Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC 1996-09-09 Agendas
CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 - 6:30 P.M. . For the'Meeting co':""lucted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Pre-Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. '- NUMBER , 1. i; 2. IR 96-89 , 3. I~; 96-92,. 4. PS ~96-25 ,i . -, , 5. PS<9ä·29~ " " , " . ,,:=.·C',~ ':._ '-S.GN 9ß-110 , . r'i' " I .. 7;'GN 96-115 I,; , : . . , ..' I J : ITEM ACTION TAKEN .-. ì ':Di~cussion of Economic Development Funds (5 ¡Minutes) i .. .. ., .'- '." .. ;,:; "i'q,Qlurt Security Fund (10 Minutes) .. ..: ,:Teakwood Court Drainage Improvements, P~ase II; Status Report (10 Minutes) . "::"7"",· ~¿ Request of Lincoln Property Company for Replat oi Lot 7R 1, Block 4, North Richland Hills Addition (Located at the Southwest Corner of ,<:3ir~By¥ine Highway and Blaney Avenue) í~1g~ndaltem No.9) (5 Minutes) ,', ' -,-" . 7' }~i'~~- I Re^q~est of Kingsgate Corporation for Replat of .- Lòf,2R, Block 2, Culp Addition (Located at the N"ortheast Corner of Davis Boulevard and Northeast Parkway) (Agenda Item No. 11) (5 ~inµtes) i ..-:- 'i',c·;;·::-.:;:....::;- '''' "'?,"' .., 1 cl:tè~U'~iSt for Extension of Permit for Use- of , ßr~~q'Valley Race Track (Agenda Item No. 12) " (SMiriutes) . , , , ' '-, ~::.,:_. "',- .;:"'-:.'. " , [ ,EÌ"ijpJoye,e Compensation System Policies and "Prðqequres - Resolution No. 96-59 (Agenda Item No.' 17) (5 Minutes) -- . . e Page 2 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 8. GN 96-117 Appointments to the Local History Steering Committee (Agenda Item No. 19) (5 Minutes) 9. Other Items 110 I Adjournment -7:20 p.m. I *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. POST~ q / to q~ I Da(~ I ',L\S -~M^ Tim &J ~Æ"rff~~ " . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA September 9, 1996 For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1 . Items marked with an * are on the consent agenda and will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 581-5502 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Minutes of the Pre-Council Meeting August 26, 1996 5. Minutes of the Regular Meeting August 26, 1996 . i Page 2 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 6. Presentations by Boards & Commissions a. Beautification Commission Minutes b. Teen Court Advisory Board Minutes 7. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 8. Consent Agenda Item(s) Indicated by Asterisk (9,10,11,12,14,17, 18,20,21 & 22) *9. PS 96-25 Request of Lincoln Property Company for Replat of Lot 7R 1, Block 4, North Richland Hills Addition (Located at the Southwest Corner of Grapevine Highway and Blaney Avenue) *10. PS 96-27 Request of Crown Oaks Inc. for Replat of Lots 7R, 8R and 9R, Block 3, Woodland Oaks Addition (Located at the Southwest Corner of Rolling Hills Drive and South Crest Drive) *11. PS 96-29 Request of Kingsgate Corporation for Replat of Lot 2R, Block 2, Culp Addition (Located at the Northeast Corner of Davis Boulevard and Northeast Parkway) e e ~ 4 Page 3 ... . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *12. GN 96-110 Request for Extension of Permit for Use of Green Valley Race Track 13. GN 96-111 Approval of 1996 Certified Tax Roll - Resolution No. 96-58 *14. GN 96-112 Authorizing Homestead, Over 65, and Disability Exemptions from Ad Valorem Taxes - Ordinance No. 2139 15. GN 96-113 Adopting the Tax Rate for 1996 - Ordinance No. 2140 16. GN 96-114 Adoptiong the 1996-97 Budget - Ordinance No. 2141 *17. GN 96-115 Employee Compensation System Policies and Procedures - Resolution No. 96-59 *18. GN 96-116 Emissions Analyzer Upgrade 19. GN 96-117 Appointments to the Local History Steering Committee *20. PU 96-65 Authorize Purchase of Treadmill e e ~ ¡, Page 4 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *21. PU 96-66 Award Bid for Motorcycles *22. PW 96-47 Approve City-Developer Agreement Concerning Hightower Drive Paving Participation, Stonybrooke Addition 23. Citizens Presentation I 24. Adjournment I I e e POSTE~ 9/~/1~ /Da~ I'· LiS (.Vrn- Time tl.Æ! City Secre~ By c~M lJ~~ INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. lR 9~9 * Date: September 9, 1996 Subject: Court Security Fund Legislation passed during the 1995 legislative session allows a municipality to establish a security fund for Municipal Courts. This fee has been established in County Courts for several years, but security concerns for Municipal Courts are now being addressed. A $3.00 fee can be added to each case convicted in a trial. These funds must be dedicated for security measures within the court. The legislation defines authorized security measures. To collect the additional fee, a municipality must pass an ordinance authorizing collection of this fee. North Richland Hills was the only court at a recent court training seminar of over 100 courts that had not enacted a security fee ordinance. The additional fines could generate up to $45,000 annually. This fund could save general fund expenditures that will be needed to provide additional security in the court, whether or not this ordinance is established. Several security improvements could be implemented as soon as funds are available. We are requesting direction on implementing this fee. Judge R. Oujeskey and I will be available at Pre-Council to answer questions. ~m R J/2lÞ, James R. Wilkins CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS . ~\\.~ ~ . e A\J1J 1~ Iff 5 203, Local Government Code. No expenditures may be made from this fund without prior approval of the commissioners court. SECTION 2. Article 102.017, Code of Criminal Procedure, as added by Section 1, Chapter 818, Acts of the 73rd Legislature, 1993, is amended to read as follows: Art. 102.017. COURT COSTS; COURTIlOUSE SECURITY FUND; MUNICIPAL COURT BUILDING SECURITY FUND. (a) A defendant convicted in a trial for a felony offense in a district court shall pay a $5 security fee as a cost of court. (b) A defendant convicted in a trial for a misdemeanor offense in a county court, county court at law, or a district court shall pay a $3 security fee as a cost of court. ~ ¡ovemin¡ body of a municipality by ordinance may create a municipal court buildin¡ security fund and may reqµire a defendant convicted in a trial for a misdemeanor offense in a municipal court to pay a $3 security fee as a cost of court. (c) In this article. a person is considered convicted if. (1) a sentence is imposed on the person: () the person receives community supervision. includin¡ deferred aqjudication: QI (3) the court defers final di~sition of the person's case. úU The clerks of the respective courts shall collect the costs and pay them to the county or municipal treasurer, as appI'Qpriate or to any other official who discharges the duties commonly delegated to the county or municipal treasurer, as ap.prQpriate. for deposit in a fund to be known as the courthouse security fund or a fund to be known as the municipal court buildin¡ security fund. as apprQpriate. A~] fund desi¡:nated by this subsection may be used only to finance the following items when used for the purpose of providing security services for buildings housing a district. [ef] county.m: municipal court.. as çprQpriate: (1) the purchase or repair of X-ray machines and conveying systems; (2) handheld metal detectors; (3) walkthrough metal detectors; (4) identification cards and systems; (5) electronic locking and surveillance equipment; (6) bailiffs, deputy sheriffs, deputy constables, or contract secÙìity personnel during times when they are providing appropriate security services; (7) signage; (8) confiscated weapon inventory and tracking systems; or (9) locks, chains, or other security hardware. !el [~] The courthouse security fund shall be administered by or under the direction of the commissioners court. The municipal coInt buildin¡ fund shan be administered by or under the direction of the ¡ovemin¡ body of the municipality. SECTION 3. Section 118.052, Local Government Code, as amended by Chapters 554 and 675, Acts of the 73rd Legislature, 1993, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 118.052. FEE SCHEDULE. Each clerk of a county court shall collect the following fees for services rendered to any person: (1) CIVIL COURT ACTIONS (A) Filing of Original Action (Sec. 118.053): (i) Garnishment after judgment $15.00 (ü) All others $40.00 (B) Filing of Action Other than Original Legislative Update '95 Appendix - p. 294 . . . INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. _ IR 96-92 _ ~'i\ , I \1 I Date: September 9, 1996 Subject: Teakwood Court Drainage Improvements, Phase II; Status Report The design for this project is now complete. Staff has been meeting with the affected property owners for the last two months. Some of the property owners have now indicated that they do not wish to dedicate the required easement needed from their property. Attachment "A" indicates the status of the easement acquisitions as of September 4, 1996. Staff will continue to meet with property owners and present any changes with colored exhibits at the Pre Council Meeting. Respectfully, [d.! ISSUED BYTHE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS ~ ~ 8 § o - v; !:2 1iI ... ~ ~ ~ " t>I ~ ¡- i5 '" I- ::II '" i5 t>i "" 15 z ~ :;¡¡ f: '" 0 w :;¡ ~ I- ~ ¡:;: z f: :::> "" w z :II ::J ~ :;¡¡ ~ ¡:;: '" :::> '" '" <:> z 'b f: ~ ¡;¡ '" '" ::J 13 ~ ¡:;: => '" '" ¡;j z "" \ ;- W Wif! ,g:~ q if!t;! v: a.. - < w z :::i ~ > w oeD ¡;,: , ã5 w iO N <õ if! , t;!~3 < ;-I-if! (/)0< W-'-' 8,..:g o~o 3!: ,0 ~:J~ _00..., ¡¡:¡ '" ~I- ",,15 U ~¡: ¡f¡;! ",=> "'0 ~H~ I- W Wif! g:~ ci V) t;!.,¡- ~ a.. ° W ~~~ :::i :J Or!. '" W ~ o !D ~<õ íij w:;'" It) < ('oJ I ¡c; I- i5 ::!! ~ ¡: ::J ¡:;: => in '" z ¡;¡ B I, I' " in " '" I ! " B , I W(/) I J: [JJZ < Z I f3 ¡::::5~~ 0- 0:: ~(I) 0 E l- I ffi « .~ 00 , >d ¡¡:: I ~-' II « ::¡¡::Jf§:iJ 1---' I I f3 xg3!:1õ~:i , " ~ F.,¡-~"';;¡!æ I , W~ 0 l- I "'L... , i I I , >- ~ -¡- ~i5 ~~ ~! I- Z W ~, "'I 51 '" => Wif! Z« z:5~~ « (I) 0 ii :5:i~ 0 w..,F I .,¡- Z ::>æi . wgi1õg: Ii F'" Ef§ I'-L... i¡lh h III G= r!r£: ~ © ~ rQJ © © ~ ~ ~ © r!r£: @ ~1M"'1 A "'(JJ~l@iHJ THEODORE ROOSfVEL T NEHRING, ..R 7429 HIGHTOWER DR. VOL 6234, PG. 276 TR. <l-H2 KERRY C. BENOIT 7925 HIGHTOWER DR. Tft 4H o « :>-0<1) 1.0 :::!Q::~ II:) ~Õt;!~ci w Z .co <:L ro;::¡¡::7..;, <g9<i~g: tn ~-(D W <D :::t::Jt-f'o....J <_.f5 !$ '''L... ;; <D æ w 5 --'~ æ 00 ,-, <Coo- ,-,~N ~N -' , . w-''-' ~!$a. ü :i Z UJ if! ..., 02:< w tñ:5X_'" 2: t;!Oci ð ~ .~ a.~ 'dF1..; 1:Jðf§~~~ -1 oJ::w 1:0 <I: ;-1'-. I- 0t!: ~ ...):::0 :> <l:1'-L... I I I I I I ~~ ~ , ð:5~-'" I~ üVlJ2ci",:::> -1 :5 ï: N a.w ("! ..,F I .. - '" ~ði~~ 'I~ 80 ;- ~ It)g: II;¡ ¡;':~!5 ~ ,13 "'L... , I I , /: >- 8 ° ::¡¡ >-' ..., ~ 3~ Z if! ;:5 :5 ~~ ~ gr-:~ 0°0> . Z 0N~ < 00- ~ ~d ;;;¡; :> [D d F I- d ~<I> <0 - 0:< . - ::!! ox It) < w'" u.. œ;l-o(j Z ~~~a.~ ;;¡ f2 I \Ò ::> J:f§0..., . if! o;;¡:~o>g: <1! rl-;e'" ;- It) 0<: -' f5 ~¡¡: §? ro'" o '" >- ~. qW <I-tn œ;",< CD ::>X Ë8t;! W CD <1! if! !- W 0<: ¡£øP <t( -..... J:CO Ü ~1M"'1 ~"'IJÐIfj]©(J l- I:::! .. \'¡N òi J!! ....ffi Œ:::I o5~O zO < Œ: ...J Sa.. Q 0::1 cr ~w ~ ~C) ~~~ z -< I.i.. Œ: o 0 ç õ ti!I '1:1_ "'0 iii! It) IiIi '" Q>¡-.."- IiIi <:: - ,_.. I It; "I)~ ... " ... _..00 ~ _¡-(oj ., .. 31:,,- .-(oj -"..... <::>... <::>- (oj (oj c .. .. ... " .... .. "- (1)"00 .."I .. <>¡-<o " ..-¡ ., ...-¡ ....a:: 0-'"' - ..." .... 0- 31:00 00 ..... r!r£: [!:!!J] ~ © G= d!: Ii5 = d!: z o ûI :> .... œ \ I I }, I I I \At :;;l0 ON '" SlO ~- fjO ,,--- '" /" " "~---------- ......... o N -----n:- et: o U (f) W·I- :::!; 9~ o ;-:W I <./L.,) Z XF Ü w::> if) W o Q©©MIM©JlJl©~~ '" ...... a.: et: 0 u I (f) w I :::!; 0 I \ z ü CJ if) 0:: W 01- :::i! 0 ~~ ::;¡; 0 ;-:..J I- (f)F -::> (f) X I ::::¡ wòI¡ u I z 0 (f) -1 ,~ --, .....i ~x -.. - .. II I -, ~I-}¡ ! I I: \i I ' , I I: Ii ~ ! ¡- - -r,,-' .. ..., ð I 1 0< 02 02 :¡¡;;< ~N <:(::::¡ ~(f) ~ r---- " \' , , ' '..._i CI) - "'- ~1IiI "'0 ;:::; (!¡ 0 10 Ullll ",,'0 ~ 0:..",1'>. ~IIII <:: - ~ ,_.. t..., ~ "Q I ~ '"~"'t' ~.... _ 10 ~ ..:'<'-4 ., '" _ "~"'t- l1li ~ g::- ! I I ; I I I : II I ! i~1"- I I I \ :: ~ II~ \ I ~ I II ©> I I I ó'I:. I ¡ j '\::::V \ I I I I @ t Ii©> I II©> I: ~(! II~' IC) è.:. II ¡OJ ~! ~ .¡!!JY!t"1 I~ I}= \ f I ! I I : ! ~I·t--- II ._<'-4 -",- 01.. 0- ... ( "'-.>." ,", ,"- ',~ ,- ,,'œ~~:,:; od-·'''.'''''''· a2 " o if) ", £4 <: ' ::;¡;z ::::¡o , , -1::;¡; '...,...... a.... '- "~~' , , 0 ~ '" ',:::$j~ , ~~x", ~\..,........ ~..., ',,~/ :j~ :<- <'-4 Z... ..0 ~ ..: "'","') ,.¡¡ ... "- þ ...,'" VI 0", III!! <II '" I ... <>" 'ó ... ,,"'''') ~ ., ."') I.-&:: \) Q--'" -I..I'>. 1<.0- ~ !l)!il:íIO '- --..." , ' , ' "" ", - ~ ~ I I I ; ¡ j \ 111 I ,I --I- I! I I I il, I I I j I , II' I' I! ! : I ' JF ! \ I ; I 'b ii' I I II' i I I I~~~;- I Ii ! I ì! I III Ii! ! : \) \ 1 I.~' I, ' ¡ I "\ \ B ¡ ì \ Cß' ¡ \ \ ¡ -; , I II \ \ : &\\ \'\~ : ! ~ \ \ I dJ I \ \ \ 1\ 1_____.. ,-" )7 -,-- _\ I , \ ~~' , __.",_L___.:v I " -'II --- , ','" - -.;--, - - '. \ I \ ~~ u",- J \ '\_- ~---------------../ / _____ ---e;; 1> ~ '-, / o©© ~1IîJ'îl~ \ \ ( I \ \ \ ", r- ~\\\\ ' / ~\,," . \ '-', ',' .' \ \ ' \ \\ \--- -" I~ _ ~' _ -: !:""-,"'_I;,'''' ~~ \\\ \ --- -~~--~ I' \' ~,~7~-- /~~'/'-~!" ,/~/ ~ ,"/-- ~ \ ~@%.\~ ~ ~ ~, ' " \\ \~ \ ) ---. \ ,-, \ , " I ¡ i I í ' I I I I I I ! III Ie lllll~ I I í ¡ ¡ ~.. "- ........ "-. -- - ,,~ -_....:.~~ \.~~~ ~ / /./' . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works Department TEAKWOOD COURT DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II Status: Easement Acquisitions September 4, 1996 No Does not want sanitary sewer manhole closer to house. 3. Smith, Robert 7509 Teakwood Crt. No Will not dedicate easement cutting across pool. Will dedicate less than 15', 8utler, Ed 7501 Teakwood Crt. Estrada, Roy 7216 Teakwood Crt. Yes Pool needs protection. Will need to replace storage . building and retaining wall. Sinclair, T eny 7220 Plumwood Yes Only need temporary easement. 7. Bennett, James 7216 Plumwood Yes Wants to review soils report. Only need temporary easement. 8. Sperling, David 7212 Plumwood Yes Only need temporary easement. 81SD Douglas cument signed 7/25/96, 10. 8ellomy, James 6912 Little Ranch Rd. No Too much to dedicate - 2.72 acres. Currently being appraised. 11. Famigletti, Robert 7905 Hightower Will Wants a sewer tap for Consider easement. Easement is 8,529 sJ. 12. Bailey, Ty 7008 Douglas Will Easement is 3,976 s.1. Consider . ~ 1 14 13 TRAQ TR.4H TR.4H2 2.8 ,4.(;, TR,4 5.5,4.(;, 2.6 ,4.(;, 1.4 ,4.(;, 7 TRAE ß'-LLOM'( 2.8 At::. 6 5 TR.462 " I :5 (," TR 48M I ;3.6 At::. TRA87 TRA8 7AI 7~ 2.63 At::. 1.45 At::. 2 ,,' ~(t 1 I ~, I~. I if! 489 Z 2 At::. 2,41 !. ìOO€'> 3 >- Dou~lQ,<;' TR 489 TR 487 if! 487A -< 7~ 2.0 AC 2.6 AC 1.40 AC e¡ i i ::J 0 ::I: 5 2 J .4 if 1905 ~ 4818 ." f" 7~ ____---DR.--- 82A TR 16 1fiRI :2 15 2 82 9.544 AC 53 ;>' 14 J I e¡ ¡ p:: " I§ I.} I~ EAt(. wooD iJ 5 12 5 .) . Present: . Absent: ITEM CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RECOMMEND- A TION TO AMEND CIVIL SERVICE RULE 11,01 (TABLED AT THE JULY 8,1996 MEETING) e MINUTES OF THE PRE COUNCil MEETING OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS HELD IN THE PRE-COUNCil ROOM AT CITY HAll, 7301 NORTHEAST lOOP 820 - AUGUST 26, 1996.. 6:30 P.M. Tommy Brown Lyle E. Welch Mack Garvin Mark Wood Jo Ann Johnson Don Phifer Byron Sibbet C.A. Sanford Randy Shiflet Larry Cunningham Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Greg Dickens Barry LeBaron Terry Kinzie Thomas Powelf Pam Burney Jerry McGlasson Jackie Theriot Richard Albin Mayor Councilman Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney Public Works Director Planningllnspection Director Information Services Director Management Services Director Environmental Services Director Police Chief Acting Finance Director City Engineer Linda Spurlock Sansoucie Councilwoman Mr. Sanford advised Council tabled this at their July 8 meeting and referred the matter to the City Manager for further study and a recommendation. Mr. Sanford advised his recommendation was for written reprimands to be appealable to the City Manager. Mr. Sanford advised he had met with Civil Service Commissioners Dennis York and Sally Hackfeld, and his recommendation was satisfactory to them. Formal action taken at RON MCKINNEY -" . . Pre-Council Minutes August 26, 1996 Page 2 ITEM DISCUSSION APPROVE The City Manager stated that this matter had NAN REVISED CITY- been discussed at a previous Council meeting. DEVELOPER There were no questions from the Council. AGREEMENT CONCERNING HIGHTOWER DRIVE PAVING PARTICIPATION, STONEY RIDGE ADDITION (EDEN ADDITION, FOURTH FILING SET DATE FOR Council consensus was to set the date for the RECEPTION FOR City Hall Reception for October 19. 