The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1995-12-11 Agendas CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 11,1995 - 6:15 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. ~BER ITEM ACTION~ 1. GN 95-152 NRH20 Report and Recommendations (Agenda Item No. 17) (15 Minutes) 2. GN 95-151 Little Bear Creek Flood Plain Management - Ordinance No. 2091 (Agenda Item No. 16) (15 Minutes) 3. IR 95-143 Community Development Block Grant Submittal (CDBG) - 22nd Year (5 Minutes) 4. IR 95-144 Laidlaw Request for Rate Increase (10 Minutes) 5. PU 95-81 Award of Bid for Layout and Printing of City Newsletter (Agenda Item No. 24) (5 Minutes) 6. IR 95-142 Professional Services for Girls Fast Pitch Softball Complex (5 Minutes) 7. Other Items Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 8. *Executive Session (10 Minutes) - The Council may enter into closed executive session to discuss the following: A. Consultation with attorney under Gov. Code §551.071 : Consider WatauQa vs. NRH 9. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 11,1995 For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. 1. Items marked with an * are on the consent agenda and will be voted on in one motion unless a Council Member asks for separate discussion. 2. The Council reserves the right to retire into executive session concerning any of the items listed on this Agenda, whenever it is considered necessary and legally justified under the Open Meetings Act. 3. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need assistance should contact the City Secretary's office at 581-5502 two working days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting November 13, 1995 5. Minutes of the Special Meeting November 20, 1995 6. Presentations by Boards & Commissions Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 8. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19,20, 21,22,23,25,26,28,29,30,31,32, 33, 35 & 36) 9. PZ 95-18 Public Hearing to Consider an Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 1874 Regarding Concrete or Asphalt Paved Parking Areas - Ordinance No. 2069 *10. GN 95-145 Authorized Signatures for Pledgee Signature Authorization Form - Resolution No. 95-61 *11. GN 95-146 Authorized Investment Officers - Resolution No. 95-62 *12. GN 95-147 Amending Authorized Investment Officers List for T expool - Resolution No. 95-63 *13. GN 95-148 Intent to Reimburse Expenditures with Proceeds of Future Debt- Resolution No. 95-64 Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *14. GN 95-149 Designation of the Fort Worth Star Telegram as the "Official City Newspaper" - Resolution No. 95-60 15. GN 95-150 Consideration of a Request to Change the Name of Parkman Drive to Rogers Drive - Ordinance No. 2090 16. GN 95-151 Little Bear Creek Flood Plain Management - Ordinance No. 2091 17. GN 95-152 NRH20 Report and Recommendations 18. GN 95-153 Appointment to Planning & Zoning Commission and Capital Improvement Advisory Committee *19. PU 95-76 Award Annual Contract for Letterhead and Envelopes *20. PU 95-77 Authorize Purchase of Tractor with Loader *21. PU 95-78 Award Bid for Library Lighting Modifications, Phase II . Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *22. PU 95-79 Request from Hudiburg Chevrolet to Withdraw Bid *23. PU 95-80 Award Bid for 1996 Vehicles 24. PU 95-81 Award of Bid for Layout and Printing of City Newsletter *25. PU 95-82 Authorize Purchase of Motorola Radios for Police Department and Fire Department *26. PU 95-83 Award Bid for Flatbed Trailers 27. PU 95-84 Award Bid for Repair of the College Hills Trinity Water Well *28. PU 95-85 Reject Bid for 1995 Loader From AIS Continental and Award Bid to Future Equipment Company *29. PW 95-74 Ratify Agreement with Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. For Signalization Improvements for Holiday Lane at Mid-Cities Boulevard *30. PW 95-75 Ratify Right-of-Way Acquisitions for Rufe Snow Drive Reconstruction - Onyx Drive North to Glenview Drive NUMBER *31. PW 95-76 *32. PW 95-77 *33. PW 95-78 34. PW 95-79 *35. PAY 95-22 *36. PAY 95-23 37. 38. '- ITEM Approve Budget for Installation of Street Lights on Rodger Line Drive Approve Budget for the Installation of Street Lights on Mid-Cities Boulevard Approve 1995/96 City Street Overlay Program Approve Professional Services Budget for Little Bear Creek Flood Study Approve Final Pay Estimate NO.4 in the Amount of $14,991.19 to JRJ Paving, Inc. For Holiday heights Elementary School Traffic Safety 1m provements Approve Final Pay Estimate NO.5 in the Amount of $10,132.67 to M.A. Vinson Construction Co., Inc. For Holiday Lane, Section B - Curb and Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements Citizens Presentation Page 5 ACTION TAKEN POSTED /;;. -!qs Date -----,. J~ 4'.5 Om l¡m~õ Adjournment C'" c' Byí2lh;~ ~---"'._--- INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 95-140 '~ ~ Date: ~ Subject: Wednesday, December 6, 1995 Update on Condition of Richland Plaza In September, Scott Welmaker and I spent some time, with John Staples (President of Staples Management & Investments, Inc.) discussing Richland Plaza. Mr. Staples manages Richland Plaza and had begun to research options for improving its facilities. I called Mr. Staples yesterday for an update. He is putting together the financial numbers and plans to submit a redevelopment plan to the own.er's representative (Henry R. Pearson of H. Pearson & Co. Certified Public Accountants, Dallas) by the end of December. I thought you would appreciate learning what he tentatively plans to propose: · Since Mr. Staples has received inquiries in recent weeks for 5-7,000 sq. ft. spaces, he will recommend partial conversion (40,000 of a total 120,000 sq. ft.) of the fonner Tandy Electronics space into such sizes. If this approach leads to some new leases, he will recommend redeveloping the remaining industrial space in similar increments. By the way, conversion will include replacing the bay wells (which unfortunately provide a place for water to collect) with at-grade bay doors. · He will suggest that the owner patch existing holes in the parking lot (especially where it fronts Grapevine Highway) and plan to do overlays when additional revenues are available. · Mr. Staples will continue to pursue demolition of the Richland Plaza water tower. Thusfar, he has been unable to find anyone who would be interested in removing the tower in exchange for its scrap metal. Nevertheless, he plans to contact the owners of Decker Metals (an Alvarado-based water tank/tower demolition company) and determine their interest. We will continue to brief you on Richland Plaza improvemelJts as we learn about them. In the meantime, please call me (581-5534) at your convenience if you have any questions or wish to dis~HsS this is~ue in greater detail. ,- Marty ieder Director of Economic Development MBW "-- ISSUED BYTHE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 95-143 ~ Date: -r Subject: December 11, 1995 '-- Community Development Block Grant Submittal (CDBG)- 22nd Year The application for the 22nd Year Community Development Block Grant (CDGB) is due February 15, 1996. CDGB funds available for the 22nd year are expected to be about $120,000. These funds may be requested for Senior Citizen Centers, Parks or projects such as Drainage and Street Reconstruction in Target Areas. These funds have been applied to the two Senior Citizen Centers for the last several years. Staff requests direction for grant submission for 22nd year funding and offers the following as options for City Council consideration: 1) Parking area and playground adjacent to Dan Echols Center on BISD property. 2) Street reconstruction in Target Areas. Specific street recommendations and estimated costs for both recommendations can be provided in January. "'--- We will be requesting that Tarrant County re-evaluate our target areas for possible inclusion of the North Park Estates Edition (north of Mid-Cities Blvd. & east of Rufe Snow Dr.) for 23rd Year consideration. This area has several streets that need repairs and other household painting and repair projects that could be eligible for funding. Respectfully, ~C~ Randy Shiflet Assistant City Manager ISSUED BYTHE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 95-144 ',-- ~ Date December 11, 1995 -r SUb¡:CI: Laidlaw Request for Rate Increase On September 29, 1995, Laidlaw Waste Systems notified the City of its request to increase garbage collection rates primarily because of disposal costs increases. They requested a 67 ¢ per month increase for residential rates and increases from 5%% to 11.1 % for commercial customers. Upon receiving this, I asked our Finance Department to evaluate the request and provide recommendations. Attached is a detailed report by Charles Harris, Finance Director. Our current Franchise Agreement with Laidlaw indicates that rates can be adjusted by 85% of the CPI on an annual basis and any other increases can be made only if costs are caused by Federal or State mandates. While we do not doubt that costs for Laidlaw have increased because of mandated issues related to landfill and other disposal costs, it is extremely difficult to quantify the impact of the mandated cost increases to Laidlaw's North Richland Hills' operation. To do an accurate analysis the City would need to conduct an independent rate study analysis. As a practical matter, the time, expense, and industry specific expertise necessary to conduct this analysis effectively prohibits such an undertaking. Because of this we have looked at an alternative method of evaluating the rates and need for increases. As pointed out in Charles Harris' memorandum, we have looked at an option of dividing the current garbage service rates into one that shows 70% of the base rate being attributable to operational/ collection costs and the remaining 30% attributable to disposal costs. The disposal "- costs would be increased by an index equivalent to the annual percentage increase of the average compacted gate rates of a group of area landfills. The collection costs for operations would be adjusted annually by an index defined to be 85% ofthe annual increase in CPI. Using this approach a 50¢ per month increase for residential customers and 7.6% for commercial could be justified. We believe that this alternative method appears to be a more reasonable approach to considering rate adjustments during the contract period and it would be our thought to use this approach and modify our Franchise Agreement accordingly. This would not include extending the contract terms. We recommend that Council approve the following: 1. Revise the existing Franchise Agreement to delete the mandated cost provisions and include the 70/30 approach as mentioned above. 2. Approve a 50¢ increase in residential rates and rate increases for commercial customers according to the 70/30 model effective for the January, 1996 billing cycles. 3. Delete free landfill days and accept the offer of Laidlaw that bulky and brush items be collected on regular pick up days. '''"-- If these are acceptable to Council, we will bring an action item for the January 8 Council meeting. ~~IIY ubmitted, ~~n ~ City Manager ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MEMO TO: C.A. Sanford, City Manager FROM: Charles Harris, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Laidlaw's Request for Rate Increase and Contract Revision DATE: December 1, 1995 Laidlaw Waste Systems has requested that the City consider an increase in garbage rates. In October of 1994, Laidlaw requested a rate increase to offset costs described as the result of: 1) an increase in general operating costs, and 2) various mandated disposal cost increases. Staff verified the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase which by contract, is the index upon which operational cost increases are to be measured. Council approved this portion of the request, effective January, 1 1995. During the ensuing months, Laidlaw has continued to provide staff with a variety of information supporting their request for an increase stemming from costs directly attributable to regulatory mandates effecting disposal activities. In late September of this year, Laidlaw submitted a formal request for rate adjustment amounting to $.67 (8% increase) per month for regular residential customers and a commercial rate increase of between 5.5% and 11.1 %, depending upon volume and frequency. (See Exhibit A - Laidlaw request.) In summary, this data supports industry wide cost escalations attributable to mandated regulatory issues. Unfortunately, this data is not in a format that would allow the staff to quantify or verify the specific magnitude of the impact. While persuasive evidence of mandated cost increases exists, quantifying this impact in terms of timing or dollars does not appear practical. In order to be verifiable, the data would need to be both independently audited and applicable to Laidlaw's North Richland Hills operation. Although some of Laidlaw's data is gathered on a local basis, much of the firm's costs are gathered on a more regional level. Lacking this data, the City would need to conduct an independent rate study analysis. As a practical matter, the time, expense and industry specific expertise necessary to conduct this analysis effectively prohibit such an undertaking. Furthermore, these same limitations are likely to hinder any equitable solution to the "mandated cost" issue for the duration of the current contract. In an effort to resolve the current problem of quantifying regulatory costs, the staff and Laidlaw have pursued an alternative solution which 1) provides Laidlaw an equitable level of relief pursuant to cost increases created by regulatory mandates and 2) relies on a methodology which the staff can verify using reasonable efforts and available criteria. Most mandated costs appear to relate to disposal activities and conversely, the majority of disposal cost increases result from mandated costs. Therefore, a reasonable and equitable solution appears to involve correlation of one or more verifiable indices with an increase in disposal costs. This general premise is an existing component of the current contract. Specifically, the current contract provides a methodology by which operating cost increases may be recovered by increasing rates based on an agreed upon factor of CPI. Under this alternative methodology, the average increase in compacted landfill disposal rates has been defined as a representative and reflective index of disposal costs (much as CPI increases reflect operational cost increases). Periodically, the total rate which includes components for operational costs as well as disposal costs would be adjusted to reflect both changes in the CPI and the average of area landfill costs. By definition, 70% of the total base rate would be attributable to operational/collection costs. The remaining 30% would be defined as attributable to disposal costs. The component of the rate attributable to operations would be adjusted annually by an index defined to be 85% of the annual increase in CPI. The disposal component increase would be increased by an index equal to the annual percent increase of the average compacted gate rates of a mutually agreed upon group of area landfills. (See Exhibit B for an example of a hypothetical application of the proposed rate adjustment methodology.) At the initial transition to the proposed methodology disposal cost increases would be computed using an average increase in area landfill gate rates for a period spanning September of 1993 until November of 1995. Laidlaw's last disposal rate increase was granted in February of 1993. Operational cost increases would be would be measured by computing the applicable CPI increase over a period spanning August 1994 to August 1995. Subsequent increases in both components would be calculated on an annual basis measured from August to August. Preliminary calculations indicate that the application of this methodology would result in an increase of $0.50 for regular service and $0.79 for backdoor service. This represents an increase of 5.9% and 6.3% respectively. Seniors' costs would increase by an equivalent amount but the percentages are slightly higher due to the fact that their total rate is somewhat less. Commercial increases amount to about 7.6%. These figures are somewhat lower than the rates most recently requested by Laidlaw, but we believe our rates are reasonable and fair. (See Exhibit C for the specific computations of these amounts. Also refer to Exhibit D for a comparison of rates of local cities.) In addition to the revision in the computational methods described, Laidlaw has offered to revise the contract such that brush and bulky items would be collected on regular pick up days in lieu of the current practice of allowing a limited number of free landfill days. (See Exhibit E) Note that the component of the rate attributable to recycling costs is not addressed by either the CPI or landfill rate indices, nor has Laidlaw expressed a need to revise recycling rates. Still, an equitable and verifiable method of assessing rate adjustments for this final component of the total rate is probably desirable. However, neither CPI nor disposal cost fluctuations are likely to correlate with fluctuations in recycling cost activities. The staff will continue to explore alternatives which would allow recycling rates to be evaluated on a basis that is verifiable by reasonable efforts. Hopefully, we will be able to identify and agree upon such a methodology by the time Council is requested to amend the existing contract. Respectfully submitted, Charles Harris Director of Finance EXHIBIT A (!J SSDsese' LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS INC. September 29, 1995 Mr. C.A. Sanford City Manager City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 RE: Solid Waste Rate Adjustment Request Dear C.A.: As you know, Laidlaw Waste Systems requested a rate adjustment last year to compensate the c,?mpany for increases in disposal costs as well as the anÍmal CPI ,adjustment. After review of the request, the City Council acted on the CPI pomon of the reque~t, but not the disposal portion. Since that time, our landfill on Mi~s Drive has closed and we have purchaséd another in Johnson County. We have also extended our ,'disposal agreement at Sanlfill Crow Landfill near Azle to the end of the life of that landfill. We have also opened a Trånsfer ~tationflvfaterials Reco~ery Facility for rollofflindustrialloads at our operating facIlity on Elliott Reeder. While sum of these ·actions have assured us that we wi~l have disposal capacity to'meet our contractual obligations, they have done nothing to reduce,~e cost of disposal, and in fact, the clo~ure of the Fort Worth landfill has impacted our collection and hauling costs in a substantial ,'. manner.· Because of these cost inc~eases, in both disposal and collecrionlhauling, we have ' experienced sigriificant erosiori in our margins and in fact are currently losing money in . our residential collection operations. We are requesting that the City Staff and Council review the attac~ed docwnentåtion for rate adjustment, and approve the proposed changes in rates as soon as possible. Since this is a very complex contråct, with ìnterrelated operations,' niy staff and I will ptovide whatever further documentation and support you may need to justify this ráte , adjustment request. As you know, we'próvide commercial FEL collection, industrial' relloff collection, arid residentiál solid waste and recycling collection to your city. 1 believe that the best way to evaluate the cost basis of this business and franchise is to . s'eparate the services and costs into either per load, per home, or per lift (container) costs and then add a reasonable margin and franchise fees to the costs. Based upon our 6100 ELLIOTT REEDER ROAD, FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76117. (817) 332-7301 . Fax (817) 831-2020 Customer Servir." F::I" 1~171 Q"'_7.A~O ~ EXHIBIT A :§ Ø8g000cr Page Two Solid Waste Rate Adjustment Request- investigation and analysis, the Commercial FEL business is profitable and may not need to be adjusted.substantialIY.The rolIoff business is marginal and the haul rate must be adjusted to compensate for the longer haul dis~ce to Sanifill if we are to haul directly there. There 'ml1 be an offsetting reduction in disposal costs Jor rolloff since the disposal cost at ~e låndfill is lowe: than·th~ disposal cost at the Transfer StåtionJrvfaterials . Recovery Facility on Elliott Reeder. The residential recycling and processing business is retUrning an adequate margin and mll only get better if the recycled materials markets stabilize. The re.sidential collection'busin~ss, however, is losing very substantial amounts of money. This business has suffered the double whammy ofhigher.disposal costs and . longer hauling distances over the past years. Because of this, residential rates must be . increased·subs.tantially or the type of service offered must be modified to reduce costs.' We,haye given this a lot of thought and have some ideas on how we can restructure the residential'collectio,Il service to reduce the cost of providing the service while at the. same time enhancing the :v~ue provided. J look forward to meeting mth you in the" near future to discuss this rate adjustment ' request and our {deas for improving the services we provide you. Either Doug or r Will be 'in contact mth you·mthin the next week to set an appointment to discuss this situation. Sincerely, , LAID LA W·W ASTE SYSTEMS, INe. Joseph Nooflag Market General. Manager . Dàllas/F ort Worth .f!ý.'ctl0929a ' , , . ~~ EXHIBIT A Q SUMMARY OF NORTH RJCHLAND HILLS RATE INCREASE REQUEST COMMERCIAL IMPACT OF DISPOSAL INCREASE IMPACT OF HAULING INCREASE FY 1995 Disposal $ 234,472 Number of loads 1487 FY 1995 Rate S 4.85 Time Differential (mins) 20 FY 1995 Yardage 48,345 Additional Operating Hours 495.67 Disposal Rate at Last Adjustment S 4.00 Cost per Operating Hour $ 88.06 Disposal Cost S 193,379 Cost Increase Annually $43,648 Unreimbursed Disposal Cost $ 41,093 loose Container Ydge - FY 1995 388,055 Loose Container Yardage 388,055 Cost Increase per Yard S 0.106 Cost Increase per Yard S 0.112 Franchise Fee Gross Up 7" 0.92 Franchise Fee Gross Up ~ 0.92 Adjusted Cost Increase per Yard S 0.115 Adjusted Cost Increase per Yard $ 0.122 Total Commercial Increase per Yard $ 0.237 RESIDENTIAL IMPACT OF DISPOSAL INCREASE IMPACT OF HAULING INCREASE FY 1995 Disposal $ 303,703 Number of Loads 2577 FY 1995 Rate S 4.85 Time Differential (mins) 20 FY 1995 Yardage 62,619 Additional Operating Hours 859 DispoS<J1 Rate at Last Adjustment $ 4.00 Cost per Operating Hour S 51.62 Disposal Cost $ 250,4 77 Cost Increase Annually $44,342 Unreimbursed Disposal Cost / Yr $ 53,226 Number of Units Serviced / Yr 178,308 Number of Units Serviced / Yr 178,308 Cost Increase per Unit / Yr $ 0.30 Cost Increase per Unit / Yr S 0.25 Franchise Fee Gross Up -7- 0.88 Franchise Fee Gross Up . 0.88 . Adjusted Cost Increase per Unit / Yr $ 0.34 Adjusted Cost Increase per Unit / Yr $ 0.28 Total Residential Increase per Month $ 0.62 + ~,[e" -p.:<. ,0£ ioio.\ r'"'C.~ O·~7 Ltf- Confidential 10/10/95 Page 1 EXHIBIT B PROPOSED RATE ADJUSTMENT METHODOLOGY (Hypothetical values - selected for simplicity of computation) Total Operations Disposal Rate Allocation Allocation Beginning total base I current rate: $10.00 Allocation of base rate to operations (70%) $7.00 Allocation of base rate to disposal (30%) $3.00 CPI index =.10 (See Table A) Disposal cost index =.10 (See Table B) Operational rate increase ($7.00 x.1 = $.70) 0.70 0.70 Disposal rate increase ($3.00 x.1 = $.30) 0.30 0.30 Enqing total bétse / current rate: $11.00 $7.70 $3.30 Table A - CPI Adjustment !CPI August 19X1 ¡CPI August 19X2 Percent Change ,Percent Chan ex .85 100.0 111.8 11.80% 10.00% Table B - Disposal Adjustment Percent Increase August August of Average 19X1 19X2 Rate Gate Rate Landfill A $10.00 $11.50 Gate Rate Landfill B 8.00 9.00 Gate Rate Landfill C 12.00 12.00 Gate Rate Landfill D 11.50 12.50 Gate Rate Landfill E 7.50 8.00 Gate Rate Landfill F 11.00 13.00 Average Gate Rate $10.00 $11.00 10.00% I I Exhibit C Residential Garbage Rate Comparison for the City of North Richland Hills Base Garbage Fee $6.10 $6.56 $0.46 Recycling Fee $1.69 $1.69 $0.00 0.0% Sales Tax remitted to State $0.60 $0.64 $0.04 5.9% Total $8.39 $8.89 $0.50 5.9% Backdoor Garbage Service $9.63 $10.36 $0.73 7.6% RecyclinQ $1.91 $1.91 $0.00 0.0% Sales Tax remitted to State $0.89 $0.95 $0.06 6.3% Total $12.43 $13.22 $0.79 6.3% '$ ;Ðiif¡iiæl?~èêtçeijtà;·,,¡; Base Garba e Fee $6.56 $0.46 7.5% $0.90 $0.00 0.0% $0.58 $0.04 6.6% $8.04 $0.50 6.6% Total Backdoor Garbage Service $9.63 $10.36 $0.73 7.6% Recycling $0.90 $0.90 $0.00 0.0% Sales Tax remitted to State $0.82 $0.87 $0.06 6.9% Total $11.35 $12.13 $0.79 6.9% utility\nrhllrat( c). wk3 12/07/95 c o fA .¡: C'CS Q, E II) o;f 0" c:: So!! C'CS~ ~ .~ ü"a:: .... C'CS ~ ;g 0 1::= ~...J~ ill I ..... 1:0 O~ s.. .- u.U _eÞ .! :5 u ... s...E C2) E E o o '#. ~ '#. ~ '#. 0 0 CD CD CD CD CD " " " " " "t:' <Ov(')mo Q) ~~~~~ I/) f'..mvvm ~ .~ OIO-.-CDv Q) "'-...-NN(') Q) e ~ .... 0.. Q) Q.V I/) a. f'..f'..v",-v ::J ... OO-'-f'..f'..(,) ~ c: . . . . . 0 Q)moomlOV ã:: ....mvmvN :; <r-~N('f') Ü '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. c:o <0 <0 <0 c:o " " " " " "t:' mOOlOom Q) ~~I"-:~~ I/) vf'.....-CO<O ~ I~ CONf'..COf'.. Q) "'-"-'-N ~ e .... 0.. Q) Q.(') I/) a. COf'..-'-Ov ::J - mv<om-.- ~ c: còcòoi-i" 0 ~ ä: f'..-.-IOf'..1O .... '-T"""T"""N ::J Ü '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. <0 c:o <0 c:o <0 " " " " " "t:' f'..CO(,)COCO Q) ~~~~~ I/) vO...-(')v ~ g <omNIOO Q) -'--.-N Q) e ~ 0.. êi> o.N I/) a. (')OvNv ::J ... f'..mmCOm ~ c: a>r?NNa> 0 Q) ä: t: 10 CO.-v 00 ::J ...- .- .- ü '#. ~ <f.. #. #. <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 " ,...: " " " "t:' (,)1Of'..N<O Q) ~~~~~ I/) ° <0<0 CO <0 ~ & v 1Of'.. CO-.