Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1996-08-12 Agendas -,/ " . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 12, 1996 - 6:15 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills Community Center in the Municipal Court Room, 6720 Northeast Loop 820. . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Town Hall Committee Update - Cheryl Lyman (5 Minutes) 2. I R 96-85 Decision Packages 1996-97 (5 Minutes) 3. GN 96-90 Early Hire of Crime Control District Positions (Agenda Item No. 10) (5 Minutes) 4. GN 96-94 Setting Date for Public Hearings for 1996-97 City Budget, Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation and Crime Control and Prevention District Budgets. (Agenda Item No. 14) (5 Minutes) 5. GN 96-96 Park Board Recommendation for Park Names - Resolution No. 96-14 (Agenda Item No. 16) (5 minutes) >-. --. 6; PU 96-59 Award of Contract for Professional Auditing Services (Agenda Item No. 18) (5 Minutes) 7. PU 96-60 Ratify Purchase of Tables for Pre-Council Chambers (Agenda Item No. 19) (5 Minutes) .. 8. PU 96-62 Approval of Contract with Reed Municipal Services, Inc. (Agenda Item ~~o. 21) (5 Minutes) . . e Page 2 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. PW 96-39 Right-of-Way Dedication to Tarrant County for North Tarrant Parkway and LB-1 Channel - Resolution No. 96-51 (Agenda Item No. 23) (5 Minutes) 10. PW 96-43 Approval of Proposal for Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Amendment Study (Agenda Item No. 27) (5 Minutes) 11. Other Items 12. *Executive Session (5 Minutes) - The Council may enter into closed executive session to discuss the following: A. Consultation with attorney under Gov. Code §551.071: Anadelia Garza vs. NRH /13 I Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. I I *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. ~T;;D CJi!'1(P / : 57) ¡:un. Time 8¡ fbi~riw, . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA August 12, 1996 For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills Community Center in the Municipal Court Room, 6720 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items marked with an * are on the consent agenda and will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 581-5502 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 5. Presentations by Boards & Commissions a. Teen Court Advisory Board Minutes b. Beautification Commission Minutes . Page 2 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 6. IR 96-81 Special Presentation - Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for Fiscal Year 1995-96 7. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 8. Consent Agenda Item(s) Indicated by Asterisk (9, 10, 14, 17, 19,20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26 & 27) *9. GN 96-89 Interlocal Agreement for Household Hazardous Waste Collection - Resolution No. 96-53 *10. GN 96-90 Early Hire of Crime Control District Positions 11. GN 96-91 Appointment to Town Hall Committee , 12. GN 96-92 Appointment to Park and Recreation Board 13. GN 96-93 Consideration of a Deep Water Well - 7716 Davis Boulevard . e Page 3 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *14. GN 96-94 Setting Date for Public Hearings for 1996-97 City Budget, Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation and Crime Control and Prevention District Budgets. 15. GN 96-95 Record Vote on Proposed Tax Rate and Setting of Public Hearing 16. GN 96-96 Park Board Recommendation for Park Names - Resolution No. 96-14 *17. GN 96-97 Revision of School Zone Hours at Richland High School - Ordinance No. 2136 18. PU 96-59 Award of Contract for Professional Auditing Services *19. PU 96-60 Ratify Purchase of Tables for Pre- Council Chambers *20. PU 96-61 Ratify Purchase of Motorola Radios *21. PU 96-62 Approval of Contract with Reed Municipal Services, Inc. *22. PW 96-38 Contract for Laboratory Services with the Trinity River Authority e e . . e NUMBER *23. PW 96-39 *24. PW 96-40 25. PW 96-41 *26. PW 96-42 *27. PW 96-43 28. 29. Page 4 ITEM ACTION TAKEN Right-of-Way Dedication to Tarrant County for North Tarrant Parkway and LB-1 Channel - Resolution No. 96-51 Set Date for Public Hearing on Land Use Assumptions Plan for Revision of Impact Fees for Water and Wastewater Improvements - Resolution No. 96-52 Award of Bid on Rumfield Road, Phase I Curb & Gutter, Sidewalks and Drainage Improvements Approve City-Developer Agreement Concerning Hightower Drive Paving Participation, Eden Addition, Fourth Filing Approval of Proposal for Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Amendment Study Citizens Presentation Adjournment VI. ,:"'> I ) .. <6/q/q~ IOa* /. ø,fWt- TIme 8¡ wJcK~~ " INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. J.R.96-86 -$- Date: August 12, 1996 Su bject: Response to Recycle Article Some of you may have read or heard about the New York Times Magazine's story, "Recycling is Garbage." Attached is a related opinion-editorial article by TNRCC Chairman Barry McBee, which has been distributed to newspapers across the state. In addition, I have also attached an additional response to the same article. at the national level that was retrieved from the Internet. This material is provided to assist you in responding to citizen's inquiries in reference to our recycling programs. Respectfully Submitted: ....-- Pam Burney Environmental Services Director CITY MANAGER ~ORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 00-~~-~wau ~~.~g w.~ ~w~ _1__ t TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION FOR YOUR INFoRMATION e . RECYCLE THIS NEWSPAPER by 111'1)' R. Mdee - - As the Chairman of the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (1NRCC), I found it ironic that ID article atitled, "R.ecycllq is Garbage," appeared recently in the ~ U~ft.. th.1atnt ia a 'Pm of media NpOrtI ,1.Gf"'ftlIDI the value ofrwyoUq pIOpmDS. The Irony is that the piece appeared the same week Om' 1pDC)' repoI1Id that 20 percent. 132,422 metric tons o1"thc newsprint purchased by Texas DeWIpIpm in 199' wu ncycled-œntent. "Ibis melDS tbat our newsøapers not only vohmtari1y met a Ie¡isJative rec)'clin¡ ¡oaI. they did it two years early. Is it possible that our Texas publishers know sometbiq other folks don't? I think the IDS\WI' i. yea. and 80 do . lot of other Texas business people ancI decision-makers. We Texans recycle voluntarily because it works. because it em save money, IUd because it can even mab mODtI)' for buIiD...... communiti.. ac1 føcUvic:luall. ReC)'cUn¡ is havin¡ a positive impact on the Texas IDd national economies because recyclables are nowrecoanfzed u commodities with value in the marketpla. DOt limply u trash to be buried. For the put two y.... recyclables have been traded .on the Cücqo Bow of Trade - Just like aoybcma, polk belli., pœcioua mctala IIDd otbor ma&edal.. In Texas, more than 400 companies now proœa or manufecture recyclables, employin¡ 20,000 worIœrt. ThiJ year, corru¡Âtéd Services in FOZM)' imrattå $67 milliOD to tripl. the liD ofiw paper miD that \IIeI only recycled paper. Neches Fibers in Beaumont win lOon break pound on their S8S million plant to make pulp out ot recovered office ¡:aper. This would not happen iCthere were not mubtp1lce demlDd. Texas is heavily involved in international trade, part1çullrly with Mexico. Recyclable. arc an important part of that activity. Last year Texans shipped about S 130 million worth of æcycleå paper to manuflCtWin¡ DW'ketIin Mexico, where Tex.. has a dominant 90 percent share of recycled paper importL Processors 11'0 n01 the only companies beneftttina tram recycUn¡. Texas Inmuments saves more than half-a--mi11ion cIoUll"lIIUIUIlly in cUsposal caRs II the result of. recycUns project that reduced its solid wate by 65~, or 161 million poundt. between 1990 and 1996. -MORE- MINCY COMMUNlCATICM · P.O. 80113017 ¡ Aum1H, TaAl787UoØ7 · 5J3/475-Z029 0. ll'l1ùd .. ..,.. ....' UIIftt IIIV.... ~k ~ .' RECYCLE! CIWRMAN BARRY McBEE r... ¡ , Taxa indUltry i. fiDdll'\l DeW uses for materials that were once thrown away. In 1994, the most rœcnt year for which data IfCI available, Tcxu Industrial foailiti.. reoyelec1l.4 WUioD. poUDda of chemica1s. The TNRCC has a pro¡ram. RENEW. the Resource Excb'-.e Network for ElimiDatins Waste. that helps manuticturen cxchan¡e leftover DÍaterials for which tile)' CID find a use. lbis volUDtlly propm hu helped to recycle ev~1 &om ~ylene ¡lycol to fish parts. 655 million pounds of materials.iDee 1918. Cities can benefit from recyclin¡ as well. In Texas we have Clean Cities 2000, a pro¡ram with S8 towus ad cities rlDll". in population from 51 to 1 million. aU of which have made volUDtary rcq'diD& çoJDmitmcDtI. ODe ClCID. Citl. 2000 member, PIIDo, .. a our1slicle Ne)'cliDl popm in wbich moø tbID 50 percent of households voluntlrily pertic1pate. By recyc1lD¡ aDd compostin¡, citizeDa laved the city men thin $400.000 in dbpolll costs. The city tumed aioUDd and made an adcI1doDll $500,000 cIo11ln by .111"1 the materiall the)' recovend tIuouah ncycliisa. R.ecycliq proplD1l can procI1Ø 0111.. saviDp fbr loçallovcmmentB. 'Ibe colt of mlint-1rüDs lIDc1fi11a bas tripled ÎD recent )'till. The town of Crockett. faced with eso-l.ttftl costs, 8tIIted the state'. tint m~datf'\')' recyo11aa pro¡nm. Solid wute disposal volume ~ siDce cIropped by half, IQd costs have ciocreuccL Aa TCØI hero DaY)' Crockett aaid, "FInt be sure you're ri¡bt. thm¡O wad" That's what his ,u..nesaØ ctid. . !At me briD¡ the ec=om1cs of recyc1iftl down to the pmoDllleveL The New Vnrk Tim"" ~ I meatiœed said that ifl broke my ceramic co1fee DNI after usiq It 900 timet. it stüJ \\Ou14 have been cheaper to use foIID cuplad thmw than away. Wen, a C:O.IDUI 1riU coat me five bucks. Nine hundred foam C\1PI cost about $23. Which option is rally cheaper? I have a fill ofreccat ardo1cs kDoc1d!)1 the value olreoyo1iD¡. but I have dDce rec)'cled the ori¡i.Da1 DeWJp8pItL, We have . curbslcJe recyclina propm here in A\2ItiD 1hat lenerata revenue for the city. At a local taxpayer I cou1dD't resist. Now I &¡rei ,100 percent with the concept that we all should be reçonaib1e for our own 1rUh. 1hat's why pay.u-you-Ihrow pro¡rams like the Dncs in ScaUle, and hc:1O in Weimar, Texas. plus os we will have lOon in Austin · make sense to me. Rccyelifta II here to Ita)' "~'M it npøIIftwa marbklriven IOlutkm to our IOlid wiD cha11enp. AI is the cue with ID)' commodity. prices for recyclable. will rill aDd fall with demaad, but they will have ID economic value, Where there i. economic value, there II also ceonomiç opportunity. 1tcqrçUn¡ im't prbaao, but prbaae 18l'CC)'clable. BaIT)' R. Mdhe Ia Chalnnan a/"the Texu NOS: RaG..... ComorvaIIon Commiuion. . - ~1'ft'1. .e. I i e . 1 .oF 1 EJF Ouick Eto Write Join ..0 ? ~~ ~ Å .. ~~ Horne Index Forum EDf [Of Search Help . , "~- '"GfI' '''Y.' - - ~-- '-;j, " ',,>' , ..';' ~." 1 ~~ -~ ~ , ~~- -- - ~.~.~ -............ ........ ~ -- E N V I RON ~y1 E f'J T 1\ L 0 E F E ~'J S t: FUN D July 3, 1996 The New York Times Sunday Magazine Letters to The Editor 229 West 43rd St New York, NY 10036 To the Editor: "Recycling Is Garbage" (June 30) dismisses America's recycling success story using unattributed assertions, selective anecdotes and quotes from consultants funded by the plastics and packaging industry and think tanks who see Big Brother lurking behind every recycling bin. In the process, the article belittles the common-sense instinct of Americans who see the wisdom of conserving resources and not fouling their own nests. Obsessed by the issue of landfill space, the author completely missed the real reason to recycle. Compared to using materials once, then throwing them away and having to replace them, recycling saves energy, dramatically reduces pollution from manufacturing, and avoids the destruction of natural resources that occurs when extracting virgin materials. At the current national rate of about 26%, recycling saves enough energy to supply the needs of 9 million U.S. households. And recycling paper cuts down on air and water pollution while reducing pressure to cut down our remaining forests and convert them into monotonous tree farms. The greatest economic benefit of recycling is also ignored in the article: providing a base of materials for robust, efficient manufacturing industries. So far this decade, U.s. paper manufacturers have voluntarily built more than 4S recycling-based pulp and paper mills and only a handful that use virgin wood. This is not just because recycling plants are better for the environment, but because they are a less expensive way to increase production, taking advantage of the increasing supplies of used paper collected in business and community recycling programs. Cordially, Richard A. Denison Senior Scientist John F. Ruston Economic Analyst EDF Home I Ouick Index I EcoForum I Write EDF I Join EDF I~ EDF Membenhip 1-800-684-3322 <0 1996 Environmental Defense Fund (www.edf.or2) 157 Park Avenue Soutb, New York, NY 10010 08/06/96 16 INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 96-87 -$- Date: August 12, 1996 Subject: Grant for Mobile Collection Unit for Household Hazardous Waste Taking advantage of the second round of funding provided by the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission through the North Central Texas Council of Governments, we have made application for another partnership grant to purchase a Mobile Collection Unit for houseshold hazardous waste. The Mobile. Unit will be for use in Northeast Tarrant County and is supported by the following cities: Hurst, Haltom City, Grapevine, Richland Hills, South lake, Keller, Bedford, Euless, Colleyville and the un-incorporated areas of Tarrant County. With the opening of the Regional Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center in southeast Fort Worth in late 1997, there will be no more one day collection events. The event scheduled for October 26, 1996, will be the last county wide collection effort. In the future each city will be required to make arrangements with the City of Fort Worth who will own and operate the Regional Collection Center which they are building with a grant also received from TNRCC in the first round of funding earlier this year. The Mobile Unit will be needed to provide convenient collection sites in each of the participating cities to continue to provide an easy way for individual citizens to dispose of their household hazardous waste without having to transport it to the Regional Center. Each city will share in the use of the unit, which will be a specially built and outfitted trailer that can be set up at a designated site in each city to provide "mini" collection events. The grant request in the amount of $22,450, will be used to purchase a specially designed trailer which will be housed at the Regional Collection Center. North Richland Hills will have no responsibility for maintaining the trailer, as that will be included in the cost of using the Unit each time. Each city that uses the Mobile Unit will be responsible for paying for disposal cost of actual waste collected that cannot be recycled, and the cost of replacing supplies used during the event as well as a user fee for the Regional Center. The total cost of use of the Mobile Unit is anticipated to be considerably less than the cost to participate in one-day county wide collection events. Respectfully Submitted: Pam Burney Environmental Services Director CITY MANAGER ~ORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS To: The office of Mayor, CUy CouncU & CUy Manager e>m: Town lIall Committee l11e Town Ilall Committee met. 1H.'tt. wt~ek and has out.llnt~d t.he tbllowlng proposal. flt-..ase let. us know If you have any qut"A'ttlons. I . Uenentl st~ml·annual town hall meeting To be held Thursday, Oct. 17. First part of Ute IneeUng would be Infonnatlonal wlUt reports on t.he I~YA wat.t~r st.atus, tht~ water agrt~t~ment wlt.h Watauga, and updat.e on road con~1.ru(:. tJon within t.he clt.y. The second half" of t.he mt~etlng would be open t.o gent~""'dl dls(:usslon of topics from Ute clUzens. 2. Town Hall would like to encourage fonnatlon of homeowner's groups. We wUl contact t-..H<:h group and ask If a t.own hall membt~r could attend their next meeting to see what Is. sues are of concern In their area. "Ibis would be Intonnatlonal only and a master report would be (:ompllt-..d and pw..sented t.o the coundl. 3. flold periodic meetings thr repwA'ttmt.atlvt-A't of t~ach homeowner's groups to attend. "lbt"A'te meeUngs would be Infonnatlonal. A selected topic would be picked and Ute appropriate pelSOn would speak on Ute suq,ect. The IneetlngB would be held In different parts of Ute clly. 1'01' example, a meeting to be held at the tsu~ey Kd. Senior Cent.er might have parks and rec present a plan on Ute hike and bike trails In Ute norlliem part of Ute cUy. A meeUng at Dan I~:hols might he on n>ad construction In t.hat aw..H. 'Ibis would also be a g(xxl time t.o ad. J&ess Issues from our fact finding mission delalled In sectlon 2. as well as talklng to home- ~er groups about helping wlUt Ute Crepe Myrtle and history prq'ecl. -t. The Star Telegram has contacted us and would llke to do anoUter series of town hall mee(:... Ings su(:h as the past. one on gangs. It would be of anot.her topl(:, though. 'Ibe t1~t. mt-A-l.lng would be sometlme Ut1s fall. 5. Only a small port.lon of our dt.l7.ens unde~tand how our dty government. ope.....dtt-A't. On the national, state and 1000.Bllevel only a small portion vote or are registered to vote. We would Uhe to look at taking on a prQ'ect to encourage I'iRH to regtster, vote, and become Infonned Involvt-..d dtl~..ens. A hnx:hure could be (:ompllt-..d and a sed-Jon In the newsletter detailing how our dty fum:tlons. frlort.o the November elt"A:tlons, a (:.ampalgn to urge dtl~.ens to regL't- ter to vole by having reglstraUon cards available and a box to drop Utem In at several city JO(:Htlons. If this meets with your appn>val, a more dt"..tHlI pn>posal (:.an be developed by our committee. We are I<x>klng at. ways In which be can be of" uset'ul service t.o you as well H.'t the (:ltI~.ens of rmH. I would be happy to answer any questlons you may have. Aeryt Cowen Lyman '~rson. Town Hall Committee e e e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT ROOM, 6720 NORTHEAST lOOP 820 - JULY 22, 1996 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order July 22, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Mack Garvin Lyle E. Welch Mark Wood JoAnn Johnson Don Phifer Byron Sibbet Linda Spurlock Sansoucie Staff: C.A. Sanford Randy Shiflet Larry Cunningham Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Greg Dickens Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer 2. I NVOCA TION Councilwoman Johnson gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JULY 8,1996 APPROVED Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the minutes of the July 8, 1996 meeting. e e e City Council Minutes July 22, 1996 Page 2 Motion carried 7-0. 5. PRESENTA TIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES No action necessary. 6. PRESENTATION OF "YARD OF THE MONTH" AWARDS Mayor Brown and Deloris Pultz, Beautification Commission Chairman, presented the "Yard of the Month" awards for July to: Ms. Neta Mason, 3524 Bewley Drive; James and Linda Hopkins, 4605 DeVille; Dale and Sarah Henry, 4913 Skylark Circle; Marshall and Betty Siemer, 5700 Caracas; Mark and Rita Hatfield, 8237 O'Brian Way; Johnny and Karen Hooks, 7117 Winchester; Ron and Paige Ford, 9112 High Oaks; Charlie and Leslie Kilgore, 6708 North Park; and Kenneth and Rosalie Shaffer, 8037 Kristina. 7. PRESENTATION OF "LANDSCAPE OF THE MONTH" AWARD The "Landscape of the Month" award for July went to the Woodland Oaks Homeowner's Association, 6717 Rolling Hills Drive. 8. PRESENTATION OF "KEEP TEXAS BEAUTIFUL" AWARD Ms. Deloris Pultz, Beautification Commission Chairman, presented the "1996 KTB Community Award" to Mayor Brown. Ms. Deloris Pultz also presented the "1996 KTB Education Leadership Award" to Sandy Dailey. 9. IR 96-81 - SPECIAL PRESENTATION - DISTINGUISHED BUDGET PRESENTATION AWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 Mayor Brown advised this presentation would be made at a later date. e e e City Council Minutes July 22, 1996 Page 3 10. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA None. 11. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (16, 18, 19, 20, 21 AND 22) APPROVED Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. 12. PZ 96-16 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF VERNON SMITH TO REZONE A PORTION OF LOT 2R, BLOCK 2, CULP ADDITION, FROM 1-2 MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. (GENERALLY LOCATED ON TRADONNA LANE) _ ORDINANCE NO. 2134 APPROVED Attorney McEntire explained what was to be considered by the Council during the public hearing. He explained the public hearing was to consider the rezoning of the property and that it was not a platting issue. Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak for or against the request to come forward. Mr. Vernon Smith, applicant, appeared before the Council and explained what was being proposed for the property. The following appeared and expressed concerns about the developer working with them to save the trees. Ms. Lou Baker, 8336 Odell Ms. Julie Starr, 7601 Hewitt Ms. Terri Mace, 7605 Aubrey Lane e e e City Council Minutes July 22, 1996 Page 4 Ms. Myrtis Byrd, 7312 Hialeah Circle West Ms. MaryAnn Mayers, North Richland Hills resident. Ms. Phyllis Honeysett, 8353 Odell, appeared before the Council and spoke in favor of the houses. She requested that the developer consider a 1,400 square foot minimum. Mr. Bob Bess, 7600 Ridgeway, expressed appreciation to the Council for listening to the Baker's concerns. Mr. Jim Mace, 7605 Aubrey lane, asked if a deed restriction was possible concerning the trees. Attorney McEntire explained how deed restrictions work and the purpose of deed restrictions. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve Ordinance No. 2134 with a minimum house size of 1,300 square feet and the average of all houses a minimum of 1,500 square feet, as approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried 7-0 13. PS 96-18 - RECONSIDERATION OF THE REQUEST OF MARK AND HSIANG-LAN WOOD FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, WOOD ADDITION (LOCATED IN THE 7900 BLOCK OF SMITHFIELD ROAD) DENIEQ Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to deny the reconsideration of PS 96-18. Motion carried 7-0. e e e City Council Minutes July 22, 1996 Page 5 14. PS 96-24 - REMOVAL OF PLATTING REQUIREMENT _ FOR LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, ANTINONE ADDITION APPROVED Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Garvin, to approve PS 96-24 removing the sidewalk requirement on Dick Fisher Drive from the plat. Motion carried 7-0. 15. PS 96-28 - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REVISIONS TO THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN REGARDING RUMFIELD ROAD BETWEEN DAVIS BOULEVARD AND SPRING OAK DRIVE _ ORDINANCE NO. 2135 APPROVED Staff explained the proposed revision to the Thoroughfare Plan. Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. Mr. Dale Curry, 8613 Rumfield, appeared before the Council. Mr. Curry stated he would like for the road to be two lanes instead of four lanes. Dr. O.G. Tobias, 8800 Rumfield, appeared before the Council. Mr. Tobias questioned the need for Rumfield Road to be widened and who would benefit from its widening. Mr. Ken Brower, resident of North Richland Hills, was opposed to trees being removed to accommodate the road. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Garvin, to approve Ordinance No. 2135. Motion carried 7-0. City Council Minutes July 22, 1996 Page 6 e *16. GN 96-85 - LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT RESOLUTION NO. 96-47 APPROVED 17. GN 96-86 - NOMINATION TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE TARRANT APPRAISAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION NO. 96-49 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve Resolution No. 96-49 nominating Mr. Michael A. Davis to the Tarrant Appraisal Board. Motion carried 7-0. e *18. GN 96-87 - AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE TO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ON AUTO THEFT TASK FORCE RESOLUTION NO. 96-50 APPROVEQ *19. PU 96-57 - APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT -QF-WA Y FOR RUM FIELD ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I APPROVED *20. PU 96-58 - AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE FUEL ON "SPOT MARKET BASIS" APPROVED *21. PW 96-36 - APPROVE AMENDED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CONCERNING NORTH TARRANT PARKWAY (WILSON LANE) RIGHT -QF-WA Y DEDICATION AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AND CITY OF KELLER RESOLUTION NO. 96-48 e APPROVED e e City Council Minutes July 22, 1996 Page 7 21a. PW 96-37 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR RUMFIELD ROAD, PHASE I APPROVED Councilwoman Sansoucie moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve PW 96-37. Motion carried 7-0. *22. PAY 96-06 - APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.5 IN THE AMOUNT OF $128,002.55 TO AUSTIN BRIDGE & ROAD CO. INC., FOR HIGHTOWER DRIVE, SECTION "Ai" PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED 23. CITIZENS PRESENTATION Ms. Myrtis Byrd, 7312 Hialeah Circle, appeared before the Council. Ms. Byrd requested an update on the extension of Rumfield Road to Precinct Line Road. 24. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting. Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: e Patricia Hutson - City Secretary · Jeen Court Minutes: Adviso~oard MfHJ1iDg Jj¡Jy 24 1996 Present: Tami Spraggins, Ron Moore, Kathy Graves, Lynne Simpson Absent: Wayne Moody, Bill Moore, Katie Watson e I. Call to order at 6:30 p.m. II. Introduction of Kathy Graves, our newest Teen Court Advisory Board member. III. Discussion of Teen Court's upcoming 1ield trip" to see a "real" trial, which is scheduled for August 5, 1996 at 9 a.m. The trial will be held in Criminal District Court Number One, which is located on the 5th floor of the Tarrant County Justice Center, 401 W. Belknap. Judge Sharon Wilson will be presiding. Quite a few volunteers have expressed interest in attending. IV. Discussion of the Teen Court retreat Although the retreat had a low tum-out, one very good thing did come of it; Nick Datoo, Defense Head Attorney, was offered the chance to sit at counsel tables with Glynis at a trtal beginning on July 23! Additionally, because of the retreat's small numbers, ways to recruit additional volunteers were discussed. Kristina discussed with Nick the fact that (1) no one listens to the announcements at RHS (our primary recruitment method) and (2) that there is an elective Criminal Justice class he will be taking next semester that is full of people who would love to volunteer! Nick will be Teen Court's recruitment spokesperson in. the class when school begins on August 20. Kristina may also go speak to the class about volunteering and will talk to the teacher about possible extra credit - V. Discussion about scheduling board members for specific Teen Court docket nights. Advisory Board members agreed that this would be a good idea. Lynne and Kathy both chose the 3rd Monday court. Tami chose the 1 st Monday court and Ron is flexible. All Advisory Board e members absent on July 22, please call (581-5728) to let Kristina know your preference! · e e VI. Open discussion. A. Kristina brought up a question that Bill had introduced to her at the July 15 Teen Court session. "Should we add Teen Court Bailiff duty as part of sentences?" The Board decided that instead of putting Teen Court on the placement list for anyone to choose, we would all keep our eyes open for specific defendants who would be well-suited to become Teen Court volunteers and will offer Teen Court as a service placement only to these select few. These teens will still have three months to complete their hours and any hours that can't be earned before the three month deadline will have to be served elsewhere B. After mention of the sloppy dress in Teen Court lately, the Board decided to penalize defendants who are unsuitably dressed by assessing 5 additional community service hours. Jurors who are unsuitably dressed will be penalized an additional 2 hours. C. The Advisory Board decided that our meetings should begin at 6:00 p.m. rather than 6:30. D. Kristina expressed some concern about whether Teen Court defendants are benefitting all they can from Teen Court Kristina will begin looking into creating programs and groups (I.e. assertiveness training, parenting classes, drug/alcohol education, etc.) within Teen Court for those who do not have the money or the inclination to go elsewhere for help. VII. Adjournment at 8:30. · · · MINUTES OF THE BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE PRE-COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 MAY 21,1996 ATTENDANCE Present: Deloris Pultz Emily Ward Jeanne Lueck Billie Sommermeyer Jane Dunkelberg Phyllis Creecy Glenn Nerwin Chairperson Vice Chairperson Commission Member Commission Member Commission Member Commission Member Alternate Commission Member STAFF Tim Hightshoe Sandra Miller Parks Superintendent Secretary Absent: Patsy Tucker Commission Member 1. CALL TO ORDER Ms. Pultz called the meeting to order May 21, 1996 at 7:03 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Mrs. Lueck made a motion, seconded by Ms. Dunkelberg to approve the minutes of the January 16,1996 Beautification Commission meeting. Motion carried 7-0. 3. KTB CONVENTION DISCUSSION Ms. Pultz reminded Commission members that the convention was being held July 10-12, 1996. She suggested that one room be reserved during the convention for emergency purposes. Mrs. Sommermeyer made the motion and was seconded by Ms. Ward that one room be reserved during the convention. Motion carried 7-0. Hotel reservations and convention registration will be made by Sandra Miller, Secretary. Ms. Dunkelberg made a motion that was seconded by Ms. Ward to buy lunch for Sandy Dailey from North Richland Middle School, winner of the Sadie Graff Award. Motion carried 7 - O. . INFORMAL REPORTTO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 96-81 Å Date: t-·V'-..\. Subject: August 12, 1996 Special Presentation - Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for Fiscal Year 1995-96. The City of North Richland Hills received the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for its Comprehensive Annual Budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1995. The Budget Award is a prestigious national award presented by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation of exemplary budget documents. The Distinguished Budget Presentation Award is valid for a period of one year only. The City has received a Distinguished Budget Presentation award for the last six consecutive years. In 1982, the Government Finance Officers Association's Committee on Government Budgeting and Management began a series of studies regarding "good budgetary practices." One result of this study was a conclusion that the association should formally encourage exemplary budgeting practices. The GFOA Executive Board approved the introduction of an Awards Program for Distinguished Budget Presentation that would recognize exemplary efforts by governments and nonprofit organizations. . Governments participating in the program submit copies of their approved budget documents for review by an impartial panel of budget experts. Each budget document is evaluated using a comprehensive checklist with four major categories. These major functions include the document as a policy tool, an operations guide, a financial plan and a communications medium. The focus of the Budget Review program is on the management elements of the budget document and its effectiveness in a policy and public environment. Its emphasis on Performance Measures bring accountability to government through documentation and further assist City Council and Management through long range policy planning for the City's future. It is generally foúnd that jurisdictions whose budget documents are properly prepared tend to avoid many of the common weaknesses in governmental financial management. The program encourages participants to address the needs of elected officials, the public and interested parties in the financial policies of the City, and encourages guidance in operations improvements. It helps avoid the tendency of budgets to become static, directionless financial documents. A good budget document also provides an excellent opportunity to communicate with the public, the financial community and the press. It reinforces the needs of nontechnicians to obtain a general understanding of governmental finance through the budget document. An officer of the Texas GFOA will be at the Council meeting to present the Distinguished Budget Award to the City. No action is needed by Council, but we do commend Debbie Durko, Budget Coordinator, and the Budget staff for their professional efforts in the City's receiving this prestigious award. . Patrick J. Elfrink Director of Finance ISSUED BYTHE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS . ;z; 0 I ] ] .~ § E= ....!:2 co .... ~.s ::S.S go < ~ co~.... C "'5'~ i ~ ~ i! .!:2 <:) J! r~.() :; < ~~~~~ ~ ~ r~ 1 ! ~ ~ ~~"'C ~~ ....'I/~COCO .~ .fij .s ], E-c §~ i:!~ '1/ ~ ._ ~ ~ a U} 'a~~ .. ~ ~ .. Q" \! ~ ~ ItS ]...]CO ~ ~ l 0"\ s:: § >< Q" ~ l·CO.() 0"\ .~ Q) M E-i ~~~:¡:~ ~ i'-] J! ~ , = , '1/ ... ~ 'O:t' . ..-4 U} ~ ] .¡.!:2 .. C,) H M 0 ~ 0 r-i ~ ... .~"5 .~ r-i 0,;:; <:) -'- t ..c:: . CIJ 0 o.w -,.. Ii:: ....~ < CIJ .Coo:! ~~ ::r: .9 Ii::~ ~ I u < -š ~ .~.9 t::I~' H H·", 't:I co.§ r a .... ItS ~ ~ ;Z; B'E ¡:: 8~' ~ '1/ ~ Ii:: ItS ~~.~"'C ~ ~ 0 . ..c::0 r-i <Cco Š~ ~ ~ ItS 0 ..c:: ~.. ~'ij ~ Þ-4 HCJ U ~~'~i!~ Is o § ~ E-c O.w .,.. \oJ§: '1/ ë:3 " Z ..QQ) ~ ~c i:! ~ ~ . !:a ( )U ~,g t¡'I/~Q,,~-{j ~ ..c:: u~....~i!i ~ §ª ~ .w '- ~ H .1!. ~i~ J 0 III 0 ¡...; t¡, co~ .... ~ z ~';;; æ CIJ u ~ ~ 4- ~B 0 55 ~ ;::... f~ ~ .w -,.. 0 CJ ~ ' . ð~ ' "IJ ~ . L {\! III CJ ( ) , . ~~ U s: .1 ' . , . í E= I ., I, ' . ( ~ , ~ ' ' , U I '.' I ¡,- i'I.\ ,I , 1"\ i \ .,,\\ I \1·,1 . Ii --- --- --- --- --- --- --- GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 180 North Michigan Avenue. Suite 800. Chicago. Illinois 60601 312/977-9700. Fax: 312/977-4806 April 8, 1996 Mr. C.A. Sanford City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182 Dear Mr. Sanford: I am pleased to notify you that the City of North Richland Hills, Texas has received the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the current year, from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). This award is the highest fonn of recognition in governmental budgeting and represents a significant achievement by your organization. . When a Distinguished Budget Presentation award is granted to an entity, a Certificate of Recognition for Budget Presentation is also presented to the individual or department designated as being primarily responsible for its having achieved the award. This has been presented to: Deborah Durko, Budget Coordinator We hope you will arrange for a fonnal public presentation of the award, and that appropriate publicity will be given to this notable achievement. A press release is enclosed for your use. We appreciate your participation in GFOA's Budget Awards Program. Through your example, we hope that other entities will be encouraged to achieve excellence in budgeting. Sincerely, ~/~ Jeffrey L. Esser Executive Director JLE/ af . Enclosure WASHINGTON OFFICE 1750 K Street. NW.. Suite 650, Washington. OC 20006 202/429-2750 . Fax: 202/429-2755 · Ii --- --- --- --- --- --- --- April 8, 1996 GOVERNMENTRNANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 180 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 800, Chicago. Illinois 60601 312/977-9700. Fax: 312/977-4806 PRESS RELEASE For Further Information Contact RELEASE IMMEDIATELY Stephen J. Gauthier (312) 977-9700 ****************************************************************************** Chicago--The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) is pleased to announce that the City of North Richland Hills, Texas has received the GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for its budget. The award represents a significant achievement by the entity. It reflects the commitment of the governing body and staff to meeting the highest principles of governmental budgeting. In order to receive the budget award, the entity had to satisfy nationally recognized guidelines for effective budget presentation. These guidelines are designed to assess how well an entity's budget serves as: · a policy document · · a financial plan · an operations guide · a communication device Budget documents must be rated "proficient" in all four categories to receive the award. When a Distinguished Budget Presentation award is granted to an entity, a Certificate of Recognition for Budget Presentation is also presented to the individual or department designated as being primarily responsible for its having achieved the award. This has been presented to: Deborah Durko, Budget Coordinator. Since the inception of the GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Awards Program in 1984, approximately 700 entities have received the Award. Award recipients have pioneered efforts to improve the quality of budgeting and provide an excellent example for other governments throughout North America. The Government Finance Officers Association is a nonprofit professional association serving 12,650 government finance professionals throughout North America. The GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Awards Program is the only national awards program in governmental budgeting. · WASHINGTON OFFICE 1750 K Street, N.W.. Suite 650, Washington, DC 20006 202/429-2750 . Fax: 202/429-2755 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , Department: Environmental Services Council Meeting Date: 08/12/96 . Inter-local Agreement for iect: Household Hazardous Waste Collection - Resolution No. 96-53 Agenda Number: GN 96-89 This year Tarrant County has applied the grant for sponsoring the third regional household hazardous waste collection event which is scheduled for October 26, 1996. The following three sites have been designated as: (1) Fort Worth: Unspecified (2) Northeast Tarrant: TCJC Northeast Campus (3) Fort Worth: Loop 820 & Hwy. 287 in Southwest Fort Worth Even though Tarrant County applied for the grant from TNRCC, the City of Fort Worth will be responsible for administration of the event and contracting with the disposal contractor as they did last year. This year,nineteen cities have expressed interest in participating in the event. The grant is for up to $100,000 in project funding to pay for non-disposal costs of the event and includes such expenses as site setup, collection administration, transportation costs, advertising, and public education materials. Entities will contract with Fort Worth to participate in the event. The contract specifies a "not to exceed" cost based on an estimated household participation rate and an estimated cost per household of $75. Using the estimated participation figure of 299 households, the cost to North Richland Hills is $22,435 which is close to the original projected cost of participation in 1995. Cities will pay lesser amounts, if applicable, as was the case last year for North Richland Hills when our actual cost was $6,205.78 when one hundred and seventy-three North Richland Hills households participated in the 1995 program. Each participating city is required to approve the attached inter-local agreement which includes a mutual indemnification and also establishes each participating city's maximum share of the event's non-grant funded ."~ts. The notice of intent to participate is needed by Sectember 1. 1996 to enable production of advertising erials. The City's Environmental Services Department and Emergency Manager receive telephone calls daily from residents requesting information on disposal of household hazardous waste. Resolution H:§I will establish a safe and inexpensive method for disposing of pesticides, solvents, paints or other chemicals used in the household. This second collection event will give all residents of North Richland Hills the opportunity to safely dispose of any household hazardous waste free of charge. Volunteers that worked last year have once again expressed a desire to help during the event. There is funding in the 1996/1997 Budget to cover the cost of a public awareness campaign to ensure maximum participation. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 96-53 and authorize city staff to enter into the required inter-local agreement for participation in its third regional Household Hazardous Waste Collection Event. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Av~il~hlp. Finance Director . CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , tþ . STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF TARRANT INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this .12...-day of August, 1996, by and between the City of Fort Worth, Texas, a home-rule municipal corporation situated in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called "Fort Worth," acting herein by and through Charles Boswell, its duly authorized Assistant City Manager, and the City of North Richland Hills. a home-rule municipality situated in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called "Participating City," acting herein by and through Randal Shiflet, its duly authorized Assistant City Manager. WITNESETH: WHEREAS, Texas Govemment Code, Chapter 791, authorizes the formulation of interlocal cooperation agreements between and among municipalities; and WHEREAS, Texas Govemment Code, §791.011 provides that a local govemment may contract with another to perform govemmental functions and services, and §791.003(3)(H) defines waste disposal as a govemmental function and service; and WHEREAS, Texas Govemment Code, §791.025 provides that a local govemment may agree with another local govemment to purchase services; and WHEREAS, Fort Worth and Participating City desire to enter into an interlocal agreement whereby Fort Worth will purchase the services of a disposal firm and administer a household hazardous waste collection event; and WHEREAS, Fort Worth and, Participating City mutually desire to be subject to the provisions of Texas Govemment Code, Chapter 791, also known as the Interlocal Cooperation Act; NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: 1996 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION 1 1. DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this contract, the following definitions shall apply: Environmental damages shall mean all claims, judgments, damages, losses, penalties, fines, liabilities (including strict liability), encumbrances, liens, costs, and expenses of investigation and defense of any claim, whether or not such claim is ultimately defeated, and of any good faith settlement of judgment, of whatever kind or nature, contingent or otherwise, matured or unmatured, foreseeable or unforeseeable, including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and disbursements and consultanfs fees, any of which are incurred subsequent to the execution of this agreement as a result of the the handling, collection, transportation, storage, disposal, treatment, recovery, and/or reuse of waste pursuant to this agreement, or the existence of a violation of environmental requirements pertaining to same, and including without limitation: (a) Damages for personal injury and death, or injury to property or natural resources; (b) Fees incurred for the services of attorneys, consultants, contractors, experts, laboratories and all other costs incurred in connection with the investigation or remediation of such wastes or violation of environmental requirementc: including, but not limited to, the preparation of any feasibility studies or repol or the performance of any cleanup, remediation, removal, responsb, abatement, containment, closure, restoration or monitoring work required by any federal, state or local governmental agency or political subdivision, or otherwise expended in connection with the existence of such wastes or violations of environmental requirements, and including without limitation any attorney's. fees, costs and expenses incurred in enforcing this contract or collecting any sums due hereunder; and (c) Uability to any third person or govemmental agency to indemnify such person or agency for costs expended in connection with the items referenced in subparagraph (b) herein. Environmental requirements shall mean all applicable present and future statutes, regulations, rules, ordinances, codes, licenses, permits, orders, approvals, plans, authorizations, concessions, franchises, and similar items, of all governmental agencies, departments, commissions, boards, bureaus, or instrumentalities of the United States, states, and political subdivisions thereof and all applicable judicial, administrative, and regulatory 1996 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION 2 , - . decrees, judgments, and orders relating to the protection of human health or the environment, including without limitation: (a) All requirements, including but not limited to those pertaining to reporting, licensing, permitting, investigation, and remediation of emissions, discharges, releases, or threatened releases of hazardous materials, pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous or toxic substances, materials, or wastes whether solid, liquid, or gaseous in nature, into Jh.e air, surfacewater, groundwater, stormwater, or land, or relating to the manufacture, processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage, disposal, transport, or handling of pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous or toxic substances, materials, or wastes, whether solid, liquid, or gaseous in nature; and (b) All requirements pertaining to the protection of the health and safety of employees or the public. Force majeure shall include decrees of or restraints by a governmental instrumentality, acts of God, work stoppages due to labor disputes or strikes, failure of Fort Worth's contractor(s) to perform pursuant to their agreements with Fort Worth for the conduct of the collection event, fires, explosions, epidemics, riots, war, rebellion, and sabotage. Fort Worth collection center shall mean the location(s) to be used within the city limits of Fort Worth. Household hazardous waste shall mean any solid waste generated in a household by a consumer which, except for the exclusion provided for in 40 Code of Federal Regulations §261.4(b)(1), would be classified as a hazardous waste under 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 261. Participating cities, when used in the plural, shall mean the City of Fort Worth, Participating City, and all other cities which have entered into interlocal agreements with the City of Fort Worth for the household hazardous waste collection event. Person shall mean an individual, corporation, organization, government, or governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, partnership, association, or any other legal entity. 