1996. CITY HALL OTHER ITEMS Councilwoman Johnson stated she felt there NAN needed to be some rules and laws enacted for bicycle riders. Councilwoman Johnson was instructed by the Council to research the matter. Agenda Item No. 14 - GN 96-100- NAN Councilwoman Johnson questioned the funding of the project. Ms, Burney explained nds. ADJOURNMENT Council adjourned to Executive Session. ATTEST: Tommy Brown - Mayor e Patricia Hutson - City Secretary · e e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF N HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 .. AUGUST 26, 1996.. 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order August 26,1996 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Mack Garvin Lyle E. Welch Mark Wood JoAnn Johnson Don Phifer Byron Sibbet Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Staff: C.A. Sanford Randy Shiflet Larry Cunningham Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Greg Dickens City Assistant Manager Ass.istant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer Absent Linda Spurlock Sansoucie Councilwoman 2. I NVOCA TION Mayor Pro Tem Garvin gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 12, 1996 APPROVEQ Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Garvin, to approve the minutes of the August 12, 1996 meeting. e e e City Council Minutes August 26, 1996 Page 2 Motion carried 6-0. Mayor Brown recognized Mr. Mike Gerber and Mr. Matt Shimkus, representatives from Senator Gramm's office, They read a letter from the Senator on the opening of the new City Hall, and presented Mayor Brown with a United States flag flown over the United States Capitol in honor of the citizens of North Richland Hills, 6. PRESENT A TIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. PARK AND RECREATION BOARD MINUTES No action necessary. 6. PRESENTATION OF "YARD OF THE MONTH" AWARDS Mayor Brown and Ms. Patsy Tucker, Beautification Committee member, presented the "Yard of the Month" awards for August to: Alan and Julie Graviett, 8618 Caddo Court; Larry Harper, 3841 Diamond Loch West; Oris and Ann Baldwin, 4624 Mackey Drive Nort 5024 Lakeview Circle; Carroll G. and Jenna Matthews. 7721 Te Mary Hightower, 4904 Nevada Trail; Robert and Nancy Berman, 6844 Richfield; Tony and Kathy Alcini, 8324 Southgate; Russ and Tracie Simon, 6753 Inwood. 7. PRESENTATION OF "LANDSCAPE OF THE MONTH" AWARD The "Landscape of the Month" award for August went to the Orange Valley Homeowners' Association, 7500 Orange Valley. 8. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA None, 9. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (10, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22,23,24,26,26,27 & 28) APPROVED e e e City Council Minutes August 26, 1996 Page 3 Mayor Pro Tem Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Welch. to approve the Consent Agenda, Motion carried 6-0. *10. PS 96-19 - REQUEST OF CURTIS YOUNG FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS1~,BLOCK1, AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CUMMINGS DRIVE AND LOLA DRIVE} APf'ROVeD 11. GN 96-81 .. CIVIL SERVICE ON RECOMMENDATION TO AMEND 11.01 (TABLED AT THE JULY 8,1996 MEETING) Mr. Sanford advised that Council tabled this item at the July 8. 1996 meeting and referred the matter to the City a recommendation. Mr. Sanford advised his recomm was for written reprimands to be appealable to the City Manager. Mr. Andy Wallace, representing the Police Association. appeared before the Council. Mr. the Civil Service Commission·s original recommendation sent to the Council on July 8,1996. Mayor Pro Tem Garvin moved. seconded bý Councilman Phifer, to approve GN 96-81. Motion carried 6-0. *12. GN 96-98 - DRAINAGE SYSTEM - RA TIFICA TION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1727 APPROVED 13. GN 96-99 - APPOINTMENT TO ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet. to appoint Mr. Don Sharp to Place 3 on the Animal Control Shelter Advisory Committee, City Council Minutes August 26. 1996 Pege 4 e Motion carried 6-0. GN 98-100 - Y *14. PARTNERSHIP AJOR 15. GN 98..101 ... PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED TAX RATE FOR 1998/97 FISCAL YEAR Assistant City Manager Cunningham explained the proposed tax rate for the 1996/97 fiscal year. Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. Mr. John Gibbs, 5728 Bermuda Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Gibbs requested Council to consider reducing the tax rate. e Mayor Brown called for anyone else wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to direct staff to place an ordinance on the September 9, 1996 City Council agenda to adopt a tax rate of 57¢ for fiscal year 1996/97. Motion carried 6-0. 16. GN 96...102 ... PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED 1998197 BUDGET APPROVED Assistant City Manager Cunningham presented the proposed budget for fiscal year 1996/97. Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. e e e e City Council Minutes August 26. 1996 Page 5 Councilman Sibbet moved. seconded by Councilman Phifer, to direct staff to place an ordinance to adopt the budget for fiscal year 1996/97 and all rate increases on the September 9, 1996 City Council Agenda. *17. GN 96·103 .. APPROVE CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM .. ORDINANCE NO. 2138 APPROVED *18. GN 96..105.. SUPPORTING THE REAUTHORIZATION OF THE INTERMODAL TA TION EFFICIENCY ACT .. 96-67 APPROVEQ *19. GN 96..108 .. SUPPORTING H.R. 842 TRUTH IN ACT.. RESOLUTION NO. 96..64 APPROVEa *20. GN 96..107 .. SUPPORTING THE REMOVAL OF THE SUNSET PROVISION OF THE CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION ACT .. RESOLUTION NO. 96-65 APPROveD *21. GN 96..108 .. SUPPORTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN RESOLUTION NO. 96-66 APPROVED *22. GN 96..109 .. CONTRACT AUTHORIZING NETS FUNDING *23. PU 96-63 .. AWARD BID FOR COMPUTER EDITING SYSTEM APPROVED e e e City Councii Minutes August 26, 1996 Page 6 *24. PU 96-64 .. AWARD BID FOR STREET RECONSTRUCTION APPROVED *25. PW 96-44 .. APPROVE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH TARRANT COUNTY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NORTH TARRANT PARKWAY APPROVEQ *26. PW 96-45 .. APPROVE TRANSFER OF SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE FUNDS TO CALLOWAY BRANCH 21" PARALLEL SewER (LOLA DRIVE TO HOLIDAY LANE) APPROVEQ *21. PW 96-46 .. APPROVE REVISED CITY·DEVELOPER AGREEMENT PARTICIPATION, STONEY RIDGE ADDITION (EDEN ADDITION, FOURTH FILING) APPROVeg *28. PAY 96-01. APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 3tN THE AMOUNT OF $39,124.20 TO SHARROCK ELECTRIC, INC. FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION ON MID-CITIES BOULEVARD AT HOLIDAY LANE APPROVEQ 29. CITIZENS PRESENTATION None. Mayor Brown announced a Reception will be held at City Hall on October 19,1996 for the citizens to view the new City Offices. 30. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting. . . . MINUTES OF THE BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE PARKS AND RECREATION CONFERENCE ROOM, 6720 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 JULY 16, 1996 ATTENDANCE Present: Deloris Pultz Emily Ward Jeanne Lueck Patsy Tucker Jane Dunkelberg Glenn Nerwin Chairperson . Vice Chairperson Commission Member Commission Member Commission Member Alternate Commission Member STAFF Tim Hightshoe Sandra Miller Parks Superintendent Secretary Absent: Billie Sommermeyer Phyllis Creecy Commission Member Commission Member 1. CALL TO ORDER Ms. Pultz called the meeting to order July 16, 1996 at 7:08 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Mrs. Lueck made a motion, seconded by Ms. Ward to approve the minutes of the May 21, 1996 Beautification Commission meeting. Motion carried 6-0. 3. DISCUSS KEYNOTE SPEAKER/SEMINAR Ms. Dunkelberg briefed the Commission on the Andy and Sally Waskowski presentation at Dan Echols Senior Center on September 5, 1996. She presented a package from the speakers containing press releases with photographs, press reviews and confirmation of the fee to be paid. The package was passed to Sandra Miller to process. Ms. Dunkelberg presented a flyer for the event and requested for 500 copies be made for distribution. Discussion was held to place the flyer in numerous locations throughout the City, Homeowners Associations, nurseries, garden clubs and Master Gardeners. Requests were made for Citicable to be present to video tape in addition to distribution of press releases and flyers. - Randy Weston of Weston Gardens is to be present selling plants and books which the speakers will autograph. . Ms. Tucker is in charge of refreshments and each Commission Member will assist. Plans are being made for approximately 250 in attendance. 4. DISCUSS APPRECIATION PARTY FOR YARD OF THE MONTH AND LANDSCAPE WINNERS , Ms. Tucker presented a handout which suggested a "Lawn Party" to recognize winners for the Yard of the Month and Landscape award winners. Ms. Tucker made a motion to host a party for the award recipients. The motion was seconded by Ms. Dunkelberg and Ms. Lueck. The locations discussed were Green Valley Community Park and Soccer Complex or NRH20. Ms. Pultz suggested this item to be discussed and fine tuned in the next workshop. 5. ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON Ms. Pultz stated that elections of officers was to be conducted at the meeting. Nominations for Chairperson was opened. . Ms. Ward nominated Ms. Pultz for Chairperson. The floor was closed with no other nominations. Motion carried 5 - O. Ms. Tucker nominated Ms. Ward for Vice Chairperson. The floor was closed with no other nominations. Motion carried 5 - O. 6. STAFF REPORT Mr. Hightshoe informed the Commission of the opening of Green Valley Community Park and Soccer Complex on August 17, 1996. Mr. Hightshoe considered contacting businesses on Bedford-Euless Road on adopting the area across from their businesses. Mr. Nerwin stated that he would be responsible for maintaining this area. 7. DISCUSSION OF OTHER ITEMS/CITIZEN INPUT Ms. Pultz would like to have full discussion of the KTB Convention at the next workshop . on August 6, 1996. She felt the Commission received useful information. Discussions were held on the purchase of shirts for Commission members. Ms. Lueck L . . . presented the Commission with prices, colors and sizes. By unanimous agreement, the shirts are to be purchased from B.J.'s with monogramming. They are to be completed before the event at Dan Echols on September 5, 1996. Ms. Pultz requested the Commission's input on purchasing a Rememberence Tree on behalf of the death of Ms. Creecy's son. Ms. Pultz suggested the Commission wait until Fall for this purchase. Mr. Nerwin informed the Commission of classes he was conducting at the Recreation Center on Pond Construction. The classes will be held durin.g the month of September. 8. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Pultz adjourned the meeting at 8:35 p.m. ~. Sandra Miller, Se ary · · · . Teen Court Minutes: Advisory...Board Meeting August 26. 1996 In Attendance: Katie Watson, Kathy Graves, Ron Moore, Lynne Simpson, Bill Moore Absent: Wayne Moody, Tami Spraggins I. Call to order at 6:00 p.m. II. Discussion about scheduling board members for speciñc Teen Court docket nights: Ron, Wayne, and Bill plan on attending all Teen Court dockets and will call Kristina in advance to let her know if they cannot attend. Lynne and Kathy have committed to attending third Monday courts and will attend first Monday courts as schedules permit. Tami will attend all first Monday courts and will be here on third Monday courts as her schedule permits. Katie will try to make it to as many courts as possible, as she has an evening work schedule to work around. III. Discussion about recruitment and training in the new school year: A. Nick Datoo has been recruiting volunteers like crazy at Richland High School. He has already turned in 49 applications (from freshmen and sophomores alone) and he is still planning on speaking to junior English classes later this week. (He said he won't stop until he has 100 applications for us!) Some classes, including the elective Criminal Justice class that Nick is taking, are offering their students extra credit for participating in Teen Court! B. Because of this welcome onslaught of volunteers, we will be having a combined orientationltraining on Monday, September 16 at 6:00. C. If we end up with as many volunteers as we expect after this training, we will increase the Teen Court juries to include 8 members--the original six sentenced jurors and two volunteers who will serve together as foreperson, leading questioning and encouraging discussion. D. Additionally, because of the large volume of volunteers, the Advisory Board began consideration of fund-raising for the banquet and discussed ways to decrease postage costs (ex. sending out calendars with court dates and training information instead of letters for each court). Without more money or less expense, Teen Court cannot support many more volunteers. - · · · ~ IV. Discussion about implementing educational and behavioral programs within Teen Court: The board suggested and discussed different types of programs which could benefit Teen Court defendants. Proposed programs include: parenting groups (both parent and teen attend), anger management, theft intervention, alcohol/drug education, assertiveness training (perhaps as a prerequisite for jury duty), TX State Trooper Association gory movie- thons for traffic offenders, and a peer pressure group (for those defendants who use peer pressure as their defense, regardless of the offense). The board agreed on the following strategy for consideration of such programs: A. Needs Assessment--Kristina will create a questionnaire to be distributed to all juveniles and their parents who come before the Judge in the Municipal Court during the month of September (pending agreement by Judge Oujesky). This anonymous questionnaire would state that Teen Court is considering implementing the programs listed above and would request that parents and teens acknowledge: (1) whether or not the existence of such programs would encourage them to the choose Teen Court option and (2) which of the programs they would be interested in participating in, if any. There would also be space for comments and suggestions for additional programs. B. ProQram Implementation--Based on information gathered from the questionnaires, the most popular program choice will be instituted first. Throughout September, Kristina will work on forming outlines and formats for each program so that everything will be in place and ready for implementation as soon as feedback from parents and teens is obtained. Participating in these programs will be rewarded with community service credit. All programs (with the possible exceptions of assertiveness training for all jurors and gory movies for all traffic offenders) will not be mandatory. Programs involving parental participation will be offered at times convenient for working adults. After the first program is up and running, each additional program will be implemented according to its popularity with parents and teens. The end goal will be to offer all programs on a cyclical schedule so that each is offered a minimum of once every three months. This will create the opportunity for each defendant to participate in any and all of the programs which will benefit him/her. A time line will be prepared prior to implementation. C. ProQram Evaluation--Feedback from parent and teen participants will be used to evaluate the success of each program. Kristina will research and develop tools for evaluation that will be included in the outline of each program. Improvements and changes will be made by the Advisory Board as needed. V. Open discussion: Some board members have observed that jurors are leaving their seats (to go the restroom, get a drink, talk to friends) far to frequently. This causes a great deal of noise and a big distraction for the jury. Additionally, the entrance of previous juries from the rear of the courtroom distracts the jury of the current trial. For these reasons, all courtroom doors will be closed during the entirety of each jury trial. The doors will be "guarded" by volunteers and/or board members. At the end of each trial, the doors will be opened and all volunteers and necessary jurors will be allowed to enter and exit. Jurors who are not currently sitting on a jury will only be permitted to leave the courtroom when the sitting Judge calls for a short recess midway through the jury trial docket. Kristina will inform both Judges that such a break will be necessary. VI. Adjournment at 8:30. - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 9/09/96 Subject: Request of Lincoln Property Company for Replat of Lot 7R1, Agenda Number: PS 96-25 Block 4, North Richland Hills Addition. (Located at the southwest corner of Grapevine Highway and Blaney Avenue) Lincoln Property Company is the owner of a 1.939 acre tract of land located at the southwest corner of Grapevine Highway and Blaney Avenue. The developer has submitted a Replat of the property for review and consideration by the City Council. The plat would create one lot. The following are the major items regarding this Replat. Other comments are included in the attached engineering comments letter. 