Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1998-08-11 Agendas - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA [ AUGUST 11,1998 - 5:30 P.M. For the Work Session and Special Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 5:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 2. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 581-5502 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. - AGENDA FOR WORK SESSION Pre-Council Room 5:30 P.M. Items for Discussion: 1. IR 98-158 Discussion of Capital Projects 2. IR 98-156 Discussion of Council Budget, Expense Planning & Scheduling of Council Travel u 3. IR 98-157 Discussion of Possible Meetings with Boards and Commissions (Zoning Board of Adjustment, etc.) 4. Adjournment to Special Council Meeting Immediately following the 5:30 p.m. Work Session, there will be a Special Council Meeting held in the Council Chambers. AGENDA FOR SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN I 1. I Call to Order - Page 2 - AGENDA FOR SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 2. GN 98-89 Record Vote on Proposed Tax Rate and Setting of Public Hearing On Proposed Tax R~te 3. GN 98-90 Setting Date for Public Hearings for 1998/99 City Budget, Parks and Recreation Development Corporation and Crime Control District Budgets 4. Adjournment e POSTED J'-1-ctP Dat~ 5)':36 (JfJt TIme Bvg;~ - . . . INFORMAL REPORTTO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No.. IR 98-158 _ ¿J1- pr¡ç- 1i V August 11, 1998 Date: Subject: 1994 Street and Drainage General Obligation (G.O.) Bond Program At budget retreat, staff identified the need for additional funding for the Street & Drainage Capital Improvements Program. We have prepared a more thorough evaluation of the remaining capital projects identified on the 1994 Bond Program in an effort to reduce costs of the projects where feasible, identify alternative funding, determine a reasonable time table to begin and complete projects, and how these projects can be financed. Let us state at the very beginning of this that m! of the projects identified in the 1994 Bond Program can be completed and within the projected taxes as explained to the voters. They can also be financed within the current tax rate. Following are the details of this evaluation and at the end are conclusions and recommendations. 1. Copy of the "Cost Estimates Approved by City Council" for the 1995-1999 CIP Street and Drainage Projects by Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc., dated July 25, 1994. (This includes Project Initiator Map.) 2. Advertising pamphlet for the 1994 Bond Election. 3. Comparison spreadsheet showing "Original 1994 Estimates" versus "Revised Estimates" for the Bond Program, dated August, 1998. 4. Attachment "A" showing a summary of the changes to the 1994 Bond Program as well as New Projects added. 5. Attachment "B" listing some of the recent revisions made by staff after detailed review of the Bond Program estimates, funding sources, and schedule. These changes have been incorporated in Items #3, #4, and #5. 6. Revised Bond Sale Schedule for 1999-2005. 7. Option 1 Proposed Future Debt Issues Schedule. 8. Option 2 Proposed Future Debt Issues Schedule. 9. Option 3 Proposed Future Debt without Hightower Drive C & D. ISSUED BYTHE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS e Item #1 gives you an accurate picture of the original budgets for each proposed project to be constructed out of the 1994 G.O. Bond Program. Item #2 is furnished to clearly show what was distributed to the public in 1994. This indicates that the improvements will cost $1.18 per month, which was based on a 2¢ tax rate increase. Item #3 shows the original cost estimates for all the projects in the program versus the current revised cost estimates to construct the projects. You will note the total difference in the two columns is an estimated $8,980,910. This is not a true representation of the additional funding needed to finish all the projects listed in Item #3. Other funding is available to reduce this figure to $5,340,000 as shown in Attachment "A", Item #4. e You will note on Attachment "A" it is separated into "New Projects Added", "TxDOT and FederallSTEA Required Cost Increases", and "Construction Cost Increases". The new projects were approved previously by Council to be a part of the City's CIP Program. The sum of these projects which were added is $4,528,186. When these new projects were approved by Council, several were to be paid from the $2,350,000 in "unspecified streets" category of the '94 Bond Election (see Attachment) and others as Rumfield were to be substituted for the Hightower C & 0 which Council and staff at that time, felt should be delayed indefinitely. Consideration was given to issuing Certificates of Obligation for the new projects but it was decided to use the '94 Bonds first and later issue C.O.'s, if needed. Section "B", "TxDOT/FederaIISTEA Required Cost Increases" also amounts to roughly $4.5 million. It represents all the increases in project budgets for all the STP-MM and CMAQ partial grant projects on Rufe Snow Drive. The increases were a result of TxDOT's more expensive pavement design criteria which calls for thicker pavement than our normal depth, the original estimate by TxDOT for the City was low, concrete cost increases due to cement shortages, TxDOT Administration Fee being added halfway into the program, and determination of necessary offsite drainage improvements needed to handle the runoff in accordance with the State design criteria. Section "C" lists the construction cost increases to the projects on the bond program. This amounts to $2,877,954. Most of the increases were due to revised cost estimates for concrete pavement versus the initial cost estimates being calculated based on a per linear foot cost figure for an asphalt section applied to the length of the proposed improvements with 30% for drainage, 10% for engineering, and 10% for contingencies. The recent cement shortage has increased the concrete costs even more. e When you add A, B, and C together you get approximately $10.5 million. After you subtract the funding sources available to cover the increase in costs, an amount of $5,340,000 remains to be funded. We show this as being funded by Certificates of Obligation. e Attachment "B" is next and shows some of the recent revisions made by staff to reduce the additional funds needed to complete the 1994 Bond Program and the New Projects previously mentioned. These revisions have been incorporated in staff's proposed program. The next item is the "Revised Bond Sale Schedule for 1999-2005", which clearly shows the amount of funding to be acquired each year by either a bond sale or purchasing Certificates of Obligation. The C. O. 