HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 2000-04-24 AgendasCITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE - COUNCIL AGENDA
APRIL 24, 2000 — 5:30 PM
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills - Library Board Room 6720 Northeast
Loop 820 and City Hall, Pre Council Room, 7301 Northeast Loop 820
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1.
Call Meeting to Order (Library Board Room)
2. IR 2000 -050
Library Computer Demonstration (25 Minutes)
Return
to City Hall - Pre Council Room 7301 Northeast
Loop 820
3.
Discuss Items from Regular April 24, 2000 City
Council Meeting (5 Minutes)
4. IR 2000 -051
Rufe Snow Drive -Sign Relocation (10 Minutes)
5.
*Executive Session — The Council may Enter into
Closed Executive Session to discuss the
Following: Personnel as authorized by Section
§551.074 of the Government Code
- Review of Council Appointed Positions
(10 Minutes)
6.
Adjournment — 6:50 pm
*Closed due to subject matter as provide by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated,
it will be taken in open session
Ode
71me
City Se-cretavv
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
APRIL 24, 2000 — 7:00 PM
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 7301 Northeast
Loop 820, at 7:00 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and /or
action.
1. Items on the consent agenda will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for
separate discussion.
2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items
listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open
Meetings Act.
3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should
contact the City Secretary's office at 427 -6060 two working days prior to the meeting so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1.
Call to Order
2.
Invocation —
3.
Pledge of Allegiance
4.
Special Presentations
5.
Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda
0.06)
Dab
TIM
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
6.
Consent Agenda Item(s)
a. Minutes of the Pre - Council Meeting
April 10, 2000
b. Minutes of the Council Meeting April 10,
2000
PW 2000 -12
C. Award of Bid for the 25th year CDBG
Project/Maryanna Way and Nancy Lane
to Stabile & Winn, Inc. in the amount of
$220,702.55
PW 2000 -13
d. Approve Interlocal Agreement with
Tarrant County for the Maintenance of
North Tarrant Parkway - Resolution No.
2000 -027
Request of Welch Engineering (U.S.
7. PS 2000 -12
Restaurant Properties) for a Final Plat of Lot 1,
Block 1, Vista Addition. (Property Located at
the Southeast Corner of Davis Boulevard and
Precinct Line Road at 8612 Davis Boulevard
Public Hearing to Consider the Request of
8. LRC 2000 -04
Tina Harvey for Variances to the Landscape
Regulations, Ordinance No. 2423 on Lots 1 -8,
Block D, Smithfield Addition. (Property
Located at 8021 Main Street
Public Hearing to Consider Amending
9. GN 2000 -41
Ordinance No. 2423, Landscape Regulations
Relative to Landscaping Requirements for
Non - Residential Uses in Residential Districts -
Ordinance No. 2473
Public Hearing to Consider Amending Sign
10. G 2000 -42
Regulations, Ordinance No. 2374 Relative to
Light Pole Banners - Ordinance No. 2474 and
Consider Amending Development Fee
Ordinance No. 2451 to Establish a Light Pole
Banner Sign Fee - Ordinance No. 2475
11. G 2000 -39
Support H.R. 1876 to Amend the Clean Air Act
- Resolution No. 2000 -28
12. GN 2000 -40
Encourage Congressional Review of the
Transportation Equity Act of the 21 st Century
(TEA -21) Rate of Funding Return for the State
of Texas - Resolution No. 2000 -29
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
13.
14.
a) Citizens Presentation
b Information and Reports
115.
Adjournment
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No.1 00 -050 _
Date: April 24, 2000
Subject: Update on Library Automation
The City Council will participate in a brief demonstration of the capabilities of the new
Innovative Interfaces Library Automation System, including our Self-Checkout service, at the
Library on April 24. This Informal Report is a status report on progress to date in the
implementation of library automation.
Installation and training on the new Innovative Interfaces Millennium library system began
in May of last year. Since that time, much has been accomplished:
• All new library materials have been cataloged using the system since May 1999.
• The library collection has been labeled with new barcodes.
• Beginning in August, new library cards have been issued to library users.
• A customized interface to the electronic catalog was developed and tested, and
has proved to be very easy -to -use for library patrons.
• An automated Telephone Notification System has been installed, calling to notify
patrons of overdue materials or reserved items being held for them.
• Self -Check equipment was installed on March 20.
On August 11 the system was introduced to the public, and all loans of materials have been
managed on the new system since that time. So far in April the Library is averaging loans
of nearly 1,500 per day.
Transition from the old MUNIS system to the new innovative system has generally been
smooth. In order to keep track of the thousands of books checked out on the old system, the
MUNIS system was operated in parallel, and for the first three months all returned materials
were checked in on both systems.
In the nine months since introducing the Innovative system to the public, we have
experienced no down time, and only one brief period of slow operation.
Of the system components that we originally contracted to purchase, the Public Access
Catalog, Cataloging, Circulation, and Serials Control modules are operational.
The Acquisitions (purchasing) module was postponed until the release of the Java -based
Millennium version of the software. The new version is now available and we are expecting
to upgrade shortly.
There are several projects remaining in this implementation:
• Implementing the Acquisition module, including electronic ordering;
• Adding a CD -ROM server to the system and integrating our electronic database
subscriptions;
• Improving the system's web management capabilities;
• Building additional links to other libraries in the region;
• Creating a community information database to add to the catalog;
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
• Adding an imaging interface to the catalog and incorporating historic
photographic images.
The Library has received a small grant of $2,000 from the North Texas Regional Library
System that will provide 60% of the purchase costs of the imaging interface software. We
anticipate that the first group of digital images will be ready to introduce to the public by the
end of the summer.
The original amount budgeted for the Library Automation project was $330,000. It now
appears that when all final costs are in that the project will be approximately $20,000 under
budget.
Respectfully submitted,
Z� le.
Steve Brown
Library Director
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 00 -051
Date: April 24, 2000
Subject: Rufe Snow Drive; Sign Relocations
The City and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) are currently acquiring right -of-
way along Rufe Snow Drive for the Rufe Snow Drive Widening Project. Some of the right -of-
way the City and TxDOT need impacts five business signs. Section 10 of the Sign Regulation
Ordinance outlines how nonconforming signs are to be handled. Paragraph C. of Section 10
specifies that the property owner has five years to either remove or rebuild their signs to
conform with the Sign Ordinance after relocation due to the widening project. The five affected
signs are shown below.
1.
Don Pablo's Restaurant
(TxDOT to acquire ROW)
2.
Applebee's Restaurant
(TxDOT to acquire ROW)
3.
Chick -Fil -A
(City to acquire ROW)
4.
Hilltop Square
(City to acquire ROW)
5.
Carlson Office Park
(City to acquire ROW)
(Industrial Park Blvd./Rufe
Snow Dr.)
It would not be necessary to relocate signs 3, 4, and 5 if this was a City project. The City has
allowed right -of -way encroachments in the past as long as the encroachment did not present a
danger. These three signs are set back far enough from the proposed pavement edge to not
present a risk to the motorist. However, since we are required to follow federal guidelines
(which will not allow sign encroachment into public right -of -way), the signs will need to be
moved. Staff is currently investigating if there are any exceptions to the federal guidelines.
TxDOT agreed to purchase the necessary right -of -way at the intersection of Loop 820 and Rufe
Snow Drive. Two of the right -of -way parcels that TxDOT agreed to acquire impact the Don
Pablo's sign and the Applebee's sign. During a telephone conversation TxDOT indicated their
intention was to relocate the existing signs and not rebuild. TxDOT said the City would be
responsible for any additional cost due to the signs needing to conform to the City's ordinance.
It was also implied that TxDOT might require the City to acquire the right -of -way for these two
parcels. TxDOT does not want to spend highway funds to bring nonconforming signs into
compliance.
The Sign Ordinance allows property owners with nonconforming signs to keep their existing
signs as long as the ownership of the -property does not change. When the property with the
nonconforming sign is sold, the sign (at that time) will need to be rebuilt to conform with the Sign
Ordinance.
Because of the circumstances mentioned above, staff feels the five signs could be relocated
(same sign, just moved) and be allowed to remain until the ownership of the property changes.
Staff is requesting direction from Council concerning this issue.
'Rnesspectfully submitted,
v l � Ct-
Mike Curtis, P.E.
Assistant Public Works Director
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
MINUTES OF THE PRE - COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE
PRE - COUNCIL ROOM AT CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 — APRIL 10, 2000 — 5:30 P.M.
Present: Charles Scoma
JoAnn Johnson
Lyle E. Welch
Russell Mitchell
Frank Metts, Jr.
Don Phifer
Matt Milano, Ph.D.
T. Oscar Trevino, Jr.
Larry J. Cunningham
Randy Shiflet
Steve Norwood
Greg Vick
Patricia Hutson
Alicia Richardson
Rex McEntire
Greg Dickens
Marcy Ratcliff
Larry Koonce
Jim Browne
Terry Kinzie
Tom Shockley
Andy Jones
Bill Thornton
Paulette Hartman
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Managing Director Community Services
City Secretary
Assistant City Secretary
Attorney
Public Works Director
Zoning Administrator
Finance Director
Park and Recreation Director
Information Services Director
Police Chief
Fire Chief
Assistant Parks Director
Assistant to the City Manager
ITEM
DISCUSSION
ASSIGNMENT
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order at 5:30
p.m.
DISCUSS ITEMS
Agenda Items 9 & 10 — PZ 2000 -08 & PZ 2000 -11 —
FROM REGULAR
Councilman Milano questioned whether Council
APRIL 10, 2000
would still be able to address elevations on PZ 2000 -
CITY COUNCIL
11 if the site plan was approved under PZ 2000 -08.
MEETING
Staff advised that approving the site plan would not
conflict with the variance and that the elevations
could be addressed during the variance.
-
The City Manager introduced to the Council Mr. John
Pitstick, the City's new Director of Development.
Pre - Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 2
- ITEM
DISCUSSION
ASSIGNMENT
IR 2000 -047
The consensus of the City Council was to schedule
PATRICIA /LARRY C.
Follow -up as
DISCUSS
the annual goals setting workshop for April 28 and
POSSIBLE DATES
29, 2000.
necessary.
FOR ANNUAL
GOALS
WORKSHOP
IR 2000 -043 SET
The consensus of the Council was to hold a work
RANDY /PATRICIA/
DATE FOR WORK
session on May 15 at 5:00 p.m. for the purpose of
TOM /LARRY C.
SESSION ON
planning and preparing for the referendum on the
Follow -up as
CRIME CONTROL
Crime Control District.
necessary.
DISTRICT
PLANNING
IR 2000 -044
Mayor Scoma discussed with the Council the
RANDY
DISCUSS
possibility of conducting Town Hall meetings or work
Follow -up & Report
POSSIBLE NORTH
shop seminars for the citizens interested in
back to Council.
RICHLAND HILLS
becoming involved in city government. This would
LEADERSHIP
provide citizens with an opportunity to learn about
SFMINAR (MAYOR
the various boards and commissions and
responsibilities of the City Council. It was suggested
that this would also be a good opportunity to inform
citizens of the time frame involved as projects move
through the City. It was also suggested that a table
or display be set up for each board. The consensus
of the Council was that such a seminar would be
beneficial and to proceed with developing a
leadership seminar for citizens interested in serving
in different public capacities.
IR 2000 -045
Mr. Tom Galbreath, Dunaway Associates, briefed
GREG D. /MARCY R.
DISCUSS THE
the Council on their need for Shady Grove Road to
FYI
REQUEST TO
be abandoned between Davis Boulevard and
ABANDON A
Precinct Line Road. Mr. Galbreath requested
PORTION OF
Council input on any issues or concerns they might
SHADY GROVE
have in abandoning Shady Grove Road. Some
ROAD BETWEEN
Council Members expressed opposition and concern
DAVIS
with a Wal Mart being located on the property while
BOULEVARD AND
there are abandoned shell and vacant buildings
PRECINCT LINE
located throughout the City. There was also concern
ROAD
about how the traffic flow would be affected if Shady
Grove were abandoned. It was discussed that
Shady Grove Road provides relief from the
congestion of North Tarrant and Davis Boulevard.
