The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1996-08-26 Agendas . ". ... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 26,1996 - 6:30 P.M. -, For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Pre-Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop '820. ~UMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. GN 96-81 ," . Civil Service CÖmmissiòn Rècommendation 1:b"" ~" Amend Civil Service Rule 11.01 (TÈtbled at the '; ":~ ' . July 8, 1996 Meeting) 'H ,(Agenda Item No. 11) (5 minutes) "'.~ ..'i.. .. . ,.... ''-': - _..~. ~.. .... . 2. PW 96-46 . , t ~, Approve Revised City-Developer AgreemeÌíf . Concerning Hightower Drive Paving ~," . ~,~:' , Participation, Stoney Ridge Addition (Edèn".(' ;: ',., Addition, Fourth Filing) (Agenda Item No. 27) (5mlnutes) . _...... . .. .- .. 3. Set Date for Reception for City Half' ::: . , " : : ~ .........--...... . ,.. .-.... ,,'- ...'.. ...... ...... ~ '\. . ........ '. 4. Other Items . . 5. *Executive Session (10 Minutes) - The Council may enter into closed executive session to discuss the following: A. Consultation with Attorneý'·under'-Gi;v':·.;!~· :,~:'" . ~, Code §551.071: Y. Auto Liability ClaiÓl . ' Kyser vs. NRH \r~.:' .' " .. .. - '-. ~ 6. Adjournment - 6:50 p.m. . g}~-dq0 , I *Olosed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. ·''''jf any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. Dab? By I:tf~ Time ~~. ;;g: '--'. . . e ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA August 26, 1996 For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items marked with an * are on the consent agenda and will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 581-5502 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting August 12, 1996 , .. . ,: , ,- 5. Presentations by Boards & ,¡ Commissions a. Park and Recreation Board Minutes 6. Presentation of "Yard of the Month" Awards . . e Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7. Presentation of "Landscape of the Month" Award 8. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 9. Consent Agenda Item(s) Indicated by Asterisk (10, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 & 28) *10. PS 96-19 Request of Curtis Young for Final Plat of Lots 1-3, Block 1, Young Addition. (Located at the southeast corner of Cummings Drive and Lola Drive) 11. GN 96-81 Civil Service Commission Recommendation to Amend Civil Service Rule 11.01 (Tabled at the July 8, 1996 Meeting) *12. GN 96-98 Drainage System - Ratification of Ordinance No. 1727 13. GN 96-99 Appointment to Animal Control Shelter Advisory Committee *14. GN 96-100 Yardwaste Reduction Partnership Project Coordinator , e . e Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 15. GN 96-101 Public Hearing on Proposed Tax Rate for 1996/97 Fiscal Year 16. GN 96-102 Public Hearing on Proposed 1996/97 Budget *17. GN 96-103 Approve Cross Connection Control Program - Ordinance No. 2138 *18. GN 96-105 Supporting the Reauthorization of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act - Resolution No. 96-57 *19. GN 96-106 Supporting H.R. 842 Truth in Transportation Budgeting Act - Resolution No. 96-54 *20. GN 96-107 Supporting the Removal of the Sunset Provision of the Crime Control and Prevention Act - Resolution No. 96-55 *21. GN 96-108 Supporting the Establishment of a North Texas Tollway Authority - Resolution No. 96-56 *22. GN 96-109 Contract Authorizing NETS Funding Page 4 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *23. PU 96-63 Award Bid for Computer Editing System *24. PU 96-64 Award Bid for Street Reconstruction *25. PW 96-44 Approve Interlocal Agreement with Tarrant County for the Construction of North Tarrant Parkway *26. PW 96-45 Approve Transfer of Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Funds to Calloway Branch 21" Parallel Sewer (Lola Drive to Holiday Lane) *27. PW 96-46 Approve Revised City-Developer Agreement Concerning Hightower Drive Paving Participation, Stoney Ridge Addition (Eden Addition, Fourth Filing) *28. PAY 96-07 Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 3 in the Amount of $39,124.20 to Sharrock Electric, Inc. for Traffic Signalization on Mid-Cities Boulevard at Holiday Lane 29. Citizens Presentation POSTf_D ) .... - 1/\ 1 /c./)J/7f¿, 30. Adjournment I~te / 1"L)~j)kn lIme . - ~4;k4-- By e e e e -- e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT ROOM, 6720 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - AUGUST 12, 1996 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order August 12, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Mack Garvin Lyle E. Welch Mark Wood Don Phifer Byron Sibbet Linda Spurlock Sansoucie Staff: C.A. Sanford Randy Shiflet Larry Cunningham Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Greg Dickens Absent: JoAnn Johnson Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer Councilwoman 2. I NVOCA TION Councilman Wood gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mr. John Marshall, Troop 502, led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JULY 22, 1996 APPROVED e e e e -- e City Council Minutes August 12, 1996 Page 2 Councilman Wood moved to approve the minutes of the July 22, 1996 Council meeting subject to Councilman Wood abstaining on Agenda Item No. 14. Motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Garvin. Motion carried 6-0. 5. PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. TEEN COURT ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES B. BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION MINUTES No action necessary. 6. IR 96-81 - SPECIAL PRESENTATION - DISTINGUISHED BUDGET PRESENTATION AWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 Ms. Anita Thetford, an officer of Government Finance Officers Association, presented to Mayor Brown, Finance Director Patrick Elfrink and Budget Coordinator Debbie DUrko, the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the 1995/96 Comprehensive Annual Budget. Ms. Thetford also presented to Ms. Durko a Certificate of Recognition for Budget Preparation. 7. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA None. 8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (9, 10,14, 17, 19,20,21,22,23,24,26 & 27) APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 6-0. e e e e -- e City Council Minutes August 12, 1996 Page 3 *9. GN 96-89 - INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION _ RESOLUTION NO. 96-53 ' APPROVED *10. GN 96-90 - EARLY HIRE OF CRIME CONTROL DISTRICT POSITIONS APPROVED 11. GN 96-91 - APPOINTMENT TO TOWN HALL COMMITTEE APPROVED Councilman Wood moved,seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Garvin, to appoint Mr. Jerry Tyner to Place 3 on the Town Hall Committee. Motion carried 6-0. 12. GN 96-92 - APPOINTMENT TO PARK AND RECREATION BOARD APPROVED Councilman Phifer moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to appoint Ms. Cheryl Lyman as Alternate to the Park and Recreation Board. Motion carried 6-0. 13. GN 96-93 - CONSIDERATION OF A DEEP WATER WELL _ 7716 DAVIS BOULEVARD APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to approve GN 96-93. Motion carried 6-0. City Council Minutes August 12, 1996 Page 4 e e *14. GN 96-94 - SETTING DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR 1996-97 CITY BUDGET, PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT BUDGETS APPROVED 16. GN 96-95 - RECORD VOTE ON PROPOSED TAX RATE AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING APPROVED Councilman Phifer moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Garvin, to approve GN 96-95. Motion carried 6-0. 16. GN 96-96 - PARK BOARD RECOMMENDATION FOR PARK NAMES _ RESOLUTION NO. 96-14 tt APPROVED e Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve Resolution No. 96-14. Motion carried 6-0. *17. GN 96-97 - REVISION OF SCHOOL ZONE HOURS AT RICHLAND HIGH SCHOOL - ORDINANCE NO. 2136 APPROVED 18. PU 96-59 - AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL AUDITING SERVICES APPROVED Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Garvin, to approve PU 96-59. Motion carried 6-0. -- e I -- . -- . City Council Minutes August 12, 1996 Page 5 *19. PU 96-60 - RATIFY PURCHASE OF TABLES FOR PRE-COUNCIL CHAMBERS APPROVEQ *20. PU 96-61 - RATIFY PURCHASE OF MOTOROLA RADIOS APPROVED *21. PU 96-62 - APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH REED MUNICIPAL SERVICES, INC. APPROVEQ *22. PW 96-38 - CONTRACT FOR LABORATORY SERVICES WITH THE TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY APPROVED *23. PW 96-39 - RIGHT .oF-WAY DEDICATION TO TARRANT COUNTY FOR NORTH TARRANT PARKWAY AND LB-1 CHANNEL _ RESOLUTION NO. 96-51 APPROVEQ *24. PW 96-40 - SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS PLAN FOR REVISION OF IMPACT FEES FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS- RESOLUTION NO. 96-52 APPROVED 25. PW 96-41 - AWARD OF BID ON RUMFIELD ROAD, PHASE I CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED Councilman Wood moved. seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve PW 96-41. Motion carried 6-0. e e e . - e None. City Council Minutes August 12, 1996 Page 6 *26. PW 96-42 - APPROVE CITY-DEVELOPER AGREEMENT CONCERNING HIGHTOWER DRIVE PAVING PARTICIPATION, EDEN ADDITION, FOURTH FILING APPROVED *27. PW 96-43 - APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE AMENDMENT STUDY APPROVED 28. CITIZENS PRESENTATION 29. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting. ATTEST: Tommy Brown - Mayor Patricia Hutson - City Secretary MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD AT THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, PRE-COUNCIL CHAMBERS LOCATED AT 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 June 3, 1996 - 6:00 P.M. . ATTENDANCE PRESENT: Board: Don Tipps Sharon Battles J. Douglass Davis Pam Jackson Bobbie Lambert Ann Perchard Rick Work Staff: . Jim Browne Larry Cunningham Christina Lopez Chris Swartz Bill Thornton Monica Sue Walsh ABSENT: Kami Graves Chairman Vice Chairwoman Board Member Board Member Board Member Board Member Board Member Director of Parks & Recreation Assistant City Manager Administrative Secretary Aquatic Manager Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation Board Member ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Tipps called the meeting to order June 3, 1996 at 6:15 P.M. ITEM 2. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES (Passed 7-0) Mr. Davis made a motion, seconded by Mr. Lambert, to approve the minutes of the April 1, 1996. . 1 ITEM 3. NATIONAL SPORTS FOUNDATION & NRPA NATIONAL GOLD MEDAL FINALIST Mr. Browne explained to the Board that the Parks and Recreation Department has been selected as one of four finalist in the 1996 National Gold Medal Awards program. The awards are presented by the National Sports Foundation, and National Recreation and Park Association. Jim explained that the department is very proud to achieve this honor. As a finalist, staff prepared a video for submittal for the final review. The video was presented to the Park Board. Mr. Davis commented that the video looks good and said we are very fortunate to have ,Jim Browne with us. ITEM 4. PARK OPERATIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Mr. Thornton provided a report of the status of the Parks Maintenance Department and Capital Improvement Projects. Discussion was held. The Calloway Branch Trail - Council approved execution of the agreement at their April 8 meeting. NJB, Inc. is proceeding with gathering base data and preparing on-site survey information. The Bedford-Euless Road Landscape project is in the last phase of planting. The Tennis Center and Practice Fields parking lot has been completed, the building slab poured, the building columns erected, and the structural steel is currently being installed. The excavation i~ complete on the championship court and two other courts, and the remaining 13 courts have been rough graded. The scheduled opening date is January 1, 1997. North Electric Trail design work is in progress and is expected to be completed for TxDOT review in June. Additional hydrological studies are required for the extended bridge crossing at Calloway Branch and Walkers Branch creeks. Staff is proceeding with the preparation of the plans and specifications of Glenview Neighborhood Park for the construction of the first phase of development. Plans will be completed for this phase in late June. The playground design is complete. The multi-use trail and pavilion design will be completed in-house. North Hills Mall Multi-Use Trail - an ISTEA Grant Application was submitted March 15, 1996, staff is waiting for completion of review. City Park Site - a TPWD Grant Application may be submitted prior to the July 31, 1996 deadline, design work will continue until the anticipated award notification in January 1997. Construction on Phase I, is expected to begin in March 1997. As soon as the topography survey is complete, concept planning will begin. City Hall Landscaping and Irrigation is complete. Some plant material, which died, will be replaced as warranty items. 2 , Construction of NRH20's "Enhancements" have been completed with the exception of a few minor items. . Brinkley Sargent Architects are proceeding with the NRH20 Master Plan. Standard Park Signage - the consultant is preparing and refining concepts for the various types of signage within our parks and trails. The signs will be made of easily reproducible, modular, heavy duty material. An ISTEA Grant Application for the Cottonbelt Trail Depot and R~st Station was submitted on March 15, 1996 for the items we are eligible for. The playground was not eligible. The sidewalk and irrigation have been installed at Richfield Park, other improvements are continuing. Additional design work is being completed in order to issue bids for the lighting. Grass will go down in the next few weeks. The next step will be relocating the lighting controls into the building. Mid-Cities Boulevard Landscape and Irrigation - Plans and Specifications are being prepared, and are tentatively scheduled for bidding in July. Dan Echols Parking Lot and Playground Improvements - funding is expected to be approved in July, and a contract for the design work will be executed once the project is approved. . ITEM 5. RECREATION, ATHLETICS AND SENIOR ADULTS Ms. Monica Walsh provided a report of activities in recreation, athletics, and senior adult services. Proceeds from the Family Festival in the Park were distributed to the following: $1,200 to the Clothes Connection and $1,200 for the Teen After School Program. The Annual Tap and Ballet Dance Recital was held on May 17. More than 100 students performed to a full auditorium. The Leisure Resource Guide was mailed the second week of May. All sessions of Summer Day Camp are filled with at least 10-15 people on the waiting list. Several dance classes performed at Maytest. Tina Harvey has joined our staff as Recreation Supervisor. She has twelve years experience in Parks and Recreation. Tina has worked for Fort Worth, Grapevine and Southlake Parks and Recreation Departments. The last Teen Dance of the year had about 700 teens, the largest crowd ever, and was also one of the best run dances. . Summer Programs are set to begin on June 3, 1996. 3 Youth At Risk The North Richland Middle School drama class held a performance at North Richland Middle School on April 18, 1996. Teens from the North Richland After School Drama Club performed jointly with the Dan Echols senior adults on May 17. The intergenerational play was entitled "Girls Night Out." - The Teens on The Edge After School program finished the school year on May 24. The program will resume at North Richland Middle and Northridge Middle in August when school commences. Bursey Road Center The bid was awarded with construction beginning on June 10 for the renovation and expansion of the Bursey Road Senior Center. All Bursey Road Senior Center programs will take place at the NRH Recreation Center during the renovation. A new watercolor class began April 17. Both the April and May luncheons were well attended. The Richland High Spanish Club performed on April 18. The second "Games Night" was held on May 6 with more than 40 seniors attending. A picnic was held at Northfield Park on May 24. The seniors grilled hot dogs and enjoyed being outside. Dan Echols Center The Swinging Seniors performed at Mayfest, Main Street Days in Grapevine, along with several other locations during the months of April and May. The "Bake and Garage" sale held on May 10-11 raised funds for the Swinging Seniors costumes. The Saginaw Kitchen Band performed during the May luncheon. Ninety-three seniors enjoyed the live music of the Gary Lee Band on May 14. Dan Echols Senior Center Council planned the annual Volunteer Appreciation Luncheon at Chiantis Italian Cafe. More than 45 seniors attended the awards luncheon. The North Richland Hills Fire Department presented an informative program on safety. 4 , ATHLETICS . NYSCA Hook a Kid On Golf program is being offered for the fifth year. Ms. Walsh said we have peopling calling us to volunteer as sponsors for the kids. NYSCA certifications for baseball continues with more than 200 volunteer coaches trained for this season alone. North Richland Hills received statewide recognition from NYSCA as being one of the most productive chapter's in the State. Indoor volleyball registration totaled 23 teams participating two nights a week. The Mid Cities Classic Softball Tournament took place on April 27th with more than 1,000 people in attendance. Christ Haven Orphanage in Keller received a donation of $900 from the proceeds of the tournament. The Fieldhouse was secured as the Title Sponsor for the 5th Annual Future Stars Basketball Camp. Registration for summer softball and indoor volleyball ended May 31. Registration for sand volleyball and men's basketball ends June 4. Registration for the TA.A.F. Men's Church State Softball Tournament ends on June 21. . ITEM 6. Aquatics Update Chris Swartz, Aquatic Manager, updated the Board regarding activities at NRH20. NRH20 opened for weekends on May 18 and opened for daily operations on Memorial Day weekend. In addition, NRH20 held an "exclusive" rental for approximately 400 Keller Middle School Students on Monday, May 20th. Attendance for the first six days of operation has totaled nearly 11,500. Memorial Day yielded our 3rd busiest day ever with nearly 3,600 guests in attendance. Park attendance is lower than normal this week since BISD is still in session until May 30th. The new innertube slide opened on Saturday during the Memorial Day weekend to rave reviews. Many of the guests are taking advantage of the "cooler" policy. The Concession area is doing very well. The Ice Cream Shoppe has created more than $6,500 in revenue so far this year compared to the arcade which only brought in $6,700 for the entire 1995 season. Professor Frogstein and the Elements of Fun have been a big hit. Every morning when the park opens the Professor is at the front gate greeting guests and at the close of business he is at the gate waving goodbye. The Professor and the Elements of Fun also make their way through the park entertaining the guests. . 5 Season Pass sales are fast approaching last year's totals. Total revenues, to date, is more than $270,000. The Guest Service Kiosk is working well. Ellis and Associates conducted the first of three audits which will be completed over the course of the summer, we either satisfied or exceeded the standards set forth. They were very impressed with the park and said the pool water was great. ITEM 7. GIRLS FASTPITCH SOFTBALL COMPLEX Mr. Thornton updated the Board on the Girls Fastpitch Softball Complex which will be located behind NRH20 Family Water Park. Staff should know, around July 31, the status of a Texas Parks and Wildlife Grant that was submitted. The park will include four 225' lighted softball fields, restroom/concession building, parking lot, shade pavilion, playground and shaded areas. The park has a planned single entry off of Emerald Hills Way with a centrally located parking lot. The park will be tied into the North Electric Trail up to the restroom/concession building and continue to NRH20. The restroom/concession building will be four small units tied together with tresses or shade structures. Staff has met with NRGSL for their input. ITEM 8. DISCUSSION OF SOCCER ISSUES (Passed 7-0) Ms. Walsh updated the Board regarding several discussions with the soccer associations over numerous items such as name changes, maintenance fees, cooperative agreements and grand opening ceremonies. Mr. Davis commented that he knows this was a tremendous amount of work and is so proud of what staff has done in getting the soccer associations to change their names to reflect North Richland Hills. MOTION: Mr. Davis made a motion, seconded by Ms. Battles, that we give Ms. Walsh one day off with pay for this accomplishment. Motion Passed 7-0. Both associations have changed their names and will be officially recognized by their new names this summer. North East Soccer Association's (NESA) new name is North Richland Hills Soccer Association (NRHSA) and the Haltom Richland Soccer Association's (HRSA) new name is North Richland Hills Area Soccer League (NRHASL). A cooperative agreement has been signed by both soccer associations to coordinate the use of Green Valley soccer fields. The cooperative committee will consist of two individuals from each soccer association as well as a representative from the Parks and Recreation Department. A majority of the committee will be North Richland Hills residents. Staff introduced the idea of maintenance fees to both associations. The purpose of the maintenance fee is to charge user groups a fee to offset the costs associated with the city maintaining the athletic fields. League play begins in September 1996. 6 . MOTION: Ms. Battles made a motion, seconded by Mr. Davis, that we send a recommendation to City Council to add a $10 nonresident fee and an $8 resident fee to the soccer registration fees. Motion passed 6-0. Discussion was also held regarding the concessions. Concessions are operated by RY A and NRGSL at Richfield Park and Fossil Creek Park, respectively. At Northfield Park, where the city operates adult softball leagues, concessions are let out for bids. Neither youth soccer association is interested in operating the concessions at Green Valley. All buildings must meet code and requirements pertaining to city health inspections. All persons w()rking in the concession stand must also attend a food handlers class. Concession buildings are inspected several times throughout the season. Permits are issued by the Environmental Services Department. The Parks and Recreation Department does receive a $50.00 per month lease from RYA and NRGSL for the use of the concession buildings at Richfield Park and Fossil Creek Park. Northfield concessions are bid out, and they do pay $100 per month for leasing the facility. Mr. Lambert commented if staff bid out the concessions that he thought we would get more than $100 per month. Given the fact that neither soccer association is interested in managing the concessions, with their volunteers, it would appear at this time to be more practical to bid out the concessions similar to Northfield Park. . ITEM 9. PARK NAMING COMMITTEE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Passed 6-0) Staff met with the Park Naming Committee prior to this meeting to discuss naming of Parks and Recreation facilities. Mr. Lambert made a motion, seconded by Ms. Battles, to name the Girls Softball Complex located off Emerald Hills Way "Walkers Creek Park." Motion passed 6-0. Mr. Lambert made a motion, seconded by Ms. Perchard, to name the park site located at 6400 Glenview Drive "Glenview Park." Motion passed 6-0. Mr. Lambert made a motion, seconded by Mr. Davis, to name the park site located at 7111 N. E. Loop 820 "North Richland Hills Tennis Center." Motion passed 6-0. Mr. Lambert made a motion, seconded by Ms. Battles, to table the naming of the 100 Acre Park Site located at 7451 Starnes Road until a later date. Motion passed 6-0. ITEM 10. DISCUSSION OF OTHER ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA . Mr. Jim Streit, NRGSL Vice Commissioner updated the Board regarding NRGSL's current season. NRGSL has more than 560 girls playing in the Spring/Summer season - Recreational program. 7 NRGSL has been receiving good publicity in the paper, they have assigned this task to one person to get the word out about NRGSL. Mr. Streit thanked the Park and Recreation Department for allowing their input in the design of the new park, and for all the improvements at Fossil Creek Park before the season started. The fields are well maintained, they can even play immediately after it rains because the fields drain so well. ITEM 11. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Battles made a motion, seconded by Mr. Lambert, to adjourn. the meeting at 8:00 P.M. Motion carried 6-0. ~(~ ~ Don Tipps, hairperson ATTEST: (J~'~ Christina Lopez, Administrã~tary 8 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 8/26/96 Subject: Request of Curtis Young for Final Plat of Lots 1-3, Block 1, Agenda Number: PS 96-19 Young Addition. (Located at the southeast corner of Cummings Drive and Lola Drive) Curtis Young is the owner of a 1.307 acre tract of land located at the southeast corner of Cummings Drive and Lola Drive. The developer has submitted a Final Plat of the property for review and consideration by the City Council. The plat would subdivide the property into three lots. The following are the major items regarding this Final Plat. Other comments are included in the attached engineering comments letter. 1. Zoning This property is presently zoned R-2 Single Family Residential. The R-2 district requires a minimum lot size of 9,000 square feet, and a minimum dwelling unit size of 1,800 square feet. Houses built on these lots will also require a side or rear entry garage. The proposed lots appear to meet the minimum criteria of the R-2 zoning district. 2. Sidewalks Sidewalks are required on this property's frontage on Lola Drive and Cummings Drive. The sidewalks must be constructed as part of the building construction on the lot. 3. Adjacent Property There is a small triangular parcel of land located at the southwest corner of this tract that is owned by Richland Enterprises, Inc. This parcel was part of the plat for the Holiday Heights Addition plat. The developer intends to purchase this property, and then replat Lot 1 at a later date. Richland Enterprises has granted an ingress and egress easement across this parcel to allow for a drive approach for Lot 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this Final Plat at its August 8. 1996, meeting and recommended approval subject to engineering comments. and that the filing information for the ingress/egress easement be referenced on the plat. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other 6C(Q;}1~~ ~ e artment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available ,Finance Director City Manager ~ubdivision Plat Review Fact Sheet Case Number PS 96-19 . GENERAL INFORMA TlON 1. Owner 2. Developer 3. Engineer 4. Surveyor 5. Acreage 6. No. of Lots 7. Density 8. Zoning 9. Prop. Use UTILITY SERVICES 1. Water Lines 2. Sewer Lines 3. Fire Protection Curtis Young - PO Box 54176 - Hurst 76054 same Ernest Hedgcoth Consulting Engineers - 5701 C Midway Road - Fort Worth 76117 same 1.307 acres 3 lots 2.30 units per acre R-2 Single Family Residential Single family residences There is a 12 inch water line located on the north side of Lola Drive. There is a 6 inch sanitary sewer line that runs across the rear of all three lots. There is also a 24 inch line that runs diagonally through the property. Hydrant coverage is adequate. There is one hydrant located at the northwest corner of Cummings Drive and Janetta Drive, and another hydrant located across Lola Drive at the southwest corner of the church property. .STREETS AND THOROUGHFARES 1. Thoroughfare Plan This property has frontage on Cummings Drive and Lola Drive. Cummings Drive is classified as an R2U Residential street (50-foot right of way, 2 lanes, undivided roadway). Lola Drive is classified as a C2U Minor Collector (60 foot right of way, 2 lanes, undivided roadway). 2. Improvements 3. Street Extensions 4. New Streets 5. Street Lights 6. Access None None None Any required street lights will be installed in accordance with Public Works criteria. Primary access to this property is from Lola Drive. Secondary access to the western most lot is from Cummings Drive, via an access easement across a small triangular parcel of land. 7. Sidewalks Sidewalks are required to be constructed on all lots when the buildings are constructed. 8. Screening Walls None required. . 9. New Street Names None MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN 1. Flood Plain Flood Insurance Rate Maps indicate that this property does not lie within the 1 DO-year or SOD-year flood plain. 2. Improvements None. 3. Easements None. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN 1. Development The Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan calls for low density single famify development in this area. The request is consistent with the development policy set out in the Land Use Plan. 2. Special Issues None. . CITY OF N*RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works May 30, 1996 MEMO TO: Barry LeBaron Director of Planning and Inspection Services FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E. Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS96-19; YOUNG ADDITION; Block 1, Lots 1-3; Final Plat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on May 8, 1996. The following items are for your consideration. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OUTSTANDING ITEMS, WE FEEL THAT THIS PLAT SHOULD NOT BE PLACED ON AGENDA FOR P & Z CONSIDERATION. . 1. The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 7.5 foot Utility Easement on either side of the existing sanitary sewer line. This easement needs to be tied to the existing manholes to verify easement location. This needs to be shown on a separate topographical drawing. 2. It appears to be sufficient error in the survey to create inadequate closure. This needs to be resolved with the next submittal. All corners need to have iron rod labeled as found or set. 3. The street intersection will require a sidewalk and utility easement as defined in the Design Manual. The easement needs to be clearly indicated on the Final Plat. 4. Lola Drive is designated as a C2U on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. This designation requires a 60 foot ultimate right-of-way. The ultimate right-of-way requirement is a total of 30 feet south of the existing centerline. When Lola Drive and the Lola Drive Bridge over Calloway Branch were reconstructed in 1993, they were built as a R2U. ROW for Cummings Drive is 50 feet. The ultimate ROW requirement is a total of 25 feet east of the existing centerline. . P.O. Box 820609 "North Richland Hills, Texas * 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 *817-581-5521" FAX 817-656-7503 The distance from the centerline of any existing roadway of a perimeter street to the proposed subdivision shall be shown to determine the adequacy of the ROW along the route and to determine if additional ROW is necessary to accommodate the ultimate ROW. Sufficient iron pins shall be found or set and shown on the drawing together with dimensions to adequately describe all perimeter streets. This will need to be verified with the next submittal. 5. The Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. If and when the lots are developed, the sidewalks along Cummings Drive will need to be added to the construction plans and built with the improvements. 6. The west property line, as shown, does not parallel Cummings Drive. All property under the same ownership needs to be shown on the Final Plat. This includes the omitted triangular piece between Cummings Drive and the proposed property line. 7. Lot 2 has a narrow buildable area at the center of the lot due to the utility easement. This is adequate for a residential structure, although the acceptable designs will be limited. No buildings or structures will be allowed within the easement. 8. The water and sewer services for the lots are the responsibility of the developer. This review was based on the Final Plat and the Preliminary Plat drawing which showed the utility layout and fire hydrant coverage. The marked up bluelines need to be returned with the next submittal. ~J;rJ.~ Ju W. Skare, P.Et. Staff Engineer JWS\pwm96075 cc: Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director . . . ERNEST HEDGCOTH Consulting Engineers. Inc. PLANNING · DESIGN · ENGINEERING June 12, 1996 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Ref: PS96-19 Young Addition Block 1, Lots 1,2& 3 Final Plat Dear Sir; I have reviewed the May 30, 1996 comments concerning the Preliminary Plat for the Young Addition, Block 1, Lots 1,2 & 3. The following comments are referenced per the staff report: 1. A fifteen foot utility easement is located along the south property lines A twenty foot easement covers the utilities at the southeast comer and a fifteen foot easement covers the sewer thru lot 2. All of the above easements exceed the City ordinance requirements. 