1.996 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION 3 Satellite collection centers shall mean those location(s) used for collection which are located outside the city limits of Fort Worth. Waste shall have the same meaning as "solid waste" as that term is defined in Texas Health and Safety Code §361.003, and including hazardous substances. 2. PURPOSE The purpose of this Interlocal Agreement (hereafter "Contract'1 is to enter into an agreement between Fort Worth and and Participating City, whereby, subject to the terms and conditions specified below, Fort Worth agrees to purchase the services of a household hazardous waste disposal firm and administer and supervise a regional household hazardous waste collection event, which will be available to households within Participating City. 3. DUTIES OF PARTICIPATING CITY Participating City agrees to perform the following duties in connection with the household hazardous waste collection event A. Designate one of its employees to serve on the household hazardous waste collection event planning committee; B. Recruit its citizens to volunteer as workers at the event. c. Coordinate and fund all event advertising targeted to its own citizens, as it deems necessary. 4. ADDITIONAL DUTIES OF A PARTICIPATING CITY IN WHICH A SATELLITE COLLECTION CENTER IS LOCATED If Fort Worth and Participating City agree separately that a satellite collection center will be located in Participating City, Participating City agrees to perform the following services in connection with the household hazardous waste collection event: A. Designate one of its employees to coordinate the event at the satellite collection center with Fort Worth; 1996 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION 4 t - . B. Provide solid waste disposal for boxes, empty containers and other materials brought to the satellite collection center during the event which can be disposed of in a municipal landfill. C. Provide traffic control, including barricades, cones and police officers as necessary at the satellite collection center and adjacent public streets during the event. D. Provide sufficient volunteers to handle traffic control, participant surveys, and handling of recyclable materials at the satellite collection center during the event. 5. SERVICES OF FORT WORTH Fort Worth agrees to perform the following services in connection with the household hazardous waste collection event: A. Administer and supervise a regional household hazardous waste collection event on Saturday, October 26, 1996, at the Fort Worth collection center, and at the satellite collection center. B. Chair a planning committee comprised of cities in the region which are participating in the event. C. Provide a centrally located collection site within Fort Worth for the event. D. Employ personnel, perform administrative activities, and provide administrative services néœssary to perform this Contract. E. Cause the event to be advertised in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. F. Enter into a contract with a household hazardous waste disposal firm for the handling, collection, transportation, storage, disposal, treatment, recovery, and/or reuse of household hazardous waste collected at the event. Such firm shall be required pursuant to the contract to assume generator status for the waste collected at the event, excluding materials recycled pursuant to subsection G below, to choose a disposal site for the waste subject to Fort Worth's approval, and to indemnify Fort Worth and all participating cities. 1.996 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION 5 G. AITangefor recycling vendors for used oil, batteries and anti-freeze at no cost to participating cities. 6. RIGHT OF REFUSAL OF WASTE Fort Worth and its contractor shall have the right to refuse to accept waste at the event from a resident of any of the participating cities and to eject such individual from the premises of the event if in the reasonable judgment of Fort Worth or its contractor: A. The waste is not household hazardous waste; B. The waste fails to meet other criteria established for the event; C. The individual does not have sufficient identification to establish that he/she is in fad a resident of any of the participating cities;. or D. The waste or the individual presents a hazard to the event or to persons or property at the event. 7. COMPENSATION A. Participating City agrees to pay Fort Worth the sum of $22435.00 ( twenty-~ thousand four hundred thirty-five dollars and I1Q cents) as compensation for its share of the non-grant funded costs for the event, which is an amount that fairly compensates Fort Worth for its services under this Contrad. This sum shall be paid to Fort Worth no later than ten (10) days following receipt by Participating City of a final cost accounting for the event from Fort Worth, and shall be paid from funds currently available to Participating City. . B. The above sum is based upon an estimated 299 households from Participating City taking part in the event. If after the conclusion of the event there are committed funds as set out above from participating Tarrant County cities left unexpended by Fort Worth on the event, the sum agreed to be paid above shall be reduced on a pro rata basis provided the adual cost for the number of households from Participating City that took part in the event did not exceed the .sum agreed to be paid above. C. The cost accounting provided by Fort Worth shall include figures for the total number of households participating in the event, the number of Participating 1996 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION 6 , - . City's households participating in the event, and the total waste collected at the event. 8. INDEMNIFICATION A. Participating City does hereby release, indemnify, reimburse, defend, and hold hannless the participating cities, their offiçel'$, agents, employees, and volunteers, from and against any and all liability, claims, suits, demands, or causes of action which may arise due to any loss or damage to personal property, or personal injury, and/or death occurring as a consequence of the perfonnance of this Contract, when such injuries, death, or damages are caused by the sole negligence of Participating City, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers, or the joint negligence of Participating City, its officers, agents, employees, or volunteers, and any other person or entity with the exception of the indemnified city. ' , 8. Environmental Indemnification 1. To the extent of its allocated liability as set forth in paragraph (8)(3) below, each of the participating cities does hereby release, indemnify, defend, reimburse, and hold hannless the participating cities, their officers, agents, employees and volunteers, against any and all environmental damages resulting from the handling, collection, transportation, storage, disposal, treatment, recovery, and/or reuse, by any person, of waste which was collected pursuant to this Contract. 2. To the extent of its allocated liability as set forth in paragraph (8)(3) belów, each of the participating cities does hereby release, indemnify, defend, reimburse, and hold hannless the participating cities, their officers, agents, employees and volunteers, against any and all violations by any person of any environmental requirements pertaining to the handling, collection, transportation, storage, disposal, treatment, recovery, and/or reuse of waste collected pursuant to this Contract. 3. Fort Worth and Participating City recognize that a "cradle-to-grave" responsibility exists for waste collected at the event. Fort Worth and Participating City recognize that it will not be possible to identify one city's waste from another's once the waste has been aggregated. Fort Worth and Participating City further recognize that it is necessary to create an equitable allocation of liability among the participating cities for the waste collected at the event. Therefore, Fort Worth and 1996 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FÕR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION 7 Participating City agree that the allocated liability of each of the participating cities under this paragraph (B) shall be calculated as follows: the actual number of a city's households contributing waste to the event divided by the actual number of total households contributing waste to the event = X percent X percent = the percentage of the total volume of waste collected at the event for which such city shall be liable. C. The obligations of the participating cities under this Section shall include, but not be limited to, the burden and expense of defending all claims, suits and administrative proceedings (with counsel reasonably approved by the indemnified parties), even if such claims, suits or proceedings are groundless, false, or fraudulent, and conducting all negotiations of any description, and paying and discharging, when and as the same become due, any and all judgments, penalties or other sums due against such indemnified persons. D. The obligations of the participating cities under this Section shall survive the expiration of this Contract and the discharge of all other obligations owed by the parties to each other hereunder. E. The participating cities agree that their City Council resolutions (or whatever mechanism is used) that approve this Contract will contain substantially the following language: North Richland Hills does hereby agree to release, indemnify, defend, reimburse, and hold .harmless the participating cities, their officers, agents, employees and volunteers, as set forth in the attached Interlocal Agreement for Household Hazardous Waste Collection. During each year while there is any liability by reason of said contract, including the calendar year 1996, the City Council of said City shall compute and ascertain the rate and amount of ad valorem tax, based on the latest approved tax rolls of said City, with full allowances being made for tax delinquencies and costs of tax collection, which will be sufficient to raise and produce the money required to pay any sums which may be or become due during any such year, in no instance to be less than two percent (2%) of such obligation, together with all interest thereon, because of the obligation assumed. Said rate and amount of ad valorem tax is hereby ordered to be levied and is hereby levied against all taxable property in said City for each year while any liability exists by reason of the obligation undertaken by the contract, and said ad valorem tax shall 1996 INTERLOCAL. AGREEMENT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION 8 , - . be assessed and collected each year until all of the obligations herein incurred shall have been discharged and all liability hereunder discharged. Participating City shall submit to Fort Worth a certified copy of the resolution containing the above language, no later than ten business days prior to the day of the event. If Participating City or fails to make this submission as required, it shall not be permitted to participate in the event. 9. IMMUNITY It is expressly understood and agreed that, in the execution of this Contract, none of the participating cities waives, nor shall be hereby deemed to waive, any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising in the exercise of governmental powers and functions, and that the services described in this agreement are a governmental function. 10. FORCE MAJEURE A delay or failure of Fort Worth or of a Participating City with a satellite collection center to perform services pursuant to this Contract shall be excused to the extent that the delay or failure to perform resulted from a force majeure event, and the delay or failure was beyond the control of Fort Worth or said Participating City and not due to its fault or negligence. Participating City and Fort Worth shall not have, and hereby waive, any claim whatever for any damages resulting from delays or failure to perform caused by a force majeure event. 11. TERMINATION Fort Worth and Participating City shall each have the right to terminate this Contract upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the other parties. 12. NOTICE Any notices required to be given under this Contract shall be delivered as follows: If to Fort Worth: Brian Boerner, CHMM Senior Environmental Compliance Specialist 1996 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION 9 Department of Environmental Management 1000 Throckmorton Fort Worth, Texas 76102 If to Participating City: Pam Bumey, R.S. Environmental Services Director City of North Richland Hills 7200 C Dick Fisher Dr South North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 13. ENTIRETY This Contract contains all commitments and agreements of the parties hereto, and n ) other oral or written commitments shall have any force or effect if not contained herein. 14. SEVERABILITY In the event anyone or more of the provisions contained in this Contract shall f{ reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, iIIegè....~: or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision thereof and this Contract shall b, construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provisions had never been containet herein. 1996 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION 10 t - . #. 15. VENUE Should any action, real or asserted, at law or in equity, arise out of the terms and conditions of this Contract, venue for said action shall be in Tarrant County, Texas. 16. AUTHORITY This Contract is made for Fort Worth and Participating City as an Interlocal Agreement, pursuant to Texas Government Code, Chapter 791. 17. AUTHORIZATION The undersigned officers and/or agents of the parties hereto are properly authorized officials and have the necessary authority to execute this contract on behalf of the parties hereto, and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolutions extending such authority have been duly passed and are now in full force ~nd effect. EXECUTED IN TRIPLICATE this Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. day of , 1996, in Fort CITY OF FORT WORTH PARTICIPATING CITY By: Charles Boswell Assistant City Manager BY: Randy Shiflet Assistant City Manager ATTEST: ATTEST: City Secretary City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney City Attorney 1996 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION 11 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~partment: Police Department ~bject: Farly Hire of Crime Control District Positions Council Meeting Date: 08-05-96 Agenda Number: GN 96-90 During Fiscal Year 1995-96 the NRH Crime Control District (CCD) is expected to generate $794,236. Total operating expenditures for this FY are anticipated to be $20,004 to replace two (2) motorcycles. In the CCD budget for FY 1996-97 the Police Department has requested thirteen civilian and thirteen sworn positions. The first training academy for these new sworn employees begins the first Monday in October so we cannot get a head-start on the eight month training period before they can work alone. The civilians are quite another matter. In the CCD budget there are four detention officers, one Property Management Technician, one clerk in Community Service, one clerk in Professional Standards and five Public Service Officers (PSO). We have advertised the Detention officer position and have an established list from which to hire. We've done likewise to the Property Tech and the two clerical positions, but not the PSOs, nor the Crime Analyst. . We request that authorization be granted to hire seven (7) new employees. Four (4) Detention officers will cost $11,545, two (2) Public Safety Technicians will cost $4,925, while the Property Technicians will cost $2,721. The total cost of$19,191 can be funded from the FY 1995-96 Crime Control District funds. Recommendation: The Police Department be authorized to hire seven (7) civilian employees for the Crime Control District on or about September 2, 1996. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) A:>peratlng Budget -Õther - Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available epartment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director anager CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .epartment: City Secretary Subject: Appointment to Town Hall Committee Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: 8/12/96 GN 96-91 Place 3 on the Town Hall Committee is currently vacant. Mr. Jerry Tyner has been recommended for appointment to Place 3. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council take action on the proposed appointment. . Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _~ting Budget = (] (;Lat7lÌ6tå., ~ A Department Head Signature \ CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~~¿er Fln8nœ Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .epartment: Subject: City Secretary Appointment to Park and Recreation Board Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: 8/12/96 GN 96-92 Ms. Kami Graves has resigned as Alternate on the Park and Recreation Board. Ms. Cheryl Lyman has been recommended for appointment as Alternate. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council take action on the proposed appointment. . Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget _ f3i't.UuiL~ ~ Department Head Signature CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM FlnMc:e Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .partment: Subject: Administration Consideration of a Deep Water Well 7716 Davis Boulevard Council Meeting Date: 8/12/96 Agenda Number: G"I 96-93 On July 8th, 1996 Council received a request for drilling a deep well at 7716 Davis Boulevard. The action taken, at that time, was to deny this request. Since that time the petitioners drilled a well of 200 feet deep and was unsuccessful in getting water. Previously they were able to get water from the run- off from Davis Boulevard, but with the improvement to that street and the installation of the curb this is no longer possible. Councilwoman Johnson and Mayor Pro Tem Garvin have requested that this be put back on the agenda for your consideration at this time. In checking with the attorney for the City, Rex McEntire, he indicated that the Council has authority to act upon this request at any time it is placed on the agenda. It is not the same thing as reconsideration of an ordinance or resolution. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council consider this request. . Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ flther Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~~~ Department Head Signature City Manager CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM Fln..œ Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS D rt t Finance epa men: Council Meeting Date: 8/12/96 Subject: Setting Date for Public Hearings for 1996/97 City Budget, Parks and Recreation Development Corporation and Crime Control District Budgets Agenda Number: GN 96-94 In addition to the public hearing required by state law for the proposed tax rate, it is also necessary for City Council to set public hearings on the proposed 1996-97 City Budget, proposed projects of the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation, ånd the Crime Control and Prevention District Budget. A published notice will be required for each public hearing as per the City Charter and State law. The exact wording for each notice accompanies this cover sheet. Each hearing is set for August 26 beginning at 7:00 p.m. for the Park Corporation, 7: 15 p.m. for the Crime Control and Prevention District and 7:30 p.m. for the City Budget. Recommendation: It is recommended that Council approve the attached notices and set public hearings as stated on each notice. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GOlRev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget _ Othe. p _ ~ · :t:t.ß ead Signatu," CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director ~/L Manager Page 1 of . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 1996/97 PROPOSED ANNUAL BUDGET NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to all interested citizens in the City of North Richland Hills, that the City Council will hold a public hearing on the 1996/97 Proposed Annual Budget on Monday, August 26, 1996, during the regular City Council meeting at 7301 N.E. Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas, beginning at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. The proposed budget is available for inspection in the office of the City Secretary at City Hall between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. . . . . . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROJECTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing is to be held by the Board of Directors of the North Richland Hills Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation during a meeting to be held at 7:00 p.m. on August 26, 1996 at the North Richland Hills City Hall, 7301 NE Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas, on the Corporation funding and undertaking projects involving improvements and renovations to neighborhood and community parks (including, but not limited to, the construction of baseball and softball fields, neighborhood parks, building of hike and bike trails, the operations of the tennis center and the expenditure of funds to pay operating costs of city owned projects undertaken by the Corporation. A more detailed description of the projects to be undertaken by the Corporation covered by this notice is available for inspection in the office of the City Secretary, 7301 NE Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas. / . . . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing is to be held by the Board of Directors of the North Richland Hills Crime Control and Prevention District during a meeting to be held at 7:15 p.m. on August 26, 1996 at the North Richland Hills City Hall, 7301 NE Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas, on the proposed annual operating budget. The proposed budget is available for review in the office of the City Secretary, 7301 NE Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. '" CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 8/12/96 Subject: Record Vote on Proposed Tax Rate and Setting of Public Agenda Number: Hearing GN 96-95 In follow-up to the 1996/97 Budget Work Session, it is necessary to begin the notice and hearing procedures to establish a tax rate and approve the budget for the next fiscal year in accordance to the City's Charter and State law. The Council's consensus at the recent budget retreat was to set the tax rate for next fiscal year at 57¢, which is three quarters of one penny above the notice and hearing rate calculated in accordance with "Truth in Taxation" laws. The 57¢ tax rate would be divided as follows: Debt Service Maintenance and Operations 27.382¢ 29.618¢ 57.000¢ State law further requires a record vote be taken by Council concerning the proposed tax rate and that Council schedule a public hearing on the proposed rate. The results of the vote will then be published in the "Fort Worth Star Telegram" as a quarter page "Notice of Public Hearing on Tax Increase." A copy of the notice accompanies this cover sheet. Because of strict timing requirements that are also mandated by state law it is recommended to Council that the notice be published on Friday, August 16 and the public hearing be scheduled for the next regular meeting of Monday, August 26. Formal adoption of budget ordinance and tax rate ordinance for next year will be done at the September 9 Council meeting after the August 26 public hearing. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council take a record vote concerning the proposed tax rate of 57¢ and set a public hearing on the tax rate at 7:30 p.m. August 26, 1996. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Suffici t Funds Availab Operating Budget _ ~ Other Þn - W '7flv · tæ'¿¿ad S;gnature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director Page 1 of Notice of Public Hearing on Tax Increase . The City of North Richland Hills will hold a public hearing on a proposal to increase total tax revenues from properties on the tax roll in 1995 by 4.37 percent. Your individual taxes may increase at a greater or lesser rate, or even decrease, depending on the change in the taxable value of your property in relation to the change in taxable value of all other property. . The public hearing will be held on August 26, 1996 at 7:30PM at Council Chambers, City of North Richland Hills, 7301 NE Loop 820, North Richland Hills, TX. FOR the proposal: AGAINST the proposal: PRESENT and not voting: ABSENT: The statement above shows the percentage increase the proposed rate represents over the effective tax rate that the unit published on August 16, 1996. The following table compares taxes on an average home in this taxing unit last year to taxes proposed on the average home this year. Again, your individual taxes may be higher or lower, depending on the taxable value of your property. Average home value General exemptions available (amount available on the average home, not including senior citizen's or disabled person's exemptions) Average taxable value $68,648 $70,419 Tax rate (per $100) 0.570000 0.570000 Tax $391.29 $401.39 Under this proposal taxes on the average home would increase by $10.10 or 2.58 percent compared with last year's taxes. Comparing tax rates without adjusting for changes in property value, the tax rate would increase by $0.00 per $100 of taxable value or 0.00 percent compared to last year's tax rate. These tax rate figures are not adjusted for changes in the taxable value of property. Last Year $80,762 $12,114 This Year $82,846 $12,427 . · · · Notice of Vote on Tax Rate The City of North Richland Hills conducted a public hearing on a proposal to increase your property taxes by 4.37 percent on August 26, 1996. The City of North Richland Hills is scheduled to vote on the tax rate at a public meeting to be held on September 9, 1996, at 7:30 PM at City Council Chamber, 7301 NE Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Tx. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '" Department: Parks and Recreation Department Park Board Recommendations for Park Names - Subject: Resolution #96-14 Council Meeting Date: 8/12/96 Agenda Number: GN 96-96 The Park Facility Naming Committee consisting of board members Sharon Battles, Ann Perchard, Pam Jackson and J. Douglass Davis, met on two occasions to recommend park and recreation facility names to be discussed by the Park & Recreation Board and forwarded to the City Council for consideration. The Park & Recreation Board discussed proposed names and unanimously recommended the following names for three of our new facilities. 1. Neighborhood Park at Glenview & Dawn Streets: "Glenview Park" is the Board's recommended name for this neighborhood park. 2. Community Park adiacent to NRH20 & Emerald Hills Way: The Board had previously recommended the name "Walker's Branch Park" for the property that includes NRH20 and the proposed girls softball complex which is planned to have primary access from Emerald Hills Way. It was suggested that the Board evaluate the names "NRH20 Community Park" or "North Richland Hills Community Park". Considerable discussion was given to this proposal by the committee and the Board. The Board felt that the city had already used a variety of derivatives of "North Richland Hills" with "Northfield Park", "Richfield Park", "Norich Park", a proposed "North Hills Community Park" (in conjunction with the hospital) and that adding a "North Richland Hills Community Park" would contribute to confusion regarding the facilities or the possible misconception that the city only had one park. The Board agreed that NRH20 had established a strong market identity and that naming the entire park could reinforce that accomplishment, however the rest of the planned park elements include trails, natural areas, picnic facilities, and a girls softball complex. The park is divided by Walker's Branch Creek and access will be from two different locations. NRH20 will continue to be accessed from Highway 26. However, the west side of the park including the new girls softball complex and other park facilities will be accessed from Emerald Hills Way. The North Richland Girls Softball League does not believe a name associated with the water park will necessarily reflect the unique attributes of the girls softball complex. This user group currently uses softball facilities at "Fossil Creek Park" and like the idea of incorporating "Walker's Creek" into the name of the new park and softball complex. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available c:- ~ ~.- Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ~ Finance Dlrec10r Page 1 of 2- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS The Park & Recreation Board agreed, and supports the idea of integrating the names of the city's streams (Fossil Creek Park, Calloway Branch Trail, Little Bear Creek Park & Trail...) into the names of the city's parks and trails. Although the creek has been channelized south of the park it is still a natural meandering stream within the park property. The Board also liked the idea of incorporating one of the city's historic family names into the name of the park. Colonel Albert G. Walker founded the Birdville Union in 1857. Colonel Walker was involved in a shootout, which resulted in the death of J. Jeff Courtney, over a disagreement of where the county seat should be located (Birdville or Fort Worth). He was acquitted and later was elected to the state senate and tried to have the county seat election of 1856 overturned, returning the county seat to the Birdville/North Richland Hills area. With these thoughts in mind the Board modified their earlier recommendation of "Walker's Branch Park" to "Walker's Creek Park", for Council consideration. 3. North Tarrant Parkway at Little Bear Creek: The 96 acre park area at 7400 Wilson Lane is recommended to be named "Little Bear Creek Park". 4. Community Park at Smithfield Road & John Autry Street: This 36 acre park primarily developed as the soccer complex is recommended to be named "Green Valley Community Park". 5. Tennis Center: The Board and staff believe it is important to establish an independent identity for the tennis center that reflects that the center is managed and operated by the City of North Richland Hills and is open to the public, while being sensitive to reflecting the joint cooperation in development of the facilities. Establishing that identity will be very important in the marketing, program development, and ultimate success of the facility. With that in mind, the Park and Recreation Board recommended the name of "North Richland Hills Tennis Center". A joint committee of the School Board and City Council members (Mayor Brown, Mark Wood, and Jo Ann Johnson) met to consider names for the tennis center. They proposed "The Richland Tennis Center" as a name to be considered for the City's 'new tennis facility. They also asked that a logo incorporating both NRH and BISD be designed to be used for joint projects including the tennis center. The Board and Committee are still researching and evaluating potential names for Council consideration for the 100 acre city park and the 33.5 acre joint athletic facilities northeast of Richland High School. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Resolution No. 96-14 be approved incorporating Park and Recreation Board recommendations and the joint school/city committee. Attachments Paae Z. . of Z- RESOLUTION NO. 96-14 e A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS ESTABLISHING NAMES FOR PARK FACILITIES. WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 1866 establishes the procedures and guidelines for naming of park facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Park and Recreation Board, in accordance with these procedures, has considered proposed names for park facilities as recommended by the Park Facility Naming Committee; and, WHEREAS, the Park and Recreation Board has recommended the names for these park facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Joint City Council and School Board Committee also reviewed and recommended names for the jointly funded tennis facility; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: e SECTION 1: The Park Facility located at 6400 Glenview Drive be designated as "Glenview Park". SECTION 2: The Park Facility located at Emerald Hills Way be designated as "Walkers Creek Park". SECTION 3: The Park Facility located at 7400 Wilson Lane be designated as "Little Bear Creek Park". SECTION 4: The Park Facility located at 7701 Smithfield Road be designated as "Green Valley Community Park". SECTION 5: The Park Facility located at 7111 N. E. Loop 820 be designated as "The Richland Tennis Center". PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of August, 1996. APPROVED: - ATTEST: Tommy Brown, Mayor Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: e Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I~ Department: Public Works Revision of School Zone Hours at Subject: Richland High School - Ordinance NQ 2136 Council Meeting Date: 8/12/96 Agenda Number: GN 96-97 ßirdville Independent School District has requested that the school zone time be changed surrounding Richland High School. It is requested that the school zone time be as shown below: 7:30 a.m. 3:15 p.m. 8:30 a.m. 4:15 p.m. This ordinance would revise Ordinance No. 1830 which governs the school zone times within the City. The above shown information is the only change to be made to Ordinance No. 1830. Recommendation: It is recommended Council approve Ordinance No. 2136. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of - ORDINANCE NO. 2136 . AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1830 AS IT AFFECTS THE SCHOOL ZONES AT (RICH LAND HIGH SCHOOL) LEWIS DRIVE, DICK LEWIS DRIVE, HOLIDAY LANE, GREEN MEADOW DRIVE, LOLA DRIVE, AND JANETTA DRIVE; ESTABLISHING A PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT OF 20 MILES PER HOUR; PROVIDING FOR A PENAL TV FOR VIOLATION OF A FINE NOT IN EXCESS OF $200.00 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS; that: 1. That portion of Section 3.05 of Ordinance No. 722 dealing with the speed zone at Richland High School is amended as follows: Upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation heretofore made as authorized by the provisions of Section 169, Article 670ld, V.T.C.S., the Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on highways, the prima facie speed limits hereinafter indicated for vehicles are hereby determined and declared to be reasonable and safe, and such speed limits are hereby fixed for vehicles traveling upon the following named streets and highways, or parts thereof during the hereinafter designated hours, either (1) when such hours are described on official school speed limit signs located as said zones; or (2) when school zone signs bearing a flashing amber light and located at said zones are in operation. The location of said school zones and hours during which said speed zones shall be in effect are as follows, to-wit: The prima facie speed limit on the following public streets between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. and between the hours of 3:15 p.m. and 4:15 p.m. shall be 20 miles per hour: . Richland High School 6900 Lewis Drive 7000-7100 Dick Lewis Drive 5100-5400 Holiday Lane 7200 Green Meadow Drive 7200 Lola Drive 7200 Janetta Drive 2. Any person violating any portion of this ordinance shall be subject to a fine not in excess of $200.00. 3. law. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by PASSED AND APPROVED this the 12th day of August, 1996. APPROVED: Mayor Tommy Brown ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary . APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 8/12/96 Subject: Award of Contract for Professional Auditing Services Agenda Number: PU 96-59 The extension of the audit contract with KPMG Peat Marwick concluded with the September 30, 1995 Comprehensive Annual Financial Audit. On June 28, 1996 the City requested proposals for Professional Auditing Services from both local and national accounting firms by direct mail and newspaper advertisement. The proposal specifications were prepared by staff in such a way as to conform with nationally accepted govemmental auditing standards and in such a way to promote and protect the interests of the City of North Richland Hills. The proposal described every possible relevant aspect of the audit process from start to finish. The term of the engagement will be three years with two optional one-year renewals. Services to be provided include, but are not limited to: the annual audit of the City's financial statements, issuance of an annual Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, Single Audit Reports and other reports necessary for compliance With Federal requirements, and documentation necessary to comply With the requirements of the Texas Public Funds Investment Act of 1994. A preproposal conference With potential bidders was held where staff answered any questions that the bidders had concerning the specifications. The actual proposals submitted were broken into two major categories from each bidder: 1. A Technical Proposal describing their firm in depth and their audit management approach, and 2. A Sealed Dollar Cost Proposal that contained their cost of services estimate for the first three years of service to the City. A detailed multiple-page analysis of the five proposals that were received is attached that demonstrates in a dear and straightforward manner the various comparisons that were made of the relative strengths and weaknesses of each firm. A summary of the final evaluation for all five firms is located at the end of the analysis. Primary evaluation criteria scored numerically included the major categories of: 1. Expertise and Experience,2. Audit Approach, 3. Software Familiarity and Report Preparation, and finally, 4. Cost of Services. Several nonnumerically scored but mandatory elements are located on page one of the evaluation. The evaluation has shown that through a combination of all the critical elements involved, the best overall proposal has been received from the audit firm of KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP who received an overall rating of 108.77 points of a possible 115 points. The ratings received by the other four firms are as follows: Deloitte & Touche, LLP (106.23), Weaver and Tidwell, LLP (105.67), George, Morgan & Sneed, PC (88.39), and Rylander, Clay & Opitz, LLP (62.45). Recommendation: Staff recommends that the award of Professional Auditing Service be made to the accounting firm of KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP for a period of three years with two optional one-year renewals. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ mhO} ).=¡¡=y/ sI!zr GfJ - ~l!epa~;;;ld Signature "- CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~~G~ i City Manager Finance D..clot Page 1 of . . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES PREPARED FOR: CITY COUNCIL BY THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FINANCE DEPARTMENT AUGUST 7, 1996 . . . Mandatory Elements Deloitte & Touche Comments: George Morgan & Sneed Comments: KPMG Peat Marwick Comments: Rylander, Clay & Opitz Comments: Weaver & Tidwell Comments: Technical Qualifications Maximum Score - 30 Points Deloitte & Touche 1 Experience 2 Personnel George Morgan & Sneed 1 Experience 2 Personnel KPMG Peat Marwlck 1 Experience 2 Personnel Rylander, Clay & Opitz 1 Experience 2 Personnel Weaver & Tidwell 1 Experience 2 Personnel City of North Richland Hills Review of Proposals Professional Auditing Services Licensed Conflict of Interest Peer Review Training Yes > 100 hrs. Gov't Strong training. None 1994 Yes < 50 hrs. Gov't None 1993 Yes > 100 hrs. Gov't Strong training. None 1993 Overall Proposal Preparation Good Good Good Yes 40 hrs. annually None Missing Poor No report samples provided. Peer review (Appendix B) missing. Typos. Affiliated w/McGladrey Network. Yes Classes listed. None 1994 Maximum Rating Comments 15 15 Extensive government experience. 15 15 Govemment clients range In size. 15 7.33 Limited government experience. 15 9.33 15 15 Extensive government experience. 15 15 Government clients range In size. 15 7.33 Limited government experience. 15 10 15 15 Moderate government experience. 15 12.67 Small to medium gov't clients. Good Page 1 EVAL.WK4 City of North Richland Hills Review of Proposals Professional Auditing Services . Audit Approach Maximum Score - 25 Points Maximum Rating Comments Deloitte & Touche 1 Staffing Plan 15 15 656 Total Hours/32 Partner Hours 2 Sampling Techniques 5 5 Sr. + 2 or 3 Staff. 35% of staff have gov't expo 3 Analytical Procedures 5 5 Kile = 100% time working with gov't clients. George Morgan & Sneed 1 Staffing Plan 15 11.33 772 Total Hours/135 Partner Hours 2 Sampling Techniques 5 5 3 Analytical Procedures 5 5 KPMG Peat Marwick 1 Staffing Plan 15 14.67 1,000 Total Hours/121 Partner Hours 2 Sampling Techniques 5 5 All audit team members spend 100% of 3 Analytical Procedures 5 5 time working with gov'tlnon-profrt clients. Rylander, Clay & Opitz 1 Staffing Plan 15 10 814 Total Hours/142 Partner Hours 2 Sampling Techniques 5 5 No one with less than one year audit expo 3 Analytical Procedures 5 5 will work on our audit. Weaver & Tidwell . 1 Staffing Plan 15 11.33 700 Total Hours/56 Partner Hours 2 Sampling Techniques 5 5 25 professionals with gov't expo 3 Analytical Procedures 5 5 Familiarity with Software/Automated CAFR Maximum Score - 30 Points Maximum Rating Comments Deloitte & Touche 1 Software Familiarity 15 15 Experience with USTI software. 2 Automated CAFR 15 14.33 Automated CAFR. George Morgan & Sneed 1 Software Familiarity 15 10 Experience with software similar to USTI. 2 Automated CAFR 15 11.67 Partially automated CAFR. KPMG Peat Marwlck 1 Software Familiarity 15 15 Experience with USTI software. 2 Automated CAFR 15 15 Automated CAFR. Rylander, Clay & Opitz 1 Software Familiarity 15 0 Not addressed in RFP. 2 Automated CAFR 15 0 Weaver & Tidwell 1 Software Familiarity 15 13.33 Experience with USTI software, 2 Automated CAFR 15 13.33 Automated CAFR. e Page 2 EVAL.WK4 City of North Richland Hills Review of Proposals Professional Auditing Services . Price Comparisons 3 Year Cost Rating Deloitte & Touche $170,148 21.90 George Morgan & Sneed 129,700 28.73 KPMG Peat Marwick "154,600 24.10 Rylander, Clay & Opitz 148,330 25.12 Weaver & Tidwell 124,200 30,00 Price Comparison Point Award Calculation . Lowest 3 Year Price = 30 Points Score Deloitte & Touche $170,148 73.00% 21.90 George Morgan & Sneed 129,700 95.76% 28.73 KPMG Peat Marwick 154,600 80.34% 24.10 Rylander, Clay & Opitz 148,330 83.73% 25.12 Weaver & Tidwell 124,200 100.00% 30.00 . Page 3 EVAL.WK4 City of North Richland Hills Review of Proposals Professional Auditing Services . Total Points Awarded Technical Audit Software & 3 Year Qualifications Approach CAFR Cost Total Deloitte & Touche 30.00 25.00 29.33 21.90 106.23 George Morgan & Sneed 16.67 21.33 21.67 28.73 88.39 KPMG Peat Marwick 30.00 24.67 30.00 24.10 108.77 Rylander, Clay & Opitz 17.33 20.00 0.00 25.12 62.45 Weaver & Tidwell 27.67 21.33 26.67 30.00 105.67 . . Page 4 EVAl.WK4 . . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CONTRACT FOR AUDITING SERVICES This contract is made and entered into this day of August, 1996 by and between the CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, a municipal corporation in Tarrant County, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP, CPAs, (hereinafter referred to as the "Auditor"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City is a Municipal C<>rporation of the State of Texas, located at City Hall, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180, wherein the books and records of said City are kept. WHEREAS, the Auditor is a Certified Public Accountant, duly licensed in said capacity in the State of Texas, having paid all fees pursuant to such licensing, and the City being willing to employ the Auditor on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: Terms and Conditions 1. The Request for Proposal for Audit Services dated July 26, 1996 is incorporated into this agreement and all conditions and requirements of the Request for Proposal are hereinafter considered to be part of this agreement. 2. The fees for audit services shall be: Fiscal Year 1996 1997 1998 Total Financial Audit $ 40,000 $ 42,000 $ 44.100 $126,100 Single Audit $ 9,000 $ 9,500 $10.000 $28,500 Total not to Exceed $ 49,000 $ 51,500 $ 54.100 $154,600 3. While the objective of the examination is the expression of an unqualified opinion on the financial statements, it is understood that an opinion may have to be qualified or denied as the facts or circumstances dictate. The City has the responsibility for the proper recording of transactions in the books of account, for the safeguarding of assets, and for the substantial accuracy of the financial statements. Such are the representations of the City. In addition, it is understood that the examination is not primarily designed and cannot be relied upon to disclose defalcations and other similar irregularities, although their discovery may result. If irregularities are discovered, Auditor will report such irregularities to the City Manager, Director of Finance, or Accounting Manager as deemed appropriate. Page 1 . 