- Q) .- Q) 0 ~ .... êi> 0.. 0..- I/) a. OlO<O<Ov ::J - NIO"'-NO ~ c: "N-'-:NCÒ .2 Q) 0.. .... (,)1Of'..COO .... .- ::J Ü (1) a a a ~íp N >- >- >- >-1>- ëñ N (') v <01 co '#. '#. '#. '#. '#. <0 <0 <0 c:o <0 " " " " " "t:' c:o.-(')mv Q) ~~I"-:~~ I/) OC:O...-N(') ~ ~ "'-...-N(') v <II (1) e ~ .... «10.. Q) .... Q.x I/)UJ a. m<ommf'.. ::J - O"'-...-N(') ~ c: . . . . . 0 <11010000 ä: ......-..-N(') V ..... ::J Ü '#. '#. '#. '#. ~ 0 <0 ~ <0 <0 <0 " f'.. " " " "t:' (')...-c:oo(') m...-omco <II . . . . . I~ IONOmf'.. ~ IO(')"'-f'.."" Q) "-N(')(') v Q) e ~ .... 0.. <II o.c:o I/) a. ...-...-1010<0 ::J ... m,....-oo ~ c: -iLricòr?-i 0 ~ ã: V.-OOlOv ::J '-NN(')v () #. #. #. #. '$. <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 ,...: " ,...: " " "t:' COVNf'.....- Q) ~'"':~~~ VI "'-(')"-(,)10 ~ .~ (')mc:o(')o Q) "'-...-N(')v <II e ~ ... 0.. Q) 0.10 I/) a. ,...m(')olO ::J ... (')V...-OOO ~ c: Na>r?OcD ,2 <II 0.. ... N,...v-.-"" .... "'-...-N(')(') ::J Ü Q) a a a a a N >- >- >- >- >- ëñ N (') v <0 00 ~ ~ .,¡ ø >- iij c: ~ C» 'ª tV a Exhibit D Residential Garbage Rate Survey (Rates do not include applicable sales tax) City Garbage Recycle Fee Fee Total Bedford $6.70 $1.59 $8.29 Haltom City 6.13 2.06 8.19 Keller 7.74 2.23 9.97 Richland Hills ** 8.59 N/A 8.59 Euless 6.00 1.70 7.70 Colleyville 7.13 1.61 8.74 Hurst 5.98 1.67 7.65 Grapevine 6.98 1.74 8.72 Watauga 6.29 1.80 8.07 NRH Current 6.10 1.69 7.79 NRH Proposed 6.56 1.69 8.25 ** Recycle fee included in garbage fee but not broken out. EXHIBIT E "Take-All Service is added to Residential Collection" "Take-All" simply means that we will collect all items placed on the curb as long as it is containerized in a bag, in a box, or if tied and bundled, and is fifty (50) Ibs. or less in weight. Note: Brush & Tree limbs must be tied in bundles not to exceed four feet (4') in length and fifty (50) Ibs. in weight. This service includes construction and fencing materials generated by the homeowner resulting from repair and remodeling projects. Bulky items, including stoves, furniture, hot water heaters, dishwashers, etc.., when placed on the curb will be picked up as a part of the normal collection. Important Note: Federal Laws prohibit the collection of refrigerator or freezer units unless certification is provided that CFC's have been removed by a Certified Technician. Other hazardous waste items that are not acceptable for landfill disposal include tires, batteries, petroleum products, paints and other chemicals and solvents identified as hazardous by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Due to this increased level of service there should be limited need for citizens to use the Fort Worth Landfill. Should you have the need to dispose of loose brush or uncontainerized construction materials, you should call the Fort Worth Landfill @ 838-2338 or surrounding landfills for current rates of disposal. To better serve you, the Customer, please have all items at the curb for collection by 7:00 a.m. If you have any questions regarding your service please call our fully staffed Customer Service Department at 332-7301. Thank you. LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. 95-142 ~ Date December 11, 1995 ~ SUb):C!: Professional Services for Girls Fast Pitch Softball Complex The 1995/96 Parks and Recreation Facilities Development Capital Improvement Program included funding for design of new facilities for Girls Fast Pitch Softball. The Parks and Recreation Board and City Council reviewed the preliminary concept plan for the Girls Fast Pitch Softball Complex at work sessions on November 2 and November 11, 1995. The plan includes four lighted softball fields, two practice fields with backstops, restroom and concession building, multi-use trail, playground, pavilion, picnic facilities, a trail connection to the North Electric Trail, and associated parking, landscape and irrigation. Staff considered the following five firms for the design services to include master planning, preparation of a TPWD grant application for the January 31, 1996 deadline, and preparation of plans and specifications for the construction of the park: Newman, Jackson, Beiberstein, Inc J. T. Dunkin and Associates Mesa Design Group Schrickel, Rollins, and Associates Brinkley/Sargent Architects It is our opinion that Mesa Design Group is the best and most qualified firm to provide the requested professional services. This recommendation is based on their previous experience, experience of their subconsultants, reputation of the firm, and similar project experience applicable to this project. Additionally, Mesa Design Group has considerable experience and an outstanding history of TPWD grant awards. It is requested that City Council authorize staff to negotiate a contract with Mesa Design Group for the necessary design services. Since it requires six to eight weeks to properly prepare a TPWD grant application, staff would like to proceed immediately to work with Mesa to complete the grant application prior to the deadline of January 31, 1996 deadline. The design service agreement will be submitted for Council consideration at the January 8,1996 meeting. Respectfully submitted, ~~ -r- Jim Browne JB/sm ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - NOVEMBER 13, 1995 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order November 13, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown JoAnn Johnson Lyle E. Welch Mack Garvin Mark Wood Ray Oujesky Byron Sibbet Linda Spurlock Sansoucie Staff: C.A. Sanford Randy Shiflet Larry Cunningham Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Greg Dickens Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer 2. INVOCATION Councilman Sibbet gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 23, 1995 APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the minutes of the October 23, 1995 meeting. Motion carried 7-0. November 13, 1995 Page 2 5. PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION MINUTES B. PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MINUTES No action necessary. 6. PRESENTATION ON UNITED WAY BY STEVE PAPAGNO Mr. Steve Papagno gave a report on the United Way campaign. Mayor Brown presented Debra Kimbrough, Mrs. North Richland Hills, with a proclamation. Councilman Sibbet thanked the Fire Department for their response to the fire on Mid- Cities Boulevard. 7. REMOVAL OF ITEM{S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Sibbet removed Items No. 26, 27 and 28 from the Consent Agenda. 8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM{S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (11, 16, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,&29) APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. November 13, 1995 Page 3 9. PZ 95-21 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A CELLULAR TELEPHONE TOWER ON LOT 2, BLOCK 10, RICHLAND HEIGHTS ADDITION - ORDINANCE NO. 2088 (LOCATED AT 4413 EAST LOOP 820 NORTH) APPROVED Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor to come forward. Mr. Peter Kavanagh, representing Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, appeared before the Council in favor of the zoning request. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Pro,Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve Ordinance No. 2088. Motion carried 7-0. 10. PZ 95-22 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF STEVE AND VICKI WEINBERG TO REZONE TRACTS 2A, 2A1, 2A1A AND 2A2, MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1055, FROM AG AGRICULTURE TO R-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ORDINANCE NO. 2089 (LOCATED IN THE 8800 BLOCK OF AMUNDSON DRIVE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS) APPROVED COUNCILMAN WOOD ABSTAINED FROM DISCUSSION AND VOTING. Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor to please come forward. November 13, 1995 Page 4 Mr. Jackey Fluitt, representing the owners, appeared before the Council in favor of the request. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. Mrs. Myrtis Byrd, 7311 Hialeah Circle, appeared before the Council and expressed concerns about drainage, egress and ingress. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Johnson, to approve Ordinance No. 2089. Motion carried 6-0; Councilman Wood abstaining. *11. PS 95-36 REQUEST OF RANDALL'S PROPERTIES FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A, RUFE SNOW VILLAGE ADDITION (LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE AND HIGHTOWER DRIVE) APPROVED 12. GN 95-135 APPOINTMENT TO LIBRARY BOARD APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to appoint Ms. Carol Benoit to Place 4 on the Library Board. Motion carried 7-0. 13. GN 95-136 ELECTION OF TARRANT APPRAISAL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS - RESOLUTION NO. 95-56 APPROVED Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve Resolution No. 95-56. Motion carried 7-0. November 13, 1995 Page 5 14. GN 95-137 APPOINTMENT TO TOWN HALL COMMITTEE APPROVED Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to appoint Mr. Greg Werking to Place 6 on the Town Hall Committee. Motion carried 7-0. 15. GN 95-138 CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING THE MASONRY REQUIREMENT POSTPONED Councilwoman Sansoucie moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to postpone GN 95-138 and refer it to a committee of builders for recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission to send their recommendations to the City Manager. Motion carried 7-0. *16. GN 95-139 TEMPORARY RELOCATION OF CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS- ORDINANCE NO. 2085 APPROVED 17. GN 95-140 APPROVE "NO PARKING" ZONE ON NORTHRIDGE BOULEVARD FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH HARWOOD ROAD NORTH TO 5335 NORTHRIDGE BOULEVARD - ORDINANCE NO. 2086 APPROVED Ms Susan Peters, 5301 Northridge, appeared urging the Council to approve Ordinance No. 2086. November 13, 1995 Page 6 Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No. 2086. Motion carried 7-0. 18. GN 95-141 REQUEST OF MIKE STEVENS TO VARY FROM THE MASONRY REQUIREMENT APPROVED Councilwoman Sansoucie moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to grant the variance from the masonry requirement with the stipulation that it be constructed to the manufacturer's specifications and place a moratorium on the granting of variances from the masonry requirement until a recommendation is received from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried 7-0. *19. GN 95-142 RATIFICATION OF LOPEZ V. CITY SETTLEMENT- RESOLUTION NO. 95-57 APPROVED *20. PU 95-72 AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF INTOXIL YZER THROUGH STATE OF TEXAS CONTRACT APPROVED *21. PU 95-73 EXTEND CONTRACT FOR THE PRINTING OF THE LEISURE RESOURCE GUIDE *22. PU 95-74 AWARD BID FOR ANNUAL OFFICE SUPPLY CONTRACT APPROVED *23. PU 95-75 REQUEST TO APPROVE BID FOR 1995-96 PROPERTY INSURANCE APPROVED November 13, 1995 Page 7 *24. PW 95-69 APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO.1 FOR RODGER LINE DRIVE, PHASE B (ADDITION OF AMUNDSON ROAD) APPROVED *25. PW 95-70 AWARD OF BID ON HIGHTOWER DRIVE, SECTION A1, PAVING, DRAINAGE AND SIGNALIZATION IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED 26. PW 95-71 APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE RUFE SNOW DRIVE/IH 820 BRIDGE _ RESOLUTION NO. 95-43 POSTPONED 27. PW 95-72 APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE RUFE SNOW DRIVE/KAREN DRIVE INTERSECTION _ RESOLUTION NO. 95-42 POSTPONED 28. PW 95-73 APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE RUFE SNOW DRIVE/GLENVIEW DRIVE INTERSECTION _ RESOLUTION NO. 95-41 POSTPONED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Sansoucie, to postpone PW 95-71, PW 95-72, and PW 95-73. Motion carried 7-0. _._-,-- '-'~~-~---~ November 13,1995 Page 8 *29. PAY 95-21 APPROVE REIMBURSEMENT TO THE CITY OF HURST FOR REtOCA TION OF TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY'S 24-INCH WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN AT PRECINCT LINE ROAD APPROVED 30. CITIZENS PRESENTATION None. 31. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting. Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - NOVEMBER 20, 1995 - 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order November 20, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Lyle E. Welch Mack Garvin Mark Wood Ray Oujesky Byron Sibbet Linda Spurlock Sansoucie Mayor Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Staff: C.A. Sanford Randy Shiflet Larry Cunningham Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Jerry McGlasson City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Secretary Attorney Police Chief Absent: JoAnn Johnson Mayor Pro Tem 1. GN 95-143 ACCEPTANCE OF POLICE CONSULTANT'S REPORT ON THE FEASIBILITY OF CREATING A CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT APPROVED Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to accept the Police Consultant report. Motion carried 6-0. City Council Minutes November 20, 1995 Page 2 2. GN 95-144 RESOLUTION PROPOSING CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT AND APPOINTING SEVEN TEMPORARY DlRECTORS- RESOLUTION NO. 95-59 APPROVED Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Resolution No. 95-59 and appoint Mayor Brown, Mayor Pro Tem Johnson, Councilmen Welch, Garvin, Wood and Sibbet and Councilwoman Sansoucie as the temporary directors. Motion carried 6-0. 3. GN 95-145 CHANGING VOTING LOCATION FROM 8300 STARNES ROAD TO 7301 BURSEY ROAD _ RESOLUTION NO. 95-60 APPROVED Councilman Welch moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve Resolution No. 95-60. Motion carried 6-0. 4. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting. Tommy Brown - Mayor . ATTEST: Patricia Hutson - Assistant City Secretary Department: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Inspections 12/11/95 Council Meeting Date: Subject: Public Hearing to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 1874 regarding Concrete or Asphalt Paved Parking Areas. Agenda Number: PZ 95-18 Ordinance No. 2069 Attached is an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding parking, driving and maneuvering areas. City staff receives many inquiries about whether a parking area can be constructed of gravel or other loose material. Since the current ordinance does not specify a surface material for the these areas, it is unclear whether a facility could use gravel, rock or compacted soil. The proposed amendment will require that all parking, driving and maneuvering areas be constructed of either concrete or asphalt. The proposed ordinance includes a section on the applicability of the requirement. If a business or parking lot does not have either concrete or asphalt parking, driving and maneuvering areas, the business or property owner would have to comply when any of the following occurs: · Upon all new construction; or · When an existing building is proposed for remodeling, alteration, addition, or expansion, in which the value of the proposed construction exceeds seventy-five percent of the current appraised value of the existing structures, excluding the value of the land; or · When an existing building is proposed for an addition that will increase the square footage of the existing building by thirty-percent or greater; or · As a requirement of the approval of a Special Use Permit or Planned Unit Development. '-- These applicability requirements are identical to those found in the landscaping section. There are several benefits to using a hard paved all-weather surface rather than a loose material. An all- weather surface provides emergency vehicles safe and stable access during periods of inclement weather. A paved surface also prevents rocks and dirt from being tracked into public streets where the material will wash into the storm sewer or be kicked up into the windshields of vehicles. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this amendment at its October 26, 1995 meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: 30nds (GO/Rev.) '- Operating Budget Ot Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ f!4kt ,º' Ci1y Mana~er I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Ftn.nce o".ceot ORDINANCE NO. 2069 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, AS AMENDED, TO REQUIRE CONCRETE OR ASPHALT HARD PAVED SURFACES FOR PARKING, DRIVING AND MANEUVERING AREAS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that dirt, gravel, rock and other loose road materials tends to deter the delivery of public safety services by prohibiting adequate access onto properties by emergency vehicles during periods of inclement weather, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that dirt, gravel, rock and other loose road materials track onto public streets causing windshield damage to vehicles, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined the need to establish regulations to require concrete or asphalt hard paved surfaces for parking, driving and maneuvering areas, and WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Rich/and Hills, Texas, has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 by changing the said Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: 1. THAT, Section 700 F, Ordinance 1874, as amended, is hereby amended to insert the following 9. Concrete and Asphalt Standards for Parking, Driving and Maneuvering Areas All required and non-required parking, driving and maneuvering areas shall be hard paved surfaces constructed of concrete or asphalt material equivalent to the minimum construction standards contained in the North Richland Hills Building Code. Rock, gravel and dirt parking, driving and maneuvering areas shall not be permitted. Exception: Paving stone parking, driving and maneuvering areas constructed with adequate base material shall be acceptable. The provisions of this subsection shall apply in the following situations: a. Upon all new construction; or, b. When an existing building is proposed for remodeling, alteration, addition, or expansion, in which the value of the proposed construction exceeds seventy-five percent of the current appraised value of the existing structures, excluding the value of the land; or, c. When an existing building is proposed for an addition that will increase the square footage of the existing building by thirty percent or greater; or, d. As a requirement of the approval of a Special Use Permit or Planned Unit Development. 2. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 3. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 26th DAY OF OCTOBER 1995. ~~~/ Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER 1995 Mayor City of North Richland Hills, Texas ATTEST: City Secretary City of North Richland Hills, Texas APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Ordinance No. 2069 Page 2 MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS OCTOBER 26, 1995 - 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER The meeti was called to order by Chairman David Barfield at 7:30 p.m. Richard Davis es Brock Vic Baxter Paul r Barry LeB Gregory Arrin David Barfield Don Bowen Ron Lueck Jill Spicer ROLL CALL PRESENT Chairman Members Planning Director Plans Examiner ABSENT CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1995 Mr. Baxter made the motion to approve the minutes as pres ted. The motion was seconded g. ZONING CASES 1. PZ 95-18 Continuation of a Public Hearing to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 1874 regarding Automobile Storage and Display. TABLED 9/28/95 Chairman Davis reopened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to come forward at this time. He stated that this item was tabled at the previous meeting for staff to make modifications as directed by the Commission. Mr. LeBaron stated this amendment will clarify questions regarding surface material for parking and driving areas. There being no one wishing to speak, Chairman Davis closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Brock made the motion to approve PZ 95-18. The motion was seconded by Mr. Miller. The motion carried 4-0. 2. PZ 95-21 se Pe "t for a Cellular Telephone Tower on Lot 2, Block 10, Richland Heights Addition. (Located at 4413 t Loop 820 North) Chairman is opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to come forward at this e. 05 W Greenbriar, Dallas, came forward to speak. He stated he would Commission might have. Mr. Peter Kavanaug answer any questions peak, Chairman Davis closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Miller made the motion to ap motion carried 4-0. e PZ 95-21. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brock. The MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS September 28, 1995 - 7:30 p.m. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1995 Mr. Davis made the motion to appr Planner Building Officia Plans Examiner Asst. City Manager ABSENT David Barfield Richard Davis Victor Baxter Paul Miller Clayton Husband Steve Pence Gregory Arrington Randy Shiflet ames Brock n Bowen Lueck CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman David Barfield at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL the minutes as presented. The motion was seconded ZONING CASES 1. PZ 95-18 Continuation of a Public Hearing to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 1874 regarding Automobile Storage and Display. TABLED 9/14/95 Chairman Barfield reopened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to come forward at this time. Mr. Husband stated staff will take the comments offered by the Commission at the work session and prepare another draft of the ordinance. He stated the comments included modifications regarding applicability for existing uses and new structures, exemptions for fully screened area, and different criteria for different types of uses. Mr. Davis stated any design criteria will be in the building code, not the zoning ordinance. Mr. Davis made the motion to table PZ 95-18 so city staff could make changes to the ordinance as directed by the Commission. The motion was seconded by Mr. Miller. The motion carried 4-0. Request of Amundson/Crane Limited Partnership for Revised Preliminary Plat of Blocks 5-8, Woodland Oaks Addition. (located at the southeast corner of Crane Road and Amundson Road) 's made the motion to approve PS 94-56, subject to engineering comments, and subject to the entlr [ty being final platted. The motion was seconded by Mr. Baxter. The motion carried 4-0. 3. PS 95-30 Request of John Volkman I Plat of lots 1-18, Block 12, Stonybrooke Addition. (located at the west end of Stephanie Drive MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS September 14, 1995 - 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER 'ng was called to order by Chairman David Barfield at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT Chairman Members Planning Director Planner Asst. City Manager ABSENT David Barfield Jill Spicer ichard Davis Lueck iller Baron Clayto usband Randy Sh James BrocK Don Bowen Victor Baxter ~ presented. The motion was seconded CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 24, 1995 Mr. Davis made the motion to approve the minu ZONING CASES 1. PZ 95-18 Public Hearing to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No.1 874 regarding Automobile Storage and Display. Mr. LeBaron stated the city gets requests for gravel parking lots and driveways. He stated the language in the ordinance is not very specific and probably should be regarding whether the surface should be concrete or asphalt. He stated the original intent was to require this only for auto repair uses, but the requirement could be expanded to all uses. Chairman Barfield stated that some type of design criteria should be considered and that the requirement should apply to all uses in the city. Chairman Barfield opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to come forward at this time. There being no one wishing to speak, Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Davis made the motion to table PZ 95-18 so city staff could make changes to the ordinance as directed by the Commissioners. The motion was seconded by Ms. Spicer. The motion carried 4-0. Chairman Barfield stated that Mr. Lueck is now present at the meeting and will be voting on the rest of the cases. 2. PZ 95-19 e at 5721 Carolyn Drive) Chairman Barfield opened the forward at this time. earing and called for those wishing to speak to come CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 12111/95 Subject: Authorized Signatures for Pledgee Signature Authorization Form, Resolution No. 95-61 Agenda Number: GN 95-145 As a result of City staff changes, a resolution is required authorizing signatures for the release of pledged securities with Nationsbank and the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. The following positions are suggested to be included on the list of authorized individuals: Director of Finance Accounting Manager Accountant Utility Services Manager Charles Harris Jackie Theriot Bret Starr Victor Jones The proposed resolution authorizes the Mayor to execute the signature form which designates these individuals. Recommendation: It is recommended that Resolution No. 95-61 be approved. Finance Review FI.....ce Director Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other ~ epartment Head Signature~ CnYCOUNC~ACTION"EM Page 1 of Resolution No. 95-61 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: 1. The following officers of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas are hereby authorized to execute the Pledgee Signature Authorization Form on behalf of the governing body of the City: Name Title Jeannette Rewis City Secretary Charles Harris Finance Director Jackie Theriot Accounting Manager Bret Starr Accountant Victor Jones Utility Svcs. Mgr. 2. Signature The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the signature form, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof and marked Exhibit "A", as the act and deed of this City. PASSED AND APPROVED this 11th day of December, 1995 APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY: Attorney for the City PLEDGEE SIGNATURE AUTHORIZATION FORM TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS: RESOLVED, that the signatures written below are those persons who are hereby authorized and empowered to sign in transactions with the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas until said Federal Reserve Bank has received notice in writing that this authorily as to any or all of the persons whose names appear on this form have been revoked. Signature Name Tommy Brown Title Mayor Date December 11. 