Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1996-11-25 Agendas CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA NOVEMBEfU'1, 1996 - 6:00 P.M. f)'5 · For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Pre-Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. · NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Accessory Buildings in Excess of 200 Square Feet (5 Minutes) 2. Enforcement of Code Violations (10 Minutes) 3. Request of Billy Graham for Development Help (10 Minutes) 4. IR 96-125 Group Day-care Homes (5 Minutes) 5. IR 96-122 Wood crest Addition Homeowners Request (10 Minutes) 6. GN 96-143 Lone Star Gas Company Gate Rate Case - Resolution No. 96-71 (Agenda Item #19) (5 Minutes) 7. PU 96-95 Authorize Purchase of Disk Drives from the City of Richardson (Agenda Item #28) (5 Minutes) 18 I Other Items I I · tit . . Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. *Executive Session (25 Minutes) - The Council may enter into closed executive session to discuss the following: A. Consultation with Attorney Under Gov. Code §551.071 1) Legal Matters Concerning Zoning and Platting 2) Legal Interpretation of Land Use 3) Interpretation of Court Order in Cause No. 142-120172-89 10. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. postED jjI0~Jq~ ~el /IJ·){) ~ Time By ~~~~. e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA NOVEMBER 25, 1996 For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items marked with an * are on the consent agenda and will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 581-5502 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Minutes of the Pre-Council Meeting November 11, 1996 5. Minutes of the Regular Meeting November 11, 1996 6. Presentations by Boards & Commissions e Page 2 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 8. Consent Agenda Item(s) Indicated by Asterisk (15, 17, 18, 19,20,21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, & 31) 9. PZ 96-25 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of North Park Baptist Church to Rezone Lot 1, Block A, North Park Church Addition, from R- 3 Single Family Residential to U Institutional. (Located at 7025 Mid Cities Boulevard) Ordinance No. 2156 10. PZ 96-26 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Marvin D. Smith to Rezone Tract CC. and a portion of Tract 2, Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from AG Agriculture to R-1 Single Family Residential. (Located in the 7600 Block of Douglas Lane) - Ordinance No. 2157 11. PZ 96-27 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Daniel G. Ham to Rezone Tract 2C6, Peck Survey, Abstract 1210; and portion of Lot 1, Block 1, McKee Addition, From AG Agriculture to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential. (Located at 7612 Shady Grove Road) Ordinance No. 2158 . e r Page 3 e NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 12. PZ 96-28 Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Spain Properties to Rezone Block 11, Snow Heights North Addition, from R-7-MF Multi Family Residential to a Planned Development for Multi Family Residential. (Located at the Northeast Corner of Lewis Drive and Kilmer Drive) Ordinance No. 2159 13. PS 96-30 Request of Daniel G. Ham for Short Form Final Plat of Lot 1 R1, Block 1, McKee Addition. (Located at 7612 Shady Grove Road) DENIED 10/28/96 14. PS 96-31 Request of Linda Owen for Replat of Lot 1 R, Block 33, College Hill Addition. (Located in the 6100 Block of Davis Blvd.) *15. GN 96-135 Consider Establishing Pool Wastewater Discharge and Lot Grading Regulations for Swimming Pools. TABLED 11/11/96 - Ordinance No. 2154 16. GN 96-140 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant - Public Hearing *17. GN 96-141 Consider Bid Award for Demolition of Structure at 3533 Sheridon Drive . - Page 5 - NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *27. PU 96-94 Purchase of Lot 1 B, Block 2, Walker Branch Addition for Girls Softball Complex *28. PU 96-95 Authorize Purchase of Disk Drives from the City of Richardson *29. PAY 96-13 Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 21 in the Amount of $46,255.17 to J. L. Bertram Construction & Engineering, Inc. For Strummer Drive Paving and Drainage Improvements *30. PAY 96-14 Authorize Payment to EBSCO for Subscription Renewal for the Library *31. PAY 96-15 Authorize Payment to Information Access Company 32. Citizens Presentation 33. Adjournment . By ~ II q¡p, / Date /O:/D t'l¥L Time OMJPqfh~ if{. .- e Page 4 e NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *18. GN 96-142 Canceling the December Regular Council Meetings and Calling a Special December Council Meeting *19. GN 96-143 Lone Star Gas Company Gate Rate Case - Resolution No. 96-71 *20. GN 96-144 Participation in the Coalition for Community and Economic Development - Resolution No. 96-72 *21. GN 96-145 Appointment of Records Management Officer - Ordinance No. 2160 *22. PU 96-89 Award Contract for Collection of Delinquent EMS and Utility Bills *23. PU 96-90 Award Bid for Annual Contract to Supply Janitorial Paper Products *24. PU 96-91 Award Bid for Fire Department Duty Uniforms *25. PU 96-92 Authorize Purchase of Novell Network Operating System from DIR *26. PU 96-93 Beverage Vendor Request for Proposal - Coca-Cola Bottling Company of North Texas . e e e e INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 96-122 !\ ~ Date: V Subject: November 18, 1996 Woodcrest Addition Homeowners Request The Woodcrest Subdivision consists of Wedgeview, Weyland and Wondel Court. These streets run north and south, basically, and are located between Bedford Road and Airport Freeway. Their eastern boundary is the City of Hurst and their western boundary is the strip center that contains Furr's Cafeteria. In the summer of 1993 there was a public meeting held by the Highway Department at the Brookside Center in Hurst. At that time, there were three different possibilities shown for the widening of Airport Freeway. Each of these suggested designs intruded into this neighborhood. The degree of intrusion varied with each design. The expansion would require the removal of several homes. At that meeting the people were told that within twelve to sixteen months there was expected to be another public hearing. The Homeowners Association met with the Highway Department and suggested to them a fourth possible design which would lower the access road to the level of the freeway and would cul-de-sac Wedgeview and Weyland and all streets that now open onto the access road. The Homeowners Association recently had another meeting where a representative from TXDOT was asked to attend. Randy Burkett came and made a presentation to their group. He explained the reason there has not been a public meeting. When they were promised the next meeting would occur in 14 to 16 months, right after that time the Federal Government put in two new regulations having to do with single occupancy vehicles and something else. The final information on those studies is going to be available this January, so the first time a public hearing can be held would be 14 to 16 months after that time. Mr. Jim Ratts, representing the Homeowners Association, called and made a request that our Council join with other Councils along the Loop 820 corridor and force the Highway Department to do a design immediately. I talked with him at length and explained to him the process. He still felt that we would have the power to influence the Highway Department to speed up their design process. He suggested that the planning process be done in segments so they could have their information right away. I did tell him that if it was done in segments we would probably ask for the segment that included Rufe Snow before we would that segment by the interchange. He felt that the homeowners had been put in a very awkward position, and I agree with him. Those homeowners who have the possibility of having their houses removed would have to divulge that information to any possible buyer of their house. What they are requesting, in asking for this early design, is that they be allowed to know what is going to happen in their neighborhood. They feel a sense of being ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS e e e Page Two unsettled. There is a good possibility that one or more of this Homeowners' Association will be here at one of your next meetings to make this request. I will be happy to answer any questions that you have in this regard. Respectfully submitted, CA- C.A. Sanford City Manager CAS/gp INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 96-125 Date: November 25, 1996 Subject: Group Day-care Homes The Environmental Services Department currently provides health inspections for six (6) Group Day-Care Homes in North Richland Hills at no cost to the operators. It has come to our attention that the Zoning Ordinance does not have a specific provision for this type of business. The Texas Human Resources Code, Chapter 42.002 defines a Group Day-Care Home as a facility that provides care for 7 to 12 children under 14 years of age for less than 24 hours a day. In addition, Chapter 42.041 requires that each Group Day-Care Home be registered with the state and Chapter 42.023 requires that each have an annual health and fire inspection. The Environmental Services Department will vvork with the Planning and Inspections Department to propose a change to the Zoning Ordinance that will permit these facilities to continue to operate in North Richland Hills. An amendment to Ordinance #1617, which regulates Child Care Facilities, will be proposed to allow for the assessment of a health inspection fee of $75.00 which is one half of the fee charged for Licensed Child Care Facilities in North Richland Hills. There is currently a fee assessed for the fire inspection of $35.00. It is our intention to allow for the operation of Group Day-Care Homes in North Richland Hills that are registered with the State and that operate in compliance with all City ordinances as well as State regulations. Respectsully Submitted: -CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS l e Present: e Absent: MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS HELD IN THE PRE-COUNCIL ROOM AT CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - NOVEMBER 11,1996 - 6:30 P.M. Tommy Brown Mack Garvin Lyle E. Welch Jo Ann Johnson Don Phifer Byron Sibbet C.A. Sanford Randy Shiflet Larry Cunningham Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Greg Dickens Jackie Theriot Steve Brown Barry LeBaron Terry Kinzie Richard Albin Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Coûncilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney Public Works Director Acting Finance Director Library Director Planningllnspection Director Information Services Director City Engineer Mark Wood Linda Spurlock Sansoucie Councilman Councilwoman ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT DISCUSSION OF Staff advised that the City of Hurst was doing GREG D. LOREAN BRANCH drainage improvements downstream through DRAINAGE AREA their soccer complex. Hurst has requested that North Richland Hills take them into consideration as the property on the west side of Precinct Line Road develops. They would like for each undeveloped property owner to retain any additional drainage on the property so that there would not be any additional flow of water under Precinct Line Road. There was considerable discussion by the Council regarding the drainage around Precinct Line Road. Consensus of the Council was for the Public Works Director to consider the drainage problem and bring back a recommendation to the Council. HISTORICAL Mayor Brown postponed discussion of this COMMITTEE item to a later date. I ru:yut:.ð I I I e Pre-Council Minutes November 11, 1996 Page 2 e e ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT DISCUSSION OF The City Manager advised he had received C.A. PARK'S SPECIAL from the Legislature an Interim Report on SALES TAX Economic Development Incentives. Mr. Sanford advised some of the items discussed in the report could be very damaging to North Richland Hills, i.e., the repeal of the park tax. Mr. Sanford advised the City had been asked to join a consortium of cities to fight the legislation. The City's share would be $4,800 and if the expenses were greater, the City would pay its proportionate share. Any excess money at the end would be distributed back to the cities proportionately. Mr. Sanford requested the Council to approve joining the consortium. Consensus of the Council was to authorize the Mayor to sign the interlocal agreement agreeing to join the consortium and placing a designee on the committee, and a check be issued for $4,800 to be funded out of Council Contingency. Action to be ratified at the next Council meeting. Mr. Sanford advised that a meeting had been set for November 22 in Austin. CONSIDER Mayor Brown advised this item needed to be RANDY ESTABLISHING removed from the Consent Agenda and tabled. POOL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE AND LOT GRADING REGULATIONS FOR SWIMMING POOLS - ORDINANCE NO. ?1~A. e Pre-Council Minutes November 11, 1996 Page 3 e e ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT LOCAL LAW There were no questions from the Council. NAN ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT ADVISORY BOARD- RESOLUTION NO. 96-68 INTERLOCAL There were no questions from the Council. NAN AGREEMENT FOR SOLID WASTE GRANT FUNDS FOR MOBILE COLLECTION UNIT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE - RESOLUTION NO. 96-53 PROPOSED BILL There were no questions from the Council. NAN BY STATE SENATOR TOM HAYWOOD- RESOLUTION NO. 96-70 AWARD OF BID There were no questions from the Council. NAN ON MISCELLANEOUS OVERLAND RELIEF PRo.lt-( I ~ - 1996 e · e e Pre-Council Minutes November 11, 1996 Page 4 ITEM DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT OTHER ITEMS Attorney McEntire advised he had settled two NAN claims against the City for $5,000 each. Mr. McEntire advised he had attended a conference in which some planning and zoning and platting problems were discussed. Mr. McEntire advised he needed to discuss this information with the Council in Executive Session at the next Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Brown adjourned the Pre-Council Meeting at 7:07 p.m. /I e e e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCil CHAMBERS. 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820· NOVEMBER 11.1996 -7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order November 11, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Mack Garvin Lyle E. Welch JoAnn Johnson Don Phifer Byron Sibbet Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Staff: C.A. Sanford Randy Shiflet Larry Cunningham Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Greg Dickens City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer Absent: Mark Wood Councilman Linda Spurlock Sansoucie Councilwoman 2. INVOCA TION Councilman Sibbet gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES OF THE PRE-COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 28, 1996 APPROVED Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Phifer, to approve the minutes of the October 28, 1996 Pre-Council Meeting. e ""C' e - City Council Minutes November 11, 1996 Page 2 Motion carried 5-0. 5. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 28, 1996 APPROVED Councilman Phifer moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve the minutes of the October 28, 1996 Council Meeting. Motion carried 5-0. 6. PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. TEEN COURT ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES No action necessary. 7. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Phifer removed Item No. 9 from the Consent Agenda. 8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (10,11,12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20,21,22 & 23) APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 5-0. 9. GN 96-135 - CONSIDER ESTABLISHING POOL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE AND LOT GRADING REGULATIONS FOR SWIMMING POOLS - ORDINANCE NO. 2154 TABLED Councilman Phifer moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to table GN 96-135. Motion carried 5-0. e City Council Minutes November 11, 1996 Page 3 *10. GN 96-136 - LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT ADVISORY BOARD - RESOLUTION 96-68 APPROVED *11. GN 96-137 - INTER-LOCAL AGREEMENT FOR SOLID WASTE GRANT FUNDS FOR MOBILE COLLECTION UNIT FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE - RESOLUTION NO. 96-69 APPROVED *12. GN 96-138 - PROPOSED BILL BY STATE SENATOR TOM HAYWOOD - RESOLUTION NO. 96-70 APPROVED e *13. GN 96-139 - REQUEST TO APPROVE AMENDMENT TO CIVIL SERVICE RULE 11.01 - ORDINANCE NO. 2155 APPROVED *14. PU 96-84 - REQUEST TO APPROVE BID FOR 1996-97 PROPERTY INSURANCE APPROVED *15. PU 96-85 - AWARD ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR PRINTING OF LEISURE RESOURCE GUIDE APPROVED *16. PU 96-86 - AWARD ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR COMPUTERS APPROVED e City Council Minutes November 11, 1996 Page 4 e *17. PU 96-87 . AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF IBM OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE UPGRADE APPROVED *18. PU 96-88 - AWARD BID FOR ANNUAL SUPPLY OF UTILITY BILLS AND ENVELOPES APPROVED *19. PW 96-51 - AWARD OF BID ON MISCELLANEOUS OVERLAND RELIEF PROJECTS - 1996 APPROVED e *20. PAY 96-09 - APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.8 IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,346.12 TO ED BELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. FOR GREEN VALLEY DRIVE PAVING, DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *21. PAY 96-10 - APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. SIN THE AMOUNT OF $49,619.61 TO WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. FOR PRECINCT LINE ROAD UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS, PHASE 2 APPROVED *22. PAY 96-11 - APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT TO JRJ PAVING, INC. FOR STREET RECONSTRUCTION OF DEAVER DRIVE APPROVED *23. PAY 96-12 - PAYMENT OF ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES TO NCTCOG FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97 IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,155.00 APPROVED e e e e 24. CITIZENS PRESENTATION City Council Minutes November 11, 1996 Page 5 Mr. Charles Rogers and Ms. Fay Rogers, 6417 Rogers Drive, appeared before the Council and requested that the City continue the asphalt on Rogers Drive to the end of the road. 25. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting. Tommy Brown - Mayor A TrEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of North Park Baptist Church to rezone Lot 1, Block A, North Park Church Addition, from R-3 Single Family Residential to U Institutional. (Located at 7025 Mid-Cities Boulevard) Ordinance Number 2156 Agenda Number: PZ 96-25 North Park Baptist Church is located at 7025 Mid Cities Boulevard. The church property is currently zoned R-3 Single Family Residential, and the church has applied for a zoning district change to the U Church School and Institutional zoning district. The U Church School and Institutional zoning district is intended to allow only non-profit activities of an educational, religious, governmental or institutional nature. Typical uses allowed in the U district include religious institutions, public and private schools, day care centers and parks. Offices of local, state and federal governments are also allowed in the U district. The property to the north, east and west of the church is zoned R-3 Single Family Residential. A church is an allowed use in this district. However, the U district is designed to allow the church more flexibility and diversity in its operation. The property to the south, across Mid Cities Boulevard, is vacant and is zoned R-7-MF Multi-Family. This zoning change request is consistent with the development policies stated in the Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan. This item has been scheduled for a Public Hearing in accordance with Section 211 of the Texas Local Government Code. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at its November 14, 1996, meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required public hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget ~~~~ epartment Head Signature Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM \~\\ ð~vJ( \ ~ity Manager ,Finance Director J e e 6-26 PUBLIC H SMI SUR FAMILY OF MARVIN D. J 2, CONDRA (SINGLE LANE Chairman rfield asked i one in the audi e wanted to spea this request. ere being no Chairman Barfie sked for any opp nts to come forward. re being non, rs. Spicer made motion to appro 96-26, as presente The motion w econded by Mr. en. Mr. mith, the property er, came forwa ad if there were an uestions regar nd apologize r his tardiness his zoning req t. one, Chairman B ion carried 5-0. 7. PZ 96-25 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF NORTH PARK BAPTIST CHURCH TO REZONE LOT 1, BLOCK A, NORTH PARK CHURCH ADDITION, FROM R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY) TO U (INSTITUTIONAL) (LOCATED AT 7025 MID-CITIES BOULEVARD) APPROVED Ie Mr. Barfield opened the public hearing and asked staff to explain the request. Mr. LeBaron stqted that several weeks ago representatives from North Park Baptist Church had contacted the Inspection Department inquiring about permits for an expansion to their facilities. In doing so, they discovered the zoning would prohibit their development plan. The church indicated several years ago they had applied for rezoning: however, no records could be found to substantiate there request. therefore this request represents their interest in rezoning the property to Institutional so that it is consistent with other institutional properties in the city that have churches or schools located at those facilities. 3 e Mr. Gene Edwards, Pastor of North Park Baptist Church came forward and stated he would answer any questions regarding this request. There being none, Mr. Barfield asked if there was any other persons wanting to speak regarding this request. There being none, Mr. Barfield closed the public hearing and called for questions. Mrs. Spicer made the motion to approve PZ 96-25, as presente.s;l The motion was seconded by Mr. Miller. The motion carried 5-0. 8. RING TO CONSID KETING GROU 0 REZONE LOT 1, N, FROM C-1 (L L RETAIL) TO C-2 DAVIS BOULE D AND, PZ 96-24 LIC HEARIN CON SID THE REQUEST NDAU MARKET GROUP FO SPECIAL US ERMIT FOR USE AR AND TRAILER ES ON LOT , BLOCK 11, EME D HILLS ADDITI (ALSO 5440 DA V OULEV ARD) e an Barfield opened t ublic hearing and d staff to explain t zoning guest. Mr. LeBaron st Landau Marketin roup owned a facill Davis Bo vard which had previo been the site of a sicians office. The property wa oned Local Retail. The rent tenant is inter d in placing trailers and us cars on the facility; how ,a C-2 zoning an ecial Use rmit for used c and trailer sales is requir 0 accommodate th OF LANDAU D HILLS CATED e icant, Mr. Dar Debellis, came forward a poke in favor of th request, ting that his c pany markets and sales c 0 carriers and he is interested i lling an occa . nal used car on this prope Mr. I Helms, who lives 0 were m houses backing up property. e was opposed to thi ix months at which ales. Mr. Davis ides of this 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2156 _ AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2, SECTION 200, OF ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 22, 1993; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a change in zoning district boundaries; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, in Case Number PZ 96-25, the following described property shall be rezoned from R-3 Single _FamilY Residential to U Institutional: Lot 1, Block A, North Park Church Addition This property is generally located in the 7025 Mid Cities Boulevard. 2. THAT, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein. 3. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, e paragraph or section. 4. _EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14th DAY OF NOVEMBER 1996. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 25th DAY OF NOVEMBER 1996. _ Mayor City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City e Ordinance No. 2156 Page 2 NRH APPLICATION FOR A ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE City of North Rlchland ... 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 817-581-5500 (PluM print or type .a respanA.) PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant I agent: North Park Baptist Church Street address of applicant I agent: 7025 Mid-Cities Blvd. City I State I Zip Code of applicant I agent: North Richland Hills, TX 76180 PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of property owner. North Park Baptist Church SÜ8etaddressofpropertyowner. 7025 Mid-Cities Blvd. City I State I Zip Code of property owner. North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Note: Attach letter or affidavit from property owner if different fn!m applicant I agent: Telephone number of applicant I agent: 817-281-2146 Telephone number of property owner. 