The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1996-01-08 Agendas . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 8, 1996 - 6:30 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills Community Center in the Municipal Court Room, 6720 Northeast Loop 820. . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. IR 96-01 Hewitt Drive Drainage Improvements (10 Minutes) 2. Possibility of Handgun Ordinance (5 Minutes) .- 3. GN 96-02 Clarifying Power of Certain Boards - Ordinance No. 2092 (Agenda Item No. 14) (5 Minutes) 4. GN 96-04 Amending Franchise Agreement with Laidlaw Waste Systems and Granting Rate Increase - Ordinance No. 2096 (Agenda Item No. 16) (10 Minutes) 5. GN 96-05 Part-time Shelter Attendant (Agenda Item No. 17) (5 Minutes) 6. PW 96-01 Award of Bid on Harmonson Road Paving, Drainage and Utility Improvements (Agenda Item No. 23) (5 Minutes) 7. Other Item s . , . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JAN UARY 8, 1996 For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills Community Center in the Municipal Court Room, 6720 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items marked with an * are on the consent agenda and will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretãry's office at 581-5502 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting December 11, 1995 5. Presentations by Boards & Commissions 6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda e . e Page 2 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 8. *Executive Session (10 Minutes) - The Council may enter into closed executive session to discuss the following: A. Consultation with attorney under Gov. Code §551.071 : Consider Watauoa vs. NRH , 9 I Adjournment --'7:20 p.m. I *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. Page 2 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 & 27) 8. PZ 95-24 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of American Eagle Homes to Rezone Tracts A7, A9, A10, A11 and A 12, Block A, Hewitt Estates from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Resìdential and to Rezone Tract 4C5, McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, from AG Agriculture and R-1 Single Family Residential to R-1-S Special Siñgle Family Residential - Ordinance No. 2093 (Located on Buck Street, east of Meadow Road) 9. PZ 95-25 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Paul Bourland for a Special Use Permit for a Personal Care Home on Lot 3, Block 1 R, Holiday West Addition - Ordinance No. 2094 (Located at 6909 Meadow Park North) 10. PZ 95-26 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of HSM Development to Rezone Tracts 3, 3A3, 3A3A, 3B, 3A3B, and 4A 1, Mann Survey, Abstract 1010 from AG Agriculture to a Planned Development - Ordinance No. 2095 (Located in the 7000 block of Hightower Drive) . e Page 3 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *11. PS 95-39 Request of Robert McCauley and Steven Hester for Replat of Lot 3 and 4, Block 2, Walker Branch Addition (Located at 8851 Grapevine Highway) 12. GN 95-150 Consideration of a Request to Change the Name of Parkman Drive to Rogers Drive - Ordinance No. 2090 (Postponed at the December 4-1, 1995 Council Meeting) *13. GN 96-01 Quit Claim DeedJo State - Resolution No. 96-01 *14. GN 96-02 Clarifying Power of Certain Boards - Ordinance No. 2092 15. GN 96-03 Accept Budget and Set Budget Hearing for Crime Control and Prevention District 16. GN 96-04 Amending Franchise Agreement with Laidlaw Waste Systems and Granting Rate Increase - Ordinance No. 2096 *17. GN 96-05 Part-time Shelter Attendant e e Page 4 . - NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *18. GN 96-06 Professional Services Contract - Girls Fast Pitch Softball Complex *19. PU 96-01 Award Bid for GIS Color Plotter *20. PU 96-02 Award Contract for Long Distance Service .- *21. PU 96-03 Approve Contracl with Siemens Rolm for Telephone PBX Maintenance *22. PU 96-04 Award Bid for Modular Furniture for the Planning and Inspections Department *23. PW 96-01 Award of Bid on Harmonson Road Paving, Drainage and Utility Improvements *24. PW 96-02 Approve Budget Revision for Nor'east Drive Storm Drain Extension . . Page 5 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *25. PW 96-03 Approve Supplemental Agreement NO.1 with the State of Texas for the Reconstruction of Rufe Snow Drive from IH 820 to Watauga Road - Resolution No. 96-02 *26. PAY 96-01 Authorize Payment to Motorola for Maintenance Agreement - Resolution No. 96-03 .- *27. PAY 96-02 Ratify Payment to Worth Business Forms for Printing of Budget Books and Capital BudQ.et Report 28. Citizens Presentation 29. Adjournment . POSTED ÚiC.:., :) ¡- Date ¿l~ ¿l.fYl- Time e fP~ By_ .' . . e " INFORMAL REPORTTO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL N IR 96-01 o. -*- Date: T Subject: January 8, 1996 HEWITT DRIVE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS During the May 5th storm last year, two homes on Hewitt Drive flooded. As we reported to you in our Summary of Flood Projects dated June 23, 1995, it was estimated to cost $580,000 to remedy the flooding situation on Hewitt Drive. In response to further requests from one of the homeowners who flooded, we have looked at reconstructing a portion of the parkway and street at the south end of Hewitt Drive and the north end of the existing concrete drainage channel. Modifications to this portion of Hewitt Drive should allow more overland flow in the street to get into the concrete channel at a lower flood water elevation. This should help mitigate the flooding situation for the two houses that previously flooded. Cost estimates with sketches will oe distributed at the Pre Council meeting. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS D;'T -+=== r ~ r---- --:;: STAR~~S Ru ____ r &i\\ I I .~ r--- I CI:: - ~ r- I ..L - ~ ,\-1 ~ "= R oJ ~ ~ I -......... ~ ~-------,c,.;,1 r ~'.H·r~'·ï1~ l 1 ·,·1 ~// ~! I r- SHAtJ1}' CRG IT RD ".. I I / ::;.,,' 'T p¡,:W"-:- / -~ . r.~\\ ~J'!"¡-'¡ ~¡'~;;/ ~ ~ I ~ : ~ ~ ¡ p ~ ~~lu ~ I~Ç'¡~'" ~ V~ I .,; ' SE RD :, GREEN i'''~LLl: DR ~fJ )'-~ - - I ...j r to> ./ rr- I ~ _I- ~ I -1/ ~ I~ - ,~ =2J ~-:== ~ ::;." J - _1 111;31-- [\ RUMFiE~ Rb __.--- ...¡ ~ STARj.tES ,~ I- ;': - -1 ~::== ~~1 "'- e-~ l:-= f1s :~ _ C L c:¡ \ '-HIGHT ~ff'rt--(}p. r--- ~ I I I 1 /' ;= ( - í 1 t.Jl--1- /v / ~-fT 1--) _ -l- ~,~ \ '- _ 'I' ·0 InR >-- ~ '- l ~~ -=; \ " ~~Ùm 5ITÈ?)-r--.. I, ~ ~I ~Á I ~ - t\S-, !~ Fl r- ---....,. I ~ ,~I ~~ \ ~~ ~ I N('~ I r ~~. ~ ~ ClfAPu¡, N lJ. f- l II~ '~ ~ A\),\J 1 I-- ~ ~ ~\ ~ ' '-- L C/~AF',fA~ RD I tr-£ f: ~,/" ""I~I~ I )-!- ~ . ì _ J -~ 'It¡ I Co t:' = ~ 7 '\ I L t" / '. rT m:. r t:: - / <_ - ~ \ :¡ E/ on-=; ~_ w/(~ mn LJ-J MART R; ¡",AueA ~ ~? ~mub~/~ ~~~? "Yj \ ,~ ¡ -,(~ r t:::;' , ~~tnJ s' '\--...: ~ ..- ' "<../ ~lrJ .,/ :1'7 '- - ~ /~ Ûí h Niif;;. N (gl/.<~ ~ -¡/ (/ /~~~ 11mJID~\,;L ~.~þ [·rr "~- ~ ;l ;~. I ~< ~~"/ . ~-\ ~___..., --~ \) ',/,' / ~\. ~ ~ -\ \ ~../ ì ~r- rur.R:11 . -.';;/' '" !t:::S~/ ~ ',l-Lll{:J -£~~ ~\\I\\r~l: I LT1 ~ ~.~~ \~~"~/' . Ç'¡ I 1 ~..'" .... ,,~ / \ ,-: '\ II:: I'll f D ~ :; -"'?,,'" j I ',..,..~./' " I . ~ ClR- I ","/' .~. I NTE RST ~ T/" L 0 01'''' 0 N L ~,.(1-;'J _~. g =I, -r \lIm'!.!'r::- £, \ ~I t .ì . i, . I I \ WILSO,~ ........ ....... .. ..j ~ ~ ~ ~ .. 8 U R S ErR f.J--L-L--f I ~~ ~ I II:: I ì Q., -.1 ( ,/] +~.~ .-'--~ ---- \. 81'Fi -E r Rl ==j ~, > ~ ~\Rf\ LN CI a:: -.: ~ · N o:rth Ri.chla.:n.d Hi.lls HEWITT ST. DRAINAGE BEGINNING OF CONCRETE CHANNEL January 5, 1996 ...............--...--.---........--..................-...........--.....-.............................................................-....................-.................................................................................------......-.............-...............................-........--....--...........---............ ~ SAWCUT. REMOVE AND REPLACE,EXISTING PAVEMENT ~ CONSTRUCT TRAPEZOIDAL. FLUME WITH 6 FT. BOTTOM ....... ....... SCALE: 1" = 20 I ........ CONSTRUCT 5" THICK ~ REINFORCED CONCRETE e.-- -- ............ ....... h -- h.. h.... --... -- -- -- ... ----.......... --..... .... __............ __..... __... __................ ....... ................. h....................... ................. U__... ....... __.... ....... ....... ........ ........ ........ , . North. Rich.Ia.n.d Hills Drainage Construction Cost Estimate HEWITT ST. DRAINAGE January 5, 1996 Item Qty. Unit Price Extension Sawcut existing HMAC 100 LF $ 3.75 $ 375.00 Sawcut existing Headwall 18 LF 7.50 135.00 Remove existing HMAC 150 SY 10.50 1,575.00 Excavate and Haul Off 210 CY 7.00 1,470.00 Unclassified Material Remove and Reinstall existing 1 LUMP SUM 1,500.00 1,500.00 chain link fence Construct 6" lime stabilized - 160 SY 7.00 1,120.00 subgrade Lime for subgrade 2.5 TON 140.00 350.00 Construct 6" HMAC Pavement 150 SY 17.00 2,550.00 Construct Trapezoidal Flume: 15 CY 400 6,000.00 Top=12' ; Bot=6' ; Depth=l' Dowel Prop. Flume into 14 EA 60.00 840.00 existing headwall with #3 bars @ 12" c-c Construct 5" concrete flat 150 SY 42.00 6,300.00 work wi #3 @ 18" c.c.e.w. Subtotal $ 22,215.00 Contingencies 2,285.00 GRAND TOTAL $ 24,500.00 e .. e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - DECEMBER 11,1995 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order December 11,1995 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown JoAnn Johnson Lyle E. Welch Mack Garvin Ray Oujesky Byron Sibbet .- Linda Spurlock Sansoucie Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman e Staff: Randy Shiflet Larry Cunningham Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Greg Dickens Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Secretary Attorney City Engineer Absent: Mark Wood C.A. Sanford Jeanette Rewis Councilman City Manager City Secretary 2. INVOCA TION Mayor Pro Tem Johnson gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 1995 APPROVED e Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the minutes of the November 13, 1995 meeting. e December 11, 1995 Page 2 Motion carried 6-0. 5. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1995 APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve the minutes of the November 20, 1995 meeting. Motion carried 6-0. <.:" 6. PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS .;,... No action necessary. 7. REMOVAL OF ITEM(SfFROM THE CONSENT AGENDA e None. 8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (10,11,12,13, 14, 1~20,21,22,23,25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35 & 36) APPROVED . Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 6-0. 9. PZ 95-18 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1874 REGARDING CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVED PARKING AREAS _ ORDINANCE NO. 2069 APPROVED e Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor to please come forward. e e e Decem ber 11 1 995 Page 3 Mr. Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning, presented the proposed ordinance. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No. 2069. Motion carried 6-0. <: *10. GN 95-145 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES FOR PLEDGEE SIGNATURE AUTHORIZATION FORM - RESOLUTION NO. 95-61 APPROVED - *11. GN 95-146 AUTHORIZED INVESTMENT OFFICERS _ RESOLUTION NO. 95-62 APPROVED *12. GN 95-147 AMENDING AUTHORIZED INVESTMENT OFFICERS LIST FOR TEXPOOL - RESOLUTION NO. 95-63 APPROVED *13. GN 95-148 INTENT TO REIMBURSE EXPENDITURES WITH PROCEEDS OF FUTURE DEBT - RESOLUTION NO. 95-64 APPROVED *14. GN 95-149 DESIGNATION OF THE FORT WORTH STAR TELEGRAM AS THE "OFFICIAL CITY NEWSPAPER" _ RESOLUTION NO. 95-60 APPROVED e e e December 11, 1995 Page 4 15. GN 95-150 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE NAME OF PARKMAN DRIVE TO ROGERS DRIVE - ORDINANCE NO. 2090 POSTPONED Mr. William E. Hill, 328 West Cheryl Avenue, appeared before the Council. Mr. Hill expressed his opposition to changing the name of Parkman Drive and requested Council to disapprove the request. Mr. Hill also advised there was a numbering problem in the assigning of street addresses on the street. ....: Mayor Brown advised the City would straighten out the problem with the street addressing. -- Councilman Oujesky asked if the Rogers were present. There being no one present to represe'ht the Rogers, Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to postpone action on the request and directed Staff to contact the Rogers and inquire if they were aware that there were descendants of the Parkman family still residing in the area. Motion carried 5-1; Mayor Pro Tem Johnson and Councilmen Welch, Garvin, Oujesky and Sibbet voting for and Councilwoman Sansoucie voting against. 16. GN 95-151 LITTLE BEAR CREEK FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT- ORDINANCE NO. 2091 APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve Ordinance No. 2091. Motion carried 6-0. 17. GN 95-152 NRH20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS APPROVED Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Johnson, to approve GN 95-152 and accept all of the recommendations except for the price increase for the 1995/96 season. He asked that it be reviewed after another year of operation. e e e Decem ber 11, 1995 Page 5 After discussion on the group rate, Staff was instructed to study the group rate and bring a recommendation back to Council. Motion carried 4-2; Mayor Pro Tem Johnson, Councilwoman Sansoucie, Councilmen Oujesky and Sibbet voting for and Councilmen Welch and Garvin voting against. 18. GN 95-153 APPOINTMENT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVED Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Johnson, to appoint Mr. Charles Owen to Place 6 on the Planning & Zoning Commission and Capital Improvement Advisory Committeé: Motion carried 6-0. - *19. PU 95-76 AWARD ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR LETTERHEAD AND ENVELOPES APPROVED *20. PU 95-77 AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF TRACTOR WITH LOADER APPROVED *21. PU 95-78 AWARD BID FOR LIBRARY LIGHTING MODIFICATIONS, PHASE II APPROVED *22. PU 95-79 REQUEST FROM HUDIBURG CHEVROLET TO WITHDRAW BID APPROVED *23. PU 95-80 AWARD BID FOR 1996 VEHICLES APPROVED 24. PU 95-81 AWARD OF BID FOR LAYOUT AND PRINTING OF CITY NEWSLETTER APPROVED December 11, 1995 Page 6 e Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet to award the bid to Tarrant Printing at $5,256 per edition. Motion carried 6-0. *25. PU 95-82 AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF MOTOROLA RADIOS FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVED *26. PU 95-83 AWARD BID FOR FLATBED TRAILERS APPROVED ~ 27. PU 95-84 AWARD BID FOR REPAIR OF THE COLLEGE HILLS TRINITY WATER WELL APPROVED e Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve PU 95-84. Motion carried 6-0. *28. PU 95-85 REJECT BID FOR 1995 LOADER FROM AIS CONTINENTAL AND AWARD BID TO FUTURE EQUIPMENT COMPANY APPROVED *29. PW 95-74 RATIFY AGREEMENT WITH BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR SIGNALIZATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR HOLIDAY LANE AT MID-CITIES BOULEVARD APPROVED e *30. PW 95-75 RATIFY RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITIONS FOR RUFE SNOW DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION _ ONYX DRIVE NORTH TO GLENVIEW DRIVE APPROVED December 11, 1995 Page 7 e *31. PW 95-76 APPROVE BUDGET FOR INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTS ON RODGER LINE DRIVE APPROVED *32. PW 95-77 APPROVE BUDGET FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTS ON MID-CITIES BOULEVARD APPROVED *33. PW 95-78 APPROVE 1995/96 CITY STREET OVERLAY PROGRAM APPROVED -- 34. PW 95-79 APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUDGET FOR LITTLE BEAR CREEK FLOOD STUDY A'PPROVED e Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve PW 95-79. Motion carried 6-0. *35. PAY 95-22 APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.4 IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,991.19 TO JRJ PAVING, INC. FOR HOLIDAY HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *36. PAY 95-23 APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.5 IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,132.67 TO M.A. VINSON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. FOR HOLIDAY LANE, SECTION B - CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED 37. CITIZENS PRESENTATION e Ms. Patsy Johnson, 3808 Rufe Snow, appeared before the Council. Ms. Johnson advised they owned a furniture store on Rufe Snow and because of the street e e e December 11, 1995 Page 8 construction they have had to close their business because they have not been able to access their parking lot. Mayor Brown advised Ms. Johnson that the City Manager and Attorney for the City would contact her about her problem. 38. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting. <t:.': .;,... Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - Assistant City Secretary ·epartment: Subject: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Inspections 1/08/96 _ Council Meeting Date: Public Hearing to consider the request of American Eagle Homes to rezone Tracts A7, A9, A IDA, A 11 and A 12, Block A, Hewitt Estates, from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential; and to rezone Tract 4C5, McComas Survey, Abstract 1040, from AG Agriculture and R-1 Single Family Residential to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential. (Located on Buck Street, east of Meadow Råad) Agenda Number: PZ 95-24 Ordinance No. 2093 American Eagle Homes is the developer of a 6.405 acre tract of land located on the north and south side of Buck Street, east of Meadow Road. Approximately 5.1 acres of this property are split by the AG Agriculture, R-1 Single Family Residential, and R-2 Single Family Residential zoning districts. The developer has ~ submitted an application to change the zoning on most of the tracts to R-2 Single Family Residential and on one of ~he tracts to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential. ~ The portion of the property presently zoned AG Agriculture is approximately 3.144 acres in size. This area is proposed for rezoning to R-2 Single Family Residential. This area is generally located on both sides of Buck Street, with a portion fronting on Frankie B Street. (See Areas A and C on the attached zoning exhibit) The R-2 district requires minimum lot sizes of 9,000 square feet and minimum dwelling unit sizes of 1,800 square feet. Hoûses constructed in this subdivision will require side or rear entry garages. .he portion of the property split between the AG Agriculture and R-1 Single Family Residential zoning districts is approximately 1.986 acres in size. This area is proposed for rezoning to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential. This area is located south of Buck Street, fronting on Meadow Road. (See Area B on the attached zoning exhibit) The R-1-S Special Single Family Residential zoning district requires a minimum lot size of 1 acre and a minimum dwelling unit size of 2,000 square feet. The R-1-S district also allows horses, cattle and other agricultural uses by right on the property. The surrounding area is a mixture of agricultural, quasi-agricultural, and single family land uses. The surrounding zoning districts include R-2 and AG to the east and south, R-1 and AG to the north, and R-1-S to the west. (see attached zoning map) The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a Public Hearing and considered this zoning change request at its December 19, 1995 meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review .urce of Funds: onds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget .".,. Other ~~~8;~:-~-~ Department ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . F,n~nc. Dllecror ORDINANCE NO. 2093 . AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2, SECTION 200, OF ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 22, 1993; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a change in zoning district boundaries; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORJ:fAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: - 1. THAT, on Case Number PZ 95-24, the following described property shall be rezoned from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential: . BEING a tract of land out of the JC McComas Survey, Abstract NO.1 040, Tarrant County, Texas, and being the same tracts of land as described in deeds recorded in Volume 4127, Page 649 and Volume 6285, Page 854, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2-inch iron pin set for the most westerly northwest corner of tract being described, said point being located in the south line of Tract G described in deed recorded in Volume 4127, page 649, Deed Records. Tarrant County, Texas, said point also being the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 5, Hewitt Estates, an Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-167, Page 69, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 89 degrees 19 minutes 06 seconds East 177.57 feet along the south line of said Tract G as described in Volume 4127, Page 649, to a 1/2-inch iron pin set for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 21 minutes 35 seconds West 149.76 feet along the East line of said tract as described in Volume 4127, Page 649, to a 1/2-inch iron pin found in the south r.o.w. line of Frankie B Street for the most northerly northwest corner of tract being described; . THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes 58 seconds East 178.29 feet along the south r.o.w. line of Frankie B Street to a 1/2-inch iron pin set for the northeast corner of tract being described, said point also being the northwest corner of a tract of land as described in Volume 4188. Page 409, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; This property is located on the south side of Buck Street, east of Meadow Road. . 3. THAT, on Case Number PZ 95-24, the following described property shall be rezoned from AG Agriculture and R-1 Single Family Residential to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential: BEING a tract of land out of the JC. McComas survey, Abstract NO.1 040, Tarrant County, Texas and being the same tract of land as described as Tract 2 in deed recorded in Volume 8694, Page 2343, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2-inch iron pin found for the most southerly southeast corner of said tract being described, said point being located 21.36 feet South 00 degrees 00 minutes 59 seconds East from the southwest comeL of Lot 6, Block 4, McComas Subdivision, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-90, Page 58, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said point also being the northeast corner of a tract of lan~s described in deed recorded in Volume 7866, Page 1534, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 27 minutes 41 seconds West 605.77 feet along the north line of said tract as described in Volume 7866, Page l534 to a point located in the centerline of Meadow Road for the southwest corner of tract being described; . THENCE North 00 degrees 05 minutes 48 seconds West 142.82 feet along said centerline to a point for the northwest corner of tract being described said point being located 20.26 feet South 89 degrees 28 minutes 18 seconds West from the southwest corner of a tract of land as described in Volume 11991, Page 633, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 89 degrees 28 minutes 18 seconds East 201.17 feet along the south line of said tract as described in Volume 11991, Page 633, to a 1/2-inch iron pin set for corner, said point being the southeast corner of said tract as described in Volume 11991, Page 633; THENCE North 89 degrees 27 minutes 31 seconds East 404.81 feet along the south line of said tract as described in Volume 8694, Page 2343, to a 1/2-inch iron pin set for the northeast corner of tract being described, from which found bolts bear North 19 degrees 14 minutes 02 seconds East 2.20 feet and North 00 degrees 04 minutes 23 seconds West 4.89, said point being the northwest corner of said Lot 6, Block 4, McComas Subdivision; THENCE South 00 degrees 00 minutes 59 seconds East 147.69 feet along the west line of said Lot 6, Block 4, McComas Subdivision to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1.986 acres of land, more or less. This property is located on the east side of Meadow Road, south of Buck Street. . 4. Ordinance No, 2093 Page 3 .ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City ç ~ . . Ordinance No. 2093 Page 5 . . . PZ Minutes - Page 2 December 19,1995 2. PS 95-42 Ms. Skare stated it could help because underground storm drains are the most likely solution to the drainage patterns on the property. Ms. Delores Webb, 6820 Meadow Road, came forward to speak. She stated that right-of-way exists for Frankie B Street to Meadow Road, but there is no pavement. She stated that herself and Mr. Forrest Johnson have concerns about this road being constructed. She stated she has sent a letter to c.A. Sanford stating her concerns. Ms. Webb stated a new street intersection on Meadow Road would not enhance the area. She suggested a cul-de-sac on Frankie B Street. Mr. Long stated the entire street is not improved. He stated he does not know how soon the developer intends to develop the two lots on Frankie B Street. Mr. Davis stated the adjacent property owners can petition for abandonment of the right-of-way. He stated he does not know if a cul-de-sac is feasible. Mr. William Lusby, 7425 Hewitt Street, came forward to speak. He stated he would like to see larger homes required in this area. Mr. Davis statichvhen considering the zoning request, the Commission must determine if the request meets the requir~ments of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the general development pattern of the area, and the highest and best use of the property. He stated the other issues are platting and engineering issues. Ms. Webb stated her concern about the drainage patterns on the property. - Mr. Charles Templin, 6728 Meadqw Road, came forward to speak. He stated his concern about the possible extension of North Forty Drive west to Meadow Road. Mr. LeBaron stated a prior owner asked the City Council for relief from extending North Forty Drive to Meadow Road. He stated the Council acted favorably on the request. Mr. Davis stated that based on the Preliminary Plat, the road would not be extended. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Baxter made the motion to approve Pl 95-24. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck. The motion carried 6-0. ated on Chairman Barfie ed the Commission has previously discussed the drainage issues, a cul-de-sac on Frankie B Street, a extension of North Forty Drive. Mr. Davis stated he is in agreem engineer to develop a feasible way of-way for the street. at North Forty Drive should not be extended. He asked the -de-sac Frankie B Street and abandon the remaining right- Chairman Barfield stated a masonry screening w since lots will be fronting on the road. Mr. Charles Templin, 6728 Meadow Road, came forward to . He stated the Master Thoroughfare Plan shows Holiday Lane to be extended on Mea oad. He asked if consideration needs to given at this time for the future plans for this r Mr. Davis stated that the developer is dedicating additional right-of-way on future widening, but they are not showing any other thoroughfares in the area. -:: \~~ -;..:. "þ ~Q~~ o l - ~ MEADOW I . 1 I '" ;:) y '\\ ';g ~.~ " '" i I I G"" > ?2 uo uo CD > :J '" .... .::J 15 1~ I .;¡ \ '" ;:) .¡ I - """" 8 :;; ""1 o ;;:! :! ~;--I f;~ -- '" CD - 0') ;:0 c . ~ ",;j ~... - ~X1:::) N:; '" . ~ o~ .., I l;~ '" ~;; f;ñ o o N I '" N I '" I I I ~ I (; I :: I I '" . ~- 0.;:) >... '.-,0 N- o::;:: >t'. ("J_ " I-=- I""",,, ~, '~ _ \~\ I 0ì ~ \'~Vi' ~ ~ '.V-· 'J i ~,'..J'"), '- - """" rT"l~ - I ....~" I ~! li~: i - _ ~ 'oJ t ~..., 1 nQ '~=' I ~ I .. L ¡.~:;;.! I' JI:><.-:&I (Õ~ I t .. 1 I I = I = > '" '" ;:) I : I , "', ~. _. , , , , , , ... ... CI2 > I ... I'þ . ¡ I , UO I '" HEWITT ST u I _ I ;~:: I ' ",- I. . ¡:.'æ; ~ !;:: ,_ I I T I I ! CREEK z ~ - > CD I I , , - 'J' = 0- ~~ :: '" c ... ~ > '" RD :: ;;: :: uo - - -¡;",- - - - - - - - - i ttJ ~ ::S ::¡ .., » '= .., ... "00 POST . ::¡ § uo 1230 õ ... uo '=' \~. - en - I...¡ I I I I I ¡ ! .n! ~\.. I I I \"I~!~I/ S;ö I ~:;; ! '--J , L~~ I .~~, ~ 006' . . . (C(Q)[?)V Mr. C.A. Sanford, City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Re: Planning and Zoning Commission Case Number PZ 95-24 Dear Sir: 7520 Hewitt street North Richland Hills, TX 76180 December 19, 1995 -ç In reviewing the above re~erenced rezoning request, I am concerned about drainage to the west on Frankie B. Street if a street is cut and finished to Meadow Roãd. presently Frankie B. Street is paved to the east property lines of Block 4, Lot 4, and Block 5, Lot A7. (Please see attached map.) My wife and I are the owner~ and live at Block 4, Lot 1, Hewitt Estates. Frankie B. street is the unfinished street on the south of our property. with the permission of the City, I fenced across the street easement on the south of our property to the north property line of Block 5, Lot A7, and have maintained that easement between our east and west property lines since 1981. Based upon concerns for natural drainage, I would request the City to re-dedicate the unfinished portion of Frankie B. street to the surrounding property owners, ending the street as it is currently. Another option would be to make Frankie B. street a cUl-d-sac, ending at the northwest corner of Lot 5, Block A7. We would appreciate your review and consideration of our concerns. sincerely, . Forrest FDJ:kw encl. Map ~: Mr. Clayton Husband Planning and Zoning Department . . . ·APPLICATION FOR A ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE CITY Of NORTH RICHLAND HILlS 7301 N.E. LOOP 620 NORTH RICHLAND HILlS, TEXAS 76180 617-661-5616 Please print all responses PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION N \ ' pART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER: TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER: 8/7 - 8-'7 - 9,388 LL LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY flEW/V E57ATE Ít C f} loll , STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION WHERE ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE IS BEING REOUESTED: n / J.-~( IJ /1 A5 I f' 75;; 1-+: .. . o PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST CLRRENT ZONING: A& t .;1,A f(-( ~ Hl:ASON FOR CHANGE: SU.1W:Y OR MAP ATTACHED AS REOUIRED BY THIS FORM: ~ ATTACH AFFIDAIIrT FROM PROPERTY 0 c:::J YES D NO ~ YES I f¡ereby certify that the above information is correct to the best of my knowfedge. DATE: S() ()T/'i wB;ïêRtJ D I 5í ~ IC.T ðF ílfF." Your Name (printedfi!I?JSílt'I,J ¡t1'SSI0,.tJÁ~Y AlLl.AM.E Signature PART 4. OFFICE USE ONLY P & Z PUBUC HEARING DA TE: TAXES PAlD? DYES CASE NUMBER: P2 t¡ '.;. DNO CITY COUNCIL HEARING DA TE: LIENS PAID? DYES DNO FEE $300,00 ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE APROVED: ~ YES c::J NO ORO. NO, ASSESSMENTS PAID? DYES DNO This application ""'I nee be ø::hedJled 10< public hG..~ng .....11 "" appIlc:alJon '" Is receiYed SIIPULA nONS: ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE Page 1 01 2 CD-044 (1-9-1) epartment: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Inspections - Council Meeting Date: 1/08/96 Subject: Public Hearing to consider the request of Paul Bourland Agenda Number: PZ 95-25 for a Special Use Permit for a Personal Care Home on Lot 3, Block 1 R, Holiday West Addition. (Located at 6909 Meadow Park North) Ordinance No. 2094 Mr. Paul Bourland is the owner of a house located at 6909 Meadow Park North. Mr. Bourland has applied for a Special Use Permit to operate a Personal Care Home in this residence. The property is presently zoned R-3 Single Family Residential, and a Personal Care Home is allowed by Special Use Permit in this district. The following are the issues regarding this request: 1. Maximum Number of Residents: 1"he house has approximately 1,872 square feet of living area. The maximum number of residents allowed in this facility is six, according to the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Floor Plan: The floor plan of this hoÜseìndicates four bedrooms; a family room, dining room, kitchen and breakfast room; two bathrooms; and a converted garage. -3. Parking: This property is zoned R-3 Single Family Residential. This district requires that four off-street parking spaces be provided per dwelling unit, with at least two spaces being covered. The number of cars parked regularly at this property shall not exceed 5 (1 car per bedroom). The garage is presently enclosed. and Mr. Bourland has requested the enclosure be allowed to remain. The Planning and Zoning Commission also required that Mr. Bourland provide space for three off-street parking spaces. 4. Signs: No signs advertising the business are allowed on the property. 5. Distance from Similar Facilities: This proposed Personal Care Home is not located within a one-half mile radius of another Personal Care Home. The closest facility is located on Carolyn Drive, east of Holiday Lane. There are presently four other homes in operation in the city. 6. Licensing: Mr. Bourland must obtain a license for this facility as required by the Personal Care Facility Licensing Act (Section 247.021, Tex. Health and Safety Code, V.T.C.A.) prior to the first annual re-inspection of the property. Verification of licensing must be provided to the city prior to the first annual re-inspection. Finance Review .urce of Funds: onds (GO/Rev.) . g;he:~ting i::;~::-èl~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL A CTfON ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . F,n,.nce O.,eCIOI PZ 95-25, Page 2 · 7. Certificate of Occupancy: Mr. Bourland must apply for a Certificate of Occupancy upon approval of this Special Use Permit by the City Council. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this Special Use Permit request at its December 19, 1995 meeting and recommended approval subject to the owner providing space for three off- street parking spaces. RECOMMENDA TION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. ç- ~ · · · ORDINANCE NO. 2094 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO AUTHORIZE SPECIAL USE PERMIT NUMBER TWENTY-NINE (29) FOR A PERSONAL CARE HOME; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a Special Use Permit for a Personal Care Home; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Te~, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by changing said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore __ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. aHA T, Special Use Permit Number Twenty-Nine (29) be hereby authorized for a Personal Care Home as set forth in Case Number PZ 95-25 on the property described as follows: Being Lot 3, Block 1 R, Holiday West Addition, an Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-126, Page 93, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This propertY is located at 6909 Meadow Park North. 2. THAT, the development regulations contained in the R-3 Single Family zoning district of Ordinance 1874 shall govern development on said property, except where amended by this Ordinance. The regulations contained herein shall prevail over any inconsistencies with the regulations contained in Ordinance 1874. 3. THAT, the Personal Care Home listed in Section 1 above shall comply with the Special Land Use Regulations contained in Article 3, Section 320, (16) of the Zoning Ordinance Number 1874, except .here amended by this Ordinance as follows: a. Location: The location of the building on the lot and the building footprint shall be in accordance with the Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A". . PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY 1996. Mayor City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: ç ,- City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas . APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City . Ordinance No. 2094 Page 3 . . . PZ Minutes - Page 4 December 19,1995 4. PZ 95-25 Request of Paul Bourland for a Special Use Permit for a Personal Care Home on Lot 3, Block 1 R, Holiday West Addition. (Located at 6909 Meadow Park North) Mr. LeBaron stated a Personal Care Home requires a Special Use Permit in this zoning district. He stated the applicant is present. Chairman Barfield opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the request to come forward at this time. Mr. Paul Bourland, 6909 Meadow Park North, came forward to speak. He stated he is a home health nurse and emergency room nurse. He stated he has patients in similar facilities in Fort Worth and other cities. He stated the only person with a car is the resident care giver. He stated there would be about five persons in this home. Mr. Bourland stated that the persons living in the facility are those that need some care since they cannot live alone, but do not need full time nursing care in a larger institution. He stated the presence of persons in the neighborhood during the day could be a plus for crime prevention. Mr. Lueck a~ìfè(twhat is the average age of the residents. Mr. Bourland stated theyare generally 55 years and older. He stated he will not be living at the house when it is renovated. Chairman Barfield asked if the garage was enclosed. - Mr. Bourland stated the previous qwner finished out the garage with heat/air, electricitY, and carpeti ng. Chairman Barfield stated his concerns about inadequate parking. He stated the applicant should provide a larger parking area, such as a circular drive. Mr. Bourland stated a circular driveway is not a problem. He stated four cars will fit in the driveway. He stated parking has not been a problem at other facilities. Mr. Lueck stated a circular driveway may not be worth the expense and it may detract from the property. He asked if it was possible to limit the number of cars allowed at this residence. Ms. Spicer asked if there have been complaints about parking at the other facilities in the city. Mr. LeBaron stated no. Mr. Bourland stated the facility will be licensed by the State and must meet special requirements for life safety codes and other regulations. There was general discussion regarding the parking situation on the property. There being no one else wishing to speak in favor of the request, Chairman Barfield asked for those wishing to speak in opposition to the request to come forward at this time. Mr. Victor MacDougall, 5544 Meadow Oak, came forward to speak. He stated his opposition to allowing a business in a residential zoning district. Mr. Lueck stated there are other businesses that are allowed in residential districts. Chairman Barfield stated that the State preempts most local zoning ordinances in regards to homes such as these. He stated they could care for three people without getting a permit from the city or state. P2~·25 . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAIÐ HILLS APPLICATION FOB A SPECIAL USE PERMIT 7301 N,E. LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLÃNo HILLS, TEXAS Please print all responses 761110 817-581-5504 PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION NAUE OF APPUCANT I AGENT: Paul B. Bourland STREET ADDRESS OF APPUCANT: 6909 Meadow Park N. CITY I STATE I ZlP OF APPUCANT: TELEPHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: N. Richland HillS, TX 76180 817-788-1447 PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATIQN NAUE OF PROPERTY ONNER: Paul B. Bourland STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER: 6909 Meadow Park N. CITY I STATE I ZIP OF PROPERTY OWNER: TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER: N. Richland HillS, TX 76180 817-788-1447 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY WHERE SPECIAL USE PERWT IS BEING REQUESTED: Lot 3, Block 1R, Holiday West Addition STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION WHERE SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS BEING REOUESTED: 6909 Meadow Park N. , N. Richland HIlls, Tx 76180 PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION: PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: R3 Personal Care Home ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ATTACH SITE PUN PER SPECIFICATIONS ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FDRM: ATTACH AFFIDAVIT FROM PROPERTY OWNER IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER: CXJ YES CJ NO c:::J YES CJ NO I hereby certify that the foregoing information is correct to the best of my knowledge. DATE: 11/01/95 A~4 dtt~~ ¿~£ Your Name (printed) Paul B. Bourland Signature , PART 4. OFFICE USE ONLY P & Z PUBUC HENlING DA TE: TAXES PAID? CASE NUMBER: DYES DNo CITY COUNCIL HENlING DA TE: LIENS PAID? DYES DNo FEE $300.00 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APROVED: ASSESSMENTS PAID? CJ YES CJ NO OAD, NO. DYES DNo Thi. applic.tion w~1 not b. och.Q¡I.d fa public hawing un" Ih. application Condition. of ApprOllllt f.. i. received. SPECIAL USE PERMIT PIogo 1 01 2 . . CO-414 (4-93) . . . City of North Richland Hills Planning & Zoning Department The reason for this application for Special Use Permit is to establish a Personal Care Home. The purpose of this Home is to provide a living facility in which housing, meals, assistance with activities of daily living and protective supervision are provided for individuals who cannot, or prefer not to, live alone but do not need typical institutional care. Our goal is to provide a familY-like atmosphere for older perso~who no longer feel safe or comfortable living alone but still function independently for the most part. Paul B. Bourland 6909 Meodow Park No. No. Rlchlond Hills, TX 761lJO.66()9 . . . Request for Waiver I request the garage enclosure that currently exists be allowed to remain in its present configuration. This modification has been present for some time. The area is not needed to store automobiles and would be useful as an activity room for residents. Paul B. Bourland 6909 MeGdow Pork No. No. Rlchland Hills. TX 7618(}66()9 . PLAT MAP . f'ï~ ~ . '00 '0 ."" '0' M .. ., " .. ". .., . 3 , 3 '3A ~ .. .. 0>, 19 ! ... ,. " . ., ..' ~ ~ ~ " ... nh '5 ~ .5 ~ .. '5' ." 3... ! ~ 36·" U ;J .. ! "" .., ... " 0 ~3'''' .. ~ . ... U ., i ., ~ ~j . " " .. .. 30 .to ." .,. . . . . " .0' ". .OA. '0 lO UIWIOAO ~ ., .3 " . .. .. .. ., , I '0 ~ '" .. ! .. .. ~ ~~ '0 . . .. ·to .. ! .. q ~ '.... ~ ~ '... 50' ,. ;J .. '0' >0 .. !Wi :01,1' ,. ~ ~ ~ U 3" ,. . I', ð ,.. .. ,., I" " 3 ,.. ... " 1" ." 1> 13 .. .. ,. ,. I~ ~ ~ ·~ce: Ii~\..\.." Ii Ii \.JRVe: 6 5 100 V NOR'I't1 c.CTOoII .. ., . 3 ., .3 .. I.. .. I ., ,. '0 " '. .5 ' 0 " ., ,. ,. " .. :5 ., .. I ., ., t . '5 -3 .. ,. -. i ,. " .. § . . '. 8 ., I¡ '" .. >0 ~ ,. ~ lO ... t' .. ~ ; l' " .. " i .. 11 3 I 11 '3 " .. ,. rTT1TTl I , , I ¡..-.- . , 14 ~ . 8R ~í5 \ G" ; S 00II o~r~ , GØJ 4 A.,IE'lIlfÚ"Ø~'C"' H'C' ()COP'A1ûM1 'i'7 . BURDETTE & COMPANY, INC. Reai Estate Appraisers · Consultants Paul B. Bourland 6909 Meødow Park No. No. Rich/and Hills, TX 76180-6609 RUG - 24 95 1 9 : ('6 rr M : DOWDY LAND 5LJRVEYORS 81758'3036'1 TO: F1r'1ER I CRNTI TLEHAPWUOO PAGE: 01 -- BLOCK 32R I HOl.lOAY I'/tST .\CO'N. ~C:RO(,\ '" ~8.!!-1~6/171, . ...:. ...' > ". : ,:·:··~S.89 41. E.. Vrq :..'... '. ~ ---" ~'-' '. ..-...... .. '. /.~. .",~.:". .' " ' Ç~~C~E'i ~ j(AI~"'~....,. " . . ..,. . . .... .', ,:.' :",:- .... .'. ...... .,...:.':.,> ;-~'.:..:' ....,....:.:.;.:.. "', ......... . ,... ..,..,. ,,:',"':.": ;.". ,'. / . :....~\..<..:'.:<...:. I"~ ...·..O.~A.IN,.\C( £AS(MC/H J,M-1'Z6/9):.·· ......... ..., -/ .': ·"'f"',':,···: "--' '. .,. ...,:...,. ". ..:.... : '. '" -:~~::~~<±/.~-:-.~.:¿;.~"....::: .'.:. ':.r:::>:: '.' .. \ '.' I(J'UT '., ,., '- _' ' n,~..... ~ ..:.:.~.,. ........ lur"":-'!'~),f ........,... ,'. ;--0,:' ~,' ',' '." ,... ::--\ "'-'-'--'-.,~" "II 3 ~ -.,.- ...._""='.: ;;- _ _ . . CI'~-Z6/9J _ '- "'- ! -;~a. ~)!- ...,:'\"~ - - -L'Q' T - - - -'... --I" -- -- '-" ,3 ~ J "'\ r~· .... ,.;':< ....1 ~ \ I," :. '.\ ';' ····1 v-) ;r ;~i~~:~ 1~ z l ;~~«>¿. "'~'Y';;;/~0/; ~¡r. ~ 1_:»:_///// ///// / / /:; "" /~;/~'l4;~%//~;/~ ~~~ ~x- / /./,~ / / ~. "r, .~ / / / / / / / .. " / . /'.,,' / / / // // / ,~.,. ,'\ .,'-:. . U /'n ' / /// / / ,":: ~ ~///// /" ":,~ ./ / /' ./,,,.' "! / ,:0.1/ / .:! _·t.~:~..;:.:....:,·~~~ .'. SJ ". ,. .:,":. ": .r··..-·· ' .". . 33 .}88-156/17 32 . ~1J6-156/'7 X IN' ~. / X It CC>lCRrT! .. I, " 'J ,,'.. '." ~. '10 .... . - --- ~o· ORA!NAC( ! A~¡l ~I.N; I·l? vOl.r,M~. P(;.'. ".' .~ .... .- I}' ViiLI(Y (^S£~~OIT PER YQl.688~. PG,iA ') o .I/In 17fi/~.' 4 368-126/9) . ;~5 8UI\.[)IN~, -\ iNf ' ---- - -- > è ~~> ,~. ".'< -~.i;'::,;; ~('H.:!.: ~J..;,~~.~. /J(MiOW rK // 1/7" In ("1,-/ ...------......... ¡-f .:,. 0":: :t', ....\. to .-.. ",. ("4 .." '::":/:.:-:-::.-::.": : ... ':'.:'.: ":':",; [ OIRECrlQNAL CONTROL ,tN( ,......_.~ - - '.' ';':<';'" ,/ N SC'41 'lA' ~/7.0' )" .:.," .' I I. '" n. ---" ,/<:~: ::,:: ~'.:....:.\>- _.....-. -----.... .''''--:t 1/"" ·,R. rHO, -:-:-~:-'-.--......._ ._....:=:;:t /,J:'C;'fìHO . 6909 MEADOW PARK NCRTH , t,..cc OIJCA~[AC; cue. .. -~ TCI.C"Þ40ÞlC .--'"'--'"- r, .. .' .: - I h·~'---~ I :"=""ooõ= ~ ':f~~'lt\) ~U""~f. ~. R~l'f.:~-:V(~.~'G~..:~Ll "'~r.l:'l".I1·~W.la~~:l!5ï:·'~~~.~.I'T.~~~.~oo::rrr2 081("IC WALL _.':'I_":I:IC~"I~~,·...t- ~t..~..........~ ... = (,(IW'"~~ WOHUIJC"T) ! 1 3. Block -R. HOLIDAY WEST ADDITION. to the City ot Nor!h Ricl\IOlld I ill,. Torronl Counly, Taxos, according 10 tn. Plol recard.d in Volunlß .66-126. PlJl)ð !}J, Plot Rocord" Tarrant Counly. Toxo$. ,.\.I'rordr^1 f" Ihe FIRY Unp "~4. l.\"nlf!d In a :pocfal "ðCH~ ~.11t) 1:ló·Ff.'Nf.'NCE NI): 4-\0215 U',v/lt:'S' IJERCANTlU eAN 'lira' 1.:0. AMERIÇÀN 1! III µU}U:J.I,\:·~NI ~OI)RU"Q Uti J'J:: a I 0 'J ~ H a"l.ð: S-~-Ö5. "I. proø.rly I, "ot T"'I. fir"!""".,, Is o(CIl~d in '\0"" 'I... 51IRV[rrJRS çrnr!rI(,ATIQN n,. I,ndDr~lgnld l1aqi:¡l.rod rroluuiotlol LunLJ ~u'It....or clSlililf~ lu µutt,;huut, ltnda, Qno ¡!III C¡)n,pofty a. I\DMOd I"ot~ (A) this plat ~, .surd',' and ¡h. proþ,rly thU~rlpl1~" ul fð,.,h ".'O~ ðr. d tru. "p',.u"tO'''H\ I" 1(1('"1 'o..,,,,d ,,1 lhr. II,,,,,, "I nn nctuol on-I"C-IJr'QUr.rl1UNny: (it) ,\,1(" 'u'v~y ."1 t.:t"^~UC~(J by Itu '3U,....yo,. 6t l,rld", hi, 'ltD.,v"It')fI: {C\ Inu, I]r. "" víslbh, t"croac;hmtrI1, (ò,11H,'" Ihortnou '" grea or boundor'f ~"'/I,' nCÐp' Of ~""Q""; (0) the prap('''~ hl;l' oC!("("o 10 13 public: strt'rl oJl'lru alherwlu noted: ([;. '"'"' Hood 111'''''''4"1 llo,..", till HI' ~01' r'le.'" tJ'7O o..oilaol" 10 Ihf :furvlyor. JI',j "",hile Ihi:; ;VNUV ,"or shu", In_ 'Jrgp..d, no! 10 b. in Q Cip..cöi'O/ flood rhltu,rJ Que. "U lO".' rnay br Ju~l('cI to 10me dtgree or 00('ldl"9. tor mor. 111(!'),,,,ol~n <;\)f'lh.1Cf yo",r Intol floed plain adml"Ir.lroior or tnQ rodua~ (mGfge"cy 1..':Jno9cm_nl ^Y."'y: (f) r.lloKh 'tt;lltl"".nIJ ::JUlcI('\9 tk.. ~rop"r1y. o\tjd4nca oJ{ .hich i'l ...j,ibt. 01'\ 11"1.. grouruj, or of .,..Ncn 1".. '''',......~(\( }'I<11 11(501 110111;1. ok TRU')T C(JIoIPMlY - ROL>.N(1 ROD~ICI(? .' ~ 1550 ,'!ORWOOD, sum: 4\ 0 Hl)RS T, TEX,\$ 7605 ~ (817) 589- 71 07 ':'þ :£! £6. :3::: Sr:~ TOd ¿88 (Iccr'1':JI:'H 3l1.! 1. !,.I:J 7C:O-¿¿S; # . . . . 48' 35'6" Bedroan 16'x121 Converted Garage 20 x 22 3.5 x 6 2 x 4 469 Sq. Ft. 20'1" 10' 2'6" fFP\ 0 2'6" 12' It Bkfst. Bedroan Family Rocm 1114"x11'11" 191x151 1\ e CL [1tJ 0 gl CL Bedroan Dining Bedroom 3'8" 11'4"x111 37'8" 4' 4' 8'8" 2x2 2x2 9'3" 11 12'9" o o w D WH ...- ~ - . 11'6" 2.5 x 10 37.5 x 36.5 1 x 12.5 -2 x 2 x .5 x 2 -3.5 x 6 22.5 x 20 3.5 x 10 1.5x4 1872.25 Sq. Ft. LivinG Area Paul B. Bourland 6909 Meadow Parle No. No. RfchlGlld Hills, TX 76180-6609 . . . J._ · PETITION RE: Case Applicant: Address: Special Use Permit for a Personal Care Home #PZ 95-25 Paul Bourland 6909 ,\leadoVl Park North We oppose request for the reason that it will possibly depreciate our property values. We in alternative would like to postpone this matter in order to give us time to get more informatiol! from the State Regulatory Commission and other sources. Signature: Date: Address: ~~~~~, tt1;" j¥J l!X~ j- 3-'1~ , U 1ffY'(;1 / 7 9 b ~ - ¡-rJ .~ () 0 j¡AI//f1l/41}~. #o,.'¿~JlÁß"'ddA,¿..5 "'7(;/,;10 --;3/~F ,-;;¡'~tJ~~c¿tL/7lc.lJld4 7t/9ò 01 -OL- c¡ £, a - l./ tND~ (-r£c( JJ(é. AJt/./ /. . C ç,o t-\o..vo-""~V"') )J, ~ ~, l( > ì " ( RfO 5(P,{)/~ ~iJ.J]'l...Ij 7Jj '7cú/ð'Q S¿;L9 1i~~fi/;;;¡ ~/YÓ 50 [J() /eklj)¿ ~ '{ __~ J;t 7H:it C f / ¿,I(~~- ~k IJ If N lA 1(lrfb ~._. __.H__ ..___ ------------------.--.-...- ...-- --. "--'-'-'~"- --------- .-----. --- - -------_. ..- . PETITION RE: Case Applicant: Address: Special Use Permit for a Personal Care Home #PZ 95-25 Paul Bourland 6909 Meadow Park North We oppose request for the reason that it will possibly depreciate our property values. We in alternative would like to postpone this matter in order to give us time to get more information. from the State Regulatory Commission and other sources. Date: Address: / - 2- 9/ -d,9¿ AlR.;-i l-7.--1~ / 3- q(, 1- ~~ '1 C:, SSt.fç WooDV i{:--z.,U :; ~ I.{-o ~13> -------- , ~ . PETITION RE: Case Applicant: Address: Special Use Permit for a Personal Care Home #PZ 95-25 Paul Bourland 6909 1\leadoVl Park North We oppose request for the reason that it will possibly depreciate our property values. We in alternative would like to postpone this matter in order to give us time to get more informatioll from the State Regulatory Commission and other sources. Signature: Date: Address: ~;/. ¡J~ ,~~ ~~<1y ¿4/ ~~~- O/JI'A'n~dJ~ -ç- /;}'/30/95 , ,. / .;:i¡j ~ / 9~- / ' , /2/Yo/'7J- 1-2-9~ 55't.)O /'U.ójJe,¿J/)t/¿ ;lI¡¿/) 7i 7~/ to ~Y¿/~/ ~AC£;uJ tJAi< /lK'fI Tx 7(p¡Po t,90)Jz(~d/)A fð-rK llfll ~y ;;£(/0 $0/ /J!