HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1996-07-22 Agendas
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HilLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 22, 1996 - 6:45 P.M.
· For the Meeting conducted at the North Richl¿md Hi1Is Community Center in the Municrpal Court
Room, 6720 Northeast loop 820.
·
, :..
NUMBER ITEM. ACTION:'f.AKEN
1. IR 96-80 Investment Portfolio Report for Third Quarter, FY
1995-1996 (10 minutes)
. .
2.' PS 96-24 Removal of Platting Requirement - fòr Lots 1 and
. 2, Block 1, Antinone Addition (Agenda-Item No.
14) (5 minutes)
3.: GN 96-85 Local Law Enforcement Block.Grant - Reso1ution
No. 96-47(Agenda Item No. 16):(5 minutes)'
4. GN 96-86 Nomination to Fill a Vacancy on the Tarrant
Appraisal Board of mreators- Resolution No. 00:-
49 (Agenda Item No. 17)(5 m¡"utes)
5. PU 96-57 Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way for Rumfield
Road Street and Drainage Improvements, Phase
I (Agenda Item No. 19) (5 minutes)
, ~~. '.'"t .
, . " -- ~. . . ::\ - ..
,
6. Adjournment-7:20p.m. .
... .. .... . . . ~- . t . '"
,.
. ·Closed due to subject ma'Ueras providèd by the OpehMêeilitgs Law. If any actiOl4' is
contërnplated, it will be t'aken in op'eri'session.
·
.
For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills Community Center in the Municipal
Court Room, 6720 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the
Agenda for discussion and/or action.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 22, 1996
1. Items marked with an * are on the consent agenda and will be voted on in one motion
unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion.
2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items
listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the
Open Meetings Act.
3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance
should contact the City Secretary's office at 581-5502 two working days prior to the meeting
so that appropriate arrangements can be made.
.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting
July 8, 1996
5. Presentations by Boards &
Commissions
a. Investment Committee Minutes
6. Presentation of "Yard of the Month"
Awards
Page 2
e
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
7. Presentation of "Landscape of the
Month" Award
8. Presentation of "Keep Texas
Beautiful" Award
9. IR 96-81 Special Presentation - Distinguished
Budget Presentation Award for Fiscal
Year 1995-96
10. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent
Agenda
11. Consent Agenda Item(s) Indicated by
Asterisk (16,18,19,20,21 and 22)
12. PZ 96-16 Public Hearing to Consider the
Request of Vernon Smith to Rezone
a Portion of Lot 2R, Block 2, Culp
Addition, from 1-2 Medium Industrial
to a Planned Development for Single
Family Residential. (Generally
Located on Tradonna Lane)
Ordinance No. 2134
13. PS 96-18 Reconsideration of the Request of
Mark and Hsiang-Lan Wood for Final
Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Wood
Addition (Located in the 7900 block
of Smithfield Road)
e
e
Page 3
.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
14. PS 96-24 Removal of Platting Requirement -
for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Antinone
Addition
15. PS 96-28 Public Hearing to Consider Revisions
to the Master Thoroughfare Plan
Regarding Rumfield Road Between
Davis Boulevard and Spring Oak
Drive. - Ordinance No. 2135
*16. GN 96-85 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant -
Resolution No. 96-47
17. GN 96-86 Nomination to Fill a Vacancy on the
Tarrant Appraisal Board of Directors -
Resolution No. 96-49
*18. GN 96-87 Authorizing Signature to Interlocal
Agreement on Auto Theft Task Force
- Resolution No. 96-50
*19. PU 96-57 Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way
for Rumfield Road Street and
Drainage Improvements, Phase I
*20. PU 96-58 Authorization to Purchase Fuel on
"Spot Market Basis"
.
e
Page 4
e
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
*21. PW 96-36 Approve Amended Interlocal
Agreement concerning North Tarrant
Parkway (Wilson Lane) Right-of-Way
Dedication and Drainage
Improvements between City of North
Richland Hills and City of Keller -
Resolution No. 96-48
*22. PAY 96-06 Approve Final Pay Estimate NO.5 in
the Amount of $128,002.55 to Austin
Bridge & Road Co. Inc., for
Hightower Drive, Section "A 1" Paving
& Drainage Improvements
23. Citizens Presentation
24. Adjournment
e
roS1£D
í}-¡q.qip
Date
f.ùu a·ill
Time
.
City Secretat'Y
By O? KlMJ-~
CITY OF N*RTH RICHLAND HILLS
e Office of the City Secretary
July 19, 1996
ITEM ADDED TO THE JULY 22,1996 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA:
21a. PW 96-37 Interlocal Agreement for Rumfield Road, Phase I
.
PO~D
..~~.".(2:J=q~~~
DIrt~
~l:4{~m~_~
City Sêcletary
B,~
.
P.O. Box 820609 * North Richland Hills, Texas * 76182-0609 USA
7301 Northeast Loop 820 * 817-581-5502 * FAX 817-581-5516
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. 96-79
+
Date: July 22, 1996
Subject: Lawsuit involving the failure of the coating on the Starnes Elevated
Storage Tank (No. 15969-95 in the 17th District Court)
You will recall that the coating installed by A & J Industrial Coating, Inc. failed in
1995. This was within the two year maintenance period. The bonding company
was bankrupt so we sued the principal when it failed to live up to its bond
requirements. This was a loss that was probably in excess of $100,000.
After getting service of process on the principal, AI Vaituulala, his company
agreed to recoat the tank. Due to the financial condition of the defendant, it was
doubtful if a judgment against it could have been collected.
The recoating job was completed several months ago and our inspections reveal
that it is not failing. The Public Works Department is keeping close watch on
that project.
The reason for this memo is that the District Court case can't be kept alive
forever. We do not want to have the case dismissed until we can ascertain that
the recoating job is adequate. We are only going to be able to watch it for about
six more months because the Court has the case scheduled again for dismissal.
The next dismissal date is December 10, 1996. I may be able to get one more
six months extension, but there are no guarantees. We will continue to monitor
the situation and keep the ca open as long as possible.
Rex McEntire
City Attorney
ISSUED BYTHE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHL.
e
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
N IR 96-80
o.
~ Date:
~ Subject:
July 22, 1996
Investment Portfolio Report for Third Quarter, FY 1995-1996
This informal report to Council is a quarterly report on all investment activity for the third
quarter of Fiscal Year 1995-1996. The report has been designed to comply with the
reporting and disclosure requirements of the Public Funds Investment Act of 1995.
The City earned approximately $435,000 in interest income during the third quarter of the
fiscal year with an average portfolio balance of $35 million. The return on investment (ROI)
at the end of the quarter was 5.24%. The ROI by month is shown on Table A. This return
represents interest earnings after transaction, safekeeping, and other banking costs have
been subtracted. As a comparison, the three-month T-Bill rate as of June 30 was 5.21 %.
The T -Bill rate indicates the interest rate that would be earned if the total portfolio was
invested in three month treasury securities on that date. The portfolio's weighted average
maturity (WAM) at June 30, 1996 was 63.52 days. The WAM indicates the average number
of days before the portfolio matures. The maximum average maturity allowed under the
investment policy is 365 days. In general, a shorter WAM indicates that more funds are
available for payment of current expenses, while less interest will be earned.
e
Table B shows the change in portfolio structure for the quarter. The total funds invested
increased by almost $6.5 million, due to the receipt of $7 million in bond funds. The City has
continued to reduce its investment in Texpool by investing a larger percentage of its portfolio
in T-Bills and agencies and by investing in LOGIC, a private investment pool with rates and
structure similar to Texpool.
Table C details the City's current investments by investment account as of July 1, 1996.
Purchase price indicates the amount paid to acquire the security. The column titled book
value shows the purchase cost of the securities plus interest earned to date. The column
titled market value indicates the price the City would have received if the investments were
sold for cash on July 1. The difference between book value and market value shows the
City's unrealized gain or loss on the securities at that date. The gain or loss is referred to as
unrealized because the City did not sell investments on that date. The only time a gain or loss
is recognized is when the security is sold before maturity. If a security is held until it matures
the gain or loss to the City is $0.
Proceeds from various bond sales are invested separately from the City's consolidated
investment account, and are shown separately on Table C. Several bond accounts have
projects nearing completion by the end of the fiscal year. As these funds are expended, and
no excess funds are available for investment, the accounts will drop off of the investment
report. Similarly, investment accounts for the proceeds from the 1996 bond sales have been
added for this report.
e
_ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
.
.
,
¡-
Table D is a listing of all securities purchased by the City during the year that have matured
or have been sold. The City no longer possesses these securities, but has used the
proceeds from them to purchase the current investments listed in Table C or to finance
operating and capital expenditures.
Table E presents the City's investment activity among the City's approved brokers for the
quarter. All securities are purchased on a competitive bid basis with bids from at least three
approved brokers. Table E shows the dollar value of the transactions with each broker.
While the City has money deposited in NationsBank and with Texpool and LOGIC, no funds
are held by the Brokers. As part of its depository agreement with the City, NationsBank acts
as a safekeeping agent for the City. Payments for securities are not released until the
security is delivered to NationsBank. This allows the City to obtain the best price for an
investment from a wide selection of brokers without the danger of the City losing the principal
if a broker goes out of business.
Also attached to this report are a Glossary of investment terms and definitions and a
Certification signed by the investment committee indicating their agreement with this report
and its compliance to the provisions of the Public Funds Investment Act and the City's
Investment Policy.
Respectfully submitted, I
patDt z#1
Finance Director
Attachments
"
CERTIFICATION
e This, report has been examined and approved by the Investment Committee of the City of
North Richland Hills. Information presented in this report to the City Council represents an
accurate description of the City's investment activity for the third quarter of the 1995-1996
fiscal year. This report meets all reporting requirements specified by the Public Funds
Investment Act of 1995 and the Investment Policy of the City of North Richland Hills.
!JtpI/
Finance Director
~~
Assistant City Manager
~~~
Debbie Durko
Budget Coordinator
()ìo bÌð J 0JttWu
Jackie Theriot
Accounting Manager
e
~~
Bret Starr
Accountant
e
e
e
e
GLOSSARY
Agencies: Are organizations formed by the Federal Government but not directly controlled
by the Government. Each agency is authorized to issue its own securities which are
comparable to Treasury Notes, Bills, and Bonds.
Book Value: The value of a security as stated in the City's general ledger.
Certificate of Deposit: a time deposit issued by a bank that guarantees a specified interest
rate for a specified time for the amount of the certificate.
Discount Notes: Short-term securities that are sold at a discounted price and redeemed at
full value upon maturity. The difference between the purchase price and maturity value is the
investment's interest income.
FFCB: (Federal Farm Credit Bank) a U. S. Government Agency that issues securities.
FHLB: (Federal Home Loan Bank) aU. S. Government Agency that issues securities.
FHLMC: (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Freddie Mac) aU. S. Government
Agency that issues securities.
FNMA: (Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae) a U. S. Government Agency
that issues securities.
LOGIC: (Local Government Investment Cooperative) a privately managed investment pool
administered by Southwest Securities with a structure similar to Texpool.
Market Value: The value of a security if it was sold for cash at a given date.
Return on Investment (ROI): The amount of money earned on a given amount of
investments for a specified period of time.
Texpool: An investment pool administered by the State Treasury. Funds from political
subdivisions of Texas are deposited with Texpool and invested as a single portfolio to earn
higher levels of interest income.
Weighted Average Maturity (WAM): A measure of the average length until maturity for the
investment portfolio based on the number of days until maturity for each investment weighted
by the dollar value of each investment.
TABLE A
e CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
INTEREST INCOME SUMMARY
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,1996
AVERAGE RETURN
MONTH TOTAL FUNDS INTEREST ON
ENDING INVESTMENTS AVAILABLE INCOME INVESTMENT
September 30 $31,518,739
October 31 33,331,335 $32,425,037 $158,142 5.76%
November 30 32,266,542 32,798,939 153,938 5.73%
December 31 34,597,361 33,431,952 164,890 5.82%
January 31 36,443,344 35,520,352 165,026 5.49%
February 29 32,317,115 34,380,229 140,611 5.16%
March 31 32,993,785 32,655,450 143,608 5.19%
e April 30 32,770,215 32,882,000 137,866 5.12%
May 31 33,888,465 33,329,340 147,540 5.23%
June 30 35,542,179 34,715,322 149,081 5.24%
e
e
(()
e~
(()
~
e
Zc.o
00'>
--
~LO
- 0'>
000'>
0....
00 a.. 0::
....J::2:«
....Jaw
I°>-
oo....J
Z::::¡«
«00
....Ju.OO
I~U.
00::u.
0::00
I a.. 0::
~~W
O::Z~
OW 0::
z::2:«
~:J
u.ooO
owo
>->0::
~Z-
OZ~
wW
(9I
Z~
«0::
IO
0U.
c
o
:E
enc.o
00'>
c.-
EO
o£2
oc.o
-
.Q 0
- en
.E«
t
o
a..
c
o
;+:'
enc.o
00'>
c.-
E....
0£2
O('t)
-
.Q 0
- en
.E«
t
o
a..
o
('t')
0)
U)
Q)
õ
z
U
U)
Õ
~
c
Q)
;¡
......
o
0)
ro
('t')
E.9-
()
'6>
o
...J
*'
<0
,g¡
ë5
¡.:.
*'
o
....
U)
Q)
õ
z
N
ex::>
o
~
ex::>
LO
Ñ
('t')
ER-
õ
o
a.
x
Q)
I-
';f!.
....
<0
e
e~
CD
~
e
cn
cnW
....I~
=:c
:Co
co:::cø
Z~Ø)
ctD..Ø)
.J...~
:C2~
5:!W>
o::::E....I
:c"'~
...cn""')
o:::WLL
0S;0
Z-cn
LLLLct
00
~~
-...
Ow
C
0_
- 'C:
"0::1
--
0) C'a
5=::?!
>-
:eO)
::I.=!
-C'a
C'a>
::?!
"OUI
0) UI
NO
=....1
C'a-
O).!:
... C'a
§e>
-
0) 0)
~.=!
C'aC'a
::?!>
~O)
o ::I
0-
m~
0)
~8
.r::. 'C:
eo..
::I
a..
0_
.... .C:
UI ::I
>--
C'a C'a
a::?!
>-
-
'C: 0)
::1-
_C'a
C'aO
~
0)
UI
C'a 0)
.c-
o C'a
5°
a..
c:
~
'C:
o
UI
0)
°
#.#.#.#.#.#.#.#.#.#.#.#.#.#.#.#.
('I)NI/)('I)('I)'O:t I/)r--O('l) 'O:t('l)N CON I/)
NN('I)('I)......('I)N('I)'O:t'O:t'O:t'O:tCOI.O'O:t('l)
ujujujujujujujujujujujujujujujuj
......COOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
'O:t('l)OOOOOI/)OOI/)OOOOO
or--OOOOOCOOO('l)OOOOO
Ña:iòòòariòariòò"":òòòòò
mCOOOOCOONOONOOOOO
"t '"': q q 0_ q qo. o_q q q 0_ 0.0_ 0_
10"1,--,--,--,--,--,--,-,--,.-,.-,.-,.-,.-,--
ER-
...-.. ,.-.. ......... ............................................. ..........
or--O('l)OI/)('I)r--l/)cor--com'O:tm'O:t
ER-......cocoml/)co......COO('l)('I)NOOr--
N -......cor--mI/)Nr---N'O:tON
'-' ... ... -'-''-'''' ... ... ...
~.....;: ~ N~
-
......mN'O:t('l)o......com'O:tOOI/)ON'O:t
'O:t......N......NI/) NCOCOOOONOCOCO
Ol/)mCOmNCOCOONO'O:tI/)N('I)r--
Ñ a:i a:i cD ~ ~ ò m ~ N- Ò CO· 1.0- ~ ~ ~
mcommmr--mmcocoor--r--r--r--co
N.....mmmommmmommmmm
ariÑ ....: ....:
ER-
.....CONr--('I)I/)COI/)'O:tNr--COCOCO('l)m
'O:t('l)'O:tm('l)ol/)o('l).....('I)('I)mmr--('I)
o r--co cor--..... OCOCO'O:t r--'O:tN r--('I) 0
Ñ CO- a:i cD ~ ari m ....: ~ Ñ ari CO- ari ('1)- Ñ ari
mcommmr--co.....cocoor--r--r--r--co
N.....mmmomommommmmm
ariÑ ....:....: ....:
ER-
.....COOCOmNCO('l).....NOCO.....OCOO
'O:t ('I)N Nr--CO COCO OCO CO..... 0 0..... I/)
or--.....mONr--oor--OI/)CONr--N
Ña:i....:aria:iò~m~~ò~Ñ~òm
mCOCO CO CO CO r--mr--r--or--r--r--co'O:t
N.....mmmommmmommmmm
ariÑ ....: ....:
ER-
~~ ('O)CO'O:tCONr--NCOmI/)CONCO
ZZCON('I)cor--m~~~;!~~~~
E
0)
...
~~mcoco°r--('I)CONCO('l)('I)O('l)O
ZZcomco~~~~~~~~~~~
CO CO CO CO CO CO COCO CO CO CO cor--r--
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm
~~Oi~ã5(;)¡:::;::ëõ;::~¡:::(;)~Oiëõ
ZZONOO.....O.....M.....N.....NOO
¡:::¡:::ã5OiOiõõõ;::;::è';¡è';¡;::(;)
00000...................................00
UlUICOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO
::I::Immmmmmmmmmmmmm
oo--......................................................~-............................................
'C: 'C: ..... r-- 'O:t r-- 'O:t ..... ..... N 0 co ('I) r-- ..... .....
cacu::::!::~C:!~:!::~Q~~:!::~:!:::!::
»~~~~~~~~~~88~~
Q.
en
:)
o
CO NCOI/) ('I)'O:t r--N CO ('1)1/) Nml/)
g ~~~ifn3~~~Q.m...J~~:3~~
o COCO'O:tNCO.....CON CO'O:tCO'O:t'O:t
·omcom.....co.....co.....'O:tcococomm
..........('1) I/) r--('I) 1/)('1) 1/)('1) CO I/) ('I) I/)r--r--
_.....,('I)('I)N('I)('I)('I)('I)('I)('I)('I)('I)('I)NN
c.....-N,.-,.-,--,.-,.-,--,.-,.-,.-,.-,.-,.-,.-,.-
::1""''''''('1) ('I)m('l) ('1)('1) ('1)('1) ('I) ('1)('1) ('I)m m
o 0)
00 -0) 0)0) 0) 0) 0)
0_ _~ _0)_
<{ ZO ÕÕ 00 0-0
"0 oZ zZ Zz Z~Z
~ .!!!g og~go~gog
C'a 0._ UI._ 0'- UI 0._ UI.-
;gõ 00 ë50Z0j5Z0ë50
~~o~<{-m<{m~m~<{m<{--
>< ·õ...J ~ CD 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~::?!...J::?! CD m
OO)o:r:Z,~Z~Z~ZZ:r:ZI .
1-...J~~I-~~~~~~u.~~1-1-
co
r--
m
co
m
I/)
......
N
ER-
,-..
r--
.....
<"t
r--
.....
ER-
-
N
N
('I)
r--
'O:t
('I)
.....
N
ER-
o
'O:t
I/)
'O:t
~
.....
N
ER-
('I)
N
.....
.....
('I)
<"t
.....
N
ER-
0)
o
c:
C'a
tü
m
UI
-
c:
0)
E
en
0)
>
c:
"0
0)
-
C'a
:s!
õ
UI
c:
o
o
#.#.#.#.#.
('I)'O:tmco('l)
N'O:tCOr--CO
ujujar;ar;uj
NOOOON
001.0001/)
NO moo......
ariòcDòòÑ
OONOO('l)
'"': 0_ q q q '"':
~....................~
NOOOCOCO
00 1/)0 ('I)CX)
NO COO ('1)('1)
1/)- a:i a:i ~ ~ m
ocomco'O:tm
,",:mmmmm_
N I/)
ER- ER-
Nr--r--mOI/)
01/) I/) CO 00
NCO COCO ml/)
arir---Ñò~....:
OCOOCO'O:tO
.....moo>o>o
~.....- ~
NomNCO.....
o'O:tcor--com
NommN'O:t
aricDòm~cD
OCO 01/) 'O:tm
.....mOmmm
Ñ"": ari
ER- ER-
~'O:tcoco08
ZCX)U')I/)COC:
.....N('I)C'a
tü
m
UI
"0
c:
~1I)"""N'O:tO
zm~~~m
d
e>
COcor--r--co
.......mmmmm
..........................................0)
_('I)'O:t'O:tCD.....
ZNO.....N
-~--UI
mN('I)CO_
O.....OO~
E
UlCOCOCDCD~
g~~~~>
'C: 0 0 U') r-- c:
C'a~~~~-
>COCDCDCD
0000
I/)
0~.....'O:t
g~g~~
-9~'O:t~a';
COI/)CD('I)r--
m('l)('I)('I)N
om....................
o.....('I)('I)('I)m
<{
"0 ~ 0)
c: 0 Õ
S ~O)Z
. UI - 0
o .- 0 UI
cjõOZj5
O<{«m_
CD ~~::?!...J=
mO)ZZ:r:~
.....I-~~~I-
~
o
('I)
C'!
II)
N
o
N
II)
('I)
.....
.....
ER-
o
ER-
N
o
"t
I/)
('I)
.....
.....
ER-
N
o
N
ari
('I)
.....
.....
ER-
N
o
<"t
U')
('I)
.....
.....
ER-
~
Z
~
Z
~
Z
UI
::I
o
'C:
C'a
>
e
e~
m
<
~
e
(I)
(l)W
..J(I)
..J<
-J:
:1:0
cO::U)
Z=>en
so-en
:I:~~
OZ....
-~>
D::c:;..J
:I:~:J
~(I),
o::Wu.
0$;0
Z-(I)
u.u.<
00
~~
-~
Ow
c
0_
- 'C
'C:::s
--
Q) CU
>=~
>-
=EQ)
:::s.2
_CU
CU>
~
'CII)
Q) II)
N 0
:: -J
CU-
Q).~
....CU
5C>
-
Q) Q)
.:.:.:::s
....-
~~
.:.:.Q)
o :::s
0-
m~
Q)
~8
'fi 'C
5 a..
a..
0_
..., "¡::
I/) :::s
>--
CUCU
o~
>-
-
'C Q)
:::s-
_cu
cuO
~
Q)
II)
CUQ)
.s::-
e~
:::s
a..
*'*'
('t)"<t
NO
U)U)
NON
COO CO
"<to"<t
cicici
I'- 0 I'-
"<to"<t
"':"':Ñ
~ ~
--
OeDeD
~ I'- I'-
eDeD
-~
-
N.....N
COeD"<t
"<teD.....
ci"':Ñ
I'- 0) <0
"<t 0) "<t
...: Ñ
~ ~
NI'-CO
CO ('t) .....