's would be the funding source utilized initially with the remaining G.O. Bonds being sold starting in fiscal year 2000. Funding Options for CIP Streets and Drainage Projects As mentioned in the first paragraph, staff has evaluated the remaining projects in the '94 Bond Program and have identified several reasonable charges. These are: · Fund two additional projects with Community Development Block Grant Program ($603,000). · Modify some street projects, as Holiday Lane from Loop 820 to Industrial, and still complete in a quality manner. e · Move some projects to a time table that is more practical to complete (spreading out costs and financing impact). . Provide some projects on "pay as you go" basis using existing funds (Drainage Utility Fund balance for Channel Cleaning Projects). Staff has developed three options for consideration in completing the '94 Bond Program. Two options will allow all projects to be completed as stated in the '94 Bond Election as well as financing the additional streets and drainage projects with updated cost estimates while maintaining the current 57¢ property tax rate over the next several years. The third would give consideration to deleting the Hightower C and D projects ($1,259,300) and using the '94 Bond funds to finance projects. Option 1 would fund nearly all of the remaining project costs through debt issuance. Certificates of Obligation would be issued for $5,340,000 in 1999 to cover changes in the original 1994 plan. General Obligation Bonds (Bonds authorized by the voters) would be issued in the amount of $8.5 million over the next seven years to complete the amount voted on in 1994 and 1985. Drainage Utility Fees in the amount of $200,000 would be used to pay for miscellaneous drainage maintenance included in the plan. Option 2 is similar to Option 1 except that less debt would be issued and $520,000 of It property taxes collected would be used to pay cash for projects plus using current D.U.F. fund balance of $200,000 for a total of $720,000 for cash funded projects. This would save an estimated $500,000 in interest expense over the life of the debt issue. - . . . This option would accomplish the goal of City Council to reduce the amount of debt incurred, maintain the constant 57¢ tax rate and save interest Option 3 would be similar to Option 2 except it would totally delete Hightower C and D projects from the '94 Program and reallocate these funds to other projects, lowering the need for C.O. issuance to $3,560,000. Summary and Recommendations: Staff recommends that Option 2 be approved which will allow funding of all projects identified in the 1994 Bond Election. This will provide sale of $5,340,000 in Certificates of Obligation to finance the new street projects added (Attachment "A") and the additional costs associated with Rufe Snow Drive construction created with changes in the Federal and State requirements. This option also provides $720,000 of the '94 projects to be funded with cash from the Drainage Utility Fund balance and from additional unanticipated funds from appraised values with the 57¢ tax rate. It further allows use of CDBG funds for two additional projects. If the recommended 57¢ tax rate is approved, the increased revenues are estimated at $260,000 above that projected for the 1998-99 budget, and it is recommended that these funds be allocated for capital projects and debt service. Voters were told in 1994 that the tax rate would increase by 2¢ for the payment for the projects, equivalent to $1.18 per month on a $78,065 home. Even if the use of this "extra" revenue from the 57¢ were considered as this increase, this would be well within what the voters were advised about. In summary, we recommend Option 2, which will allow all '94 Projects to be funded. Respectfully submitted, la~~ß--/ Finance Director . . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1995 - 1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM STREET AND DRAINA GE PROJECTS COST ESTIMATES APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL JUL Y 25, 1994 Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. Consulting Engineers Page 1 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL THOROUGHFARES * 7-LANE UNDIVIDED. (P7UL AND ** 5-LANE UNDIVIDED (M5U) STREET NAME FROM TO LENGTH COST Rufe Snow (1)++ and (A)· Grapevine Hwy. Watauga Road 7,200 $2,320,000 Rufe Snow (B)++ Fair Meadows Dr. N. of North Park 2,600 750,000 Rufe Snow (C)·· High Lawn Terrace Bursey Road 1,200 467.000 See Attached Detail Cost Estimates on Page 5 for Rufe Snow, Sections (1) and (A) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF THOROUGHFARES $3,537.000 MINOR ARTERIAL STREETS. FOUR LANE UNDIVIDED. (M4Ul Holiday Lane (A) Holiday Lane (B) I.H. 820 Bogart Drive Bogart Drive Watauga Road 7,000 $1,965,000. 2,700 745.000 .' TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF M4U ARTERIALS $2,710,000 COLLECTOR STREETS. FOUR LANE UNDIVIDED. (C4U) Hightower (A) Hightower (B) Hightower (C) Hightower (D) Meadowlakes Bridge Rufe Snow Calloway Channel Smithfield Road End Exist. Hightower Meadowlakes Calloway Channel 3,400 Meadow Creek Road 1,200 Davis Blvd. 2,600 Eden Road 1,200 Industrial Park Blvd., W. 352 $819,000 298,000 682,000 585,000 485.000 $2,869,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF C4U COLLECTORS NOTE: Cost estimates include paving, storm drainage, surveying and design engineering, layout, inspection, testing, contingencies, and right-of-way. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1995 - 1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM STREET AND DRAINA GE PROJECTS COST ESTIMATES APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL JUL Y 25, 1994 . Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. Consulting Engineers Page 2 COLLECTOR STREETS. TWO-LANE UNDIVIDED. CC2U) STREET NAME FROM TO lENGTH COST Blaney Avenue Holiday lane Grapevine Highway 2,750 $580,000 Briley Drive Vance Road Blaney Ave. 1,100 160,000 Crane Road Martin Drive Amundson Drive 3,650 955,000 Green Valley Dr. Smithfield Road Davis Blvd. 2,600 641,000 Maplewood Ave. laurel lane Davis Blvd. 3,900 823,000 South Access Road Meadowlakes Dr. Rufe Snow 3,900 823,000 Susan Lee I.H. 820 Lola Drive 3,500 739,000 Tourist Drive Denton Hwy. Bewley Street 3,600 760.000 . TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF C2U COLLECTORS $5,481.000 RESIDENTIAL STREETS. TWO-LANE UNDIVIDED. CR2U) Ash Street Cloyce Court Conn Drive Grove Street Harmonson Road Jerrell Street Laura Lane Lazy Lane Lynn Terrace Maple Street Maryanna Way Nancy Lane Riviera Drive Roberta Drive Sudbury Way Wyoming Trail Lazy Lane Janetta Dr. Ashmore Lazy Lane Mackey Creek Charles Ash Ash Rogan Dr. Lazy Lane Janetta Dr. Maplewood Redondo Lola Dr. Dorchester Drive Bedford-Euless Grapevine Hwy. Maplewood Dr. Keeter Cul-de-sac Scruggs Drive Rufe Snow Colorado Grove Conn Dr. Bedford-Euless Rd. Maplewood Ave. Janetta Blaney Ave. Clenis Lane Little Ranch Road Jerrie Jo TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF R2U RESIDENTIAL STREETS . 550 750 680 600 2,000 1,325 1,500 900 1,300 400 750 750 1,900 2,100 1,900 1,600 $79,000 107,000 98,000 86,000 318,000 190,000 215,000 129,000 186,000 57,000 107,000 107,000 273,000 300,000 272,000 229.000 $2.753,000 . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1995 - 1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM STREET AND DRAINA GE PROJECTS COST ESTIMATES APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL JUL Y 25, 1994 Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. Consulting Engineers Page 3 MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION IMPROVEMENTS $300,000 UNSPECIFIED STREET IMPROVEMENTS 2.350.000 $2,650,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS TOTAL ESTIM. COST OF STREET AND SIGNALIZATION PROJECTS $20,000,000 . DRAINAGE PROJECTS CREEK NAME FROM TO LENGTH COST 1. Big Fossil Erosion Broadway Drive Exist. Cone. Liner 400 $320,000 2. Big Fossil Erosion Exist Cone. Riprap Bewley/Onyx 1,000 800,000 3. Calloway Channel (A) Windhaven Ct. Hightower Dr. 1,800 865,000 4. Calloway Channel (B) Hightower Dr. Chapman 2,400 640,000 5. Walkers Branch Channel Jerrie Jo Harwood 1,600 1,000,000 6. Little Bear Trib. LB-1 Cato Drive Little Bear Creek 500 240,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF DRAINAGE PROJECTS $3,865,000 Less unalloeated 1 985 Drainage Bond Funds (2,000.000) ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE BONDS NEEDED $1,865,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF STREET AND DRAINAGE PROJECTS $21.865.000 . . . . 5. 6. 7. 9. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1995 - 1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM STREET AND DRAINA GE PROJECTS COST ESTIMATES APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL JULY 25, 1994 Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. Consulting Engineers Page 4 PUBLIC SAFETY CAPITAL NEEDS 1. Police/Fire Property & Evidence Building $1,100,000 2. Upgrade Opticom System 300,000 3. Early Warning Siren System Upgrade 200,000 4. Fire Training Improvements 75.000 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY CAPITAL NEEDS $1,675,000 SUMMARY OF All CATEGORIES 1 . Principal Thoroughfares, 7-Lane Undivided (P7U), and 5-Lane Undiv. (M5U) $3,537,000 2. Minor Arterial Streets, Four Lane Undivided (M4U) 2,710,000 3. Collector Streets, Four Lane Undivided (C4U) 2,869,000 4. Collector Streets, Two Lane Undivided (C2U) 5,481,000 Residential Streets, Two Lane Undivided (R2U) 2,753,000 Miscellaneous Projects 2,650,000 Drainage Projects 1,865,000 Public Safety Capital Needs 1.675.000 TOTAL AMOUNT OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM $23,540,000 . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1995 - 1999 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM STREET AND DRAINA GE PROJECTS COST ESTIMATES APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL JUL Y 25, 1994 Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. Consulting Engineers Page 5 RUFE SNOW DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS GraDevine Highwav to Watauga Road COST SUMMARY FEDERAL & CITY PROJECT STATE SHARE SHARE TOTALS 1. Grapevine Highway to . Loop 820, Section (1) $ 0 $901,081 $901,081 2. Intersections from Glenview Drive to Watauga Road 2,345,275 1,339,225 3,684,500 3. Loop 820 Bridge Widening 1,874,040 841,960 2,716,000 4. Loop 820 to Watuaga Road, Section (A) 3.344.800 836.200 4.181 .000 TOTALS $7,564,115 $3,918,466 $11,482,581 AVAILABLE CITY FUNDS City Cost Requirements $3,918,466 (1 ) 1 985 Bond Election 1,498,466 (2) Funds Allocated on Dec. 13. 1993 100.000 BALANCE NEEDED $2,320.000 . '" . I007c¡pJ/cÎpini t3.map ¡q::r NO 3-007-5 3AUG94 Map Comp BRIAN J GOAD Keller .., -II- I I Jh I I· , .,.1- -; t=.!lli -ì f-- -1 - -' f{f~<{' - ~~oIt ," I. !.....~""~ I' ~1.\\ .." .//.J .. ,; ::1 ~ ---i ./ ~. -= + _ y N~ , ~ G.~ 'IAlLEV ..¡' "'0. ~~ F 0" W 0" h -i, , ,0 ~ trr= i _.... '';:=u:/~ -~, · ~z~ ~ 1 'V" ~ · .~-1 _ '¡lID:: - .:::=::::' .1'\:::= J -;'!j E - ß:~! / ~ ~".' r-:'~Øj.---. g...'<1 1- HU:m I I - :; I: 'en. ,::,I"y,-- 3-".':< - r ~ 1\ ¿r . Fie,¡ Li7\ ~ -2 -L..\', \~ ~i~~( I- ~=j ~ 11¡..ti/-¡~r- :-7 - --, I =aha. ~. == II rc: H GH ~oW-£.R .JI~, lOt . I w;:;:;;;:: ~ t; -, t1 G H ~ If D l î ~.,,,..,o" ~ ~¡ g'DD L.. ,TI,1=i L~',fi ~ \,\ =* - UHY?\ ¡~ : 4~ i~ \ ;p-¡/< ri '.~ ....... II µ i~_· .~ ~~ ~f L--- d ¡~ c,oolN·,t·1 l WhTAill",.b ....:: r±=--><~ I ~j~ .G~·o. =- YI'·,. '/1 .....- J ie-r\C~ ~_ ..- -~:~ c'mo. J '-. ,I">, -...~ _ç ... ~'o aD. r-', &r.,~" ~j -¡ «( ¡;.. ~ _ l!- II ~= ~ 00. \Yn .. - ,- ,-d - - - =~-7 JII ..·.-i\~; ..\ _.'.:,,)"~\ ,~ H a I tom C i t Y j .LL..1 ~~ _ ~:: 1::::_ ~tF=r- - B 'fL....' I Y I :::-, Z - i ::~: '0_" ~ JJF\I! ~ , , L.---J ì\ ) f¡ ~ l~' ~ " . : Q ~ ""WOOD RD. )/ : ..1 --- \ .~ f tr-;'-. ~i_~ C5,,,, r C/ , ACCESS ROAD ~ ......".. J } J ) Ìì -, ' " -, . \ ~,,,o'" --'-' -LL (-1 , ":_::;,::~~ ~ - 1:t \ l ~ ~~þ x--:.