2. The field notes have be corrected and the calls shown clockwise. Iron rods are set and labeled at each comer. 3. Sidewalks will be provided when the buildings are constructed. 4. Thirty feet from the property comer to the center of Lola Drive is shown for a total of sixty feet right of way. Twenty five feet from the property comer to the center of Cummings Drive is shown for a total of fifty feet right of way. 5. The sidewalks will be constructed when the buildings are constructed. 6. The small triangle at the southwest comer is leased to Mobil Pipe Line Company. 7. The building plans for Lot 2 will not encroach onto the utility easement. 8. The property has water and sewer available. The above corrections have been made to the Final Plat and the adjustments made to the Preliminary Plat for your review and approval. 5701-C Midway Road Fort Worth. Texas 76117 817-831-7711 Thank you for your assistance in processing this plat. If you have any questions or need additional information please call (817)831-7711. Sincerely ~o~ 9560 FP nrh.com . CITY OF N*RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works June 24, 1996 MEMO TO: Barry LeBaron Director of Planning and Inspection Services FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E. Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS96-19; YOUNG ADDITION; Block 1, Lots 1-3; Final Plat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on June 17, 1996. The following items are for your consideration. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OUTSTANDING ITEMS, WE FEEL THAT THIS PLAT SHOULD NOT BE PLACED ON AGENDA FOR P & Z CONSIDERATION. . 1. The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 7.5 foot Utility Easement on either side of the existing sanitary sewer line. This easement needs to be tied to the existing manholes to verify easement location. 2. There appears to be sufficient error in the survey to create inadequate closure. This needs to be resolved before plans are resubmitted. 3. The street intersection will require a sidewalk and utility easement as defined in the Design Manual, Section 1-04, B., 14. The easement needs to be clearly indicated on the Final Plat. 4. Lola Drive is designated as a C2U on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. This designation requires a 60 foot ultimate right-of-way. The ultimate right-of-way requirement is a total of 30 feet south of the existing centerline. When Lola Drive and the Lola Drive Bridge over Calloway Branch were reconstructed in 1993, they were only built as a R2U. Also, the ROW for Cummings Drive is 50 feet. The ultimate ROW requirement is a total of 25 feet east of the existing centerline. The distance from the centerline of any existing roadway of a perimeter street to the proposed subdivision shall be shown to determine the adequacy of the ROW along . P.O. Box 820609 . North Richland Hills, Texas. 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820·817-581-5521 . FAX 817-656-7503 the route and to determine if additional ROW is necessary to accommodate the ultimate street cross section. Sufficient existing iron pins along the opposite side of the street need to be tied in and shown on the drawing together with dimensions to adequately describe all perimeter streets. This will need to be verified with the next submittal. 5. Show location and size for proposed water and sanitary sewer services. Sewer services should be tied into the 6" sanitary sewer along the south side of the property . 6. Water and sewer services will need to be installed by a utility contractor as part of the platting process prior to any building permits being issued. 7. Ownership information for the unplatted piece of property covered by a Mobil pipeline easement at the southwest corner of this plat will need to be provided with the next submittal. 8. The location and size of any curb inlets on Lola Drive adjacent to this property will need to be shown on the next submittal. 9. The location of the driveway approach for Lot 1 will be dictated by the Design Manual, Section 1-04, D., 1e. "The drive approach on comer lots must be located to approximately line up with the side of the house or garage that is farthest from the intersection." This review was based on the resubmitted Final Plat and the Preliminary Plat drawing which showed the utility layout and fire hydrant coverage. The marked up bluelines need to be returned with the next submittal. Construction plans for the water and sewer services will need to be submitted for review to Public Works. .~Jr. M(flÁ ß. Juli W. Skare, P.D( Staff Engineer JWS\pwm96087 cc: Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director 06/26/96 0;:23 FAX 817 831 6368 ~~\THON CO~1Jl\C ~C04 . ERNEST HEDGCOTH Consulting Engineers, Inc. PLANNING . DESIGN · ENGINEERING June 25. 1996 Plamúng & Zoning Commission C.ity of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 820609 North Riehl and Hills. Texas 16180 Ref: PS96-19 Young Addition Block I. Lots 1,2& 3 Final Plat Dear Sir; I have reviewed the June 24. 1996 comments concerning the Preliminary Plat for the Y OW1g Addition, Block I. Lots 1,2 & 3. The following comments are referenced per the staffreport: 1. The easements will meet the required 7.5 feet on each side of the line and tied to the . property corners. 2. The closure will be corrected. 3. Easements for the sidewalks and utilities at the intersection will be shown on the plat. 4. Iron pins for the right.of-wa)'S for Lola. and Cummings wìl.1 be shown on the plat. 5. The water and sewer services will be shown on the preliminary plat and construction plans will be prepared. 6. Plans for the services will be prepared as noted in item #5. 7. The ownership of the small portion at the southwest comet is unkno\'\'I1. Mr. Young has investigated the possibility that his fatber owns the property. Tiú$ is based on the intent of the seller at the time Mr. Young's father purchased the property. 8_ The curb cuts will be shown on the preliminary plat. 9. The driveway approach will comply with the City Design Manual, Section 1-04, D., Ie. . The above corrections have been made to the Final Plat and the adjustments made to the Preliminary Plat for your review and approval. 5701-C Midway Road Fort Worth. Texas 76117 817·831~7711 06/26/96 07:23 R~ 817 A31 6368 }lo\RATHON CO:-.lTRAC ~005 Thank you fOT your assistance in processing this plat. If you have any questions or need additional information p lease call (8 I 7)83 1-7711. Sincerely ~:.;~~o~ 9560_FP _nrh.com . CITY OF N$RTH RIC~~~ND HILLS . . July 1 1996 MEMO TO: Barry LeBaron Director of Planning and Inspection Services FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E. Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS96-19; YOUNG ADDITION; Block 1, Lots 1-3; Final Plat We have reviewed the response letter submitted to this office on June 25, 1996 and several faxes submitted per Public Works request. The following items are for your consideration. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OUTSTANDING ITEMS, WE FEEL THAT THIS PLAT SHOULD NOT BE PLACED ON AGENDA FOR P & Z CONSIDERATION. 1. The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 7.5 foot Utility Easement on either side of the existing sanitary sewer line. This easement needs to be tied to the existing manholes to verify easement location. This needs to be shown on the next submittal. 2. There appears to be sufficient error in the survey to create inadequate closure. This needs to be resolved before plans are resubmitted. It appears the N 71 03' 39" W reading should be S 71 03' 39" E. The adjacent property to the south needs to be shown correctly. 3. The street intersection will require a sidewalk and utility easement as defined in the Design Manual, Section 1-04, B., 14. The easement needs to be clearly indicated on the Final Plat. 4. Lola Drive is designated as a C2U on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. This designation requires a 60 foot ultimate right-of-way. The ultimate right-of-way requirement is a total of 30 feet south of the existing centerline. When Lola Drive and the Lola Drive Bridge over Calloway Branch were reconstructed in 1993, they were only built as a R2U. Also, the ROW for Cummings Drive is 50 feet. The ultimate ROW requirement is a total of 25 feet east of the existing centerline. The distance from the centerline of any existing roadway of a perimeter street to the proposed subdivision shall be shown to determine the adequacy of the ROW along the route and to determine if additional ROW is P.O. Box 820609 · North Richland Hills, Texas. 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820·817-581-5521 . FAX 817-656-7503 necessary to accommodate the ultimate street cross section. Sufficient existing iron pins along the opposite side of the street need to be tied in and shown on the drawing together with dimensions to adequately describe all perimeter streets. This will need to be verified with the next submittal. 5. Show location and size for proposed water and sanitary sewer services. Sewer services should be tied into the 6" sanitary sewer along the south side of the property. 6. Water and sewer services will need to be installed by a utility contractor as part of the platting process prior to any building permits being issued. There are drainage structures under Lola Drive which will need to be taken into consideration. 7. Ownership information for the unplatted piece of property covered by a Mobil pipeline easement at the southwest corner of this plat will need to be provided with the next submittal. The volume and page referenced on the plat do not cover the Mobil pipeline easement on the southwest corner of the proposed platted property. Volume 4375, Page 498 is for the property to the south. The correct Volume and Page of Deed as well as Owner's name is required. 8. The location and size of any curb inlets on Lola Drive adjacent to this property will need to be shown on the next submittal. 9. The location of the driveway approach for Lot 1 will be dictated by the Design Manual, Section 1-04, D" 1 e. "The drive approach on corner lots must be located to approximately line up with the side of the house or garage that is farthest from the intersection." This needs to be shown with the next submittal. 10. Flow arrows will need to be shown on drawing with lot outline and contours to verify lots will meet Residential lot grading criteria. This review was based on the response letter and several conversations with the Engineer. The marked up bluelines need to be returned with the next submittal. Construction plans for the water and sewer services will need to be submitted for review to Public Works. The resubmitted plat and plans will need to be received by Public Works by 10:00 am, Tuesday, July 2 to be considered for the July 11 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting or by Friday, July 12 for consideration of the July 25 meeting. ~tw~~~· cc: Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director . . . ERNEST HEDGCOTH Consulting Engineers, Inc. PLANNING · DESIGN · ENGINEERING July 8, 1996 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Ref PS96-19 Young Addition Block 1, Lots 1,2& 3 Final Plat Dear Sir; I have reviewed the July 1, 1996 comments concerning the Preliminary Plat for the Young Addition, Block 1, Lots 1,2 & 3. The following comments are referenced per the staff report: 1. The existing sanitary sewer line along the south property line crosses onto the Young property at the southeast comer of Lot 1. It continues in a northeasterly direction to the east line of the Young property. The existing line is five feet from the south property line at the southeast comer of Lot 2 and twelve feet from the south property line at the east property line. The existing sanitary sewer manhole located forty feet sixty six hundreds west of the east line and fourteen feet north of the south property line is within the new fifteen utility easement extending from Lola and the twenty foot easement at the southeast comer of Lot 3. All of the existing sanitary sewer lines are within an easement with at least seven and haIffeet of clearance. Block 41, Lots 1R, 2R, 3R Richland Terrace Addition recorded in Volume 388-57, Page 133, Tarrant County Plat Records has a five foot utility easement along the north line of Block 41 making a total easement along the south line of twenty feet. 2. The description has been corrected to indicated the correct bearings and distances. 3. A sidewalk and utility easement has been shown on the plat. 4. The right-of-way for Lola Drive is fifty feet. The Young Addition has dedicated five additional feet for the future sixty foot right-of- way. The distance to the centerline of Lola and Cummings Drives has been shown. An "x" has been shown for comer on the west side of Cummings and iron pins set on the north side of Lola. This complies with the requirement to show sufficient existing iron pins along the opposite side of the street to tie the dimensions to adequately describe all perimeter streets. This required the surveying of three additional properties since the City did not relocate any iron pins when Lola Drive was reconstructed. 5701-C Midway Road Fort Worth, Texas 76117 817-831-7711 5. The one inch and three quarter inch water services in Lola Drive are shown. All of the sewer services will be four inches and tie to the existing six inch sewer line along the south property line. 6. Mr. Young has made arrangements to have the City install the services and he will pay the fees for the installations. If not a utility contractor will install them according tot the City Specifications. 7. The property to the southwest of Lot 1 is shown on the Holiday Heights Addition Plat recorded in Volume 388-35, Page 11-12, Tarrant County Plat Records. These documents indicate the owner to be RicWand Enterprise, Inc. 8. The two twenty foot curb inlets are shown on the preliminary plat as requested. Lot 1 has seventeen feet from the end of the most easterly inlet to the northeast comer of Lot 1. 9. The driveway will be placed along the easterly property line of Lot 1. 10. All of the lots will drain to Lola Drive. Flow arrows are shown on the preliminary plat. The lot grading plans will be submitted with the building plans when the exact locations of the residences are known. Enclosed please two copies of the revised preliminary plat and twelve copies of the final plat. The marked up set of drawings are also enclosed. Thank you for your assistance in processing this plat. If you have any questions or need additional information please call (817)831-7711. Sincerely e:.,.é~ Ernest Hedgcoth, P .E. cc 2- preliminary plat 12- final plat 9560 FP nrh.com . CITY OF N@RTH RIC!!~~ND HILLS July 29, 1996 MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E. Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS96-19; YOUNG ADDITION; Block 1, Lot 1-3; Final Plat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on July 10, 1996. The following items are for your consideration. . 1. The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication and the surveyor's seal and signature need to be added to mylar prior to the plat being filed. 2. The triangular piece of property in the southwest corner is owned by Richland Enterprises, Inc. The developer is planning on acquiring this piece of property. Public Works prefers this triangular piece of property to be included with this plat. The developer is requesting a replat of Lot 1 when he has acquired this piece or he will dedicate by separate document ingress/egress easements across this piece to Lot 1 for a driveway approach. 3. Public Works has shown the sewer services for the lots. This will need to be added to the Utility Plan with the next submittal. 4. There is a pipeline easement on Lot 1 which needs to be shown on the next submittal with Volume and Page. 5. The Utility Easement for the 24" sanitary sewer line on Lot 2 will need to be increased to a 20 foot easement. . P.O. Box 820609 .. North Richland Hills, Texas.. 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 .. 817 -581-5521 .. FAX 817-656-7503 There are a few comments regarding the engineering and construction plans. These comments are recorded on a the preliminary plat blueline. This plan has been returned to the Engineer for revision. The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer of their responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans. The City's eventual approval of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. /f ,/,r Juli Sta JWS\pwm96100 cc: Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning & Inspection Services . . . ERNEST HEDGCOTH Consulting Engineers, Inc. PLANNING · DESIGN · ENGINEERING July 30, 1996 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 820609 North RicWand Hills, Texas 76180 Ref: PS96-19 Young Addition Block 1, Lots 1,2& 3 Final Plat Dear Sir; I have reviewed the July 29, 1996 comments concerning the Preliminary Plat for the Young Addition, Block 1, Lots 1,2 & 3. The following comments are referenced per the staff report: 1. The appropriate signatures for the owner's acknowledgement and dedication and surveyor's seal will be placed on the final mylar. 2. The triangular piece at the southwest comer is currently owned by Richland Enterprise, Inc. The easement location has been placed on the final plat. 3. The sewer services will be shown on the utility plan. Service will be from the existing 6 inch sewer line along the south property line. 4. The volume and page of the pipeline easement has been placed on the plat. 5. The utility easement along lot 2 and 3 has been shown as 20 feet. Thank you for your assistance in processing this plat. If you have any questions or need additional infonnation please call (817)831-7711. Sincerely ~~ 9560 FP nrh2.com 5701-C Midway Road Fort Worth, Texas 76117 817-831-7711 City of North Richland Hills Ni~H APPLICATION FOR A . 7301 N.E. Loop 820 - .. ----. - -, FINAL PLAT North Richland Hills. TX (PI..... print yw respa>Sðs) 817·581·5515 Proposed Subdivision Name: Youna ;4dcJ¡ I¡on Current Legal DesC(jØ6n: Ab.s/-racl ~. I~Ô~ 7;4<::.1 1:3 t.- iN. fA) WtJllace Name and Address 01 Current Property Owner: -ø-2$-a~31 Cur.f,'s ;¿~unJ Phone No. ð/ 7. ~- --. ~~i51" 7\' 4~I~&;"4- Name and Address 01 Previous Owner: (II purchased during past twelve months) 5r' Name and Address of Developer: Phone No. Se¡ me Name and Address of Engineer: J~c.. E"ne.s'/ 1-I~~c<Jih ansl//luy Er::J,n~~~ 57D/- eNI w~ R(J_I Phone No. P~/' 77/1 ¡l=r: /..L_~ 7ê->..,~ ?'/17 Type 01 Development Being Proposed: [RJ SF Residential o MF Residential o Other o Duplex Residential o Commercial' Industrial Final Plat Application Fee Calculation: 1. Application fee: $120.00 2. Number of residential lots @ $1.50 per lot: 4.50 3, Number of non·residential acres @ $5,00 per acre: 4. Number 01 st,eet intersection signs @ $65.00 each: 5. County plat ,ecording lee: ~().()O Total lee: P/&4.ðð I hereby certify that I am, 0' represent. the legal?wnef 01 the property described above and do hereby submit this Final Plat /0 the Planning and Zoning Commission fOf consideration. Dale: -'s;/ t'ø /9 (, Applicant's Phone No.: SEI- '17// Your name (Prin/ed Name): ErY)~d 4~c ð/i;, Signature: ~-<'-o¿/ 7-J. ~ Note: Please complete and submit the 'Final Plat Document Submittal Checklist· on the reverse side of this form. Ps ~lP - \q, FINAL PLAT CD - 402 (5 - 94) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 8/26/96 Subject: Civil Service Commission Recommendation to Amend Agenda Number: GN 96-81 CIvil Service Rule 11.01 (I abled at the JUly 8, HJ9ö Meeting) At the July 8, 1996, City Council meeting the Council considered a request from the Civil Service Commission (GN 96-81) to amend Civil Service Rule 11.01 which would allow appeals from reprimands. In that action City management had opposed the inclusion of reprimands as an "adverse action" under Section 11.01. Inclusion or exclusion of "reprimands" determines whether the Civil Service Commission has jurisdiction and whether an employee has the right to appeal to the Commission. Civil Service Commissioner Dennis York, representing the Commission, addressed the City Council and stated their concerns and the reason for their recommendation. The City Council referred the matter to the City Manager for further study and a recommendation. The City Manager's Office and the Human Resources Department have developed a proposed "Management Policy" that addresses these concerns and would permit any employee, Civil Service or appointed, to appeal a written reprimand to the City Manager, thus leaving reprimands as a management issue. The City Manager's Office also recommends that the Council send a recommendation back to the Civil Service Commission with the following suggested wording for amendment of Section 11.01" "A regular employee in the classified service has the right to appeal to the Civil Service Commission any adverse action taken against the employee. Adverse action is defined as action by a department head which directly results in loss of pay which includes permanent suspension, suspension without pay for any period, reduction in grade (arising from disciplinary action) and an actual pass-over for promotion. Adverse action will also include denial of reasonable accommodation to public facilities if the employee is disabled. Adverse action does not include rating procedures. Adverse action does not include reprimands." Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council take the action outlined above, thereby leaving reprimands as a management issue. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Signature CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM Finance Director Page 1 of '., CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .oepartment: Subject: Leaal Drainage System - Ratification of Ord. 1727 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: 8/26/96 GN-96-98 All ordinances establishing Utility Systems under Chapter 402 of the Government Code were validated by the legislature on June 16, 1991. Our ordinance was passed on May 13, 1991. In order to have a record of the validity of this ordinance in our own records, it is advisable to pass Ordinance No. 2137 .. which ratifies the passage of Ordinance No. 1727. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council pass Ordinance 2137. - .!.t ~ Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~~rating Budget _ ~Iher ....-. DftcIar De Page 1 of . ORDINANCE NO. 2137 AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING ORDINANCE NO. 1727; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1727 establishing a drainage system under Chapter 402 of the Local Government Code was passed on May 13, 1991; and WHEREAS, the passage of said ordinance and all ordinances in the state establishing drainage systems under said Chapter 402, which had been passed before June 16, 1991, were validated by the State Legislature in June, 1991; and WHEREAS, in order to have a record of such validation within the ordinance records of this City, the Council finds that it is necessary and desirable to pass this ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, that: 1. The passage of Ordinance No. 1727 on May 13, 1991, be, and is hereby in all . things ratified. 2. The effective date of Ordinance No. 1727 is ratified and shall be deemed to be May 13. 1991. PASSED and APPROVED this 26th day of August, 1996. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary e APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I . Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 8-22-96 Subject: Appointment to Animal Control Shelter Advisory Committee Agenda Number: GN 96-99 Place 3 on the Animal Control Shelter Advisory Committee is currently vacant. Mr. Don Sharp has been recommended for appointment to Place 3. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council take action on the proposed appointment. . Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget - rl ~er _ ~æ'a:l'I~ C·· Ovl Department Head Signature ~ Mánager CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM Page 1 of Fin...,. Director CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS epartment: Environmental Services Council Meeting Date:08/26/96 Subject:Yardwaste Reduction Partnership Project Coordinator Agenda Number: GN 96-100 After review of three contract proposals, the staff is recommending that the contract for Yardwaste Reduction Partnership Project Coordinator be awarded to Earthworks of Grapevine in the amount of $25,920. Each of the three proposals were for the same amount of money, which is dictated by the grant funding that was awarded to the four cities of North Richland Hills, Hurst, Haltom City and Richland Hills by the Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission through the North Texas Central Council of Governments. The Project Coordinator will be responsible for coordinating the Master Composter and Junior Master Composting classes as outlined in the grant as well as all publicity and promotion ofthe overall concept of yardwaste reduction through composting and recycling. In addition the Coordinator will be required to design and oversee construction of demonstration Compost Gardens in each of the four cities as well as recruit and coordinate volunteers and sponsors to help build the four sites. The Yardwaste Reduction Partnership Committee which is made up of representatives from each of the four cities, met and evaluated each of the three proposals. Two of the proposals were chosen for consideration and each was asked to make a 10 minute presentation to the committee to help in further determining the most experienced and qualified contractor. After evaluating the presentations d proposals, the committee chose Earthworks of Grapevine to receive the contract for professional services. Larry Wilhelm of Earthworks is responsible for the success of the Texas Master Composter program throughout Texas and similar programs across the country. He is also pioneering the Junior Composter program in this area of Texas. Mr. Wilhelm and Earthworks are more than qualified to administer this project which will become a model program for Texas. Earthworks is currently working on a video production for the State of Texas and plans to include our project in this production. We are excited to have Earthworks administer our project and ask that the City Council approve this contract for professional services. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the awarding of the contract for Yardwaste Reduction Partnership Project Coordinator to Earthworks. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget at Grant Funding Finance Review Acct. Number 07-05-00-4500 Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance 8/26/96 Department: Council Meeting Date: Public Hearing on Proposed Tax Rate for 1996/97 Fiscal Year Agenda Number: GN 96-101 Subject: The proposed tax rate for 1996/97 is 57¢ which is above the 3% allowed by the State to be increased without holding a public hearing. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a public hearing on the tax rate and allow public comment on this proposed rate. The notice of the public hearing has been published in accordance with State Law and it was published in the August 16, Star Telegram. The publication was a quarter page advertisement and listed the City Council members who voted in support of the tax rate and those who were not in attendance at the Council meeting when it was discussed. The hearing is advertised for 7:30 p.m., August 26. The 57¢ tax rate is 2.384¢ greater than the effective tax rate for 1996 of 54.615¢. The effective tax rate will produce approximately what the current tax rate of 57¢ will produce. This is primarily because some property values increased and we also experienced an increase in new construction. The 57¢ tax rate breaks down as follows: Interest & Sinking Fund(Debt Service) Maintenance & Operations (General Fund) 29.618¢ 27.382¢ In order to obtain the maximum input of the citizens on the proposed tax rate, it is suggested that the public hearing be opened and public comment permitted. Recommendation: Following the public hearing on the tax rate, it is recommended that Council direct staff to place an ordinance on the September 9, City Council agenda to adopt a tax rate of 57 ¢ for fiscal year 1995/96. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Department Head S;gnatu,e ~L/ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of " N Friday, AUgu5t 16, 1996/ Star·Telegram / Section B, Page ï . '. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON TAX INCREASE . The City of North Richland Hills will hold a public hearing on a I proposal to increase total tax revenues from properties on the tax roll in 1995 by 4.37 percent. Your individual taxes may increase at a greater or lesser rate, or even decrease, depending on the change in the taxable value of your property I in relation to the change in taxable value of all other property. - ! The public hearing will be held on August 26, 1996 at 7:30,' p.m. at Council Chambers, City of North Richland Hills, 7301: NE Loop 820, North Richland Hills, TX. FOR THE PROPOSAL: Garvin, Wood, Sibbet, Sansoucie, Welch, Phifer :-\ AGAINST THE PROPOSAL: None -, PRESENT and NOT VOTING: Brown ABSENT: Johnson . ¡ The statement above shows the percentage increase the proposed rate represents over the effective tax rate that the unit published on August 16, 1996. The following table compares taxes on an average home in this taxing unit last year to taxes proposed on the average home this year. Again, your individual taxes may be higher or lower, depending on the taxable value of your property. f Last Year This Year Average home value $80,762 $82,846 General exemptions available $12,114 $12,427 (amount available on the average home, not including senior citizen's or disable person's exemptions) Average taxable value $68,648 $70,419 Tax rate (per $100) 0.570000 0.570000 Tax $391.29 $401.39 Under this proposal taxes on the average home would ¡ increase by $10.10 or 2.58 percent compared with last: year's taxes. Comparing tax rates without adjusting for chànges in property value, the tax rate would increase by $0.00 per $100 of taxable value or 0.00 percent compared to last year's tax rate. These tax rate figures are not. adiusted for chanaes in the taxable value of property. . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance .Department: Pubfic Hearing on Proposed 1996/97 Budget 8/26/96 Council Meeting Date: Subject: Agenda Number: GN 96-102 The budget work session on the proposed 1996/97 budget was held August 2-4, 1996 for City Council and City Staff. At this work session, City Council reviewed the operating funds budget, the capital project funds budget, and the budgets for the Crime Control District and the Park & Recreation Development Fund. Subsequent to this session, any changes City Council has requested have been included in the 1995-96 Revised Budget and the 1996-97 Proposed Budget. The 1996-97 proposed annual operating budget for all operating funds totals $55,588,026. The General Fund budget, which is tax supported totals $20,899,784. The second largest operating fund is the Utility Fund, and its projected budget for 1996/97 is $15,868,720. The General Debt Service Fund totals $5,850,191. The proposed budget for the Aquatic Park is $2,252,090 and includes rate increases for season passes purchased after October 1, 1996. The Park and Recreation Facilities Development Fund budget is $3,733,727, and the Crime Control District's first year operating budget is $3,306,000. The 1996-97 proposed capital projects budget totals $16,557,705. . The 1996-97 Proposed Budget is based on continuing the 57¢ tax rate. The proposed budget for the Aquatic Park includes a proposed increase in the rates for season passes for both residents and non-residents. The notice of the public hearing has been published in accordance with City Charter in the August 16, Star Telegram. The proposed budget document was filed with the City Secretary's office for public viewing on August 2, 1996. In order to obtain the maximum input of the citizens on the proposed budget, it is suggested that the public hearing be opened and public comment permitted. Recommendation: Following the public hearing, it is recommended that Council reach a consensus on the proposed budget for 1996/97. An ordinånce to adopt the budget and all rate increases will be placed on the Council agenda at the September 9 City Council meeting. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ _Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Department Head Signa,",e ~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director Page 1 of . . - 1 J 1996/97 Proposed Operating Budget Ni~H· The City of Choice CITY OF N<$RTH RICHLAND HILLS . 