HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1992-06-08 Agendas
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 8, 1992 - 5:30 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820.
I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
1. IR 92-54 V olunteer Code Enforcement - Councilwoman
Johnson (10 Minutes)
2. IR 92-59 Cable Franchise Renewal (5 Minutes)
I 3. IR 92-60 I Sign Ordinance (5 Minutes) I I
4. CERT Report - Richard Davis (5 Minutes)
5. IR 92-62 Fourth of July Celebration (5 Minutes)
6. PS 92-10 Reconsideration of Request of Gary Starnes for
Final Plat on Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Orange
Valley Addition, Section 2 (Located on the East
side of Douglas Lane North of Starnes Road)
(Denied at the April 27, 1992 City Council
Meeting) (Agenda Item No. 17) (5 Minutes)
7. PZ 92-15 Public Hearing for Consideration of an
Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1080
Regarding Minimum Square Foot Requirements
of Dwelling Units in the R-3 Single Family
Residential Zoning District - Ordinance No. 1809
(Agenda Item No. 15) (5 Minutes)
8. PZ 92-16 Public Hearing for Consideration of an
Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1080
Regarding the Masonry Requirements on Existing
Residential Structures - Ordinance No. 1810
(Agenda Item No. 16) (5 Minutes)
9. GN 92-69 Automated Fingerprint Identification System -
I Resolution No. 92-31 (Agenda Item No. 18) (5
Minutes)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
NUMBER
10. GN 92-70
I ACTION TAKEN I
ITEM
Municipal Communications Upgrade - Resolution
No. 92-30 (Agenda Item No. 19) (10 Minutes)
11. PW 92-15
Approval of Proposal for Water and Wastewater
Impact Fee Verification Study (Agenda Item
No. 26) (5 Minutes)
12. PAY 92-05
Approve Reimbursement to Lone Star Gas
Company for Pipeline Adjustment on Bursey Road
Improvements - Resolution No. 92-29 (Agenda
Item No. 28) (5 Minutes)
Other Items (5 Minutes)
II
¡
1:
Í¡
¡: 13.
il
II
¡I
:¡ 14.
!j
Ii
i;
Ii
Ii
I
I 15.
¡¡
¡:
!;
Work Session
Reminder: Sales Tax Issue following Regular
Meeting if Time Permits
*Executive Session (25 Minutes)
a. Personnel
b. Briefing on Pending Litigation
c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition
, 16.
Adjournment - 7:20 p.m.
~Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is
'~ontemplated, it will be taken in open session.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CI1Y COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 8, 1992
For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion
and/or action.
'I NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
I 1. Call to Order
II 2. Invocation
II 3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting
~ ~ May 11, 1992
¡ I
:,
II
II Minutes of the Special Meeting
:i 5.
1
j; May 19, 1992
I'
¡
Ii
I:
'I
I ~ 6. Minutes of the Special Meeting
II
¡. June 1, 1992
!i
Ii
;!
¡.
!.
Ii 7. Presentations by Boards & Commissions
I!
p a. Library Board Minutes
..
ì
~
8. Presentation of "Yard of the Month"
awards for May
1¡
,I 9. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent
Agenda
! 10. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by
Asterisk (17, 18,20,21,22,23,24,25, 26,
27, & 28)
i
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
11. PZ 92-14 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request of Herman J.
Smith & Company to Rezone Lots 4-7,
I Lots 12-14 and Lots 16-18, Richland
I Oaks Addition from R-l Flood Plain, R-
I 1 Single Family Residential, C-1
I
II Commercial, and Existing Right-of-Way
to C-2 Commercial - Ordinance No. 1808
(Located on Bedford Euless Road
! between Strummer Drive and Oakridge
I; Terrace)
I'
11
,!
II
'¡
.: 12. PZ 92-10 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC
I
I.
, ; HEARING - Request of Rita Jo Hazel
ì; to Rezone Tract 4P1B, A.G. Walker
~ Survey, Abstract 1630, from R-7-MF
j Multi-Family Residential to C-2
I: Commercial - Ordinance No. 1805
¡i (Located on the east side of Flory Street,
it approximately 400 feet south of Glenview
q Drive)
.
