Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1994-04-11 Agendas Page 2 e NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 8. PW 94-11 Traffic Light Synchronization III Program (5 Minutes) (Agenda Item No. 17) 9. Other Items 10. *Executive Session (30 Minutes) a. Personnel b. Briefing on Pending Litigation c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition 11. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. . *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 11,1994 · For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. e NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting March 28, 1994 5. Presentations by Boards & Commissions a. Beautification Commission Minutes 6. Proclamation - Safety Telecommunication Week 7. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 8. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 & 18) e e e e Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN * 9. PS 94-09 Request of Meadow Lakes North Company for Final Plat of Meadow Lakes North Addition, Phase I (Located south of Browning Drive, west of Iron Horse Golf Course) 10. PS 94-10 Public Hearing - Request of Meadow Lakes North Company for Final Plat of Meadow Lakes North Addition, Phase 1 (Located south of Browning Drive, west of Iron Horse Golf Course) *11. GN 94-35 Approval of Park Construction Coordinator Position *12. GN 94-36 Approve Land Trade Between City of North Richland Hills and J.B. Johnston Affecting the Iron Horse Golf Course - Resolution No. 94-14 *13. GN 94-37 Amendment to the Building Code Regarding Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Existing Building - Ordinance No. 1979. *14. PU 94-31 Contractual Services for Computer Study - LeBlanc & Associates in the Amount of $12,000 *15. PW 94-09 Award of Bid for Teakwood Court Storm Drain Improvements Page 3 . NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *16. PW 94-10 Award of Bid to AII-Tex Paving Inc. for 1994 Chip Seal Program *17. PW 94-11 Traffic Light Synchronization III Program - Resolution No. 94-13 *18. PAY 94-05 Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 1 in the Amount of $47,260.35 to Trac- Work, Inc, for Rufe Snow Drive Railroad Crossing Reconstruction. 19. Citizens Presentation I 20. I Adjournment I I e FC~:'TED ./ I ~ :;7- 9? _____._.-- --.----.. r.:t.!~' 4' t!¡;- , -- ------ ----~-·---~-·:'"-firn2 . CJ. ;ì:~s.;~:'Y __--- Ó'" -7-=:...·· - ..--..--------.-- e e INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL N IR 94-048 O. ^ ;\ ~'>' ¡Date: p I, Subject: April 5, 1994 North Richland Hills Fire Department Inspection I know that you will be interested in the attached letters. It is certainly quite a compliment for our Fire Department. I know that you are as proud of them as we are. Please call if you have any questions or comments. R?4ct¡~¡~Ltted' C.A. sa~forj Deputy City Manager CAS:ph e Attachments e _ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS · N@RTH RICH LAND H ILL S Fire Department Fire Chief e e March 31, 1994 Rodger N. Line, City Manager city of North Richland Hills 7201 NjE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: Fire Department Passes Surprise Inspection by the Texas Commission on Fire Protection Dear Mr. Line, On March 15, 1994, Charles B. Porter and Jerry Swinford with the Texas Fire Commission made a surprise inspection. This inspection entailed the reviewing and hands-on inspection of this department's equipment, training records, and personnel's fire fighting bunker equipment. The Texas Commission on Fire Protection is a state agency which sets standards and makes inspections, insuring paid fire departments comply with these standards. The practice of surprise field inspections has been in place since January, 1993. This was our second surprise inspection wi thin eighteen months, and as usual, we passed with flying colors. I attribute this excellent rating to the fire department administrati ve staff and some key personnel in establishing pOlicies and procedures to adhere to the Fire Commission's guidelines. These surprise inspections make us aware of the responsibility we have to you, members of the city council, members of the fire department, as well as the citizens of North Richland Hills in providing the best fire protection available. I've attached a copy of the letter from Mr. expresses his appreciation for this professional attitude toward the Fire C 7202 Dick Fisher Dr. N. P.O. Box 820609 SRG:cs North Richland Hills. Texas 76182-0609 USA Attachment (817) 581-5670 FAX (817) 656-7551 e Andrew F. Mehl O1airman El Paso Roy Chapman Vice Chairman Abilene David Burkhart Secretary Arlington Ronnie James Wichita Falls Pat Hughes North Richland Hills Armando Caceres Corpus Christi Alonzo Lopez Kingsville Larry McKee Austin Gerald Hood Benbrook Elizabeth Jane Atchley Lefars Steve Perdue Mineral Wells Jan Stalder Parker Michael E. Hines Executive Director Ernest A. Emerson e State Fire Marshal Texas Conunission on Fire Protection P.O. Box 2286 . Austin, Texas 78768-2286 . (512) 873-1700 March 28, 1994 Chief Stan R. Gertz N. Richland Hills Fire Department 7202 Dick Fisher Drive North North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Dear Chief Gertz On behalf of the Texas Commission on Fire Protection, I wish to express my appreciation to you and your staff for the professionalism, support and hospitality shown during our recent inspection of your department. Your support to make the Texas Commission on Fire Protection a viable part of the Texas Fire Service is deeply appreciated. The citizens of your community are fortunate to have the quality leadership you and your department provides during these hard economic times. Your protective clothing program and documentation of records is excellent, well established, and shows your true dedication in providing a department your firefighters can be proud of. If we here at the Commission can be of any assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, ~~ .~ -f?--&- Charles B. Porter Jr - (J Field Representative Standards Compliance Program ~ . . INFORMAL REPORTTO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL N IR 94-050 O. ~ -'i Date: April 5, 1994 Subject: Proposed Median on Rufe Snow Between Loop 820 and Lewis Drive Last fall we met with most of the business leaders on both sides of Rufe Snow. We discussed the possibility of a median being constructed from 820 to Lewis Drive. I felt a little like David in the lion's den - they were alarmed, angry, upset, etc. A study more detailed than the one BartonjAschman had done was suggested. Stanley peskind commissioned a report by the firm of Deshazo, Starek and Tang. He asked if this firm would be acceptable prior to their engagement. We told him we considered them a capable firm. The attached report by Scott Welmaker summarizes both reports which accompany this letter. In summary, I would recommend that we don't construct a median on Rufe Snow at this time. The committee that is looking at our street program is focusing on Rufe Snow plus we have submitted grant applications for additional funding for this project. Please advise if you have questions. Respectfully submitted, (¿ ¿k/~ C.A. Sanford ' Deputy City Manager CAS:ph Attachment ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS + . . . DATE: March 23,1994 MEMO TO: C.A. Sanford FROM: Scott Welmaker, Marketing and Research Coordinator Summary of Traffic Sirnal Operations Analvsis at Rufe Snow @ 820. Deshazo. Starek and Tan~.FebruaryI994 The purpose of the report was to examine traffic patterns and develop traffic flow recommendations. The first issue examined was the accident rate at Rufe Snow and Tapp. Signal coordination has reduced the rate to 1.5 accidents per month, down from 13 accidents per month immediately after installation of the signal. The accident problem appears to be mitigated. The second issue addressed was installation of a median on Rufe Snow from 820 to Lewis. It was suggested that construction of this median will encourage V-turns which may be more hazardous than existing conditions. Traffic volumes of 38,000 vehicles per day were observed. Congestion was noted throughout the day, becoming critical at the peak PM hour. Large numbers of vehicles travel southbound turning left onto the eastbound 820 access road. A corresponding westbound to northbound movement occurs during the same period. The existing demand together with the inadequate number of lanes on the Rufe Snow bridge causes the intersection to operate at an unacceptable level of service (F). The congestion is directly related to the bridge and the signals on the 820 frontage, and not the turning movements proposed to be eliminated by the median. The current signalization at Rufe Snow and Tapp should be maintained until the bridge is widened or traffic conditions change. Other recommendations concentrate on increasing the effective number of lanes on the 820 bridge, and intercepting eastbound traffic demand at Industrial Park and redirecting them to the eastbound ramp located west of Rufe Snow. Council should consider requesting that existing programmed funds by TxDOT ($4.2mm) be redirected to 820 bridge improvements instead of widening Rufe Snow. These funds are estimated to be sufficient. Widening the bridge would be the most cost effective project to increase capacity and enhance traffic flow. Summary of Traffic Impact Analvsis Barton-Aschman Associates. December 1991 This report recommended a median be built from 820 north to Tapp to minimize the negative impact percieved to develop with the opening of the Tapp Value Center. In stating that the Value Center would have a small impact on the traffic, it was noted that Rufe Snow already operated at capacity at peak hours. The report also recommended the traffic signal coordination that the DeShazo report found to be adequate. SW r I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 94-51 e ~ Date: ~ Subject: April 11, 1994 Draft Subdivision Regulations Attached for your information is a copy of the proposed Subdivision Regulations as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Changes to the regulations have been marked to make it easier for noting the differences from the current regulations. The purpose of these modifications is to make the Subdivision Regulations more reflective of the City's current policies regarding subdivision development. The existing regulations were adopted on March 18, 1989. Municipalities adopt subdivision regulations for several reasons. One reason is to comply with State statutes which require a subdivider of property to comply with municipal regulation before a plat is filed in the deed records. Another reason is to require the installation of public utilities prior to the issuance of a building permit. A third reason is to distribute the direct costs of water, sewer and street improvements to the property benefiting from development and not letting it become a burden to the existing residences in the community. Earlier this year, notices were mailed to the active developers, engineers and surveyors operating in North Richland Hills advising them of the proposed new regulations. Fifteen firms requested a copy of the new regulations, and several offered suggestions which were incorporated into the document. No major concerns from the land development sector have been expressed. In summary, the major changes of the regulations are listed as follows: - 1. Establishes separate application procedures for each different type of subdivision plat. This will make it considerably easier for the developer to determine exactly what regulations apply to his particular subdivision. The existing regulations require the developer to decipher a set of complicated rules to determine which rules might apply to replats and which rules might apply to final plats. 2. There is a new section which contains all the public works requirements for a subdivision. Each type of public improvement, such as water and sewer, has its own separate paragraphs to make it easier to identify all the public works improvements required for the proposed development. 3. The drainage study requirements have been clarified by describing a two tiered requirement. For example, a Drainage Analysis is required for preliminary plats and replats. This is a scaled down version of a comprehensive Drainage Study and its purpose is only to determine the need for drainage improvements. The second phase requires a complete Drainage Study after it has been determined that drainage improvements are required. A Drainage Study includes calculations for the sizing of any drainage improvements and a set of engineering drawings of the proposed improvements. It has been difficult in the past for staff to properly advise a applicant on which drainage study requirements were necessary for each phase of a subdivision plat. 4. The new subdivision regulations clarify the requirements for completing construction of certain public works facilities prior to obtaining any building permits. A new paragraph explaining the regulations for Model Homes has been included. 5. Certain administrative regulations have been removed which appeared to be clerical in nature. These regulations will be incorporated into the departmental Standard Operating Procedures manual. - ,fjectfullY SUbmit B ~ Q~ICP Director of Planning and Inspections ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS · e PROPOSED SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MARCH 1994 - e e .) au Z e Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills SECTION 1 POLICIES, PURPOSES AND ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY 1.1 Title These reQulations shall hereinafter be known. cited and referred to as the Subdivision AeQulations of the City of North Richland Hills. Texas and they shall be a part of the Code of Ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills. Texas. 1.2 Authority These Subdivision ReQulations are adopted under the authority of the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas. as promulQated by Chapter 212 of the Texas Local Government Code. as heretofore. or hereafter amended These Subdivision AeQulations are adopted pursuant to the provisions of Article XIV of the Home Rule Charter for the City of North Richland Hill Texas 1.3 Purpose The regulations contained herein are intended to promote and encourage the development of high Quality subdivisions by establishing standards for the provision of adequate IiOht. air. open space. storm water drainage transportation. public utilities. and suitable building lots ThouQh the application of these regulations. the interests of the public. as well as those public and private parties. both present and future. having interest in property affected by these regulations are protected by establishing fair and rational procedures for developing land. These reQulations are desiQned and intended to achieve the following purposes and shall be administered so ä1Q: A. Promote the health. safety morals and general welfare of the City: and B. Promote the orderly development of the City: and C. Provide for adequate light. air. and privacy: to secure safety from fire. flood. and other danQer: to prevent overcrowding of the land and undue congestion of population: and to provide minimum width and depth of building lots and building lines' and o Protect and conserve the value of land throughout the City: and E. Provide the most beneficial circulation of traffic throughout the City. having particular regard to the avoidance of congestion in the streets and highways. and pedestrian traffic movements: and to provide for the proper location and width of streets: and F. Establish reasonable standards of desiQn and procedures for subdivisions and re-subdivisions. in order to further the orderly layout and use of land' and to insure proper legal descriptions and documentation of subdivided land: and G. Insure that public facilities are available for every building site and with sufficient capacity to serve the proposed subdivision. and to provide public facilities for future developments: and H. Assure the adequacy of drainage facilities: and to encourage the wise use and management of natural resources throu<Jhout the City in order to preserve the integrity. stability. and beauty of the community: ill]fJ Section I Policies, Purposes and Administrative Authority Page 1-1 Subdivision Rc¡(ulations City of Nonh Richland Hills - I. Preserve the topography of the City and to insure appropriate development with reCJard to natural features and J. Address other needs necessary for insurinCJ the creation and continuance of a healthy attractive. safe and efficient community that provides for the conservation. enhancement and protection of its human and natural resources. 1.4 Policy In order to carry out the purpose of these regulations. it is hereby declared to be the policy of the City to consider the subdivision of land. and its subseQuent development. as subject to the control of the municipality. pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan. for the orderly. planned. efficient and economical development of the City. Furthermore. it is the policy of the City that: A. ~ B. \IJ ~ C. Land shall not be subdivided. for purposes of development. until proper provision has been made for drainage. water seweraCJe and transportation facilities. All public improvements shall conform to and be properly related to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the City and the Design Manual These regulations shall supplement and facilitate the enforcement of provisions and standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance and building codes adopted by the City. 1.5 Jurisdiction These subdivision regulations shall apply to all subdivisions of land. as defined herein and all land development activities located within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills. 1.6 Conflicts with Public and Private Provisions A. Except where indicated. these reCJulations are not intended to interfere with abrogate. or annul any other public ordinance. rule or regulation. statute. or other provision of law. B These reCJulations are not intended to abrogate any easement. deed restriction. covenant or any other private agreement or deed restriction. 1.7 Repeal of Previous Regulations Upon the adoption of these regulations. the Subdivision Regulations of The City of North Richland Hills adopted March 13. 1989. as amended. are hereby repealed CoB Building Permits A. Plat ReQuired - No Building Permit for residential or commercial construction shall be issued by tAe City for any struoture primary building on a lot if! a subdivisioR, or OR any parcel of property for which a Final Plat has not been approved by the City Council and filed for record in the Deed Records of Tarrant County. except as follows: VI \U ~ ~ e~ V ~ HowÐ'Ior,-Where a primary residential structure exists a Building Permit for rÐoidoRtial oORstruetion eR-8ft to construct an addition to. or renovation of the existing residential structure may be issued on an unplatted lot, provided that the value of such proposed construction, including the cumulative value of any proposed and previously permitted construction permits on the primary structure, does not exceed fifty (50) percent of the current value of the existing structure, excludinQ the value of the land. Section 1 Policies. Purposes and Administrative Authority Page 1-2 ;. Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills e Construction permits as used herein does not include electrical. plumbing or similar non-construction activity. 2. A Building Permit for electrical. plumbing. fence or similar non-construction activities may be issued on an unplatted lot in any zoning district except for building permits which involve structural enclusures. '" .. " ~ ~ o 3. A Building Permit for an accessory structure may be issued on an unplatted lot on Agriculturally zoned property 4. Where a primary non-residential structure exists a Building Permit to construct an addition to. or renovation of the existing non-residential structure may be issued on an unplatted lot. provided that the value of such proposed construction. including the cumulative value of any proposed and previously permitted construction permits on the primary structure does not exceed fifty (50) percent of the current value of the existing structure. excluding the value of the land. Construction permits as used herein does not include electrical. plumbing or similar non-construction activity. B. Public Facilities Available - ~ Building Permits for a primary building will fIet be issued until all proposed public facilities appro'/ed in the cORÐtrl:lction planÐ have been installed and have been inÐpected approved by the Public Works Department. C. Model Homes - A Building Permit may be issued for a single family dwelling to be used as a Model Home when in the opinion of the Building Official and the Public Works Director adequate public services have been made available. SA~~ D. e > The City will not issue Building Permits on any subdivision which remains unproved by the Public Works Department for a period of four years or more from the date of the Final Plat approval until a current engineering review of said plat has been conducted. 1.9 Official City Map The Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall maintain an Official City Map which shall indicate all subdivisions. lots and street right-of-ways. Subdivision plats hereafter approved shall be placed on the Official Map in a timely order. The Official City Map shall include the names of all streets and street suffix classifications. Where street name inconsistencies exist from one subdivision to another. the Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall place on the Official City Map the <;}enerally accepted street name its proper spelling and suffix classification The Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall assign street address ranges for each block and coordinate these with the Office of the Fire Marshal. 1.10 General Construction of language ~ \(a ~ A. For the purpose of these regulations. certain numbers. abbreviations. terms. and words used herein shall be used. interpreted. and defined as set forth in this subsection. B. Unless the context clearly indicates to the contrary. words used in the present tense include the future tense: words used in the plural number include the singular: the word "herein" means "in these regulations": the word "regulations" means ''these regulations." .L C. A "person" includes a corporation. a partnership. and an incorporated association of persons such as a club: "shall" is always mandatory: a "buildin<;}" includes a "structure": a "building" or "structure" includes any part thereof' "used" or "occupied" as applied to any land or building shall be construed to include the words "intended arranged or designed to be used or occupied." Section 1 Policies, Purposes and Administrative Authority Page 1-3 Subdivision Re~ulations City of North Richland Hills e 1.11 Variances The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend variances from these regulations to the City Council upon written request from the subdivider stating the grounds for such variance. Where the City Council finds that extraordinary hardships or practical difficulties may result from strict compliance with these regulations. and / or the purposes of these regulations may be served to a greater extent by an alternative proposal. it may recommend approval of a variance to these subdivision regulations. provided that such variance shall not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of these reoulations' and further provided that the City Council shall not approve variances unless it shall make findings based upon the evidence presented to it in each specific case that: A. The conditions upon which the request for a variance is based are unique to the property and are not applicable generally to other properties. or B. A tract has peculiar physical surroundings. severe topooraphical conditions. or unique environmental Qualities worthy of protection. or C. Where a hardship to the owner would result rather than a mere inconvenience or D The variance will not have an adverse effect on the intent of these provisions or the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 1.12 Enforcement of Regulations A. ~ B. ~ C. D. Appropriate actions may be taken to prevent a violation of these reoulations: to prevent unlawful construction: to restrain. correct or abate a violation' to prevent illegal occupancy of a building structure or premises Furthermore. water meters. sewer taps or other utilities shall not be made available until the provisions of these regulations have been brought into compliance. It shall be the responsibili~ of the Planning and Zonino Coordinator to enforce the administrative provisions of these regulations. It shall be the responsibility of the Building Official to enforce the development provisions of these reoulations. The subdivision of any lot or any parcel of land by the use of a metes and bounds description for the purpose of sale. transfer. or lease with the intent of creating a bUildinQ lot by evadino these regulations. shall be considered as a violation of this Ordinance. All such described subdivisions shall be subject to all of the requirements contained in these reQulations. E. No buildino permit shall be issued for the construction of a buildinQ. or structure. located on a lot or plat subdivided or sold in violation of the provisions of these reQulations. F. The Planning and ZoninQ Coordinator shall be responsible for any interpretation of these regulations and where a determination of these reQulations is in conflict with a request by a developer the Planning and Zoning Commission shall rule and decide on these questions. 1.13 Conformance with Applicable Rules and Regulations e These Subdivision ReQulations shall be held to be the minimum requirements for the development of a subdivision with the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills. In addition to the requirements established herein. all subdivision plats shall be in conformance with the followinQ: A. All applicable State statutory provisions contained in Chapter 212 Texas Local Government Code. Section 1 Policies, Purposes and Administrative Authority Page 1-4 e J ~ ~ Subdivision Regulations 1.14 1.15 SkP\E '"- ~ e City of North Richland Hills B. The zoninQ ordinance. buildinQ and housinQ codes. and other applicable laws of the City. C. The Official Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Capital Improvements Program of the City. Master Drainage Plan. Parks Plan. Master Thoroughfare Plan. and any other official plan adopted by the City Council which has an effect on the subdivision of property in the City. D. Any reQulations of the City and County Health Departments and appropriate state agencies. E. The regulations of the Texas Department of Transportation. when the subdivision. or any lot contained therein. abuts a state maintained highway. F The standards codes and reQulations adopted for administration by the Building Official. Amendments Amendments to these reQulations shall be made by the City Council upon recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The PlanninQ and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall conduct a public hearing on all proposed amendments to these regulations. Said public hearing shall be advertised in a newspaper havin!,;} general circulation in the City at least ten days prior to the public hearing. An amendment may be initiated in one of the following manners: A. Upon a maiority vote of the City Council: or B. Upon a majority vote of the Plannino and ZoninQ Commission: or C. Upon written request from a citizen. Penalties Any person, firm, or corporation who fails to comply with, or violates any of these regulations shall be subject to a fine of not more than Two Hundred ($200) Dollars per day. Each day that such violation continues to exist shall constitute a separate violation. Section 1 Policies. Purposes and Administrative AutJlority Page 1-5 ~lIbdivision Re¡¡ulations City of North Richland Hills e SECTION 2 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR ALL PLATS 2.1 Plat Required It shall be unlawful for a person. firm corporation or organization owning a tract of land located within the cor:porate limits of North Richland Hills to hereafter divide the same tract into two or more parts to layout a subdivision. to layout a building lot. or to layout streets alleys squares. parks. or other parts of the tract intended to be dedicated to public use. or for the use of purchasers or owners of lots fronting on or adjacent to the streets. alleys squares. parks. or other parts for pur:pose of development without having a plat of the subdivision prepared and approved according to these subdivision regulations. A division of a tract includes a division regardless of whether it is made by using a metes and bounds description in a deed of conveyance or in a contract for a deed. by using a contract of sale or other executory contract to convey. or by usinQ any other method for pur:pose of development. A division of land under these reQulations does not include a division of land into parts Qreater than five acres. where each part has access and no public improvement is beinQ dedicated. The provisions of these subdivision regulations shall apply to any development which is intended as a sinQle lot. tract or parcel where a primary structure will be located. Futhermore. no land shall be subdivided for purposes of development until: A. A Preliminary Plat. when applicable. in the format as described within these regulations. has received approval from the Planning and ZoninQ Commission' and i ~ B. A Replat. Amended Plat. Short Form Plat or Final Plat. when applicable. in the format described within these regulations. has received approval from the PlanninQ and Zoning Commission and the City Council: ª-illt C. The approved Replat. Amended Plat. Short Form Plat or Final Plat. when applicable. has been filed with the County Clerk 2.2 Classification of Plat Submittals Whenever a subdivision of land is proposed the Planning and ZoninQ Coordinator will advise the applicant whether or not the review procedures of a Preliminary Plat. Final Plat. Amended Plat. Short Form Final Plat or Replat will apply and supply the applicant with the appropriate application forms. 2.3 General Platting Procedures The platting procedures for a subdivision include the following steps completed in the sequence listed below: A. Preliminary Plat - The submission of a Preliminary Plat Application to the Planning and Zoning Commission. with subsequent approval thereof. is a prerequisite to the submission of a Final Plat The minimum requirements for a Preliminary Plat submittal are contained in Section 4. "Requirements for Submittal of a Preliminary Plat". B. ZoninQ Change - Submission of an Application for a Zoning District Change to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. with subsequent approval thereof. is required where the current zoning classification is not compatible with the type of development beinQ proposed. This procedure may be concurrent with the submittal of the Preliminary Plat. Section 2 General Provisions for all Plats Page 2-1 Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills e C. Final Plat - Submission of a Final Plat Application to the PlanninQ and ZoninQ Commission and the City Council. with subsequent approval thereof. is required prior to the filing of a Final Plat with the Tarrant County Clerk's Office The minimum requirements for a Final Plat submittal are contained in SectionS. "Requirements for Submittal of a Final Plat". D. Filing of Plat - Upon approval of a Final Plat by the City Council. the Final Plat may be filed for with the Tarrant County Clerk's Office E. Construct Public Improvements - Upon approval of the Final Plat by the City Council and authorization from the Public Works Director. the developer may procede with the construction of all public improvements. The requirements for public improvements are contained in Section 3 "Requirements for Public and Semi-public Improvements". 2.4 Approval of City Council Required No improvements shall be initiated and no permit for the erection of a structure shall be Qranted until the subdividing owner. or his authorized agent. shall apply for and obtain approval of such proposed subdivision from the City Council. and every subdivision plat considered by the City Council shall have received prior approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission. 2.5 Application Form and Content ~ ~~ The subdividing owner. or his authorized agent shall submit a written application for a subdivision to the City on the proper forms furnished by the Planning and Zoning Coordinator. Written consent shall be required from the legal owner of the premises if the applicant is not the owner of record The lack of information under any item specified herein. or improper information supplied by the applicant. shall be cause for disapproval of a Preliminary Plat. 2.6 Official Submission Dates No subdivision plat shall be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission until ithas been determined that the submittal is complete and in conformance with the requirements of this Ordinance. For the pUlpose of these regulations. the date of the regular meetino of the Planning and Zoning Commission at which the approval of the Plat is to be considered shall constitute the official submittal date of the plat from which the statutory period requiring formal approval or disapproval of the plat shall commence. Unless a waiver is requested by the developer. action shall be taken by the Planning and Zoning Commission within 30 days. 2.7 Coordination of Zoning Application with Subdivision Approval Every subdivision plat shall be consistent with and conform to existino zoning regulations and the following criteria: A. No subdivision plat will be submitted to the Plan nino and Zoning Commission for approval which contains any inconsistent zoning classification. However. this requirement may be waived when an application for a zone change seeking proper zoning classification has been filed with the Planning and Zoning Commission. B. In the event that a change in the zoning classification is required to accommodate the proposed development. it is the intent of these regulations that subdivision review be carried out simultaneously with the review of any zoning application. C. No subdivision lot shall be approved which is bisected by a zoning district boundary. unless said lot contains multiple types of uses. Section 2 General Provisions for all Plats Page 2-2 e 2.8 SAI"'e - "> AI! tal. sltJ'l\!: ~ 3ubdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills 2.9 2.10 2.11 ~.!W7 Taxes and Liens Paid Prior to the consideration of a subdivision plat by the Planning and Zoning Commission, any delinquent taxes and any outstanding liens due the City of North Richland Hills must be paid. Plat Application Fees Application fees for Preliminary Plats. Short Form Final Plats. Amended Plats and Final Plats shall be established by separate ordinance approved by the City Council. Frontage on Improved Roads Required No subdivision shall be approved unless the area to be subdivided has a minimum of fifty (50) feet of contiguous frontage on and access to an existing public street, or an acceptable public access approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and such access meets the minimum street construction requirements contained in the Design Manual. Where such street does not meet said minimum standards, the owner shall construct that portion of the street which provides public access and frontage to the subdivision, or provide a cash escrow to the City for the estimated cost of improvement. Vacation of Plats All actions for vacation of a plat shall be consistent with applicable State statutes as contained in Chapter 212. Texas Local Government Code (see Appendix C). e 2.12 Plats Straddling Municipal Boundaries IiÞ-l Whenever access to a subdivision is required across land situated in an adjacent municipality. the Planning ""-- ~ and Zoning Commission may require written approval from the affected City. .13 Processing Preliminary Plats .. t ~ .." e 2.14 A. Upon receipt of a Preliminary Plat, all required documents, and payment of all required filing fees, the Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall check the Preliminary Plat for completeness. No Preliminary Plat shall be processed for review which is determined to be incomplete. B. The Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall coordinate the review of all subdivision plats with the applicable municipal departments and public utility companies. Upon completion of the staff review and receipt of any responses to comments from the developer, the subdivision plat may be placed on the next available meeting agenda for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. C. After the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the Preliminary Plat, the applicant shall be advised of any required changes and / or additions and upon satisfactory completion of any imposed requirements by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the applicant may proceed with the submittal of a Final Plat. Effective Period of Preliminary Plat Approval The approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission of a Preliminary Plat shall be effective for a period of one (1) year. If a Final Plat Application has not been submitted on at least a portion of the area covered by the Preliminary Plat within one (1) year from the date of the approval of the Preliminary Plat by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Preliminary Plat shall be declared null and void. If in the event that only a portion of the Preliminary Plat has been submitted for Final Plat action, those areas not platted within three (3) years Section 2 Genera! Provisions for a! I Plats Page 2-3 ~uhdivision Regulations e 2.15 i ~ ~ -L E. C",\)~E- ~ City of North Richland Hills of the date of Preliminary Plat approval shall be declared null and void, unless an extension of time is granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Any portion of a Preliminary Plat not receiving final approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council within the period of time set forth herein shall be declared null and void, and the developer shall be required to resubmit for preliminary approval and such resubmittal shall be subject to any new subdivision regulations and pay any applicable fees. Processing Final Plats, Amended Plats, or Replats A. Upon receipt of a Replat, Amended Plat, Short Form Final Plat, or Final Plat, all required documents, and payment of all required filing fees, the Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall check the submittal for completeness. No Replat, Amended Plat, Short Form Plat, or Final Plat shall be processed for review which is not determined to be complete. No Final Plat shall be processed for review for any area in which a Preliminary Plat has not been previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 8. The Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall coordinate the review of all subdivision plats with the applicable municipal departments and public utility companies. Upon completion of the staff review and receipt of any responses to comments from the developer, the subdivision plat may be placed on the next available meeting agenda for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. C. If applicable under these regulations, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold any required public hearing on the plat in conformance with Section 212.015 of the Texas Local Government Code. Such hearing shall be advertised in a newspaper having general circulation within the City at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. D. After the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the Final Plat, the applicant shall be advised of any required changes and / or additions. The Planning and Zoning Commission may either, (1) approve the plat as presented, (2) approve the plat with conditions, or (3) disapprove the plat. When the Planning and Zoning Commission has approved the plat, it shall be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. Upon satisfactory completion of any conditions required by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the plat submittal shall be placed on the next available agenda for consideration by the City Council. Disapproval of the plat by the Commission shall be final. The City Council shall approve a plat. according to Section 212.010 of the Texas Local Government Code. if it conforms to the general plan of the city and to these regulations. However, the City Council may disapprove a plat which does not conform to the general plan or to these regulations. Any disapproval shall be deemed a refusal by the City to accept the offered dedications shown thereon. Furthermore, the action of the City Council shall be final in the consideration of the proposed plat. 2.16 Official Filing and Recording Final Plats #' ~ eL Upon approval of the plat by the City Council, the Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall proceed with the official filing of record procedures using the following guidelines: A. The signature showing final approval of the plat shall not be affixed until all taxes, assessment charges and other monetary obligations due to the City have been paid. 8. The Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall obtain the necessary signatures from the Mayor, City Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission Chairman and Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary. The Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall verify that all required covenants have been accepted by the applicant prior to submitting the plat to the Tarrant County Clerk's Office for filing. C. Requirements for filing plats in the Tarrant County Clerk's Office are contained in Appendix 8. Page 2-4 Section 2 Genera! Provisions for a! I Plats ~bdivision Regulations e r f ~ l e e City of North Richland Hills D. Upon receipt of the official filed plat, the Planning and Zoning Coordinator will place a mylar film copy in the City Plat File showing the official filing notation from the Tarrant County Clerk's Office. F. Approval of the plat by the City Council, and receipt of the official filed copy from Tarrant County, authorizes the Developer to proceed with the installation of the public facilities in the subdivision provided such plans have been approved by the Public Works Director. G. The City shall maintain on file one mylar, or similar reproducible original copy, containing original signatures. Page 2-5 Section 2 General Provisions for all Plats e J ~ -( ~ ~ l.. 3.2 ~ ~ -L Subdivision RegulatIOns City of Nonh Richland Hills 3.3 SECTION 3 REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS General Infrastructure Policy A. The developer shall install all water and sewer systems street and drainaQe facilities and any other facilities required by these regulations which are necessary for the proper development of the subdivision. The design construction and inspection of any public or semi-public improvements shall be borne by the developer All such facilities shall be desiQned and constructed in accordance with the Design Manual and be in conformance with the Qeneral layout of the City of North Richland Hills Master Plan. as adopted by the City Council. B. Where considered necessary by the Public Works Director the facilities shall be sized in excess of that dictated by the Design Manual to provide for the future Qrowth and expansion of the City systems Where oversizing of public facilities is required or where the relocation of public facilities is required. or where specific public or semi-public improvements are necessary for the proper development of the subdivision. the developer of the proposed subdivision shall construct or relocate said public or semi-public facilities. C. Where. in the opinion of the Planning and Zoning Commission. construction of said public or semi-public facilities should be deferred to a future date. then the developer shall place in escrow with the City an amount equal to the estimated cost of the improvements as determined by the Public Works Department. The PlanninQ and Zoning Commission may recommend alternate arrangements to the City Council when appropriate. D. When a tract of land is proposed for development and public improvements are to be installed between or paralleling two or more tracts of land under different ownership and participation is required by both owners, the developer desiring to plat his land first shall comply with the following: 1. If the public improvements are required for the actual development of the subdivision, then the first developer shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary right-or-way or easements from the adjoining property owner or owners and for installing those improvements at his own expense. 