4. City agrees to make progress payments on the basis of hours of work completed during the course of the engagement and out-of-pocket expenses incurred in accordance with the firm's dollar cost bid proposal. Interim billings shall cover a period of not less than a two-week period. Billings must include detail showing hours worked by staff levels and estimated hours of completion. Invoices received without this information will be returned unpaid. Invoices for Single Audit services shall be prepared using the same detail specifications for other billings mentioned previously. Invoices for Single Audit services shall not include any items other than those performed in connection with the Single Audit. Interim billing shall be sent based on percent of work completed, with final payment upon delivery of Single Audit Reports. 5. Auditor agrees that it will not at any time, either directly or indirectly, disclose or communicate to any person, firm or corporation in any manner whatsoever any information of any kind or description concerning any matters affecting or relating to the business of the City whether or not any or all of such matters would otherwise be deemed confidential material, unless otherwise required pursuant to law, or is so directed by the City. 6. This contract may be modified, or amended by mutual agreement of the parties. No waiver, modification or amendment of any term, condition or provision of this contract will be valid, or of any force or effect, unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto. . 7. A failure by the City to initiate action as to any breach shall not be deemed as a waiver of that right of action and all such initiated rights of action shall be cumulative. 8. This contract shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. 9. This contract shall be deemed to have been made and performed in Tarrant County, Texas. For purposes of venue, all suits or causes of action arising out of this contract shall be brought in the courts of Tarrant County, Texas. 10. It is agreed between the City and the Auditor that the contract shall be executed in an original and two (2) copies, anyone of which may be used for any purposes for which the original may be used. 11. It is the intent of the parties that nothing contained herein shall be interpreted to assign to Auditor any status under this Agreement other than that of an independent contractor. e 12. Auditor covenants that to the best of its knowledge, neither it nor any of its partners Page 2 . . . 15. or employees presently has any interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, in any matters subject to audit by the City of North Richland Hills or that would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services under this Agreement and that none of its partners are employees of the City, and that no one employed by the Auditor and no one who has or will have any financial interest under this Agreement is an officer or employee of the City. 13. No discrimination because of race, color, sex, age, handicap, national origin, ancestry or religion shall be made in the employment of persons performing services under this contract. Auditor covenants that it will comply with all nondiscrimination provisions of applicable federal law or executive order in the performance of this Agreement. 14. Indemnification Agreement As between the City and Auditor, the Auditor shall assume responsibility and liability only for any damage, loss or injury caused by or resulting from the negligent acts of the Auditor, or any of its officers, agents, servants, or employees, arising from the performance of work under this Agreement. The Auditor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and all of its officers, agents, servants, or employees from and against any and all such claims, loss, damage, charge, or expense to which they or any of them may reasonably be put or subjected by reason of any such negligent acts, but only if an adjudication of negligence is made against the Auditor. The Auditor expressly agrees to provide professional time, at no additional fee, required in the defense against any claims brought or actions filed against the City, where such claim or action arises from the negligent acts, but only if an adjudication of negligence is made against the Auditor. Insurance The Auditor certifies that it carries the following types of insurance: A. Statutory Workers' Compensation Insurance or proof that Auditor is not required to provide such coverage under State law. B. Professional Liability Insurance on the contractual services in this contract with limit of $1,000,000. C. Comprehensive Liability Insurance covering all operations and automobiles: (1) With limits of $100,000/$300,000 Bodily Injury (2) With limit of $50,000 Property Damage D. "Umbrella" or "Excess" coverage cannot be used to reach the limits stated in B and C. Page 3 . . . 16. This contract being one for professional services cannot be transferred, assigned or sublet without the prior written approval of the City. 17. This document contains the entire agreement between the parties and shall not be altered, varied or modified unless made in writing and signed by the parties. There are no other understandings, representations or agreements, written or oral, not incorporated herein. The terms of our engagement will also be confirmed in our engagement letter. 18. For the purposes of this Agreement, any notices required to be sent to the parties hereof shall be mailed to the following respective addresses: Auditor ~ City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have made and executed this Agreement the day and year above written. Auditor: City of North Richland Hills, Texas Partner Tommy Brown, Mayor WITNESS: ATTEST: By: Rex McEntire, City Attorney Signature Name (typed or printed) Page 4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Finance 1 Administration ... epartment: Subject: Ratify Purchase of Tables for Pre-Council Chambers Agenda Number: 8/12/96 PU 96-60 Council Meeting Date: As part of the City Hall expansion move-in budget, funds were allocated for the purchase of tables to be used in pre-council chambers. A special size was required to better utilize the space in this room. Also, the color needed to match the wood of the existing chairs. Bids were obtained for four tables. In order to have the tables in place by the September meeting the order was placed with Royer and Schutts Office Furniture in the amount of $5,802. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council ratify the purchase of tables from Royer and Schutts Office Furniture in the amount of $5,802. . Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ .ther Department Head Signature ft CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM Finance Director er Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Police Department Council Meeting Date: 8/12/96 Subject: Ratify Purchase of Motorola Radios Agenda Number: PU 96-61 As part of the Crime Control District budget, funds were allocated for the purchase of radios. To be compatible with the existing equipment these radios need to be manufactured by Motorola. The units presently used by the Police Department were discon~inued by Motorola as of July 31, 1996. In an effort to keep the equipment standardized, and to receive shipment of the radios by September 30, 1996 an order was placed for 14 radios. The total cost of this equipment is $31,248. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council ratify the purchase of radios from Motorola in the amount of $31,248. Finance Review ¿:. ment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance DlreClot Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Othe Page 1 of ...) . I· . . Finance Department: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date: 8/12/96 Subject: Approval of Contract with Reed Municipal Services, Inc. Agenda Number: PU 96-62 The City has received a proposal from Keith Reed to assist with the process of implementing the many requirements contained in the three contracts recently signed with the City of Watauga affecting the sale of a portion of our water system. Finance Department staff began the task of interpreting the general language of the three contracts into specific administrative procedures immediately after the agreements were signed. This has proven to be an extremely complex matter that holds the promise of much future consternation between the two cities over many important issues involving material sums of accounts receivable, water deposit funds, and many internal administrative procedures related to the ongoing business cycle of billing utility customers. The contracts also involve a variety of public works issues for both cities. Mr. Reed's attached proposal provides a very good brief description of the more critical issues. Mr. Reed's proposal is to function as a transition "Project Coordinator" who would act as the focal point for all actions required by the contracts. Equally important, Mr. Reed will also develop "Letters of Agreement" for both cities that will spell out in plain language the precise methodologies for handling the myriad of detail actions required by the contracts. These letters will minimize future disagreements and greatly reduce the likelihood of future litigation. Considering the magnitude of the issues involved and the level of experience and expertise Mr. Reed has to offer as a highly respected professional in this particular area of consulting, it is staffs belief that the City would be well served to retain Mr. Reed to assist with this critical transition. He has served the City well in past engagements. The proposed fee for this engagement is $26,400 as a maximum and may be less if circumstances are favorable. This fee would be paid over the 24 months of transition activities. The fee seems reasonable and relatively immaterial when compared to the amounts involved overall with this project. Sufficient funding is available in the Water and Sewer Fund budget for this expenditure. RE~QMMENDÃllO~ Staff recommends that Council accept Mr. Reed's proposal for professional services. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) g~::rsg BUd9~ ~~:t H.ad Signa'u,. ~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number 02-99-00-4820 Sufficien F nds Available Finan"" Director anager Page 1 of · · · REED MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC. ~Ms July 15, 1996 Mr. C. A. Sanford, City Manager City of North Richland Hills Holiday Lane North Richland Hills, Texas Mr. Sanford, Please accept our unsolicited proposal to serve as Project Coordinator for. the orderly transition of the sale of a portion of your Utility System to the City of Watauga. We understand that at the current time your city has signed three contract documents entitled "Settlement and Purchase Agreement Between the City of Watauga and the City of North Richland Hills", "Facilities. Operating Agreement Between The City of Watauga and the City of North Richland Hills" and "Joint Use Agreement Between the City of Watauga and the'City of North Richland Hills". While these three documents spell out the general terms of this transaction, they in no way detail the internal procedures that must be accomplished to assure an orderly transition of System operations, both_physical as well as financial, with a minimal amount of disruptions on the current operations. In order to accomplish this goal, we would like to propose the following: Item I We would propose that the firm of R.M.S. be engaged by the City of North Richland Hills to serve as Project Coordinator to provide all services required to accomplish an orderly transition of the system. The Project Coordinator would be responsible for developing all internal procedures required to meet the general terms and provisions in the Formal Contract Documents. The responsibilities of the Project Coordinator would include, but not be limited to the following: , H)1 rRnWI FY - ARIINí.TON TFXAc; 7!i01) · (8171 27';-8';28 - MOBILE (8171 988-8590 · Item II Develop "Letters of Agreemenf detailing the exact procedures that will be implemented to comply with the Formal Contract Document provisions. Procedures must be developed to accommodate the following: Accounts Receivable Ledger Meter Deposit Account Monthly payment documentation Ft. Worth Monthly Payment Scheduling Physical System Separation Subtractioñ Meter Installations System Work Orders, Joint Use Facilities Annual Settle up payment to Ft. Worth (Water) Meter Installation Costs ROW work notification Calculation of Joint Use 0 & M Fee Calculation of Replacement Fund Payments Plus other procedures too numerous to list CCN Transfer · A short discussion of each of the above is presented: Accounts Receivable at "Date of Transfer" On the "Date of Transfer" each customer in Watauga will have an Accounts Receivable balance on the General Ledger of the City of North Richland Hills. This account receivable represents Revenue due to the City of North Richland Hills for which funds have already. been expended in providing service. A procedure must be developed to ensure that: North Richland recovers.. this amount of funds from Watauga customers rather than sending the funds to Watauga during the initial months of the contract. . Meter Deposit Account: The contract documents stipulate that all future collections for Meter Deposits after "Date of Transfer" will be collected by the City of Watauga and a copy of the receipts for these deposits will be sent to North Richland Hills on a monthly basis. A new internal procedure will be required to accommodate this operation. If any of these "new customer's" who open accounts after the "Date of Transfer" close out their account and leave the City, there will be no deposit on hand at North Richland Hills to apply the final bill to. · Monthly Payment Documentation: · While the Formal Contract Documents are quite clear as to the date of any payments required by either city, in the majority of instances they are mute as to the documentation required in calculating these payments and which supporting documentation shall be provided with the required payments. Ft. Worth Monthly Payment Schedule: The Formal Contract Documents state that the monthly payments for collection to Watauga shall be reduced by the amount of their proportional share of the services provided by Fort Worth for Water Supply and Wastewater Service. These collections are then sent to -Watauga by the 10th of the month. This process poses a problem in that Ft. Worth reads these meters on the first of each month and the bills are sent to North Richland Hills and in most instances arriving after the 10th of each month. It would appear that a change in the meter reading date should be explored with the City of Ft. Worth. Physical System Separation: · ';.';: ~ '1 A plan should be developed to ensure that the planning and engineering for this· separation should be accomplished during the heavy use periods of.· the year ... :. and the actual work should be accomplished during the winter or lower use . periods to precluded any water shortages or dramatic loss in pressure. ··This separation must be totally accomplished by the end of the second year after "Date of Transfer". . Subtraction Meters: Planning must be implemented to determine the type and size of the subtraction meters. This engineering work must be done in adequate time to receive the approval of all parties prior to construdion. Construction must be complete and should be tested for a short period of time prior to two years after the "Date of Transfer" System Work Orders, Joint Use Facilities: An internal system must be developed to ensure that all work orders that relate· to Joint Use Facilities are provided to Watauge. No such system is in place at the current time. Annual Settle Up Payment to Ft. Worth: · Is this payment to be made by Watauga in monthly payments or one annual . payment. It should be understood that this settle up is made after the close of a physical year. · Meter Installation Costs: It should be determined what constitutes "Installation Costs". Is it only the cost of the meter or does it include the other items required, i.e. meter box, Corporation Stop, Saddle, Curb Stop and pipe? Also does it include any labor required and equipment required? Right-of-Way Notification: A system must be developed to notify the City of Watauga any time that work will be required in their Rights-of-Way. No system is currently in place to provide for this requirement. Calculation of Joint Use Fees: An internal procedure must be develop to develop these joint use fees on an annual basis. No such procedure is in place at this time. · Replacement F~~d Payment: A procedure must be developed to provide for the addition or deletion of facilities described as Joint Use Facilities., The Formal Contract Documents describe and list the Joint Use Facilities as they are today but are mute as to any required changes that might be required in the future relating to such facilities. Transfer of Certificate of Convenience and Necessity: ' In order to accomplish this transfer, itwill be necessary to meet with the Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission, (TNRCC), to determine what procedures must accomplished in order to·, assign a portion' of ,the CCN to Watauga. While the above discussed procedures are the major concerns at this time, there will be, by necessity, any number of other items that must be accomplished to provide for the orderly transition of the system to Watauga. Item III: Scope of Services to be Provided by R.M.S. · If R.M.S. is selected to perform the duties of Project Coordinator, we will develop a complete set of "Letters of Agreemenf that outline, in 'detail, the specific requirements that will be required to accomplish the above tasks. This will include developing all forms to be used (Printing not included), meetings with representatives of North Richland Hills, Watauga, outside engineers, City of Fort Worth, auditors and TNRCC representatives. After developing these "Letters of Agreemenf, in conjunction with all parties involved, we will present our copies to · the respective Councils of the two cities for their review and approval. Upon approval of these Letters, we will work with your staff to ensure that the provisions, as outlined and defined, are accomplished on a timely basis. Item IV: Project Cost R.M.S. proposes to accomplish the above tasks on or before the initial twenty four month period after "Date of Transfer". During this twenty four month period we propose to devote a minimum of 320 professional hours of service. Our cost proposal for this service is $26, 400. This fee will be billed at the rate of $1;100 per month if the project requires. If the project is completed prior to the twenty .four month period and the 320 hours were not required, a settle up payment will be made by R.M.$. or North Richland Hills using an hourly rate of $82.50 per hr. based upon the actual hrs. required to accomplish the project. R.M.S. bills clients on the first of each month for actual hrs. worked plus out-of-pocket expenses billed at cost. We would be pleased to meet with you to further discuss our possible· , involvement in this vitally important project. ~.," , · í{jY). 5. j ];J(c,. R.M.S., Inc. Accepted Title Date City of North Richland Hills · CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Contract for Laboratory Services with the Trinity River Authority Council Meeting Date: 8/12/96 Subject: Agenda Number: PW 96-38 This is a standard contract that we sign each year with the Trinity River Authority for the purpose of laboratory testing of sewer samples, water samples, etc. This contract is to be effective from October 1, 1996 through September 30, 1997. The proposed fees have increased overall approximately 10% to 15% on the average. The funding source for this testing has been included in the Utility Operating Budget for 1996/97. Recommendation: The staff recommends the Council approve this contract with the Trinity River Authority for laboratory testing services for fiscal year 1996/97. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director ~ City Manager Page 1 of CONTRACT FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES . I. CONTRACTING PARTIES North The Receiving Agency: City of Richland Hills . whose authorized address is 7301 N.E. Loop 820. P.o. Box 820609, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76182-0609 The Performing Agency: Trinity River Authority of Texas. whose authorized address is 5300 South Collins. P. O. Box 240. Arlington. Texas 76004-0240. Attention: Danny F. Vance. General Manager (or his designated representative). II. STATEMENT OF SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED In order to discharge the responsibilities associated with the enforcement of Federal. State. and City regulations. the Receiving Agency requires services of a laboratory qualified to perform water and wastewater analysis. and of personnel to conduct industrial inspection and/or sampling services. such services detailed in Section A. Subsection(s) 1 2. & 1 . below. A. PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES . 1. Industrial InsQection Services In keeping with the foregoing. the Receiving Agency employs the Performing Agency and the Performing Agency agrees to perform industrial inspection services within the parameters listed on the attached schedule sheet. The Performing Agency (Trinity River Authority of Texas) shall perform all Industrial Pretreatment Inspections. review permit applications and prepare for submittal Permits to DischarGe Industrial Wastes to the Sanitary Sewer in accordance with procedures established by the Trinity River Authority of Texas in accordance with 40 CFR Part 403.8. Industrial Pretreatment Inspections. Application reviews and Permit preparations and 'submittals shall be in compliance with the Receiving Agency's Industrial Waste Ordinances. Sewer Ordinances Numbers . and EPA General Pretreatment Regulations for Existing and New Sources. Records of Inspections. Applications and Permits shall be maintained as required by EPA General Pretreatment Regulations. 40 CFR Part 403.12. . 2. Industrial SamQlinG Services In keeping with the foregoing. the Receiving Agency employs the Performing Agency and the Performing Agency agrees to perform industrial sampling services within the parameters listed on the attached schedule sheet and in accordance with the Receiving Agency's Industrial Waste Ordinances and Sewer Ordinances Numbers 1773 & 381 . The Performing Agency (Trinity River Authority of Texas) shall perform all sample collections. sample preservation. and maintenance of chain-of-custody records in accordance to the approved procedures set forth in Test Methods for Evaluatin~ SOli~ W~~t~. EPA Manual SW-846. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Wa_er an_ W_ t_s. EPA Manual EPA-600/ 4-79-020. and the Handbook for SamolinG and Sãmole Preservation of Water and Wastewater. EPA Manual EPA-600/4-82-029. The samples shall be properly collected. preserved and delivered by the Performing Agency to the Performing Agency's laboratory located at 6500 West Singleton Blvd.. Grand Prairie. Texas. When feasible flow or time composited sampling will be conducted. When composited sampling is not feasible. grab sampling will be appropriate. 