"<t('t)CO
ciÑÑ
1'-0) CO
"<to)"<t
...: Ñ
~ ~
N ..... ('t)
CO ('t) .....
"<t U') 0
ci ar) CO·
I'- I'- "<t
"<t 0) "<t
...: Ñ
~ ~
E
Q)
I-
Q)
~I'-(,)
zU')æ
(ij
m
II)
'C
«Nc
-COO
z.....m
q
c>
COU')
«~m
-I'-.....
z~1/)
CO _
oc
Q)
E
iñ
I/) CO Q)
:::s 0) >
0- C
0C I'- _
cu~
>0
a..
(I)
:)
()
('t)
OeD
00
-9~
CU')('t)
0) ('t)
0) .....
(,).....('t)
«
'C Q)
C -
o 0
m z
(,)
o .!!!
'-0
c>gm
U') o.-J
O)xI
~~lL
C
o
:;::;
·C
(,)
II)
Q)
o
o
o
_0
C I
:::s('t)
00)
(,)0)
(,).....
'C
C
o
m
o
cig
('t)o.
O)X
Q)
.....1-
~
o
('t)
C'!
U')
o
('t)
('t)
..¡
o
eD.
.....
~
o
~
o
('t)
('t)
"<t
o
eD.
.....
~
o
('t)
('t)
"<t
o
CO.
.....
~
o
('t)
('t)
"<t
o
~
.....
~
~
z
~
z
~
z
I/)
:::s
o
'C
cu
>
*'
('t)
N
U')
o
N
U')
rti
;¡
o
~
o
N
U')
rti
;¡
o
N
U')
CO
;¡
o
N
U')
rti
;¡
~
z
~
z
~
z
I/)
:::s
o
'C
cu
>
o
o
_0
C I
:::s8
§~
«
~
o
('t)
C'!
U')
CO
U')
"<t
('t)
o.
.....
~
o
~
CO
U')
.....
"<t
('t)
q
.....
~
co
U')
.....
"<t
('t)
q
.....
~
CO
Ii)
.....
"<t
('t)
q
.....
~
~
z
~
z
~
z
I/)
:::s
o
'C
cu
>
õ
8.
X
Q)
I-
o
o
o
- I
Cl'-
:::SO
01'-
gco
«
'C
C
~
o
('t)
C'!
U')
eD
('t)
CO
N
U')
~
o
~
CO
('t)
CO
Ñ
U')
~
eD
('t)
CO
N
U')
~
CO
('t)
~
N
U')
~
~
z
~
z
~
z
II)
:::s
o
'C
cu
>
.....
.....
.....
- I
CO)
:::Sco
80)
(,).....
'C
C
o
m
o
c>õ
o
<»0.
coX
<»Q)
.....1-
~
o
('t)
N
U')
U')
N
N
N
.....
~
o
~
U')
N
N..
N
.....
~
U')
N
N..
N
.....
~
U')
N
N..
N
.....
~
~
z
~
z
~
z
I/)
:::s
o
'C
cu
>
~
o
('t)
C'!
U')
LO
U')
N
~
('t)
~
o
~
U')
U')
N..
I'-
('t)
~
U')
U')
N..
I'-
('t)
~
LO
U')
N
1'--
('t)
~
~
z
~
z
~
z
I/)
:::s
o
'C
cu
>
~
o
('t)
C'!
LO
I'-
CO
('t)
ct"i
o
;¡
o
~
I'-
CO
('t)
('t)
o
;¡
I'-
CO
('t)
('t)
o
;¡
I'-
CO
~
('t)
o
;¡
~
z
~
z
~
z
II)
:::s
o
'C
~
o
o
o
I
('t)
-~
:::s.....
o
«
Q)
(,)
.~
Q)-
wg
150.
Q) X
o~
~
o
('t)
C'!
LO
N
N
('t)
I'-
.....
N
~
o
~
N
N
('t)
I'-
.....
N
~
N
N
~
I'-
.....
N
~
N
N
('t).
.....
.....
N
~
~
z
~
z
~
z
I/)
:::s
o
'C
cu
>
~
o
('t)
C'!
LO
00
eD
N..
"<t
('t)
('t)
.....
~
o
~
00
CO
N..
"<t
('t)
('t)
.....
~
00
CO
N..
"<t
('t)
('t)
.....
~
CO
co
N..
"<t
('t)
('t).
.....
~
~
z
~
z
~
z
II)
:::s
o
'C
cu
>
o
o
o
:::s~
N
N
õ
o
a.
X
CUQ)
a.. I-
0_ ~ ~ ~ ~
-"¡:: 0 0 0 0
"C ~ M M M M
-- C'! C'! C\I C\I
Q) C'II
e >=~ It) It) It) It)
CO M 0 r-- <»
<» CO r-- v CO
~Q) r-- M CO ...- C\I
'- ~ ...- ,..: 0 M V
~- C\I It) 0 M <»
_C'II r-- ~ C\I CO C\I
C'II> ~ ~ ~
~ ...- <»
~ M
~
"C(I) 0 0 0 0 0
Q) (I) ~ ~ ~ ~ ...-
N 0 0
=...J 0
C'II-
Q).~ C\I
'-C'II ~
5C>
CO M 0 r-- 0
<» CO r-- v M
- r-- M CO ...- It)
Q) Q) ,..: 0 c<i
~~ ...- .....
'- - C\I It) 0 M 0
C'IIC'II r-- CO. C\I ~ <»
~> ~ ..... ~ CO
~ M
~
CO M 0 r-- 0
<» CO r-- v v
.:.J!.Q) r-- M. CO ..... LO
o ~ ..... r-- 0 M .....
0- C\I LO 0 M C\I
U) m~ r-- ~ C\I CO <»
U)W ~ ..... ~ ~ CO
...JU) ~ M
...Jc( ~
-:I: CO M 0 r-- LO
:I: ° Q) <» CO r-- v 0
CQ:cø ~8 r-- M CO ..... M
2~cn ..- ,..: 0 c<i CO
jQ.cn £ 'C: C\I LO 0 M CO
Sa.. r-- CO. C\I ~ r--
:J:~~ ~ ..... ~ CO
e~ OZ.... a.. ~ M
_W> ~
Q::!:...J
m :I:~~ .9ï::
c( ~U), ~ ~ ~ ~ èri
~ n::WLL (I) ~ -
>-- Z Z Z Z ¡::
O~O C'IIC'II Q)
2-(1) O~ E
LLLLc( 1;)
00 Q)
E >
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡::
Q) Z Z z ëü
-~ ..... -
Ow 0
C .....
>-
tQ) ~ ~ ~ ~
~- ~
_C'II
C'IIO Z Z Z Z (I) LO
~ >- ~
C'II
C <»
<»
C\I
Q) (I) (I) (I) (I) ~
(I) M
C'II Q) ~ ~ ~ ~
J:: - 0 0 0 0 CO
oC'll L: .¡:: .¡:: .¡::
SO C'II C'II C'II C'II
a.. > > > >
Q)
~
- ~
¡:: ~
~<» C\I
§~ C\I >- 0
a.. C\I - 0
'C: m
ëij . ~
«v ..... .....
0 -
::> <» C'II 0
"C <» CO
U ¡:: ..... CO ~ ~
~ Q) C'II
0 C>
8 ~ (I)
e « Q) C'II
> Q)
¡:: (I) Q) « ~
0 ~ I!? "C C'II
.. C'II- a..g ~- Q) >
a.. 0 00 - -
.¡:: 0 UO J:: Q)
0 va. LOa. .....a. C> ~
(I) <»)( <»)( -)( 'ã)
Q) <»(1) <»(1) o (I) ~ C'II
0 .......... ...-..... ø..... ~
e
c
W
..J
m
<t
I-
(/)
I-
Z
W
(/)~
..J(/)co
::!wen
Z>en
CZ~
Zc:R
j..Jen
ZO:
u(/)"'"
ã:~Li5
ZO>
I-c..J
~W<t
O~u
Z~(/)
u.1-¡¡:
O~~
>u.0
!:::Ou.
u..J
~
W
C
e
0__
~ ï:::::
'C::3
.~ ëU
>~
~Q)
.... ::3
::3-
-- CU
CU>
~
'C UI
Q) UI
N 0
= -.I
CU-'
Q).£
.... CU
§~
Q)Q)
~.2
CU CU
~>
~ Q)
o ::3
0-
aJ~
Q)
UI
CU Q)
..c:: .g
~a..
::3
a..
0__
- 'C
UI ::3
>--
CU CU
O~
>-
;¡:Q)
::3-
_CU
CUD
~
Q)
UI
CU Q)
..c:: -
o CU
:;0
a..
a..
en
::::>
0
e c
0
..
.¡::
0
UI
Q)
0
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~omN~ON~~~O~~~~
~~~~~~IDID~~ID~IDO~O~N~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0000000000000000000
0000000000000000000
0000000000000000000
ååååmåååååååååååååå
oooomooooooOOOOOOOO
~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~..-..-..- ..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-.........-..-
~
0000000000000000000
~
0000000000000000000
0000000000000000000
0000000000000000000
ååååmåååååååååååååå
oooomooooooOOOOOOOO
~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
..-..-..-..- ..-..-,......-........................................,.........
~
0000000000000000000
0000000000000000000
0000000000000000000
ååååmåååååååååååååå
oooomoooooooooooooo
~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.................... .....................................,....,....,..........................
~
O~O~O~~~ON~~~mID~~O~
~mNOO~~NO~~IDO~~N~m~
~~m~o~~~N~N~~IDO~O~~
~~~~m~~Ñ~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
mmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmm
~
0000000000000000000
E
Q)
I-
N~~~~ID~NIDN~~~~mN~NN
mmmmmm~~mm~~~m~~mmm
~~~~~IDIDIDIDIDIDIDIDIDIDIDIDIDID
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
.................................................................................................................................................................
O~NIDIDNID~IDID~~~N~~O~~
NNO~NO~OO~~N~O~N~~N
..................................................................................................................................................................
OO~~N~~NNN~~~~~~~IDID
~~~~~OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
~~~~~~~~~~~ID~IDIDIDIDIDID
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
O~M~~OOOMN~ONM~WW~M~
NNO~NNNOO~NONO~ON~N
.............................................................................................................................................................
~~~~mmO~~~N~ON~NN~~
000000~0~~~0~000000
m~~ID ~~~~~~~>~~~O~~O
~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~X~~
ID~~~ ~ID~~IDIDID~~~~~~~
m~~~ ~mm~mmm~m~~~~~
~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_~~~~~~~N~~~~~N~~~~~
c...................-m....................................................................................
~~~~~~~m~~~~~m~~~~~
8 Q) Q) Q) Q) Q)
OÕQ)~~ Q)Õ Q)ÕÕÕQ) Q)Q)~~~
~ZõOO õZ õZZZ-o ---000
'COZZZ Zo Zoooz ~~zzz
Q) UI 0 0 UI UI UI UI 000
ëUð ~.~.~ ~ð ~ððð ~ ~ ~.~.~.~
'C -00 - - - --000
=00 00 00000 00
£~aJ~~ aJ~=aJ~~~aJ=aJaJ~~~
C-.l-.l~~o-.l-.lm-.l-.l-.l-.l-.lm-.l-.l~~~
OIIZZ II.IIIII,IIZZZ
0u.u.u.u.0u.u.1-u.u.u.u.u.1-u.u.u.u.u.
~~~~~~~
~o~o~~~
~~~~IDID~
~~~~~~~
0000000
0000000
0000000
ååååååå
0000000
0000000
- - - - - - -
................................-..-
~
0000000
~
0000000
0000000
0000000
ååååååå
0000000
o~~o~o~o~o~o~
...... ,.... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
~
0000000
0000000
0000000
ååååååå
0000000
0000000
- - - - - - -
,.... ...... ...... ,...... ...... ,.... ......
~
~IDmN~N~
~m~~mmID
~mN~~~O
~~~~~~~~~-
~~~~~~~
mmmmmmm
~
0000000
ID~N~N~~
mm~~m~~
~~~IDIDIDID
mmmmmmm
........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ --
~~~N~~O
~NNNNON
........ ....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........
O~N~N~ID
~~~oooo
~~~~~~~
mmmmmmm
.......... ........ ....... ......... ........ .......... ..........
~~~~~~~
NNNNNON
........ ......... ........ ........ .......... ........ ........
~~~~~~N
oooo~~~
O~~""tID""t~
D::::::>aJooo.,
za..D::enl-»
ID~~~IDID~
Cm~~~mm~
~~~~~~~
O~~~~~~~
0..............-..-..................
~~~~~~~
~Q) Q)Q)
'CÕQ)~Q)ÕÕ~
ðZõoõzzo
aJOZZZOOZ
.~ 0 ~ 0 .~ .~ ~
o 0 UI .- UI 0 0 .-
~oðOðooO
~~aJ~aJ~~~
-.I-.I~-.I-.I-.I~
mIIZIIIZ
~u.u.u.u.u.u.u.
.
. .
e
e
LU
LU
-I
CD
~
e
0:: CD
wO>
~iì5
00>
o::~
COo::
>-«
COw
w>-
Z..J
0«
-U
I-W
0-
«u.
Wu.
Zo
~o::
I-W
1-1-
zo::
W«
~:J
1-0
wO
Wo::
>-
ZI
-I-
"C
....
oE
c:
ctI
....
CD
>.
.c
C/IC/I
0) .21
.- ....
'E<.9
:J
()
0)
U)
"E
oEC/I
=c:
<.90
E
E
èi5
-
'-.~
O)u,
.c
.c
~
0)
c:
.¡¡¡
a.. 13 ...
~.!
-Ins
'eQ)
C/I 0) C
.!!!:E ì:::
=: Q)
3 ~
() 0
~ ...
ÏiiC/lQ)
ëñ.~
:g'E
uB
0)
U)
¡¡¡
SE
.- 0)
g-õ
u2
()a..
c:
ctI
CD
C/IC/I
c:0)
0;
:.woe:
ctI:J
z~
U)
en
iií(j
0) .
~:E
'5
o
U)
-
~
ü:
<0
I()
'V
(")
N
.....
o
SU0!ll!V\I
!quaw¡saAUI
e
e
e
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - JULY 8, 1996 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting to order July 8, 1996 at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Tommy Brown
Lyle E. Welch
Mark Wood
JoAnn Johnson
Don Phifer
Byron Sibbet
Mayor
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilman
Staff:
C.A. Sanford
Randy Shiflet
Larry Cunningham
Patricia Hutson
Rex McEntire
Greg Dickens
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
City Engineer
Absent:
Mack Garvin Mayor Pro Tern
Linda Spurlock Sansoucie Councilwoman
2.
INVOCATION
Councilman Wood gave the invocation.
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Troop 502 led the Pledge of Allegiance.
City Council Minutes
July 8, 1996
Page 2
e
4.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JUNE 24, 1996
APPROVED
Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Phifer, to approve the
minutes of the June 24, 1996 Council meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
5.
PRESENTA TIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. TEEN COURT BOARD MINUTES
B. PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MINUTES
No action necessary.
6.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
e Mayor Brown removed Agenda Items No. 10 and 15 from the Consent Agenda.
7.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(9,11,13,14,16,17,18,19,20,21,22 & 24)
APPROVED
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve the
Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 5-0.
8.
PS 96-18 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF PS 96-18
Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to reconsider
PS 96-18 at the July 24, 1996 City Council meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
e
City Council Minutes
July 8, 1996
Page 3
e
*9.
PS 96-22 REQUEST OF EDDIE FUCHS, TR BENNETT AND
BILL PRIVETT FOR REPLA T OF LOTS 1 AND 10, BLOCK 3;
AND LOT 4R, BLOCK C, HEWITT ESTATES
(LOCATED IN THE 7700 BLOCK OF HEWITT STREET)
APPROVED
10.
PS 96-24 REQUEST OF RONALD ANTI NONE FOR
FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, ANTINONE ADDITION
(LOCATED AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MID CITIES
BOULEVARD AND DICK FISHER DRIVE)
APPROVED
Councilman Wood abstained from discussion and voting.
Councilman Phifer moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve PS 96-24
as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
e
Motion carried 4-0; Councilman Wood abstaining.
*11.
GN 96-80 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
FOR TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY _
RESOLUTION NO. 96-45
APPROVED
12.
GN 96-81 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
TO AMEND CIVIL SERVICE RULE 11.01 _
ORDINANCE NO. 2133
TABLED
Mr. Andy Wallace, Vice President of North Richland Hills Police Association appeared
before the Council and spoke in favor of the proposed ordinance.
Mr. Dennis York, Civil Service Commissioner, appeared before the Council
representing the Civil Service Commission. Mr. York supported the proposed
ordinance.
e
After discussion, Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Phifer, to table
Ordinance No. 2133 to the July 22, 1996 City Council meeting,
e
e
e
City Council Minutes
July 8, 1996
Page 4
Motion carried 5-0.
*13.
GN 96-82 CONTRACT WITH TARRANT COUNTY
FOR COLLECTION OF CITY PROPERTY TAXES
APPROVED
*14.
GN 96-83 BURSEY ROAD SENIOR ADULT CENTER
EXPANSION CHANGE ORDER
APPROVED
15.
GN 96-84 ORGANIZATION OF A LOCAL
HISTORY STEERING COMMITTEE -
ORDINANCE NO. 2134
APPROVED
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve GN 96-84 and
to appoint Councilwoman Johnson as Council liaison to the Committee, Councilwoman
Johnson to find people with expertise to sit on the Steering Committee.
Motion carried 5-0.
*16.
PU 96-50 AWARD BID FOR BLEACHERS
APPROVED
*17.
PU 96-51 AWARD CONTRACT FOR ANNUAL T-SHIRT SUPPLY
APPROVED
*18.
PU 96-52 AWARD ANNUAL CONTRACT
FOR AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND SUPPLIES
APPROVED
*19.
PU 96-53 AUTHORIZE CONTRACT WITH BADGER METER
APPROVED
e
e
e
City Council Minutes
July 8. 1996
Page 5
*20.
PU 96-54 AWARD BID FOR JANITORIAL EQUIPMENT
APPROVED
*21.
PU 96-55 AWARD BID FOR SOCCER GOALS
APPROVED
*22.
PU 96-56 AWARD BID FOR TREADMILL AND EXERCISE CYCLE
APPROVED
23.
PW 96-34 PROPOSED DEEP WATER WELL AT 7716 DAVIS BOULEVARD
DENIED
Mr. Ray Prodzinski, 7716 Davis Boulevard, applicant, appeared before the Council. Mr.
Prodzinski requested Council to allow him to drill a 700 foot deep well.
After discussion, Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to
deny PW 96-34.
Motion carried 4-1; Councilmen Welch, Phifer and Sibbet and Councilwoman Johnson
voting for and Councilman Wood voting against.
*24.
PW 96-35 APPROVE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH
THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE CONCERNING EMERGENCY
WATER CONNECTION -
RESOLUTION NO. 96-46
APPROVED
25.
CITIZENS PRESENTATION
Ms. Mary Prodzinski, Bob's Fishing Hole Too, 7716 Davis Boulevard, appeared before
the Council. Ms. Prowzinsky spoke in regards to the Council's denial of PW 96-35. Ms.
Prowzinsky advised the Council they needed the well for their fishing ponds. She
advised that the City water had too much chlorine in it.
e
e
e
City Council Minutes
July 8, 1996
Page 6
26.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting.
ATTEST:
Tommy Brown - Mayor
Patricia Hutson - City Secretary
e
e
It
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
MINUTES OF THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
APRIL 24, 1996
Present:
Jackie Theriot - Acting Finance Director
Debbie Durko - Budget Coordinator
Victor Jones - Utility Services Manager
Bret Starr - Accountant
Absent:
Larry J Cunningham, Assistant City Manager
Item 1:
Approve Minutes of Previous Meeting
Discussion: The minutes were approved without objection.
Action:
No action required.
Item 2:
Approval of 1 st Quarter Investment Report - Victor Jones
Discussion: Victor Jones was on vacation when the 1 st Quarter 1996 investment report
was presented. He was unable to approve the final draft at that time.
Action: Victor Jones approved the 1 st Quarter 1996 investment report.
Item 3: Summary of Investment Transactions for January - March. 1996
Discussion: Interest income for the period was $449,000. The portfolio balance as of
March 31, 1996 was $ 32,993,785. The portfolio distribution on March 31,
1996 was as follows: Texpool 61 %, Agency Discount Notes 33%, and
Treasuries 6%. Approximately $5 million was collected in property taxes and
$ 2.6 million was received in sales taxes over the quarter. Additionally, $1.8
million was received from TU Electric in franchise fees in March. These
revenues were offset by debt service payments of $4.1 million on February
15 and $974,000 on March 1. Interest rates declined sharply in January and
February, and rose through March. As rates declined, the portfolio was
invested in short term securities and Texpool. As rates increased in March,
longer term securities were purchased to increase interest income.
Action:
No action required.
e
e
e
Item 4:
Update on Market Conditions and Investment Strategy
Discussion: The consolidated investment account has been structured so that securities
will mature every other week to coincide with payroll dates. The proceeds
of the matured investment are used to cover payroll and other operating
expenses or are reinvested to the next uncovered payroll date if sufficient
funds are available to cover two weeks worth of operating expenses.
Investments are in place to meet payroll and debt service requirements
through the end of the fiscal year. A portion of the consolidated account not
required for current expenditures has been invested in one year T -bills to
lock in higher interest rates.
Proceeds from various bond sales have been invested to match the
estimated cash requirements of the CIP projects funded from those bond
sales. These maturities do not necessarily correspond to the maturity
schedule of the consolidated account. Proceeds from the 1996 bond sales
will be invested in three month intervals after current expenses are paid to
diversify the portfolio and increase investment income.
The City has $1.8 million in Water and Sewer Revenue Bond reserve
accounts and $1.2 million in Parks Development Corporation Sales Tax
Revenue Bond reserve accounts. These funds are currently deposited in
Texpool, earning overnight interest rates. Staff recommends that these
funds be separated from other investments and invested in longer term
securities to earn higher yields. These funds should not be confused with
the Interest and Sinking funds used to pay semi-annual debt service. The
reserve accounts are required to be held to the end of the bond issue as a
source of funds if the sinking funds can not pay the required debt service.
A consideration of investing the reserves in higher yielding securities is
interest rate arbitrage. If the funds were invested in tax-exempt securities,
the interest earnings would be exempt from arbitrage rebate penalties.
However, First Southwest has advised against purchasing tax exempt
investments in favor of earning higher yields and rebating arbitrage later if
necessary.
Action:
Staff will research the investment restrictions of the various bond covenants
and present a detailed investment plan at the next meeting of the Investment
Committee.
