) feet iR height shall be
reElYireEl aR all prepe~' as sha~.\·R in Table 1 g F. The sight barring
feRse shall be seRstrysteEl aleng the entire length ef the GemmeR
prepert}· line bet\\'een Sysh preperties, anEl '.:Jithin the prepert)· reElYired
te erest the GsreeniRg feRse. The sight barring fense shall be
GenstrysteEl prier te the issyanse ef any Certifisate ef Ossypansy.
Ordinance No. 2444
Page 6 of 11
Exhibit "A"
D. Table of District Screening Requirements
Table 10 - F
Masonry Screening Requirements for Districts Shown
in Column 1 When Abutting Certain Districts
Column 1 Abutting District
Wall
Required
This District AG R1S R1 R2 R3 R4D R~T R8 MH1 R7MF U PD
AG
R1S
R1
R2
R3 I
R4D I
R6T
R8 I i
R7MF R R R R R R R R R*
MH1 R R R R R R R R R R-
01 R R R R R R R R R R R-
LR R R R R I R R R R R R R*
C1 R R R R R R R i R R R R*
C2 R R R R R R R i R R R R*
OC I R R R R R R R R R R R-
I
11 R R R R R R R R R I R R*
12 R R R ! R R R R I R R R R-
I
U R R R R R R R i I R-
PD As required by the approved site plan
"R" Denotes masonry screeing wall requirement. See Section 1020 C for existing properties.
* Wall required when the Planned Development is for residential use.
Section 1025 GENERAL SCREENING WALL AND FENCE CRITERIA
A. Height - Walls and fences shall be no greater than eight feet in height. The
height of a wall or fence shall be the vertical distance between the ground
and the top of the wall or fence. In terrain where the ground slopes at a
grade of ten (10) percent or more, the wall or fence may be built in eight (8)
foot horizontal stair step sections. The average height of each fence section
shall be no greater than eight (8) feet in height.
B. Maintenance - Every screening wall and screening fence shall be
adequately maintained by the property owner.
C. Front Yards - Non-sight barring fences may be allowed in front yards. Such
fences shall be wrought iron, and shall be no greater than four (4) feet in
Ordinance No. 2444
Page 7 of 11
Exhibit "A"
height, excluding the posts. Front yard fences for residential lots more than
one (1) acre in size and having more than two hundred (200) feet of linear
street frontage shall be no greater than six (6) feet in height, excluding posts.
The posts must be constructed of brick or stone. Ord. No. 2356
D. Visibility Triangle - All walls and fences located on a corner lot shall comply
with any applicable Visibility Sight Triangles as provided for in this
Ordinance.
E. Transverse Frontage Lots - When the rear yard of a first lot abuts the side
yard of a second lot, no fence on the first lot shall encroach into the side yard
adjacent to the street unless the fence complies with paragraph "C" of this
section. (see illustration #11)
F. Reverse Frontage Lots - When the rear yards of two corner lots abut,
fences may complying with this section may be constructed within the side
yard adjacent to the street. (see illustration #12)
Section 1026 SCREENING OF OUTDOOR REFUSE CONTAINERS
Refuse containers. trash dumpsters/containers. trash compactors. box
compactors. and other similar containers which are used for waste disposal
purposes shall onlv be allowed as an incidental use. and onlv when located
behind the buildina line established bv the structure and not within any side or
rear yard setback or any reQuired landscaped buffer yard. Refuse containers.
trash dumpsters/containers. compactors. box compactors. and other similar
containers shall be setback from all residentially zoned districts a minimum of
25 feet.
A. Screening Wall Materials Screening walls on a minimum of three sides
shall be constructed of brick or other low maintenance materials. which
are consistent with the exterior finish of the main buildina(s) in material
and color. The screenina walls shall be constructed to be a minimum
of one (1) foot in height above the container. and shall not exceed eight
(8) feet in panel heiaht. Where possible and economically feasible.
screenina walls around service areas and/or dumpster enclosures shall
be similar to or extensions of the development's architectural design.
Outdoor refuse containers shall be eQuipped with aates capable of
screenina the area from public view when closed. In no case shall
materials be stored higher than the screenina provided.
B. Gates to any such area shall remain closed except when filling or
emptying the container.
Ordinance No. 2444
Page 8 of 11
Exhibit "An
C. RecvclinQ containers shall not be reQuired to be screened but be set
back behind all the buildino setback lines of the primary structure.
Section 1027 Safety
No screening wall or fence shall be constructed or maintained in a manner that
endanger the health or safety of the general public. The following regulations are
adopted for public safety.
A. Barbed Wire Prohibited - Fences constructed of barbed wire, except for
livestock fences, and walls topped with broken glass or surfaced with similar
materials shall be prohibited. -
B. Security Fences - A security fence of not less than six feet in height may be
topped by barbed wire only in the C-2 Commercial, 1-1 Light Industrial, and 1-
2 Medium Industrial zoning districts.
C. Electric Fences - Electric fences that are capable of causing harm or death
shall be prohibited in the City. This shall not prevent the use of approved
and listed equipment to charge single strands of wires for the purpose of
animal or livestock control.
Section 1028 Vehicle Storage Facility Screening
Vehicle storage facility parkinCJ shall be landscaped in accordance with the
separate landscapino reQulations. The vehicle storaQe facility shall be
screened around its entire perimeter with a maximum 30-inch hioh earth berm
with 1:3 (one vertical to three horizontal) slopes set within a minimum twenty
(20) foot wide parkino lot edoe. Such parkinQ lot edge shall be provided
between the property line and the edQe of the parking lot. The entire lenQth of
the berm shall be vegetated with live plant material as listed in the adopted
plant material list of the landscapinQ regulations. The vehicle storage area
shall be landscaped according to the reQuirements for LandscapinQ of Parking
Lots.
In additieR te the laREJGsapiRg reEluiremeRΠef the zeRing ElistriGt, Re
Certifisate of OssypanGY shall be issyeEl for a \./ehiGle StÐrage Fasility YRtil
eRe ef the follewiRg ssreeRiRg ÐptieRs has beeR satisfied.
Þr. C 2 anEl OC DistriGŒ
1. A permanent maseRf'}' sGreeRiRg feRse ef Ret less than six feet iR
height shall be seRstrysteEl aleng the fJrepe~' liRe aEljaGent te any
pYblis street right of way; er,
Ordinance No. 2444
Page 9 of 11
---.-.--.,.-...-.- ..._."'._'~~------~,~-,---,-------~--
Exhibit "An
2. A ':feed Gteskade ssreening fense ef net less than Gix feet in height
shall be senstrusted '.vithin a landssaped byffer area \--¡hish Ghall be
parallel \-.~ith the preperty line aEljasent te any pYblis Gtreet right ef
'Nay. The landssaped byffer aFea shall sentain not leGs than ene
half et the reEfyired landssaped area and be irrigated and planted
'.\~ith shrYbs, ~Yshes, and.(ar trees fasing the street right ef way.
The shrYbs, byshes, andter trees shall sever at least sixt}' persent
ef the fense.
8. I 1 and I 2 Distrists A shain link fense et net less than Gix feet in height
shall be senstrysted aleng the preperty line aEljasent ta any py~lic
street right ef 'J.".ay.
Sestien 103Q SPECIAL SCRliiNING RIiQUIRiMIiNTS
A. Applisabilit}' These regYlatiens shall apply te these land yses listed in
Sestien 310, Table ef Permitted Uses that are designated as ha'¡ing
Spesial Ssreening ReEfyiremente. Sysh ssreening regYlatiens shall
beseme applisable ypon any shange ef Yse, essypansy er at sysh time
aG a bYilding permit is applied fer exsept as atherv:ise Gpesified by thiG
code.
8. Types ef Ssreening Where reEfyired a Gsreening fense shall be erested
te a height Ret less than Gix (&) feet and pre':ide a 'Jisyal barrier frem
adjasent propertieG and GtFeete. Sysh ssreening Ghall be permanently
and adeEfyately maintained by the ewner ef the preperty en v.~hish the
ssreening is reEfyired. lixsept for the landssape bYffer, ne ssreening
fense or wall shall have mere than ferty (40) Gqyare insheG ef openingG
oyer any eRe (1) sqyare feet ef fense or \--:all syrfase.
Only the felle.....ing typeG of ssreening shall Efualify as meeting the
reqYirements of this Code.
1. landssaÐed 8yffer: This ssreening shall Gensist ef a landGsaped
strip ef not lesG than five (6) feet in width and shall inslyde hedge
like shrl:Jbbel1' et e':ergreen planting material sapable at o~taining a
minimym height af six (&) feet ':dthin the fir-st three yearG of initial
planting. Sysh e'Jergreen planting material Ghall be planted net to
exseed four (4) feet on senters and is a minimym height ef twe and
a half (2 1J2) feet at initial planting. An aytematiG yndergreynd drip
irrigatien er sprinkler system shall be previded fer all required
lamissaped byffer Gsreens. Any landssape byffer reEfyired by thiG
sode shall be maintained in a healthy, thriving senditien.
2. Ssreoning Fence: Fen sing may seRsist ef a selid weed panel or a
galvanized metal shain link fenGe with all '/leather slats interv:e..-en
Ordinance No. 2444
Page 10 of 11
Exhibit "A"
inte tl:le metal fabris. ¡ysl:l tensing sl:lall be senstrysted on metal
posts and plased in sensrete teetings 'Nitl:l brasing.
3. RibbeEt Metal Panel Fense: Fen sing may sensiGt ef a ribbed metal
panel \\'f:liGf:I Gf:lall be sYitably finished te blenEl '.vitl:l tl:le primary
strystyre and 6 1:1 a II be erested en a struGtYFally GeynEt metal frame
set in sensrete. Gal':anizeEl! serrugateEt metal panels Ghall net be
allo\a:ed.
4. MaGenrv \A.~II: ^ maGenr}' ssreening tense sl:lall be GenstrysteEl to
Gem ply ':/itl:l the minimym reElYirements fer masenry sSFeening
't:allG approveEt by tl:le City of Nortl:l Risl:llanEl
Section 1030 MECHANCIAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL
USES & NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING
A. Roof Mounted Mechanical EauiDment Such eauipment shall be
screened from public view with a parapet wall. mansard-style roof or
other architectural extension eaual in height to the unit(s). except when
the unit height exceed five (5) feet. The maximum screenina wall height
shall not exceed five (5) feet. When the height of the units does exceed
five (5) feet. an additional roof setback for the unit shall be reauired at a
ratio of two (2) horizontal feet for each additional foot of vertical height
above five (5) feet. Public view shall be determined from any and all
points on the front property line.
B. Ground Mounted Mechanical Eauipment Such eauipment shall be
screened from public view with a screening wall or livina screen eaual
in heiaht to the unit. The screening wall may be constructed of
masonry or wooden materials. Public view shall be determined from
any and all points on the front property line.
Ordinance No. 2444
Page 11 of 11
"
,
CITY OF
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
Department: Planning & Inspections Department
Council Meeting Date: 01/10/00
Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of D & G Agenda Number: PZ 99-33
Specialties, Inc. for a Specific Use Permit for a Convenience Store and Car Wash in a
"C-1" Commercial District. (Located at 8616 Davis Boulevard at the northeast corner of
Precinct Line Road on proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Gibson Addition - Ordinance 2445
CASE SUMMARY
D & G Specialties Inc. is requesting a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for a convenience store
and car wash on proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Gibson Addition. The subject property and the
surrounding properties are zoned "C-1" Commercial. The proposed convenience store/car
wash will be located on a lot containing 1.252 acres. The total building is proposed to
contain 4,216 square feet. The convenience store is proposed to contain 3,325 square
feet and the car wash is proposed to contain 891 square feet. The site plan shows 29 off-
street parking spaces are being provided, when only 18 spaces are required.
The landscape plan shows approximately 16% of the total lot is devoted to landscaping
and 15% is required. The proposed driveways have been reviewed and approved by the
Public Works Department. The applicant is proposing a monument sign containing 104
square feet that is 12 feet high.
'-
Surrounding Future Land Uses
The subject property is designated as Commercial.
North:
South:
East:
West:
Future Land Use
Commercial
Commercial
Commercial
Commercial
RECOMMENDA TION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their public hearing on November 11,1999,
recommend approval of PZ 99-33 on proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Gibson Addition at 8616
Davis Boulevard by a vote of 6 to O.
To approve Ordinance 2445 and PZ 99-33 as recommended by the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Oth
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
-
Finance Director
~~~
\\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1\DATA\Pz\Cases\PZ Cases\PZ 99-33-42 SUP Bright Star-Gibson Add.doc
Page 1 of 1
-- I T
\, I
'to . I
;1/\ 'i:-I:-
1·/·....· I IJ(H...
I
I I
I '~ I -
I :! I
¡:. ;: -
~--r-------'" ~
-=-=----1
'-- --, .-------- -- _..J
r:~,~ ~'''u
,.<
.-
,'1'-
-. '~~\1.f\~' 1.'0 ----
, '
!
nunH.
,-_.
PZ 99-33
o & G Specialities
SUP for Convenience Store/Car Wash
tic..,
Ie..
....----
LlMI TS
I
.....--.--.. .---.
I
1"'''_'1 I TN
-_L_________
- ....... -----..~..'-
: I ; i I
t./ii.d ¡"~:2:;J 1/1 ¡/~ lJ
. " ,
T'R.U." ·r m"., . '1 .:'IC.
.-....---....-....-..
RAILS EDGE DR
,
I
----- 1-
~ ..·I-·~-·
I "
". -\:~\¡x.\..~ or "
Z,.\:\:'_,. _', _ 0-
· ~ "\\~C\:;.... '.
::¡ Z _'P-.\.)\')~u ""' _
1 2 b [\¡ 1 0 ., .
.- \J -·--c',~~II- ~ ..1-
.~-- ~ ~ .~~[~ ~ ~- \
~ ., i I' ~.,
- ~ - ~ :
II J2 I '"
-'16'73
.'J I J
---c-- ¡-,-
,
"
..
Ifill
AG
---.--
------ .
' ~.A( I :'
._------
:lfll'
H
i..,!(
IAIOf'"
.-
'.)
~\\,\
."
Iff"
:;
'~AI_r :A
AG
~
J
" _ :t<.Jt,)A L
'·:'--,-fJ'~'
,....,
I
----I
I
"'- --.'--.
--
fJofI"--2 fHUII
'II^-I:I
C-1
1675
,
I
I
C-ll
125~
¡
I
I
I
':"l
AG¡
11111"
Il/tit..j
oI"",
TR,W
r~r.
:RAL! [.
I,'A. ¡ t
, .
AI
¡!
'w...:r ~A
...."""
.
P'
.,
.
'IJ.II(.I ;'.1
I"'....' 141
.\ :...ï\::'
-\
l"
/
/
NORTH TARRANT PKWY
,·t.. I 'HI
C-l
1254
C·t
1254
11',\, I H
'..1,',\\
(01\)
.' .~,,(!.,
:\I\~:\ ~;~~ ..""
. '1.1',1" .
L.;
4-=
-'" ~
-..: ~
! ':..\
I-i
(.d ... ,.
-~ u
~~
-:r
A(i; <.~ -
. :.
U£
C~ ~ III
..
CO 0
" u
0"-
N
0
c-.,
¿
u..
;'!
,.,
"'
'"
~
.:a:: C ... ~ f!;:
-"""__a a '-.a
,.\
\J 1'.\.\,'
,.\,\L ,l)"
. I ., ,
\(\,
/,
"'
-
>
~ \1,\1\/11
0
.~
, IAI
It :t
,.
\\( ...\ \\
\'I~.·\<-,.
,,\1: \.
'1"\'
it;,
W MURPHY 1(1)
. : ~. , I I I
HI :11
'7
". . '\
..,'\~\\,
\ ...
. \ ì",
;. ~ '
\
.~'
..
.
M<.I)ONWflL SCHOOL
Ie. \
Ok,
r "II~"
1:·\1
8.
PZ 99-33
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF D & G SPOECALlTIES
INC, FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A CONVENIENCE STOR43E
AND CAR WASH ON PROPERTY TO BE KNOWN AS LOTS 1 & 2K, BLOCK
1, GIBSON ADDITION. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ASTG THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAVIS BLVD & PRECINCT LINE ROAD.
APPROVED
D & G Specialties Inc. is requesting a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for a
convenience store and car wash on proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Gibson Addition.
The subject property and the surrounding properties are zoned "C-1 II
Commercial. The proposed convenience store/car wash will be located on a lot
containing 1.252 acres. The building is proposed to contain 4,334 square feet.
The site plan shows 29 off-street parking spaces are being provided when only
18 spaces are required. The applicant landscape plan shows over 16% of the
total lot is devoted to landscaping.
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve PZ 99-33 for a
Specific Use Permit for convenience store with a car wash on proposed Lot 1,
Block 1, Gibson Addition at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Precinct
Line Road.
Chairman Bowen opened the public hearing and asked for proponents.
Fred Ballinger, architect for the project presented his request. He showed
exterior elevations of an existing facility on Denton Highway in Watauga, which
are similar to the proposed facility in NRH.
Seeing no additional proponents and no opponents, the public hearing was
closed.
Mr. Blue, seconded by Mr. Welch, moved to approve PZ 99-33. The motion
carried unanimously.
P & Z Minutes
November 11, 1999
7
ORDINANCE NO. 2445
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
TO AUTHORIZE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR CONVENIENCE
STORE WITH A CAR WASH IN A C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONING
DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a
recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by
changing said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, in case number PZ 99-33, a Special Use Permit be hereby authorized for a
Convenience Store with a Car Wash on property as proposed to be platted as Lot 1,
Block 1, Gibson Addition and addressed as 8616 Davis Boulevard in a district zoned
"C-1 Commercial.
2.
THAT, development of this property shall be consistent with the site plan attached as
Exhibit "A.
3.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City
Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance
are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this
ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not
affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this
ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section.
Ordinance No. 2445
Page 1 of 4
4.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Zoning Ordinance of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save
and except as amended by this Ordinance.
5.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF
NOVEMBER, 1999.
Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission
Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 10th DAY OF JANUARY
102000.
Charles Scoma, Mayor
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Department Head
Ordinance No. 2416
Page 2 of 4
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorne
~
Ordinance No. 2416
Page 3 of 4
--------
::.
.-"
."'"
CITY OF
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
,....--.,-
Department: Planning & Inspections Department
Council Meeting Date: 01/10/00
Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of CGS Signs to Agenda Number: PZ 99-40
Amend the Signage of the Site Plan of the Approved Special Use Permit for Expo
Design Center on Lot 1 R Block 1, Venture Addition. (Located at 4900 Block of Davis
Boulevard) - Ordinance No. 2446
CASE SUMMARY
CGS, Signs has submitted a revised pole sign elevation for the approved 25 foot pole sign
(Sign B) proposed along Grapevine Highway. The Special Use Permit for on-site custom
cutting of counter tops was approved by City Council on April 12, 1999 by Ordinance No.
2382. The physical layout of the Expo Design Center is not changing. The only proposed
change is to the pole sign elevation. The property is zoned C-2, Commercial with a
Special Use Permit. The property is designated as commercial on the Future Land Use
Plan.
The Special Use Permit approved two pole signs, one on each street frontage. The
existing sign on Davis Boulevard is 65 feet high and contains 396 square feet of sign area.
The proposed sign liB" on Grapevine Highway is 25 foot high sign, containing 98.6 square
feet of message area.
'-.....-
The applicant proposes to keep the same message area and sign height, however the
structure around the message area is proposed to be changed. The width of the structure
is proposed to increase from 16 feet wide to 26'-4" wide. The increase in the width is for
aesthetic appeal so that it will match the appearance of the Expo Design Center building.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their public hearing on December 9, 1999,
recommend approval of PZ 99-40 for a revised Special Use Permit for Expo Design at
4900 Davis Boulevard on Lot 1 R, Block 1, Venture Addition by a vote of 7 to O.
To approve Ordinance 2446 and PZ 99-40 as recommended by the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~
Finance Director
Signature
¿~~
City Manager Signature
\\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1\DATA\PZ\Cases\PZ Cases\PZ 994041 CSB Signs· Expo Design.doc
Page 1 of 1
( IIJ'TCB LINI - SII (;riG: 8.
-..---- -- --r:r~T;¿r7~-T-;'l--;r·--r
tl~S
. <0:~)GP SYBIL DR
~'000\- I 2 ! I." . 6 \7
,. " 12 r·8" 9 I.\"'
. \7
I
6 [7
....
R-2
?o I i
"-, J !. 2 I I
! I ,
-
-
-
2
PALOMAR DR
149
3 4) 5
! 111.
·
·
a
7
2
9
"
·
·
""
~ \ Sf
{...) \ '"
1:10-
JII I !II
.
13
,.
50
._L~~L': C7 J
--I ----- ~Õ------
JII-'
I £,t'-S'\
~\'\\O~
<!A
"
'-
.---
,
C-
.
""
...
JI
I
R : Of
CLENIS LN
~ i.! '" I
lOA
2"
...
f--
JII
f--
JI
f--
.IT A D R
9 I "
. I n ~ ·
7 ! a ~ 7
. ~
_ ~18~ 6
~ I ,. I ·
- 1: ..---'¡-r
:>0 . : IS rn.. IS
-:~r! II
--~ r-,-
z 2 s-;;- ¡z. 2 17
-:>O~;--Î -\--
_~ I \" \ \ 1 ,"
~-
~"
81 t::= '"
:=-P =~ ""
'~=11 -"- ""
¡~~ =';= ;-
_.~ @3~= rnt
~ ~-!- 1Jt
. u 8-
~- :::= ...
...- -.-
~ === 20'
~r- =:= :
..... ..
,;, .
" 2:r<
~ .
b6 'CD 2*"
-S:H"I!)i¡¡"~s.
¡
. \-~~\)
~ÿ.;. ! C£,
S?-?;~ _
c-
H)I
;1' ^
.
a
f-----;- ...
r-
.
-;-1 --in
e-- ~
J ~
1ft
.
n
>
,..
2211
2'"
..
'-
"
1'(' ~
'-0 ~
Op
8<0
"
,.
.. IS.~
Z! II 0 !
> -I--- ~
~ 2 17: 2
-< I-'r---- > ~
\~ 1 e 0 1
Z L-.R~ --2- ·
I
'" læ
I
III
01
III
!II I I7R
?II q...
!II \ ...
" i 2D'
...
JII
:II
'"
III
C- U
...
-ti-
"
-
~ 1111....
- Uf~ì>Äl£;.? -1 R-1": : ,il=~~::£
! ~i~tj 1 \. 9 " ~ [
!. ,! ,.~. r, 1", ¡.To ~ ..
CLARK ST
: ~ '¡J 12 1':-;- _~_J"I~W~IJ I~ ~
- ~ lj_ ~~"¡4: 5 "
" ~ - 1 6 C\:¡~þo. , , ___~--
.. . . _ " \" ¡O. 21 ~" ' .
H8- 11-GI8~ C}15+ª- O~ ,r. >/. $
II: ~ ~ 9 . ~' (ê~ :.¡
· ~ :; I· \!: ~'i,:i~-~
STANDLEY ST
I :: 16 I I : I I ! i i -
20 r ¡ J " ~ i' 1 2 I I I 2 I R. 4 ~ [) ~ ~ I ¡
V'I> -=--~ ...,~;-:~~~~-:-_.~ -~~.L;-~?~r- ~
C-l
« C-2' MAP EW 0 () n A VF .......i 2-;
~ A2 .. I I ¡ ! 2{' i ~ I 6 ~M'! I ./. ~ j~~C
I I Iii , / ~:
co ". C2 ft 13 9: a \ '7 0 t / ' a ~ / 3t . ~
~ 81 CHWOOD DR / · - 1 ~ .Co·2 JI
; , " · '!'22"':"; . ~~ ~
~ ..<"(~ 0
'2~C-' G~'r-:. C'~ot.<,,(
,., .. oJ>
· R,<,:
8
~ !!¡~~~mm::·::~g: . 2
\ \ ·n~~::·:·, .:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:
¡lliäm~ .::..