-1 f, $, \ x--t H "'J..... è ."" ~\r~'X;; ~ ~ ~ RRlLiYOO.'~ I ~ .~ j ~ i H, , . ~~. 4~~t;, æ ---i ~ ~ ; hON? J-;;: I " ~:;f:'S::: ..~. ~< ,1"'- C" 'u ,~=¿~,/.-;:; " 3 --,,' ~ R ¡ chi and H I I I s 0, 4, 57 --.i ( .£} ¡ J: ONYX ft. 5. / w Ij I [i ~.\~ I/y..·;tif'" :\\ il .t.!:.! " 7/ SCALE: 1" œ 3000' " u I ~ "F ...1. ,."" l i, L "'~ ~ ~I' IDI, !I C .. I -=, r..______ ~ u ~ g aufJS£V It . ..,,, ".1 I Keller ~ r...:" é'.:> -. /'" J.. '\-1 N1 RIC ~ . . the of Proposition 1, streets EVERY part of ~y ~ I de; r _ our cay Wlll widened and repaired. l .~ -- 1 ·d ad I I I . ~ alUap.\¡¡¡¡WI.¡V 10WWl espre ') I II /L 1." -0 = ! 1__ I worK Wlll ::: \" f- .~ 1\ !..,~_ II - <#,,ø<Y i :', r · hi .... ..,~' 1~~~i~-:ir. ~.. / ~þ J; .-~~ bl.L--~i i: ",~ )i." ~" ---II r iT- ,.__L! [__'- ,f, vf=f ~. , f-,. r ¡ "(1 T -; §=IIF7, IJ _. ,il U.J ':::h, ?/'f. 11- -Ä;\ ~ \ 3 ~¡ , f~LI I-[l_( r r :':j ì \1; ~ I f--- ~ i ,.---- 'c-r¡ NNVP:~. . ~17 I \ ,\ '-I \~ I I t,). - HI T R~ c-./ _ :1"- ~_._ ~ì [(iwAY - Ii G~~ : -L~ --"?;~"\ ~ - .~~ -(~ ~OD Î t I !#d ~.~~ ~ Jf t;;-i ïI~1 ,J ! \ (_L -L7T ìl Y J iT U , II ~ \;~:{t. l "'--- .J: r\~a--- =~ ~'_ ~.. '_..., { Lt. .tt-L~J /:%:~;,\ I - / A~ I i \./-- r-~~ ~" -¡ ::( i Þ l= l'p i""h_"_ !.., ~:J 1)1::", .'~i""'ïi\'''. --+. (;0)-:; JiLL! \ I » ~~~Tí~ L \~¿) r;\~{ 17 11= ~,íìQ I L-f ~~\ II 5-< L ~~L LL IT ;:;;- g j l ;"" zf--+ ? - \ =E --I ; ¡I II , 'i, I . f J, nil¡;, eliANNH - . '. 1 , }~~ IT! ~'~. IL ,k / !r:-~ ,-- /",/ ~ ~. 1 ~ ___LU Ii I . . · III Rufe (A) Grapevine Hwy. Watauga Road ~ Tomist Ii& Rufe Snow F air Meadows Dr. N. of North Park Ii& Ash Grapevine Highwa · Rufe Snow (C) High Lawn 1èrrace Bursey Road III Cloyce Map!ewood Drive III Holiday Lane (A) LH. 820 Bogart Drive ~ Conn Ashmore Keeter Ii& Holiday Lane (B) Bogart Drive Watauga Road IÞ Grove Street Lane Cul-de-sac Ii& Hightower (A) Rufe Snow Calloway Channel 11& Hal1l1011S0n Road Mackey Creek Scruggs Drive Ii& Hightower (B) Callowav Channel Meadow Creek Road III len'ell Street Charles Rufe Snow J 11& Hightower (C) Smithfield Road Davis Blvd. l1li Laura Lme Colorado l1li Hightower (D) End Exist. Hightower Eden Road Ijþ Lane Ash Grove l1li Meadowlakes Bridge Meadowlakes Industrial Pk Blvd Ii& Rogan Drive Conn Drive Ii& Blaney Avenue Holiday Lane Grapevine Highway III Maple Street Lane Bedford-Euless Rd l1li Brilev Drive Vance Road Blaney Ave. III Mary;:mna ]anetta Drive Maplewood Ave. J l1li Crane Road Martin Drive Amundson Drive IIÞ Lane Maplewood Janetta 411 Green Valley Dr. Smithfield Road Davis Blvd. 111\ Riviera Drive Redondo Blaney Ave. irPlewood Ave. Laurel Lane Davis Blvd. (I Roberta Way Lola Drive Clenis Lane Ith Access Road Meadowlakes Dr. Rufe Snow ( þ Sudbmv Dorchester Drive Little Ranch Rd. J III Susan Lee LH. 820 Lola Drive III Wyoming Trail Bedford-Euless Rd. Jerrie Jo . Improvements problems as maintenance center and in areas Branch. . Approval of this proposition will provide secure storage space for evidence gathered by the police in criminal cases. This is critical to proper prosecution. It upgrade the city's Opticom traffic control system, which helps emergency vehicles move through traffic faster. Also, the city will be able to upgrade its early warning siren system. . .8 . . . ORIGINAL VB REVISED CITY OF 94BS-Aug98new$ummaryonepage NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1994 GO BOND PROGRAM AUGUST 1_ PROJECT DESCRIPTION ORIGINAL.... REVISED ESTIMATE ESTIMATE DIFFERENCE STREET PROJECTS Green VaHey (Smithfield Rd. to Davis Blvd.) $641,000 $554,605 $86,395 Harmonson Rd. (Mackey Creek to Scl\lgg$ Dr.) 318,000 450,992 -132,992 I-ICIIJtt$yt.rt(A2)(~OrtoØøQartPr) 1,090,000 1.~.007 -195,1;'Q1 Holiday Ln. (B) (Bogart Dr to Mid-Cities) 745,000 600,246 144,754 Jerrel St. (Charles to Rute Snow Dr) 190,000 144,246 45,754 R~$f#:¡Wt)r(A1)~l-IWytoGlenview.()r} 450,541792.196 442.255 Hightower Dr (A1) (Rute Snow Dr to Cross Timbers) 400,000 548,155 -148,155 Ash St (Lazy Ln to Grapevine Hwy) 79,000 22,625 56,375 I..~Ln(Ash~~l'OVØr ·12$,000 41,911 S1,~ Maple St (Lazy Ln to BedfOl'd-EuIess) 57,000 20,391 36,609 Rufe Snow Dr and Glenview' Dr Intersection 500,000 664,980 -164,980 Rufj$f#:¡Wl:)r(Kâretï tøl..oOp~20) 5a7.ooo 814.450 .. .-27f,MiO Rufe Snow Dr Bridge (Across Loop 820) 2,716,000 2,716,000 0 Rufe Snow Dr (A) (Loop 820 to Mid-Citie$ Blvd) 6,828,500 10.567,330 -3,738,830 S~W.y(~rtoL1ttleR$OC") 27'2,OÇIO 300,300 +28.300 Blaney Ave (Holiday Ln to Grapevine Hwy) 580,000 701.230 -121,230 Briley Dr (Vance Rd to Blaney Ave) 160,000 205,200 -45,200 lJ\I~ng'tl'(f3EIdf~~toJ4Mort.JO) 22$.000 32....000 ..ss.oøø HightoWer Dr (A2) (Cross Timbers to Caßoway Channel) 419,000 800,000 -361,000 Hightower Dr (B) (Calloway to Meedow Creek Rd) 298,000 442,000 -144,000 CClrlrfQI'(AshrnÞrl!lto~)9S.ooo 17Ei,230 .,78;230 Cloyce ct (Janetta Dr to Maplewood Ave) 107,000 129,900 -22,900 Maplewood Ave (Laure/Ln to Davis Blvd) 823,000 720,000 103.000 CraI$Rø(M8t'ti"()rtø~Dr) 9155.000 1,130.000 -17$.000 Lynn Terrace (Rogan Dr to Conn Dr) 186,000 260,600 -74,600 Rufe Snow Dr (C) (Highlawn Terrace to Bursey Rd) 467,000 266,283 200,717 Rl.Ifé $riOWÞr(a)(If~~toNòt1hPark) 750,000 921,800 -17'1,800 Maryanna Way (Janetta Dr to MapIewóod Ave) 107.000 135,400 -28,400 Nancy Ln (Janetta Dr to Maplewood Ave) 107,000 135,280 -28,280 ~$t«(azyl..rltôQ41.-D~) 86.000 1~.2$O.,9't~ Laura In (Ash to Colorado) 215,000 300.000 -85.000 RMera Dr (Redondo to Blaney Ave) 273,000 300,000 -27,000 Rl.IffJsnow[)r(113)(GlØnvi~tóKåreø} 450,540 1.3OO,()QO --649.4ØØ Tourist Dr (Denton Hwy to Bewley) 780,000 728,780 31,220 Holiday Ln (A 1) (loop 820 to Lewis Dr) 875,000 600,000 275,000 M~~$idg.(~f..QOp82()}4S5.OOO485,OOOQ RObemI Dr (Lola Dr to Clenis) 300,000 410,000 -110,000 Loop 820 S.Aocess Rd (MeadowIakes to Rufe Snow Dr) 823,000 645,510 177,490 $µsattI..ØLo(i..øop$2()J:o toiaQr) 739,000 673.0Q0··· ea,()()(). Hightower Dr (C) (Smithfield Rd to Davis Blvd) 682,000 720,250 -38,250 Hightower Dr (D) (End of Exist Hightower to Eden Rd) 585000 539,050 45,950 :_11I.JJmtt..i.il~'.jfiitlU¡¡__ $17,350,000 $23,595,122 DRAINAGE PROJECTS Calloway Channel (A) (Windhaven ct to Hightower Dr) $885,000 $700,000 165,000 Ca1iowayChannel(B)(HIghtower Drto Chapman Rd) 640,000 1,400,000 -760,000 wøF'~~Øtt(~y1íO~omx) 1,12O.0ø0 900;000 9lO,OO() Walker Branch Channel (Jerri Jo to Harwood Rd) 1,000,000 900.000 100,000 little Bear Creek L13-1 (Cato Dr to little Bear Creek) 240,000 240,000 0 .1:_._".