HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 2000-06-26 Agendas
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 26, 2000 - 6:15 PM
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall - Pre-Council Chambers 7301
Northeast Loop 820.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION
TAKEN
Prior to the City Council Meeting, Council members will meet and participate in the Trinity
Railway Express "Whistle-Stop Tour"
Texas & Pacific Station, 1600 Throckmorton, Fort Worth, TX
4:30 p.m.
1. Discuss Items from Regular June 26, 2000 City Council
Meetinq (5 Minutes)
2. I R 2000-085 Sidewalk Policy
3. *Executive Session - The Council may enter into closed
Executive Session to discuss the following:
Consultation with Attorney as Authorized by Government
Code §551.071 -
Deshong vs. New Braunfels General Store
International, Inc. and the Citv of North Richland Hills
4. Adjournment - 6:50 om
*Closed due to subject matter as provide by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated,
it will be taken in open session
POSTED
j l.vV\c à~; J óô Ú
Dat~
9"1Ö UV)
Time
6/26/00
City Council Agenda
Page 1 of 3
By
óA5l~ettî;cJ,~
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 26, 2000 - 7:00 PM
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers 7301 Northeast
Loop 820, at 7:00 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or
action.
1. Items on the consent agenda will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for
separate discussion.
2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items
listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open
Meetings Act.
3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should
contact the City Secretary's office at 427-6060 two working days prior to the meeting so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
1. Call to Order
2. Invocation - House of Grace
Les Grounds, Minister of Pastoral Care
3. Pledqe of Alleqiance
4. Special Presentations
Yard of the Month
5. Removal of Item( s) from the Consent Agenda
6/26/00
City Council Agenda
Page 2 of 3
6. a. Minutes of the Pre-Council Meeting
June 12, 2000
b. Minutes of the City Council Meeting
June 12, 2000
GN 2000-062 c. Approve Resolution No. 2000-037
Repealing Resolution No. 99-10
PW 2000-019 d. Approve City-Developer Agreement for
CIP Sewer System Improvements with
TMC Management Company - Sanitary
Sewer Main BB1.1 - Resolution No.
2000-043
Resolution of Support for Ten-Year
7. GN 2000-063 Continuation of the Crime Control and
Prevention District -Resolution No. 2000-045
Consideration of Amending Council Rules of
8. G N 2000-064 Procedures - Resolution No. 2000-047
Approve Sidewalk Policy - Ordinance
9. GN 2000-065 No. 2484
Appeal Public Hearing to Consider the
10. PZ 2000-022 Request of McDonald Associates on behalf of
This public Nextel for a Special Use Permit to Allow a 120
hearing not to foot Monopole Communications Tower with an
be heard prior Equipment Shelter Building on Property Zoned
to 7:30 p.m. 1-2 Medium Industrial District. The Property is
Located on Lot 3R, Block 7, Industrial Park
Addition and Addressed as 5649 Rufe Snow
Drive - Ordinance No. 2486
Public Hearing to Consider the Request of
11 . PZ 2000-025 Shady Grove Baptist Church (Vernon and
This public Evelyn Jackson), represented by Innovative
hearing not to Construction, for a Zoning Change), from AG
be heard prior Agricultural to R2 Single Family Residential at
to 7:30 p.m. 6649 Precinct Line Road (being Tract 3C1 and
3C2 out of the Tandy K. Martin Survey,
Abstract 1055 - Ordinance No. 2487
12. a) Citizens Presentation
b) Information and Reoorts
)
I
13. Adjournment \1LII\oØ d~ ~ ððO
Date
~', 1 Ó 6.V)
Time
6/26/00
City Council Agenda
Page 3 of 3
By
c::Jar!1. . J
~- ~ iAJ., ~
NI~H
Office of the City Secretary
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
June 23, 2000
PUBLIC NOTICE
The North Richland Hills Public Facility Naming Ad Hoc Committee will meet on
Monday, June 26,2000 immediately following the 7:00 p.m. City Council
Meeting. The Ad Hoc committee meeting will be held in the Administration
Conference Room, North Richland Hills City Hall, 7301 Northeast Loop 820,
North Richland Hills, Texas.
Agenda:
· Review and Discuss Policies Regarding the Naming of Streets, Parks, Public
Buildings and other Public Facilities.
aMvtitd ~
City Secretary
POSTED
(þ"~3·00
Date
/:q~ ~'~
¡me
City Secretary
~_'_'H'
P.O. Box 820609 * North Richland I-HIIs, Texas * 76182-0609
7301 Northeast Loop 820 * 817-427-6060 * FAX 817-427-6016
\ ~',
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. IR 00-085
~ Date:
T Subject:
June 26, 2000
\
Sidewalk Policy
The City has never had a standard written Sidewalk Policy in the past for construction of
new sidewalks in the areas currently without sidewalks. This ordinance addresses this
situation as well as clearly stating the City's policy on new developing areas and
redeveloping areas.
The Policy's major requirements are listed below. The most recent changes are
highlighted in bold face print.
1. Requires sidewalks to be 5 feet wide if adjacent to the back of curb.
2. Defines "redeveloping areas" which will need sidewalks.
a. Building permit equal to or greater than 50-percent of the fair market value of
the existing improvements and there exists sidewalks along the rest of the
block face, or the property frontage is 300 feet or more, or it extends for 50-
percent or more of the block face.
b. Those areas designated or targeted by the City Council for
redevelopment.
c. The property owner shall pay for the sidewalks in the areas outlined in
Item 2.a. The City will have the option to pay for a portion or all of the
cost for sidewalks in all other redeveloping areas.
3. Reiterates Ordinance No. 1895 dated June 28, 1993 that the adjacent property
owner is responsible for replacement or repair of existing faulty sidewalks.
4. Allows for property owners to request new sidewalks in areas without sidewalks.
Requires 80-percent of the property owners to sign the petition. The cost is the
property owner's responsibility to pay the City prior to co~struction.
5. Provides for the City to construct and pay 100% for new sidewalks in areas
without sidewalks if the location rates a "priority warrant". Provides a chart to
determine if a "priority warrant" exists.
6. Restates the City's right to assess for new sidewalk improvements with City
street improvement projects.
7.
Provides for City to pay for sidewalks on Community Development Block
Grant projects when sidewalks are required.
I
\18.
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
Outlines methods for repayment of assessments.
NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS
'--
This policy was patterned after the City of Fort Worth's policy with several modifications.
The "Priority Warranting System" chart, Attachment "A", was also a part of the City of
Fort Worth's policy.
Recently, a petition for a sidewalk on Susan Lee Lane between Lola and Noreast was
received. The petition had the property owners which had 80 percent of the frontage in
favor of the request for sidewalks. Using this situation as an example, we reviewed it to
see if it ranked a priority warrant per the chart in Attachment "A". Attachment "B" shows
that it does.
The Public Works Department requests a Sidewalk Construction Fund be set up with a
$50,000 budget initially. This will allow staff to construct the sidewalks which meet the
priority warrant requirements as petitions are submitted. Each year the Council can
adjust the amount to be budgeted in the Sidewalk Construction Fund based on the past
year's use of the fund, the projects warranted that are waiting for funding, and the
remaining balance in the fund.
Staff welcomes any comments or suggestions.
Respectfully submitted,
.'-.......
'--
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
Sidewalk Policy
ORDINANCE NO. 2484
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills finds a need for
more pedestrian walkways in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills wants to
encourage the construction and reconstruction of sidewalks in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is willing to participate in the cost of sidewalk
construction when deemed appropriate.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of North Richland Hills,
Texas, that:
I. PURPOSE
It is the intent of this policy to encourage the construction and/or reconstruction of
sidewalks throughout the City for the safety and convenience of pedestrians.
II. DESIGN STANDARDS
The design and construction of sidewalks shall conform to City standards and
shall provide, at a minimum, a four-foot wide concrete sidewalk located
approximately 5-1/2 feet behind the back-of-curb, or a five-foot wide concrete
walkway located immediately behind the back-of-curb. The specific design and
placement of the sidewalk may vary depending upon location and extenuating
circumstances, however, the Public Works Department shall approve the final
design. In all cases, the placement of the sidewalk shall provide a continuous
walkway for the pedestrian and will be compatible with other existing sidewalks in
the neighborhood. Curb ramps will be required at the corners of all intersections
as sidewalks are constructed.
III. SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS
A. New Develooinq Areas
1. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all new streets.
2. In developing areas, sidewalks should normally be installed along
with the construction of homes, offices, buildings, etc. so as to
avoid being damaged by heavy trucks during that stage of
development. The City Building Official will require that sidewalks
that were required at the time of platting be installed during the
construction of buildings on the lot(s) and prior to the issuance of
the Certificate of Occupancy and/or final connection of utilities.
Page 1 of 5
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
Sidewalk Policy
3. The cost of required sidewalks in new developing areas shall be
paid by the builder and/or property owner.
B. Redevelopinq Areas (developments beinq expanded or reconstructed)
1. Sidewalks shall be required in redeveloping areas under the same
conditions as new developing areas. An area shall be considered
to be redeveloping for purposes of this policy when:
a.flj A building permit is issued in an amount equal to or greater
than 50-percent of the fair market value of the existing
improvements (as determined by the City Building Official);
and
illJ There are sidewalks existing along the rest of the block face;
or the property on which the building permit is issued has a
frontage of 300-feet or more, or extends for 50-percent or
more of the block face~; or
b. The property is located in a residential area identified and
tarqeted by the City Council for redevelooment.
2. The property owner shall pay the cost of the required sidewalks in
redeveloping areas meetinq the requirements of Section III, B.1.a.
above. The City shall have the option to pay for a portion or all of
the cost for sidewalks in all other redevelopinq areas.
3. All required sidewalks shall be installed prior to the issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy or final connection of utilities.
C. Existinq Developed Areas
1. Replacement of Sidewalks
In some areas where sidewalks have previously been constructed,
it is essential that they be kept in good state of repair and be
properly maintained. In certain cases poorly maintained sidewalks
constitute a greater hazard to pedestrians than no sidewalks at all.
a. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to inspect
existing sidewalk conditions in front, side, or behind his
property and to keep them in good repair. Faulty sidewalks
should be brought to the attention of the Department of
Public Works by the property owner.
Page 2 of 5
City of North Richland Hills, Texas Sidewalk Policy
b. After sidewalks in need of replacement have been identified,
the City will initiate corrective action and so notify the
affected property owner(s). Such notification will include the
project scope, the estimated cost of the project, and the
estimated cost for the individual property owner(s).
c. The City shall initiate the replacement of sidewalks upon
receipt of the property owner's share of the cost or
assessments having been formally made. In cases where a
hazard exists and the adjacent property owner refuses to
pay the property owner's share of the cost of replacement,
the City may file a lien on the adjacent property owner for the
value of the assessment.
d. The cost of replacing sidewalks will be the property owner's
responsibility.
2. New Sidewalks
a. In developed areas with no existing sidewalks, property
owners can request the installation of sidewalks by
petitioning the City. At a minimum, 80-percent of the
property owners along the block face must sign the petition
requesting the installation of the sidewalks. The 80-percent
will be determined by linear feet of frontage the petitioning
property owner's have to the total feet of frontage the block
has.
b. The cost of installing new sidewalks in developed areas will
be the property owner's responsibility.
c. When the City determines that a sidewalk is warranted to
provide for the safety and convenience of the public-at-Iarge,
no property owner participation will be required. This
determination will be made by the Public Works Department
using a "priority warranting system" which shall include but
may not be limited to such factors as number of pedestrians,
pedestrian accident history, vehicular volume, traffic speed,
and proximity to a school or place of public assembly (see
Attachment "A"). Such warranted sidewalks will be
constructed by the City as needed and shall be paid for 100-
percent by the City from the appropriate fund If funds are not
available from the current budget, the sidewalk construction
cost will be included in the following year's budget.
Page 3 of 5
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
Sidewalk Policy
D. City Improvement Projects
1. When the City remodels, improves or constructs a building (Le., fire
station, police station, garage, civic center), parkway improvements
will normally be a part of the work. These improvements will
consist of the installation of new sidewalks or the replacement of
deteriorated sidewalks adjacent to the property as deemed
necessary and desirable. The cost of this work will be paid for 100-
percent by the City and shall be included as a cost of the building
project.
2. When the City widens or reconstructs an existing street and it is
determined that sidewalks are necessary and desirable, the cost of
these sidewalks shall be paid for by the owners of the adjacent
properties in accordance with the Street Assessment Policy.
3. When the City reconstructs a street utilizinq Community
Development Block Grant funds throuqh HUD, the cost of any
sidewalks constructed will be paid for by the City.
IV. REQUIRED PUBLIC NOTICE
A. Assessments for the construction or replacement of all sidewalks will
require a public meeting as required by Ordinance of the City of North
Richland Hills and applicable State Law.
B. In all sidewalk cases requiring cost participation by the property owner(s),
the City will notify the affected property owner(s) of the project scope,
length, total estimated cost, and the estimated property owner's cost of
participation. Notice will be given of any required meeting, the meeting
date, time, and place, as required by law.
V. PAYMENT
A. The total amount of an assessment may be paid in a lump sum cash
payment, without interest, if payment is made within 30-days of
acceptance of the project by the City Council.
B. The assessment may be divided into five equal annual payments over a
four-year period with the first payment due within 30-days of acceptance
by the City Council, and with interest not to exceed the maximum
permitted by State law on the unpaid balance.
C. The assessment may be paid in monthly payments of $9.00 or more per
month of a maximum period of 49-months, with the interest rate pre-
computed and made a part of the monthly payment.
Page 4 of 5
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
Sidewalk Policy
D. In those cases where an existing sidewalk constitutes a hazard the
adjacent property owner refuses to pay the property owner's share and
the City Council has determined the necessity for the improvements and
has ordered the improvements, it will be necessary to obtain sealed bids
and let a contract for such work as required by law. One hundred-percent
of the cost as determined from the low bid shall be assessed against the
owners in accordance with applicable statues.
IV. EFFECTIVE DATE
This policy shall become effective upon the date of City Council approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 26th day of June, 2000.
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Page 5 of 5
,_..~ ··_,··.·..,.,_'__<~'..'·'4_·~~_"._·__~._,_..~.,~".,_~_~,_____~
ATTACHMENT "A"
PRIORITY WARRANTING SYSTEM
Points
>30 25
Number of pedestrians at peak hour 21 - 30 20
11 - 20 15
1 - 10 10
Routes serving schools or pedestrian- 1 - 3 blocks 15
generating facilities 4 - 7 blocks 10
> 7 blocks 5
Street classification Arterial> 48' roadway 20
Collector> 40' roadway 15
Residential < 40' roadway 10
Posted speed limit 40 mph or higher 15
35 mph 10
< 30 mph 5
Gaps in sidewalk network o - 50 feet 20
50 - 1 00 feet 15
100 - 200 feet 10
200 - 400 feet 5
> 400 feet 0
Location is a "priority warrant" and qualifies for sidewalk construction by the City with no
property owner participation if points earned are 50 or greater.
A IT ACHMENT "B"
Example of "Priority Warrant" Calculations
Susan Lee Lane from Lola Drive to Noreast Drive (existing homes)
· Number of pedestrians at peak hour:
21 - 30
=
20 points
· Routes serving schools or pedestrian generating facilities:
1 - 3 blocks =
15 points
· Street Classification:
< 40'
=
10 points
· Posted speed limit:
~ 30 mph
=
5 points
· Gaps in sidewalk network:
> 400 feet =
o points
Total points equal 50. Meets "priority warrant" for sidewalk.
Result:
This 1,100 foot section of Susan Lee lane would be defined as being
warranted. The City would pay for 100 percent of the overall cost (labor
and materials).
Estimated Cost: $29,600 for 2,200 linear feet of 4-foot wide sidewalk.
Property Owners' Cost: $0.00
City's Cost: $29,600
·
,
Present:
Absent:
MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE
PRE-COUNCIL ROOM AT CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - JUNE 12, 2000 - 5:45 P.M.
Charles Scoma
Lyle E. Welch
Russell Mitchell
Frank Metts, Jr.
JoAnn Johnson
Don Phifer
T. Oscar Trevino, Jr.
Larry J. Cunningham
Randy Shiflet
Steve Norwood
Greg Vick
Patricia Hutson
Alicia Richardson
Paulette Hartman
Rex McEntire
Greg Dickens
Larry Koonce
John Pitstick
Jenny Kratz
Melani Fragge
Mike Curtis
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilman
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Managing Director Community Services
City Secretary
Assistant City Secretary
Adm. Asst. to City Manager
Attorney
Public Works Director
Finance Director
Director of Development
Public Information Director
Human Resources Director
Assistant Public Works Director
Joe D. Tolbert
Councilman
ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order at
5:46 p.m.
DISCUSS ITEMS Agenda Item 12 - GN 2000-062 - In response to LARRY C.
FROM REGULAR several concerns from the Council on the need for
JUNE 12, 2000 safeguards to prevent abuse, Staff advised that a
CITY COUNCIL Management Policy would be enacted to regulate
AGENDA benefits for part-time employees to ensure that there
would be no abuse. Further regulations will also be
provided through the budget. The Management
Policy will provide the flexibility needed to work part-
time employees the hours needed while at the same
time prevent abuse. Staff advised the intent for part
time would be 20 to 30 hours per week and not to
consistently work someone beyond 30 hours per
week.
City Council Minutes
June 12, 2000
Page 2
-.- ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT
Agenda Item No. 6e- PU 2000-30 - Staff was asked NAN
for a list of the bidders. Staff advised that a
complete list was attached to the cover sheet.
Agenda Item No.1 0 - GN 2000-60 - Councilman STEVE N. I GREG D.
Mitchell questioned Item #4 on the cover sheet -
whether the property owner must pay the city before
the construction begins. Staff advised that would
apply to new sidewalks and not replacement
sidewalks. Councilman Mitchell expressed concern
with sidewalks being constructed by a City contractor
and if the sidewalks did not hold up, whose
responsibility it would be to replace bad sidewalks.
