Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1998-09-14 Agendas ·. '"....~~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCILAGENDA SEPTEMBER 14, 1998 - 6:20 P.M. Fadhe;M~tin9conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Pre-Council Chambers, 7301 'NortheastLoòp 820. , -- NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN. . 1. Discuss Items from Regular September 14 Agenda (5 Minutes) 2. .IR 98-182 Review Funding Issues Related to NETS (10 Minutes) 3.; IR98-184 Discuss Agenda for Meetings with Planning & Zoning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment (15 Minutes) 4. IR 98-185 Set Schedule for Future Meetings of Boards and Commissions (5 Minutes) 5. IR98-183 Discuss Council Travel Policy and Conferences (10 Minutes) , 6. Other Informational Items (5 Minutes) 7. *Executive Session (10 Minutes) - The Council may enter into closed èxecutive session to .,"' ,.. ". ".'-': :-" -..-- discuss the following: POSTED A. Pending Litigation Under Government Code 9-/rq;r §551.071 Date Seaton vs. NRH q-óP J} /h -_. .... Time I 8. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. //1) 5 ¡hI Secretary J ¡3>~. )( _V/J f *Closèðdue to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law.· If-any action is contemplated, itwin betaken in open session. .~ . '. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 14,1998 -7:30 P.M. For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items on the consent agenda will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 581-5502 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance - . .. . , ',,'.., .,' -' , ':4,. ,.... , Speciafpresent~tiÓi,s:: a.- Rect>gnition of Former:. Board/Commission Members , , 'IRg:g~;Uf1 b. ' Oistihguisheéf'B.ucjget-Presentation Award for Fiscal Year 1997/98 . , · NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 5. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 6. Approval of Consent Agenda Item(s) a. Minutes of the Goal Setting Work Session June 19-20, 1998 b. Minutes of the Work Session June 30, 1998 c. Minutes of the Special Meeting August 11, 1998 d. Minutes of the Pre-Council Meeting August 24, 1998 e. Minutes of the Regular Meeting August 24, 1998 GN 98-98 f. Appointment of Assistant City Secretary - Resolution No. 98-41 GN 98-99 g. Appointment to Place 4 on Teen Court Advisory Board GN 98-105 h. Interlocal Agreement on Juveniles with Tarrant County - Resolution No. 98-38 GN 98-107 i. Approve Exemption of City's Health Plan from HIPAA Requirements GN 98-110 j, Amend Interlocal Agreement for Use of Environmental Collection Center - Resolution No. 98-45 GN 98-111 k. Revision of School Zone Hours at Carrie Francis Thomas Elementary School - Ordinance No. 2326 GN 98-112 I. Contract Authorizing Pass-Through State Grant Agreement for NETS PU 98-55 m. Approval of Purchase of Armored Vehicle Page 2 '. ,e . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7. PZ 98-32 Public Hearing to Consider the Appeal of Nextel Corporation for a Special Use Permit to Allow a Communications Tower on a Portion of Lot 15A, Edgley Addition (Located in the 7500 Block of Grapevine Highway) - Ordinance No. 2230 8. PZ 98-35 Request of Jim Brown for a Reduction of the Masonry Requirement on Lot 14, Block 3, J.L. Autrey Addition (Located at 4019 Rufe Snow Drive) - Resolution No. 98-44 9. PZ 98-36 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of the City of North Richland Hills to Remove the Special Use Permit Allowing Nursery Retail Sales, Truck Rental, and a Temporary Office (Located at 5102 Davis Boulevard) - Ordinance No. 2332 10. PS 98-30 Request of Rob Adams for a Final Plat of Lots 1 Rand 2, Block 6, Tapp Addition (Located at 6401 Northeast Loop 820) 11. PS 98-34 Request of John Barfield for a Replat of Lot 1, Block 1, and Lot 16, Block 2, Thornbridge Estates, Phase 5 (Located at 8933 and 9001 Thornway Drive) 12. PS 98-35 Request of Matt Speight for a Replat to be known as Lots 1 R 1 and 1 R2, Block 30 Holiday North Addition, Section 8 (Located in the 5500 Block of Davis Boulevard) 13. PS 98-41 Request of Michael Rader for an Amended Plat of Lots 6 & 7, Block 4, Industrial Park Addition (Located at 5619 Rufe Snow Drive) Page 3 . e . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 14. GN 98-100 Approval of 1998 Certified Tax Roll - Resolution No. 98-40 15. GN 98-101 Authorizing Homestead, Over 65, and Disability Exemptions from Ad Valorem Taxes - Ordinance No. No. 2327 16. GN 98-102 Adopting the Tax Rate for 1998- Ordinance No. 2328 17. GN 98-103 Adopting the 1998-99 Budget - Ordinance No. 2329 18. GN 98-104 Consider Ordinance to Extend for 120 Days the Moratorium on Permits for Electronic Message Board Signs - Ordinance No. 2331 19. GN 98-106 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant - Public Hearing 20. GN 98-108 Interlocal Agreement with City of Keller for Reconstruction of Shady Grove Road - Resolution No. 98-39 21. GN 98-109 Approve Contract for TNRCC FY99 Solid Waste Grant #99-04-G11 for Public Outreach Programs for Residential Solid Waste Reduction - Resolution No. 98-46 22. GN 98-113 Setting Maximum Basic Cable and Installation Rates for Marcus Cable - Resolution No. 98-42 Page 4 . .. '. . . Page 5 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 23. GN 98-114 Public Hearing to Consider Creation of Reinvestment Zone Number One - Ordinance No. 2333 24. GN 98-115 Direct Staff to Draft Specifics for Developing a North Davis Overlay District 25. (a) Citizens Presentation (b) Information and Reports 26. Adjournment POSTED q-/1-1? Date d:óY £J1rL 1ìme e C;ty Secreta", _. ~~ INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 98-182 ~ Date: T Subject: September 14,1998 NETS Funding e Specialized Transportation Service in North Richland Hills is provided by the Northeast Transportation Service (NETS). NETS provides door-to-door service to the elderly and disadvantaged in the northeast Tarrant County area, Priority is given to individuals needing transportation to medical appointments or work, The primary source of funding for NETS comes from the FederallSTEA grant, with the rest coming from the State and member cities. For next year, the U.S. Congress has revamped the ISTEA grant program, now called TEA-21 (Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century). While many of the changes are beneficial to the City, it has also eliminated funding for some suburban transportation services such as NETS. Due to this loss of federal funding, NETS faces the following: 1, Effective October 1,1998, TEA-21 cuts funding for transportation services to any urbanized area with a population greater than 200,000, The D/FW area has been combined and classified as one urbanized area that exceeds the population requirement. This will cause NETS to lose $216,000 in federal funding, 45% of their total budget. e 2. The State of Texas requires that a recipient of state transportation fund.s also receive federal transportation funds, Therefore, TEA-21 indirectly cuts state operating assistance as well. NETS is working to secure this funding for next year even though the federal grant has been eliminated. The amount for 98/99 is $78,697 3. The Fort Worth Transportation Authority (The T) has been serving as the "pass- through" agent for federal funding designated for NETS (the City of North Richland Hills is the pass-through for state funding). Effective October 1,1998, the T can not continue its role as the designated federal pass-through agent. Currently, NETS is working with member cities to explore options for addressing this shortfall. In the short term, the cites have agreed to accelerate their payments to NETS. While payments are normally made quarterly, the cities will pay the first two quarters in advance. e Efforts are underway to save the federal funding, remove the federal match requirement from the stipulations to receive the state funding, and explore all options ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS ~. ~~ ··H.~. ~.·'.>'.-i:'."""""~'''-~~''';~''..'.. _.... , . IR 98-182 for future funding. The NCTCOG hosted a meeting on Friday, September 4,1998, and invited affected cities and agencies, Several options were discussed and the group consensus was to request that NCTCOG staff work with the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) to explore both short term and long term options involving local, state, and federal funding. Mayor Pro Tern Don Phifer and City staff attend RTC meetings and will be able to provide progress reports on this situation, Respectfully Submitted, ~l~ City Manager e -2- e ~. ~~"~""'" "-'~'':'''''''."-,.-, , ... "........"'......-',-.,.,.".".....-,.......~"_..,.......""-".... ...' . ..'""""~....,._..~....,.,."".._.-- . e e .- "'. . , ~ro~~ e\ \~ ~ m¡ e. l . . ...~ . * . .,!... ........ TARRANT COUNTY NORTHEASTSUB~URTHOUSE 645 GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY, SUITE 6 HURST, TEXAS 760S4 (817) 581-3600 FAX (817) 581-3603 B. GLEN WHITLEY COONTY COMMISSIONER PREClNCl NO.3 August 17, 1998 Honorable Mayor Charles Scoma City of North Richland Hills 7301 E, Loop 820 p, O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-609 Dear Mayor Scoma: The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) eliminated operating assistance under the Urbanized Area Fonnula Program (Section 5307) for areas over 200,000 in population, This cut will greatly impact our Northeast Transportation Service (NETS) and other services in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan area that received operating assistance. As a consequence, many agencies providing services to the elderly and disabled are struggling to address the deficit that will be brought on by these changes in funding. With the elimination of funding for operating assistance, it is likely that the services to the elderly and disabled will be significantly reduced. I want you to know that this situation is of great concern to me and to the other members of the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC). At a recent committee meeting at the National Association of Counties Conference (NACO), I listed the resolution of this problem as a priority issue for support by NACO. At that meeting, I was also able to discuss the problem with a Congressman who serves on the Transportation Committee. R TC understands this problem and believes that such reductions are in opposition to the goals of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The RTC has been working with Congressman Martin Frost, encouraging his efforts to correct the problem imposed by the e e e :"..,.,..~_._. ........-. . . Page 2 restrictions of this legislation. In the interim, agencies must explore alternatives, Please be assured that RTC is aware of the critical need of the elderly and disabled and is looking at possible alternatives under sections of TEA-21, I am hopeful that changes will be made in the legislation; and that alternatives within TEA-21 will be available to assist in the funding of these very vital programs, I would encourage you to write to our senators and representatives and ask them to support changes to correct this problem, Yours truly, /ðAw B. Glen Whitley County Commissioner Precinct Three INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 98-184 * Date: September 10, 1998 Subject: Agenda for Meetings with Planning and Zoning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment - September 15, 1998 . Council is scheduled to have a meeting with the Zoning Board of Adjustment beginning at 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, September 15 and with the Planning and Zoning Commission at 7:30 p.m., on September 15, both of which will be in the Pre-Council room. We requested of both the City Council members and the members from each of these boards to identify any items that they wanted to discuss at these meetings. Attached is a list of the items that we have received from City Council members and from representatives of these two boards for discussion. It was staffs understanding that Council wanted to review this list of items to set an agenda for the work session with these two committees. Respectfully submitted, . ~!~ City Manager LJC/ld e ISSU ED BY TH E CITY MANAG ER NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS e e en ~ en ~ (!) ~ :æ: 2co ~~ <C~ (!)It) ~;t ~UJ ~~ Q.~ ..!.Ih wen :t en 1IJ ~ o a. f3 0::: e z º tJ) ~ :IE :IE o o N oð 0.. "C 0) > .~ 0) a::: 0) c o Z . ..J Õ z ;:) o o o - en c 0) coO) 'c ~ ~ ~ ~ ()E CO 0) oE I rn:I:O a::: ~ "C U "C a.. «() rn c O)..c0 CO CO ~_:I: õ E ø ~ co·~ "C C ~ .æ ø I E 0)« >- c rn Z a::: "Eenõ£; 1::: COrn -> U c coca:::~ 0) c - c CO en rl\ ~ c 0 ~ 0 .- ;;> ~o>- ~~~ ~en -~Ornc m~~~ 1::: rn 0 E Õ 0) -º a.. a.. '-' - 0) I CO'- 0 ~O) ~u~2~ øø ~O)E~Ern -õ..c ~ () - - w C)..c_ .~ ....0) 0) ..cO) 'õ ~ « ~ - 0 rn .- rn c C) 0) C .... .... cO).... w.... 0 C ::J C _ C ..c ._ co a.. .- rn _ rn 0 'õ a.. .... 0 tT '::.- "C .- - ::J ï=\ ::J .....c co::> ....- a..~0)8ð ~~ ....rn~C)tT~O ..c> EO) ~ ë .!2 a::: 0) c ¡; .g ~ c 0 c & C) u ::> N () E cO) C) 0) g 0) - 0) .... co 0) .Q ~ :s .5 ..c êï> oð :s c E (/) g> ()~ £; a.. ñi a::: ñi co'::; ~ .~ ~ =:: a.. 0 ,c¿ :2 '2 ~ (/).... .... 0 C C) êi5 _ m ~ ~ ~ Q)'¡:: Q),-,(/)o0«cocco ~ C 0_;;> c~....O) g....O)N~(/)øow (/)C)co~C)coQ)a:::O)~""~a.. co .g a::: > -.... .... U . ~ - .5 .¡:: c.5 0 Q) :2 -.g c I C(/)C)æO)Q)coco~Q)~cO)~~~oen.æ~=-Q) :s ~ c :J C c Q) .- Q) cEo ~ .- Q) ~ c - == 'c () 0 Q) ....Q)E "C~a:::ë_c E~ Q)coo~ c-=:: O~::J~Q)o_Q)Q)co~(/)'-'ëi"C::J...._::JE::J"C-E c ~ .- c 0) vu "C ......c .- 0 en Q)'- .- (/) Q) co 0 0 ~ Q) co () C E Q) '(ñ g u 6- a.. I t:: C ~ ~ .~ en E U £; E ~~ &~o:2Q)o Q) ~::J 0 ~>o ~o mø ena..:I:ena:::u a::: a:::u u >~u ~u . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e e CI) ~ CI) ~ ..... a:¡ i! ~ "-) Q c:(CIC) u..0) o~ Q 11)" a::..... ~Jt CX»~ (!)~ a:fo; ~fb NCI) I ..... W :t CI) Ll.I ~ o a.. f3 a:: e .... Z w ::E .... en ::) ""') c « u.. o C 0:: « o m C) z - z o N B c: co c: :e o c: C) ü5 I "C Q) c: ¡¡:: Q) o f/) c. :c f/) 'E co :I: . ...J o z ::) o o "C c: co .9- C) .c c: f/) 'õ 'EC) co Q) :1:..0 CO"C f/)- .- ::J -0 CO.c .cC/) ~« c:cc f/) ON c: f/) c: ~ ~O _co .- C:Õ ::J Q) Q) . C) f/)L.."C Q) c: .- L.. L.. oOco C) U c: 0 .S 0 0 ]J 12 -Q).c .::; Q) "C :t::: ..... E '(3 ~ ..0 OQ)~ ~ f/) U 0 .~ f/)1::==> f/)ogg~ 8E:-::J::J o co 0 0 «UUU . . . . - e e ,-. ..... ..... ,~. -'. ....~ - .. ,...~ INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 98-185 ~ Date: 'T Subject: September 10, 1998 Schedule for future meetings with Board and Commissions In an effort to meet with all of the Boards and Commissions of the City the Council decided to set aside from 6:00 to 9:00 p.m. on the first Tuesday after the first City Council meeting of the month to meet with such boards for approximately one and a half hours each, Following the September 15 meeting with the first Boards, the next meetings will be October 13, November 10 and December 15. Staff would like to have an idea as to which boards you would prefer to meet with on these three months so that we can begin scheduling those. Respectfully submitted, ~Unningha City Manager LJC/ld ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS e e e " ,.:"'":''' ·_Co"."".:,'" "..J.....,:.. ..~,',:.'n..'('.\~:-,'....'"",'.;.,.:.-:.''!1,. INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 98-183 ~ Date: T Subject: September 10, 1998 Council Travel Policy and Conferences At a recent City Council work session the Council discussed various issues related to Council Travel and requested that Council use primarily the travel policies used by the City staff. Since not all Council Members were familiar with the staff travel policy, we have furnished this to each Council Member and have requested any suggested changes or updates to the policy. Attached is a draft travel policy for the Mayor and City Council. The primary changes relate to a clear statement that travel expenses of spouses that accompany council members on business related trips and conferences will be authorized for payment by the City. We have also increased the meal Per Diem slightly from $25,00 to $30.00 daily. Per Diem is paid in situations in which receipts are not available for actual expenses of meals, In other words actual meal costs can be reimbursed 100% when valid receipts are received. The other option is to just simply take a Per Diem on meals. The travel policy is still in draft form so if Council has any further changes we can do that. If it is all right as written we can put it in final form. We have also attached a copy of the proposed Council Travel for 1998/99 for your review and consideration. If you have any questions on any of this prior to the meeting certainly feel free to give us a call. Respectfully submitted, , ~~y~ Larry J. Cunningham City Manager LJC/ld ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS PROPOSED COUNCIL TRAVEL 1998/99 e Conference/Meetinas Dates Comments Mayor/Council: TML CONFERENCE 10/28-31/98 Extremely good San Antonio NLC CONGRESS OF CITIES 12/1-5/98 F air to good Kansas City, MO NLC CONGRESSIONAL CITY 3/5-9/99 Extremely good Washington, D.C, AMCC CONFERENCE 7/16-19/99 Extremely good (Association of Mayors, (especially newly Council and Commissioners) elected officials) Lubbock TML LEADERSHIP Dates to be announced Generally very good CONFERENCES e Locations unknown Mayor: U.S, CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 1/27-29/99 Extremely good Washington, D.C. U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 6/11-15/99 Good New Orleans, LA Other (Councilor Mayor): TML or NLC LEGISLATIVE Usually in Spring Very good to COMMITTEES (various times, or Summer participate in. generally one day to and from Austin (TML), sometimes over night) SPECIAL STUDY COMMITTEES Throughout Year Sometimes good, OF TML(various locations in Texas) depending on subject and applicable to NRH at the time. e e SUBJECT e e DRAFT t- CITY COUNCIL POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE PAGE OF CC - 0001 September 14, 1998 1 3 TRAVEL POLICY REV SUPERCEDES APPROVED I. GENERAL: II. Council and Mayor travel and training functions are generally planned during the budget process. In some instances lack of foreknowledge of an event precludes this. In any case, the total amount budgeted for Council Department's travel will not be exceeded without approval of the City Council. This policy shall apply to the Mayor and Council and their accompanying spouses of the City of North Richland Hills for attending conferences, educational meetings and business trips. Mayor and Council travel must be authorized either in the approved budget, or if not in the budget, the Mayor or Council member must seek approval for the travel. References in this policy to Council refers to both Mayor and Council. TRAVEL AUTHORIZATION: A Travel Authorization Form must be prepared and approved by the appropriate parties prior to any Council member (and their accompanying spouse) traveling at city expense, The form shall include a description of the function to be attended, dates, purpose and an itemized estimate of all expenses associated with the trip, The estimates should include both prepaid expenses (such as registration and airfare) and costs required for gratuities, accommodations, food, etc. Travel expenses of spouses accompanying Council members are authorized for payment by the City. The completed form must be approved by the Finance Director and forwarded to the Budget Division for verification that funds are available. The Budget Division will then forward the form to the City Manager's Office for approval. Upon approval, the Finance Department will process requests for an advance when needed. The Travel Authorization Form will be kept on file until matched with the Council's Travel Expense Report Form after trip completion. A Travel Authorization Form is not required for business travel when all of the following conditions exist: A. Total anticipated expenses are less than $250.00. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AD-001A e e e CITY COUNCIL POLICY SUBJECT NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE September 14, 1998 PAGE 2 OF TRAVEL POLICY Cc-ooo 1 REV 3 SUPERCEDES APPROVED B. An advance for travel expenses is not requested, C. Expenses will be charged on a credit card or reimbursed after returning. D. Travel is preapproved by the Finance Director, indicating that funds are available. III. MEALS AND GRATUITIES: The Council has two options relative to expenditures for meals and gratuities: A. Council may be reimbursed for actual expenses to the extent that they are supported by valid receipts. B. The Council may receive a $30.00 daily per diem. This represents the standard amount which is allowable for meals and gratuities whereby receipts are not necessary . Meals and gratuities are considered reimbursable or a per diem is applicable no earlier than the evening before the meeting/seminar begins and concluding no later than the evening the meeting/seminar ends. When the per diem option is selected, it may be allocated as follows: Breakfast $6.00 Lunch $9.00 - Dinner $15.00 - IV. TRAVEL EXPENSE REPORT: The Travel Expense Report must be submitted to the Finance Director within ten working days following trip completion. Failure to comply may, at the discretion of the City Council, result in deduction of the travel advance from the Council's next paycheck. Any funds due the city will be paid to Central Cashier. Central Cashier will accept cash or checks and issue a receipt. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AD-001A CITY COUNCIL POLICY e SUBJECT NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE PAGE OF CC-0001 September 14, 1998 3 3 TRAVEL POLICY REV SUPERCEDES APPROVED V. FINANCE DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES: The Finance Director will be the primary administrator for Travel Authorization Forms and Travel Expense Reports Forms. When A Council member has not submitted a Travel Expense Report within ten working days, the Council member will be contacted by the Finance Director to determine if extenuating circumstances exist. If not, the Mayor will be notified and the payroll section may also be notified of any prepaid travel advances that are to be withheld from the employee's next paycheck. When expense reports are submitted, they will be reviewed for accuracy. Receipts and/or credit card copies must match the Travel Expense Report. Any exceptions to this requirement will be handled based on the circumstances, with benefit to the city being the primary consideration. VI. TRANSPORTATION: e To the maximum extent possible, the least expensive mode of travel shall be used as the basis for transportation reimbursement. This may be by air carrier, train, rental or personal vehicle. Should a Council member elect to use a personal vehicle, reimbursement may be based on car rental rate plus fuel cost, or at the rate allocated by the Federal Government for Income Tax purposes for auto use (currently 32.5 cents per mile). Transportation for non-conference or non-business meeting trips shall be excluded from reimbursement by the city. VII. NON-ALLOWABLE EXPENSES: Expenses of a personal nature will not be reimbursed by the City. VIII. FORMS: Copies attached: Travel Authorization Form Travel Expense Report Form e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AD-001A TRAVEL AUTHORIZATION FORM TA 1098 e Department Expense Account No. Amount of Requelt Person Attending Conference: Purpose and Place of Trip: Date Advance Needed Conference Dates: From To Budgeted Item: eYes o No (If no, explanation of funding source): ESTIMATES OF COST e TRANSPORTATION EXPENSE: MEALS: lODGING: TUITION & REGISTRATION FEE: AUTO RENTAL (If Applicable): MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE (To Include Gratuities): TOTAL ANTICIPATED EXPENSES: lESS - (Itemize Prepaid Expenses): 1. 2. 3. 4. NET EXPENSES ANTICIPATED: I do hereby certify the above estimates of expense to be fairly stated. Sufficient fundI are available from the approved budget or transfer II approved. Employee Requesting Advance Director of Finance City Manager/Asst. City Manager Department Head FAilURE TO SUBMIT A TRAVEL EXPENSE STATEMENT WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS FOllOWING RETURN Will BE IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF CITY POLICY AND MAY RESULT IN THE AMOUNT ADVANCED BEING DEDUCTED FROM THE NEXT PAYROll CHECK. e Accounting Ule Only Amount of Check: Polted Date: Due Date/Expense Statement: Check No. Intltsll: Date: e CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS TRAVEL EXPENSE REPORT Name: Job Title: Purpose and Place of Trip: Departure Date: Travel Authorization No. Employee Travel on: Date: Dept.: o Per Diem LODGING & REGISTRATION Return Date: Funds Advanced by City: S o Expense Reimbursement AMOUNTS TRANSPORTATION MEALS INCLUDING TIPS AMOUNT 'Ie Miles Vehicles On MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES DATE ITEM AMOUNT )PICC I TOTAL MISC EXPENSES EXPlANATION OF UNUSUAL EXPENSES Expense Account No. Journal Entry No, P-;ed Date: . JI: DATE imEAKFASl LUNCH DINNER TOTAL TOTAL MEALS TOTAL EXPENSES TOTAL LOOGINGlREGISTRATION TOTAL TRANSPORTATION TOTAL MEALS TOTAL MISC. EXPENSES TOTAL EXPENSES LESS: EX PO BY CREDIT CARD LESS: EX PO BY CfTY (ADV,) LESS: TRAVELADVANCERECE~D BALANCE DUE EMPlOYEE BALANCE DUE CITY Submitted By: Employee Signature Approved By: Department Head Verified By: Finance Department . . . INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IR 98-181 No. G.. 0 ~.ç::==- p~ Date: September 14, 1998 Subject: Special Presentation - Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for Fiscal Year 1997-98. The City of North Richland Hills has received the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for its Comprehensive Annual Budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1997. The Budget Award is a prestigious national award presented by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation of exemplary budget documents. The Distinguished Budget Presentation Award is valid for a period of one year only. The City has received a Distinguished Budget Presentation award for the last eight consecutive years. In 1982, the Government Finance Officers Association's Committee on Government Budgeting and Management began a series of studies regarding "good budgetary practices." One result of this study was a conclusion that the association should formally encourage exemplary budgeting practices. The GFOA Executive Board approved the introduction of an Awards Program for Distinguished Budget Presentation that would recognize exemplary efforts by governments and nonprofit organizations. Governments participating in the program submit copies of their approved budget documents for review by an impartial panel of budget experts. Each budget document is evaluated using a comprehensive checklist with four major categories. These major functions include the document as a policy tool, an operations guide, a financial plan and a communications medium. The focus of the Budget Review program is on the management elements of the budget document and its effectiveness in a policy and public environment. Its emphasis on Performance Measures bring accountability to government through documentation and further assist City Council and Management through long range policy planning for the City's future. It is generally found that jurisdictions whose budget documents are properly prepared tend to avoid many of the common weaknesses in governmental financial management. The program encourages participants to address the needs of elected officials, the public and interested parties in the financial policies of the City, and encourages guidance in operations improvements. It helps avoid the tendency of budgets to become static, direction less financial documents. A good budget document also provides an excellent opportunity to communicate with the public, the financial community and the press. It reinforces the needs of nontechnicians to obtain a general understanding of governmental finance through the budget document. Nell Lange, Director of Administration, North Central Texas Council of Governments and immediate past President of GFOA of Texas will be at the Council meeting to present the Distinguished Budget Award to the City. No action is needed by Council, but we do commend Debbie Durko, Budget Coordinator, and the Budget staff for their professional efforts in the City's receiving this prestigious award for the eighth consecutive year. This award represents a total team effort starting with the leadership of City Council and Management, and reflects the hard work of each City Department. Respectfully submitted, ~~ U Larry Koonce Director of Finance ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS . MINUTES OF THE GOAL SETTING WORK SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD AT GARRET CREEK RANCH CONFERENCE CENTER, ROUTE 2, BOX 235, PARADISE, TEXAS - JUNE 19-20, 1998 Present: Charles Scoma Don Phifer Lyle E. Welch Russell Mitchell Frank Metts, Jr. JoAnn Johnson Matt Milano Cheryl Cowen Lyman Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Staff: Larry Cunningham Randy Shiflet Ron Ragland Patricia Hutson James Saint City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Assistant to City Manager e The City Council met June 19, 1998 from 2:00 p.m. to approximately 9: 15 p,m, and June 20, 1998 from 8:00 a.m. to 3: 15 p.m. for the purpose of setting goals, Mr. Lyle Sumek, Lyle Sumek and Associates, Inc., was the facilitator for the work session. Mr. Sumek discussed with the Council the outcomes and objectives for the work session. Mr. Sumek discussed 6 elements that make a Council effective. He discussed that an effective Council: 1) governs _ focuses on the vision and transforms it into goals for the future and outcomes for the community; 2) knows the community; 3) involves the citizens; 4) sets direction; 5) makes decisions; and 6) values team work; focuses on "we" and not on "I", Mr. Sumek discussed with the Council the establishment of House Rules and a Council Code of Conduct. The Council discussed the need and importance to: 1, Have patience with each other, the need to trust the other individual and citizens 2, Recognize that the majority decides, support the majority as Council's decision and go forth 3. Be consistent in decisions and the process 4. Focus on Council/team goals and targets, the mission and use in Council's decisions 5. Be willing to change ways - be creative and willing to change process - avoid use of word "precedent" and restricting themselves 6. Focus on the city - handle the issue without the influence of an election 7. Allow each other to discuss the item fully and recognize differences in styles 8. Be on time 9. Dress Code - dress appropriately - pride and dignity of Council 10. Respect the various roles of leadership - the City Manager, Mayor, City Council. . e e e Goal Setting Work Session Minutes June 19-20, 1998 Page 2 The Council concluded that the following should be the House Rules and Council Code of Conduct: 1. Be honest. 2. Do homework - Be prepared prior to meeting. Be prepared to discuss issue - consider other's opinions and insights. 3. Treat each other with respect - focus on the issue and avoid personal attacks. Respect each other's decision. 4. Focus on Council/Team Goals & Targets, the City's mission and use in Council decisions. 5. Work together as a team. 6. Be willing to listen - have an open mind; avoid prejudging. 7. Debate issues in public, not in the paper. 8. Allow each other to discuss the item fully and recognize differences in style. The City Council established the following vision statement: "NRH: Our Vision The City of Choice for Families - To Live - To Work - To Play". The Council discussed and established a list of six goals for 2008 which are summarized below: 1. People Feeling Safe and Secure A. Low crime rate, low fire loss, favorable IOS rating B. People feeling safe, any place, any time: public perception C. Safe schools for youth D. Active presence in the community - police high visibility, work with citizens in a preventative approach E. Safe streets 2. Quality Development Through Build Out A. Raised standards: streetscape, zoning, codes, landscaping B. Balanced mixed-use development integrating residential and commercial C. Effective code enforcement - maintaining and enhancing quality and residential D. Revitalize older areas of city - commercial and residential E. Plans and zoning to reflect city goals F. Protection of home value and ownership G. Community pride and identity - increase our image to ourselves (community) and others outside Goal Setting Work Session Minutes June 19-20, 1998 Page 3 e 3. Self Sustaining Local Economy A. Expanded diversified tax base, reducing the burden on homeowners B. Successful Town Center - community focal point C. Retention of local businesses D. Redevelopment and revitalized commercial areas, including the Mall and commercial strips E. Attractive high quality business along major corridors (interstate/highways) F. Work through public/private partnerships G. International relations/business/cultural exchange (sister cities) 4. Financially Sound City Government Providing Cost Effective Services Affordable For Our Citizens A. Lower tax rate for homeowners through diversified sources of revenues B. Reduced/minimal debt - strong financial reserves C. Well maintained city facilities and infrastructure D. Cost effective delivery of services E. Use of community resources - private sector, community organizations, citizens F. Seek financed contributions from our community organizations, school district on regional facilities e 5. A Variety of Amenities for Families - Recreational/Leisure/Cultural/Educational A. Range of recreational programs available for all ages provided by city and private sector B. Strong library as an educational/learning center and informational center C. Expanded cultural opportunities working with the private sector and community D. Quality parks, open space and trails accessible to citizens E. Strong support and partnerships with the community F. Recognize regional resources - financial break for our citizens; Tap our community resources (proactive approach) 6. Effective Transportation System For Moving People/Integrating Multiple Modes A. Well maintained quality streets for city, county, and state B. Effective use of rail as a link to the metroplex, convenience for moving people, incorporate in land use surrounding C. Expand use of trails as a mode of transportation D. Reduced congestion on major interstate/highways E. Improved traffic safety F. New financial methods on major projects - responsible for project In addition to the goals set above, the Council also considered and discussed the following: The Council however did not establish them as goals. e 7. Strong Community Pride and Identity A. Developed "community infrastructure" community organizations/institutions working in partnership B. Separate identity as "NRH" - separate from Fort Worth and neighboring cities C. Active marketing for North Richland Hills D. Sense of uniqueness and history "small town for families" Goal Setting Work Session Minutes June 19-20, 1998 Page 4 e E. Choice for families - all generations - our kids returning to our community 8. Protection of Our Home Investment A. Emphasis on home ownership; single family homes B. Well maintained, attractive homes and businesses through effective code enforcement C. Maintained/increased value of homes D. Homes affordable for all generations of families/young families to seniors E. Range of housing choices - stay in the community Mr. Sumek reviewed with the Council the targets for action for 1998 that were established at a previous goal setting workshop on February 6, 1998. 