Item 5:
Discussion and Approval of New Broker/Dealers
Discussion: Since the last Investment Committee meeting, two broker/dealers have
requested to be added to the City's approved list: Apex Securities and
Gilford Securities. Both firms meet all requirements for approval as
broker/dealers, and references contacted had no problems to report
concerning either firm. With the increasing number of investment
transactions being executed by the City, it would be advisable to increase
e
Action:
Item 6:
Discussion:
e
Action:
e
the number of approved brokers. However, Apex securities has only
recently opened their institutional investment offices. Apex's recordèd only
10 total trades in the last year, while the City has had 26 trades in the last
six months. Staff recommends approval of Gilford and rejection of Apex until
a reliable history has been developed on their brokerage operations.
A motion to approve Gilford and reject Apex was made by Jackie Theriot,
seconded by Debbie Durko, and passed unanimously.
Approval of Dealer Banks as authorized Broker/Dealers
As was reported in the last Investment Committee meeting, the City was
approached by Simmons First National Bank to provide investment services
as a dealer bank. Following the last meeting, NationsBank announced the
transfer of corporate clients from NationsBanc Capital Markets to
NationsBank. NationsBank is also considered a dealer bank. The
Investment Policy does not spectfically authorize the use of dealer banks as
investment brokers. An amendment to the investment policy is required to
conduct transactions with dealer banks. Such an amendment can be
approved by the Investment Committee and will be included in the next
revision of the investment policy.
Authorization of NationsBank as an approved dealer bank is complicated by
the fact that NationsBank is also the depository for the City and safekeeps
all securities for the City. GASB Statement #3 strongly discourages
safekeeping of investments with the entity the investments are purchased
from. NationsBank has proposed providing an independent bank as a third
party safekeeper, but has not provided any details at the time of this
meeting.
First Simmons National Bank meets all the requirements of an acceptable
dealer bank. Simmons also received favorable references, including an
eleven year relationship with the City of Midland.
A motion was made to amend the Investment Policy to specifically authorize
dealer banks as acceptable investment dealers of the City, provided the
bank is regulated by the Comptroller of the Currency, is a member of the
Federal Reserve System, and is approved by the Investment Committee.
The motion was made by Victor Jones, seconded by Jackie Theriot, and
passed unanimously.
Staff was directed to refrain from investing with NationsBank until the issue
of safekeeping had been resolved. Staff was directed to contact several
banks for competitive pricing on safekeeping services.
A motion was made to accept Simmons First National Bank as a dealer for
the City's investments. The motion was made by Debbie Durko, seconded
e
e
e
by Victor Jones, and passed unanimously.
Item 7:
Status of Texpool
Discussion: Recent news reports indicated support among some legislators to abolish
T expool during the 1997 session of the State Legislature. If such a measure
is approved, the earliest date for closing Texpool would be September 1997.
Staff brought this item to the attention of the Committee to make them aware
of possible changes in the City's investment options. To prevent any
problems that could occur with a "run" on Texpool, staff will lower the amount
of funds invested in Texpool from 60% to between 25-30% of the City's
portfolio.
Action: Staff will monitor this situation and advise the Investment Committee if any
action is necessary in the future.
~
It
.
e
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS
JULY 11, 1996 - 7:30 p.m.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Vice-Chairman Richard Davis at 7:30 p.m.
2.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT
Vice-Chairman
P&Z Members
Richard Davis
Don Bowen
Charles Owen
Paul Miller
Jill Spicer
Ted Nehring
ABSENT
Chairman
David Barfield
Ron Lueck
CITY STAFF
Planning Director
Planner
Plans Examiner
Barry LeBaron
Clayton Husband
Gregory Arrington
3.
OATH OF OFFICE FOR NEW MEMBER
Ted Nehring took the oath of office for the Planning and Zoning Commission and Capital
Improvements Advisory Committee.
4.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF JULY 1, 1996
APPROVED
Ms. Spicer made the motion to approve the minutes of the June 13, 1996, meeting as
presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Miller. The motion carried 5-0, with Mr.
Nehring abstaining.
tit
.
e
P&Z Minutes· Page 2
11 July 1996
5.
PZ 96-16
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF VERNON SMITH TO REZONE A
PORTION OF LOT 2R, BLOCK 2, CULP ADDITION, FROM 1-2 MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL TO
A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. (GENERALLY
LOCATED ON TRADONNA LANE)
APPROVED
Vice-Chairman Davis opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to
come forward at this time.
Mr. Vernon Smith, 3511 N Hall, Dallas, came forward to speak in favor of the request.
He stated they intend to develop residential lots on this portion of the property. He
stated when this property was part of Stonybrooke South, the lot widths ranged from
40 feet to 55 feet. He stated utilities are in the ground, and they intend to use the
existing facilities. Mr. Smith stated they are requesting 65 foot lot widths and 1,200
square foot minimum houses. He stated the minimum size of the houses to the east is
also 1,200 square feet. He stated they intend to construct mostly front entry garages,
unless the buyer wants otherwise.
Mr. J.H. Baker, 8336 Odell Street, came forward to speak in opposition to the request.
He stated his concern over the excavation of the lots because there is a line of oak trees
along their east property line. He stated the 28 trees are generally valued by the Texas
Department of Agriculture at $65,000 based on a standard formula. Mr. Baker asked for
the developer to state his intentions regarding the line of trees.
Ms. Terri Mace, 7605 Aubrey Lane, stated her opposition to the request. She stated her
concern over the possible loss of the trees.
Mr. Jim Mace, 7605 Aubrey Lane, stated his opposition to the request. He stated his
concern over the possible loss of the trees.
Mr. Bob Bess, 7600 Ridgeway Avenue, stated his opposition to the request. He stated
his concern over the possible drainage problems associated with the development.
Ms. Lou Baker, 8336 Odell Street, came forward to speak in opposition to the request.
Vice-Chairman Davis asked the developer if additional grading is required for the lots at
the northwest corner. He stated that retaining walls may be necessary to prevent any
further damage to the line of trees. He asked the developer to submit a detailed grading
plan for this area.
Mr. Smith stated there would probably be no cuts on the property due to the
topography. He stated that grading and drainage would be a consideration at the time of
platting. He stated it would not be financially feasible to submit a detailed grading plan
of the property without approval from the Council that the use would even be allowed.
Mr. Smith stated they have no definite use for the remainder of the industrial land. He
P&Z Minutes· Page 3
11 July 1996
stated additional streets may need to be constructed on the property depending upon the
e end user.
Mr. Bowen asked the developer if he would consider raising the minimum house size to
1 ,400 square feet.
Mr. Smith stated he would agree to a 1,300 square foot minimum house size, with the
average of all houses in the development being 1,500 square feet.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Vice-Chairman Davis closed the Public
Hearing.
There was general discussion regarding the drainage patterns in the area.
Vice-Chairman Davis stated the grading on the northwest lots is very critical to saving
the line of trees. He stated his support for the 1,300 square foot minimum house size.
Mr. Nehring stated he is in favor of a detailed grading plan.
Mr. Miller asked what the elevation difference was between the line of trees and the
proposed lots.
.
Mr. Baker stated anywhere from four to six feet.
Vice-Chairman Davis asked about the platting of the property.
Mr. Smith stated they intend to replat the property into three lots in order to convey the
property to different entities. He stated they will then replat the residential area into lots
based on the planned development regulations.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approved PZ 96-16 subject to the following
requirements: a minimum house size of 1,300 square feet, with the average of all
houses a minimum of 1,500 square feet; a twenty foot side building line on corner lots;
a twenty foot front building line on all lots; and the submittal of a detailed grading plan
for the northwest corner of the property specifically addressing the line of trees. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Owen. The motion carried 6-0.
6.
PS 96-28
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REVISIONS TO THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN
REGARDING RUMFIElD ROAD BETWEEN DAVIS BOULEVARD AND SPRING OAK
DRIVE.
APPROVED
e
Vice-Chairman Davis stated that Rumfield Road is proposed to be changed from an M4U
Minor Arterial to a C2U Minor Collector from Davis Boulevard to Spring Oak Drive.
P&Z Minutes· Plge 4
11 July 1996
Vice-Chairman Davis opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to
e come forward at this time.
Mr. O.G. Tobias, 8800 Rumfield Road, came forward to speak. He asked what the
status is of the engineering design.
Vice-Chairman Davis stated the right of way is currently being surveyed to determine if
the road can be built in the existing right of way. He stated the city is trying to move
the road as far away from the homes on the north side as possible.
Ms. Peggy Grubbs, 7501 Northfield Drive, came forward to speak. She stated she is in
favor of a small road.
Mr. William Chrastecky, 8937 Rumfield Road, came forward to speak. He asked if
sidewalks are part of the project.
Vice-Chairman Davis stated the proposed budget only shows pavement and curbs.
Ms. Patty Tansey, 8425 Rumfield Road, came forward to speak. She stated the Council
has considered a sidewalk on a portion of the north side of the street to serve the
existing neighborhoods.
e
Mr. Verne Jackson, 9008 Kirk Lane, came forward to speak. He asked what prompted
the City Council to consider changing the road to a 2 lane street.
Vice-Chairman Davis stated citizen input and concern during the past three months.
Mr. Jackson stated the most difficult question to answer is will the road be able to
handle the possible increase in traffic in the future.
Vice-Chairman Davis stated that is gamble the city is taking. He stated the city is
responding to the concerns of the citizens.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Vice-Chairman Davis closed the Public
Hearing.
Ms. Spicer made the motion to approve PS 96-28. The motion was seconded by Mr.
Miller. The motion carried 6-0.
7.
STAFF REPORT
e
Staff reminded the Commission of the Planning and Zoning Commissioner workshop
being held in Hurst on July 29th, and advised that all members would be registered if
they wanted to attend.
Staff advised the Commission that the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee would
convene after the next meeting to consider the land use assumptions plan.
e
.
e
P&Z Minutes· Page 5
11 July 1996
8.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Ms. Patty Tansey, 8425 Rumfield Road, came forward to speak. She commended the
Planning and Zoning Commission for working hard to address the needs and concerns of
the citizens.
Vice-Chairman Davis stated the Commission takes its job very seriously and appreciates
the comment.
9.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Richard Davis, Vice-Chairman
Planning & Zoning Commission
Charles Owen, Secretary
Planning & Zoning Commission
.
.
.
INFORMAL REPORTTO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. IR 96-81
~ Date:
T Subject:
July 22, 1996
Special Presentation - Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for
Fiscal Year 1995-96.
The City of North Richland Hills received the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for its
Comprehensive Annual Budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1995. The Budget Award
is a prestigious national award presented by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA)
recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation of exemplary budget
documents. The Distinguished Budget Presentation Award is valid for a period of one year only.
The City has received a Distinguished Budget Presentation award for the last six consecutive
years.
In 1982, the Government Finance Officers Association's Committee on Government Budgeting and
Management began a series of studies regarding "good budgetary practices." One result of this
study was a conclusion that the association should formally encourage exemplary budgeting
practices. The GFOA Executive Board approved the introduction of an Awards Program for
Distinguished Budget Presentation that would recognize exemplary efforts by governments and
nonprofit organizations.
Governments participating in the program submit copies of their approved budget documents for
review by an impartial panel of budget experts. Each budget document is evaluated using a
comprehensive checklist with four major categories. These major functions include the document
as a policy tool, an operations guide, a financial plan and a communications medium.
The focus of the Budget Review program is on the management elements of the budget document
and its effectiveness in a policy and public environment. Its emphasis on Performance Measures
bring accountability to government through documentation and further assist City Council and
Management through long range policy planning for the City's future. It is generally found that
jurisdictions whose budget documents are properly prepared tend to avoid many of the common
weaknesses in governmental financial management. The program encourages participants to
address the needs of elected officials, the public and interested parties in the financial policies of
the City, and encourages guidance in operations improvements. It helps avoid the tendency of
budgets to become static, direction less financial documents. A good budget document also
provides an excellent opportunity to communicate with the public, the financial community and the
press. It reinforces the needs of nontechnicians to obtain a general understanding of governmental
finance through the budget document.
An officer of the Texas GFOA will be at the Council meeting to present the Distinguished Budget
Award to the City. No action is needed by Council, but we do commend Debbie Durko, Budget
Coordinator, and the Budget staff for their professional efforts in the City's receiving this prestigious
award.
Patrick J. Elfri
Director of Finance
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
.
z
0
~
~
-<
ø.c
~
~
ø.c
E-4
~ {/)
~ lIS
s:.:: § ><
0 (l)
.~ E-4
~ == ~
.~ {/)
u ~ $-I r-I
. 0 0 r-I
C"J'.) 0 o~ .,...
C"J'.) .CI ~~ :z:
< 'Š ~ $-I.,... 'Ö
C"J'.) ~ Z Ä'B s::
[) J:: lIS
o:u 0 S ..c::0 r-I
~~ CI lIS 0 ..c::
~ E= $-IU ()
o § ~ O~ .,...
Z .Q(l) P:::
(1)U (l)ty) ..c::
Q'Ö
§] ~ ;j ~
$-I
0 ÇQ ~
æ C"J'.) u ~
~~ ~ 0
5.5 ~ >.
en ~ ~
ê~ .,...
0 U
(1) 'S ~
ð~ E-4
c.:> (1) -<
~~ u
s:
" I " I E=
~
. ~
u
~ ] ] .~ ~
i:! -.!3 00 ..
t¡.S ~.5 ~
~ ~ ..§ ~ ~
e" i! .!3 l <:)
~ C::¡.Q ...
-Š~~~~
"" ... t-.< ~ -c:
l'~ ~ ~ ~
6E~~~
ti~'< ~1I
~ ~.~ Oo~
.!3 ~ 'a'S .:!,
.§"ª ~ 1 ~
'a~~t3'"
..~~ ~
'3 --a00
~ ~-i! l
~ ._ ] .00.Q
\i~~:.ë!~
i'~] -š ~
~ ].!3 !3 ~
~ - .S~~ .~
-.::, <:)....'" ¡;¡
c -.!3....
.~ c c::¡ ~ 6
'i!'~ '3"1:Ì ~
~.9 .r ~ t¡
~]~~ ~
~... ~.~ ~
'" ~.... 'a ~
š§§~'"
~c i! E ~
~",~~1I{j
l>~..\i~1
~.~ ~ i §
t-.< ~ Oo~ ... ...
~...
~
0'1
0'1
M
~
~]
~
~
M
~
.~
c::¡
'"
.>
i
~
~
c::¡
I I ¡ "
, "
,....1
~
.
.
.
II
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
180 North Michigan Avenue. Suite 800. Chicago. Illinois 60601
312/977-9700. Fax: 312/977-4806
April 8, 1996
Mr. C.A. Sanford
City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182
Dear Mr. Sanford:
I am pleased to notify you that the City of North Richland Hills, Texas has received the
Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the current year, from the Government Finance
Officers Association (GFOA). This award is the highest form of recognition in governmental
budgeting and represents a significant achievement by your organization.
When a Distinguished Budget Presentation award is granted to an entity, a Certificate of
Recognition for Budget Presentation is also presented to the individual or department designated
as being primarily responsible for its having achieved the award. This has been presented to:
Deborah Durko, Budget Coordinator
We hope you will arrange for a formal public presentation of the award, and that appropriate
publicity will be given to this notable achievement. A press release is enclosed for your use.
We appreciate your participation in GFOA's Budget Awards Program. Through your example,
we hope that other entities will be encouraged to achieve excellence in budgeting.
Sincerely,
/#r/~
Jeffrey L. Esser
Executive Director
JLE/af
Enclosure
WASHINGTON OFFICE
1750 K Street. N.W.. Suite 650. Washington, OC 20006
202/429-2750 . Fax: 202/429-2755
.
Ii
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
April 8, 1996
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
180 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 800, Chicago. Illinois 60601
312/977-9700. Fax: 312/977-4806
PRESS RELEASE
For Further Information Contact
RELEASE IMMEDIATELY Stephen 1. Gauthier (312) 977-9700
******************************************************************************
Chicago--The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada
(GFOA) is pleased to announce that the City of North Richland Hills, Texas has received the
GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for its budget.
The award represents a significant achievement by the entity. It reflects the commitment of the
governing body and staff to meeting the highest principles of governmental budgeting. In order
to receive the budget award, the entity had to satisfy nationally recognized guidelines for
effective budget presentation. These guidelines are designed to assess how well an entity's
budget serves as:
.
·
·
·
·
a policy document
a financial plan
an operations guide
a communication device
Budget documents must be rated "proficient" in all four categories to receive the award.
When a Distinguished Budget Presentation award is granted to an entity, a Certificate of
Recognition for Budget Presentation is also presented to the individual or department designated
as being primarily responsible for its having achieved the award. This has been presented to:
Deborah Durko, Budget Coordinator.
Since the inception of the GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Awards Program in 1984,
approximately 700 entities have received the Award. Award recipients have pioneered efforts to
improve the quality of budgeting and provide an excellent example for other governments
throughout North America.
.
The Government Finance Officers Association is a nonprofit professional association serving
12,650 government finance professionals throughout North America. The GFOA's
Distinguished Budget Presentation Awards Program is the only national awards program in
governmental budgeting.
WASHINGTON OFFICE
1750 K Street. N.W, Suite 650, Washington, DC 20006
202/429-2750 . Fax: 202/429-2755
I
Department: Planning and Inspections
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Council Meeting Date: 7/22/96
Subject: Public Hearing to consider the request of Vernon Smith to Agenda Number: PZ 96-16
rezone a portion of Lot 2R, Block 2, Culp Addition, from 1-2 Medium Industrial
to a Planned Development for Single Family Residential. (Generally located on
Tradonna Lane)
Ordinance No. 2134
Mr. Vernon Smith, with Kingsgate Corporation, is the developer of a 24.82 acre tract of land generally
located at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Northeast Parkway. The current property owner
is Haverty Furniture Company of Atlanta, Georgia. Mr. Smith has submitted a zoning change
application to a Planned Development on a 6.432 acre portion of the tract. Mr. Smith proposes to
develop the property as single family residences.
The site under consideration is located between Odell Street and Northeast Parkway, along a vacated
street named Tradonna Lane. A portion of the site is also located on the south side of Northeast
Parkway, adjacent to the rail road tracks.
The surrounding area to the north and east is residential in character. The lots and housing sizes are
similar to the proposed development. The property to the west is zoned 1-2 Medium Industrial, and was
once the site for a Haverty's Furniture warehouse and distribution center. The area across the rail road
tracks to the south is zoned R-2 Single Family Residential.
The following is a summary of the proposed development.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other ()
1~~~B___ ø-
Department Head Signature
Lot and Area Requirements
1. Minimum Lot Area
2. Minimum Lot Width
a. Interior Lots
b. Corner Lots
3. Minimum Lot Depth
4. Minimum Dwelling Unit Size
5. Minimum Front Building Line
6. Minimum Side Building Line
7, Minimum Rear Building Line
8. Maximum Structure Height
6,300 square feet
60 feet
70 feet
100 feet
1,200 square feet
20 feet
6 feet on each side, except the street side of corner lots shall be 20
feet
1 0 feet
38 feet
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
e\\ ~~~anager
,Finance Director
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
I'
PZ 96-16, Page 2
General Requirements
.
1. Fences
2. Parking
As allowed in Article 9, Section 910: Walls and Fences
Off street parking to accommodate four cars for each dwelling
unit. At least two spaces must be covered.
As allowed in Article 6, Section 600 F&G
Front, side or rear entry garages may be allowed.
The exterior wall surface of each primary elevation shall consist
of at least 75% brick or stone.
None
3. Accessory Buildings
4. Garage Entry Requirement
5. Masonry Requirement
6. Landscaping Requirement
The above summary is based on the general site plan submitted by Mr. Smith and the current zoning
regulations of the city. There are two differences between the proposed site plan and the summary.
One, the side building lines on corner lots is different. The site plan shows ten feet on the street side
of corner lots. The standard requirement in all zoning districts in North Richland Hills is twenty feet,
mostly to allow enough room to keep cars off of the sidewalks on side entry garages. The other
difference is the front building line. The site plan indicates a twenty five foot building line; staff
recommends a twenty foot front building line. Since the lots are generally small, a shorter front
building line allows the space on the lot to be maximized after a house is built.
The area under consideration was at one time part of the Stonybrooke South subdivision, platted in
1986. The property was incorporated in the Culp Addition in 1987. The proposed street, Tradonna
Lane, was vacated; however, the curbs and utilities remained in place.
· At the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing on July 11, 1996, several persons spoke
regarding the line of trees along the common northwest property line. After considerable discussion,
the Commission recommended approval of the request subject to the following requirements: a
minimum house size of 1,300 square feet, with the average of all houses a minimum of 1,500 square
feet; a twenty foot side building line on corner lots; a twenty foot front building line on all lots; and the
submittal of a detailed grading plan for the northwest corner of the property specifically addressing
the line of trees.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council conduct the required Public Hearing and consider the
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
.
#
ORDINANCE NO. 2134
.
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NUMBER 1874, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ESTABLISH PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER TWENTY-ONE (21); PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a zoning district change to a Planned Development; and
WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official
Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein;
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, Planned Development District Number Twenty-One (21) be hereby established in the Case Number PZ 96-16, on
the following described property:
BEING a portion of Lot 2R, Block 2, Culp Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas
according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-213, Page 97, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more
particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at the northwest corner of Lot 71 R, Block 3, Stonybrooke South Addition, an addition to the City of North
~ichland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-213, Page 51, Plat Records, Tarrant
~ounty, Texas, also being in the south line of Odell Street (a 50 foot right-of-way);
THENCE South along the west line of Stonybrooke South Addition, a distance of 225.64 feet to the beginning of a curve to
the left having a radius of 353.57 feet;
THENCE along said curve and through a central angle of 34 degrees 33 minutes 46 seconds, and having an arc distance
of 213.29 feet to a point;
THENCE South 34 degrees 33 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 283.07 feet to a point for a corner in the north line
of S.L. & S.W. Railroad right-of-way;
THENCE South 55 degrees 26 minutes 14 seconds West along the north line of S.L. & S.W. Railroad right-of -way, a
distance of 500.14 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE North 89 degrees 33 minutes 27 seconds West a distance of 66.01 to a point for a corner in the east line of Lot
1, Block 2, Culp Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat
recorded in Volume 388-198, Page 86, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE North 00 degrees 17 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 225.40 feet to an angle point at the northeast corner
of Lot 1, Block 2, Culp Addition, also being an ell corner in the south line of Lot 2R, Block 2, Culp Addition;
THENCE North 00 degrees 17 minutes 39 seconds East a distance of 477.15 feet to an angle point;
THENCE North 00 degrees 17 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 240.02 feet to a point for a corner in the south line
of Odell Street;
"'HENCE East along the south line of Odell Street a distance of 250.04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing
6.432 acres or 280,190 square feet of land more or less.
This property is generally located on Tradonna Lane, between Odell Street and Northeast Parkway
2.
THAT, the development regulations for Planned Development District Number Twenty-One (21) shall be as follows:
1. Purpose: Planned Development District Number Twenty-One is intended to provide for single family detached
residential dwelling units.
