HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1994-07-11 Agendas
·
'.
1
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 11, 1994 - 6:15 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820.
NUMBER
--:'
1.PS 94-19
PS."94-20
2. PS 94-23
3. PS 94-29
4. GN 94-73
and
IR 94-99
5.. GN94-76
6. GN 94-77
...-
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
Request of James R. Harris Company for Final
Plat of Shady Oaks Addition, Phase 2
and
Request of Jams R. Harris Company for Final
Plat of Shady Oaks Addition, Phase 3 (Agenda
Item Nos. 9 & 10) (10 Minutes)
Request of John Barfield for Final Plat of
Thornbridge Addition, Phase IV-A (Agenda Item
No. 13) (5 Minutes)
Public Hearing to Consider Revisions to the
Master Thoroughfare Plan Regarding Wilson
Road - Ordinance No. 1995 (Agenda Item ·No.
14) (5 Minutes)
Ordinance Approving TU Electric's Four
Proposed New Tariffs - Ordinance No.1992
(Tabled at the June 27th Council Meeting)
(Agenda Item No. 15) (5 Minutes)
Interlocal Agreement for Northeast Tarrant
County Street Crimes Unit - Resolution No. 94-
29 (Agenda Item No. 17) (5 Minutes)
Ordinance Adopting Curfew Hours for Minors -
Ordinance No. 1994 (Agenda Item No. 18 )
(5 Minutes)
B1KC£INJIN1[c~
,
,@AUG 1 1 2005 .(
( ~\
~~\
·
e
Page 2
It
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
7. GN 94-79 Consideration of Action on all Matters Pertaining
to the Award and Sale of $3,895,000 in Sales
Tax Revenue Bonds for Park and Recreation
Purposes - Resolution No. 94-31 (Agenda Item
No. 20) (5 Minutes)
8. PU 94-53 Christmas Decorations for City Hall (Agenda Item
No. 24) (5 Minutes)
9. Other Items
Rem inder: Work Session on Capital
Improvement Program Immediately Following
City Council Meeting
10. *Executive Session (20 Minutes)
a. Personnel
b. Briefing on Pending Litigation
c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition
11. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m.
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is
contemplated, it will be taken in open session.
e
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 11, 1994
For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion
and/or action.
e
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting
June 27, 1994
5. Presentations by Boards &
Commissions
6. Presentation of Emergency
Management Certificates of
Achievement to Sean Hughes and
Gary Ingram
7. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent
Agenda
8. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by
Asterisk (16,17,19,20,21,22,24,
25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34&
35)
e
Page 2
.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
9. PS 94-19 Request of James R. Harris Company
for Final Plat of Shady Oaks Addition,
Phase 2 (Located in the 8200 Block of
North Tarrant Parkway)
10. PS 94-20 Request of James R. Harris Company
for Final Plat of Shady Oaks Addition,
Phase 3 (Located in the 8200 Block of
North Tarrant Parkway)
11. P S 94-21 Request of James R. Harris Company
for Final Plat of Shady Oaks Addition,
Phase 4 (Located in the 8200 Block of
North Tarrant Parkway)
12. PS 94-22 Request of H.T. Apartments for
Amended Plat of Lot 1, Block 2, Tapp
Addition (Located at 6424 Industrial
Park Boulevard)
13. PS 94-23 Request of John Barfield for Final Plat
of Thornbridge Addition, Phase IV-A
(Located in the 8300 Block of Thornhill
Drive)
14. PS 94-29 Public Hearing to Consider Revisions
to the Master Thoroughfare Plan
Regarding Wilson Road - Ordinance
No. 1995
e
e
Page 3
.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
15. GN 94-73 Ordinance Approving TU Electric's
Four Proposed New Tariffs -
Ordinance No. 1992 (Tabled at the
June 27, 1994 Meeting)
*16. GN 94-75 Interlocal Agreement for Precinct Line
Road Jurisdiction - Resolution No.
94-30
*17. GN 94-76 Interlocal Agreement for Northeast
Tarrant County Street Crimes Unit -
Resolution No. 94-29
18. GN 94-77 Ordinance Adopting Curfew Hours for
Minors - Ordinance No. 1994
*19. GN 94-78 Consideration of an Amendment to the
Electrical Ordinance No. 1781
Regarding Electrical License
Examinations - Ordinance No. 1993
*20. GN 94-79 Consideration of Action on all Matters
Pertaining to the Award and Sale of
$3,895,000 in Sales Tax Revenue
Bonds for Park and Recreation
Purposes - Resolution No. 94-31
*21. GN 94-80 Amendment to Contract with Texas
Department of Transportation for
NETS Program
.
e
Page 4
e
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
*22. GN 94-81 Approve Amundson Road Right-of-
Way Dedication and Abandonment-
Ordinance No. 1991
23. GN 84-82 Appointments to Civil Service
Commission
*24. PU 94-53 Christmas Decorations for City Hall
*25. PU 94-54 Professional Services Contract -
Tennis Center/Athletic Fields
*26. PU 94-55 Authorization to Solicit Bid for
Bedford-Euless Road Streetscape
Masonry Screening Wall
*27. PU 94-56 Award Bid for Equipment Lease
*28. PU 94-57 Approve Bid for ADA Restroom
Renovations at the Recreation Center
and Northfield Park
*29. PU 94-58 Award Bid for the Recreation Center
Weight Room Renovations
*30. PW 94-23 Contract for Laboratory Services with
the Trinity River Authority
e
e
Page 5
.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
*31. PW 94-24 Ratify Contract with D.B. Utilities in the
Amount of $43,400.00 for Calloway
Branch 21-lnch Parallel Sewer
*32. PW 94-25 Approve Change Order No. 1 for 1994
Miscellaneous Street Subgrade and
Surface Reconstruction
*33. PAY 94-14 Final Payment to Clifford Fogus
Company for Adventure World
Playground Construction
*34. PAY 94-15 Approve Final Pay Estimate No.1 in
the Amount of $79,133.53 to AII- T ex
Paving, Inc. for 1994 Chip Seal
Program
*35. PAY 94-16 Approve Final Pay Estimate No.4 in
the Amount of $145,780.17 to APAC-
Texas for 1993 Chip Seal Program
36. Citizens Presentation
rr-
37. Adjournment r' POSTEl
---
/1 " ,1
. ,:::t -' -.
\,
~
;
~_':_~2;-)p~r(
.
e
. '...'
Cjt~: Secretary
Byª- 1Ju;ts~
--
..
.
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No.
IR 94-99
e
^
~ Date:
vV~ Subject:
Monday, July II, 1994
Additional Infonnation on
TU Electric's Proposed Tariffs
Having reviewed TU Electric's four proposed new tariffs, I am forwarding the following
summary for your consideration:
· The Economic Development Service (or Rider ED) provision will allow TU to offer
temporary demand discounts as an incentive to retain existing and attract new commercial
and industrial customers.
· The proposed change under Rate GC (or General Service Competitive Pricing) will allow
TU to negotiate a demand charge only when TU is involved in a competitive situation
(for example, with another power supplier) and a discounted rate is necessary for them
to retain or secure new qualifying General Service commercial and industrial customers.
· Likewise, the change in Rate WPC (or Wholesale Power Competitive Pricing) will allow
TU the same latitude with demand charges when competing for the business of qualifying
wholesale customers. (In both Rate GC and WPC, the customer, energy, fuel, and power
cost charges would remain the same as the standard rate.)
e
.
Through the Environmental Technology Service (Rider ET) provision, TU could offer
incentives to qualifying customers who invest in equipment which is more energy-
efficient or improves environmental quality by a particular factor (i.e. 5kW or more).
It appears that none of these proposed tariffs will increase rates. In light of the potential
economic development and environmental benefits--and TU Electric's intensifying competitive
arena--I recommend that the Council approve the previously-tabled rates.
For your review, I am also enclosing several other pieces of infonnation on the proposed tariffs.
In addition to TU's own "Strategic Rate Options Outline", we are providing copies of a June 7th
Fort Worth Star-Telegram article ("TU requests rate flexibility to attract, keep business"), TU's
most recent rate filing Status Report, and the Irving Economic Development Foundation's
Resolution to the City of Irving supporting the requested rate changes.
I hope this infonnation sheds some light on why TU Electric has submitted the proposed new
rates. Please call me (581-5534) or TU Electric's Cherry Richardson (882-6244) if you have any
questions or wish to discuss this issue.
e
~Jk
Marty Wieder
Director of Economic Development
ISSUED BYTHE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
e
TU ELECTRIC
STRA TEGIC RATE OPTIONS OUTLINE
THIS IS NOT A RATE INCREASE
Objective:
Support economic development, job growth, energy conservation,
environmental stewardship and reasonable electric rates for
all of our customers.
Method:
The implementation of four new tariffs none of which will
increase rates.
Reason:
Competition is present in all businesses. TU Electric also
has competition. We are competing with other energy sources
and with other areas of the state and nation.
TARIFFS
Economic Development Service (Rider ED)
e
Incentive to certain conunercial and industrial customers where
the incentive is necessary for a new facility, to retain an
existing facility, or expand their present facility of 200 kW
or more.
Rate GC
For qualifying General Service commercial and industrial
customers, we may offer a negotiated demand charge. The
customer, energy, fuel and power cost charge would remain the
same as the standard rate. Available only to retain a
customer or secure new business in a competitive situation.
Rate WPC
For qualifying wholesale customers, we may offer a negotiated
demand charge. The customer, energy, fuel and power cost
charge would remain the same as the standard rate. Available
only to retain a customer or secure new business in a
competitive situation.
Environmental Technology Service (Rider ET)
Incentive to certain conunercial and industrial customers who
can qualify by converting to an energy efficient electrical
technology, and/or improve environmental quality wi th new load
of 5 kW or more.
These competitive rates will not be available to all customers. The
qualifications are strict and the safeguards are outlined in our filing to
prevent the abuse of these rates by anyone who does not qualify.
e
Both rates and riders will contribute to holding all customers' rates down.
Rider ED will increase economic activity and employment. Rider ET will save
natural resources and improve the environment.
k:\esk6\wp51\data\d209001.csm
June 9, 1994
e
(1)
C)
en
.::.::
0
en en en
a. , 0)
-
0) U
r- ,
(1) -
r- ~
-
+- 0 0
en ..... en
a: r./J ~ 0)
:= ..... ~
u .....
-- r-
0 >- 01J -
- 0)
.- - -- t::
~ ..... ~
e C) ..... u --
c:: >- -
(1) , - r-
- .... ,
0 0) - -
..., , , r- U Q) 0
ca - f- r./J .
-- -
- E r- --
-- t:: ~ - >
+- ~ 0 0 0 r-
en u -
0 - r- 0)
0. -
V 0 ....
'+- E ~ 0)
0 en U ep r-
0) 0) -
0) ......
en ..... r./J cn 0) cn
- c:
+- ..... 0) 0) Q)
.- :- C/.) en 0) >-
"+0- en ~ ~ cn 0
(1) v Q) Q) Q) .
-
t:: - ;..... ;..... >- 0.
0 u u
(1) :r: c:: c: ~ ~
CIJ -
CJ ÞOO-oj ÞOO-oj ÞOO-oj
. . . . .
e
e
"'0
c:
~
-
~
.-
u
;....
Q)
~ C/) -
.
- - "'00#
~ a.> Q)
- ~ ;....
0 r- -
- ..'00#
U 0 Q)
.....
en Q) r:./: U
(1) U - .-
...J >
.- u
~ > ;....
m . 0 C)
-
a: Q) - r- r:./:
~ -
C/'J ~ .
-
Ç/J 2
(1) - a.> 0
-
:::- "'00# - Q)
e ;.... 0 þJ) ""0 C/)
.- Q) ,.... C/) ..J:::J
~ - -
,.... ~ - a.> 0
.- - ..-.;
... C) ,.... ..... -~
-
(1) 0 OJJ u ~ -
. u
C. -
,.... - ;.... ,....
OIJ - v -
E -- c: a.> -
,.... ~ ..-.;
- - - ~ ~
QJ C/)
0 ~ ':./j -- . ~ - r:./:
. - 0
- - Q)
Ü a.> - - -
-- ..-,; ...- Q) ..... c:
,.... - ~ C/)
- ...J "'0
- ,.... ~ ~ --
..-.; - U r:./:
~ 0 QJ ""0 u :::::
u ..... ;.... ~ Q) ..J:::J
C/) c.8 -
;.... ~ ...... -
~ ~ ~ C/)
2 u u c: -- c:
...... C/)
- 0 ""0 --
- ~ -- ro
U ..-.; ,... OJ)
-- ~ - - ......
0 . CI:) Q) 0 Q)
-
...... -- Z . . ~ P:::
C/) :: CI:)
Q) ~ a.> ~ .~
...... ""0 ...... --
~ ~ c: --
P::: c: 0::: -- . QJ . .
0- ...... c:
CI:) QJ
--
e . . Q CQ
J.arau lor t.iectrlc ,:)~nlc~
Texas Utilities Electric Company
E.ù1ìblt SJH.
Page I of 2
j.1 Genenl Service
Applicable: Entire System
Effective Date:
Sheet: 11
Parte I of 2
Revision: Orir;inal
e
3.2.12
Rate GC
General Service Competitive Pricing
Application
Applicable. in the event that Company has enter= intO an Agn:ement for Elecmc Service wi!h n:speCt !heretO. fO any Customer that
otherwise qualifies for service under Company·s General Service RllCs GS. GP, or HV for all of the electric servIce supplied at one point of
delivery and measur= through one melCr, where said custOmer conlCmplalCs self-gener2tion. ceuaaon of oper2tions. or obWning service
from an allCmaave energy service supplier. and in Company·s sole judgment. Customer would not be served by Company but for the
pncing provided for herein. subject to the specw conditions set fortllherein. Service at each point of delivery IS melCred and billed
separ2lCly and a demand melCr is rcquir=.
The availability of this r2te is limited to electrical loads not otherwise contractually obligated to receive electric service from Company at the
time servIce under this r2te is scl1cdulcd to commence. The availability of this r:ate IS at the sole discn:tion of Company.
Not applicable to standby. resale. or sham! service. or lJ1 conjunc:tion with any r:ate or other service rider unless sPCCÛ!cally provided for
herem or in said r21C or rider.
Type of Service
Single or three phase. 60 hertZ. at anyone of Company's available standard service voltages as n:q\lIn:d by Customer. When: service of the
type desIred by Customer is not already available at the point of delivery. additional charges and specw conmct amngements berween
Company and Customer may be n:qulred pnor to Its being funushed. Company. may at Its opoon. melCr service on the seconaary su!e of
Cuuomer's transfonners and acIjust for transfonner los.scs In accordance With Company's Tanff for Elecmc Service.
jyIonthly Rate
e
Charge Amount
Secondary Prunary Tr:anSIlUSSlon
Customer '!Jer nOtn! of delivervl S1400 SISOO 5415.00
Demand Current month kW As specified in Agreement for Elecmc ServIce
Each current month kW in excess of the Contract kW 51.00 per kW I S¡.OO per kW 51.00 per kW
Energy per k\J.'h. all kWh O.7:c per kWh I 0.59c per 0.54c per
kWh kWh
Fuel COSt: Plus an amount for fuel COSt calculated in accordance with Rider FC. using the appropnate factor ior Gener:al Service-
Secondary, Gener:aJ Service-Pnmary. or Gener:al Service- Transmission.
Power COSt: Plus an amount for purchased power COSt calculated in accordance with Rider PCR. using the appropnate factor for General
Service -Secondary. Gener21 Service-Prunary. or High Voltage Service.
Payment: Bills are due when rendered and become past due if not paid within 16 days there3fter. Bills are Increased by S % if nOI paid
within 20 days after belJ1g n:nden:d.
Definitions
Curreni month kW is the highest 15-minute kW recorded at the pOint of delivery dunng the current month,
Contract kW is the muimum kW specified in the Agreement for Elc:c:mc ServIce.
e
(c) 1994 Texas Utilities Electric Company
Rate Schedules 29.1
e
e
e
Tarin tor Electric ~~rvlce
Texas Utilities Electric Company
Exhibj¡ SJ'H-I
Page 2 of 2
J ,1 Gener21 Service
Applicable: Entire System
Eff«tive Date:
Sheet: 12
PaSC 2 of 2
Revision: Orip,w
Special Conditions
a) The demand charge applicable [0 servIce provided under this rale shall be specified In the Agreement for Electric ServIce (Agreement)
and is the higher of:
I) The demand charge necessary 10 enable Company to provide service 10 an eXlsung or prospecnve load sudl that me IOta! cost of
provIding eJectnc servIce over the term of the Agreement is equal to or less than that of Customer's sclf-generanon or other energy
servICe amngement offered by any other ennty to serve such load.
2) The demand charge necessary for the net present value (NPV) of the projected incremental base rare revenue (BRR) received by
Company dunng the term of the Agreement to be poslDve. The NPV is the sum of NPVI and NPV2. as calcular=1 below.
· NPVI: During the period commencing with the effective dare of the Agreement and concluding in the year of the next
scheduled generating unit addition tn Company·s inregrared resource plan current at the ame the Agreement is signed. t.bc NPV
of the projected incremencù BU is the sum of the projected month1y BRR disçounlCd at Company's Weigbr=1 Average Cost of
Capital as approved by the COlM1lSSl0n tn Company·s most recent rate case (WACC).
. NPV2: During the period commencing in the year after the next scheduled generaang unit addition in Company·s inregrar=1
resource plan cUlTent at the time the Agreement is signed. and concluding at the end of the Agreement. the NPV of the
incremental BU is the sum of the month1y difference between (i) the projecred BRR that would be received under the
Agreement and (Ii) the projected BRR that would be received under Company's applicable general service rate effecave at the
lime the Agreement IS executed. discounted at Company's WACC.
b\ The total COSt of service from self·gener.1t1on or another ener¡y servIce supplier [0 an eXlseng or prospecave load will be evaluated on an
Spy basIs and will include all COStS assoCiated with the delivery of firm ener¡y service. Including but notlimíted to the COsts of any
production. transmISSion. and/or dlstnhutlon facIlities. or modifications thereto. required [0 serve Customer. including operating and
maln[enance costS. ad valorem taxl'S. and standby servIce.
C) Customer muSt furnIsh Company a notan%ed affidavit and supporting information confirmIng that Customer would have obtatned itS
energy supply from eIther self·generatlon or another supplier or would have ceased oper.1t1ons but for the negoua[ed demand charge
permitted by thIS rate. that such other energy service supply would have been more econorrucallO Customer than Company·s applicable
standard General ServIce Rale. or that such celsanon of operations would have occurred because of the economics of the Company's
applicable standard Gene%"11 ServICe Rate. and that the demand charge negotiated pursuant to thIS rate was necessary for customer to
agree [0 receive electnc servIce from Company.
Agreement
An Agreement for Electnc Service IS required.
Notice
Service hereunder IS subject [0 the orders of regulatory bodIes having junsdie!ion and to Company's Tariff for EIeelne Service.
(e) 1994 Texas UciJilies EIectne Company
Ùte Schedules 29.2
e
e
e
.1 araB tor !:.h~ctnc ,:)t:nlce
Texas Utilities Electric Company
EWbu SJH-2
P:age 1 of 2
3.4 Other
Applic~ble: Entire System
Effec:tive Date:
Sheet: 11
P~e 1 of 2
Revision: OriPn.al
3.4.11
Rate WPC
Wholesale Power Competitive Pricing
Application
Applicable. in the event tbat Company has entered into :an Agreement for Electnc Service ....Ith respect thereto. to full requirements :and
p:artial requirementS power :and energy sold by Comp:any 10 electric utilities. municlpaliaes. and to rum electnc distribution c:oopenaves for
resale to ulamate consumers in the Scate of Texas. where said customer contempl:ates self·genenaon or obcallling service from UI alternative
energy service supplier. :and in Comp:any·s sole judgment. Customer ....ould not be served by Company but for Ibe pricing provided for
herem. subject 10 Ibe special conditions set forth herein. Service at each point of delivery is metered :and billed sepanœly.
The :availability of this rate is limited 10 elecaic:a1loads not otherwise contnctually oblig:aœd 10 receive electnc service from Company :at the
time service under this rate is scbeduJed to commence. The av:ailabûity of this rate 10 new applicantS IS at Ute sole discretion of Comp:any.
Not :applicable 10 temporary or shared service. or in conjunction With any rate or other service rider unless specifically provided for herein
or 111 said rate or rider.
Type of Service
Three phase. 60 hertZ. at any most av:aíl:able pnmary distribuaon or rnnsmisslon volcage. Where service of Ute quantity and type required
by Customer is not already avail:able at Ute loc:anon 10 be served. additional charges and contnct arrangements may be required prior 10 its
bemg furnished. If Customer taltes servIce :at tnnsrrussion volt:age. Comp:any may at its option meter service on the sec:onc1azy side of
Customer's transformers and adjust for cnnsformer losses in accordance WIth Comp:any's Tanff for Electnc Service.
Monthly Rate
Charge Amounl
Pnrnary I T~snusslon
Customer (per poInt of delivery) 5235.00 I S405.QO
Dem:and Current Month kW As specified in Agreement for EIectnc
Service
Each current month kW in excess of Contract kW 51.00 per kW I 51.00 per kW
Energy per kWh. all kWh O.J7c per kWh I O.37c per kWh
Fuel Cost: Plus an amount for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Rider FC. using Ute appropnate factor for Wholesale Power ServIce-
Pnmary or Wholesale Power Service-Transmission.
Power COSI: Plus an amount for purchased power cost calculated in accordance with Rider ?CR. using Ute appropnate factor for Wholesale
Power ServIce.
Payment: Bills are due ....hen rendered and become past due if not paid withltl 16 days Utere¡fter. Bills are increased by 5 % if not paid
Wlthltl 20 days after bemg rendered.
Definitions
Current month kW is Ihe highest 15-minute kW recorded :at the pOint of delivery dunng Ute current monUt.
Contract kW is Ute m:axunum kW specified in Ute Agreement for Electric Service.
(C) 199~ Texas Ulilitles Eleclnc Comp:any
lUte Schedules 52.2
Tariff for Electric Service
Texas Utilities Electric Company
Exhibit SIH-2
Page 20f2
e
3.<4 Other
Applicable: Entire System
Effective Date:
Sheet: 11
Pap 1 of 2
Revision: OnPnal
Special Conditions
a) The demand charge applicable to servIce provIded under thiS rate shall be specified in the Agreement for E!ecaic ServIce (Agreemenr)
and IS the higher of:
1) The demand charge necessary to enable Company to provide servIce to an exisang or prospc:cave load such that the [Ora! COSt of
providing elecaic service over the term of the Agreement IS equal to or less than that of Customer's self-generation or other energy
service arnngement offered by any other ennry to serve such load.
1) The demand charge necessary for the net present value (NPV) of the projected incremental base rar.c: revenue (BRR) n:c:eived by
Company dUMg the r.c:rm of the Agreement to be: positive. The NPV is the sum of NPVI anc1 NPV2. as calculated below.
. NPVl: During the period commencmg WIth the effective dar.c: of the Agreement and concluding in the year of the next
scheduled generaang unit addiaon In Company's IlItegraled resource plan current at the ame the Agreement IS signed. the: NPV
of the projected incremental BRR is the sum of the projected monthly BRR discounled at Company's WeIghted Average COSt of
Capital as approved by the Comnusslon In Company's most recent rar.c: case (WACC).
. NPV:!: Dunng the period commencmg In the year after the next scheduled generaang unil addiaon in Company's inr.c:grarcd
resource plan current al the nme the Agreement is signed. and concluding at the end of the Agreemenl. the NPV of the
Incrementa.! BRR is the sum of the monthly difference between (i) the projected BRR thaI would be: received under the
Agreement and (ii) the projected BRR that would be receIved under Company's applicable Wholesale Power rar.c: effective al rbe
urne the Agreement IS executed. discounted at Company's WACC.
b) The total COSI of servIce from self-generation or another energy service supplier ro an eXisting or prospecave load will be evaluar.c:d on an
NPV basIs and will include all COStS assoclared with the delivery of firm energy service. Including but not limited to:
e
!) the COSts of any production. transmiSSIon. and/or disrnbution faclliries. or modlficaaons thereto. required to serve Customer.
including operating and maintenance costS and ad valorem taxes.
1) wheeling COStS.
3) the COSt of scheduling. load followlllg. andlor conrrol ¡rea services. and
4) standby servIces.
c) Customer musI furnISh Company a notarized affidavit and supporting informalion confimtlllg thaI Customer would have oblamc:d itS
energy supply from either self-generation or another energy servIce supplier but for the negollar.c:d demand charge pemunc:d by thIS r¡te.
thaI such other energy service supply would have been more economIcal [0 Cuslomer than Company·s applicable standard Wholesale
Power Rare. and thaI the demand charge negonaled pursuant 10 thIS rate lIIas necessary for Cuslomer ro agree to receIve elcctrlc service
from Company.
d) Po.....er and energy is available to paraal requirementS customers onJy in the followmg clrcumstanc:s:
I) IIIhen a gener:¡rion source which does not exceed rbe load of such cusromer is cOMected directly to and IS a pan of rbe system of
the paraal requirementS customer and is used to supplement purchases of power and energy from ru Electnc. or
1) IIIhen a partial requIrementS customer obtams power from another source. and the paroa! requirements customer:
A. has installed necessary system oper:¡nng equipment ro enable it to receive such other power under the eXlsang ERCOT
gUidelines for Control Area. or
B. has contracted with another utlliry ro effect delivery of such other power by becolTUl'lg a pan of such orber ualiry·s ERCOT
Control Area or,
c. has executed a mutually satisfactory agreemenr WIth TU Elecrnc whereby ru Electric 111111 provide Control Area services
and such other servIces as are necessary to assure the reliablliry of the supply of such other power under rerms which wIll
fully compensate TU Elecmc for the particular services required.
e
Agreement
An Agre:ment for Elecmc Service IS required.
Notice
Service hereunder is subject to the orders of regulalory bodies havlllg junsdictlon and to Company· s Tanff for Electric Service.
(c) 1994 Texas L'nlities Electric Company
Rale Schedules 52.3
e
OJ)
c
--
~
(Ij
(.)
.-
>
~
(Ij
en
.-
-
e
+-'
s:::
(1)...-..
Eo
c..w
o ¡..
- (1)
(1)-c
> --
(1) a:
c'-""
(.)
--
E
o
s:::
o
(.)
w
~
en :::s
.... U
Q) ,-
~'::::
- .-
.9 $
C/J C/J ~
:::s .... Õ
U a) ,-
> § :
~I: ..... 0
CZJ
-gB~
::-: > ~
0.. 0
o:I:o
- N
.... ~ '--
UjC:o
o c-=
$ ~ ~
Q) 0 .2
c: u5' ::::
Ol)Ou
c: u
.- OJ) ~
t.è C a)
.. .- .... U
O .....
- en --
-- ~ .- è
Q,J :::s ><: a)
~O'~ en
-
=
-
-- . .
=
;>
-<
e
a)
þJJ
-
-
"'1oJ
,-
-
U
u
c:
.. -
Q,J "1oJ
:.. ~
-
== Q)
-- u
=
Q,Ju
~ £
OJJC:
C :::s
-_ 0
.c u
tIj .~
-= Q
t:l)
=
-- .
--
tIj
.-
Q
C
~
o
u
.= en
U ...... a)
r- .....
c-: a3 e
.~ E ....
~ >a Q)
- 0 ~
o _
r- - 0
õ ~......
U E CZJ
a) a) :::s
u
u u ~
Q) Q) -
en en ~
~ ~ en
Q) a) u
.... .... ~
u U 0
.. c c: --
~~~~
......
--
--
QJ .
C
QJ
:Q
>a
...,¡
.-
>
.
.
Tariff for Electric Service
Texas Utilities Electric Company
Exhibit SlH·3
Page I of 2
e
3.1 GeneT21 Servic:e
Applic:able: Entire System
Effective Date:
Sheet: 13
Pace 1 of 2
Rfflsion: Oripnal
3.2.13
Rider ED - Economic Development Service
Application
Applicable to electric service under Rate OS. lùte Op, or Rate HV (or additional elecmcalload of 200 IcW or more when the availability of
thiS Rider ED was an important (aclOr in Customer's rmlclng the decision 10 add new electrical ¡~ or resume scrvice 10 an inacave
electncal load. subject 10 the special condiaons contained herein. The availability of thlS nder is at the sole disc:reaon of Company.
Applicable in conJUncnon With Rider ES. Not applicable in conjunction WIth any other rider. unlcu specifically Provided for herein or iD
such nder.
The provisions of Genenl Service lùtes OS. OP. or HV are modified only as shown hereiD.
l\ofonthly Rate
In accordance with the tenns of Oenenl Service Rates OS. OP. or HV. e:ltc:cpt that an Economic Development Demand Discount is applied
ro tbe Economic Development Demand according to the following schedule:
e
EcoDOmic Development DelD2nd Discount Schedule
:"umber of Years Unul :-Je:ltt CapacIty
Addiuon Discount
5 50%
~ ~%
- 30%
1 20%
1 I 10%
Definitions
The E=onomic Development Demand is dlat pomon oi the bIlling demand of the current month billing demand. as dete:muned in accordance
With the appropnate rate schedule. thai IS greater than the billing dermnd of the corresponding month in the twelve month penod pnor to
the effective date of servIce under thIS Rider.
The EconomIc Development Demand Discount IS determined by tbe number o( calendar years. or portions thereof, between the calendar
year in which servIce to CUStomer is first rendered under thiS Rider and the calendar year in which tbe next scheduled genenring unit
addlllon in Company·s Integnted Resource Plan In effect at the rime an Agreement for Elecmc Service under thIS Rider is sIgned. and will
be reduced :1Mually according to the above Economic Development Dermnd Discount Schedule. after which the EconolTUc Development
Demand Discount termlnales. If. for eumple. at tbe time that the Agreement for Electric Service IS signed and service is first rendered
under this Rider. tbe ne:ltt scheduled genentlng unit addlllon is in the ne:ltt calendar yeaf. the customer's Economic Development Demand
Discount wIll be 10% for one calendar year and saId discount will te:rtnimte thereafter. If. for eumple. at the time that the Agreement for
Electnc ServIce IS signed and service is first rendered under this Rider. the nut scheduled genenMg UlUt addinon is in the SIXth subsequent
calendar ye:zr. Customer's EconomIc Development Demand Discount will be 50% for the first calendar year, 40% for the second calendar
year. 30~ for the tblrd calendar year. 20% (or the fourth calendar year. lOr. for the fifth calendar year. and said discounr will terminate
thereafter.
Inacnve elecrrical load IS load that has been inactive for 12 months or morc.
Special Conditions
All of the (ollowing condItions must be met pnor ro service being rendered under this Rider.
e
1) Customer mUSt furnish Company a nounzed affidavit and suppOrting Informanon confimung that Cusromer had knowledge of the
e:ltlstenc: o( thiS Rider and an opportUnity 10 consider its benefits al leaSt 60 days In advance of making a decision to add die new
elecmca! load or ro resume the inacnve elecrncalload and prior to Customer·s first constrUction. purchase, or lease of new or
additional facilities or equipment necessary ro locare the business in Company·s service area. that Customer consIdered SIting its
facility OutsIde of Company·s service area. and that this RIder was an important conrnbuun¡ facror In Customer's decIsion to open a
new facility or e:ltpand an e:ltlsting facility or resume an inactive elecrrical load.
(c) 199~ Teus Urililies Electric: Company
Rate: Schedules 29.3
e
e
e
Tariff for Electric Service
Texas Utilities Electric Company
Exhibil SJH-)
Page 2 of2
).2 General Service
Applic:l.ble: Enúre System
Effective Date:
Sheet: 13
P:l.Cr 2 of 2
Revision: OrisW1
2) Cuslomer shall be required [0 demonsl~le that the addilional elecmcalload is accompanied by additional full-rime employment
withm the Company·s serviCe area. For purposes of this secrion. full-time employment is defined as an employee who has been.
or is projected [0 be. employed for alleast 1.750 hours per year.
3) An energy efficiency analySIS of the plans for the new or expanded facility mun be completed prior to the installation of the
additional cOMCCled load. Company will perfonn such analysis or review Cusromer's analysis. AU reasonably applicable.
commercially available demand-side measures that would reduce the need for electricity or that WOUld result in a more etfICiem use
of elec:aiCity will be idenatied and explained to Cusromer. The requirement for this analysis will be waived only if Cusromer an
demonstrate good cause for nOI having the analysis perfonneå. such as the use of proprietary œc:hnologies.
4) An Agreement for Elecaic Service has been executed.
If the billing demand for 12 consecutive months is less than the billing demand of the corresponding momb in the twelve-month period pnor
to the effective dare of service under this Rider. Cusromer will no longer be eligIble for service under rlUs Rider. and billing will be in
acçordancc with the applicable Gene~1 Service Rare.
Agreement
An Agreemem for Electric Service. WIth a mmunum tenn of 5 years plus the number of years of discounted demand charges received under
this rider. IS required.
(c) 1994 Texas Utililies Electric Company
Rare Schedules 29.4
e
~
0
-0 r./)
~
0 ..... aJ
- c: >
(1) ~ aJ 0
0- ~
(.) aJ U C.
-- 0-
> = ~ ~
c..;.....; -
:-.. ,... aJ 0-
-
(1) ..... I S-
0- ~ 0
en ~ e!J
aJ
~ r./) aJ r./)
.
- r- :::::
C) aJ -
0 r- C,) ~
,...
- c: b.l)
- 0 ~ ,
0 ~ -
..... C,)
.... r./) 0 =
s::: == c: ~
W ..... a;
e .s::: u ..... 0
, r:/; .....