There was also discussion on the need to keep in
mind that this area is the northern gateway to the
City and the Council should consider this as
Pre - Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 3
ITEM
DISCUSSION
ASSIGNMENT
development plans for the area are considered.
Some Council members indicated that they would
support the abandonment of the road, but that the
traffic concerns should be addressed and the
developer would need to work with the citizens in the
surrounding neighborhood.
I 2000 -048
The City Manager briefly reviewed the status of the
REVIEW STATUS
goals for 1998 and 1999. The Council was advised
OF 1998 & 1999
that the goals set in June 1998 were complete and
COUNCIL GOALS
that 75% of the goals set in June 1999 were
complete. There were no questions from the
Council.
IR 2000 -039
Staff advised of the proposed language for the
MARCY
REVIEW AND
amendments to the Sign Ordinance to allow light
Follow -up & return to
DISCUSS
pole banners. The proposed amendment would
City Council for
POSSIBLE
allow light pole banners with a permit for a period not
consideration.
AMENDMENTS TO
to exceed 60 days, three permits per year would be
T9E SIGN
allowed per property, the banners may not exceed
. ., GULATION
32 square feet in area or extend above the maximum
ORDINANCE NO.
height of the light pole, and the banners may only be
2374 RELATIVE TO
seasonal in nature and not directly advertise a
LIGHT POLE
business or sales event. The Council was in
BANNERS
agreement with the proposed language and the
consensus of the Council was to place the proposed
amendment on a Council agenda for action.
I 2000 -040
Staff explained that currently when institutional uses
MARCY
REVIEW AND
develop in single - family districts, they are not subject
Follow -up & return to
DISCUSS
to landscaping requirements. The proposed
City Council for
POSSIBLE
amendment will exempt only single family uses from
consideration.
AMENDMENTS TO
the landscaping requirements and will require
THE
institutional uses to be subject to the landscaping
LANDSCAPING
regulations. The consensus of the Council was to
REGULATIONS NO.
place the proposed amendment to the landscaping
2423 RELATIVE TO
regulations on a Council agenda for action.
APPLICABILITY TO
.NONRESIDENTIAL
USES IN
RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICTS
Pre - Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 4
ITEM
DISCUSSION
ASSIGNMENT
IR 2000 -041
Staff briefed the Council on a request from a
STEVE N.
DISCUSSION ON
prospective tenant planned for Richland Pointe Mall
Follow -up with
AMENDING TAX
for Council to consider personal property tax
Requestor.
ABATEMENT
abatements. After discussion, the consensus of the
ORDINANCE TO
Council was that they did not desire to consider
CONSIDER
personal property tax abatements.
PERSONAL
PROPERTY TAXES
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Scoma announced at 6:43 p.m. that the
meeting would adjourn to Executive Session for the
purpose of discussing personnel (review of Council
appointed positions) as authorized by Section
551.074 of the Local Government Code. The
Executive Session adjourned at 7:00 p.m. to the
regular Council meeting, with no action needed.
Charles Scoma — Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson — City Secretary
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 — APRIL 10, 2000 - 7:00 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order April 10, 2000 at 7:05 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Charles Scoma
JoAnn Johnson
Lyle E. Welch
Russell Mitchell
Frank Metts, Jr.
Don Phifer
Matt Milano
T. Oscar Trevino, Jr
Staff:
Larry J. Cunningham
Randy Shiflet
Steve Norwood
Greg Vick
Patricia Hutson
Alicia Richardson
Rex McEntire
Mayor Scoma gave the invocation.
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Managing Director of Community Services
City Secretary
Assistant City Secretary
Attorney
2.
INVOCATION
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
a.) PROCLAMATION - VOLUNTEER WEEK
Mayor Scoma Presented a proclamation to Ed Lesser, United Way, proclaiming April 9th
through the 15 h as National Volunteer Week.
b.) RECOGNITION OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS VOLUNTEER OF THE YEAR
City Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 2
Mayor Scoma presented a plaque to Mr. Tucker for being selected as North Richland
Hills Volunteer of the Year.
None.
• 5.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
6.
APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
APPROVED
A. MINUTES OF THE PRE - COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 27, 2000
B. MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 27, 2000
C. GN 2000- 36 - CERTIFICATION OF UNOPPOSED CANDIDATES AND
DECLARING UNOPPOSED CANDIDATES ELECTED TO OFFICE - ORDINANCE
NO. 2466
D. GN 2000 -37 - AUTHORIZE THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENT TO
ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION - RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -26
E. PU 2000 -23 - AWARD BID FOR VIDEO EQUIPMENT TO CMS /MCSI IN THE
AMOUNT OF $37,566
F. PU 2000 -24 -AUTHORIZE PARTICIPATION IN THE TARRANT COUNTY
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING PROGRAM FOR THE STREET WEDGE MILLING
PROJECT
G. PU 2000 -25 - AUTHORIZE PARTICIPATION IN STATE DEPARTMENT OF
INFORMATION RESOURCES COOPERATIVE PURCHASING PROGRAM FOR
NETWORK COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
H. PW 2000 -11 - BIG FOSSIL CREEK WATERSHED FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION
STUDY - RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -25
Mayor Pro Tern Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Trevino to approve the
consent agenda.
Motion to approve carried 7 -0.
City Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 3
7.
PZ 99 -36 - APPEAL PUBLIC HEARING TO RECONSIDER AMENDING ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 1874 TO ADD ARTICLE 12, NEIGHBORHOOD PARKLAND
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS — ORDINANCE NO. 2455 (DENIED AT THE
FEBRUARY 28 CITY COUNCIL MEETING)
APPROVED
Mr. Jim Browne, Director of Parks & Recreation, summarized PZ 99 -36.
Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing, asking for anyone wishing to speak in
opposition to come forward.
Mr. Doug Long, representing applicant, asked for clarification regarding the applicability
of the requirements for properties who have formally submitted a final plat.
Mayor Scoma asked for anyone wishing to speak for the item to come forward.
Mr. Dwayne Leslie, Parks & Recreation Board President, spoke in favor of the request.
Mr. Robert O'Reilly, 9001 Trails Edge, inquired about the capping.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing.
Councilman Trevino moved, seconded by Councilman Welch to approve PZ 99 -36,
Ordinance No. 2455.
Councilman Mitchell asked Councilman Trevino to amend his motion to include a flat
fee for Parks and Recreation dedication of $600.00 per lot for residential and $1,000
per acre for non - residential.
Councilman Trevino denied the amendment.
Council discussed options of acquiring parks.
Councilman Mitchell asked Councilman Trevino to amend his motion to include the
provision that there be a flat fee of $600.00 per lot/property or mixture thereof for
residential and $1,000.00 per acre /property for non - residential.
Councilman Trevino accepted and Councilman Welch seconded the amendment.
Motion to approve carried 5 -2; with Councilmen Welch, Mitchell, Phifer, Milano and
Trevino voting for and Mayor Pro Tern Johnson and Councilman Metts voting against.
City Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 4
8.
PZ 2000 -07 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF KPA
CONSULTING FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ON LOT 4R, BLOCK 4, BRENTWOOD
ESTATES TO ALLOW AN AUTOMOBILE LUBRICATION CENTER AND MINOR
AUTO REPAIR IN A C -1, COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. LOCATED AT 8401 DAVIS
BOULEVARD — ORDINANCE NO. 2470
DENIED
Ms. Kitina Gilstrap, applicant, summarized request.
Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city
codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and
Zoning Commission. Staff is requesting that Council approve this Special Use Permit to
be tied to America's Service Station - Minor Auto Repair.
Councilman Trevino asked why Staff changed their recommendation.
Mr. Norwood advised Council that a couple of issues concerned Staff. The first being
adjacency issues and future occupants of the building if and when America's Service
Station businesses is no longer operating out of this location. America's Service Station
is a high -end service station; they get cars in and out which will not create a problem of
parking customer vehicles over night. This may not be the case in 2 or 5 years when a
new business operates out of this facility. Staff felt the best solution to reduce that
possibility would be to tie the Special Use Permit directly to America's Service Station.
Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak on this
item to come forward.
The following came forward to speak:
Mr. Kirk Roberts, 8612 Shady Grove Drive - Against
Mr. Jack Oaks, 8608 Twisted Oaks - Against
Mr. Kevin Lecky, 8625 Caddo Court - Against
Ms. Lisa Young, 8629 Saddle Ridge - Against
Councilman Milano moved, seconded by Councilman Trevino to deny PZ 2000 -07,
Ordinance No. 2470.
Motion to deny carried 5 -2; with Councilmen Welch, Mitchell, Milano, Trevino and
Mayor Pro Tem Johnson voting for denial and Councilmen Metts and Phifer voting for
approval.
City Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 5
9.
PZ 2000 -08 - REQUEST OF GSBS BATENHORST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL OF
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 200 FEET OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BRENTWOOD ESTATES ADDITION. THE PROPERTY IS
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF SHADY GROVE ROAD
AND DAVIS BLVD.
APPROVED
Mr. Tom Batenhorst, applicant, summarized his request.
Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city
codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Johnson to approve
PZ 2000 -08.
Motion to approve carried 7 -0.
10.
PZ 2000 -11 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF GSBS
BATENHORST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW EXTERIOR MATERIALS
OTHER THAN MASONRY ON A PROPOSED BANK BUILDING ON PROPOSED LOT
1, BLOCK 1, BRENTWOOD ESTATES ADDITION. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED
AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAVIS BLVD & SHADY GROVE RD.
ORDINANCE NO. 2468
APPROVED
Mr. Batenhorst summarized request.
Councilman Mitchell asked Mr. Batenhorst if he would consider stone versus stucco.
Mr. Batenhorst advised Council since the stucco is 16 feet above the ground it requires
them to change the structural system to support the weight of the stone.
Councilman Mitchell asked Mr. Batenhorst if he would be willing to brick the columns in
the drive -thru.
Mr. Batenhorst said that would be a possibility.
Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city
codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
City Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 6
Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak on the
item to come forward.
Mr. Robert O'Reilly, 9001 Trails Edge, mentioned he was not necessarily against this
item, but wanted to know if this was a cost issue (masonry versus stone).
Mr. Steve Bruning, 8612 Kensington, not necessarily opposed. He inquired how this
building would blend with the stucco house behind the proposed building.
Ms. Lisa Young, 8629 Saddle Ridge Trail, is not in opposition of request. However, she
would like Council to set a precedent by upholding to the current ordinances.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing.
Councilman Milano moved, seconded by Councilman Trevino to deny PZ 2000 -11,
Ordinance No. 2468.
Councilman Mitchell asked Councilman Milano to change his motion to approve with
the stipulation of a minimum of 75% brick or stone exterior.
Councilman Milano did not accept amendment.
Motion to deny failed 3 -4; with Councilmen Mitchell, Milano and Trevino voting for
denial and Councilmen Welch, Metts, Phifer and Mayor Pro Tern Johnson voting
against denial.
Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Johnson to approve
PZ 2000 -11, Ordinance No. 2468.
Councilman Mitchell asked Councilman Metts to amend his motion to include the
stipulation that the developer put brick in the drive -thru columns - anything touching the
ground has to be brick.
Councilman Metts rejected the amendment.
Mayor Scoma clarified Councilman Mitchell's amendment - to brick the column areas in
the drive -thru section.
Mayor Scoma asked Mr. Batenhorst if the structure were made of brick would it be
more resistant to chipping and breaking by vehicle doors.
Mr. Batenhorst said that the brick would be a stronger product and he did not have a
problem revising the pillars to masonry up to the bottom side of the soffit.
City Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 7
Councilman Mitchell asked Councilman Metts to amend his motion to include the
stipulation that the developer brick the columns in the drive -thru area up to the soffit.
Councilman Metts accepted amendment. Mayor Pro Tern Johnson seconded the
amendment.
Motion to approve carried 5 -2; with Councilmen Welch, Mitchell, Metts, Phifer and
Mayor Pro Tern Johnson voting for and Councilmen Milano and Trevino voting agianst.
Mayor Scoma recessed the meeting at 9:05 pm
Mayor Scoma reconvened the meeting at 9:14 pm
11.