817-281-2146 PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Current zoning classification: Proposed zoning classification: Residential Institútional Proposed use of the property: ahuJ:Ch eason for zoning district change: To avoid problems that accompany existing residential zoning classifications. LSf/B1 Description of Property where zoning district change is being requested: 0 Subdivision, in the William Mann Survey, Abstract County, TX Street address at location where zoning district change is being requested: 7025 Mid-Cities Blvd. North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Survey O,T map attached as required by application 'Yes D No Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner. C:=J Yes I I No I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the properly described above and do hereby submit this request for approval of a zoning district change to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideretion. Date: lei Z/q", PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Planning & Zoning Commission Public Hearing: 14 W~~eee. b¡lg Date of City Council Public Hearing: Taxes Paid? ~ Yes D D D No Print Name: No Zoning District Change Approved: D Yes DNa 'itions of Approval: Liens Paid? ~Yes Asse~ts Paid? Yes No ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE CD - 407 (2/96\ ~~~ 0~1~f-;;--::1:::':::1; \;1¡\.' ñ_ ; ~ ..:. J ~~ :1 - J :: ¡. '\ I ¡ ~ ~ $~.~: ; .. ..¥ ~ .. Y:I.. ... ~ I::J:/~ .\~. :I:: . ~ r-- ,1/..r.. ,..;..- ~íJ) " -.. ' 7 O~ \ ~ r Qr--- .. ~ ~_ .. ~ ¡~ . g - ~ . '1- - G I - RUFE SNOW DR. ú!'ð ~':ð~ - ~ ~~ -:i.7 - C')~ (;;) . . ... I.þQ 'Õ~ 90. Q. ~ ~~ ~ f ''1:: ~ ~ 0 % ~ I ~ (') I .- ¥ l ! ~~ ¡ _ ~ :III:J I ~ I ~ "" ~ ~;~.Y .. -. !" ~ L. ~ o ~ ;.; ¡ ~ ~ Ö ... ....c: go go -1 cs. ~ BLVD. .- e '" .. :III:J I > C') ')/J.. . [ ~ . .' ¡ ..... :: . .. . I . .. .. .. ; ¡¡: - . ¡ .. :: .. .. ¡ ::: ¥ ; . . ~ .. :s - ~ ., .. . . .. .. w .. .. .. - ::: - ; :: : - ~.. '0.1- ~~¥ S.. .. tft " ".i. 9- \~~ ~ t; :I ¡ . - !: . .. w .. w :: - .. t .. r--- ¡ . f-- .U....IT IIIIGI :: .. ;: .. I- " r-- ~~~ ! ,': ;¡: - " .. ¡ :: ~ ~ . ¡ ,-.--.., \"1 ::: I ~ ,-=- ~ 'lVATAUeA CITYI LI""TS - . NOITH IICHLAND HILL CITY LI""TS Ln W, ""'N .. - þ -2- ¡ .. ~ ~ Kurp¡ :tNQW UK. ... ~ õ· · ..I-I.. ·1.. ~ ~ ,: -,:~':' '-.'~ ':~lH ~ :::" ~ø,~ ,--:: .. -;.---;- : I - ;;: ¡; .:/ _ . ~r-- ~.. ' .. ~= (~~ ~-:- LJ¡ -.-. -;-'"---'~ ... ... r-.... -!.- - r-:--- ~ ~ I~· ..::: - ..~. ~L...:- L-.- r--. ~ - .. - -----. '1 ~ r-- .. - ~ - 3~." ../' :: .. ~.. -=- - i-lL- ~ ~L-': ~ ._ ""' :: - ... ~ -=-: I., . ./ . ~ - a~· ~- ~ - ;; .. ~r-!-----:-" :: -a ¡ ~a~. ::: . ¥ '" ~.. - i - õ ::; -=-; i ~ r-~ : ~ i; .. · ~ . ~ -L.. -:-- I ...:L- -:- g -:---L::-'- ~ _ : = -0.., -=-c.... ~~ : r- : I ~ :: -=--. 0 r- . 0 --k.-- - :......!.- - .. Ti.. : o - -~:: -0'" ~""... ~O~ ~.... r.-..~ ~ r--- õ ..~ ¡: o-.:!- _ !'~. ""~- ~ g - -' .. ~!".. ~ . - . 'WI -"'.....: !II ~ - --=-- - -!-- - -;- õ .... . ;-=--..,~...~,," ~ ~ · -Ë.- ~./ '\.õ- _ .::; -:--;¡. ~ .ì.- ¡ 1:: ~ ....-:~-- : --::...- . ~ ': - . - ¡t .. t---': -=-.. .....i.- -=-.: Wtt~t~~:' ,~'"'::±. ~¿ . :§:f.~~~ll~i.:¡;~i.:¡· ~~ ~~ I: 0r~ ~î , , . .... ...... ~~.... ..,'.' ~ ¡ I ...... ~ ~ !{%ffft,.·:{;rt ~ I~: ~- :::/~ ~/~r:: r·~" ·1<= .. I~ , .:::~':::}'::~:~:::~::::.. ~ - "I 1 IvAkIF'flO.O - ;:: .. .;; - :.:..:..:.:..:.::.:..:.::.: ,"'" .. I 10/' ~ I... J' / .... 11 .. II· 'I' ../"1" .. ! W; I, I I ," /- I /T--¡ " J" ~ . - ~. y:.~:UT~~· ~ ::: 1;: :: .. .. ~õ : .::; :/~ Ij ~ r, IJI-A I _ ~ ~"f. . .. ::: ::! .. - - r--r-- ~; - 9J( ...n .. ""I:; !:.. . r- ~ ~ - ~ .;; ;: ..., - ~"r--- - ... ~ .. ~N .. IS" -L-I-;::"-....L- -:- : _ ~UT/f ,,'(S- --:-..,.. \,oor----- ~-.. _... DICK FISHEl t -::- ; .. r-:-""':- 7 ~ ~ _ J" . _ ~ iJ' -=-. I '_ ~.. --.L... .. ':" 1\,00 ¡--- ~ - 1;:--- ~.., _ ! ... -"=::"'-I/I~.. .0_. ,. .., "" ~ . - t: ' . -=-- ~.. .... n..,. ... .~.. ~..,. L... ~ £ ~ I a !: ~ a ñ ~.. n" .. Pl. . III . % ~ . =~-:-- ~ ::; -!:: I I _0· :.., ! 0- I:~~;-=-~=~ - ;:: . _ 0 "" S~ õ . ~ ~ .~ ~ "i õ . .. I: 0 ~ ~ ~S_': - " \ : -=--' ..., _ ~o. - ¡ -L : I ~ : =1'::; ~I: ~_ Õ - :"4':l1S:,;)~\" -:--- 0 _ ~- w·:- .... - ._ _. .. I W .-=--; ~o :, .. ~ ¡ ¡; ~ ; ¡¡: r ::c+ : ~ 10: \~ .. ~ : I; 'I" ; f; ~,~ ~ ! 1\".. .. .. ., ~;.... I'~ ~ - L...- ~ = ; ~:~ ~ .. '\ 0" . I; ~(¡r:lyl¡&. ~ ë; ..., .- AVM 010'" ::: !. ¡: I,;¡ ¡ - - 1- I - I ~~ ' \ \ .. 1. I" .. : i: ~~ ~ .... :: ; ,;¡ i::: ;. \j : ~.. "; I' õ~ ~ ~ ~ "'n ", -~... u .. l ..-,)~ <:"~ ~..-,) 7~ -, '- - ~ '& n I .- - ~ ¡ . .. .. ; ; œ . / .., " -- , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Agenda Number: PZ 96-26 Marvin D. Smith to rezone Tract 2CC and a portion of Tract 2, Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from AG Agriculture to R-1 Single Family Residential. (Located in the 7600 block of Douglas Lane) Ordinance Number 2157 Marvin Smith is the owner of a 1.91 acre tract of land located in the 7600 block of Douglas Lane. The property is located just east of Cimmarron Drive and is presently zoned AG Agriculture. The owner has submitted a zoning change request to R-1 Single Family Residential in order to develop the property. The purpose of the R-1 district is to is to provide for areas for very low density development of single family residences constructed at an approximate density of 2.9 units per acre. The R-1 district requires a minimum lot size of 13,000 square feet, and a minimum dwelling unit size of 2,000 square feet. Since this property is being platted, the houses will require a side or rear entry garage. The property to the south, east and west is zoned AG Agriculture and consists of mostly acreage tracts. The houses to the north, across Douglas Lane, are zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. The 100 acre city park is also to the north of the property. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this property for low density single family residential development. The zoning district change request is consistent with the development policy set out in the Land Use Plan. This zoning change request is also consistent with the surrounding development patterns. The applicant has submitted a preliminary plat of the property. The Planning and Zoning Commission will consider this plat at a future meeting. A Public Hearing has been scheduled for this item in accordance with Section 211 of the Texas Local Government Code. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at its November 14, 1996, meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDA TION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required public hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~/~~ a ent Head Signature . Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available ,Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . 6. PZ 96-26 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF MARVIN D. SMITH, TO REZONE TRACT 2CC, AND A PORTION OF TRACT 2, CONDRA SURVEY, ABSTRACT 311, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) LOCATED IN 7600 BLOCK OF DOUGLAS LANE APPROVED Mr. Barfield opened the public hearing and asked staff to explain this request. Mr. LeBaron stated the property is a 1.9 acre tract of land that is currently zoned agriculture, located on Douglas Lane, that an existing house is located on a portion of the property and the vacant land immediately west of the house is also being considered as a part of this zoning request. Mr. LeBaron stated the property owner had indicated an interest in constructing a new single family house on the vacant tract. Chairman Barfield asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak in favor of this request. There being none, Chairman Barfield asked for any opponents to come forward. There being none, Mrs. Spicer made the motion to approve PZ 96-26, as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Owen. . Mr. Smith, the property owner, came forward and apologized for his tardiness and asked if there were any questions regarding his zoning request. There being none, Chairman Barfield called for a vote on the motion previously made. The motion carried 5-0. P PAR CHURCH Mr. Ba ring and as staff to explain t Mr. LeB stª-ted that several ks ago repre tatives from No Baptist Ch h had contacted the In ction Depart t inquiring abo ermits for an expan to their facilities. In d so, they disc red the zoning uld rohibit their de opment plan. The chur 'ndicated sev ears ago they applied for re ing; however, no recor Quid be found ubstantiate the equest, there this request represents ir interest in ring the prope to Institutional that it is consistent with er institutional erties in the city t have churche r schools located at thos cilities. . 3 · ORDINANCE NO. 2157 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2, SECTION 200, OF ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 22,1993; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a change in zoning district boundaries; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: · 1. THAT, in Case Number PZ 96-26, the following described property shall be rezoned from AG Agriculture to R-1 Single Family Residential: Being a tract of land out of the John Condra Survey, Abstract No. 311, Tarrant County, Texas and being the same tract of land as described in Deed recorded in Volume 6987, Page 678, and Volume 12525, Page 842, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being described as follows: Beginning at a 1/2" iron pin set in the south line of Douglas Lane for the northwest corner of tract being described, said point being located 9.47 feet north 00 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds west and 319.97 feet north 89 degrees 46 minutes 19 seconds east from the northeast corner of Lot 1. Block 5, Mar Oaks Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-172, Page 28, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; · Thence north 89 degrees 46 minutes 19 seconds east 339.04 feet along the south line of said Douglas Lane to a 1/2" iron pin set for the northeast corner of tract being said point also being the northwest corner of a tract of land as described in Volume 11511, Page 2007, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; · Thence south 00 degrees 02 minutes 07 seconds east 247.95 feet along the west line of said tract as described in deed recorded in Volume 11511, Page 2007 to a 1/2" iron pin set for the southeast corner of tract being described; Thence north 89 degrees 20 minutes 50 seconds west 339.06 feet to a 1/2" iron pin set for the southwest corner of tract being described; Thence north 00 degrees 02 minutes 11 seconds west 242.74 feet to the point of beginning and containing 1.91 acres of land more or less. This property is generally located in the 7600 block of Douglas Lane. 2. THAT, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein. 3. · SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14th DAY OF NOVEMBER 1996. · Ordinance No. 2157 Page 2 . Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 25th DAY OF NOVEMBER 1996. Mayor City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: . City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City . Ordinance No. 2157 Page 3 NRH APPLICATION FOR A ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 817-581-5500 . (Please print or type all responses) PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant / agent: Marvin D. Smith S~eetaddressofappHcant/agent: 7609 Douglas Lane City / State / Zip Code of appHcant / agent: Telephone number of applicant / agent: PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of property owner: 7609 Dou las Lane City / State / Zip Code of property owner: North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Telephone number of property owner: (817)498-9810 Note: Attach letter or affidavit from property owner if different fro..m appHcant / agent: PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Current zoning classification: Proposed zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: A ricultural Reason for zoning district change: R-1 Sin Ie Famil N/A Legal Description of Property where zoning district change is being requested: ondra Surve roximatel 2 acre tract Street address at location where zoning district change is being requested: ìi21>.CT .2cc. ~ ïi<J.c;¡ 2. A. - ~\ c......~... ~. 7609 Dou las Lane North Surveyor map attached as required by appHcation [K] Yes 0 No Richland Hills Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner: c=J Yes I No N/A I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the property described above and do hereby submit this request for approval of a zoning district change to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration. Date: Octobp-r 24, 1996 Print Name: Marvin D. Smith Signature: PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Planning & Zoning Commission PubHc Hearing: Taxes Paid? W Yes D D D Fee: No Case Number: P2. <::¡4, '¿lD Date of City Council Public Hearing: Uens Paid? ŒJ Yes No $300.00 Zoning District Change Approved: DYes DNo onditions of Approval: Assessments Paid? [2[] Yes No This application will not be scheduled for public hearing until the application fee is received. ZONINr, nl~TRIr.T r.~A~~¡:: .......- ,-.--, . \ ;-íC'- ".0;. ~ \,out' R -\ . \~\ , ~~~';~ ~ If I -J¡, ,. }tJ '1 .. 1 U II '-~- , > K~~~ L\ 11 < . ,. \~. I' I. ~-:- ~.::'~. : ---1 n ~ ,. \ ~ 2 _ _ ~:: _: JO JI I J:T:: cr. ~ __..............._........-.-:'[-AR~f:.sj;iRD,.......,; ...;~"S.. .........:............ =: Æ ~ .. .. .. .................................... ......... .. ............ J' J7 IN.l R-3 1365 ~1 32 'J} ,. R-1.-..... 1625 ~ I 01. 1J 7' I" 76 .........",,;;. .¡r...¡., Ii !' , . ! - I , : R-2 J 109 0 - · - Ii · ,. - I! 1 R 2111 15 6 . , " 72 ~J 1 .~ Ov....¡ . ~. , kc tL-¥.(u 1 Il~ \] P-;- .. .- .. - 'J AG - 7 , " - - -~__s 4 I ~ J 10 ~- -~--~ ~ , < .. t....- I. ~ -~-r-p- ~ 'l C> 7 I 11 ' 7 " R-2 IH.' " i-- '0 , JI ., Ii' I- II lIHCOlH 01. " ~I!U;SU1C ~--!o!l;1 ' '; I 10,9~ JII' ) J . )M' , .-::-.- --~. \L O"."HD co..... CT "". :. ~. ~~~~" " '. " -;~~..~/ I--~: ±'j~ ~ I. ; ,. ~_ i --'I'" "~-··T" I'~· d II 11 Uz 11 11 ~ t, I) I It I,) 11 ~ü STARNES RD. ,. I I) JJ , 1 J . !--~ I Z n »1 \ '" 3' J6 ':ø.' \ ) ~ ~þ " 12 ~ JO 1"1: 'I 19 J. t 2 21 J. '0 . . , r--:- 6 ) - R-t .' · f39 1 J ~ 6 7 . Ij ~ I I' - . - I J f--- I 1 C > , II . I " ~·I I . u I,) " CI((H HIU. T.. I " ~ ~ 11 ~,. .: _,I,~ ~. _~I ; .. ~) II 16 ' ..... ~... 0(, ...,+ -. II .. 1~ 0' " OJ IJ o 11 + .. II (, 11 ., - . .,+ ~.... (, ,. __4_ _--- Û J -u'- 1 ! 1 ~I- If' ~ 1 I. " " II r-- IIDenO' .0. I- ~LJ~.!~- 1J' 'J - IZ I- - , , I J I' I ~ 71 ---. . .;~.{ HAHQIHC CII" 1&. ~ " I. .. .. IJ 11 ~> :- -; ~~:-~. : fHACI 0 i IJ ''.I.".s~\\.- ... : -- .- ., 11 ';; ~ INAC.' J " '.y.~\~\ i .. IN4C.1 I IU J CIUN l'OCt - :..1 ~o I.'~ I . ! ... .. ;, , . . " . - '--- ~ ~ 10 I 'J } -_. --"- > . .. . II ;( -- --- _. .-- 0 J " ) .. --- --- Ordin..nee No. 201-4, ZONING MAP Grid: , . '.....1 I · Ü !! . R-1-S 1896 · 8j IN. ~... -- 1 ~ ... I. .1. · .. - .. ..u u.. .. ...n....... .........n .. .... - R-3 n., tl · V ;~~ ·rfi; r--- 'R-2 1092 ,. '0 ·'·I~.~_. lit " - -- ._- IW.1TI , ------ ''',10 ,.. , ! ,. 7. : -.'----. ¡ j --- ò 0·· .0 IN 1it ¡STARNES R ... , 01:. , 'N 11 - -. o ._-- , -. J-2 'H32 · , - o Dar. D:!J'IiIlK.t1Fl . >I ,.. :PC "- AG ,. III ,.&(t. t-,·s 15'1' .e":l " II-'·S 1115'1 .. ....... I \\ . ! ~,,\\1. . '.\~;''f:J ""'cr 4 '....Cl , IM4CI '1 .. - -. - ...-.---- " IHACI I .. R -1 - 5 - ... ..- 1896 I" lv '0 ._ _..____.,_..._ I" i. ¡ I'" ).. :>UGH: J - , ~S'\· - 'tI 00 D ~I;; ~\~~ , 'ð ':).;'§J , - 0 R-2· , 1 437 U 1-415 '0 n_' ....... .... ..... .......-... .................. HI., ~. flit.,.. R·2 1374 AG Ii ~~~( ¡... °1 ~\.o\.o R-2 1529 ,,,. JC ,- ,.. JC i \.0,\;0'\ ~ ~ -c.t> 1 : 4' - -'--~ ..j U .0 -. ,.... Iw .. ~G - '., u., ... --- --.---...--- 'N .ut4 U .QJ R-1 ....1~.~.3. ............. .t....:. ....'.... G I S .ec_.. :r NtD I .. .. o elob e r 10, 19'H IIIi!!!!!I KNOWl.ION- ENQISH-FLOW9lS. INC. 78 - 4 40 P a q e: ß '" !JI.IIIi:J ('QOo_"'-C;. --,-.& , .... -..--... ..................... R-2 ··..·...u ..... I i , -- .. -.- 6 ~ < - ~ - - , - ~ J - , - - I 1,,00K[ - . r--i - " - .. ---- 7) . -; 10 <- - \. lJ , -- ~ I ,. ~-2S - " - 11 '..J' IJ .. u -;: II U < I~ ..\( S -ý.;.\\~ II . r-- --¡- - - 1 j - -'lc :)t \~rc\'-;- , -. ~ J- - I ..- c -c_ I ( o a- · 0 - 01-- ~I~l. II 1 1 ~ - ~--o - \~~ = ~.~ \\ II " ,..... .. ,. ...., .... '.....7 ~... '. ~- 11 [-:;-. J ~~\) ,. ~_.c.UT.I:1:J'/M~Q S ./.1.1 ~o R 2-1!60 I -1600 ~,. ,,\ 4~ /., ¡4" .!J ~O)1 '!at r I1IJ 1-0'1;L~~¡ .- ¡ 1-~·~lI·t 'O.1J ___ AG ! --Å---~ U'. 'II Uf.II' ~ - ': -0- o ': 0" '~~~I .' - ~~·~.s . -!. . J::.':.' !.~'!~___..__ N I[ R:;.S I I - ,..., " 89 ~ . ... _. 1~.... .... :! ...'........ .. ............ 'fI.."' II II I " 58 .. m tB II :[] N.RTI RICHL": r- '.,.NI '- . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Daniel G. Ham Agenda Number: PZ 96-27 to rezone Tract 2C6, Peck Survey, Abstract 1210; and portion of Lot 1, Block 1, McKee Addition, from AG Agriculture to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential. (Located at 7612 Shady Grove Road) Ordinance Number 2158 Daniel G. Ham is the owner of a 1.13 acre tract of land located on the south side of Shady Grove Road, about one-half mile east of Smithfield Road. The owner has submitted a zoning district change request on the property to change the designation from AG Agriculture to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential. The applicant proposes to construct a single family residence on the property. The purpose of the R-1-S zoning district is to provide for areas for very low density development of single family residences constructed at an approximate density of 1.0 unit per acre. The district provides for a quasi-rural setting planned to allow for the keeping of livestock in a residential setting. The R-1-S district requires a minimum lot size of one acre (43,560 square feet), and a minimum dwelling unit size of 2,000 square feet. Since this property is being platted, the house will require a side or rear entry garage. The property to the south and west is zoned AG Agriculture and consists of single family residences on large acreage tracts. The property to the east is zoned R-2 Single Family Residential and is part of the Shady Oaks development. The property to the north is located in the City of Keller. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this property for low density single family residential development. The zoning district change request is consistent with the development policy set out in the Land Use Plan. This zoning change request is also consistent with the surrounding development patterns. The applicant has also submitted a final plat of the property which is scheduled for consideration by the City Council at this meeting. A Public Hearing has been scheduled for this item in accordance with Section 211 of the Texas Local Government Code. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at its November 14, 1996, meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required public hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available ,Finance Director ~ J\CL¡~i'\ . CI Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM · · · 4. PS 96-31 OR REPLA TED IN TH VARD) LINDA OWE DDITION. (L BOU F LOT 1 R, BLOCK 33, 00 BLOCK OF DAVIS ted he was oving this item u om the end of developer wo n't have to hrough the entir eeting. Mr. Sa staff to explain t item. Mr. ~ aron explained 's is a small com ial tract, oned C-2, locate t the interse 'on of Ross Roa ith Davis Bouleva The . e included a portio f Ross Ro which is to be a ndoned as a portio th lat. He stated tha e develop surveyor was i e audience to ans any estions. Mr. Gary rtis came ard to answer stions. There were none. ed that since he ti questioning and a conflict 0 terest in this p ing of this it otion to approve S 96-31, as sented and a e placed on the pia quiring drainage d grading pi ining a building pe 't. The m . n was seconded Owen ab ining. d 4-0 with Mr. 5. PZ 96-27 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF DANIEL G. HAM TO REZONE TRACT 2C6, PECK SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1210; AND A PORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MCKEE ADDITION, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE )TO R- 1-S, (SPECIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL). (LOCATED AT 7612 SHADY GROVE ROAD) APPROVED Chairman Barfield opened the public hearing and asked those wanting to speak in favor to come forward. Ms. Ham, the property owner, came forward to speak in favor of the request. Chairman Barfield asked that anyone else wishing to speak in favor or against this zoning request come forward. There being none, Mr. Barfield closed the public hearing. Mr. Owen made the motion to approve PZ 96-27, as presented. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Spicer. The motion carried 5-0. 2 · ORDINANCE NO. 2158 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2, SECTION 200, OF ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 22,1993; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received a request for a change in zoning district boundaries; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property as set forth herein; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: · 1. THAT, in Case Number PZ 96-27, the following described property shall be rezoned from AG Agriculture to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential: ALL that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Thomas peck Survey, Abstract 1210, Tarrant County, Texas and being that same tract described to Lisa Barrette McKee Ham and husband, Daniel Gordon Ham as recorded in Volume 12439, Page 1657, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of Lot 1, Block 1, McKee Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-167, Page 23, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and also being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2 inch capped steel rod stamped "MOAK SURV INC" set at the northeast corner of said Lot 1, said point being in the south right-of-way line of Shady Grove Road (a variable width right-of-way), said point also bears south at 11.70 feet from a 5/8 inch steel rod found; · THENCE south with the east line of said Lot 1, 390.47 feet to a 1/2 inch steel capped rod stamped "MOAK SURV INC" set from which a 5/8 inch steel rod found for the southeast corner of said Lot 1 bears south at 439.87 feet; . THENCE north 89 degrees 15 minutes 02 seconds west, 124.15 feet to a 5/8 inch steel rod found at an ell corner of said Lot 1 and being the southeast corner of that same tract described to David J. McGilvray and wife, Mary Ann McGilvray as recorded in Volume 7661, Page 1741, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE north with the east line of said McGilvray tract and continuing with the west line of said Ham tract passing a 24 inch oak tree in the north line of said Lot 1 at 387.66 feet and continuing a total distance of 399.34 feet to a 5/8 inch steel rod found at the northwest corner of said Ham tract; THENCE north 89 degrees 33 minutes 11 seconds east with the north line of said Ham tract and said south right-of-way line, 102.07 feet to a 3/8 inch steel rod found at the northeast corner of said Ham tract; THENCE south with the east line of said Ham tract, 11.50 feet to a 1/2 inch capped steel rod stamped "Moak Survy Inc" set in the said north line of Lot 1 ; THENCE north 89 degrees 27 minutes 12 seconds east with the said north line of Lot 1 and the south right-of-way line, 22.07 feet to the place of beginning and containing 1.1359 acres, more or less, as surveyed by David D. Moak Surveyors, Inc., in the month of June, 1996. . This property is generally located in the 7612 Shady Grove Road. 2. THAT, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein. 3. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. . 2 . . . 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14th DAY OF NOVEMBER 1996. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 25th DAY OF NOVEMBER 1996. Mayor City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City 3 NRH APPLICATION FOR A ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 817-581-5500 (;>Iease print or type all responses) PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant / agent: PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Current zoning classification: AG- Proposed zoning classification: R- -S Proposed use of the property: /Ve,W S;t\~l~ Fít~;/'t Re..,;ell'''~c. Reason for zoning district change: Legal Description of Property where zoning district change is being requested: -r,,~C1 "2.C~ / A. - \2-10 I ~""" :;"'¡i ~ (c¡:r¡ïOl-l ~I'" t....,-, \ I ßLD~ t ¡ ¡""-,,\Leç Po..t:>PIïIO\..¡ Street address at location where zoning district change is being requested: i G \"2. <;\J. ~ ~~t=;. ~ç' p attached as required by application Yes D No Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner: c::J Yes I No Date: I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the property described above and do hereby submit this request for approval of a zoning district change to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration. 16 - &C¡~9h '@) c Signature: Print Name: PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Planning & Zoning Commission Public Hearing: Taxes Paid? DYes D D D Case Number: No Date of City Council Public Hearing: Vens Paid? DYes Fee: No $300.00 Zoning District Change Approved: DYes DNo Assessments Paid? DYes No onditions of Approval: This application will not be scheduled for public hearing until the application fee is received. ZONING DISTRIr.T r.~AN~J= .""'- ,....,""',.., ...,......................................................................... TR.2A4 ............ ............................. ................................ ····..·····1":...0....··········..···..····· . .............. ............... ...................... TR.1[ 2 '.>£.~~ -at>- \<:>~ TR.1C TA., I..2AJ 1..1 HI.'" TR.I' . TN .18 TR.IA . ~ .. 'ž ~I YR. ( KELLU CITY 1R.1 I... TS \)Gt.~. "C\1.'iì .po SH Y GROVE RD. IH.1C1 Iff, ,c NOITH IICHLAND HILLS CITY LIMITS C-l 14 24 TR.2A1 R-2 1122 AG þ.\)\)~ dC¥-£.£. t" 'tIü2ß ..... IH.7A ... R-2 c:¡ 1451 .. R-2 ... 