Staff advised that it would be the property owners
responsibility, which is also the current sidewalk
policy being followed today. Councilman Mitchell
questioned whether there was a time period
contractors would be responsible for workmanship.
Staff advised if the project were bid, there would
normally be a two-year or 20 percent maintenance
,- bond. Staff explained that the formal bid process
would add costs to the project because of
engineering and contract documents. These costs
would be passed on to the property owner. Most
likely sidewalk projects would be done by a city
contractor and there would probably be a 12-month
maintenance period. Property owners replacing
sidewalks themselves will be able to use a contractor
of their choice. This item was discussed further
during the regular Council meeting. During the
regular Council meeting, the Council voted to table
the item and for staff to clarify some of the wording
and bring back to the Council for further
consideration.
IR 2000-077 Council was advised that the Mayor would be unable NAN
DISCUSS to attend the July 24 Council meeting. Council was
POSSIBLE asked if they would like to consider changing the
CHANGE OF second meeting from July 24 to July 31. The
SECOND COUNCIL consensus of the Council was to not change the July
EETING IN JULY 24 meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Welch will conduct the
meeting or if in the event he is unable to do so,
Council will elect a Chair according to the Council
Rules of Procedure.
City Council Minutes
June 12, 2000
Page 3
.-
ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT
IR 2000-81 Staff reviewed the results of C2 Consulting's study of GREG V.
DISCUSS Charter's rates. Council direction was requested
RESUL TS OF and consensus reached was as follows:
CHARTER RATE
REVIEW 1) Council agreed to address the basic rate charge
and the installation and equipment charges in
separate ordinances.
2) Council agreed to adopt the installation and
equipment rates as recommended by the
consultant.
3) The refund and basic rate issues will be
discussed at a later date. City Manager Staff will
be meeting with Charter and receiving more
information. Staff will bring a report to the
Council after their meeting with Charter.
IR 2000-082 Mr. Shiflet explained that this item is a follow-up to
~\SCUSS CITIZEN an item brought before the Council on April 10 and
lr-4VOL VEMENTI April 29. The direction from the Council at these
LEADERSHIP meetings was for Staff to bring two or three options
WORKSHOP to the Council to consider for citizen involvement.
Staff presented four options for Council to consider:
1) Leadership NRH - full blown annual citizen
involvement/leadership program similar to
City of Allen and Northeast Chamber with
focus on entire community, not just city
government.
2) Less Formal Leadership Program -
Grapevine model - Modified approach from
above, primarily focusing on city government
(2 - 3 hours per month for 3-4 months
learning about city government, departments,
etc; 15 - 20 citizens; city operations).
3) Annual Session - "Short Course" -
Modification of 1 & 2 above with focus on city
government and citizen boards (2 sessions of
2 hours each to provide information and
r answer questions about roles, responsibilities
of Mayor, Council and staff; a discussion
devoted to citizen boards and commissions -
types, etc., selection process for boards and
commissions; about 50 maximum
City Council Minutes
June 12, 2000
Page 4
"-",
ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT
attendance).
4) Town Hall Meeting/Round Tables - One, two
(2) hour meeting with overview of city
government, roles and responsibilities, how to
get involved, then break up into 4 - 5 tables of
boards and commissions for questions and
answers. (Could provide for large group -
100 or so; very general information, not too
much focus on leadership, just involvement).
Mr. Shiflet called to the Council's attention the
estimated timeline attached to the IR. (Program
Development 4 - 8 weeks for staff preparation,
depending on option selected. Publicity - 4 weeks
minimum - printing and distribution of informational
brochures. Distribution method will impact timeline.
Selection/Size - 2 weeks minimum - formal process
to review applications and determine makeup of
participants. Notification - 2 weeks minimum -
contact all participants and notify them of selection to
the program and beginning date. Mr. Shiflet advised
that should Council desire to move forward with a
program, the earliest the program could begin would
be sometime during the Fall. The Council discussed
the different options presented. Concerns
expressed included 1) the amount of staff support
time that would be required; 2) a need to budget
funds to support a program of this type; 3)
expectations from the citizens that they will
automatically be placed on a board or commission
after completing the program - some Council
Members indicated that they preferred not to appoint
from a pool of applicants. Councilwoman Johnson
advised that should Council desire to go forward with
the program, that it not be advertised as doing
something for boards and commissions. The
purpose would be to educate citizens on how the city
operates. A majority of the Council expressed a
desire to implement Option NO.3. The Mayor
expressed to the Council that he felt the program
should be a two or three month program with one or
two sessions per month. The Council discussed the
time commitment they felt the program should take. LARRY C.
The consensus of the Council was to proceed with
Option No.3 as presented in the IR, that it would
City Council Minutes
June 12, 2000
Page 5
I
ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT
only be two (2) hour sessions, and the City Manager
was directed to prepare a program and curriculum
for two (2) hour sessions.
IR 2000-078 Mayor Scoma reported to the Council that this was NAN
DISCUSS FORUM an initiative presented at the U.S. Mayors'
REGARDING Conference. The initiative is a national effort to
"COMMITMENT TO focus on programs currently in existence to enhance
CHILDREN" and meet the needs of children and to promote
responsible fatherhood in families where there is not
a full family unit. He advised that he presented this
information to the Tarrant County Mayors' Council
and that Mayor Barr and Mayor Odom have
indicated they will support a Tarrant County initiative.
A meeting is planned for June 29 with community
providers in the County and other cities for the
purpose of discussing putting a forum together for
Tarrant County.
IR 2000-080 The City Manager advised the Council had been LARRY C.
DISCUSS invited to attend Trinity Railway's "Whistle Stop Tour"
ATTENDING on June 26. This tour conflicts with the regular City
TRINITY RAILWAY Council meeting. If the Council would like to
EXPRESS TRAIN participate in the "Whistle Stop Tour", Trinity Railway
RIDE - JUNE 26, has agreed to let Council off at the Bell/Hurst Plant.
4:30 P.M. TO 7:00 This will allow Council the opportunity to participate
P.M. and still attend the Council meeting. The consensus
was the Council will attend the Trinity Railway
Express "Whistle Stop Tour" and get off at the
Bell/Hurst stop. Council will meet at City Hall on
June 26 around 4:00 p.m. at City Hall and Staff will
make arrangements to transport the Council to the
station at Downtown Fort Worth and to pick Council
up in Hurst returning to City Hall in time for the Pre-
Council and Council meeting.
City Council Minutes
June 12, 2000
Page 6
,-
ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT
ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma announced at 6:45 p.m. that the NAN
meeting would adjourn to Executive Session for
deliberation regarding real property as authorized by
Government Code §551.052 for Rufe Snow and for
consultation with City Attorney as authorized by
Government Code §551.071 for Davis v. City of
North Richland Hills & et al. The Executive Session
adjourned at 6:55 p.m. to the regular Council
meeting.
Charles Scoma - Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson - City Secretary
--_._,--_.<._~-~-~,._~.,,<._--
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - JUNE 12,2000 - 7:00 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order June 12, 2000 at 7:01 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Charles Scoma
Lyle E. Welch
Russell Mitchell
Frank Metts, Jr.
JoAnn Johnson
Don Phifer
T. Oscar Trevino, Jr.
Absent:
Joe D. Tolbert
Staff:
Larry J. Cunningham
Randy Shiflet
Steve Norwood
Greg Vick
Patricia Hutson
Alicia Richardson
Rex McEntire
Mayor
Mayor Pro T em
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Managing Director of Community Services
City Secretary
Assistant City Secretary
Attorney
2.
INVOCATION
Councilwoman Johnson led the invocation.
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Girl Scout Troop 1262 presented the flags and led the invocation. Representing Troop
1262 were: Julia Anderson, Jessica Bailey, Kailee Carr, Kathryn Juren, Karen
Lehrmann, Melanie Morrison, Autumn Roach. Also present were Lisa Juren - Troop
Leader and Natice Henderson.
4.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
.-.-~_._----<--"->._~_.,--~------"'---
City Council Minutes
June 12, 2000
Page 2
PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL FLAG WEEK
In observance of National Flag Day, Mayor Scoma proclaimed June 14 as Flag Day in
North Richland Hills.
5.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
None.
6.
APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
APPROVED
A. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL GOAL SETTING WORKSHOP APRIL 28 - 29,
2000
B. MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING MAY 22,2000
C. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 22, 2000
D. PU 2000-029 - AUTHORIZE CONTRACT WITH BADGER METER, INC. FOR
PURCHASE OF WATER METERS - RESOLUTION NO. 2000-039
E. PU 2000-030 - AWARD ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR MISCELLANEOUS
CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS TO BARBARA'S CONCRETE - RESOLUTION NO.
2000-040
Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilman Phifer to approve the Consent
Agenda.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
7.
GN 2000-057 - YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE YEAR END REPORT
APPROVED
Mr. Tony Ortega - Youth Advisory Chairman presented the end of the year report for the
Youth Advisory Committee.
Councilman Trevino moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson to approve GN
2000-057.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
City Council Minutes
June 12, 2000
Page 3
8.
GN 2000-058 - AUTHORIZE COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEE TO REVIEW AND
RECOMMEND A POLICY REGARDING THE NAMING OF STREETS, PARKS,
PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES -
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-041
APPROVED
Mr. Cunningham advised Council under Section 7.1 of the Council Rules of Procedures
that were adopted by the City Council it states that the City Council may authorize the
appointment of an Ad-Hoc Council member committee and if such committee is
authorized, then the Mayor shall appoint members of the City Council to such
committees, subject to the approval of the Council. Mayor Scoma is proposing that an
Ad-Hoc Committee of the Council be appointed to review and recommend a policy
regarding the name of streets, parks, public buildings, and other public facilities. If such
a committee is appointed, it will review the current naming policies, review material from
other cities, consider information used by the Parks and Recreation Board, and
determine if and where any changes should be made or if additional criteria is needed
for naming facilities.
Councilwoman Johnson moved to approve GN 2000-058, Resolution No. 2000-041,
with the stipulation that the committee brings the first reports to Council within 90 days.
Councilman Mitchell seconded the motion.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
9.
GN 2000-059 - APPOINTMENTS OF COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEE TO REVIEW
AND RECOMMEND A POLICY REGARDING THE NAMING OF STREETS, PARKS,
PUBLIC BUILDINGS, AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES
APPROVED
Councilwoman Johnson moved to appoint Councilmen Metts, Trevino and Tolbert to
the Public Facilities Naming Ad-Hoc Committee. Councilman Mitchell seconded the
motion.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
10.
GN 2000-060 - APPROVE SIDEWALK POLICY - ORDINANCE NO. 2484
TABLED
City Council Minutes
June 12, 2000
Page 4
Mr. Greg Dickens, Public Works Director, summarized GN 2000-060, Ordinance No.
2484.
Council expressed concerns to Staff regarding the sidewalk policy. Concerns included:
property owners paying 100% for sidewalks in redeveloped areas, work bonds and
protection for the City in regards to faulty work.
Mr. Cunningham advised Council that they could table this item. Staff could have
another work session and work through the details, address Council's concerns and
bring back to Council for reconsideration.
Councilman Trevino moved to table GN 2000-060, Ordinance No. 2484.
Councilwoman Johnson seconded the motion.
Motion to table carried 6-0.
11.
GN 2000-061 - SUSPENDING THE PROPOSED EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE
PROPOSED RATE SCHEDULES OF TXU GAS (TXU LONE STAR GAS)-
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-042
APPROVED
Mr. Vick summarized GN 2000-061, Resolution No. 2000-042. Mr. Vick advised
Council that TXU - Lone Star Gas Company filed a request to increase the rates for
natural gas service in North Richland Hills along with twenty-two other cities in its Fort
Worth Distribution System. Under the Gas Utility Regulatory Act Council may suspend
operation of the increased rates for 90 days beyond the date that the rate would
ordinarily go into effect. Staff recommends that Council should suspend TXU - Lone
Star Gas rates for the 90-day period allowed and that the rates be analyzed, and
possibly work with other cities in a rate study with the passage of Resolution
No. 2000-042.
Councilman Trevino moved, seconded by Councilman Mitchell to approve GN 2000-
061, Resolution No. 2000-042.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
12.
GN 2000-062 - APPROVE AMENDMENT TO CIVIL REGULATIONS ON PART-TIME
EMPLOYEES ORDINANCE NO. 2485
APPROVED
City Council Minutes
June 12, 2000
Page 5
Ms. Melani Fragge advised Council that on May 16, 2000 the Civil Service Commission
approved an amendment to the part-time employee status in the Civil Service
Regulations. It is proposed that Council approve the recommendation of the Civil
Service to amend Civil Service Rules and Regulations - Section 9.03(b), 9.04(b), 9.11
and 10.05. The amendment will eliminate the part-time benefit language from the Civil
Service Rules and Regulations and be regulated through Management Policy. Staff
recommends approval of Ordinance Number 2845.
Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Metts to approve GN 2000-
062, Ordinance No. 2485.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
13.
PW 2000-018 - APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO.1 IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,918
FOR RUFE SNOW DRIVE, SECTION C (HIGH LAWN TERRACE TO BURSEY ROAD)
APPROVED
Mr. Mike Curtis, Public Works Assistant Director, summarized PW 2000-18.
Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilman Mitchell to approve PW 2000-018.
Motion to approve carried 6-0.
14.
(A) CITIZENS PRESENTATION
None.
(B) INFORMATION AND REPORTS
IR 2000-079 - REGIONAL AND LOCAL WATER SUPPLY; CURRENT CONDITIONS
AND FORECAST
Mr. Greg Dickens advised Council of North Richland Hills water supply.
. North Richland Hills Junior Open Tennis Tournament to be held June 23-25. Please
call 427-6680 for more information.
City Council Minutes
June 12, 2000
Page 6
· North Richland Hills Camp Dates:
Enviro Camp
Camp NRH Session 4
Camp NRH Session 5
NRH20 Dive in Movie
NRH20 Dive in Movie
June 13 - 15
June 19
June 26
June 23
June 30
For additional information on the camps, please call 427-6600.
16.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Scoma adjourned the meeting at 8:13 pm.
Charles Scoma - Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson - City Secretary
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Administration
Council Meeting Date: 06/26/00
Subject: Aoorove Resolution No. 2000-37 - ReoealinQ
Resolution No. 99-10
Agenda Number: GN 2000-062
Mayor Pro Tem Lyle Welch has requested that this Resolution No. 2000-37 be prepared
and considered on this agenda as a consent item. The City Attorney has prepared
Resolution No. 2000-37 that would repeal Resolution 99-10.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds AvallalJle
Department Head Signature
Finance Director
...
Page 1 of
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-37
BET IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1.
Resolution No. 99-10 be, and is hereby, in all things repealed.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 26th day of June, 2000.
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
-\ ...
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
'--Oepartment: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 6/26/00
PW 2000-019
Subject: Approve City-Developer AQreement for CIP Sewer System Agenda Number:
Improvements with TMC Management Company -
Sanitary Sewer Main BB1.1 - Resolution No. 2000-043
In accordance with the State law and the City's Impact Fee Ordinance No. 2241, any
eligible water or wastewater projects constructed by the City or Developer can receive
reimbursement from the Impact Fee Fund. Projects which are eligible are those shown in
the current Impact Fee Study to be in the 1 O-year Capital Improvements Program. Each
eligible project listed in the study has been evaluated to determine to what percent of its
total capacity does it serve future development. This percentage is used to determine the
maximum amount of its total cost the City will reimburse.
TMC Management Company (Developer) is ready to install the proposed sanitary sewer
main from the east side of Lot 73, Block 2, Steepleridge Addition, east along the north
property line of Peck Survey, Tract 11 C, across Davis Boulevard south along the east side
of Davis Boulevard, and across Precinct Line Road south approximately 420'. This 8"
sanitary sewer main (881.1) is included in the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study
(Study) dated July 31, 1997 by Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. The improvements as
\......' outlined in the Study are eligible for reimbursement based on a maximum total cost of up
to $92,506 times the appropriate percentage. On this project this reimbursement amount
calculates to a maximum of $65,568.31.
Upon Council's approval of this agreement and in accordance with the Impact Fee
Ordinance No. 2241, the Developer will receive reimbursement upon completion and
acceptance of the improvements. The final reimbursement will not exceed $65,568.31.
Recommendation: To pass Resolution No. 2000-043.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
~
02-90-19-6000; 99-02-90-019
Account Number 401-0000-712.79-00
Sufficient Funds AvallaDle
Finance Director
- - ---_.~---~~~.~->--,,~~'._-----,
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-043
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1.
The City Manager be and is hereby authorized to execute the attached City-
Developer Agreement with TMC Management Company concerning impact fee
reimbursement for Sanitary Sewer Main BB 1.1, located in the northeast corner of the
City limits across and along Davis Boulevard near Precinct Line Road.
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 26th day of June, 2000.
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson, City Secretary
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
CITY-DEVELOPER AGREEMENT
THE STATE OF TEXAS
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
THE COUNTY OF TARRANT:
That, TMC Management Company of the County of Tarrant, State of Texas,
hereinafter called "Developer" and the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, State of
Texas, hereinafter called "City", enter into the following contract:
In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and for the purpose of
providing sanitary sewer system improvements as indicated in the construction documents
titled "Sanitary Sewer BBl.!" the Developer and the City hereto agree:
1. The developer has paid to the City all processing fees and has furnished the necessary
permits, easements, and right-of-way as required for the construction of the above
referenced facilities. In addition, the Developer has delivered construction plans,
specifications and all other necessary contract documents prepared by a registered
professional engineer, and will also furnish construction surveying, cut sheets and field
adjustments.
2. The Developer has entered into a contract with the Contractor who will perform the
work and who will be paid by the Developer as specified in the construction contract
documents. Monthly pay estimates shall be subject to City's review.
3. The Developer agrees to provide, at no cost to the City, all testing necessary to insure
that the construction is in accordance with the project specifications and the City
standards.
4. The Developer understands and agrees that he has no authority to cancel, alter or
amend the terms of the construction contract without specific written authority of the
City, and that he shall be responsible for paying the costs of any cancellations,
additions, alterations or amendments to the contract unless specifically provided
otherwise by written authorization from the City.