(.) :-.. > - -0
aJ , c:
-
~ (1) - > C,) eI:) aJ
-c ...L.. r- ~ ..... aJ r:/; ~
- c: aJ
, 0 0 ..... -
-- - == ~ u c:
- a: 0 u - ~
ctS ..... 0 ~ 0
0- ..... c: ==
...... ""-'" ..... ~ u ~ s-
eI:) aJ a; 0 o-
s::: 0 == ,... -- eI:) >
- ~ QJ 0- E eI:)
(1) ~ ..... '"0 a; c:
- .
r- -
E en - ~ c: = 0 s- a;
~ s- O[) 0 ""0 .....
0 ... eI:) - aJ
- a; 0 s- C': c: ~
s::: 0 E 0- ~ ::: ~ ..c
- > QJ
0 0lJ ~ 0 E u ::: .....
c: - 0 c: ~ ..... eI:)
~ c: - ~
0- :... ..... a; OJ) a; - a;
-- cb eI:) ,... ~ c
> 0 - c'"O >
::: u a;
s::: . - 0- ~ u a; ..c: -- '"0 eI:) eI:) 0
0 - ..... ..... IIII'- a; '"0 a; ~
w ... C"i.: -- - > C.
::: ~ ~ >< 0 E
QJ Cltr¡ -- 0- .- = C"i.:
- = ~ ~ u:2
"Q ...-..
=.D .......
~ --
c: '-'
- QJ
-- . -- . . . .
~ ... ::
~
. ;> -- QJ
~ Q CQ
·
Tariff fOI" Electric Service
Texas Utilities Electric Company
Ühibit SJH-4
e
3.: General ServiclI
Applicablll: Entirll Syslem
EffllCllVII Dale:
Sh_: 14
PaJ' I of ¡
Revision: Original
3.2.14
Rider ET - Environmental Technology Service
Application
Applicable [0 IIlllctric service undllr Rale GS, Rale GP, or Rale HV for an environmentallechnololY havine an electrical load of 5 ItW or
more "'hen the availability of this rider "'II an importanl conrributin, factor in Customer'a makinr a decision to convert an uulinr proc...
usin, less energy-«fficient electric sources of energy or non-electrical sources of energy to a proceu utilizine etlerJY-etficient eJec:tric.l
technology, subject 10 the special conditions containlld herein. The availability of thia rider ia at the 101. discreQon of Company.
Applicable in con.iuncrion ",ith Rider ES. Not applicable in conjunction with any other rider. unl... specific.lly provided for h_in or in
such rider.
The pmvisions of General Service Rates GS. GP, or HV are modified only as shown herein.
Monthly Rate
In a.:.:ordan.:e ""itl! rhe renns oi General Service Rales GS. GP, or HV. except that the EnvironmentAl TechnololY Demand is reduced IS
fo 11o", s:
ü"irOtWleøta1 TecluJolugy DI!II1:a.Dd Discount
C "ntract Year Discount
I S5.00/\¡W
: s,¡.OO/kW
~ J S3.00/kW
,¡ S:.OO/\¡W
5 I SI.OO/kW
Definitions
Environmental Technology is the conversion to or installation of a ne'" process that yields a net reduction in the amount of source BTU
used. i.e.. thll amoun! of STU required for the process must be less for the ne.., technology procllSS than for the replaced rroceas. or a ne'"
process thae signiticantly improves thll qualiry oi the environment througl! use oi an electr;cal lechnolol)'. The Environmental Tcchnology
Deman..! is the eSllmated maximum IS-minute demand associated ",ith the energy-efficient electrical technology.
Special Conditions
All of the fOIl""'in, conditions must be met prior to service bein, rendered und.r this Rider:
I) Customer must furnish Company a notarized affidavit and supporting ¡nfonnetion contirmin, that Customer had kno"'ledge of the
existence of this Rider and an opportUnity 10 consider its benetits al least 60 days in advance of ma...ing a decision to convert
existin, processes to environmental technologies and prior to CUllomer' & first constnlction. purchase or lease of ne", or
addill"nal facilities or ooquipment necessary 10 convert to environmental technologies and that this Rider "'as an important
conlnbutin¡: faclor in Customer's decision to convert to the environmental technolOfY.
e
2) , An enerey efficiency analysIs of the plan& for the convenion to environmental technololY must be completed prior to the
installaClon of the conne"t..d load. Company ",ill perfonn luch analysis or rev;_ Customer's analysis. All reasonably
applicable. commercially available demand-side measures that "'ould reduce the need for electricity or that "'ould result in a more
..ffi"ient use of electricity "'ill be identified and explained 10 Customer. The requirement for this analysis ",ill be "'aived only if
Custumllr can d..monslrlle good cause for nOI having' the analysis perfonned. such as the use of proprietary rechnologies.
J¡
An A~r..emenl for EI..crric Service has be..n eJlecutlld.
Agreement
An A~reement for Ele"tric Service "'Ith I minimum lenn of five yurs is rooquired.
(c) 199'¡ T..us Utilities Electric Company
Rate Schedules :9.5
e
TV requests rate flexibility to attract, keep business
r,/1( 9d ·d· d· d . d I - ,
ByÐANPILLER l consl ermg expan 109 an re- mote economIc eve opment. decisions utilities are becoming
FonWonhSlar-Teleanm questing additional service, or The reasoning goes like this: If a more con~emed about their abil-
TU Electric, which serves Tar- leaving the area. . rate discount helps Tarrant C~un- ity to revise rates to meet outside
rant and 87 other counties, asked "Approval of the strategIc rate ty lure a corporate relocatIon, competition, TU spokesman Jim
the Texas Public Utility Commis- package will be a vital step in then that company wiII hire 10- Lawrence said.
sion yesterday for greater rate keeping this part of Texas com- cally or transfer employees into TU Electric bases rates for in-
flexibility, particularly to attract petitive in today's business envi-, the county. Those employees, in dustrial and commercial custom-
and keep business customers. ronment," TU Electric Vice Pres- turn, will create more demand for ers on peak demand. ThePU C
Among other requests, TU identTom.Baker~id.. electricity, boosting TU's rev- must approve any changes in in-
Electric asked for permission to Baker dId not gIve specIfic fig- enues. dividual rates.
grant rate discounts of up to 50 ures but said the new rates would Because utility rates, like taxes, "What can happen is that by
percent for companies that are generate revenues and help pro- can affect a company's location (More on ELECTRIC on Page 3)
.
Tuesday, June 7, 1994 / Fort Worth Star-Telegram I SectionB,Page3 I
Electric
From Page I
.
the time we go through the hearings
and procedures with the PUC, the
business has either left or has gone
to another state," Lawrence said.
If approved, the changes would
affect TU Electric's industrial, com-
mercial and wholesale customers,
which amount to about 51 percent
of the $5.4 billion in rates paid to the
·utility in 1993. The new rates would
not affect residential customers,
,who are about 89 percent of TU
Electric's 2.2 million customers.
The new rate package will need
PUC approval, which usually takes
several months. PUC Chairman
Robert Gee noted that other Texas
utilities, most notably Houston
Power & Light Co., already have
such economic development rates.
"If what they're asking for is what
has been represented to me, I can't
see that it is much different from
what other utilities already have,"
Gee said.
In addition to economic develop-
ment rates, TU Electric has asked
the commission for new rate catego-
ries for general service, for sales of
wholesale power to rural electric co-
operatives, and for companies in-
stalling new environmental technol-
ogy.
Lawrence said that TU would
give the business-rate discounts
only after the utility thoroughly
checks out a company's expansion
or relocation claims.
"We're not going to just grant
them without making sure that their
claims are legitimate," he said.
Among other things, a business
must have a peak draw of 200 kilo-
watts to qualify for the so-called
economic development rider dis-
counts.
The rate flexibility requested is
similar to that used by transporta-
tion providers for a decade or more.
Railroads and truckers, for in-
stance, have been able to adjust
rates to capture new business or
keep existing contracts.
.
STRA TEGIC RATE FILING
ST A TUS AS OF JULY 5, 1994
Cities Suspended 31
Cities Approving All 88
Cities With Action Tied To PUC 2
Cities Denying 1
.
Non-OJ Cities Supporting 6S
.
.
..................
Passed Final
..................
.
Aledo
Archer City
Balch Springs
Bellmead
Beverly Hills
Big Spring
Blue Mound
Breckenridge
Bridgeport
Buckingham
Cedar Hill
Chandler
Colorado City
Commerce
Cooper
Coppell
Crane
Crossroads
Decatur
DeLeon
DeSoto
Early
Eastland
Euless
Fate
Ferris
Florence
Forest Hill
Frisco
Glen Heights
Harker Heights
Henrietta
Holliday
Howe
Hudson Oaks
Iowa Park
Jacksboro
Lufkin
-
STRATEGIC RATE FILING
STATUS AS OF JULY 5, 1994
May Pearl
McLendon-Chisholm
Midlothian
Mineral Wells
Monahans
Murphy
Nolanville
Noonday
Northcrest
O'Donnell
Odessa
Palestine
Piano
Prosper
Ravenna
Red Oak
Roanoke
Robinson
Sachse
Saginaw
Seagoville
Stanton
Sunnyvale
Sweetwater
Trophy Club
Waxahachie
Westworth Village
White Settlement
Whitehouse
Willow Park
Wilmer
Wylie
..................
Passed First Reading
..................
Andrews
Bonham
Burkburnett
Electra
Ennis
Graham
Haltom City
Hurst
Irving
Keller
Lamesa
Mansfield
Mesquite
Midland
Paris
River Oaks
Round Rock
Snyder
STRATEGIC RATE FILING
STATUS AS OF JULY 5, 1994
.
································,....,.;,m<ds ~~t....."H····.·····O~W..¡O···.·····RI····.······ ··g···"'IA.T1ItRI· «S<D>I····~I<O·······~r...):). )....
::.>Y-+~p.. ......·..S...·..SuJN. ·......G· ····<S·· ···U·9.1··p<p·o<a<'J'·· ·····lNu~G··· ·ry;RES#"~O·.··· ··[.···.···U·····.· ·TI··d···O·'..aN.···<·;·i.<.f~}·H
······.A·.·..·.··.··...·... ............ ... ... ............. .. ... ........ .. .. ..... .. ·····d·.d···d.......
c."_'.-; -,' .: ',",. _,' _... .: :-:'. , ,:: .:- _': "',, _. ._ ',':' ','._ ."... .;.;.;.;.,<.:.....,.,..<.;...;...,.;-:.:.,.;.;.;..........
..:, '. ',-''; -':- ," :-;..< : - -:.- :',':',' .;.;. " ",'- ',. "-,';' .:. ,-._, :-:.>:.;.;.;.;.:-:.»:-;.:-:.......'.,
. '. . -. ........".,.
. ., " , " . ...., . .. .., . .. .. - - . . , . , , .. ,.......,..
.. ......, ",',.. ..", .. ,'..._,
.
Abbott
Alvarado
Angus
Anna
ADnona
Athens
Bangs
Barry
Blanket
Buckholts
Bynum
Cameron
Campbell
Caney City
Carbon
Clarksville
Comanche
Como
Corsicana
Crockett
Cushing
Dorchester
Elgin
Eustace
Golinda
Gorman
Gun Barrel City
Gunter
Holland
Hubbard
Hutto
Keene
Kerens
Lavon
Lorena
Mabank
Malakoff
Marquez
Marshall Creek
McGregor
Moody
Murchison
Nacogdoches
Nevada
Newark
Northlake
Oakwood
Oglesby
OviIIa
Payne Springs
Penelope
PflugerviIIe
Poynor
Ranger
Retreat
Rhome
Rockdale
Roxton
Savoy
Southmayd
Springtown
Streetman
Thrall
Trinidad
West
.
.
STRATEGIC RATE FILING
STATUS AS OF JULY 5, 1994
I
'd._.'.____,."...
...........,--.-.
........-...""..
.--.--...."......
.............. .........
..-.--........"....
.................'-.-..
....".--..............
........-..........
.......". ..........
.........:....'.....:.............................................'::.:..:..:...::....:..:..:..:..,.:.-.
..... " ..
..............",.....
......... ..,,-...
.............,,'.-.....
.....-..............
...............-.........
..........."."....
........."".......
.-...........,'..
,,-----.-,.......
..-- -....,.., "".",........ .'.....,.,.", .. ,- .... ..",-" ......... '-,"" ',--"'" '-- -',',',","
.--.._...,...,....'.....'.':.,'.','...'...'...',',.,.,.,..'..,.,...,..'.'.'.'.','.....'.'..'.'.'.'.'.. .-'...,.......,.,.,.-'..,'.'.'...'.....',',','..,-...,...,..-.-..........'....-.-..-..--.-..........
...-.-,-..._...,'.'....,,_.. ..."."""....,..,..,....,..".,..,..,.,.... --"""""""'..,.."".. .",..... .,'... ......"......
........C....·..·....~...WJ1'H;..ºklGINAIJ..JîJØtsöîJj.....Ö!
.. ... ·»><st1SPENÐING? ..... ..... .... .... .
.
Addison
Azle
Bedford
Belton
Benbrook
Brownwood
Burleson
Carrollton
Cleburne
Colleyville
Dallas
Dalworthington Gardens
Dennison
Dodd City
Farmers Branch
Flower Mound
Georgetown
Haslet
Lake Worth
Lindale
Oak Point
Pantego
Pottsboro
Richardson
Rockwall
Rowlett
Shennan
The Colony
Tyler
Wink
Wood way
~~~~I
...,............-...........
...........,.................
':':':':-:::':':':::'.':':':-:-:-:-:-:':-:':-:';':-:':-:
..... ..- ..................
...,.,.......................
i:!:!
.'
.
STRATEGIC RATE FILING
STATUS AS OF JULY 5, 1994
...........'............,'"""",..,.."....,......,"'.........
CmÊSWl'fâôRíôÎÑ.ÂÊåÛÌÛSôÎêTíÔN/:/::
.«);<>«>:::«»<~<~::.,,::":,.'::" "-.:,.,.,..:.:'::::>':::.'::: ."::".:::..-::».':: ,:,'.," >"'::::.:,<,\..::-:::.. ;" ..)<',.::: :,:::" .: ", .:: :': :':: :,:,:';'?:.::' ,,<:::.<}:<::::<::~::::::::::::.;:;:.:.:_::-.::-:-........;.:.;..".'
"""""""<""'/':""""'</'<::·:·::/::'Ä.:ÞoT>'r'AN. ·"oT>ŸW:b::mð·"ftU·'· Þ'1.ÞlTtYnN···· ,. '::::"""':::':':':""""::::':::::::",,::::::::::,:':::/::::::::',:
:.;:::;:~;:::::::::-::::::::::::::::;;::::::::::::::::::::;:;:::::;::::';::':;:;:::::::::ftL;:I.;::.i.:V ::. :::::::I.:~:::::::.::Q::::r:, :::,~::::d~::iI::.U: ;::',:~ :::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::;:;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:;:::::;:::::::::::::
... .... . . .... ... ..,. .., ..., "."....,., ... ."...,..:" .. '" ..... ,."""",:,:"::::,,,:,:::,:,:"/:':":':":::},,": ::":'::::::::1
I Sansom Park
Weatherford
Lakeside
.
".
t
,
II-
sro BY:
6-23-94 ;10:17AM
.....
95815516;# 2/ 2
IRVING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FO UNDA TrON
RESOLUTION 1993/94...4.
RECOMMENDATION TO TIlE CITY OF IRVING
Sù1'PORTlNG A PROPOSAL FROM TIJ ELECIRIC
TO PROVIDE INCENTIVES FOR QUALIFYING CUSTOMERS
WHEREAS,. the Irving Economic Development Foundation Serves as the primary agency
for attracting Dew businesses to the City of Irvil1g, and
WHER.EAS, commerce, business and jobs gravitate to the most economical1ocatioDs, and
WHEREAS, the IrviDg Economic Development Foundation wishes to suppon Tti Electric
. aod jt·s economic development efforts, aad
WHEREAS, the TU Electric proposal will allow them to retain existing buSinessesy attract
new Þusinesses, and encourage job creation by offering flexible rates, and
WHEREAS, the TU Electric proposal wiJl result in a higher efficieacy for aU TU Electric
customers.
NOW THBREFORE, BE IT RESOL VBD by the Board of Dircc:tors otthe IrVing
Economic Dc\'clopment Foundation that the Irving City Council suppon TU
Electric's filing before the State of Texas Public Utility COllunissioD for:
I. Offering new ratcs to qualified commercial, industrial and wholesale
eJectric Customers, and
2. IDCcDtives for qualifying customers wbo conven to advanced
technologies that conserve energy.
Adopted this 13th day of June. 1994 hy tbe Soard of Directol'5 of the Irving ECODomic
DeveJopmcnt FoundatiolL
~~,
Danie! B. Mab y
Executive Director
e
e
e
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - JUNE 27, - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting to order June 27, 1994 at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Tommy Brown
Mark Wood
Mack Garvin
Ray Oujesky
Byron Sibbet
Linda Spurlock
Mayor
Mayor Pro T em
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
C.A. Sanford
Randy Shiflet
Jeanette Rewis
Rex McEntire
Greg Dickens
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
City Engineer
Absent:
Lyle E. Welch
JoAnn Johnson
Councilman
Councilwoman
2.
INVOCATION
Councilman Sibbet gave the invocation.
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JUNE 13, 1994
APPROVED
e
June 27, 1994
Page 2
Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the minutes
of the June 13, 1994 meeting.
Motion carried 4-0; Councilwoman Spurlock abstaining due to absence from the
meeting.
5.
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING JUNE 16, 1994
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve the
minutes of the June 16,1994 meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
Mayor Brown moved Item No. 18 before Item No.6.
e
18.
GN 94-74 LEASE, CONSTRUCTION, AND JOINT-USE
AGREEMENTS BETWEEN BISD AND
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOR RECREA TION/A THLETIC FACILITIES
APPROVED
Mayor Brown explained the text of the agreement. Mayor Brown recognized BISD
School Board Members: Calvin White - President, Charles Scoma, Delores Webb, Kelly
Hancock, and John Spicer.
Mayor Pro Tem Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to approve GN
94-74.
Motion carried 5-0.
6.
PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
1. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BOND COMMITTEE REPORT
Mayor Brown gave a brief report on the Committee's recommendations and thanked the
Committee for their time and efforts on this project.
e Mr. Charles Owen gave a report on the Committee's recommendations.
·
e
e
June 27, 1994
Page 3
2. PARK AND RECREATION BOARD MINUTES
No action necessary.
7.
PRESENTATION OF "YARD OF THE MONTH" AWARDS
Mayor Brown and Beautification Committee Chairman Delores Pultz presented the
''Yard of the Month" awards for June to: Linda and Joe Wade, 6420 Diamond Loch
North; Marie and Donald Denney, 4209 Cummings; Dana and Tom Benton, 5616
Bogota; Kathy and Joe O'Donnell, 7500 Mike Court; Stephanie and Mike Rivera, 7820
Clark; Adria and Lee Metcalf, 7108 Oldham; Jill and John Spicer, 7725 Tamarron; The
Austin Family, 6332 Skylark; Linda and Freddie Rogers, 9128 Nob Hill Drive.
8.
PRESENTATION OF "LANDSCAPE OF THE MONTH" AWARD
Mayor Brown and Beautification Committee Chairman Delores Pultz presented the
"Landscape of the Month" award for June to Whataburger, 5200 Davis Boulevard.
9.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
Councilman Sibbet removed Item No. 17, Councilman Garvin removed Items No. 13
and 26 and Councilman Oujesky removed Item No. 19 from the Consent Agenda.
10.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(12,14,15,16,18,20,21,22,23,24,25,&27)
APPROVED
Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the Consent
Agenda.
Motion carried 5-0.
11.
PZ 94-09 - PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING -
REQUEST OF MARSHALL CURRY FOR A SPECIAL USE
PERMIT FOR A PERSONAL CARE HOME ON LOT 13,
BLOCK 7, NORTH HILLS ADDITION
ORDINANCE NO. 1990
APPROVED
e
e
e
June 27, 1994
Page 4
Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in
favor of the request to come forward.
Mr. Marshall Curry, applicant, appeared before the Council and spoke in favor of the
request.
Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to the request to come
forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing.
Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve Ordinance
No. 1990.
Motion carried 5-0.
*12.
PS 94-18 - REQUEST OF RICHLAND HILLS CHURCH OF CHRIST
FOR REPLAT OF BLOCK 7, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION
APPROVED
13.
GN 94-68 - GARBAGE BILLING FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve GN 94-68
with a ten percent billing fee and to also include commercial.
Motion carried 5-0.
*14.
GN 94-70 - COMMUNITY SERVICES - REORGANIZATION
APPROVED
*15.
GN 94-71 - APPROPRIATION FOR TRA DEBT SERVICE -
WALKER/CALLOWAY SEWER PROJECT
APPROVED
e
.
.
June 27, 1994
Page 5
*16.
GN 94-72 -INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR RADIO MAINTENANCE
RESOLUTION NO. 94-28
APPROVED
*17.
GN 94-73 - ORDINANCE APPROVING TU ELECTRIC'S
FOUR PROPOSED NEW TARIFFS
ORDINANCE NO. 1992
TABLED
Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to table Ordinance
No. 1992 until the July 11, 1994 Council meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
18.
GN 94-74 - LEASE, CONSTRUCTION, AND JOINT-USE
AGREEMENTS BElWEEN BISD AND NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS FOR RECREATION/ATHLETIC FACILITIES
Moved before Item No.6 on the Agenda.
19.
PU 94-48 - LAND ACQUISITION - LITTLE BEAR CREEK PHASE II
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Wood abstained from discussion.
Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve PU 94-48.
Motion carried 4-0; Mayor Pro Tem Wood abstaining.
*20.
PU 94-49 - RATIFY PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FOR
CITY HALL EXPANSION PROJECT - LOT 8, BLOCK 32,
RICHLAND TERRACE ADDITION
APPROVED
·
e
-
June 27, 1994
Page 6
*21.
PU 94-50 - AWARD BID FOR MID-SIZE SEDAN
APPROVED
*22.
PU 94-51 - AWARD OF BID FOR RICHFIELD PARK IRRIGATION
APPROVED
*23.
PU 94-52 - AWARD OF BID FOR ADVENTURE
WORLD RESTROOM BUILDING
APPROVED
*24.
PW 94-21 - APPROVE REIMBURSEMENT TO ARCO FOR PIPELINE
ADJUSTMENTS ON STRUMMER DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS
RESOLUTION NO. 94-27
APPROVED
*25.
PW 94-22 - AWARD OF BID FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION
AT WATAUGA ROAD AND TECNOL BOULEVARD
APPROVED
26.
PAY 94-12 - APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 18
IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,615.68 TO J.L. BERTRAM
CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING, INC. FOR BURSEY
ROAD PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve PAY 94-12,
funds to be transferred from Unspecified Street Fund instead of Unspecified Drainage
Fund.
Motion carried 5-0.
e
e
e
June 27, 1994
Page 7
*27.
PAY 94-13 - APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 11
IN THE AMOUNT OF $123,197.86 TO ORVAL HALL
EXCAVATING CO. FOR CALLOWAY BRANCH CHANNEL
IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II-B
APPROVED
28.
CITIZENS PRESENTATION
Reverend Steve Bontrager representing North Richland Hills Four Square Church,
appeared before the Council. Reverend Bontrager advised they wanted to build a new
church at Buck and Meadow Road. Reverend Bontrager asked the Council to waive
the requirement for the reconstruction of Buck Street and accept a letter of intent for
future improvements of Holiday Lane and a cost share between the City and Church for
the water line, the Church to pay one-third for the water line.
Councilman Garvin advised the City had previously been requested to waive these
requirements and denied the request. Councilman Garvin stated he would encourage
the Council to deny the request.
Mr. Claude Shackelford appeared before the Council. Mr. Shackelford advised he
would like permission from the Council to circulate a petition on requiring harsher
penalties for convicted drug dealers.
Mayor Brown advised that Attorney McEntire would check the wording of the petition
and notify Mr. Shackelford of his decision.
Mr. David Johnson, 7345 Plumwood, appeared before the Council. Mr. Johnson stated
he had been advised by the City that his street did not meet the criteria for speed
humps. Mr. Johnson asked that the Council review the ordinance and see if exceptions
could be made. Mr. Johnson advised the residents were willing to pay for the
installation of the speed humps.
Councilman Oujesky asked if 100 percent of the residents wanted the speed humps.
Mr. Johnson advised only four residents did not sign the petition.
e
e
e
June 27, 1994
Page 8
Mayor Brown advised Mr. Johnson that Staff would review the ordinance and if
changes needed to be made, it would be placed on an agenda for formal action.
Mr. Jerry Long, 4713 Hillside Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Long stated that
two off-duty police officers came to his house on June 21 st at approximately 11 :30 p.m.
to serve a warrant on his nephew. They rang the door bell several times and also
kicked on the door. They advised his wife to pay the warrant or he would be taken to
jail. The officers could not produce a copy of the warrant. Mr. Long stated he felt this
was unacceptable behavior and that the Council should review the Court procedures.
Mayor Brown advised Mr. Long that the City Manager would investigate the situation
and get in touch with him.
29.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting.
Tommy Brown - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
Department: Planning and Inspections
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
.,
~
Council Meeting Date:
7/11/94
Subject:
Request of James R. Harris Company for Final Plat of Agenda Number:
Shady Oaks Addition, Phase 2. (Located in the 8200 block of North Tarrant Parkway)
PS 94-19
James R. Harris is the owner and developer ofa parcel ofland located on the north side of North Tarrant Parkway, about 1/4 mile
west of Castle Creek Drive. He has submitted a Final Plat of the property which he proposes to develop in phases. This Final Plat is
Phase 2. The Preliminary Plat of this property was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 10, 1994. The
Final Plat is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat.
The following are the issues regarding this Final Plat:
1. Sidewalks are required along all public streets as the individual lot develops. The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval of the owners request that the sidewalk requirement be waived for the portion of this property that fronts
North Tarrant Parkway.
2. The Subdivision Regulations require a masonry screening wall along those lots that have frontage on North Tarrant Parkway.
A screening wall is required on all residential lots that have frontage on a C4U or larger roadway. The developer has agreed to
construct the masonry screening wall as required.
3. The Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended that the developer be required to escrow funds for the future
improvement of North Tarrant Parkway. The developer did not include any plans to construct North Tarrant Parkway along this
route in his original engineering plans.
The developer has responded to all engineering comments. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at its June
23, 1994 meeting and recommended approval subject to the following requirements: engineering comments, a waiver of the sidewalk
requirement along North Tarrant Parkway, and that the developer provide escrow money for future improvements to North Tarrant
Parkway.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
16
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
-
-
¡efl~
City Manager
. Finance Director
~
partment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
.
General Information
A. Owner
B. Developer
C. Engineer
D. Surveyor
E. Acreage
F. No. of Lots
G. Zoning
H. Prop. Use
Water and Sewer
A. Lines
. B. Fire Coverage
Streets and Thoroughfares
A. Thor. Plan
B. Improvements
C. Extensions
D. New Streets
E. Street Lights
F. Access
G. Sidewalks
H. Screening Walls
.
I. New Street Names
Subdivision Plat Review Fact Sheet
Case Number PS 94-19
Shady Oaks Associates, L.P., Ft Worth TX
James R. Harris Company, Ft Worth TX
Carter & Burgess Engineers, Dallas, TX
same
16.543 acres
52
R-2 Single Family Residential
Single Family Residences
The developer will install the necessary water and sewer lines to serve the proposed lots.
The developer will install the necessary frre hydrants to provide the required frre protection for
this property.
This property fronts on North Tarrant Parkway, a P6D Principal Arterial, requiring an ultimate
right-of-way of 120 feet.
None required.
None.
Four new residential streets are proposed.
The developer will install the necessary street lights according to Public Works criteria.
Access to this property is from North Tarrant Parkway.
Sidewalks are required on all lots as each individual lot develops. The sidewalk constructed along
North Tarrant Parkway must be installed at the time the masonry screening wall is constructed.
A masonry screening wall is required along those lots that have frontage along North Tarrant
Parkway. The Subdivision Regulations require a masonry screening wall along roads classifred as
a C4U or larger.
Shady Oaks Drive, Worthshire Drive, Berkshire Drive, Beverly Drive
Drainage
A. Flood Plain
B. Improvements
C. Easements
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
A. Consistency
B. Special Issues
According to Flood Insurance Rate Maps, a portion of this property lies within a lOO-year flood
plain.
Several offsite drainage improvements are being made to accommodate this development.
None.
This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan that calls for low density single
family residential development in this area.
None.
.
N@RTH
RICH LAND
HILLS
Public Works
June 1, 1994
MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Mike Curtis, P.E.
Staff Engineer
SUBJECT: PS 94-21; SHADY OAKS SECOND PHASE;
Final Plat & Construction Plans
.
I have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on May 4, 1994 and offer the
following comments:
1. A vicinity map needs to be added to the plat. Sufficient street names and landmarks need
to be included to determine the general location of the plat.
2. The title block needs to be revised as shown.
3. The City has obtained a Global Positioning System (GPS) Horizontal Control Survey.
This survey was accomplished to create an accurate base map for the Geographical
Information System. City policy requires that all new plats be tied by survey to the GPS.
This will allow the City to keep the GIS up-to-date. The Public Works Department has
written descriptions for all of the GPS Benchmarks located around the City. The final plat
needs to include the NAD83 Texas State Plane Coordinates (in feet) for at least two
property corners. The coordinates need to be determined by a survey tied to the City's
GPS monuments.
4. The metes and bounds description and the exhibit are not in agreement. The discrepancy
occurs in the eleventh call. This needs to be resolved.
5. The attached easement dedication needs to be incorporated into the closing paragraph after
the metes and bounds description.
.
7301 N.E. Loo" 820 P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 USA
(817) 581-5521 FAX (817) 656.7503
6. A twenty foot radius will be required at the beginning of all cul-de-sacs as shown on the
review plans.
7. The current wning needs to be clearly indicated on the face of the plat. This includes the
proposed lots and the adjacent lots.
8. An offsite drainage easement is required along the east property line of Lots 24-28. All
offsite easements and exhibits need to be prepared and forwarded to the Public Works
Department for review. The signed easements need to be transmitted tot he Public Works
Department for filing with the approved final plat.
9. Street lighting is required by Section 1-06 of the Design Manual. The locations of any
existing street lights need to be shown on the plans to confirm compliance with current
ordinances. In addition, a street lighting plan will need to be added to the construction
plans. Any additional street lights which may be required based on current ordinances
need to be coordinated with Public Works and TU Electric. The cost for installation of
any additional street lights will be paid by the developer directly to TU Electric.
10. The Design Manual contains criteria for necessary fire hydrant coverage. Appropriate
coverage radii for the applicable fire hydrants will need to be included. This will assist
Public Works in determining the need for additional fire hydrants.
11. Currently, North Tarrant Parkway is an unimproved street. An escrow may need to be
established for future paving improvements.
12. The Subdivision Regulations require screen walls for all newly platted or replatted
subdivisions adjacent to a C4U thoroughfare or larger. The requirements for the screening
wall can be found in the Subdivision Regulations under the subtitle of Special Provisions.
In addition, the Zoning Ordinance requires visibility sight triangles at street intersections.
See Article 6 in the Zoning Ordinance for the requirements.
13. The 15 foot utility easement and drainage easement between Lots 15 and 16 needs to be
changed to 22 foot utility easement and drainage easement.
14. An onsite sanitary sewer easement by separate document will be required along North
Tarrant Parkway, across the back of Lots 16, 27 and 28. The volume and page for the
offsite sanitary sewer easement will need to be shown on the plat.
15. There are comments regarding the engineering and construction plans recorded on a set
of bluelines. The review plans have been returned to the engineer for revision. The
comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer of his
responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans.
.
.
.
The City 1 S eventual approval of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility
by the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. Public Works is
recommending that this plat and construction plans be revised prior to submitting to the Planning
& Zoning Commission. The marked up bluelines need to be returned with the next submittal.
JV1:L w-.,
RMC/smm/pwm94060
cc: Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works
Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning & Inspection Services
C:-Æ Carter:: Burgess
Consultants in Engineering, Architecture,
Planning and the Environment
June 15, 1994
Mr. Mike Curtis
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Reference:
PS94-21 Shady Oaks, Second Phase
Dear Mike:
We have received your comments on the above referenced plat and respond as
follows:
1. A vicinity map has been added.
2. The title block has been revised.
3. The GPS coordinates have been added.
4. The calls have been adjusted.
5. The easement dedication was added.
6. The cul-de-sac radius was changed.
7. The current zoning was added.
8. Offsite easements are being prepared at this time.
9. The street light plan is being prepared at this time.
10. The hydrant radii are being added.
11. Based on previous discussions, we understand no escrow is required. If
this is contrary to your understanding, please let me know.
12. The screening wall will be installed as part of the subdivision
improvements.
13. We will insert the easement width needed on the plat prior to filing.
14. The easement information will be shown on the plat prior to filing.
15. Comments will be addressed as necessary.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
CARTER & BURGESS, INC.
S w~
Te7;y wI Mitchell, P.E.
Associate Principal
TWM/dmk
93317901.L05
cc: Mr. Clayton Husband
Mr. Jim Harris
Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elmbrook Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75247-4951
(214) 638-0145 Metro (214) 263-2019 Fox (214) 638-0447
.
.
.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
INSTALLATION OF NEW
MEMBER
PRESENT
Chairman
Members
MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF TH
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
June 23, 1994 - 7:30 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by Chairm
Director Plan/lnsp
Planner
Plans Examiner
ABSENT
James Broc
Victor Ba
Don Bo
Ron L
Rich
Ba LeBaron
yton Husband
regory Arrington
David Barfield
Paul Miller
Mr. Richa Davis was sworn in as a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission and
Capital I provements Advisory Committee.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
OF JUNE 9, 1994 Mr. owen made the motion to approve the minutes as presented. The motion was
s onded by Mr. Baxter, and the motion carried 5-0, with Mr. Davis abstaining due to
PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS
1. PS 94- 1 9
Request of James R. Harris Company for Final Plat of Shady Oaks Addition, Phase 2. This
property is located in the 8200 block of North Tarrant Parkway.