PZ 2000 -09 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF DOSKOCIL
FOOD SERVICE COMPANIES FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW
EXTERIOR MATERIALS OTHER THAN MASONRY ON AN ADDITION TO AN
EXISTING FACILITY ON LOT AR -1, BLOCK 3, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION IN AN
12- INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 6350 BROWNING CT
- ORDINANCE NO. 2467
APPROVED
Mr. Tom Rutledge, applicant, summarized his request.
Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city
codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to
come forward.
Mr. Richard Haas, 7829 Emerald Hills Way, is in favor of request.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing.
Mayor Pro Tern Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Metts to approve PZ 2000-
09, Ordinance No. 2467.
Motion to approve carried 7 -0.
City Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 8
12.
PS 2000 -06 - CONSIDER REQUEST OF TEAGUE, NALL & PERKINS, INC., FOR A
REPLAT TO BE KNOWN AS LOT A -R1, BLOCK 3, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF
WULIGER WAY & BROWNING COURT.
APPROVED
Councilman Don Phifer abstained from discussion and voting.
Mr. Rutledge summarized his request.
Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city
codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Mayor Pro Tern Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Milano to approve PS 2000-
06.
Motion to approve carried 6 -0, with Councilman Phifer abstaining.
13.
PZ 2000 -10 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF DUNAWAY
ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SHADY GROVE
BAPTIST CHURCH FROM U- INSTITUTIONAL TO C1- COMMERCIAL AND SEVERAL
TRACTS IN THE THOMAS PECK SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1210 ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF SHADY GROVE ROAD FROM AG- AGRICULTURAL TO C1- COMMERCIAL
(LOCATED AT 8241 PRECINCT LINE ROAD AND 8700 BLOCK OF SHADY GROVE
ROAD) ORDINANCE NO. 2471
APPROVED
Mr. Tom Galbreath summarized his request.
Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city
codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak for the
request to come forward.
Mr. Bill Weaver of Shady Grove Baptist Church came forward to speak in favor of
request.
City Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 9
Mayor Scoma called for anyone wishing to speak against the request to come forward.
The following people came forward:
Theresa Hampton, 8601 Saddle Ridge Trail; John Grubb, 8116 Pecan Ridge; Ray
Schiltz, 8313 Thorncrest Court; Steve Bruning, 8612 Kensington; Joseph Engroff, 8321
Thornhaven Court; Kirk Roberts, 8612 Steeple Ridge; and James T. Johnson, 8913
Thornmeadow Court.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing.
Mayor Pro Tern Johnson moved, approved by Councilman Metts to approve
PZ 2000 -10, Ordinance No. 2471.
Motion to approve carried 5 -2; with Councilmen Welch, Metts, Phifer, Milano and Mayor
Pro Tern Johnson voting for and Councilmen Mitchell and Trevino voting against.
14.
PZ 2000 -12 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF JOE DORRIS
TO AMEND THE APPROVED SPECIAL USE PERMIT (ORDINANCE NO. 2254) FOR
A CONTRACTORS OFFICE WITH GARAGE IN A C2 — COMMERCIAL ZONING
DISTRICT ON A LOT 1 RA, BLOCK 33, COLLEGE HILLS ADDITION. THE
PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 5949 DAVIS BOULEVARD. ORDINANCE NO. 2472.
APPROVED,
Mr. Joe Dorris summarized his request.
Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city
codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak in
favor to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Scoma asked
anyone wishing to speak in opposition to come forward.
Ms. Amy Pridgett, 7800 Terry Drive, spoke in opposition of request.
Councilman Welch asked Ms. Ratcliff if surrounding neighbors and businesses got
notice of tonight's meeting.
Ms. Ratcliff advised Council that staff is not required to send letters for the Council
meetings, but are required to put a notice in the paper. Per city ordinance staff is
required to notify people of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
City Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 10
Councilman Welch wants record to show that he supports an ordinance that will notify
the people of proposed changes and special use permits.
Councilman Welch asked Council to consider that the motion include the stipulation
that the property is not fenced, but still has to be manicured.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing.
Councilman Trevino moved to approve PZ 2000 -12, Ordinance No. 2472 as
recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission with the exception that all
building elevations have an exposed aggregate finish. Mayor Pro Tern Johnson
seconded the motion.
Motion to approve carried 7 -0.
15.
PZ 2000 -13 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF ASG
NORTHWOOD PLAZA, LTD, FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON LOT 2R, BLOCK 2,
SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDITION FROM C1- COMMERCIAL TO C2-
COMMERCIAL. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 6805 N. E. LOOP 820.
ORDINANCE NO. 2469
APPROVED
Ms. Benita Berhnard, representing owner, summarized her request.
Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city
codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Council discussed the item.
Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to
come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public
hearing.
Councilman Mitchell moved to approve PZ 2000 -13, Ordinance No. 2469 with the
stipulation that the age of the rental car not be over 2 years of age. Councilman Phifer
seconded the motion.
Motion to approve carried 5 -2; with Councilmen Mitchell, Metts, Phifer, Milano and
Mayor Pro Tern Johnson voting for and Councilmen Welch and Trevino voting against.
City Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 11
16.
PS 99 -16 - CONSIDER REQUEST OF CHRISTOPHER JONES FOR A REPLAT TO
BE KNOWN AS LOTS 2R, 3 & 4, BLOCK 1, DAVIS NORTH TARRANT COUNTY
PARKWAY ADDITION. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
INTERSECTION OF DAVIS BLVD & NORTH TARRANT PARKWAY
APPROVED
Mr. Chris Jones, 9401 LBJ Freeway, summarized his request.
Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city
codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Mayor Pro Tern Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Welch to approve PS 99 -16
as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Motion to approve carried 7 -0.
17.
PS 2000 -04 - CONSIDER REQUEST OF JIM MAKENS FOR A FINAL PLAT OF LOT
1, BLOCK 1, GIBSON ADDITION. (PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST
INTERSECTION OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD AND IS ADDRESSED AS 8616 DAVIS
BOULEVARD)
APPROVED
Mr. Daryl Gibson, representing applicant, summarized request.
Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city
codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Mayor Scoma addressed the water drainage of property onto the northern property
owners in Keller. He inquired if applicant acquired letters of acceptance from northern
property owners.
Mr. Dickens advised Council that staff would pursue obtaining a letter of agreement
from the adjacent property owner.
Mr. Gibson stated that Mr. Makens has a letter from the north property owner for
approval to drain onto their property.
Councilman Phifer moved, seconded by Councilman Metts to approve PS 2000 -04.
Motion to approve carried 7 -0.
City Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 12
18.
GN 2000 -38 - INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL FOR DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF
COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE - RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -10
APPROVED
Mr. Dickens advised Council of two options that the city had for cost participation. Staff
recommends approving the interlocal agreement, option 2. Option 2 is based on the
cost to each city being fixed for a four -year period.
Mayor Pro Tern Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Milano to approve
GN 2000 -38, Resolution No. 2000 -10, Option 2 as recommended by staff.
Motion to approve carried 7 -0.
A. CITIZENS PRESENTATION
Mr. Robert O'Reilly, 9001 Trails Edge, believes the letter and logo size should remain
as recommended by the Land Use Ad -Hoc Committee.
Ms. Mary Sands, 7625 Deaver Drive, would like to have more than 23 days a year to
have a portable sign. She is proposing 30 days, 4,times a year.
David Hargrave, sign owner, would like Council to reconsider what is right for small
business owners.
Stacy Taylor, portable sign owner, asked Council to reconsider the sign ordinance.
B. INFORMATION AND REPORTS
City Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 13
16.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Scoma adjourned the meeting at 11:24 pm.
Charles Scoma - Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson - City Secretary
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 4/24/00
Subject: Award of Bid for the 25th Year CDBG Proiect/Maryanna Agenda Number: PW 200042
Way and Nancy Lane to Stabile & Winn, Inc. in the amount
of $220,702.55
The City Council passed Resolution No. 99 -06 on February 8, 1999 which identified
Maryanna Way and Nancy Lane Street Improvements as the 25th Year Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) for the City. In coordination with Tarrant County, staff
has had this project designed, reviewed, and approved for bidding. The bids were taken
on February 16, 2000, the low bidders are as shown below.
This project will consist of reconstructing both Maryanna Way and Nancy Lane from
Maplewood Avenue to Janetta Drive.
The following is an estimated schedule for construction.
Award of Bid April 24, 2000
Preconstruction Conference May 5, 2000
Begin Construction May 15, 2000
End Construction September 15, 2000
The amount of funds available for construction from the 25th Year CDBG Program is
$316,771.91. Any remaining funds will be carried over to the next year CDBG Program
Recommendation: To recommend Tarrant County award the contract to Stabile & Winn,
Inc. in the amount of $220,702.55, for a period of 120 calendar days.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO /Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
.. 71-� 1.1 ^ -
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Availaole
hector
actor
Page 1 of!
JV JYI�J /VV.Y I.IImY11YOr VIJ �. Am L. 611l.4rtl lnl ap rLV I. maryanna a.rll
,�. CIRCL'E—DR.
L-AR.Y=DR. � r
o:.
? LNO A;5 T_OR�
V
Ma a Way
s� Pl `��^ LrN Street
�NOREA \ �� yt
-� \A o 'A� o Improvements
`MRISTOVHE -�
h
z!
3�
u
—LEw OQZA.) E_—
CJ44jNCS
2
Y, 1al
ADE
NIL'LER_D
U
e
W
2
VIDUAR_OR
YAPL
!� I
j CL "E N15�'lN-
�I
°
P
Z
O I I
N
W / E
5
NORTH
RICHLAND
P
HILLS
Z
IO
m Protect Location
N_
W 2 >
<
zi > O
< U
N� Z
J <
2
b�
Mary � anna Way
Street
I'mproveme.nt a
/ NE —INr RSt
ova <Ur
Department of Information Services • Geographic Information Systems (GI
49
av aun of vo:ai:vo manaay vIJ no: vvu I nmL:ctp.amlmap PLOT: nancy s.rtl
—J
RRY =CT--::D
.1
h
u�
ul
a,
2__SCMILLER DR
21 m,
Wi a)
U' <I
V IIi
13
V
r-::)
W
u' b
I �
W
V;
7
z�
W
Y
II
I
I
A
I
r_4 A_RY_DR. �W\
Nancy Ln.
Street
CI
p LYNDA_L-N.
0
Improvements
P� Q <
\f /
3
1 z
m
°
0
=0R _ YOIL:ZDR.
AR-DR.
)n5 CT.
e, 3
N 2 p (�
N � III
JII
NIAPLfW000_AYE.�
_uARLEW000_AV
BIRCNW000_OR =
'CCENIS�tN
II
I
II °
I w
� � I
I. >
ZI
N� 2
Nancy Ln:
�h
�Stree
`o`,1
rid
N
5
NORTH
RICHLAND
r-
L
HILLS
Project Location
Department of Information Services - Geographic Information Systems IGIS)
51
J.Qe; M G
�1? TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS
�/�/ wc. ENGINEERS ♦ SURVEYORS ♦ MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS
Mr. Mike Curtis, P.E.
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182 -0609
RE:
Dear Mike:
February 22, 2000
FEB 23 2000
i
11pil Public Norkg
CDBG - 25 th Year Project
Maryanna Way & Nancy Lane Street Improvements
City of North Richland Hills /Tarrant County
TNP# TAR99256
On February 16, 2000 bids were received for the above referenced project. A total of ten bids were
received as follows:
Stabile & Winn, Inc.
Richard Carr Construction
J.L. Bertram Construction
Gilco Contracting
McClendon Construction
Sutton & Associates, Inc.
Pavecon, Inc.
Ed A. Wilson, Inc.
Reynolds Asphalt & Const
Branch & Sons
TOTAL BASE BID
$220,702.55
$223,768.48
$224,175.15
$226,506.20
$233,262.70
$245,867.20
$253,746.75
$264,247.25
$278,481.25
$297,804.30
We have evaluated the low bid and found it to be complete and responsive. Based upon experience
references obtained from projects of similar scope and size, I recommend that the City of North
Richland Hills make the recommendation to Tarrant County to award the construction contract for
Maryanna Way & Nancy Lane Street Improvements to Stabile & Winn, Inc. for the total base bid of
$220,702.55. A sum of $316,771.91 is available for construction of this project. Any remaining funds
will carry over to the 26`h year CDBG project
A complete bid tabulation is attached for your use. If you have any questions or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to call.