2. Permitted Uses: Single family detached dwelling units.
3. Development Restrictions:
A. Lot and Area Requirements
1. Minimum Lot Area: 6,300 square feet
2. Minimum Lot Width
a. Interior Lots 60 feet
b. Corner Lots 70 feet
3. Minimum Lot Depth: 1 00 feet
4. Minimum Front Building Line: 20 feet
5. Minimum Side Building Line: 6 feet on each side, except the street side of corner lots shall be a
minimum of 20 feet
6. Minimum Rear Building Line: 1 0 feet
7. Minimum Dwelling Unit Size: 1,300 square feet, with the average of all houses to be a minimum of
1,500 square feet
8. Maximum Structure Height: 38 feet
B. Fences: As required by Article 9, Section 910, Walls and Fences, Ordinance No. 1874, as amended.
C. Parking: Off-street parking space shall be provided on the lots to accommodate four cars for each dwelling
unit. At least two of such spaces shall be covered; however, no supporting member of any garage, carport or
other automobile storage structure shall be located within the required front building line.
D. Accessory Buildings: As allowed by Article 6, Sections 600 F & G, Ordinance No. 1874, as amended.
E. Garage Entry Requirements: Front, side or rear entry garages may be allowed.
F. Masonry Requirement: The exterior wall surface, as viewed from each primary elevation, of all permanent
structures constructed in Planned Development Number 21 shall consist of at least seventy-five percent brick,
stone, or if approved by the City Council, other masonry or materials of equal characteristics. For the purposes of
this requirement, the exterior wall surface shall be defined as the area between the wall corners extending from
the top of the foundation up to the door or window header height of the first floor, whichever is greater. The area
of door and window openings shall not be included in the calculation of this requirement.
3.
THAT, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein
described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein.
4.
THAT, all the regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance Number 1874, as amended, which are not in conflict with the
terms of this Planned Development District Number Twenty-One (21), shall remain in effect regarding this property.
Ordinance No. 2134
Page 2
~ 5.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or
section of this ordinance shall be declared Invaiid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of
competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses,
sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without
the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
6.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance.
7.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage.
.APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF JULY 1996.
Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission
Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 22nd DAY OF JULY 1996.
Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas
.
Ordinance No. 2134
Page 3
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
Ordinance No. 2134
Page 4
'---
.
~
.
J. ...4
u. I ..
A"Cl I NPO A"C'LOT.
( MATCH, LINE - SEJ fri 84- 36 Page: C5
'"
':::
'"
o
~ ~~I'\\'~~
'9
:J¿
I
'"
~
"\,' \ \
'(b r~
~ . ~ .....
...._ . '" í:::)
~N R= >
~Ë¥ NC')
~
;; "! ! ~
E [J '" : ~"\
'~
i'O ~
I ~ 'Ø
N . % ~
~ ; ;
~ <¿ ~ n
~ ~ ¡: ~
~ ~. 1 B' \; \: ~ ~Z
V ~ ~~ t
~ "\ . ;:_: g; .
~ ~' ~ ~N ~ ~
~~'" N ~ ~. --....!./'¡¡~/' ~~.~L~,,:¡; ~ ~~l! ; ;
N _ ............. '""'Ii ð · I ¡ I 1 -\ - -
I ............. ~N J. ^~,'" ¡; ~ 1; '- 1; _-
:::: ~ ;¡; I \. -\ - 1.....t.1 ~ J ~I ~ - L:- ~ ~
N '" ~ _ i ¡ i ¡ · I ¡ ¡;;; ì i\ t », . '" \ ;¡; -;;
!:!... ~ _ ~. i~~ , ,I. . ¡ 0 1 R,. ~.- ~J ;\~;; : ..¡-----¡71~-
~ .._ ;; '"'" ¡; I III 2 i I?;" i . -I;IIØ SI - := I .... r:.w- . .
'ž "'. I-- I. J ~ .. -, -, "'-
Z > N _1- - - ~ ~ O· ~~ 0 :1:- ::: C'/,
> :: .._ ~,; . a. i ~..1 _ i·' · · ~ £ I ~7' ' i"~ ¡ - ~ ~ I ~ ',.-'
Z C .. _ , . ,,- . '. 0 - ~ ..--- ,
% -~: '"' ' þ. i . '14 V,Y')I . ¡:;: ... i m .... . ,.. -- 'oj "Ç
~ :~ : c~ ;;~: ¡-:- í ¡..,((~~_ ,\.H- \~ \ ,~TlT~ ~;o I:O~":"O\~~:,:
;: .. ~ ;; ..~, ~ ;~ ~.. ¡. · 1 -r: ~: ~ : .',i' ¡ ~ y . \ . \ . >
¡:: õ : .'::=. ¡. \. CD i ¡ ~~/Ví~.~/~_ ai, \~
;;: Õ .. ~ ... ¡ I I I ~.
, .";,, "_.' . .:::: '¡ I ,\ i i ;' ¡':1\SA:~i\ ¡¡II'; II ~ ä· _ ~ '¡ i1:\\ ~ ':0 f
- .. '" - - :1';< .. , ! A' \
õ\ .\_
; ~ \ -~- ~ ' ,
Þ'
.
.-It
- <¿ ~þ
\~ -
~
"
~
..
...
'"
'::
;
;
;;
...
;
C')
,;:
¡F~
!
N
Coo
¡~. 'AI
Nnr-¡V '; - - .1.--- ._.~._
N -
'"
:::: ...
'è: '"
;; .
,
..
"" ; '"
~ ¡;Þ,- :: ..
..l.
ó.. I ;; ~
,; ..
$ ~ ;: .
~ ¡;; <:
.~
ë ;; :
'\"'\"'\- _N"":J.
,. '1;) JUJUV'" IoIAUEY CT. Y 'è: ~
~~ ~ : õ ..~ /¡~~ ;¡; 'è:
\ .. ~ ~ ¡;,; ::; 1// - -..:-; ; ~ -=-
\ I' \' . 1..---:':' S ;;- "..... f-- N µ-. g -:- .
;; ~ : ~r<\'O" SNOÞ"C'" ....,--"',' - ~~~,:: ~ æ~ CII '"
... 1.00 -..'- g "- ..-- 7 ...' :::
--" Q ;:; :;;----:-- . ~~. ¡: ~~ -~~-
,1J ~L-,: .. ~ r ~ - ~.-¢ ~ ~~ ~ ..
I _ CII .. Õ y: 1;:iJ U' U' ~ ~-;:. ~ ,:PI
:1 ~ - "IDO'.f p~'.~ ~-;-; 10.:.:;;~; ~ ;;
~. 1 ~ -:- ;: - - - - .. \ .. \ ~~"-. ¡:: l ~ ~- ~ ~ - ~ ~
Jt±:tL: ~: :l,i~* ; \~ ~;; .
':~r=~ ~ , . <:'~:O<:I, ~~-1~\, \ ,\, \ ,I' \.:A~ ~ ; ~:
~', : f%) ~ ' , '<,,:,o:,,~ ' '~~ \ \ ; ~§,
}I-I' ,~~ 1·'I·,I:·~.g~r
--
;;
~
;; JG
.....
; ~ "'.....
~ . ....'
. ~ ~ 0>-'
N 0-
0
0 , 0
Co ;;
.....Þ ~
.
----
;;
-
..
~
~
~
>
C')
,
;;
~
;:
:s.- o ~ ¡
:: î
~ ~
~ ;¡ \~I 7;-'<
;;
- ("J ~ ,~ ./"'
PUBLIC HEARING DA TES
Zoning Case Review Fact Sheet
Case No. PZ 96-16
Planning and Zoning Commission: July 11, 1996
City Council: July 22, 1996
GENERAL INFORM A TION
1. Request
2. Applicant
3. Property Owner
4. Property Address
5. Legal Description
6. Acreage
7. Site
Characteristics
1-2 Medium Industrial to PD Planned Development
Vernon Smith, Kingsgate Corporation - 3511 N Hall Street, Suite 202 - Dallas 75219
Haverty Furniture Company - 866 West Peachtree Street NW - Atlanta GA 30308
6800 block of Davis Boulevard
Portion of Lot 2R, Block 2, Culp Addition
Approximately 6.432 acres
Vacant industrially zoned property. Existing curbs where street was proposed.
ZONING CONSIDERA TIONS
1. Proposed Use
2. Allowed Use
Single family residences
Uses in a Planned Development are described in the amending ordinance
3. Adjacent Zoning and Land Uses
North R-8: existing single family residences
South R-2: vacant property (across rail road tracks)
East R-8: existing single family residences
West 1-2: vacant property
4. Special
Development
Controls (Article 6)
5. Parking (Article 7)
6. Signs (Article 8)
7. Screening
(Article 9)
8. Landscaping and
Buffering
(Article 9)
Issues such as masonry requirements and accessory buildings are described in the
amending ordinance.
Off-street parking requirements are determined by the use of the property. Generally,
single family residences require four off street parking spaces, two of which are covered.
Signs in residential developments are usually limited to include real estate signs, poiitica!
signs and garage sale signs.
A 6-foot masonry screening wall is required between all industrial and single family or
multi-family property. (Section 910) A screening wall will be required along the west
property lines when the adjacent property develops. It is the responsibility of the
commercial property owner to construct the wall.
None required in single family developments.
·
·
·
ADOPTED PLANS
1. Master
Thoroughfare Plan
Primary access to this property is from Tradonna Lane, classified as an R2U Residential
Street (50 foot right-of-way, 2 lanes, undivided roadway). Secondary access is from
Northeast Parkway/Crystal Lane, also classified as R2U streets.
2. Land Use Master
Plan
The Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan calls for single family residential
development in this area. The request is consistent with the development policy set out
in the Land Use Plan.
3. Master Drainage No impact on this property.
Plan
4. Parks Master Plan No impact on this property.
5. Trail System Plan No impact on this property.
ZONING AND PLA TTING HISTORY
Zoning History This property was initially zoned AG Agriculture in 1967. A zoning change to R-8 Zero Lot Line
Single Family Residential was approved in 1985 (Ordinance 1261). When the property was
incorporated into the property to the west, the zoning was changed to 1-2 Medium Industrial
(Ordinance 1499)
Platting History This property was originally platted as part of the Stonybrooke South subdivision in 1986. In
1987. the property became part of the Culp Addition. The developer intends to submit a replat
of the property in the immediate future, and possibly additional replats in the future.
NRH City of North Rich/and Hills
APPLlCA TION FOR A 7301 NE Loop 820
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT North Rich/and Hills, Texa~
(Please print or type all responses) 817-581-5500
"
PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of applicant / agent:
Kingsgate Corp., by Vernon S. Smith, Jr.
Street address of applicant/agent
3511 N. Hall St. , Suite 202
City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: Telephone number of applicant / agent:
Dall as , Texas 75219 214-526-6545
PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name of property owner:
Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
Sifeetaddressofpropertyowner:
866 Wo Peachtree St. NW
City / State / Zip Code of property owner: Telephone number of property owner:
Atlanta, Georgia 30308 404-870-9428
Note: Attach letter or affidavit from property owner if different from applicant / agent:
See Attached Letter
PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Current zoning classification: Proposed use of the property:
1-2 Single Family Subdivision
Describe the nature of the proposed activity and any particular characteristics related to the use of the property:
'We propose to develop the property into a single family subdivision with nominal lot
dimensions of 65' X 100' and a minimum house size of 1,200 square feeto
Site plan attached which conforms with the requirements included in this packet: Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner:
~ Yes DNo Q=:J Yes I I No
I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the property described above and do hereby submit this request for approval
of a Planned Development District to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration.
Date:
Kingsgate Corp.
Print Namesv: Vernon S. Smith. Jr. Signature:
PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date of Planning & Zoning Commission Public Hearing: Taxes Paid? Case Number:
DYes D No
Date of City Council Public Hearing: Uens Paid? Fee:
DYes D No $300.00
Planned Development Approved: Assessments Paid?
DYes D No DYes 0 No
Conditions of Approval: This application will not be
scheduled for public hearing
until the application fee is
received.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
CD - 415 (2196)
·
·
·
.
HAVE RTYS
FURNITURE
May 30, 1996
Mr. Clayton Husband
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76180
Re: Zoning Application
6.4 Acres out of Lot 2R, Block 2
Culp Addition to the City of North Richland Hills
Dear Mr. Husband:
This is to confirm that Kingsgate Corp. is the prospective purchaser of the referenced
property and has the permission of Haverty Furniture Companies Inc., the present owner,
to file a request for a change in zoning from 1-2 to a Planned Development District for
Single Family housing.
Very truly yours,
HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES, rNC.
~,~-tf~~
awson Haverty, Jr., its Vice President
HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES. INC. 866 WEST PEACHTREE ST.. N.W.. ATLANTA. GA 30308-1123 TEL <40<4.881.1911 FAX <40<4.870.9<42<4
POST OFFICE BOX 5<4678. CIVIC CENTER STATION. ATLANTA. GA 30308-0678
....: 1 LJ. li:\¡~J..u 1.).1...
"
~~~~
~
2 3 4 10 10 9 8 7
rQ, ,~
~"6R 1óR ~~ ':::: ~~ : g¡: :~: ;~ :~T.:: 23%R"'~' ;:.' "
~17R~ ~2R" 7.Rst~~ 1::'R Ji3~~~'3~R\
.. (~O~ R I~ 8R II ~ 1'SR -,,¡" ~ ~ ~," u .. "-
$I I,~R 1 ~. 10R u 9R II 1~R 17R 18R~'9,\:!:; 26R! 27R!L128Rª 29RI
,,10 ",,'02 ._ ~ ~ .. 0:: .. ~ 1 ... ~
\.. RUTHETTE DR- .. 1(1 L J J. ~ 8400
19R 1 ,1: " "' II I II 1O~ln 'j- '~'~, ~, ~'.~' 10
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S.· j~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
?")C 24R1 b'"5m 26R1 27R1 ~ìFãi 1 {;~. JplRI 2R1 ~3RI í~1 µ5RI 36R1
~"""'. .£. 12JR¡!! I!........!a.,. f V ~ 8 8 ....... 8 8 ~ ~
4 . . 71 /'" ø '" -., - II R 1 'f' -. ~ C.,ì -., -., 10
,} 45.. "' II II ~"'(' j¡]l II ,,~ II r "' V"'6/ ¡"':J? ~ ., ~ ~,
I 54RI S3RI 52R1 51R1 Ì)~14'(RI ~8~ 47Rt k6~ 45R1 ~4M~ 2R1 41R~ 40R 39~
WI ~~ ~,,~ hlli~'S".ol ~s.'J 8~~lli1~~ Hill~~ Ç~~llii
. m " ., It ~ I' It " .' II II II It ,t at .' !ð ~
1
6· \ ~
..
)\
.
-
TR,I
5.15 Ac
-~;--I-~--~~ -.--
I
7""~ I
;. 36' ,7' 38' 39' 40' 41' 42'
""'-r-w
-,.-
ADDf'J
'ut
90\<)
84C
· · ~ ~ [7: . :~: ~ ¿ ~: :':: ~ ~ : ;,. ;, ~, :,
144, 45!~%íj .~,. ~. ", '" t i. -,;~7 - ".-,
Œ~ V:;~V.l· ~~.~' '. I ,~~. ""
· · ~ jt~ ~ f '~~'2R", ""
v~
~ ~ \ -NOC~-( !
~ f5\JR~~ZS
I þ./ \
I
I'
I
I ....
I
I
.
.
8JOO
..
6R~
..... '"
( "
~ 8R"
9R ~
~
R
:lIR
7
:l2R
/
lOR
~
~3R
&4R
~
:l4R
.,.,
....0
63R
" "fI.\":.
,0
f\V ¡p
. i ~:I
~ :l6R
Q, 1r
:l7R
Sf (-(I o/!
'1 51!?, 1
.. to Rot 1>-
'1"
~
o/!
NORTHEAST I KWY
/7
o
TR.1
5.92 Ac
)
I
I
31 4
I
I 8.319 0
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
fl)~
7'
-
Æ "'W
I ~ 2 3 4 ~ 5 ! 6 = 7
~-f' I
- . . . 110
-t!' 00
DONNA DR
3M "ò " T7
I 1 .. l»
~4 'J, .f1 52~3 4 5 6 7 8 9
.f' 'I 5 '04 ''''' .... . ~ . T7 10
-f''I. 281/ 1'>
TR.2C I ,~. ~ ,
.4 Ac : ~ 19 !! 18 . 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10
120 I ~ '20 ... . .."
T7 . U
,oÇ> 0 ~ ", Af'I j~
_f[;1"D I 3 J:;:J 8400 RANDY DR
I § I I" I I I I 7IT,Þf I I ¡W-
I.
,
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning and Inspections
Council Meeting Date: 7/22/96
Subject: Reconsideration of the request of Mark and Hsiang-Lan Wood Agenda Number: PS 96-18
for Final Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Wood Addition. (Located in the 7900 block of Smithfield
Road)
This Final Plat was approved by the City Council at its June 24, 1996, meeting, subject to several
requirements. Councilman Sibbett has requested that this item be placed on the July 22, 1996, agenda
for reconsideration.
Attached is a copy of the cover sheet from the June 24, 1996, meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council reconsider PS 96-18.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
'1~lg~~~
Depart t Head Signature
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
,Finance Director
Ql\ ~nager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, ,
..,,-'-~-"
/'
-./
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND H/LLS
-../
Department: Planning and Inspections
Council Meeting Date: 6/24/96
Subject: Request of Mark and Hsiang-Lan Wood for Final Plat of Lots 1 Agenda Number: PS 96-18
and 2, Block 1, Wood Addition. (Located in the 7900 block of Smithfield Road)
Mark and Hsiang-Lan Wood are the owners of a 4.441 acre tract of land located on the west side of
Smithfield Road, across the street from Green Valley Elementary. The developer has submitted a Final
Plat of the property for review and consideration by the City Council. The plat would subdivide the
property into two lots.
The following are the major items regarding this Final Plat. Other comments are included in the
attached engineering comments letter.
1. Street Improvements. Smithfield Road is currently unimproved on the west side of the street.
Due to the location of the school, existing traffic congestion at peak hours, and the ultimate roadway
width, Smithfield Road should be constructed as soon as possible. The developer may construct
the road or provide street escrow funds. The escrow amount is $116.66/foot for 300 feet ($34,998).
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the owner provide a covenant for future
street improvements to Smithfield Road.
2. Fire Protection. An additional fire hydrant is required to provide adequate fire coverage for this
property. The owner has agreed to construct the additional fire hydrant.
3. Water Line Relocation. There is an existing 12 inch water line located on the west side of
Smithfield Road which needs to relocated to accommodate the road's widening. The developer is
requesting a waiver of the water line relocation.
4. Sidewalks. Sidewalks are required on alllols as each individual 101 develops. ~:, ~lanDing and
Zoning Commission recommended that the owner provide a covenant for future sid al
improvements adiacent to Smithfield Road.
5. Screening Wall. The Subdivision Regulations require a masonry screening wall along this
property's frontage on Smithfield Road. A screening wall is required on all residential lots that have
frontage on a Collector or Arterial street. However, the Commission recommended a waiver this
requirement if a 100 foot building line was added to the plat. A 100 foot building line is shown on
the plat.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
,Finance Director
M
ity Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACT/ON /TEM
/
./5 96-18, Page 2
6. Drainage Improvements. The Preliminary Drainage Analysis indicates that some
improvements are required. The improvements could include a storm drain with a five year storm
capacity, and sufficient overland relief for a 100 year storm. The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended that the owner provide a covenant for future drainage improvements
to this property.
....,/
J
l.
The developer has addressed all engineering comments. The Planning and Zoning Commission
considered this Final Plat at its June 13, 1996, meeting and recommended approval subject to the
following: engineering comments; a covenant for future street, sidewalk and drainage improvements;
and a waiver of the masonry screening wall requirement.
RECOMMENDA TION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning
Commission. -
\.....;
\.....
. .
·
6-21
ANGING THE NAME OF RUM FIELD ROAD TO
TARNES ROAD.
WITHDRAWN
P&Z Minutes· Page 2
13 June 1996
Chairman Barfield
from conside
é:f that the City Council has asked that this item be withdrawn
stated that the Commission will consider reclassifying Rumfield Road from an
6.
PZ 96-14
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF MARK AND HSIANG-
LAN WOOD TO REZONE TRACTS 2A5 AND 2A6, HOOD SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 683, FROM AG AGRICULTURE TO R-1-S SPECIAL SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. (LOCATED IN THE 7900 BLOCK OF SMITHFIELD
ROAD)
APPROVED
·
7.
PS 96-18
REQUEST OF MARK AND HSIANG-LAN WOOD FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1 AND 2,
BLOCK 1, WOOD ADDITION. (LOCATED IN THE 7900 BLOCK OF SMITHFIELD ROAD)
APPROVED
Chairman Barfield stated the Commission will consider the zoning change and replat at
the same time but vote on each item separately.
Mr. LeBaron advised that this 4.5 acre tract is zoned agriculture and the owner proposes
to change the zoning to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential. He stated the owner is
requesting a covenant for many of the public improvements including streets, sidewalks
and drainage. He stated the developer will construct a fire hydrant.
Chairman Barfield opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to
come forward at this time.
Mr. John Zimmerman, 908 Main Street, Arlington, came forward to speak. He stated
the zoning request is appropriate for the area.
· There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing.
Chairman Barfield stated the Commission would vote on the zoning request then discuss
the subdivision plat.
P&Z Minutes· Page 3
13 June 1996
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 96-14 as requested. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Miller. The motion carried 5-0.
Chairman Barfield stated the issues on the plat concern streets, sidewalks and drainage.
Mr. Davis asked Mr. Wood if he is willing to sign a covenant for future street
improvements to Smithfield Road.
Mr. Wood stated yes.
Mr. Davis stated that the applicant has agreed to construct the fire hydrant. He stated
the Commission has already waived the masonry screening wall requirement.
Mr. Davis asked Mr. Wood if he is willing to sign a covenant for future drainage
improvements to the property.
Mr. Zimmerman stated that the required improvements are unknown at this time and
mostly depend upon how the property develops.
There was general discussion regarding the drainage situation on the property and in the
general vicinity.
After further discussion, it was the general consensus of the Commission to include the
drainage improvements as part of the street covenant.
Mr. Wood expressed his concern that the required improvements would cost almost as
much as the land is worth.
Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PS 96-18 subject to engineering comments; a
covenant for future street, sidewalk and drainage improvements along Smithfield Road;
and a waiver of the masonry screening wall requirement. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Owen. The motion carried 5-0.
8.