3. Analytical Services In keeping with the foregoing. the Receiving Agency employs the Performing Agency and the Performing Agency agrees to perform analytical services within the parameters listed on the attached schedule sheet. . The Receiving Agency estimates an average of 85 samples per month will be collected and delivered to the laboratory for analysis. It is understood that these samples will be properly collected and preserved in accordance with applicable sections of A Practical Guide to Water Qualitv Studies of Streams. Federal Water Pollution Control Administration publication and Methods for Chemical Analysis for Water and Wastes. EPA manual. as well as the latest edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. A chain-of- custody procedure shall be maintained in the field and the laboratory in accordance with procedures to be established by the Receiving Agency. The Receiving Agency will furnish chain-of-custody tags. The Performing Agency (Trinity River Authority of Texas) will perform all analyses according to the approved procedures set forth in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. current edition or the latest edition of Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA manual. Samples will be analyzed by these methods on the production basis. to include appropriate analytical quality assurance procedures. Records will be kept for documentation of the Performing Agency's quality assurance program and copies will be available to the Receiving Agency upon request. Unusual interferences and problems will be reported to the Receiving Agency at its authorized address noted above. Research into specific techniques to overcome these difficulties will be undertaken when practical. and by mutual agreement. The sample information sheet submitted with each sample will designate the particular analysis or analyses to be made of each sample submitted. The laboratories will be operated in such a manner as to insure the legal sufficiency of the sample handling; analytical and reporting procedures; and to remedy effects in the procedures should such be discovered. The various laboratory personnel shall be directed upon receipt of written notice from the Receiving Agency 72 hours in advance. to appear and testify in enforcement actions. In such event. travel and per diem expenses for such employees shall be paid by the Receiving Agency. Travel and per diem for court appearances hereunder shall be based on current State laws. Receiving Agency ~y deliver to Performing Agency samples for analysis separate and apart from those samples collected by the Performing Agency. When the Receiving Agency delivers samples to the Performing Agency for analysis. the Receiving Agency shall indicate the nature and extent of the analyses it desires to be conducted. Performing Agency shall not be responsible for the manner of collection or chain-of-custody tags or sheets which are matters entirely outside Perfonning Agency's control. Performing Agency shall receive. log and perform such analyses of samples in accordance with that part of the chain-of-custody procedures identified as Transfer of Custody and Shioment attached hereto. Samples analyzed to maintain the normal quality assurance program which the Performing Agency presently maintains in its laboratory will be charged to the Receiving Agency at the same rate as submitted samples. B. TERMINATION Either party to this Contract may terminate the Contract by giving the other party thirty (30) days notice in writing at their authorized address as noted previously. Upon delivery of such notice by either party to the other and before expiration of the thirty (30) day period. the Performing Agency will proceed promptly to cancel all existing orders. contracts. and obligations which are chargeable to this Contract. As soon as practicable after notice of termination is given. the Performing Agency will submit a voucher for work performed under this Contract through its termination. The Receiving Agency will pay the Performing Agency for the work performed less all prior payments. Copies of all completed or partially completed reports. documents. and studies prepared under this Contract will be delivered by the Performing Agency to the Receiving Agency when and if this Contract is terminated prior to the completion of the prescribed work. . . C. AMENDING THE CONTRACT . The parties hereto without invalidating this Contract may alter or amend this Contract upon advance written agreement of both parties to exclude work being performed or to include additional work to be performed and to adjust the consideration to be paid hereunder by virtue of alterations or amendments. I I r. BASIS FOR CALCULATING REIMBURSABLE COSTS The financial basis for calculating reimbursable costs shall be as stated in Attachment A. The expenditures by the Trinity River Authority of Texas of funds paid to it under this Contract shall be subject to such State or Federal audit procedures as may be required by law and by accepted practices of the State or Federal auditor, or both, if requested. The Trinity River Authority of Texas shall be responsible for maintaining books of account that clearly. accurately and currently reflect financial transactions. The financial records must include all documents supporting entries on the account records which substantiate costs. The Trinity River Authority of Texas must keep the records readily available for examination for a period of three (3) years after the close of the last expenditure. Reimbursement for the inspection. sampling, and/or analytical costs, and cost for any travel and per diem expenses shall not exceed Fifteen Thousand dollars ($ 15,000.00 ) for the period of this Contract. IV. CONTRACT AMOUNT . The total amount of this Contract shall not exceed Fifteen Thousand dollars ($ 15.000.00 ) nor be less than One Hundred dollars ($ I 00 . 00 ) . V. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES The Performing Agency shall bill the Receiving Agency monthly for services performed. Charges for these services shall be based on the attached cost schedules. The Receiving Agency shall pay the monthly billings of the Performing Agency within thirty (30) days of their receipt. VI. TERM OF CONTRACT This Contract is to begin terminate Spprpmher 10 October 01. -' 191L. 19.2i.. and shall VII. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT Inasmuch as the Receiving Agency and the Performing Agency are political subdivisions of this state. and inasmuch as the testing of water and wastewater are critical to the maintenance of public health and such testing is therefore. a governmental function and service. this contract shall be deemed authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation Act. art. 4413(32c). Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. . . Receiving Agency: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY: TITLE: MAYOR Tommy Brown DATE: ATTEST: ( SEAl) . . Performing Agency: TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS BY: GENERAL MANAGER DATE: ATTEST: (S EAl) CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY PROCEDURES . SamDle Collection 1. To the maximum extent achievable. as few people as possible should handle a sample. 2. Stream and effluent samples should be obtained using standard field sampling techniques and preservation procedures, 3. Chain-of-Custody tags or sheets should be attached to each sample at the time it is collected. The tag or sheet contains basically laboratory (requested parameters) information: however. certain identifying items including City, City Code, Type Sample. Material Sampled. and Method of Preservation must be completed by the field personnel collecting the sample. In completing the Chain-of-Custody tag or sheet. care should be utilized to insure that all necessary information is correctly and legibly entered onto the form. A black ballpoint with water proof ink should be used at all times. 3. . 4. 5. 6. 7. Transfer of Custody and ShiDment 1. All samples should be handled by the minimum possible number of persons. 2. All incoming samples shall be received by the custodian. or his alternate. and logged into a record book (log book). Information to be entered into the Log Book shall include the sample number. date received. source. time(s) sampled. date(s) sampled, and analyses requested. Promptly after logging. the custodian will distribute the sample to an analyst or place the sample in the sample room. which will be locked at all times except when samples are removed or replaced by analysts. The custodian shall ensure that heat-sensitive samples. or other sample materials having unusual physical characteristics. or requiring special handling. are properly stored. and maintained. Samples shall be kept in the sample storage security area at all times when not actually being used by analysts. such as during overnight absences. The analysis sheet will be signed and dated by the person performing the tests and retained as.a per~anent record in the laboratory. Test results shall be sent by the laboratory to the appropriate Receiving Agency control point. . . . . Trinity River Authority of Texas Central Regional Wastewater System P.O. Box 531196 Grand Prairie. Texas 75053 Metro (214) 263-2251 Fax: (214) 264-1382 ç.,./ f'J1 ,'" ')ç::;'J.l1h1 () TECHNICAL SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE FOR LABORATORY ANALYSES INDUSTRIAL INSPECTIONS AND INDUSTRIAL SAMPLING " FISCAL YEAR 1996 December 1, 1995 through November 30, 1996 ATTACHMENT A tm ~ ® R,,,,dudl'J,,,,' · CffEMICAl ANALYSES ..' . ~TER Alkalinity, Total Alkalinity, Pheolphthalein Bicarbonate Carbonate Biochemical Oxygen Demand (B005) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (C-BOD5) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (C-BOD20) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (B0020) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD-7) Chemical Oxygen Demand Chloride ChromÏl..m Hexavalent Conductance, Specific Conductance, Diluted Cyanide Cyanide (Amendable to Chlorination) Fluoride, Dissolved Fluoride, Total Glycols Hardness Ignitability (Pensky-Martens) Nitrogen: Anmoni a Kjeldahl, Total Nitrate .itrite rganic and Grease ICP/M METAL ANAlYSES (TOTAL) $10.00 EACH Antimony Bariun Beryll iun caóni un Chromiun Cabal t Copper Iron lead Manganese Mo l ybdenun Hickel Silver Telluriun $7.75 EACH (DISSOLVED) Alunif1U11 Boron Calciun Magnesiun Potassiun Silica Sodiun $14_85 EACH Arsenic Seleniun lead - low Level Copper - Low Level Cadmiun - Low Level Chromiun Hexavalent - Low Level 4111Jlliun - Low Level $13.25 EACH Hercury $ 6.10 $ 6.10 $ 8.75 S 8.75 S 16.25 S 17.15 S 16.75 S 16.25 $ 16.25 S 8.50 S 6.10 S 11.85 S 4.85 $ 8.35 S 30.00 $ 36.35 $ 9.90 $ 9.50 $ 7.80 $ 9.30 $ 37.00 $ 7.00 $ 15.00 $ 6.85 $ 6.85 $ 25.65 S 29.00 pH pH Sediment Phenols: High level low level Phosphorus: Crtho Total Solids: Total (TS) Total Dissolved(TDS) Total Suspended(TSS) Volatile Suspended (VSS) After TSS Sulfate Sulfide Surfactants . MBAS Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Total Organfc Carbon Turbidity sa> IMEJ/T Chemi ca l Oxygen Demand Cyanide Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total Oil and Grease Phosphorus, Total Solids, Total Volatile Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons PRIORITY POlLUTAJIT METALS $142.95 TOTAl Thall i un Tin Uraniun Vanadiun Zinc Antimony Arsenic Berylliun Caóni un Chromiun Copper lead Mercury Nickel Seleniun Silver Thalliun Zinc SAMPLE PREPARATION Sediment and Oi ls EP Toxicity leachate TClP Toxicity leachate T\JC leachate S 14.75 S 67.00 S 85.00 s 36.60 S 3.65 $ 6.25 $ 35.00 S 40.00 $ 6.85 $ 11.15 S 5.85 $ 9.65 $ 8.45 S 4.15 S 15.55 $ 7.25 $ 31.15 $ 50.00 $ 11.15 $ 4.50 $ 23.20 $ 32.65 S 18.00 $ 24.60 S 13.00 $ 9.60 $ 43.90 . GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY AHAL YSES PESTICIDES/PCB'S PRIORITY POLLUTAHTS (GC/MS) $125.00 Quoted upon request Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Organophosphate Pesticides, and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Sample preparation, extraction, and clean-up per sample) ADD for Chlorinated Hydrocarbon (Confirmation and quantification per sample) ADD for Organosphosphate Pesticide (Confirmation and quantification per sample) ADD for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) . Uater (Confirmation and quantification per sample) ADD for PCB - Oil (Confirmation and quantification per sample) $107.25 Volati les Base Neutrals Acid Extractables Pesticides/PCB's $ 53.00 ORGANIC DETERMINATION (GC) Hydrocarbon/Sol vents $ 105.00 $ 56.65 General Hydrocarbon/Solvent Scan (VOA) (One column); *Five or less components; including quantification General Hydrocarbon\Solvent Scan (VOA) (Two column); *Five or less components; including quantification Volatile Organic Constituents (EPA regulated - method 601/602) *ADD fifteen dollars ($15) for each extra component scanned and quantified $ 59.85 $ 160.00 $ 38.35 $ 63.50 TR I HALOMETHAHES Trihalomethanes $ 1,1.50 SAMPLE PREPARATION HERBICIDES Chlorinated Phenoxy Acid Herbicides (Confirmed andi quantified) . . $115.00 ADD for Special Treatment/Per $ 19.1,0 Sample (Sediment, Oil) ADD for Special Treatment/Per Sample $ 67.00 (EP Toxicity Leachate) ADD for Special Treatment/Per Sample $ 85.00 (TClP Toxicity leachate) SPECIAL AMAl YSES TCLP/EP TOXICITY PRIORITY POtLUTAJlTS leachate Extraction Procedure $ 85.00· Metals: Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium Chromium, Lead, Mercury, Selenium Silver $ 92.95 Organics: Endrin; lindane; Methoxychlor; Toxaphene; 2, 1" 0; 2, 1" 5-TP Si lvex $275.25 Cyanides Metals Organics $ 30.00 $11,2.95 Quote HICR08IOlOGICAl AMAlYSES Chlorophyll "a" Chlorophyll "a" and Pheophytin "a" Coliform, Fecal (MF) Coliform, Fecals (MPN) Coliform, Total (MF) Coliforms, Total (MPN) Col Horms, Total (HMO/MUG) , Microscopic General Examination Microtox, Bacterial Bioassay Streptococcus, Fecal (MF) Heterotrophic Plate Count $ 8.15 $ 8.15 $ 9.00 S 50.00 $ 8.90 S 30. 7S $ 8.1,5 $ 9.35 $ 1,3.50 $ 9.35 $ 9.25 . ~USTRIAl PRETREATMENT SERVICES INDUSTRIAl SAMPLING INDUSTRIAL INSPECTIOH C~ite Safl1Jle Additional Composite Safl1Jle Grab S~le Additional Grab Sample $ 75.00 $ 25.00 $ 35.00 $ 10.00 Inspection/On Site $ 70.00 - Installation of Automatic Composite Samplers - Grab Sampl i ng - Delivery to TRA laboratory - Field Testing Available - S~le Preservation - Proper Chain of Custody - Permit Application Review - Verification of Application Data - Consultation with Industries on Industrial Pretreatment - Chemical Inventory Review GEJlERAl SERVICE INFORf4ATlON 1. Effective Date: December 1, 1995, all prices listed are per sample and subject to review. 2. All analyses are run in accordance with "Standard Methods for the Examination of Uater aOd Uastewater," 18th Edition, 1992 and/or EPA "Manual of Methods for Chemical Analysis of Uater end Uastes," 1983 and the 3rd Edition of Solid Uaste Manual SU 846. 3. The prices effective December 1, 1995 include a 10 X charge added to the analyses cost to maintain the normal quality assurance program. 4. Customer required priority laboratory s~les c<lq)leted and reported within SOX of the nonnal time will be billed at one and one:'half times the routine rate. Emergency s~les run inmediately or ASAP will be billed at two times the routine rate. . S~le preparations, if required, are charged additionally as listed. 6. ~le containers, preservatives, and ,&upplies will be provided upon request at a reasonable charge. Bacte- riological s~l ing suppl ies are included in the cost of the analyses. 7. S~les* should be delivered to the laboratory before 4:30 p.m. on weekdays. Samples camot be accepted on weekends or hol iclays unless special årrangements are made in advance. *(Bacteriological s~les should be delivered prior to 2:00 p.m. unless special arrangements are made in advance. After-hour samples may be left in cold storage vault with analyses request form.) 8. Billing statements for c<lq)leted monthly analyses are mailed by the 15th of the following month. 9. laboratory hours are weekdays 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and weekends 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 10. Environmental Field, Engineering Field and Pretreatment Services office hours are Honday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. For after-hour emergencies, leave message with computer operator. 11. Environmental Field and Engineering Field Services are requested to be scheduled a minimum of 72 hours in advance. FOR MORE INFORHATION, CONTACT: HETRO: (214) 263:2251 FAX: (214) 262-0619 Patricia H. Cleveland Manager, Technical Services B ill Cyrus laboratory Division Chief Cynthia Belvin Pretreatment Coordinator Robert J. Roth Technical Services Engineer Kimberly Brown, Quality Assurance Coordinator . . . Trinity River Authority of Texas . . Central Regional Wastewater System . ., .t . ' P.O. Box 531196 Grand Prairie, Texas 75053 :.1etro (214) 263-2251 Fax: (214) 264-1382 TECHNICAL SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE FOR LABORATORY ANALYSES INDUSTRIAL INSPECTIONS AND INDUSTRIAL SAMPLING FISCAL YEAR 1997 December 1. 1996 through November 30. 1997 ATTACHMENT' A ~ . CHEMICAL ANALYSES \.lATER 'Lo Alkal inity, Total $ 6.50- ,z..o Alkalinity, Phenolphthalein $ 6.50- 7) Bicarbonate $ 9.20- 75" Carbonate $ 9.20- 1"6 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOOS) $ 17.10 - Ze> Biochemical Oxygen Demand (C-B005) $ 18.00- /{' Biochemical Oxygen Demand (C-B0020) $ 17.60- /)" Biochemical Oxygen Demand (B0020) $ 17.10- Ie:, Biochemical Oxygen Demand (Boo-7) $ 17.10_ 13 Chemical Oxygen Demand $ 9.00- ICf Chloride $ 6.40- I] Chromiun Hexavalent $ 12.45 - Conductance, specific $ 5.10- Conductance, Diluted $ 8.70- II Cyanide $ 31.50 - Cyanide (Amendable to Chlorination) $ 38.15 - c¡ fluoride, Dissolved $ 10040- II fluoride, Total $ 10.00- 13 Glycols $ 8.00- 34- Hardness $ 9.70- 2v Ignitability (Pensky-Hartens) $ 38.85- Nitrogen: Aømon i a KJeldahl, Total Nitrate Nitrite .organiC l and Grease . . $ 7.35- $ 15.00- $ 7.20- $ 7.20- $ 26.95'- $ 30.45 - " IrP/M METAl ANALYSES (TOTAL) $10.00 EACH . . . Antimony Bari un Berylliun Cadni U1I Chromiun Cobalt Copper Tha II i un Tin Uraniun Vanadi un Zinc Iron lead Hanganese Hol ytxIenun Nickel Silver Telluriun , . $8.00 EACH (DISSOlVED) Aluninun Boron Calciun Hagnesiun Potassiun Sil ica Sodiun $15.50 EACH Arsenic Seleniun Lead - low Level Copper - low Level Cadmiun - Low Level Chromiun Hexavalent - low level .hall iun - Low Level $13.90 EACH Mercury pH pH Sediment Phenols: High Level low level Phosphorus: Or tho Total Sol ids: 14- Total (TS) I r Total Dissolved(TDS) 14- Total ~pended(TSS) Volati le Suspended (VSS) After TSS Sulfate Sulfide Surfactants - HBAS ~ Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Total Organic Carbon Turbidity SED I HENT Chemi ca l Oxygen Demand Cyani de Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total Oi l and Grease Phosphorus, Total Solids, Total Volatile Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons P1HOIUTY POllUTAJlT METALS $144.90 TOTAL Antimony Arsenic Berylliun Caåniun Chromiun Copper lead Hercury Nickel Seleniun Si lver Tha II i un Zinc SAMPLE PREPARATION Sediment and Oils ' EP Toxicity leachate TClP Toxicity leachate HIC leachate $ 15.00 $ 70.35 $ 85.00 $ 38.00 $ 3.85 - ' $ 6.50:- $ 35.00 - $ 40.00 - $ 7.20- $ 11.70- $ 6.00- $ 10.00 - $ 8.75- $ 5.00- $ 15.55""- $ 7.25- $ 32.50- $ 52.50 - $ 11.75- $ 4.70- $ 24.40 - $ 34.30 - $ 18.00 - $ 25.85- $ 13.65'- $ 10.00- S 43.90 ~oç Sz.Ot. q./ % : -~.. . . CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSES PRIORITY POLLUTANTS (GC/HS) PESTICIDES!PCB'S Volatiles Base Neutrals Acid Extractables $ 125.00 $ 248.50 $ 248.50 Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Organophosphate Pesticides, and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Sample preparation, extraction, and clean-up per sample) ADD for Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Pesticides 608 (Confirmation and quantification per sample) ADD for Organophosphate Pesticide (Confirmation and quantification per sample) ADD for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) - Uater (Confirmation and quantification per sample) ADD for PCB - Oil (Confirmation and quantification per sample) $ 107.25 ORGANIC DETERMINATION (GC) Hydrocarbon/So l \Ie'Its $ 55.65 General Hydrocarbon/Solvent Scan (VOA) (One column); *Five or less components; including quantification Volatile Organic Constituents (EPA regulated - method 601/602) *ADD fifteen dollars ($15) for each extra component seamed and quantified. TIn HAlOETHANES T ri ha l omethanes $ 105.00 $ 59.50 $ 62.85 $ 65.00 $ 40.25 $ 41.50 HERBICIDES SAMPLE PREPARATION Chlorinated Phenoxy Acid Herbicides (Confirmed a~ quantified) ¡ . $ 115.00 ADO for Special Treatment/Per $ 20.30 Sample (Sediment, Oil) ADD for Special Treatment/Per Sample $ 70.35 (EP Toxicity leachate) ADO for Special Treatment/Per Sample $ 85.00 (TClP Toxicity leachate) . " , SPECIAl AJIAlYSES Ta.P/EP TOXICITY " PRIORITY POllUTAHTS . . . Cyanides Metals $ 31.50 $ 144.90 leachate Extraction Procedure Metals: Arsenic, Barium" Caånium Chromium, lead, Mercury, Selenium Silver $ 104.90 Organics: Endrin; lindane; Methoxychlor; Toxaphene; 2, 4, 0; 2, 4, 5-TP Silvex $ 85.00 $ 277.90 "ICROBIOlOGICAl ANALYSES Chlorophyll "a" $ Ch lorophyll "a" and Pheopliyt i n "a" $ Coliform, Fecal (HF) $ Coliform, Fecals (HPN) $ Coliform, Total (HF) $ Coliforms, Total (HPN) $ Coliforms, Total (HMO/HUG) $ Microscopic General Exam~nation $ Hicrotox, Bacterial Bioassay $ Streptococcus, Fecal (MF) $ Heterotrophic Plate Count $ 8.55 8.55 9.45 52.50 9.35 32.30 8.80 9.80 45.65 9.80 9.70 . . ' ~RIAL PRETREATMENT SERVICES INDUSTRIAL SAMPLING INDUSTRIAL INSPECTIOtI composite Sample Additional Composite Sample Grab S~le Additional Grab Sample $ 75.00 $ 25.00 $ 35.00 $ 10.00 Inspection/On Site $ 70.00 - Installation of Automatic Composite Samplers - Grab Sampl ing - Del ivery to TRA Laboratory - Field Testing Available - Sample Preservation - Proper Chain of Custody - Permit Application Review - Verification of Application Data - Consultation with Industries on Industrial Pretreatment - Chemical Inventory Review GENERAL SERVICE INFORMATIOtI 1. Effective Date: December 1, 1996, all prices listed are per sample and subject to review. 2. All analyses are r", in accordance with "Standard Methods for the Examination of Uater and Uastewater," 18th Edition, 1992 and/or EPA MManual of Methods for Chemical Analysis of Uater and Uastes,M 1983 and the 3rd Edition of Solid Uaste Manual $\I 846. 3. The prices effective December 1, 1996 include a 10 X charge added to the analyses cost to maintain the normal quality assurance program. ~. CUstomer required priority laboratory saq>les coq>leted and reported within SOX of the normal time will be billed at one and one-half times the routine rate. Emergency samples IU1 inmediately or ASAP will be billed at two ti~s the rout'ioe rate. . . ~ Saq>le preparations, .if required, are charged additionally as listed. . Sample contaioe.:s', ·,*eservatives, and supplies will be provided upon request riologieal ~ling suppl ies are included in the cost of the analyses. at a reasonable charge. Bacte- /.' 