'office of the City Manager August 26, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of North Richland Hills North Richland Hills, Texas Pursuant to the requirements of the North Richland Hills City Charter and the Civil Statutes of Texas, the budget for the 1996-97 fiscal year is herein submitted. This proposed budget is a means of presenting in financial terms the overall plans for accomplishing municipal objectives during the forthcoming year. . All operations have been carefully monitored throughout the year, and it is management's opinion that the budget requests for continued municipal operations are reasonable and realistic. The proposed budget for fiscal year 1996-97 primarily provides funding for the current level of quality services to our citizens. It also emphasizes and implements City Council priorities for new and improved services, complies with mandatory requirements of federal and state agencies, and provides maintenance and timely renovation of the City's infrastructure and facilities. The following provides an overview of the current 1995-96 fiscal year and revenues and expenditures for 1996-97. OVERVIEW OF REVISED 1995-96 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES As is part of the normal annual budget process, some areas of the 1995-96 budget require revision from their original adopted level. The more important of these revisions are explained in the following narrative. - Total General Fund revenues have been revised downward by $161,284 from the adopted level of $19,605,201 to $19,443,917 for a percentage reduction of less than one percent. Management recognized the possibility of a revenue shortfall prior to the start of the 1996- 97 annual budget process and took appropriate action with the approval of City Council by reducing overall expenditures in the General Fund by approximately one percent. This action, along with other expenditure reductions that resulted during the budget process, has resulted in a revised expenditure level of $19,406,743 which is $198,458 lower than the $19,605,201 adopted budget. P.O. Box 820609 * North RiclÍ\land Hills, Texas * 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 * 817-581-5504 * FAX 817-581-5516 . . - Current Property taxes are now budgeted higher by $100,000 and is justified by a clear pattern of strong collections for the past two years. Unfortunately, this increase in current property tax collections is offset somewhat by a $47,400 lower end of year projection for delinquent property taxes. The lower estimate has resulted from having a smaller total amount of delinquent taxes than in years past with the remaining inventory of accounts now containing a larger proportion of more difficult collection cases. The two percent of gross revenues franchise fee charged by the General Fund to the Utility Fund is revised downward by $90,000. This is a level that matches estimated revenues for the City of North Richland Hills. It is expected that some of this decline will be recovered when final year end water sales are tabulated. Actual sales thus far this fiscal year have been strong due to the exceptionally low rainfall experienced by this area. Sales tax revenues for the end of the year are also a material part of overall lower tax revenues, having been revised downward by $142,882. The revised budget target of $6,863,893 has been very carefully considered by management and is a conservative yet, realistically attainable goal. Fines and Forfeitures are the only other major category of General Fund revenue that has been revised to a significantly lower level for the current fiscal year. Procedural changes related to adopting a partial payment method of collecting court ordered judgements are the primary cause of this decline. It is anticipated by management that this is a temporary situation that will correct itself in the coming year. Close attention has and will continue to be paid to this area. With regard to expenditures, it must be noted that the one percent midyear budget reduction mentioned earlier was achieved without any noticeable service declines to the citizens of North Richland Hills. Several positions approved in the fiscal year 1995-96 budget were held open until the fiscal year 1996-97 budget year. The Public Information Officer and a part-time Finance Department position being just two examples. Other expenditure reductions were achieved through the creative and cooperative efforts of the various Department Heads in such ways that did not affect service delivery. However, during the preparations of 1995-96 revised expenditure estimates it was determined that sufficient funds were available to fund nearly all of the capital equipment requests for 1996- 97 in the current year. Therefore, $68,811 of capital equipment requests have been moved to the current year revised budget. This action serves to help maintain the tax rate at the current 57 ¢ level. 1996-97 GOALS AND PRIORITIES For the last several years the City Council has informally stated goals and priorities for the City organization to follow in providing services for the citizens of North Richland Hills. The City staff has adopted those goals and priorities in an effort to develop and implement the types and quality of services Council and citizens expect and demand. Our staff is ii . committed to providing and protecting an enhanced quality of life for our community. This will be accomplished by providing exemplary services, unconditional commitment and marked accountability. For fiscal year 1996-97 the departmental budgets have been developed using these goals and priorities: · To expand QUALITY SERVICE MANAGEMENT to the City's highest potential. (Our emphasis is to provide excellence in service to the public. We will continuously evaluate more efficient and effective ways to provide excellent public services). · To provide and plan for INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. (Our goal is to anticipate and plan for future needs through the continuous process of assessment and evaluation of infrastructure needs, high quality inspection and planning services, and implementing capital improvements to meet these needs.) . To continue the expansion and emphasis of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT activities for the City of North Richland Hills. (This objective is to protect and support the existing business base while promoting future development of the City through a comprehensive economic development plan, by continuing encouragement of growth, and a "can do" customer service approach.) . · To improve and enhance the QUALITY OF LIFE for North Richland Hills residents. (Focus will be given to the enrichment of community services, recreational services, cultural and leisure activities, and quality housing and community development.) · To continue to place emphasis on PUBLIC SAFETY issues in our community. (This goal is to continue to make our community a better place by providing responsive public services to ensure a safe, healthy community for the citizens of North Richland Hills.) · To provide ACCOUNTABILITY at aU levels of our organization. (By listening and responding to our citizens, we can strive to fulfill the community's needs and expectations with open and honest communications.) Again, these goals have been developed after listening to a consensus of Council desires, goals and visions for our community. These goals have been the basis of development of our budget and various objectives have been prepared to address each of these in each department of the City organization. 1996-97 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS AND PROGRAM OF SERVICE ENHANCEMENTS - In order to live up to the theme statement of "Our Vision, Our Future" a number of innovative, rewarding, and proactive programs based on City Council's direction regarding goals and priorities are included in the 1996-97 budget. This package of service delivery programs has been assembled by City staff with Council's most important goals in mind iii . at all times, as described earlier in this letter. Several of the highest profile service enhancements and new programs are described in the following narrative. Fire Service Improvements - With this budget, the City will complete the third phase of a three-part plan to increase the number of Fire Fighters responding to a fire alarm. At a total cost of $137,120 our citizens will benefit through more effective firefighting while at the same time the safety level of firefighters at the scene will also be heightened. Two firefighters and their related equipment will be added effective October 1 for a full year cost of $78,354 and three additional firefighters will be hired in April 1997 for a six month cost of $58,766. These staff additions will bring the Fire Department closer to the goal of staffing all front line fire apparatus with a minimum of three firefighters at all times. By hiring fully certified personnel these new employees will be on duty within a few weeks of their hiring. Continuing S~p'port for Street Maintenance - The fifth consecutive year of major funding for the street overlay program will see $350,000 devoted to this highly visible program. Citizens can expect to see 17 lane miles of public roads restored to first class condition through the use of the overlay process. . ImDroved Public Information Program - A Public Information Officer was originally included in the current year budget, but delayed due to midyear belt tightening. This staff addition, which is funded for a partial year at $40,000, will help the City better communicate our official message to current and prospective private and corporate citizens alike. Expansion of the City's Internal Audit Program - As any City grows, so must the support staff that is an integral part of the behind the scenes effort that supports direct public service areas. The City's outside independent audit firm has for the past two years recommended this particular addition to the Finance Department staff in order to strengthen the limited internal audit function currently being performed on a part-time basis by the Finance Department. A full time Internal Auditor will be able to focus on specific areas of need following an annual audit plan approved by City Management. This position will cost $46,000, including salary and equipment and is slated to be funded on a 50/50 basis through the General Fund and the Water and Sewer Fund beginning October 1996. Performance, operational, and financial control audits would be performed in order to ensure the most efficient, effective, and ethical methods of operation are employed by the City. - Strengthening of the Risk Management Function - The addition of a professional Risk Manager is another support function that becomes more and more essential as a City matures and grows in the level of services it provides. Funded to start in January 1997 with $66,600 of funds from the Insurance Fund, this position will be responsible for all aspects of the City's insurance concerns and will endeavor to minimize the City's exposure to potential loss and liability through the strengthening of existing safety programs, training, iv . and job site inspections. Funding includes salary, office furniture, computer equipment and a vehicle. Increase Library Services - Library patrons will benefit from an expansion of operating hours on Wednesday nights. This $20,000 enhancement will increase the hours of two clerical positions in the Technical Services Circulation Department from 20 to 40 hours per week. Opening orthe Tennis Center- A cooperative joint venture with BISD will come to fruition with the anticipated January opening of the Tennis Center adjacent to Richland High School. Many of our citizens and high school students will soon derive many hours of healthful athletic recreation from this center. Funding for $243,000 of inventory, staffing, and other operational costs has been included in the Park & Recreation Facilities Development Fund budget. . Expanded Park Maintenance - The park maintenance function is being augmented with the addition of two maintenance crew leaders and a vehicle for their use. This maintenance addition is budgeted at $85,000 in the next year. These two crew leaders will enable the City to properly maintain recently constructed parks, multi-use trails and associated acreage, the new Tennis Center, and athletic fields. These two supervisory positions are needed to ensure a proper level of control and direction is provided to the greater number of maintenance workers employed to maintain our expanding number of facilities and acreage. Funding is proposed from the Park and Recreation Sales Tax Fund. ExPanded Public Safety Operations - This is probably one of the most exciting and by far the largest service improvements provided for the citizens of North Richland Hills in this budget. As a result of the %¢ sales tax approved by the voters, the City has budgeted $3,306,000 to supplement the capabilities of the City's Police Department. Included with this major project will be the addition of 25 employees, 9 vehicles, and a full replacement of existing computer hardware and software. The primary goals of this enhancement are to reduce response time, reduce the occurrence of call stacking, increase officer visibility, update the Police Department's crime fighting technology and combat gang related criminal activity. Staffing additions include eleven uniformed officers, one school resource officer, one property technician, five public service officers, two clerks, four detention officers and one crime analyst. Because of the very real possibility that funding for these additions may not be reaffirmed at the polls in five years, management is proposing to reserve $935,450 as a transition fund to avoid any negative impact that may then occur. The eventual goal of a five million dollar reserve is part of the long range plan for the transition fund. - Refinements to the City's Merit Based Pav and Classification Plan - After a very thorough and carefully analysis of various alternatives, management is recommending that Council adopt as part of its compensation policy a refinement that calls for merit based salary increases at set intervals during an employee's tenure with the City. This concept was v . . It presented to Council at a separate work session on July 16, 1996 and will be discussed further in this letter. Support of Alliance for Children's Advocacv Center - Funded through the use of the %¢ Crime Control and Prevention Tax at a level of 20¢ per capita, this program will receive $10,130 in the next budget year. This program reaches out with assistance to at risk children in the Northeast Tarrant County Community. PROPOSED 1996-97 OPERATING BUDGET The proposed 1996-97 budget is divided into several components. The first section is the General Fund, which consists of the tax supported operations of the City. The second is the Enterprise Funds, which includes the water, sewer. golf course, and water park operations. The Internal Service Funds are next and include departments that provide services to other City departments: Vehicle Maintenance, Building Services, Self- Insurance, and Information Services. The Special Revenue Funds are included in the next section and include the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Fund and the Promotional/Economic Development Fund. Other Miscellaneous Funds are also included. GENERAL FUND General Fund Revenue Changes from FY96 to FY97 A. PrQjected Revenues for 1996-97 I $ Hundred Thousands Revenues for next fiscal year are projected at $20.899.784, an increase of seven and a half percent or $1,359,786 above the estimated levels for the Revised 1995-96 Budget. As in the immediate past year, the bulk of this increase is from increased valuations of existing property, additions to the City's property base, and the generally robust level of retail sales activity. Miscellaneous Intergovernmental Charges for Services licenses & Permüs Fines & Forfeitures Franchise Fees Sales Tax Property Taxes $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 A summary of anticipated significant revenue increases / (decreases) by major category for fiscal year 1996-97 follows: (as is charted above) · Property Taxes $336,809 up 6.9% · Sales Taxes $343,194 up 5.0% vi . · Franchise Taxes $55,000 up 2:3% · Fines and Forfeitures $25,400 up 3.5% · Licenses and Permits $12,100 up 1.2% · Charges for Services $30,596 up 2.9% · Intergovernmental' $645,844 up 43.4% · Miscellaneous Revenue $7,014 up 1.8% The above described revenues for FY96-97 result in a seven percent total increase of $1,359,786 to the General Fund above the Revised Estimates for FY95-96. The Tarrant Appraisal District has certified total taxable property values for 1996 at $1,729,500,273 which represents a five and eight tenths percent increase over 1995 values. Of this increase, two percent is from new construction and three and eight tenths percent is from increased valuation of existing property. The City is also entering its fourth mutually successful year of tax collection services through a contract with the Tarrant County Tax Assessor's office. . The forecast for Sales Tax deserves a special note to convey to Council the extreme level of caution and conservatism upon which the 1996-97 estimate is based. The five percent increase that is forecasted is by far the smallest percentage increase projected for the past several years (9.5% in FY96 and 10.0% in FY95) and is even lower that the State Comptroller's official estimate of five and nine tenths percent for the State. This is because of continuing concerns about the impact of the IH820 interchange construction and reflects national retail sales information that gives rise to a cautious attitude. - The only remaining material and truly significant increase in revenues for the General Fund lies in the two Intergovernmental transfers from the Crime Control and Prevention District (CCD) Fund to pay for $352,000 of indirect costs incurred by the General Fund in support of this major new activity and $282,071 to fund salary increases of police personnel presently employed by the City. An additional expenditure offset of $64,540 is shown on page two of Schedule 3 (Summary of Expenditures). This amount represents all of the non-salary accounts in the General Fund Police budget that have increased above the revised budget for FY95-96. Shown on Schedule 3 for illustrative purposes, this amount of budgeted expenditures will be transferred from the General Fund budget to the CCD budget before Council approves the final budget proposal. These three important amounts represent the fulfillment of management's commitment to Council, and the public, that if passed, the % ¢ sales tax for the CCD would be used vii . . - . to offset any and all increases to the General Fund Police Department budget during the life of the tax. Other general categories of revenue are forecasted to continue in the next year without any significant changes. In all cases, management has tried to apply the proper level of conservatism and caution that is prudent and necessary to the process of estimating revenues. B. Proposed Expenditures The proposed General Fund Budget for next fiscal year is one which maintains the current level of service with the exception of service improvements that have already been described earlier in this letter. The proposed budget is based upon maintaining the current tax rate of 57¢ per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation for the fourth consecutive year. The total proposed budget is recommended at $20,838,703, which represents a seven and three tenths percent increase of $1 ,431 ,960 above the revised 1995-96 budget. Please note that this seven percent increase in expenditures matches the corresponding increase in General Fund revenues described earlier in this letter. Another special aspect that should be considered when considering the level of increase from one year to the next is that approximately $337,740 of the increase is directly related to restoring funding to the 1996-97 budget that had been cut from the original 1995-96 adopted budget. The following table is a listing of material budget increases for the General Fund. Salaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Overtime ............. Part-timelTemporary . . . . TMRS (retirement) . . . . . . FiCA............... . 5 Additional Firefighters . Expanded Library Hours . Internal Auditor ........ Operating Supplies ..... Maintenance .......... General Services . . . . . . . Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Certification Training . . . . Bad Debt Expense ..... 582,150 31,829 53,368 225,408 12,086 137,120 20,000 23,000 (Total cost is $46,000, remaining half is being funded in the Utility Fund) (Resulting increase) from a %% rate 166,252 184,132 135,609 26,706 52,555 (Public Safety related) 5,000 viii . . - Note that $282,071 of the salary increase is Police related and is being funded completely by the Crime Control District as are all other Police Department increases in the General Fund which amount to $64,540. C. City Council Contingency Reserve Recognizing the reality that a budget at best can only try to anticipate the many needs that may occur in the upcoming year, the Council Contingency Reserve continues to be funded at a level comparable to the past several years. Budgeted at $114,891 for 1996-97 this amount is set aside for use at Council's discretion for special requirements that may occur. D. Debt Service Requirements The debt service portion of the tax rate is the amount required to meet principal and interest payments on outstanding General Obligation Bonds and Certificates of Obligation. Total General Debt Service expenditures for 1996-97 are $5,886,622 which is a 10.6% increase of $566,596 over the current year. This increase can be broken out by $477,595 that represents the first year of debt service for the 1996 issue of debt with the remaining increase being related to debt service estimated for equipment purchases that are described in the Capital Improvement Projects budget. The revised budget for the General Debt Service Fund is lower from the adopted level by $551,874 due to an accounting procedural change. The amount moved represented the annual debt service for the Golf Course Enterprise Fund and it is now accounted for in that fund. More detailed information on debt service can be found in the Debt Service Fund section of the proposed budget document along with charts that visually communicate the City's debt service requirements through the year 2016. E. Ending Balance for 1995-96 The proposed ending balance estimated for the General Fund at September 30, 1997 is set at $61,081. This represents an amount that could be used at the discretion of City Councilor left as is to act as a minimal safety net in the event that the City experiences a minor shortfall in revenues next year or if an unexpected expenditure becomes necessary. ENTERPRISE FUNDS A. Utility Fund - Water and Sewer The Water and Sewer Utility Fund is projected to have a September 30, 1997 ending fund balance of $74,633 which is comparable to the revised ending fund balance of $116,832 that is projected for the end of the current fiscal year. While both revenues ix . and expenditures are generally in line with past historical trends, it is difficult to draw straightforward comparisons of projected revenues and expenditures to current year revised numbers because of the upcoming sale of the Watauga portion of the system. Significant reductions have therefore occurred in both revenues and expenditures for this fund. Revenues have been reduced by a net total of $2,834,030 and expenditures have been reduced by a net total of $3,624,226 for a net change of $790,1 96. A major portion of the expenditure reduction is related to a greatly reduced level of debt service for this fund. The $9.2 million of proceeds from the system sale will be used per the advice of the City's financial advisory firm, First Southwest, to the city's best advantage to retire a large portion debt. This will reduce the annual debt service requirement for the next year from $2,074,783 to $664,000. . Immediately after the sale agreement was reached, management devoted a great deal of time to further analyze the long-term impact of this major change in operations and has reasonable expectations that North Richland Hills water and sewer customers will not be adversely impacted by the sale. At the same time, it is also anticipated that the water and sewer fund will remain a financially soluble enterprise for the next several years and not have to use up reserve funds or postpone needed capital improvements to the system. To this end, management strongly recommends that a specific reserve be established within the water and sewer fund to help achieve this goal. For the first year beginning with 1996-97, it is recommended that $300,000 be set aside as a "Rate Stabilization Reserve." This reserve should continue to be accumulated on an annual basis until at least the end of the 1998-99 fiscal year. At this time, final separation of the system would be accomplished in accordance with the terms of the sale agreement. Other material items that are affected the 1996-97 budget for the water and sewer fund include: Increased Water Purchase Costs $378,000 Increased Sewer Service Costs $200,000 Salary Adjustments $113,789 Electricity Costs $ 15,000 B. Aquatic Park Enterprise Fund - The third year of operations for the Aquatic Park has a budget of $2,252,090 projected for 1996-97. This is a seven and six tenths percent decrease of $184,064 when compared to the current revised budget of $2,436,154. The reason for this decrease is related to the use of $502,814 in the 1995-96 budget for Capital Improvements primarily related to construction of the new tube slide attraction. Adjusting for this item, the budget has actually increased by 16.4% or $318,750. x . This budget has been balanced on the premise that Council will continue to recognize the sound management policy that it is necessary to annually reserve an adequate amount of funding for future capital improvements. Therefore, an amount of $325,000 has been set aside for this purpose. This is an amount comparable to what has been set aside in the past two years. When all other expenditures were considered it became necessary for management to propose a rate increase in order to eliminate an estimated revenue shortfall of approximately $150,000. After careful consideration of the possible alternatives, market issues, and past revenue trends, the following increases are recommended to Council. Current Proposed Rates Increases Resident - Daily Adult $4.95 None Child 3-11 3.95 None Under 3 Free Non-Resident - Daily Adult $9.95 None Child 3-11 $7.95 None . Under 3 Free Resident Season Pass Adult $49.95 $10.00 Child 3-11 $39.95 $10.00 Family (up to 4 people) $129.95 $20.00 Non-Resident Season Pass Adult $69.95 $20.00 Child 3-11 $49.95 $20.00 Family (up to 4 people) $189.95 $40.00 The above rate increases will still allow the Aquatic Park to be below competitive rates for the other national water theme park in the area yet are sufficient to generate the needed additional revenue to balance the budget. The budget as presented to Council assumes that a rate increase of some sort will be approved. Management is prepared to assist Council consider alternative options as needed. - xi . . - INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS A. Support Services Fund The Support Services Fund consists of the Building' and Vehicle Maintenance Departments. This fund is an Internal Service Fund and as such, allocates its cost to the user departments of the General, Utility, and other funds. The proposed budget for 1996-97 for both Equipment Services and Building Services is $2,835,083, which is a six percent decrease from the previous year. The decrease is a result of fewer pieces of equipment being replaced. It does provide allocating $102,114 in funds form the Capital Projects Reserve from Building Services to provide various types of heating and air-conditioning system changes, floor covering, and heavy maintenance, and other renovations for municipal facilities. It is also recommended that the City continue providing reserves for building improvements for the future as well as setting aside the vehicle services replacement funds, as recommended by the Peat Marwick study. No additional personnel or other service enhancements are recommended for the Support Services Fund. B. Self-Insurance Fund The Self-Insurance Fund proposed budget for 1996-97 is $3,255,482, which is a four and one-half percent increase over 1995-96. Since this is also an Internal Service Fund, insurance costs are charged to other funds of the City. Employee dependent insurance payments are also included in the revenues. One of the major objectives for 1996-97 is to continue building reserves for future insurance claims. In the past few years the City experienced some extraordinary medical claims and had to use reserves to cover costs. We need to continue to restore reserves to an adequate level. In 1996-97 it is proposed that $156,302 be added to this reserve. The 1996-97 proposed budget includes an enhancement to this fund of a Risk Manager position in January 1997. This position is to be responsible for all aspects of the City's insurance concerns and will minimize the City's exposure to loss and liability. xii . . - C. Information Services Fund The Information Services Fund consists of both telecommunications and computer services operations. This fund is also an Internal Services Fund and allocates costs to user departments of the General, Utility, and other City Funds. The proposed budget for Information Services for 1996-97 is $1,418,734. The expenditures are divided into a number of activities to facilitate cost accounting of each one of these services. No service enhancements are proposed for the Information Services Fund in 1996-97. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND The 1996-97 fiscal year will be the fourth full year of operation of the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Fund. The proposed budget is $3,629,727. Projected revenues from sales tax are based on the same conservative estimates used for the General Fund. The major cost increase in this fund is the addition of the Tennis Center which is to open in January 1997. The proposed budget of $243,000 includes one full-time Tennis Manager, and 21 part-time personnel. The part-time personnel consist of tennis pro's, tennis instructors, maintenance staff, and office staff. Other expenditures for the Tennis Center include merchandise and food supplies, electric costs, and maintenance. The revenue projection for the first year of operation is $91,727. The Reserve for Capital Projects items in this budget, accumulates funds from sales taxes to be transferred to the Capital Projects Fund. These funds are included in the five year Capital Improvements Program as specific projects and are reviewed and approved by City Council. The Capital Projects will be discussed in a separate section of the budget. One program enhancement is recommended for the Park and Recreation Development Fund in order to continue adequately maintaining new and existing park land that is being acquired and developed during this next fiscal year. This service enhancement was discussed previously in this letter. To recap, the recommendation is: . Two Crew leaders to maintain effective personnel distribution and work supervision on park and recreational facilities $65,000 . One Pickup for support of increased staff $20,000 If these service enhancements are approved by City Council, sufficient funds will still be available to finance the capital projects from cash reserves that have been proposed in the five year Capital Improvements Program for park and recreation facilities. xiii . . - CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT In February 1996 the Citizens of North Richland Hills voted to approve the half-cent sales tax increase to establish a Crime Control and Prevention District for a period of five years. This district is governed by a seven member Board of Directors. The one-half cent sales tax funds are earmarked exclusively for "statute defined" crime control projects and programs. The sales tax was effective July 1, 1996. A transition fund has been established to reserve funds for the continuation of the programs and services if a continuation referendum is not passed at the end of the five year period. The revised budget for 1995/96 is $794,236, and the 1996/97 proposed budget amounts to $3,306,000. PROMOTIONAL / ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND The purpose of the Promotional/ Economic Development Fund is to promote tourism and attract new industry to the City of North Richland Hills. The Promotional/Economic Development Fund received the HoteVMotel Occupancy Tax collected by all motels in the City. Revenues are budgeted at $285,345 for fiscal year 1996-97. This is an increase of approximately $14,000 over the 1995-96 revised revenues of$271,251. The expenditures are budgeted at $284,094 for fiscal year 1996-97 leaving a positive balance of $1,251. No appropriations are allocated from fund balance which is a change from previous years. MISCELLANEOUS FUNDS Several other funds are included in the detailed information of the budget document; these include the Donations Fund, Special Investigations Fund and the Drainage/Utility Fund. Each of these is important, but they do not contain budgetary amounts of a material nature in respect to the major funds that have been reviewed in this letter. Management is prepared to review any of these other funds at the direction of Council. PERSONNEL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS FOR 1996-97 This budget contains further refinements to the compensation plan that the City adopted several years ago in 1993 when a study was performed the Ralph Anderson Consulting firm. As a continuation of that process management is offering these recommendations with the intent of achieving the following specific goals that have been developed in conjunction with the desires of the City Council: 1. Maintain an adequate salary for different occupations that will be competitive with the area market and thereby attract the very best employees in the first place 2. Reduce employee turnover xiv . . - 3. Be fair and equitable to employees performing the same duties and having approximately the same level of experience and skills 4. Create and maintain a compensation plan that is fiscally responsible that the City can afford To achieve the above goals, the following major components are part of the proposed compensation plan that is recommended to Council. Adjustments for Public Safety Positions - In order to maintain a competitiveness and attract and retain capable Fire and Police personnel, significant salary range adjustments are proposed to be implemented in October 1996 according to time in grade. Establishment of a Step System for Public Safety and Other Civil Service Classifications - The use of specific steps is a common part of many municipal pay plans that instills a sense of order to the overall system and aids in communicating to the entire work force an understanding that there is an established career progression path that they will be able to proceed upon if they perform their duties in a satisfactory manner. This plan creates ordered steps from entry level to maximum level that allow for this progression to occur generally on an annual basis. A separate step table has been created for several General Municipal Employee classifications and for all Public Safety classifications, except the Department Heads. This topic was presented to Council at a workshop in July for advance consideration and input to management. Continuation of a Merit Pay System - In close conjunction with the Step System, the continuation of a merit based pay system would be the key to allowing an employee to advance from one step level to a higher one in the step system. If an employee's performance were marginal and they were held back from advancement in a particular year, there would be no catching up in later years. The budget as presented to Council contains funding based on an average merit increase of four percent. Market Adjustments to Maintain Compensation Plan - In the past, salary survey information has traditionally been gathered in the summer months of each year when other cities are in the process of developing their budgets. This has sometimes resulted in basing our assumptions on information that may have been altered in substantial ways before it was adopted by the other area cities. Management is proposing that a new cycle be established for this process. By gathering the market survey information after September 30 of each year, the process of determining the appropriate adjustment will become much more accurate and in-line with our local competitors for quality employees. Incorporated as an integral part of the Market Adjustment analysis, would be a determination of the proper amount of increase necessary for area inflation. In the past this has simply been referred to as the Cost of Living increase or COLA. The budget as presented to Council contains funding sufficient for a two percent Market Adjustment for General Municipal Employee classifications for January 1997. Market Adjustments do not include Public Safety classifications as Market Adjustments were already considered in the major adjustments to their salary adjustments mentioned previously. However, in future years such adjustments will be considered in January for all classifications. xv . . - PROPOSED FINANCING FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 Management has adopted a more cautious attitude with regard to the projection of variable revenue sources that may be affected by general economic trends or local phenomena such as the continuing construction activity at the IH820 interchange project. Nonetheless, we are still very optimistic about the future and are confident that the budget presented herein is based on reasonable data that has been carefully examined at several phases during budget preparation process. Our community continues to experience moderate economic and population growth that is in keeping with or ahead of general trends in the Northeast Tarrant County area. The level of services provided by the funding in this budget will allow us to continue to progress toward the accomplishment of Council goals and priorities. At the same time, we will also be able to continue performing the vital stewardship role of maintaining the quality infrastructure that we have created in the past. The proposed financing for 1996-97 is based on maintaining the current tax rate of 57 ¢ per $100 of taxable property value. Some possible rate increases at the Aquatic Park have been discussed earlier in this letter and will need to be acted upon by the Council. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION This plan of services is the end result of several months of the coordinated efforts of a great many key personnel who are part of the City staff. It has its beginnings with the input of various managers and staff at the front lines of our operations who are closest to the challenges faced on a daily basis to provide quality service to our citizens. This information is collected, examined, refined and then submitted by the various Department Heads to the Budget Office. The Budget Office staff then has the immense task of fitting all the pieces together in a coherent manner that can be understood and reviewed in summary and detail fashion by City Management. They have all done a superlative job this year as I knew they would and I am grateful for their hard work and dedication. I also wish to thank Council for their exceptional efforts to communicate to management their priorities and vision for the future of our wonderful city. It is offered in the hope that it is an accurate reflection of Council's direction in every respect and will serve as a road map leading us on to another successful year for the City of North Richland Hills. Respectfully submitted, ~¿; ~~L-~ C.A. Sanford City Manager CAS/po xvi · FISCAL YEAR 1996-91 SCHEDULE 1 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES " GENERAL FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 REVENUES Taxes Fines & Forfeitures Licenses & Permits Charges for Service Intergovernmental Miscellaneous $12,720,580 $14,395,000 $14,953,077 $14,779,095 775,654 747,463 829,500 732,300 1,019,970 856,824 957,299 996,499 991,083 907,205 1,046,741 1,066,656 1,585,000 1,399,526 1,488,517 1,488,517 415,773 342,795 330,067 380,850 $17,508,060 $18,648,813 $19,605,201 $19,443.917 TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES · City Council City Manager Public Information City Secretary Legal Human Resources Finance Citicable MIS Municipal Court Planning/Inspections Library Environmental Services Public Works Parks & Recreation Police Fire Building Services Non-Departmental Service Enhancements $72,890 $74,354 $100,000 $100,000 299,360 355,123 348,359 353,580 0 0 40,000 0 262,208 280,309 328,847 325,618 123,596 124,896 146,496 147.573 34,289 35,105 50,207 53.112 488,312 502,606 587,160 589,668 136,669 143,526 162,701 169,833 379,136 385,081 0 0 468,510 473,843 578,755 584,677 534,527 557,294 665,833 598.942 766,442 798,277 910,884 903,537 467.591 479,397 566,909 565,257 1,773,534 1,928,182 2,159,785 2,143,016 1,278,043 1,188,624 1,431,159 1,438,118 4,915,556 5,324,477 5,982,416 5,941,154 3,459,804 3,835,606 4,325,941 4,312,427 587,500 579,504 579,504 579,504 1,460,093 1,384,504 640,245 600,727 0 0 0 0 $17,508,060 $18,450,708 $19,605,201 $19,406,743 $0 $198,105 $0 $37,174 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- TOT Al.EXPENDITURES BALANCE · PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 ::$1'5"'514~'öõä': :~;::;}:}::l:··· .:.;.:.:.:.<;~,....;:,. ",-" ';; .... ··..'757700· . ......... .. E'll .' ......... -. .',' -....,... :',~~g;;ª:~!.;zli:¡ .'............'-,................................", ,", imJ:i;:;:;~j(tt~t;&i~;::I~¡~t~ f:!J;;,~I~!~~I¡~ri'i:~i t.!~g;:~~~:~~~B:~:: Irlt)' ---------- --------- >.;;.::;;:...;.;,;.....:.;«.:;;;>.:;;;.~::;.::;~...;.;.:':.: ·Speclal Note: The $282,071 increase from FY96 Revised Budget to FY97 Proposed Budget in the Police Department is completely offset by a corresponding Intergovernmental revenue transfer from the CCD fund in FY97. - 3 - FISCAL YEAR 1996-97' SCHEDULE 2 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ES Current Property Taxes Delinquent Property Taxes Penalty and Interest Franchise Fees Utility Fund Franchise Taxes Sales Taxes Mixed Beverages Payment in Lieu of Taxes $4.018.962 112.403 51,460 2.223,092 315,887 5.748.869 83,467 166.440 GENERAL FUND ACTUAL FY 1994/95 $4,464,752 103.864 68.883 2,576,331 329,419 6,569,755 94.694 187,302 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 $4.682.362 122,400 53.040 2,450.000 355,000 7.006.775 83,500 200,000 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 $4.782,362 75.000 53,040 2,441.000 265,000 6,863,893 94,000 204,800 PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 .¡¡¡j!:i~:S',~·~~·:ðÓ~::!: ,::','::;::,::.,:::,'. '4"8'''''''0' ..·0.."0..":" ............'............. . t~~~~t)::;;}:~:·..· ." . .'. ," ....'..;. .;:: ¡!,':¡I;'..:jt·~~t:~,~ø;i¡ ·':";',:":::·t,~:~g~:~~ð:;:¡ . - . . . .. . - -...' . . ;::,::¡i{::,::20S,,99Þ) ::,::::~.;.::::.::.,..,7' ,;:: ;::~: -:';:, ::;:,-;;:" :::: TOTAL TAXES . . .... "',', - .- '." ....... $12,720,580 $14.395.000 $14,953,077 $14.779.095::~1~.5~4,O:º,~..; Municipal Court Fines Library Fines arrant Fees $608,094 42.864 124.696 TOTAL FINES AND FORFEITURES $775.654 $580.510 42.695 124.258 $747,463 $634,500 45.000 150.000 $829,500 Miscellaneous Permits $141.444 $123,927 $121,000 Building Permits 435,865 300,706 367,000 Electrical Permits 73.381 56,130 66,000 Plumbing Permits 36.980 44.177 34,000 Curb & Drainage Insp. Fees 31,777 39,882 35,000 Re-Inspection Fees 3,974 3,557 3,500 License Fees 9,600 9,685 9,000 Ëontractor Registration Fees 65,705 62.315 60,000 nimal License/Adoption Fees 18.705 17,914 24,500 nimal Control Impoundment 38.312 37,464 41,500 Crematorium Revenues 2.010 1.434 2,000 uto Impoundment Fees 88,493 89.443 102,000 Food Service Permits 56,148 55.170 48,000 Food M"anagers School 8,965 10,010 10,500 Fire Inspection Fees 8,611 5,010 8,000 Publicity Fees - Recreation 0 0 25,299 TOTAL LICENSES! PERMITS $1,019.970 $856.824 $957,299 -4- $564,300 45.000 123,000 tiii~f;t~:~~/~tr;::i:i;i~f.~ ......- .", ..... '-" ".' ,,' . ..' ........ . . . . . . . .. . ........ . ..... . .... . . . .... .. ~i:~::::!:=$5êt9ôd'j t':;?i::\<:45,BOO ::: i?\};?:.130,OOO} .:"-::'.: .;-.,: .". ....-:: ".- ~ ..." . .- ", .. -' .'.:~.: " .....;......-..-..... .. , ... .. $732.300 }i:'+:$757~70?:1 .. $129.000 390,000 55.500 56,000 35.000 3,500 9.000 58,000 20,700 46.000 2,000 102,000 48.000 10.500 6.000 25.299 .- ..... , , :; .. ,~~:.~:.:.::.\(~~::~:: , ,- .......... ," .',': ;..; ;'~:'.':: i~:'j!::ii'.:;~ 132.00C);! W}){:,::400,OOO,.; li:,::i~¡!,¡.;·;,;.'· ;~:ggg'J it;?uâ:::,:35.00Qi ·~¡;;i¡;~;;:(.. ,:~< ~15Q'O) ~l:~U~~¡ ,....'.' .'. 46 000 " ·\i\{J·:);· . ..' -.. ."..:) ,.:,:,:. :,1.5()0. iitv·1 ~~:~~~j "("".., 2~:~~Ø,¡ ,-... . .- "" ,- ... '" $996 .499:',~j .008,59Q: .. , .......... . "........ . FISCAL YEAR 1996-97' SCHEDULE 2 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES GENERAL FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 . Park Facility Rental $4,575 $3,226 $3,500 $4,500 bulance Fees 372,882 193.015 300,000 300.000 Garbage Billing 209.574 291,540 290,000 290.000 Maps & Codes 359 1,176 1,500 1,200 Recreation Fees 158,509 197,217 195,650 195,650 thletic Revenue 82,627 82,800 91.000 84,400 Recreation Special Events 0 0 36,051 55,306 Planning & Zoning Fees 17,832 16,424 16,000 22,000 Sale of Accident Reports 22,798 26,432 24,500 21,000 ltal Statistics 24,280 24,253 22,940 26.000 Mowing 51,160 24,061 25,000 24,000 Non-Resident Library Fees 15,961 16,221 17,500 16.000 Citicable Sponsorships 3,565 2,620 2,000 0 Ideo Services Income 16,247 16,534 10,000 12,000 Ideo Tape Sales 4.314 2,886 1,500 5,000 SBMS Transmitter Lease 6,400 8,800 9,600 9,600 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE $991,083 $907,205 $1,046,741 $1,066,656 INTERGOVERNMENTAL Indirect Costs - General crp $210,000 $210,000 $210,000 $210,000 Indirect Costs - Utility Fund 1,025,000 1,025,000 1,025,000 1,025,000 Indirect Costs - Park & Rec.Corp. 350,000 164,526 180,882 180,882 Indirect Costs - CCD 0 0 0 0 Indirect Costs - NRH20 Fund 0 0 72,635 72,635 Direct Cost - General Fund Police Department Salaries 0 0 0 0 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL $1,585,000 $1,399,526 $1,488,517 $1,488,517 Grant Proceeds-Crim. Justice $36,140 $48,496 $56,806 $56,806 Interest Income 132,011 241,393 205,000 186,000 Sale of City Property 32,610 178 0 20,241 Other Income 27,683 26,529 20,100 47,642 Spons9rships - T ASP 0 14,742 30,000 12,000 ppropriation - Fund Balance 187,329 0 0 0 ransfer from Donations-Park 0 0 18,161 18,161 Overtime Reimbursements 0 11,457 0 40,000 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS $415,773 $342,795 $330,067 $380,850 TOTAL REVENUES $17,508,060 $18,648,813 $19,605,201 $19,443,917 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -5- ~ PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 I~I~ "'.';'....,,,,195 650.. @i@:~i:¡¡:':::t::I:5; qOO:¡ ~:~;i!;;:~;¡l\::::i¡~!~;;~~.22:,¡ =;:;::;;·::;;;;)~::;::\;:;:.;·r~ i:;:;,;:.=!):;j .......-...-............... .... !,¡i::~:j'!;º-~'?;~~~:..¡ )';'. ,~.'.:.' .;.;:....;. :.:. ,.;. -', ;.: - ù····. ," .:...:.'.: . , . , . ~i~~it~~%!~~~~r%~~~~:¡~~:~~¡~~ ~::ii;j·¡:i¡1i;~~~:~,~.g,J ,.., '....·192 655' :~:~{t{{<.... .-,.... j . :t~{?it:,t~2,0Z1.: ....." ?:t~~~~~:!:~~?f:::.:~t\r:~f:/? 1,.!I~:;,j:~,:;.&~:;! .................. ...... .... .... ..-....... ".... ....... -.... . ...... ... .,", ;:;:::;:~?~:~!;~:~~:i~;~:;@~f::Ç.¡:f~:::~;:~:i ;:':'¡:::i'}l'%iq:Vt(:::¡,:: :':',:II:¡::¡:,ffi~§J:~l:¡ 1:tt:ti:?52.PPO:i IIJ ::i:,¡·..,:'::;~~~,7;ê64"; . , i$2ô'::S99'784':' ~Z~:±22~~~::i:: ~~~.~~."':'----:-.~.:: :.:.:.;.;.;.;.:.:.;.;.;.;.;.;.:.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.:.;.;.;.;.;.;.: Mayor and Council City Manager Public Information City Secretary Administration Public Information Record Retention Total City Secretary Legal Human Resources Finance Accounting & Administration Purchasing Tax Budget Total Finance Citicable MIS(TelecomlData Processing) Municipal Court Administration Clerical Warrants Teen Court Judicial Total Municipal Court Planning 1 Inspection Services Inspections Planning Total Planning 1 Inspections FISCAL YEAR 1996-97" SCHEDULE 3 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND ADOPTED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 $72,890 $74,354 $100,000 $299,360 $355,123 $348,359 $0 $0 $40,000 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 II PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 $1 00,000 'i:;;:..::,:~'~R~/9~.r' . . . . - , .. . .. -.... ....... ......................... ...., ".... ...-,.. -.... ... $353,580::i:::,·:!?$,~~?:~r:?~,!: '. ...... ... ....... $O:!;,:,:::::,:,:~p,qpo:: ,-,.. . ,".... :,:.::;. ::: -. :: '::;. ;'.::::;':'.; .~.:.:.~. .: - :-:'." . .:. ......, . ,- ............ :;:;:::;':;;;::;:;.:<-;;::;:;'":;:::;:;:;.;:::::;':":::';:.:;: ." ....... ....'.,. ...,... ,- . .......-..'.'.............-...-.....-..............-.. ........_ ...d .....,..... · .... . .... ......... .... '," ¡i:iti:::,..J5!,~4.1.n ·!!I¡·I·¡j¡.i,ji1!j!i:iJ~;~~l!. . . . . . . ,. . . , . . ... . .. . . " . . .... . .;.:.:.:.:-:........;...,..;..(.-:.:.:..-::-::... M!=R$3f1;~q1·..\ · ..,.. . .. '... ..,. · . . - . . . . .........,'.. .." "'....... · .. {%¡§$14!~;622',i r::?::::" . '.' :::;~.::(.:;.:..>;)..:~ .. ... . . .. .. .. . . . .' .. ... ,- , .". . .. ¡;'::,:.:::.,;~5~~~?.~ : , , . ..... . ",.",..... .;...;...:.:-.......;.................. <......:.. .;...:.;.:-::.......:.........:',.;.-;;... ::.:\~:;.,:..:..;.-;>.:«.::..:,..::... ,", ~·1);;:;:::;0;::~~~: ~~.~.:! :1;1¡;~!i.;:!i!Œ~;:~~ø..;! :1;;:¡i:.",:~.~~~·~~.~i:: ·:i:¡,::=;;'..::~J.,t1.:,i~5,·.i, .. .... ,.. - - . .. . i::::}/:,'è:;;h\':':·'~o. : :;;';",::::,';:;.-.-..:.-::.,.:;';;.." .... ... ..... '.,'. ". .. .. ....-.-.... .. ., . ..... .. . . " ,..... ........ .,... ...-. ;:::=:::':(,132;599 '. ::::':::':/:<:'222' "6' '2"2" :. ;~fÖi\>~..,.. ........ ..... ..) li¡iii¡¡:!:!i!!:.,·,1.~~.:~~1,·! (:.',;,', 71 ;41T .. ........ ..... ". ." . ,..".. . .. ...,. .. ..... - -.. ..,.,.. $584,677 ¡':::;:,:'$62~!~~?,. ..... .-....,..,........-.'... ., . ..-.... .. . . ........... - 6 - .............. . , ..... _..'.'....... ...... .... ... ... . ':::':.::::;:;~:: :;:..'::-.-:, _:~ ;:~;~::~:~¡::(t\) 535,040'>625¡216 63,902 ¡::U=:\73;~3?" 128,336 104,934 126,337 170,941 191,347 229,467 89,628 97,350 113,573 23,992 23,945 38,470 55,613 56,267 70,908 $468,510 $473,843 $578,755 479,622 503,704 602,081 54,905 53,590 63,752 $534,527 $557,294 $665,833 .......... ...... ...... $598,942 Wt)$69S,453\ ,.. 123,005 154,088 177,140 177,140 28,348 31,942 29,289 33,039 110,855 94,279 122,418 115,439 $262,208 $280,309 $328,847 $325,618 $123,596 $124,896 $146,496 $147,573 $34,289 $35,105 $50,207 $53,112 245,503 262,656 272,797 265,097 86,866 114,153 139,503 138,111 120,393 85,376 121,850 134,050 35,550 40,421 53,010 52.410 $488,312 $502,606 $587,160 $589,668 $136,669 $143,526 $162,701 $169,833 $379,136 $385,081 $0 $0 126,609 232,428 116,601 38,931 70,108 · Library General Services Public Services Technical Services Total Library Environmental Services Animal Control Health Inspections Total Environmental Services · Public Works Administration Traffic Control Street & Drainage Total Public Works Park & Recreation Administration Recreation Services Senior Adult Services Athletic Program Services Parks Maintenance Public Grounds Maintenance Total Park & Recreation · Police Administration Administrative Services Criminal Investigation Uniform Patrol Tactical Unit Tecnnical Services Detention Services Vehicle Impoundment Communications Less: Cost increase to CCD Total Police FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 3 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 $173,292 392,782 337,463 PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 :::::{::/$143,947:;; .........- . . .. . ," . - . ·"""':·"·'···4'5 ·1" ',' .... ...... . .. ........-......,'...... .', ........... .. . ¡':::'i:'¡i'::¡;:.:;.,3i~¡jb~,,¡ .......". ..... .... .... .. ..... ... . -. - .., , ... $903,537 ::"::i:'::}~~??;!~;: 306,163 758,063 983,728 2,559,254 17,739 402,475 326,096 85,820 501,816 o . '.. ...-". .. :::::::.:::.:::;:.;;:;:.::..:;..;.,..::.:.::..:......:. . ... . . . . . . . ", . .,.......,..... ..,.....-.......,.,.....,. ..... ...................... ... ",-...... ........, ~~:j~!~~:)j!r~)~)d~~~¡~{·:;:;:~t ~;i~ ~i:¡j¡;~i~¡¡jl;,~:;;~l . " " " " ...............-,... ....' ........ :"':";"::-$6' '37 37· 2':, .........,.... . .. . .... .. Wlf¡\:::~.::·~.:~ ·:/:·~;;···~;;..ß I~~ (':,'..#3·'211':2t5.1:: '" ,.'- , '.. :::f:j}t!:~<:} ,;:{:}¡,.:;:;:..:;.::: ~:: }~;~:;:;:::~~;~:/~:;;';;: ;:: :;; .~:: :;;.: ~:~::~;:: :::::~:~ :::'::::::;::::::::::-:::87'672 :: {~*;;;:~;:l:~/.. I... A ',:!i¡¡I:i'~~:~i::~~~:~~~.·j ¡1!:[!!I:;!I;!ii,¡¡¡;;~~:@¡·~ "....·'··"0' t/H?/?t: ::::.:·~·~:i)//i·:·. .;:~¡ ":;'..$,i.;525:~.~..; .;...;.;.;.;.;....-.-,...... .... . .... -... .., ...............'........,...,. .... . ,.........:...:... :':':':;;31 ~~992: ':::-;-:'':'792,547:: :;)1,036,978) ,<2726 379:: ..!I¡;:!'4~:~:~¡¡ ::::..:.,:~39,5()~.:j .., ,91,97t,: :\::531,647, ;,::\;,::::,::::;::,,(64 ,540>. .. -., .. ,..-......-..-..... .. ..-....,........, ....... $5,941,154 :'~~,~23;22$;: 334,448 362,773 422,334 422,191 133,143 116,624 144,575 143,066 $467,591 $479,397 $566,909 $565,257 136,996 138,141 164,674 163,024 415,255 402,162 474,038 473,221 1,221,283 1,387,879 1,521,073 1,506,771 $1,773,534 $1,928,182 $2,159,785 $2,143,016 114,364 75,223 81,672 81,805 411,987 388,884 484,185 489,535 62,689 68,989 73,277 77,540 106,178 111,276 134,921 134,492 385,261 325,886 657,104 654,746 197,564 218,366 0 0 $1,278,043 $1,188,624 $1,431,159 $1,438,118 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 $95,719 332,896 337,827 $766,442 $116,392 341,476 340,409 $177,769 392,782 340,333 $798,277 $910,884 296,725 279,470 309,163 608,109 629,854 765,863 807,873 857,752 996,336 2,520,778 2,369,332 2,543,311 20,969 24,396 27,239 370,223 367,662 419,160 218,443 280,426 330,776 72,292 76,389 87,888 144 439,196 502,680 0 0 0 $4,915,556 $5,324,477 $5,982,416 -7- FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 . SCHEDULE 3 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 Fire Department Administration $142,831 $149,273 $164,954 $163,004 Operations 2,665,699 2,938,517 3,316,038 3,314,058 Emergency Medical 180,029 192,008 205,393 194,743 Support Services 223,528 266,940 305,099 319,164 Fire Inspections 162,982 196,345 213,326 207,304 Emergency Management 84,735 92,523 121,131 114,154 Total Fire $3,459,804 $3,835,606 $4,325,941 $4,312,427 Building Services $587,500 $579,504 $579,504 $579,504 Non-Departmental $1,460,093 $1,384,504 $640,245 $600,727 Service Enhancements FireFighters (2) October 1996 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fire Fighters (3) April 1997 ° 0 ° 0 Library hours extension 0 0 0 0 Internal Auditor (1/2 funding) 0 0 0 0 Total Service Enhancements $0 SO $0 $0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $17,508,060 $18,450,708 $19,605,201 S19,406,743 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 ."I:¡,¡::j:'i!:~¿~~:}~:~:!!· }}t\':\23Ö'1'-4s·: .1!j·:llli:i:!:i:I!·;::~1r:~~~.¡!¡ ::':::::: '1' 4'2'1'4' 8' ,: HH??f\ 0. "... ) · ..... . .. . · ",.. .-.. .'... ¡1!!::¡~~,;Z,:~,;~?:~;¡i ::!:::!:i!'t¥57~;~'9:'i::i: . .... ,. --, ~;.;,:.:...":':-:'.'" .....; _....:.;-::: ,', ..'.....:.:-.. ::::¡:':::¡':::~rn,,~~9;,: ".' . ..., ~ttt::~}::Ji·:·:~~:~}.;t~:j::::tH !~i,;i:¡:::;,::,¡,,~~~:~¿~;! ,:.:',:,,:,:.:, "." 58'766";' ~rft\ :~.~;:.. .~..-. .) ::.:~:.:::::..:.:::'. 20 000:;' ;*;¡,:.~i::;~:..:~~;Q9.g;;¡i · . .. .. .. .....'. ,..... .... . -- . !:,:::l\:~~,~;9,~1..~R,:: ~¿~¿~~~!~ð'·¡ .....- ,. . '... . ......................................'......,..'......., - 8 - . . e_ Ni~H - 9 - The City of Choice PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 /I SCHEDULE 4 - SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE AND DISTRIBUTION NET TAXABLE VALUE: Total Appraised Value $1,963,339,314 Less Exemptions: Disabled Veteran Over 65 Homestead Disabled Persons Less: Indigent Housing Loss Abatement Value Loss Agricultural Value Loss Scenic Land Value Loss Freeport Inventory Value Loss Total Reduction to Values Add: Estimated Minimum ARB protested values (2,887,597) (59,091,558) (145,619,528) (5,385,024) (103,100) (644,009) (6,024,757) (366,275) (13,717,193) ($233,839,041) $23,491,181 $1.752.991.454 NET TAXABLE VALUE ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX COLLECTIONS: Net Taxable Value Proposed Tax Rate per $100 Valuation Estimated Total Tax Levy at 100% Collection Less Debt Service Transfer Estimated % of Collections (98.5%) TOTAL ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX COLLECTJONS(Operations portion) $1,752,991,454 $ 0.57 $9,992,051 (4,800,000) $5,192,051 98.5% $5.114.171 TAX RATE DISTRIBUTION SCHEDULE;. % of Total Tax Rate Tax Rare Distribution General Fund - Maintenance & Operations 52% $0.29618 Interest & Sinking Fund 48% $0.27382 TOTAL DISTRIBUTION OF TAX RATE 100% $0.57000 DISTRIBUTION OF ESTIMATED TAX RE'lENU~ 100.00% 98.50% Collection Collection General Fund - Maintenance & Operations 5,192,051 $5,114,171 Interest & Sinking Fund 4,800,000 4,800,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED TAX REVENUE $9.992.051 $9.914.171 -10- . FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 . SCHEDULE 5 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES -- GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND ACTUAL FY 1994/95 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 Beginning Balance $1,113,386 $1,125,991 PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 $1,125,991 !i!i'''!.,;:,¡~,.j;-!~,~.~:,~~,! ~::I:~:S Taxes Drainage Utility Interest Income Interest Income 1995 Bonds Interest Income 1996 Bonds Transfer from Golf Course . Transfer from Utility - Debt Service /Transfer from Special Investigation Payments from other Cities - Hazmat 4,200,000 4,600,000 4,600,000 470,843 467,324 493,324 65,711 40,000 70,000 0 200,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 551,874 0 261,417 90,552 90,552 35,515 0 0 0 0 0 $5,033,486 $5,949,750 $5,453,876 . TOTAL REVENUES .. .. Existing Bonds & C.O.'s Proposed 1997 C.O.'s for Equipment 1990 Lease Purchase(MDT's) 1992 Lease Purchase SanwaGEL(AFIS/Radio) Issuance Costs/Paying Agent Fees 4,893,810 5,727,387 5,175,511 0 0 0 35,515 0 0 91,556 84,514 84,514 0 0 60,000 $5,020,881 $5,811,901 $5,320,025 $12,605 $137,849 $133,851 $1,125,991 $1,263,840 $1,259,842 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES BALANCE ::.:;':::::;:;:::::;:::;:;::::.;:;.:;;:;:::;::::::::::::::;:;:::;:;.::;: ¡::{:;:~;;:;:~:t;:~t~:~:~:);;::!;::~:t~\;}::;:\~ .....".........,....................'....................'.....-..,.. ............ .... ........ ........ . ............... .... :¡;:;:;:·:::::':::;::::;::::::;;.:{:;r:::~:~:~:;:~{:f::::!::: ...-........................ .-.. ............. ............ .... ... ................................ m . . . . . . . . - .. .... . ". ~,:,J:::t~:~;·Ø:~ê:':f~1'1 ",-."" .... ..... ..-... ..-.. ..... ... ... ...... ......,........ .... ~!i!ir~Jl¡W!~fJ:~:tff:;~11ifi(~):~H Iii ¡.!¡¡~i¡!i!ilf~¡¡~~i!),;,:;~,;g~.~J ..-.. -.. ... . ;'::):,¡..i;.:*!~i:~~~;:~~3] . '.. . :··'.:i'}'·'(·$·åÊf4á1} fW/@iH\:;;;:::::;::::::::·;::t;;:::;;·;/:: ',' ....;.;...;.....:.......;./.:... " . i::,·.::.~.1.~?~~,;~J..1.:: ----------_. ----------_. '. .. .,. .'.'." ... '. .............--............ .............,............... - 11 - Ni~H -12 - The City of Choice . FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 6 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES UTILITY FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 BEVENUE~ Water Sales and Charges $11,154,405 $11,205,618 $11,783,577 $11,783,577 Less; Water Safes Watauga 0 0' 0 0 Sewer Sales and Charges 6,471,726 6,482,667 6,259,323 6,238,623 Less: Sewer Safes Watauga 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 151,332 197,867 431,885 651,885 Less: Miscellaneous Watauga 0 0 0 0 Payment from Watauga 0 0 0 0 TOTAL REVENUES $17,777,463 $17,886,152 $18,474,785 $18,674.085 OPERA TING EXPENDlTURE~ Administration $53,137 $64,161 $93,053 $95.859 Public Works 2.541,680 2,547.978 3,005,022 3,097,875 Engineering 214,008 248,410 306,813 320.310 Right of Way Maintenance 0 0 0 110,852 Utility Billing & Collections 1,136,790 1,194,886 1,264,406 1.153.554 . Purchase of Water/Sewer FTW 5,146.387 4,667,210 5,292,000 5,292.000 Less: Water/Sewer Purchases Watauga 0 0 0 0 Purchase of Water/Sewer TRA 2,746,620 3.369,614 3,250,000 3,230,000 Building Services 0 504,863 504,863 504,863 Non-Departmental 453,003 120,438 215,688 303.920 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES $12,291.625 $12,717.560 $13,931,845 $14,109.233 IDJ:~ & - JIMI::K Payment to Debt Service $2.323.673 $2.085,032 $2,077,105 $2.077,105 Franchise Fees 396,997 411,205 355,000 265,000 Indirect Costs 1.025,000 1,025,000 1,025,000 1,025.000 Reserve for Capital Projects 1,131,060 1,249,062 545,003 722,115 Payment in Lieu of Taxes 229,950 255,819 270,000 204,800 Rate stabilizaton reserve 0 0 0 0 Transfer from Utility CIP Reserve to Information Services Fund 0 0 154,000 154,000 Service Enhancement - Internal Auditor (112 funding) 0 0 0 0 TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES 5,106,680 5,026,118 4,426,108 4,448,020 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $17,398,305 $17,743,678 $18,357,953 $18,557,253 - BALANCE $379,158 $142,474 $116,832 $116,832 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -13 - PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 $}j.iª?Ii$.þ'º ¡:":(2a2?;~;t? ::$9..2p'~;5()() '1;:!;;~t;::.~~'i_]~~~ ir·i¡;;,;!.;:,f~:g~f~:~~ ¡,*,j,~;~~!:;;~~:g ·~iitMìt@l#ftWJftJ: ;¡I~'i ;!;jl~}i~'f:ìif::0Î~)t':} ;$12.~2t~tt7 ::;:.::-<:~:;,;;.v..:;:::.::::.::::::..::::::::;.~:::. : .. ."........... . q t:f·:.~~<:.:?:'~::~f:t:{rtt;· f~;.~'§§§1,::ºq:ô :<.",,26.7.75.9 :;;;!;,ii:,~:~~~~J:iª_þ ·;,:...,::",2q§.qqp ,., '" 300000 (~II ¡::'.·':'·::'~:i~~;þd6 q, ::::":::..,'-:...: ::.::·:;):::·:~:;:;:~::i:::::::;:::':; i!;;,;,iji'1~~~:~Î~é :$15;794'''087 ,',":';' ";<::::;":::}:::f:{{'" .. ...........,... ,. ...-.-;.;........;.:.;.;...;.:.-..;.;.:...... "'$74~63~ . -, ..... .... - " ,'.. . .p. -............ ....-. . '." . --------- -------- :::::;:::~:~::;:.~.:.:-:,:::.,::::::;:::;:;:::.:.:;:.:.:::; ; FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 7 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES WATER OPERATIONS ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 REVENUES ater Sales Less: Water Sales Watauga Service Charges Less: Service Charges Watauga ater Taps Less: Water Taps Watauga ater Inspection Fees Miscellaneous Less: Miscellaneous Watauga ater Wells ater Impact Fees $10,716,642 $10,929,422 $11,600,000 $11,600,000 0 0 0 0 72,061 49,502 70,077 70,077 0 0 0 0 127,492 59,860 82,000 82,000 0 0 0 0 23,698 16,247 15,000 15,000 7,358 4,042 8,000 8,000 0 0 0 0 12,738 8,591 8,500 8,500 194,416 137,954 0 0 $11,154,405 $11,205,618 $11,783,577 $11,783,577 Total Water Sales and Charges Mlscellaneou~ Interest Income Sale of City Property , Late Charges Less: Late Charges Watauga Subdivision Meter Revenue Payment from Watauga $71,881 $219,524 $77,000 $196,000 3,786 (146,874) 0 0 0 61,930 160,943 160,943 0 0 0 0 6,784 54,150 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 $75,667 $188,730 $237,943 $406,943 $11,230,072 $11,394,348 $12,021,520 $12,190,520 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total Miscellaneous Revenue TOTAL REVENUES Administration $26,568 $32,081 $57,693 $57,515 ater Operations $2,065,452 $2,143,712 $2,383,952 $2,471,805 Purchase õf Water F1W 3,929,255 3,175,331 3,792,000 3,792,000 Less: Water Purchases Watauga 0 0 ° 0 Purchase of Water TRA 1,243,324 1,701,700 1,550,000 1,530,000 Engineering 107,004 124,205 193,292 201,795 Right of Way Maintenance 0 0 0 55,426 Total Operations $7,345,035 $7,144,948 $7,919,244 $8,051,026 -14 - PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 :lf1;1öþ',t)ºº ¡.·!:¡-¡·¡;:~1¡[::$~:~gg ':.:'::.(12,375 ::H::-;::>,{,:;,~,o,qÖo :,:,',.,; ,;.;:: 0;'. '(17 '1 00 '..,.. .. ¡:',:i;:~tf=;i;j~}} ,(jP9 ,.. ,. '''8000 ¡.i~¡;;~,¡~~:~;'(j.':Ø4.0· ",:,.;.:,,:.,:,,10JOOO ;·~~{~~RWf~0ft.i:i:O . ,. , :;($:"9:14:9::;:85 ::":.;. ."~ . ":.): ;'::'" ;. : ":;:.:;::~:::::'.;:.;::::~ ::::.:{.:-::. . . . . . . . , . - ,..- .... .... . 0.. . ....... ......., ~~(~I~ :·:::/f\\189,900 (/f¥:t:,(~~~4.PO :,,}{:t,,50,OPO ¡Ji,::::;0f.¡:~::\P:~H9? 8';$Xr,i.~~':~3q ($1Ó:i?1"'âÔ5 ,'; ,,'?""}"':.-:..:.,'..,;.:;.:,:. ---------- --------- ::!-·,:;,:~~[:~::j:i'f;j::~",:~,f¡:;: i:l~;::::,;,~i'j;0;JI·j!~.;i:~,': :'o:,';:,~f,j.;~ra .>.~2,~i1Ià~6 :\:,;3.80Q,OO,O t::'(f:281,Sþp ,:1,900,000 ;·.::.;;':¡;~i~.~ÍJ;1,.:~g · ....' ...';.... .-,.-;-.'.;' "';.-,-."',:',' :-,.'.$7 ,20?:,9?p . .. - . . · · · FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 7 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES . Finance/Utility Collections Meter Reading Utility Billing/Customer Service Utility Collection Services Budget and Accounting Total Financel Utility Collections Building Services Non-Departmental TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES OTHER EXPENDITURES & RESERVES. Debt Service Franchise Fees Indirect Costs Reserve for Capital Projects Payment In Lieu Of Taxes Transfer from Utility CIP Reserve to Information Services Fund Service Enhancement - Intemal Auditor (1/2 funding) TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES TOTAL WATER EXPENDITURES . BALANCE WATER OPERATIONS ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 $158,868 $212,114 $282,132 $215,570 351,524 406,260 367,480 360,881 35,688 65,844 88,340 88,340 22,316 104,407 96,555 96,555 $568,396 $788,625 $834,507 $761,346 $0 $302,918 $302,918 $302,918 $226,502 $24,209 $117,629 $200,587 $8,166,501 $8,292,781 $9,231,991 $9,373,392 $1,438,917 $1,365,972 $1,267,034 $1,326,110 242,443 258,398 248,500 185,500 625,250 625,250 625,250 625,250 565,530 624,531 338,788 433,236 114,975 127,909 199,800 151,552 0 0 95,480 95,480 0 0 0 0 $2,987,115 $3,002,060 $2,774,852 $2,817,128 $11,153,616 $11,294,841 $12,006,843 $12,190,520 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- $76,456 $99,507 $14,677 $0 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 ......................... 