1. Zoning Ordinance: Review Decision on land use ad hoc committee; finalize process for review; establish guidelines; objectives charge; draft ordinance; conduct public hearing; decision on ordinance amendments; and establish policy for annual review. 2. Sewer Project Implementation EPA Ruling; design and plan - priority 1 improvements; design and plan - priority 2 improvements. e 3. Arcadia Project Mid-cities overlay zones evaluation and decision; review final plans and study; and decision on Arcadia project/overlay zones. 4. Code Enforcement Direction and Policy Decision on Code Enforcement Ad Hoc Committee; identify problems and concerns; define "code enforcement"; evaluate current conditions and standards; research standards used by other cities; establish policy; finalize standards; determine staffing needs; and decision on policy standards and resources. 5. Richland Plaza Center Direction Work with developer: grant permit to upgrade/improve Montgomery Wards building; city participation in drainage project; Council direction on feasibility of TIF; decision on TIF schedule and implementation; address drainage issue: sale bonds; finalize design and engineering, complete project. 6. Crime Control District: Evaluation & Direction Evaluate original strategic plan and budget; review expenditures; evaluate effectiveness and impacts; and decision on continuation of Crime Control District. 7. Landscape Ordinance Incorporate as part of Zoning Ordinance; explore options used by other cities - landscape regulations; identify "under landscaped" "acceptable landscape"; revise ordinance; public hearings; and decision on ordinance and revisions. e Goal Setting Work Session Minutes June 19-20, 1998 Page 5 - 8. Park System Master Plan Conduct citizen survey; develop draft plan by steering committee; review plan by Council; and reach a decision. The Council discussed whether any revisions needed to be made to the previously set targets. The Council decided that because Targets No.2, 5 and 8 were in progress, they should be removed from the list. Target NO.1 was revised to also include revision of the Land Use Plan and the need to address overlay zones. Target NO.3 was revised from the Arcadia Project to Town Center: Direction and from Mid-Cities to multiple overlay zones. Target NO.6 was revised to include the need to refine the Crime District Board, It was also felt that the Crime Board needed a mission statement and the functions needed to be defined. It was felt that the Crime Board needed to give guidance and direction. The Council also felt that a strategy for the continuation of the District needed to be developed. The Council decided that in Target No. 7 the incorporation of the Landscape Ordinance as part of the Zoning Ordinance should be deleted and that a review should be conducted of the options used by other cities. The Council discussed additional targets for action, the action needed and the needed decision, which are summarized as follows: e 9. Cultural & Educational Plan for North Richland Hills Decision on the cultural and educational ad hoc committees, the purpose & charge; work with business community, TCJC, BISD, and community organizations; establish cultural/educational goals; evaluate community needs and opportunities; explore mechanisms for funding, including a community foundation; define the city's role and come to a decision on the direction. 10. Performance Evaluation Process for City Manager, City Secretary, and City Attorney Develop performance standards and process and complete evaluations during the year. 11. North Hills Mall: Revitalization Strategy Work with new owners; develop plan with owners - how the City can help in rejuvenating Mall; determine City's role; and finalize strategy and plan of action. 12. Community Information & Marketing Plan Evaluate current information approaches; explore approaches used by other cities and reach their citizens; understand workable approaches to North Richland Hills; and develop communication and marketing plan. 13. City Organization Structure Review Evaluate the organization structure in light of the Council's visions, goals, mission, cost effectiveness of services: explore options - structure, service delivery; and revise organizational structure. e Goal Setting Work Session Minutes June 19-20, 1998 Page 6 e 14. Board/Commissions: Review & Direction Review purposes, accomplishments, role; determine need - current/future; refocus purpose, role; revise structure, appointment process; identify role of staff; and reach a decision. 15. Road Improvements Complete major projects - Hightower, Rufe Snow, Davis Blvd.; how people will be impacted by the State projects; identify future projects. 16. Charter: Review Determine needs, issues; create charter review committee; revise charter; Council decision; and possible charter amendment election. 17. Design Standards for Development/Redevelopment Develop interim design standards - short term and increase design standards; support the "Development Review Committee"; develop "overlay zones"; develop separate landscape design ordinance and remove from the Zoning Ordinance; and reach a decision on Davis Boulevard development/redevelopment. 18. Contracts with Organizations Using Facilities Review contracts, charges for our citizens' benefits; establish policy direction and standard e (consistent with goals); and reach a decision. The Council ranked the targets to set the top priorities. The following were set as top priority: Target NO.1: Land Use Plan Revision/Zoning Ordinance Review, Target No, 17: Design Standards for Redevelopment/Redevelopment, Target No, 3: Town Center: Direction; Target NO.4: Code Enforcement Direction and Policy; Target NO.7: Landscape Ordinance. The following were set as high priority: Target NO.6: Crime Control District - Evaluation and Direction; Target NO.9: Cultural & Educational Plan for North Richland Hills; Target No. 10: Performance Evaluation Process for City Manager, City Secretary and City Attorney; Target No. 14: Boards/Commission - Review and Direction. The Council discussed their expectations, the role and purposes of City government. The Council concluded the following summary as the Council's Mission for North Richland Hills: 1. Progressive Leadership for City · Defined vision, goals, plan of action · Anticipating issues and opportunities · Sensitivity to community's goals · Innovative action based upon creative thinking, analysis · Willingness to try new ideas and approaches e 2. Community Involved as Partners · Development of "community infrastructure" · Working together of governments, churches, community institutions, civic/community organization Goal Setting Work Session Minutes June 19-20, 1998 Page 7 e · Well informed citizenry - knowledge of city government, our programs and service · Stakeholders feeling access to open government - city officials listening and appreciating · Appropriate involvement of citizens in city government · Sensitive to impact of city actions on citizens 3. High Quality City Services: Responsive to Citizens Provided in Cost Effective Manner · Well designed and maintained city infrastructure and facilities · Defined service levels - acceptable to citizens, citizens see "value added' to their lives . Resources for our citizens · Responsible to citizen needs - guided by "Best for our City" · Financial "stewardship" - concern about cost effectiveness/relationship to our visions & goals · Willingness to partner with other governments, private sectors, community organizations 4. Preserving, Enhancing our Community Character & Quality of Life: Vision, Goals, Value · Sensitive to impact of policies, decisions and programs on community · Making North Richland Hills "The Choice City for Families" · Enhance pride ownership in our community · Explore new ways to enhance our character, our quality of life · Incorporating our visions, goals, values into daily, operational decisions and actions e · Maintain our sense of history 5. Protect the Interest of our "Stakeholders" · Quality and value of homes and property values · Visual appearance of our community . Safety of our citizens · Land regulation and codes · Balance: enforcement with prevention and education · Citizens work as responsible partners e The role of Mayor and City Council was discussed. The Mayor's role, as set out in the Charter, was discussed. The Council also viewed the Mayor's role as being an advocate, providing community leadership, an image maker and a spokesperson for the City. The Council felt the role of the Mayor was also to focus on Council direction and goals, to set the tone and bring the Council to a decision moving the organization forward toward the goals and objectives, It was felt the Council's primary role is to be a goal setter, decision maker and interpreter. Their secondary role includes being an advocate, moderator, problem solver, image maker, representative and watch dog. The Council discussed the structure and processes for the Council meetings. There was discussion concerning any Council Member being able to bring an item to the agenda. The Council discussed that the purpose of the Pre-Council Meeting was to prepare for the meeting, receive information and to ask questions of other Council Members and Staff, and to have an informal time to exchange information among the Mayor, Council and Staff. There was discussion on the need for the citizens to see the Council do public business in public. It was agreed that items needing action would be brought to Pre- Council for discussion and would then be placed on the next Council agenda or a future e e e Goal Setting Work Session Minutes June 19-20, 1998 Page 8 agenda for action, The Council agreed that they preferred not to discuss action items for the first time in Pre-Council and then take action on the items the same night. The Mayor discussed with the Council how he would like for Council meetings to be conducted. Robert's Rules of Order are to be followed. The motion is to be placed on the table, the motion seconded, and then discussion will follow. It was agreed that a Council Member wishing to make a motion will use his request to speak button at the Council dais and the Mayor will recognize the Council Member. The Council Member may then make the motion. The second to the motion can be made without being recognized by the Chair. After the motion has been made and seconded, then the Council may discuss or debate the item. The Mayor will restate the motion in general prior to the vote. The Council agreed the Mayor would use his discretion in how long an individual will speak. The speakers should address the Chair. If there are several present to speak on the same subject, the Council would like for a spokesperson to speak for the group where possible. During lengthy, public debates any Council Member may ask the Chair for a recess. The Mayor will then call for a vote for the recess. The request for a recess will not need a second. The consensus of the Council was that it be mandatory for an individual or applicant requesting a public hearing to either be present or to have a representative present for the public hearing and council action. Applicants are to be told that they or a representative must be present at the Council meeting or the Council will postpone action on their item. The Mayor advised that information and reports would be made during the Council meetings to keep the citizens/public informed. It will also be up to the discretion of the Chair to move an item forward in the agenda. The Council discussed the appointment process for ad hoc committees. The Council discussed two appointment processes for the three proposed ad hoc committees, The first option was for appointments to be made to the committees after the mission, parameters and guidelines have been established and approved by the Council. The second option was for Council to authorize the ad hoc committees before names are submitted for the committees. The Council discussed the need for future ad hoc committees to be authorized before names are submitted for the committees. Mr. Lyle Sumek agreed to meet again with the Council at a later date to bring a conclusion to this meeting. The meeting adjourned at 3: 15 p.m. on June 20. APPROVED: Charles Scoma - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary e MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE PRE-COUNCIL ROOM AT CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS - JUNE 30,1998 Present: Charles Scoma Don Phifer Lyle E. Welch Russell Mitchell Frank Metts, Jr. JoAnn Johnson Matt Milano Cheryl Cowen Lyman Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Staff: Larry Cunningham Randy Shiflet Ron Ragland Patricia Hutson James Saint City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Assistant to City Manager Mayor Scoma called the work session to order at 4:00 p.m. e 1. CONTINUE GOALS RETREAT Mr. Lyle Sumek, Lyle Sumek and Associates, Inc., who was the facilitator at the June 19 and 20 Goals Work Session, was present and continued the Council's discussion from the goals retreat on procedures for establishing ad hoc committees, The Council also discussed performance expectations for the Mayor, City Council, Mayor Pro Tem and City Manager, The Council agreed that the Mayor Pro Tern: 1) is not a figurehead, but is a support for the Mayor 2) serves as a sounding board for ideas, is a resource for information and keeps communication open with the Council 3) assists in moving the Council forward to achieve their goals and objectives 4) fills in for the Mayor in his absence at ceremonial functions and chairing of meetings 5) brings concerns of the Council to the Mayor's attention 6) provides to the Mayor a "sense of the Council" (not acquired from lobbying or polling) keeping Mayor informed and aware of issues. Guidelines for Council inquiries were agreed upon. Requests for information that is involved will be directed to the City Manager's office. The City Manager will also send information that is requested by one Council Member and that has to be researched and is time consuming, to the entire Council. Requests that will take several hours for Staff to compile, will be taken to the Council for approval. The City Manager will use his discretion. Information that is provided to a Council Member and will be used in a Council meeting will also be sent to all Council members. - Work Session Minutes June 30, 1998 Page 2 e The Council discussed staff reports and the continuation of highlighting significant events/items of interest. There was discussion on the need for all legal opinions to be in writing. Staff reports on lawsuits should be more detailed with enough time allotted for legal reports, The Council asked that when the Council makes a decision based on the legal recommendation of the attorney, that it be documented by putting the legal recommendation in writing. Legal research should be complete and include current law and case law. The Council agreed that a work session was needed on new legal exposures and liabilities. While discussing the role of the Mayor, the Council agreed that the Mayor was the spokesperson for the City. Council should refer issues to the City Manager, the Mayor or the Mayor Pro Tem. The Council briefly discussed TML, NLC and continuing education activities. The Council discussed the importance of supporting those members serving on policy committees. The Council requested monthly or quarterly briefings to keep the Council informed of work shop and committee activities of the other Council members. The Mayor recessed the meeting at 6:50 p.m. The Mayor called the meeting back to order at 6:58 p.m. with the same Council members present. Other Staff now present: Larry Koonce. e 2. 1998/99 POLICY, BUDGET, AND VISION DISCUSSION The City Manager advised the proposed budget for 1998/99 was based on the goals set by Council, The Finance Director reviewed the 1997/98 budget. He reviewed the status of the general fund, the revenue forecast, and the adopted and revised additional revenues and expenditures, He reviewed the history of general fund revenues and expenditures, the unreserved fund balance, taxable value of property, and the revenue from sales tax, He advised the property tax rate has remained constant for the past ten years. Mr. Koonce presented to the Council a preview of the 1998/99 budget. Included in the budget are revenues projected at 23 million dollars, expenditures based on 23 million dollars and service enhancements consisting of 1.2 million dollars. Although the preliminary budget is out of balance 1.2 million dollars, management will be presenting a balanced budget at the July work session. Estimates were given on the general fund tax revenues, sales tax revenues and franchise fees. Council was advised that some departments would be realizing a savings in the current budget and management would like to propose at budget time that non-recurring capital items be financed from the savings. The Mayor suggested that consideration be given to an incentive plan where if a department is able to realize a savings over and above the budget, the savings would be placed into reserves. Then with City Manager approval, a department could request funding during the year for an enhancement from the savings in reserves. e Mayor Scoma asked Staff to also look at the reserve for debt retirement. e e e Work Session Minutes June 30, 1998 Page 3 Mayor Scoma adjourned the work session at 7:45 p.m. APPROVED: Charles Scoma - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary e e e MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - AUGUST 11,1998 -7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order August 11, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Charles Scoma Don Phifer Lyle E. Welch Russell Mitchell Frank Metts, Jr. JoAnn Johnson Cheryl Cowen Lyman Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilman Councilman Council Member Council Member Staff: Larry Cunningham Randy Shiflet Ron Ragland Lisa Daugherty Rex McEntire City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Secretary Attorney Absent: Patricia Hutson City Secretary 2. GN 98-89 - RECORD VOTE ON PROPOSED TAX RATE AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED TAX RATE Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Phifer, to approve GN 98-99 to establish the proposed tax rate of 57¢ and set a public hearing on the tax rate for 7:30 p.m., August 24, 1998. Motion carried 7-0. e e e City Council Minutes August 11, 1998 Page 2 3. GN 98-90 - SETTING DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR 1998/99 CITY BUDGET, PARKS AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND CRIME CONTROL DISTRICT BUDGETS Councilwoman Lyman moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Phifer, to approve GN 98- 90 to set the date for the public hearings on the Crime Control and Prevention District Budget at 6:45 p.m, the Park Development Budget at 7:00 p.m, and the annual City Budget at 7:30 p.m. on August 24, 1998. Motion carried 7-0. 4. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma adjourned the meeting at 7:40 p,m. Charles Scoma - Mayor ATTEST: Lisa Daugherty - Assistant City Secretary e Present: . Absent: MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS HELD IN THE PRE-COUNCIL ROOM AT CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - AUGUST 24, 1998 - 6:00 P.M. Charles Scoma Don Phifer Lyle E. Welch Russell Mitchell Frank Metts, Jr, JoAnn Johnson Cheryl Cowen Lyman Larry Cunningham Randy Shiflet Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Greg Dickens Barry LeBaron Larry Koonce Terry Kinzie John Lynn Thomas Powell Marty Wieder Richard Albin Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilwoman City Manager Deputy City Manager City Secretary Attorney Public Works Director Planning/lnspection Director Finance Director Information Services Director Acting Police Chief Support Services Director Economic Development Director Knowlton English Flowers Matt Milano Ron Ragland Councilman Assistant City Manager ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT CALL TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. DISCUSS ITEMS Agenda Item No.8 - PS 98-28 - GREG D. FROM REGULAR Councilwoman Lyman questioned whether the AUGUST 24 Hightower barricades were going to be AGENDA removed. The Public Works Director advised that they would have to be taken down for Ms. McManus to have access to the end of Hightower. Staff advised that some type of sign would probably need to be put up to make the public aware that they were leaving a public street and entering a drive on private property . e e . e ITEM DISCUSS ITEMS FROM REGULAR AUGUST 24 AGENDA ( Continued) DISCUSSION Mayor Scoma advised there was a revision to the covenant clarifying that if anytime in the future the property is subdivided by the owner or anyone else, they would then be responsible for paying the development costs that have accrued on the property as a result of city improvements, The Council agreed to the revision to the covenant. Pre-Council Minutes August 24,1998 Page 2 ASSIGNMENT Agenda Item No.9 - GN 98-92 - RANDY S. Councilwoman Lyman requested a clarification on the public hearing to be held later in the evening. Councilwoman Lyman asked if the Parks Corporation Budget would not be presented to the Council before the public hearing. Councilwoman Lyman was advised that the Park Facilities Development Board would conduct the public hearing first and then make their recommendation for it to be presented to Council, Councilwoman Lyman questioned the fee schedule in the Golf Course Budget. Councilwoman Lyman questioned why the fee for Resident Twilight Non-Prime ($19.50) was higher than Non-resident Twilight Non-prime ($18,00). The Mayor advised that the City was in the process of reviewing all city fees and any changes that needed to be made would be made at a later time. He further advised that the golf course fee schedule was the same as last year's and that possibly it could be an error. Staff will check on the . .. in f~~~ e . e Pre-Council Minutes August 24,1998 Page 3 ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT DISCUSS ITEMS Agenda Item 6b - Minutes of the Regular PATRICIA H. FROM REGULAR Meeting August 10, 1998 - Councilwoman AUGUST 24 Lyman advised that she was wanting to add to AGENDA Item No, 11 in the minutes, the Council ( continued) discussion concerning the question of whether or not Trinity had forfeited its right to an increase because they had filed 45 days late and the Attorney answered the question by pointing out that the late filing did not constitute a forfeiture. Trinity was simply penalized for late filing. The regular Council minutes are to be corrected to reflect this discussion. Councilman Metts questioned the amendment to the motion, He advised that as he recalled he did not amend his original motion; that there had only been some discussion to clarify his original motion. He advised the minutes should reflect the motion was approved as originally stated. The regular Council minutes are to be corrected by deleting the amended motion and are to reflect that the original motion carried as stated. DISCUSS Mayor Scoma advised that the Council had PATRICIA/LARRY C. ALTERNATE previously decided to meet with the Boards DATE FOR FIRST and Commissions on the first Monday of the MEETING OF month, He advised that the first Monday in BOARDS & September is the Labor Day holiday. The COMMISSIONS Council discussed using the first Pre-Council meeting of the month to discuss the topics & issues to be discussed with the Boards, and then meeting with the Boards later in the month, After discussion, the consensus was to use the first Pre-Council meeting of the month to discuss the agenda for the meeting with the Boards and to meet with the Boards on the first Tuesday after the first Council meeting. The first meeting will be September 15 at 6:00 p.m. with the Planning & Zoning Commission and the Zoning Board of Adjustment. e . e Pre-Council Minutes August 24,1998 Page 4 ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT SPEED LIMIT The City Manager advised the City had RANDY S STUDY FOR received a request asking that the City PRECINCT LINE consider recommending to TxDOT that the ROAD speed limit on Precinct Line Road be increased. The City Manager explained the process for making the request to TxDOT, After discussion by Council, the consensus was not to submit a request to TxDOT to increase the speed limit on Precinct line Road, DISCUSS The City Manager explained that two Council RANDY S. VEHICLE Members had requested that the dealership be PARKING AT FIVE asked to either move the vehicles being STAR FORD parked on the unpaved lot or pave the lot. The City Manager advised that the dealership was parking vehicles on the unpaved lot because they are experiencing an unexpected influx of vehicles for repair, Mr, Pack would like some time to evaluate the work load and his options before making his decision. After discussion by the Council, the consensus was that the City would hold off on notifying Mr. Pack to either move his vehicles or pave the lot. OTHER The Council set Thursday, August 27 at 6:00 NAN INFORMATIONAL p.m, as the date for the Council training of ITEMS laptops. Mayor Scoma advised that Arcadia had requested a briefing with Council on their report on September 3 at 5:00 p,m. at Ernies's Restaurant. Following the briefing, there will be a meeting at 7:00 p.m. at TCJC Northeast in which an overview of the report will be given to numerous individuals from the community, Pre-Council Minutes August 24, 1998 Page 5 . ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma announced at 6:37 p.m. that the Council would adjourn to Executive Session to discuss litigation as authorized by Government Code Section 551,071 and for personnel matters as authorized by Section 551,074 of the Government Code, Charles Scoma - Mayor ATTEST: e Patricia Hutson - City Secretary e e e e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - AUGUST 24, 1998 -7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Scoma called the meeting to order August 24, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Charles Scoma Don Phifer Lyle E. Welch Russell Mitchell Frank Metts, Jr. JoAnn Johnson Cheryl Cowen Lyman Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilman Councilman Council Member Council Member Staff: Larry Cunningham Randy Shiflet Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Greg Dickens City Manager Deputy City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer Absent: Matt Milano Ron Ragland Councilman Assistant City Manager 2. INVOCATION Councilman Welch gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS A. PRESENTATION BY BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION TO CITICABLE "KEEP TEXAS BEAUTIFUL MEDIA 2ND PLACE AWARD" e e e City Council Minutes August 24, 1998 Page 2 Ms. Emily Ward, Beautification Commission Member, advised that North Richland Hills Citicable has been awarded the "Keep Texas Beautiful Media 2nd Place Award". Ms, Ward presented the award to Mr. Greg Oldenburg, Cable TV Coordinator. B. YARD OF THE MONTH AWARDS Mayor Scoma and Ms. Emily Ward, Beautification Commission Member, presented the "Yard of the Month" awards for August to: Jimmy and Pat Clark, 7108 Corona; Eric and Debbie Younkin, 4820 Lariat; Doug and Jeanne Arnold, 7500 Meadow Park North; Herbert and Vivian Ward, 7101 Melissa; Paul and Cheryl Wiest, 7666 Moss Court; and Gregory and Theresa Werking, 7921 Woodland. C. PROCLAMATION - NORTH HILLS HOSPITAL Mayor Scoma recognized North Hills Hospital for its achievements and presented a proclamation to North Hills Hospital proclaiming "North Hills Hospital Day". D. PROCLAMATION - BIRDVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Mayor Scoma recognized Birdville Independent School District for its Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS) test results. Mayor Scoma presented to Fred Wilson, President of BISD School Board, a proclamation proclaiming "Birdville ISD Pride Week", in recognition of the exemplary and recognized status of its schools from the Texas Education Agency. E. CERTIFICATES OF RECOGNITION Green Valley Elementary - Brenda Allen, Principal North Ridge Elementary - Nancy Mull, Principal Holiday Heights Elementary - Donna Solley, Principal Snow Heights Elementary - Suzanne Nickel, Principal Smithfield Elementary - Ann Thompson, 5th grade teacher Alliene Mullendore Elementary - John Fanning, Principal Certificates of recognition were presented to the BISD schools in North Richland Hills and their principals or their representatives for their achievement on the T AAS test results. e e e City Council Minutes August 24, 1998 Page 3 The Mayor announced that the Richland Tennis Center has been awarded "Outstanding Public Tennis Center for 1998" by the U.S. Tennis Association. The award will be presented in September in New York. COUNCILMAN MITCHELL LEFT THE COUNCIL MEETING DUE TO ILLNESS. A video was presented on Texas Schools "To Tell the Story", and a second video was presented that consisted of a collage of Birdville Independent School District videos from the past year. 5. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA None. 6. CONSENTAGENDAITEM(~ APPROVED A. MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 10,1998 B. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 10,1998 C. GN 98-91 - CHANGE DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT D. PU 98-52 - APPROVE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH MANSFIELD ISD FOR PURCHASING CONTRACT - RESOLUTION NO. 98-35 E. PU 98-53 - CONTRACT WITH TARRANT COUNTY FOR COLLECTION OF CITY PROPERTY TAXES - RESOLUTION NO. 98-36 Councilwoman Lyman moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Phifer, to approve the Consent Agenda, with the correction of the Regular August 10 City Council Minutes as discussed in Pre-Council. Corrections are: 1) Item No. 11, the addition of discussion: "The Council discussed the question of whether or not Trinity had forfeited its right to any increase because they had filed 45 days late. Mr. McEntire answered the question by pointing out that the late filing did not constitute a forfeiture. Trinity was simply penalized for late filing." 2) Delete the amended motion and reflect the original motion carried as stated. Motion carried 5-0. City Council Minutes August 24, 1998 Page 4 e 7. PZ 98-34 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF FRED BALLINGER FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM AG-AGRICUL TURAL TO R1S-SPECIAL RESIDENTIAL ON TRACT 4B, J.B. EDENS SURVEY, A-499 (LOCATED AT 8750 HIGHTOWER DRIVE) ORDINANCE NO. 2325 APPROVED Mayor Scoma opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor to please come forward. Mr. Fred Ballinger, applicant and the agent representing the owner, Ms. Lisa McManus, appeared before the Council and spoke in favor of the request. Mayor Scoma called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to the request to come forward. e There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Pro Tern Phifer moved, seconded by Councilwoman Lyman, to approve Ordinance No. 2325 to rezone the property from Agricultural to R1 S Special Single Family Residential. Motion carried 5-0. 8. PS 98-28 - REQUEST OF FRED BALLINGER FOR A FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 17, STONY BROOKE ADDITION (LOCATED AT 8750 HIGHTOWER DRIVE) APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Phifer moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve PS 98- 28 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and with the following paragraph inserted into the standard NRH covenant documents regarding this property: "5. In the event that Lot 1, Block 17, Stonybrooke Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, is developed by building one single family residence at the time the City installs Hightower Drive then, in such event, these covenants shall be null and void and the costs of street, drainage, sidewalks and utility e extensions will be collected from the owner of the property pursuant to the assessment City Council Minutes August 24, 1998 Page 5 e programs for those improvements which are in effect at the time Hightower Drive is built by the City. If, however, no single family residence has been built by that time, or if the property is sold by that time, or if the property is ever subdivided, then these covenants to pay for those improvements will be in full force and effect. In the event the covenant is revived by the subdivision of the property, the development costs for the owner shall be based upon the actual cost of the improvements if they have been constructed; if they have not been constructed, the development costs shall be based upon the cost of the improvements as estimated by the City staff at the time of the application for platting to make the subdivision effective." Motion carried 5-0. 9. GN 98-92 - PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED 1998-99 BUDGET A video was presented highlighting the 1997/98 budget activities. Ron Ragland, Assistant City Manager, now present at 8:40 p.m. e Mr, Koonce, Finance Director, presented the highlights of the 1998/99 budget. Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Phifer, to accept the proposed 1998-99 budget for both operations and capital projects and direct staff to prepare the Ordinance for adoption. Mayor Scoma opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the Public Hearing. Motion carried 5-0. 10. GN 98-93 - PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED TAX RATE FOR 1998-99 FISCAL YEAR Mr. Koonce presented a recap of the City's tax rate. The 57¢ tax rate is to be maintained for the sixth consecutive year. Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to approve GN 98-93, directing staff to place an ordinance on the September 14 City Council Agenda to adopt e a tax rate of 57¢ for fiscal year 1998-99. City Council Minutes August 24, 1998 Page 6 e Mayor Scoma opened the Public Hearing and closed for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Scoma closed the Public Hearing. Motion carried 5-0. 