:t
13. PZ 92-11 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request of Bill Lightfoot to
,1 Rezone Part of Tract 12, S. Richardson
f ~ Survey, Abstract 1266, from AG
j Agriculture to C-l Commercial -
Ordinance No. 1806 (Located at 7714
Davis Boulevard)
14. PZ 92-12 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request of Conoco, Inc. for
a Specific Use Permit on Lot 1R, Block
r. B, and Parts of Lots 1 and 2, Block B,
!!
. . Richland Oaks Addition for a Car Wash
; Facility - Ordinance No. 1807 (Located
at Bedford Euless Road and Mesa Verde
Trail)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 3
I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
15. PZ 92-15 Public Hearing for Consideration of an
I Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No.
I
I 1080 Regarding Minimum Square Foot
I Requirements of Dwelling Units in the
R-3 Single Family Residential Zoning
I District - Ordinance No. 1809
16. PZ 92-16 Public Hearing for Consideration of an
\ Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No.
: 1080 Regarding the Masonry
¡ Requirements on Existing Residential
i Structures - Ordinance No. 1810
I
I
II
!I *17. PS 92-10 Reconsideration of Request of Gary
Starnes for Final Plat on Lots 1 and 2,
I Block 2, Orange Valley Addition, Section
I 2 (Located on the East Side of Douglas
i Lane north of Starnes Road) (Denied at
, the April 27, 1992 City Council Meeting)
I
!
I
í
* 18. G N 92-69 Automated Fingerprint Identification
¡
:i System - Resolution No. 92-31
'I
¡
'¡
19. GN 92-70 Municipal Communications Upgrade -
¡ Resolution No. 92-30
f
j
I
'I *20. GN 92-71 Authorizing Signatures for Release of
i ~
. Pledged Securities - Resolution No. 92-27
.j
:;
!!
!
:¡ *21. GN 92-72 Tobacco Free Policy for City Buildings -
II Ordinance No. 1804
,
d
¡í
:
*22. GN 92-73 Appointment to Teen Court Advisory
Board
¡
J
*23. PU 92-16 Award Bid for Emergency Generator
t Replacement and Installation
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 4
II NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
*24. PU 92-17 Award of Bid for Sale of City Property
Lot A, Block 1, Browning Heights North
Addition
*25. PW 92-14 Minor Drainage Improvements for 1992
*26. PW 92-15 Approval of Proposal for Water and
Wastewater Impact Fee Verification
Study
¡
*27. PA Y 92-04 Emergency Roof Repair at Library
*28. PAY 92-05 Approve Reimbursement to Lone Star
Gas Company for Pipeline Adjustment
on Bursey Road Improvements -
I Resolution No. 92-29
¡
29. Citizens Presentation
I
!
! 30. Adjournment
i!
iI
II
POSTED
{ß -6 9(-J.,
Date
/)-00 j).ffl.
/11me
City Secretary
~O -~~ /
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. IR 92 54
~~
...c::::::::: Ie ~
~r
Date: June 8, 1992
Subject: Volunteer Code Enforcement
Council Member Jo Ann Johnson has made a proposal that should be
considered by the City Council. Her daughters, Ms patricia Duckett and
Ms Sherry Christensen, have offered to serve as citizen volunteers to
initiate, in the City of North Richland Hills, a proactive code
enforcement program. Their emphasis would be to assist neighborhoods
in identifying code violations and assisting in the clean up process.
It has been a City policy for many years that enforcement of this
ordinance be accomplished on a reactive basis. One Code Enforcement
Officer acts primarily on a complaint basis for general nuisances,
including unsightly premises, front yard storage, inoperable vehicles,
etc. as well as sign violations. Our only other Code Enforcement
Inspector handles grass and weed complaints and assists in other
building inspection activities. When any of our other Building
Inspectors are on vacation or the workload is extremely heavy, code
enforcement activities generally stop as these two Code Inspectors fill
in as needed.
It is also important to understand that these two inspectors have very
little clerical assistance. Follow up inspections, notification
letters, citations, scheduled court appearances, telephone follow up
and other administrative duties of their unit are handled by the
inspectors. As a matter of information, we currently have
approximately 2,000 individual cases being monitored at anyone time.