5. The contractor has provided to the City, on City forms, a 2-year maintenance bond in
the amount of twenty (20 %) percent of the contract price.
6. The City agrees to participate in the cost of the facilities after construction is complete
and accepted. The description and amount of participation is as follows:
TMC Management Company
Sanitary Sewer Main BBl.l
Page 1 of3
In accordance with Ordinance No. 2241, the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee
Ordinance, the City will reimburse the Developer the eligible impact fee funds for the
proposed improvements. The City shall only reimburse the Developer the amount
agreed upon below, after the construction of the improvements is complete and
accepted by the City. If the actual amount paid to the contractor is less than the bid
amount, the City participation will be reduced accordingly.
WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE STUDY
d d J I 31 1997
ate my , ,
Maximum
Total Total Cost Eligible City's
Facilities Assessable per Bid Percent Participation
Cost per Study
SEWER:
8" Sewer Main: BB 1.1 $67,548.00 $89,795.00 73.02 % $65,568.31
East from Lot 73,
Block 2, Steepleridge
Addition, along the
north property line of
Tr. 11 C, Peck Survey,
then across Davis
Blvd. and south along
east side of Davis
Blvd., across Precinct
Line Road south for
approximately 420'.
Total $67,548.00 $89,795.00 $65,568.31
Total Max. Reimbursement $65,568.31
7. The City will provide the inspections as required and upon satisfactory completion of
the work, the City will accept ownership and operation of the system subject to the
terms of the maintenance bonds.
8. The Developer further covenants and agrees to, and by these presents does hereby,
fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, and employees
from all suites, actions or claims of any character, whether real or asserted, brought for
or on account of any injuries or damages sustained by any persons (including death) or
to any property, resulting from or in connection with the construction, design,
performance or completion of any work to be performed by said developer, his
contractors, subcontractors, officers, agents or employees, or in consequence of any
failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or
otherwise, neglect or misconduct of said developer, his contractors, subcontractors,
officers, agents, or employees, whether or not such injuries, death or damages are
caused, in whole or in part, by the alleged negligence of the City of North Richland
Hills, its officers, agents, servants, employees, contractors or subcontractors.
TMC Management Company
Sanitary Sewer Main BB1.1
Page 2 of 3
9. Upon completion of the work, good and sufficient title to all facilities constructed
warranted free of any liens or encumbrances is hereby vested in the City of North
Richland Hills.
10. Special provisions: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to these presents have executed this Contract in four (4)
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original on this the 14- th day of
~ ,2000.
() TMC Management Company
~~-
By: -::r~s. l-1.}.rE=()~
(Printed name and title) A ~.s.; 6e..ú\
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF ~r
?OÐO
This instrument was acknowledged heforeme on, Qu.~ 14 , ~by
$M1ê.~'::' M4~ ,~ ,TMC Management Company.
(name) (title)
Commission Expires:
(S
GREGORY W. DICKENS
Nowy Public, State of Texas
My Commission Expires
Septlmber 11.2003
Notary Public Printed Name
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Larry J. Cunningham, City Manager
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson, City Secretary
TMC Management Company
Sanitary Sewer Main BBl.l
Page 3 of 3
~
...
í
-'
\0
-.
.-_..-......-_._...~.
-..-..! ;
/
/
.1
"-j.
'::¡Ii'-A~O"\ [14
... -/-..' . ,
..j'
/ .
1\\ 1000
- 1:-;: :~:¡
i ..
I
I
o 1 ;·i a \ ';, T 7 -- (1 '?
:J~9[
;r ::¡¡'Ç¡
i
J. ¡ v!..J l UL uv·-,i..J
1 rJ I
~~~E
a: en .
>< ;
.J ~ ¡
~flJíÕ'
0°""
... u !
I
...... ¡
- III .....
zo~
;:)u I
~
......
"we;;:
zw_
w'" '
...
.tn
:¡¡W-J
~~"',
õ~l
~J
a:~
Q « !
W I
~ !
II:: I
W I
"'w I
~::I!""'¡
~~l
w . ¡
A. 0 JÑ'.'
¡;z
o .
¡¡:o_
CZ,
~
'"
...
N
CD
;:I;
...
~
Q
...
o
...
æ;
o
CD
ItI
GO
.
N
...
o
Q
o
N
...
~
...:
'"
...
;¡¡t
N
o
n
...
0)
o
'"
r..i
'"
...
N
N
c:i
~
8
'"
'"
CD
-
åJ
CD
a:
L1i
III
C)
ã:i
cå
III
«>
8
o
CD'
...
'"
'"
...
....
~
o
...
o
...
:>
UJ
o
<D
'"
o
<Ð
..
...
...
'"
a>
'"
...
....
<or
...
f
'"
cD
""
'"
'"
""
...¡
'"
...
N
N
<:>
....
...
o
;1;-
GO
..,
..:.
c<:
L1i
CD
IU
~
:::;
n
..:.
'"
N
:!
...-
'"
~
<>
<Ð
'"
...
<>
...
o
...
:>
w
o
N
<or
....
...
...
'"
CD
...
<:>
<>
",-
'"
...
~
o
'"
0)
...
GO
ItI
....
",.
GO
...
N
...
o
....
...
<>
...
~
""
'"
..:.
a:
i1j
CD
w
~
:::;
N
n
..:.
'"
-
¡'" Iv 'H. I vI1-C1'tVL, ..:J!1-r LI..iWCI\..:J
o
..
'"
CD
>(
,..:
..
...
""
N
.,.
N
...
~
Ü
'"
'"
'"
...:
....
...
GO
'"
'"
~
N
ri
....
...
"e
<:>
""
N
...
...
'"
...
Ò
....
...
....
N
o
~
<:>
<0
....
'"
...J
a:
i1j
CD
w
....
f::
:::;
0-:
..:.
'"
....
<>
'"
'"
N
'"
",'
...
o
>(
co
",.
...
...
o
...
o
...
:>
w
o
...
N
GO
",'
...
'"
~
a>
<:>
'"
cø
a;
...
..
;;t
...
'"
co>
....
....
¡g'
..
N
N
c:i
....
...
Q
..,
"..¡
""
or
...
c<:
L1i
III
w
...
f::
:::;
0-:
,.
...
<or
N
'"
N
...
ri
..,
...
Q
..
o
...
:>
w
o
'"
;ø
",'
...
..
'"
'"
'"
N
...
",'
on
..
';t
GO
g
....
'"
~.
...
....
N
o
....
III
o
It>
It>.
'"
..
.....
c<:
L1i
III
w
....
f::
:::;
0-:
-
..
...
'"
N
'"
q;
tr;
..
'"
c
.....
...
'"
GO
....
....
....
...
C>
...
o
..
:>
w
o
'"
<0
...:
..
'"
'"
'"
-
<ø
GO
...
...-
....
...
~
.
'"
g
õ
;I'}'
'"
...
N
N
ci
~
<:>
...
"'-
GO
-
..
...
~
III
w
...
f::
:::;
N
-
..
...
'"
N
o
..
o
...
:>
w
o
<>
...
",.
...
""
'"
'"
...
...
...
a;
...
...
;;t
«>
-:
cø
'"
...
....
CD.
~
N
N
c:i
...
...
~
-
--
II>
cD
....
a:
<
W
CD
uJ
~
:::;
co>
-
'"
.....
'"
N
C>
....
0)-
...
...
....
..,
<Ð
co>
...
C>
..
>
w
o
.....
'"
'"
..
co
'"
'"
'"
'"
C>
",-
...
..
~
'"
.,j
CD
N
'"
...
",'
,.,
II>
N
N
C>
....
...
'"
N
'"
II>
~
a:
I1i
CD
w
t
:::;
...
"'
....
on
N
,....
..
,.,
,..;
..
'"
<.:>
o
<:J'
...
..
'"
'"
'"
.....
'"
..
C>
'"
C>
...
co
..
>
u
o
'"
'"
....
...
'"
'"
'"
..,
'"
'"'
,..;
'"
...
;;t
"'
'"
II>
....
....
....
,..,
..
'"
N
Co
...
..
g
,...
'"
-
cD
....
a:
<
UJ
CD
w
t
:::;
~
..
.....
'"
N
.;
..,
.
...
....
...
....
tr;
..
:0
'"
,~....
....
...
co
..
C>
..
>
!OJ
:;)
...
<XI
....
~.
...
g¡
..
'"
-r;
...
..
~
C>
C>
6
II>
C>
N
'"
",-
'"
..
'"
'"
cD
....
..
'"
N
o
N-
~
o
..:.
a:
L1i
CD
UJ
.....
f::
:::;
'"
c::i
...:.
'"
N
'"
~
N
",-
:;;
'"
GO
C>
....
'"
...
C>
..
<:>
..
:>
w
o
'"
...
N
'i
III
..,
g
'"
'"
'"
-oi
..
'"
~
C>
C>
<>
'"
...
...
N.
GO
..
N
N
c:i
...
..
o
'"
o
",'
'"
o
..:.
a:
L:j
CD
w
.....
f::
:::;
<or
g
..:.
'"
'"
r :1,'\ i'HJ, 01 I J::J"i" JO..:1
o
'"
<:>
..
>
W
o
CD
-
...
-:i
'"
'"
g¡
-
'"
N
'"
",'
~
>t
<ø
'"
.,
...
...
....
"'.
-
'"
..
....
N
c:i
...
...
o
N
o
N
CD
....
or
L1i
CD
w
.....
f::
:::;
'"
-
-
..:.
....
'"
'"
~.
...cri
UI/
!!f~S
o~-:
fz
II::
W I
5 <Ii I
¡¡j¡nä;'
> I/ ::J
~~ I
I
cri I
I/ I
...--F~
uz-
i~ \
~~.J
U~;J
~ I
...i i
~~~~
U ~,
~ . i
Z....,:....!
:¡~z~cn~
a: 0 0 en 0 -,
>-w..Ztnu-ï
§J ~ < I
cn"'CIJ!
..... (I >' .._
-J1oUa:: a....-,_.-.¡
-...< 00«-
=è3= ff~::¡
o~~ i
Z\I, II) I
< i,,¡J.a: .
....u.._ :g~~ .
<::t¡'" ~~~~
cÞc;,¡<O Cl:enu-
c:i-o..lLI >< 'I
1:or~~
j=ffia
m......w
<0::: «a:
...O~~
Z:¡;~
....~~
0>....
00
~~:;;
-oro
c;,¡~u
~ê
i
¡::
""
u.I
....
<Ð
...
;;
co
'"
on
",¡
'"
..
=>
,..,
.,
",-
'"
...
'"
..
'"
...
:>
""
o
..,
'"
.....
==
N
8
'"
'"
...
...,
",'
'"
..
~
¡,
'"
'"
'"
...
'"
....-
'"
...
N
N
'"
...
...
C>
'"
to.
'"
,.,.
-J
~
::
w
Ë
,..;
...J
,,;
~
....
...
N
~
<Ð
<0
...
n
..
'"
..
>
W
o
c
...
~.
..
....
s¡
N
...
<0
rD"
:s¡
~
8
o
rD
co>
'"
CD
",-
'"
...
""
'"
cD
...
..
C>
'"
"'.
o
'"
...
...J
~
L .
CD
uJ
.....
~
:::;
.....
~
..:.
'"
'"
.....
'"
en
....
..
'"
:i_
'"
...
'"
...
o
'"
>
W
o
N
'"
GO
....
...
...
g:
rD
CO
"'.
-
'"
..
~
<>
<>
o
'"
o
~
œ'
'"
...
..,
'"
....
..,
..
o
co
.-
... '" '"
o '"
~ ~ ~
~ ~ Æ
CD CD CD
uJ W uJ
~ ~ ~
:::¡ ~ ~
cn
c:i
..:.
...
'"
....
'"
-
",i
...
r--
..,
r--
",'
:;
'"
..
<:>
...
:>
UJ
o
....
CD
N'
;;
g¡
....
~
...
",'
...
..
~
õ
o
o
co
..,
..,
CD
Ò
'"
..
N
....
<>
....
III
'"
o
c::i
~
'"
..,
...
....
....
..,
'"
'"
..
o
...
::>
UJ
o
...
~
~-
..
8
'"
...
...
~.
...
...
;¡¡t
..
'"
...
....
ItI
'"
...
~.
..
N
....
o
...
..
o
.,.
'"'.
N
-
-
..:.
~
....
....
",'
...
N
'"
...
....
..
co
....
'"'
.....
'"
..
o
..
o
..
>
W
o
N
'"
...
-:,.
N
8
N
'"
'"
....
.....
..,
..
;¡¡t
...
N
CD
'"
en
N
CD.
.,.
'"
N
N
o
...
...
'"
....
0_
...
-
U
>-
~
o
.....
.....
<
U
U
at
...
o
...
....
..
'"
rD
CD
'"
'"
...
'"
..
o
...
:>
w
o
o
...
....
...
'"
'"
'"
rD
CD
rD
",.
CD
...
;¡¡t
'"
o
""
'"
'"
'"
CO
.....
'"
..
N
N
'"
...
'"
'"
""
'"
N'
CD
..
'"
U
>-
~
o
....
.....
<
U
-:
-
.;,
N
U
-
...
o
.,
'"
",'
..
CD
....
co.
....
..
'"
...
o
...
::>
uJ
o
o
'"
'"
'IÕ
....
....
'"
""
N
'"
....
co_
....
...
>t
ø
....
.,.,
""
...
..,
CD
~.
..
CD
'"
co>
'"
..
C>
<:>
<D
.,.
.....
a:
L1i
CD
uJ
~
::¡
-
....
....
N
...
<D
è!i
'IÕ
...
'"
o
..
a
o
...
~
o
co
~
",-
;x
....
8
N
^
o
...
~
8
C>
<0
Ó
'IÕ
;x
N
N
o
...
..
o
'"
-.
'"
o
...J
0:::
i1j
III
uJ
E:
::¡
II>
~
..:.
~
...
8
<or
co'
...
'"
o
'"
",'
N
...
o
..
o
..
>
UJ
o
8
...
~
....
'"
CD
N
C>
"'.
'"
N
...
~
<>
'"
N
8
~.
..
""
..,
<0
...
...
o
'"
co
<>
<>
..:.
c:::
i5
III
uJ
.....
~
:::;
~
..:.
~
o
'"
...,
",'
...
<:>
N
N
N
...
a
o
...
~
o
o
'"
'"
';i
<D
'"
'"
-
o
N
N
N
...
~
~
o
'"
N
'"
....
...-
N
...
N
N
o
...
...
~
'"
'"
o
..:.
a:
L1i
a:I
w
....
f::
:::;
a:
~
CD
ILl
.....
Ë
....
...
6
..:.
..
-
..:.
~
~
r. U¿¡U~
o
..
.(
co
..
i'
II.
..;
~
~
W
I/
~I
II::
Z
o
..
~
'"
tri
..
~
"'.
N
..
~
Ü
....
'"
..,
~
CD
'"
CD
rD
'"
....
'"
..
~
ø
CD
co
...
N
'"
....
,..:
.....
..
N
N
ci
~
o
CD
<D
'"
...J
~
...
II>
...
o
..
e
....
¡¡¡
o
.....-
-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Police Department
Council Meeting Date: 6/26/00
Subject: Resolution of Support for Ten-Year Continuation of the Crime Control Agenda Number: GN 2000-063
And Prevention District - Resolution No. 2000-045
Passage of the Crime Control and Prevention District in 1996 provided a means to finance
progressive law enforcement and maintenance of order inside the city limits without additional ad
valorem taxes imposed on our citizens. The combination of a large daytime population and the
natural growth of the community create a great demand for police services.
A significant majority (up to 75%) of the payment of the % cent sales tax levied under the Crime
Control and Prevention District is made by persons who are not residents of North Richland Hills,
but who significantly contribute to the need for increased and enhanced police services in this city.
Law enforcement goals and objectives for the Crime Control and Prevention District revenues were
defined to meet the needs of the community and ensure the safety of our citizens. These goals
and objectives have been significantly met or exceeded over the last four years. It is desirable and
advantageous to the City that a high level of police services has been established, and the
continuation of this high level of police services is essential to ensure the welfare of our citizens
and their property.
It is proposed that the City Council support a continuation of the Crime Control and Prevention
District for the period of ten years, minimum.
RECOMMENDATION: Pass Resolution No. 2000-045.
~-
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
:~s~~
v Department He d Signature
Finance Review
Account Number
S~dl~
Budget Director
Page 1 of L
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-045
WHEREAS, passage of the Crime Control and Prevention District in 1996 provided a
means to finance progressive law enforcement and maintenance of order inside the city
limits without additional ad valorem taxes imposed on our. citizens; and
WHEREAS, a significant majority of the payment of the ~ cent sales tax levied under the
Crime Control and Prevention District is made by persons who are not residents of North
Richland Hills, but who significantly contribute to the need for increased and enhanced
police services in this city; and
WHEREAS, law enforcement goals and objectives for the Crime Control and Prevention
District revenues have been significantly met or exceeded; and
WHEREAS, it is observed to be desirable and advantageous to the City that a high level
of police services has been established, evaluated, and found to be effective; and
WHEREAS, the continuation of this high level of police services is considered desirable
and essential to ensure the welfare of our citizens and their property;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, THAT, it is deemed desirable and advantageous to the City
in all aspects that the Crime Control and Prevention District should continue as it
presently does, and its continuance for an additional ten year term merits the full and
complete support of the City Council.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 26th day of June 2000.
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
. Department: City Secretary
Council Meeting Date: 6/26/00
Subject: Consideration of AmendinQ Council Rules of Procedure - Agenda Number: GN 2000-064
Resolution No. 2000-47
In order to clarify the procedures used at Council meetings regarding presentations and
public hearings before the Council, staff suggests that the Council Rules of Procedure be
amended to include what is in practice. Attached is a Resolution and Ordinance that
states the public hearing/public presentation procedures currently in use. These are the
same as those shown on the viewing screen prior to Council meetings and on the
"Request to Speak" forms provided on a table in the Council Chamber Room.