1995 Name/Address of Pledgee: Name City of North Richland Hills Address P. O. Box 820609 City/State/Zip Code N. Richland Hills. TX 76182-0009 Phone Number (817) 581-5500 CBI Number 311812521 AUTHORIZED PERSONS: Name Title Signature Jeannette Rewis City Secretary Bret Starr Accountant Charles Harris Finance Director Jackie Theriot Accounting Manager Victor Jones Utility SVC5. Mgr. (SEAL) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 Subject: Authorized Investment Officers Hesolutlon NO. 9b-62 Agenda Number: GN 95-146 As a result of City staff changes, a resolution is required amending the list of authorized personnel for conducting investment transactions with authorized securities dealers and banking institutions. The following positions are suggested to be included on the list of authorized individuals: Director of Finance Accounting Manager Accountant Utility Services Manager Charles Harris Jackie Theriot Bret Starr Victor Jones The proposed resolution authorizes the Mayor to execute the fonn which designates these individuals. Recommendation: It is recommended that Resolution No. 95-62 be approved. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget _ ~ Other ~ Department Head Signatu~ CITYCOUNC~ACnON"EM Finance Director Page 1 of Resolution No. 95-62 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: 1. The following officers of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas are hereby authorized to execute all investment transactions of the City with all securities dealers and banking institutions approved by the City's Investment Committee in accordance with the City's Investment Policy. 1. Charles Harr~ Signature ~ Director of Finance 2. Jackie Theriot Signature C)/J.D j:} d ð ) tJ¡¿ 0 A L (jf--.) Accounting Manager 3. Bret Starr Accountant Signature {!J-~ 4. Victor Jones~ Signature / /- Utility Services Manager PASSED AND APPROVED this 11th day of December, 1995 APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY: Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1 Subject: Amending Authorized Investment Officers List for Texpool, Resolution No. 95-63 Agenda Number: 12/11/95 GN 95-147 Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: As a result of City staff changes, a resolution is required amending the authorized representatives list for Texpool. The following are suggested to be included on the list of authorized individuals: Director of Finance Accounting Manager Accountant Utility Services Manager Charles Harris Jackie Theriot Bret Starr Victor Jones The proposed resolution authorizes the Mayor to execute the form which designates these individuals. Recommendation: It is recommended that Resolution No. 95-63 be approved. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other . ~gnatur.~ CnYCOUNC~ACTION"EM Fln..ce DIreClOf Page 1 of Resolution No. 95-63 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: 1. The following officers of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas are hereby authorized to execute the Texpool Resolution Form Amending Authorized Representatives on behalf of the governing body of the City: 1. Charles Harris Signature cØ~&¢ Jackie Theriot Director of Finance 2. Accounting Manager SignatureC)/JO /.)¡~) 0J¿o~, W 3. Bret Starr Accountant Signature !3J-~ 4. Victor Jones, Jr. Signature tLf)9 Utility Services Manager 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the amendment form, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof and marked Exhibit "A", as the act and deed of this City. PASSED AND APPROVED this 11th day of December, 1995 APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY: Attorney for the City An lnyeslmenl Service for f'ublic Funds RESOLUTION AMENDING AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES WHEREAS, City of North Richland Hills (the "Participant") is a political subdivision of the State of Texas and is empowered to delegate to a public funds investment pool the authority to invest funds, to act as a custodian of investments purchased with local investment funds; and WHEREAS, the Treasurer of the State of Texas, acting by and through the Texas Treasury Safekeeping Trust Company (the "Trust Company"), has created "TexPool", a public funds investment pool, to effectuate the goals of providing investments at the highest possible yield and maintaining complete safety of the funds of the Participant; WHEREAS, the Participant hereby requests the following changes regarding the individuals authorized to act on behalf of the Participant; NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved as follows: A. That City of North Richland Hills has entered into a Participation Agreement and has established an account in its name with the Trust Company's Local Government Investment Pool, "TexPool", for the purpose of transmitting local funds for investment by the Trust Company in TexPooI; B. That the following individuals, whose signatures appear on page 2 of this Resolution, are officers, employees, or authorized representatives of the Participant and are each hereby authorized to transmit funds to the Trust Company for investment in TexPool and are each further authorized to withdraw funds from time to time, to issue letters of instruction, and to take all other actions deemed necessary or appropriate for the investment of local funds: (over) 23007 7/27192 Page 2 1. Name Jackie Theriot Title Accounting Manager Signature ~ ð) 0¡wJ. j ÌJJ: ) 2. Name Bret Starr Signature ßJ- ~ 3. Name Victor Jones Title Accountant Title Utility Services Manager Signature 4. Name: Charles Title Director of Finance Signature C. That this resolution ana its authorization shall continue in full force and effect until aJIlended or revoked by the Participant, and until the Trust Company receives a copy of any such aJIlendInent or revocation. TIDs resolution is hereby introduced and adopted by the Participant at its regular/special meeting held on the 11 th day December ,19 95 NAME OF PARTICIPANT City of North. Richland Hills By: Signature Tommy Brown Printed Name Mayor Title ATTEST. Signature Jeanette Rewis Printed Name City Secretary Title OFFICIAL SEAL , ' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ; l Department: Finance Subject: Intent to Reimburse Expenditures With Proceeds ot t-uture Uebt. Resolution No. ~t>-ö4 Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 Agenda Number: GN 95-148 At the August 14,1995 City Council Meeting, Council approved new street and drainage Capital Improvements for 1995/96 in the amount of $6,055,000. In order to finance these new projects, a bond sale will be required in the Spring of 1996. Many of these projects are currently underway, and in order for the City to be able to reimburse any expenses prior to the time we actually receive the bond proceeds, it is necessary to pass a resolution declaring the City's intent to reimburse expenditures with proceeds of the future bond sale. The following projects are tentatively scheduled to be funded from the 1 ~96 bond sale: Amundson Rd. Hightower Dr. - Phase A 1 Hightower Dr. - Phase A2. Hightower Dr. - Phase B Hightower Dr. - Phase C Rufe Snow Dr. - Bridge at IH 820 Rufe Snow Dr. - IH 820 to Mid Cities Blvd Maplewood Rd. Crane Rd. Holiday Lane - Phase A2. (Lewis to Bogart) Holiday Lane - Phase B (Bogart to Watauga) 1995 Signalization (Industrial Dr. @ Browning Blvd.) 1996 Signalization (Mid Cities Blvd @ Holiday Ln.) Calloway Branch Channel - Phase A Calloway Branch Channel - Phase B Total Projects: $258,000 555,000 419,000 298,000 159,000 844,000 300,000 151,000 955,000 215,000 140,000 156,000 100,000 865,000 640.000 $6,055,000 The project list may be subject to change due to the timing of the TOOT construction of Rufe Snow Drive. If construction is delayed, other projects may be included in the current bond sale, while Rufe Snow would be funded at a later date. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 95-64 declaring its expectation to reimburse capital expenditures with proceeds from the 1996 General Obligation Bond Sale. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ r·· Other ~ é~r :S· ~ epa men Head Ignature CnYCOUNC~ACTION"EM FIMllce Director Resolution No. 95-64 A RESOLUTION declaring expectation to reimburse expenditures with the proceeds of future debt. WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas (the "Issuer") intends to issue debt for street and drainage improvements (the "Projects") and further intends to make certain capital expenditures with the proceeds of such debt; WHEREAS, under Treas. Reg. § 1.150-2 (the "Regulation"), to fund such reimbursements with the proceeds of tax-exempt obligations the Issuer must declare its expectation to make such reimbursement; and WHEREAS, the Issuer desires to preserve its ability to reimburse the capital expenditures with the proceeds of tax-exempt obligations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT the Issuer réasonably expects to reimburse capital expenditures with respect to the Projects with proceeds of debt hereafter to be issued by the Issuer, and that this resolution shall constitute a declaration of official intent under the Regulation. The maximum principal amount of obligations expected to be issued for the Projects is $6,500,000. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of December, 1995 APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY: Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS '- Department: Finance / City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 Subject: Designation of the Fort Worth St~r TAh::gr~m ~~ thA "Official City Newspaper" - Resolution 95-60 Agenda Number: GN 95-149 Request for Proposals were solicited for a news publication to act as the "Official City Newspaper". The results are outlined below. Fort Worth Star Telegram .ªº:::p§r:::J.iñi: Dallas/Fort Worth Suburban .40 per line The Fort Worth Star Telegram also proposed a special rate for legal ads not published in classified section and all employment advertisements. They met all the specifications and general requirements of the bid. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council approve Resolution 95-60 designating the Fort Worth Star Tele9ram as the "Official City Newspaper". Finance Review . ...uU ...¿..ø Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM 01-13-01-4010 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget ..x..- Other FI.....ce Dlrectot Page 1 of RESOLUTION 95-60 RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, DESIGNATING AN OFFICIAL CITY NEWSPAPER WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Texas provide a City shall designate a City newspaper each year, and; WHEREAS, the City Council has not designated an official newspaper this year, and; WHEREAS, the City Council feels that the City needs an official newspaper. BE IT, THEREFORE, RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: The Fort Worth Star Teleç¡ram is hereby designated as the official City newspaper for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas being a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said newspaper to be used for all official notices and publications of said City. PASSED AND APPROVED this 11th day of DECEMBER, 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City Department: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Inspections .'--.- Subject: Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 Consideration of a request to change the name of Parkman Agenda Number: GN 95-150 Drive to Rogers Drive. Ordinance No. 2090 Attached is a request from Dr. Charles and Mrs. Fay Rogers that the street name Parkman Drive be changed to Rogers Drive. Parkman Drive is a dead end street located on the south side of Martin 'Drive, between Crane Road and Precinct Line Road. The Rogers live at 6416 Parkman Drive; their house is the only residence on the street. Six property owners adjacent to Parkman Drive have been notified of the request. The proposed street name change does not conflict with any existing street names in the city. A public hearing is not required to consider this request. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider Ordinance No. 2090. '-...-- Source of Funds: 30nds (GO/Rev.) v Operating Budget Oth13 Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available rtment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . F,n.ance O.,eCfor Ordinance No. 2090 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, CHANGING THE NAME OF PARKMAN DRIVE TO ROGERS DRIVE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the the City Council has received a request to change the name of Parkman Drive to Rogers Drive; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that such change shall be adopted; NOW, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, Parkman Drive, from its existing intersection at Martin Drive, south to its terminiation, is hereby renamed Rogers Drive. 2. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1995. ATTEST: Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City DR CHARLES RAND MRS FAY H ROGERS 6416 PARKMAN DRIVE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180-4807 TEL Œ17Þ281-7177 FAX Œ17Þ281-0207 November 10, 1995 C. A. Sanford, City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: REQUEST TO CHANGE NAME OF PARKMAN DRIVE TO ROGERS DRIVE Dear C.A. We reside at 6416 Parkman Drive in North Richland Hills. We have lived here for almost 20 years and do not plan on moving. We love this place. Two of our children and a grand daughter have attended Richland High. Our grand daughter, who graduated last year and has gone on to Mary Hardin Baylor University on a Cross Country Scholarship, worked as a life guard last summer at NRH20. She loved it and we did, too. We are the only house on Parkman Drive which is only one block long and has no outlets. We would like to formally request that Parkman Drive be changed to Rogers Drive. Weare thankful for the improvements that have been made to our city and our street since you have been City manager. ~Q' ~/)~¿¿¿¡)Pß£-J Dr. and Mrs. Chi RRogers ~~ f'Pfi j0 V[ .., .1 IS.t z..., '" :; '" , t, 9 I I I M ^ R ilN DR1"-lE TR 1202 1.54 ...e. I ::;u N~ -1l1. 2 ;E c; 1 . 1 I TR I "12f" 5 1 .... \ SON :5' rHOMPsí A íS Rt<~ pA ~ l' "'. , TR ....2... !I 2'· ,,",' .. ~ 3 p~í5Ý ~ 4 TR 12H TR 12K 2~66S 2.18 Ae 2.5 ...e TR 12 5.2 ...e '_.1 -,. a: a 3 J " 1ð S"J1 u. T~ 'ilf.z. /S.SJ./.~@ T!. I:' G l.4j1/.@, . "^ \ D - c rT\ E.S 6QOl-E. "þ\;ï:. Þ Q J Tl( I/A J. C. .¡, J fil@. 1"# :1 ...., ~ Ttf. /;.1;,1 r~ '¡ÄJð f :1 r / S'. I ~ @. ... .. .., /I. 1.J.7 e. -. I~'.I _,I I J c..J TR 31. 9.962 · ...e ¡ j ~ . !Î ,.... .. TR .. ~ ... 'If.I't~ ,I ... I ., TR 3£ " 9.9 ...e · ¡. j r I I ....".1 , . y : TR 38 9.9 Ae · 3 pARt< .... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Parks and Recreation Department ~ Subject: Little Bear Creek Flood Plain Management _ Ordinance No. 2091 Council Meeting Date: 12-11-95 Agenda Number: GN 95-151 The Little Bear Creek Council Committee has worked with staff from the Parks and Recreation Department, Planning and Inspections Department, and Public Works to develop a flood plain management ordinance. The ordinance will guide developers and the City concerning development of the Little Bear Creek watershed within North Richland Hills. The ordinance is designed to preserve the fully developed 100-year flood plain in its existing natural state in lieu of channelization. The adopted Little Bear Creek Corridor Study, prepared by Newman, Jackson, Beiberstein, Inc., established the preservation of the environmental significance of this creek corridor and recommended the adoption of the proposed ordinance. The flood plain based on a fully developed watershed is the corridor boundary and is delineated on the Little Bear Creek Corridor Boundary Map, which is a part of the ordinance. The Boundary Map also identifies the environmentally significant areas within the flood plain corridor. .,- The key elements of the ordinance are as listed below: · Establishes a Development Review Committee for enforcement of the ordinance requirements. · Reclamation of floodplain area which is part of the Corridor is discouraged. · All the Corridor area will be designated as "drainage and public access easement" when platted or dedicated as fee simple title property to the City. · Developers adjacent to the Corridor must maximize public access by paralleling streets to the Corridor. · Lots shall front or side the Corridor but not back the Corridor. . Flnlll'lce Director Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other ',~ -<t,~.rt~.~dsi;.ture fiv C"Y COUNCIL ACTION "EM Page 1 of ~ - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . Visibility and access easements will be dedicated on street corners adjacent to the Corridor. '-- . A 10-foot wide concrete sidewalk will be required adjacent to the Corridor along the parallel streets. RECOMMENDATION: The Little Bear Creek Council Committee and Staff recommend Council approve Ordinance No. 2091. '- ',-- CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page ;;¿ of ~ ORDINANCE NO. 2091 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ESTABLISHING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF FUTURE PLATS WITHIN THE LITTLE BEAR CREEK DRAINAGE BASIN; DEFINING THE LANDS TO WHICH THIS ORDINANCE APPLIES; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted the Little Bear Creek Corridor Study, attached as Exhibit A, which establishes the preservation of the environmental significance of this creek corridor, and recommends establishing a flood plain management ordinance to prevent the channelization of this corridor and to preserve its flood plain as a natural drainage way; and WHEREAS, the Little Bear Creek watershed is rapidly developing, which will increase the storm water discharge and correspondingly increase the water surface elevation; and WHEREAS, the City Council has recognized the Little Bear Creek Corridor as an open space connector as a part of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as well as part of the City- wide Trail System Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills has identified a need to maximize adjacency of public thoroughfares to the creek corridor and its tributaries; and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills recognizes the inherent beauty and value of the creek and development strategies which preserve it as a natural resource; and WHEREAS, the Little Bear Creek Corridor Boundary Map, attached as Exhibit B, presents a flood plain delineation for Little Bear Creek based on a fully developed watershed, and presents delineation of environmentally significant areas consistent with the development guidelines presented in the Little Bear Creek Corridor Study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, THAT: This ordinance shall be considered as guidelines for the Planning and Zoning Commission in approving or disapproving plats in that portion of the Little Bear Creek drainage area which is defined below, in the body of the ordinance and any exhibits thereto. The controls in the platting considerations, which are set out in this ordinance, are adopted as legislative and discretionary acts of the Council in prescribing regulations within a specified portion of the City which shall only apply to sub-divisions which are platted in the future under the platting function imposed by statute. These regulations so prescribed and enacted are: 1 Article 1 Purpose and Intent Section 100. Goals and Objectives The City of North Richland Hills recognizes the natural landscape along Little Bear Creek flood plain as a unique setting distinct to North Richland Hills. To ensure that this characteristic and quality are maintained and enhanced, these guidelines and this ordinance are established: A. To enhance drainage functions of the corridor while preserving the natural qualities of the creek. B. To create a linear greenbelt system that will complement and enhance adjacent development. C. To support the objective of maintaining a balanced and diverse landscape which promotes a rural character. D. To encourage parkways to run along the flood plain for public access and to maintain views. Section 110. Compliance with Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance No. 2061 Nothing contained herein shall exempt any development from the requirements contained in the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance, as adopted and amended by the City of North Richland Hills. The requirements contained herein shall be in addition to any requirements contained in the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. Section 120. Delineation of Area Where Regulations Apply These regulations shall be applicable to all new subdivisions and re-subdivisions within the corporate city limits which are located in and within one hundred fifty (150) feet of the Little Bear Creek fully developed 100 year flood plain limits, and it's major tributaries, as identified on the Little Bear Creek Boundary Map. Section 130. Establishment of a Development Review Committee The City Manager shall appoint a Development Review Committee comprised of representatives of the Public Works Department, Planning Department, Parks and Recreation Department, and other staff as deemed appropriate, to review proposed subdivisions as re-subdivisions for consistency with this ordinance and the Development Guidelines identified in the Little Bear Creek Corridor Study and the Little Bear Creek 2 Boundary Map, and make recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Article 2 Reclamation Options Within the Fully Developed Flood Plain Section 200. General Requirement The base flood elevation and flood plain used for design and planning shall be evaluated upon total storm water discharge quantities that will, through future urbanization, be generated from a fully developed watershed. Reclamation of land areas located within the fully developed flood plain of the Little Bear Creek Corridor and its tributaries are discouraged by these regulations. The drainage way of the creek and it's major tributaries shall be left in a natural state to control erosive velocities, prevent excessive downstream discharges and preserve the natural effect of the stream. When a development is proposed in the platting process, which intends to reclaim any portion of the fully developed 100 year flood plain, the requirements of this Article shall apply. Section 210. Reclamation of Flood Plain No portion of the fully developed 100 year flood plain shall be reclaimed unless all of the following criteria have been satisfied: A. It can be demonstrated that there will be no rise in the 1 DO-year frequency flood elevation for a fully developed upstream watershed. B. No environmentally significant area, as established In the Little Bear Creek Boundary Map, will be adversely impacted. C. Any flood plain remaining after final reclamation shall be designated in accordance with Section 220 of this ordinance. Section 220. Designation of Fully Developed 100 Year Flood Plain Where land is considered for development and reclamation or partial reclamation has been approved and accepted, or where no reclamation of the fully developed 100 year flood plain is proposed, the following alternatives shall apply: A. Any flood plain remaining after final reclamation shall be dedicated as a drainage and public access easement to the City to prevent further encroachment, allow public access, and assure proper drainage maintenance. 3 B. Any flood plain remaining after final reclamation, if so desired by the applicant, may be dedicated by plat or fee simple title to the City. C. When a portion of the fully developed 100 year flood plain is contained within the limits of a subdivision plat, it shall be designated on the plat as a "Drainage and Public Access Easement" or, if so desired by the applicant, may be designated on the plat as dedicated to the City. D. Flood plain designation, as described in this article, shall be concurrent with the approval of final plat or replat in the statutory platting process. Article 3 Development Standards Section 300. Maximizing Public Exposure and Providing Public Access to the Flood Plain To the maximum extent feasible, subdivisions shall be designed so as to maximize public exposure and provide access to the flood plain corridor. Every new subdivision or re- subdivision shall provide for public access to the flood plain and open space as follows: A. Public Access shall be provided by the alignment of continuous parallel streets along the frontage of the corridor, as demonstrated in Figure 1 and 2 on Exhibit C attached hereto. B. When it is not possible to align continuous streets, access points shall be provided through the use of cul-de-sac's opening onto the flood plain and loop streets paralleling the flood plain at minimum five hundred (500) foot intervals. C. Lots shall either front or side the flood plain. Cul-de-sac's shall open onto the flood plain, providing maximum public access. No lot shall back to the flood plain, unless when absolutely necessary due to engineering constraints or upon recommendation of the Development Review Committee. Section 310. Residential Street, Access, and Visibility Easements The development requirements of this section shall apply to every new subdivision or re- subdivision of property located within the Little Bear Creek Corridor. A. Lots located on Residential streets and Minor Collector streets shall provide a minimum thirty five (35) foot front building line to retain and enhance the natural qualities of the corridor, reinforce the development image, and create a continuous road edge. 4 B. Visibility Sight Triangles, as shown in Figure 3 on Exhibit C attached hereto, are required. No fence, screening wall, sign, structure, hedge, tree, or shrub shall be erected, planted or maintained in such a manner so as to obstruct or interfere with a clear line of sight of the drivers of approaching motor vehicles within a visibility sight triangle. Within this triangle, vision shall be clear at elevations between thirty inches and nine feet above the average curb grade. On corner lots where two C2U Minor Collector streets intersect, or where a C2U Minor Collector street intersects with a R2U Residential street or larger, the triangular area shall be formed by the greater of either (1) extending the two curb lines from an imaginary point of intersection a distance of thirty-five feet and connecting these points with an imaginary line, thereby making a triangle, or (2) extending the property lines, from their point of intersection, a distance of fifteen feet and connecting these points with an imaginary line, thereby making a triangle. In cases where streets do not intersect at approximately right angles, the Public Works Director shall have the authority to vary these requirements as deemed necessary to provide safety for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. However, sight distance shall not be required in excess of 275 feet. C. North Tarrant Parkway and Davis Boulevard shall have a minimum 60 foot visibility and access triangular easement, as shown in Figure 4 on Exhibit C attached hereto, adjacent to the right-of-way line within the limits of the corridor as described in Section 120 of this ordinance. Section 320. Sidewalk Requirements Sidewalks shall be required along all residential streets within the corridor, including the open space along the Little Bear Creek flood plain. Sidewalks along the open space frontage of the Little Bear Creek flood plain shall be constructed as a parallel-to-the-street meandering 10 foot concrete trail, as shown in Figure 5 on Exhibit C. Article 4 Severability Clause That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgement or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance or any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 5 Article 5 Effective Date That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from the date of passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED This the _ day of ,1995 APPROVED: Tommy Brown, mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City 6 "~ A Development Guide for the LITTLE BEAR CREEK CORRIDOR N®RTH RICH LAND HILLS Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc. Urban Planning and Landscape Architecture Dallas, Texas "EXHIBIT C" DIAGRAMS A~ rorNT Figure 1. ParalælSúeetAccess Figure 2. ~ ~, "- ....¡ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~: ~I'_I '_ filt"~;:" "\1 ' . .., . :':; - ,0 VIS/"fLrTr Tf(WIqLf!. ":'.1· , , ..·1 :' .~:;, Þmq' IWL. SIT-04,CJ(.~ . :1 ' .'. ~~ .' .::.,\ '~:-. :..~~ '~{:;'~~~~,.. - K' -ð- -. ~ 1"'/Ø~e'tn"T' ..lA/ii' : 0 Cl/fD ~ ~~NrV1L S(7'l!1:T:: .. ~ -' ~ Figure 3. Visibility Triangle s : INTEfl.SEa1oÑ '=>16N).,Ge: 8- PAVEMENt' MA.1~o)(·lNE6 . ., Parallel Street with Lots Siding . . . II .< OJ 3 .., - -0 -0 U1 C :J a.. C» :J tI) c.n ~ nZ = ::c ~r-t~ ~ > Þ-3 en Z ::c t:J w- e:: -- ::::J ~ = 0.. - Q) -rOOJ -'(þ .., ~ -- Q) 0...., .... N co -. :J -. ::I -c -, "EXIIIIIIBIT C" DIAGRAMS Figure 4. Visibility and Access Easement - Davis Blvd. and North Tarrant Pkwy. 10'~ Paved surface wi\h cross slopes between 2% and 5%. Sidewalk meandel1l inside \he 24 ft. parkway, Figure 5. Sidewalk Diagram ... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ',-- Department: Parks and Recreation Department Council Meeting Date: 12-11-95 Subject: N RH20 Report and Recommendations Agenda Number: GN 95-152 The NRH20 Family Water Park 1995 Season Synopsis and 1996 Policy and Facility Enhancement Recommendations, has been prepared by staff and attached for your review. This report summarizes and evaluates the effectiveness of our marketing efforts, the on-park revenue centers, customer satisfaction, guest surveys, financial performance and attendance for the 1995 inaugural season. This report also presents to Council the policy, service and facility enhancement recommendations, based on guest feedback and staff analysis, for the upcoming 1996 season. Accurately estimating the cost and designing the proposed facility enhancements can best be accomplished through the assistance of the original project architects and engineers. Staff would like to request authorization to contract with Brinkley-Sargent Architects to develop an enhancement projects budget and to design those improvements ultimately recommended by staff and approved by City Council. The proposed contract for the architectural and engineering services would be $26,862, plus reimbursable expenses. In order to address design services for the work that the scope is indeterminate at this time, ,~ an allowance would be allocated in the contract, on an hourly basis, not to exceed a total of $5,000. Staff also recommends that these professional services be expanded in the near future to include conceptual master planning for the full future development of NRH20. Updating and expanding the current master plan for NRH20 provides the best opportunity for providing cost efficiencies for future attractions. This process would enable us to design for maximum entertainment potential while maintaining the well planned, open and comfortable environment our guests enjoy. Although the specifically recommended elements and attractions may change over time; we will have planned for appropriate infrastructure, support facilities, and cost efficiency in shared physical plants for filtration through a pro-actively designed master plan. The cost for this service would be approximately $13,000. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other '~ h ~q .a.____ ~ Department Head Signature C"YCOUNC~ACnON"EM FlMnce Dlrectot Page 1 of d CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS "'--, The Aquatic Park Enterprise Fund includes $325,000, within the 1995 retained earnings, which has been allocated for Capital Improvement Projects for the park. These funds were planned to finance future improvements at NRH20 and are available to fund some of the recommended projects. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council: (1) Review the report and approve the recommended policies and pricing for the 1996 season. (2) Approve the addition of a new waterslide attraction and design services for other recommended park enhancements and amend the 95/96 Capital Project Budget in the amount of $325,000 for these projects. Funding will be provided from the Aquatic Park Enterprise Fund - Reserve for Aquatic CIP. (3) Authorize an agreement with Brinkley-Sargent Architects for professional services in the amount of $26,862, with an hourly allowance not to exceed $5,000, for design of the proposed facility enhancements and to move forward in negotiating services for updating the NRH20 Master Plan. '-- Attachment CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page ;;L of ~ N RH~OFam ilyWater'~ªrk c ~1tA5:SI . '\¡hOp· ¢;~r ';-:'»««~'::~>:-:::::,::::::'<:,::' ,<':::: :"':~ ::: ~ "-' ::;~:.;~~;;:::~~;><:,::::::,:,::> ::': :: -:~: -::. -;: ':' .~,.~ :: ': ., ~''/ Ft. Worth Star Telegram October 25, 1995 A Liquid Asset W HAT would you call a venture that exceeded its own ,attendance goals by more than 30 percent and had an almost per~ fect score when it asked its customers if they were satisfied with ,the experience? Well, we would call that a smashing success. < We also would call it NRHzO. , ~ The water~theme park owned by the residents of North Rich~ land Hills recently completed its first season, and early figures 't.., . "",."",- -'-"'-'1 '1tt?'.,,:. ,..... " : . indicate thatiiexceeded everyone's wildest expectations. khas paid its own way, and much',.lore. ' , ) _~; The p~rk was flooded with about 185,000 customers during the ·first summer - more than 40,000 more than predictions. Rev~ è~ues came in at about $1.8 million, with a surplus of $179,000. . that profit will be used for expansion of the park, a self-insurance :program, and the Parks and Recreation Department's capital i!llprovement program. _ The w~ter park also received high marks from more than 1,000 randomly chosen customers, earning an average score of 4.9 on a ~ scale of 1 .to 5. The customers recommended expansion, additional ,shaded arèas and an area to store coolers, according to the surveys. _ The city has hit two home runs, with the building of Iron 'Horse Golf Course and now NRHzO. Both, as planned, are pay- 'trig their own way. North Richland Hills is achieving its goal of ),eing a destination city, attracting people from other cities to come there and spend their money. This is the way government is supposed to work. G- NRHzO Family Water Park 1995 Season Review and 1996 Planning Report 1995 Season Synopsis Marketing, Advertising and Promotions NRH20 had a very balanced marketing plan, advertising on radio, television, newspaper, direct mail and billboards. This marketing effort not only helps the water park, but also creates awareness about the city of North Richland Hills and what it has to offer. Many of our guests would not normally come to North Richland Hills, but with the water park, we were able to let these people become more familiar with our city. One of the park's biggest promotions of the year was a two dollar off coupon on over four million Dr. Pepper cans. These cans were distributed from Denton to Waco, blanketing the Metroplex. Our logo and coupon took up a third of the can, where no one would miss the offer. These cans were an added advertising value, assisting us in promoting our park to areas we would not be able to reach. Along with the cans, Dr. Pepper provided in-store point-of-sale signs and radio commercials on 94.1 KL TV radio station promoting our offer. The cans were valid Mondays through Wednesdays only, to help us increase traffic on what are typically slower days. The efforts of the cans worked, prompting Wednesdays, to be the third busiest day of the entire week, only behind Fridays and Saturdays. NRH20 had several successful promotions over the summer. The first was a combined effort between us and the Northeast Tarrant Fort Worth Star-Telegram. We received an entire special section about the park, but more importantly, we were able to raise money for a couple of charities, one being our Youth at Risk program. The second successful special event was the Grand Opening Celebration. On this day, we had Leon Lett and Bill Bates from the Dallas Cowboys and Tatu, the soccer star of the Dallas Sidekicks sign autographs and country sensation, LeAnn Rimes for an evening concert. Radio stations 94.1 KL TY and 99.5 KPLX had live on-site broadcasts during the day. This resulted in the busiest Saturday of the season. The third special event was the Cartoon Network's Dive-In theater. They previewed the next generation of cartoons with a very festive atmosphere. Children could have their picture taken with some of the older cartoon characters such as Dino, that zany dinosaur from the Flintstones. Children and adults loved this promotion and we had an excellent crowd despite it threatened to rain much of the evening. We received two very positive front page articles in the Northeast Tarrant Fort Worth Star-Telegram for the event. Group Events Presold birthday parties were extremely popular with families. We sold 250 parties which averaged out to over three parties a day for the entire season. We took care of all aspects of the party, all the guests had to do was show up and have fun, which they did! We had several group catered events, however, since we were new to the market and people were still learning about us, we should see a sizable increase in the number of these events for the 1996 season. On-Park Profit Centers Arcade The NRH20 arcade was located at the front gate entrance. The arcade contained a wide variety of games, but steered clear of the graphically violent games that might have attracted the wrong crowd, and would have been inappropriate for younger guests. Unfortunately the video game market is not also NRH20's market. Video games appeal to young male teenagers which were not abundant in the park. A one year contract was signed with Mountasia to split the revenues form the arcade if they provided all of the equipment and service. NRH20's revenue was $6,100. Food Service The NRH20 Food Service department consisted of the main concession area and two cart locations. The department generated $191,125.03 in food sales and $79,304.77 in beverage sales. The revenue grand total for the food service department was $270,429.80. Food service labor averaged 53.1909 percent of the Revenue function's total labor cost of $210,132.54 with the total cost for food service labor of $111,771.29. The total cost charged for food supplies was $82,725.83. Total labor cost plus total supplies cost was $194,497.12 which equates to $75,932.68 in a positive balance. The beverage vendor was Dr. Pepper which offered excellent support as well as products. The ice cream vendor was Dreyers ice cream and Lemon Chill which was distributed by Sunbelt Distributors. The concession stand sold an extensive menu which included hamburgers, hot dogs, nachos, chicken sandwiches, chili cheese dogs, pizza, corny dogs, and french fries. Guests could also purchase snack items such as ice cream, cookies, and pretzels from the concession stand. The kitchen is equipped with a grill and fryer along with a conveyer oven for fresh made pizzas. The number one seller in the concession stand was the pizzas sold by the slice followed by cheese and jalapeno nachos. Other popular menu items were the hamburger Value Meals and Fun Meals for the kids. There were three windows to serve NRH20's guests, which at times did not seem sufficient due to the park's high daily attendances. The concession stand began serving hot lunches everyday at 11 :00 a.m. and stayed open for the guests the remainder of the day. Page 2 The two cart locations sold snack items to the hot and hungry guests. The Lemon Chill cart sold Lemon Chills, Strawberry Chills, and Cherry Chills. The Lemon Chill product was the number one food and snack seller. NRH20 sold 13,000 Lemon Chills at $2.50 each. Bottled water, Arizona Ice Tea, and Quick Kicks were also sold at the Lemon Chill cart. The Dr. Pepper cart sold fountain drinks such as Dr. Pepper, 7 UP, and RC Cola in two sizes - 16 oz. and 24 oz. Novelty ice cream was also sold at the Dr. Pepper cart. The novelty ice cream which included Drumsticks, Nestle Crunch Bars, and Flintstones Push Ups was the second best seller in the food and snack category for the entire park at almost 12,000 units. These numbers prove the popularity of snack and impulse items in amusement parks. The healthier items such as salad and a broiled chicken sandwich were the lowest in sales. The Food Service department also provided catering services to several large groups ranging in sizes from thirty five people to two hundred. The catering staff grilled hamburgers and hotdogs at the Picnic Pavilion to be served to the groups. The menu also included potato salad, beans, chips, and ice cream. NRH20 offered several catering packages which gave the groups the opportunity to choose their menu. All food service locations sold their products with all sales tax already included in the price as a service to the guests. NRH20's guests were highly appreciative of the pricing strategy which was competitive with local fast food restaurants and less expensive than the typical amusement park. The prices allowed large families to eat in the park without a substantial investment. Gift Shop The NRH20 Gift Shop had a successful first season. The Gift Shop provided NRH20's guests with useful products such as Banana Boat suntan lotion, Regal sunglasses, and NRH20 beach safes in an air conditioned shop. For the fashion conscience guest colorful hats, fun jewelry, and cover ups were available to add to their summer wardrobe. The Gift Shop also sold a variety of custom made logo t-shirts that appealed to all ages from toddlers to adults. The best selling t-shirt was a white shirt with a large three color NRH20 logo on the front. Aqua socks and water sandals were sold to protect the guest's feet against blisters and burnt toes. Children of all ages found an assortment of entertaining toys and interesting candy in the Gift Shop. NRH20's Gift Shop generated $49,760 in revenue for the park. The number one seller in the Gift Shop was the Big Squirt which sold over 4,500 pieces priced at $4.99 each and generated $22,560. The Big Squirt is a water toy that children fill at the Big Squirt fill station, and use to cool themselves and their friends off during the Summer heat. Candy of all types comprised almost 15% of the Gift Shop dollar sales. Various novelty candies such as gummy worms, Warheads, and candy sharks appealed to the more Page 3 adventurous. The biggest candy sellers were the branded chocolate candy such as Hershey and Reeses. The least popular item in the Gift Shop was the NRH20 tote bag which will be the first candidate for next season's side walk sales. Some new items being considered for next year include swim wear, more candy, the latest toys, and new fashions as well as a variety of displays to promote the various items available in the shop. Inner Tube Rentals Forty-eight inch diameter inner tubes were rented to the guests from the Tube Rental building to be used in the Endless River and the Wave Pool. Inner Tube Rentals generated $113,210. Tubes were rented for $3.00 a day and a $1.00 deposit which was returned when the guest returned the tube. To ensure that our guests were protected from inner tube theft, the wrist band method which is used in water parks across the nation was utilized. When a guest rented a tube, the staff member would place a water proof wrist band on their wrist which could only be removed with scissors. Only guests wearing the wrist bands in the park, could use an inner tube. If a guest lost their tube, or their tube was taken then they could return to the tube rental building for another tube. This policy freed the guests from babysitting their tubes while they were not using them. Locker Rentals Lockers were rented to the guests from a window in the Gift Shop. Locker Rentals generated $38,147. The lockers were large enough to store a family's belongings. For the guest's convenience, a key entry system was used so that the guests could access the lockers anytime they desired during the day. The lockers were rented for $2.00 a day with a $1.00 deposit which was returned when the guests returned the key to the Gift Shop. A challenge in the beginning was that guests did not always lock their lockers properly. To alleviate this problem, signs with explicit directions were posted in the locker room, the directions were handed to every guest with each key, and an attendant was posted in the locker room to help guests with their lockers and to patrol the lockers. After these measures were taken, the challenge was alleviated. Staff Peñormance and Benefits Our staff received a 4.62 guest service score out of a possible 5. This is an excellent score for a first year facility. However, it leaves us room to improve to reach up closer to the magical 5 out of 5. Although there are several contributing factors, the most noteworthy is our staff. The 200 plus seasonal staff members came into contact with many more guests than any supervisory personnel could hope to contact. This presents us with many opportunities to either exceed the guests' expectations or not Page 4 reach that level. That is why our seasonal staff is so important. We will be presenting new opportunities to provide our staff with better accommodations and more opportunities. Currently we provided staff with discounts to area attractions, free passes to NRH20, a trade-out with Mountasia, a dive-in movie just for them and staff events at NRH20. Financial Performance, Pricing and Attendance NRH20 enjoyed a phenomenal success in its inaugural season. We recorded an operating income of $556,697 on $1,767,831 in revenue. With an attendance of 185,375 we brought in $9.54 per guest on average. We exceeded the revised projections in admissions with a large percentage received from returning resident guests. Our operating expenses totaled $1,211,133. Using the attendance we spent $6.53 per guest on operating expenses. The majority of our operating expenses is in labor as was expected. Part of our success is attributed to our guest service and personal contact and this can only be achieved with a larger staff. As previously mentioned the 1995 season attendance was 185,375. With an operating season of 81 days this averages out to be 2,288 guests per day. The highest single day attendance total was 3,701 on Friday, August 11. On average Fridays were the heaviest attended days with Saturday, Thursday, Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Monday following in descending order. Please refer to Appendix A for complete 1995 financial performance. Guest Surveys The results of the surveys were good. The survey consisted of fourteen questions. The surveys were to obtain how guests felt about our services and park and how many people came with them, how long they stayed at the water park, where they came from, how they found out about us and any suggestions on improving NRH20. The average age of those surveyed is 31.47. This is a good balance of age in people surveyed. We did not want to get too many people of anyone age range, but a broad spectrum. Of those interviewed, 64% were women and 36% were men. Where are you from? Approximately 35% of our attendance consisted of North Richland Hills residents. This gives us a good idea about how positively we were received by the people who passed the half cent sales tax. Fort Worth and Not From Area also had strong responses. (See Appendix B & C) What radio station do you listen to most often? KL TY's format is contemporary Christian and has a large family base. We received excellent frequency from this Page 5 station and they matched what we spent with them for allowing their logo on our Dr Pepper cans. This station was a perfect fit with our target market and we are pleased with their performance. On June 17, our grand opening, KL TV had a live broadcast and it helped us have our best Saturday and third best overall day of the season. We would like to use KL TV again for the 1996 season. The second radio station on which we advertised was KPLX 99.5. KPLX is a country format and has been established in the Metroplex for many years. The country format is the number one listened to format in the Metroplex. The number one station in the market is a country format. KPLX is a very family oriented station and they are a very promotion oriented station. They helped us acquire Bill Bates, Leon Lett and Tatu for our Grand Opening celebration as well as country signer LeAnn Rimes. KPLX by far, was the most aggressive radio station in helping us find and secure sponsors for our inaugural season. How did you find out about NRH20? Word of mouth was the number one way our guests found out about NRH20. This reinforces how important it is to make sure our guests have a great time at our park. We are happy that word of mouth was so high, signaling that most of our guests did have a good enough of a time to recommend us to their family and friends. Whose idea was it to visit NRH20? The number one person whose idea it was to visit NRH20 was the children followed by the mother. The mother however, is the most important person in the decision process. Though the children have the idea, the mother is the one who approves the decision. Also, the mother was a strong number two in who's idea it was to visit the park. These results fit well with how we used our media. Television was targeted primarily to children with radio being targeted to the mothers. Television was used for children since they respond better to both visual and audio messages, while mothers who are either at work or running errands in their car will listen to the radio. With cable being so affordable, we were also able to advertise on some family channels where we could reach the moms. Fathers figured in the decision process at fifth after kids, moms, friends and the entire family/everyone. Fathers seem to be more active in the decision process during the weekend than the weekdays, since this when they are at work. How many hours did you stay today? The average length of stay was 4.56 hours. This length of stay is good for us in creating more revenue opportunities within the park. For a five hour stay, people are going to be bound to want an ice cream or Dr Pepper. Page 6 How many people came with you today? The average number of people per group was 4.04. This fit well with our family four season pass. On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being outstanding, how would you rate NRH20's attractions and facilities? Our attractions and facilities were rated a 4.26 out of five. This reinforces we built the appropriate attractions for the families visiting our park. On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being outstanding, how would you rate NRH20's customer service and courtesy of employees? Our customer service rating was a 4.62 out of five. This high number could not have been achieved without the great team effort of all departments. We had several positive comments on the courteousness of our staff from our guests. This number reflects those positive statements. On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being outstanding, how would you rate NRH20's quality of concessions? Concession ratings were 3.67 out of five. One of the possibilities for this number being lower than the others is many guests did not like the no cooler policy, causing them to rate our concessions lower in protest to this policy. Overall,61.28% rated the concessions either a four or a five, which shows the majority were very satisfied with our concession area. Did you find NRH20 admission pricing inexpensive, reasonable, or expensive? 73% of our guests found our admission pricing reasonable with 17.84% finding our pricing inexpensive. This demonstrates our guests felt like they got a great value for their dollar. This helps us with our family position in the fact we are priced affordable for a family. Did you find concession pricing inexpensive, reasonable, or expensive? 60.15% found our concession pricing reasonable with 33.16% finding it expensive. Compared to other amusement attractions and movie theaters in the area, our prices are much more reasonable than these places. Will you revisit NRH20? 96.74% guests said they would revisit NRH20, with only 2.57% saying they would not revisit. Some of those who said they would not revisit were guests visiting family in the area and would not be back this summer. The average age of those who said they would not revisit was 31.25. Will you recommend NRH20 to a friend? 97.07% said they would recommend NRH20 to a friend or family. This reflects why word of mouth was the number one way people found out about our park. This is extremely important in our marketing effort. No marketing in the world is successful if you don't have a quality product and this Page 7 demonstrates that our park is a quality family attraction. 2.76% that said they would not recommend our park to family or friends. The majority said they would not recommend our park because it is family oriented and not fun for teens. The average age of these people is 25.81. Do you have any suggestions or comments on how to improve your time at NRH20? Allowing coolers in the park was the number one suggestion of our guests. Expansion of the park was a close second. Improve the slide lines, add more shade and have a smoking area rounded out the top five comments. Please see Appendix D for breakdown of Guest Comments. Page 8 1996 Projections We currently are projecting $1,749,605 in revenue for the 1996 season and $1,170,106 in expenses. As the season grows nearer we plan to revise the budget accordingly. From the feasibility study we find that our projected 1996 attendance is 188,700. If you factor that the 1995 season's attendance exceed the original projection, we can estimate that our 1996 season's attendance will be in excess of 200,000. 1996 Recommendations Capital Improvements We are currently researching several different options for 1996 capital improvements. The projects are based on feedback from the guest surveys and our staff surveys. All of the projects are designed to either improve the quality of the park or the service provide inside the park. We have met with the architects for the project, Brinkley- Sargent Architects, and they estimating the cost for the enhancements. Listed below are the highlights. Arcade Conversion to an Ice Cream Shop At this time, the prime space used for the arcade could be better utilized as a stronger revenue center. We are suggesting that the arcade be turned into a ice cream snack shop to offer more food service to our guests and also serve as a better profit center. Clock Tower/Guest Service Area The area serves a wide variety of needs. A frequent request was for a large clock inside the park that could be seen from multiple locations. This area will also provide us with better guest contact, lost and found, information and other guest service needs. Currently the guest must enter the office area. This needs to be avoided because during the season, the park office is the cash control area and it needs to have as little traffic as possible. This new area will also give us a permanent location for lost children that is visible from the entire park. New Attraction A waterslide where the riders can ride double on an innertube is recommended for next year. This type of ride will appeal to all age groups especially the family. With this attraction, a parent can ride double with his/her child. This is a relatively inexpensive attraction compared to the larger uphill water coasters or multi-family slide. This attraction is planned to exist in the same area as our current waterslides and possibly terminate in a "runout" instead of a "catch pool". Along with the design for this new attraction we plan to incorporate an enlarged stairway so that we can reroute the queue line for the black slide to the new tower. This will allieviate the challenges we faced this year. Page 9 Enlarged Shaded Area We need more shaded seating area. This need can be filled two ways. The first is to move the existing Funbrella located outside the park and the one located in storage into the park providing more covered seating area. The second way is to enlarge the fenced in area on the southwest corner of the property to include more of the natural area. This natural area will be prepped and more picnic tables will be added. We visited a park in Florida that used a similar plan and it was very successful. It provides a seating area in which you do not feel crowded. Food Service Shade Structure We are planning a shade enclosure for the food service lines. The guests do not like to wait in line in an area where there is no shade. With this information in mind we are planning a tiered shade structure that will complement the park's architecture. Enlarged Staff Break Area Our staff's performance is pivotal to the success of the park. Because of this, we are recommending that a new staff break area be created. The current break area is much too small to be properly utilized. Located in the Maintenance area, the new break area will provide seating for over 20 staff members at one time. This will be an air conditioned area and will have drink machines and snack machines. In addition to vending machines, we are reexamining the possibility of allowing the staff to purchase food at the main food building for a discounted rate. Last year that policy was discontinued because of the guest demand. If the new break area is constructed, we plan on using the existing break area for a lead and supervisor office. Miscellaneous Improvements · Additional Drainage · Semi-permanent front gate queue lines · Additional fencing around food and beverages · Enlarged pass-through food service window · Exterior lighting at the Maintenance building · A lockable enclosure for the computer network system · Slide tower shade structure Pricing When we examine our per capita expenditures for each guest we find that it is $6.53 per guest. This expense is greater than some of our current pricing. With a resident adult paying $4.95 per visit and a resident child paying $3.95 per visit we lose $1.58 per resident adult visitor and $2.58 per resident child visitor. This is assuming that the per cap received towards any on park purchases is negligible. We support that with the idea that the closer the guest lives to NRH20 the more likely they are to either eat before or bring whatever they need and not visit the gift shop or food and drink stands. Based on this knowledge, we are recommending that the resident discount be reduced Page 10 to reflect a $6.95 price for resident adults and $5.95 for resident children. This will still result in a loss of $.58 per resident child visitor but will bring our prices in line. We will also add a child's group price of $5.95 and this will make the group pricing equal to the resident pricing alleviating the problems with defining who is a resident and who is a non-resident. Currently the group price does not differentiate between adults and children or residents and non-residents. The current group price is $6.95. This caused a challenge with groups composed of residents and non-residents. The groups thought that they could receive the resident rate for the whole group and this was not the case. With the proposed changes, the resident discount will be approximately 25-30 percent and will be in line with Iron Horse Golf Course that offers a 25-30 percent discount to residents depending on the day of the week. In addition, the Recreation Center offers a $2.00 discount to residents for each program. Service Enhancements Professor Frogstein and the Elements of Fun To better take care of the guest, a new function is planned for the Marketing division for the 1996 season. In combination with a proposed capital improvement project, we are planning to add a service enhancement that will handle guest service oriented questions, plan staff events, entertain the guest and deliver birthday parties. The addition of the new function should enable us to better utilize current positions by reallocating existing duties to the new function. This enhancement will include a mascot and support staff that will go throughout the park entertaining the children without imposing on guests who are enjoying a relaxing time. We also plan on entertaining the guests while they are waiting in line both at the front gate and in food lines. The mascot will also be able to add additional value for birthday parties. If the guest desires it, we will provide the mascot for pictures or just for general entertainment. Additionally, the mascot provides external marketing opportunities in schools, malls, etc. Coolers In response to our number one request from the guest (24 percent from our surveys), we are recommending that coolers be allowed into the park. We continually must remind ourselves that this park only will continue to function with the initial success that it generated if we continue to offer the guests what they want. We are prepared to meet that additional challenges that will arise from allowing coolers into the park, and think that this policy adjustment is manageable. Managing the new policy will require additional front gate and park service staff to allow us to efficiently search the coolers upon entry and manage the extra trash throughout the park. Alcohol and glass containers are the key items that we will look for and if found, will not be allowed on park premises. Anticipated food and beverage sales reductions could possibly be offset by increased attendance and purchase of more snack items such as ice cream products, etc. through the new ice cream snack shop. Page 11 Appendix A CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS NRH20 WATER PARK STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,1995 1995 21-00-00-4010 Admissions - Residents (209,779.60) 21-00-00-4110 Adv. Sales Season Pass Resident (103,830.10) 21-00-00-4020 Admissions - Nonresidents (770,183.55) 21-00-00-4120 Adv.Sales Season Pass Nonresident (94,882.60) 21-00-00-4100 Advanced Sales 0.00 21-00-00-4130 Advance Sales Group Packages (59,528.62) 21-00-00-4131 Birthday Party Group Revenue (21,279.55) Admissions Revenue (1,259,484.02) 21-00-00-4200 Tube Rental Income (113,210.22) 21-00-00-4300 Locker Fees (38,147.91) Rental Income (151,358.13) 21-00-00-4150 Resident I 0 Cards (55.00) 21-00-00-4160 River Walk Run Revenue (80.00) 21-00-00-4170 Water Aerobic Class Revenue (497.50) 21-00-00-4175 Swim Class Revenue (590.00) 21-00-00-4180 Game Machine Revenue (6,057.26) 21-00-00-4190 Season Pass Replacement Fees (303.00) 21-00-00-4800 Other Income (3,821.78) 21-00-00-4810 Other Income - Sales Tax Disc (481.48) 21-00-00-4950 Over/Short (4,163.00) 21-00-00-5200 Discounts Taken 0.00 Miscellaneous Income (16,049.02) 21-00-00-4005 Sponsorship Revenues (750.00) 21-00-00-4811 Special Event Revenue 0.00 21-00-00-4812 Donations - Sunbelt 0.00 21-00-00-4813 Donations - Other 0.00 21-00-00-4815 Corporate Donations Dr Pepper (20,000.00) Sponsorships/Donations (20,150.00) 21-00-00-4400 Beverage Sales (79,304.77) 21-00-00-4500 Food Sales (191,125.03) 21-00-00-4600 Merchandise Sales (49,760.23) Food, Beverage & Gift Shop Revs (320,190.03) Total Operating Revenues (1,161,831.20) Page 1 NRH20DET.WK4 // ~/' 21-01-01-4005 21-01-01-4010 21-01-01-4100 21-01-01-4500 21-01-01-4650 21-01-01-4800 21-01-01-4810 21-01-01-4811 21-01-01-4812 21-01-01-4813 21-01-01-4815 21-01-01-4850 21-01-01-4885 21-02-01-4100 21-02-01-4300 21-02-01-4500 21-02-01-4650 21-02-01-4750 21-02 -0 1-4850 21-02-01-4910 21-02-01-4920 21-03-01-4010 21-03-01-4100 21-03-01-4300 21-03-01-4500 21-03-01-4650 21-03-01-4750 21-03-01-4850 21-03-01-4910 21-03-01-4920 21-01-01-1020 21-01-01-1030 21-01-01-1040 21-01-01-1070 21-01-01-1080 21-01-01-1150 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NRH20 WATER PARK STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 3D, 1995 1995 Special Sponsorships Events Advertising In-Service Training General Liability Insurance Hiring Expense Special Services Donation Expenses Dr Pepper Special Event Expenses Donation - Exp - Sunbelt Donation - Exp - Other Donation Expense - Dr Pepper Telephone Service Credit Card Service Fees In-Service Training Electric Service General Liability Insurance Hiring Expense Rental Equipment Telephone Service Water Purchases Sewage Treatment Advertising In-Service Training Electric Service General Liability Insurance Hiring Expense Rental Equipment Telephone Service Water Purchases Sewage Treatment Contractual Services Salaries/Div & Operations Salaries-Supervisory Salaries-Skilled And Crafted Salaries Overtime Salaries/Part Time Temporary FICA Expense Page 2 674.00 129,491.23 966.15 14,459.30 216.32 10,177.42 2,151.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,278.10 5,726.68 3,286.63 5,545.24 48,395.88 28,162.99 11,508.86 1,121.60 56.90 18,741.91 3,713.21 0.00 619.00 0.00 6,277.25 375.00 0.00 20.81 0.00 0.00 302,966.34 0.00 42,829.88 0.00 0.00 30,130.88 2,854.59 NRH20DET. WK4 21-01-01-1160 21-01-01-1170 21-01-01-1180 21-01-01-1190 21-02-01-1020 21-02 -01-1030 21-02-01-1040 21-02-01-1080 21-02-01-1150 21-02-01-1160 21-02-01-1170 21-02-01-1180 21-02-01-1190 21-03-01-1020 21-03-01-1030 21-03-01-1040 21-03-01-1080 21-03-01-1150 21-03-01-1160 21-03-01-1170 21-03-01-1180 21-03-01-1190 21-01-01-3440 21-01-01-3560 21-02-01-3020 21-02 -01-3040 21-02-01-3420 21-02 -01-3460 21-02 -01-3465 21-02-01-3480 21-02-01-3510 21-02 -01-3520 21-02-01-3560 21-02 -0 1-3580 21-02-01-3600 21-03-01-3420 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NRH20 WATER PARK STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 1995 Tmrs Retirement Taxable Benefits Clearing Hospitalization Insurance Worksmens Compensation Ins S~laries/Div & Operations Salaries-Supervisory Salaries-Skilled And Crafted Salaries/Part Time Temporary FICA Expense Tmrs Retirement Taxable Benefits Clearing Hospitalization Insurance Worksmens Compensation Ins Salaries/Div & Operations Salaries-Supervisory Salaries-Regular, Full-Time Salaries/Part Time Temporary FICA Expense Tmrs Retirement Taxable Benefits Clearing Hospitalization Insurance Worksmens Compensation Ins Personal Services Office Equipment Maintenance Security Equipment Maintenance Building Maintenance Grounds Maintenance Small Equipment Maintenance Radio Maintenance Equipment Maintenance Sign/Fence/Sidewalk Maintenance Plumbing Repair & Maint Electrical Repair & Maint Security Equipment Maintenance Overhead Door Maint Swimming Pool Maint Small Equjpment Maintenance Page 3 4,469.03 0.00 9,120.00 4,200.00 0.00 24,317.53 0.00 184,633.58 14,381.20 2,789.18 0.00 6,080.00 33,132.00 0.00 46,903.14 0.00 125,699.35 10,297.07 5,293.98 0.00 3,040.00 18,899.00 569,070.41 1,929.42 155.94 6,569.12 159.16 431.93 922.22 332.58 2,400.50 878.35 643.47 120.00 0.00 0.00 452.84 NRH20DET.WK4 21-03-01-3460 21-03-01-3510 21-03-01-3520 21-03-01-3560 21-00-00-6000 21-01-01-6400 21-01-01-2100 21-01-01-2200 21-01-01-2300 21-01-01-2500 21-01-01-2600 21-01-01-2850 21-01-01-2900 21-02-01-2100 21-02-01-2150 21-02-01-2200 21-02-01-2500 21-02-01-2600 21-02-01-2700 21-02-01-2900 21-02-01-2910 21-02-01-2920 21-02-01-2930 21-03-01-2050 21-03-01-2080 21-03-01-2100 21-03-01-2150 21-03-01-2200 21-03-01-2510 21-03-01-2600 21-03-01-2700 21-03-01-2900 21-03-01-2910 21-03-01-2950 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NRH20 WATER PARK STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,1995 Radio Maintenance Plumbing Repair & Maint Electrical Repair & Maint Security Equipment Maintenance Prior Year Expenditure (Ene) Machinery And Equipment Maintenance Chemical Supplies Clothing Supplies Data Processing Supplies Educational Supplies General Office Supplies Motor Vehicle Supplies Miscellaneous Supplies Chemical Supplies Medical/First Aid Supplies . Clothing Supplies Educational Supplies General Office Supplies Janitorial Supplies Miscellaneous Supplies Safety Equipment Pool Supplies Aquatic Park Supplies Food Supplies - Aquatic Park Merchandise - Aquatic Park Chemical Supplies Medical/First Aid Supplies Clothing Supplies Special Event Supplies General Office Supplies Janitorial Supplies Miscellaneous Supplies Safety Equipment Special Group Expenses Supplies Page A 1995 0.00 0.00 9.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,005.45 0.00 315.35 2,607.97 460.95 6,016.14 0.00 2,185.68 25,664.05 637.11 4,737.64 2,037.02 23.79 3,616.83 3,296.94 1,623.87 917.69 10,644.24 82,725.83 27,208.98 7.63 58.84 6,461.57 4,946.68 42.21 177.05 3,478.29 0.00 0.00 189,892.35 NRH20DET. WK4 CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS NRH20 WATER PARK STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 1995 21-02-01-7000 Depreciation Expense 134,199.00 Depreciation 134,199.00 Total Operating Expenses 1,211,133.55 Operating Income (556,697.65) 21-00-00-4850 Interest Income (10,806.30) Interest Income (10,806.30) Total Non-operating ExpenseJ(Revenuen (10,806.30) Income before Transfers (567,503.95) 21-00-00-3821 Transfer From Parks Dev Fund (67,700.00) Operating Transfers In (67,700.00) 21-00-00-3822 Transfer To Parks/Rec Dev Fund 179,609.00 Operating Transfers Out 179,609.00 Net Income (455,594.95) 21-00-00-0596 Reserved RJE - CIP (325,000.00) 21-00-00-0598 Reserved R/E - Insurance (75,000.00) 21-00-00-0599 Retained Earnings 400,000.00 Retained Earnings BOY 0.00 Retained Earnings EOY (455,594.95) Page 5 NRH20DET.WK4 ~ ><: .,., "C ¡:: Q p. p. < .J'~; ~~) .. .~ '-.. ~ v ~ ~J(~A:¿ ---;-r" -UFMAN ~ « ..)~A'" _. H tv"" _YJi~('f~1 il~i - ~{. 1 ,~{ A~ro\ , ~-r.,,_ ø ~/-._~ u. _~l':r ¡II '~ z ~ ~ l' .... . 1 :( (i) '~\ \.hK1i'i ( .... "-.-;;- 1/ i~J~ L, ' :ìí -'1- - /.:/,)~ - .i"': I = , ; _~:~._ r~ ..... ~;. :-~ -.'.'~~..' ~']i '-.J ~;. I. .t/) -:- ¡ L-;¡ li® r'"'-· 10.:,.. ~#L!~' . H ~~I~' ~ f} : ?: ,I)' , !§.. ." I Ii:! . '-L~£~; -~5ì§ f [ Jl A'Ja !l'~:;: ~"-' ~ A-~, .....:~ f l' .. ~ (} ~ ¡ .- -~t - .' t 'Œ1 ~\;:: ~¡¡ L i:....¿;.' , <~ r~,,·- ,"" - _§ 1-- ..... I ¡J -, .; ~f!¡~' --- ~I j ~ ~ ,~', I ~~1~~ ~ .1. i J~2'" ~j JTJj ~ nl ji : -~' ~'·';I:II:~.~I_ k r~-! .;0;;:.....,. Äæ¡~ . ¡I'! SlI.:".'x:t', ¡_~u ~l~~.lt In: : u n i -;11 it .~ ~~"..!';; .. ,', :. ~~(ii) COI.l. N 11.~ ~ ~ ~ å :"J ~ ,-, \' ^i ' " ~ -dr rr itJ' ~ Ih:f \~j ,.' ' ~~ \ 1"; ,/ u.¡¡." J) , ~ ~~~\ I i-ILr':~ 1)~1 ili-! ~ '. ~) J "Th,\ I ~ !~..r T """1..1 , t ~v~ í LI ~.! ~;' '-L '.J l' I --'" '-- .. -=iL-' : jt (G- -~~]i~; r. J ~ J~II~. _ t 1 .rlp In ) ;,!~./,r Ilf ~.fUJl'¡ .-.:. ~~ ~7 c- í .zfV' t ~'~i ' If .,' f II ~. ..,,". !" Wi; ß . ~'\ 1, fJ_-:. ~ r; ..~.. ,~ ~ - \Y ..Jt, -., J n \Ji~: j ~ J¡. ) ~ ! I '.., ". '.. .: ~~ ~ ·.11 R' ..,[ iIr;· j r) I. , ':'8-c,"'"i\.~. ' ~[ ~ilpt;J. 'J~~":;-"''- )¡~.. '~Ii~ '. ~Dl¡ß.~ "f,~¡' ~:," I i! Hi ¿:~~w-.~~.'-~W :~_i:;.~ r2.! ~ i' ¡= 'I;. S~~~ .~ { ;"~' . r;;:: ~ ~ -.{ 'A; ~ ! ~ :.L._ ~j II " IN' I .. If.. . . : V" f- 1--1 .., riÞJl ~ 11 · I ~. ~ ~.; " .~¡, .~. ¿~ÌiJUfi -114~' ª Z --'8 ) 1 ' ~.~ II"': c::1 ,. ..~.> ~ ~ I \,¡ . '~/' i ~I~ I:: ~ Pi" ./'-';;' ~ jJ I,I ~~ !} ~ ~¡ ·I~. '" ~t('i~ Jijl1 "':, Jl~LJim. ~ ~/ ,\'. ~ '~~í;~~~' It~'~ i ~ ~ "I~~~( I ¡c: ¡ --a; '-I. ¿]S¡ I ~ r 1 :~ ~m1_~ ""¡.~~' ,.. '----' ; ~ ¿~ù I ~ ~ª ~~~'''::5!5a;ét~~' g ¡ · 11.. _r .1; Þ : o -j' .r+!~ @~ J~~ i ' , ~ ~ s, ~ ~ I · U l lr.J 1~ ~~ . N. :,',' t.. '~ t G ~ · ~ .... ª(~ ~~:: g~ ~ 11 . 11' ~ r an ~ .... J~ ~ : ;~ ~[~~ ~ ..··IN>. ,. ~ ~ 11: OJ '~ "'" I ~ '! ~~l '~... ~ J ! I ì ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ö "... : ~, ~.....~_~I.. I ~ . ~ . l! I ,,~ )~!! .- --r ii '6 rn ' : "1 i' 11 / ,. A I 0 ~;.; I'·' I,!!~ ' ;}Lù.,,¡ :/ / ¡ " ( -1..-;e Lf 7\ lK..' ~r" ~.. !I -1._._______1 __ >.ITd i Jj! " \- ª "II> ;¡~ ¡1111 ~~F: jf I=f<-r-¡ ,'i '--'j r- "i 'Wi':,' j:g ihJ~' ~ 'j~iHi ~ â I " I 0 :':i::d ; ¡.~ ..:1; \ jg .~ H < " ~'\ ~.~ ~ nl ' ,",:~,: ~ I jl ,1' J ,~. ,~ .ii ~ . IJ!! IIi ~ !J.¡¡=i '-; · ~_ _ _, G "'- -t ==..- -, ¡jf-- =:::;. I~ ~'I!.. .,- I !~1~" - . ~ " , o )C =a c 8- D- c( ~ '#. ?f. ?J!. ?f. ?J!. ?f. ?J!. ?f. '#. ?f. ';fl. ?f. .,. ?J!. ?f. ?f. ?f. !z ~ ~ CD ~ ,.... N ~ ,.... ~ ~ ('t) N ~ ~ ~ CD ('t) ('t) CD ,.... 0 0 0 ~ ,.... 0 ,.... .-> ('t) ,.... m w CÕ N L() d ..¢ ~ N d N N M ~ N ç) ~ ~ M L() u a:: CO) ~ ~ w a. \'-. II) ~ ..J 0 ..J a:: 1: lL. C :J Z II) ~ ~ :) ..J Z ..J a:: J: W ~ ~ 1: < W ~ ..J W W W a:: u z ..J ~ § C Z U ..J C ~ < if ~ ~ ..J :) < a:: ..J ~ - Z 0 II) II) Gj 1: a:: > C) W ~ 0 0 :) II) 0 tñ C) w :) ~ < a:: a:: z lL. a:: ..J W ~ a. ~ z ..J II) ~ lL. W ~ :J 0 a:: ..J ..J ..J ~ a:: > ..J ~ J: ~ J: 0 a:: w < 0 < :J 0 < :J W ~ 0 ~ U Z < II) U U 0 W lL. C) 1: 1: a:: ~ ..J a:: II) ~ Z o .~ 'tJ r:: Q) 0. 0. « UI Q) ~ § Q) Q) (t (5 :2 Q) !!! o iii 'C <t o (t c> .5 -g g! .;¡ c: ~(te!!!~Q) ,g a.a.o E:5 <t ~ E :: U) 0 . . . Iiill . . (/) I- z W ~ ~ o Ü l- (/) W ::J C) ~ ?/. ... !é. en w z ~ :J w w c a: 0 c < <{ a: z :J J: W ~ en C) en z J: ~ W )2 Õ w a: ð 0 0 ¿ ~ a: (/) a. ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: Subject: Appointment to Planning & Zoning Commission and Agenda Number: Gapltallmprovement AdvIsory º9mmltte~_ 12/11/95 GN 95-153 Mr. James Brock has submitted his resignation to Mayor Brown creating a vacancy in Place 6 on the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee. Mr. Charles Owen has been recommended for appointment to Place 6. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council take action on the proposed appointment. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget _ Other T ~.fßÆ//'':' ~¿?---- Department Head Signatúre CnYCOUNC~ACTION"EM Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 Subject: Aw~rrJ Annl.::!1 Cn.,tr.:act for Letterhead and En\Jelopes Agenda Number: PU 95-76 Formal bids were solicited for an annual contract to supply letterhead, regular envelopes and window envelopes for all City Departments. The results are outlined below. Worth Business Forms $5,238 $5,412 $8,715 Sir Speedy Rainbow Graphics The specifications required the successful bidder to warehouse the letterhead and envelopes and deliver on an as need basis. Worth Business Forms met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and can have printing ready to deliver in 3 weeks. "- Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the annual contract to print letterhead and envelopes to Worth Business Forms in the amount of $5,238. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget -X- , rnh~ '¡jSJu '4 . ep ent Head Signature CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM Acct. Number Various Sufficient Funds Available FI....ce DiNc10r " Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS - Department: Finance / Support Services Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 Subject: Authori7A PLJrCh::l~A of Tr::l~tnr with I n::¡r'fAr Agenda Number: PU 95-77 On September 25, 1995 Council awarded a bid for a tractor to Zimmerer Kubota in the amount of $18,249 for the 1994/95 budget. In the 1995/96 approved budget Council appropriated funds for the purchase of an additional tractor with loader for the Parks Department. Zimmerer Kubota is offering to hold the bid price from the original bid for the purchase of this tractor and delivery can be made within two days. The specifications for this equipment are the same as requested in the original bid. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council authorize the purchase of one Kubota tractor with loader to Zimmerer Kubota in the amount of $18,249. -- Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) operatin. g Budget L íl .. Other -J:: &:.j ~ Departm":nt ~gnature CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM 06-01-03-6600 FIMllCIe Directot Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Support Services Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 Subject: Award Bid for Library I ighting Mnrfifi~;::¡tinn~. Ph;::¡~A II Agenda Number: PU 95-78 At the April 10, 1995 meeting Council awarded the bid for the Library Lighting Modificåtions to Groves Electrical Service (PU 95-28). Formal bids were solicited for Phase II of this project and the results are outlined below. Groves Electrical Service ~j¡il::¡gªz $11,390 Zachry Electrical Contractors Groves Electrical Service met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and can complete the project in sixty (60) days. Fundina Source: There was a balance of $9,978 in the project account after Phase I of the project was completed. The balance of $1,269 can be paid from Support Service electrical account. 13-70-95-6000 $9,978 $1,269 ',- 06-01-02-3520 Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for the Library Lighting Modifications, Phase II to Groves Electrical Service in the amount of $11,247. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget - f2 Other <:;j;;;:, 4I;'U ~ Department Head Signatur CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM See Above Finance Dnc10r Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~ Department: Finance / Support Services Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 Subject: Request from HIJdihllro r.hAvrnlAt tn Withdr::l"Y Rid Agenda Number: PU 95-79 In the 1995/96 approved budget Council appropriated funds for the purchase of 1996 vehicles. Formal bids were solicited for these replacement vehicles, and the bids were opened November 1 , 1995. During the evaluation process Hudiburg Chevrolet discovered an error in their bid for the C2500 pickups. They have requested to be allowed to officially withdraw the bid for the pickups (see attached letter). Recommendation: It is recommended City Council approve the request from Hudiburg Chevrolet to withdraw their bid for three C2500 pickups. i'- Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budg t _ , Other ~ VAil 1'- ~~~ignature . CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM FlnMca Director Page 1 of _u ,,----..., - FEE-17-'00 FRI 02:13 ID: TEL ¡'-JO: jß13 P01 HDIHURB CHEVROLET-CEO 77ee GRAPEVINE HWY. · FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76180 . 817/485-0400 . METRO 811/488-2400 "94'fViQe {;j 01,/( lJ4¿,{frfI,u·· Nove.ber 15, 1996 C1t Y Seer et ar y City of North Richland Hilla 7301 NE Loop 820 No~th Richland Hills, TX 76180 Re: Bid #85-604 - 1996 Vehicles Dear lis. Enos: Please withdraw Hudjbur( Chevrolet. Inc. 's bid regardlnc Item D. tor C2600 Pickup tor t16,799.00 and tor CC20963 for Extendod Pickup tor t18188.00. m~ Fred Davis Fleet Salea 811 498 2400 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Support Services Subject: Award Bid for 1996 VAhidAS Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 Agenda Number: PU 95-80 In the 1995/96 approved budget Council appropriated funds for the purchase of 1996 vehicles. Formal bids were solicited for the replacement vehicles and the results are outlined below. Hudiburg Chevrolet 4 each Tahoe $108,444 Æ::::f~J'P:::¡¡:8B $:::::::J:!l::t.MÆ1:R $ 92,478 $ 50,397 $ 20,200 11.]Iï~§§U 1 each Lumina 6 each C1500 Truck 3 each C2500 Truck 1 each Van 2 each Dump Truck Classic Chevrolet ~j¡Qß~ª2ª $ 17,666 $IiQìl~ 11~gg~~J.¡it ~¡~llf~J.~ª $108,058 Graff Five Star Chevrolet Ford No Bid No Bid No Bid $21,381 No Bid $83,802 No Bid $50,931 No Bid $20,703 $107,020 No Bid , The vehicles bid by Five Star Ford did not meet the minimum specifications in several areas. Ford does not offer training for City mechanics as part of their bid as requested in the specifications. Because of the request by Hudiburg Chevrolet to withdraw their bid on the C2500 pickups, Classic Chevrolet is the low bidder meeting specifications for these trucks. Hudiburg Chevrolet and Classic Chevrolet met all the minimum specifications and general conditions of the bid. Funding Source: 06-01-03-6600 09-75-02-6600 $375,489 $ 17,638 Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for the Lumina, and the dump trucks to Hudiburg Chevrolet in the amount of $124,048 and award the bid for the Tahoe, C1500 trucks, C2500 trucks and the van to Classic Chevrolet in the amount of $269,079 for a total amount of $393.127. Finance Review FlnMC8 Director Page 1 of Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget L Ì'-- Other --fJ--- Il -ç-~(/L1~J¡ ~ Department ¡::read Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 12-11-95 Subject: Award of Bid for Layout ::Jnd Printing of City Nl=!w~ll=!ttl=!r Agenda Number: PU 95-81 Over the past several years, the City has retained a consultant to produce a quarterly City newsletter. This fall, City staff developed an updated City newsletter, titled North Rich/and Hills, City of Choice. Unlike the prior newsletter, it was written and produced by City staff, and we believe it is more sophisticated in design and layout. The first "test" edition was intended to provide a framework for future newsletters. Any suggestions by City Council for refinement of the newsletter format or topics will be appreciated. North Rich/and Hills, City of Choice has been well received by the community. Formal bids for an annual contract have been solicited for printing and graphic layout services for the new newsletter format. Bids were solicited based on 4 and 6 page lengths and are priced per edition (Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter). The following bids for the quarterly newsletter were received: 4 Page Length 6 Page Length 1. Tarrant Printing $4,304 per edition $5,256 per edition "- 2. Worth Business Forms $3,858 per edition $6,898 per edition 3. Burns Graphics $4,347 per edition $7,193 per edition 4. AC Graphics $5,277 per edition $7,326 per edition Based on the bids received, Worth Business Forms is the most cost effective vendor for the 4 page length newsletter only. Tarrant Printing is the most cost effective vendor for the 6 page length and for any combination of 4 and 6 page length newsletters that might be produced during the course of the year. Tarrant Printing's six page bid was substantially lower than the other six page bids and staff verified Tarrant Printing's pricing with them. They said this is accurate and is not an error in bidding. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends awarding the annual contract based on the City Council's preference for the length of the quarterly newsletter. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Ot~A' Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION "E 15-01-04-4800 Finance DlreClor Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Police Department Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 Subject: Authorize Purchase of Motorola Radios for Police Department and Fire Department Agenda Number: PU 95-82 In the 1995/96 approved budget Council allocated funds for the purchase of radios for the Police and Fire Departments. These radios are needed to continue the conversion to the 800 megahertz communications system. To be compatible with the existing equipment these radios need to be manufactured by Motorola. The cost of the radios will be as follows: Police Department $17,452 $10,434 $27,886 Fire Department Total ------ ------ "-- Recommendation: It is recommended City Council authorize the purchase of radios from Motorola in the amount of $27,886. Finance Review ead Signature CITY COUNC.IL ACTION "EM 16-01-01-4460 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operatin udget X- Other FI.....ce Onclor Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ,~ Department: Finance / Support Services Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 Subject: Award Bid for Flatbed Trailers Agenda Number: PU 95-83 Formal bids were solicited for two flatbed trailers for the Utility Division of Public Works and the Parks Department. Thrs is the second formal bid for this equipment. We did not receive a response from the first bid request. The results are outlined below. C & S Trailer World $8,200 C & S Trailer World met all the specifications and general conditions of the bid and can deliver both trailers in thirty days. Fundina Source: Funds for the Parks Division trailer were appropriated in the approved 1995/96 budget and funds for the Utility Division trailer were encumbered from 1994/95 budget savings. 09-75-02-6600 $4,200 $4,000 02-11-01-6400 Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for two flatbed trailers to C & S Trailer World in the amount of $8,200. ""-- Finance Review ignature CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM See Above '. FIMnce Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Public Works Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 Subject: Award Bid for Repair of the College Hill!=: . Trinity Water Well Agenda Number: PU 95-84 Formal bids were solicited for the repair of the Trinity Well located on the College Hills Ground Storage Tank and Booster Pump Station site. Only one bid was received from Millican Well Service in the amount of $25,340. This contractor has done work for the City on numerous occasions. This repair will include the replacement of the motor and pump and the labor to pull the old equipment and install the new. In addition to installing the new equipment additional charges may be required for replacing electrical cable that will supply the power to the pump and the pipe that carries water from down in the well to the surface. There will be no way to know if cable or pipe needs to be replaced before the pump is pulled. The bid price for replacement of the cable is $11 per foot and the pipe is $9.75 per foot. The approximate depth for replacement of these items is 1,262 feet. Staff does not anticipate the replacement cost of the pipe and cable to exceed $27,187. These items shall only be replaced if deemed necessary and approved by the Director of Public Works. If the total cost of this well repair exceeds $52,527, Staff will bring it back to Council for your information. This water well is one of five water wells the City still owns and operates. This particular well can supply water at the rate of about 350 gallons per minute or 504,000 gallons a day. A very small amount of the overall water the City supplies each day comes from our five wells. Over 99% of the potable water comes from the City of Fort Worth and the Trinity River Authority. These wells are operated routinely to make sure they are in good working order for possible emergencies. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council award the bid for the repair of the motor and pump at the College Hills Trinity Water Well to Millican Well Service in the amount of $25,340 and authorize Staff to have the cable and pipe replaced as necessary in an anticipated amount not to exceed $27,187. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget L - 0 02-11-01-3110 FlnMce Director Page 1 of -~'-'"_.._~._._---..~".._-..._._._. ··-0 , . ,v /.. I j---.62'3:i 52/2 I 622' :I::L 5220 /' -' / ,.. I" I " ---."---.-.Ji. 1-..., >- -, i í'-H- 760J / / r k;; I ::: I / 6209 ji V -., ,j '-"-'/: p ,H'6 /;605~!6;-¡1 .. I .. /'-",- :/ '7: L W 7 : ¡ ... ¡ -L.: p" L' --1"1 _I /' "'-" /: ,ê; , 6206 I . " ms '-.", ~~ '- " -----'__, ! 18 .::\" - I I //'-""-""- :{/// ''-'''-''-,i u,,--}/ ,/1760/ 7809 17613 7617 "",,6201 """/'/" :'/--."- 62~J / '---""---"'---"/ "JYC~H " "/ (''''' / IJ ''''-. :/ '/ "-, ;'. U09 ~' ,--'.. OWEN DR. 5'19 .:(:$', ..\.:~ 6200 "-'.X, 6:> ,.j ~':"'1'/::Í:-':~,1:2"::"~:"~:~':'~""~8":,~~,.::=::: /' ~ ,"/ ", "":' " , 760' //'\V'·<,O"0-. / "-,," -rtn>, INITY ~O~ ':..-;-.,\),\ ·t' <'l'V.,~, ". " (~ , " :;¿;,'0~~ 6126 /":ì~¡,;!'~".. 8m "-, A' Ii ",," ~_~ W&Lr- ). IJ·'V" ß'~ ",..-v ", " ;;" " . '''", ;. . ''''-. , ./ I', ....../j.'0.. a' // 780' "v "'-.""'-. ,,/ >-..:.....<!', "':'" ,~",,!"i~:: ,/ 7603 6'2' 770' r ';: " ~'., ,/ ~,o."iÓ /,^."'-. / '<~>" /...~~-s-.y T '.=-,./ :\ .' "/ :' ,f'.. '··fo.y '.:ì '. '.'.' ,/ , " .' ........ " , . ... 'l ..1 \ \. C'¡., .: , _" , .. ' _ ~ ."./ ï', '\ n~)) I ''''-.,'''-. __ :..( 6"1~::<' ',:~.""'-., I "'-.!.,' -- -¡ "'-. . II // ' '--., , 760" \ ¡ I" ~ ""'-., ,)."609 "6'08' (. 18cl' '\., I I 'L "',,' 1~·::~_8.?~r;,dl_~_I~"~i____/8"Ci ',"H,.'~ _ ,N.C1-H-J,' I "'~'::íL-H ! 610' ~"-í, .'-- /: I'. :: I I ~ , 7721 ïH---_H, 7713 I 7717 i ~ I 6700 ¡ ¿ L.. I "J : ~'_"_Ht - , 601' I U::~'.::i-,··"::=::r::=::;':::··:l ; I : I ¡ 7720 ¡:, r,,-u-'T -'-,-,_ _ __ _ _ '_'.___ __ \ 77t~; I 77/6 I ;~ ;~,. L,~.l~l ,'- .1-.,._---L I' -- -"L..I - ~: ~..\'.~ \ ':lJ:: 101' ~ -. .\ 71'., \, 1711 .,., 2 S i::: ' ! =-: p 77' 3 . t : ~ :--"-"--:'"'T ~ . \ i . '- I 60/6 .,. r \, I "-u_,_,l. .z~~aL-·_-1--·· : i B006 : ......... '"' DR .,.....[-,_,_,+ ~ A V.fß:::-:ï··;:::.:::.¡.:.::::.::.:.':,::::::;·'· : I : y" I , 6006 I \ 7711 \ 7716 I 7720 ! ;,. Lu_u_,} 70B \ i I I : ! 600. ¡ ·-I,-_L., -1 · I ,.-J---' I I P I-- I Î\ 7709 i 7717 ¡ 7721:o¡ j U:'o~T . \ ;! I ~,,_.6::-CL.._..--:-,~ . ,-ftS:L..~~ '-:ë"" Y DR, "" '.., lfßf::::;:'f:':':':::: ~ ::.:.:.,.,.~.;.::::: .~:::.::::§: ." \ ' , . . U I - , 'I' I \ \ 17716 r 7724: 780'l,.S' 770. 770B i 7711 , I : ~ I \ (?ALLJXY 'COLLEGE ~ILLS' I \ ! ,_,J::lI~O--ª-ªb£D¡:2DJ:.¡!h"u~ ~..-...-. ~ ,. ." ( MATCH LINE - SEE CRID 2087-434 i \ .~~.. ('L \" "...... ':~. ''\'"'' ,,~,,~ ''<:I ' ~ü ~ .. ~: ~ ¡ '0 ~ ",..,: "" ~ ¡ ~ ~ I : 7B~' i c.ü . ~¡¡ I' S: to I j Qi¡' 0:::1: , -.. 'Ò ,-' \ ~.:' " '- ,,-¡ " 625f 60'9 S'09 .ü ~ ,-JO~ci_ 10"cI IS"di , , ,rat ;-..... 610!J 6011 .-..-..-..-..-..--.-. ~ 6000 .... ." B"pVC _,_' -' -.--; '-"600' .-..-..-..-..-..- 5957 3961 -' LOCAï1O~ 44-P \' 3949 - '.:,\. \ 11B4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance / Support Services Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 Subject: Reject Bid for 1995 I oadAr From AI~ ContinAntal and Award Bid to Future Equipment Company Agenda Number: PU 95-85 At the September 11, 1995 meeting Council awarded the bid for a 1995 Dresser Articulated loader to AIS Continental in the amount of $76,990 (PU 95-52). This equipment will be used by the Public Works Department. The bid submitted by AIS showed compliance with all requirements of the specifications and general conditions. The loader was delivered to the Equipment Services shop three weeks ago and it was discovered the loader did not meet the minimum specifications in several areas. When contacted by Staff, AIS stated they would fix all problems and make the equipment meet the specifications. AIS Continental can not make the loader meet our specifications and this equipment can not meet the needs of the Public Works Department. The next low bidder, Future Equipment, submitted a bid of $78,845 for a Case 621 B loader. When contacted, Future Equipment stated they would hold the same bid price if awarded the bid at this time. The equipment offered by Future meets all the specifications and general conditions of the bid. The Public Works Department is required to lease equipment until this situation is resolved. Recommendation: It is recommended City Council reject the bid submitted by AIS Continental and authorize Staff to return the equipment and award the bid for a 1995 Case articulated loader to Future Equipment Company in the amount of $78,845. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget -X- Other _ £C~ Department H d Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 06-01-03-6600 Flnllllce DIreC10t . ¡ Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Ratify Agreement with Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. for Signalization Improvements for Holiday t ane at Agenda Number: Mid-Cities Boulevard 12/11/95 Subject: PW 95-714: The section of Holiday Lane from Bogart Drive to Mid-Cities Boulevard was completed in November. There is already a large amount of traffic using this section of Holiday Lane. Traffic counts conducted by the City indicate a traffic signal at the intersection of Holiday Lane and Mid- Cities Boulevard is warranted. The engineering firm of Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. was selected to provide the traffic engineering services. They have agreed to provide these services for a cost not to exceed $9,200. The estimated construction cost is $85,000. Funding Source: Sufficient funds are budgeted in the 1996 Bond Sale for this project (engineering - $15,000; construction $85,000). This project will be included in the 1995/96 CIP Budget when the budget is amended. '-- Recommendation: Staff recommends Council ratify the agreement with Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $9,200 and approve including this project in the 1995/96 CIP Budget when amended. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operatin Budget_ Othe Finance Review Acct. Number 20-24-03-6000 Sufficient Funds Availa Finance Director ature CnYCOUNC~ACnON"EM Page 1 of BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 2630 West Freeway, SUite 132 . Fort Worth, Texas 76102 USA· (817) 877 -5803 . Fax (817) 877-3214 November 22, 1995 Jimmy Cates Public Works Superintendent City of North Richland Hills PO Box 820609 North Richland Hills, TX 76182-0609 RE: Traffic Engineering Services Watauga Road at Holiday Lane in North Rich/and Hills Dear Jimmy: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to provide traffic engineering services in connection with design of signal improvements at the intersection of Watauga Road and Holiday Lane. It reftects our understanding of the project needs, and it reftects our experience with such projects by incorporating aspects that are normally necessary. If accepted, this letter will become an agreement between the City of North Richland Hills (CITY) and Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. (BA) to provide the scope of services outlined below: SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1 - Design of Signal Installation 1.1 Gather and review roadway plans (available from CITY). 1.2 Obtain base map drawing data from CITY. 1.3 Conduct field observations as necessary to supplement other data including any design survey work necessary. 1.4 Evaluate anticipated traffic conditions and signal operating requirements. 1.5 Prepare preliminary signal design layout sheet to include existing roadways and critical utilities, proposed pole locations, controller location, conduit runs (if needed), signal head placement and configuration, power source, detector locations (as required), phasing, and other design features like signing. 1.6 Review preliminary design with CITY; incorporate input. 1.7 Identify applicable standards and specifications; modify or supplement as necessary. 1.8 Prepare list of materials and general notes. 1.9 Prepare detailed cost estimate. 1.10 Prepare final plans and specifications for letting. 1.11 Prepare bid advertisement and notify local contractors. Task 2 - Signal Construction Engineering 2.1 Prepare necessary copies of letting documents (i.e. bluelines and specification books) for distribution from BA office. 2.2 Distribute bluelines and specification books. 2.3 Attend bid opening at CITY facility. 2.4 Tabulate and review bids; recommend award. 2.5 Provide additional plan sets as needed by the CITY and the contractor (up to five). 2.6 Prepare tabulation of selected contractor's estimate. \ 2.7 Provide construction inspection or field engineering assistance as needed and requested by CITY. 2.8 Provide signal design modifications if necessary. [~ ) PARSONS · TRANSPORTATION GROUP Jimmy Cates November 22, 1995 Page 2 DELlVERABLES Task 1 Reproducible preliminary signal layout (one copy); Reproducible set of final plans (22" x 34") (one copy) and blueline copies as needed for distribution to bidders; Signal related specifications (one unbound copy); and bound copies as needed for distribution to bidders; Detailed estimate (one copy); and Bid advertisement. Task 2 Bid tabulation with award recommendation; Tabulation of contractor's estimate for invoicing; Additional plan sets required by the CITY or contractor (up to five); Documentation of actions taken as requested to provide construction engineering assistance; and Reproducible copies of design modifications as needed. RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CITY CITY will provide the following: Task 1 Available traffic signal warrant counts; and Proposed base map information 0.e., paving plans or digitized CAD file, if available); Any available reproducible standard details, specifications, and general notes from CITY; and Bid opening. Task 2 Basic construction inspection. Construction contract administration. MEETINGS For purposes of our agreement, up to three (3) meetings are anticipated as part of the scope for Task 1. FEE FOR SERVICES AND METHOD OF PAYMENT SA will be compensated for services under Task 1 on a lump sum basis as follows: Task 1 - $6,100 The lump sum amount tasks will include costs for all services rendered under Task 1 of this AGREEMENT by BA. The amount of each monthly invoice will be determined by multiplying BA's estimated percentage of work completed by the total lump sum amount less previously billed. Jimmy Cates November 22, 1995 Page 3 The fee for work under Task 2 will be billed separately based on our hourly staff rates times our multiplier of 3.1. Direct reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses such as mileage, reproduction, computer, etc., will be billed at cost and will be added to the staff time costs incurred. Our estimate for Task 2 is $3,100. We will not exceed this amount without receiving your prior written authorization. The fee for additional services, meetings, work sessions, and presentations will be billed based on our hourly staff rates times our multiplier of 3.1. Direct reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses such as mileage, reproduction, computer, etc., will be billed at cost and will be added to the staff time costs incurred with the additional services. Billings are due and payable within thirty (30) days of invoice date. A one (1.0) percent carrying charge will be added each month to all past due accounts. If payments are not made in accordance with the provisions of the AGREEMENT, BA may give written notice five (5) days in advance that we Intend to stop work, without penalty, until such payments are received. Following receipt of such payments and prior to reinitiating work, the CITY and BA will mutually agree on the schedule and costs for completing the terms of this AGREEMENT. AUTHORIZATION We are prepared to initiate work on this project upon receipt of a signed copy of this Letter of Agreement. This proposal will be valid for thirty (30) days. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY: 1s¡9naruvl ~M C. at ~h-ßord (Typed) (Ortis) Cì~ TrJanOljfr qÁ1J~ Robert W. Jenkins, P.E. Principal Associate Joi?~ Senior Associate RWJ:smd AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS FOR: C;~d IJfln,1)¡ChIard ¡j;¡¡0 (Organizati ) . //-~g -9!1 (Date) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Ratify Right-of-Way Acquisitions for Rufe Snow Drive Reconstruction - Onyx nr North to ~IAnviAw nr Agenda Number: 12/11/95 PW 95-75 Subject: Staff has acquired right-of-way from 18 properties for the Rufe Snow Drive Reconstruction project from Onyx Drive North to Glenview Drive. The additional right-of-way is needed to allow the sidewalks to be installed along both sides. Compensation for 2 of these properties was over $5,000 each (Parcels 5 and 6) and were previously approved by Council (PU 95-68 and 95-69). The remaining parcels were purchased for less than $5,000 and at the direction of the City Manager and Attorney for the City, payments were made for these parcels after each property owner signed the right-of-way deed. A summary of these payments is shown on the attached "Exhibit A". The total amount paid for right-of-way acquisition was $50,735. This amount includes cost of appraisals and acquisition negotiations by consultants. Funding Source: ,,--. Funds of $34,800 for right-of-way were approved by Council on May 8, 1995, PW 95-23. The additional $16,000 needed to cover the total right-of-way costs incurred can be appropriated from the Unspecified Street Fund Balance. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council ratify the right-of-way acquisitions as outlined in Exhibit "A" (attached) and the allocation of funds as detailed above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Oth Flnence DW.clot Page 1 of EXHIBIT "A" ;êLNrl .-.--.." ."--_..._-,,. ,---"............ ....... ".-..,. .-...,.",,_..-.-- .'. ......".....----...-".... .......-.... ..._-..,-.. ..._d._____,,__ .."".........___...__.. ..._d....... ___..""......._._......... PrOpêrty()wr"lê"'y . ··ApþráisédVälüe ArTI()unfPåîd·· 1 Freeman $ 370.00 $ 370.00 2 Flory and Gray $2,050.00 $2,050.00 3 Snow and Ang Ii n $2,180.00 $2,180.00 4 Allgood $1,190.00 $1,190.00 8 Leffingwell $ 550.00 $ 550.00 9 Brown $ 300.00 $ 300.00 10 Union of Operating $ 250.00 $ 250.00 Engineers 12 LaCroix $ 810.00 $1,560.00 * 13 Moore $ 700.00 Dedicated 14 North Hills Realty $1,710.00 Dedicated 15 Keystone Body Shop $1,780.00 Dedicated 16 Industrial Saw and $ 460.00 $ 460.00 Grinding 17 Birdwell $ 560.00 $ 1,060.00 ** 18 Pratt $ 560.00 $ 560.00 19 Adcock $3,230.00 $3,230.00 20 Sider $ 290.00 $ 290.00 * $750.00 was paid for landscaping and $810.00 was paid for land value only. ** $500.00 was paid as an administrative settlement for a water line encroachment onto the property. Parcels 7 and 11 are City owned property; no right-of-way was needed. idC4-T/tJ /'1/r r \;! ?;;-. ~ \ \ t ¥ 1:' i ,,~ Ii :J . , , ¡- i· ! ··1 'f::::1 , . ~ ! ...\, 1 \ t \ J \:1 I; \:: II ., :) 'jl.; ~" ~l"i 1.!.oI·; i ~"al~ ¡,W ~: !" Z'!I~ \ U.; z> I .. I " 1 '~ ~-~ -:. -- -- --- -- ", " " " ," [l, 2 ~~::: , ~~~~j~" .- ': [Œ1 ~~ J ,t" ¡tRtJ"" l , ' . 1 ~~: ... (!J) 1'108 001'1 I .. I . 11 ..""" ,.." ." ~> ,,1 "~ ' P\\ ~ ",,.¡W . ' . ~ ,;'; ~: ~ .;-t:::t "'" '1\." <f\\, ~ "J.',","" = ' '- k' ,-' h. ~ II IUI 'WI , :'. ,-"" ' ~!, ~'--. r "cc.,· : (:.:. ':::. __:~: ;~..: I~'. L~ ~ g ..,~ 'ÃS~~~iOY6 I"" " - .. ~, :: U"U :: I ¡" ;'~~ ---+-~-- '" ,'I:;¡ :~" I' I I . " II'''' I . . , I ~ ~ ~ = ' ' ~I ' .., " I ~-L'· 1.",J k;;-r"T"\ll-l- ,'}#"'o: '-J~" _ ~ 3 _ 1 . . ~.. -,---""'!:S L " ~ ~,' '.:ill'. ii&h--¡': . \_+ ,~' r ¡' ~ ," ,~-".... -,-.. .." "'., -+&: /:¡Ó. ~ : ' .f ~"":J: t.- .. i ,. '. V'"" I -=-= ~..' .. ., ;, r;j'1 :C, f ; jÏ'E -H : I' ,~ ..., ~.. I -" I ". ~ '7 I ... ..- ~ ~ç" I .~ 0,[£;1"" I ., I ,. ~ I ¡.;:;- jd f';:<' '~?J-. ¡:;;.,.;.. r. ,-'" " . u '1- - - - - -L.. ,,- -.-! ;;" ' 'l ~ ,. f.~ ~H I i'-;;- ¡ ~...:....L" ,~- .,' "1-' L· ": - ~ I T I' I~"'I\ 'T?I ~í,~~í :. 'Off,,: I Jþ.c~~I·-Ç"'·· :L; ~- I" :::' ' " '(," . -.. .' ~ 3 i'" ii" ~ -' -' ~~'" rl T.... 1 . . ;:, ;:, ;:, 3 ~ I Z .. ,,\ ,. I "I' I - ~ ,. E ~ .~ I~,I . _ ..' ....~/. _ . /.,' ..." ~L.. "I I ...:..... LJ<~"~ '" '.., I' i ' 3. I. II..[ 1/1" ~ ."" :.: \ TØ'- ^ _ "I"I.'I"I~.t'.rfol" ,~,I __,..-;T' I ~ I'! I -" C .1,1" ~ ,,'1.'/ .- ~IL'II~-~ T I r¡! ~ I II 1-' r...r l.'i -- "... ,,- =-,: ~.. I .. b ~1<~1 :.L ~ : r=G ~ :'1,:...1;, ;:. ¡;, ;.~ " '" Ø9 µJI ""'" T.,.. I - - -- " U:-1¡4e:~8i{ 1 I 1.:1 ,.~ ::!. i I:,' \ .., .\. ;", .( .... = " ~ ,00 >",W~I''''':< \ \ -;"' i -,' ,I !I,r.. " ."" " ~,. ~, ... \ 2 ,.... Gc¡~ >-----". ' .''1'' - , ... I \ þ.N 1 I .. ""1'''1''\ 11"'~ü_ --!.- I I I ~, . ~ I - . / ....,. ~~I . I,,:r:, ,'" --- .. "IIJ, ,,;...i \' II \ 11 ~ I T..... --~;ff--2 r- II ~O'TTO'~'O"~ 1 . _ "".. .. " " It" / / \ \ I \ . I . ... 5 .1 /," ~ ) o.n'OO. ..//"""....I,\.'.j~\,f' ,... ,:" ~ ...,~IV~"" " , i, !._ .-' I U ....,f'" ¡ .;'.':1' ~ ~ .' '. ,," "II-I, ,\,1,\. . \,~' \', ~ (Ø)" 'ß "" 7/. I I'''''' / . ,." ."." 'L"" .."..',+.." ':¡:T' ' u--·L ,A' " · ',' ,,". ' F,r ,-" " " "I' ' ' ' , · " ¡ ." _" f," ¡þ; "I" ..1-· ·k'·' .1. . ~ I i;g/~>:-:i:-:- ", ,,/.' _ ,;' /.." ~'!"I"" "I-I" -I- -I" +H ' 2~ ::~::,'. " · ' :: .< 1/" ,,1..1.. ..1..¡,:j'.rl'¡'¡'I,I.\.¡l ¡,::(i~"/· ' , ,-1,! ,,7 ..I" .. þ.:,''''-.. \01 \1 ,. " tJ.)644: IV - .. .. It ~ ~f$ " " ~ ÇS' ~ .~ - .\. -\- Vì 3. "0 ~ J !H~ 'J Gr--;- 1 L3 t. ~ ; I' ; " I' ~ "1" . F--~ r-¡f :-- !L~~~/.. . r-~~ I" :~I\ __L_~_ ~~~".' iI'i- !"", I' ~ -. ~l=- ~ .... H~~: !~~3+-' j I I: I !; + ~:i~: ,~~ ~ ,. i~;~ I ,J :.1 ¡: t·, _ ~t , '" ~ .~tt, n. ~I: I 9 !!~;" . ha· " , . ."=¡:¡- ð~ : ~1 ¡¡ '";.j' - - - --..- - -;- ~~: · I} ; ." 4 I ! I ¡.~. i·t_:i .1:: l'li hW--o. -'Õ~_---b.~!~. !~I ~ ~H~3 2 ~II '" h ;5 J "--.. .' :I¡«I i:' R :,1 \!I:lt I ~ - .t I, '..n-: - - - - - -.- ! h! i! ~ 3 - I i \ :- ¡ - el:: I':: Id;"~""-~:~' tfr-i ~~ ;,I~ Q),¡~ aJI.~ 9 ~ ~~. !~~ oj:! j! ih~: -"-;'-¡5~-9i1 f:"} 3 :1 j:~ I ill, 3 : ~tj ~ II å= ~!¡1,' ~!H H 9 ~¡~ í ~. I' it, -~t ' 1" '""I' . -4 -- --..- - -.- !!'<" 'h! ¡ .$t. _.;;__u - ·;i~ !!i'f~ . I If-(!) :J l 'Ii .l ", .~~- H :i' ~I ~~ ' d:¡ Iii el:; IIi ~i : ~!t" ¡ - I I, 3t- 11; 2 ,:1' <D:I' ,:1. i!):¡": 9 âH3 í/ I I ¡ ~;~ .l:~ -il! I! 'h! i I 'J 11~ 3:1 1J i· ., ;<. I " " .' L ' ----;---"..,.-__ I ;;) t4 !' d:: Iii " 'k- -' ¡: ã·~~ rl, 0)'1' i / s: :~ ,>..&~-;--- ¡t· ·~i~ ·j:1 j! ~=",' ~!~ 11' . -'_ ~ 9 ~i3 I"" ;4 !~~ ;/ <:~ I. I =-; -·-....-z-/Ii $ d:¡ in ~r " !4 Hi ~ 9 5=5 I I¡!¡ CÐ¡I¡ â / e!¡i ¡¡: d !!- ~ - ;- -.- - ~!~~ j= , ,¡. ~:I; ì~ I I, j ~ ~ ...-z--~¡¡~ §'~~ .I:~ 1'1: , _ u! i ! - 'J'---¥"'"' 9 I¡ ~ ;¡~~~ ~Il h ? I' , I I F-~-'-- /V:4 ,:,,0):1' ~ !I I, I ~ _ =i. /" ~I! -..I ¡ ¿ , H ! II t_ .:~' l 'I- I ¡II ~~:!I ! !!~il' ;1 dj! I,: , ' L¡"' . Hf 11-, III y'~ ¡" /1 Q) II ___ ':~~~~~~~~~"' \t:~~:~~~ 14t~~~J -- ..II ~~~". .=' -.r I·: :1: 'Il--L :r.-if!1 I r;=-J=----=::~l.~.- ~t .t~ ' €I:'! jU ..!< il - ! I;~ , - "5~ !~~ IlL hi: <»:1'1 ~fl I í I ~11r-4> 9 !~:¡ S~i~ i . ~ 'II; I. I I' ~:" I ; ~ -- '\ f!-~-k-! --~~-: }~I/ I r---~:u~ 2~ ~tel:' II' I I Ii fir' ~ 3i· ' : 1;~ ,:1: ~:n ;1 f M I I ': II~ ~ H3 I ãn~~ ~i~ -'II lu i-!I i~":jl 'I ~ Ii I ;¡'!I~ g~ 1! II --'~____'± " 1 !¡ 2 ~ .i Ii II . el,' ~f----:-. II I e:¡ II¡ -It Ii;. ..JI¡I ~ I;: _ ,U;. .g§t. f:l. @:I, §t..~ Jh~ ¡ i IIII a; ,J-W : ~1_~ §~.:,~ -h! h! ~H~ k~ I I':' ~~ ' Ht: ·i!i~ 9, 4 "i ......H' - I i 4 . @-!jl.' ___u-. -. - - --'="u"::!i!' II .: e-li:1) ª~J , ~t. . iT· 'I' . ·3t. :i~ H; : 'r-4> 3 :;=~ (" 1"1 'I ,.~ _', 4 _~' J: ___~~--;- ;- r·· " -r ::t. ,It. I, ~ =~~ § h~ : : ,..~ ' '<....!u~ ·w 9J i:~ ~ j jl u - u --;- =Š!~ ~_ . Ir ¡ 4 - -- I -;,':":'4 ~.,:: 1...'10 ~ ~~~ t' i ~~ I'r : . ~ ------- .---" 1',::...~'I'·:'>¡r:: :t.:': ...:;1' ,,:;~'; ~ "I' ã oj <. -... ~ - l- eI:; II; f:I, ~:I: -il! if! ~ = _~Ii. §"'s .¡~ ;¡:!i~ ~ 4 I·l fl, e'i I: f:I, <»:1; ,,,! h! !~ ~!Š~ .=-: :~ , ~ H o ~ ~ j o ::I 53 ~g: "- ~a ¡g ~¡:¡ ~~ '" 0< >- òi~ ~ u ~¡s ~ æ æo ..L ;:: ~ is Ii: ¡¡: 0 :z: ~'i ~I ~ gHji ~ 5 I!:! " ..iiH ¡ I ~~ : ~¡ I I 1 ;; . . . ~ . ¡I § '7 ft- d:i u¡ ¡ :1, (1):, . i,! I j _I:: I'~ QJt¡! It ¡:" CD:, . 1,1 i j l 'Ii _I:. II' ~'I U ~,I, 0)'1' ,.' I 'il! I ! 'Ii II' ....II ~¡¡ 'I¡ II. '"' II ~:I' I; ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Approve Budget for Installation of Street Lights Subject: on Rodger Line Drive Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: 12/11/95 PW 95-76 The construction of Rodger Line Drive between Calloway Branch Channel and Booth-Calloway Road is scheduled to be complete by September 26. 1996. The project does not include providing street lights. TU Electric has submitted a cost estimate (Exhibit" A") to design and install the street lights for this section of roadway. The cost estimate includes three alternatives. Alternate 1 2 3 Funding Source: Descri tion Install street lights on wooden poles with overhead service along the property line (next to back fence) of Allen E. Samuels, Allen Young Buick. Inc. and Morton Schwartz. (See Exhibit "B".) Install street lights on steel poles with underground service along the property line (next to back fence) of Allen E. Samuels. Allen Young Buick, Inc. and Morton Schwartz. (See Exhibit "B".) Install street lights on steel poles alternating on both sides of the road. Funding for this project can be appropriated as shown: From: Unspecified Street Fund Balance To: Rodger Line Drive Street Lights (13-23-27 -6000) Recommendation: $16,400 $16,400 Cost $ 0.00 $ 1 0,680 $ 16,305 Staff recommends Council approve the budget of $16,400 for street light installation on Rodger Line Drive and appropriation of funds as indicated above. Finance Review ture Cny COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of Flnence DlreClor EXHIBIT . 'A" -- -- -- .. ..- - TlJELECTR/C November 28, 1995 Mike Curtis, P .E. City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 Dear Mike: The cost to provide street lights on Watauga Road and Rodger Line Road are shown below. Watauga Road 30' Galvanized Steel Anchor Base Standard with 200 Watt H.P.S. 45 @ $530/pole $23,850 Standard Foundation 45@ $240/pole $10,800 Trenching 6,450' @ $3.30/ft $21,285 Bores - 4 @ 50' ($2,315) = $9,480 1 @ 60' = 3,844 Pits - 5 @ $1,000 = 5,000 17.324 Total Cost $73.259 Roger Line Road Quote #1 Wood Poles with 200 Watt H.P.S. on north side of the road. ~ p,o, Box 970 Fort Worth, Texas 76101-0970 Quote #2 - Steel poles with underground service on north side of the road. 30' Galvanized Steel Anchor Base Standard with 200 Watt H.P.S. 6 @ $530/pole $3,120 Standard Foundation 6 @ $240/pole 1,440 Trenching 850' @ $3.30 2,805 Bores - 1 @ 50' = $2,315 Pits - 1 @ $1,000 = 1,000 3,315 1 - 200 Watt H.P.S. mounted on existing pole o Total Cost $10.680 Quote #3 - Steel poles with underground service alternating on both sides of the road. 30' Galvanized Steel Anchor Base Standard with 200 Watt H.P.S. 6 @ $530/pole $3,120 Standard Foundation 6 @ $240/pole 1,440 Trenching (north side of road) 850' @ $330/ft. 2,805 Bores - 2 @ 50' ($2,315 X 2) = 4,630 Pits - 2 @ $1,000 ($1,000 X 2) = 2,000 6,630 Trenching (South side of road) 700' @ $3.30/ft. 2, 310 1 - 200 Watt H.P.S. mounted on existing pole o Total Cost $16.305 These cost are good for ninety (90) days. Please contact me when decisions have been made and when you are ready for the jobs to be released. If you have questions, please call me at 882-6244. Sincerely, . ~~ Cherry Richardson EXHISIT . 'S" ---. -- ---- 2",- ~ <..oa> 0- >- ~ . S~¡r (f1 -' w ::Jco ::¡;,..... <CO> co tf}('.. .~ LJð;::r-;- ZCDÔ"- ::Jóur:: ~a:~~ ,~ ~I '":--\ \ .. --- ------ .,- , I , , , ""i~.." ",..,.>-«..... - _.-!.-l. ------ u ~ :i u 2 a> . -lOX o¡;;"" S-i OXe::: >-00 zCD;tg ::5c!...:;ë <0.....'" -~~ c::< <.... . ;tz~ IO ... U::¡; '0 CII~¡;~ ðuã, ""o;t~ c::o _ 0,.,...:", ::¡;"'...'" ~ , , , ! t " . 0 - 'i w '" ~ (f) ..J < ::! ä: :: 0 0 q:i w z - . > -< ;¡; ::: U i . c:: z· 0 g w: , ¡ w ~ ê ¡ z :J '" ~¡ :.- !ž i c:: Õ :..:3 w z - ü 0 0 c:: I - _::: ~'. ; . ~ - <> " ;~IFr· -r; \. I~ ~:J /~ ~f_~r' :J;\\\ ".;c:.. ':.J .. ¥."~' ~i ~~::-: ~ :~z.tI ,..... " co ,.., w " < .... z o c:: ... '(.;1 < ?S ;¡ < "-aX oc:::1- :::: >- vi 0<-, -;t-' <ox ~ -' ~~~ :::::u< Õ:I:J:!- u""u""" -'0ê2~ ~g:I: I ~_J-~ CIIOC::_ 0...0", =-q-z,.... \ \ \ \ \ ¡Î 'J:. .:..:~ '. f.: ==~ '_...... ; i ;"', ; ~ : w " < .... ~ z ~ 0 c:: ð ... ... ~ J I ~ 1 . ! II) ~ n: !1 & r- ~ U1 \JJ /"'"'\ 0: z: r') ~ 3 0 ::t: uJ Õ V) f- ., ~ <.. ... .¿ ~ (t Õ. IJJ 0 ~ ,.. .5 <=r. '-../ i '< a / //Ý / '/ / ./ .,r-<) ,/ .::~, '/ ,..-:/ -- ......1&..1.:."...... . & ¡.f~~.:'''; -, , .~ I ),"~' : '-('''''--;:!'_~, I --=.;¡ -::¡--- ~J......:l...:-; CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Approve Budget for the Installation of Street Lights Subject: nn Mirl-Ci1ie~ 80lllevard Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: 12/11/95 PW 95-77 The construction of Mid-Cities Boulevard (Watauga Road) between Davis Boulevard and Precinct Line Road is scheduled to be completed by January 1, 1996. The project does not include providing street lights. TU Electric has submitted a cost estimate to design and install street lights for this section of roadway (Exhibit "An). The estimated cost is $73,259. Funding Source: There are sufficient funds available in the Watauga Road Utility Adjustment Project (02-89-04- 6000) to cover the cost of the street lights. Representatives with the Texas Department of Transportation do not anticipate any additional funds being needed from the City per the State Minute Order. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve the budget for street light installation on this section of Mid- Cities Boulevard. Finance Review FI...,.. C¡'.clot Page 1 of ~~ ~-- - , EXHIBIT . 'A" -- -- -- ... .. - nJELECTRIC November 28,1995 Mike Curtis, P .E. City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 Dear Mike: The cost to provide street lights on Watauga Road and Rodger Line Road are shown below. Watauga Road 30' Galvanized Steel Anchor Base Standard with 200 Watt H.P.S. 45 @ $530/pole $23,850 Standard Foundation 45@ $240/pole $10,800 Trenching 6,450' @ $3.30/ft $21,285 Bores - 4 @ 50' ($2,315) = $9,480 1 @ 60' = 3,844 Pits - 5 @ $1,000 = 5,000 17.324 Total Cost $73.259 Roger Line Road Quote #1 Wood Poles with 200 Watt H.P.S. on north side of the load. ~ P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth. Texa~ 76101·0970 Quote #2 - Steel poles with underground service on norÒ side of the road. 30' Galvanized Steel Anchor Base Standard with 200 Watt H.P.S. 6 @ $530/pole $3,120 Standard Foundation 6 @ $240lpole 1,440 Trenching 850' @ $3.30 2,805 Bores - 1 @ 50' = $2,315 Pits - 1 @ $1,000 = 1,000 3,315 1 - 200 Watt H.P.S. mounted on existing pole o Total Cost $10.680 Quote #3 - Steel poles with underground service altemat.ng on both sides of the road. 30' Galvanized Steel Anchor Base Standard with 200 Watt H.P.S. 6 @ $5301[ Jle $3,120 Standard Foundation 6 @ $240/¡>Jle \ 1,440 Trenching (north side of road) 850' @ $3.301ft. 2,805 Bores - 2 @ 50' ($2,315 X 2) = 4,630 Pits - 2 @ $1,000 ($1,000 X 2) = 2,000 6,630 Trenching (South side of road) 700' @ $3.30/ft. 2,310 1 - 200 Watt H.P.S. mounted on existing pole o T ota! Cost $16.305 These cost are good for ninety (90) days. Please contact me when decisions have been made and when you are ready for the jobs to be released. If you have questions, please call me at 882-6244. Sincerely, ~~.~~ --J Cherry Richardson CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS " Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 12/11/95 PW 95-78 Subject: Approve 1995/96 City Street Overlay Program Agenda Number: Staff proposes during the 1995/96 program the City overlay 16 streets shown on the attached list with a 2-inch asphalt overlay. The streets have been selected by eliminating the streets to be reconstructed in the bond program or have no curb and gutter. Then the streets are prioritized by their "condition rating." The streets were then personally reviewed in the field by the Public Works Director and Street Superintendent. The CIP Chairman, Lyle Welch, has also reviewed the proposed streets in the field with the City Manager and concurs with the proposal. The estimated cost for the subgrade repairs, partial curb & gutter replacement, asphalt milling, and 2-inch asphalt overlay is $377,560. Funding Source: Sufficient funds for this project are available in the Street Maintenance Fund (22-60-01-4890). Recommendation: Staff and the CIP Committee recommend Council approve the 1995/96 Street Overlay Program. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds AYei a Fin..."" Direct.. Ignat re CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Paqe 1 of - - - - - - If 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '"~ 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ui l(1 11 '" 0 (D "" N N N lO N '" r- m 11 ,~ CO L[) <D r- M. M "'- en 11 ~ 0- ",,- N- en" O- N (D" 0" M M- Il r3 ~ 11 S ;; M lO <D en N l(1 r- 0 ",- II ¡::: Õ <A> ... ... ... ~ N ~ If :; f- ... ... ... ... (¡j 11 U 11 U .c 11 <{ a 11 Ü 11 0 If 11 - - - - - If 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 N 11 "0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ui 11 11 r3 '" ëñ 0 (D co '" 0 0 V <D <D en ~ co r- 0 "" to_ lO- a r- r- L[) 11 Õ a 0" r"'; co- <D- v" M- M- en- 11 ,S u N N 11 f- N N ... ~ N N N If ëñ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 11 W 11 11 11 11 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II ~ X 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 N II ëñ .., L[) >- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cD II II a '" ¡ü M (f) 0 to co co 0 0 en to to to II U "0 C. X 0 M co M r- to to co co N II ra '" >- 0 to- M- to- M- ,,¡ ",- ",- r"'; r"'; r-- II r3 0, a:: (f) N <A> ;; ~ ... ~ ... ;; II Õ .c CJ ... ... ... ... II f- :J Õ ;; II (f) U f- 11 11 II II 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 II U >- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II <{ >- (f) 0 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 11 (t Ô 0 0 0 0 0 l(1 0 0 M II :2: ~ L()_ en 1'-" r- 0 0_ '" en en M :::: II :r: > 0 v en" ~ "," en- en l(1" en" en- ",- II 0 M ... ... ;; ... ... ... ... ... ... ;; (! II Ñ ... CIJ ëñ II OJ II II (! ~ II c::: .êtj U - - - .... " 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 >- II 0 0 0 0 1/') 1/') 11"1 .c II 111 11"1_ co ,.... C!) to to 1/') co '" -. " ~ v" co" en" "," 1/')- r-" 0" v" co" !!2 tJ) CD " ~ ã) " ïã '" N '" - 0'1 " "3 Õ CIJ -. " E f- .... l() " :J .;¡ ëñ 0'1 " u c::: 0'1 II U (! ë T"" " <{ >- " -= CIJ II U E (! - - - a:: -¡:: t CIJ " 0 . 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 8 -= (! > " 0 i 0 0 8 8 1/') c. 0 " 11"1 C"1 en en en C"1 C"1 t II VI M M M M C"1 M v 0 CIJ " ïã "0 Z 0 U II Õ >- <x:: II f- CT tJ) 2 II (f) 0 ~ " ?¿ .... I " 0 II ~ " : ' U N - - - .S:! "C " ;;; ;;; ;;; ~ : ,.... ;;; ,.... M M M C"1 ¿ M :ë CIJ " ::è J:: x x x x x )( )( I 8 )( tJ) " '5 8 8 8 8 § § 0 § ::J 0 " ÕI 1/') ! a.. c. II C ~ 11"1 ~ M M to ~ 0 " 111 ~ ~ ~ " -' I .... " a.. " ! - - - " co M v 11"1 CD co co en en ;::. " 11"1 C!) CD CD CD CD CD C!) C!) " c " ,g CI II L(' .E " en 'C ïã en " ~ c a:: II 0 " U " " - - - - - " " " II " II II II II II II ð c " -' ... " > " ãi ~ ëñ <{ ~ a II 111 C 111 II èñ > w (f) Ü :; c " f- <{ > "0 0 E -' II W "0 2 '" C "0 § <{ '¡:: " C "C :; c:: -' " W 111 0 w ð -' ;;: 0 ¡; (¡j II c:: "C a a a:: >- "0 ð a:: J:: " f- ra W ~ (f) c z W ra a a:: w < (f) VI a " (f) '" ~ 111 W -' :5 <II Z ~ ~ f- -' > (t a:: .= f- :a " a a:: ã. a:: <II a :5 ïã -' ~ 2 õ w w " w -::: ra W ~ W ra -' ~ f- E w c:: " w a 0 :2: u Ìii w CJ ~ :r: .9 0 (f) c:: c <{ ..c :>:: è: :r: õ ð ~ " -' z :::. c:: ð è: a:: w f- a " ~ .£ u -' c:: :r: ã, <II " W 111 W (f) Z f- a -' z w ëñ :r: c (f) "C " 52 :; W 111 W ëñ CD Ìii a:: ëñ ra w >- 0- ra U ::;;¡ Z c " c a:: > w <II <{ C w .!!! CD "0 W "0 0- 111 Z :J " U 111 0 a:: 0 c:: :; :2: ãi 0 c a:: ra 0 Õ ~ u 4: E <{ 0 ð U >- J:: :J " -, a -. CJ U f- ::::ï CD CD -' CJ (f) f- Z C) :2: <{ " - - - - - " N M -i .,; cD ,..: a::i ai 0 " " 11 - - - - - " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " N N N N N c::J cq " ~ en ~ ~ ~ a 0 l!1 " OJ r- M 01 01 to', '" <D 01 " ,2: c::J ("')- 01 r- l!1 In 01 " iã ("')- ("')- N- 6 r-- " iã 0 .... " "S l!1 r- N "" r- .... r:r;¡' " E Õ N N ("') ("') ("') ("') M " :J ~ ~ ~ ~ "q. "q. "q. .... ã:; " u " u .c " « 0 " 13 " 0 " " - - - - - " 0 a a 0 0 0 0 " 0 a 0 0 0 t::! cq " a ci ci a a 1\ "tJ 0 0 1\ ro OJ u; 0 "<I" c::J a to <D iã ":t ":t a CD_ r- c:) In 1\ Õ 0 a" 01- r:r;¡' 6 a" 1\ ,E u Ñ .... " ~ l!1 N N M .... 1\ u; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M 1\ W .... 1\ " 1\ 1\ 1\ a 8 8 ° ° a 0 1\ X 0 0 0 ~ co 1\ u; <ð ~ l!1 >- ci ci ci ci a r- M 1\ 1\ 0 OJ iã ("') en a "<I" co a to t.:> "" 1\ U "tJ a. x 0 ":t <'1, M to c::J "', N, IU OJ >- 01- CD' N' 6 1\ ro C, c:c: 0 - r- 0 1\ en N N ;; ;; ;; N 1\ Õ .c C) .... ~ ~ N 1\ ~ :J Õ ~ .... " en U ~ 1\ 1\ 1\ " a a ° ° 8 ° 0 1\ U >- 0 0 0 0 CJ <=! 1\ « >- en ci ci ci ci ci "" .... 1\ IU 0 0 0 0 0 M T" " :2 ~ 0 0, r-_ 0 en c:) M 1\ 0 co' cr·; cr.- N- ....- ::: " :r: > M - - 2 " 0 N .... - ~ ~ on (J 1\ N .... .... .... .... T" CI) 1\ .... 0) 1\ ro ,~ " c: - - - ro U 1\ - cr. 0 "- 1\ èõ èõ èõ èõ 0 >. CD M 0 ~ 1\ <II N en co, co ":t m -- " .2: l!1- r-- ;" r:;¡" N- r.n r.n to " ¡¡¡ iã ~ M ã> " <'1 <'1 ":t I,(') "':. en '5 Õ 1: (J -- " E N L(') " ~ on 'C .::: en " :J CI) " u c: en 1\ u CtI ~ " « c: >. " .c: (J " u E ro - æ "- - - - t (J " ° I ° 8 8 ° c:) 0 ~ CtI > " ° i ° 0 r- <=! t 0 1\ a ,... en M N a. " CII ,... N M M M "" en 0 (J " ro "tJ ! M Z 0 U 1\ Õ >- ¡ ""- <{ " ~ 0- N r.n " en on 0 ~ :2 " I, ~o I " " uS N " - - - ,S! ï:J " en M M l!1 V <'1 M M :õ QJ " 1: J:::. X X X X X )( r.n " ÕI ~ ° 8 8 8 g 0 :J 0 " 0 ° a.. a. " c ~ v en M - - 0 1\ <II - - 1\ ...J "- " a.. " - - - 1\ ;: ;: M " ,... ,... ,... I"'- 1\ C " ,g 0> " 111 .£ 1\ en 'õ ¡¡¡ en 1\ c c:c: 1\ 0 1\ U " 1\ - - - - - - 1\ en 1\ -J 1\ « 1\ ~ 1\ 0 1\ ~ 1\ " " 0 " ~ 1\ " en c 1\ (jj W c on 1\ ~ « ~ " ~ C "tJ 0 co 1\ èñ w IU c:c: .... " ...J <II CII c èñ c; " U -, OJ C " « T" a c:c: =a ~ c ~ <II C 1\ ~ W > ...J -c " « -c U > w w c 0 <II ëõ w èñ ~ '" w ¿; OJ 1\ 0 > <II >. i¡j " c:c: ëõ a "tJ c:c: =a c:c: :::! c:: W 1\ ~ ~ =a ~ IU -c " CII 0 C c:c: a è5 CL a. a :;; 0 '" en en > c:c: :J 1\ 0 ]; ~ z ëõ =a 1\ IU ~ ~ <II >- a 1\ 0 a u « :; >- C ...J 0 > 0> " ~ :;:, ë:: 0 « ...J 0 a "tJ en ëõ .S 1\ en en 0 u; Z IU en i¡j J:::. 0 CII 1\ c:c: .c w 1: a c c:c: -c « 0 :;; c:c: 1\ « c:c: w J:::. « (jj õ c:: " 0 0 0 ~ '" :r: m u Z c:c: -, u ü: en u u a c " ~ - - - - - - - N M ~ u-i tå -c - C n CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Agenda Number: 12/11/95 PW 95-79 Department: Public Works Approve Professional Services Budget for Subject: Little Bear Creek Flood Study Council Meeting Date: A flood study will be required with the approval of the Little Bear Creek Corridor Ordinance on this Council Agenda. The engineering flood study will calculate the 1 OO-year frequency storm runoff from the watershed in a fully developed condition. It will then model existing conditions in Little Bear Creek and its tributaries and calculate the water surface elevations for this 100-year storm runoff within the City limits. The current Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood plain maps only reflect the flood plain for a runoff from a 1 OO-year frequency storm falling on the watershed in its existing developed condition. The Little Bear Creek Corridor will need to control all of the future fully developed 1 OO-year flood plain in order to avoid any flooding of residences in the future. The Little Bear Creek Council Committee and staff recommend Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. (KEF) be contracted with to provide this flood study. A proposal from KEF estimates the cost for the main channel flood study to be approximately $67,000. Several tributaries will need to be added to this proposal and we estimate the additional cost to be about $15,000. Additionally, some analysis and inventory of the environmentally significant areas within the flood plain will need to be done. This should only add $10,000 to $15,000 to the overall cost of this flood study. The overall budget therefore needs to be $100,000. Funding Source: Monies can be appropriated from the following funds. Total $ 30,000 70.000 $100.000 ~Unspecified Park Funds ~Drainage Utility Fee Fund Recommendation: The Little Bear Creek Council Committee and staff recommend Council authorize the City Manager to contract with Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. at a maximum fee of $100,000 for this flood study and approve the appropriation of funds as indicated above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Bud et _ Ot er. Acct. Number Sufficient Fun /..ø.- / 09-92-29-6000 FI.....ce Director Page 1 of {#IO . KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. ~~u CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas August 27, 1995 \:: " kUG 2. 8 \995 \ l : \ \ \ E==- i ,\ ',,' ','I '" 'I \ --1VJ Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-249, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, LITTLE BEAR CREEK FLOOD STUDY PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES As you instructed, we have prepared a Proposal for Engineering Services which includes preparation of maps showing the existing and ultimate 100-year water surface limits along Little Bear Creek within the North Richland Hills City limits as required to establish a greenbelt corridor and control future development within the flood plain area. The following exhibits are attached for reference: 1. Project Location Map -- Little Bear Creek Study Area 2. Detail of Study Area Limits 3. Proposed Cross-Section Locations 3.1 Plan-Profile Sheet L-1 3.2 Plan-Profile Sheet L-2 3.3 Plan-Profile Sheet L-3 3.4 Plan-Profile Sheet L-4 4. Work Task Costs and Schedule This assignment includes the following general scope of services with an estimate of Engineering Services Costs: 1. Field Surveys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 26,022 Determine property ownership within the Little Bear Creek flood plain area, and obtain permission from all property owners to enter property and develop field survey data required to calculate and delineate flood plain limits. Establish horizontal and vertical control based on the City's G.P.S. monumentation, and obtain channel cross-section data at the locations shown on Exhibits 3.1 - 3.4 (attached). Also, obtain the finished floor elevations of all homes and other structures located within the 100-year flood plain area along Little Bear Creek within the North Richland Hills City Limits. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021.817/283-6211. METRO 817/267-3367. FAX 817/354-4389 Page 2 August 27, 1995 Little Bear Creek Flood Study 2. Prepare Flood Maps Based on Existing Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15,355 Using current City topographic maps supplemented with field survey data, compute existing lOO-year water surface elevations using the "HEC-2" computer program with existing lOO-year F.LS. discharges, and plot flood plain limits and water surface profiles on lOO-scale work maps and 200 x 10 scale plan-profile sheets. Also plot cross-sections showing water surface elevations at each section. 3. Prepare Flood Maps Based on Ultimate Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . $ 17,557 Compute ultimate lOO-year discharges using "HEC-l" methodology, and calculate ultimate lOO-year water surface elevations using the "HEC-2" program, and plot flood plain limits, water surface profiles, and cross-sections based on these conditions. Assume future culvert or bridge improvements at all major street crossings based on the Drainage Master Plan recommendations. No other major channel improvements shall be assumed. 4. Prepare Hydraulic Report Suitable for Letter of Map Revision (L.O.M.R.) Submittal to FEMA for Approval of Existing Flood Plain Limits Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,754 This represents the additional work necessary to prepare the special forms and tables included in a L.O.M.R. report, along with the hydraulic calculations, flood plain maps and cross-sections developed in Sections 1 and 2 above. This study will provide a more detailed delineation of the existing Little Bear Flood Plain Limits than the Current FIS Flood Maps indicate. Also, this analysis will take into account clearing, grading, and other improvements which have been made to the Little Bear Creek channel which may not be included in the current FIS study. Preparation and submittal of this report to FEMA will be required to change the current flood plain limits on the official FIS Rate Maps. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR LITTLE BEAR CREEK FWOD STUDY ........... $ 66,688 Engineering services required to be performed for this assignment by Knowlton-English- Flowers, Inc., Consulting Engineers shall be as outlined in Section II, (D), of our "Agreement for Engineering Services" Contract dated June 13, 1977, and shall consist of furnishing digitized G.LS. data tape of updated flood plain maps, along with five (5) copies Page 3 August 27, 1995 Little Bear Creek Flood Study of the Flood Study Report, work maps and plan-profile sheets. Additional copies shall be furnished, upon request, for the cost of reproduction. Compensation to the engineer shall be on a reimbursable basis in accordance with Section VI, (D), of the Engineering Services Contract. Assuming Council approval of this assignment on September 11, 1995, we are prepared to begin work on September 18, 1995, and complete the assignment on January 30, 1996, (a period of 134 Calendar Days, or 91 Working Days as shown on the attached Schedule, Exhibit 4. Please call if you have any questions. ~w.~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E, Vice President ~ RW A/ral.uth.249 xc: Mr. C.A. Sanford, City Manager Mr. Randy Shiflet, Assistant City Manager Mr. Larry Cunningham, Assistant City Manager Mr. Mike Curtis, P.E., Capital Projects Coordinator LlrrL! S£AI< CI<€cJ<. SrupY AREA I i SCALE ,. . 3000' -......l._, ---- City Limit. IOldw.y ',U,oold Storm Dulin. Culvert. or .rld,,_ hrthe" Chl""el Concrete Ch,""el O..,I,nd SWlr. Let. Of Pond ................ Gì<HIBIT J -...-...--.--. - 100·Y." 'Iood Plain EXH /ß/T '2.- \ . . / _i ~ :t( t^ ~¡: ~' ~~ "":::)......... ¡.....--J V) '. / ~ § or , . § ~ w .. w ... ~ § W -' « .. C,) <fI I- ',Æ-: t '. ., - t\ !L- ". L~__-""""'---='-~~f"?-:'-~_~~~~~j::" ,-- -. ,," -.- -f'Œ-¥E-··---- .-~--,+-- . . ~~':::ij~?~;;~ m~~~~3: 2"~;-;::§$,~Oc:~~~ . :f'Ef :-f':.-:-..../ '""', r'-~-II' ,:;- ~~,-_., ' --------=:::'.......~' ~=::;~ .Q~-st:=;;:;:-t ~--" -...... ~ff .'~.' :::c~::: .E2=-......~~,~-~ ~_-.-------~.-.-~ ;fti,~[7 .ff7Jjf~;!R . fI) '- C1 C1 I: 01 I: WOo: < CIW 1:<tI '- ..... .... ~ .. ::I fI) C1 >-I:~ 00'- ::>Uu.. >- II) .C1 .~ ZU::I :ë='i ..... ..c: 0.. 'U fl)1I) §~ .....0 u..~ u.. ~, w..c: WfI) 00:'- U~ 01 00:1: <W W 0 11'\ <til:l> 00 W.... a. .....~ C1 >-JlII) >- 0 I -I:eo .....~~ æ <II C1 Z ~ CII .0.... CII·_ <II ~fI)O ::II: 'i 8. 1; ..c: fI) , U C1 <II (1)00:< <II <II >< CII >- fI) ~ ~ :r: 'E <II ~ ..c: U 00: ..c: .... '- o Z ... o >- .... U >- o ::> >- II) § ..... u.. 00: < W <tI W ..... >- >- - ..... fI) CII U I: CII 'E 8- CII o ... o 01'- 1:0.. ';:' CII '-.... <II <II >00: ZZZZZZZ >-CII eo.... 01"'1""0 0 -...., ....:t1l'\...:tONOO 3= ~~~cÖÒO~ ~ ""'NI"'I""'~""'CQ fI) CII .... o Z fI) CII .... <II U o fI) fI) < ~ '- ..>o/CII '- I: 00 :38. CllII) U C :; ...... co - 'too QI ¡¡; 'ü ãí ¡ 8. 0 b u,- U CII'- >- 'L:.É'L:.= g ~ ¡¡¡ CIIUIICI'-'-::E -GJ-CL.:J u>-uwo..lI)l"'I II U '- ::I :;: æ II <II Oo:Z fI) '- '- 0 II >- I: CII 0> ~~9~:18.5 ca~~2:a:::cncn 2! <II Z fI) CII .... <II e .- <II U CII 0>- I: fI) >- 0 fI)>- '-... <II < II 0"'-C1:1: > tÐ :30- CUo_oI L.. CIIO>~.o ::I L...,tU--L.cn UII)o«~-c . . . . . o~ ::0: ~ C! ~ ~ 8..~ ca.,.....:E"'cn~ .... '- 8. CII 00: CII U '- ::I o fI) CII eo: W Z ..... W ::E >- ~ ::I u.. II U '- ::I o <II CII eo: -C >-'- II 0 ~:3 CI) "- IV IV C >- Õ) o c :J UJ I- CI (J) ~ o ¡¡¡ o § .....10 rd () x d LL~.E m~~ W J: IV cr 'C ~ Üa¡- _ LI- OC£'fii i'5ã:'5 , € .¡j o I ~ Z § .....1_= 1-0:: I-~o :JO§ :>£ ¡¡¡ 1i5 II') 0 8 0 8 8 8 8 aJ ~ 0 r-. l, v 8 8 8 8 ¡g ¡g ~ ¡g (\ tD æ (') !£ !£ 8j ~ @ @ ~ tD V V ... r-. (\ (\ ... v r-. r..: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ @ d t'J t'J d ¡; ~ ~ (j (j (j (j æ æ (j ~ ¡¡j æ ¡B @ ~ ~ r..: Š ~ ~ ~ ~ æ 3 3 is lë v v v v 3 ~ æ û II') ... r-. ãj « ¡g æ" M' a) a) C\I ..: Ñ r-.' cd' M' M' r-.' C\I ..: .... .... õ !¿J, (') ~ ... (') ... ... ... ... (') (') II') II') tD V V ~ 'íñ' Iii ~ (') (\ II') v v (') ... (') æ d d ... d d d d d d !Ii d (\ (\ d d cd ¡¡j 'o.. (\ II') II') II') ~ ... ... v :s - 0 Q. !B !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ æ ~ æ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ ~ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ ~ ~ !£ C: :> 0. 0. 0. .!. ~ :> 0. 0. ~ ~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. :> :> 0. :> ~ :> :> b 0. b CJ c: CJ Ü CJ (t 0 CD CD CD ~ 0 CD CD (t CD CD CD CD CD CD CD 0 0 CD Q 0 0 0 CD CD Q Q CD -0 CD ~ ~ CIJ CIJ CIJ ~ ~ CIJ rJ? ~ 7 7 CIJ CIJ CIJ CIJ CIJ CIJ CIJ ~ ~ CIJ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ; 9 c: ro @ ~ æ rb N ~ tD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N r:. 'o.. ... v ... (') ... ... w 0 ... ... ... ... N (\ ... ... N ... !£ !£ ~ !£ !£ ~ ~ !£ !£ !£ !£ !B !B !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ ~ !£ !£ ~ ~ !£ !£ !£ !£ !£ 0. 0. 0- 0. 0. ü ü ~ 0. 0. 0. ~ ~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. :> 0. ü :> :> > > 0. 0. 0. .!. :> CJ CD CD CD CD CD ~ ~ CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD 0 CD ~ 0 0 0 0 CD CD CD Q 0 1ii CD CIJ rJ? rJ? rJ? ~ ~ CIJ CIJ CIJ 7 7 ~ CIJ CIJ ~ CIJ ~ CIJ CIJ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CIJ rJ? ~ ro rb rb ch ~ ~ tD ~ ~ ~ ~ æ ~ v û5 tD tD N N ... ... (\ (\ v ~ r-. 0 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... (\ CIJ '" :::!: CD CJ -, :s ~ '" ., ., <l. ~ ~ 0 Q¡ 0 g, 0 CIJ ., 0 :::!: CD c: >. >. >. a: 0 CD CD ~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <l. û) ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ « « ~ « ~ « CIJ « CIJ « ~ ~ ~ 0- :J :J :J :J CIJ CIJ CIJ CIJ :::!: CIJ :::!: CIJ CIJ CIJ CIJ CIJ CIJ CIJ :::!: :::!: :::!: :::!: :::!: :::!: -, :::!: -, :::!: :::!: :::!: :::!: :::!: :::!: CD ~ Z :>£ ., (t ~ ., e- ~ ., 0 ., ., ãj ãj ãj U ., "" ij ., L: ãj ð i .c ., 0 (t (t i -0 -0 -0 E 1:: ~ CD Õ CD ~ ., ., -0 0 0 0 0 < ~ c: 0 ~ ., ., 0 :::!: 0- !â '" -0 CD :J c: :::!: :::!: :::!: :::!: >. c: c: .:: CD ~ 0 i e a: :J ., CIJ 0- CD !J 0 0 ., ,,; a: L: -5 CD CD :J a: CD CD ., c: ~ 'fl c: ãj Iii cd ., 01 fir u -0 ... ~ ~ c: 0 :ë ~ c: CJ 0 -0 c: ., i CJ CD CD :::!: (t :t CD ë 0 0 õ CD ... ., ., ... :::!: c: j :5 CJ :e :e 0 ~ :J CD ¡;¡ 0 ii: ãj CD E i :::!: Õ (t ã. (t c: CJ CD CIJ a. rJ? rJ? :::!: ro ãj ãj CD -0 -0 0 CD ii: t: CD 0 ., ~ õ CD "" 0- a. :t::: c: > CD ès :t::: c: ...J ~ B g ., ., t)I à CD E :::!: )( Õ 0 U :J < ès c: E Q¡ w w 0 0 ., ., CD c: -0 ...J ãí CD iE c: -0 :J u. [jj 0 ~ ~ i , 0 -0 U U >. c: e e u -.: 0 ãj CIJ -0 e 0 CD CD CD CD J CD ~ CD 0 c: CD 0 U u: CD £;; ~ ¡¡; fir ro :5 L: 0- U ro CD 01 CD ~ ~ ¡¡; 0 U U 0 W ¡ u: !< L: ~ :::!: a. ., ~ 0 ... ü c: ro u I Õ CIJ ~ E 0 CD 0- ãj .9 W ., CD >. 0 E E -0 Õ :J c: £;; CD U (\ CD "D E :J CD E CD CJ E ã. t: (IJ CD ê 0- ro CD u: E C) ., CD ~ CD 0 ro 0 è ro > U ., CIJ 0- 2 ~ èa Iii :&¡ F w :J 0 0 Ì5 '" ãj 0 CD W :J 0 ~ E ~ 0 CJ c: ~ (t CIJ u: a: u: Õ 0 0 u ~ 0 I w 0 U :J -0 CD CD 0 0- :J U. :t ãj è: a. CIJ ...J CIJ u: :J ro CD t= ~ U I u: U 0 è: CD -0 0 U CIJ ~ 8 3 :9 ¡g ~ 8 3 :9 ¡g EJ ~ 8 3 ~ a a a q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ 8 ¡g ¡g ¡g ¡g ¡g ¡g 3 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 :9 ¡g ¡g ¡g ¡g a a a a a a a ~ 8 3 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 ð ð ð 15 "'- 0 d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d 91 ~ ~ CD c: o (¡) ~ ~ I ãj 2 CJ « ~ () () c: >- ÕI o c: ::> w r- C) (fJ :!§ o ¡¡¡ o c: og¡8 Li ~ c,) ....s m~~ w :E () c:'O~ üjG= C:-§]! ;'5æÕl €~ o c: . Z 0 ...J_'§ ~ ~ 0 ~o2 ~ o CO ëi5 e! (I'J f;'j t'I 'It l!iJ t'I l!iJ I'- I'- ce II) !9 i1i II) t'I t'I t'I t'I &1 f,1j 'It ,... 'It ,... t'I t'I ,... 'It 'It ,... ,... ,... ~ ~ ~ cd It1 (j ~ It1 (j ¡; ¡; t'J íEl ~ ª !IS ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ iR- I'- ~ iE ~ r» C5 C5 6' ce ~ ~ ~ I'- ,... ~ ,... ~ ã! « d' err ,.: err ~. Ilf ...: err t'f t'f ~ !:!! ~ ce Il) Il) ,... ,... ~ ,... Il) (I'J 10 Il) 10 10 , ~ ¡ fB «i ce (I'J M cd t'I (j d d ~ (I'J d d t'I d d d d (I'J t'I ,... ,... - ~ 0 g, !R ~ ~ ~ ~ !R !R !R !R !R !R ~ !R ~ ~ !R !R ~ ~ !R ~ ~ :> :> > b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ æ ~ æ æ ~ ~ c: æ ~ æ 0 0 0 CO CO U CO 7 + ~ ~ 9 7 7 ~ 7 7 ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ 7 7 7 ~ ~ ~ c: âí 'It ,... N t'I 'It 'It 'It ,... I'- I'- II) W 0 ,... ~ ,... ~ ~ ,... ,... ~ ,... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !R ~ ~ !R ~ ~ ~ ~ !R ~ ~ ~ æ !R !R ü ü ~ ~ 0 b ~ æ æ ~ æ æ æ æ ~ æ æ æ ~ ~ ~ Q Q co co i co + ~ 9 9 ~ 7 7 7 ~ ;£ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 7 ~ 7 ~ âí t'I t'I ~ 'It N 'It 'It 'It I'- I'- 8 tñ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II) ~ ~ ~ ~ CD 0 ~ ëð <{ ëð <( 0 en en II) co ::!: ::!: ::!: ::!: a: cñ cñ en cñ cñ en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ « ~ ~ « C) ~ ::!: ::!: ::!: ::!: ::!: ::!: en en > J J J J J J ::!: ::!: ::!: ::!: m CD ~ Z ~ II) ~ II) II) fi- B fi- B ::!: ~ ::!: ! u u E ~ 0 II) 0 II) 0 E 1:: 0 c: 0 c: u. II) 0 D ¡¡: 0 ¡¡: 0 e: 0 E i 0. ~ fJ :c II) :c 0 II) u. E CD CD CD u CD âí u II) ã! iI I 0 0 a: ã! CD CD ã! CD CD E 13 .. []I u. 0 a: u en en u õ) c: u. co ë u ~ u ~ 0 ð f! ëi. e: 0 u è en II) è en II) u. ~ ~ 1:: CD CD æ II) II) fi- 0 CD c: 'd a: II) 0.: e 0.: e e: CD ~ ~ ::J e 0.: 0 ~ u u ~ ::!: CD ~ U .. ~ 0.: u ~ u õ) ëiI :J Ü j m ã! 1:: D... fi- e: 1ii CD CD ãi ~ ~ 0 []I []I []I ~ CD CD ~ :J 0 c: II) 0. .; ::!: e: e: c: âí âí E CD Õ e: e: ~ 13 ~ CD []I e: 1: 1: ~ i: i: "Q E E E a: E ëiI ì:i ~ CD []I e E a: e: II) u u ~ ~ ~ E E E fi- 0 e: :r ~ ~ 1: D... 52 0 en ë t! 0 0 ::J ::J ::J U w a: a: u m 1: CD ¡¡: ::!: D... ::!: CD u 0 u 5 ~ 8 ~ en ~ 8 ~ :g !9 ~ 8 C5 :g !9 ~ B B B B ~ 5 5 !9 ¡g ¡g ¡g ¡g ¡g ¡g ~ B ,..:: B B B B ,..:: B B B B !9 ~ 0 0 cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS cS ~ ¡d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d ... <ill co c: o to Æ ~ I ã! ;3 u « ~ (J CIS (j) ~ ~ o ûj ~ :E -æ ::J ..... (.) « >- CI ... 0 C,) C,) :J c: ~ õ en c: w 0 CI c: 0 E 0 ::J CI c: ...J 0 LL CI 0 CIS ~ )( 0 C,) W l- £: W J4 ~ rc J: C,) 0 "0 :: 0 rc ái ~ U) :E .r: (J .!!! ã: Õ II) € c: 4J J 0 c: ...J Z 0 ~ õ ~ ~ ...J Õ 2 ... ~ 11 : u.. ~ - ......---------- ------------ ------------ ---- --- ,--- - -- -oo --- Ø) .J: .... I Ii -, : : - &! c - - ....._""-----... - - - ......... ... - -- --- i!i tl-_-.. : . 1(') z i ~ ~;¡ .... - - ---...-----.. ........ ... - -- -"r-- u_ 1$ . 0 f-- --r" I ---~_u-~i -¡r ---i"---~- +--- -I- oo- -oo i- .1 ¡ .1 ~ ~ . ... en C,) ~ z ~ CI CIS I- CI e- E5ì 0 CI CI 0 CI :t: CI 0 CI &! .r: >- i t: .t:J CI 0 õ = i c E ~ C,) C,) C,) In 0 CI "0 .( .( C,) ... ~ CI In 0 ::E c. ..: c: 01 c: a ~ 0 >- In c: CI -= C,) :E i Q) C,) 0 (f) c. Q) ..... 0 0 c: ë6 vi a: að .r: 01 01 ::J ... :E c: c: == == ái i (.) In Q) ::E 0 "0 C Õ (J (J 0 "0 c: CI CI Q) ::E = = :t CI ::J C,) 1ã ëü ... ¡: In ë = .... c: c: 01 0 Q) 0 ëï: Q) i ::E ëi ... (f) a. CII CII ::E = 15 CI :t:! Õ = ëü ëü ~ 9 C,) > ëï: C,) 0 C,) Q) :t: ~ 0 :g ò ~ ¡: ::E )( - c ::> .( ... ð c: In CI C,) (II 0 0 c c - CI "0 - Q) c: "0 ::> ~ In ¡¡¡ I c: Q) ~ 0 I ~ 0 c: c: 0 0 0 't: 0 -æ 0 (f) Q) "0 ~ i ... 0 Q) C,) Q) Q) ~ 0 ... ... ... 0 0 ¡¡: £: E5ì ¡¡¡ ã! :; .r: c. 0 0 w C,) ¡;! .r: ~ a. 01 c: ~ ¡¡¡ 0 0 ¡¡: - E ::E In = f!.! 0 0 0 :I: i E 0 ¡: (f) ~ "0 0 ::J Q) C. Q) ::J CI Q) >- E Õ c: £: E C,) co C,) ê c. 15 Q) ¡¡: ..... C,) CI Q) C,) C,) 0 Q) 0 (.) ëü 15 > (f) c. .a c: c: G a ái ~ t: ~ W ::J 0 15 0 ... In ... ë6 0 Q) ~ "0 0 (.) ¿ Q) ~ (f) ¡¡: a: ¡¡: "0 ë c c 0 ~ c ... Q) C,) 0 ::J t: ~ C. ::J :t ë6 a. a. (f) ...J (f) ¡¡: ::J ~ ~ 0 ¡¡: 0 c a. :J Q) "0 0 0 (f) g g g 8 8 g g g 8 8 ~ .... 5 0 .... ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 .... g g S S S S S S g g g g g g g ~ 0 5 .... .... .... .... 5 .... g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g 0 0 0 0 0 0 ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ~ I ëü .a u « >- CI) .... 0 <I) <I) :J c: I- '5 en c: w 0 01 c: 0 E 0 :J CI) -1 c: 0 LL CI) 0 ca ~ x d W ~ .E W ~ uf .... a: J: <I) 0'0 ~ a: j ~ U)~ .::: ,!!¡ '5 rD€ c: w J 0 I c: -1 Z 0 ~ Õ ~ 0 -~ § -1 Õ ~ u ca ø " 11 : u. : , , , mu u · . . . _u u_~u__;'u" · . . . _u c__ ------------ - - u:__ u _u u_ ~ --------------------- · . . . · . . . . · . . . · . . . i ( · . . . . . .... : i . I I I I ~ .I I ...., : - . . - - : ~ :1:1: , , . , , , &! ' , , , , , , , , , , , 0 · , , · . , , , , , , , · , . · . , , , , , . , -ui-I- ' , , - u .-----..--- r 'u - -, - u 'u uC - u -------....--- --- _u · . . . · . . . · . . . ì · . . . · . . . · . . . · . . . , , , · . . . ~ · . . . · . . . · . . . , , , I() z · . . . · . . . · . . . m ' , , · . . . · . . . · . . . · . . . .... · . . . , . . : · . . . ---~-------------.._-- ---..-----..--.. _u u_ · . . . · . . . _~Juu " , · . . . · . . . · . . . : · . . . , . , · . . . · . . . ~ · . . . · . . . · . . . 0 · . . . · . . . -[. · . . . · . . . · . . . · , , , , , '-- u_ -Ur-r"" ' , , ---..¡---..;".._- u_ ....... -:- -.... _u -"-l-"--[---l"---~--- ---~.._-... ¡- en <I) E ca z ~ CI) CI) {! CI) i 6' i 6' 0 ëi) ëi) ëi) ::E I ::E I ëi) '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 E '0 0 0 (II 0 (II E t:: (II 0 0 0 (II c: 0 c: 0 c: ::E ::E ::E :I: 0 0 c: u. (II 0 :J c: ::E .c ¡¡: 0 ¡¡: 0 E i c. :J (II :::I S :::I 0 (II E a: ~ (II (II ~ Q) u ëü u. <I) a: ~ c: c: <I) u <I) <I) (II 1ã iñ 0 0 II: .... 0 0 ëü <I) <I) ëü <I) <I) E 13 ~ ,!!¡ 01 U. 0 II: '0 <I) ...: :::I ø .::: ø u c: u. ca :¡ 0 u u E E u .::: u ø 0 IE IC CI) ë. c: C) 0 ë .... C) '0 '0 '0 ~ ø (II ø (II :e ~ ~ t:: <I) <I) (II u. 0 0 c: a: c. a.. :t: :t: c: c: fã 0.: (II 8 0.: 0 <I) c. 1ã C) 'Ó (II E w w 0 0 c: ~ ca ~ ::J '0 ~ .... 0 .... .... 0 u ~ C) ~ 0 C) '0 0 0 (II 0.: 0 0.: 0 0 ï: ::E .!:::! :J Q ~ ëi) t:: a.. 1¡ C) i ... ... iñ .... '5 IX! 0 1¡ C) 01 C) 01 01 01 <I) C) C) :J <I) 0 C) C) ëi) 0 c: IC 0 uf 3: Q 1¡ 1¡ 1¡ 1¡ '5 E C) c: c: c: - 13 (II É c. .... £ c: ::E c: c: c: Õ C) ~ 01 I C) = E :::I :::I :::I E E E C) c: 'C 'C fã 01 C) i!: E C) 0 ~ ë. a: E '5 .... II: c: t:: (II '0 CI) (II CI) '0 C) C) '0 ... 2 w 0 :J 0 ;B E ;B ;B ;B E E E 0 ~ ~ .::: a.. c ø ... :::I 0 i c: ì 'C <I) J: UJ C 0 ::) 0 ::) ::) ::) 0 w a: II: 0 IX! c: <I) 'C J: ¡¡: ::E a.. ::E C) '0 0 0 0 ~ g g ø I:> ~ g g g g g :g 8 g g g :g 8 ..... ,..: ~ " " ~ ... .... .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g :g 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I:> ~ ~ ~ ~ " " ,..: ,..: ~ ,..: ,..: 8 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ~ ... ê ~ o ~ ~ :E I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Approve Final Pay Estimate NO.4 in the amount of $14,991 19 to .JR.! P~ving. In~ for Holirf~y Heights Agenda Number: Elementary School, Traffic Safety Improvements 12/11/95 Subject: PA'!' 95-22 This project was awarded by Council on June 12, 1995 (PW 95-35) for $149,911.92. There were no change orders to the project, and the contractor completed the project for the amount bid. The project was substantially completed on August 11, 1995. It is now complete and all final adjustments have been made. The City/BISD Agreement on traffic safety for streets adjacent to the Holiday Heights Elementary School (PW 94-26) outlined specific improvements to be made during the summer of 1994 and 1995. This project completes all work to be done according to the agreement. BISD will reimburse the City $98,609.64, as specified in the agreement. Funding Source: Sufficient funds of $151 ,000 were previously appropriated for construction by Council on 6/12/95, PW 95-35. Recommendation: "'--, Staff recommends Council approve final payment to JRJ Paving, Inc. in the amount of $14,991.19. Finance Review Acct. Number 13-23-23-6000 Sufficient Funds Available FINlllce DlteC10r Page 1 of .IR.I --- (214) 869-2971 PA VINCi. INC. p,o, Box 59934 11332 Mathis St.. Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75229 * * * I N V 0 I C ~ * * * ·7"77·"" CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 ¡::o .. 0 . BOX ~3~~0.60(? NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 7Ó18:;:~ JOB 95147 HOLIDAY HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ITEly! DEt;CF, I F:'T I O" 1 .. PF~EPt":~ I I,IG F,OW '" <~ · UNCLASSIFIED STREET EXCAVATI u · L I 1'1r:~ TRE(.'1 TlylENT (6 II ) 4 .. HYDRATED LIME (30M/SY) I:: ~, .. F:E:[I,IF COI'ICF~ETE P{i'JEMEI'H (5") 6 .. REINF CONCR INTEGRAL CURB (6 -7 / · F~EII'IF COI'·IC CUF~F:: W/GUTTEI:-': (6" B .. I:-':EH,fF COI'ICI~:ETE SIDEI.JJAU< (4") (;> "WIN: ( ,~BPI"¡~L T ) PL,~ Y p.IF~E(~ ( 4" 1.0 · CONCRETE RIPRAP 11 .. DUlyIPt')TEF, PI~D (~5") 12 · SEEDING-HYDROMULCH TYPE I II'I\)OICE H E:::;TII'1I~TI:: ** Et;TIlylt,TE: PEF~IOD COI'-1TI:-':(.V':T Aly!OUI,rr FŒTAII'·(.,GE P U'1 1'-1 OUt,t,ITITY UHIT 1.000 LS 1006..000 CY 214~5.. 000 SY ;':')2..170 H,I 2076.000 SY 12~:)6. 000 LF (~1. 000 LF 476..000 BY 3~:)1. 000 SY ~~~~ .. 000 SY 200..000 SF ~:)2:':) .. 000 SY '7'¿~'7'7 P(')GE r.+ 8r. I:-':ETan I 01',1 10/25/95 TO 11/25/9 ~1¡1(::¡9,9:!.2 10~',o: UI'-IITS COlyIPLETED/ UNIT ESTIMATED EARNED PRICE THIS MONTH TO DATE B ~IOO . 000 1.00 B500.0 5.410 :L 00.5 . 00 ~A42. 4 :1..800 ~~145.. 00 3861.0 9~~ . 000 32. :1.7 2959.6· 19.850 ~~076. 00 41208.6' 1..000 :1.236.00 :1.236.0' 15.000 91.00 136~-"- 0, ~~7 .. 000 ¿P 6 . 00 1;~8~'2. O· 10.000 ;':')31.00 ;':,310. O· 40.000 ~~2 . 00 880 . 01 4.000 ;:~OO . 00' 800 . 01 2.000 :323 .. OOr 646. O( .JR.J Ia (214) 869-2971 1·...,.··,(··"·.., 7' '.;~ .;," '7 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 P.O.. BOX 820609 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PA VINCi. INC. * * * I N V 0 ICE * * * P,O, Box 59934 11332 Mathis St., Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75229 Ir·II.IOICE H ESTII'I(',TE H E~)TIt'It-ITE ¡::'E~t'i:ICm C(J'ITI:;':f~¡CT f~I'10UI'lr F~ET{.-III'lf~GE 76:1.82 JOB 95147 HOLIDAY HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ITErl DH?CF~ I PT I Dr·1 :I. :,':') · F!::F..:TILIZER 14 · S1ï:;':IPHIG :I. ~:.:. · F~ELOCATE FEI'·ICE 'I .1. .. PFŒPAI:;': H'IG I:;':OW ,., .I.:' .. UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION ,,) .. LIITIE TF~EATITtEI'-IT (6") '-'~ · HYDRATED LIME (30#/SY) PI.J,I'~ OU(~I-'ITITY UI',IIT 12..000 LB :I. .000 U3 17:1..000 LF 1.000 LS 418.000 CY <,7):1.4.000 SY 1~:)' 700 1'1'1 ~5 · I~:EINF COr.ICFŒTE PAVEI1EI'-IT (5") 87:1..000 SY .':> · REINF CONCR INTEGRAL CURB (6 6'Z7.000 U-- 7 .. REII'IF COI'IC CUFm W/GUTTEI=\: (.5" 244.000 LF :3 .. F~:EII'IF COI'ICRETE SIDEWAU< (4") 270..000 SY ,"i '7 . SEEDING-HYDROMULCH TYPE I 29'-'I .000 SY 9497 pr-lm:: .~ 8~ ¡:;:I:::TEI'-IT I OH 10/25/95 TO 11/25/9 ~1;:i.49~. <7'12 10~·.: Ur.1I T['; CCWtPL.ETED/ UNIT ESTIMATED EARNED PRICE THIS MONTH TO DATE :1..000 12..00 :1.2.0' ~300 . 000 :1..00' 300 . Ot 7.000 171 . 00· 1197 .O( ~j20(). 000 l.OOf 5200.0( 5" '-'HO 418.00( :?2t>l .31 :1..800 <,7)14.00( 164::'..2< <ï~~ . 000 :l.3.70( 1260.4( 1,'7' . 850 871.00( 17289. ~:)~ 1.000 6~~7. OO( 627 .O( :1.0.000 244.00( 2440.0C 27.000 ~~70 . ooe 7290.0e 2.000 291.1.00( ~,88 . OC .IR.I ~ (214) 869-2971 (?')i.";;.<;j CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 F' " o. E~OX 8~~OÓ09 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PA VINca. INC. * * * I N V 0 ICE * * * P.O, Box 59934 11332 Mathis St. Suite 100 Dallas. TX 75229 II-IVOICE H E::3TIr¡~TE H ES1'It'II~TE PEF;:IOD COI-ITF':I~CT AIT!OUI'IT F~ETAII-IAGE JOB 95147 HOLIDAY HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ·7 f.):1. t~~~ ITFIT\ DESCF~IPTIOH LO · FEJnILIZEI~ 1.1 · STF.:IPUm 1 ,t. · Pf';:EPAR I 1-1(3 I~OW '-' ,.: · UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION ":¡ · L11'1E Tr-~EI~TITIEI-IT (Ó") f.+ · HYDRATED LIME (30#/SY) I:: ~. PI_AN DUAI-ITITY UI-IIT 11.000 LB 1.000 LS 1.000 LS 298,,000 CY K")9 . 000 SY 12.580 TI'-1 · REnW COI-ICF~ETEI:'AVE"~MENT (5") 819.000 SY Ó · F~E n·IF CO-IC I I"'¡TEGI~AL CUFŒ ( 6" :1!54.. 000 LF Q '._1 · m::II-IF COI-IC:~ETE ~3IDt:~WI~LI< (4") 53.000 SY ? .. SEEDING-HYDROMULCH TYPE I ,0 .. FERTILIZEI~ ,1 .. STF.:IPII'm 1 ~56 . 000 SY 6.000 LB 1.000 L.S S->497 pr¡GE 4 &: I~ETEI"'¡TIOt'-1 10/25/95 TO 11/25/9 ~1;1f.~(1:,91~~ 10~'.: UI-II1'S CO\yIPL.ETED/ UNIT ESTIMATED EARNED PRICE THIS MONTH TO DATE 1.000 1:L . OO( l:I. . O( 150.000 1 . OO( 1 ~=.O . O( 2000.000 1 .OO( 2000.0C 5.410 29B . OO( 161;~. :U: 1.800 839.. OOC :1. ~i:I.O. 2C 92.000 12. !58( :1.1.57.3¿ 19.850 819.00C 162::.7.1 ~ 1.000 354.00C 354.0C ~~7 . 000 5~:) .. OOC 14~:")1 .. OC ~'~.. 000 156.00C 312 . OC :1..000 6.00C é¡ . OC ~:)OO . 000 1.00e :;")00. OC .JR.J .. (214) 869-2971 (~;I (;:II:~.) <;:0 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 ¡:. . (]. BOX 820/:,0<;' NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS PA VINGI. INC. * * * I N V 0 ICE * * * 76182 II-I"./OICE H EST I P"!f; TE ** E~;TIr-I(.:ìTE PEF:IOD CO!,rn::':f;CT ('d'10UI'rr ¡:~ET (.1 I !"!(.IG!::: JOB 95147 HOLIDAY HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ITEM DESCRIPTION L2 . RELOCATE FENCE 1 . HANDICAP RAMP HC2 P,O. Box 59934 11332 Mathis St.. Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75229 <7'4<7'7 PAGE It ,~: F~ETE!',IT I 01'1 10/25/95 TO 11/25/<7" ~1>149,9:!.2 10~·,: F'L('d'l OUAr,ITITY UI-,IIT LJi'IITS CCWIPLETED/ UNIT ESTIMATED EARNED PRICE THIS MONTH TO DATE 20.000 LF 7.000 20.00( 140 . O( 2.000 U3 750.000 2.00( 1 500 . O( .... .lR.I (214) 869-2971 PAVING. INC. P,o. Box 59934 11332 Mathis St., Suite 100 Dallas. TX 75229 * * * I N V 0 ICE * * * i;?';)(.;ì<.ÿ' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 P . 0.. Bœ< 82060<ï NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 7¿>l82 HNCn: U:: H ESTII-'!ATE~ g E~=)TIIYII~ITE F:'EI;:10D COI',fT¡:;:tICT 1~IYI(JUI'4T F;:ETf.'I1I'-I(~GE 7"'1?7 ¡::'I~CìE l,f i?,.; I=\:ETEI'fr I 01'4 10/25/?5 TO 11/25/9 ~1;149:, ':;:Ol~~ :l.0~'~ JOB 95147 HOLIDAY HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY EST I rlr-, TED EAF~:I'IED (~IYI0UI'~TS THIS ITIOI'ITI- (.:'tl'10UI-..JTS TD DATE TOTAL AMOUNT OF WORK DONE .00 149:,911..9: LEEf:> ¡:;:ET A I I'-Ir-\GE .00 .0' OTHER RETAINAGE DUE FROM PREVIOUS ESTIMATE 14,'7''7'1.19 AMOUNT DUE Ef:>TIMATE» 4 & RETENTION 14:,991.19 149:,91:1..9: LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 132 :,925.4: UNPAID BILLINGS AS OF 10/25/95 1,9?5.30 1 !' 9?~:,. 3( TOTAL OUTSTf.'¡/'IDIW3 (.:'IS 9h~'HI~3 ESTII'1I~n~ PF;:EPAF,ED BY ----r.1L-.-\..f.------.--------------------- ------_-_JL~1:5:.=1_C 16,986.49 16 ,986 .4< D(~TE ~'J ~7-q <j dJl ***************** * * * 14,?91.19 * * * ***************** FINAL ESTIMATE RETENTIDN DUE - I {- dq-!( ~ (£~ &t<. 1- 3ö..cyS ~ (:iß CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Approve Final Pay Estimate NO.5 in the Amount of Subject: $10,132 67 to M A Vinson Construction Co line for Agenda Number: Holiday Lane, Section B - Curb and Gutter and Sidewalk Improvements 12/11/95 PA'!' 95-23 This project was awarded by Council on June 12,1995 (PW 95-29) for $130,745.05 to M.A. Vinson Construction Co., Inc. The contract amount was reduced from $130,745.05 to $121,034.05 after the removal of proposed sidewalk quantities on the north side of Holiday Lane. Final payment brings the total to $111,726.72, which is $9,307.34 under the revised contract amount. The savings is mainly from miscellaneous paving allowance monies not used. The project was substantially completed on the contract completion date of September 1, 1995. All final adjustments have now been made. The contract stipulates that the concrete testing is to be paid by the contractor. The City paid for the testing and has not been reimbursed. The contractor has agreed to allow the City to withhold the amount owed from his final pay. The amount to be paid to the contractor will be $10,132.67 ($11,172.67 less $1,040.00 for testing). Funding Source: On August 28, 1995 (PW 95-57) $265,000 was reallocated from this project to the Rodger Line Drive project to help cover a budget overrun. Staff has recently become aware that only $125,000 of the $265,000 was available for reallocation. Therefore, the Holiday Lane, Section B budget needs the $140,000 replaced. The additional funds have been budgeted in the 1996 Bond Sale. Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve final payment to M.A. Vinson Construction in the amount of $10,132.67 and authorize the appropriation of $140,000 for this project. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operatin Budget_ Other, 20-01-01-6000 Fin..... Director ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION "EM Page 1 of · /Z1 / ;æ ~/l7l$ KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas December 2, 1995 '; ~~~n~1ß~ ~ "LS 1.-j __I\.\ \ \ D~ \\\\1\\ \ DEC - A \995 ~' Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-371 (B), CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HillS, HOLIDAY lANE, SECTION B, CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND MISC. IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.5 & FINAL Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.5 and Final, dated December 1, 1995, made payable to M.A. Vinson Construction Co., Inc., in the amount of $ 11,172.67, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of October 31, 1995. The quantities and conditions of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Mr. Ken Matheson, as acknowledged to us by telephone yesterday, (but not yet signed), and we have checked the item extensions and additions. The following is a summary to the project status to date: TOTAL CONTRACT PERCENT BREAKDOWN THIS MONTH EARNINGS AMOUNT COMPLETE (Incl. Retainage) Paving $ 11,172.67 $ 111,726.72 $ 121,034.05 92.31 TOTAL $ 1 1,172.67 $ 111,726.72 $ 121,034.05 92.31 TIME (Calendar Days) 120 60 200.00 The original contract amount was $130,754.05, but the contract was reduced to $121,034.05 after removal of proposed sidewalk quantities on the north side of Holiday Lane from the contract, as directed by City Staff. Future developers of property along Holiday Lane which does not currently have sidewalk, will be required to build the sidewalk later when they develop. Contractor earnings total $111,726.72 based on as-built quantities and contract unit prices. Contractor earnings are, therefore, $9,307.34 under the revised Contract Amount. The savings results primarily from unused additional sidewalk quantities and an unused miscellaneous paving allowance, or contingency fund. Total project savings is $19,027.33 under the original contract amount. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO 817/267-3367 . FAX 817/354-4389 Page 2, December 2, 1995 Holiday Lane, Section B, Contractor's Estimate No.5 and Final The two (2) year period of maintenance begins on this date, and therefore, will terminate on December 2, 1997. The maintenance obligation includes repair of curb and gutter, sidewalk and concrete pavement cracks or failures not caused directly by subgrade or subbase failures resulting from construction by others. The contractor's schedule was dependent upon prior construction of underground utilities, subgrade preparation, and asphalt paving by the County and others; therefore, we do not recommend assessment of liquidated damages for delays in project completion beyond the scheduled completion date of September 1, 1995. In the absence of any negative reports concerning the condition of the project, and after the Contractor has signed an Affidavit stating that all bills and subcontractors have been paid, we recommend that this final partial payment, in the amount of $ 11,172.67, be made to M.A. Vinson Construction, Inc., P.O. Box 185577, Ft. Worth, Texas 76181. We will be present at the December 11, 1995, meeting to assist you with answers to any questions which the Council may have concerning this project. Please call if you have any questions concerning this project. -~Od?-~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RW A/lld/Enclosures/FinaIB.371/ xc: Mr. C.A. Sanford, City Manager Mr. Randy Shiflet, Assistant City Manager Mr. Larry Cunningham, Assistant City Manager Mr. Charles Harris, Director of Finance > Mr. Mike Curtis, P.E., Capital Projects Coordinator Mr. Ken Matheson, City Inspector M.A. Vinson Construction Co.