11. GN 98-94 - APPOINTMENTS TO LAND USE AD HOC COMMITTEE APPROVED Mayor Scoma advised that the mission statement of the Land Use Ad Hoc Committee is: "To review and evaluate the city's current land uses in regards to zoning and subdivision regulations, as well as landscaping, thoroughfare planning and sign ordinances for the purpose of enhancing the image and quality of future residential and business development." e The objectives are: 1. Develop a process for reviewing the current Zoning and Subdivision Regulations, Thoroughfare Master Plan and Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 2. Identify desirable landscaping and signage concepts to enhance the attractiveness of our city and protect neighborhoods and adjacent properties. 3. Explore options used by other cities. 4. Conduct meetings as needed with businesses, neighborhoods, boards and commissions to seek input and ideas. 5. Provide a liaison with Planning and Zoning Commission, Zoning Board of Appeals, and Parks and Recreation Board as needed to insure communication, coordination and input. 6. Establish recommendation for modifications to the current regulations and ordinances if needed. 7. Report its recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Recommended for appointment to the Land Use Ad Hoc Committee are: Gary Anderson, Randy Brock, Robert Curry, Sandra Durbin, Leslie Jauregui, Richard Kilgore, Arthur Mcilwain, Mark Nyland, Robert O'Reilly, Mark Ostendorp, Ph.D., Mrs. Pat Roberts, Cindy Seale, Joe Tolbert, Peggy Weatherred, Timothy Welch and Dale Whisenant. Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Phifer, to pass GN 98-94 establishing the Land Use Ad Hoc Committee. e City Council Minutes August 24, 1998 Page 7 e Councilman Metts asked if there was a life span for these committees. The Mayor advised there was not a stated life space. The ad hoc designation is a specific purpose committee. The Land Use Ad Hoc Committee will probably complete its work by January or February of 1999. The committee will submit its recommendation at that time to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council and the life of the committee will expire. Motion carried 4-1; Mayor Pro Tem Phifer, Councilwoman Johnson, Councilmen Welch and Metts voting for and Councilwoman Lyman voting against. City Manager Cunningham stated that he would like to clarify for the record, that when the Council approves the appointments to each of the ad hoc committees, they are also approving the adoption of the mission statement and the objectives for each of the committees. The Council agreed that this was correct. e 12. GN 98-95 - APPOINTMENTS TO CODE ENFORCEMENT AD HOC COMMITTEE APPROVED Mayor Scoma advised the mission statement of the Code Enforcement Ad Hoc Committee is: "To review and evaluate the City's current "Code of Ordinances" and philosophies used to enforce the codes related to the health, safety and protection of public, residential and commercial investments. And. provide visionary recommendations to aid the City Council as it works to develop an increasingly dynamic community." The objectives of the committee are: 1. Review current codes, policies, and enforcement programs related to the health, safety and protection of public, residential and commercial investments. 2. Identify problems and concerns. 3. Work with homeowners associations and other community groups to define the code enforcement philosophy for NRH. 4. Report findings, conclusions and any recommendations to aid the City Council in its efforts to attain the desired goals. Recommended for appointment to the Code Enforcement Ad Hoc Committee are: Mike Benton, Glenna Crocker, Janice Davis, Marjorie Nash Dodd, Nancy Dowler, e Michael Hailey, Steve Hambrick, Thomas Hodge, Ann McCord, Jerry Nolan, Barbara City Council Minutes August 24, 1998 Page 8 e O'Reilly, Dr. Evonne Rogers, Robert Vann, T.W. Wheelock, Andrew Wolff, and Kenneth Zuver. Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to pass GN 98-95 establishing the Code Enforcement Ad Hoc Committee. Councilwoman Lyman advised she was voting against the appointments because she was uncomfortable with receiving information at the last minute and being asked to vote on it. She advised that she was not against the people being appointed. Motion carried 4-1; Mayor Pro Tem Phifer, Councilwoman Johnson, Councilmen Welch and Metts voting for and Councilwoman Lyman voting against. 13. GN 98-96 - APPOINTMENTS TO CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL AD HOC COMMITTEE APPROVED e Mayor Scoma advised that the mission of the Cultural and Educational Ad Hoc Committee is: "To review and evaluate the city and community's cultural and continued and business educational services and programs being offered, and make recommendations for new programs to benefit the citizens of North Richland Hills. n The objectives of the committee are: 1, Review current programs offered by the city and community to met the cultural and educational (continuing and business) needs of the residential and commercial citizens of North Richland Hills. 2. Evaluate the potential of joint educational (continuing and business) programs with the Birdville Independent School District and Tarrant County Junior College. 3. Evaluate the potential of fine arts and performing arts programs for the citizens of NRH. 4. Evaluate the city's current facilities and technologies for use in potential cultural and educational programs, and make recommendation for future facilities. 5. Develop recommendations for funding cultural and continuing and business educational programs offered or sponsored by the city. 6. Report findings, conclusions and any recommendations to aid the City Council in its efforts to attain the desired goals. e Recommended to the Cultural and Educational Ad Hoc Committee are: Chris Bolton, L. Michele DeLaRosa, Zanda Hilger-Seaberg, Steve Ingham, Stan Johansen, Lorinda Lawson, Kevin Leckey, John Lewis, Monte Neece, John J. Pempsell, Wynonia Ruffin, Chuck Shive, Lewis Sommermeyer, Renea Stasaski, Stacie Stokes and Donna Stump. City Council Minutes August 24, 1998 Page 9 e Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilwoman Lyman, to deny GN 98-96 on the basis that there are not the qualified people on the committee that there are on the other communities. Mayor Pro Tem Phifer advised he felt it was a very good diversified representation from both the educational and cultural. He felt the committee did not represent one cultural or educational need. He felt the appointees to the committee represented the mission statement and objectives that have been set out for them. After discussion, motion failed 3-2; Mayor Pro Tem Phifer and Councilmen Welch and Metts voting against and Councilwomen Johnson and Lyman voting for. Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to approve GN 98-96, establishing the Cultural and Educational Ad Hoc Committee. Councilman Metts requested clarification on the life span of the committees. The Mayor stated that this committee has been advised that it is hoped that their work could be completed by the end of the year; and that they could be prepared to give the Council a recommendation. They will report directly back to the Council, as will the Code Enforcement Ad Hoc Committee. He advised that it was felt that the Ad Hoc e Committee for Code Enforcement could also have their work done by the end of the year. Motion carried 3-2; Mayor Pro Tem Phifer and Councilmen Welch and Metts voting for and Councilwomen Johnson and Lyman voting against. 14. GN 98-97 - ADOPTING COUNCIL GOALS - RESOLUTION NO. 98-37 APPROVED Councilwoman Lyman moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve Resolution No. 98-37 establishing the vision statement and goals for the City of North Richland Hills. Motion carried 5-0. 15. PU 98-54 - REJECT BID FOR ANNUAL CONTRACT TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC SUPPLY MATERIALS APPROVED e e e e City Council Minutes August 24, 1998 Page 10 Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilwoman Lyman, to approve PU 98-54 rejecting the bid submitted by Roadrunner Traffic Supply for the Traffic Material contract and authorize staff to rebid the contract. Motion carried 5-0. 16. (A) CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mr. Kim Kulger, North Richland Hills resident, appeared before the Council. Mr. Kulger expressed concerns about several prominent department leaders leaving the City during the past year. He requested that the Council publish a report with answers to the following questions: 1) Has the city tried to persuade these men from leaving their positions or at least hold their positions until they can be filled again? 2) Was the City unaware of the intent of each of these men and if so why? 3) What is there going to be done to resolve the problem of such prominent men leaving? Ms. Jan Andrews, 7101 Meadow Park North, appeared before the Council. Ms. Andrews advised she was the wife of Fire Lieutenant Don Andrews who recently retired from the City. Ms. Andrews expressed her concerns regarding the circumstances with which her husband retired from the city, and the morale of the city employees, The Mayor advised he would like to make a comment that was not necessarily in rebuttal nor a response to these particular issues When an individual approaches the City Manager or a supervisor and presents a letter of resignation, it is in the discretion of that supervisor or City Manager to make a decision. The City Council has put confidence and trust in the City Manager to manage this City and the City Manager is expected to make decisions that will not only maintain the high morale of department but will require performance and diligence on behalf of all citizens and employees. (B) INFORMATION AND REPORTS None. e e e City Council Minutes August 24, 1998 Page 11 17. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Scoma adjourned the meeting at 9:31 p.m. ATTEST: Charles Scoma - Mayor Patricia Hutson - City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS _ Department: City Secretary Subject: Appointment of Assistant City Secretary - Resolution No. 98-41 e -- Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 Agenda Number: GN 98-98 The position of Assistant City Secretary is currently vacant. The City Charter states that the Mayor appoints the Assistant City Secretary with approval of two-thirds majority of the City Council. The City Secretary has recommended to the Mayor that Ms. Alicia Richardson be appointed as Assistant City Secretary. The Mayor has agreed to the City Secretary's recommendation and has appointed Ms. Alicia Richardson to the position. Resolution No. 98-41 approves the Mayor's appointment. Recommendation: To pass Resolution No. 98-41 appointing Ms. Alicia Richardson as Assistant City Secretary effective September 14, 1998. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director Øawðtå ~ Department Head Signature - e e Resolution No. 98-41 WHEREAS, the City Secretary has recommended appointment of Alicia Richardson to fill the vacancy in the office of Assistant City Secretary; and WHEREAS, the Mayor has followed such recommendation and appointed Alicia Richardson as Assistant City Secretary; and WHEREAS, the name of Alicia Richardson has been submitted to the City Council for approval of the Mayor's appointment, pursuant to Article VI, Section 5 of the Charter. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; that The Mayor's appointment of Alicia Richardson as Assistant City Secretary is duly approved. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 14th DAY OF September 1998 by a vote of for and against. Approved: Charles Scoma, Mayor Attest: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary Approved as to Form and Legality: Rex McEntire City Attorney CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 Subject: Appointment to Place 4 on Teen Court Advisory Board Agenda Number: GN 98-99 Ms. Lynne Simpson has resigned from Place 4 on the Teen Court Advisory Board. Councilwoman Johnson is recommending that Ms, Luci Wolfe be appointed to Place 4 to fill the unexpired term of Ms, Simpson. Recommendation: To appoint Ms, Luci Wolfe to Place 4 on the Teen Court Advisory Board, term expiring June 30, 2000. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available G7~tY~~ Department Head Signature Finance Director ~~ (;; ity Manag r ignature CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS "~ Department Subject: Police DepartmenULegal Interlocal Agreement on Juveniles with Tarrant County Resolution No. 98-38 Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 Agenda Number: GN 98-105 Tarrant County provides fingerprinting and other services required by Chapter 58 of the Family Code. The County accepts this responsibility and liability for these records. Our share of the cost for one year is $4,942.11. These services are to be furnished pursuant to the subject Interlocal Agreement. The County requires that we have a written agreement. If we do not use these County Juvenile Department services, the Police Department would be forced to alter the jail facilities for juvenile fingerprinting. The City would be required to maintain the permanent juvenile fingerprint and photograph records and assume the liability that goes with maintenance and release of juvenile records. Our cost would be far in excess of $4,942.11. Passage of Resolution No. 98-38 authorizes the City Manager to execute the Agreement. Recommendation: Pass Resolution No. 98-38 authorizing the City Manager to execute the Interlocal Agreement. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ e Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION AIIIIIICII Director Page 1 of e e e RESOLUTION NO, 98-38 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The City Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute the attached Interlocal Agreement Relating to the Processing of Juvenile Offenders with Tarrant County. His act in executing said Interlocal Agreement shall be deemed to be the act and deed of the City. PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of September, 1998. APPROVED: Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, City Attorney e e e THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE PROCESSING OF JUVENILE OFFENDERS THIS INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this _ day of , 1998, by and between the CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, a municipal corporation located in Tarrant County, Texas (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), and TARRANT COUNTY (hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY"). WITN ESS ETH: WHEREAS, the Texas State Legislature has authorized the formulation of interlocal cooperation agreements between and among governmental entities; and WHEREAS, this Interlocal Agreement is made under the authority granted by and pursuant to V,T,C.A, Government Code, Chapter 791, known as the Interlocal Cooperation Act; and WHEREAS, CITY desires services relating to the processing ófjuvenile offenders; and WHEREAS, COUNTY is capable of providing such services, and WHEREAS, the governing bodies of each entity find that the project or undertaking is necessary for the benefit of the public and that each party has legal authority to provide the governmental function which is the subject matter of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the governing bodies further find that the performance of this Agreement is in the common interest of both parties; and WHEREAS, the governing bodies, in paying for the performance of governmental functions or in performing such governmental functions, shall make payments therefore, if any, only from current revenues legally available to such party; NOW THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual agreements contained herein, the parties do hereby agree as follows: I, nmn This agreement shall commence on the date first written above and continue for a period of one (1) year unless terminated in accordance with its terms. Thereafter, this Agreement may be renewed for additional one (1) year periods upon the mutual consent of the parties, 1 e e e -- II. Responsibilities of County A COUNTY shall process and handle all juveniles presented by CITY at the Scott D, Moore Juvenile Justice Center (2701 Kimbo Road, Fort Worth, Texas 76111) in accordance with the requirements of V,T.C.A, Family Code Chapter 58. Any and all requirements imposed by V.T.C,A Family Code Chapter 58 on CITY shall be performed by COUNTY on behalf of the CITY. These requirements shall include, büt not limited to, photographs and fingerprints of children, sealing of records, destruction of records, collection of information and reporting. B. COUNTY shall also enter any and all fingerprints acquired in performing services in accordance with this Agreement into the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) through the Fort Worth Police Department. C. Further, COUNTY shall allow CITY access to any and all information and records obtained in performing services in accordance With this Agreement. Hereafter, the responsibilities described in Paragraphs A, B., and C. above shall be collectively referred to as the "services," III. Responsibilities of City CITY shall pay a total of Four Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Two and 11/100 Dollars ($4,942,11) to COUNTY in consideration of COUNTY's performance of the services, Payment to the COUNTY shall be made in one installment due and payable on September 30,1998. CITY will not be required to make any payments to COUNTY when COUNTY is in default under this Agreement, nor shall this paragraph constitute a waiver of any right, at law or in equity, which CITY may have if COUNTY is in default, including the right to bring legal adion for damages or for specific performance of this Contract. Waiver of any default under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent default. IV, Waiver of Immunity It is expressly understood and agreed that in the execution of this Agreement, neither CITY nor COUNTY waives, nor shall be deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising in the exercise of governmental powers and functions, 2 e V. Independent Contractor COUNTY covenants and agrees that it is an independent contractor and not an officer, agent, servant or employee of CITY; that COUNTY shall have exclusive control of an exclusive right to control the details of the work performed hereunder and all persons performing same, and shall be responsible for the acts and omissions of its officers, agents, employees, contractors, subcontractors and consultants; that the- doctrine of the respondeat superior shall not apply as between CITY and COUNTY, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, subcontractors and consultants, and nothing herein shall be construed as creating a partnership or joint enterprise between CITY and COUNTY, VI. County Property CITY shall in no way nor under any circumstances be responsible for any property belonging to COUNTY, its officers, members, agents, employees, subcontractors, licensees, or invitees, which may be lost, stolen, destroyed or in any way damaged. VII. County Liability e COUNTY hereby assumes all liability and responsibility of the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees for any and all claims or suits for property loss or damage and/or personal injury, including death to any and all persons, of whatever kind or character, whether real or asserted, arising out of or in connection with the execution, performance, attempted performance or non-performance of this Agreement and/or the operations, activities and services described herein. Except as provided above, COUNTY shall not be responsible for any property belonging to CITY, its officers, members, agents, employees, subcontractors, licensees, or invitees, which may be lost, stolen, destroyed or in any way damaged, VIII, Default If either party hereto shall default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, such defaulting party shall have thirty (30) days after delivery to such defaulting party of written notice of such default within which to cure such default. IX. Termination Either party may, at its option, with or without cause, and without prejudice to any remedy e it may be entitled at law or in equity or otherwise under this Agreement, terminate this 3 e e e Agreement in whole or in part, without penalty or liability, by giving at least sixty (60) days written notice to the other party. X. No other Obligations By entering into this Agreement. the parties do not create any obligations, express or implied, other than those set forth herein. and this Agreement shall not create any rights in parties not signatories hereto. - XI. Successors and Assigns Both COUNTY and CITY each bind themselves, their successors. executors and assigns to the other party to this Agreement. Neither COUNTY nor CITY will assign. sublet, subcontract or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other party, No assignment, delegation of duties or subcontract under this Agreement will be effective without the prior written consent of the other party, XII. Venue The parties to this Agreement agree and covenant that this Agreement will be enforceable in Tarrant County, Texas; and that if legal action is necessary to enforce this Agreement, exclusive venue will lie in Tarrant County, Texas. XIII, Remedies No right or remedy granted herein or reserved to the parties is exclusive of any other right or remedy herein by law or equity provided or permitted. but each shall be cumulative of every other right or remedy given hereunder. No covenant or condition to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. XIV. Severability If any of the terms, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses. phrases, provIsions, covenants, conditions or any other part of this Agreement are for any reason held to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the term, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, provisions, covenants, conditions or any other part of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated. 4 e e e XV, Applicable Law This Agreement is entered into subject to the City Charters and Ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills as they may be amended from time to time and is subject to and is to be construed, governed and enforced under all applicable laws of State of Texas and Federal law. Situs of this Agreement is agreed to be Tarrant County, Texas, for all purposes including performance and execution,' XVI. Entire Agreement This Agreement embodies the complete agreement of the parties hereto, superseding all oral or written previous and contemporary agreements between the parties relating to matters herein; and except as otherwise provided herein, cannot be modified without written agreement of the parties. XVII. Non-Waiver It is further agreed that one or more instances of forbearance by CITY or COUNTY in the exercise of its rights herein, shall in no way constitute a waiver thereof, XVIII. Authorization The undersigned officers and/or agents are properly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolutions extending such authority have been duly passed and are now in full force and effect. TARRANT COUNTY By: Tom Vandergriff, County Judge ATTEST: By: Court Clerk 5 e e e APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Assistant District Attorney ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Rex McEntire, City Attorney CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS By: Larry Cunningham, City Manager 6 e e e STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TARRANT § TARRANT COUNTY Acknowledgment BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared TOM VANDERGIRFF, know to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed same for and as the act and deed of TARRANT COUNTY, and as CountY" Judge thereof, and for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated, GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the _ day of ,1998. Notary Public, State of Texas My Commission expires: STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TARRANT § CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Acknowledgment BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared LARRY CUNNINGHAM, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed same for and as the act and deed of the CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, a municipal corporation of Tarrant County, Texas, and as City Manager thereof, and for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the _ day of ,1998, Notary Public, State of Texas My Commission expires: 7 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Department: Subject: Human Resources 9/14/98 Council Meeting Date: Approve Exemption of City's Health Plan from HIPAA Agenda Number: GN 98-107 RC4UiJ t:r r It:r It:s The federal government passed the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in 1996; this law mandates certain requirements for health insurance plans, The City meets the requirements of many of these mandates such as mental health parity, health status nondiscrimination, and length of stay requirements for mothers and newborns. However, the City does not meet requirements for portions of the preexisting condition limitation or all notices required under the Act. As a self-funded non-federal governmental health plan, the City may elect to exempt itself from the requirements of this legislation. In 1997 the City Council voted to exempt the City Health Plan from these requ.i,rements. The City's options are to continue exempting itself from the HIPAA requirements or to allow the City's health plan to become subject to HIPAA. The advantages of exempting out of HIPAA are savings in administrativê costs and exposure to further federal regulation of our plan. Exempting the health plan from this legislation does not preclude the City from adopting any or aU of the requirements in the future. Electing to exempt the plan from these requirements enables the City to maintain optimal flexibility in managing the plan. The health plan will be reviewed and evaluated this upcoming year. During this review, any of the HIPAA requirements we currently do not comply with could be considered for enclusion. This election is required on an annual basis in conjunction with the plan year, Recommendation: To exempt the health plan from the HIPAA requirements for the plan year October 1, 1998 to Septembe 30, 1999. . Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ ther Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available nature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ) FI......,. Dlrlctor Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 Subject: Revision of School Zone Hours at Carrie Francis Thomas Elementary School - Ordinance No. 2326 Agenda Number: GN 98-111 At the request of the Birdville Independent School District (BISD), the school zone hours for dismissal at the elementary schools were changed with the approval of Ordinance No. 2319 on July 27, 1998. However, BISD failed to notify staff that they did not include the Pre-Kindergarten dismissal time at Carrie Francis Elementary School in their original request. They are now requesting that the Pre-Kindergarten dismissal time be added. The Public Works Department is requesting the noon dismissal hours from 11 :00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. be included for this elementary school site. Recommendation: To approve Ordinance No. 2326. I t Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaDle Finance Director Page 1 of - . Bob E, Griggs, EdD, Superintendent . . BISD ,RECEIYED ./L',;2 4 1998 Birdville Independent School District 6125 East Belknap. Haltom City, Texas 76117·817-831·5700. Fax 817·838-7261. http://www,birdville,kI2.tx.us It is... August 17, 1998 Will it help teachers and students? If not...reconsider! Mr. Larry Cunningham Ci ty Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Dear Mr. Cunningham: Let me take this opportunity to express my thanks for your response in sending Ordinance #2319 for school zones for Birdville schools within your city. It appears that I may have incorrectly identified the Academy at Carrie Francis Thomas as needing only two times a day for school zone, since they do now have an all day kindergarten. They also have a half day Pre-Kindergarten for four year olds. Please consider adding a third time a day to their school for 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Please accept my thanks for your support and the opportunity to work together. Sincerely, ~ ¿ p2ú4~ Ray E~illiams, Ed.D. Associate Superintendent for Administrative Services c: Bob E. Griggs ORDINANCE NO. 2326 · AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2319 AS IT AFFECTS THE SCHOOL ZONE AT THE CARRIE FRANCIS THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL; ESTABLISHING A PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 20 MILES PER HOUR; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF A FINE NOT IN EXCESS OF $200.00 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. That portion of Section 3.05 of Ordinance No. 722 dealing with the speed zone at the Carrie Francis Thomas Elementary School is amended as follows: · Upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation heretofore made as authorized by the provisions of Section 169, Article 6701d, V.T.C.S., the Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on highways, the prima facie speed limits hereinafter indicated for vehicles are hereby determined and declared to be reasonable and safe, and such speed limits are hereby fixed for vehicles traveling upon the following named streets and highways, or parts thereof during the hereinafter designed hours, either (1) when such hours are described on official school speed limit signs located as said zones; or (2) when school zone signs bearing a flashing amber light and located at said zones are in operation. The location of said school zones and hours during which said speed zones shall be in effect are as follows, to-wit: The prima facie speed limit on the following streets between the hours shown below, shall be 20 miles per hour: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ZONES - Three Times Daily 7:30 A.M. - 8:30 A.M. 11:00 A.M. -12:30 P.M. 2:15 P.M. - 3:45 P.M. Carrie Francis Thomas Elementary 8000-8300 Emerald Hills Way 5600 Cork Lane 5600 Newman Drive 8100-8200 O'Brian Way 5500 Finian Lane The remainder of said Section 3.05 remains the same, as shown in Ordinance No. 2319. 2. Any person violating any portion of this ordinance shall be subject to a fine not in excess · of $200.00. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law. . .' . PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 14th day of September, 1998. APPROVED: Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .1 Department: Environmental Services Council Meeting Date: 09/14/98 Subject: Amend Interlocal Agreement for Use of Environmental Agenda Number: ~N ç¡S-110 Collection Center - Resolution No. 98-45 The current Interlocal Agreement for use of the Fort Worth Environmental Collection Center (ECC) expires on September 30, 1998. To prevent interruption of services for our citizens to use the ECC, the City of Fort Worth has provided an amendment to extend the current Interlocal Agreement through December 31, 1998 with no proposed changes. The ECC is operated by the City of Fort Worth as a regional collection center for household hazardous waste with funding provided by a pass through grant from TNRCC and NCTCOG. The ECC accepts household cleaners, pesticides, herbicides, paint and paint products, oil, aerosols, solvents, auto fluids, photo chemicals, swimming pool chemicals, batteries, acids and fluorescent light bulbs. NRH citizens are permitted to take their household products to the ECC under the current Interlocal Agreement. The City is billed at $75.00 per household each quarter and to date 61 residents have visited the ECC. In addition to the ECC, the "Crud Cruiser," mobile collection unit, which was purchased through a pass through grant from TNRCC and NCTCOG, is ready to hit the streets. The Crud Cruiser, which we share with the cities of Hurst, Haltom City, Watauga, Richland Hills, Grapevine, Colleyville, and Tarrant County, will allow for local collection events in different locations of the City through out the year to make getting rid of these hazardous chemicals even easier and more convenient for the citizens of North Richland Hills. Recommendation: To approve Resolution # 98-45 to authorize the City Manager to sign the Interlocal Agreement Amendment with the City of Forth Worth for use of the Environmental Collection Center through December 31,1998. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available :5/ ð-~~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION M Page 1 of FIn8n.. DhcIor RESOLUTION No, 98-45 e Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1, The City Manager be, and is hereby authorized to execute the attached Interlocal Agreement Amendment with the City of Fort Worth for use of the Environmental Collection Center through December 31, 1998. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 14the day of September, 1998 Charles Scoma - Mayor ATTEST: e Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City e · THE STATE OF TEXAS § § § COUNTIES OF TARRANT AND DENTON § KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS Amendment I to City Secretary Contract No. 23373 The Interlocal Agreement Between the City of Fort Worth and the City of North Richland Hills THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the City of Fort Worth, a home-rule municipality located in Tarrant and Denton Counties, Texas, ("Fort Worth"), acting by and through Charles Boswell, its duly authorized Assistant City Manager, and the City of North Richland Hills, a home-rule municipality located in Tarrant County, Texas ("North Richland Hills"), acting by and through , its duly authorized WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Fort Worth and North Richland Hills have previously entered into an Interlocal Agreement, known as City Secretary Contract No. 23373, concerning the e household hazardous waste program operated by Fort Worth; and WHEREAS, the initial term of that agreement will expire on September 30, 1998, and both cities agree that it is necessary to extend the term of the agreement to accommodate the citizens of North Richland Hills while the terms of next year's agreement are determined; NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: Section 1. The contract is hereby amended to change the expiration date of the term of the agre~ment to December 31, 1998. Section 2. Unless amended herein, all other provisions of the original interlocal agreement remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement in triplicate in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. e - 1 - ACCEPTED: City of North Richland Hills BY: NAME: TITLE: DATE: ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney -2- ACCEPTED: City of Fort Worth BY: Charles Boswell, Asst. City Manager DATE: ATTEST: Gloria Pearson, City Secretary Reference M&C APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Marcia Wise, Assistant City Attorney e e e ,'. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Î . Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 09/14/98 Subject: Contract Authorizing Pass-Through State Grant Agreement for NETS Agenda Number: GN 98-112 A contract proposal between the City of North Richland Hills and the Texas Department of Transportation has been received providing for the continuation of funding for the Northeast Transportation Service (NETS), The City is acting as a pass-through conduit for the funds, No City funding is required to administer the contract. NETS provides transportation services to the elderly and disabled in many cities in northeast Tarrant County. The primary focus of the service is for employment and medical needs, A Federal grant which helped fund NETS has not been continued for next year, NETS is working with the cities in the area to address this shortfall. This years' contract, which is for state funding, provides for a reduced amount of $78,697, The amount has been reduced because of the elimination of the Federal grant, which the State was matching. The contract becomes effective when executed and ends on August 31,1999. This contract does not effect the City's budgeted participation in NETS. Recommendation That the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available FlnMce ~ ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION Page 1 of . . -- State and 1.0,·al Small Urban Public: Tran.f ulrlation Grant Agreement: TxDOT a." Redpient Attachment B Approved Projed Budget Effecth'e Date: September 1, 1998 Project Completion Date: August 31,1999 Recil)ient: NORTH RICHLAND HILLS - NETS State Contract Number: 51902FI014 State Project Number: URB 9902(02) FT A Grant Number: Apportionment Year: FFY 19981SFY 1999 Category ALl Code Description Total stau Local Capital $0, no $O.O(} $0.00 11.7A.OO Preventive Maintenance $67.697.00 $()7.697.0() $0.00 $O,O() $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $67.697.00 $67.697.00 $0. on Planning 41.12.00 Gen. Developmentl $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Comprehensive Planning -- Operating 30.09.00 Operating Assitance $256.398.00 $11.000.00 $245.398.00 Subtotals $324.095.00 $78.697.00 $245.398.00 Scbolanhip 41.17.00 Training $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 43.50.02 Technical Assistance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 43.50.03 Transit Research $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 43.50.04 Related Support Services $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Project Totals 5324,095.00 578,697.00 5245,398.00 Maximum Reimburseable Amount: 578,697.00 e Page I of I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS : - Police Department: Subject: Approval of Purchase of Armored Vehicle 09/14/98 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PU 98-55 The Police Department has obtained an armored vehicle, called the "Peacekeeper", which has been received from the General Services Commission Federal Surplus Property Program, This vehicle is the only armored vehicle that we are aware of in Tarrant County that can be used in high-risk situations involving potential life and death scenarios. These situations are consistent with our Tactical Unit operations and the vehicle that was evaluated can be used to extract citizens or officers who have been shot should such events occur. During these days and times, we have seen too many incidents where schools or shopping areas have become targets for armed belligerents who hold innocent citizens or children hostage. The concern of the Police Department, since Haltom City Officer Gary Hires was murdered by a sniper in 1993, is that no vehicle existed to handle these situations. Since the Haltom City event in 1993, our agency has responded to at least five situations involving high-powered rifles or military equipment by suspects being arrested by our Tactical Unit. It is virtually impossible to extract injured people or insert officers into high-risk areas in a safe manner. This vehicle and its armor give us that ability. The vehicle has been evaluated since August 24, 1998 by the City's Equipment Services personnel as well as personnel from the Police Department and has been deemed worthy of purchase. It concludes a five-year hunt for such a vehicle to be purchased by our agency. The purchase price of the vehicle is $20,000 and approximately $8,000 additional money will be needed to complete the painting and equipping of the vehicle. All of the funds to be expended are to be taken from the Police Department Seized Funds Account. Recommendation: Approve the purchase of the armored vehicle and authorize the City Manager to sign any related legal documents pertaining to said purchase. Finance Review Acct. Number 115-8010.531. 74-10 Sufficient Funds Available nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION Finance Director Page 1 of £rtment CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning & Inspections Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 SubjectPUblic Hearing to Consider the Request of Nextel Corporation Agenda Number: PZ 98-32 For a Special Use Permit to allow a Communications Tower On a Portion of Lot 15A, Edgley Addition. (Located in the 7500 Block of Grapevine Highway) Ordinance No. 2330 Joanne Desjardins is the agent representing Nextel Communications in this Special Use Permit Request. Nextel is proposing to construct a 75-foot communications tower near Grapevine Highway on property occupied by North Hills Tire and Wheel. The property is currently zoned C2-Commercial and is owned by Mr. Wayne Herndon. Please see attached zoning exhibit for information on zoning of surrounding properties. The cellular tower will be located on the northern portion of Lot 15A. The Zoning Ordinance requires a Special Use Permit for communication towers that are more than 65 feet in height. The applicant is also proposing construction of a 200 square foot equipment building. The issues associated with this Special Use Permit are as follows: 1. Site Plan: A site plan for the proposed development has been submitted. The site plan indicates the location of the cell tower and the equipment building. The proposed cell tower is located behind the building occupied by North Hills Wheel and Tire; adjacent to the North Hills Mall property. Landscaping: The site plan submitted does not indicate any landscaping; however, after an onsite inspection, staff feels that landscaping the cell tower site would accomplish nothing in terms of aesthetics or beautification since the tower site is behind an existing building. 3. Fencing: The site plan indicates an existing 6-foot tall chain link fence surrounds the cell tower site. 4. Equipment Building: The proposed 200 square foot equipment building exceeds the maximum of 100 square feet allowed by the NRH regulations. The equipment building is proposed to have an exposed aggregate exterior surface, which complies with the masonry requirements. Even though the size of the proposed building exceeds that allowed by the NRH regulations, this was not an issue during the review by the Planning & Zoning Commission, since the building would not be visible from Grapevine Highway. 5. Co-location: The developer has provided information relative to co-location on existing towers in the vicinity. No tower in the area has sufficient capability to accommodate Nextel's communication needs. Nextel has provided a letter indicating their willingness to accommodate other comm1lnication pro\liders Finance Review Source of Funds: , Bonds (GO/Rev.) \ Operating Budget _ .ther L- 'BJepa~~îC s;gnat~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance' Direct'; Page 1 of 6. Failure characteristics: The tower the applicant is proposing is 75 feet tall. If this tower fails there is a possibility that the tower may damage adjoining structures and the TU Electric transmission lines. 7. FAA Certification: The applicant has provided information relative to FAA approval of this cell tower location. 8. Existing tower locations: The applicant has provided a map that shows the approximate location and distance to existing tower locations. This map is attached. Staff has also provided a map showing all cell towers in North Richland Hills. The NRH cellular regulations require a minimum of 1,250 feet separation distance between a cellular tower over 65' in height and another tower of less than 65' in height. There is an existing cellular antenna on top of an existing steel TU electrical tower nearby. However, cellular antennae on alternate structures, such as an electrical transmission tower, are exempt from the minimum spacing requirement. The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this Special Use Permit request at it's August 13, 1998 meeting and recommended denial because: 1) if the tower were to fail, it would fall out of their own property boundaries; and 2) there is an existing cellular antenna on a nearby TU transmission tower. The applicant provided a letter requesting that the City Council consider this Special Use ermit request for a cellular tower. A three-fourths vote by the City Council is not required by the NRH Zoning Ordinance to reverse a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. RECOMMENDA TION: To deny PZ 98-32 and Ordinance No. 2330. \ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . - -1 :::r- w r<) <%: rJ 4 -:r: 9 N u ...., ::r H N :¿: :;,. lOR . , .I .I 2 S ...... - o 1A 7,8789 AC .' 6¡ I :!) .~. 01 ;. a: \:. t- i\j TA.9\o/3A 4.86 AC lR PZ 98-32 Agenda Item # Site Plan Available for Public Review At the Planning and Zoning Office - . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2330 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO AUTHORIZE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by changing said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THA T, in case number PZ 98-32, a Special Use Permit be hereby authorized for a telecommunications tower on the property described as follows: Being a 3,890 square foot lease area located at the northeast corner of Lot 15A, Edgely Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in the Deed Records Tarrant County Texas. This property is located at 4174 Wilman Ave. 2. THA T, the development regulations contained in the C2- Commercial zoning district of Ordinance 1874 shall govern development of said property, except where amended below. The regulations contained herein shall prevail over any inconstancies with the regulations contained in Ordinance 1874. a. Location: The tower and building locations shall be in general accordance to the site plan attached as Exhibit A. b. Floorplan and Elevation: The equipment and area floorplan and tower elevations shall be in general accordance to the site plan attached as Exhibit A. c. Tower Height: The overall height of the monopole tower shall not exceed 75 feet in height. d. Fencing: A 6-foot tall chain link fence shall be constructed in accordance with Exhibit A. Ordinance No. 2330 Page 1 . . 3. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 4. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this Ordinance. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF AUGUST 1998. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 14th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1998. ATTEST: Mayor Charles Scoma City of North Richland Hills, Texas . City Secretary Ordinance No. 2330 Page 2 . . - City of North Richland Hills, Texas ~ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Ordinance No. 2330 Page 3 . . -- 5. PZ 98-32 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF NEXTEL CORPORATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A COMMUNICATIONS TOWER ON A PORTION OF LOT 15A, EDGLEY ADDITION. (LOCATED IN THE 7500 BLOCK OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY) DENIED Chairman Davis opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come forward. Ms. Sherry Conyers presented this request explaining that co-location is not possible in this situation and a SUP is required because the tower is 10' taller than what is allowed in the ordinance. Seeing no additional proponents and no opponents, the public hearing was closed. Responding to a question, Mr. LeBaron stated that a 65' tower could be built at this location by right. He reiterated that the SUP is required because the tower is 10' taller than allowed by ordinance. Mr. Lueck stated that 10' didn't really make that big a difference, in his opinion, stating that if they could build a 65' tower there now, 10' didn't really matter. Mr. Bowen concurred stating that he would rather see them get the additional 10' they are requesting instead of erecting an additional tower somewhere else. Mr. Wood stated that the ordinance was written to eliminate as many towers as possible in the City. He stated that the part of the ordinance granting them the right to build a 65' tower also says that a certain distance has to be between them. There is an existing TU tower near this location. Mr. Davis stated that if this tower were to fall the TU power lines could be damaged. Part of the ordinance states that the towers should be built to fall only onto their own property. Mr. Laubacher, seconded by Mr. Blue, moved to deny PZ 98-32. The motion carried with a vote of 4 - 2. Messrs. Laubacher, Blue, Davis and Wood were in favor of this motion. Messrs. Lueck and Bowen were opposed. Page 3 8/13/98 P & Z Minutes . Nextel Communications 8585 N. Stemmons Fwy., S. Tower, 10th Floor Dallas, TX 75247 214-599-8425 Fax 214-599-8555 August 21, 1998 City of N. Richland Hills Christopher Baker Barry Lebaron Valorie 7301 Northeast Loop 820 N. Richland Hills, TX 76182 Fax: 817-656-7503 In response to the denial the Planning and Zoning Commission gave Nextel Communications on August 13, 1998. Nextel would like to be set on the agenda for the Council Hearing September 14, 1998. To address the SUP application for a Communications Tower to be set at 7504 Grapevine Highway. . Please call if further assistance is needed. 972-877-8425. TtJ;tpks, ¡J ~onY;;;; /) 972-877 -8425 Original to follow by mail. ---.-.-. ~(j(TH RJ~ Içc!f RECEIVED ~ , (0 AU6 14 199~8 ~. \~ , \-<l Æ ~NG & 1..rP'7 ".~ . . . . . . . . . · · · Keller . . N4ÐRTH RICHLAND HILLS .-t. :, > >- .:; <"J Cì ::J <"J r; ~ C. ::J - " >- .. . ;.- ,-. (j s,t . .-L - DC.A-rID#--\ 0 F' c.E u..- /ÐwEtLS ~~: " \ '-=--_..: .- ,- '"::..-- c.......c 'C..f ... ,ur '- ~ ____.1 I I I .., I I "- I I \ r::: " 0 I C/) \ - 1 C/) " () C) I v ~ C\I \ .S ~ I to -.: ~ W 0r- e:( , I ~ I \ , -!' --I I .:; I , >- I I I \ I ~ I 0 I 'tJ I I 1 r -J U ~ I 1 0 _I - I I I IX) 'tJ r \ I I 0 Q) I or- m I I 0 - \ I I 1- \ 1 ; \ \ " ! I \ .J::. I I "- I 1: r 'V I \ I 0 ".... w - "- - \ :- 3: ~C\I I r .J _ .J or- ::>. _J l..' 0 .J I t/J ~ I - '- C/) E ~ ~ J: CO "- l.t)" "- tU C) ::¡ tU ¡; 3: .!!! Ï 'tJ r::: ~ .J::. () ã: .J::. 1: o Z w .., I L /i I L J" ./ \; I /1 _II r I I I ~I I I I I >- - Õ E o =: tU J: _ .1 4.3 mites IX) M to c« \.. , L r- \) /' ..> \ \ ~'·I.J , \$'6) ?/tv I o~~-: g I C\I I 0 I \ I rJ r .J CITY OF N$RTH RICHLAND HILLS . . 3, 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9, . Planning & Inspection Services June 23, 1998 Ms. Sherry Conyers Nextel Communications 8585 N, Stemmons Freeway South Tower 10th Floor Dallas, Texas 75247 RE: Special Use Permit for a Communications Tower Ms. Conyers: I have reviewed the Special Use Permit application submitted to the Planning and Zoning Office. The following comments specifically follow the development guidelines established in the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills. 1. Inventory of existing communication towers: Information relative to an inventory of communications towers within one mile of the proposed site has not been submitted. 2. Site plan: A site plat for the development has been submitted. However, the site plan does not indicate the construction materials for the proposed equipment cabinet, or landscaped areas, Additionally, existing zoning surrounding the proposed site should be indicated on the site plan. Legal Description of the site: This information was not submitted. Description of maintenance needs: This information was not submitted. Engineers' certification: This information was provided. Total capacity of the tower: This information was not submitted. Evidence of the structural integrity: This information was provided. Failure characteristics: This information was not submitted. Certification from the FAA: This information was not provided. P.O. Box 820609· Nonh Richl,md Hills, Texas. 76182-0609 USA 7301 Nonheast Loop 820 . 817-581-5514 . FAX 817-656-7503 . . . 10. Letter of intent: This information was not submitted. It is necessary for you to provide the necessary documentation outlined above before this item will be scheduled for a hearing with the Planning and Zoning Commission and public notice given. I have enclosed, for your convenience, a copy of the Communication Tower regulations as established in the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, C¿~~-:Þ,~ Christo~(;r 'Q-Saker Planner . . . -- -- ---- ._'.~ "L.;.,-.,'L.:...I.- VI ¡¡':'.'.n..;:) ~14::;':;::1t:::;.:;.:;. r-' .1J¿/I}4 Nextel Communications 8585 N. Stemmons ¡"wy., S. Tower, 10th Floor Dallas, TX 75247 214.599·8425 Fax 214.599.8555 August 6, 1998 City of N. Rich1and Hills Ber-ry LeBaron 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Tx 76180 Fax# 817-656-7538 To Whom It May Concer-n: Nextel Communications welcomes anyone needing a location around tbe GrapevineJLoop 820 area to collocate at our site located at 7504 Grapevine Highway. Nextel is presently working closely with other carriers in regards to collocation. We will provide anyone with detailed maps of our locations and ask that any carrier do the same. This particular location we will have installed a collocatabJe pole and plenty of Kround space to snit the needs of others. Sinc~rely, /J ~W&¡ ( DMy'. Sherry éonyers ¡; Leasing/Zoning 972.877·8425 . . . -- -- ---- ._.~, . ,L.:,,-. J c:.L- ur c:......H.::> ¿14;:"::I:;¡~::':;':> P. 03,.04 Federal Avia~ion Administration Southwest Region Air Traffic Division, ASW-S20 Port Worth, TX 76193-0520 ISSUED DATE: 08/06/98 AERONAUTICAL STUDY No: 98~ASW-3189-0E NEXTEL COMMuNICATIONS B 5 B 5 N STEMMONS FRWY S TWR, 10TH FL DALLAS TX 75247 ..*' DETERMINA.TION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION .... The Federal Aviation Administration has completed an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U,S,C., Section 44718 and, if applicable. Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: Dcscripcion: ANTENNA TOWER/S51-866 MHZ @ 100 W ERP Location: Latitude: Longitude I Heights: RICHLAND HILLS TX 32-49-56.64 NAD 83 097-14-13.91 100 feet above ground level (AGL) 686 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is (are) met: Marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. This determination expires on 02/06/00 unless: (a) extended, revised or terminated by the issuing office or (h) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (PCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determina~ion_ In such case che determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction or on the date the FCC aeniee the application. NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST as POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED TO THIS OFFICE AT LRAST 15 DAYS PRIO~ TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, fre9uency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, frequency (1es) or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase in heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include tempora1 r I construction equipment suCh as Al.G-Ø6-19'38 15: 42 8172225981 99% P.02 . . . . .-- ~'-' .Ir._'-/U ..I.O·.Ir. ~c:....... c:.L Ur- I r=.,',H;:) 2145998555 P. 04.·lJ4 . cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater ~han the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this 5tructure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airs~ace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance reBponsib~lities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. A co~y of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Comm1ssion if che structure is subject to their licensing auchority. If we can be of further assistance. please contact our office at 817-222-5534. On any future correspondênce concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 98-ASW-3189-0E. /2/1JAd (1/ /lu::,¡,<! ruce C. Beara Specialist. Airspace Branch (DNE) 01 r.~_1 ~ 1 "'= A~ Q1"~~~QQ1 ~...... C D7 TOTAL P.134 . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPLICATION FOR A COMMUNICATIONS TOWER Pursuant to the provisions of the FederalTelecommunications Acts of 1996, the , followjng information is ne'cessary to enable the Planning & 'Zoning Commission and City ·Council to properly evaluate all applications to locate telecommunications antennas /towers in the City of North Rich/and Hills. If additional space is needed for any question, attach an additional sheet. 1. Name / Address / of Applicant 11/ r¿y Ù:,../ ~ YJ ;"n U.vl( é.,,¡ -II ò r1.s. ~5R5 /\/. S'/('oYV/rY10'-¡'\ h?1.<J) ~. 7::,(0('.-:, Sk ¡O"~ r/. Ì),.\ IIA.s ---¡ x ìS.)l{ì 2. Contact person / telephone CIf 01\e.tZ-íU...\ I C'o\~ Li -e...L~ . . ell';) - <6ìì - ~LI óS . 3. Indicate the type of proposed antenna \ tower installation described below: a. Attach an antenna to an existing free-standing tower. b. Attach an antenna to an existing building or alternate structure. c. Construct a new free-standing tower. V d. Construct an addition to an existing tower. Note: If no tower is constructed, do not complete the remainder of this application. Contact the Building Official for a building permit application. 4. What type of tower structure is proposed? a. A monopole or other self-supported structure (height: 71 e f ); b. A guyed tower (height: ¡J / A ). 5. Provide a site plan of the property showing the location of the proposed tower, all existing and proposed buildings, parking areas, fences, masonry screening walls and landscaped areas. The site plan shall include a legal description of the CD417 (7-97) 1 . . . property. Furnish information regarding the height and design of the proposed tower. 6. Attach photos or drawings of all equipment, structures and antennas. 7. Provide a map showing all existing communications towers within a one mile radius of the proposed tower. 8. Provide a map showing the location of the applicant's existing towers that are within the City and within one mile of the border of North Rich/and Hills. Furnish information about the height and design of each tower. 9. Attach a map showing the proposed provider's current coverage area for the City of North Rich/and Hills? 10. Provide a ~escription of anticipated maintenance needs, including frequency of service, personnel needs, equipment needs, and traffic, noise or safety impacts of the maintenance. 11.Attach a report from a Texas professional structural engineer documenting the following: a. The tower height, and design. Include a cross section of the tower structure. b. Total anticipated capacity of the structure including the number and types of antennae which can be accommodated. c, Evidence of the structural integrity of the tower structure. d. Failure characteristics of the tower and evidence that the site and setbacks are adequate to contain a failure within the site. e. Certification that the tower will meet all FCC, FAA and local building codes. 12. Attach a letter indicating the applicant's intent to lease excess space on the tower and to lease excess land on the site, if structurally and technically possible. 13. Given its position on the proposed location, if the structure should fall to the ground along its longest dimension, would it remain within the WO ert boundaries? ~ Yes No LC\.í\d ow·"\e...cLS· " ~,-$'M~: Would it avoid habitable structures? t/'" Yes No Would it avoid public streets, utility lines, and other antennas/towers? No / Yes CD 417 (7-97) 2 . 14. No new communications tower shall be permitted unless the applicant demonstrates that no existing tower or alternate structure can accommodate the proposed antenna. The applicant shall provide information which supports why no existing tower or alternate structure located within the City meets the applicant's engineering requirements, including height, structural strength, electromagnetic interference, fees, costs, contractual provisions or other limiting factors that render existing towers or alternate structures unsuitable. 15. State the name(s) of the telecommunications providers or other users of the proposed tower and describe the use to be made by each user. IV) ,4 16. Will this a':ltenna / tower site be connected to other sites? If so, describe how it will be connected and who will be the backhaul provider. , q e s, - f-r-411 s r é:VJ I~ ~ C) f'f .f,) 0 Ute-...) (- c."> /h rn u.. Þ7 ( 'è....4 I ( I...., h tv (" ld '\ ~ .'7 //~ Y' Z, / J ~. c ~ . 17. Describe the efforts made to collocate the facilities proposed for this antenna / tower Identify the location of on existing towers or structures in the same general area? these existing sites. jJ~...Ic.';J Ixrn Ie - hn'7/e 17 r r- cI h ~L I ,3 ]</,J <:.'.~ Ic (' -/ It: (~é'ÞY/./ _J/ <:' I t' ~ -41 ~ ()( I /} rf ' / I .5 <" /--1-V1) (' Î'~ r~ ,... r.J I h...I c' +v ¿"/Cole..) I cI 18. Regarding No. 17 above, describe why these existing sites are not feasible. (~çj é6n:'" fn'-'<.c.· j,tJì.7 0 f p/v-fl,'" 3 þ7 ....'7";1:'''/ P.5 ~ J / 19. Will collocation be allowed to other telecommunications providers at the requested site? If not, explain, tles. . CD 417 (7-97) 3 . . 20. Vlill the applicant or the proposed provider reconfigure its antennas and other equipment to accommodate other telecommunications providers? If not, explain. -yes, 21. Describe the proposed provider's plan to minimize the number of telecommunications antennas / towers needed to cover the City of North Richland H¡lIs. CD 41ì (7-97) 4 UN/SITf It Dec-=::-j)er 2. 1997 @ Un, ~TE \1r. C.~n COI;'.':ay \ex:;;. 3585 ;<orth S:~mmens Freeway Sou::: Tower. Suite 1000 DaE~. TX ï5:·J.] Ç£fl<j Lz" £V'û,"i.1'C".ì'- C f>¿i'Z 6Lué_ Dee:.: :. fr. Conway: This ~;;:ter is i:1 response to your inquiry regarding the separation required among antç:-_-:.::.s at sh::.red radio sites to prevent mutual radio interference among the systems at the ê.:::~nna sit~. UniSite's radio engineering group has specialized in detennining the rlecess.2I)' spa.:ing between multiple operators on shared antenna towers or building 1oc2.::0:15. In general the necessary antenna separation between antennas is dependent on :l nu:::.'::·er of f::ctors in.:: I uòing: e · · · · · · The type of radio equipment and technology Th~ particular combination on a particular site The 5pecitìc equipment characteristics (these vary from manufacturer to m::.nufacturer) The type of antennas The frequencies used or likely to be used at the antenna site T r::n.smitter power levels it is ::.-;ically necessary to analyze each antenna site on a case-by-case basis to detennine '.vheL:er radio interference will occur. UniSite has developed a very sophisticated 50fu'.'~e tool called UniStar that is used to perfonn detailed analysis of interference at shan~': radio sites. UniStar is used to detennine the required minimum antenna sepa:-.:.:ion, and includes a database that stores the characteristics of a wide range of radio ~qui;:::ent. CniStar is used to analyze the following types of shared site interference: · Transmitter and receiver intennodulation and hannonics · Receiver desensitization · TraI1smitter noise e The :'0110wing Table is a rough estimate of the minimum vertical separation required aet\\eeI1 antennas for diftèrent combinations of technology. Please note that these are ·-:30· -. ~~envil e. 3",;,!e 100 Richardson. ~X 75081 972,3487600 F/',X 972669 2')00 1::00 :..."'SITE -- e . only ~stimates. The actual required spacing can \'ar)' significantly. You will note that ¡Ìle spacin~ \'aries from 0 to 20 tèet for combinations of t\\'O technologies. ;..tinimum VCl1ical Scparatil)[1 Technology ESMR Cellular A Cellular B NSPeS 929-931 Paging 940 NPCS I SPCS A SPCS B SPCS C . Type TXlRX TXlRX TXlRX RX TX TX I TXlRX TXlRX TXIRX ESI.1R TXlRX NA ]0····· 15*-··· 51eet 0·' 0·' I 5 tect 5 tect 5 :'~~: Cellu!ar A TXlRX 10** .. NA 51cet 10 fect 10" .. 0·· I 5 t'cct 51eet 5 !~~: Cellular S TXlRX 15·**· 5 feet NA 15 feet 10···· 10···' I 5 teet 5 tÚt 5 f~~~ NPCS RX 5 fect I 0 feet 15 tcet O· 10···· 10·" · I 5 teet 5 teet 5 (~~: 929-931 Paging TX 0** 10···· 10···· 10"· · O· O· I 20 ... 5 teet 5 :~~: 940 NPCS TX 0** 0" 10"· · 10·· .. O· O· I 5 tcet 20 ... 5 f~~! SPCS A TXlRX 5 feet 51eet 5 feet 51cet 20 ..11 51eet I :\.-\ 5 tÚt 5 !~.:t SPeS B TXlRX 51eet 5 feet 5 tcet 51eet 5 tcet 20 ... i . . 'A 5 r~;;:t ) teet SPcs C TXlRX 5 feet 5 feet 5 tcet 51eet 5 tcet 51cct I 5 tcet 5 tcet :\,-\ · 0 fect ofVel1ical Separation requires 6 feet of horizontal separJtion .. Horizontal Separation can be small if Sector Antennas used. ... Wideband operators may accept closer separations since harmonic inta;'c:-ence only alTects certain channels [hat could be avoided at this site. ** ** Interference from pagers at closer distances is narrowband and may be acceptable to Cellular Pro\'iders in some circumstances ·""Reduced Cellular and ES\-IR values based on recent analysis Reduced narrowbanå receive \'S. Cellular based on latest modeling. All Vel1ical Distances rr.easured from the bottom of the higher antenna to the top of the lower antenna. I hope that this information is of use to you. If you ha\'e any further qUèStions. please don't hesitate to call me at 1-800-unisite. Sincer~¡y. ~'-~S;_~ Dr. Robert Mawrey Vice President of Systems and Technology © L'nISnE. -~-. n !¡."I¡ I ~ nmnH.lItM. 11111111111111111 I ilwwwvr"·r -~--$.. ~ y ,0' -,/ 77r~ ; ~ I~ i' ~ J ... <::> ... .. 00'" ~ " " OO.QO$ .... 1.- !: - --" /"~ ;.._! I :~~ I II ... I <1"''' I I I. I I:! I I.; . ¡ . ~, ¡- ~: t , I I L J l= § Is :1 ~¡ 1 " i I I & I I 88= I I å~:: ¡ ¡ III II .. ~ ,,~ .,..-<'c-'ö <I~/ ~ ~~.,..... ~ ____.___.,!!~I!!.___.___.!"_O!:!!~g~..........~../ / ~~~ .ct)~. / ~ ~'1- ....~;. ..........__ .../) 47....,.>0":~.L. .... . --~-.-iÑr;j:D&r----"~-"-' , ~... a -'" oS> I .. &g~ t kg; ~¡ ~~~ ~~ ... ): ~ ~ ~ , r;;- 0--t~ h: ~~ ~ U ~ ~.-/ '- '- '- "- \.:1\' I~:~ ~ II ~i: ~~:::'" /- \t h~,- / .................. .J:> t...t~~ srXJ ~ !:! ~... ~ I\. -- " ~~ . '- ~ I .!;8'Z9 .II ,,81 )~...--- - _..u__.__._______~ _ .___......... I' f' t \ ~ ~ mnnnn__m_mnmn_m _________ ____nn::::"'''____n_¡_m_''~___ · __ __ ~ '" '- i _...~..n. --'-,~ .. '- ..... i~ ~ I" <:J ., L.. , ~ ~ .-.-.-,.~, .' ~, ~." ,\' '., ~ " ., ~ bj~ ~¡¡¡ .... .. .. v ~~ g" :t ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ :! ~~. .... ~~ ~ -c( §Sj ~""- ~~ :::? <.> ~ J; =: ~~ .. ~ (ì¡" ~- ~ ~~ . 8~ ~ ~ ~ ...... ~~~ ~~,' ~- ~~~ ~ '- ~ ~.M,"- II') - j .. " .. - · t! '~i 1 ~š ~ l" 1 : !'1! ¡¡ !Ïi i ~~ i & _'" ~ a ~ &~ Ii! "- ~ I!t , ". " ill j fi~i -t~ - d1! tc!~ i' !~ ,,~.¡. ~ rH~ ~tlll I-II I~ll! ~f;~ ~~!l -~'1 h'h la!.!: 1 ,!h! ¡!f:¡ 6'1~th ;~t~ ¡ I I h~~ 1Iq~ ili,K~' :Ihi¡ jt¡.J p '~~l~ t!_~ &h~E! :~!: 1Iq,~~'8~h'= ·Id:"~:"i.z:" ,,~..._ E E¡~J3 5 tt¡:! ¡'~:"¡~" ~f~~~I§i't a: j!;;~~~~ -¡¡~ ~ -lr~t I~~ti ... nnJ~!Hj ! - -1 J ~ ;; 'I ¡:;j ~ t" 'fti r ! j ~ 1~ f t ~ t jJ I j ~î ïJ ì i ~~ -1 t äf J~ ¡ ~¡ f- I 1 ," I! ~ ~ J () ¡;:' 'P(I) ,..: U <-> ill ~ >-x => ~~ <"I... :s:1- ~ U) :I: . i~ ~ ~an <"I... Cf) z C w...J 0 >< ~t.~~ 0-... z= - <-> ~ ~ .:1:... :;::I: 10 ä ~;ton", ~::I:C Wo ~ '" I II. ~¡:!!~[¡!! o..z '" II 0 .~:I <1:<1: 0 '- I ~~~;~ a::...J ZU) U) ... wa: <:J:I: 0<: 1&1 ~ü 0-10 :I: :::I! ~ ~O UN .., ..J ~Z. æ 5;ã: ......, >< -z a II z~~~~ .... ' (I) :z 0<: Q. ..-.-/ <.. "'- "'-~ ~ "\ \ I !i ~ b I ~ .. $ 9 .. ~.:¡ p;~:> d~ ill!¡ , III~~ ~~~ h~ II h§~ ~_h~ !i~¡ ä i~~ h~5 ~ h~ dh <Þ ~ ~ h $!~;¡; "..~ 951 ' !oI~t ¡ ~ § !! : ni ~~ ¡I. IUI I_ nl lid II 1;0 '- " , :I; , ".- -- -- .-' -.~ ,OI-oC. ..·,oc .0-,9 .0'001 oOI·,t -- ___n__n______ ____~ __no. _ n ¡, , 1 \7 , '1 n"n___ ____n'. _n n_. n_n _. n n _"__ ___ '- '1 \ ----..... \7 " '''''''''\ '<:J '1 <q '1 \7 '1 \7 \7 \7 \ \ '1 q j ~~ I ~ , 1, \7 II J' ~ I I' ~ ~ 't' ~ q =t '1 \7 i i : ¡ ~~ ~ j ~ q ! 'Q ~ , i ~ ¡ .~ ¡ Þ :, ' ! ~ ~ I . 'Q I 'Q I I 'Ç} f~~:=t \7 : : q : q : ~ I ~ I I , I " ! '\1¡~ <; :'1 ~! q ! \7 '1 '1 \7 $ \ \ \ "- '-- <" .9s- q \7 '1 \7 '1 \7' i ~ ~ i .0-"" ...... Ilh 1_ I II i~i ill'· ~2~ ¡oI: ~ ~~, $'" " mll!¡~ t¡¡1~ ! ~ ,~. ~,~~ ~~~~ Id I: ~ n~nh ~n~ '1 <:J \7 '1 \7' <q ~ ~ ~ Jl.BI.OO.OOS "7"'.... ~~ ~'"'b ~o..: !::>~ ~o..: \ijQ:Õ :¡;:¡:) ~ ~~. ~ e~ S <:l ~~ ~\2 ~~ ~ 8:S .... C) ..... ~ t.: ;¡ ::.: ~·II '- C) lit..... \0 ., ~ .. ~ ü c= 'Pen ,.: 1& U I: ê >oX :::> =i ('I... ~f- ~ U) :I: . Z ~N C ?ë ~ ('I... U) 0 ~ 0-... UJ-' U e ~ ,:!J Z:d . ~ ~ ~§¡~ .:E:... ;;;:1: OJ ä "':E:C UJo ~ 01 ~ II. ~!~~§¡ o.z 1 01 _I ... 0 ....~ <C<c 0 « 1 ~ ~~~ CC-' ZIO 10 ~ I.IJD: ~:I: ~~ ~~ >-OJ ::¡; ...0 UN ...J ~Z '",~ aCC "'''' ; -2 It') é3 Z~~~~ ..... . en z 0: 0.. ~~ N U «1 ..( t8 ;¡¡ æ~ ~ @. ~ ~ æ;.o 111 ~. ~ ¡,~ O=:¡ ~ j~9i .. O=:¡ a i~' f~ ~~ ~§ o ~ &10 i g!~,; ~ II!: t~! ã ~... k Ii § ~~~ U I d § i h~ II ~ w ¡t¡ti . If ¡t¡ I I~I i' K, ~~ i 19!1ii ~d i Ii ~~ I d d I¡ o.~ :a8~ ~'n .o-.¡ , 'I ,0-,( .o.,¡ , g !oI _'4 ~,I i . Iã! :'3i '" ¥I ~.. ~I'i ~ I ~ _, ~ ..,§!!S . . Q hili I Q Q~ ~J; I'.!U9a ~9~i!~~ ~ Ihf¡~~ i il!1~1 .0',( .0-.' Z l- e > w iii .o-~~ .0'. h . _ 8I~ .. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ";. --. Department: Planning & Inspections Council Meeting Date: Subject:Request of Jim Brown for a Reduction of the Masonry Agenda Number: RequIrement Un Lot 14, Hlock 3, J.L. Autrey Addition. (Located at 4019 Rufe Snow Drive) Resolution No . 98-44 9/14/98 PZ 98-35 Mr. Brown is the owner of Brown Service Company that has an existing building at 4015 Rufe Snow Drive. Mr. Brown on December 8, 1997 received a Special Use Permit on 4019 Rufe Snow Drive to construct a new contractor's shop and garage. The property is zoned C2-Commercial. Mr. Brown originally was going to construct the building with an 80% masonry coverage on each elevation. However, Mr. Brown is seeking to reduce the masonry percentage on his proposed building to provide masonry only on the front of the office and 25' down each side, as indicated on the submitted site plan and elevations. The City Council recently approved an ordinance that requires 75% masonry construction for all new commercial buildings, but the ordinance also allows the reduction of the masonry building requirement by site plan approval by the City Council. The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this item at its August 13, 1998 meeting and recommended denial. The applicant has provided a letter requesting consideration of this site plan by the City Council. A three-fourths vote is not required by the NRH Zoning Ordinance to reverse a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. RECOMMENDA TION: To deny PZ 98-35. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ . ~ Othe, Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Flnan",ì DIreCl"; Page 1 of ~ \,t:.' .- .,\\"!9 ~\'.\' 1~' p.í¡1G -, 1.\ {? ~ 2~, e ,0 þ.OON, 1 f TR.284A '-~\~ '^" ! .56 @ ~\17 ~$ v~,:9 tz a: :< ~ 0 ~O 40~ - -À,' ! 