Chairman Brock stated that Mr. Harris has three plats being considered tonight, and the
Commission will consider each one individually.
Mr. Terry Mitchell, with Carter & Burgess Engineers, 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Dallas, came
forward to represent the owner. He stated this plat consists of 52 lots. He stated they have
addressed all staff comments. He stated he would answer any questions the Commission
might have.
Chairman Brock stated it is the opinion of the Commission to waive the sidewalks along
North Tarrant Parkway only. He stated there is some question regarding escrow along North
Tarrant Parkway.
Mr. LeBaron stated that when North Tarrant Parkway was planned, it was assumed that the
construction of the road would be done by some other body rather than the City. He stated
that escrow for paving improvement along North Tarrant Parkway have been waived for
other developments. He stated the Commission could consider starting to require escrow
along this roadway.
Mr. Mitchell stated the developer has spoken with staff many months ago and was told there
may be an escrow, but a definite yes or no answer was ever given. He stated an agreement
PZ Minutes - Page 2
June 23, 1994
was signed between the county and the owners of the property that the county would in' 'I
the road upon dedication of right-of-way without assessing any property owners. He sta.
the developer would take exception to any escrow at this time.
Mr. Lueck asked if staff has a copy of that agreement.
Mr. LeBaron stated no. He stated that only one development has been final platted along
this roadway at this time.
Mr. Doug Long, 1615 Precinct Line Road, came forward to speak. He stated he was the one
who dedicated the right-of-way to the county, and the document states the county would
build the road. He stated the property was not deeded to the public but to the county. Mr.
Long stated the city could not go in and build the road at this time because the land is
owned by the county.
Mr. Davis asked if they have done that.
Mr. Long stated the document states the county will build the road. He stated that if the
county's obligation is not met, they could ask for the right-of-way back, but they do not
intend to do that. He stated there are some hang-ups in the acquiring of some of the right-of-
way. He stated they gave up thirty-five acres.
Mr. Lueck stated he did not know if the county had pulled out of building the road.
Mr. Davis stated the county built a road.
Mr. Long stated the county built a temporary roadway to move traffic at this point. He ~ 1
they are approaching the State to construct the road. He stated he will provide a copy ot me
documents to the city.
Mr. Davis stated that road could stay like that for several years. He stated the owners could
be assessed unless money is placed in escrow up front.
Mr. Husband stated the tax records indicate that the property is not dedicated as public right-
of-way but as tracts of land owned by Tarrant County.
Mr. Davis stated the Council should decide if they want to waive the escrow.
Chairman Brock asked if the developer has agreed to all other engineering comments.
Mr. Mitchell stated yes.
Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PS 94-19 subject to engineering comments, a waiver
of sidewalks along North Tarrant Parkway only, and that the Council decide if escrow is
required along North Tarrant Parkway. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. The
motion carried 5-0.
2. PS 94-20
Chairman
exception of si
improvements.
asked if the developer has agreed to all engineering comments with the
ks along North Tarrant Parkway and escrow of funds for paving
is located in the 8200 block of North Tarrant Parkway.
Mr. Mitchell stated yes.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning and Inspections
- Council Meeting Date:
7/11/94
SUbject:
Request of James R. Harris Compan.y for Final Plat of Agenda Number:
Shady Oaks Addition, Phase 3. (Located in the 8200 block of North Tarrant Parkway)
PS 94-20
James R. Harris is the owner and developer of a parcel of land located on the north side of North Tarrant Parkway, about 1/4 mile
west of Castle Creek Drive. He has submitted a Final Plat of the property which he proposes to develop in phases. This Final Plat is
Phase 3. The Preliminary Plat of this property was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 10, 1994. The
Final Plat is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat.
The following are the issues regarding this Final Plat:
1. Sidewalks are required along all public streets as the individual lot develops. The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval of the owners request that the sidewalk requirement be waived for the portion of this property that fronts
North Tarrant Parkway.
2. The Subdivision Regulations require a masonry screening wall along those lots that have frontage on North Tarrant Parkway.
A screening wall is required on all residential lots that have frontage on a C4U or larger roadway. The developer has agreed to
construct the masonry screening wall as required.
3. The Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended that the developer be required to escrow funds for the future
improvement of North Tarrant Parkway. The developer did not include any plans to construct North Tarrant Parkway along this
route in his original engineering plans.
The developer has responded to all engineering comments. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at its June
23, 1994 meeting and recommended approval subject to the following requirements: engineering comments, a waiver of the sidewalk
requirement along North Tarrant Parkway, and that the developer provide escrow money for future improvements to North Tarrant
Parkway.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
gr:;~ting Budget L ttJ-- - -:e
'ß ~rtmen~.ture ;P ft~'Mân.it
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance DIrector
Page 1 of
.
General Information
A. Owner
B. Developer
C. Engineer
D. Surveyor
E. Acreage
F. No. of Lots
G. Zoning
H. Prop. Use
Water and Sewer
A. Lines
.
B. Fire Coverage
Streets and Thoroughfares
A. Thor. Plan
B. Improvements
C. Extensions
D. New Streets
E. Street Lights
F. Access
G. Sidewalks
H. Screening Walls
.
I. New Street Names
Subdivision Plat Review Fact Sheet
Case Number PS 94-20
Shady Oaks Associates, L.P., Ft Worth TX
James R. Harris Company, Ft Worth TX
Carter & Burgess Engineers, Dallas, TX
same
15.781 acres
54
R-2 Single Family Residential
Single Family Residences
The developer will install the necessary water and sewer lines to serve the proposed lots.
The developer will install the necessary fIre hydrants to provide the required fIre protection for
this property.
This property £ronts on North Tarrant Parkway, a P6D Principal Arterial, requiring an ultimate
right-of-way of 120 feet.
None required.
None.
Four new residential streets are proposed.
The developer will install the necessary street lights according to Public Works criteria.
Access to this property is £rom North Tarrant Parkway.
Sidewalks are required on all lots as each individual lot develops. The sidewalk constructed along
North Tarrant Parkway must be installed at the time the masonry screening wall is constructed.
A masonry screening wall is required along those lots that have frontage along North Tarrant
Parkway. The Subdivision Regulations require a masonry screening wall along roads classifIed as
a C4U or larger.
Shady Oaks Drive, Beverly Drive, Parkdale Drive, Grand View Drive
Drainage
A. Flood Plain
B. Improvements
C. Easements
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
A. Consistency
B. Special Issues
According to Flood Insurance Rate Maps, a portion of this property lies within a IOO-year floop
plain.
Several offsite drainage improvements are being made to accommodate this development.
None.
This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan that calls for low density single
family residential development in this area.
None.
.
N®RTH
RICH LAND
HILLS
Public Works
June 1, 1994
MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Mike Curtis, P.E.
Staff Engineer
SUBJECT: PS 94-21; SHADY OAKS THIRD PHASE;
Final Plat & Construction Plans
.
I have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on May 4, 1994 and offer the
following comments:
1. A vicinity map needs to be added to the plat. Sufficient street names and landmarks need
to be included to determine the general location of the plat.
2. The title block needs to be revised as shown.
3. The City has obtained a Global Positioning System (GPS) Horizontal Control Survey.
This survey was accomplished to create an accurate base map for the Geographical
Information System. City policy requires that all new plats be tied by survey to the GPS.
This will allow the City to keep the GIS up-to-date. The Public Works Department has
written descriptions for all of the GPS Benchmarks located around the City. The final plat
needs to include the NAD83 Texas State Plane Coordinates (in feet) for at least two
property corners. The coordinates need to be determined by a survey tied to the City's
GPS monuments.
4. The attached easement dedication needs to be incorporated into the closing paragraph after
the metes and bounds description.
5. The current zoning needs to be clearly indicated on the face of the plat. This includes the
proposed lots and the adjacent lots.
.
7301 N.E. Loo~ 820 P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 USA
(817) 581-5521 FAX (817) 656-7503
6. Street lighting is required by Section 1-06 of the Design Manual. The locations of any
existing street lights need to be shown on the plans to confirm compliance with current
ordinances. In addition, a street lighting plan will need to be added to the construction
plans. Any additional street lights which may be required based on current ordinances
need to be coordinated with Public Works and TU Electric. The cost for installation of
any additional street lights will be paid by the developer directly to TU Electric.
7. The Design Manual contains criteria for necessary fire hydrant coverage. Appropriate
coverage radii for the applicable fire hydrants will need to be included. This will assist
Public Works in determining the need for additional fire hydrants.
8. Please be aware that the Environmental Protection Agency requires all construction sites
of 5 acres or more to acquire a "construction storm water permit". The City will need a
copy of your permit when acquired and/or your "Notice of Intent" (NOI) for our files.
9. Currently, North Tarrant Parkway is an unimproved street. An escrow may need to be
established for future paving improvements.
10. There are comments regarding the engineering and construction plans recorded on a set
of bluelines. The review plans have been returned to the engineer for revision. The
comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer of his
responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans. The City's
eventual approval of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility by
the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. Public Works
is recommending that this plat and construction plans be revised prior to submitting to the
Planning & Zoning Commission. The marked up bluelines need to be returned with the
next submittal.
~D C-~
C/smm/pwm94064
cc: Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works
Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning & Inspection Services
... Carter· Burgess
Consultants in Engineering, Architecture,
Planning and the Environment
June 15, 1994
Mr. Mike Curtis
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Reference: PS94-21 Shady Oaks, Third Phase
Dear Mike:
We have received your comments on the above referenced plat and respond as
follows:
.
10.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
A vicinity map has been added.
The title block has been revised.
The GPS coordinates have been added.
The easement dedication was added.
The current zoning was added.
The street light plan is being prepared at this time.
The hydrant radii are being added.
The NOI will be sent, as requested.
Based on previous discussions, we understand no escrow is required. If
this is contrary to your understanding, please let me know.
Comments will be addressed as necessary.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
CARTER & BURGESS, INC.
~ /'l,v ~
Terry W. ~itchell, P.E.
Associate Principal
TWM/dmk
93317901.L06
.
cc:
Mr. Clayton Husband
Mr. Jim Harris
Carter & Burgess, Inc. 7950 Elmbrook Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75247.4951
(214) 638-0145 Metro (214) 263·2019 Fax (214) 638-0447
PZ Minutes - Page 2
June 23, 1994
was signed between the county and the owners of the property that the county would ir
the road upon dedication of right-of-way without assessing any property ow rs. He sta,_ -
the developer would take exception to any escrow at this time.
'I
Mr. LeBaron stated no. He stated that only one development has
this roadway at this time.
n final platted along
Mr. Lueck asked if staff has a copy of that agreement.
Mr. Doug Long, 1615 Precinct Line Road, came forward to s ak. He stated he was the one
who dedicated the right-of-way to the county, and the doc ent states the county would
build the road. He stated the property was not deeded to e public but to the county. Mr.
Long stated the city could not go in and build the road his time because the land is
owned by the county.
Mr. Davis asked if they have done that.
Mr. Long stated the document states the count)¡ ill build the road. He stated that if the
county's obligation is not met, they could as r the right-of-way back, but they do not
intend to do that. He stated there are some ng-ups in the acquiring of some of the right-of-
way. He stated they gave up thirty-five ac s.
Mr. Lueck stated he did not know if th ounty had pulled out of building the road.
Mr. Long stated the county buil temporary roadway to move traffic at this point. He ~ j
they are approaching the Stat 0 construct the road. He stated he will provide a copy of the
documents to the city.
Mr. Davis stated the county built a
Mr. Davis stated that ro could stay like that for several years. He stated the owners could
be assessed unless mo y is placed in escrow up front.
he tax records indicate that the property is not dedicated as public right-
of land owned by Tarrant County.
the Council should decide if they want to waive the escrow.
Chairman rock asked if the developer has agreed to all other engineering comments.
Mr avis made the motion to approve PS 94-19 subject to engineering comments, a waiver
o idewalks along North Tarrant Parkway only, and that the Council decide if escrow is
quired along North Tarrant Parkway. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. The
2. PS 94-20
Request of James R. Harris Company for Final Plat of Shady Oaks Addition, Phase 3. This
property is located in the 8200 block of North Tarrant Parkway.
Chairman Brock asked if the developer has agreed to all engineering comments with the
exception of sidewalks along North Tarrant Parkway and escrow of funds for paving
improvements.
Mr. Mitchell stated yes.
.
.
.
PZ Minutes - Page 3
June 23, 1994
Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PS 94-19 subject to engineering comments, a waiver
of sidewalks along North Tarrant Parkway only, and that the Council decide if escrow is
required along North Tarrant Parkway. The motion was seconded by Mr. Baxter.
Mr. LeBaron asked if the Commission could make a recommendation to either waive or
impose the requirement of escrow so that the City Council can act on the recommendation
and discuss it if necessary. He stated the item could be placed on the consent agenda for the
Councilor taken off if necessary.
Mr. Davis amended his motion to impose the requirement of escrow for North Tarrant
Parkway improvements. The amended motion was seconded by Mr. Baxter. The motion
carried 3-2, with Mr. Davis, Mr. Baxter, and Mr. Bowen voting for, and Mr. Lueck and
Chairman Brock voting against.
Mr. Davis made the motion to amend PS 94-19 to incorporate the same language included
in PS 94-20. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. The motion carried 3-2, with Mr.
Davis, Mr. Baxter, and Mr. Bowen voting for, and Mr. Lueck and Chairman Brock voting
against.
Mr. Mitchell asked if the Council has the authority to assess to not to assess based on that
recommendation.
Chairman Brock stated yes.
Mr. Baxter asked staff for an update regarding the future of North Tarrant Parkway and the
legality of requiring escrow on this roadway at the next meeting. He stated there will
probably be many more plat come up in the future and some policy is needed in these areas.
Mr. Bowen stated that if the Commission errors on this requirement, it is an error on the side
of caution.
3. PS 94-21
erty is located in the 8200 block of North Tarrant Parkway.
Brock asked if the developer has agreed to all engineering comments.
re is a requirement for escrow for Shady Grove Road.
alks will be built by the builder.
Mr. Baxter made the motion to ap ve PS 94-21 subject to engineering comments and
escrow of funds for Shady Grove Roa The motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. The
motion carried 5-0.
4. PS 94-22
Request of H.T. Apartments for Amended Plat at 1, Block 2, Tapp Addition. This
property is located at 6424 Industrial Park Boulev
Chairman Brock stated this plat is a housecleaning issu clear up an encroachment of a
parking lot on a lot line. He stated all comments have bee ddressed.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 94-22.
The motion carried 5-0.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning and Inspections
- Council Meeting Date:
7/11/94
SUbject:
Request of James R. Harris Company for Final Plat of Agenda Number:
Shady Oaks Addition, Phase 4. (Located in the 8200 block of North Tarrant Parkway)
PS 94-21
James R. Harris is the developer of a parcel of land located on the north side of North Tarrant Parkway, approximately 1/4 mile west
of Castle Creek Drive.. He has submitted a Final Plat of the property which he proposes to develop in phases. This Final Plat is
Phase 4. The Preliminary Plat of this property was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 10, 1994. The
Final Plat is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat.
The following are the issues regarding this Final Plat:
1. Sidewalks are required along all public streets as the individual lot develops.
2. A portion ofthis property fronts Shady Grove Road, classified as a C2U on the Master Thoroughfare Plan, which requires an
ultimate right-of-way of 60 feet. The developer is dedicating approximately 8 additional feet of right-of-way for the future
improvement of Shady Grove Road. The developer is also placing money in escrow for future improvements to a portion of
Shady Grove Road.
The developer has responded to all engineering comments. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this Final Plat at its
June 23, 1994 meeting and recommended approval subject to engineering comments and escrow of funds for Shady Grove Road.
RECOMMENDA nON:
It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Ot~~bm~~,gnatur. ~ ¡e 11.~
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
.
General Information
A. Owner
B. Developer
C. Engineer
D. Surveyor
E. Acreage
F. No. of Lots
G. Zoning
H. Prop. Use
Water and Sewer
A. Lines
.
B. Fire Coverage
Streets and Thoroughfares
A. Thor. Plan
B. Improvements
C. Extensions
D. New Streets
E. Street Lights
F. Access
G. Sidewalks
H. Screening Walls
I. New Street Names
.
Subdivision Plat Review Fact Sheet
Case Number PS 94-21
Shady Oaks Associates, L.P., Ft Worth TX
James R. Harris Company, Ft Worth TX
Carter & Burgess Engineers, Dallas, TX
same
6.165 acres
17
R-2 Single Family Residential
Single Family Residences
The developer will install the necessary water and sewer lines to serve the proposed lots.
The developer wilJ install the necessary fire hydrants to provide the required fire protection for
this property.
This property has frontage on Shady Grove Road, a C2U Minor Collector, requiring an ultimate
right-of-way of 60 feet.
The developer is required to provide for the future improvement to his property's frontage on
Shady Grove Road.
None.
One new street is proposed.
The developer wilJ install the necessary street lights according to Public Works criteria.
Access to this property is from Shady Grove Road.
Sidewalks are required on all lots as each individual lot develops.
None required.
Grand View Drive
Drainage
A. Flood Plain
B. Improvements
C. Easements
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
A. Consistency
B. Special Issues
According to Flood Insurance Rate Maps, a portion of this property lies within a 100-year flood
plain.
Several offsite drainage improvements are being made to accommodate this development.
A drainage easement may be required between Lots 1 and 17 in Block 3 depending upon the final
ditch location and design.
This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan that calls for low density single
family residential development in this area.
None.
. . J .
.
N®R.TH
R.ICHLAND
HILLS
Public Works
June 1, 1994
MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Mike Curtis, P.E.
Staff Engineer
SUBJECT: PS 94-21; SHADY OAKS FOURTH PHASE;
Final Plat & Construction Plans
.
I have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on May 4, 1994 and offer the
following comments:
1. A vicinity map needs to be added to the plat. Sufficient street names and landmarks need
to be included to determine the general location of the plat.
2. The title block needs to be revised as shown.
3. The City has obtained a Global Positioning System (GPS) Horizontal Control Survey.
This survey was accomplished to create an accurate base map for the Geographical
Infonnation System. City policy requires that all new plats be tied by survey to the GPS.
This will allow the City to keep the GIS up-to-date. The Public Works Department has
written descriptions for all of the GPS Benchmarks located around the City. The final plat
needs to include the NAD83 Texas State Plane Coordinates (in feet) for at least two
property comers. The coordinates need to be determined by a survey tied to the City's
GPS monuments.
4. The attached easement dedication needs to be incorporated into the closing paragraph after
the metes and bounds description.
5. The current zoning needs to be clearly indicated on the face of the plat. This includes the
proposed lots and the adjacent lots.
.
7301 N.E. Loop 820 P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 USA
(817) 581-5521 FAX (817) 656-7503
6. Street lighting is required by Section 1-06 of the Design Manual. The locations of any
existing street lights need to be shown on the plans to confirm compliance with current
ordinances. In addition, a street lighting plan will need to be added to the construction
plans. Any additional street lights which may be required based on current ordinances
need to be coordinated with Public Works and TU Electric. The cost for installation of
any additional street lig~ts will be paid by the developer directly to TU Electric.
7. The Design Manual contains criteria for necessary fire hydrant coverage. Appropriate
coverage radii for the applicable fire hydrants will need to be included. This will assist
Public Works in determining the need for additional fire hydrants.
8. Shady Grove Road is designated as a C2U on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. This
designation requires a 60 foot ultimate right-of-way. Additional right-of-way dedication
may be required for this street. However, before it can be determined how much
dedication is required the existing right-of-way for Shady Grove Road will need to be tied
down. Iron pins will need to be located on both sides of the street.
9. Please be aware that the Environmental Protection Agency requires all construction sites
of 5 acres or more to acquire a "construction storm water permit". The City will need a
copy of your permit when acquired and/or your "Notice of Intent" (NOI) for our files.
10. Currently, Shady Grove Road is an unimproved street. An escrow may need to be
established.
11. A drainage easement may be required on Lots 1 and 17, Block 3, depending on the final
ditch location and design.
12. There are comments regarding the engineering and construction plans recorded on a set
of bluelines. The review plans have been returned to the engineer for revision. The
comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer of his
responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans. The City's
eventual approval of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility by
the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. Public Works
is recommending that this plat and construction plans be revised prior to submitting to the
Planning & Zoning Commission. The marked up bluelines need to be returned with the
next submittal.
JV{J. C:t4
RMC/smm/pwm94065
cc: Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works
Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning & Inspection Services
. , . .
. CIC Carter II Burgess
Consultants in Engineering, Architecture,
Planning and the Environment
June 15, 1994
Mr. Mike Curtis
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Reference: PS94-21 Shady Oaks, Fourth Phase
Dear Mike:
We have received your comments on the above referenced plat and respond as
follows:
.
9.
10.
11.
12.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
A vicinity map has been added.
The title block has been revised.
The GPS coordinates have been added.
The easement dedication was added.
The current zoning was added.
The street light plan is being prepared at this time.
The hydrant radii are being added.
We have dedicated 1h of the 60 foot right-of-way. North of our line there
are indications Oron pins, fences, etc.) of a 26 to 28 foot right-of-way.
Additional right-of-way will be taken from the property to the north when it
is platted.
The NOI will be sent, as requested.
If there is an escrow requirement, please let me know immediately.
As plans are finalized, the necessary drainage easement will be added.
Comments will be addressed as necessary.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
CARTER & BURGESS, INC.
eX 'k/~~
Terry vf Mitchell, P.E.
Associate Principal
.
TWM/dmk
93317901.L07
cc: Mr. Clayton Husband
Mr. Jim Harris
Carter & Burgess. Inc. 7950 Elmbrook Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75247-4951
(214) 638-0145 Metro (214\ 263-2019 Fox (214) 638-044ì
PZ Minutes - Page 3
June 23, 1994
Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PS 94-19 subject to engineer" comments, a We'
of sidewalks along North Tarrant Parkway only, and that the Cou decide if escrow is
required along North Tarrant Parkway. The motion was secon by Mr. Baxter.
Mr. Davis amended his motion to impose th quirement of escrow for North Tarrant
Parkway improvements. The amended m on was seconded by Mr. Baxter. The motion
carried 3-2, with Mr. Davis, Mr. Baxter d Mr. Bowen voting for, and Mr. Lueck and
Chairman Brock voting against.
endation to either waive or
can act on the recommendation
placed on the consent agenda for the
Mr. LeBaron asked if the Commission could make a reco
impose the requirement of escrow so that the City Cou
and discuss it if necessary. He stated the item could
Councilor taken off if necessary.
Mr. Davis made the motion to a nd PS 94-19 to incorporate the same language included
in PS 94-20. The motion was conded by Mr. Bowen. The motion carried 3-2, with Mr.
Davis, Mr. Baxter, and Mr. wen voting for, and Mr. Lueck and Chairman Brock voting
against.
e Council has the authority to assess to not to assess based on that
sked staff for an update regarding the future of North Tarrant Parkway and the
legality, requiring escrow on this roadway at the next meeting. He stated there will
y be many more plat come up in the future and some policy is needed in these <
. Bowen stated that if the Commission errors on this requirement, it is an error on the side
3. PS 94-21
Request of James R. Harris Company for Final Plat of Shady Oaks Addition, Phase 4. This
property is located in the 8200 block of North Tarrant Parkway.
Chairman Brock asked if the developer has agreed to all engineering comments.
Mr. Mitchell stated yes.
Mr. Bowen stated there is a requirement for escrow for Shady Grove Road.
Mr. Mitchell stated the developer is prepared to pay that.
Chairman Brock stated the sidewalks will be built by the builder.
Mr. Baxter made the motion to approve PS 94-21 subject to engineering comments and
escrow of funds for Shady Grove Road. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. The
motion carried 5-0.
4. PS 94-22
is
is located at 6424 Industrial Park Boulevard.
k stated this plat is a housecleaning issue to clear up an encroachment of
line. He stated all comments have been addressed.
Mr. Bowen made the ·on to approve PS 94-22. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck.
The motion carried 5-0.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning and Inspections
~ Council Meeting Date:
7/11/94
SUbject:
Request ofH.T. Apartments for Amended Plat of Lot I.
Block 2, Tapp Addition. (Located at 6424 Industrial Park Boulevard)
Agenda Number:
PS 94-22
H.T. Apartments is the owner of the Hilltop Apartment complex located at the northeast comer ofIndustrial Park Boulevard and
Boulder Drive. A recent survey of the property indicated that a portion of the parking lot on the north side encroached the property
line. The apartment complex has purchased the small triangular portion of the adjacent property where the encroachment occurred,
and has submitted an Amended Plat to rectify the situation.
According to the Texas Local Government Code, an Amending Plat may be approved only for certain purposes. One of the purposes
is to relocate a lot line to eliminate an inadvertent encroachment of a building or other improvement on a lot line or easement.
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this Amended Plat at its June 23, 1994 meeting and recommended approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget ~ _
Othe~~ ~ f5~ fj).- £ 11 ~
Departh,ent Head Signature I èity Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
. General Information
A. Owner
B. Developer
C. Engineer
D. Surveyor
E. Acreage
F. No. of Lots
G. Zoning
H. Prop. Use
Streets and Thoroughfares
A. Thor. Plan
.
B. Improvements
C. Extensions
D. New Streets
E. Street Lights
F. Access
G. Sidewalks
H. Screening Walls
I. New Street Names
Drainage
A. Flood Plain
B. Improvements
C. Easements
. Comprehensive Land Use Plan
A. Consistency
B. Special Issues
Subdivision Plat Review Fact Sheet
Case Number PS 94-22
H.T. Apartments, Dallas TX
same
none
David Moak Surveyors, Hurst TX
12.260 acres
R-7-MF Multi-Family Residential
Apartment complex
This property fronts Industrial Park Boulevard, a C4U Major Collector, requiring an ultimate
right-of-way of 68 feet.
None
None
None
Adequate street lighting exists in this area.
Access to this property is from Industrial Park Boulevard and Hilltop Drive.
None required at this time.
None required.
None.
According to Flood Insurance Rate Maps, this property does not lie within a 100-year or a 500-
year flood plain.
None required.
None required.
This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan that calls for high density multi
family development in this area.
None.
N@)R.TH
R.ICHLAND
HILLS
Public Works
June 3, 1994
MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Kevin B. Miller, P.E.
Assistant Public Works Director
SUBJECT: PS 94-22; TAPP ADDITION;
Block 2, Lot 1R; Replat
I have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on May 12 and offer the following
comments.
1. The appropriate signatures need to be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and
Dedication. In addition the surveyor's seal and signature need to be added to the plat.
2. The metes and bounds description appears to be missing a distance in the fourth call This
needs to be resolved.
3. The current zoning needs to be clearly indicated on the face of the plat. This includes the
proposed lots and the adjacent lots.
4. A drainage analysis was not submitted with this plat. The Master Drainage Plan does not
indicate the need for additional drainage improvements associated with this plat. There
appears to be no intention for further development at this time. Based on these
circumstances, Public Works will not require drainage calculations at this time. If there
is a request for building permits in the future then drainage calculations will be required
at that time.
7301 N.E. Loa !> 820 P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 USA
(817) 581-5521 FAX (817) 656-7503
.
.
.
5.
There are several comments regarding the dimensions and distances as compared to the
previous plat. These comments are recorded on a black-line copy of the plat. The plat has
been returned to the Surveyor for revision. Due to the significance of the comments,
Public Works is recommending that this plat be revised prior to consideration by the City
Council. The marked-up black-line need to be returned with the next submittal.
~~
.....- ~
Kevin B. Miller, P.E.
Assistant Public Works Director
KBM/pwm94070
cc: Greg W. Dickens, P.E., Public Works Director
Barry LeBaron, Director of Community Development
NRH
APPLICATION FOR A
AN AMENDED PLAT
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
7301 NE LOOP B20
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TE XAS 76182
817·561·5515
Please print all respcn&8s
EXlSTING SUBDIVISION NAME. L-c, \ J ~"Lc '-. ~ Z
-r- A?? A'\:>~ )\\o,.:j
According to the Texas Local Government Code. an Amending Plat may Þe approved only lor cenÙl purposes. Check the approprate numÞer which applies
and the approprate respon_.
o
o
o
o
o
o
I. 10 OOIrect an error In a 00UffIe or dIIIt_1Ihown on tile preceding plat.
2. to acid a 00II,.,. or dJlitance tllal was omitted on lhe preceding p4at.
3. to Indicat. monumen/s S8t att8f tile dflath. disablllly, or retirement Irom practice ollhe engineer or sulVeyor ræponslble lor settIng monumenlS.
4. to show the location or charact8f 01 a monumenl thaI has been changed In Iocalion or charact8f or that is shown Incorrectly as to location or
character on the preceding p4a1.
5. to correct any other type 01 satvenflr or cI8rlca/ 6fror or omission prØlllously approllØd by the municipal authorily responsible lor approving p4ats.
Including lot numÞers. aaeage. street names. and icHHIillcatlon 01 edjM»nt recorded plats.
6. to correct an error In oou,.,.s and distances 01101 Mnes between tIKI adjacentlols it:
o both lot owners join In the appIlcallon lor amending the pial.
o neither is abolished.
o the amendment does not an"""tto remaw røconIf/d cownants or restrictions.
o the amendment does not have a mat6f1aJ adverse .nect on tile prop8ffy tights 01 tile otller ownership In tile pial.
~ 7. to relocate a lot line to etlmlnate an Inadvertent encroachment 01 a building or oth6f Improvement on a 101 line or flasement.
o 8. to relocate one or more lot Ii". '*- one or more adjacent lots it:
o the owners 01 aJltho88 lot. join In the appt/cantlon lor amending the plat.
o the amendmenl does not anempt to remove røconIf/d cownant. or restrictions
o the amendment does not iI1Ct8II888 tile number dlols.
o 9. to make neœssaty changes to tile preceding plat to aflate six or 1_loIs In the subdivision or a pat1 01 the subdivision covered by the
preceding plat it:
o the changes do nd attect applicable zoning and other f8gulations 01 the municipality.
o the changes do not anempt to amend or r8fÐOVf any OOlllHlallts or restrictions.
o the arfla oovered by the changes is located In an arfla that the municipal planning convnlssion or other appropriate governing body 01 the
municipality has approllØd. an8f. public hflaring. as a resicHHltlaJ Improwment ar...
NAME AND ADDRESS OF CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER: ~ T. A? A ~ME:N ~ ~ ) ~ c...
AP\So W\:;~....ç".~vE, S -\ 2:...~
1::>4\....\..4<;'") ""\X ,SZ.~&
I HEREBY CEFfTIFY THA T I AM. OR REPRESENT. THE LEGAL OWNER OF THE PROPEFfTY DESCR/BED ABO~ AND DO HEREB Y SUBMIT THIS AMENDED PLA T TO THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR CONSIDERATION.
,
~~ ~~-
SIGNITURE OF APPÔ
s- \ \ ~A¡
APPUCATION DATE
~"""" t'":) Y.J. N'I'{~.s
( ~NTED NAME OF APPUCANT
P \ 2.<-~ Z.:z..., \
T LEPHONE NO. Of APPUCANT
NOTE: PLEASE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THE REPLAT DOCUMENT SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST ON THE
REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM.
P6 4" ~. '2.."2-
AMENDED PLAT
CD-042
(1'·93\
PZ Minutes - Page 3
June 23, 1994
.
Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PS 94-19 subject to engineering com nts, a waiver
of sidewalks along North Tarrant Parkway only, and that the Council deci f escrow is
required along North Tarrant Parkway. The motion was seconded by Mr. axter.
Mr. LeBaron asked if the Commission could make a recommendation either waive or
impose the requirement of escrow so that the City Council can act the recommendation
and discuss it if necessary. He stated the item could be placed on e consent agenda for the
Council or taken off if necessary.
scrow for North Tarrant
by Mr. Baxter. The motion
ting for, and Mr. Lueck and
Mr. Davis amended his motion to impose the requirement
Parkway improvements. The amended motion was secon
carried 3-2, with Mr. Davis, Mr. Baxter, and Mr. Bowen
Chairman Brock voting against.
Mr. Davis made the motion to amend PS 94-19 to .
in PS 94-20. The motion was seconded by Mr.
Davis, Mr. Baxter, and Mr. Bowen voting for,
against.
orporate the same language included
en. The motion carried 3-2, with Mr.
Mr. Lueck and Chairman Brock voting
Mr. Mitchell asked if the Council has the thority to assess to not to assess based on that
recommendation.
Chairman Brock stated yes.
.
Mr. Baxter asked staff for an upd regarding the future of North Tarrant Parkway and the
legality of requiring escrow on IS roadway at the next meeting. He stated there will
me up in the future and some policy is needed in these areas.
3. PS 94-21
Mr. Bowen stated that if t Commission errors on this requirement, it is an error on the side
of caution.
rris Company for Final Plat of Shady Oaks Addition, Phase 4. This
the 8200 block of North Tarrant Parkway.
ked if the developer has agreed to all engineering comments.
tated there is a requirement for escrow for Shady Grove Road.
ell stated the developer is prepared to pay that.
an Brock stated the sidewalks will be built by the builder.
axter made the motion to approve PS 94-21 subject to engineering comments and
row of funds for Shady Grove Road. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. The
4. PS 94-22
Request of H.T. Apartments for Amended Plat of Lot 1, Block 2, Tapp Addition. This
property is located at 6424 Industrial Park Boulevard.
.
Chairman Brock stated this plat is a housecleaning issue to clear up an encroachment of a
parking lot on a lot line. He stated all comments have been addressed.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 94-22. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck.