2. If the improvements are not required for the actual development of the subdivision, then the developer shall provide, within his subdivision, all of the easements or right-of-way necessary for the improvements. Water Facility Requirements The developer shall furnish. install. construct or extend at his own expense. water distribution facilities necessary for the Droper development of the subdivision. The water system shall provide individual service to every lot in the subdivision. All water mains constructed within a proposed subdivision shall be extended to the perimeter of the proposed subdivision to allow for future extension of the water system into adiacent properties. The water system shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the specifications contained in the Desi<;¡n Manual. Where considered necessary by the Public Works Director. the facilities shall be sized in excess of that dictated by the Design Manual to provide for the future <;¡rowth and expansion of the City water distribution system. In addition. the water system shall conform to the City's current Water Distribution System Capital Improvements Plan. City Participation in Water System Oversizing Where oversizinQ of water system improvements is required by the Capital Improvements Plan City participation in any proposed water line shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Water and Sewer Section 3 Requirements for Public and Semi-public Improvements Page 3-1 e 3 ~ ~ e Subdivision Re~ulations City of North Richland Hills Impact Fee Ordinance. City participation will not be available for water lines which are not part of the proposed improvements contained in the Capital Improvements Plan. 3.4 Fire Hydrant Requirements The developer shall install. at his own expense. a sufficient number of fire hydrants to provide fire protection service to every lot in the subdivision. The fire hydrant system shall be desÍ<Jned according to the specifications contained in the Desion Manual The layout of the system shall be determined by the Public Works Director and approved by the Fire Marshal 3.5 Sewage Facility Requirements The developer shall furnish. install. construct. or extend. at his own expense sewage collection facilities necessary for the proper development of the subdivision The sewage system shall provide individual service to every lot in the subdivision. All sewer mains constructed within the proposed subdivision shall be extended to the perimeter of the proposed subdivision to allow for future extension of the sewer system into adiacent properties regardless of whether or not such extensions are required for service within the subdivision. The sewaQe system shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the specifications contained in the Design Manual. Where considered necessary by the Public Works Director the facilities shall be sized in excess of that dictated by the Design Manual. to provide for the future growth and expansion of the City systems All sanitary sewer installations shall be in conformance with the City's Wastewater System Capital Improvements Plan. 3.6 City Participation in Sewer System Oversizing Where oversizing of sewer system improvements is required by the Capital Improvements Plan. City participation in any proposed sewer line shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Water and Sewer Impact Fee Ordinance City participation will not be available for sewer lines which are not a part of the proposed improvements contained in the Capital Improvements Plan. 3.7 Utilities to be Constructed in Right-of Ways All public utilities shall be constructed within a public street right-of-way or an appropriate utility easement. When a proposed water or sewer line or a drainage facility will be placed adiacent to a public road maintained by the Texas Department of Transportation. a separate specific use easement document shall be provided for each utility or drainage facility. 3.8 Street Right-of-Way Dedication Each subdivision plat shall dedicate public street rioht-of-way of sufficient width to comply with the standards contained on the Master Thoroughfare Plan and the following requirements: A. All street right-of-ways shall be integrated with the existinQ and proposed system of thoroughfares and right-of-ways B. Every lot shall front on a public riQht-of-way which complies with the width shown on the Master Thoroughfare Plan or when approved by the City an acceptable public access easement. C. Street right-of-ways shall be configured so as to allow for future access to adiacent properties. Section 3 Requirements for Public and Semi-public Improvements Page 3-2 e ~ \l1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Subdivision Regulations CilV of North Richland Hills 3.9 Street Improvement Requirements The developer shall construct. at his own expense. street facilities necessaty for the proper development of the subdivision. The street system shall provide access to every lot in the subdivision. and comply with the followin9: A All street surfaces within or abutting the proposed subdivision shall be paved. with curbs and Qutters installed. and otherwise constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications contained in the DesiQn Manual. B. All paving shall be constructed to the width specified by the "Functional Classification" of streets as contained in the most current revision of the Master Thoroughfare Plan. C. Permanent dead-end roads shall not be allowed. D Proposed new streets shall be laid out. where possible. so as to eliminate or avoid new perimeter half- streets. 3.10 City Participation in Thoroughfare Street Improvements The City will only participate in the construction costs of a Collector or Arterial street as designated by the Master Thoroughfare Plan and be located in conventional single-family residential areas When the Public Works Director has determined that the need for additional street capacity is not directly attributable to the traffic pattern of the proposed development. the City may participate in the portion of the roadway in excess of thirty-six (36) feet measured from curb face to curb face. The developer shall pay for thirty-six (36) feet of roadway includinQ any extra depth of pavement. curb and gutter for both sides. all excavation required. all subQrade preparation and all other costs involved in the street construction. including engineering costs When a street is required to be constructed with extra width or special conditions by the City for aesthetic value or special circumstances. the City will participate on the same basis as in thoroughfare considerations Where the oversizinQ of the street is at the discretion of the developer for aesthetic purposes or special considerations no participation is allowed In non-single-family residential areas. when existing development would require additional strength design or additional width of pavement to accommodate expected traffic use no City participation is allowed. 3.11 Perimeter Street Requirements (3.12 Where an existing perimeter street is adjacent to a proposed new subdivision. the developer shall establish the location of the street centerline and dedicate sufficient right-of-way within his own subdivision to provide one half of the street riQht-of-way width shown on the Master Thoroughfare Plan The developer shall construct one half of the required street according to the standards contained in the Design Manual Sidewalk Requirements Every new subdivision, or re-subdivision hereafter approved, shall be required to install sidewalks, with appropriate curb ramps, adjacent to all public street rights-of-way. Construction of any sidewalk shall conform to the standards and specifications contained in the Design Manual. Sidewalk placements shall conform to the following: A. All corner lots shall have sidewalks placed on the two frontages or sides adjacent to the streets. B. Any triple frontage lots shall have sidewalks placed on the three frontages or sides adjacent to the streets. Section 3 Requirements for Public and Semi-public Improvements Page 3-3 Subdivision Regulations e City of North Richland Hills C. Any double frontage lots shall have sidewalks placed on the two frontages adjacent to the streets. D. Construction of all side yard sidewalks and rear yard sidewalks adjacent to perimeter streets shall be the developers responsibility to construct after plat approval. Front yard sidewalks shall be constructed for each lot prior to completion of any primary structure. 3.13 Masonry Screening Wall Requirements (Semi-Public Improvement) Every newly platted residential or non-residential subdivision or re-subdivision of lots adjacent to a C4U thoroughfare, or larger, as shown on the prevailing Master Thoroughfare Plan, shall comply with the screening wall requirements as provided in this Section. A. The developer of any lot located in a newly platted residential subdivision, or re-subdivision of existing residential lots, adjacent to a C4U thoroughfare, or larger, as shown on the prevailing Master Thoroughfare Plan, shall be required to construct a masonry or concrete screening wall along and adjacent to said thoroughfare. However, a Aeplat of an existing one lot residential subdivision on a Colløetor ª-Wi street is exempt. ~ ~e developer of any lot located in a newly platted non-residential subdivision, or re-subdivision of lots, ~ which have a rear property line adjacent toa C4U thoroughfare, or larger, as shown on the prevailing ~ Master Thoroughfare Plan, shall be required to construct a masonry or concrete screening wall along and " adjacent to said thoroughfare. II ~ J e 3.14 C.\\\""~ ~ r-15 I' .,~ l C. The masonry or concrete screening wall shall be constructed in a manner consistent with the standards and specifications contained in the Design Manual. Any combination of wrought iron and landscaping at street intersections, or entrances to subdivisions, shall be considered as an acceptable alternate material. Except for landscaping materials, no masonry or concrete screening wall or its foundation shall be constructed within the street right-of-way. D. Any masonry screening wall constructed within the City of North Aichland Hills which is not required by Section 3.14 A or 3.14 8 of this Ordinance shall be constructed in a manner consistent with the standards and specifications contained in the Design Manual. Drainage Improvement Requirements The developer shall be required to furnish, install, construct, or extend, at his own expense, all storm sewers and drainage structure facilities necessary for the proper development of the subdivision. Concrete channel improvements shall be required where specified in the Master Drainage Plan and in the Design Manual. Alternate earthen channels may be approved when in accordance with the criteria established in the Design Manual. All public drainage facilities shall be constructed within a public draina<}e easement or drainage right- of-way as required by the City. Off-Site Drainage In respect to off-site drainage, the following provisions shall apply: A. The developer shall be responsible for all runoff from fully developed property upstream of the proposed development. B. Where a drainage study indicates that additional runoff from the developing property will overload downstream drainage facilities and result in hazardous conditions, the City may withhold approval of the development until appropriate provisions have been made. These provisions shall include any drainage design or construction plans necessary to accommodate the off-site drainage problem. Section 3 Requirements for Public and Semi-public Improvements Page 3-4 Subdivision Rel!.ulations 3.16 e I\I~~ ~ 3.17 ~t t.,,~ e (3.18 ~l 3.19 ~ L 3.20 Sf(~~ ~ 3.21 .~ ('¡ty of North Richland Hills Street Lighting The developer shall furnish. install. construct. or extend at his own expense street lighting facilities necessary for the proper development of the subdivision. The street lighting system shall comply with the location and spacing requirements for street liQhting systems contained in the Design Manual City - Developer Agreements A. In the event that the Developer of a proposed subdivision requests participation by the City in the construction of the public facilities, and that participation is approved by the City Council, and the total participation costs by the City exceed five thousand ($5,000) dollars, then the Developer must execute a City-Developer Agreement as contained in Appendix A of these regulations. In developments where, by reason of City policy, the City Council deems it advisable to participate in the community facilities being constructed to the extent of five thousand ($5,000) dollars, or more, the contract for such construction shall always be advertised for bids in accordance with the City's Charter, and shall require the execution of a City-Developer Agreement as noted above. The Developer shall deposit with the City the funds or acceptable security as required by the applicable City Ordinances required to pay his portion of the construction costs prior to the construction. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to prepare all contract documents for the use of the City and the contractor, as well as all copies of the Engineering Plans for the bidding and construction of the project. B. On projects not requiring City-Developer Agreement, the Final Plat approval authorizes the Developer to proceed with construction of the water, sewer, street drainage, and traffic facilities required by the Engineering Plans, provided that such plans have been approved by the Public Works Director. All construction shall be in accordance with the applicable sections of this Ordinance. The Developer may choose his own contractor subject to the contractor executing the necessary bonds with the City and payment of the inspection fees required for each portion of the public facilities. Temporary Improvements The applicant shall build and pay for all costs of temporary improvements required by the Public Works Department and shall maintain same for a period specified by the City. Maintenance Bond Requirements The developer's contractor shall be required to file a maintenance bond with the Public Works Director. prior to beginning construction by the City. in an amount and form satisfactory to the Public Works Director. in order to assure the satisfactory condition of the required improvements for a period of two (2) years after the date of their acceptance by the City. Public Works Construction Permit Required Construction shall not start on any street, sidewalk, drainage, utility or public improvement until a Public Works Construction Permit and an acceptable two (2) year maintenance bond has been issued for all facilities in the subdivision or the approved phase of the said subdivision. Inspection of Proposed Public Facilities The Public Works Department shall provide for inspection of required public improvements during construction and insure their satisfactory completion. If the Public Works Director finds UDon inspection that any of the required improvements have not been constructed in accordance with City construction standards and specifications the applicant shall be notified that building permits will not be issued until all inconsistencies Secûon 3 Requirements for Public and Semi-public Improvements Page 3-5 Subdivision Regulations .r ìJ 3.22 ~ L (23 I ~ l e e City of North Richland Hills have been corrected All construction debris or waste shall be removed from all areas of the subdivision prior to the issuance of the Letter of Completion of Public Improvements by the Public Works Department. Final Walk-Through and Construction Debris The developer of a subdivision shall arranC.;Je for a final walk-throuC.;Jh inspection with the Buildin<;.1 Official. No cut trees. timber. debris. rocks. stones. iunk. rubbish. or other waste materials of any kind shall be buried in any land. or left or deposited on any lot or street at the time of completion of public facilities. Removal of all debris and waste shall be required prior to approval and acceptance of all public improvements and prior to the issuance of any building permit or certificate of occupancy. Letter of Completion of Public Improvements A. The governing body will not accept dedication of required improvements until the Public Works Director has provided written certification that all required improvements have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with construction plans for the subdivision and are ready for dedication to the City and are free and clear of any and all liens and encumbrances. Upon such approval and recommendation, the City shall thereafter accept the improvements for dedication. B. Upon approved completion of the construction of the public facilities, the Developer's engineer shall submit to the Public Works Department a complete set of "as-built" documents of the project along with a complete accounting of all construction units "as-built" and the total project cost. The Public Works Department will then issue a Letter of Completion of Public Improvements to the developer and authorize the release of the subdivision for the issuance of building permits. Section 3 Requirements for Public and Semi-public Improvements Page 3-6 e ~ ~ e 4.3 «6 ~4.4 ~ trL Subdivision Regulalions C¡IV of North Richland Hills SECTION 4 REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT 4.1 Preliminary Plat Approval Required All applicants seeking approval of a Preliminary Plat shall comply with the requirements of this Section. Every Preliminary Plat shall require approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The procedures contained i~ this Section shall be used when the property being proposed for development is considered "an unplatted tract" and which is not currently developed into platted lots and blocks. and filed for record in the Tarrant County Clerk's Office as a previously platted subdivision of record The developer shall show all factors necessary to enable the Planning and Zoning Commission to determine whether the proposed subdivision is satisfactory from the standpoint of the public interests and be consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. the Zoning Ordinance and these Subdivision Reoulations 4.2 Optional General Development Plan When a proposed development is a portion of a larger tract under one ownership or is to be developed in phases. the developer may submit a General DeVelopment Plan for review to obtain conceptual approval by the Plannino and Zoning Commission in coniunction with or prior to submittal of a Preliminary Plat. When appropriate. more than one tract or subdivision may be included with the General Development Plan The General Development Plan will allow the Planning and Zoning Commission to review proposed major thorouohfare street patterns. land uses and relationships with adjoinino areas. A General Deveíopment Plan shall be construed to be a detailing of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The General Development Plan should contain the following information: A. Proposed land uses by area with a tabulation summary of acres and units per acre densities. B. A layout of adjacent properties showing existing platted properties and the names of owners of unplatted ~ C. Locations of all existing features such as streets. drainage channels. easements or other physical features which may influence the development pattern of the property D. The locations of any Collector or Arterial Streets as shown on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. Platting Land Under Same Ownership Every Preliminary Plat shall include all the land which the applicant proposes to subdivide and all contiguous tracts owned under the same ownership. This requirement will enable the Planning and Zoning Commission to, (1) determine the need for public improvements or easements which may be required on portions of the land and make future subdivisions uneconomical to develop if the improvements are not installed as a part of the land being proposed for development, and (2) plan for or require reservations for future rights-of-way. This requirement may be waived by the Planning and Zoning Commission when the proposed subdivision appears to have no impact on, or from, the contiguously owned property which is not being developed. Phasing Development A. The Preliminary Plat shall indicate any phasing of the proposed development with a heavy dashed line. Each phase shall be numbered sequentially and in the proposed order of development. The proposed utility and drainage layout for each phase shall be designed in such a manner that the phases can be developed in numerical sequence. Thereafter, plats of subsequent units of such subdivision shall Section 4 Re{ uiremeols for SubmiuaJ of a Preliminary Plat Page 4-1 Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills e t 4~')r B. conform to the approved overall layout and phasing, unless a new Preliminary Plat is submitted. However, a subsequent reduction of a phase may be considered provided that it conforms to the original street arrangement. The Planning and Zoning Commission may impose such conditions upon the filing of the phases as it may deems necessary to assure the orderly development of the city. Preliminary Plat Documents Required The application packet shall include all documents listed below and no Preliminary Plat will be reviewed by the City until all required documents are submitted in a completed format and all fees have been paid. A letter requesting any variances from these regulations shall be submitted when applicable. · Preliminary Plat Application (See Section 4.6) · Preliminary Plat Drawing (See Section 4 7) · Preliminary Drainage Analysis (See Section 4.8) · Preliminary Utility Layout (See Section 4.9) · Taxes and Liens Paid Certificates (See Section 4.10) 4.6 Preliminary Plat Application The applicant shall submit a written Preliminarv Plat Application to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator not less than thirty-five days prior to the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission for which approval is being SOU9ht. Written authorization from the owner shall be furnished when the applicant is not the owner of record. 4.7 Preliminary Plat Drawing J 'U ~ The applicant shall submit the required number of copies of the Preliminary Plat Drawin9 as indicated by the Preliminary Plat Application. The Preliminary Plat DrawinQ shall contain at a minimum all the information listed in the "Technical Specifications of All Plat Drawin9s" contained in Section 9.1 and include all the information listed as "Additional Requirements for Preliminary Plat Drawings" contained in Section 9.2 of these regulations. 4.8 Preliminary Drainage Analysis The applicant shall submit a Preliminary Drainage Analysis of the subdivision area to determine the need for drainage facilities within the area being considered for development or off-site on adjacent properties. The Preliminary Drainage Analysis shall conform to the technical specifications contained in the Design Manual. 4.9 Preliminary Utility Layout The applicant shall submit a Preliminary Utility Layout to show the general location and approximate sizees of all existing and proposed public utilities The size of all proposed water and sewer lines shall be determined usin9 methods prescribed in the Desi9n Manual. 4.10 Taxes and Liens Paid Certificates The applicant shall submit a certificate available from the Planning and Zoning Coordinator indicating that e any delinquent taxes or liens due the City of North Richland Hills have been paid. Section 4 Requirements for Submittal of a Prel iminary Plat Page 4-2 Subdivision Regulalions _( 4.11 ~~ ~ 4.12 L e e City of North Richland Hills Review. Processing and Approval of Preliminary Plat Every Preliminary Plat shall be reviewed for conformity with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. these regulations and any other applicable ordinance according to the procedures established for "Processing of Preliminary Plats" as contained in Section 2 13 of these regulations. GradinQ of Site Prior to Final Plat Approval Subsequent to Preliminary Plat approval. the developer may request written approval from the Public Works Director to commence construction to the grades and elevations required by the construction plans. Section 4 Requiremenl5 for Submittal of a Preliminary Plat Page 4-3 e , t ~ ..,., e , Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills SECTION 5 REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF A FINAL PLAT 5.1 Final Plat Approval Required Every Final Plat shall require approval of the City Council, but only after approval has been previously obtained from the Planning and Zoning Commission. 5.2 Conformity With Preliminary Plat The Final Plat and accompanying data shall conform to the Preliminary Plat, as approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, incorporating any and all changes, modifications, alterations, corrections and stipulations imposed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Any submittals of a Final Plat which do not constitute a full phase as shown on the Preliminary Plat must be consistent with the Preliminary Plat in design and layout. Additional review time may be required where a Final Plat does not constitute a full phase as shown on the Preliminary Plat. 5.3 Final Plat Documents Required The application packet shall include all documents listed below and no Final Plat will be reviewed by the City until all required documents are submitted in a completed format and all fees have been paid. · Final Plat Application (See Section 5.4) · Final Plat Drawing (See Section 5.5) · Drainage Study (See Section 5.6) · Engineering Drawings (See Section 5.7) · Tax and Lien Certificates (See Section 5.8) 5.4 Final Plat Application The applicant shall submit a written Final Plat Application to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator not less than thirty-five days prior to the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission for which approval is being sought. 5.5 Final Plat Drawing The applicant shall submit the required number of copies of the Final Plat Drawing as indicated on the Final Plat Application. The Final Plat Drawing shall contain, at a minimum, all the information listed in the "Technical Specifications of All Plat Drawings" contained in Section 9.1 and include all the information listed as "Additional Requirements for Final Plat Drawings" contained in Section 9.3 of these regulations. 5.6 Drainage Study When the Preliminary Drainage Analysis has determined that drainage facilities and related improvements are required, the applicant shall submit a Drainage Study with engineering drawings which shall conform to the technical specifications contained in the Design Manual. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall not recommend for approval any Final Plat which does not provide adequate facilities to accommodate storm or flood water runoff. Section 5 Requirements for Submittal of a Final Plat Page 5-1 Suhdivision Regulations ·r 5.7 Lc, (: 5.8 ~ '" 5.9 L e e City of North Rich/and Hills Engineering I Construction Drawings When the City has determined that public improvements are required, the applicant, or his engineer, shall submit construction plans for all public improvements along with the Final Plat for approval by the City. The Engineering drawings shall conform to the requirements of Section 1-01 of the Design Manual and shall be prepared and sealed by a Registered Professional Engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Texas. Taxes and Liens Paid Certificates The applicant shall submit a certificate, available from the Planning and Zoning Coordinator, indicating that any delinquent taxes or liens due the City of North Richland Hills have been paid. Review, Processing and Approval of Final Plat Every Final Plat shall be reviewed for conformity to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, these regulations and any other applicable ordinance according to the procedures established for "Processing of Final Plats" as contained in Section 2.15 of these regulations. Section 5 Requirements for Submittal of a Final Plat Page 5-2 e e '- £ ~ V\ e Subdivision Regulations City of Nonh Richland Hills SECTION 6 REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF A REPLAT 6.1 Replat Approval Required Every Replat shall require approval of the City Council, but only after approval has been obtained from the Planning and Zoning Commission. A Replat is required any time it is proposed to subdivide a previously approved subdivision, or portion thereof, into smaller lots or, to combine existing smaller lots or tracts into a larger tract. The procedures contained in this section shall be used when the tract being proposed for redevelopment, or portion thereof, is currently developed into platted lots and blocks, and filed for record in the Tarrant County Clerk's Office as a platted subdivision of record, and the owner is requesting to redevelop the property into a new configuration. 6.2 Replat Documents Required The application packet shall include all documents listed below and no Replat will be reviewed by the City until all documents are submitted in a completed format and all fees have been paid. · Replat Application (See Section 6.3) · Replat Drawing (See Section 6.4) · Taxes and Liens Paid Certificate (See Section 6.5) · Preliminary Drainage Analysis or Drainage Study (See Section 6.6) · Utility Layout or Engineering Drawings (See Section 6.7) 6.3 Replat Application The applicant shall submit a written Replat Application to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator not less than thirty-five days prior to the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission for which approval is being sought. 6.4 Replat Drawing The applicant shall submit the required number of copies of the Replat Drawing as indicated by the Replat Application. The drawing shall contain, at a minimum, all the information listed in the "Technical Specifications of All Plat Drawings" contained in Section 9.1 and include all the information listed as "Additional Requirements for Replats, Amended Plats, Short Form Plats, and Final Plat Drawings" contained in Section 9.3 of these regulations. No Replat may be approved which does not contain the signatures of all the affected property owners within the area being considered for redevelopment. 6.5 Taxes and Liens Paid Certificates The applicant shall submit a certificate available from the Planning and Zoning Coordinator indicating that any taxes or liens due the City of North Richland Hills have been paid. 6.6 Preliminary Drainage Analysis or Drainage Study Due to the variable conditions of a Replat, the Public Works Director will review the submittal and may require the applicant to submit a Preliminary Drainage Analysis or a Drainage Study of the subdivision area which shall conform to the technical specifications contained in the Design Manual. The applicant may be exempt from this requirement when the Public Works Director is satisfied that no drainage facilities are necessary or where a previously prepared Drainage Study has been approved within the previous four year period. Section 6 Requirements for SlIbmiUal of a Replat Page 6-1 e ~ ~ ~ ~ 6.8 6.9 L e e Subdivision RegulatIOns City of North Richland Hills 6.7 Utility Layout or Engineering Drawings The applicant shall submit a Utility Layout to show the location and sizes of all existing and proposed public utilities to verify easement requirements. However, when the Public Works Department has determined that the proposed redevelopment of the subdivision will require public facility improvements, the applicant, or his engineer, shall submit engineering plans for all public improvements for approval by the City as a prerequisite to the approval of the plat by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Furthermore, when a Aeplat results in the reconfiguration of Jots so as to impact the location of any existing water, or sewer tap locations, the developer shall submit sufficient information regarding the location of the existing taps and provide for any utility adjustments so as to assure the availability of utility services to each lot. Any Engineering drawings associated with a Aeplat shall conform to the requirements of the Design Manual. Review, Processing and Approval of Replats Every Replat shall be reviewed for conformity to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, these requirements and any other applicable ordinance in accordance with the procedures established for "Processing of Replats" in Section 2.15 of these regulations. Replat Public Hearing Requirements Certain replats are required to comply with the public hearing regulations contained in Section 212.014 and Section 212.015 of the Texas Local Government Code. A copy of these sections from the Texas Local Government Code is contained in Appendix C of these regulations. Section 6 Requirements for Submirtal of a Replat Page 6-2 e e ~ ~ ~ 7.3 7.4 e Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills SECTION 7 REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF A SHORT FORM FINAL PLAT 7.1 Short Form Final Plat Approval Required Every Short Form Plat shall require approval of the City Council, but only after approval has been previously obtained from the Planning and Zoning Commission. The procedures contained in this Section shall be used when the property being proposed for development is considered "an unplatted tract" and which is not currently developed into platted lots and blocks, and filed for record in the Tarrant County Clerk's Office as a previously platted subdivision of record and when the property being platted contains no drainage problems and will contain only one lot after approval. 7.2 Short Form Final Plat Prerequisites A Short Form Final Plat may be submitted on a property when all of the following requirements are met: A. There is an existing building on the lot which is capable of being occupied as a legal residence or business. B. The lot contains no apparent drainage problems or contributes to or may cause a drainage problem on another tract. The Public Works Director will review the Master Drainage Plan of the City in relation to the proposed lot to determine whether a Drainage Analysis will satisfy this provision. However, when it has been determined that drainage improvements will be required. the applicant must submit a Drainage Study which complies with the criteria specified in the Design Manual. C. The subject tract contains five acres of area or less. D. The lot fronts on a paved dedicated street. Additional right-of-way shall be dedicated if needed. E. All utilities required to serve the lot are in place. or arrangements to provide the same have been made with appropriate easements shown on the plat. F. No engineering or construction drawings are required. Short Form Final Plat Documents Required The application packet shall include all documents listed below and no Short Form Final Plat will be reviewed by the City until all required documents are submitted in a completed format and all fees have been paid. · Short Form Final Plat Application (See Section 7.4) · Final Plat Drawing (See Section 7.5) · Preliminary Drainage Analysis (See Section 7.6) · Taxes and Liens Paid Certificates (See Section 7.7) Short Form Final Plat Application The applicant shall submit a written Short Form Final Plat Application to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator not less than thirty-five days prior to the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission for which approval is being sought. Section 7 Requirements for Submittal of a Short Form Plat Page 7-1 e I(, ~ ~ e e 7.7 7.8 Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills 7.5 Final Plat Drawing The applicant shall submit the required number of copies of the Final Plat Drawing as indicated by the Final Plat Application. The Final Plat Drawing shall contain, at a minimum, all the information listed in the "Technical Specifications of All Plat Drawings" contained in Section 9.1 and all the information listed as "Additional Requirements for Final Plat Drawings" contained in Section 9.3. 7.6 Preliminary Drainage Analysis The Public Works Director will review each request for a Short Form Final Plat and determine whether the applicant shall be required to submit a Drainage Analysis or Drainage Study. When required, the Drainage Analysis or Drainage Study shall conform to the technical specifications contained in the Design Manual. The applicant may be exempt from this requirement when the Public Works Director is satisfied that no drainage facilities are necessary. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall not recommend for approval any Short Form Final Plat which does not provide adequate facilities for storm or flood water runoff. Taxes and Liens Paid Certificates The applicant shall submit a certificate available from the Planning and Zoning Coordinator indicating that any taxes or liens due the City of North Richland Hills have been paid. Review, Processing and Approval of Short Form Final Plat Every Short Form Final Plat shall be reviewed for conformity to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, these regulations and any other applicable ordinance according to the procedures established for Processing of Final Plats in Section 2.15 of these regulations. Section 7 Requirements for Submittal of a Short Form Plat Page 7-2 Subdivision Regulations Cily of Nonh Richland Hills e SECTION 8 REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF AN AMENDED PLAT 8.1 Amended Plat Approval Required Every Amended Plat shall require approval of the City Council, but only after approval has been previously obtained from the Planning and Zoning Commission. The procedures contained in this Section shall be used to correct a subdivision plat which has been previously filed in the Tarrant County Clerk's Office. 8.2 Amended Plat Prerequisites An Amended Plat submittal may be submitted on a property when it conforms to the requirements of Section 212.016 of the Texas Local Government Code. 8.3 Amended Plat Documents Required The application packet shall include all documents listed below and no Amended Plat will be reviewed by the City until all required documents are submitted in a completed format and all fees have been paid. ~ « · Amended Plat Application (See Section 8.4) · Final Plat Drawing (See Section 8.5) 8.4 Amended Plat Application The applicant shall submit a written Amended Plat Application to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator at least fourteen (14) days prior to the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission for which approval is being sought. 8.5 Final Plat Drawing The applicant shall submit the required number of copies of the Final Plat Drawing as shown on the Amended Plat Application. The Final Plat Drawing shall contain, at a minimum, all the information listed in the "Requirements of All Plat Drawings" contained in Section 9.1 and include all the information listed as "Additional Requirements for Final Plat Drawings" contained in Section 9.3. 8.6 Review, Processing and Approval of Amended Plat Every Amended Plat shall be reviewed for conformity to the regulations contained in Section 212.016 of the Texas Local Government Code. e Section 8 Requirements for Submittal of an Amended Plat Page 8- I Subdi vision Regulations e City of North Richland Hills SECTION 9 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLAT DRAWINGS 9.1 Requirements for all Plat Drawings C. D. e E. ~ ~ F. Every plat drawing shall include the following items: A. Adjacent Properties - All property lines, streets and easements on lands immediately adjacent to and contiguous with the perimeter of the proposed subdivision and extending one hundred (100) feet shall be shown with the names of the owners as shown in the most current Tax Assessor's files; if the adjacent properties are platted, the names of adjoining subdivisions and the names of adjoining streets are to be shown. B. Building Set-Back Lines - Front building set-back lines shall be indicated by dashed lines on all lots in accordance with the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance for the appropriate zoning district. Side yard building set-back lines shall be indicated by dashed lines on the side yards of lots with side street frontage. Additional building set-back may be required by the Planning and Zoning Commission when sound planning principles apply. Existing building set-back lines on adjacent properties shall be shown, where applicable. City Limit Lines - The location of the Corporate Limit boundaries of the City of North Richland Hills or any adjacent city shall be shown on the plat drawing where applicable. Date - The date in which the drawing was prepared shall be shown on the plat drawing. Easements - The location and dimension of all existing or proposed easements shall be shown on the plat drawing indicating whether such easement is for any specific purpose. General easements for the use of public utilities of not less than seven and one-half (7.5') feet in width shall be provided along each side of all rear property lines. If necessary for the extension of water or sewer mains, storm drainage or other utilities, easements of greater width may be required along lot lines or across lots. In all cases, easements shall connect with easements already established in adjoining properties or extend to connect with a public right-of-way. No lot shall be shown with an easement which prevents proper development and full utilization of the lot as a suitable building site for the intended zoning district. Lot and Block Numbering - All lots and blocks shall be consecutively numbered, or lettered in alphabetical order. The blocks in subdivisions bearing the same name shall be numbered or lettered consecutively through the several sections or phases. Lettering for blocks shall be larger and bolder than lot numbers or circled to make identification clear. Any lot or block which is planned as an 'out-parcel' shall be numbered and designated on the plat with notation regarding any development restrictions. G. Map Sheet Size - Map sheets shall be of such size as are acceptable for filing in the office of County Clerk, but shall not exceed twenty-four by thirty-six (24"x 36") inches, or eighteen by twenty-four (18" x 24") inches, with a binding margin of not less than one and one-half inches on the left side of the sheets. Sheets shall be numbered in sequence if more than one (1) sheet is used and an index sheet provided with match lines. H. North Arrow - A north arrow indicating the approximate true north shall be predominantly placed near the scale. I. Ownership I Developer - The name, address, and telephone number of the current legal owner, and the name, address, and telephone number of the developer, if other than the owner shall be shown on the plat drawing. Section 9 Technical Specifications for Plat Drawings Page 9-1 Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills e J. Plat Notes and Conditions - When appropriate, the drawing shall contain a listing of any Plat Notes and Plat Conditions in a readily identifiable location with each note numbered consecutively. K. Public Use Areas - The location and dimensions of all property proposed to be set aside for park use, or other public or common reservation shall be shown on the plat drawing, with designation of the purpose thereof, and conditions, if any, of the dedication or reservation. L. Scale - The drawing shall be prepared at a numerical scale no greater than one (1) inch equals one hundred (100) feet. At the discretion of the Public Works Director, the plat may be drawn at a numerically smaller scale, i.e. l' = 50', 1" = 40', etc. if the plat can still be drawn on the required sheet size. A graphic scale symbol shall be placed on the drawing. M. Street Names - All existing and proposed street names shall be shown on the plat drawing. New street names shall be sufficiently different in sound and in spelling from other road names in the City so as to not cause confusion. A road which is, or planned, as a continuation of an existing road shall bear the same name. ~ I.a1 e :< N. Street Right-of-Way - The width of all existing and proposed public street rights-of-way shall be shown on the plat drawing and be consistent with the minimum requirements contained in the Design Manual and the Master Thoroughfare Plan. Dimensions shall be shown for all curves. The distance from the centerline of any existing roadway of a boundary street to the proposed subdivision shall be shown to determine the adequacy of right-of-way along the route and to determine if additional right-of-way is necessary to accommodate the proposed street. Sufficient iron pins shall be found or set and shown on the drawing together with dimensions to adequately describe all perimeter streets. O. Subdivision Boundary - The proposed subdivision boundary lines shall be shown in heavy lines so as to provide a differentiation with the internal features of the area being proposed for platting. The location and dimensions of all boundary lines of the property shall be expressed to the nearest hundredth foot. P. Subdivision Name - The name of the proposed subdivision with letters predominantly larger letters than those used elsewhere shall be shown on the drawing, preferably within the Title Block. The proposed name of the subdivision shall not be a duplication of any existing subdivision name, whether by spelling or pronunciation, or similar to any other subdivision within the City unless the proposed subdivision is contiguous with a subsequent filing or a replat of an existing subdivision. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have final authority to designate the name of the subdivision. a. Surveyor Information - The name, address and telephone number of the professional land surveyor who prepared the plat drawing shall be shown on the plat drawing. The plat drawing shall contain the seal of the land surveyor who shall be registered in the State of Texas as a Registered Professional Land Surveyor. R. Title Block - Preceding the name of the subdivision shall be a Title Block indicating whether the plat is a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Replat, or Amended Plat. S. Vicinity Location Map - A small vicinity location map shall be shown on the plat drawing. The vicinity location map shall be drawn at an approximate scale of 1"= 2000' and show sufficient streets, Collector and Arterial Street names, and major features of the surrounding area to locate the area being subdivided. tu~ T. .~ '^ Surveyor's Certification - Every plat drawing shall contain a Surveyor's Certification of Compliance by a Registered Professional Land Surveyor. The Certification of Compliance shall not be less than one and one-halfinches high and four inches wide and contain the following information: Section 9 Technical Specifications for Plat Drawings Page 9-2 Subdivision Regulations e '-b ~~ V1 City of North Richland Hills KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That I, , a Registered Professional Land Surveyor licensed in fhe State of Texas, do hereby certify thaf fhis Plat is true and correnl and was prepared from an actual survey made under my supervision on the ground, Signature Dafe (Affix Seal) 9.2 Additional Requirements for Preliminary Plat Drawings In addition to the minimum information required of all plat drawings contained in Section 9.1 of these regulations, every Preliminary Plat Drawing shall include the following information: A. Permanent Structures - The location and general outline of any existing permanent or temporary structures with sufficient dimensions to determine building line encroachments shall be shown on the plat drawing. B. Sectionalizing or Phasing of Plats - The plat drawing shall indicate any sectionalizing or phasing of the proposed subdivision. Thereafter, plats of subsequent units of such subdivision shall conform to the approved overall layout and phasing, unless a new Preliminary Plat is submitted. However, a subsequent reduction of a phase may be considered provided that it conforms to the original street arrangement. ~ e\a1 < C. Zoning Classification - The plat drawing shall indicate the current zoning classification of the proposed subdivision and all adjacent properties. D. Lot Dimensions - The approximate dimensions of all proposed or existing lots with sufficient detail to verify compliance with the specific requirements of the Zoning Ordinance shall be shown on the plat drawing. E. Flood Plain Features - The location of the 100-year flood limits, if applicable, shall be shown on the Preliminary Plat drawing. If the subdivision or a portion thereof is located in a 100 year flood-prone area, the developer will be required to comply with the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. F. Certificate of Approval - Every Preliminary Plat Drawing shall contain a Certificate of Approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Certificate of Approval shall not be less than one and one-half inches high and four inches wide and contain the following information: \u È~ ~ e'" WHEREAS The Planning and Zoning Commission 01 the CUy 01 North Richland Hilis,Texas voted affirmatively on this _ day of , 19 10 approve Ihis PrelimimllY Pial. Chainnan, Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission Section 9 Technical Specifications for Plat Drawings Page 9-3 Subdivision Regulations e J ~ ~ e City of North Richland Hills 9.3 Additional Requirements for Replats, Short Form Plats, Amended Plats, and Final Plat Drawings Every Replat, Short Form Plat, Amended Plat, or Final Plat drawing shall include the following information in addition to the minimum information required of all plat drawings contained in Section 9.1 of these regulations. A. Metes and Bounds Description - A written metes and bounds description of the property shall be shown on the plat drawing that will readily determine the location, bearing and length of all perimeter boundary lines, and be capable of reproducing such lines upon the ground with a closure error of less than 1 :25,000. The Legal Description shall include reference to an original surveyor subdivision corner, and the Texas NAD83 State Plane Coordinate System. The Legal Description shall include the acreage of the total area of the proposed subdivision and be consistent with the subdivision boundary. Information to show the last instrument conveying title to each parcel of property involved in the proposed subdivision, giving grantor, grantee, date, and land records reference. B. Global Positioning System (GPS) Horizontal Control Survey - The Final Plat shall include the NAD83 Texas State Plane Coordinates for a minimum of two corners of the subdivision. The coordinates shall be determined by a survey tied to the City's GPS monuments located within the City. Written descriptions of the GPS Benchmarks are available from the Public Works Department. C. Lot Dimensions - The exact dimensions of all proposed or existing lots and perimeter boundary of the subdivision shall be shown on the plat drawing. D. Lot Areas - The area for each lot expressed in square feet shall be shown on the plat drawing. (This information may be shown in tabular form on the plat.) E. Irregular Side Lot Lines - Side lot lines which are not perpendicular to the street right-of-way shall be indicated with bearing and distances. F. Permanent Structure Encroachments - Any permanent structures which encroach any building set-back lines and will remain after completion of the development shall be shown on the drawing with appropriate dimensions. G. Drainage Easements - The location of any drainage easements, if applicable, shall be shown on the plat drawing. If the subdivision or a portion thereof is located in the 100 year flood-prone area, the developer will be required to comply with the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. H. P & Z Approval Certification - Every Replat, Amended Plat, Short Form Plat or Final Plat shall contain a Certificate of Approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Certificate of Approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall not be less than two inches high and four and one-half inches wide and contain the following information: UJ ~~ \f) e Whereas the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Cny of North Richland Hills, Texas voted affirmatively on this _ day of , 19 to recommend approval of this Plat by the Cny Council. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission Section 9 Technical Specifications for Plat Drawings Page 9-4 Subdivision Regulations e ~ E:. <t. V\ e City of North Richland Hills I. Tarrant County Certification - Any Certification block required by the Tarrant County Clerk's Office for filing. (See Appendix B) J. Dedication Certificate - Every Replat, Amended Plat, Short Form Plat or Final Plat shall contain an Owners Certificate of Dediætion as follows: KNOW All MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, I, (owners name) do hereby certny that I am the legal owner of the above described tract ot land and do hereby convey to the public for public use; the streets, alleys, rights-of-way, and any other public areas shown on this plat. OWners Name STATE OF TEXAS II COUNTY OF TARRANT II Before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for said county and State on this day personally appeared , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and considerations therein expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. Given under my hand and sea! of oNice this _ day of ,19 Notary Public in and for Tarrant County (affix seal) My printed name My commission expires: K. City Council Approval Certification - Every Replat, Amended Plat, Short Form Plat or Final Plat shall contain a Certificate of Approval by the City Council. The Certificate of Approval by the City Council shall not be less than two inches high and four inches wide and contain the following information: Whereas the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas voted affirmatively on this day of ,19 to approve of this Plat for filing of record. Mayor, City of North Rlchland Hills Attest: City Secretary Section 9 Technical Specifications for Plat Drawings Page 9-5 e e ~ ~ ~ e Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills SECTION 10 SUBDIVISION DESIGN CRITERIA 10.1 Conformity with Zoning Regulations Every lot shall be designed in such a manner that it complies with the minimum dimensions of the applicable zoning district as contained in the Zoning Ordinance. 10.2 General Design Criteria Every Subdivision Plat shall be reviewed by the City for conformance with the design criteria contained in this Section. The City recognizes that suitability characteristics vary from site to site and the Planning and Zoning Commission shall provide oversight in their interpretation, application and enforcement of these criteria. A. Access from Major Thoroughfares - Where a residential subdivision borders or contains an existing or proposed thoroughfare, as shown on the Master Thoroughfare Plan, residential lots shall not in general, where possible, have frontage onto or derive access directly from an existing or proposed C2U Collector Street, or larger. Non-residential lots which have frontage onto or derive access directly from an existing or proposed C2U Collector Street, as shown on the Master Thoroughfare Plan, shall have driveway locations which comply with the spacing requirements contained in the Design Manual. B. Block Depths - Blocks should have sufficient depth to provide for two (2) tiers of lots of appropriate depths. Exceptions to this prescribed block depth may be permitted in blocks adjacent to major streets, railroads, waterways or city limit lines. The use of a public alley shall be limited to non-residential subdivisions. C. Block Lengths - Block lengths in residential areas shall not exceed fifteen (15) times the minimum lot width required in the zoning district or 1,000 feet long without an intersection with another street. Blocks designed for industrial uses may be of such length and width as determined suitable and appropriate by the Planning and Zoning Commission for the prospective use. In long blocks, the Planning and Zoning Commission may require the reservation of an easement through the block to accommodate utilities, drainage facilities, or pedestrian traffic. When such an easement is required, additional width shall be included in the adjacent lots. D. Buildable Area - Every residential lot proposed for development shall contain a buildable area which contains, at a minimum, 125 percent of the minimum structure square footage required for the applicable zoning district. The buildable area shall be situated out of the 100 Year Special Flood Hazard Area. E. Character of the Land - Land which the Planning and Zoning Commission finds to be unsuitable for subdivision or development due to flooding, improper drainage, steep slopes, rock formations, adverse earth formations or topography, utility easements, or other features which will reasonably be harmful to the safety, health, and general welfare of the present or future inhabitants of the subdivision and / or its surrounding areas, shall not be subdivided or developed until adequate methods are formulated by the developer and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission to solve the problems created by the unsuitable land conditions. F. Conformity With Comprehensive Land Use Plan - Every subdivision plat shall conform to the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, other applicable City standards. G. Corner Clip - At all street intersections, there shall be provided a minimum ten (10) foot by ten(10) foot corner clip sidewalk and utility easement diagonal to the street right-ot-way lines. Section 10 Subdivision Design Criteria Page 10-1 e .~ ~ e Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills H. Corner Lots - Additional lot width should be considered for corner lots to allow for two street frontage set- back lines. I. Cul-de-sac length· No street may be designed to be dead-ended without the installation of a cul-de-sac with a fifty (50) foot right-of-way radius and a forty (40) foot pavement radius back to back of curb. No cul- de-sac street may exceed five hundred (500) feet in length, as measured along the street centertine from the projected curb intersection to the farthest curb location. J. Double Frontage Lots - Double frontage and reversed frontage lots shall be avoided except where necessary to provide separation of residential development from Collector or Arterial Streets or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. The Planning and Zoning Commission may require that a provision be placed on the plat to limit the facing of main structures or limit driveway access from any Collector or Arterial Street. K. Drainage Easements and Right-ot-Ways - The City will adivse the developer when to utilize either a drainage easement or a drainage right-of-way to accommodate drainage facilities in the subdivision. When a Drainage Easement is utilized, lot lines shall be drawn to the center of the drainage easement and the drainage easement shown with a dashed line. Any lot which contains a drainage easement shall be designed so as to have a buildable area that is, at a minimum, 125 percent of the minimum square footage required for the applicable zoning district. The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve an alternate plan whereby the drainage area is designated as a separate lot or shown as a drainage Right-of- Way with public conveyance notation. When a Drainage Right-of-Way is utilized, lot lines shall not extend within the limits of the drainage Right-of-Way. L. Grading and Lot Drainage - Residential lot grading shall be conducted in a manner which will not allow runoff to cross more than two lots, including the lot on which the drainage originates, betore it enters a street or drainage easement. If this is not possible, then a drainage easement must be provided and any necessary facilities shall be constructed and installed by the developer. Lots shall be laid out so as to provide positive drainage away from all buildings. Individual lot drainage shall be coordinated with the general storm drainage pattern for the area. M. Intersection Angles - Spacing of intersections along major streets shall conform to the Design Manual. Not more than two (2) streets shall intersect at anyone point unless specifically approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Proposed new intersections along one side of an existing street shall, wherever practicable, coincide with any existing intersections on the opposite side of such street. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles. Intersections which are not right angles shall use the following criteria: 1. A proposed intersection of two (2) new streets at an angle of less than seventy-five (75) degrees shall not be acceptable. An oblique street intersection or curved street approaching an intersection should be approximately at right angles for at least one hundred (100) feet therefrom. 2. Street jogs with center-line offsets of less than one hundred and fifty (150) feet shall not be permitted, except where the intersected street has separated dual drives without median breaks at either intersection. N. Lot Dimensions. - Lot dimensions shall be consistent with the minimum standards of the Zoning Ordinance. Proper design of a subdivision requires that side lot lines be at right angles to street lines or as a radial. However, lot lines which are not at right angles to street lines, or shown as a radial, shall contain a bearing notation. Dimensions of corner lots shall be large enough to allow for erection of buildings, observing the minimum front and side-yard setback from both streets. Depth and width of properties reserved or laid out for business, commercial, or industrial purposes shall be adequate to Section 10 Subdivision Design Criteria Page 10-2 e e~ (0 ~ e Subdivision RegulatIons City of North Richland Hills provide for the off-street parking and loading facilities required for the type of use and development contemplated, as established in the Zoning Ordinance. O. Masonry Screening Walls - Masonry screening walls shall be constructed adjacent to any residential thoroughfare designated as C4U, or larger, on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. No screening wall shall be constructed within the street right-of-way. P. Multiple Entrance and Exit Locations - Where possible, every subdivision containing forty (40) or more lots shall provide for two or more entrance and exit locations. a. Right-ot-Ways - Right-of-Way widths shall be consistent with those shown on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. Right-of-Way widths in excess of the standards designated on the Master Thoroughfare Plan shall be required whenever, due to topography, additional width is necessary to provide adequate earth slopes. Futhermore, street right-of-way widths in commercial, industrial and similar high intensity land use areas shall be appropriate for the type of development being proposed, but no street in such area shall be less than the minimum required for a C2U Collector Street. R. Water bodies - If a tract being subdivided contains a water body, or portion thereof, lot lines shall be drawn so as to distribute the entire ownership of the water body among adjacent lots. The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve an alternative plan whereby the ownership of and responsibility for safe maintenance of the water body is so placed that it will not become a local government responsibility. Furthermore, any lot which includes a water body shall contain a buildable area that is, at a minimum, 125 percent of the minimum square footage required for the applicable zoning district. Section 10 Subdivision Design Criteria Page 10-3 e . \I.. ~ ~ V\ e Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills SECTION 11 STREET AND EASEMENT VACATIONS When a citizen, group of citizens, or developer wishes to propose the closing or vacation of a specific public right-of- way, street, or easement, which is currently in use, the following procedures must be followed: A. A petition requesting the proposed closing or vacation must be presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission together with the appropriate filing fee. Such petition must contain the signatures of all property owners holding property adjacent to the portion of the street or easement which is proposed to be vacated. In addition, a Standard Form of Vacation Acknowledgement shall be completed and submitted for each utility currently located within the right-of-way or easement. B. The Planning and Zoning Coordinator will set a Public Hearing of the proposed closing before the Planning and Zoning Commission at a regularly scheduled meeting. Public notices will be mailed to all property owners affected by the proposed closing or vacation at least fifteen (15) days prior to the scheduled meeting. C. The Commission will conduct a Public Hearing allowing the opportunity for interested parties to express their opinions of the proposed closing or vacation. At the close of the Public Hearing the Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council as to the advisability of approving the proposed closing or vacation. D. The proposed closing or vacation will then be set for Public Hearing before the City Council by the following notices: 1. The hearing will be noticed by the publishing of a legal notice in the official newspaper of the City at least thirty (30) days prior to the scheduled Hearing. 2. Adjacent property owners will be notified by mail of the proposed Public Hearing at least thirty (30) days prior to the scheduled Hearing. 3. Notice of the proposed Hearing before the City Council will be posted in three (3) public places within the City at least thirty (30) days prior to the scheduled Hearing. E. The City Council will conduct the Public Hearing on the proposed closing or vacation allowing the opportunity for all interested parties to express their opinions on the matter. At the close of the Public Hearing, the City Council will make a determination whether the evidence presented at the Hearing and the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission provide sufficient justification for proceeding with the closure or vacation. F. If the City Council determines that the vacation or closure should proceed, the City Staff will be instructed to perform the following: 1. Secure an appraisal of the value of the physical property involved in the closure. 2. Advertise and accept bids for the sale of the vacated right-of-way or easement. 3. Prepare and submit to the City Council for execution documents for sale of the property involved in the vacation or closure. Section II Street and Easement Vacations Page II-I ~ \U ~ e e Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills SECTION 12 INSTALLATION OF PERMANENT FIELD MONUMENTS 12.1 General The applicant shall place permanent reference monuments in the subdivision as required herein and under the direction of a Registered Land Surveyor or Professional Engineer. All such monuments shall be set flush with or below the ground and planted in such a manner that they will not be generally disturbed. 12.2 Subdivision Boundaries The external boundaries of a subdivision shall be documented in the field by monuments of not less than four (4) inches square or five (5) inches in diameter, and marked on top with a cross, brass plug, iron rod, or other durable material securely embedded; or by iron rods or pipes not less than twenty-four (24) inches in length and five-eighths (5/8) inches in diameter. These monuments shall be placed at all corners of the subdivision boundary, at each end of all curves, at the point where a curve changes its radius, at all angle points in any line, and at all angle points along a meandering line. 12.3 Internal Block Corners All internal block corners, street intersections, street angle points and curves tangents shall receive permanent monuments in the field by iron rods or pipes at least thirty (30) inches long and one (1) inch in diameter. 12.4 Lot Corners All corners of all lots shall receive monuments in the field by iron rods 18 inches long and 1/2 inch in diameter. Section 121nstaIJation of Permanent Field Monuments Page 12·1 e ., ~ ~ ~ o qJ ~ ~ ~ ~ e Subdivision Regulalions City of Nonh Richland Hills SECTION 13 DEFINITIONS 13.1 Definitions in General All definitions of words contained herein shall correspond with the most appropriate definitions appearing in the Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, unless specifically defined in this Section. 13.2 Words and Terms Defined For purposes of these regulations, certain terms herein are defined as follows: A. Alley - A minor public right-of-way primarily designed to serve as secondary access to the side or rear of properties whose principal frontaQe is on some other street not iAtcndcd to pro'fide tl'le primary mcans of access of abuttin!1J lots, which is used primarily for vehicular service access to tl10 bacl< or sides of propÐr1ics otl1orwise abuttiA!=j on a Gtreet. B. Applicant - The owner authorized representative. or desiQnated agent of land being proposed for subdividing. C. Block - A tract of land bounded by streets or by a combination of streets. public parks. cemeteries. railroad riQhts-of-way. shorelines of water-ways. or boundary lines of municipalities and containing one or more buildin<; sites. D. Bond - A form of security other than a cash deposit to be used as surety or as a <; uarantee. E. Building - Any structure which is built for the support shelter. or enclosure of persons animals. F. Buildin<; Official - The senior buildin<; officer of the City charQed with responsibility for issuinQ building permits and enforcinQ the buildinQ code. G. Building Set-back Line - TAe liAe witl:liA a pFO geFty aefiAiA!=j tAe miAimum AorizoRtal eliGtaRee Bct'NeeR a bt:JileliAg sr otl'lcr structure over 24" l1i§A and tl1e adjaeeAt street property liRe A line established beyond which no part of a building shall project. except as otherwise provided in the zoninQ ordinance. H. City - The City of North Richland Hills, Texas. I. City Attorney - The licensed attorney desiQnated by the City to furnish legal assistance for the administration of these reQulations. J. City Council - The leQislative e;¡overnine;¡ body of the City havine;¡ the power to adopt and amend these re<; ulations K. City Engineer - A Registered Professional Engineer on the City Staff or a consultin<; firm of Registered Professional COAst:JltiR!=j Engineers '/iRa l:Ia\'Ð s 9Ðeifieally BeeR sesigRateel as rC 9reseAtiR!=j tRe City BY neselutieA of tAe City Council desiQnated to represent the City. L. Collector Street - A major road intended to move traffic from local roads to minor arterials A collector road generally surrounds a neiahborhood or a Qroup of neiQhborhoods. M. Comprehensive Land Use Plan - A written document containin<; the development policies of the City including a map of the City showing a Qraphic representation of the proposed uses of the various land Seclion 13 Definitions Page 13-1 e ~ ~ ~ . u ... ~ .... \û ~ ~ ~ e Subdivision Regulations City of Nonh Richland Hills areas of the City and which has been adopted by the City Council as the official guide for future development. N. Construction Plans - The maps or engineering drawings accompanying a subdivision plat and showing the specific location and design of improvements to be installed in the subdivision in accordance with the requirements of the Design Manual. o. Crosswalk Way - A public right of way, usually four (4) feet or more in width between property lines. which provides pedestrian circulation. P. Cul-De-Sac - A .lQçaLstreet hO'..iAg but with only one outlet to aAotRor stroot. ami tOfFFIiAatcd OA the opposite OAd by S vCRieular turAaroLlAa and havinQ an appropriate terminal for the safe and convenient reversal of traffic movement. a. Dead-End Street - A street, other than a cul-de-sac, with only one outlet. R. Design Manual - Refers to the City of North Richland Hills Public Works Design Manual which establishes minimum criteria for the desiQn of Public Works/Utilities improvements. TRis is a separate dooumont wAich cstablisAcS lTIiRiml:l1Tl eritoria for oppr-o'..oblo dosigR of Public WorlŒ/Utilitios ImpFOvcmoRts for tho City of Nofth nichlûAd Hills S. Developer - The official applicant or alJent representinQ the owner of any plat being proposed for subdivision and being a person havinQ an interest in land and causes it to be divided into a subdivision. T. Development Review Committee - A committee composed of municipal department representatives to provide technical services in the administration of these regulations. U. Drainage Flume - A concrete drainage way usually centered on lot lines and desilJned to carry storm water runoff from adjoininQ lots. v. Easement - Authorization by a property owner for the use by another. and for a specified purpose of a desiQnated part of his property. such as a drainage easement utility easement or a public access easement. W. Engineer - A person duly authorized under the provisions of the Texas Engineering Practices Act, as heretofore or hereafter amended, to practice the profession of Civil Engineering. x. Escrow - A deposit of cash still in force on a performance or maintenance bond. Y. Final Plat - (Also necord Plat or FiliR!!I Plat) The ORC official and authentic map or official plan of record of a subdivision of land of SAY §iveA prepared from actual field measurement and staking of all identifiable points by a Registered or Liccnscd Professional Land Licensed Surveyor with the subdivision location properly referenced to a survey corner or specific landmark reference. All bOl::lAdsÄÐs, COrRcrs or CUNes of the laAa divisioA shall bc suffieicAtly descFibed so that tRey ean be reproduced witAol:lt additioAal rcforeAeos Z. Frontage - The side or sides of a lot abuttin<) a street right-or-way. AA. FrontaQe Street - Any street to be constructed by the developer or any existinQ street in which develooment takes place on both sides. BB. Highway. Limited Access - A freeway or expressway. providing a traffic way for through traffic in respect to which owners or occupants of abuttinQ property on lands and other persons have no Section 13 Definitions Page 13-2 e ~ ~ ~ o ! ~ ~ e Subdivision Regulations City of Nonh Richland Hills authorized riç¡ht to access to or from the same. except at such points and in such manner as may be determined by the public agency having iurisdiction over such traffic way. CC. Land Planner - Persons other than Surveyors or Engineers who a!se possess and can deFf10nstrate a valid profieieney in the Planning or FÐaic:IeAtial, eOFf1Ff1cmial, indLJotrial and athÐr rolatÐd dO'/olopFf1Ðnta; SlieR profieiency having been aeqLJirÐd by education in the field of rlanAin§ or Lan8scape AI'ÐRitectul'C and/or by othcr actual experience and practice in the field of land planning. DO. Local Street - A road intended to provide direct access to individual properties and to provide right-of- way for sewer. water. and storm drainage systems. EE. Lot - A", undivided tmet or pareel of laAd A parcel of land within a platted subdivision having frontage on a public street or approved public access easement and 'NhicR is, or in the fUhuÐ fAay be effcmd for salc, corweyanee, transfer or ifApro'/eFAent; whieR is deGignated as a distinct £lAd sepma!Ð tract, and VlRiÐh is intended to be used as a building site or for purposes of buildinç¡ development and which is desiç¡nated as a distinct and separate parcel identified by a tmet or lot number or symbol in a duly approved subdivision plat which has been properly filed and recorded. A lot is not a parcel of unplatted property with an acreaç¡e status. FF. Minor Arterial - A road intended to collect and distribute traffic in a manner similar to principal arterials. exceDt that these roads service minor traffic c;¡enerating areas such as community-commercial areas. primary and secondary educational plants hospitals major recreational areas. churches. and offices. and/or desic;¡ned to carry traffic from collector streets to the system of primary arterials. GG. Model Home - A dwelling unit used initially for display purposes which typifies the type of units to be constructed in the subdivision. HH. Nonresidential Subdivision - A subdivision in which the intended use is either commercial or industrial. II. Off-Site - Any premises not located within the area of the property to be subdivided. whether or not in the same ownership of the applicant for subdivision approval. JJ. Owner - Any person. group of persons firm or firms corporation or corporations. or any other legal entity having leç¡al title to or sufficient proprietary interest in the land sought to be subdivided under these regulations. KK. Perimeter Street - Any street to which the parcel of land to be subdivided abuts on only one (1) side. LL. Person - Any individual, association, firm, corporation, governmental agency, or political subdivision. MM. Planning and Zoning Commission - The appointed body having authority to recommend approval or disapproval of subdivision plats in accordance with these reç¡ulations and state statutes. NN. Planning and Zoning Coordinator - For purposes of these rec;¡ulations. the person designated with the responsibility of accepting subdivision plats for the City and preparinc;¡ the necessary documentation for the Planning and Zoning Commission. 00. Preliminary Plat - (Also rmliFAinal)' De·..clopment Study, Ovemll rlaR of DC'v'clopfAcnt, ete.) TAe gmpRie exprcaaion of thÐ propesed overall plan for 5ubdividiRg, ifAproving aRd ae·..elepiA§ a tract sRewn BY aupÐrifApoaing a Beale dm'....ing of tAe pmposea laAd division on a topogmpRie fAap and sAowin§ in 3lan C)(iBtiAg and propesÐd draina§e featuros and facilities, street layel:Jt aAa aireetioA of emb water flow, and other pertinent features with notations sufficient to Bubstantially identify the geneml seopc and detail of the proposed dcvclepfAcnt The preliminary drawing indicating the Section 13 Definitions Page 13-3 e ~ ~ ~ \) ~ --- ~ , ~ e Subdivision Regulations TT. UU. City of North Richland Hills proposed manner or layout of the subdivision to be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval PP. Principal Arterial - A road intended to move through traffic to and from such maior attractors as central business districts. regional shopping centers. colleges and/or universities. maior industrial areas. and similar traffic generators within the city: and/or as a route for traffic between communities or large areas. QQ. Public Improvement - Any drainage ditch roadway. parkway. sidewalk. pedestrian way or other facility for which the local Qovernment may ultimately assume the responsibility for maintenance and operation. or which may affect an improvement for which local Qovernment responsibility is established. RR. Replat - A PlattiAg action submitted for the purpose of subdivisiAg aA Ðxisting recomes Let er Traet into sFRé1l1m lots sr ts rÐ combiA€! smaller €!xietiAg rÐCOmÐ8 lote or tmcts iAte Q larger tmet A change in a map of an approved or recorded subdivision plat if such chanQe affects any street layout on such map or area reserved thereon for public use. or any lot line' or if it affects any map or plan legally recorded prior to the adoption of any reQulations controlling subdivisions. SS. RiQht-of-Way - A strip of land occupied or intended to be occupied by a street crosswalk railroad road. electric transmission line. oil or gas pipeline water main sanitary or storm sewer main or for another special use. The usage of the term "right-of-way" for land-platting pur:poses shall mean that every right-of-way hereafter established and shown on a final plat is to be separate and distinct from the lots or parcels adjoining such right-of-way and not included within the dimensions or areas of such lots or parcels. RiQhts-of-way intended tor streets. crosswalks. water mains. sanitary sewers. storm drains or any other use involving maintenance by a public agency shall be dedicated to public use by the maker of the plat on which such right-ot-way is established. Right-ot-Way Width - The distance between property lines measured at right angles to the center line ot the street. Subdivider: Any person or any agent thereot, dividing or proposing to divide land so as to constitute a subdivision as that term is defined herein. In any event, the term "subdivider" shall be restricted to include only the owner, equitable owner or authorized agent of such owner or equitable owner, ot land sought to be subdivided. VV. Subdivision: A division of any tract of land situated within the corporate limits of the City, or within the extra-territorial jurisdiction of such limits, into one or more parts for the purpose ot creating lots for sale, tor the purpose of identification, and / or to provide for the dedication ot streets, alleys and easements. Subdivision includes re-subdivision (replat). WW. Subdivision ReQulations - The official ordinance adopted by the City Council to regulate the division ot property within the cor:porate limits of the City ot North Richland Hills in accordance with Chapter 212 of the Texas Local Government Code. XX. Surveyor: A Registered Land Surveyor, as authorized by the applicable State Statutes to practice the surveying. YY. Utility Easement: An interest in land granted to the City, to the public generally, and/or to a private utility corporation, for installing and maintaining utilities across, over or under private land, together with the right to enter thereon with machinery and vehicles necessary for the maintenance of said utilities. Section 13 Definitions Page 13-4 e e e Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills APPENDIX A CITY - DEVELOPER AGREEMENTS Appendix A-I e e \b ~ ~ ~ e . Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills APPENDIX A CITY-DEVELOPER AGREEMENTS The following sample format shall be used as a guided in the preparation of a City· Developer Agreement. The format should be modified where appropriate to specify in detail the responsibilities of the City and the Developer. CITY-DEVELOPER AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That_(lndividuars Name)_, an individual doing business as L(Company Name)_,a Corporation organized under the laws of _(5Iale)_] OR [a Partnership consisting of -,-(Names)_ of the County of , State of ], hereinafter called Developer, and the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called City, enter into the following contract: In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and for the purpose of providing _(Improvemenls)_ as indicated in the construction documents titled _(Pie" Title)_ to serve _(Plet Tille)_, an Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, the Developer and the City hereto agree: 1. The Developer agrees to pay the City all inspection and processing fees and furnish all permits, easements, and right-of-way as required for the construction of the above referenced facilities. In addition, at not cost to the City, the Developer agrees to have complete construction plans, specifications and all other necessary contract documents prepared by a registered Professional Engineer and also furnish construction surveying, cut sheets, and field adjustments. 2. The Developer agrees to post with the City a cash deposit to be placed in escrow or an "Irrevocable Commercial Letter of Credit" in the amount equal to the total construction costs. Such Letter of Credit shall be in compliance with the requirements of the City's Ordinances. The Developer will enter into a contract with the Contractor who will perform the work and who will be paid by the Developer as specified in the construction contract documents. Monthly pay estimates shall be subject to City review. 3. The Developer agrees to provide, at no cost to the City, all testing necessary to insure that the construction is in accordance with the specifications and City standards. 4. The Developer understands and agrees that he has no authority to cancel, alter, or amend the terms of the construction contract without specific written authority of the City, and that he shall be responsible for paying the costs of any cancellations, additions, alterations, or amendments to the Contract unless specifically provided otherwise by written authorization from the City. 5. The Developer agrees to require the selected contractor to provide to the City, on City forms, maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty (20) percent of the contract price. The bond shall be submitted prior to commencing with construction and shall be good for two (2) years commencing with the approved completion of the facilities. Appendix A-2 e (SEAL) "- ~ ATTEST: ~ '" City Secretary STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § e e Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills 6. The City agrees to participate in the cost of the facilities after construction is complete and accepted. The description and amount of participation is as follows: 7. The City will provide the inspections as required, and upon satisfactory completion of the work, the City will accept ownership and operation of the system subject to the terms of the maintenance bonds. 8. The Developer further covenants and agrees to, and by these presents does hereby, fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, and employees from all suits, actions, or claims of any character, whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages sustained by any persons (including death), or to any property, resulting from or in connection with the construction, design, performance, or completion or any work to be performed by said Developer, his contractors, subcontractors, officers, agents, or employees, or in consequence of any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of said Developer, his contractor, subcontractors, officer, agents, or employees, whether or not such injuries, death, or damages are caused, in whole or in part, by the alleged negligence of the City of North Richland Hills, its officers, agents, servants, employees, contractors, or subcontractors. 9. Upon completion of the work, good and sufficient title to all facilities constructed warranted free of any liens or encumbrances is hereby vested in the City of North Richland Hills. 10. Special provisions: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to these presents have executed this Contract in five (5) counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original on this the _ day of , 19_. Developer By City By BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledges to me that he executed the same for purposes and considerations therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this _ day of ,19_. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My Commission Expires ,19_ Appendix A-3 e e e þ Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills APPENDIX B TARRANT COUNTY PLAT FILING REQUIREMENTS Appendix A-4 - e ~ I ~ e .. Subdivision Regulaljons City of Nonh Richland Hills APPENDIX B Requirements to File a Plat with the Tarrant County Clerk Effective Date: November 1, 1991 Court Order No. 61000 Dated: November 28,1988 To provide an accurate historical record of the plats, the following guidelines have been established. Subdivision Plats must be filed in the following format: Plats submitted for filing must be of clear and legible "Black" Line Mylar®; Plat sizes must be 18" by 24", or 24" by 36"; The Plat scale may vary, but must be deemed appropriate by the Professional Surveyor to insure clarity and legibility after said plat has been reduced for filing purposes. The Plat scale must not be smaller than 1" = 200'. Any Plat submitted for filing shall have the dedication, legal description, and appropriate notary statements attached on letter or legal size sheets. The County Clerk shall attach said sheets as a separate but consecutive page to the Plat being filed. Before a Plat is accepted for filing by the County Clerk, it shall have clear and proper signatures, seals, city approvals, etc., and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Plat size of 18" by 24" shall have a filing fee of $35.00, plus $3.00 for Records Management Fee, plus $2.00 per page(s) used for the dedication, legal description, and notary blocks. Plat size of 24" by 36" shall have a filing fee of $50.00, plus $3.00 for Records Management Fee, plus $2.00 per page(s) used for the dedication, legal description, and notary blocks. Any deviation from the above rules will result in twice the regular filing fee being charged for each page that does not meet the requirements as set out. (Local Government Code, Section 191.007) Any Plat submitted for filing shall have the following labeled on the Plat and located above the Surveyor's Title Block, preferably located near the lower right corner of the Plat: THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET ,SLIDE . DATED Any information the County Clerk requires to be affixed to the said Plat during the photography and reduction process should be added by use of transparent "stick-on" labels. If a Registered Professional Land Surveyor is acting as the owner or proprietors' agent of the tract, then he must acknowledge the Plat in the manner required for the acknowledgement of deeds. If not the owner or agent, the Registered Professional Land Surveyor's seal and signature need not be acknowledged. Address and telephone number must be included on the Plat. The County Clerk shall use professional judgment and discretion from the time a Plat is submitted for filing through the process of photography and reductions to insure legibility and clarity of Plats reproduced at a later time from the aperture cards. One aperture card and one 18" by 24" copy or print with the filed volume and page shown on it shall Appendix A-5 fit e ~ ~ \f\ e . Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills be returned to the surveyor preparing the same. Copies of the dedication page(s) shall be included at no additional charge with the purchase of copies of a recorded Plat. To assure the above mentioned guidelines are met, the County has established the following guidelines: · All Plats to be approved by the Commissioner's Court must first be reviewed by a County Clerk employee in the Recording section. The employee will affix their initial in the area provided for the cabinet and slide number. · The Plat must have the filing fee attached. It shall be the duty of the County Clerk to notify all appropriate municipalities in regard to these requirements and insure adherence to such. Appendix A-6 . . e " .. Subdivision Regulations City of North Richland Hills APPENDIX C SECTIONS 212.014, 212.015, AND 212.016 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE Appendix A-7 · e II " § 212.014. Replatting Without Vacating Preced- ing Plat A replat of a subdivision or pal"t of a subdivision may be recorded and is controlling oYer the preceding plat \\;thout vacation of that plat if the replat: (1) is signed and acknowledged by only the own- ers of the property being replatted; (2) is approved, after a public hearing on the matter at which parties in interest and citizens have an opportunity to be heard, by the municipal au- thority responsible for approving plats; and (3) does not attempt to amend 01' remove any covenants or restl;ctions. Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 14~ , ~ 1. efr. Sept. I, 1~¡~7. (e) Compliance \\;th Subsections (c) and (d) is not required for appråval of a replat of part of a preceding plat if the area to be replatted was designated or reserved 1'01' other than single or duplex family resi- dential use hy notation on the last legally recorded plat 01' in the legall~' 'ecorded I'estlictions applicable to the plat. Act." 1987. 70th Leg.. ch. 149. § 1. err. Sept. 1, 1987. Amend- ed by Act.." 1989. 71st Leg.. ch. 345, §§ 2 to 5. err. Aug. 28. 1989; Acts 1993. 73rd Leg.. ch. 1046. § 3. err. Aug. 30, 1993. § 212.016. Amendin~ Plat (a) The municipal authority responsible for approv- ing plats may app 'O\'e and issue an amending plat. which may be recorded and is controlling over the preceding plat \\;thout vacation of that plat. if the amending plat is signed by the applicants only and is solely for one or more of the follo\\;ng purposes: (1) to con-ect an elTor in a course or distance shO\\11 on the preceding plat: (2) to add a course 01' distance that was omitted on the preceding plat; (3) to COITect an en-or in a real propel"ty desclip- tion shO\\11 on the preceding plat; (4) to indicate monuments set after the death, disability, or retirement from practice of the engi- neer 01' stll"Veyor responsible for setting monu- ments: (fiJ to sho\\' the location 01' character of a monu- ment that has been changed in location or character or that is shown incon-ectly as to location or charac- ter on the preceding plat; (6) to correct any othel' type of scrivener or clerical error or omission pre\;ously approved by the municipal authority responsible for approving plats, including lot numbers. acreage. street names, and identification of adjacent recorded plats: (Ï) to con-ect an error in courses and distances of lot lines between two adjacent lot." if: (A) both lot O\\11ers join in the application for amending the plat; (B) neither lot is abolished; (C) the amendment does not attempt to re- move recorded covenants 01' restlictions; and CD) the amendment does not have a material adverse effect on the ·propert~· rights of the other O\\11erS in the plat; (8) to relocate a lot line to eliminate an inadver- tent encroachment of a building or other improve- ment on a lot line or easement: (9) to relocate one or more lot lines between one 01' more adjacent lots if: (A) the O\\11erR of al1 thMe lots join in the application for amending the plat: Œ) the amendment does not attempt to re- move recorded covenants 01' reRtrictions: and (C) the amendment does not inCI'eaRe the num- ber of lots: 01' § 212.015. Additional Requirements for Certain Replats (a) In addition to compliance with Section 212.014, a replat without vacation of the preceding plat must conform to the requirements of this section if: (1) during the preceding five years. any of the area to be replatted was limited by an interim 01' permanent zoning classification to residential use for not more than two residential units per lot; or (2) any lot in the preceding plat was limited by deed restrictions to residential use for not more than two residential units pel' lot. (b) Notice of the hearing required under Section 212.014 shall be given before the 15th day before the date of the hearing by: (1) publication in an official newspaper or a news- paper of general circulation in the county in which the municipality is located; and (2) by \\'itten notice. \\;th a cop~' of Subsection (c) attached. forwarded by the municipal autholity responsible for approving plats to the O\\11ers of lots that are in the original subdivision and that are within 200 feet of the lots to be replatted, as indicat- ed on the most recently approved municipal ta.x 1'011 or in the case of a subdivision \\;thin the e:-:traterri- torial jurisdiction. the most recently approved coun- ty tax roll of the property upon which the replat is requested. The mitten notice may be delivered by depositing the notice. properly addressed with post- age prepaid, in a post office or postal depository \\ithin the boundaries of the municipality. (c) If the proposed replat requires a variance and is protested in accordance \\;th this subsection, the pro- posed replat must receive. in order to be approved. the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths of the members present of the municipal planning commis- sion or governing body, or both. For a legal protest. \\1itten instruments signed by the O\\11erS of at least 20 percent of the area of the lots or land immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed replat and extending 200 feet from that area, but \\ithin the original subdivision, must be filed \\;th the municipal planning commission 01' governing bod~', 01' both. prior to the close of the public hearing. (el) In computing- the percentage of land area under Subsection (cJ. the area of streets and al1eys shall be included. " fIÎ . .. (0) to make necessar~' changes to the preceding plat to create six or fewel' lots in the ¡;ubdivision or a part of the subdh;sion covered by the preceding plat if: (A) the change¡; do not affect applicable zoning and other re¡rulations of the municipality; (B) the changes do not attempt to amend 01' remove any covenant¡; or re¡;tl;ctions; and (C) the area covered by the change¡; i¡; located in an area that the municipal planning commis- sion or other appropriate governing body of the municipality has approved, after a public hearing, as a residential improvement area. (b) Notice. a hearing, and the approval of other lot O\\11ers are not required for the approval and issuance of an amending plat. Acts 1987. 70th Leg.. ch. 149, § 1, err. Sept. 1. 191;7. Amend- ed by Acts 1989, 71~t Leg.. ch. 1. § 41)(b), err. Aug. 28. 1989. e e . INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL N IR 94-52 O. \ ., ~~ ",:::\ 1"'\ Date: April 6, 1994 Subject: Sale of Water System to the City of Watauga The attached letters are to bring you up to date with correspondence related to the offer by the City of Watauga to buy their portion of our water system. Rodger Line received the letter from the Attorney for Watauga. This letter and his answer are attached. A letter from Rex McEntire to Watauga's attorneys is also attached. We have been in contact with our engineers as well as other consulting engineers. We are considering additional studies from these consultants. Please call if you have any questions. Respectfully submitted, bl Þ-f'~L C.A. Sanford Deputy City Manager CAS:ph Attachments _ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAG ER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS e N®RTH .- RJCH LAND HILLS Office of the City Manager March 29, 1993 Mr. Mark G. Daniel Evans, Gandy, Daniel & Moore 115 West Second Street Suite 202 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Dear Mr. Daniel: e The City of North Richland Hills stands ready to produce the available items listed in your letter of March 24, 1994. The charge we asked in connection with item (5), the operating budget, is based upon the actual cost of that document to this City at the time of purchase. They cost $45.00 per copy. However, since you wish to set a price of 85 cents for the first page and 15 cents per page thereafter, the cost to you will roughly be $60.00 per copy. We will compute the exact number of pages for you, but you can make your deposit based upon $60.00 per copy. Item (6) is a book which we are willing to sell for our cost of $15.00. It would probably cost more under your formula. Item (7) was quoted at a cost $1,000.00 as a courtesy to you. There are no such listings and we were willing to create the documents for you. Since we have no such requested record, we respectfully decline to produce a non-existent document. The Open Records Act does not require us to create records. This City received a letter addressed to its elected officials which is dated March 21, 1994. This letter advised in the last paragraph, that any questions concerning the sale and purchase of the water and sewer systems should be directed to the City Manager e 7301 N E LQOD 820 POBox 820609 North Rlchland Hills. Texas 76182-0609 USA -::17~ C::;J1~C::!:",1 ~A)( r;l17\ !:;Q1.!:;t::u::: e e e Page Two at Watauga City Hall. I attempted to reach the City Manager at the Watauga City Hall by telephone on Tuesday, March 22, 1994. I have had no response from that call. Since we have received your letter of March 24th, the Mayor and I have directed our attorney to respond to future correspondence. Please refer future correspondence to Rex McEntire. Very truly yours, ~ ,t/ I // !/;J -/' I \' ¡If ..,7< / ¿)-'-<L \ Rodger N. Line City Manager RNL/gp e e e LAW OFFICES EVANS, GANDY, DANIEL & MOORE MARK G. DA..~IEL (NOT A PARnlERSHIP) SUNDANCE SQL\RE 115 WEST SECO~'D STREET. SL'ITE 202 OF COUNSBL: BOARD CERTIFIBD- CRI~NAL LAW TEXAS BOAR D OF LBGAL SPEClALIZA TlON FORTWORTI!. TEXAS 76102 TI~ EV~'S CRIMINAL TRIALSPBClALIST_ BOARDCERTIFIBD (X 17) 332·3822 DONALD S. GANDY NATIONAL SOARD OFTRIALADVOCACY METRO 429-4194 TIM MOORB March 24, 1994 1\1r. Roger Line City Manager City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECE:3>T REQUESTED Re: Texas Open Records Act Request Dear Mr. Line: Please be advised that I represent the City ofWatauga, Texas. I am writing to request the information included on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference for all purposes pursuant to the Texas Open Records Act, Chapter 552 of the Texas Government Code. It is my opinion that the above and foregoing are public records and are subject to the Texas Open Records Act. If you object to the disclosure of the aforementioned materials, please contact me immediately. Otherwise I would appreciate your having the above referenced documentation copied and forwarded to me at the above address. I will promptly reimburse reasonable costs associated with photocopying of the requested information. Please include a statement of charges in forwarding the requested information. As you may recall, Mr. Bill Keating, the City Manager for the City ofWatauga, Texas, requested this same information during September of 1993. You responded at that time that the cost associated with items 5, 6 and 7 are as follows: e March 24, 1994 Page 2 1) Item No.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $450.00 2) Item No.6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $15.00 3) Item No.7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $1,000.00 TOTAL $1,465.00 Although your cost estimate did not breakdown the costs relating to materials, labor, overhead or price per page, I remain somewhat suspect of the $1,465.00 figure. e The statute that sets the guidelines for cost of materials requested under the Open Records Act is found in Government Code Section 552.261. This statute provides that a governmental body may not charge excessive amounts for public records and that the General Services Commission shall set guidelines for recovering costs and expenses associated with requests for materials made pursuant to the Open Records Act. To that end, the General Services Commission has promulgated guidelines found in 1 Texas Administrative Code, Sections 111.61-111.63 (see attached). The guidelines established by the General Services Commission for Open Records Act materials are as follows: 1) Fifty pages or less of readily available material... .10 cents per page; 2) Fifty or more pages of readily available material... .85 cents for the first page and .15 cents for each additional page; 3) Any quantity of information not deemed readily available ... .70 cents for the first page and .15 cents for additional page plus actual labor costs incurred in providing the requested information; and 4) The city should not charge labor costs for simply making records available for public inspection under the Open Records Act. - e March 24, 1994 Page 3 Additionally, Section 552.262 of the Government Code provides that charges for access to public records that are in computer record banks or other similar record systems shall be set in an effort to match the charge with the actual costs of providing the record after consultation with the General Services Commission and in an amount that reasonably includes all costs related to providing the record. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance with the above request. X:;t'\ ~ MARK G. DANIEL e MGD/sb Enclosure e e e e EXHIBIT "A" (1) Certified copy of December 1991,1992 and 1993 Water and Sewer Inventory prepared by Knowlton- English- Flowers (hereinafter KEF). This should include the base report and letter submitted by KEF to City of North Richland Hills (hereinafter NRH) and the detail used to compute original cost, replacement cost and depreciation, for both the City of NRH and City of \Vatauga. If KEF calculates this report with a computer spread sheet, then the digital files should be included which correspond to each annual report. (2) Detail of the contributed capital which NRH has received for that portion ofthe water and sewer system located in the City ofWatauga since 1971. This should include federal and state grants, developer contributions, impact or connection fees, transfer of assets from other agencies, and other contributions. (3) Copy of most current water and sewer system maps for the service area which includes the City ofWatauga. Reproducible maps at a convenient scale should be included. Also, a digital copy of the GIS data base used to generate these maps. Info data files should include the type of improvement, date placed in service, condition, and original cost. The GIS data base should be delivered in Arc-info export format on PIC-DOS diskette, if possible. (4) List of all real property assets owned by the City of North Richland Hills but located in the City ofWatauga and utilized in operation and maintenance of the North RichIand Hills water and sewer systems. (5) Copy of annual North Richland Hills operating budgets for fiscal years 1983- 1984, and 1993-1994. (6) Copy of 1987 Water and Sewer System Analysis Study performed and prepared by KEF Engineers. (7) Listing of all capital improvements funded from the Utility System operating fund since fISCal year 1983-1984 and any associated bond or debt issues which pertain to the utility system, together with the bond covenants. e COST OP caPJES OF OPEN HECORDS 'lAC ~!¡ II.ûl-I¡¡·(¡J II Uij Ccnc ',,¡ ('lImHlnt to Te.\l\s Civil SwtlllcS, Article 0252-1'11\, §Y(n) amI (b) Ù1C Cunullissiun 11111~t J~ 'loJ cl\l y determine !lIe /lclual COM uf slnmJaru sue (up to 8 \'1 inches tJ)' 14 lndlcs) 'cprOOl1c¡Jons ¡¡JlJ pubIJsh mesc CŒI líglll cs fur use b)' ¡:o\,crnrm:n(¡ù 1)I)¡[lcs !n dClC/IIÜnillS chllt¡::c~ for buppJ)'in¡¡: copies (If pubJ1c infunnDlÍun. The (;umm!5s!on wUl cunsult wiùl custudians of puolic ¡econls concerning. nonstnndard aized pnses or records In computer banks,· on mlcrot11m. ('/' ('lhcr ~imiJllr rccoro kccl'in¡.; S)'~leIllS, in ~ctli\1g 1110sc charges, allernplin¡; to mllt.;;h lhc eh:tl'f;cs wIlh U)~ (¡CIUa.] (:(¡st of !) ·o\·Jdinß lhe rccorus, e 111,62 StllJlunnl Sized PDßes W The chnr&cs I'c!lcclcd in Ihis ~ubsccl¡on ure guhJellJlcs 10 be appliNI as ùle inùivi<.!ua! situnlion lJjclntes. The dClel'IlIJollli(,n (If whelher Infol'!l1ntlon Is or Is nOI rcadlly tlvniJnble is Icft to each governmentnl cntlty. The chnrse for ufÎlcc mnchil1c copics u( pn~cs lip 10 ami IllclmHlIg Irßnl sue (81,~ Inches by 14 incllc~) {Ire ft~ (o ow~: e (I) for.sO poges of ICbS of rcadll)' IIvnllllulc Jllfonn8tlou the guldcllne chDrge ~hn be $ . 10 per lßge; or (2) tor more uHm :;0 pnges of rcmJII)' avllllllblc Informßtlon, UIC guIdeline chnrge 5hnll be $ ,8.5 fot ule fUM pngc IUld $ .IS for coeh lIðlJII ()J¡nl >nge, (3) Por IIny quantilr (If In(onnntlon dcrmcù 10 be nOI rca¡Jlly ClVlliJlIl>l", 1110 lIl,illa! chnrgc 6111111 l>c tJlO combined comþOncntA uf S ,70 for UIC fi¡sl pallc Dud 3> .1.5 (or ench rÞ~e thercnlìet plus ¡1Çtun! lnuor cosls Incuneò by the ogcnc)' In provl\llng the I'cquC5ted In(o 'mntion. '1ÏIC ne.enc>'·~ 41clll41l Inblll' (:I)\I~ 1'1' !lovidiug information Inti)' indllll\, l'tI~ls or Joc/llin¡: Ilntl prepllrlng thc Informllllon ¡¡n~1 1110)' ue compulc.d by multip1)'ing the nlllOUtll (If time /)ctunllj' spent In these m:llv lcs tÍJlICS IlIc ~¡¡ll\r)' rille ()f the cmployee pcrf()rmlllt~ these IIcti\'itic6, For economy nml efficlen\.)· purposes, nn nvernlte Glllnry '¡¡Ie eOll1po~cd (,f nil ÙIC ndiviounl~ within I1n orcuJli.J'lItion who perlonn UIC\(! tasks may be computed CO be u$cd ns 11 5U\ndllrd rille 10 o~ Applied in All r.A~C~. (I» An Ag,ene)' $hould nol ehArt':c for personnel time In milking rccorùs n"nünblc (or public illBl'ccliun untlcr Texns Civil SllItU(CS, Article (j2~2·J 71\, Ce) lJ, estnblislúng chnrgcs, D cncics IIIh)' add nn)' pCl~tnl elal~d ~Xr~M~~. which mny be neeessDry In transmit ÙII: rcpnxluCI!¡J lIocUl\1cnt~, to 11m request In!; pliny 10 ¡he char¡.!e~ cstnblishc.<.! !lIl6l1nlll 10 111i~ sulJ5ecllon, 111.63 Nonstandard Sized I'n tcs of Records in Computer 8nl1l'.S, on MlcrClfilm, or IJI Olher Slnulnr Rt'cold Keeping S)'~tems, 11 is not Ihe rcslP\.'I\.~ibilit)' o( the Commission to prt'delermlne chllrges lor provllllnR records under 'r ellns Civil Statllle~, Anlcle 62':Z·17n, 09(b), but, Instead. to serve M a consululJlI with tJlC ~ovcnullel1lal body'R custodlaJl of the I'r~ordç 10 lIel UtI' ch/lfge, 'nle CUStodIan oftJle rcc(\ ds should. In such instnlK"CB, Inltintc Ihl' COIL'õ\IhntJ¡", IIII<J ~t1I'"I)' (hc C('IIUllinJolI wlùt adequatc cOllI dAta rclnth'c 10 Ihe 10001\tt~t 1(1 ~U l )o,) 1 (hc proposed chargc. 'hlA <:OIlBIIII(ltloll ((~'1I1eAI ~hould ~ 1II1 \Ir~ in "'Jilin/; IIIIV t~ ~l1l1Jr1jt1cx1 \ I 10 I.he nnemloll of the Mnterlel Mnnn¡:emcllt SecllolI of the CelHrolll.rd 5~rYlces 1) \'lslol\ of Sln\(~ I'IIICho\Îllp, nml (¡,lncrn! ServJce~ I C(1mm ~s on. Adcquate C05t dllUl tOf thl~ COII~tlltJ\tlon cQns'~t~ of th~ ~peclflc COM ç()lUplJnCnl~ of the ¡IH ~' ÙUßI char p,c i..I1cluùing out lIot limited 10 ¡Rbor IW\l1 ~ nuLl tnles. compUter lime mul tates, C?5\5 tor IIIDtr.1 tills such n~ CUIII 'lItCj' IItpC$, 'piÍpl'r I IIche. CI\SSel!c~, null prlutct supplies, nutl I IIpplled lIVCI ht"otl by <':0/111'\1/";111 /llItI flppJkmloJl uase. e N®RTH RICH LAND H ILL S April 1, 1994 Honorable Mark G. Daniel Attorney at Law 115 West Second Street, Suite 202 Fort Worth, TX 76102 Dear Mr. Daniel: The Mayor of North Richland Hills is in receipt of a letter of March 21, 1994 addressed to the elected officials of this City which appears to be an offer to purchase that portion of the North Richland Hills Water and Sewer System which is referred to as the Watauga portion. I have been directed to write this letter as an initial response to the offer. Your Council must be aware of the fact that this very matter has been considered by the two City Councils before. Many engineering studies have "'een conducted over the years including studies in connection with ~atauga/s offer of over six million dollars in 1985. The approach taken in the Halff report is a distinct departure from the methodology historically used by the two cities in the past. It appears that Halff Associates, Inc. has been requesting information from us and from Knowlton-English-Flowers for many months in order to complete its report to your City Council. I do not believe that the City is in a position to thoroughly analyze the report and make a reply to your city by April 22, 1994. However, the City will attempt to get you a definitive response within a very short period of time. The most recent engineering studies of value which have been completed by North Richland Hills indicate a current value of the portion of the system referred to in the letter of March 21st in excess of twenty-nine million dollars. However, we will look at your report and will have our engineers update their study. Please be advised that we do not plan to unduly delay a response to your Council's offer. Very truly yours, e ï301 N.E. Loop 820 P.O. Box 320609 Rex McEntire Attorney for the City .ulih Richiand H¡i s. Texas 76182-0609 uSA ,~;': 581-5500 F,~X (8í7) 581-5516 e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - MARCH 28, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order March 28, 1994 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Mayor Lyle E. Welch Mayor Pro Tem Jo Ann Johnson Councilwoman Ray Oujesky Councilman Byron Sibbet Councilman Linda Spurlock Councilwoman Staff: Rodger N. Line City Manager Randy Shiflet Assistant City Manager Jeanette Rewis City Secretary e Rex McEntire Attorney Absent: Mack Garvin Councilman Mark Wood Councilman C.A. Sanford Deputy City Manager 2. INVOCATION Councilwoman Johnson gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 1994 APPROVED e Mayor Pro Tem Welch moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve the minutes of the February 28, 1994 meeting. March 28,1994 Page 2 e Motion carried 4-0, Councilwoman Spurlock abstaining due to absence. 5. PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS No action necessary. 6. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Welch removed Item No. 18 and Councilman Sibbet removed Item No. 20 from the Consent Agenda. e 7. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (13, 14, 15, 17, 19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,&33) APPROVED Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 5-0. 8. PZ 94-03 - PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF FERN CAGLE FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A PERSONAL CARE HOME ON LOTS 1A AND 1B, BLOCK 1, GLENVIEW PARK ADDITION ORDINANCE NO. 1973 APPROVED Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request. No one appeared. Mayor Brown called for anyone to speak in opposition. e No one appeared. e e e March 28,1994 Page 3 Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve Ordinance No. 1973. Motion carried 5-0. 9. PZ 94-04 - PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF SHARON CALLlON FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A PERSONAL CARE HOME ON LOT 11, BLOCK 3, LONDONDERRY ADDITION ORDINANCE NO. 1974 APPROVED Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request. No one appeared. Mayor Brown called for anyone to speak in opposition. No one appeared. Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky , to approve Ordinance No. 1974. Motion carried 5-0. 10. PZ 94-05 - PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - REQUEST OF THE RICHLAND HILLS CHURCH OF CHRIST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A TIRE & BATTERY SALES STORE ON A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 25, SNOW HEIGHTS ADDITION ORDINANCE NO. 1975 POSTPONED This item was postponed until the April 25, 1994 City Council Meeting. March 28,1994 Page 4 e 11. PZ 94-06 - PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF SANDRA CHAPMAN TO REZONE LOT 16A, BLOCK 5 AND LOT 7A1A, BLOCK 4, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ADDITION ORDINANCE NO. 1976 APPROVED Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request. Mr. Coy Quine, representing the applicant, appeared before the Council. Mr. Quine stated that they wanted to remodel the shopping center. There were several questions from the Council pertaining to landscaping and the sprinkler system. Mayor Brown called for anyone to speak in opposition. e No one appeared. Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. After considerable discussion on the landscaping and sprinkler system requirements, Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Welch, to approve Ordinance No. 1976 with the stipulation of 5,000 square feet landscaping and staff work out the sprinkler system. Motion carried 5-0. 12. PS 94-06 - REQUEST OF QUADRANGLE DEVELOPMENT FOR FINAL PLAT OF CENTURY OAKS ADDITION, THIRD FILING APPROVED Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Welch, to approve PS 94-06. Motion carried 5-0. e e e e March 28,1994 Page 5 *13. GN 94-27 - TRANSITIONAL HOUSING FOR THE INDIGENT ORDINANCE NO. 1977 APPROVED *14. GN 94-28 - RESTRUCTURING OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT APPROVED *15. GN 94-29 - ROAD HUMP POLICY ORDINANCE NO.1921 APPROVED 16. GN 94-30 - PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITY DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPROVED Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Welch, to approve GN 94-30 with the stipulation that the weight room be the first priority. Motion carried 5-0. *17. GN 94-31 - ADVENTURE WORLD CHANGE ORDER NO.1 APPROVED 18. GN 94-32 - APPROVE "NO PARKING" ZONES ON TECNOL BOULEVARD AND INDUSTRIAL PARK BOULEVARD ORDINANCE NO. 1978 APPROVED e e e March 28, 1994 Page 6 Mayor Pro Tem Welch moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No. 1978 with the stipulation the no parking be permitted on the north side of TECNOL or on either side where the street curves. Motion carried 5-0. *19. GN 94-33 - APPROVAL OF PART-TIME CLERK POSITION - MUNICIPAL COURT APPROVED 20. GN 94-34 - ADVENTURE WORLD EXPO DIRECT COST FUNDING APPROVED Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Welch, to approve GN 94-34 and that funds be provided from the Parks and Recreation Account. Motion carried 3-2, Mayor Pro Tem Welch, Councilman Sibbet and Councilwoman Johnson voting in favor of the request. Councilman Oujesky and Councilwoman Spurlock voting in opposition. *21. PU 94-19 - STRUMMER DRIVE WIDENING PROJECT - RATIFY PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY, PARCEL NO. 19 APPROVED *22. PU 94-20 - WALKER'S BRANCH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY - PARCEL NO. 34 APPROVED *23. PU 94-21 - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT ADVENTURE WORLD RESTROOM DESIGN APPROVED March 28, 1994 Page 7 e *24. PU 94-22 - AWARD BID FOR SIREN CONTROLS FOR POLICE CARS APPROVED *25. PU 94-23 - AWARD OF BID FOR BANK DEPOSITORY CONTRACT RESOLUTION NO. 94-12 APPROVED *26. PU 94-24 - AWARD BID FOR REMOVAL OF HOUSES ON JERRI JO APPROVED e *27. PU 94-25 - AWARD BID FOR COMMUNITY CENTER LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *28. PU 94-26 - AWARD BID FOR DUMP TRUCK APPROVED *29. PU 94-27 - AUTHORIZATION TO EXTEND AUTOMOTIVE PARTS CONTRACT WITH DICK SMITH, INC. APPROVED *30. PU 94-28 - AWARD BID FOR RESCUE TOOL FOR NEW FIRE TRUCK APPROVED e *31. PU 94-29 - AWARD BID FOR DIGITAL IMAGING SYSTEM APPROVED March 28, 1994 Page 8 e *32. PU 94-30 - STRUMMER WIDENING PROJECT - RATIFY PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY PARCELS 4A & 4B, LOT 8 AND LOT 9, RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION, 1 ST FILING APPROVED *33. PW 94-08 - PROPERTY OWNER AGREEMENTS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF BROWNING DRIVE APPROVED 34. CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mr. Art Maldonado, 7405 Lola Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Malddonado e asked that speed humps be installed on Lola and that the cost be waived. Mayor Brown advised Mr. Maldonado to meet with the City Manager on the requirements pertaining to speed humps. Mr. Dane Hulsey, 3921 Sarra Lane, Springtown, appeared before the Council. Mr. Hulsey advised he had a shop on RufeSnow and asked that the ordinance be changed to allow a portable sign to be up longer than 30 days. Mr. Hulsey advised he had also placed banners on his car and was told by the City that he would have to take them off. Mr. Hulsey was advised to contact Mr. Barry LeBaron. The following appeared requesting that Continental Trail not be opened at the North Richland Hills/Keller boundary. Mr. Carl Orton, 7317 Continental Trail Mr. Michael Rossetti, 8040 Valley Drive Mr. Richard Hudler, 7313 Continental Trail Ms. Mary Pfirman, 7325 Continental Trail e Mayor Brown advised that the City Staff would study it and get back with a report as soon as possible. e e e Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting. ATTEST: March 28,1994 Page 9 35. ADJOURNMENT Tommy Brown - Mayor Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary . . . MINUTES OF THE BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE PRE-COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 February 15, 1994 ATTENDANCE Present: Deloris Pultz Alice Scoma Billie Sommermeyer Emily Ward Patsy Tucker Jane Dunkelberg STAFF Tim Hightshoe Christina Lopez Chairperson Commission Member Commission Member Commission Member Commission Member Vice Chairperson Absent: Parks/Public Grounds Superintendent Secretary 1. CALL TO ORDER Ms. Pultz called the meeting to order February 15,1994 at 7:05 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Mrs. Sommermeyer moved, seconded by Ms. Ward, to approve the minutes of the January 18, 1994 Beautification Commission meeting. Motion carried 4-0. 3. VOLUNTEER BANQUET DONATIONS - FOOD The Volunteer Appreciation Banquet will be held on Thursday, March 3, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. Ms. Tucker will be organize decorations. The Commission would like to seek donations for food items for the Banquet. Ms. Scoma moved, seconded by Ms. Tucker to seek donations from Cici's Pizza, Olive Garden, Food Lion and Sam's Club. Motion carried 4-0. 4. CAMERA The Commissions' current camera is broken, the plastic gears are worn out. The estimated cost to repair is $85.00. Mrs. Sommermeyer moved, seconded by Ms. Tucker, to repair the camera instead of purchasing a new camera. Motion carried 4-0. 5. YARD OF THE MONTH CERTIFICATES The Commission would like to reorder a two year supply of Yard Of The Month Certificates. They would also like to see other samples to change it up. Samples will be provided at the March meeting. Beautification Commission Minutes February 15, 1994 1 - e;ity of ~orth -rochland Hills . WHEREAS, TholLðandt, 06 de.di.c.a.te.d pubUc. ¿,a6uy .te1.e.c.ommu.n.ic.a.tio n6 peM 0 nnne1. dail.y ¿, VLV e. .the. c-i..t<.z e.n6 06 .the. Unile.d S.ta.tu by an6weJÚng .thÚIL .te1.e.phone. c.a.U.ó 6M poUc.e., 6.úte. and emVLge.nc.y me.di.c.a1. ¿,VLV'¿C.U and d.U.pa.tdu.ng .the. appltopJUa.te. a¿,Úð.t4nC.e. a¿, qUÁ..c.lz1.y a¿, po¿'Úble.; and WHEREAS, The. ~ 6unc;Uon6 pVLn0lUne.d by pltO 6 uÚo na.t pubUc. ¿,a6 e;ty .te1.e.c.onmun.i.c.a.tio n6 peM 0 nne1. a..t.ð 0 '¿nc..fude. .tho¿,e. lte1.a..te.d .to 6MIU:tJLy and C.On6VLva.tion opvz.tLti.On6, h.i.ghJAJa.y ¿,a6e;ty and m,,'¡nte.na.nc.e. ac;Uviliu, and man!:! o.thVL opvz.tLti.On6 pVL601Une.d by 6e.de.ll.a.t, ¿,.ta.te., c.ounty and mu.n.iupa1. govVl.J1l7le.nt age.nuu; and WHEREAS, Plt06uÚona.t pubUc. ¿,a6e;ty .te1.e.c.ommun.ic.a.tion6 peMonne1 wMk. to .tmpltove. .the. emVLge.nc.y ltU po n6 e. c.apabili.ûu 06 .thu e. c.ommu.n.ic.a.tio n ¿, y¿,.t~ .thltoug h .thÚIL .te.a.deMh.i.p and paJLÜupa.tion '¿n :tJLlÚn.ing pJt.Og~ altel o.thVL ac;Uviliu pltov.i.de.d by .the. A¿,¿,oc..i.a.t.i.on 06 Pub.t.i.c.-Sa6uy Commun.ic.a.tiOn6 06 MUai-6- I ntVLlla.tiOna.t; and WHEREAS, The. A¿,40c..i.a.t.i.on 06 Pub.t.i.c.-Sa6e;ty Commun.ic.a.tiOn6 o 66-¿úa..t.ð- I ntVLna.tiOna.t Inc.., all olt9aMzation 06 molte. .than 10,000 pe.op.te. e.ngage.d Ú .the. du'¿gn, '¿n6.ta.Ua.tion and opvz.tLti.on 06 emVlgenc.y lte..6pOn6e. c.ommun.ic.a.tiOn6 ¿,y¿,.t~, ha¿, ¿,u a¿,.i.de .the ¿,e.c.ond week. '¿n Apw. to lte.c.ogMze public. ¿,a6e;ty te1e.C.Or.1muMC.a.tiOn6 pvuonne1 and .thÚIL CJw.ua1. ltote. Ú the. pltote.c;Uon ot li6e. and pltO pe.JLty . e NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Tommy Bltown, Mayolt 06 the. C.i.ty 06 No!t1:h R'¿c.h!and HilL6, T exa¿, do hVLe.by pltoc1.tLÙn the we.e.k. 06 Apw. 10-16, 1994, a¿,: "/.JATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATIONS WEEK" Ùl No!t1:h R'¿c.h.tand HilL6, '¿n hOlwlt and 1te.c.ognLtt.on 06 OUA public. M.6 e;ty te1.e.c.ommUlúc.a.tio M pvu 0 nne1 and the v.ua.t c.ontJúbu.uon6 they mak.e. to the .6ct6e;ty and well-bung 06 OUA w""¿zeru. . e IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hVle.u.nto ¿, e;t my hand and c.a.u..6 ed the ¿, e.a£ 06 the C.i.ty 06 Nolt-th R'¿c.h£.ay¡d H-U1..6, to be. a66Úe.d th-L6 the. 11th ay 06 AplLil., 1994. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 4/11/94 Subject: Request of Meadow Lakes North Company for Final Plat of Meadow Lakes North Addition, Phase I. This property is located south of Browning Drive, west ofIron Horse Golf Course. Agenda Number: PS 94-09 Meadow Lakes North Company is the owner and developer of a 15.8 acre tract of land located on the west side ofIron Horse Golf Course, south of Browning Drive. The developer proposes to develop the land for single family residences. The Preliminary Plat of this property was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 28, 1993. This Final Plat is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat. The following are the issues concerning this Final Plat: 1. Browning Drive will be extended from Wuliger Way approximately 2,000 feet to the end of the existing Browning Boulevard in Haltom City. The City will construct the roadway, and the developer will pay for all engineering and surveying necessary. The developer will also sign a voluntary assessment covenant for repayment of 100% of the construction cost for their portion of the street. This includes all of the south side of Browning Drive as well as the north side in Haltom City. 2. Questions regarding the dedication of right-of-way for Browning Drive have been resolved. Some parcels have been dedicated by separate document, and the remaining portions have been dedicated by plat. 3. Portions of this plat involve small tracts of land which are part of Iron Horse Golf Course. The City Council is considering a series of land swaps as a separate agenda item to clean up the boundary between the golf course and the adjacent private development. . All engineer's comments have been addressed. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this Final Plat at their March 24, 1994 meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating BU~·'f"2 R~ .- Other'" . O~tt~~ ~""~. Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director Manager Page 1 of e e e General Information A. Owner B. Developer C. Engineer D. Surveyor E. Acreage F. No. of Lots G. Zoning H. Prop. Use Water and Sewer A. Lines B. Fire Coverage Streets and Thoroughfares A. Thor. Plan B. Improvements C. Extensions D. New Streets E. Street Lights F. Access G. Sidewalks H. Screening Walls I. New Street Names Subdivision Plat Review Fact Sheet Case Number PS 94-09 Meadow Lakes North Company, Ft Worth, TX Same Stembridge & Associates, NRH, TX Rivers & Associates, Mineral Wells, TX 15.800 acres 50 R-2 Single Family Residential Single family dwellings The developer will install and construct the necessary water and sewer facilities to serve this development. All facilities will be constructed to Public Works specifications. The developer will install the necessary fire hydrants to provide the required fire coverage. This property is adjacent to a Collector streets (Browning Drive). Browning Drive will be improved. The developer will pay for all engineering and surveying, and the City will construct the roadway. The developer will be assessed by the City for 100% of the construction costs. None proposed or planned. Three new streets will be constructed in this subdivision. Street lighting will be constructed according to Public Works policies. This property is accessed from Browning Drive. Sidewalks are required on all lots as the lot develops. Sidewalks adjacent to masonry screening walls must be built as the wall is built. The Subdivision Regulations require a masonry screening wall along C4U roadways or larger that abut a residential subdivision. Browing Drive is currently classified as a C4U, but the Council will consider reclassifying Browning Drive to a C2U (PS 94-10). Iron Horse Drive, Eagle Drive, Club House Drive e e e Drainage A. Flood Plain According to Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 48439C0090G, this property lies within the 1 OO-year and SOO-year flood plain. B. Improvements The developer will improve a grass swale to coney storm water runoff across the golf course and into Singing Hills Creek. C. Easements Several drainage easements are provided on the property to ensure adequate drainage. Comprehensive Land Use Plan A. Consistency This request is consistent with the adopted Land Use Plan, which calls for low density single-family development in this area. The Plan also calls forinstitutional development in this area (Iron Horse Golf Course). e N@RTH RICH LAND HILLS March 18, 1994 Public Works MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Mike Curtis, P.E. Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS 94-09; MEADOW LAKES NORTH ADDITION Block 1-4; Final Plat I have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on March 10, 1994 and offer the following comments. e 1. Documentation for right-of-way dedication across 334.5' of the plat's northeast frontage will need to be provided. This will confirm the plat's total north frontage being on publicly dedicated street right-of-way. 2. Design must be provided for a grassed swale to be constructed on the golf course property to convey runoff from the storm drain discharge between Lots 7 & 8 of Block 4 easterly to Singing Hills Creek. 3. The title block needs to be revised as shown. 4. The utility easement between lots will need to be 15 feet. The final plat will need to be revised to show a 15 foot utility easement between Lots 8 and 9, Block 4. 5. A sidewalk and utility easement as defined in the Design Manual will need to be added at the intersection of Iron Horse Drive and Browning Drive. 6. The current zoning needs to be clearly indicated on the face of the plat. This includes the proposed lots and the adjacent lots. e 7301 N.E. Loo~ 820 P.O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 USA (817) 581-5521 FAX (817) 656-7503 e e e 7. The metes and bounds description will need to include the potions of land that was part of the land trade with the City. 8. There are comments regarding the engineering and construction plans recorded on a set of blue lines. The plans have been returned to the engineer for revision. The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer of his responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans. The City's eventual approval of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. Public Works is recommending that this plat be revised prior to submitting to the City Council for approval. The construction plans will need to be approved by Public Works prior to the preconstruction meeting. The marked-up blue lines need to be returned with the next submittal. ~:k r:.,i¡ C/smm/pwm94031 cc: Greg Dickens, P.E., Public Works Director Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning & Inspection Services e STEMBRIDGE AND ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers 6528 Sherri Lane, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 817-581-8208 MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills FROM: Stembridge & Associates Consulting Engineers SUBJECT: PS 94-09 MEADOW LAKES NORTH ADDITION Block 1-4; Final Plat We have received a copy of the StaffEngineer's comments dated March 18, 1994, on the above referenced plat and take no exceptions. e Items that have not already been corrected will be corrected prior to submission to Council. \}. nO.l!) .\r C\.' \J \ De~~e~ e e STEMBRIDGE AND ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers 6528 Sheni Lane, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 817-581-8208 February 2, 1994 MEMO TO: R.Michael Curtis, P.E. Staff Engineer FROM: Delbert R. Stembridge, P.E. SUBJECT: PS 93-35; Meadow Lakes North (Iron Horse Estates) Final Plat and Construction Plans Submitted for your review are twelve (12) copies of the final plat and two sets of construction plans. Also retmned is your review set of the preliminary plat and preliminary engineering plans. We point out the owner desires to change the name of the proposed e subdivision. We appreciate your prompt and thorough review of our earlier submittal. An item by item response of your review letter is as follows: 1. The address and telephone nwnber of the owner has been added to the final plat. 2. The title block has been revised as shown. 3. The point of beginning has been clearly labeled on the final plat. 4. The survey has been tied to the city's G.P.S. 5. The metes and bounds description has been revised to show only the area that will be in phase one development. 6. Sidewalk and utility easements have been added to the plat. 7. The building set back lines for the comer lots has been revised. e 8. The drainage easement between the lots now have an overland concrete surface. 9. Any off site easements required will be prepared and submitted within a few days. e February 2, 1994 Page Two 10. Browning Drive will be constructed under another project as a city project. 11. Browning Drive will be constructed under a separate city contract. 12. Right of way dedications will be shown on the plans for Browning Drive. 13. Sidewalks will be shown on the plans prior to pre-construction conference. 14. Street lights will be added to the plans prior to the pre-construction conference. 15. Any additional drainage improvements are addressed in a hydraulics report prepared by Monison Hydraulic Engineers and has been submitted to the city by them. 16. An engineer's certification has been added to the drainage calculation sheet. e 17. A request for a "construction stonn water pennit" will be submitted within the next few days. 18. The developer has plans for the screening wall Copies will be submitted to the city. 19. Review appreciated_ 20. When Phase 2 is developed the drainage area between Phase 1 and Phase 2 will be designated as a lot in Phase 2 and dedicated to the city. 21. Marked up blue lines returned. Additional comments addressed to the review of the Preliminary Drainage Sheet. a. ) We will request that the drainage channel between Phases 1 and 2 be an earthen channel. The easement will become a lot in Phase 2 and dedicated to the city. The limits of the 100 year flood plain will remain within the boundary established. b.) The bridge plans for the tributary will be submitted with the plans for Phase 2. e c.) A banicade for the end of Iron Horse Drive is contained in the street plans for the proposed subdivision. - e e February 2, 1994 Page Three d.) Flow arrows will be added to the plans prior to the pre-construction conference. e.) The limits of the 100 year flood plain are shown on the drainage sheet. f.) A flume has been added over the easement in Phase 1. g.) Plans for the bridge and Browning Drive will be done under a separate contract as a city project. Dedications for rights-of-way wiJI be submitted prior to construction. The proposed water line ftom WuIiger Way will be constructed within the R.O.W. of Browning Drive. h.) 1ñe discharge of the stonn drain pipe wiJlbe onto golf course property and sheet flow across No. 13 fairway. i) All lots will be filled to remove them from the 100 year flood plain. j.) Due to the difference in elevation of the lots that back up to the golf course, we still prefer to have the sewer line in the rear to allow for split level houses. The sewer line wiJllie on city property so no easements have been requested. k.) All other changes have been made to confonn with YoW" comments. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please do not hesitate to call. , '. /,/'1' \. 'W'1 ,,' " ,. , £il ,I. \" ~ '_ <-' .'..{"v[ f-. ¡ /J. ''\ ~ r Delb R. Stembn(Jge, P.E. Proposed Subdivision Name Previous Legal Description Owner of Record ~~O\~~ Address 373)- FEIV'"t'c;..v- Phone ;:? í 1.. - 't"') .J City of North Richland Hills Application for Final Plat {v¡ ¿p.piN'J (;h<¡::,e;:, N ~I~ ÁPtnlVÑ . fJ('~"'ìtT Cc: ""''''A.t¡ ~ v€" - Ç[ _ c......c-~ì rt f/\ 7"'/33> Previous Owner ~(~ Address Phone Developer ~~~ON LkCEh N ~µ. <:::::-øMP4 Address 373) +=è....ìc...- ~v£ E,,· ~\,IT IX;- 7~J33 Phone ? 1 2 - 4)- J s . Engineer/Planner Address Phone S-I~~DQ~ ~Af:£öú\$k;.~ ú/5?'Pa ~"'~\ L..¡., Ng\\ 1(O\'tO <S~ w 9;2.db Final Plat Fees Use 'fJ Residential Non-Residential Filing Fee PLUS Street Sign Fee Recording Fee $120.00 $1.50 per lot for Residential or $5.00 per acre for Non-Residential $65.00 per intersection $40.00 for 18" x 24" Plat or $55.00 for 24" x 36" Plat No. of Lots/Acres ~D x $1.50/$5.00 = No. of Street Intersections 6 x $65.00 = Recording Fee p~:' ::ft 0 ~ + $120.00 5ßj...;. TOTAL FEE e - continued on next page - rs 44-01 I ~G\.~ ~o 9'1'.' ~oo' Iv~I'.'" . I I , ~ h ' ii . . ': . I I '-.'('II ~ DH I III "'Dr< i L r T\ 1\lI I " ¡Ill I' , ~\JG" ' E:E:tjhllll~ 1-('\["//1' I I II I-..\JIIIIU ~' ml~~~: '~j~~~"i¡~rl~ ~t. == m Þ~" I f'" fl.l...L..I.. II '~T~~" H'N"'R I I II II! II IlJLlill ø -~ r- I '-:J l.........TH F't I ~~ ... I L L.S C I rV V...., TS ~ ,'---: ", ªª ~~ ~ $ ~ !IIIìïH~D : -0 j / d( c=J ~fµi1i~'>Ä ~~.I ~~-''-'D; ,In ,..\. ~ ~ 11 c:- \\~u. ~~(= ~~.a;C ~~ J1.~:;:;Y ,~o\Js' Þ ~lfO~~'~'_-l~. 'r'~~-"'~ .)"'1iII_~~':;::.'!J'.a..~......,.c ~'I Æ I h [\L 'f't :'í \ ~ -- ,¿ I j V ~~~I ~ ~~, ~~~ r · , · 7' 'Jo.l, /;If i,i ,~.k"U,~~CA~_. · . <.- ~ø V/ :- .,~ ~f: ~ffi1j ~ ,.. Þ.