As you are aware, many of our neighborhoods have numerous code
violations and the creation and support of this activity could result
in numerous complaints to the City Council. I am also apprehensive
about the spill-over effect on our skeleton code enforcement
organization. We simply are not equipped, at this time, to handle any
increase in code enforcement activity. The type of activity that Ms
Duckett and Ms Christensen are pursuing would need to be staffed by
volunteers who would work with neighborhood organizations to identify
and correct obvious code violations.
If approved the volunteer organization must be prepared to assist the
City in correcting those violations that eventually come to the
attention of the Code Inspector.
This type of arrangement would need the total support of the Council.
Therefore, Council guidance is requested.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Deputy City Manager
_ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I '
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. I R 92-59
\:J~
)(
~r
Date: J u n e 8, 1 9 9 2
Subject: Cable Franchise Renewal
The current cable television franchise with Sammons Communications,
Inc. expires in January 1995.
The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 specifically requires
municipalities to adhere to a renewal process which begins (36) months
prior to the franchise expiration date, which in our case would be
January of 1992. In the balance of this report we will refer to this
date as the "beginning date."
During a six month period after the beginning date the city may on its
own initiative, and must at the request of the cable company, begin
public hearings (or hearing) related to the cable needs of the
community and to the performance of the cable company.
Upon completion of the public hearing the cable company will submit a
proposal for renewal containing such material as the franchising
authority may require including upgrades in the cable system.
After receipt of the renewal proposal, the city must provide public
notice of the proposal and, during the four month period which begins
on the date of the completion of the public hearing the city must
renew the franchise or issue a preliminary finding that the franchise
should not be renewed.
In respect to where we are currently in this process, Sammons
Communications has requested a public hearing, has began formal
discussions wi th the Cable Board and Staff regarding the ci ty' s
requirements, and is working on a formal proposal for presentation.
According to the Cable Act of 1984, there are only four allowable areas
of consideration in the decision as to whether or not to renew the
franchise:
(A) Has the cable operator substantially complied with the material
terms of the existing franchise?
(B) Has the quality of service (signal quality, response to consumer
complaints and billing practices) been reasonable in light of community
needs?
(C) 'Does the operator have the financial, legal and technical ability
to provide the services, facilities and equipment as set forth
in the operator's proposal; and
(D) Is the operator's proposal reasonably capable of meeting future
cable-related community needs, taking into account the cost of meeting
such needs?
.. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
...
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
It is Staff's opinion, based on documentation, that Sammons
Communication does comply with the above considerations and therefore;
we find no basis for refusing to pursue the renewal request as
prescribed by Federal Law.
Staff requests the City Council approve June 29, 1992 for the public
hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~ ~~
Kane Kelly
RA-S
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
øøøsøøø
LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS INC.
May 7, 1992
Mayor Tommy Brown
City of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182
RE: C.E.R.T. Committee Report
Dear Mayor Brown:
Attached please find the Executive Summary of activities and recommendations of the
C.E.R.T. Committee that was formed in December 1990. At your earliest possible
convenience please schedule me the opportunity to address you and your City Council
regarding our findings and conclusions.
Please include in your agenda the authorization of funds for our 2nd Annual July 4 Rally
at Birdville Stadium. The continued support of each City is vital in the success of this
program.
I appreciate the opportunity to seIVe as Chairman of this group and all should be
commended for their efforts and time given to their community.
Sincerely,
LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS, INC.
1
~.'"\ '-nA-
c{\ \ L·~V\f.O LUJJ'o
Richard Davis
Division Manager
RD:jdb/0507C
attachment
6100 ELLIOT REEDER ROAD, FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76117
(817) 332-7301
@
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(6Q[Ec[JJQLrc
Cities EHploring Resources Together
Executive Summary
Fiscal 1992/1992
May 5, 1992
Mission Statement (Proposed and Adopted December 19 1990)
The mission of Cities Exploring Resources Together, being composed of the Cities
of Watauga, Richland Hills, North Richland Hills and Haltom City, is to develop a
program which will identify resources \vhich, when shared and/or exchanged, will
enhance the quality of life of area residents and increase the level of economic
development \vithin the combined geographic area of the four Cities.