1426 ., a.. R-2 1946 Q; .... .... I 0.2 <:> '" ... .. U '-I '-I c II) ~ - ..:a ~ .... 02 ~ ::; '- .. .. Ü C-2 ç, 1425 o lS CI C-2 1434 C-2 1321 R-2 1683 'N TR.2A'A .' ON ,.. -:: J.CO· R-2-1800 1439 R-2 1615 ........................................................................... : 84-444 Pag,: C3) ADOPTED: March 22. 1993 CURRENT THROUGH: Ordinance No. 2014, October 10, 199.. ZONING MAP Grid: 8..·..48 Page: C2 .1~-t.1 .. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Spain Properties Agenda Number: PZ 96-28 to rezone Block 11, Snow Heights North Addition, from R-7-MF Multi-Family Residential to a Planned Development for Multi Family Residential. (Located at the northeast corner of Lewis Drive and Kilmer Drive) Ordinance Number 2159 Spain Properties, based in Irving, is the owner of a 9.413 acre lot located at the northeast corner of Lewis Drive and Kilmer Drive, just east of Rufe Snow Drive. The owner has submitted a zoning district change request on the property to change the designation from R-7-MF Multi Family Residential to a Planned Development for Multi Family Residential. The purpose for the zoning change is to provide increased density for the development. The maximum density currently allowed by the multi-family zoning regulations is 16 units per acre. This site could support 150 units under existing regulations. The developer is requesting approval to increase the density to 20.40 units per acre (192 units). The property to the north and east is zoned R-7-MF. An apartment complex is located to the north, and several four-plexes are located to the east. The property to the south and west is zoned C-1 and C-2 Commercial. A large shopping center is located to the south, and a full service car wash and a mini warehouse are located to the west. Before a building permit can be issued, the Zoning Regulations equire the Planning Commission and City Council to review and approve the site plan for the complex. The proposed development is consistent with the surrounding development patterns, and the property could be developed as apartments without the zoning change. If constructed, this apartment complex will be the first built in North Richland Hills since 1984. Attached is a letter from the applicant's architect outlining the proposed development. The proposal meets the current requirements and intent of the R-7-MF zoning district, with the exception of density. A list of the apartment complexes in North Richland Hills showing the density of each complex is also attached. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at its November 14, 1996, meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required public hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available (Å ~~( 1ity Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ,Finance Director . perty if the zon hange request were no e location for the e of business he wa Barfi closed the public roved. Mr. Davi anting to start. man ssion or a motion. Chairman Barfie this request for 90 O. ailed for another moti . Mr. Miller seconde Mr. Owen made a tion to table motion. The mo 9. PZ 96-28 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF SPAIN PROPERTIES TO REZONE BLOCK 11, SNOW HEIGHTS NORTH ADDITION, FROM R-7-MF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. (LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LEWIS DRIVE AND KILMER DRIVE) APPROVED . Chairman Barfield opened the public hearing and asked staff to explain the request. Mr. LeBaron stated this was a 9.4 acre vacant tract currently zoned multi-family, but that current regulations only allowed a density of sixteen units per acre. The developer is requesting a planned development zoning classification to allow a higher density of 20.4 units per acre. Mr. Davis asked questions of the developer about the owners of the property to determine if a possible conflict of interest existed. Based on the responses, Mr. Davis determined there was no conflict of interest. Mr. Rick Garza represented the developer and spoke in favor of the request. Mr. Garza stated he needed to increase the density to make the property feasible. Mr. Barfield stated if any significant changes were made to the plans the developer would have to seek an amendment to his planned development. Mr. Owens asked if a security gate is included in his proposal. Mr. Garza stated his proposal included a card access system as well as considerable landscaping and other enhancements. Mr. Barfield asked if anyone else wanted to speak in favor of this request. There being none, Mr. Barfield asked if anyone wanted to speak in opposition or had questions regarding the proposal. . Mr. Larry White, 6897 Meadow Crest, spoke in opposition due to traffic problems on Rufe Snow. 5 . Ms. Linda McCall, 5520 Meadow Oak, spoke in opposition due to the traffic problems in the area. She stated she has had four cars in her yard during the past year and her mail box had been torn down. She stated it was too many people in the area. She believes there are already too many people from the three existing apartment projects in the area. She stated the entrance to the proposed project was on Meadow Crest and that would contribute to the traffic problems. Mr. Harold Westfall, 5527 Meadow Oak, spoke in opposition on the basis of traffic. He stated the original zoning density was already too much and didn't want to increase it any more. Mr. Harold Carner, 5508 Meadow Oak, spoke in opposition stating the traffic was too much in the area. He asked the Commission to consider reducing the density from the sixteen units rather than increasing the density. Ms. Jennifer Leigh, 6923 Sierra Lane, spoke in opposition because there was no light at Meadow Crest and Rufe Snow and was afraid of the traffic backing up. She asked if a traffic study had been done. Mr. Barfield stated that no traffic studies had been done in the area. Mr. Barfield asked if others wanted to speak, there being none, the public hearing was closed. . Mr. Davis stated the applicant could build on the property as it is currently zoned and platted. Mr. Davis stated that the past apartment projects built in the early 80's were built in the density ratios being requested by the developer and that he would be in favor of eighteen units per acre, and asked the developer if he could make the project work at that density. Mr. Garza stated he would have to re-evaluate the proposal. Mr. Davis expressed his interest in approving the request as presented, but to ask the city council to consider an alternate proposal to reduce the density. Mr. Davis stated the property had been zoned multi-family since the early 80's and was a good site for such a development. Mr. Garza stated he would be willing to table the request until he could re-evaluate the lower density. Mr. White asked questions from the floor regarding when the request would be considered by the city council. Mr. Davis stated at the next council meeting. Mr. Barfield explained the developers right to build under the existing rules and regulations. Mr. Davis and Mr. White had several exchanges regarding the density questions. e Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PZ 96-28 as submitted. Mr. Owen seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0. 6 . ORDINANCE NO. 2159 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ZONING REGULATIONS, ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, AS AMENDED, TO ESTABLISH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 23; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the developer of Block 11 Snow Heights North Addition has submitted a request to establish a multi-family development using a higher density than allowed by the zoning regulations of the City of North Richland Hills, and WHEREAS, the developer has expressed the need to increase the density from 16 units per acre to 20.4 units per acre to make the project economically feasible considering the amount of amenities proposed, and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by establishing PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 23, by changing said . Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, Planned Development District Number 23 be hereby established in the Case Number PZ 96-28, on the property shown on the attached "Exhibit A" and described as follows: Block 11, Snow Heights North Addition to the City of North Richland Hills. This property is generally located at the northeast corner of Lewis Drive and Kilmer Drive. 2. That, Planned Development District Number 23 shall consist of a Multi-family Residential Development. . Page 1 . . e 3. That, the development regulations for Planned Development District Number 23 shall be as follows: Maximum Density - 20.4 units per acre 4. That, all zoning regulations for the R-7-MF Multi-family Residential zoning district which are not in conflict with the terms of this Ordinance shall be applicable to this Planned Development District Number 23, except where amended herein. 5. That, the Official zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this Planned Development District. 6. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That, all regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance No. 1874, as amended, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Planned Development District Number 23, shall remain in effect regarding this property. 7. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. Page 2 . . . APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14 th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1996. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 25th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1996. Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Page 3 . fn .!E. CJ) - >< J:~ "C Co E: E .~8 u.... æ á3 .c E t::t:: o cu Z Co <C . >- -- ëñ c Q) o >- ..a "0 Q) t o en ~NNroID~oororo~MMNorooNmM ~~~~ro~N ~~N~NN~N~~~ I/) 01 C ;g :2 m CO) 0) an. I!'" CO) ~ ,... 0 0)'1" 0) eo ~ ~~I~ 2 .~. :f"~ ~~rn ,;; ':::' Ρ .~.;.~.¡:.i.: I ... ;¡:".,,, S:} ,T,,_"'" I ,..... co''', ~roo~mo OID~Nrol{) ~MccidaiM ~ M ~ o N ~ -ii. '0 It) c CD. . C ~~~f itt ~ CDM Old nI CD ... (J ~ ..... ~ Q CO) 0...., ~ CO) eo It) 0 0 .... N CD CD ~ ~.. 0) It) ~ ~ ..... CD 0 "lit.: óø)ø)ø)ø)cöcöcör..:U)&ri&ri~ ~,i~~.' .... .... ~ .....);:.~. ·.....¡F.:~~> : ~: "; ~ 7 ~.:.;..).' .... .ßilli. ¡ ';"'" .>; .~ v;,~"., '1'" !!." . :. .." ......:i,:~!; ~·I¡ !t:~ .~.¡¡:.j, ., ><-,: . '::,:-:,: <~:: ~;,;~~, ';:¡' .~,:' ',;5 j¡,-" ^-. M~I{)N~O~roO~roM~ ID~N"<tNI{)~IDmmN~"': N....:N~Nuidcci....:ui<Ò<Ò~ or- ~,....,.... or- Nor- oroID"<tOI{)~IDNoNro"<troOroOroNN Nomm"<tMrol{)l{)"<tNMoroIDMO~"<t~ I/) ~ ~NroNN~NNN~~~~~~N~ ~ c :J CD :J C ~ Q) Q) Q) "0 e 'E: ~ 'E: ~ "00"000::: ~~g~"O .~ ~ .~ 0 > Q) > 0 ffi"ã.ffi~ _ro_ro C>~C>:I: NO 0 M OOM~ ~I{)om ~~~~ CD E nI Z >< CD ã. E § o 0::: 0e!"O Q)~ êñ Q) ro E ..JW C) Q) & £ (¡; .!!! :z :J = 0 CT> '- C/)Q)U ~ C).I/) .~ :g ffi i!!:.cë Q) ~ .- _ 0 :J c>za "0 o ~ ~o::: a. "0 o 0 o 0 ..J ~ W ro Z:I: ~ 0 00 m I{) ID ro Q) I/) - c C Q) Q) 'õ "P C) ~ a.æ:2(¡; æc>O:::a. .t: I/) -g 32 êií :ß 0 f! ~Q.EQ) CT >o.!2 E WUOW Q) Q) > o .t: iQ '-OJ: é3 ~ Q) Q) "0 C)'S; œ ~ C Q) o~E UC>w IDI{)~ ID~"<t ~I{)M ~IDro Q) >. ~ 'E: ~ ~ð~~ I/) I/) :J ~ ~ 0 '- U ID «~ñi I/) 0 .t: 0....- C ìií I/) Q)Q)-ð Æ ~ C I{)~~ ~mN ~ro~ IDIDID ~ ~ ~"O U m ~~ 0"0 "0 0 ro 0 ~~ CD Q) .~ .È: 00 "0 ~ C Q) ro .- - > >oC Q) Q) ~ë5 roro mN I{)N ~ID C Q) I/) Q) -æ(5 o Q) "0;; C C ~ 0 {g 5 "E '§ a.~.g CD O Q) :¡:o O - .A :: ro·n I~3:~ .~ Q) "E o .È: ~ ~O~ o ~ 5 C Q) ID C/) 'S; I/) ~ ffi'S; &ë5~ I{) 0 00 N~ "<tID Q) Q) ~ .È: .~ SO oU¡¡¡ -U ~ ~ C Q) U .!!! 'S; ~ >0 C 0 ~å~ I{) N M M ~ ~ ~ NOO I{)ID~ I{)~~ I/) I/)~ .c - ro O-§¡Ol/) 0.- ~ ..J Q) C ro -u:I:.90 g~g>CD E -U '- C ro=E~ .- 0 Q) 0 O:I:O:::.... ~~~ C'?.~ai ~N.... N :3 ~ - Q.e J!! e (J ~oq: -.JO.... ........CD o 0 Q. .... CD J!! CD 01·... .Q q¡ c: e e :::) ::J (J CD <: q: 01 - - e s s CD ~~~ >0 ro ~ C ro "i5. a. « . . . SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY & CHARACTERISTICS 1.) The proposed activity for the property is multifamily residential with apartment type attached dwelling units with a density of20.40 units per acre or 192 total units. The buildings will be 2 - Story wood construction with at least 65% masonry veneer and the remaining being a synthetic system. Thus, creating a lower maintenance exterior with longevity. 2.) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Lot area requirements. Description Min. lot area - 4 acres Proposed: Min. lot ~ - 200 ft. Min. lot ~- 110 ft. Min. dwelling unit size - 650 Min. tront building line - 25 ft. Min. side building line - 15 ft. Min. rear building line - 25 ft. Rear yard open space area - Maximum Density - 16 units/acre Maximum Height - 50 ft. Maximum Number of Stories - 50 ft. Maximum lot coverage - 40% Spacing of buildings - See note 3 General Conditions: 9.413 acres'/ 659 ft. v 620 ft. v 650 ft. v 99 ft.' 74 ft./ 96 ft. /' Same v 20.40 units/acre \ 1(, D/J>.. &.j Oi<D, 40 ft. / 40 ft./ 38% ./ 20 ft../ 1. The proposed development will have combination decorative brick and wrought iron fence completely surrounding the development where the v wrought iron does not exceed 40% of the total wall face. 2. Parking- The proposed development will provide 455 parking spaces which exceed the 423 parking spaces required. Of the 455 parking spaces V' provided, 192 parking spaces will be covered. 3. Accessory Buildings - The proposed development will have an information centerlleasing office of approximately 1,200 square feet one-story building. v 4. The proposed development will follow the guidelines for customary home../ occupations. 5. No garages will be provided in the proposed development../ . . 6. The exterior of buildings will provide the minimum requirements by the v ordinance. 7. Landscaping Requirements - The proposed development will meet all landscape requirements by the ordinance. In addition, the proposed development will provide a "Landscape Buffer" of approximately 25' on all ,,/ three sides of the property bordered by streets. 8. Recreation Space Requirements - The proposed development will provide all required recreation space requirements such as a swimming pool and covered cabana with additional open space which can be utilized for volleyball, croquet, football, etc. 9. Signs - Signs will addressed as stated in the ordinance. 10. Refuse Containers - All refuse containers will meet the criteria of the ordinance. 11. Gated Entty - The proposed development will provide a secured./ development with security controlled access gates. Proposed Characteristics Summary The intent of the proposed development is to provide an extremely livable functional, safe, and secure living environment which provides amenities for living that are enjoyable while maintaining a strong attractive aesthetic. The proposed development will contain 192 rental units comprised of approximately 114 one-bedroom units and 78 two-bedroom units. With more than ample parking spaces in the development, every tenant will be guaranteed parking close to their home along with one covered parking space per unit. The landscaping will receive special attention, with a 25' landscape buffer on all three sides adjoining streets. This will enforce the strong aesthetic characteristics intended throughout this new development. . NRH APPLICATION FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richiand Hills. Texas 817-581-5500 (Please print or type aU responses) PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant / agent: RPGA Design Group, Inc. Architects, Richard P. Garza Street address of applicant / agent: 101 S. Jennings Avenue, Ste. 100 City / State / Zip Code of applicant / agent: Telephone number of applicant / agent.· Ft. Worth, ~exas 76104 PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION (817) 332-9477 Name of property owner: Spain Properties, Inc. and Citizens Bank of Clovis, New Mexico Street address of property owner: 367 East Las Colinas Blvd., Ste.155 City / State / Zip Code of property owner: Irving, Texas 75039 Note: Attach letter or affidavit from property owner if different from applicant / agent: Telephone number of property owner: (972) 402-8905 PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Current zoning classification: Proposed use of the property: R-7-MF Multi-Family escnbe the nature of the proposed activity and any particular characten·stics related to the use of the property: See Attached Summary Site plan atlached which conforms with the requirements included In this packet. Affidavit attached from property owner if applicant is not owner: CM Yes o No To be submitted on or before ¡XX! Yes I No November 8, 1996 I hereby certdy that I am, or represent. the legal owner of the property descnbed above and do hereby submit this request for approval of a Planned Development Distnctto the Planning and Zoning Co Ission for consideration. Date of Planning & Zoning Commission Public Hearing: 14 \-..\'l::HeN, ~ ~ lP Date of City Councit Public Hearing: TaXe¡ ~idí Yes Liens Paid' ~ Yes Date: 11 /l /96 RPGA Design Group, Inc. Architects Print Name: Richard P. Garza Signature: PART 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Planned Development Approved: DYes 0 No Assessments Paid? [J[j Yes D . CJ D No f"2 c:; (g- Zl Fee: No ..._ $300.00 No onditions of Approval: This application will not be scheduled for public hearing until the application fee is received. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CD -415 (2/96) I :t- o ¥ ,.oj ~ J ~~' y - ~~ I i ~1 = ;0 ""--v ð& oS'>- -P.... '1( A '1.p f" I:t- (¡( t- '9 ð .~ ! '2. ~ ~~ S 0 Õ I I < ;: I 7"";""; :.> O~::;:. ~ 'CÎ:;:"~ t> -t.:'; ~ . i :::1~lz - J: . r- r- '" ç;>-i Iz :: 01 () I N I If " ;; ,,' ..' .." i (II T . I " ! ~ I ~ ~ , i i - 7"1 .N; ,~ -l C( ~ N -1 - --ö .. I ~:I~ . 'ó ~ ~ I I. ~ ' J ..." I N . -.. Z:J C)/'I " ~Z ~? C)N .,0 -. ... .~ !' !I ~(') - OIL- 0..' d., I ,... ..-- ... ~ ~ ,. u .. I ~~ - O~ .. -.,.,,~. ~ ~N- ~~. ~ ~O ~I ;; 1 I ~_ "0' N' ~ ~ ~ T~~ ~N ~ëj ~ "' .. N' - -. . - ~ 'to _,' i 1 ~ 0 ............. ... I () - , ~ \ .. :::::¡;:;;:::::::::::~:::::::::::::J::~:::::::~;¡:::;11 ~ rJ ~ . :i¡2 ï ~ '6~ ! - \ ~ ~ ~. ~r¡%;:::;:;::::::;:;:':'::('::::':':~:?:;:':::~:::: --2 ! · .... ",'" · ~ _ ~ 0}. ._ ::#:,:,::,:¡::¡;,¡':':;t,:,:::::"::¡::t:::! ~'b ~ ' ~ 'ib If - ;- .~ ( ,,}:,¡;¡,{,~,{{,,;;;{;;:/{:;:{: ¡ 1 ~"' L _ ;¡: : E N : ;, .I¡::¡::'::::::::::~j::::::¡~::::::::::::::::::::::¡:¡:.¡:! ' I \ .. II1·.~· -.. ~, ¡ ¡ ¡. ,.."' ~ . 'ó I ~..:.:.:.:.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: , ,=- ¡ "I i-I: ¡,::: ~I ~I 1 I 'I ~ -- ~ I -1 11:1 t/ I .. , > J r _ i ~ , ~ ·I···:····:·~:·:r:::::::ü I Ii 7' ~ ' ,,: · ~:' """ i i q j, ¡!ï!ï I II ¡I i Ii: l.ï~ ïi w~ . " " 1_ þJ ;¡:... "'1;" ",." ,"Ii ". .1.1 I' ~ 1.~ _ L~WI' ¡ I / ." -;:;:- _I ·1"i'I'i¡I¡¡:I!:ªI·!I'!I!I!!i il~~ '1":.e¡r¡iU:: ." _~ i CT. .II .~, - I· I· . . ~.~ I-! i Ii ,I¡ !III ~ ". ~ ..... ~ .. 0: i· i I ..1 1 Om,- . I . AI ~ .... :··o!:·:I::!ll":i·I==R 4 .¿"';;=::;:, i 0101' !¡dl ... ---,"""" ..., . ,. I - - - D ' - .. ~..."... . I ' .. ' ".' I ." ''I' 1 ' ~:~~ ----, ~~; -I ., ~ ! . ¡ ~ I" 1- I ~ ¡ _I'. I~ ..: I, I '" I 'I':;;'I':I~I'~,!;~~ 'I ¡ .I.I,I.I,I.'.!.':', /'I _ r--l _ ..(ADOW o~ L2' I " I" I ~ " ':""'----1 I ~ '",... : .: I ~ = : ,_ _ ~ II ; I I .. " I · J 1 I ' ".,,~.... ... - - I' 'I' I ' " \ . 1 ''''+ ..¡-I-I-I.[.T" r- ~ '.. .1. ... "I I 111]-< ,,;;0; ~ ~ '~.~ ~ ~ " 'I ' [ , I ' I' , 1 'I ;1 ;-+-1; "-:l:' ~ '1'1' I ' I ~ ; :1: ; ~ ~CIITr-" ~ ! \ \ -;- ,I _ : . ":........ LJ - " ' , ii, I" :..... ... - I ~Œ:EJ:IT ~ _ I ' ~ ¡c ,,: :: ..:. . . 1"[_ ¡ . I _I_I 7"~' l -1: 'I' 'I 'I 'I' :1, T-;ï;I 0, "" E _ _ ~ c . ¡ ..; ~' I '1 + I ,¡ ,i ; ; ¡ ~ ; e-::.;J ~ ' I ¡I ¡I ¡I ¡ 1'1 ¡ 1 ¡ ; I ~ I: i : ' ,I ·1.... ~ 1- ::"~ -I ~:w~ W¡OODVIEW!. L-J~~ -7- 1.1..1 ~ . ¡""" T^'~"" ~ <: ' ¡ 'I ¡ I ¡ ~ '.' ,j ,: _ :' .1,,1.1.(, ,I-;-'æ--;-' ~, .... .. -I-I';'V' ':' ,."'., o \ ~ i ¡ . 0 I : ;; :: I :1 _ "I--- -::- ~ I ~ - Ie: : I; 1- - ;. . .. - - ~. 1-,""- .-'- - .,_. .. ::r '$ ~ ~._ ,-L ~ ~ .j" I '" ~ I· .1 - Sd- ~ ,H=- S· ¡¡; ;1::/; ·1 ¡¡ :: ;;: -;' ~--.; .'0 D( '% ~ ~ \ : ,\ .1 ../ ::1 ;;: I ;;: i : I.: - : ,: -:-' , ,.' -- -=- ...;.. 8\ I Î ~ ~. -.. 0 w·:: :; ~ - ~ _ _ SPIING "'1"00 '_ , " , f-- .. ~ .. W ~ ~I . .. .. .. . " ' _ ~l .' -.... -=--., .' \ ¡;: c ~ - ¡ I.. .. "1--:', ;;::- "~'" . ~ ßS2~ g" ;¡¡ !II .. ~\ '" ~ 'l(AiANT "fA --' :: ~~~~ 'õ ~ - n ); .. ~ ';0: -' DOW ~ ' , .. .., ;.. - .. . " o .'.." .. .. . 1 " ."" . - .. 1- .. .~O O~ ~ . ..... ,:"' 1. 1-" , ,7 · ..' .".., ".". ,. ~ .. ' -'- ~ ~ ~ .~- - , .... ...... ... I.. - ~7";I~ i ¡;:- ..N~ - ",,!, I L- I "'.... I ~ I lH ""'" I-' ..... ;; () ! I - ~ . 61"¡;¡J 6800 C) 1- !IO " .. .. C) . I c¡ R I ex: ex: ex: ex: ex: ex: ex: ex: .. 18 ex: ex: 0 10 D ~ 19A2 !I 0 .-4 .-4 N .-4 N .-4 .-4 N ID- 1f ~ .,,"~<! :: -N N N N- ex: ex: a: a: a: a: ,... ID If) If) ~ ~ n .. . . . .. ~ c:::::s ~ ACE 7 ex: 4A1 W W~~~'{ 10 W 6 '0 X StJ 1606 I~ en A- 5 l1J 4A2 0 LL :J ex: 3 2 1 C) C) ~ 1 6700 MEADOW CREST DR : 3 6, 7 8 ex: 0 6 7 ex: 2A-1R UJ ( ) X H -.J X 1 H UJ ~ -.J JAC 3 3 2A-2R 2 2 <) 5 <) ~ <) ~ 1 1 <) ... 10 to ;40 LEWIS DR 6700 6800 4 " 1R 5 . N r the use of mes no responsibility han the use intended. w E FEET P fETERS ~ .ç: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Request of Daniel G. Ham for Short Form Final Plat of Lot 1 R1, Agenda Number: PS 96-30 Block 1, McKee Addition. (Located at 7612 Shady Grove Road) Denied at the October 28, 1996 meeting Mr. Daniel Ham is the owner of a 1.13 acre tract of land located in the extreme northern part of the city on Shady Grove Road. Mr. Ham has submitted a short form plat of the property as a prerequisite to the construction of a new home. The property being platted consists of a portion of Lot 1, Block 1, McKee Addition, and a small unplatted tract. There is an existing mobile home situated on the unplatted portion of the tract. The following are the major items regarding this Short Form Final Plat. Other comments are included in the attached engineering comments letter. 1. Access The original McKee Addition was platted in 1983 and consists of a single lot with an existing single family structure and a mobile home situated on the property. Mr. McKee owns and operates a small private water system on Shady Grove Road; adjacent to the mobile home is a metal building which appears to be in use as a maintenance shop for the water system. Access to the building, mobile home and single family residence is via an undedicated dead-end private drive known as Davis Road. The private road is actually situated on land owned by BH&L Joint Venture, and the road has existed at least since 1983. The drive also serves another single family residence which is not a part of this plat. Approval of the plat as proposed will divide the balance of the original McKee Addition and leave the four structures with no legal access. However, this situation has existed in this condition for a number of years and no changes to Davis Road are being proposed at this time. 2. Zoning The property is zoned AG Agriculture. At the October 28, 1996 City Council meeting, the property owner was directed to submit a rezoning application to change the zoning from AG Agriculture to R-1-S Special Single Family Residential. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning requests at its November 14,1996 meeting. 3. Sanitary Sewer Service Access to public sewer service is beyond the 300 foot distance required for connection. The applicant intends to utilize the existing septic tank system for domestic sewage disposal or upgrade if deemed inadequate by the Tarrant County Health Department. ~ Planning and Zoning Commission recommends a covenant signed by the owner to connect to the public sewer when it becomes available in the future. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available 16 ,Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM PS 96-30, Page 2 . 4. Fire Coverage There is an existing fire hydrant on the north side of Shady Grove Road, but it is physically located within the city limits of the City of Keller. The subdivision regulations require the applicant to install a new fire hydrant on the south side of Shady Grove Road to provide adequate fire protection for the property. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the developer install the fire hydrant. but to work with the Public Works Department about having city crews install the hydrant. The fire hydrant has been installed. 5. Thoroughfare Plan Shady Grove Road is designated as a C2U on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. A C2U requires an ultimate right of way width of 60 feet. The developer is dedicating 11.5 feet of right of way for Shady Grove Road. 6. Street Improvements Shady Grove Road is presently unimproved with curbs, gutter and sidewalks. The Subdivision Regulations require the developer to improve one half of the road or escrow funds for its future construction. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the owner sign a covenant for the street and sidewalk improvements. 