~ -Q. ~ ~ oÌ:~ -- \ mr ~ ~ / rJ¢7 l' - -., E:J \,.0' ~ · r. ~~ , I ./ · 1 ': ~ v X (Ä '~';.v~ ,....t. I' ~= Œ* ¡ 1... - "'\t V / .: ~o,'" '~r$J" > '\ ~ ;oo-.Jì; Æ ~ '\\ \, ;:---: Î _ · _ -~ ~~,~ ~ ~ vf ~~-tto ø þ' I h, \ ~c:= ¡¡ ,,~,/41 /' ?~ I \' ~oo" \ \ Mt:::: ~~ ..,{;.~ (( J t/!..- \\ \/TTTI ü'./'/ LooP ßZD y D ~/ il - (( \.,...t.S ~ ~~1~W ll....Elt[R'1.1 IIiII.I 'tJv<:P" ~ .i I I I III · ~ 7 III I 1.1- ~ I :(tí~1 ~~ ...-,..- - .om I\.J 'I ~ (>%~~t:: ~- '~' , ~ \1>,~W ~, I . ~~. (. ~~-_~Y' A"~=_ 1 ~, v-""') ------ ~. _---~ C ~ - ~ ...<Y E= ~ oo;~ c _ '--. _J J I ¡ \ \ \ ~ y-;r.. rv ,""-- I , II I ~ r~..w·\ot . ,......... ... - . .C ,,,~~ ~,,.:~ ---=::::: " '" CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 4/ll/94 ubject: Public Hearing to consider revisions to the Master Thoroughfare Plan regarding Browning Drive. Agenda Number: PS 94-10 Ordinance No. 1981 At the February 28, 1994 City Council meeting, a funding plan was approved for the construction of Browning Drive from its current terrninationjust west ofWuliger Way to the most western city limits. The proposed construction will improve this thoroughfare as though it were a C2U Collector. The current designation on the Master Thoroughfare Plan is a C4U Collector. The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider amending the Master Thoroughfare Plan to designate Browning Drive as a C2U Collector from Rufe Snow Drive to the western city limits. The existing pavement from Rufe Snow to Wuliger Way is currently constructed to the C2U standards. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at their March 24, 1994 meeting and recommended approval. Approval of Ordinance No. 1981 will amend the Master Thoroughfare Plan to show the proper designation of Browning Drive. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available r I . -^...,..~ 1_~·~-'\. fA 8 ~'" ~"'. Department· Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACT/ON ITEM . Finance Director ð'-" II\. Manager Page 1 of · · · Ordinance No. 1981 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, TO MAKE REVISIONS REGARDING DOUGLAS LANE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a Public Hearing to consider said revisions, and after hearing, determines that such revisions shall be adopted. NOW, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, the thoroughfare classification of Browning Drive be hereby changed from its current classification as a C4U Major Collector to a C2U Minor Collector from its beginning point at the western city limit line to its easterly termination point at Rufe Snow Drive, as shown in Exhibit A. 2. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 3. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance; and that the Master Thoroughfare Plan shall hereafter reflect these revisions. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 24th DAY OF MARCH, 1994. J/ I // " //.... t ,.// r: j '~;¡';'{l/utA/ ,/~/-,-, Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission ~- ¿~ ~~. ,/ (.~., ng andZ6í:;lng Commission ; _i '-,_o:? · PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 11 th DAY OF APRIL, 1994. Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City · · Ordinance No. 1981 Page 2 X/I\J...LLJi 1III>'~lÀVVJ:::l~=Ul1(Yllì'~~_' V'-~ 'L~ f /:::1r?:"'" I IIIIIII III~ _ ..... C . r/ìJ-,ti""I"~ ::J J E A .o......¿, \' tîllllll/~ :j X~ltòl"" ~~\./I II II ~ 1l \\/þt..r, IIllf~ q I :j~ TTT~~~ 11'1 1=1 ~I ITIJ1JTTl::1 ~ t:: I I I r 1 T 7l:::1 '¡-(---. Eì'L f1 J " rT r \~ Ø/ U ~ - IIIIIIIIJ::j - t:: æ I- ] I /I I I- I II I I " I t II L-J ~ ITIIIIIIJ=1 :: S êË ffiI:REtõ ~ ~:~ - U-L1lll-Q::j c: W/~ tIt B:fl:Btt Œ1IIllllIIIITIJ .I)::: "V ìTTìT , II I I I I I I I i.....J ~ T.... I l' I ,...,,"", , R r r I I I II r J r I I I r J rr I I I I I I I I r I I I r I I \ \. .~ . - ...;.r:r_L I ~.I~ r..¡: .-JL"'t" W' r:Þ ' ...æ'n-i Fe I" _II 4~ HI LL.S C I TV ...., TS I - .-1"'""'( ..... I - .- = ITIIIIIIJJ} 1......R t::: I --r.- "- =~rnmmID~- I - ~ ~ ,= . ¡:: l.- i j t= 1111 I~\~t: : '/-~D l I- -JJ./H~ ...... I // -_inl L---- ,v:.ct""~v}j / k 0~Vrl ...... /T\Y I I I ~~. ._n;-.....~ . . ~ J) m- \\1- 1P~ "'RË1 . [;2~ ~ ~ ~ T ' Ë ~ ¡... ~ ~ .~~ ?" ~ ~ ~ r .....0 A '1II!I!r-¡ ~ - ~, ~ ~ ~ l' :~~ ~¡~ II ~g~Do ,-77 -- ¡ Iii ~~.ç ~~~ ~ ~~ AI'!; ;' .~ï ~w ~ .- ~ ~~ , t-- '\ .~ I I .. j.'r.-~ - ih "....- bB[ I i---- == - i--- » ~ñí - .._a..__... ~ ~ ~8 :¥=I J ~ 1.-~~5: TT I II I I ~ _1"':' hf3 [IT ~:~ ~ -- ::~_T~ Î HSt~? "'II-- ) ~ -\/1\..7__1 11ft] ;, - = ~- "'î"['t:~ I J I - ~ ¡~ - -- r-~ " -i IIIIII ~~ ",,=1-- \ 1// ...... -- ~ I't: - ...{ / M I J 1T\ \~~ / IITTr'\. I¡ ,) i '-- - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Community Services Department Department: _ b' t Approval of Park Construction Coordinator Position o:>U Jec : Council Meeting Date: 4/11/94 GN 94-35 Agenda Number: Included in the approved Park and Recreation Facility Development Capital Improvement Program is funding tor a Park Construction Coordinator. This position will have the responsiblity for planning and coordinating Capital Improvement Program construction projects in the Community Services Department. They will also perform drafting work and preparation of construction documents for in-house projects, as well as initiating, overseeing, and tracking of all projects under development. A detailed job description is attached. Currently, 23 Capital Improvement Program projects are being administered, most of which are in the design docwnent phase. Major new facility projects with construction beginning this spring and summer include the Family Aquatic Park, Richfield restroom and concession building, Richfield irrigation, and the playground renovation work, Green Valley Community Park and Soccer Complex, Joint City/School Tennis Center and sport fields. Continued design and construction projects will necessitate a Park Construction Coordinator to oversee project implementation and administer construction contracts to insure quality designs and new facility construction. The requested mid-year hire cost is anticipated to be $17,985 including benefits, based on an annual base salary of $28,812. This position will be slotted in pay grade 21. Funding is available from the Park Operations and Special Services budget within the Parks and Recreation Faclities Development Capital Improvement Program budget. Funding is available in the 1993/94 Park and Recreation Facilities Operations Budget (09-75-02). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Park Construction Coordinator position and authorize a mid-year hire. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget· Other Acct. Number Su~n t Fun~vailable . -ð,1"... _ .~ '_/ t-·;xtv~'-f ~1 î~~ {ì ~ '\joepartment Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM t::' ~. . Finance Director Page 1 of e . e . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS JOB DESCRIPTION POSITION: PARK CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES STATUS: APPOINTED (EXEMPT) PARKS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS MANAGER REPORTS TO: NATURE OF WORK: Professional work at the administrative level planning and coordinating Capital Improvement Program projects in the Community Services Department. Work involves initiating, overseeing, and tracking of all projects under development. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS: Coordinates and tracks design and construction projects in the Community Services Department. Directs, instructs, and schedules the work of architects, engineers, and other consultants in the planning phase of projects. Directs, instructs, and schedules the work of contractors in the construction phase of projects. Prepares plans and specifications and cost estimates for projects. Prepares and oversees state and federal grant applications. Monitors Capital Improvement Program expenditures. Prepares and presents formal presentations to the Parks and Recreation Board and other boards, commissions, and organizations. Performs design and drafting work for in-house projects. Procures bids for projects and products. - . e . Assists in the preparation of the Capital Improvement Program budget, and the Park Operations and Special Services budget. REQUIREMENTS OF WORK: Extensive knowledge of the principles and practices of park planning, and public parks and recreation design and construction. Extensive knowledge of methods, materials, tools, and practice used in the construction of park facilities. Knowledge of sports, recreation, and aquatics facility concepts and designs. Knowledge of and familiarity with the Texas Parks and Wildlife grant process Knowledge of landscape architecture practices, construction techniques, arboriculture, irrigation, civil engineering; and the knowledge to combine them into an aesthetically coordinated and finished product. Skills in reading and interpreting architectural and engineering plans and specifications. Skills in recognizing quality of products and materials to insure compliance with project plans and specifications. Ability to communicate orally or in writing, utilize drafting techniques and artistic ability. Ability to make measurements using survey instruments. Ability to prepare records and reports as necessary. General PC skills and familiarity with WordPerfect, Lotus 123, Landcad and Autocad, and various project management software. EXPERIENCE. EDUCATION. AND TRAINING: Bachelor's degree in Park Administration, Landscape Architecture or related field required, plus three years of park planning or landscape architectural experience, including experience in public park design and construction, project implementation, and contract administration. ~pa~ment CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Subject: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Approve Land Trade Between City of North Richland Hills and J.B. Johnston affecting the Iron Horse Golf Course - Agenda Number: Resolution No. 94-14 4/11/94 GN 94-36 The City recently discovered that six (6) tracts of land owned by J.B. Johnston are part of Iron Horse Golf Course and have been continually used as part of the golf course. Additionally, there are seven (7) other tracts of land which are part of the Iron Horse Golf Course property, but are peripheral tracts and are not critical to operation of the course. These seven (7) tracts are adjacent to other property owned by J.B. Johnston. Mr. Johnston has agreed to deed his six (6) tracts currently being used as part of Iron Horse Golf Course to the City. In exchange, the City will deed its seven (7) tracts to Mr. Johnston. No other compensation will be required by either party. The properties to be traded are shown on the attached boundary adjustment map. Recommendation: It is recommended Council approve Resolution No. 94-14, authorizing the Mayor to sign the special warranty deed. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ope.ffi}.. 'ng .BU dget ----G.f Ot¡,l?~¡ 4. _;1 . J?,. i.f ,7 -w'J-' V'~L/'':-:/7V ~ D a ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ Finance Director Page 1 of - . e . Any work related experience resulting in acceptable proficiency levels in the above Experience, Education, and Training is an acceptable substitute for the above specified education and experience requirements. LICENSES AND CERTIFICATES: Texas Class C driver's liœnse. Registered Landscape Architect in the State of Texas and licensed irrigator in the State of Texas is preferred, but not required. APPROVED: DATE: . . - RESOLUTION NO. 94-14 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: 1. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the special warranty deeds between J.B. Johnston and the City of North Richland Hills. PASSED AND APPROVED this 11th day of April, 1994. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THE STATE OF TEXAS, . KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT ) That I, J. B. Johnston, of the County of Tarrant, state of Texas, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration paid in cash, receipt acknowledged, have Granted, Sold and Conveyed, and by these presents do Grant, Sell and Convey, unto the City of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation, the six (6) tracts of land (Tract 3, Tract 6, Tract 7, Tract 10 Tract 11, and Tract 13) described by metes and bounds on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto, made a part hereof and incorporated herein the same as if set out verbatim. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in anywise belonging unto the said City of North Richland Hills, Texas, its successors and assigns forever and said Grantor does hereby bind his heirs executors and administrators, to Warrant and Forever Defend, all and singular the said premises unto the said City of North Richland Hills, its successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming, or to claim the same, or any part thereof, by, through or under me but not otherwise. . day at North Richland Hills, Texas, this ~ , 1994. 9~ STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT Acknovledqement Mailing Address of Grantee: City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 instrument was acknowledged before me on the ,. ~t. 1994, by J. B. Johnston. Not!;;~t~, ~a~e~exas ,."''''!. ",,\1 ó' 'Ii ,'\"~~....:.~~ l/~*~ :: :cn : ª ~;.4 c,: \ \. -rJ'~ OF 1fç,"'t-~./ '. ~ ···.~-c~ .... . ~ .. .'"~¡¡¡JI'.. ..... ~.I, $..-;;... r;j' ",~. I I Ill', "'().;:;,. " ",\\\; ", "! ,q!n~'\ " day ~ThiS , e EXHIBIT "A" . TRACTS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS TRACT NO. 3 BEING 0.685 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey, Abstract No. 19, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is S 63038'18" E a distance of 1311.63 feet from the Northwest corner of those certain lands conveyed to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (F.S.L.I.C.) by deed recorded in Volume 8652, page 1593 and Volume 8993, Page 1951, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and the Northeast corner of Lot 24. Block 4-R, Park View Hills Addition to the City of Haltom City as recorded in Volume 388-102, Page 35, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; . THENCE S 33037' 14" W, a distance of 255.65 feet to a point; THENCE N 72025'12" W, a distance of 55.22 feet to a point; THENCE N 89025'40" W, a distance of 227.16 feet to a point; THENCE S 61049'46" W, a distance of 114.08 feet to a point; THENCE N 41032'09" E, a distance of 53.29 feet to a point; THENCE N 64009'20" E. a distance of 78.46 feet to a point; THENCE N 86046'32" E, a distance of 65.00 feet to a point; THENCE N 64009'21" E, a distance of 390.07 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.685 acres. TRACT NO.6 BEING 0.236 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey, Abstract No. 19, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is S 05004'58" E a distance of 1968.47 feet from the Northwest corner of those certain lands conveyed to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (F.S.LI.C.) by deed recorded in Volume 8652, page 1593 and Volume 8993, Page 1951, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and the Northeast corner of Lot 24, Block 4-R, Park View Hills Addition to the City of Haltom City as recorded in Volume 388-102, Page 35, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 22018'02" E, a distance of 414.63 feet to a point; THENCE S 06040'50" E, a distance of 102.21 feet to a point; THENCE S 30057'31" W, a distance of 328.97 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.236 acres. e . TRACT NO.7 BEING 0.169 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey, Abstract No. 19, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is S 05004' 58" E a distance of 1968.47 feet from the Northwest corner of those certain lands conveyed to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (F.S.L.I.C.) by deed recorded in Volume 8652, page 1593 and Volume 8993, Page 1951, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and the Northeast corner of Lot 24, Block 4-R, Park View Hills Addition to the City of Haltom City as recorded in Volume 388-102, Page 35, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S 00026'54" E, a distance of 155.00 feet to a point; THENCE S 89025'44" W. a distance of 94.76 feet to a point; THENCE N 30057' 31" E, a distance of 181.85 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.169 acres. TRACT NO. 10 BEING 0.058 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey, Abstract No. 19, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: . BEGINNING at a point which is S 68054'37" E a distance of 1825.14 feet from the Northwest corner of those certain lands conveyed to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (F.S.L.I.C.) by deed recorded in Volume 8652, page 1593 and Volume 8993, Page 1951, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and the Northeast corner of Lot 24, Block 4-R, Park View Hills Addition to the City of Haltom City as recorded in Volume 388-102, Page 35, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 13016'18" E, a distance of 89.67 feet to a point; THENCE S 77037'37" E, a distance of 56.71 feet to a point; THENCE S 44058'37" W, a distance of 102.88 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.058 acres. TRACT NO. 11 BEING 0.137 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey, Abstract No. 19, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is S 77013'52" E a distance of 1922.75 feet from the Northwest corner of those certain lands conveyed to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (F.S.L.I.C.) by deed recorded in Volume 8652, page 1593 and Volume 8993, Page 1951, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and the Northeast corner of lot 24. Block 4-R, Park View Hills Addition to the City of Haltom City as recorded in Volume 388-102, Page 35, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; e THENCE S 01052'01" W. a distance of 62.30 feet to a point; THENCE S 44058'37" W, a distance of 133.43 feet to a point; THENCE N 03058'17" E, a distance of 72.98 feet to a point; THENCE n 47025'54" E, a distance of 123.95 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.137 acres. . TRACT NO. 13 BEING 2.411 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey, Abstract No. 19, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is S 76002'04" E a distance of 1774.23 feet from the Northwest corner of those certain lands conveyed to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation IF.S.LI.C.) by deed recorded in Volume 8652. page 1593 and Volume 8993, Page 1951, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and the Northeast corner of Lot 24, Block 4-R, Park View Hills Addition to the City of Haltom City as recorded in Volume 388-102, Page 35, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; . THENCE N 10007'33" W, a distance of 261.98 feet to a point; THENCE N 01040' 56" W, a distance of 131.09 feet to a point; THENCE N 64036'04" E, a distance of 56.06 feet to a point; THENCE N 31050'27" W, a distance of 49.45 feet to a point; THENCE S 89°26'10" W, a distance of 429.69 feet to a point; THENCE Northeasterly, along and with a curve to the left having a central angle of 5007' 14" and a radius of 1118.92 feet an arc length of 204.94 feet to the P. T. of said curve; THENCE N 79015'57" E, a distance of 50.00 feet to the P.C. of a curve to the right; THENCE Northeasterly, along and with said curve to the right having a central angle of 10029'37" and a radius of 1058.92 feet, an arc length of 193.94 feet to the P.T. of said curve; THENCE N 89045'34" E, a distance of 128.81 feet to a point; THENCE N 87028'10" E. a distance of 100.10 feet to a point; THENCE S 27°58'40" E, a distance of 50.47 feet to a point; THENCE S 01052'00" W, a distance of 349.62 feet to a point; THENCE Continuing, S 01052'00" W, a distance of 66.46 feet to a point; THENCE S 61040'42" W, a distance of 109.40 feet to a point; THENCE N 79026'45" W, a distance of 59.35 feet to the place of beginning and containing 2.411 acres. e SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THE STATE OF TEXAS, . KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT That the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, a Municipal Corporation, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration paid in cash, receipt acknowledged has Granted, Sold and Conveyed, and by these presents does Grant, Sell and Convey, unto J. B. Johnston, of the County of Tarrant, State of Texas the seven (7) tracts of land (Tract 1, Tract 2, Tract 4, Tract 5, Tract 8, Tract 9 and Tract 12) described by metes and bounds on Exhibit A which is attached hereto, made a part hereof and incorporated herein the same as if set out verbatim. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in anywise belonging unto the said J. B. Johnston, his heirs and assigns forever and the said corporation does hereby bind itself, its successors and assigns, to Warrant and Forever Defend, all and singular the said premises unto the said J. B. Johnston, his heirs and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming, or to claim the same, or any part thereof, by, through or under said Corporation but not otherwise. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said corporation has caused these presents to be signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the corporation, at North Richland Hills, Texas, this day of , 1994. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS By: Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF TARRANT ) Corporate Acknowledgement This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day , 1994, by Tommy Brown, Mayor of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, a municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public, State of Texas Mailing Address of Grantee: 4IÞ J. B. Johnston EXHIBIT 11,11 ., . TRACTS TO BE CONVEYED TO DEVELOPER TRACT NO.1 BEING 0.090 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey, Abstract No. 19. Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is S 88057'02" E a distance of 1191.50 feet from the Northwest comer of those certain lands conveyed to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation jF.S.L.I.C.1 by deed recorded in Volume 8652. page 1593 and Volume 8993. Page 1951. Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and the Northeast comer of Lot 24, Block 4·R. Park View Hills Addition to the City of Haltom City as recorded in Volume 388·102. Page 35. Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 89020'49" E. a distance of 75.23 feet to a point; THENCE S 01024'3r E. a distance of 272.94 feet to a point; THENCE N 15029'40" W, a distance of 46.54 feet to a point; THENCE N 31001'20" W. a distance of 92.13 feet to a point: THENCE N 49031.25" W. a distance of 22.21 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.090 acres; TRACT NO.2 BEING 0.208 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey, Abstract No. 19. Tarrant County. Texas and being more particularly described as follows: . BEGINNING at a point which is S 63038'10" E a distance of 1311.63 feet from the Northwest comer of those certain lands conveyed to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (F.S.L.I.C.I by deed recorded in Volume 8652. page 1593 and Volume 8993. Page 1951. Dlld Records of Tarrant County. Texas and the Northeast comer of Lot 24. Block 4-R. Park View Hills Addition to the City of Haltom City as recorded in Volume 3B8-102. Page 35. Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 33°37·14" E. a distance of 198.59 flit to a point: THENCE N 04°05'27" W. a distanCl of 167.33 felt to a point; THENCE S 07052·45" E. a distance of 269.45 feet to a point: THENCE S 64009'21. W, a distance of 149.96 flit to the place of beginning and containing 0.208 acres. TRACT NO.4 BEING 0.005 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey. Abstract No. 19. Tarrant Count'(. Texas and being more panicuiarly de.cribed as foUows: BEGINNING at a point which is S 38°' "55" E a distance of 1056.47 feet from the Northwest comer of tho.e cenain lands conveyed to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (F.S.L.I.C.I by dlld recorded in Volume 8652. page 1593 and Volume 8993. Page 1951, Deed Records of Tarrant Count'(, Texas and the Northeast comer of Lot 24. Block 4-R. Park View Hills Addition to the City of Haltom City as recorded in Volume 388·102. Page 35. Plat Records of Tarrant Count'(, Texas; THENCE S 41°32.08" W. a distance of l' .71 feet to a point; THENCE S 64°09'21" W, a distance of 1'6.10 feet to a point: THENCE N 61°49.46" E. a distance of 1'0.90 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.005 acres. TRACT NO.5 BEING 0.lB6 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey. Abstract No. 19. Tarrant Count'(. Texas and being more particulariy described as follows: - BEGINNING at a point which is S 27057.16" E a distance of 1037.00 feet from the ~ortnwest corner of those certain lands conveyed to the Federal S:JvinCls <Jno Loan Insurance Corporation jf,S.L.I.C. by deed recorded in Volume t:i652. page 1593 and Volume 8993. Page 1951. Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and the Northeast corner of Lot 24, Block 4·R, Park View Hills Addition to the City of Haltom City as recorded in Volume 388-102. Page 35. Plat Recoras of Tarrant County, Texas; . THENCE N 61029' 22" W, a distance of 60.70 feet to a point; THENCE N 43041'46" W, a distance of 56,01 feet to a point; THENCE N 19000'06" W, a distance of 79.05 feet to a pOint; THENCE N 04°01 '45" W, a distance of 53.84 feet to a pomt; THENCE S 32051'54" E, a olstance of 119.30 feet to a POint; THENCE S 27053'55" E. a distance of 62.75 feet to a point; THENCE S 84042'05" E. a distance of 97.12 feet to a pOint; THENCE S 64°18'30" W. a distance of 77.04 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.186 acres. TRACT NO.8 BEING 1.445 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey. Abstract No. 19. Tarrant County. Texas and being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at a point which is S 2802B'51" E a distance of 1880.51 feet from the Northwest corner of those certain lands conveyed to the Federal Savings and loan Insurance Corporation (F.S.L.I.C.! by deed recorded in Volume 8652. page 1593 and Volume 8993. Page 1951. Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas and the Northeast corner of lot 24. Block 4-R. Park View Hills Addition to the City of Haltom City as recorded in Volume 388·102. Page 35. Plat Records of Tarrant County. Texas; THENCE N 35034'54" E. a distance of 296.13 feet to a point; THENCE S 17051' 19" W, a distance of 452.73 feet to a pOint; THENCE S 27051' 00" E. a distance of 158.44 feet to a point: THENCE S 28000'09" E. a distance of 119.59 feet to a point; THENCE S 89°25'44" W. a distance of 140.00 feet to a point; THENCE N 12023'04" W. a distance of 465.44 feet to the place of beginning and containing 1.445 acres. TRACT NO.9 . BEING 1.984 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey. Abstract No. 19. Tarrant County. Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is S 68054'37" E a distance of 1825.14 feet from the Northwest corner of those certain lands conveyed to the Federal Savings and loan Insurance Corporation (F.S.L.I.C.! by deed recorded in Volume 8652. page 1593 and Volume 8993. Page 1951. Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas and the Northeast corner of lot 24. Block 4-R, Park View Hills Addition to the City of Haltom City as recorded in Volume 388-102, Page 35. Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S 40057' 14" E. a distance of 68.20 feet to a point; THENCE S 89°31'03" E. a distance of 74.37 feet to a point; THENCE S 29°01'57" E. a distance of 31.26 feet to a point; THENCE S 76°43'07 W. a distance of 44.26 feet to a point; THENCE S 44019' 23" W. a distance of 101.43 feet to a point: THENCE S 64°18'26" E. a distance of 79.51 feet to a point; THENCE S 64040'34" W. a distance of 80.18 feet to a point: THENCE S 52055'00" W. a distance of 95.38 feet to a point: THENCE S 72°18'01" W. a distance of 40.88 feet to a point: THENCE S 42°43'09" W. a distance of 121.41 feet to a point; THENCE 554039'27" W. a distance of 126.67 feet to a point: THENCE 558°18'43" W. a distance of 181.53 feet to a point; THENCE 578°31'45" W. a distance of 68.55 feet to apoint; THENCE N 41018'15" E. a distance of 761.92 feet to the place of beginning and containing 1 .984 acres. e TRACT NO. 12 . BEING 0.072 acres out of the Telitha Akers Survey, Abstract No. 19. Tarrant County. Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is S 77013'52" E a distance of 1922.75 feet from the Northwest corner of those certain lands conveyed to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (F.S.L.I.C.) by deed recorded in Volume 8652, page 1593 and Volume 8993. Page 1951. Deed Recoros of Tarrant County. Texas and the Northeast corner of Lot 24. Block 4-R. Park View Hills Additiccon to the City of Haltom City as recorded in Volume 388-102. Page 35. Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas: THENCE N 01052'01" E. a distance of 37.82 feet to a point; THENCE N 61040'39" E. a distance of 17.49 feet to a point; THENCE N 28058'24" E. a distance of 32.85 feet to a point; THENCE N 44°45'33" W. a distance of 41.39 feet to a point; THENCE N 76051' 27" E. a distance of 50.80 feet to a point; THENCE S 05°39'46" E. a distance of 41.22 feet to a point; THENCE S 25033'06" W. a distance of 44.40 feet to a point; THENCE S 47°25'54" W. a distance of 51.30 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.072 acres. . e !h i~ . ,I t .. . _..... ''\.. ~ \\ \ '\ . , ~~~ \ '\. ,:,.. \ , -..... .....~ : '\~ ~8 "'" ~.~ , 1 ~ . , ~n j "'" .:.~:./ '. : '" ~ ~ ð:~ '\ r a "'. ! I ~ ¡ ~ "" ~~-': .. ".. l ."..",. : " I '. . ". . " ~'I ! ", ~L ~ 1 , .!I~ <I ~j¡ .......... I ~C!i ;t; z ~ t. Qo _ ......... ¡ w ~ H'" U = I ........... :ii.... ""-. I!¡ ..:;.,\ ""'''' . ...... . ........... i~::« .................... 'Sif .,.."., Ia.· ."..,.."" d,y 1ts- þ .~~.......... )S ........... ......... ........... ......... ........... ......... ........... ......... - ........... ......... ..') ;! ~~ wI /' . : ;~ I z i i i i i i i i w ;::: dø L..L. ~.~ o ~i¡¡ .~ i z ~ i gs i i i i i i I j , ~\~ . .__.._.._oo____.._.__...J .¥L..-..-..-..-..----..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-. N ~. ..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..- ~u ~. . -... :) o z w <..9 n w ~ .... &WI ~ N ~'f5"JF w 1&1.33 !i1 ~ ~& ~O o V\ tJ. o ~- o~~ /~r o~ .. 2 .. I· o , . a.: = .... ï 17 . 51~~ . II t t~ la /' ~~" . In 2 ~ ~ < :s: '" .... ~ < ~ .... ~ I o i o ' ~I ~ <~~ w aIS~~ w"" ~ ~~; ¡¡:u~ In ; :æ , w ~ ~ ~ ª ~ 2 ~ ¡¡j ~ o .... <J' ~ ~ i ~ I ~. ~ ~ (} o .... ~ ~J W G:. co ;¡: o ff C> ~ ~ ð u I § :5 >- '" (} 15 a: U- C> i u z o ¡:: Õ c <I( u. == 0 ~ I- -J a: ~ :¡: o :z 0 c :z CI) W <i( W :I: ..J ~ I- J: <0:( 0 2 ..J I- a: :I: I- a: o z CI) <i( x W I- CI) I- Z W :;¡: I- CI) :J "') o c.( >- a: <i( c z ::> o In s: o c <0:( w ~ .. .. . '" '" ~ @ @ ~ .... .... ! ! ! ........... ~.:¡.~ .....,... +........ '. ~J ~ j~ ~h ~' ....~~ AI oOÞ-ž,..š-....... ~ .~!Ir ,p.>--- ~~_,ø·q. .._ . .,.........- 1\: .................. f'g ~o .~~ ~¡¡IIo:.q.'?-.. -..-.. . ~ã . ",1 2 ~ ~ h~ .... 2 ~j q~ h~ I .. '" ---- --- r-- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 4/11/94 Subject: Amendment to the Building Code regarding automatic fire sprinkler systems in existing buildings. Agenda NumÜ~~4-37 Ordinance No. 1979 At the March 28, 1994 City Council meeting, staff was directed to prepare an amendment to the Building Code to exempt existing vacant buildings from installing automatic fire sprinkler systems. The cost of retrofitting an existing building with a fire sprinkler system significantly increases the market rent without improving the marketability of the structure. Attached is a proposed ordinance which will amend the Building Code to delete the fire sprinkler system requirements on existing single story buildings and high rise buildings. Approval of the ordinance will have no effect on the sprinkler system requirements for new construction. RECOMMENDA nON: It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 1979. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget ., Other it----.- ~ ~au ~ ó~~~~~ a ~~4Z- Depart~t Head Signature ( / City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of ~ ORDINANCE NO. 1979 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE #1813, THE BUILDING ORDINANCE, REGARDING LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENT FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills adopted a new building ordinance number 1813 on June 22, 1992; and WHEREAS, the building ordinance contains provisions for life safety requirements for existing buildings regardless of the date of their construction; and WHEREAS, this regulation appears to be over-restrictive for businesses by requiring automatic fire sprinkler systems; now therefore, e BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, Ordinance 1813 as amended, Section 4. Adoption of the Uniform Building Code Appendix, be amended to delete the following: CHAPTER 1 DNISION I LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS OTHER THAN HIGH RISE BUILDINGS CHAPTER 1 DIVISION I LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR EXISTING HIGH RISE BUILDINGS 2. THAT, the remainder of Ordinance 1813, as amended remain as is. 3. e SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would - have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 4. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance 1813, The Building Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 11TH DAY OF APRIL, 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: It CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Managerrent Information Services Department: .a, b· t Contractual Services for Computer Study ~u ec: Associates in the AIrount of $12,000.00 3/11/94 Council Meeting Date: - LeBlanc & Agenda Number: PU 94-31 For the past several years the individual departments of these items has been Purchasing Department. computer needs have been determined by using the equipment and the purchasing through a collective effort of the Although several "computer plans" have been devised over the years, the City has not had the services of outside consultants for this type of planning. City Administration was made aware of the work of one consultant in a neighboring city with similar computer applications and was very pleased with their finished product. The Management Information Services Department contacted this consultant and has been utilizing his expertise in several other aspects of the city's computer applications. The computerization in place throughout the city today has created somewhat of an .. information superhighway" that is necessary to provide the quality services expected by our citizens and customers. e To ensure the most efficient and orderly growth of this computer infrastructure, we have been using this consultant, Mr. Brady LeBlanc of LeBlanc and Associates, to assess our current and future needs and recommend a proper course of action to continue and enhance this level of service. To date, Mr. LeBlanc has assisted us in gathering and analyzing information relevant to our computer needs. His billings have reached some $4,000.00. In order to complete his work and provide the City Council and Staff with a long term plan, another $8,000.00 in funding is required. We are requesting authorization to complete this study and report on our long term needs. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the expenditure of $12,000.00 for LeBlanc and Associates for professional services and final report. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget _ Othe¡ Finance Review Acct. Number 01-40-01-6500 nt Funds Available . Finance Director t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works A ward of BId for Teakwood Court Storm Drain Improvements Council Meeting Date: 4/11/94 Subject: Agenda Number: PW 94-09 Bids were received for this project on April 1, 1994, and the low bidders for both alternates are shown below: Alternate No. 1 - Patch Street Pavement Bidder Amount Bid Calendar Days Bid Time Patco Utilities, Inc. Tri-Tech Construction Circle "C" Construction $70,494.70 $70,598.40 $74,057.00 45 45 * Alternate No.2 - Reconstruct Full Width of Pavement Bidder Amount Bid Calendar Days Bid Time Tri-Tech Construction Patco Utilities, Inc. Circle "C" Construction $82,669.90 $86,346.00 $93,648.00 45 45 * *No days bid. The installation of a storm drain in the street will require a large amount of street patching when the contractor is finished. Staffs opinion is the City should consider paying $12,175.20 more and completely resurface this section of street where the storm drain is to be installed. This will provide a much better surface to drive on and maintain a much better barrier against water getting to the subgrade. Fundin~ Source: Budget Revised Additional Funding œw 93-46) Budget Required Engineering $ $ 15,000 $15,000 Construction 7 0.000 85.000 15 . 000 Totals $70.000 $1 00.000 $30.000 The additional funding of $30,000 maybe appropriated from Unspecified Drainage Fund Balance (currently over $700, (00). Recommendation: Staff recommends Council award the bid to Tri- Tech Construction in the amount of $82,669.90 (Alternate No.2) for a period of 45 calendar days and authorize the transfer of funds as indicated above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Otf!;{ igna ure CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director Page 1 of fTTTlil.'" _~L~-~ r I' î¡lr!i~rra-1 \=1~~c~~~ .~" UJ '------- q =f-; _ ~ ~ ~ ,J ----4,...h - ,,~ ',11 , \ ,U ----4 -H = _ 1\y... ~ .......-~......... - I W I _ ,.... _ '::J [j _,- ~\fi , _ f- _ _f- .1 I ¡:::, ';::J iI![ f- - -I- _I- _ ~ O~ r . ~ \ J ~ ~ = I-~ I- Q 11--4- L illi'>' [l-,i ,.. - L-L-.J u~ ~I- I- ¡::~ V .-"=~I I-iff L~"~\~, I"IJ .J ·~D~ f-f- If' 1,T'-1~ -I- rr I .¡..¡., ~ r ' ,,1_ '--'_: ~~~~;> ;t -- hT~' " ",,,~t: , '''''I V t::::,.. _ _ ' , I~: ~i: ~ ,..i=;d~ ;} ~èr'T~ ~~§~ "~l~~j--I =~~ I~II'" lJ ~:.'ì 81 II f-~ll~[l I c-= " I "-JJ..L \' .;-\ 11. JJ - . I r - ., ;:¡_" s ~ --1 ......,_........ T Ilì \ ..,,¡¡ == E ~->---iR-iO L to'>" ~ "'- ....... 1 I~~'j~n ]' ~~ II 'ð9.\~ E;:: ~ ~.I- I T f- ~ ffi 1~~~'1 ~ ~ I L- ~ T ill \ II ,)-,Her ---.II \,l. i- _c- ~ IfUttJ.l..l '- ~ -iI 1 I \ L oc: \ '(' -_ t L...I-- [~ I I Hl' I I ~ rr '-I-- t:D 'c 1\"1 .......H -hp:.-/.. t. rJ' T .11.11.1 r- I IJ~ I~ . H ~ ~ I rll-lo~ JL ~¡:j )'~ .- Jf-,_ I ,1=\ ~1t'1 ~\.,,,. 1 ! ;£., r [l ~~~Y~~/'\T 1- 'L ~ h J~ I - \ I r I- r I I l[, ~'/ ~ í ~. ~ p' ./ I I I' .,," 'I i I ~ t'S ¡. '--~ .- I---t ~ r:.¿ I l- I? r-: I I - I I",--! ~ I- =~ - 1 - .... I ¡::¡:: t( I r I-- ,...f.-\J '~\:j - -j ~- --;=¡ 1~ l =~ C: "- _ I 11í~ F · I ~~ ~- ~ E Î ii,: ¡¡j f u -; : / '" = =~ " ~ ~ ~o~~~~~ E ± L )~í 1 D:~ - '1 - ~ 7 r-;:: m _ : I- 1-\ I j; , ! ~ c ,i..oIo. _I- .I-f- I.Ii!: U I I - 1 " _I- -~ --r 1 r , ...... 1t' I r- H I I ;--w !A. Ü If;, J-lI~~ I \ 1 r--- Ë: -<¡:¡ 1111 ., \ \ II I J'" ~.. I""' - '\. 1 hi T \ I ...L-- ~ I \ L ~J' \ëõÙ'.l I~--:;-~ ~-~~~-ïI . E= \ ~IS I Y 11 \t -' ''':~r-~, I ~ ~~' ~ 11111 1'- r : - ; - -;~,p~'" ,~~-rP\.~ ~~'~\. [iL i ~. ~ - 1 l~c '-= æ --1 iT! L \..-\Î III/HI. : 1'1 I J I .1 \ T ". to"'" - í~I",".k. I 1 "f'~ \) 1 . ~ rïì 1-:!.,.........,.... ~ . ----..L.-~ ~:tL. ,;=;: ~" , :4Ef:jffi! f-, IlL! ]1 ~ "'-1'"'" il I T1 I i I l-- : +~, Ii :: '" Iß I '-~ >-J ~ 1= ,-1-i -= i :dUll -n. I' r~~r f- ;::;:: = r 13 ~:,. rf ~' 1= ì1Tr-\ ~ç::. 11 r: I i L: II _ _ f- 1-1- I- ~:::J o'l-I.ÐÇ}I E: 1\li IF- 1 ç: L· .' ~l A. ....~.A~I I J ~ ,n~ ~,>J.';r\~ TT' to.... ~~UIIIIIW / I 1-1 I.b:t [I I ~-1 t:1J1IIIIItrr:r - p' A L-- T : I i Ii -. '-.r ,-.- = o\Jc.>'-I~ ~ _",,'> ì ...fir' 1 I I ¡.J_!-II -:::- ,'II II II vA'f ;= ~~9.\.j , / ~ ,1-41 Illi Ç: _' T J 0-Y"'...cr::: 0) /' I II j'::::¡ J I/I}¡::,r::. _1 I' \ '""-rV!!1 /J¿. r~ L :-<'j'--, I \ \ / T ~ !.i /'// \ I II L'"1 ..J I I/~\\ì I, '1- F, U ........ ~ ;~..\\\.V". ~ x ,"~,~\. \) I. I. ~ I R Ë:f9~ iT 7ì~r'(/.~L ." f"- = LI i~~ JJ..IJ//( 1 ~ E ~ 1111::1 ffi ~\~Ç¡ ITC>',¡, ~ ,,~ ~-Ê .::;rrr ~&3lTn ~-; fh.:::" aIFI:1f! cr~ ·.:Qr,f7 ;~;X ~~~>~ :-- ~~rT! .1 LLgf.]ltff:~~, -., --¡(IT . ,t-~-, Iii I:. 7,-<: ~kl'."cr~n_ _ ji-.t-n , .I-~ ~::::¡=Y ¡ ,l~~ $!j, 'I I! ;::¡3 E W llllû.: ,:ï)¡W~)~/f;T n T I"" l-=:'-~ ~ ~. li¡ ¡;_¡,--:... "¡..::¡>11 dJ J....~. .... x.::;¡~ OJ.I., I ~a.;lll ~ _lJ _ ~/ 'I I r-:-.::;.....¡--- !...~--J ·';'.;jSf-'-"-=i/TT ,1 IT\7-:;{j'~~ ~ìT: lJ~~_ ~--:~>//~~f"'::::---L-I 'LID ~ t-i ~~::j ,·111 .1l1W;::j ~w,~ '::1,'\1 j J~i~ I i _, I , ~~ -Hj§'·'L. Jrm [I.~ :>'~~~tIL., ~t ~~/\\ ...J . -,---" __~.'__I._ Tft°~~t~ª;~I~_, I~;êi.. ~~R:iJ¡.uw- lL+#"~ ¡jt-r----:L¿ .____'~~.J,-,--!.··,~øl TO ~ HH"', 1 /"Î Iron\. III ŒI}' rT JI5í m\\ TITII \ '~ \ C I ..... .......~ \ L-.'_ I I \ I 1 : 'I \ \ Ii ~\.\.t If¡ w ~"' []III . . . VIí' WASHINGTON & AsSOCIATES, INc. ENGINEERS. PLANNERS April 5, 1994 Mr. Greg Dickens City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180-0609 Reference: 181-002 Teakwood Court Storm Drainage Improvements Bids were received for construction of the referenced project in accordance with the advertised schedule at 2:00 p.m. on April 1, 1994. Bids were received for two (2) alternate types of pavement reconstruction. Alternate No. 1 provides for repaving only the partial street section that will be impacted by the proposed storm sewer construction. Alternate No.2 provides for repaving the entire street width, excluding curb and gutter. We have reviewed and tabulated the bids and are attaching a copy of the bid tabulation. Patco Utilities, Inc. is low bidder on Alternate No.1 in the amount of $70,494.70 and Tri-tech Construction, Inc. is low bidder on Alternate No.2 in the amount of $82,669.90. We recommend award of the construction contract to the low bidder on the City's choice of Alternate No. 1 or Alternate No.2. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, WÁsHINGTON_ & ASSOCIATES, INC. t ~---"!1 ~ '( (// fr' ì 'ý i, /J.____-IÏ¿,--4j:L.·· - I..__'v/ - I David R. Washington, P. ..) enclosure: Bid Tabulation cc: 040594·1.DRW 500 GRAPEVINE HWY. · SUITE 375 · HURST, TEXAS 76054 · 817/485-0707 . METRO 817/498-3077 . FAX 817/485-4106 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Award of Bid to All-Tex Paving Inc. Subject: for 1994 Chip Seal Program Council Meeting Date: 4/11/94 Agenda Number: PW 94-10 Bids were received for the 1994 Chip Seal Program on April 4, 1994 and the low bidders are shown below: Bidder Amount of Bid Calendar Days Bid All- Tex Paving, Inc. Sun mount Corp. Weldon & Bill Jordan AP AC- Texas, Inc. $62,335.30 $77,845.00 $88,535.00 $99,209.00 45 * 30 60 90 *Bid time inadvertently left blank on bid forms, buLsupplied within 3 hours after bid opening. References for the low bidder were contacted by staff and only positive comments were received. Some additional funds will be available from the initial budget authorized by Council which will allow the City to add streets to be resurfaced to this project by change order. Staff will puruse this option and bring back any proposal for your approval. Funding Source: Sufficient funds were budgeted on December 13, 1993 in PW 93-43 for this project. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council award the bid to All- Tex Paving, Inc. in the amount of $62,335.30 for a period of 45 calendar days. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Ot r Acct. Number 13-23-10-6000 Sufficient Funds Av 'Iable Finance Director Page 1 of _.- e -----.. ¡ I ¡ 'iHHI.t ~ROYE on ~ L':/" Q I· .. . -I It: ~ I ¡ ~ LrudL.H!ilLLUJ..~C ,,:"IT p"."r- -t - "'.~~ -, '{\\ · .0" '-I i nth: .~ i~"~~I" J; .~.-. ill j~' '----{;¡I Ii: I : ttr:.j ----J :; SE1 RD -, - . -~.L ,,4, _ ~ TT-=- ~ CREEN 'H"~ WOODS LN. J ~¡ ;'- -~ 111 ~ -t=-~ ! h I ~ ¡.-. ~ ~~ . -::-- .", _l.._ ~ 11 ii' ~I ~ _ I ! I I I ;;,. .:---:------ : - ~~ ~-.-- ~~'" ~ ~SAYERS LN. I !- ....~ _-..,-:---:.J --... ~~~I..J ~II ..\.- IR~rF'CLDRP -f I ·~""!t~I.J-~:_~_.1-:.::-'r I~ I 'jJ--r-;- J ,i : r'r::::;~-~_...j~-{J I J J r~CRESTVIEW DR.~ "'f-L j . I 1 I -" =-f' - -::=;, ~ ¡;¡ I , ' i \ 1--- ~I ' · ¡r . - -...... _..... >--r-,;:;¡ ; I-JHICHT r~R -.J- C::¡U-~ ,,' J. r·_·~:;·_-_. ~~-.J - - ~ ~ C- -- )- II I I - ¡,,¡~----- .'~- '~-+---,.',.:..--_~J t:-.'-:. =: '. \-----.,-r r-= II -j I 'I ' l =.-- .-- ~ ----~ ... ' HltH-1tJrl'R DR - J}---¡ i ) ~ . ..tf!"~D'5t"'~ ' - '. .-- j-.,!UCHro"" ~.. I gr'. I ~ ~ (1:J;;:drODEU ST. _,' II · - .-: '-----" Jw ~ ~ BUC¡ IC ISTF±~ ~ >c'" ~ , I -., i-----..., ~ ~,.. \ ï t .\., ..~ , -Y QIRANDY D~. "'r---- ' "' U .' , . .-. II . W ~ h ìl I ~I,..---,~ Ç= \! I ~ . ::: LJ .c=: mw' J ':1 U : ¡ 'I;: ! ~ ,~r ..J-'-' ..-. , ~"" + ~,~ -J--..Cl'~g~ ~- CHAPMA RO I /' f----'. L!J_U L-i-- ~ ,I' 1111'~jl'liJII ,. . P =-:!:=II . , 'i h- "II I!; '. i ~,' 1 : ,I I -' , ,'-----t--- +---,---' '" ..í ~,I ' ""':ìtt -" '-1-, f-, 'rfl' :_~i--t=::::7Cù...c-----r "-- . t . :. . 1/' ',--":1 ::::;~ II. - - -.:--:,'2 -:i'--.fTf.l..·· BR1Hl.-,LrY I- ,or --- ,.---" I' W-J. . - '--I~. r. . - - -----. ~ --, .;..~ . 1~U. ~ .-.-......,. ir)o1,,·c'.1!"- + _ .~L· -~. ---. .,.' '~'-r-1L....-L..~ .~ t-. . -L- --. I l-=::¡ ~ _ 1 -~ : j I',' ~~,~ DR. ~¡ , .~.~ ~·-"-·r"-:-:--:-, ISTE.ÉPÙWo~~R;;-;:', L,.'o'~iYO" -. -, O'BRIA. N W,',¿ I QL ¡ III I. ~ ;../' ...-r- -L -./,. ~~.. ~: 1:,11,-- ..----A:-, ~ '~=-~r;;;;;;;;r .~\'to. -. ~l-CRESTWOOD CIR. E. ~ ¡I- ~ .~' 1 =1' -~ k';-ìTIT:: (\'~ I ~ ' . <~', - . ..-~ r ---rj I . [11 ' f::-' 1,1 'I mr. : ,,'"- ~~~ ~ r-ro~' iM\ ,; I I I : ,.., , ~--~: ; ~~ -" - i e QL : I I ~ ,!H"'R"OOI?..M.."~ _: .~S~~P~lO "L .~~'::-':;::;""'F ~~ . ../':'"ELDOR~~? DR. ~~'7~---'-~~~!'