The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1996-02-26 Agendas . -_.._..~---.----_.__. CITY OF N*RTH RICHLAND HILLS .---- Office of the City Secretary February 23, 1996 ITEM ADDED TO THE FEBRUARY 26,1996 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 26a. PW 96-15 Approve Agreement for Engineering Services with Carter & Burgess, Inc. For Sanitary Sewer Overflow Abatement Study . POSTED óJ, -;;, 3-9 0 Date )/: 65 a(}~ Time //_j) City secr, etary By (LIV.£d-~~m~.'m____,___,. . P.O. Box 820609 " North Richland Hills, Texas· 76182-0609 USA 7301 Northeast Loop 820 ,,817 -581-5502" FAX 817-581-5516 . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 26, 1996 - 6:05 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills Community Center in the Municipal Court Room, 6720 Northeast Loop 820. . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. PZ 95-26 Consider the Request of HSM Development to Rezone Tracts 3, 3A3, 3A4, 3A3A, 3B, 3A3B, and 4A 1, Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from AG Agriculture to a Planned Development (Located in the 7000 block of Hightower Drive) (Public Hearing Closed at the January 22, 1996 Council Meeting) - Ordinance No. 2095 (Agenda Item No.8) (5 Minutes) 2. PZ 96-03 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Southwestern Bell Telephone for a Special Use Permit for a Telephone Switching Station on Lot 9, Block 38, Richland Terrace Addition (Located at 7201 Maplewood Avenue) - Ordinance No. 2103 (Agenda Item No. 11) and Public Hearing to Consider the Request of PZ 96-04 Southwestern Bell Telephone for a Special Use Permit for a Telephone Switching Station on Tract 2B3A6, Van Dusen Survey, Abstract 1588 (Located at 4251 Rufe Snow Drive) - Ordinance No. 2104 (Agenda Item No. 12) and PW 96-14 Approve the Sale of Lot 9, Block 38, Richland Terrace Addition to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company - Resolution No. 96-15 (Agenda Item No. 26) (10 Minutes) 3. GN 96-24 Approve Speed Zone Change on I.H. 820 and S.H. 121 - Ordinance No. 2100 (Agenda Item No. 13) (5 Minutes) e e . . Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 4. GN 96-27 Consideration of a Recommendation to Amend the Public Works Design Manual Regarding Masonry Screening Walls - Resolution No. 96-16 (Agenda Item No. 16) (10 Minutes) 5. PU 96-22 Award Bid for Facility Enhancements at NRH20 (Agenda Item No. 23) (5 Minutes) 6. PU 96-24 Award Bid for Office Furniture (Agenda Item No. 25) (5 Minutes) 7. Other Items Rem inder: City Council Meeting Scheduled for March 11, 1996 Canceled 8. *Executive Session (35 Minutes) - The Council may enter into closed executive session to discuss the following: A. Consultation with attorney under Gov. Code §551.071 : Consider Watauga vs. NRH 19 I Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. I I *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. e . e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 26, 1996 For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills Community Center in the Municipal Court Room, 6720 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items marked with an * are on the consent agenda and will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 581-5502 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting February 12, 1996 5. Presentations by Boards & Commissions e . e Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 7. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (13, 14, 19,20,21,22, & 24) 8. PZ 95-26 Consider the Request of HSM Development to Rezone Tracts 3, 3A3, 3A4, 3A3A, 3B, 3A3B, and 4A 1, Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from AG Agriculture to a Planned Development (Located in the 7000 block of Hightower Drive) - (Public Hearing Closed at the January 22, 1996 Council Meeting) - Ordinance No. 2095 9. PZ 96-01 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Charles Bradley to Rezone Tract 4B3, Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from Agriculture to R-1-S (Special Single Family Residential) (Located at 7104 Douglas Lane) - Ordinance No. 2102 10. PZ 96-02 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Teresa Trusty to Rezone Lot 1, Block D, Richland Oaks Addition from R-1 Single Family Residential to C-1 Commercial (Located at 4801 Strummer Drive) - Ordinance No. 2105 e . e Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 11. PZ 96-03 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Southwestern Bell Telephone for a Special Use Permit for a Telephone Switching Station on Lot 9, Block 38, Richland Terrace Addition (Located at 7201 Maplewood Avenue) - Ordinance No. 2103 12. PZ 96-04 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Southwestern Bell Telephone for a Special Use Permit for a Telephone Switching Station on Tract 2B3A6, Van Dusen Survey, Abstract 1588 (Located at 4251 Rufe Snow Drive) - Ordinance No. 2104 *13. GN 96-24 Approve Speed Zone Change on I. H. 820 and S.H. 121 - Ordinance No. 2100 *14. GN 96-25 Approve "No Parking at Anytime" Zone on the North Side 7300 Chapman Road east to 7312 Chapman Road - Ordinance No. 2101 15. GN 96-26 Appointment of City Secretary and Assistant City Secretary 16. GN 96-27 Consideration of a Recommendation to Amend the Public Works Design Manual Regarding Masonry Screening Walls - Resolution No. 96-16 e . e . Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 17. GN 96-28 Appointment of Crime Control and Prevention District Board of Directors - Resolution No. 96-17 18. GN 96-29 Concealed Weapons in City Owned Buildings - Ordinance No. 2106 *19. PU 96-18 Award Bid for Installation of a Fuel Tank Management System at Fire Station One *20. PU 96-19 Award of Bid to Sharrock Electric, Inc. for Traffic Signalization on Mid- Cities Boulevard at Holiday Lane *21. PU 96-20 Authorize Purchase of Big Squirt Water Toy *22. PU 96-21 Award Bid for Installation of Tube Slide at NRH20 23. PU 96-22 Award Bid for Facility Enhancements at NRH20 *24. PU 96-23 Award Bid for Cubix Processor Cards for Computer Upgrade 25. PU 96-24 Award Bid for Office Furniture e . e Page 5 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 26. PW 96-14 Approve the Sale of Lot 9, Block 38, Richland Terrace Addition to Southwestern Bell Telpehone Company - Resolution No. 96-15 27. Citizens Presentation 28. Adjournment 'POSTED ;,{- :Å..-5 ·9& Date 1/.'3,;2. a /YL Time City Secretary at;? ,fJ~ INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 96-20 + Date: February 21, 1996 Subject: Notification of TNRCC G(ant On Tuesday, February 20, the NCTCOG Resource Conservation Council met to make the final determination on funding for projects submitted for TNRCC's Solid Waste Project Funds. As you are aware, we submitted a grant for a Four-City Yard Waste Reduction Partnership Project totaling $84,715 encompassing the cities of North Richland Hills, Richland Hills, Hurst and Haltom City. We have been notified verbally that this project is one of only 29 to be funded in this first round of submissions. We will be receiving written confirmation in the next week. The project design calls for the establishment of demonstration composting sites in each of the four cities, an educational program using the Texas Agricultural Extension Service "Don't Bag It" campaign and a training program for Master Composters and Master Gardeners. The goal of the project is to encourage reduction in yard waste going into our dwindling land fill space and to promote uses for compost materials. Funding has been built into the project budget to pay for contract services to design and administer the 1 8-month program to eliminate the need for additional personnel on staff. The Environmental Services Departmer1t, working with our Finance Department, will administer the grant funds through reimbursement procedures with NCTCOG for the entire project. We will be presenting an Agreement of Understanding in the next several weeks to each of the four City Councils for their formal approval as the first step in beginning the project. Funds will be available in late March to start the project. We are excited about being chosen and believe that this is the first project of its kind to be recognized for funding by TNRCC. With the funding of this project, we have now satisfied all of the requirements for membership into the Clean City 2000 Program and will submit application in the next few weeks. In addition to receiving this grant, we have been notified that our Ozone Action Ale-rt program has been chosen as a semifinalist for the Governor's Award for Environmental Excellence. We expect to hear soon if we are chosen as a finalist, but have been informed that it is very prestigious to have made the semifinalists stage. ~IIY Submitted, tiam Burn~ Environmental Services Director CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS · · · INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 96-21 ~ Date: T Subject: February 26, 1996 D.A.R.E. Evaluation During the presentation of the Consultants report on the Police Department it was observed that no studies have shown that the D.A.R.E. programs actually reduced the use of drugs by children exposed to the program. It was suggested that when (if) the State D.A.R.E. program was evaluated the City Council would like to review the results. To date, no such study has been released in Texas, however, a recent publication from the Rocky Mountain Behavioral Science Institute in Fort Collins, Colorado included the results of a Statewide D.A.R.E. evaluation in Ohio. Five pages relating to the effectiveness of D.A.R.E. and the drug use trends among elementary school children are attached for information purposes. We were pleased to see that 15% higher high school aged children reported "low drug involvement" if they have had D.A.R.E. than if they had not participated in a D.A.R.E. program. This success, as you can see, was distributed across the spectrum in all areas. K~~~ Ct~éf~f Police Id Attachments ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS THE AMERICAN DRUG AND ALCOHOL SURVEyTM Preliminary Results: A State-Wide D.A.R.E. Evaluation by Joseph Donnenneyer, Ph.D. The Ohio State University To continue receiving News & Views, please contact us at: The most widely utilized prevention education program today in the U.S. is D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education). D.A.R.E. is typically targeted at the 5th and 6th grade levels, although the curricwum has been expanded to include lower elementary, junior high and senior high students. D.A.R.E. has not been without controversy. Some critics dislike the use of police officers as instructors. Others contend tha t D.A.R.E. has not lived up to its promises, citing pre- and post- test evaluations that would indicate little or no reduction in drug involvement among participants. Supporters of the program respond by contending that pre/post-test evaluations of participants at the 5th and 6th grades are not useful because these students have not reached the age when W1derage drinking and substance use becomes prevalent. As was reported in the last issue of News & Views, a statewide study of D.A.R.E. was recently W1dertaken in Ohio. This study included three phases: Phase I, a survey of school personnel; Phase IT, a survey of students utilizing the standard American Drug and Alcohol SurveyTM, plus the Program Evaluation Insert that focuses on factors common to most prevention education programs, particularly D.A.R.E.; and Phase ill, a survey of parents which will soon be W1derway. The student survey was conducted among 11th graders because the interest was in exploring potential long-term influences of D.A.R.E. Four types of schools were included in this study: high schools who sponsor the senior high D.A.R.E. program and who have D.A.R.E. in their feeder elementary and junior high schools; high schools without D.A.R.E. who have feeder elementary and junior high schools with the program; high schools without D.A.R.E. who have feeder elementary schools with the program but junior high schools without it; and high schools without D.A.R.E. who have no feeder schools with D.A.R.E. Results indicate that 11th grade students who have participated in Ó.A.R.E. at two different grade levels show lower overall drug involvement than 11 th graders who have never Continued on page 4 The ADAS and Program Evaluation insert were used with . 11th graders to explore potential long-term influences of D.A.R.E. Do 1/011 ((Il1Izt to recCÍ'uejlltllre isslles of News & Views? RMBSI, Inc. 419 Canyon Avenue Suite 316 Fort Collins, CO 80521 1-800-447-6354 . . . findings indicate that the impact of elementary school D.A.R.E. training is enhanced by additional D.A.R.E. training in junior high and/or high school and that as a prevention education program, the primary impact is from early .ntervention. . Continued fro In page 1 been exposed to the D.A.R.E. program (see Figures 1 and 2). A further finding was that among those students who only had D.A.R.E. at one grade level, overall drug involvement was lower for those who had it in elementary school only than for students who had it in either the junior high or high school level only. These findings indicate that the impact of elementary school D.A.R.E. training is enhanced by additional D.A.R.E. training in junior high and/ or high school and that as a prevention education program, the primary impact is from early intervention. Figure 1 11th Graders Who Have Had D.A.R.E. 2+ Times Low Drug Involvomont (72%) Figure 2 Moderate Drug Involvement (27"10) Using The American Drug and Alcohol SurveyTM with the Program Evaluation Insert allowed us to measure a variety of behavioral and attitudinal outcomes as well as current drug involvement. For example, D.A.R.E. 11th graders showed higher peer resistance than non-D.A.R.E. 11th graders. Eleventh graders who had been through D.A.R.E. indicated it would be easier for them to say "no" to close friends who suggest they use drugs than it was for non-D.A.R.E. students. In addition, when compared to non-D.A.R.E. 11 th graders, those who had been in D.A.R.E. were more likely to indicate that they would try to stop friends from using drugs and they were less likely to have friends who would encourage them to get drunk and use drugs. In addition to lower drug involvement and peer pressure resistance, a third positive outcome of this statewide D.A.R.E. evaluation was the finding that 11th graders who had participated in the program scored higher on a scale tha t measured their communication with family members about the dangers of drugs. These results are encouraging for D.A.R.E. and for alcohol and drug prevention education programs in general. Prevention education is not a cure-all for the underage drinking and drug use problems of youth. But the results from the Ohio evaluation do show that educational efforts reinforce peer resistance skills and commwÜcation within the family about the consequences of substance use and that positive movement toward lower drug involvement can be demonstrated. Evaluations don't have to be complicated and inaccessible to the general public and program supporters. They should provide valid and reliable information in an easily understandable format. The Ohio study was able to accomplish its student evaluation goals quickly and economically and deliver usable results to media and policymakers. . The AOAS with the Program Evaluation insert can now be used to assess your local O.A.R.E. programs. Please call RMBSl at 1-800-447-6354 for more information. Joseph Oonnermeyer, PhO is a nationally known speaker/trainer on ,the benefits of prevention education. Ncws alld Vic7vs Sprillg 1996 4 What's Going On? .by Fred Beauvais, Ph.D. Drug use in the u.s. is definitely on the upswing. The latest report from the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan confirms that the increase in drug use among adolescents that began in 1991 continued through the spring of 1995. These increases are observable in the 8th, 10th and 12th grades; it is reasonable to assume that they are occurring among all grades. Among 8th graders, the percent who had used a drug in the past year nearly doubled from 1991 (11% to 21 %). The increase in marijuana use in tlùs age group was particularly large with the 1995 rate for use in the last year being more than two and one-half times that found in 1991. While not as dramatic, increases have occurred for nearly all other drugs and at all ages. As we have reported before, these increases in drug .1S~ are accompanied by a corresponding decrease in the perceived harm of the risk of drug use. What's happening? No one seems to have the answer, but there is a general feeling among drug prevention professionals that there has been a lessening of concern over youth drug use in our commtmities. Those of us who have been around for a number of years can look back to the 80's and recall that there was significantly more awareness of drug abuse as a problem and more activity aimed at the reduction of drug abuse. Another hallmark of that era was a more direct involvement of families in countering drug use among their children. Could it be that as commtmities have created formalized prevention programs, parents have handed the drug abuse prevention problem over to the schools, police and other human service Agencies? Are parents now assuming that ~e problem has been taken care of because we have a new curriculum in the schools, or that the D.A.R.E. officer is looking after our children? There is no question that the formalized drug prevention efforts have great value, and that these efforts should be continued, if not expanded. On the other hand, these programs are only part of the solution and clearly cannot respond fully to the problem in the absence of family involvement. Families are the first, primary and most potent source of early socialization and are the main transmitters of values beliefs and appropriate behaviors to our young people. Without family presence, all other efforts are seriously weakened. Customers who have effectively used The American Drug and Alcohol SurveyTM have gone to great lengths to make the survey results known to the parents of their students. Sharing the survey results is a means of "personalizing" the drug abuse problem and is a great motivator for involving parents in community drug prevention efforts. The use of media is one avenue for informing parents but is often not enough. Reading the newspaper is a fairly passive activity and often does not personally engage parents in the problem or the solution. Furthermore, newspaper reports generally only apply to district wide results and it is easy for parents to attribute drug use to "those other schools, not the one my child attends." The most effective forum for relaying results is through meetings held at the school where school specific information can be presented. As most educators are aware, however, those parents who routinely attend school meetings are already strongly involved with their children's welfare. Other means must be developed for reaching all parents which may include school newsletters of information distributed at school registra tion. There needs to be a balance in how drug use rates are relayed to people. In the past, a common "flavor" that was Continued on page 7 Are parents now assuming that the problem has been taken care of because we have a new curriculum in the schools, or that the D.A.R.E. officer is looking after our children? NC7US lllld ViC7US Sprillg 1996 5 · · The American Drug and Alcohol SurveyTM database includes about 25,000 elementary school students each year and gives an opportunity to observe trends among these younger children. · Drug Use Trends Antong Elententary School Children by Ruth Edwards, Ph.D. Most of us interested in drug prevention are aware that the National Institute on Drug Abuse's Monitoring the Future study shows drug use by youth in our country has been rising since 1991 (see What's Going On? in this issue). Tlùs increase has been particularly observable among 8th graders, the youngest group included in their survey Gohnston, O'Malley & Bachman, 1995). The American Drug and Alcohol SurveyTM database includes about 25,000 elementary school students each year and gives us an opportunity to observe trends among these younger children as well. Alcohol Use. There has been no significant change over the past five years in the percentage of 4th-6th graders who report having gotten drunk at least once in their lives. The rate for 4th graders has remained at about 2%; 5th graders, 3%; and 6th graders, 5%. The dramatic jump between 6th and 8th grades is still of concern, however, with almost half of 8th graders (46%) reporting they have gotten drunk. By 12th grade this rate is up to about two out of three youth (63%) according to the Monitoring the Future study. Marijuana Use. While marijuana use rates have been rising among 8th, 10th & 12th graders, according to the Monitoring the Future Study, our data on 4th-6th graders do not show a similar increase. Among grades 4, 5 and 6, rates of marijuana use have remained fairly stable over the past five years at 1 %,2% and 3% respectively_ Tlùs is not too surprising since the average age at which older students report they first tried marijuana is about 14.5 years old (ADAS, 1995). The picture is somewhat different for cigarettes and inhalants, however. Typically these are the substances of choice for young children, no doubt partially due to their wide availability and relatively low cost. Additionally, advertising for cigarettes has been particularly appealing to young children over the past few years, and until recently, prevention programs often neglected the hazards of inhalants. Cigarette Use. While cigarette use rates have risen slightly for older youth over the past five years, cigarette use may be accelerating among 6th graders. Figure 1 shows the rates of use for 4th and 5th grade students have not changed dramatically, but in the last year there was a significant increase in the rate for 6th graders. The average age at which 12th graders report having tried cigarettes is 12.8 years- approximately 6th grade. Figure -Cigarette Use 30 --- 4th Graders -.