Q.bjectives of C E R T (Proposed and Adopted December 19r 1990)
Development of a regional transportation system
Residents of the City of Richland Hills voted to joined the Fort Worth
Transportation Authority May 2, 1992
Research of major grants(Federal and State) for metropolitan projects
Public safety services
Employee resources and benefits
Combining maintenance responsibilities and the development of the communities
infrastructure
Economic development
Joint planning bet\veen governmental agencies i.e., City, County, School District,
NTCOG, etc.
Identify and research any and all other resources that can be shared or exchanged
Goal (Proposed and Adopted December 19r 1990)
As cities explore resources together, priorities will emerge which identify
opportunities leading to improved levels of service for all citizens.
I..a.pics Considered By C E R T
Cooperative Purchasing - February 5, 1991 - No action recommended beyond what
is currently taking place
Heavy Equipment Pooling - February 13, 1991 - No action recommended
Joint July 4th Celebration - February 13, 1991 - All four Cities, in conjunction with
the Birdville Independent School District and the Northeast Tarrant County
Chamber of Commerce, pooled financial resources as well as police and fire
personnel for a '''July 4th and Welcome Home the Troops" celebration at Birdville
Stadium.
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
C.E.R.T.Summary Report
Page T\vo
May 5, 1 992
IQpics (continued)
Combined Public Safety Communications - April la, 1991 - No action
recommended
Health Insurance - June 12, 1991 - No action recommended
Combined City/School Elections - June 12, 1991 - Resolutions passed by the four
city councils endorsing concept. Discussions are taking place between the City
Secretaries of the respective cities and BISD Adrrúnistration to effect joint elections
beginning in the spring of 1993.
Emergency Warning Systems - August 21, 1991 - No action recommended
Library Study - August 21, 1991 - No action recommended
Vehicle Impoundment Facilities - October 16, 1991 - No action recommended
Economic Development - October 16, 1991 - No action recommended
Landscape Design - October 16, 1991 - Coordinate landscape design for common
road\vays
Promoting BISD/Economic Development - January 15, 1992 - Under consideration
Future of C.E.R.T
It is the recommendation óf the current members of Citizens Exploring Resources
Together that the membership of the aforementioned committee be expanded and
reorganized. It is proposed that each of the member cities along with the Northeast
Tarrant County Chamber of Commerce and the Birdville Independent School
District appoint one representative each to form the core of the newly reorganized
C.E.R.T.. The balance of the membership should be by invitation only and should
include representatives from the business community, city government, civic
groups, clergy, retirement community, citizens at large, etc. Furthermore, it is
recommended that total membership in the reorganized C.E.R.T. be limited to 50
indi viduals.
Additionally, the focus of C.E.R.T. should be broadened to include any and all
topics which might have a potential material effect upon the quality of life offered to
area residents. C.E.R.T. should provide a forum for and encourage active
communication and analysis of concerns affecting the political entities embracing
the aforementioned organization.
It is our request that the Cities of Watagua, Richland Hills. North Richland Hills
and Haltom City along with the B.LS.D. and the Northeast Tarrant County
Chamber of Commerce continue to encourage their respective management teams to
assist C.E.R.T. with compilation of the data necessary to provide informed
recommendations.
\Ve extend our thanks to the management teams of the political entities involved for
their efforts and willingness to work with the committee on the reports presented.
.;\dditionally, we thank the mayors and the members of the city councils of the
respective cities for their support and \villingness to allo,v their management teams
to participate in our efforts.
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
NO.lR 92-62
^
~~
c::::::::: . :=::::=--
~r
Date: June 8, 1992
Subject: Fourth of July Celebration
A patriotic celebration is being planned for the Fourth of July at the
Birdville Stadium. This celebration will be similar to the one that we
took part in last year. This is a combined effort of Richland Hills,
Watauga, Haltom City, North Richland Hills, B.l.S.D. and Northeast
Chamber of Commerce. Last year we contributed $3,500 to this effort.
We have been asked to contribute the same amount this year. The money
is available in our Economic Development fund.
Resp~ctfi71Y ~Ubmitted,
a,~~~
C.A. sanforJ .
Assistant City Manager
CAS:ph
~ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CI1Y
COUNCIL OF THE CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CI1Y HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - MAY 11, 1992 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting to order May 11, 1992, at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Tommy Brown
Byron Sibbet
Lyle E. Welch
Mark Wood
Jo Ann Johnson
Linda Spurlock
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilwoman
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
C.A. Sanford
Jeanette Rewis
Rex McEntire
Greg Dickens
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
City Engineer
i\bsent:
Mack Garvin
Councilman
2.