Yours Very Truly,
TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC.
Greg D. Saunders, P.E.
GDS
enclosure
cc: Don Day - Tarrant County Community Development
915 FLORENCE STREET
FORT *VR7H, TEXAS 76102
(817) JJ6 -5773
FAX (817) 336 -2813
}
Fn
0
w
Y
U
w
S
U
y
0
m
f9
Z
0 0 0 0 0 LO o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O It O O CO q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
N
C
J
9
0 CD
aM} 0�
O O M 04 v O00 °v O N v N O O
to
(0n
O
O
(COn
IQ (ND (D
�- v M N O N o O N o 0� - fA -.07 Ln to o
(D
60 V! M M N N 69 69 V9 V3
f/9 69 fR fig f9 69 69 69 64 V9
N
04
10
0
a
c
O o (D LO o LO 0 0 (D 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
L)
U
O (C) M O O M M M "t
0 0
(�
O O N 0= "t - M M 0 O M M O G
Vi Vi V9 V3 W Vi 69 69 69 O 69 Vi
N O
Z O
U
� (MO O 609
fA (n 69 Lc M
69 in
J
00 auomw00000000000
� N t` 0 Cl 'IT (n N 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
LO
c
Q
w t` V M W 00 ri (O O O O M 0 O M C O
LC) LO (C) (A M O N O O
tC>
N
W
06
(C) r N O V 00 r- e-
(D r M .- Lq N O r' (C) N O n M P- 0 0
O
t• N O W o tD M N N N tri 69 N I W)
v
h
C
69 M � 69 69 C14 C14 � N9 M Vi Vi 69 d9
N
O
V
y31
J
J
Cl) 0) N N O LO N st O LO O O O O N O O O
LO t• .t t- O 0) a) N Cl) f.- O O O O O DI O O
Q
m
Z
69 b9 69 O 69 69 69 69 to 69 69 O O
N
a/ '
O
♦
ON (N'1 6M9
69 v9 69 u9 (Cj (Cj
zw
ZQ
=
O O N M 0 It 0 0 0 0 0 (O O o 0 0
(D 0 0 0
00
7
J �_
m
J
O O OD 00 r O M V d: O 00 CO 04
U
N
Q
M M0ON CO M N CO 0O
M O Oi 'd (D * n U Cn 00 O
M
(D
= Z
C
00 c9
O M I O M d: M r- f` d M N� O O
h
f -• Q G7
Z F-
j
`
0 . ' C° d (n +C)
r 69 6% M N N N (A 69 69 Vi
M
N
O Z
O
69 69 69 Vf V) 69 69 ff) V9 V9
04
n� co O( i (' (ND v (MD tD M .= rn O O
W U
Z Q A
W
F
M N M '7 M M M M W M O N N O O
ffi 69 69 to 69 69 69 69 f9
Z Q O
Z 0
� 69 - O O
.
D U
Lci Lf
O Q d
v9 in
0 0 0 0 0 �n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(n
(n
Z?
J
000oO�- v000oOo00000
0 0 0
N
Q Q W
Q
F-
0 0 0 e- (n N Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r` (D r` O t` M w 0 O M O to O N O O O
O
LL
} W
C
C
O
(O CM v_ Cl! v_ O � - CO N h O t v_ (f) 0 0
69 69 M
n
O
0^
00 LO v c) M M r OA O 4� r td In
I.i.
cQ
F- G Ui
ofi
�-
69 69 (A M N N N 69 (fl Vi 69 - -
vi 69 V9 69 V! fH 69 W% 69
N
04
W
f- Z
O 00 0 O m O O O O O O O O O O O O
0� O O
UJ Q
H
Z 0
O N O N 0 M of (n O O O N O O
69 69 69 O 69 69 69 ff!
Z
a
� � M CO N O O
u9 69 69
C)
L)
,, ,(, �,
Q
U
in in
_
F-
W
Q
0
H
ww } }zr }(Lwwa¢¢¢Y�(n(n
Z
(n J U [n O (n (n J Cn (n W W W W (n Cn J J
M
O O r` LO O o 0 0 N 04 0 0
(n 00 ' O r f` O N O N N N
Q
CD V: 00 co O N -
v M N CO (O 00
(V - 't M
W
Q
W
Z
U)
a C7 Z ° ° z z
po w Q ¢
!q
H
m p O O
Z
C)
W (D w w
> W>
Y
o
t`
tip
°¢W> a ~W U�
°vx° w
W
C)
Om
° wW °¢a
o.�
Zw
F�mw��a Z000 0z~
4 W
(D�'N
N w
FW- FW-
W W W o (/� O° F- Y O M F- j J
Z
co
rn¢
a
s
m
U U `t U Q w Q w Q x x (mn
0
2
a
m
N (L
O U ° W U m
m
J W
o o v~i ° m 000 (n m
w
FQ-• m a o
U
U U°
w LL W° w w w W 0 0
w
w
Z Z
Lu
z x
0
O O LL' �° m (� ° w w t� w w a J 0 z z
F- F- (n >
m
J
iii
m W W
O
W W ►- F- U U Q W W W h F- F- O m J J
>> w a¢°��F -Comma w
0 0 g2
°UU
J
tL C7
2zUUa>>>o
U ° _ = Q Z z F- J N (_n
FQ-
O
w 0
F- V
z z °_
F- w m m
w W Z_ F- O O O
D OD = v N to U U Q Q Q !4 U)
F-
W O
N M t (n (O r DD M 0 N M V' LO (D f• W
}
Fn
0
w
Y
U
w
S
U
y
0
m
f9
Z
5-
m
0
w
Y
U
w
U
D
m
0 0 0 0 0 0 (n 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
M
Q
N O Q) 0 0 a0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W
�O
V
C
�
O O O O O M O O O O O 00 m O O
O (O O O N� 00 co O t` O O (O co O O
q*
N
N
O
a0 v co O m m N a 0 N M (ci CO
V
d
C
O
60 69 CO N Cl) N Cl) 69 f9 W, Vi
69 69 69 b9 69 69 to f9 W>
(O
N
a
Q
F-
0 0 0 0 0 0 (O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N h U7 N O O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O
W
- N N E C; to t7 4 a C; C7 0
to 69 O Vi - mg, 69 O O O O 69 69 O O
Q
b9 6H V! M69 6069 69 64 O U7
69 V)
J
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O .-- (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
n
Q
O O O O O 9 O O O O O O O N N O O
N 0 0 0 00 N V O O N 0 0 0 0 0
co
V
F-
O
N sI C'7 t` st C' O a0 O N O t- (O Y V' q O O
f" 60
r�
C
h CM n O- - (O N M CO r N v v O O
M
M - M V N N 69 69 69
69 69 69 69 69 69 f9 69 69 Vi 69 69
O
N
(n
C
O
69
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
J d
_
O O O N O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0
=
d
�' Cl)
O O N N O aD r 0 m M O to 0 0 m M O O
69 69 - 69 N 69 69 69 69 0 n N O 69 69 O O
in
O
69 - e ' Cl) 6f1 C*4 O O
69 O O
gZ
LU
U J
Q
J
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O to Cq 0 0 It 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
N
}
m N O-.
Q
O O t` O O CO N C) N C) O CD CD O N 1t C) 0
t-
.
n� 00 a0 O O M co O 00 O O O O O O O
(O O O Y O O) O Vi •- 00 t,- (O N "t O O
CO
00
ol
F- Q !n
O
F-
N 6% 69 M N N CV W, i9 69 f9
W Z Z
Q
6% f9 69 69 Vi 69 69 69 69 69
(vim
( O (0 N O (0 v 0 COO v 0 0 0 0 N 0 0
Q 2 G
w
L'
O
r Ch N N O 00 st e- M M O 0 Cj O M Cl) Cj O
M 6ri 69 O 69 (9 69 b9 O O W9 69
Z } >
Q 0
7
H
z
�
-
a C) O O
69 69 69 � Vy
D
V
(C) N
O Q W
i9 E;
J
°o, 00 0 000 00 m 00 00, 00 00, DO DO 00 Do 00 D0 °o °o
°n
I- z
Z O
Z {"'
} LLJ
V
Q
F-
O O n O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N O N O 0 0
O (D O O W (O 00 O O O
N
(D
O^
W
«
N
O
M O 0 0 a0 I- O O O V 0) 0 0
v (A (t) O_ CT C7 O N (0 a0 t` M L6 u_7
N
0M
LL
Q F-
0
~
69 69 M M N N E9 69 613,
H 69 69 Vi 69 69 69 69 69 W3.
M
N69
1.�1..�
W
F- U)
U
F-
~
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O N O O O O O 0 O O O O O n 0 0
N 4 O o O O O
Z y
Z 0
Z
w
IL
N
Z
N - fV O f` 7 M O N
69 C9 69 O 69 b9 A. 69 O O N O 69 69 O O
OU
J
U
0
p
D U
�"' 69 t- N 69 N O O
69 69 69 69 U7 U7
v� �
~
J
w
p
~
LL LL }} Z }} LL LL LL Q Q Q Q }} (n (n
Z
(n LL Ci (n 0 0 (n fn J Cn (n W W W W (n (n J J
M
W
0 0 h V O O O O O N N O O .-- �--
O 00 N O- N N N
O co 4 (D
(D sf t` O a0 (R n N V
Q
Z
Q
W
C1
W
Z
z
U)
J� w U U
Q c z o p
�xsO w Q
N
Z
0°0
w
F
j w> m} W o 0 w 0
Y
O
LL
0
W 0
Q p Q W} LL H w C' U p p J J
N
d y
� o
_
m
W W w m � Z
W
LO w
z
w w O M F- O
D
N O
V%
W m O W o p H Y c J_
U
Z Z
Q6
rn Q
�� ZQ
F-
am
Q
w v w U z z Z x Q
zz�'�UapW Qo�U�OO �a�
0
OU OU
J W
FQ- w° o
U
p w LL p W p w w w
w
Z2
LL
W
w rt 0 0
0-
O (n
zW
D
LL W p Q p p W W O W w Q J V Z Z
OONwwm(n�HF- >p0gQ
Q
m
0 j
mO w
�(n�
>> m
~ Q Q
J
0
z Q
LE
w (~n vt-i (~n a p w w
O O g U V
2
p
° O p p
Z a>>> O U U
i U_ p == Q Z Z r- ' (n N
Fa--
O
W O
F- U
w m m
w 5 ao z `v iv 00 O O o< Q O
w 0
�- N co d' O (O r- OO 0) O N( V' Ln (D r- 00
�r - - -
F_Z
5-
m
0
w
Y
U
w
U
D
m
w
0
M
a
cm
w
A
CL
w
IL
W
w
O
Q
co
W
{Q
r
i fi1
W
Z
g
}
U
ZZ
0 W
z2
a
ap
M
a
Z ;�
Z �-
w
�w
cy-
Z
O
F-
n_
it
U
U)
W
0
N
w
w
D
0
m
12
LO 00 .t (D
(D st r--_
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
o
J
O O O 't O M w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl)
V
a
0 0 0 co O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K
`
F-
to 0 w O N O N m O O O to 0 w M O O O
M M to r OJ to r 0 00 O to (D N O O 00
C
O
v tT M
v Lo 00 N Q7 CV h ti v Ii C6 6' r 6'� (C) 01 to to n
Ci
~
M CO tt � 69 69 Vi *a U)
t9 6% �
U
to
c
Z w
2a2 U
t9 b9 69 69 69 69
NVi
°
U)
°
oo
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w
H
~
O O O (D O M CD O (D to O o 0 0 o U') O O
0 4 6
'_NC)
O
N O N O 00 4 4 6 to 0 0 0 0 0
69 CA 69 O 6T 6A rH V) M O� N O O
u
Z
6-3. fl a
m
D
603, in (.s r� � tri tri
p'
°0
69 69
co
W w W 9 m 0 Z � U C7
C7
~ LL LL )- } z} >- LL LL LL Q a a a} y. 0 m
Z (n J() fA
0 0 m U) J m m W W W w (n U) J -t
LO 00 .t (D
(D st r--_
o0 to0 O0 000000000000 to
F-
J
O O (D 0 0 D1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N
°
r
to O 00 (D to O (n O O O O O O O C) 0 O O
V
F-
O 't O to O 00 M 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
O N 0 0 O V CO 00 N to M r 0 0 �
w
J?