1. Land Use A Walgreen's drug store is the proposed use of the property. Walgreen's proposes to construct a 13,905 square foot retail store on the site. 2. Thoroughfare Plan This property has frontage on Grapevine Highway, Glenview Drive and Blaney Avenue. The owner is dedicating an additional 15 feet of right of way along Grapevine Highway, and an additional 1 0 feet of right of way along Glenview Drive. It appears that sufficient right of way exists for Blaney Avenue. 3. Sidewalks Sidewalks are required on this property's frontage on Grapevine Highway, Glenview Drive and Blaney Avenue. The sidewalks must be constructed as part of the building construction on the lot. 4. Screening Walls A masonry screening wall is required along the entire west property line of this site. The Zoning Regulations require a masonry screening wall between commercial and residential properties. It is the responsibility of the commercial property owner to construct this wall. 5. Access/Drive Approaches Two drive approaches are proposed on Blaney Avenue. One drive approach is proposed on Glenview Drive. It appears that the drive approach locations meet the minimum criteria established by the Public Works Design Manual. The developer has addressed all engineering comments. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this Final Plat at its August 22, 1996, meeting and recommended approval subject to engineering comments. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available ,Finance Director ~ ~~anager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . . . P&Z Minutes· Page 2 22 August 1996 4. PS 96-25 REQUEST OF LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY FOR REPLAT OF LOT 7R1, BLOCK 4, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ADDITION. (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY AND BLANEY AVENUE) APPROVED Mr. LeBaron stated the tract is 2 acres in size and zoned C-1 and C-2. He stated the property is the site for a Walgreens drug store. He stated a building permit is pending approval of the plat. He stated all requirements have been addressed. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 96-25 subject to engineering comments. The motion was seconded by Mr. Miller. The motion carried 6-0. , BLOCK 3, WO AND OAKS ADDITION. (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ROLLING HILLS DRIVE AND SOUTH CREST DRIVE) APPROVED Mr. LeBaron stat the owner has submitted a replat to reconfigure the lot layout. He stated the original p included a street right of way, but when the street was built, it was built as a cui de s He stated the replat would configure the lots the way it is currently built. Mr. LeBar stated the developer is asking for a waiver of the sidewalk requirement since there are sidewalks in the development. He stated they are asking for a 20 foot front building line match the existing development. He stated the developer will construct a flume t ccommodate drainage. Mr. John Zimmerman, 908 West Main, rlington, came forward to speak. He stated they have agreed to all engineering comm ts. He stated this replat would put the property back into the original Nob Hill confi Mr. Ken Brower, president of the Woodland Oaks forward to speak. He stated his support for the req me-Owners Association, came t. Ms. Jan Sid mark, NRH resident, came forward to speak. traffic, construction, and the standard of living. She stated e stated her concerns about support for the request. Ms. Jenny Kennedy came forward to speak. She stated she is bu . g one of the lots being replatted. She stated her concerns about additional traffic if t roperty to the south develops. Mr. LeBaron stated no. Mr. Nehring asked if the property to the south has an additional exit on Cran Subdivision Plat Review Fact Sheet Case Number PS 96-25 GENERAL INFORMA TION " 1. Owner 2. Developer 3. Engineer 4. Surveyor 5. Acreage 6. No. of Lots 7. Density 8. Zoning 9. Prop. Use UTILITY SERVICES 1. Water Lines 2. Sewer Lines 3. Fire Protection Schuminsky Irrevocable Trust - 82 W Armstrong Dr - Mustang OK 73064 Brenda Pryor - PO Box 628 - Newark 76071 Lincoln Property Company - 500 N Akard St Suite 3300 - Dallas 75201 Warren E. Hagan - 500 Grapevine Hwy Suite 472 - Hurst 76054 Loyd Bransom Surveyors - 1028 N Sylvania Avenue - Fort Worth 76111 1.939 acres 1 nfa C-1 and C-2 Commercial Pharmacy There is a 12 inch water line located on the west side of Blaney Avenue across this property's frontage. A 12 inch water line is also located along the west property line. There is a 6 inch sanitary sewer line located along the west property line. An 8 inch line is also located in the Grapevine Highway right of way. There are two fire hydrants located on the property along Blaney Avenue. A hydrant is also located near the northwest corner on the adjacent residential property. STREETS AND THOROUGHFARES 1. Thoroughfare Plan This property has frontage on Grapevine Highway, Glenview Drive and Blaney Avenue. Grapevine Highway is classified as a P6D Principal Arterial street (130-foot right of way, 6 lanes, divided roadway). Glenview Drive is classified as an M4U Minor Arterial (70 foot right of way, 4 lanes, undivided roadway). Blaney Avenue is classified as a C2U Minor Collector (60 foot right of way, 2 lanes, undivided roadway). 2. Improvements 3. Street Extensions 4. New Streets 5. Street Lights 6. Access 7. Sidewalks 8. Screening Walls None None None Any required street lights will be installed in accordance with Public Works criteria. Primary access to this property is from Blaney Avenue. Secondary access is possible from Glenview Drive. Sidewalks are required to be constructed on all lots when the buildings are constructed. A masonry screening wall is required along the west property line. The Zoning Regulations require a screening wall between commercial and residential property. It is the responsibility of the commercial developer to construct the wall. 9. New Street Names None MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN · 1. Flood Plain Flood Insurance Rate Maps indicate that this property does not lie within the 1 DO-year or SOD-year flood plain. 2. Improvements None. 3. Easements None. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN 1. Development The Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan calls for commercial development in this area. The request is consistent with the development policy set out in the Land Use Plan. 2. Special Issues None. · · CITY OF N@RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works June 25, 1996 MEMO TO: Barry LeBaron Director of Planning and Inspection Services FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E. Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS96-25; NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ADDITION; Block 4, Lot 8; Replat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on June 3, 1996. The following items are for your consideration. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OUTSTANDING ITEMS, WE FEEL THAT THIS PLAT SHOULD NOT BE PLACED ON AGENDA FOR P & Z CONSIDERATION. 1. A vicinity map needs to be added to the plat. Sufficient street names and landmarks need to be included to determine the general location of the Plat. 2. The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication. In addition the surveyor's seal and signature need to be added to the plat prior to filing. 3. The title block needs to be revised as shown. 4. The Metes and Bounds Description and the exhibit are not in agreement. This needs to be resolved with the next submittal. 5. The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 7.5 foot Utility Easement along the rear property line. This needs to be added to the Final Plat. 6. Building setback lines need to be added for the adjacent lots as well as the proposed lot. 7. The current zoning needs to be clearly indicated on the face of the plat. This includes the proposed lot and the adjacent lots. P.O. Box 820609 * North Richland Hills, Texas * 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 *817-581-5521 * FAX 817-656-7503 · 8. Any necessary offsite drainage easements and exhibits need to be prepared and forwarded to the Public Works Department for review. The signed easements need to be transmitted to the Public Works Department for filing with the approved Final Plat. 9. Blaney Avenue is designated as an C2U on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. This designation requires a 60 foot ultimate right-of-way. The ultimate right-of-way requirement is a total of 30 feet west of the existing centerline. Glenview Drive is designated as a M4U on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. This designation requires a 70 foot ultimate ROW. The ultimate ROW requirement is a total of 35 feet north of the existing centerline. Grapevine Highway (State Highway 26) is designated as a P6D. This designation requires a total of 130 foot ultimate ROW. The ultimate ROW requirement is a total of 65 feet from the existing centerline. On all three of these streets the distance from the centerline of the existing roadway to the proposed subdivision shall be shown to determine the adequacy of the ROWand to determine if additional ROW is necessary. Sufficient existing iron pins along the opposite side of the street need to be tied in and shown on the drawing together with dimensions to adequately describe all perimeter streets. · 10. The Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. The sidewalks will need to be added to the construction plans for coordination purposes. The sidewalks need to be shown in the parkway adjacent to the property line. The parkway width is 9'6" from property line to back of curb. This needs to be corrected on the plans. 11. Street Lighting is required by section 1-06 of the Design Manual. The locations of any existing street lights need to be shown on the plans to confirm compliance with current ordinances. Any additional street lights which may be required based on current ordinances need to be coordinated with Public Works and TU Electric. The cost for installation of any additional street lights will be paid by the developer directly to TU Electric. 12. The Design Manual contains criteria for necessary fire hydrant coverage. All existing fire hydrants need to be shown on the topographical drawing. Appropriate coverage radii for the applicable fire hydrants also need to be included. This will assist Public Works in determining whether there is any need for additional fire hydrants. 13. The appropriate details need to be included in the construction plans. The details that were included had the border and title block removed. The Design Manual details do not contain any logos other than that of the City of North Richland Hills, therefore the details need to be used in their entirety. · 14. Inspection fees will be due prior to starting construction. The current rate is four percent for water and sewer and three percent for streets and drainage. 15. A masonry screening wall, not less than 6 foot in height, is required between Single Family zoned lots and Commercial zoned lots. This wall shall be constructed the entire length of the common property line prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Section 1-07 of the Design Manual contains the requirements for masonry wall plans. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to a building permit being issued. This review was based on preliminary plans and was therefore only cursory. The intention of this letter is to comment on items of significant importance to the general concept. A detailed review will be processed when the final plans are submitted. There are numerous comments regarding the engineering and construction plans. These comments are recorded on a set of blueline construction plans. These plans have been returned to the Engineer for revision. The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer of their responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans. The City's eventual approval of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. ~t~~ Jul' W. Skare, P . Sta Engineer JWS\pwm96090 cc: Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director WARREN E. HAGAN, INt.-. Land Development COl1sulta.nt · RE: PS 96-25-LOT 8 BLOCK 4 N. RICHLAND HILLS ADDITION WALLGREEN SITE July 11. 1996 Project 292 J. Clayton Husband AICP City of N. Richland Hills 7301 N.E_ Loop 820 N. Richland Hills. Texas 76180 Following is our response to the various review comments contained in memo dated June 25. 1996 from Julia W. Skare and marked up plans which are returned herewith; · A. FINAL PLAT 1. Items 1 thru 7 and 9 are being addressed by the surveyor-the Plat contained in these plans reflect those revisions. 2. The existing pavement widths were measured on all three streets. The surveyors located pins on the opposite side of the streets to determine additional R.O.W. required. The results are as follows; a. Blaney - No additional R.O.W. b. Glenview - 9.00 feet additional R.O.W. c. Grapevine Hwy. - 15.00 feet additional R.O.W. 3. New R.O.W. lines are also shown on construction plans 4. Item B-No offsite easements required 5. The Plat will be executed by the owners when it is in approved form · B. CONSTRUCTION PLANS 1. Sheet c-10.0·Fence Plan and Profile added 2. Item la-sidewalks adjacent to the new R.O.W. lines are shown on sheets C-3.0 and C-5.0 3. Item 11-existing street lights are shown on Sheet C-1.0 Site Preparation Plan-that intersection is well lighted-Walgreen lights will add to this 4. Item 9-on sheet C-1.0 are shown the various dimensions for street and pavement widths to determine required R.O.W. dedications 5. Item 12-two existing fire hydrants are shown on sheets C-1.0 and C-4.0. A 300 foot radius circle from each hydrant is added to sheet C-4.0 6. Item 13-detail sheets have been revised to include the City Standard-Sewer Service Detail added 7. Item 14-noted OFF7CE - 500 GRAPEVINE f11¥Y' SUITE -172 . HURST. TEXAS 7605-1 PHONE 817-577-/952' FAX 817-788-9-133 8. We have obtained data from TXDOT with regard to the existing storm sewer system along Grapevi ne Hi ghway, that data along wi th requested drai nage calculations is shown on Sheet C-2.0, On site Pipe sizes have been revised with easements added. Copies of TXOOT data are attached. 9. Water services from the 12 inch watermain are shown on Sheet C-4.0-meter sizes reduced to 1 inch 10. Grades at entrance drives have been revised to a minimum of 1/4 inch/ft slope or a maximum of 1/2 inch/ft slope 11. Minor grade changes have been revised due to item 10 above and R.O.W. dedications 12. The sign has been relocated back of new R.O.W. Please continue your review and place the Final Plat on the P&Z agenda as soon as possible. Sincerely, ~ ¿Ó~~~ Warren E. Hagan, P.E. WEH!l cg · CITY OF N*RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works August 2, 1996 MEMO TO: Barry LeBaron Director of Planning and Inspection Services FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E. Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS96-25; NORTH RICH LAND HILLS ADDITION; Block 4, Lot 8; Replat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on July 12, 1996. The following items are for your consideration. ITEM #1 WILL NEED TO BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO THE FINAL PLAT BEING PLACED ON THE AGENDA FOR P & Z CONSIDERATION. 1. There is a water line easement for the detector check vault and a drainage easement for storm sewer improvements which will need to be described by metes and bounds. This will need to be placed on the Final Plat and resubmitted to Public Works for approval. .2. The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication. In addition the surveyor's seal and signature need to be added to the plat prior to filing. 