éf;¡)~ !øf¡¿ ¡/¿/~ ïZ· 1¿,Irf'õ . --_.- ------.-----------.. -------- --- ...-.... .~- -. .-, -- -- . -. --.--------------- ----. ------ .-. ... . epartmen t: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Inspections 1/08/96 - Council Meeting Date: Public Hearing to consider the request of HSM Development PZ 95-26 to rezone Tracts 3, 3A3, 3A4, .3A3A, 38, 3A3B, é:H1d 4A 1, Agenda Number: Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from AG Agriculture to a Pla.nned Development. (Located in the 7000 block of Hightower Drive) Subject: Ordinance No. 2095 HSM Development is the developer of an 85.55 acre tract of land located in the 7300 block of Hightower Drive, west of Little Ranch Road. The property owner is Billy Graham, who resides on the property. The property is presently zoned AG Agriculture, and the developer has submitted an application to change the zoning classification to a Planned Development with residential uses. The property is 85.55 acres in size. It encompasses an area between Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive, west of the Calloway Branch drain~e channel. The property will be split into two separate areas by a drainage channel running east and IÑëst ac~oss the property. The two areas will have separate development conditions and requirements, as follows: __ . Tract I (north of channel) 1. Lots around the perimeter of Tract I that have no alleys will be restricted to a maximum of one front entry garage per every four lots. The other three lots must provide front-swing, side or rear entry garages. - - 2. Typical lots with alleys will be 65' x 125' or a minimum of 8,000 square foot lots. 3. Typical lots without alleys will be 70' x 125' or a minimum of 8,500 square foot lots. 4. All houses will be restricted to a minimum of 2,000 square feet of living area. 5. All lots will have a minimum of 60 feet of width at the building line. 6. Alleys in easements as shown: 15 foot easement with 10 foot pavement. Tract" (south of channel) 1. Typical lots will be 65' x 125' or a minimum of 8,000 square foot lots. 2. All lots may have front entry access. 3. All houses will be restricted to 1,800 square feet of living area. 4. All lots will have a minimum of 60 feet of width at the front building line. The attached zoning exhibit shows a preliminary layout of streets, lots and drainage improvements. Based on the above described restrictions, the property could be subdivided into about 275 lots, resulting in a density of 3.21 dwelling units per acre. For comparison, the R-1 zoning district density is typically 2.9 units per acre, and the R-2 district is 4.0 units per acre. The developer also proposes to construct masonry screening walls along this property's frontage on Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive. One lot in the development is proposed as a park, providing access to future hike and bike trails. A Preliminary Plat of the property will be submitted upon approval of the zoning change. Finance Review ~ource of Funds: .Bo.nds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot he r . a:=;;: ./? /J ____ ~...~ ~ {)......- /¿/'""~ Departme t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acet. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Ftn..nc:e OHector PZ 95-26, Page 2 .he surrounding land areas are mostly residential in character. The area to the east is zoned R-1-S Special Single Family Residential and mostly consists of large acreage tracts. The area to the south is zoned R-3 Single Family Residential, and includes the Richfield and North Park Estates subdivisions. The area to the west is zoned C-1 Commercial and is presently vacant. The area to the north is split between several zoning districts: R-7-MF Multi-Family (vacant), R-4-D Duplex residential, and R-2-1400 Single Family Residential. Foster Village Elementary School is located immediately north of this proposed development. The Master Thoroughfare Plan indicates a proposed C2U Minor Collector street running north/south through this property. The developer's proposed layout does not include this street. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that a collector type street. with a 60-foot right-of-way. be required through this development to connect Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive. The Commission also required that this collector street be constructed in a curvilinear fashion. In a 1987 survey, the Institute of Transportation Engineers found that, for single family detached dwelling units, the average number of trips generated on a weekday was 10.1 trips per dwelling unit. A development of 275 lots could generate approximately 2,750 trips per day when fully developed. 'ç- This property abuts Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive. The portion of Hightower Drive between Rufe Snow Drive and the Calloway Branch channel has been designated for improvement by the Capita/Improvements Plan committee. The developer will be required to construct the portion of Hightower Drive adjacent to this property. Chapman Drive is already improved. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this zoning change request at its December 19, 1995 8'neeting and recommended approval subject to the following requirements and modifications: a collector-type .street with 60-feet of right-of-way be provided through the development with a curvilinear design; more cul-de- sac lots be shown in Tract" (south); the lots in Tract" (south) be a minimum of 7,000 square feet with an average lot size of 7,700 square feet; the four access points to the hike and bike trail be shown on the preliminary plat; the front building lines be 25-feet; the rear building lines be 15-feet on lots without alleys; the rear building lines be 20-feet on lots with alleys; the side building lines be 6 feet on all lots; a 20% rear yard open space be required; and no front entry garages be allowed on the collector street. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. . ORDINANCE NO. 2095 . AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ESTABLISH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER TWENTY-ONE (21); PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a zoning district change to a Planned Development; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. ç- THAT, Planned Development District NumberT~enty-One (21) be hereby established in the Case Number PZ 95-26, on the following described property: BEING a tract of land out of the William Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1010, Tarrant County, Texas, being a portion of a 37.001 acre tract of land described in a deed to Billy J. Graham and wife Ernestine Graham by deed recorded in Volume 4204, Pogo 116, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and portion of a 47.254 acre tract of land described in a deed to Billy J. Graham and wife Ernestine Graham by deed recorded in Volume 7627, Page 292, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and all of a tract of land described in a deed to Anita Hall and Michael Franklin Hall recorded in Volume 5859, Page 550, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: . BEGINNING at a point in Hightower Drive for the northwest corner of the said 37.001 acre Graham tract, being by deed call in the south line of the J. Condra Survey, Abstract No. 311 and in the north line of the said William Mann Survey, THENCE South 89 degrees 45 minutes East, 512 feet along Hightower Drive to a point for the northwest corner of a 3.0 acre tract of land described in a deed to Billy J. Graham and wife Ernestine Graham by deed recorded in Volume 4204, Page 114, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 51 minutes 25 seconds East, 208 feet along the south line of Hightower Drive to an angle point; THENCE South 89 degrees 58 minutes 42 seconds East, at 175.42 feet passing the northwest corner of said Hall Tract, at 384.13 feet passing the northeast corner of said Hall Tract and the northwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to Billy J. Graham and wife Ernestine Graham by deed recorded in Volume 7392, Page 101, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, in all 547,21 feet to a point in Hightower Drive for the northeast corner of the 1.63 acre Graham tract and the northwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to J.W. Bailey and wife, Barbara Bailey recorded in Volume 5359, Page 554 and Volume 5923, Page 321, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 03 minutes 20 seconds West, at 30.0 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod set in the south line of Hightower Drive, in all 378.88 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar rod found for the southwast corner of the said Bailey tract; . THENCE South 89 degrees 50 minutes 19 seconds East, 226.06 feet along the south line of the Bailey tract to a 1/2- inch rebar rod found for its southeast corner, THENCE North 01 degrees 41 minutes 49 seconds East, at 345.82 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod set in the south line of Hightower Drive, in all 375.82 feet to a point for the northeast corner of the Bailey tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 54 minutes 15 seconds East, 19.91 feet to a point for the northwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to Walter Charles Williamson and Debra Denae Williamson recorded in Volume 10378, Page 1915, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 01 degrees 41 minutes 49 seconds West, at 30.0 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod set in the south line of Hightower Drive, in all 375.80 feet to a fence post for the southwest corner of the said Bailey tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds East. 151.0 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar rod found for the southeast corner of the said Bailey tract; THENCE North 02 degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds East, at 345.25 feet passing the south line of Hightower Drive, at 354.98 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod found, in all 375.25 feet to a point for the northeast corner of the Bàiley tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 54 minutes 15 seconds East, 49.79 feet to a point for the northwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to Ezra E. Bland and wife, Amma Bland recorded in Volume 4777, Page 499, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 02 degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds West, at 20.27 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod found, at 30.0 feet passing the approximate south line of Hightower Drive, in all 374.50 feet to a 1/2-inch pipe found for the southwest corner of the said Bland tract; ç THENCE South 89 degrees 50 minutes 19 seconds East, at 311.5 feet passing the southeast corner of the Bland tract and the southwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to A. Hubert Hawkins recorded in Volume 8903, Page 566, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, in all 544.64 feet to a 1/4-inch rebar rod found for the southeast corner of the Hawkins tract being in the west line of Morgan Meadows Addition to the City of North Richland Hills according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-13, Page 50, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 05 minutes 46 seconds East, 1568.77 feet along the east line of Morgan Meadows Addition to a 1/2-inch rebar rod found for the northeast corner of a tract of land described in a deed to Jerry R. Winter~ and wife Shirley G. Winters recorded in Volume 6550, Page 882, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 18 minutes 10 seconds West, 199.78 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar rod found for the northwest corner of the Winters tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 04 minutes 58 seconds East, 519.91 feet along the west line of the Winters tract to a 1/2- inch rebar rod found for the northeast corner of a tract of land described in a deed to T. Jeff Graham and wife, Vickie D. Graham recorded in Volume 7825, Page 579, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 15 minutes 54 seconds West, 300.0 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar rod set for the northwest corner of the T. Jeff Graham tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 15 minutes East, 168.03 feet along the west line of the T. Jeff Graham tract to a 1/2-inch rebar rod set in the north line of Chapman Drive for the northeast corner of a tract of land described in deed to the City of North Richland Hills recorded in Volume 8120, Page 1710, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 47 minutes West, 449.17 feet along the north line of Chapman Drive and the north line of the North Richland Hills tract to an 'X' cut in concrete found for the northwest corner of the North Richland Hills tract and the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Richfield Subdivision, an Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-169, Page 18, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 00 degrees 09 minutes 54 seconds West, 1302 feet along the east line of Block 1 of said Richfield Subdivision to a 1/2-inch rebar rod set for the northeast corner of Lot 18, Block 1; THENCE West (base bearing by deed in Vol. 4204, Page 116, D.R.T.C.Tx.). 1306.59 feet to 1/2-inch rebar rod set for the northwest corner of Lot 27, Block 6, Richfield Subdivision, being the southeast corner of a tract of land described in a deed to HKEM#2 - Tom Ellis & Ted Pittman by deed recorded in Volume 7861, Page 915, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Ordinance No, 2095 Page 2 THENCE North 00 degrees 08 minutes West, at 1320.21 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod set for the northeast corner of the said HKEM#2 tract, in all 1345,0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 85,55 acres of land, more or less. . This property is located in the 7000 block of Hightower Drive, west of Little Ranch Road, 2. THAT, the development regulations for Planned Development District Number Twenty-One (21) shall be as follows: 1. Purpose: Planned Development District Number Twenty-One is intended to provide for single family detached residential dwelling units. 2. Permitted Uses: Single family detached dwelling units, community center, and park land, 3. Subdivision Design Criteria: A collector-type street with a 60-foot right-of-way shall be provided through this development, connecting Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive. The street shall be designed in a curvilinear fashion. The general layout of Tract" (sol$...9f the proposed drainage channel) shall consist of as many cul-de-sacs as feasible in order to keep the number of lots fronting on the collector street to a minimum. 4. Development Restrictions: Planned Development Number 29 shall be divided into two distinct development areas. Tract I shall be the area north of the proposed drainage channel shown on the Site Plan. Tract II shall be the area south of the proposed drainage channel shown on the Site Plan. - . The following development restrictions shall apply to Tract I: A. Lot and Area Requirements Minimum Lot Area: Lots with alleys 8,000 square feet Lots without alleys 8,500 square feet Minimum Lot Width Lots with alleys 65 feet Lots without alleys 70 feet Minimum Lot Depth: 125 feet Minimum Front Building Line: 25 feet Minimum Side Building Line: 6 feet Minimum Rear Building Line: Lots with alleys 20 feet Lots without alleys 10 feet Minimum Dwelling Unit Size: 2,000 square feet Maximum Structure Height: 38 feet Rear Yard Open Space Area: A minimum of 20% of the total lot area shall be reserved as an open space in the rear portion of every yard, The open space shall extend from one side property line to another side property line, abutting the rear property line, and not protruding beyond the two most extreme corners of the main structure. No part of the residential building and/or dwelling unit may be constructed so as to occupy any portion of the open space rear yard. . B. Fences: As required by Article 9, Section 910, Walls and Fences, Ordinance No. 1874, as amended. Ordinance No. 2095 Page 3 C, Parking: Off-street parking space shall be provided on the lots to accommodate four cars for each dwelling unit. At least two of such spaces shall be covered; however, no supporting member of any garage, carport or other automobile storage structure shall be located within the required front building line. D. Accessory Buildings: As allowed by Article 6, Sections 600 F & G, Ordinance No. 1874, as amended. E. Garage Entry Requirements: Lots around the perimeter of Tract I that do not have alleys shall be restricted to a maximum of one front entry garage per every four lots. The remaining three lots shall have front-swing, side or rear entry garages. Lots with alleys shall be restricted to rear-entry garage access. F. Masonry Requirement: The exterior wall surface, as viewed from each primary elevation, of all permanent structures constructed in Planned Development Number 29 shall consist of at least seventy-five percent brick, stone, or if approved by the City Council, other masonry or materials of equal characteristics. For the purposes of this requirement, the exterior wall surface shall be defined as the area between the wall corners extending from the top of the foundation up to the door or window header height of the first floor, whichever is greater. The area of door and window openings shall not be included in the calculation of this requirement. The following development restrictions shall apply to Tract II: A. Lot and Area Requirement~ Minimum Lot Area: 7,000 square feet; however, the average lot size of all lots in Tract II r-shall be at least 7,700 square feet Minimum Lot Width 65 feet Minimum Lot Depth: 125 feet Minimum Front Building Line: 25 feet Minimum Side Building Line: 6 feet Minimum Rear Building Line: 1 0 feèt Minimum Dwelling Unit Size: 1,800 square feet Maximum Structure Height: 38 feet Rear Yard Open Space Area: A minimum of 20% of the total lot area shall be reserved as an open space in the rear portion of every yard. The open space shall extend from one side property line to another side property line, abutting the rear property line, and not protruding beyond the two most extreme corners of the main structure. No part of the residential building and/or dwelling unit may be constructed so as to occupy any portion of the open space rear yard. B. Fences: As required by Article 9, Section 910, Walls and Fences, Ordinance No. 1874, as amended. C. Parking: Off-street parking space shall be provided on the lots to accommodate four cars for each dwelling unit. At least two of such spaces shall be covered; however, no supporting member of any garage, carport or other automobile storage structure shall be located within the required front building line. D. Accessory Buildings: As allowed by Article 6, Sections 600 F & G, Ordinance No. 1874, as amended. E. Garage Entry Requirements: All lots in Tract II may be allowed front-entry garage access. However, lots facing the collector street shall not have front entry garage access. F. Masonry Requirement: The exterior wall surface, as viewed from each primary elevation, of all permanent structures constructed in Planned Development Number 29 shall consist of at least seventy-five percent brick, stone, or if approved by the City Council, other masonry or materials of equal characteristics. For the purposes of this requirement, the exterior wall surface shall be defined as the area between the wall corners extending from the top of the foundation up to the door or window header height of the first floor, whichever is greater. The area of door and window openings shall not be included in the calculation of this requirement. 5. Alleys: All alleys shall be constructed within a 15-foot easement located at the rear of the lots. The alley shall consist of 1 Q-feet of pavement constructed to street standards as required by the Public Works Design Manual. Ordinance No, 2095 Page 4 6. Hike and Bike Trail Access: Four access points to the proposed hike and bike trail along Calloway Branch shall be shown on the preliminary and final plats. . 3. THA T, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein. 4. THAT, all the regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance Number 1874, as amended, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Planned Development District Number Twenty-Nine (29), shall remain in effect regarding this property. 5. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is nï;reby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinancê are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invaliáôr unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. . SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. 6. 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 19th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1995. ~:l ~ ~ / (/t:tÞV·t¿;/~~#ý./-, Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission . c:~.--, ."'-~" . '-- ___i' '\ ~ ~--_...- - -"-.._- ,- ,.---\ , ----!--- '. ; ¡ ~.·..-I.....--_.~_.... Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 8th DAY OF JANUARY 1996. Ordinance No, 2095 Page 5 Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Tex, ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City ç ,- Ordinance No, 2095 Page 6 PZ Minutes - Page 5 December 19,1995 . . 5. PZ 95·26 . Mr. MacDougall asked how many bedrooms were in the house. Mr. Bourland stated four. Mr. Baxter stated the regulatory atmosphere has reached a point to where cities cannot pr exclude these types of uses in neighborhoods. He stated that is why there is a one-hal distance requirement between facilities. Mr. Mike Chaney, 5544 Shady Meadow, came forward to speak. nursing home in his neighborhood. Ms. Margaret McCarley, 5600 Havana Drive, came forward to speak. the request. She stated her concerns about increased traffic in the a There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield c Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PZ 95-25, subject to accommodate extra cars. The motion was seconde ç- circular driveway being constructed Mr. Baxter. Mr. Lueck stated his is n-ot convinced there is or w: e a traffic problem in the area. Mr. Davis stated most of the traffic comes fro Aires. e high school down Meadow Oak to Buenos Mr. Miller stated if had more iQ.sight i time, he might be in favor of a circ how many cars will sit at this property for long periods of driveway. Chairman Barfield stated the wheelchairs. way is too narrow to accommodate persons with crutches or in ion regarding the off-street parking issue. ariveway could be expanded to the property line to accommodate more cars. that the goal is to prevent the house from looking any different from the others in ood. He stated he would be opposed to making the driveway look like a parking lot. k stated they could reduce the requirement to three off-street parking spaces. Davis amended his original motion to approve PZ 95-25, subject to providing space for three -0. Public Hearing to consider the request of HSM Development to rezone Tracts 3, 3A3, 3A4, 3A3A, 3B, 3A3B, 3D and 4Al; Man Survey, Abstract 1010, from AG Agriculture to a Planned Development. (Located in the 7000 block of Hightower Drive) Mr. LeBaron stated the property in question is 85 acres in size. He stated the owner is requesting a Planned Development to accommodate residential uses. He stated the property would be split into two different areas with different restrictions, but only single family development would be allowed. He stated some lots would allow front entry access, and others would have alley access. Mr. LeBaron stated that the lots are generally R-2 type lots with R-l type housing. He stated that building setbacks and rear yard open space need to be addressed. Chairman Barfield opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the request to come forward at this time. Mr. Don Plunk, HSM Development, 5001 Spring Valley Road, Dallas, came forward to speak. He stated he is president of the development group. He stated they are requesting rezoning from PZ Minutes - Page 6 December 19,1995 agriculture to a planned development district. He stated they are requesting a planned development district because their proposal does not fit neatly into an existing zoning district. Mr Plunk described the proposed regulations. He stated that drainage patterns are one of the most pressing concerns with the proposed development. He stated a part of this development will take water from the north and divert it to the Calloway Branch channel. Mr. Plunk stated the development will provide access to the hike and bike trail, and provide a private community center for residents of the development. He stated 15% of the lots in tract one could have front entry access. He stated the density of the development is lower than the R-2 district. Mr. Plunk requested that the front building line be 25-feet, the rear building line be 15-feet on lots without alleys, the rear building line be 20-feet on lots with alleys, the side building lines be six feet, and that a 20% rear yard open space be required. He stated their development plan does not include a direct through street because of the number of lots facing the street. He stated circulation is provided through the area, but not a direct street. Mr. Plunk stated the development plan meets the concerns of the City Council from a previous meeting. He stated they are competing in a market with Watauga and south Keller. He requested approval of the request. There being no one else wishing to speak in favor of the request, Chairman Barfield asked for those wishing to s¡::>eak in opposition to the request to come forward at this time. c:::_ Mr. Jerrell Stout, 7216 Chapman Drive, came forward to speak. He asked if there were plans to improve the drainage clíånnel at Chapman Drive. Mr. Plunk stated no, the channel has already been designed for future development upstream. Mr. Stout stated his concerns é!bout the ability of the channel to accommodate additional water. Mr. Davis stated the city has plans to expand the Calloway Branch channel. He stated the developer is taking the water to a recognized watercourse as required by the city. He stated the city is responsible for designing a channel that has the capacity to carry the water being fed into the channel. Mr. Steve Lane, 6848 Megan Lane, came forward to speak. He asked if the land would be graded evenly with his property. He stated the land is already higher than his rear yard. Mr. Davis stated there will most likely be some grading. Mr. Lane asked if there is a bridge proposed from the Richfield neighborhood to provide access for children to walk to school. Mr. Plunk stated they will be dedicating additional right-of-way for the expansion of the Calloway Branch drainage channel. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Lueck stated his concern about front entry garages. He stated Little Ranch Road probably cannot carry any more traffic. He stated there is a need for a north/south road in this area. Mr. Plunk stated this development would not put any more traffic on Little Ranch Road since it provides direct access to Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive. Mr. Baxter stated his concern about the need for another collector street. He stated the connection to the trail systems is an asset to this development and to the city. Chairman Barfield stated that collector streets are needed in this area. He stated he has no problem with the front entry garages if they were set back from the building line. Mr. Davis asked how wide a C2U right-of-way is. PZ Minutes - Page 7 December 19,1995 . 6. PS 95-38 . 7. PS 95-39 8. PS 95-44 . Mr. LeBaron stated 60-feet of right-of-way and 41-feet of pavement. Mr. Plunk stated his major concern is a visible straight shot between Hightower and Chapman. Mr. Davis stated they could split the street in widths of rights-of-way from north to south. Mr. Baxter stated a more curved street would be a better solution. Mr. Plunk stated there will be lots fronting on this through street. He stated the lots in the south end may need to be 7,000 square feet to accommodate cul-de-sacs to keep lots from fronting a collector street. Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PZ 95-26 subject to the following requirements: a collector-type street with 60-feet of right-of-way be provided through the development with a curvilineardesign; more cul-de-sac lots be shown in Tract II (south); the lots in Tract II be a minimum of 7,000 square feet with an average lot size of 7,700 square feet; the four access points to the hike and bike trail be shown on the preliminary plat; the front building lines be 25-feet; the rear buildin~lines be 15-feet on lots without alleys; the rear building lines be 20-feet on lots with alleys; the siCfe'"building lines be 6 feet on all lots; a 20% rear yard open space be required; and no front entry garages be âllowed on the collector street. The motion was seconded by Mr. Miller. The motion carried 6-0; ed at ortheast corner of Smithfield Road and North Tarrant Parkway) Mr. Le on stated this is a 44-acre tract of land zoned R-2 single family. He stated the developer has agree all comments except for one street intersection that does not meet the criteria. Mr. Davis stat he Commission should not enforce the provisions the Little Bear Creek corridor ordinance for thi at since it was submitted prior to that being adopted. Mr. Lueck asked that involved in the develop minutes reflect the Commission's concern since was not notified or t or approval of the flood plain ordinance for Little Bear Creek. Mr. Davis made the motion t prove PS 95-38 subject to engineers comments, with the waiver of the street intersection. The 'on was seconded by Mr. Lueck. The motion carried 5-0, with Ms. Spicer abstaining due to finan I involvement in the property. Request of Robert McCauley and Steven ster for Replat of Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Walker Branch Addition. (Located at 8851 Grapevine HigH Mr. Baxter made the motion to approve PS 95- was seconded by Ms. Spicer. The motion carried The motion Request of Pack Properties for Preliminary Plat of Five St ord Addition. (Located at the southwest corner of Rufe Snow Drive and N E Loop 820) Mr. LeBaron stated this is a 19 acre tract zoned C-2 Commercia d 1-2 Medium Industrial. He stated the only issue involves sewer service to a small lot at the no west corner. He stated if approved as proposed, the lot will not have sewer service. Mr. Davis asked if the developer would agree to a note on the plat to not permits on Lot 5 until all utility services have been provided. Zoning Case Review Fact Sheet Case No. PZ 95-26 PUBLIC HEARING DATES: Planning and Zoning Commission: December 14, 1995 City Council: January 8, 1996 REQUEST: AG Agriculture to PO Planned Development APPLICANT: HSM Development, Dallas TX PROPERTY OWNER: Billy Graham, North Richland Hills TX SIZE AND LOCATION: Approximately 85.50 acres located in the 7000 block of Hightower Drive, west of Little Ranch Road. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Existing house and accessory buildings. Very few trees. Existing ponds loc~d in the northwest and south portions of the property. Property generally slopeS-to the ßouth. -- PROPOSED USE: Single family residences ALLOWED USE: Planned Development uses are stated in the adopting ordinance. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES North South East West R-7-MF, R-4-D, and R-2-1400: existing duplexes, single family residences and school R-3-1500 and R-3: existing single family residences R-1-S: existing single family residences and acreage tracts C-1: vacant commercial property DRAINAGE Flood Insurance Rate Maps indicate that the south portion of the property lies within both the 100-year and 500-year flood plains. THOROUGHFARE PLAN Primary access to this property is from Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive. LAND USE MASTER PLAN The Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan calls for low density single family development in this area. This request is consistent with the plan. ZONING HISTORY This property was initially zoned AG Agriculture in 1967. No zoning change requests have been submitted on this property. PLATTING HISTORY This property is currently unplatted. The developer will submit a Preliminary Plat of this property at a future date. ~/'/' ","'':::.''''.'....,;.\I~~lffi@W - \...." " , '-'g""'.- - . ;"'m" ~~..,,;:";'--' .. =' . p. m, ~À /". ~. ': '" _¡CK" "" ; = ; = ; = õ. = ~ ~ . · . ~ .~ ,,++0 . - , _ . - . I ,; ULITJI] : '; : ÓJ ; =; :. :'. \ '" 19.:- = ·-:,p''''·...õ· .: .. L.:l.:l.:ll±lJ -èoo<.~ =, =, -. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ · ' : I =1.= = : , ; - . . . ". ~ I· . ; T: -- . . . -.: - . - õ- . \ ¡= 'w . " W S:d -l ... "\ .~ ~ : I . æ' ~': - : : : I ¡ i " ..~ ,.. :: CD I ffi æ" E~:} - 1-· g.: - .~'-:-. - -:-1-:" -,¡¡¡¡,;s..,;;oo -:Pn~~--I~~ - - - - ~.: -.-=-.- ~.~ UC-r--=---- "'" ::: 1= @..-;9-:I:. ,. r ;" ~" L I :¡ '-'\.;' ~~r ;-; \?~" '" ;. i; I ;. -. :j- -1- -1-1-· -.. ~~_ \_;:1_1::1,.:.1.1..: .....=,/. ;. .. I a_ OfloOSSEAAT Sf _ a .. -11- :J.: ï1· .... -.. ~ I / ; ~ : /: = : , :/ t : I: = : i . . - - 1""'FFIf':' CIA. _ ± I : .Oo' - i : : i :: .~.: i -.;.. _ I +~)'I- + . -. - ~'·."I_- ~ ~ ; : ~IL~~~~~r! : - = or _ :. 0 : -_ . .;': ~ ~ __ ~¡-;"'.' I . '-- = ~ 9 - - '-'-- ;., :_. I ~r-:- - ~ - i ::: 3:; _ _::- :.. _ ~.~ I( I ~ -=- ~~ I ... ~ : ... :... -..;:. - ':t...z;- iT. ~ .. ---=- c : ". . ",,¡T.;-'LO *,~ /1=1- · · r- ; - : - ,LJ. 1 ì""C'-..= ª~~ ~ · 9 =I'ï==.,: ¥~~::=+ ==I~~~:I:=. ::':.... _ _ : ;~~~ ~ : C~: ~ -\:.'::-:I:;::F4'.,:= n/= ~ ~~~~:\I . : =. - ~ ~ - 9 I-::-( ..D.." DO \l '\. '\. : ! · "'-:- ~~'-;-- ~ .: r=- I ~ .: î. - ¡¡¡ . '-- r-=-- I--- ..... = : = : . = ~ ~~ ~ ¡ 'Ji'$~' i ~ : ~ :\-~~~~I'I"~ ~ '\'"~,, j~~ rj!E'i}j!??i-+ r"" --~~;¡;,~: i ~'" '\:\" ~:~ · - -I· "ï;"riii~" ~(.': "I" -G-~ì~ïkW::':: :±~:: ~ ~ :~~ ttL-:--'~: : ¡ tj 8.'1' .= ~ ~I: ~-~ l ~ ~ r\. ,,\'\ I ~\~ 0-i jj-:- i~~;;: .,.. ~ "CHO!<LO"" . '- K r\. "'~ '\ : - I·i"!· - ~ ~7 ~ 7~ ¡ = I· -I- -I' . . - ·I·i. : : : : ; · K ~ . _ . "DC( I.::... - f---. e-=--,--- ~ . I ~ _ . þ:._ r_ .. J _I ., , -~~ ç ¡ --{!'Ie> ~ ,=; w _ ;,'/~,l= ~ I ~ l"\ \ .~:¡ I, f---~~:~ I~' ±:w~ I", "=-1· - ~ ~ t ,; \ : I .. :~ 1~S:JC~ -, i~ I . ~ _ .:NQM.a.Y(N , ;"t;/·¡·I_:·¡·\-\-LsL. ;. ; ',_ .LI. _' : I C'1 \ I ...... ,! '\' ~ ' , I' '\ I, I ... , J,~ 11 ¡ ! ~ i .. t:!¡ ., .. ., :¡' ~; : ; \.... \ '\~ """ '\ '\ '\ '\. ;'\.¡ '\ '\. '\ '\ "\ ". I ,;.¡: ;: j,: .',§;; ¡; ~ .~ ~ 1 1.. J II ! .- : I . ! I -- - ,- - - . . - . w . - - : ;~~ ./ - . - . , I I I \ \ I I' l/d:-~' I.' I.. .L:= ~ þ ~1£"'~~. .,.:1--<::' C.", - I' /,0' -,h~ ~ ~:r:";"I'" fi,.'.-7.. ,I ~L::::tj~r.::=t2;~c:::~ ~ '-:.~/ ~~\-~ CLL:_J~L' I =.J~L . I . . .,-j'7 f r. . ~ UTT" ".C,,'Rõ- Ii '. ~n\~ I r~:'~'~~ ~¡¡Jí~ " I ttl='='=!_~LL~LJ ~'T~''7JIJ ;~' 'i~-.--!_:_.!Z!__~!---=-J;!--2-J~ ~~U__ ., ;: . : , - _ UTTU: IIANCII '0 ì '? 7 Ow '\ , ; . ~ : ¡ . ; . ~~ , .., ,_",r ~ -- '6 ;;. ~ \~"C.:C:; Þ . '=0 , ~ " r:'-r" <::> w .~ - . t - """,no_ CRtt~ '0 j . ; . - i , = : I ; 3 = I I I I - I i - ., - ". ¡: p.: ,,';¡ . - r :: - - - : I I 1--1' - Bt . 1 ~~ ¡. t \ . j. ;'"~~ ¡ :I_~<:! ~ ·-1 I ,,~~ ¡::.r:.~~ : I·' _ I, I ;. .; - ., ,; Page: 11.4..,).. ï~~'4~[)" ~ '~:\' ,~ )0'" -- TR,IC ~ ". - ." -;¡;- -- ,'\s?-. 'í20S \ \.~G \j\V \1>,0\0 [..... .¡.:c.:.:.=p~~a''';' \' ,,",\\\\r- -R-2-1ó '0 \ 1- ~ ~L;~ ~. '- - j ".~, , 'I! 10 ~ 'I! '"I ~ ~ >-J~~~\)c~~ ' " : _~_ - R -1- 5 -'-j I,;;; ~ ~\"'L(VIEWTR, ~ 1896 I R-2-1400 I Z 1 ' ,. ';/~ X 1 '"" ~'I! :"1 1-....1- 16 0- I ~ Z I 1 1 ~, 1'11]0:'1 ']1 i ~ ' ~~ ~ I \ 1 \ ' I . \, . 1 \. ~ 10 11 " \J ,. I~~) I, I \, -;- = -: î ,,,,,,1,,,,1..1 "I" 1,0>, " " " "I ~1ftL" i" ~- =':E ~ .' G · ~'"'T"':' ': I" "r~O:~\'.. ~Tjj,.~ 'F--1- ' · , · ":ï:",:'I~:~, I); :-::= ~ __< - :-r 30 29 ,. " ,. \ ;:,L~" In I" ,. " \ ,8!,:' Lj,· ,. \.. ,. " ,. " ~'" "~~ I-~ 10"'010 WAY 10 1111 17 g ~ _ . ^-- SOUTH.....rrON 01. , II :: ~ .~l/;:~. 11 "1'J ,.'\ I~ \ " \ \I \ ,. ¡" ,0'1"\,, " ,;.:'$ ~. ,I· · ." ,," ~:',," .. " ,," 4J 42 41 40 .)9 Ja 11 .16 \.1) }4 JJ 11 I" \.so 2~ 21 ~ 1 40 .)2 111 ; --:-- J' ¡ " I ..' " .1 ,~~~,~^:~L:.. ~L; ..' 'I. ".u".." ~ j " ADOPTED: March 22, 1993 CURRENT THROUGH: , " I Ii, IGHTO~E R-7 -M F ~ "~ .,'.~' , ~'\'1"" .......... -/. OIffIELO CII. -:~. . - ü u :l).~""g---:;- \'.'- - -I-I- - ~--!!- !I.~~:~ ~ u .J 11 1. ~ ---:;- ~ HtSWIC~ 01. Q---;õ" I\">!'\'" - '- ,\- 11 u I' It~ ~ 11 I. 'II) U " u -- .-!!- --2.:- .. c- ~ ~ .. ~ - .. - .-2- ..; .. - I"XH^Þ04 01. - , 'I':'I~~.' . . -~~ 116 .-- 11 U I,j"l,) u" '0 ASTON 01. I . '0 " I' I) I." ~~\" :: ~ 11 :-:: I " !._ 0 -!.- I. In' " I ~ I n -1 , .. .- .. v_ Q~ '""~ ::: II _ It o 432 pag 0: 86 ) ........ .... ..... ..... ." \ , \ " I"" fW,jA~ IR JAjA fR. JA4 AG fR. JAJ ç - . -- .. .'~ -- " - 76 - " - ,. -- " - 17 -, 2' - ,. -- .. .. ...- 0 >- - 11 0 - < ,. x - " - .. - " - 12 - " - , -.. ,. "",:~"':"\:l~ " 'l'\" '"~ 1-;: ,. ~¿ \ o:\C~.1f1~(::, ~ 11 :"R 1-3~: :1 \5 b Ol ~ 71 16_ ~~ ~ð---\~ ~ _~.~ \~~ .. s,\l'þ 11 " " ~\ ~ II '\\)~ ~ --;;- ---;;- IJ j \ IJ~{C~ -;;-~" \ 10';- ,.--- '~ ~\ ",,-: \- "- ~ _83:" ~ ~ --;- :: 10 -:J~ ,;.r:: : " ~ ð --;- J'!-\ \ !' /. ,.- :lIS 9 9 11 .---'- ,,\--;- ~ 8 a 1':- 7 ,':', ,J.'. ~ \ .... I ':?, ~t ± '5 '--' "'!SA 01. ". " '\0J/~I, 1 \-;¡ ¡! '9 tc wEC^,'" IN. - . " - , - .\ I \ -~ ( If. 4,1.1 \ ~ R- 1 - S ¡ '" 1361 " <.> .. "" .. ¡¡" I .f¡jb¡¡fZ I 'I! :1 - -, IR. JOI 1H JCI 3C 11(. JC2 U:.JO \ 1- lit. Jd . I- 3 I- AG IW , ,: 2 - 1 l- J 1 · , . 1 . . ,. " " " 21 ,. " 1. 11 .. " .. IJ \ ,. \J. " ....EWCASTLE Pl. ~~ .. J ...~...\~... ,\ ..~. .I.~..I.. .~.. £:":-:.,.... ... .. " 11 I. oj JO ,. " .29 .., ..... ,.. .... .... '" .}Cj It '''',4.\ R¡-2 1 25 , <0 .., .. II ~ .¡ .,. \~ "" \~ ~\-H I ~ , I ]11 I I i J I IlL lit. Ordinance No. 201", October 10, 1994 ZONING MAP Grid: 78-43ó Page: 65 i IE I '" = 400' 1-~ð n 'G~ -.J9Öq , Hn ,".,.,.. ,/ ~ D UVJ 6~ J:i . ,,,,.. ::::rJ ::: : D~=~(\;5'~= nv:) a~~~~ =........ñ't'3== a i O;;O! : _ =it , :¡j..¡ nO; ; ~ \ !- .. ..,,, . ~ ~ U ..;;:< '" ..",...: '" (I o .. '''''''' ."".. '"'' -::Jtf i¡-Z . 0 > o ~i ~. "....'.:. i Q ~ ~ ~ 2' ~ ~c ~ ~ iii .. .".. 1tC ~ ~ ~ 6····'1 (' .. ...., : I ~ 0.... "....." <P= J ===~ =.l== ~=IH~c::mlm\1n~~[:::J r- D... ~....... U .. ......:=t n v :) D . ~ Q JU M 0 J ~ V oJ ~ Ð ø:t g % B B 0 ~ [ n ......,..." 0 B ~ ~ 1:" ."..."... ; ~ g N .. ."". ,...., ~"....,d \ ß L, " ...' ~ ".....,~: ~ ,,;¡;. » C [] C '. ,.." ,."... ,_ 0 r:73H~S ...... .........\~ f~ ...~...... ¡ i..··-"~ \ ...~~~~.:. D n 0 Ie,.... .... J' U Q ..", g 0> ..,- n 110\1'"'' '" ~ ,? U U ~ ~ [] VJ.. .....~". . n " ",_"" . C D r-'.~~'~ "" , z n ,. " "";: J m Z: --.. \. ,,..., -l ..........' n ... . ~" ".. ",,? "0 'A '0 "... 0 c:;IC U [ ~ ~. ~ c:;I c:;I c:;I t::1 c:;I ~ IDND t::I C t::I C CI CI c:::J C I:J ~ c:J c:::J ~ c:J ~ c:J E:I mama C a 0 t c E:I ~ a E:I E:I c:J a fF a t:I t:I t:I mmøCI' ~ n l J U ··....n.. n l:) ~ ~ .OH S3N~V1S "' [] ;- ·~n l:) žQ n 5 g :; '''''a D ?' ~ .0 ,,,,,..,,.., - 6 f;J . " "" 1-; § :« § "".. g .;:.~:~,¡." """." ~ D - ... .." he" i j [];; .n yO",...« ~ 8 ] '-~ £] .... ~ ,n 00.·'''' Un :. 1 .. '.. U ~,'~'U~.' , ... yO..,.... [] ~ ~ i n \ .. ...n.. 0 .m n :J c::::J &::I c::::J &::I &::I &::Ie CJ c::J &::I t::I c::J I:!JoImDEI C CJ~ ~ cp ~ &::I C t::I C CtD mcm a:zr {1 . A . G ~ ^ H.1 D V N H 0 ( , n l ~ û 00 ß ,. '''' ..... v.. .- J D '¡ ~ ~{1 ~ :~ n l J f ; 0 ; ..J ....". "''" 0 ' ".....00 " ('1 ~ ~ J] 0 :1 Un. ~ ~ ,0 8g .- t--~L~- v g C) '.. 0"",". ........ 0 '" ~~CJ '..;, ;: 0 " ~ ~nVJ ~~ CI' . . r· ). '... .¡,~anll(,"~\ U '-I d II. ".If)... ~ ~~ ~ ," I' "0 "o,..~, '1~ ClIOU,"IIt<) '\"j U ".....II I V .J.. V, I\'\ IQ IllInY~I'4'f1 .--:---_ '.'. U~d -'IJ n....,u .. -..I .a.'IIoQ.oo.~\ l ~..<::-- 'P"~ ..~I:!Þ .....~"'I ", .' '011\ I .v l .+n . ,.' ',<11 1100111011'0' ø... 'I) H....vJ "'''''100"..... " ." .', ll.~~ 0"" 'I'~'" '1(.1 (H)U...I\!) " ...",.. , o C, '.Uit<:)"'I"" - ".~; 6 (ì '0."" 7.[. ~ "........)'2 .. "" - 'I, """I¡Hn < « o . - ,'I.....tl . -~.. ......, ," / ~ .., "I~~ , . ~ ~ 'I~ 111"')- . ;; . " c - ..~ 111111\.110 \OJ..... -IIU'UI I""" '", hi...) t...... CI'Q,ftU, 1101 "U<I""'t.,,)~ ... ..,,,',,,10)"(1 c ;J; c C ;;0 C " m VI z· O( <c o ;;0 , ,APPLICATION FOR A ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE Please print all responses PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF ",PPUC"'NT "'GENT: HSM Development, Inc. - Don Plunk, President STi'IE:T .>.OORESS OF ",PPUCJ.NT: 1100 Providence Towers West - 5001 Spring Valley Road TEL£P/'IONE NUMBER OF Al'PUCANT: 214/419-4054 OT ~ I ST", T;: I ZIP OF ",pPUCAHT: Dallas, Texas 75244 PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION "''''ME OF PAOPE;;T Y OWNER: Billy and Ernestine Graham STRE:, .>.OORESS 0;: PAOPE.=ITY OWNER: 5020 Mark IV Parkway OTYIST",TEIZlPOFPAOPE.RrYO-Ei'I: ç_ Fort Worth, Texas 76106 I TELEPHONE NUMBER OF ;>RCPE;:¡TY OWNER, 817/626-4435 . 1£..",1. CESCRIPTlON OF PAOPEifTY WHER£ ZONING ClSTFVÇ..cHANGE IS BEING REOUESTED: 85.0 Acre Tr:ct - W. Mann Survey, Abst. 1010 :.. ;::¡E:, .>.OOAESS '" T I.OC'" TlON WHlERE ZONING Cl/srRJC: O-<"'NGE IS BEING REDUE!>TEO' No Address - PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST OTY OF NC:>ATH RI01U.NO "'LLS 1 T:Ð1 H,e. LOOP = NORTH ~ "'u.s. TEXAS 7e1W S17·5ð1.~IS a.AAENT ZONING: Agriculture I PROPOSEDZOHING: I PROPOSED USE OF PRfJI'C..ifT~: Plan -Development Single-Family Residential /iI;..50N FOR CH"'NGE: Provide for the construction of single-family housing units. CXJ YES ONO I'" TT ",CH AFFIeµ. lIlT F_I'FIOPEI'IT~ OWNER IF ",pPlJCJ.NT IS NOT ~ ~YS C]NO su~r OA MAP.. IT ",CHEO ",S REOUIIiEO BY THlS FCIRAA" /.Iereoy certify rhat rhe above mformacion is correct to rne resr of my i(now/e~. o~r:: /(-/?-~ç- r; \ Your Name (printed) Df)10 ~V0)C- Signature y~ ?ART 4. OFFICE USE ONL Y .~ 1: :I:."EL:= .....:,:.F;'NG =..:~= I ;- ~X=3 ~AJO' CJ ~ES DNO I UENS P"'IO' CJ YES DNO I "'SSESSMENTS PAlO' CJ YES DNO art ==VflCit... ,..,ë,J.RlIvG 0,,",7E ZCNlNG CISTRIC; CH"'NGE "'PROII£!), DYES c:::J NO CAO, NO, SlIPO.UTIONS, - - ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE P~\o'2 (i~ ¡'::'<Sé Nl)MSE,"f FEE s:JOO. CO T,..s .acøcaDO"\ .. raI De ~ed rot cuo< n..fW"Iil ~ Þt CQlcaOr1 ,..IS r-=_w«2. c [)..04.4 ( 1·9-1) . Billy J. Graham & Ernestine Graham 5020 Mark IV Parkway Fort Worth, TX 76106 Phone 817-626-4435 Fax 817-626-2528 November 14, 1995 City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76182 Re: Rezoning of 85 Acres ç Dear Sir, -- We own approximately 85 acres of land located in the W. Mann Survey, Abstract 1010 in the city of North Richland Hills. We have been informed that HSM Development, Inc. intends to request a zoning change on this property from agricultural to a planned development single family residential. . This letter evidences our consent for HSM Development, Inc. to request the proposed zoning provided that the conditions of the planned development are as stated on Exhibit A attached hereto with regard to the property described or depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto. We request that the City Council of North Richland Hills not vote on the requested zoning at the first meeting of the City Council at which the requested zoning is considered. Rather, we request that the City Council take public input with regard to the zoning request at that meeting and then, at that meeting, table a vote on the requested zoning to a date not earlier than 30 days after the date of the first meeting. This request to table a vote of the zoning case is made to allow the sale of the subject property to be consumed before the City Council approves the ordinance containing the requested zoning. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. . . . eepartment: Subject: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Inspections 1/08/96 Council Meeting Date: Request of Robert McCauley and Steven Hester for Replat of Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Walker Branch Addition. (Located at 8851 Grapevine Highway) Agenda Number: PS 95-39 Robert McCauley and Steven Hester are the owners of two lots located in the 8800 block of Grapevine Highway. The property is the site of a golf driving range and the Mountasia golf complex. The owners have submitted a Replat of the property to adjust a portion of the common lot line between these two lots. The reason for the adjustment is to relocate a portion of a lot line and utility easement to accommodate the construction of an in-line skating rink being built north of the Mountasia game room. ç Jhe developer has addressed all engineering comments. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this Replat request at its December 19, 1995 meeting and recommended approval subjeCt to engineer's comments. RECOMMENDA TION: - - _~ is re~on:mended that the City Council approve the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning ~ommlsslon. Finance Review .ource of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget .jÆ Other '1) Q~ ~~ Oepartment Head Signature CITY r;OIlNr.If A r;TfnN fTFM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available t ~JU 1~~}Gv~ \ Cit\ . f',n.¡nce OtreCfO( Manager eGenerallnformation A. Owner B. Developer C. Engineer D. Surveyor E. Acreage F. No. of Lots G. Density H. Zoning I. Prop. Use Water and Sewer . A. Water Lines B. Sewer Lines C. Fire Coverage Streets and Thoroughfares A. Thor. Plan B. Improvements C. Extensions D. New Streets . E. Street Lights F. Access G. Sidewalks Subdivision Plat Review Fact Sheet Case Number PS 95-39 Steven Hester, Robert McCauley and Vicki Thornton same F.P. Greenshaw III, Inc., Fort Worth TX David Moak Surveyors, Bedford TX 25.522 acres 2 n/a ç .;;.. OC Outdoor Commercial Commercial and industrial development An 8-inch water line is located along Grapevine Highway. Several water lines are located in easements on the property. Two sanitary sewer line, a 10-inch line and a 21-inch line, are located within the Walkers Branch channel adjacent to this property. Other lines are located within easements on the property. Hydrants are presently located on the property. This property has frontage on Grapevine Highway, classified as a P6D Principal Arterial (110-foot right-of-way, 6-lanes, divided roadway). None. None. No new streets are proposed with this development. Any required street lights will be installed in accordance with Public Works criteria. Access to this property is from Grapevine Highway. Sidewalks are required on all lots as each lot develops. H. Screening Walls I. New Street Names Master Drainage Plan A. Flood Plain B. Improvements C. Easements None required. None. Flood Insurance Rate Maps indicate that portions of this property lie within the 1 DO-year and 500-year flood plains. None. The flood plain is contained within a designated drainage easement on the plat. Comprehensive land Use Plan A. Development B. Special Issues ç This reqüest is. consistent with the Plan which calls for commercial development in this area. .:;... None. . CITY OF N@RTH RIC~~~ND HILLS December 1, 1995 MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Kevin MilléT,-P.E. Assistant Public Works Director - SUBJECT: PS 95-39; WALKER BRANCH ADDITION; Block 2, Lots 3R & 4R; Replat . We have reviewed the subject replat received on December 1, 1995. The plat has been corrected. The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication. In addition, the surveyor's seal and signature need to be added to the plat. ~.~- KBM/smm/pwm95134 cc: Greg Dickens, P.E., Public Works Director Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning & Inspection Services . P.O. Box 820609 * North Richland Hills. Texas * 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 *817-581-5521 * FAX 817-656-7503 CITY OF N$RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Wor'Ks November 29, 1995 MEMO TO: Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning & Inspection Services FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E. Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS95-39; Wl\LKER BRANCH ADDITION; Block 2, Lot 3R & 4R; Replat We have reviewed the subject Replat resubmitted on November 16, 1995. The following items are for your consideration. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OUTSTANDING ITEMS, WE FEEL THAT THIS PLAT SHOULD NOT BE PLACED ON AGENDA FOR PLANNING AND ZONING CONSIDERATION. 1. The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication. In addition the surveyor's seal and signature need to be added to the plat. 2. There seems to be a discrepancy in a dimension from the previous plat to the replat. These will need to be corrected with the next submittal. 3. As noted on the previous plat submittal, the bearing and dimensions need to be shown for all drainage and utility easements. 4. Inspection fees will be due prior to starting construction. The current rate is four percent for water and sewer and three percent for streets and drainage. 5. Current EPA regulations require that an NPDES permit be obtained prior to beginning construction. The owner and contractor are both responsible for obtaining the permit. The Owner should therefor request information from the EPA to determine the necessary steps for filing an application for an EPA- NPDES Permit. P.O. Box 820609 .. North Richland Hills, Texas.. 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 "817-581-5521.. FAX 817-656-7503 . . . There are a few comments recorded on the plat which has been returned to the surveyor for revision. The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. ~J,{ ~ Jr.