7. Street Lighting The Subdivision Regulations require the developer to install a street light at this location. There is no cost to the applicant for TU Electric to install a light on the existing electrical pole. The Planning and Zoning Commission requested that the applicant provide the City documentation that a street light was requested at this location. . The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this Short Form Final Plat at its October 10, 1996, meeting and recommended approval subject to the following: a covenant for street and sidewalk improvements; a covenant for tying into the sewer system when service is available; the fire hydrant be required; the owner provide documentation from TU Electric that a street light was requested; and the applicant request rezoning to an appropriate residential district. RECOMMENDA TION: It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. . . . - P&Z Minutes - Page 2 10 October 1996 4. PS 96-30 REQUEST OF DANIEL G. HAM FOR SHORT FORM FINAL PLAT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, MCKEE ADDITION. (LOCATED AT 7612 SHADY GROVE ROAD) APPROVED Mr. LeBaron stated the tract is 1.1 acres in size. He stated the property is zoned AG Agriculture. He stated the owner proposes to use the existing septic system. He stated staff feels a covenant should be signed to require a connectton to the sanitary sewer system when it is available in the area. Mr. LeBaron stated a fire hydrant is required. He stated the owner is requesting a covenant to cover street improvements to Shady Grove Road. Mr. Davis stated the applicant has agreed to a covenant for street and sidewalk improvements, as well as tying into the sewer system when available. Mr. Bowen stated the Commission should require the fire hydrant. Mr. Davis stated it is necessary to see that adequate fire protection is available for all properties since it would affect the insurance coverage on the new house. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 96-30 subject to the following: a covenant for street and sidewalk improvements; a covenant for tying into the sewer system when service is available; the fire hydrant be required; documentation from TU Electric requesting a street light; and the applicant request rezoning to an appropriate residential district. The motion was seconded by Mr. Owen. The motion carried 5-0. 5. PS 96-32 Mr. LeBaron sta stated the owner is behind the approved spec requirements have been met. property is 4.25 acres in size and is zoned C-1 Commercial. He the tract into two lots. He stated this plat is following permit for City Garage. He stated all engineering Mr. Davis asked if the plat should sho Mr. Kevin Miller, Assistant Director of Public the special use permit required only one approach, show it on the plat. came forward. He stated since does not feel it is necessary to Mr. Miller made the motion to approve PS 96-32 subject to e The motion was seconded by Mr. Nehring. The motion carried 5- CITY OF N$RTH RICHLAND HILLS · Public Works September 9, 1996 MEMO TO: Barry LeBaron Director of Planning and Inspection Services FROM: Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: PS96-30; MCKEE ADDITION; Block 1, Lot 2; Final Plat · We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on August 16, 1996. The following items are for your consideration. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OUTSTANDING ITEMS, WE FEEL THAT THIS PLAT SHOULD NOT BE PLACED ON AGENDA FOR P & Z CONSIDERATION. 1. There are several requirements for a Short Form Final Plat as defined in the Article 7 of the Subdivision Regulations. Section 710 requires that all utilities required to serve the lot are in place or arrangements to provide same have oeen made with appropriate easements shown on the plat. The existing location of water and sewer has not been provided. The City Grid Maps indicate there is a water line located on the south side of Shady Grove Road. No sewer lines are shown on the proposed lot or on adjacent lots. Sewer does not appear to be available. This will need to be addressed prior to the plat being placed on the P & Z agenda. 2. Subdivision Regulations Section 250 requires the subdivided area to have a minimum of 50' of contiguous frontage on and access to an existing public street, or an acceptable public access approved by the P & Z Commission, and such access meets the minimum street construction requirements contained in the Design Manual. The existing Lot 1 will be split into 3 pieces. The remaining portion of Lot 1 to the south of Lot 2 does not meet this requirement. 3. The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication. In addition, the surveyor's seal and signature need to be added to the plat prior to the plat being filed. · P.O. Box 820609 . North Richland Hills, Texas. 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820·817-581-5521. FAX 817-656-7503 · 4. The proposed lot designation, 1 R1 needs to be changed to Lot 2 and the title block needs to be revised as shown. There are 2 remaining portions of Lot 1 which are not contiguous. Since the remaining portions of Lot 1 are not included in this plat, they will remain designated Lot 1. 5. The master plan for the City indicates the need for a 10 inch water line from Shady Grove Road, south along the east property line. 6. The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 7.5 foot utility easement along the rear property line. Additional utility easements may be required along the east and west property line. This will be addressed when items #1 and #5 are resolved. 7. The current zoning along with building setback lines need to be added for the proposed lot as well as the adjacent lots. · 8. Based on the Design Manual, residential lot grading shall be conducted in a manner which will not allow runoff to cross more than (2) lots (including the lot on which the drainage originates) before it enters a street or drainage easement. The replat of Lot 2 does not meet this requirement. An approved engineered grading plan will be required prior to building permits being issued. The grading plan will need to show a swale draining south-north along the east property line to intercept the runoff before it reaches the adjacent property. 9. This plat fronts on Shady Grove Road. Shady Grove Road needs to be improved to provide curb and gutter along the south right-of-way. The Subdivision Ordinance requires that the Developer provide his portion of these improvements or place $14,482.17 in escrow for future improvements by the City. A covenant may be requested in lieu of the escrow, but would require City Council approval. 10. The Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. If and when the property is developed, the sidewalk will need to be constructed. 11. A topographical drawing (separate from the plat) is required by the Subdivision Ordinance. This drawing needs to include contours as well as IDl existing underground utilities. 12. Street lighting is required by Section 1-06 of the Design Manual. The locations of any existing street lights need to be shown on the plans to confirm compliance with current ordinances. Any additional street lights which may be required based on current ordinances need to be coordinated with Public Works and TU Electric. The cost for installation of any additional street lights will be paid by the developer directly to TU Electric. · · 13. The Design Manual contains criteria for necessary fire hydrant coverage. All existing fire hydrants need to be shown on the topographical drawing. Appropriate coverage radii for the applicable fire hydrants also need to be included. This will assist Public Works in determining the need for additional fire hydrants. It appears from the City Grid Maps that a fire hydrant will need to be installed by the developer of the lot. This review was based on the Short Form Final Plat submittal. TFïé submittal does not meet the requirement of a short form plat. The necessary information should be included with an application for a replat of Lot 1, Block 1, McKee Addition. The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. ~ß~L_ Kevin B. Miller, P.É. Assistant Public Works Director · KBM/smm/pwm96114 cc: Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Public Works Director · · · · <'" :---..;;~-:.:::.:.. / _ r----. , . David C. l\!oak-Surveyors, Inc. Registered Professi~~al Land Surveyors '<:. ~·2_·";::'~::---''''' David C. Moak. R.P.L.S. Consultant Texas . New Mexico . Arizona . Nevada David W. Myers, R.P.L.S. President September 16, 1996 City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Attn: Clayton Husbands/Kevin Miller Re: PS 96-30 McKee Addition Final Plat Public Works review comments: 1) The water line in Shady Grove Hoad has been added to the plat and our client has intentions of utilizing the existing and/or installing a new septic system to take care of the sanitary sewer for the new home; 2) The south portion of Lot 1 that will become a seperate tract upon filing of this plat has the same access as the McGilvray tract to Davis Ibad which has been in use for apparently a long time and is not marked as a private drive. 3) The seals and signatures will be added to the plat prior to filing. 4) The lot designation has been changed to Lot 2 as requested. 5) The only reason our client decided to replat their tract was due to their desire to replace the existing mobile home with a brick home. 1b require them to install a 10" water line the full depth of their property would probably destroy their hopes for improving this single lot. Therefore, we request you to reconsider this item. 6) We have changed and/or added 7.5' utility easements along the south, west and east lines as requested. 7) The current zoning and building lines have been added as requested. 8) An engineered grading plan will be provided at the time of request for a building permit. 9) We request a covenant in lieu of the escrow for Shady Grove Road improvements for the same reason as item 5. 10) A sidewalk will be constructed at the time of building the new home, if requested to do so even though no other walks will exist in the area. 11) We have added the contours, improvements and any underground utilities we have knowledge of to the Plat and will remove them from the plat after review is complete and prior to filing with the Cbunty Clerk, if requested to do so. 12) No street lighting exists in this area. 13) We have added the nearest fire hydrant to the plat and it is within approximately 370' from the furthest point of the existing home. Should you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, \ 105-B Bedford Rd. . Bedford. Texas 7 Mapping . Fax (817) 282-040 I David W. Myers Member Texas Society of Professional Surveyors & American Congress on Sun ................ -- ......... ... .CITY OF N@RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works -October 3, 1996 MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: PS96-30; MCKEE ADDITION; Block 1, Lot 2; Final Plat . We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on September 19, 1996. The following items are for your consideration. 1. The location of existing water and sewer service has not been provided. The applicant has shown the location of the 16" waterline, but has not addressed if the water service is in place or if not in place where the water service will be located. The surveyor has indicated that their "client has intentions of utilizing the existing and/or installing a new septic system ...". The location of the existing septic system has not been shown. The size of the existing septic system will need to be approved by the county and percolation tests will be required prior to issuing building permits. Refer to the Design Manual Section 1-03, Subsection E, Paragraphs 1-4 for additional information regarding septic systems. Shady Oaks Second Filing has been constructed. The closest available sewer appears to be located at the northwest corner of this addition. Shady Oaks Fourth Filing has been platted but not yet constructed. The current plans indicate the sewer will be constructed to the northeast corner of this lot at some time in the future. When that occurs, sewer will be less than 300 feet from the proposed lot. A covenant should be obtained with this plat which would commit this property to extending sewer along Shady Grove Road to the northwest corner of the proposed lot. In addition this lot should be required to connect to City water at this time and to the City sewer when the extension is installed. . P.O. Box 820609 . North Richland Hills, Texas. 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 ·817-581-5521 . FAX 817-656-7503 · · 2. Subdivision Regulations Section 250 requires the subdivided area to have a minimum of 50' of contiguous frontage on and access to an existing public street, or an acceptable public access approved by the P & Z Commission. Such access must meet the minimum street construction requirements contained in the Design Manual. It appears there has not been right-of-way dedicated nor an access easement granted. The city has not accepted Davis Road as a City street. The street does not meet the City's minimum street construction requirements and is not currently an acceptable public access. The Developer needs to include a 50 foot wide public access easement on the proposed Lot 2 oLprovide evidence of dedicated public access on the private drive known as "Davis Road". 3. Public Works has reviewed the need for a 10" water line on this tract. Shady Oaks Fourth Filing is immediately east of the lot and is a better location for the future water line. 4. The tract adjacent to the east was previously platted. These lots need to be shown along with the building set back lines. 5. The Plat indicates property is currently zoned "Agricultural." The property will need to be rezoned residential prior to construction of the residence. R-1-S is sometimes used under these circumstances. 6. The surveyor's response (9-16-96) indicated the owner has agreed to provide an engineered grading plan with his application for a building permit. The grading plan will need to be approved prior to building permits being issued. The grading plan will need to show a swale draining south-north along the east property line to intercept the runoff before it reaches the adjacent property. 7. This plat fronts on Shady Grove Road. Shady Grove Road needs to be improved to provide curb and gutter along the south right-of-way. The Subdivision Ordinance requires that the Developer provide his portion of these improvements or place $14,482.17 in escrow for future improvements by the City. The applicant has requested a covenant in lieu of the escrow. 8. The Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. The applicant has agreed to build a sidewalk if requested. If a covenant is allowed for street improvements, it could include the sidewalk. 9. A topographical drawing (separate from the plat) is required by the Subdivision Ordinance. The topography was shown on the same drawing as the plat. This will need to be separate prior to the plat being filed. 10. Street Lighting is required by Section 1-Q6 of the Design Manual. The surveyor has indicted there are no existing street lights. The owner needs to request installation of a street light on the existing power pole at the northwest corner of the lot. The cost for the installation of the additional street light will be paid by the developer directly to TU Electric. · . . . 11. The Design Manual contains criteria for necessary fire hydrant coverage. A fire hydrant has been shown on the plat approximately 370 feet west of the property. The fire hydrant on the north side of Shady Grove Road belongs to the City of Keller. The developer will need to install a fire hydrant on the City of North Richland Hills' 16" water line. This review was based on a the plat and topographical information submitted. There are a few comments which have been added to the blueline. The marked-up blueline will need to be returned with the next submittal. ~,~ ....Kevin B. Mille(P.E. Assistant Public Works Director KBM\pwm96125 cc: Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Public Works Director Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning and Inspection Services .ltJl t),;'u .L. :1.::10 ~~. ~v ':'..1. ( - _0_ -U....Ù.i. r'lUHh ::JU/':Vt. YU/':::J lHI.- r-l4l.Jc:. tJo:; .:~ David C. oa neyors, Inc. Ilcaistered J.1f~5S _..' Land Surveyors · David W. Myers, R.P.L.S. Pre.lden( Ck:tober 03, 1996 · Acru,c · TopogtAphy · Subdivisions · Loan Surveys · Invcsti,aclve Surveys · Construction Layout Dltvid C. Moak. R.P.L.S. Consullant Texl'ls . New Mexico . Arizona . Nev¡¡da City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North RiChland Hills, Texas 76180 Attn: Clay too B1sbands/Kevin Miller Re: PS 96-30 ~Kee Addition Final Plat (October 3, 1996 Conment ~tter) Public ~k8 additional review comments! · 4) 5) 7) 9) 10) 1) The existing mobile home is currently served with water by a private -McKee- water syst.atI and the new hane will be utilize the Sëlltle service and the existing septic system will also be used for the new hane; Testing will be done, if required; 2) I can only prea\.lt\e that sane degree of prescriptive rights exists if no other recorded proof exists pertaining to the dedication and use of Davis 1Ðad by adjacent property owners; Should a 20 foot access aas4It\ent be required to provide record access to the two tracts in question, it will be considered as part of the site plan and how it will affect the building area: The newly platted lots east of our site will be researched and added to the plat upon our next submittal; o.u- client ~uld prefer to keep the current zoning simply due to area and that they have horses; 'lb rezone may cause certain limitations for there proposed use; The client is still planning on a covenant in lieu of escrow for street improvements; The topographic information will be taken off of the final plat upon approval and prior to filing, The client feels no need for one single light, however, if one light is required, it will be discussed with TU: 11) The cost for the installation of the proposed fire hydrant will be considered prior to agreement to installation , Should you have any further questioos or concerns, please do not hesitate to call. · '\ ~ Dav RPLS IO~-B Bedford Rd. · B~d(ord. TeÄa5 76022-6208 · Metro (817) 268-2211 . Fax (817) 282-0401 Member Tøu Socl~y or Pror...lonal SllfV."or. " "",..lean Conarcsl on S""'CJtll' " Mappln. Ni:tH APPLICATION FOR A SHORT FORM FINAL PLAT City of North Rlchland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 620 North Richland Hills, TX 617·561·5515 . (PI.... P'V'C 'fO'6 '_01 Propo$4 d Subdivision Name: L \ Current Legal Description: -=ß,E.) ~~ A ?oi<.T'OI~ OF loT \) ßLOc:.~ ) ,. 1V\<:-)L.Et À,I:>D) .\0 ~ A~ 0 ß~I N~ T\..4A""\ S~f'I\E \~c..... b€Sc..R.,&::o \ã L )'S \:)A~~ M<..\o(.2E: HAM 4,~o \-\\.l"SÒÄ~D DÄ~ I E:.L G:.>R:c::c~ ~ \ V Ot.... \ 2..4 1='6. i~C:: D. R.T. c.:;:"\ Name and Address of Current Property Owner: llSA DAN~ ty'~"-EE \-\AM -\ ~~ €L C:,o¡;z,<::x::>¡...j \-4f.:dY) "l <.c 1 z. 'S \-\40'( <:::-~\Ib l<D~c \-..b;:<"1"\-\ R I c.. \-\ \~D \-\, L LS I-X I Name and Address of Previous Owner: (ff purchasBd during pasltwelve monlhs) Phone No. ì ~ C)-, S I Name and Address of Developer: SÀfVì'f:: As. o\b)Ñ~ Phone No. Name and Address of ~ c:; Ù Q..V~o~ ~ L::>A'V \ C c... \V)öAK '£.LH~.VE,(v~, H'~c.../ DAv 10 w. M,(~ \ oC c:;, ~f=oR.O 1<.0 Au ß'E~~") -rSX4S, -, <..:.<::>'2..z. Short Form r/lJaf Pfal Application FH: Phone No. G<O~ 2.2. \ \ 1. Application fH: 2. Numb" of residential Iols 0 51.50 per lot \ $120.00 \.SO 3. Number of non·residential acres 0 55.00 per acre: 4. Numb" of slreel inlersection signs 0 $65.00 each: 5. County pfal reccrding fee: - - Total fee: '3 ~,C:('.> \1' .SO I hereby cerlify Ihall am, or represen~ the legal owner of Ihe property descrIbed above and do hereby submit this ShOrl Form Finaf PIal 10 lhe Pfanning and Zoning Commission for consideration. Date: å- / ~-9ft Applicanrs Phone No.: 7 3' ð" - 9 '7~ ') I (8-1 '7 ) Your name (Printed Name): p /).Ah' ~ G.. Nil t'Y/ Signalure: Note: Please complete and submit the 'Short Form Final Plat Document Submittal Checklist' on the reverse side of this form. r~ ~ (p-.:50 SHORT FORM FINAL PLAT CD ·404 (5·94) ZION 'f94 yg17 ufflormoV2ISN o C' r *,,s7-: a A I lir* 4,0Nl03 CO a i331S ,.2'5 ) a a\ x ZT. (Ci _ j_1 m b 'S ONn03 0021 1331S „BSS sS I 'tiZ 1 M QO ,g1 .68 N \\I 4) , S0 .LNSNgSKY A.LI711111 9'4 c` 6,9 K E T � L x •/, ' eN H 1?" K �I`/ x x 6 .,_......L V 1 .. v I N 111 .." ) . n :bl. rn to CO C ID 2B9 c �` zz z �_ tiip x m �' Z D{ .-. m --I .ZO7 N D m —I O D I Fri. ,� D m .9 d. 031VOZ r' _ m 38,9V 6gfI ' 1 E-A c N Ni 0-4 CO E 41-4-r �= Rl O�n03 0021 73315 „8, � ^n x '1 '0'1 '8'd S9T 39tid '6EfZT 3wn"IOn • __ WHH 002109 13 I NFIQ • 'QNtiHSnH QNd W 33N3W 3113NtiQ S I 1 �Z G7 01 032I S30 1Jti211 n sT: I -4 I ` T xoorlg soz d7 D6 rd1q . ■1511■■■■■■■ 3Q .S'L x 1111■■•■■■■■ 0 Or ii m W c 9• 1._ 0370- 1HOI1 (0 A o '310- 3JIna3S -4 c. (N •< 9T - x £ ( D Io3 E C I . m s -c-c: z m 0d n213S _ 1 0 x'37 N(0 �� 3Ntid0 d _ 9'E; U x • co / / ■ o / / 3N i I 9 Q 7 t nfl ,OS C _ 1HOI 1'M 310- 313S I `' 1H9 I 4.1 3'10 30 I nb3S I Ii .1 o I l?c -�,f nxnc vNnu (71 •1 242 1 --' , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Request of Linda Owen for Replat of Lot 1 R, Block 33, College Hill Addition. (Located in the 6100 block of Davis Blvd) Agenda Number: PS 96-31 Linda Owen is the owner of a small tract of land located west of Ross Road and immediately behind the old Vehicle Emissions Testing facility on Davis Boulevard. The owner has submitted a Replat of the property for development as a potential commercial lot. The replat would create one lot. The following are the major items regarding this Replat. Other comments are included in the attached engineering comments letter. 1. Zoning The property is currently zoned C-2 Commercial. The owner has not identified a user for the property. 2. Ross Road Improvement When the vehicle testing facility was constructed in 1993, the City Council agreed to abandon Ross Road rather than require its improvement as a public street. The developer proposes to utilize the abandoned Ross Road right-of-way to accommodate the parking lot for the new commercial development. A public access easement, a drainage/utility easement and fire lane will remain in the place of the Ross Road right-of-way. 3. Drainage/Grading Plan A drainage and grading plan is required prior to the issuance of building permits. The Public Works Department has concerns about how the developer will handle the parking lot runoff. 4. Building Setbacks The Ross Road right of way will be retained as a public access easement, fire lane and drainage/utility easement. The developer is requesting a 20 foot building line, rather than the 25 foot building line required for C-2 properties, to maximize the available space on this peculiar shaped lot. The developer has responded to all engineering comments. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this Replat request at its November 14, 1996, meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available eu ~~~ger ,Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I . 4. PS 96-31 REQUEST OF LINDA OWEN FOR REPLA T OF LOT 1 R, BLOCK 33, COLLEGE HILL ADDITION. (LOCATED IN THE 6100 BLOCK OF DAVIS BOULEVARD) APPROVED Mr. Barfield stated he was moving this item up from the end of the agenda so the developer wouldn't have to sit through the entire meeting. Mr. Barfield asked the staff to explain this item. Mr. LeBaron explained this is a small commercial tract, zoned C-2, located at the intersection of Ross Road with Davis Boulevard. The site included a portion of Ross Road, which is to be abandoned as a portion of this plat. He stated that the developers surveyor was in the audience to answer any questions. Mr. Gary Curtis came forward to answer questions. There were none. Mr. Owen stated that since he has a conflict of interest in this plat, he would abstain from the questioning and voting of this item. . Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PS 96-31, as presented and a statement be placed on the plat requiring drainage and grading plans as a condition to obtaining a building permit. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Spicer, and the motion carried 4-0 with Mr. Owen abstaining. PZ BLlC HEARl 0 CONSIDER THE R EST OF DANIEL G. HAM TO NE TRACT 2C, CK SURVEY, ABST T 1210; AND A PORTION 1, BLOCK 1, MC ADDITION, FROM A GRICUL TURE )TO R- L SINGLE FAMIL.: SIDENTIAL). (LOC GR ROAD) Chairman Barfield ope 'n favor to come forward. avor of the request. the public hearing an ed those wanting to Ham, the property own Chair Barfield asked that anyon this zonin equest come forward. . There being no Mr. Barfield closed the pub motion to approve 6-27, as presented. The Spicer. The motion ca 5-0. earing. Mr. Owen made 'on was seconded by Mrs. 2 . CITY OF N$RTH RIC~~:::ND HILLS September 23, 1996 MEMO TO: Barry LeBaron Director of Planning and Inspection Services FROM: Julia W. Skare, P.E. Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS96-31; COLLEGE HILL ADDITION; Block 33, Lot 1 R1; Replat We have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on August 29, 1996. The following items are for your consideration. DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OUTSTANDING ITEMS, WE FEEL THAT THIS PLAT SHOULD NOT BE PLACED ON AGENDA FOR P & Z CONSIDERATION. . 1. An outstanding invoice for $8,000 is due the City prior to sale of this property. In August, 1994 Owen Industries, Inc., the Owner of Lot 1R, Block 33, College Hill Addition entered into a City/Owner Agreement and Covenant with the City for the amount of $8,000 to cover a portion of the cost for sanitary sewer service improvements. 2. A site plan is required with the next plat submittal. In previous discussions with the Director of Public Works, the drive approach off of Davis Boulevard would be at a 90 degree angle and end with a cul-de-sac on Lot 1 R. This will need to be addressed prior to the plat being placed on the P & Z agenda. 3. A topographical drawing is required by the Subdivision Ordinance. This drawing needs to include all permanent above ground features as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. The drawing needs to include but not limited to pavement, buildings, poles, sidewalks and contours. The drawing also needs to indicate sill existing underground utilities. 