The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1998-07-13 Agendas CITY OF NQ~TH RICttLAND HillS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 1.3, ·1998 - 5:50 P ~M. ' . Fotthe Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Pre-Council Chambers, 7301' Northeast Loop 820. , NUMBER ITEM . ACTION TAKEN 1. Discuss Items from Regular July 13 Agenda (S Minutes) , .' " 2. IR98-13S" Meadow Creek Road; Proposed Road Humps (S Minutes) . 3. IR 98-1391 Possible Changes to Landscaping & Sign Regulations (1S ~inutes) . 4. IR 98-136 Review Visions and Significant Initiatives for Several Operating Departments (4S Minutes) I :S. Other Informational Items (S Minutes) . ......' . . Page 2 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 6. *Executive Session (15 Minutes) - The Council may enter into closed executive session to discuss the following: A. Personnel Matters under Goverment Code §551.074 (10 Minutes) Assistant City Secretary B. Report on Litigation by Attorney under Government Code §551.071 (5 Minutes) Henderson vs. City of NRH 7. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 13, 1998 . For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items on the consent agenda and will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 581-5502 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN I 1. I Call to Order I I 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Special Presentations Presentation by Jim Browne of the NSGA'S National Gold Medal Award 5. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda . . . . NUMBER 6. a. b. c. GN 98-71 d. GN 98-72 e. GN 98-73 f. GN 98-74 g. PU 98-49 h. PU 98-50 i. PU 98-51 ITEM Consent Agenda Item(s) Minutes of the Pre-Council Meeting June 22, 1998 Minutes of the Regular Meeting June 22, 1998 Approve "No Parking Anytime" Zone for Skylark Circle at the Meadow Lakes Drive Intersection - Ordinance No. 2316 Approval of Interlocal Agreement with BISD on Fiber Optic Project - Resolution No. 98-28 Approval of 1998 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant - Resolution No. 98-27 Amendment to Ordinance No. 2304 Regarding Training of Board and Commission Members - Ordinance No. 2315 Award Bid for Recreation Center HVAC Replacement to Freer Mechanical in the Amount of $330,318 Authorize to Participate in the City of Fort Worth Cooperative Purchasing Program for the Purchase of Fuel Authorize Interlocal Agreement with the City of Haltocity for the Purchase of a Gradall Excavator from AIS Continental in the Amount of $199,808 , -.. It~m_<:: - .~-I nRxf ..."',..""\ Page 2 ACTION TAKEN . . Page 3 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 6. Consent Agenda Items (Continued from Page 2) j. PAY 98-03 Final Payment to Speed Fab-Crete for Police Property and Evidence Building k. PAY 98-04 Final Payment to Pete Durant and Associates for Support Services Building 7. PZ 98-15 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of WSI Architects for a Zoning Change on Tract 3R, M. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520 from R7MF Multi Family to PD Planned Development for an Independent Living Facility (Located in the 6200 Block of Glenview Drive) - Ordinance No. 2314 8. PZ 98-16 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Jim Makens for a Zoning Change from AG Agricultural to C-1 Commercial on a Portion of Tract 11 B, 1. Peck Survey, A-1210 (Located in 8700 Block of Davis Blvd.) - Ordinance No. 2306 (Postponed at the June 8, 1998 Council Meeting) 9. PZ 98-26 Request of Brad Young of MDK Development Corporation for Site Plan Approval to Reduce the Masonry Requirement at 5411 Hilltop Drive 10. PS 97-60 Request of Jim Walker for a Replat of Lot 1R, Block 2, Thompson Park Estates Addition. (Located in the 6300 Block of Precinct Line Road) Page 4 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 11. PS 98-13 Request of Cook Consultants for a Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Waterford Addition. (Located in the' 6200 Block of Glenview Drive) 12. GN 98-66 Appointments to Crime Control and Prevention District (Postponed at the June 22, 1998 Council Meeting) 13. GN 98-67 Appointments to Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation (Postponed at the June 22, 1998 Council Meeting) 14. GN 98-68 Appointments to Boards! Commissions 15. GN 98-69 Appointments to the Youth Advisory Committee 16. GN 98-70 Appointments to Civil Service Commission 17. GN 98-75 Presentation of Preliminary Financial Plan & Preliminary Project Plan and Calling a Public Hearing to Create a Richland Plaza Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone 18. PW 98-12 Waive Collection of NRH Water and Wastewater Impact Fees for Birdville High School . . . . Page 5 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 19. PW 98-13 Waive Property Owners' Cost Participation on Colorado Boulevard Road Humps 20. (a) Citizens Presentation (b) Information and Reports 1. I R 98-134 Youth Advisory Committee Final Report 2. IR 98-137 North Davis Community Overlay Presentation 21. Adjournment POSTED /}-/o-CJ;7 Date -.:5: </0 ÆJ lYl. Time f3@~ INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. . ~ Date: July 13,1998 ~ Subject: APpointments to Council Committees V Mayor Scoma has appointed the following Council members to the City Council Committees listed below: CIP COMMITTEE Lyle E. Welch Frank Metts, Jr. Don Phifer Charles Scoma (Alternate) WASTEWA TER SYSTEM ADVISORY COMMITTEE Russell Mitchell WA TER ADVISORY COMMITTEE Russell Mitchell . NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES REPRESENTATIVE Charles Scoma (voting representative) Don Phifer (alternate) TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE REPRESENTATIVE Charles Scoma (voting representative) Don Phifer (alternate) NORTH TEXAS COMMISSION Don Phifer NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS JoAnn Johnson CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPRESENTATIVE Charles Scoma Respectfully submitted, . (7tU7l1d1ci I~ Patricia Hutson City Secretary ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS . e . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES December 3, 1997 PRESENT Randy Shiflet - Deputy City Manger Jim Browne - Parks & Recreation Director Larry Koonce - Finance Director Jackie Theriot - Accounting Manager Victor Jones - Utility Services Manager Bret Starr, Accountant AGENDA ITEMS Item 1: Approve Minutes of Previous Meetina Action: A motion to approve the minutes was made by Jackie Theriot, seconded by Victor Jones, and passed without objection. Item 2: Approval of Investment Report, FY 1996-1997 Action: A motion to approve the annual investment report was made by Jim Bro'Mle, seconded by Jackie Theriot, and passed without objection. Item 3: Addition/Removal of Broker/Dealers Discussion: As a result of the certification and liability sections of the Public Funds Investment Act of 1995, Prudential Securities has decided to drop all of it's local government clients in the State of Texas to reduce their legal liability. Our brokers with Prudential have moved to Everen Securities. Everen meets all the criteria to do business with the City. Over the last two years, our account with Prudential has generated 10-15% of the City's total investment business. Staff recommends that Prudential be dropped and Everen be added to the list of approved broker/dealers. Action: A motion to replace Prudential Securities with Everen Securities on the list of approved brokers was made by Randy Shiflet, seconded by Larry Koonce, and passed without objection. It . . Item 4: Investment StrateQY for Fiscal Year 1997/1998 Discussion: Staff presented a cash flow forecast and projected investment structure for the fiscal year at the meeting. Short term funds will be invested to match projected cash flows. Long term investments will continue to be invested in a two-year laddered portfolio. Because of the flat yield curve, investments beyond two years will not be pursued at this time. Action: A motion to approve the current investment strategy was made by Jackie Theriot, seconded by Victor Jones, and passed without objection. " . . . MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, T~XAS, HELD AT THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL CHAMBERS LOCATED AT 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 May 4, 1998 ATTENDANCE PRESENT Board: Sharon Battles Pam Jackson Bobbie Lambert Lorraine Miller Ann Perchard Rick Work Staff: Jim Browne Christina Lopez Bill Thornton Monica Sue Walsh Chris Swartz ABSENT: John Pena Vice Chairwoman Board Member Board Member Board Member Board Member Board Member Director of Parks and Recreation Administrative Secretary Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation Aquatic Manager Board Alternate ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER Ms. Battles called the meeting to order May 4, 1998 at 6:0S p.m. ITEM 2. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Mr. Work made a motion, seconded by Ms. Miller, to approve the minutes of the April 6, 1998 meeting. (Motion passed 5-0) ITEM 3. SPECIAL RECOGNITION FOR DON TIPPS Mr. Jim Browne presented a special Proclamation to Mr. Don Tipps for his years of service on the Park and Recreation Board. Mayor Brown arrived at the mee~ing and also presented the Proclamation to Mr. Tipps. ITEM 4. RECREATION, ATHLETICS, SENIOR ADULTS AND TENNIS CENTER REPORTS Ms. Walsh updated the Board on the following: The "Time of Your Life" brochures should be mailed out next week and will focus on the Recreation Center's 10th anniversary. Spring Break Camp was held with new programs introduced such as fishing, archery and ecology projects. Bursey Road Senior Center held their Volunteer Luncheon with sixty-five seniors in attendance. The Bursey Center has scheduled a luncheon, for May 22, to honor Sharon McKinney for her service as a volunteer teacher. Ms. McKinney has been with the center since it opened. Dan Echols Senior Center decided to cancel their Saturday Night Dances due to the cost of the band opposed to the number in attendance. Dan Echols held their Volunteer Luncheon with thirty-nine in attendance. Dan Echols held their Spring Craft and Bake Sale and had over $800 in sales. Corporate Challenge opening ceremonies was held on April 25th with eleven teams competing. The Corporate Challenge is halfway through. North Richland Hills is in first place so far in their division. The Richland Tennis Center Men's USTA spring leagues started competing April 4. Six Men's teams are calling Richland Tennis Center "Home". District 3A hosted their high school district tournament at the Tennis Center on April 6-7. - - rr e . . . . . 5. PARK OPERATIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Mr. Thornton updated the Board on the following: Calloway Branch Trail and Little Bear Creek Trail are in the preliminary design phase and the acquisition of any necessary easements. The second section of the North Electric Trail is underway along with the installation of the bridge. The grant agreements are being executed on the Thornbridge Neighborhood Park, then the park design will be completed. Staff anticipated approval from TxDOT for the Phase I Bike Route Signage, Signs and Maps. Once approval is received the map will be sent out for print and installation of the signs will begin. Preliminary trail alignment is being completed on the North Hills Mall Multi-Use Trail. Once the trail meets TxDOT standards the plans and specifications will be prepared. Girls Fast Pitch Softball Complex is near completion with fine grading, sod installation and general clean up to be completed. Plans and specifications are nearing completion for the 100 Acre City Park Site. Once complete they will be submitted to TPWD. When we receive approval the project will be bid out. Installation has begun on the Standard Park Signage. Signs will be installed at Richfield Park, Richland Tennis Center, Norich Park and Linda Spurlock Park at this time. Construction continues at NRH20 for the 1998 Enhancements. The contractor has had some challenges with the wind, rain and the shortage of concrete while working on the new water coaster. City Council approved the Agreement with TxDOT, for the Cotton belt Trail, at their April 13 meeting. Staff plans to take the joint agreement with Southlake and Colleyville to the next Council meeting. Once the design has been completed it will be submitted to TxDOT for approval and then bid as one project jointly with South lake and Colleyville. The Park System Master Plan Focus Groups have been scheduled for Monday, May 18, 1998 at the Recreation Center. The "involved users" focus group will be from 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. The PSMP Executive Committee submitted names of individuals to participate. The "Random" focus group will be from 8:00 - 10:00 p.m. This group will consist of a residents - . selected randomly with no requirement of use of recreation facilities. The focus groups will be asked questions from a survey and both groups' priorities will be compared. A Town Hall . meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, June 18, 1998. The first hour of the meeting will be dedicated to public input in the Park System Master Plan. A Ribbon Cutting Ceremony has been scheduled for the Girls Fast Pitch Softball Complex at Walker's Creek Park for Tuesday, June 9, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. Members of the Women's Olympic Gold Medalist Softball Team will be on hand for the ceremony and autographs. 6. AQUA TICS REPORT Mr. Chris Swartz updated the Board on the following: A name has been selected for the new uphill water coaster, "GREEN EXTREME". The name was chosen after a long process of staff suggestions, guest suggestions, creative team reviews, guest reviews and focus groups. Approximately 275 team members have been hired and staff is moving forward with training. Season pass sales continue with the park being ahead of last year's season pass sales by 69% at this time. A GREEN EXTREME "Sneak Peek" has been scheduled for May 22nd, in the evening, for season pass holders and VIP's so they may be the first to ride the "GREEN EXTREME". . 7. ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT PRESENTATION Mr. Thornton presented the results of the Market Analysis for the Arcadia Development Corporation for the master planned development of 330 acres currently owned by E-Systems Trust. The proposed project could include a recreation center, amphitheater, ice arena, lakes, trails, cafés, retail shops and possibly living space above market centers. Mr. Thornton stated that this high quality development will be done somewhere in Tarrant County and this is an ideal location. One option for the financing of the project is a TIF (Tax Increment Financing District) whereas the revenues pay for the amenities. The Board will be updated, as more information about the proposed development becomes available. e . . e 8. BACKGROUND CHECKS ADDDED TO YOUTH SPORTS GROl)P USER CONTRACTS City Council requested that the Park & Recreation Board evaluate and make a recommendation regarding background checks for individuals involv~d in youth sports. The Park Board discussed this issue with input from the Richland Youth Association, North Richland Hills Soccer Association as well as information gathered from other existing organizations and cities. The youth organizations in North Richland Hills are in favor of the background checks and would like to see the City implement the process with set criteria. Motion: Ms. Miller made a motion, seconded by Ms. Perchard, to form a committee to analyze and give staff and Park Board information on criteria for criminal background checks. Motion carried 5-0. The committee will be comprised of the following: Rick Work, Chairperson, Ann Perchard Lorraine Miller Monica Walsh & Jim Browne will serve as staff liaisons. i \ 9. OTHER INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Mr. John Turner, President of the North Richland Hills Soccer Association, thanked the Park Board for Green Valley Soccer Complex. They have received numerous comments about how nice the facility is. The Board requested a schedule of the upcoming events regarding the Ribbon Cutting at Girls Fast Pitch Softball Complex, Green Extreme "Sneak Peek" and the Town Hall meeting. 10. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Battles adjourned the meeting at 8:20 p.m. J«~. ~ Sharon Battles, Vice Chairperson ATTEST: o ~A£L' (1 ~øpa.-O Christina A. Lopez, Administrative Secretary · e e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS MAY 21,1998 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Duer at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present ZBA Members Chairman Dr. Tom Duer Cindy Martin Jimmy Bellomy Billy Cypert Bill Schopper City Staff Director Planner Recording Secretary Plans Examiner Barry LeBaron Christopher Baker Valerie Taylor P.J. Skare 3. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF APRIL 16, 1998 APPROVED Mr. Bellomy made the motion, seconded by Mr. Cypert to approve the minutes of the March 19, 1998 meeting. The vote was 5 - O. Messrs. Schopper, Christensen, Bellomy, Duer and Ms. Martin were in favor of this motion. Chairman Duer explained that this board consists of five voting members and it requires four affirmative votes in order for a variance to pass. 1 · -4. BA 98-15 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF KENNETH PHILLIPS FOR A SIDE BUILDING LINE ENCROACHMENT ON LOT 22R, BLOCK 2, STONYBROOKE SOUTH ADDITION. (LOCATED AT 8414 RUTHETTE DRIVE) APPROVED Chairman Duer opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Kenneth Phillips presented this request explaining that he had recently purchased this home and during that process found that his home encroaches the side building line by 1 ~ '. Mr. Phillips is requesting a variance to avoid trouble when he sells his home. Chairman Duer called for additional proponents. Seeing none, he called for any opponents and there were none. The public hearing was closed. Ms. Martin made the motion to approve BA 98-15 as requested. Mr. Bellomy seconded the motion and it carried 5 - O. Messrs. Schopper, e Cypert, Bellomy, Duer and Ms. Martin were in favor of this request. 5. BA 98-16 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF KENT DAVIS FOR A FRONT BUILDING LINE ENCROACHMENT ON LOT 3R1-BR, BLOCK 1, MARTIN ADDITION. (LOCATED AT 6817 NOB HILL DRIVE) APPROVED Chairman Duer opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Kent Davis presented his request. He explained that he is requesting a variance on the front building line so he can utilize more buidlable area for his new home. Responding to a question, Mr. Davis stated the home he intends to build is 3500 square feet. e Chairman Duer called for additional proponents. Seeing none, he called for opponents, seeing none the public hearing was closed. 2 · Mr. Cypert, seconded by Mr. Bellomy moved to approve BA 98-16 as requested. The motion carried with a vote of 5 - O. Messrs. Cypert, Bellomy, Schopper, Duer and Ms. Martin were in favor of this request. 6. BA 98-17 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF RUSSELL SKIPPER TO VARY FROM THE COVERED PARKING REQUIREMENT ON LOT 33, BLOCK 20, NORTH PARK ESTATES ADDITION. (LOCATED AT 7409 SANDHURST LANE SOUTH) APPROVED Chairman Duer opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come forward. e Ms. Skipper presented this request stating that they have 3 children and 1 on the way. They were in the process of enclosing their garage for an additional bedroom when Code Enforcement informed them they would need a building permit and variance before they could continue work. Ms. Skipper stated that the garage will be able to be converted back into a garage and that they have no intention of putting up a carport. Ms. Skipper gave the Board members copies of letters from surrounding property owners stating their approval for the requested garage conversion. Mr. Cypert, seconded by Chairman Duer, made the motion to approve SA 98-17. The motion carried with a vote of 4 - 1. Messrs. Cypert, Duer, Bellomy and Ms. Martin were in favor of this request. Mr. Schopper was opposed. 7. SA 98-18 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF IRENE DUNN TO ALLOW A SIDE BUILDING LINE ENCROACHMENT FOR A FENCE ON LOT 1, BLOCK 8, HOLIDAY NORTH ADDITION. (LOCATED AT 5912 SUSAN LEE LANE) APPROVED Chairman Duer opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come forward. e Ms. Dunn explained that she had contracted a fence company to build a 6' iron fence on her property. She was unaware a permit was required. The posts have been placed, in concrete, in the ground and it would be costly to have them 3 removed. She stated that she believes the fence would be more attractive than . the 6' stockade fence that was blown over in a storm several years back. Seeing no additional proponents or opponents, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Schopper, seconded by Mr. Cypert, made the motion to approve SA 98-18 as requested. The motion carried with a vote of 5 - O. All members were in favor of this request. 8. BA 98-19 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF TIM WALSH TO VARY FROM THE COVERED PARKING REQUIREMENTS ON LOT 4, BLOCK 23, NORTH PARK ESTATES ADDITION. (LOCATED AT 7408 SANDHURST LANE SOUTH) APPROVED Chairman Duer opened the public hearing and called the applicant forward. Mr. Tim Walsh presented his request stating that he too has 2 children and 1 on the way and their work was stopped by Code Enforcement as well. Mr. Walsh also presented letters of approval from his surrounding property owners and e stated his conversion can be reversed and also doesn't want a carport. Seeing no additional proponents or opponents Chairman Duer closed the public hearing. Mr. Cypert, seconded by Mr. Bellomy, moved to approve BA 98-19 as requested. The motion carried with a vote of 4 - 1. Messrs. Cypert, Bellomy, Duer and Ms. Martin were in favor of this request. Mr. SChopper was opposed. 9. STAFF REPORTS Mr. LeBaron distributed copies of the newly adopted rules for Boards and Commissions and stated if anyone had any questions, he would be glad to answer them. 10. CITIZEN COMMENTS There were none. e 4 · 11. ADJOURNMENT Having no additional business to conduct, the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. ? ~ Chairm~uer e e 5 · e e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS JUNE 11,1998 -7:30 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Vice-Chairman Richard Davis at 7:30 p.m. PRESENT ABSENT CITY STAFF 2. ROLL CALL Vice Chairman Richard Davis Don Ferguson Don Bowen Mark Wood Paul Miller Ted Nehring David Barfield Director, Planning Barry LeBaron Planner Christopher Baker Recording Secretary Valerie Taylor Asst Director/Public Works Kevin Miller Staff Engineer Julia Skare Mayor Charles Scoma 3. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF MAY 28,1998 APPROVED Mr. Wood, seconded by Mr. Ferguson moved to approve the minutes of May 28, 1998. The motion carried with a vote of 5 - O. Messrs. Bowen, Davis, Ferguson, Miller and Wood were in favor of this motion. Page 1 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes e . e 4. PS 97-60 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF JIM WALKER FOR A REPLAT OF LOT 1R, BLOCK 2, THOMPSON PARK ESTATES. (LOCATED IN THE 6300 BLOCK OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD) APPROVED Mr. Davis opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Barry Hunsworth, Carroll Consultants, presented this request for Conoco. He stated he concurs with all of staff's issues. Chairman Davis called for additional proponents. Seeing none, he called for any opponents. Mr. Billy Cypert, Director of Buildings and Grounds for Birdville LS.D., recited excerpts from the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission's laws regarding the sale of alcohol around schools and voiced his concern of Conoco selling beer at this location. Seeing no additional opponents, Vice Chairman Davis closed the public hearing. Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mr. Ferguson, moved to approve PS 97-60 provided no Certificate of Occupancy is issued until the sewer service at the high school is available. The motion carried with a vote of 5 - O. Messrs. Bowen, Ferguson, Davis, Wood & Miller were in favor of this request. Page 2 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes e e e -5. PS 98-13 REQUEST OF COOK CONSULTANTS FOR A FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, WA TERFORD ADDITION. (LOCATED IN THE 6200 BLOCK OF GLENVIEW DRIVE) APPROVED Mr. Jack Cook, Cook Consultants, presented this request and stated that he agrees with all of the engineer's comments. Mr. LeBaron stated that staff is about to finalize the drainage easement issue and staff recommends that the plat be moved forward to the Council, insuring that the plat wouldn't be filed until this item was resolved. Mr. Wood, seconded by Mr. Bowen, moved to approve PS 98-13 subject to engineer's comments and absolute identification of the location of the drainage easements prior to the filing of the plat. The motion carried with a vote of 5 - O. Messrs. Wood, Bowen, Ferguson, Davis & Miller were in favor of this request. Page 3 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes e 6. PS 98-29 REQUEST OF ADAMS CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LOTS1R & 2, BLCK 6, TAPP ADDITION. (LOCATED IN THE 6400 BLOCK OF NE LOOP 820) APPROVED Mr. Don Craig, Adams Consulting Engineers presented this request. He stated they are requesting a waiver of the sidewalks along the frontage road of NE Loop 820 and agree with the remainder of staffs comments. Mr. Ferguson, seconded by Mr. Bowen, moved to approve PS 98-29 waiving the sidewalks along NE Loop 820. The motion carried with a vote of 5 - O. Messrs. Ferguson, Bowen, Davis, Wood & Miller were in favor of this request. e e Page 4 - 6/11/98 P 8. Z Minutes e 7. PZ 98-15 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF WSI ARCHITECTS FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACT 3R, M. TRIMBLE SURVEY, A-1520 FROM R-7 MULTI-FAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR AN INDEPENDENT LIVING FACILITY. (LOCATED IN THE 6200 BLOCK OF GLENVIEW DRIVE) APPROVED Vice Chairman Davis opened the public hearing and asked staff to explain this req uest. Mr. LeBaron explained that this 9.3-acre tract of land is on Glenview Drive between the Waterford on the Green and Diamond Loch apartments. It is currently zoned R-7 Multi-family. The applicant is requesting a zoning change to a planned development for a 120 unit independent living facility for senior citizens. Some of the issues involved in this request are dwelling unit size, parking and masonry requirements. e Mr. Don Averitt, Capital Senior Development, presented this request. He explained they have projects going on all over the country. He stated that because they house senior citizens, arrays of room sizes are needed to accommodate financial requirements. The rents range from $1100 - $2400 per month and they do not accept any government assistance. The monthly rent covers 3 meals a day and any transportation that is needed for residents. Mr. Averitt explained that these facilities are built according to the US Senior Citizen Act of 1986, which states the facilities are for people 55 years of age and older. No exceptions are made. Mr. Averitt stated that they are requesting a waiver of the parking requirements since a lot of the residents won't drive. Mr. Averitt explained that they are requesting a variance in the minimum dwelling unit size. The smallest unit proposed is 297 square feet. This consists of a bedroom/sitting area with a small closest and bathroom. There is an onsite library, a large dining room, hair salon and craft room. In the 10 years he has worked in Independent Living, he has never seen a facility turn into an apartment complex. They are also requesting a waiver in the required masonry explaining that this is an upscale facility. e Page 5 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes e Responding to a question, Mr. Averitt stated that he currently has this type of facility under construction in Mesquite, San Antonio and Baton Rouge. They have 30 existing facilities in operation across the United States. The unit sizes vary from 297 square feet to 840 square feet, but Mr. Averitt believes that with the common areas, the square footage issue equals out. Seeing no additional proponents or no opponents. The public hearing was closed. Discussion ensued regarding the masonry requirement and their requested waiver. Because there are so many windows and doors on this project, Mr. Cook, the project's engineer, stated it's hard to accommodate the 75% masonry. The first floor will be 100% masonry. The overall structure will be 70.6% masonry. Mr. Davis stated that he doesn't really have a problem with the masonry deviation but he does have a problem with the 297 square foot units. e Mr., Wood suggested that filing deed restrictions on the property that place an age restriction on the property would be one way to alleviate the concern of this project turning into apartments down the road. Mr. Averitt stated they would not have a problem with deed restrictions. Mr. Bowen stated that the small unit size bothers him. Mr. Wood agrees with Mr. Bowen and believes that consideration should be placed on the possibility of this project turning into apartments down the road. The market can change drastically. Mr. Miller doesn't like the smallest unit size, but stated if the market truly exists, he could live with it. Mr. Ferguson believes the deed restrictions would work well. Mr. Davis believes that the market shows a need for the elderly citizens in our community, however, is concerned about 297 square foot rooms. e Mr. Averitt believes this would be a significant addition to the City of NRH and would improve a very bad site. He stated that they have spent a tremendous amount of money trying to make this project something everyone could be proud of. The unit size, while small, fits an economic demand. Mr. Averitt stated additionally that he would be the first person to ever build a project like this in a ditch. Page 6 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes e e e Mr. Ferguson, seconded by Mr. Wood, moved to approve PZ 98-15 provided a deed restriction is filed with the County prior to permits being issued stating the 11 conditions outlined in Section 3 of the Ordinance and adding that no one under 55 years of age may be a lessee. The motion carried with a vote of 4 _ 1. Messrs. Ferguson, Wood, Miller & Davis were in favor of this request. Mr. Bowen was opposed. Page 7 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes e e e 8. PZ 98-17 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF DAVID BRANACH FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACT 7D AND 7H1, T.K. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1 055. (LOCATED AT 8801 MARTIN DRIVE) APPROVED Vice Chairman Davis opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come forward. David Branach presented this request stating that once this last step is complete, they could break ground on their new home - in about 6 weeks. Seeing no additional proponents or no opponents. Vice Chairman Davis closed the public hearing. Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mr. Wood, moved to approve PZ 98-17 as requested. The motion carried with a vote of 5 - O. Messrs. Bowen, Wood, Miller, Davis & Ferguson were in favor of this request. Page 8 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes e -9. PZ 98-25 REQUEST OF HERB CROSS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO REDUCE THE MASONRY REQUIREMENTS AT 7740 NE LOOP 820 DENIED Mr. Herb Cross, applicant, presented this request. He explained that the metal building that originally existed burned recently. This has been demolished and they are requesting to rebuild this structure as before, only 20% larger. He explained that this structure is over 360' south of the frontage of the loop and is 90' away from the road on the west and over 140' away from the road on the south. Metal structures surround this location. He stated their request is to rebuild a totally metal structure. Mr. Davis asked if anyone in the audience had anything to add to this discussion. Seeing none opened discussion amongst the Commission. e Mr. Davis asked how much expansion was planned from the original size and Mr. Cross stated about 20% larger than they were before. Additionally, Mr. Cross stated that none of the existing building contained masonry and their request is to rebuild a totally metal building. Mr. Davis explained to those in the audience that the City Council had recently passed an amendment to the zoning regulations requiring all new commercial construction consist of at least 75% masonry on each elevation and that site plan approval is required by the P&Z and City Council should a variance be granted relating to this. Under the new guidelines, his new structure should have at least 75% masonry on each elevation. Mr. Wood stated that the 75% masonry requirement has always been in place, and strictly enforced in the past. He would hate to see the Commission go backwards. Mr. Bowen believes the ordinance should be followed. Mr. Wood stated the current ordinance states they could do a metal structure if they were only replacing up to 50% of the value of the structure. e Some discussion ensued as to whether the structure was going to be larger than it originally was. It was determined that the new footprint would be 20% larger than the original footprint. Mr. Cross stated that "the building will consist of a shop on the west side and a parts area in the middle that are bigger than this other that they are working on, which is one big building that had fire walls in between it. The footprint is 20% larger than the part that burned." Page 9 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes e Mr. Bowen stated that they are doing more than 50% - they have to totally rebuild a building. He stated that even if they were building the new structure the same size as it was originally, it would be an improvement of 100%, according to the ordinance. Mr. Cross stated that was not correct. Mr. Bowen stated that is correct because there is no building there. It is being totally rebuilt. Mr. Cross stated that there is a building there, just not the part that burned. Mr. Davis asked how much burned. He stated that someone had made the determination that at least 50% of improvement of the existing structure is being replaced or added to. Mr. LeBaron stated that the Building Official had made that determination. Mr. Cross stated that he had not given the Building Official enough information, in his opinion, to make that determination. Mr. Davis stated that Mr. Cross did have the right to appeal that decision to the It Building Officials boss if he disagreed with his determination. Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mr. Wood moved to deny PZ 98-25. The motion carried with a vote of 4 - 1. Messrs. Bowen, Wood, Miller & Davis were in favor of this motion. Mr. Ferguson was opposed. e Page 10 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes e e e 10. PZ 98-26 REQUEST OF BRAD YOUNG OF MDK DEVELOPMENT CORP. FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO REDUCE THE MASONRY REQUIREMENT ON LOT 3, BLOCK 3, T APP ADDITION. (LOCATED IN THE 5400 BLOCK OF HILLTOP DRIVE) DENIED Mr. Brad Young presented his request. He stated that his client would like to expand the existing mini-warehouses on Hilltop Drive. They would like to keep the same appearance as the existing warehouses, but this facility will be climate controlled. They propose to attach non-operable doors on the outside of this new climate controlled facility that would match the orange doors on the existing facility. If the doors were operable, they would not need to apply for a reduction In masonry. Responding to a question, Mr. Young stated that it would be possible to paint fake doors on a tilt wall and that the proposed facility would look identical to the existing facility, but the doors will be inoperable. Mr. LeBaron stated that this case seems somewhat bureaucratic because if the doors functioned as doors, this wouldn't be an issue. But since inoperable doors are proposed in this internally accessed facility, the masonry requirement becomes an issue. Responding to a question, Mr. Young stated that the building would be of pre- cast concrete columns at 10' centers, with "dummy doors" that are identical to the operable doors on the existing facility. They would be mounted exactly as the operable doors. Metal liner panels with insulation would be directly behind the fake doors. Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mr. Davis, moved to deny PZ 98-26. The motion carried with a vote of 5 - O. Messrs. Bowen, Davis, Wood, Miller & Ferguson were in favor of this motion. Page 11 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes e . e 11. STAFF COMMENTS There were none. 12. CITIZEN COMMENTS There were none. 13. ADJOURNMENT Having no additional business to conduct, the meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. ~ ~~~ Secretary, Don Bowen Page 12 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes . . . , .,,- -. INFORMAL REPORTTO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL N IR 98-135 o. .\ 'I . II I Date: July 13, 1998 Subject: MEADOW CREEK ROAD; Proposed Road Humps Chuck and Lori Taylor, 6825 Meadow Creek Road, made an initial request for the installation of road humps on the street. In accordance with Ordinance No. 1921 concerning road humps, the Street Division conducted traffic counts. The initial qualification requirement is that a minimum of 500 vehicles per day travel the street. This is checked before a speed study is conducted to see if the speed criteria of 35 miles per hour is met or the petition to see if two-thirds of the property owners on the street are in favor of the road hump installations. The traffic count was 150 vehicles per day and therefore did not qualify Meadow Creek Road for consideration to have road humps. A response letter was written by Jimmy Cates, Public Works Superintendent, Street Division to the Taylors explaining this (copy attached). Mr. Robert Hart, 6817 Meadow Creek Road, subsequently became aware of this request and its denial. He telephoned my office and I discussed the matter with him and stated that I could not authorize road humps on Meadow Creek Road unless it met the criteria in accordance with Ordinance No. 1921. He stated he would probably present his request to the Council as he did at the last Council meeting. Staff would appreciate direction from Council on whether or not they want to pursue any further action or discussion on this matter. Respectfully submitted, ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS ~ --- ----- --.- CITY OF N®RTH RICHLAND HILLS . ----.-- -------.- --- Public Works November 3, 1997 Chuck & Lori Taylor 6825 Meadow Creek Road North Rich/and Hills, TX 7ô180 (817) 577-4535 RE: ROAD HUMPS; MEADOW CREEK ROAD Dear Mr. & Mrs. Taylor: . In response to your request for road humps to be installed on Meadow Creek Road, the daily traffic volume of the street must have at least 500 vehicles per day as required by the ordinance. Meadow Creek Road falls below the criteria with around 150 vehicles per day. The traffic volume criteria must be met before any consideration is given for road hump installation. If the traffic pattern for the street should change in the future, you can request that the staff re-evaluate the street for road hump eligibility. If I can answer any questions, please contact my office at (817) 581-5682. Respectfully, JC/st/pw197101 ~ Sharon Murphy, Office Supervisor . P.O, Box 820609· North RichlanóHills. Texas· 76182-0609 7200 A. Dick FIsher Dr. S" 817-581-5671 . FAX 817-656-7552 ~ ~'..., ,~ . INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 98-139 ~ Date: July 13, 1998 Subject: Possible Changes to Landscaping & Sign Regulations After recent discussions involving the City Council, City staff and hearing concerns expressed by a number of residents regarding landscaping, signs and other development criteria primarily on major corridors in our city, the staff has been working on options for addressing these concerns. We realize that an Ad-Hoc Committee is being formed to review and recommend any long term changes that might be needed in these and other areas. Until the Ad-Hoc Committee can meet and formulate recommendations to the Council, we would propose that an "Interim Review Committee" of City staff be authorized to meet with any prospective developers along our corridor areas and negotiate with them for higher landscaping standards and lower profile sign sizes and heights, encouraging monument signs in many cases. In order to expedite changes when they are identified, it would be advisable to consider removing the landscaping and sign regulations from the Comprehensive Zoning Regulations and placing them in separate City Ordinances. In order to achieve this, public hearings must be held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council since we would be changing the Zoning Regulations. Notifications of the public hearings could be made concurrently to expedite this process. (Attachment "A') e If the City Council desires to begin this process, staff can begin working on the replacement ordinances and the public hearing process for the two bodies. Attached are "sample" regulations that show a comparison to our current regulations. The "sample" regulations would be used to establish interim guidelines for the staff Committee to use and also as the basis for developing the ordinances that would replace the current Landscaping and Sign Regulations. (Attachment "B") Staff is seeking Council direction on proceeding with an "Interim Review Committee" to negotiate with prospective developers until more appropriate standards are in place. Staff is also seeking Council consensus to proceed with the public hearings and related notifications to consider removing from the Comprehensive Zoning Regulations and placing the Landscaping and Sign Regulations of that document into separate City Ordinances regulating these areas. If Council consensus is to proceed with these, steps will be taken to initiate both. Respectfully submitted. £e~ Randy Shiflet, Deputy City Manager e ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS e - e Attachment 'A" Proposed Changes to Zoning Regulations Remov,e Landscapong Section - A landscape ordinance that is not included within the zoning ordinance will be easier to amend. Any regulation contained within a zoning ordinance requires lengthy public hearings, possible property owner notifications and newspaper advertisements to comply with state mandated zoning statutes. In addition, requests for variances from a zoning regulation heard by the Zoning Board of Adjustment must prove up a hardship situation. Finding a hardship for not complying with a landscaping regulation is rather difficult and raises certain legal questions. A variance request from a regulation in an ordinance that is not a zoning regulation does not have these hardship and legal concerns to deal with. Remove the Sign Regulations Section - A hypothetical survey of area cities would probably find that approximately half of those cities would have their sign regulations contained as a part of their zoning regulations and the other half would have a stand-alone ordinance. A stand-alone ordinance makes sense for much of the same reasons as having a stand-alone landscaping ordinance. Most cities that choose to put these regulations within their zoning ordinances do so because it seems logical to put all the development regulations into one document. However, combining landscaping and sign regulations with zoning also make for a complex document and is ripe for conflicting regulations. e . e Attachment liB" Proposed Landscaping and Sign Guidelines for Interim Review Committee Pole Sign Considerations 1. The maximum height and size of a pole sign, except within the Freeway Overlay Zone shall be as follows: (This is a new feature. cUffentlya sign can be as hiah as 50 feet and as big as 300 square feet.) (FYI, last year staff surveyed the signs on Davis Blvd. and found most of them in compliance with this size requirement. There were only two or three that exceeded this size and height and those by only a few feet.) a. Maximum Height - 25 feet * b. Maximum Size - 100 square feet * 2. The maximum height and size of a major development pole sign, except within the Freeway Overlay Zone shall be as follows: (This is a chanGe from CUffent reaulations. CUffently a major development size could be as large as 1.000 square feet and as high as 60 feet) (a major development sign is only allowed when a commercial development has 100,000 s.f. or more of building.) a. Maximum Height - 25 feet * b. Maximum Size - 250 square feet * * These regulations would be thoroughly evaluated prior to recommendation for inclusion in a sign ordinance. Landscaping Consideration 1. Required Percentage a. 15% of the lot landscaped with one half of this between the building and the street (this is the same as current requirements). b. Using the current square footage credit table for trees and shrubs, trees and/or shrubs shall be planted in the street yard which have a total square footage equivalent to one- half of the square footage required by the 15% lot coverage (this is a new feature that will make p/antina of trees or shrubs mandatory and prevent the bare lookina "aI/- grass" situations). c. One 2" caliper tree shall be planted for each 1,000 square feet of street yard. Existing trees within the street yard may be included in this calculation. (This is a new requirement) 2. Landscape Credits The overall area of landscaping may be reduced by planting additional shrubs and trees above the minimum required. The area may not be reduced below 10% of the total lot area. (the CUffent reGulations aI/ow a reduction of the overal/ area from 15% of the lot to 7.5% of the lot by usinG tree and shrub credits) e . e 3. Landscape Setback There shall be a minimum setback area of ten (10) feet adjacent to all public street rights- of-way in which there is no paving, except for driveway access, or buildings and in which there shall be landscaping. Roof overhangs and awnings are permitted within this area as long as no conflict exists with the required landscaping. Loading areas, outside storage and outside display areas shall not encroach into the landscape setback. (This is a new reauirement. Currently. parking lots may be riaht next to the sidewalk and leave little area for proper landscaping. Those cities surveyed that have landscaped setbacks have been better able to achieve success with landscaping implementation). 4. Parking Lot Screening Parking, maneuvering, loading areas for people, or vehicular display and storage and boat areas which are not screened by on-site buildings or fences shall be screened from view of public streets as follows: (This is a new reauirement. currently NRH does not reauire parking lot perimeter landscape screening.) a. The screening shall be a minimum height of twenty-four (24) inches and a maximum of thirty-six (36) inches above the grade of the parking lot. b. Screening shall be solid and consist of one of the following: (1). Screening shrubs (2). Walls (3) Berms c. Screening shrubs shall be spaced a maximum of three (3) feet on center and shall be minimum of five (5) gallon containers when planted, and capable of reaching a minimum height of thirty (30) within eighteen (18) months of planting. d. Wall structures shall be masonry. e. Wheel stops shall be provided for parking spaces adjacent to a landscape setback to prohibit any car overhang over the planting area. Wheel stops shall be located twenty- four (24) inches from the end of the parking area. INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 98-136 .. * Date: . July 13, 1998 V Subject. Visions and Significant Policy Initiatives . . At the June 30 work session, we had planned to discuss in the 1998/99 budget overview some policy initiatives and visions of four of our larger city departments. There are a number of items that we will be looking at over the next 12 to 24 months that we thought might be helpful to Council as we go into our planning session for the budget at the end of this month. We have decided to schedule these visions/significant policy initiatives at the Pre-council on July 13. We will ask the Police, Fire, Parks and Recreation, and Public Works Departments to take a few minutes each to present some of their visions and major·considerations. It will not be necessary to take any action on this, but it will be more of a "heads up" for Council as we look at operations and doing business over the next couple of years. This will certainly not be the last and only time we will talk about these, but again it is to give you a briefing of some things that are likely to come and also ideas from these larger departments. We look forward to presenting this to you on the 13th. LJClld ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS 411 - tI . ~ Outline of Presentations Regarding Vision/Initiatives 1998-99 July 13, 1998 1. Parks and Recreation - Jim Browne · Town Center Development · Department Role in Youth Services Including Youth Sports Associations and Teen After School Programs · Comprehensive "City Image" /Streetscape Study · Department Reorganization and Evaluation to Support the Aforementioned Initiatives and Vision 2. Fire Deoartment - Andy Jones · Insurance Services Office (ISO) Rating - Future Improvements · Fire Department Occupational Safety and Health · Emergency Medical Service · Implementation of Tiburon RMS 2000 Safety System (Computer System) · Evaluating Future Infras~ructure Needs 3. Public Works - Greg Dickens · EPA Storm Water Permitting Program, Phase" · Downsizing of Utilities Operations in Response to Watauga Water and Waste Water System Sale · Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) · Review of Water and Waste Water Rates · CIP Street and Drainage Bond Project - Status and Evaluating Future Needs · Section 404 Regulations and Their Effect on Channel Projects · Street Maintenance 4. Police Deoartment - Jerry McGlasson · Planning for Future NeeGs · Fleet Assessment · Evaluating Current Program · Year 2000 Issues Studies and Brought Up To Date · Town Center Development Project - Study, Input on Police Service Delivery · Building/Facility Maintenance · Comprehensive Evaluation of Crime Control District f e MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS HELD IN THE PRE-COUNCIL ROOM AT CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JUNE 22, 1998 - 6:55 P.M. o,4 Present: Charles Scoma Mayor Don Phifer Mayor Pro Tem Russell Mitchell Councilman Lyle E. Welch Councilman Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman Jo Ann Johnson Councilwoman Cheryl Cowen Lyman Councilwoman Larry Cunningham City Manager Randy Shiflet Deputy City Manager Ron Ragland Assistant City Manager Patricia Hutson City Secretary Rex McEntire Attorney Greg Dickens Public Works Director Barry LeBaron Planningllnspection Director Larry Koonce Finance Director Andy Jones Fire Chief Terry Kinzie Information Services Director e Richard Albin Knowlton English Flowers Absent: Matt Milano Councilman ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT CALL TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order at 6:55 p.m. DISCUSS ITEMS There were no items discussed at this time. FROM REGULAR JUNE 22 AGENDA e e e e Pre-Council Minutes June 22, 1998 Page 2 I ITEM I DISCUSSION I ASSIGNMENT I IR 97-123 Mr. Cunningham advised that Staff had RANDY S./BARRY L. TRAINING/ previously discussed with Council the need for CONTINUING the Planning & Zoning and Zoning Board of EDUCATION Adjustment Members to attend seminars/ SESSIONS FOR training sessions to keep current on laws and BOARDS AND legislation. Councilman Mitchell has COMMISSIONS questioned if the Council should require the members of these boards to attend a continuing education seminar/worksession annually as a condition for membership. The Council recently approved an ordinance addressing Boards and Commissions and the training for P&Z and ZBA members was vague as to whether it was required. The Mayor advised he had discussed with staff the need for an annual orientation session for board members to give them information on objectives, goals and rules. The Council discussed whether the members of these two boards should be required to attend a training session and whether it should be annually or biennially. There was discussion on requiring them to attend an in-house training session conducted by staff one year and a regional/statewide training session the next year. The consensus of the Council was to require the Planning and Zoning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment Members to attend during their two-year term of office, a training session in-house and a regional/statewide training session. Staff will prepare an action item to amend the ordinance requiring them to attend training sessions. e e e Pre-Council Minutes June22,1998 Page 3 I ITEM I DISCUSSION I ASSIGNMENT I OTHER The Council discussed items from the Regular INFORMA TIONAL Agenda at this time. ITEMS Agenda Item No.9, PZ 98-18 -In response to a question from Councilman Welch concerning Wilson Lane in relation to this request, Staff advised that with the construction of North Tarrant Parkway, several sections of Wilson Lane had been removed from the Thoroughfare Plan. Agenda Item No.7, PZ 98-06 - Councilman NAN Welch was concerned that the storm water drainage from the project, would drain into Monkey Creek (Singing Hills Creek). He expressed concerns about the effect this drainage will have on the golf course and asked if a retention pond would help to control the flow. Staff explained that if the site plan was affected by any drainage issues addressed during the platting process, the site plan would be revised to accommodate the revisions. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma announced at 7:15 p.m. that the TO EXECUTIVE Council would adjourn to Executive Session for SESSION deliberation regarding real property as authorized by Section 551.052 of the Government Code. e e e Pre-Council Minutes June 22, 1998 Page 4 ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma adjourned the meeting at 7:24 p.m. Charles Scoma - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary e e e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JUNE 22,1998 -7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order June 22, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Charles Scoma Lyle E. Welch Russell Mitchell Frank Metts, Jr. JoAnn Johnson Don Phifer Cheryl Cowen Lyman Mayor Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Mayor Pro T em Councilwoman Staff: Larry Cunningham Randy Shiflet Ron Ragland Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney Absent: Matt Milano Councilman 2. INVOCA TION Councilman Mitchell gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 6¿ e e e City Council Minutes June 22, 1998 Page 2 a. "YARD OF THE MONTH" AWARDS Mayor Scoma and Ms. Jeanne Lueck, Beautification Commission Member, recognized and presented the "Yard of the Month" awards for June to: Sherry and Gaylan Gregory, 4005 Diamond Loch East; Cindy and Mark Foster, 6829 Briley; John D. and Jill Spicer, 4721 Greenway Court; Jack and Suzette Skelton, 7500 North Richland Boulevard; Cynthia and Walter Okrusch, 8316 Emerald Circle; Vaughn and Sharon Coomer, 6849 Driffield Circle; Kathy and Tim McGuire, 8808 Jason Court; Billy, Collette and Trey Terrell, 6829 Green Acres; Richard and Marilyn Gaskin, 8405 Shady Oaks. b. "LANDSCAPE OF THE MONTH" AWARDS Mayor Scoma and Ms. Jeanne Lueck, Beautification Commission Member, presented the "Landscape of the Month" award for June to Mike Lowry, Manager, Allan Samuels Dodge. 5. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA None 6. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED a. MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING JUNE 2,1998 b. MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 8, 1998 c. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JUNE 8, 1998 d. PU 98-46 - AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT WITH COMM SITE INTERNATIONAL, INC. e e e City Council Minutes June 22. 1998 Page 3 e. PU 98-47 - AWARD CONTRACT FOR INSTALLATION OF FIBER OPTIC WIDE AREA NETWORK TO MICA CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $306,545 f. PU 98-48 - AWARD BID FOR VIBRATORY ROLLER TO FUTURE EQUIPMENT COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $32,401 Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Phifer to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 6-0 7. PZ 98-06 - REQUEST OF RICHARD SHAW OF COLONIAL EQUITIES INC. FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL OF A MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON TRACT 2F2, ACKERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 19. (LOCATED SOUTH OF BROWNING DRIVE, EAST OF IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE, NORTH OF NE LOOP 820 AND WEST OF THE DART RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY) APPROVED Mr. Richard Shaw, applicant, presented the site plan to the Council and responded to their questions. Councilman Welch moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve PZ 98-06 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. After discussion, Councilman Welch amended his motion, Councilwoman Johnson amended her second, to include an additional 8 units for a total of a 500 unit multi- family development and 1,105 parking spaces. Motion carried 6-0. City Council Minutes June 22, 1998 Page 4 e 8. PZ 98-17 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF DAVID BRANACH FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACTS 7D AND 7H1, T.K. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1055, FROM AG-AGRICUL TURAL TO R1 S-SPECIAL SINGLE FAMILY (LOCATED AT 8801 MARTIN DRIVE) _ ORDINANCE NO. 2312 APPROVED Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. Mr. David Branach, applicant, appeared before the Council in favor of his request. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Scoma closed the public hearing. Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Phifer, to approve Ordinance No. 2312. Motion carried 6-0. e 9. PZ 98-18 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF JOHN BARFIELD FOR REZONING OF TRACT 1, .5 ACRES IN THE T. PECK SURVEY, A-1210, FROM C1 COMMERCIAL TO R-2 RESIDENTIAL; TRACT 2,.7 ACRES IN THE T. PECK SURVEY, A-1210 FROM R2 RESIDENTIAL TO C-1 COMMERCIAL; TRACT 3, 14.91 ACRES IN THE T. PECK SURVEY, A-1210 FROM R-4-D DUPLEX TO R-2 RESIDENTIAL; TRACT 4, 25.1 ACRES IN THE T. PECK SURVEY, A-1210 FROM 01 OFFICE TO R-2 RESIDENTIAL; TRACT 5,6.8 ACRES IN THE T. PECK SURVEY, A-1210, AND THE S. RICHARDSON SURVEY, A-1266, FROM C-1 COMMERCIAL TO R-2 RESIDENTIAL, TRACT 6, .63 ACRES IN THE T. PECK SURVEY, A-1210 FROM AG AGRICULTURAL TO C-1 COMMERCIAL (LOCATED IN THE 8300 BLOCK OF DAVIS BLVD.)- ORDINANCE NO. 2313 APPROVED Mayor Scoma opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. Mr. Doug Long, representing the applicant, appeared before the Council in favor of the req uest. e e e e City Council Minutes June 22, 1998 Page 5 Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Phifer, to approve Ordinance No. 2313. Motion carried 6-0. 10. PZ 98-25 - REQUEST OF HERB CROSS FOR A SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO REDUCE THE MASONRY REQUIREMENTS AT 7740 NE LOOP 820 APPROVED Mr. Herb Cross, CWA Construction Company and the agent representing Allan Samuel's Dodge, presented the request. Mr. Cross advised they would like to replace and reconstruct the building that burned using a metal exterior surface. Mr. Mike Lowry, General Manager for the dealership, discussed their request with the Council and responded to their questions. The Council discussed requiring masonry on different sections of the proposed facility. Councilwoman Lyman moved, seconded by Councilman Mitchell, to allow the masonry reduction, that masonry be required on the east elevation and the remainder of the building be metal. Motion carried 5-1, Mayor Pro Tem Phifer, Councilwomen Johnson and Lyman, Councilmen Mitchell and Metts voting for and Councilman Welch voting against. 11. PS 98-16 - REQUEST OF DAVID BRANACH FOR A FINAL PLAT OF LOT 9, BLOCK 15 GLENANN ADDITION (LOCATED AT 8801 MARTIN) APPROVED Mr. David Branach, applicant, appeared before the Council in favor of his request. Mr. Branach asked Council to consider changing the name of the addition on the plat from Glenann to Lot 1, Block 1, COCAMAR Addition. He explained that the P&Z Commission had changed the name to Glenann during the preliminary plat process. Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilwoman Lyman, to approve PS 98- 16 and that the name be changed to Lot 1, Block 1, COCAMAR Addition and with the condition that all drainage be taken care of. e e e City Council Minutes June 22, 1998 Page 6 Motion carried 6-0. 12. GN 98-65 - REGULATION OF SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES _ ORDINANCE NO. 2311 APPROVED Mr. McEntire, Attorney, presented the Ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Phifer moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve Ordinance No. 2311. Motion carried 6-0. 13. GN 98-66 . APPOINTMENTS TO CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT POSTPONED Mayor Scoma asked Council to postpone action on GN 98-66 and GN 98-67 until the next Council Meeting. Councilwoman Lyman moved, seconded by Councilman Mitchell, to postpone GN 98- 66 and GN 98-67 to the July 13 Council Meeting. Motion carried 6-0. 14. GN 98-67 - APPOINTMENTS TO PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION POSTPONED See item No. 13. 15. GN 98-68 - APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS/COMMISSIONS APPROVED Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to approve the appointments as listed on GN 98-68. Motion carried 6-0. e e e City Council Minutes June 22, 1998 Page 7 16. (a) CITIZENS· PRESENTATION Mr. Jerry Fugler, 7613 Hightowr, requested the Council to review the rates being charged senior citizens at Iron Horse Golf Course. Mr. Jeff Paul, 5125 Colorado Blvd., advised that he had requested at a City Council Meeting earlier in the year, that Colorado Blvd. be closed. He advised that Councilwoman Johnson had suggested that the city might pay for road humps. He advised that the city had not taken any action on the road humps. Mayor Scoma advised that an action item was never requested by the Council. Councilwoman Johnson advised she would make a request that this be placed on an agenda for action by the Council. Mr. Robert Hart, 6817 Meadow Creek, requested that speed humps be placed on Meadow Creek. He advised the street met all the requirements except for the volume of traffic. Mayor Scoma advised his request would be referred to staff and the staff would submit a report back to Council. (b) INFORMATION AND REPORTS Mayor Scoma reminded the Council of the BISD Breakfast June 23 at 7:30 a.m. Mayor Scoma advised of the three ad hoc committees being formed: Land Use, Code Enforcement and Cultural and Educational and invited the citizens to submit applications. 17. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma adjourned the meeting at 9: 15 p.m. ATTEST: Charles Scoma - Mayor Patricia Hutson - City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS c, . Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Subject: Approve "No ParkinQ Anytime" Zone for Skylark Circle at Agenda Number: GN 98-71 the Meadow Lakes Drive Intersection - Ordinance No. 2316 The Public Works Department is requesting the northwest side of Skylark Circle southwest of the Meadow Lakes Drive intersection be designated as a "No Parking Anytime" zone. Visitors to the homes at the southwest corner of this intersection are occasionally parking their vehicles and leaving them unattended on both sides of Skylark Circle. This is causing the remaining open portion of Skylark Circle to be too narrow for two vehicles to pass safely. The difficulty for passing of cars near the intersection is compounded by the erratic turning motion of cars from Meadow Lakes Drive onto Skylark Circle. The "No Parking Anytime" signs would be placed in the first 100 feet southwest of the southwest curb line of Meadow Lakes Drive on the northwest side of Skylark Circle. The Police Department has no objection to this "No Parking" zone. Recommendation: It is recommended Council approve Ordinance No. 2316. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaDle Finance Director Page 1 of ORDINANCE NO. 2316 . In order to protect the health and safety of the City and its inhabitants, IT IS ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. It shall hereafter be unlawful for any person to park or leave unattended any motor vehicle along the northwest side of the Skylark Circle within 100 feet of the southwest curb line of Meadow Lakes Drive where it intersects with Skylark Circle nearest the Iron Horse Golf Course Clubhouse. 2. It is ordained that the appropriate NO PARKING ANYTIME signs shall be installed upon the right-of-way of the above public street giving the public notice of this parking regulation. 3. Any person violating any portion of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and fined no in excess of $200.00. 4. . This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 13th day of July, 1998. APPROVED: Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City . \ ./ - ./ TR .2'Â2 / . / / I / - - - _ _ _ --L _ _ _'_ _ _ _ _ 1 " :::::- 2DO I I / / . -......¡ . / . ./ . 1-' I I I I I \ \ TR 18 1 .89-4 AC ----Jii! ~ ~ .... > If1J 0.190 ~ ~QfJ~ ~vf.!tf/ (f ~AC uYL;t ~~ 5.92 AC) . .. ~ I - I _ I . . !! CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Legal/Information Services Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Subject: Approval of Intertocal Agreement with BISD on Fiber Project - Resolution No. 98-28 Agenda Number: GN 98-72 This Resolution authorizes the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Agreement with Birdville Independent School District whereby the City is trading four fiber optic strands for the necessary right to build our fiber network across the Richland High School property. This agreement is compatible with the Council goals for 2008. Specifically,5.(e) "Strong support and partnership with the community." The agreement will potentially save BISD in excess of $100,000 and the granting of this right to use their property would save NRH approximately $35,000. This agreement is a winlwin situation for BISD, NRH and the taxpayers. As BISD and NRH both have the need to build similar networks, it is hoped that this opportunity can be repeated in the future where BISD can exchange fiber from their network for use of City property. Recommendation: Approve passage of Resolution No. 98-28. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaDle ~ ~ Finance Director ~.~~~ Page 1 of 1 . . e RESOLUTION NO. 98-28 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The Mayor be, and is hereby, authorized to execute the attached Interlocal Agreement between the City and Birdville Independent School District concerning installation of a fiber optics system as the act and deed of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th day of July, 1998. APPROVED: Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY; Rex McEntire, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: \~ IJ~-~ Terry Kin Ie, Director nformation Services e INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas has entered into a contract with MICA Corporation to install a fiber optics system within the next few months, and; Whereas, the Birdville Independent School District would be benefited by access to fiber optic strands within the fiber system, and the City of North Richland Hills would be benefited by receiving the right to install and maintain the fiber within the Birdville Independent School District. NOW THEREFORE, since both entities would be benefited by the fiber optics system, the said City of North Richland Hills (NRH) and Birdville Independent School District (BISD) hereby enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the following rights and obligations: 1. NRH will install the 4-inch conduit with 24-strands of fiber optic cable across the BISD Richland High School property at no cost to BISD. 2. NRH will give BISD 4 strands of the 24-strand cable for their use after written acceptance of the installation is given by NRH. This will be strands numbered 21 through 24, inclusive. BISD will maintain these strands. . 3. NRH will be responsible for providing all line locates on the BISD property for this fiber installation. 4. NRH will furnish BISD with a copy of the as-built plans for the fiber located on their property after construction is complete. 5. NRH will be responsible for all repair costs when service is interrupted as a direct result of acts caused by NRH or their agents. NRH will manage and administer all work to repair any damages. 6. NRH will be responsible for all costs associated with any future relocation of the conduit and cable if the relocation is initiated by NRH. 7. BISD will grant NRH the right to install and maintain the 4-inch conduit on the Richland High School property approximately three feet deep along the alignment shown on Exhibit "A" of this agreement. 8. BISD or its agents will not construct any building or concrete slab within five feet horizontally of the fiber conduit without notifying NRH's City Manager in writing and getting NRH concurrence in writing. . . 9. BISO or its agents will request the line be located before they dig in the general area of the fiber conduit. BISO will allow 24 hours for the locates unless an emergency exists, then they will notify NRH Police Oispatch after hours at 281-1000 and request the NRH Public Works Utility Department be contacted as soon as possible. 10. BISD will make every reasonable attempt to protect the fiber Conduit and cable. 11. NRH will make every reasonable attempt to protect the fiber conduit and cable. 12. BISO will be responsible for all repair costs when service is interrupted as a direct result of acts caused by BISO or their agents. NRH will manage and administer all work to repair the damage. 13. BISO will be responsible for all costs associated with any future relocation of the fiber conduit and cable if the relocation is initiated by BISO. NRH will manage and administer all work to relocate the conduit and cable. . 14. NRH and BISO will be responsible for their proportionate share of the repair costs based on number of strands if service is interrupted as a result of an act of God. NRH will manage and administer all work to repair the damage. 15. BISO will allow NRH or its agents to dig on the Richland High School property to maintain the fiber conduit and cable. 16. NRH will notify the BISO administration at least one hour prior to entering the Richland High School property to excavate for the purpose of exposing and/or repairing the fiber conduit and cable. In case of an after hours emergency, NRH will notify the appropriate BISD representative. NRH is selling BISO 4 strands of fiber to use as they please and when they please. BISO is selling NRH easement rights for approximately 3,530 feet along the proposed alignment shown on Exhibit" A" to install and maintain the fiber conduit. Neither NRH nor BISO request any monetary compensation for this transaction. It is understood by both parties to this agreement that NRH is not providing any telecommunications services to BISD or the public by this transaction. e It SIGNED this day of ,1998. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS BY: Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary . APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAILlTY: Rex McEntire, City Attorney BIRDVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BY: Superintendent APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY: Attorney for Birdville Independent School District e e Bob E. Griggs. Ed.D. Superintendent - . IISQ Birdville Independent School District 6125 East Belknap' Haltom City. Texas 76117·817-831-5700· Fax 817-838-7261. httpJ/www.birdville.kI2.bc.us May 15, 1998 Mr. Terry Kinzie Director, Information Services City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 Dear Mr. Kinzie: Please accept this communication as a "Letter of Agreement" between the City of North Richland Hills and the Birdville Independent School District. The City has proposed a project to connect the city offices to the city library and the fire academy with fiber optic cable. In the course of completing this project, the City has requested right-of-way through the Richland High School campus. The District is pleased to grant this request for right-of-way (as defined and plotted in a meeting between city officials and Mr. Bill Cypert and Mr. Roger Courtney of the District). The District is thankful for the offer of two access points (located in the main high school building and in the field house) on the Richland High School campus and the use of two strands of the fiber to be laid in this and future projects in exchange for this right-of-way. The District feels that this cooperative effort is an excellent example of efficient and effective use of public funding to accomplish the goals of both organizations while providing a higher level of quality service to the citizens of the City and the children of the District. We look forward to future opportunities of this nature and view quite favorably the spirit of cooperation in our relationship. If we may answer additional questions on this or other matters of mutual importance, please contact us at your convenience. Thank you. Respectfull y, ø- Dr. Pat Smith Associate Superintendent for Finance c. Dr. Bob Griggs Mr. Toby Howard Mr. Bill Cypert -'I 'I . .. . -....--.... -- .. 0_. ___.... - " LEGE.NO .' \;~: ..;f3~::'" rT1 :.} - ~ -t ~ '.' 1 . ' [:,..,... ..~.' . .~... .' .....~-' : .. .... 't .~ ~." ': :I(it"':;.·'~ ~." \.~~~ ',.,. :.~~,...,. ~.(. .'- . \ ..'t.'!:...~... 4Q=;,'J¡, ! ~>~,.ø< \~:::;~ /.,/ .' ~ ; .····1 ,. Ø"/ ' ... ,~ ~~ 'i;¡ .....-:: /,."",," " ~ ~./ ...---:~, 1-;. . ,'. . . .... :~ ~"'f.1.,. ....~ .:~, /" // .:~., ".i~~.\."y~ '&£I; .. ---<.'~../ ..\.~~,.y....,~, -- ~'r- ...... :-f¡.I~: /..... ~....~........ ~~' ~.-..... \'. _. -; i ,.. ./ ,..... I I /" ./" '. ..~A .' ,/ ./ '\ - j~I¡. , /lï ~,I;. ' ¿1 . . ../--::::;:;:;-.',-..: .~!.~.. ,~'Ð:~r:R:b\':I:,=P.-Å~K~'B.I;;-V-Ðr.-" ~~ I~~,nm:~ - _;~-- :1: .- . -c- 'u ~_ / ":(..' . .t-~ ii¡iiih.__,..,.~..,... r' I ~.. =-, ¡.: ,:,,: ' ~...., ;,!.. .\ 1':II.:ro: c; ,'.',";',;:.L':I,;,:, : i' '____ ' : ',_ ::r.. ¡'¡ :~. , I, . 1: . .... 1 ~"',..,.-' ' . r i -J- 'I r.: ""- . . ':u . ..~....- '~~';:"-"::-""--S1£.ai~'A""9'1t';"~·' ,.". . ,,~. . 8'..:nfo;-ø·$i·~R':r·':'...._. -ok" ". 'õ' .... ..,!:' " ...~~:, ....... .. .,._. 'b «i.,.J.~ '. . ·~t,-'t'.:""" . ,---,¡í=-=-t!::j.'---i :!;j : . '. ¡.. ',' '.i '" 6" '~ ~ :." -I -I '. '\ : . « ~....-¡ ~'''''''. ~ ~ '. .;""'",' ~\:' .. - , ~~.: ~ .:' ~~~\...~ AM"""~~'"" ~I_I.· : --..... ~ 1~~·." ~~., ':~,;..-. ~·;·~.L·.8ii~ .' -;...."..~~: ~ ' d',"'" \. IeI' \~ - ~\;.. , .. I ~ 2: ':' ~3i~ ~1t. . t· !. :)t 'i' ~U;\:;.,· ~¡;\',,;. ~:, ¡~ ---=":.¡ '. '.;--1.. 'I' \. \~. .:;'" '....... - '~~;.....~ ~}'Y.I -7.-':"·~X·- ---"~'..' ......~ '1 i....-· .,' .:...:1.- ---;.:.r-.::...:.....:. '--.II . .4i<.. -' ... ::-r '." .4.... . -,-_to .,~;.. .'_ .~~H.,.... ,...,;. ~~"'~~~ ~_'.J.. - :~ :":;-~~-V· .' ,",~.~\".~-. ~J 4 ~t- t ~ ,', . "\...1' .\.:~' !-:-. r:J.. . I " /''/ " ~. : " ~ .: ~:~:t: ~'. ~t . -~;r' ·"i~ '>~"" -,~'. >~,.,(:~{/.,~~-,: !~~~. _5' .. --I~t "\1 -., '-, .:,_t:'~. ,~. . '7~/" ,¡."..'. ..~,; ··,f't :..' '¡: ~.,: ¡: ~~, . '. 'l:,.' l \ '* .7·-=-À-. ....,...,/ . i-:J. .' l' - , . . LN I'Ð'A Q 'D-R-~ . ...; "'..-' r'-:::<; -r. I ,- .~_. .."";!i: ,.¡. :J.! ,',. .;. " .J';- '" .oJ' _. ~ - ....-. ~~t .... ".: ..,. . ... r I.~.'· . ~. Ii" ~~ .~~~----¡::-- ¡. ¡=--.fIIt" - G -: Ð .... .----1-;-- 'T ."~: . ·1·1~... r"'" .. \..~', ,,""~ . " ~ ..~-' - L' ,.~ ~- "."\' I J:' .~,..-- ., , .,.. . .-: .11,. '''\.' ~ .. .~' '- -.,': I ::. " ',' ., ~1t::~' ~"'i "'-": .. :.;,0; /. ' ...' .; ,:::}-,,~ " .~ '. ïr . . r~ ;'s. ~irrN"'~. ~~ -~~ . ,'. ~~: --= ....<-'", "- .' .,~ - . .......... ..~".... "'.. , -." I. ~., . '..... . .,,'.'" J!f.' '. ··9=----- / "/"" -., _. ,~, J ... . .- I ~ 1 ~ - . '~...' \.~. ' ..". . ~--'. . if' l' 'I~' , ,,,,, , .~ ./ r ~"/..,, ../ ' Il ~~ ~ I;(~~., ~. . ~ t~ " 'T'! . . /".( /', \,~:~, <~.~",.. . ~- ~, - . ----,~~. ~L, '. >---;-._ ~\ '~e;-<f __. '. '-~~*_ .... . - i!:.o ~" 'C .." ~, ")i:''''- r :c;;.'" . -- !'êa"'-f";' ~:~.~~---,--~~~' . ~ ',',~. ~':!:.,.". ¡..- ., --.:" 1 ì "'-:-~i"~-"~ - /" L ~." ~;;" .;' ; . '. I : ,. ~ ;~: ,~ ~ '~ /.~, '\-. r"':~"- '" . .' 'I ,.i. .', '71'" .'. ........... .......... ... ... ,.\ ~ ~:-.---l ~-- .......- .,'" ......,....c-<'" .. . :-.. -" =4----;-'\1' ~., 1 ~ .'~' ~v~~t~ '. ·~·!..:·I ~~' . ...'=:0:-." t ,-.,,~-. Ii f -,_',~_."'.__:-,.::;_.,_.--:.--.-~..........IUi~... s ij.~¡'5 EI-"'"' :-:-:t . I" ""I I .I.~ ,"". ¡- . . . .. ~ .' ~~ ~ . '\3~' I ~~ : ~: \! "<~_.. .'i, " ~:.., . I> __ I ~ '~l:,;;;o::,¡,.. '/It '.... ~~.~- I -~.-_.'; _' .. ,. .-...¡....-.~~..~...,.:. . ~ ",,!: ~. ... !" ; '"""t. ,. . · -~ ~~ ' ... .....'IÞ<i'.. ¡~ ," t. t-" '.', '" i - :- ~; Ii' i ' .' .;~'.': '. " .. I' I ), I. fl.' '---- ~ i? ..~ '-- --- T u, _-_ ~b"ºO.'1_~~of;\. ~ . f, 1:' /,,__. .' \1' : ~' . _. ". ~.J. ': ~, '1'_~ . Þ...... _. \,t.· _~..I. .' .Itr,,; --__ .. """...- ,-- _~.1_=-- '. .. . '""---.,..-.; - Ai· ;:;--..-- ,.,¡ .. - ... ....~ , -c-:-- .... ....,... -.,.........".:_ . ~-.~'"!Ii~~ .-----;! "I .: 't ....... ;,' .... ~ :: '" ~ '1~\Í ,,:; ~' .. .h· .:\.:..;~, '.~ ,_ ........ ,~ 1 iz: ~_!. ;~~: .. ~.' :_: ~,~ ~ S ...¡ I¡}_::.' :.i t~;:::.. 'I. ¡ -'0' If!. ; ~"~pO f~"'1 '~~.! ¡'Pi¡! '.~"- .<"" ~_~~ ~Ao-O'W"," ,. .;:&... '----- ~~ .,., - .. ~ ...,,~ SlV ~"'~. ., ~ L ~. .,~.~. :'V . .t.""".., . 62"} . ...- ".- '.--..:... . t,j.· , ;;JIi..Þ ~ . . .o~ I -!""', 101,),.··0 < _,' ......Coot. , . ,- .. ; 1 '... l' . . , >1 J.: '-<,", ..v.'----~'" ... ' . : . . .. _ ....... '. . . ~¡ i . '0' . ."",.:! z . ,<..... . ~ <........... . Ioo4tAOOWCR£ST .OR~ _,-.. . 'I~· . ,:f... .¡.~ i-' Þ' .-- .. '....... / "^. :' ..,)1' r.. X. . ~. _:::' ~ :w"j.-_ ........" ' _'.. . '-(: f I t"' .=, ->, 0.. . .. :-~ '0 .,.... - .=- .:. ~ .þ. . ~'''<q' .~._' .,.. .. !~. ~,'...- , ....-~:'í.. ,..,/':-. ~ëf' :' :!; ~-'''~''''.'. r~"__'" . '~i-:~~- : ,.;..~~.~~' . .....>..':~, T,~~o; - :'.' ~,^,:-~.;q!1) {~.,: ...'/.:.~i.,..J'4· ,:':¡'1,.?! ~ : .r! ~,...,: ~I· . ..... : 'J; ~ .,..~.,~......, J'-#',.-" ..... ~,' . . ' '.'.16,. ~;... ,:, .'~". . ~'. ,....Å.. , ,~', ..".~._ . .' ;",' " " ~i~ '5!: - r .;::-;~¡ . /"- /', -~ '~::" " .-' ,.,'., ',...!~; ~r-:¡f";¡ . _;¡~ ~' ,"':."....Þ _< ':--'.---- /' ~..., . ~...~l.u":1' ( '.~ - . .... y..... ,,--- ..' .. ,I 't.-.,'w; ~ ~ ' -'j. ., ",-- ".¿-' // "." "",' ~ ,."Z :~,~~ ¡.. .1. -~.: '. .., .... ~ . ...... ,."...r-- -':...' .0/-1 ~:Jï.. ~' :'. . ~''"--' ,., -R' ..~.- I...'" ,.... . -.'-' ='1,".-,'-:< Ùw.1i!f;;~-"~:~;:r'l '7 ~ ~., '-.' }"';' I ...::; ~ .~~ :~!~.f~ .' ' !) - [,t~ ~:I~"l:~;j~.~..;..."':::;' ",'î :"~'-.::"'. "., :.- --..,....: ... ~ .,/'/ ~........;~ . a'.,..; " ''',' ,/ _ ,.." ~..J. , ;,f,' ", '..' L '\;"4· .... .. -.,~ ø-:oC:"· : ~ ¡"f'~~~'~/' ' ]~ ,~~ !.- - ~;,~: n~ ,-,'M&~~ ~' ~~-',~ ~~~~'. "L" i-I ' ;,k::.";'/ ~. -':;:'< ¡X.~~~). '~-Ë;t¡~.i.'T; . '" ':~-~I1~:q ,.--- 1 ',: r.-Y":'~~..-'_..... : (ßI .~,.~'~,œ:_" "'__~" "', :,-~". . ':~"_l~' ~ 1 ..:,: t!....i~ :~; _~.~ . .,., : 'I. _~. -: _ ... .. ,. ..! \ .._ TRENC.HING . Bo Rn,,¡ Go MANHOLE. f .. . .~ p PuLL BOX ", "", ... . - iF..' ~r ....... "'fIt~..!__} f --.Q ~ ...... ~.... ..~ '. -:... ~ ............:~---_. ., .,~ '....'-..q' -~ .,~., -~ .~~" ,.~-; -:-~....¡ " / I / ~ , ~,' / ì \ ~ H (. i ~ ~ \' _.-~-~_.! ---...... ~...J...:..--~ -- I' .----. .. r r ~f ~. ,.~ ---.... &",",>' ~.... ..1~. ..Ä-o'" , ~ ..-< . Z ~-~o -- . " t ~ t, :q .~~ '. , " .., ............r:.r,. '. '.....¿ 'J: ,,-ZR¿t~ I ; . ~ .....-,--f --.----: ------ ,,:. ,./. .:a.-~ '.. ... _ ~~RsÍ\ ~~. . !.~- tf1~.r . , "".-I0"'JlC' ..... ~ . -' ~.7.' . . ~,~", /.:~~.. ,<,.:.- 0- ,.;~ - . . , " ,._~_.. 0". {~~'3" -~.,. . -~ 8 .''';.'<=,,_?,..--t 'c·;. "-'5" " '-'}- > >--:'~-, '<I _ ..'~- .- . ~-'. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS {¡;¿ Subject: . Council Meeting Date: 07/13/98 Agenda Number: GN 98-73 Department: The City is in the process of applying for the 1998 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant. One of the requirements of the Grant application is the City Council's formal approval to apply. If awarded the Grant will provide $39,873.00 for two vehicles for the Criminal Investigations Division. The City's matching amount will be $4,430.00. These funds are available from the Federal and State forfeiture monies. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 98-27 . Finance Review Dep rtment Head Signature , CITY COUNCIL ACTION t'l5-8010-531.74-10 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other _... OlredO< Page 1 of . . . RESOLUTION NO. 98 - 27 WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills possesses legal authority to apply for the 1998 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant; NOW, THEREFORE: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, THAT the filing of the application for the 1998 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant is hereby authorized and that Assistant Chief John Lynn act as the official representative of the City in connection with the Grant application. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this the 13th day of July, 1998 APPROVED: Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (ß-P Planning & Inspections Department: Council Meeting Date: . Amendment to Ordinance No. 2304 Regarding Training of Agenda Number: SubJect: Ooard and COIIII,1Ìssioll Melllbel ~ Ouliw:lllt;t:: No. 2315 7/13/98 GN 98-74 At the June 23, 1998 Pre-Council meeting, discussion was held regarding a requirement for training and continuing education for members of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Zoning Board of Adjustment. The requirement for mandatory training of P& Z Commissioners and ZBA Board members will require amendment of Ordinance 2304, adopted by the City Council May 11, 1998. Attached is a proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 2304 which establishes a requirement for each Planning and Zoning Commissioner and ZBA member to attend one regional or statewide training session during their two year term and for staff to provide an annual "in-house" training session on the functions of their appointed position. The following paragraphs show deleted text as "strikethrough" and inserted text as "bold/italics/underlined". Paragraph 16 of Ordinance 2304 is proposed to be amended to read as follows: "Immediately following the appointment process in July of each year, the staff person providing support for each Board is charged with the duty to familiarize each board member with the functions of that Board. Following the July appointment process, the first meeting of each Board shall accommodate an orientation period, which shall be set aside for the purpose of helping members become more nowledgeable about his particular Board, aM its functions, state or city laws or rules affectinQ the Board". A new paragraph 17 is being inserted to read as follows: "ThoGO porE:onG Gorving upon Members of the Zoning Board of Adjustment and the Planning and Zoning Commission will shall be (roquirod/oncour3god) required to attend a proscribod minimum of one reQional or statewide training program durinQ each two year term, which is designed to educate members in the functions of those boards. The City shall bear the expense of this training for board members. The training program shall be designated by the Director of Planning with approval of the City Manager. Staff shall conduct an annual traininQ session for the PlanninQ and ZoninQ Commission and the ZoninQ Board of Adjustment, which shall also be mandatory for all respective board members, which shall also be mandatory for all respective board members. " RECOMMENDATION: That Ordinance 2315 be approved. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget eOt er Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ Fin..."'" 01r0<:1"; ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of . ORDINANCE NO. 2315 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2304 REGARDING REQUIRED TRAINING FOR THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: I. THAT, Ordinance Number 2304, Section 16, is hereby amended to read as follows: 16. . Immediately following the appointment process in July of each year, the staff person providing support for each Board is charged with the duty to familiarize each board member with the functions of that Board. Following the July appointment process, the first meeting of each Board shall accommodate an orientation period, which shall be set aside for the purpose of helping members become more knowledgeable about his particular Board, its functions, state or city laws or rules affecting the Board. II. THAT, Ordinance Number 2304, is hereby amended to insert a new Paragraph 17 to read as follows: 17. Members of the Board of Adjustment and the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be required to attend a minimum of one regional or statewide training program during each two year term, which is designed to educate members in the functions of those boards. The City shall bear the expense of this training for board members. The training program shall be designated by the City Manager and approved by the City Council. Staff shall conduct an annual training session for the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Zoning Board of Adjustment, which shall also be mandatory for all respective board members. III. THAT, Ordinance Number 2304, Paragraph 17 is renumbered to Paragraph 18. - Ord.2315 Page 1 . IV. . SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. V. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. PASSED, AND APPROVED this 13th day of July, 1998. APPROVED: MAYOR . ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: í3 /1) tlMM ;~ IJ~- DEPARTM~NT HEAD APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTORNEY - Ord.2315 Page 2 - . . Item 6F (revised) ORDINANCE NO. 2315 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2304 REGARDING REQUIRED TRAINING FOR THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: I. THAT, Ordinance Number 2304, Section 16, is hereby amended to read as follows: 16. Immediately following the appointment process in July of each year, the staff person providing support for each Board is charged with the duty to familiarize each board member with the functions of that Board. Following the July appointment process, the first meeting of each Board shall accommodate an orientation period, which shall be set aside for the purpose of helping members become more knowledgeable about his particular Board, its functions, state or city laws or rules affecting the Board. II. THAT, Ordinance Number 2304, is hereby amended to insert a new Paragraph 17 to read as follows: 17. Members of the Board of Adjustment and the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be required to attend a minimum of one regional or statewide training program during each two year term, which is designed to educate members in the functions of those boards. The City shall bear the direct expense of this training for board members. The training program shall be designated by the City Manager and approved by the City Council. Staff shall conduct an annual training session for the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Zoning Board of Adjustment, which shall also be mandatory for all respective board members. III. THAT, Ordinance Number 2304, Paragraph 17 is renumbered to Paragraph 18. -- Ord.2315 Page 1 IV. . SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. V. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. PASSED, AND APPROVED this 13th day of July, 1998. APPROVED: MAYOR e ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: DEPARTMENT HEAD APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTORNEY - Ord.2315 Page 2 - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ¿(/:¡- I " Department: Finance/Support Services Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Subject: Award Bid for Recreation Center HVAC Replacement to Agenda Number: PU 98-49 Freer Mechanical in the Amount of $330,318 · In the 1997/98 CIP Budget, the City Council approved the "Recreation Center HVAC Replacement The existing system has passed its estimated life cycle by nearly five years and is in constant need of repair. · The system was not designed for the uses and activities (Aerobics, Karate, Meetings, Fitness Workout Rooms, etc.) that take place in the Rec. Center. The system is not "zoned" so that the different activities in various rooms can accommodate the demands. Not only are we not able to provide adequate service to the various needs, the system is very inefficient. · The new system will be energy efficient (our design engineers estimate a conservative savings of $4,000 per year) and will include a centralized computer controlled program with multiple zone capacity so that the air temperature in individual rooms and major areas can be regulated to accommodate specific functions and maximize energy conservation. · Design of a system of this size and specifications (to retrofit an existing building) is a custom job. The design contract was awarded to the specialty-engineering firm of Romine, Romine & Burgess, Inc. who began work in October 1997. · Timing on this project is critical. We have been working with the design engineers and staff to get this project out for bid and awarded so that we can schedule installation during the "cooler seasonal months" this fall in order to have the least negative impact on our employees and customers. Installation of the system means taking the existing system out of service. While we do plan to furnish fans for air circulation and to enhance the comfort of our customers, there will be a period of time when the building will not have HVAC in operation. Construction is expected to commence on August 31 and be completed by December 31, 1998. · In order to meet this schedule the system must be ordered, fabricated, and delivered in time to meet this construction schedule. · In order to get as many competitive bids as possible staff solicited information for the design engineers to obtain the names of contractors qualified to do this type of construction. We advertised in the Star Telegram, mailed notices to eight qualified contractors, & sent a notice and copy of the plans to the "Texas Contractor Plan Room". · We received two very good bids meeting our requirements: 1. Freer Mechanical Contractors $330,318 92 days to complete 2. Walker Mechanical $340,600 93 days to complete Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ .Oth r Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available e CITY COUNCIL ACTION FII\8IIOI Director Page 1 of . CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS . . In order to determine why we received only two bids staff contacted eleven contractors, five of which had picked up bid spec's. The majority replied that they did not bid because they already had too much business; one indicated that after reviewing the bid spec's he realized that he was not qualified to take on the job; one indicated that their company did not want to supply the required Performance and Payment Bonds; and three did not respond to our calls. . Freer Mechanical Contractors met all the requirements of the bid. They have performed work for the City in the past and have completed projects on time and within budget. Recommendation: The bid for the Recreation Center HVAC Replacement project be awarded to the lowest qualified bidder, Freer Mechanical Contractors, in the amount of $330,318. . I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM P",,.,p ,.,f - ¿þl~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Department: Finance / Support Services Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Subject: Authorization to Participate in the City of Fort Worth Agenda Number: PU 98- 50 Cooperative Purchasing Program for the Purchase of Fuel In the 1997/98 approved budget, Council appropriated $180,000 for the purchase of gasoline, diesel fuel and propane. The City of Fort Worth maintains a cooperative purchasing program that includes contracts with Direct Fuels for gasoline and Lucky Lady Oil Company for diesel. The City may take advantage of cost savings by entering into an interlocal agreement with Fort Worth to participate in this contract. The cost of fuel is determined by obtaining the daily price of fuel from the Oil Price Information Service (OPIS) and adding the vendor's fee of .0050 per gallon for gasoline and .0165 for diesel. The Local Government Code states that purchases made under a cooperative purchasing program satisfies any State law that would require the City to solicit competitive bids. Participation in the program will be cost effective to the City as well as save Staff time. Recommendation: To authorize Staff to execute the interlocal agreement with the City of Fort Worth for participation in the Cooperative Purchasing Program for the purchase of gasoline and diesel fuels. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ (Jtlher ~ ~ ~æ ~ Department Head Signature Account Number 510-7032-722.62-20 Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director Page 1 of ~ . . . CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NUMBER INTERLOCAL GOVERNMENTAL CONTRACT FOR PURCHASING CITY OF FORT WORTH AND CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS This contract is made and entered this ~day of July. 1998 by and between the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, a governmental agency, (hereinafter referred to as NRH), acting by and through its duly authorized , and the City of Fort Worth, (hereinafter referred to as Fort Worth) acting by and through Charles Boswell, its duly authorized Assistant City Manager. WHEREAS, NBti and Fort Worth (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "parties" or either "party") are political subdivisions of the State of Texas authorized to contract with each other relative to governmental functions and services by the Interlocal Cooperating Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 791; and WHEREAS, the parties believe that cooperating in the purchasing of various goods, materials, equipment and supplies which both parties use in carrying out their governmental functions and services will enable the parties to obtain these goods, materials, equipment and supplies in better terms and/or prices than by making such purchases individually, and both desire to increase efficiency and effectiveness of such purchasing by acting joint in competitively procuring selected goods, materials, equipment and supplies. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. AGREEMENT This contract shall be for a term of one (1) year beginning on July 13. 1998. and ending on July 12. 1999. This Contract shall automatically renew for one (1) year terms thereafter unless one party gives written notice to the other party of its desire not to renew. The written notice required shall be at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of an existing one year term. 2. SCOPE AND IMPLEMENTATION It is the intent of the parties that the joint or cooperative purchasing through each other's contracts will be as broad as is allowed by applicable state statutes. Unless otherwise prevented by law, it is the intent of the parties that the two may take part in joint purchases for 1 . . . any goods and services they may need to carry out their governmental functions, and that either one will use reasonable efforts to allow the other to make purchases under its contracts. In each instance, however, there shall be a "purchasing agreement" or "purchase order" issued by the entity desiring to make the purchase, and agreed to or countersigned by the entity having the contract with the supplier of goods or services, or which is the lead entity in that contract, which purchasing agreement or purchase order shall specify the supply contract in question and set out any and all terms and conditions appropriate to such joint purchase. The purchasing agreement or purchase order shall be acknowledged by the supplier and shall be considered as being issued under this agreement and shall be subject to all of the terms and conditions of this agreement without the necessity of those being set out or specifically referred to in such purchasing agreement or purchase order. 3. COMPENSATION The parties agree to share the cost of the respective joint solicitations in a fair and equitable manner, to be agreed upon in connection with each such solicitation. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The parties hereby agree to abide by and obey all applicable local, state and federal laws and requirements, which apply to their respective procurement policies. It is specifically understood and agreed that whichever party is handling the preparation and processing of the joint invitations for bid shall comply with all legal requirements for competitive bidding which are applicable to both parties. 5. NOTICES Any notices or other communication required or allowed to be given by one party to the other pursuant to this Contract shall be hand delivered or mailed by the United States Postal Service, proper postage affixed to the addresses shown below: To City of Fort Worth: Purchasing Manager City of Fort Worth 1000 Throckmorton Fort Worth, Texas 76102 To City of North Richland Hills Purchasing Agent P.O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182 2 . . . 6. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE This contract shall be governed by and interpreted on accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. This contract is entered into and is to be performed, wholly, or in part, in the State of Texas and in Tarrant County, Texas. In any action brought under the contract, venue shall be exclusively in Tarrant County, Texas. In the event thàt any portion of this contract shall be found to be contrary to law, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining portions shall remain valid and in full force and effect to the extent possible. 7. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS By execution of this contract, each party represents to the other that: A. In performing its duties and obligations hereunder, it will be carrying out one or more governmental functions or services which it is authorized to perform; B. The undersigned officer or agent of the party has been properly authorized by that part's governing body to execute this contract and that any necessary resolutions extending such authority have been duly passed and are now in effect; C. All payments required or permitted to be made by a party will be made from current revenues available to the paying party; and D. All payments provided at be hereunder by one party to the other shall be such amounts as to fairly compensate the other party for the services or functions performed hereunder. 8. CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT This contract represents the full, final and complete agreement of the parties related to its subject matter and may not be added to, contradicted or otherwise modified by evidence of prior or contemporaneous agreement or subsequent oral agreements or statements of either of the parties, nor by any writing not signed by both parties after the date of this contract. No representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, oral or otherwise, embodied or incorporated herein shall be of any force or effect. In case if any apparent ambiguity or conflict among any of the terms or provisions of this contract, they shall be construed as nearly as possible as to effectuate each and all of such terms or provisions keeping in mind that the overriding purpose of this contract is the public purpose of increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the respective purchases of goods, materials, equipment and supplies by the parties. 3 . . . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this contract on this date, the day of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Larry J. Cunningham City Manager ATTEST: BY: Patricia Hutson City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY By: Rex McEntire Attorney for the City ,1998. CITY OF FORT WORTH By: Bob Terrell City Manager ATTEST: By: NAME: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY By: NAME: Asst. City Attorney 4 Ú,( CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Support Services Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Subject: Authorize Interlocal Agreement with the City of Haltom City Agenda Number: PU 98- 51 For the Purchase of a Gradall Excavator from AIS Continental In the Amount of $199,808 In the 1997/98 CIP budget, Council appropriated funds for the purchase of a new excavator to be used by the Public Works Department. The new excavator will replace equipment that was purchased in 1986. The City of Haltom City solicited formal bids for a new excavator and awarded the bid to AIS Continental for a Gradall 41 OOXL excavator. AIS has agreed to extend the same bid price to the City. Since Haltom City awarded the bid there has been a three- percent increase in the price of the Gradall excavator. Purchasing the equipment through the Haltom City bid will save the City approximately $6,549. AIS Continental also offered the City $20,549 for trade-in of the current equipment. This will make the total purchase price $199,808. Recommendation: Authorize Staff to execute an interlocal agreement with the City of Haltom City and authorize the purchase of a Gradall excavator from AIS Continental in the amount of $199,808 Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating BUdget{2 Other JJ-- ~J!j~ Department Head Signature Account Number 310-0000-601.79-00 Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director Paqe 1 of ~ . . . INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF HALTOM CITY AND CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS This agreement is made this day of July, 1998, by and between the City of North Richland Hills and the City of Haltom City, Tarrant County, State of Texas. Pursuant to the authority granted by the Texas Interlocal Cooperation Act {Article 4413 (32c) Vernon's Annotated Texas Statutes} providing for the cooperation between local governmental bodies, the parties hereto, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises contained herein, agree as follows: I. The above listed City of North Richland Hills, hereinafter referred to as Member, makes, constitutes and appoints the City of Haltom City as its true and lawful purchasing agent for the purchase of selected goods and products through the Cities' Cooperative Purchasing Program. Member agrees that the City of Haltom City shall serve as the purchasing agent for said items, and agrees that the bidding shall be conducted by the City of Haltom City according to its usual bidding procedures. II. Member agrees that all specifications for said items should be determined in cooperation with Member, with the final approval by the City of Haltom City. I II. Each Member shall be responsible for placing orders directly with and payment directly to the Vendor under each contract entered into pursuant to the cooperative purchasing program, and shall be responsible for the Vendor's compliance with all conditions of delivery and quality of the purchased items. No member shall be obligated to purchase any item merely by virtue of that member approving specifications for said item, or by requesting to be included in an "open" contract for such items. IV. Member shall designate Donna Hurst Enos, Purchasing Agent, as the official representative to act for the Member in all matters relating to this cooperative purchasing program, including the designation of specific contracts in which the Member desires to participate. .,- . . . V. This agreement shall take effect upon execution by the signatories. VI. This agreement shall be in effect from the date of execution until terminated by either party to the agreement by written notice to the other party stating the date of such termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their authorized officers the day and year first written above. CITY OF HALTOM CITY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY: BY: TITLE: TITLE: DATE: DATE: Approved As To Form: BY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City TITLE: - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND 'HI!-L5. Subject: Agenda Number: 07/13/98 PAY 98-03 Support Services Department: Council Meeting Date: The Police Property and Evidence Building is complete and Speed Fab-Crete has requested final payment. The total contract amount of $385,377 includes the original contract for $345,150, Change Order No.1 for $39,269 (PU 98-17) and Change Order No.2 for $958. Change Order NO.1 was for the Crime Scene labs and ventilation systems not included in the original bid pending new guidelines. Change Order No.2 was for using apoxy paint on the lab floors instead of clear sealer. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council approve the final payment for the Police Property and Evidence Building to Speed Fab-Crete in the amount of $56,359.02. Finance Review Source of Funds: ~onds (GO/Rev.) _ ~perating B dget _ Other _ Acct. Number 20-80-01-6000 Sufficient Funds Available ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION Fln..,cë DlreC10f Page 1 of 1 1 - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Support Services Department: Council Meeting Date: 07/13/98 Subject: Final Payment to Pete Durant and Associates for the Support Services Building Agenda Number: PAY 98-04 The Support Services Building is complete and Pete Durant and Associates, Inc. has requested the final payment. The total contract amount of $739,172 includes Change Order No. 1 for $4,872. Change Order No.1 was for additional sidewalk work required by Texas Accessibility Standards to connect the Support Services Building with Fire Station No.4 and for using apoxy paint on the interior block walls. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council approve the final payment for the Support Services Building to Pete Durant and Associates in the amount of $52,889. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ____ Aoperating dget____ ""Other ____ Acct. Number 20-80-04-6000 Sufficient Funds Available Departmen Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Flnance- Dlrecto; Page 1 of 1 ... - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS r Planning & Inspections Co 7/13/98 uncil Meeting Date: '52enda Number: PZ 98-15 t1 0 dependent change request. Mr. Stefoniak ent for an independent living en the Waterford on the Green he proposed development will ining room and restaurant style or citizens who are able to live uth are zoned R-7 Multi-family. across Glenview Drive, is zoned e as follows: a minimum dwelling unit size in r a waiver of the dwelling unit feet. Of the 120 units unit proposed is 297 square Code. This Code states that e developer is proposing to allowed. n in the following table: rking Spaces Required provide 194 parking spaces. has requested a waiver of spaces, none of which will be nç¡ spaces. vailable Finane" Dlrodo; City Manager Department: . Public Hearing to Consider the Request of WSI Architects Sub¡e<fol a ZOIIÌlI~ Clldll~t::: VII Tldd 3R, M. T,illlule ßurvey, Abstrac From R7MF Multi-family to PD Planned Development for an In Living Facility. (Located in the 6200 Block of Glenview Drive) Ordinance No. 2314 Ed Stefoniak is representing Triad Senior Development in this zoning is requesting a change from R-7 Multi-family to PD Planned Developm facility on the entire 9.3 acre tract of land. This tract is situated betwe Apartments and the Diamond Loch Apartments on Glenview Drive. T contain 120 living units. The development will also have a common d kitchen facility. The development would exclusively rent units to seni on an independent basis. The adjacent properties to the north and so The property to the west is located in Haltom City. Toward the east, R-1 Residential. The issues associated with this rezoning request ar 1. Dwelling Unit Size: The current NRH Zoning Ordinance requires the R-7 MF district of 650 square feet. The developer is askinq fo square footaqe requirements. The proposed average unit size of this development is 504 square proposed, 100 will be smaller than 650 square feet. The smallest feet. The City currently operates under the 1991 Uniform Building the minimum inhabitable dwelling unit size is 296 square feet. Th construct 18 units that are 1 square foot larger than the minimum 2. Parking: The Zoning Ordinance requires parking spaces as show Type of Dwelling Unit No. of Pa Efficiency One Bedroom Unit Two Bedroom Unit or more 1 2 2.5 Based on the information referenced above, the developer should Because this project will serve only senior citizens, the developer parkinq requirements. The developer is proposing to provide 100 covered, whereas the ordinance would require 120 covered parki Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds A ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of - 3. Fencing: The developer is proposing to construct a 6' wooden fence along the north and the south property lines. The developer is proposing a 6' masonry and wrought iron fence along the eastern property line of the property that fronts on Glenview Drive. 4. Elevations: The applicant has provided elevation drawings and an analysis of exterior surface materials. The structures are proposed to be both brick and non-masonry siding. The applicant has provided information regarding the masonry coverage for the different elevations. Elevations facing Glenview Drive have a 77.4% masonry coverage and elevations not facing Glenview Drive have masonry coverage of 63.8%. The combined average masonry coverage for the entire structure is 70.6%. The Ordinance requires that all elevations be at least 65% masonry. Not all elevations conform to this requirement even though the masonry percentage for the overall structure exceeds the requirement. The developer is askinq for a waiver of the requirement that all elevations contain 65% masonry coveraqe. 5. Hours of Operation: The development will operate the dining room and provide housekeeping staff between 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. 6. Building Heights: Due the extensive floodplain on the property resulting from Big Fossil Creek just to the west of the property, the building area is rather limited. Therefore, the developer proposes to construct a facility that is 3 stories in height along the northern most wing of the facility. This northern most wing is the elevation that faces the rear of the property and is adjacent to Big Fossil Creek. 7. Dumpster Screening: The dumpster location is at the rear of the building and is not visible from any public right-of-way. The developer is proposing to screen the dumpster with a 6' masonry wall with wooden gates. 