O
O t h
M Cd M (3i tT O Q) D1 (D tb (n r at V! (O t` to 4_7 O
Ci
~
69 Cl) 69 M N N N fH 69 (R 69 W, n
A
CL
Z w
2a2 U
fA 60 69 69 69 69 Vi 69 69 (+H N
s
°
oo
o o to o o to to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w
H
O O O O Oq: r 0 0 to O O o 0 W7 O O O
0 0 0 t 0 0
'_NC)
C/)
O M N et O 0 (n r st M 0 to
69 64 N69 tR 0 Vi 44 69 (R 0 0 N N GFi 69 O O
o
0
6r9
�.
D O
f9 V). 6% 69 Lj Lj
p'
°0
69 69
~ LL LL )- } z} >- LL LL LL Q a a a} y. 0 m
Z (n J() fA
0 0 m U) J m m W W W w (n U) J -t
_0
m
w
a
CD
a
0
F-
>-
m
O
W
Y
U
w
U
U)
0
m
LO 00 .t (D
(D st r--_
iD r O O O O N N o O r r
O) n t-- 00 N O N N N
00 00 (D P%. N "t �t
F-
N r�
CO (7 N (D CO r r
Z
r
a
w
J?
W W
Z
Ci
_0
m
w
a
CD
a
0
F-
>-
m
O
W
Y
U
w
U
U)
0
m
F
w
J?
W W
Z
Z w
2a2 U
z z
N
z
°
oo
w
H
W d z W
> m< m} W W Q(Dw W
o 0
N
o
0
0 0 0 0 (\ } W r 0 111 O (L
a Q
a y ck:
wf
°0
Z
m
W w W 9 m 0 Z � U C7
C7
0 W
(On W
N
W W W m o (� Q D F- Y O Oz O� p
U) Z
aZ
M
n_
m
Z z E cn 0 w Q w a w a p
N a D
(9
W
a
F- O m 03: U m MO
U (n
uj a C7
F"w
a)�
U)
00 OW ¢ U) Of �w�w>
Y00
Wz
0,
LL
F-
C)
o O Fn C m w F- F- v) >
W W�� W W U)
U Z Z
m
J
m W
O
Q 2
F- U U a W F- F- F-
>> w Q a o W W ►- w 0 0 a
p W w
a 2
n. (D
_�
0~
0
22U _ =aZZ� "') 0-) O
�
(�(_n
W O
F U
Z z
F- w
0
m m
w w Z_ ? F- 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 ao = a N (A U U I a Q Q v
0
m
0
r O — N CO '� to
N M � (n (D r` 00 O — r- — — �-
(D � 00
Fw-- Z
_0
m
w
a
CD
a
0
F-
>-
m
O
W
Y
U
w
U
U)
0
m
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
, Department: Public Works Department Council Meeting Date: 4/24/00
Subject: Approve Interlocal Agreement with Tarrant County for Agenda Number: PW 2000 -13
the Maintenance of North Tarrant Parkway —
Resolution No. 2000 -027
Tarrant County requires an annual interlocal agreement for all County owned roadways
that are located within the city limits of a city. The annual agreement for North Tarrant
Parkway is required in order to clearly define who will maintain, police, and sign the
roadway. This agreement does not cover any issues dealing with expansion of the
roadway.
The key issues are summarized below:
1. Tarrant County agrees to provide all labor, equipment, and materials necessary to
maintain and reconstruct existing sections of North Tarrant Parkway for
maintenance purposes that are within the corporate city limits of North Richland
Hills.
2. The City of North Richland Hills agrees to maintain the approaches to the roadway.
3. The City of North Richland Hills agrees to provide intersection channelization and all
markings, signs and signals.
4. The City of North Richland Hills agrees to continue policing responsibilities related
to the roadway.
The City's responsibilities listed above are not new. The City has been responsible for
these items in the past.
The Attorney for the City has reviewed and approved the agreement.
Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 2000 -027.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Account Number
Bonds (GO /Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
Operating Budget
Other Finance Director
epa n raid S i g mkGre City Man Signature
Page 1 of _
RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -027
WHEREAS, Tarrant County has proposed an interlocal agreement dealing with
North Tarrant Parkway; and
WHEREAS, Tarrant County and the City of North Richland Hills mutually benefit
from the said interlocal agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1.
The City Manager be, and is hereby authorized to execute the attached contract
with Tarrant County as the act and deed of the City of North Richland Hills.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 24th day of April, 2000.
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
CONTRACT
This Agreement made and entered into this the _ day of , 2000, by and
between the County of Tarrant, acting herein by and through its governing body the Commissioners
Court, hereinafter referred to as TARRANT COUNTY, and the CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS acting herein by and through its governing body, hereinafter referred to as THE CITY, both
of Tarrant County, State of Texas, witnesseth:
WHEREAS, this Agreement is made under the authority granted by and pursuant to Chapter
791 of the Texas Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the party or parties paying for the performance of governmental functions or
services shall make payments therefore from current revenues available to the paying party; and,
WHEREAS, the governing bodies of the two parties find that the project or undertaking is
necessary for the benefit of the public and that each party has the legal authority to build or maintain
the project or to provide such service, and the construction and improvement thereof is in the
common interest of both parties hereto; and that the division of costs provided for constitutes
adequate consideration to each party; said project being more particularly described as:
Any needed roadway reconstruction and routine maintenance of North Tarrant Parkway, a
county thoroughfare connecting the county road system and lying within the City of North
Richland Hills. Specifically, the section of North Tarrant Parkway lying within the City of
North Richland Hills from Precinct Line Road to 2900 feet west of Smithfield Road (city
limit line). The work will include maintenance of the right -of -way.
WHEREAS, the parties hereto, in order to facilitate the financing and construction of the
needed facility, and in order to share the costs of having said work to be done have agreed to share
in the financing of said construction as hereinafter stated in detail.
The CITY must notify the COUNTY within thirty days of the completion of this project of
any complaint the CITY has with the project.
For and in consideration of the mutual undertaking hereinafter set forth and for adequate
consideration given, the parties agree as follows:
1. TARRANT COUNTY agrees to maintain and reconstruct sections of North Tarrant
Parkway that lie within the corporate city limits of North Richland Hills.
2. TARRANT COUNTY agrees to provide all labor, equipment and materials necessary to
accomplish the work.
3. The CITY agrees to maintain the approaches to the roadway.
4. The CITY agrees to provide intersection channelization and all markings, signs and
signals.
5. The CITY agrees to continue policing responsibilities related to the roadway.
By entering into this Agreement the parties do not create any obligations express or implied
other than those set forth herein and this Contract shall not create any rights in parties not
signatories hereto.
The parties to this Agreement do not intend by this Agreement that any specific third party
may obtain a right by virtue of the execution or performance of this Agreement. CITY agrees that
the COUNTY will notify the CITY when the COUNTY is performing major reconstruction on this
project, but this Agreement does not require the County to do this project within any particular time
frame.
events:
This Agreement shall terminate automatically upon happening of any of the following
1. The completion of the improvement provided for herein or;
2. At the end of one (1) year from date herein, unless renewed by both parties in writing.
By:
Authorized City Official
ATTEST: CITY
TARRANT COUNTY:
TOM VANDERGRIFF, County Judge
ATTEST: COUNTY
B. GLEN WHITLEY
COUNTY COMMISSIONER, PRECINCT 3
*APPROVED AS TO FORM
District Attorney's Office
* By law, the District Attorney's Office may only advise or approve contracts or legal documents
on behalf of its clients. It may not advise or approve a contract or legal document on behalf of other
parties. Our review of this document was conducted solely from the legal perspective of our client.
Our approval of this document was offered solely for the benefit of our client. Other parties should
not rely on this approval, and should seek review and approval by their own respective attorney(s).
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/24/00
Subject: Request of U.S. Restaurant Properties, Inc for a Final Plat Agenda Number: PS 2000 -12
of Lot 1,Block 1, Vista Addition. This Property is Located at the Southeast Corner of
Davis Boulevard and Precinct Line Road at 8612 Davis Boulevard.
CASE SUMMARY:
Welch Engineering is proposing to final plat one lot containing 1.3 acres and zoned "C -1"
Commercial. The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Precinct Line Road
and Davis Boulevard. A Specific Use Permit (PZ 99 -47) for a convenience store with a car
wash was approved by City Council on February 28, 2000.
The applicant has made the necessary revisions to the plat per the Public Works memo
dated March 23, 2000. The remaining comments listed in the engineer's letter are not
related to the final plat approval by the City Council and will be addressed by Public
Works.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on April 13, 2000, recommend
approval of PS 2000 -12 the Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Vista Addition at 8612 Davis
Boulevard by a vote of 7 to 0.
To approve PS 2000 -12 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO /Rev.)
Operating Budget J l
4t /qr
DeIrtmerk Head Sir f ure
Finance Review .
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Finance Director
City Mana er Signature
LL: \Cases \PS Cases\2000 Plats \PS 2000 -12 -41 FP Lot 1 Vista Addition.doc Page 1 of 1
7PICS
IAIC
TRICS
TRIOS
PZ 2000-12 - FINAL PLAT
LOT 11 BLOCK 1
VISTA ADDITION
VIC-
7XIBJ
xic rFLICT m:cs -milm
IIIIIIIIIIIIt a mb -&-It 4 KELLE■ CITY LIMITS
C �aoa --.Uj
2-YO 6
2306
AG ■
P--:
-'AC7 C-U I glv S?-
z
rku
>
RIC �TPLn r.UE
OR
A G A
-to, 7P
A G -RLE -t.Lki
me -R [At 7P.:c Tp-
AG LU
Z w MURPHY RD
G
swl
15A 14A
i7
C-2 --------
Q
IAIC
TRICS
TRIOS
PZ 2000-12 - FINAL PLAT
LOT 11 BLOCK 1
VISTA ADDITION
VIC-
7XIBJ
xic rFLICT m:cs -milm
IIIIIIIIIIIIt a mb -&-It 4 KELLE■ CITY LIMITS
C �aoa --.Uj
2-YO 6
2306
AG ■
P--:
-'AC7 C-U I glv S?-
z
rku
>
RIC �TPLn r.UE
OR
A G A
-to, 7P
A G -RLE -t.Lki
me -R [At 7P.:c Tp-
AG LU
Z w MURPHY RD
IN
O
to cc 7 A G
SHADY GROVE ROAD
24
-u-
2218
99e
3
V
.;w A:T.
IRK' JAI
NORTH TARR-ANT PKWY
16
G
swl
15A 14A
i7
C-2 --------
Q
!a
Im
u
AG
LLI
:7 12
ix
(L
U
24
C-11
25
19 to
1254 Rce
75 pc
m
9
IN
O
to cc 7 A G
SHADY GROVE ROAD
24
-u-
2218
99e
3
V
.;w A:T.
IRK' JAI
NORTH TARR-ANT PKWY
16
16
i7
!a
24
25
x
-7
m
6.
PS 2000 -12
CONSIDER REQUEST OF WELCH ENGINEERING FOR A FINAL PLAT OF
LOT 1, BLOCK 1, VISTA ADDITION. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DAVIS BLVD AND PRECINCT LINE ROAD
APPROVED
Welch Engineering is proposing a final plat of one lot containing 1.3 acres, which
is zoned C1- Commercial. All of Public Works requested revisions have been
made and staff recommends approval of PS 2000 -12.
Mr. Welch stated that he would be abstaining from discussion and voting of this
item.
Mr. Lueck, seconded by Mr. Blue, moved to approve PS 2000 -12. The
motion carried with a vote of 6 — 0. Mr. Welch abstained.
P & Z Minutes
April 13, 2000
WELCH ENOWEERIN0, INC.
14rm�z��
CONSULTING ENG INEERS
April 5, 2000
Julia W. Skare, P.E.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
P.O. Box 820609
N. Richland Hills, TX 76180
RE: PS2000 -12, VISTA ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 1, Final Plat
�odr�o
APR S 2000
NRH Public Works
We have addressed your comments from your letter dated April 4, 2000. Enclosed are 15 copies of the
Final Plat with the modified sanitary sewer easement.