4. The Design Manual contains criteria for necessary fire hydrant coverage. All existing fire hydrants need to be shown on the topographical drawing. Appropriate coverage radii for the applicable fire hydrants also need to be included. This will assist Public Works in determining the need for additional fire hydrants. . 5. The proposed easements will need to be clearly labeled as shown on the blueline. P.O. Box 820609 . North Richland Hills, Texas. 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820·817-581-5521 . FAX 817-656-7503 . . . 6. The preliminary drainage analysis is not required at this time. The preliminary drainage analysis will be required with the building permit. 7. The Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. If and when the site is developed, the sidewalk will need to be constructed. 8. The title block needs to be revised as shown. The proposed lot designation, 1 RA needs to be changed to 1 R 1. 9. Building setback lines need to be added for the proposed lot 25 feet from the drainage and utility easement line. 10. The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication. In addition the surveyor's seal and signature need to be added to the plat prior to filing. 11. The plat is bordered by a State Highway facility. If the approach onto Davis Boulevard is to be reconstructed, a TxDOT Access Permit will be required for closing the existing entrance and construction of the new approach. The TxDOT permit application must be submitted to Public Works for approval prior to submitting to TxDOT. This review was based on the submitted Replat. The intention of this letter is to comment on items of significant importance to the general concept. A detailed review will be processed when the site plan and topographical drawing including utility location is submitted. There are a few comments recorded on a the blueline of the plat. This plat has been returned to the Surveyor for revision. The marked-up blue line will need to be returned with the next submittal. ~¿,k~ Jul" W. Skare, P. 6( St Engineer JWS\pwm96119 cc: Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Public Works Director . . . FROM Gerry CurtiS Associates, Inc. PHONE NO. 817 334 0381 P(! r, f. A. GERRY CURTIS ASSOCIATES, INC. SURVEYORS CJERAL.O A. (OEfl"Y) CURTIS RPL.8 III f 11111 nil I 15 October. 1996 Clayton Husband Planning and Zoning Office 0:".... .,-.. 11 n' II ,," lIill., T.II.. PO 00)( 820609 fort Worth. Texas 76182-0609 VIA FAX 581-5516 Re: PS 96-31; College HiH Addition. Block 33. Lot lR-A. Response to comments The following is our response to the staff comments after review of our plat submission. addressed in the same numbering system as your summary of 23 September. 1996. 1. According to the owner. City Hen wiH be paid at sale closing. contract for which Is cUtTently pending. 2. Site plan will be submitted with request for building permit. The geometry of the intersection of the access easement retained over abandoned Ross Road allows for a 90· drive approach radius at the south side of the approach; a realignment to public street standards is not feasible due to a large array ofTU tines at the south side of Ross Road which would require t'econstruct1on to allow for realignment. Vacnted Ross Road will serve only the adjacent properties and for emergency access. 3. Topographic map is being prepared and will be provided. along with other requested to be mapped. 4. Fire hydrant locations are shown on the topographic map to be supplied. 5. Easement labe.ls will be re-worlced as discussed. 6. Acknowledged. 7. Acknowledged. 8. Title block revised per request. 9. A 25 foct: setback line would severely impact the useable space on the site; staff has suggested a building setback line coincidental with the north easement line. 10. Acknowledged P.O. ... 'foU 1'0" \fIO"".T..a. .,8.4T-l... . . . FROM Gerry Curtis Associates, Inc. PHONE NO. 817 334 121381 R Response to støff requests, College Hill Addition, Lots I-RA, Block 33, page 2 11. Acknowledged. . CITY OF N$RTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works October 22, 1996 Gerry Curtis Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 9668 Fort Worth, TX 76147 RE: COLLEGE HILL ADDITION; Block 33, Lot 1 R1 Mr. Curtis: I am responding to your letter dated October 15, to Clayton Husband. In comment #2, you indicated a site plan would be submitted with the request for a building permit. A site plan needs to be submitted and reviewed prior to the plat receiving consideration from the P & Z Commission. The width of the existing ROW for Ross Road and the proposed access easement will need to be clearly indicated on the site plan. This will assist Public Works in verifying the location of easements, right of way, building set back lines and driveway approaches. . Comment #3 states the topographical drawing is being prepared. This topographical drawing is required by the Subdivision Ordinance. It needs to be a separate drawing and should include -ªÍl permanent above ground features as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. The drawing also needs to include but not limited to pavement, buildings, poles, sidewalks and contours. All existing underground utilities need to be shown on this separate topographical drawing. The Design Manual contains criteria for necessary fire hydrant coverage. All existing fire hydrants need to be shown on the topographical drawing. Appropriate coverage radii for the applicable fire hydrants also need to be included. This will assist Public Works in determining the need for additional fire hydrants. In comment #9 of your letter you state, "...staff has suggested a building setback line coincidental with the north easement line. The Public Works Department suggests the building setback line needs to be added for the proposed lot, 25 feet from and parallel to the drainage and utility easement line. If I can be offurther assistance, I may be contacted at 817-581-5521. ~JJr~ Julia W. Skare, P. E. Staff Engineer JWS\pw196291 . cc: Greg Dickens, Public Works Director Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning & Inspection Servi~s ' P.O. Box 820609 . North Richland Hif/s, Texas. 76182-0609 7301 Northeast Loop 820 ·817-581-5521 . FAX 817-656-7503 FROI'! Gerr'=i Cur·tiS ASSOcla.tes, Inc. PHONE NO. 817 334 0381 pal . GCA GERRY CURTIS ASSOCIATES, INC. SUIVEYORS .I:"""D II . .£Jt"Yt Ou..T I. "~L. .'7 I a... '0'.. 7 November, 1996 Ms. JUlia W. Skare. P.E. ~taff Enginetr . City of "'ortl1 Ricl1land Hills PO Bo~ 820609 Fort Worth, Te¡(8S 76182-0609 'f{hr~ : ~ -;" : ::-: ...- VIA FAX 656-7503 and Regular Mail " ~ ' ",:- Re: COLLEGE HIll ADDITION, Block 33. Lot lRl ~. . ".#' .. .". . . .' . . J;';1't;:~;~~!,~~; . . '.' '.' ., '''.:;'~'%.. '''"1.,.,.. . - :':<-<:::'5-;,: ,~,,;.t:,~c~.~~,.~:.. . Julia. ~ .. In response to your lett.r uf 22 October, 1996 concemlng the above ref"."ced proposed pl.t. we hereby respond as follows: . In the first p.ragraph uf your letter. you refer to. required ".¡Ie pl.n", Our und.rstandlng .t thi, time Is that this Is intc",ded to be II requiru! "grading and dnilnagell plan, We will furnish a grading and dreinage pia" a. soon .. po..ible. The owner pia", to cre.Ie . 61 foot wide parki"g lot with head·l" parkl"g on .ith.r side uf a 25 foot wid. drive ..... .nd fir. lane approxlm.t.ly centered on the existing Ross Road roadbed. A plal1 for this pan:íng .,nd drive õ1reð will be submitted shortly. \. ":'~.~'~~;:~-~.'~*~~>- Th. topogr.phic map .howing ..¡5ting utiliti.s .nd .>ei5ting fl... hydrant cover.ge WIIS handed to you In our mßeting on Tuesday of this M:elc. Please let us know If there Is 0.")' additional 'nfonnatlon required for that map. -. 'If . ";~~P:~::'_.' Th. .etback lin. cali.d for ha. b..n .grud to be ..t .t 20 f..t from the previous\y shown 33 foot wide drainage and vtility easement. This will be shown on Ol.lr plat. We .... p....um Ing that you 5ti II wI.h th. fi re lane f driveway to be I.bel.d "public acce.. ....m.nt". If this Is."ot the case, or that sltuatlo" n..d. to b. diocu_d fi.rth.r. pl.... .dvl.. a'soon .. possible. Thank you for your continuing ."¡sta"co In dealing with thi, probl.m piece af prop.rty. Pi..... califf you h..... ''''y question. .tall .bout thi. lett... or furth,reonc...... for the platting, ~ c: Charles Owen . It O. I.. .... ,." W.rt',Tu.. T'I~'..... NRH APPLICATION FOR A REPLAT City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 817-581-5500 . (Please print or type all responses) Proposed Subdivision Name: Lot IRA, Block 33 ~ollege Hill Addition, N. R. H., Texas Cu"entLegaIDescripüon: Loto lR, Block 33, College Hill Addition, N. R. H. ,Texas Name and Address of Current Property Owner: Linda L. Owen 6425 Martin Drive Phone No. 81 7 - 5 6 8 - 0 0 8 3 City View Electric Co 6000 C Old Hemphill Rd, Ft. Worth, Texas 76134 Name and Address of Developer: N. A. Phone No. Name and Address of Engineer: Gerry Curtis Associates, Inc. POBox 9668 Fort Worth, Texas 76147 Type of Development Being Proposed: o SF Residential Phone No. 817-334-0381 o Duplex Residential o MF Residential lKJ Commercial/Industrial o Other Application Fee: 1. Application Fee 2. Number of residential lots @ $1.50 per lot: 3. Number of non-residential lots @ $5.00 per acre 4. Number of street intersection signs @ $65.00 each 5. County plat filing fee: iZD~ lU. .kz.\ À,(, (çD~ TOTAL FEE I ßl !.l I hereby certify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the property described above and do hereby submit this Replat to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideraüon. (Attach affidavit with a/l property owner's names when more than one owner involved.) Date: Aygy~t 28, 1996 Applicant's Phone No.: 817-568-0083 Print Name: Linda L. Owen Signature: ~........~.../¿_ ~ ð2~ ) OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number f'SD¡fp·::\ Taxes Paid liens Paid Assessments Paid REPLAT CD ·403 (2196) ..a " 8 'IE "'f II sa :,6'D¿ Zet-06 :PP9 us - :JN17 H::J.L Y" ) ... HQ) \ ... >;. ".., ....00 . ~- :EoO ~\ \~ ~v .~~ '" . <ë .'" a ":'~ ,.." .... .. I :. ("I") '" / !! .41 001 i z I .0 ....~ ~ I C. 0 .. ~ 41 ,.... = Co. .eN I ('o LI- 0'" , ~ -.... U ! I V . c.= I O~ I ,..., . I .. .....;; 9t6l .. = c.= .. .... .- ~ 0.. = N~ ,.... .Oc. I . < Z:E 41 ., V~ = .. c:z = ~- c:Z ~O ON i¡¡ :: ,.... ! (J I ~ U ;.\ 0 "' « ~ iii :: ~ ! ~ Ii ~ I' i :: ~ II 2 Z ¡: = ... « « u ..;. ~ V 2 .; ~ = 0 Z = :) i ~ ~ 0 ª '" I I ~ I I ~ I i I ! a PIICI 01. ... .... ~ ... I = ... ... ... .. ... ,.... I U CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Consider establishing pool wastewater discharge and lot grading regulations for swimming pools. Tabled 11/11/96 Ordinance No. 2154 Agenda Number: GN 96-135 Attached is Ordinance Number 2154, which (1) establish regulations for the proper disposal of swimming pool wastewater, and (2) requires pool contractors meet certain drainage and lot grading standards. The ordinance has been modified since the last council meeting to incorporate a "Grandfather Clause" for existing pools. The City Council adopted swimming pool regulations in February 1995 which established standards for the operation of public and semi-public pools, such as those at motels and health clubs. However, current regulations for private swimming pools are inadequate and do not address proper disposal of swimming pool wastewater or pools constructed with little or no drainage consideration. Over the past several years, the City has relied on the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission's prohibition against illegal discharges by requiring pool wastewater discharges only through lines connected to the city sanitary sewer. Ft. Worth, Arlington, Piano, Dallas, Richardson, Carrollton and Irving are a few of the area cities that require similar sanitary sewer connection in lieu of discharging pool wastewater to the yard. Hurst allows homeowners to discharge pool water to the street. Ordinance 2154 establishes regulations which are consistent with practices used in North Richland Hills over the past several years. The proposed ordinance establishes new drainage and lot grading requirements for pool contractors. The City Council adopted lot grading requirements for newly constructed houses in July 1995. However, there are no similar requirements for pool contractors. Many drainage problems occur when swimming pools are constructed close to a side or rear property line and drainage flows are changed when the backfill is sloped all the way to the property line. The proposed ordinance will (1) require pool contractors to submit a proposed drainage plan showing how the lot will drain as a prerequisite to obtaining a building permit, and (2) prevent pool contractors from filling any property within two feet of a side or rear property line. For special conditions, the regulations allow a drainage plan prepared by a registered professional engineer to deviate from the established criteria. If approved, staff will schedule a workshop for area pool contractors to explain the new regulations. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance Number 2154. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~~~ ent Head Signature . Ci Y Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Fin..... Dnctor Page 1 of e _ e ORDINANCE NO. 2154 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC SWIMMING POOLS AND HOT TUBS 1 SPAS AND. PRIVA TE SWIMMING POOLS; PROVIDING FOR PERMIT FEES; PROVIDING FOR ANNUAL INSPECTIONS; AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has determined that the regulation of public and semi-public swimming pools and hot tubs / spas and private swimming pools is necessary for the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City, now, therefore, Be it ordained by the City Council of North Richland Hills, Texas that: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND APPLICABILITY Section 1.01 DEFINITIONS A. Certified Pool Operator - the person trained through an approved program, permitted and ultimately responsible for the safe sanitary maintenance of a public or semi-public pool or hot tub / spa on staff, per site. B. Free Chlorine Residual - the chlorine concentration, in milligrams per liter (mg/1) units of water, available for rapid and effective biocidal action. This is the chlorine which remains uncombined with nitrogenous or ammoniacal compounds after the initial chlorine demand of the water has been satisfied. C. Fee schedule - applicable fee set by the City Council of North Richland Hills. D. Hot Tub / Spa - therapeutic pool", hydrotherapy pool", whirlpool", hot tub", and similar type pools which are specifically designed to incorporate water iets and / or an aeration system to be used for hydro massage and which may not be drained, cleaned and refilled for each individual ,ad II'(/Ilch is in~~'1:':w~:,e used by the general public for therapy massage and is operated b r, lessee. C)perator, licensee or concessionaire. regardless of ;h;th;~ ~ ';e is charged for use. E. Lifeguard - an individual schooled and certified in an advanced course of instruction in lifesaving and water safety equivalent to that offered by the American Red Cross. - _ _ e F. Private Pool - any pool located on private, single-family residential property under the control of the homeowner or tenant, the use of which is limited to members of the homeowner's or tenant's family or invited guests. G. Public Pool - any pool, hot tub I spa or water slide which is intended to be used by the general public for swimming, bathing or other related purposes and is operated by an owner, lessee, operator, licensee or concessionaire, regardless of whether a fee is charged for use. H. Residential- pertaining to any structure or premises used for permanent living quarters of whatever type, including conventional single-family residences, duplexes, multi-family residences. I. Semi - Public Pool - any pool, hot tub / spa or water slide which is not included within the definition of either "Private Pool" or "Public Pool" as those terms are defined herein. J. Swimming Pool or Pool - any structure, basin, chamber or tank containing an artificial body of water for swimming, diving or recreational bathing and shall include water slides. K. Wadin.g Pool - A constructed or prefabricated pool used for wading which is less than twenty-four (24) inches in depth. L. Water Park - A facility consisting of multiple attractions including water slides, wave pools, children areas, endless rivers and various other attractions that differ from the traditional swimming pool complex. In order to qualify as a water park all attractions must be contained on one site. M. Water Slides - any recreational water slide flume designed to provide a descending ride into a splash-down pool at the base of the slide. Section 1.02 APPLlCABILlTY:_ These regulations shall apply to the following: A. All public or semi - public hot tubs and spas. B. All public or semi - public swimming pools, water parks, and water slides. C. All private pools over twenty-four (24) inches in depth or which contain more than two thousand (~OOO) gallons of water and are constructed after the effective date of this ordinance. EXCEPTION: The fencing and locking gate requirements shall be applicable to all pools. 2 _ _ e ARTICLE II PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC POOLS Section 2.01 PERMIT REQUIRED A. A person shall not operate a public or semi-public pool or hot tub I spa in the City of North Richland Hills unless and until a permit for such purposes has been issued by the Environmental Services Official or his/her designee. B. An application for such permit as required in this Article shall be made in writing to the Environmental Services Official or his/her designee upon forms prescribed and furnished by the City of North Richland Hills. C. An applicant must designate a Certified Pool Operator for each complex for which a permit is sought and the person designated as the Certified Pool Operator must be employed on the premises where the pool is located. D. Operational permits shall expire on April 30th of each year, unless suspended for cause before expiration date and must be renewed each year as described in this Section. E. Public pools which are owned and operated by the City or public schools must obtain an operational permit but shall be exempt from paying the application fee and the operational permit fee. Section 2.02 PERMIT DURATION AND RENEWAL: The permit shall be renewable on May first (1st) of each calendar year. Section 2.03 PERMIT FEE: The permit fee for a public or semi-public pool or hot tub I SI11l shall be one hundred ($100) dollars. Each public or semi-public pool or hot tub I SI11l shall require a separate permit. Section 2.04 INSPECTIONS: The Environmental Services Official is authorized to conduct such inspections as he/she deems necessary to ensure compliance with all provisions of this ordinance. He/she shall have right of entry at any reasonable hour upon the premises where a public or semi-public pool or hot tub I spa is located. He/she shall have the authority to collect water samples from the pool or hot tub I spa. Each public or semi-public pool or hot tub I spa shall be inspected by an Environmental Services official prior to use by the public for the swimming season. Section 2.05 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION A. Every public and semi-public pool or hot tub I spa shall employ a Certified Pool Operator, as provided in Section 3.01 above, who shall be responsible for compliance with all parts of this Article relating to pool maintenance, pool operation 3 e and safety of swimmers. It shall be unlawful for such Certified Pool Operator to cause or permit the existence of a condition which is in violation of any part of this Article. B. All pumps, pump rooms, filters, disinfectant and chemical feeders, drains, ladders, lighting, ropes and appurtenant equipment used in the operation of all public and semi-public pools or hot tub / spa shall be maintained in a good state of repair. C. All public and semi-public pools or hot tub / spa shall be treated and maintained in accordance with the following standards: 1. Every pool shall contain a disinfecting concentration of a minimum free chlorine residual of 1.0 mg/1. Every or hot tub / spa shall contain a disinfecting concentration of a minimum free chlorine residual of 2.0 mg/1. Use of any disinfectant other than chlorine must be approved by the Environmental Services Official. A test kit for measuring the concentration of the disinfectant, accurate within 0.2 mg/1, shall be provided at each pool/ hot tub / spa. _ 2. If cyanuric acid is used to stabilize the free available chlorine, or if one of the chlorinated isocyanurate compounds is used as the disinfecting chemical, the concentration of cyanuric acid in the water should be at least 30 mg/1, but shall not exceed 100 mg/1. A test kit should be available for measuring the concentration of cyanuric acid. 3. Every pool shall have water a pH of not less than 7.2 and not more than 8.0. A pH test kit accurate to the nearest 0.2 pH units, shall be provided at each pool. The total alkalinity of the pool water shall be at least 50 mg/1, but not greater than 150 mg/1. 4. The presence of organisms of the coliform group in any sample shall be deemed unacceptable water quality. 5. Every pool or hot tub / spa shall have water clarity sufficient for the main drain or a six inch (6") diameter turbidity test disk placed at the deepest part of the pool to be clearly visible. Failure to meet this requirement shall be sufficient cause for immediate closure of the pool or hot tub / spa. 6. Every pool or hot tub / spa shall be free of scum, and foreign floating matter, sediment, dirt, slime, algae and all other foreign material that may be conducive to the transmission of disease. e D. The recirculatory system of a public or semi-public pool or hot tub / spa must be in operation and properly maintained at all times. 4 e e - E. Water introduced into the pool shall be supplied through an approved air gap. Any other method of introducing water into the pool system must comply with the Uniform Plumbing Code of the City of North Richland Hills. F. Areas surrounding a public or semi-public pool, including bathhouses, dressing rooms, toilets, shower stalls and lounging areas shall be kept clean and in a state of good repair at all times. G. /\11 sv.(imming pool baok \\(ash and drainage shall be disposed of into the City sanitary water system through lines and equipment installed in aooordanoe with the Uniform Plumbing Code unless said water is to be used to reoyole as gmy '."later and for conservation purposes only. No baok 'Nash or drainage water may be pumped or drained directly to adjaoent public or pri~/ate property. Section 2.06 DRAINAGE OF POOL WA fER \ FIL fER BACKWASH No filter back wash or draina.ge water may be pumped or drained directly to the ground or onto adjacent property. All swimming pool back wash and drainage shall be disposed of by using one of the following procedures: A. Direct disposal into the City sanitary water system through lines and equipment installed in accordance with this code. or B. Recirculate filtered pool backwash directly into the pool after proper disposal of cartridge filter or similar type filtering system which has no water discharge, or C. Recycled as gray water for conservation purposes in a manner approved by the Public Works Director. Section 2.07 HEALTH AND SAFETY PROVISIONS A. All public pools, excluding hot tubs / spas, shall be attended by at least one (1) lifeguard during all hours of operation. B. The following safety equipment shall be readily available at all public and semi- public pools, excluding hot tubs / spas during all times they are open for use: 1. A life pole or shepherd's crook type of pole, having blunted ends, with a minimum length of twelve feet (12'); or a ring buoy of not more than fifteen inches (15") in diameter, to which shall be attached a throw line at least the length of the maximum width of the pool. 2. A guard line rope separating the shallow portion of the pool from the deep portion at the breakpoint depth. 