0. .. ....... .. ;';";'. -:-;.>:..':", ,::.:..........:: . ¡;~if~Ìf~ ::":¡:/:i',:Iè1~9~ ".. . . .. ......-........... .. ....... ..... .... C::::,:$7.66;4Q 1 .:>./:-<...::::.::.:..:,:.:::.::::.:-.:.;;.:.;.:.... .. . ,. . ;:::.:~. :::: t\:;\'~:::~::?:::~~t~:~~;:: -;.: ~~%.:,~~R.~~1:~: , , ~;;';;:,~l~,~.'~~~.3 . " .. . ~;i:'GY.~~:¡,'!;:f'rif1:;:î::,., :::.$6,51J,Q37 00,,", ", 00':::,,0,:00:,,0:,/:,:::: ::::.: -~:~:"'?::'~:::~:::';::';;¡ ...:" .. · '.. '.' '.'-' '. .-~."'..-- . · - ... . .. '.. - . · :-..';' ;.:. .;...;....-;..-: '....~.-. .- :=:: -.;<.: ;:<;::::~::<:::: :::~;.:.:: ....:> '~'~" ::>:·::::.(~f> ;>';"; ::.:; r~:··:·:~~9~ttr:· (;':.$431',600 :,'};?i'187,~25 ; .':;: :625.250 ~¡,~~~~~~ ,:: ",,:,i);,~?:~'.:j~? '. ..-....:.;...:-.-..,.::::.;:.. !::';""!,(i-1:11o'7o.0 .......-... .;";:.;'.;,?';;;:'. ;:' ,$1,8~P;~!9 .. .... .. .......;..'-"... ',$1o.~~J i,1J6 ---------- ---------- · ... '.';'..;.;.'" ':.: .........- ....;... " ';<:::,;',~~~9 ---------- ---------- .-. ...... .,., ........;..-... ,;;.:.;.,,,, '~,.,..-' FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 8 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES . REVENUES Sewer Sales and Charges Sewer Sales Less: Sewer Sales Watauga Sewer Taps Less: Sewer Taps Watauga Sewer Transportation Sewer Inspection Fees Sewer Impact Fees Service Charges Less; Service Charges Watauga Miscellaneous Less: Miscellaneous Watauga Total Sewer Sales & Charges Mi~ Interest Income Sale of City Property Late Charges Less: Late Charges Watauga Payment from Watauga Total Miscellaneous Revenue TOTAL REVENUES Qe.ERATING EXPENDITURES Qp..er:ations Administration Sewer Operations Sewer Treatment FlW Less: Sewer Treatment Watauga Sewer Treatment TRA Engineering Right of Way Maintenance Total Operations SEWER OPERATIONS ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 $6,342,983 $6,368,547 $6,150,000 $6,150,000 0 0 0 0 30,850 20,245 35,000 30,000 0 0 0 0 15,881 8,026 18,700 3,000 20,212 17,428 19,000 19,000 61,800 44,160 0 0 ° 20,219 28,623 28,623 0 0 0 ° ° 4,042 8,000 8,000 0 0 0 ° $6,471,726 $6,482,667 $6,259,323 $6,238,623 $71,880 $94,081 $33,000 $84,000 3,785 (146,874) 0 ° 0 61,930 160,942 160,942 ° 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 $75,665 $9,137 $193,942 $244,942 $6.547,391 $6,491,804 $6,453,265 $6,483,565 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- $26,569 $32,080 $35,360 $476,228 $404,266 $621,070 1,217,132 1,491,879 1,500,000 0 ° 0 1,503,296 1,667,914 1,700,000 107,004 124,205 113,521 0 0 0 $3,303,660 $3,688,264 $3,934,591 $38,344 $626,070 1,500,000 o 1,700,000 118,515 55,426 PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 )"':'$6;'1'50;000 :"!::;;'.~~·.j~Æ$:~~~ :("';:::::::l~!?PO :::'::!::,:,!:':::Q:,It)::,o. ~¡~~':-¡1~\~~;¡';~~,~ ~~:~~¡,~~t7~~~~~ ".."J"",.. ~~fj~~~:~l:i~~ ,'..",',' ,..' ,': $4,71 ~,y.~5 ~~;;:::/~)·~:trm0t~1~5\-:. . .. . ',' ,,',. ..;'.......,.. '" . .,..-'. ............. ," . -. . .... ..... ,- --. ........;'................. ;:.:;. ::\.:.~:))·;:?f~:·:::·':;· ;;:;');:$59; 730 !;';,j';;:,!i~;';';:~!,'0::;.:, 0 1';;r,:[..;¡J·1~ø;~þ.~ ~;mA:j',?~,9..~9go M;:'~: ~.~:~,p::~~o ~ '. "..",. ".';':. .. -'-';'.,;." '<,'. \$5;526,9,15 -------- --------- ;:;:;: _;. '. 7, ,~~-~: :::::'7: :~:;:;::- :=::::: ;)::. .."- .' .. ,'" ',' :*~: ::: ::~if ::~~~:~i:~;:~~\: {:. ,;~. ~~:: : -: .". .."-'. ,.....-....-.... ' ... .. .-" ..... . .. ................,.:.. ..::.............:-:;:::.::. .. ... .... ... .. ','-. $43.700 .. . . d. . :...' .....:-....... ..;..:.-..:;.; ;"':':"'::'-:;';:-:::;::>:{;:;::":: ),;$631 ;109 ;:J ,$00.000 i'<':/' (931;943 ,..1,800,000 ':';157,13C '}': 57 :,100 .. . ... . :'.":-.;.',;.:."; ~'. $4,000,011 '$3,313':39'6 '; ',,' ,',",;,,"', , ...., .- FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 8 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES SewER OPERATIONS ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 Eirnmce/Utility Collections Meter Reading $158,867 $109,270 $145,341 $111,051 Utility Billing/Customer Service 351.524 209,286 189,309 185,908 Utility Collection Services 35,687 33,920 45,508 45,508 Budget and Accounting 22,316 53,785 49,741 49,741 Total Finance/Utility Collections $568,394 $406,261 $429,899 $392,208 Building Services $0 $201,945 $201,945 $201,945 Non-Departmental $226,501 $96,229 $98,059 $103,333 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES $4,125,124 $4,424,779 $4,699.854 $4.735,841 .----. r 11k'~S AND . Debt Service $884,756 $719.060 $810,071 $750,995 Franchise Fees 154,554 152,807 106,500 79,500 Indirect Costs 399,750 399,750 399,750 399,750 Reserve for Capital Projects 565,530 624,531 206,215 288,879 Payment In Lieu Of Taxes 114,975 127,910 70,200 53,248 Transfer from Utility CIP Reserve to Information Services Fund 0 0 58,520 58,520 Rate stabilization reserve 0 0 0 0 Service Enhancement - Internal Auditor(1/2 funding) 0 0 0 0 TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES $2,119,565 $2,024,058 $1,651,256 $1,630,892 TOTAL SEWER EXPENDITURES $6,244,689 $6,448,837 $6,351,110 $6.366.733 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- BALANCE $302,702 $42,967 $102,155 $116,832 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- - - .- -17 - PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 ....,............. .... ......,......".. ........'.....'................... ................. ............................... ...-.. I~i~¡ ::;::;::;<;;:::~;;;.:;::::::;:::::::::::;:::;.::::::;::: ...... . .......... ¡::::"f:::¡':;~::~i:~ ..................,.............................. .......................,..........'...................... ... ....................... .."" '" ................... ¡;tf:~~~~:~r:f~~~~~t:~:~~~~;:!i::!;.?~r ,...... ... .. ............ . .'.. ...... f,:,';,:!':~~R:1i~:~ ..... ;.....,....:......;.:,..:....:.;.; :¡¡:';i:::,:·~,lg:3¡Z:r:ë .1 ~"~';';':- :', : ;._.~. :-;,:·x·;·:·;;:v:·;.:-;,,;·;·," r~~~:f:;iH~ti~?;;:;~~r~~:;{:· . wWf:Et~1i~.Qiª2? {;:::.:':;.399,75.0 ß;;;::l:i::~J.=?,iQ,ª.? - 1M,! .... "." ,. ... . I'j'l~~~:~j~'i: ';':':':':.;-'-,"'-'<"';<:'>":<>:;':":-:'" ;:.:.~:;:>.;. :..:-:(..,;;~;..,::;;;:::;::;~,;;;;:::. t':'$5c452·S71' ~::::: ';:..> '.:" -~;..:..-:-:.::::.>:~~:::::: ::::~;-: 0i3';:::f~)0ti0Ä :,:':i:¡'::~,;j::i?~~~~. ---------- ---------- ...... ....;...,......... FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 9 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES NRH 20 AQUATIC PARK ENTERPRISE FUND ADOPTED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVENUES dmissions dvanced Sales Food and Beverage Merchandise ube Rentals Lockers Other Donations ppropriation from Reserve for Aquatic Pari< Capital Projects ppropriation from Retained Earnings ransfer from Pari< Fund(startup) $0 $979,964 $1,150,288 $1,077,960 0 258,242 72,365 284,065 0 270,429 293,250 297,474 0 49,760 58,752 54,736 0 113,210 125,664 124,531 0 38,148 33,558 41,963 ° 68,885 16,728 27,611 0 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 408,867 0 0 0 93,947 0 67,700 0 0 $0 $1,846,338 $1,750,605 $2,436,154 TOTAL REVENUES NDlTURE~ Office Administration Pari< Operations Food & Beverage $0 $285,704 $425,115 $610,886 0 582,436 506,980 444,987 0 342,994 313,897 364,893 $0 $1,211,134 $1,245,992 $1 ,420,766 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES URES & RESERVES Reserve for Aquatic Park Capital Projects $0' $408,867 $325,000 $325,000 Transfer to Aquatic Pa~k CIP 0 0 0 502,814 Reserve for Insurance 0 46,837 75,000 75,000 Indirect Costs 0 0 72,635 72,635 Contribution to Park Fund Capital Projects 0 179,500 31,978 39,939 TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES & RESERVES $0 $635,204 $504,613 $1,015,388 OTAL EXPENDITURES & RESERVES $0 $1,846,338 $1,750,605 $2,436,154 rALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 --------- --------- ---------- ---------- --------- --------- ---------- ---------- -18 - PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 ¡I!¡,:,~J;;;:~~~:~~~:¡ -¡¡!!¡;!I!i:ii.'!::~.~,~:,~~g;: ~if~g;~~\ """",.".30,372.. ~@:~!:::Hi:i,:::::;::::::::::i:::·(Ö: r~:: ~~:;;: t: :~: :;~ :;: :::;:n=. ::~ :;:: ::'r:.:· :~:} I¡~~~) , . "..." . !~:¥~2::2Š2~990) .. .... ... '. . ::.::;;;,:-::>,;::..;.;.~:~~::..::;;'::::':': " . ............ ..'....". ........... -,', ""n,_ .... .' , _. ~j~:~¡;:;.~~j!/f~$~;tik~·:;~;:::::~J .... ....... '.' *ti~::<:f:;·:Úi\:;::~:~};:/:(::~ .. .... ..... . . - ... ~~~:·0·~~~1",.~:jè: :i.:{:~F4Z6.420. :','.':.,:, ,". 388 896: ~if.¡f;:t0t:~;.:..:;:,:::~/-::;::·~;.;. ·:i . .... ;.;:;::~::-::..:;-::.~.:..::::;.:.;;-:':':.{:;.<..:. t~1t0;,~{]¡~~);¡;~:f:UÚ~::-:~ i:$1A87.25S: ...... ~ - ..... .. . . ,,:.:...:.:-::.:.;.:'.........:-:......;..-:-:...., . ..... -- .... ... . ... ..... . ".......,........... .... . ~1!:!~tt;::j:i,.;,,:~¡~:.:'..:¡ ". ......... ......... ... .....".. ..... 8:i::l.it$325.000 " :::::::::'·'::'):<':0: ,,:..,::.',..;:,.,:;:,J~:~~~.: ···',·,',,·.,·292,200 ' ,. $764,835 . ... - ... . --....... .....".. .. ....... ....... ..... .... ... ..-, $2,252,09.0 .... ... .... ..-. .., . , ..,,$0: ...... ---------- . ---------- .".. . . .. ........................-.-.....'.-.......,'...',..... . . - REVENUES Building Services Equipment Services TOTAL REVENUES FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 10 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES SUPPORT SERVICES FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 $989,252 $1,106,815 $1,293,687 $1,280,837 1,053,036 1,126,982 1,799,749 1,749,987 $2,042,288 $2,233,797 $3,093,436 $3,030,824 $2,042,288 $2,233,797 $3,093,436 $3,030,824 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- TOTAL REVENUES & RESERVES EXPENDITURES General Services Building Services Equipment Services Non-Departmental Building Services Reserve Vehicle Services Reserve ITransfer to Building Capital Projects TOTAL EXPENDITURES BALANCE - $126,142 $118,893 $182,330 $179,830 753,136 771,094 918,704 921,204 844,057 921,176 1,304,148 1,273,214 0 0 0 0 173,045 16,458 109,518 95,418 145,908 0 404,436 386,858 0 150,000 174,300 174,300 $2,042,288 $1,977,621 $3,093,436 $3,030,824 $0 $256,176 $0 $0 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ..n PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 i,ii!!,ii~.:~$~:~~J ........ ...... -. --.. '.. .. $2,835,983 . -. . - . - .. . ."... .. . - ... :...;........'.-...:......:;..;,.;;...:. .... ., .. . . .... .... . ,-,. ..... .- .. ". i/;~~,,~3~~9;~3 -------- --------- :::::::;,:::::.~ ::. -:: ';:':;} ::"::V~ ::~ ;:n :::::. . :::::\;:#t~~::?t~?~{r!{::·::· .-..........-.. ....... "....,... . ii~?:~::·{A{~if:~~~f)(f¡:(:·· ;'·'.;~',';""~:~;~:;:~1~ /D~'~,¡,142;678 ':/1,247,982 ..,'..', """""0 )tt>:~;:·;::::~::frfU:::~. .. ,'"",,0 '" 156,131 . . -. - .. - . . , . . - . . . . , . , ......-.... ~':;:~;::::.:'~<.::.~' ;'. {~~':>:.:::': . , .. . . 102,114 :$2,835,083 ;,';', ", ,... ,;.;""',,,<,$0 ----- ------ . .. ..' ~. . .'. .'. '-. REVENUES Charges for Service General Fund Utility Fund Total Charges for Service Interest Income Other Income propriation from Reserve for Building Capital Projects Total~herRevenue TOTAL REVENUES otal Revenues & Reserves EXPENDITURES General Services Building Services Non-Departmental ransfer to Capital Projects Budget Reserve for Building Capital Projects TOTAL EXPENDITURES BALANCE FISCAL YEAR 1996-91 SCHEDULE 11 - BUILDING SERVICES OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 $587,500 $579,504 $579,504 389,901 504,268 504,863 $977,401 $1,083,772 $1,084,367 10,325 22,613 20,000 1,526 430 0 0 0 189,320 $11,851 $23,043 $209,320 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 .. . .. ..... .. , ' .. " .. . . . . . . . .~ ............. ........-:.....'.. ..............'......,....,..-..... . ...... .. ... .. $579,504 ..,$608,479 504,863 :'532;9~2 ... . -.. ,..- ..... $1,084,367<$1,141,411 ,..........-.. 6,500 ;:6,500 650 ,.., 650 .. ....... .. --.. -, ......'..... . ... . - ..- ....'. . ~~;:;,:~~~r:{i.$?t:~:i/t{:i;:t ., . . .. . - . . . . 189,320 ..,189,320 , , , , $196,470 f::'$196470 :':' ..' ..... .. :' : .~;::: ~-':' -', ',- . .,.... .-,' ,........ ',',,' . ...,'............,...... :'~ '.;,';: : ,-; ·.~V~;:~-:::.:.:;~.:;:::.:::; ;'::;:":' $989,252 $1,106,615 $1,293,687' $1,280,637 '::$1,337,881 $989,252 $1,106,815 $1,293,667 $1,280,637<:$1,337,861 63,071 59,446 $91,165 753,136 771,094 918,704 0 0 0 0 150,000 174,300 173,045 16,458 109,518 $989,252 $996,998 $1,293,667 $0 $109,817 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- $0 $89,915 921,204 .., o 174,300 95,418 .. $93,089 :'1,142,678 .,0 102,114 o $1,260,837<$1,337,881 $0 '$0 . . - REVENUES Charges for Service General Fund & Park Devlp. Fund Utility Fund Utility CIP / Utility Construction General Capital Projects Fund NRH20 Aquatic Park Fund Crime Control & Prevention District Total Charges for Service Other Revenue ppropriations: Vehicle Mainl Reserve Note 2: Fund Balance Interest Income Sale of City Property Total Other Revenue TOTAL REVENUES Total Revenues & Reserves EXPENDITURES General Services Equipment Services Non-Departmental Reserve-Equipment Services TOTAL EXPENDITURES BALANCE FISCAL YEAR 199.6-97 SCHEDULE 12 - EQUIPMENT SERVICES OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 $495,171 481,421 32,992 3,889 o o ACTUAL FY 1994/95 $494,942 525,812 35,559 4,195 o o ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 $505,246 525,812 35,559 4,195 4,500 o REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 $493,918 525,812 35,559 4,195 4,500 o PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 ., ,,,'... "... "' ,,-." -... - ........ .- ..........., . '.. '.. ....... " ---. ....... ....... ',,', ..,..,..... ..,. - ," .. ....... ....... ...... '..... --. . ..... ,"'" ,. . .'..." ....... '" . ..'...... ..... ,',',,·$518.808 551.055 , '·,35.559 ... .>4 405 ... "'';'"', I. , ·<'4.72~ 6.000 $1.013,473 $1,060,508 $1,075,312 $1.063,984 .$1.120,552 o o 8,448 31,115 $39,563 $1,053,036 1,053,036 $63,071 844,057 o 145,908 $1,053,036 $0 o 42.045 22,613 1.816 $66,474 $1,126,982 1,126,982 $59,447 921.176 o o 556,800 117.637 20.000 30,000 $724,437 $1,799,749 1,799,749 $91,165 1.304.148 o 404,436 525,866 117,637 6,500 36,000 $686,003 $1.749.987 1,749,987 $89,915 1,273.214 o 386,858 " ," " '~', -: .. .., . - .."'.. .... "370;150 :.:0 , .., >6 500 '/>,>0 $376,650 $1,497.202 1,497,202 $93.089 1,247,982 '::<·0 156,131 $980,623 $1,799,749 $1,749,987 '$1,497,202 $146,359 $0 $0 <$0 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- _.,01 _ NI~H The City of Choice . FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 13 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES SELF INSURANCE FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 REVENUES Health/Medical ~orker's Compensation General LiabilitylUnemployment Other Income TOTAL REVENUES $1,623,540 $1,849,211 $2,075,098 428,543 510,466 559,189 177,700 178,900 242,900 342,228 363,328 260,000 $2,572,011 $2,901,905 $3,137,187 $2,043,499 570,568 239,900 260,000 PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 $2í178,625 "'.' "613 462 ......-.. .. ..' 'i:;:,:\:...;::~:þ,;~". ~,~ :'".: >;...,:.:<.'.:-:.::-~:... . , . . -., , ' . . . . . $3,113,967 ::-'::$~,~~,þ82 EXPENDITURES HealthlMedical $2,263,600 $1,988,750 $1,977,300 $1,977,300 . Worker's Compensation 244,720 336,570 320,000 360,000 Other Insurance 85,778 312,769 218,900 218,900 Human Resources Oper. Expenses 134,979 162,446 188,968 201,398 Reserve for Insurance Claims (157,066) 96,386 362,019 286,369 Life Insurance Premiums 0 4,984 70,000 70,000 Service Enhancement - Risk Manager (Jan 97) 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,572,011 $2,901,905 $3,137,187 $3,113,967 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- - - _ .,1 _ '.. .. ... .- . , , .. ........ "' :~)~;;::::~_::} ::.;~:~;::?::{::?:':::=::::::: :-:-:.:.',:,:.:::::.:.:". ...........-. ._.....-..,.... .,..........-............ ................'.-..,'.... . . 'H_'. . , "..$2,1~f3,!71 .:,'-'(",:'.'380,äoo .. ," ,:' ,225~900 L, ,,209,909 ....:'",,~,902 ,':·,,:::",;78~900 ^ . ".,. .. . ",. .... 66,6QO .,,' ":$3,322,082 , ' ',·'·'.'$0 ------- -------- FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 . SCHEDULE 14 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES SELF INSURANCE FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 Health/Medical General $955.192 $1.074.969 $1.201,466 $1.175.849 Utility 268,356 259.977 318.564 285,268 Internal Services 69.520 77.902 111.230 121,161 Crime Control District 0 0 0 0 Aquatic ParklPark Corp 0 0 ° 53,257 Miscellaneous 22.279 114,801 81,749 79,234 Dependent Receipts 308,193 321,562 362,089 328,730 Total Health Revenues $1.623,540 $1,849,211 $2,075,098 $2,043,499 General 223,755 245.370 266.268 264.728 Utility 184,193 181,725 197.607 180.097 Internal Services 14,350 14.350 20.440 22.266 Crime Control District 0 0 ° 0 Aquatic Park/Park Corp. 0 0 0 71,143 Miscellaneous 6.245 69.021 74,874 32.334 Total Worker's Compensation Revenues $428,543 $510,466 $559.189 $570.568 General Utility Internal Services 128.700 129,900 193,900 184,900 25.000 25,000 25,000 31,000 24.000 24,000 24,000 24,000 $177.700 $178,900 $242,900 $239,900 Total General Liability Revenues Other Income Franchise Interest Income Other Income 214,890 84,163 64,275 190,000 70,000 o 190.000 70,000 o 199,670 53,985 88,573 $342,228 $363.328 $260,000 ,",-, . ,- . . $260.000:'$260,595 . . -. . . . , ,. . Total Other Income PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 ::r~1';2()1.~Ø4~' :::::':::;:::::::~90:ö4Ø ,;'::;';::',:.1:25 ;7()q }:i:\\::".,.93,6?~, '::'\'U:\':? 61 ~~15. i'::¡::'i':'".::¡'ä~::~~ , , .." ... · . ' . . .. ... - . ..' .. .-, .". ' . ::,$2',178,625 :':'~:;'/:::; ,~- ..;;.::..;x;:.::. '; ,.{:::~>: ........ . ....- .. ..,..... . .-... .,...,........ ..-..;'.:-.,;.........'... ¡~;·;¡:~¡~::f~':~b.~i7:k:~~i~¡J;. ¡.::'.·;';,!'i;i'~~::;~ /::::":,::'23.10Q ,:::/::(.<: 20.0?0 :;::,:"'i/ 89,78~ "';::3:2,124 .. .".;.:," :~.;.Jo; . .....,....,. ... - . .... . . · . . , . . . . ,: : $61'3"462 n~:\~·: . .,.......... , , · - . ' .,.. ,..... ~...,'~;::>:.<:' ::~ :}~}~:/~~::{i '''.,:: ::::/.=.)\.<:;.;;;::.;:. ;'.";'.';.".:'.';' 214,400 31,OOQ . 2~,O~P. .. " .' '.'."<' ... .,'.<$269 ,:400 .., :< 190,000 :,,),'70,595 :<:::,0 OTAL REVENUES .., ., " " $2,572,011 $2.901.905 $3,137,187 $3.113,967$3.322.08? ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ....~ . . - IID~~ . . -- . - General Utility Internal Services Total Health and Medical Expenses u. - . - General Utility Internal Services Total Worker's Compensation Expenses 1_.. - (liability, Property & Unmployement) General Utility Internal Services Total Other Insurance Expenses Human Resources Expenses Operating Expense Service Enhancement - Risk Manager (Jan 97) Total Human Resources Expenses - -.. - .. Reserve for Insurance Claims Life Insurance Premiums Total Other Expenditures ITOT AL EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 15 - SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES SELF INSURANCE FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 $1,874,840 272,649 116,111 $1,581,057 265,471 142,222 $1,595,713 272,193 109,394 $2,263,600 $1,988,750 $1,977,300 _. 211.468 303,903 275,200 32,847 31,615 41,600 405 1,052 3,200 $244,720 $336,570 $320,000 43,504 278,862 176,920 21,522 33,907 41,980 20,752 0 0 $85,778 $312,769 $218,900 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 $1 '~~~:;~; :¡!¡¡i!~~;i~;¡~~ 1 09,394 !,i:,-,}:;¡,t~~;t1êt,7 . ,. ..'",. .- ...... .... ........ .' .........', ::::~;;' ,':: :)';':;::.~::~:!~::~: :;i:::?~ :~;:;: '::;::: ... ..', $1,977,300 :...$2,138;771 ',' ',.'..":' 315,200 41,600 3,200 , '.: S",' '. · ..: . ',' .: . .:::.~. '. .', ...... ..".., .. .. " ~~~1 . .....,. · . , . . . . $360,000 l':,,::r~~~:?~g~ö :::::/~.":'., . '. .,:'. ..'::. .......~.:. :.:.:>.;........:.......::..:>;:..;:':..;::..;:.. . ." "...,' .... .,. ~::<;:~!t>:. ":;~;;~:::r::r'::'::-:::::' . ,. . .. . .' , . ,. . .... . . . ... . . .. ., ..,' . ...............'............. .. ;...~.-:.; /::. :.:,: :~.:::::~:\~/:~.;::-:;: .' .'- .'~."". .. ..... . 176,920 .'.183,920 41,980 ,41¡980 o \; ,).<..0 . '.. -.. r::::;t~;::::: f.')~~~J*i:::~( $218,900 "::)':$225,900 ,,"',,' $134,979 $162,446 $188,968 $201,398 0 0 0 0 $134,979 $162,446 $188,968 $201,398 (157,066) 96,386 362,019 286,369 0 4,984 70,000 70,000 ($157,066) $101,370 $432,019 $356,369 $2,572.011 $2,901,905 $3,137,187 $3,113,967 ---------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- _ ')1:: , .. ......... ,'0..,..... ".'.,.', '....' , ...... -. ........., '.: -. .; :.' ~'" .'. -: . ,::: ::.~: /.. '. -:: : .: ':. .,,$209,909 '. "::;:-:.:...~"..,, ','" ·N. ....', 66,600 " , " ',' , .-'.- ..... . '-- '.. ;-:.:-: .'''- ...:..... ..:.,....; ./.....-. .. ....,. · .... ;\':' , $276,5()9 . , ~.;.: ',;-;. : ~..'. .......:.....: .,.... ... . .. . -, ... .:::::): k~\'.~ :\,::::\:;.:::....::. ;:·::...,;';h;~:~,~~. , ',.'. ""':':'",,, ,'" :$~Q9,~p2 .. ...... ... --. .. ...." - ..... :·~:'-?}:{·;:V:;nt'/{, \$3,322;082 -------- ------ ........... FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 16 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REVENUES General Fund Utility Fund Support Services Fund Self-Insurance Fund Park! Recreation Facilities Devl. Fund Capital Projects Fund NRH20 Aquatic Park Fund Economic Development Fund Total Telecommunications ¡ChargeS for Service - Computers General Fund Utility Fund Utitily Reserve-Capital Projects Support Services Fund Self-Insurance Fund Park! Recrecation Facilities Devl. Fun Capital Projects Fund NRH20 Aquatic Park Fund Economic Development Fund Total Computer Other Income Interest Income Total Other Revenue OT AL REVENUES EXPENDITURES General Services Major Computer Systems Microcomptuer Systems elecommunications Data Network GIS System Reserve for Systems Improvements ransfer to Debt Service OTAL EXPENDITURES BALANCE INFORMATION SERVICES FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 $0 o o o o o o o $0 $0 o o o o o o o o ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 $0 o o o o o o o $147,773 55,721 6,366 1,443 3,220 2,805 7,611 1,638 $226,577 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 $147,773 38,172 6,366 1,443 3,220 2,805 7,611 1,638 PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 :::($155;162 ¡,.,:::..:...:.'.,.,¿~:~: »:1 t5~5 :>3,542 t:~>:. ", :. <}::2~'B5.8 ;i:··.,:;.:,·';;:,,·.:;¡,;;·:~¡~~~ $209,028:,+$219,641 $640,840 264,878 154,000 39,881 10,466 15,176 5,112 68,595 9,466 . . . .. .., . . . . -. ,,'. ,- .... . . .,. .,..,." ,-... . . .... '. . .,. '.-' '. .;..,............... . ,....-. .. ...~. . .... .. ....... .. ...-..... .,-. ... ...... ........- . .,........-.,... ',',' i:}"$690;355 .'::. '285,964 ":123,500 . 41.875 , :-;::., 10;989 '17,164 5,226 72,025 9,939 $0 .... ..... ,',' $0 $1,209,912 $1,209,014 >$1,257.037 $0 $0 o o o o o o o o $640,840 265,776 154,000 39,881 10,466 15,776 5,112 68,595 9,466 $0 $0 $21,000 o 0 14,000 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 o $0 $0 .,. .. .. '" . $0 $1,436,489 $1,453,042 ($1,511,678 $0 o o o o o o o $0 o o o o o o o $210,787 124,937 423,224 214,256 168,800 98,952 195,533 o $217,083 165,532 461,370 213,694 116,800 99,427 179,136 o $244,929 235,779 467,494 182,923 ;,11,0'.770 191.839 '\>,'.., 0 , , 75,000 $0 $0 .. . ..... $0 $1,436,489 $1,453,042 !;,:$1.~!ª;734 $0 $0 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- $0 $92.944 . . - FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 17 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 REVENUES PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 Sales Tax Interest Income Tennis Center Revenue $3,503,388 70,000 o $3,406,946 ¡:<,~~~?9.1~º9.,q 36,000 :;:;'::';::':=;fi/.~ª,;ººq o :i:::::;,;:;,;..:;;,::;:':;m,Œt? $3,284,878 117,481 o $2,873,933 94,105 o TOTAL REVENUES $3,573,388 . . .. .. ....' . . . . . .. . ... . $3,442,946 i"i"¡::,~,~;î~:~.~~~?= $2,968,038 $3,402,359 EXPENDITURES - . - .. Park Facilities Development Admin. Indirect Costs Maintenance & Operations Tennis Center Operations Service Enhancements Two Crew Leaders & Equipment $217,000 $190,041 $276,222 $276,222 133,000 164,526 180,882 180,882 65,000 138,577 265,485 247.223 0 0 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 $415,000 $493,144 $722,589 $829,327 Total Operating Expenditures IOfh,.r - &- Debt Service $701,228 $1,071.721 $1,237,126 $1,238,625 Reserve for Capital Projects 1,545,562 1,461,797 1,613.673 1.374.994 Undesignated Fund Balance 306,248 375,697 0 0 Total Other Expenditures and Reserves $2,553,038 $2,909,215 $2,850,799 $2,613.619 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,968,038 $3,402,359 $3,573,388 $3.442,946 NET INCOME (LOSS) $0 $0 $0 $0 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- - .. .... ................. ..... ......-........ .... ....-.....,......... .. ........ ..,............ ......................... ..................... .. .', ....,.......... ...... ........ ..... ......'.. . . . .. ...-..... ............... ." . . ~¡¡~;mmtN¡rl~~¡¡~l)t~l¡j¡:j: ;::::·:~:r~{:~::r:~:)i:f(:~;i:fi:~:j:~:::;:; ~::::::::~::;:::::;::::::.~::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: BI Ell :!:::i!::;Q;:::;:t:~:~7~?:,ßg .....::.........'.......-. ::,:i;!J~~,J,~;~1;~, . ,.. ~1~¡ij¡!j!.¡,;¡~:ij¡]~~·¡~~i~¡,lfiJ!··! ,. -:. ~ : ".;..~.'. :~;/.:.',;.:.:.:.:....,..:- :.:..;.: : ;~iI ... - .-.. . :W$3733',fif r::::~.'·' : ..~:::-:.;,,::;:/..;:-:';.::;:::;; . . ,...-....... , .. .: .. .... ..~.' ;':':':':-:':'-/ .... i:::a::::m;:¡i':t;:;;,;:i¡::l9. ---------- --------- ",'" . .. ."-"-' .·..·.·.·.·.·.·...·..4.·...·.·...·.·.·.....·.·...·...·.·. FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 18 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES PROMOTIONAL FUND ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 ACTUAL FY 1993/94 REVENUES $26::~~ Iii $271,251 ~l'¡~I:¡1.~3'~;¥~~:~ $225,919 6,000 31,393 $258,166 4,298 o $191,353 2,830 68,555 Occupancy Tax Proceeds Interest Income Appropriation of Fund Balance $262,464 $263,312 $262.738 TOTAL REVENUES IJ11~1111~)¡~ . ":-...;.:.;.:.' _j~~œZ Im~iq~' f~;jr\W1~3'@§1 / EXPENDITURES $262,738 $222,119 $263,312 $258,625 $262,738 S222,119 S263,312 $258,625 SO $40,345 SO $12,626 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Economic Development TOTAL EXPENDITURES BALANCE --------- --------- ~M·N~*;;..;;.c.:;,~:....·.... ( \, . FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 19 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REVENUES Contributions -NRH Water Bills Less Watauga Contributions Grant Proceeds Interest Income Publicity Fees Special Event Sponsorships Approp. of Fund Balance-Parks TOTAL REVENUES . EXPENDITURES - Parks Library ~nimal Control General Public Improvements TOTAL EXPENDITURES BALANCE - DONATIONS FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 $93,508 $97,990 0 0 5,500 2,653 3,394 6,673 17,281 20,253 27,866 28,314 7,148 0 $154,697 $155,883 $93,300 o o o o o o $93,300 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 $93,300 o o 7,000 o o o PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 "',:,,:,:,,,$9~,3ÖO :,::;;::;;;;):;;::~.~:~~~hØ. ..,'..', .. , .0 · ' . ,. ., . . . . · .., . d."' (:,;\:::::",::-,::7'9..,.0 ....', ,..,.." '.a ...-..... '" ........... .. " '-,' ........,.. . -,- .,." ,.. ......:.;:::.;~' ::·,:;:>8;:;;::;:::;:::::;-:::::: ;...:.:..;.:-..-:.:.::.'.;.;;.:.;.;.;.:.:.;.;.....;. . ...... ,......-.... ...... ." ....,. . . ,.-.......... L::'.::-:':;,ri?:j:'":,:=,,, 0 ". '",'.. ...... a .. . . - . . , , . . . . ... -. . ...'........ . ~: ::;;:~::::.~;;.;:.::::;:::::::::;::::::~:;:::::.t::, .;.;::::;;.'~;; ::/;. .;::: :::';*:::.::::;::~.::.,~. ". ....... On' ...._..... '. .- . . .. ·...._·0. . · '. - ..-...... '... $10.0,300 "':":-:.'$84::000 ,:'/:<:,,::.., .:i:'. :> $101,427 $49,8.01 $.0 $.0 42,123 37,365 47,000 47,0.0.0 3,431 7,6.09 27,800 27,80.0 7,500 0 18,500 18,5.00 $154,481 $94,775 $93,300 $93,300 $216 $61,108 $0 $7,.0.00 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- .,'" .... .....'..:.':.:;.:::..'..,.;;..-: . ..... ;::.'.:' ~~:::;~:;::::~~;:::::::..~:.:; .. , , .:--'................. : ;. .·.:x·/·::;.~::·::::.:· .~.., :':,$.0 .38;25.0 :"N"".'., '5 :,:. ,:,:22;9 0 ",:':, '.,.,<~.R~,~.o9 >:::'st''($76;5.o.o , , : ":':Y':<,,:,:,:, "c:'" ",',..",'....$7 '5.0.0 " '~',=i...;", .' .. ,. .................. FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 20 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Beginning Balance REVENUES Federal Forfeited Funds State Forfeited Funds Interest Income MDT Reimbursements FIS Reimbursements Radio System Reimbursements ransfer In Other Income ransfer from General Fund (Loan) TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES Debt Service - MDTs Loan Payment to General Fund Motor Vehicle Maintenance MDT Maintenance Motor Vehicles FIS Maintenance Radio Maintenance Telephone Service MDT Equipment FIS Equipment Prior Year Expenditures Reserve for Forfeited Funds Other Expenses - TOTAL EXPENDITURES BALANCE SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 ACTUAL FY 1994/95 ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 $67,093 $290,125 $205,891 . ....., --..,., ,. ....., '... ... .... .. $205,891 '..'".;'$ 1'4"::21' '1 ::;:.::':::.::";':::'.->:-:",..,'. -;::".:" $99,427 $119,935 $75,000 $75,000 8,946 1,072 1,000 1,000 6,388 15,525 10,000 10,000 182,232 163,434 0 0 151,079 25,061 0 0 0 149,865 0 0 52,751 0 0 0 2,936 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 $570,852 $765,017 $291,891 $491,891 .. ..-.......:-.................-.'. .... '.... ·x·::-:~:-.·/::;.·.::;;:;::::·· . '.. ..,..... " . -....,.... ;:·::,;:.'....·.:..)~0~:g~~ .',' ""'10000 :¡::'¡,;o;!,,,:":,,.,:,::::i:::::.i\O ):','::\:F:(:i:?::::::Ö ", ";""";<;:::::.:;::',0 :()'.' /t:'-'(::/'i:?\\::,O ,',','" """':-.:--.:"() " 0 ..... $100,211 ,- ....:' ..:....;.'..'.;.... . . . ..' ";~' . ;.: :. :- .'. .. ",. " . ',-,' $71,030 $35,515 $0 $0 "$0 0 0 0 0 45,717 2,531 6,935 4,000 0 273 132,686 85,133 0 83,032 ,</":,,,;:,0 0 103,161 0 0 ' .. "';::":0 16,121 16,848 0 0 ;';:0 0 115,370 0 89,002 0 0 3,000 0 2,213 0 17,251 0 .. ;';0 303,433 40,951 120,814 0 0 0 0 72,350 0 0 0 0 0 82,000 0 0 157 0 0 0 0 $280,727 $559,126 $86,000 $477,680 $45,990 $290,125 $205,891 $205,891 $14,211 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- $54,221 . . - . FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 21 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND ACTUAL FY 1993/94 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $340,550 REVENUES Drainage Fees Interest Income $659,955 1,262 TOTAL REVENUES & BALANCE $1,001,767 URES ITransfer for General CIP ITransfer to Debt Service 270,803 531,674 $802,477 TOTAL EXPENDITURES BALANCE ACTUAL FY 1994/95 $199,290 $656,993 716 $856,999 300,678 470,843 $771,521 $199,290 $85,478 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- - ADOPTED BUDGET FY 1995/96 $85,478 $655,000 600 $741,078 o 467,324 $467,324 REVISED BUDGET FY 1995/96 PROPOSED BUDGET FY 1996/97 $85,478 :::':::,::i,::,~j~:g,i~~ $655,000 1,900 . - --... -. . -. . ..".. ... ... ..... -, "".... ..,. ........ ....................... ...,...-..... ..."............. _.~.... ....................... ... ....-................ ,.... .. ...... ..................... . . . .. ......... ,. ~......:.:.;.:.;-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.. . .., .. , .... .. .. ... " , ........ .................... ............. ........ ......... III . ,.. ..' .", .",.', _,_n ............ ................... .'....... ..................-. .............. -......... ....... $7 42,378¡t;.~f.ii!:~~~:R~ .,.....;->.........:.;;...;.;...;.:...;.:-:.:.:.;.:.;.;.;.... ;;:;:::~;:~::::::;~::::::;:::~:::;x;;:::::::::;::;::;~;:;:; :::::::.:::;:::8:;:::;~::::::::::::;::::::::::~:::;::::.:::. :~~t{:fàt~J!~f~;fut¡jlf~¡¡¡¡!~~¡~ 11~lllt~tl¡I¡~:::¡ ~;~~I{~~!~i!~ ...., ., .-....... '..... $626,724 I~t~¡i~~l~~;~ ===~:7=3~~~ ===~~~~~~ !~:~!