-- 5th Graders ""- -...- 6th Graders ..... ---.... / 7' -..... "-.. .. --_..-- ~--- -or --- - 25 II 20 01 os 1j 15 ~ II c.. 10 5 o 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 Year It is important to note that over the five-year period there is more variation in the rate of cigarette use by 6th graders than among students in other grades in the same communities. Whatever the societal forces are that affect whether or not youth try cigarettes a t this early NC7VS t1lld Vic'ws Sprillg 1996 6 age, they apparently vary from year to year. Perhaps prevention efforts aimed at . tobacco use were more intense a year or two ago than they are now, or there has been a change in how the media and advertising portray smoking that is influencing this age group. We do know that the percentage'of young children who try smoking can be changed and it is important that we lower this percentage. Between twelve and thirteen years of age is when a t least half of cigarette users start smoking. The more children we can get through this age without trying cigarettes, the better the chance we have of reducing the number of youth who carry an addiction to tobacco into adulthood. Inhalant Use. Figure 2 shows a recent increase in use by 6th graders for inhalants. Inhalants are a unique class of drugs in a number of ways, and the narrow age distribution of users presents us with a good opportunity for a.,L....'ention. Use of most drugs increases WWith age. Rates for inhalants, on the other hand, increase up through age 13 and then decrease. The Monitoring the Future study shows that 21.6% of 8th graders have tried inhalants whereas the rates for 10th and 12th graders are 19% and 17.4% respectively. The difference in rates of use in the last 30 days follows the same pattern but is even more divergent. A nuinber of reasons have been given for this decrease with age. Older youth may think that inhalants are a "kiddie drug", other drugs become more available at older ages, etc. An important point is that inhalant using youth generally also have a wide range of problems, making it more likely that youth who were regular inhalant users in the 8th grade are not in school by 10th or 12th grade and thus not included in school surveys. Wha tever the reason, the primary age of vulnerability for the use of inhalants appears to be from 4th to 8th grade. If youth can be brought through this short period of time without use they may never use these harmful drugs. Figure 2-lnhalant Use 30 Prevention efforts must begin before the 6th grade to take advantage of existing protective factors and intensify when use does start to increase. Continued from page 5 given to drug use statistics was the emphasis on how many students in a given school or community were using drugs. One of the effects of this was to "normalize" drug use, giving the impression that "everyone does it." TIùs can be a harmful message to young people. More recently, some effective school based prevention programs have taken the opposite approach, emphasizing how many youth are not using drugs. (In spite of the alarming increase in student drug use, the majority of all young people surveyed still has little or no drug involvement!) TIùs clearly relays the message that drug use is not normative, and that avoiding drugs is a perfectly acceptable choice. . Prevention specialists have done a tremendous job over the past few years, but they can't do it alone. Parents and the community-at-Iarge are potent prevention forces that must be involved in order to improve the quality of life for our dúldren.. 25 --- 4th Graders -N~C7VS tllld-V;-'C7VS Sprillg 1996 . 7 tI 20 DI S ~ 15 u ~ Q. 10 ........ 5th Graders -.- 6th Graders 5 o 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 Year The overall pattern that emerges when looking at drug use among elementary school youth is that their drug use is low but that there are definite signs that use starts to increase around the 6th grade. Prevention efforts must begin before the 6th grade to take advantage of existing protective factors and intensify when use does start to increase. . , · · · MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS COMMUNITY CENTER IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT ROOM, 6720 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - FEBRUARY 12,1996 -7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order February 12, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown JoAnn Johnson Lyle E. Welch Mack Garvin Mark Wood Ray Oujesky Byron Sibbet Linda Spurlock Sansoucie Staff: C.A. Sanford Randy Shiflet Larry Cunningham Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Greg Dickens Absent: Jeanette Rewis Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Secretary Attorney City Engineer City Secretary 2. INVOCATION Councilman Sibbet gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 22, 1996 APPROVED , · · · February 12, 1996 Page 2 Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve the minutes of the January 22, 1996 meeting. Motion carried 7-0. 5. PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. PARK & RECREATION BOARD MINUTES No action necessary. 6. REMOVAL OF ITEM{S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Garvin removed Item NO.8 and Councilman Wood removed Item NO.9 from the Consent Agenda. 7. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM{S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17,18, 19,20,21,22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 & 31) APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. 8. PS 95-35 - REQUEST OF OAKMONT CAPITAL GROUP FOR REPLAT OF LOT AR1, BLOCK 2, CRESTWOOD ESTATES (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND STARNES ROAD) APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve PS 95-35 subject to the dedication of a five foot wide sidewalk and utility easement along the north side that abuts Starnes Street. Motion carried 7-0. · · · February 12, 1996 Page 3 9. PS 95-47 - REQUEST OF AMERCO REAL ESTATE COMPANY FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK A, AMERCO ADDITION (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HARWOOD ROAD AND GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY) APPROVED Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to approve PS 95-47 subject to a covenant being signed for applicant to pay his share of the increase engineering costs for the traffic signalization and drive lanes required by the State. Motion carried 7-0. 10. GN 96-16 - PRESENTATION OF 1994/95 AUDITED FINANCIAL REPORT APPROVED Ms. Janice Burns, KPMG Peat Marwick, presented the 1994/95 annual financial report. Councilwoman Sansoucie moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Johnson, to accept the 1994/95 Audited Financial Report. Motion carried 7-0. Councilman Welch advised he intended to remove Item No. 23 from the Consent Agenda. Mayor Brown stated the Council would reconsider Item No. 23 at that point on the Agenda. *11. GN 96-17 - REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF PERMIT FOR USE OF GREEN VALLEY RACE TRACK APPROVED *12. GN 96-18 - SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER GRANT RESOLUTION NO. 96-12 APPROVED · · · February 12,1996 Page 4 *13. GN 96-19 - CONTRACT RENEWAL FOR MOWING OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY APPROVED 14. GN 96-20 - NAMING OF PARK FACILITIES RESOLUTION NO. 96-14 REFERRED BACK TO PARKS BOARD City Manager Sanford presented the proposed names recommended by the Park Board for Council consideration. Councilman Garvin moved to name the park west of Hwy. 26 at NR~O, "NRH20 Community Park". Councilman Sibbet seconded the motion. Councilman Oujesky asked Councilman Garvin if he would consider naming it NRH Park as opposed to NRH20. After discussion by Council on the two proposed names, consensus of the Council was to refer it back to the Parks Board for their recommendation on the two names proposed by Council. *15. GN 96-21 - AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND BIRDVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT PROVIDING GENERAL TERMS FOR JOINT ELECTION RESOLUTION NO. 96-11 APPROVED *16. GN 96-22 - CALLING CITY COUNCIL ELECTION RESOLUTION NO. 96-13 APPROVED February 12, 1996 Page 5 · *17. GN 96-23 - AMENDMENT OF THE 1995/96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET AND AMENDMENT OF TOTAL PROJECT BUDGETS APPROVED IN 1994 BOND ELECTION APPROVED *18. PU 96-11 - AWARD BID FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC HAZARD WARNING SYSTEM APPROVED *19. PU 96-12 - AWARD BID FOR VIDEO EQUIPMENT APPROVED · *20. PU 96-13 - AWARD BID FOR TWO TRACTORS APPROVED *21. PU 96-14 - AWARD BID FOR TRENCH BOXES APPROVED *22. PU 96-15 - AWARD BID FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM EQUIPMENT APPROVED 23. PU 96-16 - AWARD BID FOR BISD/CITY JOINT TENNIS CENTER FACILITY APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to reconsider Item No. · 23, PU 96-16 and remove it from the Consent Agenda. . . e February 12, 1996 Page 6 Motion carried 7-0. Mr. Charles Scoma, B.I.S.D. Trustee, appeared before the Council. In response to Council's questions, Mr. Scoma advised that the School Board had reviewed the plans and the plans were acceptable to the School Board. Councilman Welch moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve PU 96-16. Motion carried 7-0. *24. PU 96-17 - AWARD BID FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL PREEMPTION SYSTEM APPROVED *25. PW 96-08 - APPROVE 1996 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM AND APPROVE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,150,000 APPROVED *26. PW 96-09 - APPROVE ADDITIONAL STREETS FOR THE 1995/96 CITY STREET OVERLAY PROGRAM APPROVED *27. PW 96-10 - APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO.2 FOR I.H. 820 INTERCHANGE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER ADJUSTMENTS, PHASE 2 APPROVED *28. PW 96-11 - APPROVE ADDITION OF RUMFIELD ROAD TO THE 1996 STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM APPROVED · · · February 12, 1996 Page 7 *29. PW 96-12 - APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO.1 FOR HIGHTOWER DRIVE (A1) STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *30. PW 96-13 - APPROVE BUDGET FOR SANITARY SEWER ABATEMENT STUDY-BEST MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVED *31. PAY 96-04 - APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 11 , IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,975.86 TO LARRY JACKSON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. FOR WALKERS BRANCH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I APPROVED 32. CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mr. Russell Mitchell asked who determined when the Joint Tennis Center would be available for the use of the citizens and who set the rules. Staff advised the City and B.I.S.D. had negotiated and signed a Lease Construction and Joint Use Agreement. 33. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting. Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - Assistant City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections 2/26/96 Council Meeting Date: PZ 95-26 Agenda Number: Subject: Consider the request of HSM Development to rezone I racts 3, 3A3, 3A4, 3A3A, 31:i, 3A3B, and 4A 1 ; Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from AG Agriculture to a Planned Development. (Located in the 7000 block of Hightower Drive) Ordinance No. 2095 The Public Hearing on this item was closed at the January 22, 1996 meeting. Action on the item was postponed for thirty days at the request of the developer. HSM Development is the developer of an 85.55 acre tract of land located in the 7300 block of Hightower Drive, west of Little Ranch Road. The property owner is Billy Graham, who resides on the property. The property is presently zoned AG Agriculture, and the developer has submitted an application to change the zoning classification to a Planned Development with residential uses. The property is 85.55 acres in size. It encompasses an area between Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive, west of the Calloway Branch drainage channel. The property will be split into two separate areas by a drainage channel running east and west across the property. The two areas will have separate development conditions and requirements, as follows: Tract I (north of channel) 1. Lots around the perimeter of Tract I that have no alleys will be restricted to a maximum of one front entry garage per every four lots. The other three lots must provide front-swing, side or rear entry garages. 2. Typical lots with alleys will be 65' x 125' or a minimum of 8,000 square foot lots. 3. Typical lots without alleys will be 70' x 125' or a minimum of 8,500 square foot lots. 4. All houses will be restricted to a minimum of 2,000 square feet of living area. 5. All lots will have a minimum of 60 feet of width at the building line. 6. Alleys in easements as shown: 15 foot easement with 10 foot pavement. Tract II (south of channel) 1. Typical lots will be 65' x 125' or a minimum of 8,000 square foot lots. 2. All lots may have front entry access. 3. All houses will be restricted to 1,800 square feet of living area. 4. All lots will have a minimum of 60 feet of width at the front building line. The attached zoning exhibit shows a preliminary layout of streets, lots and drainage improvements. Based on the above described restrictions, the property could be subdivided into about 275 lots, resulting in a density of 3.21 dwelling units per acre. For comparison, the R-1 zoning district density is typically 2.9 units per acre, and the R-2 district is 4.0 units per acre. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available g¡~;~tin~get ----tv, -E.).ê~---k-b~ ~ Department1;ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . FInance Dlfector c~,.,o 1 r"\~ . . -- PZ 95-26, Page 2 ""-..;JIIÞ' The developer also proposes to construct masonry screening walls along this property's frontage on Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive. One lot in the development is proposed as a park, providing access to future hike and bike trails. A Preliminary Plat of the property will be submitted upon approval of the zoning change. The surrounding land areas are mostly residential in character. The area to the east is zoned R-1-S Special Single Family Residential and mostly consists of large acreage tracts. The area to the south is zoned R-3 Single Family Residential, and includes the Richfield and North Park Estates subdivisions. The area to the west is zoned C-1 Commercial and is presently vacant. The area to the north is split between several zoning districts: R-7-MF Multi-Family (vacant), R-4-D Duplex residential, and R-2-1400 Single Family Residential. Foster Village Elementary School is located immediately north of this proposed development. The Master Thoroughfare Plan indicates a proposed C2U Minor Collector street running north/south through this property. The developer's proposed layout does not include this street. The Planninq and Zoninq Commission recommended that a collector tvpe street. with a 60-foot riqht-of-wav. be required throuah this development to connect Hiahtower Drive and Chapman Drive. The Commission also required that this collector street be constructed in a curvilinear fashion. In a 1987 survey, the Institute of Transportation Engineers found that, for single family detached dwelling units, the average number of trips generated on a weekday was 10.1 trips per dwelling unit. A development of 275 lots could generate approximately 2,750 trips per day when fully developed. This property abuts Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive. The portion of Hightower Drive between Rufe Snow Drive and the Calloway Branch channel has been designated for improvement by the Capital Improvements Plan committee. The developer will be required to construct the portion of Hightower Drive adjacent to this property. Chapman Drive is already improved. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this zoning change request at its December 19, 1995 meeting and recommended approval subject to the following requirements and modifications: a collector-type street with 60-feet of right-of-way be provided through the development with a curvilinear design; more cul-de-sac lots be shown in Tract II (south); the lots in Tract II (south) be a minimum of 7,000 square feet with an average lot size of 7,700 square feet; the four access points to the hike and bike trail be shown on the preliminary plat; the front building lines be 25-feet; the rear building lines be 15-feet on lots without alleys; the rear building lines be 20-feet on lots with alleys; the side building lines be 6 feet on all lots; a 20% rear yard open space be required; and no front entry garages be allowed on the collector street. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. ORDINANCE NO. 2095 · AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ESTABLISH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER TWENTY-ONE (21); PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a zoning district change to a Planned Development; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, Planned Development District Number Twenty-One (21) be hereby established in the Case Number PZ 95-26, on the following described property: BEING a tract of land out of the William Mann Survey, Abstract No. 1010, Tarrant County, Texas, being a portion of a 37.001 acre tract of land described in a deed to Billy J. Graham and wife Ernestine Graham by deed recorded in Volume 4204, Pogo 116, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and portion of a 47.254 acre tract of land described in a deed to Billy J. Graham and wife Ernestine Graham by deed recorded in Volume 7627, Page 292, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and all of a tract of land described in a deed to Anita Hall and Michael Franklin Hall recorded in Volume 5859, Page 550, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: · BEGINNING at a point in Hightower Drive for the northwest corner of the said 37.001 acre Graham tract, being by deed call in the south line of the J. Condra Survey, Abstract No. 311 and in the north line of the said William Mann Survey, THENCE South 89 degrees 45 minutes East, 512 feet along Hightower Drive to a point for the northwest corner of a 3.0 acre tract of land described in a deed to Billy J. Graham and wife Ernestine Graham by deed recorded in Volume 4204, Page 114, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 51 minutes 25 seconds East, 208 feet along the south line of Hightower Drive to an angle point; THENCE South 89 degrees 58 minutes 42 seconds East, at 175.42 feet passing the northwest corner of said Hall Tract, at 384.13 feet passing the northeast corner of said Hall Tract and the northwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to Billy J. Graham and wife Ernestine Graham by deed recorded in Volume 7392, Page 101, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, in all 547.21 feet to a point in Hightower Drive for the northeast corner of the 1.63 acre Graham tract and the northwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to J.W. Bailey and wife, Barbara Bailey recorded in Volume 5359, Page 554 and Volume 5923, Page 321, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 03 minutes 20 seconds West, at 30.0 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod set in the south line of Hightower Drive, in all 378.88 feet to a '1I2-inch rebar rod found for the southwest corner of the said Bailey tract; · THENCE South 89 degrees 50 minutes 19 seconds East, 226.06 feet along the south line of the Bailey tract to a 1/2- inch rebar rod found for its southeast corner, THENCE North 01 degrees 41 minutes 49 seconds East, at 345.82 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod set in the south line of Hightower Drive, in all 375.82 feet to a point for the northeast corner of the Bailey tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 54 minutes 15 seconds East, 19.91 feet to a point for the northwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to Walter Charles Williamson and Debra Denae Williamson recorded in Volume 10378, Page' 1915, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 01 degrees 41 minutes 49 seconds West, at 30.0 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod set in the south line of Hightower Drive, in all 375.80 feet to