The motion carried 5-0.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date:
7/11/94
Subject: Request of John Barfield for Final Plat of Thornbridge Agenda Number:
Addition, Phase IV-A. (Located in the 8300 block of Thornhill Drive)
PS 94-23
John Barfield is the owner and developer of a tract of land located at the north end of Thornhill Drive. Mr. Barfield has submitted a
Final Plat of the property for the City Council's review. This property will become part of the Thornbridge Addition, located on north
Davis Boulevard. The developer has agreed with all engineering comments. However, there are three issues regarding this Final Plat
that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends resolving in the following manner:
1. The Preliminary Plat of Thornbridge Addition was approved by the Commission on September 14, 1989. There are some
significant differences in the proposed phasing on the Preliminary Plat and the actual development of the subdivision. The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that before any future plats of this property are submitted, a new phasing plan
must be submitted to staff.
2. This property is split between the R-l and R-3 zoning districts. The zoning district line apparently bisects Lots 4 and 7 in
Block 2. According to Section 125 of the Zoning Ordinance, which states the rules for interpretation of zoning district
boundaries, the Zoning District Map should be corrected to follow adjacent lot lines. The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended that the Zoning Map be corrected to show the zoning district line to follow the adjacent lot lines.
3. Sidewalks are required on all public streets as each individual lot develops. The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended that the requirement for sidewalks along Davis Boulevard be waived.
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this Final Plat at its June 23, 1994 meeting and recommended approval subject to
engineering comments, a waiver of the sidewalks along Davis Boulevard, and a zoning map correction in regards to the two bisected
lots.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget _
Other n--:r-
-¡~~JO---
Depart nt Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
^ flAk-
Rf(~
, --
City Manager
Finance Director
Page 1 of
.
.
.
General Information
A. Owner
B. Developer
C. Engineer
D. Surveyor
E. Acreage
F. No. of Lots
G. Zoning
H. Prop. Use
Water and Sewer
A. Lines
8. Fire Coverage
Streets and Thoroughfares
A. Thor. Plan
8. Improvements
C. Extensions
D. New Streets
E. Street Lights
F. Access
G. Sidewalks
H. Screening Walls
I. New Street Names
Subdivision Plat Review Fact Sheet
Case Number PS 94-23
Sandlin-Barfield Joint Venture, Hurst TX
Same
Owen D. Long & Associates, Hurst TX
Loyd Bransom Surveyors, Ft Worth TX
3.17 acres
7
R-I Single Family Residential
Single family residences
The developer will install the necessary water and sewer lines to serve this property.
Adequate.
This property has frontage on Davis Boulevard, a P6D roadway.
None.
Thornhill Drive will be extended to the north approximately 140 feet.
A portion of one new street is proposed.
Street lights will be installed in accordance with Public Works criteria.
Access to this property is from Thornhill Drive.
Sidewalks are required on all lots as each individual lot develops.
A masonry screening wall is required along those lots that have frontage along Davis Boulevard.
The Subdivision Regulations require a masonry screening wall along roads classified as a C4U or
larger.
Thomway Drive
Drainage
A. Flood Plain
B. Improvements
C. Easements
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
A. Consistency
B. Special Issues
According to Flood Insurance Rate Maps, this property does not lie within a 100-year or a 500-
year flood plain.
None
None
This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan that calls for low density single
family development in this area.
None
.
N@RTH
RICH LAND
H ILL S
Public Works
June 10, 1994
MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: R. Michael Curtis, P.E.
Staff Engineer
SUBJECT: PS 94-23; THORNBRIDGE ADDITION, PHASE IV-A;
Final Plat & Construction Plans
.
I have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on May 18, 1994, and offer the
following comments.
1. The preliminary plat (PS 89-19) for this subdivision was approved September 14, 1989.
The Subdivision Regulations require final plat action within three years of the date of
preliminary plat approval. In addition to the three year time period expiring, there are
some significant differences in the actual construction phasing of the subdivision and the
phasing approved with the preliminary plat. The City needs written confirmation
indicating if the phasing approved with the preliminary plat is going to be followed. If
not, indicate the new phasing plan.
2. The title block needs to be revised as shown.
3. The metes and bounds description and the exhibit are not in agreement. The discrepancy
occurs in the ninth and tenth call. This needs to be resolved.
4. The attached easement dedication needs to be incorporated into the closing paragraph after
the metes and bounds description.
.
5. The Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks adjacent to all public streets. The sidewalks
adjacent to Davis Boulevard need to be added to the construction plans for coordination
purposes. It is important to have the sidewalks shown so that the utilities will not be
constructed to interfere with the future sidewalk.
7301 N.E. Loo~ 820 P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 USA
(817) 581-5521 FAX (817) 656-7503
6. The Design Manual contains criteria for necessary fire hydrant coverage. Appropriate
coverage radü for the applicable fire hydrants need to be included. This will assist Public
Works in determining the need for additional fire hydrants.
7. The existing 25 foot Continental Pipeline Easement will need to be shown on the final plat.
In addition, include the volume and page of the easement.
8. The plat indicates that the zoning line bisects Lots 4 and 7. The Zoning Ordinance
requires the zoning line to be at a lot line.
9. There are comments regarding the plat and construction plans. These comments are
recorded on a set of blueline construction plans. The plans have been returned to the
engineer for revision. The marked-up bluelines need to be returned with the next
submittal.
l!4;JQ (2.t-:
RM /smm/pwm94074
cc: Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works
Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning & Inspection Services
.
.
~
.
EASEMENT DEDICATION
The easements indicated on this plat are for the purpose of
constructing, using, and maintaining public utilities including underground
conduits, manholes, pipes, valves, posts, above ground cables, wires or
combinations thereof, together with the right of engress and egress.
Owen D. Long and Associates, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
June 17, 1994
Mr. R. Michael Curtis, P.E.
Staff Engineer for
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: Thombridge Addition
Phase IV A, PS 94-23
Final Plat and Construction Plans
Dear Mike;
We have received your letter of comments dated June 10,1994 on the referenced
Addition and have the following comments:
1. The preliminary plan originally had Phase I being sewered to the west and
the remaining Phases being sewered to the east and then south. We later
found that Phase IIA and IV A could be sewered to west with Phase I. We
are working on the off site sewer main for the remaining Phase II, Phase III
and Phase IV now, that needs to be extended through other owners
property including the Oak Leaf Park. These off site owners now appear to
be willing to allow the off site sewer construction. The remaining Phases
will be revised sightly but will be close to the original plan.
2. The title block will be revised.
3. The metes and bounds description will be revised to fit the plat.
4. The dedication will be revised as requested
5. We will add the sidewalks to the plans including those along Davis
Boulevard.
6. The fire hydrant radius will be added to the plans.
7. The approximate location of the existing gas pipeline will be added to the
plat with the volume and page of the easement.
8. The zoning line does bisect the proposed lots 4, and 7 with only lot 7
buildable area being affected. The deed restrictions and lot size far exceed
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / Hurst. Texas 76054 / Phone (817) 281-8121
~
.
the most restrictive zone of R-2. The owner request that he not be required
to go through a zone change request.
9.
The other comments recorded on the set of blueline construction plans will
be added or revised on the original plans.
If there are any additional comments or requirements. please give me a call.
Sincerely,
~ (f)
Mark Long, P .E.
MDL/cfs
cc: John W. Barfield
lB. Sandlin
.
.
PZ Minutes - Page 4
June 23, 1994
5. PS 94-23
Request of John Barfield for Final Plat of Thornbridge Addition, Phase IV-A. This prope'
located in the 8300 block of Thornhill Drive.
Mr. Doug Long, 1615 Precinct Line Road, Hurst, came forward to represent the owners. He
stated the developers have not abandoned the Preliminary Plat, and the phasing has been
slightly adjusted due to an off-site sewer line. He stated they will follow the phasing more
closely when that sewer line is completed.
Chairman Brock stated they would need to submit a new phasing plat before the
Commission will consider additional plats.
Mr. Long stated they are considering using some open space to accommodate some of the
drainage. He stated they have come up with some other ways to do things.
Mr. Davis asked if the new plan will be a new preliminary plat.
Mr. Long stated the only difference would be the elimination of several lots, but the basic
layout would be the same. He stated these seven lots were all they could get at this time,
especially until the offsite sewer line is installed.
Chairman Brock stated the zoning district line bisects two lots.
Mr. Long stated that line can be adjusted to follow the closest lot line. He stated the deed
restrictions require larger house sizes than the city so there is no problem with moving the
line.
Mr. LeBaron stated it can be handled as a map correction.
Chairman Brock asked if they have agreed to all engineering comments.
Mr. Long stated yes.
Mr. LeBaron asked if the masonry screening wall extends to the north end of the property.
Mr. Long stated yes.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 94-23 subject to engineering comments, a
waiver of sidewalks on Davis, and a zoning map correction in regards to the two bisected
lots. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck. The motion carried 5-0.
Mr. Davis asked if staff will require a new preliminary plat when a new phasing plan is
submitted.
Mr. LeBaron stated based on the discussion by the Commission, he would have to submit an
amended preliminary plat showing the new phasing of the development.
6. PS 94-24
is property is
ed in the 7700 block of Grapevine Highway.
d, 1016 Diamond Boulevard, South lake, came forward to speak.
Chairman Brock a
question regarding sid
if he has agreed to all engineering comments. He stated there '""
s.
Mr. Wood stated yes. He state walks are planned along the mall road, but none have
been planned on Grapevine Highwa to a drainage ditch and pending construction of
the interchange.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning and Inspections ~ Council Meeting Date:
7/11/94
Subject: Public Hearing to consider revisions to the Master Thoroughfare Agenda Number:
Plan regarding Wilson Road.
PS 94-29
Ordinance No. 1995
Wilson Road is a proposed C4U Collector street on the Master Thoroughfare Plan extending from North Tarrant Parkway to Precinct
Line Road. When the Preliminary Plat of the Forest Glen subdivision was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission earlier
this year, the developer's plan included a proposal to change Wilson Road from a C4U Collector to a C2U Collector. Over the years,
the location of Wilson Road has changed on the Master Thoroughfare Plan, although no segment of the street has actually been
constructed. It has simply been a line on a map. However, with the development of the Forest Glen Addition, a major section of this
collector street will be constructed and thereby establish the ultimate alignment of this roadway.
Consideration to revise the Master Thoroughfare Plan will provide the opportunity to coordinate the approval of the Forest Glen Final
Plat by allowing the Final Plat of the Forest Glen Addition to be considered based upon the proper designation of Wilson Road, The
change in the designation of Wilson Road on the Master Thoroughfare Plan from a C4U to a C2U will only affect that portion of the
alignment between North Tarrant Parkway and Davis Boulevard. The name of the proposed street will be changed on the Master
Thoroughfare Plan from Wilson Road to Forest Glen Drive.
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its June 23, 1994 meeting and recommended approval only for the
portion of the proposed road between North Tarrant Parkway and Davis Boulevard.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev,)
Operating BUdQ,el","';:
Other .." '.. .
Il)MlAA,
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
h~".(:
"'...- .
-........,~~
tIur
,~)
2 ,'! './' "
¡ r ./' ' _ .~,,-
./ "·1 . '," ,'. .1
,f _,-ø ;' '1 ~ ',~ ,:_,,/ ..,;---'-"''-#
. Finance Director
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
City Manager
Page 1 of
·
·
·
Ordinance No. 1995
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING THE
MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, TO
MAKE REVISIONS REGARDING WILSON ROAD; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills has forwarded a recommendation to
the City Council for amendment of the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a Public Hearing to consider said revisions, and after hearing, determines that
such revisions shall be adopted.
NOW, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, Wilson Road, a proposed C4U Major Collector thoroughfare, be re-designated on the Master Thoroughfare Plan to a
C2U Minor Collector thoroughfare from its proposed intersection with North Tarrant Parkway to its proposed intersection
with Davis Boulevard (FM 1938), as shown in attached Exhibit A.
2.
THAT, proposed Wilson Road be hereby renamed Forest Glen Drive from its proposed intersection with North Tarrant
Parkway to its termination at Precinct Line Road, as shown in attached Exhibit A.
3.
THAT, the Master Thoroughfare Plan shall hereafter reflect these revisions.
4.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of
this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences,
paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
5.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall
remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance.;
6.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 23rd DAY OF JUNE, 1994.
íbvØjd~~'
,/
Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission
)t ¡;. -
. . ~,.~
.. . ...~~~",.\' ... f'.'
. .. ,-po,>;;..,,,,,
Chairman, P~ing and~ónfng ~~mmission
I'i
"."i
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 1 Ith DAY OF mL Y, 1994.
Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
Ordinance No. 1995
Page 2
I 0
~ .,
c.
I -.
\ ~
D)m
.~ I \ ~ ><
n ::r
tD -.
C"
z:::.
~»
-a.
U)
U)
01
-.! Ië:lS
lUU \
C)
..
~
~
=
~
-
<r
'C
~den Rd.
rtN
c..
.
Preci t Line Rd.
C==
."
~
E
'C
.
PZ Minutes - Page 5
June 23, 1994
Chairman Brock asked if Mr. Wood would rather build the sidewa or escrow money
the sidewalks.
e. He stated the sidewalk
highway.
Mr. Wood he has not discussed that with his engineer at this
would not be practical due to the drainage channel along t
Mr. Lueck asked why the developer would not be resp ible for the construction of this
road.
auld be bui It before the restaurant.
Mr. Husband stated he believes there are three pa s involved with three different phases of
the road.
Mr. Lueck asked if enough right-of-way is th
Mr. Husband stated TxDOT has purchas right-of-way in this are for the reconstruction of
the interchange.
Mr. Wood stated Knowlton- lish-Flowers has been working on the design of the road for
some time. He stated he i eing funded by the May Company to build the road themselves,
and the road must be bui efore the restaurant can be constructed. Mr. Wood stated the
entrance to the road wi e moved further south. -..
made the motion to approve PS 94-24 subject to engineering comments, the
name changed as recommended by staff, and the developer either build sidewalks or
escro the funds for them. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck. The motion carried 5-0.
all road will be dedicated to the public.
f the final plat will include plans for that road.
ed no. He stated they will have no ownership in the road. He stated several
rticipating in the funding of the road.
7. PS 94-25
est of Evergreen Asset Corporation for Preliminary Plat of Evergreen Nursing Center
ition. This property is located at 7720 Rufe Snow Drive.
ing.
8. PS 94-29
Public Hearing to consider revisions to the Master Thoroughfare Plan regarding Wilson
Road.
Mr. LeBaron stated the Commission considered a plat recently that incorporated the
proposed Wilson Road. He stated during the discussion the Commission considered
downgrading Wilson Road from a C4U to a C2U. He stated this item is following up on that
recommendation to amend the Master Thoroughfare Plan.
J
Chairman Brock stated the intent of the Commission at that time was to only change the plan
from North Tarrant Parkway to Davis Boulevard.
·
·
·
PZ Minutes - Page 6
June 23, 1994
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called those wishing to speak to come
forward at this time.
Mr. Doug Long, 1615 Precinct Line Road, Hurst, came forward to speak. He stated they are
the developer of the property in question. He stated they control the access through there.
Mr. Long stated they have proposed a change in the name to Forest Glen Drive.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. LeBaron stated the cover sheet also recommends the name of the street be changed to
Forest Glen Drive,
Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve PS 94-29, effective only between North Tarrant
Parkway to Davis Boulevard. The motion was seconded by Mr. Davis. The motion carried
5-0.
ZONING CASES
James Brock, Chairman
Planning and Zoning Commission
None.
STAFF REPORT
None.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
er business, the meeting was adjourned.
Victor Baxter, Secretary
Planning and Zoning Commission
I
e
-j\
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Economic Development
Urdlnance Approving I U Electric's t-our Proposed
New Tarriffs - Ordinance No. 1922
Council Meeting Date: 6/27/94
Agenda Number: GN 94-73
Subject:
The Texas Utilities Electric Company (TU Electric) recently filed a Petition and Statement of Intent
requesting the City's approval of a rider to authorize four new tariffs (see attached information).
This rate package is intended to help hold down rates for all customers while facilitating increased
employment and economic activity, saving energy, and improving the environment. In each of the
four proposed tariffs, the demand changes are less than under existing rates.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 1992.
. Clnance Review
91 Acct. Number
~ufflclent Funds Available
e rt. -~
artment Head Signature I. City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating udget
Ot
-
. Finance Director
e
ORDINANCE: NO. ] gg?
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY'S PROPOSED
RIDER ED - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICE, RATE GC - GENERAL SERVICE
COMPETITIVE PRICING, RATE WPC WHOLESALE POWER COMPETITIVE
PRICING, AND RIDER ET - ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY SERVICE, PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE THEREFOR, PROVIDING CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH SUCH
RATE SCHEDULES AND SERVICE REGULATIONS MAY BE CHANGED, MODIFIED,
AMENDED OR WITHDRAWN, FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT
WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY
LAW, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY
N~~TQ ~TrUTANn ~TTT,
r.mmr.n.
I TEXAS:
OF THE CITY OF
e
SECTION 1. On June 6, 1994, Texas Utilities Electric Company
filed with the Governing Body of this municipality a Petition and
Statement of Intent proposing to implement four new tariff
schedules: Rider ED - Economic Development Service: Rate GC _
General Service Competitive Pricing: Rate WPC - Wholesale Power
Competitive Pricing: and Rider ET - Environmental Technology
Service. Said proposed tariffs are each hereby approved for
implementation by Texas Utilities Electric Company within the
corporate limits of this municipality until such time as said
tariff schedules may be changed, modified, amended, or withdrawn
with the approval of the Governing Body of this municipality.
SECTION 2. The aforesaid tariff schedules herein approved
shall be effective from and after the final passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION 3. The filing of said tariff schedules shall
consti tute notice to the consumers of electricity, wi thin this
municipality, of the availability and application of such tariff
schedules.
SECTION 4. Nothing in this Ordinance contained shall be
construed now or hereafter as limiting or mOdifying in any manner,
the right and power of the Governing Body of this municipality
under the law to regulate the rates, operations, and services of
Texas Utilities Electric Company.
SECTION 5. It is hereby officially found and determined that
the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public
and as required by law and that public notice of the time, place
and purpose of said meeting was given as required.
SECTION 6. An emergency exists necessitating the suspension
of any rule requiring multiple readings of this Ordinance and all
multiple readings of this Ordinance are hereby waived: this
-
-1-
e
Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED at a Regular Meeting of the city
COUNCIL of the City of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Texas, on this the 27th day of .rTTNF , 1994.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
e
ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY
e
-2-
e
BEFORE THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
APPLICATION OF TEXAS UTILITIES §
ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY S
TO IMPLEMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOP- S
MENT SERVICE, GENERAL SERVICE S
COMPETITIVE PRICING, WHOLESALE S
POWER COMPETITIVE PRICING, AND S
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY S
SERVICE S
DOCKET NO.
PETITION AND STATEMENT OF INTENT
TO THE HONORABLE SAID GOVERNING BODY:
For its Petition and Statement of Intent, Texas Utilities
Electric Company ("TU Electric"), a corporation organized and
-
existing under the laws of the State of Texas and a public utility
as that term is defined in the Public Utility Regulatory Act,
Article 1446c, V.A.T.S. (the "PURA"), respectfully submits the
following:
I.
TU Electric proposes tariffs under which it seeks to offer
four new services within its service territory:
(1) Economic Development Service -- through proposed Rider
ED, which is a rider to TU Electric's existing General
Service Rates GS, GP, and HV that provides for a
discounted demand charge to those that qualify under the
terms of the Rider; Rider ED is designed to contribute to
-
. the economic development of the service territory by
attracting new businesses and industries and the
expansion by existing businesses and industries;
(2) General Service competitive Pricing -- through proposed
e
Rate GC, which provides for a negotiated reduction,
within limits, in the demand charges that would otherwise
be applicable to the customer's electrical load under TU
Electric's General Service Rates GS, GP, or HV, where the
customer's electrical load otherwise would not be served
by the Company because, without the reduction in the
demand charges, the customer would self-generate its
electricity or obtain service from another energy service
supplier or cease its operations;
(3) Wholesale Power Competitive Pricing -- through proposed
Rate WPC, which provides for a negotiated reduction,
within limits, in the demand charges that would otherwise
be applicable to the customer's electrical load under TU
Electric's Wholesale Power Rate WP, where the customer's
electrical load otherwise would not be served by the
Company because, wi thout the reduction in the demand
charges, the customer would self-generate its electricity
or obtain service from another energy service supplier;
and
(4) Environmental Technology Service -- through proposed
Rider ET, which is a rider to TU Electric's existing
General Service Rates GS, GP, and HV that provides for a
discounted demand charge to those that qualify under the
terms of the proposed Rider; proposed Rider ET is
designed to encourage the use of more energy-efficient
electrical technologies or processes that significantly
e
e
-2-
e
improve the quality of the environment through the use of
an electrical technology, such as the substitution of an
electric arc furnace for a coke-fired furnace in a metals
fabrication facility or infrared heating for coating
processes to reduce volatile organic compound emissions.
Attached hereto and made a part hereof is a copy of the Petition
and Statement of Intent being filed with the Public Utility
Commission of Texas ("Commission") contemporaneously with the
filing of this Petition and Statement of Intent, together with the
testimony and exhibits of Dr. William E. Avera, Mr. Marc W.
Goldsmith, and Mr. Stephen J. Houle, which justify the provision of
these new services and the reasonableness and propriety of the
provisions of the proposed tariffs.
II.
This municipal regulatory authority has jurisdiction over TU
Electric and the subject matter hereof within this municipality's
corporate limits by virtue of Sections l7(a), 37, and 43 of the
PURA .
e
III.
In keeping with the provisions of Section 43(a) of the PURA,
TU Electric proposes that the proposed tariffs be effective on July
11, 1994.
IV.
The proposed tariffs are-attached as Exhibits SJH-l, SJH-2,
SJH-3, and SJH-4 to the direct testimony of Mr. stephen J. Houle,
an attachment to the Petition and Statement of Intent filed with
e
-3-
e
the Commission. In addition to the explanation set forth in
Section I hereof, the proposed tariffs are further explained in
detail in Mr. Houle's testimony.
V.
This is not a "major change" as that term is defined in
Section 43(b) of the PURA. All of the information required by
Section 43 (a) of the PURA is set forth in this Petition and
Statement of Intent and the attachments hereto. The proposed
tariffs will not increase TU Electric' s rates but provide for
reductions to the existing rates.
VI.
The only customers that will be affected by the proposed
Economic Development Service Rider ED, the proposed General Service
Competitive Pricing Rate GC, and the proposed Environmental
Technology Service Rider ET are those customers that are eligible
for service under TU Electric's existing General Service Rates GS,
GP, and HV and that qualify for the service under the terms of the
proposed tariffs. The demand charges under those proposed tariffs
are less than the demand charges under Rates GS, GP, and HV ,
respectively. The only customers that will be affected by the
proposed Wholesale Power Competitive Pricing Rate WPC are those
customers that are eligible for service under TU Electric's
existing Wholesale Power Rate WP and that qualify for the service
under the terms of the proposed tariff. The demand charges under
this proposed tariff are less than the demand charges under Rate
WP. The territory affected by this proceeding consists of the area
e
e
-4-
4IÞ within the corporate limits of this municipality certificated to TU
Electric by the Commission: however, TU Electric is seeking
authority from the Commission and all of its municipal regulatory
authorities to implement these four proposed tariffs, so that same
will be applicable throughout all of the territories to which it is
certificated to provide electric service.
VII.
Notice of this Petition and statement of Intent is being
published for four consecutive weeks in newspapers having general
circulation in the counties in which TU Electric provides electric
service.
VIII.
The business and mailing address of TU Electric is:
4IÞ
Texas utilities Electric Company
2001 Bryan street
Dallas, Texas 75201
TU Electric's business telephone number, including area code,
is:
(214) 812-4600
TU Electric's authorized representatives are:
R. D. Keeney
Vice President
Texas utilities Electric Company
2001 Bryan street, suite 2100
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 812-2778
and
e
J. Dan Bohannan
Worsham, Forsythe, Sampels & Wooldridge, L.L.P.
2001 Bryan street, suite 3200
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 979-3000
-5-
4IÞ General inquiries concerning this Petition and statement of Intent
should be directed to Mr. Keeney at the above-stated address and
telephone.
All pleadings, motions, orders, and other documents
filed in this proceeding should be served upon Mr. Bohannan at the
above-stated address.
WHEREFORE, TU Electric prays this Honorable Governing Body to
approve the proposed tariffs and authorize it to provide· the
requested new services: further, TU Electric prays for such other
relief to which it may be justly entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
e
WORSHAM, FORSYTHE, SAMPELS &
WOOLDRIDGE, L.L.P.
J. Dan Bohannan
State Bar No. 02563000
2001 Bryan Street, Suite 3200
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: (14) 979-3000
Fax: (214) 0-0011
By: "'"'~
ATTO YS FOR TEXAS UTILITIES
ELECTRIC COMPANY
e
-6-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Police Department
Subject: Interlocal AQreement for Precinct Line Road Jurisdiction
Resolution #94-30
Council Meeting Date: 7-11-94
Agenda Number: GN 94-75
The North Richland Hills Police Department has been in dialogue with the Colleyville Police
Department regarding the jurisdictional problems for public safety (Police, Fire and EMS) that will
manifest themselves when Precinct Line Road is widened. There are places on the planned right
of way map that show cuts as far as 80 feet into the City of Colleyville. There are other locations
on the map that show cuts into the North Richland Hills side of the roadway.
Historically, there has been a problem in determining which jurisdiction an offense, traffic violation
or traffic accident has occurred since the city boundaries of each jurisdiction vary as one travels
northbound on Precinct Line Road from Grapevine Highway.
The Police Departments have approached the City Managers of both cities and have received
approval to proceed with styling an Interlocal Agreement between the City of North Richland Hills
and the City of Colleyville which will give total public safety jurisdiction to the City of North
Richland Hills. This roadway is Farm to Market Road 3029 and is, therefore, maintained by the
State of Texas. No maintenance will be required by the City of North Richland Hills if we enter into
this Agreement.
Resolution No. 94-18 was approved recently authorizing the same type of Agreement with the City
of Hurst regarding the same difficulties.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the attached Agreement be approved by the City Council and that the City
Manager be given the authority to execute the attached Interlocal Agreement as provided in
Resolution No. 94-30.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
. Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~~/~
ead Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
Paqe 1 of
RESOLUTION NO. 94-30
.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS that:
1.
The City Manager be, and is hereby authorized to execute the attached Agreement between
this City and the City of Colleyville as the act and deed of the City.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 11 th day of July, 1994
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
. Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City.
.
STATE OF TEXAS
)
)
)
AGREEMENT
COUNTY OF TARRANT
·
This Agreement, made and entered into by and between the City of Colleyville, a municipal corporation,
located in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called "Colleyville," and the City of North Richland Hills, a
municipal corporation, located in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called "North Richland Hills," evidences
the following:
WHEREAS, North Richland Hills, and Colleyville desire to enter into an Agreement at the request of North
Richland Hills for the provision of all Public Safety services to be provided by a single municipality on the
public roadway named Farm to Market Road 3029, hereinafter referred to as Precinct Line Road, and
WHEREAS, the Agreement shall only apply to those areas described within this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, The Interlocal Cooperation Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 791, provides authorization
for any local government to contract with one or more local governments to perform governmental functions
and services under the term of the Act; and
WHEREAS, North Richland Hills and Colleyville have agreed that North Richland Hills shall provide all
public safety services on the aforementioned roadway regardless of municipal boundaries between the two
cities; and
WHEREAS, public safety services are defined as all services, duties or functions performed by police, fire or
emergency medical service (ambulance service) departments; and
· WHEREAS, No additional revenues are necessary to provide this service at the time of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, it is mutually advantageous to both parties to enter into the arrangement evidenced by this
Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties in consideration of the terms and conditions contained herein, agree as
follows;
The responsibility of each government entity is outlined below:
I.
Colleyville
Colleyville hereby agrees:
I. To empower North Richland Hills to provide police, fire and emergency medical service
(ambulance service) on Precinct Line Road in those areas ofthe roadway that are within
the Incorporated City Limits of ColIeyville.
·
2. To recognize North Richland Hills as the sole provider of such service unless North
Richland Hills calls for assistance under other Interlocal Agreements that deal with
shared resources in time of defined need.
3.
To direct all telephone calls for police, fire or emergency medical service to North
Richland Hills to assure timely emergency response to the public.
.
4. That the only areas affected by this Agreement are those portions of existing or future
roadway on Precinct Line Road that begin at the Southern border of Colleyville where
the city of Colleyville meets the Northern border of the city of Hurst, with such roadway
traveling Northbound to its current tenninating point or at any future point of
tennination. The roadway that North Richland Hills will be responsible to provide public
safety service upon shall be any and all portions of the roadway within the extension of
the lateral curb lines on the East side of Precinct Line Road. If no curb exists, the
authority by North Richland Hills shall extend to the begiIU1ing of the nearest property
line adjacent to the East side of the roadway, thereby including improved or unimproved
shoulders and any Rights of Way that are public land.
5. That this Agreement has no impact on the maintenance of any roadway, signal lighting,
regulation of "curb cuts" or any other area that does not fall directly under the authority
of the North Richland Hills Police Department; North Richland Hills Fire Department or
persoIU1el summoned by those emergency agencies to act at their direction specifically for
the purpose of public safety.
6.
That this Agreement must be specifically authorized independently of any other
Agreement. Should any other city department of either municipality enter into any future
Interlocal Agreements regarding this same location, this Agreement must specifically be
repealed if any conflict is found to exist. This Agreement shall serve as the prevailing
Agreement regarding police, fire and emergency medical service response.
.
7. That all violations of State law or North Richland Hills City Ordinance that can be filed
in a municipal court shall be enforced and adjudicated in the North Richland Hills
Municipal Court.
8. That all fees and fines collected through enforcement efforts by North Richland Hills be
the sole property of North Richland Hills. The responsibility for the collection and other
Court related matters shall be that of North Richland Hills.
9. That the selection of any contract wrecker service to be utilized in the perfonnance of
public safety duties shall be the responsibility of North Richland Hills.
10. That North Richland Hills shall have the same rights and privileges on Precinct Line
Road in the locations described as if the areas described were within the Incorporated
City Limits of North Richland Hills.
.
·
·
·
. .
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
North Rich/and Hills hereby agrees:
I. To provide full police, fire and emergency medical services to the area defined in this
Agreement.
2. To be responsible for the collection of fines and fees for applicable law violations through
the North Richland Hills Municipal Court.
3. That this Agreement has no impact on the maintenance of any roadway, signal lighting,
regulation of "curb cuts" or any other area that does not fall directly under the authority
of the North Richland Hills Police Department; North Richland Hills Fire Department or
personnel summoned by those emergency agencies to act at their direction specifically for
the purpose of public safety.
4.
That the only areas affected by this Agreement are those portions of existing or future
roadway on Precinct Line Road that begin at the Southem border of Colleyville where
the city of Colleyville meets the Northem border of the city of Hurst, with such roadway
traveling Northbound to its current tenninating point or at any future point of
tennination. The roadway that North Richland Hills will be responsible to provide public
safety service upon shall be any and all portions of the roadway within the extension of
the lateral curb lines on the East side of Precinct Line Road. If no curb exists, the
authority by North Richland Hills shall extend to the beginning of the nearest property
line adjacent to the East side of the roadway, thereby including improved or unimproved
shoulders and any Rights of Way that are public land.
5. That this Agreement must be specifically authorized independently. of any other
Agreement. Should any other city department of either municipality enter into any future
InterIocal Agreements regarding this same location, this Agreement must specifically be
repealed if any conflict is found to exist. This Agreement shall serve as the prevailing
Agreement regarding police, fire and emergency medical service response.
II.
Colleyville authorizes North Richland Hills full authority to act as the sole provider of police, fire and
emergency medical services within the City Limits of Colleyville on Precinct Line Road as described in this
Agreement.
III.
It is understood by both parties that the intent of this agreement is for provision of a single provider of public
safety services to eliminate boundary confusion. It is further understood by both parties that this Agreement
shall serve as clarification as to who shall have full authority and responsibility to enforce law and file
criminal cases that pertain to the areas of Precinct Line Road described earlier in this Agreement.
.
.
.
.. .
,.,'
IV.
Each City does hereby waive all claims against and agrees to release every other City, its police department,
officials, agents, officers and employees in both their public and private capacities, from and against any and
all claims, suits, demands, losses, damages, causes of action and liability of every kind, including but not
limited to court costs and attorney's fees which may arise due to any death or injury to any person, or the loss
of, damage to, or loss of use of any property arising out of or occurring as a consequence of the performance
of this agreement whether such injuries, death or damages are caused by the sole negligence or the joint
negligence of any City, its officials, agents, officers and employees. It is the express intention of the parties
hereto that the waiver and release provided for in this paragraph includes claims arising out of such other
City's own negligence, whether that negligence is a sole or a concurring cause of the injury, death or damage.
It is expressly understood and agreed that, in the execution of this Agreement, no City waives, nor shall be
deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims
arising in the exercise of governmental powers and functions.
V.
This Agreement shall take effect upon the signing of both municipalities and shall be in full force and effect
until terminated by either party. If any party wishes to terminate this Agreement, they shall notify the other
party in writing with thirty days notice of termination. Any party may terminate this Agreement independently
or both parties may mutually agree to terminate the Agreement.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
City Manager
City Manager
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City Secretary
Chief of Police
Chief of Police
This agreement was executed by North Richland Hills on the _ day of , 1994.
(City Council Resolution Number )
This agreement was executed by Colleyville on the _ day of , 1994
(City Council Resolution Number
)
~. ,~.-.),
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Police Department
eUbject· Interlocal A~reement for Northeast Tarrant County Street
. (.;nmes nit, KeSOlutlon ~~4-29
Council Meeting Date: 7-11-94
Agenda Number: GN 94-76
The North Richland Hills Police Department has been in dialogue with the Police Departments
of Richland Hills, Haltom City and Watauga regarding the implementation of a specialized
investigative unit entitled "The Northeast Tarrant County Street Crimes Unit." Each agency
mentioned above feels that the importance of such a unit is of sufficient magnitude to create the
unit and dedicate a minimum of one, full time police officer to be used for the investigation and
intelligence gathering..
