The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1994-09-12 Agendas .. . . . Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. PW 94-30 Ratify Contract with Dustrol, Inc. for Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete Rejuvenation on Starnes Road from Rufe Snow to Crosstimbers (Agenda Item No. 28) (5 Minutes) 10. Other Items 11. Reminder: City Council/Planning and Zoning Joint Work Session - September 13, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. (IR 94-127 & IR 94-120) 12. *Executive Session (15 Minutes) a. Personnel b. Briefing on Pending Litigation c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition 13. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. ''';'",".'' " . ':~ .:~. . . - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1994 For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting August 22, 1994 5. Presentations by Boards & Commissions Beautification Commission Minutes 6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 7. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (12,13,14,15,16,17,18, 19,20,21,22,24,25,26,27,28,29, 30,&31) e - - Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 8. PZ 94-15 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Glen Good to Rezone Tracts 2B1, 2B2, 2B3, and 2B4, Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, from R-3 Single Family Residential to Planned Development Number 18 - Ordinance No. 2006 (Located in the 6500 block of Glenview Drive) 9. PZ 94-16 Request of Russell Brown for an Appeal Hearing Regarding the Rezoning of Lots 1 and 2, and a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Autrey Addition, from R-3 Single Family Residential to C-1 Commercial (Located at the southwest corner of Glenview Drive and Jackie Lee Street) 10. PZ 94-17 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Tommy Wright to Rezone Tract 2A3, Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential- Ordinance No. 2007 (Located in the 7900 block of Green Valley Drive) 11. PS 94-34 Request of G. C. Metroplex for Final Plat of Lot 1, Block H, Calloway Farm Addition (Located in the 7700 Block of Grapevine Highway) *12. GN 94-106 Approval of 1994 Certified Tax Roll - Resolution No. 94-42 · e e e Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *13. GN 94-107 Authorizing Homestead, Over 65, and Disability Exemptions from Ad Valorem Taxes - Ordinance No. 2009 *14. GN 94-108 Adopting the Tax Rate for 1994 - Ordinance No. 2008 *15. GN 94-109 Adopting 1994/95 Budget - Ordinance No. 2010 *16. GN 94-110 Authorization to Solicit Bids for Phase I of the Tennis Court and Practice Fields Project *17. GN 94-111 Approving the ISTEA Enhancement Grant Agreement with TxDOT for the North Electric Trail Project - Resolution No. 94-43 *18. GN 94-112 Consideration of an Amendment to the Building Code Regarding Foundation Elevations - Ordinance No. 2013 *19. GN 94-113 Consideration of an Amendment to the Building Code Regarding Grading and Excavation Perm its - Ordinance No. 2011 e . e Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *20. GN 94-114 Consideration of an Amendment to the Building Code Regarding Code Requirements for Relocated Buildings - Ordinance No. 2012 *21. G N 94-115 Resolution to Extend Review of Cable Service Rates - Resolution No. 94-44 *22. GN 94-116 Compliance of Household Hazardous Waste Interlocal Agreement - Resolution No. 94-46 23. GN 94-117 Award of Bid For Family Aquatic Park Phase II *24. GN 94-118 Approve Revision of Asphalt Street Design Requirements - Resolution No. 94-45 *25. PU 94-69 Authorize Purchase of Dictaphone Communications Master Recorder *26. PU 94-70 Sale of Police System 36 *27. PU 94-71 Approval of Sanitary Sewer Easement Across Iron Horse Golf Course to Serve Iron Horse West Addition e e e NUMBER *28. PW 94-30 *29. PW 94-31 *30. PAY 94-21 *31. PAY 94-22 32. IR 94-129 33. Page 5 ITEM ACTION TAKEN Ratify Contract with Dustrol, Inc. for Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete Rejuvenation on Starnes Road from Rufe Snow to Crosstimbers Award Bid on Walkers Branch Channel and Paving Improvements, Phase I Approve Final Pay Estimate NO.2 in the Amount of $22,927.81 to JRJ Paving, Inc. for 1994 Miscellaneous Street Subgrade and Surface Reconstruction Approve Final Pay Estimate NO.2 in the Amount of $3,837.22 to Shawn Mackey Construction Company for Holiday Heights Elementary School Northwest Parking Lot Citizens Presentation Ms. Mickey Margetis Re: Renovation of house at 8133 Precinct Line Road POSTW 4,/9é/ DatE' ---1 Õ I LJ m Time' Adjournment r~ City Secretary By 'r f ¡/1ILI:~/~ . . e INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 94-127 ~ V Date: September 8, 1994 Subject: Special Meeting for Apartment Requirements On Tuesday, September 13, 1994 the Planning and Zoning Commission is having a work session to discuss existing and proposed requirements for apartment construction. The meeting will be held in the Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m. Dan Boutwell, a planning consultant, will present suggested density and amenities requirements. The commission has invited Council Members to attend. under present regulations and zoned property, over 4,000 additional units can be constructed in North Richland Hills. This would be an opportune time to address this extremely important subject. :t,j;¡;j::¡tted, Deputy City Manager CAS/gp )' ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS - INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IR 94-120 No. ~ Date: September 12, 1994 T Subject: Multi-Family Dwelling Districts Recently, there has been considerable interest in apartment construction in northeast T arrant County. To this interest, the staff has prepared a map showing the areas where existing apartment complexes are located. Additionally, all vacant areas currently zoned for multi-f3rnily apartments are also shown on this map. According to the infonnation available, there are currently 4,444 multi-t3rnily units existing in North RicWand Hills. These vacant lands~' according to the zoning regulations, can be constructed at a maximum of 16 units per acre. Calculating the number of acres that are currently vacant by the 16 units per acre factor results in approximately 4,051 units that can be built in the City. The map showing these areas will be available at the next council meeting for your review and inspection. . 'ÓP=S~i~ Barry LeBaron . ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS . . . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - AUGUST 22,1994 -7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order August 22, 1994 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Lyle E. Welch Mark Wood Jo Ann Johnson Ray Oujesky Byron Sibbet Linda Spurlock Mayor Councilman Mayor Pro Tern Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Staff: C.A. Sanford Randy Shiflet Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Greg Dickens Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Secretary Attorney City Engineer Absent: Mack Garvin Rodger N. Line Jeanette Rewis Councilman City Manager City Secretary 2. INVOCATION Councilman Sibbet gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 8, 1994 APPROVED · e - August 22, 1994 Page 2 Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Wood, to approve the minutes of the August 8, 1994 meeting. Motion carried 5-0; Mayor Pro Tern Wood abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 5. PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PARK AND RECREATION BOARD MINUTES No action necessary. Mayor Brown and Delores Pultz, Beautification Commission Chairman, presented the ''Yard of the Month" awards to the following: Sam and Karen Griffith, 4501 Shady Lake; Scott and Kathy Creasman, 7113 Meadow Park North; Raymond and Stella Davis, 7404 Boca Raton; Terry, Lynda and Jayson Hamilton, 6533 Woodcreek; Bruce and Janice Correll, 4721 Redondo; Joseph and Sharon Camunez, 7628 Deaver Drive; and Dwight and Kerri Bloyd, 7720 Amy Lane. Mayor Brown and Delores Pultz, Beautification Commission Chairman, presented the "Landscape of the Month" award to Rufe Snow Village I 6238 Rufe Snow Drive. 6. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Sibbet removed Item NO.8 from the Consent Agenda. 7. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (9,13,14,15,17,18,19,20,21,22,&23) APPROVED Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 6-0. . . . August 22, 1994 Page 3 8. PS 94-30 REQUEST OF HOWARD STILES FOR SHORT FORM FINAL PLAT OF STILES ADDITION (LOCATED IN THE 8900 BLOCK OF RUMFIELD ROAD) APPROVED Councilman Sibbet advised he requested that this item be removed from the agenda on the request of the applicant. Reverend Stiles appeared before the Council. Reverend Stiles requested the Council to delete the requirement for the covenant for Kirk Lane. Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve PS 94-30 with the deletion of the requirement for the covenant for Kirk Lane. Motion carried 6-0. ... 9. PS 94-31 REQUEST OF JOHN VOLKMAN FOR REPLA T OF LOTS 24R-38R AND 41 R-57R, BLOCK 2, STONYBROOKE SOUTH ADDITION (LOCATED BETWEEN ODELL STREET AND RUTHETTE DRIVE) APPROVED 10. PS 94-33 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CHANGING THE NAME OF "EDISON DRIVE" TO "ROAD TO THE MALL" - ORDINANCE NO. 2001 APPROVED Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve Ordinance No. 2001. Motion carried 6-0. e . . August 22, 1994 Page 4 11. PS 94-40 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REVISIONS TO THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN REGARDING WILSON ROAD - ORDINANCE NO. 2002 APPROVED Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve Ordinance No. 2002. Councilwoman Spurlock advised she would like for this item to be postponed. Councilwoman Spurlock advised she would like for this portion of Wilson Road to be relocated to the south. After further discussion, Mayor Brown called for the question. Motion carried 6-0. 12. PS 94-41 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REVISIONS TO THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN REGARDING SIMMONS DRIVE - ORDINANCE NO. 2003 APPROVED Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve Ordinance No. 2003. Motion carried 6-0. . . . August 22, 1994 Page 5 *13. GN 94-99 COUNCIL FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH BOND REQUIREMENTS - RESOLUTION NO. 94-41 (POSTPONED AT THE 8/8/94 MEETING) APPROVED *14. GN 94-100 VACATE A PORTION OF AN EXISTING EASEMENT ON STONYBROOKE ADDITION, LOT 7, BLOCK 14 - ORDINANCE NO. 2004 APPROVED *15. GN 94-101 CONTRACT AUTHORIZING NETS FUNDING APPROVED 16. GN 94-102 PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED 1994/95 BUDGET Mr. Cunningham I Finance Director, presented highlights of the proposed 1994/95 budget. Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. The Council requested Staff to fund the Teen After School Program. *17. GN 94-103 CONSIDERATION OF ACTION ON ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO THE AWARD AND SALE OF $180,000 IN CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PUBLIC PROPERTY FINANCE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, SERIES 1994 - ORDINANCE NO. 2005 APPROVED . e . August 22, 1994 Page 6 *18. GN 94-104 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION APPROVED 18A. GN 94-105 AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT BIDS FOR THE GREEN VALLEY SOCCER COMPLEX AND COMMUNITY PARK APPROVED Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to approve GN 94- 105 and that plans be completed following the guidelines of the Corp of Engineers and other regulatory agencies and that the City Manager be authorized to advertise for bids. Mayor Brown advised that this item was not a public hearing. After discussion by the Council, Mayor Brown called for the question. Motion carried 4-1; Councilwomen Spurlock and Johnson, Councilmen Welch and Sibbet voting for, Councilman Oujesky voting against and Mayor Pro Tern Wood abstained from discussion and vote. *19. PU 94-65 AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF ADDITIONAL MOBILE VIDEO SYSTEMS APPROVED *20. PU 94-66 AWARD BID FOR CONSTRUCTION OF GLASS ENTRY ENCLOSURE AT THE ANIMAL CONTROL BUILDING APPROVED *21. PU 94-67 APPROVE BUDGETS FOR lWO ,TRAFFIC LIGHT SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECTS APPROVED *22. PU 94-68 RATIFY PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FOR CITY HALL EXPANSION PROJECT - LOT 5, BLOCK 32, RICH LAND OAKS TERRACE ADDITION APPROVED e . . August 22, 1994 Page 7 "'23. PAY 94-20 APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.3 IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,022.54 TO TRI-TECH CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR TEAKWOOD COURT DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED 24. CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mr. Dwayne Leslie, 7708 Ridgeway Court, appeared before the Council. Mr. Leslie stated he felt they were due an answer to their questions. Mr. Leslie asked the following questions: 1) Why did the State reject the grant application? 2) Why has the $500,000 grant been so important that the number of fields could not be reduced to eight because it would not pass for a grant and now the grant does not matter any more? 3) Why finish the design and take bids without a permit approval for the wetland? 4) Where will the increase in cost for moving the wetland come from? 5) What plans does the City have for the 48 acres located next to the water park and why could the soccer complex not be moved to that location? The following also appeared in opposition to the soccer complex: Mr. Jim Mace, 7605 Aubrey Lane Mr. Bob Bess, 7600 Ridgeway Mr. Tim Cox, 9013 Highland Oaks, appeared before the Council and requested information on the Star Center he had been hearing about. Mayor Brown advised Mr. Cox it was in the negotiating stage and to contact Mr. Sanford for further information. Mr. John Turner, 6509 Scarborough, appeared before the Council and expressed his thanks on behalf of the North Richland HiIIlWatauga area soccer players. Mayor Brown requested that Staff respond to the questions that had been asked. Mr. Jim Browne, Parks Director, responded to each of the questions that Mr. Leslie had asked. Mr. Chris Bess, 7600 Ridgeway Avenue, appeared before the Council and asked if their was another location the soccer fields could be built. · · · August 22, 1994 Page 8 Ms. Cindy Rose, 7704 Red Oak, appeared before the Council and advised her home was for sale because of the location of the proposed soccer project. Mr. Steve Billarreal, 6740 Dogwood Lane, President of Haltom/Richland Soccer Association, thanked the Council for their efforts. 25. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting. Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - Assistant City Secretary . #I. . . . . MINUTES OF THE BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE PRE-COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 July 19, 1994 ATTENDANCE Present: Deloris Pultz Jane Dunkelberg Alice Scoma Billie Sommermeyer Patsy Tucker Jeanne Lueck Chairperson Vice Chairperson Commission Member Commission Member Commission Member Commission Member Absent Emily Ward Commission Member STAFF Tim Hightshoe Christina Lopez Parks/Public Grounds Superintendent Secretary 1. CALL TO ORDER Ms. Pultz called the meeting to order July 19, 1994 at 7:15 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Ms. Tucker made a motion, seconded by Ms. Scoma, to approve the minutes of the June 21,1994 Beautification Commission meeting. Motion carried 6-0. 3. NEW BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION MEMBER Ms. Pultz introduced Ms. Jeanne Lueck to the Commission. Ms. Lueck was appointed to the Beautification Commission by Councilman Garvin in June of 1994. The Commission welcomed Ms. Lueck. Beautification Commission Minutes July 19, 1994 1 . - . could not be placed there without a great expense. Ms. Lopez will contact City Administration concerning the Keep Texas Beautiful awards presentation, at the August 8 City Council meeting, and will also send out invitations to the award winners inviting them to attend the Council meeting. Ms. Ounkelberg has been appointed to the Illegal Dumping Group which will meet quarterly. The ReOirectory Program had a very good turnout. Mr. Hightshoe will check in to graphics for the Bilingual Signs, and order those as soon as possible. Ms. Ounkelberg updated the Commission on the Adopt-A-Highway program. The Phi Theta Capa Sorority will adopt the highway by T.C.J.C..for two years. The Adopt-A-Highway application will be sent in soon. Ms. Tucker will also contact Mr. Hoppe to verify which area he has adopted in the Adopt-A-Spot Program. Ms. Pultz encouraged everyone to read their FYI reports. . The Commission decided their would not be a workshop on August 1, 1994. The Commission presented Ms. Ounkelberg with a cake to honor her for her achievements with Keep Texas Beautiful and for being presented the O. P. Schnabel Status Citizen Award. 7. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Pultz adjourned the meeting at 7:48 p.m. ~Ç3 l?ì ~ Deloris Pultz v' Chairperson Cristina Lopez Secretary . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections _ Council Meeting Date: 9/12/94 Subject: Public Hearing to consider the request of Glen Good to rezone Tracts 281, 282, 283, and 284, Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, from R-3 Single Family Residential to Planned Development Number 18. (Located in the 6500 block of Glenview Drive) Agenda Number: PZ 94-15 Ordinance No. 2006 Mr. Glen Good has four properties in the 6500 block of Glenview Drive under contract for purchase. Mr. Good proposes to develop the property to construct an assisted living center, a use similar to a nursing home/retirement center. The property is currently zoned R-3 Single Family Residential. He is seeking a zoning change to a Planned Development to allow the proposed use. The property under consideration is located between Honey Lane and Garden Park Drive. There are four very deep narrow lots with existing wood-frame houses. The property is bounded by single family dwellings on the east, west, and south. There is an apartment complex and day care center to the north. Mr. Good originally requested a zoning change to C-l Commercial. However, the Planning and Zoning Commission suggested he consider a Planned Development district. Mr. Good agreed to this recommendation, and it is being forwarded to the City Council for consideration. The attached ordinance, which will establish Planned Development Number 18, is based on the requirements of the C-l Commercial district. Some highlights of the ordinance include the following: · The property to the south, east, and west is zoned R-3 Single Family Residential. A masonry screening wall is required along the common property line between a residential and commercial district. There is approximately 1,571 linear feet of property where a masonry screening wall would be required. · Fifteen percent of the lot, or equivalent, is required to be maintained as a landscaped area. The ordinance will require 32,664 , square feet to be maintained as a landscaped area. However, the use of enhanced landscaping could reduce this requirement to 16,331 square feet. · A front building line of25-feet is required. Side building lines of 15-feet and a rear building line of25-feet would also be required. Any buildings on the property cannot cover more than 50% of the lot area. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at their August 25, 1994 meeting and recommended approval of a Planned Development District for an Assisted Living Center, basing the development restrictions on the C-l Commercial zoning district, and requiring a site plan to be submitted at the time of platting. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget - Other " -tr /)/ l - /' ~ ~Mr1~g~ [Mr «11·d-J~ Departmen~ead Signature ' City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of · · · ORDINANCE NO. 2006 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ESTABLISH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER EIGHTEEN; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Tracts 2B1, 2B2, 2B3, and 2B4, Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, consisting of approximately 4.99 acres located on the south side of Glenview Drive, between Honey Lane and Garden Park Drive are currently zoned R- 3, Single Family Residential, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed a proposal for an assisted living center for the elderly; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended that the property be rezoned as a Planned Development District to provide land use compatibility with adjacent properties; and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the following recommendation is submitted to the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by establishing PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 18, by changing the said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, Planned Development District Number 18 be hereby established in the Case Number PZ 94-15, on the properties described as follows: A. BEING Tracts 2B1, 2B2, 2B3, and 2B4, Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, consisting of approximately 4.99 acres located on the south side of Glenview Drive, between Honey Lane and Garden Park Drive which are currently zoned R-3, Single Family Residential, and also being the area shown on the attached Exhibit "A" and described by metes and bounds in subsection "B" below. B. Metes and Bounds Description: Being 4.999 acres situated in the Mahala Lynch Survery, Abstract No. 953, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, said 4.999 acres being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning at a point in Glenview Drive, being N 00° 07 . 01" W, 29.34 feet from the Northwest corner of Block 1, Glenview Park Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, as recorded in Volume 388-173, Page 88, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Ord.2006 Page 1 Thence, S 00° OT 01" E, at 29.34 feet pass a 1/2" iron found and the Northwest corner of said Block 1, and continuing in all 605.00 feet to a 5/8" iron found at the Northwest corner of Lot 2, Block 3, of said Glenview Park Addition; Thence, N 89° 38' 24" W, along the North line of said Block 3, and the North line of a tract of land conveyed to D. Higgins by deed recorded in Volume 3914, Page 289, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, 360.92 feet to a 1/2" iron found at the Southeast corner of Block 2, Nortex Subdivision to the City of North Richland Hills as recorded in Volume 388-M, Page 209, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Thence, N 00° 03' 53" E, along the East line of said Block 2, at 573.39 feet pass a 1/2" iron found at the Northeast corner of said Block 3, and continuing in all 605.00 feet to a point in said Glenview Drive; Thence, S 89° 38' 17" E, 359.00 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 4.999 acres of land. 2. THAT, the development regulations for Planned Development District Number 18 shall be as follows: 1. Purpose: Planned Development District Number 18 is intended to provide for an Assisted Living Center with development regulations similar to the C1 district, except where modified herein. 2. Permitted Uses: Assisted Living Center, not to exceed 60 elderly units, contained within a single-story structure which has residential architectural characteristics. 3. Lot Area Requirements: a. Minimum Lot Area: 1 acre b. Minimum Front Building Line: 25 ft. c. Minimum Side Building Line: 15 ft. d. Minimum Rear Building Line: 25 ft. e. Maximum Structure Height: single story structure f. Maximum Lot Coverage: 50 percent 4. Site Plan: To be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval at the time of platting the property. Notices to be mailed to property owners within 200 feet prior to approval of the site plan. 4. Fences: A masonry screening fence as required for the C1 District by Article 9, Section 910, Walls and Fences, Ordinance 1874, as amended. 5. Parking: As required by Article 7, Sections 700 and 710, Parking and Loading Requirements, Ordinance 1874, as amended. 6. Accessory Buildings: As required for the C1 District by Article 6, Sections 600 F & G, Accessory Buildings, Ordinance 1874, as amended. 7. Masonry Requirement: As required for the C1 District by Article 6, Section 600 B, Masonry Requirements, Ordinance 1874, as amended. 8. Landscaping Requirement: As required for the C1 District by Article 9, Section 900, Landscaping Standards, Ordinance 1874, as amended. 9. Signs: As established by the site plan. Ord. 2006 Page 2 . . . 10. Refuse Facilities: All refuse containers shall be screened from view of all adjacent properties and public streets. 11. Noise: As required for the C1 District, Ordinance 1874, as amended. 3. That, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this Planned Development District. 4. That, when uncertainty exists between the regulations contained in this Ordinance and the Zoning Regulations contained in Ordinance 1874, as amended, the provisions for the C1, Commercial Zoning District shall prevail. 5. That, all the regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance No. 1874, as amended, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Planned Development District Number 18, shall remain in effect regarding this property. 6. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 7. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage. Ord. 2006 Page 3 APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 25th DAY OF AUGUST, 1994. /J . I é' VJd¿,ø ~ Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 12th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1994. Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Ord. 2006 Page 4 02 . I EVONSHIRE . '.. 15 13 14 16 13 IE~h;bi'¡' I "A III 15 14 TR 28 13.36 Ac :T TR 282 1.234 Ac PD - I B TRACT A , I A2 C'4V(,' ,~ 1 .~~ .. 2 2 1 3 3 4 5 -j TR TR 282 283 TR 2A2A TR 281 TR 2A3 bl 10 10 11 Z ' I --.J 11 TR 2E4A >- I llJ TR 2F1A TR 2E48 Z 0 . :r: TR 2F18 TR 2E4C TR 2E4D TR 2F1C TR 2E2 TR 2E3 TA 2F1D TA 2E4E TA 2F2 TA 2E4F TR 2F1E -""'. ' '. ., ,... - -- I ( .,,.-- "... .. ----r-....,'-- I r .. I ' I II I II I' ' I II II~. . I 1~05 I;" 5í'--- W \i ::~___ CA ~ 1----::--.... II ( --...., I, ' , I I I L ... " '-:' +' I l I ,. .. ' \" .. - -' - - - I ' , I I ' I I II ~ ~ I I I ' I'" 2 I' ì \"" A.\ e! ~T ø \\ ~~ ~ J, M 'sv0RVéfr , :', r15~~ - - I I I ,_ - ::. - - - - _I I I - - - - -, I I I ' I I I I I I I l I I I 6 ~-___. . I I I I <Ql.@ ~NC >" <,.500 lA 18 2A 28 I IHI lR ,if, lOR i 198 ... 1 ~ TA 264 ~ a.. :: -.J llJ . ~ " 16R.: ':1: U ... .. 15F¡ ~ - "1 1 ;'; -~ - I I I 3 I I I I I 3 i I TR TR i TR 1 I 2 3 2G1 I 252 253 TR h, 4 2G:' I 2~..t Director Plan/lnsp Building Official Planner Plans Examiner ABSENT MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS August 25, 1994 - 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman James Brock at 7:30 ROLL CALL PRESENT Chairman Members James Brock Victor Baxter Don Bowen Ron Lueck David Barfield Richard Davis Jill Spièer. Barry LeB Steve P Cia e Husband ory Arrington aul Miller CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 11, 1994 Mr. Ba seco at made the motion to approve the minutes as presented. The motion was d by Mr. Bowen. The motion carried 6-0, with Mr. Lueck abstaining due to absence previous meeting. 1. PZ 94- 1 5 Public Hearing to consider the request of Glen Good to rezone Tracts 2B 1, 2B2, 2B3, and 2B4, Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, from R-3 Single Family Residential to C-1 Commercial. This property is located in the 6500 block of Glenview Drive. Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of the request to come forward at this time.. Mr. Glen Good, 4424 Misty Meadow, Fort Worth, came forward to speak. He stated he intends to develop the property as an assisted Ilving center. Chairman Brock-stated the Commission discussed during the work session making this property a Planned Development to alleviate the concerns of the neighbors. He stated he understands the biggest obstacle is the site plan requirement. He asked Mr. Good if he could agree to a planned development if the site plan requirement was waived at this time. Mr. Good stated yes; Mr. Davis asked if Mr. Good could agree to submitting a site plan at the time of platting. Mr. Barfield stated the planned development should be no more restrictive than the C-1 zoning district. Mr. Lueck stated his concern was approving a C-1 zoning change and then the property sell to someone else. PZ Minutes - Page 2 August 25, 1994 . Mr. Barfield stated this area is part of the redevelopment area identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Good stated they are looking at about a $3-million project. He stated he did not understand the need for a brick fence around the perimeter of the property. Mr. Baxter asked how many stories the structure would have. Mr. Good stated the building will be single story with approximately 60 beds. He stated they want to prototype this facility and take it other places. Mr. Baxter asked if the architecture would reflect a singe family character. Mr. Good stated yes. Mr. Barfield asked what the plans for the large open area at the rear of the pr~perty is. Mr. Good stated they intend to use the entire property. He stated they may move the building towards the rear of the property. Mr. Forrest Grubb, 6505 Towne Park, came forward to speak. He stated his concerns about adequate parking. He stated his concern about the facility turning into a nursing home. He stated he would have liked to see the property carry all the way to Honey Lane. Mr. Grubb stated he has not heard any complaints from the neighborhood. He stated the brick fence will help. . Ms. Norma Baxter came forward to speak. She stated there is a great need in the area for this type of facility. She stated she has known the applicant for many years. Mr. Paul Zoeller, 6521 Harmonson Road, came forward to speak. He stated his support for the project. There being no one else wishing to speak in favor, Chairman Brock called for those wishing to speak against the request to come forward at this time. Ms. Fern Cagle, 4025 Garden Park Drive, came forward to speak. She stated when she received her Special Use Permit for her Personal Care Home, she was told that a similar facility could not be located within one-half mile of hers. Chairman Brock stated he also had that concerlJ, but he is satisfied that the type of facility is different in nature than her facility. He stated that was the first thing he looked into. Ms. Cagle stated she does not agree. Mr. LeBaron stated the half-mile radius was to prevent two similar facilities from locating in the same neighborhood. He stated the facility in question is more a commercial type of facility than a home-based care facility. Mr. Barfield stated this facility will not affect the integrity of the neighborhood. He stated the ordinance was written to keep several of the homes from locating within a single area. . Mr. Lueck asked if the facility will harm her business in any way. Ms. Cagle stated she is not sure. Mr. Lueck stated he feels that it could help her business. PZ Minutes - Page 3 August 25, 1994 Mr. Barfield stated he would like the neighbors notified when the site plan is considered ¡- the Commission. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Davis made the motion to approve PZ 94-15 as a Planned Development for an Assisted Living Center, that the development restrictions on the property be no more restrictive than the C-1 district, and that a site plan be submitted at the time of platting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Barfield. The motion carried 7-0. 2. PZ 94-16 ion of Lot 3, Block 1, Autrey Addition, from R-3 Single Family Residential to C-1 ercial. This property is located at the southwest corner of Glenview Drive and Jackie eet. rock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to come is time. Mr. Russell Br n, 4705 N. Cascades, Fort Worth, came forward to speak. He stated he intends to conve the church into a fitness center. if Mr. Brown intends to pave the parking lot. Mr. Brown stated his init he does intend to pave the remodeling does not include paving the parking lot. He stated rking area in the future. Mr. Lueck asked if he has ana Mr. Brown stated Body Religion F Chairman Brock asked if Mr. Brown aware that the property would have to be replatted. Mr. Brown stated yes. Mr. Baxter asked how long ago the variance the parking lot was granted to the church. Mr. Husband stated February 1993. Mr. Barfield stated when the renovations exceed a cain amount, all the requirements of the C-1 Commercial district would have to be lTIet. H requirements. Chairman Brock stated a masonry screening wall would be required between this p and the residential area. Mr. Lueck asked how many people could be in the facility a Mr. Brown stated about 25 people, but he does not expect more an 10-15 people. He stated he will have weight machines and aerobic classes. He state 't would be a neighborhood gym. ' There being no one else wishing to speak in favor, Chairman Brock call to speak against the request to come forward at this time. Mr. William Jones, 4020 Chapel Park Drive, came forward to speak. He aske extensive the renovations will be. He stated the building is three feet from the Zoning Case Review Fact Sheet Case No. PZ 94-15 . Hearing Dates: PZ 8/25/94 CC pending REQUEST: R-3 Single Family Residential to C-l Commercial APPLICANT: Glen Good, Ft Worth TX PROPERTY OWNER: Sharon Hilbert, Ft Worth TX and RH. Leach, NRH TX SIZE AND LOCATION: Approximately 4.99 acres located on the south side of Glenview Drive, between Honey Lane and Garden Park Drive SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Existing wood frame houses. Several trees. PROPOSED USE: Assisted Living Center ALLOWED USE: Nursing Home ADJACENT ZONINGILAND USES . North South East West C-l/R-7-MF: existing day care center and apartment complex (Diamond Ridge Apts.) R-3: existing single family dwellings R-3: existing single family dwellings (Nortex subdivision) R-3: existing single family dwellings (Glenview Park subdivision) DRAINAGE According to Flood Insurance Rate Maps, this property does not lie within a 100-year or 500-year flood plain. mOROUGHFARE PLAN Access to this property is from Glenview Drive, classified as an M4U Minor Arterial on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. An M4U requires 70 feet of right-of-way, and is a 4-lane undivided roadway. LAND USE MASTER PLAN The Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan calls for single family development in this area. This request is not consistent with the Plan. ZONING mSTORY This property was initially zoned IF-7 Single Family Residential in 1967. The IF-7 zoning district required a minimum 7,000 square foot lots with minimum 1,000 square foot dwelling units. In 1984, the designation was changed to R-3 Single Family Residential. . TR 26 13,3E AC I ,'-.J~....__J l I ~ - , I ,. .. I I ¡ I I I .... I .. ., ¡ ~ 2 ~J ¡ ~( \>~,~ ~ ~I ~: ø vÞJ-l0J'f ~ J . M 'suR1vSAB I p,- n I I I I '_ - - - - - - _I I ------__ I I \ I I ,I I I I I I I I I >1EIDELd'JHG CT "'- -0: I : 26 27 11 9 f 8 "'-- ""~ TR 282 ,"'CT 1,234AC TRACT A s -- - -- L 2 . I ----' - - -- \ ~ .:. .; lA 196 ~ lR I'· lOR " ~ .. IT 0 110 ~ a. t:. .-J W a.' 6R ~ <3: I tiC U 0 15R ~ .., .. 110 -- 3 3 .:, ,= A¿ 4 , ---.¡ ¡ i TR i 2A2AI -:-c:¡ ?A3 ~R 2A28 10 10 I I -i- Z 11 ..J TR 2E4A >- 11 TR 2E48 TR 2E4C TR 2F1E 2 I 3 TR 2G1 TR TR 2G2 2G3 3 TR 2G5 TR 2E40 TR 2Fl0 TR 2E2 TR 2E3 TR.2E4E TR 2F2 1 4 TR 2E4F TRJ 2Fl' ! TR 2F 1 /~~ Thi~ Tarr ..".... · · · . , ,APPLICATION FOR A ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE Please print all responses PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPUCANT 1 AGENT: ) CITY 1 STATE 1 ZIP OF PROPERTY OWNER, xl? V /))6rF-I<AS750,":2. LEG.þ:L D~SCRIPTlON OF PR,QPERTY WHERE ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE IS BEING ~QUEST~D: _ .....J._ ~~()G- &S.;J..D i5&?/'.Þv-r~- ,))A..-. ~ ¡:;q.!j:?) T~ /- he., /~L- p!/), , ~t!/f.- STREéT ESS AT LOCATION WHERE ONlNG DISTRICT C NGE IS BEING REQUESTED: Ó.ser;. - h.':J:7D }J.¿/K~- Æ4, CITY OF NOATH AICHLAND HIlLS 7301 N E. LOOP 820 NOATH AICHLAND HIlLS. TEXAS 76180 17-561-5515 280/1 ð8öu1/ Aß03, .¡/J8c:>t.¡ t"f! 2"'1 2B2. 2'&3 zeA PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST CLRRENT ZONING: PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY, 1/6515T£D 1./¿I/IJ6 CE¡1JT£ HEASONFORCJlANGE:.. ~ ,.+.-;- ~ _.__/1,~ . . d.,.~ Th'~"" rL~Z-.£¢ ~..~,.2'i~~.~=/ ~~,,~~;~~v.t~,7k~J¿ ~~"¿.c.dL#~#~-/3,;.lf. ~ (.:-1 ~~~ SU111EY OR MAP A IT ACHED AS REQUIRED BY THIS FORM 1:20 YES ~ YES A IT ACH AFFIDA,,"" FROM PROPERTY OWNER IF APPUCANT IS NOT OWNER: [=:J NO o NO I ;7ereby certify that the above information is correct to the best of my knowledge, DATE: Æ~~, Y - tlL~ 3/ /C¡f'l Your Name (printed) (;LEA) J 600 D Signature . ~ PART 4. OFFICE USE ONLY P & Z PUBUC HEARING DATE: TAXES PAID? 25 J>..ù6.~'SL .:¡4 YES DNO CITY COUNCIL HEARING DA TE, UENS PAID? ~ YES ASSESSME::IJ,. PAID? ~ YES DNO DNO LONING DISTRICT CHANGE APROVED,- c::J YES c::J NO OAD, NO, S1 ¡PULA TIONS: ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE Page 1 01 2 CASE NUMBER,' 'f'2. ~- \5 FEE $300.00 ThiS application will nOl be s:hec1J8( lor public heanng una! tie appliCation tee is received, CD-044 (l-~) M., com,.I. II 0" by If I.ft J 00" UII". AftCI I M'O AfIIC'LOT I MATCH LINE· SEE PACr A~ II I~ J~ I ~ i~ J~ o J ~ ;~' I :"', ! i /' i . i . 2 ""d ~ : ~¡¡¡: 1 ! o. !2 ~ -+-; .. 0 : ;. · - .. .. ñ · II' n' : II .: A. ,f, õ: · = .. c: :... ... ~ .? '- ~ " ..., ..., ~ .,., ~ '" <:> ,........................................... ........................................ ; .. ... .....~~........ ....... ..." ......c.al, ., 00 . '. n ;........!....~. : ~. , ... c.a .........¡......:.. : .. ... o o " . " ......................................... ......................... : ,; : ~ .:; 1 ~¡:~ : ! 7. 1\:¡-~1J· '·1 ~ ¡ "I . ¡-(rh('i'l¡:JL - . . .. '·¡'I . ... OJ' ,,: " ,.",:,l..\.l,.:d...';;. 1 " .- ...................................... " I , ",.,.,"'-1'"",.."..,....,......,_. ~.~ ',;: \~¡~¡,ß¡~L.::IAL .1 _~ _j ~.... ,_.\. ¡ ;':7":"1I!":=:1 m: ¡=:.. .~'~~ -~r.f5~~ ;'i:_;~ .. . " 01&''''=.1...... .... -::; iu;...i JJ r¡a ¡ 'a ¡"II! 11 u, .r......., ~....I·...:..... w"'"... ~ L;;¡u:~~..;..j..L"' .:;1 .: ;,:~ ?!Æ~l~~~¡~l~,¡~~ '~:~jd.;U~¡~¡ 'f .i ----. ':~;':~"~-: ~=:t ...~. ....... ....~ ,... :" " " I ..,¡' ---.-.--. "p' i; ';. ._....................~~ -- ..- ...--- -0 N «) ~ I ~ (11 U 'If .. Ç) ,., ,., I . n I I . 0 I I .... 0 '" .- '........';;:.:...... '. :' 1 ~~j~~. ............ ........................... .. . -~ -¡r-tr ............................ n__'" ._. I ' " I ~ on I~§¡I ""i ............·......·_·;'..~l ¡! ~ 0 t -_.......n···..~..·1~ .. :'....tp........JC'J ["'- r ~ - - J ~~ uL_~ ~ .,: I ..............j I "...;-...........J.' ·.:......r':~..... '~. ···..·~··-t~··~···.. ( .:..·....·..t·....·..·.. . .~...;;; i .. ':'ì Ii Il '>'. ~.~ ~'1 ~I·:......·.......·\~: .. ~:" \ "=::::::"~Î..J -13¥~: , î 'Y l ~~ s?, I (111 ' i 8- , ~ "'.:. . :1 - II ··1 ¡ . +',11 ,J I......~.... :.1.._ h. _.¿,.~__ .1.___..._J__._ ·········I,:,,~.·,Lj~rJ..l;~LJ.., ~ . L "h T ';! . ! œ ! : ;¡ ,. , :;~ ,> Nt 1'..1 ÌJf;'Ttl "-"'- ." ~ -1:',·' ~T li :~~;~¡~~ I ~ n ,-- ',. ~ ¡ ........- . I ~__~:_:..j·i~lIE: ! ~ 'I' '.. "/' "~)" . . ............. ; "I: " n ,." _....t·......+..·~·..~...... ! ¡! ~ .-r;.... ¡ i .~ r....~..·....· ~{; i ~ ;.¿ ..i I :r,! . ,.,> " - 1- .. i:: ." 'f.. In i .!!t . : U¡¡N ,; ¡ ~ ¡ : .... . ....- ":. ¡:;!:I :'-J ¡!¡ ... ¡: . : . n I ~ . '\ :: r ¡i ; '.~., ... :. ~c.a.. . ¡ ,., ;; ~ I'''~ ! i ;;~ ! ~-n :Ia I " I ~ , . -..-.--- j" ;, ~þ. I., :' l..·, T ! ~ 1·,: ¡ '; '"') 'è i ~~_: ~"'T:!~J;~~J" .. 1 - 1- li:--1 /' \ /.) nj,,[J:·" " ':~~~~1 c) "~, '/, ::' \:<: - '·t ç (1} ,:~ L ~ ,;' -il-''-- D', ~" : . ..--- L .. F / fJ; ,~I, ¡ : ¡ ,; I :; L...~...... c.an ,-·..:.....·'d:J....·.·.........-l ::NL/ ~ ,~~.. I, T " ¡ .. I - 1...._::..·.. -, . ._..J ,I ¡" L_L~_ . -- .,- --1- - L:JV UI.J . , - , 1 '.: " . - I ~ ::.~ I.: -\ "1 :. I : Ii.' _~ .1. . "~·r:·t~1·'~"T: 1 ~ r~"'(7 _.i.. L ._ i I.. ¡ _.__ "': - M !:~::~:';:¡ ...................... " -;:}câ ......;..~..~~;~ ( ~,... .........-....-ø.... ,¡ ;. ~;.;, "" .......--............... ..........\". .-....... .....~.-: '~f'::'- -:--~. 7·......:..7 I ...::.....J..L....:... :: ~ I..·..·-~..{ [' ....:...... .....~.... I ~L"::.J ~__¡ : RUFf:,' SNOW DR II't ~ ..-...~.......... ;; n I .. ,., _I " I if 'J: ......................... õ : ;; ;;: ., ,. ......-..... .~...... ¡¡ ;¡. ;; .; ,¡: : ;; ._. _u_._______.. .__..- -- ': ~~ '1 ~ f:f ,.- 1/ õ / ¡_ hifJ~~/~ ~;~ , ! T"'/ \1 \........:-....1'....... ., ¡ , ¡' ¡, 'i ',I· . - .. .-. . ~ ,. ; ..: -"-... -- .~ I'! (.!",., · · · . . RUG-24-1994 10:56 RUSL 817 737 3224 P.01 f!¥Jt~ !lt~~(l~t!O REALTOAS ~ 6325 JUNEAU RD. FORT WORTH TEX.AS 76116 817·737·3224 August 24,1994 FAX TO CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS - A TT'N: PLAA1\ING & ZOl\¡ThG DEPT FAX TO TELEPHO~"E NO. 6~6-7~03 Total of! pages FAX FROM TELEPHONE 1'0.737-3224 Chairman, Planning and Zoning Department City of Nonh Richland Hills North Richland Hills, Texas Re: Case Number PZ-94-15 and Cue Number PZ-94-16 I have some concern 'I about the rezoning of Tratts 181,282, 2B3 and 2B4. Lync::h Survey, A-953 from R-J Single Family Residential to C-l Commercial. I also have concerns about the rezoning of Lots 1 and 2~ and a portion 01 Lot 3. Block 1, Autrey AdditioD, froUl R-3 SiDgle Famüy Residential to C-l ComlDer~iaI. The undersigned is the Owner/Trustee of Tract 2B. 1. M. Vandusen Survey, Abs. 1588. consisting of approximately 13.33 acres. My property is zoned C-1 Commercial and is situated just across Glenview Dr" on the nonh side ftom the subject property in Case Number PZ-94-l5 Likewise, I am the Owner/Trustee ofa 8.78 acre tract ofland (Tract 2B4, 1. M. Vandusen Survey. Abs. 1588). This property is zoned C·1 Commercial and is located at the Northwest comer of the intersection ofRuIè Snow Dr. and Glenview Dr., being directly across Glen"iew Dr. fÌ'om the subject property in Case Number PZ-94-16. I am Bot advene to the building of an Assisted Liviac Center. As a matter of fact my property bas been offered for sale in recent years for that same purpose of use and I would ultimately like to see such a development or a Retirement Center on the 13.33 acres. Additionally, the buyers of the property in Case Number PZ 94-15 considered buying a portion of the 13.33 acres and submitted a written offer for 4 acres. I was interested in setling. however, that small a parcel and other unfavorable conditions and terms of the offer, including the price, made it unfeasible and unacceptable Page 1 RESIDENTiAl AND COMMERCIAL ReALTY . INVESTMENTS . PROPERTY MANAGEMENT IMðf"'.'tOñ fu'......... .. ffOM .."......... ...... IMI' ill Mil...,......... by ut .... . "'..... .. ....... '" ~. cørracllDnll. ..'.,.t Sftd ~-.on.. or.. ..,. ,. .........,.. ...r.c-.I ßlJltt:', AUG-24-1994 10:56 RUSL 817 737 3224 p.a2. qn~a ~~~~~!~OREALTORSI My naaia concerns are: (1), that profit potential for my property win erode because of the new competition across the street, whicb is buying land at a price ratio many times lower than my 13.33 atre iavestment, originaDy punbased in year 1969; (1), that the City of NRH wiD not provide for adequale and necessary t100d and water drain.e improvements for tbe dilchal'le ofwaten which might flow from my properties on tbe north side oCGlenview Dr. as weD a. subject property and otben down below Glenview Dr., whether that be at Jackie Lee St. to the east or another route to tbe west of subject property; (3)9 tbat the City of ~'"R.II will tack on additional oo-site and otT-site obUgations and liability exposure risk and other unusual costs against the developer of my 13.33 acres, rather than makt tbe "new kid on the block" take on risk and UabUity by making monetary investment into these vital water control improvements. It is ia the best interests of all propertY ownen in the subjed area that the City of North Rithland HiDJ provide for adequate improvements to the water control problem. Part of my lands have been utilized for the development of the Castlewinds Apanments. Diamond Ridge Apartments and Food lion Store, all being situated on the north side of Glenview Dr. or adjoining Rufe Snow Dr. Most people will agree that those developments arc top quality and are pleasing to the sight. Most or tbose remaiuing uadeveloped lands would have beeD RUed with other quality buüdiDp yean ago if the City of North Richland IIiIJJ had provided proper udilities for the drainale of water from properties and developments situated above Tabor St. These drainale waten flowed down Rufe Snow Drive to Tabor St. and dumped onto my property. A CODcrete drainage outlet was constructed on Rufe Snow Dr. duriag the widening and reconstructioD of the thoroUlllfare in late 1969, when I aequired this property. Ultimately, the dumped water wound up at Gleuview Dr. at Jackie Street, creating aD ever inereasiDI dralnale ditch from tbat point on Rufe Snow Dr. at Tabor St. down to, Gte.view Drive. When Glenview Dr. was widened aad reconstructed the City inltaDed 6 It. radius concrete pipes under Gleaview Dr. at Jackie St. At that point the depth of the dnmale ditcb was approDJDately seventeen to tweaty feet below the luriate of Glenview Dr. Later, the City of N ortb RicbJand HID. caUed that run oft' water a "cnekft; then, in recent yean "designed'" anothrr "minor creek" from tbe runoff of water from the Casdewinda Page 2 RESIDeNTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ReALTY. INVESTMENTS. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 'NCW....._ "''"'''*.. ...... __ ___ ...... tilt . _ ...._ III' lIS _ .. ...... . -... '" proal. I:CWIftT_s. ..... ..,.¡ _ø_. 11"_ ,...... .,'IOCk_ _" ...."', ~. AUG-24-1994 10:57 RUSL 817 737 3224 P.03 . tVJ(f~ ta((l~~Cl~~o REALTORS' ApartmeDts complex in dose proximity to the western boundary of the Cütlewinds Apartments where it adjoins the Diamond Ridge Apartments. Now the City has two "creeks" coming down from the nonh side of my remainder land. ODe emerging from nc.r the east side of my property and one from Dear the west side of m)' property t the conßuence of which is situated Borth of Gleoview Dr. aDd in the vicinity of Jackie Street. After my purchase or the 11.855 sues (Tract 2B04 out of the J. M. Vandusen Survey, Abstract ISIS) in year 1969, tbe City of North Richland BiDs would not grant a penn it to build on this property until the owaer/seller fumished a document holding the owner/seUer responsible for the dbpositioa of the upstream water. Such documentation was furnished in the inltances of sales of property whereoa ultimately were built the Castlcwinds Apartments and the Food Lion Store. In addition the City required massive easements for the upstream water coming Ol1to my remainder property through new and IUler concrete pipes (up to sis feet in ndiuI). . AdditioDally, the City of North Ricbland Hills has placed another burden OD the owaer or future developer of the property, by establishiag requirements for off-site drainale aad ftood improve.lDeDb.. well as on-site improvements. Tbe off-site requirements are mauive. iDeluding coastraction of additional large concrete pipes under and throuch Glenview Dr.. (ontiDuial down Jackie St. for at least 100 feet and Includina risk and liability on DIY developer for any downstream OoodiDl which miøht be attributable to upstream waten above Gleaview Dr. Sucb burdeas and restrictive covenants have virtually prohibited aDY sale of the property for development. All or this has (ertainly created coostemadon for me and 1 bave beea damaged by the City of North Riehland BiDs' behavior and breach of trust. The iron)' of aU tbll is that more than lumcient laods alonl my ealt bouadaries adjaeeDt to Rufe Snow Dr. and my soutb boundaries adjacent to Glenview Dr.have been conveyed or deeded to the City of Nonb Riehl.nd Bill. for tbe purpose of recODltructinl and ...ideninl of the tborou&hf.~ and for constructing drain_Ie, sewer and otbtl' utility improvements. Tbae property tranÂers were made in about year 1969 or prior. From such time the City of North Rlcblud IIIIIs has not properly used tbis conveyed property for aU of the purposes vanted, eleetiDI to ignore the property owners' ripts, apd has diverted the flow of upstream water to the south and west onto aDd over my property inltead of constructing proper . Page 3 RESICENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL REALTY · INVESTMENTS · PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 1"'lOrmallOfl fum..... '. ".,... ....n:.. ~.... N'Þ'" buI . ,.. ~.,...... .... ... ..., .. ~ .. -..... ... llrice. c.~. ...""" ..... ."......'.. D'." ,.... N .tW1CIf..... _~.,. nm.C'.t AUG-24-1994 10:57 RUSL 817 737 3224 P.04. t!¥J~~ !tt~~~fÎ~~g REALTORS; :~. uodel"p'OUDd facilities to carry the flow of water down Rufe Snow Dr.and beyond Glenview Dr. to a proper oudet. The e:lcess of lands CODveyed for utility purposes aDd widea.iag and not used on R.ufe Snow Dr. and/or Glenview Dr. have Rot beeD redeeded to me as provided. I EMPHATICALLY PROTEST THE REZONING OF THE REFERE.:."iCED PROPERTIES UNDER THE PRESENT 'UNTENABLE SITUATION OF NOT RAVING PROPER AND ADEQUATE WATER DRAINAGE FACll.ITIES GOING TO THE SOUTH OR WEST FROM MY 8.78 ACRE A..~ 13.33 ACRE PROPERTIES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GLENVlEW DR. FURTHER, NO REZONING SHOULD TAKE PLACE IN THE AREAS SOlTTH OF GLEN VIEW DR. WEST OF RUFE SNOW DR. tTNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AGR.EES TO: (1), PROVIDE PROPER A.1\JD ADEQUATE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE AREAS AFFECIED; (2). TAKE OVER ALL OF THE RESPONSlBlLITY OF SERVING THIS A~ AND (3), RELIEVE THE OWNERSIDE\'ELOPERS (OF THE AFOREMENTlO1\""ED 8.78 ACRE TRACT AND 13.33 ACRE TRACT) OF ANY AND ALL OFF-SITE RISK, MONEY OBLIGATIONS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH OFF-SITE DRAINAGE PROBLEMS! Please eater this communÎcatioD iato the official miD utes of the Public Hearings set for August 15, 1994. You may read it to the public at those HearinKs or bave someone else present it. 1 wiD welcome a response from YOII on my above thoupts regarding soMnl tllis dilemma ia the near future. A foUowup wiD advise the Mayor and City MaDager of my position on this matter. Because of sickness I will be unable to attend the Public Hearings on Thursday, August 25. 1994. Thank you! /;p.~.t.A)~ --µ.~ Richard W. Russell 6325 Juneau Rd. Fort Worth, TX 76116-1613 Telephone 137-3224 (answering device-leave a message) FAX 737-3224 -code "RUSL'· (24 hours-set for unattended mode) , Page 4 RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL REAL TV · INVESTMENTS · PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 1"_" fu,_. ,_ __ __ _...... _....,__ aw ... ~ ..........~ in ._. __ ..-tOrl./IO __. "..., ..- IW ..."......IlOl""'" ...."",. TOTAL P.04 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 9/12/94 Subject: Request of Russell Brown for an Appeal Hearing regarding the rezoning of Lots 1 and 2, and a portion of Lot 3; Block 1, Autrey Addition, from R-3 Single Family Residential to C-l Commercial. (Located at the southwest comer of Glenview Drive and Jackie Lee Street) Agenda Number: PZ 94-16 Mr. Russell Brown has a property located at the southwest comer of Glenview Drive and Jackie Lee Street under contract for purchase. This property is the site of the Foursquare Gospel Church, which Mr. Brown wishes to convert into a health and fitness center. Mr. Brown is seeking a zoning change to C-l Commercial to allow the proposed use. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at its August 25, 1994 meeting and recommended denial by a 4-3 vote. There were several concerns brought up by the adjacent property owners in regards this request: 1. An increase in traffic was a major concern of those persons who spoke at the public hearing. The only driveway access to this property is from Jackie Lee Street, a dead-end residential street. There is not enough room on the property to provide access from Glenview Drive. 2. Several persons expressed their concerns over increased noise. The existing church is only used twice a week. The proposed hours of operation for the fitness center are 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Friday, and possibly half day on Saturday. 3. The compatibility of a fitness center in this neighborhood was also in question. The church is an allowed use in an R-3 zoning district, but a fitness center would require a zoning change to C-l at the minimum. According to Section 200 of the Zoning Ordinance, all zoning cases denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission are only heard by the City Council after the City Council has approved an appeal request. A request for an appeal must be submitted in writing within 10 days of the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. Attached is a letter from Mr. Brown requesting the City Council consider this case. The earliest date the City Council could consider this case is October 10, 1994. RECOMMEND A TION: It is recommended that the City Council consider setting a Public Hearing date of October 10, 1994 for considering this zoning change request. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget t&= Other "~ "D ð ., (j !~ r ~ Dep~s~~ r City Manager ........ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of · _ ''"-' ,...., :- N-. a')"' ,. ,-' . -...;....... 3:), ..Jv.... ~..:: _ ... ¡ , .~ ^:¡~ _~O¡:) LC _)',_ <'):: ~160 c; - ~< ~-t ~_, :. :3=: -- ,.~' <. ,.." ,-" --> '~- ~:' _.ec.~ '," "J',- :-~i"';5Da :lC ::et. r;: 7 ~4-~b .- ~"-: -: .) ~: ... __ '__ '¥~ :-, \J <~ T· ~ a t~ ~ :] ..-. c>. P P e 2 i. :::; ,.... í '"' ' .= í: ' ,...; ._-,CBS::::: 1'r. ' _. - :':'2'1 " ~ Oc, ~ ~ ,Y' ~'liqliSO c: u a r',''''", ~, ' '" . ,¿ Z 0 ¡; ,;. :~, ',:...,-~ +- '-'''::;; . , ,¡,; ';":,-: ,h, ~ ~e p , ' iopeít'/ · '. '=: ;.:, ,? .~ :~::3. t- ¡...o" --.... ~,:: '-- ..i ;-. " .". lan~< \/0'...; ....~,.. .'ç' ,;:?t '" "'., ___ YOUy' ~ep~2fnDel· .J_:38 1 sta nCr.":' ¿~- ' ~ussell Browe b~ , ~~ · '. '" '",,1 -,J /"', r" J ::~:- ¿ CJ'~ I - >< '-' -:: L 7(~:"::ï ,- (";: ~:¡ /~ :;:'3'(:' ~:¡e f\nOWìì as the . ~ .=31,...... ';~g.. PZ Minutes - Page 3 August 25, 1994 Mr. Barfield stated he would like the neighb the Commission. to speak, Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Davis mad motion to approve PZ 94-15 as a Planned Development for an Assisted Living Ce , at the development restrictions on the property be no more restrictive than the Istrict, and that a site plan be submitted at the time of platting. The motion was 2. PZ 94-16 Public Hearing to consider the request of Russell Brown to rezone Lots 1 and 2, and a portion of Lot 3, Block " Autrey Addition, from R-3 Single Family Residential to C-' Commercial. This property is located at the southwest corner of Glenview Drive and Jackie Lee Street. Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to come forward at this time. ' Mr. Russell Brown, 4705 N. Cascades, Fort Worth, came forward to speak. He stated he intends to convert the church into a fitness center. Chairman Brock asked if Mr. Brown intends to pave the parking lot. Mr. Brown stated his initial remodeling does not include paving the parking lot. He stated he does intend to pave the parking area in the future. Mr. Lueck asked if he has a name for the facility. Mr. Brown stated Body Religion Family Fitness Center. Chairman Brock asked if Mr. Brown was aware that the property would have to be replatted. Mr. Brown stated yes. Mr. Baxter asked how long ago the variance on the parking lot was granted to the church. Mr. Husband stated February 1993. Mr. Barfield stated when the renovations exceed a certain amount, all the requirements of the C-1 Commercial district would have to be met. He stated staff can brief him on the requirements. Mr. Lueck asked how many people could be in the facility at one time. Mr. Brown stated about 25 people, but he does not expect more than 10-15 people. He stated he will have weight machines and aerobic classes. He stated it would be a neighborhood gym. ' There being no one else wishing to speak in favor, Chairman Brock called for those wishing to speak against the request to come forward at this time. Mr. William Jones, 4020 Chapel Park Drive, came forward to speak. He asked how extensive the reIlovations will be. He stated the building is three feet from the property Ii.. Chairman Brock stated a masonry screening wall would be required between this property and the residential area. PZ Minutes - Page 4 August 25, 1994 . Mr. Jones asked if the building could be two stories. He asked what the hours of operation would be. He stated there is quite a drainage problem between these properties and the parking lot could compound this problem. He stated his opposition to the request. Chairman Brock asked if the building will be enlarged. Mr. Brown stated he intends to extend the building towards the street with a sun room. He stated he intends to construct an 8-foot wall on the site. Chairman Brock asked if he intends to construct a second story. Mr. Brown stated no. Chairman Brock asked what the proposed hours of operation are. Mr. Brown stated 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Friday, possibly an abbreviated day on Saturday. He stated he does not "intend to open on Sundays. He stated he feels the nature of Glenview Drive is commercial. He stated the church must sell to someone who will use the building as a home or church since it is zoned residential, unless the zoning is changed to allow more types of uses. Mr. J.R. Landers, 4016 Chapel Park Drive, came forward to speak. He stated his concern about the building being so close to the property line. He stated his concern about the drainage on the property. He stated he does not want the area to go commercial. He stated his opposition to the request. . Mr. Barry Hutsell, 4029 Jackie Lee Street, came forward to speak. He stated his concerns about the possible increase in traffic and the safety of the children in the area. He asked if there would be a visual barrier between the parking area and the residences. Mr. Brown stated there is no parking entrance off of Glenview Drive. He stated he does not plan to install a fence along the street side of Jackie Lee since that is the only entrance to the property. He stated he would have the same parking as the church, but he does not intend to lease parking from Lone Star Gas. Mr. Hutsell stated the entrance to the property is several lots deep onto the street. He stated his concern over the integrity of the neighborhood. Chairman Brock stated Mr. Brown would have to meet the parking requirements of the City. He stated the City will not allow access from GJenview Drive. Mr. Hutsell stated his opposition to the request for commercial zoning. ~s. Judy Walker, 4033 Jackie Lee Street, came forward to speak. She stated the proposed fence would cut off access to her back yard. She stated she has a gate in the back yard to allow her to park her boat. Mr. Davis asked if she is crossing the church property to access her back yard. . Ms. Walker stated yes. She stated she has always had a good relationship with the church. She stated her concerns about traffic and noise. She stated her opposition to the request. There being no..one else wishing to speak, Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Barfield stated his concern over the commercial designation. He stated this area is also a redevelopment area, and the Commission should decide where they draw the line on what types of development they want to encourage. PZ Minutes - Page 5 August 25, 1994 Mr. Baxter stated he wants to see development in this area, but the neighborhoods still net.. to be protected. He stated the residents have very valid concerns. Mr. Bowen made the motion to deny PZ 94-16. The motion was seconded by Mr. Baxter. The motion carried 4-3, with Mr. Bowen, Mr. Baxter, Mr. Davis, and Mr. Lueck voting for denial; and Chairman Brock, Mr. Barfield, and Ms. Spicer voting against denial. 