5 _ _ e C. Semi-public pools, where no lifeguard service is provided, shall post in plain view at each entrance to the pool a warning sign which states "WARNING - NO LIFEGUARD ON DUTY", with clear, legible letters at least four inches (4") in height. In addition, the sign shall also state, "CHILDREN SHOULD NOT USE POOL WITHOUT AN ADULT IN ATTENDANCE". D. A sign shall be placed in distinct view of swimmers at all semi-public pools giving the emergency telephone number of the Police Department and the ambulance service or shall state the location of the nearest telephone and also state that emergency telephone numbers are posted at that location. At public pools, these telephone numbers shall be conveniently located at each telephone location. E. Depth markings must be visible at or above the water surface of the vertical pool wall and on the edge of the deck next to the pool, at maximum and minimum depth points, at points of break between depths and spaced at not more than twenty-five foot (25') intervals around the entire perimeter of the pool. Markings must be in numerals of minimum height of four inches (4"). F. A sign should be posted requiring a shower before using the pool. G. A sign should be posted at all public and semi-public spas warning that alcohol should not be consumed prior to or while using the spa. H. All chemicals used in swimming pool water treatment shall be stored in their original containers and kept in a cool, dry and well-ventilated place, out of the reach of children and should be kept in a locked room. I. The pool shall be surrounded by an approved wall or fence not less than six feet (6') in height with self-latching gates with locks at all entrances into the pool area. Said fence shall be kept in good repair, including areas adjacent and on the inside and outside of the fence. J. All pools and hot tubs shall be fitted with lIanti-vorlex" protection. Section 2.0S REGULATIONS IN POOL AREA A person commits an offense if he/she: A. Allows an animal under his/her control to enter or remain within the pool area or pool enclosure of a public or semi-public pool; or B. Has skin abrasions, open sores, skin disease, eye disease, nasal or ear discharge or a communicable disease and swims in a public or semi-public pool; or 6 e c. works at a public or semi-public pool while infected with a communicable disease; or D. alters or removes safety equipment from a public or semi-public pool except in an emergency; or E. carries glass within a public or semi-public pool area or enclosure. ARTICLE III PRIVA TE POOLS Section 3.01 HEAL TH AND SAFETY A. The pool shall be surrounded by an approved wall or fence not less than six feet (6' in height with self-latching gates with locks at all entrances into the pool area. Said fence shall be kept in good repair, including areas adjacent and on the inside and outside of the fence. However, a retractable ladder may be allowed on an above-ground pool when the building inspector has determined that substantial compliance with this safety requirement is satisfactory. e B. In the case of private pools that are abandoned or are allowed to become unsanitary rendering them unsafe for swimming or bathing. the City of North Richland Hills may require that the pool in question be secured with a cover approved by the Environmental Services Official. Should the owner or person in control of said pool not comply when ordered to do so by the Environmental Services Official, the City may choose to cover the pool in question and collect the cost incurred from the owner of the property on which the pool is located. Section 3.02 DRAINAGE OF POOL WA TER \ FIL TER BACKWASH No filter back wash or drainage water may be pumped or drained directly to the ground or onto adjacent property. All swimming pool back wash and drainage shall be disposed of by using one of the following procedures: A. Direct disposal into the City sanitary water system through lines and equipment installed in accordance with this code. or B. Recirculate filtered pool backwash directly into the pool after proper disposal of cartridge filter or similar type filtering system which has no water discharge. e 7 _ _ e ARTICLE IV REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL POOLS Section 4.01 SWIMMING POOL WASTEWA TER DISPOSAL No direct connection shall be made between any storm drain. sewer. drainage sy~tem: seepage pit, underground leaching pit and any line conn~cted to a sWimming pool or hot tub. When the wastewater is to be disposed of through a public sewe~ a minimum of th~e~ (3) inch P trap s.hall be required.. The tailpiece from the trap shall extend a minimum of three (~ Inches above finished grade and below finished floor grade. Traps need not be vented when located on the exterior of the building. The connection between the filter waste discharge piping and the P trap shall be made by means of an airgap. Section 4.02 SWIMMING POOL DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS This section shall establish building permit~ drainage and lot grading requirements for swimming pools and pool decks and no building permit or final ins.pection shall be approved unless the proposed pool and pool deck are in compliance with these regulations. A. All building permit applications for swimming pools and pool decking shall include a plot plan drawn to scale showing the following: 1. the limits of the proposed pool and pool decking, 2. any proposed landscaping wall or retaining wall, and 3. the existing drainage flows on all adjacent lots and the proposed drainage after completion of the proposed pool and pool decking. B. No pool deck shall be located nearer than two (~ feet to a site boundary or within any drainage or utility easement. C. Lots shall be graded to comply with the following: 1. All surface water to drain away from any pool or pool deck. 2. All grading plans to be consistent with the approved drainage plan for the subdivision. 3. The toe of any fill slope or top of any cut slope shall not be nearer to a side or rear property line than one half the height of the slope or cut. The minimum distance in this situation shall be two (~ feet. 4. No cut or fill shall be made within any drainage easement. S. No cut or fill slope associated with a pool or pool deck shall exceed a 3:1 t:iJ1& 6. The Building Official may require a retaining wall to maintain compliance with these drainage requirements. 8 _ D. The Building Official may approve alternate setbacks or drainage patterns when shown on a grading plan which has been pr~pared and sealed by a registered professional engineer. ARTICLE V ENFORCEMENT Section 5.01 FAILURE TO COMPLY A. Public and Semi - public Pools Failure to comply with any section of this ordinance may result in the immediate closure of the pool and/or the initiation of legal action. e 1. Upon determination that the pool does not comply with the provisions of this ordinance, the Environmental Services Official shall notify the Certified Pool Operator of the existing violations. If the Environmental Services Official determines that the condition of the pool is hazardous to the health or safety of the swimmers or of the general public, the pool shall be immediately closed. Signs shall be posted at all entrances to the swimming pool. Said sign shall be clearly visible to a reasonably observant person and shall state, "Closed by the North Richland Hills Environmental Service Department". A re-inspection of the pool will be conducted during the regular working hours of the Environmental Services Department at the request of the Certified Pool Operator. If compliance has been achieved, the Certified Pool Operator shall be notified that the pool may be opened. 2. Damage to or removal of said sign may result in the issuance of a citation to the manager of the property and/or the Certified Pool Operator. 3. When the Environmental Services Official has ordered that a pool be closed due to non-compliance with any provision of this ordinance, the owner of such pool shall not knowingly allow the pool to be used for swimming, diving or bathing purposes and shall immediately take every reasonable step to prevent the use of such pool for such purposes. By way of example and without limiting such duty, the owner shall (1) immediately post notices reasonably likely to come to the attention of potential users of the pool, advising of the closure and (2) shall immediately lock all gates and doorways in any fence or other enclosure surrounding such pool. e 4. Use of the pool by an individual for swimming, diving or bathing purposes after the Environmental Services Official has ordered such pool to be closed shall be deemed prima facie evidence that the owner of said pool has knowingly allowed the pool to be used for such purposes. 9 _ _ _ 5. Failure to comply with any section of this ordinance may result in the immediate closure of the pool and/or the initiation of legal action B. Private Pools In the case of private pools that are abandoned or are allowed to become unsanitary rendering them unsafe for swimming or bathing, the City of North Richland Hills may require that the pool in question be secured with a cover approved by the Environmental Services Official. Should the owner or person in control of said pool not comply when ordered to do so by the Environmental Services Official, the City may choose to cover the pool in question and collect the cost incurred from the owner of the property on which the pool is located. 5.04 ENFORCEMENT RESPONSIBILITY The Environmental Services Official, Building Official, or Chief Code Enforcement Officer, or their authorized representatives, shall have enforcement responsibility for this ordinance. ARTICLE VI SEVERANCE, REPEALER, PENALTY AND EFFECTIVE DATE Section 6.01 SEVERANCE That it is hereby declared that the sections, articles, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this ordinance are severable and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, subsection, article or section of this ordinance shall be declared void, ineffective, or unconstitutional by a valid judgment or final decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such voidness, ineffectiveness or unconstitutionality shall not effect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, subsections, article or sections of this ordinance since the same would have been enacted by the City Council with the incorporation herein of any such void, ineffective or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph subsection, article or section. Section 6.02 REPEALER Ordinance Number 2036 is hereby repealed and superseded by the adoption of this ordinance. Section 6.03 PENAL TV Any person, firm, association of persons, company, corporation or their agents, servants or employees violating or failing to comply with any of the provisions of any Health Article shall be fined upon conviction not less than one dollar ($1.00) nor more than two hundred dollars ($200.) And each day any violation of noncompliance 10 _ e e continues shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. The penalty provided herein shall be cumulative of other remedies provided by state law and the power of injunction as provided in Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. Art. 1175(f), (1) to (8) and as may be amended may be exercised in enforcing this article whether or not there has been a complaint filed. Section 6.04 EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from the date of passage and approval and publication as required by law: Passed and approved this Day of ,19_. Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City 11 ~ Department: Administration CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Local Law Enforcement Block Grant - Public Hearing Agenda Number: GN 96-140 On July 22, 1996, the City Council approved the City's Local Law Enforcement Block Grant application for the partial funding of a School Resource Officer (SRO). The City recently received notification from the U.S. Department of Justice that the grant application is approved in the amount of $34,676. One of the requirements of the Grant is a public hearing regarding the proposed use of the payment under the Local Law Enforcement Grant program. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council conduct the required public hearing. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available nature CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM ~ ~i.~ C' Y Manager Finance Director Page 1 of , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Consider Bid Award for Demolition of Structure at 3533 Sheridon Drive. Agenda Number: GN 96-141 On July 29, 1996, Code Enforcement staff initiated action to remove the dilapidated single family residential structure located on this lot. The house had experienced a severe fire and sufficient time had passed with no action taken by the property owner to either demolish or rebuild the structure. The North Richland Hills Board of Appeals met on November 7, 1996 to receive comments from adjacent property owners. Resolution Number 96-01 was approved by the Board of Appeals which authorizes the solicitation of demolition contractors and recommends the demolition of the dilapidated house. The City will bill the property owner for the costs of demolishing the house. After thirty days, if the property owner fails to pay the bill, a lien will be filed against the property. Bids were received from two contractors as shown below: Action Excavating, Inc. A TCO Construction $2,350.00 $2,975.00 Funding Source: Sufficient funds have been appropriated by the Council with the approval of the FY 97 Budget. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council award the contract to Action Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $2,350.00. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Account Number Sufficient Funds Available , ;Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ll/l1/~b lb: l~ t'\:I:¿ _ 'røpø.øa1 ComrnercIII & AelJdtntIlI , .. Action Excavating, Inc. \! PIopo..1 No. FROM (817) 572-DIRT Sheet No. Fed. LD..~2113114 P.O. Box 79085 Hoppy Lellherman D... u...... , 1 . Q. Saginaw, TX 76171 Metro (117) 572·3471 Proposal Submitted To Work To Be Performed.At ~fW: '1'ia fgrv.t~ Billa ~ y of Nor R~c land Str..t 51reet 7301 MR T~ 820 CIty _. Stat. eIy Uftr~h Ri~h1Aftd Rfll. 011. of Plana Stale 9A'II'A. '6180 Arch_eel Telephon. Number 581-5547 pazr 656-7$38 We hereby propose to ilmish all the materials and perform all the labor necessary for the COf11)Ietion of DeIIolish 3533 Sheridan Dr. Cl.ar lot. LAaVA a~y tre... $2,350 - OL D---li.h 6951 Crabtree Ln. ClAar 1ot. LAave any trAAA. S.,750.0L AI material is guaranteed to be as specified. and the above work to be per10nned in accordance w~h the drawings and specifications submitted lor above work and ~ed in 8 substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of DoIars ($ ). with payments to be made as follows: Due and payable ~n coapletion. Any a.eration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs. will be executed only upon written orders. and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes. accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire. tornado and other necessary insurance upon above wotk. Workmen'. Compensalion and Public Liability Insurance on above WOlk to be take out by Action Excavating Corporation. Inc. Respectfully submitted Action Excavating Corporation. Inc. Per~ ~1AP-1) Note - This proposal may be withdrawn by us it not accepted within _ days ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices. specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the wOft as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Accepted Signature D8fe Signature . _. _ e I , \,J y .. _ .." .." \ ..... ~ ~...,..... .~. _" '" ,., . ... ...... ... ...... I 11 ,.., I' I . I' ._" .t. --. .. ..... '.." - -. -. - _ ATCO CONSTRUCTION EXCAVATION & DEMOlITION P.O. BOX 1450e FORT WORTH, TEXAS 715117 TtIIphone 8171834-2056 F.. 817/834-41121 PROPOSAL I CONTRACt Date: November 11, 1996 City of North Richland Hills Attention: Tim Horvath lob Location: (A) 3533 Sheridon Drive (8) 6951 Crab Tree Lane Subject: House Demolition _ (A) 3533 Sheridon Drive-.... ......... ... ................ ... ..........................._$1,975.00 (B) 3651 CrabTree Lane....................................·.........··..·····..··......54,675.00 Inclusions: 1) All debris taken to an approved landfill site. 2) Dump Fees. 3) Owner has requested no salvage. 4) Rough grading only. Exclusions: 1) Additional fill material if needed. 2) Water, gas, sewer, electrical, or any other utility disconnect. 3) Clearing only. Trees I other, requires additional charge. 4) No fina1grading / rough cut only. Peñorming the above services......................................······..··..···..···S7 ,650.00 Payment 10 be made as follows: Due upon completiOll. Respectfully Submitted : Accepted by: ATCO Constructioll e _ RESOLUTION NUMBER 96-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BOARD OF APPEALS ORDERING THE DEMOLITION OF THE STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 3533 SHERI DON DRIVE AND AUTHORIZING THE SOLICITATION OF BIDS FOR ITS DEMOLITION. Whereas, the City of North Richland Hills has conducted a physical inspection of the premises located at Lot 34, Block 8, North Hills Addition, 2nd Filling, also known as 3533 Sheridon Drive, North Richland Hills, Texas, and prepared a description of the violation of municipal standards that are present in the building, and Whereas, the City of North Richland Hills has determined the structure located at 3533 Sheridon Drive to be dilapidated, substandard, and unfit for human habitation and a hazard to the public health, safety, and welfare, and Whereas, notice has been sent to the owner and all known lienholders of record ordering the building repaired or demolished, and _ Whereas, the City of North Richland Hills has conducted a public hearing to allow the property owner and all known lienholders the opportunity to submit a plan to comply with the Notice and Order issued by the Building Official. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION: Section 1. That, the structure located at 3533 Sheridon Drive, North Richland Hills, Texas is hereby ordered to be demolished. ~ Section 2. That, the Building Official is hereby instructed to obtain bids from a qualified contractor and recommend bid award to the City Council. This Resolution was considered by the Board of Appeals by the following vote, ~ for, -11- against, and ~ abstaining, on this 7th day of November, 1996. e Chairman, Board of Appeals CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: Canceling the December Regular Council Meetings and Agenda Number: Calling a Special December Council Meeting 11/25/96 GN 96-142 Subject: The consensus of the City Council at the October 14, 1996 Pre-Council Meeting was to cancel the December 23 Council meeting. It appears that because of the National League of Cities Conference there will not be a quorum for the December 9 Council meeting. Council needs to consider calling a Special Council meeting for December 16, 1996 to replace the two regular December Council meetings. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council call a Special Council Meeting for December 16, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev,) Sufficient Funds Av ilable Operating Budget _ ~';'¿fI~ . Department Head Signature ity Manager CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM Finance Director Page 1 of " CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Legal Council Meeting Date: Subject: Lone Star Gas Company Gate Rate Case Resolution No. 96-71 Agenda Number: 11/25/96 GN 96-143 Lone Star Gas Company has filed a Gate Rate case before the commission. If you approve this Resolution we will join Fort Worth, Arlington, and other cities in making certain that our views are presented. This cost is reimbursable but some "up-front" money will be required. Our current estimate is less than $2,500.00 Recommendation: It is recommended that Resolution No. 96-71 be passed. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number ufficient Funds Available Fin8nce Dnctor re CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM Page 1 of _ _ e RESOLUTION NO. 96-71 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS' INTERVENTION IN TEXAS RAILROAD COMMISSION GAS UTILITIES DOCKET 8647 AND RELATED DOCKETS AND CASES INQUIRING INTO THE RATES AND SERVICES AND OPERATIONS OF LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, AND AUTHORIZING THIS CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES IN HIRING LEGAL COUNSEL AND CONSULTANTS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH INTERVENTION. WHEREAS, the Texas Railroad Commission has initiated an inquiry into the rates, services and operations of Lone Star Gas Company; and WHEREAS, Lone Star Gas Company has filed a city gate rate case on or about November 1, 1996; and WHEREAS, conditions have changed substantially in the gas industry since the last Lone Star Gas gate rate case in 1982; and WHEREAS; Texas Utilities Electric Company is purchasing Lone Star Gas Company; and WHEREAS; the rates determined in the above proceeding may have an impact on the electric rates of Texas Utilities Electric Company customers; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: I. That the City Attorney of the City of North Richland Hills is hereby authorized to cause the intervention of the City of North Richland Hills and its participation in Texas Railroad Commission Gas Utilities Docket No. 8647 and related dockets and cases, including appeals. II. The City Attorney is further authorized to participate with a coalition of other cities in their participation in these matters and to hire attorneys and consultants necessary to effectuate such participation. Funding for this participation is appropriated from Account No. 01-99-01-5970. PASSED AND APPROVED this 25th day of November, 1996 Tommy Brown, Mayor _ _ e ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: Participation in the Coalition for Community Agenda Number: ana t::conomlc uevelopment - Kesolutlon No. 96-12 11/25/96 GN 96-144 Subject: Staff requested authorization at the Pre-Council meeting on November 11 to join with a coalition of cities to oppose legislative restrictions that would reduce local control and home rule authority in cities with 4A and 4B sales tax. The City Council authorized Staff to forward the City's membership dues to the Coalition. The attached Resolution and Interlocal Agreement formally supports and authorizes the City's participation in the Coalition for Community and Economic Development. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve Resolution No. 96-72, the Interlocal Agreement and the appointment of Mayor Brown to serve on the Steering Committee of the Coalition. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other _ Ø-áZiVtŸa fI~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available 01-99-01-5970 Finance Director Page 1 of _ RESOLUTION NO. 96-72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS SUPPORTING THE CREATION OF AND PARTICIPATION IN A COALITION OF CITIES TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE 4A AND 4B SALES TAX WHEREAS, the 4A and 4B sales tax corporations have provided hundreds of Texas cities a powerful tool for improving the quality of life and financial security of their citizens through economic development; and WHEREAS, existing laws governing use of sales tax revenues not only uphold local control, but sufficiently restrict the use of non-economic development related projects; and WHEREAS, legislation has been proposed to further restrict uses and to increase State controls and reporting requirements over the 4A and 4B sales tax and municipal tax abatement authority; and WHEREAS, the implementation of these restrictions, rules, and reporting requirements would erode local control and home rule authority in the area of economic development, create inequities among Texas cities, and decrease the ability of Texas communities to compete with other states for development projects; _ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS THAT: 1. The City of North Richland Hills supports the creation of and authorizes participation in a coalition of sales tax and sales tax eligible cities to work cooperatively to defend the sales tax and other measures utilized by Texas Cities to encourage economic development in their communities. 2. The purpose and goals of the coalition are recognized as follows: a: Actively oppose legislation that reduces local control of the 4A and 4B sales tax receipts. b. Monitor tax abatement legislation and oppose any further restriction upon municipal sales tax authority. c. Identify and promote "best practices" resulting from economic development experiences. e e e e 3. The City of North Richland Hills supports the following strategies for the coalition: a. Obtain approval of purpose and strategy by each city's Council. b. A steering committee will be comprised of a Council member from each city, with city managers and economic development directors serving as ex-officio members. Each city shall have one vote. c. Invite other cities to join the coalition. d. Adopt a position paper. e. Attempt to encourage state-wide organizations such as TML and TEDC to support the coalition's activities or be neutral on 4A or 4B legislation. f. Hire a legislative liaison. PASSED AND APPROVED this 25th day of November, 1996 Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney e e e INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, desires to enter into an Interlocal contract (the Agreement) to perform governmental functions in which the contracting parties are mutually interested; and WHEREAS, Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, authorizes such Agreement; and WHEREAS, each of such cities has heretofore authorized by an election the collection of additional sales taxes for funding of economic development corporations under the provisions of Article 5190.6, either Sections 4A or 4B, or both Sections 4A and 4B, the Development Corporation Act of 1979, as amended; and WHEREAS, proposals have been made in recent months relative to legislation to be introduced to the 75th Legislature of the State of Texas in January, 1997, which involves restrictions on sales tax corporations and tax abatements, among other things; and WHEREAS, the contracting parties believe that some of such legislative proposals could be damaging to the economic development of small and medium size cities and desire to form a coalition to study such proposals, employ a legislative consultant to develop the position of such cities with regard to such proposals and, if necessary, to furnish information and testimony relative to such legislative proposals; and WHEREAS, the contracting cities also desire to create an administrative agency and provide for the organization, cooperation, funding, and other responsibilities of such coalition in order to further the common purposes outlined herein for the benefit of each of the contracting parties; NOW, THEREFORE, the contacting parties agree as follows: 1. The contracting parties are the cities of Allen, Frisco, McKinney, Wylie, Duncanville, DeSoto, Lancaster, and Cedar Hill. Additional parties may become contracting parties by separate instrument referencing this Agreement whereby they agree to become parties hereto. 