6 1.\'),0" <t '-'\. '" .. L , ~ i,1\ c a: ~~ c ~"15A <t 8 u v\ 'Q~ v\\\~3 TR,284 1..\ \ \'" 60 '^~ HA ~ 7.22 AC 9 0 70 ... Jr/).. ~, '\À~ ;J 4~OA ...\~"b\ - - !1 701', b7/ b t7/ ). 1 ft I- 1 1A ~ 12C 128 ~ (f) - '4 6A '" .. 2 w ~ 2 6 12 A v..'')()., w:5- -1 A e w (f ~ I 3 ~ H ~ 3 7& 8 , ~ ~ ~ S- I- ~'\ 11 A >..Ò' (f) TA 203 ~u ~ 8 ~ c.. 1.35 AC 4 ~ ~ '"T 4 :r: I- ~ ~ w - -1> ~ CD 5 ~ 0.. 9~ ..... .15__ 6 ~ 10 ^ ~ 10 7 ~ ::>: 12A ø... 10 11 4ft 9 ~ f'r) TR TR 2G6 2G7 )Hla j1:.\.. 5CI 8A ~ TR 2H1A ., ~ì¡:; e TO ?~1 J,ó... ð 88 "7'\\ PZ 98-35 - Agenda Item # e 6. PZ 98-35 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF JIM BROWN FOR A REDUCTION IN THE MASONRY REQUIREMENTS ON LOT 14, BLOCK 3, J.L. AUTREY ADDITION. (LOCATED AT 4019 RUFE SNOW DRIVE) DENIED Jim Brown presented his request. He explained that because concrete has gotten so expensive he is requesting to drop the percentage of masonry on the building he is going to construct. Mr. Brown submitted pictures of surrounding metal buildings with brick veneers. He stated that the City just constructed a metal building behind him, and showed pictures of it. Responding to a question, Mr. Brown stated that the building was going to be 20% masonry. Additionally, Mr. Brown stated that he would be willing to extend the masonry wall to hide the metal part of the building on the northeast property line. Mr. Lueck, seconded by Mr. Bowen, moved to deny PZ 98-35. The motion carried with a vote of 5 - 1. Messrs. Lueck, Bowen, Blue, Laubacher and Wood voted in favor of this motion. Mr. Davis was opposed. e - Page 4 8/13/98 P & Z Minutes RESOLUTION NO. 98-44 e A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS, APPROVING THE REQUEST OF JIM BROWN FOR A REDUCTION IN THE MASONRY REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPERTY AT 4019 RUFE SNOW DRIVE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Ordinance Number 1874, as amended, provides for site plan review by the Planning and Zoning Commission and approval by the City Council to reduce the percentage of exterior masonry on a proposed new building; and WHEREAS, Mr. Jim Brown has submitted a site plan for a new building to be located at 4019 Rufe Snow Drive and is requesting approval to reduce the percentage of exterior masonry; now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. e THA T, the site plan attached as Exhibit 'A" is hereby approved for a reduction in the percentage of exterior masonry as shown on the site plan and elevation drawings of the proposed building. 2. THA T, any building permits shall be consistent with the attached site plan. 3. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSIDERED THIS SITE PLAN REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED DENIAL AT THEIR MEETING ON AUGUST 27,1998. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission e Resolution No, 98-44 Page 1 1 e PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 14th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1998. ATTEST: Mayor, Charles Scoma City of North Rich/and Hills, Texas City Secretary City of North Rich/and Hills, Texas' APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ßa~{!]û~ Department H d APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: e Attorney for the City e Resolution No. 98-44 Page 2 2 ( . j..\ 1/ ~y 2ZI ",' a: .¡o .....0 0 4 - ~ 16 ,}..?o... 4: ~ e :L a: ~ ~"15R 4: 8 U '" v\~~ TR.284 0-.\014R 1.-\ \ \'" 7.22 Ac 9 '" dr-I).. " 11 ..: t.I ~ 4 V?, 0 A \..' 1e.J VIEW - - /1 r,t,L/(, g (,(,50 5 ~- ..... 1 N (f) - '" 6A ~ ~ .. W ~ 2 W~ 6 ~ 1: -1 A w (f c).. 1\0') 7ff 3 ~ H ~ 3 8 I ~ ~~ S. I- ~"\ TR 203 (f) Oo.U ~ 4 8 ~ C. 1. 35 AC -------- 0 4 ~ ~ ~ . ,. <:) :>- >À C ~ -51' e 0\ .... ~ s;. 9~ ...... .15_ _ .. 6 g 10 ^ .R. ~ - "- 7 ~ .. ~ 12A " 11 0 4ft 10 ~ ¡ TR TR ).H13 ,5 2G6 2G7 ." 5C TR 2H 1 ~ð' .. '1> ~.I{¡, '1~'C- ~ -Ji^' 5Bl- .s~')- -.... ~ l:.,,~\O 5A;'" PZ 98-35 e Agenda Item # e ~BROWNtm SERVICE COMPANY, INC. August 18, 1998 Dear Sirs: e I respectfully request a hearmg with the city council m regards to a request for masonry reduction on a proposed new buüdmg. This project was voted on by the planning and zoning committee and turned down. I would like for the city council to reconsider the planning and zoning decision. And allow me to improve the area m which my busmess has been located at for over 31 years. Sincerely c;- ~ / ,o~:\H RÎ~ .~ ~ '<'~ .' C5 D ¡:'I""r""'n /LT'\ V \ ! :>.. t ¡ >- 1\, r 1 J ¿; \ ·5 AU6 2 0 19~a ~ ~ .k' 't() 0' ~G I".JS?~ 4015 RUFE SNOW DRIVE· FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76180. (817) 284.9204 W/7 !ZiI,cE S..vOV i:k;u~ La, J± &lJU:. =3 o¡: 11:r1£ J i..'/~4_1i.ii~~,;aJ' - --"- Phone NO{&'l72 :l&4_~_~~ Address of Property Owner: 401 S I2uM S;V'ß&! [;V ___. ________ ________._ C;ty: d.7Jt &CilC£No¡J,lilS ___State: T,,-___ e, Cir¡ of North Richland Hills 7301 N,E. Loop 820 No,..J¡ Richland Hills, TX 76180 817·581·5515 Property Location: Street Address of Property: Legal Description of Property: (PleaSd prinr ail r9S~Cns~s) Application for Site Plan Review Property Owner Information: Name of Property Owner: k b?~WA¡/ ~ Ni~H Zip: 7<pl.iJO___. Applicant / Authorized Agent Information: "Note: An affidavit signed by the property owner is required when the agent is not the property owner" Name ot Applicant! Aulhoá"d Agent: JilYJ-_.-&o.W"/ __________ _ _ Phone N°@i7.2?54 . _ 'JlL>4: Address:4f!.!5~--'2,---_______ __ _.____... ...._________ __ __ _ C;ty¿.n/_tL~ß{.¿.5 '-____ __ ___ State l;::. z;p: KolBO Type of Site Plan Review: Planned Development '~pecific Use Permit R·S-T Townhomes e Required Documents: The following table contains a checklist of the minimum items required for Site Plan Review, - -'.--.-.-. "-.- -. --- ____u___..__.____.____________ ______ Plannad O'.!velcpm'.!nt Sp'.!Cial Use Permil P!OtP~~_5_h~w~g, '.!xi~hng ~.ela.n~~~ structures, b~~" I~:.s:~?~ndar~::_a~~.:.~s~~nts, _'n ." _. Fi_ 2, _T~p~g!~hiC ~n.t.0~_:t~~n,."':~:ontou~~ draw~ at two fOOl in~:~'al~:.___. nn_ ___ _". , 3, !=Iev~tion.~r~ings.?!.a" bUlI~~~n_~ating lt1e prop~S~d ex::rior f~~~_~.:.t:!i~'::.___.., ,_...___.R.. 4,._Landscaping, lighting, fencing, screening, and.~icating ~eights._,_._,_, ,,_ ..-,--._fL, 5, Location of egress and ingress, R '-- -------~-~--- -.--------- ----------- - . Cif·str'.!et parking and loading facilities. ._ ----,------'3......__ 7, Ail padastrian walks, malls, and open areas. R ---.---- -----------.-.-- - ------------- 8, ?rGoosed land uses indicating areas in square feet R -.----.-..------ ------~_._---- --- ----- l ,~ccatl~~~~.?~s of~igns.:including lighting and heights with .elevation ~r.awin~~'h_ _, _'" _, R la, Stre'.!t namès on proposed streets, R --'.'---.. ---0_- R , . R. R· R· R. R, R· ---. -.--- ----. R· R. : _E~stjng & proposed_'^'~t:r, sew~:~~ainage ~ystems;wadi~~~~:_h __ . "_._., 12, Engineering drawings of all public improvemenls to be dedicated to lt1e City, -··-----____4_________.__._.______~ __.____... 13, Utility and drainage easements & location of solid waste disposal facillilies. - -- .----- +- -- ----------------- _.. ..-- -- --.-------..---- ._-- R· R-7-MF Multi.famil/y Townhomes Multi·famlly - , R R R R R R R R - --0___.- _____.__ R R R R R R R R R R (Ca~hbe su~m~tted!~ime o~ platting) R- R R' R R R / certify :,~al I am. or represent. Ihe own~r of the property described above and hereby submlllhis Site Plan 10 Ihe City of North Rich/and HiI/~ and approval. Dale: 7-(, '-1. ~ (.-__--- ..--- _ ó.__ '-...... Iv 6___ 14, Adcltional items as required by lt1e City Council. .-- -- - ------. -- .-.-.---- --. ----------- - --...- - ----- -..--- - --- ~ No's' "W = Required -' Your nama (Printed Name): 3C-o---.~ ~ bCù.-v_ -,- --..-.-----..-.-- -'- 3 .- ---- ---.--- ---------.'-----. Site Plan Review Application CD-419(2-98) " NitH APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT Ci:y of No,'"::1 ,~:ç:;'and Hills ì3CJ 1 N:: L,CCJ 32CJ (.:::IliH~ :r:,"':::!' ~/::o! a1l (~s=cr.s~sj NQr..'1 R:c:;!a.~: Hilts, ï~xas e PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION ¡',lame 0': app,licant I agent: / Jim I6R.oW;{ a 17·53 .55'~:J Siree! aecrass 0': applicant I agent: 0/5 ¿ ~ SÎ cÆ.J W- e,,!/ :::t~;;/dí,0~:::::;'I/J¡ LL~7Z 7(; ISO PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of praperty owner: J't,,! 13;;00,,/ Sin:et aecrass of property owner: ~~ çn&-uU City I S:a~ J Zip Code of property owner: rvuv ' prnJo ,'Iote: Aiiach letter or affidavit from propert'/ owner if cifferenl ff7Jm a;;plic3n1 I agent: 7 ¿, íbO PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Current zomr.g claSSlticatlon: Proposed use of tt:a pr:;perty: . V N£.G/lOt lh7Y70'~~~~ml2'S Oescnbe ir;e nature of the proposed actIVity and any particular chara-:/enstics related 10 lf7e use of lf7e property: 6FF/á LiÞE~ M A , Coy¡ fh~?:)l1-> OF,c¿.e &i4 Snap J!fWVf3S77I1C- I\: C~"'£ ¡"? f& f141\<;ðrJr--¡ h, L~< f. 5,:e ;;i.]n a::a-:ned "If7ich conforms '.'11/" Ine reqUiremen!s tnCfucec In /,~/s packel: ../ Yes ~ No Afficd'llt ai/aefled from pr:;p-:rty Owner tf applicar.! IS not owner: r---- '(es :----¡ No ~ Dale 7 -(p - 9~ ---....- \.....J C< v- ~.1 Þv-.... ~ ( u ~ _ I hereby certify lf7a: I am. or represent. the legal o'··¡r;er of Ihe property de:;cnbe-; abo'le and co .'¡ereby SuOrr1l1 tf7IS ~quest for appro'lal of a Special Use Permit 10 Ihe Planning and Zor.:r; Commission for consicera/,a{J Print Nar7:e v-- ~ -- PART 4, FOR OFFICE USE ONL Y Y~$ I ¡ r~'o -, ~ ,r' 'I "''! " , ç¡.:\ ,..J'U'-\I ~0. "', ç~a'r'¡umoer:6'. '" \ . .ð"'D~>\916. 36; (r, .f'')" ( §e" !)ý\~. S3(tO.OO' $f ~ ~'~\. F ' ':~) ,..,<.(7 , ~,V /1,. .., .-\;'j: 'I ÜJis. ap¡jlic;riq.n-w,l/ not 00 s=.~~(iüTè(J-ror public heanng un'" tf7e appl/ca:ion fee is r~cetv~d. Ja:e of Plar:r./r.g ¿ Zomng Commission PubliC Heanng, Taxe5 Parc? Ja:e (7/ c-:ï¡ cQ;;ñC/(Publlc Hf!anng Liens Pair;' Yes l ¡ No Spe-:¡al Use Permit Approved, ~ Yes : 'No COr.dll/ons of A;;proval: Assessm~.'i"~ Paid? L- Yes I~ No SPECIAL USE PERMIT CD.. 414 (2/96) -- ._.._--_. -- ,\~'J S,:,,/31 S111H ':IN':''1H::Jlõ!O H1õ!OON 31\Iõ!OO moNS 3:1n<!! ~I::J" B 1f'J I ! ~I 18 ~ ~I 2d ~¡: :> I~fi~ E-4 112 t'll ~ ÁNV dWOJ aJIAlIaS i N.M.OtIH '<SO:! IoJOO<!O'TlOI-t'ò . 3::JI:i:iO m3N ';" moN9 3~ ."·.Øf H:7V~'V 3t'11II0 9....J.91~3I ."e,'" 1"ð'r'~'V Y-l1IIa 1l!iNJ.9I;.t! J J~ h~ Px '! ~I- ~ .. ~ !!! '" i! ---==-l~ " , ~w ! #[3 @ 13" L j~ W: \~~ § .",~ ~ ..[~ ~ Ih ~~ \III":!I ~~ uu Ë~î ¡~ iH~ ~~~~ ~~ r: ~ i!lrh ~~ ~ ~ ~o1 ~û Qij ~ :f ..~3- ~~ > N .. J i h~~ ~~ ~ U \II" .. U..o= a o .¡..\!I~ & ~~:¡Œ cli ~ ~ ~~;~ r ¡~~~ I ~ !! ...9>~ r. !Y~~_ t t ¡i1L ~~u~ ~ ~i ~:i~:i ~ <21 ~ ~ ~ 5555 ~IX~~ \] ;; ! f" i :I!, ~ ! ¡~ u h ~ IX ~..~ u;j[ ¡..~ç ~ ð ~ .. 9 ... u ~ .Q'4L H.L.MOI 3Nl1 ÁJ.~~ - -------------------- '" ~ it d Ö -J '" ~ '£ Ö -J , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , _________~---------- _______________ _e__________________________ ---~--- , ' , a iii :¡: .. ' : ~ Q !:I,; : i ~ ~ :~. ~ ! : ~ ~ ~ ~i~~~ , ~ 3d I£~ , !I !I ...;¡o ~ ' ~t~~ ~~~i ~Iu !~~o ";"W ;;I£a ~Hí~ ~~~W~ ~u~a. ' t8.~ i!h;~ "~~!i~ ¡¡Ë,':\~' ...Jol!>~ ð t ; ~ ..' ~ ~ f b ~ ,-, , , , , , . ,0' , , . , , , ~ ~ :. ~ :;; ;¡ '" ~ 'Ï i ! u ¡¡¡ ~~ ~; çl" õ~ .O"t( ~ ... ~ ¡ ~ õ .. irS~ 3.. ... e~" ~ ;I ¡H.:\ 1:;;õi! ~~~~ '" ~ .O·,9t ~ .~e,. i ~ .Q.,. .ø- . r, ., I~>~. 'J , (\, ',j , ~"\ >~' : ~~" ~ tc\ l~<~~ \11 r::~~'~;J : ~~J: ~~ 6 i ~ ~ ~ ~ io 9 it !1 "'~ ~.. ~§ íi\i1 ~t\ ~11:" .. ~ I ð.." ~'¡I~~ ziP ·'IIJ ~ 9 - i1 ~ .. ~ ~-_. I 'I)' !~ '?,~ ~iÓ ill' 'Ill ~ r ~ ¡¡¡ o '" ~ ! (') ~ 9~~"~Q ;~ ; ~f!~~~ ..,t ö 'H"'~'>2 Ir ~ ~~~¡~M9 ~~ g ~~~~i~;= ~t ~ i~~~~i~~ i~ I i ~"'~w~~~; §~ ~ >5..i! >~3 f~ S ~"';;~M:§~ ì~ ~ ¡; ~j¡¡IiI~~IU~ 2~ ~ .. 1II,,"'~g\ll~~ ~Q ~oI) ~ ~ ~~I~~~~~ò ~~ ~ ~8 ",8~~ ~I" - S ~2~~2:'t: f a~ i \ I Uâ:iâ!:¡ ¡ j~ 2 ~i ~ h ~ ~I:'~ Õ "l~~ :. :;§~ ~ 9~~ ~ ~~~ ~ - o~ ~ ::.~ ( ;D''}' } 1~~ h t!. ~ i!! !\l", "'=Ii- ~ ~;i ~; ulll '! ;,~~ ~.. 3Q'" lit'" ~ ~~§ ~S ~ II! '" ~~ ~ i ~ i i: .0'.. .. ~ r .. L ~ ~ ~ ~ r !¡ '" !: ¡i .C:-i'j ~ '< .. .. z L I ~- ~ ~ ... "~ ~ b ¡ ~ ~ "' oW !e!' IIIQ'1 ~Ci~ .~~ U" æð~ , I II 11 Db- " r-, III" v ~n ~I' ~¡i ;¡:. ~¡i 15g ~:¡ 0(:. õ,' .q ~:, ~:I' "" !~ I' . :', ~: , !II' ::Q :f . na ; ,.;;> :I'~ : ~ ::~ 'I" : ~ IU :¡i !,~ " :I " " n " II .ø-.Q :I I' " n " " .>t ~i LI ;11 r: 1 0' ~I ¡I "'I r¡ '? ;. '" ~¡ 8 ~~ \~ ~ " ~ ~~"':... ~...""::""-=-~~=-~.~_'_ "-_"'''_''4J. ......_..._.._,__._...."-..-'_.......-...- _....._ .J'.,'__.~..~._____._...__.-.:...--=_.~.. ...~..". ~ ASYd" ~ ~c:IJ I dl I a = ~! ~lIë ~£ t ~ PI; 'Õ'\"X3J. 'SlllH aN'I"lH:;¡!i!I H.I.i!ION 3^IÖ!!tQ moNS 3:£rði IõIØ" ÀNVdWOJ ~JIA(l~S N.M.OtIH ':so: WOO~HS . 3:>'±!0 rr:3N ";' ''¡' ~r.~.QI*,tI ~~ ~ot n ~ ~ h~ Y.J( ~~II' ..~~ I ,..... \ ·..·.1····......·.'..... i . .: ~ : ii II> .. </ '. t> ~ ~ ~ - ~ '1 I I ~ ~ ~ ~ i I \~ II' ~ ~ ~ /" ~~ i ~ " " i! .. '-....... 0 oiil ¥~ ~ n ¡ ¡L.. _L ~ rª ~" n "" '\ -..., ~ . - J.t19I3t1 3I\'V3 lo.ON .Q..L J .. =. 0" -II' ~~ n u _L Zot Z'¡ / b h / .. %~ _L Zot h /' ~ .. þ~ ill 9 B .. L ~ 8' ~ ;j 8' ~ ~ \ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' " 0': 0-:/ Ž ¡ ~~ f r _L l;j cI ~ h ".- II' .. ~ ~ ! CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 PZ 98-36 Subject:Public Hearing to Consider the Request of the City of North Agenda Number: RICnland HillS to Kemove tne ~peclal Use Permit Allowing Nursery Sales, Truck Rental, and a Temporary Office. ( Located at 5102 Davis Boulevard) Ordinance No. 2332 In 1995, Mr. Kevin Keck applied for a Special Use Permit on Lot 18C, Block 18, Clearview Addition, in order to operate a garden center and truck rental business using a temporary office building. On March 27, 1995, City Council approved Ordinance No. 2040, which granted Mr. Keck his request. The City Council, in their motion, indicated that this special use permit would be reconsidered in 18 months to determine if the use was still appropriate at that location. On May 12, 1997, the City Council voted to not renew Mr. Keck's SUP and at that time gave the applicant six months (6) to cease business operations and vacate the property. Mr. Keck no longer operates a business on the property and has vacated the property. The property is now vacant. The City Attorney has advised the City to repeal Ordinance No. 2040, and remove the Special Use Permit at this location. Repeal of Ordinance No. 2040 will not change the underlying zoning classification of C2-Commercial. The property owner has been notified of the repeal of the SUP and is not opposed. The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this request at its August 13, 1998 meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDA TION: To approve Ordinance No. 2332 to repeal the Special Use Permit for nursery sales and a temporary office at 5102 Davis Boulevard. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating get_ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance" DirtC1M Page 1 of V) , J ~§ ~ '-1 ~ -j S --H U a: _. . .----.- W ~ ::£ o U e \ UN .---.....--.. M', e 1 ttV K r..., , ......JV C'-, .: L--_ ~ ~ ¡f -~ <,.....0- ~~K\J ~~~ ~ ;->ì ~:':7 3. :: :.._ ...... o N It) --.--... ....--.-. --. .. - ..-.... _.. ----..- i" 13;." T- oN i \ G,; , \ 5\ ) ~ ~ c ----.- D I 1:4 ¡ l- ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ,., ~21~' ;. L - .. 2 c::2 f'.' '.r, HARWOOO R :). i Í"g Z1' : 7ô]¿ ') '1'- N e - .....- .__.. . ! 2 c:;- . 1 9 ---~'--1-~ ! 3 ~ 4 ~ 7?n 1 'i'J) ì n~ :' . --.....,,- V) ~ 2· , ... ,-1-J--.--:----_,___ ~ 3 ¡ j . ! I ----~ 5 E ~ ! C? 4 2 7 tZ'> ,7ì?; . ðèð, 1$12 ; ~; 3 2 . V" <::::! r" I . I'ï I ._ ;---Vj o > -.J CD (J) H > ~ o 'ìn') S'í"f: 'oj b L ?n2.~¡' . --....'-r·----- .-.....- , "'- 13 :' " '¡!( -' e ~ .., ._:'15--- ~ ì¡"'-..:"',\...·...., :.i ~0 "'. ::. 11)' ~ 7 ~--~ - V' I e 0 c; , . ---.-- r--'-r'---'-r --"- , I ~: i ~ .: ~ 5 i ~ E ¡ 125 1)72/ 71l<) "'yr- TM 13~~ 20 -~- TF\ 13~ '" -T ~ I . .. . .. ")~o 'ì ')?Jl "),/1(.7('(,,): '3ê 6 'I 1 I I I . c; "'. 7" ". . 1 . 2; 3 : .; . v I. r. _L__~____. _ ,..__. __ .:........_ 0_ _._._., _..,_. r"l1 'll't ? E r¡7o =3 1ì2A- '0 _ ,:, ...~ fL, n C1 þ_ v. - ,r';¡ t? PZ 98-36 - Agenda Item # ;J . - - ': '?J} ,... ~ "ç 17"- , " I~ f ¡lo'd 7 r I~ ',7 7Z:J 7 '" l ~ '7 Î ? ~ ."' f ,? e e e ORDINANCE 2332 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TO REPEAL SPECIAL USE PERMIT NUMBER TWENTY-TWO FOR A GARDEN CENTER AND TRUCK RENTAL FACILITY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance Number 2040 on March 27, 1995 to authorize a Special Use Permit for a Garden Center and Truck Rental Facility on property located at 5102 Davis Boulevard, being Lot 18C, Block 18, Clearview Addition; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map to repeal said Special Use Permit as set forth herein; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THA T, in Case Number PZ 98-36, Ordinance Number 2040, passed and approved by the City Council on March 27, 1995 which authorized Special Use Permit Number Twenty-Two for a Garden Center and Truck Rental Facilty is hereby repealed. Nursery sales, truck rental and a temporary office shall no longer be permitted until a new special use permit has been approved for this location by the City Council. 2. THA T, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein. 3. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. Ord, 2332 Page 1 4. e EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. e e RECOMMENDED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 27th DAY OF AUGUST 1998 TO REPEAL ORDINANCE NUMBER 2040 AND THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A GARDEN CENTER AND TRUCK RENTAL FACILITY AT 5102 DAVIS BOULEVARD. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1998. Mayor Charles Scoma City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas [J APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Ord. 2232 Page 2 e e e 7. PZ 98-36 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TO REMOVE THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING NURSERY RETAIL SALES AND TEMPORARY OFFICE AT 5102 DAVIS BOULEVARD APPROVED Mr. LeBaron explained that this request is to simply remove the SUP that was granted for OK Sod. Since this business has moved, the City would like to repeal the special use permit. By deleting the SUP, any future landscape business would have to apply for a new SUP. Chairman Davis opened the public hearing. Seeing no proponents or opponents, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Wood, seconded by Mr. Blue, moved to approve PZ 98-36. The motion carried with a vote of 6 - O. Messrs. Wood, Bowen, Davis, Laubacher, Blue and Lueck were in favor of this request. Page 5 8/13/98 P & Z Minutes ~ ) ORDINANCE NO. 2040 COpy e AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS, AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO AUTHORIZE SPECIAL USE PERMIT NUMBER TWENTY-TWO FOR A GARDEN CENTER AND TRUCK RENTAL FACILITY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the following recommendation is submitted to the City Council of the City of North Rich/and Hills, Texas, by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by authorizing Special Use Permit Number Twenty-Two, by changing said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HilLS, TEXAS: 1. THA T, Special Use Permit Number Twenty-Two be hereby authorized for a Garden Center and Truck Rental Facility as set forth in Case Number PZ 95-01 on the property described as follows: Being Lot 18C, Block 18, Clearview Addition, an Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, according ., the plat recorded in Volume 388-21, Page 46, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located at 5102 Davis Boulevard. 2. THAT, the development regulations contained in the C-2 Commercial zoning district of Ordinance 1874 shall govern development on said property, except where amended below: 1. Not more than two (2) rental trucks shall be parked in front of the fence on Davis Boulevard. 2. Not more than four (4) pallets of grass shall be located in front of the building. 3. The temporary office trailer shall be limited to a maximum of four-hundred forty square feet (440) in size. 4. The temporary office trailer shall be reconsidered by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council eighteen (18) months after approval. 5, A permanent sight-barring fence of at least six (6) feet in height shall be provided along this property's entire frontage on Davis Boulevard, The area In front of the screening fence shall be landscaped with photinias and/or ot-her shrubs or trees. 6. Outdoor seas~nal sales shall be allowed and may include Christmas trees and pumpkins, 3. ~AT, all the regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance No, 1874, as amended, which are not in conflict .h the terms of this Special Use Permit, shall remain in full force and effect regarding this property ~ 4. a3EVERABILlTY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, ~aragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause. sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 5, EFFECTIVE DATE, This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9TH DAY OFFEBRUARY, 1995 $uø4Á Chairman, Plan .ecretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 1995. ATTEST: ~~ Mayor City of N h Richland Hills, Texas ~ä~Æ~~ I Secretary Ity of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _ __ ' , ,,' , //' -~-_.--- 1ê ~~ (//'7/ -'T'-7' /1---/, .~;,' //',/ ì ,I! (//./ Ví/ /., L--/ . ~ ;/,/./ tjtornéy for the City Ordinance No, 2040 Page 2 vUL-~O-~O JUC ¡é.JJ P. 01/01 e 5125 DAVIS BLVD. · FT WORTH. IX 7618ú . PHONE: 817-656-4354 . FAX: 817-656-0249 HAMM & ASSOCIATES RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL RBA.L EST A ìE DEVELOPMENT [ FAXTRANSMIITALj To: Barry LeBaron City of North Richland Hills 656-7538 Date: July 28, 1998 Fax #: Pa¡:es: 1 including Û1Ì:i L"QVcr sheCl From: Alan W. H&nm Subject: Special Use Permit Blk. 18C, ClcMVÌew Addn, 5102 Davis Blvd, COMMENTS: I agree with the City on the termination of the special we permit for lh~ above referenced propcrty, e Thank you fu( your counesy in this matter. Best regarù:s, ~~ e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department Planning & Inspections Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 SubjectRequest of Rob Adams for a Final Plat of Lots 1 R & 2, Block 6, Agenda Number: PS 98-30 Tapp Aadltlon. (LOcated at Ö4U1 Nt: Loop 820) Rob Adams of Adams Consulting Engineers has been retained by Wal-Mart to prepare the plat needed for the expansion of the current Wal-Mart. The major portion of the property is zoned C2- Commercial with a smaller portion zoned 1-2 Medium Industrial. The property contains 26.9 acres of land. The Planning and Zoning Commission on June 11, 1998 approved the Preliminary Plat. The issues associated with this plat are as follows: 1. Drainage: This development includes construction of two detention ponds on site to supplement existing storm drainage facilities. The Public Works Department is agreeable with this approach for handling storm drainage. 2. Sanitary Sewer: The developer is extending all necessary sanitary sewer service to accommodate the proposed development. Sewer lines for the development are private and will be owned and maintained by the property owner. 3. Water: The water lines in Industrial Blvd. and along Loop 820 Frontage Road are being extended by the developer in accordance with Public Works design criteria. Visibility Easements: The applicant has agreed to provide the necessary visibility, sidewalk, and utility easements at the intersection of Boulder and Industrial Park. 5. Driveway Spacing: The applicant has been advised that all proposed drives on the 820 Frontage Road must be approved by the State. 6. Sidewalks: During the Preliminary Plat the Planning and Zoning Commission waived the sidewalk requirement adjacent to the 820 Frontage Road. Sidewalks are existing adjacent to Boulder Drive. The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this item at its August 27, 1998 meeting and recommended approval, waiving the sidewalks on the frontage of NE Loop 820. RECOMMENDA TION: To approve PS 98-30, waiving the sidewalks on the frontage of NE Loop 820. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ 'Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Flnance- DlteC10r Page 1 of jl_~L-- _=.JT~ r '''l.r·l [-. i ; t, I 'e:¡ Iii i '1 II J:4'Y l_ - 1--- L._ r:] " I ,I I :; if ¡¡ " II e · \\-P ~v r ~1 .:, ¡If -!r.~' ~::'~~~'~I~~r- ~~:··I II \\ ) !I' \ \ R, I '~i\t lv ..... II "-I II ~~i ~. II , U ·Jkll , \ ¡"1I "~+L iì,~ .. \1 II ·;·"l·,"n -I i . II :, ~I II II II ..HI! ...../ II e~lull _.~.-cr-~ / l \ .' r I) 1 I. ~ :P. -f.''} I' ~,.,'~.~'~/ , " , , ~ (j , tJ // 17/1 / PD,I~ '\", / .' ,........~.., ()\\" ("~., .~'. >~W\~:,~" W.7· II II II n II R·],MF - --' - . .-- - -..- .- -- ~. <., ,n·1, u . - -.--- ·'''i:'i':~.ïr ! I I 1:1 1! ~ ,: I, R·]·Mf .::..=:.s:.~.1::~:.::'.:...~_,:. .:'..__:' Co] /' " u -- .' : ~ W 'C " L-oo P 8,2-0 NiE.· u -~:;/ -,' ] C'1 _.. .. . 0·-- .' j ¡ ........ i:/ . On j/O.__. 1/ . ./' .. fl ., /. i' 'i " !. .-- .. .~_.: !h..·.·~:.; ...~~~ ¡ i¡ . ! ~ PU·7 .-- -'" - - .'~=;:::;~;_/ ( ;(~~-'!~~U!!.llt~'-:-i (..."5':- L:)'''' ":~:J .". ......',..- ,: ~"\\ .~...., I ., , .'. " .' - ~:::'C,,, \\".." .-.' ! ' j I R' ('\ ' : .,\W.l \~: C-;Y'\\ \, , : I'! .' ....._..... '''.,': \ \" ....('1.... ,\ \-., :1 ...- - . --.J _ \':~:, )-..?-,'b ',-,: '\\"'" ¡' ! i .. .. ''';~:'- ,.\\ II : I' " t~} . J I ." ! ¡ ( , ,: ¡i ~ : ~ } ~: ." PS 98-30 ZONING EXHIBIT I _ _I.~", ..! : ¡ ¡ , 1¡' ':1 c-, I:; W· '" "I/II\ ~r , .i ;._ :I! . ~ ,7 ,I J e e e 5. PS 98-30 REQUEST OF ROB ADAMS FOR A FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1 RAND 2, BLOCK 6, T APP ADDITION. (LOCATED AT 6401 NE LOOP 820) APPROVED Mr. Davis explained that this property is the site of the Wal-Mart expansion and asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Don Craig, Adams Consulting Engineers, presented this request, stating that they have agreed with all the engineers' comments. Mr. LeBaron stated that the property carries two different classifications and the Commission might consider changing the zoning to all be consistent. Mr. Adams stated they would have no problem with a city initiated zoning change for clean up purposes. Mr. Nehring, seconded by Mr. Bowen, moved to approve PS 98-30. The motion carried with a vote of 7 - O. Messrs. Nehring, Bowen, Blue, Laubacher, Davis, Wood & Miller were in favor of this request. Page 3 8/27/98 P & Z Minutes e -0 v{ / ~. / \.-6: L-t Q ""'..'''''' ,.,;;.' '-" '-' ."1 -=- '-I L- I. t:.. N I.." ! Nt:. t:.1"(:::' ~ J." -:-" ~ f 0 f .L t". ':.:0'.::. .~ ADAMS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. CIVIL · ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS MEMORANDUM TO: Ms, Julia W. Skare, P.E., Staff Engineer (City of North Richland Hills) FROM: Jimmy Lopez SUBJECT: Response to Comments dated July 17, 1998 PS98-30; TAPP ADDITION; Block 6, Lot 1R & 2; Final Plat DATE: August 19. 1998 In response to your comments dated July 17, 1998, the following is a list that corresponds to your comments: 1. Drainaae Analysis: Detention Calculations were faxed to Mr. Kevin Miller on August 11, 1998. An analysis on the existing underground storm system was submitted on July 31,1998. 2. Adiacent Proøerty: Marshall Lancaster & Associates. Inc. submitted a copy of the deeds along with the revised Plat on July 31, 1998. Sanitary Sewer: The Sanitary Sewer line servicing the building is private; therefore, no easement is réquired, Water Line: The 12- water line in Industrial Park Blvd, has been extended to the south property line of Lot 2. The 12" waterline in the frontage road has been extended to the Wal-Mart west Property Line, Utility Easements: There are no new proposed Water Meters or Detector Check Vaults planned for this expansion, Sanitary Sewer lines are private, but water is considered Public Changes were made on the resubmitted Plat. Abandoned Easements: Forms will be completed upon plan approval. Drainaae Easements: The majority of the Storm Sewer is now Private; therefore, easements are not required on these lines. Please refer to the revised Proposed Grading Plan for storm sewer that is in an easement. Storm sewer calculations are on the plan, referenced in NOTE 1. Fire Hvdrant: Fire Hydrant coverage is shown on the Proposed Utility Plan. 9. Off Site Gradlna: The adjacent property owner agreed to grant permission to Wal-Mart; however, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. is in the process of purchasing the adjacent property for construction of a Sam's VVholesale Club. Purchase of the property should be completedlfinalized early next week. Once the property is purchased the notarized letter will no e longer be necessary. __ - . '" ,.., I """,""'-I-J '-''-JI';'':''-JL- I. t:. f'; I...JI ! Nt:.t:.I"<~ Öo!, ..:.~:;o '01.1 r . ~..,;. . . ~. Vi!i!¡ilitv Eas......nt: The easements have been added to the plans and have been reflected on the Plat submittal as well. e ~ Ea~.m.nt Dedication: The easement dedication has been shown on the Final Plat submittal 'V2. ROW Dedication: We now show dimensions from back of curb to the ROW line, ¿ Drivewav Spacina: We have submitted a drawing (Driveway Plan) to show driveway spacing, ~. TXeOT Permit: Forms will be completed upon plan approval. J5/ Zonina: The current zoning has been shown on the Plat submittal. ~/ Sianatures: The appropriate Signatures have been shown on the Plat submittal along wilh the surveyors seal and signature block. \Y' Signature Blocks: The Signature Blocks for the Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Mayor have been shown on the Plat submittal. V1â. Sidewalks: Are already in place from the West side of Boulder to the South side of Boulder. We are asking that the sidewalk requirement be omitted on loop 820 Frontage Road as previously agreed to by P & Z. ~ Street liahtlno: Existing street lights &re shown on the Proposed Site Plan. The legend now depicts the correct light symbol. e We trust that all of your comments have been addressed as you outlined. If you have any additional comments or questions, please feel free to call. œ I ,~~ ~ : ~ Œ ill ',1 PlANNING & INSPECTIONS e CITY OF N*RTH RICHLAND HILLS e Public Works July 17, 1998 MEMO TO: Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning and Inspection Services FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E., Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS98-30; TAPP ADDITION; Block 6, Lot 1 R & 2; Final Plat We have reviewed the plans submitted to this office on June 26,1998 and the plat submitted on June 29, 1998. The following items are for your consideration. DUE TO QUANTITY AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ITEMS, WE FEEL THAT THIS PLAT SHOULD NOT BE PLACED ON AGENDA FOR P & Z CONSIDERATION. 1. DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The calculations submitted with the construction plans did not include detention calculations. These calculations will need to be submitted with the next submittal or review will be suspended. The calculations show the 1 O-year frequency storm underground. Capacity of the existing system will need to be verified if additional runoff is getting to this area. The capacity of the existing bar ditch will need to be verified. e 2. ADJACENT PROPERTY The owner of the adjacent property, as listed in the TAD records is not Retail Asset Management. A copy of the deed records from Tarrant County indicates the owner is Skeeter & Bucky, L.P. The most current owner of the property needs to be listed on the plat. 3. SANITARY SEWER A portion of the existing system is not shown to be contained in an easement. If this is the case, this is a private system and the extension of the sanitary sewer main will be considered private. If the existing sanitary sewer main is contained in an easement, the volume and page of the easement shall be shown and the sanitary sewer main extension will need to be in a dedicated easement. 4. WATER LINE The 12" water line located in Industrial Park Boulevard will need to be extended to the south property line of Lot 2. This is to provide water service to this lot and provide for future extension of the water line. The 12" water line in the Frontage Road will need to be extended west to the new west property line. This will provide for future extension of the water line. e P.o. Box 820609 . North Richland Hills, Texas· 76182·0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 . 817-581-5521 . FAX 817·656-7538 e 5. UTILITY EASEMENTS All proposed water meters and detector check vaults have not been shown on the plans. These will need to be contained in an easement. This shall be included on the next plat and plan submittal. Service lines for water and sanitary sewer are private and easements should not be included on the plat for these improvements. 6. AB~NDONED EASEMENTS There are several water line and utility easements, which need to be vacated by separate instruments. Easement abandonment forms will need to be signed by all utility companies. 7. DRAINAGE EASEMeNTS All storm drain improvements shall be contained in drainage easements. The location and need for these easements cannot be finalized until additional calculations have been submitted to and reviewed by Public Works. 8. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrant coverage is required for the entire 2 lots. Sufficient information has not been provided to verify adequate fire hydrant coverage. Fire hydrants located on the opposite side of a 40-foot street may need be considered for fire hydrant protection. 9. OFF SITE GRADING All off site grading requires an easement or a notarized letter of permission from the adjacent property owner. If an easement is dedicated the capacity of the easement needs to be verified. If a letter is provided it will need to reference the appropriate sheet in the approved construction plans. e 10. VISIBILITY EASEMENT As previously stated, the intersection of Boulder Drive and Industrial Park Boulevard will require a visibility, sidewalk and utility easement as defined in the Design Manual. The easement needs to be clearly indicated on the next Plat submittal. 11. EASEMENT DEDICATION The attached easement dedication needs to be incorporated into the closing paragraph after the metes and bound's description on the Final Plat submittal. 12. ~OW DEDICATION The distance from the back of curb to the ROW line for all perimeter streets shall be shown on the site plan to determine if adequate parkway has been dedicated. 13. DRIVEWAY SPACING The distance between driveway approaches and street intersection shall be shown on the site plan. The proposed driveway approach for Lot 2 needs to be clearly shown on the plans. The location of Combs Road and the access to Interstate loop 820 needs to be located on the site plan. - e e e 14. TXDOT PERMIT All 'WOrk in the Loop 820 Frontage Road requires a permit from TxDOT. Separate permits for the driveway approaches and storm drain improvements are required. The permit application shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval prior to being forwarded to TxDOT. 