3. PZ 94-17 ey, Abstract 1266, from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential. This property ted in the 7900 block of Green Valley Drive. Chairm Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to come forward a is time. Mr. Doug Lon 1615 Precinct Line Road, came forward to speak. He stated the tract is currently zoned iculture and they are requesting R-2 zoning to develop the property. 5 Ember Oaks Drive, came forward to speak. He asked if sidewalks lIey Drive when the property is developed. Mr. LeBaron stated yes, bu 'nce it is such a small increment of the road, the Public Works Department may request esc funds in lieu of construction. He stated it is difficult on a collector street to determine w the final grade of the roadway will be for such a small portion. , CITIZEN COMMENTS None. rock closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Duxbury stated his concern for c Mr. LeBaron stated it is possible to do som emporary asphalt sidewalks. He stated some of the property is not platted and that makes it icult to place sidewalks because there is no room. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairm Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve PZ 94-17. The motion carried 7-0. tion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. STAFF REPORT Mr. LeBaron stated that sometimes the City may install tempo with the school district. Mr. LeBaron reminded the Commission about the Commissioners w shop Monday night in Hurst. He stated they have several places reserved if anyone would e to attend. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. James Brock, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commis~ Victor Baxter, Secretary . Planning and Zoning Commission .' RUG-24-1994 10: 56 RUSL 817 737 3224 P.01 !!»(ja ~~~ã't~o REALTORS~ · 6325 JUNEAU RD. FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76116 817·737·3224 August 24,1994 FAX TO CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS - A TT'N: PLANNING & ZO~ThG DEPT FAX TO TELEPHO~"E NO, 6S6-7!03 Total of 5 pages FAX FROM TELEPHONE NO. 737-3224 Chainnan, Planning and Zoníng Department City of Nonh Richland Hills North Richland Hills, Texas Re: Case Number PZ-94-15 and Case Number PZ-94-16 I have some concern' about the rezoning of Tracts 1B1, 281, 283 and 2B4, Lyncb Survey, A-953 from R-J Single Family Residential to C-l Commercial. I also have concerns about the rezoning of Lots 1 and 1, and a portion 01 Lot 3~ Block 1, Autrey Addition, from R-3 Sinlle Family Residential to C-l Commer~ial. · The undersigned is the Owner/Trustee of Tract 2B. 1. M. Vandusen Swvey, Abs. 1588. consisting of approximately 13,33 acres, My property is zoned C-l Commercía1 and is situated just across Glenview Dr, on the north side ITom the subject property in Case Number PZ-94-l5 Likewise. I am the Owner/Trustee ofa 8.78 acre tract of land (Tract 2B4, 1 M. Vandusen Survey, Abs, 1588). This property is loned C-1 Commercial and is located at the Northwest corner of the intersection ofRufe Snow Dr and Glenview Dr., being directly across Glenview Dr. &om the subject property in Case Number PZ-94-16, I am Bot advene to the building of an Assisted Living Center. As a matter of fact my property has been offered for sale in recent years for that same pUIpose of use and I would ultimately like to see such a development or a Retirement Center on the 13.33 acres. Additionally, the buyers of the property in Case Number PZ 94- 15 considered buying a portion of the 13.33 acres and submitted a written offer for 4 acres. I was interested in setling. however, that small a parcel and other unfavorable conditions and terms of the offer, including the price. made it unfeasible and unacceptable · Page 1 RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL REALTY . INVESTMENTS . PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ìlltO'fItII....,on 'u'....~ '. ffO~ 1OwI...........Ø '..... tli4J1 .. I'Gt .-rarrteeod by ut .... .. ""...... ,. ....... In plK8. ca..,.ectKmS. "'Ch,' ,.."d (WtM",c,IOt\_, ør." .iIMs", wllI'dl"wAl ...."',.11 nuhi':'r RUG-24-1994 10:56 RUSL 817 737 3224 P.02 ~(Çr.r ~~~i~!~o REALTORS' My main concerns are: (1), that profit potential for my property will erode because of the new competition across the street, which is buyiDg land at a price ratio many times lower than my 13.33 acre investment, originally purchased in year 1969; (1), that the City of NRB wiU not provide for adequate and necessary flood and water drainage improvements for the discharae ofwaten whicb might flow from my properties on the Dorth side orGlenview Dr. as weD as subject property and others down below GIenview Dr., wbether tbat be at Jackie Lee St. to the east or another route to the west of subject property; (3). that the City of l't"RH will tack on additional oo-site and off-site obligations and liability exposure risk and other unusual costs against the developer of my 13.33 acres, rather thaD make the "new kid on the block" take on risk and liabUity by making monetary io\'estment into these vital water control improvemeat5. It is in the best interests of all property owners in the subject area that the City of North Richland Hips provide for adequate improvements to the water conþ-OI problem. Part ofmy lands have been utilized for the development of the Castlewinds Apartments. Diamond Ridge Apartments and Food Lion Store, all being situated on the north side of Glenview Dr. or adjoining Rufe Snow Dr. Most people will agree that those developments are top quality and are pleasing to the sight. Most or tbose remaiDiug undeveloped land. would have been fined with other quality buildings years ago if tbe City of North Richland Hills had provided proper utUlities for tbe drainage of water from properties and developments situated above Tabor St. These drainale "aten flowed down Rufe Snow Drive to Tabor St. and dumped onto my property. A concrete drainage outlet was constructed on Rufe Snow Dr. during the widening and reconstndioo of the thoroughfare in late 1969, when T acquired this property. Ultimately, the dumped water 'Woud up at GleDview Dr. at Jackie Street, creating an ever increasing dniDale ditch from tbat point on Rufe SDOW Dr. at Tabor St. down to, GleDview Drive. When Glenview Dr. was widened aad reconstructed the City instaDed 6 It. radius concrete pipes under Glen view Dr. at Jackie St. At that point the depth oftbe dramale ditcb wu approDJDately seventeen to twenty feet below the surface of Glenview Dr. Later, tbe City of North Richland Hills called that runoO' water a "creek"; then, in recent yean "desiped" another "minor creek·· from the runo1fofwater from the Castlewinds Page 2 RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAl.. ReA~TY. INVESTMENTS. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I"_ormal" ''''~ IS II'CII'R -"';'" ~ ,... tl.tt . noI: guar...... by UI .,., IS --..ø ta ~ I" pr~, Cor"'~T1CIft1. iI'fI'OIS ~ ~I""S"V'I. P'II'" .,." ~ .lrhd~"aI .tfI'tt~ul .1I.u.r... . . . " f=1UG-24-1994 10:57 RUSL 817 737 3224 P.03 ¡VJ(f12 c:t~~~~~~O REALTORS· Apartmeots complex iD dose proximity to the western boundary of tbe Castlewiods Apartments where it adjoins the DiamoDd Ridge Apartments. Now the City has two "creeks" coming down from the Donh side of my remainder land. one emergiol from pear the east side of my property and one from near tbe west side of my property t the confluence of wbim is situated nortb of Gledview Dr. and in the vicinity of Jackie Street. After my purchase oftbe 11.855 aues (Tract 2B04 out ofthe J. M. Vandusen Survey. Abstract ISIS) in year 1969, the City of Nortb Ricbland BiBs would not grant a permit to build OD this property until the owner/seller furnished a document bolding the owner/seUer respoDsible for the disposition of the upstream water. Such do<:umentation was furnished in the inst.n~es of sales of property whereon ultimately were built the Cutlcwiods Apartments and the FDod Lion Store. ID additioD the City required massive easements for the upstream water comiog onto my remainder property through new and larger ~oncrete pipes (up to six feet in radius). Additionally, the City of Nortb Ricbland Hills has placed another burden OD the owner or future developer of the property, by establishing requirements for off-site drainale aDd f100d improvements al well as on-site improvements. The oft'..site requirements are masliv~ iDeluding construction of additional large con~rete pipes under aDd throueh Glenview Dr.. conÔDuinl down Jackie St. for at least 100 feet and Including risk and liability on lIlY developer for any downstreaJD DoodiD&: whicb might be attributable to upstream waten above Glenview Dr. Such burdeos and restrictive covenants have ~irtually prohibited aDY sale of the property for de\'elopment. All Df this has certainly created t::onstemation for me and 1 bave b~D damaged by the City of North Richland Bills' behavior and breach ot trust. The iroDY of all tbls is tl1at more than lumdent laods alonl my ealt boondaries adjaceDt to Rufe Snow Dr. and my soutb boundaries adjacent to Glenview Dr.have been conveyed or deeded to the City of North Richland Bills for the purpose ofrecoDstructin& and ...¡deniDI: of tbe tboroupfares, and for cDnstructing drainale, sewer and otber utility improvements. Tbese property transfers were made in about year 1969 or prior. From such time the City of North Ricblaad HiIb bas not properly used this conveyed property for aU of the purposes granted. electina to ignore the property owners' rilbts, alld has diverted the flow of upstream water to the south and west onto aad over my property instead of constructing proper Page 3 RESIOENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL REALTY · INVESTMENTS · PROPERTY MANAGEMENT "''\10'''''''10'' 'uml"'~ .s 'ram MWn:n 1;3...... feþ'" Þul .. "CIII. VU..nw.d þv .... 4If1d IS ,ubtIfct 10 Qtta.... '" prie.. COl~. ""ÕI" ",Id ðfftl"'OI'''. ør.H A...... N .,.,'d'.... .,1\I\t..,. nm.It'.C' HUG-24-1994 10:57 RUSL 817 737 3224 P.04 !!¥J(f~ :tfQ~~tI~~g REALTORS; :r;, underground facilities to carry the flow of water dow1I Rufe Snow Dr.and beyond GJenview Dr. to a proper oudet. The excess of lands C:Odveyed for utility purposes aDd widening and not used on Rute Snow Dr. and/or Glenview Dr. bave not beeD redeeded to me as provided. I EMPHATICALLY PROTEST THE REZONING OF THE REFEREl~CED PROPERTIES UNDER THE PRESENT 'UNTENABLE SITUATION OF NOT RAVING PROPER AND ADEQUATE WATERDRAJNAGE FACIT.ITIES GOING TO THE SOUTH OR WEST FROM MY 8.78 ACRE AND 13.33 ACRE PROPERTIES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GLENVlEW DR. FURTHER, NO REZONING SHOULD TAKE PLACE IN THE AREAS SOUTH OF GLEN VIEW DR. WEST OF RUFE SNOW DR. UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE CITY OF NORTH RlCHLAND HILLS AGR.EES TO: (1), PROVIDE PROPER A.~D ADEQUATE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE AREAS AFFECTED; (2), TAKE OVER ALL OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SERVING THIS AREA. AND (3), RELIEVE THE OWNERSIDEVELOPERS (OF THE AFOREMENTIOl\'"ED 8.78 ACRE TRACT AND 13.33 ACRE TRACT) OF ANY AND ALL OFF-SITE RISK, MONEY OBLIGATIONS, AND RESPONSIBlLlTIES ASSOCIATED WITH OFF-SITE DRAINAGE PROBLEMS! Pleue enter this communication into the official miD utes of the Public Hearings set for Angwt 25, 1994. You may read it to the public. at tbose Heariols or bave someone else present it. I wiD welcome a response from you on my above thoulbts regardiDl soMol tbis dilemm. in the near future. A foUowup wiD ad\'ÎSe the Mayor and City MaDager of my position on this matter. Bcçausc of sickness I will be unable to attend the Publíc Hearings on Thursday, August 25. 1994. Thank you! /;p~.~~ Richard W. Russell 6325 Juneau Rd. Fort Worth, TX 76116-1613 Telephone 737-3224 (answering device-leave a message) FAX 737-3224 -code "RUSL'· (24 hours-set for unattended mode) ,j Page 4 RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL REAL TV · INVESTMENTS · PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 1~1Orma1"" fur....r.d II "om _ _ ,_ IIuI it _ fU&tÞlMlf Iv ... _ .. "'1IiICI . aIIeI>Qe in ... _...-. ...fot. aft(! C1"'_. f"" ~ '" ",IIIIIr....... ..,1""'" 'U.<r' TOTAL P.04 , . Zoning Case Review Fact Sheet Case No. PZ 94-16 . Hearing Dates: PZ 8/25/94 CC pending REQUEST: R-3 Single Family Residential to C-l Commercial APPLICANT: Russell Brown, Fort Worth TX PROPERTY OWNER: International Foursquare Gospel Church, Los Angeles CA SIZE AND LOCATION: Approximately 19,540 square feet located at the southwest corner of Glen view Drive and Jackie Lee Street. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Existing church buildings with gravel parking lot. PROPOSED USE: Health and Fitness Center ALLOWED USE: Spa, Health Studio, Fitness or Recreation Center ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES . North South East West C-l: vacant commercial property R-3: existing single family residences (Autrey subdivision) R-3: existing single family residences (Autrey subdivision) R-3: existing single family residences (GIenview Park subdivision) DRAINAGE According to Flood Insurance Rate Maps, this property does not lie within a 100-year or SOO-year flood plain. mOROUGHFARE PLAN Access to this property is from Jackie Lee Street, classified as an R2U Residential thoroughfare on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. An R2U requires 50 feet of right-of-way, and is a 2-lane undivided roadway. LAND USE MASTER PLAN The Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan calls single family residential development in this area. This request is not consistent with the Plan. ZONING mSTORY This property was initially zoned IF-7 Single Family Residential in 1967. The IF-7 zoning district required a minimum 7,000 square foot lots with minimum 1,000 square foot dwelling units. In 1984, the designation was changed to R-3 Single Family Residential. The Zoning Board of Adjustment considered a request by the church in February 1993 to expand one of the buildings. The building is a legal non-confonning structure. The request was approved subject to two requirements: the gravel parking lot be paved by February 25,2003; and the property be replatted into a single lot prior to any additional building penn its being issued. . 579 N229 I- N5C 4 (f) 5150 TR N50 TR 203 204 I 5100 1.35 AC I- 38 A w 550 CD 9 6 I 14 I 10 13 \ i 12 1,..---::--.... ( __~, ¡I I I ' , I I I L... "r.... I , ' . ' ~ ~ ~ - _I \ I I' ' I 'I I I I ..; I I I .. , I' 2 I' \ ' \j¡).NO~ : I J . M 'Su8'iE!:.,!:e II, Vi5~1 - - I I I ,- - :. - - - - -' II ----- I , I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .... - / / / / / / " / _./ " '" - - c:;:;) 3,..;': ,- 7'1.:1 f.' ~NN .- ~, r1ír\GL.~ .1, '0).;/ (SJ)'Orþ.OOI'1 f·~· ;;¿,~ TR.284 7.22 Ac ;? i? TR 283 TR 284 i? 3 3 TR 2G5 TR 2G7 TR 2GB TR 2G3 TR 2G2 TR 2G1 TR 2H1A .876 'ª 4 1 2 3 I ..----- I 1 " 1 I 2 I " I 19 18 17 16 15R 14R ..: ~. o ? -, TR,2B4A 1,56 @ r 11 1.407 Ar .., .., :; 10 TR 2H1 2.186 AC TR 2H2A _ L I.-. _ '~p. 0' · · · " . Please print all responses APPLICATION FOR A ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE CITY OF NOATH AICHLAND HILL.." '" c, ...OOP 820 , TEXAS 78180 15 PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION ow~ CAS~"'LJES PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION NAME OF PROPERTY OVIINER: ()cJ~ S6ùl~JtE STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER: LÐVI/I¿~ ~ TELEPHONE NUMBER OF APPUCANT: 8'/7 - rð"S-- /3/ COIJT/lAcr TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY WHERE ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE IS BEING REOUESTED, VIEW ¡)d PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST ClRRENT ~/~ k/:ASON FOR CHANGE: T?J A£UJe.I tiS t: SU1\IEY OR MAP ATTACHED AS REOUIRED BY THIS FORM' c:J YES ONO I ¿' ,A1~~ /.;1. {fLOCK 3 o ATTACH AFFIDA \I!'T FROM PROPERTY OWNER IF APPUCANT IS NOT OWNER: ~ YES 1,1ereby certify that the above information is correct to the best of my knowledge. DATE: J- s-- '1 c( Your Name (printed) ~l.Js'.l- Lf.4::/w~ . PART 4. OFFICE USE ONLY P & Z PUBLIC HEARING DATE . '15' Þ-ù" \,)$1 ~ i CITY COUNCIL HEARING DA TE ¿ONING DISTRICT CHANGE APROVED c:J YES c:J NO OAD, NO SllPULA TIONS ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE c::J NO YES DNO LIENS PAID' YES DNO PAID? YES DNO Page 1 01 2 CASE NUMBER.' 1'2- '1. 4-\£, FEE $300,00 Tn,s appliCation will not be .:hemJed tor public I1Nring un" tie -øpIlc8llon tee IS received, CD-044 (1-94) II !~ d B : I -m ¡ ~ c: . ~ ~~ o ~ ~ ...JII "..w. OIl, 00 JII' .... "w . ... ....'Ool.. 00" o o "1) N (C .þ. I --\. CJ') ~:" :Ia .~ I '," A ' , ~I ! . õ ~ ,,1; ¡ ! 0 Õ n ... ,I. 2. -:Fz ~ ~ : ~ o - II ; ñ . If' f ;- = II o ø. " :- = ~ j ~ ~ '-1 ..., =>: ~ ".; (') ,.; I "'" p..) -. .. ,., =>: '" ~ AI -t n :T :Ia I ..........(,tJ , , I _.-------J ..-~._- ---:- "7 n -_._~ ...JII -"-o¡- -~ ~ I ·----0 - "I ... ..~ f;:J ;,-;,' 'f, (') " p..) n I .... . , -, :Ia I ..., I ~ '''TI ,~ :: 10 ....~ " (. . ( ~J~~:,¡ ~~~ ~~~ ill ~ ~ j : '/.1~ : . . ¡ ." i (.~~'~.: . : " .~., ¡\j.J " ~:'I /l.r1J!' C t', :Ia , . , o ¡ ....'1 '.'......"'j: r ",I .....~. '/;' ! I~ ~ >: (') I .... :Ia I . I o . : ; l.. ~ ¡ .."...... ~ ¡ ¡ -. 1'-: ,', r: ;: " > ': I, ........................ ..,JO................... I (,tJ ..JII ..·..S··..· ~C. , , --------.--___..J~ ·---W·-· -,r---w I I I ...., I I ......1 I· ..,...........,.. ..I~ ." ......t;·.L,,~~··i; '=: ;;¡ n .' ................... ,.., " ~~~ l~~~~ ,~ \~I¡i:¡,~i;i~ü¡ì ;A ;~~ ;j ~ : ''': .: : :: ::: -~~RiJi:\ ~--,- . ¡ ~¡~~¡,~!;¡ ¡ I ~, ; .'J':r~~Er,I..~,J " ..;? ~d¿1j~k:h ~ i~',h~k l! ';'~S. . , ~. ~,/~/=¡~~.;~~~;;.j :Ia , ..., I ~ "TI '", ,;,;.,' ~ . .. .... ".... ~ 11 I 'I.............. ., .. ~ ' ". ~}:~::, .~-~~- ~rl ~;, ç:; 'í-7, I )' .:. 1 î1\\ ~-~ ~ :1 I ""nui !i; ['tel P ti ---;-:-.-r -l f=r~ i - .' ~~ .! "ill r~~J" .~- ~ L=r ; I, ,;,!,;,',:: i- .;:L:_J I i.:.."....~...~....... !' ;..! .. ¡. ! . I J , ,.....,i....."l......í!,L.,:! ,·........../..'..:~.....'.i I,:..... 1 ,',.,;::,... f - ,-.~. i," ,. . 1; "':,',': ,I ¡ '.: : .,.......,..:.:.:.......',¡'.....:,...... . í ,....... .............;........... ../ /., ........,............:.. .~ ,~ .;- ",...,., ',...,:'.....',...".::' ,(:,:.:::::::: ........,....~.',',",~:~ ,;,;·····'·::r~~""·,':···'i:::":'::,:,','··..·',· . ': ........,.,... ;- " , ... . .. ,i I"..·· ....1....·....·....· "-"'J ~JJ:" e-r .- :; .. '-L::": ¡; !.... ',:..,. ............,..... .:..., r I "":!:::::J,,_...,..... =1, 811! "t' ~ ., i.I:··~.-.:~~l' '...,:...:.~.'.:...., '---:---':--¡' ':-- ..-:--;-... ,- ¡ i j ¡ ¡ ., ! ~ !' : . ; . : ; '. !'~ r......·..·.. ........... :.- ..:::,,'_......:,'.'_.......".,'..,...;,.,.;.'·_·..·..·,1-00,,; -;,.:,'Ii--,-= ~¿ hi ~ I _ I ,I --L..--1 I.., -- .\i:l c-A'L)" 'j.' r·T~'l ,~T,,'r~ r~-T~'-ro]-,-1 : Ip :...., .-__..__.1_...._._ _1,.., , ~ ¡ j 1 ~ ; ,. : .: :: ~,' ¡. co , " "1,' I' ;, ""1 I·.., ',t. . '~,t~!I";.. '~.., ¡....~,....il I' ~ .¡. . -- .. ~ (~:;, +; ',' G?-' I' ~.~:¡ .... Ii ..........J : ..j,. ................ ['....'.::·'1/,..::.... !:~: : ;: ~: ~ i: I 'i' I ~¡l (') I .... I'" ¡". I'....' I 'r C'=2I 1557 i .'....~··:..r~·;..'.J :., N I'!- I': ,').:\. 0 II' f) /? / \ '! I . - I. I ··¡-'..,....'1 ...........-¡............ ... ......... .~............ " ';"7 .~). . .....~:.....¡... ....~...... l'r> i :~ ·······......1............. ¡ ;. ··..·····....1............· ...j............ :... ~ ..., , ~ "TI :n 'r .:.... ~ "'j. ", tw, :Ia , ....., " ,:~ ~~ t ~ ' ..l"; , , . , , ~.J :¡ _.- . /~.I /J nj\[~·,\·¡ ¡-; I;~/,,~,.'.," -. / 1,. '.' '. I ' / ,':' ___ I . ''':'' ./. _~ Eo / . i. T."~' 1\ ,. " ... UIC: .... o ..+ i' " , ,:. ¡ ~, :-, ,'": .~ 'jl :: t ¡ ! : I ,,> "" ~ -,/'~~~.. ,~) ',,.,,', ,....~, '''{. :::>1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 9/12/94 Subject: Public Hearin~ to consider the request of Tommv Wright to rezone Agenda Number: Tract 2A3, Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential. (Located in the 7900 block of Green Valley Drive) PZ 94-17 Ordinance No. 2007 Mr. Tommy Wright has a property located in the 7900 block of Green Valley Drive under contract for purchase. The property is located just west of Ember Oaks Drive. The property is currently zoned AG Agriculture. Mr. Wright wishes to develop the property as single family residences, and is seeking a zoning change to R-2 Single Family Residential to allow the development. The property is situated on the north side of Green Valley Drive, between a riding stable and the Ember Oaks subdivision. The Green Valley Raceway lies to the north of the property. The property to the east and north is zoned R-2, to the south R-3, and to the west AG. Mr. Wright is seeking a zoning change to R-2 to subdivide the property into four lots. The R-2 district requires a minimum 9,000 square foot lots and 1,800 square foot houses. The property in question is somewhat odd in shape (see attached zoning exhibit). Mr. Wright has also submitted a Preliminary Plat of the property that is currently under review by staff. The developer is proposing four lots, one of which will eventually be replatted when the property to the north develops. This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan that calls for low density single family development in this area. Staff has not received any correspondence regarding this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its August 25, 1994 meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) g¡:;~ting BUd~~---t g ;¡____, ~ ~ 1(' ~ Department~ad Signature ' ~~anager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of . . - ORDINANCE NO. 2007 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2, SECTION 200, OF ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 22, 1993; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the following recommendation is submitted to the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by rezoning certain property; now therefore BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, on Case Number PZ 94-17, the following property shall be rezoned from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential: BEING a tract of land in the Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract Number 1266, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of a tract of land as described in deed recorded in Volume 4985, Page 887, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING as a 1/2-inch iron pin set for comer in the north right-of-way line of Green Valley Drive, and being located 130.52 feet North 89 degrees 55 minutes 30 seconds West from the southwest comer of Lot 1, Block 1, Ember Oaks Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-213, Page 63, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 89 degrees 55 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of343.73 feet along said right-of-way line to a 1/2-inch iron pin set for comer in the east line of a tract of land as described in deed recorded in Volume 7116, Page 1062, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 00 degrees 05 minutes 21 seconds East a distance of281.93 feet along the east line ofa tract described in deed recorded in Volume 7116, Page 1062, to a 1/2-inch iron pin found for comer, said point being the southwest comer of a tract ofland as described in deed recorded in Volume 6785, Page 871, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 65 degrees 38 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 238.66 feet along the south line of said tract described in deed recorded in Volume 6785, Page 871, and continuing along a tract ofland as described in deed recorded in Volume 5397, Page 677, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, to a 1/2-inch iron pin found for comer; THENCE South 18 degrees 17 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 40 1 .06 feet along said tract described in deed recorded in Volume 5397, Page 677, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, to the point of beginning and containing 2.20 acres ofland, more or less. 2. THAT, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein. 3. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 4. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 25th DAY OF AUGUST, 1994. 1Jvldt;Á Secretary, Planning and Zoning éommission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 12th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1994. Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Ordinance No. 2007 Page 2 . . PZ Minutes· Page 5 August 25, 1994 . Mr. Baxter stated h ants to see development in this area, but the neighborhoods still need to be protecte e stated the residents have very valid concerns. Mr. B n made the motion to deny PZ 94-16. The motion was seconded by Mr. Baxter. otion carried 4-3, with Mr. Bowen, Mr. Baxter, Mr. Davis, and Mr. Lueck voting for 3. PZ 94-17 Public Hearing to consider the request of Tommy Wright to rezone Tract 2A3, Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential. This property is located in the 7900 block of Green Valley Drive. Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to come forward at this time. Mr. Doug Long, 1615 Precinct Line Road, came forward to speak. He stated the tract is currently zoned agriculture and they are requesting R-2 zoning to develop the property. Mr. John Duxbury, 7805 Ember Oaks Drive, came forward to speak. He asked if sidewalks will be built on Green Valley Drive when the property is developed. Mr. LeBaron stated yes, but since it is such a small increment of the road, the Public Works Department may request escrow funds in lieu of construction. He stated it is difficult on a collector street to determine what the final grade of the roadway will be for such a small portion. . Mr. Duxbury stated his concern for children walking to school. Mr. LeBaron stated it is possible to do some temporary asphalt sidewalks. He stated some of the property is not platted and that makes it difficult to place sidewalks because there is no room. There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve PZ 94-17. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen: The motion carried 7-0. STAFF REPORT Mr. LeBaron stated that sometimes the City may install temporary sidewalks in conjunction with the school district. Mr. LeBaron reminded the Commission about the Commissioners workshop Monday night in Hurst. He stated they have several places reserved if anyone would like to attend. CITIZEN CÒMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. . James Brock, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Victor Baxter, Secretary Planning and Zoning Commission Zoning Case Review Fact Sheet Case No. PZ 94-17 Hearing Dates: PZ 8/25/94 CC pending REQUEST: AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential APPLICANT: Tommy Wright, Granbury TX PROPERTY OWNER: Dorothy McClure, Hurst TX SIZE AND LOCATION: Approximately 2.2 acres of land located on the north side of Green Valley Drive, just west of Ember Oaks Drive. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Existing vacant house. Several shrubs and trees. PROPOSED USE: Single family dwellings ALLOWED USE: Single family dwellings ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES North South East West R-2: existing racetrack AG/R-3: existing single family residences R-2: vacant residential property; part of racetrack property AG: existing riding stable DRAINAGE According to Flood Insurance Rate Maps, this property does not lie within a 100-year or 500-year flood plain. THOROUGHFARE PLAN Access to this property is from Green Valley Drive, a C2U Minor Collector on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. A C2U requires 60 feet of right-of-way, and is a 2-lane undivided roadway. LAND USE MASTER PLAN The Comprehensive Land Use Master Plan calls for single family development in this area. This request is consistent with the adopted Plan. ZONING mSTORY This property was initially zoned AG Agriculture when zoning was instituted in North Richland Hills. There have been no other zoning change requests filed for this property. . . . . . Ð. APPLICATION FOR A ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE Please print all responses PART 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPUCANT / AGENT, 7' . R. tA/e--tG. H-r STREET ADDRESS OF APPUCANT: -s 0 'Z- ~ /VI / ^' -S rrE- /2.. ..L) t2. , CITY/STATE/ZIP OFAPPUCANT: 6~/<l;{J P44ftl-f£- 7~!;O PART 2. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION éoõ·z.. -:5~ C!) 0 NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER, A./1"J4 ) H -r ~!æ.D.C'é.. CITY /STATE /ZIP OF PROPERTY OWNER. - 7752 LEGAL DESCRIPTIO OF PROPERTY WHERE ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE IS BEING REOUESTED U. ZA~ ì '5'T~.I..a:...¡ e(C~&)S'D1 ~V~ IJ-IZ-t...k STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION WHERE ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE IS BEING REOUESTED, 71Z5 6e~EN '0 ~ PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST CURRENT ZONING,' REASON FOR CHANGE,' SU ¡VEY o~ :~ TT ACHED AS REOUIRED BY THIS FORM. YES D NO CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 7301 N E LOOP 820 NOATH AICHLAND HI~, TEXAS 76180 817·581,5515 A IT ACH AFFIDA IIII~:: PROPERTY OWNER IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER YES c::J NO I hereby certify that the above information is correct to the best of my knowledge, DATE: ?/21 /11- Your Name (printed) /~ 12, tAl£( ~¡..¡.,,- Signatur PART 4. OFFICE USE ONLY P & Z PUBLIC HEARING DATE' TAXES PAiD? CJ YES CJ NO 26 Nb,I.;J'S( .{ + CITY COUNCIL HEARING DA TE LIENS PAID? CJ YES D NO ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE APROVED ASSESSMENTS PAID' CJ YES DNO c:::J YES c:::J NO OAD, NO, STJPULA TJONS: ZONING DISTRICT CHANGE Page 1 of 2 CASE NUMBER: f2. ~ 4" \1 FEE $300.00 ThIS applicatIon 'MIl nOl be &cheó.Jled lor putJIC heanng unl' fl. appIOCallon lee IS received, CD-044 (1.<;4) .2A211! 100 GR~~NÄ~ON f s 9.407 AC ~ c., TR.2A4 2 Ac ^ IT1 r r IT1 :c I en ~ ~ " H ':: -I :J: "T1 H IT1 r o :c o 73 , 6Rl~L.~~O; 00 49 IIJ 50 tIJ 51 ~ :c H 0 r 00 ITI 2: 0 0 0 ¡; »" i;,; I ., I 56 'I 55' ¡ I 54 53 .. , I O' SRIDLEWOOD DR - 2 . i 3 I ·1' 4 .¡ " 1· "<\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ".oJ ~ TR.2A1 3.69 Ac . 2~.. :1 36 ~ TR.3 2.6 Ac TR.3S1 i 1 Ac 1 TR . 3A TR, 3A 11 ,. .25 Ac 125 ~1 I ' i I 113 -> ~ 35 ~ ~ 34 10 15 N . 9 9 16 8 8 17 7 18 CI: ,W CD 6 19 ~ W 5 20 21 4 22 53c 6 "" 1 :..\. TR,2A "' I 2.78 Ac ITA. 2A 1 ¡ ,4 AC 12 .., WOODS LN ... 33 (4:1 32 ! 31 n -I 30 , ~1~.... , 2g . . . , ~ · :r II: - · .. - " õ C>. " .. = · - ~ - ::---\ -, -- ~i . .... ::: : - : ".....~I......:.. ~-----J : i I · ' . . ' , , , : - ~ ~:.... · "'. .", 'Ò.. ",,'.. · . 1_: ~I : - .---..-------"- :::::: =: ~ '" .-- :;; f) :-; --= ~ _.L-",____ --, -, '"/;':''' ... - .... : '1 · . ...", 101, III~ ... , " ,v", ·N'" '",.~\)' "" / . - ~ ",/ .. ..... '-1" I~', ',',.,>', \<',' =:~'. ", ..}[""'" .::~~,~. '\': . .~:'" ï' '. . ié:. I' _ _ [, N f.'!J. I Ó I :, I - !, ....l~..:, ,~ ....... - : -_: ...", ..., ....1oJ III . ~ AI ., n :r po.) po.) ~ .þ .þ w ." AI .~ (') w N o z - z C) ~ > ." ...", 01, tloJ > C') II ~ ~ .-.....¡ .:- , - L¡: i Imm _ , .. ¡: I..> I j= "16 ....~ :L. " , ¡, " ¡t> L.. ..... ......:~ '~ < " +~ ¡ 'r ñ . . '. C'J - .... .....(:;............... ~~. "" ........~. <? [~.¡]"'~'.:_'~" ............................ :Ia I "'" 1 . : ~/..-. " ......;~.. ............................................ '" j , _ ,ni'/~.'2ï;' j' .! ~:, " .... ~., . ;; . ~,.. ,»11.. . ;; . -, '; I~ I I -. j .,/0 : .~ ..-.......................... "', .,;; :Ñ "".. '....... -",. ~ö: '. '(' I:) ......,.I:~., æ -I' 'i . 'j, . - , ....................... ---_.~.._-. > ~ I ,.;; ')/ I .' 1'% I I I I - j ..... . : ..~' -. ---~-.... c..:. .'. ~:t. -.". ".~ " ......................................... '. ,-, ~.~.\ .~:,.~..:. ~~j:.':~: l' , ., -"' :...... ',;, ( MATC" LINE.. SEE PACE OJ ) ." , "'[Iv' ': . --/'./, \¡ /) ÚI . \ ~. : -:- - ~ ),',! > /~]~ '+. ,.;+. .. " '~'. J/(l, I ·r ""U N c.c .þ.. I ~ ~ ..~.,ç~.... .·~·.·.·.·\~\t .,... II~ ....:' ..~.....~:.'..::.\jg :...~: ...J, ::;; ........... ,I::J : I ,_ --;:0,,- ~ 1 ¡ , ,~',~.] l ...... I I I I), 1- ~.. " ~ ¡ ~! -~ T ¡ t~ INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 94-130 ~ Date: ~ Subject: September 9,1994 PS 94-34 Final Plat of Lot 1, Block H, Calloway Farm Addition The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at its September 8, 1994 meeting and recommended approval of the Final Plat, subject to engineering comments. The motion passed unanimously (4-0). Staff reccomends approval of the plat with the following stipulations regarding this plat: 1. The plat cannot be filed with the County Clerks office until the right-of-way for the future "mall" road has been dedicated and the deed filed. Th~re is a reference on the plat to the filing information of this right-of-way. 2. A building permit for the restaurant can be issued prior to the final construction of the future roadway. However, a final Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the roadway is complete because the road provides the only means of public access to the site. Respecfully submitted, i3 ~ Barry Le~ICP Director of Planning and Inspections ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Plannin~ and Inspections Council Meeting Date: Subject: Request ofG.C. Metroplex for Final Plat of Lot 1, Block H, Calloway Agenda Number: Fann Addition. (Located in the 7700 block of Grapevine Highway) 9/12/94 PS 94-34 G.C. Metroplex is the developer of a parcel of property located on the east side of Grapevine Highway, immediately north of North Hills Mall. The developer has submitted a Final Plat of the property for review by the City Council. The property is the proposed site for a Golden Corral restaurant. The following are the issues regarding this Final Plat: 1. A portion of this property lies within the 100-year flood plain of Calloway Branch. A drainage easement is required for any portion of the flood plain that remains located on this property. 2. A proposed "mall" road, running between Grapevine Highway and Booth Calloway Road, will be constructed in the near future. This road is classified as a C4U roadway on the Master Thoroughfare Plan, but is not named at this time. The Final Plat is configured to provide for this road. 3. This property has frontage on Grapevine Highway and a proposed "mall" road. Sidewalks are required on both frontages. The developer has addressed all engineering comments. The Planning and Zoning Commission will consider this Final Plat at its September 8, 1994 meeting, and the recommendation of the Commission will be sent via fax to the City Council on Friday, September 9, 1994. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~~\LA Departm ~atur. !Ç~(JÊ£~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of e General Information A. Owner B. Developer C. Engineer D. Surveyor E. Acreage F. No. of Lots G. Density H. Zoning I. Prop. Use Water and Sewer e A. Lines B. Fire Coverage Streets and Thoroughfares A. Thor. Plan B. Improvements C. Extensions D. New Streets E. Street Lights F. Access G. Sidewalks H. Screening Walls e I. New Street Names Subdivision Plat Review Fact Sheet Case Number PS 94-34 Primary Properties, St. Louis MO G.C. Metroplex, Southlake TX Heimberger & Associates, Wylie TX Spooner & Associates, Hurst TX 2.2957 acres (100,000 square feet) N/A C-l Commercial Restaurant (Golden Corral) This property is served by a 24" sanitary sewer line and a 12" water line located at the rear of the property . Adequate. This property has frontage on Grapevine Highway and a future "mall" road. Grapevine Highway is classified as a P6D Principal Arterial and the "mall" road is classified as a C4U Major Collector. A portion of a proposed "mall" road will be constructed as a part of this development. None. A new "mall" road will be partially constructed as part of this development. Any required street lights will be installed in accordance with Public Works criteria. Access to this property is from the future "mall" road. Sidewalks are required along Grapevine Highway and the proposed "mall" road. None required. None. e e e Drainage A. Flood Plain B. Improvements C. Easements Comprehensive Land Use Plan A. Consistency B. Special Issues According to Flood Insurance Rate Maps, a portion of this property lies within the lOO-year flood plain. A portion of Calloway Branch will be improved as a part of this development. Any portion of the property that remains in a flood plain must be contained within a drainage easement. A 15-foot easement has been dedicated for this purpose. This request is consistent with the Plan that calls for commercial development in this area. None. e N@R.TH R.ICHLAND HILLS Public Works August 12, 1994 MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: R. Michael Curtis, P.E. Staff Engineer SUBJECT: PS 94-35; CALLOWAY FARM ADDITION; Block H, Lot 1 Final Plat and Construction Plans e I have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on July 19, 1994, and offer the following comments. 1. The state plane coordinates for the property comers are not correct. Both property comers have the same coordinates. 2. A sidewalk and utility easement as defined in the Design Manual will be required at the intersection of the Mall Road and State Highway 26. 3. The plat is bordered by State highway facilities on one side. Before a sidewalk is to be constructed, a TxDOT Sidewalk Permit will be required. The sidewalk permit will need to be submitted to the Public Works Department for approval prior to submitting to TxDOT. 4. The appropriate details for construction need to be included in the construction plans. Note that the details included in the Design Manual do not contain any logos other than that of the City of North Richland Hills. It is therefore recommended that the details be used in their entirety. e 7301 N.E. Loop 820 P.O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills. Texas 76182-0609 USA (817) 581-5521 FAX (817) 656-7503 e . . 5. The volume and page for the Mall Road right-of-way dedication will need to be shown on the final plat. 6. The plat does not show exactly how Lot IR, Block A is affected by the platting of this lot. If Lot lR, Block A is not going to be replatted, additional information will need to be added to this plat showing how much land will be lost. 7. There are comments regarding the engineering and construction plans recorded on a set of blueline construction plans. The plans have been returned to the engineer for revision. The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer of his responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans. The City's eventual approval of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. The marked up bluelines need to be returned with the next submittal. dJf!:L C-t;- C/smm/pwm94103 cc: Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning & Inspection Services SEP 02 '94 11:Ø6AM HELM BERGER ASSOC. P.2/2 · [H] HELMBERGER ASSOOATES CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MAN.a.(;9GNT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINBING September 2, 1994 PN'9412 Mr. J. Clayton Hu.band, MCRP City of North Richland Hills 730l N.E. Loop 820 P.o. Box 820609 North Richland Hills; Texas 76182-0609 Re: Golden Corral Site Calloway Branch Channel/Highway 26 North Richland Hills, Texas Dear Mr. Husband: . We are in receipt of your comments on the proposed Golden Corral at ~oop 820/Grapevìne Highway and will revise the drawings accordingly. It you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, KELMBERGER ASSOCIATES, INC. . ~ . llc\L~ A. Helaberqer, P.E. esident cc: Mr. Rich Wood, G.C. Metroplex, Inc. 19412-) I. 124 HOefleR ROAD. WYLIE. TEXAS 75098 . 2141442-7459 e . . NI~H APPLICATION FOR A FINAL PLAT (PI.... printycu ,_) Proposed Subdivision Name: é~a ¡Iowa hc>L ¡:;/,&z~ Z!cci ;f Current Legal Description: ~~ Name and Adci¿ess of Current Prope'fjWner: / " ß,/¥ta..-r , l/rofer-f-r~ Cor/t?, {; / I 0/7 rJ '"e S-(, s -{ ¿ 0 '-<-;~ /Zt 0 Þ 3/'0 / Name and Address of Previous 9Wner: (If purchased during past twelve months) ??-ley C~1ep /f-s-ÇOC:, {JDr/" P,u¿éi-~ j?~Za:.. /3""', ß/'CKZ-dS:--/ City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 817·581 - 5515 / Phone NO.¿Y - 5')/.2 C r.; /U~.rk AlJ;; 7('D2<? NaG'ë-~";'7 ~ ~ j -<- "'- C-¿tC L-o (;ç~-tlr'1z::. -r; (11t/~c;. ðf '2- 1 A:;=-Sòc, /.: T 0 ~~ tv ~/rc y 7$"""070 Phone No. !?f7<r-2 .,... .5;? r Namef!;dr;s£¿:;~~ /2cr ~/ Phone No. ;¿ rY - <f~2 ' íè£ Type of Development Being Proposed: D SF Residential D Duplex Residential Final Plat Application F98 Calculation: Q MF Residential ~ Commercial/Industrial D Other 1. Application f98: 2. Number of resIdential lots @ $1.50 per lot: 3. Number of non-resIdential acres @ $5.00 per acre: 4, Number of street intersection signs @ $65.00 each: 5. County plat recording fee: Total fee: I hereby ce/tify that I am, or represent, the legal owner of the prope/ty described above and do hereby submit this Final Plat to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration. Date: Applicant's Phone No.: Your name (Printed Name): Signature: Note: Please complete and submit the "Final Plat Document Submittal Checklist" on the reverse side of this form. r~ ~~-~ FINAL PLAT - .~ $120.00 IOed 5B~ ¡e~~ CD - 402 (5 - 94) FINAL PLAT DOCUMENT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS This Checklist describes the minimum documents required for a Final Plat submittal. Specifications for each document are contained In the Subdivision Regulations or in the Design Manual for Public Works I Utilities. Indicate which documents are being submitted with this application on the space provided below. ITEM CHECK IF SUBMITTED 1. Final Plat Application The Final Plat Application is furnished on the reverse side of this form. All Final Plat documents shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator not less than thirty-five days prior to the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission for which approval is being sought. Written authorization from the owner shall be furnished when the applicant is not the owner of record. 2. Final Plat Drawing The applicant shall submit the required number of copies of the Final Plat Drawing. The Final Plat Drawing shall contain, at a minimum, the technical specifications of all plat drawings contained in Section 900 of the Subdivision Regulations and include the additional requirements for Replats, Short Form Plats, Amended Plats, and Final Plat Drawings contained in Section 920, Three signed and sealed mylar film copies of Final Plat shall be submitted. 3. Drainage Study The applicant shall submit a Drainage Study of the subdivision area. The Drainage Study shall conform to the technical specifications contained in the Design Manual for Public Works I Utilities, 4. Engineering I Construction Drawings When the City has determined that public improvements are required, the applicant, or his engineer, shall submit construction plans for all public improvements along with the Final Plat for approval by the City. The Engineering I Construction Drawings shall conform to the requirements of Section 1-01 of the Design Manual for Public Works I Utilities, Note: All requests for a submittal waiver must be written and submitted to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator prior to when the plat Is placed on the agenda for review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Failure by an applicant to provide any required information, or failure to submit a written waiver request, shall constitute grounds for refusal of plat acceptance for further processing or for staff recommendation for plat denial by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Acceptance of the plat for processing does not guarantee approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the City Council. 1- ~I~ - .:::::: ,'-' e I I~ it=: N I U I I ¡q I ................................ ';r' L;~, '~~.;, (.~ .......~ ...~~. I: ~ i=:t-:,j ~:I;' ~ :_..;~-~::::--,~ i'c;j ~1:'10 i"':;':1 ~ I' ,_1__....." . J ~\' 0..... ._.10::1 m.............. -,~¡:- ....:_1 ~1~J~..:lt I.';: 1- ;T'~\ ~--I' ,¡'1 ¿or- _ ì ~!, '. ~ I·;:.' . ·..T..·......'.., f...........:.........¡__. ~ .. 0 ¡................, ~ .. i' ,," ~, \ ·........·....1 ~ ~=:......:;.....j .;~:.,...~.....,.....,>..,: ,.._;_.;_..._'~ ,! ~ ! ¡..,{-.--,! I,,~~,,:,......j '; ~ ~:~. ....:~. c.J .. ~:!;;2~ aN I,{ ¡",If077VJ ! '~~::. ,.-, JI- I <, C.i. 't, ! "~:~,'"~/- ~" , ~ ~ H.LOOEJ ~ ~ ,~~... ""' I )/'...............................__ U ~.., / ';r' ".::, '& ~ .~:; ......... r"\ ,,- ~'.(. / . ~ ./ ~...:) > // ,. ' /" c,. L/j'---.-..... ;' , .........-..... : "" / / /' ''''''''',,,,,, // / '/::':::y . L,-~,' ~ N I U -r, .~.) -.,...... ~~. ." ,,.:. .~;:¿. ~'''f;, :~S. ~..) .~,. . .,.. ;- .':' ',1. ,~ ~ <,......".... W ! .( 37NV~U <2; ""' ' I ,_~/\í , ~~ , ./ .t~ ~~:, ,., -,' 1Þ" 2;',,( t·7.?· ........., "¿. Q '..) ., "1a ~ , , / ( , \ "~-'----"--- ¡ ~-~- t) \...,., I ""-' I I ¡ ! . ~ \\J ... ~ "'--"-'-'-,-",----- 7 \ , / ./ ~\ ;..........1'"" . i r/ "> ,( '""" I . ) ", ,,',..,...._.._..,........~/ 2: ~ ¡-\ +- / ."",, / ., "'-, .,'¿" / o ~ > ~ ~ ~ : I i l -- ! ':: -'-----..--i -~- ~ . ",1. GIll: . " a)~""~.1D r} . ~ ¡......."....... -.c' .'" ¡ '" . ,.., ¡....·..'+t....t......·..:,-¡.....L.... : ",.... : . ,.' : .. ~ ~of ... .. ~~' m N~' ¡VI, 7/)1 /" ¡.,,, )- ....... ...::'~ . " ,/'" ....~: .. : -.... 2) '-''- \", N), i I /: " /\, '\ / ~ -........i r' N ;~:'¡ ...!..~_ .91 I~ III . r ,·,.w......w....... ~ ; , . If" m IL I:" i-:: . i .i ~~ o ~t ':L. \Þ4 '7 /.Í. ~ ~, cø \.:;J. .-~ ::> ~.. I...ï ~ OK - 1 ' ~, : :~ : !,.. 1 ¡ ~¡: I- r..·..·~..·.. III - t...___ i CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Subject: Approval of 1994 Certified Tax Roll - Resolution 94-42 Council Meeting Date:9/12194 Agenda Number: GN 94-106 Tarrant Appraisal District has provided the City with the Certified Tax Roll information. This includes the most current appraisal information; exemptions for disabled veterans, persons over 65, homestead, and disabled persons; abatement value losses, and agricultural value losses. These values also include the new construction and the minimum value still under protest to the Tarrant Appraisal Review Board. The certified values as of September 1 for our City are $1,510,391,128. This is the amount that is recommended to be certified and accepted by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve Resolution 94-42 to approve the Certified Tax Roll in the amount of $1,510,391,128 for 1994. . Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number gf~~~~ ~~ .,,_.o,,~'" ~ . v~LJme~; Head ~t~;e City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Pa e 1 of ..c . . . RESOLUTION NO. 94-42 WHEREAS, the City Council of this City received the Ad Valorem Tax Rolls for the year 1994 from Tarrant Appraisal District in the amount of net taxable value of $ 1,510,391,128 including minimum value of properties pending disposition before the Appraisal Review Board; and WHEREAS, the City Council studied said Tax Rolls and approved same on September 12, 1994. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas that: 1. The approval of said Tax Rolls received from Tarrant Appraisal District in September, 1994, be and is hereby ratified and said Tax Rolls shall collectively be considered the Tax Roll of this City for 1994 and it is hereby in all things adopted and approved. PASSED AND APPROVED the 12th day of September, 1994. Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date:9/12194 Subject: Authorizing Homestead, Over 65, and Disability Exemptions fromAgenda Number: GN 94-107 Ad Valorem Taxes - Ordinance 2009 For the past several years the City Council has been granting several exemptions from Ad Valorem Taxes, and it is necessary for Council to again take action adopting exemptions. The ordinance that is being proposed includes a 15% exemption for resÎdential homestead, a maximum $29,000 exemption from assessed value on a residential homestead for persons over the age of 65, and a $29,000 exemption from assessed value of property owned by a disabled person where that property is exclusively used for homestead purposes. The proposed ordinance does not allow an exemption to be claimed for both the over 65 and the disability, and no homestead will be subject to both the over 65 and disability exemption. These exemptions were anticipated in calculating the net taxable property that is included in the Certified Tax Rolls and calculating the effective tax rate 1994; RECOMMENDA llON: It is recommended that Ordinance 2009 providing for exemptions for homestead, over 65 years of age, and disability persons be approved. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other _ ~~~ure CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , FInance Oor8ctor Page 1 of . ORDINANCE NO. 2009 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. There shall be exempt from the City Ad Valorem Taxes for the year 1994, fifteen percent (15%) (with a minimum of $5,000) of the assessed value of residential homestead within the City which is occupied by the owner as his homestead. 2. . Persons over the age of 65 years, claiming an exemption pursuant to Ordinance No. 676 shall have a $29,000.00 exemption from the assessed value of a residential homestead. A person who is disabled within the meaning of Section 11.13 (m) of the Property Tax Code of the State of Texas, as of January 1st of each year shall be entitled to $29,000.00 exemption from the assessed value of property owned by such disabled persons and used exclusively for homestead purposes by such disabled persons. No person may claim both the "over 65" exemption and the "disability" exemption and no homestead shall be subjected to both the "over 65" exemption and the "disability" exemption. 3. Persons claiming the exemptions must comply with the City Ordinances and Texas Property Tax Code. 4. "Exemptions provided for in section 1 and 2 will remain in force by the City of North Richland Hills unless the City Council of North Richland Hills takes action to change either, or both." . . ORDINANCE NO. 2009 Page Two PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of September, 1994. Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary . APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for City . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Subject: Adopting the Tax Rate for 1994 - Ordinance 2008 Council Meeting Date:9/12194 Agenda Number: ON 94-108 The City Council held a public hearing on the proposed 1994/95 annual operating budget at its August 22 City Council meeting. The proposed 1994/95 budget includes a tax rate of 57¢ which is the current tax for fiscal year 1993/94. The proposed tax rate of 57¢ is broken down into two parts as follows: 29. 1927¢ - for purposes of maintenance and operations 27.8073¢ -- for purposes of payment of interest and principal on long term debt of the City No additional hearing is required for the tax rate for fiscal year 1994/95. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Ordinance 2008 setting the tax rate for the 1994 tax year at 57¢. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Suffi ¡ent Funds Available Operating Budget Other~^l~ - . '-' V~~¡n~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Pa e 1 of . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2008 AN ORDINANCE LEVYING A TAX RATE FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS FOR THE 1994 TAX YEAR BE I T ORDAINED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS THAT: We, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills do hereby levy or adopt the tax rate on $100 valuation for this City for tax year 1994 as follows: $ .291927 for the purposes of maintenance and operation. $ .278073 for the payment of principal and interest on debt of this City. $ .57 total tax rate. The tax assessor-collector is hereby authorized to assess and collect the taxes of the City of North Richland Hills on this 12th day of September, 1994. 1. That there is hereby levied and shall be collected as provided by law, an Ad Valorem tax for the year 1994 on all property, real and personal, except such property as may be exempt from taxation by Constitutions in the statutes of the State of Texas, and ordinances and resolutions of the City of North Richland Hills, situated within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, on January 1, 1994, and that the amount to be applied to the value of such property shall be 57.0¢ per $100 valuation. 2. That the tax so levied and assessed shall be apportioned to the accounts and funds in the amount as set forth above. The amounts collected for payment of principal and interest on debt of the City shall be deposited into an interest and sinking fund for that purpose until a total of $4,200,000 is deposited from the 1994 Ad Valorem tax levy. A two and one-half percent (2~%) uncollectible factor is imputed. . ORDINANCE NO. 2008 Page Two 3. That the taxes provided for herein are in accordance with the appropriate state statues. 4. Ad Valorem taxes levied by this Ordinance shall be due and payable on October 1, 1994, and shall become delinquent on the first day of February, 1995. Payment of such tax is due as provided by the Texas Property Tax Code. 5. If the tax is unpaid after February 1, 1995, such tax will become delinquent and penalty and interest will attach and accrue as provided by the Statutes of the Texas Property Tax Code Sec. 33.01. 6. . In the event the taxes become delinquent and in the event such delinquent taxes are referred to an attorney for collection, an additional amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the total amount of tax, penalty and interest then due shall be added as collection costs to be paid by the taxpayer. 7. Taxes herein levied and uncollected shall be a first prior and superior lien against the property, and the said lien shall be superior liens charges, and encumbrances, and such lien shall attach to personal property with the same priority as to real property. 8. The lien provided herein shall be attached as of January 1, 1995. 9. . Should any section, provision or clause of the Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so declared to be invalid. . ORDINANCE NO. 2008 Page Three 10. The Ordinance shall become effective from and after the date of its approval and adoption as provided by law. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, upon first and final reading, at a regular meeting on the 12th day of September, 1994. Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: . Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for City - Rex McEntire . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Subject: Adopting 1994/95 Budget - Ordinance 2010 Council Meeting Date:9/12194 Agenda Number: GN 94-109 A Public Hearing on the proposed 1994/95 annual operations budget was held August 22, 1994. At the budget hearing the City Council directed the staff to provide funding for the Teen After-School Program estimated at $30,000. It is anticipated that either all or part of this funding can be provided through sponsorships or grants. This $30,000 program has been incorporated into the budget that Council tentatively agreed on, and revenues from these sources were increased to cover this $30,000 program. The other changes in the proposed budget which were approved by City Council at the Budget Retreat in Granbury and also identified in IR 94-115 have also been incorporated into the proposed budget that is for Council consideration. The General Fund budget which is the tax supported budget totals $17,883,825. This represents approximately 6.1% above last year's General Fund budget. The Utility Fund budget is projected for 1994/95 at $17,564,943. The General Debt Service Fund totals $5,326,020, and the fourth largest fund is the Park and Recreation Facilities Development Fund which totals $3,086,981. The proposed budget is based on a 57¢ tax rate which is the existing rate for the fiscal year. Revisions to the 1993194 revenues and expenditures have been made to reflect the most current estimates for this year. Projects such as the electronics ticket test project and recycling roller bins that Council agreed upon at the Budget Retreat have been included for funding in the revised 1993/94 Budget instead of next year's budget. Adoption of the Ordinance 2010 will also cover these revisions. ' RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance 2010 adopting the 1994/95 budget and the revisions to the 1993/94 budget. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~~~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM - Acct. Number Suffic' nt Funds Availab e , FInance Dtrector - City Manager Pa e 1 of . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2010 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95; APPROVING REVISED BUDGET FIGURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94; PROVIDING FOR NECESSARY TRANSFERS OF FUNDS BETWEEN ACCOUNTS AND DEPARTMENTS, IF REQUIRED; APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE 1993/94 FISCAL YEAR FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared certain figures as a 1994/95 budget and has submitted the same to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Manager proposed budget with the City beginning October 1, 1994; and on August 6, Secretary for 1994 the filed fiscal such year WHEREAS, the City Secretary did post notice that such proposed budget has been filed and a public hearing called thereon by the City Council in City Hall; and WHEREAS, the City Council determined such proposed budget be fiscal year 1994/95 to be appropriate and correct in all respects and that all requirements of the law have been satisfied; NOW THEREFORE: BE ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: SECTION 1. THAT the budget proposed by the City Manager for the fiscal year October 1, 1994 through September 30, 1995, BE and the same is hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 2. THAT the figures prepared and submitted by the City Manager for 1994/95 fiscal year BE and the same is hereby approved in all respects. SECTION 3. THAT any necessary transfer of funds between accounts, departments, or programs by the City Manager for City purposes or as a result of unusual or unforeseen conditions during the administration of the 1994/95 fiscal year budget BE and are hereby authorized and approved. SECTION 4. THAT amounts set under the headings "Revised 1993-94" BE and are hereby authorized and approved. . ORDINANCE NO. 2010 Page 2 SECTION 5. THAT the several amounts, as set forth in the proposed 1994/95 fiscal year budget BE and are hereby authorized to the objects and purposes named, subject to notification in accordance with SECTION 3 hereof if necessary. SECTION 6. THAT a copy of the 1994/95 fiscal year budget will be filed with the appropriate officials as required by law. SECTION 7. THAT any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word be declared unconstitutional and invalid for any reason, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. PASSED by the City Council on the first reading this 12th day of September, 1994 . Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: . Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City < ... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Parks and Recreation Department 9/12/94 Department: Council Meeting Date: -- bo t Authorization to Solicit Bids for Phase I of the Tennis Center and Practice Fields Project GN 911_11 0 ~u Jec : Agenda Number: "t Attached is the site plan for the Tennis Center and Practice Fields project located at Richland High School and on the 33 acre tract on the east side of Holiday Lane. In an effort to maintain project timelines required by BISD, in order to relocate the High School baseball field prior to the upcoming baseball season, Phase I of the project is being bid now. Design work for the tennis center and the remainder of the practice fields is ongoing. Phase I improvements include the final grading for the school baseball field, one football/band practice field, and general site grading for the area east of Holiday Lane and west of the Calloway Branch drainage channel. Construction plans and specifications are complete for Phase I of the project, as shown on the attached plan. Funding is available from the currently approved Parks and Recreation Sales Tax Capital Improvement Program. RECOMMENDATION . It is recommended that Council authorize staff to solicit bids for construction of Phase I of the Tennis Center and Practice Fields project. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) . Operating Budget Other \~~~ "'I Department Head Signature - Finance Review Acct. Number Suf icient Funds Available tJJ- , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of . .. ~ ':. . . Æ:'I § :~i ~ II: I I ~' , . - D ell i i ~ ~I; .' '< . ~ b: QI I H to - § ~ ' ~' 8 ¡! ~ ! e a . I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Parks and Recreation Department 9/12/94 Department: Council Meeting Date: - ubject: Approving the ISTEA Enhancement Grant Agreement with TxDOT for the North Electric Trail Project. - R I· #' Agenda Number: GN 94-11 eso utlOn 94-43 The City of North Richland Hills has been awarded a $585,000 grant for development of the North Electric Trail, along the TU Easement between Richland High School and the Family Aquatic Park. The City's share is $165,000. The Texas Department of Transportation will administer the grant application in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Grant Agreement. Upon adoption of the resolution approving the agreement, TxDOT requires 10% of the city's share, $16,500, to be deposited in an escrow account in order to begin work on the project. Once the Grant Agreement is executed I a consultant will be selected in accordance with TxDOT policies and guidelines. Upon completion of the plans and specifications, the remainder of the City's share, $148,500, will be required by TxDOT. TxDOT will then bid the project and administer the construction contract. RECOMMENDA TION It is recommended that Council adopt the Resolution No. 94-43 authorizing the execution of the Grant Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation for the North Electric Trail project. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) . Operating Budget Other _ ~ ~' ~.c::w . -..Y-- Department Head Signature - Finance Review Acct. Number Suffi ¡ent Funds Available . Finance Director - uJ~ - City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of . . :\oj . RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF THE ISTEA ENHANCEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE NORTH ELECTRIC TRAIL PROJECT; AND APPROVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Wide Trail Plan identifies the North Electric Trail as a significant regional transportation enhancement project for pedestrians and bicyclists; and WHEREAS, the City applied for and has been awarded statewide transportation enhancement program grant funds for development of the North Electric Trail; and WHEREAS, the City Council has designated funding for the City's share of the North Electric Trail project; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs its City Manager to execute the ISTEA Enhancement Grant Agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation for the North Electric Trail project. SECTION II. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of August 1994. Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary BY: Approved as to legal form: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City BY: DRAFT . Agreement No. Tarrant County CSJ: 0902-48-211 City: North Richland Hills Project: North Electric Multi-Use Trail and Landscaping STATE OF TEXAS * COUNTY OF TRAVIS * AGREEMENT (STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM) THIS AGREEMENT, is made by and between the State of Texas, acting by and through the Texas Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the "State" and the North Central Texas Council of Governments, a Metropolitan Planning Organization, acting by and through the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, hereinafter called the "City". WIT N E SSE T H WHEREAS, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, ("ISTEA") 4IÞ codified under Title 23 U.S.C. Section 101 et seq., establishes the National Intermodal Transportation System that is economically efficient and environmentally sound, provides the foundation for the nation to compete in the global economy, and will move people and goods in an energy efficient manner; and WHEREAS, Title 23 U.S.C. Section 133 establishes a statewide transportation enhancement program ("STEP") to contribute to the attainment of a national ambient air quality standard to be implemented by the States' ~ransportation Agencies; and WHEREAS, Title 23 U.S.C. Section 134 establishes that Metropolitan Planning Organizations ( "MPO' s") and the States' Transportation Agencies to develop transportation plans and programs for urbanized areas of the State; and WHEREAS, the State and the City desire the improvements to the 2.9 mile Bike Trail, connecting Richland High School on the west to the Aquatics Center on the east, as shown in the attached "Exhibit A", to be hereinafter identified as the "Project"; and . 08/23/94 TYPE "K" Page 1 of 10 4-' \ ,,\ t::; ç(1~"t' WHEREAS, Title 23 U.S.C. Section 120 establishes that the Federal share of funding for STEP will not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the cost of the Project; and WHEREAS, the City has offered to participate in the development and construction of the Projects by providing funding, preparing the design documentation, acquiring the necessary right-of-way, accomplishing utility adjustments and other necessary items required by the State; and WHEREAS, on the _ day of , 19_, the City Council passed Resolution No. attached hereto and identified as "Exhibit B", authorizing the City's participation in the development of the Project; and WHEREAS, the State will secure the federal cost share, let the construction contract, provide the construction inspection, provide other items as required; and WHEREAS, on the 30th day of June, 1994, the Texas Transportation Commission passed Minute Order 103928, attached hereto and identified as "Exhibit C", authorizing the Project through the State Transportation Improvement Program; AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements of the parties hereto, to be by them respectively kept and performed as hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as follows: 1. CONTRACT PERIOD This agreement becomes effective upon final execution by the State and shall terminate upon completion of the Project or unless terminated òr modified as hereinafter provided. 2. SCOPE OF PROJECT A. The State and the City agree that the scope of the Project shall be limited to the scope authorized by the Texas Transportation Commission. B. The City will continue to provide maintenance for all city roads and/or trails within the limits of the Project until the State's award of the construction contract. 3. ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY 08/23/94 TYPE "K" Page 2 of 10 · · · The City shall perform necessary requirements to provide the desired right-of-way required for the construction of the Project. The City will comply with and assume the costs for compliance with all the requirements of Title II and Title III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Title 42 U.S.C.A. Section 4601, et seq., including those provisions relating to incidental expenses incurred by the property owners. Documentation to support such compliance must be maintained and must be made available to the State and its representatives for review and inspection. 4. RIGHT-OF-WAY DESCRIPTION The City shall prepare right-of-way maps, property descriptions and other data as needed to properly describe the right-of-way which the City is to acquire and provide for the project. The right-of-way maps and property descriptions shall be submitted to the State for approval prior to the City acquiring the necessary right-of-way. Tracings of the maps shall be retained by the City for its permanent records. 5. UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS/RELOCATIONS If the required right-of-way encroaches upon existing utilities and the proposed highway construction requires the adjustment, removal or relocation of such utility facilities, the City and its consultant will establish the necessary utility work and notify the appropriate utility company, to schedule their adjustments. The City shall be responsible for all costs associated with the adjustment, removal or relocation of such utility facilities, and such adjustment, removal or relocation shall be in accordance with applicable State law, regulations, policies and procedures. In the event additional utilities are required to be adjusted, removed or relocated during the construction of the Project, the City will be responsible for all costs associated with the additional utility work. 6. CERTIFICATION The City shall provide to the State forty-five (45) days prior to the construction contract let date, a certification that all right-of-way has been acquired, all environmental problems have been remediated, and all conflicting 08/23/94 TYPE "K" Page 3 of 10 utilities have been adjusted to clear the proposed construction. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION A. The City will be responsible for the mitigation and remediation of any environmental problems associated with the development and construction of the Projects. The City shall provide to the State written certification from the appropriate regulatory agency (s) that the environmental problems have been remedied. The State will not let the construction contracts until all environmental problems have been remediated by the City. B. All costs associated with the remediation of the environmental problems shall be the responsibility of the City and/or the property owners. These costs will not be reimbursed or credited towards the City's financial share of the Project. 8. ENGINEERING SERVICES A. The City will prepare or cause to be prepared the preliminary engineering necessary for the development of plans, specifications and estimates (P.S.& E) . Development of the preliminary engineering shall include environmental assessment and holding of a public meeting and/or public hearing. B. The P.S.& E. shall be developed by the City or its consultant in accordance with the State's latest Standard Specifications For Construction Of Hiqhways, Streets And Bridqes and AASHTO Guide for Development of Bicycle Facilities or its currently approved revisions. C. The City shall submit the completed P.S.& E. to the State for review and approval. Should the State determine that revisions are required to the P. S. & E. , . the City shall make the necessary revisions. The State will not let the construction contract until the P.S.& E. have been approved by the State. D. The City will submit to the State all documentation relating to actual costs incurred associated with the development of the preliminary engineering and the P.S.& E. Reasonable costs incurred by the City after the City receives written authorization by the State to proceed with P. S. & E. development will be eligible for reimbursement at an amount not to exceed seventy-eight percent (78%) of the actual cost. 08/23/94 TYPE "K" Page 4 of 10 · · · 9. PROJECT FUNDING A. The total J!':Ì:gflt-eF "''''y, P. S. & E., and construction cost is estimated at $750,000.00. B. The State will be responsible to secure the federal share of the funding required for the development and construction of the Project. The City will be responsible for any non-federal participation costs associated with the Project. C. Upon execution of this agreement, the City will remit a check or warrant made payable to the -Texas Department of Transportation" in the amount of $16,500.00. This amount is based on twenty-two percent (22%) of the estimated engineering costs and State administrative cost. The funds will be utilized by the State to ,review the engineering documentation, perform administrative task - as defined herein and other incidental costs. D. Sixty (60) days prior to the ate set for receipt of the construction bids, the State will notify the City that its financial share for the construction is required. The City shall remit a check or warrant in the amount established by the State wi thin thirty (30) days from receipt of the State's written notification to the address provided herein. E. In the event the State determines that additional funding is required by the City at any time during the development of the Project, the State will notify the City in writing of the additional amount. The City will make payment to the State within thirty (30) days from receipt of the State's notification. Upon completion of the Project, the State will perform an audit of the costs and any funds due the City will be promptly returned. 10. INDIRECT COST RECOVERY PLAN Chapter 2106, Texas Government Code, requires the State to recover indirect costs based on a percentage of the State's actual direct costs to complete the Project. The indirect costs will be in accordance with the State's Indirect Cost Recovery Plan and will be based on the City's funding percentage provided herein. 11. CONSTRUCTION RESPONSIBILITIES A. The State shall advertise for construction bids, issue bid proposals, receive and tabulate the bids and award a contract for construction of the Project in accordance with existing procedures and applicable laws. Any field changes, 08/23/94 TYPE "K" Page 5 of 10 supplemental agreements or additional work orders which may become necessary subsequent to the award of the construction contract shall be the responsibility of the City and subject to the åpproval of the State. B. The State will supervise and inspect all work performed by the construction contractor and will provide such engineering, inspection and testing services as may be required to ensure that the construction of the Project is accomplished in accordance with the approved P.S.& E. C. Upon completion of the Project, the State will issue to the City a "Notification of Completion", acknowledging that the Project has been completed. 12. MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES Upon completion of the Project, the City will assume responsibility for maintenance of the completed facility. 13. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS Upon completion or termination of this agreement, all documents prepared by the City shall remain the property of the City. All documents prepared by the State shall remain the property of the State. All data prepared under this agreement shall be made available to the State without restriction or limitation on their further use. 14. TERMINATION A. This agreement may be terminated by any of the following conditions: (1) By mutual written agreement and consent of both parties. (2) By either party, upon the failure of the other party to fulfill the obligation as set forth herein. B. The termination of this agreement shall extinguish all rights, duties, obligations and liabilities of the State and City under this agreement. If the potential termination of this agreement is due to the failure of the City to fulfill its contractual obligations as set forth herein, the State will notify the City that possible breach of contract has occurred. The City should make every effort to remedy the breach as outlined by the State within a period mutually agreed upon by both parties. C. Violation or breach of contract terms shall be grounds for termination of the 08/23/94 TYPE "K" Page 6 of 10 · · · agreement, and any increase costs arising from the defaulting party, breach of contract or violation of agreement terms shall be paid by the defaulting party. 15. REMEDIES This agreement shall not be considered as specifying the exclusive remedy for any agreement default, but all remedies existing at law and in equity may be availed of by either party to this agreement and shall be cumulative. 16. INDEMNIFICATION To the extent permitted by law, the City shall indemnify and save harmless the State, its officers, employees, agents and contractors from all claims and liabilities due to the activities of the City, its officers, employees, agents and contractors performed under this agreement and which result from an error, omission or negligent acts of the City, its officers, employees, agents or contractors. Additionally, to the extent permitted by law, the City shall save harmless the State, its officers, employees, agents and contractors from any and all expenses, including attorneys fees and court costs which may be incurred by the State in litigation or otherwise resisting said claim or liabilities which might be imposed on the State as the result of such activities by the City, its officers, employees, agents or contractors. 17. AMENDMENTS Any changes in the time frame, character, agreement provisions or obligations of the parties hereto shall be enacted by written amendment executed by both the City and the State. 18. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The City shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, and the orders and decrees of any courts or administrative bodies or tribunals in any manner affecting the performance of the agreement. When required, the City shall furnish the State with satisfactory proof of the compliance therewith. 19. LEGAL CONSTRUCTION In case one or more of the provisions contained in this agreement shall for any reason be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, 08/23/94 TYPE "K" Page 7 of 10 illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions hereof and this agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. 18. NOTICES All notices to either party by the other required under this agreement shall be delivered personally or sent by certified or U.S. mail, postage prepaid, addressed to such party at the following respective addresses: State: Texas Department of Transportation 2501 Southwest Parkway P.O. Box 6868 Fort Worth, TX 76115-0868 City: The City of North Richland Hills, Texas P. O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182 All notices shall be deemed given on the date so delivered or so deposited in the mail, unless otherwise provided herein. Either party hereto may change the above address by sending written notice of such change to the other in the manner provided herein. 19. SOLE AGREEMENT This agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement between the 'parties hereto and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements respecting the within subject matter. 20. INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS The State will, for purpose of termination of the agreement prior to completion, examine the books and records of the City for the purpose of checking the amount of the work performed by the City at the time of contract termination. The City shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records and other documentation relating to costs incurred under this agreement and shall make such 08/23/94 TYPE ilK" Page 8 of 10 · · · materials available to the State, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or their duly authorized representatives for review and inspection at its office during the contract period and for three (3) years from the date of completion of work defined under this contract or until impending litigation is resolved. Additionally, the State, FHWA and their duly authorized representatives shall have access to all records of the City which are directly applicable to this agreement for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts and transcriptions. 21. OMB AUDIT REQUIREMENTS The City shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in paragraphs 6, 8 and 9 of OMB Circular No. A-128. 22. PROCUREMENT AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT STANDARDS The City shall adhere to the procurement standards established in Title 49 CFR Part 18.32 and the property management standards established in Title 49 CFR Part 18.36. 23. CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLIANCE The City shall comply with the regulations of the Department of Transportation as they relate to nondiscrimination (49 CFR 21 and 23 CFR 710.405 (B»; also Executive Order 11246 titled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375 and as supplemented in the Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR 60). 24. MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS The City shall comply with the "Minority Business Enterprise Program Requirements· established in 49 CFR Part 23, Subpart D. 25. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATIONS The City is prohibited from making any award at any tier to any party which is debarred or suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension. The City shall require any party to a subcontract or purchase order awarded under this contract as specified in Title 49 of the Code of Federal 08/23/94 TYPE "K" Page 9 of 10 Regulation, Part 29 (Debarment and Suspension) to certify its eligibility to receive federal funds and, when requested by the State, to furnish a copy of the certification. IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in duplicate counterparts. THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS By: Typed Name Title Date ATTEST: City Secretary THE STATE OF TEXAS Executed for the Executive Director and approved by the Texas Transportation Commission under the authority of Minute Order No. 100002 and Administrative Circular 26-93, for the purpose and effect of activating and carrying out the orders, established policies or work programs heretofore approved by the Texas Transportation Commission. By: Robert Cuellar, P.E. Typed Name Deputy Executive Director of Transportation Planninq and Development Title Date 08/23/94 TYPE "K" Page 10 of 10 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections - Council Meeting Date: 9/12/94 Subject: Consideration of an amendment to the Building Code regarding foundation elevations. Agenda Number: GN 94-11:: Ordinance No. 2013 Attached is proposed Ordinance Number 2013 which will amend the Building Code to include a requirement that the fmished floor elevation of a penn anent building be set at least twelve inches above the top of the curb at the center of the lot. The Building Inspection Department has been using this procedure for a number of years, but the requirement is contained within the text of the Public Works Design Manual rather than the Building Code. Approval of Ordinance Number 2013 will place this requirement in its proper location. RECOMMENDA nON: It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 2013. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ # Head Si~' K:1:~~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of . . . ORDINANCE NO. 2013 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1813, THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BUILDING CODE, AS AMENDED, TO REQUIRE A MINIMUM ELEVATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING FOUNDA TIONS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLA USE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DA TE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: I. THAT, Ordinance 1813, as amended, is hereby amended to insert the following as Section 28: Section 28. Finished Floor Elevation The tìnished Hoor elevation of a pelmanent building shall be set a minim urn of one (1') foot above the top of the curb at the centerline of the lot. If this is not feasible, then a drainage plan signed by a professional engineer, registered in the State of Texas, shall be submitted by the applicant requesting approval of the Building Official and the Public Works Director. However, no tìnished t100r elevation of a pennanent building shall be set less than one and one-half (1.5') feet above the one hundred (100) year frequency storm water sUlface elevation, or the minimum elevation required by the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. II. THA T, the remaining sections of Ordinance 1813, as amended, be renumbered consecutively. III. SEVERA BTLITY CLA USE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. IV. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. PASSED, AND APPROVED this 12th day of September, 1994 APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Plannin~ and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 9/12/94 Subject: Consideration of an amendment to the Building Code regarding foundation elevations. Agenda Number: GN 94-11L Ordinance No. 2013 Attached is proposed Ordinance Number 2013 which will amend the Building Code to include a requirement that the fmished floor elevation of a permanent building be set at least twelve inches above the top of the curb at the center of the lot. The Building Inspection Department has been using this procedure for a number of years, but the requirement is contained within the text of the Public Works Design Manual rather than the Building Code. Approval of Ordinance Number 2013 will place this requirement in its proper location. RECOMMENDA nON: It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 2013. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ ¡) Head Si~ j ~1;i:;:-e CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Duector Page 1 of · · · ORDINANCE NO. 2013 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1813, THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BUILDING CODE, AS AMENDED, TO REQUIRE A MINIMUM ELEVATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING FOUNDA TIONS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLA USE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DA TE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: I. THA T, Ordinance 1813, as amended, is hereby amended to insert the following as Section 28: Section 28. Finished Floor Elevation The tinished noor elevation of a pelmanent building shall be set a minimum of one (l') foot above the top of the curb at the centerline of the lot. If this is not feasible, then a drainage plan signed by a professional engineer, registered in the State of Texas, shall be submitted by the applicant requesting approval of the Building Oftìcial and the Public Works Director. However, no tinished noor elevation of a permanent building shall be set less than one and one-half (1.5') feet above the one hundred (100) year frequency storm water smface elevation, or the minimum elevation required by the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. II. THA T, the remaining sections of Ordinance 1813, as amended, be renumbered consecutively. III. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Inspections Council Meeting Date: 9/12/94 Subject: Consider:!tion of an amendment to the Building Code regarding grading and excavation permits. Agenda Number: GN 94-113 Ordinance No. 2011 Attached is proposed Ordinance Number 2011 which will amend the Building Code to require a Grading and Excavation Permit whenever the elevation of a lot is increased or decreased by six inches or more. Frequently, Building Inspection Department staff notice truck loads of dirt being dumped on vacant lots or tracts of land in the city. These lots become future building pad sites with the potential for serious structural or foundation problems due to inadequate soil compacting. This past summer, for example, the Building Official was involved in a legal dispute between a property owner and a builder over a lot which may have been filled without proper compaction. The Building Code authorizes the Building Official to require soil testing when the stability of the soil is in question. However, it is impractical and expensive to require soil testing for every new building permit request. If soil testing proved that a "filled" site was inadequate, it would place a tremendous burden on the developer to remove the soil and recompact it according to the standards in the Building Code. In the absence of a grading and excavation permit, there is no way to maintain an accurate record of which lots have been filled. Approval of the ordinance will prohibit the "filling in" of a building pad site or a potential flood prone area without proper design criteria. The Grading and Excavation Permit Fee will be established at $15.00 per residential lot or $25.00 per acre for larger tracts. RECOMMENDA nON: It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 2011. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other 'J~: I. g ~",r~- aJ--=~ltÁ /~ Depar~nt Head Signature f City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM -..:J Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of e e e ORDINANCE NO. 2011 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1813, THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BUILDING CODE, AS AMENDED, TO REQUIRE A GRADING AND EXCA V A TION PERMIT; ESTABLISHING A PERMIT FEE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: I. THA T, Ordinance 1813, as amended, Section 21, AmendmcnL'> to the Uniform Building Code, is hereby amended to insert subsection 17 as follows: 17. Section 7003. (a) Pelmits Required. shall be amended to read as follows: Section 7003.(a) Grading and Excavation Permit Requircd. Except where work is exempted in Subsection 7003.(b) of the Uniform Building Code, no person shall increase or decrease the elevation of a lot, tract, or parcel of land by six (6") inches, or more, from the OIiginal elevation, on an area of one thousand (1,000) square feet, or more, unless a Grading and Excavation Permit has been obtained from the Building OfficiaL For purpose of this regulation, the original elevation shall be considered the elevation which existed five (5) years prior to the application date of the Grading and Excavation Permit A Grading and Excavation Permit shall comply with the following: 1. When the area proposed to be cut or filled is located within the limits of the 100 year t100d area, approval of a Development Pc¡mit shall be required as a condition to the approval of the Grading and Excavation Pe¡mit. 2. When the area proposed to be cut or tilled is a potential future site for a permanent structure, the compaction requirements contained in the applicable sections of the Uniform Building Code shall be required as a condition to the approval of the Grading and Excavation Permit II. THAT, Ordinance 1813, as amended, Table 3, Permit Fees, shall be amended to include the following: Grading and Excavation Permit Single Residential Lot or Less than 1 acre Per Acre Fee: $15.00 Fee: $25.00 e e e III. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any COUlt of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. IV. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. PASSED, AND APPROVED this 12th day of September, 1994 APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Plannin~ and Inspections _ Council Meeting Date: 9/12/94 Agenda Number: GN 94-114 Subject: Consideration of an amendment to the Building Code regarding code requirements for relocated buildings. ' Ordinance No. 2012 Attached is proposed Ordinance Number 2012 which will amend the Building Code to require any building moved into or within the city to comply with the building code requirements of new structures. Whenever existing homes are moved within or into the city, they are often "grandfathered" in terms of their building, electrical and plumbing systems. Approval of Ordinance 2012 will correct this potential loophole in the Building Code. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 2012. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ..".,~U~ Departm Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM - Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available {jE 7 .( 11/1 -,Þ . I . /1 cT- /t"'-'-L City Manager , Finance Director Page 1 of · ORDINANCE NO. 2012 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1813, THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BUILDING CODE, AS AMENDED, TO REQUIRE ANY BUILDING MOVED INTO OR WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS TO COMPL Y WITH THE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW BUILDINGS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DA TE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: I. · THAT, Ordinance 1813, as amended, Section 21.1, Amendments to the Uniform Building Code, is hereby amended to insert subsection 4 as follows: 4. No building or structure shall be moved into or within the city limits of the City of North Richland Hills unless a pelmit has been obtained from the Building Official. Every building or structure moved into or within the city limits of North Richland Hills shall comply with the requirement'ì in the Building Code for new buildings or structures. II. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections or this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted hy the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. · CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Departme~: Economic Development Resolution to Extend Review Su~ect: of Cable Service Rates - Resolution No. 94-44 Council Meeting Date: 9/12/94 Agenda Number: GN 94-115 On August 15, 1994, Sammons Cable Services submitted two Federal Communications Commission (FCC) forms to the City which establish a proposed schedule of cable rates for basic service tier and associated equipment. It will take at least ninety days for the City and RW. Beck & Associates (the consultants representing the eleven- City Tarrant Cable Coalition) to determine whether the submitted rates follow the reasonable standards set by the FCC. Likewise, the City needs to formally request that Sammons Cable Services provide some additional data to help us evaluate the rates as prescribed by the FCC. By law, the City may request a 90-day "toll" or extension of the time allowed for review and approval or disapproval of Sammons proposed rates. Recommendation: Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution 94-44, which formally enacts the extension and requests the needed data from Sammons. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ture CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM RV~ . City Manager FlnMce Director Page 1 of · - - RESOLUTION NO. g4-44 WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills is certified to regulate basic cable service rates pursuant to the 1992 Cable Act and FCC rules~ and WHEREAS, on August 15, 1994 Sammons Cable Services submitted to the City of North Richland Hills FCC Forms 1200 (Setting Maximum Initial Permitted Rated for Regulated Cable Services), 1205 (Determining Regulated Equipment and Installation Costs) and 1215 (A La Carte Channel Offerings), all of which set forth a proposed schedule of cable rates for the basic service tier and associated equipment; and WHEREAS, it will take at least ninety (90) days for the City to determine whether the rates submitted follow the reasonable rate standards set by the FCC. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. That the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills hereby orders that the time prescribed for either approval or disapproval of the schedule to basic cable service rates proposed by Sammons be tolled for 90 days which will expire December 13, 1994, pending a timely review of all documentation supporting those rates~ and 2. That the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills hereby directs and orders Sammons Cable Service to provide supplemental data necessary to determine whether the proposed rates are reasonable as prescribed by the FCC~ and 3. That the City Secretary of the City of North Richland Hills is hereby directed to mail a copy of this Resolution by first class mail to Sammons Cable Services and R.W. Beck, Consultant for the City of North Richland Hills. e e e PASSED AND APPROVED this _ day of September, 1994. APPROVED: Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: MIS/Manaaaœnt Services Subject. Canpliance of Household Hazardous Waste . Inter-local Aqreement Resolut~on NO. ~£I-'lb 9-12-94 Council Meeting Date: GN 94-116 Agenda Number: On August 22, 1994 City Council approved participation in the regional household hazardous waste collection event, and authorized City staff to enter into the required inter-local agreement (GN 94- 104). As stated in the inter-local agreement the City of North Richland Hills will participate at the satellite collection site to be located at Tarrant County Junior College Northeast Campus. The inter-local agreement requires each city to pass a resolution indemnifying all participating cities from future liability. Resolution No. 94-46 which states this indemnification, must be submitted along with the inter-local agreement. The City Attorney has approved this resolution. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolut~on 94-46. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) operatlng~ Other 'IIP Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~/ ;?Jt~~ City Manager . Finance Director Pa e 1 of 1 .... · · · RESOLUTION NO. 94-46 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS THAT: 1. The City of North Richland Hills desires opportunity for its citizens to participate hazardous waste collection event, partially funded Texas, and sponsored by the City of Fort Worth. to provide an in a household by the State of 2. The City of Fort Worth will allow participation only if indemnification is provided by participating cities. 3. The City of North Richland Hills does hereby agree to release, indemnify, reimburse, and hold harmless, the participating cities, their officers, agents, and employees, as set forth in the Interlocal Agreement for Household Hazardous Waste Collection. During each year while there is any liability by reason of said contract, including the calendar year 1994, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills shall compute and ascertain the rate and amount of ad valorem tax, based on the latest approved tax rolls, with full allowances being made for tax delinquencies and costs of tax collection, which will be sufficient to raise and produce the money required to pay any sums which mayor become due during any such year, in no instance to be less than two percent (2%) of such obligation, together with all interest thereon, because of the obligation assumed. Said rate and amount of ad valorem tax is hereby ordered to be levied and is hereby levied against all taxable property in the City for each year while any liabili ty exists by reason of the obligation undertaken by the contract, and said ad valorem tax shall be assessed and collected each year until all of the obligations herein incurred shall have been discharged and all liability hereunder discharged. .. · · · Passed and approved this APPROVED: ATTEST: day of , 1994. Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City ... ... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Departme~: Parks and Recreation Department Award of Bid for Family Aquatic Park Su~ect Phase 2 Council Meeting Date: 9/12/94 Agenda Number: GN 94-117 Formal bids were solicited for construction of the Family Aquatic Park. Two bids were received as follows: Craig, Sheffield, and Austin Inc. Roxco, Limited $6,903,000 $7,138,000 The available funding within the currently approved CIP is $4.7 million. After discussions with our consultant and the contractors who submitted bids, it was determined that the high bids received are due to several factors, including current construction market conditions. Other reasons could be increased construction costs (up approximately 20%) due to natural disasters, increased profit margins (up 15-20%) due to the saturated bid market, and the unique nature of this type of project with a high percentage of speciality items. The compressed construction schedule required for a May, 1995 opening, and the size of the project (precluding small contractors who were unable to obtain the bonding required) are additional contributing factors. The consultant believes the low bid is a responsible and competitive bid. The consultant is evaluating the low bid for errors, omissions or potential cost savings. A change order eliminating the wave pool to bring the project closer to budget is being examined. Final figures will be available Monday night. The attendance and revenue projections from the original Enterprise Plan were based on the assumption that the wave pool would be added two years after initial development of the facility. At the time the Enterprise Plan was adopted by Council, the wave pool was advanced into the first phase of development. The construction budget was not significantly increased at the time because preliminary cost estimates from the consultant incorrectly showed that we would be able to include the wave pool within the proposed budget. Finance Review 4~· -~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Anance Director Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Page 1 of 2- . . Page Two Some of the alternative approaches to the cost overrun problem are as follows: 1) Reject all bids and readvertise. 2) Defer construction of the wave pool feature, which will offset most of the excess over budget. 3) Advance the date of the next bond sale from its tentative time of 1996 to the spring of 1995, and increase its amount by $500,000. Higher than budgeted sales tax collections make it possible to fund this project in its entirety, if the Council so desires, as outlined in Alternative No.3, above. Staff believes it would be desirable to proceed with the project, and will present a report with final figures at the Council Meeting. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider the alternatives regarding construction of the family aquatic park. . . f- W ø Q ::J ro f- :z w ;:: Il. o ...! W Êij o >- f- ::¡ ~ u. w ~ ~ Il. M f- ro :ï: x w 00 00 00 ~ œ œ .... I ¡ID ;:¡ œ .... M.... <om M"<t t:?ø NM 00.... ~ø:r E#J- W ::J Z W > w ex: o oð ;:: oð W f- W o (.) 00 o o ~ ..- E#J- e '<t <0 '<t W .". to ~ œ 00 "<t t:? M E#J- to ..... M ø C') "<t E#J- ~ <0 Ñ o 00 E#J- "<t C') .... ~ to E#J- . œ 00 to. .". ..... o .,f E#J- 0 0 0 ci 0 .... M .æ E#J- c J II) (.) fIJ ... "0 "¡: ~ ro c {!2 oS ¡ ~ IJ. g ttI is m e e I 0> <:::> I <::> 8 <::>. <::> Ô ;; ~ 'II: ~ 10 8 0 ; 10 Ô Ô 0 .... "" ... .... g 8 ã ; C: ¡r¡ Ô i.!:> .... N ... .... .... ... ¡.... ~ ã 10 0 8 :::¡ ; en <::> ¡ ~ "'" .... 0 m ¡.... z W <;> 10 0 :¡¡ m 0 8 11. I 0 C: 9 0 0 i ~ ;; iN: W ~ . 0 ~ g <;>m <::> 0 ~ ã I '" ::::¡ ~~ ~ <::> ~ 5i I q 0 t.C> ot.C> ¡r¡ <rÌ <Xi il:I í:!I ~ w.. ... .. ... .... œ ,e; ... fA- "'" "". 10 Z .,. .... m ~ g .,. !;( ~ 8 8 ~ r:a I C: C: il:I a;: 0 ¡r¡ æ 0 <::> ~ ;; .... <::> ..... ItS ~ ... ~ ~, "" ~. i 8 I. 8 ~ a.. ~ ¡¡¡. <iI!; .... 0 <::> ~ ! t.C> ø:i re !1\1 g ~ ... fA- ~ ø ... ..... ~ .... '<f .... ó :J;;! m a;: g ¡:! î <= ffi <= <0 0 ,e "" z zB J ~o g ¡....Q-i o~ 0 z Æ 0> !;( ~8 Æ W '" ;>- :¡¡ ~ ~ "C! ~~ :.t 11.-c~ 0 "!:: oø¡ ~- -ill.-c-c W a.. ~§ I:IJ 0::: 9! ~~~~ I:IJ Œ e:: 0 ~~ ~ w""O:J;;! ¡:: 0 î! oOm{) w ¡:: §; :!~ :><::=0:::0::: -i ~ c a;:g¡i5,c ~ ~ ~iß <\I if & adz ~ 0 ! <:OQ)O~N ~~¿!3~t:;¡~&1~~~~~~~ <>1>00.... _"I"'""NNN "'M........ ,,: ,:)1" e SCHEDULE 1 CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS GENERAL FUND SUMMARY ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES Taxes $10,711,600 $11,376,695 $12,201,187 $12,328,415 $13,293,376 Fines & Forfeitures 581,134 667,797 839,786 775,205 910,084 Licenses & Permits 846,085 1,082,241 1,032,624 1,062,549 1,032,634 Charges for Service 845,703 881,726 850,104 906,107 939,705 Intergovernmental 1,235,000 1 ,394,740 1,585,000 1,585,000 1,399,526 Miscellaneous 282,718 296,730 312,009 248,632 308,500 TOTAL REVENUES $14,502.240 $15,699,929 $16,820,710 $16,905,908 $17,883,825 EXPENDITURES City Council $79,493 $56,275 $80,658 $80,658 $88,355 City Manager 300,334 279,437 276,192 302,097 344,628 e Public Information 0 0 0 0 40,000 City Secretary 222,829 231,573 283,081 287,995 317,620 Legal 94,687 111,878 120,780 122,628 129,165 Human Resources 24,912 29,384 30,983 31,515 34,507 Finance 533,783 569,213 516,381 525,845 546,766 Citicable 112,772 120,500 129,381 131,563 140,032 MIS 188,743 251,066 373,608 377,060 399,987 Municipal Court 388,600 430,416 468,610 484,732 486,362 Planningllnspections 497,540 502,385 594,390 603,825 634,456 Library 700,663 715,856 757,824 777,137 813,674 Environmental Services 327,999 370,265 437,921 454,157 489,057 Public Works 1,385,243 1,616,639 1,787,121 1 ,863,265 1,964,563 Parks & Recreation 1,011,802 1,191,478 1,286,875 1,335,701 1,236,691 Police 4,339,750 4,599,140 4,886,464 5,033,233 5,414,979 Fire 3,099,076 3,155,428 3,483,863 3,566,546 3,914,855 Non-Departmental 965,308 1,190,080 1,306,578 874,753 888,128 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $14,273,534 $15,421,013 $16,820,710 $16,852,710 $17,883,825 BALANCE $228,706 $278,916 $0 $53,198 $0 ------------- ------------- ------------- ===========: ===========: ------------- ------------- ------------- e SCHEDULE 2 e CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS GENERAL FUND REVENUES ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 TAXES Current Property Taxes $3,804,620 $3,520,853 $3,947,241 $3,936,652 $4,193,998 Delinquent Property Taxes 113,965 77 ,937 130,000 116,451 120,000 Penalty and Interest 64,491 59,455 65,000 49,645 52,000 Franchise Fees 1,789,767 2,234,848 2,217,567 2,192,416 2,301,075 Utility Fund Franchise Taxes 233,371 269,147 313,766 313,766 347,287 Sales Taxes 4,503,213 4,988,925 5,293,581 5,485,419 6,033,961 Mixed Beverages 52,432 69,319 67,938 67,626 73,655 Tax Searches 2,078 3,346 1,000 0 0 Payment in Lieu of Taxes 147,663 152,865 165,094 166,440 171 ,400 TOTAL TAXES 10,711,600 11,376,695 12,201,187 12,328,415 13,293,376 FINES AND FORFEITURES Municipal Court Fines 456,594 531,070 662,326 630,753 740,084 Library Fines 42,705 42,634 50,235 44,452 45,000 Warrant Fees 81,835 94,093 127,225 100,000 125,000 e TOTAL FINES AND FORFEITURES 581 ,134 667,797 839,786 775,205 910,084 LICENSES AND PERMITS Miscellaneous Permits 126,732 137,257 138,000 141,100 129,500 Building Permits 355,837 441,210 428,000 436,000 440,000 Electrical Permits 58,683 75,942 62,000 75,000 75,000 Plumbing Permits 30,514 39,595 30,500 39,500 37,000 Curb & Drainage Insp. Fees 36,296 78,180 52,500 25,000 35,000 Re-Inspection Fees 1,880 3,659 3,500 3,000 3,000 License Fees 6,892 9,215 9,000 8,600 9,000 Contractor Registration Fees 50,647 64,865 59,000 62,700 63,000 Animal License Fees 12,834 17,579 21,018 23,000 20,436 Animal Control Impoundment 35,590 38,593 48,159 39,500 41,000 Crematorium Revenues 0 0 11,000 1,000 2,500 Auto Impoundment Fees 77,860 101,500 101 ,500 136,500 102,000 Food Service Permits 35,580 56,860 53,292 53,292 55,500 Food Managers School 9,250 9,495 12,055 11 ,357 11 ,698 Fire Inspection Fees 7,490 8,291 3,100 7,000 8,000 TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS 846,085 1,082,241 1,032,624 1,062,549 1.032,634 e e SCHEDULE 2 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GENERAL FUND REVENUES ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 CHARGES FOR SERVICE Park Facility Rental $5,726 $5,523 $3,096 $5,430 $5,500 Ambulance Fees 198,061 188,587 180,000 225,000 225,000 Garbage Billing 252,348 232,929 240,000 240,000 270,000 Maps & Codes 1,224 (908) 1 ,400 1,100 1,500 Recreation Fees 186,653 187,712 213,608 213,608 220,000 Athletic Revenue 70,164 78,276 76,000 76,000 78,000 Planning & Zoning Fees 15,022 16,119 14,000 14,000 12,000 Sale of Accident Reports 20,361 20,755 22,000 22,000 22,500 Vital Statistics 16,340 17,718 18,500 18,500 19,055 Mowing 29,514 50,820 48,000 48,000 40,000 Detention Services 23,139 3,557 0 0 0 Non-resident Library Fees 14,688 15,323 18,500 15,869 16,050 Citicable Sponsorship 12,463 65,315 0 2,700 4,000 Video Services Income 0 0 15,000 15,000 15,000 Video Tape Sales 0 0 0 2,500 1,500 e SBMS Transmitter Lease Income 0 0 0 6,400 9,600 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE 845,703 881,726 850,104 906,107 939,705 INTERGOVERNMENTAL Admin Fee - General CIP 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 Admin Fee - Utility Fund 1,025,000 1,025,000 1,025,000 1,025,000 1 ,025,000 Admin Fee - Park & Rec. Corp. 0 159,740 350,000 350,000 164,526 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,235,000 1,394,740 1,585,000 1,585,000 1,399,526 MISCELLANEOUS Grant Proceeds - Criminal Justice 0 22,485 70,000 70,000 60,350 Interest Income 198,877 186,458 197,940 150,000 190,000 Sale of City Property 6,138 3,788 3,500 0 0 Other Income 77,703 83,999 25,850 28,632 28,150 Sponsorships - T ASP 0 0 0 0 30,000 Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 0 14,719 ° 0 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 282,718 296,730 312,009 248,632 308,500 TOTAL REVENUES $14,502,240 $15,699,929 $16,820,710 $16,905,908 $17,883,825 ------------- ------------- ------------- ===========: =========== ------------- ------------- ------------- e SCHEDULE 3 e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY ACTIVITY & DEPARTMENT ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 Mayor and Council $79,493 $56,275 $80,658 $80,658 $88,355 City Manager 300,334 279,437 276,192 302,097 344,628 Public Information 0 0 ° 0 40,000 City Secretary Administration 108,026 112,879 131,976 134,328 175,051 Public Information 28,866 27,898 31,944 32,556 42,939 Record Retention 85,937 90,796 119,161 121,111 99,630 Total City Secretary 222,829 231,573 283,081 287,995 317,620 Legal 94,687 111,878 120,780 122,628 129,165 Human Resources 24,912 29,384 30,983 31,515 34,507 e Finance 248,734 269,865 243,456 249,470 263,132 Accounting & Administration Purchasing 85,957 77,517 84,823 86,808 116,977 Central Cashier 64,940 64,502 ° 0 ° Tax 102,688 128,111 144,657 145,518 125,150 Budget 31,464 29,218 43,445 44,049 41,507 Total Finance 533,783 569,213 516,381 525,845 546,766 Citicable 112,772 120,500 129,381 131,563 140,032 MISfTelecom/Data Processing 188,743 251,066 373,608 377,060 399,987 Municipal Court Administration 149,432 107,802 109,596 123,792 104,831 Clerical 126,895 150,621 175,808 176,112 194,263 Warrants 94,698 98,397 101,882 102,782 104,464 Teen Court 17,575 19,216 23,845 24,567 22,465 Judicial 0 54,380 57,479 57,479 60,339 Total Municipal Court 388,600 430,416 468,610 484,732 486,362 Planning and Inspection Services Inspections 431,174 448,835 531,682 542,042 582,437 Planning 66,366 53,550 62,708 61,783 52,019 e Total Planning 1 Inspections 497,540 502,385 594,390 603,825 634,456 SCHEDULE 3 e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY ACTIVITY & DEPARTMENT ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 Library General Services 107,414 95,708 106,471 107,786 111,458 Public Services 300,648 314,282 318,413 330,122 342,921 Technical Services 292,601 305,866 332,940 339,229 359,295 Total Library 700,663 715,856 757,824 777,137 813,674 Environmental Services Animal Control 201,553 276,694 302,845 315,925 358,864 Health Inspections 126,446 93,571 135,076 138,232 130,193 Total Environmental Services 327,999 370,265 437,921 454,157 489,057 Public Works Administration 110,855 118,169 134,873 138,609 148,380 Traffic Control 342,918 357,141 416,749 419,362 454,527 e Street & Drainage 931,470 1,141,329 1,235,499 1,305,294 1,361,656 Total Public Works 1,385,243 1.616.639 1,787,121 1 ,863,265 1,964,563 Park & Recreation Administration 111 ,170 105,394 111 ,559 114,115 48,246 Recreation Services 365,281 391,045 400.462 414,278 388,457 Senior Adult Services 36.870 37,941 53,085 64,473 67,475 Athletic Program Services 0 98,124 116,040 117,248 125,377 Parks Maintenance 304,350 375.377 397,126 406,801 382,266 Public Grounds Maintenance 194,131 183,597 208,603 218,786 224,870 Total Park & Recreation 1,011,802 1,191,478 1,286.875 1,335,701 1,236,691 Police Administration 182,920 217,725 273,678 295,869 280,531 Administrative Services 870,023 577,897 604,109 623,318 647,198 Criminal Investigation 738,487 792,942 805,959 820,055 853,167 Uniform Patrol 1,931,009 2,394,977 2,476,904 2,570,004 2,371,703 Tactical Unit 8,049 9.723 23,300 23,300 25,254 Technical Services 345,916 364,967 395,713 385,201 419,607 Detention Services 178.189 176,153 231 ,1 05 238,420 289,026 Vehicle Impoundment 85,157 64.756 75,696 77,066 83,250 Communications 0 0 0 0 445,243 e Total Police 4,339.750 4,599,140 4,886,464 5,033.233 5,414.979 SCHEDULE 3 e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY ACTIVITY & DEPARTMENT ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 Fire Department Administration 137,532 136,558 143,515 146,607 147,930 Operations 2,321,610 2,362,680 2,664,328 2,724,307 2,956,183 Emergency Medical 159,259 175,324 180,201 182,239 209,671 Support Services 280,440 261,668 233,919 248,094 286,942 Fire Inspections 141,426 141,851 174,560 176,581 201,129 Emergency Management 58,809 77,347 87,340 88,718 113,000 Total Fire 3,099,076 3,155,428 3,483,863 3,566,546 3,914,855 Non-Departmental 965,308 1,190,080 1,306,578 874,753 888,128 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $14,273,534 $15,421,013 $16,820,710 $16,852,710 $17,883,825 ------------- ------------- ------------- -----------. ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------ e e e e e SCHEDULE 4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TENTATIVE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 SCHEDULE OF ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX REVENUE AND TAX DISTRIBUTION NET TAXABLE VALUE: ----------------------------------- Total Appraised Value Less Exemptions: Disabled Veteran Over 65 Homestead Disabled Persons Less: Indigent Housing Loss Abatement Value Loss Agricultural Value Loss Total Reduction to Values NET TAXABLE VALUE ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX COLLECTIONS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Net Taxable Value Proposed Tax Rate per $100 Valuation Estimated Total Tax Levy Estimated % of Collections (97.5%) TOTAL ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX COLLECTIONS TAX COLLECTIONS DISTRIBUTION SCHEDULE: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- % of Total Tax Rate $1,699,219,755 (697,500) (50,793,308) (120,393,044) (4,463,096) (227,300) (6,619,456) (5,634,923) ----------------------- ($188,828,627) ----------------------- $1,510,391,128 -------------- -------------- $1,510,391,128 $ 0.57 ----------------------- $8,609,229 97.5% ----------------------- $8,393,999 -------------- -------------- Tax Rate Distribution ------------------------- General Fund - Maintenance & Operations Interest & Sinking Fund 51.2% 48.8% $0.291927 $0.278073 TOTAL DISTRIBUTION OF TAX COLLECTIONS DISTRIBUTION OF ESTIMATED TAX REVENUE: 100% ------------------------------------------ $0.57000 ------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 100% Collection Projected Collection ------------------------------------------ General Fund - Maintenance & Operations Interest & Sinking Fund $4,409,229 4,200,000 $4,193,998 $4,200,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED TAX REVENUE $8,609,229 ------------------------------------------ $8,393,998 ------------------------- ------------------------- e SCHEDULE 5 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND ANALYSIS Description Actual 1992/93 Budget 1993/94 Revised 1993/94 ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------------------ Beginning Balance $1,422,008 $1,287,279 $1,102,403 Revenues ------------------------------ Ad Valorem Taxes Drainage Utility Interest Income Transfer from Golf Course Transfer from Utility - Debt Service Transfer from Special Investigation Transfer from Utility - TRA Debt 3,926,007 283,619 33,380 324,820 o 71 ,030 o _"""",,,'¡tli, '¥,,',',,!W~.,. ."