Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 2000-04-10 Agendas Y I Uill ,'. "- uu CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS --.-.--.---------~-.- PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 10, 2000 - 5:30 PM ") . ~,.._. ·-_.·.~_·_"~A_.·A._·......~.. ¡ /' 3 () .(w' _.....,-,.-...'~-"' <._,........_~.-- ,.-. . . .... ........ For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall - Pre-Cou£ç~ Cham,bers 7301 Northeast Loop 820. '. ' ... ¡} þ~ 0-<-) \l, ?{. (,VÍ' _""~'".~.. A~.·,_. _....". . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Discuss Items from Regular April 10, 2000 City Council Meetinq (5 Minutes) 2. I R 2000-047 Discuss Possible Dates for Annual Goals Workshop (5 Minutes) 3. I R 2000-043 Set Date for Work Session on Crime Control District Planning (5 Minutes) 4. I R 2000-044 Discuss Possible North Richland Hills Leadership Seminar (Mavor Scoma) (10 Minutes) 5. I R 2000-045 Discuss the Request to Abandon a Portion of Shady Grove Road between Davis Boulevard and Precinct Line Road (10 Minutes) . 6. I R 2000-048 Review Status of 1998 & 1999 Council Goals (10 Minutes) 7. I R 2000-039 Review and Discuss Possible Amendments to the Sign Regulation Ordinance No. 2374 Relative to Light Pole Banners (10 Minutes) 8. I R 2000-040 Review and Discuss Possible Amendments to the . Landscaping Regulations No; 2423 Relative to Applicability to Nonresidential Uses in Residential Districts (10 Minutes) Discussion on Amending Tax Abatement Ordinanceto 9. I R 2000-041 Consider PersOnal Property Taxes (10 Minutes) 10. *Executive Session - The Council may enter into closed executive Session to discuss the following: Personnel as authorized by Section §551.074 of the Government Code - Review of Council Appointed Positions (10 Minutes) 11. Adiournment - 6:50 pm *Closed due to subject matter as provide by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 10, 2000 - 7:00 PM For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:00 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items on the consent agenda will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 427-6060 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation - 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Special Presentations a.) Proclamation - Volunteer Week Ed Lesser b.) Recognition of North Richland Hills Volunteer of the Year- Leo Tucker 5. Removal of Item( s) from the Consent Agenda 6. a. Minutes of the Pre-Council Meeting March 27, 2000 b. Minutes of the Council Meeting March 27,2000 GN 2000-36 c. Certification of Unopposed Candidates and Declaring Unopposed Candidates Elected to Office - Ordinance No. 2466 GN 2000-37 d. Authorize the Publication of Notice of Intent to Issue Certificates of Obligation - Resolution No. 2000-26 PU 2000-23 e. Award Bid for Video Equipment to CMS/MCSI in the Amount of $37,566 PU 2000-24 f. Authorize Participation in the Tarrant County Cooperative Purchasing Program for the Street Wedge Milling Project PU 2000-25 g. Authorize Participation in State Department of Information Resources Cooperative Purchasing Program for Network Communication Equipment Maintenance PW 2000-11 h. Big Fossil Creek Watershed Flood Damage Reduction Study - Resolution No. 2000-25 7. PZ 99-36 Appeal Public Hearing to Reconsider Amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1874 to Add Article 12, Neighborhood Parkland Dedication Requirements - Ordinance No. 2455 (Denied at the February 28 City Council Meetinq) 8. PZ 2000-07 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of KPA Consulting for a Special Use Permit on Lot 4R, Block 4, Brentwood Estates to Allow an Automobile Lubrication Center and Minor Auto Repair in a C-1, Commercial District. Located at 8401 Davis Boulevard - Ordinance No. 2470 9. PZ 2000-08 10. PZ 2000-11 11 . PZ 2000-09 12. PS 2000-06 13. PZ 2000-10 Request of GSBS Batenhorst for Site Plan Approval of Commercial Development within 200 feet of Residential Property on Lot 1, Block 1, Brentwood Estates Addition. The Property is Located at the Northwest Intersection of Shady Grove Road and Davis Blvd. Public Hearing to Consider the Request of GSBS Batenhorst for a Special Use Permit to Allow Exterior Materials other than Masonry on a Proposed Bank Building on Proposed Lot 1 , Block 1, Brentwood Estates Addition. The Property is located at the Northwest Corner of Davis Blvd & Shady Grove Rd. Ordinance No. 2468 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Doskocil Food Service Companies for a Special Use Permit to Allow Exterior Materials Other than Masonry on an Addition to an Existing Facility on Lot AR-1, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition in an 12-lndustrial District. The property is Located at 6350 Browninq Ct - Ordinance No. 2467 Consider Request of Teague, Nail & Perkins, Inc., for a Replat to be known as Lot A-R 1 , Block 3, Industrial Park Addition. The property is Located at the Southwest Intersection of WuliQer Way & Brownina Court. Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Dunaway Associates, Inc. for a Zoning Change on Lot 1, Block 1, Shady Grove Baptist Church from U-Institutional to C1-Commercial and Several Tracts in the Thomas Peck Survey, Abstract No. 1210 on the North Side of Shady Grove Road from AG-Agricultural to C1- Commercial (Located at 8241 Precinct Line Road and 8700 Block of Shady Grove Road) Ordinance No. 2471. 14. PZ 2000-12 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Joe Dorris to Amend the Approved Special Use Permit (Ordinance No. 2254) for a Contractors Office with Garage in a C2 -Commercial Zoning District on a Lot 1 RA, Block 33, College Hills Addition. The Property is Located at 5949 Davis Boulevard. Ordinance No. 2472. 15. PZ 2000-13 Public Hearing to consider the request of ASG Northwood Plaza, L TD, for a Zoning Change on Lot 2R, Block 2, Snow Heights North Addition from C1-Commercial to C2- Commercial. This property is located at 6805 N. E. Loop 820. Ordinance No. 2469 16.PS 99-16 Consider Request of Christopher Jones for a Replat to be known as Lots 2R, 3 & 4, Block 1, Davis North Tarrant County Parkway Addition. The Property is Located at the Southeast Intersection of Davis Blvd & North Tarrant Parkway. 17. PS 2000-04 Consider Request of Jim Makens for a Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Gibson Addition. (Property Located in the Northeast Intersection of Precinct Line Road and is addressed as 8616 Davis Boulevard) 18. GN 2000-38 Interlocal Agreement with the Regional Transportation Council for Development and Operation of Commuter Rail Service - Resolution No. 2000-10 19. a) Citizens Presentation b) I nformation and Reports 120. I Adjournment I I ~ 1 (ôú ·.~o .,..___.._._.__. Ir, ) 0 UV'1 ~_..."."'~"~ ....,....,.--...- "".,.-,..-'-'-',,-, . ~~ c..' / ,.~',.: .,. -..:"f \-/ . ,":'0',' ':." ~V:/A'j ~.~ INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 00-047 "'-- ~ Date. April 1 0, 2000 T 5Ubl~ct: Discuss Possible Dates for Goals Workshop In trying to set a date for the annual goals setting workshop, several Council members have indicated conflicts with the dates suggested thus far. Staff has contacted Lyle Sumek's office and has received some additional dates when he is available. These dates are: May 9th & 10th Tuesday & Wednesday May 16th & 17th Tuesday & Wednesday May 1ih & 13th Friday & Saturday May 19th & 20th Friday & Saturday It would be helpful for everyone to bring their calendars to the Pre Council meeting so we can look at these dates together and establish a time for the goals setting workshop so staff can get back with Lyle Sumek's office to confirm. Respectfully submitted, L~~~ City Manager '- ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORTTO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 2000-043 ~ Date: April 4, 2000 T Subject: Crime Control District Worksession In preparation for the referendum on the Crime Control District (CCD) in February of 2001 , it is recommended that a City Council work session be scheduled sometime during the next two months. This session will provide staff an opportunity to brief the Council on significant issues rèlating to this program. We would like to briefly review the original plan, outline the accomplishments that haye been recognized as a result of the implementation and present our recommendations for the continuation of the District. In addition, we are also interested in input from the City Council on matters related to the Crime Control District. We are preparing the presentation at this time and would like to recommend a date in the latter part of April or sometime in May. It is anticipated that two hours will be sufficient to cover these items and questions relating to the CCD. Depending on Council availability, this worksession could be held prior to the regular council meeting on April 24th, May 8th or May 22"d. Other possible evening dates with no known conflicts are: April 25 or 26 May 1 - 4 May 9 - 11 May 15 - 17 May 23 - 25 Please bring your calendars as we will try to determine a date that will work for all Cquncil members. Respectfu IIy, Randy Shiflet Deputy City Manager ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS IN FORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AN D CITY COUNCIL No. IR 00-044 '~ ~ Date: April 10. 2000 -y Subject: Possible NRH Leadership Seminar Mayor Scoma has requested that this item be placed on the Pre-Council agenda so he can discuss with Council the possibility of haYing some type of Town Hall meeting or other type of gathering to invite citizens who want to have an opportunity to get involved in local government. It is our understanding that Mayor Scoma wants to see ways in which we could broaden citizen participation and perhaps look at some type of effort to inform interested citizens about various boards and commissions, City Council responsibilities and possible leadership opportunities. At the Pre-Council meeting he will be discussing with you some of his ideas and I know he will be interested in any suggestions you might have about the feasibility of such an effort to involve citizens who are interested in serving in different public capacities. Respectfully submitted, CfMo"ð~ LarryJ. Cunningham rr/.¥" ,,: ,"",-,' \.- ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS '" ." ~ ~. INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL NoJR 2000-045 ~ Date: T Subject: April 10, 2000 Discuss the Request to Abandon a Portion of Shady Grove Road Between Davis Boulevard and Precinct Line Road Mr. Tom Galbreath of Dunaway Associates has requested to give City Council a report on the request to abandon the portion of Shady Grove Road between Davis Boulevard and Precinct Line Road for the future development of a Wal Mart. Currently, Wal Mart has a contract on all the property fronting the north and south side of Shady· Grove Road "from Davis Boulevard to Precinct Line Road. The abandonm~nt of that portion of Shady Grove Road is necessary because the proposed building will be located on the roadway. Staff has been working diligently with Mr. Galbreath on his zoning change request, the road abandonment and the preliminary and final plat of the property. There are six adjacent property owners who have signed a petition to vacate Shady Grove Road. Two of the those property owners have residences adjacent to Shady Gro~e.. Staff has been working with the applicant to coordinate the timing of the abandonmentrequest, public safety concerns for police and fire and the removal of the homes. Mr. Galbreath requested to speak to you to let you know the issues they are dealing with and to see if Council has any issues or concerns with the request to abandon that portion of Shady Grove Road. ~:;~~ Planning Director \\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1\DATA\PZ\Cases\Staff Reports\IR 2000-045 Vacation of Shady Grove Road 4-10.doc Page 1 of 1 ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 00-048 '-... ~ Date April 10, 2000 T SUbi:ct: Status of Council Goals The information provided in this report provides an update on the status of the goals and action items as set forth by the City Council at the goals retreats in June 1998 and June 1999. This information is provided in anticipation and preparation for the upcoming goals setting retreat. Attached you will find spreadsheets listing the goals and action items set in June, 1998 as well as a sheet listing the goals and action items established at the June, 1999 retreat. As you can see, the goals established in June, 1998 have been completed. Some of the action items set forth at the June, 1999 retreat have been completed, others are in progress with most scheduled to be complete by the end of 2000 if not sooner. We look forward to reviewing this information with you Monday, and receiving any input you might have on these items. Respectfully submitted, '-- Æ C~ Randy Shiflet Deputy City Manager ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS o o o N -- ...J - ro è'i5 !!2 ro o <.9 '(3 C :J o U ...... C o :¡:; ro 'E (]) E (]) ëi E en ::J I- <C 1-"0 en (]) - (]) ëi E o U zct) Oo~ w-"- 1-1- <c~i- :¡:£1.ro -:¡:2 tñoi3 WULL ..; (]) "0 ès (]) > :¡:; ro '- :m >- .!: C) E W"O 1-« <c"O 0:: (]) I- .~ en (]) u (]) 0::: ct) 0) -- o ..- -- N « 0.. W £ .~ :¡: W t::::0) z c: o ::J ~o:: U<c <C£1. W <i. ... (.) c: Q 0 ...J '0;:: <c ... IIJ O£1.'E 1ft ... Q \wi Q E ~ Q Q - enQ. .....5 "0 (]) - (]) ëi E o U 0) 0) 0) >. ro :2 - (]) :2 c: IIJ ii: ~ oð ãi c: .... E 0) Q ëii ~ > Q .- 0 00'" .- Q. . ... E m£1._ (]) en ro J::. a. - '- en ~.8:Q z(]).D . .!Q C "01::0 (])(]):¡:; §-ðg o.ro-Þ E 0 en 0- C U .!Q 8 0) 0) 0) ..- >. ro :2 c: ~ a. o𠧡N .- >- en_ Q .~ o 0 .~ U£1. o o o N ":('1') (])o .Do EN (]) - - - a. .¡: (]) a. Cf)« ..- N (]) (]) en en ro ro J::. J::. 0..0.. .. .. c: III 0 ...; c: (.) Q ::J E ... Q '" > III o c: ... 0 U .50 "0 "0 (]) (]) - - (]) (]) ëiëi E E o 0 UU 0) 0) 0) 0)..- 0) ..: 0) (]) "-.D >'.8 ro u :20 en '(is t5~ ~ ~ o ro u"o "0 C C ro ro ~ (])- 'S C .DW E C'O .~ 16 00 .. .. c: Q N ;:: ëj ... (.) ::J "C c: >- o Q U è= <i. ~ E Q ... c: ~~ en a. .:.:: ... ... Q IIJ'" a. g¡ N:¡: "0"0"0"0"0"0"0 (]) (]) (]) (]) (]) (]) (]) ........ ........ ........ ...... ...... ....... ...... (]) (]) (]) (]) (]) (]) (]) ëiëiëiëiëiëiëi E E E E E E E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 UUUUUUU 0)000 0)000 ct)0)000 ~ct)O)"-NNN 0)0)---- ~~..-Q3 ~~ -.D ro ro ro ':-""':(])O:J:J:J '-roc-ccc ~:2~8~~~ (]) (]) :::: 'E ro § E J::. ëi5 o en u C ~ OJ ~ .:.:: c.8 '- C .~ en OJ 'g ~ .~ (]) o.§ :J û) :Jo (]) 0 '(3 '(3 J::.,-(])cUC~ .!Q <.9 E ~ _0 6 15 ~ .!:2 ';"0 U 'g $u15roc>-,:J en 0 :J '- (]) :::: 0 WLLo..OCf)UU ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . Q Q ... ;:: :!:: IIJ E ... E o 0 Q. U o ã)>-~ ~ ,Q .~ o æ $ . - ... m£1.en '(j c: c: ::J~ 8£1. >-~ :!:: Q U 'S; .Q uo:: en en (]) '- OJ e 0.. c o o o N i- ro :J '- .D (]) LL c: o ;:: IIJ ... c: Q E ..2!:= Q.IIJ E'" _en .>- O,Q en - C (])"O E (]) (]) :J > en o en '- .- c a.~ E E .!Q ~ ~.§ 2 - t5 en ~ g> 2 en 0..- _ ~ E 0 en oOJC:o U § 8 '- 0) ~g '<to "ON æ i- ct) ro ~ ~ N ro ..- -, OJ "0 ã5 en "0 '- ro 5 ~ (]) E o OJ 'E o :2t5 (]) (])'Q > '- o a. Q.(]) Eg> w£ "0 ro ~-o ~ .!: ::> c o .Q - - _ ro .- a. E '(3 ~t ro 'Eo. ~~ <.9U .. .. J::. ... .~ Qj .:.::Q. ... 0 Oã) 3: > .Q <co 13 c: .!!! 0 £1.~ "C Q c: .!:: ~o J::. ... (.) Q æ'E Q MU "0 "0 (]) (]) - - (]) (]) ëiëi E E o 0 Uü ct) 0) 0) ..- oct) ~O) roO) :J"- '- .D~ (]) :J LL-, "0 LL C ¡:: ro ..... (]) 0:; >-,"0 :::: (]) = J::. .D u ëi5 Cf) æ!:!:: LLI- .. .. c: o ;:: (.) Q ... c 'ü c: :J o U ai "0"0"0 (]) (]) (]) - -- (]) (]) (]) ëiëiëi E E E 000 UUU ct) 0) 0)0 ct)..-o 0) _0 O)Q3N ..- .D i- J::. E ro u (]) :J '- U C ,£g O(]) ro ..::: -, f'-. ..... o C o :¡:; ro - C (]) E (]) ëi E OJ C .¡: (]) (]) C OJ C (]) "0 c_ ro u C .92., OJO en '(is Il: "O~(]) C _ o (]) (]) co .~ ëi (]) ro E ro .!: 0 Cf)LLU (]) OJ ro 0.. .. .. .. Q 0) IIJ c: ëã ... o III III Q ... "C "c Q <c ~ c..:i.!!! o o o N -- -.t (/) :J - CO û5 (/) ëõ o (!) '(3 c: :J o Ü z ::5 a.. z o ¡:::: « I- Z W ::;?; W ....J a.. ::;?; 'tJ 0) 'tJ c: c..J 0) co æ 0) ~g':§~~ ~ E 'ã, 0 co -g .c: 0) -g ~ E~c:~.!!! g>~ 1:5 I- 0 (/) 0 0) 0) 0 .- 0) <t ~ -g ~ :2 ,2= 'tJ :5 ~ ã) t; 'tJ ~ .!!! ~ ~ ~ 2 'tJ 0 '(3 'tJ ~ ~~§,~8~~~ü§~~ _a. E ,- '- 0) ~ a. - c..Jo 0 - :J (/)o.Do.:Jo. üo.(/) EE~O) Ec:EI Ec: o 0 0) 0) :> 0 co 0 'tJ ,- 0 0 ÜÜC:.Þ::>c..J"ã.ü«üüü 0) 0) 0) "'-0 .:8 ~N E a') 0) c: c..J 'C 0) a. OC/) zco 000) W-O) I-~"'- c(..Ja3 ::EIl.E ¡:::::EE Cl)0:J wUC/) c: OJ o c: .......õ. :J co o.c..J c: (/) ~'tJ 0) c: O).!!! (/) o 0) - (/) 0) :J >-2-g C):':.!!! w E I-Eouj ~ 8 §,$ I-c:c:- CI) 0) co co ,_t:::! '- E 'tJ'tJ '(3 co 0) O)eêij (/)Dã) co 0 '- D_,- 'tJ'tJ0) coO).c: 0-- '- co 0 Dã)'tJ - '- c: ,S (/) co o 0) o.:JC: a.(/) OJ « .!!l ëñ ::E" w æ ~...J Z c: c..J 000> I-Q c: J: ~ o :!:: U .- " E <t .!!! <t E c..J 0> 0> (/) 0 o:)u <i. c: 10 ã: ...Jo>__ 0> <to(/)C: g :)OC)ro C) " ïii .5 c: c: 'S; c: " 10 0> 0 ... ...JO::NO ....: o o o N OJ c: 'C a. C/) 'tJ c: co - c..J 0) '0 '- a.. '- 0) - c: 0) Ü c: ~ o I- .c: - (/) '3: c: o c::.;:; o co :¡:¡'tJ c..J c: c: 0) :J E "CE o 0 c..J U .S ~ '- 0) 0) 'tJ (/) ëñ :J c:'tJ o c: u.!!! >- 10 1: 0> > o (/) (/) 0> (/) ... 0> " c: " 0 <tN I:C co 0) 0) ...- .: 0) D o 1:5 o (/) 0) OJ '- co .c: ü (/) 0) > :¡:¡ u 0) B o en 0) c: ã) :2 :J (!) .c: ,!!l :õ co - (/) UJ ~ (/) (/) 0> (,) o ... ~ Il. 0> .~ .~ ião:: c: ... i:i:.E u 0) - co "0 a. :J "5 c: O.!!! >-a.. .!!! 0) "0 (/) c::J co "0 (/) c: ~ co O)....J 'S; 0) 0) > '- '00 0) c: '- 0) 2.c: U 0) Æa. .c: E ~ 0 «ü .. ~ (/) ... oð~ 0> 10 (/)::E :)" " 0> c:iü jQj ...0:: 0> C) :5 c: 0'2 . 0 ON (/)(/)"0 (/) (/) 0) 0)0)- '- '- 0) OJ OJ_ o 0 a. '- '- E a.. a.. 0 c:c:ü 0) 0) 0) 0"'- 8 .: N~ a')E c: 0) 'C U 0.0) C/)O 0) - co 0)'tJ êijo. 'tJ :J o.C: :J .Q c:êij .!!!-s a.. OJ ~ ~ co c: :E .Q OJ .!!l :J > e:a OD .c: :J I-C/) ~ ~ OJ c: "0 c: 0) a.. "0 0) - 0) "ã. E o ü (/) "0 '- co "0 c: co - (/) c: OJ '00 0) "0 0) (/) co 0) '- U c: ~ 'tJ 0) ã) "ã. E o ü 'tJ 0) - 0) "ã. E o U o o o N OJ c: 'C a. C/) 0) 0) 0) ...- .c: U '- co ::;?; 'tJ 0) - 0) "ã. E o ü 0) 0) 0) ...- 0) 0) 0) ...- 0) 0) 0) ...- .: 0) D E 0) > o Z c: o '00 '(3 0) "0 '- ,E '(3 c: :J o ü .8 - 'E D :J C/) ~ .c: c..J '- co ::;?; .c: U '- co ::;?; OJ c: :¡:¡ (/) "0 'x c: 0) co '- c:(/),E OJ 0) 0) '00 (/) U c: (/) c: o ~ ê (/) .- :a c:OJ~'- o .S D 0 ~ro~O) 0) _0)0)0. U C:.c:c:~ æ 0) U '- (/) c: æ~:õ,E-g :a E g-5.~.!!! (5 E'-_C:"O c: E '(3 g ê æ g 8§-g'êc: co O)oooOJ ~ .c: U U 0) '00 ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~g: a. (/) (/) (/) (/) c: §- 13 ~ -g ~ '00 æ C/)a..a...!!!a..,g¡.:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¿ .~.s; .5 ~ ~ ~ .2' õ&~æ t::!::EQ,~O> Il. _ ~ " 0> Cl)0> 0 g .c:ro-c: EE ~ro (/):J Q,ro E Q,o Q,O> c: ~ §.2èñ ~.2U.2~:a ro<t~C:'"i'O>~O>(,)è5 Vi ... 0> .2' 1:: ~ .!!! ~ (/) Woo(/)oo>o"c: .~ .o>.c:.o> c:c) W <toCl)l:Co::ujëñ - c: ... ~ 0> .EC:E (/) Ë g- "E Q,- c: 10 0 0> C)'tJ - > .- c: 0> 0> (/)10>" 0>-0>0> OCl)OO:: N (/) (/) ~ OJ 0.0.0 '- a.. c: "0 'tJ 0) 0) - - ~~ E E o 0 üü 0) 0) 0»0 0)00 ...-DO - co N Ci5ü DNg' .8 0) 'C UO)o. OC/)C/) 0) > '00 c: 0) 0) >.c: o 0) Da. co E ü 0 .S ~ ~ "0 0 0) 0) 0) 'S; ~ êij ~ ~R~ "0 :J :J "0 _ co c: U 0) 0)~Æ2 ~~-5=E c: :J «'- E ,Q>(3 (/) c: 'tJ 0 c: U "0 'ä; co 'tJ æDc:2 OJococ: ,s -;;; ã: 'õ 0.'- 0) a. co:>,(/)¡¡f ~ g>:J "0 - "0 '(3 c: ~ c: c: jû5jð u ~ ~ " ... 10 > .9! c: :J o ° ïii I:C .- (/) (,) .- 0> > o 10 ,0 o 'tJ 0) - 0) "ã. E o ü co 0) 0) ...- +oJ (/) :J OJ :J « ~ (,) o 0>J: "" 0<t u_ c: c: .2 O>E a¡ (/) - '¡j ~ :!:: 0> ... E o.EE . c: ° <twu -" c: c: 0> 10 E c: 0> 0 O>~~>- " .E 0> .~ o c: .: 0 UWOIl. M 'tJ 'tJ 'tJ 0) 0) 0) ã)ã)ã) "ã."ã.Ci E E E 000 uuu coco co 0)0)0) 0)0)0) ...- ...- ...- ~ ...: ~- 0) 0) 0) DDD E E E 0) 0) 0) U U U 0) 0) 0) 000 c: '- 0) U c: o U 'tJ c: co ûí 0) '- 0) - .s .g-E '(3 0) 0) E 0.0) (/) U ..... '- o 0 (/)..... co c: 0) 0) '- 0 co- (/) 0) '(3 co 0) cc:E ð g E U c..J E --0)0 ~~U (/) c: g G$I ,!!l D 'tJ 00« ~ ~ ~ (/) E 0> ::ë ° (/) ... c: Il. ... ~~ .. c: c: 0 0> (,) 32" I:C æ 'tJ c: co (/) c: ,Q êij 'tJ c: 0) E E o ~ '(3 '- c: (/) :J OJO ,s U -g:,: ¡;:U o - 'tJ 0) C 0) (/) 0) '- a. t o a. 0) '- f'- ..... o N 0) OJ co a.. o o o N -- "<t en ;:, - ro èÏ5 en (/) a>:ß ::> "O~ I- 0 < U I- ~ (/)~~I:: __ro a> a> I:: a. a. 2 E E ,ç: o 0 ro üü~ zO)O)O cOO)O)o w¡::~~~ I-w -.:.: < ..J Q5 a> a> ~e.EEE I-O..::EEE (/) ;:,;:,;:, wUU)U)U) en ro o <.!) '(3 I:: ;:, o Ü Z <{ ..J c... Z o ~ I- Z W ~ W ...J c... ~ >- en C) ~ W '(3 ~~Q5a> 0::0£"0 t;:¡::;og 'õ I:: a> I:: ,- o en U U "E æ o>rol:: I:: "0 a> ~æ:5 'x (j) ro a> J:: E 2e:>. ro ro 1:: ..2 (]) a> ~ :ß ê wD:::c... .. .. .. :!E w t:: ... Q).S! z"O... o 0 e: ¡:::uQ) U Q) E <.= ~ .... ... ~O:I: . 'E 0:: uwz ..J < o C) o ~ 0. ,ç: "0 "0 "0 J::222 U a> (]) a> (¡¡a.a.a. a> E E E en 0 0 0 ~üüü 0)0)0) 0)0)0) 0)0)0) ..... ..... ..... L....'" ~ ~ a> (]) a> - -- I:: I:: I:: ~~~ I:: o ~ a> ~ "0 "0 I:: ro :>.en ü"O ,- ~ - ro 0"0 0.1:: J:: ro en- = en .c a> ro- U5 "¡:: wš: .. .. .. en Q) :§ ~ õ æ 0.."0 J:: æ .!!! ... :c(/) Q) ~ .~ eniij W e: ciü: ~ ~ o ~ en en "0 a> a> ë:"O ;:, æ a> I:: - a> I:: - 0 0. ._ E en o en Ü ~ 00 00 00 NN r..:s;.: a> a> E E E E ;:, ;:, U)U) en "0 (]) (]) I:: 0> I:: !E ro - en (]) - ro ;:, ro > w - I:: a> '(3 E I:: a> ð ü ü æ Þ"É ü a> £ 'i '§ ,~ I:: a> o ~ ïñ a> en U a> I:: en ro ~ I:: o"E Š:O .. .. en e: o IJÎ ëii "0 '(3 ... Q) ca c"g ca en '(3 ... Q) e: (/) !:! ;:, >. ::s 8g~ . 0 Q) wo..o:: "0 a> ã5 a. E o Ü "0 a> "0 a> a> I:: en ro a> - "0 ro a> ;:, ã5ro a.ã) E 8~ 0) 0) 0) ..... .: a> - I:: ~ I:: .Q t3 <{ '(3 I:: ;:, o Ü '+- o I:: o :¡::; ro - I:: (]) E (]) a. E a> Æ en £ - ro en (]) I:: o N :>. ro "t: a> > o o Z e: o .. ca ... e: Q) E Q) õ.. .5 u.: "0 e: :>.ca ca e: -¡: .2 Q)... > ca O.::! ~ ~ Q,W e: E 0 ::s en ëii :!E ~ 'ü . 0 Q) <NC ... Q) ... e: e: Q) 0 U.. e: U := ~ o .- I-C ..t :>. ro 2: a> "0 I:: ;:, en en a> ü "0 e 20. ~o> 0.1:: EE o~ üc... co 0) 0) ..... .: (]) .c o - ü o en e: ~ 0.. iij e: u. .~ ~ ~èñ 0::"0 aJ æ "0"0"0 a> a> a> - -- a> (]) a> a. a. a. E E E 000 üüü co 0) co co 0) 0)0)..... 0)0) _ ..........~ .: .:.8 a> a> E .c.ca> .8.8ü ü ü (]) 000 en ~ ~ ro c... oð Ñ oð c... '(3 I:: ;:'N °oð üc... .8"0 "0 I:: a> ro - ~ '(3 E I:: .c ð ¡j;ü -ð'~ ;:, I:: - 0 en ._ Þ~ :c ~ ëñ ~ ro 0 ~š: "0"0"0"0"0"0"0"0"0"0"0 a> a> a> a> (]) a> a> a> a> a> a> ................................................................. a>a>a>a>(])a>a>a>~~~ a.a.a.a.a.a.a.-o.o.o. E E E E E E E E E E E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 üüüüüüüüüüü 0)0)0)0) 0)0)0)0) 0)0)0)0)0)0)0) ....................0)0)0)000 .:.: - -0)0)0)000 0)a>a>Q5Q5...............000 O).c.c.c.c - . -NNN ~EEEEQ5Q5Q5Ò>Ò>Ò> .22 a> a>-g-g-g I:: I:: I:: :>. 0. 0. > > - - - '¡: .¡: .¡: ::;a>a>ooüuuo.o.o. ,U)U)zzoooU)U)U) - ü .¡: - en o 0> ,ç: I:: o N en Q5 ~en C "t3§ Cl) Ü(]) ~a> :¡::; g- o. "0 ü I:: £0 a> en ~ 0 0> 0."0 o E ,ç: ~ æ I- o~ en...J ~ ..= 0 "0 a> a> en J:: I:: - I:: a> en ro.c 'õ~ Š:Š en ~-E.a> ~ ~ - a> ~ ro 1::"0" I:: I:: ~ ð ~ E 0 I:: Ö ~ .~ E,+-~a>~::>~"Oa> ~~~ã50~ OI a> (]) a> a. t3 :¡::; :¡::; 4= .S2 > ,- £ E a> I:: I:: ~ a> I:: ro 0 ~ a> (]) ~ ;:, o_<.!)üU):2:2oc... ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ . . . .. m ca Q) :a g caN !:! :>. < ca -¡: e: Q) .2 > mO 'ü ~ Q) a> c'o ull: m m Q) e:" 0'- ._ CJ c.æ OJ:: :=õ .~ :>. >.0 Q)"O 0:: Q) <i. ~ e: J:: .2 .!!! m :ë '> ca Q) ... 0:: m Q) W e:CJ ~moe: .. 'E ëii ca e: ca 'ü .= Q)"OQ)'E :2æco . ... aJ(/)U Q) Q) Q,CJ ca e: CJ ca ~ e: e:"O ca ... ..JO .0 - a> 0> "0 ;:, .c "0 en I:: t3 ro ro I:: 0. ro .ê a. "0 .S2 I:: 0> ro -a> m ro ro en en ð.Þ!V(]) ~ en - I:: 0. ªa> 0. ro "0 .2: ro ,ç: I:: t3 '(3 ,~ ~ & I:: 0 X (]) ;:, a> a> a> 8ro~ro ;:, a> ;:, ro ro '> ro I:: > a> > ii:wD:::W iC 1C iC .;; e: o .. Q) CJ E"O~ .¡: æ õ U 0 Q) aJ IJÎ e: ... Q) ¡¡:; CJ m Q) .¡: 0 ~]!E- <i.cæ e: o õ" ... ca ... ::s e: ca o > UWe: Q) ... 0 ECJ" .¡: .¡: CJ Utí~ !.Øõõ ~ .E :>'1:: "0 0> ~ 1::2 a. co co I:: en t5 .2 ~ ~ ro :Q ro .~ ~ .ç: 0 .!:!1 E £ > = ;:, ,& ~ ~ u.. 0. ~ 00 00 00 NN ~ ........ a> a> E E E E ;:, ;:, U)U) t3 '¡: ~ o Õ ~ "E o ü a> E '¡: ü .... o I:: .Q ro ;:, :>. I:: 0> :¡::;2 I:: ro o '- üèÏ5 .. .. f"- .... o ('i) a> 0> ro c... I:: .2 m 'ü Q) C aJ o o o N - "<t en ::J - ro êi5 en ::) ~ <c ~ en "0 ( ) - ( ) "ã. E o U "0 ( ) - ( ) "ã. E o U z COO) w-O) ~~O) <c~~ :E 0. 0) ¡:::EC: en 0 '§. WUCl) !!2 ro o l') '(3 c: ::J o U Z <t: ...J a.. Z o ¡::: <t: I- Z W ~ W ...J a.. ~ en c: o >- ïñ C) ,!!1 w E ~ E 0: 0 ~ u en-g ro en 'E ro o .J:I ro .L:: - '§ ã5 ( ) ~ "0 ( )"O ( ) ( ) c: ( ) _ c: c: ( ) ( ) ~ t: ::J ::J- u2 ( ) ( ) c: c: 'E 'E ~ ~ ( ) ( ) - - ( ) ( ) 00 .. .. .. "0 ( ) - ( ) "ã. E o U eX) 0) - N ~ "0 ( ) - ( ) "ã. E o U 0) 0) 0) ~ 0) c: '¡:: a. CI) !!2 ro o 0) :!= ( ) .:;; ( ) ~ "0 c: ro en c: o '¡¡¡ ,!!1 E E o U "0 c: ro en "0 ~ ro o .J:I .L:: - '§ - ( ) ( ) ~ en c:= c 0 C'O oc:. rÄ c¡j ( )~ g¡ 0 ëñ ... .:; ( ) ~ !II .. ( )+:..!!?en ~~~ 8. .ag~EÕ -o.5i .. u~.!::E( ) z"E ::J ::J,="Ooõ 00.::J.. 0. .Þc ~u"'" _ - !II !II c:-..... ~:=.!!? ::J ( )Q)O!ll~ U ( ) õ.. U !II E ëii 'E .- <C 'S; E .E 'S; 1: '(3 C'O 1: ( ) 0 ( ) ( ) .- ( ) 0 ( ) 0: u~o:~o: 8.cm:5! .UO.O.o..c: . <c<co:mo:ucacoW c: o +:. ...J !II U <C c ( ) O - 0 .!:: ë¡¡ C C) ~ en - æ 'E ~ o E .- m 0 ~ "':uo: eX) 0) - 0) "0 ( ) - ( ) "ã. E o U ( ) ~ E E 0) o ui 0) c: UuO)+:; "O~~-~ ( ) "0 ;:!: E ã:>2Q) "ã.C:c: ( ) ::J Een-, o~_ U a. ro 0) 0) 0) ~ eX) 0) 0) ~ .: en ::J 0) ::J <t: 0) c: '¡:: a. CI) en c: o .¡¡¡ .!!1 E E o U "0 c: ro en "0 ~ ro o .J:I o - c: o Æ ro :,:j "0 C ro en ~ o en ':;; "0 <t: '(3 c: ::J o U >- .J:I "0 ( ) > o ~ a. a. <t: c: o .¡¡¡ en ( ) en .::t:. ~ o ::J ~-, ( ) "O( )"O"O ( )E( )~ ã5 E] ,!!1 '(3 "ã. E a.- §EoE-g OO~OC;¡ uu:!=u( ) O)( )enO) ffi$~~ ~~.L::<O EO)en E ::J c: o e ,Q U£1o "0 c:"O ( )$ E ( ) E"ã. o E u 0 ~U 0) 0) 0) ~ ..: ( ) E E ::J CI) eX) 0) 0) ~ ..: ( ) C ~ en ::J U E "0 c: ro ( ) $ cñ ~ 0) E ,f¿ E ro o ( ) u .L:: U cñ o >- I ( ) "0 c: <t: ::J ..... en o - en u c: ::J o -g +:; 0 ro u "0 ( ) c: ( ) E( ) en=-5 ro 'E ~ ~ 0 E æ ~ ( ) 0 en ~c:U~ :!= '-E U en ( ) 0 a. ':;; (¡) I ::J ( )-"O0 CI:: .gs <t: OJ >. ~ !II oð c¡j c: ( ) iiiU!II C'O ::J;t¡ ~~8. ~~~§ :;,"0:; :;'001:: U<Co. UC)U8. ciii ( ) ~iii~ 0. o c ( ) .!!? C.!!? 0 .¡;:¡ 0 = :ë.S!:ë oð '(3 ~ 'E ( ) 19 1\1 19 en ~gEæiYJgiYJ~ ."OO~."O .( ) <cwuumwuz C "O~ co. C'Oiii iii c .. 0 B~æ :;,uz u :;, .. oö;B.E en en ( ) ~ 0) o It c: en en ( ) ~ 0) o ~ a.. c: 0) 0) 0) ~ o o o N 0) c: '¡:: a. CI) o o o N :¿, ::J -, ~- ( ) - c: ~ ( ) $ ~ E E o U oð :¿ ro c;¡ g - '¡:: c: a. ( ) CI) E c:.8 -5 "0 (J) o§ ~ ~ ,~ ( ) Ü :ë CI)( ) - "S c: ~ ,S2 -g ~~~en.2 C:.8encen .aro.::t:.( )( ) o ,!: 0 ~ :e §: 'E ~ en '~ og~t..... enu$roO) tenrog§ ro _ ~ ,- en - c: ..... E 'x ~ ( ) 0 ~ ( ) .adj O).gõ "S-;;:¡.!:( )( ) Uw"Oa. ( ) '(3 c: ( ) ~ ~ ( ) ::J ~ o a."'" 0 ( ) ECI)"á3E£ ( ) .L:: ::J ( ) ( ) :g g ,!: :g -º ee§e~ a..£U a.w '(3 c: ::J o U .L:: - '§ c: o '¡¡¡ en ( ) en .::t:. ~ o :!= ã5 CI) .. .. ( ) C) õ C 0: -g !II :;, ->. LL ~ ( )Eu .. .!!? ( ) .!2cc o.ca¡¡:: >< ~ ( ) WUC . ( ) . c:Ew en en ( ) ~ C) o ~ a.. c: o o o N ..: ( ) - c: ~ .. (/)"0 (/) ( ) ( )- ~ ( ) o"ã. ~ E a.. 0 'sU 00) 00) o 0) N ~ 0) c: c: "¡: "¡:: a. a. CI)CI) - ü ( ) .L:: - .!: (/) t ro ro ::J (/) ':;; ( ) en- E ro ro 0 ~ a. O)~ e 8 a.,S .. Q) U C !II C'O !II E ( ) .. U .g ~ ( )o. o.oð 0. !II .!2"O ( ) .. > C'O ( )"O C æ <ièñ "0 ( ) - ( ) "ã. E o U 0) 0) 0) ~ 0) c: '¡:: a. CI) t- ..... o "<t ( ) 0) ro a.. !II C o +:. C'O :;, iii > .. w m ( )>- ... ( ) ( ) õ..£ E C) o c U .¡: :;, mc !II !II >. Q)": ~ ~ë~~~~ co.CC'O( )" C'OCC'O"'C'" E.S!:E ~ 0 g.. 01\1~( )=um 't: :;, .- en <C .:i c l iii u ~ ~ .. '51 ,>o·-,-~c cnw.....uuuw o o o N -- "<t rJ) :J - CO û5 rJ) ro o (9 T5 c:: :J o Ü c:: CO c: c:: o :.= CO - c:: <1> E <1> C. E __....~___._________._o__.".".~·~~__.,,·~·_"~_··· ,_..._-_...._._-~~,~-----~~.~-- <1>"0 ~$ "O~ c:: 0 ~ ,~ <1> c:: > .- ëñ "0 c:: <1> <1>ro ..c::"O ~ 0. 0.:J E c:: :;:o~ > c..J 0. ~ <1> 4:: CO 00"0 :J <1> I- a; «:-Q I- rJ) 00 c:: o c..J <1> .!:) ZO cog W-N 1-1--- «~ffi :E1l.~ _00:<1> 1-":::- 00 0 ,!: WU~ s::: "0 <1> ro "0 0. :J ,~ c:: CO C. <1> rJ) >- :J e>-g ~~ ~ ,~ I- rJ) (/) a5 ..c:: <1> ~ 0. E o c..J ~ <1> 4:: CO 3: <1> '> <1> 0:: ~ :E W t: CI) z c: o~ i= >- U-ê « CI) > o <i.. c: 11:1 ë: ....I CI) e:(~"2 U o :J .2 C) æ e>'tJCI)C:C: c: .- .- I1:I~C:'E ....Io::~O . J .... "0 <1> - <1> rJ)c. CO E <1> 0 roü 0) 0) 0) ..- ..: <1> .!:) E <1> c..J <1> o 3 CI) .:; CI) 0:: CI) ~- ::I :J ... 0 U >- oS 11:1 :E....I U'tJ ~ c: « 11:1 aJ "0 "0 rJ) rJ) <1> <1> g¡ g¡ §§ 0,0, 0.0.00 E E ~ ~ 000..0.. üüEE o 0)0000 0)0000 O)oOON ..-NNN": ..: <1> <1>g>g>g>E C o¡: "¡: "¡: E :;: 0.0.0.:J > Cf)Cf)Cf)Cf) "0 rJ) rJ) ~, rJ) rJ) ~ <1> <1> <1> ~ ~ _OJ OJ 0.00 E ~ ~ 00..0.. üEE 0) 00) O 00) 0) 00"- ffiggN ..: ..-NN":~ ..:ó)ó)<1>E $ c:: c:: E <1> c:: ï:: .¡: E c..J ~~~~~ CO ro > > rJ) 0 0 OJ ~ a. c:: 0. 0. :.= CO CO <1> '13 oð oð "E ~ § c::"E "13 c:: gg ~ ,~ 8 ,Q $ ~ § g :J '> :ë ..c:: t5 "S '> 0 ~ §~~~~§~~:6 ~ g g 3: u ~ g 3: '13 ~ -g -g .~ '§ ~ -g ,~ § <1> 0 0 <1> 0 <1> 0 <1> 0 Cf)üüO::üCf)üO::ü . ~ ~ .. . . ~ . it c: 11:1 ë: CI) .~ CI) c: CI) ..c:: CI) ~ CI) 0.... E 11:1 0'tJ u:§" o c: .!!! c.. CI) ~ 11:1 - ..c:: OJ ::I CI) 0- ~ 11:1 0'tJ ..c:: 0. I-:J o "0 <1> ã> c. E o ü c: 11:1 ë: c: .2 CI) :~ oS 'tJ 11:1 .Q'tJ ::I 0. OO:J u..i "0 "0 "0 <1> <1> <1> - -- <1> <1> <1> c.c.c. E E E 000 üüü 000 000 000 NNN ..c:: ..c:: ..c:: c..J c..J c..J ~ ~ ~ CO CO ro ~~~ - <1> OJ "0 :J .!:) "0 _ c:: c..J CO ro c:: 0. ro ,É c. "0 u c:: 'ÕJ CO $ rJ) ro rJ) rJ) ~ <1> <1> êñ :J a5 ro'§:G c:: c:: c..J ,g> ~~ o X <1> <1> <1> <1> ro3:ro :J <1> :J ro '> ro > <1> > UJO::UJ ~ ~ ~ ... U '¡: ~ tiT o 3: CI) 0 E e- .¡: ::I c: Ull.o g!i:j.. ... ~ U ¡;: 11:1 CI) CI) 0 .= O::aJo <i.. c: o 0" .:= ~ c: .= 00 U... CI) .g E- .¡: .!!! uo N ~ .E >.c:: "0 ~~ c:: _ 0. ro ro c:: en ~ .Q ~ ~ ro "0 ro ,~ .~ ,!: ~ .9:1E- > = :J <1> <1> CO 0:: a. ~ 00 00 00 NN ~ .....'" <1> <1> E E E E :J :J Cf)Cf) o ü ü '+- o c:: o :.= CO >. ê OJ :.=$ c:: ro o ~ üû5 ~ ~ >- C) CI) - 11:1 CI) ~ Eüèñ .¡: :s c: U.!!! 0 .. c: 0 11:1 .2 õ ::I CI) ~ c: -- ~ ;; U c: c: CI) 0 0 cuu aJ 0) çn >.0 <1> .!:)gc:: 3: N :J <1>~' '> <1> ü <1>Eü ~. E 0 rJ) "O:J-rJ) <1>Cf)"O <1> Q)=Q)~ c.ut:o E c:: 0 ~ o 15 g-o.. üüo::E 0) 0) 0) ..- ..: <1> E E :J Cf) 0)0 0)0 0)0 ..-N ~ .....'" <1> <1> E E E E :J :J Cf)Cf) c:: ro C. 0. o ã3 > <1> o '13 c:: :J o Ü c:: Eg o ro ~- '+- c:: § <1> :.= E c..J <1> ~c. ë5 E ~ ~ ~ c: o .. U >-« -;;; c: ::I .2 Eñí E U c: o ::I 11:1 uæë: u - o c:: o :.= CO c..J t+= en ~ ro rJ) rJ) <1> ~ rJ) g¡g¡:-Qrog¡OJ,"" c> '- g> E æ c cl ee'6~e'6'6 o..o..c::'§o..c::c:: EE~ a.c::~~ 000 000 000 NNN o 00 00 0":00 ":a;gg g>ENN '¡: E o.:Jroro Cf)Cf)IJ..IJ.. ~~~ <1> <1> <1> E E E E E E :J :J :J Cf)Cf)Cf) oð OJ c:: ~ ~ <1> :-Q ~ <1> f'-. 4:: - ro 0 rJ) I.!) <1>~ g, rJ) c:: CO ro cou"O c::o.. ~ <1> c:: 0 ro"O~ t5 ~ c:: E c::,~ o¡{Jo rJ)~"O _~~rJ)~080.oð ro ro ~ ro ~ ~ c:: 3: - <1> ~ rJ) 15 g ,~ CO :.= -æ CO ->. rJ) c..J > "ÔC::Ec:::!:~ro~ o <1> 0'- ü 0. - ....I ::2 _ 3: <1> è -º '13 ü ü ü ,~ ,!: ~ ~ § 0::0::0::~'Q)<1><1>0 ooo~o::20ü ~ ~ ~ it it 'Ie .. 11:1 CI) ~ e:( ~ .. c: CI) :!2 <i.. 'tJ c: 11:1 CI) U E ¡;: ~ .~ .Q 0. c: e rJ) 00 11:1 c.. c: 0. ë: CI) :ï:i .2 c: .§ g ~ .2 CI) 0 CI) ü cuce:( aJ U ... c: CI)'tJ E c: c: 0.11:111:1 .2 >. ë: ~C)c: CI) oS 0 'tJ11:I" CI) ~ U o::èñe:( M o o o N - ~ I/) ::1 ro û5 !E. C'O o o 't:) c: ::1 o U c: C'O ïï: c: o :¡:; C'O 1: Q) E Q) "Q. E - c: Q) i~ Q) c: (I)"Q.~ :;) E .... 1-0- « (,) ~ I- 3: os: I/) (I) .~ ~ ~ I/) > 0)- ~ ~ c: .s1 0) .- 0. 0 ~ 8>5Q: C:§UE z cO w- 1-1- «~ :Ea. -:E ~O w(,) c: o :¡:; C'O I/) oS: c: ~ O)oQ o ,S: ro ~o ~~~~ro-g~ $(,)U$$$$o.Q)Q) ~g>~~~..9l~~EC> 0. 'õ a:::: 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. E 0 EO)..c:EEEE:æSQ: oc:~oooo_Q)C: U03:UUUU(/).... o 0 "'00 00", "'00 00", "'ON",ON", ~N.Ò)~N<5~ Q) O)E..- O)E Q) 1: .§ E - :: E 1: :;: o.::1C'O 0.::1:;: >(/)(/)u.(/)(/» 0000 0000 0000 NNNN 0) 0)0) c: c: c: c: .~ .¡:: '¡:: 1:: 0. 0. 0. 0. (/)(/)(/)(/) ~ Q) ~ c: Q) C'O Q) Q) "Q.C: Q) ::; e..~ §~ g~ ~ê §~g, ~~¡{J~~ I/) :¡:; 'õ >. ~:6 ~ ~ Q) '¡¡j I/) Q) .~ oð (,) $ oð .S: C'O ro E Q) I/) I/) Œ 0.3: ~ I/) 3: O)E 0...... ~ :º Q) .~ _I/) Q) ~ § Q) :§ ~ 5 5: ð "õ:º >. ~'S: ~ - os: ,~ e (,) ~ I/) o.g)~u ~ ~~ ~ Q) o.oð.s1 ~ .~ ~ $' ~ '§ ~ ~ '§ o~ ~ .~ ~ ~ Q) ~ ~ ::1 0 Q) ::1 0 Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) a::::a::::~ouooua::::~a::::~~ '" ~ . . '" . '" it it . . '" . >- <:) W I- ~ I- (I) :EO) w c: !::; I/) z ')( Qw I- 3: ~ .~ > ( ) 0::: <i. c: o E I/) o a. >. 5 g¡ Q.~ o~ III ãi .... ( ) > Qj' :!;! ~::s:: o . c: a.aJo c: c: o .2 .- - - CJ ..J ~« 0« ëij 0 oð c:o.>. <:) .2 ~.2 c: 0) (1 - (1 ( ) ... 0_ O:::I-a.a. -¢ >. (,) (1 CJ o > ~ c( 0. o ãi>' > C) ( )~ C ~ . - (,)(1) C)III c: c: ._ C\ - - ilia. ')( oð W III 3: c: ( ) 0 'S; :E ( )~ 0::: c: .0 «(,) >. .2 ~ § o.~ .2 0 ( ) 3: > ( ) ~ ~ . ... aJu. oð ~ ( ) ::1 CJ - c: CJ (1 c: ~c:oðo ::: ( ) >.; ~ëCJCJ '::ëij= ~ C::E~C Lri c: (1 ( )ë: CJ 0. æ 0 c:ãi ( ) > ë ( ) (1 C :E(,) ~~ Q) Q) - - Q) Q) "Q."Q. E E o 0 UU 00 8808 NN80 ":":NN Q) Q) E E ~ ~ E E '¡:; o¡:; ::1 ::1 0. 0. (/)(/)(/)(/) I/) Q) (,) ... ::1 I/) 0 Q) I/) (,) ~ t50ð C'O ... Q) 0.::1 oð c: I/) Q) Q) > :º ~ Q) "õ I/) c: 0. Q) O)~ ã> c: c: Q) E o:¡:; I/) :.¡:::;;cna.> Q) (,) 'x ... (,) ~ Q) ..... æ'õQ)-g C:oðro~ -ê 3: 0.0) .... Q) E oS: o~ .~ S ]2 ... oð ~ §-= 3: Q) ã>gQ)C: > ::1 'S: :s Q) 0 Q) ::1 oua::::o iC . iC iC III c: C) .2 c:~ ;" III c: ')( 0 w(,) 3:oð .~ III > ( ) ( ) 'u 0:::= ...; 0 ....a. >.c: .2 (1 õë: a. E (1 ... 'u ~ c: C) ê c: ü:S cDoð I/) I/) I/) I/) I/) I/) Q) Q) Q) ... ... ... 0)0)0) 000 ... ... ... e..e..e.. C:EE c: c: o ,Q ~ § ~ "Q. 0. :> E E ,~ 00> (,) (,) ~ ~>'c: O): :: ,_ ~ ,_ oS: C'O ~::1~~"'" C:-C:C:I/) Q)I/)Q)Q)..... e..õe..e..° 00 00 00 NN ..: .0 Q)Ò)0 EE~ §§-¡¡¡-¡¡¡-¡¡¡ (/)(/)U.U.U. 00 00 00 NN .5 '§ I/) Q) I/) (,) ~Q)t5 ... > C'O ::1 0 ... 0.00. gj C'O oð I/) ... c: I/) ro Ù)0Q) Q) Q) ~ :º Q) >. êQ)"õ L!) Q)¡{J0. æ x >.00) ..c: Q) I/) ~ I/) c: c: (,) C:~Q)C:~C'O""'o Q)......Ow- ..c: ::1 ::1 :¡:; 'x 0. ~ ::~'5~Q)roQ) Q) ..... ~Q)~ >~~eC'O>. o 0)$ 0. 0.L!) c: ~ ~ ~ æ 5 ~ '~ Q) Ox ~ (,) I/) Q) c: Q) Q) L!) oð 8. ro ~~Q)Q)3:0 0- 0- c: c: Q) Ci:¡:; 1: 1: = +:: 'S: c: Q)Q)'5::1Q)jgQ) ~~ooa::::-~ iC iC it it it III ... ( ) (1 ~ ( ) c: >- ( ) It) ¡,j ~ Q.c:0::: o 0 ãi;oð ~ CJ III C .!!!.," ,..; e g¡ ...a.z >. CJ o a. ( ) III 'S; ( ) 0::: (,) 00 00 0000 OONN 00 NN <50) . _ c: =_c'- C'O C'O .- 0. u.u.~(/) '" it iC iC ~ Q) N o¡:; o ..c: '50 C'OO >.U ~..c: .a 0) I/) ::1 (/) e -..c: LU_ -¡¡¡ > °I Cia:::: c: ~Z C'O ... "Q.oð.2 ... 3: I/) C'O Q) Q) Q) 0- ::1 >.ã)1/) L!) ... ,~ Q) 't:) ~ .S: c: :¡:; +:: ::1 c: ::1 0 Q) OU~ c: .!!! a. 0. o ãi > ( ) C C oð III E ~ .0 o ... a. III ~E .- ( ) ë g ( ) 0 32(,) <i. ~ J: ( ) c: .~ ( ) 0." ~ ~ <:)~ r--::;) ~ $ ..... °Ë .0 ::1 I/) - (,) Q) 'õ' I/) ... I/) 0.Q) N01 , 0 « ... LUe.. I- c: 00 00 00 NN ..:..: Q) Q) E E E E ::1 ::1 (/)(/) I/) ~ 't:) 0) c: '¡:; I/) 0 Q).Q (,)..c: ... 0) ð 'ã) I/) c: O)..c: c:=: ~ 3: §$ ..... C'O ~ oS: 0"E - 0 ~o LUU ... ... ( ) õ 0::: III ">. :!:: (,) ( ) c: ¡¡:: ( ) C aJ ûj Q) ::1 C" Q) ... 0) ,S: ~ c: ::1 ..... ~ E .0 ::1 I/) Q) a:::: o o o N C'O U. t-- ..... o <D Q) 0) C'O e.. c: (1 ë: c: o ; CJ « 0. o ãi > ( ) C (,) o o o N -- ~ en :J ro êi5 en ro o <.9 ·ü t:: :J o U t:: ctI õ: t:: o :¡::¡ ctI - t:: (J) E (J) 0. E en (J) t) >. >. .~ ctI ctI (J) m~~~ ;:) (J) (J) 0 ~-g-g3: <:J:J(J) ~ 3: 3: '::; m (J) (J) ~ .::; .::; en (J) (J) t:: '-'-=0 :t:::t:: ctI ctI 53 êi5êi5a. z cO W- ~~ <~ ::¡¡:D.. -::¡¡: ~O W() 000 000 000 NNN rororo LL.LL.LL. >- C) W ~ en < ã3 a::: > ~en.£1 m (J) (J) t) t) en .~ '~ a¡ (J) (J) (J) en en t:: en en en t:: t:: t:: :.;:::;:;::::;:;:::; en en en ·x 'x 'x (J) (J) (J) 3:3:~ (J)(J):¡::¡ .- ,- t:: ¡j) ¡j) (J) 0:::0:::32 .. .. .. ::¡¡: II) II) WQ)'Q) !:: (J > Z .~ .3 O~Q) ¡::: ~ .