1. Fire Hydrant: The fire hydrant does cover the proposed development.
2. Water: The 8" water line located in Davis and Precinct will be in the dedicated easements.
3. Sanitary Sewer: As noted.
4. Utility Easements: This revision has been made on the final plat.
5. Off -Site Easements: As noted.
6. ROW Dedication: As noted.
7. Driveway Approaches: As noted.
8. TXDOT Access Permit: As noted.
9. TXDOT Utility Easement: As noted.
10. Signatures: A final mylar with original signatures will be submitted once all the easements have
been filed.
11. Sidewalks: As noted.
12. Street Lighting: A light plan was provided on the last submittal with the construction plans. No
street lights were proposed in Davis and Precinct, since these are only TXDOT right -of -way. If the
City requests street lights in the TXDOT right -of -way, please obtain permission from this agency.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
C: \WEI\Job\ 1163\1 163—Skare—Fina1_p1at—P1ans.wpd
621 W. College Street • Grapevine, TX 76051 • 817- 410 -8018 • Fax 817 - 481 -2375
Sincerely,
WELCH ENG RING, INC.
;N
Timothy J. Welch, P.E.
C: \WENob \1163\1 163—Skare—Final_plat—Plans.wpd
NItHPublic Works / Administration
('TTY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
April 4, 2000
MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E., Staff Engineer
SUBJECT: PS2000 -12; VISTA ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 1; Final Plat
We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on March 28, 2000.
The following items are for your consideration.
FIRE HYDRANT The Design Manual contains criteria for necessary fire hydrant
coverage. A fire hydrant is proposed at the northeast corner of the site, which
will substantially contain the site within the 300 -foot radial distance required.
2. WATER An 8" waterline is proposed adjacent to Precinct Line Road and Davis
Boulevard. This main will need to be located on site in a waterline easement
dedicated by separate instrument.
3. SANITARY SEWER Plans have been submitted to the City by Civilworks for
East/West Partners. The Vista Addition engineer and developer are responsible
for designing and constructing sanitary sewer to their site. They are proposing to
tie to the sanitary sewer main previously submitted by Civilworks. A letter and
schedule from East/West Partners has been provided. This letter indicates when
the proposed main would be constructed. The easement documents have been
filed for this sanitary sewer main. The preconstruction conference for the
sanitary sewer main by others will need to take place prior to scheduling the
preconstruction conference of the civil improvements for Lot 1 or the issuance of
the building permit.
4. UTILITY EASEMENTS The 7.5 -foot utility easement on the rear of the property
has been shown. Separate signed water line easements have been provided for
review. The filed easements shall be provided prior to scheduling the
preconstruction conference or filing the plat. The proposed sanitary sewer main
on the south side of the property shall be contained in a minimum 15 -foot
sanitary sewer or utility easement. The location of the sanitary sewer was
revised. The plat shall reflect the appropriate easement to contain the sanitary
sewer main. A minimum of 7.5 feet is required on each side of the main. This
needs to be included on the next plat submittal.
P.O. Box 820609 * North Richland Hills, Texas * 76182 -0609
7301 Northeast Loop 820 * 817 - 427 -6400 * FAX 817- 427 -6404
Vista Addition, Block 1, Lot 1
Page 2 of 3
April 4, 2000
5. OFF SITE EASEMENTS All off site easements and exhibits have been
forwarded to the Public Works Department for review. Signed off site Mutual
Public Access easements and waterline easements have been submitted. A
Letter of Permission has been provided for the off site swale. The filed
easements need to be submitted to Public Works prior to filing the plat.
6. ROW DEDICATION ROW has previously been dedicated for Davis Boulevard
and Precinct Line Road. The ROW has been dimensioned from the centerline to
the ROW line on both streets.
7. DRIVEWAY APPROACHES Driveway approach spacing on Davis Boulevard
and Precinct Line Road are limited to 500 feet. A site plan dimensioning the
location of the driveway approaches from the intersection, the width of the
approaches and the curb return radii has been provided with the Final Plat
submittal. The approaches are proposed at the joint property lines as requested.
8. TXDOT ACCESS PERMIT The Plat is bordered by two State Highways,
Precinct Line Road and Davis Boulevard. A TxDOT Access Permit will be
required for each approach. The TxDOT permit application must be submitted to
Public Works for approval prior to submitting to TxDOT.
9. TXDOT UTILITY PERMIT The water main connections are located in the State
ROW. A utility permit application will need.to be submitted to Public Works for
approval prior to submitting to TxDOT.
10. SIGNATURES The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's
Acknowledgment and Dedication on the Final Plat. In addition, the surveyor's
seal and signature will need to be included on the mylar of the Final Plat.
11. SIDEWALKS The Subdivision Regulations require sidewalks adjacent to all
public streets. The sidewalks have been shown on the construction plans. The
sidewalks on state highways are to be located 4' -0 off of the ROW per TxDOT
standards.
12. STREET LIGHTING Street Lighting is required by Section 1 -06 of the Design
Manual. The locations of any existing streetlights need to be shown on the
topographical drawing to confirm compliance with current ordinances. Any
additional streetlights, which may be required, based on current ordinances,
needs to be coordinated with Public Works and TU Electric. The developer will
pay the cost for installation of any additional streetlights directly to TU Electric. It
Vista Addition, Block 1, Lot 1
Page 3 of 3
April 4, 2000
appears additional streetlights are required. It appears there are no existing or
proposed streetlights. Public Works requires a light schematic showing the foot -
candles provided for the onsite lighting. A minimum of 1 foot - candle is required
at driveway approach at the intersection of Davis Boulevard and Precinct Line
Road. A streetlight plan is required with the next Final Plat submittal as
previously requested.
This review was based on the review of the plat and civil construction plans. The
marked -up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal.
JW /smm /pwm200 -067
cc: Greg Dickens, P.E., Public Works Director
Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director
APPLICATION FOR PLATTING
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
TYPE OF PLAT: Preliminary Final Replat Amendment
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Name of Addition:
Location of Addition:
Number of Lots: - 4-
PROPERTY OWNER:
Acreage: 1,,j99 Zoning:
Name: L-(, S,
Address:lZL4V /i Way
State:_ Zip: ZS 942�:
Signature: 1 JV
APPLICANT:
Name: G/. ss' .og�?_#_ 7 % i .CllE�i rit/c.
Address: 122 li6z&jW,2
Stater_ Zip:
Signature:
SURVEYOR:
Name:
Address: 4G�L v Su �1t3�2 r Dry'
State: Zip: i
:Signature:
ENGINEER:
City of North Richland Hills
Developer Information Packet
12 -31 -99
Short Form Final
Contact: ., Sc or1' �i9LC�J�zl>
Clty: j Ai44 4
Phone: 97Z� -327 -1487
Fax: 4,7Z - 7!CZ- 804'7
Email: j��„n1,
Contact:
City:
Phone: 4?z-?£�7 -i C
Fax: q 77_ 7,c -t
Email: i?�F e
J ��
p y `u
LU 0
�ci
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/24/00
subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Tina Harvey Agenda Number: LRC 2000 -04
For Variances to the Landscape Regulations, Ordinance No. 2423 relative to a parking
lot adjacent to a public street. The property is located at 8021 Main Street on Lots 1 -8,
Block D, Smithfield Addition
General Description Tina Harvey has submitted an application to vary from the
Landscaping Regulations of Ordinance No. 2423. The request is associated with the
development of a parking lot for an existing 4,876 square foot historic building at 8021
Main Street. Ms. Harvey is proposing to develop a parking lot to provide the required off -
street parking on site. The existing historic building is aligned with the property lines at the
front along Main Street and the west along Snider Street.
The parking lot is proposed to be adjacent to the front property line on Main Street. The
Landscaping Regulations require a 15 foot front yard landscape setback and to provide
parking entrance islands. Ms. Harvey is proposing to landscape the right -of -way area
directly in front of the parking spaces along Main Street to serve as a small buffer. She
has also designed the layout of the parking lot to preserve four existing trees on site. The
attached drawing is a schematic of the proposed landscaped areas. Ms. Harvey will have
to submit a detailed landscape plan with her building permit.
Landscape Variance The applicant is requesting a variance to the following section:
G. Landscape Setback: There shall be a landscape setback having a minimum width of
15 feet adjacent to all public rights -of -way.
1.3 Landscaping of Parking Lots: Each drive approach for a property shall be
constructed with parking entrance islands on each side of the driveway. The parking
entrance islands shall be eighteen feet in length and 6 feet in width and planted with
shrubs.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
This property contains only 20,000 square feet and is developed with an historic structure
in the Smithfield area. The applicant is trying to meet the spirit of the landscape ordinance
but is physically unable to meet the current standards based on a lot depth of 100 feet.
The layout of the parking lot preserves four existing trees on site.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Account Number
Bonds (GO /Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
Operating Budget
Of r Finance Director
c
Dep ment ead Sig a ure City Manag ignature
\WRH_CITY_HALL2 \V0L1 \DATA \PZ \Cases \Landscape Review Committee \LRC 2000 -04 Tina Harvey 8021 Main Street.doc Page 1 of 2
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
RECOMMENDATION:
To approve the variance for LRC 2000 -04 to the Landscaping Regulations.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
\ \NRH_CITY_HALL2WOL1\ DATA \PZ\Cases \Lanuscape rceview 06.urnrr1111ee%LK%,, cvuv -Vl► i ma narvey 8021 Main Street.doc Page 2 of 2
EE Grid: 84 -440 Page: C4 )
H
'
q
R -2 R W
RIAROOD DR R -1 -S
77
1860
UO[V TTII K
11 Q
TURNER ST RI.A.R.D.I'L�`
CT I
, z �
0
�R -2
j 112.4
_. 0
r
<� i(l f z
�0 LRC 2000 -04
y S LANDSCAPE VARIANCE REQUEST
a
8021 MAIN STREET
A
, R AG
°e u . u
I -- - �3 O C � �. � i I i iv' C0
pE ODELL ST
e
R -2 L` 1959 I
{ I
AG R -2 2
K) N „� 1117 IC.K Y
i
I
{ AG ,
3 C._,2
Q.
1157
a
:
-
AG A G I- 2
NORTHEAS' v
" J
U
iann ( CORTLAND AN(t -3 I Cn 4j
n
U t� w
I
C-1
Rn 1094
A G
AG:
L R 11185
R -3 -1800 �R -3,
2047
°„ hc, U
AG
LR '¢ -1 SIR
I - 2
p \. 1091
GL�Ha, P)N18+A -
3 ..
J
I
����:�� �� C 2 �`v` ,— - R� A I N S TC - to
n z
j 4 I l . ar•1� ��W �� ,1 `� m '' 1- z
MIE RENEE LN Q �j�C�� " Z m o 1460
m A
'A `a N
N� 1 -2 ��� ����w NRH
Lj
_ 7M �� N
WESTCLIFF
-2
C-2 w„ 1"= 400'
i I I
,rid: 84 -432 Page: C6 ) ADOPTED: March 22, 1993 CURRENT THROUGH: Ordinance 2360, January 11, 1999
7n PI1PIf' "." i , — .11 11 ,
TO: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
LANDSCAPE REVIEW BOARD
FROM: TINA HARVEY
GRANDMA'S HOUSE, INC.
DATE: March 20, 2000
RE: APPLICATION FOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW
I submit the attached information for review by the board and ask for a variance to the landscape
requirements for the following.
Request: To waive the fifteen foot set back required from the property line for landscape
bordering the proposed parking lot and place landscaping within the right of way.
Purpose: Twenty parking spaces are required for business operations at this site. The business
requires outdoor space for a playground and outdoor seating. In order to fit twenty parking
spaces in the side lots available and leave room for outdoor activities and to maintain open area
on one side of the building, the parking lot needs to extend to the property line.
Special circumstances: This building, the old Smithfield Feed Store, was built in 1925 and the
building practices at that time were to place the building directly on the property line. Therefore,
the building itself sits on the south and west corner of the property line. In keeping with the time
period practices the landscaping would be placed along the street. The building lies within the
historic Smithfield section of North Richland Hills and hopes are to revive and restore this old
downtown area.