According to the Rules of Procedure, before the Council can take formal action to approve
an ordinance amending the Rules, any amendments must first be introduced into record at
a previous Council meeting. Resolution No. 2000-47 introduces into record the Council's
desire to amend the Council Rules of Procedure. An ordinance will then be placed on the
July 10 Council Agenda for Council to take official action.
Recommendation:
To approve Resolution No. 2000-47 entering into record the Council's desire to amend the
Council Rules of Procedure.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds AvallaOle
@øvitd ~
Department Head Signature
Finance Director
Page 1 of L
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-47
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1.
Ordinance No. 2488 has been received by the City and its is ordered that it be
placed on the next regular agenda for consideration and/or approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 26th day of June, 2000.
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex
ORDINANCE NO. 2488
WHEREAS, this Ordinance amending the Council Rules of Procedure
(Ordinance No. 984) was duly received by the City Council at its regular meeting of
June 26, 2000; and
WHEREAS, it was ordered by the Council on June 26, 2000 that this Ordinance
be placed on the July 10, 2000 Agenda for consideration and/or approval.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1.
Section 5.5 of the Council Rules of Procedure is hereby amended and shall
hereafter read as follows:
5.5 Presentations by the Public
5.5.1 Any person desiring to present a subject for City Council consideration shall
advise the City Manager's office of the fact not later than 5:00 p.m., on
Wednesday preceding the meeting at which he wishes to have the subject to be
considered. Said person shall make himself available for a conference with the
City Manager a the Manager's request at some time prior to said Council
meeting.
5.5.2 Any person wishing to speak at a Public Hearing scheduled on the agenda shall
complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card and present it to the City Secretary
prior to the matter being reached. Upon being recognized by the Mayor, the
person may speak or present evidence relevant to the matter being heard. No
person may speak without first being recognized by the Mayor. All persons
wishing to speak on the matter shall be limited to three minutes each and there is
a cumulative limit of sixty minutes for all those speaking in favor of an item and a
like limit for those speaking in opposition. The time limit may be extended by a
majority vote of the Council. The Mayor may also, with the concurrence of the
City Council, alter any of the enumerated time allocations based on the
complexity of the item and the number of persons wishing to speak on the item.
5.5.3 In order to expedite matters and to avoid repetitious presentations, the
designation of a spokesperson is encouraged. Whenever any group of
individuals wishes to address the Council on the same subject matter, those
individuals are encouraged to designate a spokesperson to address the City
Council. A spokesperson speaking for ten or more individuals present in the
Council Chambers shall be limited to a ten-minute presentation. Other members
of the group cannot speak. The Mayor or City Secretary must be advised prior to
the start that a group presentation will be made. The Mayor may ask group
members to stand to confirm ten individuals are present.
5.5.4 During Public Hearings, no person will be permitted to speak about matters or
present evidence which is not germane to the matter being considered. A
determination of relevance shall be made by the Mayor, but may be appealed to
the full City Council.
5.5.5 Public Meeting Appearance Cards may be used by members of the public who
do not wish to or cannot verbally address the City Council during a meeting. A
person may indicate his/her comments and support or opposition for an agenda
item on a Public Meeting Appearance Card. During the public testimony
regarding the item, the Mayor will indicate that the City Council has received
written comments from (name of persons) in support of the project or issue and
from (name of persons) in opposition. The minutes will reflect the City Council's
receipt of written comments in support or opposition of the project or issue.
5.5.6 A speaker shall not present the same or substantially the same items or
arguments to the Council repeatedly or be repetitious in presenting their oral
comments. Nothing in the foregoing precludes submission of comments to the
City Council in writing, for such action or non-action as the Council, in its
discretion, may deem appropriate. No person may speak twice to the same item
until all persons wishing to speak have been recognized. A person will only be
allowed to speak a second time when there is new evidence to present and the
Mayor, with the concurrence of the City Council, rules that there is good cause to
do so.
5.5.7 Any of the foregoing rules may be waived or suspended by a majority vote of the
Councilmembers present when it is deemed that there is good cause to do so,
based upon the particular facts and circumstances involved.
5.5.8 The Citizens' Comments portion of the City Council meeting is set aside for
members of the public to address the City Council on any item of business that is
not formally scheduled on the agenda or scheduled as a public hearing.
Members of the public should complete a Public Meeting Appearance Card prior
to the item being heard and present it to the City Secretary. Citizens' comments
are generally permitted at the end of the regular City Council meeting, as
specified on the agenda. Presentations shall be limited to three minutes each.
Citizens' comments shall be limited to a cumulative total not to exceed fifteen
minutes for all speakers. Presentations under citizens' comments are limited to
items within the subject matter of the jurisdiction of the City. In compliance with
the Texas Open Meetings Act, the City Council may not deliberate or vote on any
matter raised in citizens comments, except for the purpose of determining
whether such mater should be placed on a future City Council agenda. The
Mayor, however, may request the City Manager to provide additional information
on a matter of general interest to the full City Council, the public at large and to
the citizen making the comment.
Ordinance No. 2488
Page 2 of 3
5.5.9 The Mayor should announce at public hearings involving more than ten
individuals the need to maintain proper decorum in order to hear all view points
and to refrain from speaking while others are speaking, clapping, etc. to express
support or opposition to comments made.
2.
These amendments in this Ordinance shall become a part of the Council Rules of
Procedure from and after the date of passage of this ordinance.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day of July, 2000.
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma - Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson - City Secretary
Ordinance No. 2488
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Subject: Approve Sidewalk Policy - Ordinance No. 2484
Council Meeting Date: 6/26/00
Agenda Number: GN 2000-065
"L:>epartment: Public Works
Staff has made the changes requested by Council at the last meeting concerning
sidewalks in redeveloping areas (see pages 2 and 4). A minor change in wording was
made on page 3. This item will be on the Pre Council Agenda for discussion.
Recommendation: To approve Ordinance No. 2484 and create a Sidewalk Construction
Fund in the 2000-2001 City Budget with a beginning balance of $50,000.
'-
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
'-
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds AVaJlaDle
Finance Director
Page 1 of _
.._~____,_._._______~___...._.~__._~,_____'___%~,._._..""wo._ _
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
Sidewalk Policy
ORDINANCE NO. 2484
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills finds a need for
more pedestrian walkways in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills wants to
encourage the construction and reconstruction of sidewalks in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is willing to participate in the cost of sidewalk
construction when deemed appropriate.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of North Richland Hills,
Texas, that:
I. PURPOSE
It is the intent of this policy to encourage the construction and/or reconstruction of
sidewalks throughout the City for the safety and convenience of pedestrians.
II. DESIGN STANDARDS
The design and construction of sidewalks shall conform to City standards and
shall provide, at a minimum, a four-foot wide concrete sidewalk located
approximately 5-1/2 feet behind the back-of-curb, or a five-foot wide concrete
walkway located immediately behind the back-of-curb. The specific design and
placement of the sidewalk may vary depending upon location and extenuating
circumstances, however, the Public Works Department shall approve the final
design. In all cases, the placement of the sidewalk shall provide a continuous
walkway for the pedestrian and will be compatible with other existing sidewalks in
the neighborhood. Curb ramps will be required at the corners of all intersections
as sidewalks are constructed.
III. SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS
A. New Developinq Areas
1. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all new streets.
2. In developing areas, sidewalks should normally be installed along
with the construction of homes, offices, buildings, etc. so as to
avoid being damaged by heavy trucks during that stage of
development. The City Building Official will require that sidewalks
that were required at the time of platting be installed during the
construction of buildings on the lot(s) and prior to the issuance of
the Certificate of Occupancy and/or final connection of utilities.
Page 1 of 5
.___^~,.'_"__ ___~_.__..,".__.._".__"~"_'~ '_~__~~_.".__'_~__MO"_~_'__~"'."~'_'_'"___'''<'''_'''''_..,,_~~,. m~~'___~'_._'~"'._~'"_^__"'""______·~_________________"_"·_···_
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
Sidewalk Policy
3. The cost of required sidewalks in new developing areas shall be
paid by the builder and/or property owner.
B. Redevelopinq Areas (develooments beinq exoanded or reconstructed)
1. Sidewalks shall be required in redeveloping areas under the same
conditions as new developing areas. An area shall be considered
to be redeveloping for purposes of this policy when:
a.!.iJ A building permit is issued in an amount equal to or greater
than 50-percent of the fair market value of the existing
improvements (as determined by the City Building Official);
and
.illJ There are sidewalks existing along the rest of the block face;
or the property on which the building permit is issued has a
frontage of 300-feet or more, or extends for 50-percent or
more of the block face-;-; or
b. The property is located in a residential area identified and
tarqeted by the City Council for redevelopment.
2. The property owner shall pay the cost of the required sidewalks in
redeveloping areas meetinq the requirements of Section III. B.1.a.
above. The City shall have the option to pay for a portion or all of
the cost for sidewalks in all other redevelopinq areas.
3. All required sidewalks shall be installed prior to the issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy or final connection of utilities.
C. Existinq Developed Areas
1 . Replacement of Sidewalks
In some areas where sidewalks have previously been constructed,
it is essential that they be kept in good state of repair and be
properly maintained. In certain cases poorly maintained sidewalks
constitute a greater hazard to pedestrians than no sidewalks at all.
a. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to inspect
existing sidewalk conditions in front, side, or behind his
property and to keep them in good repair. Faulty sidewalks
should be brought to the attention of the Department of
Public Works by the property owner.
Page 2 of 5
--~~.~,------_...,--~~~_._-~--_.,,-_.~._,...~-_..-._~--_.-._.-^~-,_.'---'---"~
City of North Richland Hills, Texas Sidewalk Policy
b. After sidewalks in need of replacement have been identified,
the City will initiate corrective action and so notify the
affected property owner(s). Such notification will include the
project scope, the estimated cost of the project, and the
estimated cost for the individual property owner(s).
c. The City shall initiate the replacement of sidewalks upon
receipt of the property owner's share of the cost or
assessments having been formally made. In cases where a
hazard exists and the adjacent property owner refuses to
pay the property owner's share of the cost of replacement,
the City may file a lien on the adjacent property O'Nner for the
value of the assessment.
d. The cost of replacing sidewalks will be the property owner's
responsibility.
2. New Sidewalks
a. In developed areas with no existing sidewalks, property
owners can request the installation of sidewalks by
petitioning the City. At a minimum, 80-percent of the
property owners along the block face must sign the petition
requesting the installation of the sidewalks. The 80-percent
will be determined by linear feet of frontage the petitioning
property owner's have to the total feet of frontage the block
has.
b. The cost of installing new sidewalks in developed areas will
be the property owner's responsibility.
c. When the City determines that a sidewalk is warranted to
provide for the safety and convenience of the public-at-Iarge,
no property owner participation will be required. This
determination will be made by the Public Works Department
using a "priority warranting system" which shall include but
may not be limited to such factors as number of pedestrians,
pedestrian accident history, vehicular volume, traffic speed,
and proximity to a school or place of public assembly (see
Attachment "A"). Such warranted sidewalks will be
constructed by the City as needed and shall be paid for 100-
percent by the City from the appropriate fund If funds are not
available from the current budget, the sidewalk construction
cost will be included in the following year's budget.
Page 3 of5
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
Sidewalk Policy
D. City Imorovement Projects
1. When the City remodels, improves or constructs a building (Le., fire
station, police station, garage, civic center), parkway improvements
will normally be a part of the work. These improvements will
consist of the installation of new sidewalks or the replacement of
deteriorated sidewalks adjacent to the property as deemed
necessary and desirable. The cost of this work will be paid for 100-
percent by the City and shall be included as a cost of the building
project.
2. When the City widens or reconstructs an existing street and it is
determined that sidewalks are necessary and desirable, the cost of
these sidewalks shall be paid for by the owners of the adjacent
properties in accordance with the Street Assessment Policy.
3. When the City reconstructs a street utilizinq Community
Development Block Grant funds throuqh HUD. the cost of any
sidewalks constructed will be paid for by the City.
IV. REQUIRED PUBLIC NOTICE
A. Assessments for the construction or replacement of all sidewalks will
require a public meeting as required by Ordinance of the City of North
Richland Hills and applicable State Law.
B. In all sidewalk cases requiring cost participation by the property owner(s),
the City will notify the affected property owner(s) of the project scope,
length, total estimated cost, and the estimated property owner's cost of
participation. Notice will be given of any required meeting, the meeting
date, time, and place, as required by law.
V. PAYMENT
A. The total amount of an assessment may be paid in. a lump sum cash
payment, without interest, if payment is made within 30-days of
acceptance of the project by the City Council.
B. The assessment may be divided into five equal annual payments over a
four-year period with the first payment due within 30-days of acceptance
by the City Council, and with interest not to exceed the maximum
permitted by State law on the unpaid balance.
C. The assessment may be paid in monthly payments of $9.00 or more per
month of a maximum period of 49-months, with the interest rate pre-
computed and made a part of the monthly payment.
Page 4 of 5
____._....__.__~~_______...__A>__~_._._'_'_".._._~._,.._...~,_,_.__...~..~_.."'__.___~m__~·<-·~·_-'-·
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
Sidewalk Policy
D. In those cases where an existing sidewalk constitutes a hazard the
adjacent property owner refuses to pay the property owner's share and
the City Council has determined the necessity for the improvements and
has ordered the improvements, it will be necessary to obtain sealed bids
and let a contract for such work as required by law. One hundred-percent
of the cost as determined from the low bid shall be assessed against the
owners in accordance with applicable statues.
IV. EFFECTIVE DATE
This policy shall become effective upon the date of City Council approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 26th day of June, 2000.
APPROVED:
Charles Scoma, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patricia Hutson, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Page 5 of 5
_m_"...______'__·~___,,····_~__···,~_·~,,·~··,_.._·
ATTACHMENT "A"
PRIORITY WARRANTING SYSTEM
Points
>30 25
Number of pedestrians at peak hour 21 - 30 20
11 - 20 15
1 -10 10
Routes serving schools or pedestrian- 1 - 3 blocks 15
generating facilities 4 - 7 blocks 10
> 7 blocks 5
Street classification Arterial> 48' roadway 20
Collector> 40' roadway 15
Residential < 40' roadway 10
Posted speed limit 40 mph or hiqher 15
35 mph 10
< 30 mph 5
Gaps in sidewalk network o - 50 feet 20
50 - 1 00 feet 15
100 - 200 feet 10
200 - 400 feet 5
> 400 feet 0
Location is a "priority warrant" and qualifies for sidewalk construction by the City with no
property owner participation if points earned are 50 or greater.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning & Inspections Department CounCil Meeting Date: 06/26/00
'_ Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Appeal of McDonald Agenda Number: PZ 2000-22
Associates for a Special Use Permit to Allow a 120 Foot Monopole Communications
Tower with an Equipment Shelter Building on Property Zoned 1-2 Medium Industrial
District. The Property is Located on Lot 3R, Block 7, Industrial Park Addition and
Addressed as 5649 Rufe Snow Drive. Ordinance Number 2486
CASE SUMMARY
McDonald Associates has submitted a special use permit to allow a 120 foot monopole
communications tower for Nextel Communications on property zoned 1-2, Medium
Industrial. The property located 5649 Rufe Snow Drive is partially developed with Harmon
Glass. The applicant is proposing to locate the tower at the rear of the property. The
applicant proposes to lease an area 95' by 44' to be enclosed by an 8 foot high masonry
wall. Initially, the tower will have a maximum height of 100 feet and will be increased to
120 feet in. the future to allow for a total of four sets of antennas mounted on the tower.
The applicant has provided an inventory and map of Nextel's existing towers within the city
and within one mile of the city limits. The nearest tower is approximately 1,700 feet to the
south at 6455 Hilltop Drive. That tower is approximately 75 feet in height and has two sets
of antennas. The separation requirement in Article 7 requires a minimum separation of
1,250 feet.
\
'---
The applicant is proposing a prefabricated equipment building containing 200 square feet
(10 by 20 feet) at 10.4 feet high. The proposed prefabricated equipment building exceeds
the maximum size by 100 square feet. The Board of Adjustment has approved two
variances on the size of the equipment buildings for antennas co-locating on other towers
primarily because the City is encouraging co-location and communication companies are
putting more equipment in each building to provide more services at fewer locations. The
applicant will be submitting a variance request if the City Council approves this request.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~
"
Finance Director
"
Department Head Signature
L:\Cases\PZ Cases\PZ 2000-22
Page 1 of 2
.---. - ....- ..............-------------.---,.--.. ......__.-_._~-- -
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
"- The applicant is proposing to construct a concrete payed entry adjacent to the rear of
Harmon Glass parking lot. The site plan indicates a grayel bed for the equipment area of
four separate users surrounded by an 8 foot masonry wall with a solid line of trees on the
back or west side of the site.
This site is surrounded by Industrial zoning but most of the area is developed as
commercial land uses. While the proposed site is behind existing buildings it is clearly
visible from Industrial Park Boulevard from the west. The solid masonry wall and tree area
would screen the equipment shelters from Industrial Park Boulevard. The 120 foot fall
area does include some existing adjacent buildings and the Industrial Park Boulevard right-
of-way. The applicant has provided information with a map addressing this issue.
North:
South:
East:
West:
Surrounding Zoning
1-2 Medium Industrial
1-2 Medium Industrial
1-2 Medium Industrial
1-2 Medium Industrial
North:
South:
East:
West:
Surrounding Landuses
KFC Chicken
Precision Tune
Harmon Auto Glass
Vacant to Industrial Park
Blvd
Recommendation:
The Planning & Zoning Commission met on Thursday, May 11, 2000 and voted 4-3
"- (Bowen, Nehring, Welch) to recommend denial of PZ 2000..22. The primary concerns
of the P&Z Commission related to opposition from a surrounding property owner
and concerns over the lack of documentation for pursuing co location with an
existing tower that is 1700 feet to the south of this site.
If City Council wishes to approve this request, staff would recommend the following
motion.
Approval of PZ 2000-22 for a specific use permit to construct a 120 foot monopole
communications tower at 5649 Rufe Snow Drive with Ordinance 2486 with the site
plan as presented.
~I
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 2 of 2
Pc> -~. }lfø\'~O
~~~
4¢~~'
\~o\)
:.\1 lltlUJ
'2
( MATCH LINE - SEE Grid: 78-432
¡ \ _ m .
0 < í
w
0 ;!
«
w >-
;! 0
F <
:¡: f
t- V>
71~ u Dlt
VI . I~J
~
w
-'
1-2
'I'
\t'f.
'r'
C) ',f.'
'"
Ih'
W
>
æ
c
~
0
Z
t--\ì\ìc fJ)
W
LL
:J
a:::
\~\ì.
\-ù<-\\ "o~
. \' r' \"
IR,\I:1
~îÃ
TPN;1 ~"
W<\,I!
".;; .
"" .,
'¡-illl Q ii<
Z 1~ .
¡HM~I .'UIl ~ ~,2illl{
"'" U _:d !G
Z "
-- t- < - ..
L2 m, VI U ..
R."I'-¡ W
1 "". ~ ~
flU,'"! .,^ P;'\I\ I
". W~J
,
.,~-I\,,'.I'
13b3
1-2
13b2
-2
"\
'{\\:~
\\ìl'', t"
\\~\' ..è.Xi--
~ì\ì .
ail: ,,~
i!!
III
w
~ 1[WI,'
~ ~ ~ij,:~
I-'~
~-~
~ :m>
""
'^
C-1
R-7-MF
3;)
Ip
1-2
\t\III"
LB
~!,*,
C-2
t
B'\!I·E'r'I~Ø¡S"A'!I'R'ElS.I!)'R
Ca2 "'ti~
13bO
T:i
:¡:
PZ 2000-22
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST
5649 RUFE SNOW DRIVE
....
r- P,AI
-I
o
."
"
'"
)
·1
I
·E"~B1ø'W¡e'RTS'T""'¡¡)"R. .
M~ItIlOI',{C!)l !1!1e'R
C-1
'CO: 2253
ø
I
...
:œ
~
i
C-1
2253
R ,-
,\,\\V,
\ )\)
''\ Þ-\
I' \ì \) \'\
~\\\t\J
1
¡¡;
l.l
0-1
2253
C-2
1850
C-2
"~H
p
C-2
11
f'
LR')
,
S:î!}\\.Ì
N.RTH
RICHLAND
HILLS
( MATCH LINE - SEE Grid' 78-424 Page: 88 )
,.,
11 f)
) F 1:' \1
I',r.¡
r I? 11 P
:',!,
') I{
,~ we,
"
"
"'1
-~\ ') ::.~
DR ~lL
"I ". 1"' I.
q '.'
I ~, ,.' ,
y'¡' "" -
"" 'f; '. f' ^\\t\\'
Q «
OI! t"!1 t-
< 0 OI!
"" «
« ~ « '" p p -'
:( . --8B1{ - z -' ~ [
<
'J -' ~ < ,or> >
< >
0 « '-,n 0
« :¡: t-
~ ""
~ ...
~
'R ..
;'¡'.'
,
, I
C-'
\ " '11~~
I I
~~If@'- ~ ··W'*S--[
I I ~
I
ADOPTED: March 22. 1993
05/19/2000 10:28
97274B""22
LAW OFFICE
PAGE 02
McDonald
..
Associates, PLLC
Writer's Direct Dial:
(972) 745-4303 .
Writer'$ E-Mail:
baldwin@landusetx.com
May 18, 2000
John Pitstick
Development Director
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182
Via facsimile
Re: SUP Request - 5649 Rute Snow
Dear Mr. Pitstick:
Pursuant to our earlier conversation, please let this letter serve as notice of appeal
ofthe Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation atthe May 11th Public Hearing
to deny Nextel Communications' Special Use Permit request tor a 120 foot monopole
communications tower at 5649 Rufe Snow Drive. This letter is written in accordance with
North Richland Hills Zoning Ordinance § 200 (H). Please advise me of the City Council
public hearing date.
Very truly yours,
¿~1:ICP
Land Planner
270 N. Denton rap, SuitetOO .. Cappell, Texas 75019" Phone 972-745-4300 .. Fax 972r745-4222.
06/20/2000 14:13 9727454222
. "Jan,~, 1~~!rl¡:OIPM" wwoNEXTEL NLC 9723238270
Ii
.
~.
. "'J\vr u:.I"..I.
PAGE 02
No,0037 P. 2 ~OOl
valmontV'
MICROFLECT
April 26, 2000
Glenn Bautista
Nextel Communications
2045 Westgate Dr.
Suite 110
Carrol1ton. 'IX 75006
Ph: (972) 323-8252
Fx: (972) 323-8270
Subject;
Failure Modes for Tapered Moaopoles and mounting appurtenances.
Stte~ Nordl Riehla.d Bills, TX044:lB
Proposed 110' CommulcatioD' Monopole Struetare
Dear Mr. Bautista, .
We understand that there is some concern on tho part oflocal building officials regarding
the potential for failure of prDposed 120· tapered monopole Sprint is proposing for the
above site. To address this concern we offer the following:
Communications monopole stnlctlD'eS designed by Va1montlMicroðect are typically sized
in accordance with the latest revision or the EWfIA 222 Standard entitled "Structural
Standards for Steel Antenna Tower& anè Antenna Supporting Structures." This standard
has been approved by. ANSI, who has generated the standard for "Minim.UIn Design
Loads for Bui1dings aDei Other Structures". The standatd. which is the basis for design
loading for practioa11y every building code and standud in the COWltry. has dealt witb. the
desigl\ of antenna suppon structures Cor over 40 yeBIS. The EIA $tandard, based on
provisions or this nationally known specification, has a 1ang histoI)' of reliability. At its
core philosophy is it's first and foremost priority to safeguard and maintain the health and
welfare 'öftbe pub1ie.
The ElA standard dictates minimum wind lOldin, (the predominant loac1ing on a
monopole stx11cturc) for each county in the United States. It is Valmont/Micrcflect's
poliçy to use the wind loading J.i¡ted in the latest EtA standard as a minimum. loadin¡
unless the customer specî1ies a larger value. Statistically, the wind $peed listed in the
EIA standat'd has been determined to be that wí..nd whigh has an average reoc~ce of
SO years (i.e. t.be magnitude haS a 2% çhance of occurring in anyone year)_ This wind is
th~ "futest mile" wind at 33 ft. abovo ground. By definition, the "fastest mile" wind ;5
the aVcnLge velocity of a mile of wind PIUÍDg a fixcd. point This "fastest mite" wind is
customized with height, exposurc, and lUSt factors tbat apply to a particular installation
which. in effect, increases the wind velocity.
Page 1 of3
ComrnUNDOllofti DlwÌJion. Vol,nnl Indus"ie..lnCo JJ'5 25111 Sinter SE Solom, 019gon 97302·1123 USA
'03.363.9261' FoIC $03.363..&613 ww_."ClI,"o lI.~o'"
06/20/2000 14:13 9727454222
Jan. ;¡. I~~O II;UI~M NtXltL NLC ~fZ ~Z3 82/0
,V&\"'&6..L.\ot...
PAGE 03
No.Q037 p. 3 ~uuz
The loads generated by this wind speed, aJong with wei;bt of the monopole sections and
my ìce loading being conlidered, are uaoo to design the structural· system. To fail
monopole sections. tho wind mu.st exceed all or our esthnates for magnitude, duration, as
'Wen as overcome tbe factor of safety dotemùned from the design..
Say for Ï11stance. this monopole is designed for an 90 mph Basic Wind Speed. This Basic
Wind Speed translates into a &WitlÌ11e~ lUSted wind speed of 141 mph at tbe top of the
m.onopole. COXI$ìdering a survivable wind speed which cOnJi4en the ultimate yield
strength of the steel, failure of the monopo1e would not be expected until wind speeds
excccd.ed 157 mph. Beyond 157 mph we can only make an educated guess as to the
failure mechmi5m:i th~t would take place. The term Failure used above only suggests
that "local bucklingn has occun-oc1 at this point. i'Local. Buckling" is the result of a
relatively small ponioD of the shaft c1istorring by "l.dnking" the steel. Local Buckling
does not cause a fi'ee falling pole, rather it relieves the stresses from the pol~ ~t this
location. If wind speeds conti.nue to increase. the pole may continue to buckle and
eventually cromp1clfold over upon itself. Once this takes place, a significant rcd.uction in
wind load will cause the pole not to experience further deformations.
In the above scenerio, we are assuming sustained. gusted winds. As we al11cnow, a gust
would soon dissipa1e and, after this peak wind is gone, the stress in the pole would be
:reduced.. Poles are ßCX1'ble. forgiving structures which ate nol generally susceptible to
damage by impact loads such as a wind gust or earthquake shocks. It may take some time
ror the entire structure 10 "'scc" the impact loading. Even after a local buckle, the pole has
significant capacity, It is this capacity along with the transitory nature of the loading that
prevents a pole from "falling over." It should also be noted that typical antennas are
designed to survive 125 mpb. With the absence of antcnDA loading the pole would have
additiona1 capacity.
ValmontIMicrotlect's Pole desigo. and full-scale testing have provided the public with a
very reliable product. Poles have gone through ex:ttmllive full scale testing, resulting in a
history of being extremely reliable. This pub1ic, in my opinion, has been well served.
ValmoDtlMieroOect bas provided structures that have performed weD dari.ll.g the
earthquakes in CaliJ'orai.. the hurricanes in the South (lAcludiDg Kugot Andrew,
and Opal), and a number of tornadoes. ValmontlMi.croOect has Dever ex,erienced
an in servi~e faUure of. COIDIIIQDication pole due to weather induced overloading,
even though, .. iIa the eases of Hurricane Hugo aDd Hurricane Andrew, the wtud
speeds may have exceeded. the desip wind speed.
VahnoJJ.tlMicrotle<:t has no direot experience with monopole failures. However, from.
what evidence we have seen from other vendor's experiences, I can 5tatc that it ì.s rare for
a monopole to fall in a r.uii.us larger than, say, halt it's height, III1d that in most easl:S it
win collapse in a small confined. area as it comes down upon itself.
Page 2 of3
06/20/2000 14:13. g?27~?42X2ItL NLC 972 323 8270
v:III, ,J, I ~ ~ 0 I I . u aM NI: L.
PAGE 04
~l<U t"J..t (;1'
No·0037 P.4
141003
ValmontlMicroflect's communication towers have proven,to be vetÿ' reliable prod'Ucts. In
our over 40 years of engineering and fabricating thouslDds of towers and monopoles. we
have not had one struçtare fail due to overloadin¡ (even in the CX~mc cases that wind
speeds have exceeded design values). We USe the latest standards~ wind speed
information. and sophistioated analytical too1s to 'ensure that we maintain our
Wlblen:U!ilhed record for quality.
As. requested. Valmont'IMicrotlect certifies that in the unlikeLy event the pole were to fail.
it would faU within a radius Dot exceeding the height of the pole.
r trust this letter satisfies your requests. If you have additional questions or comrnent£.. I
may be roached. at (503) 315-4515.
Sincerely, ~ _ n _
~~
Adrian McJUDk.in, P.B.
Communications Division,
Pole Engineering Team Leader
, .
,.' .. .......:~::,~. ..... '.
-....I.~-
,. 0.. :.... ..
...~. ...-...-.......-..---
.. - ---...........
.~. :, ':-.~';.'. ,
. ..... ".- -.. .....__...__.~
. "
~!~:!
Page 3 of3
McDonald
..
Associates, PLLC
Writer's Direct Dial:
(972) 745-4303
Writer's E-Mail:
baldwin@landusetx.com
June 16, 2000
The Honorable Charles Scoma
Mayor
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182
Re: SUP Request - 5649 Rufe Snow
Dear Mayor Scoma:
This firm represents Nextel Communications in their efforts to construct a wireless
telecommunications network in the Dallas - Fort Worth Metroplex. In an effort to complete
their wireless network, Nextel needs antennas in the vicinity of Rufe Snow Drive and
Industrial Park Drive. We have filed a request for a Specific Use Permit ("SUP") to allow for
a 120-foot tall monopole tower and equipment building at 5649 Rufe Snow Drive. This
request is known as case PZ 2000-22 and will be considered at your June 26, 2000 meeting.
The property selected for this facility is zoned 1-2 and is currently improved with an
automotive glass shop. We believe that with the land uses and the zoning in the area, this
is an appropriate location for a wireless communication tower.
As you can see from the attached site plan, Nextel would like permission to construct
a 120-foot tall monopole tower and the necessary equipment shelter. As demonstrated on
the site plan, this tower is designed to accommodate at least four (4) sets of wireless
telecommunication antennas and a couple of microwave dishes. Nextel has leased enough
ground area to accommodate the equipment necessary for these other service providers.
Nextel proposes to locate their antennas at the 100-foot level on this tower. We are
requesting 120-feet at this time is to ease the approval process for other service providers
in the future. Nextel is in active negotiations with several wireless telecommunication service
providers at this time in an effort to have this facility as a collocation facility prior to the
commencement of construction.
The nearest monopole tower is approximately 1,700 feet to the south, which is located
outside of the geographic area that meets Nextel's engineering requirements. This tower
is approximately 65-feet in height and currently has two (2) sets of antennas. This tower
does not offer Nextel the height necessary to provide the required level of service to their
customers as required by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. In addition, due to the very
limited land area at this site, this tower is not a candidate for a "drop and swap" where one
tower is replaced with a taller tower. This tower is located at a day care center and the
270 N. Denton Tap, Suite100 .. Cappell, Texas 75019 .. Phone 972-745-4300 .. Fax 972-745-4222
Mayor Scoma
June 16, 2000
Page 2
switching equipment is located inside the building. There is no room in the building or on the
property hosting the tower to accommodate new service providers at this site.
Nextel's equipment requires a shelter that is 10' x 20' and 10.4 feet in height. The
size of Nextel's equipment shelter is mandated by the equipment needed to operate Nextel's
type of wireless telecommunications service. This shelter size is approximately 80 square
feet smaller than the size of AT&T's equipment shelters and about the same size as
Southwestern Bell's shelters.
Please rest assured that this site was not selected arbitrarily. The need for new
antennas is generally determined by subscribers who complain that they are having trouble
placing calls or having calls dropped in a particular area. Radio frequency engineers then
perform computerized calculations to determine where new antennas are needed in order
to cover.. the area where customers are having difficulties. It is important that the new
antennas are located in a geographic area that will allow them to communicate with the other
antennas in Nextel's network. The computer program takes these factors into account and
issues a "search ring" which shows on a map where the site has to be located in order to
meet the locational criteria. A copy of the search ring for this site is attached to this letter.
As you can see, the proposed tower is located in the search ring.
Once the search rings are issued, I work with Nextel's property specialists to find a
suitable location for the antennas. Nextel always tries to locate their antennas on existing
structures whenever possible. When there are no structures available, Nextel has a policy
of building towers that are designed to accommodate several sets of wireless antennas and
they lease enough area for the needed equipment as well. If a new tower is required, we
strive to locate it in either a heavy commercial or industrial area and as far away from
residential structures as possible. In this case, we are located in an industrial zoning district
and we are separated from the nearest residential area by a line of tall TXU electrical
transmission lines. These towers appear to be the approximate height of the tower we are
proposing for this site.
Thank you for your assistance with this matter. I will be pleased to speak or meet with
you at your convenience to discuss this request in greater detail. Please let me know if I can
provide you with any additional information to assist you in your evaluation of this request.
Very truly yours,
~1B~
Land Planner
\ I',.
'..
.~'\
'.~ ~~,
,¡, ·...b
:."
\_.""'<;;~ .-'J
.. ""..
I..
Search Ring Legend
Dë:ši~jg~,ramet'èis
-- -- '~........._~
Site Name N. Richland Hills Latitude 32-51-08 N
Site Number TX0442 Longitude 97-14-29 W
Market Dallas Ground Elevation 634ft.
County Tarrant Radiation Center 100 ft.
Vp.rsion 1 Map Scale/Name 1 :24K/Hurst
.Le 11/19/99 Engineer Chris Makris
Coverage Objectives: 1) Capacity off load for Site TX0111 Watauga. Provide In-Car
Portable (ICP) coverage along US 377 and 820.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE
CITY COUNCIL
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS
PZ 2000-22 - MCDONALD ASSOCIATES
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the City Council will conduct a public
hearing on Monday evening June 26,2000, at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers,
7301 Northeast Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas, to consider the request of
McDonald Associates for a Special Use Permit to allow a 120' Communications Tower with
Equipment Shelter on Lot 3R, Block 7, Industrial Park Addition. The property is zoned 12
Industriarand is lacated at 5649 Ruge Snow Drive.
All interested parties will be given an opportunity to appear and express their views.
Please contact the Planning Department concerning any questions, at 7301 Northeast
Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76180, (817) 427-6300.
M:\News Notices\CC News Notice\CCNN 6-26-00.doc
2
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL
CASE #: PZ 2000-22
MCDONALD ASSOCIATES
Because you are a property owner within 200 feet of the subject tract of land as shown by
the last City-approved tax rolls, you received this notice. If you cannot or do not wish to
attend the hearing, the attached form is provided for your convenience.
Purpose of Reauest:
The public' hearing is to consider the request of McDonald Associates for a Special Use Permit to
allow a 120' Communications Tower with Equipment Shelter on Lot 3R, Block 7, Industrial Park
Addition. The property is zoned 12-lndustrial and is located at 5649 Rufe Snow Drive.
Hearing Procedure:
Time:
MONDAY, JUNE 26, 2000
7:30 P.M.
When:
What:
PUBLIC HEARING - CITY COUNCIL
Location:
PUBLIC HEARING - CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7301 N. E. LOOP 820
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Staff Presentation
Applicant and Other Speakers' Presentation
Public Input, Neighborhood Associations, Property Owners Within 200 feet, Interested Citizenry
Questions from Planning and Zoning Commission for Applicants, City Staff and Guests Present.
M:\Property Owner Notification\PZ\PZ 2000-22 -MCDONALD ASSOCIATES.doc
Case #: PZ 2000-22
MCDONALD ASSOCIATES
The following property owners are listed in the 1999 Tarrant Appraisal District tax rolls. They
fall within 200 feet of the subject tract and have been notified.
5636 Rufe Snow Drive
Holiday West Addition
Block 35 Lot 3
Industrial Park Blvd.
Industrial Park Addition
Block 7, Lot lRl
5651 Rufe Snow Drive
Industrial park Addition
Block 7, Lot 2R
5649 Rufe Snow Drive
Industrial Park Addition
Block 7, Lot 3Rl
5647 Rufe Snow Drive
Industrial Park Addition
Block 7, Lot 3R2
5643 Rufe Snow Drive
Industrial Park Addition
Block 7, Lot 4
5631 Rufe Snow Drive
Industrial Park Addition
Block 7, Lot 4
6646 Industrial Park Blvd
Industrial Park Addition
Block 5, Lot lR
5749 Rufe Snow Drive
Industrial Park Addition
Block 5, Lot 4R
Mountainprize Inc.
PO Box 105035
Atlanta, GA 30348
Irving M Groves
5008 Victor Street
Dallas, TX 75214
Kentucky Fried Chicken
PO Box 970
Wichita, KS 67201
HSM/G&E Realty Income Fund
1100 Providence Towers W
4903 Cape Coral Drive
Dallas, TX 75287
Irving M Groves III
4809 Cole Avenue #LB 123
Dallas, TX 75205
Stephen J. Appleton
Attn: John S Appleton Custodian
6801 Snider Plaza Suite 220
Dallas, TX 75205
Rader Partners
PO Box 612868
Dallas, TX 75261
Harlingen Investors 11
6646 Industrial Park
North Richland Hills, TX 76180
Rufe Snow N*(Retumed Letter - Not Deliverable)
PO Box 17047
Fort Worth, TX 76102
M:\Property Owner Notification\PZ\PZ 2000-22 -MCDONALD ASSOCIA TES.doc
6625 Industrial Park Blvd
Industrial Park Addition
Block 2, Lot 1
5700 Rufe Snow Drive
NRH Industrial Park Addition
Lot 3A
5710 Rufe Snow Drive
NRH Industrial Park Addition
Lot 3B
5750 Rufe Snow Drive
NRH Industrial Park Addition
Lot 1 & 2A
Tecnol Orthopedic Pro Inc.
7201 Industrial Park Blvd
Fort Worth, TX 76180
Texas Tierra III L TD
330 N. A Street Suite 220
Midland, TX 79705
Texas Tierra I, L TD
Artn: Janis Baucom
5030 E University Blvd. #106
Odessa, TX 79762
Sherrill Carlson
507 Woodland Trail
Keller, TX 76248
M:\Property Owner Notification\PZ\PZ 2000-22 -MCDONALD ASSOCIA TES.doc
NRH
APPLICATION FOR A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
City of North Rlchland Hills
7301 NE Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas
817-581-5500
(PI_ pnnt or type aU raspon_)
PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
ame of applicant / agent"
McDonald Associates
Sueetaddressofapplicant/agent
270 NIl. Denton Tap #100
City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent Te/ephonenumberofapp/~nt/agent
Cop pel I , TX 75019 972/745-4303
PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name of property owner: .
Leaf River Development Corp
Street address of property owner:
p 0 Box 2043
City / State / Zip Code of property owner: Telephone number of property owner:
Vernon, TX 76385 940/552-9999
Note: Attach letter or affidavIt from property owner If different from applicant / agent:
Surveyor map attached as required by application: Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner: :
- , i xi Yes ¡: I
--X....: Yes No No
-
PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Current zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: I
"":-2 Communications tower and equipment shelter
~< < ...cnbe the nature of the proposed activity and any particular characteristics related to the use of the property:
Nextel would like to construct a 120-foot tall monopole tower and necessary
equipment shelter in order to provide wireless communication services to their
customeiES in North Richland Hills.
Attach site plan which conforms with requirements Included in this packet Attach affidavit from property owner if applicant is not owner:
- :-¡ No . XI Yes -
x: Yes . - UNO
- . I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the property
03/27/00 described above and do hereby submit this request for approval of a
Date: Special us.~. ","nnm. ond ZMm. Com_ for "",,,,,,",,,,,,
Pnnt NameRobert Baldwin Signature: ~ ~ ~ -
//
PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY r
Date of Planning & Zomng CommIssion Public Heanng: Taxes Paid? C7~
il Yes : I No co- ;;;;J2
'---'
Date of City Council Public Heanng: Liens Paid? Fee: Y~O§Ç
! ¡ Yes ¡ ! No
Special Use Permit Approved: Assessments Paid? $3&8.98
- - r- : No pQ: J
Yes No . ! Yes ;
- - L--..;
Conditions of Approval: This application will not be
scheduled for public hearing
until application fee is received.
Special Use Permit
CD - 414 (2196)
6.
PZ 2000-22
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF MCDONALD ASSOCIATES FOR A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A 120 FOOT MONOPOLE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER
WITH AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER BUILDING ON PROPERTY ZONED 1-2 MEDIUM
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON LOT 3R, BLOCK 7, INDUSTRIAL
PARK ADDITION AND ADDRESSED AS 5649 RUFE SNOW DRIVE.
Mr. Rob Baldwin of McDonald Associates has submitted a special use permit to allow a
120 foot monopole communications tower for Nextel Communications on property zoned
1-2, Medium Industrial. The property located 5649 Rufe Snow Drive is partially
developed with Harmon Glass. The applicant is proposing to locate the tower at the rear
of the property. The applicant proposes to lease an area 95' by 44' to be enclosed by an
a-foot high masonry wall. Initially, the tower will have a maximum height of 100 feet and
will be increased to 120 feet in the future to allow for two antennas above and below the
Nextel" antennas. Concerns were expressed over the lack of documentation that the
other owners of neighboring towers would not share usage with Nextel Commutations.
Steven Kelley (Contruction Engineer for Nextel) also spoke.
Mr. Groves, neighboring property owner spoke against building the tower because the
resale value it would have on his property.
The Chair entertained a motion. Mr. Nehring moved for approval. Mr. Welch seconded.
The motion did not pass. Those voting in favor of the request were Chairman Bowen, Mr.
Nehring, and Mr. Welch. Those voting in opposition were, Mr. Lueck, Mr. Davis, Mr. Blue,
and Mr. Laubacher.
P & Z Minutes
May 11, 2000
ORDINANCE NO. 2486
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO AUTHORIZE A SPECIAL
USE PERMIT FOR A TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN A 1-2
INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a
recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by
changing said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, in case number PZ 2000-22, a Special Use Permit be hereby authorized for a
telecommunications tower on property platted as Lot 3R, Block 7, Industrial Park
Addition in a district zoned "12" Industrial.
2.
THAT, development of this property shall be consistent with the site plan attached as
Exhibit "A."
3.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City
Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance
are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this
ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not
affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this
ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section.
Ordinance No, 2486
Page 1 of 2
4.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Zoning Ordinance of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save
and except as amended by this Ordinance.
5.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 26th DAY OF JUNE, 2000.
Charles Scoma, Mayor
City of North Rich/and Hills, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Department Head
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
Ordinance No. 2486
Page 2 of 2
;.
,. '.._._.'.- '.'- .._~...._.__. ..., ---.. '--'-- ~- .,.,.__._~_.__ ___~ .H..._. .~'.,..' .
CITY OF
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
DeDartment: Plannina & Inspections Department
Council Meeting Date: 06/26/00
Subject: Public Hearina to Consider the Reauest of Shady Grove Agenda Number: PZ 2000-25
Baptist Church (Vernon and Evelyn Jackson), represented by Innovative Construction, for
a Zoning Change at 6649 Precinct Line Rd. (being Tract 3C1 and 3C2 out of the Tandy
K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055), from AG Agricultural to R2 Single Family Residential.
Ordinance Number 2487
CASE SUMMARY
The Shady Grove Baptist Church (Vernon and Evelyn Jackson) have authorized
Innovative Construction to request this rezoning of the property in question. This request
is to rezone 4.60 acres of land from AG Agricultural to R2 Single Family Residential for the
development of a Church facility on the property. The property is located at 6649 Precinct
Line Rd. and is just South of Glenhaven Court (directly across from Springhill Road in
Hurst). . .-'
"-
Currently, Mr. and Mrs. Jackson use the property as their home. The Shady Grove Baptist
Church is considering purchase of the property for future use as a church. However they
are awaiting the approval of the rezoning before they purchase the lot. If approved, the
Church would then submit a preliminary plat and a final plat before it is developed.
One reason for the request to R2 Single Family Residential rather than a U Schools,
Churches and Institutional District zoning is that the masonry requirements are different.
In the R2 district, the masonry requirement is 75 %; in the U it is 100%. However, recent
changes in the Landscaping regulations will require the church facility to meet the same
landscaping standards as other commercial facilities.
If this request is approved for the basic zoning to R2 Single Family, the Shady Grove
Baptist Church will also be required to get site plan approval because they are considered
a business within 200 feet of residential property.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget _ '\
Other qJ
-.-Joe~
Department Head Signature
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
'--
Finance Director
....
L:\Cases\PZ Cases\Cover Sheet CC.doc
Page 1 of 1
,
',--
'-I
.:- A '
.-.-..-.--------.........-
- -<--._-""...._.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Surrounding Future Land Uses
The request for R2 is in conformance with the projected land uses outlined in the current
Comprehensive Plan, however the recent update projects office uses for the tract in
question.
North:
South:
East:
West:
Future Land Use
Low Density Residential
Commercial
City of Hurst
Low Density Residential
This rezoning request is in conformance with the current Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
RECOMMENDA TION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission met on Thursday, June 8,2000 and voted 5-0
to recommend approval of PZ 2000-25.
.. .. ., - .~
If City Council wishes to approve this request, staff would recommend the following
motion.
Approval of PZ 2000-25 from Agricultural to R2 Single Family and Ordinance 2487
with the understanding that if a church locates on this property a site plan would
have to be approved by City Council prior to building construction.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Document6
Page 2 of 2
l-f····.·.···.·..·.·.·.····.·.:.-................................
.-" : _.-....
. . '" . .
.. '. ... .14':.
34·
311
3f
· . . . . . . . . ~ . . . .
· . . . . . .' .
.' . .' . .
0' . . . " . . .
.-. . -. . . . . .
.-" . . . . . ..
· . . . . . . . .
..,. . . .. . . ..
· . . o' .. . . . .
.-... . . . . . .
· ~ . . . . . . .
· .. . . W·_' . .
O' . . . . . . . .
· ". . .. . . .
'"
7·
. . . . . . . . .
· . . . . . . .
R
· .-. . .. . . .
· . . . . . - . .
· . " . .. . . .
.. . . . . . . . .
· . . . . . . .
.. . . .. . . . . .
· . . . . . . .
· . . . . . . . .
· . . . . . . .
· . . . . . . . .
· . . . . . . .
.' . " . . . . . .
'- . . . .. . . .
· . , .. .' . . . .
· 0- . . 0" . . .
· . . . . ,-. . .
· . . . . . . ,- .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . .',. . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .
~ ! : ¡ ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; .;: ) ~ ~ t> >; \ ~ ; :~ : ~.:. >: :-
1R.AE
11
C-1
¡
~ii
~
.Ii
IIC
'@
~
'IIU
5
a
~
g;
rr
.0,
..~
'~'
>
1:1
12
lRAO·
NRH
PZ 2000-25 Zoning Request
Shown with 200 ft buffer around Tracts 3C1 & 3C2
Prepared for: Pllnling & Zoning
Prepared by: Infam8tIon Services - GIS DIv.
GIS Job No: 0169 AV: PZ 2000-25 May 24,2000
200
I
o
200 Feet
I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas will conduct a public hearing on Monday, June 26,2000 at 7:00 P.M.
in the City Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas, to
consider the following request:
PZ 2000·25 - SHADY GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH
Public hearing to consider the request of Shady Grove Baptist Church (Vernon and Evelyn
Jackson), represented by Innovative Construction, for a Zoning Change at 6649 Precinct
Line Rd. (being Tract 3C1 and 3C2 out of the Tandy K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055), from
AG Agricultural to R2 Single Family Residential.
All interested parties will be given an opportunity to appear and be heard and express their
views. Please contact the Planning Department concerning any questions, at 7301
Northeast Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76180, (817) 427-6300.
L:\News Notices\PZ News Notice\PZNN 06-26-00.doc 2
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL
CASE #: PZ 2000-25
Shady Grove Baptist Church
(Vernon & Evelyn Jackson)
6649 Precinct Line Rd.
Rezoning from AG Agricultural to R2 Single Family Residential
Because you are a property owner within 200 feet of the subject tract of land as shown
by the last City-approved tax rolls, you received this notice. You are invited to attend the
Public Hearing to voice your support or opposition to the request.
If you are unable to come to the meeting, you may forward any petitions or letters to:
Planning Department
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Purpose of Reauest:
PZ 2000-25 Public hearing to consider the request of the Shady Grove Baptist Church
(Vernon and Evelyn Jackson), represented by Innovative Construction, for a
Zoning Change at 6649 Precinct Line Rd. (being Tract 3C1 and 3C2 out of the
Tandy K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055), from AG Agricultural to R2 Single
Family Residential.
Hearina Procedure:
When:
MONDAY, JUNE 26, 2000
7:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING - CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING - CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7301 N. E. LOOP 820
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Time:
What:
Location:
Staff Presentation
Applicant and Other Speakers' Presentation
Public Input, Neighborhood Associations, Property Owners Within 200 feet, Interested Citizenry
Questions from City Council for Applicants, City Staff and Guests Present.
L:\P&V.Cases\2000\Pz2000-25Exp.doc
~ ." ---- '"'~"'-~."'.,---""<--~"--'--~----
CASE #: PZ 2000-25
6649 Precinct line Rd Vernon and Evelyn Jackson
The following property owners are listed in the 1999 Tarrant Appraisal District tax rolls.
They fall with in 200 feet of the subject tract and have been notified.
American Equities Fin Corp
600 E Carpenter Fwy Ste 301
Irving, TX 75062-3966
Hirrlinger, Jack
9212 Glenhaven
Ft. Worth, TX 76180
NRH Precinct Line JV
841 Chaparral Ct
Bedford, TX 76022
Macdonald, Winona
9216 Glenhaven
Ft Worth, TX 76180
Region, Earl D and Oleta Lucille
7200 Evergreen Rd
Fort Worth, TX 76118-5131
Echeverria, Teri
9220 Glenhaven
Ft Worth, TX 76180
Summer Homes Inc
2404 Texas Dr Ste 103
Irving TX 75062-7011
Welling, James
9224 Glenhaven
Ft Worth, TX 76180
Mccutcheon, Kay L
9225 Glenhaven Ct
Fort Worth TX 75062-7011
Bhatti, Mohammed
9228 Glenhaven
Ft. Worth, TX 76180
Allred, Ronnie
9209 Glenhaven Ct
Fort Worth TX 76180-4365
Jackson, Vernon
6649 Precint Line
Ft Worth, TX 76180
H Mitchell Enterprises
9224 Glenhaven Dr
Fort Worth TX 76180-4365
Treats Investment
604 E 4th St 200
Ft Worth, TX 76102
Edwards, William
9209 Glenhaven Ct
Fort Worth, TX 76180-4365
Merkle, Charles
844 Edgehill
Hurst, TX 76053
Younkin, John Eric
9201 Glenhaven Ct
Ft Worth, TX 76180
Nielson, Henry
9037 Valleyview Dr
Fort Worth, TX 76180
Kolban, Neil and Stephanie
9200 Glenahven Ct
Ft Worth, TX 76180
Edmonds, Jack
9208 Glenhaven
Ft Worth, TX 76180
Corso, Lawrence
9204 Glenhaven Ct
Ft. Worth, TX 76180
/"
NRH
(PIeue print or type.ø FUpOrwa)
o APPLICATION FOR A CJ
ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE
City of North Richland Hills
7301 NE Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas
817-581-5500
PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of applicant / agent:
I t.J~oV~ T IVIii: ~alokJ
StntetaddntssofappHcant/agent
2904- OAk RIDGE t:::i?IUE
City / State / Zip Code of appHcant / agent Telephone number of applicant / agent
FLcwëR r1100kJD , 1ëXA'S ïS.O"Z.:7.. (~72. \ S Z'3 - 4.1 "Z. "3
PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION
Stntet addntss at location whent zoning district change is being ntquested:
~~4q PREc.llú c.. T Lt,UE RoA I::) . NORTH 1( Lr{ Ll\U b UILL5 , TEXAS 7~ 18ð
Legal Description of Property whent zoning district change is being ntquested:
-SEE ~c..HED LEG~L bËSCRIPT'lòU
Current zoning classification: Proposed zoning classification: ProPOSed use of the property:
AG (AGRIC,uLTURRL \ R2. (~lfJGLE FA1rJIL'r') 10 'BE Œ\I£LoPE.Q AS A ŒlJRc. H C2:KJf)¡LJ J rt"(
CSHAt:ù' GROJE BRpíl'Sí cHURe..H \
Reason for zoning district change:
C HLJ R<:::'~"'S. ~O,.' AtJ..l)\usl::l UJ...JœR. ~G 'lON l.u~ - "'Sð PRoPERT'f" To Be HE ~JJeD 10 R2Ta
ALlAIN FoR. Cl:us.TRuc::.:nbU OF' R NE\U SrlADY LSRZiJE. BAPTI~'" ~HlJR~ F1Jð Llï"f .
Surveyor map attached as ntquired by appHcation: ~ attached from property owner if applicant is not owner:
L.E'I'tER.:
~ Ves [JNO !Xl Ves 0 No
"'JART 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
.......me of property owner:
VEF-kIbù )oJ. ~ ëV£L. Yt..JP,:! Rc.k:CSo I\.l
Street address of property owner:
G;~ 4-~ Pl<t C.1Nc..T U t..JE RaF\D
City / State / Zip Code of property owner: Te~Phonenumberofpropertyowner:
NORTH ~kHLA~D HILL -:, , TEXRS ì¿.18 è (811) '581 -~1Ql
Note: Attach letter or affidavit from property owner if diffentnt from applicant / agent: OS eë. Rrr ß::.Weo L.1!'I'TE1Z..
I hentby certify that I am, or ntpntsent, the legal owner of the property
~/r~ described above and do hentby submit this request for approval of a
Date: Z"7;'~o~=kxcon~-
Print Name: ~~'e:RT ~0\<S1 k.. ~aW . .~. '<
1.:.-
PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date of Planning & Zoning Commission Public Heanng: Taxes Paid? Case Number:
DVes DNO
Date of City Council Public Hearing: Fee:
Dves DNO
Zoning District Change Approved: $300.00
DVes' DNO o Ves DNO
( lions of Approval: This application will not be
-
scheduled for public hearing
until application fee is received.
Zoning District Change
CD - 407 (2197)
h_--ß1_7.'f:-=-....
o
o
PZ-2000-25
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF VERNON AND
EVEYLN JACKSON, REPRESENTED BY IINNOV A TIVE CONSTRUCTION,
FOR A ZONING CHANGE AT 6649 PRECINCT LINE RD. (BEING TRACT 3C1
AND 3C2 OUT OF THE TANDY K. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1055),
FROM AG AGRICULTURAL TO R2 SINGLE FAMilY RESIDENTIAL.
APPROVED
Mr. Robert Remsik of Innovative Construction came forward and addressed the
commission. Mr. Remsik explained that the owner was seeking the R2 zoning
designation for future construction of a church on the property. It was his
understanding that the Master Plan called for a low-density residential zoning at
the site. Mr. Remsik discussed the request for the R2 zoning over the U
Schools, Churches, and Institutional zoning district.
Ms. Barbara Brown of the Shady Grove Baptist Church came forward and
address'èd the Commission's concern about the operation of a Day Care at the
location. The Commission explained that the R2 zoning would not allow the day
care. Ms. Brown explained that the operation of a day care was not planned at
this time.
The landscaping and screening of the tract was discussed. There were no other
speakers for or against the request. The Chair closed the public hearing and
entertained a motion. Mr. Davis moved for approval of the request with the
understanding that site plan review by the Commission and Council will be
required before any permits are issued. A site plan is required because the
property falls within 200 feet of residential property. Mr. Laubacher seconded.
The motion passed unanimously (5-0).
5.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
There were none.
6.
ADJOURNMENT
Having no additional business to conduct, the meeting adjourned at 7:24 p.m.
Page 2 6/8/2000
P & Z Minutes
ORDINANCE NO. 2487
AN ORDINANCE REZONING TRACT 3C1 and 3C2 TANDY K. MARTIN
SURVEY ABSTRACT 1055, FROM AG AGRICULTURAL TO R2
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2
,
SECTION 200, OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING
ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a change in zoning district boundaries;
and
WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a
recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Zoning Ordinance and the
Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THA T, in Case Number PZ 2000-25, the following described tract as shown on Exhibit
"An shall be rezoned:
A tract of land known as Tracts 3C1 and 3C2 out of the Tandy K. Martin Survey
Abstract 1055, Tarrant County, Texas, is hereby changed from AG-Agricultural to
R2- Single Family Residential.
2.
THA T, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary
amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property
described herein.
3.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City
Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance
are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this
ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not
affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this
ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section.
Ordinance 2487
Page I of2
- -_.~~--_._-- ^'---._.. -----~"--~_._."'-._-'.'- .---.-------..
4.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 26 DAY OF JUNE 2000.
Mayor Charles Scoma
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Development Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
Ordinance - 2487
Page 2 of2
_._"__O,~~_.~~..____....
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
WHEREAS VERNON AND £VEL YN P. JACKSON are the sole . 'owners of that certain
tract or parcel of land containing 4.60 aëres situated in the T.K. Martin Survey,
Abstract No. 1055 of Tarrant County, Texas. same being all of that 4.60 acres
tract of land conveyed to Vernon and Evelyn P. Jackson by deed recorded in
Volume 11586, Page 711, Deed Record Tarrant County, Texas, and being more
particular! y described as follows:
BEGINNING at a 1/2 inch iron rod found at the Southeast corner of Nab Hill
Addition for the Southwest corner of this 4.60 acres being described;
-. ~
TI-iENCE N 00 deg. 04 min. 19 sec. E, with the East line at Nob Hill Addition, a
distance of 315.41 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set at a corner of the said Nab
Hill Adélitiòn and the Southwest corner of the Southridge Estates Addition for
the Northwest corner of this 4.60 acres being described:
TI-iENCE n 89 deg. 4.2 min. 24 sec. E, with the South line of Southridge
Estates Addition, a distance of 539.66 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set in the
West line of Precinc: line R'Jad located at the Southeast corner of Southridge
Estates Addition for the Northeast corner of this 4./30 acres being decsribed;
THENCE S 01 deg. 05 min. 44 sec. W, with the west line of Precinct Line R:::>ad,
a distance of 143.83 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set for a corner of this 4.60
acres being described:
THENCE S 02 deg. 59 min. 59 sec. W, with the West line of Precinct Line
R:::>ad, 'J distance of 171.98 feet to J 1/2 inch iron rod set at the Northeast
corner of Nab Hill Centr:!' ,~ddition for the Southeast corner of this 4.60 acre
being described:
THENCE S 89 deg. 42 min. 51 sec. W, with the North line of Nob Hill Centre'
Addition passing a 5/8 inch iron rod found on line at a distance of 200.01
feet. continuing with said line pass (mother 5/8 inch iron rod found on line at
J distance of 360.47 feet and continuing a total distance of 628.30 feet to
the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing within these metes and bounds
200,397 square feet or 4.60 acres I:>f land.
Information & Reports June 26, 2000
1. Announcements
Tuesday, July 4 - Independence Day
~ City Offices Closed
~ Garbage will be collected
Tuesday, July 4
~ Northeast Family Fourth, Tarrant County College
6:00 p.m. - 9:45 p.m.
2. Information
June 30
Djve-In Movie, NRH20
9:00 p.m.
July 3
Parks and Recreatjon Board Meeting
6:00 p.m.
July 3
Camp NRH, Session 6
July 7
Dive In Movie, NRH20
9:00 p.m.
July 8
Crjtter Connection Open, North Hills Mall
July 13
Planning and Zoning Commission
6:00 p.m.
July 14
Dive-In Movie, NRH20
9:00 p.m.
Page 1 of 1
·
·
·
·
~'.
·
·
n ·
·
~. ·
q ·
r./l ·
·
e 0
·
~ ~ ·
z ~ Z ·
(t) (t) ·
~ ~ 0 ·
f'"""t-
(t) ~ ~ ·
~ (t) ~ ·
0 r.n ~ ·
f'"""t-
~ ~ ~ ~.
~ N ".
(t) ~. ·
~ tv (J ·
~ 0 ~ ·
r.n 0 ~ ·
0 ~ ·
I
tv t:j ·
tv ~ ·
·
~ ·
·
~. ·
~
~ ·
rJJ ·
·
·
~.
, .
·
·
·
·
.
.
.
rJJ.f""""t'-~~
::TON~
~ ~ ?.c
(tJ ~ ~ =
~ ~ 0 ~
~~~~
~
Oo..f""""t'-··
t'\"\ ~ rJl
~ ~ ~~
~~sg
~ 0 0 ~.
(,)OO~~
f""""t'-~ 0 ~
~. ~ ~ y
~ ~ 0 rJJ.
::r' ~ (D (D
(tJ ~
~. ~ (J (D
(JQ 0 0 ~
~f""""t'-a~
"-/ (tJ a ;:+.
"S. § õ
~ o· ~
a ~ õ
(tJ ~..¿
~ § <:
rJJ. ~
~
o
~
=
~
-.
o
=
n
=
~
~
f'þ
=
~
~
Q
=
-.
=
~
. .
U.
0\
~
\0
8'
~
rJl
~
o
~
tj
~
~.
-<
(tJ
. .
~
I
N
~
(tJ
0..
~.
~
a
~
~
g.
rJJ.
f""""t'-
~
~.
~
~
~
~
(J
~
00
..
..
..
..
C'..
..
..
...
..
...
..
..
...
..
...
till
...
..
...
..
..
~.
., ..
..
..
..
..
..
·
..
·
..
·
..
..
·
..
..
~.
\ .
·
·
·
..
..
..
..
..
i'''
. . . ..
..
~ 0 N ~ ~ ·
~ 0 =- =- ·
~ =- ::1 tÞ tÞ ..
~ tÞ (D ..
~ 00 ~
(D -t ·
rl- ~ = -t
~ ~ I -t Q tr1 ..
~. N
~ = -t ~ ..
= Q tÞ ~ ..
Q. = -t ~. ..
~ = ~ r:n ..
Q. ~ ..
. .
rIl ..... ~.
tÞ = rJl = ·
..
rIl (JQ ~ ( Q
..... ~ ~ ·
= (D r ~.
-t
~ 0 '.
=- Q ~ ~ ..
~
tÞ ~ = ..
tÞ
> -t ~ ~ ·
~ 0 ·
-t .....
tÞ tÞ a e ·
= rIl ·
. . 0 r:n
. . ·
< r:::r (t)
~ ·
::1 ~.
~ ~ r:n ·
~ n (D
g (fQ ·
00 ~ ·
rl- ~ ..
~
~. ~ 00 ·
~ 00
~ ::1 ..
~ ..
~.
\, .
..
·
..
c.
·
·
·
·
i'.
. . . . ·
. ·
s ~ ~ PJ Z ~ ~ N > ..
(D
~ ~. (J CD PJ ~ 0 ·
PJ CD ~ (J ~ 00 CD 0 ~ ·
00 (D 0 rl- N ..
0 rl- rl- 00
CD ~ S CD 0
::s CD ~ 0 ~ tJ ·
~ ~ I
~ 00 S ~ · ~ ·
00 ~ E; ~
~. CD CD ·
~ 00 0 PJ 0
~ CD ~ · ·
CD 0.. 00 ~ rl- ~
~ ~. CD ~
PJ (J ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ rl- ·
0 -< CD ~ PJ I--' ·
~ CD ~ ..
~ ~. PJ 0.. ~ ~
S (J 00 0 CD ~. ~ 00 ·
CD rl- rl- ~
~ ~ CD ~ 00 S ·
0 ~ CD 0.. CD ~. S 0 ·
(fQ 0
§ ~ CD CD ~ ::s (D ::s ~ ..
0 ~
-< ~ ::s 00 CD 0 ~ ~.
0.. ~ 0 CD 0.. ~ ~ ·
~. ~ rl- 00
~ 0.. ~. 00 rl- ~ 0 CD ..
CD~ (fQ 0 0 ~ ..
~. ~ S ~ CD CD
~ Hj PJ ~ ~ ·
~ 00 CD rl- rl-
rJ ~ (fQ g (J CD 0 ·
CD ~ (J ~ ~ CD ..
0 0
I ~ ·
CD ~ § CD S CD
::s ::s ~ ~ ·
~ ::s S 0
(J 0.. CD ·
0 PJ ·
~ ·
0 rl- rl- 00 0 V1 00
00 ~ 0 0.. ~ ~ ·
CD CD ~ ·
0.. ~ CD ..
CD rl-
rJ ~ rl- ·
~ PJ ..
~ ·
~
f':
·
..
..
·
.
~ ~ ~
~o~
~. ~ ~
(J 0 (D
~ 00 ~.
~ (D 00
~ · 0.. p.j
==~~
o ~.
S (J ~
p.j ~ (D
00 ~. 0
~O~
~~~
~ p.j ~
(D ~ ~
f"'+o..~
o f"'+ f"'+
~ ~ 0
(D (D ~
~ ~ (D
(D ~
~. 00
o..r:r
(D (D
g. ~
p.j (D
~(D
p.j ~
~ f"'+
(D ~
p.j (D
.
.
.
~ ~ >
..... ~ ~
~ (D ~
o~
~~
(D (D
f"'+ 00
f"'+ f"'+
o ~
~~
~ ~.
(D 0..
(D (D
p.j ~
00 ~.
f"'+ p.j
~
p.j
~
(D
p.j
~.
00
p.j
~
~
~
o
~
~.
s
~
(D
~
~
N
o
~
00 (D
~ ~
o ~
§ ~
0.. ~
~. ~
~ ~.
fJQ ~
~
~
o
~
(D
::¡
~
~.
00
N
o
~
(D
0..
~.
~
0..
~
00
f"'+
~
~.
p.j
~
t:C
('D
(J
~
r.n
('D
. .
~
~
~.
r.n
~
r.n
~
r.n
~
~.
~
~
~
('D
~
o
(J
~
~.
o
~
..
..
..
·
~.
..
..
·
·
·
..
..
..
·
..
·
·
·
·
..
..
~.......
..... .
..
·
·
·
..
..
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
~..
f'.
..
·
·
·
.
~ ~ t-+t-+~
~. ~ ~ Ef ~
::ro..(t)~~
t-+ rJJ. ..... .....
P"'o ~(JQ 0
(t) HJ rJJ.. ::r ~
~z~~ (t)
(!) (!) (!) ""I ...0
CD ~ ~g ~
() ...-+ (t ..... · (!)
o (!) ~ rJ). ::J
8 ~::::~~
8~~o~
§ Š g:~ ~
õ' 8 VJ ç: '-'
~ ~ ~ (t g
~ · rJJ. (t) ~ (fQ
o ~ ~ 8 ~.
::J ::J ...-+ 0 ::J
:: 0... 80 0.. ~
~ t-+ (t) ~
(') 0 ~rJJ.
t-+ (t) ~ ·
o 8 ~Jg ft
~8...-+...-+(t
::0"-0 ~ ~ 8
\0 ~ t-+~.
~ ~ ~
~', 1\J
0...
.
z~~
(t) ~.::r
~ gg (!)
(t) (t) ~
~ ~ (t)
~ (t) (t)
~ . 0... 0...
g.~ ~
(') (') ~
o ~ ~
8 ::1 ~
~ (t) (t)
~~~
~.
~ (') ~
&t ~ (')
rJJ. ~ ·
O t-+ ~
o ~.
~8~
~ (t) ~.
o ~ r.n
~ rJJ. 0
~ (') ~
(t) ~
0... ~ (t)
~. ~
(') ~
~(fQ
~
rJJ.
en
(D
~ ~
(D
o
~
p...t. .
o
~
~
Þ-1
o
o
(D
00
00
~
~ ~ ~ nn Z
no ~
0 P-1
o ""1 0 0 ~ (D
-< (D ~ 1-0' ·
~ ~ -< ~
(D (D =:r
""1 ::J (t) 0 (D rl-
~ P-1 0 (D (D
(JQ II r:JJ. ~
(D n ~ (t) ~ PJ ~ ~
~ (Jq rl- ""
~ ~ 00
~ =:r (D
(D CD
g
Z to na ~ ~ ~ n Z
('D ~ o ~ p...;
~ c -< ('D 0 I--' · 0 (D
('D ('D ('D ~ 0 st < Þ<
~ II ~ ~ ~
PJ (D f""""+-
0 n (fQ II (D 0 st (D
~ ('D (j p...; p...;
0 r.F;J ~ ~
('D -< c (D (D \J
~ (Jq r.F;J
('D ~ ~
~ (D
PJ ('D
(fQ ~
('D f"'"'I'-
~
0
a
.
~ 00 rJJ
=:s ~ (D
f"""i'- (D ~
(D (J ~
seI&
~ ~. ~
00 00 ~.
f"""i'- =:s
00(JQ
Õ 00
~
w~ ~
=:s (D
0.. ~.
00
00 00
~ ~
~. (D
Eto..
r::Jf"""i'-
~o
(D
~~
o ~
(J 0
~~
p". (D
o :4.
=:s'--<
00
~
~
f"""i'-
=:r
(D
.
..
..
II
..
f·
·
..
..
II
·
·
·
·
..
..
..
..
·
·
·
·
-, .
('.
·
·
..
·
..
·
·
·
..
·
·
·
·
·
·
~.
('.
·
..
·
..
~~~8°
~ e: g s ~
~(J~~(D
f"""i'-=:r~v
=:r '--< ~ ~
(D ~0..(C ~
~ (D (D ~ ~
(D ~ :::-: ~ ~
~=:s~~~
o f"""i'- \. II' ~
~(t)~~g-
f"""i'- =:s (D ~ 00
=:r ~ f"""i'- (C ~
(D tñ =:r 00 (D
00 (D ~(D
~ ª ~ r6 ~
f"""i'- ,..... \. II' ~ ~ .
("þ ~~ 8 p..
3 r::J ~ =:r (D
(D ~ ~ ~
~ ~.~.
~=:r=:s=n
g ~. (JQ (D
B. (J 00-.. 0..
r-r ~ -.......
8-@~~
f"""i'- ~ =:r (D
o ~. ~.
~ ~ &
o
~
(/J
(t)
~
~
(J
~
~
~.
t:j
(JQ
r:n
>
~
(t)
~
r:n
r:n
~
(t)
(:L
.
"""
..
~
..
en
(D
~
~
o
þ-'
~
~.
=
(JQ
~
~
en
~.
~
(D
~
><
I
o
..þ.
..þ.
N
~
...
~
WI
..
..
.
..
..
·
..
""'"
..
·
..
·
..
..
..
..
·
·
~.~,
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Iii:"
"ill
..
..
..
¿;;;;
..
".:;:;;;
-
. .
~ r::;) tIj ~ · ~
(t) (t) ~ rJj ~
~ (j ~. ~ rJj
~~rJj ~~
~. ~ ~. ~ (j
; r6 Jg g. þ""
:::s f'""+ rJj
o..=rf'""+
~ (t) ~
~ ~ ~
~. ~ ~
(j ~ ~
~ (t) ~
(t) ~ (D
~ (t) rJj
f'""+ rJj Pù
o rJj ~
~~~
~. ~ =r
:::s (t) (D
(JQ :::s
rJj w~
o ~. ~
:::s -< ~
~(t)
~...... (J
:::s (t) =r
(t) ~ 0
rJj ~.