INVOCATION
\1ayor Pro Tern Sibbet gave the invocation.
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING APRIL 27,1992
APPROVED
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve the minutes
of the April 27, 1992 meeting.
Ivlotion carried 5-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
May 11, 1992
Page 2
5.
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING MAY 4,1992
Mayor Pro Tem Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve the minutes
of the May 4, 1992 meeting.
Motion carried 4-0; Councilman Welch abstaining due to absence from the meeting.
6.
PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER ADVISORY COMMITIEE MINUTES
B. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES
C. TEEN COURT ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES
No action necessary.
7.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet removed Item No. 17 from the Consent Agenda.
8.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, & 20)
APPROVED
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve the Consent
i\genda.
\1otion carried 5-0.
9.
PS 90-30 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO
AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 1579 THE SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS, REGARDING MASONRY SCREENING
WALL REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW SUBDIVISIONS -
ORDINANCE NO. 1800
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve
Ordinance No. 1800.
Motion carried 5-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
May 11, 1992
Page 3
10.
GN 92-58 RESOLUTION ADOPTING GUIDELINES AND
CRITERIA FOR GRANTING TAX ABATEMENT IN
REINVESTMENT ZONES CREATED IN THE
CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS -
RESOLUTION NO. 92-24
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve Resolution
No. 92-24.
Motion carried 5-0.
11.
GN 92-59 PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF
APPLICATION FOR TAX ABATEMENT BY
TECNOL MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. -
ORDINANCE NO. 1798, RESOLUTION NO. 92-25
APPROVED
Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to
please come forward.
Mr. Mack Reeve, representing Tecnol, spoke in favor of the request.
No one spoke in opposition to the request.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing.
Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, to approve
Ordinance No. 1798 and Resolution No. 92-25.
Motion carried 5-0.
*12.
GN 92-60 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1774 - ANIMAL CONTROL -
ORDINANCE NO. 1799
APPROVED
*13.
GN 92-61 RATIFICATION OF CONTRACT WITH SCHRICKEL,
ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
APPROVED
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
I
I
May 11, 1992
Page 4
*14.
GN 92-62 AUTOMATIC MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT WITH
HALTOM CI1Y AND RICHLAND HILLS-
RESOLUTION NO. 92-26
APPROVED
*15.
GN 92-63 REVISED AMBULANCE ORDINANCE -
ORDINANCE NO. 1801
APPROVED
16.
GN 92-64 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM
THE NORTHEAST YMCA TO SPONSOR A CARNIVAL
AT THE RICHLAND POINTE MALL
Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet moved to approve the request for seven days.
Motion died for lack of a second.
Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to approve the
request for three days.
Motion carried 5-0.
17.
GN 92-65 CASH MANAGEMENT STUDY
DENIED
Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to deny GN 92-65.
Motion carried 3-2; Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, Councilmen Wood and Welch voting for and
Councilwomen Johnson and Spurlock voting against.
*18.
GN 92-66 PROPER1Y TAX REFUND
APPROVED
*19.
PU 92-15 RATIFY PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF A WELL PUMP
AND MOTOR FOR WELL NO.5 IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE
APPROVED
l-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
May 11, 1992
Page 5
*20.
PAY 92-03 PAYMENT TO EMTECH CORP., AMOUNT $7,065.92
DATE OF OCCURRENCE 11/24/91 (6955 GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY)
APPROVED
21.
CITIZENS PRESENTATION
None.
There was discussion pertaining to a plat of Orange Valley that was denied at the April
22nd City Council meeting.
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to reconsider the plat at
the June 8th meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
Mr. Willard Baker appeared before the Council.
Mr. Baker asked that the Council reconsider Agenda Item No.9 and allow subdivisions
that have had preliminary plat approval to be exempt from the ordinance.
No action was taken by the Council.
Mayor Brown presented Pat Hughes, Fire Department Division Chief, with a Certificate
of Completion for Professional Development Series of Training through the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
22.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to adjourn the meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
Tommy Brown - Mayor
ATIEST:
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CI1Y
COUNCIL OF THE CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CI1Y HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - MAY 19, 1992 - 6:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting to order May 19, 1992, at 6:30 p.m.