«tBi._..t~1iI_~I_ $1,865,000 $2,140,000 PUBUC SAFETY PROJECTS Public Safety Building Upgrade Opticom System Early Warning Siren System Upgrade FIre Training Improvements MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS Traffic Signal Improvements $300,000 $72.702 UNSPECIRED STREET IMPROVEMENTS Browning Dr I Industrial Park Blvd Intersection Amundson Dr (Cardinalln to Mid-Cities Blvd) Additional Unspecified Streets (Unidentified) NEW PROJECTS Douglas Ln (Bursey Rd to Starnes Rd) R~RdPh~se I(Prec:inctLineRdtX) Spring Oak Dr) RØm1iêldR(t~JH$prtrtgOåkPtto~ Rd) . Rumfield Rd Phase III (Eden Rd to Davis Blvd) Miscellaneous Channet Cleaning $0 o o o o $1,550,000 655,500 65§.«IO 969,000 200,000 -$1,550,000 -655,500 .~,«JO -969,000 -200.000 TOTAL (1884 CIP Program) $34.702,561 $43,683,491 -$8,980,910 TOTAL (188& Bond FUnds & ISTEA Grant available for 1984 CIP) $11 162,581 ~ 1IIIi....II__1IBIIr_ . . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 1994 G. O. Bond Program ATTACHMENT "A" Changes to the Bond Program 8/6/98 Street & Drainage Projects: $21,865,000.00 A. New Projects Added to Program: 1. Douglas Lane * 2. Rumfield Road, Phase I 3. Rumfield Road, Phase" 4. Rumfield Road, Phase III * 5. Browning Dr/Industrial Park Blvd Intersection * 6. Amundson Drive (Cardinal to Mid-Cities) 7. Miscellaneous Channel Cleaning Subtotal of New Projects = $1,550,000.00 $655,500.00 $656,400.00 $969,000.00 $297,692.00 $199,594.00 $200.000.00 $4,528,186.00 B. TxDot and FederallSTEA Required Cost Increases: 1. Rufe Snow Drive (All STP-MM & CMAQ) > Minus 1985 GO Bond Project Savings Subtotal of TxDot ISTEA Increases = $4,581,939.00 $1.498.466.00 $3,083,473.00 C. Construction Cost Increases: 1. Rufe Snow Drive (Glenview to Karen) 2. Rufe Snow Drive (Fair Meadows to North Park) * 3. Hightower Drive (Rufe Snow to Cross Timbers) 4. Hightower Drive (Cross Timbers to Meadow Ck) * 5. Holiday Lane (Lewis to Bogart) * 6. Harmonson Road (Mackey Ck to Scruggs) 7. Blaney Avenue (Holiday to Grapevine Hwy) 8. Crane Road (Martin to Amundson) 9. Hightower Drive (Smithfield to Davis) 10. All Other Streets Subtotal of Construction Cost Increases = $849,460.00 $171,800.00 $148,155.00 $325,000.00 $195,907.00 $132,992.00 $121,230.00 $175,000.00 $38,250.00 $720.160.00 $2,877,954.00 $10.489.613.00 TOTAL OF A. + B. + C. = > Minus "Unspecified Street '94 Bonds" > Minus CDBG Funding Allocation > Minus 1985 GO Bond Project Savings > Minus Drainage Utility Fee Funds $2,350,000.00 $1,890,410.00 $709,203.00 $200.000.00 $5,340,000.00 Additional Certificates of Obiligation Funds * Denotes completed projects c:lmydocumentslattachment a-changes in 94 bond program-r1 . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 1994 G. O. Bond Program ATTACHMENT "B" Proposed Changes to Street /Drainage CIP 1. Utilize 100% CDBG Funding for: ~ Roberta Drive ($ 170,000) ~ S!,Jsan Lee Lane ($ 433.000) Subtotal reduction in '94 GO Bonds ($ 603,000) 2. Revise Construction Limits for Holiday Lane (Loop 820 to Dick Lewis) to reflect one lane reconstruction and 2 foot widening. ($ 275,000) 3. Fund Miscellaneous Channel Cleaning Project with current Drainage Utility Fund (DUF) ($ 200,000) . 4. Reduction in Original Cost Estimate for: ~ Calloway Branch Channel, Section "A" ($ 165,000) "- Big Fossil Erosion Control ($ 220,000) ,. );. Walker Branch Channel (Jerri Jo to Harwood) ($ 100.000) TOTAL PROPOSED REDUCTIONS = ($1,563,000) . 815198 Q) :; '0 Q) .! Q) VI 'S; Q) .... co 0> C :;, <¡: en 0) 'It 0> (f)~ ~~ %c) 00 co u.ZO:ca :5~:! .....01- o6oZ! _00" oiiCl);:) %O-C tic) 0;1 Zœ ..... I It) o Q N ooö' t() t() O. N 0 (')" 0- ai 0)": N Mil>' ,.... 1l>C'\I: ...:. (,9.; ..,. o o N 88 00 0" t()- g~ o ..... t() t()- 'It co M 8 N o 8 ~" co 8 N o o 0" o t() co .- o o N o o o. t() ,.... co Q 8 N OOCOO 8ococo 0.....,.... g- o' -<q"" co- Ot()N (")(")("),.... g œ .- OOt()og'ltOt() 1t)0( )t() --Ot() NOt()(")M(")It)CO (")- c;j (")" ,.: '¢- ~- ,....- co' (0(")(0(")0>(\1(")(") ~ (")'¢ <0 t.9 - (") Z o ~ it: o (f) w o .... o w '"' o a:: ~ ;~ 1;,;" ~ ~ f f~ .... ~ ~w~ ro ~ 2 ; Jo~ ~ ~ m ~ m-~ -. ..c .t::. - ø U) Gi ~t:~ Q)~ u 0 ~ ~ _ 0 _~~. ~ ~ íiì æ ~ ~ 1'0 ¡ g ~ :; iG 0 ¥fr:! 'Oo!o:~~~ ~O ~~~co ~~O~~ i8iQIJ~~ J~i~~lf I~~l~ CZ Ij5 ~ ~ ~:; j f ~ 1 § ~ š -;: ~ i :g ~ ~ ~~:: 9~ S~j~~ô~'OOE~Oëj~S~w;.:I·.·i~_... :; 0 ~"a1~;ia1~"<j~:i.U~~.r;~; U - .!:: co ~ a I 0: 0 .9 - ~ .9 In Q. ~ 0 '0 (0 ~E '0' " f/)o....1'O ..c:4õi'O _0=£ ....811-0::: C. Jo,;..O!:!:,.Q.U"C 0 >00'0 Q) is::::: 01.... ~ Q.enw; . ~ C ~ ~ 8 õ 0: i Q) () c III 8 0) ..J '0 0 ~ Q ~ ~ .; ~ ..J Q) ~ ¿ e. tj 0) ~ .9 .g 1!! :E ::.;:: ð5 ~ 8 ¿ ~ ã..1·...: o~æ~....>oc~Q).r;Q)~ œ....<~..J<c ~~'"' OOI'OI'O~~~~,o ~O~Q)-...JiSiS* ~¿~~~~~ 5-~~~~~C~iSen&........~ ~m5~c~5~~5°~2~c~~I'O~~~~i:i Q)>OO)(/);:' E~ ro¡¡::IIIQ)O)m6~coc55: > U & Q) ~ t' 0 01 e.~ E "C c & :2 '0 ~ Q. m :ë E' , oC_~'O=>o~~> ;:'m--æ 8U1Q~! .... IU :;, ::J ::J "" :> 0 ._:;, 0 ....:;,0 0 ~ ._ ._ ~':Sl CI) c) z a::: ~ (J) Q) > 0 ~ ~ .... u a::: ::r: ~ 0: ..J en ::r: ::r:~i ~: ...... 0". ~. t "",~-' ·t. \ (~"~ ~; 11). ~ ;r.:; ~ ,:;¡ J co ~i ;;.~ ·~4 g: ~¡ '::'~ ~~ I,(f: "'"1 ..,.. lif, ; ~ *; ~ CD: CD..: -; '" .~ OOO§· .. 800 . It) t() ; ,..... N- IÓ Itf ~~~a; "f-~ 0i :~~ 88 00 ~. g' M(,,) fl ~; :jll >:;<':: ;",::; ~ t#J; ~1~ I·'," ..-.. "l.;:.a " .... t¡'"4 ~o::: utf:j ~" .... 0-J c ~ Æ "'1 o ,g, - ..r,,:¡:¡ ~cu.!!~ ~ J: t1 ~s.. '. ¡¡¡ 0:"" y"i'¥ Q) .. 0 '$1! SO:: rl'~;~ 1>0 ~ ~ :.-:.' \. '"' ãí, : -u~ ~ Qj -'. ' ~a12'";"O, ~~mQ)I·¡ '""i c.r;..Jt o Qo~i' : a:: . 1 ;;.:, ~ Ë ~ ....,li'.. tu w c U:a,: '" _ e ....¡ 'J '- ... CO '_I' ~ ~ ~ Q)." !i!: ~ ~ 0), ' ;qu.::!!; &.' . "" C 1'0 i3' ; ë5 ä5 ;: ::J }~; c: ..,., i1 ~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ I ~~ ß~ ~ 0 :gj t.9 .~ ,~¡ t;...:>:~ r?~l ~{~ 8) ~ .0.-' I~ t;~ 1.1;:;; ~i '§; ~ ~ .~ t:~.:!1 tf~a ~ti~ 'tÖi ð: "¡.. .~ ;:;d if ~ .- 0- ".~ .~... ~3 f" .:~ ~~ ~ ~ij ~t~ ~ ~ ~!1 'Q,:i I t ~i ~ ö! -g :øl 0 ~: CD ~ q '. c) ~j Fi :3 ,., ; -;<"':" ..~'1 o· fill): 3~f L~ ~~\t :~ 8' ~, t~i ~~Þl ;f.