..~ ... Ú~I:¿M.&t\A.I:~V~¡; [~......~~..~~""''''~~i'''',........._..,.......~·. Expenditures Existing Bonds & C.O.'s 1990 Lease Purchase(MDTs) 1992 Lease Purchase SanwaGEL(AFIS/Radio) Transfer to CIP for Street Projects 4,558,917 71,030 84,514 244,000 .:--~. ~:t~*...~ :;'~~~;~:r'" ,~"':~~"'.~ REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES 4,023,029 509,352 115,227 324,820 89,665 71,030 o 5,252,579 71,030 84,514 o 4,023,029 509,352 100,000 324,820 116,604 71 ,030 300,781 5,252,579 71,030 1) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- (1) This is the final debt payment on the MDT System. (2) Increase of $80,520 to fund reimbursement of 92/93 charge of $244,000 that should be paid 33% from Utility Debt Service. e SCHEDULE 6 e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS UTILITY FUND SUMMARY ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES Water $8,932,130 $10,286,675 $9,770,194 $11,029,291 $11,422,290 Sewer 5,875,025 6,234,935 6,278,774 5,914,744 6,022,303 Miscellaneous 91 0 6,000 0 0 Interest Income 522,646 348,933 220,000 105,199 120,350 Appr. Retained Earnings. 0 0 1,603,379 0 0 Interfund Loans 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL REVENUES $15,329,892 $16,870,543 $17,878,347 $17,049,234 $17,564,943 OPERATING EXPENDITURES Administration $43,014 $51 ,186 $51,886 $53,128 $60,046 Public Works 2,632,555 2,638,846 2,580,207 2,680,194 2,869,075 e Engineering 185,100 177,964 254,932 260,605 271,364 Utility Billing & Collections 1,121,314 1,084,058 1,221,319 1,227,518 1 ,195,353 Purchase of Water/Sewer FTW 3,804,293 4,664,000 5,100,000 4,862,500 5,022,000 Purchase of Water/Sewer TRA 2,626,559 3,019,788 3,300,000 3,162,500 3,075,000 Non-Departmental 357,097 273,410 572,497 537,829 660,079 Total Operating Expenses 10,769,932 11,909,252 13,080,841 12,784,274 13,152,917 OTHER EXPENDITURES & RESERVES Payment to Debt Service $1,728,000 $1,937,049 $2,163,738 $2,163,738 $2,167,163 Franchise Fees 303,697 339,136 313,768 336,540 347,287 Administrative Fees 1,025,000 1,025,000 1,025,000 1,025,000 1,025,000 Reserve for CIP Projects 1,021,612 1,080,778 1,075,000 519,682 642,576 Payment in Lieu of Taxes 206,625 216,886 220,000 220,000 230,000 Total Other Exp. & Reserves 4,284,934 4,598,849 4,797,506 4,264,960 4,412,026 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $15,054,866 $16,508,101 $17,878,347 $17,049,234 $17,564,943 BALANCE $275,027 $362,442 , $0 $0 $0 ------------ ------------ -----------. -----------. ===========: -----------. -----------. ------------ ------------ e SCHEDULE 7 e CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS WATER REVENUES & EXPENDITURES ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES Water Sales $8,389,076 $9,870,445 $9,590,000 $10,818,029 $11,225,040 Service Charges 66,364 76,225 63,078 94,146 86,150 Water Taps 65,584 103,795 78,866 78,866 80,000 Water Inspection Fees 23,933 14,459 14,790 14,790 15.000 Pro-Rata Water 10,193 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 4,158 27,034 15,300 15,300 7,800 Water Wells 8,094 9,934 8,160 8,160 8,300 Water Impact Fees 364,728 184,783 0 0 0 Total Water Sales & Charges $8,932,130 $10,286,675 $9,770,194 $11,029,291 $11,422.290 MISCELLANEOUS Interest Income 313,588 174,467 110,000 52,600 95,700 Sale of City Property 46 0 6,000 0 0 Interfund Loans 0 0 0 0 0 Approp. Ret. Earnings 0 0 978,061 0 0 Total Miscellaneous Revenue $313,634 $174,467 $1,094,061 $52,600 $95,700 e TOTAL REVENUES $9,245,764 $10,461,142 $10,864,255 $11,081,891 $11.517.990 OPERATING EXPENSES Administration $21.507 $25,593 $31.650 $26,564 $40,831 Water Operations 2.001,043 2,093,304 2,006,796 2,098.170 2.267.592 Purchase of Water FTW 2,775,487 3,548,651 3,700,000 3,600,000 3,627,000 Purchase of Water TRA 1,424,785 1,667,832 1,800.000 1,800,000 1,475,000 Field Operations 92.550 88,982 0 0 0 Engineering 0 0 127,466 130,302 173,673 Total Water Operations $6,293,865 $7,398,769 $7.634,262 $7,628,472 $7,543,265 Meter Reading 169,419 170,962 165,794 166,438 214,944 Utility Billing/Customer Service 368,196 365,445 389,199 391,090 400,583 Utility Collection Services 0 0 32,769 33,332 69,903 Budget & Accounting 23,042 5,622 22,899 22,899 103,502 Total Finance & Utility Collections $560,657 $542,029 $610,661 $613.759 788,932 Non-Departmental $178,549 $136,705 $286,249 $328,076 402,648 Total Operating Expenses $7,054,578 $8,103,096 $8,562,822 $8,596,871 $8,775,676 OTHER EXPENDITURES & RESERVES Debt Service 1,107,270 1,266,106 1,368,973 1,368,973 1,371,707 Franchise Fees 170,050 197,703 219,242 235,578 243,100 Administrative Fees 625,250 625,250 625,250 625,250 625,250 e Reserve for CIP Projects 510,806 540,389 537,500 259,841 332,057 Payment In Lieu Of Taxes 103,313 108,443 110,000 110,000 170,200 Total Other Exp. & Reserves $2,516,689 $2,737.891 $2,860,965 $2,599,642 $2,742,314 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $9,571,267 $10,840,987 $11,423,787 $11,196,513 $11,517,990 ---------------- ---------------- BALANCE ($325,503) ($379,846) ($559,532) ($114,623) $0 ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- SCHEDULE 8 e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SEWER REVENUES & EXPENDITURES ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES Sewer Sales $5,707,928 $6,117,961 $6,177,989 $5,845,027 $5,900,000 Sewer Taps 22,475 28,895 33,405 33,405 34,220 Sewer Transportation 14,443 13,931 17,830 17,830 18,283 Sewer Inspection Fees 19,659 15,251 18,482 18,482 19,000 Pro-Rata Sewer 1,536 0 0 0 0 Sewer Access Fees 0 0 0 0 0 Sewer Impact Fees 108,984 58,897 0 0 0 Service Charges 0 0 31,068 0 43,000 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 7,800 Total Sewer Sales & Charges $5,875,025 $6,234,935 $6,278,774 $5,914,744 $6,022,303 MISCELLANEOUS Interest Income 209,058 174,467 110,000 52,600 24,650 Sale of City Property 46 0 0 0 0 Interfund Loans 0 0 0 0 0 Approp. Ret. Earnings 0 0 625,318 0 0 Total Miscellaneous Revenue $209,104 $174,467 $735,318 $52,600 $24,650 e TOTAL REVENUES $6,084,129 $6,409,402 $7,014,092 $5,967,343 $6,046,953 OPERATING EXPENSES Administration $21,507 $25,593 $20,236 $26,564 $19,215 Sewer Operations 631,512 545,542 573,411 582,024 601,483 Sewer Treatment FTW 1,028,806 1,115,349 1,400,000 1,262,500 1,395,000 Sewer Treatment TRA 1,201,774 1,351,956 1,500,000 1 ,362,500 1,600,000 Field Operations 92,550 88,982 0 0 0 Engineering 0 0 127,466 130,303 97,691 Total Sewer Operations $2,954,642 $3,101,829 $3,600,877 $3,337,327 $3,694,174 Meter Reading 169,419 170,962 165,793 166,438 110,729 Utility Billing/Customer Service 368,196 365,445 389,198 391,090 206,361 Utility Collection Services 0 0 32,768 33,332 36,011 Budget & Accounting 23,042 5,622 22,899 22,899 53,320 Total Finance & Utility Collections $560,657 $542,029 $610,658 $613,759 $406,421 Non-Departmental $178,548 $136,705 $286,248 $209,753 $257,431 Total Operating Expenses $3,715,354 $3,806,156 $4,518,019 $4,187,403 $4,377,241 OTHER EXPENDITURES & RESERVES Debt Service 620,730 670,943 794,765 794,765 795,456 Franchise Fees 133,647 141,433 94,526 100,962 104,187 Administrative Fees 399,750 399,750 399,750 399,750 399,750 e Reserve for CIP Projects 510,806 540,389 537,500 259,841 310,519 Payment In Lieu Of Taxes 103,313 108,443 110,000 110,000 59,800 Total Other Exp. & Reserves $1,768,246 $1,860,958 $1,936,541 $1,665,318 $1,669,712 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $5,483,599 $5,667,114 $6,454,560 $5,852,721 $6,046,953 ---------------- ----------- BALANCE ===J~22,;,~~O": $742,288 $559,532 $114,623 $0 ___________. ___________. -----______0 -----------. -----------. -----------. -----------. -----------. e SCHEDULE 9 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MANAGEMENT SERVICES FUND SUMMARY ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BDUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES Building Maintenance $761,353 $849,485 $979,919 $1,030,479 $1 ,272,867 Equipment Services 1,004,886 1,140,357 1,665,999 1,674,409 1 ,878,061 TOTAL REVENUES $1,766,239 $1,989,842 $2,645,918 $2,704,888 $3,150,928 EXPENDITURES Administration $93,514 $114,507 $122,406 $125,400 $137,788 Building Maintenance 677,241 697,968 904,488 910,741 1,126,058 Equipment Services 863,014 727,286 1,224,862 1,226,440 1,417 ,815 Non-Departmental 48 4,364 24,962 14,138 0 Building Maintenance Reserve 37,331 92,082 0 50,560 77,915 Equipment Services Reserve 95,091 353,635 369,200 377,609 391,352 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,766,239 $1,989,842 $2,645,918 $2,704,888 $3,150,928 e BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ===========: ===========: ===========: ===========: ==-.........1 e SCHEDULE 10 e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MANAGEMENT SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF BUILDING MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES CHARGES FOR SERVICE General Fund $553,354 $543,590 $587,500 $587,500 $579,504 Utility Fund 204,669 303,124 391,669 391,669 $504,863 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE $758,023 $846,714 $979,169 $979,169 $1,084,367 OTHER REVENUE Interest Income 3,330 2,733 750 8,410 9,000 Other Income 0 38 0 0 0 Appropriation from Building Capital Projects 0 0 0 $42,900 179,500 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE $3,330 $2,771 $750 $51,310 $188,500 TOTAL REVENUES $761,353 $849,485 $979,919 $1,030,479 $1,272,867 e EXPENDITURES Administration 46,757 57.253 61,203 62,700 $68,894 Building Maintenance 677,241 697,968 904,488 910,741 1,126,058 Non-Departmental 24 2,182 14,228 14,138 0 Reserve for Building Capital Projects 37,331 92,082 0 42,900 77,915 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $761,353 $849,485 $979,919 $1,030,479 $1,272,867 NET INCOME(LOSS) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ------------ ------------ ============ ===========1 ==....=====1 ------------ ------------ e SCHEDULE 11 e CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS MANAGEMENT SERVICES FUND SUMMARY OF EQUIPMENT SERVICE OPERATIONS ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES CHARGES FOR SERVICE General Fund $585,098 $563,877 $473,877 $473,877 $505,246 Utility Fund 415,508 487,432 502,843 502,843 525,812 Utility CIP / Construction 0 13,291 17,992 17,992 35,559 General CIP Fund 0 8,590 3,889 3,889 4,195 Promotional Fund 950 1,058 0 0 0 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE $1,001,556 $1,074,248 $998,601 $998,601 $1,070,812 OTHER REVENUE Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 0 109,248 108,658 0 Approp. Vehicle Maint. Reserve 0 0 524,600 524,600 768,249 Interest Income 3,330 2,733 750 9,750 9,000 Sale of City Property 0 63,338 32,800 32,800 30,000 Other Income 0 38 0 0 0 . TOTAL OTHER REVENUE $3,330 $66,109 $667,398 $675,808 $807,249 TOTAL REVENUES $1,004,886 $1,140,357 $1,665,999 $1,674,409 $1,878,061 EXPENDITURES Administration $46,757 $57,254 $61,203 $62,700 $68,894 Equipment Services 863,014 727,286 1,224,862 1 ,226,440 1,417,815 Non-Departmental 24 2,182 10,734 0 0 Reserve for Equipment Services 95,091 353,635 369,200 385,269 391,352 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,004,886 $1,140,357 $1,665,999 $1,674,409 $1,878,061 NET INCOME(LOSS) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -----------. ------------ ===========: ===========: ===...=....: -----------. -----------. e SCHEDULE 12 e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SELF-INSURANCE FUNDS SUMMARY ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES General Fund $1,428,435 $1,445,987 $1,306,547 $1,307,247 $1,451,275 Utility Fund 465,295 439,450 511,932 511,932 501,512 Management Services 120,348 107,870 107,870 107,870 116,252 Miscellaneous Funds 0 28,109 26,834 26,834 57,046 Dependent Receipts 0 257,611 319,200 319,200 357,504 Electric Franchise Fees 0 0 178,500 178,500 190,000 Interest Income 89,142 71,959 52,640 52,040 54,624 Miscellaneous 0 8,629 0 49,230 0 TOTAL REVENUES $2,103,220 $2,359,615 $2,503,523 $2,552,853 $2,728,213 EXPENDITURES Payment of Claims: General Fund $1,546,386 $2,278,227 $1,896,791 $1,918,612 $1,965,000 Utility Fund 312,388 281,164 348,612 302,532 321,000 e Management Services 121,425 71,807 90,110 146,910 127,100 Life Insurance Premiums 0 51,684 0 51,680 51,280 Personnel Activity 119,472 123,231 133,119 133,119 168,325 Reserve for Insurance Claims 3,549 (446,498) 34,891 0 95,508 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,103,220 $2,359,615 $2,503,523 $2,552,853 $2,728,213 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ------------ -----------. -----------. ===========: ===========: -----------. -----------. ------------ e SCHEDULE 13 e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SELF-INSURANCE FUND REVENUES ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES General Fund Health $1,068,901 $1,096,123 $955,192 $955,192 $1,078,270 Worker's Compensation 218,275 222,597 223,055 223,755 244,705 General Liability 141,259 127,267 128,300 128,300 128,300 General Fund Revenues 1,428,435 1,445,987 1,306,547 1,307,247 1,451,275 Utility Fund Health 288,195 245,200 301 ,907 301,907 294,787 Worker's Compensation 160,150 169,250 185,025 185,025 181,725 General Liability 16,950 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Utility Fund Revenues 465,295 439,450 $511,932 $511,932 $501,512 Management Services Health 82,698 69,520 69,520 69,520 77,902 Worker's Compensation 13,650 14,350 14,350 14,350 14,350 - General Liability 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 Mgmt. Services Revenues 120,348 107,870 107,870 107,870 116,252 Miscellaneous Funds Health 0 21,139 20,589 20,589 46,391 Worker's Compensation 0 6,970 6,245 6,245 10,655 Misc. Funds Revenue 0 28,109 26,834 26,834 57,046 Other Revenues Other Income 0 8,629 0 49,230 0 Dependant Recipts 0 257,611 319,200 319,200 357,504 Franchise Fees 0 0 178,500 178,500 190,000 Interest Income 89,142 71,959 52,640 52,040 54,624 Other Revenues 89,142 338,199 550,340 598,970 602,128 TOTAL REVENUES $2,103,220 $2,359,615 $2,503,523 $2,552,853 $2,728,213 -----------. -----------. ------------ ===========: ====...====- -----------. -----------. -----------. e SCHEDULE 14 e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SELF-INSURANCE FUND EXPENDITURES ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS General Fund Health $1,321,703 $2,139,486 $1,714,240 $1,713,061 $1,775,000 Worker's Compensation 211,331 68,188 65,551 155,551 130,000 General Liability 13,352 70,553 117 ,000 50,000 60,000 General Fund Expenditures 1,546,386 2,278,227 1,896,791 1,918,612 1,965,000 Utility Fund Health 287,928 259,038 316,120 263,120 280,000 Worker's Compensation 12,941 19.589 20,777 20,777 25,000 General Liability 11,519 2,537 11,715 18,635 16,000 Utility Fund Expenditures 312,388 281,164 348,612 302,532 321,000 . Management Services Health 113,440 71,663 86,810 144,810 125,000 Worker's Compensation 7,985 144 300 300 300 General Liability 0 0 3,000 1,800 1,800 Mgmt. Services Expenditures 121,425 71,807 90,110 146,910 127,100 Total Claims 1,980,199 2,631,198 2,335,513 2,368,054 2,413,100 Insurance Fund-Personnel Operating Budget 119,472 123,231 133,119 133,119 168,325 Ufe Insurance Premiums 0 51,684 ° 51,680 51,280 Reserve for Insurance Claims 3,549 (446,498) 34,891 0 95,508 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,103,220 $2,359,615 $2,503,523 $2,552,853 $2,728,213 ===========: ======-====: ============ ===========: ==........., . e SCHEDULE 15 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND REVENUE & EXPENDITURES SUMMARY ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES Sales Tax $0 $1,515,721 $2,646,790 $2,742,710 $3,016,981 Interest Income 0 69,500 15,000 70,000 70,000 TOTAL REVENUES $0 $1,585,221 $2,661,790 $2,812,710 $3,086,981 EXPENDITURES OPERATING EXPENSES Park Facilities Development Admin. $0 $99,039 $217,000 $217 ,000 $223,498 Administrative Fees 0 60,701 133,000 133,000 164,526 Maintenance & Operations 0 31,051 65,000 122,000 165,439 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $0 $190,791 $415,000 $472,000 $553,463 - OTHER EXPENDITURES & RESERVES Debt Service 0 390,253 701,228 701,228 1,071,721 Reserve for Capital Projects 0 992,527 1,545,562 1,639,482 1,461,797 Undesignated Fund Balance 0 11 ,650 0 0 0 TOTAL OTHER EXP. & RESERVES $0 $1,394,430 $2,246,790 $2,340,710 $2,533,518 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 $1,585,221 $2,661,790 $2,812,710 $3,086,981 NET INCOME (LOSS) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ------------ ------------ ===========: ===========: ===-=======: ------------ ------------ . . SCHEDULE 16 CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PROMOTIONAL FUND REVENUE & EXPENDITURES SUMMARY ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES Occupancy Tax Proceeds $159,282 $155,828 $200,000 $200,000 $212,000 Interest Income 6,609 4,587 4,900 4,900 4,264 Appropriation of Fund Balance 4,065 12,134 26,843 50,690 0 TOTAL REVENUES $169,956 $172,549 $231,743 $255,590 $216,264 EXPENDITURES Economic Development $169,956 $172,549 $231,743 $255.590 $216,264 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $169,956 $172,549 $231,743 $255,590 $216,264 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -----------. ------------ ===========: ============ ==........=: -----------. ------------ . . -- SCHEDULE 17 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DONATIONS FUND REVENUE & EXPENDITURES SUMMARY ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES Contributions from Water Bills $91,352 $91,352 $96,000 $92,000 $92,300 Grant Proceeds 13,750 13,750 0 5,500 34,715 Interest Income 5,735 5,735 0 4,000 0 Publicity Fees 0 0 20,000 20,000 24,999 Special Event Sponsorships 0 0 45,906 45,906 30,425 Approp. of Fund Balance-Parks 1,940 8,625 0 54,425 0 TOTAL REVENUES $112,777 $119,462 $161,906 $221,831 ' $182,439 EXPENDITURES Parks $66,064 $66,064 $65,906 $125,831 $90,139 Library 46,713 46,713 48,000 48,000 46,000 Animal Control 0 6,685 28,800 28,800 27,800 General Public Improvements 0 0 19,200 19,200 18,500 . TOTAL EXPENDITURES $112,777 $119,462 $161,906 $221,831 $182,439 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ------------ ------------ ------------ ===========: ==....=====1 ------------ ------------ ------------ . · SCHEDULE 18 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CIP PERSONNEL FUNDS REVENUE & EXPENDITURES SUMMARY ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES Appropriation from CIP Unspecified $250,726 $796,413 $773,213 $773,213 $722,831 TOTAL REVENUES $250,726 $796,413 $773,213 $773,213 $722,831 EXPENDITURES General CIP Personnel $100,041 $85,206 $82,440 $82,440 $84,959 Utility CIP Personnel 150,685 151,911 108,773 108,773 111,514 Utility Construction 0 323,322 582,000 582,000 526,358 Designated Reserve / CIP Projects 0 235,974 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $250,726 $796,413 $773,213 $773,213 $722,831 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ===========: ===========: ===========: ===========: ===========: · · - SCHEDULE 19 CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND REVENUE & EXPENDITURES SUMMARY ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES Drainage Fees $542,216 $570,096 $600,000 $639,000 $640,000 Interest Income 0 3,009 3,200 1,685 2,000 Appropriation of Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL REVENUES $542,216 $573,105 $603,200 $640,685 $642,000 EXPENDITURES Engineering $3,173 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfer for General CIP 539,043 289,486 93,848 131,333 171,157 Transfer to Debt Service 0 283,619 509,352 509,352 470,843 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $542,216 $573,105 $603,200 $640,685 $642,000 . BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -----------. ------------ ------------ -----------. ===========: -----------. ------------ ------------ -----------. . , I. SCHEDULE 20 CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FUND REVENUE & EXPENDITURES SUMMARY ADOPTED REVISED TENTATIVE ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY 1993/94 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 REVENUES Federal Forfeited Funds $71,030 $64,562 $64,562 $95,513 $35,515 State Forfeited Funds 0 6,468 6,468 6,468 0 Interest Income 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer from General Fund 0 0 0 30,000 0 Transfer from Utility Fund 0 0 0 6,772 0 TOTAL REVENUES $71 ,030 $71,030 $71,030 $138,753 $35,515 EXPENDITURES Debt Service - MDT's $71,030 $71,030 $71,030 $71,030 $35,515 Capital - Dictaphone 0 0 0 67,723 0 " TOTAL EXPENDITURES $71,030 $71,030 $71,030 $138,753 $35,515 BALANCE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -----------. ------------ -----------. ===========: ==..=======: ------------ ------------ -----------. . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Approve Revision of Asphalt Street Design Subject: Requirements - Resolution No g4-4~ Council Meeting Date: 9/12/94 . Agenda Number: GN 94-118 The CIP Committee has reviewed the City's current design requirements for asphalt and concrete streets and recommend the asphalt thickness on residential streets be increased from 6 inches to 8 inches. The stabilized subgrade for the asphalt residential street should also be increased from 6 inches to 8 inches. This same adjustment should apply to all collector and arterial/industrial asphalt streets. This will cause the design cross section details for Figures 8, 10 and 12 in the Public Works Design Manual (adopted by Council 3/13/89, Resolution #89-17) to be revised as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". The CIP Committee based its recommendation on the fact that engineering calculations show 5 inches of reinforced concrete pavement (the City's current requirement for a concrete residential street) is equivalent to approximately 8 inches of hot mix asphaltic concrete pavement. There are a number of plats, both preliminary and final, being reviewed. These would be subject to the existing street specifications. Any plat not finalized in the allotted time frame, will use the new specifications. All plats submitted after October 1, 1994 will be subject to the new design requirements. Attached are two lists. One is subdivisions under construction and the type of streets being constructed. The other is a listing of all plats now in house. Also attached is a summary of a "Residential Pavement Survey" conducted by staff. Rp£ommenct::ltion: The CIP Committee and staff recommend Council approve Resolution No. 94-45. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ;e4~~ ent Head Signature ity Manager CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM FI....... Director Page 1 of · · · RESOLUTION NO. 94-45 WHEREAS, the City Council of the city of North Richland Hills and its staff desire to revise the minimum design criteria for all asphalt streets proposed to be installed; and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously passed Resolution No. 89-17 which approved a "Design Manual" for said Public Works/Utilities improvements. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The cross-section details in Figures 8, 10, and 12 of the Public Works Design Manual (as adopted by Resolution 89-17) are hereby revised to reflect the thicknesses and minimum lime applications shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 12th day of September, 1994. Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL TIY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City · · < E-c ÞO-4 == 63 ~ ~ · Q,> == .§ ~:~ ~C;ç; ~ = .~ rJ:J 0=--- c.o:.ërJ:J ~~~¿ ~ Q,> N .... - ..c ~ .... rJ:J Q,> rIJ ~~~ ~ ~ C o"'~ c.elI(,, o ..c .... ~J5~ ~ Q,> N .... - :.ë ~ .... rJ:J Q,> ~ ell "0 Q,> C ~ C .... '" ~ .... ell (,, .~ ..c .- ~ = .c ~rJ:J~ ~ ~ Q,> Q,> ~ U c c.< ~ ~~~ u < ~ rIJ elI~ C C .... ~ :!j .S:! ~~ - ~ = = ~ . ~~ = Q,> .~ '" ~ .~ Q~ .. 0.... Q,> Q,> c.f: >..... ~rJ:J ]~ C-- O~ -0 _ -C;; ~ OM ~ o -.::t 00 V) V) 00 00 ...... ...... 1.0 00 00 00 0\0 ...... 1.0 t" 00 00 o ...... ï..:~~ .9---- g:O:O :::::00\ O-.::t-.::t U o V) o ...... 00 o ...... 00 ~ ...... ~ -- --~~ ~ ,: .¡: ~ 0\ o =' -.::t t::-o^ <.5 . Subdivisions Under Construction Subdivision Name Briarwood 8th Bridlewood Century Oaks 3rd Emerald Lakes Meadow Lakes North Meadow Lakes VI Oak Hills Court Southridge Estates Spring Oaks Estates Steeple Ridge III Thornbridge I Thornbridge IIA Woodland Terrace Status Under Construction Completed Under Construction Completed Completed Completed Completed Under Construction Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed **** Pavement Type Asphalt Concrete Asphalt Concrete Concrete Asphalt **** Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Asphalt **** streets not constructed at this time . . . Subdivision Name Shady Oaks 2 Shady Oaks 3 Shady Oaks 4 Thornbridge IV-A Brittany Park Estates Forest Glen Oak Hills II Thornbridge (all phases) Shady Oaks 5 . . Plats Submitted for Review Status Final Plat Approved Final Plat Approved Final Plat Approved Final Plat Approved Preliminary Plat Approved Preliminary Plat Approved Preliminary Plat Approved Preliminary Plat Approved Under Review No. of Lots 52 54 17 7 28 140 84 200 112 · CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Public Works Department RESIDENTIAL PAVEMENT SURVEY July 7, 1994 · .'..,..,.'. CITY CONTACT CONCRETE O/R SUB. ASPHALT O/R SUB. Arlington Johney Sudbury 5 0 8 6 0 8 817/275-3271 Bedford Ed Powell 5 0 6 5 0 6 817/952-2126 Carroll ton Joe Evans 6 R 6 214/466-3000 Colleyville Scott Dier 5 0 6 7 0 8 817/577-7587 Coppell Garreth Campbell 6 R 6 214/462-0022 Dallas Don Richardson 6 R none 214/948-4290 4000 psi Denton Dave Solmon 5 0 6 5 0 6 817/566-8200 Euless Andrea Baxter 6 0 6 6 0 6 817/685-1400 Ft. Worth Tony Shola 5 0 6 6 0 8 817/871-7899 Grand Prairie Roland Barton 6 R 6 214/660-8141 Grapevine Danny Porter 6 0 6 5 0 6 817/481-0300 Hurst Tony Bates 5 0 6 6 0 6 817/788- 7000 Irving Mike Walker 5 R 8 - with cement 214/721-2600 6 - with lime · NOTE: O/R = Optional/Required SUB. = Subgrade All numbers shown are in inches. · I CITY I CONTACT I CONCRETE I O/R I SUB. I ASPHALT I O/RI SUB. I Keller Mike Barnes 6 R 6 817/431-1055 Lewisville Debra Paul 6 R 6 214/219-3469 PIano Alan Upchurch 6 w/3000 psi R 6 214/424-6531 5 w/3600 psi Richardson Len McManess 6 R Com- 214/238-4100 pacted Southlake Ron Harper 5 0 6 6 0 6 817/481-5581 · · NOTE: OIR = Optional/Required SUB. = Subgrade All numbers shown are in inches. I . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Police Council Meeting Date: 9/12/94 Subject: Authorize Purchase of Dictaphone Communications Master Recorder Agenda Number: PU 94-69 The Police Department Communications section's master recording device is in need of replacement. The present equipment is a Dictaphone system that was purchased over ten years ago and is no longer able to provide dependable service. Staff requests the replacement equipment be Dictaphone. This recorder causes all radio primary traffic, as well as several telephones lines, to be recorded in the Communications Section where all 911 calls are answered. This equipment aids in the ability to verify how various calls have been received and dealt with by the Police, Fire and other City Departments that operate on a 24 hour per day basis. The proposed Dictaphone recorder may be purchased through Houston Galveston Area Council Cooperative Purchasing Program (HGAC). All competitive bid laws will be met if Council authorizes this purchase through HGAC. The total amount for this equipment will be $67,723. Funding Source: There are sufficient funds available for this purchase as follows: Police Department Fire Department Utility Department Forfeited Funds (03-00-00-4810) $15,000 15,000 6,772 30.951 $67,723 -- ---- Recommendation: It is recommended City Council authorize the purchase of a Dictaphone communications recorder through the Houston Galveston Area Council Cooperative Purchasing Program in the amount of$67,723. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other Finance Review Acct. Number 03-80-00-6400 ufficient Funds A ilable Fin....ce Director Departmen Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Department: MIS /Management Services Council Meeting Date: 9-12-94 Agenda Number: PU 94-70 Subject: Sale of Police System 36 The Police Department has now converted their data processing activities to the IBM ASj400. The City of South Houston has proposed to purchase the old police System 36 which is of no future use to our City. MIS has consulted with XL Data Comp, IBM Corporation and LeBlanc & Associates Consultants to determine the resale price. All three sources stated if we could get someone to pay the freight to ship to their destination we would be fortunate. The City of South Houston has offered $500 plus all shipping costs. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council authorize the sale of the Police Department's System 36 computer to the City of South Houston for the price of $500 plus shipping cost. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ,i( au;, - Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director - ~ 1 · e e SEP 07 '94 09: IbHI1 nORTH ~:;>.~hLl::r'1D HILLS PUBLIC dBR P.2 City of Soutq HoustoQ p" lice Ð~partl11eIlt BOx 238 , SOUTH HOUSTON, TEXAS 77587 . PHON! 944.1910 DAN ROSENBERG SAIIIGEANT' North Richland Hills Police Department Box 820609 North Richland Hills. Texas 76182 Att. Director of Public Saftey \1TS Kane Kelly Mr. Kelly, This letter is to confirm the conv~rsation that you had on 8/.5/94 with Mike Chubirka. The conversation was concerning the pW'chase of your departm.ents I.B.M. 5360 computer and tape unit. At this time our City would like to make an offer ofSSOO.OO for the machine and what ever accessories may come with it. We also realize that the responsibility for smpping the unit from YOW' department to ours, is our responsibility, I apprecia.te your time and effort in this matter. Mike and 1 are planning to come to your location in near furore and 1 am looking forward to meeting you. Sgt.' an scnberg Perso~ and Tralning CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS epartment: Subject: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Approval of Sanitary Sewer Easement across Iron Horse Golf Course to serve Iron Horse West Addition Agenda Number: 9/12/94 PU 94-71 Iron Horse West Addition is a residential subdivision being developed and platted in Haltom City, west of and adjacent to Iron Horse Golf Course on the west side of Big Fossil Creek. The sanitary sewer discharge from this addition falls toward Haltom City's 21" sanitary sewer main on Iron Horse Golf Course. This 21" main runs from north to south adjacent to Big Fossil Creek in the city limits of Haltom City. The developer of Iron Horse West Addition has requested the city of North Richland Hills grant a 15-foot wide permanent sanitary sewer easement to the city of Haltom City for the proposed 8" sanitary sewer main to be located within. RP.r.ommp.nd~tion : It is recommended that City Council approve granting the 15-foot sanitary sewer easement to the City of Haltom City. e Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) .perating Budg t t r Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Fin....,. Director , Page 1 of . . . :Þ t..' 9. ' . II E . " .~:.~ .., ',\ . ,._'....',_ SIJIIDAII:~ M"M . - ... Ü' 15' - __..... .' f..¡.' . , ", ,~,', , ...tIorth.. i. ' - V;-. ; -I'11III :wa,' L- ...~: fA. ~ .~' CO ,- OMapICO. E' BR VICINITY !+1J l- ~ MAP é \/V cC;: I L ï< 0 IJ' A-Ù[);T/ON fill L TO M C;Tj \, -~-J I ì? ðlJ I , --H , , .--4 , , ¡i ""'T'-I , , \ \ STA 4+7g.3 LN: -A CONST. STD. M.H. LOT 28 11..00< I 2S /.... iA 12+77.2g LN: "A" JNST. STD. M.H. L-2_~~ '-.J.. \\ ~'''''' 23 \\ ""-" \ \ 22 ""- \\ --------~-\ \ -----1--- I -- I I ...._.._ WE~I IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE \\\ \~ \~.A \t \~ \~ \1- \\ ~ REMOVE c!. REPU.CE 180 SF. OF CONCRETE CART PATH BY SAW aJTTNG LINE -A- AvDIT/O¡V ST A 0+00.0 BEGN LN: "A' CotfoECT TO EXIST. Mm-iOLE ON 24" SAN. SEWER \ \ \ NOTE: CONl'RACTOR SHALL. CONTACT I1TCH HARRELL AT TI-E RON HORSE GOLF CQl...RSE (817)485-6666. AT LEAST 48 ~S PRIOR TO ~ CONSTRUCTION ON TI-E GOLF CQl...RSE PROPERTY. r---¡-- I I I ...._... 1.._.._ : 1--- I ~ : ® : ø : ~ : @ I ------L----L-:.9á L___1___J . . . CITY OF HALTOM CITY SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS § § § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF TARRANT That, THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS, Grantor herein, for and in consideration of the swn ofTen ($10.00) Dollars and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid by Grantee herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, have granted, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do grant, sell and convey to the CITY OF HALTOM CITY, Grantee herein, of Tarrant County, Texas, a permanent and perpetual easement for the purpose of installing, repairing, maintaining, altering, replacing, relocating, and operating an 8" Sanitary Sewer Line and appurtenances in, into, upon, across and tmder that land in Tarrant COtmty, Texas, described as follows, to-wit: A IS' wide pennanent Sanitary Sewer Easement on the Iron Horse Golf Course. See attached Exhibit "A" for sanitary sewer easement property description together with the right of ingress and egress as necessary for such purposes. Grantor covenants and agrees that Grantor and Grantor's heirs, representatives, successors and assigns shall at no time erect, place or construct, or cause to be erected, placed or constructed over any easement granted herein any temporary or pennanent structures other than concrete sidewalk or channel liner, and it is further agreed that Grantee shall have the right to excavate and fill upon said pennanent easement and to remove from said pennanent easement any fences, buildings or other obstructions as may now be fotmd upon said pennanent easement. Grantor has this day additionally granted, sold and conveyed and by these presents does hereby grant, sell and convey to Grantee an additional contiguous temporary construction easement for a period of one (1) year for the purpose of installing the sanitary sewer on the property known and described as follows, to-wit: . . . A 50' wide temporary construction easement as shown on attached Exhibit "A". Such temporary easement shall include the right to excavate and temporarily stockpile backfill material on said temporary easement. By recording this easement, Grantee agrees to replace any fences or other fixtures upon the temporary easement without cost to Grantor and further agrees to restore the permanent easement area and additional construction zone to a condition equal (or as nearly as possible equal) to its condition prior to entry thereon. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described permanent easement, together with all and singular, the rights and appurtenances thereto, anywise belonging wrto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and I/We do hereby bind myself/ourselves, my/our heirs and assigns, to warrant and to forever defend all singular the premises Wlto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, against every person whosoever lawfully claiming or to claim same or any part thereof by, through or lUlder Grantor.tEXECUTED this the day of , 19_. ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City BY: Tommy Brown, MAYOR . CORPORATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTYOFTARRANT § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority in and for said County, Texas? on this day personally appeared known to me to be the Mayor of the City of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation, and acknowledged to me that he was duly authorized to execute the foregoing easement as the act of such corporation, for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this day of 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My Commission Expires: Type or Print Notary's Name . 3 . .. " e'fl4-l e» T A . :I:f'.oN HoRS.E. GOI..F C.O""R~E.. "\""Rj..c:.T T~ '\oIE. c"LT"(" of lVoR'T¡.t 1i!IC"""_Ao.):> "'IL...I..S REc.. VOl.., 9,.!:>8. pc" 531$ O.e.T.c'.". \ PE.RM""'e.......T SAo.J. ~E"", e..-. s e.. .., £. o-JT o. t oz~ AC.. .300,91 ,.¡ W %'S·Z....SI··W ''''.c..o P.O.~.~ L..oT 26 , eo 1-0<:'1<. I :z: 1õt o..,¡ ... 0 R sE. WIlE ~ AbO L'T , 0 tV "F ....70 TEMPoRA.RY Goo.) S~Uc:.'IOo.J £"'S.E.M£"-IT ~ c/ O' ~, Q 1/\ III 50·sa·s~\1 15.00 o ~ ~ wi. .s 5C.""_iõ:.: I _ 10.:> ¡:E:íH1ANt:.NT ;,!^til'IARY .:!¡""WEí~ E.!'.:::i'.MF~n . ALL ')f that certaIn tract 0: Darcel of lan,j .-.ituated in thp. HEIRS ûF S. SAWYER SURVEY, Abst:.Iact No. 1425. :',rrant County, Texas and f'mbracin'l a portion of th'! :::::~C't ,1,::~cz:ibed in the deed to The Citv IIf North Ric,,1dnd Hill:: ~~RH' recorded in Volume 94'5&, paqe ~38 of tht' ¡:.~~O Î'~c::':os, T~rr;'ir.t County, Texas and described by metes and bOllnds'is follows: COMMENCING at a 1/2 inch c-apppd :::teel :r~)d ,tampej "Hoak Surv. Inc." for 3 West~r1y corner oi s1id NRH tract and for the Southeast corner ûi Let 2~, &IOCK 1, IrQn Horse West Addition an additlon to thp City at Hdltom City recorded in Cabinet A, Sllde 1836 of the Plat RecQrds, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 23 degrees 24 minutes Sl seconds West with a Westerly boundary line of said NRH tract: and the Easterly boundary line of said Lot 2ij a distance of ]96.04 feet to a 1/2 Inch capped steel rod stamped "Hoalr. Surv. rnc." for the PLACE OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 23 degrees 24 minutes 51 seconds Weë;t 16.60 feet to a 1/2 inch capped steel rod stamped rHoak 3urv. Inc."; THENCE South 88 deqrees 27 minutes feet to a 1/2 inch capped steel Inc."; THENCE South 01 feet to a 1/2 Inc."; deqrees ~!1 inch capped minute~ 5'5 steel r,:d 20 sec!)nds rod stamped East, "Hoak 300.91 Surv. seconds :-tampeù W~st, "~:1ak 15.00 Surv. THENCE North 88 degrees 35 minutes 35 seconds West., 293.79 feet to the place of beg1nning and containinq 0.1024 Acres of land, more or less. . \::¿ß"u TYPE 3 DAVID C. MOAK SU"WrtJltS, INC. RnlSTlltED ,"UILIC SURVEYOR p.o. BOX 1034 M8-2211 HURST, TEXAS DAn: B- S - 1.!!J9'-# N0',93_ZS! CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Ratify Contract with Dustrol, Inc. for Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete Rejuvenation on Starnes Road from Rufe Snow to Agenda Number: Crosstimbers 9/12/94 Subject: PW 94-30 Staff has investigated an alternate process of street maintenance which could be used on streets needing to be seal coated but not necessarily in need of a 2-inch thick asphalt overlay. The process which was recommended to the CIP Committee (at their 8/23/94 meeting) is the process of heater scarification with rejuvenation of the existing asphalt and then a I-inch asphalt overlay. This process is currently being used by the City of Fort Worth and the City of Bedford. In order to let the Mayor and Council see what this process entails and how quickly it can be accomplished, we recommended this section of Starnes Road be a test project. A proposal from Dustrol, Inc. has been acquired. Dustrol, Inc. would do everything but the 1" asphalt overlay for approximately $11,700. The City crews would do the overlay for a cost of $7,000 for the asphalt. The total cost for this 1200 foot long stretch of 40-foot wide roadway would be $18,700. The contract can be legally accepted as part of a test program. Dustrol, Inc. has said they can start construction within 4 weeks after approval of their contract. Fundinr; Source: Sufficient funds are available in Unspecified Street Fund Balance. Re~ommendation : The CIP Committee and staff recommend Council ratify the contract with Dustrol, Inc. for $11,707.60 and appropriate an additional $7,000 for purchase of asphalt materials for staff to resurface Starnes Road. Finance Review , Fin....,. Director . nature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of r · DUSTROL INC. P.O. BOX 1738 ROANOKE, TEXAS 76262 (817) 430-3958 (METRO) \817) 491-2354 (FAX) ---~~--- ----~_.. -_._._-----_.-----------_._._---~------~-----_._~_.._~--- PROPOSAL Date:August 23.1994 To: City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 ATTN: Greg Dickens Re: Hot Mix Aspnaltlc Concrete Rejuvenation-Starnes Road Quantlties and Prlces: Approx. Item # Description Quantity Extension .1. Wedge Milling (0-2") 6 2,400.00 LF @ $ 2.00 per LF = $ 4,800.00 2 . HMAC Recycling 4,934.00 SY @ $ 1 .25 per SY = $ 6,167.50 3. Rejuvenating Agent 4,934.00 SY @ $ O. 15 per SY = $ 740 . 1 0 TOTAL: $ 11 , 707 . 60 "X" DENOTES SERVICES PROVIDED: X Mllling X Loadlng X Trucking & Disposal Temporary Stripe X Sweeping & Cleanlng X Detall & Handwork X Lane Closures X Stockplle Maintenance Bond & AGC Dues X Water Heat Scarify Compaction Engineering This proposal includes 1.00 move-in(s); each additional move-in will be $ 2000.0 o We have estimated the work wlll require approxlmately 2 working day(s). If you have any auestions or requlre additional information, please contact elther myself or Larry Simons. Danny Sl Generaì Accepted: -/ ,. 8y: ,~ 1J1~ /~'L 11. Tit 1 e :0__ -7 /1/1" tiÀAr Date: (l- 7 -C¡t( CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1 Department: Public Works Award Bid on Walkers Branch Channel and Subject: Paving Improvements, Phase I Council Meeting Date: 9/12/94 Agenda Number: PW 94-31 Bids were received on this 1985 CIP bond project on August 30, 1994 and the low bidders are as shown below. Ridder Larry H. Jackson Humphrey & Morton Thomco A mOllnt $514,445.25 $527,977.36 $559,921.90 r.alendM nay Rid Time 175 270 190 The proposed construction schedule for the low bidder is summarized below. -Council A ward Bid - Pre Construction Conference -Begin Utility Adjustments (Lone Star Gas & TU Electric) Intersection partially closed. -Contractor begins project construction. Intersection completely closed. -Construction ends and intersection reopened. 9/12/94 9/23/94 10/3/94 10/24/94 5/01195 Fllndine SOllrce: Budget Additional (PW 91-07) Revised Rlldeet Fllndine Reqllirf>n Engineering: General CIP $40,000 $45,000 $ 5,000 Utility CIP 0 10,000 10,000 Total Engineering $40,000 $55,000 $15,000 Construction: General CIP $503,800 $409,985 ($93,815) Utility CIP 77,700 104,4hl 2h,7hl Total Construction $581,500 $514,446 ($67,054) Right-of-Way: General CIP $10,000 $ 5,000 ($ 5,000) Utility CIP 0 0 0 Total ROW $10,000 $ 5,000 ($ 5,000) Total Project Funding: General CIP $553,800 $459,985 ($93,815) Utility CIP 77,700 114,4hl 1h,7hl Total $631,500 $574,446 ($57,054 ) Finance Review Fln..ce Director Page 1 of The additional $36,761 needed for the water and sewer adjustments on this project can be appropriated from the Utility Fund Reserves. Rprommencl~tion : Staff recommends Council award the bid to Larry H. Jackson Construction, Inc. in the amount of $514,445.25 to be completed in 175 calendar days and approve the transfer of funds as indicated above. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . . KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSUL flNL lNCINlfRS ! fort Worth- Dallas August 31, 1994 I ,---' ,-' '03 0 \\(j' r ; .", r, !, ~ I ,-~ I c;¡ \ \. / I::J , ' !; ;iL'~'-- \::7 L'-::i .:..J -'-=-1:: ': '~I SEP 1994 I~¡ Honorable Mayor and City Council 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-354, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WALKERS BRANCH CHANNEL AND PA VING IMPROVEMENTS TABULA TION OF BIDS Bids were received on August 30, 1994, for the referenced project, and proposals were submitted from nine (9) general contractors. A detailed bid tabulation is available for your information. The following is a summary of the bids: . CONTRACTOR DAYS PAVING DRAINAGE WATER SEWER TOTAL BID 1 Larry H Jackson 175 $114,462.85 $295,522.15 $63,171.00 $41,289.25 $514,445.25 2. Humphrey & Morton 270 122,953.81 280,697.39 75,507.76 48,818.40 527,977.36 3. Thomco 190 101,436.50 347,089.00 66,383.00 45,013.40 559,921.90 4. Mike Albert 180 141 ,755.15 305,672.95 69,421.00 47,431.00 564,280.10 5. Orval Hall 200 136,202.29 341,208.89 64,482.60 38,124.50 580,018.28 6. Jeske Const. 250 98,460.06 380,380.40 75,248.60 48,880.30 602,969.36 7 Rebcon 270 129,232.91 364,026.75 68,963.20 46,207.00 608,429.88 8 M.A Vinson 280 148,600.95 355,694.41 74,903.40 48,625.60 627,824.38 9. Ashlar Contr. 240 178,916.50 361,665.80 84,355.95 56,539.05 681,477.30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ............ ............ . , . . - . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. ......... ... .. ... . . . . ._,- This project includes concrete channel liner improvements on the Walkers Branch Channel from the proposed Watauga Road (East) project north right-of-way line to a short distance north of Cardinal Lane. Also included is reconstruction of the Cardinal Lane/Martin Drive intersection, a new 5-1O'x7' box culvert under Cardinal Lane, and associated water and sanitary sewer adjustments. . The low bidder, Larry H. Jackson Construction, Inc., has recently complete other projects in North Richland Hills including the Timberhill Drainage Improvements, the Woods Lane Drainage Improvements project, and the North Forty/Greenwood Way drainage project. This contractor has performed well on all of these projects. 1901 CENTRAL DR.. SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO 817/267-3367 . FAX 817/354-4389 . . . Page 2 August 31, 1994 Walker's Branch, Phase I, Channel and Paving Improvements Bid Tabulations and Recommendation of Contract A ward Based on the bids received, and in the absence of any negative reports concerning the low bidder, we would recommend contract award to Larry H. Jackson Construction, Inc., 5112 Sun Valley Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76119, in the total amount of $514,445.25, for a period of 175 Calendar Days We will be available at the September 12, 1994, Council meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. ~úJ,~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RW A/ra/Enclosures/Bids.354 xc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Deputy City Manager Mr. Randy Shiflet, Assistant City Manager Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works Mr. Larry Cunningham, Director of Finance Mr. Mark Bradley, R.O.W. Agent Mr. Jimmy Cates, Street Superintendent Mr. Larry Jones, Water and Sewer Superintendent Messrs. Ken Matheson, Bill Rutledge, Fred Durko, City Inspectors CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 3· 3S~ (a.) . GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUND Project Summary Sheet PROJECT: WALKER'S BRANCH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE I DESCRIPTION: Construct a 5-10'x7' multiple reinforced concrete box culvert with access ramp at Cardinal Lane. Install some 40-foot bottom reinforced concrete trapezoidal channel liner upstream and downstream of the culvert at Cardinal Lane. The south end of the liner will extend to the future Watauga Road extension by the State. Approximate total project length including the proposed culvert at Cardinal Lane is 600 feet. JUSTIFICATION: This project is the first phase of the Walker's Branch Channel improvements outlined in the voter approved 1985 General Obligation Bond Election. ESTIMATED COST: $553,800 LOW BID, LARRY H. JACKSON: $514,445.25 FUNDING SOURCE: G.O. Bonds . LOCATION: .. 81 a: .,. ac I \ '. ,.. ft.. ,1 ~ 1·.~1:i ,. ".II t,7 ac .. ,. ".. I," ac , . TII CI I ("IIIIIIU, ¡, .'"'1 ~C."fll III ,".,. .. .,.... ,.. lac J toe £ -$1~1I14~ ~ -- . PROPOSED WALKER'S BRANCH IMPROVEMENTS FROM CARDINAL LANE TO WA T AUGA ROAD <EAST> ;¥ I :~ =- ,a t '" ,Slac ...... - -- .. ...... ,,.,. : 'a .&, (' :: 7~ .c _ ..~ ~~ "'lie ::111 - t L::J ............ . .., --... r:.:::I MI__.'." ....... ....... CAAOINAl l' --- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 9/12/94 Approve Final Pay Estimate No.2 in the amount of $22,927 Rl to JRT Pavine, Tnc. for 1994 Mi<\œllan~oll<\ Agenda Number: PAY 94-21 Street Subgrade and Surface Reconstruction Subject: On May 23, 1994 , PU 94-40, Council awarded to JRJ Paving, Inc. the 1994 Miscellaneous Street Subgrade and Surface Reconstruction project. The total contract amount after change orders is $38,325.70. The project is now complete, with all final adjustments having been made. Fllnclin~ SOllrc.~: Public Works Operating Budget. Rec.omm~nclation : It is recommended that Council approve final payment in the amount of $22,927.81 to JRJ Paving, Inc. for 1994 Miscellaneous Street Subgrade and Surface Reconstruction. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot r Acct. Number Sufficien Funds Available An..c:e Director Page 1 of , .JR.J . (214) 869-2971 PA VINCI. INC. P.O. Box 59934 11332 Mathis St. Suite 100 Dallas. TX 75229 * * * I N V 0 ICE * * * (?\>'?? :ITY OF NORTH RICHLAND '301 N.E. LOOP 820 , . () . BOX 820609 tORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76182 Ii'IVOICE ** EST II'1ATE W ESTIMATE PERIOD CONTRACT AMOUNT F.:ET A I I-IAGE 8173 PAGE :!. HI LU3 ..., L. 7/30/94 TO 8/30/94 $38~326 10~..: fOB 94092 1994 STREET RECONSTRUCTION . EXCAVATION UNITS COMPLETED/ PLAN UNIT ESTIMATED EARI-IED QUANTITY UI-IIT PRICE THIS MOf'.rn-1 TO DATE 72~~ . 000 CY 5. 6~jO 361.000 722.000 2039.1.>5 4079.30 8195.000 SY 2.500 5632.000 8195.000 14080.00 20487.50 131.000 TO 83.000 90.000 131.000 7470.00 10873.00 1.000 LS 1000.000 1.000 1000.00 218.000 CY 8.650 ~~18. 000 218.000 188~1.. 70 1885.70 TEM DESCRIPTION u LIME STABILIZATION ) . HYDRATED LIME . . 1'10BILIZATION . EXCAVATION - BELLHURST CT. . .JR.J . (214) 869-2971 PA VINGI. INC. P.O. Box 59934 11332 Mathis St.. Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75229 * * * I N V 0 ICE * * * ',:;'<.:>99 ~ITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1301 N.E. LOOP 820 ~. . o. BOX 820609 ~ORTH RICHLAND HILLS~ TEXAS 76182 H-IVOICE H ESTII'1ATE H ESTHIATE PEFUOD CONTRACT AI'IOUNT F\ETAI"IAGE 8:1.73 PN3E :? r, .:. 7/30/94 TO 8/30/94 $38 ~ ~526 10~'~ JOB 94092 1994 STREET RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATED EARNED AMOUI'-ITS 1'1-1 H~ t'10NTH . Al'1OUf'HS TO DATE TOTAL AMOUNT OF WORK DONE 25!.475.35 38, :~25.. 5() LESS RETAINAGE 2~547.54 3,832. ~)~:I AMOUNT DUE ESTIMATE H '".' <- 22 ~ 'J27. 81 3'-t ~ 492.95 . LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 11~565.13 UNPAID BILLINGS AS OF 7/30/94 .01 .01 ::::~R:~T:: A:2;~:::_::::::::_____ DATE --------------- 22~927.82 22 ~ 927 . 8~~ PAY THIS AMO~"T FOR ESTIMATE '"' .:. ***************** * * * 22,927.81 * * * ***************** . I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 2 in the Amount of Subject: $3,837.22 to Shawn Mackey Construction Company Agenda Number: for Holiday Heights Elementary School Northwest Parking Lot 9/12/94 PAY 94-22 Previous action by Council on July 25, 1994 in PW 94-27 ratified the contract with Shawn Mackey for the construction of the reinforced concrete parking lot with drive approach to Lola Drive for $25,185. During the construction staking for the parking lot, Birdville Independent School District (BISD) officials requested that the parking lot layout be revised. BISD representatives were concerned that the existing layout would cause the south edge of the parking lot to be too close to their pecan trees. The revised layout decreased some quantities, and increased others. The result was a net increase of the project cost of $396.50, or a total cost of $25,581.50. A summary of the overall construction cost incurred for the construction of this project is shown below. Shawn Mackey Const. (concrete work) Goode Const. Co. (dirt work) City Crews (Lola- Dr. dropoff lane, traffic buttons) Total Construction Cost $25,581.50 4,750.00 1 } 19R :)0 $11 "10 00 Fnncline Source: Sufficient funds were appropriated by Council in PW 94-27, on July 25, 1994. Rf>£ommenclatinn: It is recommended Council approve final payment to Shawn Mackey Construction Company for $3,837.22. Finance Review . nature CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM FlMllce Dlnlctor Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ h Page 1 of ~ REET & NO. SHIPPED TO City of ·..NRH STREET & NO 5221 Susan Lee Lane STATE ZIP CITY ·13732 SHAWN MACKEY 4613 Patterson Ln. Colleyville, Texas 76034 VIA CITY STATE ZIP CUSTOMER'S ORDER I SALESMAN I TERMS I F.O.S, I DATE 8-19-94 I Tota~ Description Quantitv Unit: I 1 1. Conc. Pavement 5" thick 866.14 SY H~ . 00 15590.52 2. New 6" Curb 431.00 I I LF 7.00 30171.00 3. Conc. Driveway 5" thick 1.00 EA i I 1900.00 1900.00 ~ I 4. Conc. Sidewalk 4" thick 1150.00 SF .,85 212'l¡.50 I I 5. Remove Existing Sidewalk 150.00 SF ~.OO 30~.00 I 1 6. Saw Cut Existing Pavement 53.00 LF 11.00 531.00 Flume (4' wide w 6" curb) I I 7. Conc. 1.00 EA 14841.00 14841.00 I 8. Wheel Chair Ramps (complete) 2.00 EA 25q.00 500:.00 *Backfill I I 9. 1.00 EA 6090.48 60g,.48 I I I I TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROJECT $25,581.50 I I I I First Payment Received $21,744.28 , , I I I I Final Payment Amount Due : I I $383~.22 T 8740 INVOICE . INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 94-129 . ~ September 8, 1994 T :::~~ct: Attached letter from Ms. Mickey Margetis On August 26, 1994, Building Inspection staff observed building construction activity at 8133 Precinct Line Road and stopped to investigate. After determining that no building permit had been issued, a red tag was left advising the property owner to contact the Building Official. That afternoon, Ms. Mickey Margetis and her son came by city hall in response to the stop work order placed on the structure and visited with Steve Pence and Barry LeBaron. e Mr. Margetis explained that his mother had recently purchased the five acre tract which included an old home in a serious stage of deterioration. Mr. Margetis indicated that back in July he had contacted the City of Hurst and asked if he needed a building permit to just replace a few rotted boards. He stated that the City of Hurst told him that no building permit was required, just asked for a decking inspection when he was finsished with the work. He also stated that he had contacted Tom Riney, (NRH Building Inspector) and asked whether or not the house was condemned before he purchased the property. He stated that he was advised by Mr. Tom Riney that the house was not condemned. Mr. Margetis stated that he asked Mr. Riney if it was all right for him to make some renovations to the structure. He stated that Mr. Riney advised him that he would be doing the city a favor by fixing up the old house, since it was an eyesore. Mr. Riney has been asked about this conversation and he stated that he has never talked with anyone about the old house on Precinct Line Road, and doubted that he would advise someone to renovate an old house without first getting a building permit. Shortly after the property was purchased by Ms. Margetis on July 7, 1994, she employed a subcontractor to renovate the old house so it could be used for her residence. The exterior walls had been removed, new wall studs and new rafters installed and an area of the floor had been covered with plywood decking. During their office visit with Steve Pence and Barry LeBaron, Ms. Margetis was informed that the house had been targeted for demolition by the City and that the previous property owner had been notified of the demolition order. Mr. Margetis stated that he was not made aware of the demolition order by either the previous owner or the mortgage holder. . The North Richland Hills Building Board of Appeals had ordered the demolition of this structure at the July 1993 meeting. A notice advising the public of the demolition order was nailed to the exterior of the structure as required by city regulations and state law (a picture of the notice is included with the file on this property). The property owner at that time and the lending institution which held the mortgage on the property were notified of the meeting of the Building Board of Appeals, but did not attend. The property owner and the lending institution were also sent a copy of the demolition order authorized by the Building Board of Appeals. The estimated cost of ... ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS. TEXAS . . . scheduled for demolition due to the uncertainty of the effect of the future widening of Precinct Line Road. Summation: The staff has no problem with allowing the house in question to be renovated, provided the work is covered by a building permit and is performed in accordance with the city code requirements. Normally, platting of the property would be required before issuing such a permit, but the platting requirement could be waived provided proof can be shown of the availability of water and septic tank service; and further provided that Ms. Margetis is willing to dedicate for public use the 30 foot strip of right-of-way that will be required for widening of Precinct Line Road. Otherwise, it will be necessary for Tarrant County to purchase this right-of-way. Respecfully submitted, /?t1/!~ Rodger Line, City Manager ~. I I . . September 6, 1994 City Council Nor~h R~chland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 RE: 8133 Precinct Line Road I hereby request permission to appear before the City Council at its meeting next Monday, September 12th. On July 7, 1994 I purchased property located at 8133 Precinct Line Road. At no time was I ever informed that the property had been condemned. I even called the City of North Richland Hills and verified that the property was not condemned. I have spent an enormous amount of money restoring this property and now am informed that the property is condemned. I had been told that all I needed was a decking inspection. Mr. Rodger Line suggested that I appear before the City Council and discuss my problem. Sincerely, /111.4 PJ< -'ÌY\+ Mickey K. Margetis