--:{k:ú" £ Ju a W. Skare, P.E./ Staff Engineer JS\pwm95127 cc: Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director ç - CITY OF N*RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works October 25, 1995 MEMO TO: Barry LeBaron Director of Planning & Inspection Services FROM: Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: PS95-39; WALKER BRANCH ADDITION; Block 2, Lot 3R & 4R; Replat We have reviewed the suBJect Pla~ submitted on OG~ober 24, 1995. The following items are for your consideration. Q.UE TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OUTSTANDING ITEMS, WE FEEL. THAT THIS PLAT SHOULD NOT BE PLACED ON AGENDA FOR PLANNING & ZONING CONSIDERATION. 1. The address and telephone number for the Engineer needs to be added to the Plat. 2. The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication. In addition the surveyor's seal and signature need to be added to the plat. 3. The title block needs to be revised as shown for a Replat not an Amended Plat. 4. The attached easement dedication needs to be incorporated into the closing paragraph after the metes and bounds description. 5. The current zoning needs to be clearly indic.-:ted on the face of the plat. This includes the proposed lots and the adjacent lots. 6. There appears to be a discrepancy in a dim:3nsion from the previous plat to the replat. These will need to be corrected with the next submittal. 7. Inspection fees will be due prior to starting construction. The current rate is four percent for water and sewer and three percent for streets and drainage. 8. Current EPA regulations require that an NPDES permit be obtained prior to beginning construction. The owner and contractor are both responsible for obtaining the permit. The Owner should therefor request information from the EPA to determine the necessary steps for filing an application for an EPA- NPDES Permit. P.O. Box 820609 . North Richland Hiils. Texas· 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820·817-581-5521 . FAX 817-656-7503 .. - . . . There are a few comments recorded on the plat which has been returned to the surveyor for revision. The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. ::z::::. ~ Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director KBM\pwm95113 ç cc: Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Pûblic Works Director PZ Minutes - Page 7 December 19,1995 6. PS 95-38 7. PS 95-39 8. PS 95-44 Mr. LeBaron stated 60-feet of right-of-way and 41-feet of pavement. Mr. Plunk stated his major concern is a visible straight shot between Hightower and Chapman. Mr. Davis stated they could split the street in widths of rights-of-way from north to south. Mr. Baxter stated a more curved street would be a better solution. Mr. Plunk stated there will be lots fronting on this through street. He stated the lots in the south end may need to be 7,000 square feet to accommodate cul-de-sacs to keep lots from fronting a collector street. Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PZ 95-26 subject to the following requirements: a collector-type street with 60-feet of right-of-way be provided through the development with a curvilinear design; more cul-de-sac lots be shown in Tract II (south); the lots in Tract II be a minimum of 7,000 square feet with an average lot size of 7,700 square feet; the four access points to the hike and bike trail be shown on the preliminary plat; the front building lines be 25-ieet; the rear building lines be 15-feet on lots without alleys; the rear build' ines be 2a-feet on lots with alleys; the sicre-building lines be 6 feet on all lots; a 20% rear open space be required; and no front entry garages be al10wed on the collector street. The tion was seconded by Mr. Miller. The motion carried 6-0. ~ Request of Keller-Smithfield Road Limited fo the northeast corner of Smithfield Road a - - liminary Plat Brandonwood Estates. (Located at orth Tarrant Parkway) Mr. LeBaron stated this is a 44-acre ct of land zoned R-2 single family. He stated the developer has agreed to all comments exc or one street intersection that does not meet the criteria. Mr. Davis stated the Co ordinance for this pia sion should not enforce the provisions the Little Bear Creek corridor ce it was submitted prior to that being adopted. at the minutes reflect the Commission's concern since was not notified or development or approval of the flood plain ordinance for Little Bear Creek. is made the motion to approve PS 95-38 subject to engineers comments, with the waiver e street intersection. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck. The motion carried 5-0, with Request of Robert McCauley and Steven Hester for Replat of Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Walker Branch Addition. (Located at 8851 Grapevine Highway) Mr. Baxter made the motion to approve PS 95-39 subject to engineering comments. The motion was seconded by Ms. Spicer. The motion carried 6-0. he southwest corner of Rufe Snow Drive and N E Loop 820) Mr. LeBaron stated this is a 19 acre tract zoned C-2 Commercial and 1-2 M m Industrial. He stated the only issue involves sewer service to a small lot at the northwe orner. He stated if approved as proposed, the lot will not have sewer service. Mr. Davis asked if the developer would agree to a note on th permits on Lot 5 until all utility services have been provid CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS eepartment: Subject: Planning and Inspections 1/08/96 Council Meeting Date: GN95-150 Agenda Number: Consideration of a request to change the name of Parkman Drive to Rogers Drive. Ordinance No. 2090 This item was postponed at the December 11, 1995 meeting of the City Council. Attached is a request from Dr. Charles and Mrs. Fay Rogers that the street name Parkman Drive be changed to Rogers Drive. Parkman Drive is a dead end street located on the south side of Martin Drive, between Crane Road and Precinct Line Road. The Rogers live at 6416 Parkman Drive; their house is the only residence on the street. ç.Þ.t the December 11, 1995 meeting, Mr. William Hill approached the Council requesting that the name Parkman Drive be retained. Since the Rogers' were not in attendance, the Council tabled this request until the Rogers!-could be notified of Mr. Hill's concerns. City staff contacted the Rogers', and they have expressed their firm desire for the Council to approve the request as submitted. The Rogers' have also advised city staff that they will be out of town on January 8, 1996, and cannot be in attendance at the meeting. Six property _owners adjacent to Parkman Drive have been notified of the request. The proposed street name change does not conflict with any existing street names in the city. A public hearing is not required to consider .hiS request. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider Ordinance No. 2090. Finance Review .urce of Funds: onds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other '1-:': 1;g ~ ~ DepartmerÌ'f'Fiead Signature CITY COUN(;f{ A(;TI0N ITFM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Fln..nce O.,eclot Ordinance No. 2090 . AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, CHANGING THE NAME OF PARKMAN DRIVE TO ROGERS DRIVE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has received a request to change the name of Parkman Drive to Rogers Drive; and WHEREAS, the proposed name Rogers Drive does not conflict with any existing street names in the city; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that such street name change shall be adopted; NOW, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. ç- THAT, Parkman Drive, from its existing intersection at Martin Drive, south to its termination, is hereby renamed Rogers Drive. .- 2. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby qeclared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of thìs ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid .udgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 8th DAY OF JANUARY, 1996. Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary .PPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City MA.~IIN D ¡':2.1'-lE '. IS.' ·u.., .,. " ~ '" 1 2 <r'" I 3 I ~ 1 8 9 2'· ...,. TR 1202 1.6~ AC. I "1.. ~c~ 1 :;u (\1-< .. I TR . . 12£- 6 1 .... \ SON :9- íHO~:Sí þ. íE: PARt<@9 i .... ~TR ~A2A ,. ,. " p~ 15Ý ¡ ~ TR 12H TR 12K 2\66'6 2.1B AC 2.5 AC TR 12 5.2 AC 7 1:111.' -,. ç .- U /2. Go ~.4j~ " 1C' f"J1 M ~ t:> - c. \1 \ E.'S 6QOl-E. \J J><..-;z. D ....1 j T~ 4..,J. /s.S¥1@ T'- ().r;, 'il. I . J ~ , ~ ,/A.l.C .¡. .J ffl@. I ~ ~ 11.' i I I I , T~ <1,1,":0 ... /I./.1.1e.. . ... ~ i I' I S. I ~ @ -. ...... 1.Jt.~ TR 3A 9.962 . AC I j ~ . ~ In.' ,. TR ~¡; : I ~ . , ... ·11.1"~ ... ~¡ TR 3£ . 9.9 AC . . i r I I u.... , . '.J y I TR 3B 1 9,9 I AC I -- (:JARt< CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Subject: Quit Claim Deed to State; Resolution No. 96-01 Council Meeting Date: 1/R/96 Agenda Number: GN 96-01 In order for the City to receive its share of the cost for utility adjustment; the state needs this Quit Claim Deed. We have a joint-use agreement which defines our right to use the sewer lines. Recommendation: It is recommended the City Council pass Resolution No. 96-01. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Ot r Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance O"ectol ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM vvÁ C' Y Manager Page 1 of . . RESOLUTION NO. 96-01 WHEREAS, the City has sewer lines located within the right-of-way conveyed to the State of Texas by E-System, Inc., Pool Trust, dated October 8,1993; and WHEREAS, upon completion of the Department of Transportation Watauga Road extension project, the road will be turned over to the City of North Richland Hills for maintenance and operation; and WHEREAS, the State of Texas needs a quit claim from the City covering the area described in the deed in order for the City to receive its share of the utility adjustment funding. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The Mayor be, and is hereby authorized to execute the quitclaim deed to the State of Texas, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution, marked Exhibit "A". 2. The City retains its right to use the sewer lines through an existing joint-use agreement with the State. PASSED AND APPROVED this 8th day of January, 1996. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary . APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City . £XH,"b/-r If;/1 J' Texas Department of Transportation Fonn D-15-30 Page 1 of 3 Rev. 12/92 Watauga Road Parcel 6 6002-50-06 Quitclaim Deed THE STATE OF TEXAS } } } KJ.'I"OW ALL 1\iŒN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT That, The City of North Richland Hills of the County of Tarrant , State of Texas, hereinafter referred to as Grantors, whether one or more, for and in consideration of the sum of One and NoIlOO------------------------------------___________ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Dollars ($1.00---------------------------___) and other good and valuable consideration to Grantors in hand paid by the State of Texas, acting by and through the Texas Transportation Commission, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and for which no lien is retained, either expressed or implied, have Quitclaimed and do by these presents Bargain, Sell, Release and forever Quitclaim unto the State of Texas all of Grantors' right, title, interest, claim and demand in and to that certain tract or parcel of land, situated in the County of Tarrant , State of Texas, more particularly described as follows: . Adjusted under Utility Agreement No. Ul-3152. . Parcel No.6 - Deed to State of Texas from Trustees, Esystem, Inc., Pool Trust, dated October 8,1993, recorded in Volume 11395, Page 586, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. (See Exhibit "A") Texas Department of Transportation Form D- 15-30 Page 2 of 3 Rev. 12/92 . TO HAVE AND TO HOLD for said purposes together with all and singular the rights, privileges, and appurtenances thereto in any manner belonging unto the said State of Texas forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed on this the , 19 day of The City of North Richland Hills Bv: Title: ************************************************************************************ ACKNOWLEDGMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS, COUNTY OF } } BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public, on this day personally appeared . , known to me (or proved to me on the oath of , a credible witness,) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the foregoing instrument. and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this day of ,19_. Notary Public, State of Texas ************************************************************************************ CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS, COUNTY OF } } BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public, on this day personally appeared of , known to me to be the person and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that the same was the act of the said , a corporation, that he/she was duly authorized to perform the same by appropriate resolution of the board of directors of such corporation and that he/she executed the same as the act of such corporation for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this day of ,19_. . Notary Public, State of Texas ************************************************************************************ · Parcel 6 Watauga Road CSJ 8606-02-009 6-34-93 Exhibit A, Page 1 of 3 Being 3.322 acres of land, more or less, situated in the County of Tarrant, State of Texas, and being out of the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1055, and being a part of a tract of land conveyed by John C. Cook and North American Investment Company to Trustees, E-Systems, Inc., Poole Trust, by deed dated June 27, 1984, and recorded in Volume 7873, Page 2228, of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, which 3.322 acres of land, more or less, is more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a right-of-way marker set at the point of intersection of the proposed North right-of-way line of Watauga Road and the West line of said E-Systems tract, said point being South 00° 54' 35" West a distance of 466.77 feet from the Northwest corner of said tract, said point also being 60.00 feet North of and at right angles to centerline 4IÞ survey station 28+53.13 of said Watauga Road; (1) THENCE South 89° 04' 59" East along said proposed North right-of-way line a distance of 254.97 feet to a right-of- wa~marker set at the beginning of a curve to the left whose center bears North 00° 55' 01" East; (2) THENCE in an Easterly direction continuing with said proposed North right-of-way line and with said curve to the left, same having a radius of 5669.58 feet and a central angle of 04° 52' 16" and a distance of 482.00 feet to a right-of-way marker set at the beginning of a curve to the right whose center bears South 03° 57' IS" East; (3) THENCE continuing in an Easterly direction with said proposed North right-of-way line and with said curve to the right, same having a radius of 5789.58 feet and a central angle of 02° 32' 53" and a distance of 257.47 feet to a right-of-way marker set; (4) THENCE North 77° 39' 28" East continuing with said proposed North right-of-way line a distance of 51.55 feet to a right- of-way marker set; 4IÞ (5) THENCE North 88° 35' 38" East continuing with said proposed North right-of-way line a distance of 117.01 feet to a right-of-way marker set in the East line of said E-Systems tract, same also being the West right-of-way line of Cardinal Lane; . Parcel 6 Watauga Road CSJ 8606-02-009 6-4-93 Exhibit A, Page 2 of 3 (6) THENCE South 00° 46' 09" East with the said East line of E- Systems tract, same being the West right-of-way line of said Cardinal Lane a distance of 140.00 feet to a right-of-way marker set in the proposed South right-of-way line of said Watauga Road; (7) THENCE South 88° 35' 38" West with said proposed South right-of-way line a distance of 116.68 feet to a right-of- way marker set; (8) THENCE North 79° 43' 11" West continuing with the said proposed South right-of-way line a distance of 50.43 feet to a right-of-way marker set; . (9) THENCE .South 87° 50' 38" West continuing with said proposed South right-of-way line a distance of 148.43 feet to a right-of-way marker set; (10) THENCE South 86° 50' 38" West continuing with said proposed South right-of-way line a distance of 49.48 feet to a right- of-way marker set; (11) THENCE South 86° 19' 12" West continuing with the proposed South right-of-way line a distance of 54.23 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right whose center bears North 03° 57' 15" West; (12) THENCE in a Westerly direction continuing with the said proposed South right-of-way line and with said curve to the right, same having a radius of 5789.58 feet and a central angle of 04° 27' 07" and a distance of 449.86 feet to a right-of-way marker set; (13) THENCE South 79° 32' 01" West continuing with said proposed South right-of-way line a distance of 51.45 feet to a right- of-way marker set; (14) THENCE North 89° 04' 59" West continuing with said proposed South right-of-way line a distance of 125.00 feet to a right-of-way marker set; . (15) THENCE North 77° 46' 23" West continuing with said proposed South right-of-way line a distance of 25.50 feet to a right- of-way marker set; · Parcel 6 Watauga Road CSJ 8606-02-009 6-4-93 Exhibit A, Page 3 of 3 (16) THENCE North 89° 04' 59" West continuing with said proposed South right-of-way line a distance of 96.89 feet to a right- of-way marker set in the West line of the said E-Systems tract. (17) THENCE North 01° 161 48" East with the West line of said E- Systems tract, a distance of 4.71 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found; (18) THENCE North 00° 541 35" East, continuing with said West line a distance of 120.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. · · CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Legal Subject: Clarifying Power of Certain Boards; Ordinance 2092 Council Meeting Date: 1/8/9€) Agenda Number: GN 96-02 We have researched the Ordinances creating the seven boards named in this Ordinance. These are non-statutory boards and are advisory to the Council. This Ordinance does away with any confusion that might exist in this area. It makes a difference in that the strict rules of the Open Meetings and Open Records Acts do not apply to these boards. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council pass Ordinance 2092. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number BondS~(GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Bu ~ Other / ~4L J Department Head Signature I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finane» OIr.c1<H' Page 1 of . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2092 AN ORDINANCE CLARIFYING POWERS OF CERTAIN CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, that: 1. This ordinance shall pertain to the following boards and commissions of the City, which are advisory bodies to the City Council: Animal Control Shelter Advisory Committee, Beautification Commission, Cable Television, Library Board, Park and Recreation Board, Teen Court Advisory Board, and Town Hall Committee. 2. The City Council hereby clarifies its intent in creating said boards and commissions and states herein that said boards and commissions are not intended to have judicial powers or quasi judicial powers nor rule making powers other than in an advisory capacity to the City Council. PASSED and APPROVED this 8th day of January, 1996. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City ,. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 1 /8/96 G N 96-03 Subject: Accept Budget & Set Budget Hearing for crime Control & Agenda Number: Prevention District On January 3, 1996, the Temporary Crime Control District Board held a public hearing on the 2-year strategic plan and budget for the proposed Crime Control and Prevention District. The Board adopted the plan and budget and have subm itted it for Council review and consideration. The Temporary Board also called for an election to create the Crime Control District and authorize one-half '" .' cent sales tax. Such an electionrs to be held Tuesday, February 20, 1996. ~ In accordance with the State law authorizing crime control districts, after the Temporary Board holds a public hearing and adopts it, then it is necessary for the City Council to hold a second public hearing and adopt the budget. This public hearing by the City Council is required to have a publication in the newspaper in the same manner as is done in .adopting the annual budget for the city. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council set the public hearing for the Crime Control District 2-year Plan and Budget for Monday, January 22, 1996 at 7:30 p.m., and to authorize the necessary publication of the notice of hearing. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director ity Manager Page 1 of e TWO YEAR PLAN SUMMARY THE NORTH RICH LAND HILLS CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT PRESENTS AN ANTI-CRIME PACKAGE WHICH WILL: 1. PROVIDE EXCEPTIONAL POLICE SERVICE TO THE CITIZENS OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WITHOUT AN INCREASE IN AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES BY A. REDUCING RESPONSE TIME ON POLICE CALLS; B. INCREASE OFFICER VISIBILITY IN CITY NEIGHBOR- ": HOODS AND PARKS, C. ENHA~CE CRIME FIGHTING ABILITY WITH NEW AND UPDATED TECHNOLOGY AND D. STEM JUVENILE AND GANG RELATED CRIMINAL ACTIVITI ES. e THIS WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY PROVIDING 1. UPDATED POLICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAMS, 2. COMMUNITY RELATED CRIME PREVENTION STRATEGIES, AND 3. SPECIFIC TREATMENT AND/OR PREVENTION PROGRAMS. THE ANTI-CRIME PACKAGE PRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT WILL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION AND AUGMENTATION OF STATUTORY ITEMS WHICH PERTAIN TO CITY - WIDE DISTRICTS THAT ARE LISTED IN ARTICLE 5 OF THE STATUTE AUTHORIZING ANTI-CRIME DISTRICTS (ARTICLE 2370c-1, REVISED CIVIL STATUTES). EACH OF SUCH STRATEGIES LISTED IN THE STATUTE WILL BE SUPPORTED BY THIS DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT WILL DEVELOP A METHOD OF ANNUALLY EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OF CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION STRATEGIES. e THE DISTRICT WILL FOLLOW AND COMPLY WITH THE BUDGETING REQUIREMENT OF ARTICLE 2370c-1, WHICH AUTHORIZES THIS DISTRICT AS A MEANS OF CRIME FIGHTING IN ORDER TO AVOID OVERTAXING OF PROPERTY OWNERS THROUGH AD VALOREM TAX. THIS DISTRICT WILL HAVE NO POWER TO IMPOSE AD VALOREM TAXES. , . e THE DETAILS OF THE DISTRICT PLAN CAN BE EXAMINED IN A PUBLIC DOCUMENT WHICH FOLLOWS THIS STATEMENT AND IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AT 7301 N.E. LOOP 820, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. ANTI-CRIME HALF CENT SALES TAX YEAR 1 Income $ 3,500,000 Expenses<:: Police & Law Enforcement - $ 2,136,496 $ 266,492 $ 23,813 $ 2,426,801 .- Community Related Crime Specific Prevention Program e Retained at Year End (Transition Funding) $ 1,073,199 ANTI- CRIME HALF CENT SALES TAX YEAR 2 Retained Earnings Earnings (Collections) Expenses: Police & Law Enforcement $ 1,073,199 $ 3,500,000 Community Related Crime Prevention $ 1,907,121 $ 381 ,125 Specific Prevention Program Total Expense $ 79,795 $ 2,368,041 e Retained at end of Year 2 (Transition Funding) $ 2,205,158 YEAR ONE BUDGET e POLICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED PROGRAMS COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE REPLACEMENT $ 500,000.00 COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT PACKAGE $ 170,143.00 PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS UPGRADE $ 186,089.00 OPERATIONS BUREAU UPGRADE $ 799,579.00 COMMUNICATIONS SECTION UPGRADE $ 125,000.00 ~.:. SUPPORT EQUIPMENT FUNDING $ 48,600.00 REPORT WRITING AND SUBMISSION UPGRADE $ 130,000.00 VEHICLE IMPOUNDMENT UPGRADE PROPERTY e MANAGEMENT TECHNICIAN $ 36,421.00 DETENTION SERVICES UPGRADE $ 140,664.00 RELATED PROGRAM TOTAL $2,136,496.00 e e YEAR ONE BUDGET COMMUNITY-RELATED CRIME PREVENTION STRATEGIES CITY HALL AT THE MALL AND PUBLIC SERVICE OFFICER PACKAGE $ 165,854.00 COMMUNITY SERVICES UPGRADE $ 100,638.00 Related Program Total $ 266,492.00 <.';' ~ e - 2 e YEAR ONE BUDGET SPECIFIC TREATMENT AND PREVENTION PROGRAMS COMMUNITY SERVICES UPGRADE $ 23,813.00 GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PROGRAMS $2,426,801.00 <:.