7. Samples* should be del ivered to the laboratory before ~:30 p.m. on weekdays. Samples eamet be accepted on weekends or hol idays ",less special arrangements are made in advance. *(Bacteriological saq>les should be 'delivered prior to 2:00 p.m. ",less speci al arrangements are made in advance. After-hour samples may be left in cold storage vault with analyses request fo~.) 8. Billing statements for coq>leted monthly analyses are mailed by the 15th of the following month. 9. Laboratory hours are weekdays 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and weekends 8:00 a.m. to ~:oo p.m. 10. Environmental Field, Engineering Field and Pretreatment Services office hours are Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. For after-hour emergencies, leave message with computer operator. , . 11. Environmental Field and Engineering Field Services are requested to be scheduled a minillU1l of 7Z hours in advance. FOR MORE INFORMATIOtI, CONTACT: METRO: (21~) 263-2251 FAX: (21~) 262-0619 .' Uilliam 8. Cyrus Manager, Technical Services Cathy Henderson Laboratory Division Chief Cynthia Belvin Pretreatment Coordinator Jim Garrison Technical Services Engineer Kimberly Brown, Quality Assurance Coordinator . , CITY 0 F NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Right-of-Way Dedication to Tarrant County for Subject: North Tarrant Parkway ,:md I R-1 r.h~nnAI - Resolution No. 96-51 Council Meeting Date: 8/12/96 Agenda Number: PW 96-39 Tarrant County, Precinct No.3, has agreed to construct North Tarrant Parkway west of Smithfield Road to our west city limits where it will tie into the existing Wilson Lane in Keller. Also, a portion of the existing Wilson Lane for the first 900 feet off Smithfield Road will be utilized. The next 2,900 feet will be constructed by the County. Resolution No. 96-48, approved by Council on 7/22/96, amended the interlocal agreement with the City of Keller. This agreement outlines responsibilities and costs concerning the proposed box culvert and drainage improvement construction on Wilson Lane. The interlocal agreement also stipulates that the City of North Richland Hills will dedicate up to 200 feet of right-of-way from the two park properties along the south side of North Tarrant Parkway. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve Resolution No. 96-51 and authorize the Mayor to sign the two right-of-way dedication deeds. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ ~Manage' CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Directo, Page 1 of · · · RESOLUTION NO. 96-51 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The Mayor be, and is hereby authorized to execute two Right-of-Way Dedication Deeds to Tarrant County for extension of North Tarrant Parkway, copies of which are attached hereto and marked Exhibits "A" and liB". PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of August, 1996. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City · · · --- ~ OJ!! ::l ~i5 ,.. j!!~ æ So Q g I; ~ ~ ~'" ~ :::J < ø:: Q. I~ ¡: -~ = I Z !!I a fi ~, ~ í îf ~I iì jl II , ,'/':'r/ //' //J!\ \~Ø'/. <. /'~~/; I \ II ",~ ." ,1 1/1 J!,~,:, !(. I, \' rj' . ,', \ ,,;: '~-"::::::' \. -;:- ~.;~- '-~ ' "!.,- --... ~ "- '\ \ \ ~ 110 ,l,J'T"IA 1 , :' I ;' . " ' ,r \ , \ " " ,". ......... "'1 ...... ", ~ ...~' ~ ',~\ '. ~ i' . .; -""¡' , , / \ 1 ,/ '. I r, " § "-. § ~ w- § - I ~ ~ ~ '10 o , o '........- "- Exhibit A Wilson Ln. & LB Channel Parcel No. 1 KEF No. 52-309 · SPECIAL WARRANTY DEDICATION DEED DATE: GRANTOR: City of North Richland Hills GRANTORS' MAlLING ADDRESS: Mr. Greg Dickens public Works Department City of North Richland Hills Norlh Richland Hills, Tx. 76180 GRAi\ffEE: Tarrant CmU1ty, Texas GRANTEE'S MAlliNG ADDRESS: Tarrant Comlty T ransporlation Department 100 East Weatherford Fort Worth, Texas 76l9q-060l · CONSIDERATION: Ten and no/lOO dollars and other valuable consideration PROPERlY: See Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. RESERVATIONS FROM AND EXCEPTIONS TO CONVEYANCE: Grantor reserves all of the oil, gas, sulphur, and other minerals that are in and lUlder the properly herein conveyed but waive all rights of ingress and egress to the surface at all times for mining, drilling, exploring, operating, and developing the properly for oil, gas, sulphur and other minerals and for removing them from the properly. If this interest is subject to an existing lease for oil and gas or oil, gas, sulphur, or other minerals, Grantor is entitled to receive the royalties and other bene&ts that are associated with the interest and payable lUlder the lease. However, nothing in this reservation shall affect the title and rights of Tarrant COlUlty, Texas to take and use all other minerals and materials thereon, therein and thereunder. This conveyance is subject moreover, to all easements, whether of record or not; all presently recorded restrictions, reservations, covenants, conditions, and other instnunents, other than liens and conveyances, that affect the property rights of adjoining owners in any walls and fences situated on any common boundary; any discrepancies, conflicts, or shortages of area or bOlUldary lines; and encroachments or overlapping of improvements. · SPECIAL WARRAN1Y DEDICATION DEED-PAGE 1 · · · CONVEYANCE: Grantor, for the consideration and subject to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty, grants, sells, and conveys to Grantee the property, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in any wise belonging, to have and hold it to Grantee, Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns forever. Grantor binds Grantor and Grantor's heirs, executors, and administrators, and successors to warrant and forever defend all and singular the property to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof, except as to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty, when the claim is by, through, or under Grantor but not otherwise. when the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural. City of North Richland Hills By: Title (ACKNOWLEDGMENT) STATE OF TEXAS COUNlY OF TARRANT This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 19_ by , on behalf of North Richland Hills. Notary public, State of Texas AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Jeanne M. Green Transportation Dept. 100 E . Weatherford Fort Worth, Texas 76196-0601 Notary's name (printed): Notary's commission expires: SPECIAL WARRANlY DEDICATION DEED PAGE 2 · · · KEF NO. 52-309, PARCEL NO. 1 CITY OF KELLER WILSON LANE EXHIBIT "A" PERMANENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY S. RICHARDSON SURVEY A-1266 " .. SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being a strip of land on and across a tract of land in the S. Richardson Survey Abstract No. 1266 said tract of land being that same tract of land conveyed to the City of North Richland Hills (first city tract) by deed as recorded in Volume 10848, Page 1525 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, (D.R.T.C.T.) said strip being herein described as a variable width Permanent Street Right-of-Way as shown on the attached Exhibit B and being more particu- larly described by metes and bounds as follows: ~ BEGINNING at a one inch iron rod set in concrete at the northeast corner of said first city tract in the existing south right-of-Way line of Wilson Lane said point of beginning being in the east line of a tract of land conveyed to the City of ~orth Richland Hills (second city tract) by deed as recorded in Volume 11699, Page 219 of the D.R.T.C.T.; THENCE, South 00 degrees 35 minutes 32 seconds East, along the westerly property line of the said second city tract and the easterly property line of said first city tract, 202.52 feet to a point; THENCE, Norfh 89 degrees 26 minutes 25 seconds West, 1,683.34 feet to a point in the westerly property line of said first city tract; . THENCE, North 00 degrees 23 minutes 16 seconds West, along the westerly property line of said first city tract, 200.11' feet to the northwest property corner of said first city tract; THE~CE, South 89 degrees 31 minutes 11 seconds East, 1,682.58 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. \ The Permanent Street Right-of-Way herein described contains 1.1118 acres '(338,802.2 square feet) of land, more or less. TO ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN TITLE TO THE PREMISES SURVEYED, I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND FROM AN ACTUAL AND ACCURATE SURVEY UPON THE GROUND AND THAT SAME IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Company Name: Eddie L. Dunn R.P.L.S. Inc. , By: U~ ÿ'CP-- Eddie L. Dunn - , Registered Professional Land Surveyor, Texas No. 4580 EXHIBIT B .' , DRAWING OF EXHIBIT . A· CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS VOL. 11699, PG. 219 D.R.T.C.T. · '. z I~ POINT OF BEGINNING 0 (/ -.J 0 FOR EXHIBIT "A" §: I~ a: 0::> .1 010 ~I I ~ N NO::> ~(O U'" êD' I~ NI * ~I J ~ ,... I: 0 200' 400' I ~ I I~ , I GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET I~ 1 " 200' - I~ I 5 I Ii I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I~ I VOL. 10848, PG. 1525 D.R.T.C.T. I: I I ,! I I I S. RICHARDSON SURVEY I A-1266 '. 1:<: I · EXHIBIT "A" I I I( I PROPOSED VARIABLE 'MOTH !!: PERMANENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY -- 1 7.7778 ACRES (338.802.2 SQ, FT.) I W . I JOHN W. WILSON .- VOl. 381~, PG. 127 ... D.R. T.C. T. f) ~I ""!, en n 0::> '~I en I N.00·23'16NW. ~ KELLER PHASE I, L TO. ~ - ~ VOL. 11415, PG. 879 u 0 a: 0 ~ if! cL S a: D.R. T.C. T. Ie Ie cL I'! ;:r¡ $W I'! ;:r¡ z ê d :5 ê d EDDIE L. DUNN a.. a.. 0( vi Z ~ vi REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL 0 Ñ 0 Ñ õ 0 ëi I (/ I LAND SURVEYOR ... ~ 0 ~ -.J 0 :¡:; :f :¡:; ó ~ ó ~ JOB NO. :7-96-62 a: a: DATE: 7-2-96 COGO FILE: 3 96 62 · ACAD FILE: 'MLSONA DRAWN BY: E.LD. COMPUTED BY: E.LC 7083 BAKER BL. YO. CHECKED BY: E.L.D. RICHLAND TEXAS (817) 284-5539 76118 Exhibit B Wilson Ln. & LB Channel Parcel No. 2 KEF No. 52-309 · SPECIAL WARRANTY DEDICATION DEED DATE: GRANTOR: City of North Richland HJls GRANTORS' MAILING ADDRESS: Mr. Greg Dickens public Works Department City of North Richland HJls North Richland Hills, Tx. 76180 GRANTEE: Tarrant County, Texas GRANTEE'S MAIUNG ADDRESS: Tarrant County Transportation Department 100 East Weatherford Fort Worth, Texas 76196-0601 · CONSIDERATION: Ten and no/l 00 dollars and other valuable consideration PROPERlY: See Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. RESERVATIONS FROM AND EXCEPTIONS TO CONVEYANCE: Grantor reserves all of the oil, gas, sulphur, and other minerals that are in and under the properly herein conveyed but waive all rights of ingress and egress to the surface at all times for mining, drilling, exploring, operating, and developing the properly for oJ, gas, sulphur and other minerals and for removing them from the properly. If this interest is subject to an existing lease for oJ and gas or oil, gas, sulphur, or other minerals, Grantor is entitled to receive the royalties and other benefits that are associated with the interest and payable under the lease. However, nothing in this reservation shall affect the title and rights of Tarrant County, Texas to take and use all other minerals and materials thereon, therein and thereunder. This conveyance is subject moreover, to all easements, whether of record or not; all presently recorded restrictions, reservations, covenants, conditions, and other instruments, other than liens and conveyances, that affect the properly rights of adjoining owners in any walls and fences situated on any common boundary; any discrepancies, conflicts, or shortages of area or boundary lines; and encroachments or overlapping of improvements. · SPECIAL WARRANlY DEDICATION DEED-PAGE 1 · · · CONVEYANCE: Grantor, for the consideration and subject to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty, grants, sells, and conveys to Grantee the property, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in any wise belonging, to have and hold it to Grantee, Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns forever. Grantor binds Grantor and Grantor's heirs, executors, and administrators, and successors to warrant and forever defend all and singular the property to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof, except as to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty, when the claim is by, through, or Wlder Grantor but not otherwise. when the context requires, singular noWlS and pronoWls include the plural. City of N ooh Richland Hills By: Title (ACKNOWLEDGMENT) STATE OF TEXAS COUNIY OF TARRANT This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 19_ by , on behalf of North Richland Hills. Notary Public, State of Texas AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Jeanne M. Green Transportation Dept. 100 E. Weatherlord Fort Worth, Texas 76196-0601 Notary's name (printed): Notary's commission expires: SPECIAL WARRANlY DEDICATION DEED PAGE 2 · KEF NO, 52-309, PARCEL NO. 2 CITY OF KELLER WI LSON LANE EXHIBIT "A" PERMANENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY S. RICHARDSON SURVEY A-1266 SITUATED in the City of North RichJand HiJJs, Tarrant County, T~as and being a strip of Jand on and across a tract of Jand in the S. Richardson Survey Abstract No. 1266 said tract of Jand being that same tract of land conveyed to the City of North RichJand HiJJs (first city tract) as recorded in VoJume 11699, Page 219 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, (D.R.T.C.T.) said strip being herein described as a variabJe width Permanent Street Right- of-Way as shown on the attached Exhibit B and being more particuJarJy de- scribed by metes and bounds as foJJows: BEGINNING at a one haJf inch iron rod found in pJace at the northwest corner of said first city tract, in existing WiJson Lane said iron rod being North 00 degrees 45 minutes 47 seconds West, 26.72 feet from a one inch iron rod in concrete at the northeast corner of a tract of Jand conveyed to the City of North RicnJand HiJJs (second city tract) by deed as recorded in VoJume 10848, Page 1525 of the D.R.T.C.T.; · THENCE, North 89 degrees 33 minutes 11 seconds East, along the north property line of the said first city tract, 2,008.34 feet to a point at the northeast corner of said first city tract, said point being in the westerly property line of a tract of Jand conveyed to Tarrant County by deed as recorded in VoJume 9625, Page 902 of the D.R.T.C.T.; THENCE, South 00 degrees. 01 minutes 19 seconds West, along the east property Jine of said first city tract and the west property line of said Tarrant County tract, at 36.65 feet passing a one half inch iron rod continuing in aJJ 200.04 feet to a point; THENCE, South 89 degrees 33 minutes 34 seconds West, 1,388.79 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the left whose center bears South 00 degrees 26 minutes ~6 seconds East, 1,840.00 feet; THENCE, westerly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 5 degrees 56 minutes 02 seconds and an arc length of 190.56 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE, South 83 degrees 37 .inutes 32 seconds West, 100.16 feet to a pOint at the beginning of a curve to the right whose center bears North 6 degrees 22 minutes 28 seconds West, 2,040.0 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE, westerly along said curve to the right through a central angle of 6 degrees 56 minutes 03 seconds and an arc length of 246.88 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE, North 89 degrees 26 minùtes 25 seconds West, 80.55 feet to a point in the west property line of said first city tract and the east property line of said second city tract; North 00 degrees 45 minutes 47 seconds West, along the west property line of said first city tract and the east property line of said second city tract, at 202.52 passing the northeast property corner of said second city tract, in all 229.24 feet; to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The Permanent Street Right-of-Way herein described contains 9.4745 acres (412,708.5 square feet) of land, more or less. TO ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN TITLE TO THE PREMISES SURVEYED, I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND FROM AN ACTUAL AND ACCURATE SURVEY UPON THE GROUND AND THAT SAME IS TRUE AND CORRECT. THENCE, · Company Name: Eddie L. Dunn R.P.L.S. Inc. By: ~ Z S./Þ- Eddie L. Dunn Registered Professional Land Surveyor, Tex~s ~o. 4~&D E~HISIT' "s" DRA'MNC Of' EXHIBIT "A· · · C) Z Z_ Z- -« C)= WI- m_ m LL.- O:r: X I-W Z~ 00 Q..LL. J .65 TARRANT COUNTY VOL. 9625. PC. 902 D.R. T.C. T. IR S.00·01'19"W. ~ .200.04' eci o o N ... j~ ÕO ~ :E C/< z , ¡:: en ~ ... LJ . -- -- h !"> 0> CO Z · N ... cD N UJ ~I J ~ I o 200' 400' ~ I GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1" - 200' ~ CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS VOL. 11699, PG. 219 D.R.T.C.T. S. RICHARDSON SURVEY A-1266 EXHIBIT II A" " PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH PERMANENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY 9.4745 ACRES (412,708.5 SQ. FT.) "en f"- eci CO I") -- ! IL S.00"26'26"E. RADIAL UNE <> ã CURVE DATA R = 1,840.00 L = 190.56' t:. =' 5'56'02" S.83·37'32"W. 100.16' R"OI"L LINE N.06"22'2B"W. 229.24' IR 202.52' CURVE DATA R - 2,040.00 L ... 246.88' t:. ... 6'56'03" ''2.....'tI. 9''26 ~ ~~.ßßO.~5 N.00·4547 W. CITY Of' NORTH RICHLAND HILLS VOL. 10848. PC. 1525 O.R.T.C.T. · · · ,. EDDIE 1. DUNN REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ..'. . JOB NO,: 7-96-62 DATE: 7-2-96 COGO FILE: 3 96 6: ACAD FILE: WILSON DRA WN BY: E.~p. COMPUTED BY: E.LI 7083 BAKER BLVD. C'-""ÉD BY'.' E.LD RICHLAND TEXAS m:.\;,,, 76118 (817) 28~-5S39 · ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Set Date for Public Hearing on Land Use Subject: Assumptions Plan for Revision of Impact Fees for Water and Wastewater Improvements - Resolution No. 96-52 Council Meeting Date: 8/12/96 Agenda Number: PW 96~O In accordance with the Settlement Agreement with the City of Watauga, the City of North Richland Hills is proceeding with a total review and revision of the impact fee program. Section 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the first step in this procedure is to hold a public hearing on the Land Use Assumptions Plan. The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee is having a work session on August 19, 1996 with interested local developers to discuss the Land Use Assumptions Plan. A copy of the Plan with an additional map showing developed and undeveloped areas is enclosed. Based on the publication and notice requirements of Section 395, the public hearing may be held on September 23, 1996. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve Resolution No. 96-52, calling the public hearing and consideration of the revised Land Use Assumptions Plan. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Oper in Budget_ Oth Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Availab Finance Director gnature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of , . . . . RESOLUTION NO. 96-52 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. A Public Hearing shall be held by the North Richland Hills City Council on the consideration of adoption of a revised Land Use Assumptions Plan for use in revising the City's water and wastewater impact fees. Such hearing shall be heard at 7:30 p.m. o'clock on the 23rd day of September, 1996, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7301 N. E. Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas. 2. Notice shall be given of the public hearing as prescribed by Section 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of August, 1996. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City ..' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Award of Bid on Rumfield Road, Phase I Subject: Curb & Gutter, Sidewalks and nrainage Improvement~ Agenda Number: 8/12/96 PW 9S-~1 Bids were received for this project on July 29, 1996 and the low bidders are shown below: Bidder Amount Calendar Days Bid Time Walt Williams Construction Humphrey & Morton Larry H. Jackson Construction, Inc. $210,850.24 $219,914.92 $229,020.80 260 230 311 The City and County will be constructing Rumfield Road, Phase I in accordance to the Interlocal Agreement approved by City Council on July 22, 1996 (PW 96-37). The agreement stipulates that the County will provide the labor and equipment for most of the paving work and the City will pay for the curb and gutter, sidewalks, drainage and paving materials. Below is a preliminary schedule for the project: Clear right-of-way (County) Award bid on curb & gutter and drainage Preconstruction meeting Begin construction End construction July 30, 1996 August 12, 1996 August 22, 1996 September 2, 1996 May 22, 1997 Funding Source: The 1995/96 Capital Projects Budget includes funds for the paving and drainage improvements for Rumfield Road, Phase I. Currently $555,500 has been budgeted for construction of the entire project. Below is a breakdown of the estimated cost for each section of the total project. Section Engineer's Cost Estimate Amount Bid Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk & Drainage Paving work by City/County $277,439.10 136.284.30 $413,723.40 $210,850.24 136.284.30 * $347,134.54 *This will be the actual cost of materials. The amount shown is the estimated cost. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council award the bid to Walt Williams Construction in the amount of $210,850.24 for a period of 260 calendar days. Finance Review n Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 20-02-05-6000 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating udget Other Finance D..a( ( City Manager Page 1 of . . J~~' c=:i ,,--- -::---:( :¡ ,/.fJ: Ii \; ,~ Ii ii ¡¡ ....'......,.....................~ ~ ~~~--:_-,,\:: :i :: II I :¡ ~._. ,:1-~~~::~ :: II n :¡ ;: ... /.~~,. :' I' II II II 'I \1 '-""""-'-<-...' ~' V " :::::::::: " ............ 1'.1-~ :: r~___ \____II____ I____t\ :: ~~/ (I ~----------------"'J " 1/ II~: I, ,~:/:: II ,~/f \'::.:------- :-.:::::J::J>':':':':':'i! j' :: If~~1 ,I ~I · L' ~~ : ! :;:.::-:.; ~ " II 'I iI ,I ':' . I' ---): q !: ---): I~r=="==:: ¡;:: I' ;>",~: r= I: 1 __:::;:=:::..1.... 1\ ,I i~=======-- \\ ,l' ~ ;: I, '.c==~\ ,.~... . .1 :: " ~/ :: :':':~I ,..._===1: ,}~ ,I :: ......- :~~~' ,;-----7,== :: I' 1,- ~~~: :: I~___ t::1 :: ==;~====~: ~~ ': :: ~--_. > I I' 'I...'Í II ~ :s :i )t :r-:-:-:: :,===~: ",..._-_u_-_-_-_-__-_-.:__~__-.:_,~ _-'4...1 ...J I, II II ,I ,Jf' ICIR.IC.RD. II', --!!~: :. " II II ~.r ~ ~ I I II :: I: tI " _ ~ Jr-----------";~~-==:=.:::.:!: :: II I' ~ ~ -~~, ,,- ,):,:::: i ~ "II I: /~I ~:I,: ~~-___-jl....--....r=.r....c'...._...............I.....:r.:1 ~ ~ :1 ~...~' c::.== =r,' :1 ...1-'" -I,' VTD"RD. ~ ~ ;1 - :-;------r===="~....-'; ~ ~ ~ Rumfield Road - Prase I æ ~.: :' II t"¡ ~.. " " . " q ~ ~-::-=;;~n--n"'ã: R~a;;.·==uu==..!.......--......~ ,__:: Y ~ ~ II If II ......-:: :,:, :' '::::~: ." I' I, 11 ,f' 2! 'I ~ I ;:=:==::=::':~r--' :: It r " 'I ,...-__1, I, '1 It ! ____I, ----" I, ., "ØIC ~ ---'1 ~I" /, II r?-":.·:,:-:,::,,:; Q 't " I, I... I' II II \\ ~I ~ ___J: ,~:.-:.~'1... ,~I /,~ ,....__..., :: :'.... \\ < .. ---"'11 II ...~.:" "'1---'" II ,: I-.:..~\ 0 ~ :: ...___:: ...'"'......~...,;~,ì I, :i-"'---~":.--~·:1: \~\ ~ " :.:.::.11 \...--,: II:: I, ('\--:===::.:=- ëia ~ :: :~==;..-:: __J~-_~ ~ --- c.. ~ ......_ :: :: -..::.