a fence post for the southwest corner of the said Bailey tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds East. 151.0 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar rod found for the southeast corner of the said Bailey tract; THENCE North 02 degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds East, at 345.25 feet passing the south line of Hightower Drive, at 354.98 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod found, in all 375.25 feet to a point for the northeast corner of the Bailey tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 54 minutes 15 seconds East, 49.79 feet to a point for the northwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to Ezra E. Bland and wife, Amma Bland recorded in Volume 4777, Page 499, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 02 degrees 36 minutes 58 seconds West, at 20.27 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod found, at 30.0 feet passing the approximate south line of Hightower Drive, in all 374.50 feet to a 1/2-inch pipe found for the southwest corner of the said Bland tract; THENCE South 89 degrees 50 minutes 19 seconds East, at 311.5 feet passing the southeast corner of the Bland tract and the southwest corner of a tract of land described in a deed to A. Hubert Hawkins recorded in Volume 8903, Page 566, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, in all 544.64 feet to a 1/4-inch rebar rod found for the southeast corner of the Hawkins tract being in the west line of Morgan Meadows Addition to the City of North Richland Hills according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-13, Page 50, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 05 minutes 46 seconds East, 1568.77 feet along the east line of Morgan Meadows Addition to a 1/2-inch rebar rod found for the northeast corner of a tract of land described in a deed to Jerry R. Winters and wife Shirley G. Winters recorded in Volume 6550, Page 882, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 18 minutes 10 seconds West, 199.78 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar rod found for the northwest corner of the Winters tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 04 minutes 58 seconds East, 519.91 feet along the west line of the Winters tract to a 1/2- inch rebar rod found for the northeast corner of a tract of land described in a deed to T. Jeff Graham and wife, Vickie D. Graham recorded in Volume 7825, Page 579, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 15 minutes 54 seconds West, 300.0 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar rod set for the northwest corner of the T. Jeff Graham tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 15 minutes East, 168.03 feet along the west line of the T. Jeff Graham tract to a 1/2-inch rebar rod set in the north line of Chapman Drive for the northeast corner of a tract of land described in deed to the City of North Richland Hills recorded in Volume 8120, Page 1710, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 47 minutes West, 449.17 feet along the north line of Chapman Drive and the north line of the North Richland Hills tract to an 'X' cut in concrete found for the northwest corner of the North Richland Hills tract and the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Richfield Subdivision, an Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-169, Page 18, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 00 degrees 09 minutes 54 seconds West, 1302 feet along the east line of Block 1 of said Richfield Subdivision to a 1/2-inch rebar rod set for the northeast corner of Lot 18, Block 1; THENCE West (base bearing by deed in Vol. 4204, Page 116, D.R.T.C.Tx.). 1306.59 feet to 1/2-inch rebar rod set fo the northwest corner of Lot 27, Block 6, Richfield Subdivision, being the southeast corner of a tract of land described in a deed to HKEM#2 - Tom Ellis & Ted Pittman by deed recorded in Volume 7861, Page 915, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Ordinance No. 2095 Page 2 THENCE North 00 degrees 08 minutes West, at 1320.21 feet passing a 1/2-inch rebar rod set for the northeast corner of the said HKEM#2 tract, in all 1345.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 85.55 acres of land, more or less. . This property is located in the 7000 block of Hightower Drive, west of Little Ranch Road. 2. THA T, the development regulations for Planned Development District Number Twenty-One (21) shall be as follows: 1. Purpose: Planned Development District Number Twenty-One is intended to provide for single family detached residential dwelling units. 2. Permitted Uses: Single family detached dwelling units, community center, and park land. 3. Subdivision Design Criteria: A collector-type street with a 60-foot right-of-way shall be provided through this development, connecting Hightower Drive and Chapman Drive. The street shall be designed in a curvilinear fashion. The general layout of Tract II (south of the proposed drainage channel) shall consist of as many cul-de-sacs as feasible in order to keep the number of lots fronting on the collector street to a minimum. 4. Development Restrictions: Planned Development Number 29 shall be divided into two distinct development areas. Tract I shall be the area north of the proposed drainage channel shown on the Site Plan. Tract II shall be the area south of the proposed drainage channel shown on the Site Plan. . The following development restrictions shall apply to Tract I: A. Lot and Area Requirements Minimum Lot Area: Lots with alleys 8,000 square feet Lots without alleys 8,500 square feet Minimum Lot Width Lots with alleys 65 feet Lots without alleys 70 feet Minimum Lot Depth: 125 feet Minimum Front Building Line: 25 feet Minimum Side Building Line: 6 feet Minimum Rear Building Line: Lots with alleys 20 feet Lots without alleys 1 0 feet Minimum Dwelling Unit Size: 2,000 square feet Maximum Structure Height: 38 feet Rear Yard Open Space Area: A minimum of 20% of the total lot area shall be reserved as an open space in the rear portion of every yard. The open space shall extend from one side property line to another side property line, abutting the rear property line, and not protruding beyond the two most extreme corners of the main structure. No part of the residential building and/or dwelling unit may be constructed so as to occupy any portion of the open space rear yard. . B. Fences: As required by Article 9, Section 910, Walls and Fences, Ordinance No. 1874, as amended. Ordinance No. 2095 Page 3 C. Parking: Off-street parking space shall be provided on the lots to accommodate four cars for each dwelling unit. At least two of such spaces shall be covered; however, no supporting member of any garage, carport or other automobile storage structure shall be located within the required front building line. D. Accessory Buildings: As allowed by Article 6, Sections 600 F & G, Ordinance No. 1874, as amended. E. Garage Entry Requirements: Lots around the perimeter of Tract I that do not have alleys shall be restricted to a maximum of one front entry garage per every four lots. The remaining three lots shall have front-swing, side or rear entry garages. Lots with alleys shall be restricted to rear-entry garage access. F. Masonry Requirement: The exterior wall surface, as viewed from each primary elevation, of all permanent structures constructed in Planned Development Number 29 shall consist of at least seventy-five percent brick, stone, or if approved by the City Council, other masonry or materials of equal characteristics. For the purposes of this requirement, the exterior wall surface shall be defined as the area between the wall corners extending from the top of the foundation up to the door or window header height of the first floor, whichever is greater. The area of door and window openings shall not be included in the calculation of this requirement. The following development restrictions shall apply to Tract II: A. Lot and Area Requirements Minimum Lot Area: 7,000 square feet; however, the average lot size of all lots in Tract II shall be at least 7,700 square feet Minimum Lot Width 65 feet Minimum Lot Depth: 125 feet Minimum Front Building Line: 25 feet Minimum Side Building Line: 6 feet Minimum Rear Building Line: 1 0 feet Minimum Dwelling Unit Size: 1,800 square feet Maximum Structure Height: 38 feet Rear Yard Open Space Area: A minimum of 20% of the total lot area shall be reserved as an open space in the rear portion of every yard. The open space shall extend from one side property line to another side property line, abutting the rear property line, and not protruding beyond the two most extreme corners of the main structure. No part of the residential building and/or dwelling unit may be constructed so as to occupy any portion of the open space rear yard. B. Fences: As required by Article 9, Section 910, Walls and Fences, Ordinance No. 1874, as amended. C. Parking: Off-street parking space shall be provided on the lots to accommodate four cars for each dwelling unit. At least two of such spaces shall be covered; however, no supporting member of any garage, carport or other automobile storage structure shall be located within the required front building line. D. Accessory Buildings: As allowed by Article 6, Sections 600 F & G, Ordinance No. 1874. as amended. E. Garage Entry Requirements: All lots in Tract II may be allowed front-entry garage access. However. lots facing the collector street shall not have front entry garage access. F. Masonry Requirement: The exterior wall surface, as viewed from each primary elevation, of all permanent structures constructed in Planned Development Number 29 shall consist of at least seventy-five percent brick, stone, or if approved by the City Council, other masonry or materials of equal characteristics. For the purposes of this requirement, the exterior wall surface shall be defined as the area between the wall corners extending from the top of the foundation up to the door or window header height of the first floor, whichever is greater. The area of door and window openings shall not be included in the calculation of this requirement. 5. Alleys: All alleys shall be constructed within a 15-foot easement located at the rear of the lots. The alley shall consist of 10-feet of pavement constructed to street standards as required by the Public Works Design Manual. Ordinance No. 2095 Page 4 6. Hike and Bike Trail Access: Four access points to the proposed hike and bike trail along Calloway Branch shall be shown on the preliminary and final plats. . 3. THAT, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein. 4. THAT, all the regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance Number 1874, as amended, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Planned Development District Number Twenty-Nine (29), shall remain in effect regarding this property. 5. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. . SA VINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shaff remain in fuff force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. 6. 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shaff be in full force from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 19th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1995. afi¿" 13/1 ..f / #¡:~'.' .;,'';/. ~ , . ? ('... ~ ",t ,Øt. E/. u /< ~-:-"; ..//--. "-~ . Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission ~-~, c . . , 0\-:-:-:" ------~.~ , ~·~=Li Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission . PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 8th DAY OF JANUARY 1996. Ordinance No. 2095 Page 5 Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texê ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Ordinance No. 2095 Page 6 _.~-=-_-"J -~_ '::"~ _ _ __=_.1 L=_ _ _ _ ~l_ L r c.. 4 -=> _'......... _ Î ~"s~~NI ï\ :.{.~-~....~ l..---- -'.' T~I- r- -- . ~ ~ ~I rlV I -;-1 - I ~ I - ~. ~~ 'f ~ i 1 . : " " ../' -..:.: -i~ \ r I ' ;.- ~ I - ìK2 I,'LJ~I ~ I -/-:+ :-I-::-~N ~~ f r+ '\-k _':l_~J \ \)J L;.1:-:~k_~~L:.I_f-- - I .. w~.n'·,tr..~ 'rd", c....: ~e.:~ · · · ,I· I' · r'",- -'I'; ·I:V K t(~J!...{( ~ ~1I " -J " " \ \ ti~ f : z ,-~:>"'r.:....:.- ~r- 1-_ -, f- ,r-- ,- ~~_">. I} 1_ _ ; I ! - =;' """- \ 1'" " - I -" - _ 1_ [ --, '1"':1 : \ ~ \ 1..._ "! - ;-.J , ~ . -:....-''-'' _ _ _ . ~ ~ .' I ': _ ,__ =--_ · -:.-: n~ 'L _n I--t"= '~_- --...,,,,.:::- __ __ _ '\ .-,,, n ,) I f7.. I ..' ~~(~':~; -; l.~ ~ \ ~ -;: I J - ~~-:::'~:.;J-- -~\~ ß~;:;L¡ - 1 . ( ~...: ~ '- -i'\..: '~--.J '". ::-..L):----L~J ~I~ "- ~~Jji-l ~I " I '[ ~ lL:-:',r ~ .......... : ~I I- - -1-\ I-- t-"T'-.> '.---- I-I=-. r~ ~II/" I .. ': ~ ~ ~_l ~ I::..~\ "_.11; .: ~ - - . ~--~ :¡r--...lL:-,\--G~:r--t = ~ ~h -- - n, 1-1:-- -- -T--1r:r 1 - -- - -. - ~ '-T~T~i::::' ~.I . - · ~ \ \ \. · I. · .,~ - - · = - ; . I --- p-k = I ~ I ~ r I -C- .... [ oft; -I- - -+-\-+- -t.-':;:r , ~~ """ ~ \x"'1 t "-'''- '"""'----- /' 77 =1 . ~I~ r UT" "~f" \ \ \ " \\ '" TTTì-! ....; 11_/ M ~ . -lY . ;11"+-: ¡ ~. Itl ¡ ¡ I ¡I· /,<r'-'" -.,. -, ~lk I:: I I 1\11 q-4 rr-__~~ l r:t-~-+-3:l -. /" 1 r "-1'/ II · · I I I - - I I I_ =,_ ~ a :1~~J8~~~: -; ( ? - ---<r f/¥!//\\ - ~ / ;-: " _,'\"~:""" l f //: \" J.. · ':1 II . /r;- , -j I· 1 '--, I ì/~ ':1.71' Wi ~ = : ,21: = 2 ~ a l' -~(.-,,-.~ I = . I I..~ r, r - I \. = .,..... IV '", . - l í'¡ T - '-.. I 1. : I _ = ;- ~,- T Po. -lL: _...:..J . ~ - - . -I r -r..;;:· l ! -:.........., _ J ~ c .~Ù' I ~ ~y~;...v '//~ 111l ~E~ II) [I - t:..~· .~::.} ,~_~~.)J. fILL ¡¡ - - - - -*-l r "'=--;- ¡¡ ¡~ ¡~ ~ '/:\ I f ~ J i ~ I '-1 f>'- i i J 1 J i. I ;:h !~'l'i'~ihJ ! if i I i J if' I l I - B :r I j!i .... I .~':$~ . I ~~~ ~ I ~~pp~~ ~ , I 10&" - Hf&:rWi - n:u }If'~h:i[h r~r'l ~I r~t.~íj1 it!!: ~i'Utml! "~ir J ..'rr~H '¡h~ ~[:¡;~!fi ¡ .1· .!.I~~.tr &~ i &~' !jl .i J .§ (t !I: [f1 .: ~[, II[ '1 tI: 11 fI 1¡!{ ¡ I' I ~epartment: W!>ubject: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Inspections ~ Council Meeting Date: 2/26/96 Public Hearinq to Consider the request of Charles Bradley to rezone Tract 4B3, Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from AG Agriculture to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential. (Located at 7104 Douglas Lane) Agenda Number: PZ 96-01 Ordinance Number 2102 Mr. Charles Bradley is the owner of a 4.201 acre tract of land located at 7104 Douglas Lane, between Hightower Drive and Starnes Road. Mr. Bradley has submitted a Preliminary Plat to divide the property into two lots, one of which he intends to sell to a prospective owner for a new home site. During the review of the Preliminary Plat, Mr. Bradley was advised by the Planning and Zoning Commission to submit a zoning change application on the property as required by the zoning regulations of the City of North Richland Hills. The property is currently zoned AG Agriculture. . Mr. Bradley has submitted a request to change the zoning to R-1-S, Special Single Family Residential. The R-1-S zoning district requires a minimum lot size of one acre and a minimum dwelling unit size of 2,000 square feet. This zoning district also gives the owner certain agricultural privileges such as horses, livestock and a masonry exemption on accessory buildings. The actual number and types of animals allowed is covered in the Animal Control Ordinance. The properties to the north, south and east of this site are zoned AG Agriculture. The property to the west across Douglas Lane is zoned R-1-S. Most of the property in this area is divided into large acreage tracts with single family residences. The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a Public Hearing and considered this zoning change request at its February 8, 1996 meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION: It recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds . Operating Budget Other b . ~ De~ Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Dlfector P::anø 1 /'"If · · · ORDINANCE NO. 2102 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2, SECTION 200, OF ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, PASSED, APPROVED AN ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 22 1993; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a change in zoning district boundaries; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RIOHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, on Case Number PZ 96-01, the following described property shall be rezoned from AG Agriculture to R-1-S, Special Single Family Residential: Being a tract of land of the John Condra Survey, Abstract No. 311, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at 1/2" iron rod found for corner in the East R.O.W. line of Douglas Lane and said point being 1301.7 feet west and 611.80 feet north of the southeast corner of said J. Condra Survey, said point being Texas NAD83 Coordinates: 7.04.249.7929,2.359.931.0727; THENCE South 88 degrees 20 minutes 43 seconds east a distance of 627.53 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 00 minutes 26 seconds west, a distance fo 278.76' to a 1/2" iron pin found for corner; THENCE, South 89 degrees, 11 minutes west a distance of 624.90 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for a corner in the East line of said Douglas Lane; THENCE North 00 degrees 20 minutes 28 seconds west along said east line of Douglas Lane a distance of 305.80 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 4.201 acres of land. This property is located at 7104 Douglas Lane. 2. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutiona~ty shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 3. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hiffs, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1996. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 26th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1996. Mayor, City of North Richland Hiffs, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hiffs, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City . CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL . Zoning Cases 1. PZ 96-01 PRESENT Chairman Members PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS FEBRUARY 8, 1996 - 7:30 p.m. The meeting was called to order by Chairman David Barfiel Planning Directo Planner Plans Ex Assis David Barfield Richard Davi Ron Luec Don n s Owen Spicer Barry LeBaron Clayton Husband Gregory Arrington Randy Shiflet Victor Baxter Paul Miller NUTES Mr. Owen stated that he took the oath of office at the January 11, 1996, and the current minutes show the same. He stated this should be corrected. Mr. Owen made the motion to approve the minutes as corrected. The motion was seconded Public Hearing to consider the request of Charles Bradley to rezone Tract 4B3, Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from AG Agriculture to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential. (Located at 7104 Douglas Lane) Mr. LeBaron stated the owner has applied for a zoning change as required by the Commission upon approval of the Preliminary Plat. He stated the owner is seeking a change to R-1-S. Chairman Barfield opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to come forward at this time. Mr. Ernest Hedgcoth, P.E., engineer for the owner, came forward to speak. He stated the owner is requesting a R-1-S zoning designation. He stated the two lots will exceed the minimum requirements of the district. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 96-01. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck. The motion carried 6-0. Addition, from R-1 Single Family Residential to C-1 Commercial. Drive) IC earing and called for those wishing to speak to come Zoning Case Review Fact Sheet Case No. PZ 96-01 PUBLIC HEARING DATES: Planning and Zoning Commission: February 8, 1996 City Council: February 22, 1996 REQUEST: AG Agriculture to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential APPLICANT: Charles Bradley, Fort Worth TX PROPERTY OWNER: Same SIZE AND LOCATION: Approximately 4.201 acres located at 7104 Douglas Lane, north of Hightower Drive. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Existing house and accessory buildings. Some trees. A pond is located at the southeast corner of the property. PROPOSED USE: Single family residences ALLOWED USE: Single family residences with agricultural privileges such as horses and livestock. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES North South East West AG: existing single family residences AG: existing single family residences AG: existing single family residences R-1-S: existing single family residences DRAINAGE Flood Insurance Rate Maps indicate that the east portion of the property lies within both the 1 DO-year and SOD-year flood plains. THOROUGHFARE PLAN Primary access to this property is from Douglas Lane, classified as a C2U Minor Collector (60 foot right-of-way, 2 lanes, undivided roadway). LAND USE MASTER PLAN The Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan calls for low density single family development in this area. This request is consistent with the plan. ZONING HISTORY This property was initially zoned AG Agriculture in 1967. No zoning change requests have been submitted on this property. PLATTING HISTORY This property is currently unplatted. The developer has submitted a Final Plat of this property for consideration at a future date. The Commission approved the Preliminary Plat of this property at its January 11, 1996 meeting. ---.. ~ :~ ! 