~.. - e e 3 e e - YEAR ONE BUDGET POLICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED PROGRAMS COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE REPLACEMENT . YEAR ONE FUNDING Hardware Upgrade or Replacement Software Replacement YEAR ONE TOTAL COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT PACKAGE . YEAR ONE FUNDING Salary Adjustment of Current Personnel YEAR ONE TOTAL .;,.. PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS UPGRADE . YEAR ONE FUNDING Captain for Administrative Services Division 1 Professional Standards Officer Officer Equipment 1 CrimelManagement Analyst (Civilian) 1 Professional Standards Public Safety Technician Clerical Equipment YEAR ONE TOTAL OPERATIONS BUREAU UPGRADE . YEAR ONE FUNDING 4 Patrol Lieutenants (Station Commanders) 5 Uniformed Services Division Patrol Officers Officer Equipment (9 Officers) 6 Marked Patrol Vehicles 3 Unmarked Vehicles for CID (Fleet Replacements) YEAR ONE TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS SECTION UPGRADE . YEAR ONE FUNDING 3 Motorola Consoles 2 Consolette radios for off site dispatch center 4 Telephones for off site dispatch center 2 Computers, printers, network cards and off site hook up Desks, chairs, weather monitors, headsets, maps YEAR ONE TOTAL $ 150,000.00 350,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 170,143.00 $ 170,143.00 $ 63,070.00 $ 38,227.00 10,800.00 40,668.00 29,324.00 4,000.00 $ 186,089.00 $ 226,844.00 $ 191,135.00 48,600.00 285,000.00 48.000.00 $ 799,579.00 $ 96,000.00 10,000.00 2,000.00 8,000.00 9.000.00 $ 125,000.00 e e e SUPPORT EQUIPMENT FUNDING * YEAR ONE FUNDING Crimina/Investigation Division - 9 Portable Data Terminals YEAR ONE TOTAL S 48,600.00 $ 48,600.00 REPORT WRITING AND SUBMISSION UPGRADE * YEAR ONE FUNDING Operations Bureau - 65 Lap Top Computers: YEAR ONE TOTAL $ 130,000.00 $ 130,000.00 VEHICLE IMPOUNDMENT UPGRADE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TECHNICIAN * YEAR ONE FUNDING 1 Civilian Property and Evidence Technician Equipment for TeCflnician YEAR ONE TOTAL $ 32,421.00 4,000.00 $ 36,421.00 .;,... DETENTION SERVICES UPGRADE o YEAR ONE FUNDING 4 Civilian Detention Officer Equipment for Detention Officer YEAR ONE TOTAL $ 137,664.00 3,000.00 $ 140,664.00 e e e YEAR ONE BUDGET COMMUNITY-RELATED CRIME PREVENTION STRATEGIES CITY HALL AT THE MALL AND PUBLIC SERVICE OFFICER PACKAGE o YEAR ONE FUNDING 5 Public Service Officers Equipment for 5 Public Service Officers YEAR ONE TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES UPGRADE * YEAR ONE FUNDING 1/2 School Resource Officer 1/2 Officer Assignè~ Equipment 1/2 Clerical Equipment, 1 D.A.R.E. Public Safety Technician 1 School Resource Marked Vehicle YEAR ONE TOTAL $ 162,104.00 3.750.00 $ 165,854.00 $ 19,114.00 2,700.00 2,000.00 29,324.00 47.500.00 $ 100,638.00 YEAR ONE BUDGET e SPECIFIC TREATMENT AND PREVENTION PROGRAM COMMUNITY SERVICES UPGRADE (I} YEAR ONE FUNDING 1/2 Schoof Resource Officer 1/2 Officer Assigned Equipment 1/2 Clerical Equipment YEAR ONE TOTAL $ 19,113.00 2,700.00 2,000.00 $ 23,813.00 ~...~ ..:.- e e e , YEAR TWO BUDGET POLICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED PROGRAMS COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFìWARE REPLACEMENT $ 60,000.00 COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT PACKAGE $ 251,772.00 PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS UPGRADE $ 171,289.00 OPERATIONS BUREAU UPGRADE $1 169,060.00 COMMUNICATIONS SECTION UPGRADE $ 0.00 -:.:" SUPPORT EQUIPMENT FUNDING $ 23,000.00 REPORT WRITING AND SUBMISSION UPGRADE $ 50,000.00 VEHICLE IMPOUNDMENT,UPGRADE 'PROPERTY e MANAGEMENT TECHNICIAN $ 32A21.00 DETENTION SERVICES UPGRADE $ 149,579.00 Related Program Total $1,907,121.00 e YEAR TWO BUDGET e COMMUNITY-RELATED CRIME PREVENTION STRATEGIES CITY HALL AT THE MALL AND PUBLIC SERVICE OFFICER PACKAGE $ 273,617.00 COMMUNITY SERVICES UPGRADE $ 107,508.00 RELATED PROGRAM TOTAL $ 381,125.00 <.: .;,... e e 2 YEAR TWO BUDGET SPECIFIC TREATMENT AND PREVENTION PROGRAMS e OPERATIONS BUREAU UPGRADE Grand Total of All Programs <.:" - e e $79,795.00 $2,368,041.00 3 e e e YEAR TWO BUDGET POLICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED PROGRAMS COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE REPLACEMENT . YEAR TWO FUNDING Computer Maintenance on Above Items YEAR TWO TOTAL $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT PACKAGE . YEAR TWO FUNDING Salary Adjustment of Current Personnel YEAR TWO TOTf\L PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS QpGRADE $ 251,772.00 $ 251,772.00 . YEAR TWO FUNDING Continuation of Personnel CostsJrom Year One YEAR TWO TOTAL $ 171,289.00 $ 171,289.00 OPERATIONS BUREAU UPGRADE . YEAR TWO FUNDING 5 Uniformed Services Division Patrol Officers Continuation of Personnel Costs from Year One 10 Marked Patrol Vehicles Officer Equipment (11 Officers) Unmarked Street Crimes Unit Vehicles ...... The following positions are all 114 year funding 3 Uniformed Services Division Patrol Officers 2 Criminal Investigators YEAR TWO TOTAL $ 191,135.00 370,142.00 475,000.00 53,000.00 32,000.00 28,670.00 19,113.00 $1 J 169,060.00 COMMUNICATIONS SECTION UPGRADE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT FUNDING . YEAR TWO FUNDING Police Facilities Improvement $ 20,000.00 Uniformed Services Division Traffic Section - 1 Traffic Computer. $ 3,000.00 YEAR TWO TOTAL $ 23,000.00 REPORT WRITING AND SUBMISSION UPGRADE e I) YEAR TWO FUNDING Operations Bureau - 25 Lap Top Computers YEAR TVVO TOTAL $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 VEHICLE IMPOUNDMENT UPGRADE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TECHNICIAN I) YEAR TWO FUNDING Continuation of Personnel Costs from Year One YEAR TVVO TOTAL $ 32.421.00 $ 32,421.00 DETENTION SERVICES UPGRADE I) YEAR TWO FUNDING 1 Civilian Detentrol1 Supervisor (114 Year Position) Equipment for Detention Officer Continuation of Personnel.:eosts from Year One YEAR TVVO TOTAL $ 11,165.00 750.00 137.664.00 $ 149,579.00 e e YEAR TWO BUDGET e COMMUNITY-RELATED CRIME PREVENTION STRATEGIES CITY HALL AT THE MALL AND PUBLIC SERVICE OFFICER PACKAGE ] YEAR TWO FUNDING 3 Public Service Officers Continuation of Personnel Costs from Year One Equipment for 3 Public Service Officers Equipment for "City Hall at the Mall" YEAR TWO TOTAL $ 97,263.00 162,104.00 2, 250.00 12.000.00 $ 273,617.00 COMMUNITY SERVICES UPGRADE <.:" o YEAR TWO FUNDING 1 D.A.R.E. Officer (Quarter Year Funding) 1 0 ARE Marked Vehicle Continuation of Personnel Costs from Year One Officer Assigned Equipment YEAR TWO TOTAL .;,... e $ 9,557.00 25,000.00 67,551.00 5.400.00 $ 107,508.00 e e e . YEAR TWO BUDGET SPECIFIC TREATMENT AND PREVENTION PROGRAMS . YEAR TWO FUNDING Continuation of Personnel Costs from Year One Officer Equipment (11 Officers) Unmarked Street Crimes Unit Vehicles ~ The following positions are all 1/4 year funding 1 Investigative Services Division Street Crimes Officer YEAR TWO TOTAL <.: .;,.. 47,838.00 6,400.00 16,000.00 9,557.00 $ 79,795.00 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 01/08/96 Subject: Ordinance No. 2096 Amending Franchise Agreement With Laidlaw Waste Systems and Granting Rate Increase Agenda Number: GN 96-04 On September 29, 1995 Laidlaw Waste Systems notified the City of its request to increase garbage collection rates. They requested a 67¢ per month increase for residential rates and increases from 5.5% to 11.1 % for commercial customers. Our current Franchise Agreement indicates that rates may be adjusted by 85% of the CPI on an annual basis and any other increases may be made only if costs are caused by Federal or State mandates. While we do not doubt that costs have increased because of mandated issues related to landfill and other disposal costs, it is extremely difficult to quantify the impact of the mandated increases to Laidlaw's North Richland Hills' operation. To do an accurate analysis, the City would need to conduct an independent rate analysis. As a practical matter, the time expense, and industry specific expertise necessary to conduct this analysis effectively prohibits such an undertaking. Because of this, we have looked at an alternative method of evaluating the rates. Under this alternative, current garbage i'åtes would be divided into Operational and Disposal Componênts on a 70/30 ratio. Operations costs would be adjusted by an index equivalent to 85% of the annual percentage increase in CPI. Disposal costs would be increased by an index equivalent to the annual percent increase of the average gate rate for compacted land fill materials. This approach results in an increase of 50¢ per month for residential customers. The increase for commercial customers amounts to about 7.6%. The proposed Ordinance substitutes "take all" collection in place of the "four free landfill days" and "semi-annual two week curbside cleanup service" provided by the current contract. Ordinance No. 2096 amends the existing Franchise Ordinance in three important respects: 1. The proposed Ordinance deletes existing terms which provide for adjustments associated with mandated State and Federal cost increases. The revised rate adjustment methodology relies on an index based approach that appears to be (A.) generally reflective of total cost increases and (B.) susceptible to reasonable and independent verification. 2. Current rates are amended to reflect the rates illustrated in Attachments "A" and "B". 3. The current contract is further amended to provide "take all" collection service in lieu of the "four free landfill weekends" and "semi-annual two week curbside cleanup service" offered under the existing contract. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Ordinance No. 2096 be approved. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget _ Other _ ~ ./ ;.--~~~ ~ ~nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance OIr.Clot Page 1 of · · · ORDINANCE NO. 2096 WHEREAS, the City Council of North Richland Hills, Texas approved Ordinance No. 1745 as a Franchise Agreement with Laidlaw Waste Systems Inc. (CONTRACTOR) to provide residential, commercial, and industrial garbage (solid waste) collection and disposal, and recycling services; and WHEREAS, the City Council further amended Ordinance No. 1745 with Ordinance No. 1954 and Ordinance No. 2029; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to further amend Ordinance No. 1745 and No. 1954 and to repeal Ordinance No. 2029; and WHEREAS, Laidlaw Waste Systems has made application for adjustments to existing residential and commercial front-load solid waste collection and disposal rates. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS THAT: 1. Ordinance No. 2029 passed on December 12, 1994, which adopted existing rates for residential and commercial I industrial front-load container customers be and is hereby repealed and replaced by Ordinance 2096 when it is passed and approved. 2. The monthly solid waste charges to North Richland Hills residents and commercial I industrial front-load customers shall be increased to the rates reflected in Attachments A and 8 attached hereto and made apart hereof and adopted as part of this Ordinance. These rates shall become effective February 1, 1996. 3. This Ordinance is adopted as an amendment to Ordinance No. 1745 as previously amended by Ordinance No. 1954. The terms of this Ordinance shall govern in construing this Ordinance and Ordinance Nos. 1745 and 1954. 4. Sections and sub-sections of Ordinance 1745 and 1954 are amended as follows: SECTION 3 - Definitions This section of Ordinance No. 1745 is expanded to include the following terms: · · · P. Base Rate: The total approved solid waste collection and disposal rates for residential and commercial I industrial front-load customers, excluding sales taxes and recycling fees. Q. Operations Component: Defined as 70% of the Base Rate. This portion of the Base Rate reflects the approximate portion of the total rate attributable to collection and operational activities. R. Disposal Component: Defined as 30% of the Base Rate. This portion of the Base Rate reflects the approximate portion of the total rate attributable to disposal activities. S. Rate Modification Date: The existing Base Rate will upon a timely request of the CONTRACTOR, be reviewed and if appropriate, revised effective upon a date defined as the Rate Modification Date. The Rate Modification Date is established as February 1 st. In order for the City to consider a modification, the CONTRACTOR shall request a review of the current Base Rate by November 15th preceding the Rate Modification Date. SECTION 6. Contractor's Duties and Obligations. Subsection H. Paragraphs 1 and 2 These Subsections of Ordinance No. 1-745 (as further amended by Ordinance No. 1954) will be repealed and replaced as follows: CONTRACTOR shall provide free pickup for City facilities. CONTRACTOR shall collect all items placed on the curb as part of the regular waste collection cycle providing that: the items are acceptable for landfill disposal, the items are containerized in a bag, in a box, or if tied and bundled are fifty (50) Ibs. or less in weight. Brush and tree limbs must be tied in bundles not to exceed four (4) feet in length and fifty (50) Ibs. in weight. This service includes construction and fencing materials generated by the homeowner resulting from repair and remodeling projects. The City shall have free dumping privileges during the term of this agreement. Bulky items, including stoves furniture, hot water heaters, dishwashers, etc., when placed on the curb, will be picked up as part of normal collections. Federal Law prohibits the collection of refrigerator or freezer units unless certification is provided that CFC's have been removed by a certified technician. Other hazardous waste items that are not acceptable for landfill disposal include tires, batteries, petroleum products, paints and other chemicals and solvents identified by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2 · · · SECTION 7. Charges. Subsection E. Revisions This Subsection of Ordinance No. 1745 (as further amended by Ordinance No. 1954) is repealed and replaced as follows: CONTRACTOR shall maintain such residential and commercial rates as adopted in Attachments A and B until January 31, 1997. On February 1, 1997 and on each anniversary thereafter (the Rate Modification Date) the existing Base Rates may be increased by a combination of calculated increases in the Operations and Disposal Components of the Base Rate. If the CONTRACTOR desires a review of the existing rates, CONTRACTOR shall submit to City in writing, its adjustments to the Base Rate and the supporting data for the same period, on or before November 15th of each year, beginning November 15, 1996. For purposes of calculating the total rate increase. the Base Rate shall be divided into an Operations Component and a Disposal Component. The Operation Component shall equal 70% of the total Base.Rate and the Disposal Component shall equal 30% of the total Base Rate. The Operations Component will be adjusted by a factor defined as 85% of the total percent increase in the DFW Consumer Price Index (CPI). Data compiled in the Bureau of Labor Statistics Southwestern Statistical Summary will be used to calculate the CPI increase. The measured increase will span a twelve month period (beginning September 1st and ending August 31st) immediately preceding the Rate Modification Date. The Disposal Component will be adjusted by a factor defined as the average percent increase in the gate rate for compacted landfill material, as charged by a representative sample of area landfills. The landfills used to determine the increase are identified in Appendix C. The measured increase will span a twelve month period (beginning November 1st and ending October 31st) immediately proceeding the Rate Modification Date. The specific rate calculation methodology is further illustrated by a hypothetical example incorporated into this Ordinance as Attachment D. Increases in the Base Rate calculated in accordance with the terms of this Ordinance shall be granted in lieu of rate adjustments associated with specific regulatory mandates or other specific operational cost increases. Every adjustment to the CONTRACTOR charges or compensation established herein shall be cumulative and in addition to other adjustments conferred herein. 3 · PASSED AND APPROVED this 8th day of January, 1996. APPROVED: Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: · Rex McEntire - Attorney for the City · 4 · · · Attachment A Residential Garbage Rate Comparison for the City of North Richland Hills Total Backdoor Garba e Service Rec clin Sales Tax remitted to State Total Base Garbage Fee Rec clin Fee Sales Tax remitted to State Total . Backdoor Garbage Service Recycling Sales Tax remitted to State Total 01/02/96 $6.10 $1.69 $0.60 $8.39 $9.63 $1.91 $0.89 $12.43 $9.63 $0.90 $0.82 $11.35 ,õiff;r~ri¿~' ;R:~~~è:: $6.56 $0.46 7.5% $1.69 $0.00 0.0% $0.64 $0.04 5.9% $8.89 $0.50 5.9% $10.36 $0.73 7.6% $1.91 $0.00 0.0% $0.95 $0.06 6.3% $13.22 $0.79 6.3% ~¡'¡*~~¡,Ó"~~ .biffi~~i;'}ê¡~j~G:,g~J, $6.56 $0.46 7.5% $0.90 $0.00 0.0% $0.58 $0.04 6.6% $8.04 $0.50 6.6% $10.36 $0.73 7.6% $0.90 $0.00 0.0% $0.87 $0.06 6.9% $12.13 $0.79 6.9% utility\nrhllrat( c).\ . . ~ o tIJ '¡: tU Co E en O::I: U-c .s:; tU.c CJ 0::: .~ ..... a:: ai"C.c EtUt:: L: 0 0 o...Jz ttI I .... ........0 ..... ~ C:{O~ '- .- u..U _CD tU£ 'ëj ... '- 0 (I).... E E o U . '#.'#.'#.'#.'#. CD CD CD CD CD r--:r--:I'-I'-r--: -" CD CD 3: .... CD o.."f" III 0.. :J -" o ã: ~CD"f"(,)o)O CD~~~~~ 1II1'-0)"f""f"0) ~OIO"-CD"f" ~"-"-NN(,) o a: I'-I'-"f"..-"f" _CO..-I'-I'-(,) c: . , , , , CD 0) CO 0) 1O"f" ....0) "f"O)"f"N ~ ~""N('I') o '#.'#.'#.'#.'#. CD CD CD CD CD r--:r--:I'-r--:r--: -" CD CD 3: ~o)COIOOo) CD~~I'-:~~ lII"f"I'-..-COCD ~CONI'-COI'- ~ """"",...N e a... .... CD 0..(') III 0.. :J -" o ã: COI'-..-O"f" _o)"f"CDO)..- c: . . . . . CDCOCOO)"f"1'- ....1'-..-101'-10 ~ .,....,....,-N o '#.'#.'#.#'#. CD CD CD CD CD r--:r--:r--:r--:r--: -" CD CD 3: "CI'-CO(,)COCO CD~~~~~ 1II"f"0..-(,)"f" ~CDo)NIOO ~ ""',....N o a: .... CD o..N III 0.. :J -" o ã: (,)O"f"N"f" _I'-O)O)COO) c: . . . . . CDO)(')NNO) ....IOCO..-"f"CO ::; .,....,....,.... o #'#.'#.## CD CD CD CD CD r--:r--:I'-r--:r--: -" CD CD 3: ~(,)IOI'-NCD CD~~~~~ 1110 CD CD CO CD ~"f"IOI'-CO;: o a: .... CD 0....- III 0.. :J -" o ã: OIOCDCD"f" _NIO..-NO c: . . . , , CDI'-N..-NCO ....(')IOI'-COO :; ..- o ~ooooo .- >- >- >- >- >- (l)N (')"f" CD CO '#. '#. '#. # ~ 0 CD CD CD CD CD I'- I'- r--: r--: I'- "C CD..-(,)o)"f" CD ~~I'-:~~ III OCD..-N(') -" 8- _..-N(')"f" CD CD 0 3: ('( a: ø~ o..w III 0.. 0) CD 0) 0) I'- :J - O..-..-N(') -" c: . . . . , 0 CD 0 10 0_0 0 ã: t:,....,.....('IM...,- :J 0 '#. '#. ~ '#. '#. 0 CD CD CD CD CD r--: r--: I'- I'- I'- "C (')..-CDO(') 0) ..- 0 0) CO CD . . . . . III IONOO)I'- -" 1& 10(')..-1'-1'- CD ..-N(')(')"f" CD 0 3: a: .... CD 0.. CD III 0.. ..-..-1010 CD :J - 0)1'-..-00 -" c: . . . . , 0 CD"f" lOCO (')"f" ã: ,-"f"..-COIO"f" :;..-NN(')"f" 0 # # '#. '#. # CD CD ~ CD CD I'- r--: I'- r--: r--: "C CO "f"NI'-..- CD..-<OIOIO CD . . . . . III ..- (') ..- (') 10 -" g (')O)CD(')O CD ..-..-N(')"f" CD e 3: a... .... CD 0..10 III 0.. I'- 0) (') 0 10 :J - (')"f""-OCO -" c: No)MO<D ,2 CD a... '- NI'-"f"..-I'- :; ..- ..- N (') (') 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 N >- >- >- >- >- ü5 N (') "f" CD CO '<t .;x: == qj ïii >- ñi c: os Q¡ 0) ~ i;; 0) · ATTACHMENT C Designated Area Landfills Used to Determine Increase in Average Gate Rate for Compacted Landfill Material The following area landfills will be used to determine the increase in the average gate rate for compacted landfill material. This percent increase will provide the index by which the Disposal Component of the Base Rate will be modified. The increase in the average rates will be measured over a period spanning November 1 st through October 31 st. LANDFILL Farmers Branch DFW Lewisville Turkey Creek Sanfill · VMI Westside · . . . . . ATTACHMENT D - MODIFICATION METHODOLOGY GENERAL - Prior to each Rate Modification Date, CONTRACTOR may request that the existing residential and commercial I industrial rates (the Base Rates) be reviewed for modification. This process involves three basic steps: I. Separate Existina Base Rate Into Operations and Disposal Components Existing residential and commercial I residential front-load collection and disposal rates (the Base Rates) shall be separated into an Operations Component and a Disposal Component based upon a 70/30 ratio. II. Modify Operations And Disposal Components The Operations Component (70% of the Base Rate) will be adjusted to reflect increases equal to 85% of the increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), while the Disposal Component (30% of the Base Rate) will be adjusted to reflect increases in the average gate rate for compacted materials charged by specific area landfills. III. Combine Modified Operations And Disposal Components To Form New Base Rates The modified Operations and Disposal Components will then be combined to produce the new Residential and Commercial rates which will become effective on the next Rate Modification Date. CALCULATION METHODOLOGY - The calculation methodology can again, be illustrated in three steps: I. First, assuming the existing Base Rate to equal B1 then: The current Operations Component ( 01 ) equals the current Base Rate times 70% or: 01 = .781 The current Disposal Component ( D1 ) equals the current Base Rate times 30% or: D1 = .381 II. Second, the current Operations Component times 85% of the percentage change in the CPI equals the amount of the Operations Component modification. The amount of the modification plus the existing Operations Component equals the new or modified Operations Component or: 01 + [(01) (.85) (percent CPI change)] = 02; Where 01 represents the existing Operations Component and 02 equals the modified Operations Component. The current Disposal Component times the percent change in the average gate rate charged by selected area landfills, equals the amount of the Disposal Component modification. The amount of this modification plus the existing Disposal Component equals the new or modified Disposal Component or: D1 + [(D1) (percent average gate rate change)] = D2; Where D1 represents the existing Disposal Component and D2 equals the modified Disposal Component. III. Third, the new Base Rate is calculated by combining the modified Operations and Disposal Components or: B2 = 02 +D2; where B2 = the new or modified Base Rate, 02 = the new or modified Operations Component, and D2 = the new or modified Disposal Component. . . ATTACHMENT D (Cont.) EXAMPLE: Hypothetical modification of residential Base Rate Assume the following assumptions as given: 1. The existing Residential Base Rate = $10.00 per month. 2. The applicable CPI @ 09/01/9x = 100 and the applicable CPI @ 08/31/9y = 110 3. The average gate rate for compacted land fill material @ 11/01/9x = $6.00 and the same rate @ 10/31/9y = $ 6.60 . .1 1 STEP 1 Seperate Existing Base Rate Into Operations and Disposal Components Operations Calculation Disposal Calculation Current Current Base Base Rate Rate X X X 70% 70% 30% = -- = Beginning Operations Beginning Disposal - Component $7.00~ Component STEP 2 Modify Operations and Disposal ComponèÌ1ts Operations Modification _Beg. Operations Component ITimes 85% ¡Times % Inc. in CPI (See a) 1= Modification ~ Modification + Beg ~ Component = Ending ~ Component Disposal Modification $7.00 _Beg. Disposal Component 85.00% IN/A 1 0.00% ~Times % Inc. in Compacted 1 Gate Rate (See b) $0.601= Modification ~ Modification + Beg ~ Component = Ending $7.60 ~ Component X 30% = $3.00§ l I ¡ I I $3001 10.00% I $0.301 $3.30 ~ ¡STEP 3 Combine Modified Operations & Disposal Components To Form New Base Rates i Modified Operations Component $7.60 . +Modified Disposal Component = Modified Base Rate $3.30 $10.90 lia) Calculation of CPI Increase !I ¡¡Beg CPI ¡lEnding CPI 1:% Increase I b) Calculation of Gate Rate Increase !I 100 I¡Beg Avg Gate Rate $6.001 110 IIEnding Avg Gate Rate $6.60 I 10.00%1 % Increase 10.00% CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Department: Environmental Services Subject: Part-time Shelter Attendant Council Meeting Date: 1/08/95 Agenda Number: GN96-05 For the past two months, the Animal Services Center has been experiencing an on going problem with infectious agents which are causing distemper like symptoms in our dogs and upper respiratory symptoms (URI) in our cats. We have been working with both Dr, Joe Metcalf and Dr. Chris Peek of Davis Blvd. Animal Clinic and with Dr. Jed Ford of Family Pet Clinic trying to get this under control. It is currently taking approximately 10.5 man-hours daily to feed, clean and disinfect the animal holding areas. It has now been recommended that we add a specialized cleaning procedure that will add at least 2 hours per day to our shelter technician's daily schedule. We must incorporate this procedure to protect the health of incoming animals and to ensure healthy animals for adoption. We have been in touch with other shelters who are experiencing similar problems and each has found that the only way to control the infections is by having adequate shelter staff be diligent in their cleaning and observation of the animals. We must get this ~ :problem under control. While this situation continues we are able to adopt out fewer pets because of the risk of infection to that animal and to any other animals that the adopter may have at home. Animals that we impound and that are brought to the shelter are also at risk for these infections. A part-time shelter attendant is needed to facilitate the new procedures. We are currently operating with one full time shelter technician and two part-time shelter attendants. One of these part-time shelter attendants is limited to helping the shelter technician on Tuesday and Thursday mornings, because the remainder of her shift is working on Saturday and Sunday. The .second part-time shelter attendant works the front counter in the afternoon and enables us to keep the Center open to 7:00 p.m. n the evening. The hours for the requested part-time shelter attendant would be Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday from 7:00 a.m, to 11 :00 a.m. and on Tuesday from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. The position requested would have the following impact financially: Part -Time Shelter Attendant 19 hours / week @ $7,71/hour ( $7,16/hour + 7.65% FICA): $150.00/week 40 weeks @ $150.00/week: $6,000 Total for the remainder of this fiscal year: $6,000 I will be submitting this as a regular part time position for the '96/'97 budget year, but feel that we cannot wait until next October because of the current problems in the Center. It is requested that City Council authorize expenditure from council contingency fund, Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the part-time shelter attendant position. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) !!IlIA Operating Budget ,., Oth Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ê4 ~~~ , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM l Department: Parks and Recreation Department Council Meeting Date: 1-8-96 Professional Services Contract - Girls Fast Pitch Subject: Softball Complex Agenda Number: GN 96-06 The 1995/96 Parks and Recreation Facilities Development Capital Improvement Program included a design budget of $150,000 for new facilities for Girls Fast Pitch Softball. The project, located on the west side of the waterpark site, includes; four lighted softball fields, two practice fields with backstops, restroom and concession building, multi-use trail, playground, pavilion, picnic facilities, a trail connection to the North Electric Trail, and associated parking, landscape and irrigation. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Staff considered the following 5 firms for the design services to include master planning, preparation of a TPWD grant application for the January 31, 1996 deadline, and preparation of plans and specifications for the construction of the park: Newman, Jackson, Beiberstein, Inc J. T. Dunkin and Associates MESA Design Group Schrickel, Rollins, and Associates Brinkley/Sargent Architects Council directed staff to proceed with the grant application process with MESA Design Group at their December 11, 1995 meeting. Staff recommends that the City contract the professional services of MESA Design Group for the completion of design services, based on their previous experience, experience of their subconsultants, reputation of the firm, and similar project experience applicable to this project. FUNDING SOURCE: Look., ~ D í (M'fy-A ,.,t- L-\-Î~~'Ý ¡ <~.-.. ~~ rQH''''-' <..J( Account 09-92-10-6000 $143,700 RECOMMENDA TION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to contract me professIonal services of MESA Design Group for the preparation of the development plan and construction documents for the Girls Fast Pitch Softball Complex. ATTACHMENTS Letter Agreement for Professional Services Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget _ .Other -. Fin""ceDlreclor _ \ ~ ~_ '.L"\" ~ _ ]Jv\'~ -~ Department Head Signature vi . CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM Page 1 of I . , MESA . DESIGN GROUP PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: December 14. 1995 Bill Thornton Patty Moos Park and Recreation Department City of North Richland Hills 6720 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Project: Girls Fast Pitch Softball Center North Richland Hills, Texas SCOPE OF SERVICES ,. . The consultant will provide the following planning and professional services for Girls Fast Pitch Softball Center - North Richland Hills, Texas. This scope of services shall apply to Phase I. DESIGN SERVICES '..^. Data Collection/Site Reconnaissance 1. Acquire digital survey and perform on the ground field check for accuracy; tie down metes and bounds; locate significant trees. 2. Visit the site and coordinate pre-design meeting with Park Department to review scope and program. 3. Perform environmental review/analysis. 4. Begin hydrology analysis/watershed review. collect flood plain information. 5. Prepare site analysis considering all of the fOllowing in a graphic format for presentation purposes: Natural Features Topography/slope Native vegetation/plant communities Water character/drainage Cultural Features Surrounding land uses Utilities Existing structures/roads B. Conceptual Design/Master Plan 1. Flesh out program; define specific facilities desired; provide alternatives and options to staff for input. 2. Coordinate user input/review meetings during master plan phase and provide support graphics as needed. . "ICHRll.Pl4 (C:\WP51\PROPOSAL\) Landscape Architecture 2612 Thomas Avenue / Dallas, Texas 75204 214/871-0568 Fax 214/871-1507 . GIRLS FAST PITCH SOFTBALL CENTER PROPOSAL NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PAGE 2 3. Prepare two conceptual design alternatives in freehand manner to includa at least all of the following elements: (6) Ball fields - 200' Park pavilion (I) Concession/Restrooms building (I) Hike and bike trail Connection to North Electric Trail Tree/plant massing 360 car parking lot and drives 100 Car Parking Expansion Lake or water feature Community playground Picnic facilities 4. Review alternative plans with Park staff for input. 5. Refine one conceptual design; prepare preliminary cost estimate. 6. Review with staff for comment and approval. C. Design Development ..... 1. Perform on the ground tree and topography survey for facilities to be constructed. » 2. Prepare base sheets on AutoCADD Release 12 at 1"=40' scale for overall site and I "=20' scale for detail areas. 3. Refine design of all recreation facilities such as ball fields, trails, playground, and picnic facilities. 4. Refine hardscape design; prepare materials palette for review. 5. Prepare architectural floor plans and elevations for all buildings and vertical structures; present materials palette. 6. Refine grading and lake development ideas, perform hydrology and hydraulics analysis. 7. Refine planting design; prepare introduced plant material palette for review. 8. Prepare preliminary utilities layout to include water, sewer and electrical. 9. Prepare conceptual lighting plan. 10. Prepare final design or provide cut sheets on all equipment for playground, picnic, bridges, etc. II. Prepare final design development plan on computer. 12. Prepare update cost estimate. 13. Review with staff for comment and approval on periodic basis. 14. Other plans as required. . D. Construction Documents 1. Prepare 100% construction documents on AutoCADD Release 12 with separate files for each sheet to include but not limited to all of the' following: a. Site layout plan. b. Site materials plan. c. Site grading plans, details and specifications. . _ICHHIL.Pl4 (C;\~1\PRQPOSAL \) .... . GIRLS FAST PITCH SOFTBALL CENTER PROPOSAL NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PAGE 3 d. Parking and roadway details and specifications. e. Civil engineering and drainage. f. Ball field plans, details and specifications. g. Architectural structures plans, details and specifications. h. Site electrical plans, details and specifications. i. Water and sewer utility plans, details and specifications. j. Planting plans, details and specifications. k. Irrigation plans, details and specifications. 1. Signage plans, details and specifications. m. Lighting plans, details and specifications. n. Trail details and specifications. o. Playground plans, details and specifications. p. Other plans as required. 2. The consultant will finalize all plans and prepare bid documents. 3. Prepare final cost estimate to make determination on alternates fur bi..! purposes. E. Bidding ~.. . 1. Consultant will coordinate all printing and bidding with City staff/purchasing department. 2. Coordinate pre- bid conference. 3. Attend bid opening. 4. Provide review/analysis of bids for City. ". Contract Administration/Construction Observation The Consultant will provide the following services during the construction phase: 1. Coordinate all pre-construction meetings. 2. Approve shop drawings. 3. Perform tree tagging/plant material approval. 4. Perform monthly site reviews. S. Perform all punchouts and document meetings. 6. Review and approval of all contractors involved. 7. Finalize job completion. 8. Perform one year guarantee punchout. 9. Visit site on an as needed basis. G. Meetings The Consultant will prepare to attend the following meetings as determined by the Park and Recreation Department: 1. Two (2) user meetings/workshops. 2. One (1) Park and Recreation Board Meeting. . IRICHHIL.PR4 (C:\WP51\PROPOSAL\) . GIRLS FAST PITCH SOFTBALL CENTER PROPOSAL NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PAGE 4 3. One (I) City Council Meeting. 4. Bi-weekly park staff progress meeting as appropriate. SPECIAL SERVICES A. Surveying 1. Boundarv Check - Utilizing the dead of record for the north tract and the survey of the south tract, the boundary will be located in the field and established for reference to the proposed site improvements. 2. Partial TOD02raDhic Survev - A complete topographic survey of the north tract will be made to the west creek top of bank. Individual tree ties will generally not be made except that the wooded areas along the creek shall be established by tying the trees along the edge of the clearing along the west bank. A strip survey along the proposed entrance road alignment through the south tract ~roximately 150' wide shall be made in the field. Quality hardwood trees 8" in diameter and larger shall be tied along the 150' strip. Design of ponds or other features along the eastern portion of the south tract shall be designed utilizing the City's topographic maps. . 3. Creek Sections - Sections of the main creek shall be made at selected locations as required to assist in the HEC-2 model creek studies described separately herein. ',\ 4. Public Utilitv Coordination - Public utilities shall be contacted to confirm existence of underground facilities. The public utilities shall be requested to flag their underground facilities in the field. The markings for utilities shall be field tied as a part of Item A-2 above. B. Floodplain Analysis, Hydraulic Studies 1. Effective Model - A copy of the effective HEC-2 model shall be obtained from FEMA and the model shall be coded into a digital file. The City may provide the effective model if available. 2. Revised Effective Model - Utilizing field cross sections provided in Item I above, we will modify the effective model based on infield survey sections where major deviations are noted (if any) in the effective model. . 3. Preliminarv Studies After the conceptual grading plan has been establishes the effective HEC-2 model shall be altered for the conceptual grading plan. The impact on floodplain elevations shall be determined. Preliminary earthwork calculations shall be performed to assist in making determinations regarding the final grading plan. The final grading plan may include adding ponds or alterations to limit import of fill material. .ICHHIL.PR4 (C: \\1»51 \PRQPOSAL \) . GIRLS FAST PITCH SOFTBALL CENTER PROPOSAL NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PAGE 5 4. Final Recommendations and Presentation - Recommendations will be provided in a brief letter report and a representative from Wier & Associates will be available for meetings and presentations to North Richland Hills Public Works Department and Park Board, and the City Counsel, as required. Changes to the proposed grading plan as a result of these meetings and presentations will be incorporated into the HEC-2 model. 5. Final Hvdraulic Studies - Based on the final grading plan, we will model the proposed multiple series HEC-2 run and the flood way run. We will delineate the proposed IOO-year floodplain based on the proposed models. We will submit the proposed models to the City Engineering Department and coordinate review and approval of the study. 6. Letter of MaD Amendment (LOMR) - After construction is completed we will prepare the forms and applications of the as-built floodplain for submittal to the FEMA for a LOMR. We will perform infield surveys to confirm the fill was placed in the locations required. The City will,jir~ct the contractor tCMIrovide the compaction tests results to confirm the fid ",.~. compacted to a'"ininimum 95% of Standard Proctor Density. C. Reimbursables . The Consultant will provide the following non-labor expense items to be reimbursed by the City: ',< 1. Soil Borin2s/Geotechnical ReDort Acquire ten (10) soil borings to a depth of approximately twenty feet. 2. Other Reimbursables The Consultant will utilize certain non-labor costs which will be billed to the client as follows. a. Photostats or photocopying b. Binding c. Printing - sets of construction documents for bidding and construction. d. Photography e. Mylars f. Delivery Fees g. Mailing h. Drawings not described in the Scope of Services i. Blue printing other than two sets of development design documents for the Owner J. Long distance telephone calls k. Mileage @ .30 I. Travel expenses m. Other products and services requested by the Client and not specifically described herein. . _ICHIIL.PR4 (C:\WP51\PRQPOSAL\) . GIRLS FAST PITCH SOFTBALL CENTER PROPOSAL NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PAGE 6 n. Facsimile o. CADD plotting D. Services Not Included l. Concrete testing for road/parking construction would be in General Contractor's scope. ADDITIONAL SERVICES A. 404 Permitting l. 404 Jurisdictional Determination - The proposed grading and construction alterations shall be submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for determination of compliance with the Nationwide Permit (NWP). The major areas of 404 jurisdiction on the site are anticipated to be within the main Walker's Branch Creek and the drainage way extending through the traç)-west of the main creek. The proposed improvements will impact the dråinage way and not the main creek. We anticipate all improvements proposed to impact substantially less than 1.0 acres of jurisdictional area and therefore anticipate compliance with the NWP. . 2. General Permit Conformance - We will coordinate with the USACE to establish a project scope in compliance with NWP requirements. We will provide necessary information to the USACE for public notification if any are required. .,< 3. Individual Proiect Permit - It is doubtful that the project canrot be designed to comply with NWP requirements. If in the future it i.; determined an individual permit is required, it shall be beyond the scope of this proposal and a separate proposal shall be negotiated at that time. B. NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges l. Pollution Prevention Plan (PPP) - We will prepare a PPP conforming to the General Permit provisions of the EPA for control of silt and erosion from storm runoff during the construction phase. 2. Notifications and Administrations - We will prepare instructions, forms and procedures within the plans and project specifications to direct the Contractor and City regarding submittal of the Notice of Intent (NOI) forms to comply with the General Permit and Notice of Termination (NOT) form for termination of the permit. We will provide requirements and directions for the contractor to provide monitoring during the construction phase ana record retention. . IRICHHIL.PR4 (C:\~1\PRQPOSAL \) . GIRLS FAST PITCH SOFfBALL CENTER PROPOSAL NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PAGE 7 COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT PHASE I - CITY FUNDED IMPROVEMENTS (51,250,000-51,500,000.00) DESIGN SERVICES A. Schematic Design Lump Sum Basis $27,500.00 B. Design Development Lump Sum Basis $27,500.00 C. Construction Documents Lump Sum Basis $27,500.00 D. Bidding Lump Sum Basis $ 5,500.00 E. Contract Administrþtion/Construction Observation Lump Sum Basis $22,500.00 SUBTOTAL DESIGN SERVICES 5110,000.00 . SPECIAL SERVICES A. Survey Hourly Basis Not To Exceed $ 7,100.00 .... B. Flood Plain Analysis/Hydrology and Hydraulics Lump Sum Basis $12,100.00 C. Reimbursables 1. Soil Borings 2. Other Reimbursables $3,000.00 $7,500.00 Allowance Not To Exceed $10,500.00 TOTAL FEES - PHASE I 5139,700.00 ADDITIONAL SERVICES A. Permitting (404 Permit and NPDES Permit) Lump Sum Basis $ 4,000.00 . _ICHII L .Pl4 (c: \\1»51 \PRCJIOSAI. \) GIRLS FAST PITCH SOFTBALL CENTER PROPOSAL NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PAGE 9 · D. Either Owner or Consultant may terminate this contract with thirty (30) days written notice. Upon termination, Owner will be responsible for payment of all Consultant fees and reimbursables expended through the date of termination. E. Compensation for all services shall be paid in Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. F. Payment Schedule: Bilting will be on a design progress basis at the end of each month. Submitted by: MESA DESIGN GROUP ÛdcJ Wiltiam T. Arterburn Principal ,~ Accepted by: · " , City of North Richland Hilts Date Return Copy Enclosed · IRICHHIL.PR4 (C:\WP51\PROPDSAL\) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance I Information Services Council Meeting Date: 1/8/96 Subject: Award Bid for GIS r.nlnr PlnttAr Agenda Number: PU 96-01 As part of the 1995/96 approved budget Council allocated funds for the purchase of a color plotter to be used by the GIS computer system. Formal bids were solicited for a Hewlett Packard DesignJet 755CM color plotter and complete installation. Only one complete bid was received from Piano CAD Engineering in the amount of $11,995. An incomplete bid was received from PC Age. This bid offered the equipment only with no installation or training support. Piano CAD and Engineering met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and can deliver the equipment in thirty days. The references checked spoke highly of the company and level of service they provide. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for a Hewlett Packard DesignJet 755 color plotter to Piano CAD Engineering in the amount of $11,995. . Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~perating Budget --X- .Other - .>fJ J Á1 ~ -, ~. J \. (jJ,. ./ ( ¥artment Head i~\crfe CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 16-01-06-6480 Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance I Information Services Council Meeting Date: 1 18/96 Subject: Award Contract for Long Distancp. Sp.rvicp. Agenda Number: PU 96-02 Request for Proposals were solicited for a company to provide long distance service for all City facilities. Listed below are the Bidders and the cost per minute for long distance use. Day Evening Weekends NTS Communications $0.13 $0.12 $0.11 Matrix Telecom $0.15 $0.15 $0.15 US Communications $0.14 $0.13 $0.1194 MCI Telecommunications $0.14 $0.14 $0.14 LDDS Communications $0.15 $0.15 $0.15 NTS is the current carrier for long distance service for City facilities so there would be no interruption in service or a need to re-assign long distance codes. NTS met all the specifications and general conditions of the proposal. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the contract for long distance service to NTS Communications. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ ~h~ _ (fl -, epartme~(natu'e P CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 16-01-04-4850 Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance I Information Services Council Meeting Date: 1/8/96 Subject: Approve Contract with Sip.mp.n~ Rnlm fnr Telephone PBX Maintenance Agenda Number: PU 96-03 The annual maintenance agreement with Siemens Rolm covering the telephone PBX equipment is now due. This agreement covers the equipment located in all City facilities for the amount of $23,458. The telephone system was provided and installed by Siemens Rolm so the maintenance agreement on the system should be with this company. Siemens Rolm has provided dependable s.ervice on the telephone system since it was installed. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council approve the annual maintenance agreement with Siemens Rolm for the telephone PBX equipment in the amount of $23,458. Finance Review He tI Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 16-01-04-3446 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance I Support Services Council Meeting Date: 1/8/96 Subject: Award Bid for Modular Furniture for the Planning and Inspections Department Agenda Number: PU 96-04 As a part of the City Hall renovation modular furniture shall be installed in the area designated for the Planning and Inspection Department. Formal bids were solicited for these items and the results are outlined below. Double D Company <..: m1.!,ª;!Q!4g $14,021 $14,656 B. T. Office Products .:.- Business Interiors B.T. Office Products met all the specifi'2.ations and general conditions of the bid and can deliver the modular furniture in thirty-five working days. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for the modular furniture to B.T. Office Products in the amount of $13,042. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) .opernting Budget _ ~ Other ~ t1 ~ epartment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number 13-70-96-6000 Sufficient Funds Available Finance Dltector Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~ Department: Public Works Award of Bid on Harmonson Road Paving, Drainage Subject: and Utility Improvements Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: 1 18/96 PW 96-01 Bids were received on this 1994 CIP bond project on December 19, 1995. The low bidders are shown below: ,...,..,..-". .,..... .....".."....".."..,........"--'..,,. >AlternateNo.jH ·Roádclóséd ·.tóTtÙ"ôÙ·· hTr'affiC ·«AltemateNo.2 . ........ ............ Road Oen to Throu h Traffic < Larry H. Jackson Construction $337,847.50 (150 Calendar Days) $356,592.42 (150 Calendar Days) $386,018.40 140 Calendar Da s $347,847.50 (170 Calendar Days) $357,092.42 (150 Calendar Days) $410,018.40 210 Calendar Da J.L. Bertram Construction, Inc. Ed Bell Construction Company This project will widen and reconstruct Harmonson Road from Mackey Creek to Scruggs Drive as a 30 foot concrete roadway with drainage and utility improvements. The following is an estimated schedule of construction: Award of Bid Preconstruction Conference Begin Construction End Construction January 8, 1996 January 19, 1996 January 29, 1996 July 22, 1996 Funding Source: The current budget for this project was approved in the 1995-96 Capital Projects Budget. The total General CIP amount budgeted for this project was $318,000 which included engineering and right-of-way. The amount budgeted for utility improvements was $177,000. Additional funds will be needed for construction and are outlined below: Drainage Imp. Total Additional Construction Bid Constructed Anticipated Funding Budget Amount with Rufe Snow Construction Cost Required General CIP $250,000 $317,318 $87,509 $404,827 $154,827 Utility CIP 159.300 30.530 0 30.530 0 Total $409.300 $347.848 $87.509 $435.357 $154.827 Finance Review Finance Director Page 1 of . . . The additional funds of $155,000 could be acquired as part of the 1996 General Obligation Bond Sale (GN 95-148). The proposed Hightower Drive, Phase C bond sale of $159,000 could be reduced to $4,000 and $155,000 reallocated to Harmonson Road. The $155,000 would be appropriated from the original unspecified Street Bond Funds of $2,350,000 as outlined in the 1994 Bond Election. Initial engineering and surveying for Hightower Drive, Phase C from Smithfield Road to Davis Boulevard could be rescheduled for October, 1996. From: 1996 G.O. Bond Sale $155,000 (Unspecified Street 1994 Bond Funds) To: Harmonson Road Improvements $155,000 Recommendation: Staff recommends Council award the contract to Larry H. Jackson Construction, Inc. for $347,847.50 (Alternate No.2, keeping the road open to through traffic during construction) for a period of 170 calendar days and appropriate funds as indicated above. . . . ~~ II I w E s Project Location October 5, 1995 . . . KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth· Dallas December 29, 1995 Honorable Mayor and City Council 7301 N .E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-376, CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS HARMONSON ROAD, PA VING, DRAINAGE, WA TER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS TABULA TION OF BIDS Bids were received on December 19, 1995, for the referenced project, and proposals were submitted from three (3) general contractors. A detailed bid tabulation is attached. The following is a summary of the bids for each Contractor by section, including a comparison of the low bid by Larry Jackson with the Engineer's Estimate dated October 3,1995: " ;"~:/':'~f -, o<:,',.:..Ji;¡..i"\····i,\41J"·,:j~,;,;,/""·:¡.