The purpose of a "Street Crimes Unit" is to involve investigators in criminal investigations at the
street level and to gather intelligence information that assists law enforcement in making street
crime arrests or, in some cases, prevention of crime. The target areas of attention for such a unit
are gangs, burglary rings or other organized criminal activities generally involving more than
single perpetrators.
The proposed Interlocal Agreement outlines how the unit is to be organized and expands the
officers' enforcement ability by allowing them extraterritorial jurisdiction into the cities of the
parties to the Agreement.
.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the attached Agreement be approved by the City Council and that the City
Manager be given the authority to execute the attached Interlocal Agreement as provided in
Resolution No. 94-29.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
e Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
, Finance Director
epartment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
!2V~
City Manager
Page 1 of
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-29
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS that:
1.
The City Manager be, and is hereby authorized to execute the attached Agreement
between this City and the Cities of Richland Hills, Haltom City and Watauga as the act and
deed of the City.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 11th day of July, 1994
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City.
.
NORTHEAST STREET CRIMES UNIT INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUN1Y OF TARRANT §
WHEREAS, past experience has indicated that a cooperative effort between law
enforcement agencies and Tarrant County has been effective in detecting and deterring the
activities of targeted criminal groups to the mutual benefit of all participating political
entities; and
WHEREAS, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Texas Government Code Chapter 791,
provides authorization for any local government to contract with one or more local
governments to perform governmental functions and services under the terms of the act;
. and
WHEREAS, North RicWand Hills, Haltom City, Watauga, and RicWand Hills desire
to enter into an agreement at the request of North RicWand Hills for the formation of a
street crimes unit; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Agreement shall be to provide extraterritorial law
enforcement jurisdiction to police officers from each of the cities which are parties to this
Agreement within the corporate city limits of North RicWand Hills, Haltom City, Watauga
and RicWand Hills for the purpose of investigating and enforcing violations of criminal
laws; and
WHEREAS, it is mutually advantageous to all parties to enter into this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT KNOWN BY THESE PRESENTS:
.
f:\filcs\muni\hc\crimeagriin (~28-94)
.
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Haltom City,
a municipal corporation located in Tarrant County, Texas (hereinafter called "Haltom
City"), the City of Rich1and Hills, a municipal corporation located in Tarrant County,
Texas (hereinafter called "Rich1and Hills"), the City of Watauga, a municipal corporation
located in Tarrant County, Texas (hereinafter called "Watauga"), and the City of North
Rich1and Hills, a municipal corporation located in Tarrant County, Texas (hereinafter called
"North Rich1and Hills"), each acting by and through their respective City Managers or
Mayors. The parties hereto may be hereinafter referred to as "participating cities" or
"participating agencies."
SECTION 1.
Creation. There is hereby created a "Street Crimes Unit" whose formal name
. shall be The Northeast Street Crimes Unit (hereinafter called "Unit"). The activities of the
Unit shall be supervised by a four (4) member board. This board will include as voting
members the Chief of Police, or his designee, of each city participating in this Agreement.
Each board member shall be entitled to a single vote. The board shall have the
responsibility for policy, direction and control of the unit. The board will monitor the
activities and accomplishments of the Unit to ensure orderly progress towards attainment
of all stated objectives.
.
SECTION 2.
Extraterritorial Law Enforcement Jurisdiction. Any law enforcement officer assigned
to the Unit by a governmental entity which is a party to this Agreement shall be
empowered to enforce all criminal laws and ordinances applicable in the jurisdiction of
f:\filcs\muni\hc\crimcagr.fin (06-28-94)
.
.
.
participating cities, including the power to make arrests, execute search warrants, and
investigate criminal offenses outside the geographical jurisdiction from which he or she is
assigned, but within the area covered by the jurisdictions of the municipal entities which
are parties to this Agreement. The extraterritorial law enforcement jurisdiction granted
herein is limited to officers assigned to or assisting the Unit with investigative or
enforcement actions.
SECfION 3.
General Responsibility of Participatin2 Cities. Each municipality participating in
this Agreement shall bear the following responsibilities:
a. To create and maintain a database of people suspected of being involved in
gangs or other criminal activities and to make the database available to each
of the four (4) cities participating in the Unit.
b.
To make every effort to cooperate with other similar units in the greater Fort
Worth area.
c. To assign one or more officers to the Unit as that officer's principal duty.
d. To provide an organized, well coordinated, flexible unit for the purpose of
investigating crimes; providing lawful surveillance of suspects; and enforcing
laws in areas involving juvenile crime, gang activity, organized criminal activity
or other violations of the law requiring the attention of the Unit.
e. Any person arrested by members of the Unit shall be jailed in any of the four
(4) police facilities as deemed appropriate by the Unit. Considerations
regarding where juveniles are to be detained or adults confined shall be made
with consideration of such factors such as proximity of the facility to arrest,
safety of the prisoner, or numbers of prisoners that must be confined or
detained.
SECfION 4.
Seized Assets.
Any assets seized pursuant to State law, with the exception of
f:\filcs\muni\bc\crimc:agr lin (06-28-94)
.
.
.
seized motor vehicles, shall be divided among the four (4) participating agencies. The
assets and proceeds from assets shall be divided on a pro rata basis, based upon the
number of personnel a participating agency has assigned to the Unit. All assets shall be
distnòuted to the participating agencies pursuant to State law. Seized motor vehicles shall
be distnòuted among the agencies on a rotation basis which will initially be determined by
a random number drawing. Once the four (4) position rotation has been established, any
seized motor vehicle shall be available to the city that is first on the list and whether the
city exercises it's selection and possession of the vehicle or not the city shall then move to
the bottom of the selection list. IT the agency receiving the seized vehicle auctions the
vehicle at a later date pursuant to State law, the funds obtained through said auction will
remain the property of the agency who auctioned the vehicle.
SECTION 5.
Amendments. This Agreement may not be amended or modified except by the
express written approval of all parties to this Agreement. This instrument contains all
commitments and agreements of the parties, and no oral or written commitments have any
force or effect to alter any term or condition of this Agreement, unless the same are done
in proper form and in a manner constituting a bona fide amendment hereto.
SECTION 6.
Release. Each participating city does hereby waive all claims and agrees to
release every other participating city, its police department, officials, agents, officers and
employees in both their public and private capacities, from and against any and all claims,
suits demands, losses, damages, causes of action and liability of every kind including, but
f:\filcs\muni\hc\crimeagr lin (06-28-94)
.
.
.
not limited, to court costs and attorney's fees which may arise due to any death or injury
to any person, or the loss of, damage to or loss of use of any property arising out of or
occurring as a consequence of the performance of this Agreement, whether such injuries,
death or damages are caused by the sole negligence or joint negligence of any city, its
officials, agents, officers and employees. It is the express intention of the parties hereto
that the waiver and release provided for in this paragraph includes claims arising out of
such other city's own negligence, whether that negligence is a sole or concurring cause of
the injury, death or damage. Third party claims against members shall be governed by the
Texas Tort Qaims Act or other appropriate statutes and laws of the State of Texas and
the United States. It is expressly understood and agreed that in the execution of this
Agreement, no party waives, nor shall be deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or
defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising in the exercise of
governmental powers and functions.
SECfION 7.
Severance Clause. In case anyone or more of the provision contained in this
Agreement shall for any reason be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect,
such invalidity, illegality or unenforcability shall not affect any other provision thereof and
this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision
had never been contained herein.
SECfION 8.
Venue. The validity of this Agreement and of any of its terms or provisions, as well
as the rights and duties of the parties hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the State
f:\files\muni\hc\crimeagr liD (06-28-94)
.
.
.
of Texas.
SECl10N 9.
Effective Date. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect when signed
by participating agencies on an individual basis. This Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect, on an individual basis, until terminated by any party upon thirty (30) days
written notice to the others or until all parties, in writing, mutually agree to change or
modify the terms of this Agreement.
EXECUTED on this the day of , 1994.
ATTEST:
City Secretary, North Richland Hills
Chief of Police, North Richland Hills
ATTEST:
City Secretary, Richland Hills
Chief of Police, Richland Hills
f:\filcs\muni\hc\c:rimcagr.fin (06-28-94)
City Manager, North Richland Hills
City Manager, Richland Hills
.
(;ø ç ,
City Manager, Haltom City
ATrEST: \.
~~:ff/JJ"A' !J ).$/J{j~
City S cretary, Haltom City
Chief of Police, Haltom City
ATrEST:
Mayor, Watauga
. City Secretary, Watauga
Chief of Police, Watauga
.
f:\files\muni\hc\crimcagr lin (~23-94)
. ~ ...,.,."......".~',?'J.,
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Police Department Council Meeting Date: 7 -11-94
eUbject: Ordinance adoptinQ curfew hours for Minors, Ordinance #1994 Agenda Number: GN 94-77
The attached Ordinance #1994 establishing a juvenile curfew is proposed in an effort to attempt
to gain some control of the juvenile crime with which the entire metroplex is contending. The
intent of the Police Department is to utilize this proposed ordinance sparingly and only after
other methods of policing have been attempted. This ordinance is designed to protect our youth
rather than to punish them. It directly tracks the Dallas ordinance that withstood a constitutional
challenge. Similar ordinances have been considered and in most cases have been approved
throughout the metroplex. We certainly encourage parents and juveniles to assist us in
protecting their best interests by cooperating with such an ordinance.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1994.
.
Finance Review
_o_-
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
. Operating Budget
Other
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
¡Ç~-0
Departme t Head Signature ' City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO. 1994
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING CURFEW HOURS FOR MINORS
IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS; DEFINING
TERMS; CREATING OFFENSES FOR MINORS, PARENTS
AND GUARDIANS OF MINORS AND BUSINESS
ESTABLISHMENTS VIOLATING CURFEW REGULATIONS;
PROVIDING DEFENSES; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT
BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT; PROVIDING FOR
WAIVER BY THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF JURISDICTION
OVER THE MINOR WHEN REQUIRED BY THE TEXAS
FAMILY CODE; PROVIDING THAT THE ORDINANCE
SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT IN
EXCESS OF $ ; PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS THIS 11th DAY OF July, 1994.
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO. 1994
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there has been an
increase in juvenile violence, juvenile gang activity and crime
by persons under the age of 17 years in the City of North
Richland Hills; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that many juvenile crimes
and gang related violence could be avoided by adopting the curfew
hours set forth in this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, persons under the age of 17 years are particularly
susceptible, by their lack of maturity and experience, to
participate in unlawful gang-related activities and to be victims
of older perpetrators of crime; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the passage of this
Ordinance furthers a compelling state interest in protecting
juveniles from crime on the streets; and
WHEREAS, a curfew for those under the age of 17 will be in
the interest of the public health and general welfare of the
city.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS THAT:
1. Defining Terms:
(1) Curfew Hours mean:
(a) 11:00 p.m. on any Sunday, Monday, Tuesday,
Wednesday, or Thursday until 6:00 a.m. of the
fOllowing day; and
(b) 12:01 a.m. until 6:00 a.m. on any Saturday or
Sunday.
(2) Emergency means an unforeseen combination of
circumstances or the resulting state that calls for
immediate action. The term includes, but is not limited to
a fire, a natural disaster, an automobile accident, or any
situation requiring immediate action to prevent serious
bodily injury or loss of life.
(3) Establishment means any privately-owned place of
business operated for a profit to which the public is
invited, including but not limited to any place of amusement
or entertainment.
Curfew Ordinance - Page 1
(4) Guardian means:
4IÞ (a) a person who, under court order, is the guardian
of the person or minor; or
(b) a public or private agency with whom a minor has
been placed by the court.
(5) Kinor means any person under 17 years of age.
(6) Officer means a police officer of the City of North
Richland Hills.
(7) Operator means any individual, firm, association,
partnership, or corporation operating, managing, or
conducting any establishment. The term includes the members
or partners of an association or partnership and the
officers of a corporation.
(8) Parent means a person who is:
(a) a natural parent, adoptive parent, or step-parent
of another person; or
4IÞ
(b) at least 18 years of age and authorized by a
parent or guardian to have the care and custody of a
minor.
(9) Public Place means any place to which the public or a
substantial group of the public has access and includes, but
is not limited to, streets, highways, and the common areas
of schools, hospitals, apartment houses, office buildings,
transport facilities, and shops.
(10) Remain means to:
(a) linger or stay; or
(b) fail to leave premises when requested to do so by
an officer or the owner, operator, or other person in
control of the premises.
(11) Serious Bodily Injury means bodily injury that creates
a substantial risk of death or that causes death, serious
permanent disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of
the function of any bodily member or organ.
2. Offenses
(1) A minor commits an offense if he remains in any public
4IÞ
Curfew Ordinance - Page 2
.
.
.
place or on the premises of any establishment within the
city during curfew hours.
(2) A parent or guardian of a minor commits an offense if
he knowingly permits, or by insufficient control allows, the
minor to remain in any public place or on the premises of
any establishment within the city during curfew hours.
(3) The owner, operator, or any employee of an
establishment commits an offense if he knowingly allows a
minor to remain upon the premises of the establishment
during curfew hours.
3. Defenses
(1) It is a defense to prosecution under Section 2 that the
minor was:
(a) accompanied by the minor's parent or guardian;
(b) on an errand at the direction of the minor's
parent or guardian, without any detour or stop;
(c) in a motor vehicle involved in interstate travel;
(d) engaged in an employment activity, or going to or
returning from home from an employment activity,
without any detour or stop;
(e) involved in an emergency;
(f) on the sidewalk abutting the minor's residence or
abutting the residence of a next-door neighbor if the
neighbor did not complain to the police department
about the minor's presence;
(g) attending an official school, religious, or other
recreational activity supervised by adults and
sponsored by the City of North Richland Hills, a civic
organization, or another similar entity that takes
responsibility for the minor, or going to or returning
home without any detour or stop an official school,
religious, or other recreational activity supervised by
adults and sponsored by the City of North Richland
Hills, a civic organization, or another similar entity
that takes responsibility for the minor;
(h) exercising First Amendment rights protected by the
United states Constitution, such as the free exercise
of religion, freedom of speech, and the right of
Curfew Ordinance - Page 3
assembly; or
.
(i) married or had been married or had disabilities of
minority removed in accordance with Chapter 31 of the
Texas Family Code.
(2) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection 2(3)
that the owner, operator, or employee of an establishment
promptly notified the pOlice department that a minor was
present on the premises of the establishment during curfew
hours and refused to leave.
4. Enforcement
Before taking any enforcement action under this
Section, an officer shall ask the apparent offender's age
and reason for being in the public place. The officer shall
not issue a citation or make an arrest under this section
unless the officer reasonably believes that an offense has
occurred and that, based on any response and other
circumstances, no defense in the Subsection 3 is present.
5.
Penalties
.
(1) A person who violates a prov~s~on of this Section is
guilty of a separate offense for each day or part of a day
during which the violation is committed continued, or
permitted. Each offense, upon conviction, is punishable by
a fine not to exceed $500.
(2) When required by Section 51.08 of the Texas Family
Code, as amended, the municipal court shall waive original
jurisdiction over a minor who violates Subsection 2(1) of
this Section shall refer the minor to juvenile court.
6. Cumulative provision
This ordinance shall be cumulative of all ordinances of
the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, except where the
provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the
provisions of such ordinances in which even the conflicting
provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed.
7. Severability
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the city
Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and
sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase,
clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance
shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or
.
Curfew Ordinance - Page 4
.
.
.
decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining
phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this
ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the
City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of
any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph or section.
8.
Penalty for violation
9.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys,
omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the
enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall
be fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for
each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to
exist shall constitute a separate offense.
Bffective Date
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage and publication as required by law,
and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 11th day of July, 1994.
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
Tommy Brown, Mayor
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City
Curfew Ordinance - Page 5
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning and Inspections
Council Meeting Date:
7/11/94
Subject: Consideration of an amendment to the Electrical Ordinance
No. 1781 regarding Electrical License Examinations.
Agenda Number:
GN 94-78
Ordinance No. 1993
The City of North Richland Hills is one of several municipalities that has utilized the services of the Tarrant County Electrical
Examining Board to conduct testing of electricians for electrical licenses. Until recently, this voluntary association has functioned for
a number of years as the organization which conducted testing and grading of examinations for the various levels of electrical
licenses. However, this process has become an administrative burden on the municipal staff of the City of Fort Worth which has
provided the administrative and clerical support since the inception of the Tarrant County Electrical Examining Board. Due to
shrinking budgets and increased work loads, the city can no longer provide these services.
The Executive Board of the North Central Texas Council of Governments has authorized the engagement of the Southern Building
Code Congress International, Inc. to prepare, administer, and grade the electrical examinations. There are no costs to the city for
these services since each electrician will pay an examination fee for taking the appropriate examination. This process will not impact
any existing relationships with other communities for recognizing electrical licenses issued under prevailing reciprocal agreements.
Attached is proposed ordinance number 1993 which modifies the North Richland Hills Electrical Code to allow the City Manager or
his designee to execute the appropriate documents to allow the North Central Texas Council of Governments to conduct electrical
exams for licenses issued by the City of North Richland Hills. Electrical licenses issued by North Richland Hills which are based on
electrical exams taken prior to the adoption of Ordinance 1993 will continue to be recognized in the future.
RECOMMENDATION:
t is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 1993.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
g¡:;~ting Budget Ð--v- (J, A ~ ~
'I~~()~ VV~ £!1r:T-~
Depart'fnint Head Signature I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
.
ORDINANCE NO. 1993
.
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING
ORDINANCE # 1781, THE ELECTRICAL ORDINANCE, REGARDING
ELECTRICAL LICENSE EXAMINATION PROCEDURES; TO DELETE ALL
REFERENCE TO THE TARRANT COUNTY ELECTRICAL EXAMINING
BOARD; BY PROVIDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY AUTHORIZE
THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS APPOINTED DESIGNEE TO CONTRACT
WITH AN EXAMINING AGENCY TO PERFORM EXAMINATION SERVICES
AS THE CITY'S OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED EXAMINING AGENCY; BY
PROVIDING THAT IN THE ALTERNATIVE, THE CITY COUNCIL MAY
AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS APPOINTED DESIGNEE TO
CONTRACT WITH OTHER CITIES IN THE NORTH TEXAS REGION TO
RETAIN THE SERVICES OF AN EXAMINING AGENCY TO PERFORM
EXAMINA TIONS AS THE CITY'S OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED EXAMINING
AGENCY; BY PROVIDING THAT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE
AUTHORIZED TO APPROVE OTHER EXAMINING AGENCIES WHOSE
CERTIFICATIONS OF EXAMINATION SHALL BE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY
IN LIEU OF THE CERTIFICATE OF EXAMINATION ISSUED BY THE CITY'S
OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED EXAMINING AGENCY, SUCH AGENCIES TO
BE DESIGNATED AS AL TERNA TE EXAMINING AGENCIES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SA VINGS CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills adopted a new electrical ordinance number
1781 on February 10, 1992, and
WHEREAS, the electrical ordinance contained provisions for electrical license
examinations, and
WHEREAS, the electrical ordinance recognized the Tarrant County Electrical Examining
Board as the official examining agency, and
WHEREAS, this amendment to the electrical ordinance in cooperation with the North
Central Texas Council of Governments Regional Codes Coordinating Committee will
help protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of North Richland
Hills; now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
.
THAT, Section 20.3.A ELECTRICAL LICENSE REQUIRED shall be amended to read
as follows:
.
agency which does not maintain examination standards at least equal to those
required by this code.
4.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City
Council that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are
severable, and if any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall
be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of
competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any
remaining sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance, since the
same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this
ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional section, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase.
s.
SA VINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance 1781, The Electrical Ordinance of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and
except as amended by this ordinance.
.
6.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 11TH DAY OF
JULY, 1994
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM LEGALITY:
.
A TTORNEY FOR THE CITY
, ,
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Finance Counci I Meeting Date: July 11, 1994
Subject: Consideration of Action on all Matters Pertaining to the Award Agenda Number: GN 94-79
and Sale of $3,895,000 in Sales Tax Revenue Bonds
for Park and Recreation Purposes - Resolution #94-31
The Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation Board of Directors will meet prior to the City
Council meeting July 11, 1994 and will receive bids for the sale of $3,895,000 in Sales Tax Revenue
Bonds for Parks and Recreational purposes. The Corporation Board will be taking action not only to award
the bid for the sale of the bonds, but also to approve the necessary documents to authorize the issuance,
approve the paying agent/registrar, and the Financing/Use Agreement. It is necessary for the City Council
to ratify the actions of the Park and Recreation Facilities Corporation Board and to pass a resolution
approving the Corporation's issuance of such bonds and execution of the Financing/Use Agreement.
Mr. David Medanich of First South'NSst Company and our Bond Counsel, Mr. Ed Esquivel of Fulbright and
J8'M>rski will be present to discuss these matters and actions necessary to be taken by Council. On June
23 and 24 representatives from City of North Richland Hills met with bond rating agencies, Moody's, and
Standard and Poor's, to discuss the projects, economy I and financing plan for the projects. Moody's has
notified us that they are retaining their A rating for these bonds. We anticipate that Standard and Poor's
will announce their ratings at least by the end of this week. We will FAX Council the Standard and Poor's
rating results. We expect to at least maintain our current rating.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council ratify the actions of the Park and
Recreation Facilities Corporation Board in conjunction with the sale of Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series
1994, approve Resolution 94- 31, and approve the Financing/Use Agreement.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.) _
Operating Budget _
Other > _
~~ignature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
~~
City Manager
, FInance Duector
Page 1 of
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-.ll..
A RESOLUTION by the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas, relating to the "North
Richland Hills Park and Recreation Facilities
Development Corporation Sales Tax Revenue Bonds,
Series 1994"; approving (i) the resolution of the
Corporation authorizing the issuance of such Bonds
and (ii) the execution, on behalf of the City, of
the Financing/Use Agreement relating to such
financing by the Corporation; resolving other
matters incident and related to the issuance, sale
and delivery of such Bonds; and providing an
effective date.
WHEREAS, North Richland Hills Park and Recreation Facilities
Development Corporation (the "Issuer") was created by the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas (the "City"), pursuant to the
provisions of section 4B of the Development Corporation Act of
1979, Article 5190.6, Vernon's Texas civil Statutes, as amended
(the "Act"); and
WHEREAS. the Issuer is empowered, on behalf of the City, to
issue bonds for the purpose of providing parks and park facilities,
ball parks, open space improvements, and other facilities permitted
by Section 4B of the Act; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Issuer has determined
that $3,895,000 in principal amount of Bonds should be sold and
issued at this time to finance the costs of park and recreational
projects, including (i) Phase II construction of Family Aquatic
Park, (ii) construction of a tennis center/multiple athletic
complex and appurtenant recreation facilities, (iii) design and
construction of hike and bike trails and (iv) general improvements
to city, community and neighborhood parks, including the purchase
of land (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Issuer and the City has each found the Project to
be required or suitable for the use for sports, entertainment and
public park purposes; and
WHEREAS, section 25(f} of the Act requires the City Council of
the City approve the resolution of the Issuer providing for the
issuance of the Bonds no more than sixty (60) days prior to the
delivery of the Bonds; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
0182961
.
section 1: The Resolution authorizing the issuance of
$3,895,000 "North Richland Hills Park and Recreation Facilities
Development Corporation Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 1994", to
be adopted by the Issuer (the "Issuer Resolution") on July 11,
1994, as presented and submitted to the City Council, is hereby
approved in all respects. The Bonds are being issued to finance
the construction of the Project, which will be located within the
City of North Richland Hills, and the city agrees that upon receipt
of the proceeds of sale of the Bonds from the Issuer, the City will
construct the Project and thereafter be fully responsible for the
upkeep, maintenance and use of the Project.
Section 2: The approvals herein given are in accordance with
Section 25(f) of the Act and section 6 of Article IV of the Bylaws
of the Corporation, and the Bonds shall never be construed an
indebtedness or pledge of the City, or the State of Texas (the
"State"), within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory
provision, and the owner of the Bonds shall never be paid in whole
or in part out of any funds raised or to be raised by taxation
(other than sales tax proceeds as authorized pursuant to Section 4B
of the Act) or any other revenues of the Issuer, the City, or the
State, except those revenues assigned and pledged by the Issuer
Resolution.
.
section 3: The City hereby agrees to promptly collect and
remit to the Issuer the Gross Sales Tax Revenues (as defined in
the Issuer Resolution) in accordance with the terms of the Issuer
Resolution and the Act to provide for the prompt payment of the
Bonds, and to assist and cooperate with the Issuer in the
enforcement and collection of sales and use taxes imposed on
behalf of the Issuer.
.
Section 4: The Financing/Use Agreement by and between the
City and the Issuer in relation to the Project, attached hereto as
Exhibit A and incorporated by reference as a part of this
resolution for all purposes, with respect to the duties,
responsibilities and obligations of the City and Issuer during the
time the Bonds are outstanding, is hereby approved as to form and
substance, and the Mayor and the ci ty Secretary are hereby
authorized to execute and deliver such agreement for and on behalf
of the City and as the act and deed of this City Council.
Furthermore, the Mayor and the ci ty Secretary and the other
officers of the City are hereby authorized, jointly and severally,
to execute and deliver such endorsements, instruments,
certif icates, documents, or papers necessary and advisable to
carry out the intent and purposes of this Resolution.
section 5: The City hereby acknowledges and recognizes that
the Bonds are being issued as tax exempt obligations under and
pursuant to section 103(a) of the Code (as defined below) and the
proceeds of sale of such Bonds are to be deposited with the City
following their receipt by the Issuer and the City shall have full
control and responsibility with respect to the construction of the
0182961
-2-
.
.
.
Project and the investment and disbursement of the proceeds of
sale of the Bonds. Therefore, as a result of the foregoing, the
City hereby makes the following representations and warranties to
the Issuer:
(a) Definitions. When used in this Section, the following
terms have the following meanings:
"Closing Date" means the date on which the Bonds
are first authenticated and delivered to the initial
purchasers against payment therefor.
"Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended by all legislation, if any, effecti ve on or
before the Closing Date.
"computation Date" has the meaning set forth in
Section 1.148-1(b) of the Regulations.
"Gross Proceeds" means any proceeds as defined in
section 1.148-1(b) of the Regulations, and any
replacement proceeds as defined in Section 1.148-1 (c) of
the Regulations, of the Bonds.
"Investment" has the meaning set forth in Section
1.148-1{b) of the Regulations.
"Nonpurpose Investment" means any investment
property, as defined in section 148{b) of the Code, in
which Gross Proceeds of the Bonds are invested and which
is not acquired to carry out the governmental purposes
of the Bonds.
"Rebate Amount" has the meaning set forth in
section 1.148-1{b) of the Regulations.
"Regulations" means any proposed, temporary, or
final Income Tax Regulations issued pursuant to Sections
103 and 141 through 150 of the Code, and 103 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1954, which are applicable to
the Bonds. Any reference to any specific Regulation
shall also mean, as appropriate, any proposed, temporary
or final Income Tax Regulation designed to supplement,
amend or replace the specific Regulation referenced.
"Yield" of (I) any Investment has the meaning set
forth in section 1.148-5 of the Regulations and (2) the
Bonds has the meaning set forth in Section 1.148-4 of
the Regulations.
(b) Not to Cause Interest to Become Taxable. The City shall
not use, permit the use of, or omit to use Gross Proceeds or any
other amounts (or any property the acquisition, construction or
0182961
-3-
.
improvement of which is to be financed directly or indirectly with
Gross Proceeds) in a manner which if made or omitted,
respectively, would cause the interest on any Bond to become
includable in the gross income, as defined in section 61 of the
Code, of the owner thereof for federal income tax purposes.
without limiting the generality of the foregoing, unless and until
the City receives a written opinion of counsel nationally
recognized in the field of municipal bond law to the effect that
failure to comply with such covenant will not adversely affect the
exemption from federal income tax of the interest on any Bond, the
City shall comply with each of the specific covenants in this
Section.
(c) No Private Use or Private Pavments. Except as permitted
by section 141 of the Code and the Regulations and rulings
thereunder, the City shall at all times prior to the last Stated
Maturity of Bonds:
.
(1) exclusively own, operate and possess all
property the acquisition, construction or improvement of
which is to be financed or refinanced directly or
indirectly with Gross Proceeds of the Bonds, and not use
or permit the use of such Gross Proceeds (including all
contractual arrangements with terms different than those
applicable to the general public) or any property
acquired, constructed or improved with such Gross
Proceeds in any activity carried on by any person or
entity (including the United States or any agency,
department and instrumentality thereof) other than a
state or local government, unless such use is solely as
a member of the general public; and
(2) not directly or indirectly impose or accept
any charge or other payment by any person or entity who
is treated as using Gross Proceeds of the Bonds or any
property the acquisition, construction or improvement of
which is to be financed or refinanced directly or
indirectly with such Gross Proceeds, other than taxes of
general application within the City or interest earned
on investments acquired with such Gross Proceeds pending
application for their intended purposes.
.
(d) No Private Loan. Except to the extent permitted by
section 141 of the Code and the Regulations and rulings
thereunder, the City shall not use Gross Proceeds of the Bonds to
make or finance loans to any person or entity other than a state
or local government. For purposes of the foregoing covenant, such
Gross Proceeds are considered to be "loaned" to a person or entity
if: (1) property acquired, constructed or improved with such Gross
Proceeds is sold or leased to such person or entity in a
transaction which creates a debt for federal income tax purposes;
(2) capacity in or service from such property is committed to such
person or entity under a take-or-pay, output or similar contract
01829ð1
-4-
.
or arrangement; or (3) indirect benefits, or burdens and benefits
of ownership, of such Gross Proceeds or any property acquired,
constructed or improved with such Gross Proceeds are otherwise
transferred in a transaction which is the economic equivalent of
a loan.
(e) Not to Invest at Hiaher Yield. Except to the extent
permitted by section 148 of the Code and the Regulations and
rulings thereunder, the City shall not at any time prior to the
final Stated Maturity of the Bonds directly or indirectly invest
Gross Proceeds in any Investment (or use Gross Proceeds to replace
money so invested), if as a result of such investment the Yield
from the Closing Date of all Investments acquired with Gross
Proceeds (or with money replaced thereby), whether then held or
previously disposed of, exceeds the Yield of the Bonds.
(f) Not Federallv Guaranteed. Except to the extent
permitted by section 149(b) of the Code and the Regulations and
rulings thereunder, the City shall not take or omit to take any
action which would cause the Bonds to be federally guaranteed
within the meaning of section 149(b) of the Code and the
Regulations and rulings thereunder.
.
(g) Payment of Rebatable Arbitraae. Except to the extent
otherwise provided in section 148(f) of the Code and the
Regulations and rulings thereunder:
(1) The City shall account for all Gross Proceeds
(including all receipts, expenditures and investments
thereof) on its books of account separately and apart
from all other funds (and receipts, expenditures and
investments thereof) and shall retain all records of
accounting for at least six years after the day on which
the last outstanding Bond is discharged. However, to
the extent permitted by law, the City may commingle
Gross Proceeds of the Bonds with other money of the
ci ty , provided that the City separately accounts for
each receipt and expenditure of Gross Proceeds and the
obligations acquired therewith.
(2) Not less frequently than each Computation
Date, the City shall calculate the Rebate Amount in
accordance with rules set forth in section 148(f) of the
Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder. The
City shall maintain such calculations with its official
transcript of proceedings relating to the issuance of
the Bonds until six years after the final Computation
Date.
.
(3) As additional consideration for the purchase
of the Bonds by the Purchasers and the loan of the money
represented thereby and in order to induce such purchase
by measures designed to insure the excludability of the
0182961
-5-
.
.
.
interest thereon from the gross income of the owners
thereof for federal income tax purposes, the City shall
remit to the Issuer for payment to the United states the
amount described in paragraph (3) above and the amount
described in paragraph (4) below, at the times, in the
manner and accompanied by such forms or other
information as is or may be required by Section 14S(f)
of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder.
(4) The City shall exercise reasonable diligence
to assure that no errors are made in the calculations
and payments required by paragraph (2), and if an error
is made, to discover and promptly correct such error
within a reasonable amount of time thereafter (and in
all events within one hundred eighty (lS0) days after
discovery of the error), including the amount remitted
to the Issuer for payment to the United states of any
additional Rebate Amount owed to it, interest thereon,
and any penalty imposed under Section 1.14S-3(h) of the
Regulations.
section 6: It is officially found, determined, and declared
that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the
public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of
the public business to be considered at such meeting, including
this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Article 6252-17,
Vernon's Texas civil Statutes, as amended.
Section 7: This Resolution shall be in force and effect
from and after its passage on the date shown below.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, this July 11, 1994.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
(City Seal)
0182961
-6-
EXHIBIT A
.
FINANCING/USE AGREEMENT
This Financing/Use Agreement (this "Agreement') is made to be
effective as of the 11th day of July, 1994, by and between the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, a duly incorporated and existing
municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of
Texas (the "City") and the North Richland Hills Parks and
Recreation Facilities Development Corporation, a non-profit
industrial development corporation organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Texas, including Vernon's Ann. Ci v. st.,
Section 4B of Article 5190.6, (the "Corporation")
R E C I TAL S
WHEREAS, the Corporation on behalf of the City is to finance
park and recreational projects, including (i) Phase II construction
of Family Aquatic Park, (ii) construction of a tennis
center/multiple athletic complex and appurtenant recreation
facilities, (iii) design and construction of hike and bike trails
and (iv) general improvements to city, community and neighborhood
parks, including the purchase of land (the "Project"); and
.