Mr. LeBaron stated a speci
abuts residential property. He
site plan appears to meet the ml
stated staff's only concern is that
the City Council approved when the
accomplished by showing the drivewa
IC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF DOUBLECREEK
:r AL CORPORATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A
E STORE ON A PORTION OF LOT 1 A, BLOCK 35, HOLIDAY
. (LOCATED IN THE 5600 BLOCK OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE)
APPROVED
e permit is required at this location because the property
ted the property is platted. He stated the proposed
m criteria for this particular use. Mr. LeBaron
driveway locations be shown according to what
cil considered the replat. He stated that can be
ations on the site plan.
Subdivision Plat Review Fact Sheet
Case Number PS 96-18
· GENERAL INFORMA TlON
1. Owner
2. Developer
3. Engineer
4. Surveyor
5. Acreage
6. No. of Lots
7. Density
8. Zoning
9. Prop. Use
UTILITY SERVICES
1. Water Lines
2. Sewer Lines
3. Fire Protection
·
Mark & Hsiang-Lan Wood - 6932 Glendale Drive - NRH 76180
same
John D. Zimmerman, P.E. - 908 West Main Street - Arlington 76013
same
4.441 acres
2
0.45 units per acre
AG Agriculture - the owner has applied for a zoning change to R-1-S Special Single Family
Residential
Single family residence
There is an existing 12 inch water line located adjacent to Smithfield Road. The line is
shallow, and must be relocated when Smithfield Road is constructed. The line may need
relocation when a fire hydrant is constructed.
An additional fire hydrant is required to provide adequate fire coverage for this property.
The existing 12 inch line may need to be relocated when the hydrant is constructed to
provide cover for the fire hydrant thrust blocks.
STREETS AND THOROUGHFARES
1. Thoroughfare Plan This property has frontage on Smithfield Road, classified as a C4U Major Collector
(68 foot right of way, 4 lanes, undivided roadway).
2. Improvements Smithfield Road is currently unimproved on the west side of the street. Due to the
location of the school, existing traffic congestion at peak hours, and the ultimate roadway
width, Smithfield Road should be constructed as soon as possible. The developer may
construct the road or provide street escrow funds. The escrow amount is $116.66/foot
for 300 feet ($34,998).
3. Street Extensions
4. New Streets
5. Street Lights
6. Access
7. Sidewalks
8. Screening Walls
·
None
None
Any required street lights will be installed in accordance with Public Works criteria.
Primary access to this property is from Smithfield Road.
Sidewalk improvements are required on this lot when any houses are constructed.
The Subdivision Regulations require a masonry screening wall along this property's
frontage on Smithfield Road. A screening wall is required on all residential lots that have
frontage on a Collector or Arterial street. However, the Commission waived this
requirement if a 100 foot building line was added to the plat. A 25 foot building line is
shown on the plat.
9. New Street Names None
MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN
1. Flood Plain Flood Insurance Rate Maps indicate that this property does not lie within the 100-year or
SOO-year flood plain.
2. Improvements The Prelimina,ry Drainage Analysis indicates that some improvements are required. The
improvements would include a storm drain with a five year storm capacity, and sufficient
overland relief for a 100 year storm.
3. Easements None.
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
1. Development The Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan calls for low density single family development in
this area. The request is consistent with the development policy set out in the Land Use
Plan.
2. Special Issues None.
. ,
·
JOaN D. ZIMMERMAN P.E.,R.P.S.
908 W. MAIN STREET
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76013
(817) 461-0188
April 22, 1996
City of North Richland Hills
7301 Northeast Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Tx 76180
Attn: Kevin Miller P.E.
Re: PS 95-041, Lot 1 & 2, Block 1, Wood Addition.
Dear Kevin;
Per previous conversation we have had concerning the Smithfield Road paving, 12" water
line relocation and stonn drain system. I am requesting that preparation of the plans be
waived. The conditions of the Preliminary Plat approval require that street and sidewalk
improvements be escrowed.
·
The Wood plat has 300 feet of frontage on Smithfield Road. Since the school frontage on
Smithfield Road is in excess of 900 feet it would appear that the school and the City
would not benefit from having 300 feet designed and constructed. The water line
relocation of 300 feet would require some temporary construction that would be removed
when the remainder of the project was constructed.
It is my opinion that the City would be better served to accomplish the design and
construction.
Thank you for your consideration in the matter.
( 1L~ð~
~n D. Zimm · . P.E.,R.P.L.S.
~
·
CITY OF N*RTH RICHLAND HILLS
Public Works
May 30, 1996
MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E.
Staff Engineer
SUBJECT: PS96-18; WOOD ADDITION; Block 1, Lots 1 & 2; Final Plat
We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on May 8, 1996. The
following items are for your consideration.
1. This plat fronts on Smithfield Road. Smithfield Road is designated as a C4U on
the Master Thoroughfare Plan. This designation requires a 68 foot ultimate
right-of-way. The distance from the centerline of any existing roadway of a
boundary street to the proposed subdivision shall be shown to determine the
adequacy of the ROW along the route and to determine if additional ROW is
necessary to accommodate the proposed street. Sufficient iron pins shall be
found or set and shown on the drawing together with dimensions to adequately
describe the ROW along Smithfield Road. This will need to be accomplished
before City Council considers the Final Plat.
2. This plat is located immediately west of Green Valley Elementary School. Due
to the location of the school, the existing traffic congestion at peak hours, and
the ultimate roadway width requirement, the road needs to be improved as soon
as possible. The Subdivision Ordinance requires that the Developer provide his
portion of these improvements. Construction plans need to be developed for the
widening of Smithfield Road. Due to the limited amount of frontage for this plat,
street escrow would be acceptable as an alternative to actual construction. The
escrow amount is 300 feet at $116.66/foot for a total of $34,998.
3. Based on the Preliminary Drainage Analysis, drainage improvements will be
required. Per the Design Manual, the storm drain with capacity for at least a five
year frequency storm plus overland relief sufficient to convey the one hundred
year frequency storm in the street and ROWand lor drainage easement will be
required. A final analysis and construction plans for the necessary
improvements will need to be provided.
P.O. Box 820609 * North Richland Hills, Texas * 76182-0609
7301 Northeast Loop 820 * 817-581-5521 * FAX 817-656-7503
, ,
·
·
·
4.
Smithfield Road is a C4U and does not have adequate fire protection for the
proposed lots. The Engineer has proposed adding a fire hydrant to the west
side of Smithfield Road. The existing 12" water line on the west side of
Smithfield Road is an old concrete pipe which is very shallow. It will be the
Developer's responsibility to relocate this water line (both horizontally and
vertically) when Smithfield Road is constructed. However, it may need to be
reconstructed now due to lack of adequate cover for the fire hydrant thrust
blocks.
5. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved a waiver of the masonry
screening wall if a 100 foot building line is shown on the Final Plat. This needs
to be corrected on the next submittal.
6. The current zoning needs to be clearly indicated on the face of the plat. This
includes the proposed lots and the adjacent lots.
7. The building setback lines needs to be shown for the adjacent property to the
north.
8. The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owners's Acknowledgment
Dedication. In addition, the surveyors seal and signature needs to added to the
plat prior to filing.
This review was based on the Final Plat submitted. The intention of this letter is to
comment on items of significant importance to the plat. A detailed review of the
construction plans will be processed when they are submitted. The marked-up blue
lines need to be returned with the next submittal.
~Jr.~
J la W. Skare, p(E.
S aff Engineer
JWS/pwm96074
cc: Kevin B. Miller, P. E., Assistant Public Works Director
Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning & Inspection Services
JO,HN D. ZIMMERMAN P.E.,R.P.S.
908 W. MAIN STREET
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76013
(817) 461-0188
June 7,1996
City of North Richland Hills
7301 Northeast Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Tx 76180
Attn: Planning & Zoning Commission
Re: Response to comments for PS 96-18, Wood Addition, Block 1, Lots 1 & 2, Final Plat.
I offer the following response to the comments.
1. The School has had their property fenced. During the construction of the concrete
curbing under the fence, a search indicates the property pins have been destroyed
completely around the lot. The edge of the improved paving of Smithfield was tied and
the dedication made using the new edge as the center of the required R.O.W. Additional
searching will be done for the property comers and dimensions from the fence curbing
will be added to the plat.
2. The Owner wishes to appeal the comment to the City Council.
3. The Owner wishes to appeal the comment to the City Council.
4. The Owner is agreeable to installing a fire hydrant but wishes to appeal relocation of
existing water.
5. Acknowledge comment, will correct building line.
6. Will clarify zoning on the plat of proposed and adjacent lots.
7. Will add building set back on property to the north.
8. Acknowledge comment and provide appropriate signatures and seal will be added to
the mylars.
Qo ~inCereIY,
~h~~;'" P. ~. R.P.L.S.
·
·
·
City ot North Richland Hills
NI~H APPLICATION FOR A 7301 N.E. Loop 820
FINAL PLAT North Richland Hills, TX
{PI-llJlllyou-r~ 817-581-5515
PropoSBd Subdivision Name:
Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Wood Addition
Cu"ent Legal Description:
A tract of land in the Alexander Hood Survey, Abstract 683
.
Name and Address of Cu"ent Property Owner:
Mark & Hsiang-Lan Wood Phone No. 485-6029
6932 Glendale Drive
North Richland Hills, Tx 76180
Name and Address of Pr8vÎOus Owner: (If purchas8d during past tw8/ve months)
Narns and Address of D8Ve/oper:
Same as Above Phon8 No.
Narns and Address of Engifl88r:
John D. Zimmerman P.E., R.P.S. Phone No. 461-0188
908 West Main Street Arlington, Tx 76013
Type of DeV8/opment B8ing Propos8d:
Ó SF Residentiaf o MF Residential o Other
o Duplex Resid8ntial o Commercial/Industrial
Anal Plat Application FN Calculation:
~~ 1. Application fN: $120.00
2. Number of resid8f1/ial lots @ SI.50 per lot: $3.00
ð~cfffiD ~ 3. Number 01 non-resid8f1tial aJ:res @ $5.00 per aJ:re: / /
Ç:; ~~~ _ Ü \\\\\Ü 4. Number of street interssction signs 0 $65.00 each:
o ~ 5. County plat recording fN: $60.00
1 Total fN: $183.00 j
~ðiNi" 'r, Q... ~
!'~J 0,,;
.-
I h8r8by certify that I am, or r8present. the legal owner of th8 property described aboV8 and do h8reby submit this Final Plat
to th8 Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration.
Date: 5~~-U Applicant's Phone No.:
Your name (Printed Name): Signa/UTe: ~j- ~vJ~
NDte: Please complete and submit the "Final Plat Document Submittal Checklist" on the
reverse side of this form.
PS<4~-\~
FINAL PLAT
CD - 402 (5 - 94)
.....
"-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
.epartment:
Subject:
Administration
Removal of Platting Requirement -
for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Antinonp. Addition
Council Meeting Date:
7/22/96
Agenda Number:
PS 96-24
At the City Council Meeting of July 8. 1996 you approved a plat at the corner of Mid-Cities Boulevard
and Dick Fisher Drive. The recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission suggested a
sidewalk on both Mid-Cities Boulevard and Dick Fisher Drive. The owner of Presto Printing has
requested that the requirement for a sidewalk on Dick Fisher Drive be removed as a platting
requirement. Review of this plat and our plans for the municipal property to the south suggests that the
sidewalk on Dick Fisher is not needed.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council take action to remove the sidewalk requirement on Dick Fisher
Drive from the subject plat.
--
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
.perating Budget _
.ther _
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM
Finance Director
Page 1 of
.t.w
'"
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning and Inspections
Council Meeting Date: 7/22/96
Subject: Public Hearing to consider revisions to the Master Thoroughfare Agenda Number: PS 96-28
Plan regarding Rumfield Road between Davis Boulevard and Spring Oak Drive.
Ordinance No. 2135
A public hearing has been scheduled to consider revising the Master Thoroughfare Plan regarding
Rumfield Road between Davis Boulevard and Spring Oak Drive. After considerable citizen input and
comment, the City Council decided to consider reclassifying a portion of Rumfield Road.
Rumfield Road is presently classified as an M4U Minor Arterial. The proposal before the City Council is
to reclassify the above described portion of Rumfield Road to a C2U Minor Collector. The remaining
eastern most portion of the road, between Spring Oak Drive and Precinct Line Road, would retain its
classification as an M4U Minor Arterial. An M4U Minor Arterial is a four lane, undivided road requiring
70 feet of right of way, A C2U Minor Collector is a two lane, undivided road requiring 60 feet of right of
way.
The City Council has amended the Capital Improvements Project Budget for 1995/1996 to include the
improvement of Rumfield Road. The widening project is proposed to be done in three phases. A copy
of the proposed schedule is included in the packet.
The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and considered this amendment to
the Master Thoroughfare Plan at its July 11, 1996, meeting and recommended approval.
RECOMMENDA TION:
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
-¡~ ¿ ß...-.. ~ t~\. bQ !~ \
Department Head Signature ~~ M:'nager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Review
Account Number
Sufficient Funds Available
,Finance Director
Ordinance No. 2135
.
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING
THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON
AUGUST 25, 1985; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills has forwarded a
recommendation to the City Council for amendment of the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a Public Hearing to consider said revisions, and after
hearing, determines that such revisions shall be adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, Rumfield Road, classified as an M4U Minor Arterial on the Master Thoroughfare Plan, be
hereby reclassified as a C2U Minor Collector from its present intersection with Davis Boulevard to its
.proposed intersection with Spring Oak Drive, as shown in Exhibit A.
2.
THAT, the Master Thoroughfare Plan map be redrawn to incorporate this amendment.
3.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the
section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any
phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or
unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity
or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs
or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without
the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph or section.
4.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas,
as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance;
emd that the Master Thoroughfare Plan shall hereafter reflect these revisions.
5.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF JULY 1996.
Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission
Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 22nd DAY OF JULY 1996.
Mayor
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
Ordinance No, 2135
Page 2
· '-....,-',
·
-....
4:
t.
d)
I
t-I ~ :
UI~
..... z . ~
012,·:3
r.1 .1><
,.¡ 0 f<
,.¡ 0 ...
>.¡. 0
><.z..¡..
¡,¡ <.oo
,.¡ II: !!:
,.¡ II: :>
0<...
o ¡. ...
'.
.,';)
'.
Þþ".
~
ê '10 rlUIIUGN
~
i
.
.
~
5
~
u
,
i
IIU, Cf.
I 09d S~^V'a í
~: \ ~ +
Q I 0 ¡:to :::I:
3 ~ '.. ,......... . '·0 ~
> I ~ ' · '. c..c c..,
'c, m1 '..em ~ I ~ "~~ ~ ,>.' g $1
I A',.~, i .
::> < . Vd- ,- 5ti .co ,...!::.... ::r: ...111..., .C,
N > I ..o~'" fti '.. U, +=r .u..o,
I .... '90 "I~ un Uon
U Z I i. l~ 1
~ . .0 .......... PO, I ~ ::¡: ........
.... 8 "1m Dl.I.rrn -f..::
~ I g c"."wooo .... ~ I e -
q g ~ g II ".0.0' ,; e :J: ,
I !, t ! , e : ~ t "' 1U" :
I :~ 2 ' :~! I: ~ I
~....- =- - -- . I! .....:.L I
. · ----.,~ _ I õ
--- 1\ a131:1Hl.l~S I ~ ~ -...,.---_ ____________
n t J . a I ~ ~ I n V J~ I n t J
'1 : ~ I : I
O~ ~; I ; ,
·
......... M_. ..."..
a9J1\1
~. ~ i I--,.._~ '~,'
'\ \ ~ . S.LIJ"tI"I Ã.LIO 1
...¥.~&I-.-... '14._.-1&......01..1.&1111:\...11 .
. aT N 11 .l J N I J 3 ~$1 ~ .... ...... ~ S.LIrU' J"IO; S'T1IH a..~ ~
¡-- a 9 J1\I '\ ........... J .fI "J h i ~ ~ '
, .;or... :2 : :'=:.;;
..~ . J L;;; . !!:~ ,
' 0..... DI. c.:: i-- & .~- ¡
. . .þ". Q \
'. ....o~z I
'0 \. ~~I
:'" ~~ ~\ \," 0> ,..~l .,J;!',
\\,0.. ~~_____..._______.
'II .' < . a ~ 3 N V' H J
......, : 3 'U <. I n l J
'..- . ~ I
! nO)l.' ~ u 0 '.. ..n...
! ...~~ I C 4 Ù\ \
N3ã3---r---~\. .
t J =4 \~d-o
(it ~ 1-
-:1::: \\ OJ'
_.:1: 1\ c>~
~ ¿\ 1-L .-_...
o 0:/ ù'\
¡ UJ I ........... 0', \\
¡ ::>6, \ '1>........ '>~\~ i
~ ~I :.. w :: ...... \. \~¡
U (j no.,n.aO'" i. - '¡'þ. "\
~ I ; ! no.. .., ! _n<o"" \. .....
.~~.
""o\"""004'g "0 IU'Jo.&n, ~'. "
~.
Z
...J
~
a::
~ci
..
~-...... -...
"
~
.;.
t
\
",. ""0 "'40,
c.I>""f.
;
.
~
·
i
·
·
t
e
,;
.
!
1
<T,
?
i
.
e
°
°
i
C~
'.'C.. Q 9
". .0Wln LH, cI
\ :
;
e
c.....nn "Ii,
5
i
d ""C ""C ""C
::T ::T ::T
~ ØJ ØJ ØJ
en en en
r- (t) (t) (t)
- - -
en - -
-
mo om -uen
a.Q) Q) a. ..,"'C
CD < ACD CD ..,
n -,
:J (ñ' 0:J -, :J C
;eOJ :JCC
~. ;e $lO (t)
o 0 < 0 en
Q) c CD Q) rQ) 0
a. - a. 5' A :!.
CD
< ...... CD 0 "C
0
Q) ;e ~, ~
.., en 0
a. o <
"'C Q) CD :J
...... ~,
0 a.......
:J 0
CC
",01 N ~ ~
- - - r-
~ 01 -...J ~ (t)
<:) 01 01 0 :J
<:) 0 0 0 (Q
~ ;::Þ ;::Þ ;::Þ .....
::T
» en s: 0
"'C CD Q) 0
~, "'C .., :J
...... 0
~ CD :::r en
CD 3 .....
~ ..,
CD cr CD c:
ex> CD CD 0
.., -...J ~
~ 0
CD :J
CD m
-...J
:J
a.
C
ØJ
.....
(t)
-
(t)
en
r+
-
V) -{fl -{fl -(fl
I\) CD 0) 0)
'" Q) 01 01
I\) m
00 CD 0) 01 en
~ 0 ..þ.. 01 ~
co 0 0 0 3
<:) 0 0 0 o~
<:)
. o (t)
<:) en a.
<:) ....."
..,
0
_.
(t)
0
.....
o
o
::J
en
r-+
....,
c:
(')
r-+
-.
o
::J
(J)
(')
::r-
CD
Cl-
c:'
-
CD
~
....,
;0
c:
3
::!'!
CD
-
c..
;0
o
Q)
c..
/'
I
CITY 0 F
NORTH RICH LA NO HILLS
J
Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date:
Amendment of the 1995/96 Capital Improvement Projects
Subject: RIHigAt to show RllmfiAlrf Ro;::¡rf ;::¡s Thrpp (:\) ~Ar;::¡r;::¡tp Agenda Number:
Projects
4/08/96
PW 96-21
The budget for the paving and drainage improvements to Rumfield Road was approved by Council on
2/12/96 (GN 96-23). The approveq budget was for the preliminary design of Rumfield Road from Precinct
Line Road to Davis Boulevard and the final design and construction of Rumfield Road from Precinct Line
Road to Eden Road.
In an effort to reduce the potential traffic flow from Oak Hills Phase II through the Flamingo Estates and
Eden Addition subdivisions, the City Manager has requested staff divide Rumfield Road into three phases.
Each phase will be shown as a separate project in the Capital Improvement Projects Budget. This will allow
the City the flexibility of doing each one separate or to combine any or all of the phases together and
constructing as one project. The description and limits for each phase is shown below:
Rumfield Road, Phase I will consist of designing and constructing a 48-foot wide asphalt street with curb
and gutter from Precinct Line Road to the proposed Spring Oak Drive, a new street proposed by the
developer of the Oak Hiff Phase II subdivision. The City Manager recentfy met with the developer and
adjacent property owners to work out an agreement to construct Spring Oak Drive. As a result of the
meeting one of the adjacent property owners agreed to dedicate the right-of-way for the new road and the
developer agreed to constr~ct the new road with the Oak Hiffs Phase II subdivision.
Rumfield Road, Phase 1/ will consist of designing and constructing a 48-foot asphalt street with concrete
curb and gutter from Spring Oak Drive to Eden Road.
Rumfield Road, Phase 1/1 will consist of widening an existing 2-lane asphalt street with ditches to a 48-foot
wide street with concrete curb and gutter, This phase will begin at Eden Road and will be constructed west
to Davis Boulevard.
Each phase will include the necessary storm drain improvements required to construct Rumfield Road.
Fundinq Source:
Funding of all three phases of Rumfield Road may require a reevaluation of projects currently scheduled to
be completed as a part of the 1994 Bond Election Program. Unless eventual cost savings associated with
these remaining projects are sufficient to offset Rumfield Road's construction costs, projects may be
delayed until future funding is approved.
Recommendation:
Source of Funds: r.
Bonds (GO/Re ~OUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED
.operating Budg TS: ,
Ot er
get in accordance with the three attachments to this
Finance O..."'O(
t Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Pace 1 r'if
,/ T II
:i
I
I 11
., II ¡ J
i
I
II North Tarrant P
I
- I
N
r
Ls~
1
~
o
o <' ~
113
w
E
s
I Project LocaIiOl1
I
I
,
'-
Q
S
o
c
en
u
:>
II:
YseptuÞe,. 12. 199.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
e
Department: Administration
Council Meeting Date: 7/20/96
Subject:
Local Law Enforcement Block Grant - Resolution 96-47 Agenda Number: GN 96-85
The City is in the process of applying for a Local Law Enforcement Block Grant. One of the requirements
of the Grant application is the City Council's formal approval to apply. If awarded, the Grant will provide
$34,676 for an additional School Resource Officer. The City's matching amount is required to be $3,852.
These funds are available from Crime Control and Prevention District monies.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution 96-47.
e
Finance Review
Ignature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Director
Page 1 of
e
e
e
RESOLUTION NO. 96-47
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills possesses legal authority to apply for
the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant;
NOW, THEREFORE:
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, THAT the filing of the application for the Local Law Enforcement Grant is hereby
authorized and that Andrew A. Wayman act as the official representative of the City in
connection with the Grant application.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this the 20th day of July, 1996.
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
,
Department: Finance
Council Meeting Date:
7/22/96
Subject: Nomination to Fill a Vacancy on the Tarrant Appraisal Board Agenda Number:
of Directors - Resolution No. 96-49
GN 96-86
A vacancy has been created on the Tarrant Appraisal Board of Directors due to the resignation of Mr.