~-i¡ . ! _.~l i i i ~~\' '7t'~ -~~'~ ..-. '. ,. ---;.' r~ t·..., , !ttt ~~ Q~_-o... ~ i ; i \,()\\L r;:;-7i~ I j , . "-';~ ,'--~ :--_"~r ~";.NEVA·DA TR. : ..' ,~~,\\, t.: i ~. . - ~ I L-i' ~ _ ~ .. I \ 1· 1 I I -: i I '- ." ._-.- ~";"".J.J.,. L==._~"".' ,I" ( , ,: ( , ~ i.1 J - .~-. +,-,- r,~ ' >.. L: , , , .~. LARI'AT TRAIL ., -' -~._ / ...--...... -- _ ._11 '.. _¥ '---1 , EDISON DR. -~..~' _ L-=-:~_--+.., ~_, l ¡ '\ ~ '. :r-- -- ,~ ,--rl--'---. ~ ~.. -' L~ '-."L' I .-----.j I .. , g . "" ¡ ¡ .. -, . ".. '.', - U1i ~~ ~ TABO'R DR. 'á'læ.."/ ---o./;áQ¡I~r:'¡ ~~ . \ J~ ; I .,~/~ ; ;. . ... , ~,; ~f' ..,..........' ..Î' , -l '. r .- ~: : ~ -. ::t ~,/' ~<'" -, Y· ~'1 : '. ""!'."1Y; f,'· , ;'. BONZER ~ ,. .,...,;- . ST. -:. ~. -.. ----'" / i . ;; e ~ , SCALE 1· . 3000' e Proposed 1994 Street Seal Coat Program STREETS THAT ARE CANDIDATES FOR CHIP SEAL "IICIIN'O Ç'-": 0 . KNOWlTON-ENGlISH-FLOWERS, 'NC. CCJIIIUI.~~,,_---, <õiOC'''''"IC IN'O_MAIION SY$UMS .... ,.......-.. ... ..... . ..~... ~"'. ............ .......... e . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas April 4, 1994 Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-248, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1994 CHIP SEAL PROGRAM BID TABULA TION AND RECOMMENDA TION OF A WARD Bids were received today for the referenced project. This project includes chip sealing of seventeen (17) streets throughout the City. Attached is a project fact sheet showing the estimated quantities for each street, a typical section detail, and a map showing the street locations. Four (4) contractors submitted bids as presented on the attached detailed e tabulation. The following is a summary of the bids: NO. BIDDER TOTAL BID DAYS 1. ALL-TEX Paving, Inc. $62,335.30 * 2. Sunmount Corporation 77,845.00 30 3. Weldon & Bill Jordan Const., Inc. 88,535.00 60 4. APAC-TEXAS, Inc. 99,209.00 90 * NOTE: 45 Calendar Days provided by Contractor per letter dated April 4, 1994, (see attached). We have had some recent experience with the low bidder on paving projects in the Cities of Hillsboro and Watauga. You may wish to contact Mr. Gene Cravens, City Manager of Hillsboro at (817) 582-3171, or Mr. Terry Hafer, Director of Public Works, at (817) 582- 3478 regarding their experience with the performance of the low bidder in that City. Also, you may wish to confer with Mr. Carlton Addy, Assistant Director of Public Works in Watauga, at 281-8047, X-I041, regarding his experience with ALL-TEX Paving, Inc. We are not familiar with the low bidder's work on Chip Seal projects, therefore, we would recommend that the contractor provide a list of similar projects with references who can be contacted regarding their past performance on this type of paving work. e In the absence of any negative comments regarding the performance of the low bidder on other similar chip seal projects, we would recommend that the contract be awarded to ALL- TEX Paving, Inc., 2462 Walnut Ridge, Dallas, Texas, 75229, in the amount of $62,335.30, for a period of 45 Calendar Days. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO 817/267-3367. FAX 817/354-4389 e e e April 4, 1994 3-248, 1994 Chip Seal Program Tabulation of Bids and Recommendation of Contract A ward We will be present at the April 11, 1994, Council Meeting to assist you with answers to any questions which the Council may have concerning this project. Meanwhile, please call if we can be of further service in this regard. '" ~i&Cb-' ~CHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RW A/ra/Enclosures/Bids.248/ cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Deputy City Manager Mr. Larry Cunningham, Director of Finance Mr. Jimmy Cates, Street Superintendent (\ 0 õ ~ r- OO 0 0 'il. ¡...: en C!C! 0 CO e en 0 ono an on CD z Ü (')0 C') m 0 ~- .,. It) CIS U> ~on rt:i a.. z~ ~ co <:r: ~ tit ~£1 O:r: ..... ~i!:~ r-W ..J a: - 00 iDoo ¡: z~ (')0 a¡ ~¡S ;;; ::::>a: "":ó Uf-lL a.. ~o za:a: I 0 .... o 0 ~ (J) 01 OlLf- on ..JCD< ¡::- ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ r- oo 0 0 'il. en 00 0 C') 0 Ilió an It) Ü "'0 .. (')on cir-- lit z ,... r-- 0 .... ,... ~ tit < ~ N c.. æ a: CD r-W 00 0 ..... 1X - ü ~ ~ ~ z_ ~o on ::::>a: ~ci z ~ - 0 a.. ~o ~XW I on 001<: g I (\ ::¡ m !i .... z .< ¡::- ~ q 0 ~ en c.. a: Z 0 ¡::: r- oo 0 'il. :-5 en U'!II:! C') 0 on 01 an It) :::::I Ü ~~ (') C CD 01_ .. C') ~ coon Ñ m on e ~ co 0 C tit Z ~w CD ;~~ r-W 010 za:on N z~ II:!C! 5f-..... N <~~ on ::::>a: 0(') c..3 on a.. ~(') I 0 ~~~ '" .... 01 N ..J~..J .. ..J < £ <NO ~ \1"- ~ 00 on co . z- 01 . ~ ~!z -0 (') , a.. 0:( co ~ ::::> CJ Iii r- >=z f- < Z ,0 0 ::::> enr- U ~ C rn C m > z ç,¡~ I- 0:( 0 ~ z c CD li! :J a: c ~ . "C 0 0:( m en CD C a en ãí :E z - III.,. ãí;:! 0:( w ti ~g¡ë z ~ 0 Om ...J ...J Ü C ~ 0:( I < "0 ~_w ~ li!'äi (J :t: a: c'" g CIS_ ã: CD CD ~ C!' :g "[::J: Ü en en t5 0 ~i'f~ü en a..x .- <> a: W ..r:: ., ~ Q., (\ ..r::;:!C C Ü .. 11:: ·z CDü ...J (')00:(0:( III CD I < ""~8c .. III :J CIS ð w 00 "·w OlD CI) z~~C ü.. e ¡.;;, Q., ID·-~Z CDli! o Ü ". W -..r:: ~ J: ~ä:~t< "~~ en 0:( a (,) ¡wo:(w wZCen ;;.: ~ ~ I~CC m ~I ~(\ ~Oiiiiii e e u ~ ~- ~ ~ a ti I J: ~ Ç3 ~ I ~ A~ -~ a ~ N Õ l- N en 0 GI U CI 41 a.. I-W zº ::¡a: a.. I- en 0 U I-W zº ::¡a: a.. Z 0 ¡:: I- :s 00 0 0 en C!C! 0 ~ ::I 0 mo øi ØI II) U 00 a:I CC!.'<t 0 N < 5: co a) ~ - ØI C 0 ~ CD ìii 0 ... ~ ~ I-W NO ~~~ N zº '<to ~ ::¡a: ~ci w - a: I a.. _0 'ïð~ ~ 0 '<t OlD - '" - < 'a: ¡;:- n.qo ~ <n.u. ~ ~ 00 \1"- lOCO Z~ m . . ,.;0 ~ :5< CO . a..::¡ 'J- 0 Iii l- - >=z < z 0 ::¡ cti~ 0 en 0 ãi ~ Z I- 0 0 Z CD . :! ::::I a: 0 Ø) ~ 0 < ãi Ø) :::E 0 .- "''<t 41 Z Em. Z Qj~ < w :::E J:mci 0 o CI ...J ...J < -o':W· ¡:: U.5 ~ < a: c'<t~ a.. ãiãi (,) ~ ..!:cU ~ ã: GI GI g .c o.W ~ U en en 0 co .2 < ~ en 0.... a: '<t a: - W .- (,) .c 41 Q. N.c~O 0 U ~ ....J I 1: . Z GlU (')0« '" GI < ..Zo ~ '" W 0-00 ::::I 41 Z 0 ··W ~ om (f) mÇ;o;:O U.. Q. .- Z Glãi OUooW .. - .c :I: ., ..W~~ .~~ LLa:1- 0 IW~W en< wZ en .. ~ I~OO ¡¡; -N :':::Oãiãi W I- ~LL-TEX PRVING INC.. ID:214-484-0076 RPR 04'94 13:47 No.003 P.02 April 4, 1994 Gregory Dickens Public Works Director City of North Richland Hills 7301 N E Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 e Re: 1994 Chip Seal Program Dear Greg: w. appreciate the opportunity we had to bid the above referenced projeot for you. We inadvertently left out the number of calendar days that it will take to complete the project. We are confident that 45 days will be adequate for this jOb. ·If you have any questions' regarding this matter, please contact me. Thank you. DA/aw e ASPHALT & CONCRETE 2462 WALNUT RIDGE DALLAS. TEXAS 75229 (214) 243·5522 metro 263-4120 e e e K-E-f NO. 3·24; City of North Richland Hills 1994 CHIP SEAL PROGRAM ESTIMATED QUANTITIES ASPHALT ASPHALT NO. STREET - FROM / TO LENGTH WIDTH AREA (FEET) (FEET) (S.Y.) 1. Crestwood Circ. E. - N. Rich. Blvd./Jean Ann 1,360 27 4,670 2. Steeplewood Dr. . N. Rich. Blvd./Crestw. Circ. 780 27 2,340 3. Lariat Trail· Circlewood Ct.rrabor Dead End 820 27 2,460 4. O'Brian Way - Newman Dr./Cork Lane 880 27 2,640 5. Eldorado Dr. N. - Jerry Jo Dr./Grapevine Hwy. 510 27 1,530 6. Tabor Dr. - Rufe Snow Dr./Lariat Trail 1,260 27 3,780 7. Nevada Trail - Jerri Jo Dr./lndia Trail 1,200 27 3,600 8. Edison dr. - N.E. Loop 820/Grapevine Hwy. 2,200 33 8,070 9. Crestview Dr. - Stoneybrooke Dr ./Cul-de-sac 1,130 27 3,900 , 10. Sayers Ln. - Davis Blvd./Dead End 1,550 27 4,650 Woods Ln. - Davis Blvd./Deadend 1,340 27 I 11. 4,020 I 12. Irish Dr. - Mockingbird Ln./East of Darin St. 2,560 27 7,680 I 13. Buck Street - Hewitt Dr./Deadend 940 27 2,820 14. Bonzer St. - Grapevine Hwy./Jerrell St. 1,000 27 3,000 15. Randy Ln. - Amundson Dr./Sherri Lane 880 27 2,640 16. Odell St. - Smithfield/Deadend 750 27 2,250 I 17. Odell St. - Davis Blvd.lTradonna St. 1,300 27 3,900 , I TOTALS 20,460. 63,950. I I Note: Quantities shown are estimated from Geographical Information System (GIS) map accuracy data, and are not based on detailed field survey data. The contractor will be compensated based on actual field measurements of as-built quantities to be taken by the Owners Resident Project Representative after chip seal operations are completed on each street. e e e I.. I (VARIES) (VARIES) 27'-6" TO 4"-0" 22'-6" TO 36'-0" "I 2'-6" (TYP.) 2' 0" (MIN.) PROPOSED CHIP SEAL OVERLA Y EXISTING HMAC PAVEMENT (DEPTH VAREIS) EXISTING CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER TYPICAL STREET SECTION NOT TO SCALE NOTES: SINGLE COURSE CHIP SEAL (K-E-F ITEM 4.5.22, TxDOT ITEM 320) · CAT AL YTlCALL Y -BLOWN ASPHALT JOINT AND CRACK SEALER (OR APPROVED EQUA~ S~ALL BE APPLIED AT RA TE=0.002 GAL ~. Y. APPROXIMA TEL Y) (K-E-F ITEM 4.5.19, TxDOT I MOO) · ASPHALT SHALL BE AC-5 AT RESIDENTIAL RATE OF 0.25 GAL/S.Y. (K-E-F ITEM 4.5.19, TXDOT ITEM 300) · AGGREGATE SHALL BE PB-GRADE 5 APPLIED AT RATE OF 1 C.Y./135 S.Y. (K-E-F ITEM 4.5.21, TxDOT ITEM 304) CHIP SEAL PAVEMENT SECTION DETAIL N(i)RTH RICHLAND HILLS 3-10-94 FIGURE XX CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 4/11/94 TraffIC LIght Synchromzation III Program - Subject: Resolution No. 94-13 Agenda Number: PW 94-11 The Traffic Light Synchronization III (TLS) program is one of several department programs approved by the Governor's Office as part of the "Oil Overcharge Restitutionary Act" which creates an oil overcharge account in the State Treasury for use in funding competitive grant programs. This program will provide money to cities across the state to be used to optimize traffic signal timing plans and for the installation or replacement of equipment necessary for the implementation of signal systems. Typically, this equipment will include controllers, cabinets, loop detectors, interconnect cable and microcomputer equipment for intersection monitoring. These funds will assist traffic engineers in reducing unnecessary vehicle stops and delays through more efficient traffic signal timing, resulting in significant fuel savings and reduction in vehicle emissions. Up to 75% of the project costs are eligible for reimbursement. If a project is funded, the local government (cities) must provide a minimum 25% of the total direct cost of the project in matching funds and/or in kind services. Staff is currently working on three (3) grant applications. The first application is to synchronize the existing seven (7) signals on FM 1938 (Davis Boulevard) from Maplewood Avenue to Starnes/Rumfield Road. The second application is to synchronize the existing four (4) signals on Holiday Lane from Loop 820 to Industrial Park Boulevard. The last application is to re-tune the existing synchronization on Rure Snow Drive from Lewis Drive to Starnes Road. Staff will bring proposed budgets to Council in the future if the grants are approved by the State. The budgets as proposed in the grant applications are noted below: Proposed State Proposed City Total Proposed Participation Particioation Proiect Funding 1. FM 1938 $11,378.62 $2,781. 90 $14,160.52 (Maplewood to Starnes Rd.) 2. Holiday Lane 11,707.57 $3,878.90 $15,586.47 (Loop 820 to Industrial Blvd.) 3. Rure Snow Drive 13,502.50 $4,695.20 $18,197.70 (Lewis to Starnes) $36.588.69 $11.356.00 $47.944.69 Funds are currently available in Unspecified Street Fund Balance to finance the estimated $11,356 City participation required in this program. Recommendation: It is recommended Council approve Resolution No. 94-13 and authorize the Mayor to sign on their behalf. Finance Review Finance Director Page 1 of . . . RESOLUTION NO. 94-13 WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, recognizes that it is in the interest of the national economy to promote the conservation of energy resources and to reduce our nation's dependence on costly foreign oil; and WHEREAS, the traffic management projects proposed by the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, will provide benefits to the local community in the form of improved traffic flow, reduced fuel consumption, reduced vehicle operating costs, reduced air pollutant emissions, and improved safety due to smoother traffic flow; and WHEREAS, funds have been established and are available through the Texas Department of Transportation for grants to local governments for traffic signal retiming projects; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council authorizes the submission of applications to the Texas Department of Transportation for a Traffic Light Synchronization III grants and, if the applications are selected for funding, the Mayor of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas all necessary applications, contracts, and agreements to implement and carry out the purposes specified in this resolution. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 11th day of April, 1994. APPROVED: Mayor Tommy Brown ATIEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City . . . ~ I Not to SCale . Signalized intersection XX.XXX-Average Datty Traffic Barton-Aschman Assoc Inc 8178773214 1""' . .",¿ 9tame. Rd. Rumfleld Rd. Man 61. 8 CIa .... ~aJd ""1Ie W ·Y '0 .. CIa .... Lola Dr. ò ~ H.-rwood Dr. 8j ~18t ~ 1-- q ::; Olii~ ..- o¡SC'it ~ 0 Ma I.wood Dr. ~ ATTACHMENT B-2 SIGNAL IDENTIFICATION MAP . . ~ I Not to Seal. . Slgnal~ed intersection . XX,XXX-AverBge Dally Traffic Bat" 1;. or,-Asc.h man Assac. I nc. :::; 1 (:::; ( (6:¿ 1 q ~ ~~ ~ ~ \Þ.....", ~ o ... Lola Dr. ... '8tò w~ 8 ~. .:,.. .. r-.t:.I..::. ATTACHMENT B-2 SIGNAL IDENTtFICA TION MAP J::iar'l;.l~t-I-H:::''-IIIIIu.rl .....-=>=-'-'''-. .11- __. _. . "--- . Stame. Rd. io G C') C'f Hlohtow.r Dr. - ìo ... ID N Chapman Dr. .: Q. . :~r Ìð 10 8 N ~~ fI CD .!.~ ! N :I a: W.tauga Ad. ~IO ~ r- .. Stardust Dr. e 10 to) .- industrial Park Blvd. .. 10 to. , .... w ~ I Lewle Ln. Not to Scale ;:t ~IØ - . ICD ...('1) . Signalized Interaectlon XX,XXX-Average Dally Traffic ATTACHMENT 8-2 SIGNAL IDENTIFICATION MAP I . I I. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 1 in the Subject: Amount of $47,260 ~~ to Trnc-Work, Tnc for Rufe Snow Drive Railroad Crossing Reconstruction Council Meeting Date: 4/11/94 Agenda Number: PAY 94-05 This project was awarded by Council on February 28, 1994 (PW 94-07) for $46,081.35 to Trac-Work Inc. Final payment to the Contractor will make his total earnings on the project $47,260.35. The Contractor has earned $1, 179.00 over the contract amount. The additional cost is due to staff requesting the Contractor work 24 hours a day with 2 crews on the second half of the repair work. This additional cost was below what the Contractor projected, when asked to expedite the project completion. The Contractor has totally completed the project within the bid time. Fundine Source: Initial funding for construction was rounded off to $47,000 in Council action on February 28, 1994 (PW 94-07). The additional $260.35 needed to cover the final payment can be appropriated as shown below: From: Unspecified Streets CIP fund Balance $261. 00 To: Rufe Snow Railroad Crossing (13-23-12-6000) $261. 00 Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council approve final payment to Trac-Work, Inc. in the amount of $47,260.35 and authorize the transfer of funds as shown above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Finance Director ignature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of APR- 7-94 THU 17:44 KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS p.el · · BV: · Estimate No.: 1 Job No.: 3-200 DI1I: File No: tdHOO.WK3 Cal Daya: Project Deacrlption: RECONSTRUCTION OF RUFE SNOW' DRIVE RAILROAD CROSSING W.O. Date: ScI'I.du&ed completla'l Da18: For Materials Furnished and Labor Perfofmed in Period Ending: Time Charged Thru Period (Cays): Contractor: Owner: Place: TRAC-WORK. INC. CITY OF NORTH FUCHLAND HI u..S NORTH RlCHLANO HILLS NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION , . Barricades, Signs & Traffic Handling 2 . Rem. PanelslRail8(Tles & MI5C. Rail Access. 3 . Relay New TIes. RailS & Misc. Rail Asse8&. 4 . Saw Cuts 5 . MC-3Q Of MS-2 Prime Coat 6 . tFRS-2 or $8-' Tack Coat 7 . Type'O" HMAC for Misc. Uses 8 . Concrete Grade Crossing Panels 9 . MisC. Construction Allowance iOTAL BASE BID: Field VerifICation 01 Job Conditions and Confirmation of Pay Quantities Da18: Total Eamings Qncl. Retain.): TIme Charged ThN This Period: PAGE 1 OF 1 CONTRACTOR'S ESTiMATE 4/7 /94 21 21-Uar-94 11-Apr-94 3/31/94 PREVIOUS THIS TOTAL UNIT UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT LS. 0.00 1 1 $2,846.00 $ 2,845.00 LS. 0.00 1 1 9,130.00 9,730.00 LS. 0.00 1 1 8,478.00 8,478.00 L.F. 0.00 ]17 172 2.34 403.00 -- S.Y. 0.00 16.5 16.5 1.07 17.68 S.Y. 0.00 246.7 ?4h.7 0.12 28.67 S.Y. 0.00 197.4 , q7 4 28.75 5,675.00 LS. 0.00 1 , 13,904.00 11.904.00 LS. 0.00 --L.-2..1L- ] .? ~n 6,000.00 6.179.00 $47.?hO.35 Submitted: TRAC-WORK, INC. DD: 04-07-94 Total. . . . . . . . . . . Leas Percent ("-) Rataßed. . . . Ditførence. . . . . . . Plus (%) MatertalS on Hand. . . . Total. . . . . LeSS PreviOUs Payments. . . . Difference Due !hIS Esti'nate. . (Note~ Pay Last Amount ShoM'I) Bid: $46,081.35 Ti"ne: 21 $47.260.35 10% 47.260.35 100% -- 47.260.3.5. 0.00 $47,260.35 Percent: Percent: 0<VÐ7/94 . R A l R o A o E N G ~ 1."'; A .:" ì""'-'" >---. "- I N a ~ o N S "1_ ~ I~~"j"'¡ U ". .1 C .~ ___.._ 'II. I T -- ~. I o N M A fA N T , E ¡ N .. \_ A .__ - N C E . ErmiS. TX (214) 875-2232 Amerino, TX 1808) 383-2S91 13:131 'ft81733896ø4 TRAC-WORK INC. f4I Ø03 7 ,.~c -Wo,.~, /IVC. ."I!A Of' I CI! 1966 Dalga Ft. Worth, Texðl5 76102 Phonø (817) 338-9677 Metro (817) 654-9010 FAX (811) 338-9604 April 7. 1994 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ¡30l N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The fOllowing items were added in the miscellaneous construction allowances: ITEM'I: A 6" compacted subgrade with filter fabric to contain the ballast was installed along the entire crossing. A 4" drain pipe wrapped in filter fabric was installed on both sides of the track for the entire length of the crossing (a total of 180') to 81 low drainage. T01'AL COST OF ITEM .1: J.h.186.00 IT~M .2: upon request by Mr. Greg Dickens, to be able to open the crossing 2 days early to help the serious traffic congestion we were asked to work around the clock to speed the project up. There were additional costs due to special safety vest and overtime pay and receiving materials after hours. TOTAL COST OF ITEM 12: .I1..t..s 9 ~ . 00 This brings the total of line item t9 to ~79.0~ Bringing the new contract total to $47.260.35. Sincerely, bWOLNC. Jimmy Sims Area Manager JS:csm cc: Office file CORPORATE OFFICE: Eoois, Texas (214) 87S«i85 Houston. TX San Antonio, TX Schrttver. I.A Shrt\lepon. LA 8roken Arrow. OK L:nlll ~Ck. Aft Saratanll. AL MempnlS, TN (713) 681.œ116 (210) 333-3714 (504) 447-7091 .3181222-2735 19181 2S1~'œ (501) 513&-4144 (205) 87i-<JœS (!KJ1 942-0212 [1-ii.-....... . .....-- .... Mm.......... A__", 11f. ....-. ...... 'SENT BY: 4- 4-34 4:46PM ;CITY OF N.RICH.HILLS~ 8173383604;# 2/ 2 ';"- ,.., ....~.~ ': (-..."" ~ t " ~' -- ',' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS ,. . .......:/' · THE STATE OF TEXAS I 'i.-{fH TX COUNTY OF TARRANT I CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT OF FINAL PAYMENT AND RELEASE · BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared JIMMY SIMS ("Affiant"), who after beinq by me duly Bworn, deposes and says that he is AREA MANAGER a TRAC WORK. INC. ( corporation, partnership, trade name) of TARRANT COunty, State of Texas (the "Contractor"), which said Contractor was awarded the contract dated the 4th day of March , 19 94 , for the construction of Railroad Crossing (the "Work ") ~ a .tot~! d·' thir.EY-£l.ve nts consideration of Forty-seven thousand two hundre & Sl.xt. . ar~r to Þe pa to the said Contractor (the "Contract II), and that Affiant has full power of authority to make this affidavit. That the City of North Richland Hills (the "OWnerlf) has approved the final estimate on said Work, and that the said Contractor has fully satisfied and paid any and all claims that may be covered by Chapter 53 of' the Texas Property Code, and Article 5160 ot the Revised Civil Statutes of the State of Texas, or any other applicable statutes or charter p~ovisions, and that all just bills for labor and materials have been paid and discharged by said Contractor insofar as they pertain to the Work in question. That in addition to any funds which may have been previously paid by the OWner. the Contractor hereby accepts the amount of Forty-seven thousand two hundred and six~:v:;~d¡Hlars and 35 cents Dollars as FULL AND FINAL :PAYMEN'r unde~ the aforementioned Contract, and he~eby waive. and releases any right Affiant and/or the Contractor may have to pursue claims of any nature against the Owner arising out of or in any manner connected with the performance of the Work and/or the Contract. including but not limited to claims of third parties that supplied material and/prlabor for the Work for or through the contractor ("Subcontractors"), as well as claims for delay, additional compensation or for recovery of liquidated damages which may have been withheld by the Owner. The Contractor shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Owner from any such claims of such Subcontractors. IIIec * *~ This a!fldav1t 18 g1ven pursuant to the final payment provision. of the Contract, and shall not be deemed to alter or modify the term. and provisions of said Contract. *This release shall not apply to any claim or liability arising from the sole negligence of the owner. * TRAC-WORK"'~ BY L· Affiant' JIMMY SIMS. AREA MANAGER Printed Name L s ME, this the 5th day of March ,A.D.19~ ~J.ALAiJ1 Notary Public, State of Texas · M Notary's Printed Name: 03-13-97 CATHERINE S. MARTELL , TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS T APP DEVELOPMENT North Richland Hills, Texas Prepared for: The City of North Richland Hills Prepared by: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Dallas-Ft. Worth, Texas December 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Purpose Study Procedure 1 1 1 AREA CONDITIONS Area Roadway System Existing Traffic Volumes 4 4 4 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND PROPOSED TRAFFIC Trip Generation Direction Distribution of Site Traffic Site Traffic Assignment Total Projected Traffic 6 6 7 7 7 ALTERNATIVE IMPROVEMENTS ANALYSIS Site Observations Intersection Control Alternatives Traffic Signal Coordination Operations Analysis 11 11 11 16 16 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 LIST OF TABLES Trip Generation Operations Analysis 6 17 LIST OF FIGURES Site Location Existing Traffic Volumes Direction Distribution ot Site Traffic Traffic Generated by New Development Projected Peak Hour Total Traffic Alternative 1 - Rute Snow and Tapp Entrance Alternative 2 - Rute Snow and Tapp Entrance Alternative 3 - Rute Snow and Tapp Entrance Alternative 4 - Rute Snow and Tapp Entrance 2 5 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 ii 1 . Introduction A new retail development, Tapp Development, is proposed for the site located in the northwest corner of IH 820 and Rufe Snow Drive in North Richland Hills, Texas. The proposed retail center will contain approximately 432,550 square feet (SF) of gross leasable area (GLA). The site location is shown in Figure 1. The services of Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. has been retained by the City of North Richland Hills to prepare this traffic impact analysis for the proposed development. PURPOSE With Rufe Snow Drive currently operating at or near capacity during peak hour periods, the additional demand generated by the proposed development could potentially further deteriorate traffic operations causing unacceptable conditions, especially at the Rufe Snow Drive access points. The purpose of this study is to assess the traffic impact of the proposed development upon the intersection of Rufe Snow Drive and the proposed Tapp Development entrance located just north of IH 820. The study intersection will be referred to as the intersection of Rufe Snow and Tapp Entrance throughout the report. The study will also identify necessary measures or alternatives to mitigate any anticipated adverse impacts resulting from the development. The key impact areas included in the analysis are roadway capacity and site access. Consideration has been given to the patterns, magnitude, origin, and destination of traffic generated by the proposed development. This report presents the procedures, findings, and conclusions of the analysis of the traffic implications resulting from the proposed development. STUDY PROCEDURE In order to make a thorough evaluation of the proposed development with respect to impacts on the study intersection, the following tasks were undertaken: 1. A discussion was held with City staff to fully understand the development proposal and to formulate study objectives. 2. A field survey of the site was made to examine the physical and operational aspects of the existing roadway network. 3. Existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes were obtained from current area studies and supplemented with additional driveway counts. 1 ~ I Not to Scale LEGEND C -TAPP Development . - Study Intersection b· ~,-4 ~... ~.. ~~ .~ ,~b~ .: o J o c o . - ~ a: Lewis Dr. Dor Coombs Rd. - - .::J []C I.H. 820 WB Front. e Rd. FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION N. Richland Hills, Texas 2 ~ 4. The expected number of site generated trips were estimated for the proposed development. 5. The directional distribution of site-generated vehicle-trips (both inbound and outbound) were estimated. 6. Traffic volumes that would be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the study intersection. 7. Intersection control alternatives and improvements were developed for the study intersection. 8. This report presents the findings and conclusions of this study. 3 . .. Q ~ g (/) A.M. PEAK HOUR - . 0 - ~ ... a: 100 ... ... ~~ McDonald'. Drwy. '-26 ~6 (Future) tr T APP Entrance ,...~ (') co ~ .: I Q Not to Scale ~ g (/) . P.M. PEAK HOUR - 0 ~ ,... a: 0 ...,... t~ McDonald'. Drwy. '-25 ,4 (Future) tr TAPP Entrance ,...... co... co ... FIGURE 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES 5 ~ 2. Area Conditions The major factors which will influence the accessibility of the site are the efficiency of the roadway system serving the proposed development and the geographic location of the proposed development with respect to other areas of activity. The efficiency of the roadway system is a function of travel time, convenience, directional distribution of traffic, and available capacity on the street utilized in traveling to and from the development. This chapter provides a brief discussion of the area characteristics, including a description of the area roadway system and existing traffic volumes. AREA ROADWAY SYSTEM There are several area roadways or proposed roadways that will provide access to the proposed development. Direct access to the site will be provided by Rufe Snow Drive and the IH 820 westbound Frontage Road. The proposed extension of Industrial Park Boulevard will provide access to the site via Boulder Drive and will also help in relieving traffic congestion at other major access points. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes were obtained from current area traffic studies. Additional driveway turning movement counts were collected by Barton-Aschman at the study location during peak periods. The existing peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. 4 3. Site Characteristics and Proposed Traffic The factors which affect the amount of site-generated traffic and its distribution on the area roadway system are discussed in this chapter. TRIP GENERATION The traffic expected to be generated by a parcel of land is primarily a function of the use of that land. The intensity at which traffic arrives and departs any site varies for differing uses and development densities. To determine the expected trip generation of the proposed Tapp Development, a nationally recognized and accepted standard published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE) entitled Trip Generation, 5th Edition was used. This publication provides trip generation rates and equations for varied land uses based upon actual survey data. Trip generation data for land uses 820-Shopping Center, 890-Furniture Store, and 8 31-Quality Restaurant were used for the proposed development, based upon potential land uses provided by the City of North Richland Hills. The trip generation rates and the land use densities for the development were then used to determine the volumes of traffic generated by the proposed development. Table 1 indicates the number of trips that can be expected during the AM and PM peak hours and on a daily basis. TABLE 1 - TRIP GENERATION Trips Generated Gross Floor AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Area Land Use (SF) In Out In Out Daily Shopping Center 377.350 224 131 765 765 26,208 Furniture Store 40.800 1 1 7 12 220 Restaurant 1 4,400 12 2 77 33 1,262 TOT ALS 432.5500 237 134 849 810 17,690 6 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE TRAFFIC The directions from which traffic will approach and depart the site is a function of numerous variables. Some of these variables include the size and type of the land use, location of residential population, available roadway system, travel time to and from the site, and the level of congestion along area roadways. Based on these variables, the directional distribution of the site traffic has been estimated. The resulting directions of approach are shown in Figure 3. SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Based on the directional distribution, the traffic expected to be generated by the Tapp Development was assigned to the study intersection for subsequent analysis. It was assumed that 40% of the site generated traffic would utilize the study intersection. The results of the assignment are shown in Figure 4. TOTAL PROJECTED TRAFFIC The total projected traffic conditions at the intersection of Rufe Snow Drive and Tapp Entrance will be the sum of the site-generated traffic and the existing background or non-site traffic passing the site. The percentage of pass-by trips was estimated to be 20% for the AM peak and 30% for the PM peak based upon data presented by ITE for retail establishments. Pass-by trips are trips made to the site as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination. Pass-by trips are attracted from traffic passing the site on an adjacent street that contains direct access to the generator, such as Rufe Snow Drive to the Tapp Development. The total projected traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5. 7 ~ I Not to Scale LEGEND C -TAPP Development . - Study Intersection b· <b'~ ~.\.... 1\~ !'.( b'>'b ,~ °O[ Coombs Rd. ". .::J CC .. I.H. 820 WB Fronta e Rd. I.H. 820 EB Frontage Rd. t39$ . .. c . o c CI) . - =' a: Lewis Dr. ~ '18$ FIGURE 3 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE TRAFFIC 8 ~ .; c ~ 0 c Ø) . A.M. PEAK HOUR - ::s a: .... ('I) ) McDonald'. Drwy. 21~ (Future) 33, TAPP Entrance ~ co 10 N . .. I c Not to Seal. ~ 8 ø .. P.M. PEAK HOUR - ::s ('I) a: ('I) ... ) McDonald'. Drwy. 128~ (Future) 198~ T APP Entrance ~ .... 0 C\I FIGURE 4 TRAFFIC GENERA TED BY NEW DEVELOPMENT 9 ~ ..: c ~ 0 c en A.M. PEAK HOUR CI) N - :J 0 a: ....100 (11)...... )~~ McDonald'. Drwy. ~26 ;-6 21.Jf 33~ T APP Entrance ~t( COlON ION CI) ~ ~ ..: I c Not to Scale ~ g en CI) P.M. PEAK HOUR - 0 :J (11)(11) a: (11)0 .......... )~~ McDonald'. Drwy. '-25 ,--4 128 -#' 198 """" T APP Entrance ~t( ....10... ON... NCI) ... FIGURE 5 PROJECTED PEAK HOUR TOTAL TRAFFIC 10 ~ 4. Alternative Improvements Analysis SITE OBSERVATIONS Site observations made during peak traffic flow periods confirmed the congestion and operational problems that exist on Rufe Snow Drive near the proposed entrance to the Tapp Development. The most critical problems appeared to occur during the PM peak hour when traffic is heavy on Rufe Snow Drive in both directions. Although traffic conditions are critical during the AM peak hour, the traffic flow is more directional (southbound). INTERSECTION CONTROL ALTERNATIVES Based on the site layout, field observation, and projected traffic condition the following intersection control alternatives were developed for the intersection of Rufe Snow Drive and the Tapp Development entrance: Alternative 1 - This alternative uses the eXisting intersection geometrics and requires that the existing traffic signal installation be put into operation. Alternative 1 is shown in Figure 6. Alternative 2 - Alternative 2 limits the traffic signal to a 2-phase operation by utilizing intersection channelization (concrete islands) to prohibit left turns from Rufe Snow Drive and also left turns from the entrance to McDonald's. Alternative 2 is shown in Figure 7. Alternative 3 - This alternative provides additional capacity for the northbound and eastbound left turn movements. Alternative 3 would also require the existing traffic signal installation be put into operation. Three (3) of the four (4) traffic signal poles would have to be relocated to comply with the proposed geometrics. Alternative 3 is shown in Figure 8. Alternative 4 - This alternative proposes a median closure at the Rufe Snow Driverrapp Entrance intersection and the removal of the traffic signal installation. Alternative 4 is illustrated in Figure 9. 11 I I (@ . CD ... Q) ~ w ... U t: a:: w (1 J ::) >.. <:I - ë . I I ü: ~ w i zo.. a: 0.. w< 1-1- .;. <'g a:I ~ 0 t: U) Q) N 'S P- I I a: I I I I .0 't (\j C o C () ~ I I I I I I t ~ ~ oC [:;: Ii! I I I eoU.JIU¡ dd'U. ~ ~ ~ c ~ 1:1 I I I b@ . .... (II Q) ~ w ... g a: w 111 ¡ ::;) >'" CJ -ë '" I I ¡¡ ~ w . <Q. i zQ. 0:< ~~ ..J'O < C I I 111 ~ Q c en CD (') '5 .. I I 0: ~ I I I I I I I .0 :Q CO c o c (,) ~ I I I I I f,~i I I j i I = .! i .. . ... .. ~ /// i _ c=f:: I I ~ ~) I I . -! ø . l i I I I I I I I I I I \.. i\ 110 C') CD b'QJ w ... () !š w ~ 52 ::: E u.. I- W «0. Zo. a:« ~I- ëi!-g ." ~ o c U) C 'S a: ;t ..t .. .. : \ IÒIÓ(\~~: -'" "C -æ I I. ( c 0 C . (J c .! ::E c J I I .!. :! .. ~ ... Ü 2 . I I g C) I I I I I I t ~ I I :1, N Ii: I I I .. .J;' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I fJ I I ~ i ØI "" Q) w ... g I !5 w ~ CI >- _ - c: <I) I I ... I- W . <Q. I ZQ. a:< ~I- ..J"O < C I I III ~ 0 C en Q) 10 'S ... I I a: I I I, c: . .. o ,I/) "0 (ij c: o Q (J :! I I I I I I Other Considerations - Other alternatives were evaluated but were deemed unacceptable control measures for the projected conditions or were not compatible with the site layout of the proposed development. One control strategy considered to be unacceptable would be to remove the existing traffic signal installation without closing the median opening. This alternative would not provide adequate traffic control for the traffic expected to utilize the intersection to access the proposed development in terms of safety and operations. Another alternative that was explored included using Tapp Entrance in combination with Coombs Road, such as a one-way pair to accommodate the projected traffic. This alternative would require signalization at both intersections and this would be undesirable due to the impact the additional signals would have on the Rufe Snow signal system. Relocating the Tapp entrance was also considered as an alternative. The entrance could be relocated and aligned with the driveway to the north that currently serves the shopping center (Wal-Mart) east of Rufe Snow Drive. This would allow traffic signalization to serve both the existing and proposed shopping centers and would also improve intersection spacing. TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION Several of the intersection control alternatives previously discussed requires traffic signalization at the study intersection. If any of these alternatives are implemented, it is essential that the study intersection be incorporated into the "closed-Ioop"signal system currently proposed for Rufe Snow Drive. The coordinated signal system control would lessen_ the negative impacts the Rufe Snow DrivefTapp Entrance intersection would have on the arterial system. It would also be desirable to provide coordination for the IH 820 interchange signals. OPERATIONS ANALYSIS An operations analysis was performed for Alternatives 1,2,3, and 4 using the traffic analysis computer programs, TRANSYT-7F and PASSER 11-90. Each alternative was evaluated for the PM peak hour using the projected total traffic volumes. The study location was incorporated into the PASSER II model developed for the Rufe Snow Drive "closed-loop" signal system project. The signalized intersections at the IH 820 interchange were also included in the analysis model to determine what impacts could be expected from the interchange signals. Table 2 presents the results of the analysis for the study intersection. 16 TABLE 2 OPERATIONS ANALYSIS NB LT Average Total Fuel Minimum Delay Stops Consumption AL TERNA TIVE Storage (ft.) (sec/veh) (veh-hr) (gal/hr) Alternative 1 200 ft. 14.40 1,508 32.60 Alternative 2 N/A 7.08 1,106 24.57 Alternative 3 100 ft. 12.33 1,363 30.15 Alternative 4 N/A 0.56 223 12.61 One important element that is presented by the analysis is the minimum amount of left-turn storage that is required for the northbound left turn for each alternative. The minimum storage requirements shown are based on uniform arrivals and does not consider traffic surges. Also, the left turn demand could be higher than what is projected. The average delay shown is the delay that is experienced at the Rufe Snow Driverrapp Entrance intersection due to the type of intersection control proposed and projected traffic conditions. What is not reflected, is the amount of delay that could be experienced due to traffic backing through the intersection from an adjacent signalized intersection. The operations analysis confirmed the need for traffic signal coordination between the study location and adjacent intersections due to intersection spacing and the magnitude of arterial traffic. The analysis indicated that progression could be achieved with bandwidths in the range of 25-35 seconds for each direction. This is based on the PM peak period using a 120 second cycle length. Of the four (4) alternatives, Alternatives 2 and 4 provide the best solution in terms of system and intersection operations. These alternatives provide the least intersection delay and would be more efficient in terms of signal system coordination. Alternative 1 is unacceptable due to the deficient left turn storage and it appears that the left turn lane cannot be extended to the required length due to the limited space between the study intersection and the westbound frontage road at IH 820. Also, because of the closeness of the study intersection to the westbound frontage road, an adequate transition cannot be achieved to construct the dual left turn lane shown in Alternative 3. The cost of constructing the additional capacity for Alternative 3 is another factor that has to be considered. 17 ; . 5. Conclusions and Recommendations This study assessed the traffic impact that the proposed development, Tapp Development, would have upon the intersection of Rufe Snow Drive and Tapp Entrance located just north of IH 820 on Rufe Snow Drive. Although the projected volumes for this intersection generated by the proposed development are not extremely high, they are of a magnitude that would have an adverse affect on the operations of Rufe Snow Drive. This is due to the fact that Rufe Snow Drive currently operates at or near capacity during peak hour periods. Several intersection control alternatives were identified and evaluated to mitigate the adverse impacts resulting from traffic generated by the proposed development. Based on the study findings, Alternatives 2 and 4 provide the better solutions in terms of safety and operations. Alternative 2 limits the traffic signal to a 2-phase operation by utilizing intersection channelization (concrete islands) to prohibit left turns from Rufe Snow Drive and also left turns from the entrance to McDonald's. Alternative 4 closes the median at the intersection and removes the traffic signal installation. Alternative 4 is the preferred alterative in terms of traffic operations and is recommended for implementation. The disadvantage of Alternative 4 is that it is the most restrictive in terms of providing access to and from the proposed development. If it is determined by the City that Alternative 4 cannot be implemented, Alternative 2 should be the second choice and is considered a workable solution. Alternatives 1 and 3 were determined to be unacceptable. Since Alternative 2 requires traffic signalization, if implemented, it is essential that this alternative be incorporated into the "closed-loop" signal system planned for Rufe Snow Drive. As a minimum, the signals at the IH 820 interchange should be time-based coordinated with the Rufe Snow Drive system. It would be desirable to have the IH 820 interchange on-line with the "closed-loop" system to facilitate signal timing changes and to monitor signal operations. don\tapp.dev 18 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS RUFE SNOW /820 VALUE CENTER IH-820 AT RUFE SNOW DRIVE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Prepared for: Rufe Snow/Loop 820, A Texas General Partnership c/o Peskind Development Prepared by: DeShazo, Tang & Associates, Inc. 330 Union Station Dallas, TX 75202 (214) 748-6740 February 1994 DT&A Job # 93154 I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Executive Summary The purpose of this report was to examine the existing traffic conditions of Rufe Snow Drive near and adjacent to the 820 Value Shopping Center and develop transportation engineering recommendations as it relates to Rufe Snow Drive between Meadow Lakes Drive and Lewis Drive. This examination was initiated after several city council members expressed concern about traffic accidents and congestion on Rufe Snow Drive to the North Richland Hill's City Manager's office. Specifically, the traffic signal serving the 820 Value Center jTapp and Rufe Snow Drive intersection was carefully examined. This signalized intersection was activated in August, 1993. The signal was previously approved by the Director of Public Works and was funded by Peskind Development in 1985. After the signal was activated a number of reported accidents occurred. While this reaction is normal when new signals are installed, a more detailed study was performed. The results of that study indicated that several changes have been made to the traffic signal phasing in regards to the level of protection for left turning movements and signal coordination. These changes by the City of North Richland Hills have reduced the accident rate to 1.5 accidents per month during the last three months of 1993 as compared to more than 13 accidents in a one month period after initial activation. The accident problem appears to be resolved with the most recently implemented signal modifications. The second and related issue associated with this study addressed the potential to install a raised median on Rufe Snow Drive from IH-820 to Lewis Drive in order to further reduce accidents and increase the roadway capacity. The construction of a median barrier will encourage V-turn movements which may be more hazardous than existing turning movements. Several engineering observations were performed and traffic volumes were obtained for Rufe Snow Drive north of IH-820. Traffic volumes of 38,000 vehicles per day were found on Rufe Snow Drive, a five-lane undivided principal arterial roadway. Congestion occurs throughout the day and is especially critical in the PM peak . hour. Large numbers of vehicles travel southbound and wish to turn left onto the eastbound frontage road of IH-820. A corresponding heavy westbound to northbound movement also exists during this same time period. The existing demand coupled with the lack of an adequate number of lanes on the Rufe Snow Drive bridge which crosses IH-820 causes the interchange intersections to operate at unacceptable Levels-of-Service F. The traffic congestion on Rufe Snow Drive is directly related to the bridge structure and the signalization of the IH-820 frontage roads rather than the turning movements proposed to be eliminated by the median barrier. The existing signal at 820 Value CenterjTapp is currently doubled cycled along with Meadow Lakes Drive for every cycle of the IH-820 interchange. The 820 Value CenterjTapp traffic signal operates in such a manner that it does not create additional congestion on Rufe Snow Drive. Engineering observations indicate this signal operates with minimal delay for the southbound movements and only slight delays for northbound travel on Rufe Snow Drive. It is recommended that it remain in operation until improvements to the IH-820 bridge are implemented or traffic conditions change requiring a re-evaluation of the traffic signal operations. Other recommendations are provided which concentrate on increasing the effective numbers of lanes on the existing IH-820 bridge at Rufe Snow Drive and intercepting the eastbound traffic demand via Industrial Park Boulevard and re-directing them to the IH-820 eastbound ramp located west of Rufe Snow Drive. Policy options for City Council consideration are provided that would request existing programmed funds by TxDOT ($4.2M) to be re-directed to IH-820 bridge improvements rather than be used to widen Rufe Snow Drive from four lanes to six lanes. These funds are projected to be sufficient to improve the IH-820 bridge. Considering the Rufe Snow Drive corridor, widening the bridge structure would be ranked as the most cost effective project to increase capacity and enhance traffic flow in the area. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS ANALYSIS RUFE SNOW /820 VALUE CENTER IH 820 AT RUFE SNOW DRIVE North Richland Hills, Texas J93154.0 BACKGROUND The City of North Richland Hills has an estimated population of 47,250 people and is located in the north central section of the DallasjFort Worth Metropolitan area. Tremendous area growth during the last few years has resulted in very congested peak traffic conditions, especially on Rufe Snow Drive near IH-820. Rufe Snow Drivej820 Value Center has recently become occupied by several major tenants. These tenants include Wal- Mart, Home Depot, Sack N Save, Sears Homelife, Fort Worth Sports, Chick-Fil-A, Applebee's and Don Pablo's. All of these developments represent..±.405,OOO square feet of gross leasable space within the northwest quadrant of Rufe Snow Drive and the westbound IH-820 frontage road. As part of this recent development activity, a traffic signal located on Rufe Snow Drive north of the westbound frontage road was activated in the summer of 1993. The developer of the 820 Value Center funded this signal installation in 1985 as part of an agreement with the City of North Richland Hills Public Works Director. Since activation of the traffic signal at the 820 Value Center jTapp intersection with Rufe Snow Drive, a number of reported accidents occurred at this location. Concern was raised by citizens of North Richland Hills which was reflected in the City Council Members' request for alternatives to improve safety and reduce traffic congestion on Rufe Snow Drive. The City Manager's Office corresponded with the business interests of the area and asked them to attend a meeting to discuss the potential ofremoving the existing 820 Value CenterjTapp traffic signal and installing a raised concrete median on Rufe Snow Drive between IH-820 and Lewis Drive. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2 PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to respond to the City Manager's and Council's concern over the existing traffic operating conditions found on Rufe Snow Drive near and adjacent to the 820 Value Center. This study examined the existing conditions and identified the primary cause of congestion on Rufe Snow Drive near IH-820. Included was the evaluation of the accident history of the traffic signal at the intersection of the 820 Value Center jTapp at Rufe Snow Drive and the review of access control alternatives considered by the Manager's office. This study also examined additional recommendations to improve traffic operations on Rufe Snow Drive north of IH-820. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA The study area is shown in Exhibit 1. This study area is bounded by Meadow Lakes Drive, Industrial Park Boulevard and Rufe Snow Drive. The area of special concentration includes that section of Rufe Snow Drive between Meadow Lakes Drive and Lewis Drive. North of the 820 Value CenterjTapp intersection with Rufe Snow Drive, Rufe Snow Drive is currently a five-lane, undivided roadway section which provides a continuous two-way left-turn lane. A raised concrete median exists between IH-820 and the 820 Value CenterjTapp intersection. The 820 Value Center development constructed Boulder Drive from IH-820 westbound frontage road to Industrial Park Boulevard. The recent extension of Industrial Park Boulevard to IH-820 provides a network of collector roadways which has substantially increased accessibility and convenience to the 820 Value Center and the area's roadway network. The Rufe Snow DrivejIH-820 interchange is classified as a traditional diamond-type facility with a westbound one-way frontage road on IH-820. Rufe Snow Drive provides four travel lanes, two northbound and two southbound, across IH-820. I I I I I I il I I I I I I I II I I I I @ N.T.S. LEGEND: ~ am VALlE ŒHTER . SIGNAUZED INTERSECT10N .; C . o c (I) .. - ::I a: Browning Hilltop Rufe Snow Drive Study Area ~~~~~~~~~ :~{ Combs Rd. ::::::: :::::: Corona Q~' ~e#b ". ~o~ ~e~ EXHIBIT 1 LOCATION MAP Trinidad Buenos Aries Meadow Crest Lewis Dr. Loop 820 Corona Karen Marilyn II I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1\ 4 PREVIOUS STUDIES AND ANALYSIS City staff of North Richland Hills successfully secured a Traffic Management Program Grant administered by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). The purpose of this program was to reduce vehicle stops and delays, save fuel and reduce vehicle emissions by providing funding assistance to the City to re-time traffic signals. A "closed-loop" traffic signal system was installed for seven signalized intersections along Rufe Snow Drive from Starnes Road to Lewis Drive. This system provided a means of coordinating traffic flow with the ability to monitor and respond to changes in the traffic stream on a real-time basis. A study conducted after implementing the signal system indicated the project had a benefit/cost ratio of 3.53 to 1. These benefits consisted of reduction in vehicle hours of delay, gallons of fuel and reduction in vehicle stops. The "closed-loop" system did not include the 820 Value Center signal, the two frontage roads at IH-820, or Meadow Lakes Drive. A traffic impact analysis for the Tapp Development was prepared for the City of North Richland Hills by Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. in December of 1991. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the specific traffic impact of the proposed development upon the intersection of Rufe Snow Drive and the proposed 820 Value Center /Tapp development entrance located just north of IH-820. The following alternatives were identified and evaluated for the intersection of Rufe Snow Drive and 820 Value Center/Tapp: Alternative 1 - This alternative uses the existing intersection geometry and requires that the existing traffic signal installation be put into operation. Alternative 2 - Alternative 2 limits the traffic signal to a two-phase operation by utilizing channelization (concrete islands) to prohibit left turns from Rufe Snow Drive and also left turns from the entrance to McDonald's. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5 Alternative 3 - This alternative provides additional capacity for the northbound and eastbound left- turn movements by creating dual left-turn lanes. It also requires that the existing traffic signal installation be put into operation. Alternative 4 - This alternative proposes a median closure at the intersection of the 820 Value Center jTapp at Rufe Snow Drive and the removal of the traffic signal installation. The following table summarizes the operational analysis of each of the alternatives: Operational Analysis Summary Alternative NB Left Average Total Fuel Min. Delay Stops Consumption Storage (Sec./Veh.) (Veh./Hour) (Gal.jHour) Alt. #1 200 ft. 14.40 1,508 32.60 Alt. #2 N/A 7.08 1,106 24.57 Alt. #3 100 ft. 12.33 1,363 30.15 Alt. #4 N/A 0.56 223 12.61 The operation analysis summary of these four alternatives indicated that all of the alternatives would provide acceptable Level-of-Service operations based on avera~e vehicle delay values. The last alternative, which closes the median and removes the signal, obviously has the lowest average delay and the least number of total stops. City staff considered this analysis by Barton-Aschman and felt that Alternative 1 (i.e., activate the 820 Value CenterjTapp and Rufe Snow Drive traffic signal installation) was a viable option among the alternatives considered and authorized it being placed into service on August 12, 1993. Since that time, several changes have been made to the traffic signal controller. Exhibit 2 identifies the chronology of the 820 Value Center/Tapp traffic signal and the specific modifications which have been implemented. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6 EXHIBIT 2 18-820 Value CenterjTapp Development Traffic Signal Chronology o 1985, traffic signal installation and funding provided by Peskind Development and authorized by Gene Riddle, Public Works Director. o Traffic signal heads flashed until early 1990 and then traffic signal heads were bagged. o December 1991, Barton-Aschman evaluates four alternatives: + Activate signal with existing geometry. + Construct channelized median which would only permit northbound movements from 820 Value Center, northbound vehicles could not access 820 Value Center from Rufe Snow Drive at this location. + Widen intersection to provide dual left turns for northbound and eastbound approaches to the intersection. + Extend and widen the existing median which would eliminate all access to 820 Value Center for northbound Rufe Snow Drive vehicles and remove traffic signal. o Traffic signal heads were un-bagged in February, 1993 and placed in flashing operation. o August 12, 1993, the traffic signal was activated and was tied to existing Rufe Snow Drive "closed loop" signal system from Lewis Drive to Starnes Road. o Initial signal operations provided "protected", (left turn on green arrow), followed by "permitted" signal indications for left-turning vehicles on Rufe Snow Drive, (left-turning drivers required to yield the right of way before making a left turn, with the driver viewing a solid green ball). o September 23, 1993, responding to citizen complaints and the number of reported accidents, the left-turn traffic signal indications were converted to "protected only" modes of operation, (i.e. left turn on green arrow only). o September 23, 1993 the signal timing was modified to double cycle the intersection signal and Meadows Lake Drive for each cycle at the IH-820 interchange. The intersection signal was removed from the Rufe Snow Drive "closed loop" signal system. The 820 Value Center/Tapp, IH -820, and Meadow Lakes Drive intersections were tied together to provide a coordinated signal system. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING ELEMENTS In examining the conditions of the IH-820jRufe Snow Drive study area, a transportation engineer must consider the safe. convenient and efficient movement of persons and goods. These three key elements of transportation engineering are contradictory. One could make an intersection or roadway very safe by lowering the speed limit to 5 mph, but it would not be very convenient or efficient. Prohibiting all turning movements at an intersection would generally be safer and efficient for the majority of drivers, however, it would be very inconvenient to drivers who wished to turn. No one element of these three goals is more important than the others. All three must be considered in developing solutions which are consistent with acceptable transportation engineering principals and practices. One also needs to recognize the relationships that exist between access control and roadway capacity in an urban area. Complete access control is used for the majority of freeways in the metroplex. The freeways therefore can carry relatively high volumes of traffic at high speeds. In urban areas, however, principal arterials such as Rufe Snow Drive provide access to adjacent land uses and traffic signals are often part of the roadway system to control traffic movements. While the installation of a raised median has some positive influence in enhancing roadway capacity, its total influence is relatively small. Roadways with medians compared to roadways without medians may see a .±.5-10% increase in peak hour capacity. Increasing the number of travel lanes at critical signalized intersections may provide an improvement in capacity which may range from 50%-200% increase. There is a need to strike a balance between the two issues considering the type of roadway and its function. Rufe Snow Drive also provides local access and service to retail-type developments which often are dependant upon the magnitude of traffic volume for their subsistence. The existing two-way left -turn lane south of Lewis Drive provides a physical separation between north- and southbound movements on Rufe Snow Drive functioning as a non-raised median. This type of configuration provides enhanced traffic capacity without the restricted nature of a raised median. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDmONS Traffic volume data has been compiled from previous studies and new data was collected as part of this study. Data collected on January 11, 1994 and compiled by DT&A indicates the total 24-hour volume on Rufe Snow Drive to be 38,519 vehicles per day just north of IH-820. Exhibit 3 indicates the recorded traffic volumes and depicts a graphic which indicates the volume for northbound and southbound traffic by ÛIDe of day. Exhibit 4 illustrates the turning movement volumes at IH-820/Rufe Snow Drive during the peak periods of the day Turning movement volumes indicate a heavy movement to the south and east during the AM peak hour. During the AM peak hour 852 vehicles were recorded making the left turn from southbound Rufe Snow Drive to the IH-820 eastbound frontage road. During the PM peak hour, the majority of movement was to the north and east. Six hundred thirty-six vehicles turned left from the IH-820 eastbound frontage road onto northbound Rufe Snow Drive. On the westbound frontage road, 804 vehicles turned right to head north on Rufe Snow Drive. For southbound traffic on Rufe Snow Drive, at least 681 vehicles attempted to turn left onto the eastbound frontage road in the evening. This movement stayed consistently high throughout the day. Traffic operations of Rufe Snow Drive were also observed during several site visits. Meetings were held with City staff and TxDOT personnel concerning existing traffic signal operations and prior traffic signal timing plans. Exhibit 5 shows the current cycle lengths for the signal system on Rufe Snow Drive between Meadow Lakes Drive and 820 Value Center/Tapp. A critical lane Level-of-Service (LOS) analysis performed indicates the IH- 820 interchange with Rufe Snow Drive operates at "LOS F' during the peak traffic periods. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXHIBIT 3 I Automated Traffic Count DeShazo, Tang & Associates, Inc. \ Rule Snow Drive 2.8 ~ -..., Street: :L. ^ 7 \ Location: North of 1- 820 :0.4 \ ,/ \ 2.2 / " I City/State: North Richland Hills, Tx .. / J 93154 - 522B II ,.- . '" \. Project-ION: ,.. January 11, 1994 11\ ~ "'- \ Date: '.4 1 \. .... ../ \ Tuesday ,-" t '\ ......- '- -"""'. \ Day of Week: , / ...... " 0.- / 'J 0.. "- ) ,. ~ D.,. SuppIi«J by City of Nottb RicbúDd Hill. 0.4 !::,." II I 0.2 0 I I ....,., 200 .00 &00 &00 '000 '200 '.00 ,&00 '&00 aooo """" """" 24-Hour Total: 38,519 " -- + "T"',,_ ef Day . ToW V.hlcl_ _d ......."..... .-...... "".... .-. ....... ..... .. ... .... ".. ..,. ...."..". . .... ......--......". ---.... .... --... ...., ._,'-- ...........-... Tun~ "Péåk}" ·····,····.Nòfthbô\Uìd'··· ,·'····,··,·,·····SOuthOO1JIld.···'·.············ Time ·'·péåk ·.··..U>..Nôrth1>01JIld>""·,,·,',·,··· , '·soûffibôùôa> 2400 1200 15 81 83 1215 320 348 30 58 49 1230 351 310 45 55 58 1245 308 1.294 308 100 47 219 38 204 1300 2,558 289 1,266 328 1,290 115 34 38 1315 261 297 130 41 34 1330 291 318 145 29 21 1345 250 298 200 19 123 20 113 1400 298 1,100 276 1,187 215 28 13 1415 289 279 230 28 24 1430 315 291 245 18 19 1445 314 288 300 22 92 18 72 1500 331 1,249 282 1,140 315 15 16 1515 340 287 330 18 24 1530 358 309 345 23 12 1545 353 306 400 22 76 30 82 1800 330 1.381 312 1,214 415 16 24 1615 390 295 1.222 430 12 33 1630 402 275 445 16 41 1645 380 281 500 24 68 46 144 1700 370 1,542 274 1.125 515 18 64 1715 413 276 530 19 96 1730 443 288 545 35 165 1745 459 224 600 52 124 159 484 1800 446 1.761 246 1.034 815 70 211 1815 2.813 422 1,770 285 1.043 830 107 276 1830 384 311 845 160 300 1845 382 294 700 199 536 351 1.138 1900 345 1.533 290 1,180 715 135 394 1915 314 286 730 171 448 1930 278 222 745 261 448 1945 246 225 800 253 820 408 1.696 2000 257 1.093 209 942 815 2.848 223 908 438 1.740 2015 204 207 830 177 914 308 2030 243 209 845 214 284 2045 208 192 900 214 828 254 1.284 2100 223 878 161 789 915 223 268 2115 215 174 930 208 241 2130 196 151 945 205 241 2145 166 126 1000 232 868 221 969 2200 147 724 128 577 1015 174 238 2215 144 128 1030 207 240 2230 120 114 1045 209 257 2245 115 103 1100 239 829 273 1,008 2300 104 483 72 417 1115 281 261 2315 96 103 1130 283 289 2330 88 65 1145 304 282 2345 88 75 1200 317 1.185 240 1,072 2400 81 351 48 291 Totals 19.107 19.412 I I 38,519 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I AM PEAK HOUR (7:15-8:15) ~;i~l --~ J! lL! _ 574 j '-= fI/lr1 548 _ ,- 152 178 .-/ -- 1167 2ØD. 838 _ I! ir l~~[1 ~;i~l -413 !52 - ,- 741 I~ir NOON PEAK HOUR (11:15-12:15) --~ J ~ 1 L! j~587 JJll1 .-/ -- SIØO '184 - l~¡[ PM PEAK HOUR (18:45-17:45) ~;i~l --~J! lL! -SJB j'-=-- Ø87 - ,- 881 361 .-/ -- 818 I ~ ir m1)¡( EXHIBIT 4 TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES FOR . RUFE SNOW DRIVE / IH 820 INTERCHANGE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXHIBIT 5 Current Signal Operations for Rufe Snow Drive between Meadow Lakes Drive and 820 Value Centerrrapp North Richland Hills, Texas f:\lotus\93154e <............J¥g¡n,..«....... 05:30 09:00 15:00 19:00 22:00 09:00 15:00 19:00 22:00 05:30 'I'~<.........pYcl~~gij\ ~iPti<m /($~)i······ AM 140 Off Peak 120 PM 140 Off Peak 120 Free N/A · operates 7 days/week I !I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 12 TxDOT SCHEDULE IMPROVEMENTS As part of the new Intermodal Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), TxDOT has identified and programmed some $4.3 million to increase the number of through-lanes on Rufe Snow Drive from four lanes to six lanes from IH-820 to Watauga Road. Engineering funding ($475,000) for this project is programmed for implementation in the current 1994 fiscal year. Contained in the Appendix are the 1994 TxDOT Transportation Improvement Programs (TIP) for the flScal years 1994 and 1995. TRAFFIC CONGESTION The traffic signals along Rufe Snow Drive control the amount and quality of traffic flow along the roadway. Providing traffic signal coordination between signalized intersections is cost -effective and has been demonstrated to enhance traffic movement. The signalized intersections north of and including Lewis Drive on Rufe Snow Drive are part of a "closed-loop" traffic signal system which provides traffic movement coordination. The 820 Value CenterjTapp intersection, the two IH-820 frontage roads and Meadow Lakes Drive are not part of that coordinated traffic signal system because of the physical constraints of the existing bridge and related timing needed to accommodate the traffic demand. Efficient traffic signal coordination to provide progression on Rufe Snow Drive through the IH-820 interchange does not appear feasible without widening of the bridge. With the existing conditions. traffic on Rufe Snow Drive will continue to Queue at the IH-820 interchange. Signal timing cannot accommodate the traffic demand. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS A major effort of this study was to review the accident history of Rufe Snow Drive between Meadow Lakes Drive and Lewis Drive. This section includes the 820 Value CenterjTapp signalized intersection. The North Richland Hills Police Department provided a computerized listing of accident numbers which occurred on the subject I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I 13 segment of Rufe Snow Drive for the years 1992 and 1993. DT&A examined each of these reported accidents and classified them by location and type. These accidents were further classified noting them as being related to an intersection activity and/or a mid-block location. A listing of the selected accidents are contained in the Appendix. A total of 322 accidents were reported along Rufe Snow Drive between Meadow Lakes Drive and Lewis Drive during the two years studied. Exhibit 6 summarizes the number of accidents reported in 1992 and 1993 by location. Exhibits 7 and 8 represent a collision diagram summary which shows the number of reported accidents according to location and type. A total of 153 accidents were reported in 1992 while 169 accidents were reported in 1993. Of particular interest in this study is the number of accidents reported at the intersection of Rufe Snow Drive and 820 Value Center/Tapp. EXHIBIT 6 Rufe Snow Drive Accident Summary North Richland Hills January 1,1992 - December 31, 1993 f: \lotus\93154c Reported Accidents on Rufe Snow Drive Street Street Number of Accidents Name Number 1992 1993 Total South of Meadow Lakes Drive 0.5 0 1 1 Meadow Lakes Drive 1 4 1 5 Between Meadow Lakes Dr & æ 820 1.5 6 10 16 æ 820 EB Frontage Rd 2 35 23 58 Between EB & WB Frontage Rd 2.5 0 0 0 æ 820 WB Frontage Rd 3 7 9 16 Between æ 820 & Tapp 3.5 20 19 39 ·82°\'al\lê'..perHetJTâþ¡:fÎ>e-vólöpffi&l1t .. Hi ... .................... :3 ...................'?'....... ....,.,.-.._.,"........,.-,..-"._.,-...,..,'.....',......-.,'.',...-......... ,...,.,.... ,','. ........ Between Tapp & Combs Rd 4.5 15 9 24 Combs Road 5 0 7 7 Between Combs Rd & Lewis Dr 5.5 21 21 42 Lewis Drive 6 33 12 45 North of Lewis Drive 6.5 9 12 21 Total 153 169 322 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7t t ~ ..:~ , Lewis Dr. t:- 17 t1 13 t . ... Q ~ 3 ~ 0 c en Rd. CD Combs - et == D: ( (" @ 820 Value Center I Tapp t 1 WB Frontage Rd. IH-820 ~ 28 j EB Frontege Rd. "1 ACCIDENT TYPE NOTE: Løcatlon between Intersections are mld'~block accidents -.J 1. sideswipe y- ..J 2. left turn collision EXHIBIT 7 Number of Accidents Reported In 1992 According to Type and Location Along Rufe Snow Drive Meadow Lakes Dr. 3. rear-end collision .., .. 4. right angle collision .-J 5. out of control ~ Combs Rd. 3t 43\ Ht ) WB Frontage Rd. 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 12 t 5 3 -3_\ t \ 14 820 Value Center I Tapp IH-820 ~ " J EB Frontage Rd. ~ . ... Q . o c en CD - = a: t:- & t t 1 1 .-J M.edow Lek.. Dr. EXHIBIT 8 Number of Accidents Reported In 1993 According to Type and Location Along Rufe Snow Drive Lewis Dr. r 3 t 4 t , 2 @ ACCIDENT TYPE NOTE: location between Intersections are mld..block accidents 1. sideswipe 2. left turn collision 3. rear-end collision 4. right angle collision 5. out of control y- -J .., .. -.J ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 16 On August 12, 1993 the traffic signal at Rufe Snow Drive and 820 Value Center jTapp was activated. This signal was interconnected and coordinated with seven other signalized intersections from Lewis Drive to Starnes Road in a "closed-loop" signal system. This system was not coordinated with the IH-820 interchange signals even though the 820 Value CenterjTapp signal is separated by less than 450 feet. This lack of coordination with the IH-820 interchange may be a causative factor in explaining the frequency of accidents at 820 Value CenterjTapp. The signal provided for protected and permitted left-turn phasing from Rufe Snow Drive. Prior to the activation of the signal in 1993, a total of 26 reported accidents were recorded during an 8.5-month period, representing an accident rate of 3.55 accidents per month. On September 17, 1993 the left-turn signal phasing was converted to allow left turns only during the display of a protected left-turn green arrow. There were thirteen reported accidents which occurred prior to this change in a 30 day period of time. On September 23, 1993, the subject traffic signal was removed from the "closed-loop" system and tied in with Meadow Lakes Drive and IH-820 interchange signals. The signal at 820 Value CenterjTapp was also double- cycled along with Meadow Lakes Drive for each cycle which occurred at IH-820. Since September 23, when the latest changes were implemented by the City of North Richland Hills, only five accidents have been reported at the 820 Value Center/Tapp intersection in the last three months of the year. The change in traffic operations strategy initiated by the City has been effective in minimizing the number of accidents at the subject intersection. Exhibit 9 summarizes the number of accidents that occurred at this intersection. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ = - en fI} «") oW = ~ Ø)5æ~~ ~:g-g~~ - g è: ~ «") £D<:ao~ _ "' U fI} _>·_"jI.8 ... .¡:: P'ò N ..9 W><o'€~;:¡:: ~ 0 - oZ-"' J5 ~ ~ § ~ ] 5 S g. ~ 8: Q t ... B 5 u .å Q > ° N 00 1 .~ ... o ~ g en ~ ~ fI} ~ :3 ~ .g :! ::s .s .~ Q) - U >. >. U ell) B :š .S "0 = j~.g c.. ~ .~ 1 0 S ... B c.. fI} .~ .9 ~ 1 ru 8 ~ fI} '€ o E 0 ... .8 = ~.::: S ].£,g .~ 11 U Q) > Q >SO - § ! u e .. I I fI}«")«") I~~ «") -- ~~ff'Í - N ~.8.8 ... S S ~!B :lQ)g. <en en .¡ .0 Ó ~111")1I")00r-N Q) o~"'!~~"'! :g::s°«")SII")- u u ... < 8- ~r<')\or<')-II") ...... N- o -8 '-= 'û ~ ... Q 23 .8 'û u < ] ... ! N r<')r<')r<') ~~~~~ .. --- .. .. .. _ \oN_ Or<')_"'-Nr<') E- ... - ... ... ... ~i~~~ Q) = B B Q) ~<rÎrÎ~ B Q o r<') r<') Nr<')~~~ ~~O\-- ...-4 ...-I......... .. .. S ~ ~ ~~ ~ O--N ... ...-4 ... 1004 ~ ~~i~~ §§Qí)SS fãfã<=!! .... .... Q) Q) en en ~ 00 ::r: - aê:I ~ '€ .¡:: 00 CI fI} Q) ] ..9:3 ~ ~ -." ! :! . üJ ::s .9 .9 11 '.0:1 '.0:1 .¡ Ó I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 18 The installation of a new traffic signal on an arterial will almost always show an increase in the number of accidents "immediately after" its installation. The frequency increases while the kinds and types of accidents change. Signals generally eliminate right-angle and serious injury accidents, yet rear-end and damage-only accidents are generally expected to increase. Once the City activated the 820 Value CenterjTapp signal, several changes and modifications were attempted by the City to improve traffic flow and to respond to the number of reported accidents at this location. The City's process to modify the operation has been successful in eliminating the relatively high frequency of reported accidents at this location. The last three months reflect the significant improvement over the initial trial installation. It should also be noted that the accident rate in the last three months of 1993 has been reduced by a factor of 7.2 as compared to the accident rate immediatelv after the signal was activated. One would anticipate a continuation of this performance for 1994. TRAFFIC CONGESTION Movement of traffic on Rufe Snow Drive is dependent upon the most constrained or critical signalized intersection on the roadway. The constraints associated with movement on an arterial roadway could be considered similar to uncompressed fluids within a fixed container. As an example, one could measure the amount of sand that could flow through a ten-foot long stove pipe within an hour. This would represent the traffic flow without signalization on the arterial. As signals are installed on the arterial, the stove pipe's diameter is correspondingly reduced; cutting the pipe's capacity by forty to sixty percent--much like an hourglass is constructed to limit the flow of sand. The intersection which provides the least arterial green time becomes the critical intersection of the arterial. On Rufe Snow Drive, the IH-82O interchange is the most restrictive intersection in regards to sipal timing. This restriction regulates the volume of traffic in the peak traffic hours on Rufe Snow Drive. Modifications to the median or signal timing adjustments to the other intersections on Rufe Snow Drive will not significantly "improve traffic operations" or "increase capacity" of Rufe Snow Drive. Improvements to the IH- I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 19 820/Rufe Snow Drive interchange bridge, on the other hand, will effectively increase the capacity of the interchange and improve the flow of traffic on Rufe Snow Drive. This improvement will enhance both north- south and east-west movements at the interchange. IH-820/RUFE SNOW DRIVE BRIDGE The width of the IH-820 bridge at Rufe Snow Drive is 48 feet, curb face to curb face. A sidewalk/safety refuge area of approximately 5.5 feet exists on both sides of the bridge. Four twelve-foot wide lanes are provided on the bridge; two for each direction. The northbound lanes are permanently designated by signs and pavement markings with the inside lane noted as a combination through/left-turn lane and the outside lane as a through lane. The southbound lanes, however, are controlled by two changeable message signs. During southbound through movements on Rufe Snow Drive, the inside lane is designated for left-turns only and drivers in the outside lane can turn left or proceed straight. This signing strategy attempts to accommodate the heavy southbound to eastbound left-turn movement by allowing left turns from two lanes. During the westbound frontage road phase of the traffic signal controller when traffic is turning from the frontage road onto southbound Rufe Snow Drive, the southbound lanes on the bridge are designated as a shared left/through lane for the inside lane and a through-only lane for the outside lane. This method of operation enhances the roadway carrying capacity of Rufe Snow Drive with a slight decrease in traffic safety. The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is in the initial planning phases of e,r::tmining the potential to widen IH-820 to accommodate 4-5 lanes of travel for each direction. This process has been initiated, however, the scheduling of any improvement is uncertain at the current time. There is no funding currently identified to improve the Rufe Snow Drive bridge structure across IH-820 other than the construction associated with the total IH -820 widening. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 20 The potential to develop an alternative strategy related to the IH-82O bridge was investigated. The removal of approximately 3.5 feet of sidewalk area on each side of the existing bridge appears to be feasible. This action would allow five ll-foot wide lanes on the existing bridge. These lanes could be striped in at least three different configurations which would align with the existing lane assignments at the bridge approaches. These three lane assignments are shown in Exhibit 10. A Level-of-Service analysis using Passer III software indicates that Alternative A would provide the highest Level-of-Service of the three alternatives. Preliminary costs to perform the suggested modifications are projected to be in the range of $150,000-$250,000. A Level-of-Service summary of the existing conditions and these three alternatives is noted in Exhibit 13. - I ~ I Rufe Snow Drive I - ~ ~ - - I æ ~ 4) ~ & ~ E :I: ~ c: I ;; Æ - Æ ffi Alternative A ~ I I ~ I Rufe Snow Drive I .ç ~ - I - ~ ~ ~ 4) ~ & I E :I: ~ c: ;; Æ - Æ ffi ARematlve B ~ I I I ~ Rufe Snow Drive I 40"'"' ~ I - - ~ ~ IÞ ~ 4) ~ , I E ;; c: ;; Æ Æ ffi ARematlve C ~ I EXHIBIT 10 CONCEPTUAL LANE ASSIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES I FOR IH 820 BRIDGE AT RUFE SNOW DRIVE Remove 3.5' of Sidewalk on Each Side of Bridge & Re-strlpe for Five 11' Lanes ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 22 CONCEPTUAL LANE GEOMETRY FOR IH-820 BRIDGE A conceptual bridge plan has also been prepared to accommodate the projected demand at IH-820 and Rufe Snow Drive. This concept sketch is shown in Exhibit 11 and will be referred to as Alternate D. It includes a total of eight travel lanes on the main bridge structure and two Texas V-turn bridges for both frontage roads. Because TxDOT has recently decided to incorporated retaining wall type sections in their new construction to minimize right-of-way acquisition, it is possible to construct a bridge similar to that shown in Exhibit 12 using two 100-foot spans prior to the currently planned re-construction of IH-820. This configuration would generally coincide with the existing location of the frontage roads and would also allow TxDOT to provide for five through- lanes in each direction on IH-820 in the future. The proposed bridge would also eliminate the changing lane assignments for southbound movements which will minimize the relatively high number of improper lane-change type accidents at the interchange. Exhibit 13 summarizes the anticipated Levels-of-Service for the IH-820 interchange comparing existing conditions to increasing the number of lanes of the existing bridge to reconstruction. The City of North Richland Hills may wish to consider submitting a formal request to TxDOT asking that currently programmed funds to widen Rufe Snow Drive from four lanes to six lanes north of IH-820 be re- directed toward the re-construction of the IH-820jRufe Snow Drive bridge. This would represent the most cost- effective way to eliminate the current "bottleneck" on Rufe Snow Drive. Spending funds to widen Rufe Snow Drive to six lanes will not be as cost effective as improving the IH-820jRufe Snow Drive bridge. I UB tttt I I c a: \ I w CJ I ~ z 0 a: LL I c ~U z ::) 0 m I I- Cf) « 0 w C'I CO I I ::I: - 0 ~ (II Q) 0 I ~ Z « Z::IE @ c :3~ I c \ GI a: .~ c." - ..JZ w ca CJ c «- .... ::)t- I ~ GI - t-~ z Ci c.X 0 ww a: LL Ow I c Zt- z 0« :J 00 0 >0 m I I- .... 0:::IE Cf) .... «::IE w 3: ttt f- 2:0 - ::IE 0 HH Htt m _0 I X trl « ~ >< 0:0 W c. t- I ~r'+~ ~ ~ I "to - - - - - RUFE SNOW DRIVE - - I - - - - ~ .ç ~ $ t I .:I' ... ... ... - ... - - - ... ... - C- ~~4t. I i - I (I HH I tttt Òn I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ! & .a s æ 6 oð at ¡r,j - ~'tJ ï; § _ 0 ari ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~. \\ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II) .. ~ - - ~ N co ... ... It) ..¡. t; < w CJ z 52 o 9 o N co = Nu. "'0 !::z æO :E: ¡::: >< 0 w ~ U) U) o a: o c w U) o Q. o a: Q. ª ,. _ _ _ _J c: § 8 î .. ;H ª _1 -, -~ Q II ~. 1/ .!!g./I arili5# ~/ /I II II I ~ \I) II ... CI ~ III H¥---- ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Existing Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C Alternative D EXHIBIT 13 Level of Service for Different Lane Geometries on Rufe Snow North Richland Hills, Texas f:\lotus\93154b .·..··.Nó,..()f........ '¥ii~~ .~~~g 4470 4470 4470 4470 4283 ^~ . ..........-.... Pit~y< .......... ......... ..."......... ""H ....~.......)........ ...... ...".. ".-.,. ······...··.·.·..s.ec·..··.·.··.·................ . . .... .",. .' ....... . " ,..--- ,....... 79.62 53.97 56.61 78.91 44.96 s~ ··.·..·~mý...·..·.··. .".."...---...... ............,........ ......~.......)......... .........................$eC......................................... .. '. ,",. ...... .., ..... .- ,.. ...."... 61.25 41.51 43.55 60.7 34.58 F E E F D I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 26 18-820 EASTBOUND TRAILBLAZING The City has installed information-type signs for southbound Rufe Snow Drive traffic north of Industrial Park Boulevard advising motorists that they can access IH-820 East by turning right on Industrial Park Boulevard. Exhibit 14 illustrates the message and location of the three signs. The installation of this signing is an excellent example of managing traffic demand by re-directing it to a location that will reduce congestion on Rufe Snow Drive at IH-820. This exhibit also indicates recommended changes. It is recommended that conventional interstate shields with appropriate legends be used to trailblaze the route. Traffic which seeks to utilize this alternative means to gain access to IH-820 East is removed from the heavy, southbound to eastbound movement at the IH-820 bridge. It would appear that a significant time savings would be enjoyed by persons who chose to use this alternative route. The City may wish to publicize this alternative route through traditional media means they may have at their disposal. I @ I N.T.S. I I Bueno. Arle. I Me.dow Crest Hilltop I Lewil Dr. I Loop 820 I Corona Corona I Karen Morllyn I LOCATION EXISTING SIGNING RECOMMENDED SIGNING I Q) Loop 820 lID EAST Q)øm TURN RIGHT 100' S of RR I Next Intersection e I I N"~~ I I ø Loop 820 ID lID EAST At Industrial ø ømøøm TURN RIGHT .. I ee I = CI ø Trucks ID I ø E/B Loop 820 Use At Carllae 0" Industrial Park Blvd ø. I D EXHIBIT 14 I ALTERNATE ROUTE TRAILBLAZING PLAN FOR IH 820 EAST I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 28 OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS The changeable lane assignment signs used for southbound lane assignments at the IH-820 bridge are effective, however, the number of reported accidents prompted a closer examination of this operation. A total of 28 and 18 southbound accidents were noted respectively for 1992 and 1993 at the eastbound frontage road of IH-820 and Rufe Snow Drive which can be related to the variable lane assignment utilized to enhance traffic operations. It was observed that the two current signs utilize a series of single-point fiber-optic type displays to represent the permitted turning movements by lane. While the displays can be comprehended by vehicle drivers, it would appear that alternative means to increase the signs conspicuousness or "target value" would be desirable. New available technology now provides the potential for much brighter messages to be displayed. Signs are on the market which utilize light emitting diodes (LED's) which provide an array of lights depicting arrow indications with the word "only" displayed. These signs are much brighter and more easily seen by drivers. Exhibits 15a and 1Sh illustrates the existing and recommended sign display. A single sign is recommended to replace the two existing signs to reduce the observed accident frequency associated with the variable turning movement lane assignments. I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I · · ... ... . . . . - . . . . . . · . . . . · · . . · . . · . · · - · · · · ...... · · .. . . · · · . . · . . · · . . . · · . . · · . . · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · - · · SOUTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND LEFT LANE RIGHT LANE DEFAULT OR NORMAL STATE EXISTING CONDITIONS - . .. . . . . . . . . . . · . . · .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . - · · · · · · ..... -. ..... . . . .. . . . · . . · · · . · . · · · · · · · · · · · SOUTHBOUND LEFT LANE SOUTHBOUND RIGHT LANE ACTIVATED STATE EXISTING CONDITIONS I I EXHIBIT 15a EXISTING SIGNING FOR SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES ON RUFE SNOW DRIVE AT THE IH 820 EASTBOUND FRONTAGE ROAD I I I . ... · ... . . ...... -.. ..-. ..-:.. .. .......:. . .'... . . : .. . .. .. . .,........ '.' . . . .e ...... . _.1 . . "... . : .. ... .' '. . .' . . .1.. . .... . e.. . ...... .. . .. ... . ,... . ". .. · '. . . ..... · ... . · I... .... . I I I I I . -.. ..... . ...... ...... ,- ......... -'-'... :..' .... . .... . ... ., I.. " I"' . ..... -,. .. .., . . ..... ,oe' . ..... ... .. ... .. .., ., .- " '" " ..... ..... -., . . I DEFAULT OR NORMAL STATE 36"X36· SINGLE SIGN MOUNTED ABOVE LANE LIN~ . ... -.... ....... e. . .e . . . . .. . . . .e. : .... ,e .- . . .,- .......:..' .e '.' . . . ~ ..1 . . ., . . .' ..'. ..... . ~'.' ",: ..... ." . .1 II ..... ., ... ,I ..... . ... .'..... " ...... . ....... . .1 .... . .,-.. ....... ., - . . · " . . ..... ..... .... . · ., . . · .... .., ., I I I . . . I. .. . . .-'.. ..~.;.... .·.·fII:... ...... .- .,." ,,_.1· ,'. . '.. .1, " '.' ..' .. ." . . ... ,. ..... . .. ., ..... · .. .. I I I ONLY ACTIVATED STATE I I EXHIBIT 15b RECOMMENDED SIGN TYPE FOR SOUTHBOUND VEHICLES ON RUFE SNOW DRIVE AT THE IH 820 EASTBOUND FRONTAGE ROAD I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I POLICY OPTIONS 31 Exhibit 16 has been prepared which identifies four policy options associated with this study. The options include: Option I - Option n - Option ill - Option IV - Maintain existing signalization and geometry at 820 Value Center/Tapp. Construct a raised median barrier on Rufe Snow Drive from IH-820 to Lewis Drive and eliminate traffic signalization of 820 Value Center/Tapp. Pursue investigation and implementation to remove seven feet of sidewalk on the IH- 820 bridge and re-stripe to improve traffic operations on Rufe Snow Drive. Reconstruct the IH-820 bridge at Rufe Snow Drive. Also, examine the potential of re- directing TxDOT funds currently programmed for widening Rufe Snow Drive from four to six lanes to the bridge's reconstruction. The advantages and disadvantages of each of these options are also identified. The Council may wish to further explore these options with their staff and take appropriate action. I I I I 32 EXHIBIT 16 Policy Options for Access Control of Rufe Snow Drive Between IH-820 and Lewis Drive I Option I - Maintain existing signalization and geometry at 820 Value Center/Tapp Advantages I I I I I I Option II - I I I I I I I I Least costly to city budget. · · Access is provide for all existing traffic movements. · Business interests will feel the city recognizes the need to balance development activities with reasonable measures to ensure traffic safety. Disadvantage · Potential Citizen perception that 820 Value Center jTapp signal is major cause of congestion. · Citizen may continue to "blame" the 820 Value CenterjTapp signal for traffic accidents. Construct a raised median barrier on Rufe Snow Drive IH-820 to Lewis Drive and eliminate traffic signalization at 820 Value CenterfTapp. Advantages · Vehicle conflicts are eliminated, therefore the number of turning movement related accidents are minimized. Disadvantages · Business interest will feel that the City is not responsive to their needs and investment in providing funding for the traffic signal installation. · Traffic from the 820 Value Center which wishes to return to the north on Rufe Snow Drive will have a more circuitous route which is not easily perceived by the vehicle drivers. · Traffic accidents and related congestion will not be eliminated. Redirected traffic demand may transfer the existing accident rate to other locations. · Significant expenditure of City funds with no significant increase in roadway capacity or reduction in accidents on Rufe Snow Drive. · V-turns on Rufe Snow Drive will increase causing potentially hazardous situations. I I Option III - I Advantages I · I 33 Remove sidewalks and re-stripe the 10-820 bridge at Rufe Snow Drive to improve traffic operations on Rufe Snow Drive. Improved Level-of-Service on bridge with minimal costs. · Potential short-term solution utilizing existing bridge structure. · Relatively low cost compared to bridge replacement. I Disadvantages I I I I Option IV - I I I I I' I I I I · Modifying existing structure will require detail structural analysis and engineering plans. · Will require approval from TxDOT. · TxDOT may not permit modification as a Department Policy. · Modifications will only improve current LOS F to E. · Reduced lane widths will negatively affect truck turning movements on the bridge. Reconstruct the 10-820 bridge at Rufe Snow Drive to accommodate existing and future traffic demand. Examine the potential of re-directing TxDOT funds currently programmed for widening Rufe Snow Drive from 4 to 6 lanes to the bridge reconstruction. Advantages · The roadway capacity of Rufe Snow Drive will be increased and the level of congestion will improve with associated improvement in travel time, reduction in delay and numbers of accidents. · It can be demonstrated that the level of congestion currently experienced on Rufe Snow Drive is the result of the undersized bridge, not the number of lanes on Rufe Snow Drive. The bridge and its related signal timing is the "bottleneck" of Rufe Snow Drive. · This potential improvement would have a greater benefit cost ratio than increasing the number of lanes on Rufe Snow Drive. · Existing traffic volumes and congestion are easily recognized as a "bottleneck" by citizens, Council, and transportation engineering community. · The budget estimate to construct the needed bridge structures<±-S2.5-S3.0 million) appears to be less than the currently funded Rufe Snow Drive widening from four to six lanes at a cost of $4.3 million. I I 34 Disadvantages I · The improvement must be coordinated with and funding approval obtained from TxDOT. I I I · TxDOT's plans to widen IH-820 over the next..±.. 10 years may be viewed as requiring the completion of those plans before serious consideration of constructing the bridge as a separate project. · The current plans to widen Rufe Snow Drive has received TxDOT approval to commence engineering this fiscal year and has been approved by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCfCOG) Regional Transportation Council. This would have to be revisited which will take time. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix I I I I I I I I I I I :·1 I I I I I I I >- A. o U I- ... ~ Q ~;"". ~ < a: G o a: 0... I- Z W ~ W > o a: 0... ~ Z o I- ~ za: 0° _0... GOO wZ a:< ma: ::>1- oo~ Zm a:~ wI- I-u. C/)< wa: ~CI C\ ~ - 0 g ØI I i ª Ë i ~ ¡ ! J! ~ ! ~ ØI ii5 ØI ;::: ØI :a~ ~ ~ :; I II :;; Æ :It r . CDØI >- II) i ¡ fi ª ¡ I 5 i ~ ~ ¡ ~ - ~ ~ ~ i ... J1ii ØI C -8 0 ! = ;r; Jo.. ØI~ - ~ w to) ~ ~ 1:1 . Ii: Iã 1:1 ;r; :I i Ii! 0 ¡ " ØI ¡;¡ 0 ØI - - 1:3 CD I!! Ii! ~ ; . . . . . . . . I II : :I I : :: :: :: :a :: :: :: :I :I f3 f3 f3 Ii! Ii! Ii! ~ .. .. .iUS . . o u Q:(/J c ( I ! I 0 ( ( ~ "ß. II: o .t:; ~ b1 ! ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ I .. CD ~ ! ~ ~ i ~ c .. . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. .. o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. N N N N N .. N N . .. .. .. N .. .. .. N . N . . N . .. N . . ! ¡3 I I i I ! ! I I ~ ~ Ii: i ¡ i i I i Ii ! i ~ I ~ ~ i I Ii: ' ~ I ; = E ~ = :I iii f3 ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡ : ~ a - ~ f i ! § ~ ~ Ii ¡ ~ ! ¡¡¡ :I C ¡ ~ :'J ~ d . ~ " ... :I ~ Ii ! w i i is ... ... .. ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ i .. t: I í Ii Z :: ~ to :I ~ ! .. i E I ! I i I § r ~ i > :I æ ! f ~ I - t: 2 ~ Ii: Ii i , ~ Ii: ~ ~ i !; oJ 6 ! Ii: : I 5 :! ! ~ . ~ ¡ ~ .. ¡¡¡ . !! ¡¡¡ . . !! ï w ¡¡¡ . i i ~ .. . to i r ~ :i' I ~ ~ Ii I ~ I CD ~ i i § ~ E Pi > Iii ~ ~ ~ a ~ ! ij Iii Ii ~ z Iii Iii I Pi Pi Iii Iii i d ~ ~ . i ~ 1:3 ; ; Pi Pi f ~ I i ~ .. 5 t¡ i I § I I I Iii Iii ~ ~ ~ ! .. to ~ ¡ .. I ~ Ii g ~ I ~ ~ I I ¡;¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ I .. f ! oJ ... ~ ð í i! ~ - :I ; i i i i ~ :I Ie ~ 0.. Q r :I ¡¡¡ ¡ i! !! z IE: t: '" æ g: ~ Iii ~ ~ ~ '" 6 i i ! ~ i ffi ~ ~ i ~ ~ ; ; ~ ~ I ~ ~ ; i It ~ ~ I i i ~ I I ! I ¡:: B I I I I ; ; ; I ! I I I ! I i ~ ~ ï ~ ; g g a i I ï ~ 0:: Z ~ w ... ~ " ~ > ... " " IL e ::! ~ i ~ i .. ffi :I <: '" 6 ~ i .. I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ; i ~ ~ ~ I ! i ~ ~ ~ g i ; i i ~ ~ .;; C i i i ¡ ! 8 w I ~ 8 ¡ iii iii ¡ 8 g w i g g i ! !2 ~ : ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ æ ~ ¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a ~ i ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ æ f " " L ~ lE 1:3 CD ; ! :I t¡ ! ~ Ð ã g ~ ~ ~ ¡ , ! ; ~ :I ª E! ã ~ ~ ! :; iii :I ::: .. .. ! m iii I § ! 0:: .9:1. 't) : r I:i ~ ¡;¡ r ~ ~ .. r r .. N I:i N :::¡ 0 0 (J)Q:o 4 ~ :s 5 Q ~ § .. 3; ~ ~ (.) ~ ~ (J) ~ "t .... ~ I¡J ~ 1::· ;: 9· ~¡.3 I I !I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .... o .... , ~ - .... t!) <: eo.. c .... ~ i - t- - a; ~ a:: t- ~ :II: i t- ~ ... 5 ..J<or ~~ ... .... . ;:; t-- ðffi "'f! !g C) f~ t-~ Z .... % .... > co CI: t = = - < .- ð eo.. VI i t- .... /)I /)I - t- V .... "") ~ I A- I . I , I , I , .... 1 ~g: : I: : '-'c, .... , ..". . = I ~~: CI:..... . <...... ....- , ......... 09:513 ;'" · · · 0.. , .cc · . ...... · ,~ I~ IW >- .1- C!: '" c.!IZS zeo ....u'" -' ......, C .I-C t-I:ICU 0....1-0 .-......",..... ~ on qo '1- i~~ ........ ~ w ,-, ... ... ~.c ..t-C :be~g · ...-a.. "'-' I , , , , , , r'I , :~ ,.... ,> , . I · , , , I · , , , · I ~ .....-' .< ..~c · ÞOOOlC(u t 0..,...= I ~~V)-' .1- ~i~ ... u a: , , I · , · C'\ I · t:1f. <. """" ¡ -' &.e.a-' "':~ci:¿~ .c:.h........Q II-w..""'..... '1- a:: VI i~~ ....u'" , , ... , .. .< '.... . >- , I · , I , · · · , , 1--' '-"'tI-J IC ·p-cC I ÞOO 1:1 C '-' 0........0 t- ... '" -' .t- Ig~ ........ ~,.... c.. I t-~ l:I,ce ...., t t-" ... I VI VI ..... '-';:; I-VI ....C).... ~:5¡ ........ ..J ~ ~2 ~ ......... . t- 2 5-t~ ~, æ¡:~5. a:~~~~~ '-'0.1'10.1'101:1 ....I-....k 3%~~~ ~::=e~ .......... >-'-' ....z zz........ :::::: ¡::5 ~t-... ! _c......., ~~aæ .......... - :". ~~::; .,.. -g..... . ~~~~~ , ........""0 I -~......c::c , .... '-' ..... a:: ... , 'ö'Lì"¡U3028 o II'> :5 ,- '...... I , VI I ... , a; , . ....,< :E . :E ..... 0' '-' : oOZ ,c..o "" - 0. I ..... ,;:; , .p- . VlC . I , I , on '" 'V' o '" I . , '0 ,.... , o ;:; i C ..... :!: U ~ i z t- ~ ....0 ",,~e; ........ :z ...J-oct - . :z: l- i ~ 1-.......1:1 !;:;o.. U/)lVl..... -....ctc:> . CI:.... X , « ........""""""'..... I- z: ';;11.... VI -= :01 , · /)I E:w ..... .- I · VI , .. .:;; ¡¡ · .... C .... ..... :z: .... 2 ~ :l I~ · ... '-' 0- , ... M.... :;:~ 01- · · 2: · , : è · a:: ¡~; · c.. I a: .~ ;:; .1- VIe t- .....- "'0 ....g:~ .........: ;:::1 :z: l- i t: t-~'V':S ~5g:,^(\" =~G~'7 4( ....&.&.1,... t-Z.ot-V1o , , .,...t"""IO :~X:e , .. I ...... . , <or II'> QI .... ... -~ - ""1- 8~ .- -..... 0- , <Þ ~~ "".... OCII: .... --« "'f ,;,~U'\. -ø"Z =~ ;:; l- i :;: ...~~~ &%01 ~~~~~ ~C:~:~ ,... ==~V1 t 0- ~~ . .... x XCTCOG TRAXSPORT .... 8 ~ o ,... Ii - < . 8 .... .. t- V - .. f :IE ... ~. ... 10")1 0 ~. VI I · · · · .."" O,Oal ... .- I- , V I .." ~ - 0."1 V r- - .0."1 '.... 'Z¡; 11 .v :i, · , IV I ~ ... 'VI I . · · · · ,....00 .0 .wo · · ...". ,~ .;z: :~ :~ ~ IV ~ .0 /)10. O\U'\ ....~ -~ P- 0l'I ~ c.. .... ... 8 ... .... '" ~ .... , C _ ..'" qo 8 ~ I- . ~:~ 0, CI: 0- % ... r- VI ~ VI ~ I: t I 'U .~ '. , VI . I 'VI , :; : .......c~ ¡~::E- O.VI ~ ..... . C· z. ~: i '" ~ ....:- !i! ¡ ~ ~~~ ~ :: ~ ~ I 5- =:.;& E 0 ~ r-~i .;e t- ~ ~ ¡:: ~~; ¡ ~ ~ :~æCl:~ìi: ~ ò~~ .Q;cg<=... i _=- :~ gc¡z ...,~~~ 'vi=;5~~ ..;u;!~;: .;..:iE; ...:..:¡¡~f ... ~ Ño .... .... u - .... 0- VI V I- CI: , is: .0 "" .- I , · · , ,< · . .6.. . VI It- ,;z: :~ .% ,0 0,.... o r.ø .... .... ~ 0. ::; - : ò · tie. , .... .oz ,1"\- :.i · => 10..... Io.I'IC .... ..-.QC "'0 010. 01 VI =-~ CI: I- · I P-. I- 0.' 0. ''''Q''''~ :...t;IIvt$ ':~c:r> ,Zt!)c:r> :~~~~~:~~~~~ ICC=,..)I( 1 .cr:Z~)I( I .««""""'-.......CC<:c:yw.l..... t~Q,.=~~~=....."'" · ..... ... ,- - · · · I , , . ,% . I~ . .- -= · V) .- , I · -' c: := 8:::! cro VI , -u 0- ..... ~< N~ N.... , ~ : ~ · -a: · = ,.... , ,O~ ,........ \ - · :IE: :C!tV'! ,ë:1- ."'''"' I · · , 0. , - .....0.0 , Z; C) 0> '<.....0>"'..... · QCI--CO ICIC¡:~)o(' ..ct_ I...H_'~ 1.....~Ot-VI -.... - 0( 6.. o ~ .... a- : C( c. z¡ Q g¡: I- ~ /)16.. /)IV'! -z -c CI: I- , , I I · .ø..... IO>M ,NO . . -- ,% , ,s: , I I fU ,t- ,q · VI , , . ,..,.. . t- .Z ]1 ..... .... C( Z; UI - VI I V, 0 1"-' "=" ~ ... I .... .'Z ..... 4:,-' Z 1\1:, 0=: 1-'0.1'1 0. ,< I""" 2: t"Iot tä -~% ... ·0>0 ~ Q.eII: "" "'a:..... ..... -' 'V' .....2: .2: ·u...,(\",.... ..,.. 3CO .. .00\...... ........4103 .... --« ""0' 010. 0>';' ~ CC I- ""~ 0< Q.... .- _.ø 0- .~ ~;; NCI: · · , · 0. :....O~C · Z~O\ I C......O\\I').:-.. .«~-cC'::' · .Zt!)x , I ct < =.."""'..... I ~c:a.ctr- V') 0..... MIQ -- ""~ so ~ ... <Q '" - ... t!) o w or. II' C) Z - I- < ~ C) o w ., .... v 0\.... ..0 "") No=. æ ð.. 2; .... ~ V> ,.. V> · · ~ , 0 · U I .. I l- I ----U .... · -:> · e , C!: , 0. , , I I , , , ... I ..... , 01 · .0.... O,,...~ .... I .. I U. .... . ...J , .... V> · I .... . ....,~ '" I..... · · , V> , l- . a: , ...... .% :ã '..... ..... ...... Z < o -.c: .0 CI:> OC: o 3 I- '30 I ........ .-..... .>< .z.... ,.... ....... t~.. , ""-'0 I 0::. I .m I VI I ..... .uo< , · · · I VI I- , ... c.. · ..... ...... I ;-~"""Q : i%~..,..", I ŒX....c:tQ I Q:""~JÞ( & ~ c-u~.- · ....a::Q....VI 'V' .... . I I I or. , , « % I- -.c: ....0 010. 01 U'\ ~i 1:1: I- ~Ull3,Ou3 CD .... ... '" .. C) o v .. 0\ it') c:I Z I- ~ CD c:::; .. ~ 0. ..... 0\ it') ~ - ... ~- ::r: .... P- VI ,.. VI ~ 0::. .... .. a- ..... .... '"'2 ~ ... ::I: ....- ... , VI , ,.. , VI: .... , .... <=> Q .... l- V ... , ..... , ....- VI .... .- '" 0= NOC> ... .... .... o ,., o .... a- ..... .... ..... .... VI w ... '" 000 oiO~ '" ... , I , 15:"" , , VI I I- ,= :; '0 I '-' . oC( ::r: I V> , P- I a:: 11 0'.... c,:) Z - c: - .... :!: i:õ z .... ~~ 0\1:1: 0\<: ,~ ez>- 'V':I: I.... '" -' 0.... O\c: oc.. I , , , , , . · 0 , -..:z:: , · ~>'" 10""'''' , 3"'" I:;&O~ 4"",,"":1: 4_~ Z I >CQ-O ~f5~i;;= '-':J;-'IU , ~... %m.... I ~U..c.n I 10- ,ts:. · .4II:I:N.... ,\I') 0..- : U~~~= VI P- z: .... ::E .... > o ~ 100 :E .--t; : ..,.g 01 ... I Q> '" . ... :z: . ~ : ... . . V) .... I ........ , ~ ..., I. I ~_c:rQ I 1%:Co- r :~;:;~~~ : IOCI.....Þf.ÞJIIC I I t C(--=~"'" , I.....O!<~V") t 12':!9:93 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I M o N , - - - ... t::I < CL « .... Ot < :z 5 ..... ~ o CI: ..... ... :IE: ;¡; I- .10( ~ ..... ! ... "" < -' ......... cCØ\ CØ\ ... - . X I- ... pj~ ....~ ~..... 8~ a:: 0 Q" I-~ Z .... :E .... >- o CI: ~ - ~ - ..... e ~ ..... :z ~ I- "T 01 Ø\ ... ~ ~Ø\ ~: W« ..... -> ~..... cz:'" ~~ -... . 100...... 09:55 ,- , I I Q\ I · g;) I . ,.... I ,~ , c: ..... I~ , I I I I , , , I , , I I · -' &oW ... 'c .¡..« :o:::~~ , I- '- V') -' ...... ~~3 ..00 ....WCI: I 0&> I . · 01> , ,~ , :1 ..... .~ , .- CI: '" <Þ2::E &QQ ........e:.:: ..... -..... e ......g .....cc 0........ .........11')... . . ,.. c;: '" i~~ _u'" M r , '" , "', ... ,-, ............ ~'c .¡..~ 11-0"1( 10....- I t-....6n~ · Ie.... I :~ 1- ,~ I · I · I I , , · · I , I :~ .~;i ,..0<.... .0....,,..<:> I .....~"'~ ...... Cl:U'I i!~ .. u '" , I · · I ,.... , , '" Ie · .... ,~ , I I , , f , , I I , · I , , · 1- .....~ '« .....« ......Qctu IOa,w_= · 1-.... U'I ..j I <Þ . 1« I "--' to : 2s ~ ~< '''' I ,... c..t 1'- .'" , · '^ I..... 'W:. , þooo V) 'g<Þ.... , 2:2: :~~5 , , I , , , , I : ~~ ...... , % ........ I Q~_ I ClCC.....« · '-~""c.J I - IV') : :;'^'^~~ · .....~......a:: r ~--_ ¥ :~==~:!!i ,c.........ui:!t I I I I I I __ I >u , ... Z. I2:Z~ · =Q C!)~ I........ c..... ..-~....... G 1«.......1 .U&...l'C~ I e=-eQII:I f.-l-J _ I UI""..... ::: =~~ I 2;' ~t-A..~ I =""'f-to1'ÞQ 10....&...1..... I '_H...) ..U:II!: 0.. f ...... "''^~ ~~IX ... U I · , IJ!:: Ie I- I. I ... I- I '" ,w , '^ :~ , l- ,'''' I ... , "";0 ,0 I '" ... '5'6403028 .....0 ...-¡.... Q- . . -... t: N ~ ~ . I'" e.... , , ...... ,< ..... . ~ :~ , 1,1) ..... i u . ..... I l- . 1& 8~ 1i .... '.... · , , , , I 1"1 :¿~!iI! ,~ ... · >- I "" .WooI 1101'):1:'" ....., -< I .....Vla: 1=>_t::I · .....C'IIII..... · I N..o .00,...N · '" le=- I '- to .. 1==== 1 ... I CZlIoI')V) I , , · , · · · I , ;¡; ex: : ! x : ~~ : t- 3;a- '~""Ø\ .. ~.--,....~ : ~~~:::æ , ;-.2:........... ~ ~ .-.Q .2: .....8:~ .....-x ~-v I 001>0 , ~'^C) · ....CD 1 . I _ · · is ~ .- - .. . .e.... ,.,. I I 1-' , .e I ::5:0 ...... ,~ · . , · · . · -'1"1 10 ·v- , I , VI ...... ,% :1 .0 ... I U · · · · -Q ~: 25a: "'11'= 8¡i~~ I ÞV5,- !£.AoW . ))1"'WJo- e:~~;: %,ZiSe:.::1oI') ß ""01-' .........x ~ -.... - ... ;¡; a: I Q ~o I ê Cl:0:I' · r-æ~O~ :!;vS:E . «__JIo- : I~~=i , ~z.""...:¡: M , CI) "" ~ . <c, ~:Q ... ,C'\I . :...ir} IQ. , '-'0 . c-.. ~ ; ~:!~I ~' :,.... Ie W}o- '.-IwO ~:gf6~ ¡j ~!:È -' -ov % a: : ~ :!: I .....N : ~ ..5E~ .!xOtE . WØ\ , -.-. ~ :Ic.:~:::r ......zV)...,i :'\CTCUG TR.~\SPORT ....<:0 .0_ on !i ... ~ on -' .... ~ I ... ... , '" . , I : .... c:> , ...á> I~"" I I '" I g' ... ~ ..... Mg CI)- 01> co: 0= , '" . I- ,E 11 IY :1 : · I IU ," , q 1 VI . I I , I , , , ....0:1' ,0 .u.... , · · I , I I I , ....... , , ct: .0 , % :1 z ! ~:'" ."'> <,... Qc-..o:: ;¡; ~oeo:Ø\", ~I N 12:. kt CO_CÐ- ~:- ~~~ t . .Ct\.l~ t U")::....ðM.t ~:u...:~g;g: - -- ....e VI~~ ..-: =~ :I: Þ- eo ..... : ... I « ... · ~..JIt'f") ;:~: tZ%~ :~~~~~ I etCCr-x I : ~z~:=~ Î ,V) I,.... 1% ,.... 'z ,;¡: 'Q .0 'u ;¡; .0 ~ .... X W - c: <or .... 00 - .... 8 ~ o .... t::I z: ... ~ 8 .... ,.... ~ I ..... f\, '....CO ..,.O-......,tw") gl....~ ff ::E ... ..... It) >- VI .... ... o .... Q\O .... I- .... ... -' ..... V) :! : U I I 1< .....'g;,\Q e:r:. ,= I · , , 1 I 1<- · '....0 · on ~ z 2 ... ~ '" ~ '" CD~ Ma:I Ch ....!:! .<Z! .:IE: ... ...< ~ ....c:o 010- V\Q\V\ -'....z ~1 == ..... i E ~ ....-'..g , Z:::C Q\ ~ ~~~~~ I æcx:>:w. I Ie .C:U",,,,, Iþ-Z:Z~V) Oo~ ....... .- . - 1 ~:;;; ex:I- , . 0..... '" , , :z <C x ..... ..... ..... .... ... 0:: "'I ... o eo: .... 1-' :>I<C .... IV ~'g I "'I ,..... 1% I ... I::E :5 . ... ........ o u- x U <C o 0::. ,""~ CLI ct' I ~: ",I I · CI: a:: ,0 0 , IX .."", · >- c:c )- ,zoc I c::> .... ,--..... 1>11')""" ,....,-- 1.....8..... ,~ ....J ..... - lc:gþooo(Q ..... t::I Q -... .... '" 011> . ........ 0.... .oa: cC-' .....0.. Q\.... .... ao: , · --.Q · ....z I ole 1 .....00-' I ....--:z: ~ -'''-'''It.,) : : Q: : 5! ~.... : t-5.t'11!2 '~;¡;Ø\Z , ....01 · ......-->-- '''''''~Þ-;¡; _< .....,...a::; I Þ-ZV'\uz 8;;; -0 . .... I I , .0 , ,.,. , , VI . ,.... ,lie , ... I%: .%: .0 C'\I.I,.) ;;; .... 0"""" ....1"11"1 · t>.I'" I , I · ,-- .0 Q · CÞ ~ 1 ... ..... , ,.... , , .J 1 oQ;, I,.) , .0 _Q 1-' . N · . I I f \ . · ""..... , ,~.... , , VI ~ ..... , :1;. ... . >. . o ,ao: 0::,.0 Q. 'E > ... ~ ~ tÞ : ~o;:ë · co..,.,. I ex> ....,10"1 ~ I ... ... "'14oa%X c.:=¡ V) 19::_V\ --0 '" :z Ø\cC V'\Ø\-' .....-x -'~ - - x ex: o x Z .....co c CXÇ' 1r--.)ftt/10N I Z%ð\Z .0(1,.)01 IQI¡;__> : I~~=æ ~Z:L.f)~:¡; l,r, ,.... I: :~ , c on ,I,.) ~ ,.... :;It x ..... ;¡; -- I I , I , · · I '0 ,01'> I I , · , ......., o:r o .r. · '1,.) · V) .- :x , . t.Q ,.... , "" 0- . VI I~ ,::; I.... I'E . :E 'Q Co . '-' ~ :r ..... . cc 0;; , O· ....,. .::. <r. & Z %' ct...." I . -J -J , Q;¡; "" ..:. IX~ ;;¡:; ... -,.... (.,.::J V) I 4'~N__ 2š:~!5='7U'1 u.~C(....,....u .-t-c:a:::o... c::. ..;:(0,....... o .;EZ'Q)..... ~:~,...z~~ %.u....-"""'~ ;.J'I .... -' - ~ -« 01>0 ~CL VI ~ VI .....-z: -' ~"' x ~ · , · , , · , I I · : ~ ~ I c¡¡: .... , .- .....n 0 I:Z:X~ · C[ uo-v.C'r.I · G:-.....~c : ~~~~~ I t-;:%~~ ~002.003 , , · · · · , I · I I , · , , - I , · , , I , · · · 1 · , I I , I · · · , , · co , 0&> I- I , .... , , ,,- _0.1'> MCD . ~ , , · · , , I Of: I I I VI , ... . .... " - I % I , .o- S :!: U ~ % ... a:: o Z co 0&> .... . .... · · , I I , .- ... ( 0-· I . >- " t- I:' ... I , W . ( I . I, · V') f :, · ÞO- I· · z: I : ~ : ¿ I:E , . 10... tD . U ." . Z " 01 I > 01' w... . : 01' - 10( :> I , o : ~ I ~ ... , : Z I' e , : ..... I , · - · - · , I.. , , .. I.. I ~ · <: '" I I~ .<: , I .. ,% IC · - .t- IC; · - " ,~ 10 'C 'Co '" , ,,. I .. · V · I 10/') I ..... 4cC,(X) jo... .- I , I · I · .ot. , , c.._ , , '0 C · 0:: a:: · ,ce: ..... · t.!) % : ¡ :::;~o&> ......= Cit- , ct I""U- 'u ~~~~ - '... . ......0." =::£.....cz . 'CIC~Q :I;...~CD"" - - '^O Ø\C- V'> 01 "'I ....-z .....~c¡¡: X ~ o ~ z: ~ , cc .... · ...-.-J-rg .Z;¡;Ø\ I ct t,J 0> ...... '" :~:;ë~~C:;» ,c:c: . eu.."..- · .....z:z......"'" I I ROAD CONDITIONS D-Dry CI - Clear C - Cloudy W-Wet R - Raining I LEGEND FOR ACCIDENT REPORTS INJURY CODE K - Killed A _ Incapacitating Injury - Severe injury which prevents continuation of normal activity. Includes broken or distorted limbs, internal injuries, crushed chest, etc. B - Non-incapacitating Injury - Evident injury such as bruises, abrasions, minor lacerations which do not incapacitate. C - Possible Injury - Injury which is claimed, reported or indicated by behavior, but without visible wounds. Includes limping, momentary unconsciousness or complaint of pain. N - Not Injured I I I FACTORS 1. Animal on Road - Domestic 2. Animal on Road - Wild 3. Backed Without Safety 4. Changed Lane When Unsafe 5. Defective or No Headlamps 6. Defective or No Stop Lamps 7. Defective or No Tail Lamps 8. Defective or No Turn Signal Lamps 9. Defective or No Trailer Breaks 10. Defective or No Vehicle Breaks 11. Defective Steering Mechanism 12. Defective or Slick Tires 13. Defective Trailer Hitch 14. Disabled in Traffic Lane 15. Disregarded Stop and Go Signal 16. Disregarded Stop Sign or Ught 17. Disregarded Turn Marks at Intersection 18. Disregarded Warning Sign at Construction 19. Distraction in Vehicle 20. Driver Inattentiveness 21. Drove Without Headlights 22. Failed to Control Speed 23. Failed to Drive in Single Lane 24. Failed to Give Half of Roadway I I I I I I TRAFFIC CONTROl o - No Control or Inoperative 1 - Officer or Flagman 2 - Stop and Go Signal 3 - Stop Sign 4 - Flashing Red Ught 5 - Turn Marks 6 - Waming Sign 7 - RR Gate or Signal 8 - Yield Sign 9 - Center Stripe or Divider 10 - No Passing Zone 11 - Other Control I I I I ACCIDENT TYÆ 1 - Sideswipe 2 - Left Turn Collision 3 - Rear-End Collision 4 - Right Angle Collision 5 - Out of Control I I I 25. Failed to Heed Warning Sign 26. Failed to Pass to Left Safely 27. Failed to Pass to Right Safely 28. Failed to Signal or Gave Wrong Signal 29. Failed to Stop at Proper Place 30. Failed to Stop for School Bus 31. Failed to Stop for Train 32. Failed to Yield ROW - Emergency Vehicle 33. Failed to Yield ROW - Open Intersection 34. Failed to Yield ROW - Private Drive 35. Failed to Yield ROW - Stop Sign 36. Failed to Yield ROW - To Pedestrian 37. Failed to Yield ROW - Turning Left 38. Failed to Yield ROW - Turn on Red 39. Failed to Yield ROW - Yield Sign 40. Fatigued or Asleep 41. Faulty Evasive Action 42. Fire in Vehicle 43. Fleeing of Evading Police 44. Followed too Closely 45. Had Been Drinking 46. Handicapped Driver (Explain in Narrative) 47. ILL (Explain in Narrative) 48. Impaired Visibility (Explain in Narrative) 49. Improper Start From Parked Position 50. Load Not Secured 51. Opened Door Into Traffic Lane 52. Oversized Vehicle or Load 53. Overtake and Pass Insufficient Clearance 54. Parked and Failed to Set Brakes 55. Parked in Traffic Lane 56. Parked Without Ughts 57. Passed in No Passing Zone 58. Passed on Right Shoulder 59. Pedestrian Failed to Yield ROW to Vehicle 60. Speeding - Unsafe (Under Umit) 61. Speeding - Over Umit 62. Taking Medication (Explain in Narrative) 63. Turned Improperly - Cut Corner on Left 64. Turned Improperly - Wide Right 65. Turned Improperly - Wrong Lane 66. Turned When Unsafe 67. Under Influence - Alcohol 68. Under Influence - Drug 69. Wrong Side - Approach or in Intersection 70. Wrong Side - Not Passing 71. Wrong Way - One Way Road 72. Other Factor (Comments) I I I I I II I I I r<'\ t ~ ! : 1~¡~ 's "'8 Q) ~ -< «I ~ (f'\ ~:§O~ .¡:: øa I .a O.J: ~:§ ~ 1: ...' <+.: ~ 0 - ..z- C'I) .æ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I ~ - ... ~ fi C) .S Q) e o ~ In ~ ~ .1$............ _ N _ ~ (f'\ N N _ N - (f'\ ~ (f'\ N (f'\ (f'\ - (f'\ (f'\ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ (f'\ r<'\ (f'\ (f'\ ~ - .:§.<~ ~)~ 6$ I5ÞNN~N ~<~ NN~N~O\ ONONO O\ON~NO\NO\O\NOOO ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~r;:;~~~~~ o N ~(f'\ r<'\ N r;:;~~~r;:;r;:;~r;:;r;:; ~~~r--Nr<'\~ ~-~r<'\N ~ (f'\ r-- - ~ ~ ~ zzzuzzzzzzzuzzuuzzzzuzzzzzuzzzz .i; ~ ,S ~j u uuuu~uuuuuu-u~~~~~u~O~~uu~O~Ouuu OOOO~OOOOOOO~~~~~O~~~~OO~~~~OOO In In ... ] ......... ... ... ... ... ... ...]... ... ... O~joOOOOO~OOOOoo~OojoOo~OO~ co .~ co ~ ~ .~ .~ ~ .~ ~ co .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ ~ co .~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ co .~ .~ 00 =~=l=~~=~==~~~~~=æ~=læ~ææ~~= ~ ~ ~~~ co 00 00 ::r::::r::::r:: - -- ~ 8 ~ 8 tò 8 -< -< ~ ~ ~ ~ C'l)Z ~~ ~ § -< ~ ~ 8 C'I) ~ r--IO C) 8< -~ ~ In In C'l)C'I)zzC'l) 8 00008< O\~r<'\~~~ ~ 8 ~ tò 8 -< ~ ~ 8 C'l)tòZZ o ~o r<'\ __ z8C'1)8 tò tò 8 ~ - - 8z~~ ~ 1010 ~ - - - - - - - - -- - ........ ........ ........ ........ - -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = = d = = = = d = d = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I)C'I) .æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ §~ª~ª~~§ª§ª~ª~~~ª§~ª~§~§§~ªªªª~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o ·NION- ~101O(f'\ION~IO~IO~IO~~~~-NIO~N~~~~~N r<'\ r<'\ ~ ~ r<'\(f'\~~ - ~~r<'\(f'\~ ~~~~~_~~~S8~coõlO~S~~~~~~~~8~~~~~ r--O\O\~ O_~COr<'\CO~_~O\~Nr--~O\~~r--~ooooO\O\-~ ~ ~~~NN ~ ~N~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~N~ ass=~~~~~~~~~~~~~aªa~~Ñ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~sssssssss~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ægg~ ~~~~~~~ 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ ~~~ SS~ - -- ~~~ 0\0\0\ r<'\Õ~8~~~~~~;~~Ñ~~~~Ir--i r--co 1Or--r--OOCOCOoo-r--r--co- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~NiN 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ Nr<'\~~IOr--C00\9-~r<'\~~~~~~g= ...... ~............................... \...... N \,..... N ,..... N "'.... ,..... ".... \...... "I ,., .':¡';';" ..... ~ ita C'I) ~ z Nr<'\~~IOr--OOO\O- - - I I I I I I I I c<'I 1:: ~ ! : '" c<'I = = ..... ~æ~.# ()"Ò Q)~ < ~ g c<'I Q):ao~ '>c:"~ I .a ~ _0 0,J: ~_ ~~~<+.; =Z- ('/) .æ =' ~ I I I ~ ~ ...... I I I I I I I I 8·... ._ .8 ..~ a ~ ::I ('/)Z ::¡.. 0"'.8 II) a ('/) = Z Q) Q) () () 1 .... ~ ë 1 ... 8 () () æ () ~ IS as as J: J: "E ¢:: "E ~ .£ ~ e -8 '" .... '" is ~ is c<'I - N ~ N - -N - ~ - c<'IN_c<'Ic<'INc<'INNNc<'Ic<'Ic<'INc<'I~--c<'I NOlr)o\-OIr)Ir) - 0\ NO\_NNO\NO\NOO\NNNO\O\NO\c<'INIr)O - ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ NI"'-~ Nc<'I~ ~~~~ o N I"'- I"'- c<'I c<'I ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~œ N l"'- N c<'I ~ ZZZZZZZZZZUZZZZZUUZZZUUZUZZZZU uüuuuuuu~~u~uüuuuu~u~üuuüuuuu o~oooooo~~o~o~oooo~o~~oo~oooo ..... ............... ............... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 00000~~0~0~00~~0000000 00 "'ooN '" '" "'0000 "'00 "'00 '" "'0000 '" '" '" '" '" ",Noo =]=]]]==]=]=]!==]]]!]]= ... 000S?= ~ ~ .~ èò ~ ... ==~=8 ... ~Oo 00 ~ .~ ==~ '" '" Z 8 () ~< ø;I ~ '" '" '" '" Z 8 8 o()() Ir)« Nø;Iø;I ~~ 8 '" '" '" '" 1"'-8('/)8 \0<0< ø;ll"'-ø;I ~ ~ '" '" 8Z <8 ø;lN ~ 8 8 ~ ~ ('/) f::::Zf::::()() --8....«0 - ø;lø;I~ ~~ 8('/)('/)88 ('/)~ ~~ ~ ~~ ZZ~ 8 ~ 1š --- ci 8('/) ~ o Ir) - ~~ -. -. -. -. -...-...-...-...-............-..........-............ -. -. -. -. -. -. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)C'I)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)('/)C'I)('/) .æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ~~~~~~~~~~~.æ~~.æ~.æ~.æ.æ.æ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ §~§~ªª§§~§ª§~ª§ªª~ªª~~ªªªªª§§§ª 1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r)1r) Ir)N\oIr)~NN\ON~N\O\ON~Ir)\oIr)Ir)\o\oIr)~Ir)\oIr)~NN~ ~ Ir) Ir) c<'I~ ~~ c<'Ic<'Ic<'I c<'I- ~ 1"'-~00Ir)c<'I~~~~~Eg~2~~00~~~~002c<'1Ir)Ir)00~O\OON ~Ir)~~~~~,-__~~NNÒ,- ,..~,,~ ò~~~~o~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~N~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ñ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~c<'I 00 ~ -Ñ~~~c<'I ~...........-t....-t ~...-4 ~~~~~~ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ œ~~~~~~g;œ~~~~ ~~~~¡¡:;¡¡:;~ìõ~~~O\O\ ..............-1...............................-1.....................-4 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ _c<'IOOOO N~~~ ~S?NNN ,~ ~ ~ ~ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ I"'-II')f::::c<'IlI')~-OO ~~__N~g:~~ ~~~~~~~~ 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ ~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~~~~¡¡:;~~~~~~~~~~~ I I I I I I I I t"'\ .. 0- ... 0- ! : <1.1 t"'\ .. = .. ~æ! U "0 a U ¡¡¡ Q) < - ~ Q)-E0 .~ æ I o.£j~ ~ ... 0- o 0 - =z- m .æ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I t"'\t"'\N_Nt"'\t"'\__~t"'\Nt"'\Nt"'\t"'\N-t"'\~Nt"'\t"'\-~~-~N- 0- 0- OOo-O~NNOo-~Oo-NONo-NN~o-NNONNNN~Oo-~ t"'\ ~ ~ \0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ r-- N ~ r-- r-- t"'\ N ~ t"'\ r-- ~ N r-- t"'\ ~ N ~ r-- r-- ~ ~ r-- ~ ~ 00 \0 ~ r-- ~ r-- r-- N t"'\ - t"'\ N N - t"'\ N t"'\ - N t"'\ - - t"'\ t"'\ - - t"'\ t"'\ - ~ N 0- N ~ .~'8 z z z u z z z z z z u u z z z z u = z z = u z z z = < z z z u ~9 cI 4Ji.S! !'~ u u u u u u ~ ~ ~ u u u p:: u u (J ~ (J u u (J u u u u u ~ ~lOOOOOO~~~OOO~OO~~OOOOOOOOO~ p ~uu ~OO «I <1.1 <1.1 ~ ~ ß ~ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... - 0 0 «I ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 j 0 ~ 0 0 j ~ ~ 0 0 0 t"'\ 8 N N N 0- 00 <1.1 00 00 <1.1 00 00 U> U> 00 U> U> 00 U> 00 U> ~ U> 00 U> U> ~ 00 00 U> 00 00 - ... .... .... .... ~ ~ .... li ~ .¡ .... ~ ~ U> 0 ::I: ~ ::I: ::I: ~ ::I: ::I: ~ ::I: ~ ::I: ::I: ::I: ~ ::I: ::I: ::I: ::I: 2 1 "0 0 U .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ~ .... ~ .... :s .... .... .... .... - - ::E ::E c+.: <1.1 § <1.1 8 U> 8 U> 8 U> ~ 8 8 8 § U> U> 8 <1.1 m <1.1 m <1.1 <1.1 ~ U> <1.1 U> m U> m Q) Z Q) Z Q) Q) m Q) Q) Q) m ¡ U Z U m ~ U ~ m U ~ U r-- Z ~ ~ U U ~ - U ~ U \0 8 ¡ ~ 0 ~ ~ U ~ \0 \0 U U 'ë U 0 < ~ 0 0 < 0 < < < N - ~ ~ 00 t"'\ 0 - = - ~ = t"'\ = = = = = -: = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 8 8 = Jj 8 = 8 = = Jš 8 = 8 Jš 8 = 8 = 8 8 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m .æ ..ea ..ea .æ ..ea .æ .æ ..ea .æ .æ ..ea .æ ..ea .æ ..ea .æ ..ea ..ea ..ea ..ea ..ea ..ea ..ea .æ ..ea .æ ..ea .æ ..ea .æ ..ea ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 8 § § ~ 8 8 8 § 8 8 ~ § ~ ~ 8 8 § ~ § ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ 8 8 ~ § § - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'i>~ ~ ~ ""! N \0 ""! ~ ~ N ~ ~ \0 N \0 ""! t"'\ \0 N ~ - \0 ""! \0 \0 - t"'\ N \0 ""! N b ...,,*=. ~ ..¡ - t"'\ t"'\ ..¡ vi ~ ..¡ t"'\ - .(1) ~ t"'\ ~ 00 - 0 0 ~ ~ 0 - ~ i 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ r-- N 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ - - 0 t"'\ ~ ~ a ~ ~ t"'\ a - - ~ N ~ 0- 00 - - ~ ~ - r-- ~ t"'\ r-- 0- - 00 - ~ ~ 00 N - - - - - N - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ 8 ~ - - \0 r-- 00 ~ ~ ~ 00 00 ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ - N N 0- - N ~ ~ 8 - - - - - N N ~ ~ ~ - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r-- 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- ........ 0- - ~ - ~ \0 $ ~ \0 S a ~ ~ ; \0 00 0- ~ ~ \0 ~ 00 GJ r-- ~ - \0 ~ ~ ~ 0- Jr-- t"'\ 0- 0- ~ - I 00 r-- N 0 r-- ~ ~ ~ - ~ \0 t"'\ .....! ~ œ ~ - r-- r-- N ~ t"'\ ~ t"'\ ~ t"'\ ~ ~ tf'\ ~ ~ - ~ r-- tf'\ r-- ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ 0 - - - N tf'\ tf'\ ~ ~ \0 r-- r-- 00 ~ t::>SN ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t"'\ ~ ~ tf'\ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ tf'\ ~ ~ a j )iz~ 0 ~ 0 0 .(1)... ..... .... 0- N N N N ~ N N N 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- .. ".:.:.1oie t"'\ ~ ~ \0 r-- 00 $ 0 - N t"'\ ~ ~ \0 r-- 00 0- 0 - N tf'\ ~ ~ \0 r-- 00 0- ~ - N t"'\ Æ \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0- 0- 0- ira m;s Z ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I ~ ..... 0\ ... 0\ ~ - I - ~ ~ 6 ~ ... - .... .8 .: :g ::r::: e 111 I t) ~ Q) - < tä g ~ Q)~O ~ .~ Jâ I '" .a o.;¡~ .£ I -- ~ ... 0\ <+.: o 0 - C: z ~ fI) ~ .æ I &! ~ ...... I I I I I I I ¢: ~ -8 ~ ~_~~~~N~N~_~N~__N_N~~~N~~~-~-~ 000\0\NO\II1NNNO\II10NNO\NO\NNO\NII1O\NO ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~~æ~;~ ~r-Nr-~ooNr-N 1O~r-~~~N~N -0\ ~- ~~ r-~~~ -~N~ 111 ~ ~- ~IO ~r-O\r-r-IO ~-N~~IO ~~ N N N N N N N N N N zzzuzuzz<zuu~uzzzz~zuz<zuuzuzz uuuûuuu~uu~~uuuuuuuuuuuuûuuuuuu ooo~ooo~oo~~oooooooooooo~oooooo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~~ooooooo~~~oo~~o~ooooo~oo~o~o .~ 00 00 .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ 00 00 00 .! .~ 00 00 .S9 00 .!! .~ .!!3 .~ .~ 00 .!3 .~ 00 .~ 00 ~ ~==~~~~~~~===~~==~=~~~~~=~~=~== '" '" z 8 t) 111< ~~ ~ '" '" '" '" Q) Q) g g -« ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 8 ... r- <~IO~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ '" 8 8(1)8~ ~z~ ~g 8 -< ~ ~ ~ fI)fI) II1Ïn r- 00 '" '" '" '" 8(1) 8~ <8<~ ~~~ ~ ~ 88 ~~ fl)fI)~z Ô]IOÓ 111 11'\ ...-4~ ~ fl)8f1)fI) ~ 8 ~~ ~ ~- 111 r- -....-...-............-...-....-....-... -.... -... ....... -.... - -- -...-............-...........-...........-.... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C: C: C: C: C: 8 C: 8 8 C: 8 C: 8 C: 8 C: 8 8 C: C: ~ 8 C: 8 C: C: C: C: 8 C: 8 fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI) .æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ &!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&! ~ª§~~ªª§ª~ª§§~~§§~§~~~ª~ªª~§ª§§ 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111'\11111111111111111111'\111111111111 ~NII1IOII1~~II1IOII1NN\OIONNIONIO~IO~\O~II1I11NII1N~ ~ ~ ~111111~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 01l1~NO_II'\_~1I101l1111111r-~0\!~ONII1000001l101l10\ ~~~~~~~=~~~~_~~'~__.~~~~_~_~o~__ ~_~~"'~N~_~~~~~~=~,~~r-~~~II1=r-O\O\N~ ~~~~~~~ii~~~~~~~~~~ªª~~Ñ~~§88§ 999999~00~~~~~~~~~~~~~8888---- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~G~~ß~~~E~ON ~~~~~~~~ªª~ª~~ O\O\O\O\O\~~~~~~~~~ ;;§ 8- 111 111 00 NN 0\ 0\ ~~~~~~~~~f::~~ _NN~~~~II1r-ooO\~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ Or-- j~~ N N ,~ 0\0\0\ . loo~II1\Or-oo <] 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ ~<a Z ~8 - õ~að~8S~ ................................................ 8~=~~~~~~~~~Ñ~~~ ................................................................................................ I I I I I I I I (f'I ..... 01 ... 01 ! ..... I ..... (f'I ..... '" 5 := ... .... .8 ~ :'5! :I: e \I') I o "0 Q) ..... ~ t¡ ~ (f'I Q):a~ ~ .~ ~ I '" .a ~~~ ..9 - I ~ 0 ..... .;.: C Z ....;- fIl ~ ~ § I ~ t¡ ...... I I I I I I I Q) o ~ ] § o o IE ~ "E ~ Q) ... '" is (f'I....................(f'I.....(f'I.....N.....\I')(f'I..........(f'I(f'I(f'I(f'I(f'I.....(f'I(f'I.....(f'IN(f'I(f'I(f'I(f'I N 01 \I') \I')\I')NNOO\l')OOOlOl\l')OOl OIOINOOO(f'lOO ONN ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~æ~~~~~(f'I~~~~~~~~~~~~~ N N ZUZZZZZ<UUUZ<ZZZZZZZZUUZZZZZUZU u~~uuu~~~uuu~uuüüu~~~~uuu~uüüüü ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ o~~o~oo~~~~~~~o~~o~~ ~ .!2 .!2 ~ 00 ~ ~ .!2 .!2 00 .!2 00 .!2 .!2 ~ .!2 00 ~ .!2 00 =~~====~~=~=~~=~==~= .... ...... ..... ~~~~~~ _ '" fI) '" '" - 'i .....- 'i =~~~8~ ... ... ~~~O~ 00 .!2 .!2 ~ 00 =~~== ZZ ~~ tI.) tI.) tI.) fIj ~ ~ ~ ~ o 000 o 0 0 0 «« ø:1ø:1ø:1ø:1 ~~~~ '" fI) 8 Z 8 o 0 <~< ø:1 ø:1 ~ ~ '" ~ o fIl o <~ ø:1 ~ '" '" fIlfllfllzz8 o 08' 0\1')' < ~~.....(f'I~~ø:1 ~ fIlfll 88 ~..... Zz 18 ..... (f'I ~ZZZZfIlfllZZ lj 8888888 .....N.....(f'I.....N.....N ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C C C 8 C 8 C 8 8 C 8 C 8 C 8 C C C C C C C C 8 C C C C 8 C C fIlfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfllfll ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ §~~ªª§ªª~§~ª~~§ªªª~ªªªª~§ª§ª~ªª \1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1')\1') \I')\I')NNNN\I')\I')N\I')(f'I\I')\I')N\I')\I')\I')\I')\I')~~\I')\I')~\I')~~\I')\I')(f'I ~~ ~\I') ~ ~~ \I')~(f'I~~(f'I\I')~~"",~""'\I')~(f'I OOO~NOIoo~ooOlOlooooOOl~(f'IN~ONOOO~OO(f'lOO ~~~~~::~¡Ñ~~~æ~~~:Ñ~=~~~~~~Ñ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ON(f'I\I')\I')\I')~~O""'~~O""'\I')OIOIOI""'~~O\l')booS""'(f'I õõõõõõõõas..........======~.....~~~N~NSS ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oo NNNNNNNNNNN~NNNNNNNNNNNNNN(f'I(f'I OIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOI~,OIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOI 1.r~ ~ ~ ~ g ; ~ E Ë Ë ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ .~<~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~OIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOIOI ~~~~~gO""'~\I') \l')OOC'l.....~ (f'I~.....OI ~~8S~NÑ~;~ ~~~~~~~~~~ 01 ~, 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 ~~! N(f'I(f'I 010101 >'" ~ ~ Ñ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ iñ ~ ~ ;;!; ~ ':r:~"'" ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... V) ;;I Z I I I I I I I I M .... 0- ~ 0- ~ : .... '" M = = ~ -8:E.8,# '¡:) "'0 ~ 11'\ < ~ ~ ~ C ):aO~ .~:.~ I .ä -~ .sa O.;¡~_ ~ ~ ~ cö.: = z ...: C'I) .æ ~ I I I ~ ¡ ..... I I I I I I I I is .-8.,..~. :~.,.. . - - - . ..~ oF-< <.. .ü......,· lEg ~i~ j J. 0() j '" &: 8 CIS ]- "'0 £ ~__M~~M_M~M_M__M_N_MNM_~NMNMNMII'\ 0- 0- NOo-o-NNOII'\NN 11'\ II'\NNNN 11'\ o-NN - Oll'\o-o-No-No-o- - N N N ~ 00 N N ~ 0 - N \0 t' N N ~ 11'\ \0 M N N 11'\ ~ t' ~ N ~ t' ~~ t' N t' t' ;;p; N t' N t' 11'\ t' ~ N ~ t' ~ N - \0 \0 N t' - - N - - N - M N M N - - M N M t' u z z z z z < z z u u z z z z z z z z u Z Z Z Z ø:I U U U Z Z < .= "'0 '0' ,~;:¡ Û ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ Û ~ ~ U U U ~ ~ Û u Û u ~ ~ Û u ~ ~ ~ ! ..~.' u u u u u u þI:: ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ U '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .a ~ .a ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 '" 00 00 00 '" 00 '" 00 00 '" 00 00 '" 00 00 '" 00 00 00 '" 00 '" 00 '" 00 00 '" ~ B ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ .... .... ~ .... .... ~ CIS .... = = = = = = = = ~ = = ~ IE = IE IE ~ = ~ = = "'0 .~ .g ~ ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ! Ø:: ! ~ ~ 8 '" '" 8 '" '" '" 8 '" 8 '" '" 8 '" '" '" 8 8 '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ '" z '" '" C ) C ) z C ) z C ) C ) C ) C ) C ) C ) en Z C ) Z Z ~ 0 0 t' 0 0 0 ~ z 0 t' 0 0 ~ 0 0 en 0 ~ z ~ z z 0 < 0 0 - \0 8 0 < \0 0 0 < 13 0 8 ~ 0 ~ ~ < b < < ~ < < < < M < . b b 11'\ ø:I ø:I 11'\ ø:I 11'\ ø:I ø:I ~ ø:I ø:I ø:I - ø:I - - ø:I - N N 00 ~ ~ ~ ¡¡,; ¡¡,; ¡¡,; ¡¡,; ¡¡,; ¡¡,; ¡¡,; -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ j ~ j j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 = = c c 8 = 8 Jj 8 8 = = 8 8 C'I) en en en en en en en en en en en en en en C'I) en en en en en en en en en C'I) .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ.æ .æ .æ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ¡¡,; 8 8 ~ 8 ~ § § ~ §§ ~ § § ~ § 8 § 8 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 8 ~ ~ 8 §~ 11'\ - - - - - - - - - - 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ ~ 11'\ M M "1 \0 M 11'\ N N \0 "1 M \0 N N \0 N 11'\ N 11'\ ~ 11'\ N \0 ~ 11'\ \0 11'\ ~ "1 11'\ M .¿ M 11'\ 11'\ rf'\ - - .¿ 0 00 00 11'\ ~ ~ 11'\ - \0 - N ~ - ~ ~ 11'\ 8 N 0 M ~ ~ ~ ~ t' - 11'\ ~ 11'\ ~ - 0 ~ ~ 11'\ - 11'\ - ~ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ M 11'\ M M 11'\ N - ~ N 00 00 ~ ~ - 0 0- M t' 00 t' M - 11'\ Q\ 00 \0 00 - 11'\ ~ 11'\ 11'\ 00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N - - - - - 8 00 00 t' 00 00 ~ 00 ~ - M ~ 0 Q\ 0 § - - - ~ 8 b - N N M 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 0 0 - - - N M ~ - ~ - N 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ a a a a a a a a M a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0- 0- Q\ 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- Q\ 0- 0- Q\ 0- 0- Q\ Q\ 0- Q\ 0- Q\ 0- Q\ Q\ 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 8" 00 00 ~ t' ~ 00 ! ~ - N ~ $ N t' ~ 0 ~ M 11'\ ~ N ~ M 11'\ \0 0 0 0 0- \0 0- ~ 0 11'\ t' t' ~ ~ 00 æ § 00 ~ ¡ 00 b 11'\ - ~ 00 M - - N ~ .....8 - ~ 11'\ 00 N ~ 0- - ~ - 11'\ ~ ~ ~ M M M M tiS - - - M 8 § § - - ~ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ t' t' t' t' 8 8 8 8 - - 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~'= 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .z M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0- M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0- 0- Q\ 0- 0- 0- Q\ 0- 0- 0- Q\ 0- Q\ 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- Q\ 0- 0- 0- .:¡.¡t \0 t' 00 0- ~ - N æ ;;p; ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ 0 - N M ~ 11'\ \0 t' 00 0- 0 - N M ~ 11'\ \0 .8 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ 11'\ \0 \0 \0 t' t' t' t' t' t' t' t' t' t' 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 g"s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1;1),= Z I I I I I I I I ('f'\ ~ - I .... ¡., ~ ~~;:;:: ]~j~ '5 :I: a;?; Q"'g Q)- < ~ ~ ('f'\ Q):a~~ .~ æ I 2 ~.s~~ ~ 5 ~ ~ =z- en ~ ~ I I ~ I .... I I I I I I I I ¡.,. ~ i's (/} ;::s Z Q) Q ~ ] ~ Q Q If: ~ '0 ¡., ~ '" is ~ i 'C ! J '<t'-('f'\('f'\ _NNNN('f'\('f'\N('f'\_N('f'\'<t'('f'\('f'\N'<t'('f'\-N('f'\NN'<t'NN 0\ ~OOO\NO\OOOO\O\NO'<t'~O\~OOO NOO o N ('f'\~ '<t'- ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~:z~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ N t' '<t'NNO\~~~O'<t'~ '<t'Nt'('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\N'<t'('f'\ ~~'<t'~~~('f'\- _('f'\'<t'('f'\('f'\-('f'\~ N N N ~ ~ - uzuzzuuzzzuuuz~zzzuu~zz~uzuuuz u~~û---uuuuu--uu-û-uû~u-ûuuuuu ~~~~ggg~~~~~gg~~g~g~~~~g~~~~~~ ¡., OO~O ~ ~.~ ~ ==~= ¡.,¡., ¡., ¡.,¡.,¡.,::9¡.,::9 ~~oo~oooooo~~~-~-o .B ",NN ",NNNNNN '" '" '" 0 '" 0N i!ææ!ææææææ!!!s!sæ ¡., ¡., ¡., ¡., ~~~~~~~ CIO .~ CIO CIO .~ .B '" =: ~ :I: :I: ~ ~ .~ þIIoIot~""""""~æ~ '" '" '" '" Q) Q) Q Q Q Q « ~ :Q ~~ '" z ~ ::= en 8 =0< ~-~ ~zenzz~ <ogoo ~~('f'\~~ ~ en o ~ zzzenenz~~~ og" g09 -('f'\¡('f'\~'" enzZzenzen ]ooog]o ~~~N__~ C'! -- -- -- -- --. ........ ........ -... -.....................................................-...--.-........... -- -- -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = = = = = 8 = 8 = 8 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en en ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ª§§ª~~ªªªª~ª~§ªª§~ª~ªªª§ªªªª~ªª ~~~~~'<t'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NN~~('f'\'<t'~'<t''<t'~~'<t'~~'<t'~~~~~~~N'<t'~'<t''<t'~'<t''<t' ~~ ~ ~_ -~ ('f'\~~~ ~ '<t'OClO~0~~~N~~0\~CIOO~2~'<t'~N~00~~0\'<t'~~ ~~~~~E~~E~~~~Sª~2E~=~~E~=~=§!E ~~~~ªªªªªªªª~~~~gg~~~~~§~~~~~~ ('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\ 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ -('f'\'<t'('f'\0'<t'~ b~Ñ~~~t' CIOCIOCIOCIOCIOCIOCIO ...-4 ...... ...... ...... ..... ...-I ...-4 0000000 ('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\ 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ ~~~:?ó~&~~~~=~~iñ &8~~2~-S~~~~~tõ õ~~~~~~ööö~~~~ ('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\ 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ NCIO_('f'\~('f'\('f'\~N ~öõ~~t'~tõ~Ñ CIOO\O--NN('f'\('f'\ ~~aaaaaaa ('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\('f'\ 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ E~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I I I I I I I I M .... 0\ .. 0\ ~ - I - Ø::: M .... ~ .. .8 ... ] 'û ::I: e < -g Q) I tIS ~ Q) :aO >.~ I .¡:: ~ 0.£3~ I ~ .. 0\ o 0 - = Z - tI) ~ c2 ~ &! I tIS ...... I I I I I I I ClJ ] () .! t G' - IIM.MNN.NM_NMM_NM~._NMMM-NNMNM-MN .~ ....... Ii'i ·.!.·.·.··...c()...~...... Hu 0\ ONNOOO\ON~OO\O\OOO\O\NMOO\OO~O~O\ NOOO\ .: ~ - M 0\ ] .s¡ ...- <+.: ~~ œ~~~~~~~~~~·~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ N r-- o N ~~~~~œ N N o N .Nr-- NM ZZUZ ZZZUZUZZUZUZUZUUZZZZZZZZU ~ü~UUUUU~~UU~ÜÜÜUUÜÜ~UUUUUUUU ~O~OOOOO~~OO~~OOOOOO~OOOOOOOO ~~ "" "" "" "" 8 8 Z «0 ~ p: p: N ~~ .. .. O~O BooB ~ ::I: ~ æ-æ .. .. .. 0000 B "" "" N os .... ..... 00 > ~ ~ ~ æ~~;::o "" ...... lI.. .... 000:!00000~ B .~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ .~ 00 ~ t~.s¡ t::I:::I:::I: t::I: .¡:: ....¡ ;::0 8 ....¡ - - - ....¡ - ø.. :E .. .... 0000 B ~.~ B ~ ::I: ~ ~ æ-~æ .. .. .. 0000 ~ .~ .~ B 23~~~ ~~ 00 00 ::I:::I: - - Z o ~ - "" "" "" "" Q) Q) () () « p: p: ~~ "" "" tl)ZZZtI) 8 in~8' in 8' < ~~_~Np: ~ "" "" 8t1)tI) <8~ p: ~- ~ ZZ~ ~~ ZtI) ::¡ =0 ,,",,:M ZZZ 888 --N ---................---.................................................................................. - - - ........................-...-...-................................... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI)tI) c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2c2 &!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&!&! §§§ªªªªª§ª~~ªª~ª~ªªªªª§§ªªªªªªª ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NN..~.MN.~~~.~~-~.~~~N~.~.M~~. _ M ~~M ~M ~ M~~ - ~ ~~ O~~ ~~M - -- ~~ - - =EŠ~~N-~N-~~~~~E~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~N~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~§§§§~~~~~~~§§§§§~~~§§§~§§~ MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ 8 .... .- ] te .Q):::S UJZ OOO.~ -~Mr-- ~~~~ M M M M 0000 M M M M 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 8~~~:::~~~r::~ .MM.OOMOOOOOOo\ ~~r--r--r--0\0000000\ 8888888888 MMMMMMMMMM 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ ~§ 8! M M 0\0\ M-OONNOON~~~OO~~!~ ~~8~~~~O\ÑM~~('S-ëõ __NNNM~~~~\Or--oooooo !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ . .:J,¡,;¡¡ . ..] i'a tI) ;3 Z OOO\O_NM~~~r--OOO\O-NM.~~r--OOO\~-NM~~~r--OO ÑÑ~~~~NN~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~N~~~~ I I I I I I I I f"'I .... 0\ .... 0\ ~ - ~ r;:; ....~ .8æ~.: '8 -g Q) ~ < as ~ f"'I Q)~O~ .~ ~ I 2 o.;¡~:§ ~ ~ ~ .;.: c=Z- fI) ..æ ~ I I I ~ g as ..... I I I I I I I I ~ - 1- 01) ] <1.1 as Ii: ~ - 1- 01) ] <1.1 as Ii: .~... »< f"'I f"'I _ _ N ~ f"'I f"'I N f"'I ~ N f"'I N f"'I f"'I f"'I - In f"'I N N f"'I N N N ~ - N N - ~i~ ~.....~... ~-g eg 81;) 0\ _00\0\000\0 - _ONNNNONNo\ - 0\ -NON- - - 00\0 001n1n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 N ~ ~ r- r- r- In N ~ r- ~ ~ r- ~ r- ~ ~ N ~ ~ N r- r- ~ r- f"'I In ~ r- ~ - f"'I - N f"'I f"'I f"'I N N f"'I f"'I f"'I f"'I - f"'I N \0 N \0 ZZZZZZ<ZUZZZUUUZZZZZ<ZUZ~UUZ~~u uGuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu ~~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOOO )::~ ~ ~~~ .~ ß 00 00 00 ~s=== I~ u= ~~ <1.1 <1.1 11 o 0 uu .... .... 000 .~ .B ~ ~~= "0 ~o ß~ s= ........"0...."0.... 00~0~0000 .B'i'.B<I.IN<I.INN as .~ ~ III .&J 00 ... 00 00 æ~SæS=~== .... .... .... "0 .... 000000~0 <1.1 <1.1 N N N <1.1 'i' <1.1 ..,.01 ._ 00 00 00 .. ..c .... ~~===~S~ <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 fl)88 ô u u In« -~~ ~~ 8 z~ ô ~ ZZ ôÍl') f"'I - fl)ZfI)ZZfI)ZfI) ~~~~~~~~ ZfI)fI)ZZZZZfI)fI) §~~~~~Ë~~~ - Z~ 8 '6 - - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= c= g c= g c= fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI)fI) ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ªª§ªª~ªªª~ªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªª§ªªª In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In In ~NN~\O~~~In~~In~In~InIn~In~In~~~~~~~~1n In Inln ~In ~ ~f"'IM~f"'Iln In - ~ ~g~8~~~~~~g~~~gg~g~g 9f"'1_N_f"'I_f"'I_f"'I_~_Inr-~~In~-NO\f"'IN~~ ".... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... r-\OO~O ~iñ;;:\Oœ ..... ..... ..... ..... ~~ - ~~~~~ggg~i~iggss===~~~~~~~~~~~ 88888888~0~0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ f"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'I 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ ~~~~ f"'If"'If"'If"'I SSSS f"'I f"'I f"'I f"'I 0\0\0\0\ ~ 0 e~ In In 00 f"'I f"'I 0\0\ ON-~-InNf"'If"'I ~~~~~~sr;:;~ ~~In\O\Or-r-r-r- SSSSSSSSS f"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'I 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ ~f"'I_~InONlnooO--Or- 1n~$00~SS~;~8~5;t!œ oOO----NNf"'If"'If"'If"'I SSSSSSSSSSSSS f"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'If"'I 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ .¡., g"1 fI) .;1 Z O\O_Nf"'I~In\Or-ooO\~-~f"'I~~~r-oo$O-Nf"'I~In\Or-ooO\ ~~~~~~~~~~~N~N~NNN~~N~~~~~~~~~~ I I I I I I I I I ("') 1:: ~ ! : en("') C == '- -8æ.8~ ·õ "'è e IT) t) {¡ Q) ..... -<:=~~ .~ ~ I 2 t:I N 0 '€~=? ~ 0 ..... .... ~z..... ..æ ~ ~ ~ as ~ I I I I I I I I I I I 8 ~ ] g t) æ ~ "'è ~ ~ e en Õ .~~N(",)NNN""''''''(",)NN'''''N(''')'''''N(''')NIT)(''')(''')N(''')(''')(''')'''''~N(",)'''''''''' :if; 8F-'i "<d Iii 0 0 N NON N N ~ N N ~ N N ~ M M ~ ~ MOM ~ 0 ~ M ~ N ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ("') ~ ~ - ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ N N ("') ~ N N ~ r--- N r--- r--- ~ ~ IT) r--- r--- r--- - r--- ~ r--- IT) ~ r--- ~ ~ ~ 10 ~ 0 ~ N IT) IT) ~ ~ r--- ("') ("') N ("') ("') ("') 10 ..... ("') ("') ~ ("') ..... ..... ("') - N r--- ("') - ..... ("') N .~ :i~ ..g ~i .0 ·.U ZuZZZuZZZuuZ~uZ~~ZZuZ~ZZu~ZZZZZ uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu~uuüüuuu~u~üu t:lt:It:It:It:It:It:It:It:It:It:It:It:It:It:It:It:It:I~t:lt:I~t:lt:lt:lt:I~t:I~~t:I ~ Š~ ~ as o > U 'C ø.. "'è"'è o~~S? N en en v. 00..0..000 ::cee~ _ 0 0 ;:::::¡ UU ~ ~ ~ t:lt:Ioot:l! ~ .¡ ~ ~ .¡ ~ æ~2323~u ~ ~ ~ ~ t:I~~ot:lt:lt:l~ .~ 00 00 ~ .~ .~ .~ 00 ~232323~~~23 ~~ 0 ~ ~~ 00 00 2323 Q)~~ ~OOOO :32323 en en Z Z 8 t) -< ~ ~ ~8 Q)r--- glO -< ~ ~ ~ en en Q) ~ en t) t) 8 «< ~~~ ~~~ 8 ~ ~ g -< ~ ~ ~~~ .....~ rJ)~ZZ IObb ~~ ZZZZZZZrJ)rJ)rJ) 88~~b~8ªb8 N - ..... r---..... IT) '"' ("') ..... ~8 N("') bb IT) IT) -...-.........................-..........-................................ ......................................................................................................................... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ)rJ) ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ..æ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ªªªªªªª§§§ªªªª§ª~§~ªªªªªª§§ª§ª§ IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) IT) ~ IT) IT) ~ ~ ("') N NIT) ~ IT) ~ \0 N ~ IT) "1 IT) IT) "1 ~ IT) IT) IT) N "1 ~ IT) IT) N ..¡. ..¡. IÓ ..... IÓ ("') ("') II'Ï vi IT) ..... d ("') ..... ~ 10 00 ~ IT) 0 IT) 00 ~ 00 00 IT) 0 ~ ~ 8 IT) 0 IT) 8 ..... ~ r--- 8 ~ 00 ð~ N IT) ~ ..... œ ("') ("') ~~ N ({l ..... 8 ~ ~ ..... N ("') ("') IT) IT) r--- ~ IT) 00 r--- ~ ~ IT) ("') - ..... - ("') 00 00 ~ - ..... ..... ..... - ..... N ..... - ..... ..... - ..... - - - - - ..... - ..... - ..... - ..... N- - 0 0 - - - §§§~~ O_NIOO\O\-~OOO(",)(",)OOªIOS 8 - 10 00 ("') ("') ("') ("') § ______N N("')888 S - - - 00 00 00 00 - - - - 0 0 0 0 ~~~~~~~~~~----_::: - - - - ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("')("')("')("')("')("')("')("')("')("')("')("')("')("')("')("') ("') ("') ("') ("') 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\0\0\0\0\ 0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ N ~ IT) IT) ~ N ("') r--- ~¡ ~ 0\ 0 ~ N 8 N N - § 00 r--- 00 ("') ("') 10 ~ 10 ~ - N r--- ("') r--- N ("') ~ ~ ("') 00 ..... ("') ~ ("') - ~ ;! - ~ N N ~ r--- ~ 00 8: N - - IT) ¡ ..... IT) ("') 8 00 ~ 00 00 00 00 00 00 0\ 0\ -.....N("')("')("') IT) IT) r--- - N N IT) IT) IT) \I') ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IT) ~ 888888 88 10 10 10 r--- b r--- b b b b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("')("')("')("')("')("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\0\0\0\0\0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ ¡"d 0 - N ("') ~ IT) 10 r--- 00 0\ ~ - N ("') ~ IT) \0 r--- 00 8:8 - S 8 ~ ~ 8 b 00 ~ 0 \.8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 - Z's N N N N N N N N N N N N ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') ("') 'rJ) "'...:s Z I I I I I I I I r.-¡ ! ~ ",r.-¡ d = .... ~... .8 '5 ~ ~ ~ < ;¡ ~ r.-¡ G)=50~ .~ '-"::1 I !:! ...~ .£ o.;¡~_ ~ ... 0- .;.; o 0 - =z..: rn .æ &! I I I ~ ~ as .... I I I I I I I I .."iš... .. ~ r.-¡ r.-¡ - ~ N N - r.-¡ N - r.-¡ :!~ ~>V' ~l >00 N 0- 0- 0- N N N NON 11'\ 0 ~() .,·,9 ~~ ~ \0 0- 0 \0 - - NN ~ 00 11'\ 11'\ ~ N 11'\ f' ~ NN r.-¡ - - N - - f' - ZZZUZZZZUZZ U-uø::- "S¿,,~~UUUUUU ..................;;>-;;>-000000 ... ... ... 00000 ~ ~ ~ .~ .~ ~ e--~~> 8t::t::.3.3æ ... ... 0000 "'SNN ... as 00 00 ~;f=23 "'CI ø::o ",N ,t:)00 ~= u rnZZ~ \0 Š?,OO '" 11'\ 11'\ - - '" '" rn~z 8....0 -¡:QII'\ ¡¡: '" '" 8z <0 ¡:QII'I ¡¡: ....... ....... ....... -... ........ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = c c = 8 c 8 8 c 8 8 c rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn .æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ.æ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ §§§~~§§§~§§§ 11'\11'\11'\11'\11'\11'\11'\11'\11'111'\11'\11'\ II'\II'\II'\\O~~NII'\~NII'\ -r.-¡\Ó \Ó r.-¡ ~ r.-¡ 11'1 0 11'\ ~ f' 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ N 0 r.-¡ - 11'\ r.-¡ 0- - - f' 0- r.-¡ r.-¡ N - - N - N - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r.-¡ ~ ~ ~ f' 00 ~ - ~ - - - N - - - - - - - - - - - r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- ~ \0 N r.-¡ ~ ~ 0- f' r.-¡ ~ ~ r.-¡ 0- N - ~ ~ ~ ~ - $ - f' 0- - 11'1 ~ : f' f' 00 0- 0- 0- b f' b b b b b 00 0 0 0 0 r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- :.._<- - N r.-¡ ~ 11'\ \0 f' 00 0- ~ - ~ >] - - - - - - - - - N .g-.,g r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ r.-¡ 0= Z