=-..:.::--- @:~ ,. ,_¡ U) (';... ;: :~-...--........-... ~:: ~-, ~r\ ~,' -~/ :: II 'I ------"':..~__-_-___-......' I, II II " It ,..., II "" ... ,., I.._H___I::::~-_-_-_-_::__,,- " " , 01------ I, ........ '\ I' I ------_IL . I: II '~\ ...... :;...:: I/I:"------...,.,r--.:=~:,-----":,:~::.:::" ¡I,..==::==::===l~-_-..."'I ,.......~......';:' __.._ -_ - I , ......-:::.Z:...----:r-:~ ,.:/" :1, :', :: '....."';.'......,... " "I' , ,- ...::""':Q""'. '~, II II ,:' 'Ii:: ~~-:..--~--~, ,I:=:=::.~=;=:=,", ""?;.:<:rO",, " 'I :' :::l.__-_-:!, ~ :: ::... ......:...~ \~, ...':.':.-:.':"~: $' ,,------ "'. ,:jit'i'''...( '~'" '~\ ,': " ------)~é..................---:f--- :: (')~' ....,"; \ \\ HI' ------ \\ II '," 'I. \1 II ,... It " \\ 'I "",..." \~\ \\ I' :: ': II .... _\\ \\ :' ,::,....~'\ ~~ II :: II ::: ~~,':..:: _~~:~~~~~~¡t, ;\ j;~~:=;=='~-----){"""'~~~~~~i~~==:==; ¡,,:: -----1~----- ,:~:'" \:.:z±; tu, ... :: t'" ~\ ,;.:",~ r: IÞ,_-I \/ II I' " - t ~ II 'I ~';.':::.'2.::=~===~: ''''''':Q-cr- t.~ ~ ~ ~ :1 I :1 ,,- ~ ~ ~ ~ I ------------------': r""'.- ~o ~_............ 1 ~ ~ ; ------'r---.---,-----I,,,,:... .. ~ II :: :: :: )~ ,~,N . '" ;, ..___.. It: " II ~\,' ....... ~ t:1, ~"--"I"'~, ~ \ 1\ \\ \\...~~' ~~II ,,' ,I (I :";'" ~ ft : 'I, '::_::J' ,~~-;1 ~_______::.:'.:-," ~ \', _;,: j): : ';, ,:" ~~.... I \\ ~ '~:' ~~________ :::.::.~ ",~;' 1-¿~;\ ;\ ~ ~ If --------.', ------:..--------" ..,~10" l~----":.--~~---- '~\:: ~ ::_ :~:: ,. ,~... 1~ \~\ ,( ~ ,';-___-:..________-_-:===} :: ,.. ~~{.ì"'.......--------... \\--:.~"';._;._:._:.":..::~ \\::.-:~ I: f) /' I, ~ , - ------ , 1\- II II :' .: ,_,__-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-~ ~:':.: .....~~ ':' - :' ,\ II ,"', :;.:==-...::--~ ,I .~~-:., /~----'":..-----------~~: \~~r------'::~ tì 1: ~; \I _J,' ~I, I ! . Rumfield Road Street Improvements Phase I N w E s Project Location April 10, 1996 . KNOWLTON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 31, 1996 Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N .E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-381, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RUMFIELD ROAD, PHASE I, CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TABULA TION OF BIDS . Bids were received on July 29, 1996, for the referenced project, and proposals were submitted from five (5) general contractors. A detailed bid tabulation is attached. The following is a summary of the bids for each Contractor by section, including a comparison of the low bid by Walt Williams with the Engineer's Estimate dated June 18, 1996: ~... CONTRACTOR DAYS MISC. DRAINAGE TOTAL BID PAVING 1. Walt Williams Construction 260 $44,032.24 $166,818.00 $210,850.24 2. Hum re & Morton 230 52,413.92 167,501 .00 219,914.92 3. La H. Jackson Construction 150· 59,857.80 169,163.00 229,020.80 4. Orval Hall Excavatin 250 50,395.76 196,857.00 247,252.76 5. Thomco Construction 304 59,088.10 190,326.82 249,414.92 En ineer's Estimate .. 77,509.10 199,930.00 217 ,439.10 Low Bid Under Estim. $33,476.86 $33,112.00 $66,588.86 . · Bidders were instructed to include in their bid times an allowance for the extra time required for the County to do their part of the paving work. The assumed time for the County work, as noted in the Contract Documents is 23 weeks (161 Calendar Days). It appears that Larry Jackson's bid time should have been 161 + 150 = 311 Calendar Days (assuming no concurrent world. .. Engineer's Estimate of Construction Cost, June 18, 1996, based on Design Quantities and Recent Unit Prices of Construction for Similar C.I.P. Projects in North Richland Hills. Please note that the cost of paving materials to be paid by NRH for the County's work is not included in this estimate. 1901 CENTRAL DR.. SUITE 550. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO 8171267·3367. FAX 817/354-4389 . . . Page 2 July 31, 1996 Rumfield Road, Phase I, Curb & Gutter, Sidewalks and Drainage Improvements Bid Tabulations and Recommendation of Contract A ward This project includes the following general work: 1. Pavin& - 10" Thick, 49-foot BIB asphalt pavement from Spring Oaks Drive to Precinct Line Road (by County). Also included is a 4-foot wide sidewalk along the north side of the roadway, concrete curb & gutter, concrete valley gutters at Spring Oaks and Precinct Line, plus traffic buttons and hydromulch (by Private éontractor) . 2. Draina&e -- This includes a 3-barrel, lO'x9' box culvert, concrete riprap and gabions in the vicinity of the culvert, plus underground storm drain and inlet construction in Rumfield Road (by Private Contractor). The County will provide the labor and equipment for most of the paving work and the City will pay for the paving materials. The private contractor will construct the concrete flatwork and drainage improvements. The total project is estimated to take 260 calendar days. If the County begins its clearing work on August 5, 1996, then the estimated project completion date would be about April 21, 1997. The following is a general sequence of activities associated with this project along with estimates of time required to perform each operation for the low bidder, Walt Williams Construction Company: 1. County - Clear right-of-way (estimate 2 weeks) 2. Contractor - Construct box culvert (estimate 5 weeks) 3. County - Construct roadway embankment and street excavation (estimate 10 weeks) 4. Contractor - Construct storm drain, concrete channel liner , and gabions (estimate 2 weeks) 5. County - Lime stabilize subgrade and construct first four (4) inches of asphalt pavement base course (estimate 6 weeks) 6. Contractor - Construct curb and gutter on asphalt base (estimate 2 weeks) 7. County - Backfill behind curbs, construct remaining four (4) inches of asphalt base course and final two (2) inch surface course after curb & gutter is complete (estimate 5 weeks) . . . Page 3 July 37, 7996 Rumfield Road, Phase I, Curb & Gutter, Sidewalks and Drainage Improvements Bid Tabulations and Recommendation of Contract A ward 8. Contractor - Construct sidewalk, hydromulch embankment, slopes and parkways, install traffic buttons, etc. (estimate 5 weeks) The total estimated time to complete the project, including both the County and Contractor's projected time is about 37 weeks or 260 calendar days. The low bid by Walt Williams in the amount of $210,850.24, is $66,588.86 under the recent engineer's construction cost estimate of $277,439.10. We estimate that an additional $70,000 to $100,000 should also be budgeted as required to reimburse the County for pavement material costs associated with this project. The low bidder, Walt Williams Construction, Inc., has completed several concrete projects, primarily as sub-contractor, in the metroplex area, including the concrete work on Jerrell Street, concrete work on Central Drive in Bedford, concrete pavement work on Michael Blvd. in Hurst, etc. We understand that the contractor has performed well on all of these projects. Based on the bids received, and in the absence of any negative reports concerning the low bidder, we would recommend contract award to Walt Williams Construction, Inc., P.O. Box 4620, Fort Worth, Texas 76164, in the total amount of $210,850.24, for a period of 260 Calendar Days. We will be available at the August 12, 1996, meeting to assist you with answers to any questions which the City Council may have concerning this project. w.~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RW A/ra/Enclosures/Bida.381 xc: Mr. C.A. Sanford, City Manager Mr. Randy Shiflet, Assistant City Manager Mr. Larry Cunningham, Assistant City Manager Mr. Patrick J. Elfrink, Director of Finance > Mr. Mike Curtis, P.E., Capital Improvements Coordinator Mr. Jimmy Cates, Public Works Superintendent/Streets Mr. Mark Bradley, R.O.W. Agent CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Approve Clty-ueveloper Agreement Concerning Subject: Hightower Drive Paving Participation. Eden Addition, Fourth Filing Agenda Number: 8/12/96 PW 96-112 Council Meeting Date: The developer, Steve and Vicki Weinberg (d.b.a. Montclair Park, Inc.), have requested the City participate in the cost of the extra width of Hightower Drive pavement greater than one-half of a 37 -foot street. This is in accordance with the City's current policy per our Subdivision Ordinance No. 1982, Section 345. The estimate of City participation based on Austin Bridge & Road bid prices seems reasonable at $37,697.72. It includes $10,437.16 for overlaying the existing north side of Hightower Drive adjacent to this section. This will help extend the life of the north half of Hightower Drive. Funding Source: Sufficient funds of $37,697.72 are available in the Unspecified Street Fund. Recommendation: It is recommended the Council approve the City-Developer Agreement with Steve and Vicki Weinberg concerning Hightower Drive Paving Improvements, which calls for City participation of $37,697.72 in the paving improvements upon their completion and acceptance, authorize the Mayor to sign the City-Developer Agreement, and appropriate $37,697.72 from the Unspecified Street Fund. Finance Review Acct. Number _ 13-?3-29-6000 SUffi\) Funds Availab FInance Dndo< nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 01 · ·3. 6. CITY-DEVELOPER AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS, Steve and Vicki Weinberg, d.b.a. Montclair Park, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, a municipal corporation operating under a Home Rule Charter, hereinafter referred to as "City" desire to enter into a contract for pavement improvements along a segment of Hightower Drive. In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and for the purpose of providing pavement improvements for Hightower Drive, as indicated in the construction plans titled "EDEN ADDITION, FOURTH FILING" the Developer and the City hereto agree: 1. The Developer will pay to the City all necessary processing fees and will furnish all necessary permits, as required from the construction of the above referenced facilities. In addition, the Developer has delivered construction plans, and will deliver all other necessary contract documents prepared by a registered professional engineer, and will also furnish construction surveying, cut sheets and field adjustments. 2. The Developer will enter into a contract with the Contractor who will perform the 'NOrk and who will be paid by the Developer as specified in the construction contract documents. Monthly pay estimates concerning Hightower Drive shall be subject to the City's review. The Developer agrees to provide, at no cost to the City, all testing necessary to insure that the construction is in accordance with the project specifications and the City standards. 4. The Developer understands and agrees that he has no authority to cancel, alter or amend the terms of the construction contract with reference to Hightower Drive without specific written authority of the City, and that he shall be responsible for paying the costs of any cancellations, additions, alterations, or amendments to the contract unless specifically provided otherwise by written authorization from the City. 5. The Contractor will provide to the City on City forms a maintenance bond in the amount of twenty (20%) percent of the contract price less the City's participation of the costs. It is herein expressly written that the Developer shall require the Contractor to maintain all improvements regardless of the face value of the bond. The City agrees to participate in the cost of the facilities after construction is complete and accepted. The description and amount of participation is as follows: In accordance with Section 345 of Ordinance No. 1982, Subdivision Regulations, and as previously discussed with City Council on 3/25/96, agenda item PS 96-06, the City will reimburse the Developer the eligible amount for street improvements on Hightower Drive. The City shall only reimburse the . Developer the amount agreed upon below, after the construction of the improvements is complete and accepted by the City. Page 10'4 Eden4.agr . CITY PARTICIPATION OFFSITE '" i ... »ITEM< · ... CITY QUANTITY CITY PARTICIPATION DEVELOPER COST 4" Type "S" HMAC (Subbase) 617 SY $ 4,996.85 $0.00 4" Type "S" HMAC (Sase) 543 SY 3,991.05 0.00 2" Type "0" HMAC 543 SY 2,139.42 0.00 10" Stabilized Subgrade 617 SY 1,234.00 0.00 LIME (50 #/SY) 16 TN 1,168.00 0.00 4" Sidewalk 210 LF 1,921.50 0.00 Driveway Approach 170 SF 666.40 0.00 Curb & Gutter 222 LF 2,919.30 0.00 . - -... ,..., .. ...... .....--. ,...--.....,.- - ".-... '.... . Subtotal Offsite ..... .... $19,006.52 . $0.00 EDEN ADDITION (OVER-SIZING) ..... 'pi' '. . ... .... .. ')ITEM CITY QUANTITY . CITY PARTICIPATION DEVELOPER COST 4" Type "S" HMAC (Subbase) 356 SY $2,865.80 $ 9,064.30 4" Type "S" HMAC (Sase) 356 SY 2,616.60 6,967.80 2" Type "D· HMAC 356 SY 1,402.64 3,735.12 10" Stabilized Subgrade 356 SY 712.00 2,252.00 LIME (50 #/SY) 9TN 657.00 2,044.00 4" Sidewalk o LF 0.00 3,929.93 Curb Ramps OEA 0.00 1,080.00 Curb & Gutter o LF 0.00 6,016.13 Subtotal Over-Sizing ,"' $8,254.04 $35,089.28 OVERLAY .. ITEM CITY QUANTITY CITY PARTICIPATION DEVELOPER COST Wedge Milling 456 LF $ 4,860.96 $0.00 2" Type "0" HMAC 1138 SY 5,576.20 0.00 SubtotalOverfay .......... $10,437.16 $0.00 . . . TOTAL MAXIMUM REIMBURSEMENT $37)697.72 Page 2 of 4 Eden4.agr . 7. The City will inspect the work as required and upon satisfactory completion of the work, the City will accept ownership and maintenance of the street subject to the terms of the maintenance bond. 8. The Developer further covenants and agrees to, and by these presents does hereby, fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents and employees from all suits, actions, or claims of any character, whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages sustained by any persons (including death), or to any property, resulting from or in connection with the construction, design, performance, or completion or any work to be performed by said Developer, his contractor, subcontractors, officers, agents, or employees, or in consequence of any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of said Developer, his contractor, subcontractors, officer, agents, or employees, whether or not such injuries, death or damages are caused, in whole or in part, by the alleged negligence of the City of North Richland Hills, its officers, agents, servants, employees, contractors, or subcontractors. 9. Upon completion of the work, good and sufficient title to all facilities constructed warranted free of any liens or encumbrances is hereby vested in the City of North Richland Hills. 10. Special provisions: None . . Page 3 of 4 Eden4,agr . Executed this the 1 day of {lµ J . 1996. By:~~(;J~ .c'Steve Weinberg By: ({)ICJA: á í1£~b¡ Vicki Weinberg STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT I '7-6 This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the..../..- day of 1996 b Steve and Vicki Weinberg, d.b.a. Montclair Park, Inc. ~j@~ T.G. HUSSEY ~ Notary Public * .~. * STATE OF TEXAS ~ ~ ?t ~ My Conwn. Exp. 06/10/98 .ommission Expires: a~ {/ ~)DÆf? . " Notary's Printed Name: -T. G, f4t;5~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: ATTEST: Mayor, Tommy Brown City Secretary, Patricia Hutson Rex . Page 4 of4 Eden4.agr , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Approval of Proposal for Water and Wastewater Subject: Impact Fee Amendment Study Agenda Number: 8/12/96 PW 96-43 Council Meeting Date: In accordance with the Settlement Agreement with the City of Watauga, both cities are jointly utilizing Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. (KEF) to conduct a total review of the impact fee program. Two separate studies will be conducted; one for Watauga's newly acquired systems and one for our remaining systems. The cost is to be split 50/50 by the cities regardless of which portion of the study is more expensive. KEF will provide the following services for a cost not to exceed $102,500. · Manage the overall project including assurance that all project milestone deadlines are established and adhered to; · Outline developed and undeveloped areas in GIS; · Enter revised land use assumptions for NRH and Watauga into GIS; · Enter all revisions or additions to the water and wastewater system's future improvements into GIS; · Gather data to be entered, analyze data, make required calculations; · Calculate the reconciled Impact Fees based upon actual CIP expenditures and actual Living Unit Equivalent growth over the last 6 years; · Attend all work sessions of the staff and engineers as well as public meetings of the City Council, Impact Fee Advisory Committee, and Public Hearings required relating to the fees through the duration of the project; · Assure that all statutory requirements of Section 395 of the Texas Local Government Code are followed; · Present findings in report form to the North Richland Hills City Council and Watauga City Council. All consultant costs should be paid for out of the existing impact fee funds. This is a legal and appropriate use. Finance Review nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 02-90-08-6000 Finance Director anager Page 1 of · · · Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available in the Water and Sewer Impact Fee Fund to pay the NRH share of $51,250. Current cash balance is $456,500. This fund is used to pay for the portion of Capital Improvement Projects which have been determined to serve future development and consultant charges for impact fee studies and related items. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve the proposal from Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. · . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 6, 1996 Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-434, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEE AMENDMENT STUDY ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT This is to confirm that Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc., Consulting Engineers, (Engineer) is authorized to proceed with preparation of a "Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Amendment" study which will provide the basis for implementing a new Impact Fee Rate structure for the City of Watauga, and will help determine if revisions to the current North Richland Hills (Owner) Impact Fee Rates will be required after system separation. · A detailed list of the project work tasks included in this assignment, along with estimated engineering services costs, is presented under separate cover in Exhibit" A ", with estimated completion times for each task. A proposed calendar of activities associated with the Impact Fee Implementation Plan for the City of Watauga is included in Exhibit "B", and the proposed North RichlandHills Impact Fee Amendment schedule calendar is included in Exhibit "C". A summary table of key North Richland Hills scheduled meetings and other dates is attached. The Watauga study is scheduled for completion on September 30, 1996, at which time the new impact fees are to be set by the Watauga City Council. The North Richland Hills Impact Fee Amendment study is scheduled for completion on November 11, 1996. Knowlton-English- Flowers, Inc., proposes to prepare this study in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section II.D of the "Agreement for Engineering Services" Contract dated June 13, 1977; and compensation to the Engineer shall be in accordance with Section VI. D. Total compensation to the Engineer shall not exceed $102,500, without further authorization. We understand that the Cities of North Richland Hills and Watauga have agreed to each pay 1/2 of the total study cost. Therefore, the proposed engineering fee allocation would be $51,250 for each City. · We appreciate this opportunity to be of continued service to both the Cities of North Richland Hills and Watauga. We are available to answer any questions which you may have concerning ~t(I.~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E., Vice President 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO 817/267-3367. FAX 817/354-4389 · · · Page 2 August 6, 1996 3-434, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE AMENDMENT STUDY ENGINEERING SERVICES AUTHORIZATION RWA/ra/Auth.434 xc: Mr. C.A. Sanford, North Richland Hills City Manager Mr. Randy Shiflet, Assistant NRH City Manager Mr. Larry Cunningham, Assistant NRH City Manager Mr. Patrick J. Elfrink, NRH Director of Finance Mr. Mike Curtis, P.E., NRH Capital Projects Coordinator Mr. Barry LeBaron, Community Development Director Mr. Lee Maness, Watauga City Manager CITY OF NORTH RICH lAND HILLS PROPOSED WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE AMENDMENT SCHEDULE ITEM DATE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION DONE 1. 7/18/96 Develop Preliminary land Use Assumption Plan Map for the Service Area X (NRH City Limits) - 395.0455 2. 7/25/96 Present Preliminary land Use Assumption Plan Map and Report to Capital X Improvements Advisory Committee (C.I.A.C.) 3. 8/02/96 Meeting with Staff and Consultants to Set Impact Fee Amendment Schedule X 4. 8/12/96 City to adopt an order, ordinance or resolution establishing a Public Hearing Date (9/23/96) to consider land Use Assumptions within Service Area (NRH) - 395.042 5. 8/13/96 Submit Agenda for C.I.A.C. Workshop to Discuss land Use Assumptions Map with Principal Developers in NRH 6. 8/15/96 Mail Agenda for land Use Assumptions Workshop to C.I.A.C. and Others 7. 8/19/96 Make Land Use Assumptions Plan available to public and publish Land Use Plan Public Hearing notice (1 st Publication). Notices shall be for 3 consecutive weeks over 30 days and less than 60 days prior to Public hearing date - 395.043 and 395.044 8. 8/19/96 C.I.A,C. Workshop with Developers to Discuss Land Use Assumptions Plan (7:00 pm) 9. 8/26/96 2nd Publication of Notice for land Use Assumptions Public Hearing 10. 9/02/96 3rd Publication of Notice for land Use Assumptions Public Hearing 11. 9/16/96 Submit copies of land Use Assumption Maps and Report to City for Mailing to Council 12. 9/23/96 Hold Land Use Assumptions Amendment Plan Public Hearing during Council Meeting 13. 9/23/96 Council Adopt Ordinance Approving Land Use Assumptions Amendment Plan (this shall be done less than 30 days after Public Hearing, or same day - 395.045) 14. 9/23/96 City to adopt an order, ordinance or resolution establishing a Public Hearing Date (11/11/96) to consider adoption of Capital Improvements Plan and imposition of Impact Fee - 395.047 15. 10/04/96 Consultant submit preliminary Capital Improvements Amendment Plan to City for Review prior to Publication 16. 10/11/96 Make Capital Improvements Amendment Plan available to the public and publish C.I.P. Public Hearing notice (1 st Publication). Notices shall be for 3 consecutive weeks over 30 days and less than 60 days prior to Public Hearing Date. - 395.048 and 395.049 17. 10/18/96 2nd Publication of Notice for C.I.P. Amendment Public Hearing 18. 10/25/96 3rd Publication of Notice for C.I.P. Amendment Public Hearing . 19. 11/01/96 Receive comments from C.I.A.C. on C.I.P. Amendment Plan (should be 6 days or more prior to Public Hearing - 395.050) 20. 11/11/96 Hold Capital Improvements Amendment Plan Public Hearing 2" 11/11/96 Approve and adopt Capital Improvements Amendment Plan and Impose Impact Fee Amendments - 395.051 , ,