~ () Q) ë= < .- Q) ~m a:::oð <i. ..J....'Q) <.....> OC)Q) C) .= -; :t t) 1\1 .- ... ë= m Q) oöm en en (J) (J) t) t) .~ '~ (J) (J) en en "- "- o 0 3: 3: (J) (J) '::; '::; (J) (J) .... .... en en t:: t:: 'ë'ë t:: t:: (J) (J) a. a. 00 00 00 NN ~ '-- (J) (J) - - t:: t:: ~~ en -0 (J) (J) en t:: (J) ent) t:: .... !E 5 ctI en (;j ~ (J) (J) .... .... :J :J - - .2.2 £'£' CC (J) (J) 3232 .. .. E .... Q) ~ C) t::.... o 0 ..J C ~ c.o·~ !: -Ü:::l ~.!!!. 0 Q) 0 en cn:&: a:I en (J) t) .~ (J) en "- o 3: (J) '::; (J) .... en t:: -0 t:: (J) a. .,- .,- 00 00 NN en en t:: t:: "¡:: o¡:: Cl.Cl. Cf)Cf) en -0 (J) (J) t:: (J) .... :J - .2ro oð ê5 en.... .!: §: (;j ctI 'x oð (J) t:: .... 0 .Ei5 t:: (J) ctI ,!:: 0.-0 .~ g <:J :J :J 0 au I'-- "- o I'-- (J) en ctI a. .. .. -- Q) t) .~ c Q) 1\1 m- e.. c.C) .2 t:: Q) .- >:t Q) 1\1 CÙ) () ~j ,.:" .,:' INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL NoJR 2000-039 '-~ 4 :::::ct: April 10, 1999 Review & Discuss Possible Amendments to the Sign Regulation Ordinance No. 2374 Relative to Light Pole Banners City Council on March 27, 2000 reviewed two variance requests to allow banners to be placed on light poles as seasonal decoration. As a result of the case, Council requested that the sign ordinance be amended to address this type of treatment. Staff has drafted the attached proposed language to the Sign Regulatiohs for your review. In summary, light pole banners would be allowed with a permit for a period not to exceed 60 days. A property would be eligible for three permits in a one-year period. A single permit may allow several banners. The banners may not exceed 32 square feet in area nor extend above the maximum height of the light pole. Finally, the message on the banners may only be seasonal in nature and may not directly advertise a business or sales event. Staff is looking for further feedback from City Council to determine if the draft language is what you desire to consider in a public hearing. If Council is generally satisfied with the proposed language, Staff will set a public hearing on May 8, 2000 to consider amendments to the Sign Regulations and to amend the development fee ordinance to include'fees for these banners. "-- L:\Cases\Staff Reports\lR 2000-039 Light Pole Banners 4-10,doc ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2374, THE SIGN REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TO PROVIDE REGULATION OF LIGHT POLE BANNER SIGNS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Ordinance Number 2374 was adopted on March 15, 1999 to provide for the comprehensive regulation of signage within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend certain portions of the regulations and to adopt additional regulations; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: I. THAT, Section 5 "Definitions" shall be amended to add the following definition which shall read in its entirety as follows: Light Pole Banner Sign A temporary sign whic:h is painted or printed on a strip of cloth, canvas, or other flexible material supported by a frame and mounted on a single light pole. II. THAT Section 9 "Table of Permitted Signs", shall be and is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows: The Table of Permitted Signs, included in this SE~ction, presents the zoning districts where the locations of signs shall be allowed or prohibited by these regulations, Signs are listed in accordance with allowable zoning districts shown as shaded areas, and zoning districts where certain signs are prohibited shown as blank areas, Ordinance No. Page 1 of 4 ~_""~_'"_.~__~."u,,_"_~,_--,-______.=____.,~~_.______ y~~ " .. .,' ...... ...', Non-Residential districts I Table of Permitted U A Signs . A. Ground Sians 13A '" . :' :" ., , Electronic Message Y 12 · · · · · Board 4 Major Y 4 · · · · · · · Development Sign Monument Sign Y 3 . . . . . . . · · · · · · · · · · Pole Sign Y I · · · · · · · · . Subdivision Y 5 . . . . . . . · · · · · · · · · · Nameplate Sign Menu Board Sign y 2 · · · · · · Traffic Directional N 6 · · · · · · · · · · Sign B. Building Sians 13B Canopy Sign Y 2 · · · · · · · · Projection Sign Y 3 · · · · · · · · · Wall Sign I Y I · · · · · · · · · · · C. Temporary Sil; n 13C New Development Y 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Sign Banner Sign Y 7 · · · · · · · · · · Construction Trade N 8 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Sign Flags l N II · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Garage Sale Sign N 5 · · · · · · · · · Grand Opening N/Y 10 · · · · · · · · Sign Light Pole Banner Y 12 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Sign Political Sign j N 6 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Portable Sign> Y 3 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Real Estate Sign N 4 · · · · · ,. · · · · · · · · · · · · Weekend Y 9 · · · · · '. · · · · · · · · · · · · Advertising Sign Multi-family allowed one Wall Sign per street frontage, Company logo flags not allowed in AG, RIS, RI, R2, R3, R4D, R6T, R8, & MHI districts, Political Signs are regulated as either "AG & R" district signs or "All other district" signs, Electronic Message Boards allowed outside the Freeway Overlay Zone have additional restrictions than Electronic Message Boards allowed within the Freeway Overlay Zone. See additional restrictions under the Portable Sign regullations, Ordinance No, Page 2 of 4 """" '-"-"-'-'---'-"-~-'--~-'---------..-_- III. THAT Section 13 "Sign Height, Area, Construction and Placement Standards", C. Temporary Signs, shall be and is hereby amended to add 12. Light Pole Banner Signs, to read in its entirety as follows: a. A permit shall be required for Light Pole Banner Signs. b. Light Pole Banner Signs shall be allowed in zoning districts shown in Table 10, Table of Permitted Signs. c. A single permit may be issued for multipl~3 Light Pole Banner Signs, a number which must be specified on the permit application. d. A Light Pole Banner Sign shall not exceed 32 square feet in size. e. Light Pole Banner Signs shall not project above the maximum height of the pole. f. Light Pole Banner Signs shall be kept in ~~ood repair and remain securely attached in such a manner to withstand wind loads in accordance with the Uniform Building Code. g. Light Pole Banner Signs shall not be displayed for a period to exceed 60 days; nor shall a permit for Light Pole Banner Signs be issued for the same property more than three times within a one year period. h. The primary message displayed on Light Pole Banner Signs may be seasonal in nature and may not directly advertise a business or sale event. IV. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or section of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. V. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 22.74 shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this Ordinance, Ordinance No, Page 3 of 4 .. --'-~._-^.,'_~·~_~~o___"_""'-_____. VI. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. PASSED AND APPROVE BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 8 DAY OF MAY, 2000. Mayor Charles Scoma City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Department Head APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Ordinance No, Page 4 of 4 I ,.... - . . '. INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Nd~ 2000-040 ~ Date: T Subject: April 10, 2000 "- . Review & Discuss Possible Amendments to the Landscaping Regulations No. 2423 Relative to Applicability to Nonresidential Uses in Residential Districts. The Zoning Ordinance allows public schools, post offices, and religious facilities to locate in any zoning district in the city including single-family residential districts. Because of the way some of the city's ordinances are written, these uses have less stringent development requirements when constructed in single-family residential districts. Mainly, this is true in the case of landscaping regulations. A major aspect of the city's landscaping regulations is to buffer residential uses from more intense l ses through the use of screening walls and landscaping buffers. However, the landscaping regulations do not apply in single-family residential districts. As a result, when located in a single-family zoning district, institutional uses are not subject to the landscaping requirements. The General Criteria section of the landscaping regulations reads: C. General Criteria 1. The standards contained in this Section are considered minimum standards and shall apply to the following zoning districts: R-4-D Duplex Residential, R- 6- T Townhome Residential, MH1 (when containing two or more dwelling units); R-7-MF Multi-Family District; 0-1 Office District; LR Local Retail ' District; C-1 Commercial District; C-2 Commercial District; OC Outdoor Commercial District; 1-1 Light Industrial District; 1-2 Medium Industrial District; and U School, Church, and Institutional District. Agricultural uses and single- family residences and their accessory buildings shall be exempt from the requirements of this Section except as provided in two (2) below. 2. All single and two-farnily residential properties shall provide a minimum of three (3) three (3') inch caliper trees of a species found on the approved plant list in exhibit A. At least one such tree must be located in front of the required front building line. The loophole allowing institutional uses in single-famify districts to develop outside the landscaping requirements can be fixed by amending this section to apply to all districts and exempting only single-family uses: \\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1\DATA\PZ\Cases\Staff Reports\IR 2000-040 Inst Landscape .doc ~ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS \ ~. L \ ,--. -'" '~ C. General Criteria 1. The standards contained in this Section are considered minimum standards and shall apply to all zoning districts the fGllev/ÍRg ZfJF JRg.distr:iets: R 4 D Dl:IfJ!E»C ResideRtfe!, R ê T TfJWAAfJFRfJ RÐsJf1eRtia.', MH1 ("/ReR eeRta,W,iF1fJ å'lG 0:' FRÐffJ Elwe,'!fRg l:JRits); R 7 MF MI:JJti PSFR!!Y f).:stFiÐt; 0 1, OItiee Df6tr:if;t; LR Loea,' RetaN D,istr:iet; C 1 CÐFRFRfJffJ,ia! {)!str:ist; C :2 CfJFRFRfJFeÍa,' Df6tr:ifJt; OC Ol:JtdÐÐ," COFRFR9Feial Dfstr:if;t; " 1 Ught !Rdl:lfJtFk:J! Di6tFifJt; ! 2 Medil:lFR ,'Rdl:JstFia! Dfstr:iet; aF/d U SOOf)(),', CRl:JfÐÞ1, GRd !Flstftf:Jt,ifJRal Distr:iet. Agricultural uses and , single-family residences and their accessory buildings shall be exempt from the requirements of this Section except as provided in two (2) below. 2. All single and two-family residential properties shaJ/ provide a minimum of three (3) three (3'J inch caliper trees of a species found on the approved plant list in exhibit A. At least one such tree must be located in front of the required front building line. If Council is generally satisfied with the proposed amendment, staff will set a public hearing on May 8, 2000 to consider amendments to the Landscaping Regulations. Respectfully submitted, -;b~~ \\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1\DATA\PZ\Cases\Staff Reports\IR 2000-040 Inst. Landscape ,doc 2 \ INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 00-041 ,-. ~ Date 4/10/00 T SUbj~ct: Discussion of Amending Tax Abatement Ordinance to I nelude Personal Property Tax Abatement Currently the City of North Richland Hills tax abatement policy only allows tax abatements on real property. This is fairly typical of most other cities, however with the changing job market it is becoming more commonplace for cities to consider abating the taxes on personal property with the abundance of call centers, high tech and other technology driven businesses. A prospective tenant planned for Richland Pointe Mall recently approached the City of North Richland Hills. The tenant, Software Spectrum, plans to bring nearly 600 new jobs to the city which will be phased in over the next twelve months with an average annual salary of $25,000 - $35,000. Software Spectrum is a 1 billion-dollar publicly traded NASDAQ Company and they have requested the city consider a personal property tax abatement valued at 3.5 million dollars. There are several concerns with personal property tax abatements, which I have listed below. · Personal property is self reporting · It is easily moved in and out · The value is typically depreciated over a specific time period Should City Council consider amending the tax abatement policy on this issue it needs to be \..- made very clear in the application for the abatement policy that the company render each year a value to Tarrant Appraisal District on the dollar amount of personal property. According to Tarrant Appraisal District some companies do not accurately supply a value of their personal property and essentially forces TAD to either do a "drive by" or make an assumption based on the size of building that "X" number of dollars are on site for personal property. The cities of Arlington, Fort Worth, Dallas and others currently consider personal property tax abatements. The City of North Richland Hills has not considered this previously and may need to consider any impact that this may have on the Richland Plaza where a tax increment-financing district was constructed thus eliminating the opportunities for these additional tax abatements. Council consideration - There are several options for Council at this pre meeting, however none of which will be to take any action. · Do not consider amending our current tax abatement policy · Consider amending tax abatement to consider each case for personal property · Consider personal property tax abatements only when the value exceeds 3, 5 or 10 million or any threshold Council deems necessary and set a percentage amount of 25, 50 or 100% · Instruct staff to bring back amendment to the tax abatement ordinance and consider this ',- individual request ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS '-....- " 2 "-/ Any abatement is based on the value as of January 1 at each given year. Therefore, there is no "rush" to address this with this particular company. However, they would like some assurance or consensus that the Council is willing to consider this prior to them making a final decision. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call me. Respectfully submitted, Steve Norwood \...... \...... ,.<~_.__"____.u__..__~.~_~~______·__~_··,_·_·~~..··_~_·,__~·_~.,.~,,'.",~' Present: MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE PRE-COUNCIL ROOM AT CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - MARCH 27, 2000 - 5:00 P.M. Charles Scoma JoAnn Johnson Lyle E. Welch Russell Mitchell Frank Metts, Jr. Don Phifer Matt Milano, Ph.D. T. Oscar Trevino, Jr. Larry Cunningham Randy Shiflet Steve Norwood Greg Vick Patricia Hutson Alicia Richardson Rex McEntire Larry Koonce Marcy Ratcliff Jim Browne Thomas Powell Pam Burney Karen Bostic Bill Thornton Kevin Miller Paulette Hartman Chris Swartz Mayor Mayor Pro T em Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager Managing Director Community Services City Secretary Assistant City Secretary Attorney Finance Director Director of Planning Director of Parks & Recreation Director of Support Services Environmental Services Director Budget Director Assistant Parks Director Assistant Public Works Director Adm. Asst. to City Manager Aquatic Manager ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT CALL TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. with all Council members present except Councilman Phifer, Councilman Phifer was present at 5:05 p,m, __,_~..,_,~,~~___________",__~__~_.__,~e"_.~..'~_____'''.'"._._~,~_...~,_,"~."._.~,_~.__.,..._~_.__.~".._,,~~_~"__._.~.-,~_.- City Council Minutes March 27, 2000 Page 2 DISCUSS ITEMS Agenda Item No.1 0 & 11- SRC 2000-01 & SRC Marcv/Steve N. FROM REGULAR 2000-02 - Staff was asked if they had come up with MARCH 27 any alternatives to provide for these type of banners AGENDA in the City, since seasonal banners are also used by the City. The City Manager advised that if the banners were not for advertising, the Council might want to direct that an amendment be prepared to the ordinance that will allow for seasonal types of banners, The Mayor suggested that in addition to considering seasonal banners, the Council might also want to consider an ordinance that would allow businesses that are affected by road construction some considerations such as pennants, portable signs, etc. Staff was directed during the regular Council meeting to prepare for the Council's consideration an amendment to the Sign Ordinance that would allow for banners of this type by businesses and to provide for the regulation of the condition of the banners. Agenda Item No. 17 - GN 2000-28 - There was RandvlTom S. concern expressed that "reasonable deposit" should be a specific amount. It was felt that if the deposit varied between groups, it might be looked upon as being discriminatory. Staff advised that the deposit would be based on the size of the group and the impact the group would have on city services. The Council approved the ordinance during the regular Council meeting with clarification that the deposit be based on the size of gathering and projected impact on municipal services such as security, and for the repair of any damage to city property, or the cost of cleanup, or both. City Council Minutes March 27 2000 Page 3 - IR 2000-035 BIG Staff briefed the Council on the history of the Big Grea/Steve N. FOSSIL CREEK Fossil Creek Watershed Flood Damage Study, WATERSHED Council was advised that in order to pursue a Texas FLOOD DAMAGE Water Development Board Grant to fund the study, REDUCTION local entities within the Big Fossil Creek Watershed SERVICE were being asked to participate by sharing in the cost of the program, If all entities participate, North Richland Hill's share will be about $21,000 over a three year period. There was discussion about participation on the committee that oversees the study. The Council also discussed tying the level of committee member participation to the percentage of the watershed that goes through the City. The consensus of the Council was to participate in the Big Fossil Creek Watershed Flood Damage Reduction Study, for Staff to proceed with notifying NCTCOG of the City's willingness to participate and a resolution will be brought to the Council for formal action, ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma announced at 5:18 p,m, that the meeting would adjourn to Executive Session for deliberation regarding real property (land acquisition) and for deliberation regarding economic development (prospect for commercial development) as authorized by Sections 551.052 and 551.086 of the Local Government Code. Charles Scoma - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary __.M."_____.'.._~_~_______~_~___·_··___·__"_·_·,_<,·,,_w~'.,~,,>---..,--~,,--.-~~..- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - MARCH 27, 2000 -7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order March 27, 2000 at 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Charles Scoma JoAnn Johnson Lyle E, Welch Russell Mitchell Frank Metts, Jr. Don Phifer Matt Milano 1. Oscar Trevino, Jr. Staff: Larry J, Cunningham Randy Shiflet Steve Norwood Greg Vick Patricia Hutson Alicia Richardson Rex McEntire Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager Managing Director of Community Services City Secretary Assistant City Secretary Attorney 2. INVOCATION Councilman Metts gave the invocation, 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None. 5. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA None. .~___..__.~_'_.~."_..""_"._"^ . '^ m'<~_"'''''''_~''_u.._.'_~_''_u_"..'' " . ~ City Council Minutes March 27, 2000 Page 2 6. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED A. MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 2000 B. MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 28,2000 C. MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 2000 D. GN 2000-24 - APPROVING THE MASTER ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH TXDOT FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ISTEAAND TEA-21 FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAM GRANTS - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-22 E. GN 2000-25 - AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT AUTHORIZING PASS-THROUGH STATE GRANT AGREEMENT FOR NETS F. GN 2000-26 - JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY INCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-21 G. PU 2000-14 - CONTRACT RENEWAL WITH VMC LANDSCAPE SERVICES FOR MOWING OF RIGHTS-OF WAY H. PU 2000-15 - AWARD BID FOR HVAC REPLACEMENT TO WALKER MECHANICAL IN THE AMOUNT OF $52,937 I. PU 2000-16 - AWARD BID FOR LOADER TO CONTINENTAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $94,270 J. PU 2000-17 - AWARD BID FOR INSTALLATION OF SOD AT CROSS TIMBERS PARK TO THOMAS BROTHERS GRASS - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-20 K. PU 2000-18 - AWARD BID FOR THE NRH20 ANNUAL FOOD SUPPLY CONTRACT TO BEN E. KEITH FOODS - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-09 L. PU 2000-19 - AWARD BID FOR TRAFFIC MATERIALS SUPPLY CONTRACT TO ROADRUNNER TRAFFIC SUPPLY AND VULCAN SIGNS - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-19 M. PU 2000-20 - REJECT BID FROM CLASSIC TILE AND PLASTER FOR POOL REFINISHING N. PU 2000-21 - AWARD BID FOR MOWER TO PROFESSIONAL TURF PRODUCTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,950 ___~_~_________._,,_~_.~_._.<._._.,^._._._~._.._~____~.__,..._.....~.-·..~.,·.._.u___~'ø________"·_'~..____·__ .. City Council Minutes March 27, 2000 Page 3 O. PU 2000-22 - AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF POLICE VEHICLES FROM SHOWCASE CHEVROLET IN THE AMOUNT OF $44,040 P. PAY 2000-01 -APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 10 IN THE AMOUNT OF $86,415.41 TO J.L. BERTRAM CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING, INC. FOR DOUGLAS LANE PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Q. PAY 2000-02 -APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 121N THE AMOUNT OF $44,598.55 TO WALT WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE MISCELLANEOUS 1998 STREET IMPROVEMENTS R. PAY 2000-03 - APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT NO. 10 IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,783.56 TO WHECO ELECTRIC, INC. FOR SCADA SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION - 1998 S. PAY 2000-04 - APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT NO. 12 IN THE AMOUNT OF $62,670.85 TO PKG CONTRACTING, INC. FOR MACKEY CREEK DIVERSION CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Councilman Phifer moved, seconded by Councilman Metts to approve the consent agenda. Motion to approve carried 7-0, 7. PZ 99-27 - PUBLIC HEARING TO RECONSIDER THE REQUEST OF RACE TRAC PETROLEUM, INC., FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A CONVENIENCE STORE WITHIN 200' OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY ON PROPERTY ZONED C1- COMERCIAL. THE SUBJECT IS PLATTED AS LOT 6, BLOCK 2, WALKER BRANCH ADDITION AND IS LOCATED IN THE 8700 BLOCK OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY - ORDINANCE NO. 2450 (DENIED BY CITY COUNCIL AT THE 2/14/00 COUNCIL MEETING) APPROVED Mr. Mitchell Noftsger, applicant, summarized his request. Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed request as it relates to city codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing. City Council Minutes March 27, 2000 Page 4 Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved to approve PZ 99-27, Ordinance No. 2450 with the following changes. That the hip roof canopy shall be smaller, the building will be done in brick, with brick surrounds on canopy columns, brick walls around the dumpster, and the sign will be a monument type sign. Motion to approve carried 5-2; with Councilmen Mitchell, Metts, Phifer, Milano and Mayor Pro Tem Johnson voting for and Councilmen Welch and Trevino voting against. 9. PZ 2000-02 - CONSIDER SITE PLAN REVIEW OF A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 200' OF RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY ON TRACT A-1, BLOCK 29, HOLIDAY NORTH ADDITION, SECTION 6 AND ZONED C2-COMMERCIAL. (PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH RICHLAND BOULEVARD AND DAVIS BOULEVARD AT 5701 DAVIS BOULEVARD) APPROVED Mr. Joe Wilkinson, representing applicant, summarized request. Ms, Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed request as it relates to city codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Councilman Trevino noted that the neighbors who live along the back of this property seem to have driveways and access to their backyards through this property. What is going to happen to their access. Ms. Ratcliff advised Council that the access to the neighbors' backyard would be up to the individual property owners and the owner of the property, as the gates are on the applicant's property. Mayor Scoma clarified that a 6 foot screening fence would be erected on the back of the property. Councilman Trevino advised that is the reason why he raised the question; the individual property owners will not have access to their backyards. Ms, Ratcliff advised Council that the access in question is to storage buildings and not garages. Mayor Scoma believes the issue raised by Councilman Trevino is the reason why residents impacted by either a site plan or zoning should be notified so they have an opportunity to speak on the issue. If this is not in our current procedures than we have to get it incorporated. City Council Minutes March 27, 2000 Page 5 Mr, Wilkinson advised Councilman Trevino in this particular area there are no driveways that back into that alley. The screening wall is going along the back so none of the neighbors will be affected. Councilman Trevino also advised applicant that he and Steve Norwood attended a meeting at the mobile home community off Mockingbird. The residents major concern is the traffic at the offset of Mockingbird and North Richland Boulevard. It is difficult when someone is turning left onto Mockingbird going east on Mockingbird or going west on North Richland Boulevard. Have we taken that intersection into consideration and the affect this is going to have on that intersection. Ms. Ratcliff advised Council that the Public Works department reviewed the driveways and recommended the applicant place the driveways where they are shown on the site plan. The driveway along Davis Boulevard aligns with Mockingbird. Councilmen Mitchell suggested that Council look at the possibility of right-in and right- out. The city has a possibility of congestion at every corner where commercial property is constructed. Councilman Phifer moved to approve PZ 2000-02 as recommended by the Planning & Zoning Commission with the exception of the two-foot reservation, and the right-of-way to be dedicated on the plat and shown on the site plan. Councilman Milano seconded the motion. Motion to approved carried 5-2; with Councilmen Mitchell, Metts, Phifer, Milano and Mayor Pro Tem Johnson voting for and Councilmen Welch and Trevino voting against. 10. SRC 2000-01 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF THE ABERFELDY III LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TO VARY FROM THE SIGN REGULATIONS, SECTION 4.D SIGNS ATTACHED TO UTILITY POLES, ON LOTS 1 R & 2, BLOCK 4, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION IN A C2-COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT. (PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5515 - 5559 RUFE SNOW DRIVE AND KNOWN AS COMMERCE PLAZA) APPROVED Ms. Barry Triest, applicant, summarized her request. Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission, Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing. City Council Minutes March 27, 2000 Page 6 Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Metts to deny SRC 2000- 01. Councilman Trevino recommended staff modify the sign ordinance to include the usage of banners as requested by applicant. He also recognized the importance of being careful with the language used in the ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson concurred with Councilman Trevino that it is time for Council to modify the ordinance. She also suggested that 10% of the banner allow the name of the mall. Motion to deny carried 7-0. Mr. Cunningham verified the consensus of Council is for staff to explore the ordinance and modify to include the usage of banners under certain conditions and bring back to Council for their consideration. 11. SRC 2000-02 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF THE ABERFELDY III LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TO VARY FROM THE SIGN REGULATIONS, SECTION 4.D, SIGNS ATTACHED TO UTILITY POLES ON LOT 1R, RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION IN A C2-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. (PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8251 BEDFORD-EULESS ROAD AND KNOWN AS RICHLAND COMMONS) APPROVED Ms, Barry Triest, applicant, advised Council this was the same as the previous request. Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing, Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Welch to deny SRC 2000- 02. Motion to deny carried 7-0. City Council Minutes March 27, 2000 Page 7 12. SRC 2000-03 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF HARWOOD GRAPEVINE LTD TO VARY FROM THE SIGN REGULATIONS FOR CANOPY SIGNS ON LOT 5, BLOCK 1, WALKER BRANCH ADDITION IN A C1-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. (PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8405 HARWOOD ROAD) APPROVED Mr. Marshall Merritt, applicant, asked Council to look at the sign ordinance and asked for Council's interpretation of wall signs. He asked the Council to consider if the letter and logos on the gas structure covering the gas dispensers fall under a wall sign or canopy sign. He believes it falls under a wall sign. If it is determined to be a canopy sign then he respectfully requests a variance to the canopy definition. Texaco's have 30" letters and 33" logos that are standard. Ms. Ratcliff advised Council that Mr. Merritt asked for an interpretation request from the sign review board. It is staff's opinion that this is considered a canopy sign and he must meet the regulations of the canopy size of the letters and logos. Councilman Mitchell asked what the difference if any was between this sign and any other sign in the city. Ms. Ratcliff advised Council this is the first gas station that has come in for a permit that falls under the new sign regulation ordinance passed in March of 1999. It is her understanding that the Land Use Ad-Hoc Committee specifically looked at canopy signs. Staff feels we interpreted the ordinance correctly. She sees how Mr. Merritt can see the way the ordinance is written it could be construed as a wall sign, Mayor Pro Tem Johnson asked if Staff has taken into consideration how much lettering is allowed on the canopy sign. She does not want the canopy sign to be used as a marketing tool for the store. Councilman Metts believes Council should approve the request for variance and Staff revisit the Sign Ordinance. Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing. Mr. Cunningham asked Marcy if this canopy letters are allowed will this also allow an additional wall sign on their building. Ms. Ratcliff advised Mr. Cunningham that applicant would be allowed a wall sign. Mayor Scoma is concerned that Texaco has a small number of letters and emblem. If Council approves larger letters, than Mayor Pro Tem Johnson's point was now the City Council Minutes March 27. 2000 Page 8 applicant can advertise on the canopy sign. He believes that is what concerned the Land Use Ad-Hoc Committee, The size of letter is dictating rather than the amount of verbiage on the canopy. Ms. Ratcliff advised Council that the sign regulation specify that on a canopy 50% of that area can be covered with a sign. Based on that area the letters on the canopy can not exceed 12" and the logo can not exceed 16" in height. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved to approve SRC 2000-03 with the provisions that only the name and logo are permitted on the canopy sign with the letters at 33" and the logo at 30". Councilman Welch seconded the motion, Mayor Pro T em Johnson requested that staff looks at the ordinance and bring back to Council for clarification and changes. Motion to approve carried 7-0. 13. LRC 2000-02 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF EDWIN SMITH FOR A VARIANCE TO THE LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS, ORDINANCE NO. 2423, TO ALLOW A 12.7% LANDSCAPED AREA WHERE 15% IS REQUIRED, AND TO VARY FROM THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING FOR PARKING LOTS ON LOT 1R, BLOCK 1, TAPP ADDITION (PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5201 RUFE SNOW DRIVE) APPROVED Mr. Leon Backes represented the applicant and summarized his request. His company is converting the old outlet mall into a new office project with the health club remaining, He is happy to report that they are close to having the project leased that would provide about 1200 jobs. They bought the property last fall and since that time have been working with the Economic Development Department trying to make sure they followed all the rules and regulations. They were advised that a new landscaping ordinance was in effect when submitting for their building permit application. They have added extensive landscaping but it does not comply with the ordinance. Mr. Michael Kendall landscape architect for applicant advised Council that they are seeking variances to the landscape area percentage and the landscaping of parking lots. They have agreed to additional landscaping in the island and to raise the island on the drive to concentrate the vehicular traffic. Councilman Trevino asked what they were going to use for the raised curb. Mr. Kendall advised Council that it was going to be a solid concrete island. City Council Minutes March 27 2000 Page 9 Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing. Councilman Trevino moved to approve LRC 2000-02 with the condition that additional landscaping be placed on Combs by the first turn in. Councilman Phifer seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 7-0. 14. LRC 2000-03 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF TEAGUE NALL & PERKINS, INC. FOR A VARIANCE TO THE LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS, ORDINANCE NO. 2423, SECTION G-LANDSCAPE SETBACK ADJACENT TO PUBLIC STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY TO ALLOW A 5.5' LANDSCAPE SETBACK FROM BROWNING COURT WHERE A 15-FOOT LANDSCAPE SETBACK IS REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY IS KNOWN AS LOT AR2, BLOCK 3, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION IN AN 12-INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. (PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6350 BROWNING COURT) APPROVED Councilman Phifer abstained from discussion and vote. Mr. Tom Rutledge, applicant, summarized the request. Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission, Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Johnson to approve LRC 2000- 03. Motion to approve carried 6-0, with Councilman Phifer abstaining. City Council Minutes March 27, 2000 Page 10 15. PS 99-42 - CONSIDER REQUEST OF GSBS BATENHORST FOR A FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BRENTWOOD ESTATES ADDITION. (PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND SHADY GROVE ROAD) APPROVED Mr. Jim Tharp representing applicant summarized the request. Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Councilman Milano moved, seconded by Councilman Trevino to approve PS 99-42. Motion to approve carried 7-0. 16. GN 2000-27 - RESET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO RECONSIDER AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1874 TO ADD ARTICLE 12, NEIGHBORHOOD PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS PZ 99-36 - ORDINANCE NO. 2455 (DENIED BY CITY COUNCIL AT THE 2/14/00 COUNCIL MEETING) APPROVED Ms. Ratcliff advised Council that due to a staff error the item did not get published, and that it would be necessary for Council to reset the date for the public hearing, Councilman Mitchell moved to reset the date for the Public Hearing on the Neighborhood Parkland Dedication Requirements to April 1 0, 2000. Councilman Welch seconded the motion, Motion to approve carried 7-0. 17. GN 2000-28 - APPROVE MASS GATHERING ORDINANCE - ORDINANCE NO. 2463 APPROVED Mr. Tom Shockley, Police Chief, summarized GN 2000-28, Councilman Trevino is concerned with the word "reasonable" in the ordinance where it precedes the word deposit. City Council Minutes March 27, 2000 Page 11 Council discussed the options to change the wording. Councilman Trevino moved to approve GN 2000-28, Ordinance No. 2463 with the stipulation that we go back and revisit the two points on deposits (sections 4.0.5b (pg 3) and 9.01) Mr. Cunningham suggested that reasonable deposit be based on size of gathering and projected impact on municipal services. Councilman Trevino restated his motion to approve GN 2000-28, Ordinance No. 2463 with changing the statement that applicant pay a reasonable deposit of security to applicant pay a reasonable deposit based on the size of gathering and projected impact on municipal services. Councilman Milano seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 7-0. 18. GN 2000-29 - RENEW INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR ANIMAL HOUSING SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF WATAUGA - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-13 APPROVED Ms, Pam Burney, Environmental Services Director, summarized GN 2000-29, Councilman Welch moved, seconded by Councilman Mitchell to approve GN 2000-29, Resolution No. 2000-13. Motion to approve carried 7-0. 19. GN 2000-32 - APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH TRI-CITIES TRAIL COMMITTEE AND AMENDING THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH MESA DESIGN - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-23 APPROVED Mr. Jim Browne, Director of Parks & Recreation, summarized GN 2000-32. Councilman Don Phifer moved, seconded by Councilman Milano to approve GN 2000- 32, Resolution No. 2000-23. Motion to approve carried 7-0. ..,._·,.'.··.k_r".."'·_....,.~--.._~_w,___,,_____~~___~_____ City Council Minutes March 27, 2000 Page 12 20. GN 2000-33 - CONSIDERATION OF OPTING OUT OF THE SALES TAX HOLIDAY ACTION Mr. Cunningham summarized GN 2000-33 stating that Council has the option to participate in the sales tax holiday. If Council should choose not to participate in the sales tax holiday they are required to hold a public hearing prior to casting an official vote. If Council wishes to continue the city's participation in the sales tax holiday no action will be required on items 21,22 and 23. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved to continue the city's participation in the sales tax holiday. Councilman Mitchell seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 7-0, 21. GN 2000-34 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER OPTING OUT OF THE SALES TAX HOLIDAY NO ACTION NEEDED 22. GN 2000-35 - COUNCIL VOTE TO OPT OUT OF THE SALES TAX HOLIDAY NO ACTION NEEDED 23. CCD 2000-01 - SITTING AS CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT BOARD, HOLD PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON REPEALING APPLICATION OF SALES TAX HOLIDAY EXEMPTION - CCD ORDER NO. 2000-01 NO ACTION NEEDED 24. GN 2000-36 - APPROVE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION ORDINANCE - ORDINANCE NO. 2464 APPROVED Mr. Randy Shiflet, Deputy City Manager, summarized GN 2000-36. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Mitchell to approve GN 2000-36, Ordinance No, 2464. City Council Minutes March 27, 2000 Page 13 Motion to approve carried 7-0. 25. PW 2000-10 - APPROVE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ORDINANCE. ORDINANCE NO. 2461 APPROVED Mr. Kevin Miller Assistant Director - Public Works summarized PW 2000-10. Councilman Trevino inquired why we are limiting ourselves to saying anything under 100 vehicles trips, He suggests that paragraph 2, under section 1 stay in the ordinance, Councilman Trevino moved to approve PW 2000-10, Ordinance No. 2461 with the stipulation that the following remain in the ordinance under section 1, second paragraph: The City Council may require a TIA at any stage of a development whether it meets this criteria or not if the Council finds that special circumstances exist requiring a TIA. Mayor Pro Tem Johnson seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 7-0. 8. PZ 99-45 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF ERNEST HEDGECOTH FOR GLENVIEW BIBLE CHAPEL FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACTS 1A & 1 B, WILLIAM COX SURVEY, A -321 FROM AG-AGRICUL TURAL TO U-INSTITUTIONAL. (PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 7200 BLOCK OF DAVIS BLVD) - ORDINANCE NO. 2462 APPROVED Mr. Ernest Hedgecoth, applicant, summarized his request. Ms. Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning, addressed the request as it relates to city codes and ordinances and summarized recommendations of staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing, Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Metts to approve PZ 99-45, Ordinance No. 2462. City Council Minutes March 27, 2000 Page 14 Motion to approve carried 5-2; with Councilmen Metts, Phifer, Milano, Trevino and Mayor Pro Tem Johnson voting for and Councilmen Welch and Mitchell voting against. A. CITIZENS PRESENTATION None. B. INFORMATION AND REPORTS North Rich/and Hills Library received notice that they won a Texas Book Festival Award. Mrs. Laura Bush, First Lady of Texas, will recognize our Children's Librarian Liz Brockman at the Texas Library Association Conference in Houston on April 12, Residents are invited to North Richland Hills "Great American Clean Up", Saturday, April 1 , 9am to noon. 16. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma adjourned the meeting at 9:44 pm. Charles Scoma - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary ;;. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 4/10/00 Subject: Certification of Unopposed Candidates and Declaring Agenda Number: GN 2000-36 Unopposed Candidates Elected to Office - Ordinance No. 2466 Chapter 2, Subchapter C of the Texas Election Code provides for the cancellation of an election when each candidate whose name is to appear on a ballot is unopposed and there is no proposition appearing on the ballot. The filing deadline to apply for a place on the ballot was March 22 and the deadline for write-in candidates to file declarations of write-in candidacy was March 27. At the conclusion of the filing deadlines, all of the candidates for the May 6 election were unopposed. The law states that the authority responsible for preparing the official ballot (City Secretary) shall certify in writing and deliver to the governing body a certification of unopposed status as soon as possible after the statutory filing deadlines. Attached is the certificate of unopposed status certifying that the following officers have filed for election and are unopposed: Mayor Council, Place 2 Council, Place 4 Council, Place 6 Municipal Judge Charles Scoma Russell Mitchell JoAnn Johnson Joe Tolbert Ray Oujesky On receipt of the certification from the City Secretary, the law states that the City Council by ordinance may declare each unopposed candidate elected to office and an election is not held. Ordinance No. 2466 declares the unopposed candidates elected to office. The newly elected officers may not assume their office until after the May 6 election date and therefore will assume their duties effective May 8,2000. Recommendation: To accept the certificate of unopposed status and to approve Ordinance No. 2466. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev,) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director .'< :3:W2lui /~~ Department Head Signature ~6~ City Manager i ture CERTIFICATE OF UNOPPOSED STATUS To: Mayor & City Council City of North Richland Hills From: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary As the authority responsible for having the official ballot prepared for the May 6, 2000 election, I certify that the following persons have duly filed for election to the City of North Richland Hills offices for the said May 6, 2000 election: Mayor Council, Place 2 Council, Place 4 Council, Place 6 Municipal Judge Charles Scoma Russell Mitchell JoAnn Johnson Joe Tolbert Ray Oujesky I further certify that only one candidate's name for each office would appear on the ballot and no write-in candidate has filed for a place on a list of write-in candidates. I further certify that the statutory time has expired for any type of filing. This certificate is given under my hand and seal this 28th day of March, 2000. \\\1 III III HIIIIII "\\~'I" ",-,,,, "~ ~~~......_--= ~~~ ~~""n ..~ \ ;:: -" \~ ' .... ç .. .-::. =1,&.1 r ~ =01 r .~= - ! ~: - ::~1 : ::: ~~\ h ¡ f ~_v··.. .... ~ ~ '. ,'" ~ .... .... ~ "" ..~... ~, "/// 11{' "", 1111 ,I"~ //1/11111111\\\\\ -6!ßt-/2tf:tf¿ j~ Patricia Hutson City Secretary ORDINANCE NO, 2466 WHEREAS, the City Secretary has certified that all candidates in the May 6, 2000 election are unopposed and that there are no eligible write-in lists for such election; and WHEREAS, filing deadlines are past. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. It is declared by this body that each of the following unopposed candidates are elected and appointed to their respective offices: Mayor Council, Place 2 Council, Place 4 Council, Place 6 Municipal Judge Charles Scoma Russell Mitchell JoAnn Johnson Joe Tolbert Ray Oujesky 2, No canvass will be held, The above officers shall assume their duties effective May 8, 2000, PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day of April, 2000. APPROVED: Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary S TO FORM AN ~ Rex I:' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .' '- Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 4-10-00 Subject: Authorize the Publication of Notice of Intent to Issue Certificates of Obligation, Resolution No. 2000-26 Agenda Number: GN 2000-37 In a February 28th Information Report to Council, staff provided Council with the calendar of events leading up to the sale on May 8, 2000 of General Obligation bonds in the amount of $2,720,000 and Certificates of Obligation in the amount of $2,315,000. As part of the legal requirements for the planned issuance of Certificates of Obligation, the City Council must authorize the City Secretary to publish a notice in a newspaper of general circulation the intent ofthe City to issue Certificates of Obligation in the amount of $2,315,000 on May 8, 2000. The notice must be published once a week for two consecutive weeks. The first publication date shall be at least (15) days prior to the date stated therein for the passage of the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the Certificates of Obligation. The notice of intention is attached and labeled Exhibit A. Recommendation: Pass Resolution No. 2000-26 authorizing the City Secretary to publish the intent to issue Certificates of Obligation. '- Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Av ilable Finance Director '--- RESOLUTION NO, 2000-26 A RESOLUTION approving and authorizing publication of notice of intention to issue certificates of obligation, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has determined that certificates of obligation should be issued under and pursuant to the provisions of V,T.C,A., Local Government Code, Subchapter C of Chapter 271 (the "Act"), for the purpose of paying contractual obligations to be incurred for (i) street improvements, including drainage and utility line relocations and the purchase of land and right-of-way, (ii) the acquisition or improvement, or both, of land for parks, and (iii) professional services rendered in relation to such projects and the financing thereof; and WHEREAS, prior to the issuance of such certificates, the City Council is required to publish notice of its intention to issue the same in accordance with the provisions of the Act; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice to be published of the Council's intention to issue certificates of obligation during a meeting scheduled to begin at 7:00 P.M. on the 8th day of May, 2000, which certificates of obligation shall be issued in a principal amount not to exceed $2,315,000, for the purpose of paying contractual obligations to be incurred for (i) street improvements, including drainage and utility line relocations and the purchase of land and right-of-way, (ii) the acquisition or improvement, or both, of land for parks, and (iii) professional services rendered in relation to such projects and the financing thereof, and shall be payable from ad valorem taxes and a lien on and pledge of the net revenues derived from the operation of the City's combined Waterworks and Sewer System, The notice hereby approved and authorized to be published shall read substantially in the form and content of Exhibit A hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference as a part of this resolution for all purposes. SECTION 2: The City Secretary shall cause the aforesaid notice to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, once a week for two consecutive weeks, the date of the first publication to be at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date stated therein for the passage of the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the certificates of obligation, SECTION 3: It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by V.T.C.A., Government Code, Chapter 551, as amended. _.-...,._--,-_._--_._--~,._..- SECTION 4: This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its passage on the date shown below. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this April 1 0, 2000. Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary, City of North Richland Hills, Texas (City Seal) APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS. TEXAS CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION TAKE NOTICE that the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, shall convene at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on the 8th day of May, 2000, at the City Hall, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas, and, during such meeting, the City Council will consider the passage of an ordinance authorizing the issuance of certificates of obligation in an amount not to exceed $2,315,000 for the purpose of paying contractual obligations to be incurred for (i) street improvements, including drainage and utility line relocations and the purchase of land and right-of-way, (ii) the acquisition or improvement, or both, of land for parks, and (iii) professional services rendered in relation to such projects and the financing thereof; such certificates to be payable from ad valorem taxes and a lien on and pledge of the net revenues of the City's combined Waterworks and Sewer System. The certificates are to be issued, and this notice is given, under and pursuant to the provisions of V.T.C,A., Local Government Code, Subchapter C of Chapter 271. Patricia Hutson City Secretary, City of North Richland Hills, Texas CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '-- Department: Finance / Information Services Council Meeting Date: 4/10/2000 Agenda Number: PU 2000-23 Subject: Award Bid for Video Equipment to CMS/MCSI in the Amount of $37,566 In the 1999/2000 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for the replacement of video equipment for Citicable. Formal bids were solicited and the results are outlined below. CMS/MCSI $37,566 Troxell Communications $38,049 ECI Video $41 ,072 Quality Audio Visual $41,452 Wolf Cameras $41,616 Media Concepts, Inc. $47,365 --- This equipment will be used for the production of in-house video training and in the production of video programming for the City's cable TV channel. CMS/MCSI met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and can deliver the equipment within three weeks. Recommendation: To award the bid for video equipment to CMS/MSSI in the amount of $37,566. Finance Review ~ í.) ¡e.' W/ / De artment Head Si nature Budget Director Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ..,~ Page 1 of " CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .- '- Department: Finance / Public Works Council Meeting Date: 4/10/2000 Subject: Authorize Participation in the Tarrant County Cooperative Agenda Number: PU 2000-24 Purchasing Program for the Street Wedge Milling Project As part of the approved 1999/2000 City Street Overlay Program (PW 2000-03) Council appropriated funds for street wedge milling. Attached is a list of streets that will be included in this project. Council approved participation in the Tarrant County CooperatiYe Purchasing Program at the February 24, 1997 meeting (PU 97-18). They have a contract with Dustrol, Inc. for this type of work. The cost for this project through the County contract will be $18,983.75. Dustrol has done satisfactory work for the City in the past and always completed projects for the bid amount and within the number of completion day's bid. All State competitive bidding requirements will be met by participating in the Tarrant County Cooperative Purchasing Program for this project. ',-- Recommendation: To authorize the street wedge milling project with Dustrol, Inc. in the amount of $18,983.75 through the Tarrant County Cooperative Purchasing Program. Finance Review zØ Budget Director Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other . ~.- Page 1 of 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS "- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STREETSIDRAINAGE OVERLAY PROGRAM ',-- STREET TOTAL SY Field Stone Drive 1,900 North Richland Boulevard/Circle Drive N. Glendale Drive 1,900 Sunrise Drive/Sunset Road Lincolnshire Lane 1,800 Southampton Drive/Wakefield Road Plumwood Drive 1,776 Holiday Lane/Starnes Road Spring Lea Way 942 Lincoln Driye/Stames Road Northridge Boulevard 960 Harwood RoadlLynda Lane Ridgetop Road 909 Crosstimbers Lane/Meadowview Terrace Buckingham Trail 1,800 Mid-Cities Boulevard/Oldham Place O'Brian Way 1,200 Newman Drive/Cork Lane TOTAL SQUARE YARDS 13,187 CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 2 of 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Information Services Council Meeting Date: 4/10/2000 Subject: Authorize Participation in State Department of Information Agenda Number: PU 2000-25 Resources Cooperative Purchasing Program for Network Communication Equipment Maintenance In the 1999/2000 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for annual maintenance on the network communication equipment. The State Department of Information Resources (DIR) awarded a contract to Capco Communications for this maintenance. Council authorized participation in the DIR cooperative purchasing program at the July 24, 1995 meeting (PU 95-49). The total amount for the annual maintenance agreement with Capco through the DIR contract will be $21,392. All State competitive bidding requirements will be met by participating in the Department of Information Resources cooperative purchasing program for this maintenance. Recommendation: To authorize the annual maintenance agreement with Capco Communications in the amount of $21 ,392 through the Department of Information "'- Resources cooperative purchasing program. Finance Review ~ Cl !J? De art ent Read Si nature Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other - Page 1 of . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '- Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 4/10/00 Subject: Big Fossil Creek Watershed Flood Damage Reduction Study - Resolution No. 2000-25 PW 2000-11 Agenda Number: Several cities and the North Central Texas Council of Governments have been meeting and discussing this subject for approximately two years. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has developed a potential work program for the study. The study program would investigate and define potential actions that could be implemented to: · Provide policy direction to local governments in the basin study area to stabilize and reduce future floodplain development impacts on Big Fossil Creek. · Identify local flooding problems and offer recommendations for the implementation of stream bank stabilization, riparian habitat reforestation, wetland protection and creation, and erosion/sedimentation control projects (both Federally funded and locally funded). '----- · Identify ecosystem restoration opportunities through the implementation of stream bank stabilization, riparian habitat reforestation, wetland protection and creation, and erosion/sedimentation control projects. · Develop a preliminary recreation and open space plan fqr proposed project lands. The potential types of localized flood relief and ecosystem restoration projects to be investigated would consist of the creation of wetland areas and detention ponds using on- channel check dams, dams, levees, channels, channel benching, and riparian reforestation. Stream bank stabilization would include a combination of traditional armor protection techniques and vegetative treatments. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaDle ",--- Finance Director "- "'-- ~I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS' Because the Big Fossil Creek Watershed Flood Damage Reduction Study is part of the larger Upper Trinity River Feasibility Study, the study can be equally cost shared by the USACE and the local sponsor (NCTCOG on behalf of the participating local governments). The total cost has been estimated to be $1,500,000. With projected assistance from the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) through a planning grant, the remaining $375,000 would be funded as shown on the cost breakdown labeled Attachment No.1. This would include $75,000 non-cash work-in-kind and $300,000 in cash. If all the prospective participants agree to their share, North Richland Hills' share would be about $21,000 to be paid in annual payments over a three year period. Tarrant County, City of Fort Worth, Haltom City, and Richland Hills have all voiced their support at the planning meetings we have had during the last year. Our share should not increase to more than $30,000 even ifWatauga and Richland Hills decide not to participate. The City Manager has written a letter of assurance to the TWDB that NRH wants to participate in the study in a multi-city/county cooperative effort to address overall flood management planning in this watershed. The next step is for the City Council to approve the attached resolution which grants the right for NCTCOG to apply for the grant in their behalf and states the intent to commit to participate with cash and in-kind services. Recommendation - To approve Resolution No. 2000-25. CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 2 of 2 Resolution No. 2000-25 WEHREAS, the North Central Texas Council of Governments has facilitated local governments in pursuit of a COMMON VISION for the Trinity River, including watershed management planning and stabilization of flood risks; and WHEREAS, the North Central Texas Council of Governments serves as administrative agent on behalf of participating local governments in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the Upper Trinity Feasibility Study, which identified watershed management planning as a potential flood damage reduction alternative; and WHEREAS, the Big Fossil Creek Watershed of the Upper Trinity River Corridor is rapidly developing and has historically experienced significant flooding problems; and WHEREAS, municipal and county jurisdictions within the Big Fossil Creek Watershed, including but not limited to Tarrant County and the cities of Fort Worth, Haltom City, North Richland Hills, and Richland Hills, intend to commit local matching funds in cash and in-kind services for a Flood Protection Planning Study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: SECTION 1. That the Executive Director of the North Central Texas Council of Governments is authorized to apply for a grant for Flood Protection Planning from the Research and Planning Fund of the Texas Water Development Board on behalf of the City of North Richland Hills. SECTION 2. That, on behalf of the City of North Richland Hills, the Executive Director of the North Central Texas Council of Governments is hereby authorized to enter into a contract with the Texas Water Development Board for a Flood Protection Planning Study for the Big Fossil Creek Watershed. SECTION 3. That the City of North Richland Hills intends to commit local matching funds in cash and in-kind services for a Flood Protection Planning Study. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 10th day of April, 2000. APPROVED: Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary NRH Office of the City Manager CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS March 24, 2000 John Promise, P,E. Director of Environmental Resources North Central Texas Council of Governments P,O, Box 5888 Arlington, Texas 76005 CML#00-029 Dear Mr, Promise: This letter serves to provide assurances pursuant to the application for funding from the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) Research and Planning Fund for the proposed Flood Damage Reduction Study for the Big Fossil Creek watershed. The City of North Richland Hills is a participant in the proposed study and a portion of our jurisdiction is in the Big Fossil Creek watershed. We understand that the North Central Texas Council of Governments is acting as an administrative agent on our behalf to partner with the U,S. Army Corps of Engineers on the Upper Trinity River Feasibility Study and this Project Study Plan. We are writing to assure that the proposed planning does not duplicate existing projects with the exception of updating existing flood protection plans. Implementation of viable solutions identified through the proposed planning will be diligently pursued and potential sources of funding for implementation will be identified, If a grant is awarded, the City of North Richland Hills will provide the required written evidence to demonstrate that local matching funds and in-kind services are available for the proposed planning. The City of North Richland Hills is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program. Our CIO number is 480607, The City of North Richland Hills supports the proposed planning study for the benefit of all the communities in and adjacent to the Big Fossil Creek watershed, Si~CereIY b'··'· ~ -'.'. /l~ ~Unningha City Manager LJC/smm cc: Steve Norwood, Assistant City Manager Greg Dickens, Public Works Director p,o, Box 820609 . North Richland Hills, Texas . 76182-0ôC:~ 7301 Northeast Loop 820 . 817-427-6003' F,';X 81 ì -427 ,6¡j ~ Ò Wqc ~tatc of Wcxas ~ousc of ~cprcscntati6cs ~T[©~~W~@ MAR 15 2000 ,,?r-~E (J/., ~ - ;.. ;;'_.,:*-;~ ~ ". 'r"" ; J': . ..--._.~ . .,.+.... NRH Pub tic WorK@ . j _____.."'_~7___~- CAPITOL OFFICE: P.O. Box 2910 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78768-2910 512-463-0610 FAX: 512-463-8310 email: sue,palmer@house,state,tx,lIs Sue Palmer DISTRICT 89 DISTRICT OFFICE: 8101 Boat Club Road Suite 320 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76179 817- 740-9922 FAX: 817-236-1273 DATE: March 13, 2000 TO: Dale Cheatham, Watauga Greg Dickens, North Richland Hills Bill Eisen, Haltom City Renee Lamb, Tarrant County Hugo Malanga, George Behmanesh, Fort Worth James Quin, Richland Hills FROM: Sue Palmer, State Representative, District 89 SUBJECT: Big Fossil Creek Watershed Flood Damage Reduction Study: Request for Written Assurances and Participant Resolutions At the request of several local governments in the Big Fossil Creek watershed (see enclosed map), the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) have developed a potential work program to address flooding and other water resource needs of the communities within the watershed. Your community has been identified as a potential partner in this cooperative effort. The Big Fossil Creek Watershed Flood Damage Reduction Study will be a part of the larger and very successful Upper Trinity River Feasibility Study and the Trinity River COMMON VISION Program. The Feasibility Study was charged by Congress to address the "flood damage reduction, water quality, environmental restoration, recreation and other allied purposes" of the Upper Trinity River basin. The Study is cost-shared on an equal basis between the federal sponsor (USACE) and the local sponsor (NCTCOG on behalf of the participating local governments). The Watershed Flood Damage Reduction Study will be a part of the larger Feasibility Study. This watershed-based effort would identify and evaluate projects to reduce the risk of flood damage in the watershed, including structural and non-structural measures. The total cost of the of this Project Study Plan will be $1.5 million to be phased in over a three-year time frame. COMMITIEES: ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, LICENSING & ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, RULES & RESOLUTIONS The local cost share of the Big Fossil Creek project study plan will be contributed by the local government participants with projected assistance from the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). We are applying for lWDB funds from the Research and Planning Fund for Flood Protection Planning for this assistance to offset $375,000 of the local cost share. The remaining $375,000 cost share will be composed of $75,000 work in-kind services and $300,000 cash from local government participants. (Please see enclosed cost share breakout proposal.) If your community wants to participate in this watershed and flood study, we need two statements from you to apply for the lWDB funds: Written Assurances and Participant Resolution. Both of these statements are non-binding in nature and express the potential local government participant's interest in the study effort. The Written Assurances from each participant can be in a resolution or letter format and needs to include the statements that: · The proposed planning does not duplicate existing projects with the exception of updating existing flood protection plans. · Implementation of viable solutions identified through the proposed planning will be diligently pursued and identification of potential sources of funding for implementation of viable solutions sought. · If a grant is awarded, written evidence that local matching funds and in-kind services are available for the proposed planning must be provided when the contract is executed. · Applicant is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program, Although a Council Resolution or Court action could be selected to provide this assurance, you may choose to provide this assurance in a letter format. A letter of assurance listing the point list above may be sent by a city manager, county administrator or the chief elected official. This resolution (or letter) of assurance must be submitted with the lWDB application. We have enclosed a sample letter of assurance for your convenience. A Participant Resolution is needed from the governing body of each participant. The resolution must include language that: · states the entity's representative (NCTCOG) is authorized to apply for a grant from the Texas Water Development Board on your behalf; · grants authority for the entity (NCTCOG) to enter into a contract with the Texas Water Development Board on your behalf; and · states the intent to commit local matching funds in cash and/or in-kind services, The resolution is needed for the TWDB to consider the application. We have enclosed a sample Participant Resolution for your convenience. Your Written Assurances and Participant Resolution both need to be received by NCTCOG no later than March 24, 2000 so that they can be submitted to the TWDB with the application by the March 30, 2000 application deadline. If your community is interested in participation but will not be able to execute resolutions by March 24, 2000, please contact NCTCOG immediately. The Written Assurances and ParticiDant Resolution need to be sent to the attention of: Sam Medlock, Environmental Planner NCTCOG P.O. Box 5888 Arlington, Texas 76005-5888 If you have questions about the application process, please contact Sam by phone at 817/695- 9219 or email smedlock@dfwinfo.com. Thank you for your interest and cooperation in this important opportunity for all the commun~~ State Representative Sue Palmer SP/jet cc: Rep. Joe Barton, Dist. 6 State Rep. Lon Burnam, Dist. 90 State Sen. Chris Harris, Dist. 10 State Senator Jane Nelson, Dist. 9 Gilbert Ward, TWDB Jack Tidwell, NCTCOG Rep. Kay Granger, Dist. 12 State Rep. Bill Carter, Dist. 91 State Sen. Mike Moncrief, Dist. 12 State Rep. Vicki Truitt, Dist. 98 Gene Rice, USACE DRAFT COST BREAKOUT FOR BIG FOSSIL CREEK PROGRAM Potential ork roaram ost rea out Potential Total Work Proaram Cost $ 1,500,000 Federal Share $ 750,000 Non Federal Share $ 750,000 . W P C B k SCENARIO D - WITH $375,000 STATE ASSISTANCE Proposed Total Cost Share of $375,000 Local Share less $75k local non-cash WIK 3-year breakout Acres within Bia Fossil Creek Watershed City Name Acres Percent Total 1st 2nd 3rd Unincorporated 8815.62 25.18% $75,552 $25,184.00 $25,184,00 $25,184,00 Fort Worth 16,238.66 46.39% $139170 $46,390.00 $46,390.00 $46,390,00 Haltom Citv 3,604.97 10.30% $30 900 $10,300.00 $10,300,00 $10,300.00 Watauaa 2,598.41 7.42% $22 269 $7,423.00 $7,423,00 $7,423.00 North Richland Hills 2,378,02 6,79% $20,379 $6,793,00 $6,793.00 $6,793,00 Richland Hills 1,369.02 3,91% $11,730 $3,910.00 $3,910.00 $3,910,00 Saainaw 954.24 2.58% $0 $0.00 $0,00 $0,00 Haslet 673,38 1.82% $0 $0.00 $0,00 $0,00 Keller 314,07 0.85% $0 $0,00 $0,00 $0.00 Blue Mound 0.Q1 0.00% $0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total: 36,946,40 100,00% $300,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 NOTES: * Several participants listed above may not participate. The additional cost would be added to the remaining participant cost share. * Participants not included in the cost-share breakout, but with part of their jurisdiction in the watershed may be included at a later date. Participant cost-shares would be adjusted to reflect additional participants. * NCTCOG is also assessing whether TXDOT would have a role in the program. * TWDB support is based on assumption of one-half of the non federal cost share. * A portion of the local cost share may be in-kind services. DRAFT ATTACHMENT No.1 . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS "'- Department: Parks and Rècreation Council Meeting Date: 4/10/00 Subject: Appeal Public Hearing to Reconsider AmendinQ Agenda Number: PZ 99-36 Zoning Ordinance No. 1874 to Add Article 12, Neighborhood Parkland Dedication Requirements - Ordinance No. 2455 (Denied at the February 28 City Council Meeting) The City Council, at their July Budget Retreat, discussed the potential for evaluating and implementing a Neighborhood Parkland Dedication Ordinance. In response, staff prepared a survey and collected ordinances from area cities that have adopted parkland dedication or impact fee ordinances. The City Council, at their August 27, 1999 meeting, reviewed the survey data and a summary of ordinances. The Council concurred with developing a draft ordinance that was not just based on impact fees, but required the dedication of land with the choice of implementing impact fees. The Council also concurred that the City should have the discretion and flexibility to determine if the proposed dedication is acceptable and if the fee should be imposed in-lieu of dedication. The Park and Recreation Board, at their September 10,1999 Work Session and again at their September 21, 1999 meeting, evaluated the potential benefits of implementing a neighborhood parkland dedication ordinance. The Board discussed the purpose and intent of the ordinance, and unanimously agreed to recommend that City Council consider adopting Neighborhood \-- Parkland Dedication Article 12 as an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. The following items are contained in the proposed ordinance: · The requirements of the Article are intended to contribute towards assuring that open space and neighborhood park facilities are available to meet the needs created by development pursuant to the 2000 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan. · The requirements shall be applicable to residential and non-residential development for which a final plat has not already been formally submitted. · Requirements for residential developments are at a ratio of 1 acre of parkland for every 40 dwelling units. Requirements for non-residential developments are at a ratio of 1 acre for every 50 acres. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Avai a e ~ :=::)-;~ Department Head Signature G;J Budget Director "- Finance Director Page 1 of 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .~ · The City determines if the proposed dedication is adequate in size, dimensions, character, and minimum area. If not, the applicant shall be required to pay cash in lieu of dedication of land. · The City shall annually establish an acreage land value cost to be used in calculating the fee in lieu of dedication. · Where the City desires land dedication, such land dedication will be shown on the final plat. Where the City requires cash in lieu of land, upon receipt of an application for building permit the City shall calculate the applicable fees due. The Council, at their September 27, 1999 meeting, directed staff to take their comments and questions to the Park and Recreation Board to develop a final draft ordinance to present to the Planning and Zoning Commission in order to amend the Zoning Ordinance to include these requirements. The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their November 11, 1999 meeting held a public hearing, and then considered approving PZ 99-36 to amend Zoning Ordinance No. 1874 to include Neighborhood Parkland Dedication Requirements Article 12. The public hearing was closed and the Commission unanimously denied the motion. ''"-- Staff was required to file an appeal in order to allow the City Council to formally consider the item. The City Council, at their February 14, 2000 meeting voted 4-3 to deny the proposed ordinance. City Council later voted to reconsider the ordinance and scheduled the public hearing for April 1 0, 2000. Councilman Mitchell, in requesting reconsideration of this item, has also suggested the following changes to the proposed ordinance: 1. Placing a maximum land donation requirement, not to exceed five acres. 2. Strengthening and clarifying the City Council's authority in any appeal situation. ',-- CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 2 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2455 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874 BY THE ADDITION OF AN ARTICLE TITLED "NEIGHBORHOOD PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS"; PROVIDING REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKLAND DEDICATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEETING THE PRESENT AND FUTURE PARK AND RECREATION NEEDS OF THE CITY AND ITS CITIZENS; PROVIDING FOR PURPOSE AND INTENT; PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING LAND DEDICATIONS REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND NON- RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS; PROVIDING ALTERNATIVES TO LAND DEDICATION; PROVIDING FOR THE PROCESS AND COLLECTION OF FEES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas is a home rule city, acting under the provisions of the Texas Local Government Code and the North Richland Hills Home Rule Charter; and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills Texas has adopted the 2000 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan which establishes standards for neighborhood parks, linear parks, and open space; and WHEREAS, new development in the City generates demand for parks and open space facilities to be used by residents of such new development; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that in order to assure open space and neighborhood park facilities are available and adequate, it is appropriate and in the best interest of the City to amend Ordinance Number 1874 to authorize the appropriate parkland dedication requirements, or fees in lieu of said dedication requirements, and BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: I. THAT, the following regulations shall be the minimum standards for development within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas: Ordinance No, 2455 Page 1 of 6 -^. -'._._--~~'-""-""~'"~'~'-------^-----~-~'--'-"-~''''-,._---_._--~~~--~-.~~-_._.._-----,~ City of North Richland Hills ARTICLE 12 PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS SECTION 100 PURPOSE AND INTENT The requirements contained in this Article are intended for the purpose of assuring open space and neighborhood park facilities are available and adequate to meet the needs created by such development while maintaining current and proposed park and recreation standards pursuant to the North Richland Hills 2000 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan. It is the Policy of the City that when land is dedicated for open space and park and recreational areas, such land should be in close proximity to the development it is designated to serve. Such land shall be of size, character, and dimensions as is necessary to provide usable open space and park and recreational areas. Fees collected in lieu of dedication of land shall be used for the purpose of acquisition and development of park facilities reasonably attributable to the development assessed the fee. SECTION 200 DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this Article only, the terms that follow shall have the meaning set forth herein. Terms not herein defined shall have those meanings given them by other Ordinances of the City. Words and terms defined in two ordinances shall be read in harmony unless there exists an irreconcilable conflict in which case the definition contained in this ordinance shall control. 1. Applicant:The property owner, or duly designated agent of the property owner, of land for which approval of a building permit has been requested for development. 2. Building Permit: The permit required for new construction and/or additions to buildings. 3. Development: Any activity that requires the securing of building permit. 4. Neighborhood Park: Public land, with associated improvements typically from ê .~ acre to 4Q:15 acres in size, and providing both active and passive recreational opportunities, as specified in the 2000 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan. 5. Park and Recreation Facilities: Land and/or facilities used or to be used as a neighborhood park regardless of location, including both the acquisition of land, the construction of improvements thereon and the expenditure of funds incidental thereto. 6. 2000 Parks. Recreation and Open Space Master Plan: The official adopted Parks and Recreation System Master Plan for the City of North Richland Hills and amendments thereto. 7. Property: A legally described parcel of land capable of development pursuant to applicable City ordinances and regulations. Ordinance No, 2455 Page 2 of 6 SECTION 300 APPLICABILITY 1. This Article shall be uniformly applicable to residential and non-residential development of property in the City, which is or will be served by park facilities as herein defined. This Article does not apply to activities involving the replacement, reconstruction, remodeling, rehabilitation or other improvements to an existing residential or non- residential structure, or to rebuilding of a damaged structure, unless such activity results in a change in the type. 2. This Article applies to all property for which a final plat has not been formally submitted to the City for approval. SECTION 400 LAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 11¡IT~Residential Developments: Parkland meeting the requirements contained within this Article shall be dedicated to the City at a ratio of one (1) a~~~~!~~~~I~ndfore~~rx)f()rty residential units or prorated portion thereof~ili':Ï1I,ID,¡"ª:œª'SimYm:r,~;~~¡~t¡º[1 18\,; Non-Residential Developments: Although non-residential development does not generate residential occupancies per se, it does create environmental impacts, which may negatively affect the living environment of the community. These impacts may be ameliorated or eliminated by providing park or open space areas, which buffer adjoining land uses. Non-residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or reserved open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of parkland for every fifty (50) non-residential gross acres of development or prorated portion thereof!.:ríI1Im¡III!¡\¡~:\mãx¡mùm':¡¡'õêaiêåtiôn t~q~'~~~æ~Q~'!9f::fi~~¡r~~[~§¡ .............. SECTION 500 CHARACTER AND MINIMUM AREA 1. Land dedicated or otherwise set aside for open space and park and recreational areas shall be of such size, dimensions, topography, and general character as is reasonably required for the type of use proposed, such as open space buffer, active recreation for individual sports, playground, tot lot, picnic area, etc. 2. Land dedicated or otherwise set aside for open space and recreational areas shall be developable up-land, not lying within flood ways or flood plains. 3. If the City determines that the proposed dedication resulting from the calculations pursuant to this Article will not be adequate in size, dimensions, topography, and general character, the applicant shall be required to pay cash in lieu of dedication of land. Ordinance No. 2455 Page 3 of 6 .. ._-"-,_.,--_.""'----------~-~_._---------_._-¥-----_._-----_..~._-_._.~..,.~ , SECTION 600 ALTERNATIVES TO LAND DEDICATION .'~¡~~In any case where a dedication is required, the City shall have the right to accept the dedication as submitted for approval, or in the alternative, to refuse dedication of the same, and in lieu thereof to require payment of cash under the formula contained in this article. The City may permit a combination of dedication and fees to be used to fulfill this requirement. . ... n"Fê'víêw" by ;.::....""...._,.~.:::".:.;;".:;..:".._ _,;""--..'"".-'.::,.::.c.:;,, .:....... __., .. 2. Calculation of Fees: The City shall annually establish an acreage land value cost to be used in calculating park fees. This determination shall be based on a reasonable study and investigation performed annually, and may be performed by an independent registered land appraisal firm as to average fair market value, as opposed to tax value, of acreage in the City. This figure shall be the acreage cost under which all park fees are calculated for the fiscal year. a. Residential Dwelling Unit Fees: Fees paid in lieu of dedication shall be based on the determined cost of one (1) acre of land divided by forty (40), for a resulting fee per residential dwelling unit. b. Non-residential Development Fees: The fees payment alternative for non-residential development shall be calculated by dividing the determined cost of one (1) acre of land by fifty (50), for a resulting fee per non-residential acre cost, or prorated portion thereof. In the event the non-residential development is less than fifty (50) acres, the total acreage, net of perimeter right-of-way dedications, shall be divided by 50 to determine the prorated fee payment. SECTION 700 PROCESSING AND COLLECTION OF FEES A. Land Dedication 1. Where review of development applications has resulted in the City's desire for land dedication, such land dedication shall be shown on a final plat and shall contain clear fee simple dedication of that land to the City. 2. The Director of Parks and Recreation or their designee shall make formal recommendation to the City Council to accept or refuse any proposed park land dedication prior to the Council's action on the development. B. Fee Payment in Lieu of Dedication 1. Where review of development applications has resulted in the City's desire for cash in lieu of dedication, applicants for a building permit for development subject to this Article must submit, on a form provided by the City, the proposed number of dwelling units or non-residential gross acres in the development. 2. Upon receipt of an application for a building permit, the City shall calculate the amount of the applicable fee due, pursuant to this Article. The determined cost per acre in effect at the time of application for permit shall be used to calculate the fee. Ordinance No. 2455 Page 4 of 6 3. No building permit shall be issued nor shall any construction be allowed to begin until payment of all fees required by this Article has been made. C. Use of Park Fee Funds 1. Fees collected in lieu of dedication of land shall be used for the purpose of acquisition and development of neighborhood park facilities reasonably attributable to the development assessed the fee. Fees collected may also be used for site preparation, the extension of utilities to or within sites, the installation of landscaping, play equipment, or recreation improvements, and attendant engineering and planning costs associated with such park development. 2. All expenditures of fees collected shall be made in accordance with the 2000 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan. II. Severability Clause That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. III. Effective Date This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. Ordinance No. 2455 Page 5 of 6 DENIED by the Planning and Zoning Commission this the 11th day of November, 1999. o APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council this 10th day of April, 2000. APPROVED: Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY Véi} 7k/ Rex McEntire Attorney for the City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: c ~J~~~ Jim Browne, Director of Parks and Recreation Ordinance No. 2455 Page 6 of 6 ~. .. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/10/00 - Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of KPA Consulting Agenda Number: PZ 2000-07 for a Special Use Permit on Lot 4R, Block 4, Brentwood Estates to allow an Automobile Lubrication Center and Minor Auto Repair in a C-1, Commercial District. Located at 8401 Davis Boulevard. Ordinance No. 2470 CASE SUMMARY: Kitina Gilstrap, of KPA Consulting, has submitted a Special Use Permit Application for an automobile lubrication center called America's Service Station in a C-1 Commercial District. The proposed automobile lubrication center uses includes oil change and lube, battery service, state inspections, wheel alignments, bearings and seals, tire balance, repair and rotation, break repair, and belts and hoses replacement. The proposed 3,920 square foot building has an exterior of 100% masonry. \.-. The Planning and Zoning Commission's tabled the case at the March 9 and requested revisions to be resubmitted for the March 23 meeting. The revised plans showed the overhead garage doors facing the south. Previously, staff had requested that the overhead doors face the north, away from the residence located adjacent to the south. At the public hearing, the applicant stated that the anchor retail store, Albertson's, had requested that the doors not face north, which is toward the interior of the plaza. As currently proposed, the doors face the south and landscape screening is used to screen the doors from the residence to the south. Some of the screening shown is located on an adjacent lot to the west. The applicant, as requested by the Commission, has added a ten-foot strip of landscaping along the northern property line, which is the driveway entry to the shopping center. Several parking spaces have been removed from the south side of the building. The previously provided 28 parking spaces have been reduced to 21, still more than the required eight spaces. The dumpster has been moved closer to the southern property line, only 12 feet away. The Zoning Ordinance requires that dumpsters be setback 25 feet from residentially zoned property. Although the property to the south is used residentially, it is zoned AG-agriculture. thus, the 25 foot setback does not apply, Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available i .t-- ~ Finance Director .V11v~ 'City Manage~gnature L:\Cases\PZ Cases\2000\PZ 2000-07-42 SU America's Service Station.doc Page 1 of 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS The Special Use Permit procedure is intended to provide the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council the opportunity to review the design and operation of uses in order to decide whether they are appropriate for the area. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend safeguards or conditions of approval to reduce the affect on adjacent or surrounding properties, or recommend denial of the use altogether. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their public hearing on March 23, 2000, recommended approval of PZ 2000-07 by a vote of 5 to O. Due to the type of land use and development occuring in the immediate areas, staff recommends denial of this Special Use Permit for an Automobile Lubrication Center and Minor Auto Repair. '-~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM L:\Cases\PZ Cases\2000\PZ 2000-07-42 SU Arntmca Ii ;:)örVlctf ;:)U:ltlun.uuc Page 2 of 2 ~.'" -~.:>'.,. ,~... . .;.);\;,$" ~"- ....."'" -;.;).::....-!~- .- or 1 \.\ ,... .... t 0 z '" N~~~: I~U.\.,.~: I -~',.~4Ji!1~ R-2 1222 22 N.RTH RICIII.AND ( JiA TCH - SEE Cri~: 90-452 P~ge. DI :"kIA:'::-' : .. I" !.~- g;1-J-~~f·"····lr· I ¡ . \'f.l~' :. ;¡;.'J I' ~ Œ---. Hr. I . ),\ \"\.~:'\. Z / ).- , " .\~.\'.\ I' ,:...0 - . '='~,. 01» I~.\ 'I'" ' >o:U ,,<\ II" i\\)\ " , ~.:;:; . t' II1M;r IA ... ~/>I'C1:t W 0 (!) 0 CT .. . ~ ,,;' ---- \, r,II.\. Tit ,U :/: f' tI'A.d (. rH..~1 I ! " ~" AG .. \'.~ AG AG rltlw.:114 .----.- ·¡·t·...... C-1 1b75 'HI ..1\4 ',>fo¡ I III PZ 2000-07 KRA CONSULTING SUP FOR AUTOMOBILE LUBRICATION CENTER " JI"M..... - I / NO R TH~ tA-R R~i~T PKW'l 2'3"'/:0 I ,~ , 1'\\" J,,\ ., \'- ' -\:i(;¡\) i'" ,<\\'\ J \\\'.\, ' NORTH r~=- \ 1200 ,~ It " ::\,1\) c -, '" " . \r---- 'ž. ,-------= Q.R~ r 1_\19-R.~"" ",':J.- ~I ~¡ I~I rl '-../ AG , . \ ,,\)\)', 1 \', " '1\ \\\'. o '" Z -. -~ > -c \' q\\\'\ .... :r ~ R-l Z 2059 "" ,. o o ~ .... AG --- n .... n - .... \ '" ,.. MATCH ~/NE - SEE Crid: 90-444 Po.g.' D3 ::iIiJI\~~.E~,o...o...\Y_C.TI ~ I I I I . ADOPTED: March 22. 1993 CURRENT H' 7. PZ 2000-07 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF KPA CONSULTING, INC., FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ON LOT 4R, BLOCK 4, BRENTWOOD ESTATES ADDITION TO ALLOW AN AUTOMOBILE LUBRICAITON CENTER WITH MINOR AUTO REPAIRS IN A C1-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 8401 DAVIS BLVD. (TABLED 3/23/00) APPROVED This is a continuation of a public hearing that was tabled on March 9. Kitina Gilstrap, of KPA Consulting, has submitted a Special Use Permit Application for an automobile lubrication center called America's Service Station in a C-1 Commercial District. The proposed automobile lubrication center uses includes oil change and lube, battery service, state inspections, wheel alignments, bearings and seals, tire balance, repair and rotation, break repair, and belts and hoses replacement. The proposed building has an exterior of 100% masonry, The applicant presented the Commission with revised plans that showed the overhead garage doors facing the south, Previously, staff had requested that the overhead doors face the north, away from the residence located adjacent to the south, At the March 9, 2000 public hearing, the applicant stated that the anchor retail store, Albertson's, had requested that the doors not face north, which is toward the interior of the plaza, As currently proposed, the doors face the south and landscape screening is used to screen the doors from the residence to the south, Some of the screening shown is located off-site, on an adjacent lot to the west. Staff has not received letters of permission allowing this off-site planting, or agreements that the landscaping will be maintained by the adjacent property owner. In addition, the landscaping raises the issue of consistency in that it will likely not be continued around the perimeter of the Albertson's plaza, The applicant has added a ten-foot strip of landscaping along the northern property line as requested by the Commission, Several parking spaces have been removed from the south side of the building, The previously provided 28 parking spaces have been reduced to 21, still more than the required eight spaces, The dumpster has been moved closer to the southern property line, only 12 feet away. Ms, Ratcliff explained staff recommended approval of PZ-2000-07 to allow a special use permit for an automobile lubrication center, but to take into consideration the location of the garage overhead doors and the dumpster, Mr, Pat Adkins, KPA Consulting, Inc" explained that the requested changes to the site plan and landscaping have been made, which included the reduction in parking, relocating the dumpster and rotating the building. P & Z Minutes March 23, 2000 8 Seeing no additional proponents, and no opponents, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Welch, seconded by Mr. Davis, moved to approve PZ 2000-07. The motion carried unanimously. P & Z Minutes March 23, 2000 9 7. PS 2000-07 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF KPA CONSULTING, INC. FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ON LOT 4R, BLOCK 4, BRENTWOOD ESTATES ADDITION TO ALLOW AN AUTOMOBILE LUBRICATION CENTER AND MINOR AUTO REPAIR INA C1-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 8401 DAVIS BLVD. TABLED Kitina Gilstrap, of KPA Consulting, has submitted a Special Use Permit Application for an automobile lubrication center called America's Service Station in a C-1 Commercial District. The proposed automobile lubrication center uses includes oil change and lube, battery service, state inspections, wheel alignments, bearings and seals, tire balance, repair and rotation, break repair, and belt and hose replacement. The proposed building has an exterior of 100% masonry. The applicant has located the 3 bay doors to the north side of the building, Staff made this suggestion since there is an existing single family residence to the south, Lot 4R contains 27,384 square feet and is located south of the southern entrance on Davis Boulevard. The applicant is proposing to develop a one-story building (20' maximum height) containing 3,920 square feet. The applicant is required to provide 8 off-street parking spaces and is providing 28 spaces, The applicant is providing 6,641 square feet of landscape area, which is approximately 24% of the lot area, The shopping center landscape plan was approved prior to adoption of the latest Landscape Regulations on October 25, 1999, As a result there is only a 10 foot required landscape buffer strip along Davis Boulevard. Buffering along the entry driveway on the northern property line is not required by the landscape regulations, However, the Commission has the ability to require additional landscaping to provide additional screening or buffering as deemed necessary, A Special Use Permit is intended to provide flexibility by allowing certain types of uses in areas where special conditions may need to be considered to reduce adverse effects on adjacent or surrounding properties. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend safeguards or conditions of approval to reduce the effect on adjacent or surrounding properties, The City Council may, in the public welfare and to assure compliance with the intent of this Ordinance, require such development standards and safeguards as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission, Mr, Johnson stated that staff recommends approval of PZ 2000-07 with the condition that the site summary table on the site plan reflect the correct amount of landscaped area as shown on the landscape plan. P & Z Minutes March 9, 2000 5 Chairman Bowen opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come forward. Ms, Kitina Gilstrap, KPA Consulting, Inc, presented request. She explained that Albertson's would prefer the bay doors facing south, but due to staff concern, they were placed on the north side, Mr. Welch stated that he would prefer to see some of the parking on the south side relocated and the bay doors on the south side, Mr. Ernie Kennedy, Regency Realty for Albertson's, stated they would also prefer the building be shifted, stating that additional landscaping would not be a problem and they would also be willing to add a living screen along the south property line. Seeing no additional proponents, and no opponents, the public hearing was closed, Mr. Lueck, seconded by Mr. Blue, moved to Table PZ 2000-07 to the March 23, 2000 meeting, allowing the applicant time to bring back revised plans, which will include revised landscaping. The motion carried unanimously. P & Z Minutes March 9, 2000 6 ORDINANCE NO. 2470 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO AUTHORIZE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR AUTOMOBILE LUBRICATION CENTER AND MINOR AUTO REPAIR IN C1- COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by changing said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, in case number PZ 2000-07, a Special Use Permit be hereby authorized for Automobile Lubrication Center and Minor Auto Repair on property as described as Lot 4R, Block 4, Brentwood Estates (8401 Davis Boulevard) 2. THAT, development of this property shall be consistent with the site plan attached as Exhibit "A." 3. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section, Ordinance No, 2470 Page 1 of 3 4. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this Ordinance. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 23rd DAY OF MARCH, 2000. rJ /J'" ..-"\ /"';\ J >; ,'''' '. U\A/'"" yV .,I '"' . . i ¡/ ----; Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission -¡;; ,,~,~:,\. 5h Secretary, Planning and ~ing Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2000. Charles Scoma, Mayor City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Ordinance No, 2470 Page 2 of 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Ordinance No. 2470 Page 3 of 3 Received: 2/ 1/00 16:02; 817 427 630~ -> KPA Consu~ting Inc; Page 4 By: PLANNING INSPECTIONj__ 817 427 6303j F eb - i - 3:53PMj Page 4/5 CICy of North RJctII.nd Hills 7301 HE Laop 820 Nont'I Richland Hib, Texaa 817-581·5!500 Sent I NRH APPLICATION FORA SPECIAL USE PERMIT (PI.... Irtn or type" ~I ART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Naf7IfJ of ;JI)Þlicsnt I agent \ '/' {S 5CO re'flÇJhona number of applant I agent: q Surveyor map attached as requirtJd by application: ---, :--..! Yes ! I No AHidavit attached h'om propttffy owner if applicant is D YltS ~ No PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Current zoning classification: Proposed UIf of the property: 1 \ r --'",. WinDY Ú~{fJ_-fo ~f~ìrs q- ÚêC:l.ssc,iCS .......--.-- Attach site pl8/J which confQ s w· rsquirøments inClUded in this pscker: DNa Attach affidavit from propMty owne, ,f ap jcant is nol owner: o Y(ts D /110 I^ ,_ ç+ Dare: ~_I J . 2 QO_º- I Print Name: p 0 + Û+~ '/ n S I hereby certify Ih"t lam, 9f r'ØfN8BBf1J, theiegaJ OWM' r.1f t dNcriÞed above and do flereby submit thl. teqlJØ8t fer spp Sood.Uso~ -n;¡;;;:; SIgnature: ~ property val of a 1\:1, considfNllöon, PART 4. FOR OFFICE use ONLY Dale of Planning & ZDnmg Commiu/on PuÞlic Hearing: TaxN sid? I.:=J Yes 0 No plication will 170t be uled for puÞliC flAring plJcetJon '" ;IS rocoNetI. Date of City Council Public Hearing: ÜfMS PaiQ7 LJ Ye.s 0 No Spec/a; Use PermIt Approvt:Jd: [J YIIS : i No Conditions of AQQroval: ÁBHØmflnt:5 PI!I1d? DYes ;¡ No -.--......- ...,.~---..~.,. .--- ....--....- Spøçla se Permit ~' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/10/00 Subject: Request of GSBS Batenhorst for Site Plan Approval of Agenda Number: PZ 2000-08 commercial development within 200 feet of residential property on Lot 1, Block 1, Brentwood Estates Addition. The Property is Located at the Northwest Intersection of Shady Grove Road and Davis Boulevard. Case Summary GSBS Batenhorst has submitted a request for Site Plan Approval of a bank and drive through lane located within 200 feet of residential properties, The subject parcel is known as Lot 1, Block 1, Brentwood Estates Addition and is Located at the NWC of Shady Grove Road and Davis Boulevard. PZ 2000-11, also on this agenda, is a request for a Special Use Permit to allow exterior building materials other than masonry on the Summit Bank building. The subject parcel contains 1.4 acres (60,852 SF) and is zoned C-1 Commercial. The landscape regulations require 9,128 (15%) square feet of landscaping - the applicant is providing 21,734 square feet (35%). The applicant is providing at least 25 feet of landscaping along Davis and Shady Grove. A six-foot masonry wall and 15-foot landscape buffer with 3" caliper trees every 30 feet separates the residential/agricultural property to the west. The 6,500 square foot building is setback approximately 140 feet from the western residential property line. The parcel meets the requirements of the landscape regulations including parking lot percentage, parking lot screening, and parking islands. '- Access from Davis Boulevard will be shared with future commercial development to the north. There are 30 parking spaces provided where 22 are required. Their plan shows five drive through lanes. The Fire Marshall has reviewed the plan and has no concerns over fire access. There is a masonry retaining wall on the property that is setback 25 feet from Davis Boulevard and 40 feet from Shady Grove Road. The wall varies in height from six to nine feet and is approximately 230 feet in length. There is a sign mounted on the wall which staff is regulating as a wall sign. The section of the wall where the sign is located is approximately 500 square feet while the sign message area is approximately 75 square feet (15%). Wall signs are allowed to occupy 25% of the wall's surface area. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Oth r Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available ,,-. -~ Finance Director ~t~ L:\Cases\PZ Cases\2000\PZ 2000-08-41 Summit Bank Site Plan. doc Page 1 of 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RECOMMENDA TION: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on March 9, 2000, recommended approval by a vote of 7-0 of PZ 2000-08, Site Plan Approval for Summit Bank on Lot 1, Block 1, Brentwood Estates at 8612 Davis Boulevard. To approve PZ 2000-08 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. '- ,--. CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM L:\Cases\PZ Cases\PZ 99-46-42 SUP US Restaurant t"IUptml~tI.UUC Page 2 of 2 ~~---_._----- . PZ 2000-08 GSBS BA TENHORST SITE PLAN APPROVAL TIlIF AG 1IUA2I' RJAZP'I 1'!lW!n 11l1JAJ TIlt!) 13 2 12 1ROCT .. AG 11lŒI , LIMITS I 0 0 I~ 12 13 11lt\A4 Q TR.O 11<"", .. TIlUA I I 'I I [ - SHADY GROVE ROAD AG T1tOCT ... C-1 1198 ~-2 '222 c· 12 .y.'30 c-, TRACT 5A C-1 1664 TI;'......., ~ AG ~ TR.1U 111', _~3 -4 -4. :: :: 0 1-1 o · ... ,___ ~ 2059 z-- ... -~ 0 - ' > L__ 0 I _____ ~ ,-: i -t L-- a --j ... ; C II' '" ... Z r- '" ... - ç n ,~ ... I; A,ø 1 rt'\J<P<P '-'C \ ~\)\)~ J\'. AG TR.71) OJ,< --.- -------- - j '''1!!2 ~ r-1 'L _.' :~~ , ,_.._.'Ç_~,N{~~I:~ r' ,..1,-_--'.- I I \ I : I I I i cc::n::: I, ~_,._ . __.r~~~~:~~~~~_:=E~_c .-.:..-- ~\ C-1 1200 --..---- . -.-...------ N.aTH RICHLAND 8. PZ 2000-08 REQUEST OF GSBS BA TENHORST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL ON PROPOSED LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BRENTWOOD ESTATES ADDITION. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SHADY GROVE ROAD AND DAVIS BLVD AND IS WITHIN 200' OF RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY APPROVED Mr. Johnson explained that this site plan approval is for a bank and drive through lane located within 200' of residentially zoned property. The parcel contains 1.4 acres and is zoned C 1-Commercial. The applicant has provided landscaping on 35% of the lot where only 15% is required, There is at least 25 feet of landscaping along Davis Blvd and Shady Grove Road, A six-foot masonry screening wall and 15-foot landscape buffer with 3" caliper tress every 30 feet separates the residential/agricultural property to the west. The 6,500 square foot building is setback approximately 40 feet from the western property line. Access from Davis Blvd will be shared with future commercial development to the north, There are 30 parking spaces provided where 22 are required, There are plans for five drive through lanes, which has been reviewed by the fire marshal with no concern, A masonry-retaining wall, 25 feet from Davis Blvd and 40 feet from Shady Grove Road is proposed, The wall varies in height from six to nine feet and is approximately 230 feet long, Mr, Johnson stated that staff recommends approval of PZ 2000-08, Mr. Lueck, seconded by Mr. Blue, moved to approve PZ 2000-08 as presented. The motion carried unanimously. P & Z Minutes March 9, 2000 7 ~ City of North Richland Hills 7301 N,;, Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 817·581·5515 Property Location: - Street Address of Property: Legal Description of Property: w'- "l-Ot:> v - 05 Application for Site Plan Review NRH (PI_ ptiIt all'U¡X nSul N/A Lot 1, BJock 1 Brentwood Estates Property Owner Information: Name of Property Owner: Summit Community Bank - NA Phone No, 817-870-5200 Address of Property Owner: 9001 Airport Frwy., Suite 100 City: North RichJand HiJ Js State: T exa s lip: 76180 Applicant / Authorized Agent Information: "Note: An affidavit signed by the property owner is required when the agent is not the property owner" Name of Applicant / Authorized Agent: GSBS Batenhorst Inc. Phone No. 817-589-1722 Address: 7291 GJenview Drive City: North RichJand HilJs State: Texas ---- -.