Mac Wilburn. Schedule conflicts stemming from frequent out of state business trips was Mr. Wilburn's
stated reason for resignation.
The Appraisal Board consists of five members elected to two year terms by the various member cities
comprising the district. Mr. Wilburn was one of five persons nominated by North Richland Hills at its
October 9, 1995 council meeting. Elected at the same time as Mr. Wilburn, and still serving are Mr.
Gene Miers of Ft. Worth, Mr. Joe Potthoff of Arlington, Mr. Charles Rogers, Ft. Worth, and Mr. Tommy
Vaughn of Arlington.
The process of filling a vacancy differs from the bi-annual general election of board members. After
the Chief Appraiser has received nominations a majority vote by the board will select the new member.
Mr. Bill Brown, a former long time Tax Collector of the HEB School District, has brought to our
attention Mr. Michael A. Davis as a potential nominee for consideration by the Council. It has also
been communicated to us by Mr. Brown that the City of Hurst is also considering the nomination of
Mr. Davis. A resume for Mr. Davis is attached. Of special note is Mr. Davis's long term membership
as a member of the Grapevine-Colleyville School Board from 1977 to 1994.
RE~OMMENDATI01i:.
If Council desires to nominate Mr. Davis or any other candidate for this vacancy, resolution 96-49
must be passed and submitted to the TAD no later than August 14, 1996.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev,)
Operating Budget _
Oth
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
re
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance OW.Clot
Page 1 of
·
·
·
RESOLUTION NO. 96-49
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills desires to nominate
a candidate to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of the Tarrant Appraisal
District; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of the Board of Directors
in providing leadership for the Tarrant Appraisal District; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to promote a continued emphasis on fair and
uniform appraisals and the efficient operation of the Tarrant Appraisal District;
NOW, THEREFORE:
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, THAT Michael A. Davis be nominated to serve as a member of the Tarrant
Appraisal District Board of Directors.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this the 22nd day of July, 1996.
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
.SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 7-16-96 2:00PM:
·
·
·
l
H-E-B I. S. D."
95615516:# 2 \
Michael A. Davis
.. 703 Cresthaven
ColleyvlJle, TX 76034
D.O.B. 3/13/48
Wife - Bridget M. Davis
Married 28 years
Keith Davis .. Age 18
Rebecca Davis· Ale 1 5
Taylor Davis.. Ale 13
Born .. Ft. Worth, Texas
First Baptist Church, Grapevfne, exas
Deacon and 6t11 Grade Sunday S hool Teacher
Member of GCISD School Boa~ , 1977-1994
President, 1992-1994 of GelS
Member of CED, 1991-1994
Grapevine Rotary - Treasurer, S retary, Vice President
Chamber of Commerce.. Grape ne, Colleyvllle, and Southlake
President of Grapevfne Chamber 1980-81
D. E. Box Citizen of the Year In rapevlne, 1980
President of Kiwanis Club, 1978
State Fann Agent In Grapevine,
Lifetime Member of Presidents
Lealon of Honor
Bronze Tablet Winner
Denton Hilh School, 1966
NTSU - BBA - Accountln¡, 197
Moved to Grapevine In 1973
Community Volunteer and Lead r '
, .
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
eDepartment: PoliC'.A nAp~rtmAnt
Council Meeting Date: 7/?7/96
Subject:
Resolution No, 96-50 authorizino sionature to '
Interlocal Agreement on Auto Theft Task Force
Agenda Number: GN 96-87
Our Police Department is a member of the Tarrant County Auto Theft Task Force. It is necessary for ou
City to execute the 1996 TARRANT COUNTY AUTO THEFT TASK FORCE INTERLOCAL ASSISTANC
AGREEMENT with Tarrant County, the Sheriffs Department and the District Attorney. Resolution No
96-50 gives the Mayor authority to execute the Interlocal Agreement.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council pass Resolution No. 96-50.
.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
AOperati dget _
WOther
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Fin.... Director
Page 1 of
·
·
·
RESOLUTION NO. 96-50
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills· Police Department is a participant in
the Tarrant County Auto Theft Task Force; and
WHEREAS, in order for Tarrant County, which administers the Task Force
Program, to make application for 1997 Federal Grant Funds, it is necessary for the City
of North Richland Hills to execute a current Task Force Interlocal Agreement; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1.
The Mayor be, and is hereby authorized to execute the 1996 TARRANT
COUNTY AUTO THEFT TASK FORCE INTERLOCAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT
referred to above with Tarrant County, the Tarrant County Sheriffs Department and the
Tarrant County District Attorney's office, as the act and deed of the City of North
Richland Hills,
PASSED AND APPROVED this 22nd day of July, 1996.
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
Tommy Brown, Mayor
Patricia Hutson, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City
.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
§
§
§
THIS ORIGINAL
Executed by Tarrant County and
by North Richland Hills Police Department
(NAME OF OTHER ENTITY)
COUNTY OF TARRANT
THE TARRANT COUNTY AUTO THEFT
TASK FORCE INTERWCAL AsSISTANCE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the detection, apprehension, and prosecution of individuals who commit
auto theft is often hindered because the range of operations of the criminal offender is
greater than the jurisdiction of the peace officers called upon to investigate the crime; and,
WHEREAS, the existence of a multiplicity of political jurisdictions in Tarrant County
impedes the effectiveness of individual law enforcement agencies to detect and eradicate
auto theft; and,
.
WHEREAS, past experience has indicated that a cooperative effort between law
enforcement agencies and Tarrant County has been effective in detecting and deterring the
activities of targeted criminal groups to the mutual benefit of all the political entities of
Tarrant County; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 362, Texas Local Government Code, the Texas
Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, Chapter 741, Texas Government Code, Art. 4413 (37),
TEX. REV. CIV. ST AT. ANN., an Act relating to the creation, powers and duties of the
Automobile Theft Prevention Authority, and the law of the State of Texas, the contracting
cities, the County of Tarrant, the Texas Department of Public Safety, the Tarrant County
Criminal District Attorney, and the Tarrant County Sheriff, hereby agree to participate in,
and be a part of a cooperative investigative and enforcement effort to be known and
. designated as the Tarrant County Auto Theft Task Force; and,
THE TARRANT COUNTY AUTO TIIEFr TASK FORCE
INTERLocAL AsSISTANCE AGREEMENT
Page 1
.
.
.
~
WHEREAS, a grant of money from the Texas Automobile Theft Authority of the
Governor's Office of the State of Texas has been received to fund the establishment of the
Tarrant County Auto Theft Task Force;
Now, THEREFORE, BE IT KNOWN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT Tarrant County, acting by and through its duly authorized County Judge,
Criminal District Attorney of Tarrant County, and Sheriff of Tarrant County, and the
cities and other law enforcement entities (including the Texas Department of Public Safety)
that have executed, are executing, or will execute substantially similar copies hereof at this
time or in the future during the time that this agreement is in force, acting herein by and
through their duly authorized chief administrative officer or equivalent do hereby covenant
and agree as follows:
TASK FORCE
THE Tarrant County Auto Theft Task Force ("Task Force") will be a part of the
Tarrant County Sheriff's Office for administrative purposes. The activities of the Task
Force shall be supervised by a nine (9) member Board of Governors. This Board will
include as voting members the Fort Worth Chief of Police, the Arlington Chief of Police,
the Tarrant County Criminal District Attorney, a Police Chief from a Mid-Cities area
police department, a Police Chief from a city with a population under 10,000, a Police
Chief from a city with a population between 10,000 and 30,000, a Police Chief from a city
with a population over 30,000, the Regional Captain of the Texas Department of Public
Safety's motor vehicle theft service, and a Chairperson, who shall be the Tarrant County
Sheriff. Ex officio members, if any, may be added by agreement of the voting members;
THE TARRANT COUNTY AUf 0 THEFr TASK FORCE
INTERLocAL AsSISTANCE AGREEMENT
Page 2
·
·
ex officio members shall be non-voting. City population brackets may be changed by
agreement of the Board without the necessity of changing this agreement.
THE Board of Governors shall have the responsibility for policy, direction, and
control of the Task Force. The Board of Governors will have direct responsibility for the
selection of a Commander for the Task Force. The Board will monitor the activities and
accomplishments of the Task Force to ensure orderly progress towards attainment of all
stated objectives.
THERE will be one enforcement unit, which may form sub-groups or teams as
appropriate. The activities and investigations of these sub-groups or teams shall be directed
by the Commander of the Task Force. These sub-groups or teams will have the duties
assigned to them by the Commander.
AUTO THEFf INvEsTIGATION
Auro theft investigations within the jurisdictional bounds of the entities joining this
agreement may be coordinated through the Task Force. All commercial auto theft
intelligence received by a law enforcement agency that is a party to this agreement may be
referred to the Task Force for investigation. The Task Force will maintain intelligence
fIles. The assigned officers will respond to complaints in a timely manner.
AssET SEIZURES
ALL asset seizures developed by the Task. Force will be prosecuted by the Asset
Seizure Team of the Task Force. The attorneys assigned to the Task Force by the Criminal
· District Attorney will be responsible for representing the State of Texas and the Task Force
THE TARRANT COUNTY AUTO THEFT TASK FORCE
INTERLocAL AssISTANCE AGREEMENT
Page 3
·
e
in all auto theft case forfeiture proceedings maintained under the provisions of applicable
laws.
THERE is hereby created a certain fund to be know as the Auto Theft Task Force
Asset Seizure Funds, (hereinafter called "Fund",) said Fund to be created in compliance
with State law and the requirements of the grant restrictions.
FORFEITURE POLICY
UPON entry of a judgment in a forfeiture proceeding awarding monies or other
proceeds to the Tarrant County Auto Theft Task Force, said monies or proceeds will be
immediately deposited in the Auto Task Force Asset Seizure Fund. The monies and
proceeds in this Fund must be used to further the purpose of the Task Force as required
by the Tarrant County Auto Theft Task Force Grant award: enhancement of currently
funded and/or future motor vehicle theft prevention programs.
ALL forfeiture funds shall be subject to audit by the Auditor of Tarrant County,
Texas.
ANY conveyance or vehicle that is the subject of a rmal foñeiture shall be awarded
to the Task Force to be used to further the purpose of the Task Force as required by the
Task. Force grant award.
OFFICER STATUS
ANY law enforcement officer assigned to the Task Force by a governmental entity
which is a party to this agreement shall be empowered to enforce all laws and ordinances
e applicable in the jurisdiction of the county and municipal entities signatory to this
THE TARRANT COUNTY AUf 0 THKItT TASK FORCE
INTERLocAL AsSISTANCE AGREEMENT
Page 4
·
e
It
agreement, including the power to make arrests, execute search warrants, and investigate
auto theft offenses outside of the geographical jurisdiction from which he or she is assigned,
but within the area covered by the jurisdictions of the county and municipal entities which
are parties to this agreement.
WHILE functioning as a law enforcement officer assigned to the Task Force, he or
she shall have all the law enforcement powers of a regular law enforcement officer of such
other political entity.
A law enforcement officer who is assigned, designated, or ordered by the official
designated by the governing body of any entity to perform law enforcement duties as a
member of the Task Force shall receive the same wage, salary, pension and all other
compensation and all other rights for such service, including injury or death benefits and
workers' compensation benefits, paid in accordance with the A TP A Grant Guidelines, as
existing or as may be amended, and applicable law, as though the service had been
rendered within the limits of the entity from which he or she was assigned. Recognizing
the benefits to a participating entity to this agreement, it is agreed that all wage and
disability payments, including workers' compensation benefits, pension payments, damage
to equipment (with the exception of leased vehicles, for which damages will be covered
under the provisions of the lease(s» and clothing, medical expense and expense of travel,
food, and lodging shall be paid in accordance with the A TP A Grant Guidelines, as existing
or as may be amended. However, peace officers assigned to the Task Force will not work
overtime that is not reimbursable to their assigning agency without prior approval from
their assigning agency supervisor. [For example, Fort Worth Police officers assigned to the
Task Force will not work overtime, which is not reimbursable to the Fort Worth Police
THE TARRANT COUNTY AUTO TU.J:£f4Y.' TASK FORCE
INT:ERLocAL AsSISTANCE AGREEMENT
Page 5
·
e
e
Department, without prior approval from their Fort Worth Police supervisor.] Instead,
they will be permitted to flex their work hours as necessary to accomplish Task Force
objectives and assignments.
IN further recognition of the benefit to be gained by the entity participating in the
Task Force, it is agreed that no entity that is a party to this agreement shall receive or be
entitled to reimbursement from another entity participating in this agreement for any
services performed pursuant to this agreement.
IT is further agreed that, in the event that any law enforcement officer assigned to
the Task Force is cited as a party defendant to any civil lawsuit, state or federal, arising
out of his or her official acts while functioning as a law enforcement officer assigned to the
Task Force, said law enforcement officer shall be entitled to the same benefits that such
officer would be entitled to receive had such civil action arisen out of an official act within
the scope of his or her duties as a member and in the jurisdiction of the law enforcement
agency from which he or she was assigned. Further, no entity shall be responsible for the
acts of a law enforcement officer of another entity assigned to the Task Force. Each entity
participating herein indemnifies and holds all other participating entities harmless for all
acts of its own officers and employees acting hereunder, to the full extent permitted by law.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
THIS Contract is subject to all grant conditions applicable to the grant of the Texas
Automobile Theft Prevention Authority of the Governor's Office to the Tarrant County
Auto Theft Task Force.
THE TARRANT COUNfY Auro Ta.KltT.' TASK FORCE
INTERLocAL AsSISTANCE AGREEMENT
Page 6
e
e
e
EACH party to this agreement expressly waives all claims against every other party
for compensation for any loss, damage, personal injury, or death occurring as a
consequence of the performance of this agreement.
THIRD party claims against members shall be governed by the Texas Tort Claims Act
or other appropriate statues and laws of the State of Texas and the United States.
IT is expressly understood and agreed that, in the execution of this agreement, no
party waives, nor shall be deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or defense that would
otherwise be available to it against claims arising in the exercise of governmental powers
and functions.
THE validity of this agreement and of any of its terms or provisions, as well as the
rights and duties of the parties hereunder, shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Texas.
IN case anyone or more of the provisions contained in this agreement shall for any
reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity,
illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision thereof and this agreement
shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been
contained herein.
THIs agreement shall become effective as to a party hereto on the day of the
execution of the agreement by the party, and shall continue in effect as to a participating
entity for one year from the date of signature and thereafter until it has been terminated
or rescinded by appropriate action of the participating entity's governing body, or expires
due to termination of the grant or by operation of law. [To minimize the administrative
difficulty of signature between the many parties, each city or other law enforcement entity
THE TARRANf COUNTY AUf 0 THEFr TASK FORCE
INrERLocAL AssIsTANCE AGREEMENf
Page 7
e
e
e
will sign a substantially similar agreement with Tarrant County; however each party
signing substantially similar copies is immediately bound one to another to all other entities
participating during the time said agreement is in force as to said entity, even though the
parties' signatures appear on different copies of the substantially similar copies. Any entity
being added after the agreement is in effect need only sign the documents which Tarrant
County signs to be fully a party bound to all other parties, and such signature shall, as of
the date of the signing, have the same force and effect as between the joining and already-
bound members as if a single document was signed simultaneously by all then-participating
entities.]
IF program enhancement activities are terminated, unexpended revenues will be
promptly returned to the Automobile Theft Prevention Authority.
THIS agreement may be amended or modified by the mutual agreement of the parties
hereto in writing. The Interlocal Agreement is for the period and on the conditions herein
contained, and on such conditions to this agreement as may be added by amendment or by
law, and not for any period beyond that permitted by law, nor for any purpose not
permitted by law.
THIS instrument contains all commitments and agreements of the parties, and no oral
or written commitments have any force or effect to alter any term or condition of this
agreement, unless the same are done in proper form and in a manner constituting a bona
fide amendment hereto.
THE parties agree that their collective agreement may be evidenced by the execution
of an identical counterpart of this instrument by the duly authorized omcial(s) of each
participant and the failure of any anticipated member to enter into or renew this agreement
THE TARRANT COUNTY AUTO 1ÌIElt-r TASK FORCE
INTERLocAL AsSISTANCE AGREEMENT
Page 8
It
e
shall not affect the agreement between and among the parties executing the agreement.
ACCEPrANCE OF REsTIuCTIONS
SIGNATURE of this Agreement constitutes acceptance of all grant conditions, grant
restrictions, and the terms of all applicable laws.
DPS COOPERATIVE WORKING AGREEMENT REoUIRED LANGUAGE
THIS is to certify that the objectives of the Tarrant County Auto Theft Task Force
as stated in its Grant Application for the fiscal year(s) covered by this agreement have been
reviewed and that it is mutually agreed to cooperate to whatever extent is necessary in
carrying out the work plan described in the application(s).
ADDmONALL Y, each participating agency and entity is cognizant of the grant and
agrees to abide by any and all rules or special conditions in relation to the application.
BUDGETARY MATIERS
As part of this agreement, all participating entities entitled to reimbursement will
be reimbursed for their participation in this program by grant funds, through the grant's
financial officer (This is presently Jimmy C. Causey, Auditor, Tarrant County, but is
subject to change by Tarrant County. If changed, the change will be made in accordance
with the grant and all participating entities will be advised in writing.) according to the
entity's applicable submitted budget schedule, to the extent that the budget schedule is
consistent with the grant. To the extent that the budget schedule is inconsistent with the
e grant, the grant controls.
THE TARRANT COUNTY AUTO Tllliltw., TASK FORCE
INTERLocAL AsSISTANCE AGREEMENf
Page 9
e
tit
-
PARTICIPATING entities may bill the financial officer for reimbursement monthly or
at such periodic intervals as are appropriate and in accordance with the grant.
CONFIDENTIAL FuNDs
THE Governor's Auto Theft Prevention Authority Fraud Guidelines, hereinafter
referred to as the ATPAFG, will be utilized for the disbursement and reimbursement of
confidential funds.
EQUAL EMPWYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM CERTIFICATION
THE city law enforcement agency (or other law enforcement entity here signing along
with Tarrant County) certifies that:
EITHER the city law enforcement agency (or other law enforcement entity here
signing along with Tarrant County) employees 50 or more people and has received or
applied to the Automobile Theft Prevention Authority, Office of the Governor for total
funds in excess of $25,000, in which case the city law enforcement agency (or other law
enforcement entity signing along with Tarrant County) certifies that it has formulated an
equal employment opportunity program in accordance with 28 CFR 42.301 et seq., Subpart
E and that it is on file in the office of:
NAME
TITLE
ADDRESS
THE TARRANT COUNfY AUf 0 TJlliI4T TASK FORCE
INTERLocAL AsSISTANCE AGREEMENT
Page 1 0
e
.
e
~
or, if the above is left blank, the city law enforcement agency (or other law enforcement
entity here signing along with Tarrant County) certifies that it is not required by the terms
of this grant or the laws applicable thereto to have such a plan on file in order to
participate in this grant.
THE Tarrant County Judge certifies that:
TARRANT County employs 50 or more people and has received or applied to the
Automobile Theft Prevention Authority, Office of the Governor for total funds in excess
of $25,000; therefore, Tarrant County has formulated and equal employment opportunity
program in accordance with 28 CFR 42.301 et seq., Subpart E and that it is on file in the
office of:
GERALD WRIGHT
DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES
100 East Weatherford Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76196.
Said plan or plans are on file and available for review or audit by an official of the
Automobile Theft Prevention Authority, Office of the Governor as required by relevant
laws and regulations.
THE TARRANT COUNTY AUTO THEFr TASK FORCE
INTERLocAL AsSISTANCE AGREEMENT
Page 11
e
.
-
SIGNED ON THE DATES BEWW SHOWN.
WITNESSEm:
COUNTY OF TARRANT, TEXAS
TOM VANDERGRIFF,
COUNTY JUDGE
DATE
TARRANT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
DAVID WILLIAMS,
TARRANT COUNTY SHERIFF
DATE
TARRANT COUNTY CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATIORNEY'S OFFICE
TIM: CURRY,
CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY
DATE
OTHER SIGNING ENTITY:
NAME OF ENTITY:
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED OmCIAL
DATE
TITLE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY FOR ABOVE-LISTED
NON-COUNTY ENTITY
DATE
THE TARRANT COUNTY AUTO THEFr TASK FORCE
INTERLocAL AssISTANCE AGREEMENT
Page 1 2
e
e
-
NONSUPPLANTING CERTIFICATION OF PARTICIPATING
AGENCIES OTHER THAN GRANTEE
TEXAS Civil Statutes, article 4413 (32a), section 6 (a) (7), requires that state funds
provided by this Act shall not be used to supplant state or local funds. Public Law 98-473
requires that federal funds provided by that Act shall not be used to supplant state or local
funds.
THE city law enforcement agency (or other law enforcement entity here signing along
with Tarrant County) certifies that A1PA funds will not be used to replace stille or local
funds t1ult would be tnailab1e in the absence of A1PA funds.
NAME
TITLE
(CITY OR LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITY)
(Note: Tarrant County's certification is incorporated in each grantee's report of
expenditure and status of funds.)
(This form was last updated on June S, 1996.)
THE TARRANT COUNTY Auro TìIKfI~' TASK FORCE
INTERLocAL AsSISTANCE AGREEMENf
Page 1 3
e
PART V ASSURANCES FOR NON-COUNTY ENTITY
(Tarrant County's are included in the Grant Application)
The Applicant hereby assures and certifies that he will comply with the regulation, policies, guidelines
and requirements including OMB Circulars No. A-122, A-llO, A-I02, and A-87, as they relate to the
application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally-assisted project. Also the Applicant
assures and certifies to the grant that:
1. It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant; that a resolution, motion or similar action has
been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the applicant's governing body, authorizing the
tiling of the application including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and
directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to
act in connection with the application and to provide such additional information as may be
required.
2. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (p. L. 88-352) and in accordance with
Title VI of the Act, no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or
national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise
subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant receives
Federal Financial assistance and will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this
agreement.
3.
It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d)- prohibiting
employment discrimination where (1) the primary purpose of a grant is to provide employment
or (2)discriminatory employment practices will result in unequal treatment of persons who are
or should be benefiting from the grant-aided activity.
.
4. It will comply with requirements of the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (P. L. 91-646) which provides for fair and equitable treatment
of persons displaced as a result of Federal and federally assisted programs.
5. It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limit the political activity of employees.
6. It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours provisions of the Federal Fair Labor
Standards Act, as they apply to hospital and educational institution employees of State and local
governments.
7. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that
is or gives the appearance of being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or
others, particularly those with whom they have family, business, or other ties.
8. It will give the sponsoring agency or the Comptroller General through any authorized
representative the access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents
relatèd to the grant.