2. There is hereby created a Coalition For Community and Economic Development (CCED). The contracting parties and any additional parties made contracting parties as provided herein shall be members of the CCED. The purpose of the CCED is to work cooperatively to defend the additional sales tax and other measures utilized by Texas cities to encourage economic development in their communities. e 3. There is hereby created a Steering Committee for the CCED. The Steering Committee shall consist of one representative from each of the contracting cities including any additional contracting cities which become parties to this Agreement. The governing body of each contracting city shall select a member of the governing body, by official action, to serve on the Steering Committee of the coalition. The City Manager and Economic Development Director of each city shall be ex-officio members of the Steering Committee, shall provide information, advice, administrative assistance, and other support to the Steering Committee, but shall have no vote on matters coming before the Steering Committee. 4. The costs incurred by the CCED in performing the functions outlined in this Agreement shall be paid by the contracting cities. Each contracting city agrees to pay a membership fee to the CCED to defray the costs of operation. The membership fee shall be based upon the population of the contracting cities as determined by the current TML "Directory of Texas City Officials" publication. The membership fee for each contracting city shall be determined by using the following formula, to wit: Population of City Membership Fee _ Under 2500 2500 - 5000 5001 - 10,000 10,001 - 20,000 20,001 - 40,000 40,001 or larger $50.00 per 1000 population or part thereof $300.00 $600.00 $1200.00 $2400.00 $4800.00 Should the members of the Steering Committee from only Initiating Cities conclude the additional funds are needed from the Initiating Cities, a special assessment may be made by these members of the Steering Committee, and such special assessment shall be paid by the contracting cities who are classified as Initiating Cities. For the purpose of determining which city or cities shall be obligated to pay such special assessment the contracting cities shall be divided into two classes. Those cities initially signing this agreement shall be known as Initiating Cities. Cities which subsequently join the CCED may elect to be classified as an Initiating City. Cities subsequently joining the Coalition and who do not elect to be classified as an Initiating city. Cities subsequently joining the Coalition and who do not elect to be classified as an Initiating City will be classified as a Joining City. e Only the Initiating Cities shall be liable for the Special Assessment. Any such Special Assessment shall be charged to each of the Initiating Cities in proportion to its population. e _ _ Any surplus funds remaining after the legislative session has been concluded shall be returned in the same percentage to the contracting Cities, or in the discretion of the Steering Committee may be retained and used during the term of this agreement. 5. The primary purpose of the CCED is to monitor and oppose, if necessary, potential legislation that would adversely affect the future use of sales tax revenue to support business development in the contracting cities. The people of each of the contacting cities have heretofore adopted by election an economic development sales tax of up to one half cent and have created corporations under the Development Corporation Act of 1979. Each of such corporations has been formed and is operating under the provisions of either Section 4A or 4B of that Act. Over three hundred cities of the State of Texas have adopted the additional sales tax for the purpose of encouraging economic development or to support economic, park and open space and sports complex development. 6. The CCED is formed for the following specific purposes: A. To actively oppose legislation that reduces local control of the 4A and the 4B sales tax receipts; B. To monitor tax abatement legislation and to oppose, if necessary, inequity in the treatment of cities; C. To identify and promote the best practices for the economic development of cites which have taken advantage of the sales tax program; D. To employ a professional consultant for the CCED to interact with the Texas Legislature during the 1997 Session, the 75th Legislature, to promote the general and specific purposes of the CCED; E. To encourage statewide organizations such as Texas Municipal League and the Texas Economic Development Council to support the CCED efforts and to oppose or remain neutral on legislative attempts to restrict the economic development capabilities of the cities. 7. The Steering Committee of the CCED will create an administrative agency or designate one of the contracting cities to supervise the performance of the Agreement. The administrative agency or designated city may employ personnel, perform administrative activities, and provide administrative services necessary to perform the Agreement. e _ e 8. The Steering Committee shall: A. Elect a Chairman B. Determine the time, place and frequency of its meetings; C. Develop a strategy for the CCED and prepare a position paper relative to . the proposed legislation and other purposes of the CCED; D. Invite other cities to join the CCED; 9. This Agreement has been authorized by the governing body of each party to the Agreement. 10. Each member of the Steering Committee shall have one vote on matters coming before the Steering Committee. A majority vote of the members of the Steering Committee present at any meeting shall be sufficient to act on any matter of business. Members may appear in person, or by representative designated in writing, or may vote on a particular matter in writing by proxy, or delegate to another person in writing the authority to vote for such Member as his proxy. 11. All members of the Steering Committee shall be given 72 hours written notice by mail or facsimile of any meeting of the CCED. The representative of the designated administrative agency shall be responsible to furnish such notice. Additional committees may be created and duties and responsibilities assigned to them. Operational policies and procedures shall be adopted at the organizational meeting. 12. Each city paying a membership fee or an assessment to the CCED as provided by this Agreement shall do so from current revenues of the city. · _ _ e 13. This Agreement shall be effective for a period of one year from the date hereof, and may be renewed from year to year. Executed in multiple counterparts by the contacting cities to be effective on the day of , 1996. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson, City Secretary ~ , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Subject: Appointment of Records Management Officer - Ordinance NO. ~'ÖU Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: 11/25/96 GN 96-145 The Local Government Code requires that the City designate a Records Management Officer. The position of Records Management Officer has been vacant. Ms. Kathryn Brown has been hired by the City Secretary to fill this position. The attached ordinance designates Ms. Brown as the new Records Management Officer for the City. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 2160. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget__ ~d Signature -f21¡ ~~ Manager CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM FlnenC8 Diector Page 1 of .. . _ e ORDINANCE NO. 2160 WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 1444, the City Council had heretofore established a Records Management Program to be administered and implemented by the City Secretary; and WHEREAS, the City is required by statute to designate a Records Management Officer (RMO); and WHEREAS, the position of Records Management Officer (RMO) has been vacant; and WHEREAS, the City Secretary has designated Ms. Kathryn Brown as the new Records Management Officer (RMO) of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The designation by the City Secretary of Kathryn Brown as the Records Management Officer of the City of North Richland Hills be and is hereby approved and her appointment shall be effective November 25, 1996 upon passage and approval of this ordinance. 2. The duties of the Records Management Officer shall be those imposed by Ordinance No. 1444, Chapter 203 of the Local Government Code and such other lawful duties as may be imposed by the City Secretary. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 25th day of November, 1996. APPROVED: Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire - Attorney for City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance Department: Council Meeting Date: 11-25-96 Subject: Award Contract for Collection of Delinquent EMS and Utility Bills Agenda Number: PU 96-89 Stanford Financial, the collection agency that handles collection of delinquent EMS and utility bills for the City, was acquired by Assetcare. Due to the size of the company and customer base, the new company felt that another collection agency could better handle collection of delinquent utility bills. However, they would like to continue processing delinquent EMS bills. Staff feels it would be in the best interest of the City to work with one collection agency for both types of delinquent accounts. The City received proposals from several collection agencies. The following table summarized the fees for each agency for both types of City accounts. Dynamic Recovery IC System MSB Diversified Credit System EMS & Utility 30% EMS & Utility 35% EMS: 30% < 1 yr. old 45% > 1 yr. old Utility: 30% 75 days 35% 120 days EMS & Utility 30% Municipal Service Bureau (MSB) is an Austin based company that specializes in providing billing and collection services for over two hundred seventy-five (275) municipal and county entities in the State of Texas. MSB previously assisted the North Richland Hills Municipal Court in the collection of warrants. The Municipal Court staff had a good working relationship with MSB and were pleased with the results achieved. The terms of the contract with MSB will be in full force and effect until terminated in writing by either party. If the agreement is terminated, any City accounts then held by MSB will be returned to the City within ninety (90) days of the termination date. Recommendation: Based on their municipal expertise and past performance, staff recommends awarding the contract to MSB. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) S~uffiCient Funds ~vailable ~ihe:~ting Budget - ~ 1~ Department Head S;gnatu,e ... ~~ager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM FlMnClt 0_ Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Support Services Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Award Bid for Annual Contract to Supply Janitorial Paper Products Agenda Number: PU 96-90 In the 1996/97 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for the purchase of janitorial paper products. Formal bids were solicited for an annual contract and the results are outlined below. Boritex Building Services m:·····::,····:';¢?·..,fa·N·[2:·::··:·2:::··· . ... .. ... ',. ','...' .', :.....:-::-»::>.-:~:............. National Sanitary Supply $16,776 $18,629 H&H Supply Company Formal bids were solicited for estimated quantities of paper towels, toilet paper and garbage bags to be used by Support Services, Parks and the Fire Department. The specifications requested bidders to quote these items and to make deliveries on an as need basis. Each bidder was requested to submit samples of their products for evaluation. All samples submitted were evaluated and Boritex Building Services met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid. FundinQ Source: 06-01-02-2700 01-75-30-2700 01-90-04-2700 Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for the annual contract to supply janitorial paper supplies to Boritex Building Services in the amount of $14,822. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget ~ Other ~/)U Department ead Finance Review Acct. Number See Above Sufficient Funds Available FlnMCO Director ~ I nature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Fire Department Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Award Bid for Fire Department Duty Uniforms Agenda Number: PU 96-91 In the 1996/97 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for the purchase of duty uniforms for Fire Department personnel. Formal bids were solicited for these uniforms and the results are outlined below. Uniforms, Inc. $5,170 I§~iªº R & R Uniforms Peter West Uniforms $5,723 $5,763 $6,360 Centex Uniforms Ladd Uniforms . The bid submitted by Uniforms, Inc. did not meet the minimum specifications. R&R Uniforms met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and can deliver the uniforms within three weeks. R&R Uniforms has provided uniforms for other City departments in the past and has provided good service and quality uniforms. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for Fire Department duty uniforms to R&R Uniforms in the amount of $5,700. Source of Funds: Bends- a/Rev.) .. Operating udget ~ Other \ ~L Department He d Sign ture CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number 01-90-04-2200 Su . ient Funds Available FI.....ce Olre<:lor Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance /Information Services Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Authorize Purchase of Novell Network Operating System from DIR Agenda Number: PU 96-92 In the 1996/97 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for computer software purchases and computer software upgrades. Information Services wishes to purchase new Novell 4.11 network operating system licenses for City Hall and the Richland Tennis Center and upgrade existing licenses in the Police Department, Fire Department, Environmental Services, Parks and Recreation and NRH20. The operating system will also include electronic mail and scheduling software. This acquisition will satisfy two elements of the Information Services three year plan. These licenses and upgrades are available through the cooperative purchasing agreement with the State Department of Information Resources (DIR) using the Master Licenses Agreement. Licenses purchased under this agreement will include upgrades for two years which will allow all City locations and Departments to be added to the system. The total cost through DIR is $35,414.50. Purchases through the DlR cooperative purchasing agreement satisfy all State competitive bidding laws. FundinQ Source: 16-01-05-6490 16-01-03-3445 09-92-49-6000 $10,000.00 24,415.20 999.30 $35,414.50 Recommendation: It is recommended City Council authorize the purchase of Novell 4.11 software and upgrades through the Department of Information Resources in the total amount of $35,414.50. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget L ~ L,.- ~ I - A ~ Departme~Head~ee CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number See Above Su lcient Funds Available FlnenC8 Direct.. City Manager Page 1 of l' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS / Department: Parks and Recreation Department Council Meeting Date: Subject: Beverage Vendor Request for Proposal - Coca-Cola Bottling Company of North Texas Agenda Number: 11/25/96 PU 96-93 Staff solicited request for proposals for a beverage vendor for the Richland Tennis Center. Proposals were received, reviewed and negotiated with Coca-Cola, Dr. Pepper and Pepsi-Cola. Staff determined that Coca-Cola's proposal best fits the needs of Richland Tennis Center. Coca-Cola is recommended due to better revenue opportunities resulting from product recognition with their "Powerade" sports drink. Coca-Cola's promotional and sponsorship proposal was better than Dr. Pepper and Pepsi-Cola. Some of the highlights of Coca-Cola's proposal are: · Coca-Cola will provide $500 a year per contract year for marketing support. This money may be used to promote or support any programs offered through the Richland Tennis Center. · Coca-Cola will provide soft drink fast flow fountain dispensing equipment, lid and cup dispensers at no charge. · Coca-Cola will supply at no cost or charge to Richland Tennis Center maintenance and repair service on all machines and equipment provided. · Coca-Cola will provide support for promotional/special events in the following forms: 1. Portable premixed equipment- one special event trailer with each event. 2. Complimentary product including isotonics (sports drinks) to sell at three events per year. · At no charge, Coca-Cola will 'supply "point of purchase" equipment to Richland Tennis Center. Such items are "point of sale" signs, clocks and Coca-cola promotional banners. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other -k-~~ - ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance DIr.ctot Page 1 of 2... .' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Richland Tennis Center Obligations: · Coca-Cola is the exclusive beverage provider for Richland Tennis Center. · Coca-Cola will be listed on Richland Tennis Center promotional pieces. · Coca-Cola's logo will be placed on souvenir cups sold at Richland Tennis Center. The contract will be signed for a duration of two years, beginning December 1, 1996 - November 30, 1998. Coca-Cola has the first right of refusal of contract at the time of renewal. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve and authorize staff to execute the Coca-Cola Bottling Company of North Texas proposal as the "beverage vendor" for Richland Tennis Center. Paoe 2 of 2 · CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Parks and Recreation Department Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Purchase of Lot 1 B, Block 2, Walker Branch Addition for Girls Softball Complex Agenda Number: PU 96-94 The Parks and Recreation Department applied for a Texas Parks and Wildlife Department grant to develop the Girls Fast Pitch Softball Complex which includes the purchase of the above-described 12.85 acre property. The property is a vacant tract along Walker Branch Creek, fronting on Emerald Hills Way, and is owned by Golf and Bat Family Fun Center, Rob and Vicki McCauley, Partners. . Texas Parks and Wildlife (TPW) acquisition guidelines require two appraisals to determine the fair market value of the property and, accordingly, the amount of the grant. Based on the appraisals, a preliminary purchase price could be negotiated with the property owner. The appraisals would then be submitted to TPW for determination of the final grant amount. The appraisals were completed in May of 1996; one valued the property at $83,500 and the other at $103,000. Mark Bradley, Right-of-Way Agent, met with Mr. McCauley on September 6, 1996. Mr. McCauley stated that he would sell the property to the City for $93,500. During Pre-Council Executive Session on September 23, 1996, Council approved this preliminary sales price, contingent on approval of the TPW grant appraisals. On November 18,1996, TPW approved an amount "between $83,500 and $103,000" for purchase of the property. Recommendation: It is recommended that Council authorize the right-of-way agent to acquire Lot 1 B, Block 2, Walker Branch Addition for the negotiated price of $93,500. Attachments Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number 09-92-22-6000 Sufficient Funds ~vailable c- ~ ~~---r-- ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Fin"".. D.ector Page 1 of I , " I . '. " ~ ..z::t~~Eö_-::r; . llJ· , r~~~~~ + _ _ _ __ _ _ .___ _ _ _ _ __J~~~' 't"r"',',' I' , , I I I ,:".J ~ I Ilo!LRt: .: _c.;, II J W· ----to-=--.___ i· ,» ;~ '. ---0---_-.___ I Þ - j - - _..._ , M 'H , I -- ~ ø~f¡,~; L.. '"'V€.'i -tJ'" ,." "'¡\...~O""- I I -~ ";11.1 ')..J " - ---- ----- 'I ¡- 't;il. ~. 21. J, 4~ :1 TJII,'A . 2.44 ~:. .. - (- -.L- I .. - -- -: T~.' ",.., . 1 :. _ ,s . ,. 1.n .. J~' ,. :¡,¡t,/,~ t~ . I ~ø ~lb~ 1'I>\..f(EP \...C·,,€.t SrJP' !j:3 '. ~_16 .. ~ .1...1.. , , , , , , I,'''' '" " I , " I ,I' I , , , . , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , , , " 'J ',_ 1\ " \ ,~.... ~ I /, I I' · 'I' \ AI \', . , , , , , II ',' , " 8 H' ~~~c.'t\ 1, /¿OC.ATio MAP - ~ -, -, <---¡: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance ¡Information Services Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Authorize Purchase of Disk Drives from the City of Richardson Agenda Number: PU 96-95 The Information Services Department is in need of two IBM Model 9336 hard disk drives and two IBM Model 6112 disk controller boards for the AS/400 computers located in City Hall and the Police Department. The City of Richardson has the above mentioned computer equipment and will be disposing of this equipment in the near future and wishes to enter into an interlocal agreement for the sale of this equipment for a price not to exceed $1,000. Staff believes it will be in the best interest of the City to enter into said agreement with the City of Richardson. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council authorize the interlocal agreement with the City of Richardson for the purchase of the above mentioned computer equipment for an amount not to exceed $1,000. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget -2L Other Finance Review Acct. Number 16-01-02-6430 Suffi ient Funds Available ignature CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM FI....ce Cnc:tor Page 1 of , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 21 in the Amount of Subject: $46,255 17 to J L Bertram r.onstnJction & Fnoineerino. Agenda Number: Inc. for Strummer Drive Paving & Drainage Improvements 11/25/96 PAY 96-13 This CIP project was awarded by Council on 5/23/94, PW 94-19 for $855,109.22 to J.L. Bertram Construction & Engineering, Inc. Including Change Order NO.1 in the amount of $103,668.73 needed for intersection improvements at S.H. 26 and Strummer Drive, the total contract amount increased to $958,777.95. Final payment (including Change Order No.1) will make the contractor's total earnings on the project $944,986.81, which is $13,791.14 under the contract amount. In addition to the savings of $13,791, the developer on the north side of S.H. 26 at Strummer Drive, Amerco Real Estate, agreed to pay their fair share for the intersection improvements. They were notified by mail on October 25, 1996 that their share is $6,294. The contractor substantially completed this project on March 5, 1996. The original contract completion time was 225 calendar days. The contractor exceeded the original contract completion time by 501 days. (See attached letter from Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. for detailed explanation of delays and justification for the credit of approximately 302 calendar days.) The contractor has previously requested time extensions due to utility adjustment delays by Lone Star Gas Company, and the unusually wet weather conditions for the first year of the project. In addition, there were delays associated with the Texas Department of Transportation coordination on the S.H. 26 intersection improvements which were beyond the contractor's control. The project is now totally complete with all final adjustments having been made. Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available in account #13-30-92-6000 (Strummer Drive Paving & Drainage Improvements ). Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve final payment to J.L. Bertram Construction & Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $46,255.17. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) . Operating Budget _ Ot r _ Acct. Number Su 'cient Funds Available I 3- 30- 92- 6000 Fln""C8 Director Page 1 of . . . . RECEIVED NOV 1 9 1996 KNOWl TON-E NClISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas November 19, 1996 Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N .E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-368, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, STRUMMER DRIVE PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 21 & FINAL (REVISED) Enclosed is one copy of REVISED Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 21 and Final, dated November 19, 1996, made payable to J.L. Bertram Construction & Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $46,255.17, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of September 30, 1996. The quantities and conditions of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Mr. Ken Matheson, as indicated by his signature on the estimate dated November 8, 1996, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. A summary of the current project status is presented in the following table: TOTAL CONTRACT PERCENT BREAKDOWN THIS MONTH EARNINGS AMOUNT COMPLETE UncI. Retainage) Paving $34,075.36 $701,390.29 $715,957.60 97.97 Drainage 8,242.11 164,842.27 163,221.22 100.99 Water 3,781.59 75,631.70 74,476.58 101.55 Sewer 156.11 3,122.55 5,122.55 60.96 TOTALS 46,255.17 944,986.81 958,777.95 98.56 TIME (Calendar Days) 833 225 370.22 Note that the time to date has exceeded the original contract completion time of 225 calendar days. The contractor has previously requested time extensions due to utility adjustments delays by Lone Star Gas Company, and because of the unusually wet weather conditions for the first year of this project. Also delays associated with TxDOT coordination on S.H. 26 intersection improvements were beyond the Contractor's control. As noted in previous 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO 817/267-3367. FAX 817/354-4389 . . . Page 2, November 19, 1996 Strummer Drive Contractor's Estimate No. 21 and Final (Revised) contractor's estimate letters, we agree that the requested time extensions were warranted. See attached letter dated March 5, 1996, for our recommendations regarding time extensions for this project. The inspector has indicated that the contractor completed the extra work associated with the S.H. 26 intersection improvements within the additional 70 days allocated for this change order. Therefore, in view of all the delays associated with the main project and intersection improvements which were beyond the contractor's control, liquidated damages were not incurred nor should they be assessed. Contractor's earnings total $944,986.81, which is $13,791.14 under the contract amount of $958,777.95. The primary reason for the savings is unused miscellaneous paving, drainage and sewer allowance contingency funds. The two (2) year period of maintenance begins on this date, and therefore, will terminate on November 19, 1998. The maintenance obligation includes repair of water line, sanitary sewer line, or storm drainage breaks or stoppage resulting from improper embedment, compaction, backfill or poor workmanship. The maintenance obligation also includes sealing of pavement cracks, repair of pavement buckling or other failures, along with failure of all concrete flatwork and other concrete structures. In the absence of any negative comments concerning the final condition of this project, and after the contractor has furnished an affidavit affirming that all subcontractors and suppliers have been paid, we recommend that the final payment of $46,255.17, be made to J.L. Bertram Construction & Engineering, Inc., 1007 Harrison Avenue, Arlington, Texas 76010. We will be present at the November 25, 1996, Council meeting to assist you with answers to any questi ich the Council ve concerning this project. " RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RW Nlld/Enclosures/Final.368/ xc: Mr. C.A. Sanford, City Manager Mr. Randy Shiflet, Assistant City Manager Mr. Larry Cunningham, Assistant City Manager Ms. Jackie Theriot, Acting Director of Finance Mr. Mike Curtis, P.E., Capital Improvements Coordinator Mr. Ken Matheson, City Inspector Mr. James G. Humphrey, President J.L. Bertram CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE PAGE 1 OF 3 Estimate No.: 21 & FINAL (REVISED) Job No.: 3-368 Date: 19-Nov-96 File No: NRH368.wK3 Cal Days: 2:25 . Project Description: STRUMMER DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS W.O. Date: 20-Jun-94 Scheduled Completion Date: 31-Jan-95 For Materials Furnished and Labor Contractor: J.L. BERTRAM CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING, IN Performed in Period Ending: 30-Sep-96 Owner: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Time Charged Thru Period (Days): 833 Place: NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PREVIOUS THIS UNIT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT 1P. Remove Existing Brick Wall L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 2P ." Unclassified Street Exc. (Asphalt) C.Y. 1,201.00 0.00 1,201.00 5.37 6,449.37 3P. Controlled Density Embankment C.Y. 536.00 0.00 536.00 2.10 1,125.60 4P. Remove Existing Curb and Gutter L.F. 5,252.00 0.00 5,252.00 1.05 5,514.60 5P. Remove Existing Concrete Flatwork S.F. 13,164.00 0.00 13,164.00 0.42 5,528.88 6P .. Saw Cuts to Remove Asphalt or Concrete L.F. 6,006.00 0.00 6,006.00 1.84 11,051.04 7P. 8" Thick Lime Stabilized SUbgrade S.Y. 18,612.00 0.00 18,612.00 1.30 24,195.60 8P. 6" Thick Lime Stabilized Subgrade S.Y. 828.00 0.00 828.00 1.30 1,076.40 9P. Lime for Stabilized Subgrade TONS 387.09 0.00 387.09 73.60 28,489.82 10P. MC-30 or MS-2 Prime Coat w/Sand S.Y. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 1 OPR ." MC-30 or MS-2 Prime Coat w/Sand S.Y. 2,618.00 0.00 2,618.00 0.25 654.50 11P. RC-2 or EA-HVRS Tack Coat S.Y. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 11 PR .* RC-2 or EA-HVRS Tack Coat S.Y. 14,716.00 0.00 14,716.00 0.13 1,913.08 12P. Type "A" HMAC S.Y. 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.20 0.00 12PR .* Type "A" HMAC S.Y. 13,386.00 (230.00) 13,156.00 3.48 45,782.88 13P. Type "D" HMAC S.Y. 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.31 0.00 13PR .* Type "D" HMAC S.Y. 2,678.00 (46.00) 2,632.00 3.55 9,343.60 14P. Ty. "D" HMAC for Transitions & Misc. Uses TONS 398.39 0.00 398.39 41.50 16,533.19 . 15P. 6" Curb & 24" Gutter (6" Thick) L.F. 479.00 0.00 479.00 6.50 3,113.50 16P. 6" Monolithic Curb L.F. 677.00 0.00 677.00 3.00 2,031.00 17P. 5" Thick Concrete Driveways S.F. 9,289.00 0.00 9,289.00 2.70 25,080.30 17P1. 6" Thick Concrete Driveways S.F. 5,732.23 0.00 5,732.23 3.03 17,368.66 19P. 4" Thick Concrete Sidewalks S.F. 5,919.00 0.00 5,919.00 2.25 13,317.75 19P1. 4" Thick Concrete Sidewalks (Type "B") S.F. 2,560.00 0.00 2,560.00 2.15 5,504.00 19P2. Type "P" Headwall EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,800.00 0.00 20P. Wheelchair Ramps EACH 13.00 0.00 13.00 275.00 3,575.00 21P. Topsoil for Fill 4" Deep S.Y. 1,550.00 0.00 1,550.00 1.30 2,015.00 22P .* Solid Sodding w/St. Augustine or Bermuda S.Y. 1,550.00 0.00 1,550.00 2.42 3,751.00 23P .* Hydromulch or Seeding in Place S.Y. 4,110.00 0.00 4,110.00 0.58 2,383.80 24P. Adjust Sanitary Sewer Manholes EACH 4.00 0.00 4.00 300.00 1,200.00 25P. Adjust Water Valve & Cleanout Boxes EACH 12.00 0.00 12.00 165.00 1,980.00 26P. Barricades, Signs and Traffic Handling L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 6,500.00 6,500.00 27P. Mobilization L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 16,850.00 16,850.00 27P1. Erosion and Sediment Control L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 4,960.00 4,960.00 28P. Project Sign EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 370.00 0.00 29P .* 4" Dia. White Non-Reff. Traffic Buttons EACH 670.00 0.00 670.00 2.26 1,514.20 30P .* 4" Dia. Yellow Non-Reff. Traffic Buttons EACH 1,438.00 0.00 1,438.00 2.26 3,249.88 31P.* Type I-C Pavement Markers EACH 201.00 0.00 201.00 3.79 761.79 32P .* Type 11M "Amber" Pavement Markers EACH 339.00 0.00 339.00 3.79 1,284.81 33P. Blue Reffective Fire Hydrant Markers EACH 7.00 0.00 7.00 6.30 44.10 33PR .* 24" Dia. RCP L.F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.37 0.00 34P. Extruded Thermoplastic Arrows EACH 14.00 0.00 14.00 95.00 1,330.00 35P. 3" Dia. Sch. 40 Elec. PVC L.F. 170.00 0.00 170.00 6.80 1,156.00 36P. Pull Boxes EACH 2.00 0.00 2.00 290.00 580.00 37P. Miscellaneous Paving Allowance L.S. 0.548508 0.000000 0.548508 10,000.00 5,485.08 . 38P." Remove Ex. HMAC Driveway, Complete S.F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.00 39P .* Type "A" HMAC Driveway S.Y. 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.50 0.00 40P .* Type "A" HMAC, Compacted 1" Thk S.Y. 2,678.00 (46.00) 2,632.00 1.80 4,737.60 41P.* Erosion & Sediment Control (Silt Fence) L.F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.70 0.00 SUB-TOTAL AMOUNT PAVING CONSTRUCTION: $289,032.03 CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE PAGE 2 OF 3 Estimate No.: 21 & FINAL (REVISED) Job No.: 3-368 Date: 19-Nov-96 . File No: NRH368.WK3 Cal Days: 225 Project Description: STRUMMER DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS W.O. Date: 20-Jun-94 Scheduled Completion Date: 31-Jan-95 For Materials Furnished and Labor Contractor: J.L. BERTRAM CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING, IN Performed in Period Ending: 30-Sep-96 Owner: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Time Charged Thru Period (Days): 833 Place: NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PREVIOUS THIS UNIT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT SUB-TOTAL AMOUNT PAVING CONSTRUCTION: $289,032.03 42P ." Barricades, Signs & Traffic Handling L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 $7,900.00 $7,900.00 43P ." Pipe Post (Type 1) Mounted Sign EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 475.00 0.00 44P." Pipe Post (Type 2) Mounted Sign EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 475.00 0.00 45P ." Ref!. Pvmnt Marking 24" Sid White L.F. 102.00 0.00 102.00 7.90 805.80 46P ." Ref!. Pvmnt Marking 12" Sid White L.F. 130.00 0.00 130.00 4.75 617.50 47P ." Ref!. Pvmnt Marking 8" Sid White L.F. 260.00 0.00 260.00 2.65 689.00 48P .. Ref!. Pvmnt Marking 12" Sid Yellow L.F. 392.00 0.00 392.00 4.75 1,862.00 49P .. Ref!. Pvmnt Marking 4" Sid White L.F. 1,785.00 0.00 1,785.00 1.58 2,820.30 50P .. Ref!. Pvmnt Marking 4" Double Sid Yellow L.F. 3,438.00 0.00 3,438.00 2.63 9,041.94 51P ." Types 1 & 2 Ref!. Pvmnt Markings Sid Whi EACH 8.00 0.00 8.00 160.00 1,280.00 52P .. Type 3 Ref!. Pvmnt Marking White "ONLY" EACH 4.00 0.00 4.00 185.00 740.00 53P .. Type 4 Ref!. Pvmnt Marking Sid White Arro EACH 2.00 0.00 2.00 315.00 630.00 1C. Unci. Street Exe. for 7" Thick Cone. Pvmnt C.Y. 7,899.00 0.00 7,899.00 5.37 42,417.63 2C. 7" Thick, 3000 PSI CI. "A" Cone. Paving S.Y. 16,489.00 0.00 16,489.00 18.72 308,674.08 3C. 6" Curb & 24" Gutter (7" Thick Gutter) L.F. 5,563.00 0.00 5,563.00 6.27 34,880.01 . TOTAL AMQUNT PAVING CONSTRUCTION: $701,390.29 10. Remove Exist. 24" Storm Drain L.F. 142.00 0.00 142.00 $25.26 $3,586.92 20. 7'x4' Precast Concrete Storm Drain Box L.F. 321.00 0.00 321.00 186.30 59,802.30 3D. 27" Dia. (ASTM C-76 CI. 11/) RCP L.F. 550.00 0.00 550.00 43.60 23,980.00 40. 24" Dia. (ASTM C-76 CI. 11/) RCP L.F. 542.00 0.00 542.00 37.00 20,054.00 50. 18" Dia. (ASTM C-76 CI. 1/1) RCP L.F. 131.00 0.00 131.00 29.40 3,851.40 60. 20' Std. Cast-In-Place Curb Inlet EACH 2.00 0.00 2.00 2,950.00 5,900.00 70. 15' Std. Cast-In-Place Curb Inlet EACH 5.00 0.00 5.00 2,420.00 12,100.00 80. 10' Std. Cast-In-Place Curb Inlet EACH 8.00 0.00 8.00 1,710.00 13,680.00 90. Vault at Sta. 1+57.5 L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,900.00 1,900.00 100. Vault at Sta. 0+00 L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 3,580.00 3,580.00 110. Storm Drain Field Connection EACH 10.00 0.00 10.00 265.00 2,650.00 120. Asphalt Pavement Replacement L.F. 26.00 0.00 26.00 54.75 1,423.50 130. 6" Dia. DIP Thru 7'x4' Box for SS L.F. 20.00 0.00 20.00 35.80 716.00 140. 7'x4' Box Connection to Ex. Channel Liner L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,050.00 1,050.00 150. Drainage Trency Safety Systems L.F. 1,568.00 0.00 1,568.00 1.05 1,646.40 160. Miscellaneous Drainage Allowance L.S. 0.48025 0.00000 0.48025 5,000.00 2,401.25 170. Temporary Asphalt Pavement Replacemen L.F. 276.00 0.00 276.00 10.50 2,898.00 180. 30" Dia. (ASTM C-76 CI. 11/) RCP L.F. 70.00 0.00 70.00 51.75 3,622.50 TOTAL DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION: $164,842.27 . CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE PAGE 3 OF 3 Estimate No.: 21 & FINAL (REVISED) Job No.: 3-368 Date: 19-Nov-96 . File No: NRH368.1JVK3 Cal Days: 225 Project Description: STRUMMER DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS W.O. Date: 20-Jun-94 Scheduled Completion Date: 31-Jan-95 For Materials Furnished and Labor Contractor: J.L. BERTRAM CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING, IN Performed in Period Ending: 30-Sep-96 Owner: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Time Charged Thru Period (Days): 833 Place: NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PREVIOUS THIS UNIT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT 1W. 8" Dia. (DR-18) PVC Water Pipe L.F. 1,199.00 0.00 1,199.00 $23.42 $28,080.58 2W. 6" Dia. (DR-18) PVC Water Pipe L.F. 413.00 0.00 413.00 21.05 8,693.65 4W. 6" Gate Valve & Box EACH 9.00 0.00 9.00 370.00 3,330.00 5W. 8"x6" Tap. Saddle W/6" Tap. GV & Box EACH 2.00 0.00 2.00 1,370.00 2,740.00 6W. Fire Hydrant EACH 5.00 0.00 5.00 1,050.00 5,250.00 7W. Ductile Iron Fittings TON 4.250 0.00 4.250 2,160.00 9,180.00 8W. Salvage Existing Wtr Vlvs and/or Wtr Mtrs EACH 12.00 0.00 12.00 158.00 1,896.00 9W. Salvage Fire Hydrant Assembly EACH 2.00 0.00 2.00 210.00 420.00 10W. Long Single Water Service EACH 11.00 0.00 11.00 590.00 6,490.00 11W. Temporary Asphalt Pavement L.F. 530.00 0.00 530.00 6.32 3,349.60 12W. Water Trench Safety L.F. 1,612.00 0.00 1,612.00 0.11 177.32 13W. Miscellaneous Water Plumbing Allowance L.S. 1.20491 0.00000 1.20491 5,000.00 6,024.55 TOTAL WATER UTILITY CONSTRUCTION: $75,631.70 . 1 S . 6" Dia. (DR-35) PVC San. Sewer Pipe 2S. Type "Au 4'_0" Dia. Cast-in-Place SSMH 3S. Sanitary Sewer Trench Safety 4S . Misc. Sewer Allowance L.F. EACH L.F. L.S. 51.00 2.00 51.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.00 2.00 51.00 0.00 $19.00 1,050.00 1.05 2,000.00 $969.00 2,100.00 53.55 0.00 TOTAL SEWER UTILITY CONSTRUCTION: $3,122.55 Field Verification of Job Conditions and Confirmation of Pay Quantities Approved: Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. ByCo"R;;'~ (Project Manager) Original Submittal Signed By: KEN MATHESON (Owner's Project Representative) / / - ¡q-qt, Date: NOVEMBER 8, 1996 Date: $34,075.36 8,242.11 3,781.59 156.11 $46,255.17 Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less Percent (%) Retained. . . . Difference. . . . . . . Plus (%) Materials on Hand. Total. . . . . . . . . Less Previous Payments. . Difference Due this Estimate . (Note: Pay Last Amount Shown) 0% $944,986.81 0.00 944,986.81 0.00 944,986.81 898,731.64 $46,255.17 This Estimate No. Retainage Only! Pavement Drainage Water Sewer 21 & FINAL (REVISED) 100% Total Total Earnings (Incl. Retain.): .ime Charged Thru This Period: 944,986.81 833 Obligation: $958,777.95 Time: 225 Percent: Percent: 98.56% 370.22% . . . . K NOWL rON-E NC II 5 H-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSUL TlNG ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dall~ March 5, 1996 Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-368, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, STRUMMER DRIVE PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CALCULATION OF CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION As you instructed, we have prepared an estimate of the contract time extensions required for the referenced project due to delays caused by abnormal weather and utility relocations by others which were beyond the Contractor's control. We have met with the project inspector, Mr. Ken Matheson, and we have determined which periods of time since the work order date that the contractor could not work due to utility delays and other causes. We have also determined from NOAA Local Climatological Data the number of wet weather days above normal during which the contractor could not work. The following is a discussion of the project chronology along with an explanation of delays including the estimated number of days associated with each delay: 1. Work Order Date, June 20, 1994 Substantial Completion Date, November 3, 1995 Paving Complete, Two- Way Traffic on Strummer (Minor Cleanup Remaining) Total Elapsed Time (Calendar Days) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501 Days 2. Delays Caused by Utility Companies from June 20, 1994 to September 19, 1994, Including SWB, LSG, ARCO Pipeline, etc. (See attached letter dated September 2, 1994) 3. Requested Time Extension (Calendar Days) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (90 Days) Additional Delays Caused by Utility Companies September 19, 1994 to December 16, 1994 1901 CENTRAL DR.. SUITE 550. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 .8171283-6211 . METRO 817/267-3367. FAX 817/354-4389 . . . Page 2, March 5, 1996 Calculation of Contract Time Extension ..7 (See attached letter dated January 13, 1995) Requested Time Extension (Calendar Days) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (90 Days) 4. From Inspector's Log Book, Additional SWB Delays and LSG Relocation Delays from December 16, 1994 until February 17, 1995 Delays (Calendar Days) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (30 Days) 5. From Inspector's Log Book, Time Lost from May 2, 1995 to May 5, 1995 for LSG to Re-Lower Main Delays (Calendar Days) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3 Days) 6. From Inspector's Log Book, Time Lost Waiting for TU-Electric to Move Power Pole at Strummer and Bedford-Euless, also Waiting for LSG to Repair and Lower Another Main from July 25, 1995 to September 15, 1995 (Contractor was able to do some cleanup and construct tops of some inlets) Delays (Calendar Days) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (52 days) 7. From Inspector's Log Book, Time Lost Waiting for City Crews to Lower Water Line in Pearl Street from December 11, 1995 to December 15, 1995 Delays (Calendar Days) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3 Days) 8. Wet Weather Delays above the Normal for Each Month During the Contract Period, in accordance with Section 3.2.12 of the Contract Documents June, 1994 July, 1994 August, 1994 September, 1994 October, 1994 November, 1994 December, 1994 12 Rain Days - 5 Normal Rain Days = 8 - 3 = 6 -7 = 12 - 6 = 16 - 6 = 15 - 6 = 2 Days 7 Days · 5 Days · o Days · 6 Days · 10 Days · 9 Days · . . . Page 3, March 5, 1996 Calculation of Contract Time Extension January, 1995 February, 1995 March, 1995 April, 1995 May, 1995 June, 1995 July, 1995 August, 1995 September, 1995 October, 1995 November, 1995 11-7= 8 - 7 = 16 - 7 = 12 - 8 = 17 - 9 = 7 - 6 = 9 - 5 = 7 - 5 = 10-7= 5 - 6 = 7 - 6 = 4 Days · I Day · 9 Days 4 Days 8 Days 1 Day 4 Days 2 Days 3 Days o Days 1 Days Total Delays Due to Abnormal Rain (Calendar Days) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (34 Days) * Note: Days not included in this total since they overlap utility delay dates TOTAL DELAYS BEYOND THE CONTRACTOR'S CONTROL ........ (302 Days) TOTAL CONTRACT TIME AcruALLY USED = 501 - 302 = 199 CALENDAR DAYS TOTAL CONTRACT COMPLETION TIME = 225 CALENDAR DAYS CALENDAR DAYS UNDER CONTRACT COMPLETION TIME = 225 - 199 = 26 DAYS Based on the chronology outline above, we would recommend that the Contractor receive credit for approximately 302 Calendar Days of delays out of the 501 total Calendar Days elapsed from the Work Order Date of June 20, 1994, to the Substantial Completion Date of November 3, 1995. This would reduce the actual Contract Time used to 199 Calendar Days, which is 26 days under the Contract Completion time of 225 Calendar Days. Please call if you have any questions. (jJ. ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. . Page 4, March 5, 1996 Calculation of Contract Time Extension RW A/lld/EnclosureslTime.388/ xc: Mr. C.A. Sanford, City Manager Mr. Randy Shiflet, Assistant City Manager Mr. Larry Cunningham, Assistant City Manager Mr. Charles Harris, Director of Finance Mr. Mike Curtis, P.E., Capital Projects Coordinator Mr. Ken Matheson, City Inspector Mr. James G. Humphrey, President J.L. Bertram . . J. L' BERTRAM CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING, INC. #./ 1007 Harrison Avenue, Arlington, Texas 76011 .' DŒ©)iò;rn , SF.P ì I99A ~ . . September 2, 1994 Greg Dickens, P.E. city ot North Richland Hills P. o. Box 820609 North Rich1and Hills, Texas 76182 Dear Greg: Due to the delays on strummer Dr. caused by the utility companies, we request an additional 90 calendar days be added to the project. These utility conflictll have not only caused our schedule for 1:·eginning the projeot to be delayed, but have also caused us to .ls8 the prime construction period of July, August and Septe~er. This will result in more of the project beinq constructed durinq winter months when we cannot expect as many workinq days per month. Hope you concur with our request. Sincerely, ~-'~~cS James G. HWllphrey,· President JGH: gn COflCtCfC Pi/"II"" · Ib(Jt:itlr I'.'nng . .~plu/r ~Ic.... · UncMrJ;rrolJnd urililj~ . r,.xl"....' . E"<r,¡vitrion . . . J. L. BERTRAM CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING, INC. ROUTING JOB NO. 1007 Harrison Avenue, Arlington, Texas 76011 Metro (817) 261-2991 ::: - ~2 ~;I; - HC_JFP- ~!:R _ 8DO- GRP LDR ----- - --- GH8 8JY . r-Tt>:9~ ~ January 13, 1995 , Greg Dickens City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182 Re: strummer Drive Dear Greg: In our letter to you dated September 2, 1994, we requested an . additional 90 calendar days to be added to the pr~ject due to delays caused by the utility construction. As of this date, the utilities are still not clear. We therefor request an additional 90 calendar days be added to our request of September 2, 1994. This would result in.180 calendar days being added to the original contract. Please contact us if you wish to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, ~~ 3ámes G. Humphrey President JGH: lmo CC: Richard Albin, P.E., K-E-F Concrt'te PJvins · ¡l¡sphJlt PJvins · ¡l¡sphJlt SJles · Underground Utilities · Truclcins · Excavation CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Library Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Authorize Payment to EBSCO for Subscription Renewal for the Library Agenda Number: PAY 96-14 In the 1996/97 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for miscellaneous subscription renewals. EBSCO is a periodical subscription agent utilized by the Library to manage subscription renewals with the many different publishers of magazines and periodicals annually acquired by the Library. This year the invoice amount is $10,178.56. This invoice covers subscriptions for approximately 165 periodicals, 6 newspapers, 10 reference sources, 10 library journals, and book review sources. This service provides a significant labor saving for library staff and the Library receives an 8% discount on most subscriptions. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council authorize payment to EBSCO in the amount of $10,178.56. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget --X.. Other _ ~ ~~~ epartmÈmt ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number . 01-50-02-2650 Sufficient Funds Available Finance Dlrecto, Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Library Council Meeting Date: 11/25/96 Subject: Authorize Payment to Information ACCA~~ Comp::my Agenda Number: PAY 96-15 In the 1996/97 approved budget, Council appropriated funds for miscellaneous subscription renewals. The Library has a subscription with Information Access Company for their Health Reference Center index. This is an electronic index of current medical information from medical journals, newspapers, periodicals, and selected medical texts from around the world. This service permits Library patrons to access current medical information, which is often out of date before it is published in book form. The subscription amount for the 1996/97 budget is $5,432. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council authorize the payment to Information Access Company in the amount of $5,432. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget -X- Other ~ ~ '/f}v Department Head Signature---'" CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number 01-50-02-2650 Su Icient Funds Available . Finance C_ Page 1 of -..- ;--.A ~ -- ~1 . { 'r < '. ~ ~~ rLcO -uJ ro I I ~J ".J1I. ~ ~ ~ ~.< -~. - So~aJ -"="'''",d a~ "tf)~. T \ ~ !IT I f i 1 ";<1 - · r'<>'~ J.M I1I1I III / TI I_I F~ . ] . .~. '~o;;n - - -Ii Iii -fli¡Ii!L Jp _ J ~'Q ~ Š ~ t ¡----< ,- . f-I !"' ,.,. _ mJ -";NIl t~ ,~~ d:= - þ;;Q fI ~ - :::: :fi:i'I ~ ¡; = ~ u il ~1 ~19 ~ §.J -=H . =- (il~~.. ~ J~I ~ u~J@ ~f- ~ i. ~. ~~ IS ~ :::Iìi[ -, ='C é' ~~;:.. ~~~ .41 =:?, ii. ....! '= .~Iilf " _ 0 _ ~I ~ .. _ o~ ø [; i=! _ .~ @ ~H f: .' . f;-;j '.~ _ -.. II!!J ~ r-y----, -'"" n, ~ J'fI1' !- 'jl ~ -'c ... ~ j~ M;ft - 1- I 1 à .- ~. If'@) = I ., ~ '[!! ~/(!;;1 ,~~ A~ 1'1..., J ~ L,..._ ¡::::¡ = ' ~ ' 'I Q. . '~. . ~ 1'&, I 'I --., W. A f- ,t "N· k:J > " I r"I ~ tí ~ '?~ I- I /,/ ~$ - I ~"" ~¿"'!! @_ it ~ !I!I - 1 E þ : ~ ... I! · t;f,-::d r-LJ ~ _ Q O· - #'1 'ù. W, J" _ > ,----! - e " _. ... \ , , _ 1/1, - ~ .~ ~ - ~ @ ~ \\. >; / Ii( ~--~ H¡;,¡ ;t.. "{ '1\ ~ I'mi1 i: - m' ~~ ·~I.v ~~. _ _ h./"J _ ~ ~ . ¡~J,.-- Ii .:;;: ~ " ~ ,p- "I r- ,- . - I [; ï= t ~ ::£ ;;,.., 1-.. ~ F . rID.r ¡ .bJ.~ 8~ i ~ j I ~ \..: r\!\( ,..."",-, ~~ ~'\\ ':IG) ¿mJ'ê~\H..-1è'J I ~ ~ ~ "~~ ~I ~ ~ ""'~ \ t>-'",- '\ J ~ ~ @ ~t~~ l!i (~ v =;{~'f£' ~~ I~\Ç:-II =- ~ _ _ _ ':::S 1¡¡g<J ..... fm/ ~~. ~~~ l' '/~ I I @¡, ......'¡ I _ . ~ i;'F" I ~ I '" ~ { . e t- f- i I-H ¡ ~ . ~ 1 · ) 8 . i=t nUj _ 1-4 -- ~ ~ . . f ~ -. ~ = I IiI~UJ .~ ; .-- ~Jij fm M I iii ~ I ~ IJ FÞ'À az~ ~ ~ I III J - B~ "i ~,,," -. ì;OI ii1iR _~.. OZlY;" E~ 0; Q.'¡.~ ..},¡~ - $ ~ -'0. -. _"I ' I '!."'~ "'~ V - -- ~ u .,," _. ~ ' - . - · ='-""'...~......'i1 e^l~ 'lf31-1,,) _ ~~ ' ....,..".., """"" ,." . . \' . ¡iJ ~ {tcó i I ~ i J C[ 1_- IQ ~ øa ~ ~ :( \J C. ¡rï ~ CIS 0 , I ~,p CI ::s "1 I I r.~ ~ .~ ~ I : ~¡ ~'B I '-- r. Vi & ._ --i ++ ... > ~ II" Iii ;. ii i II~ . ttt tttti! ijj iii i!i i rl! '11 f.! . :;ãi~,, I/) z o ¡:: <{ ...J :J "~ 10 ~ ~ I·... I ... .,øøt! W ' II' ~ iü ti¡~ ...... .- ..Q ... .£: " W -- ", § .. ,...........,., ~ ! CU, ~, . ,...... r/J. u: . """'1 ~ S cu ..0 u r/J .j. . , .-'" ' ~ ¡ _v.·· , ~\ . , t I::..ø'.: :' ; /1......\ ;, j '~.. ..........."~.~ \ ("" . I " j '...",ç; e;r; )SE." I CE - 10 II:: C ..J W :> <I: II:: l! w 50' nUHr<. ;:)u'"'''' moO ::.t: 1 :17, t"1 )( to 13.6 cD P.OPANí\ <S'~ TANK ª ó' I-- Z W z: w 0.3 ~ VJ .1e:, We <I: )( W V F r() ( I-- - . ~ ..J 0) - I-- 0) :::J r() U1 \ 30 0 EHB:E3.3±E:: 7.5' U.E. J1t1Mtp}(Je ¿eu.e LOT 1, I- U :.15.: l!). TRACT DES JBED TO z~ -Q: L1SA DANETTE McKEE M AND HUSBAND. -J. DANJEL GORD HAM ¡:a.. VOLUME 1243<3. PAGE 165 P.R.T.C.T. :I: ' /8" STEEL ROD FOU D ....~ . , Q:(T\ ~ N 5.-1 I Q: I . /359 ~ I.I..t.J . I-- U 0 c::. z o - w ZONED \ -J (/)-J ~ z: . AG' W CD ~(/) w I VJ ::i 0, ....., <I: t- w - )-<I: cc a:: F w OI- l-- I <I:¡.J 0 l! :I:z Z ..J <I: )( t- (I);::; - Z I-- - ::::> CD :::J iS8,? <I: 0 . . <I: II:: ;.1:~': u io in c en cD if." r-= 0.5 4. 7 <1&s ìl2-4 )( ~13~: <S'c9 ~ L 7.5 UTIUrY EASEMENT N 89° 15' o~" W 5/8" STEEL ROD FOUND_ \ 124. 15' 5.4 ;:12.':. ~ Çu ::r I-- :::J a VJ 5/8" STEEL RCD FOUND ºs . CAJ 7l OJfNER /APPUCANT: USA '/' 7t11i. NOR /It. ~