Present:
Absent:
ROLL CALL
Tommy Brown
Byron Sibbet
Mack Garvin
Mark Wood
Jo Ann Johnson
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
C.A. Sanford
Jeanette Rewis
Rex McEntire
Greg Dickens
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
City Engineer
Lyle E. Welch
Linda Spurlock
Councilman
Councilwoman
2.
INVOCATION
Councilwoman Johnson gave the invocation.
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4.
PZ 92-13 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING-
CONSIDERATION OF THE REQUEST OF NRH JOINT
VENTURE TO REZONE PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5,
RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION, PHASE ONE, FOURTH FILING
FROM C-l COMMERCIAL TO C-2 COMMERCIAL
(LOCATED AT HIGHWAY 121 AND MESA VERDE TRAIL) -
ORDINANCE NO. 1802
APPROVED
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
May 19, 1992
Page 2
Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor
to come forward.
Ms. Tammie Chambless, representing NRH Joint Venture, spoke in favor of the request.
Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing.
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, to approve Ordinance
No. 1802.
Motion carried 5-0.
5.
PS 92-10 REQUEST OF NRH JOINT VENTURE FOR
REPLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5, RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION,
PHASE ONE, FOURTH FILING
(LOCATED AT STATE HIGHWAY 121 AT MESA VERDE TRAIL)
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve PS 92-10.
Motion carried 5-0.
6.
DISCUSSION OF CALLING A WORK SESSION FOR MAY 26, 1992
Council set a work session for June 8th immediately following the regular Council
meeting.
7.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to adjourn the meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
Tommy Brown - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CI1Y
COUNCIL OF THE CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CI1Y HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - JUNE 1, 1992 - 6:00 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting to order June 1, 1992, at 6:00 p.m.
Present:
Absent:
ROLL CALL
Tommy Brown
Byron Sibbet
Mack Garvin
Lyle E. Welch
Jo Ann Johnson
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Staff:
C.A. Sanford
Rex McEntire
Assistant City Manager
Attorney
Mark Wood
Linda Spurlock
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Rewis
Councilman
Councilwoman
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
City Secretary
2.
INVOCATION
Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet gave the invocation.
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4.
GN 92-67 CANVASSING RUN-OFF ELECTION, COUNCIL PLACE 5
RESOLUTION NO. 92-28
APPROVED
Mayor Brown presented the following resolution:
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
June 1, 1992
Page 2
RESOLUTION NO. 92-28
WHEREAS, on the 30th day of May, 1992 the Run-off Election was held within
the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, for the election of City
Council Place Five; and
WHEREAS, the following candidates for the office received the number of votes
shown opposite their names as follows:
Name of Candidate
Office
Number of Votes
Ray Oujesky
Russ Mitchell
Place 5
Place 5
335
209
WHEREAS, as provided in the City Charter of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, it is the duty of the City Council to canvass the returns and declare the results of
said election; and it appearing that the following candidate should be declared elected to
the office:
Office
Duly Elected Official
Council Place Five
Ray Oujesky
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas, that the following candidate for the office having received a
majority number of votes in the office, be and he is hereby declared elected to the office
named below for and during the term of one year or until the next duly constituted
election is held in said City, being the first Saturday in May, 1993.
Office
Duly Elected Official
Council Place Five
Ray Oujesky
Mayor Pro Tem Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to approve Resolution
No. 92-28.
Motion carried 4-0.
5.
GN 92-68 OATH OF OFFICE
Rex McEntire, Attorney admisted the oath of office to Ray Oujesky.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
June 1, 1992
Page 3
6.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to adjourn the meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
Tommy Brown - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
I
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS LIBRARY BOARD
MINUTES
May 21, 1992
IIIIÞThe North Richland Hills Library Board met in the board room of the library on May 21, at
7 p.m. Present were Jan Daniels, Jay Bradshaw, Kay Schmidt, Mary Shilcutt, Rosemary
Herod, Arlita Hallam, and Brenda Lewis. Absent were Polly Brinkley, Shirley Goolsby, and
Alisa Wood.