8. Signage: The developer is proposing to construct a 6' externally illuminated monument sign adjacent to Glenview Drive. 9. Access Gate: The developer is not proposing to construct a limited access gate. This is required for all other new multi-family developments in the city. 10. Landscaping: The developer has met the landscaping regulations established by the City. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS - This project is consistent with the NRH Comprehensive Land Use Plan. During the public hearing held by the P&Z, there was considerable discussion about the possibility of these multi-family units reverting back to a traditional apartment project at some time in the future. Some of the members of the P&Z felt that the applicant should file deed restrictions limiting the tenants to persons 55 years of age and older. The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this request for rezoning to a Planned Development for an independent living facility at their June 11, 1998 meeting and recommended approval subject to deed restrictions being filed with the County stating the 11 conditions outlined in Section 3 of the proposed ordinance, and that no one under 55 years of age may be a lessee. Deed restrictions may not be enforced by the City and would thereafter require a civil suit if these restrictions were violated. RECOMMENDATION: To approve the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission provided a deed restriction is filed with the County prior to permits being issued stating the 11 conditions outlined in Section 3 of the Ordinance and adding that no one under 55 years of age may be a lessee and to approve the passage of Ordinance No. 2314. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1 16 6200 OR 6300 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 -0- - - 1- 4 2 ~~ . 6L-E. ,810 '< 0· u8\}t, 0 . S ^ 52 þ-/ j. - e e e ORDINANCE NO. 2314 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AS AMENDED, TO ESTABLISH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed a rezoning request on a tract of land identified in Case Number PZ 98-15; and WHEREAS, the developer has indicated an interest in establishing the proposed development as a planned development district under the guidelines of the North Richland Hills Zoning Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that the development conditions of this tract of land do not provide adequate opportunities for development under available existing zoning district regulations; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874, as amended, by establishing a Planned Development District and by changing said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, in Case Number PZ 98-15, the following described property, attached as Exhibit 1, Location Map, shall be rezoned from R7MF -Multi-family Residential to' . establish a Planned Development District with specific development regulations as herein described: Tract 3R, W. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, (located in the 6200 block of Glenview Drive). Being all that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Cities of North Richland Hills and Haltom City, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a part of the William Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, and also being the same tract of land conveyed to DFW Holding, Inc. by deed dated October 18, 1993 and recorded in Volume 11291, Page 2343, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being more fully described by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning at a 3/8 inch iron rod found in the west line of Glenview Drive, same being the southeast corner of Block 1, Diamond Loch Apartments, an addition to the Cities of North Richland Hills and Haltom City, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in volume 388-123, Page 23, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Ordinance 2314 Page I - e e e Thence, along said west line of Glenview Drive, and along a curve to the right whose radius is 850.20 feet and whose long chord bears South 31 degrees, 57 minutes, 54 seconds East, 98.54 fee and an arc length of 98.60 feet to a Y:z inch iron rod found at the P.T. of said curve; Thence, continuing along said west line of Glenview Drive, South 28 degrees, 38 minutes, 34 seconds, East, 280.88 feet to a Y:z inch iron rod found; Thence South 61 degrees, 29 minutes, 43 seconds West, 98.05 feet, to a 5/8 inch iron rod found; Thence South 36 degrees, 49 minutes, 29 seconds, West, 706.73 feet to a Y:z inch iron rod found; Thence North 53 degrees, 07 minutes, 00 seconds, West, 63.21 feet to a Y:z inch iron rod found; Thence South 61 degrees, 22 minutes, 08 seconds, West, 147.88 feet to a Y:z inch iron rod found; Thence North 33 degrees, 51 minutes, 24 seconds, West, 76.96 feet to a Y:z inch iron rod found; Thence North 32, degrees, 56 minutes, 31 seconds, East, 76.73 feet to a Y:z inch iron rod found; Thence North 13 degrees, 50 minutes, 03 seconds, East, 103.04 feet to a Y:z inch iron rod found; Thence North 02 degrees, 16 minutes, 59 seconds, East, 77.38 feet to a Y:z inch iron rod found; Thence North 14 degrees, 49 minutes, 32 seconds, West, 83.67 feet to a Y:z inch iron rod found; Thence North 36 degrees, 05 minutes, 17 seconds, West, 157.28 feet to a Y:z inch iron rod found; Thence North 49 degrees, 32 minutes, 07 seconds, West, 83.93 feet to a Y:z inch iron rod found; Thence North 64 degrees, 06 minutes, 23 seconds, West, 53.83 feet to a Y:z inch iron rod found; Thence North 61 degrees, 21 minutes, 47 seconds, East, passing the southwest corner of the above mentioned Block 1, Diamond Loch Apartments at 72.08 feet, continuing now along the common line of said Block 1, Diamond Loch Apartments a total distance of 801.05 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 9.292 acres of land, more or less. 2. THAT, the purpose of this Planned Development District is to provide for a 120 unit independent living facility for elderly persons. The permitted uses and development regulations for this planned development district shall be as follows: 1. Permitted Uses: A 120 unit Independent Living Facility constructed in accordance with the site plan and building elevations attached as Exhibit No. 1. 3. That, the development regulations contained in Ordinance 1874, as amended, and specifically, the R-7-MF Multi-Family Residential Zoning District regulations which are not in conflict with the terms of this Planned Development District shall govern development on said property, except as follows. 1. A six (6) foot wrought iron and masonry column fence shall be constructed along the property line that abuts Glenview Drive. 2. Dwelling unit size shall not be less than 297 square feet per unit and average 504 s.f. 3. Units shall be restricted to elderly persons over 55 years of age Ordinance 2314 Page 2 . e e e I 4. Sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the standards of the City of North Richland Hills along property lines that abut Glenview Drive. 5. Required parking shall be a minimum of one hundred (100) spaces that conform to the standards of the City of North Richland Hills. 6. All and every refuse container on site that is visible from adjacent properties or from a public street shall have a masonry wall that serves to effectively screen it from view. 7. Garages and carports are not required. 8. Landscaping as per city specifications. 9. The recreational space is not required. 1 O.A gated entry is not required. 11.Additional site plan approval is not required. 4. That, all provisions of Ordinance No. 1874, the Zoning Regulations of the City of North Richland Hills, as amended, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Planned Development shall remain applicable on said property, and the provisions of the R-7 -MF District shall apply to this property to guide development, except where amended herein. 5. That, the Zoning Map of the City of North Richland" Hills be amended to reflect this planned development district. 6. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid jUdgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 7. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Rich/and Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. Ordinance 2314 Page 3 - e e e . 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 1998. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 13th DAY OF JULY, 1998. Mayor, City of North Rich/and Hills, Texas A nEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Ordinance 2314 Page 4 - . Planning & Zoning Commissi~n Minutes - June 11, 1998 e 7. PZ 98-15 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF WSI ARCHITECTS FOR A ZONING CHANGE ON TRACT 3R, M. TRIMBLE SURVEY, A-1520 FROM R-7 MULTI-FAMILY TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR AN INDEPENDENT LIVING FACILITY. (LOCATED IN THE 6200 BLOCK OF GLENVIEW DRIVE) APPROVED Vice Chairman Davis opened the public hearing and asked staff to explain this req uest. Mr. LeBaron explained that this 9.3-acre tract of land is on Glenview Drive between the Waterford on the Green and Diamond Loch apartments. It is currently zoned R-7 Multi-family. The applicant is requesting a zoning change to a planned development for a 120 unit independent living facility for senior citizens. Some of the issues involved in this request are dwelling unit size, parking and masonry requirements. e Mr. Don Averitt, Capital Senior Development, presented this request. He explained they have projects going on all over the country. He stated that because they house senior citizens, arrays of room sizes are needed to accommodate financial requirements. The rents range from $1100 - $2400 per month and they do not accept any government assistance. The monthly rent covers 3 meals a day and any transportation that is needed for residents. Mr. Averitt explained that these facilities are built according to the US Senior Citizen Act of 1986, which states the facilities are for people 55 years of age and older. No exceptions are made. .. ." __ . Mr. Averitt stated that they are requesting a waiver of the parking requirements since a lot of the residents won't drive. e Mr. Averitt explained that they are requesting a variance in the minimum dwelling unit size. The smallest unit proposed is 297 square feet. This consists of a bedroom/sitting area with a small closest and bathroom. There is an onsite library, a large dining room, hair salon and craft room. In the 10 years he has worked in Independent Living, he has never seen a facility turn into an apartment complex. They are also requesting a waiver in the required masonry explaining that this is an upscale facility. Page 5 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes - · e e - Responding to a question, Mr. Averitt stated that he currently has this type of facility under construction in Mesquite, San Antonio and Baton Rouge. They have 30 existing facilities in operation across the United States. The unit sizes vary from 297 square feet to 840 square feet, but Mr. Averitt believes that with the common areas, the square footage issue equals out. Seeing no additional proponents or no opponents. The public hearing was closed. Discussion ensued regarding the masonry requirement and their requested waiver. Because there are so many windows and doors on this project, Mr. Cook, the project's engineer, stated it's hard to accommodate the 75% masonry. The first floor will be 100% masonry. The overall structure will be 70.6% masonry. Mr. Davis stated that he doesn't really have a problem with the masonry deviation but he does have a problem with the 297 square foot units. Mr., Wood suggested that filing deed restrictions on the property that place an age restriction on the property would be one way to alleviate the concern of this project turning into apartments down the road. Mr. Averitt stated they would not have a problem with deed restrictions. Mr. Bowen stated that the small unit size bothers him. Mr. Wood agrees with Mr. Bowen and believes that consideration should be placed on the possibility of this project turning into apartments down the road. The market can change drastically. Mr. Miller doesn't like the smallest unit size,· but stated if the market truly exists, . he could live with it. Mr. Ferguson believes the deed restrictions would work well. Mr. Davis believes that the market shows a need for the elderly citizens in our community, however, is concerned about 297 square foot rooms. Mr. Averitt believes this would be a significant addition to the City of NRH and would improve a very bad site. He stated that they have spent a tremendous amount of money trying to make this project something everyone could be proud of. The unit size, while small, fits an economic demand. Mr. Averitt stated additionaUy that he would be the first person to ever build a project like this in a ditch. Page 6 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes - · . Mr. Ferguson, seconded by Mr. Wood, moved to approve PZ 98-15 provided a deed restriction is filed with the County prior to permits being issued stating the 11 conditions outlined in Section 3 of the Ordinance and adding that no one under 55 years of age may be a lessee. The motion carried with a vote of 4 _ 1. Messrs. Ferguson, Wood, Miller & Davis were in favor of this request. Mr. Bowen was opposed. e e Page 7 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes - · WSI 'Architects e ARCHITECTURE 0 PLANNING 0 INTERIORS ........-.-.. "'-c"" .1l to·.··,"1 ,.. ~~-,.... .' . .... tÑ~ .' ",. y" ~~"C ~~.:~~.~ (..1'" ) ~ .~I. .~ . ," .-:¥ ~ WSI Project Number: 9 7 3 4 ,·c:. . ~ , Capital Senior Development, Inc. Project Number: 754. .{?/ , ~::. .. ..~ . .' 'j . ~,:) , .... :\; ~~~,\ The Waterford North Richland Hills, Texas 26 May 1998 EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL AREAS - Based on area from foundation to roof soffit line, less window and door openings. Elevation View Brick Area Siding Area Total Area % Brick Front Elevation 1 , 192 sf 216 sf 1 ,408 sf 84.7% Rear Elevation 1 ,273 sf 660 sf 1,933 sf 65.9% End Elevation 2-story East 747 sf 203 sf 950 sf 78.6% End Elevation 3-story East 975 sf 434 sf 1,409 sf 69.2% End Elevation 2-story West 747 sf 203 sf 950 sf 78,6% End Elevation 3-story West 975 sf 434 sf 1,409 sf 69.2% e Right Wing - North 3,531 sf 2,758 sf 6,289 sf 56.1% Right Wing - South 2,676 sf 2,382 sf 5,058 sf 52.9% Left Wing - North 1,443 sf 806 sf 2,249 sf 64.2% Left Wing - South 1,704 sf 552 sf 2,256 sf 75.7% TOTALS 15,263 sf 8,648 sf 23,911 sf 63.8% ELEVATIONS FACING GLENVIEW DRIVE Elevation View Brick Area Siding Area Total Area % Brick Front Elevation End Elevation 2-story East End Elevation 3-story East 1 , 192 sf 747 sf 975 sf 216 sf 203 sf 434 sf 1,408 sf 950 sf 1 ,409 sf 84.7% 78.6% 69.2% TOTALS 2,914 sf 853 sf 3,767~!__ 77.4% 6 3 2 0 L B J F r f! f! W ~ Y D SUI T E 2 2 8 D D ^ L L ^ S, T X 7 5 2 .. 0 . 6 .. 2 3 D (9 7 2) .. 5 8 _ 9 9 9 9 D F ^ X (9 7 21 .. 5 8 _ 1 5 6 6 \(, .\J~.'......... . D~ . ~/t BECF. \\.'C~.'" '-~'{> >- . ,p I- u'\J L ,~ ' o I"P-\ 0 § 1 ---0"- 1tvNING &. ~ e - e WSI Arch itects = ARCHITECTURE 0 PLANNING 0 INTERIORS July 7, 1998 Christopher Baker City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Re: Waterford North Rich/and Hills WSIPr~ectNo. 9734 Dear Mr. Baker: In submitting our site plan for the above referenced project, please note the revision to the 6'-0" high masonry screen wall along Glenview Drive. A portion of the wall was deleted to e accommodate the construction of the drainage head wall and the grade fall at this location. The staggered wall design was also modified to accommodate the site grading along the front of the property. Respectfully, WSI Architects Edward T. Stefoniak, Vice President h ~.! ETS/es ,. ~.- ~ --.. . "(L:I .,,,.',,, ....\ í;~'iJ',,,\~" ~ "ov· ,- /:;f' X"\~... \ IG- ~,. V". t~·.x" \/''. ... (,' ~~ ~. !.. <-( ,~.. \..~ ,; õ '? (', ~ ~ \ \ \ ( '\'~r . \~ ~ " .'-r:: J : \~ .' "kJI.Z .... ~.?' .. ,..;" ,~ .. ~.-'1 e 6320 LBI FREEWAY - SUITE 228 .) DALLAS. TE\.-\S 752.Q.6423 972,458·9999 . FAX 972.458.1566 - CITY OF N$RTH RICHLANDHILLS .ay 11.1998 Planning & Inspection Services Mr. Edward Stefoniak WSI Architects' 6320 LBJ Freeway Suite 228 Dallas, Texas 75240 RE: Waterford Site Plan Mr. Stefoniak: I have reviewed the site plan submitted to the Planning and Zoning Office on May 4, 1998 regarding the above referenced property. It appears as if all of the comments this office made in the previous site plan comment letter dated March 20, 1998 have been adequately addressed. However, in reviewing the submitted elevations it appears as if not all elevations are shown. .ditionally, it also appears that the building, as proposed, does not currently meet the 65% masonry building requirements as established for the R7-MF, Multi-Family zoning district. It is important to point out that this development is not a Multi-Family project. The City of North Richland Hills is merely using the R7-MF development regulations as a guideline for the Planned Development proposed. .. . Please indicate in a graphical manner, i.e. new elevations, a table, or a graph, the masonry -", .. calculations for the proposed building. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, a:: -7 ~ -;::>, ~ ,(c Æ"lristopher D. Baker ~anner P.O. Box 820609 . North Rich/and Hills, Texas. 76182.0609 USA 7301 Northeast Loop 820 . 817-581-5514. FAX 817'656-7503 - . CITY OF N*RTH RICHLANDHILLS e March 20, 1998 Planning & Inspection Services Mr. Edward Stefoniak WSI Architects 6320 LBJ Freeway Suite 228 Dallas, Texas 75240 RE: Waterford Addition Site Plan Mr. Stefoniak: I have reviewed the site plan submitted to the Planning and Zoning office on March 13, 1998. The following comments are based on and numerically follow the conditions related to approval of a Planned Development as outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. Please find attached a copy of this section, 1. Setbacks for buildings or structures: Building setbacks for the north property line and the front of the building facing Glenview are provided. Setbacks for the west and the southern elevations of the proposed building shall be provided with the next submittal. e 2. Public street access: This item is addressed on the site plan. 3. Drainage: As discussed during the preliminary platting of this property there may be significant drainage improvements required. No drainage information is provided on the site plan. Consequently, site design and layout may change as a result of engineering. Approval of the site plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council in no manner reflects approval of engineering plans. 4. Vehicular traffic, circulation, parking spaces: Adequate circulation is provided. The width of drive fanes should be indicated on the next submittal. The site plan indicates 100 parking spaces. 5. Screening or buffer zones: The site plan indicates a 6-foot wooden fence along the northern and the southern property lines. It is unclear if this fence continues along the western boundary of the property. A more clear depiction of where fencing will be constructed shall be required in the next submittal. It appears as if the western open space portion of the property may be used as a buffer zone. Indication of the setback of the building from the western property line on the next submittal is required. 6. Hours of Operation: It is presumed that since this is facility is proposed to be an independent living facility there will be limited work hours. Indication of hours of operation should be submitted with the next submittal. 7. Activities and Uses permitted on the property: The proposed facility will be utilized as an independent living center for retired persons. This will be the only permitted use. This permitted use does not allow for multi-family utilization as a normal apartment facility would. . 8. Building or structure heights: The submitted elevations provide the necessary information. P.O. Box 820609 . North Rich/and Hills, Texas. 76182-0609 USA 7301 Northeast Loop 820 . 817 -581-5514 . FAX 817-656-7503 - · g. Landscaping: Review of the site indicates compliance with the iandscape reguiations of the City of North Rich/and Hills. 10. Maximum aliowable lot coverage: Calculations showing Ihe impervious and pervious areas of the lot shall be provided with the next submittal. 11. Pedestrian Circulation: It appears from the sile plan that there is adequate pedestrian circulation on site and that it adjoins the sidewalk adjacent to Glenview Drive. 12. Signs: The proposed monument sign does not meet the sign regulations of the City of North Richland Hills. A copy of the monument sign regulations is attached for your review. 13. Mitigation of noise, fumes, odors, vibration, or airborne particles: None associated with the proposed development. 14. Exterior Lighling: No exterior lighting is proposed on the submitted site plan. If exterior iighting is to be utilized it shall be shown on the next submittal. 15. Exterior construction materials: This information is provided. 16. Special fire protection measures: Additional fire protection may be required by the building official during the review of building plans. However, none are required to be shown on the site plan. e 17. Outside storage and display of merchandise: None associated with the proposed use. 18. Refuse and waste storage: A dumpster at the rear of the building. Screening of the dumpster and construction materials shall be indicated on the next submittal. 19. lot sizes and dimensions: Please provide this information with the next submittal. 20. Accessory building: None indicated with the proposed development. It is my understanding that an application for a Planned Development will be filed with the Planning and Zoning Office. ' To date, this has not occurred. This site plan will be reviewed in conjunction with the zoning change request at both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. Specific dates of the meetings are contingent on receipt of the application. As indicated above, there does need to be some revision of the submitted site plan. We will require 15 copies of the revised site plan only. We do not need 15 new copies of the elevations. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, CLsLL, D ~L- Christo~~ ~ker Planner e - 'Ni~H (PI-!as-a ~r:nt :r t'/Ø~ all r..spor.s~s) APPLICATION FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Ciiy of North Richland Hills 7301 NE loo;¡ 820 NOr!h Richland Hills, T~X3S 817 -581-5500 PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION ame ol applicant / ag~nt: W01 Street address of applicant / agent: 6~o /..8r.J City / State / Zip Code of applicant / açenr: ~LL..d 5/ 'l}( X-.t?CIl17~C7.5 ~p"¡~.L DPW IIcJGD/¡(JG FRJ!;.€';WA1 J ~.. Z28 75240 /Æ/c. Name of property owner. PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Telephone number of applicant / agenr: 9701-458 - r¡~ 7/ OFW flOLD/ A.Jéo /NC ?~,<:1cr 7~~¿j-o Telephone number of property Owner. 772-...770- ~ct:J Street address of property owner. ILl-I ~o p~L¿A.5 City / State / Zip Code of property owner. D¡:JLLAS 7x NOle: Attach lerrer or affidavit from propefi'/ owner If differenl from applicant / agent; PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Current zoning classification: R-7-MF- Legal Descriplion or Arrach Meles & Bounds: ATTACHED De scnbe Ihe nature of the proposed act/vIr/ and any particular characteristics related 10 Ihe use of the property: ~¡UIO¿ ~ SIte plan allacf1ed which conform:; wrth the requirements included in this packet; :~Ye:; ! 1 No Affidavit arrached from property Owner if applicant is not Owner. l ì Yes L-.J No Dale: I hereby certlf,/that I am. or represent. the legal owner of the property descnbed above and do hereby Subm/tthis request for approval of a Planned Development Distn'ct to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration, Date of City Counctl Public Hearing: Taxes PaId' i ' Yes ! No Print Name' Signature: Dale of Plannmg G Zoning Commlss/on p~,o/¡c Heanng: PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONL Y Planned Development Approved: ,---; Yes 11 No ---.. - Liens ~ : : Yes l j No Fee: ')[!,'15 Condllions of Approval: ASSessmenlS Paid? l : Yes I 1 $300.00 No . This application will not be scheduled for public hearing until the application fee is received. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CD -415 (5/97) - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department Planning & Inspections Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 SubjectPublic Hearing to Consider the Request of .Jim M::Jkens Agenda Number: P7 qR-1R For a Zoning Change from AG-Agricultural to C1-Commercial On a Portion of Tract 11B, T. Peck Survey, A-1210. (Located in the 8700 Block of Davis Blvd.) Ordinance No. 2306 Postponed 6/8/98 This item was postponed at the June 8, 1998 meeting after the public hearing was opened because the applicant was not represented. Staff has re-advertised this public hearing in the official newspaper of the city. Mr. Makens is the agent representing Orval Hall Excavating Company, the owner of the property, and is requesting the property be rezoned from AG-Agricultural to C1-Commercial. This property is located on the north side of the new intersection of Precinct Line Road and Davis Boulevard and is directly adjacent to the city limit lines with Colleyville and Keller, located east and north respectfully. The property contains approximately 3.74 acres of land. The applicant originally requested C2-Commercial zoning, but at the May 14, 1998 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting Mr. Makens submitted a letter changing his request to C 1-Commercial zoning. The applicant has indicated that the property will be developed as a convenience store with gasoline sales. At this location, C-1 Commercial zoning would allow a convenience store with gasoline sales without a Special Use Permit because the property is more than 200' away from residential property. All property owners within 200' of this request have been notified. At the June 8, 1998 public hearing before the City Council, Mr. Robert O'Riley, 9001 Trails Edge Drive, stated that without a site plan there is no particular need at this time for a zoning change. He stated that the City was reconsidering zoning regulations all over the City and by the time a site plan comes forward, the types of businesses in C 1-Commercial may change. This rezoning request is in accordance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the City of NRH. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at its May 14, 1998 meeting and recommended approval of the request for rezoning to C 1-Commercial. RECOMMENDA TION: To hold the required public hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ er Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION Finance" Directo~ Page 1 of U t 4( c Agenda # ... . " r UJ c UJ C IL. UJ C ... ... ... ... a: a: c a: l- I- l- I- ¡ l;;;; A íE ,r\~ '. '" \ \\ y \i LL£ ~ '~ R!VEFl ~ e i! TR 1 C2 4.84 AC _4.._... "" 3 ! TR 1 C3 3.14 AC , . u - - A1 1.612 0 PZ 98-16 cØJ ... OJ ..,. - ) I- )O 120 241 2ZI TR 1C ! .33 @ TR 1C7 .788 AC TR 1 C6 ! .5 AC 2: .'______ II co .,~ "".' TR 11C e 4.0 C o ð1 '0.:10 ,04 ,0-. ^ ~Q . . ,. .., <=',)( ~ TR 11 A 5.272 0 <. ~ ., ~ rArE - ~ 18 - JOG - TR 10H1 .976 AC ! TR 10H 3.539 C rl? 10 II U"3'1€3 . - u 4( 10 o J ; W -·NE:S HAY ~..~ ~ ! TR 1FF. 2.13 A 18 2. 132 0 . ... aJ .-t a: 17' . 