ø"O
2
~ -d.
-1-3- -1-7-
! C'> J J
-:-: --;--' ~
o
z
'"
If
-
"'"
-19-
"'-1JC7
.....
"'-11.
"'-æ
,. I 24R
H_rnola ~
"V\ 17 "
~F= 13" ~I
~~ .
PZ 99-40
CGS SIGNS/SUP
LOT 1, BLOCK 1, VENTURE ADDITION
G:~\
'"
\ .
l~ ·
o}__o
! "'-"" ~
a:,
c
.
T-
t I
i ...,
o
.
I .',
If I !II Iri~'"
!--'--... r...---
. I III
i II
13
2
\
I
\
I
\
I
,
JII
\
\
-1_
r:IÞ
"
..
I
., \
~ -
¡ c·,
--.......... ___ r::::;:::;: , )~'ö\~ ,.: .
~ - "'... ''f-\ 'be., ~
lR ¡¡2~8E tz1
W'"
7
'8'"
, ,'" .,....
".... to',·
" " ~ '.
"JII toV, ~ ...., '"
'" ;,. '. "'.. "" 5' ""
'. "y.
R .! ", . '"
2", ./'. ""
;/ ......
>
00
\~
2
~
!'"
"
I ,/ '1,r
- 10-
Z .r....
,
,
.~./..... -t,.'
. T7 7
. ", J ~ t; ,)
'. ....
:..--- V'
·í~41: ~ <
'---
,
~-
. \
I ,
TR.t,CT AJ.
c-,
)
-
6
: ~\: N
1 'i!-\çt\\-Þ> U
~a?-~ÿ.;. S'\ ~'\\O~ ~
4\~\-S ~ I
" '§J\\
I \'-
~O\\t, "
--~_.: C-
NO-
,0-
uoO
...
,1,.'
"
-
-. -
I
-
.
I
0;:: I :
~i :
~- -
:.... . þ
;Ë I" c
:z:" .
.... .
õ; . ;
_.L~:~_. ._..._n_' U" r
22. 1993 CURRENT THROUGH: Ordln.nc4!' 23
.....-- ZONING "'AP Gr
ADOPTED: ~hrch
---¡) ...-- \ \ rJ ({
¡tapo 6€ d.. L01-C, y\. I:)
___1-___
~~ (>)<. f. \Ji.~ £_J ')
~y .-..
4'''' Itr 17-r
"-1·
5'-1 Itr ""'If" ,..-..
"Ie '"
'r
""
,.
E.1.F.s. 12 CORNCE <MR W11..
sruos (SEE STRUCT. FOR
SIZE .II SPACING OF STUDS)
~~(J~~'....
I D..,.. C..,.,.
" A.... .....,. ..........
~ I
--~
~I
I I
'r I " III
~/ II
~ I I
" I
JCK 25
SIGH CAllNET 8'1' OTHERS
DDmON (N.I.C.) - 'ÆRlFY DIiIÐISIONS
Page 39 WITH SIGH ~UFAC11JER
)
15' X 15" CERAMIC TU: (BI.ACI<)
S£T IN 1'-0' X 1'-0· P
~
~
~
E.I.r.s. I' COUJWN SHAFT <MR
WTL STUDS
~
caw COw.... !lASE - a.IU
TO .....TCH CUU A.T BULDlNG "
IN S1'Il£ AND COLOR
"'
,
'"
~
'r...............
,. I
""-
.., I2õ\
~
Ie
I I
,
,
'"
-
2'-'" '-I
4'4
t5'-,.
-,
,
,
"
FRONT ELEVATION C PYLON SIGN
SCALE: N. T.5.
~
.',Ir.
5'-1 'If"
4'.... Ijr
/
f28\
~
%
~.
HAND
f2õ\
~.5
0Pf>.
HAND
/
~
~
/
DETAIL B
FOR REFERENCE ONLY
(See architectural and structural plans for details)
~
II
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
1\ i§;
-
I
II
I
I
I
I
II. I
III I
,
'-I t-I"
~4
1
X II I (
ApproveA 5f' ~t'\ 15
Or'\ ~III ~ { q q
Or J.J Y'\"'-.f'\CL ó< 3 ~
:>
c
IX
CL
CL
~
,
,.. 16'
-,
N
z
o
iñ
~
IX
65'
I
ŒJŒJŒJ[QJ
D.,i6. c..t.
.. ..... ....... ......."
1
6'-2Jt
.1
.....
. .
.
.
25' 0' 2S' so'
I I I
Scale 1-= SO'
100'
I
L6.I
~
~.
Q
ö
z
DETAIL 8
~
I
_yo
I
EXPO DESIGN
CEN TER
LEGEND
PRECAST PANEL
AINTED WITH
TEXTURED SURFACE
PP
GW
WH
'NY
iP
Pow.. Pole
Guy WIre
Wanhole
Wat.. Valve
releahcne Pede8tal
.
Pz-
99-'-/6
NRH
APPLICATION FOR A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
City of North Richland Hills
7301 NE Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas
817-581-5500
(Please print or type all responses)
PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
5
t i (ì'
. tJ~ ~£L5,f.
City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent:
Telephone number of applicant / agent:
-8'5 t't (13/7 . 5- 75/0
PART 2.
J)
Telephone number of property owner:
TIJ4N1n- 3ò 311
Note: Attach letter or affidavit from property owner if different from applicant / agent:
Surveyor map attached as required by application:
i i Yes D No
PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner:
DYes U2(" No
Current zoning classification:
[-;2
Describe ~at~re of the propose~ activity and any particular characteristics related to the use of ~he property:
k¿;; U..H~..e $" h LA" 'ÂÛW'N tf;U,Su)/J I
Proposed use of the property:
cK /2 -/p ,L
LuJ),
( £-Y:po J)£S"~/J C£rIIEtL - 4C¡ooJ)I4U,s.!3LvcP. )
Attach site plan which conforms with requirements included in this packet:
n Yes i I No
Attach affidavit from property owner if applicant is not owner:
DYes
DNa
Date of Planning & Zoning Commission Public Hearing:
Taxes Paid?
I ! Yes
DNo
Fee:
Date: ~.LJJ qo¡
I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the property
described above and do hereby submit this request for approval of a
Special Use Permit to the Planning and Zoning Commission for con
ð
Print Name:
,-J
Signature:
PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date of City Council Public Hearing:
Uens Paid?
DYes
DNO
Special Use Permit Approved:
~ Yes No
'----.l
Assessments Paid?
Ii Yes I I No
$300.00
lditions of Approval:
This application will not be
scheduled for public hearing
until application fee is received.
Special Use Permit
CD - 414 (2196)
- .,.- -- ~- .. .. ._.."_...._,,-_._.~--- " "---'---;--r-¡ ¡ v i V V I" J ¡ ¡, I, ) I r ,f I,
-=-=-- - - -'./ - - - - V ~ ~ " ,...., 'r1" . . .
- ----- V -_____ V ___ V '.f \1
. TM NO V - 9 1QOQ
Des t g nee n t e r t9 ì
~4 ~/
~G INSPéC'\'P
;'¡-ovember 11, 1999
Ms. Ciady Boykin
CGS Signs
7343 Tower Strcet
Ft. WoItÌL TX 761 IS
Re; EXPO Desígn Center~.1tichland:Hills 25' Pylon Along Grapevlne Highwa.y
De;.u Cindy:
Pkase acc~"pt this ¡ett!:.'! as authorization to sign the required dOCUIn~nts to ameIld tht Special C"sc Pe:rm.it
with respect to the above referenc\:d sign-
Thank you for your 35sista.n;e in this m~ttcr.
Project Manager
cC; Ca.thy Scott
2455 Paces Ferry Road N. W:, Atlanta, Georgia 30339-4024 TelephoJU! 77Q/433-8211
.. HOMII: QEf"ClT t::QMPAN'I'
,"-.
,to'
O:'....m;.,i ~,.~.; ·:·e
F"OUnd,::~!}J_
. t---
Ei'i. t--- 0
--!,:.::"'¡ji,-
1----1 ..¡i,;,-
5 --l 'C,'i1';;
..",¡IV!~I
c,
1----1 '" ,...
a.. Co" - 0
~um... ~'::'<~~
found _
- '. r--
\
\\
\
\\
\
u
, \
t\
\ Bra.. Co ':"
"anum.. ':'"
\ Found
~
~
VESTIBULE:
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ f--
\ E::
\ -
\ -
\ f--
\ -
\ -
\ =
\ r--
¡r Ie--" ==
'\ =
\ f--
\ -
\=
\ -
\ f--
\ ---
\-
::--
r~~~
\ >--
\ - l
I M ==-UGHT POlE
\ ... - (T'rP.)
.' \ 1-, /111
\'J~"
-
<=
1':\ ~
- ...,-
-e
~
i
--(\...
(l0) ~
.
',J)
/ '-
~
p,
r--
(l2,) ~
-
" '.
.
,
w
I
¡ ~..
,;?
-
....
¡DUST COlLECTOR
~11~r
II::-- ".n nn"
.--
~
~
,
~
I
D.II,. C..I.,.
.. .... ...... .........
"'" 1I1I..ðO
¿..,~="~~
MECHANICAL UNITS (T'rP.)
APPROXIMA TE
COUNTERTOP
SHOP --..
LOCA TlON \
~
00
~~
I."''''''''
, No.. ~
r" '''':''#1'',,,,,,,,.
r.)k\", v
blj'!. f' 11'; :.
Ul10· ~i;¡ .',
ji,
/,ERWITTEO OUTSIDE DISPLAY ...RE...'-....... 0 s III ~;?:y:
/ n _ ~ '" """:¡'c,.
~~~ VESTIBULE: ~~~~~'" ,~~""''''''I 0 ..,1".'; ./~~;~-::.
.'" '" ",. " '" "" VESTIBULE: ~~ ~,,;. ~
~ -~- - - - _:::J.. ~:.",,'
~'~r ':'~': .q~ c'
~1'"
V'~
_ I ~
(lO) ~ '1'\ (í0' - Ai;;, .( REM ~INDE
~ UJ .ÆÆ',;' " ~ LOT <, BLC
AC ~-ffí'~~ '~'., CLE"'R {JEW ..
::1.0 r ,,' Volume 3f'8-14
LQL,t RIOCI< 1 - A.i, X " ( PRTC;
~ t1L;~ / ~"
~ T'J/ /' '" PROPO ~
ill n}' . dJ{// Ú", IGN . . "
3 .' _.~' "?~ "'1'\ b, ,
Y,' ;:)L" '7 /' 1{J~, .~;}j ........!!\.
= 'c ' _ / /' ~~, '\. ¡, '¿ti)( :.":i-..... __
- ('-.~' ~'), "'t'i'\e/./.
~ / ~OT1A.8LOC (1 ~'~ /.
~~ 0.76'" ACRES '''b,\: /.
~/ N 86·...9·39· W '/.
~ " ',' 28,29' /. ':~
, 'X'yt '?(
~, 'x''éut: ./ /'~..d \>.
, Foun. /' Þ': 0 '/
· /~~~~:øQ/ /
'\. <A /
//.....~ / /
{:,\ / /...CI .cB'" '. /
oÓ ~ IÞ'
oÓ IÞ'
(¡)t':\
---
oÓl ¡J IÞ'
r.\ ~
.......
,
,
'\
oÓ~ IÞo
r.\ '-'
- 'iir
,
.1i9J tfõ\
:!'Xe' CURllEO TR Œ
- (
--< >--
(3) ~-
}
-
-
. .' !:'~/4
..·ø'1-..,..·~)
~.....,
" ,
"0
, . '
ORDINANCE NO. 2446
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
TO AMEND THE SIGNAGE OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR ON-SITE
CUSTOM CUTTING OF COUNTERTOPS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE
NO. 2382; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a
recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by
changing said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, in case number PZ 99-40, the Special Use Permit for an On-Site custom Cutting
of Countertops be hereby amended allowing a revision to Sign uB" on the property
described as follows:
Lot 1 R, Block 1, Venture Addition (4900 Davis Boulevard)
2.
THAT, development of this property shall be consistent with the site plan attached as
Exhibit "A."
3.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City
Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance
are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this
ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not
affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this
ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section.
Ordinance No, 2446
Page 1 of 4
4.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Zoning Ordinance of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save
and except as amended by this Ordinance.
5.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage,
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF
DECEMBER 1999.
Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission
Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 10TH DAY OF JANUARY
2000.
Charles Scoma, Mayor
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Department Head
Ordinance No, 2446
Page 2 of 4
APPROVED AS TO ORM AND LEGALITY:
Ordinance No. 2446
Page 3 of 4
Exhibit "A"
Ordinance No, 2446
Page 4 of 4
Draft Copy
16.
PZ 99-40
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIER THE REQUEST OF CGS SIGNS TO AMEND
THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR LOT 1 R, BLOCK 1, VENTURE ADDITION,
RELATIVE TO SIGNAGE. THE PROPERTY IS THE EXPO DESIGN CENTER
AND IS LOCA TED AT 4900 DAVIS BOULEVARD.
APPROVED
CGS, Signs has submitted a revised pole sign elevation for the approved 25 foot
pole sign proposed along Grapevine Highway, The Special Use Permit for on-
site custom cutting of counter tops was approved by City Council on April 12,
1999 by Ordinance No. 2382, The physical layout of the Expo Design Center is
not changing. The only proposed change is to the pole sign elevation. The
property is zoned C-2, Commercial with a Special Use Permit. The property is
designated as commercial on the Future Land Use Plan,
The Special Use Permit approved two pole signs, one on each street frontage.
The existing sign on Davis Boulevard is 65 feet high and contains 396 square
feet of sign area. The proposed sign "B" on Grapevine Highway is 25 foot high
sign, containing 98,6 square feet of message area.
The applicant proposes to keep the same message area, however the sign
structure is proposed to be changed, The width of the structure is proposed to
increase from 16 feet wide to 26'-4" wide. The increase in the width is for
aesthetic appeal so that it will match the appearance of the Expo Design Center
building,
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the revised
pole sign elevation for the Special Use Permit for Expo Design at 4900 Davis
Boulevard on Lot 1 R, Block 1, Venture Addition,
Chairman Bowen opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come
forward,
Ms. Cindy Boydkin, CGS Signs presented this request. She stated the outside
structure of the sign would match the building. She stated that increase is
basically for aesthetic purposes,
Chairman Bowen called for additional proponents, Seeing none, he called for
opponents.
Mr, Billy Cypert, 6304 Edinburgh, expressed concern over the lighting of the sign.
It was explained that the illumination of the sign will not change from what was
originally approved.
Seeing no additional opponents, the public hearing was closed,
P & Z Minutes
November 11, 1999
20
Draft Copy
Mr. Nehring, seconded by Mr. Blue moved to approve PZ 99-40. The motion
carried unanimously.
P & Z Minutes
November 11, 1999
21
s'
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
',--
Department: Planning & Inspections Department
Council Meeting Date: 01/10/00
Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Carrera Agenda Number: PZ 99-41
Consulting Engineers, Inc, for a Zoning Change on Tract 4P1, out of the A.G. Walker
Survey, Abstract No. 1630 from R-7-MF-Multi Family to C2-Commercial. (Located at
4004 Flory Street) - Ordinance 2447
CASE SUMMARY
Carrera Consulting Engineers, Inc., has submitted a zoning change request for Mr.
Feliciano Padron to rezone a total" .60 acres from R-7-MF to C2 Commercial. The owner,
Mr. Padron, would like to operate his lawn service business at this site. The property is
undeveloped and unplatted and will be required to be platted prior to the issuance of any
building permits. The proposed rezoning is in compliance with the Future Land Use Plan.
Mr. Padron owns the separate triangular shaped tract to the north that contains 3,092
square feet and is zoned C-2-Commercial. The tract is undevelopable because of its size
and it does not have access to a public street. If this request is approved, all of his
contiguous property will be zoned C2 and could be platted as a single lot.
Surroundina Future & Existina Land Uses
The subject property is designated as Commercial.
\..
'-"
North:
South:
East:
West:
Future Land Use
Commercial
Commercial
High Density Residential
Commercial
Existing Land Use
City Drainage Easement & ABC Wrecker Service
Keystone Body Shop
Residential
Vacant
RECOMMENDA TION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their public hearing on December 9, 1999,
recommended approval of PZ 99-41 by a vote of 7 to O.
To approve Ordinance 2447 and PZ 99-41 as recommended by the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
'--,
~
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Oth r
Finance Director
~~~
City Manager Signature
\\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1 \DATA\PZ\Cases\PZ Cases\PZ 99-41-41 Carrera Consulting Engineers.doc
Page 1 of 1
, :>..;:' . -
tQic.i.)
~
·r)
.
MANOR DR
': 1; 14: ~
19 n
> r
18 a
~ t;
'7 >
'J
6 0 .. ~
a '"
r;
( > TR,iA_
arc
15! 3 0
'" -'
lOR ...
~
'ò
---------
'OA Yo
\.;'¿' ~ ~
'\t\ G.
~O~í)\)\'\ 1
m.2B4A
'F
C-1
r R.2S4
c-
i~!
.. .
_ R.=.3
1720
..
...
..
'~.
I ...
'I!..:D' " 1A -, '2B
<;:4 iR 4r
,
- 13 -v.
TR. - '-<...4Wl
,q.2O: :I). 2P1 '',.\
~~.4M
:R:
S
2255
C Q)~?-.
'11) >
.J¡ ';::
., c
e-;-· ~
0
IJ c:
en
.æ
::J
cr:
5.A aD
-
>
n ~ ""
~ .....
"' "'"
sea
.... 0 a "'"
'" .... a ...,
"' .... ...
>
II'
....
15
D
lOt
".
'6
..
;¿
"
-1:8-
TR.....
'F'
R-7-M
T~.4NI
r~.4W
rR.4.T'
.,.. 'v0" .
é:'-\..~~
Ù" ~'-
i
1m i", \ tM
,.
"
.W
3
,;¡
:R 'í!=!.
2C5 i 2G5
-~.
TP..:J-nA
-. ..,--.-. -?'
F
C-2
1549
"
R-3
1-7-6
'ê-
R-7-MF lit
(')
:III
'1<4' C
~
~
""
-, ;.\." ()
., -
=r
:( ___t -i'.
--. - -- ... .... .-.
'~,
r>¡'') m TIt
XJ V~: 2C5 I 2G6
;! :
TI<
2G7 'i :
I « /
I _
~'7;~;['1 I
. Harmonson Road
.:' .,?"
'r\ 't,.
- ~ \)\1 <C.
:.... _ C-2
\('Ï <\::
:)
--
HAR
",,-~. ....::..~
50<
\\
'>
rP.3.U
rP.
:::"-4'"
'\
.., V\\1.\1.~
,¡,c
TR.3M
.,
.¡!f-'
#
f'R...:M::)
TR.
2U
LR
r~.;
'!1J'......:
"'... ,
rø4L
"
4L
.')
....
PZ 99-41
4004 FLORY STREET
ZONING CHANGE MF TO C2
~ ~ '.4 :J
ONYX DR N
\.,Q\....~
-'
1
~I
~
'IY
.,
.'
..) "', ~ ' Ii
-"
.,
r~ ~ 19
, '^,
~ ?-c~~ í'-'9'
I~'~~_ 2 ~ æ
JR
/
JANN'E ST i
~ - '0 " I
2
" .. " .,. -- " '., .. 2'ó1 i
...
Z
MARIE ST t
,-;..-
-,
'.
;:oJ
..
IJ
Draft Copy
17.
PZ 99-41
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF CARRERA
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACT 4P1,
OUT OF THE A.G. WALKER SURVEY, A-1630 FROM R7-MULTI-FAMILY TO
C2-COMMERCIAL. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 4004 FLORY
STREET.
APPROVED
Carrera Consulting Engineers, Inc., has submitted a zone change request for Mr.
Feliciano Padron to rezone a total 1.60 acres. Mr, Padron would like to operate
his lawn service business- 5-Star Lawn Service at this site. The property is
unplatted at this time and will be required to be platted prior to any building
construction. The property is currently undeveloped at this time, The proposed
rezoning is in compliance with the Future Land Use Plan.
Mr. Padron owns the triangular shaped tract to the north that contains 3,092
square feet and is zoned C-2-Commercial. This same tract is undevelopable
because of its' size and it does not have access to a public street. If this request
is approved all of his property will be zoned the same thing and they could be
platted as one piece of property,
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve PZ 99-41 to
rezone Tract 4P1out of the A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630 from R-7-MF-
Multi Family to C-2-Commercial at 4004 Flory Street.
Chairman Bowen opened the public hearing and called for proponents, Seeing
none and seeing no opponents, the public hearing was closed,
Staff stated that one letter of support had been received and were included in the
Commissioners packets. This letter of support was from Glen Carlin of 3936
Flory Street.
Mr. Tolbert, seconded by Mr. Welch, moved to approve PZ 99-41. The
motion carried unanimously.
P & Z Minutes
November 11, 1999
22
Case #: PZ 99-41
CARRERA CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Procedure to Respond:
ASr~~~, perty Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract or an interested citize , I (approve)
(Pi ~) and/or (have the following comments):
Print Name: JJ~ ç. f(,lI-sSELL.
Print Address, or Lot, Block and Subdivision: 3 7;;,1 "')' c R ~s ]) f .J
Signature: ~1} t'~ Phone No{t/7)~--ÐJJ7
Direct questions and mail responses to:
Planning Department
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
7301 N E Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76180
Telephone: (817) 427-6300
Fax: (817)427-6404
L:\Property Owner Notificatin\PZ 99-4 I-Property Owner Letter,doc
NI~H City of North Richland Hills
APPLICATION FOR A 7301 NE Loop 820
ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE North Richland Hills, Texas
(Please print or type all responses) 817-581-5500
'ART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of applicant / agent:
C. ARR<é.tz,.A C.O VI S U L- ...C\ Ñ(;¡ ~ÑG.l\'1~~1i. I )~c.
Stœet addœss of applicant/agent:
3~30 Nìe.RE:~ITH At.)c. '
City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: Telephone number of applicant / agent:
DAL..L.A-S t~, -rSZII (214 ') 330-4771
PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION
Stœet address at location where zoning district change is being œquested:
4004- FL.OR'1' ~YTR't..U - -
Legal Description of Property wheœ zoning district change is being œquested:
T~AC..'T 4 P\ , (/'1'-+ ùf -t ~e A. r:., ~ LJ A \... It. E: I~ ~URU~"", A D":.T rA<:..T "-30. l~ so, 1A.t'r<.",1 Co. '>'\'¡(
Current zoning classification: Proposed zoning classification: Proposed use of the property:
~F c.2- lAW"-I SE.R'Jt<..E.
Reason for zoning district change:
o~e II'~TE. L.AW",- SerUt~ 15<..,H ( "I ~ 5 '5.