I
I
Chairman Jay Bradshaw called the meeting to order. Jan Daniels moved, Rosemary Herod
seconded, and motion carried to approve the minutes of the April 16 meeting.
Included in Library Director Arlita Hallam's report were the following items of interest:
I
On April 15, Deputy City Manager Dennis Horvath met with the library staff to
discuss how to resolve the recent areas of dissension. As a result of this meeting,
staff member Virginia Vermooten received a reprimand. Ms. Vermooten appealed this
reprimand with the NRH Civil Service Commission. At the civil service hearing on
May 6, the reprimand was upheld. On May 7, Ms. Vermooten was offered employment
options by Mrs. Hallam; she chose to be dismissed. The hearing on her dismissal has
been scheduled for June 18. Mrs. Hallam stated that the City Council and city
administration have been very sup~ortive during this personnel-related situation.
I
I
Arlita distributed details of the Summer Reading Program, which begins June 1. She
invited all members to participate as the program is for both children and adults.
I
The revised "Problem Patron" section of the library policies, which was recently adopted
by the board, was approved. Mary Shilcutt moved, Jan Daniels seconded, and motion carried
to adopt the "Problem Patron Policy."
Jan Daniels moved, Kay
at 9 a.m. beginning on
been included in Plans
_meetings.
I Open disc11ssion items included:
I
Schmidt seconded, motion carried to open the library to the public
June 1, 1992. An in-depth discussion of this proposal, which had
of Service since 1989, had been completed at the March and April
I
Rosemary Herod suggested that former board member Brenda Cody be honored for her
service to the board. Arlita Hallam will present Brenda with a plant and a
certificate of appreciation.
I
Jan Daniels reported that the committee she chairs to study library districts in
other states will meet in June. The committee hopes to have enough information to
recommend to County Commissioner Dionne Bagsby a district structure that would work
for Tarrant County.
I
Arlita Hallam invited board to the GED graduation on May 22 at TCU's Daniel Meyer
Coliseum. Approximately 25 graduates will be from the NRHPL Adult Learning Center.
Mayor Tommy Brown will be presenting three scholarships, sponsored by the NRH City
Council and named for Adult Education Coordinator Hazel Lowrance, for $100 each.
I
I
In response to Mary Shilcutt's question on the library's friends group, Friends
President Jan Daniels responded that she hopes the group will become more active in
the areas of fund-raising and project-planning over the next few months. The
membership is approximately so.
I
Jan Daniels discussed a letter she had received from Cate Dixon of the FWPL in
response to Jan's inquiry to Mayor Kay Granger's office on why the NTLS equipment
that was ordered for NRHPL last September through the City of Fort Worth has not
been received. As Ms. Dixon's explanation was unacceptable, Chairman Jay Bradshaw
suggested that board members call Mayor Kay Granger for an explanation of this
delay.
~ The next meeting was scheduled for September 17.
...,seconded, and motion carried to adjourn at 8 p.m.
Brenda Lewis
Jan Daniels moved, Mary Shilcutt
I
Date:
Board Chair:
I
Attested by:
I
Ie J(örth Richland Hills Public Library
I
I
I
I
I
I
i'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
TO:
Library Board
FROM:
Arlita Hallam, Library Director
DATE:
May 28, 1992'
SUBJECT:
9 A.M. LIBRARY OPENING
Dennis Horvath feels he made a commitment to council that the
library would not open at 9 a.m. until fall.
I am sorry that I was not aware of that commitment until today,
but will have to abide by his decision that we delay the earlier
opening until fall.
bl
(817) 581-5700 · 6720 N.E. lOOP 820 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180 · FAX (817) 581-5706
I
'.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Community Development
I
I
~
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Ot r
I
I
I
I
~
~
I
~
6/8192
Council Meeting Date:
"ubject: Public Hearing to consider the request of Herman Smith
& Company to rezone Lots 4-7, Lots '~-'4, and Lots 16-18,
Richland Oaks Addition, from its present zoning classification
of R-1 F.P., R-1 Single Family Residence, C-1 Commercial, and
Existing Right-of-Way to a proposed classification of C-2 Commercial.
PZ 92-14
Agenda Number:
Ordinance No. 1808
Herman Smith & Company is the owner of a twenty acre tract of land between Strummer Drive and Oakridge
Terrace, abutting the Pace development site on the west and Old Towne Shopping Center to the south. They
are requesting to rezone this property from its multiple zoning districts to a unifonn C-2 Commercial.