---- lip: 76180 Type of Site Plan Review: -X- Planned Development --- --.-..-- -_ ___n Specific Use Permit ..~ A-S- T T ownhomes A-7-MF Multi-familly Required Documents: The following table contains a checklist of the minimum items required for Site Plan Review. --------------- -2.:- P!a~wing exis~g & planned structures. bldg. lines. boundaries, and easements. R _ ~_,__, , f3.___.__ _ _,-.!i__,_ _ 2, T opographie information with centaurs drawn at two fool intervals, R R --.---. ..- -.. ._. ._-- ---- ------..... -.-----. 3, Elevation drawings at all buildings indicating the proposed exterior finish materials. R R R R ---..------ - "---. ---.------ 4. Landscaping, lighting, fencing. screening, and wall. indicating all heights. ,-------.!3._ _,_ __ Jin _ __ _ __ R___ -__.f!..__ .~:_.!:?_C~~~ndingress, _u________ __ _________ __ .__,~_, R F} _ ,. .,__!i__ 6, Off·street parking and loading facilities, R R .-------------.--- - -_. 7, All pedestrian walks. malls. and open areas, R R --_.. ----. ~.-..-.._-------- ~_!:~pos~~ uses indicating areas in square teet. _..____.. ___"_ _.. R R ,~~. Location & types at signs, including lighting and heights wilt! elevation drawings:_____.. ___ R R 10, Street names on proposed streets, R --.---..-----.-----... .-.-- c.!.!.... Existing & proposed water, sewer, & drainage systems; grading plan:______ _ _ ___'3 , 12. Engineering drawings of all public improvements to be de~i~ted~lt!e ~ity,__ ___._____, _'_ 13. Utility and drainage easements & location of solid waste disposal tacilfities. - ---- 14. Additional items as required by !tie City Council. ---------------.--.--- .. ------..- Note: ·R" = Required --..------ -----..S¡Jêëiãï--- ------ ----..---. Planned Use Townhomes Multi.family Oevelopm,:~ .___~~,_________,_ ___ . .- -- - --..---- - "'- - . R R . - __. 0- __ _ . R R R R R R R (Can be submitted at time of plat1ing) . . 0- _ . _ . .... .._. ~. R R R R R R I certify thaI I am, Qale: Site Plan Review Application s~.~~ 3 CD· 419 (2 " 98) ;;' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/10/00 Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of GSBS Agenda Number: PZ 2000-11 Batenhorst for a Special Use Permit to Allow Exterior Materials other than Masonry on a Proposed Bank Building on Proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Brentwood Estates Addition. The Property is Located at the Northwest Corner of Davis Boulevard & Shady Grove Road. Ordinance No. 2468 CASE SUMMARY GSBS Batenhorst is requesting a special use permit to allow materials other than masonry on a bank building. Section 605 of the Zoning Ordinance allows materials other than those specified in the masonry definition with the issuance of a Special Use Permit. Among other things, The provision is to provide for circumstances when an applicant seeks to advance the appearance of a development through the use of alternative materials. The property is located at the northwest intersection of Davis Boulevard and Shady Grove Road. This application applies to the same development, as does PZ 2000-08 Site Plan Review also being considered on the same agenda. The elevation drawings are attached. As shown, there is a significant amount of stucco and metal panels on the elevations. The masonry requirement in all commercial districts is 100%. The definition of masonry in the Zoning Ordinance does not include stucco: MASONRY - A form of approved construction composed of natural stone, rock, or brick, painted aggregate or exposed aggregate concrete, or split-faced concrete masonry block. As presented, the building shows approximately 42.4% masonry (brick) and 57.6% stucco and metal panel, not counting doors and glass. The applicant has provided a breakdown of material percentages, which is attached. Their numbers include glass, which the City does not count toward building material percentages. RECOMMENDA TION: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their public hearing on March 23, 2000, recommended approval by a vote of 7-0 of PZ 2000-11 for a Special Use Permit for materials other than masonry on Lot 1, Block 1, Brentwood Estates at the Northwest Corner of Davis Boulevard & Shady Grove Road. To approve Ordinance No. 2468 and PZ 2000-11 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot r 1~ ~ Account Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director ~á~ .',- L:\Cases\PZ Cases\2000\PZ 2000-11-42 SUP GSBS Summit Bank,doc Page 1 of 1 TlUA2I' PZ 2000-11 SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ALLOW NON-MASONRY EXTERIOR MATERIALS ,...~-....-.. __u n_....'__'___ '-"-."---. ...- TIlU rJUAZr1 TIIJA2I'2 T1UJD -13 2 12 TRACT IA lIlo.J D lIlŒI 'Y LlMtr. .~ II 51' ) ~ ,.----- f7 / II' TR.ßA4 / II fI -'-II .,. 19 AG o d 8 ~'1 '.~ :~A~' : SHADY GROVE ROAD C- 12 -~:--f TR.1J lIlOA \J JJ 14 15 11 fI 11 R-2 1Il48 1222 11!ACT .. C-1 1198 " C-1 1254 TRACT ,'ó- TRACT .A2 1Il4>.3 'Yo?,Q 1Il4C c-, TRACT SA C-1 1664 TR.oM, 1Il5 AG \ \ \ yO" '/ oJ~ 1: ~9-Il,~ -- -4 -4 :J: :: 0 \II '" -4 Z .- "" "' Õ n C') -4 "' 0 '" ¡,,?ßß?, 1 ,\\Jt:>t:> ,-,C -- ~\)\)~ ~\'- / ! -4---- .m.__:J: ~ - ~ 1-11 o Z -2059 '" ---'" 1 Z -----. "" ~ 0 --'- ~'--'---I"-- ~ n l n --- -4 _,{---4 I AG 1Il7t) TIUA - ---- - -- . 3 - 1Il7B C-1 1200 'C H_____. . _~_.._____. ~9RNDAI:E ____,_äT _ _,uL _ _ ..-==L 7 N.JlTH ltICHLAND 10. PZ 2000-11 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF GSBS BA TENHORST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW EXTERIOR MATERIALS OTHER THAN MASONRY, INCLUDING STUCCO & METAL PANELS, ON PROPOSED LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BRENTWOOD ESTATES ADDITION. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SHADY GROVE RD AND DAVIS BLVD. APPROVED This is a continuation of a public hearing that was held on March 9, 2000, GSBS Batenhorst is requesting a special use permit to allow materials other than masonry on a bank building proposed to be located at the northwest intersection of Davis Boulevard and Shady Grove Road. The item was tabled to allow the applicant an opportunity to prepare color renderings for the Commission's consideration and to clarify building material percentages. The elevation drawings show a significant amount of stucco and metal panels on the elevations, The masonry requirement in all commercial districts is 100%. The definition of masonry in the Zoning Ordinance does not include stucco. As presented, the building shows approximately 42.4% masonry (brick) and 57.6% stucco and metal panel, not counting doors and glass, The applicant has provided a breakdown of material percentages. Their numbers include glass, which the City does not count toward building material percentages. Staff recommended approval of PZ 2000-11, a Special Use Permit to allow materials other than masonry as shown on the attached exhibit "A" on proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Brentwood Estates, Mr, Tom Batenhorst presented this request, showing computer-generated renderings of the proposed bank, explaining that when the City adopted the masonry requirements in November of 1999 the construction drawings were already underway. They were unaware of the revision to the masonry requirements. Examples of the material proposed were shown explaining that the metal panels proposed are made of brushed aluminum. This product is also proposed for the interior to conceal a dropped HVAC system. Seeing no more proponents and no opponents, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Davis, seconded by Mr. Welch, moved to approve PZ 2000-11. The motion carried unanimously. P & Z Minutes March 23, 2000 12 NRH City of North RIchland HOIa .PPLICA TION FOR A 7301 NE loop 820 SPECIAL USE PERMIT North RIchland Hills, Texas (Pre.. pr1nt 01' type ." 18S )Or1Ht) 817-581-5500 PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION ame of applicant / agent: GSBS Batenhorst Inc ¡¡:;;-- "eSS of applicant / agent 72q1 GJenview Drive ity / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent Telephone number of applicant / agent: N. RichJand Hi J J 5, TX 76180 817-589-1722 / PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION ,me of property owner: . ." S umm i t Community Bank, N. A. reet address of property owner: qnn1 A i mort Freewav. Suite 100 Iy / State I Zip Code of property owner: Telephone number of property owner: North RichJand Hi J 15, TX 76180 817-870-5200 )te: Attach letter or afñdavit from property owner if different from applicant I agent . rvey or map attached as required by application: Afñdavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner: ::::J Yes [2] No /2J Yes 0 No ::tART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST rrent zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: C - 1 Branch BanI< 'for Summit Bank . scribe the nature of the proposed activity and any parlicular characteristics related to the use of the property: Drive thru/wàJk up Bank FaciJ ity - 3ch site plan which conforms with requirements included in this packet: Attach affidavit from property owner if applicant is not owner: DYes [ßNO Q] Yes DNo tl, {1.or:> I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the property described above and do hereby submit this request for approval of a late: Special U~e Permit to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration, I,,~ ' "ì . 11 f()H n *:~" -""'-\1'1 '~àj~ -L"'" ~ ~\' - 'rint Name: ~/ Signature: '~~vT ~.,\\j~::> ~ ~ 'ART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY e of Planning & Zoning Commission Public Hearing: Taxes Paid? Case Number: DYes DNo ~- ;;2coo . ocr e of City Council Public Hearing: Uens Paid? Fee: DYes DNa 'cial Use Permit Approved: Assessments Paid? $300.00 DYes DNa DYes DNO Iditions of Approval: This application will not be scheduled for public hearing until application," is received. - $þecial Use Permit CD - 414 (2196) .._.__.,.._..--.-..__.~_._-------------- ORDINANCE NO. 2468 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO AUTHORIZE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW EXTERIOR MATERIALS OTHER THAN MASONRY IN A C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by changing said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, in case number PZ 2000-11, a Special Use Permit be hereby authorized to allow exterior building materials other than masonry on property known as Lot 1, Block 1, Brentwood Estates Addition in a district zoned "C-1" Commercial. 2. THAT, the exterior building elevations on this property shall be consistent with the attached Exhibit "A." 3. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. Ordinance No. 2468 Page 1 of 3 4. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this Ordinance. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2000. "..-~ ,/ / i /4 /~~~. Secretary, Planning andZo ~á!~ Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 10th DAY OF APRIL, 2000. ATTEST: Charles Scoma, Mayor City of North Richland Hills, Texas City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Ordinance No. 2468 Page 2 of 3 - .._._,".~"_. "...~"-'--~-"'--_._--- APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ~s:- Attorney fofthe City Ordinance No, 2468 Page 3 of 3 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/10/00 Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Doskocil Food Agenda Number: PZ 2000-09 Service Companies for a Special Use Permit to Allow Exterior Materials other than Masonry on an addition to an existing facility on Lot AR-1, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition in an 12-lndustrial District. The Property is Located at 6350 Browning Court. Ordinance No. 2467 Case Summary Doskocil Food Service Companies is requesting a Special Use Permit to Allow Exterior Materials other than Masonry on an addition to an existing facility on Lot AR-1, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition in an 12-lndustrial District. The Property is Located at 6350 Browning Court The application is to add 13,414 square feet to an existing 173,036 square foot building. The addition's building materials would be consistent with the existing building's metal panels. The masonry requirement in all commercial districts, including Industrial, is 100%. MASONRY - A form of approved construction composed of natural stone, rock, or brick, painted aggregate or exposed aggregate concrete, or split-faced concrete masonry block. Section 605 of the Zoning Ordinance allows materials other than those specified in the masonry definition with the issuance of a Special Use Permit. When appropriate, the provision is to allow non-masonry additions to existing buildings that are not constructed with masonry. This is an industrial building in an industrial district and located on a dead- "-.' end cul-de-sac street. The additions face away from the street and toward undeveloped industrially zoned property to the rear. RECOMMENDA TION: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their public hearing on March 23, 2000, recommended approval by a vote of 7-0 of PZ 2000-09 for a Special Use Permit for materials other than masonry on Lot AR-1, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition at 6350 Browning Court, To approve Ordinance No. 2467 and PZ 2000-09 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev,) Operating Budget Ot r Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director ead Signature ~t~ \\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1\DATA\PZ\Cases\PZ Cases\2000\PZ 2000-09-41 SUP HM Foods.doc Page 1 of 1 -- ~ £ ~uuu-u~n REZONING REQUEST 6350 BROWNING CT. 8_Ql.( lo M~__ __~__ -~J }t I:J , ! I , UM'TS 81 ! lID ! NOITH I'CH I I J J J I I I I ) · I J J · I · · ) · 1 I 1-2 1194 ~ 111.1: 3 : ~. ., IRA · I BROWNING DRIVE u :168 ' 1R2'2 PD-23 2171 ""'u 2J68 TR.:Z TR.2J 1-2 , . LLS CITY LIMITS .,. - 7 /3" / / BROWNING CT ~s'\\t\þ.\;, \~~ 7J.\.\.~ 1-2 2 T1tWG 1Il1D1 ~~ O~ , Q<) ~~ ~ R TRB.J.J B..R_~~~e R:I < fI-1A2 þ.~~~ ? þ.\t~ - \~~. 'Z.\\,\.~-6 TR1I3 1-2 :: ... ... """ -I 0 ~ 0 '" 3 HIØ8iIiØ_Ð'R- ~'t\~? ~þ..~~ 2 R-7-MF þ.\) n.þ,~ þ,..... ~'t\~? '\ þ.. 1ì~ þ.\)v /I,\.~ 1 102 C-2 R '111.10 C-2 ,..50 1Il8 .--..--.----- .----.------------¡;:¡. .-. --.- -. .- - 8. PZ 2000-09 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF DOSKOCIL FOOD SERVICE COMPANIES FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW EXTERIOR MATERIALS OTHER THAN MASONRY ON AN ADDITION IN AN 12-INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 6350 BROWNING CT. APPROVED Doskocil Food Service Companies is requesting a Special Use Permit to Allow Exterior Materials other than Masonry on an addition to an existing facility on Lot AR-1, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition in an 12-lndustrial District. The Property is Located at 6350 Browning Court The application is to add 13,414 square feet to an existing 173,036 square foot building, The addition's building materials would be consistent with the existing building's metal panels. The masonry requirement in all commercial districts, including Industrial, is 100%, Section 605 of the Zoning Ordinance allows materials other than those specified in the masonry definition with the issuance of a Special Use Permit. When appropriate, the provision is to allow non-masonry additions to existing buildings that are not constructed with masonry, This is an industrial building in an industrial district and located on a dead-end cul-de-sac street. The additions face away from the street and toward undeveloped industrially zoned property to the rear, Staff recommends approval of PZ 2000-11, a Special Use Permit to allow materials other than masonry as shown on the attached exhibit "An on Lot AR-1, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition, Vice Chairman Blue opened the public hearing, Mr. Tom Rutledge - Teague Nail & Perkins and Mr, Bill Hackett - Doskocil Food Service Companies presented request explaining that the requested addition is proposed to match the existing facility in color and material. Seeing no additional proponents and no opponents, the hearing was closed, Mr, Tolbert stated that he is in favor of the masonry requirements recently passed and will be voting in favor of this request because of it's unique situation and it is unseen from the public, Mr. Laubacher, seconded by Mr. Nehring, moved to approve PZ 2000-09. The motion carried unanimously. P & Z Minutes March 23, 2000 10 ORDINANCE NO. 2467 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO AUTHORIZE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW EXTERIOR MATERIALS OTHER THAN MASONRYH IN A 1-2 INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No, 1874 by changing said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, in case number PZ 2000-09, a Special Use Permit be hereby authorized to allow exterior building materials other than masonry on property known as Lot AR-1, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition in a district zoned "1-2" Industria/located at 6350 Browning Court. 2. THAT, the exterior building elevations on this property shall be consistent with the attached Exhibit "A." 3. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section, 4. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this Ordinance, Ordinance No, 2467 Page 1 of 2 "^__ _~_._,~_______~~_.__~"__"__H'''__''___._''__.._'_''''__~.'~ 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 23rd DAY OF MARCH, 2000. Secretary, Planning &rt!1 ~ ~~:) Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission .--/ " I /l /" 4' Æ;f'" /..',t,.... ./'.... '. ..," .~ .. : ",- '\ /,;.,~,,~)- ;~/.,f1' PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 10th DAY OF APRIL, 2000. Charles Scoma, Mayor City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Ordinance No, 2467 Page 2 of 2 ,. NRH APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT City of North Rich/and Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Rich/and Hills, Texas 817-581-5500 l I ¡ (Please print or type aU responses) PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant / agent: r ,kocil Food Service Companies ~. address of applicant / agent: 6350 Browning Court City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: Telephone number of applicant / agent: North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION (817)514-3593 Name of property owner: Doskocil Food Service Companies Street address of property owner: 6350 Browning Court City / State / Zip Code of property owner: -II Telephone number of property owner: North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Note; Attach letter or affidaVit from property owner If different from applicant / agent: (817) 514-3593 Surveyor map attached as required by application: -- ¡No '----' Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner: Ii Yes I! No :X . Yes PART 3, DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Current zoning classification; Proposed use of the property: 1-2 Food Processing Plant Descnbe the nature of the proposed activity and any particular characteristics related to Ihe use of the property; r , owner is planning to expand the existing plant by approximately 13,400 S.F. ------------------..-----.--------.---.------.--..----_. -- --- The exterior finish of the proposed additions is planned to match the existing building. .- Attach site plan which conforms with requirements included lri this packet: ixi Yes III! No .- ::> // ..,." / &:' t:J I hereby certify that I am, or represent. the legal owner of the property ~~ ~ ~ þ1 ~ - descnbed above and do hereby submit this request for approval of a Date.~ ./ -4/"&- :............. ~ _ _ ~ Special Use Permit to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration - ~ Pnnt Name, Bill Hacke t t Signature Attach affidavit from property owner If applicant IS not owner n Yes íj No I' '-_-----J --------_. .--- -- --'-- ---'- --"--.-.-- -. --. ------ -~ -------~_._. u_ ___ -- PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Planmng & Zonmg CommissIon PublIc Heanng: Taxes Paid? Yes No C:;Yl' ~.tf? Fee' -- --, -' Date of City Council Public Heanng Liens PaId? , Yes ! No -, SpecIal Use Permit Approved Yes No Assessments PaId? Yes $300,00 No CondItIons of Approval ---.., -. --- - .. - ., , - ThIs application WI/I not be scheduled for pubf¡c heanng until applica/lon fee IS receIved Special Use Permit CO - 414 (2/96) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/10100 Subject: Request of Teague, Nail, & Perkins, Inc. for a Replat Agenda Number: PS 2000-06 to be known as Lot A-R1, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition. The property is located at the southwest intersection of Wuliger Way and Browning Court. CASE SUMMARY Request of Teague, Nail, & Perkins, Inc. for a Replat that would combine three lots into one. The existing three lots are Lot A-R, Lot 5RA, and Lot 5R1, Industrial Park Addition. The property is zoned 12-lndustrial and is located at the southwest intersection of Wuliger Way and Browning Court. The existing Lot A-R is currently developed with a large industrial building. The purpose of the replat is to allow an expansion of the operation while still meeting the parking requirements which must be provided on the same parcel as the primary use. The total acreage that will result on the proposed Lot A-R 1 is 11.056 acres. The applicant, in their memo dated March 14 (attached), has responded to the comments in the Public Works memo dated March 13 (attached). The remaining comments noted by Public Works concern requirements for engineering and construction plans and are not associated with the plat. RECOMMENDA TION: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on March 23, 2000, recommended approval of PS 2000-06 a replat to be known as Lot A-R 1, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition by a vote of 7 to 0 with the following conditions: 1. A written agreement between the applicant and the adjacent property owners to the west is received acknowledging cooperation in developing drainage improvements, plans and or easements to alleviate the drainage issues on Browning Court. 2. Subject to the Engineer's comments 3. Waiving the required sidewalks along Browning Court. To approve PS 2000-06 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available -¡ ~ Finance Director ~~~ L:\Cases\PS Cases\2000 Plats\PS 2000-06-41 Lot AR1 Ind Park.doc Page 1 of 1 - -l:""- Lft " 1R2IIIA WA -.. .. ,J:J I HALTOM CI j '4 , I~ t8 17 , t8 ]. , , I · i I · .. I .. · I t8 17 ,. T1U UI It ]. 12 ICHLAND HILLS CITY LIMITS HAL-TGM-(!·I1"Y-HWnS . PD-23 2171 U 2168 1-2 2168 ~, //- PS 2000-06 REPLAT LOT AR-1, BLOCK 3 INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION ..", . d t ItI :RAJ 1-2 1-2 119. !RA. JR.e ~S~~\~\.. 3 \~\) 2\\\';) ø-" ,~ .- 5RA 1-2 /:' 2 :lOA IR. ~<::> Q)V 9:-~ q~ y ~~ ~" ~~ ~ /',,-- '" < 11U'2 PO·23 2171 "'-8JJ RRJ~~ :: r- r- "'" R-I"'2 1-2 -I ? Þ- ?~ nUl3 0 ." \~\J c '" TR.2 ~<::>~ ~N : *' : ~ ~\\~ ! ~ ~ ¡"??~I V 2 ¡..\)\)! ~ I .\,\~.\,~¡ !-..~ R-7-MFi ~~ ~ -8.Q.(¡( ___:'J__~1~__ - .. .--- --- - J.< 2 R-7-MF '\\:\t. '\ þ.?f , þ.\JDtI .\,\,3~·3 1 "2 TIl.. C-2! 1!12J 1"5~ -- -- -.--..--- 1-2 TIl8 - - ¡f 6. PS 2000-06 CONSIDER REQUEST OF TEAGUE NALL & PERKINS, INC, FOR A REPLA T TO BE KNOWN AS LOT AR1, BLOCK 3, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION. THE PROPERTY IS LOCA TED AT THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF WULlGER WAY AND BROWNING CT. APPROVED Request of Teague, Nail, & Perkins, Inc. for a Replat that would combine three lots into one. The existing three lots are Lot A-R, Lot 5RA, and Lot 5R 1, Industrial Park Addition. The property is zoned 12-lndustrial and is located at the southwest intersection of Wuliger Way and Browning Court, The existing Lot A-R is currently developed with a large industrial building. The purpose of the replat is to allow an expansion of the operation while still meeting the parking requirements which must be provided on the same parcel as the primary use, The total acreage that will result on the proposed Lot A-R1 is 11,056 acres, The applicant has responded to the comments in the Public Works memo dated March 13, The remaining comments noted by Public Works concern requirements for engineering and construction plans and are not associated with the plat. Staff recommends approval of PS2000-06, a Replat to be known as Lot A-R 1, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition, subject to the engineer's comments regarding engineering and construction plans. Mr. Davis stated that water is currently being dumped onto Browning Ct - which has no drainage improvements in it. He stated that the street is continually overflowed and dumped to the west, where as he understands it - they don't have permission to do so, Mr, Scott Gibson, Teague Nail & Perkins stated that the expansion of the building would be over existing pavement, so the runoff will not be increased, The lot to the north is where the drainage issue will be addressed, which is forthcoming, Mr, Davis is concerned that the Commission has no assurance the lot to the north will ever be replatted and he asked staff if the drainage topo of Lot AR-1 shows that a portion of that lot flows into Browning CT, stating he realizes that part of it will go south. Mr. Kevin Miller, Assistant Director of Public Works, stated that the drainage criteria today doesn't provide an avenue to require the developer to do any additional improvements if they are not generating any additional water. Once P & Z Minutes March 23, 2000 6 additional runoff is generated, they are required to verify that the runoff has a place to go. Mr. Tolbert asked Mr, Miller if the street right-of-way could handle any additional runoff, Mr, Miller stated that he hasn't looked at the drainage calculations for that. Mr, Tom Rutledge, Teague Nail & Perkins, explained that they have met with the downstream property owner, Howe & Wood, to discuss and rectify the drainage issue. A Drainage Easement from Howe & Wood and a commitment from H & M Foods will be required before a resolution can be obtained, The final decision will be made after meeting with staff to ensure that it meets City criteria, This plat being considered is strictly for the building expansion, stating that if the Commission desires, approval could be contingent on a drainage agreement being in place prior to City Council consideration. Mr, Davis stated that these assurances are very comforting and verified with staff that an acknowledge from the downstream property owners would be acceptable, Mr. Davis, seconded by Mr. Tolbert, moved to approve PS 2000-06 subject to engineers comments, waiving the sidewalks and requiring the adjacent property owners to the west, in conjunction with applicant, to provide acknowledgment of their cooperation in developing drainage improvements, plans and easements to resolve the drainage issues on Browning Court. The motion carried unanimously. P & Z Minutes March 23, 2000 7 APR-0S-2000 11:00 TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS 8173362813 P.02/02 Rebel Properties ß, L TD 1845 Precinct Line Rd. Hurst, Texas 76054 (817) 581-9015 March 31, 2000 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 N. Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: Drainase Improvements Needed on Browning Cl Dear M!iyor and Council: H & M Foods has nsked US to write this letter to you to confirm that we are currently negotiating drainage improvements, which need to be made to handle the drainage problems on BroW'lling Court. We own the 32:t acre tract to the west of and doWrtstrearn &om H '" ~ Fo~ds. . Currently there are no drainage facilities in Browning Court. A significant amount of water flows into Browning Ct. from the H " M property and then flows west onto our property. As development of the H It. M site bas increase~ so has the flow dfwater. We have had several meetings with representatives ofH &. M Foods and their engineers. They recognize there is a problem and we believe they are dealing in good faith we are hopeful we can come to a resolution of all the issues soon. However, at this time, we have not given our approval 10 ÐCiCept any more water without proper facilities to handle it being put in place. Plœse feel nee to call if you have any quesûons. Sincerely. z~f( T'r.,.rr\1 ~ n""" " /Ill!! r!t;!!su.~ut!~~f. ~~~A!!f:!!f!'!r~ Ms. Marcy Ratcliff Director of Planning City of North Richland Hills 7301 N,E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 March 14, 2000 Re: HMF 00127- H&M Foods City Staff Comments Dear Ms. Ratcliff: We have reviewed and addressed the city staff comments, dated March 13, 2000, for PS2000-06; INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION, BLOCK 3, LOT AR-l. The following are our responses to the items of consideration: 1, EASMENT ABANDONMENT - This item has been addressed on the Plat. 2, UTILITY EASMENTS - This item has been addressed on the Plat. 3, DRAINAGE EASMENTS - This item has been addressed on the Plat. 4, ROW DEDICATION - This item is being coordinated with Public Works, 5. DRAINAGE - This item has been addressed. 6. SIGNATURES - This item has been addressed on the Plat. The surveyor's seal and signature will appear, along with the Owner's signatures, on the Final Plat Mylar after the City Council's approval. 7, SIDEW ALKS - A waiver is requested for this item due to existing conditions and obstructions, Also, no sidewalks are located on developed lots surrounding the site, 8. STREET LIGHTING - This item is being coordinated with Public Works and TXU Electric. 915 Fl.ORE:NCE STREET FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 (817) 336-5773 FAX (817) 336-2813 9, IINSPECTION FEES - This item will be provided prior to the start March 14, 2000 HMFOOl27 - H&M Foods City Staff Comments Also submitted with this letter are 15 copies of the Plat and Site Plan for the Planning and Zoning Commission's review and consideration. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this project, please feel rree to call. Sincerely, TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC. 5~4.G~ Scott A. Gibson SAG/sag Enclosure xc: Bill Hackett, H&M FOODS Mike Jones, TNP Q:\PROJ- R 14\HMFOO 127\docs\staff-response.doc NI~H J)~ '" ublic Works I Administration CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS March 13, 2000 MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Julia W, Skare, P.E. Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS2000-06; INDUSTRJAL PARK ADDTION, BLOCK 3, LOT AR-1 We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on March 13, 2000, The following items are for your consideration. 1, EASEMENT ABANDONMENT Easements dedicated by previous plat may be abandoned by plat. Public Works grid maps do not indicate water or sanitary sewer mains located in the easements proposed to be abandoned. 2, UTILITY EASEMENTS All existing water meters, fire hydrants and detector check vaults, as well as water and sanitary sewer mains are to be contained in a utility, waterline or sanitary sewer easement. All required easements appear to be dedicated, 3, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS A minimum of 7.5 feet is required on each side of the pipe and a minimum of 5'-0 from the outside edge of the structures. It appears the required easement has been dedicated, 4, ROW DEDICATION Provide dimensions on the site plan to verify there is a minimum of 9,5 feet from the back of curb to the ROW line on the perimeter of the property, 5. DRAINAGE The plans indicate the grading of the lot will not be affected with this plat. The quantity of impervious area will not be increased, therefor Public Works does not feel a Drainage Analysis or grading plan is required with this Plat. 6. SIGNATURES The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Ovvner's Acknowledgment and Dedication on the Final Plat. In addition, the surveyors seal and signature needs to be added to the mylar of the Final Plat. 7. SIDEWALKS The Subdivision Regulations require sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. The site plan does not indicate existing sidewalks. The sidewalks shall be shovvn on the construction plans if a waiver is not granted, PO. Box 820609 . North Richland Hills, Texas· 76182.0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820' 817·427·6400· FAX 817·427.6404 PS2000-06, Industrié. ark Addition, Block 3, Lot AR-1 March 13, 2000 Page 2 of 2 8, STREET LIGHTING Street Lighting is required by Section 1-06 of the Design Manual. The locations of any existing streetlights need to be shown on the topographical drawing or site plan to confirm compliance with current ordinances. The legend provided on the site plan is not legible. Any additional streetlights which may be required based on current ordinances, needs to be coordinated with Public Works and TXU Electric. The cost for installation of any additional streetlights will be paid by the developer directly to TXU Electric. 9. INSPECTION FEES Inspection fees will be due prior to starting construction. The rate is four (4%) percent of the construction cost of the water main for Final plats received prior to March 3, 2000, The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. (~~1~,Jr, ~ JWS tcd/pwm2000-O)*6 cc: Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Public Works Director Kevin B. Miller, P,E., Assistant Public Works Director City of North Richland Hills Developer Information Packet 12-31-99 APPLICATION FOR PLATTING CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS TYPE OF PLAT: _Preliminary _Final ~Replat _Amendment _Short Form Final PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Name of Addition: Industrial Park Addition Location of Addition: Lot A-Rl. Block 3 Number of Lots: 1 Gross Acreage:ll . 06 Zoning: I-2 PROPERTY OWNER: Name:Doskocil Food Service Companies Address: 6300 Browning Court State: Texas Zip: 76180 Signature:~A!'~~~~ APPLICANT: Contact Bill Hackett CR~ North Richland Hills Phone:(817)514-3593 Fax: (817)514-3591 Email: Name: Property Owner Address: State: Zip: Contact: City: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: SURVEYOR: Name:Teague NaIl & Perkins, Inc. Address: 915 Florence Street State: Texas ;iP: , 76~ Signature: ~LII( , ENGINEER: Contact Steve Roberson City: Fort Worth Phone: (817)336-5773 Fax: (817) 336-2813 Email:sroberson@tnp-online.com Name:Teague NaIl & Perkins. Inc. Address: 915 Florence State: Texas Contact: Tom Rutledge City: Fort Worth Phone: (817)336-5773 Fax{817)336-2813 Email: trutledge@tnp-online.com PRINCIPLE CONTACT: _Owner _Applicant _Surveyor ~Engineer (Staff comment letters and mark-ups will be distributed only to the designated principle contact.) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application Received: Fee Amount: $ Case No. By: Check Number: HTE No, Page 8 of 30 76 ;Jew· c0 " CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/10/00 Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Dunaway Agenda Number: PZ 2000-10 Associates, Inc. for a Zoning Change on Lot 1, Block 1, Shady Grove Baptist Church from U-Institutional to C1-Commercial and Several Tracts in the Thomas Peck Survey, Abstract No. 1210 on the North Side of Shady Grove Road from AG-Agricultural to C1- Commercial. Located at 8241 Precinct Line Road and 8700 Block of Shady Grove Road. Ordinance No. 2471. CASE SUMMARY Mr. Tom Galbreath of Dunaway Associates, Inc has submitted a request to rezone property from U-Institutional and AG-Agricultural to C1-Commercial. The request includes Lot 1, Block 1, Shady Grove Baptist Church containing 2.777 currently zoned U- Institutional and several tracts on the north side of Shady Grove Road containing 7.32 acres currently zoned AG-Agricultural. A total of 10.09 acres of property is requested to change to C 1-Commercial. The properties are currently developed with the Shady Grove Baptist Church and two single-family residences. The applicant plans to submit a preliminary plat in the next month for these properties and additional land west to Davis Boulevard. Eventually, the applicant intends to submit requests to develop the property with a Wal Mart Supercenter. The properties immediately north of the agriculturally zoned tracts were rezoned in 1999 by Mr, John Barfield from AG-Agricultural to C1-Commercial (PZ 99-18). SURROUNDING FUTURE LAND USES The subject property is designated as Commercial. North: South: East: West: Future Land Use Commercial Commercial City of Colleyville Commercial Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget o her Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director -~ ~~~.d£: \\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1 \DA TA\Pz\Cases\PZ Cases\2000\PZ 2000-10-41 Dunaway-Wal Mart.doc Page 1 of 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RECOMMENDA TION: At their Public Hearing of March 23, 2000, by a vote of 7-0, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of PZ 2000-10 to rezone Lot 1 Block 1, Shady Grove Baptist Church from U-Institutional to C1-Commercial and Several Tracts in the Thomas Peck Survey, Abstract No, 1210 on the North Side of Shady Grove Road from AG- Agricultural to C 1-Commercial. To approve Ordinance 2471 and PZ 2000-13 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Document6 Page 2 of 2 -,-~ . ---;¡¡:¡¡¡--- T1UI< -J.'-~ : .3->'u 1!UC1' ,. 1R.Œ ftw W .. \16IMi ¡... liB' :; .. .. Ie Ü .. :J IT > .. III :111 11 II 2D = 2 II: C-1 ~q7 I1t.ŒI 1II.11C2 '""I:T1I C-1 1675 C-11 125" ! T1lœ 1Il'04 '""I:T" 1R.Ol:f 411 1R.Ol:f :!A '. TRACT :!A1 nw:r :!AI 1RACT JC1 ~'\<ßS I.'tS'\ / NO RTH TARRANT PKWY fR.OCf .B 1RACT :!C1 PZ 2000-10 - ZONE CHANGE REQUEST DUNAWAY ASSOCIATES FROM "U" AND "AG" TO "C-1" ~\) - '""I:T~ C-1 166<4 - mæ f!UIC fRl£ nut< l1lIIF fRlD AG TR4 1MC I I n~l I ... me:: ------~-- \. ___--!!!.tDrmatlon SerwlC8. _ crs ftl"I.:'-:;-~-;-;-;;:;;-:;::~- 1'a1D TRSC "'-'B CII ". ~ TRØ: TT<5 r-fRl£---'-'IRSI TIU 11<5 'IUD ~ TR3< fII6 fRJ!D TR!Ii 11U!E 1R5J n ... G I I ~ TUQ - f1UIC2 ""-- ~ .iJdiÃ~T.-, I ~ \!.\ø~c\\ I ~ ~'\ 'Ý'ø i11lJC Iftm 1111 'TIll 1 1 I MURPHY RD 140\ III L4 = Ie '" II 17 12 III U 10 Z1 :3 :!% 23 U 25 æ 'l:7 æ SCHOOL . '!ILIA TRUl TILW2 T1UA8 TIUW " 2 2 TIU.\% TltWO TlUA8A TlUA8IJ .. .. ~ .. .. ü .. ... ... :: c z < ... = 11 iii .. .. ~ .. .. ü .. ... oJ :> .. .. ... ... o 11 :I: . o z m1J !lUll TR.SI 9. PZ 2000-10 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF DUNAWAY ASSOCIATES INC, FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SHADY GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH FROM U-INSTITUTIONAL TO C1-COMMERCIAL AND SEVERAL TRACTS IN THE THOMAS PECK SURVEY, A-1210 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SHADY GROVE ROAD FROM AG-AGRICUL TURAL TO C1- COMMERCIAL. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 8241 PRECINCT LINE ROAD AND THE 8700 BLOCK OF SHADY GROVE ROAD. APPROVED Mr, Tom Galbreath of Dunaway Associates, Inc has submitted a request to rezone property from U-Institutional and AG-Agricultural to C1-Commercial. The request includes Lot 1 Block 1, Shady Grove Baptist Church containing 2,777 currently zoned U-Institutional and several tracts on the north side of Shady Grove Road containing 7,32 acres currently zoned AG-Agricultural. A total of 10.09 acres of property is requested to change to C1-Commercial. The properties are currently developed with the Shady Grove Baptist Church and two single-family residences. The applicant plans to submit a preliminary plat in the next month for these properties, plus additional land to the west over to Davis Boulevard, Eventually, the applicant intends to submit requests to develop the property with a Wal-Mart Supercenter. If the Commission recommends approval of this zoning change it will be forwarded to City Council tentatively on April 1 0, 2000. The properties immediately north of the agriculturally zoned tracts were rezoned in 1999 by Mr, John Barfield from AG-Agricultural to C1-Commercial (PZ 99-18), Ms, Ratcliff explained staff recommended approval of PZ 2000-10, Vice Chairman Blue opened the public hearing, Mr, Tom Galbreath, Dunaway Associates, presented this request explaining that this project combines 38 acres from Precinct Line Road to Davis Blvd and down to North Tarrant Parkway; 21 acres will be utilized by Wal-Mart, Seeing no additional proponents and no opponents, the public hearing was closed, Ms, Ratcliff stated that one letter of approval had been received in this case and was included in the Commissioners packets, Mr. Davis, seconded by Mr. Welch, moved to approve PZ 2000-10. The motion carried unanimously. P & Z Minutes March 23, 2000 11 City of North Richland Hills NI~H APPLlCA TION FOR A 7301 NE Loop 820 ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE North Rich/and Hills, Texas (Please pnnt or type all responses) 817-581-5500 PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION I I Name of applicant / agent: , _,maway Associates, Inc. I Street address of applicant / agent: I 1501 Merrimac Circle. Suite 100 I City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: Telephone number of applicant / agent: Fort Worth, Texas 76107 (817) 335-1121 I PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION I Street address at location where zoning district change is being requested: I ; NEC. North Tarrant Pkwy. & Davis Blvd. Legal Description of Property where zoning district change is being requested: Attached Current zoning classification: Proposed zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: AG - Agricultural C-1 r.ommercial u - InstitutionéW. District Grocery/Retail Reason for zoning district change: To allow for a Wal-Mart Supercenter with retai 1 and a full line grocery store. Surveyor map attached as required by application: Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner: [J[] Yes i ! No WYes 0 No PART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of property owner: . *All actual owners names and )kens Company / Steve Harriman, Representative signatures, attached. Slfeet address of property owner: 2300 Airport Freeway, Suite 230 City / State / Zip Code of property owner: Telephone number of property owner: Bedford, TX 76022 (817) 571-4114 Note: Attach letter or affidavit from property owner if different from applicant / agent: Attached I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the property t-- i~-ro described above and do hereby submit this request for approval of a Date: zonze (J~ Pie/rend 7/ Comml..~n ~"on,~era"on Print Name: Tom Galbreath Signature: \f ~ ........'.1L-\.. A f~ , - PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONlY· Date of Planning & Zoning Commission Public Hearing: Taxes Paid? Cft DYes DNo ~00ù' (0 Date of City Council Public Hearing: Fee: DYes DNO Zoning District Change Approved: $300.00 ¡¡Yes DNo DYes DNo Conditions of Approval: This application will not be scheduled for public hearing - until application fee is received. Zoning District Change CD - 407 (2/97) Case #: PZ 2000-10 DUNAWAY ASSOCIATES INC. MAR 11 2000 Procedure to Respond: As a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract or an interested citizen, I (approve) (protest) and/or (have the following comments): Print Name- ~~-/írlff I/øif- Phone No.: ðJ? I ,-¡;'d1¿J stions and mail responses to: Planning Department City of North Richland Hills, Texas 7301 N E Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Telephone: (817) 427-6300 Fax: (817) 427-6303 \\NRH_ CITY _ HALL2\VOLl \DA T A \PZ\Property Owner Notificatin\PZ 2000-10 Dunaway Associates,doc ORDINANCE NO. 2471 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2, SECTION 200, OF ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 10, 2000; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a change in zoning district boundaries; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No, 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, in Case Number PZ 2000-10, the following described property in the Thomas Peck Survey, Agstract No. 1210 and platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Shady Grove Baptist Church Tarrant County, Texas and addressed as 8241 Precinct Line Road and shown in Exhibit "A"containing 2,777 acres shall be rezoned from U-School, Church and I nstitutional District to C 1-Commercial District and, the following described tract of land in Exhibit "B" and Exhibit and "C" being a tract of land in the Thomas Peck Survey, Agstract No. 1210, containing 7.320 acres in the 8700 Block of Shady Grove Road shall be rezoned from AG-Agricultural to C1-Commercial 2. THA T, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein. 3. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this Ordinance No, 2471 Page 1 of 6 ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 23rd DAY OF MARCH, 2000. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 10th DAY OF APRIL 2000. Mayor Charles Scoma City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Ordinance No, 2471 Page 2 of 6 .- o ... .. !! ~ ~ z .... tn (") ~ Exhibit "A"of Ordinance No. 2471 ,... o ... '" '" n'" ~!:! ~~ ..", ~~ ",II> "'~ ;;;ª :t ~ ~ ...ë! "'''' " 'I ~~õ !! -¡E '" ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~~ N o o n ~,... g¡ ~o!i! ~:ã >' ",iI! 1::2", o~1I> Š"'~ o II> L:J ~ § . '1 ~ :.. £~ ~õ ¡; ,.. ~ ~ ~ Ji:I ~ ~ ~ ~d~ 0.., !iJ ;., ~ ~m ;¡ !~ '" ::t C') ê'S ~ l>ij~ > It n c ~ d~ ... - .~ f"\ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~~ .,,~ z " » .... , C)CC ' ¡; 2 ~ ~ ~ ~~~ !:::V> ë! '" c Q~Cj'j '" "'I C ~~ ~ ~ TO JOSEPH PAUL STILLWELL ANO 'MFE UNOA J. Sl1L WELl. 7508 / 343 NOO'OO·OO·W ~ . " ",-<~~ -..t0lC1(A ">l.. ;::;~~¡::fe ~~ ~V>~Õ " ~~=~m "'''ö o~'" EfY1~ ª~~ ~ TO ~ STEVE R. BISHOP ANO WIFE. BETTY L, BISHOP '\ 7464 / 328 \ .<1 ./ ,., / d .' ., / ~ ~ :!I I; :g -""¡id Îë)~ ¥~ ~~~~ ifj~~ ,. -< I:: " ~ o ~ ;;! '" ~ '5 t::I c:: z .. :J> ~ -g ~ ¡~~I =< ~ªd' f;; n~!i 8 · ~~~I ~ I. 80 ~ ; i3 CJ) -a ? '\ TO \KELL Y P. KEY ANO LEE ROBIN KEY 12511 / 723 s- o Ordinance No, 2471 Page 3 of 6 ,Deslgn\99\99071\Clty\ZonExhìbìt_U,awg Man Feb 14 15: 18: 31 2000 Dunuway Associates, Inc. Exhibit "B"of Ordinance No. 2471 ÀG, -pz ,;;2 OQJ - 0 C;{. Ie..¡- 00 Property Description Being a tract of land situated in the Thomas Peck Survey, Abstract No. 1210, and embracing a portion of a certain track described in the Deed to Steve R. Bishop and wife, Betty L. Bishop, Volume 7464, Page 328 and all of a certain track of land described in the Deed to Kelly P. Key and Lee Robin Key, Volume 12511, Page 723, and all of a certain tract of land described in the Deed to Joseph Paul Stillwell and wife, Linda J. Stillwell, Volume 7508, Page 343 deed records Tarrant County, Texas and being located within the city limits of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas: Beginning at a point at the intersection of the West Right of Way of Precinct Line Road (County Road No. 3029) and the North Line of Shady Grove Road, and the southeast corner of said track described in the Deed to Steve R. Bishop and wife, Betty L. Bishop: Thence North 89°36'40" West, leaving the West right of way line of said Precinct Line Road, with the North right of way line of said Shady Grove Road and the South line of said track described in the Deed to Steve R. Bishop and wife, Betty L. Bishop, 231,52 feet to a found 5/8 inch iron rod; Thence North 89°38'28" West, with said North right of way line of Shady Grove Road, 175,62 feet to a found Ì'2 inch iron rod at the Southwest corner of said Tract described in the Deed to Kelly p, Key and Lee Robin Key, and the southeast corner of said Tract describe in the deed to Joseph Paul Stillwell and wife, Linda J. Stillwell; Thence North 89°45'56" West, with said North right of way line, 215,15 feet to a point, said point being the southwest corner of said Tract described in the Deed to Joseph Paul Stillwell and wife, Linda J, Stillwell, and the southeast corner of a Tract described in the Deed to John W, Barfield, Trustee for BH&L Joint Venture, Volume 7827, Page 588 deed records Tarrant County, Texas; Thence North, leaving said North right of way line, 493,80 feet along the West line of said Tract described in the Deed to Joseph Paul Stillwell and wife, Linda J. Stillwell and the East line of said Tract described in the Deed to John W, Barfield, Trustee for BH&L Joint Venture, to a point, said point being the northwest corner of said Tract described in the Deed to Joseph Paul Stillwell and wife, Linda J, Stillwell and the southwest corner of a Tract described in the Deed to Jean Barfield Properties Family Limited Partnership, Volume 13515, Page 424, deed records Tarrant County, Texas, and on the East line of said Tract described in the Deed to John W, Barfield, Trustee for BH&L Joint Venture; Thence East, leaving the said East line, 215,15 feet, along the North line of said Tract described in the Deed to Joseph Paul Stillwell and wife, Linda J. Stillwell Ordinance No, 2471 Page 4 of 6 Exhibit "B"of .......... Ordinance No. 2471 and the South line of said Track described in the Deed to Jean Barfield Properties Family Limited Partnership, to a point; Thence East, along said North line of the Tract described in the Deed to Joseph Paul Stillwell and wife, Linda J. Stillwell, and the North line of said Tract described in Deed to Kelly P. Key and Lee Robin Key, and the North line of said Tract described in the Deed to Steve R. Bishop and wife, Betty L. Bishop and said South line of said Track described in the Deed to Jean Barfield Properties Family Limited Partnership, 175.69 feet to a point on the West right of way line of said Precinct Line Road; Thence South 00°02'53" East, along said West right of way line, 264,07 feet to a point, said point being the beginning of a curve to the right, having a central angle of 05°53'00", radius of 1975.86 feet and long chord that bears South 02°59'23" East, 202.80 feet; Thence along the arc of said curve to the right, 202.89 feet to a point; Thence South 44°39'03" West, along said West right of way line, 43.72 feet to the place of beginning and containing 318,838 square feet or 7.320 acres of land. _ Jinance No, 2471 Page 5 of 6 vnJinance No, 2471 Page 6 of 6 0. ~ a: w ¡!i ~ 0. ê :J :J ,. 01 ~.'" '-~5~ ~~ ~'" ~...,.;- ~ ~ CD ~ '~r1 --c'7'I"l'JT"-~-;"r~'1"'I-~'1^J11T1r\1\T'J\T['J!)!J' ~J(.J'; ..J - " I!J ... 8:ß"',..,~2 ~uilO~OJN 1"...."'-1"0 LnOt 00 NN 'iii'ì'iifj¡ 0:: -I'" . <] U ..J :.. ./ ; ~ g~£ I ?9tL '1 ÁtiJS 'J~\I\ aNY dOHS/8 O! R , ~ 00 . £~L I IIÇ~I \ f' ~ ~ "'J~ NI8011 J31 aNY "'J~ 'd Am~ " ' :!? ~ O! ~~ - e to ... ,8 ~~ -0 "'''' z ~ ~;" ~.ri ênÑ 00 z ttt I goçL T13'tI 1US 'r 'IONn 3.:1\1\ aNY 113'A1'US 1nVd HdJSQr O! Exhibit "C"of Ordinance No. 2471 t~g I t?lI~ H:JllnH:J !SUdVS 3^OIlO ,l,OVHS O! Ç£I: I teg£ H:JllnH:J !SUdVS 3^OIlO ,l,O'IHS O! . ü ¡:: I-< en C£¡ E-< <I: I-< U o (f) (f) <I: >-- ~ >- ..- <t: Z :::> Q 81 ~ i8 'r - i ~~.. la~~ !i~ii ;II:~ ~-~¡;- ~~ ~ iii 0. ~ ~~ w ~~8 ~ ~ 0: ¡z ~~7 ~ ~ ~ § ",- 1;!~ C,J t; 0- < " ~~~ ~ ! ~ Z 0-0. ~ VI W f'" - ;¡j ~¡ 0- i~~ ~ ~ 8 ~ <.1 J: ~ < "' I!: ~ ~ ~ ~ 15 !J ~ð ~¡:; ~g¡. i g¡ > ~~!S~iš VI., ~~ ~ ~ ¡.; e ¡" i5 ....~ j ~~ "" î 00'" ~.... -..: ... . ~ ~ CD 51 .""" Ji Ii! z ~ ~ i u >- ~ '" ti f: c C N ~ == Ji_ S t.J o~~ æ 0- '" ..;.. "'.. ¡z.... ~ § 0- t.J z en ~ oj ¡¡¡ ð r= ã", <;:; ",'" 1;!w <0 :;;ii! ~~ i!'i~ ",<.1 CD .., 0- 9 VI 0 ~..,~ O-X'" ~~~~ .< -0- Qt;~ g¡-'~ <.1 .. 0- o -' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/10/00 Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Joe Dorris Agenda Number: PZ 2000-12 to Amend the Approved Special Use Permit (Ordinance No. 2254) for a Contractors Office with Garage in a C2 -Commercial Zoning District on a Lot 1 RA, Block 33, College Hills Addition. The property is located at 5949 Davis Boulevard. Ordinance No. 2472 CASE SUMMARY Mr. Joe Dorris submitted a requestto amend the approved Special Use Permit (Ordinance No. 2254 - December 8, 1997) for a contractor's office with a garage in a C2- Commercial District that is located within 200 feet of residentially zoned property. The proposed amendment to the SUP is due to changes to the arrangement of the building and parking lot. The building approved was approximately 12,160 square feet and oriented to face directly east. The proposed building faces the southeast and contains 12,000 square feet. The property is currently undeveloped. The original application to the Planning and Zoning Commission showed the west and north building elevations with a tilt wall with aggregate finish and on the south and east elevation a tilt wall with a broom finish (textured finish). The Commission recommended only the north elevation be of broom finish and all remaining elevations shall be of aggregate finish. The subject property was replatted (PS 96-31) from two lots into one lot and abandoned the right-of-way of Ross Road with the provision of a 25 foot public access easement. t-- Immediately to the west of the subject property is a 30 foot strip of land that is owned by the Post Office and zoned C2- Commercial. As a result the applicant is not required to provide any buffering or screening fences. SURROUNDING FUTURE LAND USES The subject property is designated as Commercial and Low Density Residential. North: South: East: West: Future land Use Low Density Residential & Public/Quasi Public Commercial Low Density Residential Commercial & Public/Quasi Public '-, Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget t r Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ ~ L:\Cases\PZ Cases\2000\PZ 2000-12-41 SUP Joe Dorris.doc Page 1 of 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their public hearing on March 23, 2000, recommended approval of PZ 2000-12, to amend the approved site plan of the Special Use Permit for a contractor's office with a garage within 200 feet of residential property on Lot 1 RA, Block 33, College Hills Addition at 5949 Davis Boulevard by a vote of 5 to 0 with a condition. The condition being that the south, east and north building elevations have an exposed aggregate finish and allow the west elevation to have a broom finish. To approve Ordinance 2472 and PZ 2000-12 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission with the exception that all building elevations have an exposed aggregate finish. ~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM L:\Cases\PZ Cases\2000\PZ 2000-12-41 SUP ",Uti UUIIIIS.UUC Page 2 of 2 "'-0 .~'. ~--'d : ,.' ~ ,...\- R·2- PZ 2000-12 SPECIAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 5949 ROSS ROAD "0"" 7R I /.2 V~ø. 7 C',. /Y",~ 8 0""._ 'C J60 1R8M 11tDG TltDU TRa: TIUC TC 2360 I ¡....-TR.UC : -¡---___.J 11t7!l 1-1 . "t7 ~TR.Œ ~TR.ŒI ~---~----~,-,- ------ 8A Co ~<~ '7·MF ~~ ,---..- d - "" C~"- -;'--/ 8A C'<~ ---JJ R-7-MF 7A 7R!I! 1-1 ~RSÐ TR.19A IJ 22 Pºc~~O NOR -- 2043 TH RICHLA · 0'51 "H' ¡' NO ~LVO. -~ gt·~ 2Jf 2 14 .. ~ ~~g~w~or-:- ~ - ,- D 8... I f----'"' 011: 20 Z, I ;!... I 12 9 U l, ~ '-- '"' -5 28 ~ -- I 27 i 8:e , 'IJ 8 t- - 0 - --1 .. 0 . C\~:@oo: _ ~ , 12 14 13 O,O~ ~~~~," e.'" A2 £, C-2 G~'\ ?-£.\)~1A.<;' 2 PD-b ~ , e 2J " TRJ.(T " J ... 5 5 O·~. 2 ;- - ~~'t:~\). . .oq. '1" " It\- I '9 13 ~~A'S' ?'sL ... 9 D 12 r 1 i Z: -I >-, ...1 or:~ ~ "'- 2J C-2 1413 30 21 :21 ' I I LIMERICK LN I 1 I I I '~ 2 i J ~ ... i 5 ¡ 6 ¡ 1 i a i 9 ,() _ ~:._. --f---+-+---r -'-i-4t-- , , \ I ' I ¡ I, . '" i 9 e 29 28~7'2I512512'12J,22 :21,' 12. ,). ! . I I I ' _ : ..~~ \:'3 DO~EGAl LN · ~~ rM¡ 1\?'1~ L' 15, , I " <H\2 3141515 71118:91'0" 12_ CI I 1 _-- -'- j-- --=-¡=¡-rTT. -r:- f:: ~-ì '" ì A ! I Q "" I """ ],. )7 I ~ :!5 1,.4 13 .;... Z.i :e 11. PZ 2000-12 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF JOE DORRIS TO AMEND THE APPROVED SPECIAL USE PERMIT (ORDINANCE NO. 2254) FOR CONTRACTORS OFFICE WITH GARAGE IN A C2-COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT ON LOT 1 RA, BLOCK 33, COLLEGE HILLS ADDITION AND LOCA TED AT 5949 DAVIS BLVD. APPROVED Mr, Joe Dorris has submitted a request to amend the approved Special Use Permit (Ordinance No. 2254 - December 8, 1997) for a contractor's office with a garage in a C2- Commercial District that is located within 200 feet of residentially zoned property, The applicant is requesting to amend the SUP because of proposed changes to the arrangement of the building and parking lot. The building approved was approximately 12,160 square feet and oriented to face directly east. The proposed building faces the southeast and contains 12,000 square feet. The property is currently undeveloped, The subject property was replatted (PS 96-31) from two lots into one lot and abandoned the right-of-way of Ross Road with the provision of a 25 foot public access easement. Immediately to the west of the subject property is a 30 foot strip of land that is owned by the Post Office and zoned C2- Commercial. As a result the applicant is not required to provide any buffering or screening fences, Staff recommended approval of PZ 2000-12 provided the west and north building elevations have an exposed aggregate finish to match the south and the east elevations, Mr, Davis asked staff what a broom finish is and if it meets the masonry requirements. Ms. Ratcliff, in her opinion, feels that a broom finish is not what the City Council was looking for when the ordinance was written; she doesn't believe it meets the spirit of the ordinance, Vice Chairman Blue opened the public hearing. Mr, Joe Dorris presented this request explaining that a broom finish is merely a texturing of the masonry tilt wall and won't be seen from the street. Seeing no additional proponents and no opponents the hearing was closed, Mr. Davis, seconded by Mr. Nehring, moved to approve PZ 2000-12 provided only the north elevation be of broom finish; all remaining elevations shall be of aggregate finish. The motion carried unanimously. P & Z Minutes March 23, 2000 13 ORDINANCE NO. 2472 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2254 A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE WITH SHOP AND GARAGE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by changing said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, in case number PZ 2000-12, hereby amends the Special Use Permit approved by Ordinance 2254, authorizing for a Contractor's Office with Shop and Garage as shown on the attached site plan known as Exhibit "A" on the property described as follows: Lot 1 RA, Block 33, College Hills Addition (5949 Davis Boulevard) 2. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 3. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this Ordinance, Ordinance No, 2472 Page 1 of 2 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 23th DAY OF MARCH 2000. ;;; #~! ~ ~tl~ Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2000. Mayor City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Ordinance No, 2472 Page 2 of 2 i[D~ "ISJ- _C~~ ~~'Ò. -~~~~~ ~.. lGOJEJFJFLE]R'S EUROPEAN AUTOMOBILES, INC. -Servicing Fine European Automobiles- (817) 514-8000 - Fax (817) 514-9000 5935 Davis Blvd, ichland Hills, TX 76180 Web Page: www.loefflers.rs.net MAR 2 2 2000 Case #: PZ 2000-12 JOE DORRIS As a Property Owner within 200 feet of the subject tract, I PROTEST following comments: and have the 1, Ross Rd. has been abandoned, and is no longer maintained as a public thouroughfare, To allow building on property without public egress and regress would constitute a public safety hazard, and impact unfairly one boundry to my property located at 5935 Davis Blvd, whose Western boundry lies across and immediately on the other side of the abandoned roadway, 2, Surface drainage from the Ross Rd. property drains to our property, since the Ross Rd, property is a higher elevation, Building and changing the land profile, especially with parking paving would upset the current drainage and worsen the problem that already exists, JOSEF LUBCZYK, 5935 Davis Blv / / COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.S. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 817,581, 5515 Property Location: Street Address of Property: Legal Description of Property: Property Owner Information: Name of Property Owner: Application for Site Plan Review Ni~H (Pleas. øri'1t an responses) 5949 Ross Road Lot l-RA, Block 33, College Hill Addition Larry Houk Phone No, 817-577-8180 Address of Property Owner: 5l09A Commercial City: State: Texas Zip: 76180 North Richlan~ H;ll~ Applicant / Authorized Agent Information: "Note: An affidavit signed by the property owner is required when the agent is not the property owner" Name of Applicant / Authorized Agent: Joe Dorris Phone No.817-348-8811 ý( ì--¿w.g--"L.~¿J-'3:3- Address: 1203 Lake St., Suite 211 ------- -- - ----- -~- - - City: Fort Worth State: Texas Zip: 76102 "----- _'''_ _n._____ Type of Site Plan Review: Planned Development X Specific Use Permit '-~R-6-T Townhomes R·7-MF Multi-familly Required Documents: The following table contains a checklist of the minimum items required for Site Plan Review. Spëciãl------·----- ,--- Planned Use Townhomes Multi.family .~evelopme~.-!er~~----------..,----_ 1, Plot Plan showing existing &. planned structures. bldg, lines, boundaries, and easements, R R R R ------.-.---- ·····-·-·__·___..____u.. _.___.___.. _____nu __ _ 2. Topographic information with contours drawn at two foot inteNals, R R ~----- --.---- ---'~---"-' ..-----.....-- -------.------ ....._. -.---.-. .3. Elevation drawings of all buildings indicating the proposed exterior finish materials, R R R R ---....--------.-.-----. ..._,..-.-_... -..-.- - .--,- _.- -.. 4. Landscaping. lighting, lencing, screening, and wall, indicating all heights, R R R R ----_.._------_._----_._.~._. . --.-- -- -- ------- .--.---- -.._---- ----- 5, Location of egress and ingress, R R R R ---.---.-..---.------ -...--.--.--.-- -.. ,..... Õ. OH-street parking and loading facilities. R R .- --.-.---.-.-..----.----------.-- .__..._-..-.-. --.. 7. All pedestrian walks. malls, and open areas. R R ---.-.-- ----. ........ -~-- --- -_. - 8, Proposed land uses indicating areas in square feel. R R ----------.----...--- - ------- 9, Location & types of signs, including lighting and heights with elevation drawings, R R .----.--.--.----...- -.-, 10. Street names on proposed stree!s. R ---------------..-----. 11. Existing &. proposed water. sewer, & drainage systems: grading plan. R 12, Engineering drawings of all public improvements to be dedicated ~~e City._ ____,___ ___ _ (Can be ,su~rn~~e~_at time o~ pla~ing) 13. Utility and drainage easements & location of solid waste .:Jisposal fa~~~:::..__________ R, ~~ ~dditional it::ns as re~uired ~~e City .£~~.::!:__, __ n _.. _ __.__... R Note: 'R' = Required . _ _. u. _____ -....--.- -. R R R R R R R R R R R R R Date: I certify that I am. or represent, the c;'.r.:;r of the propert'j described above and hereby submit this Site Plan to ¡he City of Not7h .elichland Hills lor review and approval, _u~~l~~o~ Your name (Printed Name): Joe Dorris ..--./ -~ ?l ;)e<x) -{;2 l .~.. --.--.---.-.--- -----.-- Site Plan Review Application J CO-419(2-98) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/10/00 Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of ASG Northwood Agenda Number: PZ 2000-13 Plaza, Ltd. for a Zoning Change on Lot 2R, Block 2, Snow Heights North from C1- Commercial to C2-Commercial. This Property is Located at 6805 N.E. Loop 820. Ordinance No. 2469 CASE SUMMARY ASG Northwood Plaza is requesting that Lot 2R, Block 2, Snow Heights North Addition be rezoned from C 1 Commercial to C2 Commercial. The Plaza is located on the north east corner of Loop 820 and Rufe Snow Drive. It is made up of several parcels in blocks 2 and 13 of the Snow Heights North Addition. The parcels nearer to Rufe Snow Drive are zoned C2 while the parcels on the interior, fronting Loop 820, are zoned C1. The subject parcel is a small one-acre lot with several store-fronts that face Loop 820. The request to change zoning is the result of a car rental company wishing to open a satellite office in the plaza. SURROUNDING FUTURE LAND USES The subject property is designated as Commercial. North: South: East: West: Future land Use Commercial Loop 820 Commercial Commercial Current Zoning C-1 Antique Mall Loop 820 C-1 Office Building C-2 Pep Boys RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their public hearing on March 23, 2000, recommended approval of PZ 2000-13 to rezone Lot 2R, Block 2, Snow Heights North from C1-Commercial to C2-Commercial by a vote of 7-0. To approve Ordinance No. 2469 and PZ 2000-13 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available ~~ Finance Director ~~ \\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1 \DA T A\PZ\Cases\PZ Cases\2000\PZ 2000-13-41 Northwood Zoning.doc Page 1 of 1 w > æ: c ;: o z 1-- f/) í--j ~ l 0:::.4 / ~~~ r rlJø r" I I ~ C-1 NORTH EAST LOOP 820 rrz:- C-2 4_____ 2 3 ~~ R2 I ~~~ II-a _ 6 ~ . -~2-- 1 I I 'Iii"€)II!IIÐ!R I- I C-2 I _.------- ---- --- . _ . --. - .. \£. ?? D\J~ þ'\~þ.~ I ! I L____, C-2 ,o\cl\.. J\~ \ , C~2 í i 11<1:. 1 LAK.. DR . 6\ 7R ¿ ) --u~~!>-)~ )~'" ...&J.?':J ...~ '. ... 'tHo ¡au \ III ~ \ Ð -----..-'-------11:. .~ II.... !II - - -,.,- - - .. - - _~ OIl ~ JIIIt 2ft --u;ï - 24 æ~1 ~ E ~ 5A lOR 21 JI '!1 <II 21R --- ---.-- : ~~·~in 3 22 ~~ r: _Zsl_- ~ __~-+-'=- ~!2 n \10 \. IR 2.R 24 _!6_tl JJ~ 131 130 \ ~ \ 28, 21 L~ 25_ I 2 3 \ 4 I 515 \ ;1'8 · 10 n !2: ~ o ~ Þ- '" ... 4 ;:) ... - 22 . 22 JR 22R 2.3 2 2.3 - '" ....,.. 24 111 BiI!JElN'0ISWA1ØRiEiSll . _ C·2 _ 1_ 1360 BUENC 24 32J 2.3 -'---.. \ I ~~1\' I ~ III \ R.I. I ~ 131 II - 8 -- 7 ,- 2 "" R-7-MF Co1€). 1226 4R2 1 BR C-2 C-1 O~,\ÿ.. 1107 5 J. ,\S ~ 'I \\i ;1 G y¡. C-1 ' ,?>9'l.Þ.O 1097 c;~9~ M'E1A1ÐT(!1.WeRlE'So_Ð1- .,. r 7 - -, - ~ ~!2U au ::~; -4- n \4 n \4 · . 12 ~'" 10 1\ ., 1\ 1O!5 C1118~'\J J 0 --- . ,,0 ' 9 . tK 7 i4 ~"' - __,,_ 0 _~_~ ~ 17 ~~- < > f7 · 0 _8 -- 0 8 f7 > 8 ~",- 0 '" , 0 ~ 7 '1 Ð < ---;r" ~ 718 C 7 1! _ w.I ~ 'f> O-!;--- <-E)- > · ill ::E--r t r.a.I .... 17 7 . ~ -, 9 ~ · ~ g-,i-;- ~ ~ ~... ~ 20 >- 5 20 0 ---l,- ~I ,," _ 7 ~ 0 4121 ::E----L 2 i'S ---. PZ 2000-13 REZONING REQUEST 6805 NE LOOP 820 ~ ~ ~".-- ':. -'" 1/ .- L. ~';..(:0>\- ,,,,. - wa....s... ,15\~2 ,1 -R-7oMF , 12 ...... .. _._;- __.] ,.w _._' -- . I 5 J -.... I L : \~sl f.-t-sd l¡æ '" ~'ß'~ 14 . "..' I S~O~ ~I~'\' '__ -1 ~o£.,\y.. 13 '" Y ~S' ?,ctl-a.O 5 ~{~1: ß ~-fo /^ ~2 ~ ,~ II ~O~,\y.. . y..'\S, S~O~ ?,if¡ßJ ~ J: " > x ~ ! 16 0 17 R-7-MF z .;.1 2 ." 2 ~ ~O~"\..¿.. r - - ,. ~ -- - -< ..¿..,,\':>' , S~o~ 12 ~92Þ.o , / , 4 ~92Þ.O C-1 6 -_.-..- ---..--- 14 ø ~~/\.cfJ? yf3 \1>JC_2 1398 ~ <g.\'2.1 " ~ LS 5 u II C-1 1255 21R !. .. I 'JJI I ¡ 2 I I 21R; I ' 141516;':- . , I ' I I ~" .. I TIl2A.B I I ".' . I 12 , ß 23 4 -+-T rd_~L,-- 10 I . . ! 71 5 5 .., . IJ rr J ¡ / 4 _ _. L - ~·1' < n · X ~___ CAROL r- ! ~ ."....._~~------;..",---_._-~-~..'''''.-.."~."'...... 12. PZ 2000-13 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF ASG NORTHWOOD PLAZA, LTD., FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON LOT 2R, BLOCK 2, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDITION FROM C1-COMMERCIAL TO C2- COMMERCIAL. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 6805 NE LOOP 820 APPROVED ASG Northwood Plaza is requesting that Lot 2R, Block 2, Snow Heights North Addition be rezoned from C1 Commercial to C2 Commercial. The Plaza is located on the north east corner of Loop 820 and Rufe Snow Drive, It is made up of several parcels in Blocks 2 and 13 of the Snow Heights North Addition, The parcels nearer to Rufe Snow Drive are zoned C2 while the parcels on the interior, fronting Loop 820, are zoned C1. The subject parcel is a small one-acre lot with several store-fronts that face Loop 820. The request to change zoning is the result of a car rental company wishing to open a satellite office in the plaza, Staff recommended approval of PZ 2000-13, Vice Chairman Blue opened the public hearing and asked the applicant forward, Ms, Marsha Carlton, Property Manager for Northwood Plaza, presented request explaining that she believes existing tenants would benefit from the car rental use, She stated that only 10 cars would be allowed at any given time and they will be parked west of the actual building so not to impede parking for tenants or traffic. Seeing no additional proponents and no opponents, the public hearing was closed. Mr, Davis expressed concern regarding the control the City would actually have should they decide to park 100 cars on site. Ms, Carlton stated that the lease only allows 10 cars at any given time, Mr. Nehring, seconded by Mr. Laubacher, moved to approve PZ 2000-13. The motion carried unanimously. P & Z Minutes March 23, 2000 14 ORDINANCE NO. 2469 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2, SECTION 200, OF ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 10, 2000; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a change in zoning district boundaries; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, in Case Number PZ 2000-13, the following described Lot 2R, Block 2, Snow Heights North Addition, Tarrant County, Texas, is hereby rezoned from C1-Commercial to C2-Commercial. 2. THAT, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein, 3. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. Ordinance No, 2469 Page 1 of 2 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 23rd DAY OF MARCH 2000. .---r-' Ú· I ,~ /91 ) "1."/ ",' . ~/ iy- ,.,1 ./í. 'I' \ ~ /' Ai /I/.#./~! ~ ~ Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission ........ tl ' ;) --"·-··,~·ì ". .o! I j',-,.-<1 A. -'" ;!! i/..... "" Y l .. (,,,'·0V......... ' Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 10th DAY OF APRIL 2000. Mayor Charles Scoma City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED ~ ~ AND LEGALITY: Al10mef!:Jthe City Ordinance No, 2469 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/10/00 Subject: Request of Christopher Jones for a Replat to be known Agenda Number: PS 99-16 as Lots 2R, 3 & 4, Block 1, Davis-North Tarrant County Parkway Addition. The property is located at the southeast intersection of Davis Boulevard and North Tarrant Parkway CASE SUMMARY Request of Christopher M. Jones for a Replat dividing the existing Lot 2 to create Lots 2R, 3, & 4, Block 1, Davis-North Tarrant County Parkway Addition. The property is located at the southeast intersection of Davis Boulevard and North Tarrant Parkway and wraps around the existing Eckerd Drug Store. The existing Lot 2, containing 15.39 acres, would be divided as follows: proposed Lot 2R contains 3.72 acres, Lot 3 contains 6.5 acres, and Lot 4 contains 5.16 acres. Lot 3 would be the site of a future Tom Thumb store while Lots 2R and 4 would be related retail development. The development, to be known as Thornbridge Crossing, received site plan approval from the City Council on January 24,2000. All of the property is zoned C1- Commercial. There are three approaches to this property along Davis Boulevard. The first is an existing approach shared by Lot 1 (Eckerd Drugs) and Lot 2R. The second is approximately 310 feet south of the first approach. The third is approximately 575 feet south of the second approach. There are two approaches on the North Tarrant Parkway side. One is existing and shared with Eckerd. The second is approximately 175 feet east of the first and is limited to truck traffic only. Public Works has reviewed and approved these approaches as has the Commission and City Council with the site plan approval. The applicant, in their memo dated March 13 (attached), has responded to the comments in the Public Works memo dated March 8 (attached). The remaining comments noted by Public Works concern requirements for engineering and construction plans and are not associated with the plat. RECOMMENDA TION: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on March 23, 2000, recommended approval of PS 99-16 a replat to be known as Lots 2R, 3, & 4, Block 1, Davis-North Tarrant County Parkway Addition by a vote of 7 to O. To approve PS 99-16 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Oth r Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ Finance Director L:\Cases\PS Cases\PS 99-16-41-Davis NTP Replat.doc Page 1 of 1 - ._..._._._---~--,-----_.,..