6 / ~ .~ ; { \~ .._~~ ,-, l . \ ! 0 0 ~ ¡ 1 I ..... .......'!'.. It r ,. I .. J t3. .. to' I . t A" C I I III I 0 J." C. .. \, :I r - ,.- -. ( MATCH L/~E - SEE Crid 78-"0 Page' B' ) - ' '\-", .. .', .' 2 - : ~: ~I - !~- &00".. ¡ ·%'t\-=:·~ ~ __ _. _____________<Ø.-I:+_ .... . r, : ':z:: ' =-::~ ~ 111 ~ ~ : ~ : ¡ -~ " \~ ~ ~c£~_>~'IU~ - ~ ; ;~' , ' i ~ 2 ;; ; ~;IIC ~CC~ 'i. ...0 I CfoIJ"¡ 0 2 ;; >;; " ;:: ~ 2 C)~ - I 0, .,.~ -'" ~ .-- ,'. I . 2 . . , 2 ,. n . r n - ~ ~ 2 ~ ~-~ ,C» .. .. .: c:. t . .c", ..II c»' .coO "':.,. . ...... , w'" '" ! ~ ~;, ! «. : . . '. ..... ~ ~ . - ~ S4 ~ .." "'. 0-... W -> ~ þ ~o í~ .. "'C .. c.n ~ ~ ~ ¿" o '% ~ \h ;.; . ~ ;; ª ;; '. ;; . ., I!I ~fI . I ;; 1 ~ 1 ~ I ;; . : \ õ e ~~·I ~I ~ I ~j . \ ~ \ w\ '~: 0\ ' ,-- I 1 :::I~ :: -" - ;l-';::~¡~!~!~I·I:-I"I~¿I'""I .... ~ I. -' 110 000.-."1'11'" '..!'.. -::-h ~ : ~~ ~ ~: : ~:~ ~; I ; I : ¡ ;: ¡ ~ I ~ ~ I -I . ¡ ~ I ·"'1 :r 1'" I ,, - ~ "~;~I"'o" \ ~~~! ::: ~+!~i ¡ i I I i ~~! i I.: i ~ 'ì: : : ~ 'ì ~ ! : u-:-:)-ii I ¡ \ \ Î N\ \ \ \ \ \ \ ª - i -i -I {I· '.~.' ., ,\', '\ '\ 'hi\ '\ '\ '\ ,\ ,\¡.\ -\ J k\- L:- ~ H'GHTOWERc1~. I : ,onOAIOI. '& '6.1 ~ "I ~ i .,j wi JI" " . - ~ \.. \ ~ \ . \ . \ õ 1\: ;; \ ,;; : \; ; ~ \; ; \:" '(;i" ~ -' ~I ": "I '" . ~ I" \ 0 l- _ ~ ' :', I :: ~ '" \ i \ ~ i I ~ ; ~ v: i : _I - " ~O v\ : ¡ ,;; I ~ I :~ õ I . i· ~ ¡ ..\ ~ I· J ~ I" - ~ ~ I ~ I '" I ~ I ~ -\ ~ ;, I ~ 11\0 OAI 01. I :-:'"~ '" ~ . ~ ¡" ~ :: \ . ::, . I· -o~ '" . '" " - ~ G " - : ; \ ; ~ ~: MY ' _\_1\- :1-1- _1- -. :~ ~ w ........, ;; 0 - .. .... .. ;:: ..... .. o~. .. C"'): :;--~ - .. . \ _ "':) -; _ ~ ~ ¡ f--- I Ct~'uty 01. C""'UI., D.. ~ -;; ~ ~ ~+ ; -:- ; I v: : ¡ ,;; I ~ I : ¡ õ \. j . I ~ \" i ~ I· I'" F I - - . ----' ~ ~ . '---=-- > I ~+~~-,. . T¡~~ ¡e--:- ..' ~'i'l I I ¡Ii I i I I I '- ~;8T ç ~ ~: ;: p~, EEffiHffi >---.J' ~ ,0 õ I o UIAIOAII 01. '(: r-- ~ -: õ ¡ .¡ "I ~¡ .. \ \.. i ~ \ . \ '" \ "\ - ~: : L ë ! I ; m µ>~.~.L:,^, :v :~ ~ .3= ~¡!! ; Cm- ~ .=I~( "r-- N\\I' ! ~\~"'::)"\. ;;. '" .' ......,.:' -J~, _.... '"' ,.., c:: - ;; € :::1 - _ ,.. ~ z :: I:~ .!2~: ~ c t .4 x .~~ o 0 ·'-0 "; 0 --<"I , :-:.... . -I " I'" I ·1 ~ i . ¡" . I -I 110 OAI ST, _ ~ I '" . " .. ") " ~ I "I " ~ . -.. .! +./' ~ IIOCIWAV AVI. - " '" I· " .. ::: :: ::1::: ': ~, "Mil UM 01, ""+.:r -:- I ~ õ _w,".~~ : I ::: I :: 1 ::: I ::: ': I :: I :: , ~, I , ~ OAI tlOC[ 01, I ~-~, - ~ 91 ~ ' I - I ;: I ~ ! : I õ i -I . J r I( - I : " ~ -, ~.. h . I ~...... ~ > :;r:J Z m V> ¡~i¡ ~ ;; ¡I;; ::> '" ¡ . I ;1 ;;:~:;;¡C); I i ;;, ;5! - \ ~ i ;; I .. L \>:1-'¿ ~ I ~~ " '~s. .... \ ~"-1... ~ 0 t?- I"- ~ :.l w I ~ ~ ç~ ~ 0 CIo7:JO !"o z. ~ f-- § í ~ II ~~ i ~. ::r ::: Ž I ~ ""I;::! ': ::: . " '--- ~ ,~ AI11VA I:>' ! :;r:J . - \ ~ \ '" \ . \ '" \" \" . \ ,. \ ;; ..." VI. "'N .0 '" ~ I , :II' I N . '" ... ¡ - ~ - ;; Iõ ;~¡ :\ ;\ ;;\ :i;¿ .\ :J'. ACTS CT. ~.. . ' -= VI -I ,,~~ .Ii "'I 1: ~ '- , ~ , I ~ 'b ¡ o~ '\ ¡~: ~ ~ ;: - õ I ., .'\ ,," : ~ '"~ ~ '.-:.... :è( : ~ I'''CIWOOO ~~)' õ ~'8: -..:. . \ I ""-" ô-- ~'- . "I'"\·I"--=-~~- -i-i-I+·~!±= 'IACHTlI!;~ - ~~~ = ~¡::I::I;::I ,:¡-"~'/j?~- r--- - . f--- " I-- w I-- ,.- '" .. > -: .. :E -~ --=- ;: .. . .;J ""-:î :r:, ..J " ~ '" CITY OF NORTH RIC"L..ANC> ""\ l$ ,APPLICATION FOR A ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE no, ~I C lOOP I>2Q ,"OflTH RICHL..ANO "'u.~, TEXA:; Ploaso print all rtl~onse'S ¡OIDG ~H-~6\-""'~ PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMA TION NAMf OF APPliCANT / AGENT: C hor/t7s 13~¿) 01;;(-1 1--~-rf1t:CT ADDF1E 53 OF APPUCANT: J tf/b Pre? d~ r&f Covr ¡.. E'Q S ¡.. or rI:1TATC IZIP OF APPtICJWT: 1 TElE(;/ ;jG£~;~~g PI Jr,./o r IA ~ W/J 7C./ Ô 8 PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATlON ''''!.IE: or PROI*I::f1 T YO.."", A: ::; ,-? .-"""> C7 ___I' f- A r-",/' C'4n I :JrIUiET Al)DRESS OF' PP.OPfiATY OWNEff CITY ISTATE IZIP OF PROPlf.fiT yo-me:f/. TELJ:PHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER: lea..o.l DESCP./PTlON OF PROPERTY W><EJ¡E ZONING DISTRICT r;;HA.NCE IS lÆlNO REOUE,SHiO' TDCf4~ Í\- ~\\ ~~.k 5"'1 , $rR£t:T ~s A r LOÇ" nON WHERE ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE IS BEING REOUESTED' PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST CL AneNT lONlNG: I PAOPOOEO/ONING- P1OPOSEO US!! OF PRoPER' r ~G- -R- -s S;",<7 / C Po......"I.~ Æ?CSldr '-11::<:' ./ / IU:~ON FOf CJoANClE: 7ò CI //ov../ ('" ð "., sf n /f' ¡. / t) ,.., c:>,c 5/t")~/c. ./;;, ~I ¡" 'C·S'I c!(''rl¿c., J I - SLn\o'f:"r C"{ AlAPArTACHEO AS FiEOI.J'RED BY TH'3 FORM_ ArT"'CH AFFIOA...T FROI.IPRClPE'i7Y D.VNER II' APPUC"NT;5 NOr t;)WN¡;P.. Œ.cô.. Y E:1 c::::J NO CJ YES OÓ NO It/A I ; Jeroby COrfU): that tho [!bove Information is correct to the bost of my knowlodga, DArE: !/II/<¡ç. . ~ Your Name (printed) (J),p,../t:"! !3,..a d I,. (..1 Slgnaturo (7 ~ _ I {,.,r- ¡?r1.,:¡.<·'¿6.-'1/"" - PART 4. OfFICE USE ONL Y !' 4: ;"VU(..('; H(AJIIIN(i DATE': 7AXESP",01 G;4:;C N'JI.lOEA' CJ t'~S c:J NO CITY COUNCl~ HEAR/NO OA TtZ, l"N!lPoOJQ1 D Yl!s c::J NO FEE ~OO. 00 '-- ~ONlNG DtS7R1CT CHANGE APROII£D: ASSESSMt!NTS PAID' CJ VG,¡ CJ NO Oft t) NO, DYES DNo TI1/.~/on ..fI""IH f<:'--'1«l fo<pubIIc '-ring....... n. ~",.oon 9111'l/lA TlONS: f_I._....s - - ZONING DtSTRICT CHANGE p~ , cJ 2 CD·Q44 \1·94¡ 12/29/95' 13:03 TX/RX NO.2340 P.004 . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS O t Planning and Inspections epar ment: . C ·1 M . 0 2/26/96 _ ouncl eetmg ate: ._ ubject: Public Hearinq to consider the request of Teresa Trusty to rezone Lot 1, Block D, Richland Oaks Addition, from R-1 Single Family Residential to C-1 Commercial. (Located at 4801 Strummer Drive) Agenda Numbg.;z: 96-02 Ordinance Number 2105 Ms. Teresa Trusty is the owner of a house located at 4801 Strummer. Ms. Trusty has submitted an application to change the zoning on the property from R-1 Single Family Residential to C-1 Commercial. The owner proposes to operate a Children's Tea Room and Wedding Chapel at this location. The lot in question is approximately 200 feet wide and 150 feet deep, occupying 30,000 square feet in area. There is presently a one story single family residence with a detached garage on the lot in question. There are single family residences, zoned R-1 , located to the north and west of the property. On the south and east sides are retail shopping centers, located in a C-1 zoning district. This property is located at the northwest corner of Strummer Drive and Bedford-Euless Road. Strummer Drive was recently widened to five lanes to accommodate the increase in traffic generated by the Richland Centre shopping area, located immediately east of this property. Bedford-Euless Road has been partially widened by the City, and final widening work will be done by the Texas DOT as part of the Loop 820/183 interchange project. The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a Public Hearing and considered this request at its February 8, 1996 meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION: It recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Accl. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget Other 15~ k""j?C?dI"-1 _ Depa~Tent Heaisï:nature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director P",,,o 1 f"If . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2105 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2, SECTION 200, OF ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, PASSED, APPROVED AN ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 22 1993; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SA VINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a change in zoning district boundaries; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, on Case Number PZ 96-02, the following described property shall be rezoned from R-1 Single Family Residential to C-1 Commercial: Being Lot 1, Block D, Richland Oaks Addition as shown in the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located at 4801 Strummer Drive. 2. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 3. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1996. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 26th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1996. Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for .the City . CAll TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman David Barfield at 7:30 p ROll CAll PRESENT Chairman Members David Barfield Richard Davis Ron Lueck Don Bowen Charles Owen Jill Spicer Barry LeBaron Clayton Husband Gregory Arrington Randy Shiflet Victor Baxter Paul Miller Planning Director Planner Plans Examiner Assistant City Manager ABSENT CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF JANUARY 25, 1996 Mr. Owen stated that he too minutes show the same. ath of office at the January 11, 1996, and the current ed this should be corrected. . Mr. Owen made the by Ms. Spicer. Th n to approve the minutes as corrected. The motion was seconded on carried 6-0. Zoning Cases 1. PZ 96-01 Public Hearin Abstract 31 Douglas nsider the request of Charles Bradley to rezone Tract 4B3, Condra Survey, AG Agriculture to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential. (Located at 7104 on stated the owner has applied for a zoning change as required by the Commission proval of the Preliminary Plat. He stated the owner is seeking a change to R-1-S. airman Barfield opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to come orward at this time. Mr. Ernest Hedgcoth, P.E., engineer for the owner, came forward to speak. He stated the owner is requesting a R-1-S zoning designation. He stated the two lots will exceed the minimum requirements of the district. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. . 2. PZ 96-02 Public Hearing to consider the request of Teresa Trusty to rezone Lot 1, Block 0, Richland Oaks Addition, from R-1 Single Family Residential to C-1 Commercial. (Located at 4801 Strummer Drive) Chairman Barfield opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to come forward at this time. PZ Minutes - Page 2 February 8, 1996 Mr. Jim Trusty, 4801 Strummer Drive, came forward to speak in favor of the request. He presented pictures of the property and the surrounding area. He stated that traffic is extremely busy on Strummer Drive with the development of the shopping center across the street. He stated he cannot rent the house effectively because of the location. Mr. Trusty stated a house on this corner is worthless as a residence. He stated he intends to convert the house into a wedding chapel and tea room. He stated he has a similar facility located at Eagle Mountain Lake. Mr. Owen asked how much remodeling would be done to the house. Mr. Trusty stated some exterior work and roof work would be done to give the house a more church-like appearance. He stated he has no problem constructing a masonry screening wall. Mr. Davis asked if the Commission can restrict the use of the property to this particular use and still approve a C-1 zoning classification. Mr. LeBaron stated no, that if the C-1 is approved, the owner is entitled to all the uses in allowed in the C-1 district. Ms. Mary Ann Ramsey, 4809 Eldorado Drive, came forward to speak in favor of the request. She stated she is in favor of the entire area being zoned C-1 Commercial. She stated there are numerous types of uses in the area as evidenced by the most recent DFW travel magazine. She stated that the restaurants in the area are at full capacity during the weekends. Ms. Ramsey stated the city should encourage the redevelopment of the area as a high end commercial/retail and hotel site. She stated three other residents in attendance are in favor of the request. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Lueck stated he is opposed to approving the C-1 zoning, but he is in favor of the use. Chairman Barfield stated if they open the door, they need to open it all the way. Mr. Davis stated he is in favor of the use, but has reservations about the uses allowed in the C-1 district. He stated that type of use would not be a high traffic generator like some others. Mr. LeBaron stated that the Commission could consider Local Retail district, or consider a Planned Development if they wanted to tie the property down to one particular use. Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PZ 96-02. The motion was seconded by Ms. Spicer. The motion carried 6-0. 4. PZ 96-04 for a Special Use Permit for ey, Abstract 1588. (Located at Chairman Barfield stated that sin consider them at the same . requests are very similar, the Commission wiil e on them separately. Zoning Case Review Fact Sheet Case No. PZ 96-02 .PUBLlC HEARING DATES: Planning and Zoning Commission: February 8, 1996 City Council: February 22, 1996 REQUEST: R-1 Single Family Residential to C-1 Commercial APPLICANT: Teresa Trusty, NRH TX PROPERTY OWNER: Same SIZE AND LOCATION: Approximately 30,000 square feet of land located at 4801 Strummer Drive. (NW corner of Strummer Drive and Bedford-Euless Road) SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Existing house and accessory buildings. PROPOSED USE: Children's Tea Room and Wedding Chapel ALLOWED USE: Coffee ShopfTea Room and Wedding Chapel ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES . North South East West R-1: existing single family residences (Rich land Oaks subdivision) C-1: existing retail shopping center C-1: existing retail shopping center R-1: existing single family residences (Richland Oaks subdivision) DRAINAGE Flood Insurance Rate Maps indicate that this property does not lie within both the 1 OO-year or SOO-year flood plains. THOROUGHFARE PLAN Primary access to this property is from Strummer Drive. Secondary access is from Bedford-Euless Road. LAND USE MASTER PLAN The Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan calls for low density single family development in this area. This request is not consistent with the plan. ZONING HISTORY This property was initially zoned 1F-12 Single Family in 1967. In 1984, when the zoning map and ordinance were completely revised, the designation was changed to R-1 Single Family Residential. PLA TTING HISTORY This property is currently platted as part of the Richland Oaks subdivision. . I, , U ,----,,' ~ :' .. Q .. " 0( o Q Z 0( ;; ~O '" .. L.. ~ '(:. "< < u... ¿ . l"- I ~ ? . r '" ~~ % ¿ L.. 1> 00 ~ ,\ : ~ : ~ ,.. I : I ~: :I¡ " rJ'. . " ~ ... 0 !! ~ % I I < (> , J L.. A" -<'" -~ ^"" ('jN ,0 ua;) ... ! ~ i :: I I ~ I I ~I , ~ ;:'1 ~ ì ::\ ~ " i ! .......... . \ ' \ . \ ,.0 QNv1A)M \ ~ I ~ \ ~ \ : \ ~ \ w I (I.-ad I i I I t ~ ~ .." v IHIIIO I ~i \ :! ~ >- ~ ü ,.. I U >- ::: ~ Q V Z .. ~ .. .. :> ~ :'N1 :: ¡¡ .. .. 0 z 0 at: \ -C V ~ .. i~. \! ' ,- ~ ~ :...~~,::;~:r.",!'."I.,):",:çI , .! I -y..-,...."I\~~~:¡~.. ... if.; I i I \ 0 ~ ~ g l~ ~ ,. ¡~~ :_ ~H~1;..;.O .' ,;;"~l 0 , 1'~ < ~ j ~i~ :~ :\ :r. 0 p .&' 1. 1 ';:::; ,"', - , ~ r ,crTi-: .. .. ?' I = ! , - . I IHIIIO = I h ~ i I . ;- i " Ion Ion WUIOI.II..I 1o, ..... ...J ILACKfOOT TI, ::I ...... ;; , ~ N'" ,"" u,... ... ~ <' -;.~ <'. ~. V' -1 s : ! '7~ u~ " .. ~ : ~ ;: h ;: h ;:. ~ h ;: '11 vaVAJ'" . ! .. \ _. I I i , .. 2 :: , I ! " .. , ::! :: \ I ;:i ~I' :1,\' ,\'~; I 1 - i - ¡ - \ ~ 1 "J. ONI",,04J111 ~ ! I i . I ~ \- ... ! . ! . \ 2 i: \ ~ : ~ i . \ ~ \ I - I_ I ! I 1- : ~. - J US - 3H/7 HJJ.YK ( I1J : ·6Tld HH8 ~ ¡ - ! ... ·.LO'~'''' 04.1/0" !! ..,. 7~ y,. . · 0 .. Q at: o .... o ...... .CD Y"~ o o-~ ....,L ;. -L. ~ ~ \ ~ L.. ~ -;:. ~ o "t-- :; ! '" ..,i~ Q I 0. I ø a.. .. I- e '" .. <:> Ø> '" .. '-' "" "" '" "" :t. .... ::: '-' ... ... ::. ..... ì=:~: I- ' '" /~ ~I~i= ~ ",I ~. ...... ."" , .., . r "" I " " ". I t I" , 41_ " . ~ . 0 . ~~~\ -1 ..., ; v! i ~ o ~ j :: . :: I ç j <::> ;r - . i r 9' >< i - . '" . ,APPLICATION FOR A ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE Please print all responses CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 730 1 N E LOOP 620 NORTH RICHLAND HIU,S, TEXAS 76160 617,561,5515 PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION ) pART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMA TION Lot Bloek -D I Klc..hland OG.ks Add',-t'lon , STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION WHERE ZONING DiSTRICT CHANGE IS BEING REOUESTED: Lt801 S·trumme, Dr. PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST . CLRREI'tT ZONING:. I R- I "Reslde.n-bQ HI,ASON FOR CHANG FE: Ie) 6~ ah\~ 1: lÌ ~ <; t.ab.!'l:1 h IÌ n f" Ii"') .h I J s' I n e ..c;:; / ACHED AS RFEOUlRFED BY THIS FORM.' o NO ATTACH AFFIDAVIT FROM PROPERTY OWNER IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER' CJ YES CJ NO I :ereby certify that the above information is correct to the best of my knowledge, DA TE: l..:J lÞ - c¡ ~ Signature CASE NUMDEf¡ PART4. OFFICE USE ONLY P &:; PUBUC HEAf!JING DATE: , .' .ßA:;~~~ TAXES PAlO? DYES DNO P2. c:¡~ ·ó'L CIT,r: CPUNCIL HFEARING OA TE: - LIENS PAID? DYES DNO FEE $30000 " . ';" Z ONING DiSTRICT CHANGFE APRO\ÆD: c:=f YES 0 ·NO, :,. ORD,NO, .'.. ...... ;., ,'.. ASSESSMENTS PAID? CJ YES DNO TN. application "''' not be s::hQÚJIU<J tOf puDnc neaMng unll "a appUcan<), lee Is rOCeiYOd. . 51 IPULA. TlONS, ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE Page 1 01 2 CD-044 (1"),/) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 0, t Planning and Inspections epar ment: .ubject: Public Hearinq to consider the request of Southwestern Bell Telephone for a Special Use Permit for a Telephone Switching Station on Lot 9, Block 38, Richland Terrace Addition. (Located at 7201 Maplewood Avenue) 'c ·1 M t· 0 2/26/96 _ ouncl ee mg ate: ,..". Agenda Numbg?: 96-03 Ordinance Number 2103 Southwestern Bell Telephone has applied for a Special Use Permit to allow a Telephone Switching Station on property currently owned by the City of North Richland Hills located at the northeast corner of Holiday Lane and Maplewood Avenue. Southwestern Bell proposes to purchase the property, provided they can obtain approval of a Special Use Permit for a fiber- optic switching facility. The property is presently zoned R-2 Single Family Residential, and a Special Use Permit is required for this use in the R-2 zoning district. Southwestern Bell proposes to construct a 162 square foot mini-hut at this location to accommodate an increasing number of new services and to provide fiber-optic cabling capabilities in the area. The hut will have brick exterior and a gable roof. This is an unmanned facility. A concrete drive will be constructed to provide off-street access for service vehicles. Approximately 69% of this site will be maintained in a landscaped area (see attached site plan). . The property to the north and east of this site is zoned R-2, and there are residences located on the adjacent lots. Rich/and High School is located on the west side of Holiday Lane, and Loop 820 is located south of the site. The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a Public Hearing and considered this Special Use Permit request at its February 8, 1996 meeting and recommended approval with the following stipulations: 1. A cyclone fence not be required along Maplewood Avenue. 2. A 2-3 foot berm with landscaping be provided along Maplewood Avenue. The attached Ordinance Number 2103 includes a site plan and incorporates the stipulations recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. RECOMMENDATION: It recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) . Operating Budget _ O~r ~_ b rLt ~ t'1l4par ment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ . Finance Director p",,,,,, 1 nf . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2103 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO AUTHORIZE SPECIAL USE PERMIT NUMBER TWENTY-NINE FOR A TELEPHONE SWITCHING STATION; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the following recommendation is submitted to the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by authorizing Special Use Permit Number Twenty-Nine, by changing said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, Special Use Permit Number Twenty-Nine be hereby authorized for a Telephone Switching Station as set forth in Case Number PZ 96-03 on the property described as follows: Being Lot 9, Block 38, Richland Terrace Addition, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located at 7201 Maplewood Avenue. 2. THAT, the development regulations contained in the R2 Single Family Residential zoning district of Ordinance 1874 shall govern development on said property, except where amended by this Ordinance. The regulations contained herein shall prevail over any inconsistencies with the regulations contained in Ordinance 1874. 3. THAT, the Telephone Switching Station listed in Section 1 above shall be additionally regulated with the following requirements and regulations: A. Location: The location of the building on the lot and the building footprint shall be in accordance with the Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A". B. Building floorplan: The exterior of the building shall be in accordance with the Building Layout attached as Exhibit "A". C. Fence: A cyclone fence shall not be required along Maplewood Avenue. D. A 2-3 foot berm with landscaping be provided along Maplewood Avenue. 4. THAT, all the regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance No. 1874, as amended, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Special Use Permit, shall remain in full force and effect regarding this property. 5. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1996. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1996. Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City . I-IOLlDAY LANE çg~ z:z.r= Ooo(J- <J> ;!] - (J- (ì Iff ~ In 1> -i.' ,",' lJ 111 CP ~~ ~ -I o -I 1> .... _ r U' UJ UJO¡¡;<.P o <I' '" '11 u>u>u> ~, :n ~I (j) -j ïO 111 m ,. -j m r m < ». -j 0 ,0Ul m 1111 Z III E . . X -I OOUl -i i11 ~~ p ° 111 ~ma c u> <J>" ill X ~ rno m]~ a ~1] . - 1>", i11º~ 0- =!o ~ 2 (;IZ t ;0 111 'J>E a m LJ ;¡jz m ;o~ ~g ~ :{;o oUl ::s- 00 aC -- "'~ cs- -- ...... , (j) :r ~ - J> ~ -j 1) q m r !!' m 1) Ö r ». 0 ~c:m Z 0 ::!x m (;Ir- X 1> c-u> -i -{~::! !o"' < §1]~ m !o;: . a z iI1~ " '" C m z m ° In Z ïU () -I < ïU () 1> 0 -I I ïUlJr I C ïUrcl>ïU Yr 1>)>:J:<.P- Zo Z-lmïU() 0-1 -I UJ rrr I r... -f ¡J) lJ r...ïU r...r\,'m, h \, m CP \'»::¡ïU OJ Y O()CfOZ--<ïUr~ cO-ïUD 1>0 z¡ ïU ,-Þ- D (ì (ì =<DlJm~iíp,Q"1 '<.pJ>or I' -I G\ ~ J>\>J nI0ntZ' DCP X '1 -! D 1> -;:I rr I _I <.P ..... X 1> 0 (j'I z 0'-1", -;OX ~t~ ~ri~ "' X (j; -i æ~ ~ ~(j; r a::! J> !2~ !Z ° IT1 I z m "' ~ .... E r ~2 ~ g J>: ;00 ° IfOZ r: a J> ~!.!:ru " z -<'-- (;\"IE m r "a tí z ;o~ 111 ¡<. {J~ """-- ill () m eC:m ......::!x (;\r- c:-<J> -i-i -{~- E1Ièi æ~ m VAUGHN ARCIIITECTS PLUS \~ Ecm ....::!x G\r- c-u> -{:{::! ElJ èi æ~ IT! '1 111 Z o 111 SOUTI-IWESTERN BELL TELEPI-IONE EQUIP. vAUL T SITE PREPARATION 90ØØ2 ~,,~o HweQ . Fort WorUl. Tn... 7ðl07 . 1U7/7~2-5ð.:5l MAPLEWOOD AVENUE ..I,.....~-,' 0'-'" ~",_ ,1'1 ~ ~~.../",~ 02/1::' /<=Iç., JOe , O....T!. Pl Minutes - Page 2 February 8, 1996 Strummer Drive with the development of the shopping center across the street. He s cannot rent the house effectively because of the location. Mr. Trusty stated a hous is worthless as a residence. He stated he intends to convert the house into a w tea room. He stated he has a similar facility located at Eagle Mountain Lake Mr. Owen asked how much remodeling would be done to the house Mr. Trusty stated some exterior work and roof work would be church-like appearance. He stated he has no problem con give the house a more g a masonry screening wall. Mr. Davis asked if the Commission can restrict the u approve a C-1 zoning classification. e property to this particular use and still Mr. LeBaron stated no, that if the C-1 is a the C-1 district. , the owner is entitled to all the uses in allowed in Ms. Mary Ann Ramsey, 4809 E stated she is in favor of the numerous types of uses i stated that the restaur the city should en site. She state Drive, came forward to speak in favor of the request. She rea being zoned C-1 Commercial. She stated there are rea as evidenced by the most recent DFW travel magazine. She the area are at full capacity during the weekends. Ms. Ramsey stated e the redevelopment of the area as a high end commercial/retail and hotel other residents in attendance are in favor of the request. one else wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. ck stated he is opposed to approving the C-1 zoning, but he is in favor of the use. hairman Barfield stated if they open the door, they need to open it all the way. Mr. Davis stated he is in favor of the use, but has reservations about the uses allowed in the C-1 district. He stated that type of use would not be a high traffic generator like some others. Mr. LeBaron stated that the Commission could consider Local Retail district, or consider a Planned Development if they wanted to tie the property down to one particular use. 3. PZ 96-03 Public Hearing to consider the request of Southwestern Bell Telephone for a Special Use Permit for a Telephone Switching Station on Lot 9, Block 38, Richland Terrace Addition. (Located at 7201 Maplewood Avenue) 4. PZ 96-04 Public Hearing to consider the request of Southwestern Bell Telephone for a Special Use Permit for a Telephone Switching Station on Tract 2B3A6, Van Dusen Survey, Abstract 1588. (Located at 4251 Rufe Snow Drive) Chairman Barfield stated that since these two requests are very similar, the Commission will consider them at the same time but vote on them separately. Ms. Rita Caveness, Right-of-Way Agent for Southwestern Bell, came forward to speak. She stated she represents the property at Holiday Lane and Maplewood. She stated they are purchasing the property from the City for the cost of capping a well on the property. Ms. Caveness stated the proposed building will house telephone equipment for serving this portion of the city. She stated that this building will be in place of installing three metal cabinets. She stated they are landscaping over 60% of the property. Ms. Caveness stated there will be a drive approach to allow service vehicles to park on the property rather than in the street. She stated they do not want to place a PZ Minutes - Page 3 February 8, 1996 . . . chain link fence along the street, but will do so if required. Ms. Caveness stated they will screen the adjacent residences. Chairman Barfield asked if the landscaped area will be landscaped. He asked if the building would have a residential character. Ms. Caveness stated yes. She stated the building will be a tilt-wall building with a brick veneer exterior finish. She stated that the building can have almost any exterior look to blend in with the area. She stated that the building will have heat and air conditioning, but it will be unmanned. Mr. Davis asked if the site on Rufe Snow could be constructed to look like the one on Maplewood, with brick exterior and a pitched roof. Mr. Lueck asked if the city will still own the property at Holiday lane. Ms. Caveness stated they are purchasing the entire property from the city since they will be occupying most all unusable space on the land. Mr. LeBaron stated when the city went out for bids on the property, they had no response. He stated it is a very small piece of property. Ms. Ruth Swaney, Manager-Engineering Right of Way, came forward to speak. She stated she represents the property at Rufe Snow and Tabor. She stated there is no problem in changing the exterior look of the building. Chairman Barfield stated they should ,be required to construct a fence along Rufe Snow Drive. Ms. Swaney stated they did not show a fence on Rufe Snow because there would not be enough room for service vehicles to pull off the street and open the gate. She stated that could be a dangerous situation. Mr. Marvin Daily, 6640 Tabor Street, came forward to speak in favor of the request. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Lueck stated his opposition to the use of the property at Holiday Lane. He stated he does not think that this is the highest and best use of the property. He stated the property could be used as a park. Mr. Davis stated the property is too small for any other use. He stated the well could be a liability if the city continues to own the property. He stated if someone else owns it, the city could at least get some property tax money from it. Chairman Barfield stated he would like to see a 2-3 foot berm with landscaping along the frontage of the property on Maplewood Avenue. He stated he would like to see it look more like the landscaping in front of city hall. Ms. Caveness stated that would not be a problem. She stated they chose to use trees on the property rather than bushes for maintenance purposes. Mr. Lueck stated the City Council should consider that this property be purchased for park purposes. Ms. Spicer made the motion to approve PZ 96-03 subject to the following: a cyclone fence shall not be required along Maplewood Avenue, and a 2-3 foot berm with landscaping be provided along Maplewood. The motion was seconded by Mr. Davis. The motion carried 5-1, with Chairman Barfield, Mr. Davis, Mr. Owen, Mr. Bowen and Ms. Spicer voting for, and Mr. Lueck voting against. PZ Minutes - Page 4 February 8, 1996 Chairman Barfield stated that the site on Rufe Snow will leave the trees at the rear of the property and pave most of the site for service vehicle access. Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PZ 96-04 subject to the exterior being brick and the building having a pitched roof. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck. The motion carried 6-0. 5. Consideration of a recommendation to the City Council regarding Masonry S adjacent to thoroughfares. TABLED 1/25/96 Mr. Davis stated he is opposed to allowed an exposed aggregate fi problem with the rest of the items. Mr. Lueck asked why painted brick is not allowed. Chairman Barfield stated to make it easier to remov water blasting. I from the walls by sand blasting or Mr. Arrington stated that most paint man sand or water blasting to allow graffiti rs have an additive to paint that will allow light Mr. Davis made the motion to t Section B (exposed aggregat walls. The motion was s recommendation to the City Council, subject to deleting changing the wording in Section F to not allow concrete block a by Mr. Lueck. The motion carried 6-0. STAFF REPORT None. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT no further business, the meeting was adjourned. . . . SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY REQUEST Southwestern Bell Telephone is requesting to acquire the remainder of Lot 9, Block 38 of Richland Terrace Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-14, Page 74, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, either in fee or as an easement. Southwestern Bell Telephone needs to place a Mi ni -Hut in th is area. Th is will allow Southwestern Bell Telephone to increase the number of available lines as well as bring the new technology to this area. We are in a blocked situation. We are prepared to plug the existing well on the property as a condition of purchase for the property in fee or as an easement. We are a 1 so prepared to adjust the facade to blend with the adjoining residential properties. Attached: Mini-Hut Information Sheet Roof and veneer recommendations (other than standard) Survey--based on conveyances. of record, does not show added turn 1 ane Site Plan: will have to adjust to add turn lane once information supplied by city Requesting: Adequate easement for placement of Hut and park i ng or purchase in fee for Hut and parking Variance for building lines if necessary to place Hut ~] JAr,! 12'96 10: 47Ar'l 13845 FHH BLVD F'.<-1 .... ~. . ...-~.. City Of' NORTI4 RICHLAI.O III\,\,S APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT 7301 ~e. LOOP '1\ NOI\TH IIICI/LANO HilLS, rr Pktaoo plint aU r91l~ IIHII'UC& PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION NIWE OF APPUC,AJ.¡T 'AOéNT: Southwestern Bell Telephone Company STREET A.DDRfSoS OF APPUC.4HT: Three Bell Plaza, 308 S. Akard, Room 1800 CITYIi>TATEIZJP OFAPPUQ,4NT: T EI.EPHOH£ NU¡.¡RER OF 1V'P1./Cl.NT.. Dallas, Tx. 75202 214-464-0057 PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION HoWE Qf' PROPERTr OWHER: City of North Richland Hills STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER: 7301 N. E. Loop 820 CI TY 1ST A TE I ZIP OF "ROPER rY OWNER: TELEPllOi'Il NIJJ./fJER OF PROPERTy OWHER North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 817-581-5551 LlCAI. O¡¿St;n¡PTIOH OF PROPElTrY WlIERE SPECIAl. USE PERMIT IS REiNa REQUESTED: Part of Lot 9, Block 38, Richland Terrace Addition of the City of North Richland Hills. Texas STREIT t.OORESS ÂT LDCATlOIi WH~E SPECIAl. (,1st PERMIT IS BEING REQUESTEO: 7201 Maplewood Avenue, North Richland Hills, TX 76180 PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST CIJRFlEHT lONINO CLAS&FICATlON: PROPO$EO USE Of' PROPSllrr: R-1 Telephone Equipment Hut ADDmONAI. COJ./J./£NT$: ArrACH sIre PU,N PíR SPECI"C,I,TIONS ON ¡¡EVCRS' õlOE OF THII FORJ.t ATTACH A.1F/().4.VlT FROU PROPERTY OWNER IF N>PI.ICl.NT IS NOT OWNrR cnJ YliS D NO CJ Yes c::J NO I herøby t;er/ify that Ihe foregoIng Information is correct to Ihe best of my knowledge. DATE: January 24, 1996 ¿d,*- (1.¿¡-Z~~ .;Y:J- ~ Your Name (printed) Rita Cavaness SIgnature PART 4. OFFice USE ONLY p" Z P1JfiUO HEMING DATE; rMU PAID? CASE HI/MBiR: W YES DNO f2. ~ (,g - o?::; CITY COUNCIL HE,l,RING lJA TE: LIENS PAID? D ~i~ D flO FEE $300.00 SPECI"'¡ USE PERMIT APF/OVEO: ASSESSUfNrs PAID' 0 YES D NO OlIO. NO. CJ YES DNa tN. tøp',,:_lIon ,..,~, nOI b, Khadllt4 1<1 po.~'" h..." lI'1illh. Oþp¡""" , . I.. :. 'tc.t,H. Con'*lIot1. .1 ¡lpptoval - ....-....--. - SPECIAL USE PERMIT po.... 1 .r 2 CIH14 (..9)) Zoning Case Review Fact Sheet Case No. PZ 96-03 PUBLIC HEARING DATES: Planning and Zoning Commission: February 8, 1996 City Council: February 22, 1996 . REQUEST: Special Use Permit for a Telephone Switching Station APPLICANT: Southwestern Bell Telephone, Fort Worth TX PROPERTY OWNER: City of North Richland Hills, Texas SIZE AND LOCATION: Approximately 0.153 acres (6,658 square feet) located at the northeast corner of Holiday Lane and Maplewood Avenue. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Vacant property. CURRENT ZONING: R-2 Single Family Residential PROPOSED USE: Telephone Switching Station with copper cable and fiber-optic service. ALLOWED USE: Telephone Switching Station allowed by SUP in the R-2 Single Family Residential zoning district. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES North South East West R-1: existing single family residence NE Loop 820 R-1: existing single family residence U: practice football field and track for Richland High School (future NRH Tennis Center) . DRAINAGE . Flood Insurance Rate Maps indicate that this property does not lie within both the 1 DO-year or SOD-year flood plains. THOROUGHFARE PLAN Primary access to this property is from Maplewood Avenue, classified as a C2U Minor Collector (60 foot right-of-way, 2-lanes, undivided roadway). LAND USE MASTER PLAN The Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan calls for low density single family development in this area. ZONING HISTORY This property was initially zoned 1 F-9 in 1967. In 1984, when the zoning map and ordinance were completely revised, the designation was changed to R-2 Single Family Residential. PLA TTING HISTORY This property is currently platted as part of the Richland Terrace subdivision. . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS D r1 Planning and Inspections epa ment: .ubiect: Public Hearinç¡ to consider the request of Southwestern Bell Telephone for a Special Use Permit for a Telephone Switching Station on Tract 2B3A6, Van Dusen Survey, Abstract 1588. Located at 4251 Rufe Snow Drive) ,. 2/26/96 _ Council Meeting Date: Agenda NumbtPr~ 96-04 Ordinance Number 2104 Southwestern Bell Telephone has applied for a Special Use Permit to allow a Telephone Switching Station on property located on the west side of Rufe Snow Drive, between Tabor Street and the Castlewinds apartment complex. The property is presently zoned R-2 Single Family Residential, and a Special Use Permit is required for this use in the R-2 zoning district. Southwestern Bell proposes to construct a mini-hut at this location, to accommodate an increasing number of new services and to provide fiber-optic cabling capabilities in the area,. This mini-hut is a 240 square foot and is an unmanned facility. The location for the mini-hut is at 4251 Rufe Snow Drive. The building site is a 1 ,440 square foot utility easement. A concrete drive will be constructed to provide off-street access for service vehicles (see attached site plan). There is no landscaping proposed for this site. A six-foot wood fence is proposed along the north and west property lines. A fence is not proposed along the street frontage. . The property to the north and west of this site is zoned R-2, and there are residences located to the north. Residences are located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive, and the Castlewinds apartment complex is located south of the site. The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a Public Hearing and considered this Special Use Permit request at its February 8, 1996 meeting and recommended approval with the following stipulations: 1. The building to have brick exterior finish. 2. The building to have a pitched roof. The attached Ordinance Number 2104 includes a site plan and incorporates the stipulations recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. RECOMMENDATION: It recommended that the City Council hold the required public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. , Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) . Operating Budget Other Finance Review Accl. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ . Finance Director ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM P::¡np 1 nf ORDINANCE NO. 2104 . AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO AUTHORIZE SPECIAL USE PERMIT NUMBER THIRTY FOR A TELEPHONE SWITCHING STATION; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the following recommendation is submitted to the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by authorizing Special Use Permit Number Thirty, by changing said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, Special Use Permit Number Thirty be hereby authorized for a Telephone Switching Station as set forth in Case Number PZ 96-04 on the property described as follows: Being Tract 2B3A6, Van Dusen Survey, Abstract 1588. . This property is located at 4251 Rufe Snow Drive. 2. THAT, the development regulations contained in the R2 Single Family Residential zoning district of Ordinance 1874 shall govern development on said property, except where amended by this Ordinance. The regulations contained herein shall prevail over any inconsistencies with the regulations contained in Ordinance 1874. 3. THAT, the Telephone Switching Station listed in Section 1 above shall be additionally regulated with the following requirements and regulations: A. Location: The location of the building on the lot and the building footprint shall be in accordance with the Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A". B. Building floorplan: The exterior of the building shall be in accordance with the Building Layout attached as Exhibit "N. C. Exterior of Building: The exterior of the building to be brick. D. Roof: The building to have a pitched roof. . 4. THAT, alllhe regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance No. 1874, as amended, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Special Use Permit, shall remain in full force and effect regarding this property. 5. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1996. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1996. Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City '.þ. Z .¡:,.. 0 -I (j) ~ -I -< iU iU 0 OlD G\(J\ P. 0 EE -I p. c 2~ iUDr '1ï' EJ: p.~(ì -I 00 ¡uP iU m C ]> m ::r þ. iU OJ::r-l I iH~ þ." p.m2(J\, p.iU- . 0 iï1 Z-I ~DnriU(ìiU~º ~DìllJ -to m 1) mc (ìïU~[1í::$.zr(ì~2rO r þ. D=! olT1t8iUz-tÞ.::¡O(J\p.~ m HI r COlD þ.D--<z--<-tmz- ~ -t- zO-J~ Þ.DO zOO < O-t -I~' UJ ~z z z --< ""' --< lJl1I' ¡=1T1;!; 10(J\~~ » (J\m ' þ.OD--<lT1r . C-I -I g~ Eþ. -I(J\G\ Þ. Dr iJiiUc. I 0 OJ(J\ 111 ~ rll Z ¡= ~ -t ,(J\ ~ ri) ~ ~~ ""'ID :<~ -1m -<;0 X I --<00-1 ~--<m Z 111: 11- 11- (I (I ::r þ. ~ IT1 D õ¡;¡ -n õ~ :n:n IT1 OJ''; (\ IV X 1>1: ~~ I>r Z rö rm -t » z: a (J\ II 0 "' I) m ;0 ~ m » (j) - m r m < » -I o Z M X P M ~ P ." > ríí " M Z ... '" !:¡ P M '" ç X ~ ... ~ p p "'. ... n J: > Z c: z x ;;¡ Z n '" ttJ () 3C -I ::s- m -. lJ \> - r » - . z -+- -- a ~- 40'-0' EASEMENT LINE / WOOD FENCE M > '" M " -c:1 M z M 61 ... x I~I -....15:: ç; ~ ~ .... 1:01 > 1~1 ~ 161 .., M 1 c: 1 z n ¡i!\1 M EASEMENTLmE '" .,,'" VIM ;)/ NEW CURB CU T OIS ~~ ¡¡ii'" ;¡¡ :o"i -<:::I Q MZ .,,<> gO 0 ~ ¡: ;;; > M :0 RUFE SNOW DRIVE 0 '" VAUGHN ~CIIITECTS PLUS ~~ 3$50 HweD . Fort 1I'ort..h. Tn.. 78107 . en /'732-50651 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE JOe' EQUIP. VAULT SITE PR=:PARATION '55Ø5l RUFE SNOW DRivE "'ATE, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I Ø2/12/'3b pictures of the property and the surrounding area. He stated that traffic is extremely busy 0 strummer Drive with the development of the shopping center across the street. He stated cannot rent the house effectively because of the location. Mr. Trusty stated a house on is worthless as a residence. He stated he intends to convert the house into a weddin tea room. He stated he has a similar facility located at Eagle Mountain Lake. Mr. Owen asked how much remodeling would be done to the house. Mr. Trusty stated some exterior work and roof work would be done to church-like appearance. He stated he has no problem constructin e house a more onry screening wall. Mr. Davis asked if the Commission can restrict the use of the approve a C-1 zoning classification. to this particular use and still Mr. LeBaron stated no, that if the C-1 is approved, the C-1 district. ner is entitled to all the uses in allowed in Ms. Mary Ann Ramsey, 4809 Eldorado stated she is in favor of the entire ar numerous types of uses in the a stated that the restaurants in the city should encoura site. She stated thre ame forward to speak in favor of the request. She g zoned C-1 Commercial. She stated there are videnced by the most recent DFW travel magazine. She a are at full capacity during the weekends. Ms. Ramsey stated development of the area as a high end commercial/retail and hotel esidents in attendance are in favor of the request. else wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. ed he is opposed to approving the C-1 zoning, but he is in favor of the use. an Barfield stated if they open the door, they need to open it all the way. r. Davis stated he is in favor of the use, but has reservations about the uses allowed in the C-1 district. He stated that type of use would not be a high traffic generator like some others. Mr. LeBaron stated that the Commission could consider Local Retail district, or consider a Planned Development if they wanted to tie the property down to one particular use. Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PZ 96-02. The motion was seconded by Ms. Spicer. The motion carried 6-0. Public Hearing to consider the request of Southwestern Bell Telephone for a Special Use Permit for a Telephone Switching Station on Lot 9, Bloc 4. PZ 96-04 Public Hearing to consider the request of Southwestern Bell Telephone for a Special Use Permit for a Telephone Switching Station on Tract 2B3A6, Van Dusen Survey, Abstract 1588. (Located at 4251 Rufe Snow Drive) Chairman Barfield stated that since these two requests are very similar, the Commission will consider them at the'same time but vote on them separately. Ms. Rita Caveness, Right-of-Way Agent for Southwestern Bell, came forward to speak. She stated she represents the property at Holiday Lane and Maplewood. She stated they are purchasing the property from the City for the cost of capping a well on the property. Ms. Caveness stated the proposed building will house telephone equipment for serving this portion of the city. She stated that this building will be in place of installing three metal cabinets. She stated they are landscaping over 60% of the property. Ms. Caveness stated there will be a drive approach to allow service vehicles to park on the property rather than in the street. She stated they do not want to place a PZ Minutes - Page 3 February 8, 1996 · · · chain link fence along the street, but will do so if required. Ms. Caveness stated they will screen the adjacent residences. Chairman Barfield asked if the landscaped area will be landscaped. He asked if the building would have a residential character. Ms. Caveness stated yes. She stated the building will be a tilt-wall building with a brick veneer exterior finish. She stated that the building can have almost any exterior look to blend in with the area. She stated that the building will have heat and air conditioning, but it will be unmanned. Mr. Davis asked if the site on Rufe Snow could be constructed to look like the one on Maplewood, with brick exterior and a pitched roof. Mr. Lueck asked if the city will still own the property at Holiday lane. Ms. Caveness stated they are purchasing the entire property from the city since they will be occupying most all unusable space on the land. Mr. LeBaron stated when the city went out for bids on the property, they had no response. He stated it is a very small piece of property. Ms. Ruth Swaney, Manager-Engineering Right of Way, came forward to speak. She stated she represents the property at Rufe Snow and Tabor. She stated there is no problem in changing the exterior look of the building. Chairman Barfield stated they should ,be required to construct a fence along Rufe Snow Drive. Ms. Swaney stated they did not show a fence on Rufe Snow because there would not be enough room for service vehicles to pull off the street and open the gate. She stated that could be a dangerous situation. Mr. Marvin Daily, 6640 Tabor Street, came forward to speak in favor of the request. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Lueck stated his opposition to the use of the property at Holiday Lane. He stated he does not think that this is the highest and best use of the property. He stated the property could be used as a park. Mr. Davis stated the property is too small for any other use. He stated the well could be a liability if the city continues to own the property. He stated if someone else owns it, the city could at least get some property tax money from it. Chairman Barfield stated he would like to see a 2-3 foot berm with landscaping along the frontage of the property on Maplewood Avenue. He stated he would like to see it look more like the landscaping in front of city hall. Ms. Caveness stated that would not be a problem. She stated they chose to use trees on the property rather than bushes for maintenance purposes. Mr. Lueck stated the City Council should consider that this property be purchased for park purposes. Ms. Spicer made the motion to approve PZ 96-03 subject to the following: a cyclone fence shall not be required along Maplewood Avenue, and a 2-3 foot berm with landscaping be provided along Maplewood. The motion was seconded by Mr. Davis. The motion carried 5-1, with Chairman Barfield, Mr. Davis, Mr. Owen, Mr. Bowen and Ms. Spicer voting for, and Mr. Lueck voting against. PZ Minutes - Page 4 February 8, 1996 Chairman Barfield stated that the site on Rufe Snow will leave the trees at the rear of the property arid pave most of the site for service veh ide access. Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PZ 96-04 subject to the exterior being brick and the building having a pitched roof. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck. The motion carried 6-0. 5. Consideration of a recommendation to the City Council regarding Masonry Screening adjacent to thoroughfares. TABLED 1/25/96 Mr. Davis stated he is opposed to allowed an exposed aggregate finish. problem with the rest of the items. Mr. Lueck asked why painted brick is not allowed. Chairman Barfield stated to make it easier to remove graffiti fro water blasting. Mr. Arrington stated that most paint manufacturers h sand or water blasting to allow graffiti removal. Mr. Davis made the motion to take this rec Section B (exposed aggregate), and chan walls. The motion was seconded by ation to the City Council, subject to deleting e wording in Section F to not allow concrete block ck. The motion carried 6-0. STAFF REPORT None. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT siness, the meeting was adjourned. David Barfield, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission . . I. lA"! 12 '96 10: 47AI-¡ 12845 FAA BLVD P.4 .... ~.. ~-n' PlÐaoo print aU rØ!l~ APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION N,JW;E (Y APPUCMlT I llDENT; Southwestern Bell Telephone Company c:rty OF NOfI~ R¡CHLAIC HILLS T:IOI Ii,E. LOOP .1.0 NOOTH 'I'¢HLAND HILLS. TEXA9 7et eo It H81·uað ','R, e O:,...! !"fl<::\( ',(L-,...\..<o v' 6-...(., t\ \oJ. þ."Q(. '" I STREET Å/JDI'IF~ (Y IIPPt./CAJVr: Three Bell Plaza, 308 S. Akard, Room 1800 CITY I 8TME I Z1P Of: APPIJCA.NT: Dallas, TX 75202 PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION NJ.,IJE (Y PROPERT't OWNER: IV. ~larvin Daily STREET /\DMEt..S OF PROP~Rry OWNER: 6640 Tabor Street ÇJTY I STIITE I ZIP OF PROPEArr OWNER: North Richland Hills~ Texas 76180 817-485-3729 TE/.EPHOIYI; NU~Bên OF ¡ApPLICANT: 214-464-0057 TnEPI/Ot'lE NUIoIBER OF PROPERTy «GAL or;SCf1/pr/OH (Y PROPERrr lVI/ERE SPECIAL USE Pf:RI.IIT IS B<IN<1 REOUESTED: Portion of Tract of Land, Abst1'act :\0. lS88"Warranty Deed, City of North Richland Hills, Texas ZB3ACD STREIT /\DDRESS AT LOCÄn~ WHERE SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS B<lNa REQUEST/!0: 6640 Tabor Street PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST CURRENT ~ONINO CLA/3.sJFICÄrION: R- 2 MJDlrrONÄL CO/JMENTS: ,J,TTACH 811E PUN PER SPECI'ICATIONS ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORJ.4: ~ Vlšg D NO Hut .-.TTÄCH ~F'()A.'IIT FROIJ PROPEFHy OWNëR I~ IIPPt.ICANr IS Nor OWNêFè ¡¡:¡] Yes c:J /010 I hør8by t;6rtily that the (oregolng Information is corrsct to 1119 best 01 my know/edge. DATE: January 25, 1996 Ruth Swancey Your Name (printed) PART 4. OFFICE USE ONLY p" 1 PVBUC HEI\RING DATE; Clry COUNCIL ¡tEARING DATE: SPECI.-.L USE PERIoIIT APROVED; DYES 0 NO 0110, NO, Con""""', øl ApfNOVU . :..:-=- SPECIAL USE PERMIT P,\1O , 0' 2 TME8 P,AJO, DYES CASE NUMBER: DNO llEHS P,AJO' D Y€~ FEE $300.00 DNO ASSESSJ.4ElIrS PAlO? CJ YES DNO 'tN. "'p'ic.~", ..41 no, bo .ch.d.,"d let þUbf~ h'."'g ",,¡Ich. O)p'c,~on I.. i. r.c.ó.td. . ------- CIHI4 (~·UI """ In I tD I' C!J en 0 .... - .... C\J .... (T) .... OOPp ;,., - .... .." 0 .... 121 en nl C!J '" . '" I' R' tD I"Z' I!') <q '" . (T) I"Z' C\J ;; ." .... ... '!f1pp "" .... .... ;; M 0 ;; .... "" 0 C\J en ... 7~ .. / ;. r3 .. :.; I ß" / en/ ;& . , - 1 N tp N cn N Of(',./. / / CT1 Nì "tJOì.:J C\J C!J C\J C!J I I f / ,'J' (T) <q C\J I' C\J .... C\J (T) <q U; '" I' 7 ) 1.0 I!') / .. I " C\J tD I ~ C\J //I~ tD I' 1.0 \.'"1 " CT1 0 I!') I!') .... .... - .... .... IT C\J C\J I!') IT 1.0 a: / tJO '!fWtJ'!fJ 0 0 I' CO C\J <q C\J <q « w l- I' ~ (T) C\J (T) H C!J <q I!') 1.0 I' C!J ~ C\J (T) C\J r In r en ~ .....,C\J C\J I / ~ en C!J ,..... :.c a: 0 ... .... - I!') en 0 - .... I 0 0 C\J « " .... " ... ¡ , .... \¡:) I ~ I : U(/¿';tJo MONS 3 ntJ - - - - - - - I ;'J CD In N cn '<:r l !) C\J 0 .... (T) C\J - ... C\J C\J C\J ... .... C\J CT1 ... 0 C\J " ... en ... I!') C!J ... ... 0 1.0 I' <:> .... .... " ~ - - ~f .(1 «, .... C\J .... . . ... ~ 0< "' ;; 0 . (T) .... '" .... R' R' o .... ,.. <:>þ 0<;. ~ .... ~. .... :: {?~~ I"ZI Jæ~~ 7 ~~~ ,;; en ' ; <q a: .... en ;; f'""""C ! ..~ "". ~ C!J ' I!') ~ a: a C!J ~ ... ~.~ ~ r-- r-- - f' '" tn - - '" UJ ~c; . ~iI e: 1.0 I!') ~ ~ . ~C!. ~ ~\ (T) a e: ¡jjCIV I!') ~ ~ ~ rv <q <q e: ;(;CIV a ¡ "<I' r-r\ )-- <q '" (T) ¡ 0 e: ;(;CIV . C\J I.-J (T) .od <q a C\J a ... a .... e: ;(;CIV C\J -- C\J . ... : C\J . (T) . C\J . e: ~CIV <>', ..' .... I I <:> <Z' I. <Z' L e: (T) <:> ~CIV 10 :: .... C\J ¡ .... IQ .... ... CD ... ~ Ò "'IIi '1 (T) .-1.f2 1- C!J - a: (T)U e: I'U :: :: - :: .0 C\J< 0 C\J< <0' <>', ..... ....... C'I e: C!J C'I I- - CJ) *- 0 l- e: >- CJ) W r-- ~ - C!J -1 IT ~ ., , , I I J I I I , I I I I I I I' , I I I I ,- - - - - - - I ,.-----..... I ( , } II \\ , ' II " II " 'L " Z , , Z I I -.rl ... ',', \.Ù II ,I. ~ _ ,\ . II! f't"'\Z I '------, II ~o ,- -8- - -.... .... ~I 0,1 II~,O II <1. I' II ~a:.4 I I I (:ù 0 II to (0 I ~ Z I} 0 \0 I I ,- - - --,. - ~ - - -' ~ I r----H" ~ ---...., ~ II -:> I ~-z.. . . \ . -,.....,. 1\ \ \ \' ~\ .~ ...___\r.H-"j_~...c...~ID-_ \ I ~ -~ /,..-:;-~~- r~~-, II to // -z.."'-- ..,.-'I I: <1. /// <tS' I, ü ((/ ~ >.m<t I L.. 1 I ~-c:- r" ..-;.- II I I I I I II I I II I I <',...-ilt--" II II ,'> /. --- I"" " J \.., /./ ......L.___..L.__~ '-_..L.____-' ./ '-... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -' .. o '" «CIV <q CD 1.0 C\JIO e:_ t- "'¡--... .'" -.rl = <: c; ('. c p- ~ i C\J - \\ ---.. ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 2/26/96 Approve Speed Zone Change on I.H. 820 and S.H. 121 - Subject: Orr:lin;:mr.p. No ?100 Agenda Number: GN 96-24 Based on recent engineering and traffic investigations conducted by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), they are requesting the City raise the speed limit to 60 mph on I.H. 820 and S. H. 121. The current speed limit is 55 mph. The cities of Hurst and Haltom City have also been requested to change the speed limit on the portion of I.H. 820 and S.H. 121 that are located within their cities. Staff reviewed the proposal with the City Manager's office and the Police Department and they are in agreement with TxDOT's proposal. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve Ordinance No. 2100. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ o e Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Sign ture CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director Page 1 of . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2100 AN ORDINANCE ALTERING THE PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ESTABLISHED FOR VEHICLES UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 167 AND 169 OF ARTICLE XIX, RC.S. 6701d, UNIFORM ACT REGULATING TRAFFIC ON HIGHWAYS, UPON THE BASIS OF AN ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION UPON I.H. 820 and S.H. 121, WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AS SET OUT IN THE ORDINANCE: AND PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $200.00 FOR VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, Section 167 and 169 of Article XIX, RC.S. 6701d, Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on Highways, provides that whenever the governing body of the City shall determine upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that any prima facie speed therein set forth is greater or less than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist at any intersection or other place or upon any part of a street or highway, with the City taking into consideration the width and condition of the pavement and other circumstances on such portion of said street or highway, as well as the usual traffic thereon, said governing body may determine and declare a reasonable and safe prima facie speed limit thereat or thereon by passage of an ordinance, which shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected at such intersection or other place or part of the street or highway, now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: Section 1. Upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation heretofore made as authorized by the provisions of Section 167 and 169 of Article XIX, R C. S. 6701 d, Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on Highways the fOllowing prima facie speed limits hereafter indicated for vehicles are hereby determined and declared to be reasonable and safe; and such speed limits are hereby fixed at the rate of speed indicated for vehicles traveling upon the named streets and highways, or parts thereof, described as follows: Control Section 8-14; tH. 820 From the west City limits at Mile Point 21.502 east 2.464 miles to Mile Point 23.966, zoned at 60 miles per hour. Control Section 8-13; tH. 820 From Mile Point 23.966 east 0.341 mile to City limits at Mile Point 24.307, zoned at 60 miles per hour. Control Section 364-01; S.H. 121 From City limits at Mile Point 20.206 east 0.412 mile to City limits at Mile Point 19.794, zoned at 60 miles per hour. . . . , Ordinance No. 2100 Page 2 Ordinance No. 722 regulating prima facie speed limits for I.H. 820 and S.H. 121 be amended to reflect this change. Section 2. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in any sum not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00). This ordinance supersedes all previous ordinances pertaining to the portion of the referenced highway described above. PASSED AND APPROVED, this 26th day of February, 1996. APPROVED: Mayor Tommy Brown ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, Assistant City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City - ~ ì ~ "< () ~ , N7 ~:~ // .J>' <c-" , '""- / :~, / "1"... ~ .-/ .~~\./ .¡.', L .~--~~~ ~ ~.;>~ (j) ~ ~~ ~ ~\/ \ ~ ' ::: \ ~ ~ S 1\1-: : \ ~.:) ~)~/¡ \1 J ~'777"~""~~~ °1 '10 'S i¿J ;__1 ,c~~ PI, ç.'_' "I' ¡-¡ '-- ~. n;; - ;-~- ~,' ! ~\i /'~ " ¡-- ~ \~! _-,~ r- :-..~_ "\ ..~.- ' , ' _ __. ~-t"----- _ ~ , _, _ _" _~____ ---J I - .~ ' ,.~....- p ~ f I r4 , II ~. -s ,,~. ... .. -- --..1 :z: S"'>;¡ , .~< . ..--- . . ~ ¿ ¿ [' H'.3 - .C." r- ¿ ¿ [; ,,"O.LN30 ~ " " CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Approve "No Parking at Anytime" Zone on the North Side Subject: 7300 Chapman Rnad P.Rst tn 7~1? ChRrmRn Rnad _ Agenda Number: Ordinance No. 2101 2/26/96 GN 96-25 Staff has received a request from Classic Concepts, the builder and developer of Brittany Park Estates, to place no parking signs along a section of Chapman Road at Brittany Park Court. This request is due to vehicles parking on Chapman Road near the intersection of Brittany Park Court which creates an obstruction of view for motorists looking east or west on Chapman Road. A traffic study was conducted at the location and on several occasions there have been vehicles parked on Chapman Road obstructing the view for motorists on Brittany Park Court. Staff has discussed this with the Police Department, and they have no objections to the no parking zone. It is requested the no parking zone be designated as a "No Parking at Anytime" zone. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve Ordinance No. 2101. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ o Accl. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Onetar City Manager Page 1 of . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2101 In order to protect the health and safety of the City and its inhabitants IT IS ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. It shall hereafter be unlawful for any person to park or leave unattended any motor vehicle at anytime upon the public streets or portions thereof set out as follows: Along the north side of Chapman Road from 7300 Chapman Road east to 7312 Chapman Road. 2. It is ordered that appropriate NO PARKING signs are authorized and directed to be installed upon the right-of-way of the above public street giving the public notice of these regulations. 3. Any person violating any portion of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not in excess of $200.00. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 26th day of February, 1996. APPROVED: ATTEST: Tommy Brown, Mayor Patricia Hutson, Assistant City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City " ( WATCH LINE SEE CRID:2084 438 ) dBOO ! i ....~~- -S'i>ve--- ~ _. ---------·t:: =:::=:. :::=:~~'P.~ì':,:,:,::: ::::::::'::':':':'- U - -f =.-:.~: ::::.:.J! 9..~: !'J!-_-.-01/:. ,_:___~ !!:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "25 : -00-00_00- I ' I, I . !!:I ¡ I /: c:;! : ' : : I Q;: , ! ' ¡ ,:: Ii. ' '., I "32 , I I ::.:: ' , "" --.-.-.-..-..-.J ~ L: ! i 'I' ~ i , ç.. Q ~..:~ ¡ i : ..----.--..-.-.-..---..-..-.., I : ~ i .... ~~.~1--· ¡r ,I ! I ! ~ ¡ I 'I' ¡ ! 1m ! I,' ! ~ : i ¡ , !:' r.¡ I ' " :: -I !!! ~: ! -"::-f~-'-"-)' L , I I 4' I ì~'~O"'" /" : "-"-"-"---r'~"----"-"l ¡ '___..____.._._.__.._..~.._ ______.._.._.. :.., ~ \) u I ~ " J .0 , , , ;.-1" , v'r''O~ I ' , ,1' -'.", i ¡.,; : .:..\ x..Ì'" : ! I 1105 :: I ",. 8?t S ! I I ! ~ ,: i -\---L.-..-.---.-L.-..-.-..-.-..-.._..H..OÞd.._ '~: ~ : -,--.'-.'-.----..-/ ;t... L ~ ! j , ,"-'---'-'-'-'-"-"-"--- ~ Q i ¡ ¡I,! ~ -:';;.: i I II i m. ~ ! I .. , ~ ~ ¡ i bf I '74 ~ : "" ,~: U ~ 'I i r ~..-.-.---._..-.-.._.____._.. \b '< , 'j : \5 ~. ¡ Ii! } N ! Ii i m. -..:..... . !¡~ i .... ~ ~ u~ì~!.~~I!.dJ...,.--ÿ ~ .'33 6725 I1H .. e",c e"se . . · CHAPMAN DR. e"se . -·'-',..,..,..,oo,._¡- .3IZ.j ¡ : I 1<00 r 140. i .4011 i 14IZ I 74/Z r 1420 I 14Z. ! 7. I I I i: ¡, I I I I I I : i i i :, ¡' i ¡ i ¡ I }.Oi--'C ~--":-"-"T'T"-~: : L--....:-..--"-.._:-.._-'-__ , ~. i \, ': /: ii I ! ! ! I ~ ! : .,'\, 7306 I 73De ! 7313 :: ¡: 1401 I '4D6 i 1<08 i 74,31 1</11 74Z1 ¡ 74z6174z.1 1<. I ""'>F~JJ lL_..I...,.Ll~-LL1~Ll r"-··-·'\:.. C~NDY C..... _..6"w .. JAMIE RENÆ i Ä:-'-' ..6''''' .. "{ .... 00, '-, ", .. I -. I .. I " I -', . : ,í i ,~i : I : : , , , , ! 73~./ i 7~ : Y"Z i :t;i i 74DO , 740·17<08 17<,Z 1 7< If 1 1410! 74Z4! .421 ! 7<. i / nOb'i-\-\¡.O! : ~i: ¡Ii Iii i I " ... . r I ~:~ ' I , , I , , , ~~~---~-"l'-"','-"-,,j'~! "-+-"-r"-f--r--r'-r-+'-r'" I ... ' ""'" I ' : .,\, 7306 '73D'! 731! :: r.¡¡ i 7<01 i 7406 i 74D1 174/3 i 74/1 i 742' ! 74Z6 ! 7<ze i 743 ! .'\, ! ! I ;~i; i ¡¡I j Iii '3DI '\'.--=---.. i ; e..¡ I ' : : I : L' : ~·-..-1:-·· ~:~;~~-s-·~·~~ ::; \.~--=::b::~::b::~~:-~::-----·::iE~ i \~.:.-- .6""r -', ".. 00/ 00 I 00,00 I '- I 00 .. I u I - , / í' . "" I ' ! 73~../' i '30' I 7!'Z i: ! i "00 ! 7.0./ 7408 i 74/2 ! '4/' ¡ 7420 I 74Z< ! 7<21 j ... ! /., 730. ,: I : ' :: I ! ! I ! I I ~! C' ' , "J : L' , L' , i,O "\- ~'-"---r-'-"I'-" ..' ! r'-', "-:-+-'-1---, -I-"-r'-R-~"- I : : '" : I : : I : I \ .3De 11''':' ! I 74DI ! 7<06 , 7<0' , '4/11 I 74/1/ 74ZI 11<., ! 74Z' ! 7<3, b.! // ¡I! ! / ! I ! '_/'-"'~oo l~..-LooL-.L_.L..L._L..L..L. ( ÌiËÃ-'ë-:"''-- '. ___u -00 -.. U u_.__ uu------u-------..--.-..--.--.-....-ï5Ã--.x ( WATCH LINE - SEE CRID:Z084-434 ) . .-------.... --- -----...-..- ..-------....-...-..-------------------.... ., > ib ~ ,I"'-. ~\\-~~ ~~:,3.'\() ,,() ¡...' .TON - ENCUsH - FlO\'\llRS, I He. ---- , - -..-. GIS ~ n _. . . - - o too 200 500 400 - - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Adm in istration Appointment of City Secretary and AssIstant City Secretary Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: 2/26/96 GN 96-26 Subject: The City Charter states that the Mayor appoints the City Secretary and Assistant City Secretary with approval of two-thirds majority of the City Council. It has been recommended that Ms. Patricia Hutson be appointed as City Secretary effective April 19, 1996. Ms. Lisa Daughtery has been recommended to be appointed as Assistant City Secretary effective April 19, 1996. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council take action on the appointments. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available .Operating Budget _ ~ Othe, ____ ~ ~ Department Head S;gnatu,e - { . -- . .. .,'::;:n:ge, CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance DIreC10r - Page 1 of ... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS O t Planning and Inspections epar ment: ubject: Consideration of a recommendation to amend the Public Works Design Manual regarding Masonry Screening Walls. . C . M . 