3. A request has been made for the grading plan on the grassy areas on the west and north section of the site. This will help in determining if a drainage easement is required to the south. If any offsite drainage easements and exhibits are needed, they are to be prepared and forwarded to the Public Works Department for review. The signed easements need to be transmitted to the Public Works Department for filing with the approved Final Plat. There are several comments regarding the engineering and construction plans. These comments are recorded on a set of blueline construction plans. These plans have been returned to the Engineer for revision. The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer of their responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans. The City's eventual approval of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. ~ LLß--'- k~ lÞrUu.. Juli W. skareyTI'-V: Sta Engineer .JWS\PWm96104 cc: Kevin B. Miller, P·E.,~~~MÞ1~o~%Ma~if~~~~£fexas ..76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 "817-581-5521' FAX 817-656-7503 I I I ----------------------~ I' I 1 I I I I I I I I I -I , I , I I '- -- --------- ---- ----------_ __L__ ______ _ _______-' ,--- .",-- :. z~ "\ , , \ , , \ , , \ . , '\ , , , . \ , , \. , , \ , \ (/) ç:: (1)" Q) ø ~~ Q.() r---i cD ~ en ø :.->: ...<v <Vt- :>- CI) ¡:::=: ~:Ï: '"d 0 '"C1 Q) òõ ã (/) co--' o ~.g >-.'''' Çl.¡ «j Ç:::: o ~..c .c:..... ~ ~D 2) s... ~ :r:Z ~ ¿/E ::!:J'dd '<t' ~ .....0) -+oJ <vC':) ~ Q,)C'J ", ~ \IJ .......... CL dC/)O ~ ~¡jN o - ~I!)O H Q... <t1 r-- 0 ~ ~ C ~ ent'") _<cxjt'") ,...... s:: 0.c:>: I ~ cÓ O...<vO ~ ¡:: ~ E-o -.:r o 0..:3 0 .r-- () a 0 z ~- c:: oo=~ ......0 C'JQro(\J ......::¡ u ('") l00,-, Þ C 9 5 Þ 8 L C! I. ' n , .. '" QJ +- o g ~ '" ~ U1 0 a: ëÇ C «II ~ 5 !; ti > ~ QJ .c -.J ~ ,.... ·::>UT ·=>05$\.-1 '1(").,.1!f^?t~:1.'r"'"J_' ve e,~ ~ e1 ~ <¢" 'b- .... ..... ~CI) S::~ ~ en~~ s... . ~ ~ ~ O'-:ØCOd ~enooo (\l\{)CO\{) 0 10010 r-- -0) .... - t'") ..... '"C1 ølt! <V Cf) <V Q) ¡:; s... s... 0'- ¡::: -< -< if,;; ~ ( ) "'0 ~ Q) co s... Q)S::'"C1~Ç::::1l.. Hjã5tIDtIDtID tlO_ _.S.S .S ....-1 It! d1~~~ (\j-,~~s...s... :::-ood1lt!ro ,>- E-o E- 0.. a.. a.. EB o I() I() ... l Q : -¡: a · c.. c: .. < ~ ~ ~. r~ <{=. ----"'1 ~: c Q\ u VI ..s; ¿¡ L. 2 L- CI .... .s: ~ fñ ~ ~ o "- ~ "" ~ :\f ~!~ ~ ITil 2 "t:~ 0') 19J §Œ -ë=> o c_ u. ~!:::: ~ ~ .... 0 N :t o o ~ ... on ... I() '" o :z: 3 ,.,...... ; c::"...... t:: r- -... _ .. ',_1 ./ ~" -0 C'J o p:: :.- .... <1> ..... :> ~ <1> --< o VV··J..1. ....\., ~..~ ...._, . . t1A't'-2"'-~~ . .- . . ... _, .j,. .1,..~ WE!;) 1060:1.... WARREN'~ MM~MM ~N~ .L r-.. r 'QC 7-...0'0 . ~~~l.Il ;:: ~. NRH APPLICATION FOR A REPLAT City of Nonn Rlc.nlllnd HIII~ 7301 Northu$1 LOQP 820 North Richland Hills. Texa, 817·561·5500 r..aT 7Rl BU)CK 4 NORTH RICHlAND HILLS ADDITION NORTH RICHLÞ.ND HILLS TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS CunvntLeg~(Oe$cripffQn; PORTION OF LOT 7 BLOCK 4 NORTH RICHLAND HIlLS ADDITION - AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF NORTH RICHI..AND HILLS TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOL. 388-1 , ~. 72 P'~tT.C.T. Name l r1d Ac1Qru:s or Curr!l111P!9JJ.fJrt.Y Sl'tiMJr 1. PHILLIP AND HEL~N SCHUMrNSKY IRREVOCABLE GRAND CHILDREN TRUST MARVIN SMITH ATT. RICHARD P. SHEPARD TRUSTEE 82 ARMSTRONG P"O'IeNo, (214) 739-0606 MUSTAND, OK. 73064 . 2. BRENDA K. PRYOR P.O. BOX 638 NEWARK, TEXAS 76071 Phone No. (817) 489-2222 Nam$ ~I\d Addf8:S& of Pte.,'Ollð Ownet:(il purchu~ during/ISI twelve m017/II,) N/A N~mê ff'l(j Addreu 01 DellQlopef: LINCOlN PROPERTY COMPANY 500 N. AKARD STREET # 3300 DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 PhOIl.No·(214) 740-3365 Name and AdØlU$ 01 Engln.er. WARREN E. HAGAN, INC. 500 GRAPEVINE, HIGHWAY #472 HURST, TEXAS 76054 Phon. No, (817) 577-1 CJ52 Type 01 Delle/Opml!Jt'If B.lng PfOpo$fÓ: o SF Res/dentlal o Duple. Rsaic1fJntlel o MF Re"áential Qt] Commerclal/ Ináu3tr1øl o Olhe, Applicarïon Fee: ,. Appllcallon Fee 2. Numbe, of resldenliallols @ $1.50 per 101: 3. Number 01 non-reSld."Uat 10lS ~ 55.00 per ilcnI 4. Number 01 Itreet inter-saction 5IQns @ $65,00 each 5. County plat filing fee: 120.00 9.70 58.00 TOTAL FEE J187.70 Dale: ~7e~~y C41rt/fy IhQt 111m. Of røp,e,ent. 'he I~al OWII.' o( IllS þroperty aucnOeá lboy. IJlld øo l1err:by 3vbmil tni3 Repløllo Inll ennmg and Zoning Cotnmi$$ion fo' cons/aefl/lon. (Atr,eh IJfflal/llil witll al/ proþerty owne,..s nomtU when more Ihðn 011. owner 'flllolve" I 5/3/1'1.h I I Print Name: Sl9"~/ure: OFFICE USE ONLY Taxes Paid LIens PalO AS5enmenls Pilid REPLAT CD· 403 \2.J~G) I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 9/09/96 Subject: Request of Crown Oaks Inc. for Replat of Lots 7R, 8R and 9R, Agenda Number: PS 96-27 Block 3, Woodland Oaks Addition. (Located at the southeast corner of Rolling Hills Drive and South Crest Drive) Crown Oaks Inc. is the developer of a 0.733 acre tract of land located at the southeast corner of Rolling Hills Drive and South Crest Drive in the Woodland Oaks subdivision. The developer has submitted a Replat of the property for review and consideration by the City Council. The following are the major items regarding this Replat. Other comments are included in the attached engineering comments letter. 1. General Conditions The streets adjacent to the property under consideration are constructed as a cuI de sac. However, the right of way on the recorded plat shows Rolling Hills Drive dedicated as a straight street ending at the south property line. The owners have submitted a Replat to plat the property as it is constructed. (see Comment No.4) 2. Zoning This property is presently zoned R-2 Single Family Residential. The R-2 district requires a minimum lot size of 9,000 square feet, and a minimum dwelling unit size of 1,800 square feet. Houses built on these lots will also require a side or rear entry garage. The proposed lots appear to meet the minimum criteria of the R-2 zoning district. 3. Sidewalks Sidewalks are required on this property's frontage on South Crest Drive and Rolling Hills Drive. I!1e owner is requesting a waiver of this requirement since there are no sidewalks in the development 4. Access to Adjacent Property The proposed plat would vacate an unimproved street right of way that provides access to the property to the south. The property to the south is platted; however, the property was never improved or developed. The property to the south hås extensive frontage on Crane Road, but the property has no platted access to this street. The City Council must adopt a separate ordinance to vacate the right of way. 5, Drainage A drainage analysis is required to determine the size of an overland concrete flume to be located between lots 7R 1 and 8R 1. The flume will tie into an existing 20 foot flume to the east. 6. Building Lines The R-2 zoning district requires a front building line of 25 feet. The owner is requesting that the front building line be changed to 20 feet to match the rest of the development. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this Replat at its August 22, 1996, meeting and recommended approval subject to engineering comments, a 20 foot front building line, a waiver of the sidewalk requirement, and that the flume be constructed prior to any building permits being issued on the affected lots. RECOMMENDA TION: It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available ,Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM P&Z Minutes· Page 2 22 August 1996 . 4. PS 96-25 REQUEST OF LINCOLN PROPERTY COM PAN NORTH RICH LAND HILLS ADDITION. (L GRAPEVINE HIG REPLAT OF LOT 7R1, BLOCK 4, ED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AND BLANEY AVENUE) APPROVED Mr. LeBaron stated the is 2 acres in size and zoned C-1 and C-2. He stated the property is the site a Walgreens drug store. He stated a building permit is pending t. He stated all requirements have been addressed. en made the motion to approve PS 96-25 subject to engineering comments. 5. PS 96-27 REQUEST OF CROWN OAKS INC. FOR REPLA T OF LOTS 7R, 8R AND 9R, BLOCK 3, WOODLAND OAKS ADDITION. (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ROLLING HILLS DRIVE AND SOUTH CREST DRIVE) APPROVED . Mr. LeBaron stated the owner has submitted a replat to reconfigure the lot layout. He stated the original plat included a street right of way, but when the street was built, it was built as a cui de sac. He stated the replat would configure the lots the way it is currently built. Mr. LeBaron stated the developer is asking for a waiver of the sidewalk requirement since there are no sidewalks in the development. He stated they are asking for a 20 foot front building line to match the existing development. He stated the developer will construct a flume to accommodate drainage. Mr. John Zimmerman, 908 West Main, Arlington, came forward to speak. He stated they have agreed to all engineering comments. He stated this replat would put the property back into the original Nob Hill configuration. Mr. Ken Brower, president of the Woodland Oaks Home-Owners Association, came forward to speak. He stated his support for the request. Ms. Jan Sid mark, NRH resident, came forward to speak. She stated her concerns about traffic, construction, and the standard of living. She stated her support for the request. Ms. Jenny Kennedy came forward to speak. She stated she is buying one of the lots being replatted. She stated her concerns about additional traffic if the property to the south develops. . Mr. Nehring asked if the property to the south has an additional exit on Crane Road. Mr. LeBaron stated no. P&Z Minutes· Page 3 22 August 1996 Mr. Nehring asked how many lots can one entrance to a subdivision support. Mr. LeBaron stated there are no engineering studies on that subject, but by observing existing subdivisions in the city 45-50 lots seems to be a working number. Mr. Zimmerman stated the property to the south has a prospective buyer and he is going through a feasibility study at this time. There was general discussion regarding gated streets. Ms. Spicer made the motion to approve PS 96-27 subject to the following requirements: engineering comments, a 20 foot front building line, a waiver of the sidewalk requirement, and that the flume be constructed prior to issuing any building permits on the affected lots. The motion was seconded by Mr. Owen. The motion carried 6-0. 6. PS 96-25 ULP ITION. (LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND NORTHEAST PARKWAY) APPROVED d the vacant tract is 25 acres in size. He stated the City Council recently approve zoning change on a portion of t~e tract to a Planned Development. He stated the owne s indicated he will submit additional replats. He stated staff is asking that the Comml 'on withhold any building permits until a drainage study or subsequent replat is sub ted. He stated the right of way for Northeast Parkway is being rededicated on this pi There was general discussion reg ing the right of way for Northeast Parkway. Ms. Lou Baker, resident on Odell Stree ame forward to speak. She asked if a drainage study had been submitted regarding the t s on the common property line. Mr. LeBaron stated the developer is required to submit of the replat of the residential portion of the property. came forward to speak. He stated she lopment approval. Mr. John Zimmerman, 908 West Main, Arlingt is speaking about a requirement of the planned d etailed drainage study as part Mr. Vernon Smith, Jr., developer of the property, came forwar speak. He stated they intend to submit a detailed drainage study at the time the re ntial portion is developed. He stated they are not ready to develop that portion of t property at this time. He stated they will submit a replat of the property in the near fu Mr. Smith stated they intend to have an arborist take a look at the situation to make ecific recommendations regarding the trees. Subdivision Plat Review Fact Sheet Case Number PS 96-27 . GENERAL INFORMA TlON 1. Owner 2. Developer 3. Engineer 4. Surveyor 5. Acreage 6. No. of Lots 7. Density 8. Zoning 9. Prop. Use UTILITY SERVICES 1. Water Lines 2. Sewer Lines 3. Fire Protection . N&S Development - 2000 E Lamar - Arlington 76006 Crown Oaks Inc - 2000 E Lamar - Arlington 76006 John Zimmerman - 908 West Main - Arlington 76011 same 0.733 acres (31,929 square feet) 3 4.09 units per acre R-2 Single Family Residential Single family residences An 8 inch water line is located on the north side of South Crest Drive and on the east side of Rolling Hills Drive. A 6 inch sanitary sewer line is located on the south side of South Crest Drive. An 8 inch line is located on-the west side of Rolling Hills Drive. A hydrant is located approximately 500 feet to the west and the corner of South Crest Drive and Hickory Place Court. Another hydrant is located approximately 600 feet to the north at the corner of Rolling Hills Drive and High Oaks Drive. STREETS AND THOROUGHFARES 1. Thoroughfare Plan This property has frontage on Rolling Hills Drive and South Crest Drive. Both streets are classified as a R2U Residential streets (50-foot right of way, 2 lanes, undivided roadway). 2. Improvements None 3. Street Extensions The proposed plat would vacate an unimproved street right of way that provides access to the property to the south. The property to the south is platted; however, the property was never improved. The property to the south has extensive frontage on Crane Road, but the property has no platted access to this street. 4. New Streets 5. Street Lights 6. Access 7. Sidewalks 8. Screening Walls . 9. New Street Names None Any required street lights will be installed in accordance with Public Works criteria. Primary access to this property is from Rolling Hills Drive and South Crest Drive. Sidewalks are required to be constructed on all lots when the buildings are constructed. None required. None MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN 1. Flood Plain Flood Insurance Rate Maps indicate that this property does not lie within the 100-year or SOO-year flood plain. 2. Improvements None. 3. Easements None. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN 1. Development The Comprehensive land Use Master Plan calls for low density single family development in this area. The request is consistent with the development policy set out in the land Use Plan. 2. Special Issues None. . CITY OF N*RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works July 1, 1996 MEMO TO: Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning and Inspection Services FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E., Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS96-27; WOODLAND OAKS ADDITION; Block 3, Lots 7R1, 8R1, 9R1; Replat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on June 10, 1996. The following items are for your consideration. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OUTSTANDING ITEMS, WE FEEL THAT THIS PLAT SHOULD NOT BE PLACED ON AGENDA FOR P & Z CONSIDERATION. 1. A Preliminary Drainage Analysis and Utility Plan is required with the next submittal. 2. The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 7.5 foot Utility Easement along the rear property line. This needs to be added to the Final Plat. Additional Utility and Drainage easements may be required. This will be determined when additional information is provided. . 3. A topographical drawing is required by the Subdivision Ordinance. This drawing needs to include mt permanent above ground features as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. The drawing needs to include by not limited to pavement, buildings, poles, sidewalks and contours. The drawing also needs to indicate all existing underground utilities. 4. The Owner's signature needs to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication. In addition the surveyor's seal and signature need to be added to the plat prior to filing. 5. The title block needs to be revised as shown. 6. The City has obtained a Global Positioning System (GPS) Horizontal Control Survey. This survey was accomplished to create an accurate base map for the Geographical Information System. City policy requires that all new plats be tied by survey to the GPS. This will allow the City to keep the GIS up-to-date. The Public Works Department has written descriptions for all of the GPS Benchmarks located around the City. The Final Plat needs to include the NAD83 Texas State Plane Coordinates for at least two property corners. The coordinates need to be determined by a survey tied to the City's GPS monuments. . P.O. Box 820609 .. North Richland Hills, Texas * 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820.. 817-581-5521 .. FAX 817-656-7503 7. The front building setback line for R-2 zoning is 25 feet. The building setback line for the original plat was 20 feet. 8. The current zoning needs to be clearly indicated on the face of the plat. This includes the proposed lots and the adjacent lots. 9. All drainage easements dedicated between lots need to include an overland concrete flume. The size will be determined by the Engineers Drainage Analysis. The north-south flume between Lots 7R1 and 8R1 will need to tie into the flume from the east. The existing ROW at this location will require a street and ROW vacation. 