15. ZONING The current zoning needs to be clearly indicated on the face of the plat. This includes the proposed lots and the adjacent lots. 16. SIGNATURES The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication on the Final Plat. In addition, the surveyor's seal and signature needs to be included on the mylar of the Final Plat. 17. ßIGNATURE BLOCKS The Subdivision Ordinance requires signature blocks for the Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Mayor. Examples may be found in the Subdivision Ordinance. These signature blocks must be added to the plat. 18. SIDEWALKS The Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. The sidewalks along the frontage roads were waived during the Preliminary Plat. All existing and proposed sidewalks along Industrial Park Boulevard and Boulder Drive will need to be clearly shown on the construction plans for coordination purposes. It is important to have the sidewalks shown on the street plans so that the utilities will not be constructed to interfere with the future sidewalk. 19. STREET LIGHTING Street Lighting is required by Section 1-06 of the Design Manual. The locations of any existing streetlights need to be clearly shown on the topographical drawing or site plan to confirm compliance with current ordinances. Any additional streetlights that may be required based on current ordinances, needs to be coordinated with Public Works and TU Electric. The developer will pay the cost for installation of any additional streetlights directly to TU Electric. There are numerous comments regarding the engineering and construction plans. These comments are recorded on a set of blueline construction plans. A letter has been included with the review outlining the items to be addressed. The plans are available for the Engineer to pick up. The comments contained herein do not purport to e e - relinquish the design engineer of their responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans. The City's eventual approval of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. JWS/csb/pwrn98160 cc: Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director Greg W. Dickens, P.E., Public Works Director /.- i r-. ( NRH APPLICATION FOR A FINAL PLAT City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 817-581-5500 (Please print or type all reSl'Onses) Proposed Subdivision Name: Ta Addition Lot 1-R and 2 Cu"entLegaIDescripûon: Block 6 Name and Address of Cu"ent Property Owner: Walmart stores, Inc. 2001 S.E. 10th street Bentonville, AR 72712 Phone No. (50 1) 277 - 7 7 0 0 Name and Address of Previous Owner:(if purr::hased during last twelve months) 6401 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, 76180 Name and Adcress of Developer: Walmart Stores, Inc. Phone No. (5 0 1) 2 7 7 - 7 7 0 0 Name and Acdress of Engineer: Adams Consulting Engineers,Inc. 2445 E. South lake Blvd. Ste 100 Southlake,Texas 76092 Phone No. (8 1 7) 3 2 9 - 6 9 9 0 Type of Development Being Proposed: o SF Residential o Duplex Residential o MF Residential GCJ Commercial/Industrial o Other 5. County plat filing fee: ~58. 00 Application Fee: 1. Application Fee 2. Number of residential lots @ S 1.50 per lot: 3. Number of non-residential/ots @ S5.00 per acre $ 1 35 . 00 4. Number of street intersection signs @ S65.00 each $120 00 TOTAL FEE $313.00 I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the property descnbed above and do hereby submit this Final Plat to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration, Date: c,. 19. ~a Applicant's Phone No: (8 1 7) 3 2 9 - 6 9 9 0 For Walmart ~~ 11 $g".w~ t!:;. ~ L1Q." Print Name: G. Robert Adams OFFICE USE ONLY Taxes Paid liens Paid Assessments Paid FINAL PLAT CD - 402 (2/96) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning & Inspections Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 Subject:Request of John Barfield for a Replat of Lot 1, Block 1 Agenda Number: PS 98-34 And Lot 1 Ö, tjlOCK L, I hornbndge estates AddItIon, Phase 5. (Located at 8933 and 9001 Thornway Drive) John Barfield is the owner and developer of the Thornbridge Subdivision. Thornbridge Phase 5 was originally platted in September 1997. Bramble Lane was originally platted to provide access to future phases of Thornbridge. However, since that time Mr. Barfield has sold the property to the north and will no longer be extending Bramble Lane with any additional Thornbridge development. Additionally, the property to the north is zoned C 1-Commercial and deleting Bramble Lane will prevent unnecessary commercial traffic through the Thornbridge Subdivision. The right-of-way for Bramble Lane is being replatted as a drainage and utility easement with the approval of this repJat. The issues associated with this replat are as follows: 1. Sidewalks: The developer has been advised that sidewalks are a requirement adjacent to all public streets. Since Bramble Lane will no longer exist as a result of this plat, sidewalks will be required only adjacent to Thornway Drive. The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this request at its August 13, 1998 meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDA TION: To approve PS 98-34. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Aev.) Operating ~et _ Other [£) I - Departme t Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance'" Oir.cto~ Page 1 of e ¡ 0 l6RO~;;@ j1 /òV II? )......... cØJ V 3A30 t<:J oU 'Qj~ ,., =) / / / ~ -(I \ \/ '- ----.-- _. H" oJ'· :.: .... .:.t . r. . '# '0 , ... . . ~ I . . ';.p .. .. . ~ ' ; ~r--¡ .' ., ~ .' I " ~ ~ .. "'; !!. ~ ::~ :;:\:. :7 ; ~ ' ': ""f'\)oi;J.\ :: n -: Cf) v '~ : ~ ; :--~-=---_.- ~:-. ..~ 2~1---' ~i~ ¡i~,~:, : .~·v··~ ... . 1..t .' \..!.J.... .: j~:._.: J: ,~ 15 . ~, ~ .",., ; 24 \,: : ~ ~.f\ 7 : : U~::.: ., ' .. ~:'.:'.: . 0..' . ...,. .. .:.::._-==--:: - -:.. _:.:. .. "'-1 , .... .. ,. . . " % ; ¡ , ., Z ' . = ! ~ ~ ~: ------- , , 76 rl: ':.:;,: .~ :. ,:IS: " , ;-., .., ....... :. 3 "WO~ ", \ . \t:;~ .~_.._- " .~ :-, 3 a: ~ rì .. ..-- n . .' 75 ,,' ~ ! : . ICU , -... ¡ ,....: ., æ ~.' :~ 0;- ;..... 66 \.:!.) '¡ -ff'\'w... . tSJ " ---- :." "of, : 6J '69 ;: , Q : , ~.) lso;" .. ; \1) "'" 1I.S .,' ~ ). 'J·U ,~ .~ PS 98-34 e Agenda Item # uw~n ~ LOn~~~Ssocla~es 817 2814334 P.02 e Owen D. Long and Associates, Inc. CONSULTING ENO'NEERS August 5,1998 Mrs. JUlia W. Skare, P.E. Staff Engineer City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 North Richland Hills, Texas Re: PS98-34 THORNBRIDGE ADDITION Phase V Block 2, Lot 16R and Lot lR Replat. North Richland Hills, Texas Dear Julia; We have received a copy of your memo dated July 21, 1998 addressed to the Planing and Zoning Commission regarding the captioned Replat. We have the following comments. 1. The 50 ft. R.O.W, previously shown as Bramble Lane will be revised to be shown as a 50 ft. drainage and utility easement. e 2. The two 25 ft. private access and drainage and utility easements will be revised to dr~inage and utility easements. 3. The G.P.S. coordinates will be verified to be NAD83 Texas State Plane Coordinates. 4. The 20 ft. front building setbacks will be revised to 25 ft. building lines for these two lots as well as the adjacent lots. 5, The appropriate signatures will be added to the Final Plat prior to the mylars being submitted to the city. 6. The title block will be revised as requested. 7. The sidewalks and driveways will be revised. Additional comments on the marked up construction plans will be addressed and the marked~~§-~~Will be returned to. the Public Works Dept. If you have a~~t~ omments, Please g1ve me a call. ~ ) ~ ~ RECEIVED~. ~ r(j ~ o AUb b 1..1,,0 c:; Mark D. Long, P.E. e cc. cc. cc. e e e CITY OF N@RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works July 21, 1998 MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E., Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS98-34; THORNBRIDGE ADDITION, PHASE V; Block 2, Lot 16R and Block 6, Lot 1 R; Replat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on June 29, 1998. The following items are for your consideration. 1. PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT The 50-foot ROW previously shown as Bramble Lane is now shown to be a private access easement with variable width paving. This needs to stay dedicated as ROWand the street constructed according to the Public Works Design Manual criteria or it needs to be shown as a 50-foot drainage and utility easement. If it is platted as a drainage and utility easement, a minimum flume shall be constructed over the storm drain system for overflow. Construction plans are required with the next submittal for this option. 2. EASEMENTS The two (2) 25-foot private access, drainage and 'utility easements should be shown as a drainage and utility easement. 3. GPS COORDINATES Subdivision Regulations require all new plats be tied by survey to the GPS. The Final Plat needs to include the NAD83 Texas State Plane Coordinates for at least two property corners. The coordinates need to be determined by a survey tied to the City's GPS monuments. The original plat for Thornbridge Addition, Phase V should have shown NAD83 coordinates. Future plat reviews will be suspended if the correct GPS coordinates are not shown. 4. BUILDING SETBACK The current zoning regulations allow for a 20-foot building line setback. This has been shown on the plat. The plat for the adjacent lots shows a 25-foot building line setback. 5. SIGNATURES The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication on the Final Plat. In addition, the surveyor's seal and signature needs to be included with the mylars of the Final Plat. P.O. Box 820609 . North Richland Hills, Texas. 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820· 817-581-5521· FAX 817-656.7538 e e e 6. TITLE BLOCK The title block needs to be revised as shown on the marked up set of plans. 7. SIDEWALKS The Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. The sidewalks will need to be added to the construction plans for these two lots if the ROW is not retained. There are a few comments regarding the engineering and construction plans. These comments are recorded on a set of blueline construction plans. These plans are available for the Engineer to pick up. The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer of their responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans. The City's eventual approval of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. ¿~~J~. Jt£cv_~ J"'{t/smm/pwm9816J cc: Greg Dickens, P.E., Public Works Director Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director NRH (Pie... print or type .u mponaes) APPLICATION FOR A REPLAT City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 620 North Richland Hills. Texas 617-561-5500 e Proposed Subdivision Name: LÖF [¿;> 7 Current Legal Description: \...c. r (. 1-:' L. D c. t:.. ...... La T I ;3.... o=.t.. Name and Address of CUffent Property Owner. $' R.... PL.)<v - PÅ~~' i!.l.,. ~ ,~ï (vt> J-.l~2.A)DO? ~ol9-.J>. }.)¿J~Sì) ~'i-4,;;> )bO!;'-/ /¿ 1<, 1-< ./ ß¿o c< ';¡. ,j$¿or:.):: J /#0 KAJ,ð.,é 1l/6- ¿ ,;ðij¡t1."S.E J/ THe> jZ.-J b,J!..1 ):;>6 :i ?HP~ F V V¿.cJìUJ2. F Phone No, SJ7 )~b ¡-~Òb C> Name and Address of Previous Owner.(if purchased during last twelve months) ~4~ 1? Name and Address of Developer. S"A-rK.-E. Phone No. Name and Address of Engmeer. t)t.Þ> é;v P. L 000 Þ- \(.15 PRE. C,r' c., blu R..~ T..... )" e;, H':> ~ Å~<>.L> c:.. ~)'-e$ ).v<:... L,-.1 ¿ ~ð~~ ~~~~~ 1(\(" 16. D $'"'1 Phone No. !tn) l.Õ/- ß/<"'I Type of Development Being Proposed: E6I SF Residential 0 MF Residential o Duplex Residential 0 Ccmmercialllndustrial o Other Application Fee: 1. Application Fee 2. Number of residentiallols @ S 1.50 per lot: 3. Number or non-residential lots @ $5.00 per acre 4. Number or street intersedion signs @ $65.00 each 5. County plat filing~ I ~o _ 0 C> 3. c. ~ 5'9- . 0 0 TOTAL FEE ~ I ð/ .0"- ~- Date: -:r c...M .¡J I hereby certify that I am. or represent. the legal owner of the property described above and do hereby submit this Replat to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration, (Attach affidavit with al/ property owner's names when more than one owner involved.) 2-" 6 , /9,61 , Applicant's Phone No,: " ~ Print Name: .:::r;;n AI W. 8.ßJ ¡: I GJ...I) Signature: OFFICE USE ONLY se Number -16 C)lò·1t-f Taxes Paid Liens Paid Assessments Paid REPLAT CD - 403 (2196) e 4. PS 98-34 PUBLIC HEARING TO C~ER THE REQUEST OF JOHN BARFIELD FOR A REPLAT OF LOT 1, BttICK 1 AND LOT 16, BLOCK 2, THORN BRIDGE ESTATES PHASE 5. (LOCATED AT 8933 AND 9001 THORNWAY DRIVE) APPROVED Mr. LeBaron explained that this property is being replatted in order to remove Bramble Lane. Staff recommends that the access easement be removed from the plat. Chairman Davis opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Doug Long presented this request. He explained that they are removing Bramble Lane because they will not be extending the Thornbridge Addition to the north. Having no additional proponents or no opponents, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Wood, seconded by Mr. Laubacher, moved to approve PS 98-34, deleting the private access easement from the plat. e The motion carried with a vote of 6 - O. Messrs. Wood, Laubacher, Lueck, Blue, Bowen and Davis were in favor of this request. e Page 2 8/13/98 P & Z Minutes CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department Planning & Inspections Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 SubjectRequest of Matt Speight for a Replat to be known as Lots Agenda Number: PS 98-35 1 K1 & 1 KL, tjlock 3U, Holiday North Addition, Section 8 (Located in the 5500 Block of Davis Boulevard) J.B. Sandlin is the property owner and Matt Speight is the agent in this replatting case. This property contains 7.3 acres and was originally platted as one large parcel several years ago and is currently zoned C2-Commercial. A Special Use Permit was approved by the City Council for a self-storage mini-warehouse facility in 1995. The Self-Storage facility was constructed on the site behind the frontage along Davis Blvd. Mr. Sandlin is now in the process of selling the Davis Blvd. frontage and wants to create a commercial lot for a future user. The proposed replat will divide the property into two lots and create a 1.6 acre commercial parcel between Davis Blvd. and the existing mini- warehouse structure. The issues associated with this replat are as follows: 1. Drainage: This property has been previously platted. There are approved grading plans for the lot. The developer has been advised that the approved plans are acceptable to the Public Works Department if; the site is constructed by March 1999 and that the site design and building layout does not significantly change. If these conditions are not met, then the site must be re- engineered. 2. Utility Plans: Again, there are approved utility plans for the property. The developer has been advised that these plans are acceptable to the Public Works Department if; the site is constructed by March 1999 and that the site design and building layout does not significantly change. If these conditions are not met, then the site must be re-engineered. 3. Sidewalks: The NRH Parks Department is completing construction of a hike and bike trail in the TU Electric Easement. A portion of this trail runs adjacent to Davis Blvd. and in front of the property being platted. The developer has agreed to install a sidewalk in front of the mini- warehouse office when the new commercial center is constructed. The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this request at its August 27,1998 meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDA TION: To approve PS 98-35. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _Oth Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finan". DtreC1o; Page 1 of e e PS 98-35 e ." "--111:1' ~>, ,:: , L R ' ¡ ! ~',~>.,) i ! 1'1' ~,:,:,oJ.'~¡ C.2 ,,"·-k· I 1 83 4 I '.: I -"'''''4\'' , ,," / /, I ", .."..,.... rl "", \ \\.~. '...~:\.... _, ","\I .,-., 11;;~j;~~/'/'" .\. U n~ ~--=--:} \\.\"\\S\',~ ./ ; -, Q I " .. : I' .' ~i I // i ' V ' C·2 / I' .' ' :: II!" ,..:': 10 jl lh .,";;;;\fH'~~ \ ¡ ." v I 1382 .k , I / / \;.\·\ì ,,;\ ili ~, , I ' I .-,,'. ~---; . \ !. ;", ' .~2 '.~~~f~\~~~-·¡ " ,.- /' I 'I' :,' R-7-MF Pb·2D .204, ~ r.....('! . ,. Q Q Q Q } .. ',i c -, " Iii ';/ '" " ~ ~ . / 'i,"'~- '" Ji / --.:::::.-.-..._ :r ':-> ~-"-' ,',,',,: ';' ,~ I~' ......ì: Af t' ' . i -. '~.:.i C ~!.""lD-" I -'--. 111[ I· . :'7"3;:.~':1:' . --.-~..Sï'I:'o\\' '-;l'; : ~ : .... R-7 ,. i; ¡.. ! , r (.; ."'~::::~";" \ ri¡:':--f:-::=~:;=::---""- I 5. . I .~ - ~í D~,' '-'-:;:-=-:;-=j'f/-';'==¡--'; ~J2i=-~,1.-'~" " '! !, I I ' ' _ .~-".J--_.' . g, ¡ ¡.' ¡ . ¡ 4/' ~ .::~~'.i~Ei~~'::"': ñ,1 ~l~~._:.~·! '! ", ,:¡~, , "\ ~R"~~I".' o!. -'I~'::~~-~~~I: \ \ -: 2 ' '\ \. I' ,~.. ' . \ :1 ¡ ":-~\\. '.\ ; " : j , \\ " c :-,""~":L<Q - c\ . '\ - . .. ,.... ,,\' ~" ¡[~;:::..¡-;:: " . \ i.., ,I," :' .., \ \ ",... . I .....:" " i'·..;..-..::' \ T~':'^ \ '\" \" )/.",~,_,;f';~1 Ii I,....'....j , 1... " :'r LR L ~: I< 0( \.I L,,,. 'n" .. I; I; 'I' ,I , it: o \.\ ZONING EXHIBIT e e - 7. PS 98-35 REQUEST OF MATT SPEIGHT FOR A REPLA T TO BE KNOWN AS LOTS 1 R1 AND 1 R2, BLOCK 30, HOLIDAY NORTH ADDITION SECTION 8. (LOCATED IN THE 5500 BLOCK OF DAVIS BOULEVARD) APPROVED Matt Speight presented this request explaining that this is the property at the Davis Boulevard Self-Storage facility and is simply to facilitate a portion of the property to be sold. Mr. Speight said they have no problem with the 25' building line being added to the east side of the property, where it fronts Davis Boulevard. Mr. Wood, seconded by Mr. Miller, moved to approve PS 98-35, subject to the engineer's comments and the addition of a 25' building line on the east side of the property. The motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 - O. Messrs. Wood, Miller, Bowen, Davis, Laubacher, Nehring & Blue were in favor of this req uest. Page 5 8/27/98 P & Z Minutes CITY OF N$RTH RICHLAND HILLS e Public Works August 19, 1998 MEMO TO: Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning and Inspection Services FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E., Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS98-35; HOLIDAY NORTH; SECTION 8; Block 30, Lots 1 R & 2; Final Plat (Replat) We have reviewed the plat submitted to this office on July 2, 1998. The following items are for your consideration. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OUTSTANDING ITEMS, WE FEEL THAT THIS PLAT SHOULD NOT BE PLACED ON AGENDA FOR P & Z CONSIDERATION. 1. CONSTRUCTION PLANS Construction plans were approved for this site in March of 1996. The plans are approved for three years. Construction will need to begin by March of 1999 or new-engineered plans will need to be submitted for review. The owner has indicated his understanding with the attached letter. e 2. UTILITY EASEMENTS The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 7.5 foot Utility Easement on both sides of all water and sanitary sewer mains. The location of the existing sanitary sewer main shall be tied down by survey to verify the main is contained in the easement. The utility easement shall be revised to a 15-foot easement with 7.5 feet on each side of the main. The width, as well as the volume and page, for all existing easements need to be shown. 3. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS It appears a portion of the storm drain improvements, including inlets, are not contained in the drainage easements. The location of these improvements shall be tied down by survey and the appropriate easement dedicated with this plat. The width, as well as the volume and page, for all existing easements need to be shown. 4. ROW DEDICATION Davis Boulevard is designated as a P6D on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. This street requires a 120-foot ultimate right-of-way. The ultimate right-of-way requirement is total of 60 feet west of the existing centerline. e P.O. Box 820609 . North Richland Hills, Texas· 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820· 817-581·5521· FAX 817-656-7538 e e - The distance from the centerline of Davis Boulevard to the proposed subdivision shall be shown to determine the adequacy of right-of-way along the route and to determine if additional right-of-way is necessary to accommodate the proposed street. Sufficient iron pins shall be found and shown on the drawing together with dimensions to adequately describe all perimeter streets. 5. DRIVEWAY SPACING The location, width and curb return radii of the existing driveway has not been provided. This information is required to verify the location and width of the proposed access easement. The easement is labeled as private and will need to be revised to "Mutual Public Access Easement". 6. TXDOT PERMIT Any changes to the existing driveway approach or construction of an additional approach will require approval of the Public Works Department as well as a permit from TxDOT. 7. GPS COORDINATES Subdivision Regulations, Section 920, Paragraph B requires all new plats be tied by survey to the GPS. This will allow the City to keep the GIS up-to-date. The Final Plat needs to include the NAD83 Texas State Plane Coordinates for at least two property corners. The coordinates need to be determined by a survey tied to the City's GPS monuments. 8. ZONING The current zoning needs to be clearly indicated on the face of the plat. This includes the proposed lots and the adjacent lots. 9. BUILDING SETBACK Building setback lines need to be added for the proposed lots as well as the lots adjacent to this plat. Any permanent structures, which encroach any building setback lines and will remain after completion of the development, shall be shown on the drawing with appropriate dimensions per Section 920, Paragraph F of the Subdivision Regulations. 1 O. SIGNATURES The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication on the Final Plat. In addition, the surveyor's seal and signature needs to be included on the mylar of the Final Plat. 11. TITLE BLOCK The title block needs to be revised as shown. 12. LOT DESIGNATION The proposed lot designation Lot 1R1 needs to be changed to Lot 1 R. The proposed lot designation Lot 1 R2 needs to be changed to Lot 2. 13. ADDRESS The address and telephone number for the Engineer associated with the construction plans needs to be added to the Plat. e e e 14. SIDEWALKS The Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. The sidewalks will need to be included with the construction plans for coordination purposes. It is important to have the sidewalks shown on the street plans so that the utilities will not be constructed to interfere with the future sidewalk. The hike and bike trail is located in the State ROW north of the driveway approach. There are no sidewalks south of the driveway approach. This review was based on submitted plat. The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. cc: Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Public Works Director Kevin 8. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director e e e JamIIt/v Bomjxmie& 61 ¿J 7 0aoù Ç]Joaleoad 9;l'l C¡/b-rthy .:ft."Hl.f 7DI6>O 6>17/2cPI-¿JÓ'Q9 City of North RicWand Hills Planning and Inspection Services 7301 Northeast Loop 820 NRH, TX 76182-0609 Attention: Christopher D. Baker August 18,1998 RE: PS 98-35; Holiday North Addition Mr. Baker, This letter is to serve as acknowledgment that we are aware of the approved sets of drainage and utility plans for this property and that they will stay in effect tor three years from March 1996, We also understand that if the use and layout change from what is approved that the site must be re-engineered, At the present time we have no intention of changing the proposed use and layout. Therefore the currently approved plans may be used. Thank you for your help in this matter. O~\H RICry~ ~~ ~ !~ RECEIVED -;f. '1- " I 0 A U r' 1 ç. · , : [;:; j \ ü. , ...' I \ l '1-_ .J?! "Y1fu ~, 'frvr., P, 1S; . . '-~ .~. e Jamlltiv (j~ 6 1 ~ 7 0aoü ÇjJOtlleuard .9õttt C¡/b/ttllJ !7ë..r<u 7ôl&O &1 7/2&1-~6Q9 Barry LeBaron Director of Planning and Inspection Services City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 NRH, TX 76182-0609 August 21,1998 RE: PS98-35; Holiday North; Section 8; Block 30, Lots lR & 2; Final Plat (Replat) e Dear Barry, e We are in receipt of the comments memo dated August 19, 1998. We have reviewed the requested information with our surveyor, Bill Hooks, with Bransom Surveying. The requested fourteen items meet with are consent and we fully intend to comply with them and verifY that the plat includes the same. I hope this will expedite this replat. If you need any further assistance or information, please contact me. Thank you for your help. ~~~CerelY, \ ~~ Spelg t r e Jåadlt/b Bomjxtaie& 61 ¿¡ 7 Øao,Ù' ÇjJoa/e(f(l¡y/ /7õrt 1ftJl't/z, Ýé.r{u 7b1 &0 cPI7/2&I-cY(SQ9 July 2, 1998 Matt Speight will act as my authorized agent in the request for replat of Lots lRI & lR2, BLOCK 30, HOLIDAY NORTH, SECTION 8. An addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas ~' Owner e e e City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 817·581 ·5515 Application Type: ¡ ¡ Preliminary Plat Application for Subdivision Plat Approval Ni~H (Pleas. pml" re.peru..) , . Final Plat i¿<:l Replat ! Short Form LJAmended Plat Property Owner Information: Name of Property Owner: -:s .\3 , SP-N{)L\ 1\J 5 \ '"S 7 D A.i \ S \S\-\) Ù Phone No. 8n - '28l~ ~SO~ --- Address of Property Owner: City: N,Y<\~, State: ~ ì ~_ Zip: :7 b \ 8 0 Proposed Subdivision Name: No. of Acres in Plat: No. of Lots in Plat: 7. ~L.{_ 1- Name of Authorized Agent: Authorized Agent Information: "Note: An affidavit signed by the property owner is required when the agent is not the property owner" _lß-&.\\.SP~\_6}t\_PhOneNo. 8\î-'2S\- »1)9 ~: (, 05", . 0 '11 , -- . --- - ~ - - - - Address: -_.6j_1l__t)A\l \ ~_,'3$.~~.~_ -..---- --~__._. ____ ___on 0-_- ___ ________._ City: .-~j~Jl.._____. ..".. . State: >X Zip: 76:[ RO - .-.-.--.- -..- ---_...- Surveyor / Engineer Information: Name of Firm: L~J 'D_ J3ß~_SOVV\S\)R.\1E'1DR..S>\ )'NC, Address: l 0 '28 N of.2-1\\.. ~ \It.. \J A-N' 11 I\vE-. Phone No. 3(L~.B.3)Y_~17 City: _F_T,uJ. OR..,\:\,_,_....._ Contact Person: ß I )...J.......__1:+ PD '£. S ... _~. '?-,.!-_.._ State: ~ Zip: 76 iLL ..----. Plat Fee Calculation: All Preliminary Plats a, Application Fee: b. St,50 perresidentiallot or 55.00 per commercial acre: Total Fee: $120,00 All Reptats, Short Form Plats, and Final Plats a, Application Fee: $120,00 b, 5 t .50 per residential lot or 55,00 per commercial acre: c, 565,00 lor each street intersection: d, County plat filing lee: All Amended Plats a, Applicafjon Fee: b, County plat filing (ee: Total Fee: (none) -- S58.00 ' -- $58.00 .---. 558,00 . . Addifjonal filing (ees may be applicable (or oversize or extra documents. Total Fee: Time Waiver Request: (optional) The applicant is aware that action on this plat may not take place (or more than thirty (30) days and waIVes all tIme reqUirements (or approval o( the ptal. SIgnature: I certify that I am. or represent. the owner o( the property descflbed above and hereby submit this subdivisIon plJt 10 the City o( North Richland HiUs (or consideration, l~ ) - q 8 ~.-'--.- ._.._--_._.....~---- RECEIVED JUl - 2 1998 Your name (Printed Namej: _:s-, g,_L5Ð-~Ç)'\-~_____... __,_ Signature: Subdivision Plat Application 4 CD-418(1-98) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department Planning & Inspections SubjectRequest of Michael Rader for an Amended Plat of Lots 6 & 7, Block 4, Industrial Park Addition. (Located at 5619 Rufe Snow Drive) Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 Agenda Number: PS 98-41 Mr. Michael Rader is the owner of this two-lot subdivision, which was initially approved as a Final Plat on May 11, ,1998. The developer of one of the lots, Lot 6, is proposing the construction of a new lubrication center. The location of the building will extend into the five-foot utility easement, which is located along the south property line. The proposed amended plat deletes a portion of the five-foot utility easement where the proposed building will be placed on the lot. Staff is not opposed to the deletion of this portion of the five-foot utility easement since an additional ten-foot utility easement is located on the adjacent property to the south and is adequate enough to accommodate utility extensions to the west of these two lots. The Planning & Zoning Commission considered this request at its August 27, 1998 meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDA TION: To approve PS 98-41. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ _Other _ Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION Fin....." Dlrec:to; Page 1 of ;/ ----, TRACT 3A .568 @ 1 e tA0 1R1 ~'I IND- I') ~ 6700 ¿" ",r S- ßL..Kr ~ ~ .3 (,ç.s-I' ~ ; IJI£. ).. ~<l ~ TR 1836 :JO.O'('1AC- .J'~ ~ .'.¡..~y II? ,&~'t' ~/7 tv ùV v ,""" ~ .)I ,¥Þ- a< tJ",t ~.Þ ~ C'\ "" ill <ý(' ~pcJ ",-i I I, ~ ~ 18 - . ~ 5(.1> If .9134 @ . -. Q Q ~ 1A I Q 6700 5 Q ~ ~·IS""J'" I 4 I ~ ~ 18 ~ :> 1..1ø~1 2 3 ~ , 0 ~ ., BROWNING OR ~ '>I') If) - ex: øL. ~ c.'-4~ ~ IQ 6600 ~ 1A1Al A N I~ I lA-1A2 lA-18 CJ) pAR 2 I ~ :r W <:I 4A2 :r !3 )~ If) PS 98-41 e Agenda Item # TRACT " 1. 978 @ DA~ H \...1 SE DO - ... """ G§ '2. o , 19 R I ,,~~ ~ 4Al o e 8. PS 98-41 REQUEST OF MICHAEL RADER FOR AN AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 6 & 7, BLOCK 4, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION. (LOCATED AT 5619 RUFE SNOW DRIVE) APPROVED Mr. Davis explained that this amended plat is to alleviate a building line encroachment into an easement. They are simply deleting a portion of a 5' easement. All engineering comments have been agreed to. Mr. Wood, seconded by Mr. Nehring, moved to approve PS 98-41. The motion carried with a vote of 7 - O. Messrs. Wood, Nehring, Blue, Laubacher, Davis, Bowen and Miller were in favor of this request. e e Page 6 8/27/98 P & Z Minutes I ~ I C,.,.,: N~rt'1 Richland Hills ì301 N,E,lwp 820 Application for Subdivision Plat Approval Ni~H .'10M Ric.'1land Hills. TX 75180 817·581·5515 Application Type: ._..J Preliminary Plat (,~'U$l pmt,}ll flS;)OnSUI e : ,Final Plat '--....! ':Replat ! Short Form ended Plat Property Owner Information: Name or Property Owner: Ks.i S-ft;...II'~1íS __S:~ (9 f-vrJ?. 3^ov-J ilLC._,_.__.__, JJð~~~ R{ '~t.1<;.,~_~6 / RAJ.M..J-,~jl.'ÍA/..~ Phone No, ------ Address of Property Owner: - ------- City: Stale: y Zip: 7S... Proposed Subdivision Name: - /1 J IJsh<. I <¿, ) c..-</t o..J4 ,1,:::'"" No, of Acres in Plat: No of LoIs in Pia: 1- Yi . --- -- - .. 2. Authorized Agent Information: "Note: An affidavit signed by the property owner is required when the agent is not the property owner" Name 01 Authorized Agent: EIV ~ ¡¿. 5-^ I "fh --- --...--..---- .... --... ..-. - --...- Phone No, 972'158 -9~ b ) Address: !fì?-$ IVÆ! L~d ' _____ _.. J'lð / I.~.s ._ . ---- - ---- . ----.-- City ----...-- -- - ---- -..-.. --_.. State: Tx_ Zip:7SZY¥ "------ Surveyor / Engineer Information: Name of Firm: .f~I~~/(, _SU¡(lIe.þr~~_...o ..__ Phone No. 97 Z 'ì 0- / -öe:.;; :J --'-"'- --- Address' 1333 C~/{fc,<~-f~ O/l... ---... #- ¡co - -. - - City J:fu¡{~c¡ - - -- - State Tx Zip 'ì;£ o~ .8 -----.--. Contact Person: H u~ ~_ p~:'.I(.J<.. __ -.-----... ---_. ..---- _. - . ---. ---- Plat Fee Calculation: All Preliminary Plats a Applìca~cn Fee: /), S 1,50 per residential Jot or 55,00 per commercial acre Total Fee' S120C<J All Replats. Shorf Form Pia Is, and Final Plals a, ApplicallOn ;ee' 512000 /), 51.50 perresidenrìallor or $5,00 per commercial acre: c, 56500 lor ea:l1 street !n!ersecliCn: d COlJnty pia! fil1l19 lee, All Amended PIIIIS a, ApplìcalJon Fee: /), COlJnty plat filing fee: Total Fee: (non')) SS8,OO ' .-- S58,00 ~ '- S5800 . . AddlllOnal f¡{Ìflg lees may be a;:;/tCilble lor overSize or exlra rJocumenl$ To;al Fee Time Waiver Request: (optional) T.~e appfrcant IS aware that ac/lon on (!;/S "Iat may not take 1taee for more ~an Itllrly (301 days aM WaNeS aU !me reqlJlfements lor approval of the plat SiÇnature' I Cfmlt¡.'/1al Jar.!. or represent. t"'f! owner 01 th!l 1roperry described aOO"e and hereby submIt thIs SUb(jMSJon plat to me CIty 01 North Richtand Hills lor conS/derar>cn, Om, b' _2í'- '1 g -. -..----. -.----- -- Slena!:;re .~tµ_...__ ur name (Pnmed Name):. £¡( l Ç" I<.:S N\/Yt, Subdivision Plat Application " CO-418(1-98) 90-d S£SL9S9 LtS uo~~eJ~S~U~Wp~ Zd~Md H~N dSS:tO S6-Lt-6n~ =Kwlk e INDUSTRIES, INC. From design and construcr,'or: through servIce and suppi'es Kwik Kar OIL & LUBE 10 MIN, Oil CHANGE Kwik Kar LUBE & TUNE 10 MIN, Oil CHANGE Kwik Kar Wash SALES-SERvICE August 26,1998 City of North Riclùand Hills Attention: Christopher D. Baker; Planner Rc: 1.440 acres of land situated in thc City of North Richland Hills, and being a part of the Edmund M.D. King Survey, Abstract No. 892, Tarrant County. Texas, said 1.440 acres of land also being a part of that certain tract or parccl of land conveyed to Radcr Partners as recorded in Volumc 10922, Page 1816, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. To Whom It Concerns: This letter will serve notice it the City of North Riclùand Hills that Sid Hollingsworth. Engineering Coordinator for Kwik Industries. Inc. to havc "Power of Attorney" to Sign for: e the Application for and platting of the abovc referenced site for Kwik Kar Lube & Tune Centcr, engincering for the development & coordinating lime fmmes. representative for any and all steps required by the City of North Richland Hills foc a final approval to obtain a Building Pennit for a Kwik Kar Lube & Tunc Center, Sincerely. Gary R. Stallings (ACKNOWLEDGEMENT) The State of Texas County of"-A~¡(M1 BEFORE ME. the undersigned authority, in and for said County, Texas. on this day appeared G. A~~ R. 5.'ÍA/!,A,S known to me to be the person whose name subscribed to the rgomg mstrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the samc for the purpose and considemtion therein expressed. (seal) Notary Public, ~/l~ - ERIC R. SMITH Notafy P\JOI.c, SbM of T_ 1;., c:..~ ExpnI Nev. 6. 2aOt 4725 Nail Road Dallas Texas 75244 214-458-9761 1-800-442·5368 FAX 214-458-0948 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 Subject: Approval of 1998 Certified Tax Roll - Resolution 98-40 Agenda Number: GN 98-100 Tarrant Appraisal District has provided the City with the 1998 Certified Tax Roll information. This includes the most current appraisal information, exemptions for disabled veterans, persons over 65, homestead and disabled persons, abatement value losses, freeport inventory value loss and agricultural value losses. These values also include the new construction and the minimum value of properties still under protest to the Tarrant Appraisal Review Board. The certified values for the City of North Richland Hills are $1,961,435,474. This is the amount used to calculate the effective tax rate and property tax revenues for the fiscal year 1999 budget, and it is recommended to be certified and accepted by the City Council. Recommendation: To approve Resolution 98-40 and the Certified Tax Roll in the amount of $1,961,435,474 for the tax year 1998. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available ~<:>perating Budget _ ~.Jther _ VW ;t~AAAA J~~ , ~ ' J VVD;~rtrhent Head Signature , / / CITY COUNCIL ACTION itEM Flnanc" Dlrec1'; Page 1 of . . . RESOLUTION NO. 98-40 WHEREAS, the City Council of this City received the Ad Valorem Tax Rolls for the year 1998 from Tarrant Appraisal District in the amount of net taxable value of $1,961,435,474 including minimum value of properties pending disposition before the Appraisal Review Board; and WHEREAS, the City Council studied said Tax Rolls and approved same on September 14, 1998. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas that: 1. The approval of said Tax Rolls received from Tarrant Appraisal District in September 1998, be and is hereby ratified and said Tax Rolls shall collectively be considered the Tax Roll of this City for 1998 and it is hereby in all things adopted and approved. PASSED AND APPROVED the 14th day of September 1998. ATTEST: Charles Scoma - Mayor Patricia Hutson - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: L~~e~r of Finance CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 Subject: Authorizing Homestead, Over 65, and Disability Exemptions Agenda Number: GN 98-101 from Ad Valorem Taxes - Ordinance No. 2327 For the past several years the City Council has been granting various exemptions from Ad Valorem Taxes, and it is necessary for Council to again take action adopting these exemptions. The ordinance that is being proposed includes a 15% exemption for residential homestead, a maximum $29,000 exemption from assessed value on a residential homestead for persons over the age of 65, and a $29,000 exemption from assessed value of property owned by a disabled person where that property is exclusively used for homestead purposes. The proposed ordinance does not allow an exemption to be claimed for both the over 65 and the disability, and no homestead will be subject to both the over 65 and disability exemption. The proposed exemptions are the same as the prior year. These exemptions were anticipated in calculating the net taxable property value that is included in the certified tax rolls and calculating the effective tax rate for 1998. Recommendation: To adopt Ordinance No. 2327 providing for exemptions for homestead, over 65 years of age, and disability persons to be approved. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget _ Other _ 'd.n"AA/\. ~ ,~ V l7Vyv'~partment Head Signature / J CITY COUNCIL ACTION ttEM \ / Finan,," DIf.c1e; Page 1 of . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2327 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING RESIDENTIAL HOMESTEAD, OVER 65, AND DISABILITY EXEMPTIONS FROM AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE 1998 TAX YEAR. WHEREAS, the City Council determined the necessity for a residential homestead exemption and an over 65 exemption; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the special needs of disabled persons; NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: 1. There shall be exempt from the City Ad Valorem Taxes for the year 1998, fifteen percent (15%) (with a minimum of $5,000) of the assessed value of residential homestead within the City which is occupied by the owner as his homestead. 2. Persons over the age of 65 years, claiming an exemption pursuant to Ordinance No. 676 shall have a $29,000.00 exemption from the assessed value of a residential homestead. A person who is disabled within the meaning of Section 11.13 (m) of the Property Tax Code of the State of Texas, as of January 1 st of each year shall be entitled to $29,000.00 exemption from the assessed value of property owned by such disabled persons and used exclusively for homestead purposes by such disabled persons. No person may claim both the "over 65" exemption and the "disability" exemption and no homestead shall be subjected to both the "over 65" exemption and the "disability" exemption. 3. Persons claiming the exemptions must comply with the City Ordinances and Texas Property Tax Code. . ORDINANCE NO. 2327 Page Two 4. "Exemptions provided for in section 1 and 2 will remain in force by the City of North Richland Hills unless the City Council of North Richland Hills takes action to change either, or both." PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of September 1998. Charles Scoma - Mayor ATTEST: . Patricia Hutson - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: '~f~ Larry Ko nce, Director of Finance . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 Subject: Adopting the Tax Rate for 1998 - Ordinance No. 2328 Agenda Number: GN 98-102 The notice of effective tax rate was published in the Star Telegram newspaper on August 15, 1998 in accordance with State law. The proposed 1998-99 tax rate for the City of North Rich/and Hills is 57 cents. The proposed rate of 57 cents is a 6.71 % increase over the effective tax rate. The proposed rate of 57 cents is broken down into two parts as follows: 31.5 ø is for the purposes of maintenance and operations 25.5 ø is for the purposes of interest & principal on debt of the City Recommendation: To adopt Ordinance No. 2328 setting the tax rate for the 1998-1999 fiscal year at 57Ø. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available .operating Budget _ Ot".:.:£... __ f(~ {/ "",,vV"' cÞepartment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITE Finane" DIr.C1~ Page 1 of . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2328 AN ORDINANCE LEVYING A TAX RATE FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS FOR THE 1998 TAX YEAR BE IT ORDAINED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS THAT: We, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills do hereby levy or adopt the tax rate on $100 valuation for this City for tax year 1998 as follows: $ .315 for the purposes of maintenance and operation. $ .255 for the payment of principal and interest on debt of this City. $ .570 total tax rate. The tax assessor-collector is hereby authorized to assess and collect the taxes of the City of North Richland Hills on this 14th day of September 1998. 1. That there is hereby levied and shall be collected as provided by law, an Ad Valorem tax for the year 1998 on all property, real and personal, except such property as may be exempt from taxation by Constitutions in the statutes of the State of Texas, and ordinances and resolutions of the City of North Richland Hills, situated within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, on January 1, 1998, and that the amount to be applied to the value of such property shall be 57.0ø per $100 valuation. 2. That the tax so levied and assessed shall be apportioned to the accounts and funds in the amount as set forth above. The amounts collected for payment of principal and interest on debt of the City shall be deposited into an interest and sinking fund for that purpose until a total of $5,000,000 is deposited from the 1998 Ad Valorem tax levy. . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2328 Page Two 3. That the taxes provided for herein are in accordance with the appropriate State statues. 4. Ad Valorem taxes levied by this Ordinance shall be due and payable on October 1, 1998, and shall become delinquent on the first day of February 1999. Payment of such tax is due as provided by the Texas Property Tax Code. 5. If the tax is unpaid after February 1, 1999, such tax will become delinquent and penalty and interest will attach and accrue as provided by the Statutes of the Texas Property Tax Code Sec. 33.01. 6. In the event the taxes become delinquent and in the event such delinquent taxes are referred to an attorney for collection, an additional amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the total amount of tax, penalty and interest then due shall be added as collection costs to be paid by the taxpayer. 7. Taxes herein levied and uncollected shall be a first prior and superior lien against the property, and the said lien shall be superior liens charges, and encumbrances, and such lien shall attach to personal property with the same priority as to real property. 8. The lien provided herein shall be attached as of January 1, 1998. 9. Should any section, provision or clause of the Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so declared to be invalid. . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2328 Page Three 10. The Ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its approval and adoption as provided by law. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, upon first and final reading, at a regular meeting on the 14th day of September 1998. Charles Scoma - Mayor ATIEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: c ,Director of Finance -,..- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Subject: Adopting the 1998-99 Budget - Ordinance No. 2329 Agenda Number: 9/14/98 GN 98-103 Council Meeting Date: The proposed budget for 1998-99 was filed with the City Secretary's office on July 21, 1998. All necessary publications and hearings have been completed in compliance with City Charter requirements and State Law. The 1998-99 General Fund budget is based on the 57rt tax rate which is the existing rate for the current fiscal year. Revisions to the 1997-98 revenues and expenditures have been made to reflect the most current estimates for this fiscal year. The Budgeted Expenditures are: Revised Budget Proposed Budget Fund 1997 -98 1998-99 General Fund $22,437,909 $23,582,955 General Debt Service Fund 6,395,277 7,636,713 Utility Enterprise Fund 16,901,878 16,143,834 Aquatic Park Enterprise Fund 3,188,449 3,286,347 Equipment Services Fund 1,891,535 1,532,218 Building Services Fund 1,929,711 1,489,723 Self-Insurance Fund 3,625,088 3,727,456 Information Services Fund 2,350,816 2,344,287 Park & Recreation Facilities Development Fund 3,884,066 4,029,463 Crime Control & Prevention District Fund 3,437,485 3,673,866 Promotional Fund 366,900 311,781 Donations Fund 86,500 88,396 Special Investigation Fund 386,207 383,963 Drainage Utility Fund 543,698 682,018 General Street Capital Projects 9,131,051 13,388,117 General Drainage Capital Projects 4,564,000 650,000 Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available . Operating Budget _ . Other _ ¡ c~~o#d~:~u,.~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION Fin."". DlreCl'; Page 1 of Fund Permanent Street Maintenance Fund Equipment Replacement and Building Maintenance Projects Public Safety Capital Projects Utility Capital Projects Park Facilities Development Fund Capital Projects General CIP Personnel Utility CIP Personnel Utility Construction Personnel Golf Course Fund Tax Increment Financing District Revised Budget 1997 -98 Proposed Budget 1998-99 400,000 2,301,844 1,699,300 4,976,500 4,773,633 204,116 160,264 645,151 2,153,515 850,000 400,000 700,000 o 1,980,000 2,455,057 211,200 151,905 655,006 2,515,436 o The City of North Richland Hills Crime Control and Prevention District Board of Directors conducted a budget work session on July 24-26, 1998 to review the 1997-98 Revised Budget and the Proposed 1998-99 Budget. As required by law, legal notices have been published. The Board met August 24, to recommend that City Council approve and adopt both the revised and proposed budgets. The Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation Board of Directors held a public hearing on August 24, 1998 to approve the Revised 1997-98 Budget and the Proposed 1998-99 Budget. As required by law, legal notices have been published. Recommendation: To approve Ordinance No. 2329 adopting the 1998-99 Budget for all funds and the revisions to the 1997-98 Budget for all funds. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2329 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998-99; APPROVING REVISED BUDGET FIGURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98; PROVIDING FOR NECESSARY TRANSFERS OF FUNDS BETWEEN ACCOUNTS AND DEPARTMENTS, IF REQUIRED; APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE 1998-99 FISCAL YEAR FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS. WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared certain figures as a 1998-99 budget and has submitted the same to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Manager on July 21, 1998 filed such proposed budget with the City Secretary for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1998; and WHEREAS, the City Secretary did post notice that such proposed budget has been filed and a public hearing called thereon by the City Council in City Hall; and WHEREAS, the City Council determined such proposed budget for fiscal year 1998-99 to be appropriate and correct in all respects and that all requirements of the law have been satisfied; NOW THEREFORE: BE ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: SECTION 1. THAT the budget proposed by the City Manager for the fiscal year October 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999, BE and the same is hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 2. THAT the figures prepared and submitted by the City Manager for 1997 -98 fiscal year BE and the same is hereby approved in all respects. SECTION 3. THAT any necessary transfer of funds between accounts, departments, or programs by the City Manager for City purposes or as a result of unusual or unforeseen conditions during the administration of the 1998-99 fiscal year budget BE and are hereby authorized and approved. SECTION 4. THAT amounts set under the headings "Revised 1997-98" BE and are hereby authorized and approved. SECTION 5. THAT the several amounts, as set forth in the proposed 1997-98 fiscal year budget BE and are hereby authorized to the objects and purposes named, subject to notification in accordance with SECTION 3 hereof if necessary. . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2329 Page 2 SECTION 6. THAT a copy of the 1998-99 fiscal year budget will be filed with the appropriate officials as required by law. SECTION 7, THAT any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word be declared unconstitutional and invalid for any reason, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. PASSED by the City Council on the first reading this 14th day of September 1998. ATTEST: Charles Scoma, Mayor Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department; PlanninQ & Inspections Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 SubjectConsider Ordinance to extend for 120-Days the Moratorium Agenda Number: GN 98-104 Un Permits tor t:lectromc Message Board Signs. Ordinance No. 2331 At the March 23, 1998 meeting, the City Council approved an ordinance declaring a six-month moratorium on the issuance of permits for electronic message board signs. The purpose of the moratorium was to allow staff time to study issues regarding electronic message board signs and make recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Commission for an amendment to the sign regulations. The moratorium will expire September 23, 1998. Since the sign regulations are being considered by one of the Ad-Hoc Committee's, it would appear that any amendment to the sign regulations would incorporate new regulations for electronic message board signs. Therefore, staff is recommending the adoption of the attached ordinance to extend the moratorium for an additional 120-day period. RECOMMENDA TION: That Ordinance No. 2331 be adopted to extend the moratorium for an additional 120 days. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Ot~ Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION Flnanco' Direct"; Page 1 of e - e ORDINANCE NO. 2331 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2289 TO EXTEND THE MORATORIUM ON SIGNS THAT CONTAIN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS FOR AN ADDITIONAL 120 DAYS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council is concerned about protecting residential properties from unnecessary glare from flashing lights on electronic message boards, and WHEREAS, the City Council has declared a moratorium on signs that contain electronic message boards, and determines that said moratorium is necessary to extend for an additional one hundred and twenty days; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, Ordinance Number 2289 is hereby amended to extend the time period whereby no permit shall be issued and no sign that contains an electronic message board shall be constructed or erected within the City of North Richland Hills, except within the Freeway Overlay Zone, for an additional period of 120 days. 2. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 3. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That any and all other ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. Ord, 2331 Page I 4. - EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 14th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1998. Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas - APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City e Ord. 2331 Page 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS -Department: Police Department Subject: Local Law Enforcement Block Grant - Public Hearing 09/14/98 Council Meeting Date: GN 98-106 Agenda Number: On July 13, 1998 the City Council approved the City's Local Law Enforcement Block Grant application for the partial funding of two vehicles for the Criminal Investigations Division. The Grant application has been submitted and is in the approval process in the amount of $39,873. One of the requirements of the Grant is a public hearing regarding the proposed use of the payment under the Local Law Enforcement Grant Program. GN 98-91 approved by the City Council on August 24,1998 set this public hearing for September 14, 1998. Recommendation: To conduct the required public hearing. . Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ th r Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACT/ON ITEM Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 Subject: Interlocal AQreement with City of Keller for Reconstruction of Shady Grove Road - Resolution No. 98-39 Agenda Number: GN 98-108 The City of Keller has requested the City of North Richland Hills allow the connection of their proposed (and under construction) Preston Lane street to Shady Grove Road. The existing Shady Grove Road right-of-way is totally within the North Richland Hills city limits. North Richland Hills has the right to control access to Shady Grove Road. The Interlocal Agreement includes the following: 1. North Richland Hills agrees to allow connections to Shady Grove Road between Smithfield Road and the proposed Preston Lane. 2. North Richland Hills agrees to award a construction contract prior to January 1, 2003. 3. Keller will obtain any additional right-of-way necessary along the north side of this section of Shady Grove Road within six months of notification from North Richland Hills of its need. 4. Keller will participate in the cost of the road construction in the amount of $55,000 or 25% of the total construction cost of the roadway, whichever is less. The Keller City Council has already approved the Interlocal Agreement with the provision for the construction to start by January 1, 2000 instead of September 30, 2003. The Keller City Attorney's contention is you cannot stretch monetary agreements indefinitely and that there must be a deadline. Our City Attorney has reviewed the applicable State law and has advised that this agreement can be extended five years, as we requested. One half of the roadway's reconstruction will be the south side developer's responsibility, along with his platting of the next phase of the Brandonwood Addition. John Barfield is involved in both residential and commercial development along the south side and has Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Account Number Sufficient Funds AvallaDle ,~ ~~ MOO"" o;,<ct~ ~~~"~ Page 1 of _ · - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS indicated he is willing to cooperate on the reconstruction of this section of Shady Grove Road with North Richland Hills and Keller. The cost participation would be roughly split Keller - 1/4, North Richland Hills - 1/4, and the south side developer - 1/2. The estimated breakdown of cost for this approximately 1,200 feet of roadway will be as shown below: City of Keller North Richland Hills South Side Developer Total $ 55,000 $ 71,000 $112.400 $238,400 Staff recommends Council approve the Interlocal Agreement as presented and request the City of Keller to approve the same, including the September 30, 2003 deadline. Recommendation: To approve Resolution No. 98-39. CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page_of _ ~:: c::I I FORES7 BEN ~ V'J ;.; ;0 33 < I Q I 20 24 .... C - BnENT\'J()OD TRAil i i~~ KELLER I C~~..~..,~ -- ROSEWOOD TEAlWOOD I , I CTo ROCKWOOD TEA REST ~ I CT ~ I CRESTWOOD TIìAJl I .b¡¿.~ t"q... ç .....f * WALES :.:: <: ARBOlEDAS "" S S.~êCV Greve , ~ 1!.1 SHADY GROVE w Z ::¡ ~ ü ~ a "" >< o o ~ ~ ~ <>:: => '-' < "" < "" KEL1E I lAVACA T~Il .... Q) ;: '" 2 >= L I I Lift,. 4 j ·0, C,.." I I I TERREll I I o lOCl:En L Nonhfle4d Par1c BROOKE 31 ¡ i SAYERS I 83 " '-' '::c~~~~_;: .. 84 ~ ex RUMF[ELO S. P -~--_.~_..... · · · RESOLUTION NO. 98-39 that: BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, 1. The City Manager be, and is hereby authorized to execute the attached Interlocal Agreement with the City of Keller concerning cost participation and access on a 1200 foot section of Shady Grove Road east of Smithfield Road, as an act and deed of the City. PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of September, 1998. Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: · STA TE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TARRANT § INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF KELLER, TEXAS AND THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, FOR THE WIDENING AND RECONSTRUCTION OF SHADY GROVE BETWEEN PRESTON LANE AND KELLER-SMITHFIELD ROAD KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS This Interlocal Agreement (the "Agreement") for the design, specifications, bidding, contract award, and construction of Shady Grove Road between the east right- of-way line at Preston Lane and the west right-of-way line at Keller-Smithfield Road is made and entered into by and between the City of Keller, Texas, a municipal corporation located in Tarrant County, Texas ("Keller"), and the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, a municipal corporation located in Tarrant County, Texas ("North Richland Hills"). · WHEREAS, Keller and North Richland Hills desire to enter into an interlocal agreement to design and construct roadway (street and drainage) improvements on Shady Grove Road between the east right-of-way line at Preston Lane and the west right-of-way line at Keller-Smithfield Road (the "roadway improvements"); and WHEREAS, Texas Government Code, Chapter 791 (the "Act"), provides authorization for municipalities to contract with another for the performance of governmental functions and services under the terms of the Act: and WHEREAS, North Richland Hills has a need to construct these roadway improvements, which shall be located entirely in the city limits of North Richland Hills and adjacent to the city limits of Keller. · WHEREAS, the construction of the roadway improvements will benefit the public interests of Keller by allowing more efficient and safe traffic movement from both Keller and North Richland Hills onto Shady Grove Road; and Page 1 of 7 · WHEREAS, North Richland Hills hereby agrees to allow road connections from the proposed location of Preston Lane to Keller-Smithfield Road in Keller along Shady Grove Road which is located in North Richland Hills; and WHEREAS, Keller and North Richland Hills, in performing governmental function hereunder, shall make that performance or those payments from current revenues legally available to that party; and WHEREAS, Keller and North Richland Hills find that the performance of this Agreement is in the common interest of both parties and that the division of costs fairly compensates the performing party for the services or functions under this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Keller and North Richland Hills shall provide financing for the Project · as provided herein; and WHEREAS, Keller and North Richland Hills are willing to cooperate with one another to accomplish the construction and maintenance as provided in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, it is mutually advantageous to both parties to enter into this Agreement: WITNESSETH · NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions set forth herein, and the mutual benefits to each party, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Keller and North Richland Hills hereby contract, covenant, warrant and agree as follows: Page 2 of 7 · · 4. · I. ADOPTION OF PREAMBLE All matters stated in the preamble of this Agreement are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into the body of this Agreement as though fully set forth in their entirety herein. II. OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES 1. Prior to September 30, 2003, the City of North Richland Hills agrees to contract for consulting engineering services relating to the design of the roadway improvements. Once the design of the roadway improvements are completed, Keller shall receive the design and have the right to approve same in writing, said approval to not be unreasonable withheld. After approval of the design of the roadway improvements by both Keller and North Richland Hills, North Richland Hills will seek competitive bids for construction of the roadway improvements in accordance with Section 252 of the Texas Local Government Code. North Richland Hills will make all reasonable efforts to award a construction contract on or before September 30, 2003. Without limiting the above, nothing in this section shall require North Richland Hills to award a construction contract. Should a construction contract for the roadway improvements not be awarded by September 30, 2003, neither North Richland Hills or Keller shall have any further obligations under this Agreement. Provided, however, that 90 days prior to the expiration of this Agreement the parties may extend this Agreement upon the mutual written consent of both parties. If a construction contract for the roadway improvements is awarded as described in Section 11(2), Keller shall be responsible for a proportionate share of the engineering and construction cost as follows: either $55,000 or 25% of the total construction cost of the roadway improvements including street and drainage work, whichever is less. Upon completion of construction and final acceptance of 2. 3. Page 30f7 · · 1. · 5. the roadway improvements by North Richland Hills, Keller shall make payments in one (1) lump sum to North Richland Hills. To initiate Keller's payment obligation, North Richland Hills shall submit an invoice containing appropriate documentation of expenses and/or costs, including a certificate of final acceptance from North Richland Hills. Thereafter, Keller will remit payment, as defined in this section, within thirty (30) days after receipt of said documentation. North Richland Hills agrees that the construction to be done within the City of Keller shall be in accordance with Keller's Code of Ordinances. North Richland Hills agrees to construct all portions of the roadway improvements in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and construction contract documents and applicable laws. Any field changes, supplemental agreements, change orders, or additional work orders which may become necessary shall be the responsibility of North Richland Hills and subject to the approval of Keller. Keller shall provide the necessary right-of-way for the portion of the roadway improvements to be located in the City of Keller and more generally described as being north of the current Shady Grove Road right-of-way line between the east right-of-way of Preston Lane and the center line of Keller-Smithfield Road. Keller's obligation to obtain the above described right-of-way is contingent upon being notified by North Richland Hills in writing at least six (6) months prior to the need of said right-of-way for construction purposes and, in no event prior to North Richland Hills awarding a contract for consulting engineering services as defined in Section 11(1) herein. 6. 7. III. IDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS North Richland Hills agrees to indemnify and hold Keller harmless from any claim by a third party for damages arising from or resulting from the construction of the roadway improvements, Page 4 0(7 . 2. However, the indemnification and hold harmless contained herein shall not be deemed a waiver of any sovereign immunity of either Keller or North Richland Hills allowed pursuant to Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Section 101.001 et. Seq., or otherwise. IV. NOTICES Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed to have been adequately given if deposited in the United States mail in an envelope with sufficient postage and properly addressed to the other party as follows: To Keller: City of Keller P.O. Box 770 Keller, Texas 76244 Attention: City Manager To North Richland Hills: City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, TX 76182-0609 Attention: City Manager . A change or address may be made by either party upon the giving of ten (10) days prior written notice, 4. . V. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 1. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. This Agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement of the parties hereto and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements between the parties respecting the subject matter hereof. No amendment, modification or alteration of the terms hereof shall be binding unless the same be in writing, dated subsequent to the date hereof and duly executed by the parties. This Agreement may be executed concurrently in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute on and the same instrument. 2. 3. Page 50f7 . . . 5. If, in case anyone or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. The obligations and undertakings of each of the parties to this Agreement are and shall be performable in Tarrant County, Texas. Each party hereto warrants that it has received authority from its governing body to enter into this Agreement. 6. 7. EXECUTED this the day of ,1998. CITY OF KELLER, TEXAS: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Lyle H. Dresher, City Manager City of Keller Larry J. Cunningham, City Manager City of North Richland Hills ATTEST: ATTEST: City Secretary City of Keller Patricia Hutson, City Secretary City of North Richland Hills APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Stanton Lawry, City Attorney City of Keller Rex McEntire, City Attorney City of North Richland Hills Page 6 of 7 . . . STATE OF TEXAS § § § COUNTY OF TARRANT This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 1998, by Lyle H. Dresher, City Manager, City of Keller, for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTYOFTARRANT § This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the day of , 1998, by Larry J. Cunningham, City Manager, City of North Richland Hills, for the purposes and consideration herein expressed. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas Page 70f7 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Environmental Service Council Meeting Date: 09/14/98 Subject: Approve Contract for TNRCC FY 99 Solid Waste Grant Agenda Number: GN 98-109 #99-04-G11 Public Outreach Programs fOr Residential Solid Waste Reduction - Resolution No. 98-46 The contract provided by North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) is required for acceptance of funding for the passthrough grant from TNRCC . This grant in the amount of $42,339 will be used for Public Outreach Programs for Residential Solid Waste Reduction. The grant provides for funding for one half of the salary and benefits, $17,500, for the Environmental Resource Coordinator which was approved in the 98-99 Budget. In addition, there is $23,400 for promoting programs that are currently underway including Mobile Collection of Household Hazardous Waste, Yard Waste Reduction project, Workplace and City Wide Recycling and for our Texas Recycles Day event November 14-15, 1998 to be held at North Hills Mall. The grant funds are available on Sept 1,1998 and must be expended by August 31,1999. Quarterly reports will be submitted to NCTCOG detailing expenditures and program activities. The Environmental Resource Coordinator will be working with the Cities of Richland Hills, Haltom City, Hurst, Colleyville, Grapevine, Watauga and with the Northeast Environmental Team (NEET) to implement these programs, This contract has been approved as to legal form by City Attorney Rex McEntire. Recommendation: To approve Resolution # 98-46 authorizing the City Manager to sign the contract for TNRCC FY99 Solid Waste Grant # 99-04-G11. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev,) Operating Bud et _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available gnature CITY COUNCIL ACTION FlnancèDnclof Page 1 of RESOLUTION No. 98-46 e Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The City Manager be, and is hereby authorized to sign the attached contract for TNRCC FY99 Solid Waste Grant # 99-04-G11. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 14the day of September, 1998 Charles Scoma - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary e APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ~ or e t __" _ ,'. 4' e . e Main Contract' 9870065316 Subcontract # 99-04-G 11 NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR SOLID WASTE PROJECT This Interlocal Agreement is entered into by and between the parties named below. Neither TNRCC nor the State of Texas is a party to this Interlocal Agreement. I. CONTRACTING PARTIES: The Funding Agency: North Central Texas Council of Governments Herein referred to as "NCTCOG" The Funds Recipient: The City of North Rlchland Hills Herein referred to as "FUNDS RECIPIENT" II. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED: For "Public Outreach Proaram for Residential Solid Waste Reduction" (See "Attachment A _ Work Program and Schedule of Deliverables of FUNDS RECIPIENT"), III. MAXIMUM FUNDING OBLIGATION: The maximum funding obligation under this agreement shall not exceed: Forty-two thousand, three hundred and eighty-nine dollars ($42,389). The budget details are in Attachment B. IV. TERM OF CONTRACT: This agreement is effective Seotember 1.1998 and shall terminate AUGust 31.1999, V. ADDITIONAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS: See Attachment C - Schedule for Reimbursement and Reporting, Attachment D - Special Provisions, and Attachment E - General Provisions, VI. ENTIRE CONTRACT: This Agreement. including all Attachments, represents the entire Contract between the contracting parties. Any changes of modifications to this Agreement must be in writing, Funds for this subcontract are currently available from the Solid Waste Disposal Fund, through Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission contract # 9870065316 with North Central Texas Council Of Governments. The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission has the authority to contract with North Central Texas Council of Governments as per the Current Appropriations Act; Texas Water Code, §5.229 and Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 361.014. The NCTCOG has certified, and the FUNDS RECIPIENT certifies that each has the authority to perform the services contracted for by authority granted in "the Regional Planning Act of 1965", Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 391 and "The Interlocal Cooperation Act," Texas Government Code, Chapter 791, The City of North Richland Hills "Public Outreach Program for Residential Solid Waste Reduction" Page 1 e COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT FUNDS RECIPIENT North Central Texas Council of Governments Funding agency Funds Recipient Signature Signature Mike Eastland Name Name Executive Director Title Title Date Date e e The City of North Richland Hills "Public Outreach Program for Residential Solid Waste Reduction" Page 2 .t - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 09/14/98 Agenda Number: GN 98-113 Subject: ~p.tting M~)(imllm R~~ir. r.~hlp. ~nn In~t~lI~tinn Rates for Marcus Cable - Resolution 98-42 Pursuant to the Cable Act of 1984, as amended, and rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission, the City of North Richland Hills is certified as a franchising authority to regulate basic tier cable service, equipment, installation, and certain other rates for cable operators in the City. The FCC has appellate jurisdiction over the City's rate'regulatory authority and FCCH ' regulations govern the manner in which cable rates are established. II) accordance with FCC regulations, Marcus has filed FCC Forms 1240 and 1205 with the City. Form 124'Orefates to cable service rates and Form 1205 relates to instanåtiórí service charges, leases of - equipA:'lent, and other similar fees and charges, The City subsequently retaiDed C2 Consulting SerVices~'lnc" a cable rate consulting firm, to review Marcus' Form 1240' and 1205 filings, Tfîè attàëhed Resolution sets forth orders for Marcus's rates that are subject to regulation by the City for the period September 1,1998 through August 31, 1999. and are based upon the Consultant's report to City staff. In addition, the Resolution regarding equipment and installation charges also sets a rate of $0.06 per month for Marcus' optional Wire Maintenance Program. Marcus currently charges $0.99 per month for subscribers who opt to participate in the Wire Maintenance Program. Those subscribers are not . charged the hourly service charge in the event that Marcus at any time must repair inside wires owned by the subscribers in order for those subscribers to receive cable service. While this service is purely .optional fQrthesubscribers, several fCCor~~rs'over'~he last f~w years have made_clear .that the_. _ charge for this service is nevertheless'subject to rate regulation by franchising authorities. Based on Consultant's review of Marcus' supporting documentation, it is the Consultant's opinion that the maximum amount Marcus can charge subscribers for this service is $0,06 per month. - - ..... .". ~ ,- Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION Finance Dnc:IDf Page 1 of e A comparison of these current and recommended charges are: Type of Service Current Charges Marcus'Request Consultant's Recommendation Findings Basic Cable* $11.20 $10,73 $10,70 $10.70 Hourly Service $19.03 $27.49 $26.81 $26.81 Charge Remote Controls $0,16 $0.18 $0,18 $0.18 Non-Addressable $0.95 $1.43 $1,19 $1.19 Converters Addressable $2.57 $3.80 $3.22 $3.22 Converters Converters w/ N/A $4,01 $3.43 $3.43 Navigational Guides Charge for $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 Changing Service Tiers Wire Maintenance $0.99 $0.99 $0.06 $0.06 - *Marcus has moved The Weather Channel and Superstation wrBS out of the Basic tier and into the Cable Showcase Tier. RECOMMENDATION That Resolution 98 - 42 be adopted, setting maximum permitted rates for basic tier cable service, installation of equipment and services, and the Wire Maintenance Program for Marcus Cable. e Page 2 ". e e e RESOLUTION 98-42 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED RATES FOR BASIC CABLE AND INSTALLATION OF CABLE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES FOR MARCUS CABLE WHEREAS, The City of North Richland Hills ("City") is certified as a franchising authority to regulate basic tier cable service, equipment, installation, and certain other rates pursuant to the Cable Act of 1984, as amended, and rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"); and WHEREAS, on May 29, 1998, Marcus Cable Associates ("Marcus") filed FCC Form 1240 with the City, which establishes a maximum basic cable service rate of $10.73 per month for subscribers in the City for the period September 1, 1998 to August 31, 1999; and WHEREAS, on July 15, 1998, Marcus Cable Associates ("Marcus") filed FCC Form 1205 with the City, which establishes the following maximum permitted rates: (i) a service charge of $27,49 per hour for installation of equipment and services; (ii) a lease service charge of $0.18 per month for addressable remote control boxes; (iii) a lease rate of $1.43 per month for non-addressable converters; (iv) a lease rate of $3.80 per month for addressable converters; (v) a lease rate of $4.01 per month for addressable converters with navigational guides; and (vi) a nominal charge of $2,00 for changing service tiers; and WHEREAS, the City requested and received from Marcus supplemental information to justify its basic cable service rate request set forth in its Form 1240 filing and its equipment and service installation request set forth in its Form 1205 filing; and WHEREAS, the City retained C2 Consulting Services, Inc. ("Consultant"), which provides cable rate consulting services; which thoroughly reviewed Marcus' Form 1205 and Form 1240 filings; and which provided the City with a written report ("Report"), dated July 2, 1998, that outlined the Consultant's opinions and findings based on its review of Marcus' Form 1240, Form 1205, and supplemental information supplied by Marcus; and ;;i·, WHEREAS, the City provided Marcus with a copy of the Consultant's Report and gave Marcus the opportunity to respond in writing to the Consultants opinions and findings, and, as of September 8, 1998, Marcus had not provided the City with any such written response; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has determined that under federal law and FCC rules and regulations that the maximum permitted rate for Marcus' basic cable service to - 1 - subscribers in the City should by $10,70 per month for the period September 1,1998 to e August 31,1999; WHEREAS, the Consultant has determined that under federal law and FCC rules and regulations that the maximum permitted rates for the services and equipment indicated in Marcus' Form 1205 filing are unreasonable and should instead be as follows: (i) a service charge of $26.81 per hour for installation of equipment and services; (ii) a lease rate of $0.18 per month for addressable remote control boxes; (iii) a lease rate of $1,19 per month for non-addressable converters; (iv) a lease rate of $3.22 per month for addressable converters; (v) a lease rate of $3.43 per month for addressable converters with navigational guides; and (vi) a nominal charge of $2,00 for changing service tiers; and WHEREAS, Marcus provides an optional wire maintenance program for subscribers in the City and assesses a fee of $0,99 per month for that program; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has determined that, under FCC rules, regulations, and orders, fees for programs such as Marcus' optional wire maintenance program are subject to rate regulation by municipal franchising authorities and that as a regulated rate, Marcus' fee for its optional wire maintenance program should be $0.06 per month; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS HEREBY RESOLVES: e THAT the maximum permitted rate for basic tier cable service as calculated by Marcus in its Form 1205 and Form 1240 filings is unreasonable; and THAT for the period September 1, 1998 until August 31, 1999, in accordance with federal law, current FCC rules and regulations, and the Consultant's Report and calculations, the City hereby establishes for Marcus a maximum permitted rate of $10.70 per month for basic cable service to subscribers in the City; and THAT for the period September 1, 1998 until August 31, 1999, in accordance with federal law, current FCC rules and regulations, and the Consultant's Report and calculations, the City here by establishes for Marcus the following maximum permitted rates: BASIC CABLE SERVICE $10.70 PER MONTH e SERVICE CHARGE FOR INSTALLATION OF SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT: $26.81 PER HOUR LEASE RATE FOR ADDRESSABLE REMOTE CONTROL BOXES: $0.18 PER MONTH LEASE RATE FOR NON-ADDRESSABLE CONVERTERS: $1.19 PER MONTH -2- , . - e e LEASE RATE FOR ADDRESSABLE CONVERTOERS: $3.22 PER MONTH LEASE RATE FOR ADDRESSABLE CONVERTERS WITH NA VIGA TIONAL GUIDES: $3.43 PER MONTH NOMINAL CHARGE FOR CHANGING OF SERVICE TIERS: $2.00 OPTIONAL WIRE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FEE: $0.08 PER MONTH THAT in the adoption of this Resolution, the City does not approve or acquiesce in any manner to cost date and/or methodologies used by Marcus to support its basic cable service rate request in its Form 1240 and Form 1205 filings; and THAT in the adoption of the Resolution, the City does not waive any rights to Which it may be entitled PASSED AND APPROVED this, the 14th day of September, 1998. Charles Scoma, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary BY: Approved as to content; James D. aint, Assistant to the City Manager Approved as to legal form: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City BY: - 3- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Economic Development Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 Subject: Public HearinQ to Consider Creation Of Reinvestment Zone Number 1 Ordinance No. 2333 Agenda Number: GN 98-114 On July 13, Council received the Preliminary Financial Plan & Project Plan to create a Tax Increment Financing (TI F) District in and around the 42-acre Richland Plaza shopping center development-and authorized staff to schedule a Public Hearing and provide 60-day notice to the other four local taxing entities. Now staff is returning to you with an ordinance to create a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) at this same property (see attached map). You will recall that upon creation of a TIF District, the existing tax value in the designated district would be temporarily frozen-with all additional improvements dedicated to paying of the Mackey Creek north channel improvements necessary for redevelopment of the site into "Rich land Business Centre", a mixed-use business campus. The drainage project will be debt financed, with the life of the TIF proceeding until the bonds are retired. Over the past two months, David Medanich of First Southwest Company, Director of Finance Larry Koonce and I have formally presented the preliminary plans to the governing body of each taxing entity, as required by State law. While all five taxing entities appear to be willing to help share the burden of paying for these improvements-and agree with the City's preference to payoff the bonds within 10 ears-North Richland Hills assumes total bond oversight, accountability and liability. You will note that the ordinance also creates a TIRZ Board. In light of the City's liability-and its status as the governing body which initiated the Zone-North Richland Hills is allowed to appoint multiple voting delegates (in this case, up to 11), as stipulated by State law. The TIF Act also states that every other taxing entity is allowed one voting delegate. First Southwest Company recommends that the City appoint five delegates to the Board, creating a 9-member policy body. Upon Council's action to create Reinvestment Zone No, 1, staff will provide copies of the approved ordinance to the other taxing entities for their consideration. Upon their adoption of the ordinance- and indication that their entities will participate in the TIRZ, the City will call the first formal meeting of the TIRZ Board to consider and approve the Preliminary Financing Plan and Preliminary Project Plan. After that time, we will return to Council for ratification of the two Plans (see attached timetable). RECOMMENDATION That Council approve Ordinance No. 2333 establishing Reinvestment Zone Number 1, City of North Richland Hills. Finance Review partment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION I Finance DIr.ClOt Page 1 of . ORDINANCE NO. 2333 WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills City Council has determined that the economic well-being of the City of North Richland Hills is of primary concern, and; WHEREAS, Chapter 311, Texas Tax Code, known as the Texas Tax Increment Financing Act, provides that the City of North Richland Hills has the authority to create reinvestment zones within the City for the purpose of economic development, and; WHEREAS, on February 23, 1998, the City Of North Richland Hills City Council passed Resolution 98-10 1) finding that the condition of the 42.09 acre complex formerly known as Richland Plaza and the surrounding area meets the State's criteria as "substantially arresting or impairing the sound growth of the municipality creating the zone" and does "constitute an economic or social liability" and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use and 2) expressing the Council's intent to form a tax increment financing district, and; WHEREAS, on July 13, 1998, the City of North Richland Hills City Council received a Preliminary Financial Plan & Preliminary Project Plan and called a Public Hearing for Monday, September 14, 1998, to consider the creation of "Reinvestment Zone Number 1, City Of North Richland Hills", and; . WHEREAS, the City Of North Richland Hills delivered copies of the two preliminary plans and provided 60-days notice to each affected local government taxing entity and likewise formally presented the Preliminary Financial Plan & Preliminary Project Plan to the governing body of each entity, and; WHEREAS, on the 7th day of September, 1998, notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram stating that a public hearing would be conducted by the City of North Richland Hills City Council on the 14th day of September 1998, to consider the creation of a tax increment reinvestment zone herein described in Exhibit "A" and pictured in "Exhibit B" as a reinvestment zone, and; WHEREAS, it is the finding of the City Council of the City of North Rich/and Hills, following the public hearing, that the creation of a reinvestment zone for the above stated property would significantly enhance the value of all taxable real property in the proposed zone, attract major investment within the zone, contribute to the expansion of primary employment within the zone and will be of general benefit to the City of North Richland Hills, and; - BE IT THEREFORE ORDAINED that the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills hereby finds that "Reinvestment Zone Number 1, City of North Richland Hills", or the property herein described in Exhibits "A" and "B", meets the requirements of Section 311.005 of the Texas Tax Increment Financing Act and therefore is designated to take effect on January 1, 1999, as specified in Section 311.005(a)(5) of the same Act. . . . PAGE 2 BE IT ALSO ORDAINED that Reinvestment Zone Number 1, City of North Richland Hills will expire in 2019 or when bonds sold to fund Mackey Creek drainage improvements expire, whichever comes first, and; BE IT ALSO ORDAINED that the City Council of the City Of North Richland Hills hereby creates a tax increment fund for the aforementioned zone to hold tax revenues and retire bonds for said improvements within the zone, and; BE IT ALSO ORDAINED that the City Council of the City Of North Richland Hills hereby creates a board of directors for the zone as provided in Section 311.009, comprised of the following members: City Of North Richland Hills - five (5) members, Birdville Independent School District - one (1) member, Tarrant County - one (1) member, Tarrant County Hospital District - one (1) member and Tarrant County Junior College - one (1) member. Passed in open session of the City Council this 14th day of September, 1998. Charles Scoma, Mayor City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Marty Wieder, Director of Economic Development APPROVED AS TO FORM & LEGALITY Rex McEntire, City Attorney . . . . . EXHIBIT A REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER 1, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Metes & Bounds Description BEGINNING at a point being the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 17, Richland Hills West Addition and the most northerly corner of a 38.773 acre tract designated by the Tarrant Appraisal District as Tract 1 out of the M. Lynch Survey, Abstract No. 953 and in the west right-of-way (ROW) line of Billie Faye Drive; THENCE, south along the west ROW line of Billie Faye Drive approximately 200 feet to a point; THENCE, in a southeasterly direction leaving said west ROW line crossing Richland Plaza Drive a distance of approximately 65 feet to a point in the south ROW line of Rich/and Plaza Drive; THENCE, in an easterly direction following said south ROW line and also being the north property line of Tract A, A2, and A 1, Richland Plaza Addition approximately 1,650 feet to a point in the north ROW line of State Highway 26; THENCE, in a southeasterly direction approximately 170 feet across State Highway 26 to a point in the southeasterly ROW line of State Highway 26 also being the most northerly corner of Lot 1, Block D, Richland Hills Addition; THENCE, following said southeasterly ROW line in a southwesterly direction approximately 870 feet to a point, said point also being the most westerly corner of Lot 10, Block D, Richland Hills Addition; THENCE, in a northwesterly direction perpendicular to the State Highway 26 centerline approximately 240 feet to a point in the old northwesterly ROW line of State Highway 26 (formerly State Highway 121); THENCE, in a southwesterly direction with the old northwesterly ROW line of State Highway 26 approximately 1,212 feet to a point being on the city limits between North Richland Hills and Haltom City and being at the intersection of the said old S,H. 26 northwesterly ROW line and the north ROW line of Broadway Avenue; THENCE, in a westerly direction with the north ROW line of Broadway Avenue approximately 720 feet to a point being the southwest corner of Tract C, Richland Plaza Addition; 9/3/98 . . . ; THENCE, in a northerly direction leaving the north ROW of Broadway Avenue a distance of approximately 50 feet to a point of intersection of the west property line of said Tract C and the south boundary line of the M. Lynch Survey, Abstract No. 953; THENCE, in a westerly direction along the south M, Lynch Survey boundary approximately 320 feet to a point being the corner of Tract B, Block 2, Diamond Oaks South Addition; THENCE, in a northwesterly direction along the east boundary of Block 2, Diamond Oaks South Addition approximately 1,985 feet to a point being the northeast corner of Lot 3R, Block 2, Diamond Oaks South Addition; THENCE, in an easterly direction across the north property line of a 38.773 acre tract denoted as Tract 1 out of the M. Lynch Survey, Abstract No. 953 approximately 1,810 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 9/3/98 / I I I I v I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I j' , I ! '~ , I I I , I ~ \ I I I \ I I I I I I SI9 - se: :u 00£ - U! L sle:>s I ~IJ..II ~In ..... 8" I . REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER 1, City Of North Richland Hills TIMETABLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION September 14 City Council Considers Ordinance No. 2333 Creating Reinvestment Zone Number 1 September 15 - September 30 Overlapping Jurisdictions vote to participate in the TIRZ September 28 City Council Appoints City's TIRZ Board Members October 5 City Convenes First Meeting of TIRZ Board; Board is asked to approve Preliminary Financing Plan and Preliminary Project Plan October 12 City Council is asked to ratify Preliminary Financing Plan and Project Plan October 13 - November 30 Overlapping Jurisdictions vote to contract with City pursuant to the Financing Plan and Project Plan . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~ Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 9/14/98 Subject: Direct Staff to Draft Spedfi~s for Oeveloping a North Davis Overlay District Agenda Number: GN 98-115 At the July 13 City Council meeting, the North Davis Community Citizens Group made a presentation to the City Council about their ideas and concepts regarding an overlay zone in the North Davis Blvd Region, This group presented information related to enhancing landscaping regulations, architectural design requirements, and sign regulations to insure that development is of high quality, refining permitted land uses, and other increased development standards. No action was taken on their presentation but comments were made that the Land Use Ad Hoc Committee would look at overall increased development and land use standards in our city. It was also mentioned at the July 13 Council meeting that in an effort to expedite the review and update of sign and landscaping standards that Council would be taking steps to remove these from the Zoning Ordinance and make these stand alone ordinances, By doing this, changes could be made for enhanced signage and landscaping requirements, much more quickly and without going through two hearings, but just one. The Planning and Zoning Commission in fact has considered such changes, and on September 28 Council will be asked to remove signage and landscaping from the Zoning Ordinance and to make them separate. Councilman Milano has requested that this item be placed on the Council Agenda for direction to the staff to begin drafting specifics for development of an overlay zone in the North Davis area. It is staff's understanding that Councilman Milano is requesting consideration for moving forward as soon as possible with implementation of an overlay zone for the North Davis Region, If Council wants to proceed with this overlay district, staff would request direction as to whether to include architectural design as well as possible zoning modifications and sign and landscaping enhancements, or if there are others that you would like to have us include in a possible overlay district. Recommendation: To provide specific direction to staff as to desires of Council on this North Davis Overlay District. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION FlMne» Dhdor Page 1 of ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~, ~ Ci~:~- "" ~' . ~ '. ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ e e e "€ o Z ~ o rJJ ~ ~~ 00 .~ ~ 0\ U '"0 ~ <l) ~ ~ ~~ <l) o ~ ~ ~ u ~ .~ ~ ]~ ~ ~ <l) 00 <l) ~ ~ e e ~ ~ '-.J .~ ~ c ~ .~ ~ e .-;;:.., ~~: ~ ~ .~ ~Q) ~ OD cd~ . ~ .~ rfJ~ oo~ 8 ~ 0 (1). cd ~ ~J;4.,~ 0 ~ ·~·::to·~ ~ ~ .~~~ ~ cd cd ~~ Q) ~ rfJ OD ~ ~~ Q)§~ ê ~ Q) c.8ö~ Q) ~ Q) Q) 00 Q) ~ Q) ~ ~~rfJ .~ 0 8 ~ ~~ . 8 oo~.g ~ o ~ .~ 0\ Ucd~,...-. ~'2~ è ~Q)oocd ~ ~ ~ ~ > S cd ª O~O~ . . I .~ ~ .~ 8 ~ Q) 00 o ~ o ~ ~ Q) .s o ~ Q) 00 ~ o ~ 00 Q) ~ ~ .~ ~ Q) ~ .~ ~ .~ ~ ~ . Q) ~ ~~ '-'\oJ . ~ ~u ê] . ,9 ~ ~ ...,..... ~ ~ Q) ~ ~ E~û5 .~ Q) 8 ~ Q) 8 .~ ~ o > cd u~~ Q) Q) cd ~ J:;J .~ ~o~ ~ ~ cd cd u .s~~ ~ .9 Q) E 1a .~ oj ~~~ 00 ::3~~ g ar Š .~ ~ ~ 8 b1} Q)No~ ~0<3uo ~~~~ . e e ~"':'< ....... , ....1 a .~ .~ ~ e t,:·~~ .-'.,,. ¡.þ.....- ~'/', ~ ~;." ~ 1:: o Ztn ~ ~ ON ~Q) ~~ ...-4 ~ o - Q) E ~~"ÇJ::: 0 ...-4 'Cò'~ ~ ..-. :'~~;::::~~.. ~ ~ ~~å)' ~ \J,I 5 ë ~ ..-. ;::::::$ 0 ...-4 ~~] ~Q)U '"C;:::C-+-f d 0...-4 0 Cd ~ ~ tI.) 1""""4 ~ Q) ~ 0 ...-4 U o~ U ~ ~ Q) d ~;S 0...-4 d '"C Cd tI.) ~ ..-. d o ~ °a bO~8 oS Cd Q) d ~ ~ o Q) tI.) N~"-' C-+-fCd:= OÖ~ § E] 0...-4 Q) Cd tI.) ~ ..-. o ...-4 ~ ~ > ~ <:.) ~z~ .... . t-· ,¡ ..::";. . o è E d Q) U ..-. ..-. tI.) 0 0 ...-4 o~ Þ ~ t 0 ...-4 ~ '"C Q) Q)U::: d ~ ~ Q).~ Cd ~ 0 ~ -...,¡ ~ ~~..:: u ~ ~ C-+-f.~ 0¡j :::..-. 0 ~ Q) e::t Cd ~ ~ 0 ...-4 tI.) ~ ~ ::: ~ 8::: ~ ~ Q) ~ e::t Cd ~ S 0;::::::$ ~~ Q) ::: S tI.) ~ .s e::t 0 Q) .S ...... " ~ t"\ Q) ~'-'u~ u ~ '"C os ~ 0 ã ~dQ)~þ~ -.. Cd u 'òi 0 ...-4 ~~ tI.) § U Q) ~ 0.¡j ~ ~ ~ ;::: ~ d ~ ~ 0...-4 -.. Q) ~ ~~:> ~ '"C ~ ~ C-+-f ;> ~ . ...-4 Cd ::: 0 ~ ~ tI.) d ...... Q) ....... ~ Q) Q) ~ tI.) ~ ~~~ ~ Cd IIIC) o is ~ .~.,D ::: ~ObO~,,~ .-0 ..D d I:..ì 0 ~ ~ Q) ~ 0...-4 ~ 8 ~ 0= 0 0~8 ~ 0 ;::::::s tI.) ~ d &... ~ Q) 0 ~.. 0 ~ Q);::::::$~~u~ ~~S'~~~ ~ > 0 .'"-11 ~ ~~ U U r.à ~ tI.) 0 ...-4 ..... .J. Q)S"Sò8~ bO 0 0 ::: d .= ã d~ e::t Cd ~ ~ R o~ ::: ~ ~ u~~~5~ . . . ~ ~ o ...-4 U Q) ;S C-+-f o Q) tI.) Cd .,D . u o ...-4 d Q) u tI.) . e ~ ~ e e . .. c --- ~I >- " : t.,~ I L >t ca ¡;~ -- cae.. CJ>t eca ... - CD'" .eCD 1::> 0° :z: e " 0 00 ~ ~ Q) 00 ~ u ~ ~ cd a ".Q cd ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ 0 00 · ..-4 Q) · ..-4 ~ '"C ~ ~ 00 · ..-4 $-.4 00 ~ 0 $-.4 Cd'~ ~ bl) Q) '"C .s . . 0 ~ "...<~ . "-00 ' $-.4 ~ · ..-4 0 ~ cd ~ . .....-4 ~ 0 ~ ~ cd Q) ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ U N .~ . ..-4 U . cd U ~ cd · ..-4 ~ ~ Q.) ~ ~ ~ Q.) ~ 00 Q) Q.) bI) ¡:~ s Q.) .s ~ ~ s ~ I .....-4 S Q.) cd · ..-4 ~ ~ e 0 ~ Q) 0 u c2 0 ....;. ~ $-.4 . Z r ~'': U '"C '"C N ;~~~~: ~ .....-4 ~ cd a Q) 00 ~ ~ · ..-4 ~ Q) ~ · ..-4 ~ ~ 00 u 0 0 u ~ Q) .~ bI) $-.4 ".Q ~ ~ Q) ~ ~ '"C ~ bl) .~ s ~ Q) Q) 00"0 ~ · ..-4 U 00 u u bI}~ S · ..-4 Q.) 0 ~ 0 '"C '"C . 0 ~ $-.4 $-.4 00 .~ ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ Q.) Q) $-.4 · ..-4 · ..-4 ~ .....-4 "0 Q.) 0 ~ 0 Q) ~ § cd · ..-4 a .~ Q) 00 > ~ cd ~ cd '"C · ..-4 S ~ ~a u Q) 00 cd 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~~ ~ cd $-.4 Q) U u £3 ~ 0 ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ .....-4 (l.) (l.) .~ u ~ 0 0 r./1 ~ U cd ~ ~ ~ u . . . . . e e rJJ ~ ~ (]) . ~ ~ (Î ~ F.j!!' bI) (]) ...:¡¡' e t:'.;;, (]) ¡¡.-..;.. ~ ~ .~ tJ 0" U . " 0 ~ (]) ~ ~ ~ ~ rJJ Q) 01) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a E .~ bI) ~ ~ u ~ Q) Q) u .~ (]) ~ rLJ ~ 01) :> · ....-4 (]) ~ ~ ~ · ....-4 (]) ~ rJJ U ~ ~ 01) rJJ ~ C\j u C\j < .~ ~ rfJ. rfJ. ~ . . . . . e e e ~ cd .~ o ~ Q) 8 8 o o ":"0 '.~'-'~ ,,:~,.~~, cd . '.~ ~ ',. ~ cd ..c '.¡j ... ~ '"0 Q) Q)'"O 51 . c;j .~ Q) 00 ~ ~þ .~ Q)~ ..c cd '"0& ~ ~ bJ) o ~ ...c= . ~ 00 ~ .~ 00 >< ~ Q) .+oJ .8 ~ ~ o ~ Q) 2 S S ~ .~ ~ 00 ~ 0 ~ ~~ ZQ) 0 Q) 0'"0 I ~;:: . e . ~Q) ~ d) cd ~ S g ~ 0 o 0 >.'"0 ~ Q) .~ 00 ~ 0 S ~ .~ Q) ~ ~~ '"00 Q)O ~ ,........ C,)~ 2 0 ~ 8 ~ ~ 8 8 .~ Q) >< ..c cd '"0 S ~ ~ cd o Q) ...c= > 00 cd oo...c= ~'"O .8 ~ C,) cd 2~ ~ cd · 00 .~ 00 ~2~ Q) Cd 0 Z8:C . o ~ 15 Q) C,) cd .~ '"0 cd ~ Q) ~ "'0 Q) ~ .~ S .~ ~ Q) ..c "'0 ~ ~ o ...c= . 00 00 ~ Q) ...c= . ~ bJ)t:: .~ Q) ] ~ § ~ .~ ~ ~ cd C,) .~ 2 15 ~ Q) ~~ o 00 U ~ . bJ) s::: .~ "'0"'0 §] ~..c o 00 o ~ ~ 0 "'0 ~ Q) .8 ~ 0 cd s::: Q) 0 ~S ... >.~ E ::s o~ 00 cd cd Q) S~ 15 0 Q) ~ 0"'0 o Q) cd 00 ... ::s ~ Q) .9 ..c 1d"'O ~ ....-4 ~ ::s o 0 . ~ ...c= t:: 00 cd 00 Q) bJ) "'0 s::: cd .~ ~~ ~ cd . 00 Q) ....-4 ~~ o ~ ~ . e ~ e '" ~~ .;~, '~."~~ .~. >~ ~ "-. ~+'" 'J.' t'< a..¿;r ~'";~..'; t8 e i, ~. .. , -, ! " f t :J .: j r {~ .. : } \ ~, ì ,:,' ..-, : ~; . - ~, '" " " ""'';<'''' . . -.' :~-:~-. .".. '.. ....'. )~: i:' ~..., ~- " e Cf.) "'C ~ ~ ~ Q.) ro ~ S ~ ro ~ .~ "'0 ~ ~ Q.) ~ > ã Q.) Q) 0 u "'C ~ t) ro .~ ~ ~ .~ Cf.) Q.) "'0 Q) ~ Q) ro ~ .~ 0 Q.) , : "'C ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ . ~ Cd' -~ Cf.) .'. . ,". ~~.~. .~ .~ ~ Q.) ~ '~,... ro u 0 Q.) ..D 0 ~ie'~ ~ ~ Cf.) u . Q.) Cf.) "'0 Cf.) Q.) u . .,~~..~ ~ Q.) Q) ro ~ ro Q.) .~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ Q.) ..D ~ OS) ro N ro ~ ~ Q.) S >. ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ Cf.) . ..c: S ....... Q.) Q.) ~ Cf.) .~ ....... ~ "'C Q.) Q.) ~ 0 ro ~ q...¡ r-:-i ~ ~ .~ ~ I Q.) U ã Cf.) 1:: è ~ .~ ~ ..D Cf.) Q.) ~ Q.) t8 S ;9 ~ Q.) Q.) ~ "'C e Cf.) ;9 ~ > 0 ....... ".,¡"u Q.) ~ .~ ~ ~ So'" ~ '"0 Q.) ~ :!.~. ~ Q.) bb u ~ 0 ~:~ ~ Q) ª .s ~ ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ ..c: cd Cf.) . '"0 s:: Q.) ro :: Cf.) q...¡ .~ >. ~ ~ t::t r. Q.) ~ Q.) ~ ~ Q.) 00 Cf.) þ s:: s:: 0 ..c: ro Q.) .:: ã Q.) 0 ..c: ~ s -S .~ ~ ~ > U N Cf.) OS) .~ 0 . ....c .~ ~ Cf.) Cf.) s:: ~ Q.) ro ~ ~ Cf.) Q.) s:: Q.) ~ ~ ~ . ....c ..c: ~ u > Q.) ~ ~ oo~ q...¡ ~ Q.) ã .~ u ~ s::'"O ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ S .~ 0 .~ s:: ..0 ....... Cf.) .~ ~ ~ro .s ~ro 0 00 Q.) Q.) 0..0 ~ ~ ~ u ....... ..c: ~ ro ro ~ Q.) ro .~ 0 Cf.) .~ ~ Q.) ....... '"0 Q.) "'0 u ~ '"0 > .~ Q.) .~ u Q.) ª ~ 0 ~ Q.) ~ . ~ > ::s è Q.) "'0 ¿j 0 0 '"0 ~ S ¿j ã ~ s ~ 0 Q.) ~ ro ~ Cf.) Q.) S ~ Q.) 0 0 E Q.) Cf.) Q.) (1) (1) bù ~ >. ~ ~ 0 Q Cf.) Z ~ ~ ..D ~ ~ u ~ . . . . . e e e I ~ ....:> ) ~~~~ t.~· ~~ ~. .~. e .. I . ( , "." ... e ~'. . e e ;:f'~ þ ~ ~ 00 · Q)~ ;9 0 00 ì ~~ ~ Q) 'f~~ ~ ~ - ' ,$ è"~.~·~~ ~ ~ ~._>I"~: S 0 o .~ ...¡:j ~ "0 ~ .8 ª "§ ~ 00 ~ ~ Q) 00 ~ u § :.== ~ b 8 ~ Q) ~~;9 "Ou~ Q) .~ 0 ::::= ~ ~ o Q) U .t3~~ ~ Q) o ,,00 ·u u þ~ ~ .~ ~ ::s U Q) Q) Q) "0 ~~s ~ ~ \0\.1 ~~ i~ .. . . 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) 00 Q) S ~ S ::s .~ ~ ~ 00 ~ o (1) Q) d ~ > ~ 0 Q) Q)~"O ,.,.. . ~ ...,~ 00 · ~ ::s ~ ~ o Ol}~ ~ .~ (1) 00 ~ (1) b1) Cd ~ ~ U d .~ 0 ~"O~ (1) ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ "000"0 ~ (1) (1) g ~ ~ ~~~ 00 0 Cd ~ "0 .~ ....., ~ "0 ß E (1) ~ 00 ~ ~ .5 "0 Q) 00 ~ ~5bg ~.~ ~ ~oooo . 00 ~ ~ .~ ~ . Q) Q) ~ N ~ .~ S 00 (1)"0 m~ oo~ (1) b1) .~ .0) ~~ o ~ .~ "0"0 E Q) u .~ Ë .s 00 ~ ~"O 8 ª (1) " ~Ol} "0 .s ~"O ::S......c o .~ ~ ::s oo~ 00 Q) ~~ Ol)~ .~ 00 CI'.) ~ . e e e -.-,;.;,. ~~ ¡"-'-:i: ~:,i.~ .~ e e e e e c.o ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ c)J e o ~ .-c:; ã en ~ ~ ~ S~ ~ -~ ã) ~ ~~ o ~ o en M r/}~9 S .s C,,) i~ëa M 'S ~!lêiE~J;;Ë 0 ~ ...~- " r/} ~ ~ cd -- .-c:; 0 .!""':") OJ) -- M "'0 ~ ~ .- cd -- M ~ "'0 gt= gpã ~~ Oen "'0 ~ M ~ 1.,·..._. ã ~ :: ~ ~. :§ § .~ g "- ~ '0 ~ M ~'-jo ~ cd ~ 0 ,-, S S' ~ -; OJ) -- ~ ~ .S ~ M ..9 ~Bþ~cd ~ :.a -C ~] C,,)=~~en en cd C,,) 0 ::s ~]~~] en ~.-c:; ~:g ::s cd -- .- ::s Q)=> So 1"""4 CJ:) 0 ~ -- M ~..s ~ > ~ ~ ..,.. . . ~ - ~ ~ ~ S o C,,) ~ o "'0 Q) ~ o Ë en - 8~ 000 .5 Ë ~ en ~ ~ ~ S ~ -J:: -= ~ &~ ~;9 M ~ "'0 -_ -"'0 ::s ~ o CI) ~ ::s en Q) ~ CI) - 0 ~;9 ~ ~o . ~ ~ ~ 0 en .- ~ ~ 1:: M_J:: ~ ~ ~ ~cd~ ~~S . o ~ en ~ - .g ~ .g~ o 0 ~ en CI) cd gfS .- ~ 00> cd ._ ~ 0 o cd ~~ ~ M,.d ~.~ :::: ~ cd en ::s M "'0 0 ~_ "'0 Ol) -S d 000 ~ 0 -.¡:j ã=..8 -o~ ~-- 0 ~ ~ "'O1::~ ~ 0 cd S ~ ~ en CI) __ ~ ~ > Ocd.-c:; ~.b s:= I OJ) cd þ~Q) -- 0 en U ~-õ cd OJ) ~ ~ ~ M ~.- ~ o Co) q...;¡ "'0 ~ ::s <~~ . e e e e r\ Q) a ~ Q) ;....c 8( ) ~ ~.s ~ § õ 0 ~ .S Z ~8 :::: ~.s Æ s::: 0 .a ._ ....... ~ s. .š CIS ~ .~ :;::: '1:1 s::: ~ ( ) :>.... s::: ~ ._ ....... ;;> ~ .- rJ) I-< ....... Qh~» :€ ~ B 8 Q)~-~ 0:> ,.'" ~~~.= ;;> ~~ '1:1 ., .;¿" 00,:;::: s::: '1:1 ( ) § E 'k 'Ì:j' <:) ( ) ( ) ~ rJ) '" ., E ~ Þ ~ :.õ ~ ~~ ;~û 0 ~~ æ ~ § ( ) ~ ;:j ::s! p... CIS .- ~ ~ õ .~ ~ ~ 1i:i ..... Cf.Í '" s:::;;> "" ~ .~ ~ 1] ~ ~ ] ~ (~ [þ ~ ~.~ 8 .~ ~ ~~ .- .- .a ~ rJ) ..0 _ k~ ~~~~ g. [] .š ~8~~ s. ( )oB ~ 8 0 ~ s::: '1:1 Cf.Í rJ) s::: . CIS ~ <:) ( ) 0 ( ) s::: ( ). _ rJ) rJ) o 0"""'. - 1i:i. - ..;1 '1:1.-<;:: ( ) Q) ..... Þ 1i:i s:::.sg t¡..., .sg 8 P.. ~ >S:::rJ)~ o~0-e~ SQ) ( ) 0 ~ '1:1 '1:1 rJ) ( ) :>.. CIS ~ ~ -.¡:j ~ ~ It '" 0 Q),........ ~. VI Q) ( ):.:a~ § f'-j 0 ::J8û ~u F:].s<:)~t+::: . . . . e - e e ~ ~ ~ ~ e þ:~~ ~- r~~ ~...~ ~~ ~..J; .:.. .' ,~~. . ý :~~. v···· :.,-.:: r: ~~"" e e e e e ;: ~.-- ~"' .~- ~...:..t ; . ~~-\ - s o ~ .- þ . """"" .- U ~~~r (1) ::,' ~,~, ..,ic','"'," ~11~ ~ ""'è~:'.~.. .;"',;,f 5~~_HI 0 .--..4 ~ .""""" s:: ~ .""""" OI) § .s .--..4"'0 ~ s:: ~&OO ~ oo.~ (1) ~.~ ~C\j§ d~S 8 B S (1) ~ 0 ..c= (1) u t s:: ~ o OI) s:: Z C\j (1) (1) S ~ ...c:: ~ · ~ ~C\j"'O ~ ~ C\j . è. (1) 00 ~(1) o ~ ~ s:: ~(1) .--..4 > C\j (1) .""""" ~ ~ ~ s:: C\j (1) ~ "'0 .""""" ~ 00 t ~ (1) "'0 ~ ã ~ ëd ~ ~ .""""" (1) C\j ~~ .~ (1).""""" s..c= S .s o OI) u s:: ..c= · """"" ~~ 0.--..4 ~ ~ ~ ~ (1) (1) (1) 00 ~ U C\j 00 ~ (1) (1) "'0 ~ ~ (1) U.--..4 ~ ~ ~ . OI) s:: . """"" ~ U U o ~ ~ ~ s:: (1) ~ U 00 . """"" (1) OI) C\j ~ (1) ~ . . . ~ .€ ~u (1) (1) ~,...c: ~ ~ ~ 0 o ~ ~ 00 ~ (1) s::;.:= (1) .""""" S S S::c.S 8 ~ . """"" . """"" > (1) s::~ (1) (1)"'0 .2: § ~ 00 U ~ ~ § ~ s:: C\j (1) s:: ~ C\j (1) (1) ~ "'0 ~ .""""" 0 6 ~ ~ 0 ~ U . e (/) ~ a ~ ~ ..!::ì ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ C\:S ~ Q) ~ ~ § ~ Q) .~ s ~ (/) ~ 8 " ~ ~ (/) 0 ~ . ,....¡ Q) ~ 0 ~ bI) Q) . ,....¡ ~ 'öD~ a ;> Q) 8 (/) í::: c,:' Q) ~ ð ~ "'0 " ' .~,~ · CJ) ._~. u Q) bI)~ ",..,e,. Q) Q) .~ bI) U '-.-/ "0 CJ) ~ ~ . Q) a ~ .~ ~ (/) t) ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ . 0 (/) Q) ~ "'0 0 0 ~ N . ~ ~ (/) a . u .s Q) ~ Q) C\:S e 8 0 (/) Q) ~ u ~ (/) ~ ~ ~ CJ) (/) ~ ~ Q) .~ Q) "0 C\:S C\:S ~ Q) 0 ;> u ~ Q) s a ~ ~ 0 Q) ~ ~ f?.~ ~ Q) 0 ~ ~ ~~ ~,:' C\:S ;> ~ ~ ~òd ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;> Q) ~ "0 ~ bI) Q) 0 ,,-..., "0 ~ ;> CJ) . ~ (/) u a ~ "'0 .~ ~ Q) Q) ~ c.8 ~ ~ ~ "'0 ~ Q) ~ Q) .~ 0 Q) 0 ~ ê "'0 " "0 (/) bI):-9 N Q) "0 .~ Q) OJ) Q) ~ ~ (/) u ~ (/) ~ ª Q) .~ Q) ~~ cd cd ~ ~ ~ 5b Q) "'0 ~~ ~ a Q) "'0 U Q) . ,....¡ 1:1 cd u § ~~ ~~ CJ) ~ ~ rJJ. ~ (/) . . . . - ~ \:S .~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ !~ ~~ ~ ~,".;;f".(j"., '~;·t~'?".: a CI:) .~;:;Ù, ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ e - (]) i3 ~b1) d . .~ þ ,~t û ' . .-.... rJ:j , '....þ'. ......-4 " "\ " "\ '~tê~2..~, ~ ~ ~,"','~,,'.,"':, cd t. ~ ~'::.... ~ ~ ~ Q) " "\ ~ ~ ~ 0 ......-4 . ~ cd ~ (]) Q ~ ~ o þ;> (]) ......-400~ ~(])~ ~. Q rJ:j cd.~ 0 ~ ~ S (]) (]) ~ Q rJ'.) \" \ Q) '"C d ~ Q ~ 00 cd 0 Q) rJ'.) ~ '"CQ)......-4 · ~ U ......-4 »~ cd o ~ 8 ~ 0 00 . '"C ã £ Q) ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ d Q) ~~ 0......-4 .~ cd d > (])'"C ] ã ~ ......-4 Q) Q) è: ~ Q) Q) rJ'.) ~ Q) Q ~ d ~ .~ . . þ ~ .~ ......-4 ......-4 ~ cd ~ ] ~ Q) ~ ~ > o ~ ~ ~ Š B d ~ Q) Q) 0 U ~ Q) ~ ::s > rJ'.) ,.D Q) d >< "'C (]) cd ~ Q) ~.~ bb Q) R " "\ 00 ..... ~ ~ Š ~ ~ s 6 Q.) 0 ~ Q Q ~ . . · "'\:s ~ ~ ~ ~ a .~ ~ ~ ~ '-.) ~ ð e e Q.) ~ Q.) ~ · ...-4 ~ M~ 'Qç',~ (:) ~,:... Q.) ...... ¡.;, ~ ....~~....~ '0 '....-4 , (.) "'0 Q.) Q.) oS § ~ ....-4 Q.) >. ~ ~ ~ Q.) ~~ ~'f . ...-4 0 ., ] E ~€ o 0 "'0 Z · cd ~ "'0 Q.) cd ~ ..:J (.) ::] ~ cd 00> ..d~~ {J:) ~ Q.) ....-4 þ~~ ....-4 0 {J:) UN. ...-4 . ~ "'0 OJ) ~. ~ s:= · ...-4 ::] . ...-4 ~ 0 § {J:) -t ..d "" -'...... "'O~ ~ {J:) ~ t-4 Q.) Q.) {J:) ~ ~ {J:)...... Q.) ~ . ...-4 . ...-4 ~ (.) "" ~ > ~ s:= \,,~. ~ ~ s cd § U "" ~ s:= · ~ "'0 \,,~ . ~ 00 ~ ~ "'0 00 "" ~ ;;> O~ ~ \,,~ o 0 0 00 ~ ~ t, Q.)~ >.~ Q) ~ ~ .~ ~ "'0 "'C . ~ U ~~ '0 o ~ Q)~i ~~ oSoo~ ...... . ~ \,,~ Q) ':+:: 00 0 þ 00 ~ s:= "'0 S:=. ...-4 ~ . ...-4 cd !ä 0 U cd "g p.. - 'VJ ~ 'û e ~ ~ .> ~ ~ d~ cd Q.) >'d ~ 00 (.) ~':¡j ~ · ~ cd cd "'0 s:= e .5 e ~ S:=·Õ 0 OJ) Q.) 0 cd.~ U Q.) > ~ "'C r\ ~ . ...-4 ~ s:= Q.) 00 "C ~ Q.) Q.) 1:) ~ "3~ S 8..g-=ª . o Q) p., 0 ~ ;:! ~ ~ ~..9 Q) 0 ~ ;:! ÞS~ ~~o~_ Û8~Q~UOD . .