~~~~~~~ 133,400 493,324 . II FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 SCHEDULE 22 - SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REVENUES Sales Tax Interest Income TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES Operating Expenditures Administrative Services Investigations Uniform Patrol Detention Services Technical Services lVehicle Impoundment Communications General Fund Police Department Increases Total Operating Expenditures Other Expenditures & Reserves Transfer to General Fund - Indirect Costs Transfer to General Fund - General Fund Police Dept. Salaries Reserve for Transition Undesignated Fund Balance Service Enhancements Child Advocacy Center - Total Other Expenditures and Reserves TOTAL EXPENDITURES NET INCOME (LOSS) CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT ADOPTED REVISED PROPOSED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 FY 1995/96 FY 1995/96 FY 1996/97 -- - ---------------- ---------------- $0 o $0 o $0 o $794,23~ :¡¡¡¡¡:¡~~;~i~~~'~~~ :::::;";::::;::::;:::;::::::::::::::;::::::;:::;::;:::::;::;:;:.; -- ----- -------- --- - ---- - :;:;;::::;..:~:.:;:.::;:::;;::::~::;:..::;;:::::::.::::,:.:',' $0 $794,236 :[,j,~:~:.,:~:~~~'g,~.9 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 0 4,925 0 0 0 30,004 0 0 0 11,545 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,721 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $49,195 $0 $0 0 0 .. $0 $0 $0 o o o o 745,041 o ¡;:':.;;¡:;::j;¡:~:::~¡*=:*:::::¡:¡::::¡:,:¡"::¡'.' . '_'_H' ...... ...... .._. ..................... ......... .................-..............................._........ ~f\ri?::~ttr~~t¡t~i)~ff;f} ¡·¡j¡¡¡¡::~:~~·~~:~~~!I¡¡¡.!¡I[i¡!¡;j¡:¡ . . ,.'",. !';['~~~,~9gi:~<~J !!!j1~~;;;i~~I;II[lfi;ji¡.- $0 iiils II $0 $0 $0 $0 ¡{;.i!iri]~m:~f1jj~~@,;:j:, $745,041 ~i@;~$8()5'419 tfj@~j~:;¡;&~~~*k~~~~:·~:·::· $794,236 1!:~:.~~;.~BiigBr $0 $0 $0 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- $0 liJ.~~;fijt.¡!'1~8 ::.::;.;.:,0.;Q~¡;::;.:_»:::.;..;::.;.;.ú,;...·:·, · · · . . 1996/97 Proposed Capital Projects Budget NRH The City of Choice All Funds Budget Summary 1996/97 Capital Projects . Project FUNDS Io~ 1996/1997 19.97/1998 1-998/1999 I.otal General Street Capital Projects $5,069,207 $8,671,218 $4,676,875 $0 $18,417,300 General Drainage Capital Projects 5,030,600 ·"'·'477.599 0 0 5,508,100 Permanent Street Maintenance Fund 0 350,000 0 ° 350,000 Permanent Capital Maintenance Projects 0 179,886, ° 0 179,886 Public Safety Capital Projects 1,675,000 0 0 ° 1,675,000 Major Capital Equipment Program 0 ' .'.. 2.346.638 0 0 2,346,638 Utility Capital Projects 1,011,800 1,525,000·' 165,000 0 2,701,800 Park Capital Projects 4,785,286 2,080,875 1.664,045 1,975,000 10,505,206 General crp Personnel 0 192,695 0 0 192,695 Utility CIP Personnel 0 «135.875, 0 0 135,875 Utility Construction, Personnel 0 598,018 ' ° ° 598,018 TOTAL $17,571,893 ,',$16,557,705 ' '$6,505,920 $1,975,000 $.42,610,518 .. -... -,-... .. -. '. .- ...,......_-", . ==========" ==========:: ===========': ======== ========= SQ..URC.ES OF FUNDS 1992 Park Sales Tax Bonds $51,521 $0 $0 $0 $51,521 1994 Park Sales Tax Bonds 1,158,997 0 0 0 1,158,997 Sales Tax Reserve for Park Capital Projects 3,074,768 .1,586,675 1,664,045 1,975,000 8,300,488 Utility Reserve 868,000 ·0 165,000 0 1.033.000 Utility Retained Earnings Reserve for CIP 0 ,·556,640 0 0 556,640 Utility Retained Earnings Bond Reserve 0 300,000 0 0 300,000 . 1989 Revenue Bonds 0 268,360 0 0 268,360 Miscellaneous Utility 72,300 0 0 0 72,300 Drainage Utility Fees 63,400 0 0 0 63,400 1997 General Obligation Bonds 0 4,829,218 0 0 4,829,218 1996 Certificates of Obligation/Drainage 1,150,000 0 0 0 1,150,000 1996 General Obligation Bonds 4,421,000 0 0 0 4,421,000 1995 General Obligation Bonds 265,000 0 0 0 265,000 1995 General Obligation Bond - Public Safety 1,675,000 0 0 0 1,675,000 1994 Bond Program 0 0 699,100 0 699,100 1993 General Obligation Bonds 2,180,200 0 0 0 2,180,200 1992 General Obligation Bonds 618,500 0 0 0 618,500 1989 General Obligation Bonds 20,000 0 0 0 20,000 1987 General Obligation Bonds 224,000 0 0 0 224,000 ISTEA Grant Funds 0 4.319.500 3,977,775 0 8,297,275 Permanent Street Maintenance Fund 0 350,000 0 0 350,000 1997 Certificates of Obligation 0 2,346,638 0 0 2,346,638 TPWD Grant Funds 500,000 0 0 0 500,000 Building Services 0 179,886 0 0 179,886 Interest Income 0 202,000 0 0 202,000 Transfer - Aquatic Park 0 292,200 ° 0 292,200 Unspecified Streets 414,257 0 0 0 414,257 Unspecified Drainage 725,450 0 0 0 725,450 General CIP Personnel 0 192,695 0 0 192,695 Unspecified Utility CIP 89,500 1,133,893 0 0 1,223,393 --- e $17,571,893 $16,557,705 $6,505,920 $1,975,000 $42,610,518 ===========-=========== -----------. - ------- =========== -------------------- . Schedule 1 1996/97 General Street Capitál Projects Budget Summary Project To Date A. B. $785,000 618,600 341,000 110,000 1,283,000 400,000 368,500 3,207 300,000 250,000 100,000 o o 509,900 $5,069,207 c. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. Total Street Projects ,'"., . Sources of Funds e 1996/1997 1997/1998 19J!8/1999 $0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 812,518 1,831,775 0 270 000 2,146,000 0 250,000 0 0 555,500 0 0 656,400 0 0 269,900 699,100 0 0 0 0 $8,671,218 $4,676,875 $0 IoJal .'.'....,'-.,.,.....-.....-.--. .' ....-.". ..-. ._,. -----..".. ....-......." ".. . .." '. .._,-,...",. $1,130,000 800,000, , 442;000 ",720,000 .1 ;283,000 .. ...._,........... . .........- ,... ',',',',"'-',"-",',"',',",--' 4,751;000 , '637,000 ... .-.. ,.... , 2,647,500 2,716,000. 500,000 , "" 655,50() ,/ '.'656,400 969,000 · .. '509,900 $18,417,300 $0 $4 351718 $0 $0 $4,351,718 3,064,500 0 0 0 3,064,500 265,000 0 0 0 265,000 0 0 699,100 0 699,100 600,000 0 0 0 600,000 618,500 0 0 0 618,500 0 4,319,500 3,977,775 0 8,297,275 414,257 0 0 0 414,257 88,950 0 0 0 88,950 18,000 0 0 0 18,000 Total Sources of Funds $5,069,207 $8,671,218 $4,676,875 $0 $18,417,300 ----------- ----------- , . Schedule 2 1996/97 General Drainage Capital Projects . Budget Summary Drainage Projects A. Calloway Branch Channel "A" (Windhaven to Hightower) B, Calloway Branch Channel "B" (Hightower to Chapman) C. Main Street Drainage Improvements (Marlett Court) D. Miscellaneous Overland Relief Projects E. North Tarrant Parkway F. Teakwood Court Drainage - Phase II G. Walkers Branch Channel - Phase II H. Windhaven Road Drainage Improvements Project To Date 1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999 Imal TotålDrarnage)rOJêctS< ,"'.'.' $620,000 $200,000 $0 d . ""i,'.'. 1,291,500 ..' ,27 .500 0 i·'······', 405,000 " <0 0 227,900 ,..".,..·0 0 174,000 0 0 460,000 .'. .'.,',...'...0 0 1,824,200 ··,···'·0 0 28,000 " 0 0 ,. , $5,030,600 $477,500 ·.·..$0"·'" ,...-,..,.............. . ...,.. ..,,,,,... ...., .............,. ."......-....,.... -.,' .-.............-....--... .-".,........"". ..""............. ........,.."".... ., ---"." .... ". ---_.",,-,.. . .,. ...., - -,-,. . .." ....-., '. $0 '. $82(),000 "........... ...._". ., ,........,. .,-.. . .... '",-,.."... -,- -. ..... ............--" '. o '1,569,000 . ",-. .._.-.-.--.......'._._-.'. . ._-................. .'_._-_._..-......'.....-....._-...... .... .....". ......-.-.....-.."'. o ...,..",.<..4QS,IJ()() 0>2?!,9ºQ< o < 1t4,0()() , o ·4«)0,000 o ", ·1,824,200' O~ø,OºO """0_'" ....,. $0 "$5,508,100 Sources of Funds Drainage Projects 1997 General Obliaation Bonds $0 $477,500 $0 $0 ,',' $477,500 1996 General Obliaation Bonds 1,356,500 ,'. 0 0 0 '>1,356,500 . 1996 Certificates of OblioationlDrainage 1,150,000 ..' ,·".·0 0 0 1,150,000 1993 General Oblioation Bonds 1,580,200 '.' 0 0 0 1,580,200 1989 General Oblioation Bonds 20,000 , 0 0 0 '20,000 1987 General Obligation Bonds 224,000 0 0 0 224,000 Drainage Utilitv Fee 63,400 0 0 0 <63,400 . Unspecified Drainaae 636,500 0 0 0 ' 636,500 Total SoUrces of Funds $5,030,600 $477,500 $0 $0 $5,508,100 =========== - . . - Schedule 3 1996/97 Permanent Street Maintenance Projects Budget Summary Permanent Street Maintenance Fund IOverlay Projects '··""Tota.I..:)~rmª1Î~ht$f~fM~ll'Ìt~l'Ìªnc:~...' , Project To Date Iotal 1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999 II $0 II $350,0001 I $011 $0 $0 I $350,000 , '$0, ,$350,000 .. ..... - -,.,-. ...... .-.........----.. . $0' "".' $350,000 ' Sources of Funds Permanent Street Maintenance Fund ¡Permanent Street Maintenance Fund .' Tota.ISoÚrC:êf¡ofFÚ"ds'" I I $01 I $350,000 1 I $01 I $01 S350,Ooo . $0 $350,000'· ' $(). " $0 $350,000· ---------- ----------- . . e Schedule 4 1996/97 Permanent Capital Maintenance Projects Budget Summary A. T otaIP~I'I'ri~ljèhtÞélpit.f"'~iljtèl1åiicePI'()jects ..., ,',. Sources of Funds TotalSÓlIl'ces.Óf FUnds.·....··,··' Project To Date ~ 1996/1997 $45.886 '30.000 , 80 000 , ,', 24.000 $0)d$179,886 1997/1998 1998/1999 §§ :ürtaI ..........., -,... .............."-_..,,.. .. --................. . ...-................... ..--...-.............. .........--.."...." , ., '.'.' $45,886 '" ..,..' .'30.000 , ,.'.')~:~~~ $0'..· . ,". .$0>$119;886 "$0 $0 II $179.88611 ,.'$0 $179.886 $011 $0 $0 1<$1'79,886 '. $17~,886 ======== . . - Public Safety Projects Schedule 5 1996/97 General Public Safety CéJpital Projects Budget Summary TotåIPÙbUcŠ~fêtYPrOjeêt$<' , Sources of Funds Total. Sources óf Funds<> >,'> Project To Date $200.000 75,000 300,000 1,100,000 . $1,675,000 $1,675.000 II $1,675,000 1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999 I»$~I~~ $0 $0 011 $0 011 $0 $200,000 75,000 , , >300,000 >' ">·'".··1,10P,OQO $0"· ','$1,675,000 o I ,$1,675,000 .,.. ,.,,'. ,. $0 ,,',' $1,675,000 -------- ------- . . Schedule 6 1996/97 Major Capital Equipme.nt Program . Budget Summary Project I2.Date 1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999 !Q1al A. Ambulance $0 $160,000 $0 $0 " . $160,000' B. Computer System - CourVFire Public Safety 0 148,088 0 0 '148,088 C. Computer System - General Services 0 583,550 0 0 5113,550 D. Fire Truck (Quint) 0 440,000 0 0 fí().OO() E. Hazmat Truck 0 ,.. ,85,000 0 0 8$,Oºº F. Librarv Computer System 0 330,000 0 0 3~().000 G. Platform Truck 0 80,000 0 0 , ',,"." .80.000 H. SCADA System 0 --'---'--400,000 0 0 ' ·"'400.000' I. Sweeper 0 120,000 0 0 120,000 - Total MájorÇápital Equipment $0 $2,346.638 $0 $2,346.638 - ,.. Sources of Funds 11997 Certificates of Obligation 1 I $01 I $2,346,6381 I $01 I $01 $2,346,638 ,TotalSolJrcesofFÙl1ds .' $0 $2,346.638 $0 $0 $2,346,638 ----- ------- . e . þ Schedule 7 1996/97 Utility Capital PrQjects . Budget Summary . - A. B. c. T otållJ~ilitý$t'~efÇ¡pitéll F'roj~c~ Sources of Funds Total S()Ùrcesof Funds ".,' Project To Date 1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999 . ..... '.--".-,. . . __ _'_,' d_....... .. "'-".- .----."'. ... ... ..,. ..... . --"..........,. $0 ' $100,000 $100,000 100,000 50,000 89,500 300,000 o o o o 200,000 o o 172,300 o $1,011,800 ., $1,525,000 $0 o 850,000 o 72,300 89.500 , .", ,. . '·$1,011.800 $1,525,000 $0 o o o o 100,000 65.000 o o o o o o o $165.000 ' $0 o 165,000 o o o $165,000 . :ürtal .. ....... ....... --. .' .,,- --, """"-'--"",.. ..-..........-..........,'....,..--,-.,....'........ ..... '.-,- ...-..-..... ',. -......-.........-.......-.-....... o '.., 325,OOÖ .... ',......_..',......-,.. ..... .,.,-.."...... ..,'.....'....,.,,'..,'.',..-,.,','......_. Oi~,099 o "<~9.!iOQ,' o ' 300,000 o 300,000 0265,000 o ' 25,OO()< o ' 50.0()() o . 200,000 o '2()0.()00 o ,.' ..' .'"...', 300,()0()) o ,,' '" """·"'·17?300 o >~()O,()()O $0 ',". $2,701;800 $0 o o o o o $556,640 300,000 1,015,000 268.360.. 72,300 489.500 $0 $2,701.800 ----------- ----------- . . - . Schedule 8 1996/97 Park and Recreation Development Fund Capital Projects Budget Summary Project Name Project To-Date A. B. $125,000 25,000 195,000 75,455 661,225 150,000 100,000 150,000 60,000 370,080 40,000 138,622 33,964 165,000 o 105,817 o 36,123 o 2,329,000 25,000 $4,785,286 $2,080,875 $1 ,664.045 $1.975.000d$10;505.206 Sources of Funds Project J-2:DAte 1992 Park Sales Tax Bonds 1994 Park Sales Tax Bonds Sales Tax Reserve for Ca ital Pro'ects TPWD Grant Funds Transfer - A uatic Park Interest Income $51,521 1,158,997 3,074,768 500,000 o o 1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999 " $200,000 ,', ':::: ':,' ' , d , , '1,500,000 : 105,000 '.., ,:,,' ,': :: ,: , , " o 88,000 :':,::: ,:::' 50,000 7,875 ,40,000 50,000 :,.".:' ,:::: 0 "'....:0 $1,300,000 o o o o o o o o 133,920 o 25,000 o o o o 150,125 5,000 50,000 o o $0 o o o 1,000,000 o o 900,000 o o o o 20,000 o o o o 5,000 50,000 o o 19.96119.9.I j_9.97/1998 1998/199.9 $0 o 1,664,045 o o o $0 o 1,975,000 o o o :üúa.I ....'..,-.............'.-.. .........,.-..... .... ,......"...---. .... ..--........."-...-.. ....."....-..... ......,-...... ',',',',..-........... ..,............ '-. ............ '-,' ,.. ,.. .... .............-.-......... .....-.-......".. ...,-....... .....-..........."......... ...._--........................-. ·."'.:.·.,~1~6~.~.qt):º' 111!1!I:l·1111 .....·:'.H::,:1~~$1.Î~25:.: ':.:.:.:.:\:::1.6~O,()OO '::'::<":.:>::'~O~;OQO:,: :..................~.,o~g:g'gg... 1I,I,I¡,,;,i,!,¡~t¡lili '..'. '::::::9'''3''9' '6'''4' .....................:.....~.~~:()()()... .·.'.:.'...<JI8,OQO·,: ", ",·:,"·:::1'5" 5' "'8'1" 7' , :}\}){:::::::::.,.. ., - -, ,', .:,", ..........................;.~::~~~... )150,000. ,<2329000· :';':"'::"'.''''-'''..'' ·>25,000 . . "......... ,.-, ,', " . :üúa.I ., --. ..,,_. . ,... ......."...,. ....','.._. ..._,-.... .... ..... .......... ... -,. ..",........._-, -, .. "....,._". .. ,_.... ·>tì51,521 »1,158,997' . ".dll.~00,488... >/.500;000· 292,200 "'P2Q2,OOO $4,785.286 ." $2.080.875 ' --11.664.045 $1.975.000$10.505.206· . Sched u Ie 9 1996/97 CIP Person n.el . Budget Summary Project To Date ~l19.9I 1997/1998 1998/1999 :ürtal CIP Personnel A General CIP Personnel § $192,695 § a $192,69~ 8. Utility CIP Personnel 135,875 135.875 C. Utility Construction Personnel 598,018 , 598,018 > .'.'.,',.,.. .. , .-...., , $0 $926,588 $0 $0 ,. ·'..$926,58$ Sources of Funds CIP Personnel General CIP Personnel I $gll> $192,69511 $g I $gl $192,695 Unspecified Utility CIP 733,8931 733,893 - ... T otat SC)ul'cesofFunds $0 $926,588, ' , $0' ""$0 ' '$926.588 --------" --------- . -- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Approve Cross Connection Control Subject: Program - Ordinance No 2138 Agenda Number: 8/26/96 GN 96-103 Council Meeting Date: The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) is now requiring all municipalities and water purveyors to follow certain procedures in further protecting our drinking water. The new rules require a "Water Service Inspection Certification" be filled out on all new service connections. Also, the TNRCC is requiring a "Backflow Prevention Assembly Test" be run on all new backflow prevention devices which are installed. The City will need to keep a copy of all these reports for at least three years readily available for the TNRCC to inspect. Ordinance No. 2138 basically follows the TNRCC rules with some minor clarification. The ordinance should not cause the City to incur additional costs except in record keeping. Any future backflow assembly test devices installed on high health hazard customer lines will require an annual test be run to certify it is operating within specifications. The expense for the annual tests will be the customer's responsibility. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve and adopt Ordinance No. 2138. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Ot r Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of . . , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 2138 CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL ORDINANCE By the terms of Chapter 290.44 Rules and Regulations for Public Water Systems, State of Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission, it is the responsibility of the City of North Richland Hills Public Works Department to protect its drinking water by instituting and enforcing a cross connection control program. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS, that this ordinance is hereby adopted to that end, as follows: Section # 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 Section # 200 205 210 215 220 Section # 300 305 310 Section # 400 405 410 415 ARTICLE 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS Description Title Definition of Terms Authority of Requirements Purpose of Ordinance Policy Jurisdiction and Applicability Conflicts with Public and Private Provisions General Construction of Language Conformance with Applicable Rules & Regulations Page 1-1 1-1 1-5 1-5 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 ARTICLE 2 - BACKFLOW AND SIPHONAGE PREVENTION PROGRAM Description Installation Provisions Testing Requirements Tester Qualifications Tester Equipment Test Report Page 2-1 2-1 2-1 2-2 2-2 ARTICLE 3 - CUSTOMER SERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM Description Inspection Requirements Inspector Qualifications Inspection Certification Report Page 3-1 3-1 3-1 ARTICLE 4 - CLOSING PROVISION Description Responsibilities Enforcement and Penalties Saving Clause Effective Date Page 4-1 4-1 4-2 4-2 . . , City of North Richland Hills, Texas Cross Connection Control Ordinance ARTICLE 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 100 - Title These regulations shall hereinafter be known, cited, and referred to as the Cross Connection Control Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas and shall be included as a part of the Code of Ordinances for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. Section 105 - Definition of Terms 1. Approved Backflow Prevention Assembly or Backflow Assembly or Assembly- means an assembly to counteract backpressure or prevent backsiphonage. This assembly must appear on the list of approved assemblies issued by the City of North Richland Hills Public Works Department. a. Reduced Pressure Principle Backflow Prevention Assembly or Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly or RP Assembly or RP - shall mean an assembly containing two independently acting approved check valves together with a hydraulically operated, mechanically independent pressure differential relief valve located between the valves and at the same time below the first check valve. The assembly shall include properly located test cocks and tightly closing shut-off valves at the end of the assembly. b. Reduced Pressure Principle Detector Backflow Prevention Assembly or Reduced Pressure Detector or RPDA - means an assembly composed of line-size approved reduced pressure principle assembly with a bypass containing a specific water meter and an approved reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly. The meter shall register accurately for very low rates of flow. c. Double Check Valve Backflow Prevention Assembly or Double Check Assembly or Double Check or DC - means an assembly which consists of two independently operating check valves which are spring loaded or weighted. The assembly comes complete with a gate valve on each side of the checks, as well as test cocks to test the checks for tightness. d. Double Check Detector Backflow Prevention Assembly or Double Check Detector or DCDA - means an assembly composed of line-size approved double check assembly with bypass containing a specific water meter and an approved double check valve assembly. The meter shall register accurately for very low rates of flow. Page 1-1 . . , City of North Richland Hills, Texas Cross Connection Control Ordinance e. Pressure Vacuum Breaker Backflow Prevention Assembly or Pressure Vacuum Breaker or PVB - an assembly which protects against backsiphonage, but does not provide adequate protection against backpressure backflow. The assembly is a combination of a single check valve with an A VB and can be used with downstream shutoff valves. In addition, the assembly has suction and discharge gate valves and test cocks which allows the full testing of the assembly. f. Spill-Resistant Pressure Vacuum Breaker or SVB - an assembly containing an independently operating, internally loaded check valve and independently operating, loaded air inlet valve located on the discharge side of the check valve. This assembly is to be equipped with a properly located test cock and shutoff valves on the suction and discharge ports of the assembly. g. Atmospheric Vacuum Breaker Backflow Prevention Device or Atmospheric Vacuum Breaker or AVB - this device cannot be tested and cannot prevent back pressure backflow, but is used to prevent backsiphonage in nonhealth hazard conditions. h. Air Gap - a physical separation between the free flowing discharge end of a potable water supply piping and/or appurtenance and an open or nonpressure receiving vessel, plumbing fixture or other device. An "approved air gap separation" shall be at least double the diameter of the supply pipe measured vertically above the overflow rim of the vessel, plumbing fixture or other device - in no case less than one inch. 2. Auxiliary Supply - means any water source or system other than the public water system, that may be available in the building or on the property. 3. Backflow - means the flow in the direction opposite to the normal flow or the introduction of any foreign liquids, gases, or substances into the City's water system. 4. Backpressure - any elevation of pressure in the downstream piping system (by any means) above the supply pressure at the point of consideration which would cause, or tend to cause, a reversal of the normal direction of flow and the introduction of fluids, mixtures or substances from any source other than the intended source. 5. Backsiphonage - the flow of water or other liquids, mixture or substances into the distribution pipes of a potable water supply system from any source other than its intended source caused by a sudden reduction of pressure in the potable water supply system. Page 1-2 . . , City of North Richland Hílls, Texas Cross Connection Control Ordinance 6. Boresight or Boresight to Daylight - means providing adequate drainage for backflow prevention assemblies installed in vaults through the use of an unobstructed drain pipe. 7. City - means the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. 8. Commission - Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC). 9. Contamination - means the entry into or presence in a public water supply system of any substance which may be deleterious to health and/or the quality of the water. 10. Cross Connection - means any physical arrangement where a potable water supply is connected, directly or indirectly (actual or potential), with any other non- drinkable water system, used water system, or auxiliary water supply, sewer, drain conduit, swimming pool, storage reservoir, plumbing fixture, swamp coolers, air condition units, fire protection system, or any other assembly which contains, or may contain, contaminated water, sewage, or other liquid of unknown or unsafe quality which may be capable of imparting contamination into the public water system as a result of backflow. Bypass arrangements, jumper connections, removable sections, swivel or changeover assemblies, or other temporary or permanent assemblies through which, or because of which, backflow may occur are considered to be cross connections. 11. Degree of Hazard - means the low or high hazard classification that shall be attached to all actual or potential cross connections. a. High Hazard - means the classification assigned to an actual or potential cross connection that potentially can allow a substance to backflow into the potable water supply that may cause illness or death. b. Low Hazard - means the classification assigned to an actual or potential cross connection that potentially could allow a substance that may be objectionable but not hazardous to a human's health to backflow into the potable water supply. c. Health Hazard - means an actual or potential threat of contamination of a physical or toxic nature to the public potable water system or the consumer's potable water system that would be a danger to health. d. Plumbing Hazard - means an internal or plumbing-type cross connection in a consumer's potable water system that may be either a pollution or a contamination hazard. Page 1-3 . . , City of North Richland Hills, Texas Cross Connection Control Ordinance e. Pollution Hazard - means an actual or potential threat to the physical properties of the water system or the potability of the public or the consumer's potable water system but which would not constitute a health or system hazard, as defined. The maximum degree of intensity of the pollution to which the potable water system could be degraded under this definition would cause a nuisance or be aesthetically objectionable or could cause minor damage to the system or its appurtenances. f. System Hazard - means an actual or potential threat of severe danger to the physical properties of the public or consumer's potable water supply or of a pollution or contamination that would have a detrimental effect on the quality of the potable water in the system. 12. Director - means the City's Director of the Public Works Department who is vested with the authority and responsibility for the implementation of an effective cross connection control program for the City and for the enforcement of the provisions of this ordinance. 13. Non-Residential Use - shall include all uses not specifically included in "residential uses" defined under Residential Use. 14. Point-of-Use Isolation - means the appropriate backflow prevention within the consumer's water system at the point at which the actual or potential cross connection exists. 15. Potable Water Supply - means any water supply intended or used for human consumption or other domestic use. 16. Premises - means any piece of property to which water is provided, including all improvements, mobile structures, and structures located on it. 17. Premises Isolation - means the appropriate backflow prevention at the service connection between the public water system and the water user. 18. Public Water System or System - means any public or privately owned water system which supplies water for public domestic use. The system must meet all the health requirements set forth by the TNRCC. The system will include all services, reservoirs, facilities, and any equipment used in the process of producing, treating, storing, or conveying water for public consumption. 19. Public Works - means the Public Works Department of the City of North Richland Hills or designee. Page 1-4 . City of North Richland Hills, Texas Cross Connection Control Ordinance 20. Recognized Tester - means a person that is a State certified backflow prevention assembly tester. a. General Tester - is qualified to test backflow prevention assemblies on any domestic, commercial, industrial or irrigation service except firelines. b. Fireline Tester - is qualified to test backflow prevention assemblies on firelines only. The State Fire Marshall's office requires that a person performing maintenance on firelines must be employed by an Approved Fireline Contractor. 21. Representative of the Water System - a person designated by the City of North Richland Hills to perform cross connection control duties that shall include, but are not limited to, cross connection inspections and water use surveys. 22. Residential Use - shall include single family dwellings, duplexes, multiplex, housing and apartments where the individual units are each on a separate meter or the units are full-time dwellings in cases where two or more units are served by one meter. . 23. 24. 25. 26. Service Connection - is the point of delivery at which the water purveyor lo~es control of the water. Thennal Expansion - means heated water that does not have the space to expand. TNRCC - Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. Used Water - means water supplied by a pubic water system to a water user's system after it has passed through the service connection. Section 110 - Authority of Requirements This ordinance is adopted under the authority of the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas, as promulgated by Chapter 212 of the Texas Local Government Code, as heretofore, or hereinafter amended. This ordinance is adopted pursuant to the provisions of Article XIV of the Home Rule Charter for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. Section 115 - Purpose of Ordinance The regulations contained herein are adopted to achieve the following purposes and shall be administered so as to: , 1. Promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the City; and Page 1-5 . . , City of North Richland Hills, Texas Cross Connection Control Ordinance 2. Promote and encourage the proper use and control of the City's water distribution system; and 3. Protect the public water in the City's water system from contamination or pollution due to any existing or potential cross connections. Section 120 - Policy It is hereby declared to be the policy of the City to have initially inspected all backflow prevention assemblies and all plumbing on new homes for cross connections. All backflow prevention assemblies which are installed to provide protection against high health hazard will be tested annually. Section 125 - Jurisdiction and Applicability These rules and regulations contained herein shall apply to all backflow prevention assemblies and water service connections to be installed in the future as new or as a replacement within the service area or city limits of the City of North Richland Hills. Section 130 - Conflicts with Public and Private Provisions Except where indicated, these regulations are not intended to; 1. Interfere with, abrogate, or annul any other public ordinance, rule or regulation, statute, or other provision of law. 2. Abrogate any easement, deed restriction, covenant or any other private agreement or deed restriction. Section 135 - General Construction of Language Unless the context clearly indicates to the contrary, words used in the present tense include the future tense; works used in the plural number include the singular; the word "herein" means "in these regulations"; and the word "regulations" means "these regulations; a "person" includes a corporation, a partnership, and an incorporated association of persons such as a club; and "shall" is always mandatory. Section 140 - Conformance with Applicable Rules and Regulations These regulations herein shall be held to be the minimum requirements concerning cross connections and backflow prevention. In addition to these requirements, each water customer of the city shall be in conformance with all applicable County, State, and Federal laws. Page 1-6 . . , City of North Richland Hills, Texas Cross Connection Control Ordinance ARTICLE 2 - BACKFLOW AND SIPHONAGE PREVENTION PROGRAM Section 200 - Installation Provisions No water connection from a public drinking water supply system shall be made to any establishment where an actual or potential contamination or system hazard exists without an air gap separation between the drinking water supply and the source of potential contamination. The containment air gap is sometimes impractical and, instead, reliance must be placed on individual "internal" air gaps or mechanical backflow prevention devices. Under these conditions, additional protection shall be required at the meter in the form of a backflow prevention device (in accordance with AWWA Standards C510 and C511, and AWWA Manual M14) on those establishments handling substances deleterious or hazardous to the public health. The City need not require backflow protection at the water service entrance if an adequate cross connection control program is in effect that includes an annual inspection and testing by a certified backflow prevention device tester. It will be the responsibility of the City to ensure that these requirements are met. It is the water customers responsibility to coordinate and pay for any required annual inspections. No water connection from any public drinking water supply system shall be made to any condensing, cooling, or industrial process or any other system of nonpotable usage over which the public water supply system officials do not have sanitary control, unless the said connection is made in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (1) of this section. Water from such systems cannot be returned to the potable water supply. Overhead bulk water dispensing stations must be provided with an air gap between the filling outlet hose and the receiving tank to protect against back siphonage and cross- contamination. The use of a backflow prevention device at the service connection shall be considered as additional backflow protection and shall not negate the use of backflow protection on internal hazards as outlined and enforced by local plumbing codes. Section 205 - Testing Requirements All backflow prevention assemblies shall be tested upon installation by a recognized backflow prevention assembly tester and certified to be operating within the specifications. Backflow prevention assemblies which are installed to provide protection against high health hazards must also be tested and certified to be operating within specifications at least annually by a recognized backflow prevention device tester. The water customer will coordinate and pay these annual tests. The City will be notified prior to the annual tests being conducted so they can be present when they are run. Page 2-1 City of North Richland Hills, Texas . Tester Qualifications Recognized testers shall have completed a Commission approved course on cross connection control and backflow prevention and pass an examination administered by the TNRCC or its designated agent. The accredited tester classification shall be broken down into two categories: Cross Connection Control Ordinance 1. The "General Tester" is qualified to test and repair backflow prevention assemblies on any domestic, commercial, industrial or irrigation service except firelines. 