SUNey or map attached as required by application: Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner:
: XJ Yes DNo DYes 0 No
~RT 3, PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
fvãme of property owner:
FEL.lC l A r-JO PA DR. ON
Street address of property owner:
\\00 MONTEI<RfY Si-
City / State / Zip Code of property owner: Telephone number of property owner:
ße: \:>\-'012. ì> ) \e,.,AS ìCoO'lL (6l1) 545 - 0"34- Cc
Note: Attach letter or affidavit from property owner if different from applicant / agent:
I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the property
Jò l.)e Ino-P ߀ 12. l'3~~ described above and do hereby submit this request for approval of a
Date: t8 zoning district change to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration,
Print Name: ~L..lClA~6 Þ~D RON Signature: j¡. ~;t~
PART 4, FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ,
Date ,f :;{nl ~ Z¡i'q qmmiSSion Public Hearing: Taxes Paid? Case Number:
[J Yes [~NO {/'Z.. Cf Cf - L/ I
Date of City Council Public Hearing: Fee:
DYes ¡ __J No
Zoning District Change Approved: $300.00
, Yes r--1 ' l Yes l-.J No
' I No
'-- .--
tions of Approval: This application will not be
scheduled for public hearing
until application fee is received,
Zoning District Change
CD - 407 (2197)
~_~_______.^___~__,..~.~._,_ . _._.___~,~_^_..._~_,.,.___,,_.____.~_.__~,~__...___._.",__M+'"~~~_"_'__'____'_
LAND USE STATEHENT FOR
APPLICATION OF ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE
Applicant............ Feliciano Padron, DBA 5-Star Lawn Service
Applicant's Address.. 1100 Monterrey Street
Bedford, Texas 76022
Property............. Tract 4P1, 1.60 Acre of land
and the 3092.73 SF area of land north of
the northeast corner of Tract 4P1
Property Address..... 4004 Flory Stree~
Current Zoning....... MF
Proposed zoning...... C2
The purpose of this application for a Zoning District Change is
to allow 5-Star Lawn Service, a commercial business, to operate
its business out of this location.
The existing land use on the area of request is MF. The adjoining
properties are zoned Commercial.
The proposed land use on the area of request is a lawn service,
consisting of office & warehouse use.
The total property area is 1.6 acres plus a 3092.73 square feet
area of land at the northeast corner of this tract. Included with
the 1.6 acre tract, is an existing drainage easement, and a
3485.67 square feet area of land deeded to the City of North
Richland Hills, as recorded in Volume 6357, Page 848, Deed
Records, Tarrant County, Texas.
A new building for this lawn service business is planned to be
constructed in accordance with the City of North Richland Hills
requirements.
ORDINANCE NO. 2447
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1874 OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, GRANTING ZONING CHANGE
Z99-41 ON A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE A.G. WALKER SURVEY,
ABSTARACT NO. 1630, DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY,
LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE;
ORDERING A CHANGE IN THE USE OF SAID TRACT FROM "R-7-MF"
MULTI FAMILY DISTRICT TO "C2" COMMERCIAL DISTRICT;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL
OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A
CLAUSE RELATING TO SEVERABILlTL Y; DETERMINING THAT THE
PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND A
ZONING CHANGE AND AMENDMENT THEREIN MADE; PROVIDING A
PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED
DOLLARS ($200) FOR EACH OFFENSE, AND A SEPARATE OFFENSE
SHALL BE DEEMED COMMITTED EACH DAY DURING OR ON WHICH
AN OFFENSE OCCURS OR CONTINUES; AND PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, applications were made to amend the Official Zoning Map, City of
North Richland Hills, Texas by making applications for same with the Planning and
Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas as required by State
statutes and the zoning ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills and all the legal
requirements, conditions and prerequisites having been complied with, the case having
come before the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas after all legal
notices, requirements conditions and prerequisites having been complied with; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas at a public
hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a
determination as to whether this requested change should be granted or denied; safety
of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately
surrounding the site; safety from fire hazards and measures for fire control, protection of
adjacent property from flood or water damages, noise producing elements and glare of
the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of
the neighborhood, location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic
control and adjacent property, street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate
neighborhood, adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for
off-street parking facilities, location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-
street locating spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas
to control dust, effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare, effect on light
and air, the effect on the transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills at a public
hearing called by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas did consider
the following factors in making a determination as to whether this requested change
Ordinance No, 2447
Page 1 of 5
should be granted or denied; effect on the congestion of the streets, the fire hazards,
panics and other dangers possibly present in the securing of safety from same, the
effect on the promotion of health and general welfare, the effect on adequate light and
air, the effect on the overcrowding of the land, the effect on the concentration of
population, the effect on the transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other
public facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further considered among other things the
character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses and with the view to
conserve the value of buildings, encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout
this city; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas does find
that there is a public necessity for the zoning change, that the public demands it, that
the public interest clearly requires the amendment, that the zoning changes do not
unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with
reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was
made; and does find that the change in zoning lessens the congestion in the streets,
helps secure safety from fire, panic and other dangers; promotes health and the
general welfare; provides adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of land;
avoids undue concentration of population; facilitates the adequate provision of
transportation, water sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas has
determined that there is a necessity and need for this change in zoning and has also
found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property
surrounding and in close proximity to the property requested for a change since this
property was originally classified; and therefore, feels that a change in zoning
classification for the particular piece of property is needed, is called for, and is in the
best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the City North Richland Hills, Texas
and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
Section 1, That the City of North Richland Hills Ordinance No 1874, being the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, is hereby amended and
changed by Zoning Application PZ 99-41 to rezone the following described property to
wit: Being tract 4P1, containing 1.60 acre situated in the A.G, Walker Survey, Abstract
No. 1630, Deed Records of Tarrant County (located at 4004 Flory Street), more fully
and completely described by metes and bounds in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and
made a part hereof which was previously zoned "R-7-MF" Multi Family District to "C2"
Commercial District, all in accordance with Zoning Ordinance No, 1874 as amended,
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning
Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein
described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein,
Ordinance No, 2414
Page 2 of 5
Section 3. That in all other respects, the use of the tract or tracts of land herein
above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said City
of North Richland Hills zoning ordinances and all other applicable and pertinent
ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas.
Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have
been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting
health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been
designed with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably
anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future, to lessen congestion in the streets; to
secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers; provide adequate light and air;
to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population; facilitate
the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface
water, parks and other public requirements, and to make adequate provisions for the
normal business, commercial needs and development of the community. They have
been made with reasonable consideration, among other things, of the character of the
district, and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving
the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the
community.
Section 5. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the
provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those
ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance,
Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to
be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or
tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect
the validity of the zoning of the balance of the tract or tracts of land described herein.
Section 7, Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum
not to exceed two hundred dollars ($200,00) and a separate offense shall be deemed
committed upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues.
Section 8. The fact that the present ordinances and regulations of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, are inadequate to properly safeguard the health, safety,
morals, peace and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, creates an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public business,
property, health, safety and general welfare of the public which requires that this
ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its final passage, and it is
accordingly so ordained,
Ordinance No. 2414
Page 3 of 5
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THE 9th DAY OF
DECEMBER 1999.
r-/4 /~I fh
Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission
~d~
Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 10th DAY OF JANUARY
2000.
Mayor
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APAR»VED AS TO CONTENT:
I I
¡
,1
Plan~ Velor
Ordinance No. 2414
Page 4 of 5
Exhibit "A" of Ordinance 2447
Ordinance No, 2414
Page 5 of 5
Draft Copy
17.
PZ 99-41
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF CARRERA
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACT 4P1,
OUT OF THE A.G. WALKER SURVEY, A-1630 FROM R7 -MUL TI-FAMIL Y TO
C2-COMMERCIAL. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 4004 FLORY
STREET.
APPROVED
Carrera Consulting Engineers, Inc" has submitted a zone change request for Mr.
Feliciano Padron to rezone a total 1,60 acres. Mr. Padron would like to operate
his lawn service business- 5-Star Lawn Service at this site, The property is
unplatted at this time and will be required to be platted prior to any building
construction, The property is currently undeveloped at this time, The proposed
rezoning is in compliance with the Future Land Use Plan,
Mr. Padron owns the triangular shaped tract to the north that contains 3,092
square feet and is zoned C-2-Commercial. This same tract is undevelopable
because of its' size and it does not have access to a public street. If this request
is approved all of his property will be zoned the same thing and they could be
platted as one piece of property.
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve PZ 99-41 to
rezone Tract 4P1out of the A.G, Walker Survey, Abstract 1630 from R-7-MF-
Multi Family to C-2-Commercial at 4004 Flory Street.
Chairman Bowen opened the public hearing and called for proponents, Seeing
none and seeing no opponents, the public hearing was closed.
Staff stated that one letter of support had been received and were included in the
Commissioners packets, This letter of support was from Glen Carlin of 3936
Flory Street.
Mr. Tolbert, seconded by Mr. Welch, moved to approve PZ 99-41. The
motion carried unanimously.
P & Z Minutes
November 11, 1999
22
¡..
{~
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
'---
Department: PlanninQ & Inspections Department
Council Meeting Date: 01/10/00
Subject: Public HearinQ to Consider the ReQuest of Gravton Koenig Agenda Number: PZ 99-43
for a Zoning Change on Tract 2A04, S, Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from AG-
Agricultural and LR-Local Retail to R-1-S-Special Single Family Residential (Located at
7813 Green Valley Drive). Ordinance No. 2443
CASE SUMMARY
Mr. Grayton Koenig has submitted a zone change request to rezone 1.933 acres from AG-
Agricultural and LR-Local Retail to R-1-S-Special Single family Residential. The R-1-S
District requires a minimum lot size of 1 acre, minimum dwelling unit size of 2,300 square
feet, and allows the keeping of livestock in a residential setting. Adjacent to the west and
north is Green Valley Elementary School.
The property is zoned Commercial in the front and Agricultural in the rear. It is currently
used as an equestrian business. Mr. Koenig is interested in purchasing the property for
residential purposes and to keep a horse. Should the zoning be granted, Mr. Koenig will be
required to submit a preliminary and final plat prior to issuance of a building permit.
SURROUNDING FUTURE LAND USES
The subject property is designated as Low Density Residential.
North:
South:
East:
West:
Future Land Use
Public / Quasi-public
Low Density Residential
Low Density Residential
Public / Quasi-public
Surroundin Zonin
R2-Residential
R2-Residential
AG-Agricultural
R2-Residential
RECOMMENDATION:
At their meeting of December 9, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval of PZ 99-43 to rezone 7813 Green Valley Drive from AG-
Agricultural and LR-Local Retail to R-1-S-Special Single Family Residential by a vote of 7
to O.
To approve PZ 99-43 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission &
Ordinance No. 2443
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds AvallaDle
Finance Director
£6:~
City Manager Signature
L:\Cases\PZ Cases\PZ 99-43-41 Grady R1S.doc
Page 1 of 1
- SEE CTi~: 84-448 PGge: C2 )
;,¡iii""'-'-' -,-. -,----.---,,-,-.----,----,-.-.-.-
R-2-1800
1439
-.-.--.------'---- - -~ - -- - -- - --- -~ --------
-~----_._---
R-2
313
0-1
1320 lRACTA
R-2
1615
rn
4AB
R-7-MF
1189
'4 r-
Z
u
.,
. '"
TR.1A1
"
PZ 99-43 .,
7813 GREEN VALLEY DRIVE
ZONING CHANGE AG TO R-1-S
'"
c
~RìA
<J
'"
.
c
'"
:R2A
-
] ,"~~
~'ðd:'
-~¥:-I
¡2J
.
.
t-~
AG
~?t?Þ
~~ 1
p-'\\\~t 'R-1
'?> \~2.C23 4 7
~'G
CU-
o
a::: Green Valley
~ Elementary
¡¡::
~
~
E
en
R-2
1615
13
R-2
1'389
TR2A2
TR2AJ
~
"
"
c
TR.2B1
ÀG
iq2BJ
...
"
.
c
,'¿
,')\\J
,ß2.ð..\G
:::::::::::::::::.
..................
...............
..............
.............. ,',
o .. ..............
::::~1i$;;::::::
'.'~'... ......
.................
.................
....... ........
'9
TR.J
TR..:8 ~RjA 'ïUA 1
:::0
--
:J QR
.\\J" _c. Q
,. 0
o
.3 s ~ D
<II
<
jO ,12:
R-2
1175
R-3
'2
'3
¡-
<II
~
~ "
010,
... '
..
ID
""
C
r-
rn
~
o
__ ________ [~~olLJ; ------ ~.
ADOPTED: March 22. 1993 CURRENT THROUGH: Ordinance 2360, January 11, 1999
ZONING MAP Grid: 84-......... Pilge: C3
~.58
AG
'^
~).
112
i
...__ .."________ ____ _...1...11.- _...:.:
....---.
- SEE CT\~: 84-440 PGge: C4 )
NRH
City of North ~ch¡and Hills
APPLICATION FOR A
ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE
7301 NE Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas
(Please print 01' type all ,eopansea)
817-581-5500
PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of applicant / agent:
ko tE'/lJ /0
/()fJv l:>.5 ¿Æ),
;JIZII
71
761 rf {)
Telephone umber of applicant / agent:
ð/' -£S6-77Ä
'!>:R. AJ oilLr II ¡Z I C ¿/IN!? ///¿¿5" ;7;
76'ðò
5t/1Z tie
Proposed zoning classification:
7?Z.
Proposed use of the property:
L/t/65/"a!/é
/4Cre /0 r-
j?ß¡ ÞeïJ7 //f-L-
W Jj ~ f.z:, Ót..J¡/c! a ADm e OA.) 6it
hD15'50 ûllJ .{;ltc ?/o?er Iy
Surveyor map attached as required by application:
ø Yes D No
PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner:
j.gr Yes D No
Name of property owner:
2Jr:
Da
Q
Print Name: 6i¿f\Ÿ7óJJ ¿j)P-A./J&
PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date of Planning & Zoning Commission Public Hearing:
Taxes Paid?
DYes nNo
L....J
DYes DNO
DYes DNO
Case Number:
Date of City Council Public Hearing:
-43
Fee:
Zoning District Change Approved:
DYes D No
$300.00
fÁ.
Conditions of Approval:
This application will not be
scheduled for pUblic hearing
until application fee is received,
Zoning District Change
CD . 407 (2197)
ORDINANCE NO. 2443
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH
ARTICLE 2, SECTION 200, OF ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874,
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON
JUNE 14, 1999; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a change in zoning district boundaries;
and
WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing,' the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a
recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the
Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, in Case Number PZ 99-43 (Grayton Koenig), the following described tract as
shown on Exhibit "An shall be rezoned:
A tract of land, containing a total of 1,933 acres, in the S, Richardson Survey, Abstract
No, 1266, Tarrant County, Texas and addressed as 7813 Green Valley Drive, is hereby
changed from AG-Agricultural and LR-Local Retail to R-1-S-Special Single Family
Residential.
2.
THAT, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary
amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property
described herein,
3.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City
Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance
are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this
ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not
affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this
Ordinance 2443
Page I of4
ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section.
4.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF
DECEMBER 1999.
--ie) #~
~¿f! ~
Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission
Secretary, Planning and Z
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 10th DAY OF JANUARY
1999.
Mayor Charles Scoma
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Ordinance 2443
Page 2 of 4
Attorney for the
Ordinance 2443
Page 3 of 4
Exhibit "A"
GREEN VALLEY DRIVE
VARIABLE R.O.W.
VOL. , 2005, PC. '1104
O.R. T.C. T.
.. .
.
BEING A TRACT OF' LAND OUT OF' THE S,.,RICHARDSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1266, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS, AND BEING THE SAME TRACT OF...lAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 93~9, PA
77~,- DEED' RECORDS" TARRANT..;; COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING: AT'tA', CAPPEDtlRON PIN SET IN THE WEST LINE OF' A TRACT OF' LAND AS DESCRIBED IN
DEED RECORDED ¡ IN ~ VOLUME' 7116, PAGE 1062, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, FOR THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF'- TRACT BEING DESCRIBED, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE MOST EASTERLY
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GREEN VALLEY ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET
A. SLIDE 911, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES O~ MINUTES 21 SECONDS WEST 402.40 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE
OF SAID TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 71 16, PAGE 1062, TO A
CAPPED IRON PIN SET IN THE NORTH LINE OF' GREEN VALLEY DRIVE FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF TRACT BEING DESCRIBED;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST 210.45 FEET ALONG THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID GREEN VALLEY DRIVE TO A CAPPED IRON PIN SET FOR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
TRACT BEING DESCRIBED, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1, BLOCK
1, GREEN VALLEY ADDITION; ,_...
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST 399.74 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE
OF SAID LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GREEN VALLEY ADDITION TO A CAPPED IRON PIN SET FOR THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF TRACT BEING DESCRIBED, SAID POINT ALSO BEING AN INSIDE CORNER OF SAID LOT 1, .
BLOCK 1, GREEN VALLEY ADDITION;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 209.54 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GREEN VALLEY ADDITION TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING
1.933 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS
I CharI.. 8. HOOk.. Jr. RPLS. hereby certify ~h.t thi. lurvey va. ~de on the ground under ~ lupervia10n and correct]
line. d1menl1ona and ar.. of the land indicated thereon. the locaCion ot all 1mprov...ntl, the locatSon ot all alley..
...emen~. and other ~tt.r. of record which affect the property. the underl1gned rurther certitie. that there are no '
4__'.._þ_ -...-.~--...... '- -..-- ......-....-.. .,-- ---.....,-... ...________...__... ........,___.__ _, ._.._..____.... ......_.._............... ..4......,
Ordinance 2443
Page 4 of 4
"'__"__"'_~N____......
Draft Copy
19.
PZ 99-43
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF GRA YTON KOENIG
FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACT 2A04, A-1266, S. RICHARDSON
SURVEY, ADDRESSED AS 7813 GREEN VALLEY DRIVE FROM AG-
AGRICULTURAL AND LR-LOCAL RETAIL TO R1S-SPECIAL SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
APPROVED
Mr. Gray ton Koenig has submitted a zone change request to rezone 1.933 acres
from AG-Agricultural and LR-Local Retail to R-1-S-Special Single Family
Residential. The R-1-S District requires a minimum lot size of 1 acre, minimum
dwelling unit size of 2,300 square feet, and allows the keeping of livestock in a
residential setting. Adjacent to the west and north is Green Valley Elementary
School.
The property is zoned Local Retail in the front and Agricultural in the rear. It is
currently used as an equestrian business. Mr. Koenig is interested in purchasing
the property for residential purposes and to keep a horse. Should the zoning be
granted, Mr. Koenig will be required to submit a preliminary and final plat prior to
issuance of a building permit.
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve PZ 99-43 to
rezone 7813 Green Valley Drive on tract 2A04, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract
1266 from AG-Agricultural and LR-Local Retail to R-1-S-Special Single Family
Residential.
Responding to a question, Ms. Ratcliff stated that no screening would be
required between the proposed residence and the school property. Any
screening would be at Mr. Koenig's discretion.
Chairman Bowen opened the public hearing and called the applicant forward.
Gray ton Koenig, applicant stated he was purchasing the property for a residence
and wanted to be allowed to keep a horse.
Seeing no additional proponents and no opponents, the public hearing was
closed.
Mr. Lueck, seconded by Mr. Blue, moved to approve PZ 99-43. The motion
carried unanimously.
P & Z Minutes
November 11, 1999
25
',--
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning & Inspections Department
Council Meeting Date: 01/10/00
Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Mary Jane and Agenda Number: PZ 99-44
Edward Lett for a Zoning Change on tracts 2A3, 2AB3, and 2A3C1, W.C. Newton
Survey Abstract 1182, addressed as 7591 and 7601 Precinct Line Road from AG-
Agricultural to PD-Planned Development for a Wedding Chapel and other associated
accessory wedding chapel uses. - Ordinance 2448
CASE SUMMARY
Mr. Edward Lett is requesting to rezone three tracts of land containing approximately 5.77
acres on Precinct Line Road from ÃG-Agricultural to PD-Plannèd Development for a
wedding chapel and other associated accessory wedding chapel uses. The property is
currently developed with a single family structure and a one story frame building. Mr. Lett
is proposing to develop a wedding chapel and use the existing house with future additions.
He is requesting a Planned Development District designation to address the concerns
expressed with his application earlier this year. Please see the attached Planning and
Zoning Commission Minutes of PZ 99-12 from the May 13 and May 27 meetings.
Attached to the application is a specific outline of the purpose, permitted uses, permitted
structures and amenities, lot and area requirements, and general conditions for the
proposed development. This information is formulated into the ordinance.
The applicant proposes to develop a small chapel and reception building replacing the
existing small frame structure and to phase the parking lot construction as the
development expands. The property is adjacent to the Little Bear Creek, which is under the
regulations of the Little Bear Creek Flood Plain Control Ordinance No. 2091. The small
chapel extends into the Little Bear Creek Flood Control area (shown as the solid line on
the site plan labeled as the ultimate100 year flood line). Mr. Lett has noted the chapel will
be elevated on piers. This would be allowed in the Little Bear Creek Flood Control area
as long as the lowest chord is 18 inches above the ultimate base flood elevation. The
pavilions do not pose a problem as long as they are not fenced. in or enclosed in any form
or fashion and that the finished floor elevations shall be within 6 inches of the natural
ground. The required 6 foot masonry fence at the rear of the property is a problem. The
area is heavily treed and placing a 6 foot masonry wall is in violation of the Little Bear
Creek Flood Control Ordinance. In the amendments proposed to Article 10, Fencing, staff
has recommended that screening and fencing requirements in the Little Bear Creek
Corridor be exempted. If the amendments are approved then this will be a non-issue.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Ot er
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Finance Director
~·c~~
City Marmger Signature
L:\Cases\PZ Cases\PZ 99-44-42-Lett PD Wedding Chapel.doc
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
The site plan shows two driveway entrances on the subject property, approximately 242
feet apart, which is a violation of the Public Works Design Manual. The requirement for
driveway placement distance on a minor arterial thoroughfare is 300 feet. The applicant is
requesting approval of his driveways with this site plan. The southern most drive can not
be developed further south because of the Little Bear Creek Corridor. The residential
property to the north has an existing driveway on its southern boundary, which is just north
of this development. Staff is recommending one driveway entrance for this development in
accordance with the Public Works Design Manual.
Additionally, the applicant is requesting to be allowed to use the existing septic system in
lieu of tying into the City's sewer at this time. This is not necessarily a zoning issue, but a
platting issue. Staff recommends !hat the applicant be ti~d into the city sewer with this
development just like all other new developments.
Staff recommends that if this application is approved, the ordinance should include a
limitation on the hours of operation for outside activities to end by 11 :00 p.m. like the public
parks.
The total building coverage is proposed to be 10, 943 square feet, which is 4% of the lot.
The total proposed landscaped area is 207,481 square feet, which is 83 per cent of the
lot. The applicant is required to provide 70 off-street parking spaces for the ultimate
development. He will develop the off-street parking lot per phase of development.
Surrounding Future Land Uses and Existina Land Uses
The subject property is designated as Low Density Residential on the Future Land Use
Plan.
North:
South:
East:
West:
Surrounding land Use
Low Density Residential
Low Density Residential & Commercial
City of Hurst
Low Density Residential
Existing Zoning & land Uses
AG - Single Family Residential
AG - Undeveloped
Future Church Site
AG - Single Family Residential
RECOMMENDA TION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their public hearing on December 9, 1999,
recommended aDproval of PZ 99-44 to rezone the subject property from Agricultural to
Planned Development for wedding chapel and other associated accessory wedding chapel
uses by a vote of 7 to 0 with the following conditions:
· The development is tied to the site plan.
· The ordinance include the proposed regulations submitted by the applicant with the
exception that wooden decorative fencing not be allowed.
· Include a notation on the site plan that all the pavilions and gazebos will be built in
accordance with the Little Bear Creek Flood Plain Control Ordinance No. 2091.
· The future land use plan be amended to reflect the subject property as commercial
· The site plan be amended to show either a living screen or a masonry screening wall
along the northern property line outside of the Little Bear Creek Corridor.
· Recommend City Council waives the zoning case 'fees the applicant has already paid.
To deny Ordinance No. 2448 and PZ 99-44.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
L:\Cases\PZ Cases\PZ 99-44-42-Lett PD WedolllY "'m:lp~l.uuc
Page 2 of 2
--..-.---.-..-....--... -_...
-----..----
- .------. ---_··_------------1-----1-------
AG I ~œ I
I I
! TR15
Tlt~
TR.~A5
..
.~.:ii~.......
:::::.........::::~:
:::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::
:.::::::::::::::::::.
:::::::!Ø::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::
....................