ª ~ ;&~ :;~1 .;~ ~,r ~l . o~ :;i ~'~~ ò- ~' ØÍ, 10: ~ ..... w. '. , 0: -, I(.t' ~] .....;: 411:. ....10 ~::~ , ~ ~~~f; --.:.1:0:: ~ 0": 0. ~: ;',-,;: §: !Q: CO·' 8 o co" ... It) ~ , ;;¥.f Ii ~., -. C"f ("). . .,." ,.. . ~, ..... Ö r--' ~: Iñ lit' .' ,..' ~:J ~~ ï<;..~1., .~~ iffi ,,'." ~ I ~::; ~',.:: ~ ~ ~fi ~~ I B; rt,., 'íI: rl","t¡; ,0' .t et:. .0; ..~'. ~15-: ....; ( ) x . ..- e: .Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... Q. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 1.0 ex> 1.0 0 1.0 e: ( ) ('t) <0 ..- ..- "o;t 1.0 ro ro ('t) <0 1.0 1.0 ('t) ex> a.. ..... CD ..- ex> 1.0 ('t) ..... 0 ..- .c I- a> 0 a> L- a 0 0 0> :J ..... 0 0 0 e: :J 1.0 0 0 0 'L: U. 0 0 ci 0 ro 0 a> '" <0 <0 <0 '" '" '" ü ..- ..- ..- a> e: 0 0 0 e: 0 0 0 ro "o;t 0 0 0 .r: ( ) 0 0 0- 0 ü 0 e: '" ('t) ('t) ('t) u 0 I"'- I"'- I"'- ( ) :e ..- ..- ..- ~ "'C "'C L- « 0 0 0 .E "'C ('t) 0 0 0 ( ) 0 0 0 u. ( ) a> e: 0 ci :::> :J ro 0 0 0 0 I ( ) ( ) '" 1.0 1.0 1.0 ( ) ..... CD <0 <0 E "'C U ..... a> 0 e: .c 'õ' L- . ~ a> 0 0 0 - L- a 0 0 0 .r: 0 a.. ..- '" .~ 0 0 0 0 0 a> e: e: 0 0 ci 0 0 a:: L- .Q 0 :J '" 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 .r: ..... ..... ~ <0 <0 <0 0 :J U Q. t a> 0 '" 0 u. w ( ) Z "'C 0 0 0 a> - a> "'C ..- 0 0 0 "'C o ( ) e: 0 0 0 0 :J >.00 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 U .-:: Q.CD '" I"'- I"'- I"'- e: 0 Ü L-I.O ex> ex> ex> a.. ex> 0 (» <.9 ..- 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 :J oð 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "o;t 0 I"'- LÔ ex> 0- 0 0 >- 0 I (» '" <0 ..- ..- 0 '" '" ( ) (» ..- 0 1.0 I"'- 1.0 '" « ..- - , ..- ..- '" ('t) >. ro 0 0 0 0 0 0 a.. 0 0 0 0 0 (» (» 0 0 0 0 0 (» (» 0 0- 0 0 0 (» (» ..- ..- 1.0 1.0 '" I"'- 0 CD <0 ex> "o;t '" a> "o;t 1.0 .r: I- ....... ....... ~ 1.0 ( ) ....... (» ex> "o;t '-'" '-'" "'C 0 ~ (» a> a> e: <.9 a> '-'" 0 ..... a.. ( ) 0> 0> CD ( ) I 0 a> ..... ro ro ..... :J Z ('t) a> e: e: a> ..... 0 0 Q. a> 0 a> .c >- . >. L- ro ro L- a> I "o;t L- L- I- ..... 0 0 <.9 ..... 0 ( ) en en a> « ex> ro ro I (» :J 0 0 0 ..... 0 ..... >. - ( ) 0 0 ro ~ ( ) <.9 <.9 <.9 I- Ü I- a.. ex> C/) x . "I C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 a a a a a. a a a a a a 0 "I 1.0 ex> 1.0 a 1.0 c .!!J. ('t) <.0 T""" T""" "I ('t) ('t) <.0 1.0 1.0 ex> ('t) .s!! co <.0 ex> "¢ ('t) a.. - T""" 0 T""" - I- ..c Q) 0 0 a a ~ :J a a a - 1.0 a a a :J a 0- a a LL a "I <.0 <.0 <.0 "I "I "I 0> T""" T""" T""" C 'C co a a a Q) "¢ 0 a a Ü a a a a 0 a a- ID C/) C/) a c "I ('t) ('t) ('t) c Q) 0 ,..... ,..... ,..... C :J - T""" T""" T""" co C i; .!: Q) Ü > '0 a a a Q) « a a a u ..... '0 ('t) 0 a a C/) x C/) c a ~ co C/) Q) a a a a - :J co "I 1.0 1.0 1.0 ..... >. I C/) C/) <.0 <.0 <.0 0 t C/) - - Q) U '0 - Q) LL a. c ..c 'õ' 0 a a :J 0 co ..... . Q) ..... "I a a a 0 a. .!: 0 a.. "I a a a .~ a 0- E E Q) c c a 0 a 0:: ..... 0 0 "I 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 C/) 0 :J <.0 <.0 <.0 ..... .:: :z::; - - Q) .!: - U a. t :J a :J a 0 LL ~ 0 0 c 0 Z '0 W a a a 0 Q) a a a a > - Q)'O T""" a 0 a a Q) 0 o C/) c a 0 ..... <.0 >.00 a 1.0 1.0 1.0 "I X "I - a.£D "I ,..... ,..... ,..... C/) co C/) .- 0 ex> <X) <X) ü.....1.O Q) - Q) a.. <X) '0 >. '0 :J t :J m a a a 0 a a 0 Q) U T""" a a a a a a c a. c oð a 0 a a a a a 0 a ci 0 ..... 0 "¢ ,..... 1.0 ex> 0 0 a. m a <.0 T""" T""" 0 a <.0 0> 0> m "I T""" a 1.0 ,..... ,..... "I :J E :J T""" - o 0 0 T""" T""" "I "I >.':: >. C/)a C/) a a a a a a a coa co a a a a a >. a_ >. m a a a a a coa co m a a a ci a 0..<.0 a.. m mN T""" 1.0 1.0 "I ,..... <.0 0 <.0 <.0 <X) "¢ "¢ m'O a "¢ 1.0 m c a T""" co "I --.. --.. "¢ 1.0 C/) --.. m <X) "¢ '-' '-' '0 0 ~ m Q) Q) c (!) Q) '-' 0> 0> 0 Õ a.. C/) £D C/) I - co co - :J Z 1.0 Q) Q) c .£ Q) - 0 0 a. Q) co co 0 Q) ..c >- . >. ..... ..... Q) "¢ - ..... ..... , I- 0 0 (!) - 0 C/) en en Q) « <X) co co I m :J 0 0 0 õ 0 - >. - C/) 0 co Sf? C/) (!) (!) (!) l- t) I- a.. <X) . . . (/) c o ; U '0 « (/)'0 _(/) 0> C ::J ctI I(/)(/) (/)õ '0....0> æ ~'ê' ..cOo.. .2 0> C a::: 3.Q ..c3õ Bu..o> z'Ow Q)'O (/) C o 0 g-CD L-L{) o..ro (» ..- - o >. .... (3 oð ~ (» (» ..- ('i) o o C\I ('i) C o ; a. o C\I o o C\I ..- o o C\I o o o C\I (» (» (» ..- !:!!. ctI .... o I-- L{) o o C\I ~ o o C\I ~ (» ....... 0> a. >. I-- 0> ::J (/) (/) (/) ã) ~ èñ o (9 o o o C\I ('i) ('i) CD o o o o o ('i) " ..- o o o 0- L{) CD o o o o L{) CD o o o L{) " ro o o o " CD ..- ..- o o o o CD C\I ..- o o o L{) CD CD ..- o o o L{) ..- o ..- o o o o L{) CD ~ (» ....... 0> 0) ctI C 'm L- o o (9 o o o ro ..- L{) o o o o L{) CD o o o o L{) CD o o o L{) " ro o o o ro ..- L{) o o o o o " C\I o o o o o ..- (» ..- lÕ ro ....... 0> 0) ctI C 'm L- o o (9 (/) '0 C o CD o (9 (ij Õ I-- o o o L{) ..- L{) ro o o o o o ('i) " ..- (/) ã) 0> L- .... en o o o o o 0- CD L{) ('i) o o o 6 CD L{) ('i) :ë 0> o (ij Õ I-- o o o L{) " o C\I ..- o o o o o ('i) " ..- o o o o L{) CD o o o o L{) CD o o o L{) " ro o o o o o " C\I o o o o CD C\I o o o o " ~- L{) o o o o CD ~ o (9 I ::J o >- , (/) 4= >. ctI a.. 0) C 'C ctI 0> o ã) C C ctI ..c o u .~ ~ L- .E u.. ::::> o E e (/) - 0> o ::J o C 00> o > o ~ C\I x (/).£9 0> >. -gt uO> a. C 0 o L- 0) a. ::J E o e >.- (/)0 ctlO >.0 ctI 0- a.. CD (»C\I (»'O (» C ..- ctI Qj Õ z (/) 0> ::J C 0> > ~ X ctI .... >. t 0> a. e a. E e - o o o 0- CD C\I (/) 0> '0 ::J U C o 0) ::J o >. (/) ctI >. ctI a.. o o o C\I (» L{)(» o(» 0"- C\I .£ .£ '0 o ~ oð(/) (/) 0::: L-.Q Q) Q) ~O o .EO 0) . .- 0 IQ) L- U .E::J 0)'0 C ~ uO C.... ::J (/) - '0 (/) C 0> ::J .... - ctI (/) .£ 0> EëU U W 0 ('i)ctI C ~ 2'0 a.c octl (/) x ('i) c o ; a. o c ctI a.. .... .Q 0> o ~ ::J .... ::J u.. ~ a.. ro o ~ ro 0) ...... ~ ro - e e - INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL + No. IR 98-156 Date: August 11, 1998 Subject: Council Budget, Expense Planning and SchedulinQ of COU~cil Travel Mayor Scoma requested, in follow-up to the recent Budget Retreat, that this item be placed on a work session agenda to allow Council an opportunity to discuss travel policies, participation in organizations and conferences and other items related to the Council activities and Budget. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ham City Manager LJC/ld ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL N IR 98-157 o. e * V Date: August 11, 1998 I- ~ Subject: Discussion of Possible Meeting with Boards and Commissions (Zoning Board of Adjustment, etc.) Mayor Scoma requested that this item be placed on the Council work session for the purpose of discussing a possible meeting with the Zoning Board of Adjustment and potentially other Boards and Commissions to create a better understanding and direction from Council to these Boards and Commissions. Before any meetings are held with the Zoning Board of Adjustment or others, Mayor Scoma wanted to discuss with council members your ideas and directions for such groups prior to holding any meetings with them. The purpose of this agenda items would be to discuss with Council your thoughts and ideas about possibly having meetings and the types of items to be discussed with Boards or Commissions. Respectfully submitted, ~j}-Ú~ ~~ .J~ ¿~nningh~ City Manager e LJC/ld - ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA} AUGUST 11,1998 - 5:30 P~. I For the Work Session and Special Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 5:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 2. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 581-5502 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. e AGENDA FOR WORK SESSION Pre-Council Room 5:30 P.M. Items for Discussion: 1. IR 98-158 Discussion of Capital Projects 2. IR 98-156 Discussion of Council Budget, Expense Planning & Scheduling of Council Travel 3. IR 98-157 Discussion of Possible Meetings with Boards and Commissions (Zoning Board of Adjustment, etc.) 4. Adjournment to Special Council Meeting Immediately following the 5:30 p.m. Work Session, there will be a Special Council Meeting held in the Council Chambers. AGENDA FOR SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ""'= NUMBER ITEM ACTION 'TAKEN 1. Call to Order e e -- e Page 2 r I AGENDA FOR SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 2. GN 98-89 Record Vote on Proposed Tax Rate and Setting of Public Hearing On Proposed Tax Rate 3. GN 98-90 Setting Date for Public Hearings for 1998/99 City Budget, Parks and Recreation Development Corporation and Crime Control District Budgets 4. Adjournment CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 8/11/98 Subject: Record Vote on Proposed Tax Rate and Setting of Public Hearing Agenda Number: GN 98-89 In follow-up to the 1998/99 Budget Work Session, it is necessary to begin the notice and hearing procedures to establish a tax rate and approve the budget for the next fiscal year in accordance to the City's Charter and State law. The Council's consensus was to set the tax rate for next fiscal year at 57¢, which is the same tax rate as the current year. The 57¢ tax rate would be divided as follows: Debt Service Maintenance and Operations 25.4916¢ 31.5084¢ 57.0000¢ At the time of the Budget Retreat, Tarrant Appraisal District had just released the certified appraisal figures, and staff had not had time to evaluate these except to know that the overall new construction and values had increased. After evaluating the Tarrant Appraisal information, the 57¢ will produce $260,000 more than anticipated. Staff suggests that this $260,000 be designated for capital projects. As was mentioned in the discussion on the capital projects budget, in the 1994 bond election, voters were informed that a tax rate increase of 2¢ would be required to finance these bonds, and a tax rate increase has not occurred in the last six years. Therefore, we suggest using this $260,000 for capital projects. Effective January 1, 1998, Senate Bill 841, passed by the 75th Legislature, amended Section 26.05 (d) to require a taxing unit to hold a public hearing to impose an amount of property taxes that exceeds the preceding year's property taxes. Previous to this, a taxing entity was allowed to increase up to three percent without holding a public hearing. The State notice requirements regarding the tax rate calculations are somewhat misleading to the public, but nevertheless, we must comply with them. If a business or residence has no increase in its appraisal value, the 57¢ rate means no change in taxes. Some properties decreased in value, therefore, taxes will decrease. Some increased and their taxes will increase. New construction also added to the property tax base and the notice provisions do not speak to this. The average homestead increased from $86,195 to $89,246, and using this as required by law in the notice, the average homestead would increase by 3.54% or $14.78 annually in taxes. Finance Review ~rt~ature CITY COUNCIL ACTION Fin.",," Direct"; Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Page 1 of 2 State law further requires a record vote be taken by Council concerning the proposed tax rate and that Council schedule a public hearing on the proposed rate. The results of the vote will then be published in the "Fort Worth Star Telegram" as a quarter page "Notice of Public Hearing on Tax Increase." A copy of the notice accompanies this cover sheet. Because of strict timing requirements that are also mandated by state law it is recommended to Council that the notice be published on Friday, August 14 and the public hearing be scheduled for the next regular meeting of Monday, August 24. Staff proposes to publish an accompanying explanation of the notice. This explanation would appear on the same page as the notice (not as part of the notice) and would explain that the tax rate has not increased in six years, and that the 1994 bond program will be completed without a tax rate increase even though a two cent rate increase was projected at the time of the election. A version of a possible explanation is attached. Formal adoption of budget ordinance and tax rate ordinance for next year will be done at the September 14 Council meeting after the August 24 public hearing. Recommendation: That a record vote be taken concerning the proposed tax rate of 57 ¢ and set a public hearing on the tax rate at 7:30 p.m. August 24, 1998. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS e e e Explanation of Notice Below The City of North Rich/and Hills is proposing a 57¢ tax rate for the coming fiscal year. The City has maintained this same 57¢ tax rate for six consecutive years. The City has made significant progress in completing the $23.5 million street, drainage and public safety bond program approved by voters in 1994. At the time of the election, it was estimated that a tax rate increase of 2¢ would be needed to complete the bond program. The City plans to complete the bond program without raising the tax rate. The Notice below is required by the State of Texas to be published regarding the tax rate and pröperty taxes because of increases in overall taxable values as of January 1, 1998. The City Council and management of the City of North Richland Hills are proud of the progress we have made while demonstrating sound financial management of our Citizens' tax dollars. e e e Notice of Public Hearing on Tax Increase The City of North Richland Hills will hold a public hearing on a proposal to increase total tax revenues from properties on the tax roll by 6.71 percent. Your individual taxes may increase or decrease, depending on the change in the taxable value of your property in relation to the change in taxable value of all other property and the tax rate that is adopted. The public hearing will be held on August 24, 1998 at 7:30 PM at 7301 NE Loop 820, City Council Chambers, City of North Richland Hills, Texas~ FOR the proposal: AGAINST the proposal: PRESENT and not voting: ABSENT: The following table compares taxes on an average home in this taxing unit last year to taxes proposed on the average home this year. Again, your individual taxes may be higher or lower, depending on the taxable value of your property. Last Year Average residence homestead value $86,195 General exemptions available $12,929 (amount available on the average homestead. not including senior citizen's or disabled person's exemptions) This Year $89,246 $13,387 A verage taxable value Tax rate Tax $73,266 0.570000 $417.62 $75,859 0.570000 $432.40 Under this proposal, taxes on the average homestead would increase by $14.78 or 3.54 percent compared with last year's taxes. Comparing tax rates without adjusting for changes in property value, the tax rate would increase by $0.00 per $100 of taxable value or 0.00 percent compared to last year's tax rate. These tax rate figures are not adjusted for changes in the taxable value of property. e e e Notice of Vote on Tax Rate The City of North Richland Hills conducted a public hearing on a proposal to increase the total tax revenues of the City of North Richland Hills by 6.71 % percent on Monday, August 24, 1998, 7:30 pm. The City of North Richland Hills is scheduled to vote on the tax rate that will result in that tax increase at a public meeting to be held on Monday, September 14, 1998, at 7:30 PM at 7301 NE Loop 820, City Council Chambers, City of North Richland Hills, Texas. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 8/11/98 Subject: Setting Date for Public Hearings for 1998/99 City Budget, Agenda Number: GN 98-90 Parks and Recreation Development Corporation and Crime Control District Budgets It is necessary for City Council to set public hearings on the proposed 1998/99 City Budget, proposed projects and operations of the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation, and the Crime Control and Prevention District Budget. A published notice will be required for each public hearing as per the City Charter and State law. The exact wording for each notice accompanies this cover sheet. Each hearing is set for August 24, 1998 beginning at 6:45 p.m. for the Crime Control and Prevention District, 7:00 p.m. for the Park Corporation, and 7:30 p.m. for the City Budget. Recommendation: To set the date for the public hearings on the Crime Control District and Prevention District Budget at 6:45 p.m., the Park Development Budget at 7:00 p.m., and the annual City budget at 7:30 p.m. on August 24, 1998. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GOlRev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~I ~~~ Df/partment Head Signature ( L CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance" Direct"; Page 1 of e e e NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON 1998/99 PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing is to be held by the Board of Directors of the North Richland Hills Crime Control and Prevention District on the 1998-99 proposed annual budget during a meeting to be held at 6:45 p.m. on August 24, 1998 at the North Richland Hills City Hall City Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas. The proposed budget is available for review in the office of the City Secretary at City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. e e e NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROJECTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing is to be held by the Board of Directors of the North Richland Hills Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation during a meeting to be held at 7:00 p.m. on August 24, 1998 at the North Richland Hills City Hall City Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas, on the Corporation funding and undertaking projects involving improvements and renovations to neighborhood and community parks (including, but not limited to, the construction of baseball and softbalr fields, neighborhood parks, building of hike and bike trails, the operations of the tennis center and the expenditure of funds to pay operating costs of City owned projects undertaken by the Corporation.) A more detailed description of the projects to be undertaken by the Corporation covered by this notice is available for review in the office of the City Secretary at City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. - e - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 1998/99 PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to all interested citizens in the City of North Richland Hills, that the City Council will hold a public hearing on the 1998-99 proposed annual budget on Monday, Al!gust 24, 1998 during the regular City Council meeting at 7301 N.E. Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas, beginning at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. The proposed budget is available for review in the office of the City Secretary at City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.