10. If the offsite easements and exhibits are needed, they will need to be prepared and forwarded to the Public Works Department for review. All offsite easements will be filed by the City. 11. South Crest Drive and Rolling Hills Drive are designated as R2U on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. This designation requires a 50 foot ultimate right-of-way. The ultimate right-of-way requirement is a total of 25 feet from the existing centerline. Sufficient existing iron pins along the opposite side of the street need to be tied in and .shown on the drawing together with dimensions to adequately describe these streets. This needs to be shown on the next submittal. 12. The Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. Sidewalks may be constructed with the improvement of each individual lot. The Woodland Oaks Addition does not have sidewalks on the developed lots. 13. The Design Manual contains criteria for necessary fire hydrant coverage. All existing fire hydrants need to be shown on the topographical drawing. Appropriate coverage radii for the applicable fire hydrants also need to be included. This will assist Public Works in determining the need for additional fire hydrants. This review was based on the Final Plat submitted. The intention of this letter is to comment on items of significant importance to the general concept. A detailed review will be processed when the Drainage Analysis and Utility Plans are submitted. The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. ¿bÆ~~ JW.}lsmm/pwm9 92 cc: Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director . JOHN D. ZIMMERMAN P.E.,R.P.S. 908 W. MAIN STREET ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76013 (817) 461-0188 July 30, 1996 City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182 Re: P5 96-27 Woodland Oaks Addition Block 3 Lots 7R 1, 8R 1, 9R 1 Replat I offer the following response to the letter of comment dated July 1, 1996 . 1. Preliminary Drainage Analysis and Utility Plan submitted with revised plat. 2. Utility Easement along the rear of lots increased to 7.5 feet 3. Portion of City to po map submitted with utilities plotted on map 4. Acknowledge requirements for signatures prior to plat filing 5. Title Block revised as required 6. GPS Added to two property corners 7. Request that a waiver of 25 foot building line to 20 foot building line consistence with remainder of the addition 8. Zonings added to the plats 9. The drainage easement to be determined by the drainage analysis and approved by the Engineering Dept. 10. No apparent offside easements needed 11. Found Iron Rods for Row shown on revised copy of plat 12. Request a waiver on sidewalk requirement, since remainder of the Addition does not have sidewalks 13. The Fire Hydrants meet the design criteria Sincer~y, .~~ ?:f~ .k,h~ D. Zimm ma P.~., R.P.S. . CITY OF N*RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works August 9, 1996 MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E. Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS96-27; WOODLAND OAKS ADDITION; Block 3, Lots 7R1, 8R1, 9R1; Replat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on July 30, 1996. The following items are for your consideration. 1. The Owner's signature needs to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication. In addition the surveyor's seal and signature need to be added to the plat prior to filing. 2. The existing ROW between lots 7R1 and 8R1 will require a street and ROW vacation. A note should be placed on the plat stating ROW vacated by City Ordinance Number 3. The Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. Sidewalks may be constructed with the improvement of each individual lot. The Woodland Oaks Addition does not have sidewalks on the developed lots, therefor we are not opposed to a waiver on this requirement. 4. Construction plans will be required for the proposed flume. The flume will need to tie into the existing 20 foot curb inlet. The inlet will need to be modified to an open back inlet. Hay bales will need to be placed at the end of the flume. 5. The sewer services for lots 7R1 & 8R1 will need to be excavated and possibly extended beyond the curb line prior to construction of the flume. Construction of the flume will need to be complete prior to building permits being issued for Lots 7R1 and 8R1. JWS\pwm96107 cc: Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning and Inspection Services P.O. Box 820609 . North Richland Hills, Texas. 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 ·817-581-5521 . FAX 817-656-7503 JOHN D. ZIMMERMAN P.E.,R.P.S. . 908 W. MAIN STREET ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76013 (817) 461-0188 August 15, 1996 City of North Richland Hills 7301 North East Loop 820 N. Richland Hills, Texas 76182 Planning and Zoning Commission Re: PS 96-27 Woodland Oaks Addition Block 3 Lots 7Rl, 8Rl, 9Rl Replat I otTer the following response to your letter of comment dated August 9, 1996: 1. Owner's signature to be added to the mylar after approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission with the Surveyor Seal and Signature. 2. Note Added to the Plat. . 3. Comment Acknowledged. 4. Construction plan for the flume to be prepared after plot approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 5. Sewer Services to be verified and extended as required during flume construction. ~ ~~ereIY'= John D. Zimme n E., R.P.L.S. . . "8 !!. . tn a:. <1- tn ~~ ~~ \II!l ~.. ~: . no . : .. <1- Q.. ~ . ~' ..' -<' cc , ç ~. 'iJ.' --- ,.... ------~.-.~-f-.-.. ... _. , " ....... _ , h " :.:.:.::~ . . . . . . . . . . . -"." -. . . . . . . . . . -- -...,~~.,~.- . . . . . . . . . " "r . . . . . . ,..!f......, ." . .. . . . . . . -., .. - . . . . . . . . . . . ........~.... .......... -. - L -- .. ..... ')-'-=,- ~...'";...............--_.... ..::.-.~ - i r - r ~ -. - - '" , '"§ G ~ all ~.J ~. ~ ..-... ~ . ~ .... 1~;; ~~~ ~:r~~m..~.~, ~~r-:-~ ' "t. "". ~"'- (Ø .. ~.. = '" '--- . . _ II> ~ ex:. ~ CI :: ,~. CDI--:- _ , ~-~.. _ /".'1 ~ , ~ ~ ' , ) -:-~" ~ ~r!; ,~, ]_. +T¡~: .~ '~J.;;;;' .' ~ i~!i 'v·~;'.~ :, ," 'Jf: -, * ,J; 1 ,L ~. ,; I ~ ~ --l~ .. ",", r', '", . h- _ I! IJ.. ¡ · · " - ~; .'.,' . .; , .--.-,.-,_ ~t' I '." '1:,,', · ;J' ",J, .......'.:.1'.,. ( :_I_~~' - ~ .' · :'i"'" .,......: ~ , ',,:.. , ~~::: L:::I ~ '4. lIa~]'""" ""'ili:':':"¡¡¡¡;¡¡µ;it '...;, ~~,. ,,__ 0>- ~~ ., , - , , ' ~ · ~ ~::' .. '. <k:- . " ". -~ I!~i! JlYO HJ.IIO !! ~" ""~ " "" . ." c--, ..f".h~""" '. · - ,'. · . .' '-.. ¡., . 0 _" e!~ ~ ~~ ;; 1<:' ~ -... .....;, .jj~ ,~ I<: ' ~ ~~ l_~ ~ 3~VÅh'~V: ~ '\ .. .. !:!". . '~. ",I- '" . , i ~ ~ "I' " '" ",¡¡' '" .] : ~ ~ ~ _",:, ~;;' I '~~.' ':. ' '-, , · ,~o Q¡ ~ """'" ',':1 . > ~" ~ ~ /:; ~,. ~-f--~ ' +- . '" " "'"- I . . '~. . Ô~f---- _ , I õ\ JI~. ,. . u.,,'''~ 'C-::-:~,..">,,, " ' .' ," oj .:.;. ,. ~ . ¡ ':., ,J',"--.. ~ 'I =~ l' . -I ...: -I :::~~' " '5. ~ - '. .' .' .. . : 1 _ ~ u I ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ -.1% N I ; ';0 ~ I ~ ~ .;.. I +- ~""-.- JOO... I\':\ 1 I:; i:¡ ., ~ · L. . ~"'" 0 . . . . . .--- , c.-, , J;'~!;", <.J . .. :~ .:õ ~ ,: ", ~: -\ ' , -::.t', · '*' ..,.," ~. '^ -f". . -' , '\ ~ f. I Ij, . · - - . ., ~ ~ þ:~ 0, Slj \ " 'T f..., I L-o-, '-' ç;,,,. ~ '<:'i:' I: 0 " ----::.,-.y- - ~ ~, '", '. ' · ,.. 'I':. ;:L"j1. .:.'I \ . 1 . J ;. · ': '. r>-'#t:!! ~~~.. .--"'-,or - J.S IIU1U I_I! = I!" ~ -~/ . ~ ~~ ~ ~ . \~l~ l~ -f --- I. · . .. " · .. , ". ~ no" - '\ '~ic -.- ~ --: . ~ . ¡. ; ¡, ¡. . --''' e . ~ . \ ,. " ,.. I ~~ I ~1t ~ !;~ I I! -. I! /~:"'t. ~ _S~ lJa S) ~~." . , ". ~ .,g' . " " ~~. ,. ., ,. / '"':~ c, ' . ' .,. õ _ "-~ .. I,.,.., . . .., r<' I" " '" . ~', ~ ~TI . '\í". '1" . . : ~'G\\ ~ ::~ :.:_ ~ ../ "- J I.--'"'" ~ · ,: .; '. " '[It. "'"'''' _~ '-=- .>' ,. ". ,! ,. - , 't:· I _v...,..."'1 " ,.,..", ' ,..:;.. . ..,~, L I 0'.. '2. tv-_ '''1 ,1'1'"" ".þ- , ~_. P I " ~ ':!.' ~\ " 0:'·0' · " "þ~ ., . 0." I : =; Œ1.~ ;t' ':~" - 4" 4... 4? "., N _. L- ,_1 ~... -4 .~.. "~~ . - ~ ';' ,#,' .~,...... ~ .I.,) allYT1o,) ~ ~ ~ _ ~ '!. ¡ ! '^ ". , · . T-'l~ . ~ '! .. , .' · ¡! -'"- ~ . .,' "" ." ". , .. :'.;. ,,- -~N .... J..) A3Nlll1; ¿---::-: "- ¡'. · "'. C" ~. ~1 ", .!., ,'" . ". .. ~ ,. , ,. ~ , . . :1" <' ¡ .'", I~:! ~;.~~~': ~j.'._,,:'~"'I"'" ~-... '..' >---;. 'ói, ~t-:; . · .", 1é1. " .. I-!~f _:;;;; , "¡' . r--..,.' " ii\: J' :"<J> I T r :1! ~ .. T'T', ~,. '. ". ::- ~ 'f4>' r.-;:c;..1;." ItT: J . 1 ;.'" ""~ . r" ,_ I ~ ~~~t!tG~ r-- ... J~r--,f 'I _ 1 _ c ¡----.. ~. '¡j~J : :¡._ ~ ~ ~_ _. J~I I~J~I'-' ' _ _ " ';j~ Ilx . ~~ I!.; ~ § ~ '" ., C !:! ~ I....; : ><,... . ¡ ~.. ~! , , . ,,~ .. ! ~' - i n . ~ '. '... ~,.. - os ~,.. .. ~~i ., ::. ¿. I ..~ ~~ -. ~N " :~ - , ~~ I!!~ " ï~ I!!~ - 1--,,, .)' ~~ I!!- ~ ~ , I!! - ., i~ ~. I!! " ~l a _ ~ OJ ,., " , . City of North Richland Hills NRH APPLICATION FOR A 7301 N.E. Loop 820 FINAL PLAT . North Richland Hills. TX {PI_ print y<u ,---' 817· 581- 5515 Proposed Subdivision Name: L0t I R \ J Lo;t6R.-\ cd: Lot 9 «. \ / B\ocJc. 3/ lL-""CODLA W D OÞ--K5 Cu"ent Legal Description: Let ì R., lQ..t 2,(L <f \.o.-t q e., ß\CC-¥- 3, LŒODLÞ\WD OAKS . Name and Address of Cu"ent Property Owner: N if S De\Je\..ope:rnen.i- PhoneNo.(snj% \ - \ffiì ~cOO E .L.:Q("'N::t., r I; f'\qtDf'\ TI£ ìr",,",",cv ~ Name and Address of Previous Owner: (If purchased during past twelve months) Name and Address of Developer: C.rOLùÎ'l 0'aX.S \nc.. Phone No{Ô\ 1 ) 4<0 \ - \00 \ 'LOCO E· La~r Arli f\q+Dn , TI( ìroOOfo Name and Address of Engineer: JDhn 0, C¡ r'nrn.ermCV'\ PhoneNo·(S\l) ~\ -D\BR gOBle>. Ha.-'n 5J Aí¡;nc¡ro'"\, Ty ìCcDI\ Type of Develepment Being PropO$ed: [1g SF Residential o loAF Residential o Other o Duplex Residential o Commercial I Industrial Final Plat Application Fee Calculation: 1. Application fee: $120.00 2. Number of residential lets @ $1.50 per lot 4.50 3. Number 01 non-resldential acres tI $5.00 per acre: - 4. Number of street intersection signs 0 $65.00 each: - 5. County plat recording fee: ffi,OO Total lee: IMti) I hereby csr1ify that I am. or represent, the legal owner 01 the property described above and do hereby submit this Final Plat to the Planning and Zoning Commission fer consideration. Date: c-II&/~~ App/icant's Phone No.: (t>Cl) ':\-c-\ - 0\,86 Yourname(PrintedName): 10 l ,.,U~ -=t:. r"", fIo-¡';"/,u¿"'1 /L~ ~ -z0 - Signature: ,., " / I Note: Please complete and submit the "Final Plat Documen~ Submittal Checklist· ~e reverse side of this form. 1"Sq~l1.l . . FINAL PLAT CD·402 (S . 94) "" ,.... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 9/09/96 Subject: Request of Kingsgate Corporation for Replat of Lot 2R, Block 2, Agenda Number: PS 96-29 Culp Addition. (Located at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Northeast Parkway) Kingsgate Corporation is the developer of a 24.994 acre tract of land located at the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Northeast Parkway. The developer has submitted a Replat of the property for review and consideration by the City Council. The plat would subdivide the property into three lots. The following are the major items regarding this Replat. Other comments are included in the attached engineering comments letter. 1. Zoning This property is presently zoned 1-2 Medium Industrial and Planned Development 21. Planned Development No. 21 was approved for single family detached dwellings. 2. Access This property has 517.5 feet of frontage on Davis Boulevard, an Arterial street. The minimum driveway and street entrance spacing allowed on Arterials is 500 feet. One drive approach on Davis Boulevard will be allowed regardless of the number of individual lots within the 500 foot distance. 3. Right of Way Dedication The right of way for a portion of Northeast Parkway was vacated by the previous plat. However, the pavement and utilities were never removed. Since the road still exists and provides access to the residential development to the east, the right of way for Northeast Parkway will be rededicated on this plat. 4. Residential Development The area zoned for single family development will require a significant amount of street, drainage and utility improvements. This area will need to be replatted prior to issuing any building permits on the commercial and industrial lots. 5. Drainage Study The developer is requesting a waiver of the drainage study requirement for this plat submittal, since the intent of this plat is to make possible the division of ownership of the various tracts. 6. Screening Walls A masonry screening wall is required along the entire property line between the area zoned 1-2 and the area zoned PD-21. The Zoning Regulations require a masonry screening wall between industrial and residential properties. It is the responsibility of the commercial property owner to construct this wall. The developer has addressed all engineering comments. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this Replat at its August 22, 1996, meeting and recommended approval subject to engineering comments, a drainage study be submitted on the lots prior to building permits, and a driveway access easement be shown on the plat. RECOMMENDA TION: It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available ,Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM P&Z Minutes· Page 3 22 August 1996 · Mr. Nehring asked how many lots can one entrance to as' Mr. LeBaron stated there are no engineering stu' on that subject, but by observing existing subdivisions in the city 45-50 lots ms to be a working number. Mr. Zimmerman stated the prope to the south has a prospective buyer and he is going through a feasibility study a IS time. ussion regarding gated streets. Ms. Spicer: ade the motion to approve PS 96-27 subject to the following requirements: engin ng comments, a 20 foot front building line, a waiver of the sidewalk rement, and that the flume be constructed prior to issuing any building permits on · 6. PS 96-25 REQUEST OF KINGSGA TE CORPORATION FOR REPLA T OF LOT 2R, BLOCK 2, CULP ADDITION. (LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND NORTHEAST PARKWAY) APPROVED Mr. LeBaron stated the vacant tract is 25 acres in size. He stated the City Council recently approved a zoning change on a portion of the tract to a Planned Development. He stated the owner has indicated he will submit additional replats. He stated staff is asking that the Commission withhold any building permits until a drainage study or subsequent replat is submitted. He stated the right of way for Northeast Parkway is being rededicated on this plat. There was general discussion regarding the right of way for Northeast Parkway. Ms. Lou Baker, resident on Odell Street, came forward to speak. She asked if a drainage study had been submitted regarding the trees on the common property line. Mr. John Zimmerman, 908 West Main, Arlington, came forward to speak. He stated she is speaking about a requirement of the planned development approval. Mr. LeBaron stated the developer is required to submit a detailed drainage study as part of the replat of the residential portion of the property. · Mr. Vernon Smith, Jr., developer of the property, came forward to speak. He stated they intend to submit a detailed drainage study at the time the residential portion is developed. He stated they are not ready to develop that portion of the property at this time. He stated they will submit a replat of the property in the near future. Mr. Smith stated they intend to have an arborist take a look at the situation to make specific recommendations regarding the trees. P&Z Minutes· Page 4 22 August 1996 Mr. Smith asked if it is possible to get a building permit on the corner lot without c" studying the drainage on the remainder of the tract. Mr. Miller stated they will accept a drainage study on a particular lot provided the study covers all the water that comes to the lot and exits that lot. Mr. Owen made the motion to approve PS 96-29 subject to the following requirements: engineering comments, a drainage study be submitted on the lots prior to issuing a building permit, and the driveway access easement be shown on the plat. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. The motion carried 6-0. None. David Barfield, Chairman ning & Zoning Commission STAFF REPORT None. There being no further business, the meeting was a Charles Owen, Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission ~ubdivision Plat Review Fact Sheet Case Number PS 96-29 .GENERAL INFORMA TION 1. Owner 2. Developer 3. Engineer 4. Surveyor 5. Acreage 6. No. of Lots 7. Density 8. Zoning 9. Prop. Use UTILITY SERVICES 1. Water Lines 2. Sewer Lines 3. Fire Protection . Haverty Furniture Company - 866 W Peachtree Street NW - Atlanta GA 30308 Kingsgate Corporation - 3511 North Hall Street #202 - Dallas 75219 John Zimmerman - 908 West Main Street - Arlington 76011 same 24.994 acres 3 n/a 1-2 Medium Industrial and Planned Development No. 21 Commercial/industrial development and single family residences There is an 8 inch water line located on the south side of Northeast Parkway. A 2 inch line also exists on the south side of Odell Street, but this line is not adequate to service this development. A 6 inch abandoned line is located in the old Tradonna Drive right of way. There is a 6 inch sanitary sewer line located on the north side of Northeast Parkway, and an 8 inch line on the south side of Odell Street. A 6 inch abandoned line is located in the old Tradonna Drive right of way. A hydrant is located at the extreme northeast corner of the tract. There is also one hydrant near the middle of the property on the Odell Street side. Two hydrants are located on Northeast Parkway. STREETS AND THOROUGHFARES 1. Thoroughfare Plan This property has frontage on Davis Boulevard, Northeast Parkway and Odell Street. Davis Boulevard is classified as a P6D Principal Arterial (120 foot right of way, 6 lanes, divided roadway). Northeast Parkway and Odell Street are both classified as R2U Residential streets (50 foot right of way, 2 lanes, undivided roadway). 2. Improvements 3. Street Extensions 4. New Streets 5. Street Lights 6. Access 7. Sidewalks 8. Screening Walls . When the single family area is developed, street improvements will be required. None None Any required street lights will be installed in accordance with Public Works criteria. Primary access to this property is from Davis Boulevard. Secondary access is from Northeast Parkway and Odell Street. Sidewalks are required to be constructed on all lots when the buildings are constructed. A masonry screening wall is required between Lots 2R 1 and 4. The Zoning Regulations require a masonry screening wall between commercial and residential property. It is the responsibility of the commercial property developer to construct the wall. 9. New Street Names None MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN 1. Flood Plain Flood Insurance Rate Maps indicate that this property does not lie within the 1 DO-year or 500-year flood plain. 2. Improvements 3. Easements 4. Drainage Study None. None. The developer is requesting a waiver of the drainage study requirement for this plat submittal, since the intent of this plat is to make possible the division of ownership of the various tracts. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN 1. Development The Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan calls for commercial, industrial and single family development in this area. The request is consistent with the development policy set out in the Land Use Plan. 2. Special Issues None. . CITY OF N<$RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works .3. 8. . August 7, 1996 MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E., Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS96-29; CULP ADDITION; Block 2, Lots 2R, 3 & 4; Replat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on July 17, 1996. The following items are for your consideration. 1. The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication. In addition the surveyor's seal and signature need to be added to the plat prior to the plat being filed. 2. The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 7.5 foot Utility Easement along the rear property line. This needs to be added with the next submittal. The intersection of Davis Boulevard and Northeast Parkway will require a sidewalk and utility easement as defined in the Design Manual. This easement needs to be clearly indicated. 4. Building setback lines need to be revised and added for the proposed lots as well as the lots adjacent to this plat. 5. The current zoning needs to be clearly indicated on the face of the plat for the proposed lots as well as the lots adjacent to this plat. 6. Odell Street and Northeast Parkway are designated as R2U on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. This designation requires a 50 foot ultimate right-of-way. It appears sufficient right-of-way has been dedicated, however it needs to be tied to the existing back of curb. 7. The minimum driveway and street entrance spacing allowed on Arterials is 500 feet. Davis Boulevard (FM 1938) is an Arterial with 517.5 feet offrontage, therefor one drive approach off of Davis Boulevard is permitted regardless of the number of lots which have frontage. Davis Boulevard (FM 1938) is a State highway facility. A Texas Department of Transportation permit is required with WÍQr written approval from the City of North Richland Hills. The Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. If and when the site is developed, sidewalks will need to be added to the construction plans for coordination purposes. P.O. Box 820609 .. North Richland Hills, Texas.. 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 * 817-581-5521 .. FAX 817-656-7503 9. A topographical drawing I~ required by the Subdivision Ordim:u Ice. This drawing needs to include all permanent above ground features as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. The drawing needs to include but not limited to pavement, buildings, poles, sidewalks and J contours. The drawing also needs to indicate all existing underground utilities. Some of these features are currently shown on the replat and should be removed from the exhibit. 10. Street Lighting is required by section 1-06 of the Design Manual. If and when the site is developed, the locations of any existing street lights need to be shown on the construction plans to confirm compliance with current ordinances. Any additional street lights which may be required based on current ordinances need to be coordinated with Public Works and TU Electric. The cost for installation of any additional street lights will be paid by the developer directly to TU Electric. 11. The Design Manual contains criteria for necessary fire hydrant coverage. All existing fire hydrants need to be shown on the topographical drawing. Appropriate coverage radii for the applicable fire hydrants also need to be included. This will assist Public Works in determining the need for additional fire hydrants. 12. The Right of Way for Northeast Parkway was previously vacated by plat and needs to be rededicated between Lots 4 & 5. 13. Per the Zoning Regulation, Section 920, B1 for all new construction on all property zoned 1-2 which abuts any single family residential zoning district, a permanent screening wall of masonry type construction shall be erected prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. This will require a masonry wall between lots 3 & 4. 14. Lots 4 & 5 are zoned PD-21 and will require significant street, drainage and utility improvements. Therefor lots 4 & 5 will need to be replatted in accordance with the Zoning and Subdivision Regulations prior to building permits being issued on Lots 2R1, 3, 4, or 5. This review was based on a replat without plans and was therefore limited. A detailed review will be processed when the final plans along with a utility layout and preliminary drainage analysis are submitted. This will be required prior to building permits being issued. The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. ~~µg¿ Julia . Skare, P.E. . Staff ngineer JWS\pwm96105 cc: Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning & Inspection Services · 12. Rededication of the Right of Way for Northeast Parkway has been added to the Plat. . 13. Acknowledge requirement for a masonery screening wall prior to occupancy permit on Lot 3 14. Per telephone conversations with Julia Skare and Kevin Miller concerning the improvements for Block 4 and 5, the comment is acknowledged. The development of Block 4 and 5 will require testing of existing facilities that have been plugged at left in place to evaluate the extent of the improvements. Sincerely, ~~, , .:,P,L,S. · · JOHN D. ZIMMERMAN P.E.,R.P.S. 908 W. MAIN STREET ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76013 (817) 461-0188 August 15, 1996 City of North Richland Hills 730 1 North East Loop 820 N. Richland Hills, Texas 76182 Planning and Zøning Commission Re: PS 96-29 Culp Addition Block 2, Lot 2R, 3 & 4 Replat I otTer the following response to your letter of comment dated August 7,1996: 1. Signature by owner Signature and Seal by Surveyor to be added to Mylar after approval by Planning and Zøning Commission. 2. Utility Easements revised to 7.5 feet. 3. Sidewalk and utility easement added at Davis/Northeast Parkway. 4. Revised building Setbacks. 5. Added Zoning. 6. Added Dimension from property line to back of curb. 7. The developer is evaluating the location for a common access easement and will be coordinated with Public Works before adding to the Plat. The appropriate location appears to be centered on the north line of Lot 2Rl. Acknowledge requirement to permit drive with TXDOT. 8. Acknowledge sidewalk requirement and sidewalks will be incorporated in construction plans. 9. Topo features removed from Plat. A Topographic drawing is being prepared to show existing improvements. 10. Acknowledge the street light requirement. 11. Acknowledge Fire Hydrant coverage requirement. The requirements will be atTected by the development configuration and will be addressed as the future replatting develops. · KINGSGATE CORP. · · P. O. BOX 190322 DALlAS, TEXAS 75219 July 15, 1996 Mr. Clayton Husband City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 Re: Replat, Culp Addition Haverty Tract Davis Blvd. at Northeast Parkway Dear Clayton I am enclosing 15 copies of the referenced replat together with our check in the amount of $305.00 representing the filing and application fees. We would like to reauest a waiver of your normal drainage study since the purpose of the replat is to make possible the division of ownership of the various tracts. We will of course fully comply with the Drainaqe requirements when we come back with the subdivision plat request for the proposed subdivision for which the Plan Commission recomrnende approva. Please let us know if there are any questions. cf=ours, Vernon S. Smith, Jr. Mobile Phone, Voice Mail 817-925-1796 Office, Fax 214-526-6545 ..~,. .-., -. . ·.~ifL'~m~¡; '-'~'I&~: . "'"'·........"'1 (C'"......~':.....~.~.·. '_'.," ~~.~_~~1t :1'~{:.:..~~~~+~~...:.~~.;~~t~,;~a.;f.;j"!.Jff'I;;,.,...~1~~, ~"il .~. ¡.\.. ..f{~~'tr~7-.1:..~-t:·.~\'L?J. Itr~*'T:·.;:¡'~..1.s.>lJ'¡¡,t' ,. '. ~'"ii,."';,.'~·.~ ~.; '...<-é..:.~,~}·.~1!/:r".t\.'~.'...·SI:'''~..¡y~..~....,.,.-.¡~......".(,.;.'.' '\~'" '~,." .. . __ . . .: .~;.)';: I !(!tt'·: ;':';'}~'!~:i,:~Z1 ." '. "~:-¡~: ,t/' . " ..' 'c' '.~/' "'.. ". ,.' , ~ v ? ... ~ ~ .( . , j" '. j <, g> '21 ':1:-;-'''':'' . , ".' , . ~' ~ . -~ --~ II / '- . ~ " - \.1', .' " "0 \/ (.> t· '\\~:. . ¡ " '~"'O ". '.1,.\ ' . ~ ~'. \.~~ _._-~ '>iT ,", ..,~, ,ws--r, ',', ~~':: ~,\-- , 'I . G ( .;1 . :::í t",\ ~) 'J r::-.. "Q ,,'~' )... ~ .~ G S:. ' ~ -..J ~ C/) ..- ~' :) \. ~ D · ~ ~ ~ g ~ .- - t:J. ~ ~ ~ :«~..4r . . ":;þ /\\ ~1 ' '. ~ "'o" , ' , . /' \' \ , ", '~ '[ - \\'\' ...) \- ~ ~ ~. J cI ~~~~ \ à'\ "~ 't :,~j;žY fI~"" ,.\, .~ ;~! -:::J ._ .,.,.;;-.\- O",OJ\." "q :)" ~.r _ f··:"::'."! ..::- ·,::<,,'''~~,-'~':7:'~' ,......~,~::.\';..'~:~.:.,.:..: ' .....'\ :~. .~:_ , '. ~l~'~' ", '. P. ;;~~(j'~,~,'~~ :,~,,:.;.~::~~..~>.., . , , ", /', :' "",' ..~(".I 1/1'1/;'.0 } , . ".":'.:.."p . .... 1 .. " .- , ~: ~ - 'I) I¿j . . t· Q' '" L. 'J -&" ç,. ;-, " ., . ;,~ I/) ',t: ~ \C- - ~ ;r¡ 'I '~~ J~ ~. J.;' 'Ii) '~~,f'. \. , :~'\ . ~> ~ :". <0 ~. ,- /'1')"- . !")It)CO) .~q~ ';J-It)O~ /'1')/'1'):::" " ~. <1&:~.~ .!..... ...... \ \ , ~ , , ò p o. . 0100 . - 0 g~c) "1"110 . . . <J, ....., Q:; . \ ~ '-' .... .... .' "', '...~:::;~....~(:.~, .~'" - '". . . , ': .""~::,""':::"~'\,'--;: ". ~.. , ..7 ~._'- . . ... " I~ ...., f; \ .' \ \ ~, I VI E Ol.' I ~! I o I - NI~H APPLICATION FOR A REPLAT City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills. Texas 817-581-5500 (Please print or type all responses) Proposed Subdivision Name: cu~p A.OD,'-IO^-l Cu~ntLegaIDescripffon: l-ðT '2 E2: 6 L.D C. lC- 7- Name and Address of Cu~nt Property Owner: H.~\J s.~,.~ ~ ù ~ ^lITU 1'2.~ GD c:t~" 'lJ PEA, c Hi: IS S. ~ T:' Ai \AJ A.T¡,.A..k1 T4. ~ A. '3c:!> 30 <&' Name and Address of Previous Owner:(if purchased during last twelve months) Name and Address of Developer: L¿ I kL <::Ø S ~A.rS C.o e P. "3 t.õ II t\.1 I+A I-L. Cb r. ¡;t:: ~O "2 OA, l.L-4S ,Y- 7'5 "Z./~ Naje and Address of Engineer: D U-N Z. I IV\. M. e: tGlv\ ... ^-J 'It> cg W M.....L ÞJ ~ T Þ.e../.., '-LCá"ÕN T~ 7 ~ð L ~ Type of Development Being Proposed: o SF Residential o Duplex Residential o MF Residential ISl' Commercial/Industrial Application Fee: 1. Application Fee 2. Number of residential lots @ $1.50 per lot: 3. Number of non-residential lots @ $5.00 per acre 4. Number of street intersection signs @ $65.00 each 5. County plat filing fee: TOTAL FEE o Other '20~ J2S~ (Po~ 3::5== Phone No,4z> 4 - ~ 7 t!> . c¡ ~'2. ~ Phone No. "8 11· ~ Z s· I 7C¡ '" Phone No. 1s' t 1 - 4G:o I· 6 I ~ ~ I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the property described above and do hereby submit this Replat to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration. (Attach affidavit with a/l property owner's names when more than one owner involved.) Date: 7! I to / 9 (p Applicant's Phone No . lì·'t"ZS-17CJ '" Print Name: \1 G (ZN ð AJ. SSM I n-l ~ e. Signature: OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number Ps "lø·ZF\ Taxes Paid )<l Liens Paid ~ Assessments Paid 'XI , REPLAT CD - 403 (2196) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 9/9/96 Subject: Request for Extension of Permit for Use of Green Valley Race Track Agenda Number: GN 96-110 Texas Instruments received a one year extension on their permit to use Green Valley Race Track for their testing in February, 1996. The attached letter is a request for extension through December, 1997. There will be no change in the operation or improvements. They will continue to test as they are at the present time. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council grant the above request. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ . Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM ~ ÞcJ~~ Fln8l1ce Director Page 1 of Texas Instruments Incorporated · .. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS Post Office Box 655303, MS 8375 Dallas, Texas 75265 8330 lBJ Freeway, MS 8375 Dallas, Texas 75243 Xl August 1996 (214) 997-5663 Fax In Reply Refer to Ouon No. 22433 Mr. C.A. Sanford Deputy Cty Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 SUBJECT USE OF THE GREEN V ALLEY RACE TRACK BY TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED Dear Mr. Sanford: · Please allow this letter to serve as a formal request from Texas Instruments Incorporated (TI) to the North Richland Hills City Manager's office, the Mayor, and the City Council for approval of TI's extended and continued use of the Green Valley Race Track property from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 1997. Please be advised that our use and improvements in place will remain unchanged through the extended period. H more information or any action from TI is required to support an affirmative response to this request, please don't hesitate to call me at (214) 997-5368. Please notify me when a decision has been reached. Your review and consideration of this request is appreciated. Sincerely, a2v¿:;:: ~ Arthur L. Lowe Manager, Major Real Estate Leasing AU1p · cc: Bill Hielscher Tl-1:J268 TI-"", CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: Subject: Approval of 1996 Certified Tax Roll - Resolution 96-58 Agenda Number: 9/09/95 GN 96-111 Tarrant Appraisal District has provided the City with Certified Tax Roll information. This includes the most current appraisal information, exemptions for disabled veterans, persons over 65, homestead and disabled persons, abatement value losses, and agricultural value losses. These values also include the new construction and the minimum value still under protest to the Tarrant Appraisal Review Board. The certified values for our City are $1,752,991,454. This is the amount that is recommended to be certified and accepted by the City Council. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve Resolution 96-58 to approve the Certified Tax Roll in the amount of $1 ,752,991 ,454 for 1996. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Oth Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Dwector Page 1 of . . . RESOLUTION NO. 96-58 WHEREAS, the City Council of this City received the Ad Valorem Tax Rolls for the year 1996 from Tarrant Appraisal District in the amount of net taxable value of $1,752,991,454 including minimum value of properties pending disposition before the Appraisal Review Board; and WHEREAS, the City Council studied said Tax Rolls and approved same on September 9, 1996. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas that: 1. The approval of said Tax Rolls received from Tarrant Appraisal District in September, 1996, be and is hereby ratified and said Tax Rolls shall collectively be considered the Tax Roll of this City for 1996 and it is hereby in all things adopted and approved. PASSED AND APPROVED the 9th day of September, 1996. ATTEST: Tommy Brown - Mayor Patricia Hutson - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I' Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 9/09/96 GN 96-112 Subject: Authorizing Homestead, Over 65, and Disability Exemptions Agenda Number: from Ad Valorem Taxes - Ordinance No. 2139 For the past several years the City Council has been granting several exemptions from Ad Valorem Taxes, and it is necessary for Council to again take action adopting exemptions. The ordinance that is being proposed includes a 15% exemption for residential homestead, a maximum $29,000 exemption from assessed value on a residential homestead for persons over the age of 65, and a $29,000 exemption from assessed value of property owned by a disabled person where that property is exclusively used for homestead purposes. The proposed ordinance does not allow an exemption to be claimed for both the over 65 and the disability, and no homestead will be subject to both the over 65 and disability exemption. These exemptions were anticipated in calculating the net taxable property that is included in the Certified Tax Rolls and calculating the effective tax rate for 1996. Recommendation: It is recommended that Ordinance No. 2139 providing for exemptions for homestead, over 65 years of age, and disability persons be approved. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other _. ' ~ãep~ture CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finane:. Director Page 1 of . ORDINANCE NO. 2139 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING RESIDENTIAL HOMESTEAD, OVER 65, AND DISABILITY EXEMPTIONS FROM AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE 1996 TAX YEAR. WHEREAS, the City Council determined the necessity for a residential homestead exemption and an over 65 exemption; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the special needs of disabled persons; NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: 1. . There shall be exempt from the City Ad Valorem Taxes for the year 1996, fifteen percent (15%) (with a minimum of $5,000) of the assessed value of residential homestead within the City which is occupied by the owner as his homestead. 2. Persons over the age of 65 years, claiming an exemption pursuant to Ordinance No. 676 shall have a $29,000.00 exemption from the assessed value of a residential homestead. A person who is disabled within the meaning of Section 11.13 (m) of the Property Tax Code of the State of Texas, as of January 1 st of each year shall be entitled to $29,000.00 exemption from the assessed value of property owned by such disabled persons and used exclusively for homestead purposes by such disabled persons. No person may claim both the "over 65" exemption and the "disability" exemption and no homestead shall be subjected to both the "over 65" exemption and the "disability" exemption. 3. Persons claiming the exemptions must comply with the City Ordinances and Texas Property Tax Code. . r . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2139 Page Two 4. "Exemptions provided for in section 1 and 2 will remain in force by the City of North Richland Hills unless the City Council of North Richland Hills takes action to change either, or both." PASSED AND APPROVED this 9th day of September, 1996. Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 9/09/96 GN 96-113 Subject: Adopting the Tax Rate for 1996 - Ordinance No. 2140 Agenda Number: The City Council held the hearing on the proposed 1996-97 tax rate at its August 26, 1996 City Council meeting. Since the proposed tax rate of 57¢ is more than 3% above the effective tax rate for 1996 it was necessary to publish notice for and conduct a special hearing on the tax rate, which was held August 26, and to also provide a second publication informing the public of the date on which the Council would actually set the tax rate. These publications have been made to the Fort Worth Star Telegram in accordance with State Law. The proposed tax rate of 57¢ is broken down into two parts as follows: .29618¢ .27382¢ is for purposes of maintenance and operation is for payment of interest and principal on debt of the City No additional hearing is required for the tax rate for fiscal year 1996-97. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council adopt Ordinance No. 2140 setting the tax rate for the 1996 tax year at 57¢. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget _ ~!I/¡.- - \J~"UQ:pa~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director Page 1 of ~ . ORDINANCE NO. 2140 AN ORDINANCE LEVYING A TAX RATE FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS FOR THE 1996 TAX YEAR BE IT ORDAINED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS THAT: We, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills do hereby levy or adopt the tax rate on $100 valuation for this City for tax year 1996 as follows: $.29618 for the purposes of maintenance and operation. $.27382 for the payment of principal and interest on debt of this City. $.57000 total tax rate. . The tax assessor-collector is hereby authorized to assess and collect the taxes of the City of North Richland Hills on this 9th day of September, 1996. 1. That there is hereby levied and shall be collected as provided by law, an Ad Valorem tax for the year 1996 on all property, real and personal, except such property as may be exempt from taxation by Constitutions in the statutes of the State of Texas, and ordinances and resolutions of the City of North Richland Hills, situated within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, on January 1, 1996, and that the amount to be applied to the value of such property shall be 57.0¢ per $100 valuation. 2. That the tax so levied and assessed shall be apportioned to the accounts and funds in the amount as set forth above. The amounts collected for payment of principal and interest on debt of the City shall be deposited into an interest and sinking fund for that purpose until a total of $4,800,000 is deposited from the 1996 Ad Valorem tax levy. . . ORDINANCE NO. 2140 Page Two 3. That the taxes provided for herein are in accordance with the appropriate State statues. 4. Ad Valorem taxes levied by this Ordinance shall be due and payable on October 1, 1996, and shall become delinquent on the first day of February, 1997. Payment of such tax is due as provided by the Texas Property Tax Code. 5. If the tax is unpaid after February 1, 1997, such tax will become delinquent and penalty and interest will attach and accrue as provided by the Statutes of the Texas Property Tax Code Sec. 33.01. . 6. In the event the taxes become delinquent and in the event such delinquent taxes are referred to an attorney for collection, an additional amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the total amount of tax, penalty and interest then due shall be added as collection costs to be paid by the taxpayer. 7. Taxes herein levied and uncollected shall be a first prior and superior lien against the property, and the said lien shall be superior liens charges, and encumbrances, and such lien shall attach to personal property with the same priority as to real property. 8. The lien provided herein shall be attached as of January 1, 1996. 9. . Should any section, provision or clause of the Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so declared to be invalid. · ORDINANCE NO. 2140 Page Three 10. The Ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its approval and adoption as provided by law. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, upon first and final reading, at a regular meeting on the 9th day of September, 1996. Tommy Brown - Mayor · ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for City · / r CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 9/09/96 GN 96-114 Subject: Adopting the 1996-97 Budget - Ordinance No. 2141 Agenda Number: The proposed budget for 1996-97 was filed with the City Secretary's office on August 16, 1996. All necessary publications and hearings have been completed in compliance with City Charter requirements and State Law. The 1996-97 General Fund budget is based on the 57¢ tax rate which is the existing rate for the current fiscal year. The Aquatic Park budget for 1996-97 includes the proposed rate increases for season passes as discussed previously with City Council. Revisions to the 1995-96 revenues and expenditures have been made to reflect the most current estimates for this year. The Budgeted expenditures are: Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other _ ~~dS;gnatu<e CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Fund General Fund General Debt Service Utility Enterprise Fund Aquatic Park Enterprise Fund Support Services Fund Self-Insurance Fund Information Services Fund Park and Recreation Facilities Development Fund Crime Control & Prevention District Promotional Fund Donations Fund Special Investigation Fund Drainage Utility Fund Golf Course Fund General Street Capital Projects Revised Budget 1995-96 $19,413,603 5,320,025 18,557,253 2,615,654 3,017,536 3,125,202 1,453,042 Proposed Budget 1996-97 $20,838,764 5,886,622 15,794,087 2,252,090 2,970,983 3,355,007 1,556,874 3,442,946 794,236 258,625 93,300 477,680 626,724 1,984,236 5,069,207 3,733,727 3,306,000 284,094 76,500 45,990 556,828 2,294,304 8,671,218 Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director Page 1 of . General Drainage Capital Projects Permanent Street Maintenance Fund Permanent Capital Maintenance Projects Public Safety Capital Projects Major Capital Equipment Program Utility Capital Projects Park Capital Projects General CIP Personnel Utility CIP Personnel Utility Construction Personnel 5,030,600 349,450 o 1,675,000 o 1,011,800 4,785,286 182,409 122,905 551,336 477,500 350,000 179,886 o 2,346,638 1,525,000 2,080,875 192,695 135,875 598,018 The North Richland Hills Crime Control and Prevention District Board of Directors conducted a budget work session on August 4, 1996 to review the 1995/96 Revised Budget and the Proposed 1996/97 Budget. As required by law, a public hearing was conducted on August 26, 1996. The Revised 1995/96 Budget and the Proposed 1996/97 Budget was approved by the Board on that date. The Board further recommended that City Council approve and adopt both the revised and proposed budgets. . The Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation Board of Directors reviewed the Revised 1995/96 Budget and the Proposed 1996/97 Budget. The Board conducted a public hearing on the budget on August 26, 1996. On that date, the Board approved both the 1995/96 Revised Budget and the 1996/97 Proposed Budget. The Board further recommended City Council approve and adopt both budgets. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 2141 adopting the 1996-97 Budget (which includes the Crime Control and Prevention District Budget and the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation Budget), the revisions to the 1995-96 Budget, and the rate increases for season passes at the Aquatic Park. . . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2141 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97; APPROVING REVISED BUDGET FIGURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96; PROVIDING FOR NECESSARY TRANSFERS OF FUNDS BETWEEN ACCOUNTS AND DEPARTMENTS, IF REQUIRED; APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE 1996/97 FISCAL YEAR FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared certain figures as a 1996/97 budget and has submitted the same to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Manager on September 1, 1996 filed such proposed budget with the City Secretary for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1996; and WHEREAS, the City Secretary did post notice that such proposed budget has been filed and a public hearing called thereon by the City Council in City Hall; and WHEREAS, the City Council determined such proposed budget for fiscal year 1996/97 to be appropriate and correct in all respects and that all requirements of the law have been satisfied; NOW THEREFORE: BE ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS: SECTION 1. THAT the budget proposed by the City Manager for the fiscal year October 1,1995 through September 30,1997, BE and the same is hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 2. THAT the figures prepared and submitted by the City Manager for 1996/97 fiscal year BE and the same is hereby approved in all respects. SECTION 3. THAT any necessary transfer of funds between accounts, departments, or programs by the City Manager for City purposes or as a result of unusual or unforeseen conditions during the administration of the 1996/97 fiscal year budget BE and are hereby authorized and approved. SECTION 4. THAT amounts set under the headings "Revised 1995-96" BE and are hereby authorized and approved. SECTION 5. THAT the several amounts, as set forth in the proposed 1995/96 fiscal year budget BE and are hereby authorized to the objects and purposes named, subject to notification in accordance with SECTION 3 hereof if necessary. . ORDINANCE NO. 2141 Page 2 SECTION 6. THAT a copy of the 1996/97 fiscal year budget will be filed with the appropriate officials as required by law. SECTION 7. THAT any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word be declared unconstitutional and invalid for any reason, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. PASSED by the City Council on the first reading this 9th day of September, 1996 Tommy Brown, Mayor . ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Larry J. Cunningham, Assistant City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: . Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 9/9/96 Subject: Emplovee Compensation System Policies and Procedures - Resolution 96-59 Agenda Number: GN 96-115 Over the past six months, the City Council and City Staff have worked together to develop a plan to refine the current employee compensation system. The attached Employee Compensation System Policies and Procedures is the culmination of these efforts. The philosophy of the new system is to enhance the City's ability to attract and retain outstanding employees by providing market driven compensation in a workplace that treats individuals in a fair and equitable manner. These policies and procedures provide the administrative framework by which the system will operate. As previously stated, adoption of this system in no way removes any approval authority from the City Council. The attached resolution would adopt the policies and procedures. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council approve resolution 96-59. e Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget - C11~..,. A,µ _Other _ ~:/~ _' l.hl~ ~D£'~~ Ci -:':901 CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM FI"."ce Director Page 1 of · e e RESOLUTION NO. 96-59 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills recognizes that one of the City's greatest assets is the employees who make it their career to serve the citizens of North Richland Hills; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that all employees should be treated in a fair and equitable manner regardless of position; and WHEREAS, the City Council endeavors to compensate City employees at a market competitive level in order to retain and attract quality individuals; NOW, THEREFORE: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, THAT the attached employee compensation system policies and procedures is hereby adopted. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this the 9th day of September, 1996. APPROVED: ATTEST: Tommy Brown, Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City e e e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SYSTEM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES - Compensation System Philo$ophy - It is the philosophy of the City of North Richland Hills to maintain a compensation system which provides salaries comparable to positions of the same type and level of responsibility in the job market, to provide internal and external equity, and to create an incentive for employees to perform at their greatest potential. 