...~::,;:.... ...
:::~~jI::::::
:::::.:.:::.:.:::::: .
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. .
:::::::::.:.:.:.:.:: 1
.........:.:.:.:.:..
::::::::::....:.:.:
..........~.:.:.
..................
.:.:.:.:..........
-R.:6Aj TR.IBAS
~
"
:R.I:5A..3
·R.18A
~"5.1.4
TR.6,U
-:"R:t::1
-."
'ó
"
o. ~
AG
!f.1I
-~(J]lif!}/¡ .
~~!Y.
C-1 °ll(/
2151
C-1
2151
~ t
~ ~:
,)
=
0(
..
~ --1
=
PZ 99-44
7601,7605,7591 PRECINCT LINE ROAD
REQUEST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RE-
ZONING
"
-~~
8 ..
-~
7 \M)- 25
~~""f'
3JI:Y -:Oo¿,ß0
J ~o
--C ..'
:,0
~-1. _~
1993 CURRENT THROUGH: Ordinance 2360,
ZONING MAP Grid: 90-....0
I"C
ns
o
c:::
Q)
c:
::¡
-
(.)
c:
'(3 R.
~
10..
TR2
TR2C
.
r I
"
~
TR2
'"
~
:!
..
>-
!;: '"
u
'" !:
.. ~
..
: >-
c !:
z u
~ ...
:¡; '"
u ..
:;>
. :¡;
:¡;
...
.
0
z
1"RAC':' :
9-
1
~L.JL._~._
- GIS Divisio" 19 Jan 99 17:Ui:.38 Tu..day
%otlos.mol).oml. zatlas.grid.aml plot·.4 _bw.rtl
Draft Copy
20.
PZ99-44
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF MARY JANE AND
EDWARD lETT FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACTS 2A3 AND 2A3, W.C.
NEWTON SURVEY, A-1182, ADDRESSED AS 7591 AND 7601 PRECINCT
LINE ROAD FROM AG-AGRICUl TURAl TO PD-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
FOR A WEDDING CHAPEL AND OTHER ASSOCIATED ACCESSORY
WEDDING CHAPEL USES.
APPROVED
Mr. Edward Lett is requesting to rezone three tracts of land containing
approximately 5.77 acres on Precinct Line Road from AG-Agricultural to PD-
Planned Development for a wedding chapel and other associated accessory
wedding chapel uses. The property is currently developed with a single family
structure and a one story frame building. Mr. Lett is proposing to develop a
wedding chapel and use the existing house with future additions. He is
requesting a Planned Development District designation to address the concerns
expressed with his application earlier this year.
The applicant proposes to develop a small chapel and reception building
replacing the existing small frame structure and to phase the parking lot
construction as the development expands. The small chapel extends into the
Little Bear Creek Flood Control area. Mr. Lett has noted the chapel will be
elevated on piers. This would be allowed in the Little Bear Creek Flood Control
area as long as the lowest chord is 18 inches above the ultimate base flood
elevation. The pavilions do not pose a problem as long as they are not fenced in
or enclosed in any form or fashion and that the finished floor elevations shall be
within 6 inches of the natural ground. The required 6 foot masonry fence at the
rear of the property is a problem. The area is heavily treed and placing a 6 foot
masonry wall is in violation of the Little Bear Creek Flood Control Ordinance. In
the amendments proposed to Article 10, Fencing, staff has recommended that
fencing requirements in the Little Bear Creek Corridor be exempted. If the
amendments are approved then this will be a non-issue.
The site plan shows two driveway entrances on the subject property,
approximately 242 feet apart, which is a violation of the Public Works Design
Manual. The requirement for driveway placement distance on a minor arterial
thoroughfare is 300 feet. The applicant is requesting approval of his driveways
with this site plan. The southern most drive can not be developed further south
because of the Little Bear Creek Corridor. The residential property to the north
has an existing driveway on its southern boundary, which is just north of this
development. Staff is recommending one driveway entrance for this
development in accordance with the Public Works Design Manual.
Additionally, the applicant is requesting to be allowed to use the existing septic
system in lieu of tying into the City's sewer at this time. Staff recommended that
P & Z Minutes
November 11, 1999
26
Draft Copy
the applicant be tied into the city sewer with this development just like all other
new developments.
The total building coverage is proposed to be 10, 943 square feet, which is 4% of
the lot. The total proposed landscaped area is 207,481 square feet, which is 83
per cent of the lot. The applicant is required to provide 70 off-street parking
spaces for the ultimate development. He will develop the off-street parking lot
per phase of development.
Staff recommended the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the request to
rezone tracts 2A3, 2AB3, and 2A3C 1, W. C. Newton Survey Abstract 1182,
addressed as 7591 and 7601-Precinct Line Road fròm AG-Agricultural to PD-
Planned Development for a Wedding Chapel and other associated accessory
wedding chapel uses because the property is designated as low density
residential on the Future Land Use Plan and the uses proposed, including retail
sales, consulting and catering services, are more intensive when combined on
one property.
Chairman Bowen opened the public hearing.
Mr. Edward Lett presented his case, explaining that the only front fencing would
consist of PVC material in a picket style and will only be 4' in height.
Trenda Trett of Virtu Design Studio, representing the applicant also spoke in
favor of this request.
There were no opponents and the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Tolbert, seconded by Mr. Lueck, moved to approve PZ 99-44 to rezone the
property from Agricultural to Planned Development for wedding chapel and other
associated accessory wedding chapel uses subject to the following conditions:
· The development is tied to the site plan.
· The ordinance include the proposed regulations submitted by the applicant
with the exception that wooden decorative fencing not be allowed.
· Include a notation on the site plan that all the pavilions and gazebos will be
built in accordance with the Little Bear Creek Flood Plain Control Ordinance
No. 2091.
· The future land use plan be amended to reflect the subject property as
commercial
· The site plan be amended to show either a living screen or a masonry
screening wall along the northern property line outside of the Little Bear
Creek Corridor.
· Recommend City Council waives the zoning case fees the applicant has
already paid.
P & Z Minutes
November 11, 1999
27
Amendment to Primary District Regulations - North Richland Hills
Little White Wedding Chapel Planned Development Project at 7591, 7601 and 7605
Precinct Line Road (PZ 99-44)
A. Purpose:
Wedding. Special Occasion and Bridal Boutique Facilities: Intended to provide
areas for development of wedding chapels, reception areas and bridal/tuxedo shop.
B. Permitted Uses:
Both indoor and outdoor wedaing ceremonies and receptions, retail sales and rental
of wedding/formal apparel, wedding consulting/counseling, floral arrangements, catering
services, special occasion events, group/professional meetings, travel arrangements,
and photography services.
C. Permitted Structures and Amenities:
Wedding chapels and facilities, reception areas (both attached and detached),
bridal/formal/tux boutique, gazebos, pavilions, gardens, fountains, nature paths,
parking, and other structures related to wedding activities, wedding retail and special
occasions.
D. Lot and Area Requirements:
DescriDtion Sizes
Minimum Lot Area 4.5 acres (196,020 sq. ft.)
Minimum Lot Width 585 ft.
Minimum Lot Depth 322 ft.
Minimum Enclosed Unit Size 100 SQ. ft.
Minimum Outdoor Unit Size (gazebo) 64 SQ. ft.
Minimum Front Building Line 20 ft.
Minimum Side Buildina Line 5 ft.
Minimum Rear Building Line 10 ft.
Maximum Height of Roof Structure 45 ft.
(including steeple)
E. General Conditions:
1. Privacy Fencing:
a. If a building structure is less than 5 feet from an adjoining property line, and
the adjoining property is not shared by common ownership, privacy screening
will be constructed. The screening must be 6 feet tall or have the potential of
being 6 feet tall, and can be in the form of a live growth, cross fencing,
stockade fence, masonry, or a combination thereof.
b. If a building structure is 5 feet or greater from the nearest adjoining property
line, no fencing or screening will be required.
c. Due to the heavily wooded area to the south and west of the subject property,
which will act as a buffer zone, no screening or fencing will be required along
those property lines.
d. Decorative fencing will be allowed along the front of the property within the
landscape setback and will be no higher than 5 feet. Composition of fence
can be wood, masonry, man made material or a combination thereof.
2. Parking: Required parking for complex to be based solely on pew seating count
at 18" per person. - -
3. Drive entry separation: Drive separation to be 300 feet due to existing Little Bear
Creek and culvert.
4. Landscape Credits: Landscape credits for the trees along Little Beak Creek to
be applied toward PO 99-44.
5. Masonry Requirements: Maximum masonry requirement for Little White
Wedding Chapel not to exceed 10% of each building elevation.
6. Food Service: If food is prepared on site under control of occupants, kitchen
design, appliances and food preparation will meet city ordnance. Outside
catering will be permitted without restriction.
7. Accessory buildings: Gazebos, pavilions, arches, etc. are permitted.
NRH
APPLICATION FOR A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
City of North Richland Hills
7301 NE Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas
817 -581-5500
(Plgas. ;:nn! or type all responses)
')ART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
"ame of applicant / agent:
r;nA(l~ '3A,J~ Léíf ,4/'o1l
111 6Þ /4JA t..!> t.é-\"\
Street address of applicant / agent:
5""š~
Q.A~~c..~,^f L,.;.
City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent:
,£.1 '" ~r\ T~ 7' ~ ~7
PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name of property owner.
Telephone number of applicant / agent:
& 11 - Z '-8· -rrr.:r
~,.. \"f"oé þ.~ A a~~
Street address of property owner.
([,0
City / State / Zip Code of property owner.
Telephone number of property owner.
Note: Attach letter or affidavit from property owner if different from applicant / agent:
PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Current ZOning classification:
Legal Description or Attach Metes & Bounds:
~õ C f\f'.......~ )a.~-.~.-;I') þ..~,..<....,..~~
Descnbe the nature of the proposed activity and any particular characteristics related to the use of the property: .
" ~o\J. ~cæ It(l(p.~ ,...... ';'J)j),,.I~.s ':""fT'~.u ~T"/" w 4où,),,,, " .~f.
~ ~2>D "."'- c: t-\ Þ fG'Ls, i~~< E-t1" ~ ~ S', W ~ IIi) I '" <'. ¡' He. P, G' A ~~iJ"~r. P A" 1<'" ~,.) J'. ~\....~ 'T p) ~ ""...
6".A1.."tf:ÞlS' "'~C:1'I~c;. ~"'('f'\J /J/l.f::.s.r,·...~ ~()_J'
, ,
Site plan attached which conforms with the requirements included in this packet:
""7 Yes
¡ I No
Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner.
I ¡ Yes
I No
1-J / IJ
I hereby certify that I am, or represent. the legal owner of the property descnbed above and do hereby submit this request for approval
of a Planned Development District to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration.
Date. II/t~/f' í
Sig""J¿ Q~
Pnnl Name /11, é i:> '^" A Q,1) ~.,..,
PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date of Plannmg & Zoning Commission Public Hearing:
Taxes Paid?
CYes
Liens Paid?
I : Yes
Assessments Paid?
eYes
No
Fee:
Date of City Council Public Hearing:
No
$300.00
Planned Development Approved:
! Yes C No
CondItions of Approval:
¡
-
No
This application will not be
scheduled for public hearing
until the application fee is
received.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
CD - 415 (5/97)
To: The Planning and Zoning Board and City Council of North Richland Hills
From: Mr. and Mrs. Edward Lett, 609 Precinct Line Road, NRH, TX 76180
Objective: Request to re-zone under a Planned Development the property located at 7591, 7601
and 7605 Precinct Line Road, NRH 76180 to accommodate a wedding facility and gardens.
Overview: On May 13, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Board ofNRH agreed unanimously that a
Planned Development (PD) would be more appropriate than a C-1 re-zoning for the properties
located at 7591, 7601 and 7605 Precinct Line Road (approximately 5.75 acres). Since May 13,
the property owners, Edward and Mary Jane Lett, have worked diligently with architects,
surveyors, and engineers to meet and fulfill all the PD application requirements for NRH. The
long-range PD goal will extend over a growth period of several years (approximately 3-10 years)
depending on the cash flow and if there is a need to further expand the facility. The completed
project will include at least two small chapels with pews, gardens, gazebos, pavilions,
greenhouses, reception areas, meeting/office rooms, landscaped gardens with arbors, nature
walks, a parking lot and a bridal/tux boutique. The boutique will be discreetly placed on the
grounds so that its façade and operations will not interfere with wedding ceremonies and
receptions.
Phase I:
The initial plan is to re-plat the three tracts (7591, 7601, 7605) into a single tract of approximately
5.75 acres. The tract currently designated as 7591 Precinct Line Road (approximately 4.21 acres)
and the Little Bear Creek Beltway will be used as a natural, wooded buffer zone providing greater
privacy for wedding couples and their guests. The 7601 tract (.9 acres) has a brick house setting
in the center of the lot. It will be remodeled for small parlor weddings, receptions with kitchen
facilities and the bridal boutique. The 7605 tract (.7 acres) has a large workshop, which will be
removed and replaced with a small wedding chapel with an adjoining reception area. The parking
lot will cover the remaining area in tront of the small chapel to Precinct Line Road and in tront of
the existing house. It will also serve as a traffic noise buffer trom Precinct Line Road. Behind
and to the south of the house at 7601, gazebos, pavilions, fountains and gardens will be
developed.
Phase II:
If the first phase is successful, then construction will continue. Another wedding chapel and
reception area will be built on the east side of the existing house at 7601 Precinct Line Road.
Business Activity:
Considering the various sizes and locations of the ceremony/reception accommodations, more
than one wedding could be conducted at the same time. Due to parking restrictions and time
allotments for each group, a maximum of 210 guests can be accommodated at one time. Most
weddings would be scheduled in the afternoons and evenings, with Friday, Saturday and Sunday
being the most popular.
The bridal boutique will initially be opened on weekends only. Eventually, the shop maybe
opened longer business hours, sucb as 12am to 7pm, Monday through Saturday. Special
appointments may also be necessary.
Greenbelt Area:
Part of the 7591 tract (4.21 acres) has the Little Bear Creek greenbelt running through it. The
natural woodlands and rural beauty is a wonderful background for scenic wedding ceremonies and
a great backdrop for photographers. However, there is a need to clean the area of trash or items
not normally found in forest areas. The owners, Mr. and Mrs. Lett, will consult with the NRH
Parks and Recreation Department to learn and plan long-range goals for the area.
Management:
Edward and Jane Lett, the current owners, will operate The Little White Wedding Chapel
property. They have resided in the mid-cities area for over 30 years. During this time they have
owned two retail businesses and Jane has worked in a family bridal business (full and part-time)
since she was 16 years old. Jane is an experienced wedding consultant, who has worked with
Eddie to direct and set-up entire wedding ceremonies and receptions. They realize the value of a
well designed, attractive establishment that will provide the community with quality wedding
services, which are in high demand.
Dr. Mary Jane Lett
M. Edward Lett
7.
PZ 99-12
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF EDWARD LETT FOR A
ZONING CHANGE ON TRACTS 1 & 2 OF THE W.C. NEWTON SURVEY, A-
1182 FROM AG-AGRICULTURAL TO C1-COMMERCIAL. (LOCATED AT
7601 & 7605 PRECINCT LINE ROAD)
TABLED
Ms. Ratcliff gave an overview of the case, explaining that this is two-tracts of
property totaling 1.56 acres of land on Precinct Line Road, which is currently
zoned AG-Agricultural. The property is currently developed with a single family
structure and a one story frame building. The Lett's have stated that they are
proposing to use the existing single family home for a wedding chapel and will be
adding on to the front of the building. Future additions are proposed as well.
Should the zoning change be approved, all permitted uses in the C1-Commercial
classification would be allowed. If approved, site plan approval will be required
because the property is within 200' of residentially zoned property.
She explained the applicant is aware of the landscape and sign regulations. She
showed a map of the existing property and the existing development. She also
showed the property on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, which is designated
as low density residential for single family development, stating this request is
not in compliance with this plan and staff recommends denying this request for
that reason.
There was discussion of what is existing and what is proposed on the east side
of Precinct Line Road.
Mary Jane Lett, applicant presented this case, explaining that she and her family
have successfully run several businesses in Hurst for 30 years. She made a
formal presentation, stating the tract north of tract 1 will be their future residence.
Tract 1 is vacant except for a red barn, and tract 2 has a red brick house that
may be used as a parsonage. South of this property is all agricultural property,
but only a small part of it is developable, explaining that it lies within the flood
plain. They plan on utilizing this property by cleaning it up and using it as a
buffer - to insure privacy for the chapel. Mrs. Lett showed pictures and a map
she had compiled showing a combination of the three adjoining cities Master
Plans for the area.
The name of the chapel is already registered as "The Little White Chapel" and
showed pictures of the proposed facility, stating that it will be visually stunning,
with a soft, romantic atmosphere; they anticipate an average wedding size of 75
- 150 people.
Page 5 5/13/99
P & Z Minutes
Ms. Lett stated they would be purchasing the property north of the request for
their residence. Additionally, they will purchase the property south of the
request, which is in the flood plain. They proposed to clean it up and use it as a
buffer and scenic area for weddings and pictures.
Chairman Davis called for additional proponents. Seeing none he called for
opponents.
Ms. Janet Sidmyer, 6725 Rolling Hills Drive spoke against this request. She
stated that while a wedding chapel would be a compatible use and she would
consider it a good neighbor, she doesn't want the property rezoned for fear the
wedding chapel wouldn't go through and a Taco Bell would. She doesn't want
the commercial precedent set in this area. She believes the people in Woodland
Oaks purchased their homes with the security of the Master Plan for the City
showing this area as low density residential and believes it would be unfair to
change that plan now.
Responding to a question, Ms. Sidmyer stated that she is not opposed to a
wedding chapel, she is opposed to the C1-Commercial classification.
Charles Denton, 7609 Precinct Line Road, stated he believes the Lett's proposal
has been well thought out and they are planning to invest a lot of money into the
property. He asked the Commission to strongly consider this request.
Mr. Vern Jackson, 9125 Rumfield Road, stated that a chapel would enhance any
neighborhood and believes the Lett's intentions are true, providing it stayed that
way. However, he has concerns similar to Ms. Sidmyer for the commercial
precedent being set.
He explained that several years ago he built a brand new home on Rufe Snow,
which was surrounded by 3 cow pastures. Needless to say, 4 years later,
commercial development had run him out of his home. He bought the current
property because it allowed him to get back to the kind of neighborhood he
wanted to raise his children in - strictly country. He stated that he has already
lost a 3 1/2-acre bath pond that was rezoned to C 1-Commercial.
Seeing no additional opponents, the public hearing was closed.
The general consensus of the Commissioners was they liked the wedding
chapel, but didn't like setting the precedent of commercial zoning. They agreed
that may be the way it ends up going, but would prefer to see the Master Plan
amended accordingly before they set a precedent for that area.
Chairman Davis stated that no one is opposed to the chapel. He likes the
natural barriers she proposes and would like to find a way to allow her to do what
Page 6 5/13/99
p & Z Minutes
she wants while limiting what else could be put there. He asked, if at the
concurrence of the applicant, could all the C 1 uses be deleted except wedding
chapels.
Ms. Ratcliff stated that excluding uses is a nightmare for enforcement staff and
also feels there may be legal problems with it. She believes a planned
development for the area would be more appropriate, however, renotification
would be required because the amount of acreage would be different.
Chairman Davis asked if they were too include all the property they planned to
purchase but not rezone, would they have four acres. He suggested looking at a
Planned Development if they did.
Responding to a question, Ms. Ratcliff stated she would recommend the
Commission deny this request without prejudice, and allow the applicant to
reapply for a PO with the new acreage.
Chairman Davis stated he would like staff to waive fees for the Lett's resubmittal.
Ms. Ratcliff stated that additional newspaper notification would be required, as
would additional property owner notifications. She did not agree with waiving the
fee.
Mr. Bowen asked if the Lett's agreed with the idea of a planned development.
The Lett's stated they would need several days to rethink it.
Mr. Laubacher, seconded by Mr. Nehring moved to table PZ 99-12 for two
weeks, allowing the applicant time to consider other options. This case will be
continued at the May 27, 1999 meeting and the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Bowen believes a Planned Development would be workable and everyone
would benefit. He strongly urged the applicant to pursue it.
Page 7 5/13/99
P & Z Minutes
6.
PZ 99-12
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF EDWARD LETT FOR
A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACTS 1 & 2 OF THE W.C. NEWTON SURVEY, A-
1182 FROM AG-AGRICUL TURAL TO C1-COMMERCIAL. (LOCATED AT
7601 AND 7605 PRECICNT LINE ROAD) TABLED 5/13/99
WITHDRAWN
Edward Lett, applicant stated they are withdrawing the request for zoning
change and will follow up with a different submittal at a later date.
Mr. Nehring, seconded by Mr. Blue, moved to accept the applicant request
to withdraw PZ 99-12, allowing them to resubmit the request as a Planned
Development. The motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Lueck stated he would like to recommend the fees be waived by staff for the
resubmittal of this request.
Ms. Ratcliff stated that the Commission did not have the authority to waive these
fees, stating on the City Council has that ability.
Mr. Lueck understood and stated he would like the recommendation included in
the motion.
Mr. Nehring amended his motion to include the recommendation that fee's
are waived for the resubmittal of this case. Mr. Blue seconded this
amendment and it carried unanimously.
Page 4 5/27/99
P & Z Minutes
ORDINANCE NO. 2448
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, AS AMENDED, TO ESTABLISH A PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed a rezoning
request on a tract of land identified in Case Number PZ 99-44; and
WHEREAS, the developer has indicated an interest In establishing the proposed
development as a planned development district under the guidelines of the North
Richland Hills Zoning Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that the
development conditions of this tract of land do not provide adequate opportunities
for development under available existing zoning district regulations; and
WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of North Richland Hills has forwarded a recommendation
to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874, as amended, by
establishing a Planned Development District and by changing said Zoning
Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, in Case Number PZ 99-44, on tracts 2A3, 2AB3, and 2A3C1 out of the
W.C Newton Survey, Abstract 1182 and proposed to be platted as Lot 1, Block 1,
The Little White Wedding Chapel, addressed as 7591 and 7601 Precinct Line
Road the following described property, attached as Exhibit "A", shall be rezoned
from "AG" -Agricultural to establish a Planned Development District with specific
development regulations as herein described:
2.
THAT, the purpose of this Planned Development District is to provide for wedding,
special occasion and bridal boutique facilities. The permitted uses and
development regulations for this planned development district shall be as follows:
1. Permitted Uses: Both indoor and outdoor wedding ceremonies and
receptions, retail sales and rental of or wedding/formal apparel, wedding
Ordinance No. 2448
Page 1 of 4
consulting/counseling, floral arrangements, catering services, special occasion
events, group/professional meetings, travel arrangements, and photography
services constructed in accordance with the site plan, landscape plan and
building elevations attached as Exhibit NO.2.
3.
That, the following lot and area regulations shall govern the development of the
Planned Development District development on said property, as follows:
Descri tion
Minimum Lot Area
Minimum Lot Width
Minimum Lot De th
Minimum Enclosed Unit Size
Minimum Outdoor Unit Size
Minimum Front Buildin Line
Minimum Side Buildin Line
Minimum Rear Buildin Line
Maximum Height of Roof Structure
includin stee Ie
45 feet
4.
That, all provisions of Ordinance No. 1874, the Zoning Regulations of the City of
North Richland Hills, as amended, which are not in conflict with the terms of this
Planned Development shall remain applicable on said property, and the following
general conditions shall apply to this property to guide development:
1. Privacy Fencing:
a. A wooden or masonry screening fence shall be required along the
northern property line with the exception of the area located within the
Little Bear Creek Flood Plain.
b. Due to the heavily wooded area to the south and west of the subject
property, which will act as a buffer zone, no screening or fencing will be
required along those property lines.
c. Decorative fencing will be allowed along the front of the property within the
landscape setback and will be no higher than 5 feet. Composition of fence
can be masonry, man made material or a combination thereof.