2. The "Fireline Tester" is qualified to test and repair backflow prevention assemblies on firelines only. The State Fire Marshall office requires that a person performing maintenance on firelines must be employed by an Approved Fireline Contractor. Individuals that can show proof of completion of a course and passage of an exam based on the ABPA or ASSE National exam, prior to the effective date of these regulations, may be recognized as accredited for the term of their current certification (not to exceed 3 years). Section 215 - Test Equipment . Gauges used in the testing of backflow prevention assemblies shall be tested for accuracy annually in accordance with the University of Southern California's Foundation of Cross Connection Control and Hydraulic Research and/or the American Water Works Association Manual of Cross Connection Control (Manual M-14). Testers shall include test gauge serial numbers on "Test and Maintenance" report forms. Section 220 - Test Report A Backflow Prevention Assembly Test and Maintenance Report must be completed by the recognized backflow prevention assembly tester for each assembly tested. The signed and dated original must be submitted to the City Water Department for record keeping purposes. Should the tester choose to use a report format which differs from that found in this Section, it must minimally contain all information required by the report form. Test and maintenance reports shall be retained for a minimum of three years. The public water supplier must provide these records to commission staff for inspection upon request. , Page 2-2 . . , CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS (PWS I.D. #2200063) BACKFlOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY TEST and MAINTENANCE REPORT (North Richland Hills City Limits) The following form must be completed for each assembly tested. A signed and dated original must be submitted to the public water supplier for record keeping purposes. The backflow prevention assembly detailed below has been tested and maintained as required by TNRCC regulations and is certified to be operating within acceptable parameters. TYPE OF ASSEMBLY o o Reduced Pressure Principle 0 Double Check Valve 0 Pressure Vacuum Breaker Atmosphere Vacuum Breaker Manufacturer: Model Number: Serial Number: Located At: Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly Pressure Vacuum Breaker Double Check Valve Assembly Air Inlet Check Valve Relief 1 st Check 2nd Check Valve Opened at psid psid Initial Test DC-Closed Closed Tight 0 Opened at Tight 0 psid Did not open 0 Leaked 0 RP-_ psid leaked 0 leaked 0 Repairs & Materials Used Test after DC-Closed Closed Tight 0 Opened at Opened at psid Repair Tight 0 psid psid RP -_psid The above is certified to be true. Firm Name & Address: Certified Tester: (Print Name) Certified Tester No. (Signature) (Date) Test Gauge Serial No. Page 2-3 PW002.WPD . . , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS (PWS I.D. #2200063) BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY TEST and MAINTENANCE REPORT (Watauga City Limits) The following form must be completed for each assembly tested. A signed and dated original must be submitted to the public water supplier for record keeping purposes. The backflow prevention assembly detailed below has been tested and maintained as required by TNRCC regulations and is certified to be operating within acceptable parameters. TYPE OF ASSEMBLY o o Reduced Pressure Principle 0 Double Check Valve 0 Pressure Vacuum Breaker Atmosphere Vacuum Breaker Manufacturer: Model Number: Serial Number: Located At: Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly Pressure Vacuum Breaker Double Check Valve Assembly Air Inlet Check Valve Relief 1 st Check 2nd Check Valve Opened at psid psid Initial Test DC-Closed Closed Tight 0 Opened at Tight 0 psid Did not open 0 Leaked 0 RP-_ psid Leaked 0 Leaked 0 Repairs & Materials Used Test after DC-Closed Closed Tight 0 Opened at Opened at psid Repair Tight 0 psid psid RP -_psid The above is certified to be true. Firm Name & Address: Certified Tester: (Print Name) Certified Tester No. (Signature) (Date) Test Gauge Serial No. Page 2-4 PW002a. WPD '. . , City of Norlh Richland Hills, Texas Cross Connection Control Ordinance ARTICLE 3 - CUSTOMER SERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM Section 300 - Inspection Requirements A customer service inspection certification shall be completed prior to providing continuous water service to new construction, on any existing service when the water purveyor has reason to believe that cross connections or other unacceptable plumbing practices exist. or after any material improvement, correction, or addition to the private plumbing facilities. Section 305 - Inspector Qualifications Individuals with the following credentials shall be recognized as capable of conducting a customer service inspection certification: 1. Plumbing Inspectors and Water Supply Protection Specialists licensed by the Texas State Board of Plumbing Examiners. 2. Certified Waterworks Operators and members of other water related professional groups who have completed a training course. passed an examination administered by the Commission or its designated agent, and hold an endorsement granted by the Commission or its designated agent. 3. Licensed Plumbers may perform customer service inspections on single family residential services. Section 310 - Inspection Certification Report Copies of properly completed Water Service Inspection Certifications will be kept on file by the City and made available. upon request, for Commission review. The certifications shall be retained for a minimum of ten years. If the certification form included in this Section is not used, the Inspection Certifications must minimally include the name and registration number of the inspector. the type of registration (Plumbing Inspectors, Water Supply Protection Specialists, Certified Operator, etc.) and be dated and signed. It must also certify that: 1. No direct connection between the public drinking water supply and a potential source of contamination exists. Potential sources of contamination are isolated from the public water system by an air-gap or an appropriate backflow prevention assembly in accordance with state plumbing regulation. Additionally, all pressure relief valves and thermal expansion devices are in compliance with state plumbing codes. 2. No cross connection between the public drinking water supply and a private water source exists. Where an actual air gap is not maintained between the public water supply and private water supply, an approved reduced pressure-zone backflow Page 3-1 . . , City of North Richland Hills, Texas Cross Connection Control Ordinance prevention assembly is properly installed and a service agreement exists for annual inspection and testing by a recognized backflow prevention assembly tester. 3. No connection exists which would allow the return of water used for condensing, cooling, or industrial processes back to the public water supply. 4. No pipe or pipe fitting which contains more than 8.0% percent lead exists in private plumbing facilities installed on or after July 1, 1988. 5. No solder or flux which contains more than 0.02% percent lead exists in private plumbing facilities installed on or after July 1, 1988. 6. No plumbing fixture is installed which is not in compliance with the state-approved plumbing code. Page 3-2 . . , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS WATER SERVICE INSPECTION CERTIFICATION NRH City Limits Name of PWS: CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS. TEXAS PWS 1.0. # 2200063 Location of Service: Address: Subdivision: Lot Block I, , upon inspection of the private plumbing facilities connected (Print Name) to the aforementioned public water supply do hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge: 1. Compliance Non-Compliance No direct connection between the public drinking water supply and aDD potential source of contamination exists. Potential sources of contamination are isolated from the public water system by an air gap or an appropriate backflow prevention assembly in accordance with state plumbing regulations. Additionally, all pressure relief valves and thermal expansion devices are in compliance with state plumbing codes. No cross-connection between the public drinking water supply and a private 0 0 water system exists. Where an actual air gap is not maintained between the public water supply and a private water supply, an approved reduced pressure- zone backflow prevention assembly is properly installed and a service agreement exists for annual inspection and testing by a certified backflow prevention device tester. No connection exists which would allow the return of water used for 0 0 condensing, cooling or industrial processes back to the public water supply. No pipe or pipe fitting which contains more than 8.0% lead exists in private plumbing facilities installed on or after July 1, 1988. No solder or flux which contains more than 0.2% lead exists in private 0 0 plumbing facilities installed on or after July 1, 1988. No plumbing fixture is installed which is not in compliance with a state 0 0 approved plumbing code. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Water service shall not be provided or restored to the private plumbing facilities until the above conditions are determined to be in compliance. I further certify that the following materials were used in the installation of the plumbing facilities: Service lines: Lead 0 Solder: Lead 0 Copper Lead Free PVC 0 Solvent Weld 0 o o Other 0 Other 0 I recognize that this document shall become a permanent record of the aforementioned Public Water System. Signature of Inspector Registration Number Title Type of Registration Date 7:Ð1 N.E. loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 817.581-5500 PWOO1 (12195) Page 3-3 . . , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS WATER SERVICE INSPECTION CERTIFICATION Watauga City Limits Name of PWS: CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS. TEXAS PWS 1.0. # 2200063 Location of Service: Address: Subdivision: Lot Block I, , upon inspection of the private plumbing facilities connected (Print Name) to the aforementioned public water supply do hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge: 1. Compliance Non-Compliance No direct connection between the public drinking water supply and aDO potential source of contamination exists. Potential sources of contamination are isolated from the public water system by an air gap or an appropriate backflow prevention assembly in accordance with state plumbing regulations. Additionally, all pressure relief valves and thermal expansion devices are in compliance with state plumbing codes. No cross-connection between the public drinking water supply and a private 0 0 water system exists. Where an actual air gap is not maintained between the public water supply and a private water supply, an approved reduced pressure- zone backflow prevention assembly is properly installed and a service agreement exists for annual inspection and testing by a certified backflow prevention device tester. No connection exists which would allow the return of water used for 0 0 condensing, cooling or industrial processes back to the public water supply. No pipe or pipe fitting which contains more than 8.0% lead exists in private plumbing facilities installed on or after July 1, 1988. No solder or flux which contains more than 0.2% lead exists in private 0 0 plumbing facilities installed on or after July 1, 1988. No plumbing fixture is installed which is not in compliance with a state 0 0 approved plumbing code. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Water service shall not be provided or restored to the private plumbing facilities until the above conditions are determined to be in compliance. I further certify that the following materials were used in the installation of the plumbing facilities: Service lines: Lead 0 Solder: Lead 0 Copper Lead Free PVC 0 Solvent Weld 0 o o Other 0 Other 0 I recognize that this document shall become a permanent record of the aforementioned Public Water System. Signature of Inspector Registration Number Title Type of Registration Date -m1 N.E. Loop 820, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 8171581-5600 PW 003 (5196) Page 3-4 . . , City of North Richland Hills, Texas Cross Connection Control Ordinance ARTICLE 4 - CLOSING PROVISIONS Section 400 - Responsibilities It is the responsibility of all property owners and their tenants and occupants to abide by the conditions of this ordinance. In the event of any changes to the plumbing system, it is the responsibility of the property owners to notify the City. All costs associated with this ordinance and the purchase, installation, testing, and repair of devices is the responsibility of the property owner and their renters. Section 405 - Enforcement and Penalties 1. The Director and the City Attorney, and each of them, are hereby authorized to enforce the provisions of this ordinance by anyone or more of the enforcement mechanisms set forth in this ordinance. 2. The representatives of the water system or agents of the City charged with enforcement of this ordinance shall be deemed to be performing a governmental function for the benefit of the general public and neither the City, the Director nor representative of the water system or agent of the City engaged in inspection or endorsement activities under this ordinance when acting in good faith and without malice shall ever be held liable for any loss or damage, whether real or asserted, caused, or alleged to have been caused, as a result of the performance of such governmental function. 3. Failure on the part of any customer to discontinue the use of all cross connections and to physically separate cross connections is sufficient cause for the immediate discontinuance of public water service to the premises. (Rules and Regulations for Public Water Systems, Texas Water Commission Water Utilities Division Chapter 290.44(h).) 4. Failure to comply with this ordinance is a criminal offense. 5. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects, or refuses to comply with, or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance and this code shall be fined not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. 6. Any persons violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall become civilly liable to the City for any expense, loss or damage occasioned by the City by reason of such violation. Page 4-1 . . , City of North Richland Hills, Texas Cross Connection Control Ordinance In addition to the penalties provided herein, the City may recover reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, court reporters' fees and other expenses of litigation by appropriate suit against the person found to have violated this ordinance or the orders, rules, regulations, and permits issued hereunder. Section 410 - Saving Clause That if any provision, section, sentence, clause, or phase of this ordinance or the application of same to any person or set of circumstances are for any reason held to be unconstitutional, void, invalid, or for any reason unenforceable, the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby, it being the intent of the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills in adopting and the Mayor approving this ordinance that no portion hereof or provision or regulation contained herein shall become inoperative or fail by reason of any unconstitutionality or validity of any other portion, provision, or regulation. Section 415 - Effective Date This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of its passage by City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ,1996. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City Page 4-2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS IDepartment: Subject: Administration Council Meeting Date: Supporting the Reauthorization of the Intermodal A.genda Number: Surface Transportation Efficiency Act - Resolution No. 96-57 8/26/96 GN 96-105 Mayor Brown asked that the attached Resolution be forwarded for Council consideration. The Resolution supports the reauthorization of the ISTEA Act. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve Resolution No. 96-57. . Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget _ .her _ . dtci ~ Department Head Signature CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM Flllllftce Director Page 1 of . RESOLUTION NO. 96-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS IN SUPPORT OF REAUTHORIZATION OF THE INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991. WHEREAS, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) was enacted by the Congress of the United States of America in order to consolidate transportation planning, improve transportation activity efficiency and to further incorporate air quality and environmental concerns into comprehensive transportation programs; WHEREAS, ISTEA granted designated Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) with greater decision-making authority in regional planning activities enhancing region-wide cooperation in the planning and implementation of transportation projects; WHEREAS, ISTEA created the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) program which funds activities designed to alleviate problems faced by the people of Tarrant County; . WHEREAS, ISTEA established the framework for designating the National Highway System, created a spirit of intermodalism in transportation, allows flexible funding mechanisms, solidified the partnership between local governments, the Texas Department of Transportation, transportation authorities and MPOs and increased public involvement in transportation planning; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of North Richland Hills does hereby support the reauthorization of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 in order to continue effective, comprehensive surface transportation planning. PASSED AND APPROVED this 26TH day of August, 1996. Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: . Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City ., . " CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: Supporting H.R. 842 Truth In Transportation Budgeting Agenda Number: Act - Kesolutlon No. 9ö-b4 8/26/96 GN 96-106 Subject: Mayor Brown asked that the attached Resolution be forwarded for Council consideration. The Resolution supports restricting the use of dedicated transportation funds for transportation purposes and supports H.R. 842, Truth In Transportation Budgeting Act. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve Resolution No. 96-54. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Fund h~ting Budget = ~áZ/2t¿¡tt: ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM Finance Director Page 1 of " · · · > . RESOLUTION NO. 96-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RESTRICTING THE USE OF DEDICATED TRANSPORTATION FUNDS FOR TRANSPORTATION PURPOSES AND IN SUPPORT OF H.R. 842, TRUTH IN TRANSPORTATION BUDGETING ACT. WHEREAS, one of the greatest challenges facing all levels of government - local, state, and federal - today and well into the next century is the continued cost of providing a safe efficient highway transportation system; and WHEREAS, the federal transportation program is comprised of revenues sources which finances a dedicated trust fund for use for transportation purposes which cannot be used for other purposes; and WHEREAS, due to growing debt, both at the state and federal level, transportation funds have been used to help offset federal debt and state criminal justice costs; and WHEREAS, the long term benefit from current capital investment for transportation extends well beyond twenty years and is more cost efficient at today's transportation infrastructure construction costs; and WHEREAS, the future economic growth of Texas must be supported by adequately maintained transportation infrastructure systems; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of North Richland Hills does hereby support restricting the use of dedicated transportation funds for transportation purposes and further supports the passage of U.S. Congress H.R. 842, Truth in Transportation Budgeting Act. PASSED AND APPROVED this 26TH day of August, 1996. Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: Supporting the Removal of the Sunset Provision A[enda Number: of the Grime Control and Prevention Act - Resolution No. 96-55 8/26/96 GN 96-107 Subject: Mayor Brown asked that the attached Resolution be forwarded for Council consideration. The Resolution supports the removal of the 5-year sunset provision of the Crime Control and Prevention District Act. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve Resolution No. 96-55. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget _ ~ ~~ -ßut:~ C . ~ Department Head Signature ity Manager CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM Page 1 of FINII1œ Director · · · Of' ." .. RESOLUTION NO. 96-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS IN SUPPORT OF REMOVING THE SUNSET PROVISION FROM THE CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION ACT. WHEREAS, through the creation of Crime Control and Prevention District Act by the Legislature of the State of Texas, municipalities have been empowered to address criminal justice issues from a community-based funding source; and WHEREAS, the legislative intent of allowing municipalities to establish special crime control districts to fund the increasing cost of fighting crime and protecting citizens has been successfully achieved by many municipalities through the creation of such districts; and WHEREAS, by removing the 5 year sunset provision of the Crime Control and Prevention District Act, municipalities will be able to ensure the continued success of the activities funded through the special district; and WHEREAS, as the population of Texas becomes increasingly urban, the burden of local government to protect our citizens from criminals and to preserve safe livable neighborhoods for all people - including our elderly and children - is critical to the future of our state; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of North Richland Hills does hereby support removing the sunset provision from the Crime Control and Prevention District Act (Article 2370c-4, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). PASSED AND APPROVED this 26TH day of August, 1996. Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City .. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Supporting the Establishment of a North Texas Tollway Authority - Resolution No. ijö-bö Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: 8/26/96 GN 96-108 Subject: Mayor Brown asked that the attached Resolution be forwarded for Council consideration. The Resolution supports the establishment of a North Texas Tollway Authority. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve Resolution No. 96-56. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget _ ~azw¿'d- ~ Cg~~ G.A.-v\ Department Head Signature \--4!'''-~~y Manag~r CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM Finance Director Page 1 of · · · RESOLUTION NO. 96-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS IN SUPPORT OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A NORTH TEXAS TOLLWAY AUTHORITY. WHEREAS, the Sunset Advisory Commission is reviewing the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and the Texas Turnpike Authority (TTA) and there is legislative intent to consolidate the two agencies; and WHEREAS, North Texas mobility would be best served by the North Texas assets and operations of the TTA remaining in the Dallas-Fort Worth region; and WHEREAS, continued efficient toll road development is an integral component of the regional mobility plan for North Texas; and WHEREAS, a tollway authority in Austin within or closely associated with TxDOT can be established to serve the tollway needs of Texas outside of Harris County and the Dallas-Fort Worth region; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of North Richland Hills: (1) that the counties of Collin, Dallas, Denton and Tarrant be and hereby are encouraged to work together to establish a North Texas Tollway Authority; (2) that the Sunset Advisory Commission, TxDOT, TTA and the Texas Legislature be and hereby are urged to support the establishment of a North Texas Tollway Authority which incorporates the assets, liabilities and operations of the existing TTA; (3) that the copies of this resolution be furnished to the Sunset Advisory Commission, the leaders and district representatives of the Texas House and Texas Senate, TxDOT, TTA and the North Texas Tollway Coalition. PASSED AND APPROVED this 26TH day of August, 1996. Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS epartment: Administration Council Meeting Date: 8/26/96 Contract Authorizing NETS Funding Agenda Number: GN 96-109 A contract proposal between the City of North Richland Hills and the Texas Department of Transportation has been received providing for the continuation of funding for the Northeast Transportation Service. The terms of the contract are the same as last year and the contract is one year in length. State funding in the amount of $123,300 is provided for NETS, with the City acting as a pass-through conduit for the funds. No City funding is required to administer the contract. This contract does not effect the City's budgeted participation in NETS, which is 50¢ per capita. Recommendation: \ Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ rn~ . Ie (JfiIl<.. rt~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of :.·,·r' .' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance /Information Services Council Meeting Date: 8/26/96 Subject: Award Bid for Computer Editing System Agenda Number: PU 96-63 Formal bids were solicited for a computer editing system and the results are attached. This system will provide Citicable better video quality and greater productivity. The bid submitted by Videotex Systems did not meet the minimum specifications on a video cameralrecorder with adapter. MZB Video Solutions no bid several items but did meet the specifications for the video camera/recorder. Videotex Systems met all the general conditions of the bid and can deliver the equipment in three weeks. Fundinq Source: There are sufficient funds available in Information Services Video Equipment account. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for a computer editing system to Videotex Systems in the amount of $21,002.69 and award the bid for a video camera/recorder to MZB Video Solutions in the amount of $13,300. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget -1L Other ,() _ [)) /~ / ~_/ ~mentHeatt~i~ture ~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number 16-01-03-6450 Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director Page 1 of / Computer Editing System . Description 1. Scanner w/Adobe Photoshop 2. Truevision Targa Pro Video Card 3. PC Workstation wlWindows 4. 17" Computer Monitor 5. Diamond Stealth Display Card 6. 9 Gig SCSI Hard Drive 7. Roland Audio Monitor 8. UVW 1800 Betacam w/ mount 9. UVW 100 Camera/Recorder .10. 19" PVM 1340 Video Monitor 11. DPS - 230 TBC 12. Installation and Training Total Award . Bid 96-662 Videotex Systems ¡lli:¡i,I,ji'lililjiiil¡~¡lill~º!~IQI~Iil~ iilll¡¡¡iiiJ:[l¡i¡¡I:~~~~º!~iZ~III! ¡lli,i¡i,¡,I:llil~!II~~'~I¡~,~~º19¡¡1 ~1~j]IIJ!!¡j¡¡I¡ill~I~[~]~:~~~s~] 1~1¡¡¡¡!jl¡~!!II~!IJŽ~ª~Q~ ~il~¡j¡¡i¡I!llil!~~g~ZQº;[Q~ ~ill~illi!II~~W ~~,,'m!im!!!'~"'''''8'''''''!''2'''''''"9"·7!'1'0''''''0·~ Jj,~':;[:!¡i¡ii~¡¡;: , ':,,' ..l::? ) ~Þ/lIIII¡¡utllI!l¡'IIIòõiiI"""IoI..~iIhMII"',W ***$12,948.00 ..., '-. "I'I"·"!""-'·'''''''''~''''''''''';, ;"'''''''''''''' '"'' 783"00" ¡!"i!.' ,jjl~i'¡:' I t 'i¡JI~ ':1 ~1tl~¡~ill[ ¡¡;;"~:~!I''i'I'!'''': r,';ill]m~t~p,¡,~"''''!I!'1' "~r.6"'A~5"':::'110!'~""0'·"~!~! ,,,,,,'j'''lr~i.ct, I ~ ." Ji.¡¡¡Ji¡~i¡¡;l{jjll~i!IIIlI"¡¿'~!IIIIt"b:I.,I;! v::·'~:':~T!~!lnl'~'!1"1···.,t"""''"'-''''''''''¡>!r':''......,.,.j,þ ~ii';""'!:!¡ml!~li¡¡m,$~OO.OQ,!1 ".111'-1111, '."'$""'2"""~-",Oõ;~'_·'~ ''''','''., '69 '¡¡¡~"iH'1 .., "i' :¡m!Wihi¡;¡"~I,,*~¡,~l:,,,..~,¡.Jj¡(;¡;iIi:¡III¡¡ ***Does not meet minimum specifications MZB Video Solutions No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid $8,470.00 m~m!r:$1"3~r3'ÖÕ:,(fð:~1 lillfml'tL'.'<i~~'I"",ijf.L~""'iltli"i('tII~ÍlWI"I":!¡~ $815.00 $1,650.00 No Bid 1I~,,~ml!lm''''''::i.' '~'''.',ñ, ",""""""""',, "-"''',~ ',¡":,,;;,;\,, .'I~·;:'v. .. ,':! Illiit!üm¡lti(!:¡;'~i,I."'tl;!Qiº~i~QQJ¡ TM Television $870.00 $3,240.00 $1,890.00 $795.00 $525.00 $5,150.00 $110.00 No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid $1,257.50 0.00 Bid does not meet minimum specifications CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Public Works Council Meeting Date: 8/26/96 Subject: Award Bid for Street Reconstruction Agenda Number: PU 96-64 As approved at the February 12,1996 meeting, formal bids were solicited for the reconstruction of Deaver Drive (PW 96-09). The specifications requested bids for street excavation with lime stabilization and an alternate bid was requested for street excavation with stabilization using Roadbond EN1. The results are outlined below. Alternate Lowell Allison Contractors $18,554 $24,574 $25,810 $30,298 1:ì.:øZ,g JRJ Paving, Inc. No Bid Pavement Construction $22,310 APAC of Texas No Bid JRJ Paving has done several jobs for the City and all have been completed on time and within the budget amount. JRJ Paving, Inc. met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and can complete the project within two weeks. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for the reconstruction of Deaver Drive to JRJ Paving, Inc. in the amount of $14,734 Source of Funds: Bonds (GOIRev.) _ Operating Budget --2l at r Finance Review Acct. Number 22-60-01-4890 Sufficient Funds Available (' Finance Director ature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Approve Interlcoal Agreement with Tarrant County Subject: for the Construction of North Tarrant Parkway Agenda Number: 8/26/96 PW 96-44 Council Meeting Date: This agreement facilitates the construction of North Tarrant Parkway from Smithfield Road west approximately 2,900 feet to the end of the existing roadway. Commissioner Bob Hampton has agreed to construct the roadway and the cities of North Richland Hills and Keller have agreed to design and construct the box culvert and drainage improvements. This agreement is between North Richland Hills and Tarrant County and addresses the responsibility of each party. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve this agreement. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ r Acct. Number Sufficient Fun s Available ,. FlnllnC8 Director Page 1 of - , ~_._'~'>\:'<;¿~~:~j ',~,> //<:.-_~. \ ,\\,j \\' "~'. iii" I ~~7:'(7 -. .. .::--'~,/"_~'; ,.:,' , . " ", ,'k~,6:/' .~;:~~:://,// 1 / . .:;, . .. /,%>' .5 4- ~/,~::__u-::--~~?.-/.:,/// i i_oj ,- /.: ,~~\-\-7--"'~" i¡;-¡ 'jJ' .~__----,/~-' /=----',,/> / I . .'." /~" ":/~I',::~i.:----f..:d.~/_~--,i, ~~ , ,_ /--",,//;,./ < (./ /." 'W": / '''~' \'?:'"~'-'¡¿"'~f?;' ; -' /r,~/ , ,_~_.___/_"::::'_""'------- _ -:,_':';'>~"'?'- :___. ... \'\\ /'-1.," / / ' , _------,...- '''''''''..¡¡:-____~ .. ____."",.:..--- ,. \ . \ \, ¡. r I ,.:' '/___'__~'" ,._:,,~ '\ / . ','- ~ ....- ..·,"/':"X'\:·ë:;:: ) : ~_'" ..-.r-- "',', .N' ,'.,...,.,p.:,¿. ....." .',' tr,~ I , \- k~. \,.,....... \ / ;c-'¿;.-j ,-' "'-----~ ~\\ .., '.\ I"~· / _.. '''''~' ,.~ I_~"'.'/ _- '<' \ ..,h ' / ::.-::-=;:;S~,:.,,\:,,:.~c:;.::<·::> '? .... ;'-'\ \ib ~j </ -..-----.'.,f:'-<:"\ '.' \ '-'.',.,' ~ '. .., d r#K'Î \ ~, ""','" "\ ' ._------. '__~ \ " ,I'i \",''' l '\/ ,: ,~¿. ~ ,¡).. I'" ,I', . . I . \ '. .,' : "" , ,o,~ I .._.. :?' '-",,; I ,~" ~ " ' \"">;::-'\'. ' ',o¡, IV ;' / I"'" -.., .. ",' :,.", ','~ .~~/ ..:, _@ ;y.. !. I r" ,-r,-_., ',"'; '; ,r,' II i ~ \'" ,...- - , I',~ Â~'/!/ .... ....¡ I h I / " '.. "'\ I 'I· '':''i'.:',:,-~:''',~,,, >; )' , .J.-/,,,,,, I' .-' /. , ' '. ,. / )! / ¡', ,~-",' '. ,.~,' ,'J , .' .~, ,,-,' / ." /. '. ,--_..,' . .~ . --.>.,> ",. -? .'. .. ' _. , . ,- r , 'I' : e- -'''1 ~ . .. ' .. _ '-?:;:~l~ ::.- u "~'::I~' ~- :: ~~~rf';:?' ';'-:;~ ~ f¡/ij-::? )(J II ,\I~~/~'\',Jí~~ ~_.> rr V - · ,,'. I r.""" ." " " ~T'" ,- V . // II; ././ .. '.,... ;-'7-'! "-v.'-I' ",..! .:...,',' ¡.. " <:' I, I II/ ')/1 "'--_'[;;_ ')~ "^. ).L~'., 7\Ç' <'~; ~,p f'Y· /-' I :'1:'/ /I~I {\ \. ........1. (~~~~.. );'·V. -:-' '~~I~);~l\~::~~ ¡ /~,!;(:~\<~: _ ," ,VI!\-, .' I , A ".<" If .7 ,~" " " ~~ '. ._-A-'_ .._.. .......1 ')(1 ,..., "ì-\, ",...1'--- " I ~/'" .......' ~ ' ~\"",,? ~ "('~ ,~I,-' . . . \, I: \, I.t. :~: I""', ,¡.T'Ì--A"j ".-.[ I I'i'ï-j , -kc-"-\' ):'Q"},: j .....,,?;í~\ ,. "(Í~:)::~ _ ,I --r-.