1 § e e - - ORDINANCE NO. 2306 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2,·SECTION 200, OF ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 22,1993; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a change in zoning district boundaries; and· WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THA T, in Case Number PZ 98-16, the following described property shall be rezoned from AG Agricultural to C 1 Commercial. BEING a 3.74-acre tract of land out of the Thomas Peck Survey, A-1210, Tarrant County Texas, and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a one-half inch iron pipe found at the northeast corner of said Peck Survey, THENCE south 01 00 37 west a distance of 41 0.21 feet to a fence post for corner, THENCE south 89 59 37 west a distance of 328.20 feet to a brass State Highway monument in the north right-of-way of Farm to Market Road No. 3029 (Precinct Line Road), THENCE north 55 51 31 west a distance of 119.72 feet along said right-of-way to an iron rod for corner, THENCE north 20 09 00 west a distance of 67.96 feet to an iron pin at the intersection of the north right-of-way of Farm to Market Road 3029 and the east right-of-way of Farm to Market Road 1938, also being in a curve to the left whose center bears north 63 40 26 west a distance of 2924.8 feet, THENCE north easterly with said easterly right-of-way line of Farm to Market Road 1938, with a curve to the left, radius of 2924.8 feet, a distance of 304.3 feet to an iron rod for corner said point being in the north line of said Peck Survey, THENCE south 89 59 19 east along north line of said Peck Survey, a distance of 337.4 feet to the point of beginning and containing 163,084.43 square feet or 3.74 acres of land, more or less. Ord.2306 Page 1 e e e '2. THAT, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein. 3. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14th DAY OF MAY 1998. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission Ord. 2306 Page 2 e e e - PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 13th DAY OF JULY 1998. Mayor City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Rich/and Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Ord. 2306 Page 3 e e e I Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes _ June 11, 1998 ,7. PZ 98-16 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF JIM MAKENS FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM AG AGRICULTURAL TO C2 COMMERCIAL ON A PORTION OF TRACT 11B, T. PECK SURVEY, A-1210. (LOCATED IN THE 8700 BLOCK OF DA VIS BOULEVARD) TABLED 4/23/98 APPROVED Chairman Barfield informed the audience that the applicant had submitted a letter requesting the zoning request be down graded to a C-1 Commercial classification and opened the pUblic hearing. Mr. Jim Makens, applicant presented his requesting stating that he is in favor of the proposed change. Chairman Barfield called for additional proponents. Mr. James Lawbacher, 8805 Hedge Row Court, stated that the Steeple Ridge residents prefer the C-1 classification, they will be making a presentation in the near future regarding a North Davis Boulevard Overlay Zone, and the majority of that proposal shows C-1 zoning along this corridor. Mr. James McCan, 8508 Steeple Ridge Drive, was also in favor of this request. Seeing no additional proponents or opponents, Chairman Barfield closed the public hearing. Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mr. Ferguson moved to approve PZ 98-16 as a C-1 zoning classification. The motion carried with a vote of 7 - O. Messrs. Miller, Wood, Bowen, Barfield, Ferguson, Nehring & Davis were in favor of this request. Page 5 - 5/14/98 P & Z Minutes Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April 23, 1998 e REQUEST OF LANDES & ASSOCIATES FOR A FINAL PLAT T NOWN AS LOTS 6 & 7, BLOCK 4, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITI OCA TED IN THE 5600 BLOCK OF RUFE SNOW APPROVED 7. ML LeBaron explained that this 1. re tract of land is on the west side of Rufe Snow Drive, just south of Ea rest Drive. It is being platted as two lots and one of the issues associa with this plat is that there was a preliminary plat done on this property· 993 and the three-year time limit has already expired. A waiver of the tim mit should be considered or the applicant will need to resubmit anoth reliminary plat. Staff doesn't believe this would be necessary since no ch ges in development have Occurred. Additionally, two easements should ncluded on the plat, a five-foot utility easement on the south and a 7- ~ fo tility easement on th.e west. . .. L Coy Landes, Landes & Associates presented this request and stated that they have n.o problem granting the easements Mr. LeBaron discussed. Additionally, he Would like to change the lot number to run consistent with the existing addition. It should be changed to 5 & 6, since Man's Best Friend is Lot 4. Mr. Davis moved, seconded by Mr. Nehring to approve PS 98-23 with the ch.anges in the lot numbers and adding the requested easements. The motion carried 5 O. Messrs. Davis, Nehrin en were in favor o 8. PZ 98-16 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF JIM MAKENS FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM AG AGRICULTURAL TO C2 COMMERCIAL ON A PORTION OF TRACT 11 B, T. PECK SURVEY, A-121 O. (LOCATED IN THE 8700 BLOCK OF DAVIS BLVD.) TABLED Mr. LeBaron explained that this is a 3 % acre tract of land located at the north end of the city, just where Precinct Line Road intersects Davis Boulevard and is currently zoned AG Agr~cultural. One letter of opposition has been received regarding this request,' which states a C-1 zoning classification would be preférred. ' . - Page 4 - 4/23/98 e e e - Chairman Barfield opened the public hearing and asked for any proponents. Seeing none, he called for any Opponents. Mr. Peter Churchill, 8617 Ashley Court, stated he was speaKing on behalf of the committee that has been established on the North Davis Boulevard Corridor Study. He stated he had hoped to see plans for the proposed and believes a C- 1 district would better fit into the "plan" for the area. . . '. Mr. Jim McCain, 8508 Steeple Ridge, also stated he is opposed to a C-2 cla~sification'and would prefer C-1 along the North Davis corridor. Seeing no additional opponents, Chairman Barfield closed the public hearing. Responding to a question, Mr. LeBaron stated that the proposed use would fit into the C-1 zoning district by right, but stated the Commission should be cautious down grading the zoning without the applicant being present. Mr. Ferguson made the motion to table PZ 98-16 until the applicant can be present. Mr. Davis seconded the motion and it carried 5 - O. Messrs. Ferguson, Davis, Nehring, Barfield & Bowen were in favor of this request. 9. PZ 98-19 PUBLIC HEARING THE REQUEST OF GREG CLIFTON FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM AG AGRI TIAL ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CLIFTON ADDITION. (LOCATED AT 8912 DSON ROAD) APPROVED Chairman Barfield opened the public hear" and called for any proponents. Seeing none, hè. cälled for any oppo s. Seeing none, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Bowen moved, £ec ed by Mr. Ferguson, to approve PZ 98-19. The motion carried wit . ote of 5 - O. Messrs. Bowen, Ferguson, Davis, Nehring & vor of this request. 10. STAFF COMMENTS Mr. LeBaron reminded the Commissioners th ments Advisory Commi e conducted as Soon as this meeting Page 5 - 4/23/98 e e e The MAKENS COMPANY May 5, 1998 Mr. Christopher Baker City Planner, City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Re: Proposed Pleasant Hill Addition 3.74 acres - Precinct Line and Davis Blvd. Dear Mr. Baker: Please accept this letter as formal request to revise the zoning application dated April 3, 1998 submitted on my behalf. I request that the proposed zoning classification be modified ITom C-2 and replaced with a request of C-l. Should you have any additional questions or comments related to my application, please feel1Tee to give me a call at your convenience. Respectfully, ~ Jim Makens JM:pkg dim-Bakor SOS m C~OWŒfñ) WaY 7 1998 æJ V; PlANNING & INSPECTIONS 2300 Airport Frwy., Suite 230, Bedford, Texas 76022 Metro (817) 540-3229 (817) 571-4114 Fax (817) 540-1583 e e e 04/06/98 MON 11:58 FAX 817 FILE No. 923 04/06 '98 08~ ; 2941 ORVAL HALL ¡ D : THE ",q(ENS CO 8175. 583 ~002 PAGE 2 OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT State of Texas County of Tarrant BEFORE ME) the undeniped authority, on thi5 day pM'5oœ11y appeared Mike Hall, President of Orval Ran Excavating Company, 'known to me 10 be the person and/or officer whose name is subscribed hereto aDd upon oath deposes end 58YS; THAT, James MakcD! of Makens Investments, Inc, is hereby authorized to fonnally represent (he I1ndersigned owner in the rezoning and platting of propeny described as approximately 3.74 acres o{ land known AS a Tract out of the Thomas Peck Survcy, Abstract 1210, City of North Richland Hills, T8mlnt COWlty, Texas. OWN£"R: ~I Aally8 Company By, ~ Mike II. President SWORN TO AND SUBSCRlBED b~forc me on this lp day of April, 1998. [~~~ NamePrintecf f J'"2.AlD~ ~~ Commission Expires 4 - a. s- - l-o 0 ( 04/06 '98 11: 55 Ni~H City of North Richland Hills APPLlCA TION FOR A 7301 NE loop 820 ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE North Rich/and Hills, Texas (Please print or type all responses) 817-581-5500 ART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant / agent: James Makens Street address of applicant / agent: 2300 Airport Freeway, Suite 230 City / State I Zip Code of applicant I agent: Telephone number of applicant I agent: Bedford, Texas 76022 ( 817) 571-4114 PART 2. PROPERTY INFORMATION Street address at location where zoning district change is being requested: 8700 Block of Davis Boulevard Legal Description of Property where zoning district change is being requested: Being described as a 3.74 acre tract out of the Thomas Peck survey, Abstræt 1210, 'Iarrant Canty, . ~ Current zoning classification: Proposed zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: AG C2 Retail, Convenience Store with gas sales Reason for zoning district change: To facilitate commercial service uses which will be in demand upon the completion of Precinct Line Road. Surveyor map attached as required by application: Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner: X'" Yes ¡No '¡Yes r-X' No Will provide - - - - RT 3. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION e of property owner: Orvall Hall Excavating Company Street address of property owner: 201 N.E. 29th STreet City I State I Zip Code of property owner: Telephone number of property owner: Fort Worth..!. Texas 76106 (817) 624-7207 Note: Attach letter or affidavit from property owner if different from applicant / agent: I hereby certify that I am. or represent. the legal owner of the property described above and do hereby submit this request for approval of a Date: ~ril 3 , 1998 zoning district change to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration. ~ ./ ~ Print Name: James Makens )< Signature: ~ ~ -----7 .......----- .--- ---==.------_..._ PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Planning & Zoning Commission Public Heanng: Taxes Paid? Case Number: ÅP fZ..\ L- ---- Z'3, I'~ B Yes No ?i "'~.J" -.. Date of City Council Public Hearing: Fee: _.-. - ~ ----. ~AV JIJ l'jOj ß Yes No --- ~-~ ~ Zoning District Change Approved: $300.00 _u,__. I--t . Yes . No Yes No ~.ons~f~PProval: -, ._, :- -.' This application will not be scheduled for public hearing until application fee is received. Zoning District Change CD - 407 (2/97) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~ Department: Planning & Inspections Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Subject: Request of Brad Young of MDK Development r.orpor~tion Agenda Number: P7 qR-?R for Site Plan Approval to Reduce the Masonry Requirement at 5411 Hilltop Drive Mr. Brad Young is the agent representing Cary Vollintine in this site plan approval case. Mr. Vollintine is the owner of the existing Southwest Storage facility located across the street from the location of his proposed expansion. Mr. Vollintine would like to expand his business by constructing a new facility across the street to the west of the existing warehouse facility. The exterior of the proposed new building does not meet the masonry building requirement of 75%. The proposed structure utilizes inoperable metal doors. These "false" metal doors serve no other purpose than to identify the property as a self-storage facility and to reduce the construction costs for the owner. These doors do not open or access any storage unit. As a result, they cannot be excluded from calculating the masonry percentage of each elevation. The new regulations, approved on April 13, 1998, requires site plan approval by the City Council to reduce the percent of masonry below the required 75% threshold of each elevation. Mr. Young is requesting approval of this site plan so the owner may use false metal doors on the exterior instead of masonry as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Staff calculated the percentage of masonry as follows: 21.53% on the north and south elevations and 14.37% on the east and west elevations. If the false doors were operable, they would not be included in the percentage calculation. In a related issue, the developer is also required to construct a six-foot masonry screening wall for a distance of approximately 610 feet, along the southern property line where it abuts an existing multi- family development. However, the owner is only developing the front half of the property. The developer applied to the Zoning Board of Adjustment asking for a variance to only build approximately 300 feet of masonry screening wall. The ZBA denied this request. The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this request at it's June 11, 1998 meeting and recommended denial. Mr. Young submitted the attached letter requesting consideration by the Council. / RECOMMENDA TION: To deny the site plan as recommended by the Planning & Zoning Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Othe Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finan..' Direct"; c:; rtme t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of ~'¡¿" ;Jo.O'f9j.L. KING M(O RV(Y 50 892 A- TA 183 10.7/'J...AC 1A .5 I ;./S?<f)<,- ,. ) I,.I.ø ~I .- c"., BROWNING DR .,. (g4~ Cø"\b t. N 1A 1A1A1 ã II e u. ~ 2 .. 3.06 AC (,<..\51 l 1 ..0. 0' 1 /"). /7 TA 1A 4.82 AC J tv' VA~Vt:Y 5lJ 1588 TA 18 A- 4.50 AC e e - Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - June 11, 1998 10. PZ 98-26 REQUEST OF BRAD YOUNG OF MDK DEVELOPMENT CORP. FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO REDUCE THE MASONRY REQUIREMENT ON LOT 3, BLOCK 3, T APP ADDITION. (LOCATED IN THE 5400 BLOCK OF HILLTOP DRIVE) DENIED Mr. Brad Young presented his request. He stated that his client would like to expand the existing mini-warehouses on Hilltop Drive. They would like to keep the same appearance as the existing warehouses, but this facility will be climate controlled. They propose to attach non-operable doors on the outside of this new climate controlled facility that would match the orange doors on the existing facility. If the doors were operable, they would not need to apply for a reduction in masonry. Responding to a question, Mr. Young stated that it would be possible to paint fake doors on a tilt wall and that the proposed facility would look identical to the existing facility, but the doors will be inoperable. Mr. LeBaron stated that this case seems somewhat bureaucratic because if the doors functioned as doors, this wouldn't be an issue. But since inoperable doors are proposed in this internally accessed facility, the masonry requirement becomes an issue. Responding to a question, Mr. Young stated that the building would be of pre- cast concrete columns at 10' centers, with "dummy doors" that are identical to the operable doors on the existing facility. They would be mounted exactly as the operable doors. Metal liner panels with insulation would be directly behind the fake doors. Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mr. Davis, moved to deny PZ 98-26. The motion carried with a vote of 5 - O. Messrs. Bowen, Davis, Wood, Miller & Ferguson were in favor of this motion. Page 11 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes e MDK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. SELF STORAGE [;f:VtLOF'MEt~T SPE(;fAUSTS GEj..¡ERJ~L CO~JTR,:\'CTOR P.O. BOX 941 MIOlOTHIAN, TEXAS 76065 19721723-3322 June 18, 1998 City of North Richland Hills Mr. Christopher Baker Planning and Inspections Department 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Rich/and Hills, TX 76180 Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Decision on Masonry Requirement Please be advised that Mr. Cary Vollintine, the owner of the land located on Hilltop Drive in North Richland Hills, described as Lot 3, Block 3, Tapp Addition, zoned 1-2, wishes to continue to seek to obtain a variance allowing non-operable doors to be used as a primary element of the exterior walls of the proposed expansion of his self storage facility on Lot 2, Block 3, Tapp Addition, which is across the street. You have informed us that we must seek a reversal of the planning commission decision which denied him this option by appealing to the City Council. The wall components between doors will still be masonry. The proposed non-operable doors will exactly resemble the operable roll up doors e of the existing facility in look. We hereby make formal petition to be heard by said City Council in its regular session to present our case first hand to these citizens of the Council, trusting that they will recognize the validity of our case. cc: Cary Vollintine e site plan approval appeal. wpd e e e '"""" OJ' "'u,, UCIIC",-UP"ltHII. \"UrnfJdflY, lnC.j 'dl¿ I¿;j bU;j:>j Jun·19·9B 12:32AMj Page 2/2 MDK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. .~n¡:, $T(1F1....úf~jfV~~.Off't'ë:'llT ~;·~~C-I.\ 10. ~:)T $. (j~..fR...L CO~:TR~CTOR ~.I'). lOX ,.., Mir.>i..òn·U.A.N. T!XA5 7'()iI'5~ 19777':J.:r:n, June 18, 1998 City of North Richland Hills Mr. Christopher Baker Planning and Inspections Department 7301 N. E. loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Decision on Masonry Requirement Please be advised that Mr. Cary Vollintine. the owner of the land located On Hilltop Drive in North Richland Hills, described as Lot 3, Block 3, Tapp Addition. zoned 1-2, wishes to continue to seek to obtain a veriance ellowing non-operable doors to be usod as a primary element or lhe exterior wells Of the proposed expansion of his self storage facility on lot 2, Block 3, Tapp Addition, which is across the street. You heve informed us that we must seek a reversal of the planning commission decision which denied him this oPtion by appealing to the City Council. The wall components between doors will still be masonry. The proposed non-operable doors will exactly resemble the operable roll up doors of the existing facility in look. We hereby make formal petition to be heard by said City Council in its regular session to present our case first hand to these citizens of the Council, trusting that they will recognize the validity of our case. cc: Cary Vollintine .;t8 plan apD<Ov" appeaL...XI e e . e '. -JO "'-'~ ....-.............,................ "'"'W"",.,Q.IIJJ .'1\,,00_, :;,c. ,e..;) UV..J~J ,",UII-'~-~O 1¿;.j¿AMj "'age 1 ¡;¿ facsimile TRANSMITTAL To; Christopher Baker Of: NRH Planning Department Fax: 817-656-7538 Phone: 817-581-5515 Pages: 2, including this cover sheet. Date: June 19, 1998 Here is the appeal Jener for Our case with the City Council. Would you please send me a copy of your staff recommendations &om the previous meetings. Also, I would like a copy of the relevant ordinance controlling this issuc. Thanks for your help. The original letter is in the mail, as per Val's instructions. My civil engineer wiIl be by today to pick up the plans and comments. From the desk of... Bnldtey YQU~ President MOK Development Company. Inc. P.O. 801( 941 MidIQlhian. TX 7G065 972-723-3322 I" aJC: 972-723-6035 :. i e -- 214-880-96e~ PGAL 438 P05 MAY 15 '98 09:27 City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E, Loop 620 NOM Aichland HUls. TX 76180 817· 581 - 5515 Property Location: Street Address of Property: Legal Description of Property: Application fQr Site Plan Review Ni~H {Pleat. pmc all 1I!00ll$ul . -- .- -llJ u.:rt> e~j~--f-- ,tiJ?·~1f1'- _Tx .__ _..__ ,,__ .../&2"[_2 _T2~...3 _TA.ef? -~TLQ~-+-.Ng.tf¡Tic Property Owner Information: Name of Property Owner: ..CAg'1. ..VOL4.l.I\rrJN~_. PhonaNo. (lC?):?¡?J:,_f.2~ J~ .1<~'''~M-i'' ._,___5~_17 ~__~~......._. ,....... 71 . _ Zip: :¡,1. O.~ Address of Property Owner: City: lk~º,J _.___ ___ State: Applicant / Authorized Agent Information: UNote: An affidavit signed by the property owner is required when the agent is not the property owner. Name of Applicant! Authorized Agent: MDK ,~R11~,¡ ft.!? , Phone No. .£ Q=--__16o;< _:1 fL.. . M I t:>.J,.,crfJf.1.~___. . . __. . , 1.]2 -7.z.?~ },?'Z"Z Address: .. --..... ......--... - --_. .. -....... -.- .. ...... City: Type of Site Plan Review: , ,; Planned Development .,R-6-T Townhomes IX Stale: Zip: L._..;Specific Use Permit Required Documents: The following table contains a checklist of the minimum items required for Site Plan Review. .. _.. - . .. .. ... ..-... SpeCIal ; Planned Use Townhomes MUIÞ'/amilv Oeve~pme_~! Permit !. .. -. ... .. .. R R R R .- R R ... .. . .. .. ... R R R R ..-.. , .. -, . .. R R R i A . .... ....... ...... . . R A R I R I .- '" ...-! .., R R ! : .L. .. .. -. - .. . R R : R I R .. --. -.. .. .-- -. R R .. R R , .. .-.. . ... .. , R R i R - - . A R R R (Can b! .3U~,!,.!..~ at_~~!.o! P~~~~~) R R R .j R .. -... .. .. R R R R .....- .--.... ...-.-- .-..--- : ." ~ P~t Pla~ ~owin~ e~~I~~.~ pl~~~ 3~~res. b~d~. line,. b~~~~~. incl_ :~seme~~. ._ : 2. ~~~ogr~~ic ~1~~~!~ !'~_~~f?.U!~ draw~.at ~? '~t ir1le.~~s. .. 00_ : 3:.i~re~~tion d~~ng$ of ~~ bua~i~~ ind~~,~e pr?~~sed exte~.~!st1 ~~I,e~.~s. ~ 4. ;~~~s..c:aPio9.lighting,. ~c~~~~elni~.. ~ waD, indica~~.~~1 ~eigh~., . ¡ _5..:.,;~0.ca~n of e~e$$ iln~ ingre.:!: __. ._._. . _' .. i 6. ;Qt1-$!reet parking and loading facilitie,. ¡--+ .. .-.--- . --- - ...... . . ...-- . , 7. :AII pedestrian walk$, malls. and open areas. 1.- . .-.---___u.__.. , ~. : ~:oP~!~ !and us.a~ ~~~~g areas.~ squar~ ~~.. . . : ? iLoca~~ & Iy¡¡es~! ~i~:..~~dini Ugh ring ~d h~igh~.wirh e_~~rion ~~~gs. ! O. ; Slteet names on proposed streets. . .....-----.-. --. ---- ..--- .. ...... ! .11. ~exis!!!,y ~prop~~~_~~.t~.r~~: ~.~~ø~~!:.~~: gracl~ p~n. , ; t ,. 'Engineering drawings of all public improvements to be dedicated to !he Ciry. I ··1-·--_..__._ .---. ___".__.. __... .._00' n.n : .'.3. ~~~'-.: ~nd_dram.~ge ~~m~~t~! I~.!'~ Ol.~~ ~~~.di~£o_sall~ci/li~e'. : 14. iAddilionar items as required by rite City Council. I ..~...__ _ .__..... ..._......__ ..... Note: -R" :I Required . .... .. .-.. . I C4f1ify thaI I am, or repressnt 1 own" of thll properry de3CfIÒlld above and hereby suomi! this Sire Plan 10 /he City 01 No Date: .~-I J... . !it.? YOl/rn/lmø(PfinlsdNamB): _.~._~N(P .__._.. Signature: d HiU, for review and approval. ~~. --.. -I--IfÞ~_____ '_. Site Plan Review Application "1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning & Inspections Department: Subject: Request of Jim Walker for a Replat of Lot 1 R, Block 2, Thompson Park Estates AdditIon. (Located in the 6300 Block of Precinct Line Road) Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Agenda Number: PS 97-60 Mr. Walker is representing Conoco in this case who wishes to develop this 1.2-acre tract of land into a convenience store with gasoline sales. The property is located on the west side of Precinct Line Road, just south of its intersection with Mid-Cities Boulevard. The property is currently zoned C-1 with a Special Use Permit for a convenience store. This Special Use Permit was approved by the City Council in December 1997. The Planning & Zoning Commission held the required public hearing on this replat at their June 11, 1998 meeting. A public hearing was held because the Texas Local Government Code requires public notice and hearing on replatting cases when the property has been zoned for residential land uses within the last five years. The issues associated with this replat are as follows: 1. Sewer: Conoco is proposing to tie into a newly constructed sewer main on the BISD property to the west. At this time the main has not been accepted by the City and is not in service. Before sewer service is available to this site the appropriate approvals will be required of the BISD sewer line. 2. Driveway Spacing: The plat submitted is in conformance with the driveway spacing approved by the City Council in conjunction with the SUP request. This plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the City of NRH. The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this request at it's June 11, 1998 meeting and recommend approval provided no Certificate of Occupancy is issued until the sewer service at the high school is available. RECOMMENDA TION: To approve the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission for this replat provided no Certificate of Occupancy is issued until the sewer service at the high school is available. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Avaifable l =J3B:get =~ ~CJ_"-- ~ D~ Signature ' - CITY COUNCIL ACTION IT Finance Director Page 1 of e TJI:. "AJ. / S, ,Sì¡' 9 @ :.t / ~ 1SA ~ '-\:) , i À.. i ~ 16A ~ 'e ~ I" WAYNE LN 9200 . ;? ~ 7A ~ ~ ! - T"'O , 1 Tri 20 ,811 AC "'" = 4A2 ·9 C TR 2 Lf. ~ ').O.J.c,. 1>0 :. g'1 ~ G2 /Y}ID-CïrIE5 BLVD ; iI.1 "- .., ...., TI? J./AJ.8 1I,/J.7 ~ ! 26A ~ ~ ."Z n "R 50rl f\Ou~ ~: (jJ§fJ 2 )...00 ~0J/ ~ "Ø '). 3. ¡,s'1 @t ~ ~~/ tJ\-s:. '0/ ~ ?1/.3sk TR 5 _,I -- IX) --------- . TR 50J _ .m Aë - -:-- - - TR 50 TR 5D1 ; /0,283 Ac... .45 AC _ a 'I TR 502.. .495 AC ~ . - - -. e e e Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - June 11 1998 4. PS 97-60 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF JIM WALKER FOR A REPLAT OF LOT 1R, BLOCK 2, THOMPSON PARK ESTATES. (LOCATED IN THE 6300 BLOCK OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD) APPROVED Mr. Davis opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Barry Hunsworth, Carroll Consultants, presented this request for Conoco. He stated he concurs with all of staff's issues. Chairman Davis called for additional proponents. Seeing none, he called for any opponents. Mr. Billy Cypert, Director of Buildings and Grounds for Birdville I.S.D., recited excerpts from the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission's laws regarding the sale of alcohol around schools and voiced his concern of Conoco selling beer at this location. Seeing no additional opponents, Vice Chairman Davis closed the public hearing. Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mr. Ferguson, moved to approve PS 97-60 provided no Certificate of Occupancy is issued until the sewer service at the high school is available. The motion carried with a vote of 5 - O. Messrs. Bowen, Ferguson, Davis, Wood & Miller were in favor of this request. Page 2 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes ---J -- -....... .......~.v'-,...." P.Ol ~ )/C-- r--- Engineers 4 Architects 4 land Planners May 21,1996 Ms. Julia W. Skare City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76160 Re: Thompson Pari< Estates Block 2, Lot 1 R Conoco CC Job No. 2971 Dear Ms. Skare: I am in receipt of your comment sheet for the referenced project. We have already started 10 address the comments and would like to resolve them prior to P & Z. 1. We realize that the box culverts are currenlly under construction. I will have a survey crew verify the location of the 24" storm sewer stub by Friday of this week. e 2. All of the storm drain improvements will be located in a drainage easement. We will coordinate the location of the easement with the improvements, both existing and proposed. 3. Acknowledged. 4. Acknowledged. 5. Acknowledged, we will provide your office with the TxDOT application at the appropriate time. 6. Acknowledged. the surveyor's seal and signature will be affixed to the original mylar of the final plat. I will be in attendance at the P & Z meeting. If any further information is required, please advise. ~ BLHlln Cc: Ms. Mia Brown, Canoco e ) 0260 Weslheimer, Sle: 600 .4 ,Houston, Texas 77042 "'~ TeL 7) 3/783-4478 4' Fox 713/783-6002 e e e CITY OF N$RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works May 21, 1998 MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Julia W. Skare, Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS97-60; THOMPSON PARK ESTATES; Block 2, Lot 1 R; Final Plat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on May 20, 1998. The following items are for your consideration. 1. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The Drainage Analysis is required as outlined in the Public Works Design Manual. The location of the storm drain stubout from the box culverts on the BISD site needs to be verified and dimensioned. This will need to be resolved prior to the plat being placed on the City Council Agenda. The box culverts are under construction and have not been approved by the City. 2. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS All storm drain improvements shall be placed in a drainage easement. The location of this easement needs to be verified with the existing storm drainpipe. All storm drain pipe that is conveying surface runoff is to be designed to the Public Works Design Manual criteria and contained in a drainage easement. Item #1 needs to be resolved to accurately describe these easements. 3. SANITARY SEWER The sanitary sewer main is shown to tie into a main located on the BISD property. This line has been constructed, but at this time has not been accepted by the City. The sanitary sewer main must be accepted by the City prior to connection of the sanitary sewer for this lot. 4. DRIVEWAY SPACING The driveway spacing was discussed during the platting of Thompson Park Estates, Block 1, Lots 26R and 27R and the Special Use Permit for this lot. It appears the plans submitted are in compliance with the recommendations made and approved by City Council. 5. TXDOT PERMIT The Plat is bordered by Precinct Line Road (FM 3029), a State Highway. A TxDOT Access Permit will be required. The TxDOT permit application must be submitted to Public Works for approval after the plans are approved and prior to submitting to TxD01. 6. SIGNATURES The surveyor's seal and signature needs to be added to the mylar of the Final Plat. P.O. Box 820609 . North Richland Hills, Texas. 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820· 817·581-5521' FAX 817.656-7538 e e e There are issues with the construction plans that need to be resolved. Public Works is working with the Engineers. A separate co_mment letter will be issued to the Engineers regarding the construction plans. The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer of their responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans. The City's eventual approval of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. JWS/csb/pwm98127 cc: Greg Dickens, Public Works Director Kevin B. Miller, Assistant Public Works Director NRH (PlMMlWCfI(~.~I 1ømo: APPLICATION FOR A REPLAT CItY Of NOM Ricnancf Hili. 7~01 NcMeISI Loop 120 NOM R.Cl\I.1n4 t1ill$. te;¡U 817·5111·5500 Tho~paon Pa k Eatatas ~'It 4.4g11 ONct(gUCl1: Thompaon Pa k K&ta~a5, Lota 1,2 an4 6 portion a£ lot 3 IIfenIe MØ ~gf~1 Bill Souder 305 Rebel Properties 1845 Precinct L1na Prtono No 498-2333 I 581 90 5 Nfmf tnø IV_ Mt1 Ac:IMI.ss 01 o.v.lOper. Canoco 011 nc. Hous~an, T 77210-4784 P.O. Box 47 it Mme~Ñk1"~gf~ Surveyot" Precise Lan Survey1nSI tne 4915 Gus Th masson Rd. Mesqu1te, X 75150 Pnon.No. (281) 293-5468 P~.~ (972) 279-1508 Tlpe 01 ~...tIopmel\( 80"'9 Prop o ~ Roweflfiðl o CÑþû Ro~WJ o ,f/: Ru/øofll,al [i)c CQnvne~11 ¡"Ø04It1f1 o OUIOf ApplicatIOn ~e: · ~1Q1IOt\ Fee NIomOClr øf ~¡¡IIoI~ @ $' ,50 ~ leI!: · fWmoe( of l1CHWC$ÏG.n~llloIS G $5.00 Pfjr .at · NumÞor of weel irllerseClOOn 5;gns @ $65.O<J .ac:n · Covnly pli llilcni f.., $120 $5 TOT.u fEE ~ ~58 ~ /8.s.Ç9 1IIel'00yocrofy In ¡ em. Of "pros.",. 1116 le9al Ownef 0/1110 property aoSCfIOO<2 .00... .ne 00 flO,.01 l"lIm.1 Ilh~ Replfll IQ (fl' Pl.MIlIg 8110 lon. g CottIm'~SIO/IItv ~S.CM~tfCn, (/f,rrK:n '~y,t ,."", 4n pI'OfHlTl Q...n"'~ nomoI ..n.n trIO'. '"<III ""'. o""n., ""~ea J ~H'nOll'1WJ . ( 8 t 7) ~ 6 7 - 04 7 7 .~ o.t~ PrinIIVante: J1111.W. W lleer $.glli/IIII OFFICE USE ONLY Cut ~r Tl&e~ P,j( Uel\5 P,q A$SO'$/Mnt1 Paid e REPLAT co . 40~ (21'6) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Subject: Request of Cook Conslllt~nfs for ~ Fin~1 PI~f of J of 1, Rlor.k 1, Agenda Number: P~ QR-11 Waterford Addition. (Located in the 6200 Block of Glenview Drive) Jack Cook is representing Triad Senior Living in this Final Plat case containing approximately 9.3 acres of land. This property is currently zoned R-7 Multi-family, but the applicant has submitted a request for rezoning as a planned development. The rezoning request is a separate agenda item. The issues associated with this Final Plat are as follows: 1. Wetlands: Portions of this property may be considered as wetlands by the Corps of Engineers. The City must obtain copies of all correspondence between the applicant and the Corps of Engineers that relate to wetland determination. 2. Drainage: Big Fossil Creek is adjacent to the west property line. Significant portions of the property are contained within the 1 DO-year flood plain. The developer is proposing to fill portions of the property to reclaim land area in order to increase the buildable pad site. 3. Street Lighting: The developer has been advised that streetlights are a requirement and will be coordinating these with the City and with cost paid directly to TU Electric. 4. City Limits: A portion of this plat is located in Haltom City. Since there are no improvements in the Haltom City portion, Haltom City has waived their review of the plat (see attached letter). All other engineering comments have been responded to. This plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the City of NRH. The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this request at it's June 11, 1998 meeting and recommended approval subject to engineer's comments and absolute identification of the location of the drainage easements prior to the filing of the plat. RECOMMENDA TION: To approve the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission provided absolute identification of the location of the drainage easements are made prior to the plat being filed with the County. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available g~BUdget = ~ ~ -DaAA~ &,. ~~ Departrlleñt Hea ignature CITY COUNCIL ACTION IT Finance Director Page 1 of - TR 3E 5.445 AC e 16 TR 38 l.39 AC ~~~~ íRl~BL.¡;: W . M. 'SURV~YO p._i52 - e e e Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - June 11, 1998 - 5. PS 98-13 REQUEST OF COOK CONSULTANTS FOR A FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, WA TERFORD ADDITION. (LOCATED IN THE 6200 BLOCK OF GLENVIEW DRIVE) APPROVED Mr. Jack Cook, Cook Consultants, presented this request and stated that he agrees with all of the engineer's comments. Mr. LeBaron stated that staff is about to finalize the drainage easement issue and staff recommends that the plat be moved forward to the Council, insuring that the plat wouldn't be filed until this item was resolved. Mr. Wood, seconded by Mr. Bowen, moved to approve PS 98-13 subject to engineer's comments and absolute identification of the location of the drainage easements prior to the filing of the plat. The motion carried with a vote of 5 _ O. Messrs. Wood, Bowen, Ferguson, Davis & Miller were in favor of this request. Page 3 - 6/11/98 P & Z Minutes e e - /--~ ì il fi l~ 4 i '-- I COOK Consultants, Inc. 12250 Inwood Road, Suite 10 Dallas, Texas 75244 (972) 387-1890 fax (972) 387-8210 June 2, 1998 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Rich land Hills 76182-0609 Re: Wateñord Addition; Block I, Lot I; Final Plat Commissioners: We have reviewed Julia Skare's letter dated May 22 listing the staff review comments for this subdivision and find these conditions acceptable. Please approve this plat with the understanding we are complying with all comments presented in the staffs' review letter. If you need any additional information regarding this matter, please contact this office. ;wmr Texas Registration No. 46917 civil & structural eng·i~'~'~r'~·":"'t~'~d"s~r'~~~'~rs _ land planners CITY OF N$RTH RICHLAND HILLS e Public Works May 22, 1998 MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Julia W. Skare, Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS98-13; WATERFORD ADDITION; Block 1, Lot 1; Final Plat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on May 4, 1998. The following items are for your consideration. Public Works feels this plat may be placed on the P & Z Agenda for consideration, although the drainage easement should be finalized prior to the plat being placed on the City Council Agenda. 1. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The drainage area map must contain contours to verify all drainage areas. The off site drainage area map and the on site map are not consistent. This must be resolved with the next submittal. e 2. WETLANDS Documentation should be provided to the City showing correspondence to the COE and their response. 3. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS The location of the existing 1 DO-year floodplain for Big Fossil Creek needs to be shown on the grading plan. The location of the 1 DO-year ultimate flood plain needs to be clearly indicated on the plans. This must be included on the next plat submittal as well as on the plans. This was previously requested and has not been provided. All public storm drain improvements are to meet the criteria in the Public Works Design Manual and be contained in a drainage easement. The plat and plans need to be revised with the next submittal. 4. OFF SITE EASEMENTS The need for off site easement will be determined after additional information is provided on the utility plan. If required, all off site easements and exhibits need to be prepared and forwarded to the Public Works Department for review. The signed easements need to be transmitted to the Public Works Department for filing with the approved Final Plat. -- 5. ROW The distance from the back of curb to the ROW line must also be clearly indicated on the site plan. A minimum of 9.5 feet is required. Additional ROW may need to be dedicated. This needs to be resolved with the next submittal. P.O. Box 820609 . North Richland Hills, Texas. 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820· 817-581-5521. FAX 817-656-7538 e 6. SITE PLAN The required site plan per the Public Works Design Manual as part of the Civil Construction Plans submitted with the plat did not indicate the location and curb return radii of the driveway approach as previously requested. 7. STREET LIGHTING Street Lighting is required by Section 1-06 of the Design Manual. The locations of any existing streetlights need to be shown on the topographical drawing to confirm compliance with current ordinances. Any additional streetlights that may be required based on current ordinances, needs to be coordinated with Public Works and TU Electric. The developer will pay the cost for installation of any additional streetlights directly to TU Electric. 8. ENGINEERS CERTIFICATION A signed Engineers Certification (such as the one included in the Subdivision Ordinance) needs to be included with the drainage calculation sheet in the construction plans. 9. DETAILS All appropriate details for services will need to be included in the construction plans. There are several details that have not been included. 10. INSPECTION FEES Inspection fees will be due prior to starting construction. The current rate is four (4%) percent for water and sewer and three (3%) percent for streets and drainage. e This review was based on preliminary plans and was therefore only cursory. The intention of this letter is to comment on items of significant importance to the general concept. A detailed review will be processed when the final plans are submitted. There are numerous comments regarding the engineering and construction plans. The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer of their responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans. The City's eventual approval of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. JWS/csb/pwm98129 cc: Greg Dickens, Public Works Director Kevin B. Miller, Assistant Public Works Director e e e /ÎL ~-,.... - ~, 19qa S~ }~ ',~ 1 = Y E .~ . -- S J -r 'J 0? r-J.;.\J....,-r 0J'.JJ SJ-r 'J February 5, 1998 Ms. Julia W. Skare, P.E. City of North Richland Hills: P.O.Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 Dear Ms. Skare: The property located in Haltom City known as tracts 3B20 & 3B1, W.M. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, is not required to be rezoned or platted so long as there is no development on the site in our corporate limits. In other words, if there is no development that occurs on the land located in Haltom City, we have no mechanism in place to require that the property be zoned or platted. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, H~ Karen K. Mitchell Director of Community Development 5024 Broadway Avenue. P.O. Box 14246. Haltom City, Texas 76117-0246 817/834-7341 Metro 817/429-0702 FAX 817/834-7237 e e e Cily of North Richland Hills 7301 N_E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 817·581·5515 Application Type: I i Preliminary Plat Application for Subdivision Plat Approval (PI.ä.. prim .1 rupon,..) =xJ Final Pial ~ l_~ Replat : Short Form Property Owner Information: Name 01 Property Owner: Capital Senior Development --.-- Phone No. (972) 770-5600 Address 01 Property Owner: 14160 Drill rI" Prlrhmy} Suit~__ City: Dallas State: Texas Proposed Subdivision Name: Ní~H DAmended Plat Zip: 75240 The Water ford Addition No. of Acres in Plat: No. of Lots in Plat: 9Q292 1 Authorized Agent Information: "Note: An affidavit signed by the property owner is required when the agent is not the property owner" Name 01 Authorized Agent: Cook Consultants, Inc. Phone No. ---.... --- Address: 12250 InwoGd Rd.~-.-ltl-º-______________________ City: Dallas State: Texas --_..~-- Surveyor / Engineer Information: Name 01 Firm: Coo~onsultaQ~~~~ Phone No. ~_.. -.--..-.-.. ---- Address: _ _ _ _ _!?~~~l~~<?..~c!_R~_!. Sui t~._~lO________ . - --. - <-. -- --.-- -..-. .----- City: . .__ .-Dallas Slate: Texrl" Contact Person: _J~ck~Cook ~II, R.P.L.S., P.E. -.-..-- Plat Fee Calculation: All Preliminary Plats - a, Application Fee: b. 51.50 perresidential/ol or 55_00 per commercial acre: Tolal Fee: All Replats, Short Form Plats, and Final Plats a. Application Fee: $ 120.00 b, 51.50 perresidentiallot All Amended Plats a, Applicalion Fee: b. County ptat filing fee: Total Fee: 5120,00 --. -- or 5500 per commercial acre: c. 565,00 for each slreel intersection: d. County pIal filing fee: $58.00 . -- 46.46 --------- ---'-- .--- Total Fee: $ 224. 4.q Time Waiver Request: (optional) The applicant is alVare that action on this plat may not lake place for more than thirty (30) days and waives all time requirements lor approval 01 Signature: _..- _. ...- ".- I certify that I am, or represent, the owner 01 the property described above and hereby submit this subdivision plJI to thlJ City of North Richland Hills fa Dale: __Man:1L.l2~9..98 Your name (Printed Name):~ Jack C. Cook I II (972) 387-1890 Zip: 75244 _ (972) 387-1890 Zip: 7';744 (none) $58.00 . $58,00 ..-. >Signalure:_~ ð ~.AJ'-IJ Subdivision Plat Application ?S· C) tì ·/"b4 CD-41B(1-9B) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Subject: Appointment~ to Crime Control ~ncf Prevention ni~trid Agenda Number: ~N ~R-RR (Postponed at the June 22, 1998 Council Meeting) Appointments need to be made by Council to fill Places 1, 3, and 6 on the Crime Control and Prevention District. These positions were previously held by Tommy Brown, Mack Garvin, and Byron Sibbet as it has been Council policy that all Crime Control District Board Members be current members of the Council. These appointments are two year terms that expire September 1. Councilwoman Johnson's term (Place 5) will be expiring September 1, 1998. It is being recommended that the following Council members be appointed to fill these positions: Mayor Scoma, Councilman Mitchell, Councilman Metts, Councilman Milano. . RECOMMENDA TION: To appoint to the Crime Control and Prevention District Mayor Scoma to Place 1, Councilman Mitchell to Place 3, Councilman Metts to Place 5 and Councilman Milano to Place 6, terms of office to expire September 1,2000. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other _ - 'tJþ¿¡ci¡¿¿- ~~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Subject: Appointments to Park and Recreation Facilities Agenda Number: GN 98-67 Development Corporation (Postponed at the June 22, 1998 Council Meeting) The following Board of Directors' terms have expired on the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation: Place 1 Place 5 Place 7 Councilwoman Cheryl Lyman Mr. Don Tipps Mr. Danny Blankenship An appointment also needs to be made to fill the position vacated by Tommy Brown (Place 3). Either the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem should occupy the Place 3 position since the Bylaws stipulate that the Chairman of the Board shall be one of the two. According to the Articles of Incorporation, Places 1 and 3 are to be members of the City Council and Places 5 and 7 are to be persons who are not members of the City Council and who are not employees of the City (citizen members). The term of office for places 1, 5 and 7 would expire May 2000. The individual appointed to Place 3 would fill the unexpired term of office, which will expire May 1999. The following are being recommended for appointment: Place 1 Place 3 Place 5 Place 7 Mayor Pro T em Phifer Mayor Charles Scoma Mr. Dave Davis Mr. Oscar Trevino term expires 5/2000 term expires 5/99 term expires 5/2000 term expires 5/2000 RECOMMENDA TION: To appoint to the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation, Mayor Pro Tem Phifer to Place 1, Mr. Dave Davis to Place 5, Mr. Oscar Trevino to Place 7, terms expiring 5/2000, to appoint to Mayor Scoma to Place 3, term expiring 5/2000. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available þ~ting Budget = I T::¿c2átærd ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION Finan.. Dw.clor Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .epartment: City Secretary Subject: Appointments to Bo¡¡rd5ì'Commi5ì5ìion5ì Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Agenda Number: GN 98-68 At the June 22 City Council Meeting, the Council made some of the appointments to the City's Boards and Commissions whose terms are expiring June 30. The remainder of the appointments were to be made during July. The following individuals have been recommended for appointment at this Council Meeting: Beautification Commission Place 2 Jeanne Lueck Place 6 Theresa Hampton Board of Adjustment Place 2 Board of Appeals Place 2 Place 6 . Cable TV Board Place 2 Place 6 Library Board Place 2 Place 6 Rick Enlow Roxanne Bryant Michael Augustin Robert O'Reilly Deborah Bowman Vickie Leslie Lynn Waller Parks & Recreation Board Place 2 Sherry Milano Place 6 Dwayne Leslie term expires 6/30/2000 term expires 6/30/2000 term expires 6/30/2000 term expires 6/30/2000 term expires 6/30/2000 term expires 6/30/2000 term expires 6/30/2000 term expires 6/30/2000 term expires 6/30/2000 term expires 6/30/2000 term expires 6/30/2000 Planning & Zoning Commission and Capital Improvement Advisory Committee Place 2 Doug Blue term expires 6/30/2000 Alternate Ron Lueck term expires 6/30/1999 Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget _ ~e;~~~n.tur. ~~Õ~ CITY COUNCIL A-;;;;:r,¡¡M Page 1 of Finance Review Finance Dftctor CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . .een Court Advisory Board Place 2 Tami Spraggins term expires 6/30/2000 Town Hall Committee Place 2 Place 6 Jim Mace Greg Werking term expires 6/30/2000 term expires 6/30/2000 Animal Control Shelter Advisory Committee Place 2 Lyle E. Welch term expires 6/30/2000 Recommendation: That the appointments listed on GN 98-68 be approved. . i CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM P~np of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 07/13/98 Subject: Appointments to the Youth Advisory Committee Agenda Number: GN 98-69 When the Youth Advisory Committee was created, Council charged the Committee with developing an application process for future committees. On March 23,1998, the Youth Advisory Committee presented Council with three alternatives. The alternative selected requires that the Committee solicit applications and prepare a slate of candidates to be recommended to Council. Five high schools (Richland, Haltom, Shannon, FW Christian, and Nolan) would be given two alternating two-year terms, and the rest would be at-large, serving for one year. This guarantees that at least five members will be returning each year, promoting continuity. At their June 11, 1998 meeting, the Youth Advisory Committee approved the slate of candidates below for next year to be recommended to City Council. This was a very difficult decision for them to make. All schools listed in the by-laws are represented except for the Shannon Learning Center. We did not receive any applications from students at this institution. Last Name First Name Age School Batenhorst Sara 16 Nolan Williams Lindy 17 Haltom Harding David 16 Richland Stowolski Billy 14 Nolan Trevino Vanessa 15 Richland Ortega Tony 15 Nolan Hallford Jon 18 Richland McCarten Kristen 16 Richland Clary Stefani 15 FW Christian Evans Christina 17 Haltom Stewart Blair 15 Richland Miller Rebekah 15 Richland Fisher Meagan 15 Richland Kirk Cody 15 Richland Hang Robert 15 Haltom Wood Ashley 15 Richland Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available - I FlMnce Dnctor Page 1 of · Of these, Billy Stowolski, Stefani Clary, Blair Stewart, Rebekah Miller, and Robert Hang are recommended for the two year terms. This represents one from each school, except Richland, which has two. The second Richland representative replaces the Shannon representative. . The Committee believes that these candidates represent the diversity requested by the Council. The recommended list includes eight returning members (in bold) and eight new members. The charts below represent the diversity as to school and age. Percentage of Students by School Percentage of Students by Age Nolan 19% FW Christian 6% Richland 56% 16 19% 17 13% 18 14 6% 6% e Once selected, staff will work with the new members to organize a team building session and a leadership training for the officers. We will schedule a meeting for later this month to welcome the members, and set the meeting day for the upcoming year. RECOMMENDATION That Council appoint the list of candidates recommended by the Youth Advisory Committee. e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Subject: Appointments to Civil Service Commission Agenda Number: GN 98-70 Several of the Civil Service Commission members terms have expired. These appointments are mayoral appointments with confirmation by two-thirds of the Council. The Mayor has appointed the following: Appointee Ms. Sally Hackfeld Mr. Bill Baker Mr. Tom Peterson Mr. Bob Marks Mr. Smitty Clevinger Position Place 1 Place 2 Place 4 Alternate Alternate Term Expires 6/99 6/99 6/2000 6/99 6/99 Recommendation: That the appointments listed on GN 98-70 be approved. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget _ er t¿lt;uUa.., ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION Finance Director Page 1 of I . Department: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Economic Development Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Subject: Presentation of Preliminary Financial Plan Agenda Number: & Preliminary Project Plan and Calling a Public Hearing to Create a Richland Plaza Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone GN 98-75 On April 27, Council received the Conceptual Financial Plan to create a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District in and around the 42-acre Richland Plaza shopping center development-and authorized staff to begin preparing the preliminary financing plan and project plan. You will recall that such a district was proposed to help fund the approximately $950,000 more than the original Mackey Creek Channel Improvements passed in the City's 1985 Bond Election. Upon creation of a TIF District, the existing tax value in the designated district would be temporarily frozen-with all additional improvements dedicated to paying of the Mackey Creek north channel improvements. The project will be debt financed, with the life of the TIF proceeding until the bonds are retired. And while all five taxing entities appear to be willing to help share the burden of paying for these improvements, the City assumes bond oversight and accountability. Since our last discussion, staff has delivered the Conceptual Financial Plan to each of the other four local taxing entities and worked with representatives of First Southwest to prepare the attached preliminary financial plan and preliminary project plan for your review and comment-as required by State law. 'ith your acceptance of these two proposed plans, staff will provide 50-day notice to each of the other taxing entities of Council's plan to hold a public hearing on the creation of a tax increment reinvestment zone on Monday, September 14, 1998 (as also required in the Tax Increment Financing Act). Each taxing entity will have 15 days after our notification to designate a representative to meet with the City and begin discussing the specifics of the proposed TIF District in greater detail. Likewise, City staff must formally present the preliminary plans to the governing body of each taxing entity prior to the public hearing. RECOMMENDATION That Council accept the Richland Plaza TIF District preliminary financing plan and project plan, call a public hearing for Monday, September 14 and authorize staff to provide the required 60-day notice to each of the other four taxing entities. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available .ø¡W:;Udget A) 00 . ./ ~rtment Head'S'gnatu," . - CITY COUNCIL ACTION EM Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Subject: Waive Collection of NRH Water and Wastewater Impact Fees for Birdville High School Agenda Number:PW 98-12 The Birdville High School being constructed at the southwest corner of Precinct Line Road and Mid-Cities Boulevard will require three meters; 6-inch domestic, 4-inch domestic and 4-inch irrigation meter. The total amount of $106,852.44 is required for all connection fees, deposits, service charges, Fort Worth Impact/Access Fees, and NRH Impact Fees. The Fort Worth Impact/Access Fees will have to be paid to Fort Worth (paid by either BISD or the City's Utility Fund). The NRH water and wastewater impact fees associated with these three meters total $46,410. These fees represent a portion of the monies described in the Impact Fee Study to be collected to fund the Impact Fee Capital Improvements Program. The less the City collects, the less the City will have to reimburse the developers or the City itself for the future Impact Fee CIP project improvements. A letter from BISD Superintendent Bob Griggs is attached. He has requested the City waive all charges to BISD on this high school project, except those charges which are actual costs to the City which they will have to pay. If the NRH impact fees were subtracted, BISD would pay $60,442.44. Recommendation: That the collection of NRH Water and Wastewater Impact Fees totalling $46,410 be waived from Birdville Independent School District on the Birdville High School project. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other j .' Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaDle ~~ ~ Finance Director Page 1 of · Bob E, Gnggs. Ecl.D, S"¡:.ermter.