~.~....-. I.HCHLJNE_~ SEE,_ªr~d.: ,}~=~§~__p'(1.ge: D f r~lA~ ---S-A s=::)ò ~ r¡ . t~ H -'........,...----.-...-...--.-. í~_1JA2 '7 ' I ! I ti I" .1') : i '" --- '5 iR.10E1 ., II' ... '" '" ." ,... '" 'RACT :A "k.:JAj 2 n '" ~R.\3D PS 99-16 REPLAT LOTS 2R, 3 & 4, BLOCK 1, DAVIS - NORTH TARRANT PARKWAY ADDITION ~.n; Tr.:n,;~ '~.~e ,SHADY GROVE RD-" -'-"'AC7 .1.A C-1 1198 ;.:.,' ~ ;;A" NORTH T AR~f\~T PKWY f NåRTHTARRANTP~ - I .J' 31'3,/ )p' c-, \",\,\\ , \J \J "- \V' ' \,\>', AG C-1 1254 <~I; ~ AG -~----- .- ... :r ... 0 '" R-1 0 z 2059 '" - ----CD Z '" ~ 0 > -0 -< '" n n -; - ... ... :r -; :r o '" z '" AG II' ... ,... ,." -,..,-~ ,-- CO n C1 ... ,." -.---.--- ---.----Ij '" ~--_._--- -~.~._._- ---.-----_.~---- . _I,3N~'], J THROUGH: Ordinance 2360, January ZONING MAP Grid: 90-448 ~ ATCH LINE - SEE Grid: 90-444 TItI Q KNO........e GJT ( ,....--, Page: D3 ) ,;¿;b""C _TH 0 R NM ,EA_O--!O.-W_c..T-"]J, ADOPTED: March 22. 1993 CURRENT · .-_.~---,--~--_.__.~-~._-----_."_._-~-,_..,._., 4. PS 99-16 CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF CHRISTOPHER M. JONES FOR A REPLA T TO BE KNOWN AS LOTS 2R, 3 & 4, BLOCK 1 , DAVIS-NORTH TARRANT ADDITION. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF DAVIS BLVD AND NORTH TARRANT PARKWAY. APPROVED Request of Christopher M, Jones for a Replat dividing the existing Lot 2 to create Lots 2R, 3, & 4, Block 1, Davis-North Tarrant County Parkway Addition, The property is located at the southeast intersection of Davis Boulevard and North Tarrant Parkway and wraps around the existing Eckerd Drug Store. The existing Lot 2, containing 15,39 acres, would be divided as follows: proposed Lot 2R contains 3,72 acres, Lot 3 contains 6.5 acres, and Lot 4 contains 5,16 acres. Lot 3 would be the site of a future Tom Thumb store while Lots 2R and 4 would be related retail development. The development, to be known as Thornbridge Crossing, received site plan approval from the City Council on January 24, 2000, All of the property is zoned C 1-Commercial. There are three approaches to this property along Davis Boulevard, The first is an existing approach shared by Lot 1 (Eckerd Drugs) and Lot 2R. The second is approximately 310 feet south of the first approach, The third is approximately 575 feet south of the second approach, There are two approaches on the North Tarrant Parkway side, One is existing and shared with Eckerd, The second is approximately 175 feet east of the first and is limited to truck traffic only. Public Works has reviewed and approved these approaches as has the Commission and City Council with the site plan approval. The applicant has responded to the comments in the Public Works memo dated March 8. The remaining comments noted by Public Works concern requirements for engineering and construction plans and are not associated with the plat. Mr. Nehring, seconded by Mr. Welch, moved to approve PS 99-16 - subject to engineer's comments. The motion carried unanimously. P & Z Minutes March 23, 2000 4 · ... .-.-:a.--"'.......-.w- -....---. - -._~._....:T~,...--.r-~~-----"-> . ~_.a"""""·-~-~n-·-\:".---uD'SU'~L CDIS'- ~002 Pacheco Koch ' ' March 13, 2000 PK No.: 1884-99.053 Ms. Julia Skare, P .E. Engineering Department CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 ~ Re: DAVIS-N. TARRANT ADDITION, Block 1, Lots 2R, 3 & 4 North Tarrant Parkway @ Davis North Rich/and Hills, T eXBS Dear Ms. Skare: This letter is to notify you that the enclosed Construction Plans have been revised in accordance with your March 8. 2000 Review Memo. The following items have been addressed as per the referenced memo: Driveway Spacing: 1, The 45-foot approach with 5-foot wide median will be provided. 2. In accordance with the site plan approval, the eastern aprproach will be limited to truck traffic only. Site Plan: 1, The revised site plan has been approved by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. Drainage Easements: 1. The drainage easements have been changed to provide a minimum 7.5 feet on each side of the storm mains and a minimum 5 feet from the outside of the storm structures, 2, The referenced curve radius has been revised to be greater than 30 times the diameter. Easement curves CV-1 and CV-2 have been changed accordingly, Drainage and Utility Easement: 1, The drainage and utility easement in the southeast comer of the property will be dedicated to the City by this plat. The reference to Cabinet and Slide will be removed, l...u I ... _ \. I ~ r-, , - ~ _ "__~_M.-_.___....,~___-~'1"--:L:.i. . "".... ..",-,,¡:...~- ....-..r-...... "---¡'-vo'""-'~""- 'a.."u::;..u i\U\,;lI-\;;OIJSUTr'Efiir ~003 Ms. Julia Skare March 13, 2000 Page 2 TxDOT Permit: 1. We understand that a TXDoT permit will be required for work within TXDoT right-of-way prior to beginning work. Signatures: 1, A filed and signed plat will be included with the final approved plan set. The appropriate signatures to the owner's acknowledgement and dedication will be added to the final plat. A Mylar in addition to the surveyor's seal and signature will be added to the tinal drawings, Street Lighting: 1. We understand the street lighting, per Section 1-06 of the design manual, will be required as part of the development of the subject tracts. Details: 1. Public Works Department details will be added to the proposed construction plans, The individual details will contain only the City of North Richland Hills' logo. Impact/Inspection Fees: 1, We understand that impact fees will be assessed to the development at the time of construction. 2, We understand that inspection fees will be due for the project prior to starting the construction, If you have any questions or need any additional information, please don't hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, CMJ/cmj 1884-134 cc: Marcy Ratcliff - North Richland Hills 80b Katzen - Centrecorp NI~H Public Works / Administration CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS March 8, 2000 MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E., Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS99-16; DAVIS-N, TARRANT ADDITION; Block 1, Lots 2R, 3 & 4; Final (Replat) Plat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on February 15, 1999, The following items are for your consideration, 1, DRIVEWAY SPACING The applicant has proposed two (2) 45-foot driveway approaches along Davis Boulevard. The first approach is approximately 310 feet south of the existing approach on the Lot 1 (Eckerd lot) and Lot 2R property line, The second approach is approximately 575 feet south of the first approach, Public Works is not opposed to the location of these approaches, although a 5-foot median is required in the center of the 45-foot approach as shown on the plans or the width revised to meet the criteria as required in the Design Manual. The applicant has shown one additional approach on N, Tarrant Parkway. This approach is approximately 175 feet east of the existing joint approach, This eastern approach shall be limited to truck traffic only. The parking lot and access drives shall be designed such that customer access and parking will be limited to the existing approach. 2. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS All storm drain improvements shall be placed in a drainage easement. A minimum of 7,5 feet of drainage easement is required on each side of the storm drain main. A minimum of 5 feet of drainage easement is required from the outside of all structures such as curb inlets and headwalls, The minimum curve radii is 30 times the pipe diameter. The pipe curve and therefor the easement curve for CV-1 and CV-2 need to be revised. The plat shows "surface" drainage easement on Lot 1, The Final plat of Lot 1 indicates drainage easement. This needs to be revised. 3, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT The drainage and utility easement in the southeast corner of the property has not previously been dedicated to the City, The referenced Cabinet and Slide is for a private General Warranty Deed, This easement should be dedicated to the City with this plat. Remove the reference to the Cabinet and Slide. PO, Box 820609" North Richland Hills, Texas" 76182·0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820" 817-427-6400" FAX 817-427-6404 PS99-16; Davis-N, Tarrélnt Addition, Block 1, Lots 2R, 3 & 4, r-inal (replat) Plat March 8,2000 Page 2 of 3 4, DRAINAGE A portion of the storm drain improvements are to be constructed by the adjacent property owner. The plans submitted by Long and Associates for this project are in for review, The preconstruction conference will have to be held to construct these improvements prior to start of construction on the remaining improvements on Lots 2R-4. 5, UTILITY EASEMENTS The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 7,5 foot Utility Easement on both sides of all water and sanitary sewer mains, All water meters, fire hydrants and detector check vaults are to be located in a waterline or utility easement. It appears this has been accomplished at this time, 6, TXDOT PERMIT The Plat is bordered by Davis Boulevard, a State Highway, A TxDOT Access Permit will be required, The TxDOT permit application must be submitted to Public Works for approval prior to submitting to TxDOT. Five sets of applications and approved plans are required to be submitted, 7, SIGNATURES The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication on the Final Plat. In addition, the surveyor's seal and signature needs to be added to the mylar of the Final Plat. 8, SIDEWALKS Subdivision Regulations require sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. Proposed sidewalks have been shown on the plans submitted, 9. STREET LIGHTING Street Lighting is required by Section 1-06 of the Design Manual. The locations of any existing streetlights need to be shown on tht:'! topographical drawing to confirm compliance with current ordinances, Any additional streetlights that may be required based on current ordinances, needs to be coordinated with Public Works and TU Electric. The developer will pay the cost for installation of any additional streetlights directly to TU Electric. 10. DETAILS The appropriate details for services will need to be included in the construction plans. Note that the details included in the Design Manual do not contain any logos other than that of the City of North Richland Hills, It is therefore required details be used in their entirety. 11. INSPECTION FEES Inspection fees will be due prior to starting construction, The current rate is four (4%) percent for water and sewer and three (3%) percent for drainage. PS99-16; Davis-N. Tarrant Addition, Block 1, Lots 2R, 3 & 4, F-inal (replat) Plat March 8, 2000 Page 3 of 3 There are several comments regarding the engineering and construction plans. These comments are recorded on a set of blueline construction plans and a separate letter to the Engineer, The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. QL~<~hbÅf _ 'JW Itcd/pwm200 -043 cc: Gregory W, Dickens, p, E., Public Works Director Kevin B. Miller, P,E., Assistant Public Works Director NI~H APPLICATION FOR A REPLAT City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Rlchland Hills. Texas 817-581-5500 (Please print or type all responses) 'osed Subdivision Name: D~v \ 'S - )..JO ~T'A Cu~ntLegaIDescripüon: LoT" è... J ~\o c.\I:: \ TÅ~À}.)í (JA'i-~~,( \oc.. " D~0.~ -J.Jo~~ ï:;l~, Â{)()Tioµ \ ~""~\..Ù ^ ~ A~ì t"~ 0 µ Name and Address of Current Prof!.erty Owner: CE-~"'\'îZ.€: ~::\=> ~ D \oJ ~6Lot' ~,.:), ~~1 "\~OVT~ ~AR...~ :I:töJ\J.,)(Ø l &'f.).'S 75()(ó \ (-r~~ ') Co~. Phone No. q 1 è. 7~o -3<=t~~ ~ ørr '\2e.)..\. ~~ìÃ\E:: g Name and Address of Previous Owner:(if purchased during last twelve months) Ò ~'K JJ\C ~\ - LA}.) t:) \~ ~E: J L. Ç1 ~ 57QO \tJ. .ç>~..A.,Jo PAR.Kw-'.", J SV\\E. \'2...óoo Û,ð..LLÅ~ T6~)'S 75~~ Name and Address of Developer: ( \ C~~'F~ .,)() ~C;;"E:-Lo~M~)J, ':\f1..ASoj CO~? 3~ S. PL'1' }-\ovT8 ?~~" :ì'"\è..vìD T 7 0' \ Name and Addres of Engineer: CWZ~.~lO.p~€ ~ M... -rcN:~ ~. £, . -PÄC..\\ECO ~oc..\It C a>':¡~~ï: "'c. ~~Ei:-SL S ~"tt)\ '-ß:.~ ~~~, S..,iit ~O~ "\A.\..L.A ':> I GfA ~ 7'5 2.. ~ ~ . Trd of Development Being Proposed: D SF Residential D Duplex Residential µ Phone No. ~7z.. 7;'0· ~99G, Phone No, 972. "Z. ~ ~ - ~o ~ \ D MF Residential D Other ~ Commercial/Industrial Application Fee: 1, Application Fee 2, Number of residential lots @ $1.50 per lot: 3, Number of non-residential lots @ S5,OO per acre 4. Number of street interseclJon signs @ $65.00 each 5. County plat filing fee: I~O.óO eo·cc - TOTAL FEE Z.OO. 00 I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the property described above and do hereby submit this Replat to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration, (Attach affidavit with all property owner's names when more than one owner involved.) Date: MJ...'-t ~. . I~~\ Applicant's Phone No.: 91'- 2.~'j - 1o~ \ ).A.. ~)')e-5 Signature: Ca~ Number " .(, Taxes Paid Uens Paid Assessments Paid REPLAT CD ~ 403 (2196) .-- A',,'iIf.~<,,\"; ""',-", "'.-------'_.~. CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Department Council Meeting Date: 04/10/99 Subject: Request of Jim Makens for a Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Agenda Number: PS 2000-04 Gibson Addition. This Property is Located at the Northeast Intersection of Precinct Line Road and is Addressed as 8616 Davis Boulevard. CASE SUMMARY Jim Makens is proposing to final plat one lot, containing 1.25 acres. The parcel is zoned "C-1" Commercial and has a Special Use Permit (SUP- PZ 99-33) for a convenience store that was approved by City Council on January 10, 2000. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Precinct Line Road and Davis Boulevard. The applicant has made the necessary revisions to the plat per the Public Works memo dated February 17, 2000. RECOMMENDA TION: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on February 24, 2000, recommend approval of PS 2000-04 by a vote of 7 to 0, provided the GPS Coordinates are corrected and the offsite easement is reviewed and filed and the schedule for the offsite sewer is submitted. The corrections to the GPS Coordinates have been made, the offsite easement has been filed and the schedule for the offsite sewer has been submitted. To approve PS 2000-04 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev,) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available f:1Ù Finance Director ~(~ ead Signature L:\Cases\PS Cases\2000 Plats\PS 2000-04-42 GIBSON FINAL PLAT.doc Page 1 of 1 6. PS 2000-04 REQUEST OF JIM MAKENS FOR A FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GIBSON ADDITION. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD AND DAVIS BLVD AND IS ADDRESSED AS 8616 DAVIS BLVD. APPROVED '--~ Jim Makens is proposing to final plat one lot, containing 1.25 acres. The parcel is zoned "C-1" Commercial and has a Special Use Permit (SUP- PZ 99-33) for a convenience store that was approved by City Council on January 10, 2000, The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Precinct Line Road and Davis Boulevard, The applicant has made the necessary revisions to the plat per the Public Works memo dated February 17, 2000, Outstanding issues include: 1, The GPS coordinates need to be corrected before the plat is considered by City Council. 2, The offsite easements need to be reviewed and filed and the schedule for the offsite sewer (by others) needs to be submitted before this plat is considered by City Council. Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1 Gibson Addition and that before consideration by City Council the GPS coordinates are corrected and the offsite easement is reviewed and filed and the schedule for the offsite sewer (by others) is submitted, Mr. Blue, seconded by Mr. Davis, moved to approve PS 2000-04 subject to engineer's comments. The motion carried unanimously. P & Z Minutes February 24, 2000 5 -~-' _1 --- --1 I I -- -- ------ -- -. .1 L_ _ t- ..,....:. -. ':'\'\1."~' \.," --.- rN.Jnllt fN11.% PS 2000-04 FINAL PLAT GIBSON ADDITION I I ~I~ -J mOt", . "I T"-I<'II ... .-.~....- ~ .-...--.....~.. ,"";! I '-_-1--_______ '\ I\'\\" ""III', ! iA i ,;. ~:.; I II RA LS EDGE 0 Il I I I I i '. ;--- ! 1- .. - -I-. ~'.,- : I. "'\1\,\" 1---1- z ,,\\:_\:. _, _ -'- .' (\:' " I'., Zl-~~\\) \ N,'.,. ! - - - ~'J 0 ~ [\Ù"ù . .- :; ---t~~\\- '1'- Co Z!1 \u... ') --·1- - OJ! -'---- 1 . ~., I" '" -, . ! R-2 1_ 16'73- I .'J I J --- - .-.- - Iff'. AG œ " 0- - -.- -.-'--- ----_. .... '" o o ..1- "" "" >- -.. o " < II'A( f ;' ~ I., I.) ~ \t\\J " - , , ~ . ---- 'Utili C-l 2ï"í 6 Ë,\, ,,'I. I.', I.J " ''''1) ~ ,1l~ ,,2 ~.'.'" . r~'.671__ -: : :~;;' ¡ 1;4 'I - I Z '~O\ '" .. ,~ J"¡ -< :.:u :C:'" ~\(;J > : ,\.,\\1\\ o :~t.f" ,1. .. ·..·tl<.iI1.... '·""AG 'HUt '. ·'R.......__.._. ---.--- Ie IAI AG rH.,,! ..~ -'" , -~ ~i (d ~! -:z: c..~ .. '"'i c.~ c:õ ¿ o I.J :I"" '-tlol' 'A AG ~ I.J I'~ If AG ~ - 1/1 C-1 1675 C·l1 1254 fR.W "'14....\ ';"j,...: [ 0"- N o <"'" I:r~l I AG¡ ¿ u.. 'I~ r ~' SHADY GR.Q..V ."'q , !1.' ~! .. .......:1 ;.4 "......1...1 :......., '...., "", .<1.'1." l'7"\ / NORTH TARRANT PKWY ,,^" I ·,HI . . C-l 1254 C-l 12S.. "\_,,Ü I , \\ : .. 'X"(~ ¡:\\\~'..;:\ :;~\'l::' . \'- i ,\',\\\ . , . . C-1 1427 \ \ 'f("" " ;! ::¡ ¡:: ,,, " - '" - C ;0 ~ ,~ ---- ... - .at . ma-. 'oj (\,\ ,I. y. \ ,\.\(,l,'. , I I. I. \' \ ' i'II . ~ J, \~\\4 \.\~ " :,\ \, W MURPHY ~O " q I, III!' , ",\ " '.;, '"~I"~ '\ ,.J Mc..OONWflL ~CHO()L 1(,\ ,", I: 'I MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Hugh E. Peiser, Peiser Surveying Co, SUBJECT: PS 2000-04; GIBSON ADDITION; Block 1, Lot 1; Final Plat 1. SIGNATURES: The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication (have been addressed), 2, GPS: The GPS coordinates are incorrect, The coordinates need to be corrected before this plat is considered by City Council (will be addressed before City Council Meeting), 3, EASEMENT EXHIBITS: The offsite easement exhibits were submitted on February 16, 2000 have not been reviewed at the time of this letter. The easements have not been filed, The off site easements need to be reviewed, filed and the schedule for the off site sewer (by others) needs to be submitted before this plat is considered by City Council (will be addressed before Council), 4, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS: This site drains to the Northeast. The adjacent property owner Preliminary Platted as lot 2) has agreed in writing to accept the additional runoff Whenever lot 2 is platted, the Owner of lot 2 will need to obtain permission ITom the adjacent landowners and possibly the adjacent communities before additional discharge can be made (will be addressed by Jim Makens at a later day), 5, NPDES PERMIT: Current regulations are changing. This property mayor may not require a TPDES permit. If a permit is required, it is the Owner and the Contractor's responsibility to obtain the necessary permit, The Owner shall therefore request information ITom the TNRCC to determine the necessary steps for filing an application (will be addressed by D & G Speciliaties or Owners), /-I~ t~ NI~H Public Works / Administration CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS February 17, 2000 MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Kevin B, Miller, Assistant Public Works Director/Utilities SUBJECT: PS 2000-04; GIBSON ADDITION; Block 1, Lot 1; Final Plat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on February 17, 2000, The following items are for your consideration, 1, SIGNATURES: The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication. 2, GPS: The GPS coordinates are incorrect. The coordinates need to be corrected before this plat is considered by City Council. 3, EASEMENT EXHIBITS: The offsite easement exhibits were submitted on February 16, 2000 have not been reviewed at the time of this letter, The easements have not been filed, The offsite easements need to be reviewed, filed and the schedule for the offsite sewer (by others) needs to be submitted before this plat is considered by City Council. 4, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS: This site drains to the northeast. The adjacent property owner (Preliminary Platted as lot 2) has agreed in writing to accept the additional runoff. Whenever lot 2 is platted, the Owner of lot 2 will need to obtain permission from the adjacent landowners and possibly the adjacent communities before additional discharge can be made, 5, NPDES PERMIT: Current regulations are changing, This property mayor may not require a TPDES permit. If a permit is required, it is the Owner and the Contractor's responsibility to obtain the necessary permit. The Owner should therefor request information from the TNRCC to determine the necessary steps for filing an application, Kevin B, Miller, P. E. Assistant Public Works Director pwm2000-031 cc: Greg W, Dickens, P,E., Public Works Director Marcy Ratcliff, Director of Planning P,O, Box 820609 * North Richland Hills, Texas * 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 * 817-427-6400 * FAX 817-427-6404 0'<1-:' 20vD -é>~ City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills. TX 76180 817·581·5515 Application Type: -0 Preliminary Plat Application for Subdivision Plat Approval NRH (Pltll' pIÍ1t II rtsøonsll) 18JFinal Plat o Replat o Short Form DAmended Plat Property Owner Information: Name of Property Owner: prad 5(]( ¡bller i- -::Ii tñ c::1#O/l}/è},ttel br. :# í6 3tJtdh/al~ IX 7609ø2.. J?/? ~ 19 /90.:§ a/J;~()íl fJdc/; hon M 0.. ken Phone No. z,z.zo P¡¡"¡OtJrf ,cr":.J. 13nl.ftJrd. ,-ry Á' /1- 5~o- 3229 Štate: Zip: Address of Property Owner: City: Proposed Subdivision Name: No. of Acres in Plat: No. of lots in Plat: ;¿. Authorized Agent Information: "Note: An affidavit signed by the property owner is required when the agent is not the property owner. Name of Authorized Agent: ?fJ / (J'ÞSéY; z l./Ljo m /èhtle/ 7) r. 8t7t/-fA / aJ¿ Phone No. R/1- .3?tJ-tï302_ Address: #/ City: State: 7,J( Zip: 7609¿ Surveyor / Engineer Information: (J/(/e.n '"D. . Name of Firm: J_IJI}J_n Ey . r. -~ - :~j cj- rBsæ.Ú fops .7ñ~~ne No. Address: /6/5" h-e (! I/; C!- f )",/ /¡e!.< 'K¿{' J-Iur~-¡- SJ/1-c2J?/- 2 /;Y fc»f ::1'1] l - \-t9 3~ City: State: ')c Zip: Contact Person: Mark L0!7j Plat Fee Calculation: All Preliminary Plats a, Application Fee: b, $1.50 perresidentiallot or $5,00 per commercial acre: Total Fee: $120,00 All Replats, Short Form Plats, and Final Plats a. Application Fee: $120.00 b. $1.50 perresidentiallot or $5.00 per commercial acre: c. $65,00 for each street intersection: d. County plat filing fee: (8.15 AfI Amended Plsts a. .¿pplication Fee: b. County plat filing fee: Total Fee: (none) $58.00 . $58,00 <" \ \1 f'l.l~ ~...;¡ ¡", .,'" ~ ~"FìméWãivéfReqU'est: (~ptional) ~ '~ de arÁ1nt ~ a Hfrettm8cticti on this plat may not take place for more than thirty (30) days and waives all time requirements for approval of the plat, "~A ,\! Signature: I certlfŸ ~Hª"J¡ 9µsprÐsent, the owner of the property described above and hereby submit this subdivision plat to the City of North Richland Hills for consideration, 0"' 1-2/-aJ /Î Y,""'m,(p~"dN""'1 -//ttrf/ 1(. thbSM Slg>a",,):i/¥ç~ Totaf Fee: $58.00 . 1tlq~.75 . Additionaf filing fees may be applicable for oversize or extra documents. Subdivision Plat Application 4 CD-418(1-98) :,'" ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS \...- Department: Public Works Department Council Meeting Date: 4/10/2000 Subject: Interlocal Agreement with the Regional Transportation Agenda Number: GN 2000-38 Council of NCTCOG for Development and Operation of Commuter Rail Service - Resolution No. - 2000-10 This same interlocal agreement is being presented for approval to all the Mid-Cities which are affected by extension of the Trinity Railway Express through the Mid-Cities to Fort Worth. This includes Arlington, Bedford, Colleyville, Euless, Grand Prairie, Grapevine, Haltom City, Hurst, as well as North Richland Hills. This agreement has been reviewed and discussed previously by these cities and North Richland Hills at the Regional Transportation Council Meeting last September. All cities were in favor of the agreement, but some had comments. Most comments have been addressed in this final draft. There are two versions of the agreement attached. Both are exactly the same except for the cost participation approach. Aareement Oction #1 has previsions for the cost to be allocated by percentage of total ridership from each city based on an annual audit. Aareement Oction #2 is based on the cost to each city being fixed for the four year period at the level shown in Attachment #1, which is $55,000 to the City of North Richland Hills (this is 1.1 % of the total $775,000 to be paid by the Mid-Cities group). The main items covered in the cost sharing agreement other than the cost allocation are listed below. 1. ."-- 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. North Richland Hills will participate in ongoing operation and maintenance costs of the Trinity Railway Express. Payment will start when the rail service is completed to the Fort Worth Ninth Street Station (estimated to be in October 2001). A preliminary feasibility study will be conducted and a report produced on the use of the Union Pacific Corridor for future commuter rail service. Effective date is when executed by both parties. Ending date for agreement is September 30, 2004 and may be renewed. The agreement may be terminated at anytime if both parties agree. The City Attorney has reviewed the agreement and has no objection to the wording for either Agreement Option #1 or #2. Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 2000-10, Agreement Option #2. Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaDle ~- Finance Director Page 1 of RESOLUTION NO. 2000-10 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The City Manager be, and is hereby authorized to execute the attached Interlocal Agreement Option #2 with the Regional Transportation Council of the North Central Texas Council of Governments for development and operation of commuter rail service along the Trinity Railway Express Corridor as an act and deed of the City. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 10th day of April, 2000. APPROVED: Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY OF N$RTH RICHLAND HILLS Legal Office MEMORANDUM To: City Manager From: City Attorney Subject: Draft of Interlocal Agreement - Trinity Railway Express Date: February 4, 2000 Ref: CMM#00-006 The policies for the proposed commuter service will be under the control of the Board of Directors of Dart and the Executive Committee of the T. In reading the agreement, we may lose sight of that. The Council needs to know that it is committed until September, 2004. There is no unilateral right to cancel or withdraw. I find no objection to the wording of the agreement. R x McEntire P.O. Box 820609 * North Richland Hills, Texas * 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 *817-581-5501 * FAX 817-581-5516 North Central Texas Council Of TO: Members of the Regional Transportation Council Trinity Railway Express Monitoring Subcommittee Selected City Managers FROM: Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation SUBJECT: Transmittal of Interlocal Agreement for Cost Sharing in the Trinity Railway Express Corridor Included in this transmittal is the cost sharing agreement, outlining a process for participation by the interested local governments in the operating costs needed for the extension of the Trinity Railway Express service through the Mid-Cities area to Fort Worth, All of the comments and concerns that were raised at the September 1999 meeting of the Regional Transportation Council Trinity Railway Express Monitoring Subcommittee were considered as the revised draft agreement was prepared. On those issues where there were differing opinions, the agreement was drafted to reflect the majority view, In summary, the agreement is a four-year "plus" agreement, beginning in 2000 and continuing until September 30, 2004, Contributions will not begin until the service begins operation to at least the Ninth Street Station in Fort Worth, anticipated for October 2001. The amount to be contributed from the nine participating local govemments would be fixed at $775,000 annually. Each local government's share would be based on an annual audit of the ridership, These audits would be funded by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG), and the first one would be conducted approximately six months after the service begins. The Regional Transportation Council, with recommendation from the subcommittee, will appoint one representative from the Trinity Railway Express Monitoring Subcommittee to serve on the Trinity Railway Express Advisory Committee, At this time, we would ask that you consider this document the final version and begin to discuss it with your attorneys and councils. We would like to have all agreements signed by each city by the end of March. If you have any questions or concems about this agreement, please do not hesitate to call me at (817) 695-.29'40, q'Þ- Thank you for your dedication to regional transportation, ~~.~ JD:lr Enclosure cc: Roger Snoble, DART John Bartosiewicz, FVVf A Mike Eastland, NCTCOG Julie K. p, Dunbar, P,E. 61 Ô SIX Flags Drive. Centerpoint Two p, O. Sox 5888, Arlington. Texas 76005-5888 (817) 640-3300 FAX: 81ï-640-7806 <:> recycled paper http://www.nctcog.dst.tx.us North Central Texas Council Of TO: Members of the Regional Transportation Council Trinity Railway Express Monitoring Subcommittee Selected City Managers FROM: Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation SUBJECT: Development of Second Option to the Interlocal Agreement for Cost Sharing in the Trinity Railway Express Corridor Included in this transmittal is a second option regarding the cost sharing agreement that was originally mailed to you in January 2000. The initial version proposed an audit cost allocation approach, This second option would fix the local government shares, Due to recent discussions with some city managers, I suggest you select either option. The changes for the second option read as follows: Section 6.4 The city allocation of costs will be based on the allocation shown in Attachment 1 and will remain fixed during the contract period, Section 6.6 NCTCOG will fund and conduct an audit of the boardings and alighting of the service, to be used for planning purposes and later contract negotiations (post FY 2004). Section 6.7 The parties agree that the City of will contribute its share of the costs, as outlined in Attachment 1, for FY 2002, FY 2003, and FY 2004. Section 6.8 The City of will make a 50 percent payment at the six-month mark of the appropriate fiscal year with a final payment due at the end of the fiscal year. Each city is being given the option to select either the agreement that was mailed in January 2000 or the new agreement that is enclosed. Please discuss this latest option with your city managers, attorneys, and councils. Due to tillS change, we have extended the period that we would like all agreements signed to the end of April. If you have any questions or concerns about this timeframe or anything related to the agreement changes, please do not hesitate to call me at (817) 695-9240. dµ.jil. ~ Michael Morris, P,E. Ir Enclosure cc: Lonnie Blaydes, DART John Bartosoweicz, FWT A 616 Six Flags Drive, Centerpolnt Two P. O. Box 5888. Arlington, Texas 76005-5888 (817) 640-3300 FAX: 817-640-7806 6) recycled paper http://www.nctcog.d8t.tx.us AGREEMENT OPTION #1 AUDIT COST ALLOCATION APPROACH INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Between THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL and THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS for DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE WHEREAS, the North Central Texas Council of Governments and the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) have actively worked to implement commuter rail service in the area and facilitate the contribution by cities that are not members of a Transit Authority to the operational costs of commuter rail services; and, WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Council Trinity Railway Express (TRE) Monitoring Subcommittee was appointed by the RTC to meet on an as-needed basis to monitor policy issues related to the TRE service and the collection of operating funds for the service; and, WHEREAS, it would be beneficial to the citizens of the City of North Richland Hills to have access to commuter rail service connecting the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth with each other and with Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport to relieve traffic congestion, provide transportation opportunities, and aid in attaining federal air quality standards; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code, Dallas Area Rapid Transit (hereinafter referred to as "DART') and the Fort Worth Transportation Authority (hereinafter referred to as "the T"), both metropolitan transportation authorities created and existing pursuant to Article 1118y, Texas Revised Civil Statutes (hereinafter referred to jointly as the "Transit Authorities"), may exercise jointly the power to provide governmental services for the public health, safety, and welfare; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 1182k, Texas Revised Civil Statutes, all railroad-related activities by public agencies, separately or jointly exercised, are public and governmental functions for the public purpose and necessity; and, WHEREAS, the Transit Authorities have entered into an Interlocal Cooperative Agreement to define their respective rights and responsibilities regarding the provision of commuter rail service along the Trinity Railway Express Corridor and have begun commuter rail service as the Trinity Railway Express; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties agree as follows: Article 1. DEFINITIONS: 1.1 "Commuter rail service" means operating passenger trains for commuters by, or under the control of, the Transit Authorities. 1.2 "Capital improvement" means any addition to the asset base of either Transit Authority (1) for the sole benefit of and utilization by the commuter rail service, or (2) representing the proportionate share of joint facilities benefiting, or utilized on behalf of, Commuter Rail Service. 1.3 "Maintenance of way" means the labor, material, tools, and equipment required to maintain all aspects of the railroad tracks, structures, signals, and communications. 1.4 "Boards" means the Board of Directors of DART and the Executive Committee of the T. 1.5 "Best efforts" means one party's use of all reasonable exertions to fulfill the obligations of that party under this Agreement. It does not mean an obligation to attempt to fulfill the obligations of any other party. 1.6 "Capital costs" means the costs to plan, engineer, design, purchase, and construct the facilities, equipment, and systems for the commuter rail service that may be depreciated in accordance with standards set by the Federal Accounting Standards Board, Article 2. ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS: 2.1, North Central Texas Council of Governments and ReQional Transportation Council: The North Central Texas Council of Governments (hereinafter referred to as "NCTCOG") is the metropolitan planning organization for the North Central Texas region including Dallas, Fort Worth, and the City of North Richland Hills. The North Central Texas Council of Governments is authorized by law to conduct coordinating and technical studies as may be required to guide the unified development of the area, eliminate duplication, and promote economy and efficiency through areawide planning. The Regional Transportation Council, comprised primarily of local elected officials, is the regional transportation policy body associated with the North Central Texas Council of Governments, and has been and continues to be a forum for cooperative decisions on transportation and is charged with the responsibility of preparing and maintaining the metropolitan transportation plan and transportation improvement program for the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area in accordance with applicable federal regulations. 2 2.2. Trinitv Railwav Express Monitorina Subcommittee: The Trinity Railway Express Monitoring Subcommittee (TREMS) was created by the RTC to monitor and advise on the provision of commuter rail services by TRE between the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth. 2.3 Trinitv Railwav Express Advisory Committee: DART and the T have created the Trinity Railway Express Advisory Committee (TREAC) to assist the Boards on policy, budget issues, and service levels for TRE. A representative from the TREMS shall be appointed by the RTC to the TRE Advisory Committee. A representative from the Trinity Railway Express Monitoring Subcommittee shall be nominated by the subcommittee and appointed by the Regional Transportation Council to the Trinity Railway Express Advisory Committee. 2.4 Companion Aoreements: The RTC will enter into companion agreements with the cities identified in Attachment 1. The RTC will also enter into a companion agreement with the Fort Worth Transportation Authority and the Dallas Area Rapid Transit to disburse the funds collected by the RTC from the cities listed in Attachment 1, including the City of North Richland Hills. Article 3. POLICY: 3,1 Trinitv Railwav Express Advisory Committee: Policies, service levels, fares, and budgets are presented and reviewed by the TREAC prior to final approval by the Boards. Notice of all TREAC meetings and agendas and copies of supporting agenda materials shall be provided to the cities listed in Attachment 1. 3,2 Boards: All policies for the commuter rail service shall be adopted by the Boards of the Transit Authorities, and those contracts reserved by statute for award by the Boards remain with the Boards, These include, but are not limited to, budget approval, service levels, service extensions, procurement, and fares. The budget for the service and spending authorizations will be as provided annually by the Boards, 3 ~ - ..- ----,- .._-----,~.~~.~-'---"'"-"-'---~-._"-"----'--- Article 4. CAPITAL COSTS: 4,1. Capital Costs of Fixed Facilities and Eauipment: The Transit Authorities shall separately contribute the capital for, and own the capital improvements, including all equipment, stations, rail cars, and locomotives. 4,2 The Trinity Railway Express Monitoring Subcommittee may review and comment upon the planning and design of all line improvements to and on the TRE Corridor. 4.3 If the City of North Richland Hills or TREMS requests additional improvements not accepted by the Transit Authorities, the City of North Richland Hills or TREMS may individually fund such improvements. Article 5. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE: 5.1. Service Schedules: Service levels shall be determined by the Transit Authorities. Pursuant to this Agreement, service on Monday through Friday shall be at least four trains eastbound and four trains westbound in both the AM and PM peak ridership periods, 5.2. Service Quality: The Transit Authorities shall develop and establish the procedures to implement and ensure that the highest possible quality of service, consistent with the budget, is provided. 5,3. The City of North Rich land Hills or TREMS may suggest or request changes or additions to the service schedules at any time, but such is especially encouraged during the formation of the annual TRE budget. Any suggested or recommended service not adopted by the Transit Authorities may be separately funded by TREMC, provided equipment, facilities, and crews are available, Article 6. COST SHARING FOR CONTINUING OPERATIONS: 6,1. General: The parties recognize that the commuter rail service contemplated under this Agreement will create ongoing costs for operation of the service and maintenance of the assets used in its provision, as well as other recurring expenses. Such costs include the Director of Trinity Railway Express, Commuter Rail Service Operator, maintenance of way costs and capital assessments, dispatching costs, insurance, security on trains, administrative costs, and revenue collection. 4 6.2. There will be no operating funds collected from the City of North Richland Hills until the TRE extension to Fort Worth's Ninth Street Station in Downtown Fort Worth is operational, anticipated to take place October 2001 (FY 2002), 6.3 Starting in the first fiscal year of operation and continuing for the duration of this Agreement, the cities participating in this cost sharing process agree to pay a fixed amount of $775,000 annually to provide the operating funds outlined above, 6.4. The initial city allocation of costs will be based on the allocation shown in Attachment 1 and will be revised solely from an independent audit of transit riders. 6.5. The funds in the first fiscal year of operation will be prorated based on the opening day of service. 6.6 NCTCOG will fund and conduct an annual audit of the boardings and alightings of the service, to be used to adjust the city allocation for that year and to use the audit as a starting allocation for the next fiscal year. It is anticipated that the audit would occur six months after the opening service to the Ninth Street Station, 6.7 The parties agree that the City of North Richland Hills will contribute its share of the costs, as outlined in Attachment 1, for FY 2002, and as revised from the aforeoutlined annual audit, for FY 2003 and 2004. 6.8 The City of North Richland Hills will make a 50 percent payment at the six- month mark of the appropriate fiscal year with a final payment due following the audit at the end of the fiscal year, Article 7. FURTHER STUDY: 7.1 A feasibility study for double tracking the TRE service between Dallas and Fort Worth will be completed as soon as possible. Frequent off-peak service and service extensions into the Dorothy Spur and Burlington Northern corridors are contingent upon this capacity, 7,2 A preliminary feasibility report of the use of the Union Pacific Corridor as defined in the Mobility 2025 Plan will be completed by the end of FY 2002. If feasible, service would be implemented as soon as possible after that date, 7.3 A feasibility study of the development of commuter rail service along the Dorothy Spur will be completed by the end of FY 2003. 5 Article 8. TERM AND TERMINATION: 8,1 Effective Date: The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date on which it is executed by the parties. 8.2 Term: This Agreement shall be in effect until September 30, 2004, and may be renewed by written agreement of the parties. 8.3 Mutual Termination: The parties may terminate this Agreement by mutual agreement at any time. 8.4 New Transit Authority: In the event any city identified on Attachment 1 joins an existing transit authority or becomes or forms a new transit authority with a dedicated source of funding for transit, the obligations under this Agreement for that city shall cease on the day the funding begins and be transferred to the new transit funding source. The $775,000 fixed amount shall be reduced by the amount shown on Attachment 1 for the withdrawing city. Article 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS: 9,1, Force Majeure: It is expressly understood and agreed by the parties to this Agreement that, if the performance of any provision of this Agreement is delayed by reason of war, civil commotion, act of God, govemmental restrictions, regulations or interferences, fire or other casualty, court injunction, or any circumstances which are reasonably beyond the control of the party obligated or permitted under the terms of this Agreement to do or perform the same, regardless of whether any such circumstance is similar to any of those enumerated herein, the party so obligated or permitted shall be excused from doing or performing the same during such period of delay, so that the period of time applicable to such requirement shall be extended for a period of time equal to the period of time such party was delayed, 9,2. Contractual Relationship: It is specifically understood and agreed that the relationship described in this Agreement between the parties is contractual in nature and is not to be construed to create a partnership or joint venture or agency relationship between the parties, Nor shall any party be liable for any debts incurred by the other party in the conduct of such other party's business or functions. 6 9,3. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts. Each such counterpart shall be deemed an original of this Agreement, so that in making proof of this Agreement, it shall only be necessary to produce or account for one such counterpart. 9.4, Complete Aareement: This Agreement embodies all of the agreements of the parties relating to its subject matter, supersedes all prior understandings and agreements regarding such subject matter, and may be amended, modified, or supplemented only by an instrument or instruments in writing executed by all of the parties. 9.5. Captions: The captions, headings, and arrangements used in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not in any way affect, limit, amplify, or modify its terms and provisions. 9.6. Governina Law and Venue: This Agreement and all agreements entered into in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are, and will be, executed and delivered, and are intended to be performed in the County of Dallas and the County of Tarrant, State of Texas, and the laws of Texas shall govern the validity, construction, enforcement, and interpretation of this Agreement. In the event of litigation between the parties hereto, their successors or assigns, with regard to this Agreement and any subsequent supplementary agreements or amendments, venue shall lie exclusively in either Tarrant County or Dallas County, Texas, 9,7. Severabilitv: In the event anyone or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall be for any reason held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision(s) hereof, and this Agreement shall be revised so as to cure such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision(s) to carry out as near as possible the original intent of the parties, 9,8, Chanqed Circumstances: If future federal, state, or local statute, ordinance, regulation, rule, or action render this Agreement, in whole or in part, illegal, invalid, unenforceable, or impractical, the parties agree to delete and/or to modify such portions of the Agreement as are necessary to render it valid, enforceable, and/or practical. Each section, paragraph, or provision of this Agreement shall be considered severable, and if, for any reason, any section, paragraph, or provision herein is 7 - -.. .. ---,..~..,,"-,~..~-<>.._>"._..._---~~-"...... ... .._--...-~--.....-,."._--,~.__.._.."_~-~--~-_'_-'~ determined to be invalid under current or future law, regulation, or rule, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of or otherwise affect the valid portions of this instrument. 9.9. Enforcement: If any party initiates an action to enforce any provision of this Agreement or for damages by reason of an alleged breach of any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the other parties all reasonable and necessary costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with such action. 9.10. Survival: All of the terms, conditions, warranties, and representations contained in this Agreement shall survive, in accordance with their terms, and shall survive the execution hereof, 9,11, Incorporation of Exhibits and Schedules: All Exhibits and Schedules attached hereto are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein. 9,12. Reference: The use of the words "hereof." "herein." "hereunder," and words of similar import shall refer to this entire Agreement, and not to any particular section, subsection, clause, or paragraph of this Agreement, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, 9.13, Further Assurances: Each party agrees to perform any further acts and to sign and deliver any further documents which may be reasonably necessary to carry out the provision of this Agreement. . 9,14, Notice: Whenever this Agreement requires or permits any consent, approval, notice, request, proposal, or demand from one party to another, the consent, approval, notice, request, proposal, or demand must be in writing to be effective and shall be delivered to the party intended to receive it at the address(es) shown below: If to TREMS: Trinity Railway Express Monitoring Subcommittee Regional Transportation Council c/o North Central Texas Council of Governments Attn: Michael Morris. P.E. Post Office Box 5888 Ar1ington. Texas 76005-5888 8 ,_._.....~..,.....~~~._--"._~._y---~..~._"~."'...,.._-- . .~~.~._"--_._,~---""-,~.."'-_._._~-'-~- ,. If to the City of North Richland Hills: IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in duplicate original at Arlington, Tarrant County, Texas, the day of ,2000. CITY ATTEST: Mayor NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Executive Director Attorney 9 - .._~~~---~._...__."..~._......~-~~~~.~~._".__..__.-'-- ,_.,.. ,. _'_'_'_--~'_'_"""~--'--'~~~"~-'" :I: ..1-- mo:: mo ~~ D..t- ><0:: wo >-LL «0 ~I-- ::!e> «Z 0::- >-~ 1--- -:I: ~I-- O:::J 1--0 m t: o ~ CO () o - < ..., U) o o C) t: ~ co '- (1) Q. o U) (1) .- ..., .- o I "'C .- ~ ..., U) o o ~ ...,co U)..., ot: O~ '- (1) a.. ~ o 000000000 000000000 000000000 öañañööañÖañlÕ VQ)NNCON..,-VIO ..,- ..,- ..,- ..,- 4ß- ......c~~~~~~~~ c~c c c c c c c c COQ)It)VNIONQ)..,- ........ . N..,-ONMOON..,- U) - - .- (1) :J: (1) .£: (1) ~ t: "'C - .- t: .- -g o '- == U) f! .- 0 ..., co ~o>U)a..>EU)- -, 'to- ~ (1) (1) ~ .r:. .= "'C ~ ~"'C Q. 0 ::J () -(1)-wt:co""Xæ <£118 f!t5ñi C) x € o z ATTACHMENT 1 o o o IÒ t- t- 4ß- _"...e.__·__"_____···__····__+__,,··_··e_..··_...·_..··.",~~-~~.--,", AGREEMENT OPTION #2 FIXED COST ALLOCATION APPROACH INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Between THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL and THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS for DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE WHEREAS, the North Central Texas Council of Governments and the Regional Transportation Council (RTC) have actively worked to implement commuter rail service in the area and facilitate the contribution by cities that are not members of a Transit Authority to the operational costs of commuter rail services; and, WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Council Trinity Railway Express (TRE) Monitoring Subcommittee was appointed by the RTC to meet on an as-needed basis to monitor policy issues related to the TRE service and the collection of operating funds for the service; and, WHEREAS, it would be beneficial to the citizens of the City of North Rlchland Hills to have access to commuter rail service connecting the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth with each other and with Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport to relieve traffic congestion, provide transportation opportunities, and aid in attaining federal air quality standards; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code, Dallas Area Rapid Transit (hereinafter referred to as "DART") a!1d the Fort Worth Transportation Authority (hereinafter referred to as "the T"), both metropolitan transportation authorities created and existing pursuant to Article 1118y, Texas Revised Civil Statutes (hereinafter referred to jointly as the "Transit Authorities"), may exercise jointly the power to provide governmental services for the public health, safety, and welfare; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 1182k, Texas Revised Civil Statutes, all railroad-related activities by public agencies, separately or jointly exercised, are public and governmental functions for the public purpose and necessity; and, WHEREAS, the Transit Authorities have entered into an Interlocal Cooperative Agreement to define their respective rights and responsibilities regarding the provision of commuter rail service along the Trinity Railway Express Corridor and have begun commuter rail service as the Trinity Railway Express; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties agree as follows: Article 1. DEFINITIONS: 1,1 "Commuter rail service" means operating passenger trains for commuters by, or under the control of, the Transit Authorities, 1,2 "Capital improvement" means any addition to the asset base of either Transit Authority (1) for the sole benefit of and utilization by the commuter rail service, or (2) representing the proportionate share of joint facilities benefiting, or utilized on behalf of, Commuter Rail Service. 1,3 "Maintenance of way" means the labor, material, tools, and equipment required to maintain all aspects of the railroad tracks, structures, signals, and communications. 1.4 "Boards" means the Board of Directors of DART and the Executive Committee of the 1. 1,5 "Best efforts" means one party's use of all reasonable exertions to fulfill the obligations of that party under this Agreement. It does not mean an obligation to attempt to fulfill the obligations of any other party, 1,6 "Capital costs" means the costs to plan, engineer, design, purchase, and construct the facilities, equipment, and systems for the commuter rail service that may be depreciated in accordance with standards set by the Federal Accounting Standards Board, Article 2. ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS: 2,1. North Central Texas Council of Governments and Reqional Transportation Council: The North Central Texas Council of Governments (hereinafter referred to as "NCTCOG") is the metropolitan planning organization for the North Central Texas region including Dallas, Fort Worth, and the City of North Richland Hills, The North Central Texas Council of Governments is authorized by law to conduct coordinating and technical studies as may be required to guide the unified development of the area, eliminate duplication, and promote economy and efficiency through areawide planning, The Regional Transportation Council, comprised primarily of local elected officials, is the regional transportation policy body associated with the North Central Texas Council of Governments, and has been and continues to be a forum for cooperative decisions on transportation and is charged with the responsibility of preparing and maintaining the metropolitan transportation plan and transportation improvement program for the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area in accordance with applicable federal regulations, 2 ---.,.,,---..-.-----. . ..._"'~._---._"-.---_.~~~,....,<-"-- 2.2 Trinity Railway Express Monitorino Subcommittee: The Trinity Railway Express Monitoring Subcommittee (TREMS) was created by the RTC to monitor and advise on the provision of commuter rail services by TRE between the Cities of Dallas and Fort Worth, 2,3 Trinity Railway Express Advisory Committee: DART and the T have created the Trinity Railway Express Advisory Committee (TREAC) to assist the Boards on policy, budget issues, and service levels for TRE. A representative from the TREMS shall be appointed by the RTC to the TRE Advisory Committee. A representative from the Trinity Railway Express Monitoring Subcommittee shall be nominated by the subcommittee and appointed by the Regional Transportation Council to the Trinity Railway Express Advisory Committee. 2.4 Companion Aoreements: The RTC will enter into companion agreements with the cities identified in Attachment 1, The RTC will also enter into a companion agreement with the Fort Worth Transportation Authority and the Dallas Area Rapid Transit to disburse the funds collected by the RTC from the cities listed in Attachment 1, including the City of North Richland Hills. Article 3. POLICY: 3.1 Trinity Railway Express Advisory Committee: Policies, service levels, fares, and budgets are presented and reviewed by the TREAC prior to final approval by the Boards. Notice of all TREAC meetings and agendas and copies of supporting agenda materials shall be provided to the cities listed in Attachment 1. 3,2 Boards: All policies for the commuter rail service shall be adopted by the Boards of the Transit Authorities, and those contracts reserved by statute for award by the Boards remain with the Boards. These include, but are not limited to, budget approval, service levels, service extensions, procurement, and fares, The budget for the service and spending authorizations will be as provided annually by the Boards. 3 Article 4. CAPITAL COSTS: 4,1 Capital Costs of Fixed Facilities and Equipment: The Transit Authorities shall separately contribute the capital for, and own the capital improvements, including all equipment, stations, rail cars, and locomotives, 4,2 The Trinity Railway Express Monitoring Subcommittee may review and comment upon the planning and design of all line improvements to and on the TRE Corridor, 4,3 If the City of North Richland Hills or TREMS requests additional improvements not accepted by the Transit Authorities, the City of North Richland Hills or TREMS may individually fund such improvements, Article 5. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE: 5,1 Service Schedules: Service levels shall be determined by the Transit Authorities. Pursuant to this Agreement, service on Monday through Friday shall be at least four trains eastbound and four trains westbound in both the AM and PM peak ridership periods, 5,2 Service Qualitv: The Transit Authorities shall develop and establish the procedures to implement and ensure that the highest possible quality of service, consistent with the budget, is provided. 5,3 The City of North Richland Hills or TREMS may suggest or request changes or additions to the service schedules at any time, but such is especially encouraged during the formation of the annual TRE budget. Any suggested or recommended service not adopted by the Transit Authorities may be separately funded by TREMC, provided equipment, facilities, and crews are available, Article 6. COST SHARING FOR CONTINUING OPERATIONS: 6.1 General: The parties recognize that the commuter rail service contemplated under this Agreement will create ongoing costs for operation of the service and maintenance of the assets used in its provision, as well as other recurring expenses, Such costs include the Director of Trinity Railway Express. Commuter Rail Service Operator, maintenance of way costs and capital assessments, dispatching costs, insurance, security on trains, administrative costs, and revenue collection, 4 6,2 There will be no operating funds collected from the City of North Richland Hills until the TRE extension to Fort Worth's Ninth Street Station in Downtown Fort Worth is operational, anticipated to take place October 2001 (FY 2002), 6,3 Starting in the first fiscal year of operation and continuing for the duration of this Agreement, the cities participating in this cost sharing process agree to pay a fixed amount of $775,000 annually to provide the operating funds outlined above, 6.4 The city allocation of costs will be based on the allocation shown in Attachment 1 and will remain fixed during the contract period, 6.5 The funds in the first fiscal year of operation will be prorated based on the opening day of service. 6,6 NCTCOG will fund and conduct an audit of the boardings and alightings of the service, to be used for planning purposes and later contract negotiations (post FY 2004), 6.7 The parties agree that the City of North Richland Hills will contribute its share of the costs, as outlined in Attachment 1, for FY 2002, FY 2003, and FY 2004 6,8 The City of North Richland Hills will make a 50 percent payment at the six- month mark of the appropriate fiscal year with a final payment due at the end of the fiscal year. Article 7. FURTHER STUDY: 7,1 A feasibility study for double tracking the TRE service between Dallas and Fort Worth will be completed as soon as possible, Frequent off-peak service and service extensions into the Dorothy Spur and Burlington Northern corridors are contingent upon this capacity. 7,2 A preliminary feasibility report of the use of the Union Pacific Corridor as defined in the Mobility 2025 Plan will be completed by the end of FY 2002. If feasible, service would be implemented as soon as possible after that date, 7,3 A feasibility study of the development of commuter rail service along the Dorothy Spur will be completed by the end of FY 2003, 5 Article 8. TERM AND TERMINATION: 8.1 Effective Date: The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date on which it is executed by the parties, 8,2 Term: This Agreement shall be in effect until September 30, 2004, and may be renewed by written agreement of the parties, 8,3 Mutual Termination: The parties may terminate this Agreement by mutual agreement at any time, 8.4 New Transit Authoritv: In the event any city identified on Attachment 1 joins an existing transit authority or becomes or forms a new transit authority with a dedicated source of funding for transit, the obligations under this Agreement for that city shall cease on the day the funding begins and be transferred to the new transit funding source, The $775,000 fixed amount shall be reduced by the amount shown on Attachment 1 for the withdrawing city. Article 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS: 9.1 Force Majeure: It is expressly understood and agreed by the parties to this Agreement that, if the performance of any provision of this Agreement is delayed by reason of war, civil commotion, act of God, governmental restrictions, regulations or interferences, fire or other casualty, court injunction, or any circumstances which are reasonably beyond the control of the party obligated or permitted under the terms of this Agreement to do or perform the same, regardless of whether any such circumstance is similar to any of those enumerated herein, the party so obligated or permitted shall be excused from doing or performing the same during such period of delay, so that the period of time applicable to such requirement shall be extended for a period of time equal to the period of time such party was delayed, 9.2 Contractual Relationship: It is specifically understood and agreed that the relationship described in this Agreement between the parties is contractual in nature and is not to be construed to create a partnership or joint venture or agency relationship between the parties. Nor shall any party be liable for any debts incurred by the other party in the conduct of such other party's business or functions 6 ._"_..~^-,.._-"_.~----.-..-..~._..",_._._..,,..~-""-~-~-~~,-~~~._--~--_..~.....,,-,_.,._,-_.._._._..~._~ 9.3 Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, Each such counterpart shall be deemed an original of this Agreement, so that in making proof of this Agreement, it shall only be necessary to produce or account for one such counterpart, 9.4 Complete Aoreement: This Agreement embodies all of the agreements of the parties relating to its subject matter, supersedes all prior understandings and agreements regarding such subject matter, and may be amended, modified, or supplemented only by an instrument or instruments in writing executed by all of the parties, 9.5 Captions: The captions, headings, and arrangements used in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not in any way affect, limit, amplify, or modify its terms and provisions. 9,6 Governino Law and Venue: This Agreement and all agreements entered into in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are, and will be, executed and delivered, and are intended to be performed in the County of Dallas and the County of Tarrant, State of Texas, and the laws of Texas shall govern the validity, construction, enforcement, and interpretation of this Agreement. In the event of litigation between the parties hereto, their successors or assigns, with regard to this Agreement and any subsequent supplementary agreements or amendments, venue shall lie exclusively in either Tarrant County or Dallas County, Texas. 9.7 Severability: In the event anyone or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall be for any reason held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision(s) hereof, and this Agreement shall be revised so as to cure such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision(s) to carry out as near as possible the original intent of the parties, 9.8 ChanQed Circumstances: If future federal, state, or local statute, ordinance, regulation, rule, or action render this Agreement, in whole or in part, illegal, invalid, unenforceable, or impractical, the parties agree to delete and/or to modify such portions of the Agreement as are necessary to render it valid, enforceable, and/or practical. Each section, paragraph, or provision of this Agreement shall be considered severable, and if, for any reason, any section, paragraph, or provision herein is 7 determined to be invalid under current or future law, regulation, or rule, such invalidity shall not impair the operation of or otherwise affect the valid portions of this instrument. 9.9 Enforcement If any party initiates an action to enforce any provision of this Agreement or for damages by reason of an alleged breach of any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the other parties all reasonable and necessary costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with such action. 9.10 Survival: All of the terms, conditions, warranties, and representations contained in this Agreement shall survive, in accordance with their terms. and shall survive the execution hereof. 9,11 Incorporation of Exhibits and Schedules: All Exhibits and Schedules attached hereto are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof for all purposes as if fully set forth herein, 9,12 Reference: The use of the words "hereof," "herein," "hereunder," and words of similar import shall refer to this entire Agreement, and not to any particular section, subsection, clause, or paragraph of this Agreement, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. 9,13 Further Assurances: Each party agrees to perform any further acts and to sign and deliver any further documents which may be reasonably necessary to carry out the provision of this Agreement. 9.14 Notice: Whenever this Agreement requires or permits any consent, approval, notice, request, proposal, or demand from one party to another, the consent, approval, notice, request, proposal, or demand must be in writing to be effective and shall be delivered to the party intended to receive it at the address(es) shown below: If to TREMS: Trinity Railway Express Monitoring Subcommittee Regional Transportation Council c/o North Central Texas Council of Governments Attn: Michael Morris, P,E. Post Office Box 5888 Arlington, Texas 76005-5888 8 If to the City of North Richland Hills: IN WITNESS HEREOF I the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in duplicate original at Arlington, Tarrant County, Texas, the day of ,2000, CITY ATTEST: Mayor NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney Executive Director 9 -,_.,_.._"_."",~..,-~._~........--~----_."¥.._._-._,,,.,-,,._-'-'-'.~"-""--'.'~- :I: ..1-- en a::: eno c: ~~ 0 ;; ns Q.I-- 0 0 ><a::: - - « wo ..- f/) >-U- 0 u «0 t:n ~I-- c: :¡:¡ :::!e> ns '- (1) «z 0- a:::- 0 > f/) (1) >-a::: :¡:¡ 1-- u -J: I "C ~I-- .- ~ a:::::> 1--0 en A TT ACHMENT 1 000000000 0 ..- 000000000 0 f/) 000000000 0 - 0 ~ ~ - ~ - - - - - Ln OLnLnOOLnOLnLn U vcnNN<DN~vLn ...... ~ ~~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ----~ I (1) C) ..-ns ~~~~~~~~~ f/)"- o c: o 0 0 0 0 0 000 CX)cnLnvNLnNcn~ U~ ........ . '- N~ONMOON~ (1) a- f/) I - - .- I (1) :r: (1) .¡: (1) ~ "C j c: "C - .- c: .- o '- = f/) ns ._ U ....., c: ~ ..- 0 > f/) '- > f/) ns ....., C) '+- ~ (1) a- (1) E '- ~ .- () .~ "C ~ :; "C Q. 0 :J 0 - (1) - W c: ns ....., :r: .- <mo ns'-(ij n: () '- (!) :r: .c (!) t 0 z I ~ '~ INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No.IR 2000-046 ~ Date: T Subject: April 1 0, 2000 Citizens Request to Review the Portable Sign Ordinance Please find attached a letter from Mary Sands, Port-A-Sign. She is requesting City Council to review and consider amending the Sign Regulations adopted on November 22, 2000 relative to portable signs. We have informed Mrs. Sands that the portable sign provisions have been in effect a relatively short time and we anticipate Council want s to continue as they are for a longer period in order to get a better evaluation of the new request. Mrs. Sands requested an item on the agenda, and Staff informed her she could present her request during the citizens appearances part of the Council agenda. We anticipate Mrs. Sands will appear to present her position to the Council and request changes in the portable sign portion of the ordinance. iS~ Planning Director \\NRH_CITY _HALL2\VOL 1\DATA\PZ\Cases\Staff Reports\IR 2000-046 Citz Req Rev Portable Signs.doc Page 1 of 1 ~I. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PORT - A - Sill P. 0, BOX 820751 NORTII RlCHLAND HILLS, TX 76182..Q75 1 7625 DEAVER DRIVE NORTII RlCHLAND HnLS, TX 76180-6277 Phone 817/428-8262 & 817/335-5500 & 817/239-9560 March 16,2000 MAR 11 2000 MARCY RATCLIFF PLANNING & ZONING CITY OF NORm: RICHLAND HILLS 7301 N,E,LooP 820 NORm: RICHLAND HILLS,TX 76180 REQUEST REVIEW OF PORT ABLE SIGN ORDINANCE TIllS LETTER IS REPRESENTING OWNERS OF BUSINESSES HERE IN NORm: RICHLAND HILLS, THEY NEED THE PORTABLE SIGNS AT LEAST (30) DAYS AND FOUR SIGNS PER YEAR FOR SEASONAL PROMOTIONS. BECAUSE OF BIG STORE COMPETmONS. FOR HIRING HELP, REST AURANTS. DAY CARES, OTHER BUSINESSES. FOR SPECIAL EVENTS, SCHOOLS, CHURCHES, POLITICAL, SPORTS, THESE SMALL BUSINESSES DESERVE AFFORDABLE ADVERTISING. THE (30) DAYS AND (4) TIMES PER YEAR . ARE THE ONLY CHANGES WE ARE REQUESTING, THANK YOU. MARY SANDS LOCAL BUSINESS OWNER