9. It will comply with all requirements imposed by the Federal sponsoring agency concerning
special requirements of law, program requirements, and other administrative requirements.
10.
It will insure that the facilities under its ownership, lease or supervision which shall be utilized
in the accomplishment of the project are not listed on the Environmental Protections Agency's
(EP A) list of Violating Facilities and that it will notify the Federal grantor agency of the receipt
-
THE TARRANT COUNTY AUf 0 TßEIt'T TASK FORCE
INTERLocAL AsSISTANCE AGREEMENT
Page 14
e
of any communication from the Director of the EP A Office of Federal Activities indicating that
a facility to be used in the project is under consideration for listing by the EP A.
11.
It will comply with the flood insurance purchase requirements of 102 (a) of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 93-234, 87 Stat. 975, approved December 31, 1976. Section
102 (a) requires, on and after March 2, 1975, the purchase of flood insurance in communities
where such insurance is available as a condition for the receipt of any Federal rmancial
assistance for construction or acquisition proposed for use in any area that has been identified
by the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development as an area having
special flood hazards.
The phrase "Federal rmancial assistance" includes any form ofloan, grant, guaranty, insurance
payment, rebate, subsidy, disaster assistance loan or grant, or any other form of direct or
indirect Federal assistance.
12. It will assist the Federal grantor agency in its compliance with 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 as amended (16 U.S.C. 470), Executive Order 11593, and the
Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 469a-l et seq.) by (a) consulting
with the State Historic Preservation Officer on the conduct of investigations, as necessary, to
identify properties listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places
that are subject to adverse effects (see 36 CFR Part 800.8) by the activity, and notifying the
Federal grantor agency of the existence of any such properties, and by (b) complying with all
requirements established by the Federal grantor agency to avoid or mitigate adverse effects upon
such properties.
e
13.
It will comply with the Uniform Grant and Contract Management Standards (UGCMS)
developed under the directive of the Uniform Grant and Contract Management Act of 1981,
Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4413 (32g).
14. It, if a county, has taken or will take action necessary to provide the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice and the Department of Public Safety any criminal history records maintained
by the county in the manner specified for the purposed of those departments.
NON-COUNTY ENTITY
ASSURANCES CERTIFICATION
I certify that the programs proposed in this application meet all the requirements of the
Texas Automobile Theft Prevention Authority Program, that all the information presented
is correct, and that the applicant will comply with the provisions of the Automobile Theft
Prevention Authority and all other federal and state laws, regulations, and guidelines. By
appropriate language incorporated in each grant, subgrant, or other document under which
funds are to be disbursed, the undersigned shall assure that the applicable conditions above
apply to all recipients of assistance.
e
Authorized Official
Date
THE TARRANT COUNTY AUTO THEn TASK FORCE
INTERLocAL AsSISTANCE AGREEMENT
Page 1 5
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Public Works
Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way for
Subject: Rumfield Road Street and Drainage Improvem~mts.
Phase I
Agenda Number:
7/22/96
PU 96-57
Council Meeting Date:
Engineering plans and construction documents are currently being prepared for Rumfield Road,
Phase I (from Spring Oaks Drive to Precinct Line Road). Street right-of-way and drainage
easement will only be required from one property owner.
Dr. and Mrs. Thomas W. Harris own the property which is Tract 1 B, Rumfield Survey, A-1365
(12.292 ac.) They have agreed to sell the required 66,418 square feet of right-of-way (1.52 ac.)
to the City in exchange for not being assessed for the cost of the street and drainage
improvements. The agreed purchase price is $20,000 or $0.30 per square foot. This price
seems reasonable since the Harris's sold right-of-way to the Texas Department of Transportation
for the Precinct Line Road project adjacent to their property for $0.57 per square foot.
Funding Source: The total budget for this project is $655,500. Currently, bonds have been sold
in the amount of $100,000 to fund engineering. The remaining $555,500 needed for right-of-way
and construction was planned to be funded through next year's bond sale. The City Manager and
the property owner have had several meetings and were able to reach an agreement much earlier
than originally planned. The budget will need to be revised as shown below to transfer $20,000
of the 1996 bond funds for engineering to right-of-way.
ORIGINAL BUDGET REVISED BUDGET
1996 Bond Sale 1997 Bond Sale 1996 Bond Sale 1997 Bond Sale
Engineering $98,400 $ 78,400 $ 20,000
Right-of-Way 1,600 $ 63,400 21 ,600 43,600
Construction 492,100 492,100
Total $100,000 $555,500 $100,000 $555,500
Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve the purchase of right-of-way from Dr. and
Mrs. Harris for $20,000 in exchange for their remaining property not being assessed for the cost
of the street and drainage improvements to Rumfield Road and approve the revision to the
1995/96 Capital Projects Budget as shown above.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
su~nt Funds Ava' Ie
~
20-02-05-6000
ure
CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM
Finan"" Ohcto<
Page 1 of
·
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEED
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
That we, Thomas W. Harris and wife, Mary Anne Harris, as Seller, for and in
consideration of the agreed purchase price of TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND
NO/100 ($20,000.00), and upon all of the terms and conditions hereof, hereby grant, sell
and convey to the City of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation of Tarrant County,
Texas as Buyer, a perpetual right-of-way for the purpose of constructing, improving,
widening, maintaining and using a public street with drainage facilities as may be required
and the further rights to construct, improve, operate and maintain water, sewer, or other
public utilities in, under or upon said right-of-way, as described on the plat attached hereto
on Exhibit D, which plat is made a part hereof, and described on the attached Exhibit A,
by metes and bounds.
The agreed purchase price includes full accord, satisfaction and compensation for
all demands of the Seller, subject also to the following special conditions, if any:
The remainder of Seller's property as described herein will not be assessed
for any part of the cost of the Rumfield Road Extension Project from Precinct
Line Road to Spring Oak Drive.
·
To have and hold the same perpetually to the City of North Richland Hills and its
successors and assigns forever.
Executed this the /d..;Æ day of ~/7 ,A.D., 19~
fTTJ..~ w. 1Ia/T/r~
Thomas W. Harris
~~-~
a e Harris
SELLER(S)
ADDRESS OF GRANTEE:
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76180
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
~s instrument was acknowledged before me on this the /~ t-I, day of
,1996, by Thomas W. Harris and wife, Mary Anne Harris.
I
NOla~~;SI: O~~
My Commission Expires:
Notary's Printed Name:
·
~~
~ ~ Cf7
f'1arf $~a cI/~
.\\11111'" ,
"..~~':-.~.:.~~~.. '
~' ....:;~y~..,.'é'.,
i:' .·~n' .~
; /~ ~\.
:: . ~~.~..,? '.
:: i ~ /,'f:....... :
:; : 04 :J.:q "':
~~ \.,,^- ,.~/.:-....
~ '. "(.·-o-:·~:.." ..
'\",..::~f~'··"" ,
Hams2.row
Page 1 of 2
·
KEF NO. 3-381, PARCEL NO.1
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
RUMFIELD ROAD, STREET AND
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
EXHIBIT "A"
PERMANENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WA Y
0, RUMFIELD SURVEY, A-1365
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILL.S
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being a strip of
land out of the O. Rumfield Survey, Abstract No. 1365, said strip being out of a tract of
land conveyed to Thomas W. Harris with William D. Tate referenced as trustee by deed
as recorded in Volume 6485, Page 122 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas
(D.R.T.C.T.>, said strip of land being herein described as a proposed 70 foot wide
Permanent Street Right-of-Way and being herein more particularly described by metes
and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the easterly property line of the remainder of the said Harris
tract and on the existing westerly right-of-way line of State of Texas Highway right-of-way
for Precinct Line Road as recorded in Volume 11884, Page 1944 of the D.R.T.C.T., said
point being located South 00 degrees 55 minutes 32 seconds West 275.84 feet and South
21 degrees 43 minutes 28 seconds East 80.78 feet from a right-of-way monument at the
intersection of the northerly property line of the said Harris tract and the said existing
westerly right-of-way line of Precinct Line Road;
THENCE, South '05 degrees 38 minutes 00 seconds East, along the said existing westerly
right-of-way line of Precinct Line Road, 90.19 feet to a point;
THENCE, North 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 19.76 feet to a point;
·
THENCE, North 89 degrees 49 minutes 51 seconds West 87.01 feet to a point at the
beginning of a curve to the right whose center bears North 00 degrees 10
minutes 09 seconds East 835.00 feet;
THENCE, in a westerly direction along the said curve, through a central angle of 29
degrees 58 minutes 12 seconds and an arc length of 436.77 feet to a point;
THENCE, North 59 degrees 51 minutes 39 seconds West 371.52 feet to a point;
THENCE, South 72 degrees 10 minutes 40 seconds West 13.60 feet to a point at the
beginning of a curve to the left whose center bears South 67 degrees 32 minutes
04 seconds East 170.00 feet;
THENCE, in a southerly direction along the said curve, through a central angle of 23
degrees 38 minutes 18 seconds and an arc length of 70.14 feet to a point on the
existing easterly right-of-way line of a 60 foot wide Street Right-of-Way conveyed
to the City of North Richland Hills as Spring Oak Drive by deed as recorded in
Volume 12311, Page 2256 of the D,R.T,C.T.;
THENCE, North 01 degree 10 minutes 36 seconds West, along the said existing easterly
right-of-way line, 167.34 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the right
whose center bears South 25 degrees 16 minutes 55 seconds West 830.00 feet;
THENCE, in a southeasterly direction along the said curve, through angle of 4 degrees 51
minutes 26 seconds and an arc length of 70.36 feet to a point;
THENCE, South 59 degrees 51 minutes 39 seconds East 374.06 feet to a point at the
beginning of a curve to the left whose bears North 30 degrees 08 minutes 21
seconds East 765.00 feet;
THENCE, in an easterly direction along the said curve, through a central angle of 29
degrees 58 minutes 12 seconds and an arc length of 400.15 feet to a point;
·
THENCE, South 89 degrees 49 minutes 51 seconds East 86.83 feet to a point;
THENCE, North 41 degrees 20 minutes 53 seconds East 7.70 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
The proposed Permanent Street Right-of-Way being herein described contains 1.5247
acres (66,418 square feet) of land, more or less.
Page 2 of 2
.
KEF NO. 3-381. PARCEL NO.1
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
RlTMFIELD ROAD, STREET AND
DRAI:\AGE ThlPROVEMENTS
EXHIBIT "A" (continued)
PERMANENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WA Y
O. RUMFIELD SURVEY, A-1365
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
.
TO ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN TITLE TO THE PREMISES SURVEYED, I DO HEREBY
CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED FROM PUBLIC
RECORDS AND FROM AN ACTUAL AND ACCURATE SURVEY UPON THE GROUND AND
THAT SAME IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
Company Name: Spooner and Associates, Inc.
By, J!L~
Shaun Spooner
Registered Professional Land Surveyor,
Texas No, 4183
Date of Survey 2-22-95
Revised on 7-08-96
.
PARCEL 1 KEF NO. 3-381-616
RL!1'/FIELD ROAD, STREET
& DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
SURVEY: O. RUMFIELD, A-1365
LOCA TlON: TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
PROPERTY ACQUISITlON:
PERMANENT STREET R.O.W.: 1.5247 AC.
PERMANENT DRAINAGE ESMT.: 0.2429 AC.
.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
7301 NE: LOOP 820
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118
DRAWING OF EXHIBITS" A", "B" & "e"
EXHIBIT "0"
S. RICHARDSON SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO. 1266
I THOMAS W. HARRIS
~1W1LLIAM D. TATE, TRUSTEE srATEOF'TEXAS
VOL. 6485 PG. 122 HIGHWAY R,O,....
, VOL. 11884. pç, 19+4
1_ D.R.T-C.T. o.R.r,c.r.
- - 7- - - ~o~ ~ ..;
! o~· I,.
~ ¡¡;I~
EXHiBIT -8- 0 g
..... ............0 PROPOSED 90' 'MDE ¿ CII ~
1 ~ PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT g
\ ..... ~,. f,";\~1 0.1464 AC. (6.379 SQ. FT.) I:.. ~
~ ..... ®I ,~ c: N
3i ~ ~ 0 ......... ~) P.O.B. ~ ~
\ ci( - ~ .....@ ~/@2 EX.!'i~~IT CII
\ "'I~\ '~
\ I ~ I \ O. RUMFlElD SURVEY .... l -
8 \ ë§ I \ ABSTRACT NO. 1365 @ -....:...:::.:9~...:..
is \ c:> \ ~@ ~ 'ÍÌ'
r:i ... z \ , I..... r.;;..6 It:JI
~g:; ë2 \ @,,,@ ~ ~_
,¡,.: a.. -!' \ J23,93'
W:..; I en I ç. \ EXHIBIT .c.
~~o W~~~ \ PROPOSED 95' WIDE P.O.B.
~~ ~ ,,~~~ \ PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXHIBIT
:a eo' '1'~' C'''' \ 0.0965 AC, (4,203 SQ. FT.) ·c·
". -0-0,""
\ '1'..1'1' ~ \
-.. - \' ~~~ '\ ----------"1---
CTY OF NOftni RlCHLANO HILLS
STREET R,O.W,
VOL. 12311. PG. 2256
O.R. T. C. T.
l/ERNON L. JACKSON
BRÐlOA K. JACKSON
VOL. 10329. PC. 1 .1V
O,R, r.c. T.
--------
~
PL
EXHIBIT ·A·
PROPOSED 70' WIDE
PERMANENT STREET RIGHT-Of-WAY
1.52+7 AC. (66,418 SQ. FT.)
. P.O.B.
. EXHIBIT
·A-
10.31'
: NS'Jð'W
a
4:
0
œ:
I
I w
Z
~ :J
~I
I t-
U
I Z
U
I W
. œ:
;1 a..
0
oi
.
UNE TABLE
CURVE TABLE
SOS·38'OO·E 90.19'
N45·OO'OO·W 19.76'
N89·,WS1·W 87.01'
NS9'51'39-W 371.52'
S7210'.4{)-W 13.60'
N0110'36-W 167.3~'
559'S1'39-E 374,06'
S89"49'SI-E 86.83'
N41'20'S3-E 7.70'
N2S·S8'OS·E 70.00'
S64'OI'SS-E 90.00'
S2S·S8·OS·W 70.00'
S2S'58'05-W 45.28'
N64'01'S5·W 95.00'
N2S'58'OS·E 45.00'
D - 29'58'12- R - 835.00'
D - 6'31'20- R - 835.00'
D - 23'38'18· R .. 170.00'
D - 4'51'26· R.. 830.00'
D - 6·......·~1· R - 765.00'
D - 29'58'12· R - 765.00'
L ... 436.77'
L - 9S.0S'
L .. 70.1. .'
L .. 70.36'
L .. 90.05'
L .. 400.1S'
o 150' 300'
~ !
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
1· = 150'
REVISED ON 7-Qð-M
SPOONER & ASSOC.
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYORS
D. MOSES SURVEY
ABSTRACT NO, 1150
':08 ~JC\.: 4-98- 2- 96
DATE: 4-18-96
CO GO FILE: NONE
ACACt FILE: 498-1
DRA'v\'N BY: S.G.S.
COMPUTED BY: S.G.S.
CHECKED BY: S.G.S.
.
352 HURST BLVD.
HURST, TX 76053
(817) 282-6981
-.
~., " ;.
: .........;; "l~_;' ~~ ~_ ?':
'\ u ~ .
"" "'; I;
f'..-..: I
U . ~~ I . I ~ I f ~
~ I' t,: '! \\ ~./J.
. ~l~ U , --- 'T Ú\ . . U" ~ ~
!~:: -.. ~ . þt . U1 ~ =t7/ l: t .~ ~ I 1¿~ ~
,.... - u?/ ...( ~~ :! :V1 .. ~~"ß \='
~. -..!:! -. . . \\ ,t,- (~. . ~ tr
~. '... -. .... ~'-S> .'
~ \J\C? ~ :¡..O tr
.- ~C"J:.C::;:;- '5 .....
:.= ..."Do ~ I .,.,~
~. ~~~c::;:;- ~ - ~",~I
,0 _" ..' ~ 0 ~, II ~ ê- ~ "1 ~=
. ~ ~ \:::;:::" ~ '; '§ ~ z 1;:
o ::.,
'. ~ ~ /'" I' ~ I
..~ !-. ' . ~; A ~¡ ,I ~~~ I
.';. - ~o . · .."_"
· '\ . : '. ? t:! ,,__
..-.-. . . þ "
~-.. .. ">2': i õ . ,'Q 1<.
. 9 Õ 'L~-"714 . ,,",\ .1;'Þ ~ I '~~\ ~ # :~ ~~ tid
.."" ~ ,'.... ..., .... I c r~ , I" ...
. U (P~ i" ~ "'...J 0#' .0') \J\C? ~ c:Þ E= '" ~~. ~~; c:Þ r- ~7"'-'-;;'- - 1:
,., u. ~ C"J:. n c:Þ I" I \ ':i ~ ~o ,J C'"I, .. ;t :
,... NO r - . -..."D<.0\J\ OW "'" ~'ê' ~ ~ ;; .:~ i:.. . i
~A IIAT ; -:;- .. ~~ I Õ,;- I \"D'Z, _ '.. ".. ,.. .
I' .z ~ - ~ U\~r<\ ~ ~r<\ i;:y::a ... <'r<\ .::þ = t ":-,b~ : :
;>.. u ¡,!i!s'-..... .~ ..0 \J\ ~ I r c..~',£ ro f I~ ~;
, n. '- . ~-'.r .. ~1",cIO II 1....
-- . . - ~ 0 or+- ..,..,', . ~\ ,...-;' N 0 -3
~_.- ~ - - - - - - - - - _'-=.c:=-_ --' _ __-=_ _.;
wi ... 1;( JG ,. 1(,D t9 "') , "1', -.J.CJ : ,'" .II .
J~ ¡,~~~)/~ ~!! (~~: :~ ~ - ." "''':'1 V\" .., ~"'I ,..
~.. - ¡, \ ~ .. ~:D ~
; ~:t r - ~ ~ ~ L~ ~
~:. '..:.. . ..' " /!: (\
.:...~;. uu EYAN OR :" .. ... ... . _ I ~
~~ -~-.~Iõ .~..
· I::¡ 0 fa ... .J'
'- DAYID OR / t
': - ~:: ~ . .. ~ I· .' . _ U ... _ ' /,/,--"""",0 ~ ",
' . ~-- :;: . (t).. ~ . .. .
~w '" ........ . ."
. .. , .U ¡. ..1· .. , .~ ........
::: \~ ~¡:.: ': r 1 ~
...
: :1'.. ' " ~
\ - - ~ ;:~\ - -a'\~nn I
\ð ~ ~;: ~- -.. Õ : _ _.......; 9.. \51. _ ,
~.- .. . % ¡: I~ i .. 0 L:j.. '
lJ) - - -. "Icau CI - - I :-. [-; _ .. I U ... I
.... ~ ;.... --,~ &: ~- L-:L .
--\t~ . . ... ;; ¡:; _ HIALEAH CIA W Y
~~;: ~: I~~.. ;.~.. ~ 0. ~ -T.. ul~J;~.E~~1
- - JUf'R€.Y ST \'Ó\2 :!.. ¡ ~; _ :!;~~ ~ !
: - cg. .. - ~f--"~O> .. .. _ '> ;;; -=---.¡
-.. .... y 0 :.c.... "'" ... ':D - \P ~ ---\ to:Z _
.:: - .. . ~ - ~~ 19- i
.. ~(~-=-' ~ ~. ~~ .. . Æ õ ,
; ~~~ -;-:: ~-:-- ~ "~~~tP'.. - .. f
- ) -.. '---- ~ ~ - l--'.d"-~ . u I ..
U... ~"Jo ~ ...-, Cr tz -:-1 .. ..
... ~.. ... t
-~ ~; :;: þ.
0" ..
0_ ~;: i
~.. (' r.
-. -.
- II
-- . ~
o·
0_ I ."
." .-
~ . n
I
I
-
u_
.
. .
n_
-,
.~ v;. ..
... ~ .~'7.... ....
~ ~"" -
...
.
-.
:;:
~~
;
-"
.
.
:;:
!
..
.
.
-.
-,'
Crt7/ =
,I~ n
I
~-< -....
~
"'4-
"?s>
: l
-
.
.. ~
- ..,
u
- ,...
· ~ Z ..
Õ .=\- -
STEYE DA
· .~õ =~;
-
1«:,: ;." ~
m···o - :~
. - _ _ _ 0
, u . w .. Þ'
'"
< u
~IDGE OR _ ~ 'g;
_ I .. I .. I " ::¡ .
..
or ~-.JOHN CT
,~:: + '; ',' ,'. . ~/
~~ _ .. r,
.. ......~. I u : '."
a i:; . :: :: ~ ;;
(<0 ~ /:: - õ
'JI 1).. g I u" ' _ ^
. ..
,
.r...
(0.
~-'.I'
CO
~<¡;;
\;
"'.r
~
~
~
-<
'90
~.
'»
,
\
, -
..
..
..
l\) ~
";1
";
'-
.
;;
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Finance / Support Services
Council Meeting Date:
7/22/96
Subject:
Authorization to Purchase Fuel on "Spot Market Basis" Agenda Number:
PU 96-58
For several years City Council has authorized the City Manager and Staff to purchase
gasoline and diesel fuel on a "spot market basis." This method involves obtaining three
bids over the telephone and awarding the bid to the low bidder. In the past this
method has proved to be the most cost effective way to purchase fuel.
Recommendation: It is recommended City Council authorize the City Manager and Staff
to purchase gasoline and diesel fuel on a "spot market basis."
Finance Review
Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
06-01-03-2960
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget -X
Other
Flnanco Direct'"
Page 1 of
.'
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date:
Approve Amended Interlocal Agreement concerning
Subject: North Tarrant Parkway (Wilson I anA) Right-of-W~y Agenda Number:
Dedication and Drainage Improvements between City
of North Richland Hills and City of Keller - Resolution No. 96-48
7/22/96
PW 96-36
This interlocal agreement was originally approved by Council on March 25, 1996 (PW 96-18). It
outlines the responsibilities concerning the proposed box culvert and drainage improvement
construction on North Tarrant Parkway (Wilson Road) along our common boundary with Keller.
The amendment to the original interlocal agreement involves the addition of paragraph 2, Keller
Drainage Pipe Construction. This describes who will be responsible for the installation of a
72-inch storm drain along the north side of North Tarrant Parkway. This will not add any
additional costs to North Richland Hills' share. The City Council of Keller approved this amended
interlocal agreement at their July 2, 1996 meeting.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends City Council approve the Amended Interlocal Agreement with the City of Keller
(Resolution No. 96-48).
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Finance Director
t Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
City Manager
Page 1 of
·
RESOLUTION NO. 96-48
Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that:
1.