¿ent · · lIS) Birdville Independent School District 6125 East Belknap' Haltom City, Texas 76117·817-831-5700· Fax 817-838-7261 . http://www.birdville,kI2.tx.us It is.... June 11, 1998. And Birdville ISO is... Influencing History Today! RECEJVED JUN 2 ,) 19% Mr. Larry Cunningham City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Dear Mr. Cunningham: By the time you receive this letter (upon return from Texas Municipal League), I hope I have been able to discuss the issue with you by telephone. Enclosed are several items of correspondence that relate to water/sewer service to the new high school construction. From the highlights on these documents, you can observe several "impact" fees are being assessed BISO by the city. It is my hope that all costs with the exception of actual costs realized by the City of North Richland Hills would be waived on this new facility. If I can provide additional information, do not hesitate to call. ~í.~ Bob E. Griggs Su perin tend en t c Fred Wilson Bill Cypert . NAME: PROPERTY ADDRESS: SUBDIVISION: B ìR D V I l-U3 TH (eo 1-1-/ 6 H SCHúÒLJ....OT: I BLOCK: I . o RESIDENTIAL 0 COMMERCIAL 0 INDUSTRIAL ~AS THE OWN!:'" FiLED AN :NDUS7R\Al WASTE QU!:STiON.AjRE IN THE LAST 5 MOI'.THS? If NO., FiLL Olfi AT COUNì=i~ '3', PHONE: 7G o/;~ I , ) 'çLCJ :-··'t I < ( CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS WATER & SEWER CONNECTION CHECKLIST ) I J SIZE: ~ DOMESTIC WATER ):&PEVELOPED o UNDEVELOPED SIZE: IRRIGATION WATER 3/4" FIRE SPRINKLER SIZE: SEI¡'E,~ )8:(OEVELOPED o UNDEVELOPED o DEVELOPED o UNDEVELOPED o DEVELOPED . METER <{IT ~ STA- ... 7'f- ¿;3 IRRJGATION FIRE SPRJNKLER CONNECTION ..J. Water iz40(J ,ð7) Sewer 5(),Q() -0- .0- F1W ACCESS -;; I "'8 em. 4-+ . Water .0- Sewer q ~// 99 .0- .0- NRHIMPACT ri Water '8 /35. DO .0- Sewer 4& ~~. ()C -0- ..0- Sub Total 2F!740,3'i DEPOSIT 6'30.0Ó Service Charge 'h,OO Misc. Charge TOTAL ZqZ 7t=J,3~/ I I GRAND TOTAL IZQ275311 This Quote is based on information that was available at the time of our conversation. If meter size should change or street cuts are needed, it is not included in this bid. When bids are over and you have the contract, please call and I will write up your official Deposit Quote. Di!veloped Service - A developed service is where the developer installs the tap, service line, meter box for wa1er, tapping saddle, and service line stubout for sewer. Undeveloped Service - An undeveloped service is where the City installs the tap, service line, meter box, meter for water. tapping saddle, and service line stubout for sewer, edditional Ex~nses - Additional expenses which are not included in the service connection fees are boring costs, service ne costs in excess of 50 feet, and street cut costs, . QUQTED BY, QUOTE DATE: ~ QUOTE EXPIRATION OATE, ."f/.;}4 /1 s> wschccJ(,/st I " CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS WATER & SEWER CONNECTION CHECKLIST PG Yc. ;/ NAME: . PROPERTY ADDRESS: SUBDIVISION:"B /I~D'v'1 LLê 77-fLt? D 1+, 6:.' /-f o RESIDENTIAL 0 COMMERCIAL 0 INDUSTRIAL PHONE: LOT: I BLOCK: / SIZE: 02 ~ DOMESTIC WATER 4/1 SIZE: IRRIGATION WATER þ(DEVELOPED o UNDEVELOPED i"AS TH: OWN:R '=:L:O A.... iNO\,;S,RtA:.. WAST: OU:S,IOMJR: IN THE LAS, 5 MO~(T;-;S? IF N07, !':LL Oui AT COU~(T:R ~' 3/4" FIRE SPRINKLER SIZE: SEWER ~DEVELOPED o UNDEVELOPED ~EVELOPED o UNDEVELOPED o DEVELOPED . METER {p II lQ S71i 1-l5 r /( ) IRRJGA TION FIRE SPRJNKLER CONNECTION '-i'l Water 3~OO·av ¡( <f() 0. (7) Sewer _5lJ I 0 0 -0- ..0- FTW ACCESS '171 z. 5¿ - 3 gg¡,44 Water -0- Sewer Iq 33~/O1 ..0- ..0- NRH IMPACT Water I & ~ 0_c),ÒO 'ð /~,5,OG 4 Sewer ef 2.49.00 -D. ..0- Sub Total .55/1 / '-/. C, 3 / '/~c¡ J,¿J¿ 7 DEPOSIT 7fUO,00 150.('( Sef\IÏce Charge 5.ro 5,((, Mise, Charge r '"T=i - TOTAL & 2.~2-q ~~~ 1/ '-1-74 7l/- fJ GRAND TOTAL 177577011 This Quote is based on information that was available at the time of our conversation. If meter size should change or street cuts are needed, it is not included in this bid, When bids are over and you have the contract, please call and I wiÏI wn'te up your official Depostt Quote. Develo~d Service - A developed service is where the developer installs the tap, service line, meter box for wa1er. tapping saddle, and service lin.e stubout for sewer. Undevelo~d Service - An undeveloped service is where the City installs tile tap, service fine, meter box, meter for water, tapping saddle, and service line stubout for sewer. .~dditional Expenses - Additional expenses wtlich are not included in the service connection fees are boring costs, service ine cost5 in excess of 50 feet. and s1reet cut cost5. / ¡ n 1 r! {J? ;:; b ¿ /c¡ ~ OUOTED BY, '1M/~~ OUOTE DATE: ~ OUOTE EXPIRATION DATE: ~ wscI'w:ck.ls t CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Department: Public Works Subject: Waive Property Owners' Cost Participation on Colorado Boulevard Road Humps Councif Meeting Date: 7/13/98 Agenda Number: PW 98-13 Colorado Boulevard from Harwood Road south to Grapevine Highway is eligible for the installation of road humps. Two issues in accordance with Ordinance No. 1921 need to be addressed prior to placement of the road humps. 1. The City will need to notify all adjacent property owners of the proposed action and ask for a written response in support or objection. If less than 20% of the property owners object, installation can proceed. 2. The collection of material cost for the road humps from the property owners on this section of Colorado Boulevard. The property owners are required to pay for the material cost and the City provides the labor. Residents of this street requested in December 1997 that the roadway be closed, creating a "dead end" roadway. Council consensus was to leave the roadway open and let the residents petition for road humps if they desired. Councilwoman Johnson mentioned that the City might pay for the road humps, but this comment was not followed up on by any other Council Member. After another request from one of the residents for the City to pay for the road humps, Councilwoman Johnson asked that this be placed on the agenda for consideration. The City's payment of road humps is contrary to the conditions set out in the ordinance regulating road humps. Recommendation: Deny waiving the adjacent property owners' cost participation for the proposed road humps on Colorado Boulevard from Harwood Road to Grapevine Highway. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaDfe ~ Finance Director Page 1 of . . . Page Four PROCEDURES FOR ROAD HUMP INSTALLATION 1. The initial request for the installation of road humps must originate from the residents living on the street. A request in writing from a resident or representative must be forwarded to: Road Hump Program Director of Public Works City of North RicWand Hills P.O. Box 820609 North RicWand Hills, Texas 76180 2. A preliminary determination of eligibility based on available traffic data will be made in a timely manner. A. If the street is determined not to be eligible the applicants will be notified in writing giving the reason. B. The decision may be appealed in writing to the Director of Public Works within 15 days of the notification date. The Director will review the determination and respond to the applicants within 30 days of the appeal request. C. If the street is determined to be eligible for consideration, a meeting will be arranged between the applicants and staff to define the petition area, the approximate road hump location range. The applicants will be instructed to submit a petition indicating that a minimum of two-thirds of the low density dwelling households on the street support the installation of road humps as provided in the Road Hump Ordinance. Only petition forms supplied by the City of North Richland Hills or exact duplicates may be used for this purpose. 3. After verification of the petitions, the Department will conduct the necessary transportation engineering studies and solicit comments and recommendations of other agencies. A determination of the street's eligibility for road hump installation will be made in a timely manner, based on the Road Hump Ordinance. A. If the street is determined not to be eligible for road hump installation, the applicants will be notified in writing giving the reason. . . . Page Five B. C. The decision may be appealed in the same manner as in Section 2. If the street is determined to be eligible, the street will be placed on a list of streets eligible for road hump installation. 4. The City of North RicWand Hills will make a determination of the total installation cost. 5. Once eligible for road hump installation, owners of real property lying within the notification area will be notified of the action by the City of North RicWand Hills. The notification area consists of all property with frontage on the street. The notice will include a return form to indicate support or objection to the proposed installation. (Section 3, paragraph 5., revised per Ordinance No. 2027, 11/28/94) 6. If owners of20 percent or more of the real property within the notification area object to the installation within 30 days of the notice, then the street will be removed from the list of streets eligible for road hump installation and a public hearing will be scheduled at the City Council. Notification of the hearing will include the applicant(s) and owners ofreal property within the notification area. In addition, a reasonable effort will be made to notify each low density residential household along the street and area neighborhood associations of the public hearing. 7. If objections from less than 20 percent of the real property within the notification area are received or the City Council approves the installation after a public hearing, then the City of North Richland Hills will place the street on a list of streets approved for road hump installation. 8. Once a street is placed on the list of streets approved for road hump installation the City will submit a statement to the representative of the residents for the cost of the road hump installation. Upon receipt of payment of the cost, the humps will be installed as scheduling permits. If full payment has not been received within one year from the statement date, the street will be removed from the list of streets approved for road hump installation and all monies received, if any, returned to the payor. Until further order of the Council by ordinance, the speed humps price will be as listed below: Two humps - $500.00 Three humps - $650.00 Four Humps - $800.00 . Page Six After the initial year, the City may review the prices and revise them based on actual staff data. If no changes are recommended by staff, these prices will be used until formal modification by Council. . . -0 >'-0 Page Seven c.-- co .¡J I co.-- 0 CO ~ en en '''; co ZtzJ ~ U 0 Q) 0 ~ c c .c: He!(/)- ,::¡; ~ Q) .¡J E-fCl I p" . ~ :jtzJE-f '''; .¡J 0 ~::z: ~CO Z ~Co:J en .-- ~E-f0 H 06- ,....¡ E-fUJ~ 0 0 UJo W 0 .¡J....¡ C"') ::Z:u Z ::r: .¡J t' H 0 U Q) en ::r: en E:>, p" en >< () .-- z Q)....¡ .-- ,::¡; .¡J.-- '''; - CO 0 ::r: ,....¡ W tTtp" ~ CO ~ '''; -0 ~X ....¡ -=x: .--o.. c ~ .¡J .QE: CO ~CI.. '''; Cx:I c 0 ::3 .-- E-fO c ~ Q) ::r: .c: UJ tzJ '''; Cx:I Q).¡J-o U ::Z:E-fU ::r: ~ 0 CO ....¡ H::Z:::Z:Q) 8 .¡JCO ~ OtzJen Q) ~>, Oa:Clco µ,. .Qen .¡J .c: E-fCl..HQ) H UJ.-- Q) Q)'''; .¡J :W::::Z:tzJP" Q O.c:U ~ OHa:...... z 00 -o.¡JQ) Zoo ,::¡; ~.c: ,....¡ tzJ en ,::¡; CO.¡J ~\O en 0 Ot' ::z: W W '''; en C 0 c:t:: c:t:: .¡JCCO >. == 0 ,::¡; ::z: '''; 0 .c: .¡JX ø., 0 Z 0 .¡J '''; .¡J ·...¡8 ,::¡; 0 H Q) en U E-f A..,.; ~ H 8 H :> Q) ..en H E-f CD°.c: ~.-- 8 tzJ '''; ~ .¡J o.-- Cx:I . Co .c: a. 0 .¡J.,.; C&:I p" .¡JQ)en co::r: a: Co C :J Cx:I Š .c:Q) '''; -0 E-f tTt.¡J '''; f!:( ::r: -oc 8 =: C .¡J ~ CO ::z: '''; .¡J ~ o.-- e! Z . CI C C CO CO O.c: H H:J ~ o tTt .c: a. uu UJ 0 0 en ....¡ .¡J '''; en>< a: a. en -0 >, E~ e,,~ E: c.Q CO Zz ::3 .¡J CO ~.c: H-=x: .c:CO.¡J~ tTt.¡J H::r: .c:enO o ~ cj8 -o.¡J~~ ~ 0 C'- 2 ~-o P"Z 8 ~ C/) 0 ~ -g c·...¡ a. .. - Cx:I _8 ~CO::3~ E:o +J :J ::3('\ Q 0 8Cx:1 O+'OQ) ::r:oo -.i Cx:I ZCx:I ~enCD~ ~ ~ -=x: a: c ~.-- a. -00.. Co U8 o -0 co.-- CO 0 - en ,::¡;C/) o 0 H ~Cx:I '''; C H.,.; ~H tzJ ::r: +'::1 .¡J ~ 8 ::r: '''; C a: 08 .¡J . Q)H.¡J::1 0 Z 0 ~Z a. en-o .¡J µ,. p,,0 >. OQ) Z :J .Q . U.-- en 0 uC/) Q) ~ .-- E C/) uZ ~ ....¡ CO ~ c:t:: 00 Q) Q).¡J 0 Cx:I ZH .c: .c: en ~ p" :J8 +' C :J -0 ....¡ c 8 o-l8 Q) c 0 U HH C '''; Q) '''; UJ ,::¡; ,::¡;8 . tTt .Q .¡J UJ 8 en '''; Q) ....¡ tzJ Z OZ en .¡J.-- .¡J a: 0 a:H ~ co.-- Q) CI U 0 Q) a..,.; a. CI Cx:I Uc.ð -0 '''; ~ ~ Cx:I C () c ::r: ~en ::1 ....¡ en ~ 8 Cx:I .¡Jo.. :J en w::r: Q) ~ E: .¡J H enu .c: CO ::3 Q) ,::¡;a: 8 o...c: c:t:: 0 W:J ::r: H::r: .... ,.."" r \ . . - ~~ ~ ~ .----. ~f."L'NO ~/IIZ êd.?:¡ClL &?/~n~:U,>,- 1>.... .,.. '" ~ . 7301 NE Loop 820 North Rich land Hills, Texas 76180 To: Lany 1. Cunningham, City Manager From: Andy Wallace, President NRHPA Date: January 30, 1998 Subject: Request to Establish Certification Incentive Pay for Police Officers Dear Mr. Cunningham, In 1991, the NRH City Council approved payment for certam educational achievements. An Associate Degree was to merit $50 per month, as would 60 college semester hours. A Bachelors Degree was to merit $100 per month. If one chose to accept the $50 per month for 60 semester hours, without first attaining the Associate Degree, he/she was granted only four years to acquire the Bachelors Degree, or payments ceased. We currently have 21 officers with Associate Degrees (or who have 60 semester hours) and 17 officers with Bachelors. The Police Association is respectfully requesting that you and the City Council review this proposal for Certification Pay for police officers. A survey was conducted by the NRHP A from the list of cities provided by the Human Resources Department. The results are given below in the table provided. We have also met with Assistant City Manager Randy Shiflet, who indicated that the sales tax projections for this year look good. We have also · met with Chief McGlasson, who advised that he would support this proposal. During the survey, each of the ten Agencies were asked several questions: 1. Do you have educational pay for police and, if so, how much? 2. Do you have certificate pay for police and, if so, how much? 3. Do you require a degree to become a police officer and what type? City Educ. Pay Cert. Pay Degree Required Arlington No No (Det. Pay) Yes (Bachelors) Bedford No I-$SO A-$lOO M-$lSO No CarroUton A-$SO B-$lOO 1-$50 A-$lOO Yes (Assoc.) Denton A-$60 B-$120 M-$180 1-$60 A-$120 M-$180 No Duncanville J No 1-$50 A-$lOO M-$150 No Eu!ess (*) A-$SO B-$lOO 1-$20 A-$40 M-$60 No Grapevine No 1-$50 A-$75 M-$lOO Yes (Bachelors) Hurst No 1-$40 A-$60 M-$80 No Irving (*) A-$60 B-$lOO M-$120 A-$60 No Lewisville B-$100 M-$lS0 I-$SO A-$IOO M-$ISO No e Educational Pay: A-Associates, B-BacheJors, M-Masters Ce!1ificate Pay: I-Intermediate, A-Advanced, M-Master (.) EuJess and Irving give combined Educational and Certificate Pay Arlington gives $100 a month for Detective pay As evidenced by the survey, with the exception of Arlington, whose pay scale is much higher than NRH because of the degree requirements, we are the only department among the cities surveyed that does not give incentive pay for completion of peace officer certificates. Levels of certification are established by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Standards and Education (TCLEOSE). A basic license is required in order to become a peace officer in Texas. No levels above basic are required by the State. (See attached certification chart). e We are proposing that North RicWand Hills pay police officers $50 for Intermediate, $100 for Advanced and $150 for masters certificates, as over .r PEA CE OFFICER CERTlFICA TION . Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards & Education . ~: Requirements for Upper Level Certification INTERMEDIATE CERTIFICATE - Education & A. A. B.A. Training Points 20 40 SO Degree 120 Degree . . . . Years of Law Enforcement 8 6 4 4 2 2 ADV ANCED CERT1FfCA TE Education & A. A. B.A. M.A. Training Points 40 60 Degree 120 Degree Degree Years of Law ,.... forcement 12 9 9 6 6 4 MASTER PEACE OFFICER CERTIFICATE Education & A.A. B.A. M.A. Doctoral Training Points 60 Degree 120 Degree 165 Degre-e 200 Degree Years of Law Enforcement 20 20 15 15 12 12 10 10 *20 CLASSROOM TRAINING HOURS 1 POINT < " 2 1 COLLEGE SEMESTER HOUR a 1 POINT - . . e " half of the cities surveyed do. We are no.t requesting that officers be paid both educational and certificate pay, although two of the surveyed cities do so. If an officer has both a degree and some type of certificate, the officer would only be paid the higher of the two. Administrative services personnel -. compiled a current list of officers and the certificates they have completed: Master - 15 Advanced - 31 (4 near completion) Intermediate - 6 (12 near completion) Using this list, the cost for implementation would be $79,800. However, several of these officers receive educational pay. Unless the city decided to pay officers for both, this would reduce the cost of implementation to approximately $55,000 per year. We believe that the city of North Richland Hills Management and City Council have shown in the past that they care about their police officers and strive to keep them competitive with local agencies, By implementing this request for certificate pay, this would keep our officers "in-line" with other local agencies. If you have any questions about this proposal, please feel rree to contact me anytime. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Respectfully submitted, 12t;JdL- Sgt. Andy Wallace President, NRHP A - . - - . ~.. .' ':ê'f .., INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. I,R 98-134 . ~ Date: T Subject: July 13, 1998 Youth Advisory Committee Final Report Attached is the final report of the 1997 -98 Youth Advisory Committee. This inaugural year has been a great success, with much of the groundwork being laid for the future committees. Accomplishments this year include; · Adoption of by-laws · Creation óf application process · Adoption of long-term service project · Several high-visibility monthly service projects · Selection of next year's candidates Committee members wish to express their gratitude for the opportunity to serve and to learn. Several members will be in attendance at the July 13,1998 Council meeting. Respectfully Submitted, ~J4 ~ames D. Saint Assistant to the City Manager ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS . . e Report of the Youth Advisory Committee For the City of North Richland Hills The new Youth Advisory Committee for the City of North Richland Hills has been a great succèss. At the first meeting, we discussed our budget for future costs. For example, it was decided to design and purchase shirts for members to wear at committee events. One of the first public appearances was Head for the Hills. This was our first adventure to participate in. All went well, even though the weather took a turn for the worse and the activity was rained out. "Make a Difference Day" was our next event. Committee members painted address numbers on the curbs of 'Meals on Wheels' recipients. What started out as small talk with the elderly, ended up to be great conversation. At the Volunteer Fair, which was held at Richland High School, we were educated about many places you can volunteer and at the same time, have great fun. Like Make a Difference Day, it proved that you could make someone's lives better and have a great time while doing so. By-laws were next on out to do list. This took up most of our time for the fact that it was not only for the present committee, but also for the committee in the future. In addition, we set up a set of rules and regulations that the committee, as a whole, should follow. In February, the Youth Advisory Committee developed an application process to get a better perspective of the upcoming members. We hope to get a wide variety of members with this system. The application process was approved by the City Council on March 23,1998. For a long term community service project, the committee chose Critter Connection. After going through a long training process, the committee is ready to accept the challenge. We hope it is a success just like our year has been. As a fair well to all members who are leaving, we attended a Texas Ranger Game on April 19, 1998, in celebration of a year of hard work and many more to come. Not only has the committee done its part for the community, but they have also made some life long friends. It all began with a mixer at Mountasia. This was a great way for everyone to get to know each other and have fun at the same time. The day ended with a round of miniature golf, cold drinks for everyone, and sixteen teenagers ready to make a difference for their community. The Youth Advisory Committee has been nothing but a great Success. With all the hard work we have done and all of the laughs we have shared, the committee has transformed into great memories. Not only have we made preparations for the future committees, but we have maintained a since of profile which is a prime example of how teenagers of the community should be. - INFORMAL REPORTTO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No.IR 98-137 . \ " ~ ~ 1,/~ Date: July 13, 1998 Subject: Request of North Davis Community Citizens Group for Discussion Regarding Establishment of an Overlay zone In the North Davis Boulevard Region. The North Davis Community Citizens Group made a presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission at their June 25, 1998 meeting to discuss possibilities, options, and potential for the establishment and creation of an overlay zone in the North Davis Boulevard region. The Citizens Group is interested in refining permitted land uses, enhancing landscaping regulations, confirming architectural compatibility, and tempering sign regulations to ensure that development is of high quality, contributes to the tax base, and reduces retail spending leakage that has historically occurred in the northern part of the City. The Planning and Zoning Commission responded favorably to their presentation and recommended the City Council move forward with the establishment of a committee to develop design criteria and development guidelines for the Northern Gateway Overlay Zone. The Citizens Group will be presenting a PowerPoint slide show with their ideas and concepts for the City Council to consider at the meeting. No public notice has been given since no ordinance changes are proposed at this time. . Attached are the minutes from the June 25, 1998 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Respectfully submitted, - ISSUED BYTHE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH lAND HillS, TEXAS - . 8. PZ 98-07 REQUEST OF THE NORTH DAVIS COMMUNITY CITIZENS GROUP FOR DISCUSSION REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN OVERLAY ZONE IN THE NORTH DAVIS BOULEVARD REGION APPROVED Mr. Peter Churcher thanked the Commissioners for the opportunity to speak. He informed them that they have prepared a PowerPoint presentation and have done their best to fulfill the request the Commission made in putting together ideas and discussing them with landowners in the area. Mr. Churcher stated that they would like to implement an overlay zone in the North Davis Boulevard Corridor, which extends from the City boundaries at the northeast corner of NRH and extends to Green Valley to the south and Precinct Line Road to the east. The presentation consisted of ideas in signage, landscaping, architecture, screening fences, passive parks and greenbelts and tree conservation. The presentation outlined the benefits that an overlay zone of this caliber would bring . to the City. Mr. Barfield complimented the group for their presentation, stating this was the best presentation he had seen from a citizens group. Mr. Davis commended the group for their presentation and stated he was ready to take it to the next step and asked Mr. Churcher what they anticipated happening. Mr. Churcher stated it is the group's hope that the Planning & Zoning Commission will endorse the group's idea to the City Council. Mr. Davis stated that he would like to endorse this proposal and ask the City Council to set aside staff and funds necessary to develop the design criteria and design specifications, as outüned in this proposal for a Northern Gateway Overlay Zone, made up of people that's mentioned in the proposal, Le., staff members, P&Z Commissioners, Parks Board members, design consultants, commercial stakeholders and people from the homeowners group. e Mr. Wood seconded this motion and it carried with a vote of 5 - O. Messrs. Davis, Wood, Barfield, Bowen & Nehring were in favor of this request. Page 7 - 6/25/98 P & Z Minutes - e Mr. Davis stated that he invisions this group meeting for the next 4 _ 6 months to get the design criteria, actual limits of the corridor, landscaping, architectural and signage requirements, etc. actually established. Once that "package" is complete, a public hearing would be required and the overlay zone could move forward. Mr. Davis stated that he is asking the Council to set aside funds and staff that are necessary to move forward with an establishment of a committee to develop the design criteria and development guidelines for the Northern Gateway Overlay Zone as outlined in the North Davis Citizens Groups presentation. The intent is to develop a document that will establish building/development guidelines for this part of the City. 9. STAFF COMMENTS Mr. LeBaron reminded the Commissioners of the joint work session with the City Council on Monday, June 28 at 6:00 p.m. 10. CITIZEN COMMENTS . There were none. 11. ADJOURNMENT Having no additional business to conduct, the meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Chairman David Barfield Secretary, Don Bowen e Page 8 - 6/25/98 P & Z Minutes - - · ~ e Possible Changes to Landscaping & Sign Regulations After recent discussions involving the City Council, City staff and hearing concerns expressed by a number of residents regarding landscaping, signs and other development criteria primarily on major cooridors in our city, the staff has been working on options for addressing these concerns. We realize that an Ad- Hoc Committee is being formed to review and recommend any long term changes that might be needed in these and other areas. Until the Ad-Hoc Committee can meet and formulate recommendations to the Council, we would propose that and "Interim Review Committee" of City staff be authorized to meet with any prospective developers along our corridor areas and negotiate with them for higher landscaping standards and lower profile sign sizes and heights, encouraging monument signs in many cases. In order to expedite changes when they are identified, it would be advisable to consider removing the landscaping and sign regulations from the Comprehensive Zoning Regulations and placing them in separate City Ordinances. In order to achieve this, public hearings must be held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council since we would be changing the Zoning Regulations. Notifications of the public hearings could be made concurrently to expedite this process. If the City Council desires to begin this process, staff can begin working on the replacement ordinances and the public hearing process for the two bodies. Attached are "sample" regulations that show a comparison to our current regulations. The "sample" regulations would be used to establish interim guidelines for the staff Committee to use and also as the basis for developing the ordinances that would replace the current Landscaping and Sign Regulations. Staff is seeking Council direction on proceeding with an "Interim Review Committee" to negotiate with prospective developers until more appropriate standards are in place. Staff is also seeking Council consensus to proceed with the public hearings and related notifications to consider removing from the Comprehensive Zoning Regulations and placing the Landscaping and Sign Regulations of that document into separate City Ordinances regulating these areas. If Council consensus is to proceed with these, steps will be taken to initiate both.