WHEREAS, such financing contemplates the issuance and sale of
the Corporation's tax exempt bonds in the principal amount of
$3,895,000, and the proceeds of sale are to be used by the City to
design and construct the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City will have full responsibility for the design
and construction of the Project and the Corporation shall have no
duties or responsibilities with respect to the Project other than
to provide for the financing of its costs;
AGREEMENT
.
1. Financinq of proiect: For and in consideration of the
City's covenants and agreements herein contained and subject to the
terms contained herein, the Corporation hereby agrees to issue and
sale a series of obligations to be known as "North Richland Hills
Park and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation Sales-Tax
Revenue Bonds, Series 1994", hereinafter called the "Bonds", and
deposit the proceeds of sale of the Bonds to a construction fund or
account to be designated by the City, and the City hereby agrees
and covenants that all proceeds of sale deposited to the credit of
such construction account shall be used solely to pay the costs of
the Project.
2. Use of Proiect. Until all the Bonds have been fully paid,
discharged and retired, the upkeep and maintenance of the Project
will be the responsibility of the City and the corporation shall
have no responsibility with respect to the operation, upkeep and
maintenance of the Project.
0182946
.
3. Collection and Transfer of Proceeds of Sales Tax. The
City agrees, in cooperation with the Corporation, to take such
actions as are required to cause the "Gross Sales Tax Revenues" (as
such term is defined in the resolution authorizing the issuance of
the Bonds) received from the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the
State of Texas for and on behalf of the Corporation to be
transferred and deposited immediately upon receipt by the City to
the credit of the banking or monetary fund maintained at the
depository designated by the Corporation and known on the books and
records of the Corporation as the "Pledged Revenue Fund".
4. Recoqnition of Tax Exempt Financinq. The City hereby
acknowledges and recognizes that the Bonds are being issued as
"state or local bonds" under and pursuant to section 103(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the City hereby
covenants and agrees with respect to the use of proceeds of sale of
the Bonds and the use of the Project as follows:
(a) Definitions. When used in this Section, the following
terms have the following meanings:
"Closing Date" means the date on which the Bonds are
first authenticated and delivered to the initial
purchasers against payment therefor.
.
"Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended by all legislation, if any, effective on or
before the Closing Date.
"Computation Date" has the meaning set forth in
section 1.148-1(b) of the Regulations.
"Gross Proceeds" means any proceeds as defined in
Section 1.148-1 (b) of the Regulations, and any
replacement proceeds as defined in Section 1.148-1(c) of
the Regulations, of the Bonds.
"Investment" has the meaning set forth in Section
1.148-1(b) of the Regulations.
"Nonpurpose Investment" means any investment
property, as defined in section 148(b) of the Code, in
which Gross Proceeds of the Bonds are invested and which
is not acquired to carry out the governmental purposes of
the Bonds.
"Rebate Amount" has the meaning set forth in Section
1.148-1(b) of the Regulations.
.
"Regulations" means any proposed, temporary, or
final Income Tax Regulations issued pursuant to Sections
103 and 141 through 150 of the Code, and 103 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1954, which are applicable to
the Bonds. Any reference to any specif ic Regulation
0182946
-2-
EXHIBIT A
·
shall also mean, as appropriate, any proposed, temporary
or final Income Tax Regulation designed to supplement,
amend or replace the specific Regulation referenced.
"Yield" of (1) any Investment has the meaning set
forth in Section 1.148-5 of the Regulations and (2) the
Bonds has the meaning set forth in Section 1.148-4 of the
Regulations.
(b) Not to Cause Interest to Become Taxable. The City shall
not use, permit the use of, or omit to use Gross Proceeds or any
other amounts (or any property the acquisition, construction or
improvement of which is to be financed directly or indirectly with
Gross Proceeds) in a manner which if made or omitted, respectively,
would cause the interest on any Bond to become includable in the
gross income, as defined in section 61 of the Code, of the owner
thereof for federal income tax purposes. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, unless and until the City receives a
written opinion of counsel nationally recognized in the field of
municipal bond law to the effect that failure to comply with such
covenant will not adversely affect the exemption from federal
income tax of the interest on any Bond, the City shall comply with
each of the specific covenants in this Section.
·
(c) No Private Use or Private Pavrnents. Except as permitted
by section 141 of the Code and the Regulations and rulings
thereunder, the City shall at all times prior to the last Stated
Maturity of Bonds:
(I) exclusively own, operate and possess all
property the acquisition, construction or improvement of
which is to be financed or refinanced directly or
indirectly with Gross Proceeds of the Bonds, and not use
or permit the use of such Gross Proceeds (including all
contractual arrangements with terms different than those
applicable to the general pUblic) or any property
acquired, constructed or improved with such Gross
Proceeds in any acti vi ty carried on by any person or
entity (including the united States or any agency,
department and instrumentality thereof) other than a
state or local government, unless such use is solely as -
a member of the general public; and
·
(2) not directly or indirectly impose or accept any
charge or other payment by any person or entity who is
treated as using Gross Proceeds of the Bonds or any
property the acquisition, construction or improvement of
which is to be financed or refinanced directly or
indirectly with such Gross Proceeds, other than taxes of
general application wi thin the City or interest earned on
investments acquired with such Gross Proceeds pending
application for their intended purposes.
0182946
-3-
Et:_H~BiT 1\
·
(d) No Private Loan. Except to the extent permitted by
section 141 of the Code and the Regulations and rulings thereunder,
the City shall not use Gross Proceeds of the Bonds to make or
finance loans to any person or entity other than a state or local
government. For purposes of the foregoing covenant, such Gross
Proceeds are considered to be "loaned" to a person or entity if:
( 1) property acquired, constructed or improved with such Gross
Proceeds is sold or leased to such person or entity in a
transaction which creates a debt for federal income tax purposes;
(2) capacity in or service from such property is committed to such
person or entity under a take-or-pay, output or similar contract or
arrangement; or (3) indirect benefits, or burdens and benefits of
ownership, of such Gross Proceeds or any property acquired,
constructed or improved with such Gross Proceeds are otherwise
transferred in a transaction which is the economic equivalent of a
loan.
·
(e) Not to Invest at Hiqher Yield. Except to the extent
permitted by section 148 of the Code and the Regulations and
rulings thereunder, the City shall not at any time prior to the
final stated Maturity of the Bonds directly or indirectly invest
Gross Proceeds in any Investment (or use Gross Proceeds to replace
money so invested), if as a result of such investment the Yield
from the Closing Date of all Investments acquired with Gross
Proceeds (or with money replaced thereby), whether then held or
previously disposed of, exceeds the Yield of the Bonds.
(f) Not Federallv Guaranteed. Except to the extent permitted
by section 149 (b) of the Code and the Regulations and rulings
thereunder, the City shall not take or omit to take any action
which would cause the Bonds to be federally guaranteed within the
meaning of section 149 (b) of the Code and the Regulations and
rulings thereunder.
(g) Payment of Rebatable Arbitraqe. Except to the extent
otherwise provided in section 148(f) of the Code and the
Regulations and rulings thereunder:
(1) The City shall account for all Gross Proceeds
(including all receipts, expenditures and investments
thereof) on its books of account separately and apart-
from all other funds (and receipts, expendi tures and
investments thereof) and shall retain all records of
accounting for at least six years after the day on which
the last Outstanding Bond is discharged. However, to the
extent permitted by law, the City may commingle Gross
Proceeds of the Bonds with other money of the ci ty ,
provided that the City separately accounts for each
receipt and expenditure of Gross Proceeds and the
obligations acquired therewith.
·
(2) Not less frequently than each Computation Date,
the City shall calculate the Rebate Amount in accordance
with rules set forth in section 148(f) of the Code and
0182946
-4-
EXHIBlT A
.
the Regulations and rulings thereunder. The City shall
maintain such calculations with its official transcript
of proceedings relating to the issuance of the Bonds
until six years after the final Computation Date.
(3) As additional consideration for the purchase of
the Bonds by the Purchasers and the use of the money
represented thereby and in order to induce such purchase
by measures designed to insure the excludability of the
interest thereon from the gross income of the owners
thereof for federal income tax purposes, the City shall
remit to the Corporation for payment to the United states
the amount described in paragraph (g) (2) above and the
amount described in paragraph (g) (4) below, at the times,
in the manner and accompanied by such forms or other
information as is or may be required by Section 148(f) of
the Code and the Regulations and rUlings thereunder.
(4) The City shall exercise reasonable diligence to
assure that no errors are made in the calculations and
payments required by paragraph (g) (2), and if an error is
made, to discover and promptly correct such error within
a reasonable amount of time thereafter (and in all events
within one hundred eighty (180) days after discovery of
the error), including the amount remitted to the
Corporation for payment to the United States of any
additional Rebate Amount owed to it, interest thereon,
and any penalty imposed under Section 1.148-3(h) of the
Regulations.
.
5. Modifications. This Agreement shall not be changed
orally, and no executory agreement shall be effective to waive,
change, modify or discharge this Agreement in whole or in part
unless such executory agreement is in writing and is signed by the
parties against whom enforcement of any waiver, change,
modification or discharge is sought.
6. Entire Aareement. This Agreement, including the
Exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the parties
pertaining to the subject matter hereof and fully supersedes all
prior agreements and understandings between the parties pertai~ing
to such subject matter.
.
7. Counteroarts. This Agreement may be executed in several
counterparts, and all such executed counterparts shall constitute
the same agreement. It shall be necessary to account for only one
such counterpart in proving this Agreement.
8. Severabilitv. If any provision of this Agreement is
determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or
unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall nonetheless
remain in full force and effect.
0182946
-5-
EXHI~T ~
·
·
·
9. ADDlicable Law. This Agreement shall in all respects be
governed by, and construed in accordance with, the substantive
federal laws of the United states and the laws of the State of
Texas.
10. Ca~tions. The section headings appearing in this
Agreement are for convenience of reference only and are not
intended, to any extent and for any purpose, to limit or define the
text of any section or any subsection hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement to be effective as of the date and year first above
written.
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PARK AND RECREATION
FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
ATTEST:
President
Secretary
(Corporation Seal)
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Secretary
(City Seal)
0182946
-6-
EXHIBlT A
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: July 11, 1994
Subject: Amendment to Contract with Texas Department of TransportationAgenda Number: ON 94-80
for NETS Program
The City of North Richland Hills has been contracting for several years with the Texas Department of
Transportation as the sponsoring local agency for grant funds for the Northeast Transportation Service
(NETS). NETS provides transportation services for disabled and elderly in the northeast Tarrant County
area, and this grant with the Texas Department of Transportation provides a significant portion of the
operating expenses.
The current contract with the State ends August 31, and NETS has requested a contract extension to
January 31, 1995, primarily to take advantage of ordering two vans and providing sufficient time to get
them billed within the contract period.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council authorize the approval of this amendment for
the NETS contract extending the time to January 31, 1995.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Sufficient Funds Available.
Operating B.udge. t - >W~
Other .._ ~ ~~
~~~ature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Director
Page 1 of
.
RECIPIENT: City of North Richland Hills
PROJECT NO.: TX94-0002( 2)
STATE CONTRACf NO.: 514XXF6020
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACf
NO.1
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TRAVIS §
THIS AMENDMENT TO CONTRACf made by and between the State of Texas
acting by and through the Texas Department of Transportation hereinafter called the "State",
and the City of North Richland Hills hereinafter called the "Conttactor".
WITNESSETH
.
WHEREAS, on September 1, 1993, a conttact was entered into by and between the
above-mentioned parties, which contract provided for the expenditure of funds pursuant to the
provisions of Section 9 of the Federal Transit Act for a public ttansportation project; and
WHEREAS, both the State and the Contractor have agreed to extend the contract
period in order to expend obligated funds; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth, the
parties hereto agree to amend the above-mentioned contract as follows:
I. Article 1, page 1, sentence 1 is revised to read: "This conttact becomes
effective on the final date of execution by the State's Director of Public Transportation and
shall tenninate on January 31, 1995 unless otherwise terminated or modified as hereinafter
provided. "
II. All of the other tenns, conditions and provisions of the original contract shall
remain in full force and effect.
.
~-~---
. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presénts to be executed.
.
.
STATE OF TEXAS
Certified as being executed for the
purpose and effect of activating and/or
carrying out the order, established
policies or work programs heretofore
approved and authorized by the
Texas Transportation Commission under
the authority of Minute Order 102550.
APPROVED:
By:
Director of Public Transportation
Date:
RECOMMENDED FOR EXECUTION:
District Engineer, Fort Worth District
CITY OF NORm RICHLAND HILLS
By:
Title:
Date:
Signat\.
RequirE
Signa t~
Require!
I
.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Public Works Council Meeting Date:
Approve Amundson Road Right-of-Way Dedication and
Abandonment - Ordinance No 1 c}c}1 Agenda Number:
7/11/94
Subject:
GN 94-81
Right-of-way (ROW) for the future Amundson Road between Newman Drive and Cannon Drive was
originally dedicated along the eastern portion of Holiday East Mobile Home Park Addition (known as
LaCasita Mobile Home Park) by plat.
When Spring Oaks Addition, north of LaCasita Mobile Home Park, was platted in July 1992, the
alignment of Amundson Road was shifted east from the LaCasita road alignment. The owner/developer
of Spring Oaks agreed to initiate the change in the Amundson Road ROW on the east side of the mobile
home park.
The owners of LaCasita Mobile Home Park have dedicated the new ROW for the realignment of
Amundson Road (see attached). The Public Works Department sees no existing or future use for the
ROW to the abandoned. An ordinance vacating and abandoning the existing ROW is attached for Council
approval.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that Council approve the right-of-way dedication from the owners of LaCasita Mobile
Home Park for the revised Amundson Road alignment and approve Ordinance No. 1991 vacating and
abandoning the existing right-of-way.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
t:}1~
Ignatu e I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Dlrec10r
Page 1 of
.
.
.
---
---
TR "2 =t
~7~Ç_ _ _
TO .
o .'2!1
TR 2..
N.'. ,
T. ,
11.0" ~. .. ~ ~ ~
eARL.g~
J. SLJRV~O
V13
I
I
TR I
,....... .
'( £,,~ ,,~t<
,",01..10",",01'4£
1'4061\..£ @:JP
~;,ht - af- Wa':J
Re.caiveJ
&2
/I";'¿:;"~~_~ 3 ~~~
'~--'.\ eARL. '<;'
1 ,;, 11' t!:" , ,
" , , ,.jtJp.lJt:.o' ~'
1t1.,W--";' v13 ,~ 1'40
L/þ'-;r-=-- -O~ 'i~þ.~'5;"
....~'\":.._____ O!\... 4O'd'~ r ," I
~------_t! ~, p " ,:..1 "",I
, -, ~08¡R!I-'~c.,;,
~ -----
1
"
---------
TA.7
--~-
R.i9ht - of - Way
TA.S
40.47 .
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO. 1991
AN ORDINANCE V ACA TING THE DEDICATION OF APART OF THE RIGHT -OF-
WAY IN THE HOLIDAY EAST MOBILE HOME PARK ADDITION.
WHEREAS, the plat of Holiday East Mobile Home Park Addition, which is recorded in Vol. 388-
67, P. 32 of Plat Records of Tarrant County,Texas, shows and identifies the dedication of the right-of-
way for a public street approximately 60 feet in width from the south boundary line to the north boundary
line of said addition; and
WHEREAS, the thoroughfare plans of the City of North Richland Hills have changed and a
portion of such right-of-way is no longer needed and the Council finds that portion described below will
not be needed as right-of-way in the future.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, that:
1.
The dedication of that portion of the right-of-way described in Exhibit "A" and "B", attached
hereto and made part hereof by reference, be and are hereby vacated in favor of the owner of said
addition known as Holiday East Mobile Home Park Addition, to the City of North Richland Hills,
Tarrant County, Texas.
2.
The above vacation of the above described 0.413 acre tract in favor of the owner of said addition
is done in consideration of the execution of a right-of-way deed of 0.457 acre tract from the owner of said
addition to the City of North Richland Hills.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 11th day of July, 1994.
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City
.
TRUSTEES. E- SYSTEM. INC.
POOL TRUST
VOL. 7862. PG. 1578 D.R.T.C.T.
1 n = 100'
W
~~I~N
J: . ~:ß
g~ QO-
o UJ·
..J . ~o
~~ f~
z .Iñ
J: ua:l
o <
"") ..J
~
.,..,.,. INC.
S'I'SIt..1'I'.
£.-
RUS~(S' :í
1 POOL ·n~\JS 0 R.1·C.1.
pG ,~78 .
VOL. 7862. .
.
~~
:p Q.~ ~
I..tJ ~ (i
J... ~ Q.
ð2~'
ò' 0 ~
.:¡:~4>
@~
~2
lJ. - 19"50'01·
R- 1011.50·
L- 350.14'
0.457 AC.
PROPOSED R.O.W.
;
.¡
::
0'
~
,,~~. .
4,c, ~:~
c:,,, <;) .
<..: ~c:, ro '
c,. "'~ \Ii
"'~~ C'" ~ú·
,,-c, 0
Q:.v ~ (I,(J.
"\ '\~
~Cv
LoI
~
S~
V1":
-0
~-
S
in
~
z
s Ø9"45'ocr W
60.00'
.
',. EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED R.O.W.
OF
0.457 ACRES
IN THE
JOHN BAAL OUCH SURVEY. ASST. NO. 130
JJ::7 CARTER &c BURGESS.It-
L..l:=J IIIODlIIRS· PWlNIRS·StJRVr(c
_ (1J _ -.: · sum: ZIO · IWLAS, TDIAS 1!
.
EXHIBIT B
FIELD NOTES
BEING 0.457 acres land out of the John Barlough Survey, Abstract
No. 130, L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1652, City of North
Richland Hills, Tarrant County Texas, and being a part of the plat
recorded in Volume 388-67, Page 32, Deed Records, Tarrant County
Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as
follows:
COMMENCING at the southeast corner of the aforesaid plat;
THENCE North 00°15 00" West, 500.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE South 89°45 00" West, 60.00 feet;
THENCE North 00°J.5 00" West, 101.22 feet to the beginning of a
curve to the right, having a central angle of 19°51 01", a radius
of 1011.50 feet, and a chord which bears North 09°40 01" East,
348.40 feet;
THENCE along said curb an arc length of 350.14 feet;
THENCE South 00015 00" East, 444.41 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING
and containing 0.457 acres (19,885 square feet) of land, more or
less.
.
91315001.S10
.
.
CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TEXAS
RIGHT-OF-WAY
1 i ~. i99L
STATE OF TEXAS
)(
KNOW AlL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF TARRANT )(
That (/we. Logan A. Boggs, Mary Jane Boggs, Dwight M. Kendall, Dona S. Kendall, William G.
Steele, Jr.. and Barbara T, Steele, coDcd:ively u seDcr, for and in considcration of the agreed purc:basc
price c:i. ODe doDar ($1.00), and upoÐ aD c:i. the tcrms and conditioas hereof, bcrcby grant, scJl and comoey
to thc City of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation of Tarrant County, Tcxas u Buyer, a
perpetual right-of-way for thc purpose of constructing, improving, widening. maintaining and using a public
street with drainagc facilities as may be required and thc furthcr rights to construct, improve, operatc and
maintain water, sewer, or other public utilities in, under or upon said right-of-way, as desaibcd on thc plat
attached hcrcto, which plat is madc a part hcrcof, and/or dcscnòcd as foDows:
(SEE ATTACHED PlAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
(SEE EXHIBIT A AND B)
Thc agreed purchase price includes full accord, satisfaction and compensation for all dcmands of
the Seller, subject also to the following spccia1 conditions, if any: This dedication is subject to the approval
of thc abandonmcnt of thc 0.413 acrc cxisting right-of-way.
To ha\'C and hold thc samc perpctually to the City of North Richland Hills and its s~ and
assigns forc\'Cr.
.
Executed t.his thc
'4 ¡H-
I ~
day of Fe.tvz... U .4 T?- 'r': A.D., 19~.
,/ P ,
By. ~ur\lld . IJ.%y
: . J..4gan A. Bqt p ¿
"-- ' ,
~?{¿{ V~ . .~ 0'.-;.
Mary Jane "Boggs
7\~~'VI.I l) .vk 7,/
, . t M. Kendall
,..(¡/.'" .' ','
Ij. ¿u.lLd. U"--' .J .~~LL
Barbara T. Stec1c
ADDRESS OF GRANTEE:
city of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
STATE OF CAUFORNIA )(
COUNTY OF 1 Q<, A...V--E LD )(
.
This instrumcnt was acknowledged beforc me on this ~ day of [:rt../r....cN--/ . AD., 19 'tV .
by Logan A. Boggs, a tcnant in common of Holiday East Mobilc Homc Park.
~;:bli~~29~~
Commission Expires:
Notary's Printcd Namc:
MARTIE BAYHA
~~~/?-1AK...7/~ /)A>-HÆL-
Lee..... COUNTY
c.-. .... 0IIII. 21. '117 ..
.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
)(
COUNTY OF L .~. f~'U..t::')(
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this /. '7"" t/day of ~(:K.\ ;-'.(--/ . A.D., 19 :'C/ ,
by Mary Sane Boggs, a tenant in common of Holiday East Mobile Home Park..
, .. L> /'
~/;,~c,-< 'Y---/" /' ",¡
Notary Public, State of ~))riUa
Notary's Printed Name:
Commission Expires:
/~- ;:<")- '/ )
'--
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )(
COUNTY OF :{D 6-If.Ll>- )(
MARTIE SA YHA ~
Comm. #1009345
'IIIfV PUIUC .. CAUFOANIAO.
Lea ANCIELE8 COUNTY (j
..... .... Oeo. 25, 1817 ..
. . t.._ J'. [.
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this L..!L........:. day of /-L t'-Ù d, _, . A.D., 19...::::.L,
by Dwight M. Kendall, a tenant in common of Holiday East Mobile Home Park. _ I
) v:/
, -/// ///.. T .. /J::; /" ,.,/
Notary Public, State of California
Commission Expires:
r...:./ ).:/ / tic¡ t.¡
/ '
Notary's Printed Name:
/17
,,-:-;.1.l. j,; ,r ó'1JJ( ~J
.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )(
COUNTY OFd7 /n/J~;..:r~. )(
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this ~ day of L'¿¡;.h /L'<J . AD.. 19~
by Dona S. Kendall, a tenant in common of Holiday East Mobile Home Park.. .
¿f://,¿4:.~
Notary Public, State of California
Commission Expires:
/ì /"C:; ,..,,,,
'i / .."/ I ¡ ~i
I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
)(
Notary's Printed Name:
 i 2ß /
'7"I'7A'<: /~ '&71,('rt
COUNTY OF l c'" ¡:>",t-r"-ð)(
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this Do//¡ day of FE..Jìt!.. \ +ì/'.-¡ . A.D., 19 5JL/ .
by Wtlliam G. Steele, Sr.. a tenant in common of Holiday East Mobile Home Pu,k.
--;//J.¿v~ ~c. ¿
Notary Public, State of Calir~
Commission Expires:
/.;) -.J <:c. //
Notary's Printed Name:
.-?
/'/-'7rY-f:'7/.c .I.-JN ~/ /-/H
.
MARTIE SA YHA ~
Comm. #1009345 f'
MY PUBLIC.. CAUFOANIA;:;
LOS ANOEL.ES COUNTY \.'
Comm. expilea Dec. 25. 1997 ..
.
STATE OF CAUFORNIA )(
COUNTY OF hc" ¡-JÆ (-/ ,j':; )(
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this / __/1-1 day of ~-è ( Jf.: 1-/"1,.< -;: A.D., 19 7l/ .
by Barbara T. Steele, a tenant in common of Holiday East Mobile Home P .ark. .'" ' . L.
'/ '-/ ':z: \
'-_ /' " ,,1 .,
.r. )" , 1", / ' // l.: -- "L--
Notary Public:, Slate of Califo~
Notary's Printed Name:
,
/77r:7,é 7/{c :ž y) y pp
Commission Expires:
.
.
/-}-
-
~ 0/
::;:;: r /
MARTIE SA YHA ~
Comm. #1009345 1
' ARYPUBUC CAUFORN
LOB ANGELES COUNTY
c-. EII Iiree Dee. 26. 1"7 ..
~
(\:. .
Cor,'.."
NOTARY rLJ3L .
LOS ANGE::.I..~:' ",,:)UNTY \
Comm. EXDlrø~ Clec. 25. 1997 --
·
f..- 26·26'35"
R.. 499.04'
L= 230.32'
~
,-" INC.
SiSir..N'·
S t:-
RUS'i"C.E. . ci
'i" Ot. \RÙ:> OR \ C.\·
pO <:.78· . .
~G. 'CJ N 89"~6'00" E
VOL.. 7862. 60.08'
1" = 1 00 t
ð... 23"45'1 Ir
R- 559.04'
La 231.78'
0.413 AC,
R.O.W. ABANDONME
S OO-1S'Ocr E - 101.22
·
HOLIDAY EAST
MOBILE HOME PARK
VOL. 388-67. PG. 32
1
I
1
1
I
I
I ~I
I ~
I ~
I I
~: ~
~I ¡¡::
-., b
I I IØ
~I 8
Lf
~: ~I
001 ~
~~ll
1
v'
~
."-. ..
~""'- v-
[.. '\.
.....- J <¿-.
C, Ç)'
'\
<r.: ~c, ro'
c,. "ç:. t><
,,~«; 0" «c;.
..::,'? <¿0 ().
'\~ <ÒÌ
'\
~ov
·
EXHIBIT A
R.O.W. ABANDONMENT
or
0.413 ACRES
IN THE
JOHN BARLOUGH SURVEY. ABST. NO. 130
'"'In''' RI('HI ANO Hill S
/ gf..... / CARTER & BURGESS.INC.
.... ENGINEERS" PLANNERS . SURVEYORS
7950 ElM BROOK DRIVE · SUITE 250 · DALlAS, TEXAS 7~47
,....., .... ..... .._'" ,....,\ 4110'., ""At'"
.
EXHIBIT B
FIELD NOTES
BEING 0.413 acres of land out of the John Barlough Survey, Abstract
Number 130, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and
being a part of the plat recorded in Volume 388-67, Page 32, Deed
Records Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described
as follow:
COMMENCING at the northeast corner of the said plat;
THENCE South 89 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of
110.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE along a curve to the left, having a delta angle of 23
degrees 24 minutes 34 seconds, an arc distance of 203.89 feet, a
radius of 499.04 feet, and a chord of South 14 degrees 59 minutes
18 seconds East, a distance of 202.48 feet;
THENCE along a curve to the right, having a delta angle of 01
degrees 42 minutes 51 seconds, an arc distance of 16.73 feet, a
radius of 559.04 feet, and a chord of South 25 degrees 50 minutes
09 seconds East, a distance of 16.72 feet;
THENCE along a to the left, having a delta angle of 07 degrees 32
minutes 07 seconds, an arc distance of 133.03 feet, a radius of
1011.50 feet, and a chord of South 3 degrees 31 minutes 03 seconds
West, a distance of 132.93 feet;
.
THENCE South 00 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of
101. 22 feet;
THENCE along a curve to the left, having a delta angle of 26
degrees 26 minutes 35 seconds, an arc distance of 230.32 feet, a
radius of 499.04 feet, and a chord of North 13 degrees 28 minutes
17 seconds West, a distance of 228.28 feet;
THENCE along a curve to the right, having a delta angle of 23
degrees 45 minutes 18 seconds, an arc distance of 231.78 feet, a
radius of 559.04 feet, and a chord of North 14 degrees 48 minutes
56 seconds West, a distance of 230.12 feet;
THENCE North 89 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of
60.08 feet to a point for the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing
0.413 acres of land within the metes recited, more or less.
.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I
It Department:
Agenda Number:
7/11/94
GN 94-82
Subject:
Adm inistration
Appointments to Civil Service Commission
Council Meeting Date:
Places 1,2 and the two Alternate positions on the Civil Service Commission have expired. According to
the Charter, Place 2 will be appointed from a list provided by the city employee associations. Mr. Breen I
has been recommended by both the Police and Fire Associations. The appointments to the Civil Service
Commission are mayoral appointments with confirmation by two-thirds vote of the Council. The following
are recommended for appointment:
Term Expires:
Place 1
Place 2
Alternate
Alternate
Sally Hackfeld
Dennis Breen
Bill Fenimore
Ed Brock
June 1995
June 1995
June 1995
June 1995
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council take action on the proposed appointments.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
_ Operating Budget _
_ Othe' _ ~ I, --'~~
I Department Head S;gnature 1ßanage,
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Director
Page 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Christmas Decorations for City Hall
Council Meeting Date: 7/11/94
Agenda Number: PU 94-53
. Department:
Subject:
Administration
One of the homes in the Diamond Loch Addition has a Christmas display that includes a sled, horses
and trees. The Council Committee in charge of decorations for City Hall would like to use this display
as a pattern. The committee suggests that we purchase a sled, two horses and eleven trees this year.
These are manufactured by the homeowner in Diamond Loch. The total price is $4,150. We need to
order these so they will be ready for the holiday season. There are ample funds in this years budget
for these decorations.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the purchase of additional Christmas Decorations.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number 15-01-04-4800
Sufficient Funds Available
¡efL ~
dtty Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
4Iubject:
Parks & Recreation Department
7-11-94
Council Meeting Date:
Professional Services Contract- Tennis Centerl Athletic Fields
Agenda Number: PU 94-54
Sirice approval of the Lease, Construction, and Joint-Use Agreements between the City of North
Richland Hills and The Birdville Independent School District, at the June 27, 1994 City Council
meeting, staff has negotiated the attached Letter of Agreement with Schrickel, Rollins & Associates
Inc., for professional design services.
The proposed fee, in the amount of $213,300 is approximately 8% of the estimated project
construction cost of $2,649,000.
Completion of the plans and specifications is a critical prerequisite for maintaining project timelines to
accommodate the relocation of the varsity baseball field by next spring.
Fundine Source:
Account # 09-92-18-6000 Tennis Center/RHS Practice Fields
$213,300
e RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council authorize staff to contract the services of Schrickel, Rollins, &
Associates Inc., for the preparation of the design, construction plans, and specifications for the
athletic and recreation facilities at Richland High School.
A IT ACHMENT: Letter of Agreement
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
aC?perating Budget
wother
~\~-~
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
e
e
e
Agreement for
Professional Services between
City of North Richland Hill, Texas
and
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
452i
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
Mr. Bill Thornton, Assistant Director
Parks and Recreation Department
City of North Richland Hills
6720 NE Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Victor \Y Baxter, ¡\SLA
¡'~ent E. 3e)itv, ,-\5L:\
E. 3í~:c!e\', PE
Tem T. Cheek,-\SLA
Terr\ E. Cullender
Dino ). Ferralli, PE
Daniel B. Har:man, PE
,'>Iark C. Hatchel. ASLA
Sanford P LaHue, Jr., PE
Hershel Lind1y, APA
,Albert \.\. Roilins, PE
Gene Scr'rlc~e!. FASLA
Larv D. S~one, PE
LJndsG¡pe Architecture· PIJnning· Engineering
July 1, 1994
RE: Professional Services for Tennis Center and Other Outdoor Recreation Facilities
to be located at Richland High School
Dear Mr. Thornton:
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. (hereinafter abbreviated as SRA) is pleased to provide this
Letter of Agreement to perform Professional Services for the City of North Richland Hills
(hereinafter, CTIY) for the Tennis Center and Other Outdoor Recreation Facilities to be located
at the Richland High School campus of the Birdville Independent School District. The CTIY and
SRA agree as set forth below.
o. Scope of Project Services
0.01 Professional Services for the Project will be administered as two components which
comprise the whole Professional Services:
a.
Project Design Component Part A will include the proposed outdoor
recreation facilities to be on the site of approximately 33 acres which is
located adjacent to the east side of Holiday Lane across thè street and
northeast of the main campus. The location and layout of the facilities will
generally conform to the Concept Plan previously approved by the CTIY and
Birdville I.S.D.
b.
Project Design Component Part B will include the proposed tennis center and
adjacent soccer/football fields which may need relocation and regrading and
related surface drainage between the proposed facilities and the outside
western edge of the existing running track. The location and layout of the
facilities will generally conform to the Concept Plan previously approved by
the CTIY and Birdville I.S.D. The tennis center will be located on land
between the front of the main school building and the access road of I.H.
Loop 820.
4S2i
1
1161 Corporate Drive West. Suite 200 . Arlington. Texas 76006 · (817) 649-32161Metro 640-8212/FAX (817) 649-7645
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
e
1. Basic Professional Services by SRA
1.01 SRA shall perform Basic Professional Services for the CITY for the phases of the
Project described in this Agreement. Services include providing professional
consultation and advice and furnishing customary civil, structural, mechanical and
electrical engineering services and customary architectural and landscape
architectural services incidental thereto.
1.02 Schematic Design Phase
a. SRA shall review the program furnished by the CITY to determine the
requirements of the Project and shall arrive at a mutual understanding of
such requirements with the CITY.
b. SRA shall advise the CITY as to the necessity of the CITY's providing or
obtaining from others data or services of the types described in paragraphs
2 and 4, and assist the CITY in obtaining such data and services.
c. SRA shall review with the CITY alternative approaches to design and
construction of the Project.
d.
Based upon the mutually agreed upon program, schedule and project design
budget, SRA shall prepare, for approval by the CITY, Schematic Design
Documents consisting of drawings and other documents illustrating the scale
and relationship of the Project.
e
e. SRA shall submit to the CITY a preliminary opinion of construction cost for
the Project based upon current area, volume, or other unit costs.