The Mayor be, and is hereby authorized to execute the attached amended interlocal
agreement with the City of Keller concerning right-of-way dedication, box culvert construction,
72-inch storm drain installation and drainage improvement cost participation on North Tarrant
Parkway (Wilson Lane) from the City's westerly city limits east to a point approximately 2,600 feet
(or 900 feet west of Smithfield Road).
PASSED AND APPROVED this 22nd day of July, 1996.
Tommy Brown, Mayor
· ATTEST:
·
Patricia Hutson, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City
·
AMENDED INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF WILSON LANE (NORTH T ARRANT PARKWAY)
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
STATE OF TEXAS }{
COUNTY OF TARRANT }{
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the City of Keller,
Texas, a home rule municipal corporation, located in Tarrant County, Texas (hereinafter
referred to as "Keller") and the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, a home rule
municipal corporation, located in Tarrant County, Texas (hereinafter referred to as
"NRH").
WITNESSTH
·
WHEREAS, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791 of the Texas
Government Code authorizes city governments of the State of Texas to contract with one
another for various governmental functions and the delivery of governmental services,
including those in the area of public health, sanitation, utility services; and
WHEREAS, a certain portion of Wilson Lane (North Tarrant Parkway)
beginning from a point approximately 150 feet east of Cat Mountain Trail and continuing
in an easterly direction 2,900 feet to the west line of Sarah Brooks Estates Subdivision
and lying between the cities of Keller and NRH is to be improved by Tarrant County,
Precinct No.3, thereby requiring the construction of drainage improvements to increase
the Wilson Lane drainage capacity; thus, requiring that drainage improvements be
completed by both Keller and NRH; and
WHEREAS, both Keller and NRH desire to have Wilson Lane improved and
recognizes the need to improve storm drainage in both cities as required for said street to
be improved; and
WHEREAS, the Governing Bodies of both Keller and NRH have previously
agreed to share equally the cost of engineering and design services for the Wilson Lane
drainage improvements; and
·
WHEREAS, Keller and NRH intend to share equally in the construction cost of
installing a three-barrel ten foot by five foot (I 0' x 5') box culvert and necessary
appurtenances thereto within a portion of the Wilson Lane right-of-way; and
·
WILSON LANE AGREEMENT - KELLERJNRH
Page 2
WHEREAS, NRH will dedicate right-of-way as needed up to a width of two
hundred feet (200') for the 2,900 feet of Wilson Lane improvements prior to awarding of
bids for the construction of the box culvert; and
WHEREAS, Keller and NRH intend to make their respective drainage
improvements on either side of the three-barrel box culvert constructed in Wilson Lane;
and
WHEREAS, Keller and NRH mutually agree to amend the Interlocal Cooperative
Agreement for the Construction of Wilson Lane (North Tarrant Parkway) Drainage
Improvements, executed March 14, 1996 by both parties, to reflect additional
improvements as shown in paragraph 2 hereto; and
WHEREAS, Keller and NRH mutually desire to be subject to the provisions of
the Interlocal Cooperation Act and other applicable statutes and contracts pursuant
thereto.
·
NOW, THEREFORE, for the mutual consideration herein stated, Keller and NRH
agree as follows:
1. Construction. Keller and NRH agree to share equally in the cost of constructing a
three-barrel ten foot by five foot (10' x 5') box culvert and necessary appurtenances
thereto within the right-of-way of Wilson Lane (North Tarrant Parkway) in accordance
with the jointly-approved plans and specifications prepared by Knowlton, English and
Flowers. NRH agrees, that prior to awarding a construction bid for the box culvert, it will
dedicate the required two hundred (200') of right-of-way necessary for Wilson Lane to
Tarrant County. The right-of-way width dedicated not to exceed two hundred (200') feet.
2. Keller Draina~e Pipe Construction. The City of Keller and Tarrant County, Precinct
3, will be responsible for the installation of approximately seven hundred (700') feet of
seventy-two (72") inch reinforced concrete pipe. The County will install the pipe, and
Keller will furnish the pipe, embedment materials and rental of equipment.
3. Project Administration. Keller agrees to advertise for the box culvert construction
bids, review and award said construction contract following approval by NRH. NRH
agrees to reimburse Keller for one half of the total cost of the construction of the box
culvert and its necessary appurtenances. Any additional drainage improvements
· negotiated for by either city with the contractor shall be paid solely by that city.
·
WILSON LANE AGREEMENT - KELLERlNRH
Page 3
4. NRH Indemnification. NRH hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold Keller, its
elected officials, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, and assigns, harmless against all
claims, damages, liabilities, injuries to person and property, including death, demands or
suits, including costs and attorneys fees, for any claim or suit brought within the City
Limits of NRH or south of the Wilson Lane arising from the drainage improvements and
construction of the three-barrel ten foot by five foot (10' x 5') box culvert and necessary
appurtenances thereto.
5. Keller Indemnification. Keller hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold NRH, its
elected officials, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, and assigns, harmless against all
claims, damages, liabilities, injuries to person and property, including death, demands or
suits, including costs and attorneys fees, for any claim or suit brought within the City
Limits of Keller or north of Wilson Lane arising from the drainage improvements and
construction of the three-barrel ten foot by five foot (10' x 5') box culvert and necessary
appurtenances thereto.
·
6. NRH agrees that upon the completion and acceptance of the box culvert and the
improvements to Wilson Lane by Tarrant County, Precinct 3, and the expiration of the
maintenance bond, the routine general maintenance of said box culvert shall be the
responsibility of NRH by maintaining the improvements or contracting with Tarrant
County for the maintenance.
7. This Agreement and any of its terms and provisions, as well as rights and duties of the
parties hereto shall be governed by the law of the State of Texas. In the event that any
cause of action is filed by either party arising out of the terms of this Agreement, venue
for said lawsuit shall be in Tarrant County, Texas.
8. In the event that any portion of this Agreement shall be found to be contrary to law, it
is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining portions shall remain valid and in full
force and effect to the extent possible.
9. The undersigned officers and/or agents of the parties hereto are the properly
authorized officials and have the necessary authority to execute this Agreement on behalf
of the parties hereto, and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary
resolutions or orders extending said authority have been duly passed and are now in full,force and effect.
·
·
WILSON LANE AGREEMENT - KELLER/NRH
Page 4
EXECUTED in multiple originals this the -'- day of -:5" U L Y
,1996.
CITY OF KELLER
~~k~l!r,~
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this L day of .su L 1 ' 1996.
~~&æ-~~
Notary ublic in and or the St te of Texas
My Commission Expires:
·
1- /6 - ctuJoo
611£/ L.# ..sr¿pTI£.N$
Type or Print Notary's Name
Approved as to Fonn and Legality:
~er
·
·
WILSON LANE AGREEMENT - KELLERlNRH
Page 5
CITY OF NORTH RlCHLAND HILLS
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the _ day of
,1996.
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
My Commission Expires:
Type or Print Notary's Name
· Approved as to Fonn andLegality:
Attorney for the City of North
RicWand Hills
·
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
_Department:
Public Works
Council Meeting Date:
Subject: Interlocal Agreement for Rllmfielrl Ro;::¡rl, Ph;::¡~e I
Agenda Number:
7/22/96
PW 96-37
The attached agreement facilitates the construction of Rumfield Road, Phase I from Precinct Line
Road west approximately 1200 feet to the proposed Spring Oak Drive. Commissioner Bob
Hampton has agreed to assist in the construction. This agreement addresses each parties'
responsibility.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council approve this agreement.
_
Finance Review
Finan.. Director
nt Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
-..
Page 1 of
/
/
e THE STATE OF TEXAS
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
COUNTY OF TARRANT
CONTRACT
e
This Agreement made and entered into this the day of
1996, by and between the County of Tarrant,
acting herein by and through its governing body the Commissioners'
Court, hereinafter referred to as TARRANT COUNTY, and the City of
North Richland Hills acting herein by and through its governing
body, hereinafter referred to as THE CITY, both of Tarrant County,
State of Texas, witnesseth:
WHEREAS, this Agreement is made under the authority granted by
and pursuant to Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the party or parties paying for the performance of
governmental functions or services shall make payments therefore
from current revenues available to the paying party; and,
WHEREAS, the governing bodies of the two parties find that the
project or undertaking is necessary for the benefit of the public
and that each party has the legal authority to build or maintain
the project or to provide such service, and the construction and
improvement thereof is in the common interest of both parties
hereto; and that the division of costs provided for constitutes
adequate consideration to each party; set proj ect being more
particularly described as:
e
e
o Construction of Rumfield Road from Precinct Line Road
West for a distance of 1100 feet to Spring Oaks Drive.
WHEREAS, the parties hereto, in order to facilitate the
financing and construction of the needed facility, and in order to
share the costs of having said work to be done have agreed to share
in the financing of said construction as hereinafter stated in
detail.
The CITY hereby agrees that the CITY alone is responsible for
the engineering, drainage and maintenance of this project. The
CITY must notify the COUNTY within thirty days of the completion of
this project of any complaint the CITY has with the project. The
CITY recognizes that the COUNTY will rely on the CITY to prepare
e all plans and specifications for the project. By signature of the
CITY official hereto, the CITY represents to the COUNTY that the
project, if properly constructed, will not adversely impact any
other person.
For and in consideration of the mutual undertaking hereinafter
set forth and for adequate consideration given, the parties agree
as follows:
l. TARRANT COUNTY agrees to construct Rumfield Road from
Precinct Line Road for a distance of 1100 ft. to Spring
Oaks Drive. The work will include: clearing the work area
of vegetation, cutting/filling to prescribed subgrade,
stabilization of subgrade to a depth of 10" and
application of a 10" hot mix asphalt concrete surface.
e
e
e
-
2. TARRANT COUNTY agrees to provide all labor and equipment
necessary to accomplish the construction.
3. The CITY agrees to pay for the actual cost of the
materials necessary to accomplish the construction.
4. The CITY agrees that it will be responsible for the
installation/construction of all stormwater drainpipe,
drop inlets for stormwater drainpipe, retaining walls and
all curb and gutters for this project.
5. The CITY agrees to mark, and as necessary, to move all
public utilities that may interfere with the work to be
done by Tarrant County.
6. The CITY agrees to furnish a dump site for all
construction waste generated by Tarrant County on this
project.
7. The CITY agrees to acquire drainage easements
necessary to remove standing water from the project
alignment before the start of vegetation removal.
8. The CITY agrees it will be responsible for traffic control
on this project. This responsibility includes all
construction signage, barricades and flagmen necessary to
control traffic in and around the construction site.
By entering into this Agreement the parties do not create any
obligations express or implied other than those set forth herein
and this Contract shall not create any rights in parties not
signatories hereto.
The parties to this Agreement do not intend by this Agreement
that any specific third party may obtain a right by virtue of the
4IÞ execution or performance of this Agreement. CITY agrees that the
COUNTY is relying on the CITY for notice of when to proceed with
this project, but this Agreement does not require the County to do
this project with any particular time frame.
This Agreement shall terminate automatically upon happening of
any of the following events:
1. The completion of the improvement provided for herein or;
2. At the end of one (1) year from date herein, unless
renewed by both parties in writing.
By:
Authorized City Official
ATTEST: CITY
4IÞ
TARRANT COUNTY:
ATTEST: COUNTY
TOM VANDERGRIFF, County Judge
BOB HAMPTON, Commissioner
Precinct Three
APPROVAL:
District Attorney's Office
e
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
"
Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date:
Approve Final Pay Estimate NO.5 in the Amount
Subject: of $128,002 55 to Austin Bridge & Ro::!d Co . In~ Agenda Number:
for Hightower Drive, Section "A 1" Paving & Drainage
Improvements
7/22/96
PA'!' 96-06,
This CIP project was awarded by Council on 11/13/95, PW 95-70 for $553,141.72 to Austin
Bridge & Road Co., Inc. Final payment will make the contractor's total earnings on the project
$517,135.69, which is $51,825.03 under the contract amount. The reasons for the savings are
unused temporary asphalt paving, fencing, off-site channel excavation, and miscellaneous
contingency funds included in this contract.
The contractor has an outstanding invoice owed to the City in the amount of $1,166.87 (repair of
traffic signal). The contractor is aware of this invoice and has requested that it be withheld from
the final pay, The final payment to contractor will then be $128,002.55 ($129,169.42 less
$1,166.87).
The contractor substantially completed this project on May 23, 1996. The contract completion
date was June 1, 1996. The project is now totally complete with all final adjustments having been
made.
Funding Source:
4
Sufficient funds were previously appropriated by Council action with the approval of the 1995/96
CIP Budget and through agreements and assessments from adjacent property owners.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends Council approve final payment to Austin Bridge & Road Co., Inc. in the amount
of $128,002.55 ($129,169.42 less $1,166.87).
Finance Review
Acct. Number _?2-01-04-6000 02-64-06-6000
Sufficient Funds a' able
Finan"" Director
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
//
Page 1 of
·
·
·
~~
.....~
~i
~~
......
,!!!
~
~
~ ~
£0116
'- <::> ~
11:<O"=::
c::t
€C\ ~
o OJ c::
~õ.!!!
.c:
Õ IX) _~
òcjCl::
GQ<:
<.>
.s
~ Q)
~ c c
It.Q ~
~ -~ 1: 01 Qa
~ a .~ g ~
~bJ~~
:g'~~x~
Il:Iro~f..,:~
c Q C") u;
~s::!~i:
:::1U".....ctI=
q:a.....a~
~
::::
¡¡¡
. - - -.' - - .- - ~ -.. -. - --
C)
OJ
.....
<0
'"
~
~
~
~
~
~
<
~
t::
(,)=æ
~~
~~
i2-J
Q~
~~
o
o¡¡:
~a¿:
~~
:ti:
~
m N N N "" V ;(; o:¡ 0()
0 It) m o:¡ co ..... ..... 0
...J .,: cO .n a; ci cO <"Ì a:i M
N It) M 0() ..... C'> <J) o:¡ N
~ .,. N N ... ..... .,. ..... In .....
0 '" ... .... .... ....
l- I
:1
~ r, III
58 'I
~I
æ~ :1
:¡: ¡:: :
9: ffi :1
.:J:> II
~I i
....r,I :5 :5 g :5 g:5 g g I
~8: :;;j ~ ~ ~ ~:;;j ~ ~ :
:, W ... II) 0 .,.. U'J In t;') :
"~___!I_____'_.' __.m__ -----'----'-------' ........--,-.--- ---,----,-,------_.,
!~II :: ~ :: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
~I !
o~ 0 ~ 0
<J)~ co co co
M~ M ~ M
N~ N ~ N
ww M ~ ø
c
o
o
N
....
g
c:i
N
...
§
c:i
N
...
o
C>
°
N
....
Q
C"Í
~
....
at
c:i
~
....
1-1-
_(f)
ZO I
:J (,) I
I
-----. --------.------.--..-.-. -.------ --.--....-.-.- .---..-----. -- ------------....
wi
;ê!
1-:
~,
~¡
0:
-~-'1 -. ----.______..____________________...
I
1-1-:'. O()~ C")v..... MvO) C")on~ Ml()v C")v
_(I), """r"') r--.("'\CI) "t"')~ ......t--t') ~""'M .......M
ZO ....N .oC'ÎM I()N"'; on"';C'Î I/i"';N .oN
::)u: ,....~ ,..~-- ,.....-~ .......-...... ............T- ............
-; i:f-.:~-::.:.·...:-=-=-_:--:-:~:~-··, ~::-
:¡:~¡ ~C> "'Il'!CI CloCl CICIo 0ClCl 0Cl
~:f~ ,.......... 0-..- "-("")N ...........,.... NNC'I NN
-I
Qg
C"ÍM
g
.,.:
GO
c:i
~
I
I
---- ---,-- --- -.- -·----i
,
!
I
C")I()..,....
r-~t")oo
.0 .,.; r-J M
- r r"l"'"
.., .......,.
onv
r-<"I
""':N
... ....
... ...
C")v.....
r-<"Ioo
.oN(")
..... .......
.. ... ..
------ --·-0___- .,___ ___-..I
"'0010
ONMO
00
,...¡ r-~
I() 010
oNo
: 1B i i
! ~ W 0:0 E §
~ Òo u VI ~
5 ~ ~~ ~ ~ eô ~ ~
.... w ~o a ~ ÐW ~ œ
~I 41 .,,;CI) ><-E CI g' ~I-, .:. ~
-, '" Q»- c:-¡ c: 'C: "'~;¡ ,g¡ ìS
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 :¡ '~ -ð U! 'J Ë 111
~ ~o ..,- "" 4IUJ C\ -_.Q
!: ~ 1!<e 'J~ S ~ '5Z·5 60 i :1'
1;:;'1 '7íì ..;80 C:1;I !.! ti~ ~~ tí ~~ '8
:s I '0 <..r) .s... ex .£ &:..e; I !S _ I . ~ ~ _ I) < ~ r. _I
.... !~ E.f@ ~:c¡'Ó ~~ -£i:g@ ~~ 6iQ@ c:ffi ~ .!/Iß~
"'< -S...... !!!c:~ æ" r!!5.... o!!.g ~ë!... i:UJ -~I!I-I
I,ll ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ r ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ 6. ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ :~ ~ ~ ~I
! ~cn ~E~ ]¡;. ~~ ~~~ ~J ~~~ ~~ ~:e'i~¡
c---"- -:"-~-~_,.._<¿~~u~_"'.,,c__ ,~,-~____~ .!-' :;:.___~~__g_,.J_:::::_..__,a:_~_c;._I...1 '=;
=
=
=
=
=
--
- -
--
--
-I: a; aQjiii ita; :¡¡ ~ æ t
~ :~ ¡ i i ¡ ! ~ ~ ! ~ I t~ I
(/): ~iÞ CJCJ4I ~CJ4> 4>~.. ";CJ
cc:w ;1 = 2! ... ~ ~ ... :n~ ~ ~ ~ I- t! ~
~'I ~~ ~!!I\V e"'!!I e,:=!1I Ë~:g
. ulI) ",aJiIi caiiili «I.,4i l1Iu4>
:1 !I: ~ ¡.;;; ~ ~ þ ~ ~ þ -= ~ Þ IS ,~
e m ~ œ ~ ~ ~ œ ~ e œ ~ ~ ~
._. --1:---~'~~,::¡ ::¡_..EL~~_.. -~~-~---~-~..::¡,..
w:1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ,I "" 0 ..... ~ ~
01 0 ..... - - .....
: ~ ~ ;:; ~ ~
,
æiii :ä ~t t itæ
:g-S :Qc:~-S _,~~ :g~~
-š~ ~~~3= -:> 'b:>:>
~~ ~~gg ~~ ~g~
~g ~~~5 ~~ ~~i
þ~ '::Ë~~ ~~ þ~~
.." . !!.... ~." ·.,,111 I
.c1,~ _!!5. t-. ~,~ ,_.t::.:;i,___~_~.:;i_,
~ ~ ~ ~ i
<õ r- ~ ""
S; ~ ~ ~ ¡
I
I"-
co
cD
CD
.....
.....
...
-
!
{!.
"
c:
e
(!)
.
.
.
RECEIVED JUL - 9 1996
.
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 3, 1996
Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E.,
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop. 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: 3-377 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
HIGHTOWER DRIVE, SECTION "A1", PAVING,
DRAINAGE AND SIGNALIZATION IMPROVEMENTS
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.5 & FINAL
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Final Pay Estimate No.5, dated July 3, 1996, made
payable to Austin Bridge & Road Co., Inc., in the amount of $129,169.42 for materials
furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of June 25, 1996.
The quantities and conditions of the project have been verified on-site by your representative,
Mr. Fred Durko, as indicated by his signature on the estimate dated June 26, 1996, and we
have checked the item extensions and additions.
The following is a summary to the project status to date:
TOTAL CONTRACT PERCENT
BREAKDOWN THIS MONTH EARNINGS AMOUNT COMPLETE
(Incl. Retalnagel
Paving $ 100.252.43 $ 266,783.60 $ 267.956,83 99.56
Drainage 18,121.75 168,445.00 207.796.00 81.06
Water 2,854.21 38,084.20 43,191.50 88.18
Signalization 7,941.03 43.822.89 50,016.39 87.62
TOTALS 129.169.42 517,135.69 568,960.72 90.89
TIME (Calendar Days) 204 180 113.33
Final Contractor earnings for this project total $517, 135.69, which is $51,825.03, under the
contract amount of $568,960.72. The primary reasons for the savings are unused temporary
asphalt paving, fencing, off-site channel excavation, and miscellaneous contingency funds
included in this contract.
The following is a breakdown of the savings by category:
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211 . METRO 817/267-3367. FAX 817/354-4389
.
.
.
Page 3,
July 3, 1996
Hightower Drive, Section "A 1 ", Contractor's Estimate No.5 & Final
RW A/ra/Enc1osures/FinaI.377/
xc: Mr. C.A. Sanford, City Manager
Mr. Randy Shiflet, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Larry Cunningham, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Patrick J. Elfrink, Director of Finance
Mr. Mike Curtis, P.E., Capital Projects Coordinator
Mr. Fred Durko, City Inspector
Mr. Terry Tice, Austin Bridge & Road Company
·
·
·
Page 2,
July 3, 1996
Hightower Drive, Section "A 1", Contractor's Estimate No.5 & Final
Paving Savings
Drainage Savings
Water System Savings
Signalization Savings
$ 1,173.23
39,351.00
5,107.30
6.193.50
$ 51,825.03
TOTAL COST SAVINGS
The scheduled completion date was June 1, 1996. The City Inspector has indicated that the
project was substantially complete on May 23, 1996, therefore, no liquidated damages were
incurred on this project. The two year period of maintenance will begin on this date, and
therefore, will terminate on July 3, 1998. The maintenance obligation includes repair of
concrete pavement cracking, and failure of any concrete structures constructed by the
contractor, including repair of storm drain pipe or inlet failures, repair of water line breaks,
and repair of signalization equipment malfunctions.
The contractor submitted a letter, (attached), dated June 20, 1996, regarding possible future
pavement failures which might result from water standing in the underground storm drain
pipe, which does not drain completely due to the outlet structure modification required to
accommodate the existing unimproved off-site drainage channel. Until the off-site channel is
improved, by the current property owner or future developers, as required to properly drain
the Hightower Drive underground storm drain pipe, we would recommend that standing
water in the pipe(s) be pumped out after all rainfall or groundwater inflow occurrences, and
that a written record is maintained in the unlikely event that there are possible future
pavement failure problems in the vicinity of the storm drain pipe system.
After the Contractor has signed an affidavit verifying that all suppliers and subcontractors
have been paid, and in the absence of any negative test reports concerning the condition of
this project, we would recommend that this final partial payment, in the amount of
$129,169.42, be made to Austin Bridge & Road Co., 11143 Goodnight Lane, Dallas, Texas,
75229.
We will be available to assist you with any questions which the Council may have concerning
this project at the next regularly scheduled Meeting on July 22, 1996.
~~w. ~.
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.