~. (J
(t) (D
~
f'""+
o
f'""+ rJj
o ~
~~
o (j
(j f'""+
~ E;
(t) (t)
rJj
o ~
:::s ~
f'""+ (t)
=r~
(t) -<
rJj ~
(t) ~.
~
~Pù
(j g:
:=":(D
~. .....
f'""+
~. (D
(t) -<
rJj (D
~
(t)
~
o
:4
.
~. rJj ~
:::s q- ~
g.§~
(t) f'""+ (t)
r6 E; ,"3
~ (t) ~
~ .....en rJj
(j rJj ~
=r ~ g
~ (j ~.
~. =r ~
:::s ~
(JQ ~ ~.
rJj ~
f'""+ rJj
o (j
~ =r
(t) (t)
~ (j
rJj ~
Q ~
f'""+ ~
~ (t)
=~
r::;) 00 ·
~ ~.
:=..::::s
o..(JQ
~.
:::s
(JQ
rJj
.....
>tr1
~ ~
(D ~.
~ rJJ.
~ ::1".
(D =:3
~(Jq
=;. r:n
rJJ. ~
~ ~
n~
µ~
o ~
~. ~
(J (D
(D rJJ.
..
..
..
..
.:
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
~
..
~!-
... ..
..
..
..
..
.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
€:
..
..
..
.
"'"
·
·
..
..
. . . 'tÎì
·
n ~ ~ z z Z ·
0 ~. ·
~ ~ 0 0
(JQ 0 ·
00 e
f"""'t- (D ·
f"""'t- ~
~ ~ rJl ..
~ ~ ~
~. ~ ~.
~. ~ 00 ~ ·
~ r::J
(D f"""'t- ·
f"""'t- ~ ~. ~.
00 00 ~ ~ ·
~.
e; ~ (JQ ~ ..
0..
f"""'t- r:::r ·
(D ~. ~
~ 0 ·
~ (JQ ~ = ~
('t) ·
0 0 (D ~ ·
f"""'t- ~ tIj
~ ~ 00 ..
þ-'
< ~ ~. ~ ·
~ ~ ~ ~. ~. .---, .
~. f"""'t- r.n r.n t' ",
~ (D 00 ·
~ (D > ~ ·
r::J ~ ~ ~.
~ f"""'t- ~ = ·
(D 0 n ~ ·
0.. ~ p- ('t) (fQ ·
~ (D ~ ~ rJl ·
(D ~ ~. ..
00 ~ ~ ·
f"""'t- ~. (JQ a
0 ~ ·
(D ..
00 0
~ (D ..
00 ~ ~ ·
(D ~
~ ·
3 n
p- ('t) ·
(D
~ r.n ·
f"""'t- ·
t~ ..
..
..
..
·
..
I
§ ~
e.e
(D ~
~o
><Œ
e~
~ 0
o ~
~ ~
~ ~
rJJ. (D
e:.. C·
o (D
~
(JQ ê
8'g"
(dJ :J.
C/'l~
~ ~
o 0
~ ~
~
rJJ.
(D
rJJ.
~
~
(J
(D
.
I
~ ~
~. ~
e.(D
~. ~
~ ~
~ (D
~~
(D 0
rJJ. (D
(D ~
~ ~.
(J ;4
~ ~.
~
~(JQ
(D ~
~ ~
(D
(J
o
S
S
§
~.
(J
~
~.
o
~
~
o
~
(D
~
rJJ.
z Z ~ Z
~ CD ~- 0
~ ~ =:r CD
N rl- 10-'- ~
o ~ ::s 10-' _
~ ~ rl- r:n
S· r:n =:r~-
(JQ CD CD ::s
~ ::s (JQ (JQ
p.. (JQ CD rl-
S· 10-'- 0 0
PJ~(JQ ~
~ CD ~ CD
~ ~ ~ ~
"-" 10-' - ~ r:n
::s =:r
"""" 10-' - 0
v'-t ('J ~
~ f"\"'I r:n
CD ~ rl-
"ê (!) 2
10-'- ~ ('J
~ ~ z
a e: ~
CD (j r:n
g =:r ~
;n a ~
~ CD ~
r;r;. CD 0
(D rl- ,.....
~ r:n \..J
~
(D
0..
.......:J
N
VI
tJ
o
(J
~S
~ ('D
o :::3
~ ~
o ~
00 ::t.
('D 0
p..:::3
~o
o ~
~ Z
('D ('D
~ ('D
p..
CP
~
·
·
..
·
.::
·
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
·
..
·
..
..
..
'.
·
..
..
..
..
..
..
·4·
..
..
·
·
..
..
..
t .
..
·
·
..
~~ ~ ==
~. ~ 0 "J
~ 0 rJJ.
~ -< ~ ~
~o.:s:~
~ (D =:r (D
2 ~ ~ ~
~ (D (D (D
~.~ ~
~~Õ(D
0.. ~ (JQ ~
(D 0 ~
8 ~ ~~
-<~~
~~(D
~ ~ 0
(D (D ~
. f""""I'- f""""I'-
~~=:r
""""'=:r(D
~ ~. (JQ
(D 0 ~
~ =:r g
f""""I'- ~ ~
o ~. 0..
~ :=:-..
(D ~ Z
~ 0 (D
~ f""""I'- ~
o f""""I'-
~ ~
~
0..
I
=:r~
~. =:r
(JQ (D
~>
~ ~
~ Ro
o..~
=:rf""""l'-
~ 0
~ ~
~ (D
o :.
~ rJJ.
~~
o~
~ ~
~ 0
~. ~
(D ~.
~ S
o ~
~ ~
~. "<
f""""I'-
""
~
~
(D
f""""I'-
~.
~
.
~ ~ ÞO-r-1
~ 0 l.!..J
~ 3 ~.
N '" ~
U) \.11' ~.
Z (D ~
~"""'(JQ
NZ.......
o (D 0
2. ~ ~
Jg (D (D
o ~ ~
""'t .... 00
0..00
-. PJ
S (D ~
~ ~ (D
~ Cf3. ~
~ 0
(D ~
(D 0
~. Hj
~ 00
(JQ ~
~ ~
(D ~
~ 8.
~ (D
~. ~
@ ~
3 ~
(D ~.
~(JQ
fZ ~.
~
~
o
~
o
r:n
(D
p..
~
o
~
(D
~
~
n
o
~
~
~.
~
~
(D
p..
~
ö
o
o
S
(D
~
~
~
~
~.
o
~
o
~
Z
(D
(D
p..
~
~
·
·
·
·
-.
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
-:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
..
·
..
..
..
..
..
..
e- :
..
..
..
..
o
=
E?
(t)
>
~
Ro
~
~~
o ~
~ 0
~ n
~
~.
(t)
~
rJJ.
~
~
z
(D
~
tyj
~
~
Þ--' ·
~
s
(D
~
~
~
o
o
~
S
I
~cT~
~. ~ =:r
= ~. (þ
00 ~ !1
00 0
oo~
(þ 0
00 00
~. (þ
~ 0..
~~
=:r
~. 0
00 ~
~ (þ
o ~
&. ~
o ~
~ ~
o ~
Hj:¿
Z(þ
o ~
::4.=:r
=:r(þ
~~
~. 00
(J ~.
=:ro..
~ (þ
§ g
0..00
§
0..
I
~ ~
(þ =:r
~ (þ
~~
~ ~
o..~
~ ~
~ 0..
~
~O
o ~
S ~
~ ~.
(þ 00
00
~. ~
0..0
(þ (J
~ ~
C". (þ
~ 0..
~
~.
~ ~
00
~ §
~.
~
0..
~
00
~
~
~.
~
~
.
~ n ~
~ 0 ~
~ S ~
\T S ~.
~ ~ g-
~. ~
~ ~. ~
(D n ~
rJ;J. ~ '~
rJ;J. 0"". ~
~ § (D
o ~ ~
~O~
Z~~
o (D a
~~~
~ ~ ~.
~O~
~. rJ;J. (D
n (D ~
g: :¿ (D
~ (D <
~ ~ (D
~~õ
~(D~
~. ~ ~
~ (D ~
~ rJ;J. (D
rJ;J. ~. ~
~~
(D 0
g~
rJ;J.
~
~
o
~r5
(D 0
~ ~
I 1 n
~ ~.
=-. q
o ....
~ rJJ
rJJ
~
o
~
(D
~
·
·
·
·
8:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
~.
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
~:
·
·
·
·
I
S ~
~ =r
rJj (D
o r::r
=:s ~
~ ~
~ s,
~ t""'t-
~=r
~ (D
~ t""'t-
0..0
~~
§ (D
o..~
rJj ~
(j ~.
~ ~
~ ~
~ . r::r
=:s (D
(JQ (D
=:s
(j
~
o
rJj
(D
0..
r::r
~
~
I I
~ ~ ~
=r rJj =r
(D ~. (D
rJj 0.. t""'t-
~. (D 0
(t g. ~
00 · e:.. ~
N ~ ~
o ~ ~.
~ (D ~
(D ~ ~
o..t""'t-r::r
o (D
~ g. ~
~ (D ~
S· (D (D
o..~~
~ rJj ~
...... t""'t- (D
~ r::r 0..
~. ~ r::r
e:.. ~ ~
~ >< ~
.8 e ~
o t""'t- =:s
rJj 0 g.
(D ~ (D
rJj (D
~
rJj
.
~~~
~ ~ ~.
(:L~~
00 PJ ~.
£ ~ e.
~ (D N
~. ~ (D
~ ~ PJ
(JQ PJ (:L
PJ (t) <
~ f'""+ (D
(:L~~
00 0 rD
(j ~ ~
~ (JQ ~
~ =r 00·
~ (j ~
~ · ""''''1 PJ
~ ~ ~
(JQ (D ;.
~~
~~
(:LPJ
(D ~
00 00
~.
(JQ 0
~ ~
.... f'""+
00 0
~. ~
~. (D
~ ~
(JQ 00
....
~¿'
(JQ~
So
~ r:n
~ (D
~.
o 0
~ ~
r.n. n
~ ~.
Qq
~ r:n
~
~. ~
~ 0
~ ~
p..(D
~ ~
·
·
·
·
".
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
· ·
·
·
~.
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
~:
·
·
·
s=
~
00-
o
=:3
~
~
~
~
~
~
=:3
0...
r
~
=:3
0...
00-
()
~
Þ--' ·
=:3
{fq
I
~ z
o (D
8 ~
s g.
S =:r
o ~
p-rJJ
~~
(D ~
f"""'t- rJJ
=:r~
(D ~
(D (D
,.c ~
~ 0
~. ~
~(JQ
S =:r
(D rJJ
~~
f"""'t- ~
~~
~ f"""'t-
~ 0
(D
~
o
~
~.
(D
~
rJJ
n
I ~.
~ ~ f'""'f"-
0=:r'-<
° (D
o
S~
~.g
p-~
~ (D
(D p-
f"""'t-
~ 0
f"""'t- ~
o ~
~ ~.
o rJJ
~ p-
(D
~ rJJ
~ ~.
"-'" (JQ
rJJ ~
(D (D
f"""'t-p-
rJJ
f"""'t-
o 0
~
§
f"""'t-
(D
~
~
~
rJJ
.
~8~
~ S ~
~ S §"
Pù ~ ~.
~ =:s N
=:s ~. (D
~ 0
3 ~ ~
~. CI'J.
r:J 0 (D
(D =:s 0
~ f'""'f"- ~
o 0 =:s
~ ~ (D
õ ~ ~
~ CI'J. 0
(D CI'J. ~
~ 0 (D
: ~ ~"
::r CI'J. CI'J.
~ f'""'f"- ~.
o 0 =:s
~ S (JC¡
(JQ ~.
::r=:s
o ~.
~ 3
~.
~~
(D
~~
~~
~ 0
~r:n
~ (D
~.
o 0
~ Hj
r.n n
~ ~.
Qq
~ r:n
r-+--
~. ~
~ 0
~ ~
0-.(1)
~ ~
·
..
·
·
·
8.
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
~.
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
..
·
·
·
·
1.
·
·
·
I
s-~
rJJ (D
(D ~
rJJ 0
~ ~
(D (D
rJJ ~
~.
Q. ~.
(D rJJ
g~
~.~
~~
N 0
o ~.
2. S
~ ~
(JQ ft
Q.~
~. ~
~oo
~. 0
(J 0
~
~
(D
~
~
o
S
~
=:r
(D
.
I ~ cJ tI"j
w (D ~ <
0\ ~ n (D
o ~ ~~
~ .-; ::p
(D (D 0 n
~ -< S so
I'T'\ (D ~
..ë ~ (¡) S
~. ~ ~ §
Q. ~ (D ~.
g ã. g
~ ~ ~.
o ~ 0
~~~
~ ~ ~
o N 0
~ § ~
~ (D ~
::rO-.S
(D~
~. ~ ~
(JQ 0 00
::r~ ~
~ (D cJ
~~
w~
I
~
=:r
(D
~
~
o
~
o
rJJ
(D
Q.
~
o
~
(D
~
.
z
o
~
o
~
(D
~
00
::r
~
~
~
(D
~
(J
(D
~. (t)
rJJ 0-.
~
N ~
o w
o
~
(D ~
~ (t)
~
n
~. ;
.... ~ .
r:n r:n
~~
CD CD
(JQ;'c
~ ~
~ CD
~ r:n
~ . r-+--
o n
~ 0
§ ~
o.~
a ~
s. ~
0. ~.
CD r-+--
~~
~ r-+--
CD ~
r:n CD
·
·
·
·
...
~J .
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
~:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
~.
·
·
·
.
I 0 Z
::1 0
~ ~ s
'-< () 0
o p- ~
~ ~ (D
(D 0 f"'"'t-
f"'"'t-p-
~ PJ
~ ~
(D 0
~ ::1
(D
~.
rJj
~
~
o
~
o
rJj
(D
0...
~
~
~
::r
~.
rJj
~
~
"-"'"
f"'"'t-
o
~
(D
~
()
PJ
::1
cr
(D
~
~
PJ
()
(D
0..
~
o
~
I
~~
o ::r
S (D
~~
::r~
(D~
(j 0
~ rJj
o (D
~ 0...
rJj ~
~ 0
õ ~
~ ~
(D ~.
~ rJj
~
~
~
o
~
~.
S
~
(D
~
'-<
~
-..
~
o
o
~
(D
~
.
rJ). »
(D ~
~ ~ ~
~ ::1
~ (D
~. ~
o f"'"'t-
::1 0
e:~
rJ). (D
f"'"'t- ~
PJ 00
::1 a
g ~
rJ).
f"'"'t-
-..
VI
o
o
~
(D
~
~
(D
~
~
~.
~
(D
0...
a
(D
(D
f"'"'t-
PJ
~
~
(D
rJ).
()
~
~.
cr
(D
0..
~
n
o
~
r-+-
~.
~
~
(D
0...
~
n
~. ~
r-+-~
~ ~.
..... 00
00 ?d
?d(D
(D~
~ ~
~oo
~~
õ· n
~ 0
r:n S
§~
0... (6 ·
Qoo
8. ~
0... ~.
~~
~. ~
~ ~
(D (D
r:n
·
·
·
·
ð:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
~:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
~.
·
·
·
.
I ~ I
PJ ~ ~
~oo §=r.
~ 0 0.. rJ1
rJ1 ~ rJ1
§ ~ (j ~
-~ ,." ~ 0
'< ...,~ ~. ~
rJ1 (J ::s 0
(J ~ {JQ rJ1
~ (D ~ E-
(t¡ (1) (t¡ (j
g S'"ê 0
~. ~ ~. s
Jg aq ~ "0
~ ~ s ~
~ PJ (D rJ1
~ ~ s. ~
~ ~ rJ1 -<:
~ f'\"'I ~.
~ ~ ~
o ~ ~
;j. (1) ~
0.. ~ (D
(t¡...c (J
0.. ~ ~.
~. q
(D -..
0.. rJ1
.
~>
~ ==
o..~
00 0
(J ~
~ (D
~. ~
~ 00
fJQ 8
~ ~
~ 00
o ~
s. (J
00 0
~. 8
0""0
~ ~
00,-<
~
~.
g.
g.
(D
n
~.
~
'-<
"..
00
D'"""Ì
~þ-'
~ ~.
~ rJJ.
00 ~
~(D
C£~
~ ~ (D
n ~ 00
o ~ ~
~ ~'n
~ 0
~. ~ 0
~ 00 t:j
~ ~ ~
~ ~ :::-:
~ 0.. (D
000
S. §
~e-
~
I--' · ~
~ þ-'
(D (D
00
·
..
..
..
~:
..
..
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
..
..
..
..
..
~:
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
,
..
..
..
,
..
1 :
,
,
,
.
.
~. ~
~""O ~ g::r
(þ a (þ (þ 00'
~ ~,.-+ g ~
.-+ p.o 0 (D
~ (D ~ ~.g
<:: ~ (D ~(D
(D 1-1..... 'JJ
~~~ (D.-+
~. P'" ~. n n
~ o· == ~. 0
g. ::r g" q.g
('D ~ oo~.
1""'\ _ 'P' ~ (þ
\ J. :::::: -< (D 'JJ
::+.' ~ ~ ' (Jq .¿
'-< (D - ¡:: <::
~ ~ ~~.
¡:: g: ~,g.
o(D 0.-+
(D .-+ ~ ::r
f""+ 0 00 ('D
::r 0 'JJ
(þ.-+ ""0
~ P'" ~.
('D ('D ~ .
('D ~ f""+
~ ~
~ s..
~
.
~z
o ('D
n
~~
~. ('D
o ~
~ c;)
oJ E:
~ ('D
~ -<
f""+ ('D
o 00
~ g.
~ ~
g.
~.
00
~
(D
~rJJ
~ (D
~(D
µ~
~. ~
o
~~
00' ~ rJJ
§ CD ~
.§ ;!¡ ~
""0 0
a ~
~
~
~.
~
('D
A
·
a
a
·
ð:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
~.
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
f).
·
·
·