1.03 Design Development Phase
a. Based upon the approved Schematic Design Documents and any adjustments
authorized by the CITY in the program, schedule or project design budget, SRA
shall prepare, for approval by the CITY, Design Development Documents
consisting of drawings and other documents to fIX and describe the size and
character of the Project with regard to site, architectural, structural,
mechanical and electrical systems, materials and such other elements as may
be appropriate. Design Development Phase deliverables shall include the
following:
e
(1) Plan views in appropriate scale.
(2) Sections where appropriate.
(3) Elevations where appropriate.
(4) Typical details where appropriate.
(5) Preliminary storm sewer schematic.
(6) Preliminary electrical schematic.
452i
2
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
(7) Outline specification in CSI format.
b. SRA shall coordinate with appropriate governmental authorities for
compliance with applicable codes, ordinances, and laws.
c. SRA shall advise the CITY of any adjustments to the preliminary opinion of
construction cost.
1.04 Construction Documents Phase
a. Based upon the approved Design Development Documents and any further
adjustments in the scope or quality of the Project or in the project design
budget authorized by the CITY, SRA shall prepare, for approval by the CITY,
Construction Documents consisting of Drawings and Specifications setting
forth in detail the requirements for construction of the Project. Construction
Documents Phase deliverables shall include contract documents coordinated
into a bidding package:
(1) Plan sheets illustrating plans, elevations, sections and details of
construction.
(2) Technical specifications.
(3) Project manual containing specifications and bidding documents such as
bid proposal, form of agreement between CITY and Contractor, and
conditions of the contract.
b. SRA shall advise the CITY of any adjustments to previous preliminary opinions
of construction cost indicated by changes in Project requirements or design.
c. SRA shall assist the CITY with the CITY's responsibility for filing documents
required for the approval of governmental or other authorities having
jurisdiction over the Project.
d. In the event that the CITY secures a grant through the Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department to help finance construction of a portion of the Project,
SRA will produce contract documents to meet the TP&WD Plans and
Specifications Guidelines.
1.05 Bidding Phase (project Component Part B. only)
a.
SRA will provide one reproducible copy of the contract documents (plans,
specifications and project manual) for the CITY to use in the production and
distribution of bidding documents.
b.
SRA will respond to Bidders' questions, issue addenda if necessary, and attend
and contribute to a pre-bid conference if one is conducted by the CITY.
4SZi
3
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
e
c. SRA will prepare a bid tabulation sheet for use by the CTIY at the bid
opening.
d. SRA will assist the CTIY in an evaluation of the bids and Bidders.
1.06 Construction Observation Phase (project Component Part B. only)
a. SRA will provide normal and ordinary consultation and administrative services
during this phase of the project. SRA will attend and contribute to a
preconstruction conference if one is conducted by the CTIY.
b. SRA will review shop drawings and submittals as may be required of the
Contractor. SRA will assist the CTIY in the selections of colors and finish
materials appropriate to the work.
c. SRA will issue necessary change orders and directives and review/verify
payment requests submitted to the CTIY by the Contractor.
d.
Site obsetvation visits will be provided by SRA at an average frequency of not
less than two per calendar month nor more than four per calendar month
during periods of construction. A maximum of thirty-five (35) site
obsetvation visits will be provided for the project during the duration of
construction. Additional visits will be provided upon request of the CTIY and
will be compensated for as Additional Setvices.
e
(1) Site obsetvation visits by SRA will be provided to obsetve the progress
of work and to confirm general compliance by the CTIY'S Contractor
with the contract documents. In performing such services, SRA will
endeavor to guard the CTIY against defects and deficiencies in the work
that may be obsetved during the visit(s). However, SRA will not be
required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site visits to inspect the
details, quality and quantity of the construction work. .
e. SRA will provide one "walk through" site obsetvation visit with the CTIY and
Contractor to determine if the project is substantially complete; and SRA will
provide a preliminary punch list.
f. SRA will provide one final obsetvation and one final punch list when the
Contractor and CTIY agree that the project is ready for final obsetvation.
g. Upon receipt of clean, legibly marked drawings from the Contractor, SRA will
produce "Record Drawings" of the constructed facility. The CfIY will receive
one reproducible copy.
e
4S2i
4
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
1.07 Special Conditions for Project Design Components. There will be two general
components of professional services in the Project which shall be separately
identifiable for purposes of the CITY's review and cost accounting.
a. Part A. Elements of this Project Design Component include space allowances
for the following: a high school baseball field, practice fields for
softball/baseball and soccer, recreation trails and pedestrian bridges. Parking
lots, drives, utility services, lighting, irrigation, turf establishment, landscape
development and associated site appurtenances are not included in design
services for this Project Design Component. The following conditions pertain
to this component of Professional Services and modify paragraph 1, Basic
Professional Services by SRA
(1) An aerial topographic survey has previously been produced which will
be used by SRA as the base map of existing conditions.
(2) A boundary survey has not been performed for this site. If boundaries
must be determined, Additional Services of field surveying will be
required. Unless otherwise directed, construction layout by SRA will be
based upon a baseline determined in the field or on the topographic
survey map with the CITY's concurrence.
(3) SRA will provide a construction layout plan (horizontal control) for this
Project Design Component which will consist of providing locations of
playing field corners. Space allowances will be left for future recreation
trails and bridges to be designed in a project apart from this.
(4) Detailed dimensioning of the baseball field will be done by the School
District forces which will be responsible for its design and construction.
External dimensions of the field will be provided to SRA so that the field
can be tied into the horizontal and vertical controls of the site
development.
(5) SRA will provide the grading plan (vertical control) for the entire site in
this Project Design Component.
(6) There will be no construction details by SRA for this Project Design
Component. Backstops and goals for the practice fields will be a
manufactured type ready for installation as selected by the CITY. Details
of construction for the baseball field will be done elsewhere by the
School District.
(7) All construction work for this Project Design Component will be done
by CITY or aftiliated School District forces. No specifications or bidding
documents or cost estimates will be prepared by SRA
452i
5
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
e
5. Compensations
5.01 Compensation for Basic Professional Services for each component part shall be a
stipulated sum proportional to the scope of work or the project design budget. The
stipulated sum shall be increased proportionally if the scope of work or project design
budget is increased.
a. The schedule of compensation follows:
(1) For the Project Design Component Part A of outdoor recreation
facilities on the 33 acre site:
budget
N/A
stipulated sum
$24,500
(2) For the Project Design Component Part B of the tennis center:
budget stipulated sum
$1,925,000
$153,000
b.
The project design budget for Part B will be developed from opinions of
construction cost provided by SRA during the schematic design and design
development phases. Prior to beginning the construction document phase,
the CITY will choose a final project design budget to which the design of the
Project will be coordinated. The stipulated sum is based on a project design
budget range of: $1,825,000 (minimum) to $2,025,000 (maximum).
e
c. Bidding alternates may be provided for Part B so that the CITY will know the
construction costs of other items outside of the base bid, and may have the
option to award a construction contract that includes alternates of the CITY'S
choice.
d. Final payment to SRA for Part B Professional Services shall be based on (1)
the stipulated sum related to the project design budget range described above;
or (2) if higher, the total of the base and all additive alternate bids of the
bidder to whom the contract is awarded by the CITY; or (3) in the event that
bids are received by the CITY but no contract is awarded, on the total of the
base and all additive alternate bids of the single lowest qualified bidder; or
(4) in the event that no bids are taken (or designed alternates are deleted
from the bidding documents), on SRA's latest opinion of construction cost for
Project improvements that were designed for inclusion in the contract
documents. (Note: Items (2), (3) and (4) apply only if the project design
budget is increased above the maximum range as a result of the project scope
being increased.)
e.
Progress payments for Project Design Component Part A shall total the
following percentages:
e
4S2i
9
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
Schematic Design Phase - twenty-five percent
Design Development Phase - twenty-five percent
Construction Documents Phase - forty-five percent
Construction Observation Phase - live percent
Total
(25%)
(25% )
( 45% )
( 5%)
100%
f. Progress payments for Project Design Component Part B shall total the
following percentages:
Schematic Design Phase - fifteen percent (15%)
Design Development Phase - twenty-five percent (25% )
Construction Documents Phase - forty percent (40% )
Bidding Phase - five percent ( 5%)
Construction Observation Phase - fifteen percent (15%)
Total
100%
5.02 Compensations for Additional Professional Services:
(a) For topographic surveying, boundary surveying and production of drawings
of existing conditions (see 4.02), an allowance of $6,500 shall be provided for
compensation.
(b) For securing and coordinating the services of geotechnical engineering (see
4.03), an allowance of $7,500 shall be provided for compensation.
(c) For contingent or optional services that may be needed and authorized by the
CITY, (for such items as platting, zoning, permitting, extra revisions and other
undetermined needs - see 4.04 and 4.05) an allowance of $10,000 shall be
provided for compensation.
(d) For securing the services of a tennis center specialist (see 4.06), an allowance
of $5,000 shall be provided for a maximum of 40 hours of service plus travel,
room and board expenses for two meetings with CITY staff.
(e) For providing a colored rendering of the Project (see 4.07), an allowance of
$4,000 shall be provided for compensation.
5.03 Compensation for other Additional Services that may be authorized shall be a
multiple of direct personnel expense. Direct personnel expense shall be calculated
using the rates and multiplier shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
5.04 Reimbursable Expenses mean the actual expenses incurred by SRA or their
independent professional associates or sub-consultants directly in connection with the
Project. Reimbursements by CITY to SRA shall be based on the following:
452i 10
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
e
a. Certain costs of printing sets of the plans and project manual and related
postage and delivery charges will be reimbursable. Clerical service charges
will be based on the hourly invoice method. Total expenses for these items
are not expected to exceed an allowance of $1,600 for twenty (20) sets of
documents. However, expenses and charges for additional sets of documents
exceeding twenty in number will also be reimbursable.
(1) These expenses will be charged only for construction documents printed
as review sets for the CITY and other agencies or authorities. Printing
charges will not apply to routine reproductions for use by SRA incidental
and normal to in-house design development.
b. Fees required for securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the
CITY and the Project will be reimbursable.
(1) This includes fees required by the Texas Department of Licensing and
Regulation. Expenses for that agency are not expected to exceed an
allowance of $1,200 (for Project Component Part B. only).
c. Out-of-county transportation related to the Project and subsistence incidental
thereto shall be reimbursable.
e
d.
The expenses of producing photographs, mock-ups or models shall be
reimbursable.
e. Other reimbursable expenses may become due if the CITY requests or
authorizes such payment. However, the CITY will not be separately charged
for local transportation, telephone communications, or postage and delivery
charges normal to the project; nor for the use of computer-aided design and
drafting equipment normal to the project.
5.05 Statements of services performed ànd payments due shall be prepared·by SRA and
submitted to the CITY as frequently as once per month. CITY will provide payment
within 30 days of the statement date.
5.06 If the scope of the Project or SRA'S services are materially changed, the amount of
compensation shall be equitably adjusted.
5.ΠRecapitulation of compensations, allowances and estimated reimbursable expenses.
In case of conflict between this paragraph and the preceding paragraphs, the
preceding shall govern.
a.
Basic Services compensations:
(1) For professional services provided
through the construction observation
phase, a stipulated sum of
PART A
PARTB
e
$24,500
$153,000
4S2i
11
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
b. Additional Services allowances and
reimbursables:
(1) Compensation allowances for
additional services that may be
requested or authorized by the City 0 33,000
(2) Allowances for estimated reimbursable
expenses 600 2,200
6. Schedule
6.01 For preparation of contract documents. This schedule is exclusive of additional time
that may be required for the performance of Additional Services and for the City
Staff, Park Board, City Council, State, Federal or other agency review processes and
public meetings. From the time services are authorized to begin, contingent upon
receipt of required information, the schedule follows:
a. For Project Design Component Part A (which shall be completed first and
before the CITY authorizes services to begin on Part B):
(1) Schematic Design Phase: Complete within 15 calendar days of
authorization to proceed.
(2) Design Development Phase: Complete within 15 calendar days of
approval of Schematic Design Documents and authorization to proceed
with Design Development Phase.
(3) Construction Documents Phase: Complete within 30 calendar days of
approval of Design Development Documents and authorization to
proceed with Construction Documents Phase.
b. For Project Design Component Part B:
(1) Schematic Design Phase: Complete within 30 calendar days of
authorization to proceed.
(2) Design Development Phase: Complete within 45 calendar days of
approval of Schematic Design Documents and authorization to proceed
with Design Development Phase.
(3) Construction Documents Phase: Complete within 75 calendar days of
approval of Design Development Documents and authorization to
proceed with Construction Documents Phase.
4S2i
12
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
e
6.02 Should the design phase services to be performed under this Contract not be
completed within twelve (12) calendar months, through no fault of SRA, the terms
of Compensation of this Contract shall be renegotiated for that portion of services
yet to be performed.
7. Termination or Modification of Agreement
This agreement may be terminated by either party or the scope of work may be modified
by the CITY at any time without penalty or liability except as may otherwise be specified
herein, provided SRA will be compensated for the services rendered and reimbursable
expenses due, prior to such termination or modification.
8. Indemnity
SRA agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the CITY whole and harmless against any and all
claims for damages, costs, and expenses of persons or property that may arise out of, or be
occasioned by any negligent act, error or omission of SRA, or any agent, servant, or
employee of SRA in the execution or performance of this Contract, without regard to
whether such persons are under the direction of mY agents or employees.
e
9. Insurance
SRA will maintain workmen's compensation insurance to cover all of its own personnel
engaged in performing services for the mY under this Agreement. SRA also agrees to
maintain public liability insurance covering claims against SRA for damages resulting from
bodily injury, death or property damage from accidents arising in the course of services
performed under this agreement.
10. Special Provisions
10.01 The following consumer information is required by the Landscape Architects
Registration Law, Article 249c, VTCS: The Texas Board of Architectural Examiners
has jurisdiction over individuals licensed under the above named Act. Their address
and telephone number are: 8213 Shoal Creek Blvd., Suite 107; Austin, Texas 78758-
7589; (512) 458-4126.
10.02 For mutual benefit of SRA and the mY, SRA shall not knowingly take any action
called for by the Agreement for Professional Services or arising from the course of
the Project which shall cause loss of SRA'S professional liability insurance coverage
for this Project or any aspect of it.
e
452i
13
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
10.03 This Contract and Agreement is for the exclusive benefits of the CITY and SRA. This
Contract does not exist for the benefit of any third party, nor does it create a
contractual relationship with any third party or parties, including, but not limited to,
Contractors, their subcontractors, and their sureties.
11. Agreement
This agreement is entered into this day of
between the CITY and SRA This agreement is executed in three counterparts.
,1994
CITY
signature
Rodger N. Line
printed name
City Manager
Vice President
title
title
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
SchrickeI, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
4S2i
14
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
e
EMPLOYEE HOURLY SALARY SCHEDULE - 1994
EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION HOURLY COST
Principal $51.03
Senior Associate $41.51
Senior Landscape Architect $36.15
Landscape Architect III $31. 72
Landscape Architect II $25.43
Landscape Architect I $16.00
Senior Engineer $38.05
Engineer III $34.25
Engineer II $29.23
Engineer I $18.06
Senior Planner $38.40
Planner $24.00
Architect $27.61
Designer $27.13
e Systems (Computer) Analyst $18.06
Survey Coordinator/Mapper $22.69
Senior Engineering Technician $22.69
Engineering Technician $20.06
Planning Technician $17.39
Senior DraftsmanlProduction Coordinator $28.71
Draftsman ill $21.10
Draftsman II $15.91
Draftsman I $12.63
Secretaryrvvord Processor $12.63
Clerk $9.51
Computer Graphics (machine time) $8.00
Compensations based on Hourly Charge Rate Method: Applicable employee hourly salary costs
are totaled and multiplied by a factor of 2.50 to obtain the amount invoiced.
*
*
*
*
*
e
FIELD PARTY CHARGES
HOURLY INVOICE RATE
4 Man Survey Party
3 Man Survey Party
2 Man Survey Party
$95.00
$85.00
$70.00
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
D rt t Parks and Recreation Department
epa men:
... . Authonzation to SOlICIt bIds tor Heclford-buless Road
~ubject: Streetscape Masonry Screening Wall
07-11-94
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: PU 94-55
City Council approved a revised budget for the Bedford-Euless Road Streetscape project at the May
23, 1994 meeting (GN 94-60). The revised budget, as approved, included $89,250 for the masonry
screening wall. Council is requested to authorize staff to research and solicit bids for the masonry
screening wall at this time.
Upon approval of a bid for the masonry screening wall, staff will initiate installation of the wall
immediately. Design for the irrigation system, site preparation, turf establishment, hike and bike
trail, and tree plantings should be ready upon completion of the masonry wall installation.
Funding Source:
09-92-20-6000
Bedford-Euless Road Landscaping
$ 89,250
RECOl\1MENDA TION:
-
It is requested that City Council authorize staff to solicit bids for the Bedford-Euless Road masonry
screening wall.
Attachment
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
.. Operating Budget _
. Other _
~k'~~
" epartment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Suffici nt Funds Available
~ ,-
..
. Finance Director
City Manager
Page 1 of
VOV^3N
1
... -~'I.
.~n
. 'II
.·S ¡
. ~. \
~II
·~I! , I
~f !
:.~ j
.~ I
:Ii
'~ I
." I
:~U
I
I·
I'· ':
"
,
i..
,:
I;,
j'"
!", : ~
I
~ .'1 I
., ' í
...
:
,
0 I
ë§1iI
I ~~ \
f3~
I , j~
I w/iI
00 ~
a: ð' I
I ¡(If ,
ßlí l' ,
.10
I. . ..
.,!
~.
I
,
I
i
31dVVI
t
,.
:' :~ ¡
" . ,"
..I'.':
/..1.:
'.
.(. I
11...
~
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I
.
Department: Finance / Public Works
Council Meeting Date:
7/11/94
Subject:
Award Bid for Equipment Lease
Agenda Number:
PU 94-56
Formal bids were solicited for the lease of one loader and one excavator for the Calloway Branch
21" Parallel Sewer Project. This equipment will be leased for approximately three months so the
bidders were requested to submit bids on the monthly lease amount for each piece of equipment.
The results are outlined below.
Loader
Excavator
F ox Rental
$2,700
Case 621-B
$4,200
Case 9030
Mega Equipment
$2,950 $6,000
John Deere 624E John Deere 892-D-LC
The equipment bid by Fox Rental did not meet the minimum specifications and is not the heavy
duty equipment needed to complete this project.
Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for the lease of one loader and
one excavator to be used on the Calloway Branch 21" Parallel Sewer Project, to Mega Equipment
for the monthly lease amounts as listed above.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget X-
Ot r
02-08-01-4750
Fin.".,. DlreC10r
ead Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Finance / Parks and Recreation
Council Meeting Date:
7/11/94
Subject:
Award Bid for ADA Restroom Renovations at the Recreation Agenda Number:
Center and Northfield Park
PU 94-57
To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act renovations are needed at the Recreation
Center and Northfield Park restrooms. Formal bids were solicited for these renovations and the
results are listed below.
Pete Durant and Associates
$43,730
Team Design
$46,500
Penntex Construction
$48,420
Tom Stephens Inc., ofFt. Worth
$50,600
Funding Source:
09-92-07-6000 $24,490
09-92-09-6000 $19,240
Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for the ADA Restroom
Renovations at the Recreation Center and Northfield Park to Pete Durant and Associates in the
amount of $43,730.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number See Above
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
Operating Budget _ ~~. _ \
Other - t\ .~
1J~k^ ~~_. -e~~ CAl&- .' l {~
r è"Y~s,gnature' . Ity ·M:nager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Dir.ctor
Page 1 of
r
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Finance / Parks and Recreation
Council Meeting Date:
7/11/94
Subject:
Award Bid for the Recre::ltion Center Weieht Rnnm Rennv::ltinnsAgenda Number:
PU 94-58
At the recommendation of City Council formal bids were solicited for the expansion of the weight
room at the Recreation Center. The results are listed below.
Pete Durant and Associates
$ 8,714
The Gann Company
$ 8,739
Team Design
$10,110
Penntex Construction
$10,278
Tom Stephens, Inc. of Fort Worth
$20,000
Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for the Recreation Center
Weight Room Renovations to Pete Durant and Associates in the amount of$8,714.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget _
Other - M-
~~~AA hA- '
Department ~Q~ature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number 09-92-09-6000
Suffici nt Funds Available
Finance Director
Page 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Public Works
Contract for Laboratory Services with the
Trinity River Authority
Council Meeting Date:
7/11/94
Subject:
Agenda Number:
PW 94-23
This is a standard contract that we sign each year with the Trinity River Authority for the purpose of
laboratory testing of sewer samples, water samples, etc. This contract is to be effective from October 1,
1994 through September 30, 1995. The proposed fees have increased overall approximately 1 % to 2 %
on the average. The rates are still very reasonable. The funding source for this testing has been included
in the Utility Operating Budget for 1994/95.
Recommenchtion:
The staff recommends the Council approve this contract with the Trinity River Authority for laboratory
testing services for fiscal year 1994/95.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget _
h r
Acct. Number 02-11-02-4927
Sufficient Funds Available
re ~~~
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Director
Page 1 of
·
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
1.
CONTRACTING PARTIES
North Richland
The Receiving Agency: City of Hills , whose authorized address
is 7301 N.E. LOOD 820. P.O. Box 820609. North Richland Hills.
Texas 76182-0609
The Performing Agency: Trinity River Authority of Texas, whose
authorized address is 5300 South Collins, P. O. Box 240, Arlington,
Texas 76010, Attention: Danny F. Vance, General Manager (or his
designated representative).
II. STATEMENT OF SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
In order to discharge the responsibilities associated with the
enforcement of Federal, State, and City regulations, the Receiving
Agency requires services of a laboratory Qualified to perform
water and wastewater analysis, and of personnel to conduct industrial
inspection and/or sampling services, such services detailed in Section
A, Subsection(s) 1,2,& 3 , below.
A. PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES
·
1. Industrial Inspection Services
In keeping with the foregoing, the Receiving Agency employs
the Performing Agency and the Performing Agency agrees to
perform industrial inspection services within the parameters
listed on the attached schedule sheet.
The Performing Agency (Trinity River Authority of Texas) shall
perform all Industrial Pretreatment Inspections, review permit
applications and prepare for submittal Permits to Discharge
Industrial Wastes to the Sanitary Sewer in accordance with
procedures established by the Trinity River Authority of
Texas in accordance with 40 CFR Part 403.8. Industrial
Pretreatment Inspections, Application reviews and Permit
preparations and submittals shall be in compliance with the
Receiving Agency's Industrial Waste Ordinances, Sewer
Ordinances Numbers 1773 & 381 , and EPA General
Pretreatment Regulations for Existing and New Sources.
Records of Inspections, Applications and Permits shall be
maintained as required by EPA General Pretreatment
Regulations, 40 CFR Part 403.12.
2.
Industrial Sampling Services
In keeping with the foregoing, the Receiving Agency employs
the Performing Agency and the Performing Agency agrees to
perform industrial sampling services within the parameters
listed on the attached schedule sheet and in accordance with
the Receiving Agency's Industrial Waste Ordinances and Sewer
Ordinances Numbers 1773 & 381
·
The Performing Agency (Trinity River Authority of Texas) shall
perform all sample collections, sample preservation, and
maintenance of chain-of-custody records in accordance to the
approved procedures set forth in Test Methods for Evaluating
Solid Waste, EPA Manual SW-846, Methods for Chemical Analysis
of Water and Wastes, EPA Manual EPA-600/4-79-020, and the
Handbook for Sampling and Sample Preservation of Water and
Wastewater, EPA Manual EPA-600/4-82-029. The samples shall be
properly collected, preserved and delivered by the Performing
Agency to the Performing Agency's laboratory located at 6500
West Singleton Blvd., Grand Prairie, Texas. When feasible
flow or time composited sampling will be conducted. When
composited sampling is not feasible, grab sampling will be
appropriate.
.
3. Analytical Services
In keeping with the foregoing, the Receiving Agency employs
the Performing Agency and the Performing Agency agrees to
perform analytical services within the parameters listed on
the attached schedule sheet.
.
The Receiving Agency estimates an average of 85 samples per
month will be collected and delivered to the laboratory for
analysis. It is understood that these samples will be
properly collected and preserved in accordance with applicable
sections of A Practical Guide to Water Quality Studies of
Streams, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
publication and Methods for Chemical Analysis for Water and
Wastes, EPA manual, as well as the latest edition of Standard
Methõds for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. A chain-
of-custody procedure shall be maintained in the field and the
laboratory in accordance with procedures to be established by
the Receiving Agency. The Receiving Agency will furnish chain-
of-custody tags.
The Performing Agency (Trinity River Authority of Texas) will
perform all analyses according to the approved procedures set
forth in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, current edition or the latest edition of Methods
for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA manual.
Samples will be analyzed by these methods on the production
basis. to include appropriate analytical quality assurance
procedures. Records will be kept for documentation of the
Performing Agency's quality assurance program and copies will
be available to the Receiving Agency upon request. Unusual
interferences and problems will be reported to the Receiving
Agency at its authorized address noted above. Research
into specific techniques to overcome these difficulties will
be undertaken when practical, and by mutual agreement. The
sample information sheet submitted with each sample will
designate the particulõr analysis or analyses to be made of
each sample submitted. The laboratories will be operated in
such a manner as to insure the legal sufficiency of the sample
handling; analytical and reporting procedures; and to remedy
effects in the procedures should such be discovered.
The various laboratory personnel shall be directed upon
receipt of written notice from the Receiving Agency 72 hours
in advance, to appear and testify in enforcement actions. In
such event, travel and per diem expenses for such employees
shall be paid by the Receiving Agency. Travel and per diem
for court appearances hereunder shall be based on current
State laws.
.
Receiving Agency may deliver to Performing Agency samples for
analysis separate and apart from those samples collected by
the Performing Agency. When the Receiving Agency delivers
samples to the Performing Agency for analysis, the Receiving
Agency shall indicate the nature and extent of the analyses it
desires to be conducted. Performing Agency shall not be
responsible for the manner of collection or chain-of-custody
tags or sheets which are matters entirely outside Performing
Agency's control. Performing Agency shall receive, log and
perform such analyses of samples in accordance with that part
of the chain-of-custody procedures identified as Transfer of
Custody and Shipment attached hereto.
Samples analyzed to maintain the normal quality assurance
program which the Performing Agency presently maintains in its
laboratory will be charged to the Receiving Agency at the same
rate as submitted samples.
·
·
·
B.
TERMINATION
Either party to this Contract may terminate the Contract by giving
the other party thirty (30) days notice in writing at their
authorized address as noted previously. Upon delivery of such
notice by either party to the other and before expiration of the
thirty (30) day period, the Performing Agency will proceed
promptly to cancel all existing orders, contracts, and obligations
which are chargeable to this Contract. As soon as practicable
after notice of termination is given, the Performing Agency will
submit a voucher for work performed under this Contract through
its termination. The Receiving Agency will pay the Performing
Agency for the work performed less all prior payments. Copies of
all completed or partially completed reports. documents, and
studies prepared under this Contract will be delivered by the
Performing Agency to the Receiving Agency when and if this
Contract is terminated prior to the completion of the prescribed
work.
C.
AMENDING THE CONTRACT
The parties hereto without invalidating this Contract may alter or
amend this Contract upon advance written agreement of both parties
to exclude work being performed or to include additional work to
be performed and to adjust the consideration to be paid hereunder
by virtue of alterations or amendments.
III. BASIS FOR CALCULATING REIMBURSABLE COSTS
The financial basis for calculating reimbursable costs shall be as
stated in Attachment A.
The expenditures by the Trinity River Authority of Texas of funds paid
to it under this Contract shall be subject to such State or Federal
audit procedures as may be required by law and by accepted practices
of the State or Federal auditor, or both, if requested. The Trinity
River Authority of Texas shall be responsible for maintaining books of
account that clearly, accurately and currently reflect financial
transactions. The financial records must include all documents
supporting entries on the account records which substantiate costs.
The Trinity River Authority of Texas must keep the records readily
available for examination for a period of three (3) years after the
close of the last expenditure.
Reimbursement for the inspection, sampling, and/or analytical costs,
and cost for any travel and per diem expenses shall not exceed
Fifteen Thousand dollars ($ 15.000.00 ) for the period of this
Contract.
IV. CONTRACT AMOUNT
The total amount of this Contract shall not exceed Fifteen Thousand
dollars {$15.000.0ø nor be less than One Hundred
dollars ($100.00 ).
V. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES
The Performing Agency shall bill the Receiving Agency monthly for
services performed. Charges for these services shall be based on the
attached cost schedules.
The Receiving Agency shall pay the monthly billings of the Performing
Agency within thirty (30) days of their receipt.
VI.
TERM OF CONTRACT
This Contract is to begin October
September 30, 199~.
1-, 19~4and shall terminate
4IIIÞ VII. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Inasmuch as the Receiving Agency and the Performing Agency
are political subdivisions of this state, and inasmuch as
the testing of water and wastewater are critical to the
maintenance of public health and such testing is there-
fore, a governmental function and service, this contract
shall be deemed authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation
Act, art. 4413(32c), Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat.
Receiving Agency:
Performing Agency:
CITY OF North Richland
Hills
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS
BY:
GENERAL MANAGER
DATE:
ATTEST:
BY:
TITLE:
DATE:
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
4IIIÞ
4IIIÞ
·
·
·
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY PROCEDURES
Sample Collection
1. To the maximum extent achievable, as few people as possible should
handle a sample.
2. Stream and effluent samples should be obtained using standard field
sampling techniques and preservation procedures.
3. Chain-of-Custody tags or sheets should be attached to each sample at the
time it is collected.
The tag or sheet contains basically laboratory (requested parameters)
information; however, certain identifying items including City, City
Code, Type Sample, Material Sampled, and Method of Preservation must be
completed by the field personnel collecting the sample.
In completing the Chain-of-Custody tag or sheet, care should be utilized
to insure that all necessary information is correctly and legibly
entered onto the form. A black ballpoint with water proof ink should be
used at all times.
Transfer of Custody and Shipment
1. All samples should be handled by the minimum possible number of persons.
2. All incoming samples shall be received by the custodian, or his
alternate, and logged into a record book (log book). Information to be
entered into the Log Book shall include the sample number, date
received, source, time(s) sampled, date(s) sampled, and analyses
requested.
3. Promptly after logging, the custodian will distribute the sample to an
analyst or place the sample in the sample room, which will be locked at
all times except when samples are removed or replaced by analysts.
4. The custodian shall ensure that heat-sensitive samples, or other sample
materials having unusual physical characteristics, or requiring special
handling, are properly stored and maintained.
5. Samples shall be kept in the sample storage security area at all times
when not actually being used by analysts, such as during overnight
absences.
6. The analysis sheet will be signed and dated by the person performing the
tests and retained as a permanent record in the laboratory.
7. Test results shall be sent by the laboratory to the appropriate
Receiving Agency control point.
·
·
·
ATTACHMENT A
Trinrty River Authority of Texas
Central Regional Wastewater System
TECHNICAL SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
FOR
LABORATORY ABALYSES
INDUSTRIAL INSPECTIONS
AND
INDUSTRIAL SAMPLING
FISCAL YEAR 1994
December 1, 1993 through November 30, 1994
P.O. Box 531196
Grand Prairie. Texas 75053
Metro (214) 263-2251
Fax: (214) 264-1382
Fax: (214) 262-0619
1m
.
.
.