¿"i,"',;~.:;~~~.f'¡"\~;'~~ú,';' ',';i:~:v.."'(..,i4~;¡;;."P.""':';-;;,i;:h;;i'..~··:~~l~~~~f ;~£.f;~J[' , ,¡,:ie' ",-" ;;\¡'JHARMONSON ROAD,'PAVlNG:DRAlNAGÈ, WATÈR AND SEWER iMPROVEMENTS tit?, , ,'-~." ...~:: " -," -;'SUMMARY OF BIDS BY SECTION;;:" ALTERNATE 1; CLOSE ROAD DURING CONSTRUCTÌON', , "'>'-"<.-;<'-,." ~; , CONTRACTOR DAYS PAVING DRAINAGE WATER SEWER TOTAL BID 1. Larry H. Jackson 150 $256,485.75 $50,831.75 $18,380.00 $12,150.00 $337,847.50 2. J.L. Bertram 150 266,484.74 55,021.58 21,103.10 13.983.00 356,592.42 3. Ed Bell 140 276,303.90 66,350.50 25,724.00 17,640.00 3B6,018.40 EnQineer's Estimate * - 267,708.50 66,186.00 26.538.00 1 1,390.00 371,822.50 Low Bid Under Estim. - 11,222.75 15,354.25 8,158.00 -760.00 I 33,975.00 I * En9ineer's Estimate of Construction Cost (copy attached), October 3, 1995, based on Design Quantities and Recent Unit Prices of Construction for Similar C.I.P. Projects in North Richland Hills. ;:[:;;~é~:t0,ff}t~tY~0<~j:;~~.$::;;"~-~'Ú%7~\,,~~!'1>ò,,;:t'&~~~M~~~~~t-;i1:t;~,'1~4~tt>.-":;>~;;%t¡Í7f;1:J;~~t~~ú¡~-;.;.~~' ;¡i'itV; HARMONSONROAD,' PAVING, . DRAINAGE; 'WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ÜMMARYOF BIDS BY SECTION :::"AL TERNATE 2; KEEP ROAD OPEN TO THROUGH TRAFFIC CONTRACTOR DAYS PAVING DRAINAGE WATER SEWER TOTAL BID 1. La H. Jackson 170 $266,485.75 $50,831.75 $18,380.00 $12,150.00 $347,847.50 2. J.L. Bertram 150 266,984.74 55,021.58 21,103.10 13,983.00 357,092.42 3. Ed Bell 210 300,303.90 66,350.50 25.724.00 17,640.00 410,018.40 . En ineer's Estimate * 267.708.50 66,186.00 26.538.00 11 ,390.00 371,822.50 Low Bid Under Estim. 1,222.75 15,354.25 8,158.00 -760.00 23,975.00 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211. METRO 817/267-3367. FAX 817/354-4389 . . . . Page 2 December 29, 1995 Harmonson Road, Paving, Drainage, Water and Sewer Improvements Bid Tabulations and Recommendation of Contract Award This project includes the following work: 1. Paving -- 6" Thick, 31-foot BIB concrete pavement from the Mackey Creek Channel (located west of Rufe Snow) to Scruggs Drive. Also included are sidewalks along each side of the roadway, and new drivewa~ approaches to replace existing asphalt and gravel drives. The concrete paving bid by Larry H. Jackson was $19.75 per square yard, which is lower than the Engineer's Estimate of $20.00 per square yard, based on recent bid prices for concrete. 2. Drainage -- This includes underground storm drain construction in Harmonson Road which is designed to convey the 100-year discharge in accordance with the latest Public Works Design Manual requirements. 3. Water -- This includes replacement of 8-inch water lines as required to accommodate the underground storm drain improvements. 4. Sewer -- This includes replacement of 4-inch sanitary sewer service lines due to the storm drain improvements. The bid by Larry Jackson is under the recent engineer's estimate of construction cost for both Alternates. Alternate 1 is based on closing the road to through traffic during construction. Alternate 2 includes an extra $10,000 cost bid to keep the roadway open to through traffic at all times during construction. We would note that the original budget for this project was based on an asphalt street in lieu of a concrete street (which is the current City standard), and the actual storm drain work required is more extensive than the original preliminary, pre- design, cost estimates anticipated. (See our letter dated December 4, 1995, which discusses this in detail). The low bidder, Larry H. Jackson Construction, Inc., has recently complete other projects in North Richland Hills including the Timberhill Drainage Improvements, the Woods Lane Drainage Improvements project, the North Forty/Greenwood Way drainage project, the Walkers Branch Channel Improvements, Phase I, and the Watauga Road (East) utility adjustments. Larry J. Jackson is also currently constructing the Rodger Line Drive project and the Rufe Snow Drive paving and drainage improvements from Onyx Drive North to Glenview Drive. This contractor has performed well on all of these projects. Based on the bids received, and in the absence of any negative reports concerning the low bidder, we would recommend contract award to Larry H. Jackson Construction, Inc., 5112 Sun Valley Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76119, in the total amount of $337,847.50, for a period . . . . Page 3 December 29, 1995 Harmonson Road, Paving, Drainage, Water and Sewer Improvements Bid Tabulations and Recommendation of Contract Award of 150 Calendar Days (Alternate 1 - Close Road), or in the total amount of $347,847.50 for a period of 170 Calendar Days (Alternate 2 - Keep Road Open). We will be available at the January 8, 1996, Council meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. tI/, Ck-:-- RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RW NralEnclosures/Bids.376 xc: Mr. C.A. Sanford, City Manager Mr. Randy Shiflet, Assistant City Manager Mr. Larry Cunningham, Assistant City Manager Mr. Charles Harris, Director of Finance Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works Mr. Mike Curtis, P .E., Capital Projects Coordinator Mr. Mark Bradley, R.O.W. Agent , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Approve Budget Revision for Nor'east Drive Subject: Storm Drain F}{tAn~inn Council Meeting Date: 1/8/96 Agenda Number: PW 96-02 The Public Works Construction Division completed the extension of the storm drain as approved by Council on September 11, 1995 in PW 95-59. The initial budget was $20,000. Final cost to the City was $26,917. The additional cost was due to the extra thick rock encountered during our grading downstream of the pipe outlet and the unanticipated amount of spoil material that had to be hauled off. Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available in the Street Division's StreeUDrainage Maintenance Account (01-60-04-3080) to fund this additional cost. From: 01-60-04-3080 $6,920 To: Nor'east Drive 36-inch Storm Drain Extension $6,920 Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve a budget increase of $6,920 for this project and appropriate the funds as indicated above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budge h Finance Director ~'-- Page 1 of . CITY OF N@RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Wor1<s December 14, 1995 Memo to: Greg Dickens Public Works Director From: David Smyth Construction Superintendent Subject: NOREAST STORM DRAIN . In October 1995, the Construction Division extended the storm drain on the West end of Noreast Dr. approximately 600 ft. This construction consisted of installing 600 ft. of 36" storm drain pipe, construcion of a grated headwall and grading the remainder of the ditch to drain into the Calloway Branch channel. During excavation for the pipe we encountered rock which we had to dig through to get the proper elevation on the pipe. The amount of spoil material we hauled from the site was more than we had anticipated as well. In turn, this required more man hours than were initially calculated for this job. This is reason the cost was somewhat higher than budgeted. If you need any additional information on this project please contact me. Sincerely, UCM95036 . P.O. Box 820609 .. North Richland Hills, Texas.. 76182-0609 7200 A Dick Fisher Dr. S." 817-581-5671 .. FAX 817-656-7552 .ate December 8, 1995 repared by: David Smyth Noreast Drive 36" Storm Sewer (West of Noreast Drive) CONSTRUCTION DIVISION COST Material Unit ~ Price Amount 36" ADS Pipe I.f. 600 $17.93 $10,758 1" Crushed Stone ton 322 $10.75 $3,462 Type P Concrete Headwall ea 1 $1,084.50 $1 ,085 Rental Equipment I.s. 1 $4,300.00 $4,300 Labor I.s. 1 $5,399.00 $5,399 Overhead mo 0.25 $2,500.00 $625 Engineering I.s. 1 $325.00 $325 Waste Hauling I.s. 1 $764.00 $764 Misc. Materials I.s. 1 $200.00 ~ TOTAL $26,917 . Contractors Estimate Material 36" ADS Pipe Engineering Type P Headwall Grade to Drain Unit I.f. I.s. I.s. I.s. Qtï., 600 1 1 1 Price $60.25 $325.00 $2,500.00 $2,000.00 Amount $36,150 $325 $2,500 $2 000 $40,975 $26,917 TOTAL Const. Div. Total Total Savings 34.31% . ~,/1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ¥ I Department: Public Works Approve Budget for~No~~ast Drive f StocmDrain Extension ': Council Meeting Date: 9/11/95 Subject: Agenda Number: PW 95-59 The existing underground 36-inch diameter storm drain from the Scott Drive and Noreast Drive intersection was stubbed out west on Noreast Drive to the edge of the Birdville ISO property and plugged. Existing curb inlets at this intersection are plugged and currently do not function. All runoff currently flows overland through this intersection westerly onto the BISD property into a swale which carries it across the newly graded baseball park area to the Calloway Branch Channel. The Public Works Department will have sufficient funds in our 0 & M budget (01-60-04-3080) to pay for the materials and labor for this project. It is proposed the Public Works Construction Division install the storm drain pipe in an effort to conserve funds but provide the underground storm drain system which was originally begun with the old Holiday East Addition development. Funding Source: I. Sufficient funds are available in the Street Division's StreeUDrainage Maintenance account (01- 60-04-3080) to fund this project. From: 01-60-04-3080 $20,000 To: Noreast Drive 36-inch Storm Drain Extension $20,000 Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve a budget of $20,000 for this project and appropriate the funds as indicated above. COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED 0 DISAPPR V D COMMENTS:~ Finance Review Source of Funds: .onds (GO/Rev.) _ perating Budget _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Availa Ie Fln.,,~ 0..<10' Page 1 of ~~/' "~o'" -y-'--~~o~bP~:;;~~/.··[' " - .. I Lr--J ' ,~ - ';'?:':.~}~__h Ý i '9~Z ' ' , , ' -' ' h - .': '" ," '__ '/__ I;-r'" ~>< C.-r- !'·~~~':?~~~i-~-==-::.;:.;.~g~~~~ ~.~~',~ ~~ .:~~~ :0., - _:~~:-:'-:-,~\~.;-: ~~~-9-/.. ,~4.~ \W~~ ,I , _ , r--"- ., _ . , _ '~-..;... ~ ) ..:.-( \. -' I ~i/ '. .,'" ~"'v-;-.'~___~ ~'.. .- x50~J' \ ' " ~ I ~ ,.--.....: '-",-..,.-..;;=;:;:::ç.:::--- ....."V"',-..,,~ _ .. I ; .r r-\ V ~ I \, \ _ ~I (., /--ffi' " "::::=: ;~0,", '1-,., :'- \, ......""" - --' , L //1 ,1 '...._..__-... ", ~. ::1 . , , II 'f ..f.... \ ¡\ '-~ .. ~.. '; :\ .'-- ~/-- : \ /Í".. - \ - ( --I \ r I X 599. 1 \\' \ ~ ,'~ \" " r / ,~ f ~ ,J'.-........ . : ') /,> "... '--,-J-'" ';'-" tJ i I ,( ~ ---. "'"" ,> ,,--,~~'\- II ! '\..' /' '. '..._~.. ,/ '-' ('t ''=-~ ,/ ¡ I ' !. . !.,. , ' rl- ~~ , J ~ ~ " .'-.' . \, , ~ ~., ~TOf2N1 ,,' :: -= .~: . I ¡ I i: ! '\.....,/. / ~};- '. -.' ._~....., \ -----____.... .r__. --.-.... :::......... x 5ù~J . j .." ,.:. ,:~;;.~.: '.- / :/.,~/ ..-:::~ -----//; ",",- .---'"'"' .~~// '. ¿.' /,' ------/'~~ " .~~.~~..:.:<... ,- ~:~9~ . .: .: /. " '. ...~ 591.2 x " '. \ \ i.1 ) ( 1 , :~.;,~ . :;. "- B~-' "'-, ~!" ? . ~ :'."; .. ~" r , , , , ....... '.', \ . \'\ "':1 ,','\ \\ ; \ \ ",\ /\\\\'\ " :' \ \ \ \ , I ! .... ~." '0' "',,: :.. ~I;..···'...··/·/ "..."-..--........, : '-.." f \ ,- " 59 .5 }.../ .......---., ...... , ... J , ~'jè 'j. I o i \ ~ -;;:y:~ !() ~' \\j.< \ '" ?Q , '0 ~ }-~~~~~J~ ~.\.,.". . . "...·r; -1 .~ - _,..,......,L_.. _,,, , ,r-..__ . \ ::'';7 7\\ .".'. . \ , , " . -...-.. ...... ~~ 2. CdS . O~\:' t. AER I AL SURVEYS, I NC. "!~C)Tí ~!·:;R/\~r)~. ¡' . ','J . 1 1\: .-' : ~ I:.... T~!S MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL ,....A? "CCURACY STANDARDS BOHI I~, GR I D L (NES A~JO ON THE TEXAS <: ~ '- ':':' ~ ;,' ¡O f:.'!_=- \:A: t Qt'.. ... -' ¡ ~: ,." ,.:( I.': I , , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Approve Supplemental Agreement No. 1 with the Subject: State of Texas for the Reconstruction of Rufe Snow Agenda Number: Drive from I.H. 820 to Watauga Road -Resolution No. 96-02 1/08/96 PW 96-03 On November 14, 1994 (PW 94-39), Resolution No. 94-59 authorized the Mayor to execute an agreement for the Rufe Snow Project. The project will be partially funded by the federal government through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1994 (ISTEA). The federal funds obligated to the project by this Surface Transportation Program - Metropolitan Mobility Rehabilitation (STP-MM) agreement are $3,041,000. The original agreement described the City being responsible for the engineering, right-of-way (ROW) documents, ROW acquisition, utility adjustments, and maintenance. The agreement also specified that the City will be~reimbursed for the engineering at approximately 80% from the federal funds. The original agreement did not specify that the City would be reimbursed for ROW acquisition. Supplemental Agreement No.1 revises the original agreement to include reimbursement at approximately 80% for ROW acquisition. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve Resolution No. 96-02. rinance Review Source of Funds: .sonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating udget_ Other Accl. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ ~~ Finance Dlrecta< CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of . . . RESOLUTION NO. 96-02 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: The Mayor be, and is hereby authorized and directed to execute Supplemental Agreement NO.1 to the ISTEA/STP-MM Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation dealing with construction of appurtenances to Rufe Snow Drive from I. H. 820 to Watauga Road as the act and deed of the City. ç 2. A copy of said Supplemental Agreement NO.1 is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and made a part hereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this 8th day of January, 1996. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City . . . EXHIBIT "A" Agreement No.SXXF6022 CSJ: 0902-48-193 Rufe Snow Drive: From: IH 820 To: Watauga Road THE STATE OF TEXAS THE COUNTY OF TRAVIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 FOR THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM - METROPOLITAN MOBILITY REHABILITATION This supplemental agreement to the Surface Transportation Program is made by and between the State of Texas, acting by and through the District Engineer of the Texas Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the "State", and City of North Richla~_Hills, hereinafter called the "City". WHEREAS, the State and the-City executed an agreement on the 3rd day of February, 1995, and entered ìñto an agreement concerning the improvements under the Surface Transportation Program; and, WHEREAS, this agreement was originally for reimbursement of engineering; and, NOW THEREFORE, premises considered, the State and the City agree that said agreement is amended as follows: Page 3 of 11. It has become necessary to amend Article 3 of the agreement, Acquisition of Right of Way, to revise and add wording to reimburse the City for right-of-way acquisition as follows: 3.ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY A. The City shall assume all costs and perform all necessary requirements to provide title in name of city to the desired right-of-way required for the construction of the Project, which title shall be acceptable to the State. The City shall provide all right-of-way free and clear of all improvements and/or encroachments. The city will comply with and assume the costs for compliance with all the requirements of Title II and Title III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Title 42 U.S.C.A. section 4601, et seq., including those provisions relating to incidental expenses incurred by the property owners in conveying the right-of- way to the City, and benefits applicable to the relocation of any displaced person as defined in 49 CFR, 24.2(g). Documentation to support such compliance must be maintained and must be made available to the State and its representatives for review and inspection. The City shall secure and provide easements over any other land in additional to normal right-of-way as may be indicated on the approved right-of-way map. The City will be responsible for any additional right-of-way required for the completion of the Project. B. In the event the right-of-way is donated to the City after the federal authorization date for acquisition of right-of-way the City will provide all documentation to the State regarding the value of the acquired property. The State will review the City's appraisal of the donated property to determine the fair market value. The fair market value of donated right-of-way will be credited towards the City's financial share towards the cost of the project. Page 1 of 3 . C. The state will not reimburse the city any funds in the event the right-~ way was purchased before written authorization by the state or the fair marke. value of the donated property exceeds the City's financial share towards the project. D. The City agrees to make a determination of property values for each right- of-way parcel by methods acceptable to the state and to submit to the State's District Office a tabulation of the values so determined, signed by the appropriate city representative. Such tabulations shall list the parcel numbers, ownership, acreage and recommended compensation. Compensation shall be shown in the component parts of land taken, itemization of improvements taken, damages ( if any) and the amounts by which the total compensation will be reduced if the owner retains improvements. This tabulation shall be accompanied by an explanation to support the determined values, together with a copy of information or reports used in arriving at all determined values. Expenses incurred by the City in performing this work may be eligible for reimbursement after the City has received written authorization by the state to proceed with deter~ination of right-of-way values. The State will review the data submitted a~may base its reimbursement for parcel acquisitions on the values which are determìned by this review. . E. Condemnation proceedings will be initiated at a time selected by the City and will be the City's responsibility at its own expense as hereinafter indicated. The City will concurrently file condemnation proceedings and a notice of lis pendens for each case in the name of the City, and in each case so filed the judgment of the court will decree to the City title to the property condemned. F. Court costs of Special Commissioners' hearings assessed against the City in condemnation proceedings and fees incidental thereto will be paid by the City. Such costs and fees incurred after written authorization by the State to proceed with condemnation will be eligible for reimbursement at an amount not to exceed eighty percent (80%) of the actual cost under the established reimbursement procedure provided such costs and fees are eligible for payment. G. Reimbursement will be made to the City for right-of-way purchased in an amount not to exceed eighty percent (80%) of the cost of the right-of-way purchased in accordance with the terms and provisions of this agreement. Reimbursement will be in the amount not to exceed eighty percent (80%) of the State's predetermined value of each parcel, or the net cost thereof, whichever is the lesser amount. In addition, reimbursement will be made to the City for necessary payments to appraisers, expenses incurred in order to assure good title to property acquired and costs associated with the relocation of displaced persons or personnel property as well as incidental expense incurred in conveying the needed right-of-way to the state. Reimbursement shall not exceed eighty percent (8 0%) of such documented costs. If condemnation is necessary and title is taken as set forth herein under the section entitled "condemnation", the participation by the state shall be based on the final judgment, conditioned upon the State having been notified in writing prior to the filing of such suit and upon prompt notice being given as to all action taken therein. . All other terms and conditions of the contract are unchanged and remain in full force and effect. Page 2 of 3 . . . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the State and the city have signed duplicate counterparts of this agreement. THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: (Name) (Title) (Date) ç ATTEST: city Secretary THE STATE OF TEXAS Executed for the Executive Director and approved for the Texas Transportation Commission under the Authority of Stand Alone Manual Notice, 95-4, for the purpose and effect of activating and/or carrying out the orders, established policies, or work programs by the Texas Transportation Commission. APPROVED: BY: Charles W. Heald, P.E. District Engineer DATE: Page 3 of 3 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance I Police Department Council Meeting Date: 1/8/96 Subject: ÄIJthnri7p. P~ymp.nt tn Mntorol~ fnr M~intenance Agreement - Resolution No. 96-03 Agenda ~umber: PAY 96-01 The annual maintenance agreement for all Motorola radios and related equipment is now due in the amount of $97,542.65. The City receives a discount if this agreement is paid annually instead of monthly. The Department is re-paid a large portion of this amount from income from the Inter-Local agreements with other area Cities. Fundinq Source: 03-91-00-3460 $79,621.34 16-01-01-4460 $17,921.31 Recommendation: It is recommended City Council approve Resolution No. 96-03 authorizing payment to Motorola Communications for annual maintenance charges in the amount of $97,542.65. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operatin Budget_ Other artment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Dlredor Page 1 of . . . RESOLUTION NO. 96-03 WHEREAS, the City has a continuing contract with Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. To provide service for all radios and related Motorola equipment; and WHEREAS, the total annual amount for the period from October 1, 1995 through September 30, 1996 was billed by Motorola as $105,001.90; and WHEREAS, paying the total amount annually the City receives a discount resulting in a total payment of $97,542.65 rather than $105,001.90 which was billed by Motorola on December 11, 1995. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS THAT: The City Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to pay the annual charge by Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. in the amount of $97,542.65 from the following accounts: 03-91-00-3460 $79,621.34 16-01-01-4460 $17,921.31 PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 8th DAY OF JANUARY, 1996. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 1/8/96 Subject: Ratify Payment tn Wnrth RLJ~ine~~ Fnrm~ fnr Printing of Budget Books and Capital Budget Report Agenda Number: PAY 96-02 Bids are solicited annually for the printing of the approved Operating Budget books and the Financial Report. This year the Capital Projects Budget was added to this order as a separate document. During the bidding process the number of pages in each book are estimated. Worth Business Forms was awarded the bid for this printing in the amount of $4,870. After the information is submitted to the printer and the layout is finalized we get an accurate number of pages to be printed. Each book had more pages than originally estimated and as a result of these additions the total price of the order shall increase to $5,699.92. Fundino Source Sufficient funds are available in the following accounts: 01-20-05-4800 02-20-05-4800 01-99-01-4800 Recommendation: It is recommended City Council ratify the payment to Worth Business Forms in the amount of $5,699.92 Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ .Operating Budget X- Other~, Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM See Above Finance Director Page 1 of