Note: Hopefully the Council and Public Works Department will consider installing sidewalks
along Main Street. The proposed landscaping at this site would allow space for a sidewalk.
NKH
LANDSCAPE REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION
City of North Richland Hills
7301 NE Loop 820
(Please print or type all responses)
North Richland Hills, TX
817 581 -5500
PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of applicant:
v,4 4 -A P ✓Ir Y
Street address of applicant:
2930 ROgI1V94I:E
City/State2p Code of applicant
Telephone number of applicant:
41'7 4 91.4 2-34
G-wevw &, TX 710051
.
FAX number of applicant:
Are you the owner of the
Are you the owner's agent?
NOTE: If you are not the owner of the property, you must attach
property?
a letter from the property owner giving you permission to submit
Yes No
Yes El No
this application.
PART 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY
INFORMATION
Subject Property Legal Description:
SMITHFIEI -D LoT5 THp-v $ FLOC K
Subject Property Street Address:
i00 Z I M/-I N ST. N R 4
PART 3. REQUEST TYPE
Interpretation Request P9 Landscape Variance Request Nonconforming Use
Current zoning classification:
Note: A map or plot plan of the property and drawings of the proposed
C^
Grepresentatives
construction must be submitted with this application. The applicants or their
must be present at their scheduled public hearing.
11 hereby certify that I am, or that I represent, the legal owner of the property described above and do hereb bmit this request €er
variance for consideration by the Landscape Board Review. y�� ,-zi_ rye
Date 3 /Iq /OV C R a;EVE
L
Print Name Signature
PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date of Review Board Public Hearing: Taxes, Liens and Assessments Paid? Case umber
um
Yes No oZ� 'C9
Variance Approved:
Date of Final Action:
Fees:
Yes F No
Conditions of Approval:
This request will not be scheduled for hearing
until the application fee is paid.
K4narylLANDSCAPING111-andscape Application.doc 05199
r1
JAI
i
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/24/00
Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Amending Landscape Agenda Number:GN 2000 -041
Regulations Ordinance No. 2423, Relative Landscaping Requires for All Zoning Districts.
Ordinance No. 2473
CASE SUMMARY
City Council at the April 10, 2000 meeting instructed Staff to draft amendments to the
Landscape Regulations requiring all development to meet the minimum standards with the
exception of agricultural uses and single family residences after discovering that
institutional uses in a single family district are not required to meet the requirements. Staff
has drafted the attached proposed language to the Landscape Regulations for your
review.
The Zoning Ordinance allows institutional uses such as public schools, post offices, and
religious facilities to locate in any zoning district in the city including single - family
residential districts. Because of the way some of the city's ordinances are written, these
uses have less stringent development requirements when constructed in single - family
residential districts. Mainly, this is true in the case of landscaping regulations.
A major aspect of the city's landscaping regulations is to buffer residential uses from more
intense uses through the use of screening walls and landscaping buffers. However, the
landscaping regulations do not apply in single - family residential districts. As a result, when
located in a single - family zoning district, institutional uses, such as schools and churches
are not subject to the landscaping requirements.
The proposed language requires all development to meet the minimum standards of the
landscaping regulations with the exception of agricultural uses and single - family
residences. The exception does require all single family and two- family residential
properties to provide a minimum of 3 three -inch caliper trees.
RECOMMENDATION:
To approve Ordinance 2473 and GN 2000 -041 amending the Landscaping
Regulations.
rce of rungs:
Bonds (GO /Rev.)
Operating Budget
De
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Finance Director
1
ead Sig t tt r e City ManagdP§ig nature
\ \NRH CITY_HALL2 \VOL1 \DATA \PZ \Cases \Staff Reports \GN 2000 -000 Inst. Landscape Am Page 1 of 1
� � m
° 3 :p
� � c
1K m
m � �
r NA
c
o P Z
Z � o
K1 A c
N o Z
o A
o ; —
0 � .n
-f
m
d
I
Z
V
ml
73
m
m
f
0
0
0 �
SN 1 9ER STREET
a a
ho
r
APPAiLCTIT ALLEY
V\ —
$ -31-1
p ° m � z D
CIO
A Co -z r.
m m n '► O
A
ORDINANCE NO. 2473
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2423, THE LANDSCAPE
REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TO
REQUIRE ALL DEVELOPMENT IS ALL DISTRICTS TO MEET THE
MINIMUM LANDSCPAE REGULATIONS WITH EXCEPTIONS;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Ordinance Number 2423 was adopted on October 25, 1999 to provide for
the comprehensive regulation of landscaping within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend certain portions of the regulations and to
adopt additional regulations; now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS:
THAT, Section 1, Subsection C.1 "General Criteria" shall be amended to read in its
entirety as follows:
C. General Criteria
1. The standards contained in this Section are considered minimum
standards and shall apply to all zoning districts. Agricultural uses and
single - family residences and their accessory buildings shall be exempt
from the requirements of this Section except as provided in two (2) below.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City
Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance
are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this
ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not
affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or section of this
ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
Ordinance No. 2473
Page 1 of 2
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 2423 shall remain in full force and effect,
save and except as amended by this Ordinance.
IV.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 24 DAY OF APRIL, 2000.
Mayor Charles Scoma
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
I' ATTEST.-
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
5�ejji .11
Dep rtment ead
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY.-
Attorney for the City
Ordinance No. 2473
Page 2 of 2
Pre - Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 3
ITEM
DISCUSSION
ASSIGNMENT
development plans for the area are considered.
Some Council members indicated that they would
support the abandonment of the road, but that the
traffic concerns should be addressed and the
developer would need to work with the citizens in the
surrounding neighborhood.
IR 2000 -048
The City Manager briefly reviewed the status of the
REVIEW STATUS
goals for 1998 and 1999. The Council was advised
OF 1998 & 1999
that the goals set in June 1998 were complete and
COUNCIL GOALS
that 75% of the goals set in June 1999 were
complete. There were no questions from the
Council.
I
IR 2000 -039
Staff advised of the proposed language for the
MARCY
REVIEW AND
amendments to the Sign Ordinance to allow light
Follow -up & return to
DISCUSS
pole banners. The proposed amendment would
City Council for
POSSIBLE
allow light pole banners with a permit for a period not
consideration.
j
AMENDMENTS TO
to exceed 60 days, three permits per year would be
�'1E SIGN
allowed per property, the banners may not exceed
,t,cGULATION
32 square feet in area or extend above the maximum
ORDINANCE NO.
height of the light pole, and the banners may only be
2374 RELATIVE TO
seasonal in nature and not directly advertise a
LIGHT POLE
business or sales event. The Council was in
BANNERS
agreement with the proposed language and the
consensus of the Council was to place the proposed
amendment on a Council agenda for action.
IR 2000 -040
Staff explained that currently when institutional uses
i
MARCY I
REVIEW AND
develop in single - family districts, they are not subject
Follow -up & return to
DISCUSS
to landscaping requirements. The proposed
City Council for
POSSIBLE
amendment will exempt only single family uses from
consideration.
AMENDMENTS TO
the landscaping requirements and will require
THE
institutional uses to be subject to the landscaping
LANDSCAPING
regulations. The consensus of the Council was to
REGULATIONS NO.
place the proposed amendment to the landscaping
2423 RELATIVE TO
regulations on a Council agenda for action.
APPLICABILITY TO
- NONRESIDENTIAL
USES IN
RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICTS
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/24/00
Subject:
Public Hearing to Consider Amending Sign Regulations Agenda Number:GN 2000 -042
Ordinance No. 2374, Relative to Light Pole Banners. Ordinance No. 2474 And
Consider Amending Development Fee Ordinance No. 2451 to Establish a Light Pole
Banner Sign Fee. Ordinance 2475
CASE SUMMARY
City Council at the April 10, 2000 meeting instructed Staff to draft amendments to the Sign
Regulations allowing seasonal light pole banners after reviewing two variance requests on
March 27, 2000. Staff has drafted the attached proposed language to the Sign Regulations
for your review.
In summary, light pole banners would be allowed with a permit for a period not to exceed
60 days. A property would be eligible for three permits in a one -year period. A single
permit may allow several banners. The banners may not exceed 32 square feet in area nor
extend above the maximum height of the light pole. Finally, the message on the banners
may only be seasonal in nature and may not directly advertise a business or sales event.
Additionally, Staff has drafted an amendment to the Development Fee Ordinance No.
2451 to charge a light pole banner sign permit fee of $50, which is exactly the same fee
charged for banner and portable signs.
RECOMMENDATION:
To approve Ordinance No. 2474 and GN 2000 -042 amending the Sign Regulations
and Ordinance No. 2475 Development Fee Ordinance.
urce of Funds:
Bonds (GO /Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
De
Finance Review
Sufficient Funds Available
Finance Director
e City Ma er Signature
LACases \Staff Reports \GN 2000 -000 Light Pole Banners 4- 24.doc Page 1 of 1
ORDINANCE NO. 2474
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2374, THE SIGN
REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TO
PROVIDE REGULATION OF LIGHT POLE BANNER SIGNS;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Ordinance Number 2374 was adopted on March 15, 1999 to provide for
the comprehensive regulation of signage within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend certain portions of the regulations and to
adopt additional regulations; now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS:
THAT, Section 5 "Definitions" shall be amended to add the following definition which
shall read in its entirety as follows:
Light Pole Banner Sign A temporary sign which is painted or printed on a strip of all -
weather cloth, canvas, or other flexible material which is designed or manufactured for
outdoor use mounted on a light pole on private property. The sign material shall be
secured in such a manner to render the sign stationary.
THAT Section 9 "Table of Permitted Signs ", shall be and is hereby amended in its
entirety to provide as follows:
The Table of Permitted Signs, included in this Section, presents the zoning districts
where the locations of signs shall be allowed or prohibited by these regulations. Signs
are listed in accordance with allowable zoning districts shown as shaded areas, and
zoning districts where certain signs are prohibited shown as blank areas.
Ordinance No. 2474
Page 1 of 4
' Multi- family allowed one Wall Sign per street frontage.
Z Company logo flags not allowed in AG, RIS, R1, R2, R3, R41D, R6T, R8, & MH1 districts.
3 Political Signs are regulated as either "AG & R" district signs or "All other district" signs.
4 Electronic Message Boards allowed outside the Freeway Overlay Zone have additional restrictions than
Electronic Message Boards allowed within the Freeway Overlay Zone.
5 See additional restrictions under the Portable Sign regulations.
Ordinance No. 2474
Page 2 of 4
THAT Section 13 "Sign Height, Area, Construction and Placement Standards ", C.
Temporary Signs, shall be and is hereby amended to add 12. Light Pole Banner Signs,
to read in its entirety as follows:
a. A permit shall be required for Light Pole Banner Signs.
b. Light Pole Banner Signs shall be allowed in zoning districts shown in Table 10,
Table of Permitted Signs.
C. A single permit may be issued for multiple Light Pole Banner Signs, a number
which must be specified on the permit application.
d. A Light Pole Banner Sign shall not exceed 32 square feet in size.
e. Light Pole Banner Signs shall not project above the maximum height of the pole.
Light Pole Banner Signs shall be kept in good repair and remain securely
attached in such a manner to withstand wind loads in accordance with the
Uniform Building Code.
g. Light Pole Banner Signs shall not be displayed for a period to exceed 60 days;
nor shall a permit for Light Pole Banner Signs be issued for the same property
more than three times within a one year period.
h. The primary message displayed on Light Pole Banner Signs may be seasonal in
nature and may not directly advertise a business or sale event.
IV.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City
Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance
are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this
ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not
affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or section of this
ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section.
IM
Ordinance No. 2474
Page 3 of 4
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 2374 shall remain in full force and effect,
save and except as amended by this Ordinance.
w
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 24th DAY OF APRIL, 2000.
Mayor Charles Scoma
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
ATTEST.-
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
—/Valw ��&j V.