CHEftICAl ANALYSES
WATER
ALKalinity, Total
ALKalinity, Pheolphthalein
Bicarbonate
Carbonate
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BODS)
Biochemical Oxygen Deaand (C-BOD5)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (C-BOD20)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD20)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD-7)
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Chloride
Chromium Hexavalent
Conductance, Specific
Conductance, Diluted
Cyanide
Cyanide (Amendable to Chlorination)
Fluoride, Dissolved
Fluoride, Total
Hardness
19nitabi l ity
(PensKy-"artens Closed Cup)
Nitrogen:
AlIIIIIOf'Iia
Kjeldahl, Total
Nitrate
Nitrite
Organic
Oil and Grease
ICP/M METAL ANALYSES
59.DO EACH
Antimony
Barium
Beryllium
CadmiulI
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Thall ium
Tin
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Iron
Lead
"anganese
I10lybdenulI
NicKel
Silver
Tellurium
$1. DO EACH
Aluminum
Boron
Calcium
"agnesiulI
Potassium
Silica
Sodi um
$14.DO EACH
Arsenic
SeleniulI
Lead - Low Level
Copper - Low Level
Cadmium - Low Level
Chromium Hexavalent - Low Level
Thallium - Low Level
$12.10 EACH
Mercury
S 5.25
S 5.25
S 5.25
S 5.25
S 110.00
$ 110.50
S 110.85
S 110.85
S 110.65
$ 8.00
S 5.25
S 11.00
S 10.00
S 7.00
S 28.50
S 33.00
S 9.50
S 9.00
$ 7.00
S 32.00
S 6.20
S 15.00
S 6.20
S 6.20
S 32.00
S 27.25
pH
pH Sediment
Phenols:
High Level
Low Level
Phosphorus:
Ortho
Total
Sol ids:
Total (TS)
Total Dissolved(TDS)
Total Suspended(TSS)
Volatile Suspended (VSS) After TSS
Sulfate
Sulfide
Surfactants - "BAS
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Total Organic Carbon
Turbidity
SEDIMENT
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Cyanide
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
Oil and Grease
Phosphorus, Total
Solids, Total Volatile
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
PRIORITY POlLUTMT METALS
$ 130.10 TOTAL
Antimony
Arsenic
Bery II i UII
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
"ercury
NicKel
Selenium
Silver
Thall ium
Zinc
SAlU'LE PREPARATION
Sediment and Oils
EP Toxicity Leachate
TCLP Toxicity Leachate
TYC Leachate
S 15.00
S 67.00
S 80.00
S 36.00
S 3.50
S 6.00
S 33.00
S 53.00
S 6.20
S 9.50
S 5.00
S 8.75
S 7.70
S 10.15
S 13.00
S 5.25
S 28.35
S t.8.00
S 11.75
S 3.50
S 23.75
S 31.50
S 18.00
S 24.75
S 11.50
S 9.00
S 102.00
GAS CHROMTOGRAPHY ANALYSES
.RIORITY POLLUTANTS (GC/"S)
Volatiles Quoted Upon
Base Neutrals Request-
Acid Extractables
Pesticides/PCB's
PESTICIDES/PCB'S
ORGANIC DETERPlINATION (GC)
Hydrocarbon/Solvents
General Hydrocarbon/Solvent $105.00
Scan (VOA) (One column)¡
*Five or less components¡
including quantification
General Hydrocarbon\Solvent $160.00
Scan (VOA) (Two column)¡
*Five or less components¡
including quantification
Volatile Organic Constituents $ 59.00
(EPA regulated - method 601/602)
*ADD fifteen dollars ($15)
for each extra component
scanned and quantified
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, $100.00
Organophosphate Pesticides, and
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Sample
preparation, extraction, and
cLean-up per sampLe)
ADD for ChLorinated Hydrocarbon $ 47.00
(Confirmation and quantification
per sample)
ADD for Organosphosphate Pesticide $ 50.00
(Confirmation and quantification
per sampLe)
ADD for PoLychLorinated BiphenyLs $ 50.00
(PCB) - Water (Confirmation and
quantification per sampLe)
ADD for PCB - Oil (Confirmation and $ 35.00
quantification per sample)
TRIHALOfIETHAHES
Trihalomethanes $ 40.00
HERBICIDES
SAMPLE PREPARATION
Chlorinated Phenoxy Acid
Herbicides (Confirmed and
quantified)
$115.00
ADD for Special Treatment/Per $ 18.50
SampLe (Sedi.ent, Oil)
ADD for SpeciaL Treatment/Per SampLe $ 67.00
(EP Toxicity Leachate)
ADD for SpeciaL Treatment/Per SampLe $ 80.00
(TCLP Toxicity Leachate)
. SPECIAL ANALYSES
. TCLP/EP TOXICITY
PRIORITY POlLUTANTS
Leachate Extraction Procedure $ 80.00
Metals: Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium
Chromium, Lead, Mercury, SeLenium
Silver $ 85.70
organics: Endrin¡ Lindane;
Methoxychlor¡ Toxaphene¡ 2, 4, D¡
2, 4, 5-TP SiLvex $262.00
Cyanides
Metals
Organics
$ 28.50
$130.70
Quote
MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSES
Chlorophyll "a"
Chlorophyll "a" and Pheophytin "a"
Coliform, Fecal (MF)
Coliform, TotaL (MF)
Colifor.s, TotaL (MMO/MUG)
Microscopic GeneraL Examination
Microtox, Bacterial Bioassay
Streptococcus, FecaL (MF)
Heterotrophic Plate Count
$ 7.70
$ 7.70
$ 8.35
$ 8.00
$ 7.85
$ 9.00
$ 43.50
$ 8.35
$ 8.20
.
.
INDUSTRIAL PRETREA~ENT SERVICES
INDUSTRIAL SAI'IPLlNG
INDUSTRiAL INSPECTION
Composite Sample
Additional Composite Sample
Grab Sample
Addi~ional Grab Sample
S 65.00
S 20.00
$ 32.00
S 8.00
Inspection/On Site
S 70.00
- Installation of Automatic
- Grab Sampling
- Delivery to TRA Laboratory
- Field Testing Available
- Sample Preservation
- Proper Chain of Custody
co.posite Samplers
- Permit Application Review
- Verification of Application Data
- Consultation with Industries on
Pretreatment
- Chemical Inventory Review
Indus~rial
GENERAL SERVICE INFORKATION
1. Effective Date: December 1, 1993, all prices listed are per sample and subject to review.
2. All analyses are run in accordance with "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,"
17th Edition, 1989 and/or EPA "Manual of Methods for Chemical Analysis of lIater and lIastes," 1983 and
the 3rd Edition of Solid lIaste Manual SII 846.
3. TRA will add a 107. charge, at the same rate as submitted laboratory samples, on the monthly billing to
maintain the normal quality assurance program.
4. Customer required priority laboratory samples completed and reported within 50% of the normal ti~ will be
billed at one and one-half times the routine rate. Emergency samples run immediately or ASAP will be billed
at two times the routine rate.
.
5. Sa~le preparations, if required, are charged additionally as listed.
6. Sa~le containers, preservatives, and supplies will be provided upon request at a reasonable charge. Bacte-
riological sampling supplies are included in the cost of the analyses.
7. Samples* should be delivered to the laboratory before 4:30 p... on weekdays. Sa~les cannot be accepted on
weekends or holidays unless special arrangements are made in advance.
*<Bacteriological sa.ples should be delivered prior to 2:00 p... unless special arrangements are .ade in advance.
After-hour samples may be left in cold storage vault with analyses request for..)
8. Billing stat~ents for co.pleted monthly analyses are mailed by the 15th of the following month.
9. Laboratory hours are weekdays 7:00 a... to 10:00 p.m. and weekends 8:00 a.M. to 4:00 p.M.
10. Environmental Field, Engineering Field and Pretreatment Services office hours are ~y through Friday, 8:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m. For after-hour emergencies, leave message with computer operator.
11. EnvironMental Field and Engineering Field Services are requested to be scheduled a MinilUm of 72 hours in advance.
FOR !tORE INFORftATlClt, CONTACT:
METRO: (214) 263-2251
FAX: (214) 262-0619
Patricia M. Cleveland
Manager, Technical Services
Bi II Cyrus
Laboratory Division Chief
Randy McIntyre, P.E.
Pretreatment Coordinator
Robert J. Roth
Technical Services Engineer
, Qual ity
Assurance Coordinator
.
.
.
-.
ATTACHMENT A
Trinity River Authority of Texas
Central Regional Wastewater System
TECHNICAL SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
FOR
LABORATORY ANALYSES
INDUSTRIAL INSPECTIONS
AND
INDUSTRIAL SAMPLING
FISCAL YEAR 1995
December 1, 1994 through November 30, 1995
P.O. Box 531196
Grand Prairie, Texas 75053
Metro (214) 263-2251
Fax: (214) 264-1382
Fax: (214) 262-0619
* RecyclsdPaper
CHEMICAL ANALYSES
. YATER
.
.
Acidity $ 5.15
Alkalinity, Total $ 5.40
Alkalinity, Pheolphthalein $ 5.40
Bicarbonate $ 5.25
Carbonate $ 5.25
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) $ 14.50
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (C-BOD5) $ 15.00
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (C-BOD20) $ 15.25
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD20) $ 14.85
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD-7) $ 14.75
Chemical Oxygen Demand $ 8.00
Chloride $ 5.40
Chromiun Hexavalent $ 11.00
Conductance, Specific $ 4.25
Conductance, Diluted $ 7.25
Cyanide $ 28.50
Cyanide (Amendable to Chlorination) $ 33.00
Fluoride, Dissolved $ 9.50
Fluoride, Total $ 9.00
Glycols $ 7.05
Hardness $ 7.25
Ignitability
(Pensky-Martens Closed Cup)
Nitrogen:
Anmonia
Kjeldahl, Total
Nitrate
Nitrite
Organic
Oil and Grease
pH
pH Sediment
Phenols:
High Level
Low Level
Phosphorus:
Ortho
Total
Sol ids:
Total (TS)
Total Dissolved(TDS)
Total Suspended(TSS)
Volatile Suspended (VSS) After TSS
Sulfate
Sulfide
Surfactants - MBAS
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Total Organic Carbon
Turbidity
$ 32.25
SEDIMENT
$ 6.20
$ 15.00
$ 6.20
$ 6.20
$ 32.00
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Cyanide
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total
Oil and Grease
Phosphorus, Total
Solids, Total Volatile
Total Petroleun Hydrocarbons
$ 42.00
ICP/AA METAL ANALYSES
$9.00 EACH
PRIORITY POlLUTANT METALS
5 130.70 TOTAL
Antimony
Bariun
Berylliun
Caåniun
Chromiun
Cobalt
Copper
Thall iun
Tin
Uraniun
Vanadiun
Zinc
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryll iun
Caåniun
Chromiun
Copper
Lead
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenun
Nickel
Silver
Telluriun
57.00 EACH
SAMPLE PREPARATION
Aluninun
Boron
Calciun
Magnesiun
Potassiun
Sil i ca
Sodiun
Sediment and Oi ls
EP Toxicity Leachate
TCLP Toxicity Leachate
TWC Leachate
$14.00 EACH
Arsenic
Seleniun
Lead - Low Level
Copper - Low Level
Caåniun - Low Level
Chromiun Hexavalent - Low Level
Thalliun - Low Level
$12.70 EACH
Mercury
Mercury
Nickel
Seleniun
Silver
Thall iun
Zinc
$ 15.00
$ 67.00
$ 85.00
$ 36.00
$ 27.25
$ 3.65
$ 6.25
$ 33.00
$ 52.00
$ 6.20
$ 9.75
$ 5.25
$ 9.00
$ 7.70
$ 4.30
$ 13.50
$ 5.50
$ 28.35
$ 48.00
$ 11.75
$ 3.75
$ 23.75
5 31.50
$ 18.00
S 24.75
S 11.90
S 9.10
. GAS CHR<MATOGRAPHY AHAL YSES
PRIORITY POLLUTANTS (GC/MS)
Volatiles
Base Neutrals
Acid Extractables
Pesticides/PCB's
Quoted Upon
Request
ORGANIC DETERMINATION (GC)
Hvdrocarbon/Solvents
General Hydrocarbon/Solvent
Scan (VOA) (One column);
*Five or less components;
including quantification
General Hydrocarbon\Solvent
Scan (VOA) (Two column);
*Five or less components;
including quantification
Volatile Organic Constituents
(EPA regulated - method 601/602)
*ADD fifteen dollars ($15)
for each extra component
scanned and quantified
HERBICIDES
Chlorinated Phenoxy Acid
Herbicides (Confirmed and
quant if i ed)
. SPECIAL AHAL YSES
TCLP/EP TOXICITY
PESTICIDES/PCB'S
$105.00
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons,
Organophosphate Pesticides, and
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Sample
preparation, extraction, and
clean-up per sample)
ADD for Chlorinated Hydrocarbon
(Confirmation and quantification
per sample)
ADD for Organosphosphate Pesticide
(Confirmation and quantification
per sample)
ADD for Polychlorinated Biphenyls
(PCB) - Water (Confirmation and
quantification per sample)
ADD for PCB - Oil (Confirmation and
quantification per sample)
$160.00
$ 59.00
TR IHAUJETHANES
Trihalomethanes
SAMPLE PREPARATION
$115.00
$100.00
$ 47.00
$ 50.00
$ 50.00
$ 35.00
$ 40.00
ADD for Special Treatment/Per $ 18.50
Sample (Sediment, Oil)
ADD for Special Treatment/Per Sample $ 67.00
(EP Toxicity Leachate)
ADD for Special Treatment/Per Sample $ 85.00
(TCLP Toxicity Leachate)
PRIORITY POlLUTANTS
Leachate Extraction Procedure $ 85.00
Metals: Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium
Chromium, Lead, Mercury, Selenium
Silver $ 85.70
Organics: Endrin; Lindane;
Methoxychlor; Toxaphene; 2, 4, D;
2, 4, 5-TP Silvex $262.00
M I CROB I OLOGI CAL AHAL YSES
Cyanides
Metals
Organics
$ 28.50
$130.70
Quote
Ch lorophyll "a"
Chlorophyll "a" and Pheophytin "a"
Coliform, Fecal (MF)
Coliform, Total (MF)
Coli forms, Total (MMO/MUG)
Microscopic General Examination
Microtox, Bacterial Bioassay
Streptococcus, Fecal (MF)
Heterotrophic Plate Count
.
S 7.70
S 7.70
S 8.50
S 8.10
S 7.85
$ 9.35
$ 43.50
$ 8.50
$ 8.40
.
.
.
INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT SERVICES
INDUSTRIAL SAMPLING
INDUSTRIAL INSPECTION
Composite Sample
Additional Composite Sample
Grab Sample
Additional Grab Sample
$ 75 .00
$ 25.00
$ 35.00
$ 10.00
$ 70.00
Inspection/On Site
- Installation of Automatic Composite Samplers
- Grab Sampling
- Delivery to TRA Laboratory
- Field Testing Available
- Sample Preservation
- Proper Chain of Custody
- Pennit Application Review
- Verification of Application Data
- Consultation with Industries on Industrial
Pretreatment
- Chemical Inventory Review
GENERAL SERVICE INFORMATION
1. Effective Date: December 1, 1994, all prices listed are per sample and subject to review.
2. All analyses are run in accordance with "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,"
18th Edition, 1992 and/or EPA "Manual of Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes," 1983 and
the 3rd Edition of Solid Waste Manual SW 846.
3. TRA will add a 10X charge, at the same rate as submitted laboratory samples, on the monthly billing to
maintain the normal quality assurance program.
4. Customer required priority laboratory samples completed and reported within SOX of the normal time will be
billed at one and one-half times the routine rate. Emergency samples run immediately or ASAP will be billed
at two times the routine rate.
5. Sample preparations, if required, are charged additionally as listed.
6. Sample containers, preservatives, and supplies will be provided upon request at a reasonable charge. Bacte-
riological sampling supplies are included in the cost of the analyses.
7. Samples* should be delivered to the laboratory before 4:30 p.m. on weekdays. Samples camot be accepted on
weekends or holidays unless special arrangements are made in advance.
*(Bacteriological samples should be delivered prior to 2:00 p.m. unless special arrangements are made in advance.
After-hour samples may be left in cold storage vault with analyses request fonn.)
8. Billing statements for completed monthly analyses are mailed by the 15th of the following month.
9. Laboratory hours are weekdays 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and weekends 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
10. Environmental Field, Engineering Field and Pretreatment Services office hours are Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m. For after-hour emergencies, leave message with computer operator.
11. Environmental Field and Engineering Field Services are requested to be scheduled a minimum of 72 hours in advance.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CDlTACT:
METRO: (214) 263-2251
FAX: (214) 262-0619
Patricia M. Cleveland
Manager, Technical Services
Bill Cyrus
Laboratory Division Chief
Randy Mcintyre, P.E.
Environmental Services
Coordinator
Robert J. Roth
Technical Services Engineer
Kimberly Brown, Quality
Assurance Coordinator
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Public Works
Ratify Contract with D.B. Utilities in the
Amollnt of $4.'\4.0000 for r~111ow~y Rr~n('h
21- Inch Parallel Sewer
Council Meeting Date:
7/11/94
Subject:
Agenda Number:
PW 94-24
Staff brought this issue to Council in IR 94-93 on June 27, 1994 (see attached). The contract amount of
$43,400.00 provides for all the trenching on this project to be done by D.B. Utilities.
Fllndine SOllrc.e:
Sufficient funds were appropriated from Utility CIP for this project with the approval of the Construction
Division's 1993/94 Operating Budget.
Recommend~tion:
It is recommended Council ratify the contract with D.B. Utilities in the amount of $43,400.00.
Finance Review
Acct. Number 02-08-01-6500
Suffi ¡ent Funds Available
rtment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Director
Page 1 of
.
.
.
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
IR 94-93
No.
~".
:' /.
J; \
~.- '-.
Date: June 27, 1994
Subject: Sewer Line Construction from Highway 26 to Booth Calloway
Road
Previous action by the Council ratified the purchase of pipe and the
rental of equipment to parallel an existing sewer line. This
construction goes from the north entrance of the mall at Highway 26
across the mall parking lot and Calloway Branch and extends to Booth
Calloway Road. This job is being done by our own construction crew
under the direction of David Smyth. We anticipated approximately 45
days to complete this proj ect . However, this past week we have
encountered almost solid rock. Progress is very slow and could take as
long as three months. Under the emergency powers granted to the City
Manager we have rented a rock trenching machine at a cost of $10,000.
This rental will give us the machine long enough to trench across the
north entrance of the mall. Approximately $43,000 will rent this
machine to complete the entire job. We will discuss this situation on
Monday night.
Respectfully submitted,
/1 li:L
Deputy City Manager
CAS:ph
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
.
.
.
DB UTILITIES
CUSTOM TRENCHING
1706 Dakota
Garland. TX 75043
(214) 840-8784
Fax (214) 864-0721
City of NORTH RICHLAND HILL8
P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills. TX 76182-0609
.Jurle 21. 1994
'21 II
re: Bid proposal for trenching ~ 8.8. for the ci ty of N.
Richland Hills at 8.E. corner of 820 and Hwy 26.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Trenching for total Project (approx. 2700 ft) excluding where
piping is already installed and areas where trencher
accessi bi 1 i ty i·,. not feasi bl e.
TOTAL BID ........$ 43,400.00
Ir~
Don Bartosh
President
Accepted:
f?tl~
ú4 jt1~
Title:
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Public Works
Approve Change Order No.1 for
1994 Miscellanf'nm: Strf'p.t Suh~r::ln~ ::Inn
Surface Reconstruction
Council Meeting Date:
7/11/94
Subject:
Agenda Number:
PW 94-25
The change order is for sub grade stabilization on Bellhurst Court prior to staff placing a 4-inch asphalt
surface overlay. The contractor, JRJ Paving, already has a contract for $31,432 which includes Lynda
Lane, Mickey Street, Hewitt Street and College Circle. All of these streets will be left in a final graded
fashion, ready for the Public Works staff to follow behind the contractor and place a hot mix asphaltic
concrete overlay. Bellhurst Court would be the only street on the list with existing curb and gutter and
would require a deeper excavation.
The cost for Change Order No. 1 is $6,893.70 with no increase in bid time. With approval of the
Change Order, the new contract price for the subject project will be $38,325.70.
Funning SOllrce:
Sufficient funds are available in the Public Works Operating Budget (01-60-04-3080).
R~comm~nn::ltion :
It is recommended Council approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $6,893.70.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Suffi ient Funds Available
Finance Director
Page 1 of
4R
1
SR //
i ./
; / 9R
-1 //
7R
lc;R)\ /'
-/~-
// l4A ~ 8A
/'1..,,//
/ \ 9A
13R \ /~
...;r
____//' 10A
l2R ''\---
. 11R
'~
-r--, /
13R / './ lOR
l2R \///
llFi
l4R
/
./'/ ---
15R
01Þ.~ON~.
_ Q}t<S_. 2
~.~-
--~--_. ~
o
...J
...J
1~ H
~
WENDELL CT S
2A 5
2
2:..
_._-
,---
6BW..,\¡;¡gS ~
c ~ 5 --:ll
3
! ------ --!~"2-~~~·
E: F.--Ì ~
, 32 .7 S
"
"
1.
cØ
7R
e
33 N
.:j'j4C
TR 1
38.773 AC
PROPOS
-6pì.e'J~~\{- -
----- .
TR 3
. ':33 A(.
;121:::' 4
~r--~
3 I 2 ¡ 1
~
:CJ)õ
'W
z(f1
~o
~;!
o
J
TR 4
: 4C
2 5 f: ; 8
WALKER ST.
I
:~w¡::T NE TR 7
:PT .62 AS
r¡; 76
.333 4:
__ 1-0- _c
_ _ _ ..r--.
.:'7"....:"":=.""'="..-:0+
- -:-:-:=:-::---~~=-~-=--.;.-
---='---'=:::"'==~-~
3i1¡..;T '3E
,PT
TR 7:..
;2 . :,. d ~ A;':
f'zœec.:r
L- 0 c.A.,.., Þ t.)
TR :SA
22.118 AC
HALl"Ot-\ crT\{ L"
-,-(1'¡\ H 1 ~ H
LJp..:-- \ u;rr\OOL-
r' ::JV
JUL- 6-94 WED 14:20 NRH PUBLIC WORKS UTILITY 8176567552
P.01
JUL-05-84 12.22 FROM. JRJ PAVING INC
ID. 211,\6666767
PAGE:
e
CHANGE OROER NO. .....L TO THE CONTRACT WHICH WAS DATED MAY 24, 1994
Between __
THE CfTY OF NORT H RlCHLAND HilLS
. fOWN ERt
And
JRJ fA VING
, fCONTRACTORI
For 1994 MISCELLANEOUS STREET SUSGAADE AND SURFACE AECØNST6UCTION
Pura~nt to thø provision. of Section 49 of the General Conditions 01 Agreement of the
Cantrlct, this Change Order, when fullV e)(8cuted, shall conltitute the authority to change
the work of the project II follows:
Add the fOllowIng Itreet to the project:
1 . Bellhurlt Court
Add the following quantltie. to existing bid iteme:
Bid + Bid
llitm De.~rlÐt'ðn .!- UnIt &itA QullntJ: Extension
e 1. Unclassified .treet + C.Y. . 8.65 218 ., ,886.70
excavation 4-6" deep to
Includë haul off
2. Subgrade stabi1izøtion + s.y, 2.60 1.308 3.266.00
lime treated 8- thIck.
3. Hydrated lime 32lba. per + Ton. 83.00 2' 1,743.00
S.Y.
TOTAL COST OF THIS CHANGE ORDER .8,893.70
The Contracll, modified al fonow.:
Oriolnal Contract . 31,432.00
ThIs Change Ord... No.1 . 8.893.'70
Total Contract Amount Including ChAnge Order '38.325.70
8v: Date: 1- C; ~C1I.-I
By: Date; 7--to--1¥
e
BV:_ _. Cate: - -----..........---..-......--
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Fin;:lnr.A/P, Jhlir. WnrkR _ Council Meeting Date: 5/23/94
SUbject: Award Bid for 1994 Miscellaneous Street Subgrade and Agenda Number: PU 94-40
Surface Reconstruction
Formal bids were solicited for Miscellaneous 1994 Street Subgrade and Surface Reconstruction.
This project will involve street excavation, subgrade stabilization and the application of hydrated
lime on Lynda Lane, Mickey Street, Hewitt Street and College Circle. The results are outlined
below.
Reynolds Asphalt $49,305
Sutton & Associates $39,376
APAC $38,715
JRJ Paving $31,432
Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for Miscellaneous Street
Subgrade and Reconstruction to JRJ Paving in the amount of $31,432.
DATE;
TcKÝ.
/
COUNCIL ACTION:
COMMENTS·
-'
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available .
l~~í~if;çr~
gnatu e City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
01.00-0<1.-'3080
. FInance DlttIClOr
Page 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
e,ubject:
Parks and Recreation Department
Final Payment to Clifford Fogus Company
for Adventure World Playground Construction
~ Council Meeting Date: 07-11-9:t-
Agenda Number: PAY 94-14
The construction of the Adventure World Playground is complete. The City Council awarded
the contract to Clifford Fogus Company in the amount of $353,755. One change order has
been executed in the amount of $12,855 for the fitness course area, bringing the revised
contract amount to $366,610.
Additionally, City Council authorized staff to proceed with turf establishment and
landscaping prior to the dedication ceremony, and completion of spreading the wood chip
surfacing, gravel, and fabric for change order number two, in the amount of $43,506. This
brings the final revised contract amount to $ 410,116.
Staff recommends approval of final payment in the amount of $80,167.
Original Contract Amount
Change Order #1
Change Order #2
Revised Contract Amount
tit Less Previous Payments
Final Payment Amount
FUNDING SOURCE:
$353,755
$ 12,855
$ 43.506
$410,116
($329.949)
$80,167
Funds are available from the 1993/94 Parks and Recreation Capital Improvement Program
City Park Development account, 09-92-25-6000, and from unspecified fund baìances.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff Recommends approval of final. payment to Clifford Fogus Company in the amount of
$80,167 for the Adventure World Playground construction.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
_Other .. _
~~Q~
Department Head Signature
-
Finance Review
. Finance Director
City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Public Works Council Meeting Date:
Approve Final Pay Estimate No.1 in the Amount of
~7Q) 111 '\1 to All-Tpy P~vine, Tn~ fOT 1 QQ4. ('hip ~P5l1 Agenda Number:
Program
7/11/94
Subject:
PAY 94-15
This street maintenance project was awarded by Council on Apri111, 1994, PW 94-10. The total
contract price including change orders is $79,496.65. Total payment of this first and final pay estimate to
the contractor will be $79,133.53.
The contractor substantially completed this project on June 22, 1994. The project is now totally
complete with all final adjustments having been made.
Fnncline SOllfce:
Sufficient funds were budgeted by Council on 12/13/93 in PW 93-43.
Rp.commp.ncl~tion :
The staff recommends Council approve final payment to All-Tex Paving, Inc. in the amount of
$79,133.53.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number 13-23-10-6000
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
Operating Budget _ 1\... ~~
o ment~e~ at ~ u IL i;g:er
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Director
Page 1 of
CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE
PAGE 1 OF 1
.
Estimate No.:
RleNo:
Project Description:
1 & Final Job No.:
3 - 248
Date:
Gal Days:
W.O. Date:
Scheduled Completion Date:
For Materials Fumished and Labor
Performed in Period Ending:
Time Charged Thru Period (Days):
06/20/94
45
09-May-94
23-Jun-94
NRH248.WI<3
1994 CHIP SEAL PROGRAM
Contractor:
Owner:
Place:
ALL- TEX PAVING, INC.
CI1Y OF NORTH RICH lAND HILLS
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS
NO.
ITEM DESCRIPTiON
PREVIOUS THIS UNIT
UNIT ESTiMATE ESTiMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT
S.Y. 0.00 81,302 81,302 $0.89 72,358.78
TON 0.00 .75 .75 9,033.00 6,774.75
1 . *Single Course Chip Seal Coat
2 .*Asphalt Base Crack Sealing Material
Denotes C.O. # 1 has been added
TOTAL AMOUNT :
$79,133.53
Field Verification of Job Conditions
and Confirmation of Pay Quantities
Submitted:
ALL- TEX PAVING, INC.
Ron J. Davis
Date: June 20. 1994
.
Total. . . . . . . . . .
Less Percent (%) Retained.
Difference. . . . . . .
Plus (%) Materials on Hand .
Total. . . . . . . . . .
Less Previous Payments. . .
Difference Due this Estimate .
(Note: Pay Last Amount Shown)
79 ,133.53
10%
79,133.53
100%
79.133.53
0.00
$79,133.53
Total Eamings (Incl. Retain.):
Time Charged Thru This Period:
Bid:
Time:
$79,496.65
45
Percent:
Percent:
.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Public Works Council Meeting Date: 7/11/94
Approve Final Pay Estimate No.4 in the Amount of
$145,780 17 to APAC-Texas for 199:\ Chip Seal Agenda Number: PAY 94-16
Program
Subject:
This street maintenance project was awarded by Council on July 12, 1993, PW 93-33. The total contract
price is $385,230.24. Final payment to the contractor will make his total earnings on the project
$372,187.79. This is $13,042.45 under the contract amount. The savings is from the contractor not
having as many sprinkler system adjustments and street sawcuts as projected.
The contractor substantially completed this project on June 22, 1994. The project is now totally complete
with all final adjustments having been made.
Fnndine Sonrce:
Sufficient funds were budgeted by Council on 5/24/93 in PW 93-19.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends Council approve final payment to AP AC- Texas, Inc. in the amount of
$145,780.17.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
h r
Acct. Number 13-23-08-6000
Sufficient Funds Available
Finance Director
nt Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
JOB 3-248 DATE:
CAL DAYS,
W.O, DATE.
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATEI
FOR MATERIALS FURNISHED AND LABOR
i PERfORMED IN PERIOD ENDING.
I TIME CHARGED THRU PERIOD (DAYS).
~RfYtOUS THIS UNIT
UNIT ¡ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE
.;---
'QÐ.I t H
JUL 05 '94
10: 09AM APAC- TEXAS, INC E S T I l. i I" E
~ v " , n ~ ~ I V n ~ ~ ~ I
,
. . , I . I II
!
I . . , I . . . , I .
ESIATE NO, 4
F O.
PR CT DESCRI'TJON. CHIP SEAL PR06RAM, 1983
CONTRACTOR I APAC-TEXAS. INC.
OINER, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PLACE, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
NO, ITEI DESCRIPTION
.. .
"I.... II.......
... .
t..,. t.,
..,..... .
1, SINBLE COURSE CHIP SEAL
2. REPLACE '"11" CURB & GUTTER
3, REPLACE 8'114' CURB' GUTTER
4. PAYEMENT REPAIR
5, SAW CUT ASPHALT
e. MISC. PLUMBING ALLOWANCE
S. Yo
L . F .
L. F .
S. V.
L. F .
L, S.
16,164,00
3,018.50
10.00
3,581.45
H,ze1.00
0.0077
73,15&.00"
0,00
0.00
0.00
0,00
(O.OOOO)
HGE 1 fro ~
,.,.., "
80,121.00
3,018,50
10.00
3,881.45
U,U1.00
0.0077
$1.81/
*31.15
tl1.iO
&H.20
$0,15
"0,000.00
I
I
I
I
I
.......,..............,.... .., ....,. .......,..,.,.."....... ... .1.,..,....,...... .... ......,...
FIELD VERIFICATION OF JOB CONDITIONS SUBMITTED BY,
AND CONFIRMATION OF PAY QUANTITIES APAC-TEXAS, INC,
. COHr~R
BY, II, ~&
¡PROJECT' AU )
DATE,
.11:17 '
...,. I..'...,.....,...... "" "" ,........1.
JULY',
,.... I.............. II.....
DATE I
Total
Less 5 % Retained
Difference
Plus 95% of Materials on Hand
Total
Less Previous Payments
Difference Due iliis Estimate
TOTAL EAANIMQS (INCL. RETAIN.I.
Tile CHARtED THRU THIS PERIOD,
aaUT.a liD,
331 TilE.
t . . , . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " I . . . . . . I . . . , . , . . , . . t . . . . . . . I , . . . I . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , I . .
388210 PERCENT,
300 PERCENT.
.
JULY 6, 1814
3
02-AUG-93
U-Uy-U
08130114
noun
""",", .
'145,020.
85,713,
3U.
12 1, SO 1.
','85.
71.
U
,11_
,
$372, 187.7Ç
O;()(
372, 187.7Ç
o.()(
372, 187.7Ç
226,407.6:
$ 145,780. lí
as,
110.
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO. 1993
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING
ORDINANCE # 1781, THE ELECTRICAL ORDINANCE, REGARDING
ELECTRICAL LICENSE EXAMINATION PROCEDURES; TO DELETE ALL
REFERENCE TO THE TARRANT COUNTY ELECTRICAL EXAMINING
BOARD; BY PROVIDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY AUTHORIZE
THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS APPOINTED DESIGNEE TO CONTRACT
WITH AN EXAMINING AGENCY TO PERFORM EXAMINATION SERVICES
AS THE CITY'S OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED EXAMINING AGENCY; BY
PROVIDING THAT IN THE AL TERNA TIVE, THE CITY COUNCIL MAY
AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS APPOINTED DESIGNEE TO
CONTRACT WITH OTHER CITIES IN THE NORTH TEXAS REGION TO
RETAIN THE SERVICES OF AN EXAMINING AGENCY TO PERFORM
EXAMINA TIONS AS THE CITY'S OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED EXAMINING
AGENCY; BY PROVIDING THAT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE
AUTHORIZED TO APPROVE OTHER EXAMINING AGENCIES WHOSE
CERTIFICA TIONS OF EXAMINATION SHALL BE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY
IN LIEU OF THE CERTIFICATE OF EXAMINATION ISSUED BY THE CITY'S
OFFICIALL Y DESIGNATED EXAMINING AGENCY, SUCH AGENCIES TO
BE DESIGNATED AS ALTERNATE EXAMINING AGENCIES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SA VINGS CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills adopted a new electrical ordinance number
1781 on February 10, 1992, and
WHEREAS, the electrical ordinance contained provisions for electrical license
examinations, and
WHEREAS, the electrical ordinance recognized the Tarrant County Electrical Examining
Board as the official examining agency, and
WHEREAS, this amendment to the electrical ordinance in cooperation with the North
Central Texas Council of Governments Regional Codes Coordinating Committee will
help protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of North Richland
Hills; now therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, Section 20.3.A ELECTRICAL LICENSE REQUIRED shall be amended to read
as follows:
.
A.
Provide written evidence of successfully passing a written examination given by
the City's officially designated examining agency for the grade of license sought;
or,
.
2.
THAT, Section 23 ELECTRICAL LICENSING EXAMINATION PROCEDURES shall
be amended to read as follows:
SECTION 23. ELECTRICAL LICENSING EXAMINATION PROCEDURES
1. A person wishing to obtain a license for one of the grades of electrical licenses
issued by the City of North Richland Hills shall file a written application with the
City's officially designated examining agency. Such application shall be
completed and filed in accordance with the procedures prescribed by the
exammmg agency.
2. Examination fees, dates, times and places of the examinations, procedures for
administering the examinations, grading of the examinations, examination
security and examination results, repeat examinations, appeal of examination
scores, shall be sole responsibility of the agency administering the examination.
3.
.
THAT, Section 24. LICENSE EXAMINATION FEES shall be amended to read as
follows:
SECTION 24. APPROVAL OF EXAMINING AGENCIES
1. The City Council may authorize the City Manager or his appointed designee to
contract with an examination agency to perfonn examination services for the
licensing of electricians; or the City Council may authorize the City Manager or
his appointed designee to contract with other cities in the North Texas Region in
the fonn of an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement allowing the cities as a unit to
contract the services of an examining agency. The selected agency shall be the
City's officially designated examining agency and shall perfonn all examination
services requested by the City when issuing electrical licenses.
2.
The Building Official shall be authorized to approve those examining agencies
whose certificates of examination will be accepted by the City in lieu of the
certificate of examination issued by the City's officially designated agency. Such
agencies shall be known as alternate examining agencies. It shall be the
responsibility of the Building Official to review the qualifications and testing
standards of such agencies. The Building Official shall not approve an examining
.
-