0 2/26/96 - ouncl eettng ate: _ Agenda Numb~N 96-27 Resolution Number 96-16 The Planning & Zoning Commission has been discussing various construction techniques used in the industry for the construction of masonry screening walis along thoroughfares in the city. Of primary concern has been the utilization of precast panels ratherthan traditionaliy constructed brick and mortar screening walls. The fOliowing is a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission to amend the Public Works Design Manual, which regulates the construction techniques of masonry screening walis. The first paragraph contains the existing regulations which wili be deleted and the second paragraph contains the revised text. Existing text to be deleted . 10. Prefabricated screening fences such as "brickcrete" or "woodcrete" may be subsmuted for on-site masonry construction, provided that the finish resembles typical masonry constructed fences. No ordinary concrete finishes or traditional Concrete block as a finish shaii be aiiowed. However, a concrete finish consisting of exposed aggregate shall be allowed. Revised text to be adopted 10. Masonry screening waiis and fences shali be constructed of brick and mortar construction. Prefabricated or precast concrete panels shall not be substituted for on-site masonry constructed walls and fences. The following criteria shall be used in the design of a masonry screening wall: ' a. Precast or cut stone caps shall be allowed. b. Painted brick shall not be allowed. c. Precast grade beams shall be allowed. d. The screening wall elevation shall be a minimum of seventy-five (75) per cent masonry construction. e. No ordinary concrete block wall shall be allowed. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its February 8, 1996 meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDA TION: It recommended that the City· Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) . Operating Budget _ Ot~ )l~ ~ ~ment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . FInance DII.Clor 0",,,,,, 1 "f RESOLUTION NO. 96-16 . BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills desires to amend the minimum criteria for masonry screening walls; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted the "Public Works Design Manual" which regulates the construction of all masonry screening walls, by passage of Resolution No. 95-11. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the "Public Works Design Manual" is hereby amended to establish new regulations for masonry screening walls by amending Paragraph 10 of Section 1-07, which shall read as follows: 10. Masonry screening walls and fences shall be constructed of brick and mortar construction. Prefabricated or precast concrete panels shall not be substituted for on- site masonry constructed walls and fences. The following criteria shall be used in the design of a masonry screening wall: . a. b. c. d. Precast or cut stone caps shall be allowed. Painted brick shall not be allowed. Precast grade beams shall be allowed. The screening wall elevation shall be a minimum of seventy-five (75) per cent masonry construction. No ordinary concrete block wall shall be allowed. e. PASSED AND APPROVED, this 26th day of February, 1996 Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City . PZ Minutes - Pa e 4 Chairman Barfield stated that the site on Rufe Snow wi I and pave most of the site for servo e rear of the property maâe the motion to approve PZ 96-04 subject to the exterior being brick and the .. . k, The motion Plats and Subdivisions 5. Consideration of a recommendation to the City Council regarding Masonry Screening Walls adjacent to thoroughfares. TABLED 1/25/96 Mr. Davis stated he is opposed to allowed an exposed aggregate finish. He stated he has no problem with the rest of the items. Mr. Lueck asked why painted brick is not allowed. Chairman Barfield stated to make it easier to remove graffiti from the walls by sand blasting or water blasting. Mr. Arrington stated that most paint manufacturers have an additive to paint that will allow light sand or water blasting to allow graffiti removal. Mr. Davis made the motion to take this recommendation to the City Council, subject to deleting Section B (exposed aggregate), and changing the wording in Section F to not allow concrete block walls. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck. The motion carried 6-0. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was ad' David Barfield, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Appointment of Crime Control and Prevention District Board of l1irectors - Resolr Ition No qn-17 Council Meeting Date: 2/26/96 Subject: Agenda Number: GN q6-?8 On February 20, 1996 North Richland Hills voters approved the %¢ sales tax referendum for the Crime Control and Prevention District. At a meeting prior to the February 26th Council Meeting, the temporary Crime Control and Prevention Board of Directors is to meet and canvas the votes from that election. The first step in creation of the District is for the City Council to appoint the permanent Board of Directors for the District. The State Law on this issue indicates that the Council should appoint seven directors in the same manner that the temporary directors were selected. A resolution has been prepared related to appointment of the Board of Directors. The initial appointees for this Board will be required to draw lots to determine the three directors that will serve terms that expire on September 1 of the first year following creation of the District, which would be September 1, 1997. The requirements are that the other four directors would serve terms that expire on September 1 of the second year following the creation of the District, which would be September 1, 1998. The proposed resolution also provides that the Board would develop Bylaws and Rules of Procedures and that these would be submitted to Council for their review and approval. This would of course be done after the Board has organized and selected officers and considered other business of the Crime Control District. Recommendation: It is recommended that Resolution No. 96-17 be approved and that the City Council appoint the seven members to the permanent Crime Control and Prevention Districts of North Richland Hills. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other ~ Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance O....etor Page 1 of I e RESOLUTION NO. 96-17 WHEREAS, on the 20th day of February, 1996, North Richland Hills voters approved a %¢ sales tax for purposes of establishing and funding a Crime Control and Prevention District in accordance with Article 2370c-4, Texas Revised Civil Statutes; and WHEREAS, Section 4.01 of State Statute provides that such Crime Control and Prevention District be governed by a Board of Directors of seven directors appointed by City Council. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, that: 1. The following persons are hereby appointed to the permanent Crime Control and Prevention District Board of Directors: Place 1 e Place 2 Place 3 Place 4 Place 5 Place 6 Place 7 2. Such Board members shall serve staggered two year terms that expire September 1. Initial appointees shall draw lots to determine length of initial terms, as follows: 1) Three directors to serve terms that expire September 1 of the following year of the creation of the District (September 1, 1997); and e e e e RESOLUTION NO. 96-17 Page Two 2) Four directors to serve terms that expire September 1 of the second year following the creation of the District (September 1, 1998). 3) All terms following the initial appointments shall be two year terms as indicated in Section 4.01 of Article 2370c-4. 3. Officers of the Crime Control and Prevention District shall be selected in accordance with Section 4.05 of Article 2370c-4 at a meeting of the Crime Control Board. 4. By-laws and Rules of Procedure shall be developed and approved by the Crime Control and Prevention District Board with review and approval by North Richland Hills City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED this 26th day of February, 1996. APPROVED: ATTEST: Tommy Brown, Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Concealed Weapons in City Owned Subject: Rllilrlino~ - Orrlin::lnr.p NO ?106 Council Meeting Date: 2/26/96 Agenda Number: GN 96-29 The attached ordinance addresses the issue of carrying handguns in City owned buildings. This ordinance is submitted at the request of Councilwoman Sansousie and Councilman Oujesky. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider the adoption of Ordinance No. 2106. . Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) .operating Budget _ Other _ Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available /: Finan"" DIr.Clot Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of .. . . ORDINANCE NO. 2106 WHEREAS, the 74th Legislature of Texas has amended Title 70 of the Vernon's Revised Civil Statutes by adding Article 4413(2gee), more commonly know as the "Texas Concealed Weapons Act" which became effective on September 1, 1995 and which set forth regulations for carrying concealed handguns and allows businesses, both public and private to prohibit persons who are licensed under Article 4413(2gee), Texas Revised Civil Statutes from carrying a concealed handgun in any building owned by the business; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that in order to protect the citizens and inhabitants of the City and to protect the interest of all persons residing in the City and to promote the general welfare, it is necessary to prohibit all persons from carrying a firearm in a City building. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, that: 1. The action of the City Manager in issuing Management Policy number CMA-0066, effective January 23, 1996, is hereby ratified and approved. PASSED and APPROVED this 26th day of February, 1996. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: . Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Fire Department Council Meeting Date: 2/26/96 Subject: Award Bid for Installation of a Fuel T;:mk M::m;::¡oement System at Fire Station One Agenda Number: PU 96-18 In the 1995/96 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for the installation of a fuel tank management system at Fire Station One located at 8300 Starnes. Formal bids were solicited and the results are outlined below. St. Andrews Environmental Fuel, Inc. m:t¡;¡¡1i:gZ Enviroserve, Inc. $7,400 $7,550 $9,559 United Pump Supply United Services of Texas The installation of this system will provide automatic leak detection and fuel inventory management capabilities at Fire Station One. St. Andrews Environmental Fuel, Inc. met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and can complete the installation in thirty days. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for installation of the fuel tank management system to St. Andrews Environmental Fuel, Inc. in the amount of $7,197. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ .¿¡:B,u~tj~ ~ - Depart~~tu'e CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 01-90-06-3465 bl Flnlll'lC8 Director Page 1 of " ,J CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Award of Bid to Sharrock Electric, Inc. for Traffic Signalization Subject: nn Mirl-r.itip.~ Rnl Jlp.v~rrl ~t Hnlirl~y I ~np. Agenda Number: 2/26/96 PU 96-19 Bids were received for this project on February 13, 1996 and the two bids received are shown below: Bidder Amount Sharrock Electric Inc. Traffic Signals Inc. $56,557.00 $61,405.00 The anticipated start date for the project is June 15, 1996 and should be completed by July 31, 1996. A 16 week delivery date for signal poles will delay the start date. The contractor has 60 days to complete the project once the materials have been received. Funding Source: Sufficient funds are budgeted in the 1996 Bond Sale for this project (engineering - $15,000; construction $85,000). The project budget was approved on 2/12/96, GN 96-23. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council award the bid to Sharrock Electric, Inc. in the amount of $56,557.00. Finance Review ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 02-24-03-6000 Finan.. Director ( Page 1 of . . . BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 2630 West Freeway, Suite 132 . Fort Worth, Texas 76102 USA. (817) 877 ·5803 . Fax (817) 877-3214 Memorandum To: Jimmy Cates From: Jody Short Date: February 13, 1996 Subject: Traffic Signal at Watauga Road and Holiday Lane I have reviewed the bids opened this morning. Bids were received from two firms. Both appeared to be in order and all calculations were correct. Based on our experience with the firms that submitted bids, both are qualified to do the work. We recommend that the project be awarded to Sharrock Electric, Inc. from Fort Worth, Texas, the firm that submitted the lowest bid of $56,557.00. Please call if you need additional information or assistance. We will schedule a preconstruction meeting following action by the City Council. [!!!:I] PARSONS · TRANSPORTATION GROUP , . . c: o :;:; .! :::::J .c C'O .... 0) c: :E! C'O m...J >. C'O C'O c:"c C): ,- 0 cn:I: ,~ - :t:C'O C'O"C .... C'O .... 0 .!!!tk: = C'O :I:C) "C:::::J c:,5 C'O C'O :c~ (.) ~ ~ ~ o z . - 0) en -0 C'Oo E :;:;E IIJ Q) W=: IIJ -.... 0)- 0) en c: 0 '510 c:- w'ë :) 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 ooooooooooooo0oo~ooo~rooo~~ oroOOOOONOOOOOmOO~O~~N~ro~O~ oororo~~O~~~ON~N~N~~~~~~roo~~ -~~Ñ~Ñ~~~~ÑÑÑ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~Ñ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ 0000000000000000000000000 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~~OOO OOOOOOOO~OOOO~OO~~0~OO~N~ ON~OOOOOrooooo~~O~~~~~~~~~ ~~M~~~O~~~ONN ~N ~ -~~~~~~~~ ~ÑÑ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 oooooooooorororo0ooooooo00roo~ o~orooooroo~~~~mO~m~~MO~~N~O ro~~~m~~Om~M~MN~~~~M~~MM~O~ -~~Ñ~Ñ~ro~~ÑÑÑ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ 0000000000000000000000000 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooro~roo OOO~~ooo~ororom~oo00~~NOOON O~oroNooom~~~ro~o~~~~~~~~~~ m~M~~~~~~~M~~ M~ ~ -~~~ ~~ro~ ~ÑÑ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~~OOO~O~~~ OmNNOOO~OOOOON~~ON~~O~~M~~ ~~M~O~OMO~Ororo~~~~~~~M~m~~~ ~~~~ÑÑro~ÑÑ~Ñrom~~~~~~~~~~~W ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~ 0000000000000000000000000 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~ON o~~oooooooooo~oo~~000~o~N ~M~mOOOOooOOO~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ON~~Oro~ N~ ~ ~~~ ~N-ro-~~~~N-~- ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ z¡ C ro :J o ro ~ 0 ~O~~ N~roro~~~ .0~~~NNN~~~~~0~roMM M ~NN ~ ~Nro~~~~~~ C) C "0 C en ro Q) I .e ~ ~ >- .§ ro en ·.ern "0"0"0"0 ~ en ëE"O ~Q) Q)Q) .... «~oQ)c ~ o~"O "0"00 "0 cooen:J C cCQ) IDID> C C) - en 0 « « « C :2 Q) Q) ~ 0 ._ ._ > ro .- 0 u) « u.. ""= ""= ""= 0 a. ¡:: ~ 0 > .I:: ~ « - enCJ)2 >--- .c::::.c::::.c:::: 0 ....CD0::;:CJ)CJ)N ~ "0 è Q) CJ) Q) Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .;...;.. I I $: ...... ~ 0 ~ _00 ccC'Oro 0---- -~N- 0> w 0 '- '- ~ ~ ~ ro ro en :J :J .- ._..... .... ·CJ)-cQ)~en~.e.eCJ)CJ)NN~~en~"O"O:J:J«~~~1 OI:J C ro ro ro -..-..-...8 Q)"'V c: c"O"O~ ' I '0 c§ø~_CDQ)~OO"O"OQ)Q)Q)oð~oo§§~OOO-" .2 - Q) Q) ro.I::...J .... ~ ~ Q) Q) 0 0 Õ 2 CD 0 0 0 0 0 'r -.. -.. -.. ~ - ro "0 CJ) C en E E Q) Q).- .- a. a. a. Q) 0 M ~ N M ~ ~ N ro .2> :J = = 0 0 0 "0 ...J 0 0 0 0 I I I I I ~=oroCJ)a.°oee ro~ro c~:2:2»Q)Q)Q)Q)Q) E ~ 'E C "0 "0 ~ ~ ë ë « CD C C C g- 5 2 a::: a::: a. a. :c .e .e .e .c Q) Q) 0 ro.2> Q) Q) ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 .2>.2>.2> 0 ~ Q) - _ _ _ ro ro ro ro ro 01- =:0 ccCJ)a.a.OOOOMMCJ)CJ)CJ)...J0:2~~~~00000 l- e E . Q) 0 -2 ,- I NM~~~~romO~NM~~~~romo~NM~~~« ~~~~~~~~~~NNNNNNNffil CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Park and Recreation Council Meeting Date: 2/26/96 Subject: AIJthnri7p. PIJrr.hR!=;p. nf Rig Sr¡llÌrt WRtp.r Tny Agenda Number: PU 96-20 Last year the number one seller at the NRH20 Gift Shop was the Big Squirt water toy. Approximately 4,500 units were sold at $4..99 each. The water toys are a sole source purchase from Big Squirt, Inc. The City may take advantage of a quantity discount from the company and 5,000 units may be purchased at $2.30 each for a total of $11,500. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council authorize the purchase of water toys from Big Squirt, Inc. in the amount of $11,500. Finance Review Source of Funds: 21-03-01-2080 Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ ~JkA"":tñ--u .vItro ~. Department Head''Š'ig'hãttire CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Parks and Recreation Department 2-26-96 - Council Meeting Date: eUbject: Award Bid for Installation of Tube Slide at NRH20 Agenda Number: PU 96-21 Formal bids have been solicited for installation of a new tube slide at NRHzO as presented in the 1996 Policy and Enhancement Recommendations Report. The report was presented and approved by City Council at the December 11, 1995 meeting. The bid results are outlined below. Whitewater $292,858 Pro Slide $300,660 Funding for the installation of the new tube slide is included in the 1995/96 Park CIP Budget as approved by Council December 11, 1995. An additional $8,814 is available from the 1995 retained earnings for completion of this project. RECOMMENDATION: . It is recommended City Council award the bid for the purchase and installation of the new tube slide at NRHzO to Whitewater in the amount of $292,858, and amend the 1995/96 Capital Project Budget in the amount of $8,814 for this project. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget .Other IvØ/H1~ ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Fmance Dlfector Page 1 of t , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Award Hid tor FacIlity Enhancements at NRH20 - Supplemental Data Council Meeting Date: 2/26/96 Subject: Agenda Number: PI J An-??A Attached to this cover sheet is Informal Report 96-23, which identifies the recommended facility enhancements to be included in the contract with Ridgemont. The recommended improvements amount to $169,000. However, as mentioned previously, it will be necessary to authorize the bid to Ridgemont in its original amount of $326,398 ,and on March 25, 1996 execute a Change Order deducting $157,398 from the contract. Recommendation: It is recommended that Council award the bid for the facility improvements at NRH20 to Ridgemont, and amend the 1995/96 Capital Projects Budget to include $169,000 for this project. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Op~rating Budget _ ~~I?~ - Dep me Finance Director Page 1 of INFORMAL REPORTTO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. I R 96-23 e ~ Date February 23, 1996 T SUbj~ct: Facility Enhancements at NRH20 The award of bid for the facility enhancements at NRH20 is being considered as agenda item PU 96-22 at the February 26, 1996 City Council meeting. As indicated in the cover sheet for this item, staff has completed the evaluation of the bids received. Each proposed enhancement was assessed on the basis of priority and cost. The following enhancements, listed in order of need, were included in the bid package: . Landscape and Concrete Improvements Guest Services Kiosk Conversion of the Arcade into an Ice Cream Shop Food and Beverage and Slide Tower Shade Structures Lifeguard and Employee Team Station Large Guest Clock Drainage Systems and Pavers Funbrella Area River Booster Pump Additional Sidewalks and Irrigation Relocation Staff recommends executing a deduct change order at the March 25. 1996 City Council meeting in the amount of $157,398. This deduct change order would delete the following items from the contract: Minor Drainage Alterations and Pavers Funbrella Area River Booster Pump Additional Sidewalk and Irrigation Relocation It would be our suggestion to include these deleted projects in a subsequent fiscal year. Upon execution of the change order. the revised contract amount will be $169,000. Funding will be provided from the Aquatic Park Enterprise Fund - Retained Earnings. Respectfully submitted, /JA~ . Bill Thornton ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Parks and Recreation Department Council Meeting Date: 2-26-96 Subject: Award Bid for Facility Enhancements at NRH20 Agenda Number: PU 96-22 Formal bids have been solicited for the facility enhancements at NRH20 as presented in the 1996 Policy and Enhancement Recommendations Report. The Report was presented and approved by City Council at the December 11, 1995 meeting. A budget was not established at that time. Acceptance of this bid will require establishing a budget and appropriating funds. The bids included all proposed enhancements listed in Recommendations for Improvements section of the Report. Although it was anticipated that the available funding in the 1995 retained earnings would not complete the entire list of enhancements, all were included in the bid for cost evaluation. The bids received are outlined below. Ridgemont $326,398 R. J. Miller $337,500 The individual items are being evaluated on the basis of priority and cost, and results of this evaluation and recommendations will be forwarded to City Council. Procedurally, it will be necessary for Council to approve the entire bid and acknowledge projects to be deleted. At the next Council meeting a change order deleting the items will be acted on. Funding will be provided from the Aquatic Park Enterprise Fund - Retained Earnings. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council award the bid for the facility enhancements at NRH20 to Ridgemont, and amend the 1995/96 Capital Project Budget. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) AOperating Budget _ .Other _ ¿/d#~~ ~ Departmen(Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 21-10-02-6000 FlnMce Dlroctor Page 1 of I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DepartmentFinance /Information Services Council Meeting Date: 2/26/96 Subject Aw;::¡rd Rir! for r.LJhix Procp.~~or r.;::¡rr!~ for Computer Upgrade Agenda Number: PU 96-23 In the 1995/96 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for upgrades to computer equipment. Formal bids were solicited for Cubix processor cards to be installed in computer equipment located at Fire Station Four. One bid was received from Vaughan/Caudle Associates in the amount of $7,124. Bids were solicited once before with no response received. This upgrade will assist Fire Stations One, Two, and Three in processing and sending information to Fire Administration at Station Four in a more timely manner. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for Cubix processor cards to Vaughan/Caudle Associates in the amount of $7,124. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget X- Other ~, ~Á . ?I7v- Depa ent ~~ture CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 16-01-03-6460 Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 2/26/96 Subject: Award Bid for Office Furniture Agenda Number: PU 96-24 In the approved move-in budget for the City Hall expansion project, Council appropriated funds for the purchase of office furniture. Formal bids were solicited for this furniture and the results are outlined below. National Business Furniture No Bid Texas Furniture Source B T Office Products $44,589 $ªß~§Zª The specifications stated this would be an all-or-none purchase. Texas Furniture Source no bid several items so their bid was incomplete. BT Office Products met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and can deliver the furniture by the required dates. This furniture shall be located in the Administration, Public Works, City Attorney, Finance, Human Resource, Information Services, Planning and Inspection and Economic Development departments. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for office furniture to B T Office Products in the amount of $46,679. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) :Jf7);~ge,t ;;/; ¡J e ~ v W~t ~~aâ~gnature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 13-70-96-6000 Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS " Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Approve the Sale of Lot 9, Block 38, Richland Terrace Subject: Addition to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company _ Agenda Number: Resolution No. 96-15 2/26/96 PW 96-1l! The City purchased Lot 9, Block 38, Richland Terrace Addition on March 16,1989. Compensation paid was back property taxes totaling $1,242.44. The lot is located at the northeast corner of Holiday Lane and Maplewood Avenue and was needed by the City in order to realign the Holiday Lane/Maplewood Avenue intersection. Only a small portion of the lot was needed for this project. The lot has a net area of 6,657 square feet. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company would like to acquire the lot to build a 9' x 16' mini-hut on the lot in order to provide more service capacity to the area. The Attorney for the City advised that we would have to advertise for bids on the property. This was done and the bid opening was held on 12/8/95. No bids were received. There is a water well on the lot that is no longer in use but has not been plugged and abandoned. Southwestern Bell proposes to have the water well plugged and abandoned at their expense, in exchange for the City deeding the lot to them. Southwestern Bell received bids to have the water well plugged and the low bid is $4,250.00. This estimate is based on the work complying with the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission requirements. Southwestern Bell appeared before the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 8, 1996, and requested a Special Use Permit (No. 96-03), since the lot is currently zoned R-2. The permit was granted with the stipulation Southwestern Bell build a landscaped berm around the mini-hut. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve Resolution No. 96-15 authorizing the Mayor to sign a Special VVarranty Deed conveying Lot 9, Block 38, Richland Terrace Addition to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company under the stipulations outlined above. This recommendation is made subject to Council approval of Special Use Permit No. 96-03. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director Page 1 of , · · · RESOLUTION NO. 96-15 WHEREAS, the remainder of Lot 9, Block 38, Richland Terrace Addition is owned by the City of North Richland Hills; and WHEREAS, such lot is no longer needed by the City; and WHEREAS, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company proposes to acquire ownership of the Lot for just compensation; and WHEREAS, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company will plug the existing water well on Lot 9 in accordance with State law at no expense to the City; and WHEREAS, acquisition of the Lot was advertised to the public and no other bids were received. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. Ownership of Lot 9, Block 38, Richland Terrace Addition be granted to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. 2. The Mayor be and is hereby authorized to execute a Special Warranty Deed from the City to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. The City retains a five (5') foot utility easement along the east side of the Lot. PASSED AND APPROVED this 26th day of February, 1996. APPROVED: ATTEST: Tommy Brown, Mayor Patricia.Hutson, Assistant City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City 2 I" NOFl1H H15· 'NOW~ I 2" I. ~. >- :J: i!: z ;: >< « ~ ~Oflíl1 \1í5. i5~O~ 12 icØJ I 3" .- LÒCf/TIQN /'1 17 P I" I. 1\ 3" J4 ," 11 ... J VI 0 I. ~ 0 " 0 OJ a: ",~Ib~1b " þ.Cf: y/þ.L.L.y ~ ! 2 I ... y/ ftJ8"f: 6 VI 5 160 w 0 r .,. 0 ;¡ z >- ,. "I 0 0 OJ a: ·..·c SH~UN~ OR i I 1 I ' 3, . ! I 29 /, I I I i 1 I' i . ~ :. I VI - o g !!' ~ !'I :~~~ OR Š X 1 I , 13 " I~ .. z I w ..J ..J >- I .:: « >- S I. OJ 1\ 2 0 " 1!7 :2 I' ,. ,. HIGH uL.þ.NO FlICP þ.OON ~ 1 o a: <11 o ..J o Z >- OJ a: , 41 ,..5 . .¿' t:J~ ? ," 0" w >- .. >- w Z « ..J <XI :','1 12 10 II 11 ," :!<! 3 Z ..J >- « o ..J o '9 I 24631. I ANETH, OR to \1 Z ..J ..J OJ a: .. ::> ..J '.,,¡ w~y .17, ./ '0 I' " ] " 11 2. þ BEING PART OF LOT 9. BLOCK 38 OF RICHLAND TERRACE ADDITION. AN ADDITION TO lHE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 388-14. PAGE 74. PLAT RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, I I I~ .lVO~ l ?>.ij' Þ <9.0 <';40" ~ '.?' .¿ '-- °Oþ ~ ~ ~ :i ~ 0 a:: b "'1 1/1 ~ --- a ~ ~ 0) lr5 ~ 1/2" IRF HOlE: n'flS SURVEY WAS DONE IIITHOUT THE BENEFlT Of ^ l1TI.E COWI.4INEtH, THERE 1.4 A Y BE EASÐ.IENTS OR OTHER CONVEYANCES AFFECTlNC THIS PROPERTY THAT ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON, b o o 1/1 ~ LOT 7 BLOCK 38 LOT 12 BLOCK 38 ~ . o .0 r o o z I I I I ~I CD ~I N89'SS'00" E 5.80'29'38"[, 0,76' 1/2" IRF LOT 8 BLOCK .38 LOT 11 BLOCK .38 ~ 1/2" IRS 134,00 1/2" IRF PART OF LOT 9 BLOCK 38 (6.657,.3 SQUARE FEET. NET) ~ =ã gC't) ;...t\i .,...0) LOT 10 b BLOCK 38 a CtJ 't'ÆLL CAP 0 ~ ::J r= ::> --- 15' B,L, 0,8' BROKEN TX DOT MONUMENT 108,00 ----- <9-20 MAPLE WOOD AVE ANY REFERENCE TO "FLOOD PLAIN" ON THIS PLAT IS AN ESTIMATE BASED ON DATA AVAILABLE AND IS NOT TO R~ ('()N<::,r,!:'p!:'n ð<::: ^ nC"TC"D""'^T'"'' ,-'r" ~"r- ~'r-r-~",~ r-~_,,_.. ,_ _ _ __ .. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Approve Agreement for Engineering Services with Subject: Carter & Burgess, Inc for Sanitary Sewer Overflow Abatement Study Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: 2/26/96 PW 96-15 Staff has requested and reviewed a contract with Carter & Burgess, Inc. to perform a Sanitary Sewer Overflow Abatement Study for the City in response to the EPA Region 6 Administrative Order (AO.) Docket No. V1-95-01 01. The City received the EPA's second AO. on February 20, 1996 which approved our recommended abatement study as submitted on October 19, 1995. Carter & Burgess will perform project management, prepare a "best management plan" (BMP), update the existing sanitary sewer map, perform hydraulic analysis and modeling, prepare final engineering report outlining any rehabilitation projects necessary with estimates of cost, and assist client in negotiating a time schedule with the EPA for the rehabilitation program. The scope of services including the subconsultants cost is not to exceed $650,000 as outlined in Attachment U A" of the agreement. Funding Source: Funds to pay for these services will be provided from a sanitary sewer surcharge to be collected from all customers. Surcharge options will be presented with recommendations at the March 25, 1996 Council Meeting. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve the agreement with Carter & Burgess, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $650,000, authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement, and amend the 1995/96 CIP Budget accordingly. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Ot er Acct. Number Sutf~ ' . ~ .natue ~C~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance O"eC101 Page 1 of - . C'-Æ Carter" Burgess Consultants in Engineering, Architecture, Planning and the Environment AUTHORIZATION FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROJECT NAME Phase II Engineering Assistance PROJECT NUMBER 951515020 CUENT City of North Richland Hills ADDRESS 7301 Northeast Loop 820 P. O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 hereby requests and authorizes Carter & Burgess, Inc. to perfonn the following services: SCOPE: Provide engineering assistance for the City of North Rlchland Hills In accordance with the Scope of Services outlined In Attachment A . COMPENSATION to be on a basis of an hourly rate times a multJpller of 3.151, with a maximum not-to-exceed fee of $650,000.00. Fee Is discussed further In Attachment A A schedule of hourly rates Is provided on Attachment B. If technical or professional services are furnished by an outside source, an additional 8% shall be added to the cost of the services for Carter & Burgess, Inc.'s administrative costs. Refer to relevant discussions under Part II of Attachment A Services covered by this authorization shall be performed In accordance with PROVISIONS stated on the back of this form. Approved for CUENT By: ~L C. A Sanford Tltle:~~ ~~ B~ ~~ F H. Evans, P.E. - By: Title: City Manaaer Title: ~ce President . Date: MISC\~1~1502.4.P1 Date: Februarv 21. 1996 Cart~r & Bur...",,, Inc, 1Ppn H, ,I"" ~tro"t F""",-t \J../..........t, T_."",,-.<: 7t..1n7.7'"J':::;,! PROVISIONS . 1. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED Signing this form shall be construed as authorization by CUENT for C&B, Inc. to proceed with the work, unless otherwise provided for in the authorization. 2. LABOR COSTS C&B, Inc.'s Labor Costs shall be the amount of salaries paid C&B, Inc.'s employees for work performed on CUENTS Project plus a stipulated percentage of such salaries to cover all payroll-related taxes, payments, premiums, and benefits. 3. DIRECT EXPENSES C&B, Inc.'s Direct Expenses shall be those costs incurred on or directly for the CUENrS Project, induding but not limited to necessary transportation costs induding mileage at C&B, Inc.'s current rate when its automobiles are used, meals and lodging, laboratory tests and analyses, computer services, word processing services, telephone, printing and binding charges. Reimbursement for these EXPENSES shall be on the basis of actual charges when fumished by commercial sources and on the basis of usual commercial charges when furnished by C&B, Inc. . 4. OUTSIDE SERVICES When technical or professional services are fumished by an outside source, when approved by CUENT, an additional amount shall be added to the cost of these services for C&B, Ine.'s administrative costs, as provided on the reverse side of this agreement 5. COST ESTIMATES Any cost estimates provided by C&B, Ine. will be on a basis of experience and judgement, but since it has no control over market conditions or bidding procedures C&B, Inc. cannot warrant that bids or ultimate construction costs will not vary from these cost estimates. 6. PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS C&B, Inc. shall be responsible, to the level of competency presently maintained by other practicing professional engineers in the same type of work in CUENT'S community, for the professional and technical soundness, accuracy, and adequacy of all design, drawings, specifications, and other work and materials furnished under this Authorization. C&B, Inc. makes no other warranty, expressed or implied. . 7. TERMINATION Either CUENT or C&B, Inc. may terminate this authorization by giving 30 days written notice to the other party. In such event CUENT shall forthwith pay C&B, Inc. in full for all work previously authorized and performed prior to effective date of termination. If no notice of termination is given, relationships and obligations created by this Authorization shall be terminated upon completion of all applicable requirements of this Authorization. 8. ARBITRATION All daims, disputes, and other matters in question arising out of, or relating to, this Authorization or the breach thereof may be decided by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association then obtaining. Either CUENT or C&B, Inc. may initiate a request for such arbitration, but consent of the other party to such procedure shall be mandatory. No arbitration arising out of, or relating to this Authorization may indude, by consolidation, joinder, or in any other manner, any additional party not a party to this Authorization. 9. LEGAL EXPENSES In the event legal action is brought by CUENT or C&B, Inc. against the other to enforce any of the obligations hereunder or arising out of any dispute conceming the terms and conditions hereby created, the losing party shall pay the prevailing party such reasonable amounts for fees, costs and expenses as may be set by the court. 10. PAYMENT TO C&B,INC. Monthly invoices will be issued by C&B, Ine. for all work performed under the terms of this agreement. Invoices are due and payable on receipt. Interest at the rate of 111.% per month will be charged on all past-due amounts, unless not permitted by law, in which case, interest will be charged at the highest amount permitted by law. 11. UMrTATlON OF UABIUTY C&B, Ine.'s liability to the CUENT fa( any cause or combination of causes is in the aggregate, limited to an amount no greater than the fee earned under this agreement. 12. ADDmONAl SERVICES Services in addition to those specified in Scope will be provided by C&B, Inc. if authorized in writing by CUENT. Additional services will be paid for by CUENT as indicated in attached Basis of Compensation or as negotiated. 13. SALES TAX In accordance with the State Sales Tax Codes, certain surveying services are taxable. Applicable sales tax i§ !!Q! induded in the above proposed fee. Sales tax at an applicable rate will be indicated on invoice statements. 14. SURVEYING SERVICES In accordance with the Professional land Surveying Practices Act of 1989, the client is informed that any complaints about surveying services may be forwarded to the Texas Board of Professional land Surveying, 7701 North lamar, Suite 400, Austin, Texas 78752, (512) 452-9427. In case anyone or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall be held illegal, the enforceability of the remaining provisions contained herein shall not be impaired thereby. REV 01/91 . PHASE II ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE ATTACHMENT A - SCOPE OF SERVICES I. SCOPE OF SERVICES Carter & Burgess, Inc., the Engineer, shall assist the City of North Richland Hills (CLIENT) in the performance of a Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Abatement Study for the CLIENT's sanitary sewer system in accordance with CLIENT's response to U.S. EPA Region 6 Administrative Order (A.O.) Docket No. VI-95-Q1 01, including the following Scope of Services: A. Prepare for and negotiate with EPA an agreed order consistent with the A.G. and CLIENT's response. B. Perform and/or engage subconsultants to perform work tasks as ordered by EPA including the following: 1. 2. . 3. 4. 5. 6. Preparation of a Best Management Plan (BMP) for the system study and system maintenance program . Monitor collection and transmittal of SSG reports, including training and review of work efforts of CLIENT's personnel. Physical assessment of the existing collection system as prescribed in the CLIENT's response. Perform flow monitoring, smoke testing, and hydraulic modeling of the collection system as prescribed in the CLIENT's response. Cleaning and internal video (T.V.) inspection (up to 75,000 linear feet). Prepare a Final Engineering Report in accordance with the time schedule negotiated with EPA. The Final Engineering Report will contain a comprehensive assessment of rehabilitations needed, an implementation schedule and the Engineer's opinion of probable cost. 7. Assist the CLIENT in negotiating a time schedule for implementing the recommended rehabilitation program. II. COMPENSATION The Engineer is authorized to perform the services required by the Scope of Services listed above, not to exceed a total maximum fee of $650,000.00. Breakdown of this fee shall generally be as shown under the following study budget (these numbers were taken from the CLIENT's response to the A.O. and, with regard to field services and equipment purchases, are approximate in nature). The engineer's fee for personnel shall be at the hourly rate times a multiplier of 3.151 in accordance with Attachment B. Charges for sUbconsultants, travel and other direct expenses shall be at actual invoice cost times a multiplier of 1.08. All subconsultant contracts will be negotiated by Carter & Burgess, Inc. and approved by CLIENT prior to issuance of Notice to Proceed. . MISC\95151502.AT1 Page 1 . Item Quantity Unit Price Total General Services Project Management NTE - $60,000.00 Best Management Plan NTE - $20,000.00 Update Existing Map NTE - $10,000.00 Modeling/Hydraulic Analysis NTE - $15,000.00 Preparation of Final Engineering Report NTE - $57,000.00 . Subtotal I i I $162,000.00 I Field Services Temporary Flow Monitoring (10 Sites for 60 Days) 6OOEa. $75.00 $45,000.00 Smoke Testing 500,000 LF. $0.24 $120,000.00 Cleaning 75,000 LF. $1.25 $93,750.00 Internal T.V. Inspection 75,000 LF. $1.00 $75,000.00 Manhole Inspection 1,500 M.H. $58.00 $87,000.00 Dye Water Testing 75 Sites. $175.00 $13,125.00 Data Analysis/Field Supervision/Field Meetings 500,000 LF. $0.04 $20,000.00 . Subtotal" i ! $453,875.00 I Optional Services Purchase Temporary Flow Meters 5 Ea. $3,000.00 $15,000.00 Purchase Rainfall Monitoring Equipment 3 Ea. $400.00 $1,200.00 Computer System 1 Ea. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Personnel Training 1 LS. - $10,000.00 Subtotal III $31,200.00 TOTAL COST (Subtotal I + Subtotal" + Subtotal III) $647,075.00 BUDGET $650,000.00 . 'NTE = Not to Exceed III. ADDITIONAL SERVICES In the event that additional services beyond the Scope of Services listed above are required, the Engineer will request and obtain written authorization prior to proceeding. . MISC\95151502.AT1 Page 2 ATTACHMENT B . CARTER & BURGESS, INC. SALARY RANGES JANUARY 1, 1995 . Average Hourly Salary Hourly Salary Range Principal $47.81 $33.17 - $74.52 Associate Principal 39.58 33.17 - 51.44 Associate 31.42 18.27 - 48.08 Branch Manager 37.99 35.82 - 40.16 Senior Project Manager 32.97 18.50 - 50.00 Project Manager 26.50 19.23 - 40.00 Senior Engineer 28.47 20.00 - 37.50 Engineer II 22.60 18.27 - 29.81 Engineer I 17.27 13.94 - 23.72 Senior Environmental Scientist 21.20 20.25 - 22.15 Air Transportation Planner 26.84 26.44 - 27.24 Senior Consultant 29.99 26.44 - 33.89 Field Representative 18.88 16.00 - 21.53 Consultant 31.30 18.50 - 75.00 Senior Architect 32.45 25.48 - 37.02 Architect II 19.09 16.83 - 23.80 Architect I 17.02 12.50 - 22.21 Senior Planner 25.69 21.22 - 29.33 Planner II 17.16 10.00 - 20.30 Planner I 13.52 10.34 - 16.59 Geologist 17.91 13.94 - 23.56 Hydrologist 13.65 11.44 - 15.87 GIS Specialist 20.74 17.25 - 24.52 Survey Manager 29.87 27.28 - 32.45 Survey Project Manager 24.04 24.04 - 24.04 Survey CADD Ualson 20.51 20.51 - 20.51 Survey Technician 15.43 11.10 - 18.00 CADD System Manager 21.93 21.57 - 22.60 Network Administrator 15.63 15.63 - 15.63 CADD System Administrator 16.59 16.59 - 16.59 Scheduler 19.61 15.14 - 23.43 Party Chief II 14.79 13.50 - 16.50 Party Chief I 12.45 11.25 - 13.50 Instrumentman II 10.85 9.50 - 14.00 Instrumentman I 9.09 7.50 - 10.50 Estimator 16.36 13.00 - 19.71 Rodman 6.81 6.10 - 8.00 Lead Designer 21.96 18.63 - 27.75 Senior Designer 18.71 16.70 - 24.04 Designer 15.89 12.50 - 21.64 CADD Operator 14.40 12.30 - 16.50 CADD Drafter 13.46 9.36 - 15.50 Computer Systems Manager 20.24 19.22 - 21.20 Chief Drafter 18.50 17.32 - 19.67 Senior Drafter 14.62 12.72 - 16.13 Drafter 12.10 5.25 - 16.47 Word Processor/Secretary 12.11 9.00 - 16.40 .