<-" ,..., .., ~ .. ,/ r" " , ~ I "... ._ ...... ' /, - - c:-'"' I "I\J~I ¡,.,. '~ '- '. ... Ii I . ... I \ I .1 ' u I I ,... I ,_;::,-,...-4'" I "l?f ' , -r . . I . . ~. . . . . 1_1\ I " i l...., ~~~ \ ' - .. rq.· "I'· ..... J..... II· . . . - r _ ' 0' ,.\<" '\ (-/:' '/'1' -, ' c;> _ ~ ' ~I" 1 ,I" <iT ;;;r · \ 3 I ""~) \;1, '(. \\ ( I ;:, ~ ~ ',' \' 1 ) \ i ",;;.'~ \ ,AI" 'ò'''<: · 'ê6 Il _ \.. I I ~ \......., (;/"!"--::"'~~\: ! l~rf' . '¥ <. \ \ ,,: ~ .-:. '" '~~~ I ~.... "'.-.- _' Æ\ / / ' <,,; ¡~ !i~â '0 We ~: \ð)\ . \ ,,-f~11~ ~r'Í ~ " / I '\ . \ · · .. v', v, )1' , \ 1. ~ I. .:'1?- · '- ' -, " ~ , . ~. ~,¡ I [~ ~\: \ ..~ ' · ~ ~ fl. T ~ I >O'~ - .,.... ,,,,' '\' ' I7T7 \. _ / V ~ '-:' '';;' ïi~ 16d:;tI~' I"~ ,i.':' ''"< ~' . '\ ,:-1 \. I . ~. \ ~!. \ \ ,~¡,,~ \,.:,Vcl~10 · / 1 1 \\, d / Î\' ( h.'\ ~(~,.. \: v ...:;.......- 1 LY --l. '., "'\ ~~-1~1.}i (L\. '... //...\~,~I ~. I W" ;[<1 '\ 'f " \\ \ · ",' \ '\1 ()fj' \ >'X- "\' / \ I / ~___ : )t \'\ \ ) \~' ~i\l ~'~ ~(~"~~~. '. ~ ), / 'v ) I bi.J I: ~ / ~l" / :D 7 :í'(-; ,_ I /~~,,-z. (" 1 " ~/I . n! fvl nz:::1 ',,, I, I / ~'ð0. I . ,\ 1_ .¡'I,,/) ... ~ ¡" /. ~(¡'J~I'~ , "" /I 7' ~ò~ I 11}~,J' l:~ ) / .'j,11 ) : ¡ 1\ \ !( <i: II' 1/ I Y'lIf/~/ A ~ ç-:~1/T(;\1 (~ ' A '<, v- Ix" ': I I (G 'i.~ '!I7(".l .!( \ \ ! . / 1;1" ,I I v~,/ J /1(,../'/1 r ' :JtO ..}. f~ ::' / 'tç I // \~~J~\')¡ ~ \'/"( ( . ________ :: / . -~. i h' \{, 7 I·,,~~·\?;:.t;~~,. '" ~ ~ t--i I \ ,II! \~ . "\.' \ \t1ll1 1/ J....--LJ; :~' ¡<.;: ~ ~~ l \¡~'\~,- III /L _"" nt,"'" ·r1I~ )J~ ~""~' D1 \ ~i(. 7fi . / I . e-rt ~ ~ ì I 1,\ ~11lT7 : _l' t I ~ :I 1:1 II .A .\1 :¡ \ "C~ ;:¿J~~"'::-': ; l,! '\ i!Ji~::· ..... ....."., '- 'Y.....\I I I I I· · : ...±: l' ~-:-- --~.... - ,) :~"';\\I\ ~ ' .., > '. , ~/ 7/ ~ . __ f-a>- I I.S ~~~1 ~. r.. w - : \'.: 7 I ~ f-~- I I '~7''¡~¡ ~ W\ F :~ ~'~~" \ : ( \--::::;::::::!~__ '"", ~~ ~ !:::= I §1 \ \.. \, ~ gII11 ~... -XI"" \ \ \..-1"' w 11 \ ..... " '. ~ ' \" .~, c--' "..' ~1~~Y"'''':''-¡l IrfãJ\TL ,/¡,~' ~\ - , ~ §' \ '" . '\ ì 1 ~ - ~ ~ ,,-.. \ ~'...... ~ ,..-¡;;T "'í \~~ \ 1'--1"1. ~ § '"- ' ª \~ ,~.;"'\I..J\ L/I \..../"~ I [") '\ - ~ \\ -'. (1./ \ ' , ~ i=~ü~ rt---1.'Til ts; \ ~ ~ ~~\<~~ ~:' . \ D ~\- ~ ( ~o I ,"~ ¡(rt'" T I ~ ,,/.1 , ,I ' ,. , ' i \ II .Ii !I \\~ ê ~ ~~ ~ I!!~ g i50 ~ ~g: ~ ó oO! ~ z g:8 ...l z O!!: :I: « ~CII ~ ~ -<!oJ p:: ~~ :I: '" ¡.o ~~ i ~;a; z a ¡¡ ! ! O~ ¡ ~ ! I ~t r ~ 1 >< ....~' ¡- :1 ., ~t ~ i . riD ~ : ~ i; . ! . . . . , THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF TARRANT CONTRACT This Agreement made and entered into this the day of 1996, by and between the County of Tarrant, acting herein by and through its governing body the Commissioners Court, hereinafter referred to as TARRANT COUNTY, and the City of North Richland Hills acting herein by and through its governing body, hereinafter referred to as THE CITY, both of Tarrant County, State of Texas, witnesseth: WHEREAS, this Agreement is made under the authority granted by and pursuant to Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code; and WHEREAS, the party or parties paying for the performance of governmental functions or services shall make payments therefore from current revenues available to the paying party; and, WHEREAS, the governing bodies of the two parties find that the project or undertaking is necessary for the benefit of the public and that each party has the legal authority to build or maintain the project or to provide such service, and the construction and improvement thereof is in the common interest of both parties hereto; and that the division of costs provided for constitutes adequate consideration to each party; set proj ect being more particularly described as: . . , · Construction of North Tarrant Parkway, a county thoroughfare approximately 24 feet in width, from Smithfield Road (in the vicinity of Wilson Lane) West to the existing roadway for a distance of approximately 2900 feet. · The construction is contingent on a donation of a 200 foot wide strip of right-of-way from the CITY to the COUNTY, along the length of the said thoroughfare. WHEREAS, the parties hereto, in order to facilitate the financing and construction of the needed facility, and in order to share the costs of having said work to be done have agreed to share in the financing of said construction as hereinafter stated in detail. The CITY hereby agrees that the CITIES of North Richland Hills and KELLER will pay for all engineering on this project, and that the COUNTY will not be responsible for any payment for such services. The CITY must notify the COUNTY within thirty days of the completion of this project of any complaint the CITY has with the project. For and in consideration of the mutual undertaking hereinafter set forth and for adequate consideration given, the parties agree as follows: 1. TARRANT COUNTY agrees to construct North Tarrant Parkway from Smithfield Road West to the existing roadway of Wilson Lane, as described previously. The work will . . , include: base stabilization and application of a HMAC or penetration surface. 2. TARRANT COUNTY agrees to provide all labor and equipment and materials necessary to accomplish the construction. 3. The COUNTY agrees to install a 7211 pipe parallel to the proposed roadway and in the north right-of-way. 4. The CITY agrees to construct and maintain approaches to the roadway. S. The CITY agrees to provide intersection channelization and all markings, signs and signals. 6. The CITY agrees it will be responsible for traffic control on this project. This responsibility includes all construction signage, barricades and flagmen necessary to control traffic in and around the construction site. 7. The CITY further agrees to continue policing responsibilities related to the roadway. By entering into this Agreement the parties do not create any obligations express or implied other than those set forth herein and this Contract shall not create any rights in parties not signatories hereto. The parties to this Agreement do not intend by this Agreement that any specific third party may obtain a right by virtue of the execution or performance of this Agreement. CITY agrees that the COUNTY is relying on the CITY for notice of when to proceed with this project, but this Agreement does not require the County to do this project with any particular time frame. . . , This Agreement shall terminate automati'cally upon happening of any of the following events: 1. The completion of the improvement provided for herein or; 2. At the end of one (1) year from date herein, unless renewed by both parties in writing. By: Authorized City Official ATTEST: CITY TARRANT COUNTY: ATTEST: COUNTY TOM VANDERGRIFF, County Judge BOB HAMPTON, Commissioner Precinct Three APPROVAL: District Attorney's Office " CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Approve Transfer of Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Subject: Funds to Calloway Branch 21" Parallel Sewer (Lola Drive to Holiday Lane) Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: 8/26/96 PW 96-45 The budget for this project was approved on 5/22/95, PW 95-27 with the funding appropriated from the Unspecified Utility Fund Balance. The Construction Division project is eligible for reimbursement from sewer impact fees in an amount not to exceed $29,208. The project is now complete and the reimbursable monies can be transferred from the impact fee accounts. Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available in the Sewer Impact Fee Funds to transfer the $29,208 to the Calloway Branch 21" Parallel Outfall sewer project (02-92-07-6000). Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve the transfer of $29,208 to the Calloway Branch 21" Parallel Outfall Sewer project. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operati g Budget _ Oth Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director e CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM City Manager Page 1 of o 8" 6", ~'=~,., "6'~_ , ~8'" lO'l 6"" ß': - U , .S· 6"- ·S" S· 6" 6", _-6'~=6'~, ~..t¡·;...~.'~ >--- - 8" 6~ 8" --,. [~ " B _ L 8 " 8r~ ..6 ~, fit 6" ',::I .' ~ 8", 8',/ , '6 .... --'611-~~~'-; .:.,=:",,;:::; g' 6" ¡ , . ~ .. ~ ;:....: 6" " :~ . - -. : ~.:..:..: ~~--==~ã~ 6 __4C~_ _ ___ .___ ...-,.-- 6": 6'~ "ß" ,'6". 6'r b 6" ---0 ._\ '\ ,-. L_ 8", E . _. ,--- .--. . .--0 '- --- .--. -" -"I __f .- ,---- ~ -...~j---~~ .J ' , ... Jt, __6" 6'" 6" 6" ; , , ' , ~ -L '6'~~ ~ = '" '<' ' , , " " 1 ~ - ----- -.. _.- 6" ,I~ ~'---- _ 6" - - 'to ", , _ "1_ '"';¡\ 6 . '. .. -. --. ~ -. ..' '- ,6 6 '. , , - \ f . _ _. IL . - '\.----... =V.--,-' '...,~ 10 ~ :;--;~II-----":::: .___....:-- . , : ~. ..', :"'.. 6" ~2--1 ", (s" ,----.:I--~~- ~ " . . ... ... _J ~ s" ~-- s" 6" ·1 ~ I I l- ¡: I I , I !I , ~ I f - I - , - ø - '1- ....:::E(/)() --00 -I-()...J ...J ...J :J < -WI- . ~coa:(/)g -:JO -I-O...J :J ...J U. < - '1- onl-(/)g -(/)0 --O...J X ...J W < - .u. "'I-oa: -:J < -u.~Q.. ~...J U. -(/) M(/)I-O -W(/)< -O-Q.. XX< WW() < N :i~ (;) -...J :J I-u. < ...J I- :J <(/) :r:W I- ~~ 0< Z:::E :J...J <- I-u. > I- :J <(/)(/) u. ~jW ~~ ...J-I- ...J:J:(/) :J: c:> < 0 0 (/)...J 000 Z -u. 'Z < X Q..<Q.. a:: W -...J- aI O:J:O .() > 'W (/)-a:: < O>...JQ..Q. Wa::~ ~ -<-< a::Q.O ...J:J:W ...J < all-(/) ...J Q. <a:: < 1-0> 0 ,Z a: - 'W < CIOI-Q.Q. u.1- -(/)-< 0- -Q.() Z X (/)< W W(/) I- ...JI- .... <(/) 0 1-0 00 I- 1-1- co -(/) ZO :JO W:J: on Q.I- ~~ W ...J 'W ...a:Q.< c:> -<-- N "'-"'-Q :r: - 'W I- MX"'-< (/) -W-- 0 "'-0 0 c:> W => N "'-0 -< -Z ;:;~ Q. _...J M ... ...J 0< U. 0 0 WW WW I- ...J "'-:::E <- -< "'- Ou. Q.Z ~~N~C~MNO~MOON~_œOøQ~~~~o~_~ œ=~œN~M=O~-~œON-.œO~Nœœ~Q~OM -~~œ~-~~-~N.~~N-Nœ-~NM~_.MN~ -MMOI"IIIPNCO ......CON-COMeo CONN..,.,..,.,,....,... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. c.oCOOOlcoc.oœCO.MONCO~-~CONNœ~œooc.oø~M -N-~--~N~--~MM--~MM-MMN_M~N* MMMM*M M MM M* M" MM M .OOM.œ~NCOMOO"""N~NO"""OONO.O.~""'~ N...COœ............œC'OMc.o~œCOmMc......"CO_..."NCO..,.,CO O......COœ...NNCO...M_COCOOlN COCO c.oœM ......œNN .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... ..........CO--M...OIN........ NNCO ......M--.._...... ...... .. .. .. .. N.... .. - .. o CO on -.... .. N-U")CO .. .. .. .. -\t')-.- .... .. .. .. .. .. on .. N .. M,....,M......NCOU")o-œœ...-m-O...-OMCONO_...CO......N O~c.ococ.ocooœ.........coc.oco,....,,....,O..,.,U")O..,.,...COO_M,....,...C'O ...--...,.,......ON-("')_... MOMMMMMMMMNN~NNONMOM...MONNMNN_N_OMMM...............M .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0000000000000000000000000000 œ-oOOOOOOM~Nœœoo~oœœoœ~MNOMO -~Oooo~OOa_~Q~O.M.~NOCœ~~o~_ Q~OOOOœoo-~~øØO~Q~M.O.~N_O~Q · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ONOOOOOOOOOOOOONOOMOOON__O_O ~~~MM~œœœœ~.~~.~ONNNNOONN~MN M~.~~NNNNNNNNNNN~~~~~œœMM~~ø œ~MC~N~C~~O_ ~MNOO~ØØØN~~~~~~Oø~~ø~~~~....MMMNMONNNNN~ · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~~~~~øøøCC~~~~~~~....MMMMNNN ---------------------------------------- ~~œœœ.~~~~øcøøøø.øø~ø..~~==mm~~~~M.MMMM.O COO>c:>......COMMMonononon~onon-c:>c:>c:>c:>NNCO~CIO~~COCONOc:>....onMMMMonClO NOO~~~~~~-Cøøøø~OøøCC~~~~OOOOOOOO-~____OO · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...MMMMMMMNNNNNNN____OOOOooooooooœ~~~~~G~ --------------------------------- ø~œœœ.~G~œø~c~øø.....MM~~ØØØØØ~~~MNOOOO-- MØ~--.~~~~OOOOOOø~~~~ØCOO--QQQ~MMœ-ø~CCGN .N-OOœ~~~MœQQœœmNCC~~____ø~~~~~~~~øQQOœ~Q · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -----OOOOOQOOOQœœG~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~øØ~~~~~M ---------- oœ~No~o~~.O~~.OO.MMCOØOG~G-GG~~œ~øo-œ.cN- N~œ--øœ-~O~~O-~..Nœ-N.Mø~MO~~N-.œ~.M=NC~M MC~~GNœ-..M...-Ø-~.~-O-~.~Nœ.-.C_.O.M.MM~ · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ø.~~~~~~~~~~~~OM~ØM~ØØM~~~.~.O.N~~~.....N ~~~œN~~.~NM~~~.~O.MMcN-C~œQøN~.~.~O~~~~~~ ~N~~œ~OC~~N~~~-~O_MOMM~~.M.OO~_~Q~.N~-M.~ MC~~øœ~-c~~~~~.~NMNM~~QMN~O~C~~œ-.OMNMNNO · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NMOOOQ-OOOOOOO~NoœNœ~~OœQCœ~œNœœ~ø~c~~ø~~ ----- -------- œ~.~O~~-.~M~N~œ-~o~-œN~œ~o~-œO.~McON~~~~_ -N~~œ-OQMo~-~~--~øON~.~œ~O~œOœNœONœNœ~O~M NMœ-~-O~øOMM~ÐN-O~_N.~~~~Q~~_ MCON~MCO__~ · .... .... ....... ............. . . . .. . . . MO~~-..OØ-~MQOM~_ONO~.ON~MM.O-.MC.-~__G.. NM-CMM-~~N_M~_N--~*M-_N-~-M~_ NMM.M_M_M~_ *~MM*MMM ** MMMMM MM~M* M* * MM MMMMM MM -~~·~·--------~~--~--.~--.c_~ ~~~.._____~ h-NNNN~~~~~~~~~C~~C~~N~~~N-~_ -CNNN~~~~~_ · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MM............MMMMMMMM...NMMNMM...NMM...MMMCOMN.........MMMMMM hCCCCc~~~~~~~~œ~~h~~h~~~~cc~ø Ø~~C~~h~~~C MM*~***MM**M*M**MM*M**~M*MMM* *~M*MMMMM*M ~O~~~~O~O~~~O~~~OOOOO~~~~~O~O -~NMhOœCœCQ.M..N~œ.__hQh_CMCØ M.NOM.-C N_ --NM-C .N_M~__~ ~O\O~t.OW')OOO~O a;).œN""'-MM~_MM MC ~MN""'--~N -C~""'~""'--------~t.O--t.O--.~__.c_~ N-NNNNNNNNNNNNN-NN-NNN-NNN_N_ ~I,()""'·"""-----ca --NNNNNNNN- ~h~~~h~....~................................. .~~........,..~. NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNN œ-NM.I,()~""'-CœoœO.-~NMNM.~Ø~ca~O_N t.OC=œO-NM.~.~ ~ -O-~-C----------NNNNNNNNMMMMMMM OOM M 00 ,-- N NN- NN »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»> ««««««««««««««««««««< ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ð~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~JJJJJJJ~JJJJJJ~ JJJJ~~J JJJJJJJJJJ~J~JJJJJJJJ~JJJJJJJJJJJ JJJJJJJ ««««««««««««««««««««< oooouuuuuuuuuoouuuuuuoooouuou~ouu~uouuuuu , . OCOO ex) "-CO en ~lf>lcn (7)LOM t; ..-"õt 10 t;~ C/) (\,..-..- O. ..-. T'" 'lit ...,. (ij ..¡...:...: ø MI"-- Ò :...:.¡~'fÞ - MM(\' .CX) LO I"-- C'? ~;-,II) 0 OM..- "'t I"-- (\, ~ :'"," ...,. ..- . ;.: ;:, ~ ..- ... "ic., ~ ":" .~, ,,~~ - ~j - «)CO«)(\/ M "õt0 "õt (7) CO ..- M I"--MO (7)0 (7)(7) 0 MO..-I"-- M ..- ..- ..- 0(7) CO «)MO ..- ..- ..- - «) O"õtMM ..- 1"--. I"-- "õt ~": M (\'I"--O ~ "õt"õt (7) «)- Ñ ~ cD (\, LO LO «) ..- ..- ci 1"--(\/0 «) cD cD (7) (7)~LO..- (\/ «) «) LO -«) «) OO~ ~ LO ~ ..- M ..- «) ..- ..- "õt "õt "õt"õt ~ ~ M~~ - - '<t"õt00 (7) MO M «) CO ~LOO «)O «)«) 0 (7)LO«)O 0 «)..- I"-- M LOOLO LO I"--(\,O M MM - ~ LO(7)..-M 0 M. «), (7) 0 ..-."õt.LO ~ LO"õtO 0 00 C) ~~"¡I"--. I"-- LOLO 0 «) (7)(\,..- ..- 1"--(\/0 <0 wcD (7) OM"õtM (\, (\,O M (7) ~~..- ..- OO~ C) (7) (7) ..- CO..- 0 LO ..- «) M M "õt "õt M MM ~ ~ - - ..- CO«)O«) (7) (\'M LO "õt ..-«) ij - «) CO (\/0 ·i·· 0 ""'..-OM (\, MO M (7) CO M ..- CO"-O 0..-(7)(7) - "õt I"--"õtCO..- ..- «) (7). LO LO ~~ CO. ~"õt0 CO(\/LO~ (7) ai "õt- ...: Ñ ,.... CO (7) I"-- OCO CO I"--(\'O 1"--- ~~ C/)C/)«) (7) Mc)«)(\/ ..- 0 ..- LO «) 00"': o 00 _41(7) ..- ~ ..- CO CO (\, (\/ CO COCO =41(7) ~ ~ IlL."- "CÕ&Ô . C:<'II(\, .!!! a. >- .c:E- ..-MI"--CO (7) 0..- ~j w~~1 I"-- M,....O 1"--0 I"--CO - .2-~ ..- 0 ,.... CO (7) ,.... (\, ..-"õt LO 000 0 CO"-O «)..- ,....,.... - 0:::........ ,....,....coo LO ..-. «), I"-- "-."-,0 0 LO'<tO 0> CO ""'1"-- .c:~o M - - - - I"--(\,O «). ...: aiai (7) I"--"õtCOLO <0 (\'LO I"-- ~I "õtM..- ..- t:Q)C/) (7) (7) CO LO ..- ~ (\/(7) ..- I"--C")"õt "õt 00"': M MM OCJ)<'II ..- M ..- «) ..- ..- ..- ..- LO LO ~ ZoðC/) ~ ~I ..... 41 0...0 >-Q)C: -<'II :!:::<'II- o~Æ CO«)MO «) (\/ M ~ ~ °,1 M «)'<to - LO«) ..- ..- 0 "õtM«)..- LO (7)(7) CO (\,(7)(\, (\, 00>0 CO CO ,.... ,.... - (\, «)..-COl"-- M ..- M LO CO_«)...- ..- 1"--(\/0 «)O I"-- I"-- (7) ...: ..¡ ai «)- ..- (7)"õt M I"--..-«) «) I"--(\,O cD"': ~~ (7) «)«)"õt..- 0> C") LO (7) M M M OO~ (7) (7)(7) ..- (\,..- "õt ..- ..- ..- M MM ~ (7)O(\,CO CO 00 0 ~j M«) ~j (7) ~~o coo - CO CO 0 OM«)"õt "õt 0 0 OM M CO"-O "õt "õt'<t - ..- LO~MCO ~ ~ «). "õt.": ..- «)MO ~ ~~ (7) ÑciaiÑ "õt (\, (\, o CO (7) ,....(\,O ..- ..- ..- (7) LO«)"õt..- I"-- ..- ..- I"--M 0 00"': «) CO «) ..- ~ ..- (\, ..- (\, (\, (\,(\, ~I "C 41 ... ... <'II :J ~ en 0 ü: ** C/) C/) lL. ~ ... ... 41 41 41 C/) C/) 41 0 41 41 04141 41 41 0 41 -~ c: lL. lL. 41 :J C/)C/) C/) c: 4141 .c: <'II 41 <'II--E c: ÕÕ c: <'II 41 E E 0 ~CJ) (ijOOo 41 ~ 4141 41 (ij E m<'ll<'110 > .e- "e- o. 0 00 41 ;¿ -41 I C/) a. a. c: 41 >< m 0 o 0 E c: <0 ::::!: 41 C/)EE- 0::: a. a. W .c: .=.=5 0 _.Q C> e-o m « :J ::J--..... ... .......J ... c: ãi co c: o ... ... C/) (ij ... ... (ij C/) ......(ij 0 C/) - Q)~--Q)Q) ..... 0 Q) .- Q) Q) Q) õ Q)Q) Õ <'II Q)Q)- c: 41 <'II a. C> a. iü - cD > >-~... -~ 0 -~o ... 0 co Q)<'IIQ)Q) ..- ..... - Q) 0 - ..J ..... - :t: 0 0 Q) <'IIQ) <'IIQ)"- Q) Ë« <'II __ "C <'II ._ 0::: a:~CJ)ë ~CJ) ~CJ) Z mC>«mc CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Approve Revised City-Developer Agreement concerning Subject: Hightower Drive P~ving P~rtidr~tinn. Agenda Number: Stoney Ridge Addition (Eden Addition, Fourth Filing) 8/26/96 PW 96-46 The developer, Steve and Vicki Weinberg (d.b.a. Montclair Park Inc.) requested the City participate in the cost of the extra width of Hightower Drive pavement in excess of a standard 37- foot street. The City-Developer Agreement responding to this request was approved by Council on 8/12/96, PW 96-42. In addition to the City participating in the cost of the extra width of Hightower Drive, the original agreement indicated that the City would overlay an existing section of Hightower Drive (see "overlay paving" section on exhibit). Because of the condition of the existing pavement, this section will need to be reconstructed. The Revised City-Developer Agreement includes the reconstruction of this section, instead of overlaying the existing pavement. The developer has agreed to participate in the cost of reconstructing the overlay paving section, if the City will allow this entire section of Hightower Drive to be constructed with 8" of asphalt on 8" of subgrade. The estimate of City participation based on Austin Bridge & Road bid prices seems reasonable at $42,081.08. Funding Source: Sufficient funds of $42,100 are available in the Unspecified Street Fund. Recommendation: It is recommended the Council approve the Revised City-Developer Agreement with Steve and Vicki Weinberg concerning Hightower Drive Paving Improvements, authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement, and appropriate a total of $42,100.00 from the Unspecified Street Fund. Finance Review Acct. Number ~~. ~L~," _ _.. ¡{)f.J ¿~ ~\ -' fr.- L ent Head Signature ' "ty Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance DlrectOf Page 1 of CITY-DEVELOPER AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS . COUNTY OF TARRANT .3. 6. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS WHEREAS, Steve and Vicki Weinberg, d.b.a. Montclair Park, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, a municipal corporation operating under a Home Rule Charter, hereinafter referred to as "City" desire to enter into a contract for pavement improvements along a segment of Hightower Drive. In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and for the purpose of providing pavement improvements for Hightower Drive as indicated in the construction plans titled "EDEN ADDITION, FOURTH FILING" the Developer and the City hereto agree: 1. The Developer will pay to the City all necessary processing fees and will furnish all necessary permits, as required from the construction of the above referenced facilities. In addition, the Developer has delivered construction plans, and will deliver all other necessary contract documents prepared by a registered professional engineer, and will also furnish construction surveying, cut sheets and field adjustments. 2. The Developer will enter into a contract with the Contractor who will perform the work and who will be paid by the Developer as specified in the construction contract documents. Monthly pay estimates concerning Hightower Drive shall be subject to the City's review. The Developer agrees to provide, at no cost to the City, all testing necessary to insure that the construction is in accordance with the project specifications and the City standards. 4. The Developer understands and agrees that he has no authority to cancel, alter or amend the terms of the construction contract with reference to Hightower Drive without specific written authority of the City, and that he shall be responsible for paying the costs of any cancellations, additions, alterations, or amendments to the contract unless specifically provided otherwise by written authorization from the City. 5. The Contractor will provide to the City on City forms a maintenance bond in the amount of twenty (20%) percent of the contract price less the City's participation of the costs. It is herein expressly written that the Developer shall require the Contractor to maintain all improvements regardless of the face value of the bond. The City agrees to participate in the cost of the facilities after construction is complete and accepted. The description and amount of participation is as follows: In accordance with Section 345 of Ordinance No. 1982, Subdivision Regulations, and as previously discussed with City Council on 3/25/96, agenda item PS 96-06, the City will reimburse the Developer the eligible amount for street improvements on Hightower Drive. The City shall only reimburse the 'Developer the amount agreed upon below, after the construction of the improvements is complete and accepted by the City. Page 10(4 Eden4.agr (revised 8120196) . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works Department August 12, 1996 Hightower Drive/Stoney Ridge Addition (Eden Addition, Fourth Filing) Summary of Cost <-:.:.:-::.»:::->:.:..,»:-.,':--:::-.<:;.:-:,:.:.:.>;.:.;.;.;.:.;.;.:-:-:.;.:-:-:.;..,>:.:-;.:.:.;-;.;,;-:.;.;-:-:-:.:-:-:-:.:-: . . .... -....'.:.:-:.:.':.'.:.. >:>.:->',.,'.....'...'......,..--;.'.............'...............'.'.................'...... De'lelöþèr.çèistY):: $ 29,549.05 0.00 11,540.23- $ 41,089.28 Stoney Ridge Offsite Overlay Section $ 6,490.20 15,934.82 19,656.06* $ 42,081.08 . *'ncludes original overlay cost of $10,437.16 plus additional cost of $9,218.90. -Developer will pay this amount if allowed to use 8" asphalt on their section of Hightower Drive. , Page 2 of 4 Eden4.agr (revised 8120196) ·7. 9. 10. . , The City will inspect the work as required and upon satisfactory completion of the work, the City will accept ownership and maintenance of the street subject to the terms of the maintenance bond. 8. The Developer further covenants and agrees to, and by these presents does hereby, fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents and employees from all suits, actions, or claims of any character, whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages sustained by any persons (including death), or to any property, resulting from or in connection with the construction, design, performance, or completion or any work to be performed by said Developer, his contractor, subcontractors, officers, agents, or employees, or in consequence of any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of said Developer, his contractor, subcontractors, officer, agents, or employees, whether or not such injuries, death or damages are caused, in whole or in part, by the alleged negligence of the City of North Richland Hills, its officers, agents, servants, employees, contractors, or subcontractors. Upon completion of the work, good and sufficient title to all facilities constructed warranted free of any liens or encumbrances is hereby vested in the City of North Richland Hills. Special provisions: None Page 3 of 4 Eden4,agr (revised 8I2Ot96) . Executed this the day of ,1996. By: Steve Weinberg By: Vicki Weinberg STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the _ day of 1996, by Steve and Vicki Weinberg, d.b.a. Montclair Park, Inc. . Notary Public, State of Texas Commission Expires: Notary's Printed Name: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: Mayor, Tommy Brown ATTEST: City Secretary, Patricia Hutson APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: I Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City Page 4 of4 Eden4.agr (revised 8120.96) . . I ~o~ :t ....... (;\ .:t èJ ê ¡r o c :J '< () ) o o ^ (b U-Jm d.CL :T.13 :) t1 "1iJ - ~ ~~ _. :s P-~ co -< (t) z ~ . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Approve Revised City-Developer Agreement concerning Subject: Hightower Drive Paving Participation. Agenda Number: Stoney Ridge Addition (Eden Addition, Fourth Filing) 8/26/96 PW 96-46 The developer, Steve and Vicki Weinberg (d.b.a. Montclair Park Inc.) requested the City participate in the cost of the extra width of Hightower Drive pavement in excess of a standard 37- foot street. The City-Developer Agreement responding to this request was approved by Council on 8/12/96, PW 96-42. In addition to the City participating in the cost of the extra width of Hightower Drive, the original agreement indicated that the City would overlay an existing section of Hightower Drive (see "overlay paving" section on exhibit). Because of the condition of the existing pavement, this section will need to be reconstructed. The Revised City-Developer Agreement includes the reconstruction of this section, instead of overlaying the existing pavement. The developer has agreed to participate in the cost of reconstructing the overlay paving section, if the City will allow this entire section of Hightower Drive to be constructed with 8" of asphalt on 8" of subgrade. The estimate of City participation based on Austin Bridge & Road bid prices seems reasonable at $42,081.08. Funding Source: Sufficient funds of $42,100 are available in the Unspecified Street Fund. Recommendation: It is recommended the Council approve the Revised City-Developer Agreement with Steve and Vicki Weinberg concerning Hightower Drive Paving Improvements, authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement, and appropriate a total of $42,100.00 from the Unspecified Street Fund. Finance Review Finance Dlreclo, Page 1 of CITY-DEVELOPER AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS . COUNTY OF TARRANT .3. 6. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS WHEREAS, Steve and Vicki Weinberg, d.b.a. Montclair Park, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, a municipal corporation operating under a Home Rule Charter, hereinafter referred to as "City" desire to enter into a contract for pavement improvements along a segment of Hightower Drive. In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and for the purpose of providing pavement improvements for Hightower Drive as indicated in the construction plans titled "EDEN ADDITION, FOURTH FILING" the Developer and the City hereto agree: 1. The Developer will pay to the City all necessary processing fees and will furnish all necessary permits, as required from the construction of the above referenced facilities. In addition, the Developer has delivered construction plans, and will deliver all other necessary contract documents prepared by a registered professional engineer, and will also furnish construction surveying, cut sheets and field adjustments. 2. The Developer will enter into a contract with the Contractor who will perform the work and who will be paid by the Developer as specified in the construction contract documents. Monthly pay estimates concerning Hightower Drive shall be subject to the City's review. The Developer agrees to provide, at no cost to the City, all testing necessary to insure that the construction is in accordance with the project specifications and the City standards. 4. The Developer understands and agrees that he has no authority to cancel, alter or amend the terms of the construction contract with reference to Hightower Drive without specific written authority of the City, and that he shall be responsible for paying the costs of any cancellations, additions, alterations, or amendments to the contract unless specifically provided otherwise by written authorization from the City. 5. The Contractor will provide to the City on City forms a maintenance bond in the amount of twenty (20%) percent of the contract price less the City's participation of the costs. It is herein expressly written that the Developer shall require the Contractor to maintain all improvements regardless of the face value of the bond. The City agrees to participate in the cost of the facilities after construction is complete and accepted. The description and amount of participation is as follows: In accordance with Section 345 of Ordinance No. 1982, Subdivision Regulations, and as previously discussed with City Council on 3/25/96, agenda item PS 96-06, the City will reimburse the Developer the eligible amount for street improvements on Hightower Drive. The City shall only reimburse the 'Developer the amount agreed upon below, after the construction of the improvements is complete and accepted by the City. Page 10'4 Eden4,agr (revised 8120196) , . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works Department August 12, 1996 Hightower Drive/Stoney Ridge Addition (Eden Addition, Fourth Filing) Summary of Cost Stoney Ridge Offsite Overlay Section $ 6,490.20 15,934.82 19,656.06* $ 42,081.08 .--....-...',...,... .' ... '...........'.,...-........---...,......-.-....". ,·······,·'·····'···········'··D~véìöþ~fCÓ1~tU< $ 29,549.05 0.00 11,540.23- $ 41,089.28 . * Includes original overlay cost of $10,437.16 plus additional cost of $9,218.90. -Developer will pay this amount if allowed to use 8" asphalt on their section of Hightower Drive. , Page 2 0'4 Eden4.agr (revised 8120/96) ·7. 8. 9. 10. . , The City will inspect the work as required and upon satisfactory completion of the work, the City will accept ownership and maintenance of the street subject to the terms of the maintenance bond. The Developer further covenants and agrees to, and by these presents does hereby, fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents and employees from all suits, actions, or claims of any character, whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages sustained by any persons (including death), or to any property, resulting from or in connection with the construction, design, performance, or completion or any work to be performed by said Developer, his contractor, subcontractors, officers, agents, or employees, or in consequence of any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of said Developer, his contractor, subcontractors, officer, agents, or employees, whether or not such injuries, death or damages are caused, in whole or in part, by the alleged negligence of the City of North Richland Hills, its officers, agents, servants, employees, contractors, or subcontractors. Upon completion of the work, good and sufficient title to all facilities constructed warranted free of any liens or encumbrances is hereby vested in the City of North Richland Hills. Special provisions: None Page 3 of 4 Eden4.agr (revised 8/20196) . Executed this the day of ,1996. By: Steve Weinberg By: Vicki Weinberg STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the _ day of 1996, by Steve and Vicki Weinberg, d.b.a. Montclair Park, Inc. . Notary Public, State of Texas Commission Expires: Notary's Printed Name: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: ATTEST: Mayor, Tommy Brown City Secretary, Patricia Hutson APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 'Rex McEntire, Attomey for the City Page 4 of 4 Eden4,agr (revised 8/2G96) . ~o~ :t:: ...... C\ .:t èJ ~ fl , o c .... .-J '< () "' 0' o A (b UJfT1 ;to-. :T.J3 t1 Ì\) - ~ . ~~ _. :s P-~ Co -< (t\ Z~ -, ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Approve Final Pay Estimate NO.3 in the amount of Subject: $39,12420 to Sharror.k Fler.trir.. lor. for Tr;:¡ffir. Agenda Number: Signalization on Mid-Cities Boulevard @ Holiday Lane 8/26/96 PAY 96-07 This CIP project was awarded by Council on 2/26/96, PU 96-19, for $56,557.00 to Sharrock Electric, Inc. The total contract amount after change orders is $59,927.00. Final payment will make the contractor's total earnings on the project $59,830.40, which is $96.60 under the contract amount. The contractor substantially completed this project on July 22, 1996, prior to the contract completion date of July 31, 1996. The project is now totally complete with all final adjustments having been made. Funding Source: Sufficient funds of $85,000 were previously appropriated by Council action on 2/12/96, GN 96-23. l.. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve final payment to Sharrock Electric, Inc. in the amount of $39,124.20. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ o r Acct. Number 02-24-03-6000 Sufficient Funds Available Fln""ce DlreC10r Page 1 of SHARROCK ELECTRIC, INC. ELECTRJCAI. CONTRACTORS P.O. BOX 8360 FT. WORTH, TX. 76124-8360 817-429-8502 Fax 817-429-8559 ~~ì~\lf\\m1~dCTQ 11~ \:1'WJJ d..~ iNVOICE'5035 DATE: JULY,1996 To: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS P.O. BOX 820609 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,TX. 76182 Ship To: JOB NO. PROJECT NO. LOCATION 96-546 WATAUGA RD. ~ HOLIDAY LN. ATTN: JIMMY CATES .--. ".- _.- DELIVERY INSTR. JOB' ESTIMATE ø SALESPERSON P.O. NUMBER CONTRACT AMENDED ge-546 FINAL -- . -. ~ . DESCRIPTION WORK PERFORMED THIS MONTH UNIT PRICE AMOUNT $37,996.00 (SEE ATTACHED BREAKDOWN) PLUS 5% RETAINAGE FROM INV.' 5012 $532.20 PLUS 5% RETAINAGE FROM INV. ## 5030 $596.00 SUBTOTAL $39,124.20 SALES TAX SHIPPING & HANDLING TOTAL DUE $39,124.20 Make an checks payable to:SHARROCK ELECTRIC. INC. (fyou have anyqueSlions concerning this invoice, call: BERTHA LLEWELLYN 817-429-8502 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER I