HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1993-07-26 Agendas
~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 26, 1993 - 6:00 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820.
I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
1. Renaming of Certain Streets Within City -
Councilman Sibbet (5 Minutes)
2. PS 93-27 Consideration of an Amendment to the
Subdivision Regulations, Ordinance No. 1579, to
Require the Construction of Sidewalks on Double
and Triple Frontage Lots by the Developer -
Ordinance No. 1909 (Agenda Item No. 14)
(10 Minutes)
3. GN 93-100 Contract with Tarrant County for Tax Collections
(Agenda Item No. 17) (5 Minutes)
4. GN 93-101 Update of Indirect Cost Allocation from General
Fund to Utility Fund (Agenda Item No. 18)
(5 Minutes)
5. GN 93-102 Indirect Cost Allocation Study Park and
Recreation Facilities Development Corporation
(Agenda Item No. 19) (10 Minutes)
6. PU 93-48 Authorization to Solicit Bids for Removal of
Debris and Clean-up of Family Aquatic Park
(Agenda Item No. 22) (5 Minutes)
7. PW 93-34 Bursey Road Senior Adult Center Parking Lot
Improvements (Agenda Item No. 26) (10 Minutes)
8. PW 93-35 Approval of Contract for Asphalt Milling (Agenda
Item No. 27) (5 Minutes)
9. IR 93-77 Drainage Utility Fee for BISD (5 Minutes)
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 2
! NUMBER I ITEM ¡ ACTION TAKEN I
! 10. IR 93-105 I Speed Humps (5 Minutes) I
11. Other Items
12. *Executive Session (15 Minutes)
a. Personnel
b. Briefing on Pending Litigation
c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition
13. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m.
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is
contemplated, it will be taken in open session.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 26, 1993
For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion
_ and/or action.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
1. Call to Order
2. Invocation
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting
July 12, 1993
5. Presentations by Boards & Commissions
Beautification Commission Minutes
6. Presentation of "Yard of the Month"
Awards
7. Presentation of "Landscape of the
Month" Award
8. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent
Agenda
9. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by
Asterisk (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22,
23, 24, & 25)
10. PZ 93-11 Public Hearing to Consider Revisions to
the Zoning Ordinance No. 1874
Regarding the Masonry Requirement -
Ordinance No. 1906
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 2
! NUMBER ! ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
11. PZ 93-12 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request of Wes Bannister
to Rezone Tracts 3A1 and 3A1B, Eden
Survey, Abstract 499, from AG
Agriculture to R-2 Single Family
Residential (Located on the West Side of
Eden Road, north of Ashcraft Drive) -
Ordinance No. 1907
12. PS 93-20 Public Hearing to Consider Revisions to
the Master Thoroughfare Plan Regarding
Douglas Lane - Ordinance No. 1904
13. PS 93-21 Public Hearing to Consider Revisions to
the Master Thoroughfare Plan Regarding
Holiday Lane - Ordinance No. 1905
*14. PS 93-27 Consideration of an Amendment to the
Subdivision Regulations, Ordinance No.
1579, to Require the Construction of
Sidewalks on Double and Triple
Frontage Lots by the Developer -
Ordinance No. 1909
* 15. GN 93-98 Tri-County Electric Rate Increase -
Ordinance No. 1908
! * 16. GN 93-99 I Property Tax Refund I I
*17. GN 93-100 Contract with Tarrant County for Tax
Collections
* 18. GN 93-101 Update of Indirect Cost Allocation from
General Fund to Utility Fund
*19. GN 93-102 Indirect Cost Allocation Study Park and
Recreation Facilities Development
Corporation
I~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 3
! NUMBER ! ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
*20. GN 93-103 Authorizing Eminent Domain
Proceedings - Resolution No. 93-33
*21. PU 93-47 Authorization to Purchase Fuel on "Spot
Market Basis"
*22. PU 93-48 Authorization to Solicit Bids for
Removal of Debris and Clean-up of
Family Aquatic Park
*23. PU 93-49 Strummer Drive Widening Project
Residential Acquisition Lot 13, Block D,
Richland Oaks Addition
*24. PU 93-50 Strummer Drive Widening Project
Residential Acquisition Lot 1, Block E,
Richland Oaks Addition
*25. PU 93-51 Approve Bid for Sale of House at 4800
Nevada Trail
26. PW 93-34 Bursey Road Senior Adult Center
Parking Lot Improvements
27. PW 93-35 Approval of Contract for Asphalt Milling
28. Citizens Presentation
29. Adjournment POSTED
i.~ ðc?-93
DatE>
,~ . í -.J /"I
\-/- '--I -..J V I , v
I
Tune
City Secretary
~(7 -;{j~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-~--
~
I
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
NO.IR 93-106
DMe: July 26, 1993
Su~ect: Petition Pertaining to Master Thoroughfare Plan - Holiday
Lane & Douglas Lane
A petition containing 188 signatures in favor of the removal of Holiday
Lane from the Master Thoroughfare Plan (PS 93-21) has been filed. The
petition also requests that any expansion of Douglas Lane not go
through the Park site (PS 93-20). A copy of the petition is on file in
the City Secretary's. office.
Respectfully submitted,
Q..e~~
S:-:nette Rewis
City Secretary
JR:ph
-------- .--.- -.-----------..- ---
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IÞ
I
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. T"R 93..103
Date:
July 26, 1993
Subject:
Lost Pet Hotline
The Animal Care and Control Division has researched the possibility
of implementing a "Lost Pet Hotline" program which will enable pet
owners to call in and listen to a list of dogs and cats that have
been picked up each day.
This proqram can be established with minimal cost to the city. An
answering machine will be the only equipment required. Therë is
already a dedicated telephone line in the Center which is not being
used.
When a citizen calls the Hotline a prerecorded message will give
information about the Animal Care and Control Center, local
ordinances and animal licensing. After the message, a list of the
animals that were picked up on that day, the animals' description and
where each was picked up will be given. The Animal Care and Control
staff will record the animal information each evening before closing.
The public will be encouraged to access the Hotline when looking for
a lost pet. The Hotline will be available twenty-four hours a day.
It should be noted that all persons who call the Hotline will be
encouraged to visit the Center to look for lost pets. Often the
owner's description of his/her pet may be different from the
Officer's description.
Information on the Lost Pet Hotline program will be included in the
August water bill mailing. We will request coverage from the local
media, citicable and radio.
This program has the support of the Animal Shelter Advisory Board and
we feel that it will be very beneficial to pet owners as well as to
the Animal Care and Control Division.
Respectfully Submitted,
£c
Randy Shiflet
Assistant City Manager
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~.
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
lit
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
IR 93-77
No.
^
~ k1 Date: July 12, 1993
~~
V Subject: Drainage Utility Fee for BISD
The school district has asked that we consider a different method of
computing their drainage utility fee. Their current bill is computed
using the total acreage for each school site. They feel playground
property should be treated as undeveloped/agricultural acreage which is
not assessed a fee. School sites totaling 168. 7 acres currently
produce a fee of approximately $1,715 per month. BISD would like to
reduce the acreage assessed to 80.13 for a fee of approximately $957.
per month. This would reduce their fee by $9,100 per year. We should
point out that the method used to determine their current fee is less
than we would charge for a site that has been fully developed. As an
example, the 80 acres they want to be charged for would carry a
different run off coefficient which would produce almost the exact fee
they are now paying. Official action is not required but since the
amount is almost $10,000 annually we would appreciate your input.
Respectfully submitted,
t'4 h~~0
C . A . I?n~:¡d-
Deputy City Manager
CAS/gp
- ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I·
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
IR
No.
-105
D~e: July 26, 1993
Subject: Speed Humps
A policy for the subject traffic control device is attached as
instructed by Council. The policy is patterned after the City of
Dallas policy with some modifications and covers the following items:
· Eligibility requirements
· Cost responsibility
· Hump removal and/or alteration
· Location requirement
· Procedures for installation
· Design requirements
The attached policy and procedures can be styled into an ordinance for
your approval upon your request.
Attachment
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS
I·
~-
I
I
I
1
1
I
1
Ie
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I-
I
c.
ROAD HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY
A.
GENERAL
Road humps are an effective and appropriate device for safely reducing vehicle
speeds on certain types of streets when installed in accordance with the provisions
of this policy.
In order for road hump installations to be effective, they should be located selectively
in accordance with defined transportation engineering criteria for the purpose of
mitigating documented speeding problems. Proper installation will also minimize
driver frustration and encourage safe driving practices.
This policy promotes reasonable opportunities for residents and property owners
most affected by a proposed road hump to participate together in the process that
leads to its installation. It also provides for a sharing of the road hump installation
cost between the City and the neighborhood under certain conditions.
B.
DEFINITIONS
For the context of this policy only:
APPLICATION for road humps include the petition;
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS include single-family houses,
townhouses and duplexes;
ROAD HUMP is a geometric design feature of a roadway, consisting of a raised area
in the roadway pavement surface extending transversely across the travel way, whose
primary purpose is to reduce the speed of vehicles traveling along that roadway;
SPEEDS are 85th percentile speeds;
STREET refers to the street length that must be petitioned. It is a 1,000 foot
segment generally centered on the location of the humps, or the length of the block,
whichever is greater. If the 1,000 foot segment extends into any part of an adjacent
block, it includes the entire length of the adjacent block, unless separated by an
intervening thoroughfare, traffic signal or offset intersection.
EUGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
All of the following criteria must be satisfied for a street to be considered eligible
for road hump installation.
I"
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
4.
Page Two
1.
Petition
A petition that documents that a minimum of two-thirds of the households in
low density residential dwellings on the street support its installation.
2.
Location of the Street
The uses on the street where the road hump is proposed must be composed
primarily of low density residential dwellings.
3.
Operational Characteristics of the Street
a. The street must be used to provide access to abutting low density
residential properties (local residential street) and/or to collect traffic
for such streets (residential collector).
b. There must be no more than one moving lane of traffic in each
direction.
c. Traffic volumes must be more than 500 vehicles per day but less than
8,000 vehicles per day.
d. Vehicle speeds must equal or exceed the Speed Criteria of 35 miles
per hour (mph).
e. The street must not be an identified primary route for emergency
vehicles; this refers to a route that is heavily used due to the proximity
of the emergency vehicle facility. These routes are subject to change.
f. The street must have a speed limit of 30 mph as determined in
accordance with State Law.
Geometric Characteristics of the Street
a. The street must have adequate sight distance to safely accommodate
the hump as determined by the Department of Public Works.
b. The street must not have curves or grades that prevent safe placement
of the humps. Humps may be located on streets that contain curves
and/or grades, but the hump itself must not be located within a
horizontal curve, on a vertical grade greater than 8% or on their
immediate approaches.
I"
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
G.
Page Three
c. The street must be paved. If there are no curbs, a special design must
be used to prevent vehicle run-arounds.
d. The elevation of property adjacent to a hump location must be above
top of curb, as determined by the Department of Public Works, to
minimize potential flooding due to the presence of the hump in the
roadway.
D.
COST RESPONSIBILITY
The cost for the road hump installation (including signs, pavement markings and, if
necessary, special design features such as curbing or guard rail) is the residents'
responsibility. The cost for transportation engineering studies and maintenance of
the road hump is the responsibility of the City. The term resident, when used in cost
sharing, does not necessarily refer to the petitioners. It is used to define the share
of the cost that is not the responsibility of the City and could be paid by one or more
of the residents or from other private sources.
E.
ROAD HUMP REMOVAL AND ALTERATION
The process for road hump removal or alteration by residents is the same as the
process for installation. The cost is the residents' responsibility to pay.
F.
ROAD HUMP LOCATION
A road hump must not be located in front of a property if the occupant objects to
its placement or, in the case of a property containing low density multiple dwellings,
if a majority of the households on the property object to its placement. Fulfillment
of this requirement is the responsibility of the applicant(s).
DESIGN STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES
The City Manager shall prepare and maintain current design standards and
installation procedures for road humps in accordance with this policy.
I·
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I-
I
3.
Page Four
PROCEDURES FOR ROAD HUMP INSTALLATION
1.
The initial request for the installation of road humps must originate from the
residents living on the street. A request in writing from a resident or representative
must be forwarded to:
Road Hump Program
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
P. O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
2.
A preliminary determination of eligibility based on available traffic data will be made
in a timely manner.
A H the street is determined not to be eligible the applicant(s) will be notified
in writing giving the reason.
B. The decision may be appealed in writing to the Director of Public Works
within 15 days of the notification date. The Director will review the
determination and respond to the applicant(s) within 30 days of the appeal
request.
C. H the street is determined to be eligible for consideration, a meeting will be
arranged between the applicant(s) and staff to define the petition area, the
approximate road hump location range. The applicant(s) will be instructed
to submit a petition indicating that a minimum of two-thirds of the low density
dwelling households on the street support the installation of road humps as
provided in the Road Hump Policy. Only petition forms supplied by the City
of North Richland Hills or exact duplicates may be used for this purpose.
After verification of the petitions, the Department will conduct the necessary
transportation engineering studies and solicit comments and recommendations of
other agencies. A determination of the street's eligibility for road hump installation
will be made in a timely manner, based on the Road Hump Policy.
A H the street is determined not to be eligible for road hump installation, the
applicant(s) will be notified in writing giving the reason.
I·
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
Page Five
B. The decision may be appealed in the same manner as in Section 2.
C. If the street is determined to be eligible, the street will be placed on a list of
streets eligible for road hump installation.
4.
The City of North Richland Hills will make a determination of the total installation
cost.
5.
Once eligible for road hump installation, owners of real property lying within the
notification area will be notified of the action by the City of North Richland Hills.
The notification area consists of the area within 200 feet of the boundary of the
street. The measurement of the 200 feet includes streets and alleys. The notice will
include a return form to indicate support or objection to the proposed installation.
6.
If owners of 20 percent or more of the real property within the notification area
object to the installation within 30 days of the notice, then the street will be removed
from the list of streets eligible for road hump installation and a public hearing will
be scheduled at the City Council. Notification of the hearing will include the
applicant(s) and owners of real property within the notification area. In addition, a
reasonable effort will be made to notify each low density residential household along
the street and area neighborhood associations of the public hearing.
7.
If owners of less than 20 percent of the real property within the notification area
object to the installation or the City Council approves the installation after a public
hearing, then the City of North Richland Hills will place the street on a list of streets
approved for road hump installation.
8.
Once a street is placed on the list of streets approved for road hump installation, the
City will submit a statement to the representative of the residents for the cost of the
road hump installation. Upon receipt of payment of the cost, the humps will be
installed as scheduling permits. If full payment has not been received within one
year from the statement date, the street will be removed from the list of streets
approved for road hump installation and all monies received, if any, returned to the
payor.
For the initial year of this program after the official passage of its ordinance, the
speed humps price will be as listed below:
Two humps - $500.00
Three humps - 650.00
Four Humps - 800.00
I'
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
Page Six
After the initial year, the City may review the prices and revise them based on actual
staff data. If no changes are recommended by staff, these prices will be used until
formal modification by Council.
I' ra >t ra -..
d r-f ctj +J en
ctj r-f ° ( ) ~
cø ~ ctj .(&1 0::
.r-f ~
~- (.) ° (1) St!J(J)- p.,
r:: s:: ..c:: E-IQ
cø Q) +J :sfilE-l -..
~ ..:3. en
d °
. r-f +J =1ØtQ ~
~ctj Z 0
I r-f E-li rxJ 0
o[ r-f E-IU) Z ::x::
0 U)o 0 U
+J · r-f M ·u ::x:: en
+J r--- t-f p.,
I (1) ( ) :>t
S>t ( ) ~
(.) r-f
0)." r-f '" rxJ
+J...-1 ." ,...., ø:::
I ra ° :x:: ..:3~ ctS ~
tJ'p., .r-f
.r-f '0 =1(1. +J r:z::1
......04 r:: .r-f ø:::
..as ctj E-IO r:: rxJ
I s:: ° :;j ...-1 U) 111 · r-f :x:
0) ::x:: ~ .E-IU 8
QJ+J'O (.) t-f..(1)
~ ° CU ." OI'a1( ) ~
+Jr:: · 0:: Oø:Qrø H
(1) 0>. E-I(l.t-f(1)
I ..a o::.µ ..c:: U)r-f 0
CO QJ." .µ ~.=p., ~
~..c::U ~ Ot-f ~
'O'µ(1) 00 C/) ~
ZeD en
4-f..c:: r-f I'a1 rxJ r:z::1.
I 0::
dO'µ 4-f 'D . ø::: ~
° Or--- 0 0
." ( ) r:: Þ:: 0 Z
.µr::ctj >t At ~
· " O..c:: .µ><: 0
I . .µ .r-f .µ .r-f 8 H
0 QJ CI) U 8
t-f ~.r-f ~ H
E-I > (1) -..( ) 8
.... co°..c:: ~,...., r:z::1
E-I ~.µ 0...... p.,
Ie I'a1 .r-f ~ 0 .µ · r-f =
At ..d cø:x: 1%1
+JQ)(Q d t) :x:
At ..c::Q) · " '0 E-I 8
~ Ö' +J ." "Cd = Z·
~ +J ~ ctS HÞ
I II: .r-f +J ~ 0...-1 ø 0
d r:: CU CU O..c:: t-f CI):>t
~ o tJ't ..c:: ~ u(.) U) C,!)~
(Q ." +J ."
~ ~ (Q "C >. S~ ~~
I e r:: ..a cø
~..c:: ~:x:
~+JCU~ tJ'+J ~8
..c::ctS+JO o ~ C'e r:z::1
"C..c::co~ ~ 0 8 ~
CU +J ~ p.,Z C/) 0 .
I o ~"C r:z::1 ",8
~ "C r::. r-f ~ -.. ~ Þ 8r:z::1
r:: ctS So ~ 01 ~~
~ctS~~ ~N a IïI
0+J0Q) ::I:CX) .... ~ u8
I ~(Q( )~ ... en ~en
r:: ~...... ~ "C~ At H >1%1
o'OctS,...., ctS 0 '-" :z:
o 0 8 '-"":z:
." r:: H .r-f ~...:I I 08
+J~ +J ~ r:z::1z
I · " r:: 0
+J · ~ ~o
Q)H+J:;j ° Z Þen
~ CI)'O +J
o (1) 0 Uz
>. . u...... CJ) en Uo
I ~ ~r-f e ~ °H
1%1 Ze-e
~ ." cø ~ p., ÞÞ
Q) OJ +J 0
..c:: ..c::CJ) ~ 8 ~8
I .µr:: r:: U ...:IH
'0 ." ~ ~8
(1) d 0 co 8 en
r:: · r-f (1) .r-f Z OZ
Ö' ..a .µ U) 0 ~H
I- .r-I Q) .r-I = U 0
CJ) +J...... +J UCoð
~ cø...... QJ Q 1%1 rxJ
(1) 0.. · r-I 04 ~ ::x:: ø:::en
'0 .r-I ~ &4 r:cJ
s:: U d tJ) 1%1:r:
:;j . " ( ) ~ H enu
I .µ~ :;j ~o::
(1) ~ e: .µ 0 r:cJþ
..c:: ctS ~ QJ :z: ...:I::I:
8 o....c:: 0:: ~ p.,U
I" ·
~-
1 ~
-. z
I .~
~
I . ~
o
I ~
I ~
I u
~
I ~.
~
Ie ~.
I ~
Q
I 0
o
I ::r::
~
I 0
~
I G
~
I ~
z
I
I-
I
z
.' C5
1---1
(f)
~
Q
~
~
:=J
~
Q
~
o
~
I"
.~~~
¡-m SECTION A-A
I a..
~
~
:I:
I a
<
0
a::
I
I
I
I
I '7
I
z:
<:
-J
a...
I
V
~,£~
l],\VW.
I" ":;U.:3bIG
I~ . ~ u 0 ~
~ 0 ~: ~ ~
_,ß~ ~~~ ;
J:r~õzz
I ::: ~ì z ~ ~ ~ vi
~:;º .::)z~ ~
=~t; Z~-J ~
I~ ;!: ¡ii~ ~
.:?~ v)~V1~ ~
:::x~ ~~2f o.
_~ ~ =.. ~ _::$ ~ ~ ~ t3
~ i ~, ~ _ ~ ~ ~
1·3~O ~~~~ Q:<
=z ~~~w ~~
~ c( ~ g:I: 00:::
:, :ê16J 8òô..... (/)<
= V1 « Gj < u... c.:> a.. ~
~ ~3~ ~w-J~ ~~
1:'1~« ~Ô~~ I
z: 5 ~l. 0 w~
g~z ~zw...J ~<
:5 .<1.&.: 5g~~ (/)
z. ~ (3 ~ i ~ ~
1- - tngôz g~
=-tV1 ~;izg ~~
2~ª ~~g~ o~
;~u ~~~Q Zs
~Ë8 ;:~ä:~ g~
XOa: i])~~8 ~
a
w
~~
-J<
a..u
wO
m-J
a~
...J
~......
o a..
~~
a..~
~......
~<
:I: .
<
a-
ð~"':
a::~~
<u~
wt.=)w
ffi6~
i<li..
8;0
~-J~
w«
zo:::W
(/)~g:
-w(/)
......"'~
~wO
~~a
......
wo(/)
c.:>......~
« -,
~<':>a..
<~~
a::a~
a~I
<ow
u...Ü:I:
_«t-
N
..-=
g ~
f= 0
:I: ......
'" 0
:J ~
...... 0
w ......
w w
a:: u
...... z
en «
'-' ......
z en
ï= a .
en ...... ~
x :I: a::
w ~ a
~
~;z
~ «~
c( O=> 0
...... w~
~ ~ ~
6 I
< ~ <
~ ~ ~
~ 0::: jE
o ~ ~
...... ......~
£l. a.. «
~ ~ u
~ => 0
I I-J
W w......
...... ...... 0
< <2
U U
o 00
...J ~a
>-
«
~
~
~
c
a..
o
o
-J
z w
o ~
~ a::
u ~
w 0
(/) U
a::: (/)
~ a
~ 0
.....
to-
Z
o
a::
l&..
~
......
:I:
C>
~
Z
«
iE
w
I
......
o
.....
:~
0:)
o
(J)a::
c
zC
wZ
:::I
zo
~~
ma::
a..~
~ç::
~u
:I: <
~~
0<
Q::
«~
~(/)
«......
g~
..Jw
......0:::
o a..
Zt-
0<
c~
a::: Z
:5 : ~
a 0 ~
ã ..... ~
z w w
w w .....
a.. lL. «
ex: 0 Z
W I/") a:::
Cl. W
a z ~
t.,J ~ «
~ ~ W
...J 0
a.. £l. :>
w ~ 0
en ~ î
a a (,f).
~..J ê3 ~
:I: ~ a::: =>
(/)« < u
~~ ~ ~
~~ (3 ~ vi
az g « ~
ê3 0 t- ~:::I
0:::F= 0 ~ ~
w~ z :::: «
IQ:; 0 ~ Z
~Q a ~ ~
Q::
w
~
«
~ Q::
« v)
~ ~
~ :J
æ
a
t-
«
~'j
Q::CD
~iñ
(/) ~~
Cl. a..a..
~ z~
:I: o.
w
W (/)u
u a..z
< ~w
..J ::Ja
a.. :I:V>
b ~~
Z (3<
o Ol.t...
a ...JO
,.,; .¢
r' ex) 0) 0
ui <D
z
o
¡:::t-
<{W
Ow
Ocr:
-If-
-1(/)
«Z
u-
-I
0.....-
Ç:~
~-
3'
._ -:.v--
CD
I
CD
Z
o
J=
()
w
(f)
~
,...
~
d.~
:EÒ;
::>
:I:~~
~~g
oiñëð
I
~
«
I(5X
enaO
a..o..J
:E~m
:::I
:I:~§
2zz
~ëñ~
Oz
«<..9
0-
a::::U1
LU
--.JO
<!
uo...
0...2
>-=>
J-I
, .
E~
~
'0
~
I .
8~
Nt")
~~
I V1
CL
~
:::>
U) I
Z
0 (I)
g Z 00
e"
(i)
Z .. g~ CD LaJ z«
-~ -Jz ~ ~ «0
ò"> u_ 0
(j) ">x Z ~
-:~ .... 0- 0~
Z ~~ (I) 0
0 U). C> ~
z~ ~ 0-
~ t-"> 0< ~ z~
~o ~z u..
« wt- 0" CU) ~ ZO
U ~CI)\t O(i) Wz
~N -J ~o
0 ~wx ð~ >-~ (I) 0l.L.-
z
---1 ~~\t 9g ~ C) -
(i) (f)
Z 4c(~N CD-J o~ Ie U1
~--f ~o _CD O-z
Ü ~~~ !Jx ~- . --.Jü
~ -11» (f) o ::> t-. :j
Q:: :i..... :i ~ x ~ ~ «Z
b I o::W G: (I)
---1 ~_(D OZ ~~ ~ U
« ~~;: u..C ~
U N "j ..¡. -0::::
.....
!nÞ el.. Vi 0..«
>- w ~2
~~ to-
t-- 0
z
- ....
:<
Ie
, Z
I
I 0
t-
«
---1
I --1
,
I « ::
I t- m
(f)
z
, z
(/) c..?
ü U1
z:
~
0::::
I <t:
-.::-
~ Z
----.J 0
« J-
I U
I D- «
~ -..J
-..J
« <t
J-
(/) :: c;;
Z I
co
N
I
Z ,..,
0
C)
U1 :x::
~
~
a..
¿
::>
:x::
1_··..·-
0-
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
w
z
::J
w
<.:t
a
w
a
~
z
::(
~
I-I ~
:t: ~
~ ~~
o :!
C)~ t4~
~~ ß~
!!!<
x 0::
we
)t
>-
<
~ ~
" ~
0.. 0::
<
[l.
( þ
<
Q.
11
~
I
~
ã
w ~
C)C) "'-z
z< o~
~~ ~~
x 0:: 0<
l4J0 U.I~
I
I
.
4
4 (
I
8
g
I
N
.x
CD
L
·o~ ~~..ë
: . :::t ~~
\
+
i
¡ r
.
o
~
l<
N
(/)
CD
e:::
::>
u
t-
::>
0
:r:
t-
~
---L (/)
t-
W
W
a:::
l-
(/)
Z
0
Z
0
¡::
:5
....J
~
(/)
~
a..
2
:::)
:r:
0
«
0
0::
w
>
¡::
«
z
a::::
w
t-
--'
«
;;
"-
.
?
~
o
e
î
I' x
~
Õ
W t-
uo ~ffi
z<
I=Z ~
I ~~ ~~
x a::: 0<
wa ~a.. ~
.
2
~ t-
I g
0 0 011
I ö
I")
l<
('of
I UJ
z
:J
UJ
C)
0
tAl
0
~
I z
<
~ (/)
CD
a:::
:J
t- U
CI)
I CI) 0
a:: Q. t-
~I 0 ::J
~l i 0
I
¡ a:: I-
~ 0 0 0 3
1 ¡-l (/)
GJ
w
a:::
t-
I ö .... (/)
.... ....z
Õ OW Z
~
w ~~ 0
(,)U 0<
z< wa.
~z Z
~~ 0
Ie tAla 3
-.J
~
(/)
~
1 a..
~f~ :2
:J
«. t; ~ I
a.. 61g
I 0
a:: ~ <{
0
a:::
w
I >
1 0 ( ~
<{
z
a:::
w
I-
--I
<{
1
1
I
I 0 01
I-
0
L
« Ï
1- a.
t
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - JULY 12, 1993 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting to order July 12, 1993 at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Tommy Brown
Lyle E. Welch
Mack Garvin
Mark Wood
Jo Ann Johnson
Ray Oujesky
Byron Sibbet
Linda Spurlock
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Randy Shiflet
Patricia Hutson
Rex McEntire
Greg Dickens
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Assistant City Secretary
Attorney
City Engineer
Absent:
C.A. Sanford
Jeanette Rewis
Deputy City Manager
City Secretary
2.
INVOCATION
Councilman Welch gave the invocation.
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JUNE 28, 1993
APPROVED
Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Welch, to approve the
minutes of the June 28, 1993 meeting.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
!I
I
I
Ie
I
I
July 12, 1993
Page 2
Motion carried 7-0.
5.
PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
No action necessary.
6.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
None.
7.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, & 24)
APPROVED
Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Welch, to approve the
Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 7-0.
8.
PZ 93-10 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF A.L. NELSON TO REZONE
TRACT lAID 1, J. CONDRA SURVEY, ABSTRACT 310
FROM AG AGRICULTURE TO R-I-S SPECIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
(LOCATED AT 7936 DOUGLAS LANE) -
ORDINANCE NO. 1903
APPROVED
Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor
to please come forward.
Mr. Steve Smith, representing the applicant, appeared before the Council. Mr. Smith
advised he was present to answer any questions.
Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing.
Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No.
1903.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
July 12, 1993
Page 3
Motion carried 7-0.
*9.
GN 93-87 ADOPTION OF FAMILY AQUATIC
PARK ENTERPRISE PLAN
(POSTPONED AT THE JUNE 28TH COUNCIL MEETING)
APPROVED
*10.
GN 93-88 AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY AQUATIC PARK ENTERPRISE PLAN
(POSTPONED AT THE JUNE 28TH COUNCIL MEETING)
APPROVED
*11.
GN 93-90 RATIFICATION OF TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
BUREAU OF VITAL STATISTICS CONTRACT,
REMOTE CERTIFICATE PRINTING-
RESOLUTION NO. 93-31
APPROVED
*12.
GN 93-91 VITAL STATISTIC FEES -
ORDINANCE NO. 1900
APPROVED
*13.
GN 93-92 LIBRARY RULES -
ORDINANCE NO. 1899
APPROVED
*14.
GN 93-93 RESCIND RESOLUTION NO. 93-30 WHICH AUTHORIZED
THE SUBMIITAL OF APPLICATION FOR A GRANT
FOR GREEN VALLEY PARK
APPROVED
*15.
GN 93-94 AUTHORIZING THE SUBMI'ITAL FOR A
TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE GRANT -
RESOLUTION NO. 93-32
APPROVED
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
July 12, 1993
Page 4
*16.
GN 93-95 APPROVE BUDGET FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER
IMPACT FEE CONSULTANT
APPROVED
*17.
GN 93-96 WAIVER OF ASSESSMENT FOR DAVIS BOULEVARD
ON TRACT lC, WILLIAM COX SURVEY, ABSTRACT 321
APPROVED
*18.
GN 93-97 REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL OVERTIME FUNDING
FOR PLAN REVIEWS
APPROVED
*19.
PU 93-45 AWARD BID FOR FIRE ENGINE/PUMPER
APPROVED
*20.
PU 93-46 AWARD BID FOR SEWER 1V CAMERA
APPROVED
21.
PW 93-29 PUBLIC HEARING ON BURSEY ROAD
SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENTS
Mr. Greg Dickens, Public Works Director, outlined the scope of the project.
Mr. Jay Searcy, Ferree and Searcy Appraisers, presented the Enhancement Study.
Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to
come forward.
Mr. David Wells, 7508 Bursey Road, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Wells stated the first tract was already on city sewer and he could not see how that
property's value would be enhanced. Mr. Wells stated they felt because of the expense
they would incur connecting to the sewer, they did not see how their property value
would increase. Mr. Wells stated that over the years they had lived with less than ideal
utility and road conditions and had incurred additional expenses from these undesirable
conditions. Mr. Wells asked the Council to waive these expenses because of the expense
it will cost to connect.
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
July 12, 1993
Page 5
Council discussed the tract that was already connected to the sewer.
Mr. Ken Martin, 7416 Bursey Road, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Martin stated he was told he would be included in the project, but he was not listed
on the roll and he would like to be included.
After discussion, Mr. Martin was advised by Staff that there was sewer across the front of
his property and that Staff would coordinate with him if he wanted to connect now or at
a later date.
Mr. Dub Crisp, 7504 Bursey Road, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Crisp asked if the property owner would have a choice in where the stub would be
located.
Mr. Crisp was advised that each property owner would have input on the location of the
stub.
22.
PW 93-30 DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ON BURSEY ROAD _
ORDINANCE NO. 1901
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve Ordinance No.
1901.
Motion carried 7-0.
23.
PW 93-31 CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS
FOR SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ON BURSEY ROAD _
ORDINANCE NO. 1902
APPROVED
Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing.
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No.
1902 levying the assessments to 50% of the preliminary assessment amount.
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
July 12, 1993
Page 6
Mter discussion, Councilman Garvin amended his motion, seconded by Councilman
Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No. 1902, and levy the assessment rate at 50% of the total
project cost.
Motion carried 7-0.
*24.
PW 93-32 RATIFY CHANGE ORDER NO.5 FOR
BURSEY ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
24A.
PW 93-33 AWARD OF BID FOR 1993 CHIP SEAL PROGRAM
APPROVED
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve PW 93-33.
Motion carried 7-0.
25.
CITIZENS PRESENTATION
Ms. Sherry Conaway, 6212 Abbott, appeared before the Council. Ms. Conaway asked
Council if they had received the swim survey she had given to Mr. Browne. Ms.
Conaway asked Council to consider designing the pool so that it could be used by the
swim team.
Council advised Ms. Conaway that her concerns had already been addressed and were
discussed favorably by the Council in the Pre-Council meeting.
l-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
26.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting to Executive Session.
Mter Executive Session, Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting.
July 12, 1993
Page 7
Tommy Brown - Mayor
A TIEST:
Patricia Hutson - Assistant City Secretary
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
MINUTES OF THE BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS,
HELD IN THE PRE-COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL,
7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820,
May 18, 1993, 7:00 P.M.
ATTENDANCE
Present:
Alice Scoma
Patsy Tucker
Billie Sommermeyer
Jane Dunkelberg
Deloris Pultz
Emily Ward
Marilyn with
Chair-person
Vice Chair-person
Commission Member
Commission Member
Commission Member
Commission Member
Commission Member
staff:
Bill Thornton
Christina Lopez
Parks/public Grounds Manager
Secretary
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Ms. Scoma called the meeting to order May 18, 1993 at 7:00 P.M.
2.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
APPROVED
Mrs. Sommermeyer moved, seconded by Ms. Dunkelberg, to approve the
minutes, of the April 20, 1993, Beautification Commission meeting.
Motion carried 7-0.
3.
KEEP TEXAS BEAUTIFUL CONVENTION
APPROVED
Ms. Tucker moved, seconded by Ms. Pultz, that the Beautification
Commission will attend the Keep Texas Beautiful Convention to be held
in Austin Texas on June 28 - July 2nd, 1993. Two representatives will
arrive on Tuesday, June 29, the other four representatives will arrive
on Wednesday June 30, 1993.
Motion carried 7-0
4.
PUBLIC AWARENESS SURVEY
APPROVED
Ms. Dunkelberg moved, seconded by Ms. With, to send a letter to the
respondents of the Public Awareness Survey concerning City ordinances.
Motion carried 7-0
5.
TELEPHONE RE-DIRECTORY RECYCLING EVENT
APPROVED
Ms. Ward moved, seconded by Ms. Pultz, that the Commission will
participate in -the Telephone Re-directory Recycling Event with no
expense to the Commission or City and not to involve to many man-
hours.
Motion carried 6-0
Abstained 1
6.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS REMOVAL DAY
APPROVED
Ms. Pultz moved, seconded by Ms. Tucker, to apply for a Grant with the
Texas Water Commission for a Hazardous Materials Removal Day. The
Grants will be accepted in Septembe~ 1993.
Motion carried 7-0
9.
DISCUSSION OF OTHER ITEMS
The Commission requested that staff inquire about the reporting of
code violations, they would like to know why names, addresses, and
phone numbers are being requested. In the past this has not been
done.
The Commission requested information on the Park and Ride Facility
proposed for Grapevine Highway and Davis Blvd.
The Commission requested that staff check locations of the Community
Proud Signs ~o be sure they have been installed correctly.
12.
ADJOURNMENT
Ms. Scoma adjourned the meeting at 8:28 p.m.
;:;L
Alice Scoma
Chair-person
ATTEST:
O~~~
Christina Lopez
Recording Secretary
Beautification Commission Minutes
Page - 2
May 18, 1993
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Planning and Inspections
. C 'I M ' 0 7/26/93
- ouncl eating ate:
Subject:
Puhlic Hearing to consider revisions to
the Zoning Ordinance No. 1874 regarding
the Masonry Requirement.
Agenda Number:PZ 93-11
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ordinance Number 1906
The Zoning Ordinance for the City requires that all dwellings and permanent structures on
residential lots "...have exterior walls consisting of at least seventy-five percent brick, stone, or
if approved by the City Council, other masonry or materials of equal characteristics. II There is
some question as to the interpretation of this requirement. A house could be constructed with
three walls of 100% brick, and the fourth wall of some other material such as wood.
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this case at their July 8, 1993 meeting, and
recommended the following amendments to this requirement:
1. Require that at least seventy-five percent of the area on each wall elevation be brick,
with the area of openings such as windows excluded.
2. Require that the bricked area extend at least up to the door or window header height of
the first floor.
The attached Ordinance Number 1906 incorporates these changes.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budg t
Other
'í6
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
I
J
." ì '/
,- i1J1 J ,
/( !/\//~
/ '
City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
I
f'
I
I
I
I
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1906
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS, AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1874, THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY, REGARDING THE MASONRY REQUIREMENT; PROVIDING A
SEVERABIUTY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the following recommendation is submitted to the City Council of
the City of North Richland Hills, Texas~ by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a
recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, by
changing the said ordinance as set forth herein.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, Atricla 6, Section 600 A. Masonry Requirement for Certain Residential Buildings, Paragraph 1, be hereby
amended to read as follows:
1. The exterior wall surface, as viewed from each primary elevation, of all permanent structures constructed in the R-1 ,
Ie R-1-S, R-2, R-3, R-4-D, R-6-T, R-7-MF, and R-a zoning Districts shaU consist of at least seventy-five percent brick, stone,
or if approved by the City Council, other masonry or materials of equal characteristics. For the purposes of this
requirement, the exterior wall surface shall be defined as the area between the wall corners extending from the top of the
foundation up to the door or window header height of the first floor, whichever is greater. The area of door and window
openings shall not be included in the calculation of this requirement.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or
section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of
competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses,
sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council
without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or
section.
3.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in fulJ force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance.
4.
,. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage.
I
I'
I
I
I
I
1
1
- (), /7 ~ ~
f''--V· '7 '~:~~~1/1 /~f'(1 ¿~, /,_ - c·~ "} ,
/ v ~. t --
Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission
~ ¿'/.~~ -
.. 1 ¡
Chairman, Pla ,ning alfdZóni"~~ Commission
io I
~
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 26th DAY OF JULY, 1993.
Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas
ATTEST =
.... City Secretary
__ City of North Richland Hills, Texas
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
Ordinance No. 1906
Page 2
I
I
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
~I
I
I
f'
I
PZ Minutes - Page 6
Ju'y 8, 1993
Mr. Baxter stated he is working as a consuttant
in a professional capacity. He stated Mr. LeB n told him rt is legal for
him to vote if necessary. but he would like t bstain unless there is a
stalemate.
Mr. Wilson stated he always had a h time envisioning Holiday Lane
as an M4U all the way to the LOOR e stated his opinion is to eliminate
Holiday Lane from running thro the park.
Mr. Lueck stated during th anning process. they were not concerned
with those houses that w e not going to be built. but were concerned
with taking traffic off 0 ute Snow Drive. He stated the absence of the
houses is a wash b use of the necessity for the road. He stated he
cannot vote to re ve this road from the Plan without being convinced
that the traffic . ation in that area will improve.
Mr. Barfie de the motion to deny PS 93-21. thereby leaving Holiday
Lane on e Master Thoroughfare Plan between Starnes Road and
Burse oad. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck, and the motion
carr 3-2. with Mr. Barfield, Mr. Lueck, and Chairman Brock voting for
dial. and Mr. Wilson and Mr. Baxter voting against denial.
ZONING CASES
4. PZ 93-11
Public Hearing to consider an Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No.
1874 regarding the Masonry Requirement.
Mr. LeBaron stated the present regulations require that a residential
structure be at least 750/0 brick. He stated the proposed regutation would
require each wall to be at least 75% brick. He stated this would be
consistent with the commercial requirements.
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and caJled for those wishing
to speak to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak.
Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Barfield stated brick should extend to the door or window header
height of the first floor rather than the nine feet stated. He stated they
should leave in the requirement that alternate materiats be approved by
the City Council.
Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve Pl 93-11 as discussed. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck.
Mr. Lueck asked if those changes would be too much to the staff to
handle every time a plan is reviewed.
Mr. LeBaron stated the change would make it easier to calculate the
requirement.
The motion carried 5-0.
I CITY OF
I NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I_Department: Planning and Inspections
Subject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.11t
I
>1
;1
I
i·1
I
.1..' s~~~~es ~~~~~~:.~
'. _ Operating Budget
I Othe
I
PlJhli~ HA~rino to ~nn~idAr thA request of
Wes Bannister to rezone Tracts 3A 1 and 3A 1 B,
Eden Survey, Abstract 499, from their present zoning
classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family
Residential. This property is located on the west side
of Eden Road, north of Ashcraft Drive.
Council Meeting Date: 7/26/93
Agenda Number: PZ 93-12
Ordinance Number 1907
Mr. Wes Bannister is the owner of a five acre tract of land located on Eden Road, just north of
Ashcraft Drive. The property is currently zoned AG Agriculture, and Mr. Bannister would like
to develop the tract to accommodate a development of single family homes. Mr. Bannister is
requesting a zoning change to R-2 Single Family Residential to allow the development.
The R-2 zoning district requires a minimum lot size of 9,000 square feet and a minimum
dwelling unit size of 1 ,800 square feet. The district also requires a minimum lot width of 70
feet and a minimum lot depth of 110 feet. These requirements are being incorporated in a
preliminary plat of the property that is currently under review by the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
The Land Use Master Plan for the City calls for low density single family development in this
area. This request is consistent with the Plan.
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at their July 8, 1993 meeting
and recommended approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
ent Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
f¿ IJV~
City Manager
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1907
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 2, SECTION 200, OF ZONING ORDINANCE
NUMBER 1874, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 22, 1993; PROVIDING A
SEVERABIUTY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, after appropriate notice and public hearing, the following recommendation is submitted to the City
Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has forwarded a
recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1874 and the Official Zoning Map by
rezoning certain property; now therefore
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, on Case Number PZ 93-12, the following properties shall be rezoned from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single
Family Residential:
BEING all of that certain tract of land situated in the J.B. Eden Survey, Abstract No. 499, Tarrant County,
Texas, as described by deed to Wesley D. Bannister and wife, Ellen F. OIDaniet as recorded in Volume
10,909, Page 1554 of the Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by
metes and bounds as follows:
COMMENCING at the northeast comer of lot 35, Block 7, Stonybrooke Addition, an addition to the City of
North Richland Hills, Tanant County, Texas, as recorded in Plat Volume 388-87, Pages 5 and 6, Plat
Records, Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE, North 00 degrees 13 minutes 55 seconds East, 27.42 feet with the west line of said
Bannister/O'Oaniel tract to a 3I8-inch iron rod found for the northwest comer of said Bannister/OIDarnel tract
and the POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE, South 89 degrees 56 minutes 20 seconds East (South 89 degrees 55 minutes 04 seconds East
deed) with the north line of said BannisterlO'Danief tract and the south line of Tract 1 as described by deed to
T.S. Bradford, et we and recorded in Volume 8989, Page 145 of said deed records, at 162.86 feet pass a one-
inch iron pipe found for the common north corner of Tracts 1 and 2 as described in said Bannister/OIDaniel
deed, at 214.12 feet pass a 3I8-inch iron rod found for a common comer of said Bradford tract and a tract of
land described by deed to D.T. Boswell, et us as recorded in Volume 9954, Page 125 of said deed records
continuing with the north line of said Bannister/O'Daniel tract the south line of said Boswell tract, in all, a total
distance of 499.97 feet (497.44 feet deed) to a 1/2-inch iron rod found;
THENCE, South 01 degrees 01 minutes 38 seconds West, 152.56 feet (South 00 degrees 53 minutes 00
seconds West, 152.71 feet deed) with an easterly line of said Bannister/O'Daniel tract and the west line of a
tract of land described by deed to J.C. Gebo, at ux as recorded in Volume 9297, Page 2048 of said deed
records to a 1/2-inch iron rod found;
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
THENCE, North 89 degrees 46 minutes 00 seconds East (North 89 degrees 39 minutes 03 seconds East
deed) with a common line of said Bannister/O'Daniel tract and said Gebo tract at 376.42 feet pass a 1/2-inch
iron rod found continuing, in all, a distance of 376.66 feet to a point tor corner from which a SIB-inch iron rod
found bears North 00 degrees 53 minutes 46 seconds East, 150.62 feet;
THENCE, South 00 degrees 53 minutes 46 seconds West, 113.32 teet (South 00 degrees 53 minutes 00
seconds West, 114.09 teet deed) with the east line at said Bannister/O'Daniel tract and the existing west
right-ot-way line of Eden Road to a 1/2-inch iron rod found;
THENCE, South 89 degrees 47 minutes 22 seconds West with a common line at said Bannister/O'Daniel
tract and a tract of land described by deed to M.D. Suffolk and recorded in Volume 10471, Page 1307 of said
deed records at 709.52 teet pass a one-inch iron pipe found for the common south corner of Tracts 1 and 2 in
said Bannister/O'Daniel deed continuing, in all, a distance of 871.04 feet (870.87 feet deed) to a 3/8-inch iron
rod found in the east line of Lot 6, Block 7 of Stonybrooke Addition, and addition to the City of North Richland
Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-159, Page 77 of said Plat Records;
THENCE, North 00 degrees 13 minutes 55 seconds West, 268.05 feet (North 00 degrees 11 minutes 18
seconds East, 267.55 feet deed) with the west line at said Bannister/O'Daniel tract to the POINT OF
BEGINNING and containing 4.024 acres at land, more or less.
The bearings recited in this description are based on the south line of the two tracts of land described in
Volume 10909, Page 1554 of the Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas.
This property is located on the west side at Eden Road, north of Ashcraft Drive.
2.
THAT, the Official Zoning Map be redrawn to incorporate this zoning district boundary amendment and the herein
described ordinance number be affixed to the property described herein.
3.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention ot the City Councit that the section,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid
judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any
of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would
have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance ot any such invalid or
unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
4.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance Number 1874, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full torce and effect, save and except as amended by this
ordinance.
Ordinance No. 1907
Page 2
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
5.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF JULY, 1993.
»tYv11l ¿£¡~&~
Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission
Chairman, I
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 26th DAY OF JULY, 1993.
Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
Ordinance No. 1907
Page 3
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes - Page 7
July 8, 1993
5. PZ 93-12
STAFF REPORT
CITIZEN COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
David Barfield, Vice-Chairman
Planning and Zoning Commission
Public Hearing to consider the request of Wes Bannister to rezone
Tracts 3A 1 and 3A 1 B, Eden Survey, Abstract 499, from their present
zoning classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential.
This property is located on the west side of Eden Road. between
Evergtade Drive and Ashcraft Drive.
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak to come forward.
Mr. Darryl Perry, with Washington and Associates, came forward to
represent the owner. He stated Mr. Bannister will be platting the
property to construct his home.
Chairman Brock stated they are only looking at the zoning of the
property tonight.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Brock closed the
Public Hearing.
Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve PZ 93-12. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Barfield, and the motion carried 5-0.
LeBaron reminded the Commission of thë training workshop being
put ether by the American Planning Association that will be held at
the Bfi ide Convention Center in Hurst on July 19, 1993. He asked if
any mem was interested in attending, let him or Mr. Husband know
and they wil you signed up. He stated it will start around 6:30 p.m.
and run to 10: m. He stated it includes a barbecue dinner. Mr.
LeBaron stated t will include planning, zoning, subdivision
regulations, board of 'ustment activities, and public meeting
procedures and require s.
Mr. LeBaron stated there is a y of the draft landscaping regulations
included in the packet. He stat he Commission discussed this item at
a previous workshop. He stated t would like to schedule another
workshop for discussion on this item.
None.
There being no further business, the meeting was
James BrocK,
Planning and Zoning Co
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
FACT SHEET
CASE NO. PZ 93-12
Hearing Dates:
PZ 7/8/93
CC 7/26/93
REQUEST: AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential
APPLICANT: Wes Bannister
PROPERTY OWNER: Wes Bannister
SIZE AND LOCATION: 4.024 acres located on the west side of Eden Road, between
Everglade Drive and Ashcraft Drive
SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Generally flat terrain. Vegetation consists mostly of grass and
small shrubs, with a good number of large trees. A metal shed
exists on the property.
PROPOSED USE: Single family homes
ALLOWED USE: Same
ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES
North AG: existing single family home and acreage
South AG: existing single family home and acreage
East R-2: existing single family homes (Eden Addition)
West R-2: existing single family homes (Stonybrooke Addition)
DRAINAGE FEMA maps show that this property does not lie within either the 1 DO-year or
SOD-year flood plain.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN Access to this property is from Eden Road and Brookridge Drive.
Eden Road is classified as a C4U thoroughfare (Major Collector, 4-lane, undivided roadway).
Brookridge Drive is classified as an R2U thoroughfare (Residential, 2-lane, undivided
roadway).
LAND USE MASTER PLAN The Land Use Master Plan calls for low density single family
development in this area. The request is consistent with the Plan.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
ZONING HISTORY
This property was initially zoned AG Agriculture when the City was incorporated in 1953. This
is the first zoning change request on this property.
The property to the west (Stonybrooke Addition) was rezoned from Agriculture to 1 F-9, a
single family district, in 1973.
The property to the east (Eden Addition) was rezoned from Agriculture to R-2 in 1983.
PLATTING HISTORY
This property is currently unplatted. A Preliminary Plat is under review by Staff and will be
considered by the Commission at a future date.
~. I..J I I
:tJ \
I, I ....
~..... .....
ÂJJ C1
"'--J
~
~
! ....
.....
"-I 0
..... f\.)
rù f\.) to
..... :D
W CD
I ....
f\) ..... .....
~ :D
A lD
~
f\) 0
1 0 :D
r\) tD
I ! U1
. '..J
~ »
c;
~ A- .... f\)
f\) U1
lC
148.J .....
..... c..n
:IJ ! "'--J
:
I w ~ . »
CD CJ
.....
» r\)
I iJO.I
.....
I- I r\)
A-..... CD
:...
O:D ::Þ
1\)..... -t r:
»A-
(jCD ~:D :D
U\..... ! ,.
! ! c.cw w
,~ . »::Þ CD
.. .. nW ....
w I\) f\)
C;m » ~ -f .....
I 0 JJ ! 0 ::0 !
.. w :...
I .. > w » 0
I + n C;
!
152 .....-f ¡ .....
. IJ i ! -f
.À I ì
Ww 0l I i U1::O
I ~» ¡ I . }>.....
(ã)..... i I ('j
-f » ,
! JJ I
0
A- I
I » CD
C1 .....
I
148.J IS2 UO.D ,50 dl.1 iJI . . dl.' UI.I
UI 10 &08.1
f\.) .....
0 W ..... :D
..... ..... r\) JJ
(J) ~ m w
..... f\) < » -f
r\) tD m at :D
:IJ U1 w
G) e
..... w r . » »
.... .. .....
w a> m » C; »
» 0
Cf) CD m
..... A '-J
A ~ '..J ::I: ~ 0
» ("') (J1 JJ
JJ JJ
-I ..... U1 »
U1 H 01 I " ~
-I ~
lD b
r ..... I 0
m Z U1 I\) 0'1 JJ
..... ~ ~
..... r\) W
'..J ~ '..J
..... \ U1 CIR W
CD en HIALEAH
( MATCH L/\E - 5££ PACE D;l
"".
',......
1 ..'
............:. ..,,"-_·······Î
I . I .....~.....~..._..........¡ ~ ......~.....
c. '; r':··.~:::;:..:.:...·; ô- nn ..nr . nn...n 1 :; Innnnn
. ,,[. k L.......nin.nnn I~! _
'3",;, '. ..,>..~.':~ \.:.... :",::::~:::·:::I:':~:,:,¿1~¡~:_~.::..R.;i·3 ~ W !.,..,...,.
~.: 1 ~ ~-_
R-3-1800 ~
.-5",::
"'C)._
.-:.:'0:".
......j .....+.J.
. ,
i I
--~\Tf1'
~_.; ~
~ ~...........
'p I~¡
.............. ~ ~......·--2··
: I"\.J '
~
.............~ ~.
19
.. ............. ----.......... ........................
I 4['
'p
R-3-2000
¡ A~,:"
I"',' 33
"
".
34
35
I
.36 ¡
-'
HILLCREST
.:: :'C 7
AG
::.' r..: : ~,
~..... ........... ....... i
.". .
I]"'~:'''';'''': ,:u .":': n.: n n;.: u.
RO}"AL
RfDGE_
: : : ! :
_ _ .' S' P;R !: IV C H / ~..~:....J....:.....:,~:.....L..:3-L.......t......L..:.............._
I. u:·. ,..,: ..uL'h' .L~.:.J.....'.:... ~ :.',',=::::::: R - 2" ~~' ,': ' ' · ';" "--'''h..
I· .;~ 0 'J }', J R '; ~ hL·~;:..::L. :~: :,:~?~..- ,,~~,:,,:,':,'.'.' ,':1 ~'" " : _ " "': ~ i
')~; ¡ '0 i 9 / ," .=~ ~ ~ ~-' ~"., .:'" .'/ '. : ~. ./f r.".. ] '> ": SJ 0 NEe Pi 4,s,¥,' R..h.."'..hU.......;.~.~~.1............h............
I/:~··<~±~;~:··J.:····( t.~..~.~::;(.~> -:;Ô~!~·.. ~~ ç·~:::~":··I~~~~:~::i ~ ::::,'.'i.". f· ,( ~.,~+~ ]
ç P R / \' C B ROD K : '; ··..~5·· .' '! ¡''\:~ ..... :..---......: ~ t 6- TR 38::-
u...,;. , .. ........ _: .' :.' 'J;. ;:; f><~':\;" ,..'-' :. i . . . ,1--" :..... ~ . u ....'u.. .....: ~ u;;:..;.. u, _,__... _ _.;;' u ;~,u......u u... u _ _ .."
JP : ; ~ 1 ~ ~ .........._____........^.., ~ .....................;.................................."_~,,,...............................
I . ., ,'..: ':- ~.._..........
...........:;; ~-- . · ""; '\' 'l--- '''',-,
a -----~ :: ~ 1" R I [) (, L
_...:,-: ~m_~~; --~~:--.. :
f~ .; . _ _ ~ . -' :- ~.
:............... ...... ..;·....···........·......·1
~ a... .......... ................ .......................................................
TP 1
iR 30
T ¡; .'f
I
TP ~A:':'
- ~ .
. -
3:'
, .
I
< ::
a....~
! g ~ I!' /
. . . .
~ :;; ~ ,.;; i 1 Ú¡;! ~ : '"
11
i; j,:..:
:,p
(' R E ~ TI' f EI1', r,: . '~7, ............... _, u,.. ,....., u.. ..._.. ~ ~~~.. ..._..' uu.......... u __.. ......
: \.. -~...................--...............
~...-...:.... ~ ..:.... .-,.. ........ ......... .---.. ............. .--..................
1',qWE
~;; J ~- .
:'6 !
1 "
~-
~.. ... .. ... ........ .. ... ........... ...... .
-".::'.'.'J
I., :
~.... 1 ~.....:.,~... ..·..··.....1
= ~ - .....g....j
I ~ .~,.." ", -'....... ...,.:....:
~A WE X..'
AG
............. ....... ............................. ........ ............... .................-- ................
¡ J:' ~
.......... .......-... ......
T¡:; 4:
R-3-1600
1328
..-............................................. ...-.............................. ..........-.................................. -....-....... .........................
¡ I
I· ...;0
...... .......h..........···
..~
~I
'\ , :
Ì'Q..... .
......__.:...-9..;.--
R...2-1800
1304
I~ PZ 33- 12.
North Richl~nd Hills
~ Star of lb. ".uopl..
( MATCH L/\£ - SEE PACE D5 )
AG
!\ I H 1\
. .
.__......_.._-_..................~. ...... .... ..........
...... ..........
I tA=
· .
· .
· .
· .
I- .......... ......._......__~..... .... ...... ..................-:
· .
. .. .... .... ...... .. .. .. .. ...... "" .... .. .................................. .. .. .. .. ...... .... .. ...... .. .... .. . .. .. .. . .. ..
... ........... .............................. ............... ............... "......... ............... ... ....
2...,
~
, .
I............. ......_....... ..........
~~
......,JI
! :~ .3 A I.:.
I'~-';" ;.;:....... ---................-
! ~L.............~
......... ~I :....
r..··..··..! ~ i'-'/~sÞ
, ¡:;:'.~:::...)
PD-t·
1 P ! y.~}r-··~':· \~J
. . .
,,11-2: . ~':'S~\
-1.30 ~
, -
~---....R.~ 11 r i
I... ...._........~
If
~-'
.'':' .
····/....i:.f
.... F-r:-
......;
=.:~:,:,.~ t'··..··~]··:::··:~'·.._~ ~~";:- ':'~'.~.:::.;
. j11~4
~ ~:" ..;.;. L,::' ". .:~. ,.,~:'" ",:'" ':'~-"'~"'~", ::-..:.:.. .
. : :
""..
.....:
.H.4 R T I
-4
~ : j ,,:.
J,.j SOX c [.~,~\~?,~:~m¡~'o) \'
.' ).:.~:...i.+.....:.L.....:._._.. t'
AG"h::'.:.:~,· ; ~> ~«
March 22, ,(
~~
j I
I "I
____ r rTi
~1-.-1 J ~
C2l
11..11
-~-~
I~
I I
.
I I~~
-~/t j ~;
r--- .~~
J-C2-
I
I~
I (j-I
,
I
. ..
~
-
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
PRESENT ZONING:
AG Agricultural District
CHANGE TO:
R-2 Single-family District
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
See attached
NEW OWNER: NAME Wes Bannister, et ux Ellen F. PHONE 817/498-2056
O'Dan~el
ADDRESS 749 Aspen Court, Hurst, Texas 76054
APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR A LETTER FROM THE OWNER GIVING HIM
PERMISSION TO REQUEST THIS ZONING CHANGE.
Limestone Trust by James B. Morgan, Trustee
PREVIOUS OWNER: NAME Sidney A. Parker and wife, Elaine PHONE
G. Parker
ADDRESS
DEVELOPER:
Wes Bannister
PHONE 817/498-2056
NAME
ADDRESS 749 Aspen Court, Hurst, Texas 76054
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: NAME Washington & Associates, Inc.
PHONE 817/485-0707
ADDRESS 500 Grapevine Hwy., Suite 375, Hurst, Texas 76q~4
REASON FOR ZONING
CHANGE Subdivide into three residential lots.
PROPOSED USE R-2 Single-family Residential
ZONING FEE: .$300.00
COPIES REQUIRED 33 copies of plat or survey
FILING DEADLINE 15th of each month to be heard following month
Si!~~ A~~~ut
b I2-ß/ 93.
Da te { /
P2. 13- (2-
, -, .
I"
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning and Inspections
'ubject:
I
_ Council Meeting Date: 7/26/93
Pllhli~ HA~rino to ~on~irl~r rAvisions to
the Master Thoroughfare Plan regarding Douglas Lane.
Agenda Number:PS 93-20
Ordinance Number 1904
The future alignment of Douglas Lane on the Master Thoroughfare Plan, between Starnes
Road and Bursey Road, is currently proposed as a straight north-south C-2-U collector street.
There is some concern, however, that this alignment would have a detrimental effect on the
proposed city·park to be located in the area.
The City recently purchased approximately 100 acres of land in this 'area for a city park. This
land is generally located east of Douglas Lane, west of the Kingswood Estates subdivision,
north of Starnes Road, and south of the Londonderry subdivision.
The currently proposed alignment of Douglas Lane bisects the park into two parts (see
attached exhibit). It would also require that pedestrians cross a majqr thoroughfare in order to
move between parks. The proposed alignment would also consume approximately two acres
of park land for street right-of-way.
The Parks and Recreation Board met on May 6, 1993, and unanimously recommended that
the Planning and Zoning Commission consider amending the alignment of Douglas Lane to
follow its current physical alignment' located to the west of the proposed alignment shown on
the Master Thoroughfare Plan. An attached memo from the Parks Department details their
recommendation. Also attached is a map showing the current alignment of Douglas Lane and
the recommended realigned location..
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this case at their July 8, 1993 meeting, and
recommended to realign Douglas Lane to follow its current physical alignment.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and consider the
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
~ .
~ Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
. _Operating Budget
Oth
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
¡( 1~/~
Dep rtment Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I'
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
Ordinance No. 1904
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS, AMENDING THE MASTER
THOROUGHFARE PLAN OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS, TO MAKE REVISIONS
REGARDING DOUGLAS LANE; PROVIDING A SEVERABIUTY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills has forwarded a
recommendation to the City Council for amendment of the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a Public Hearing to consider said revisions, and after hearing,
determines that such revisions shall be adopted.
NOW, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH lAND HillS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, Douglas Lane, a future C2U Minor Collector thoroughfare, be relocated on the Master Thoroughfare Plan
from its existing alignment as a straight north-south roadway between Starnes Road and Bursey Road to an
alignment, as shown in attached Exhibit A, which follows its current physical location from its intersection with
Starnes Road to its intersection with Bursey Road.
2.
SEVERABiliTY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and it any phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid
judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any
of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would
have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or
unconstitutiona~ phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
3.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended,
shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance; and that the Master
Thoroughfare Plan shall hereafter reflect these revisions.
I"
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
:1
4.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF JULY, 1993.
:./ j..< -~l
~a
;1' ._.; "-
.:,' .~:. .J: .~ '\
~(¡~yV
Chairman, P
Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 26th DAY OF JULY, 1993.
ATTEST:
Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
Ordinance No. 1904
Page 2
I
I
Ie
I
I
I /
J-
I ---.
------
~--
-
l --.,
EXHIBI. A
O~Þr~^NGE 1904
i=
==trDa' aa
D
Þ
~
o
~
n
---
'~, D'I! ~ ~~LU
~ R I ~L..ANB I L r
l----/ ~~ S
!_ - ~ ¡ ~ -i-- ---.t
:~~_/~tt~~
r---'~ t:::: ~ ~ ~
\ : I~--~
\, -~_-r
.--.. ' - ~ ___ -J.
" ~.____-i--. ~' '---L-J_
,,\ ---'--
~ \ \..---1 ~ _
~_ ~=f1=t
IW ~ --r- -.J-
ii , SR=::: ;H
¡ ; Hd: ' --}
~~, ':~~--:iJ: ¡ Ie:
I~ j ~
;;'---1 I I I -or
r-1 ; ; !
~ ¡: I
--1 ; . i
i i .1 I ¡ I ¡ t.; ; I' !; I ,
~ r-r- I I"'~
c:: :=:::! 'I '/ I I
- - ¡ '--L.Ì£~'
~~~ ¿~
- ~ ± ../-^/'
~ --+- --+-1 /' .
CI I '±1~
,"- ~ :=m ::¡:
- --+--; ::t: :I
~ ;::r&![: --+- --....-
@:tFf
~LL1' : iCE
/
~I
tj/
y ',,-- -----..:
'- J"'~""T
~~
L~. ~""!f
~~.
'~'~:m¡~
~_ j '.' ! rl .. ~.
~~ I---i~
r---+--.---J ¡----!~
~, ---.,~
~ :=J @....._-.
~::J
~ :=8
~EP ~
~~ ~~
:i.Ç;./~
, J....., /
t£
I:-~ -
~~h~..,-'
-;~~/~
~ r-i~, ~_.-
lç~ ~ =-:
.......--1 .....- -
..l.--' ~- _.
~--1 ~ ~.
=h~~
~-...~~
~_.,
~.~~
--..----
I !
II CITY
~t::J
NE:.W AL.\~~ ~
bo~ LANE
~!-
,.
'-----!
¡~
,
~
I! "
--+-
I'
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
OF JUNE 28. 1993
PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS
1. PS 93-16
2. PS 93-20
MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS. TEXAS
July 8, 1993 - 7:30 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman James Brock at 7:30 p.m.
PRESENT
Chairman
Members
James Brock
David Barfield
Ron Lueck
Victor Baxter
Fred Wilson
Barry LeBaron
Clayton Husband
Don Bowen
Paul Miller
Wayne Moody
Dir of Plan/tnsp
PZ Coordinator
ABSENT
Mr. Barfield made the motion to appr e the minutes as written. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Wilso and the motion carried 3-0, with
Mr. Baxter and Chairman Brock aining due to absence at the
previous meeting.
Request of General Mills aurants for Preliminary Plat of Lot 1, Block
E, Calloway Farm Adcf' . This property is located at the southwest
corner of Grapevine . way and the entrance to North Hills Mall.
Mr. Bob Pruitt, of
Expressway, D
the applicant
ymond L. Goodson, Inc., 10440 N Central
, came forward to represent the applicant He stated
agreed to all engineering comments.
stated this is a Preliminary Plat, and the Commission will
I Plat in the near future.
eck made the motion to approve PS 93-16 subject to engineerJs
ents. The motion was seconded by Mr. Baxter, and the motion
'ed 5-0.
Public Hearing to consider revisions to the Master Thoroughfare Plan
regarding Douglas Lane.
Mr. LeBaron stated the Parks and Recreation Board is recommending
that the Commission consider realigning Dougtas Lane from its proposed
alignment through the new park. He stated the Parks Board
recommended that Douglas Lane follow its existing alignment and
remain as a C2U roadway. Mr. LeBaron presented a map showing the
alignment according to the Master Thoroughfare Plan, and the proposed
changed alignment.
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak to come forward at this time.
I'
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
PZ Minutes - Page 2
July 8. 1993
Mr. Glenn Nerwin, 7724 Aubrey Lane, came forward to speak. He
stated he is working on a bio-inventory of the park to enable the parks
department to plan accordingly. He presented a map representing the
area. Mr. Nerwin stated they are documenting the wildlife, plant life, and
soil types. He stated his support for the request.
Mr. Don Presley, 7413 Douglas Lane, came forward to speak. He asked
if the change would result in Douglas Lane being curbed and guttered.
Mr. LeBaron stated it would be built out as a two lane thoroughfare.
Ms. Cheryl Lyman, 7828 Tipperary Court, came forward to speak. She
stated she is representing Adventure World and the Londonderry Home
Owners Association. She stated her recommendation was to leave
Douglas Lane on its existing alignment and remove Holiday Lane
altogether. She stated Smithfield Road already intersects North Tarrant
Parkway. She stated money has already been allocated for SmithfieJd
Road.
Mr. Lueck asked where money for Smithfield Road was allocated from.
Ms. Lyman stated the City would be widening Smithfield Road next to
the soccer complex near Green Valley Elementary.
Mr. Jim Browne, Community Services Director for the City, came forward
to speak. He stated the park site is about 1 00 acres. He stated they are
in the conceptual planning stage for this park. He stated they do not
want thoroughfares to bisect the park site since it reduces the
development capability of the park. Mr. Browne stated he felt parks are
for people, not for cars. He stated they want to promote hike and bike
trails in the park. He stated the development of the park will reduce the
future population growth of the area. He stated Holiday Lane should be
deleted from the Plan.
Mr. Wilson asked how much land would Holiday Lane take up, and what
streets would serve the parking areas for the park.
Mr. Browne stated Holiday Lane would remove 2.4 acres of land from
the park site. He stated the alignment of the roads would dictate the
location of the parking areas. He stated they have not decided what
facilities would be available in the park.
Mr. Wilson asked which roads would serve the parking areas to the park.
Mr. Browne stated Douglas Lane and Starnes Road. He stated they
would promote pedestrian access from the neighborhoods.
Mr. Barfield asked which part of the park was the most important. He
asked what the impact would be if Holiday Lane were curved over to the
west to tie into Douglas Lane.
Mr. Browne stated it would still bisect the park. He stated he is not sure
of the impact that would have.
Mr. Lueck asked how Mr. LeBaron came up with the alignment of
Holiday Lane as shown on the map.
I"
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
IIÞ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
PZ Minutes - Page 3
July 8, 1993
Mr. LeBaron stated he extended a straight line to show an approximate
alignment. not an exact one.
Mr. Jim Mace, 7605 Aubrey Lane, came forward to speak. He stated the
area shown for Holiday Lane is an environmentally sensitive area. He
stated his support for realigning Douglas Lane.
Mr. Ken Hudnall, 7525 Cimmaron, came forward to speak. He asked if
Douglas Lane goes straight through the park, would the rest of Douglas
Lane be widened at a later date.
Mr. LeBaron stated it would be built out as a residential street. He stated
it would be 31 feet of pavement.
Ms. Marilyn Jones, 7309 Dustin Court, came forward to speak. She
asked how many feet would be added to the road if it were widened.
Mr. LeBaron stated when property is platted, the necessary right-at-way
is obtained at that time.
Mr. Cecil Lyles, 6888 Moss Lane, came forward to speak. He asked
what which roads would be the access roads to the park. He stated
Moss Lane is heavily traveled.
Chairman Brock stated the major travel routes to the park would
probably be Starnes Road and Bursey Road. He stated public hearings
on the park will be held when the plans are finalized.
Mr. Ted Kuzmerski, 7417 Douglas Lane, came forward to speak. He
stated his support for the request.
There being no one else wishing to speak. Chairman Brock closed the
Public Hearing.
Mr. Barfield stated the Commission has looked at this property many
times, and studied it intently when writing the master plan. He stated the
studies show that there is a serious need for an M4U type of roadway in
this area to serve people going north to North Tarrant Parkway. He
stated most people will avoid Rute Snow Drive because of the traffic.
Mr. Barfield stated they could go through the east side of the park, but
traffic must get to Bursey Road and further north. He stated they need
to allow for traffic flow north and south. He stated there are only two
exits off the Loop to go north.
Mr. Wilson made the motion to approve PS 93-21 as presented. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Baxter.
Mr. Lueck stated they must move traffic through the area. He asked if
by approving this case, are they limiting Douglas Lane to only two lanes
in the future.
Chairman Brock stated they could always recommend to upgrade the
street.
The motion carried 3-2, with Chairman Brock. Mr. Wilson, and Mr. Baxter
voting for the request. and Mr. Barfield and Mr. Lueck voting against the
I"
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.
I
PZ Minutes - Page 4
July 8, 1993
request.
3. PS 93-21
blic Hearing to consider revisions to the Master Thoroughfare Plan
rding Holiday Lane.
an Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing
to come forward at this time.
rock stated the Master Thoroughfare Plan map was posted
·n board for viewing. He stated this request would eliminate
Holiday Lane north of Starnes Road from the Plan.
7413 Douglas Lane, came forward to speak. He asked
was classified as south of Starnes.
Mr. LeBaron stat
C2U.
is an M4U roadway, which is a bigger street than a
Chairman Brock stat anyone wants a copy of the Master
Thoroughfare Plan map, ey should see Mr. LeBaron at City Hall and he
will provide you wnh a co
Mr. Barfield stated if they do t allow for a larger street in this area, they
are making a big mistake.
Mr. Lueck stated they need to k w whether Rute Snow Drive and
Smithfield Road can carry the a nt of traffic to the north. He stated
he is concerned about putting a ~ y through an environmentally
sensitive area, but they need some y to move traffic through the area.
Chairman Brock stated that Holiday L should not go through the
park. He stated Holiday Lane could be e far east boundary of the park.
Mr. Lueck stated Douglas Lane could go
Lane could be eliminated through the park.
shows that they need a street in the area, a
alignment.
C4U roadway, and Holiday
e stated the Plan only
does not show an exact
Ms. Sandra Curtis, 6884 Greenleaf Drive, came rward to speak. She
stated this is a dangerous comer. She stated th need sidewalks on
the road if it is developed. She stated no one wa a four-lane street
next to their house.
Mr. Barfield stated the City Council downgraded HoJi
M4U to a C2U last year.
Mr. LeBaron stated that the cny does not have plans to b
street. He stated they are merely drawing a fine on a map
represents a future plan. He stated that streets are built by
developer of the property, and sidewalks are put in at that tim
LeBaron stated if the city puts in the street via a bond program,
must decide at that time whether to include sidewalks in the bon
election.
Ms. Curtis stated they need a comprehensive program to look at the
items.
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
,.
I
City of
orth Richland Hills
MEMORANDUM
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
May 6, 1993
TO:
Barry LeBaron
Directory of Community Development
Bill Thornton \~~
Parks/public Groundé'~nager
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Douglas Lane - Amendment to the Thoroughfare Plan
RE:
PRM2593
The Parks and Recreation Board, at the May 3, 1993 meeting, voted
unanimously to recommend to the Planning and Zoning Commission
and to the City Council that the thoroughfare plan be amended to
show Douglas Lane in its current physical alignment.
The attached memorandum details the staff's and Parks and
Recreation Board's recommendation.
Please let me know if you need any additional information in
submitting this item to the Planning and Zoning Commission for
their review and consideration.
cc: Jim Browne, Director of Community Services
(817) 581·5500 · P.o. BOX 820809 · NOATH AICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS 71182
I-
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
City of
orth Richland Hills
MEMORANDUM
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
April 29, 1993
TO: Barry LeBaron
Community Development Director
FROM: Bill Thornton~
Parks/Public Grounds Manager
SUBJECT: Pennington Estates Preliminary Plan
RE: PRM1893
The Community Services Department staff has reviewed the preliminary
plat and recommend that Douglas Lane, between Starnes and Bursey
Road, should remain in its existing location.
The 100 acre city Park located south of the proposed Pennington
Estates, as shown on the attached map, was acquired in December,
1992. The current thoroughfare plan shows Douglas Lane as a
collector street to be relocated from its present alignment, with
the new alignment bisecting the 100 acre park resulting in a loss of
development capabilities.
Bisecting the park with a collector street will create two smaller
parcels that must be developed as two distinct parks. Design
elements could not be inter-related since pedestrian traffic cannot
be encouraged to cross a thoroughfare.
Although preliminary concept plans being prepared for development of
the park will not be completed for several months, it is apparent
that the most useable open space for active recreation is the area
where the thoroughfare plan shows relocating Douglas Lane. The
remaining acreage west of the proposed alignment may not be adequate
to support active recreation and still maintain an acceptable buffer
from the residents on the west side of existing Douglas Lane.
Additionally, the re-alignment of Douglas Lane through the park will
result in the taking of approximately two acres of parkland for
right-af-way.
(817) 581-5500 · P.o. BOX 820609 · NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS 78182
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
Page Two
Pennington Estates Preliminary Plan
April 28, 1993
- The current thoroughfare plan was prepared on the Comprehensive Land
Use Plan assumption that the 100 acres of newly acquired parkland
was to be developed as residential property. However, the 100 acres
has now become parkland, subsequently removing the population base
and related collector traffic load.
After thorough evaluation, staff believes that the City Council, and
the Parks and Recreation Board will concur that the most reasonable
and prudent alternative would be to leave Douglas Lane in its
current alignment.
Attachment
I·
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
LJnd~cape Architecture· PIJnning· Englneer¡n~
July 7, 1993
\ ìLtor \ \. GJ\ter. .~)L -\
I\ent E. Bt-)I~\', :\SL,~
o~eph E. Bradlev. PE
Terrv T. Cheek, ASLA
Terry E. Cullender
Dino I. Ferraii¡, PE
Daniel B. Hartman, PE
Mark C. Hatchel. .-\SLA
Santord P. LaHue. Jr., PE
Hershel Lind/v, :\P:\
Albert vV Rollins. PE
Gene Schrickel. FASLA
Larrv D. Stone, PE
Mr. Jim Browne
Director of Community Services
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609
RE: 100 Acre Starnes Tract / City Park
Routing of Future Streets
Dear Mr. Browne:
The routing of the future streets of Douglas Lane and Holiday Lane through the City Park
property will have an extreme impact on the park development. The Master
Thoroughfare Plan shows both streets running through the park north and south between
Starnes and Bursey. If the current alignments are maintained, the park will be divided by
the streets into three separate properties rather than one. The effect is detrimental to the
park environment and limits the options we have in park development. The impact of this
issue is so serious that the planning of the park cannot proceed until it is resolved.
In the best interest of the development of the park property we suggest the following
guidelines in determining the street routes:
1) Keep all nonessential vehicular traffic out of the park. Parks are for people,
not cars.
2) Route all through traffic to the perimeter of the park. This creates a safer
environment and it gives more flexibility in the park development.
3) Create a natural pedestrian oriented atmosphere in the park whenever
possible.
Douglas Lane
In the thoroughfare plan, Douglas Lane is designated as a C2U (60' R.O.W.). Its
alignment as shown would divide the northern portion of the site in half and it would
severely restrict the development of the park. We recommend that the alignment be
moved back to the existing alignment of Douglas Lane along the perimeter of the
property.
1161 Corporate Drive West · Suite 200 · Arlington, Texas 76006 · (817) 649-32161Metro 64().8212/FAX (817) 649-7645
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
July 7, 1993
Mr. Jim Browne
Page 2
Holiday Lane
Holiday Lane is designated as an M4U (70' R.O.W.). It is currently shown to end at
Bursey. Extending Holiday Lane through the park would:
1) Use an inordinate amount of park land for the benefit gained (at least 4.2
acres );
2) Increase the traffic safety hazard to the park users;
3) Increase traffic through the neighborhood on the east to the park; and
4) Destroy much of the two most heavily wooded areas of the site.
We recommend that either Holiday Lane be removed completely from the Thoroughfare
Plan between Bursey and Starnes Road or that it be moved as far to the east as possible
to reduce the impact on the park.
Sincerely yours,
.1 KEøLLIN
ictor W. Baxter
VWB/ve
OJ;
I·f'~~~...' . '/'
I. '),
! I
. , ¡ j / I
~.
I
1\
\
I
1-
I··
"
~OV1
·rr
I!
i
J ...
iii
o
Ii
.,þoa
Iii
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
f ~
J ~
<t. 7.
~ ~
t; ~
p..
all
~
ª
i
~;l
~~
ts.
is
l\_~~~~~~J
~!I~!~
-~~
l 11
/ ///\ ~
. . ~ . ~- ~ ~ ;- ~ 1· 1
-~1f
LIt
~.,-
.,-./
----;
I
'-- --I
j
---
--.- -.
(-
i
I
I
I
I
/'
('/
I
i
f
~
I
..
:!
¢~
I
,..---.-. . --.- -
t---- -----.------,
. I
I
r- -----------¡
; II
r--------.--
I
r--
CITY OF
NOR.TH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning and Inspections
~ Council Meeting Date: 7/26/93
ubject:
Public Hearing to Consirlør rAvi~inn~ to
the Master Thoroughfare Plan regarding Holiday Lane.
Agenda Number:PS 93-21
Ordinance Number 1905
The future alignment of Holiday Lane on the Master Thoroughfare Plan, between Starnes
Road and Bursey Road, is a straight north-south C-2-U collector street. The Parks and
Recreation Board is requesting the City Council to consider removing this portion of Holiday
Lane from the Plan.
The City recently purchased approximately 100 acres of land in this area for a city park. This
land is generally located east of Douglas Lane, west of the Kingswood Estates subdivision,
north of Starnes Road, and south of the Londonderry subdivision. The proposed Holiday Lane
would run along the eastern edge of this park.
I
I
The Parks and Recreation Board states that the consumption of the land for the park has
reduced the possibility of single family development in this area, and has limited the total
possible population increase in the immediate area. With a lower population base, the
demand for transportation facilities such as roads decreases, and the existing population can
possibly be served with the existing roadways. Alternative north-south routes would include
Douglas Lane, Smithfield Road, Davis Boulevard, and Rufe Snow Drive. East-west routes
would be Bursey Road and Starnes Road.
I
I
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this case at their July 8, 1993 meeting and
. recommended with a split vote of 3-2 to· retain Holiday Lane on the Master Thoroughfare Plan
between Starnes Road and Bursey Rbad.
However, Ordinance Number 1905 has been drafted and attached with this cover sheet for the
council to consider.
RECOMMENDA TION:
It is recommended that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and consider the
recommendation of the planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: . Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
_Operating Budget _
Other ~ ~y-. /7 1"...
(()~ ~ K/ ff};(~
Depa ent Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I·
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{'
I
PZ Minutes - Page 4
July 8. 1993
~~
Public Hearing to consider revisions to the Master Thoroughfare Plan
regarding Holiday Lane.
3. PS 93-21
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak to come forward at this time.
Chairman Brock stated the Master Thoroughfare Plan map was posted
on the bulletin board for viewing. He stated this request would eliminate
the portion of Holiday Lane north of Starnes Road from the Plan.
Mr. Don Presley, 7413 Douglas Lane, came forward to speak. He asked
what Holiday Lane was classified as south of Starnes.
Mr. LeBaron stated it is an M4U roadway, which is a bigger street than a
C2U.
Chairman Brock stated it anyone wants a copy of the Master
Thoroughfare Plan map, they should see Mr. LeBaron at City Hall and he
will provide you with a copy.
Mr. Barfield stated if they do not allow for a larger street in this area. they
are making a big mistake.
Mr. Lueck stated they need to know whether Rute Snow Drive and
Smithfield Road can carry the amount of traffic to the north. He stated
he is concerned about putting a roadway through an environmentally
sensitive area, but they need some way to move traffic through the area.
Chairman Brock stated that Holiday Lane should not go through the
park. He stated Holiday Lane could be the far east boundary of the park.
Mr. Lueck stated Dougtas Lane could go to a C4U roadway, and Holiday
Lane could be eliminated through the park. He stated the Plan only
shows that they need a street in the area, and does not show an exact
alignment.
Ms. Sandra Curtis, 6884 Greenleaf Drive, came forward to speak. She
stated this is a dangerous comer. She stated they need sidewalks on
the road if it is developed. She stated no one wants a four-lane street
next to their house.
Mr. Barfield stated the City Council downgraded Holiday Lane from an
M4U to a C2U last year.
Mr. LeBaron stated that the city does not have plans to build either
street. He stated they are merely drawing a line on a map that
represents a future plan. He stated that streets are built by the
developer of the property, and sidewalks are put in at that time. Mr.
LeBaron stated if the city puts in the street via a bond program, they
must decide at that time whether to include sidewalks in the bond
election.
Ms. Curtis stated they need a comprehensive program to look at these
items.
I·
~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{t
I
PZ Minutes - Page 5
July 8, 1993
Chairman Brock stated that when they developed the Master
Thoroughfare Plan, there were no plans for a park at that site. He stated
they are now reevaluating the Plan.
Ms. Curtis stated they cannot really make a decision without knowing a
little more about the park development. She stated Greenleaf Drive and
Moss Drive will be heavily traveled regardless of the other roads. She
stated they are concerned about where the entrances to the park will be
located.
Mr. Lueck stated they need to relieve Rute Snow Drive somehow
through this area. He stated they must provide planning for roads in the
event the property to the north develops. He stated the Master
Thoroughfare Plan was in place in that area long before the city even
considered buying that land for a park.
Chairman Brock stated their job tonight is to consider removing a portion
of Holiday Lane from the Plan.
Mr. Tad Kuzmerski. 7417 Douglas Lane, came forward to speak. He
stated they could consider having Holiday Lane as the eastern boundary,
and have the park entrance off of Holiday Lane. He stated he lived in
Gilbert. Arizona. where people thought they did not need additional right-
of-way for street because is was always going to be two lanes. He
stated Gilbert is now a suburb of Phoenix, and the traffic situation is
tenible. He stated the area north of Bursey Road will need a north-south
access road.
Ms. Cheryl Lyman, 7828 Tipperary Court, came forward to speak. She
stated it would be very dangerous to put a major thoroughfare next to a
playground for small children. She stated there are already roads that
carry traffic north. She stated they have removed over 700 homes with
this park and the Green Valley soccer complex.
Mr. Lueck stated that 700 homes figure sounds inaccurate, but he does
not know how that will affect the traffic in the area.
Mr. Bob Seale, 7317 Douglas Lane, came forward to speak. He stated
there are two schools in the area that generates a tot of traffic. He asked
how many people will be in the park.
Mr. Lueck stated it depends on what&s in the park.
Mr. Bob Atherton, 7300 Bursey Road, came forward to speak. He stated
there will be a traffic situation regardless of whether Holiday Lane is
deleted. He stated if they vote to remove Holiday Lane, they will then go
to work on some alternative. Mr. Atherton stated they should compare
the alternatives of both plans, rather than considering them separately.
Mr. Lueck stated that is the reason he brought up the issue with Douglas
Lane because that sort of thing can happen.
Chairman Brock stated they could have Hotiday Lane as the eastern
boundary, and leave Douglas Lane as a two-lane street.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Brock closed the
Public Hearing.
I"
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
PZ Minutes - Page 6
July 8, 1993
......
Mr. Baxter stated he is working as a consultant to the parks department
in a professional capacity. He stated Mr. LeBaron told him it is legal for
him to vote if necessary, but he would like to abstain unless there is a
stalemate.
Mr. Wilson stated he always had a hard time envisioning Holiday Lane
as an M4U all the way to the Loop. He stated his opinion is to eliminate
Holiday Lane from running through the park.
Mr. Lueck stated during the planning process, they were not concerned
with those houses that were not going to be built, but were concerned
with taking traffic off of Rute Snow Drive. He stated the absence of the
houses is a wash because of the necessity for the road. He stated he
cannot vote to remove this road from the Plan without being convinced
that the traffic situation in that area will improve.
Mr. Barfield made the motion to deny PS 93-21, thereby leaving Holiday
Lane on the Master Thoroughfare Plan between Starnes Road and
Bursey Road. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck, and the motion
carried 3-2, with Mr. Barfield, Mr. Lueck, and Chainnan Brock voting for
denial. and Mr. Wilson and Mr. Baxter voting against denial.
ZONING CASES
4. PZ 93...11
earing to consider an Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No.
rding the Masonry Requirement.
Mr. LeBaro ated the present regulations require that a residential
structure be a st 75% brick. He stated the proposed regulation would
require each wa be at least 75% brick. He stated this would be
consistent with the mmercial requirements.
Chairman Brock open e Public Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak to come forward. ere being no one wishing to speak,
Chairman Brock closed the lic Hearing.
Mr. Barfield stated brick should e to the door or window header
height of the first floor rather than th ine feet stated. He stated they
should leave in the requirement that a ate materials be approved by
the City Council.
Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PZ 9 1 as discussed. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck.
The motion carried 5-0.
Mr. Lueck asked if those changes would be too mucH
handle every time a plan is reviewed.
Mr. LeBaron stated the change would make it easier to calc
requirement.
I
~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
Ordinance No. 1905
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS, AMENDING THE MASTER
THOROUGHFARE PLAN OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, TO MAKE REVISIONS
REGARDING HOUDAY LANE; PROVIDING A SEVERABIUTY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills has forwarded an
unfavorable recommendation to the City Council for amendment of the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a Public Hearing to consider said revisions, and after hearing,
determines that such revisions shall be adopted.
NOW, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, the portion of Holiday Lane, classified on the Master Thoroughfare Plan as a C2U Minor Collector from its
intersection with Starnes Road to its intersection with Bursey Road, shall be removed from the Master
Thoroughfare Plan; and the Master Thoroughfare Plan shall hereafter reflect these revisions.
2.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause,
sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid
judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any
of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would
have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or
unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
3.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended,
shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance.
4.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage.
DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF JULY, 1993.
~ .¥1A . /J ...8./ J Lt!1/\"
> \.....' . :~ ~ vV .
Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission
I·
I
{'
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 26th DAY OF JULY, 1993.
Mayor, City of North Richland Hills, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
Ordinance No. 1905
Page 2
I"
~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
Llnd~cape J-\rchltec.ture· P Jnnin~· Englneer¡n~
July 7, 1993
\ IUIJr \\. blì\tCr.-\)L-\
!\l"nt E. Be~jev. :\SL-\
o~eph E. Bradlc\', FE
Terrv T. Cheek. ,-\SLA
Terrv E, Cuilender
Dino I. Ferra ¡ i, PE
Dantel 8. Hartman, PE
i\1Jrk C. HJtchel. ASLA
Sanford p, LaHue. jr., PE
Her)hei Lindlv, :\P,--\
Albert'vV. Rollins, PE
Gene Scnrickei, F.--\SLA
Larrv D. Stone, PE
Mr. Jim Browne
Director of Community Services
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609
RE: 100 Acre Starnes Tract / City Park
Routing of Future Streets
Dear Mr. Browne:
The routing of the future streets of Douglas Lane and Holiday Lane through the City Park
property will have an extreme impact on the park development. The Master
Thoroughfare Plan shows both streets running through the park north and south between
Starnes and Bursey. If the current alignments are maintained, the park will be divided by
the streets into three separate properties rather than one. The effect is detrimental to the
park environment and limits the options we have in park development. The impact of this
issue is so serious that the planning of the park cannot proceed until it is resolved.
In the best interest of the development· of the park property we suggest the following
guidelines in dete.rmining the street routes:
1) Keep all nonessential vehicular traffic out of the park. Parks are for people,
not cars.
2) Route all through traffic to the perimeter of the park. This creates a safer
environment and it gives more flexibility in the park development.
3) Create a natural pedestrian oriented atmosphere in the park whenever
possible.
Douglas Lane
In the thoroughfare plan, Douglas Lane is designated as a C2U (60' R.O.W.). Its
alignment as shown would divide the northern portion of the site in half and it would
severely restrict the development of the park. We recommend that the alignment be
moved back to the existing alignment of Douglas Lane along the perimeter of the
property.
1161 Corporate Drive West · Suite 200 · Arlington, Texas 76006 · (817) 649-3216lMetro 640-S212/FAX (817) 649-7645
I'
~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
July 7, 1993
Mr. Jim Browne
Page 2
Holiday Lane
Holiday Lane is designated as an M4U (70' R.O.W.). It is currently shown to end at
Bursey. Extending Holiday Lane through the park would:
1) Use an inordinate amount of park land for the benefit gained (at least 4.2
acres );
2) Increase the traffic safety hazard to the park users;
3) Increase traffic through the neighborhood on the east to the park; and
4) Destroy much of the two most heavily wooded areas of the site.
We recommend that either Holiday Lane be removed completely from the Thoroughfare
Plan between Bursey and Starnes Road or that it be moved as far to the east as possible
to reduce the impact on the park.
Sincerely yours,
.1 KE$LLIN
ictor W. Baxter
VWB/ve
I'
~-
1
1
I
1
1
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
f
1
._~ ¿~}:L ;~~
.~~ <:~:- ~~f 3~
; '.t
:A:; .I 1'· "r·· :.-:.::.:~. ~J,,:,~¿~~~;~ "~'.,;~~ ":~~' 1 ::'~~-~··1~_. i~·1~.?I~~f:=;
",' I tL,
·;._'I'-::;:.'~~1f~ l :;,~~:~: /::;?,~~~ '¡~\~i·? ~: .~~. ;-'~:~-.~~
~~ :~:.~:~, .~. '::t~ü~:~"{··;··i:f::;:;J<~:'''·;:·
·u. '~~.: ~L~~"'''· ~ .~. ).:.: .~_:.
;-'.Hj f~ 'f·r ~ (~:I (~::: 'f~_ J";?'~ c·
"~ . ~ ~f .;"_ -:... '~;. ~
'. r: X ¡::./~~?
..,~: :~. .~ \.:.~. :_~.
lJ{::i':jt~ f::;t_'¡:;i)'N'~ 1 ?·H3 :F~?'~C .~~ (j~.~ I 1'~(:,~,
}: 'S?-i(j 't ~.'.; t]CjCiJ. I (}Ei·,\-.
r f-:f~ËL T}-iË EX -fËf#~~-3 I Qf'~ 'C~F' ;-fOL 1 ùA~{ L~::~f,tt:: ~'~\(}R1'r'~ -f~·~RÚL~Gt·fi::~·D' 'i~::~·~TL~~~Ë ~;ùRt_Ð'
I ;,~ C:[}{'~'8 1 t;·E ,q r~ 1" l' i)f'~ C:f: ......~. .~~:::
:. ;:~~'r i 'r .;: c~~·~ ·:::·~;~_At'ff'i 1 ~'~(J i:;t·~C· Z~j},~ 1 ~'~L~ .(~~, ,I/(yt:::: ·r;(JA í f'~~:3"f' "r~"i I'3
.:;: X "r f:: f'iS i f.}f'~
J~-:: :'--:: 5::: i..::: 'fo.... -:~" .~-:.
).._ ~ : t..._ '__' , ".....
·'···~:t ~-~·;:-·<f:: .;_:' ~:1'[::·,-~"f::·E:-··
~..~, 'F~:í ·~~;(1t)~_ E "
Û ~.. '-'J<'"' - \. 0..'
". "~'I ......b...r:-. J. .' ... t
. . \ ~ x..... \._ I ,\_- ~ , It
.I
.~ .. I
:.... I~~ . _ . ,...;_ ...ð/¿X-/
L ) '4 1_:· r ;~.~.. .
-?7';':}4 ~~ED- Cjf~~'\: '~:3-r ø
f'.fQR1·~-1 f~ 1 (:;~"iLAf'1Ú ~...~ 1 LL 8, ·ff.:: >:A9
~~':5 1 \3~}
I I - IS·T~T."I~_""'ì':"'T-ffi"n'::;':'!::.:' ~¡;: :U¡-
_ _ __. N' U.il.i.l ". - J I ¡ ¡ I ì i : 11 ! i i ¡ i , I d ~ h
., · ~ =r:J ~~ c::t::¡ m ~ EE ~ --rï :::::r:: --1 ~~
. : ~ -:_~ =-::1 ::±::J =~ ~ ~ + ~ ;:¡::: ~ ~ r
. : :- : :..: =- -== =-= ::::¡:: :::::t:::: ::±::J ~ ~ a:: ';::::t: ~ ;::::: I~
-~~f--1 ~~~---4-HL ~' I
I ::- i ~ þ~ . ~::: ~B ;::~ tB ~-I,=
: .~ ~ -: ~__~ ~ == =t: ~:::: ~.J. .~ H
. .. ,-':-. r- ~ , - -I_~ - - f==::. '\ T 1(,1
I ~.- r: -~ ' -= i-~~::. ~II -'-
\--... .-r.-4 ....-, -_;-~ 0.-- AI'
I -\ -" ,..--.....--y- 1-- mP3B = - -,---=:j ~o.- '; ñ : I ~--- -- -
I ,-- J..--- -r-ì '\ - -~ ~ .~II
::- -' ,: ---~"N ~ \ I -~ _L..-J ~ r=t: rC ~ -- ~ r¡1
'.. . - ~ ......- ~ ~~' lJ- --=.- --" t:::t=: t--C :::: (
.~ ~.- '--\ .-I ~ ¡...-. > ~
I '-' 1, ~, ~'~ { ~ ~;.t:: \- '=:"': æ :::b :=Ó-'~ ~ P;~I
- ~ -' X ~ -1-:: ~ ~ ~~ ttj I IT"" ,I -:
- -.--t .-r ......:.W 1 ¡ "I -iJ--<--J ~ ...-.---1 ~ t - ~ ,,'. ~ ~ -- n____ - -
\j.~rf~ ~ l;æ H~ . I ~_i=§ . æfH f ': g-~~ ~" ~ 'I
I t~ r-:- j·r~--rl ~ ~ _8 ~ ~~ P -'--'111 ' ~I":: ~ I~-- - - - ---. - - --
.....J l..- ~ LL....J L- ~ '-~ C:O, T .. H ~- -< II
.'~ .:... 1 -; I : :-r-r-0DJ' T T ,1 T T : \ I TTTr~lTl ~=~ ~ -l ..-= -.... I! ~
'ï; r j I' I 1 \ ¡ , T : I' 1 I I / '~~~ ~ ~~ ,;', T I ~ --. I: ~ ¢
,.J-~ ~ .L..L.L~' ~ ~ ~- ~r. ' 0
I..... 1-r~"') <~ I~ , " ,~ l::tj \~~~ ~W._ :";-"=:-J~ ~ -.-' ~1
- L~À' ~ \ ~ I , , ~.t-....l:~ '.----1 m ~ -H !! -...¡ ,I ,-
-+-'-'''\./ /, - 1 Iii I ,! ~ I Î ì ,--~ ~~, ~ ~II I
I: D~~~ ,tJ ~ ¡ i ~II
~ ~..u~¡ ~~ t!!!L.- .! I" I 111
~ m ; I , ! ¡ ! \ r ,I' ~ " · '- _,.. I I
-----
." IT\.I I ~ ~-~ !
ILl ~ \ : ~ =!EËÎg' ¡ : 11 '
'TTI! \. I -.....- - I I 01
~ d_~ ~ ;-, ¡ i I \~
I; .......~~~~ "I! 11 ,pI \ \ \ t
_ ~ II Iii ,I ~~ I // ii, : \ \\
. ....-.-: \ : I , ' , ¡, · I I I"', : . ~~ I L-< ii /,_LU:.--L..L4.J-LJ.J Lu I I ¡ I I Ii. = 17 i ¡ :, ;.: ~i ¡ i : . ; i i i: ", :
~/1T T, . I 11, t J,: \ :, ' r, ~ cj ¡-I r-r:rTLf ¡ I I ! I J, I ¡ ¡ - ì I l ¡ I I ¡ I ' 1 r r ,¡ T ~
1t: : : , \ , I:! "p: ," ¡ /I J ¡ í ¡ ¡ r T' I =---~ ~ f J I í !...L T 1 11 I I ; II! ¡ \ \
I ~:1= ! . n I: I U , I ¡Ii I k=-- I ¡ I ¡ ¡ 1 ,: T T 18! I ¡ I I I \ \
~ \ II 1\ \ ¡ \ H ~ ~::J¡ i í .,IM:ui I! I ii i J t:I- ! WIIll 1__ J J 1 í [II ¡ I \ \
~ \\.1 I I ¡ ¡ I I r f li'''"~_81ffi __I I I I W r-1 ~\ \-,- i ¡ Ii· I III ¡ I ¡ ¡
I t:j I I ¡ I Iii I · 1 : I \ '---1 U . \ V::;:"p : T ; T ï r T I I I I I \
H I \ i Fl:::¡ r I ! ¡ T, ~'_ [1 T i III I I: J , " ~, ~:- J ¡ I ¡ f l J ~) L.1 I I I \
.::: II ~ 1 i ' 1 1 µ I i I I T~ ! \ T ! 1 ]:I!' 1 I \ ! 8 rFi t=t=4"¡-PJ8mª
I~- I I 1 ~ r 1 I I I T~ r" ¡ LL :' I' I '\ ~ r) 1 !': 1" ]I
i-- ~~~ t---W I, f~ J"'! '.! \" ~ r ~ r Jr .r J[
= ~~ - t::Il I I j ~~"-4 ~, 1 ' ~ :, i r ~ T ~ r /"\ I "" rË
~ - - - , ~ --4-i i r:r-;--, r-;f[ TIT ~::.:__=__J0 r ¡
;::= = al ~ ¡ ~ I I rrJJ:m ¡---.-: ~---r-~ LLLU ¡:-<"-L~g=J t:t::J
I ~ t:= = 1\111 i ~ rTT1 . I . : D, r I
~~ ~=-~ ' =-= :::=~ ' I b: I: I
:::: ~::j - ==I~:::: " I I i I;
, ! ,_.-J _ "--- -I-~ I I )
'---- _'''' II!.A ~I-L- ¡ ,~, ~
:;rr'11 -=3 'l~--UL:
~ -=:~ ~ ir! I' '~ L - ~
Err 1\+ ~b 'I ~ ~ :
0' III F, , ,~ L ¡ //'
±g§r II J J lLll,L i ¡ ¡ ¡ ~c. _._~,: ,--~-~
- l II I j;.~=_. ,; I ~_y
,rn II II II \ ~~r- ~ f--
'I, ': h~~, ~~.,. ..r--t--'_. [=:-1 II, ¡ ,\; I: ;1111111/: ì I ì i r i IJ.,;\
~ \ '\ ~ ~ T , r ¡ 1 I I 1 T ì ! I f Tiff '\
1/, ~, '. t y~' '\ ~: r ~ I I I ¡ ¡ P.I I ¡ I I 11 ;
'. ,- ~" /; ','. 'I I ~~.\ ~-~ ~~'-l
-~ I 1 1, I TT > ^ I ì'ï'"T;" J:. L -; /....1.....,
-.- - ---
----,
~
j
-'
/'
·
·
·
·
·
·
!!
8 w ~ ~
~! V\ ~
~~ ; ~
7' 0 .S!' f
.." >--
~ ¥ î
« ~ Æ
- g
8
R.
----.--..
~
/ ¡ J
iL-
/ /~, -...
//... I .
I
\>,
1 [ r 1 r r 1 r--r- -, r t l' 1 " . 1 . 1. ~
r .. r .,. -r --t- ..".-.~ ..-.- J
I
I ~: \\. ~~1; ~r lijJ@tj~~. ~~rfT!.~: TC2lrl' =
I ~ j ~ 1-1' "'\'I"~ ~~ ~ ~ . p ~ ,~ -'~ ~~~ -~ ~ ~ .. ~ r:H ~ ; l-- ~ ~-
..... · t ~ ~ ~ t-) - ;. .. ~ ~ -ci I -.. ~ Þ' ~-.......... r 1 ~ ~ t ~ . +-- 1. r 1 ~ = r' + ~ ~ .... ~ ~
· · · t ~ ~ Iu - · " t......... 3 t ... ~~ gb::.:t 4, ......~... . . Ii': 1" ,."..... f . V I
~ I ~ r : ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ .~. #-1 1 [~-1, ~ --1 1 f n ~ : : :J:~ ~ 1L ~~·!r ~ I",
fIII'tIJ¡I .. rI 1,"- T ~ T T . r r .. . '-TT r ~..- ~ ~. -~ L..J L..l........J 1---1 _J: -1 1- ... ~..,. -; ... ., .. 1 T ,. 1
I · ""Krì j ~/,""+þ. 1ì--"" >-~ ~ t ~~I. ' í I I ¡"'. j II ¡: I'" ~ {:~. -: ;~, ¡-&, · ...."
r~ 1-.ml Llll! I ~~ · T ~ t" ~ ~ ~ + I ~ ~ ~ (3 1 '~lr ~ :; f~.. ~/ ..1 ~
. ...¡;""¡",;,, J"l >- i---< · ~ I,iJf!, , \ .. - - ~ .¡J. .W~ ßo 1 '--....J. 1 1 _ .. -r Á. r ~ T ,
~! N I~~!~~~§~+ ~~'~ ~~~ ~¡¡~ ~iP: ~ ~[!!it ::a
1=1 T tl----I:cG~ \, rl re I ~r i!"~' ~ T-:,-
- - - ..- .-- ~-... ~ - \ ~ "^ : --tr:Tt:l
!- I r r ILl T TIT \' \' ~- . : ~ ~'''Ir .. i .
I ' r ' ! . I I ~ . >-- : '--11 r [ , T T
I r ,. --r--¡ I . ! ' . .1 1 r ~I~ ? t ; ~ ~ I
. I I . ~ -..- - - ....- "1' ~ II
..¿ -~~:_j-= II C21U r ,{ _~D:í~:~~__~lf C2U ~:~__
~ ~ r DO'UG. LAS I~ ~ --~-----1·-I1L~-"(.p.J
r-~ I I 1Irw- T -. ~Á~ T 1 L N >---cÝÌ . jr411
~.. I I ~. -... - · I . _ ~ ~ .
~D ~J: -~ I ~ _ , , ..~~~~. ;>-Iiti
I r ItM4U' I c ~ u o~~ ,-' : ~. ;oC,(,
I I ~I ~ ~J_Tr I "-~r~·~~'..~~~~,~~~.~.~-.
- - -- .~.--., v-<. .. II I I I }I Ii ,',.. . ,-. . ,_, . ,.,_.
~ r TIT Ih~. ~- "( ----, I~ 1 ~ ~; --~ - . ~t i,. . . ~, 1. . ¡ . ..
~ I .- - .. ,_c J \. l' .-......&. ~I , T " ' . , . I ' . . 1 ' ~
!: ~ · T ~ r1f= . I· ~ ' -: c-) ~ ~[T T + r : r j + T' · l' . I fT' ~ - .. · ..... t .. t{ ,
'IIIII~ ~ r' T ¡ T I r I II ~ ~ jii c: .....! .. . . ~ I, ~I J. 6 ~ . tx'*f · . .. 1
r T 7T. I I · J r liT"!"" ¡ I I I I Ii. ~~ ~~ .: · " > 1JI) ~ ~ q q ~ IT " _
I -ft -l.. 1 , T 11 ' <~~ \J : TI T ¡ r lJ r f ~-.( ~ ,. 1 -- .. . ...,..;,~.: ~ II ¿, +- + t + ~ + + . t +, ~ ~ . _
-,- '" r ~ IU(IJI'1"7W" ,oÍ ~ ¡ J. j J ~ r ''Þ' .. ... ., ~
~ ~ LlJ Tl' Î i - ~- - ~ ->I ~r-r :at:::-.. -. " .- ... _ ... \..~~..~..
o - _ ... " ;-.....J ~ 'II ....!...J.. T TT II I I -.L . . ~ , ~ .: : f". " ~ 'I ,_ · : - r~ _
r- ~ - >----->--' - ~-::- ' . "II J ~ I r TT 1[ T - ., "'-- , r.:;¡",¡",¡"" ".. --- · T'... , . _ : , .. H .. ~ . r
11 Irñ= T"iT 5':'1; Itlr.:r'flll ~:.~.! L_ T'"~ ¡ , - -0 -.~ . ~ £
:Þ- r I -I ¡ ; L r"'l 11 -~ ~. In....;t;II- I', J (r!7,::' 5 --~ 1 ¡r 1: 1 t ~ ~
. f :::1......I..LJ ~ - - It .~- ~ ~ '.. IT. T -< Ii 1 .. . · ~ ' 1;
I r: = m, ~i:~::: I~;#;'~ ' · , , , 'ì-r T - iji ___I,· -- · ---~
'f' f ~1~~ìt:,i:~I~ .-=_~t"''''~ ~~'IJtl~J ! ...~
, ~ ... ,..., , f' -- _ - .J . -, _ ~ ------ 1'1--11. .......- __ _ _ , =
..··t.....~..·++., Ir:"lr- -=: I ----.._ _ ';:'1~-_"'__.
· ~! r .~j ~ -- "1 _ I' ! - --- - ~I _ .
I ~ ~. .. '~+t-: "~..I~p!-4:'= ~ : ), L! , r ~> , ~ J~I'n - , .. ~
3C" ~ r T , T ~ 1 I r ' l.J..).-.( J ---¡-- --- aa
···....11 ':'-+1-++ :!IIµ?rrn--;4- - rlA ..- ¡c::
---:=---¡--;-; _...J -----.l1ooo'- /-. ~----......~,~ ~.. . . I _
-# "Ja."'" . __ .... . _ ~
¡
~
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Planning and Inspections
C 'I M . D 7/26/93
ouncl eetlng ate:
Subject: Cnn~irlAr ::¡mAnnmAnt to the Subdivision
Regulations, Ordinance Number 1579, to
require the construction of sidewalks on double
and triple frontage lots by the developer.
Agenda Number:PS 93-27
Ordinance Number 1909
The attached ordinance will amend the Subdivision Regulations to require the construction of
sidewalks by the developer along the rear of a lot which has double frontage. Corner lots
which have a second frontage will also require construction of the side yard sidewalk at the
time when the subdivision is approved. Home builders will continue to install the front yard
sidewalk as a part of their building permit requirement for the new home.
RECOMMENDA TION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance Number 1909.
I Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
I - Othe
I
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
efl~
ent Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Fenance Director
Page 1 of
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1909
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1579, THE SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE, TO REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION OF
SIDEWALKS IN NEW SUBDIVISIONS OR RESUBDIVISIONS;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
SA VINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
I.
THA T, ORDINANCE 1579, "THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS", SECTION 1-01, is hereby amended to add the
following new paragraph:
G.Sidewalk Requirements
Every new subdivision, or resubdivision hereafter approved shall be required to
install sidewalks, with appropriate curb ramps, adjacent to all public street rights-
of-way. Construction of any sidewalk shall conform to the standards and
specifications contained in the Design Manual. Sidewalk placements shall
conform to the following:
A. All comer lots shall have sidewalks placed on the two frontages or sides
adjacent to the streets.
B. Any triple frontage lots shall have sidewalks placed on the three frontages or
sides adjacent to the streets.
C. Any double frontage lots shall have sidewalks placed on the two frontages
adjacent to the streets.
D. Construction of all side yard sidewalks and rear yard sidewalks shall be the
developer's responsibility to construct after plat approval. Front yard
sidewalks shall be constucted for each lot prior to completion of any primary
structure.
II.
SEVERABILITY CLA USE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City
Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are
severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall
be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the
remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the
same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this
ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or
section.
III.
SA VINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance No. 1579, The Subdivision Ordinance of the City
of North Richland Hills, as amended shall remain in full force and effect, save and except
as amended by this ordinance.
IV.
EFFECTIVE VA TE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication as provided by the North Richland Hills Charter and the laws of
the State of Texas.
PASSED, AND APPROVED this 26th day of July, 1993
APPROVED:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTORNEY
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I.epartment:
Subject:
I
I
I
Legal
Tri-County Electric Rate
Increase - Ordinance No. 1908
Council Meeting Date: 7 /2 6 /9 3
Agenda Number: GN 93-98
On May 24, 1993 the City Council denied a request from Tri-Country Electric for
a rate increase. Tri-County refiled their application with the City for a rate
increase on July 12, 1993. Tri-County refiled their application because they
inadvertently failed to file it in a timely manner with the Public Utilities
Commission. Ordinance No. 1908 denies the increase.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council approve Ordinance No. 1908.
e
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
e Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
-'- -
J
,~ it/~-
City Manager
. Finance Director
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
/'
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1908
WHEREAS, Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc. filed a Schedule of Rates with the
City on or about July 12, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the City Staff has reviewed the rate filing package which the Council
finds would constitute an increase in electric rates; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that such Schedule of Rates should be denied.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1.
The Schedule of Rates filed with this City by Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc.
be and is hereby in all things disapproved and denied.
2.
The City Secretary shall give notice to the applicant of this action by sending a
certified copy of this ordinance to Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc. at its Keller office
located at 4740 Keller-Hicks Roads, Keller, TX 76248.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 26th day of July, 1993.
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown - Mayor
A TIEST:
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire - Attorney for City
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
1--
_
I
I
TRI-CDUNTY
Electric Cooperative, Inc.
"The Powerful Alternative"
Azle Headquarters Office /600 N W Parkway I Azle. Tx 76020/ Ph:(817)444-3201 or (817)523-72311 Fax # (817)444-3542
Granbury District Office / Rt 3 Box 2101 Granbury. Tx 76048 1 Ph:(817)443-0306 or (817)573-3667 1 Fax # (817)443-6138
KeUer District Office /4740 Keller Hicks Rd / Keller. Tx 762481 Ph:(817)431-15411 Fax # (817)431-9680
July 12, 1993
Mayor and Governing Body
City of North Richland Hills
Gentlemen:
I hand you herewith for filing pursuant to Section 43 of the Public
utility Regulatory Act (V.A.C.S. Art 1446c) the statement of Intent
of Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc. Bound together with the
statement is a Petition for Authority to Change Rates in accordance
with the statement of Intent and all supporting data required by
and filed with the Public utility Commission of Texas in connection
with the rate change.
Please set this matter on the Agenda for the next City Counsel
meeting and take final action approving or denying the proposed
rates at that time. Also, please send to the Cooperative a copy of
the City's resolution acting on the Cooperative's request as soon
as it is prepared.
Please indicate receipt of this filing by your signature, title,
date and time of receipt noted upon the copy of this letter
presented herewith and return the executed copy.
Sincerely,
Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc.
By:
Uly Authorized Representative)
Enclosures
Received City of North Richland Hills
Name:C3ætuet~ ~
-Title: ¿2øé-~ ~~/~
Date: 1- L/Lt(.3:J /1:63 Ci-lYl.
I
II.epartment:
Subject:
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Property Tax Refund
7/26/93
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: GN 93-99
Finance
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
The Texas Property Tax Code Section 31.11 (a) requires that refunds over $500
be approved by the governing body. The following refund requests have been
received.
Dallas Meadow Outback Apts. $6,154.00 ARB Lowered Value of Property
8435 Thousand Oaks Drive
Undeveloped Land $ 919.96 ARB Lowered Value of Property
7750 Watauga Road
Total
$7,073.96
Recommendation:
The tax office recommends approval of the refund as outlined above.
Finance Review.
I
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
e Operating Budget
Other
Page 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Finance
Contract with Tarrant County
for Tax Collections
Council Meeting Date: 7 /26/93
Agenda Number: GN 93-100
SUbject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The attached report from Finance Director Larry Cunningham provides detailed
information about a proposed contract with Tarrant County for tax collection
services. Based on his analysis, it appears there will be a substantial
savings to the taxpayers by entering into this agreement. During the
transition period next year, the apparent savings would be approximately $6, 700
and the annual savings thereafter will be approximately $31,000. The study
indicated that there will be little or no diminution of quality of services.
Recommendation:
It is "recommended that the City Council approve the contract with Tarrant
County for tax collection services beginning October 1, 1993 in accordance with,
the detailed plan outlined in the attached memorandum.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. Finance Director
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
City of
orth Richland Hills
July 21, 1993
MEMO TO: Rodger N. Line, City Manager
FROM: Larry Cunningham, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Contract with Tarrant County for Tax Collections
The Tarrant County Tax Assessor-Collector's Office currently
collects taxes for 33 taxing entities in Tarrant County, and is
able to perform this service at a much lower cost than most
jurisdictions can do individually because of volume, consolidation
and shared costs. In the interest of providing North Richland
Hills' citizens the best service at the lowest possible cost, we
have evaluated the feasibility of contracting our tax collections
to the Tarrant County Tax Assessor-Collector beginning October 1,
1993.
The Tarrant County Assessor-Collector is willing to provide the
City of North Richland Hills comprehensive tax collection services
which range from obtaining the necessary assessments from Tarrant
Appraisal District, preparing and sending tax statements to owners
or mortgage companies, collection of current and delinquent taxes,
providing timely deposits of collections, providing regular reports
regarding status of collections and properties, and assisting in
representing us in law suits over disputed accounts. In short,
their proposal includes performing all the tasks presently
performed in house associated with collection of taxes. However,
tax attorneys for delinquent taxes would continue to be hired by
the City of North Richland Hills although the county would perform
the delinquent billing.
Tarrant County proposes to provide these services at a cost of 40¢
per financial transaction (parcel) plus a set up charge the first
year of $450. This would cost $7,244 (40¢ X 18,109 parcels) plus
$450 or $7,694. After the first year, the cost would be $7,244
plus any growth of transactions. The county would include North
Richland Hills on its tax statement to property owners that would
also list other taxing entities which the county collects for and
which North Richland Hills residents pay taxes to.
(817) 581-5500 · P.O. BOX 820609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 78182
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
Page Two
The North Richland Hills Tax Department's tentative budget for
1993-94 is $151,351. However, this includes $80,000 for appraisal
costs to be paid to Tarrant Appraisal District and $23,500 for
delinquent tax attorney services. This leaves a net tax collection
budget of $47,851.
In evaluating this contracting method, we surveyed several cities
and one school district currently contracting with Tarrant County
to learn of their experience with Tarrant County. These included
the City of Fort Worth, Fort Worth Independent School District,
City of Euless, City of South Lake and the City of Bedford. The
HEB School District has signed a contract beginning fiscal year
1993-94 and they shared some of their reasons for deciding to
contract this service. The consensus of those surveyed was that
they are satisfied with the services provided, collection rates are
good, reports are useful and timely, deposits are made timely, and
cooperation is good. It was also the consensus that since a smooth
transition to a new collection system is essential, they
recommended some continuation staff for coordination purposes and
some continuing part-time staff thereafter for monitoring and
working with delinquent tax concerns.
After evaluating this proposal for Tarrant County, it is
recommended that we contract with Tarrant County beginning October
1, 1993 and that we maintain a transition staff to coordinate these
efforts and to insure that our files, maps, and accounts are
thoroughly documented by us and properly transferred. This
transition time will also give us an opportunity to carefully
review their reports, assure all transfers have been made,
delinquencies are continued during this transition, and computer
files and the GIS System information is completed for tax purposes.
To implement this contract, we propose to retain the current North
Richland Hills Tax Collector through her already planned retirement
date of early summer 1994 to complete the above mentioned work.
The following year, we propose to hire only a part-time person to
assist with the delinquent collection updates with our tax
attorney, monitor the reports, maintain the computer data files and
map information. Therefore, the first year's cost savings would be
$6,694 but the annual savings the second year and thereafter would
be approximately $31,000.
The breakdown of costs and savings for tax collections for the City
of North Richland Hills are as follows:
1. 1st Year (1993-94)
· NRH Tax Collector expenses (9 months)
· Contract with Tarrant County
($7,244 plus $450 start up)
· Miscellaneous supplies & training
Total Estimated Cost
Cost Without Contract
Net Savings - 1st year
$29,463
7,694
4,000
$41,157
(47,851)
$ 6,694
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
Page Three
2. 2nd Year (1994-95)
· Contract with County (40¢ X 18,109)
· Part-time personnel
· Miscellaneous supplies/training
Total Collection Expense
Tax Collection - City Cost
Net Savings - 2nd year
$ 7,244
7,500
2,000
$16,744
(47,851)
$31,107
The term of the contract is one year. It can be terminated at any
time within this year. However, the County Assessor-Collector
advises that State Law requires the county to collect taxes for any
taxing entity, and therefore she does not believe the county can
terminate the agreement at all. There are no provisions for future
rate increases. The 40¢ charge has been the same for at least the
past eight years.
I would like to recommend that the City Council consider
contracting with Tarrant County for tax collection services
beginning October 1, 1993 and that we provide transition staff for
the first year and part-time staff as needed thereafter, as
outlined above.
LC/gp
~1vr;~30LYJfp~
, "'--/
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
;\1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
I Other
Finance
7/'Æ/fB
Council Meeting Date:
Update of Indirect Cost Allocation
from General Fund to Utility Fund
Agenda Number: --'ìN 93-101
For more than 15 years, the City of North Richland Hills has been assessing an
indirect cost to the Utility (water & sewer) Fund to reimburse the General Fund for
costs that have been incurred by the General Fund on behalf of the water and sewer
operations. By using this procedure, referred to as the Administrative Fee, costs
are accurately allocated and the General Fund does not subsidize the water and
sewer operations, thereby making the rates for these services realistic and insuring
cost recovery.
In an effort to assure cost recovery and adequate cost allocation to the Utility Fund,
on March 22, 1993, the City Council authorized KPMG Peat Marwick to update the
indirect cost allocation to the Utility Fund. Peat Marwick conducted this update
study by interviewing city personnel in various departments regarding their time
performing various tasks, analyzing budget and statistical data related to these
utility operations, and conduc~ing cost studies of city operations to determine 'their
impact on the water and sewer departments.
Peat Marwick's conclusions are that the indirect cost allocation for the Utility Fund
~s adequate in recovering costs. They identified the indirect cos ts at $1, 026 , 374 .
Recommendation: It is recommended that the updated cost allocation model prepared
by Peat Marwick be adopted for the Utility Fund.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Suffi lent Funds.Available
. Finance Director
-
-
I
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
¡- Operating Budget
I - Other
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Finance
Council Meeting Date: 7 /26/93
Subject:
Indirect Cost Allocation Study
Park & Recreation Facilities Development corporatIon
Agenda Number: GN 93-102
Following the adoption of the new half cent sales tax for parks and recreation
facilities, it was decided that an administrative fee should be assessed similar to that
of other enterprise funds in order to recover costs incurred by the General Fund for
activities of the newly formed Park and Recreation Facilities Development
Corporation. It was also deemed important to be consistent in the manner in which
cost recovery is handled throughout the city.
The current year's budget includes a $159,740 allocation in the Park Division of the
General Fund for four new park and recreation personnel added to the Parks
Department as needed to plan and administer the newly adopted sales tax program.
These costs are referred to as direct costs because they are included in the Parks
Division budget. They are offset by a transfer from the Parks Sales Tax Fund to the
General Fund.
In order to more accurately determine the indirect costs that the General Fund is
incurring on behalf of the Parks Corporation, and again to be consistent in
administering these charges, Council authorized on March 22, 1993, along with the
Utility Fund indirect cost update, KPMG Peat Marwick to conduct a study of indirect
costs applicable to the Parks & Recreation Facilities Corporation. As in the study
for the Utility Fund, Peat Marwick conducted this study by interviewing city
personnel in various departments regarding their time performing various tasks,
analyzing budget and statistical data related to these functions, and conducting cost
studies of city operations to determine their impact on these two departments.
The study of the Parks Corporation was more involved and required extensive
analysis and evaluation since this is a new activity which began in January, 1993
with the implementation of the half cent sales tax. Peat Marwick identified both
direct and indirect costs associated with the Park Corpqration. The direct operating
costs are those incurred by the hiring of additional personnel for the Corporation's
activities, costs of Park & Recreation personnel who significantly, 'but not totally
spend time on Corporation activities, and the out-of-pocket cos.ts for supplies.,
maintenance, and sundry items incurred to carry out the Corporation's activities.
The indirect costs are those which other departments of the City perform on behalf
of the Corporation.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available,
~?J~0~&AJ
~ ~1d-Z;~
City Manager
. Finance Director
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-2-
Peat Marwick concluded that $208,013 would properly be charged to the Corporation
as direct costs, and the indirect costs of the Corporation should be $127 ,563. These
total $335,576. These amounts are based on annualized costs for 1992-93. Since the
Corporation will be operational only two-thirds of the '92-93 fiscal year, no more
than 66.7% of this amount should be charged this year. For 1993-94 fiscal year, it
is recommended that the same cost method be used, which will amount to
approximately $350,000 for the full year.
Peat Marwick further recommends that the City document and strengthen the
procedures for recording direct charges so they are uniform throughout the City,
and that the Indirect Cost Model be used on an interim period until the necessary
operational changes are in place that will allow for a more accurate and equitable
method of cost allocation of services provided to the Parks & Recreation Development
Corporation.
The Park and Recreation Board voted unanimously on August 10, 1992 to recommend
this approach to the City Council.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Indirect Cost Study and recommendations of Peat Marwick
be approved and adopted, and that their recommended model be used for the next
three years and then reviewed to reflect any changes that may have occurred.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I:
j
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I. Department:
I Subject:
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
Leqal
Authorizing Eminent Domain Proceedings,
Resolution No. 93-33
Council Meeting Date: 7/26/93
Agenda Number: GN 93-103
Resolution No. 93-33 authorizes eminent domain proceedings to acquire portions
of Parcels 4, 4a and 7 ( Strummer Drive proj ect) if negotiations are not
successful.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council approve Resolution No. 93-33.
II
!
I
II
I
II
I
II' Source of Funds:
I Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Ie Operating Budget
II Other
I
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
I ') ~Å ~/ .
/ C_ /l ./ï/~'
¡ , ity Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
RESOLUTION NO. 93-33
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas, that:
1.
The attorney for the City is authorized to continue
negotiations for purchase of the necessary right of way for the
strummer Drive street-widening project and to file eminent domain
proceedings to acquire the necessary right of way and
construction easements, if he is unable to successfully negotiate
purchase.
2 .
The Council finds that the three parcels listed below are
tracts which it is necessary to acquire for the said street
widening project:
Parcel 4 (strummer Drive Project). Owner is Harvey
Greenwald; being a portion of Lot 8, Richland Oaks Addition,
First Filing, to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant
County, Texas, plus a temporary construction easement over said
tract.
Parcel' 4 A (Strummer Drive Project). Owner is Ronnie Ann
Greenwald IV Spendthrift Trust¡ being a portion of Lot 9,
Richland Oaks Addition, First Filing, to the City of North
Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, plus a temporary
construction easement over said tract.
Parcel 7 (strummer Drive Project). Owner is Overton Bank
and Trust N.A.¡ being a portion of Block F of Lot 1 of the
Richland Oaks Addition to the City of North Richland Hills,
Tarrant County, Texas, plus a temporary construction easement
over said tract.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 26th day of July, 1993.
APPROVED:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Departmen' inance
.SUbject: Authorization to Purchase
I "Spot MarKet tlaS1S'
I
I
I
I
Fuel on
7/26/93
Council Meeting Date:
PU93-47
Agenda Number:
For several years Council has authorized staff and the City
Manager to purchase gasoline and diesel fuel on a "spot market
basis". This method involves obtaining three bids over the
telephone and awarding the bid to the low bidder. In the past
this method has been determined to be the most advantageous way
to purchase fuel.
Recommendation: It is recommended City Council authorize staff
and City Manager to purchase gasoline and diesel fuel on the
"spot market basis".
.'
I
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
a Operating Budget X
~Other _____
~Lf~~d Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number 06-01-03-2960
Sufficient Funds ailable
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
4epartment: Community Services Department .. Council Meeting Date: 7-26-93
Authorization to Solicit Bids for Removal of
ubject: Debris and Clean-Up of Family Aquatic Park Agenda Number:PU 93-48
staff requests authorization to solicit bids for clean-up of the Family
Aquatic Park site, located at the 59 acre Engler tract on S.H. 26 across
from Tarrant County Junior College-Northeast Campus.
Prior to preceding with design of the Family Aquatic Park a topographic
survey must be prepared. The site is currently littered with lumber,
deteriorating horse pens and shelters, metal concrete, and discarded
construction materials.
In order to accurately and effectively perform the survey work, ·the site
should be cleaned of this debris. The old house, large barn, and water
tank structure are not a part of this clean-up work, and will remain
. intact until the historical/cultural survey and report is completed.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that city counil authorize advertising for bids for
clean-up of the Family Aquatic Park site.
e
ATTACHMENT: site Plan
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
. Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_operating. BUdg. et _
Wbther
4-~~~~
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
¡e1ll~
City Manager
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I rT'~/~- \~,~~~~~ 1\ N ¥ I'
~ ~ ..,_.,~.__..._..._-- .... .-
+. f
~ '
~+ I
~ I
I
i
+ ,
., I
+. i
,
"', I
'-.¡;:
I
1
-..J
..,.
>:
.' -
Q
~
I
NO'-
,f"t
U~
..,.
~
I ~,,:
'~~r. .~&
~
!
I
T-
I
I
1-- 'u'.,,·
I,
I.
I
1
I
I
,...
I
I
I
:1
.1
I
;J~
~~.
~:(.
<.)~. \. - .
.¿ .,' .~.
~;_AJ.I::>.¡'!~ ..~.._.._.~'~..
,.... ~,t-O' W t-U.t:fON ~;~ / ;/
.,. / /
~'" / ~/
¡;/ ./
. .~~+. fj
....~~..
..-~;~~/'
.,/;-~
..,.' ./~
cu
'-
:J
+"
U
::J
'-
+"
t/)
~
c:
to
~
~
! .
"C
c: .
tOe.
'" ::J
-¡: -c
..oa1
C1J c:
-c to
-co!!
a1 u
~"C
+" c:
~ to
U-c
'" QJ
\4->
o 0
to E
a1 a1
'- '-
CO a1
a1..o
+"
CO 0
e+"
xë;
0-
'- '-
o.~
. a. CO
..~~< E
),?:-:"':." .
'-
C1J
+"
CO
==
-c
c:
CO
....
~f"OII
'V1
-~
~-r";;;".
.'
.>:t.~'..
"'1'.~',
'>"/... '\.
~J"
""
~
u:
0=
::
QJ
...
t/)
~
'-
C'O
0-
a1
'-
U
<
co
en
&n
~.
t)
'~.
~ ~
.~ .~
~ .,
~':..
.¿
~
u..
¿
CD _
-
...... þ. -........,
t'
. - --....
"
. .
~
:J
u=
1-
-:.w:;
.....
U
..
'"
r.
Z:,.
;...
~~~. \
~
u..
::E
.
"-
. .
~
(\J
. .
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Public Works
Strummer Drive Widening Project
RA~irlAnti;:J1 A~[p Ji~itinn
Lot 13, Block 0, Richland Oaks Addition
Council Meeting Date:
7/26/93
Subject:
Agenda Number:
PU 93-49
Staff has reached agreement with Jack Perkins to purchase his home at 821 6 Jerri Jo for the
Strummer Drive Widening Project.
The negotiated compensation is $83.500.00 plus relocation expenses. These expenses are moving
costs and closing costs on a replacement home. The exact amount of these expenses hasn't been
determined but should not exceed $ 5,000.00; Mr. Perkins will be asked to provide a written estimate
of these costs.
The appraised value of the property is $ 75,000.00. Mr. Perkins hasn't yet found a replacement
property but staff feels paying $3,500.00 over the appraised value is a reasonable compromise. The
additional $5.000.00, bringing the total to $83.500.00. is the estimated cost of removing and
relocating Mr. Perkin/s ham radio tower and equipment.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of $83,500.00 payment to Jack Perkins upon receipt of an executed
warranty deed for the subject property (including radio tower), plus verifiable relocation expenses.
I
I
I
I
I
"I
I
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Oth
Finance Review
Acct. Number 13-30-92-6000
Sufficient Funds Available
~/~~7 ~~~
\12 fJ~ /~
nt Head Signature /6itY Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. FInance Director
~;il
Page 1 of
I
I
.
I
=¡i
-
,
L~
t~
IN I. REV,
DGA 1-25-91
DGA 2-13-91
HAM 5-1-91
DGA 8-2-91
DGA 8-20-9J --
Ktit. 11-20-9J
DGA J2-3J-9J
DGA 1-15-92
DGA J-22-92
KtiL 2-21-92
TCH 3-27-92
KtiL 5-8-92
TCH 6-24-92
...
~
1.
. ,g¡[.
- "
R"OO
fLOO (Ø..
2
! ~""L.~~=rJ:~ j
,
_ NOATHEAS¿AMPU:
..
ø~(b~(b
~ L.~CE
\'4~L.
w ' W ',,£'1
5U~ 606
~,,1
~.. .... -
(LOT ,~ I ¡?L.O(..)c..
""----'--- - .......... -
13A _1 ~
12ft 1.11
"" lOR I TA.
- .. 2A. .. ,.-1. ( If
IIR 3A f'" ~ ~ IR ~ ,
leA' , M ) ~
17R.. . ~
3~ 4 'I .eA 1¡f;'" ,-
~ _ " .. ~ ¡ leA 7R ¡ I
2 --;;;-. ... lor .. r .. ¡ ...
Þ 3A Ir ~-3A tfì S!5A :~- .TA~
"-' _ · I"" IR C',..... NPT sea
· ~ 2A ..." ~.
. '" ' "~I I'''' .aII . _ ... _
\ ":" ~:\ .,. .. 3~ ~ ~~ ~~. I~ "". '(; ~ ;. I;'
.,i' \ '" .. ' ~'<, - JERRIE JO DR ~ I J
~T '- ",' ~; ~~~ '~. U! 111:·1 ~'I ~·I.'~~ :,1 ~·I :t~.'!
I:' '2 3 ~n ~ ~~ I ~ I ---~---~I ·
m;-- ~ I 17 · sa 'Ia ,- OAt<5 I
~ I..... - - 'NO I I IS I I I
· 25 It!. . 18 ! 15! : 17 · so 1 ~l,A.~ - - _ _ _ ~ _ _
- -"- r----:.-I R·, JI ~A\~O I II I
Ir 2. , ~
..-1 2 I I 11 I U I I II I --..a-.. _ _ I
23 ----:-...
.----. , 3
22 ---:..-
-=---
,.
.....'i;ì
~('}
I~~
. 2 !
~ ----
'. 3.
-=--
a, 4 I
.--=---.
~ 5
~
; .
~
. ,
-..a..-..
~ 20 5
~ ---:.-~
_____ ~~ I
10 ,~ 18 ~
~~~ 7 ~
~ ~ 17 ~. 24
~ 12' ~ sa Æ
I---]l~ I 'z
~ u. 15.~
to-- ¡....-...:.- I
. 14 .. '-":"-
r----- ---!-- '
JI, 15. U r 10 I
~
c~~,.~ - -'.,~ ~
CO~ TA"F C( Ct1~~I~
2 I I ,75 At ¡ 4A I 3 I 2 I" 1
IA I
~. ~
- -:::--~ .~, :
---_..~-,~ "-
¡! II I
~
r-w-
5. 1 .
~
lilt 2 .
~~
~
~, 4 I
---.:...-.
~
. 5 I
----
21
S2 !
I,: ! I
-
INCIA TPwoo
.. ..
· I .. 1 I
------
, I ,f--
------J ~ 2 I
7'~
r--:--- . 3 .
~ e r ---:..-.
~
,_ ~ . I ~_ I I
...
ç~
~
- -
- - R" 1 E'ff
~ .<. ~. I.' i~~" ·
~
~1t
~..< ~~<v I
! .' 4~ , 7A ..
V ~~~ . I . &A
4 , , MIlO ¡-i5fW-
J4A ....., '!- 15A2
~ -. ...
.. . " -
I
·Y
SA'
A
'.M Ac
,
,
~'
,
,
7 ,
F
-----3------
~,
5
lJ
-~---
20
---=---
11 ..
. 1
..
- -
I
· I
S3
I
I .
12
,
-
2S
12
.
-
20
---:.-
22
IS
21 ,~
--'----
.
13
2J ~;
10 ~ ~ I) 7 ~
I ~ 23 cr
§~ . ,¡ I
I . d· 24 ~!
en
AND
~ICHl.. G
~
2R2
13,96 ,
5
u
'---
~I
. .
10-
25-
~
5
!
2e
,
25
15
-
..
.---.-;-----
ffi I 5
Þ-
UJ
(!)
-s
a:
~
c
Q
4
,
~
_ .07
- ,.. ~ "
1R3
1R2
~ ~ 78 .
.1
27
.
2e
---=---
--
.
r----
211
, I
, I
J "'--_.,
I
,
I
I
I
'lilt I
I I
I "'_
I ro--"
I ,~3. ,I.. · I , : : 2A
- ........1....- ~ I .u_ _ --!....-.. _ _
£~
.1 ~
J
I
SI I
~. - ~ --~\
,
\\{
~ I
-
,
TRACT SA
,
41 HE:AS
TRACT 2 - NOR 1 (
I
27'~
-
5
'I
J
-
21.
4
3
,.--, ,
I ~AI
I , ,,_,
I ,,-., I
I I I
I ,
I I
I I
~
I
-
21
-
JO
3
. 21 I. 2 .
~
. 30 ,-£.-.
17
- - ~-'- - - - --
1 3S I
2 I
4 "'__
3
~
,. --
32 I
!
-
BEOFORJ AD
---
- ----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Public Works
Strummer Drive Widening Project
Residential Acauisition
Lot 1, Block E, Richland Oaks Addition
_ Council Meeting Date: 7/26/93
Subject:
Agenda Number: PU 93-50
Staff has reached agreement with Jewel R. Higginbotham to purchase her home at 8217 Jerri Jo for
the Strummer Drive Widening Project.
The negotiated compensation is $ 73,500.00 plus relocation expenses. These expenses are moving
costs and closing costs on a replacement home. The exact amount of these expenses hasn't been
determined but should not exceed $ 5,000.00; Mrs. Higginbotham will be asked to provide a written
estimate of these costs.
The appraised value of the property is $70,000.00. Mrs. Higginbotham has found a replacement
home and has put in a contract for $73,500.00. Staff feels paying $3,500.00 over the appraised
value is a reasonable compromise.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of $ 73,500.00 payment to Jewel R. Higginbotham upon receipt of an
executed warranty deed for the subject property, plus verifiable relocation expenses.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Ot
Finance Review
Acct. Number 13-30-92-6000
Sufficient Funds Avai lable ..
, clrt1A~i± ' {[~VJU.~·~
( ~íl;f ;r V
, ftr/
City Manager
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
¡Ii
-
L~
~v
INI.
DGA
OGA
HAlf
OGA
DGA
KtIL
DGA
OGA
DGA
KWL
TCH
KWL
TCH
REV.
-"-9
2-13-91
'-1-91
8-2-91
8-20-91
11-20-91
12-31-91
1-15-92
1-22-92
2-21-92
3-'7-92
5-'-92
'-24-92
.
'f.
.. -
- - ðvlt." JÞ ....
i E~'" V"~,...,-tSfUA - -
nt.ltCI "'.... 2C,l.S ~ 1- ..........1- 1- I
~.. .. ....., -
I'" 1M 1~11~.....1"
., I., fR.
~ ~, ~ L.a
", ~ .. · - ")--1. .,
no 'C \, ~<v I ,.... .. f" o¡ ~.. I I
~<?~ .. . 7R ,.... .. } ~
G 'I..... 3· 17R"4 ;1fR~-
, ~ _ .. t a f .. "'! I
I --;-. _ J~ ~ ~ i
_ l~." . 4jì If', I I
~~~M ~I" . ~f-'; ;, :ï -----a------
',. '..
, I." ~
.. 2 .. 1M 'f' __- -, _ \ _
J l.J 'R I . I" _ IIR -..' IR I \J
. ~ ......... ~ --- --
I ~ u, _ ~RRIE ~ DR
~ ; f-~~'~. Il! I ':. ~'I ~'I ~~~ ~'I ~·I ~~
n\: " '----
~ ~ ~
'0 ~ .. '~ ~ ~' . ~ II ,~1 I
'Y-'W'
'"
1.
'~gll
~~D~
El.OO ~..
I TR.I._
e I ~ f3~"- t=- -- ..
....
~~~~
CO~
2 I
..
..
~~ro~ro
~ L."C~
~"L.
~ . W 'y E Y
5U~. 606
/4' ~
, ~,
"'1'
.
, ~
-
,. r
___ "
n ---:.-
---........ . ,
n f-.-.--
~
II
INCH A T~
. ~. ;,
f--r--
r . ,--:--
~~ I .
, ~
----- . J .
. r~
-----.
, ~., ~ ' ,
..
fA II'
I . " AC
IA
Ð'T
M
,
I !.
-
I "
,
.\~ ,
.., '\
~~ . ~ ~
I'~ J I '
. , 1
~ ----
~ I J.
-.:.-
I" . ·
~
~ ,
~
.
-----
7
----
· 2'0 ,
r-N- ---:-
- .. I' .,---.-, .
~ ----.; .
. 1.0. ~ ., ~ Œ
IIIII~(,:)~ , ~
II ! I' . ... 2.
---!' ~
5 12' >" >
~ :II -----. .. ~
. U. I"~
r- .---- ,
I U .. .~
--.-- -+-- .
~ I'. II I '0'
-:--
11 ,,1 . II! II 1 ,
~ - -
r-w-
I~ t .
Þ--=--
'''' I
~~
~
iI,. I
I!!;~
II' .
J.&-
1'1
"
JO
II I
Sf I
--
".
8EOFOFÐ FI)
- .e .Ñ~
C(C¡.lR~~
¡ U I I I I ". I
~~... ~ t"-
~~'t
-...-.- .. -.~ .
~.
2
I ~1i.L.~~=~:~ Y .ý'
_ NOATHEAS ¿At-iPU:
rt
.
'.11 "
,
.,
\
,
..
, .
.
~¡
.,
,
.
-
. - - - -:- - - -~ I I
~ " 1
.
-
o~K5 , : . I
NO. It t
¡ 17 , .0 11~~~ - - ~ - - .,.-.~- -
~. F\ .," ~A\t!>O . II .
, .. ,~- _ '.,
-~----
,t . u ,
20 U
" .2
---:.- ..
It , . , - -
. I I II I
.. 7
10 . -
---:...-
21 . ----:.- II f I
.
~
ø.
II
Z3 (~
to ~ ~ [0 7
. ~ 23. cr
§---"- . '11
· . ~. 2. ~:ñ
~ ,
AND
RICHL. G
-
!
f?R2
u. ,
.
..
---
~ I
. .
~
'I
! . .
to-
~ -
.. ~
ex
~
c ..
Q
17
--~-'------ . J
, -
25,
2'1
2'5
-
.
.
---¡;:--....-
,.---- -...
2'1'
---:.-.
.
, ,
, ,
I ,,-__,
,
,
,
,
r
I· I
, ,
I " _
~ ~ I ,.-_&
. · I · I 1M
I ,~~ I' I ,I I
.. 1- .. , ~ : ._
~:lß,~"
E,1 ~
I
I
~ -
,
TRACT SA
~ H~~5
i1
TIW:T I .~ ~oF1" (
"
--- -~
.
,., .~
~
21.
,.--., I
I ." I
I . ,,_,
, "-'.
I I .
I .
I .
. .
,
w'O'
. ...
l,ú·
tAl
. ~ 7' .
. ,
-
I
II " '~ 2 ,
---:.-.
I JO I~
. ,
. ,,--
,.--
.
I
.
--!...-.
II
I
--~,
,
\\!:
- ---.
--
-
-
-.
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
':1
,I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
,I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Public Works
Approve Bid for Sale of House at
4800 Nevada Trail
~ Council Meeting Date: 7/26/93
Agenda Number: PU 93-51
Subject:
The City purchased the house at 4800 Nevada Trail on March 25, 1992 for the Bedford-Euless Road
Widening Project. This house is far enough back from Bedford-Euless Road that it did not have to be
removed. The owner was paid $65,000.
The house has foundation problems and associated deficiencies. Two estimates were received on
the cost to repair the property in April, 1993, and the average estimate was $26.000 including
$10,'000 for foundation repairs.
Staff first advertised for bids on the property in 'November, 1992. with a $40.000 minimum, and no
bids were received. The property was again advertised for bids in its present condition requesting a
$35.000 minimum bid. The bid opening was July 20, 1993, and one bid was received with the
following options.
1 · Buy the property for $40.000 with the City first doing the foundation portion of the
repair work. The estimate for the foundation work is approximately $10,000.
2. Buy the property for $35,000 in its present "As-Is" condition.
Under either option, the bidder would like the City to finance the entire sale price for 1 0 years at
7.5%.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends City Council approve the sale of the property at 4800 Nevada Trail for $35.000 in
its present condition, to be paid in 1 0 years at 7.5 % interest.
Source of Funds:
Bonds· (GO/Rev~)
Operating Budget
Ot
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Suttie nt Funds Available
. Finance DIrector
ent Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Community Services Department
~ CDBG - Bursey Road Senior Adult Center
~ubject: Parking Lot Improvements
Council Meeting Date: 7-26-93
Agenda Number: PW 93-34
The attached report from Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. details and
tabulates the top three bids received for the 18th Year Community
Development Block Grant project for the City of North Richland Hills. The
Bursey Road Senior Adult Center Parking Lot Improvements project was
approved for federal funding by HUD and bids were received on July 7, 1993.
The project was bid with a deduct alternate for a portion of the parking
lot, since cost estimates of construction exceeded the 18th Year funds.
The Tarrant County Mayor's Council previously selected the Bursey Road
Senior Adult Center parking lot improvements as two separate projects using
the 18th and 19th Year Community Development Block Grant funds.
For the past several months the City has been waiting for approval from HUD
üto combine the 18th and 19th Year funds for use in one single project to
save construction and administrative costs. According to HUD, the 19th
Year funds are now available and a portion of these funds can be combined
with the 18th Year funds to construct the western portion of the parking
lot without the deduct alternate. The remainder of the 19th Year funds
should be available for the additional improvements at the Bursey Road
Senior Adult Center site to be bid later this year.
'e federal contribution of funds for construction of this project is
5,400 for the 18th Year and $92,900 for the 19th Year.
Based on the attached tabulation of bids, the Staff recommends award of the
contract to the low bidder, Walt Williams Construction Inc., for the base
bid of $102,231.20. The available balance of the 19th Year funds will be
used ~or the remainder of the parking lot improvements in front of the
cente!r.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that City Council recommend to the Tarrant County
Commissioner's Court the award of this contract to the low bidder,
Walt Williams Construction, Inc. for the base bid of $102,231.20.
Attachment: KEF Transmittal Letter
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
~perating Budget _
~the~~ _
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
City Manager
Page 1 of
I'
I"
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
July 23, 1'9-93
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: 30-333, TARRANT/CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
BUR..5EY ROAD SENIOR ADULT CENTER,
PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS,
TC PROJECT NO. B92-UC-48-0001-48-05,
TABULAT/OiY OF BIDS (REVISTON NO.2)
The Tarrant County Mayors' Council previously selected the referenced project as the 18th
& 19th Year ComlTIunity Developnlent Block Grant (CDBG) projects for ,the city of North
Richland Hills, a city melTIber of the Tarrant County COffiJnunity Developlnent Consortium.
For the past several ITIonths the city has been waiting for approval from HUD to cOlllbine the
18th and 19th year funds for use in one single project to save construction and administrative
costs. Since there was a delay in receiving HUD's approval, the city requested to bid only
the 18th year C.D.B.G. project as soon as possible. Bids were received on July 7, 1993 for
the 18th year C.D.B.G. project only.
We understand that 19th Year Funds are now available, and a portion of these funds can be
conlbined with the 18th Year Funds to construct the full 18th Year Project (Base Bid). The
remainder of the 19th Year Funds would still be available for the City's proposed 19th Year
Project, which includes additional inlprovements at the Bursey Road Senior Adult Center Site
to be bid later this year.
This project's contract proposal is organized into categories of Base Bid and an
Alternate Bid. The following is a general description of the improvements included in each
category.
BASE BID:
This inlprovelllent includes constructing the whole parking lot west of the Senior
Adult Center in the acre of land recently acquired by the city. 18th Year Funds alone
are. not sufticient to construct the whole parking lot planned. Additional 19th Year
Funds, which are now available, will be required to constnlct the Base Bid Project.
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO 817/267-3367 . FAX 817/354-4389
I
I' aJ'age 2, July 23, 1993
-Honorable Mayor alld City COllllCil
30-333, Bursey Road Senior Adult Center Parking Lot/mprovements, Tabulation of Bids
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A L TERN A TE BID:·~··
This improvement includes deducting the north end of the parking lot pavement,
Concrete Paving Deduct, from the Base Bid in lieu of constructing the whole parking
lot. This alternate was provided in the evenç. that 19th Year Funds would not be
available in time to supplement the 18th Year Funds. Bids were received from a total
of five (5) contractors. The following is a summary of the three lowest bids for the
Base Bid and Alternate Bid. This sumIllary also includes the engineer's estimate.
TOT AL BASE BID $102,231.20 $110,216.90 $113,062.50 $99,042.60
(Items IC through I6C)
CONCRETE PAVING DEDUCT (NO BID) (44,760.90) ( 46, 181.00) (39,878.25)
OT AL ALTERN ATE BID $102,231.20 $65,456.00 $66,881.50 $59,164.35
ase Bid minus Concrete Paving
Deduct)
The major difference in the above amounts estimated by the Engineer and those bid by the
Contractors is reflected in the unit price for Bid Item No. 1C, Unclassified Excavation. A
detailed Engineer's estimate and bid tabulation showing the amount bid for each pay item in
the Base Bid and Alternate Bid is enclosed for your review. The Engineer's estimated unit
price does not include excavating and salvaging the flexible base recently placed at the
proposed site by the Parks and Recreation Department for temporary parking for the Senior
Adults.
A comparison of the detailed Engineer's estimate tabulation with the detailed bid tabulation,
attached, reveals that the Engineer's estimate for most of the unit prices bid for each
individual construction pay item are within the range of prices bid by all five contractors,
even though the combined total bids by each contractor are above the combined Engineer's
estimate total. Only the estilllated prices for excavation, as noted above, and hydromulch are
below all of the bidders prices.
The County's Commissioners Court will award this project based on the City's
recommendation of award and request for supplemental 19th year funding. The federal
I contribution of funds for the 18th Year project is $63,000.00, and the available 18th Year
_ funds for construction, minus the engineering fee of $7,600.00, is $55,400.00. The 19th
_ Year funds now available total $101,000, which include $8,100 for engineering and $92,900
I
I
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 3, Jllly 23, 1993
Honorable Mayor and City Council
30-333, Bursey Roal/ Senior At/lilt Celzter Parkilzg Lot Improvements, Tablllation of Bids
1:,-: ...
for construction. The total funds available for construction by combining the 18th and 19th
Year amouñts would be $148,300.
The following is a list of the amount of 18th Year and 19th Year funds required for the three
lowest bidders:
Lowest Bidder
Walt Williams Const;., Inc.
18th Year Funds
19th Year Funds Needed
Second Lowest Bidder
JRJ Paving, Inc.
18th Year Funds
19th Year Funds Needed
Third Lowest Bidder
Dyer Materials, Inc.
18th Year Funds
19th Year Funds Needed
I BASE BID ALTERNATE BID
$102,231 20 NO BID
(55,400.00) (55,400.00)
·J·:::J:..~~;~!~.~~·~·:i!g2J::::::J·:"·:::!·:·¡:!.!:!¡·:¡·::!::.~I:~~:I~:m¡:~il:¡::::!::!¡::::!:lj:::·:
$110,216.90 $65,456.00
(55,400.00) (55,400.00)
·::::;!:!~~.i·~!~.î!~·~~~!:¡!!::¡HJJ:::¡·:J::¡:¡!::::¡:¡J::!·~!~Î~:II~¡~:~!:¡:¡¡:¡¡:!::¡¡:!:!:::¡:::!::
$113,062.50 $66,881.50
(55,400.00) (55,400.00)
;;::::::;:::~~i:~I~:~~º::::.::¡::: ·:;::::::¡¡:::::::¡:¡:::i:::~:î:I:f.~~~:ffi!~g:::!!!:::::::¡::::::::::
As shown above, Walt Williams Construction, Inc. is the low bidder for the Base Bid in the
amount of $102,231.20, and JRJ Paving, Inc. is the low bidder for the Alternate Bid in the
amount of $65,456.00.
We would recolnnlend t.hat the Base Bid Contract be awarded t.o the lo\v bidder, Walt
Williams, Inc., P.O. Box 4620, Fort Worth, Texas 76164, in the amount of $102,231.20.
Funding for this amount \vould include $55,400 from the 18t.h Year Funds, and an
additional $46,831.20 from 19th Year Funds. The remaining 19th Year Funds. which total
$54.168.80. would be used to construct additional proposed improvements at the Bursey
Road Senior Citizens site under separate contract to be bid later this year.
We will be present at the July 26, 1993, Council Meeting to answer any questions you may
have concerning this project.
I:
I "~age 4, July 23, 1993
~onorable Mayor alzd City COllncil
I 30-333, Bursey Road Senior Adult Center Parking Lot/nzprovements,
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Tablllatžon of Bids
,
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RW A/ra
Enclosure
xc:
Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. C.A. Sanford, Deputy City Manager
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works/Utilities
Mr. Larry Cunningham, Director of Finance
Mr. Jim Browne, Director of ConllTIunity Services
Ms. Patricia Ward, COITImunity Developnlent Coordinator (Tarrant County)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
,i~
r .
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Public Works
Council Meeting Date: 7/26/93
Subject:
ArrrOVA ~()ntr;:l~t for A~rh;:llt Milling
Agenda Number: PW 93-35
As a part of the City's annual asphalt overlay program, the Public Works Department wants to mill
the first six feet of pavement adjacent to the lip of the gutter on both sides of the street. The milling
process removes approximately 3/4 inch to 1 inch of asphalt at the gutter edge. This allows the
asphalt overlay to be laid down to meet the gutter grade instead of being 3/4 inch too high. This will
provide a more stable edge for the overlay and will help keep the edge from peeling off.
The City of Hurst took public bids in May for their annual milling program. The low bidder was
Dustrol, Inc. Their bid of $0.75 per linear foot is a reasonable bid in staff's opinion. We have
received a quote from the same contractor, Dustrol, Inc., to do our 15,000 linear feet for the same
unit price. The total cost would be $11 ,250.
In order to expedite the process of public bidding, staff would like to contract with Dustrol, Inc., at
the same unit price as the City of Hurst and proceed with construction.
Fundina Source:
The Public· Works Department will utilize its 1992/93 Operating Budget funds to pay for this milling
operation.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends Council approve the City Manager contracting with Dustrol, Inc., for $11,250 of
asphalt wedge milling.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds ("GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
. Finance Director
~
ent Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
A~P)4t}~T ¡)JÞOGE- /rl¡ L¿I 1J6 P~5
~
--
I I J
\Ø -0
wec<;re:. M\&..A-.I ¡j ~
DI/~
~ ~Jlfø I'(~
eµ~11 ~<;
ev~ t:f
~1
1,,1,1-
I
I-
I P. O. BOX 1738
ROANOKE, TEXAS 76262
I
I
I
ATTN: Mr. Jimmy Cates - Public Works Department
IRe:
I Quanti ties and Prices:
I Item :#
1
Ie
I
I
I
I
This proposal includes 1 move-in.
I We have estimated the work will require approximately 2 working days.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact
I either myself or Maurice Sefcik.
I Sincerely,
I Danny Simpson
General Manager
I
DUSTROL INC.
(817) 430-3958 (METRO
(817) 491-2354 (FAX
PROPOSAL
Date: 6-29-93
To:
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas
76182
Milling @ Various Locations in the City of North Richland Hills
Description
.Approx.
Quantit~l
Extension
Curbline Milling
(0 to 3/4ft @ 6'-Oft).. 15,000.00 LF
@ $
0.75 per LF
= $
11,250.0C
TOTAL:
$
11,250.0C
"X"
DENOTES SERVICES PROVIDED:
x
X
Milling
Loading
Trucking & Disposal
Temporary Stripe
Sweeping & Cleaning
Detail & Handwork
Lane Closures
Stockpile Maintenance
Bond & AGC Dues
Water
Heat
Scarify
Compaction
Engineerin~
x
The above unit price is the same as quoted to the City of Hurst for their
1993 Street Wedge Milling Program (Project 93-113-ST). Dustrol agrees to honor
that price and hold it firm for the City of North Richland Hills.
Accepted:
By:
Title:
Date:
I
I- City SPECIFICATIONS AND
of CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
I Hurst for the construction of
I
I 1993 STREET WEDGE
MILLING PROGRAM
I
I
I
I
Ie PUBLIC WORKS DePARTMENT ·
ENGINEERING DIVISION
I Project No. 93-113-ST May 1993
I MAYOR
Bill Souder
I COUNCILMEMBERS
Jimmy McKenzie, Mayor Pro- Tem
I Charles Swearengen
Vlvagene Copeland
Anna Holzer
I Henry WI/son
Ralph Bryan
I Hurst, Texas
CITY MANAGER: Jim Starr.
I IIA Quality
of
I- Life City" PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: Ron Haynes, P.E.
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
Total Amount at This Bid is
-rWeh/& ~OU.saNJ , ~ve~ ,^L".J~( ~ver\+1" ~ì\Je
I
Dollars
and ~O
($ I z., 315. ~
Cents.
In compliance with State Legislature. House Bill 11, the charges on Project 93-113-ST are separated in
the fonowing manner:
Materials: S
Services: $
TOTAL: $
ð. ~
-LI!!.~
, Z. 1 r;;7.
IZ, 31S. ~
Respectfully submitted,
JJu.:*r 6l, :G" (... ·
Company Name (please print)
By: Da~.,>, StM~N
ate 1
Signatur
rltle:..Àr-eet Qr-
(please print)
1'.0. ßCK ';'3ð
( \ t bA \Ai. s-l- 514.., fA )
Street Address
~~",lu 1"5l
City State
(Sf-1- ) ~~ð ., ~~5ß
~"Zøz.
Zip
Phone Number
SEAL if Bidder is a Corporation
Date:
5 .. II.. <]~
2
I
~.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
ITEM APPROX.
NO. aUANTlrf
Attachment -8-
PROPOSAL
PROJECT NO. 93-113-ST
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
BID
1. 12.500 LF.
2. 4,000 LF.
Furnish Labor and Equipment
to Wedge Mill O· to 3/4' Deep &
6' Wide, Complete in Place tor
ÑÞ
Dotlars
and 5av0\7- -Ci'l/e, Cents per LF.
Furnish Labor and Equipment
to Wedge Milia· to l' Deep &
6' Wide, Complete in Place for
~,
Dollars
and ~\Á".{.~. .Ç'''E Cents per LF.
,
$
l>72
s
o.1-~
~
$ 93~5.
~
$ :3,tiiJ.
IZ,3ð.!!!-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
Peat Marwick
Management Consultants
Focused experience
for measurable results
Manufacturing and
Technology Industries
Financial Institutions
Health Care
Government Services
Insurance
Real Estate and Hospitality
Airports
Retail and Wholesale
Education
Energy and Utilities
Corporate Transactions
Technology and Operations
Compensation and Benefits
City of North Richland Hills
Parks and Recreation Facilities
Development Corporation
INDIRECT COST ANALYSIS
Final Report
July 22, 1993
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I'
lì
I
I
,
I
Peat Marwick
Management Consultants
200 Crescent Cou rt
Suite 300
Dallas, TX 75201-1885
Telephone 214 754 2000
Telefax 214 754 2297
July 22, 1993
Mr. Larry Cunningham
Director of Finance
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N .B. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Dear Mr. Cunningham:
This letter summarizes the results of our work concerning the indirect cost analysis
perfonned for the City of North Richland Hills. The approach used in conducting the
review is outlined in our proposal dated September 8, 1992. This report concludes the
activities outlined in that proposal.
STUDY OBJECTIVES
The City of North Richland Hills recently initiated a 1/2C increase in the sales tax to fund
park projects. The creation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities Development Cotporation
places additional burden on the Parks and Recreation Department and the City's General
Fund. Other city departments (i.e. City Council, City Manager, Finance, Legal, etc.)
provide services to the Parks and Recreation Facilities Development CotpOration day to day
operations. In this study, we developed a methodology for applying indirect costs to park
and recreation projects fmanced under SB 376 and detennined the rate using 1992-93 Fiscal
Year budget figures.
FINDINGS
The City allocates General Fund costs to both Water Utilities and the Parks and Recreation
Facilities Development COtpOration. In a memorandum from Jim Browne, Director of Parks
and Recreation to Rodger N. Line, City Manager dated August 13, 1992, the Parks and
Recreation Facilities Development COIporation set the administrative fee for Fiscal Year
Member Firm of
Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler
I
I
I
I
Ii
I
,
.
I
I
I
I
1
'I
IJ
t
I
_Peat Marwick
Mr. Larry Cunningham
Page 2
1992-93 equal to 10% of the estimated sales tax revenues ($193,600). Since there was no
substantiation for the 10% figure, it was never adopted and implemented. To date, the only
contribution to the General Fund from the Parks and Recreation Facilities Development
Corporation is an amount equal to $159,740, which is the salary differential due to the
reorganization of the Community Services Department.
Based on our review of the City's cost allocation process, the following fmdings were noted:
· Currently, the only contribution to the General Fund from the Parks and Recreation
Facilities Development COIporation is an amount equal to $159,740. This amount is the
difference in the cost of salaries due to the reorganization of Community Services.
· Four new positions were created as a result of the creation of the Parks and Recreation
Facilities Development COIporation. The titles of these positions are Park and Public
Grounds Manager, Assistant Recreation Superintendent, Recreation Maintenance
Worker, and Recreation Clerk.
· The administrative fee allocated to the Parks and Recreation Facilities Development
Corporation is calculated using only the estimated sales tax revenues and does not include
the revenues from Park and Recreation Operations and Interest Income.
· There are no other direct charges assessed against the Parks and Recreation Facilities
Development COIporation other than the salary differential.
RECOMMENDATIONS
· Adopt the allocation methodology outlined in Tab 1 for charging indirect costs to the
Parks and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation. This method includes all
departments that provide benefit to the Parks and Recreation Facilities Development
COIporation and utilizes equivalent values to more accurately assess indirect costs.
· Adopt the rate of $335,576 for indirect costs chargeable to the Parks and Recreation
Facilities Development Corporation. This amount includes $208,013, which is directly
tied to the Parks and Recreation department, and $127,563, which represents 0.29% of
the total City budget, for costs associated with services provided by other City
departments. Tab 2 contains the output from the Indirect Cost Analysis Model.
· Document and strengthen the procedures for recording direct charges so that they are
unifonn throughout the City. Time sheets and automated work order systems can be
utilized to develop cost data which can be used in developing more accurate allocations
or for calculating costs that can be directly charged back at the end of the year.
· The Indirect Cost Model should be utilized for an interim period until the necessary
organizational changes are in place that will allow for a more accurate and equitable
method of cost allocation for services provided to the Parks and Recreation Facilities
Development COIporation.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
,I
I
I
I
I¡
I
I
,
I
~Peat Marwick
Mr. Larry Cunningham
Page 3
. Operate the allocation model provided on an annual basis to support the indirect cost
allocation. Make modifications to the model to reflect changes in costs identified as
indirect that are changed to direct and changes in organizational structure. Additions to
the model might include new programs for Park Development CotpOration sites that
utilize GenelëÙ Fund resources (i.e. O~~_ ~n new park properties).
********
We appreciate the assistance provided by you and your staff during the conduct of this study.
We are pleased to answer any questions you may have about this report.
Very truly yours,
/<P/Vl ~ ~J (Jt/JÄ{qt~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I)
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
City of North Richland Hills
Parks and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation
Indirect Cost Analysis
Table of Contents
1 Methodology for Allocation of Indirect Costs
2 Output from the Indirect Cost Analysis Model
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
City of North RichIand Hills
Parks and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation
Indirect Cost Analysis
Table of Contents
[] Methodology for Allocation of Indirect Costs
2 Output from the Indirect Cost Analysis Model
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
Department/Division
Providing Service
City Council
City Manager
City Secretary
Legal
Civil Service
Finance
Management Infonnation
Systems
Public Works
Parks & Recreation
Non-Departmental
Management Services
Self-Insurance Fund
Planning
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Methodology for Allocation of Indirect Costs
Method of Allocation
Percent of budget (3.49 % )
Percent of budget (3.49%)
Percent of budget (3.49 % )
Percent of budget (3.49 % )
Percent of Staff (0.98%)
Percent of budget (3.49%)
Estimated utilization (See the Computer Infonnation
and Telephone Infonnation worksheets in Tab 2) was
used for the Data Processing / Telephones Division
and percent of utilization (15.00% -- Estimated by
CitiCable Division) was used for the CitiCable
Division
Percent of budget (3.49 % )
Percent of salaries (See Direct Personnel Cost
worksheet in Tab 2)
Percent of budget (3.49%)
Percent of budget (3.49%) was used for
Administration and estimated utilization (See the
Property Infonnation and Vehicle Infonnation
worksheets in Tab 2) was used for the Building and
Vehicle Maintenance Divisions
Percent of Budget (3.49 % )
Percent of Budget (3.49 % )
Note: The 3.49 % cost allocation factor for Percent of Budget was derived by dividing the
total budget for the Parks COIporation by the total City budget. The Percent of Staff factor
(0.98%) was computed by dividing 4 by the total number of City employees.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{'
I
City of North RichIand Hills
Parks and Recreation Facilities Development Corporation
Indirect Cost Analysis
Table of Contents
1 Methodology for Allocation of Indirect Costs
[!] Output from the Indirect Cost Analysis Model
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
fiI}
....
....
==
-c fiI}
= .-
.! ~
-5=
¡~
I ~~
\('z~
c.. CJ
= ~
è:8
ö~
I
=
=
.-
!d
-
=
c..
-
=
U
...
=
~
a
c..
=
......
~
~
~
Q
~
.-
...
.-
......
.-
CJ
rf
=
= ......
.- ~
!d'=
OJ =
b ~ t'
~~I
= rIJ
= "tc
~ .~ j
-'=.s
,...=. =...
..... þIIIII4 <
"t:j = ~
d) 0 ~
-.Þ -.Þ ..;::: q
U1 U1 «t 00
~ 0 8 0
co U ...... M
ðJ <~
B
. ....
i
~ ~
!~
tJ~
....
~~
Q~
~
\0
"l
t'
M
~
~
-.Þ
Ð Ð
COco
"O'C
= =
~~
e-~
o . ....
Uu
U1......
~~s
fI} «t 0
=~~
tJf.t-4f.t-4
.... 0 0
t~~
.- t' 0'\
~~M
.soöo
~
V')
M
00
M
0\
.........
N
~
t'
\0
t'
"l
V")
~
('f'\
~
=
.2
]
~
E-
~
~
e
e
=
00
=
o
. ....c
.,.;
~
o
o
~
~
~
00
Q..
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
~
-
-
=
-= ~
= ....
I =~
:æ~
c.J =
æ~
I ~ i
I'~~
c.. c.J
e ~
è:a
Ü~
I
=
=
.-
td
...
=
~
..
=
U
~
=
~
e
~
=
...
~
t
Q
æ
.-
~
.-
...
.-
CJ
~
=
= ...
.- ~
td'C
~ =
t ~
~ ~ .:l
~ ! ~
~ U ~
ã 't ~
~ ~.9
~ .= 5
"''C.s
If ~ =<
d
·ß §
~J
t œ
.s ·5
O~
œ
. .-.4
œ
as
~
~
..-.4
.w
as .w ::::
8 5 s
~e(/)
~'()
.wi
5~
e =
~~
o
~ ~.w
~ .> ~
M ..-.4 ~
0\ .w =
~<~
'3
~ 5 G)
Me~
~ i~
co
Q
\I") M 00 \0 ~ 0\
f' \I") M \0 f' 0
\I") 00 ~ ~ M ~'"
M'" 0'" 00 ~ ~ ...-I
~ ...-I ~ ~ M
~ ~
§
J
.w
d
=
J
~
f'
M
~
~
00
0\
o
§
ª
<
\I") M 00 \0 0\
f' \I") M \0 0
\I") 00 ~ ~ ~
Ñ ò 00 ~ ...-I
~ ...-I ~ ~ M
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
M ~ ~ f' \0 M \I")
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ò .,.) ~ r-: Ñ 0\
f' ...-I ~ ...-I M ...-I 0\
~ ~ M ...-I ~ \0 ~
~~~ ~~
.:l
=
I ~
ë-= ~
Q g ~
." = ~
~ 0 oW-
.. U U
s~
~ . .-.4
~u
! 8
2 ·E
~ ~
(I) "¡ __
~ co .>
Ö ~ Ö
.w
co
Z
0\\1")
~i
~ f''''
~ ...-I
~
0\\1")
~i
~r-:
~ ...-I
~
~8
U";
...-I
ooM
\00
"lr-:
...-I 00
\0...-1
M...-I
~~
co
o
~
.5
~
œ
co
§
..:::=
ä rr
co--
1;;~
~---
~ ~
~ li
... co
5 8 co
~~~
~S~
;iou
~
...
co
Z
0\1")
f'f'
0\...-1
cê ~'"
~~
~~
0\0\
~~
~ ~
~~
\0 ~
'¿O\
\I") ...-I
M...-I
~~
...-I
M
"l
f'
00
~
...-I
~
.~
...
~
.w
œ
·a
~ .=
·C =
ß~
.8 œ
.a i~
~ œ ~
~ .~ 0
... . .-.4
.S:1 S :õ
Zsæ
æ
o \I") 0
f'f' ~
0\...-1 0",
00'" ~ \I")
~ ~ 0\
...-I
~
...-If'O\O\O\O\
OOO\O\O\O\~
~O\O\Of'\I")
~Ñ~~o\~'"
~ ...-I ~
~
~
0",
\I")
0\
...-I
~
~
U
...-I f'0\ 0'\0\ 0\
OOO\O\O\O\~
~O\O\Of'\I")
~Ñ~~o\~
~ ...-I ~
~
~~~~~~
0\0\0\0\0\0\
~~~~~~
~~~~~~
~§§§~~
o"'òòò'¿o\
...-I\OMM\OM
~~~~\I")...-I
~~
\I") \0
M M
"l ~
...-I ~
o ~
~ 0",
...-I ...-I
~ ~
=
.sa
!
~
~
~
œ
~
as
Øe4
co
8 ~ 8
~ 51 ~
= c ii
œ ~ d
~ ~~
'3 ... ..-.4 œ
= 5=ta
Š e ~ ·õ
t: ~~e
as--,,=o
~ ~ ¡:= .~
Q co G) --
I d Ð ~
5;:JO~
z
co
o
~
5
.~
~::s ~
.a co 5
~.8 .s
O~.w
:.= .= =
£~8
~ 5 S
~~~
~ co
ß ~ ~
~ fä ~
~~~
e .w ...
tJJ Go) Go)
~~~
-.-.4 = =
U~~
~
tr)
~
00
~
0"1
---
N
N
.........
t'
CI1
~
CI1
o
U
~
=
o
.~
o
o
~
~
~
oò
~I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
~
-
-
==
-= ~
= .-
= ~
:æ~
.~ ~
~<
I ~~
f~~
= ~
è:6
ü~
I
I
=
=
.-
!d
1.4
=
~
1.4
=
U
~
=
~
e
~
=
~
~
t
Q
fI.2
~
.-
~
.-
~
.-
CJ
r:
=
= ~
.- ~
!d'C
~ =
t ~
~ ~ Zl
~ ! ~
'C U U
= ~
= t$ =
rIJ ~.i
~ .= '5
1.4'C.s
~ ~:<
=
.sa =
...., =
]J
;(
~ fIJ
.s ·i
O~
fIJ
·i
~
~
.~
1ii....,:t::
8 iš s
~ ~ VJ
~t>
...., in
5.-0
~ =
~~
o
~ ~....,
0.' .> ~
N .~ "0
0\ ...., =
~<~
'3
~ iš Ð
Me~
0\ 1: =
~ = ~
~
Q
~N~
NNN
V') 00 V')
~v)~
~~~
....,
=
=
J
N~
NN
00 V')
v)~
~~
~~
uu
§
J
J
~
N
"l
t"
~
~
0\
~
('f"\
00\00\
~O\\O
N~O\
\1"')" ~ ~
~\ON
Nt"~
~~...:
~
~
00
~
8
~
N"
~
G)
{I} (,)
8 Ð ¡
·E = ~ iš
~ .~ 5 =
...., e ...., .;
= ...., .~ ~
~,,:ª ~ ~
~e co;.a
~:9~ G)
=~ø:i>
~
~
0\
t":
V')
~
o
ri
~
"0
§
~
G)
(,)
!Ð
~ ~
= 0
Þ-I {I}
~ Ð
ÐØ-.
VJ
~
o
~
~
~
~
o
~
~..
~
~
0\
~
~
~
t"
0..
~
N
~
~
~
o
~
ri
~
V')
~
fIJ
Ð
(,)
·E
Ð
VJ
=
.sa
I
fIJ
=
Þ-I
~ CO
.~ .¡
is:
s:
~
V')
~
~
~
~
V')
~
~
~
~
0\
~
~
N
~
00
00
0\
~
000\0000
~OO\OV')~
NO\O\OO\
~..~ôôo\
~V')\OO\O
~t"~\ON
~~~~~
~~
{I}
G)
(,)
~ .~
CU 1: VJ
18 1
cu t; a
Q .e. ~ =
t ·ä e .§ 8
-==..c>=2
õ~;:]~£ti:
N
00
~..
N
V')
\0
0\
~
~
~
GfJ
o
."
=
r:
ë
r!
S
=
E-c
~
"1
~
öO
~
0\
""
N
N
""
t'
t"
~
\0
N
0\..
~
~
0\
00
~
00
t"
"l
~
N
~
fIJ
5
~
i
~
Ð
(,)
]
~
Q
~
=
~
:a
æ
a.
~
~
."
=
=
~
5
~
s
=
E-c
~
en
o
U
~
o
c::
.s
.....
~
o
.!3
:(
~
~
00
Ø-.
U
~
........
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
fI'j
--
~
-= fI'j
= .-
= fI'j
:æb
y =
=~
I ~i
f~~
c.. y
e ~
~:6
ö~
I
=
=
.-
!d
'-
=
Q..
'-
=
u
~
=
~
e
Q..
=
....
~
~
~
Q
~
.-
~
.-
....
.-
CJ
r:
=
= ....
.- ~
!d~
~ =
t :a
~ ~ J!l
~ ! ~
'C U ~
; ~ ~
~ ~.5:
~ .= '5
'-'C.s
~ ~:<
= .w
.g =
.w =
jJ
;(
t rn
.s ·5
O~
.~
rn
œ
~
~
......
.w
œ.w:::::
8 5 s
~ ~ U.)
~'O
.wi
5"0
~ =
~E
o
~ þ.w
~ .> ~
N · ..... "0
0\ .w =
~<~
'3
~ 5 G)
Ne~
~ '[Æ
Q,)
o
§
J
§
J
§
J
0\§...-4...-40V')
0\ t'--V')~...-4
00 \ONOO\
N'" ..¿ ô N'" ..: ~
00 0\ \0 \0 t'--oo
...-4 ~ N t'-- ~ ...-4
~ ~..: r-:
~ ...-4
~
"0 ]
= =
æ ~
~ .~
] U]êd
~] þ~.~
~~s Q,) ~"O
w .w~>=
6~t2=.s=
..= 0 ..... 0 ~
O·'=~Uãš~
e ~ Q,) ~ .~ .....
oo5o~$
ø:oooV):J
I
~
~
,...¡
~
ë-
=
u
...
53
e
c..
=
-æ
~
~
=
~
tf
~
V')
('f")
QO
\C
to--
~
II)
ff')
~
,
~
~
a
('f")
0\
...........
N
N
...........
t'--
~
~
ra
~
a
,...¡
~
II)
II)
,...¡
oê
C\
\C
;..
~
~
=
:=
~
=
.5:
]
<
]
=
E-
tI.)
.....
tI.)
o
U
~
o
=
.9
.....
~
o
..E
<
~
R
QO
~I
I
....
<
]
=
E-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Wj
-
-
i
-= Wj
= .-
= ~
=5.
~~
I ~i
('~~
... y
<:> ~
c:6
ü~
I
=
=
.-
~
=
-
=
~
-
=
u
~
=
~
E
~
=
......
~
t
Q
fI.2
~
.-
~
.-
......
.-
CJ
r:
=
= ......
.- ~
=~
~ <=
b ~ =
~ ~ =
== ! ~
'C U ë
a ~ J:
~ ~ ~
"f:a~
If ~ ~
U)
6 ]
o C+-4 ::s
,,~ 0 tI.c
~ ~
(f')S
~ fš '\)
~e~
~~~
~
Q
i
~
~
~]
6
~u
.s~
~ . ....
Q::U
~
\0
....
o
N
00
~
(f')
r--
~
N
~
r--
~
V')
N
~
fñ ~
... ÞO
fš =
e ~
tj~
.ª, ~
~ .....
<u
N~
O\(f')
r-- V')
v)'ô
V') ....
~ (f')
~
~
0\
\0
o
~
(f')
V')
o
~
~
~
V')
(f')
N
~
...
t)
ÞO
=
~
~
~
u
...
t)
:z
.~ =
8 i .g
..... E 6
BE,*~
e .ª ~
Ji Os ~ ~
.~~æ~
U
~
V')
N
o
r--
r--
~..
(f')
....
....
~
~
s
~
\0
o
o
\0
\0
00
r-:
N
~
....
(f')
o
~
\0
V')
~
t)
o
.~
~
...
.~ :å
e ÞO ~
tj .8 U
·S ~ ~
8 ·ë "5 b
oª ~ æ ð
tI.c
......
.>
U
.... N
....~
\0\0
(f')" M
~....
~ \0
~
U) ...
6 ~ t)
e ~ 0
... ~ ~
~ ~.8
:.e' .-=: . tI.c
< ~ t)
::>:z
~
r--
~
~
V)
M
00
M
0\
.........
N
~
t'
~
0\
00
o
V')
N
0\
0\"
0\
(f')
~
6
t)
...
U)
£
~
=
~
6
a
t)
ÞO
=
~
~
~
~
.....
(1)
bO
"0
::s
~
~
~
00
~I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
~
....
....
i
-= ~
= .-
«: ~
~=
¡~
I ~ i
f~~
c... CJ
o ~
è:6
ü~
I
I
=
=
.-
!d
a..
=
c..
a..
=
U
~
=
~
a
c..
=
........
~
t
Q
fIJ
~
.-
~
.-
........
.-
CJ
~
=
= ........
.- ~
!d~
~ =
b :?J =
~ ~ .g
~ !!d
~ U Ë
§ 1j !
~ f t$
a..:a~
~ ~ t5
fIJ
5 ]
o~~
1\~
~ ~
(f1S.w
~ 5 II)
M e ~=
~i=
~
Q
~
0\
\0
~
~~~~~~~~
f""'.~0\ (f10\00(f1
O\M\OOO(f1~~(f1
o~~o~or--:~
~
V)
M
"l
~
~
~
~
~~OO\~OOOO\O
M~~8~~;:~
~ Ñ 'Ii 0" r-: r£ 0\ (f1"
~~~~~\O~~
~~~~..:~~..:
~~~~
=
.s
~
~
ø=:
~
fIJ
~
~
fIJ
II)
o
] ~
§ 8
f"'J .':: · E
i ~ & ~
~6] SfIJ
~u~ 5~
~ ~ .~~ ~ ~ ~
t·8 f! .= :=
~ = ..c >..c
~::Eø:::1~æ
S
5
e
~
=
~
II) Q
.~ e =
;f1i:~
~
00
\0
~
(f1
00
~
8"
V)
v;
~
~
fIJ
2
S
=a
i
Þ<
L1J
::E
~
o
~
=
~
5
CJ
S
~
~
00
f""'.
00
f""'.
~
\0
M
~
(f1
~
i
~
~
·5
::t
l
~
.~
e
~
....
~
~
~
\0
~
(f1
~
~~~~~~~
ooOO~\O
~f""'.MV)V)O\~
o~o~o~o
V)
~
~
\0
M
~
0\
~
~
0\(f1§~~~0
0\00 0\t"-V)(f1
00(f1 f""'.\OMO
Ñ'Ii'liv)'ôÑ":
OOOO\~\O\Of""'.
~~~OMf""'.~
~Ñ Ñ~":
~ ~ ~
fIJ
e
s
.....
~
5
~
~
~
=
~
]
II)
is
CJ
3
~
] I
fIJ rf
8 ~ ~
] ·E u ] .¡
rf~]lI)þ~·~
~ !:S 0 · .... fIJ
"iš ~ c.¡;;. c := II) II)
=lI)e~è!5~~
.s ~;! ~ 6 ~
o ~..§ = t4U(;
e~Cd~II)~
~ ã § ~ 6 õ .~
~::EQ(I)CJCJ~
~
V)
c;:
00
M
0\
"'"
N
~
t'
~
þeooo4
i
~
::s
a.1
~
~
00
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
-
-
=
-= f'-a
= .-
= f'-a
- ~
.c -
.~ ~
~<
I 'Ëi
f~~
- y
(:) ~
è:6
üJS
I
==
=
.-
!d
..
=
~
...
=
U
~
==
~
e
~
=
...
~
t
Q
fIj
~
.-
~
.-
...
.-
CJ
r:
==
= ...
.- ~
~"C
= =
b :a c
~ ! ¡
"C U Ë
§ 1i i
~ .= 1$
""C~
,f == =
..... ..... =
en
5 ]
o~£
I\~
~ ~
~S.w
~ 5 Ð
~ e ~
~ii
fr
Q
§
Ñ
\0
"l
,...-4
~
.~
.w
e
~
o
u
5
e
~
1)
i)
Q
en
~
ø.c
~
0\
~
~
co
,...-4
~
~
co
C'i
t'
,...-4
~
,....... ,-.
N,...-4
0\,...-4
t'\O
V)-- ~
V)~
~~
'-" '-"
~ fñ ~
d = ~
£ ~ tã
è~::aÐ
.... = co
::; ~.~]
::J<u~
~
V)
~
00
I
I
~
0'\
.........
N
~
t"--
~ ~
~ 8
~ 8
,...-4
V) V)
,...-4 V)
0\ ,...-4
~ co
co 0\
,...-4 \0
t' ~
,...-4 ~
~ ~
en
~
d
] £
æ ~
g ~
. ... .::s
:5 ~
~
~
....
(1)
bQ
'0
='
~
~
~
00
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
...
...
i
-c ~
= .-
= ~
... ~
..c ...
u =
æ~
I ~ i
f~~
c.. u
= ~
è:6
ü~
I
=
=
.-
!d
I-.
=
~
..
=
U
~
=
~
e
~
=
~
~
t
Q
~
~
.-
~
.-
~
.-
~
~
=
= ~
.- ~
!d~
~ =
t :a .§
..w
~ ¡ ~
"8 U i
= 1j 13
~ .~ ã
r.. ~ =
~ ~!
~
o
V')
00
('f"'¡
0\
..........
N
N
..........
t'
~
CO
0\
o
~ ~
~\O...-4(f')~~~O\OO\MV')CO~V')~
.......... .......... ".... ...-4 (f') ~ V') ...-4 \0 ..:t
<,) fn
> ~
fn (I').~ ~ fn Ð
Ð6t::::8 so
o . ..-4 Ð . ..-4 . ..-4
1:: · ..-4 .... (I') .... t: fn
~=~~-- eÐ ~
~ ~ Ð :.= 0(1') ~S fn fn(l') ~
ÞO S .~ .= U .... = 5 ~ ~ ~ "::
~ ~ t: e "¡ e ~ a g g ·8 ~
éd~ ÐÐÐø..ÞOÞOi=~~= ~
~ (I') (I') 0 0 ·õ ~. 0 0 0 æ Ð ["""""
~ ..... d d · ..-4 .......... .... . ..-4 · ..-4 0
~ ~ ~.> éd ~ § (I') .>:ë:ë :.= ~
uu~urttï:~~5:&jææ8c:etï:
~
~
ã)
ã
o
f'-)
.....
(1)
ø..
~
~
oò
ø..
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
--
æ
-c ~
= .-
.! ~
-e-¡
~~
I ~i
f~~
.... u
e ~
è:6
Ö~
I
=
=
.....
~
1.4
i
1.4
=
U
..
=
~
5
c.
=
.....
~
~
~
Q
~
~
.....
..
.....
.....
.....
CJ
r:
==
=
.....
~
~
1.4
CJ
~
~
'C
==
=
~
1.4
~
.....
~
'C
= =
~~
~ =
! Ë
U!
~ æ
~ ...
.= &
'C e
== e
~u
-=
~ -i ~
~ 8-u
-=
o
~ ·ß
......... . ....
(1):=
<s
::>
u
~
.....S1;;
J~8
U
V)Ø-c1::
00 0 oW
\0 "¡ ~ fI}
~ g g.8
~<(I)
CL)
~ U g
~ ~ éd oW
~ ";i = fI}
'" =:I CL) 0
~~.su
~ as
~ ~
\C
ff')
viJ
~
~
~
C+-.
o
S .... fI}
8 0 ~ Ù
~~=Ø-c
Z
6
. ....
!d
8
~
~
o
U
~
Ø-c
S
~
~
.....-4
111
00
M
0\
.........
N
~
t'
8
o
~
~
8
o
\0
~
\0
~
~
~
~
o
t'--
~
I:'
V
~
\0
~
M
~
\0
M
~
M
5
e
1::
as
CL)
Q
e-
o
U
fI}
~
tf
~
~
....
OJ
....
=
~
o
U
~
~
00
Ø-.
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
fIj
....
....
==
-C fIj
= ..
= fIj
:ab
cu =
æ~
I ~ i
f~~
c.. cu
= ~
è:6
u~
I
==
=
.-
=
...
=
Q..
...
=
U
==
~
E
Q..
=
.....
~
~
~
Q
~
~
.-
....
.-
.....
.-
~
r:
==
= .....
.- ~
=~
~ = =
t~~
~ .... =
~ ! ë
~ u ca
== .... ~
= ~ ~
~ c
~ ... c
..:c . _ ..c
... ~ ~
,...=. ==-æ
..... ... E-4
0--1::
V') § 0 ~
~ s ~8
~<~
Ð
o
~ 1 fã ~
~~5~
\0 ~u
\0 .8
~ :i
to--
~
Ñ
ff')
ffl
,...¡
~
~ en
o Ð
""== '-c =
0.::s Ð]
~ 0 ..Qs
M ~ Ð
i;2
II
B
.-
ãS
o
o
~
~
o
U
~
~
S
~
~
.-4
'Ii
òô
~
0\
..........
N
N
..........
t'
M
V')
\0
t'
...-4
~
V')
\0
V')
V')
...-4
...-4
~
~
5
e
i
~
o
U
en
~
~
Ð
Q
~
""""4
a.>
=
o
..d
Q.
a.>
ã)
~
~
~
00
Q..
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
~
-
-
==
-= ~
= ....
«: ~
::a-¡
.~ =
~<
I 'Ê i
l'~~
c.. CJ
= ~
è:ã
ü~
I
I
=
c
.-
!d
-.
C
Q..
-.
C
U
~
=
~
a
~
c
......
~
~
~
=
fIj
~
.-
~
.-
......
.-
CJ
~
=
c
.-
!d
~
-.
CJ
~
~
'C
=
=
~
-.
~
......
~
'C
C
~~
e
~u
c-;3
U ã
e
1j C
~~
.= ..
'C t
~i5
;--...
~
~
'-'"
=
o
;--... . ;j
0\ · ....
;--...
00
'-'"
s
~
=
.~
fI2
.>
Q
6't'0000~~
~~t't'~~
~~~t'~
+v)~..ò~~"
;--...~M~~~
~~~~~~
;--...~O\ooooo
O\~~\O\OO\
~~~~~
* .. .. .. .. ..
;--...r--~~~\O
r--~~~~~
~~
\O\O\O~~
G'~~~~~
I r-:t'''~MM
oo~~ooo
~~~~~
~~~
oo~~~
~~~~~
~~t'~~
òò~o"o"
~~oooooo
~~~~~
~~~~~
ãoWfI2;--...~~~~~
..... = Ð \0 ~ M ~ M ~
r::' ~ 6 ·5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'-"'oe~ç:)"";O\~~\O
=<~ ~~~~
<
;--...
\0
'-'"
=%J
;--...='-í
~~~
ã fI2
..= ~
~ ~ ~~
'-'" 0 ... 0
~.su
;--...
~
'-'"
s
~
;--...
M
'-'"
fI2
æ
Ð
j
;--...
~
'-'"
~
~
CZ)
CI)
~
u
:>
~
CZ)
~
z
~
~
o
u
= fI2
.~ ·5
.> ~
QCZ)
~~\O~~
~~oo~~
oooo~~~
M"MÒ~~
0\0\00t't'
~~~MM
~~~
fI2 Ð Ð
800
·E ¡ ¡
.~ .§ Ð 5 5
-=~~==
ß -= Õ .; .;
fI2 fI2 ..... ~ ~
:§ :§ 1! fI2 fI2
.§.§~~~
«~~~
~OOO~\O
·~~~õõ~~
~ ~ r-: \0" 0\" t'''
~~~~~~
.§
fI2
. ....
>
Q
~~~~~
oo~oo
\0 \Ot'oo 00
M'\Ot'oot'
,-",~O\oooo~
+ ~ 00.. ~ 0.. 0..
;--...~O\O\O\~
~~~~~~
\Or--oor--
~~oooo~
O\t'oo~
0\ \Ii 0\ 0\ \0"
~~~~~
oW
fI2
o
U
~
Q
§~§§~
~ ~.. 0" Ò v)
~M~~~
~~~~~
Ð
o
·E
~
~
·S '-
~ Ð
e ~~
O '- èd Ð
Ð~___
U ~~ U
~ ¡ = =
B .9.9
ie~1¡
ã~~~~
~
0..
~
0\
~
~
~
~
V')
QO
('f")
0\
.........
~
~
.........
t'
~
~
o
0"
~
~
~
U'1
~
U'1
o
U
u
ã
o
U'1
....
Q)
~
s
~
~
o
~
Q
~
~
00
~
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
--
--
==
-c ~
= .-
= ~
=5-=
æ~
I ~ i
('~~
'-- CJ
e ~
è:6
ö~
I
=
=
.-
=
r.
=
~
r.
=
U
..w
=
~
e
~
=
.....
~
t
Q
CZ2
~
.-
..w
.-
.....
.-
CJ
~
==
= .....
.- ~
='=
~ =
b ~ .§
~ ..w ~
~ !S Ë
1 u ~
= "t -=
~ f ~
&.. :a 8-
~ ~ £
. =
~ .~
o ..
U]
·C
~ ..
~ ~
u
§~
V)O
N
~
.~
8 ~
a:.=
t: .~
;JS
= .
~ ~
~o
CL)U
~~
~ =
ø.cø.c
s
~
fA
'I)
i&
U2
..
U2
o
U
co
.8
:s
·S
~
U2 ..
~ ~
~u
"'¡.......
~ S ~
<~U
CL)
o
~ ~ ..
::s 5 ~
~ .~ u
~
fI2
l·~ ~
~ :.= 0
.~ u
:5
=
o
..... . ~
§ .! ~
~ ~ 8
< ~
Q
ã
c..... · ~
o ~
~i
>
=
fI2 .~
~ §
~"'¡
>
§ ~
0" G$ ..=
V') ~ §
0\.. < "'¡
~ >
~
U2 ..
~~
ø.c
'3
~
=
.~
~~
S
\0
~
~
0\
...-4
~
§
0"
...-4
N
~
§
§
r:
~
o
00
N
M'
~
\0
r-..
~
~
(of')
=
.~
~
co
.s
::E
·S
~
~
~
~
U2
~
~
N
N
00
V')
~
\0
\0
o
~
0\
...-4
~
~
...-4
00
o
N
N
00
v)
~
~
~
~
00
M
0\
"""'"
N
N
"""'"
r-..
~
...-4
00
o
~
~
(I)
N
V')
~
...-4
'-"
§
~
r-..
~
~
(of')
II
co
"tj
æ
.~
~
~
fI2
~
~
Q)
.s
.8
~
S
fI2
~
~
U2
~
~
c.....
o
.~
~
..
=
co
.s
::E
·S
~
()
o
z
~
.......
~
Q)
~
ø.c
~
~
ex>
Q..,
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
-
-
==
-c ~
= .-
= ~
- ~
-5=
i:i~
II'~ ~
'-' CJ
= ~
è;;
.- =
u~
I
=
=
.-
=
...
=
Q..
...
=
U
==
~
e
Q..
=
~
~
t
Q
fI'J
~
.-
~
~
.-
CJ
r:
=
= ~
.- .....
= -'III
~ =
... ~ =
CJ =
~ ... ....
~ fI'J!d
"C8ë
= ~
= 1j -=
~ ~ ~
..:c .= ~
... 'C ....
= = i
~ ~ >
~
&!
,,¡
i&
=
oW 0
§ 5 .=
a ~ .~
<~s
;:>
II
=
o
. ....
~
]
;(
e-
o
u
~
Ø-4
S
o
~
~
t'
V')
ôO
I
I
("f")
0\
"""
N
N
"""
t'
00
00
"l
...-4
~
~~
.,.)~
~~
~~~
008
\000...-4
fI}
G)
(.)
·E
~
~
·a
~ t ~
8 ~ ~
~ § ~
~ .= ~
~ e ~
.!:: ~ ~
Q~~
~
~
Q)
o
~
~
~
R
00
~I
i
Peat Marwick
Management Consultants
.
Focused experience
for measurable results
Financial Institutions
Management Consulting at KPMG
Peat Marwick is dedicated to bringing
you superior services in focused markets.
Manufacturing and
Technology Industries
Health Care
Government Services
Insurance
In each market, we apply our experience
and knowledge to delivering solutions
to your business problems. As seasoned
professionals, we understand the needs
of executive management.
Real Estate and Hospitality
Airports
Retail and Wholesale
Energy and Utilities
Corporate Transactions
Technology and Operations
Compensation and Benefits
Drawing on our frrm's global capabilities
and resources, we address issues of any
size or degree of complexity, helping to
keep your organization on the critical
path to success in the 21 st century.
.
We take pride in the reputation we have
earned for delivering business solutions
with measurable results.
I
~
~
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
Peat Marwick
Management Consultants
Focused experience
for measurable results
Manufacturing and
Technology Industries
Fi na ncia I Institutions
Health Care
Government Services
Insurance
Real Estate and Hospitality
Ai rpo rts
Retail and Wholesale
Education
City of North Richland Hills
Water and Wastewater
Utilities Department
Energy and Utilities
Corporate Transactions
Technology and Operations
Compensation and Benefits
INDIRECT COST ANALYSIS
Final Report
July 22, 1993
I
I
I:
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I:
I
l'
I
Peat Marwick
Management Consultants
200 Crescent Cou rt
Suite 300
Dallas, TX 75201-1885
Telephone 214 754 2000
Telefax 214 754 2297
July 22, 1993
Mr. Larry Cunningham
Director of Finance
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N .B. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Dear Mr. Cunningham:
This letter summarizes the results of our work concerning the indirect cost analysis
perfonned for the City of North Richland Hills. The approach used in conducting the
review is outlined in our proposal dated September 8, 1992. This report concludes the
activities outlined in that proposal.
STUDY OBJECTIVES
The putpOse of this study is to review the indirect cost allocations currently charged to the
Water and Wastewater Utilities Department and detennine if the current allocations were
adequate. Other city departments (i.e. City Council, City Manager, Finance, Legal, etc.)
provide services to the Utilities day to day operations. The City has asked that we review
the current allocation and detennine whether or not it is sufficient.
FINDINGS
The City currently allocates General Fund costs to the Water and Wastewater Utilities
Department. The administrative fee currently charged to the Utility for indirect costs in
fiscal year 1992-93 is $1,025,000.
Based on our review of the City's cost allocation process, the following fmdings were noted:
. Review of the administrative charges assessed against the Utility on a percent of budget
basis indicates that the amount of $1,025,000 is sufficient to cover the indirect charges
incurred by the Utility.
. Our independent calculation resulted in $1,026,374 of indirect charges which we feel
substantiates the amount recommended by management.
Member Firm of
Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{'
I
_Peat Marwick
Mr. Larry Cunningham
Page 2
. There is incomplete documentation to substantiate direct charges.
RECOMMENDATIONS
· Adopt the allocation method outlined in Tab 1 for charging indirect costs to the Water
and Wastewater Utilities Department. This method includes all departments that provide
benefit to the Utility and utilizes equivalent values to more accurately assess indirect
costs. Tab 2 contains the output from the Indirect Cost Analysis Model.
· Adopt the same method of Indirect Cost Allocations for both the Parks and Recreation
Facilities Development COtporation and the Water and Wastewater Utilities Department.
· Document and strengthen the procedures for recording direct charges so that they are
unifonn throughout the City. Time sheets and automated work order systems can be
utilized to develop cost data that can be used in developing more accurate allocations or
directly charged back at the end of the year.
· Operate the allocation model on an annual basis to support the indirect cost allocation.
Make modifications to the model to reflect changes in costs identified as indirect that are
changed to direct.
· Continue to gather data related to support of more refmed methods of cost allocation.
********
We appreciate the assistance provided by you and your staff during the conduct of this study.
We are pleased to answer any questions you may have about this report.
Very truly yours,
k'PM~ ~cJ (}1/JA,wWf
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{'
I
City of North Richland Hills
Water and Wastewater Utilities Department
Indirect Cost Analysis
Table of Contents
1
Methodology for Allocation of Indirect Costs
2
Output from the Indirect Cost Analysis Model
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
City of North RichIand mils
Water and Wastewater Utilities Department
Indirect Cost Analysis
Table of Contents
[]
Methodology for Allocation of Indirect Costs
2
Output from the Indirect Cost Analysis Model
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
Department/Division
Providing Service
City Council
City Manager
City Secretary
Legal
Civil Service
Finance
Management Infonnation
Systems
Public Works
Parks & Recreation
Non-Departmental
Management Services
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Methodology for Allocation of Indirect Costs
Method of Allocation
Percent of budget (38.45 %)
Percent of budget (38.45 %)
Percent of budget (38.45%)
Percent of budget (38.45 %)
Percent of Staff (14.71 %)
Percent of budget (38.45 %)
Percent of budget (38.45 %)
Estimated utilization (See the Public Works -
Administration worksheet in Tab 2) was used for the
Public Works Division
Estimated utilization (See the Community Services _
Mowing worksheet in Tab 2) was used for the Parks
and Recreation Division
Estimated utilization (See the Property Info
worksheet in Tab 2) was used for the Non-
Departmental Division
Percent of budget (38.45 %)
Note: The 38.45 % cost allocation factor for Percent of Budget was derived by dividing the
total budget for the Water and Wastewater Utilities Department by the total City budget.
The Percent of Staff factor (14.71 %) was computed by dividing the total number of Utility
employees by the total number of City employees.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
1
~
City of North Richland Hills
Water and Wastewater Utilities Department
Indirect Cost Analysis
Table of Contents
Methodology for Allocation of Indirect Costs
Output from the Indirect Cost Analysis Model
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ið
I·~~
è:a
ü.s
I
~
=
~
a
1:
=
~
~
Q
fI.2
~
.....
~
.....
......
.....
$
...
~
~
~"i3
~ '1:J ~
: ~ j
'1:J c
= U
=
...
~
=
~
.w
(Ij
e
U
~ c
f~
..... 5
'1:J e
~~
fIj
-
-
==
-c fIj
= .-
= ~
:s-=
æ~
~
M
~
~
.-4
"l
.-4
~
N ~ 8....... ~
O\M ~
"'.-4\0'1')
.,; ~ \0" ...:
'1')0\0\0
~~~~
"-' ~ "-' "-'
"-'
§
. ..-4
~
œ
8
~
S
~
Go)
.. Go) g
Ð 0 éd
~ fä iš Ð
fä iš ~ .~
~ a .~ i:
~ .¡¡ ~ ~
.~ ~ .. Go)
U}U~B§
= ~.6 ~..=
Ðe:'=~d~
· ..-4 · ..-4 5 .-4
~S~U~
.~
~
~
~
~
t'
I
('f"'¡
0\
"""-
N
~
t'
~
t--
ff')
\C
S
~
~
=
.sa
~
~
8
~
~
z
~
e
e
=
00
=
o
.,:j
~
o
o
~
~
~
~
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
rI.2
-
-
==
-c rI.2
= .-
. ~
:ë-¡
.~ =
~<
.c.....
1:: ~
=u
z.....
_ CJ
= f
è:a
ö.s
I
~-
I
I
=
~
a
1::
=
~
~
Q
~
.-
~
.-
......
.-
~
-
~
~
~-æ
~ '1:S
~ =
; :a
~~
"C = ¡g
=u~
= "t 5
- ~.s
~ - <
:] ~
=
.s =
~ :s
8 ª
~<
~ rn
.s ·5
0=
rn
·5
=
§
. ....
....
=
o
o
~
~
fi s
~rn
~~
....1
5"0
~ :s
Ð=
ø...~
~ b....
~ .> ~
M ..... "0
0\ .... ='
~<=
s
~ 5 t)
Ne~
~ ¡~
Ð
Q
J
§
o
~
§
!
.:l
I
~
=
."
OJ
~
~
'is
~
00
M
~
~
M
~
00
M
~
~
M
~
~
'I")
~
00
~
M
00
~
~
r---
~
...-4
·õ
=
:s
o
U
~
U
~
~
0\
...-4
...-4
~
~
~
0\
...-4
...-4
~
~
'I")
~
00
~
~
~
~
0'"
...-4
~
~
t
~
;;
~
~
u
~
'I")
~
~
o
M
'I")
~...
~
~
'I")
~
00
~
~
~
~...
~
M
~
B
2
~
(/)
è
U
00
M
~
~
~
~
00
M
~
~
~
~
~
'I")
~
oö
~
r---
r--
~
~
...-4
...-4
~
";
ÞO
~
00
0\
o
~...
~
00
0\
o
~...
~
~
...-4
r---
~
...-4
\0
\0
~
r--
M
~
Ð
o
.~
(/)
...-4
.>
U
~
'I")
'1")'"
~
M
~
~
"l
~
~
M
~
~
'I")
~
00
~
M
~
\0
Ñ
...-4
\0
~
~
M
0\
0\'"
0\
~
~
Ð
o
¡
.s
~
ä
Ð
....
rn
;:;.
t.S ~
~ .~
.... Ð
~ ë
Ðø...
ÞO,S
= =
;;Q
~
~
\0
'I")
8'"
...-4
~
~
\0
'I")
8
...-4
~
~
'I")
~
00
~
00
\0
"l
...-4
\0
M
~
rn
Ð
o
·e
Ð
(/)
5
5
~
¡
~
M
~
00
0\'"
o
00
~
...-4 \0
~O\
'1")0\
-.:i \0'"
~ ~
~~
...-4 \0
~O\
'1")0\
~ \0'"
~ ~
~~
uu
~~
uu
M
~
00
0\'"
o
00
~
~
'I")
~
oö
~
~
00
rrt
\0
o
...-4
M'"
~
0...-400\'1")...-4
~Ooo\OMM
M~O\O~~
~... Ñ \Ii ô ...-4'" r--'"
~~'I")\Oooo
~~r--~M~
~ ~ ~ ~ ...-4'" ...-4'"
~~
en
Ð
o
.~
(/) rn
= Ð
o 0
.:llæ ~ 1 ].j
o~ 32en
R.U~ 5 ~~
OJ"; ÞO e~~
'= .~ .¡ ~ § ~ 0
OJ ·a ë .= rn .....
..c:s .Ð >~:ë
õ~ø::~&1~æ
~
o
....-4
00
M
0'\
.........
N
~
I""--
CI'J
~
CI'J
o
U
C+-4
o
=
o
. ....
~
o
o
~
~
~
~
I
ï
I
'.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
~
-
-
==
~ ~
= ..
= ~
:æb
u =
æ~
I.I~
I = t
è:a
u~
I
I
~
==
~
f
=
ø..
~
Q
~
~
.-
~
.-
.....
.-
~
...
~
~
; Q3
~ "
~ =
~~
~~
", = í!
==u~
= ~ 5
... ~.s
~ .= <
="-=
~ JS 8
=
.~ §
g ~
~<
t en
.s ·5
0=
en
·5
~
8
.~
tû
8
~
.w:t:
5 s
~rn
~'õ
.wi
5~
~ ='
Ð~
Q..c...,.
o
~ þ.w
~ .> ~
N .~ ~
0'\ .w ='
~<~
~s
~ iš i
~~-g
~ ø..~
Ð
Q
0'\
~
~
Ñ
~
§
J
0'\
~
~
Ñ
~
~
U
.w
=
='
J
§
J
0000\0
V).-4N
\OO'\~
Ô 0'\" ~..
O\o~
\ONO
~ ~.. -:
~~~
S
is
e
i
Ð
Ð Q
.~ e 8
ætï:z
to-
~
~
to-
~
to-
~
\0
r-:
~
~
u
.-4
0'\
"1
\0
o
\0
r-:
.-4
~
~
...
:a
E
~
~
~
~
Od
o
~
~
ë
t!
S
e
E-c
to-
g
\0"
N
~
~
~
en
5
~
.~
~
Ð
o
.§
rn
~
Q
00
0'\
"1
N
~
"1
.-4
M
~
S:$(~r::V:;~$(
OO~to-\ONO~
Ñ \0" v).. 0" Ñ -: N"
OOO'\~\O\Oto-\O
.-4~ONto-~V)
~ N" ~ .-4'" -:
~ ~ ~
E
=
...
:a
c
~
~
~
~
"C
C
=
~
f
~
c
~
S
e
E-c
~ "'tj
§ ~
~ = en
"'tj Q.. 0 G)
"'tj = Þ-4 "'tj . ~ 0
c: ~ U c: i·e
~ ] G) .~. £ .~ ~
ãšcEg==~~~
= en t!~ "- c
.,g 8 =' c:: 6 ~ .§
o·.:]eu,,; 8
8 ~ ~ Ð c...,. .~ 8
eo-iš"õ~o
a..O~OOCf.)U
§
Ñ
\0
"1
.-4
~
~
o
u
5
e
a.
o
1)
~
Q
en
~
~
'I)
~
0\
~..
QC)
~
t--"
~
~
~
§
r-.
~
S
~
~
~
~..
~
~
~
~
a
..
~
QC)
~
QC)
0\
~
~
~
N
=
~
t--
~
~..
~
'I)
'I)
.....
oè
0\
\Ø
3~
~
~
c
rf
c
.s
...
5
.s
<
S
e
E-c
....
<
S
e
E-c
~
o
....-4
00
M
0\
..........
N
~
t'
{I')
..-
{I')
o
U
~
o
=
.s
..-
COd
o
..sa
:(
~
~
~
~
I
I
I
'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
~
==
Q.)
~
=
~
Q.)
Q
æ
.-
~
.-
......
.-
~
s..
Q.)
...
~-æ
Q.) "CS
~ =
; ~ =
~ ! ¡
~uë
~ i Ê
Q.) s.. tS
==a~
~ ~ j
I
I
I
I
I
I
¡
I i~
I·~~
è:a
ü~
I
W}
-
-
i
-c W}
= .-
= W}
:ab
y =
=
<
fI}
~
5 =
~~æ
If ~
(f')S
0\ 5 Ð
N e ~
0\ '5 ::s
~ o..~
G)
Q
~
\0
~
o
N
00
~
(f')
t"--
~
N N~
~ O\(f')
t"-- t"--V')
-.:i V')-- 0--
V') V')~
N ~(f')
~ ~
--
.~
o
u
.þ
U
.....
G)
:t
¡ :
t .. ~ c
aoll'þ œ
~ 5 .~ ~
œ e S2 .þ
~ 1;; .þ.~
::s .~ U
'þ;.;'=.w
u<:5z
~
0\
\0
o
~
(f')
V')
o
~
~
V')
(f')
N
~
~
.= ~
= ê .~
o .w
~.= §
s e ~ Ð
o1;j.s~
~.ª "0
~ ·s ~ S
.þ ~ £ ~
.~ < ~
u
~
V')
N
o
t"--
t"--
~
(f')
~
~
~
"¡
!
~
8
o
~
t"--
(f')
\0
\0
00
t"--
N
~
~
(f')
o
0\--
\0
V')
~
~N
~~
\0\0
~ N"
~~
~ \0
~
G)
o
.~
VJ
= t
o :.a
·Ë ÞI) ¡a ~ i G)
.w .8 u Ð "0 0
fI};j e::s ¡
G) :ª ..c= e 1;j ~ ~
o 8 0 d = .þ.~
¡ ~ ~ Ð ;.;'.~ ~
~<A.4U~~Ð
tï: ~;:>z
--
.~
>
u
~
~
:t:
t'
("f""¡
0\
........
N
~
t'
~
ÞOO-C
i
~
=
~
~
~
~
~
I
i
I
'-
I
I
I
I
I
~
=
~
f
=
=..
~
Q
~
.....
~
.....
~
.....
~
..
~
~
r-æ
~'g
~ :?J =
~ ~ ~
"O8~
; ... cS
~. CJ =
.... ~-.c
~ .= ~
::'g~
~ ~ =
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
~
-
-
=
-= ~
I ~~
=~
I ið
I·~~
è:a
ö~
I
en
5 ]
~~£
æ ~
s
~ 5 G$
N a ~
~ ï &!
co
Q
~
0\
00
o
~~~~~~~~~
f' 0\ ("10\0\00("1
O\N\OOO("1\o~....("1
O~~OMMOr--:M
....
V')
N
0\
~
("1
~
0""0 O\....V')OO 00\0
~Ooo\ONNV')....N
N("1o\OV')V')\OO\~
~ Ñ \0" 0" r: .-: ò 0\ ("1"
("1~V')\ooooO\o~
~V')f'("1~N\ONO
~ ~ ~ ~ .-: .-: ~.. ~ ......
~~~~~
~
~
en
~
~
~
5
a
CI)
~
fã
~
en
CI)
o
] ~
d 8
o .E
1:=1 ~"~ ~
oJ3 '3 en ~ Š
.....u _~ = ~ ~ ~
~ ÐaO~ ¿ij
ètÞO =~c(J ~
o .~ ~ e .~ en CI) Q
:¡ ~ ] "> ::ë .IoC ~ e .=
~a:::.:J&]æ~~ti:~
~
00
\0
~
("1
00
o
N
8
"l
V')
....
~
en
2
.a
.-
~
i
Þ<
(.tJ
~
c(J
o
~
=
£
5
o
'3
~
~
00
f'
oö
f'
~
\0
N
~
("1
~
en
5
e
2
.~
~
CI)
o
·E
~
i
Q
~
~
("1
~
~~~~~~
oooo~
~f'NV')V')O\
O~O~OM
V')
....
N
'Ii
N
~
0\
....
~
0\("1§............
0\00 0\f'V')
00("1 t---\ON
Ñ'Ii'liv)'òÑ
oooO\~\O\O
........~ONr---
~ N" N" ~ ......
~ ~ ~
en
2
.a
.-
~
5
~
(.tJ
~
§
~
1
5
o
'3
~
en
CI)
o
] ·E
~~]
"¡šd~
~ aÐ ~
.§ ~
CI) 0
g ~.=
~ fã ~
£~8
~
æ
ø..
.....~
u =
~=
8 ..... ~
d ::: CI)
= ~ en
~ ~ ...
= c::: ::s
en ~ 0
= e u
..... CI) ~
~ is 0
~oo
~
~
~
~
~
0'\
.........
N
~
f'
~
.....,¡
1)
on
~
=
~
~
~
~
I
i
I
'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
æ
I ~ð
I·~~
è:.a
ü~
I
=
~
e
1::
=
~
~
Q
fC
.-
....
.-
...
.-
~
s..
~
....
~Q3
~'8
; :?1 c
~ U ~
,..... = as
w U ë
; ... cg
s.. ~-=
~ .= 1$
:: "g -r
~ Þ-4 =
rIJ
-
-
i
-= rIJ
= .-
= fI'J
:æb
u =
=
<
rn
"'Cj
5 §
~~r,¡..
tf ~
;(
~s
0\ 5 G)
N e "'Cj
0\ '5 =
~ ø..~
Ð
~
~
\0
~
o
o
~
~
~
I'
~
§
r,¡..
8
....
..
=
.~
..
rn
Ð
~
~
J
~
0\
~
~
§
M'"
\0
"l
~
~
rn
Ð
o
]
Õ
·a
~
o
U
.. ~
]~co
:I 5 ~
r,¡.. e =
õ1n::S Ð
.... = ~ co
:= :a' .w. ]
~<u~
00
~
~
..;
00
<'i
I'
....
~
..-.. ..-..
M~
0\ ~
1'\0
'1')'" ~...
'I')~
~~
'-" '-"
~
~
~
~
("f"')
0'\
""'-
N
~
f'
~
~
oê
ff')
~
8
8
~
In
~
0\
:
~
r--.
~
~
'I')
'I')
~
~
0\
\0
~..
~
"'Cj
£
õ
:.=
....
~
rn
"'Cj
=
~
~
;(
s
~
~
......
....
Q.)
an
'0
::s
CQ
~
~
~
I
i
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
=
I ~ð
I-~~
è:.a
Ö~
I
..w
==
~
e
1:
=
~
~
Q
C'IJ
~
.-
..w
.-
,....
.-
~
a..
~
..w
~"æ
~ 'C
..w = =
~ ~ .s
~ i ~
"CI U ~
; ..w ~
a.. ~ 'is
B .= ã
= 'C ~
~ ~ ~
~
-
-
==
-c ~
= ..
= ~
:æb
y =
=
<
~ U2
= ~ B
co ._ ._
o ....-4 ~
t ..;::: .;
ø..;:J~
U2
~B
· ..-4 . ..-4
....-4 ~
..= .;
;:J 0
~
c..,.
o rIJ
..... ~ B
s CO ._
o 1 .~
E-c = ~
zø..
~
~
::t:
['
.
("fj
0\
""'-
N
N
""'-
['
~ ~ ~
00 ~ ~
~ ~ r---
~ ~ ~
~ ~
V) V) 0
~ -.:t' \0
O ~ 00
... \Ø'OI ~ - (f1 V) V) 0\ 0\ N V) 00 ~ V) 0
"'I "" ,., ~ ~ N ~ (f1 -.:t' V) ~ \0 ~
5
8
i
Ö rIJ
> co
U2 CJ'.).~ ~ rIJ Ð
co Bi: =8 80
o ._ G.) ._._
.> t: 0 CJ'.) 5 i: ~
~ b = CO....-4 z:::::: G.) -
t ~ co ...-4 CJ'.) 0 Q.. S en rIJ CJ'.) ~
ÞO .! 0 ::: u.~ = t: t: ~
as co ...-4 5 S ~ co 0 0 ,w- S
Iii ~ .~ G) ~ ~]. ÞO ~ ~ ~ "§ ~
~ CJ'.) CJ'.) 0 0 ~ 0 ·1 0 0 0 ~ co
~ ..... c c ""'- · a...... ..-4 · ..-4 0
~ ~ ~.> Cd ~ CJ'.) =' .>:õ:õ = 2
uu~uææ:i~ø::~ææ8ææ
co
Q
'S
~
Gj
d
d
o
tI)
~
(1)
Q..
~
~
~
~
I
i
--."
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
-
-
=
-= ~
= -.
= W'J
- ~
..c-
CJ =
.. =
~<
I .c...
1:: ~
=u
_z ...
'-- CJ
I = ~
è:a
.. =
u~
I
==
~
f
=
~
~
Q
~
.-
...
.-
= .:l
~ ~
u
.æ r
... ... -i
~ ~ =
~'g~
i ~ ~
~ ~ of
..... = ~
-"UrIJ
ã~Q
.. IS-§
~ =ã æ
:> = e
~ þIIII4 u
~
~
::t:
t'
I
I
M
0\
.........
N
N
.........
t'
t'\O...-4
oo-.:t'~
OO~tn
o\v)~
OOV')ff')
~~~
~
o
~
....
~
~ =
o 8 e
u .= ~
co = =
.8 ~ ~
~.w~
o = ~
~85
~ e
~=3~
<:::>~
bO
=
o~
o
:E
I
I
tI1
o
o
°E
o
en
Þ
oS
~
o
U
~
~
~
I
ï
I
'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
......
=
~
e
1:
=
Q..
~
Q
~
.-
......
.-
....
.-
~
r. =
~ .s
...... ..
= Q3 f
~--=~
~ =·a
~ ::g ..
~ ~ .8
~ fI.2-<
18 ~
= 1j ~
r. ~ ~
~ .= .~
." --= ...
=> =.Q
~ ~ ~
~
=
=
." ~
= ..
= ~
- ~
.c-
c:J =
ii~
I .c..
1:: ~
=u
_z ..
_ c:J
I = ~
c:a
.. =
u~
I
-
~
~
::t:
t'
I
I
M
0'\
.........
N
~
C=(f')(f')'C
O\O(f')O\
::>.. ..... 0\ 0 0\
.w ....... ... ...
:'=CU(f')(f')'C
.':;: 8N~~
;:>=~~i&
<
c=~~
è·~88
:'=:Soo
.':;: ..... V) V)
;:>$
;:>
æ
.8
CÐ~
&ji!
~ e
~Ji
=
09
e
.....
tI1
08
°ë
"t:S
<
I
I
tI1
~
~
o~
~
~
~
~
I
i
I
'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
=
~
e
1::
=
~
~
Q
fI.2
~
.....
~
.....
~
.....
~
-
~
=~
~-8~
~ = ð
~ ~ ~
~ ~ e
'C = ==
= U æ
= èt:
1:$<
t f I
= :a .~
~ ~ ;ë
~
....
....
==
'C ~
= ....
= ~
.... ~
-=-¡
.s= =
~<
I ~¡
=u
. z ......
_ u
I = ~
c:.s
u~
I
~§~~~~
·=Of'O~
~":":~~
· .... 0'\ \0 N ,.-..4
:=00
S
~~v)f'\O~
..oãif'\O\O~
eU~,.-..4
i~
oo~
:8
~\l3
~f'
~
.....
Ja
Ð
e fI}
~:;
~U
o fI}
t1 Ð .....
o ÞO 6
uS::t
~ 5 .....
as ~ Ð
ëü Ð ~
rJ)Ø-.<
fI}
:;
u
fI} fI} .þ
~ ~ fI} .....
ðð~§
Ð..... .....
.~ .B 0 J
"õ~U....
Ø-.;;><o
~~Ø\~
Of'ff')
\OV)ff')
v)'\l3N
~ ~
~
§ §
..... .....
~ ~
= 8
S~
~~
==
. .... . ....
SS
~
~
~
~
M
~
"
N
~
t'
~
0'\
""""
00
,.-..4
""""
~
~
~
0'\
""""
V)
""""
~
~
o
·C
~
~
2
rJ)
Ð
....
o
Z
~
-æ
u
CI)
...
::s
o
:I:
...
Go)
~
I
.
(1)
.~
13
ø..
~
~
~
I
r
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I ~
't:S rIJ
I ~~
.~ =
~<
I ~¡
=u
I·~~
è:a
u~
I
~
=
~
e
1::
=
=-
~
=
rs
.-
~
.-
....
.-
~
a..
~
~
= Q3
~-=
~ =
; ::?1 .§
~ ~ i
"C = c
=~i
t ~ ~
~ .- ~
= "C c.
~ ~ ~
~
è .§
:'=.&J
.':: · C
::J .....
~
U
§~
~'" 0
N('f')
~
8 =
! .g
=- ~
~S
þooooo .....
è::J
Ð è
Q..:.=
e .=
~~
t--
~
t--
~
......
'I)
QC
0\
~
Zl
C'IJ
o
U
co
=
:§
-5
~
§3t;
~~8
Ð
o
t; ~ .....
::1 5 C'IJ
~ ..... 0
=u
.¡
~
C'IJ
§.~t;
~ :.= 0
....c U
S
~
":; . ...c
~::1 .~ ~
·C U
~
Q
~
c..,. · ...c
o .....
~~
>
~
è ....c
. ...c .....
== §
::Jëa
>
§ ... 8
'" Ð ....c
~ fa ¡
0\", < "¡
~ >
~
è.....
s~
S
.~
~]
....c
S
è.....
....c C'IJ
:::: 0
SU
~
....c
.....
0\
...-4
~
~
~
~
0\
o
0\'"
N
~
~
0\
o
0;
N
~
~
...-4
~
('f')
§
0'"
\0
00
~
§
8
('f')
~
~
00
\0
~
r-:
...-4
~
~
f'
('f')
~
8
o
N
:¡
:t
è
U
~
~
00
o
§
Ô
N
N
~
§
0'"
N
N
~
\0
N
00
N'"
\0
N
00
N
~
8
8
...-4
"'0
~
=
Cl)
o~
o
....
~
....
""
~
~
\0
o
~
00
\0
...-4
~
~
00
\0
...-4
~
o
~
~
M
o
~
~
N'"
~
8
8
...-4
~
01)
"'0
ã5
I
I
"'0
>
æ
Cl)
o~
o
....
~
....
""
~
0\
~
o
8
~
\0'"
N
...-4
~
8
"l
\0
N
...-4
~
o
N
~
~
~
~
8
8
...-4
15
UJ
~
æ
~
.
01)
:s
Ð
~
8
""
~
('f')
N
o
8
"l
00
~
~
8
"l
00
~
~
\0
...-4
~
\0
...-4
~
~
8
8
...-4
15
UJ
~
æ
I
I
"'0
>
ã5
Cl)
05
o
~
8
\0
~
0\
N
o
§
'Ii
f'
~
§
\0'"
f'
~
N
0\
f'
N
0\
f'
~
8
8
...-4
s
UJ
~
æ
~
~
U
.s
o
o
=
8
....
~
~
~
~
~
I
I
('f")
0\
""
N
~
f'
~
0\
o
o
~
,.....
N
o
~
('f')
N
~
8
...-4
v)
~
~
~
('f')
N
~
8
...-4
~'"
~
~
N
0\
...-4
N
~
N
N
0\
,.....
N
~
N
~
8
8
...-4
~
8
8
...-4
~
Þ-oI
'è
~
~
~
~
~
I
i
«)
rIJ
:s
o
:t
~
æ
«)
Cl)
='
o
:t
~
æ
I
"'0
ø:::
"'0
o
o
t
:t
I
I
Ü
;¡j
"'0
c:
~
o
o
~
M
o
\0
00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ið
I·~~
è:a
U~
I
~
-
-
==
-= ~
= ..
= ~
- ~
.c-
y =
æ~
=
~
e
1::
=
ø..
~
Q
fIJ
~
.....
~
.....
.....
.....
~
...
~
~
~"æ
~ ~
~ =
; ~ ã
:> ....
~ ~ ~
." = ë
ãUi
- ~ 1':>
~ ... 1:
~ ..... ~
= ." =-
~ ~ t
6
~ .g
=.c
.';:: ·C
;:> ....
6
u
§~
V')'" 0
N~
~
Ð
~ .~
:s ~
fI} . ....
~::;
~;:>
Ð ~
ø..=
o · ....
..... ....
ø..::>
r---
~
r---
~
...-4
an
QC
Ø\
~
15
fI}
o
U
ÞO
=
:g
·6
~
~....
..... fI}
::: 0
;5U
§st;
~~8
Ð
o
] ~ 'ä
~ .~ CJ
~
fI}
§.~t;
~ = 0
..... u
:5
6
~ .';::
~:s .š ~
·C U
~
Q
6
~ .....
o ....
~~
>
6
~ .....
. .... ....
::; ~
::>~
>
§ - §
'" Ð .....
~ ~ §
~<~
~ >
~
~....
=~
:5
6
. ....
~~
:5
N
~
o
~'"
N
~
N
~
~
N
~
~
N
~
o
Ñ
~
~
~
o
N
V')
§
ô
V)
~
..-.4
~
§
8
00
..-.4
~
V')
t"--
~
..-.4
..-.4
8
~
V')
..-.4
~
~
V)
t"--
~
I
...
o
..
.Er
Co)
·S
=
~
<
o
o
N
r-..
~
V')
00
~
§
~
..-.4
~
§
~
..-.4
~
~
8
8
..-.4
f-
aJ
I
~
o
c
CI.)
~
~
o
~
~
~
V)
00
~
§
~
..-.4
~
§
~
..-.4
~
~
8
8
..-.4
f-
aJ
I
...
o
~
f
o
co
~
r-..
~
00
t"--
v)
§
8'"
"l
..-.4
~
§
8
"l
..-.4
~
~
8
8
..-.4
f-
aJ
I
~
~
~
::s
=
.....
o
~
r-..
..-.4
V)
00
0\
N
~
~
~
~
t"--
M
0\
........
N
N
........
t"--
~
00
t"--
v)
~
0\
V)
o
~
§
8
"l
..-.4
~
§
8'"
"l
..-.4
~
~
00
N
~
..-.4
..-.4
~
~
8
8
..-.4
~
000.04
è
( )
e
~
~
~
~
I
ï
f-
aJ
I
"0
~
=
1'1.)
°5
o
~
'"
co
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
Peat Marwick
Management Consultants
Focused experience
for measurable results
Manufacturing and
Technology Industries
Management Consulting at KPMG
Peat Marwick is dedicated to bringing
you superior services in focused markets.
Financial Institutions
Health Care
Government Services
Insurance
In each market, we apply our experience
and knowledge to delivering solutions
to your business problems. As seasoned
professionals, we understand the needs
of executive management.
Real Estate and Hospitality
Airports
Retail and Wholesale
Energy and Utilities
Corporate Transactions
Technology and Operations
Compensation and Benefits
Drawing on our fmn's global capabilities
and resources, we address issues of any
size or degree of complexity, helping to
keep your organization on the critical
path to success in the 21 st century.
We take pride in the reputation we have
earned for delivering business solutions
with measurable results.