Depart nt H t ad L 11
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
Ordinance No. 2474
Page 4 of 4
ORDINANCE NO. 2475
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS;
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2451 PROVIDING FOR AN BUILDING PERMIT FEE FOR
LIGHT POLE BANNERS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO HUNDRED ($200.00)
DOLLARS FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Ordinance Number 2451 was adopted on January 24, 2000 to provide for a
comprehensive list of development fees within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend Table 2, Miscellaneous Building Permit
Fees of the ordinance; now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS:
THAT, Section 1, Table 2, "Signs Permit Fees" shall be amended to read in its entirety
as follows:
Signs Permit Fees
1.
Permanent, 1 to 50 square feet in area
$50.00
2.
Permanent, 51 to 100 square feet in area
$100.00
3.
Permanent, 101 to 200 square feet in area
$200.00
4.
Permanent, 201 to 300 square feet in area
$300.00
5.
Permanent, 301 square feet and over (per square foot)
$1.00
6.
Portable sign
$50.00
7.
Banner sign
$50.00
8.
Weekend advertising registration (per year)
$50.00
9.
Light pole banner sign
$50.00
Ordinance No. 2475
Page 1 of 2
DULY PASSED by the City Council of North Richland Hills, Texas, on the 24th day
of April 2000.
APPROVED:
MAYOR
ATTEST
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
BUILDING OFFICIAL
Ordinance No. 2475
Page 2 of 2
ITEM I DISCUSSION
development plans for the area are considered.
Some Council members indicated that they would
support the abandonment of the road, but that the
traffic concerns should be addressed and the
developer would need to work with the citizens in the
surrounding neighborhood.
IR 2000 -048 The City Manager briefly reviewed the status of the
REVIEW STATUS goals for 1998 and 1999. The Council was advised
OF 1998 & 1999 that the goals set in June 1998 were complete and
COUNCIL GOALS that 75% of the goals set in June 1999 were
complete. There were no questions from the
Council.
IR 2000 -039
REVIEW AND
DISCUSS
POSSIBLE
AMENDMENTS TO
THE SIGN
_ CGULATION
ORDINANCE NO.
2374 RELATIVE TO
LIGHT POLE
BANNERS
IR 2000 -040
REVIEW AND
DISCUSS
POSSIBLE
AMENDMENTS TO
THE
LANDSCAPING
REGULATIONS NO
2423 RELATIVE TO
APPLICABILITY TO
.NONRESIDENTIAL
USES IN
RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICTS
Staff advised of the proposed language for the
amendments to the Sign Ordinance to allow light
pole banners. The proposed amendment would
allow light pole banners with a permit for a period not
to exceed 60 days, three permits per year would be
allowed per property, the banners may not exceed
32 square feet in area or extend above the maximum
height of the light pole, and the banners may only be
seasonal in nature and not directly advertise a
business or sales event. The Council was in
agreement with the proposed language and the
consensus of the Council was to place the proposed
amendment on a Council agenda for action.
Staff explained that currently when institutional uses
develop in single - family districts, they are not subject
to landscaping requirements. The proposed
amendment will exempt only single family uses from
the landscaping requirements and will require
institutional uses to be subject to the landscaping
regulations. The consensus of the Council was to
place the proposed amendment to the landscaping
regulations on a Council agenda for action.
Pre - Council Minutes
April 10, 2000
Page 3
ASSIGNMENT
MARCY
Follow -up & return to
City Council for
consideration.
MARCY
Follow -up & return to
City Council for
consideration.
Department: Administration
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Council Meeting Date: 4/24/2000
Subject: Support House Resolution 1876 to Amend the Clean Air Agenda Number: GN 2000 -39
Act - Resolution No. 2000 -28
At the March North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Executive Board
meeting, a resolution was passed in support of several federal legislative initiatives that
effect transportation and the funding of transportation projects. One of the elements
included in NCTCOG's resolution was support for House Resolution 1876 in the United
States Congress to amend the Clean Air Act to include certain specified provisions of the
transportation conformity regulations as in effect March 1, 1999.
Basically, this legislation would reinstate a one -year grace period for newly designated
nonattainment air quality areas. This one -year grace period was ruled invalid by the Circuit
Court on November 4, 1997. In effect, without this grace period, a newly designated
nonattainment area is considered to be in a conformity lapse until conformity is
demonstrated. A conformity lapse anywhere in the State effects transportation funding for
the entire State including suspension of federally funded design and right -of -way
acquisitions and prevention of the advancement of regionally significant non - federally
funded projects. As a result, without the grace period, if a new area in Texas is designated
a nonattainment area it is considered to be nonconforming from the time of designation,
and Texas is in lapse of conformity thereby affecting funding of highway projects
throughout the State.
Through this resolution, the region and the City of North Richland Hills is asking Congress
to reinstate the one -year grace period for newly designated nonattainment areas giving the
State time to develop -a State Implementation Plan (SIP) for any newly designated
nonattainment area. This would provide the time needed to develop a plan to meet
conformity. Such time would work to avoid the possibility of a conformity lapse.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Resolution No. 2000 -28.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO /Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Department Head Signature
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Finance Director
or
City Mana r Signature
Page 1 of
RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -28
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING HOUSE RESOLUTION 1876 IN THE UNITED
STATES CONGRESS TO AMEND THE CLEAN AIR ACT
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills is a member of the Regional
Transportation Council (RTC); and,
WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Council serving as the Metropolitan
Planning Organization for the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG),
is responsible for the long -range transportation plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Council is responsible for air quality
conformity; and,
WHEREAS, the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 require that in air
quality nonattainment areas transportation plans and improvement programs conform to
the applicable air quality implementation plan; and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 1997, the Circuit Court ruled against the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), invalidating the one -year grace period
provision of the conformity regulations which provided a one -year grace period before
newly designated non - attainment areas were subject to conformity; and,
WHEREAS, newly designated non - attainment areas must now contend with
conformity upon designation and these newly designated non - attainment areas will be
in a conformity lapse until conformity is demonstrated; and,
WHEREAS, House Resolution 1876 and Senate Bill 1053 were introduced in the
United States Congress in May 1999 to reinstate the grace period for newly designated
areas that have proven that good faith efforts are underway, and reinstate full
grandfathering in all nonattainment areas that have also proven that good faith efforts
are underway; and
WHEREAS, if the state designates new nonattainment areas, the City of North
Richland Hills in cooperation with the region is asking Congress to give the State the
time to develop a State Implementation Plan, which would provide the time needed for
the Metropolitan Planning Organization to develop a plan to meet conformity; and,
WHEREAS, a conformity lapse would cause a suspension of federally funded
design and right -of -way acquisitions, prevent advancement of regionally significant non -
federally funded projects by state and local transportation agencies and prevent federal
agencies from completing NEPA actions on non - exempt projects; and,
WHEREAS, the State, in cooperation with the region and the cities in the region,
is working to avoid the possibility of a conformity lapse;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the
City of North Richland Hills that:
The City of North Richland Hills supports House Resolution 1867 and the
companion Senate Bill 1053 to amend the Clean Air Act to incorporate specified
provisions of transportation conformity regulations as in effect March 1, 1999; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mayor and City Council of North Richland
Hills that this resolution shall be sent to Representative Frost, Representative Granger
and Representative Barton in the United States House of Representatives, and Senator
Gramm and Senator Hutchison in the United States Senate.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of April 2000.
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson — City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
Rex McEntire — Attorney for the City
i!
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma — Mayor
Department: Administration
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Council Meeting Date: 4/24/2000
Subject: Encourage Congressional Review of the Transportation Agenda Number: GN 2000 -40
Equity Act of the 21't Century (TEA -21) Rate of Funding
Return for the State of Texas — Resolution No. 2000 -29
At the March North Central Texas Council of Governments ( NCTCOG) Executive Board
meeting, a resolution was passed in support of several federal legislative initiatives that
effect transportation and the funding of transportation projects. One of the elements
included in NCTCOG's resolution was to encourage Congress to review the rate of return
for Texas for formula funding under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21St Century
(TEA -21).
TEA -21 guarantees 90.5 cents on the dollar return of formula funds to all states. However,
Texas ranks 34th in the allocation of discretionary funds received from the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA). In addition, reports indicate that Texas has received only a small
portion of funding from the National Corridor Planning and Development Program and the
Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program.
Since North Richland Hills utilizes TEA -21 and other such funds received through
NCTCOG for transportation and infrastructure projects, a Congressional review of the
TEA -21 rate of return to Texas could affect our City. Such a review might possibly work to
benefit our City to the extent that the review results in an increase in the allocation of funds
to the State of Texas. The attached resolution encourages Congress to review the TEA -21
rate of return for Texas to ensure Texas is receiving its guaranteed rate of return for
funding, and is receiving its proportional share of the National Corridor Planning and
Development Program and Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program funds.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Resolution No. 2000 -29.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO /Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Departme t Head Signature
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Director
G
City Manags0,Signature
Page 1 of I
RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -29
A RESOLUTION ENCOURAGING CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF THE
TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
WHEREAS, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21St Century (TEA 21)
guaranteed 90.5 cents on the dollar return of formula funds to all states as well as a
proportional share of National Corridor Planning and Development Program funds and
Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program funds; and,
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills submits applications for TEA 21
funds and other funds for transportation projects to the North Central Texas Council of
Governments ( NCTCOG); and,
WHEREAS, the NCTCOG has been designated as the Metropolitan Planning
Organization for the Dallas -Fort Worth Metropolitan Area by the Governor of Texas in
accordance with Federal law; and,
WHEREAS, the NCTCOG submits applications for funding under the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Borders and Corridors Program; and,
WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) serving as the
Metropolitan Planning Organization for North Central Texas, is responsible for the long -
range transportation plan. The long -rang transportation plan, Mobility 2025, is required
by law to be financially constrained and increasing revenue is critical in meeting this
constraint;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the
City of North Richland Hills that:
The City of North Richland Hills encourages Congress to review the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21St Century (TEA 21) Rate of Return for Texas to
ensure Texas is receiving its guaranteed rate of return for funding and receiving its
proportional share of the National Corridor Planning and Development Program and
Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program funds; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mayor and City Council of North Richland
Hills that this resolution shall be sent to Representative Frost, Representative Granger
and Representative Barton in the United States House of Representatives, and Senator
Gramm and Senator Hutchison in the United States Senate.
1
PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of April 2000.
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson — City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
Rex McEntire — Attorney for the City
2
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma — Mayor
Page 1 of 1
Information & Reports April 24, 2000
1. Announcements
Saturday May 6th 7:00 AM - 7:00 PM
➢ BISD Election of Board of Trustees
Voting Locations:
City Hall, 7301 NE Loop 820
Dan Echols Senior Center, 6801 Glenview Drive
Bursey Road Senior Center, 7301 Bursey Road
Saturday May 6th
➢ 5th Annual Paws for the Cause Walk -a -thon & Adopt -a -thon
9 :00 AM 7200 -B Dick Fisher Drive South
For information call 427 -6570
2. Information
➢ Corporate Challenge 2000
Opening Ceremonies - Saturday April 29th 5:00 PM
NRH Recreation Center, all are welcome
10 different companies and organizations are participating in
Various Sports Competitions through May 13th
For information call Bob Hagin at 427 -6602
➢ Registration for Summer Recreation Programs begins Monday
May 1St
Call the Recreation Center at 427 -6600 for more information
➢ The City Council will conduct its annual goals setting workshop
Friday April 28th & Saturday April 29th
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ADDITION TO CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA
APRIL 28 & 29, 2000
The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills will hold an Executive Session
during the Goal Setting Work Session on April 29, 2000 at Hilton DFW Lakes,
1800 Highway 26 East, Grapevine, Texas. The City Council will convene into
`Executive Session at 3:30 p.m. to discuss the following:
A. Personnel as authorized by Section 551.074 of the Government Code.
Council Appointed Positions
City Secretary
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any
action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session.
y -a& 00
Date
3:/5 u -M-
Ttmb
City Secretary
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA
APRIL 28 & 29, 2000
The City Council of the City of North Richland Hills will hold a Goal Setting Work
Session on April 28 & 29, 2000 at Hilton DFW Lakes, 1800 Highway 26 East,
Grapevine, Texas. The work session will begin on April 28, 2000 at 5:00 p.m.
and will conclude the afternoon of April 29, 2000.
Agenda:
1. Discussion and Setting of Goals
City Secretary