1. Merit Pay Philosophy To meet the objectives of fairness, equity, and quality of performance incentives, the pay system for North Richland Hills employees is merit based. The merit pay system incorporates the philosophy that performance and productivity are important to the organization and that an employee should be rewarded based on performance. The foundation of this system is an effective performance evaluation system that clearly defines and communicates job duties to be performed, the level of performance expected, and provides an opportunity for ongoing feedback as results are achieved or development is needed. 2. Structure of Ranges The pay plan structure consists of a series of pay grades for each position, with a minimum and maximum rate. Separate pay plans are established for general municipal employees (civil service and appointed [exempt)), and public safety employees. 3. Progression Through Ranges A. General Municipal Employees Group 1. Civil Service (CS) Employees Pay grades CS - 1 through CS-20 are Civil Service positions and include 4% annual merit adjustments, which are permitted if acceptable performance evaluations are received. Ranges CS-1 through CS-15 are designed to allow 2% merit increases at 6 month intervals for the first two years to recognize and reward performance as the learning curve is shorter for these positions. After the two years, annual steps of one year are provided for progression throughout the ranges to the maximum. · Promotions from one pay grade to another allow the individual to move to either the base pay of the new range or to the nearest step for the employee to receive at least a 5% increase in pay. If the promotion is to a grade with an open range, the employee can move to base pay of the new range or 5%, whichever is greater. The employee will then progress through the new range according to the new anniversary date of his or her promotion. 2. Appointed Staff (Exempt or [AS)) Employees Pay grades AS-1 through AS-19 include professional, management, and other positions. These provide open ranges, with an opportunity for 4% merit increase, depending upon acceptable performance evaluations. Exceptional ratings could warrant additional merit increase above 4% with documented justification, and with recommendation of department head, and approval of the City Manager. Promotions from one pay grade to another will be to the base of the new position or 5%, whichever is greater. Promotions provide new anniversary dates, and future merit increases will be considered on the employee's new anniversary date. B. Public Safety (PS) Employees e This includes positions in the public safety classifications. PS-1 through PS-5. Positions PS 1-4 are placed in the system according to time in grade. PS-1 steps are annual for first four years, thereafter steps are every two years. PS-2 through PS-4 positions have a two year step after base, and are thereafter annually. The PS-5 classification will be an open range, with annual 4% raises. Annual step increases for all positions are merit based and therefore subject to acceptable performance evaluations. Skipping of a step at any rank in the proposed pay plan is not permitted, except through promotion. Upon promotion of any person to a higher rank, the individual would progress to the base step of the newly promoted classification if that base represents a salary increase. Should a person at the top step of a pay range be promoted to a position where the base is not an increase, then the individual will be placed at the next step that constitutes a pay increase. In such a case, the person will remain in the step until time in grade requirements have been satisfied. For example, a PS-2, step F/6 employee promoted to PS-3 would start at the next higher step in that range, or PS-3, step C/2. The employee would then stay at that step for 3 years before being eligible for a merit step increase, thereby meeting time in grade requirements. 4. Unacceptable Performance An employee receiving an evaluation of below "average" or below e 2 . . e . 6. "acceptable" (depending on the evaluation system in place at any given time in the future), will not be eligible for a merit increase to the next step in the pay system until the employee has received ratings of "average" or "acceptable" in two subsequent, consecutive evaluations. At that time the employee will then go to the next step or amount of increase that he or she would have received when the merit raise was withheld. No double steps or compensation in excess of the normal merit raise will be authorized to "make up" the lost time and raise. 5. Part-time Positions No part-time positions are included in this pay system. Maintenance of Merit Pay System The City of North Richland Hills recognizes the importance of maintaining competitive salary structures for all positions. Therefore, annually the City will maintain the pay system through salary surveys, analysis of labor market conditions, and a review of other intemaVextemal market factors. Such survey and evaluations will be done in the fall of each year with any adjustments made in January. City management will provide recommended pay range adjustments for Council consideration on an annual basis for budget consideration. Any approved pay range modifications will adjust both ranges and steps within ranges and salary adjustments made in January of each year if provided for in the budget. As necessary, the City Manager shall have authority to make adjustments to maintain the system in a manner consistent with the compensation system policies and procedures. The first evaluation/maintenance of the General Municipal Employee's classifications will be in January, 1997. The first evaluation/maintenance of the Public Safety Employee's classifications were made in conjunction with the development of the system and will be implemented on October 1, 1996. Both classifications will be evaluated/maintained for a second time in January, 1998, and each January thereafter. 3 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CRIME CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD .epartment: Support Services Council Meeting Date: 9/09/96 Subject: Emission Analyzer Upgrade Agenda Number: GN 96-116 The Texas Motorist's Choice Emission Testing Program was implemented by the State of Texas on July 1, 1996. Phase I of the program required the Allen emission testing analyzer used by Equipment Services to be connected to the State Vehicle Information Database. Phase II of the program requires Allen Manufacturing to upgrade all emission analyzers with new computer hardware, software, and additional testing capabilities. Phase II of the program is scheduled to start October 1, 1996. The cost of the upgrade from Allen Manufacturing is $5,445 which includes one year warranty. Without the upgrade we will be unable to perform the required yearly emission testing or conduct performance testing during normal maintenance. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the emission analyzer upgrade to Allen Manufacturing for $5,445. . Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/R v.) .iPerating Bu et_ ..ther _ Acct. Number 06-01-03-6600 Sufficient Funds ~vailable ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM Fin..,,,,, O..ctor Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Manager Council Meeting Date: 9/09/96 Subject: Appointments to the Local History Steering Committee Agenda Number: GN 96-117 At the July 8, 1996 Council meeting the City Council approved Ordinance No. 2134 organizing the Local History Steering Committee. The following individuals have expressed interest in being appointed to the committee: Polly Brinkley Avis Crisp Naomi Cummings Nancy Dowler Jane Dunkelberg Mary Ellis Mildred Freeman Evalyn Lochridge Oscar Lochridge Hazel Lowrance Cheryl Lyman LaDonna Moore Ace Nace Patsy Nix Gerry Orr Dorthy Parker Aline Parker Mike Patterson Deloris Pultz Pat Riddle Mary Shilcutt Billie Sommermeyer Don Tipps Councilwoman Johnson has met with this group and recommends including all of them on the committee. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council take action on the proposed appointments. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Oth Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ ~t:u¿£ C4.-~d ignature . ----"~~ ¥ CITY COUNCIL ACTIONTll?: - . -- Page 1 of CITY OF ~ NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Department: Finance I Parks and Recreation Council Meeting Date: 9/9/96 Subject: Authorize Purchase of Treadmill Agenda Number: PU 96-65 As part of the 1995/96 revised budget, Council allocated funds for the replacement of outdated fitness equipment. Staff would like to replace the equipment with two Star Trac treadmills. At the July 8, 1996 meeting Council awarded the bid for a Star Trac treadmill in the amount of$3,800 (PU 96-56). Star Trac has offered to hold the bid price for the purchase of two additional treadmills. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council authorize the purchase of two treadmills from Star Trac in the amount of $7,600. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget L Other It IIØc ~~iÆ ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM Acct. Number 01-75-20-6400 Sufficient Funds Available Finance Dir.C1or Page 1 of ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Police Council Meeting Date: 9/9/96 Agenda Number: PU 96-66 Subject: Award Bid for Motorcycles As part of the Crime Control District budget, Council appropriated funds for the purchase of two motorcycles. As the result of the accident on July 19, 1996 an additional motorcycle will be needed for replacement. Formal bids were solicited for three motorcycles and the results are outlined below. Kawasaki City $····'·2"'·,6·..·'·····2···'8..'..5·,.. . . . . . . . ,", ',' ... . .. .. . . . ;..~w"'....:'~·.,·"'.·"'.....· Kawasaki of Fort Worth $29,659 Kawasaki City met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and can deliver the motorcycles in 90 days. Fundina Source: 28-80-04-6600 $26,285 Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for three motorcycles to Kawasaki City in the amount of $26,285. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ o Finance Review Acct. Number See Above Sufficient Funds Available Anance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Approve CIty-Developer Agreement concerning Subject: Hightower Drive Paving Participation, Stonybrooke Addition Council Meeting Date: 9/09/96 Agenda Number: PW 96-47 The developer, Wayne and Betty Waters, has requested the City participate in the cost of the extra width of Hightower Drive pavement in excess of a standard 37 -foot street. This section of Hightower Drive is adjacent to Lots 26-29, Block 15, Stonybrooke Addition and located across the street from the Stoney Ridge Addition. This portion of roadway will be constructed with 8" of asphalt on 8" of subgrade as approved by Council on 8/26/96, PW 96-46 The estimate of City participation based on Austin Bridge & Road bid prices seems reasonable at $5,049.34. Funding Source: Sufficient funds of $6,000 are available in the Unspecified Street Fund. Recommendation: It is recommended Council approve the City-Developer Agreement with Wayne and Betty Waters concerning Hightower Drive Paving Improvements, authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement, and appropriate a total of $6,000 from the Unspecified Street Fund. Finance Review 13-23-29-6000 Available Finance Direct", " ment Head SI nature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of . . . CITY-DEVELOPER AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § KNOW ALL MEN BE THESE PRESENTS WHEREAS, Wayne and Betty Waters, hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, a municipal corporation operating under a Home Rule Charter, hereinafter referred to as "City" desire to enter into a contract for pavement improvements along a segment of Hightower Drive. In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and for the purpose of providing pavement improvements for Hightower Drive as indicated in the construction plans titled "LOTS 26 TIiRU 29 STONYBROOKE ADDITION" the Developer and the City hereto agree: 1. The Developer will pay to the City all necessary processing fees and will furnish all necessary permits, as required from the construction of the above referenced facilities. In addition, the Developer has delivered construction plans, and will deliver all other necessary contract documents prepared by a registered professional engineer, and will also furnish construction surveying, cut sheets and field adjustments. 2. The Developer will enter into a contract with the Contractor who wiIl perform the work and who will be paid by the Developer as specified in the construction contract documents. Monthly pay estimates concerning Hightower Drive shall be subject to the City's review. 3. The Developer agrees to provide, at no cost to the City, all testing necessary to insure that the construction is in accordance with the project specifications and the City standards. 4. The Developer understands and agrees that he has no authority to cancel, alter or amend the terms of the construction contract with reference to Hightower Drive without specific written authority of the City, and that he shall be responsible for paying the costs of any canceIlations, additions, alterations, or amendments to the contract unless specificaIly provided otherwise by written authorization from the City. 5. The Contractor will provide to the City on City forms a maintenance bond in the amount of twenty (20%) percent of the contract price less the City's participation of the costs. It is herein expressly written that the Developer shaIl require the Contractor to maintain all improvements regardless of the face value of the bond. 6. The City agrees to participate in the cost of the faciliHes after construction is complete and accepted. The description and amount of participation is as foIlows: In accordance with Section 345 of Ordinance No. 1982, Subdivision Regulations, the City will reimburse the Developer the eligible amount for street improvements on Hightower Drive. The City shaIl only reimburse the Developer the amount agreed upon below, after the construction of the improvements is complete and accepted by the City. 7. The City will inspect the work as required and upon satisfactory completion of the work, the City will accept ownership and maintenance of the street subject to the terms of the maintenance bond. 234001.AGR . . . 8. The Developer further covenants and agrees to, and by these presents does hereby, fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents and employees from all suits, actions, or claims of any character, whether real or asserted, brought for or Qn account of any injuries or damages sustained by any persons (including death), or to any property,-resulting from or in connection with the construction, design, performance, or completion or any work to be performed by said Developer, his contractor, subcontractors, officers, agents, or employees, or in consequence of any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect, or misconduct of said Developer, his contractor, subcontractors, officer, agents, or employees, whether or not such injuries, death or damages are caused, in whore or in part, by the alleged negligence of the City of North Richland Hills, its officer, agents, servants, employees, contractors, or subcontractors. 9. Upon completion of the work, good and sufficient title to all facilities constructed warranted free of any liens or encumbrances is hereby vested in the City of North Richland Hills. 10. Special provisions: None Executed this the ~~ day of ~ (......-r. 1996. 0- By: ¿11/f-VI>í¿{" ~~ -4y!¡e Waters By: ~J q, )/,ah-AÄ etty ters STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TARRANT § This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the c:<c,. 1996, by Wa and Bet Waters. Commission Expires: &, -/0 -9F? ATTEST: City Secretary, Patricia Hutson APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City "'''tl\'', ''-'_0 day of a~+ otary Public, State of Texas -r. c-. J-I ¡,/ 5 5-3 Notary's Printed Name: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: Mayor, Tommy Brown . . . CITY PARTICIPATION STONYBROOKE ADDITION (OVER - SIZING) Item City Quantity City Participation Developer Cost 2" Type "B" HMAC (Subbase) 214 SY 860.28 2,653.20 4" Type "B" HMAC (Base) 214 SY 1,572.90 4,057.20 2" Type "D" HMAC 214 SY 843.16 2,174.88 8" Stabilized Subgrade 214 SY 428.00 1,352.00 Lime (40# /SY) 4.5 Ton 328.50 985.50 Excavation 107 CY 1,016.50 2,850.00 Curb & Gutter 320 LF 0.00 4,208.00 TOTAL MAXIMUM PARTICIPATION 5,049.34 18,280.78 234OO1.AGR . . ~z ., g; '- '> (-f >..... d L Q.) > o V .:::£ () :0 ~ ..-0 >-- r .... o o c- o :fQ v<G) U \:i 6) <t:._ C I cpc ._ V) ~ ">--.. '7 ~~ \J~~~ W C UJ c , -t-.- -f? d ""7 .f"I >:(f\ ~ gJ - C! Q ß ~ r::. :t " ....... ~ IO~ ClJ >- 0) ~-o ç .- -#~ ú) ~[L -o"'e LlJt<) ~\T) ~ c. () .- '4-= > ó[1