2. Parking: Required parking for complex to be based solely on pew seating
count at 18 inches per person.
3. Drive entry separation: Drive separation to be less than 300 feet, as shown on
the site plan, due to the existing little Bear Creek and culvert.
Ordinance No. 2448
Page 2 of 4
4. Landscape Credits: Landscape credits for the tress along Little Bear Creek to
be applied toward PO 99-44.
5. Masonry Requirements: Maximum masonry requirement for the Little White
Wedding Chapel not to exceed 10% of each building elevation.
6. Food Service: If food is prepared on site under control of occupants, kitchen
design, appliances and food preparation will meet city ordinances. Outside
catering will be permitted in compliance with city ordinances.
7. Accessory Buildings: Gazebos, pavilions, arches etc. are permitted.
8. Hours of Operations Limitations:
a. No Outdoor Operations between 11 :00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
b. Indoor Operations are not limited.
9. All the structures, pavilions and gazebos will be built in accordance with the
Little Bear Creek Flood Plain Control Ordinance No. 2091.
5.
That, the Zoning Map of the City of North Richland Hills be amended to reflect this
planned development district.
6.
That, the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan be amended to
change the land use from low density residential to commercial.
7.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the
City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this
ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or
section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid
judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses,
sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have
been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any
such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
8.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in
full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance.
Ordinance No. 2448
Page 3 of4
9.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its
passage.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9TH DAY
OF DECEMBER, 1999.
~tl~
C airman, Planmng and Zomng Commission
Secretary, Planning and Z
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 10th DAY OF
JANUARY, 2000.
Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
Ordinance No. 2448
Page 4 of4
.-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning & Inspections Department
Council Meeting Date: 01/10/00
Subject: Request of Bill J. Fenimore for an Amended Final Plat of Agenda Number: PS 99-36
Blocks 5,6,7, Woodland Oaks Addition. The property is located at the southeast corner
of Amundson Drive and Crane Road.
Case Summary
Mr. Fenimore has submitted an amended plat of Woodland Oaks Addition due to an error
discovered on Lot 8, Block 6. The original final plat did not include a 30 foot ingress and
egress easement within Lot 8. This easement serves as the ingress and egress for Mr. J.
A. McDaniel to Crane Road. Mr. McDaniel's property is noted as Tracts 30-1 and Tract
3J, out of the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1055. The amendments to the plat include
the following:
· The amended plat correctly reflects the 30 foot ingress and egress easement within Lot
8, Block 6, which creates development challenges for Lot 8.
~ The applicant has noted that no variances will be necessary to construct a house on
the lot.
~ The minimum side yard setback on the south side of the property is 6 feet. The
width of the buildable area is reduced to approximately 33.95 feet.
"--
· Additionally, the Fire Department has requested Lonesome Oaks Court to be renamed,
because there is another street named Lonesome Oak Drive. The applicant has
proposed Brazos Bend Drive to be the new street name, which poses no conflict.
· TXU in the attached letter stated once alternative facilities are in place they plan to
abandon the ten-foot electrical easement extending from the rear of Lot 8, Block 6 to
the rear of Lot 15, Block 5 across Joe Gray's property, the cul-de-sac of Brazos Bend
Drive and Lots 16 and 17, Block 5. The applicant has been working with TXU to see
about other alternatives for electrical service.
Recommendation:
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on December 9,1999,
recommended approval of PS 99-36, Amended Plat of Blocks 5,6,7, Woodland Oaks
Addition by a vote of 7 to 0 with a condition. The condition being that the plat not be filed
until the ten-foot electrical easement is abandoned.
To approve PS 99-36 with the condition as recommended by the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
~ ~r
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Finance Director
~~~~
City Mana~Signature
L:\Cases\PS Cases\PS 99-36-41 Woodland Oaks Amend Plat.doc
Page 1 of 1
~I"'''''''''''''''~~' ", ",'~!"", "~·,'··...~'(;.,l~"L H'\lEAH ~IR N',.t...~,'QJ¡,, ':/ .,'!'....,.".~,' ..''; .
~~ ~ ~~l~~j \ 1 ~
: .;ï~ -7 ~1f~:f~1 ' ,\ ,R.¡22 \
Ii I ,-- :z:. CT ,0 0
2 ;:ilo ~ ~n\)~ 1 ~ ~ 0 .. It , ~ 7.,../
"'W¡¡"'GI'~þ(IIÞII 1l~:)'--1 on. c;. ~ ~I~-l
f7 ~:t: .~r;. f7LIIJ'
=fl ~.,. II i 12 ( \ .. HIALEAH ~IR S
- ~ · n. · 7 \. 5 \ '1:. 2 \ '..l Q.~' .-1
~/~2O \~ k ~' i"1 ~k \}~ /~.-i':\..
J ~. ~\. .12 U.. .~0(211 C~~5 ~ rg',
'< '¥. ~ ~ '21 " J,.~ ø.:"
2 ..VI (J 1 11 ~ 11 .; _2' I fi" 2 ~ /" ~ I ~
1-. ... ~ 5 0 ~~r¡:.~~i'" 0
- I · ;Þ-U·I. 9 gÞ-U·~ 17..it; ~ :II r1 ~ ,;."!: 0 /i.~ R.3 /~/ /" ., Q&:
I---:r JI ... JL_ ~'t>.., ,:¡' 0 ,~'ð ',~52 ,< / 7 115,9
ASHCRAFT D_.~ S oViE ,~'" R. <:J~ .. /, \ W
- · 2 J . , . \' ~ '11 1 2 ) I, / . "', , 7 ~~ ~~17 /' /;/.\ ¿:. ~
:2 III I 5. . , . ~ "'1' ~,~Ú. \. ....I
-.. 20 . . f7 '6 11 .. 0 1/ n 5'''' /~ ) 6 7 /. .. ~~ ~~\ ~c ~~. z I I' l-
I h· "'-" . (.~ Q...-\ \' ,11 « , ) 2 1'~
-' MARTI IN - - ~ I f/ 2 "'-, ' ~"'.~~.;\~.:¿;:. Ã~~~, )~;..~ ~ I ~
1 2 I) I· , \, 1741. I, 111 I. II/ I 0 / , ,«f.~ ~n;¡",I)~--~o ~~\~~~~ ~<:: '\.1' 'ß7 U
~I I' ~I" ~~\"\'-" -(" #, \\ ~ C \¡_~~~I_ LU
\ I I [0 ~:;"¡'7\:'~'?;' /<~\:.~\/ ~ .>~ ~ ~\~~;_":'-'~f-~ ~
- · 2 ) , , · 7 · '-,,~ · 1/ Q , J ~ \,.\ :¡.' ~~' 21\~ ./ \ ' "'...' ..À. ) I 0 Q. \. \, ~
f\U \2\\~\ ~\1I1 , . / - e ':~./ R~~- ~-L tUM \ . \
JASON C~I::';:", R·2 ..' \,/ U\III ... /,o" /0 \ "-. _~ ~., 13 z . I
I 1 ~S'\ þ.f \~ _ 'f 9 / '" ¡" In ~ý 11 /Y TI / ,_ .--: \ n'" ~ ' ~« -;- ~ \ II \
» J4 \ JJ J2 ), )Q DR _ 0 \ ",II \'(
..~ PS99-36 .inl"; - V' ~.
_ ~ ~ AME~~~~r.¡~6 ~~~;~~~~T~Ò~ & 7, i~<i~'_~I_ : ,\
- ~: I¡~~~" \~?I~,X.~\--,-~~~" -êgj' :¡:::: (5"* ~~ ----~~~
«~~~ ~ I~;\ 2L ~ 2 . ~ 2 · 2 3D ~ ,~~.._ I. EVEIIG,R-f;(N't:~~ \\
...øo4 -' I~!f¡ J 2 ~ 1 7 Q 1 TI I f1 I ~ I ~~I6 I I' a ~pt ¡ . ¡ .
~ _I _2 -~, .,.,. "-4 ::::::;:;:;:;:;:;:. ::;:;:::~ :::::::: "~Na8Lsre-t i t I. ''\p«''tJ I I z I a I, ! · : · 1..
- .-. .,....,.......:.: .:.:.:.: .:.:.:': ...... I"i !' ~ ¡i ~ ~ ¡
1 1469 ... ;:;:::::::::;:;:::: :::::::: ::::;:;: ;:;::: d' ~\\..\.. I 7 HICHLAND PAlIK
2 ~ - \21;: · ¡¡¡¡$¡~¡¡¡¡¡~ ~~~.~~~~.~ ~.~~,;;.;i.¡ ¡.1.;~.¡ : ~ ,: H-,~~~-= · I .. I to I .. i .. ¡ "(
111. 'G'~\.i 1 ~ ~ 1U C ............:.:.:.: "'.:IIi: .:.:.:.: .:.:.: 12"1 7ØZ-~ 1 ~I"" I, I' a I, I. . : .
.j;> - .... ...... ..:...... ........ '..... I) I .
.... D ;:;~:::::;:: [~.:::::::::::.;,~ 34J _ AG Ii I C Ii LAN D¡_CY; T
~ ~\ - - ~I<~'.. ¡¡;~:¡: ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡[till¡!!: - ~ - ': VJ~~~
.. - - .:~;c. :::~:::;¡:¡·¡~~:¡.;¡¡m~¡ Acr- ~ .-í/
..~~1 .:.:....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: 2089 II.... . " ~ .
('I D .1, :::::;:::';:;:;:;:;;;;;; rh73 11I.JE ...-1AaAI.......
~ AG 2 _,!I 2 "':'::;;;:::;;;:;;:;:::: ::0-1 ~,,,,, ~ ;~:~ ..
-4 1ItZr 11I.2G ....-- ......... ...... ~ft. O:\ \\' I ._ I:::': "
~.\" -...... _ ¡w---1 "
~ . .,..:::::.::: " ..,' ':::::. 'IIUJ1 1 JIIW # .lI!.L I 7 .. u . 3D "
, .. .... --;--~ ~,-',
~ ... 1 O~_..
III 11UI . .... ...'..... r1 ji~-: 'T o,t· ,
~ JIll '.: .:.:.' I/.~ I :I." )~~~ ,...-_
-. AG - ~ .:.,' 2Z ;-::~-. 3 I ïI~~t . 11I.)Q ~ 1~1 ~. ~~
R-1 1IU) - wl_2). u" "'~&
- TUO 21) '~I!:II I) '~"9T~. ~ ::: I In.., , :II
- / /'0, '0 ... ..
2 . \ \:t6......-::: 1 . R i ,_.....!....- . '"
AG - ~ V_-<õí~þ. I · 7 · r ,i011~ J: ! J ~ ~
aasP 5 · /1/0,..._ ~ ~I -:: J '/ ·
- ~ ~ · 1 1/ -' ~/-iJ~ þt. ! ;(f~, l ~ i-: -š ' · ~"""'" '
I '0 '# u I~ .11?~:" I" ":," IO!\'~f'M~" ~. .., " " " __
"Ì"~~U., . ,c1.-, . " ~
'''''''~'~~ u.
..'. '...
.' ...
, ...
¡ ¡
~
Ill,.
AG
1
\
1111
-
\
~wl
·î~
L~~l -
- JOI' ~. I
1(; ~'--
_2 I 'J
a
111. 11'
~~i~1
'-1·1 ....-
1577
I ,,"
r R-'so~
,CO~ rTR&>!
AG
HREE E RANCH
1 42076 R.2
'1172
~ "~~"~~""\
~.. :
=
Ü
~
u
¡
0-
j
~
..
o
z
I~
~ ~h
.
;.-. - mKT. ~o~'i ~
~))\.-¿~
¥. Þ. ,'fCØ) _
.
-
..
.---
!1IACf .
.....ê
.
^~¥'S ,
J'"' 1,\çf:Þ ..
I
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills. TX 76180
817·581 ·5515
Application Type:
Ii Preliminary Plat
.---1
Application for Subdivision Plat Approval
NI~H
(Please pml aU responses)
i I Final Plat
o Replat
o Short Form
I YIAmended Plat
Property Owner Information:
Name of Property Owner:
c::.. R.A rJ~ ~ b, 0 0 ¡;; l ;'4) Þ,^ 1! u"T t.. .,.. ~
,
47,7 c,.fl,ç:~J.,j.A'1 ~'T
Phone No.
Address of Property Owner:
City:
~ oa, µ !-\c.\.h...oV'1) ~ I\.,l.\
State: 1)c-
Zip: 7t.,þ
Proposed Subdivision Name:
W~(>L.~'b vAIL.\
ßv" S
ç' l>~
I
Î
No. of Acres in Plat:
No. of Lots in Plat:
Il4J:J
17
Authorized Agent Information:
"Note: An affidavit signed by the property owner is required when the agent is not the property owner"
Name of Authorized Agent:
"ßLL.l. l. 'P~(~~~
Address: 41t 7 ~,v ~¡Jy CT.
City: ,JI.)~ R ,~L.' ~ ¡...{ ,(..l. ,
Phone No.
t-/7- 1.J 1- 41jd
State: I
V.
Zip: 7 ~J /ù
Surveyor / Engineer Information:
Name of Firm: S"~Õ' 2-,0 6ë ., ~u r.
Phone No. rP17-4'Zr/ -7 rl 3
Address:
t>¿~ S'HEAk., LA.
City:
N2-t-!
State:
I~
Zip: 7" fz;
Contact Person:
9)~ "V$f &;.r..., ~I OH
Plat Fee Calculation:
All Preliminary Plats
a. Application Fee:
b. $1.50 perresidentiallot
or $5.00 per commercial acre:
Total Fee:
$120.00
All Replats, Short Form Plats, and Final Plats
a. Application Fee: $120.00
b. $1.50 per residential lot
or $5.00 per commercial acre:
c. $65.00 for each street intersection:
d. County plat filing fee: $58.00·
Total Fee:
All Amended Plats
a. Application Fee:
b. County plat filing fee:
Total Fee:
(none)
$58.00 .
$58.00
. Additional filing fees may be applicable
for oversize or extra documents.
Time Waiver Request: (optional)
The applicant is aware that action on this plat may not take place for more than thirty (30) days and waives all time requirements for approval of the plat.
Signature:
I certity that I am, or represent. the owner of the property described above and hereby submit this subdivision plat to the City of North Richland Hills for consideration.
Date: J l> '" 1..11- tt "
Subdivision Plat Application
Signature:
Your name (Printed Name): ~ ILL. \. 1= ~ Þ"I m )Il ~
4
CC-418(1-98)
Dec-03-99 12:07pm Frcm-
+
T-365 P.02/02 F-995
~-=·1UELECTRIC· ð
~ ~ lone Star Gas"
Tti.c:a.. Ut~litie.. Co",p~n'.~
~C¡) (),
~D
3
~99
December 3, 1999
Ms. Marcy Ratcliff
1301 NE Loop 820
North Ricbland Hills, Texas 76180
RE: Woodland Oaks AdditioD
Ms. Ratcliff:
TIeU electric currently has facilities in the 10' easement that extends across Lot 8, Block 6 and Lots 15,
16 & 17, Block 5. Once we have moved our facilities into the new easet"u'!nts to be provided by the
developer, we plan to abandon the existing easements.
Please let me know ifmore information is required.
200 N. Ector Dr. Euless, Texas 76039
Draft Copy
9.
PS 99-36
CONSIDER REQUEST OF BILL FENIMORE FOR AN AMENDED PLAT OF
BLOCKS 5, 6 & 7, WOODLAND OAKS ADDITION. THE PROPERTY IS
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AMUNDSON DRIVE AND
CRANE ROAD.
APPROVED
Ms. Ratcliff explained that Mr. Fenimore has submitted an amended plat of
Woodland Oaks Addition due to an error discovered on Lot 8, Block 6. The
original final plat did not include a 30-foot ingress and egress easement within
Lot 8. This easement serves as the ingress and egress for Mr. J. A. McDaniel to
Crane Road. Mr. McDaniel's property is noted as Tracts 30-1 and Tract 3J, out
of the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1055. The amended plat correctly
reflects the ingress and egress easement. Mr. McDaniel wanted the plat to
correctly reflect the access to his property. This ingress and egress easement
makes Lot 8 a challenge to develop. The applicant has noted that no variances
will be necessary to construct a house on the lot. The minimum side yard
setback on the south side of the property is 6 feet. The width of the buildable
area is reduced to approximately 33.95 feet.
Additionally, the Fire Department has requested Lonesome Oaks Court to be
renamed, because there is another street named Lonesome Oak Drive that is too
similar. Changing the name will reduce potential confusion in an emergency.
The applicant has proposed Brazos Bend Drive, which does not conflict with any
street names.
TXU had noted after the final plat was approved they would not abandon the
electrical easement extending from the rear of Lot 15, Block 5 across Joe Gray's
property, the cul-de-sac right-of-way and Lots 16 and 17, Block 5. The applicant
has been working with TXU to see about other alternatives for electrical service.
TXU has submitted a letter stating once alternative facilities are in place they
plan to abandon the easements.
Staff recommends approval of the amended plat of Blocks 5, 6, and 7, Woodland
Oaks Addition; PS99-36 with the condition that the amended plat not be filed until
10-foot electrical easement is abandoned.
Mr. Tolbert, seconded by Mr. Lueck, moved to approve PS 99-36, provided
the amended plat is not filed until the 10' electrical easement is abandoned.
The motion carried unanimously.
P & Z Minutes
November 11. 1999
9
~"..-"""
.~
)..~
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Plannina & Inspections Department
Council Meeting Date: 01/10/00
Subject: Consider Reauest of Mr. Marvin Smith. aaent for Agenda Number: PS 99-38
Mr. Charles Pennington, for a Final Plat of Lots 1 - 4, Block 1, Pennington Estates. This
Property is Located at the southeast intersection of Douglas Lane and Bursey Road.
Case Summary:
Mr. Marvin Smith has submitted a Final Plat of Pennington Estates. The proposed Final
Plat is for 1.842 acres zoned R-1 Residential. The applicant is proposing to plat the
property into four lots of approximately 20,000 square feet each.
Article 10 of the Subdivision Regulations requires that a masonry screening wall be
constructed adjacent to Bursey Road (C4U residential thoroughfare). The applicant is
requesting a waiver from this requirement. Because the parcels front on Bursey Road, the
masonry wall would be located in the front yard where it is not permitted by the Zoning
Ordinance.
Recommendation:
The Planning & Zoning Commission, at the December 9, 1999 meeting, recommended 7-0
to approve as submitted including a waiver to the required masonry screening wall on
Bursey Road.
To approve PS 99-38, Final Plat of Pennington Estates Addition as recommended by
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Othe
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds AvallaCle
~
Finance Director
/ê! C-~
City Manager Signature
K:\Cases\PS Cases\PS 99-38-41 Final Pennington.dot
Page 1 of 2
PZ 99 - 38
FINAL PLAT
LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 1, PENNINGTON
ESTATES
'f_~I""','_
-::::a _. '
fi-U
,l 'Il 'I:
I I ,
-¡:'-~-
',';¡ ·'t'. ! ~~ i '" :,... ' Ie
.~ _: ~:'r, I~_' ~~_~ ~
.~ ,J 14 'j,~ II" I' I :11
. I . ~ I ] I 2
(~( . 1-'
I: I'" -":1':' I"
·.~llf
,- ¡ 7 ~-
.., "-'!1 ~:... ... ¡'#I, '.~
',ei.
'n 1:,1 : '.. \'1 I ..~ I'" '.II
I
~ ;:) :;~ , I~ I (4 I It
---.,/1. . : -I
, II, I ~ I I 1::
'IKWQOO
'!"t. '11 n I 1::1
- -;H.;-- -:-- .
:::' _1 i 7.j ~1-....:."1'
,"IjWOOD
: ¡ .~~~~~~ '~.~ ':. .
2E!
'I' 1:0:
sTARN£S ffO
:,,1' 1:1'1: ill
-,- ·1"1- ,-;- .
~ . ¡ ,! .
GlffNnALE
_ :." ~' ~~d~~L·~~'~:K~:Y.."_Olr::~~"'~___ïJJ·_:~l_;._
.-- 4---, -~-- ßf , I, . '. '. 'I\\~'"
:t :?:':, :-',". ,I',~.r ,-' I.....
~~- "."'" "'OS5 l'"
"0:,:, '"0-1 "I!
~ DOGwOOD CT
1=
IT
..-..
""0' " IICIILANO
C·1
1553
<~u-,
'1."\ .
\\q.\r'-
I
n""" I" ,\t:--'"
; g \,~:~l·i ,--
~: ~~tl~l; .
I 10
z
I,. :
1- =
~
R-2
let!
C-1
1110
C·1
1602
R-J
1553
--1 'I QU'"
'.
: ~ I
,t'
\-
" .' - .-
;\ I. :',
, , 1
--+--~-r-
I
"' '"
,.
'nil-
:--1~- 1-l¡ - '.
I" '" '.,
.....""'~·..'"''"'n
i'
,
!)().
II')"
:- . --+--
GRfEN
1-
,
,
-=i "i'
LEAF al
(¡
1/\
.IOR
PARk 01
¡q
01
.-'1
·
·
i
CI::
G:l
!
ò
z:
«>
01
.- \
·
u,¡
...
j)
~
I ;:
7
· -
· r
H"
. .<).
":G~t~
II·
. ',t'\':
, ,\.\
f.
¥
AG
R-1-S
1903
;...
I \ 1,lt·'
)\1"- '
\ .11"\,.., ",.
01,
I I
'i n I"
R-J
1152
OLO MILL 10
"
'.
i. I... ',. '"
itl
( )
c:
C'O
....J
en
~
C)
::J
o
CI
R-J
1385
, .
- HI
II I
ZRJ
:-
(.)f--' '
R-3
1385
,,'(
GREEN I,r....f OR:
,
,
I
Iz
...
,I:)
m"'J'-I~
vnrr~-""";" I
'\--'\ '
1\,~l.l\.\ ! 1Il-2
. ¡:
; .¡t ~ 10'
à R-Z;-,
< Z
~ ,~
R-4-D· :;
Z
~
1-·
01
LINCOLN 01
~
COI""ER
II
RD
: 11\
&-=-2-:-1 !4 0 0
Hill rl\
'"
'-'
::-
0..
~
..
Road ~
'"
'"'
...
'"
'"'
'"
AG
'"
'-'
...
~
NR~
I
,. - 40;:
AG
1092
I·'
(
.::
..
ð
0..
..
-
-
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
~
..
j
~·__·_·_····~~"--_·_-_·_·~~·_--~~·_~_·~-__""'~________~o
\ C'-"
:r:) \.
,
.,1
\..~(1
'."ì
\ \ ...;/
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76180
817·581·5515
Application for Subdivision Plat Approval
NRH
(PIeu. pri1I11 rllpOnlu)
Application Type:
-0 Preliminary Plat
~ Final Plat
o RepJat
DShort Form
DAmended Plat
Property Owner Information:
Name of Property Owner:
¿'h_~4s
~.",~" ;,~ ¡{,/?
(/
Phone No.
Address of Property Ow~er:
.~~ ß~x /.ÇS
City:
State: iëx.....".
Zip: K 3~; -LJ¿,$S
Proposed Subdivision Name:
f'¿rA'Kh¥f/~N 6r~7ES
No. of Acres in Plat:
No. of Lots in Plat:
11
Authorized Agent Information:
Wote: An affidavit signed by the Bloperty, owner is required when the agent is not the property owner.
Þ1 .,. ~ £'1>11 ~N4Aiw é'.øl"~_u
Name of Authorized Agent: /Þ'f,A-¿ý/# ~",r~ Phone No. .ßII'" t/N.. ?I/Z)
Address: 1ßÞ/ ,ø'~Þ/ /}Á¿¿'
City: ~¿r)l Æ&+IM4' 4¿¿$
State: ~
Zip: ?~/ltI
Surveyor / Engineer fAformation:_. _ .
Name of Firm: If/WlFð P ~~
Address:
/i/ð &E¿lN¿T
~,?J
JJ~I( ;. 6¿>JV<f
~ ~/~¿(¡'¡;;-¿r;J ( ~¿,
¿"'.AlE ~#q ~rz /þ~
Phone No. ß/~ ~B/-IJ~/
City:
State:
OØ:J
Zip: ~"t5"~
Contact Person:
Plat Fee Calculation:
All PrelimInary Plats
a. Application Fee: $120.00
b. $1.50 perresidentlallot
or $5.00 per commercial acre:
T~~\H~
~ Ot:'f'J:1\!ffi~.
All Replats, Short Form Plats, and FInal Plats
a. Applicalion Fee: $120.00
b. $1.50 per residential lot
or $5.00 per commercial acre:
c. $65.00 for each street intersection:
d. County plat filing fee:
I. f)þ
All Amended Plsts
a. Application Fee:
b. County plat filing fee:
TotJJl Fee:
(none)
$58.00 .
$58.00
Total Fee:
$58.00 .
4/1-:Y~.
. Additional filing fees may be applicable
for oversize oUlxtra documents.
Time Wai. ettlf (tf'f'rwi6a ;j
The applicanl J,s. aware that action on tht;'pT]f mli(:/, take place for more than thirty (30) days and waives all time requirements for approval of the plat.
\~. S~'" ~ x:2
I certity thaI I am, or represent,. e owner of the property described above and hereby submit this subdivision plat 10 the City of North Richland Hills fOl consideration.
Date:
Your name (Printed Name): /J!¡..t/lK ~J 1"/1
Signature:
Subdivision Plat Application
~?~Cf1~38
CD . 418 (1 . 98)
· . .- ,.. "..,._-->~--.~""_.._~._...-..._._--~~------~---..~
Draft Copy
6.
PS 99-38
CONSIDER REQUEST OF MARVIN SMITH FOR A FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1 _
4, BLOCK 1, PENNINGTON ESTATES ADDITION. THE PROPERTY IS
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF DOUGLAS LANE AND
BURSEY ROAD.
APPROVED
Ms. Ratcliff explained that Marvin Smith has submitted a Final Plat of Pennington
Estates. The proposed Final Plat is for 1.842 acres zoned R-1 Residential. The
applicant is proposing to plat the property into four lots of approximately 20,000
square feet each.
Article 10 of the Subdivision Regulations requires that a masonry-screening wall
be constructed adjacent to Bursey Road (C4U residential thoroughfare). The
applicant is requesting a waiver from this requirement. Because the parcels front
on Bursey Road, the masonry wall would be located in the front yard where it is
not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance.
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve of PS 99-38 a
Final Plat of Lots 1 - 4, Block 1, Pennington Estates, and grant a variance from
the Subdivision Regulations, Article 10, Section 1010, O. Masonry Screening
Walls.
Mr. Nehring, seconded by Mr. Laubacher, moved to approve PS 99-38. The
motion carried unanimously.
P & Z Minutes
November 11, 1999
6
.",
i._ ..
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
\.-
Department: PlanninQ & Inspections Department
Council Meeting Date: 01/10/00
Subject: Reauest of Joe Wade for a Variance to the Minimum Agenda Number: LRC 99-08
Required 15-foot Landscape Setback on Lot 1, Block 1 Eaton Addition. This Property is
Located at the SWC of Harmonson Road and Rufe Snow Drive.
CASE SUMMARY
Mr. Joe Wade has submitted a request for a variance to Landscape Ordinance No. 2423
on Lot 1 Block 1 of the Eaton Addition. Specifically, the request is to vary from the 15-foot
landscape setback requirement along Harmonson Road where the applicant proposes to
provide a five-foot landscape setback. All other requirements of the Landscape
Regulations are satisfied. See the attached application and reasons listed by the applicant
for granting the variance.
The lot has 550 feet of frontage on Harmonson Road and is only 105 feet deep. Making
the parcel more narrow is a 7.5 foot utility easement to the rear that may not be developed
upon. Once parking and a maneùvering lane is added, the buildable depth is less than 40
feet. The long and narrow configuration of the parcel creates an awkward site plan. By
granting the variance to allow a five-foot landscape setback, a building depth of fifty feet is
possible.
As Harmonson Road is currently constructed, there is a 10-foot grassy area and sidewalk
between the property line and the curb. This would provide a 15-foot total buffer from
Harmonson. The applicant has worked diligently with stàff to see that the site meets all
other requirements of the landscape regulations.
RECOMMENDATION:
To approve a variance from Ordinance No. 2423, Section i.G. Landscape Setback to
allow a five-foot landscape setback along the Harmonson Road frontage of Lot 1,
Block 1, Eaton Addition.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds AvallaDle
'~
Finance Director
ead Signature
£~~
City Ma er Signature
\\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1\DATA\PZ\Cases\Landscape Review Committee\LRC 99-08-40 Rufe Snow.doc
Page 1 of 2
<:)
~ ~
I'
~ ,HIRE DR
1
"'"
R-1
G -17n
to.:¡
to.:¡
'"
,URe; CT
to.:¡ , 2'
:c: ~- ¡
:: ,_6~---
~, 2'~·
... ",,",0·
~ ;®-C~<\
'- :
-
TRA:~
@1R
l:r.. :!A,;:
--
1E
, :;:A?A
TR.2E; TR.2:.J
, l'
TF
2A2.A TR..2A~(
R-3-il700
'1796
"
12
~
c'
13
MIKE DR
I Þ. \) \) 3C' "0 _. " --
I ~ R-7-MF
~\~\)':> 1
~:\\"'~I
C þ.':> I 01,,:>3
~~.~
(")
LRC 99-08 :>
..
3::
BLOCK 1, LOT 1, EATON ADDITION :>
c
..
LANDSCAPE VARIANCE (-;-
R-3'
'...,-'-'\)
'::i~\ 5
G
R
"
TD..282
LR
..-
R-4-D
TRA:-' ..
'-'--.,\,?,'}.
~G"ßI
, <¿'ò'ò\O
0
1 ~ z
-'
>-
TR2Eu '"
Z
TR.2f.a 0
:I:
TR..2E4C
TR..2E<tD
1R1f 4(
TR.2[..r
"
TR
291
TO
29'
;\~~£f.\
~,,\) 4\
---1 WL E G-:-2--;-
> --
~" æ
c
~
~~þ.C~
" en
e~2~.
;:)
a:::
r-
"
PDl18
2006
I
TR rP
28: 2B3
'0·
~:.
-:::\,~
~...~~
1
"
TR2f1A
TR.QF
TR.2r1C
TR.,2fT
3
TF. TR. TR.
2G: I 2G: 2GJ
.'
8r-
~'
TR.2f"::
TR2TT ì
I
TIt ¡ TF, ¡
:l2V~Jr'_
R-3
.
T'P ¡ TF
~f I 2f"
TP
2:::'
TF,. TF.
20; i 2Gè
'J
""
1
TR2r:
1
-7-~~
~
-"
__ __~n _~___~_
I--
I
I~ i
I ~A ' I
, I
'--J
'n¡
¡ ,.1
16A
R-:3
..~,,\\\\~",
""C'''' i
#1",-
2.3
, R.2U<
'''''''
TF
2>:
TR TF TF. T", Ti:
::...0.: 'b:- :Jf .. :'.r- ?~ '
-.. 2.13
.IE
J:
~
,...
"
-'
~-
J" 3'. 2" 2è
TF_ T~ TF'
2K~ 21-:4 ] (~
T,
'0'
'"
""
'"
2.,
"
LR
""
C-2
1
TU-'
~\\~
þ>.~~' '
~\"
2
,
IC 19
12
i .:
-'i,\ ,
~:::"\,Y7'---
\,.
1'1'0
ffi2\lf
: i !
,,,!::> 12' 1'01'" I" 'r
, 1 . I
1: it
1f5 ! 15
"
\3
DR N
,
-Ht
--... £
<:),
-.:
-.
'"
""
'"
Q..
IN ST
'"
....
I
'"
..... "
~ ~ i €
'p~1-5
G c ì
~
".
"
3.'
I-
'"
'" "
4:
4:
.,
'0
,,) 1.'
)-1<!)-~
'"
:>'
\2.°;:'-(1
,v.
,¡..c~ it.
,¿;.",,;::
<"") \~'$'
,.
"
-----¡;o-
---.
p.~-
-
..
o
C')
"'
z
"'
1- ~ ~
"-~ ~ I I\)
: ~i:';"H!
14F ~ 1Y'
....-..
NRH
LANDSCAPE REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION
City of North Richland Hills
7301 NE Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX
817581-5500
(Please print or type all responses)
PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of applicant:
JOe: uJAtJ E:
Street address of applicant:
~Û> ~
City/StateJZip Code of applicant:
N. R R'J 1é~~ 76(rg ð
Telephone number of applicant: g17' "(77
FAX number of applicant: et7, 4~ ~- 63c
NOTE: If you are not the owner of the property, you must attach
Are you the owner of the
Are you the owner's agent?
property?
l&'J Yes D No
PART 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY INFORMATION
Subject Property Legal Description:
~i I DF
D
Yes
D
No
a letter from the property owner giving you permission to submit
this application.
~lð~ I
!Aro~ A lfbiliðJ
"IJÄ -liAR MeN ~
t?OA!)
Subject Property Street Address:
C()e~1.. Or Ru;'i .5"~ð~
PART 3. REQUEST TYPE
D Interpretation Request
¡S Landscape Variance Request
D Nonconforming Use
Current zoning classification:
Note: A map or plot plan of the property and drawings of the proDosed
~~'"
,,~ ,
construction must be submitted with this application. ~e apP1r or~
representatJves must be present at their scheduled jt,IiC ~ng. ,~J,"
-
II hereby certify that I am, or that I represent, the legal owner of the property described above and do hereby 'It thÏ$,~est for a
~ ,~
ð
C~z
COMMlec,ìA {
Date
Print Name ~~
variance for consideration by the Landscape Board Review.
/1 ,q ·t¡9
bJA- ~t-
Signature
4
t.J~..q~
PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date of Review Board Public Hearing: Taxes, Liens and Assessments Paid?
D Yes
D No
Case Number
l-R ~0¡9- O?
F...." .00 V ~
Variance Approved:
Date of Final Action:
D Yes
D No
Conditions of Approval:
This request will not be scheduled for hearing
until the application fee is paid.
K:\mary\LANDSCAPING\Landscape Application.doc 05199
4
PART 5. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
List the pertinent section(s) of the Landscape Regulations and indicate the specific
interpretation(s), variance(s), or nonconforming use exception(s) being requested.
~~ .~þ/.. I..~. LAÞJ~~QPI. ~i~# flJj 7ìN,ffU:f)1... -o€~tJì~f$
~ I~· Fëo'r ~-t79rCK,
6J~ Arc ~ t<éøtJe~/ì~? A v4ft;IIJâ f" At~6J If s- h.t 5f~dt.
State the grounds for the request and detail any special conditions that cause hardships that in
your opinion justify the variances or exceptions being requested. Explain any unique
circumstances, if applicable, not considered by the Landscaping Regulations:
-A gçjlj,J hJ Sf.(. E?Al:~ Ò'\~hJLh AðVt.R.5~~Y íMÞAd ,II
~ d ~t)ì l.bìtlq oJ~ CA.) ptJ..C,/. i),J r&...ì~ ~Ptr¿tt.
~6 7¡£ ¿iut TI.t (),Jitc ~ðtJL~ ~"Öì~;{.¿)C.t fD ~Jt~
~F" cog t) i IT ~ ì n A Ç1 r;t lbJ ¡::;;, t- ~~ f- fi~.
K:\mary\LANDSCAPING\Landscape Application.doc 05199
5
z [I
(j ,
~ '
ì~ v
~(J)
~-
iTI
-0
ç:
Z
,
,
~~I
,0
tIt
'ú
71 I
mil I
('i I
10, I
~, I
[;",/1
() , I
z
n I
, I
I ¡:
L,
.//,
1<0 I Iii
I
I
I
I
I
~ I
I
I I
I I
I;; II
I I I
1 , I
I :
ê·:-:-''JC<;;:E''E ~."
~~4N"IE'L
I
~. ..
-" .. .j'
- '~'. -
-..... '--
-'- 11
.. -"""
.t:'__i.
11"
j.;]
~' le~5>4 NeeD eo, 42 E
,':' ~T~I~;M;;'~Î-
I - - I
I I
1 I I
I I
I
I I ~
I E ~I
: ~æ ¡)I
I ~~~
I <'IF
Q
I ~
, I
11,1
I
ì())
t
l~··
fJ
~
-''-.-.
..
\)I
~. { z
~ ~ ~I
AJ~
~E
()~
r
I~]
1~1
I i
i ,;
I
,
, I
!>VJ1!
1JAJX
~~U;
om -
1· tt;
(ì {
J
T1 ~
;;
,11( ¡
() -'
() ()) M
AJ ( > V
J1! ¡) nJ
IT! 'j c:
-< -
r
Q
~
1:
I þ.
I" ~
\~
[.} J l~ ()
r ¡-
Iv Z
I~
I I· (j)
Ii ()
J1! I~I
I Z
I
I i~ I\); ]
T
I ~
I ~'I
~() I~J
I
I
I ïU
I ()
I f
0 Þ.
I . j 1
(') tJ
I lU
J1!
I ~
~ c
v
I I>
4'
I AJ
1,
I (j)
u'
I l
(~ ! J'Vm
~~~ ,
('i I -( >
0 ~;i¡,
1,11 ob z
J'þbl 1
' 1 () { \
r i::jllt
·x
I EiP
þ-i
,--- ñt~
~
I
..
o.,.)
11 I
7
T1
~~
m~ ~
f,;"'j _
-< {)
~
..
r J
1
r ~ w
I,:"J
.J>
...r>
m
\Ì' ------1-
~
1 \
1~ RUFE ~ ~NOW
o '~
----~--"L~_~-- ___~---e~-----m, f
[\r1 "\
I·
J
..
I]
r
I
II
DRivE
" ,
: ¡
11
!> G\ lU
5- ~ m
~ ( > ~
l-n J]4
I~
z
-f \jf
" ~
(p ( >
r:
m ~
-f (J!
OJ ï~
J>. m()
~ 11
m
ÃI
(p -j
0 --<
P- m
E
~ I>
r
^
¡J>.
ú) u
Z
W '1 CJ
.. f-- l-
f- W Z '" I-- lL lL
U <1 lL
0 ;:; W 2 \3
¡¡: ~ ¡¡: :! (j ,i)
Z --.J '1 I-- ' 'j)
W U ~~ G Æ
<J) æ W If> ,¡¡
--.J W Z ~ æ '" ,¡¡ -;
3 'r () r
~ <I ill -I UJ r <í\ 0\
U UJ <I ;¡; I-- -'r 0\
I- UJ tl) 3 ~ 'r UJ ><{ ì-
~ ¡¡; ;;::: 'r UJ ~ ...J æ 1: ~3
I-- Z > <I (Ü
æ U ...J () æ ¡¡; Q ~ æ I-- æ W:! <{
f- UJ ;¡; <I W ~ UJ
u æ Q Z .... I-- ....U
U ...J<fl UJ I- <I <{ <I ~ ~~ f-
)0- I-- ~ D
::r UJUJ I-- UJ ~ --.J (L 3 <J) <{
~ 0;;:; <I UJ Ð Uœo '4
~ '3 <J) 0 -II ill
Z--.J æ t- N N ð :!~ Q w
:JW t- <J) W UJ 0 0 0 tlé Z
ü: ~~ -I) <fl -I) X 11. [l Um<fl
t- <t W UJ W LJ '1
~ ~ ~ ~ W (L <fl ( ) ( ) ðUõ ~
ú) ~:! U <I ~ 0 0 Q LJ UJ W
UJ <fl \,} ~ Ii' (LLJ
Z ;:: UJ{L t- ;:: I- <f) 0 {L (L :nS J: :3 ú)
<fl 0':1 <f) Ð <f) 0 Oz 0 0 ~ Z <!UJ
X X ~ I-- <f) --.J (j U(j
0 X ZUJ X ...J <1<1 æ ~ d.ÐG <{ --.J !i! tl)- ill
UJ ::¡... UJ W UJ U -I -r > {L (L 0>
U '1 ~~ D
-1 ... ~
0
,..--, B G~0@J0 @] ~tID~ [£] ... !D --.J{L
L=J I
~ g g
<I º º
1: U U
1M UJ ill
It: 0 a
lM<;J13M 'NIW
~ ~
~ ~
l::in? SlN'\7'ìd
Hld3CI ìle<;
&!\ &!\
r r
è!3dlì'<7? '" '"
S>N1?'7dS
~ i ~! ~
d) i û\ i f'i"'\
UJ
¡(J
UJ
1:
'~
z
ú)
...J
ill :5 ~
-1 ~ z
Ô ~ ~
ill CJ <f)
:r ~ ~
U z UJ
ú) G 6
ú) ~ ~
f- 0
Z
<{
-1
0..
.J
-'
<1
:r
<f)
't
12
~Æ
<II--
3 ill
~G;
Oæ
OW
.1.;;1
tD;;:::
r:æ
.11.
W,i)
...
~íñ
UJ
>
-I
-
~
<I
~
::r
ill
ill
::I
U
æ
UJ
Ö
~
<1
1:
:::J
:!
<J)
':L
<I
C)
o
UJ
æ
m ifi ifi
~ ~I~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
W ill W
t-
UJ
~
t-
ill
Q
':1.
...J
<t
3
W
o
;¡j
Q
<{
~
<{
':L
U
<{
(Q
f-
ill
ú)
'"
N
N
'"
N
'"
-;
'r
I-
~ u
&UJ Ö
æz U
(L::J
r-L-
I ~
, i J,
~I "
;¡"I
i
f-
Z
o
~
J.L
~ ~ I ~
UJ
<f)
<1
w
z
'Ï
U
<1
U
<t
t-
<J)
[
>-
~<1
...J~
~œ
:£ ~ 8
w
o w X
Z <I Ðw
w (L ;::I
<f) ...J w~
<t £> ...J'r
1: ;¡j º...J
~ <J1 :r--.J
Q <t iLO
C) ¡¡: <t:r
x \'J ~ ~
~ . ~ w 0:-
~ ~It~
:::J 2 iì 0
t- It
~1t:J
:r"lm
~ 6&
õ 0 ~
;;::: ;; 0
~
UJ
Ö
UJ
U
æ
o
ill
t-
o
11.
D-
U
1)i
, I
~_"'J
-;
æ
o
<i
0:
:::J ,i)
æ~ ~
w æ 'Ç
¡(J \'J <1
(L
w .
:J U
--.J 0
m ,
\'J!::!
iDo
, UJ
w...J
IL -!
o <I
æ:ß
- z
--.J _
U
(L
UJ
:r
U
<!
I--
<J)
[
W
If)
<1
w
z
'Ï
\j
<f)
<f)
UJ
¡)I
{L
r
\j
o
~
(L
ill
W
~
I--
W
<f)
W
:r
I--
r:
--.J
UJ
æ
<!
o
UJ
\j
u w
11. U ¡(J
1<1
W
ill
:::J
úì
1f\
.. r:::
W
I-
C)
Z
o
.,
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning & Inspections Department
Council Meeting Date: 1/10/00
Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Request of Regency Realty Agenda Number: SRC 99-05
for an interpretation of the Sign Regulations, Ordinance No. 2374, Section 13, to allow
two pole signs for a multi-lot development. The property is known as Block 4, Brentwood
Estates Addition in a C1-Commercial District. The property is located at 8900 North
Tarrant Parkway
It has been determined that the Master Multi Tenant Sign Plan showing two pole signs for
the subject development does comply with the sign regulations. The applicant has
submitted a request to withdraw their request for interpretation. The notice to the paper
and surrounding property owners has been sent and therefore the public hearing must be
opened.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.) --J
Operating Budget
t er
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Finance Director
~~
City Man er Signature
\\NRH_CITY _HALL\VOL 1\DATA\PZ\Cases\Sign Review Committee\SRC 99-03-04 Richland Bus Ctr.doc
Page 1 of 1
LINE -
AG
TR.1JE1
JR.Œ
-R.l3AJ
TR13D
TReEl
;H
~~
-1
- I~
'II
)~
SRC 99-05
TARRANT PARKWAY PLAZA
LOTS 1 R1 ,2R1 ,3R & 7R, BLOCK 4, BRENlWOOD
ESTATES
TRDC2
IR.=
TR.OC
~R.\JA
,,\)\J~
\'?- .
\:>,\)
_\2
+RBA
TRlJCl
AG
::J/ '3,
fR,I,CT 4f:
-------
TFW:T 4B
--------,
'4
~RACT .3A
".
'RACT 4A,
"
C-1
1198
-'.--,
. ."
~:" ;~
"-.. -'-..
TRAC T 3A2 ~. ___________
TRACT 3Cl
CRACT .tAl
NORTH TARRANT PKWY
rRACT .;81
PKW'i
C-1
1254
TRACT .3ß
"'"REA
-1
TRACT 5A
C-l
1664
AG
-I
-I :c
= 0
(II '"
-I Z
~ ~
m
(') C
CI
-I m
C
'"
'"R~88
">.8C
""
~R.80
TRlIH
:qN
"RlD AG
'R_&
TR.ßG
"~
AG
-pm
LINE - SEE GT\d· 90-444
Tti f) R N ().M,.f
¥ (.~..
Pa.ge: D3 )
'\ \ I I I \
,~C "'H,\'H_·~,-"i~:E_H ~_ L _ _'J_
ADOPTED: March 22. 1993 CURRENT
"lI.ðC::
C-1
231
R 7;1.4
January 11.
90-448 Page:
CITY OF N$RTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning & Inspection Services
January 5, 2000
Ms. Bertha Ballew
Regency Realty Corporation
8140 Walnut Hill Lane
Dallas, TX 75231
- -
RE: Master Multi Tenant Sign Plan for Tarrant Parkway Plaza
Dear Ms. Ballew:
In reviewing the appeal for the "Sign Review Board Application," it was discovered that
an error was made in interpreting the plans that were submitted on September 13, 1999
for the Master Multi Tenant Sign Plan. The area tabulations are entitled "buildings" but
are actually broken down into specific areas of use (retail, restaurant, etc.). At the initial
review, this information was misinterpreted as building areas rather than use areas.
After a second review, the City concurs that there are indeed three buildings that
exceed a floor area of 10,000 square feet. This negates the item #2 of the review letter
(attached) dated October 9, 1999 to Oswaldo Cajas. The pole signs as indicated on the
submittal are considered approved.
Once the other items contained in the letter are clarified and/or corrected, the City will
issue a letter acknowledging approval of the Master Multi Tenant Sign Plan. Then the
permit applications for each sign to be constructed may be submitted and as long as
each application is consistent with the Master Multi Tenant Sign Plan, the permit will be
issued. I certainly apologize for any confusion. Should you have any additional
questions, please call.
Sincerely,
CC: Oswaldo Cajas, T. J. Callaway Architects
Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning
r.O Bùx 820F.09 . !>Jürth~icn!anj Hi!ls, Texas· 76182-0609 USA
7301 Northea.st Loop 820 . 817 -58: ·551 <+ . FAX 817 -656-7538
CITY OF N$RTH RICHLAND HILLS
October 18,1999
Planning & Inspection Services
Mr. Oswaldo Cajas, Associate
T. J. Callaway Architects, Inc.
17770 Preston Road, Suite 125
Dallas, Texas 75252
RE: Master Multi-Tenant Sign Plan Submittal for the Retail Development at the SWC
of Davis Boulevard and North Tarrant Parkway
Dear Mr. Sirs:
The plans submitted for application for the Master Multi-Tenant Sign Plan been
reviewed. Prior to the issuance of sign permits for any part of the project the Master
Multi-Tenant Sign Plan must be approved and on file. All signs permit applications must
comply with the Master Multi-Tenant Sign Plan. The plans do not conform to the city's
sign regulations and may not be approved as yet. You may choose to revise the plans
to conform to the regulations and resubmit or you may appeal as outlined below.
Following is a categorized listing of items that do not comply with the sign ordinance:
1. The combined total square footage of all the proposed buildings is stated at 108,360
square feet. In order to qualify for a Major Development "bonus sign" the
development must have at least 200,000 squared feet in combined floor area.
Revise the plans to show only one pole sign.
2. Pole signs are permitted when a building on a lot exceeds 10,000 square feet in floor
area. One pole sign is permitted for this development. However, the maximum
height is 20 feet. Correct plans accordingly.
3. Pole signs are required to be landscaped at the base with a combination of bedding
plants, shrubs and/or ornamental trees. The landscaping is required a distance of
4'6" from the base of the sign in all directions. Provide details.
4. Pole and monument signs are to be constructed of masonry materials matching the
material of the buildings. Provide note so indicating.
5. Provide details for each of the monument signs to show the setback. Provide
additional details to show the location of the monument signs located adjacent to
drives to verify visibility requirements. Monument signs require landscaping
consisting minimally of turf materials in a distance of at least 4'6" from at least two
sides. Revise as needed.
6. Pole signs and monument signs must be separated (straight line) from any other
pole or monument sign by at least 100 feet. Clarify as needed.
7. Figure #9 of the attachment indicates the verbiage "Liquor." Please delete this item.
8. Figure #11 seems to show a building that does not show up on the site plan. Clarify.
9. Figure #12 is described as a building sign.
:J '-:: 3c:< 320609· I'Jcr:h ;:ìic,'lland ~i!ls. Texas· 76182-0609 USA
ï2Cl ^'/or:heast LOCD 820· 8"17-531-5514, FAX 817-656-7538
,......._..,--....._~-~,.--~---~.~----
Mr. Oswaldo Cajas
October 18, 1999
Page 2
However, the drawing seems to indicate a ground mounted sign. Clarify.
10. Figures #14 & #15 detail canopy signs. The maximum height of letters on canopy
signs is 12 inches. The maximum height of logos on canopy signs is 16 inches.
Provide detail to clarify.
You do have the option of appealing this denial to the-Sign Review Board (Board). The
City Council is the Sign Review Board. The Board is empowered to hear appeals where
it is alleged there is error on any order, requirement, decision or interpretation of the
zoning regulations; and, to authorize variances from the terms of the sign regulations.
Should you choose to appeal this denial or request an interpretation, you must file your
appeal within fifteen (15) days of the date of this denial. The Board meets the second
and fourth Monday of each month at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall.
Please note that the appeal must be filed with the Planning & Zoning Department, no
later that 21 days prior to the meeting date. Should you have any questions regarding
the appeal, please contact the Planning Department at (817) 581-5528.
CC: Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning
Permit Denial File
,'~'
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Plannina & Inspections Department
Council Meeting Date: 1/10/00
Subject: Public Hearina to Consider Reauest of Bank of America. Agenda Number: SRC 99-06
for a variance from the Sign Regulations, Ordinance No. 2374, Section 13, to allow a
pole sign. The property is known as Lot 1, Block A, Northland Shopping Addition in a
C1-Commercial District. The property is located at 6100 Rufe Snow Drive.
Bank of America has submitted three separate proposals for a sign to be located at their
facility at 6100 Rufe Snow Drive. The attached proposals are numbered in order of the
applicant's preference. Proposal #1 requires three variances to the Sign Regulations,
Proposal #2 requires one variance, and Proposal #3 is allowed by-right.
· Attached proposal #1 would require the following variances:
.'-
Section 13.A.1.b When Permitted
To allow a pole sign where the area of the principal building is less than 10,000 square
feet.
Section 13.A.1.d Maximum Heiaht
To exceed the maximum sign height of 20 feet by five feet allowing a 25-foot high pole
sign.
Section 13.A.1.i Material Reauirements
To not require a double pole structure and not require the poles to be covered with
masonry material that match the principal building thereby allowing a single pole with no
masonry material coverage.
· Attached proposal #2 would require the following variance:
Section 13.A.1.b When Permitted
To allow a pole sign where the area of the principal building is less than 10,000 square
feet.
· Attached proposal #3 requires no variances. The applicant has applied for and been
granted a permit for a monument sign.
RECOMMENDATION: To Deny SRC 99-06 in its entirety for 6100 Rufe Snow Drive,
Lot 1, Block A, Northland Shopping Addition. Although a pole sign previously existed
on this site, the absence of the sign structure negates any legal non-conforming status.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
her
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds AvallaDle
'-
-~
Finance Director
t Head Signature
~C::~
City Mana r Signature
\\NRH_CITY _HALL\VOL 1\DATA\PZ\Cases\Sign Review Committee\SRC 99-03-04 Rlchland Bus Ctr.doc
Page 1 of2
_L
J/ATCH LINE - SEE Grid:
-- ;';'¡'
:III
C
DR
SRC 99-06
BANK OF AMERICA
NORTHLAND SHQPPING ADDITlpN, BLK A, LOT 1
,,//
------
-~
I ,,------
I ______/ /,/
1 V" /
/~/------------
_.____.....:::~ ___~___._._______.___._.____.___._.____n
( MATCH LINE - SEE Grid: 78-428 P~ge: 87 )
>II
I~A~
>
,..
'" u
<
---"
:;;¡
<
,..
:...--~
I~\C"
¡ ~'t
'\
'f..y,(,y~C 'è.3í'0'ó
\\\\,\.;
25
TRlE-4
45 I ~6 i
:=J
-) I !
WATAUGA ROAD
I
~
l
",
4.
c;O'A
TR.1ClL
TJ
TR.1A
TR.IClN
1CiNI
/
~ l
)' " \,\)S
, ~\S t:'-
\.; 'SC\) \) \)
;::> ð.oð.f;)ò
TRlCl
..
t'R.lctJ
--1-.l~_L-...L-.L_..L.-..L..-..L-..1.-.l_
,'¡si.n 11 Jan 91 16:00:06 Tu..day
;p.oml. zatlos.grid.oml plot: b6_bw.rtl
D
J
J
\\ \' 1\
~Q)?-'\ ,,<1 1\
.-'--J \,\,,,,1->
;¡;
o
z
:5
:z:
u
;¡¡
:x:
,..
..
o
z
'è.ÎJ\f;)';)
D~
'-'
I
I
I
MID CITIES BLVD
II
I I
C-1
C-1
1778
,
'" \;t).'A\)
~ù?-:S~~.G_
I_;\:\()\'\'~~~S?; 6 i
';:) Cp
30?,qÎJ
1
R-
4P
a=:
Q
~
o
z
V)
¡----,
I I
I I
- I
I
I
rn \.A,~
C-1
5R
I
I
B-,
,..
1-2
A
en en « ( .) ~ u :!:
'" en u > > ""
en a, ¡¡( ~ :i '"
'"
a, ...- w '"
...- :!: ;= z
en ...- « 0
w LL c:
~ 0 '"
..:; "" .2!
z :::s
« '"
...- OXI 0
... S! ~
.. 0 mlO
.. ~¡ t;;
zw ...- 0- , ~
"m i5
m~ 0:1 0- 0 ~ i=
~::> ~ ::¡ ~
oz 3Iz u u
~
~
';¡<,
.......
&
<::i
G
2:t ~~ :","'0'" Q
¡:¡~ ~iò "'''' ~~
(J) NN au})":'r-:, ¡~
c: ~~ ~~ ~~ ~=
~ ~~ ~~ ~~ n~
~ "' ~ii
'"C >'" ~ æ ...~ '
æ ;5 ~~ ~ : ~!~
.I::. ~::!~ ~ ~ ~r:1
U z~ 01~ ~8ë :~;
;¡~ >z -N~ ~!iQ
~ 03 ~~ 2~~ ~~!
~ ~~ ~(I ~~g ~~,
w
~
Q
..
..
0
I "
"Z Q
"" z¡¡
.. ~ i~ ..
.. Ii 9
H 5 ! ã ~
w
'"
W
::J:
C '"
~ fhe~
Q. W(I)w
« C::J:>
..... z......o
~ ~gu
S Xzli<
t ~~~
=> §«g¡
8 . ~ (I)
er:: e?WLL
0. ""'0
I I
I
r
.....
w
OXI
o
z -
6 ~
~ 9
« u
Q~~
...,OW
~~~
~~3
en«
""...
"''''w
wU:!:
~~wz
LL",
~~~
w",:!:
~,.;,~
g:~~
~
z
o
~
..
::J:
!::'"
3:0.
c:!:
wS
~,
z~
-::J:
:!:...
=>::J:
:jQ
-.....
~::ë
~c
z«
"'E
wo
~æ:
.....w
wZ
..0XIl::>
",og:
w~::;¡
>0«
8~5
...«-
~Q~
0.""0
o.«-J
=>:!:u
(l)o~-
cci......õV>
Lf~~9
~~:;~
z''''::;¡
-Q:: t<r)W
::!:w.......V>
::J>Ou
-JoLfJ-
c(uN:j
. W ' «
U')V)~~
~ëã~~
ª
..
i
I!;
~
~
¡¡
-
~
'I
L,I
I
rl íd
*uJ ~
9 U
.-
- ...
....
.11 c» ~~
q.
"- E
-= ....
- - ~ ~
I' I ~ ~ cz:
11 ...
II> <r
I ~ ....
0
,__- -- '" 0
Jd I .:.::
au
- C
=- ~
Z
II CIa
LJ ...
_UJ Do -
f--j
"o-,~
f----1
,,~h~
I I -
"O-,L "O-,8~
(\!5 I -lH'\rO "O-,SZ
"
""
uw
«u
0XI:f
t¡;LL
"'0
!!!w
",c
wV;w
1:;!5;!!!;
UO~
1i<~1!!
o"'z
8:LL.tl
~~~
3:JVj !N3NVI' :I]d
)
[~I
3:JVj Q3ÐNIH
z
9
>
0.
LL
d
as
:f
:!:
=>
z
~
::::s
.....
«
i:n
'"
...-
-J
W
OXI
o
z
6 -
~ ~
« 9
5 <;>
~~~
:!:g~
ol::>u
......*~
...0.....
zen«
-'...
~a~
","'w
~~~
Lf~~
2r¡~
C""::J:
«zu
"'OXI_
"'.;,
~OC-J
-,Zw>
~æ~~~
~êi~6U:
E::J~~~
3:~:f~Œ
O......~o,)LL
gfa~~ëw
-':I:......>wu
OV)(/')OCc(
z~e::z:I:u.
« LL«3:'"
>05w ~
Q.O>~~V)
Owc(-"C
U:j:J:ŒP/'lZ
C-OLl'l~O
W:!:......NN"I~
!5xx~cV)
o~~ozz
"'0.0.>«0
0000000
~
¡ 1i!~h;;;,
¡¡ 9~jU~~'"
::: ù~c:z:cfu ~
o 0000000
2 ZIIIi¡
; ~3~¡è=~;1
eta "A.Q;>z~5~
æ 0000000
ë lllið!1!!~¡
I*g~~~~~
II.\ f¡¡ucu~
-:t1
~
~
Cl..
()
tt
r-
I
au
-
=-
D
Z
au
I
L-
5>
....
II
q.
"-
....
-
Z
0
...
>
- Do
I&.
.......
ç D
"O~ :E
0
þo
III
::a
u
I
I
'" en <c 3: ~ 0 ~
'" en u >
en .;, ¡¡¡ 0 '" ><
'" ~ W z :Ii
.;, ~ '" c.i
en ~ W
~ <c LL z
~ LL ::>
0 '"
...:; >< 0
z 0
'" <c ~
!XI
.. ~ ~
0 ~
.. ~¡ ¡¡¡
z~ ~ 5 z
u" .. ~.. ~
~i 0,. ... § ~
"'=> ::¡ ~~
;tz ¡¡¡ u ¡¡ ..0
8?
$!j
"'.tt
....,
{;;
C;)
r;
H
"ZA~~
H
,,'jiZZ
~\\
en ~~ ~~ ª wE
& ~~ ~~ ~ ~=
iii ~~ ~~ ~ :5
.! ~ ~ ~ U~
" ;:: g 5;~
ã '<~ ~ ~ ~~~,
.c ŠfB5 ~ ð ~d
u ~~ ~ð ~8~ i~~
~ _5 8~ 0:;;3 ~H
~ ~ð ~~ ~~8 !~~
"œI"N
~ ~I
'" ""
z
9
>
"-
LL
6
ai
~
~
::>
z
:¡¡
::>
...J
<c
...J
W
!XI
o
z
6
!:;;! ~
<c 9
Q 9
~~:¡¡
~g~
oOu
~B3
zen<c
if;::'1i;
,u~
~~~
~~o
LLLn~
~c:~
c><x
<czu
"'!XI_
LI'J
'"
~
»
....
II
U:>
....
"-
t<)
I:
III
-
:II
Z
5
A.
~
~
~
~
!ë
D
¡;;
D
~ U
U z D
.. ~ ziii
.. ii ..
c ~ S !i; ~
é¡ !!! z
d ~
3JI(~ lN3NI( If¡ 3J
"''''
~~ß~
dz~z:!
II wo..S;...J
~Q.~cÜ:
~o wCr:::
t::J~Cr:::~
3:~~~i!
O....Q::'u..
00::>"'-
owV)rgow
...JOJ:Iñ"'WU
~~e::c~Lf
<c"-LLZ3:'"
>oðwc( ~
o.c>wOV1
8~~~J;~
...J "'0
ß~~~~~
~XXlJ1cfJ)
~~~~~~
~I
~
C,)
.-
..
~+~
c
~
co
~I
H--I
t)a,,%Ü
i
!ë
,.
:!;
::I
¡¡
~
~
..
3J1(~ 03ÐNIH
...J
W
!XI
o
z
6 ~
!:;;! 9
<c 0
¡s~i
...ow
~5~
gs3
¡Q~~
~~~
ü:~z
~~~
W"'~
~,.::~
ë1:~~
'" '"
u u
9 9
~
o
..
,,~h9
,~
I
'lH'\I"O "o-,oz
OJ:
1;:",
3:"-
o~
w5
~~
-OJ:
~...
::>OJ:
=JQ
-...J
~~
~o
z<c
"'E
~g
~co
c
z
W
....
!XI
W
~
u
<c
"-
'"
'"
c W
Iñ ~
u
...
'"
o
"-
ci~g;
Õ~IJ')
oo~~o
a~~~
W
"-
ã:
....
W
W
Iñ
¡:;¡
'"
~
'"
u
9
---1
~
:I
III
-
=-
A
Z
III
»
....
,II
U:>
......
"-
t<)
1
z
o
-
:¡
:Ii
III
... Q
III i::i
:;
Z ø
o i::i
... G
>- iñ
A. 9
(
... \L
~~
1
0000000
!! :¡~I¡" -"
z -e;l 0(
¡¡¡ ~~nhi ~
..
~
D 0000000
Z -4Z~CIII¡
§ ~)(¡"'O"'~2
.. ...~ï~~~ ~
¡¡¡ 0000000
t;
ë G£ðl:ll~¡
~e~¡¡!~!
ii! a i5~
co
~
1
o
r-t
CD '" <{ ;¡: X 0 :.
~ u I- >
'" ¡¡; 0 "" ""
N ,;, z :i
m w VI
cO :. w oi
'" <{ LL Z
~ LL :::J
0 ""
~ "" 0
Z 0
<{ ~
N CD <D
... w
.. 0 ...
.. ~; ~
zw ~ ...
".. i!i ~
iß~ 0:1 ... ~ ~~
"'::> ¡¡¡ :J
02 ~z U Ü
~
~
':Yf
"'v
?¡
C::)
&
~
f;-
Õ)
f
~
\
'?
<c
§~ ~~ ~8 \lE
(J) ~~ d?~ ~~ ;!
c ~~ ~~ ':]~ ~III
en :!:! éé ~~ lIIe
ü5 N~ N~ ~~ ~8~
~ - - - U~
Q) ~E~
=c == ~ e:=a.
c: ~~ ~ ~ ~!~
ItI ;:~ 'ž:~ ;¡ is ~o~
.c ð~ "Q;: . ;~.
U ~~ ~Q ~~~ ~~~
~ -~ ;g~ ¿;w~ ~H
~ ~~ ~~ ~~8 ~.c
~
0
1;;
:¡¡
¡; "
.. " z 0
.. ~ 2 ¡¡¡
.. i ~ ... 9
"
~ 0 2 0
~ ¡¡ 5æ w z
::i " a :5
~ ~¡ ~¡
li~ï.~~;I¡I¡I¡lnÞilir¡lit¡lililill
11111111111111111 11111111111111111111
I.I~I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.'.
'"
u '"
~ "
'" '"
'" -' IJ
\!) 525'
z '"
'"
;: 0 :;;9
.., z
.. Ò ...",
j æiG
'" ¡;¡ '" '"
" J!...
... " ;..tiE .. "'"
'" ¡J", J! ZJ!
Z
¡¡¡ J:'" '" " J: :s 00
" <~ ...'" ~~ '" ~$ 0 J!...
u ~G- §:¡¡j "'", ~~ "'"'
Ie i2u "''' Uu
~tI~ 0", "" U !!... ~¡¡;z
<ñ <!).. "'''' !:~ 00
~áS::i 9o<! "'3 '" ...'" :3 "J: "''''
<i -'''' ~ z!,2 0-
~"' ~N~ ",'" ~",~~ijJ ~L< ...",
z'" '" ~~ "':S
J!~ ,u~ <~ _I.OZJ:C >z J! "'" t¡;",
ff)~~ ~ï~3:5 ¡:¡'" -''''
"'II:> tJ! '" =" Z'"
;1;", -' Z iD~
~ò~ 01:j >o",$u ...'" <!) ?:¡ E
~'" ~>"( )~ "'''' ""
3~ u-' "'0 ~ -'0
","''' "'.. ~~æ~š Zz ~2 Uu
~~ ","'~ "''' ~ò ~ "'z
zo
õ,<~ ~i1i 1:j..",,,,~ " ",J: "'u
~1 ~~ J: ...!:: Oz
;:¡zu ~¡j ...J~C:Z::! ~
"'- ß..<:><lL ;1;~ ~o
¡I:lm'Ir:m9Ict¡IiIPi'i'i'i'ill I
. I· I I I I I I I I I
¡aI I, ~ 111111111111111111I
'. ~ " 111111111I11111111I
I ~ I I I I I I I 1'1
.1 ... 111111111111,111.11
. a.. 11111111I
I, CI) 11111111111111111,'
II E 1111111,111111111,'
I I I I I I I I , I I
" -"" 11111111111111,1,1.
,I ~ 1111111111,1.1,1,1,
,I '4- IIIIIIII.I.I,I.I.IR
,I e IIIIIIIIIIII.'II~I!~
,I ~ 1111111111.'.I.løll!.
,I C 111111111111,1,1,1.
,- 1111,11111,1,1,1,1.
,I· ~ 11,1,1,11111,1,1.1.
. ~ 1111IIIII
dI I, ~ 111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1.1"
w N. 1111,1,1.1.1,1,1,_.1
I~.~IJI!I!!I~'"-I,,-I~I~I,,IJI!IJI!I,,-I~I~I~.~I~.~I~
I------+.---~ --------t
'193 ,,01 ·V3
r I
010H "g
+-----_._~---_._-~--~_.
,,0-,9
,,"IiO-,'¡"
------_.__..._-~-
",/\g-.o¡
0000000
vi~
~ ¥~~i~ ¡
! 9~;~;sib
::: ù~.c:z:co._ t-
o 0000000
~ ,...... ~GI~
!; ~~~; ~Ea
CD 11.0.0.> ~.....c
~ 0000 00
o 5,. ~~
~é::I -'I
¡w~~ ~~
..... :::t :1:'"
<U U uc
~
~
1
Q
o
p:
.¡~ <;>
0"
¡:,~ ~
a JI
z ~
:s
==
1~ 1M
-
:II
N~ ICI
Z
:s Z
1M
\!)
z
¡¡:
"
u
'"
a
Z
:s
~
""
5'
.....
II
~
z
o
¡:
=
III
...
III
~
Z
III
:E
:I
Z
o
:E
...
"-
ICI
-,
/
/
,
t
l
i
,
RECTI DEC
Q 100q
NRH SIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION
City of North Richland Hills
7301 NE Loop 820
(Please print or type all responses) North Richland Hills, TX
817581-5500
PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of applicant
Phillip J. Peters (for Bank of America)
Street address of applicant:
..
HM - 7700 Terry Drive OFFICE - 400 S. Zang Blvd., 11th Floor
City/StatelZip Code of applicant Telephone number d apPlicant2 /
HM Ft. Worth, TX 76180 - - 14 948-2291
- FAX number of applicant 214/948-2272
OFFICE - Dallas, TX 75208
Are you the owner of the Are you the owner's agent? NOTE: If you are not the owner d the property, you must attach
property? Bank of a letter from the property owner giving you permission to submit
America
liJ Yes 0 No ~ Yes 0 No this application.
PART 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY INFORMATION
Subject Property Legal Description:
NorthiliandShopping Addition BLK A LOT 1
Subject Property Street Address:
6100 Rufe Snow Drive, Ft. Worth, TX 76148-3313
(N. Richland Hills)
PART 3. REQUEST TYPE
0 Interpretation Request [!J Sign Variance Request o Nonconfonning Use
Current zoning classifICation: Note: A map or plot plan of the property and drawings of the Proposed
Commercial constructfon must be submitted with thIs application. The applicants or their
representatives must be present at theIr scheduled public hearing.
II hereby certify that I am, or that J represent, the legal owner of the property described abOIle and do hereby submit this request for a
variance for consideration by the Sign Board Review.
Date 10/25/99 S~~~
Print Name Phillip J. Peters -=-
PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Dåfe of Review Board Public Hearing: Taxes, Uens and Assessments Paid? Case Number
o Yes 0 No CUJ\ 0.D 10
~,,-, I I l
Variance Approved: Date d Final Action: C. Fees: $175.00 Non-res~ -
0 Yes 0 No ~ $100.00 Residential
r
- e ~ ~_ \ of ~L:O'-\ (::;::)6 J
Conditions d Approval; This request win ~ot be scheduled for hearing
.
until the application fee is paid.
K:\mary\SIGNS\Sign Control Application.doc
5
05199
Planning & Inspection
Department
Memo
Date: January 5, 2000
Re: Sign Variance Request for Bank of America, 6100 Rufe Snow
To: Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning
From: Ed Dryden, Building Official
You are processing a variance request to permit the reconstruction of a pole sign at 6100 Rufe Snow.
There is a letter dated October 1, 1999 to Mr. Steve Norwood from Mr. Phillip Peters. The letter seems
to imply that the City required the removal of the pole signs when a sign company applied for a sign
permit. If this is the implication, then I am reporting that this is a far departure from the facts.
The City never directed anyone to remove any signs from either location. In fact, it seems that the sign
companies removed the signs with no discussion with the City. The signs were cut off at the base with
a cutting torch. After the signs were removed, the City was then and only then approached regarding
replacement. At this time, the sign contractors were advised that the pole signs could not be
reconstructed. The city has since approved a monument sign for the Rufe Snow location but no
application has ever been filed for the Bedford-Euless Road location. The monument sign has not
been constructed.
Had the signs not been removed, the new occupant would have been permitted to simply reface the
existing signs. However, since the signs were completely removed, the regulations require that any
replacement signs comply.
. Page 1
- «~"-~-~~--".._-~-~-----_.~------,~
BankofAmerica ~
~
Corporate Real Estate
TX2-S01-11-01
PO Box 831000
Dallas, TX 75283-1000
Tel 214.948.2291
Fax 214.948.2272
October 1, 1999
Mr. Steve Norwood
Assistant City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
North Richland Hills, Tx 76180
Subject: Agenda Item for the October 11, 1999, North Richland Hills City Council Meeting
regarding Reinstallation of Bank of America Banking Centers' Pole Signage
Dear Mr. Norwood:
In the second quarter of 1999 two national banks merged, NationsBank and Bank of America. The
two facilities, one at 6100 Rufe Snow Drive, fonnerly NationsBank, and the other at 8625 Bedford-
Euless Road, fonnerly Bank of America, became the same company. No type of change in business,
employees or customer base occurred. When the sign company applied for a sign pennit it was
construed to be a new business and the new parameters were applied requiring the pole signs to be
removed, thus causing the inability of various customers to locate our facilities.
At the Rufe Snow Banking Center we understand that the street will be widened and the location of
the replaced pole sign would be on a parking island well within our property line yet visible to the
drivers that are searching for that banking center. At the Bedford Euless Road Banking Center the
pole sign would be reinstalled in the same location at the back of the property in that it can be seen
from multiple streets.
It will be greatly appreciated by Bank of America and the multitude of customers in North Richland
Hills to have the previous pole signs reinstalled in order to aid in the convenient location of these
facilities.
~ectfullY,
~' '.
\, '\
'-
----¡>hillip J. P ter
Vice President-Corporate Real Estate
cc Barbara Skarshaug-Region Executive
Kelly Smith-Banking Center Manager
Karen MacPherson-Banking Center Manager
J
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Police Department
Council Meeting Date: January 10, 2000
Subject: Appointment of Advisory Board for Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Agenda Number: GN 2000-01
Resolution #2000-03
On June 28, 1999, the City Council approved the City's Local Law Enforcement Block
Grant application for the partial funding of two vehicles for the School Resource Officers in
the Administrative Services Division of the Police Department. The grant application has
been submitted, and is in the approval process in the amount of $38,804. One of the
requirements of the grant is the establishment of a Local Law Enforcement Block Grant
Advisory Board. The Board reviews funding and makes non-binding recommendations
regarding the use of funds.
The Board must include a representative from several community organizations specified
by the United States Department of Justice. The organization and. corresponding
recommended representatives are as follows:
1. Local Police Department Tom Shockley Police Chief
2. Local Prosecutor's Office Mike McEntire Prosecuting Attorney
3. Local Court System Ray Oujesky Municipal Court Judge
4. Local School System Mike Fritz Director of Transportation BISD
5. Local Community Group Lisa Dier President, Citizens' Police Academy
Active in Crime Prevention Alumni Association
It is not anticipated that the Board will be active in the administration of the funding, as its
use is already specified under the original grant application.
Recommendation:
Approve Resolution 2000-03 establishing the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant
Advisory Board for the City of North Richland Hills.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
CXhfI ~
Department Head Signature
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Budget Director
~~~
City Manager Signature
Page 1 of ..1..
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-03
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills recently applied for a grant from
the United States Department of Justice to receive Local Law Enforcement Block
Grant Funds for FY 1999-2000; and
WHEREAS, The United States Department of Justice requires the City
Council to appoint a Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Advisory Board to review
programmatic funding and make non-binding recommendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, THAT the following individuals are hereby
appointed to the Advisory Board:
1. Tom Shockley
2. Mike McEntire
3. Ray Oujesky
4. Mike Fritz
5. Lisa Dier
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 10th day of January, 2000.
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Administration
Council Meeting Date: 01/10/00
Subject: Resolution affirminQ support for neutral tax treatment of
Internet purchases - Resolution No. 2000-02
In October 1998, the Internet Tax Freedom Act was signed into law imposing a 3 year
moratorium on new state and local taxes for online transactions and sales. This law also
created the Advisory Commission on E-Commerce to study and recommend appropriate
policy for international, federal, state and local taxes on Internet and comparable
international sales activities. This law has been the source of much concern among state
and local officials because of the long-term impact the emerging electronic marketplace
could have on local revenue bases.
Agenda Number: GN 2000-02
The E-commerce Commission has had several meetings and has been accepting
proposals regarding the Internet sales tax issue. The Commission is to issue a report to
Congress by April 21, 2000 with recommendations that promote tax and technology
neutrality among all forms of remote transactions. To this end, the National League of
Cities (NLC) along with several other associations of state and local officials has submitted
a proposal titled "Streamlined Sales Tax System for the 21st Century". This proposal
promotes the neutral tax treatment of Internet purchases through the creation of a unified,
zero burden system of collecting sales and use taxes from remote retail sellers. The
Commission will meet for the final time in Dallas on March 20-21, 2000.
Forrester Research projects that Internet sales will jump from $13 billion in 1998 to $108
billion by 2003, which is 6% of all U.S. retail spending. Although the booming economy
over the last several years has resulted in an increase in sales at both online and offline
stores, it is expected that the projected rapid increase in Internet sales over the next few
years will be to the detriment of "bricks and mortar" stores. This trend will also begin to
affect local and state sales tax revenues, especially if Internet purchases are free of sales
tax. Take for example a 6% decrease in total sales tax revenue to our City. This would
result in a loss of an estimated $1,009,341 per year, which is almost equal to the total
amount of the budget for the Planning and Inspections Department, and is just under the
total budget for the NRH Library. Currently, sales tax revenues account for 32% or
approximately one third of the General Fund. The Crime Control District and Park
Development fund revenues are wholly dependent on sales tax dollars. Based on these
conservative estimates, tax-free Internet sales would have a significant impact on
revenues to the General Fund and would be detrimental to the CCD and Park
Development Fund.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Account Number
Su~ient Funds Av~l~ble ~
/t:4¿Lk/>-JJ1-z¿ - ~
. Finance Director
~~~
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
In order to maintain the current service level and make up for a 6% loss in sales tax
revenue, the property tax rate would need to be increased by approximately $0.05 taking
the rate from $0.57 to $0.63 per $100 assessed valuation. Even a 2% loss in sales tax
revenue would result in a loss of approximately $336,447 in total sales tax revenue, which
translates into an additional $0.02 on the property tax rate to maintain the current service
level. Keep in mind that these numbers do not include inflation and they do not factor in
any increased operating costs, so the impact could be greater than anticipated.
Staff believes it to be in the best interest of the City of North Richland Hills to support
efforts to insure a level playing field for businesses and citizens in the new electronic
marketplace in order to protect local economies as well as state and local revenue
systems, and to insure that everyone benefits from the emergence of e-commerce. To this
end, the attached resolution affirms the City's support for neutral tax treatment of Internet
purchases, and affirms support of the "Streamlined Sales Tax System for the 21st Century"
proposed jointly by the NlC and several other associations of state and local officials.
Recommendation
Approve Resolution No. 2000-02 affirming support for neutral tax treatment of Internet
purchases and supporting the "Streamlined Sales Tax System for the 21st Century"
submitted on behalf of state, regional and local governments.
r
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 2 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02
RESOLUTION AFFIRMING SUPPORT FOR NEUTRAL TAX TREATMENT OF
INTERNET PURCHASES
WHEREAS, state and local governments rely on sales tax revenues to pay for
public services related to public safety, education, infrastructure maintenance, social
programs and other quality of life services; and,
WHEREAS, sales tax comprises nearly half of the revenues collected by states
and distributed by local governments; and,
WHEREAS, state and local governments have experienced difficulty in collecting
sales tax on purchases made from out-of-state businesses, known as remote sellers;
and,
WHEREAS, the growth of the Internet has increased the ease with which
consumers can engage in remote sales; and,
WHEREAS, Forrester Research projects that Internet sales will jump from $13
billion in 1998 to $108 billion in 2003, which is 6% of all retail spending; and,
WHEREAS, this migration of sales and resulting erosion of sales and use tax
revenues is restricting the ability of state and local governments and school districts to
collect taxes which finance essential public services; and,
WHEREAS, the United States Congress enacted the Internet Tax Freedom Act
of 1998 which pre-empts state and local authority by establishing a moratorium on the
imposition of E-commerce related taxation, and created an Advisory Commission on
Electronic Commerce charged with making recommendations for future Congressional
action; and,
WHEREAS, the Internet Tax Freedom Act discriminates against citizens without
Internet access because these individuals will continue to be obligated to pay sales tax
on purchases from local stores, while consumers with the means to afford the
necessary technology for making Internet purchases will not be required to pay sales
tax; and,
WHEREAS, retailers engaging in E-commerce will experience unfair competitive
advantage over local "Main Street", or "bricks and mortar" businesses if the Internet Tax
Freedom Act is made permanent; and,
1
WHEREAS, 99 percent of the goods and services purchased over the Internet
are bought using credit cards and other electronic payment mechanisms which offers
opportunities to collect existing taxes in non-discriminatory and efficient ways; and,
WHEREAS, the National Governor's Association estimates that state and local
sales tax could decrease by as much as 20% by 2003 if the Internet Tax Freedom Act is
made permanent; and,
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills is a member of the National League
of Cities, and the National League of Cities is launching a multi-year education and
advocacy effort to increase education and understanding of the electronic marketplace
and develop policy recommendations that will help shape the debate at the end of the
three-year moratorium on taxing online transactions; and,
WHEREAS, there are three key messages guiding this campaign:
· State and local leaders strongly support technology advances and the
opportunities offered by electronic commerce. At the same time, we
must protect local retailers from unfair competition and to preserve tax
bases needed to deliver basic and expected government services.
· Charaina sales tax for online purchases of traditional aoods does not
represent new taxes. A book purchased off a shelf and a book
purchase online are and should be subject to the same taxes.
· Convenience, not tax avoidance. is what lures consumers to online
purchasina. Therefore, it is safe to assume that charging sales tax for
traditional purchases will not stymie the growth of this new
marketplace. Moreover, it is absolutely clear that state and local sales
taxes have in no way restricted the phenomenal growth of the leading
e-commerce companies. Federal legislation should not create a
protected class of taxpayers at the expense of Main Street businesses
and other taxpayers; and,
WHEREAS, it is important that cities make their concerns known to our U. S.
Senators and Congressmen, state legislators, Governor and Lieutenant Governor; and,
WHEREAS, the advisory commission on Electronic Commerce will consider
proposals to address E-commerce related taxation issues, including one jointly
submitted by the National Governors' Association, Council of State Governments,
National Conference of State Legislators, National Association of Counties, US
Conference of Mayors, National League of Cities, and the International City/County
Manager's Association entitled "Streamlined Sales Tax System for the 21st Century";
2
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas that:
1. The City of North Richland Hills does hereby support the reasonable
application of sales tax on applicable products and services purchased
through electronic commerce, to ensure equitable treatment of retailers
physically located in North Richland Hills and preservation of the local tax
base needed to deliver basic and expected government services.
2. The City of North Richland Hills hereby opposes attempts by the United
States Congress to enact further legislation that might pre-empt the authority
of state and local governments, and
3. The City of North Richland Hills hereby supports the "Streamlined Sales Tax
System for the 21st Century" submitted on behalf of states, regional and local
government officials, and
4. The City will participate in educational and advocacy efforts as outlined by the
National League of Cities and will communicate with state and local officials
regarding this important issue.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day of January, 2000.
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma - Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson - City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
Rex McEntire - Attorney for the City
3
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Adm inistration
Council Meeting Date: 01/10/00
Subject: Resolution authorizinQ participation in GUD No. 8976. Agenda Number: GN 2000-03
TXU Lone Star Pipeline's application to the Railroad Commission to Increase
its city gate rate further authorizing participation with the Steering Committee
of Cities Served by Lone Star in proceedings before the Railroad Commission
and subsequent appeals - Resolution No. 2000-01
On October 29, 1999 TXU Lone Star Pipeline filed a request with the Texas Railroad
Commission to increase rates by $20+ million (16% increase) which would raise the
average monthly bill between $0.60 and $0.90 for each residential customer (GUD No.
8976). Lone Star sought a similar increase in 1997, however, the Railroad Commission
eventually ordered a rate reduction.
As a result, the Steering Committee of Lone Star Gas Service Area Cities met and urged
its members to intervene in GUD No. 8976 since their efforts were successful in preventing
such a rate increase in 1997. The Steering Committee currently consists of 36 cities
including Dallas, Fort Worth, Arlington, Irving, Grand Prairie, Lewisville, and Piano in our
region.
',--
In order to work effectively against this rate increase, staff believes it is beneficial and
necessary to intervene in GUD No. 8976 and to participate with the Steering Committee in
its efforts to prevent this increase. To this end, the attached resolution authorizes the City
of North Richland Hills to intervene in the rate increase proceedings before the Railroad
Commission and to participate with the Steering Committee to assure fair and reasonable
gas rates.
Recommendation
Approve Resolution No. 2000-01 authorizing the City to intervene in GUD No. 8976 before
the Railroad Commission, and authorizing the City to participate in the Steering Committee
of Cities Served by Lone Star in the proceedings before the Railroad Commission and any
subsequent appeals.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Finance Director
""--
Ii A ¡/¡~cl/tÞ-¿1'l7F;;---
. Department Head Signature
~c:~
City ager Signature
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-01
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION IN GUD NO. 8976, TXU LONE
STAR PIPELINE'S APPLICATION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION TO
INCREASE ITS CITY GATE RATE; FURTHER AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION
WITH THE STEERING COMMITTEE OF CITIES SERVED BY LONE STAR IN
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE RAILROAD COMMISSION OR SUBSEQUENT
APPEALS; REQUIRING RATE CASE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT FOR
REASONABLE COSTS INCURRED BY THE STEERING COMMITTEE FOR
ATTORNEYS, CONSULTANTS AND WITNESSES AND OTHER ASSOCIATED
COSTS
WHEREAS the City of North Richland Hills pursuant to GURA §103.23 has
standing in each case before the Railroad Commission that relates to a gas utility's
rates and services in the municipality; and,
WHEREAS on October 29, 1999 TXU Lone Star Pipeline filed a proceeding with
the Railroad Commission (GUD No. 8976) to increase its city gate rate revenues by
$20.4 million; and,
WHEREAS the City and its residents may be adversely impacted by increases in
the city gate rate; and,
WHEREAS the City is entitled pursuant to §103.22 to reimbursement of its
reasonable costs associated with participation in ratemaking proceedings; and,
WHEREAS the Steering Committee of Cities Served by Lone Star is a standing
committee with representatives from numerous cities that are experienced in employing,
directing and coordinating efforts of lawyers, consultants and expert witnesses on behalf
of cities in regulatory proceedings;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS THAT:
1. The City of North Richland Hills is authorized to intervene in Railroad
Commission GUD No. 8976.
2. The City of North Richland Hills will participate with other cities in GUD No.
8976 and in any subsequent appeals of the administrative proceeding through
involvement with the Steering Committee of Cities Served by Lone Star. The
Steering Committee is authorized to retain attorneys, consultants and expert
witnesses that may be necessary to protect the interests of cities and their
residents.
3. Lone Star shall promptly reimburse reasonable costs incurred by the Steering
Committee of Cities Served by Lone Star for efforts undertaken under GUD
No. 8976.
4. A copy of this resolution shall be sent to Jay Doegey, City Attorney of
Arlington and Chairman of the Steering Committee of Cities Served by Lone
Star, 200 W. Abram Drive, Arlington, Texas 76010; fax no. 817-459-6897.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day of January, 2000.
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma - Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson - City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
Rex McEntire - Attorney for the City
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Public Works Department
Council Meeting Date: 1/10/00
Subject: Award of Bid on Watauaa Road Booster Pump Station Agenda Number: PW 2000-04
1999 Improvements to Midstate Construction Services, Inc. in the
Amount of $201,225.10
Bids were received on this project on December 22, 1999. A total of 11 bids was received.
The bids were received in two parts. The first set of bids is for the construction of the
miscellaneous improvements and the installation of the pumps and motors. We received 8
of these bids. The second set of bids is from the pump supply companies who will be
providing the pumps and motors to the contractor for installation. We received 3 of these
bids. With the bids combined appropriately, the total project bids range from $201,225 to
$253,435.
Bidder
Midstate Construction Services, Inc.
North Texas Municipal Construction
Co.,lnc.
S stems Inte ration, Inc.
Amount Bid
$162,790.00
$185,000.00
$189,806.00
Calendar Da s Bid
150
200
100
Amount Bid
$38,435.10
$59,237.20
$51,810.00
Delivery Time
Calendar Da s
70
70
90
When the low pump bid from PACO Pumps is added to the three contractor's low bids, the
total amounts bid are as shown below:
Bidder
Midstate Construction Services, Inc.
North Texas Municipal Construction
Co., Inc.
S stems Inte ration, Inc.
Amount Bid
$201,225.10
$223,435.10
$228,241.10
Calendar Da s Bid
150
200
100
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
~
Finance Review
Account Number405-0000-712.79-00/02-90-12-6000
Su(ficient t~s~~a~
~~~"œDI_
/CÛ~
City Manager Signature
'-
Page 1 of L
~I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
This project will consist of three pumps and motors being replaced, some piping work, and
SCADA improvements. After this work is complete and the City of Fort Worth finishes
replacement of the 10-inch meter with a 16-inch meter, the station will increase its capacity
from 8 MGD to 12 MGD.
The following is an estimated schedule of construction.
Award of Bid
Preconstruction Conference
Begin Construction
End Construction
January 10, 2000
January 24, 2000
February 2, 2000
July 1, 2000
The current construction budget for this project is $450,000. The budget was approved by
Council with the 1999/2000 Capital Projects Budget.
By contract, Watauga is obligated to pay one-half of the cost for this project. They have
reviewed the bids and are in favor of awarding the project to the low bidder.
Recommendation: To award the bid to Midstate Construction Services, Inc. in the amount
of $201,225.10 for a period of 150 calendar days with pumps and motors being supplied
by PACO Pumps.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page --Lof .2
UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Watauga Road Booster Pump Station
Watauga Road West of Highway 377
i
/:
I
Ii
II
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project will consist of upgrading the Watauga Booster Pump Station in two separate phases
The first phase will consist of replacing three (3) existing pumps and a flow meter. This will increase
the pumping capacity at the pump station from 8 MGD to 10 MGD. The second phase consists of
upgrading the pump station from 10 MGD to 12 MGD.
PROJECT STATUS Beginning Ending
Ilm Ilm
Engineering 4/99 1 0/99
Construction 11/99 6/00
FINANCIAL DATA
Total
Funding Source Amount to 1999/2000 2000/2001 Remaining Project
Date Budget Budget Budget Cost
City of Watauga $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Impact Fees 250,000 0 0 0 250,000
Total $500,000 SO $0 $0 $500,000
Project Expenditures
Engineering $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Construction 450,000 0 0 0 450,000
Total $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
IMPACT ON OPERATING BUDGET
No operating costs are anticipated for this project.
Projected Annual
Operating Impact
134
·
KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
January 3,2000
Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E.
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: 3-582, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
WATAUGA ROAD BOOSTER PUMP STATION IMPROVEMENTS
TABULATION OF BIDS AND RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD
Bids were received on Wednesday, December 22, 1999 from eleven (11) contractors for the above
referenced project. Eight ofthese were bid as general contractors and three a~ pump suppliers.
The pump bids are evaluated separately ba~ed on the value of the pump efficiency as well as price
bid. The pump supplier that submitted the bid that is rated to be the best value is prcposed to be
awarded the contract for supplying the pump units through the general contractor. Th::: City will
then contract only with the general contractor.
The bid tabulation which follows contains the pump unit evaluation bid, the effective contTact price
and the general contractor's bids. The three lowest bids are included for your mformatiun.
Pump Bids for Evaluation Only:
Bid for Adjustment Adjusted
Pump Supplier Three Pumps For Efficiency Cost
PACe Pumps $34,941.00 $2,640.00 $37,581.00
Jersey Equipment Co. $53,852.00 $352.00 $54,204.00
Peerless/Phoenix Pump $47,100.00 $17,952.00 $65,052.00
Pump Bids for Project Cost:
Bid for 10% Install Total Cost
Pump Supplier Three Pumps To Contractor To City
PACe Pumps $34,941.00 $3,494.10 $38,435.10
Jersey Equipment Co. $53,852.00 $5,385.20 $59,237.20
Peerless/Phoenix Pump $47,100.00 $4,710.00 $51,810.00
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550· BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021-5826· 817/283-6211· METRO 817/267-3367· FAX 817/354-4389
Watauga Road Booster Pump Station Improvements - January 3, 2000 - Page 2 of 2
General Contractor Bids:
Three Lowest Bidders
Calendar Total Total Total
Contractor Bid Days Amount Bid Pump Bid Cost
Midstate Construction Services, Inc. 150 $162,790.00 $38,435.10 $201,225.10
North TX Municipal Canst. Co., Inc. 200 $185,000.00 $38,435.10 $223,435.10
Systems Integration, Inc. 100 $189,806.00 $38,435.10 $228,241 .10
The lowest bid for the Pumping Units (Pumps & Motors complete) was from PACO Pumps.
Considering the Pump Unit Efficiency, the PACO bid continues to be the lowest of the three.
The lowest bid for the general construction portion of the Project was submitted by Midstate
Construction Services, Inc. of East Syracuse, New York.
The low bidder, Midstate Construction Services, Inc has submitted several items of qualification
prior to the award by the Council as required. They have also included a letter addressed to the
City which expresses their desire to enter into the Texas construction market. These documents
submitted by Midstate are attached for your infonnation.
Even though we have not had the opportunity to work with this contractor in the past and have not
had the opportunity to follow-up on their references, they appear to have more than sufficient
qualifications to complete this project. Approximately one-half of this project is made up of
electrical components and installation. Mr. Ron Burlin, President of Midstate Construction
Services has infonned me that it is their desire and intent to use a local contractor, WHECO
Electric, to perfonn this portion. We would, therefore recommend award to them in the amount of
$201,225.10 which includes furnishing and installing the pumping units from PACO Pumps.
A copy of the Tabulation of Bids is attached for your infonnation.
We will be available at the January 10th Council meeting to assist you with answers to any
questions which the Council might have concerning this Project.
~i~/~4~9
Xc: Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., C.F.M., Assistant Public Works DirectorlUtilities
Mr. Johnny Reagan, City ofWatauga, Public Works & Parks Director
Mr. Ronald Burlin, President, Midstate Construction Services
12/30/1333 05: 14
3154330Ø15
t·1 I [1ST A TEOJt ISTRS\ICE
PAGE 14
MIDSTA TE
CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
INCOHPORA ¡ED
December 30, 1999
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North RichlAnd Hills, Texas 76180
Attn:
Gregory W. Dickens, P.E.
Director of Public Works
watauba Road Booster Pump Station Improvements
Re:
Dear Mr. Dickens,
We have been notified by Mr. Philipp of Knowlton--English-Flowers, Inc tllat we
are the apparent low bidder on the above named project. We are obviously not a
local company and Mr. Philipp adviserf that it would be helpful to the award
process to le~rn more about our intentions as they relate to servicing this project.
I had previously spent 10 years working in the Texas construction mArketplace. I
recently was drawn to the Dallas area by invitation of another customer and
began pursuing work in the Dalla~ area as a result. We are continuing to pursue
other work in the Dallas area and hope to be there for a lonq tìme_
Additionally, I would like to point out that we have servic~d other customfilrs in
Maine, Connecticut, MassachlJsetts. Vermont ami New Hamp!;hire for the past
several years_' While those states are closer thAn T~xas they Are not
commutable on a daily basis and we have hAnrfled those projects successfully
We are confident we can provide you quality service on this project.
I
Please let me ~now if you need additional information We are looking forward to
working with you soon.
Very truly yours,
\\U~ 7\-.
Ronald E. Burfin.
President I'
I
6600 JOY RD. , EA~T SYRAGUSE, NY 1305ì , Pf-fONE (315) 13,'1-2ì01 , FAX (315) 433-0016