This property is in an area that is in transition from residential use to commercial use. This is typical of areas
near major freeway interchanges. At the May 14th Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, there were
many citizens who expressed concern over the proposed rezoning of this property. The Planning and Zoning
Commission advised the citizens that the majority of their concerns are issues relating to platting. It should be
noted that before the lots can be built upon, they must be replatted. In this case, State law requires that a
public hearing be held when the replat is submitted for review; those issues should be addressed at that time.
The property under consideration meets all the requirements of the C-2 zoning district as set forth in the
ordinance.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request at their May 14, 1992 meeting.
On June 1, 1992, a petition was submitted protesting the zoning change. According to Section 211.006 of the
Texas Local Government Code, if a proposed change is protested by property owners of 20 percent of the
land area adjacent to and within 200 feet of the proposed change, then an affirmative vote of 3A of the City
Council is required for the change to pass. The Staff is currently checking the petition to determine if it
complies with the State statutes, and will report the findings to the Council at the June 8th meeting.
RECOMMENDA TION
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
«/ /7g~
City Manager
. Frnance Director
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
]
ORDINANCE NO. 1808
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII,
AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9,
1984.
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case Number PZ 92-14 the following described property shall be rezoned from
R-1 F.P., R-1 Single Family Residential, C-1 Commercial, and Existing Right-of-Way to C-2
Commercial.
BEING a tract of land in the E.S. Carder Survey, Tarrant County, Texas and also being Lots 4
through 7, and Lots 12 through 14, and Lots 16 through 18 of Richland Oaks, First Filing, recorded
in Volume 388-6, Page 49, Plat Records of Tarrant County, and also being an addition to the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the northwest corner of Old Towne Square, recorded in Volume 388-193, Page 15,
said point also being in .the east right-of-way line of Strummer Drive (a 50-foot right-of-way);
THENCE North 00 degrees 07 minutes East, along said right-of-way line, a distance of 800.00 feet to
the northwest corner of Lot 7 of said Richland Oaks, First Filing;
THENCE South 89 degrees 53 minutes East, along the north line of Lot 7 and Lot 12 of Said
Richland Oaks, First Filing, a distance of 828.10 feet to the centerline of Oakridge Terrace (a 50-foot
right-of-way);
THENCE South 00 degrees 07 minutes West, along the centerline of Oakridge Terrace, a distance of
31.50 feet to the northwest corner of Richland Oaks Addition, Third Filing as recorded in Volume
388-7, Page 81, Plat Records of Tarrant County;
THENCE South 88 degrees 30 minutes East, along the north line of said Third Filing, a distance of
25.00 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block C, of said addition;
THENCE South 00 degrees 07 minutes West, along the east right-of-way line of Oakridge Terrace,
also being the west line of said lot 1, Block C, a distance of 483.70 feet to the southwest corner of
Lot 1, Block C;
THENCE South 89 degrees 35 minutes East, along the north line of Bridle Path Lane (a 50-foot right-
of-way), a distance of 79.30 feet to the west line of Lot 1 R, Block A, Replat of Richland Oaks as filed
in Cabinet A, Slide 920 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County;
THENCE South 00 degrees 07 minutes West, a distance of 50.00 feet, to a point in the south line of
said Bridle Path Lane;
THENCE North 89 degrees 35 minutes West, along the south line of Bridle Path Lane, a distance of
79.30 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 6, Block A, of said Third Filing;
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
THENCE South 00 degrees 07 minutes West, along the east line of said Oakridge Terrace, a
distance of 700.00 feet to the southwest corner of Lot 3, Block A, of said Third Filing;
THENCE North 89 degrees 35 minutes West, a distance of 25.00 feet to the centerline of Oakridge
Terrace;
THENCE South 00 degrees 07 minutes West, along said centerline a distance of 134.80 feet;
THENCE North 89 degrees 53 minutes West, along the south line of Lot 18 of said First Filing a
distance of 428.10 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 18;
THENCE North 00 degrees 07 minutes East, along the west line of Lot 16, 17, and 18 of said First
Filing, also being the ~ast line of said Old Towne Square, a distance of 600.00 feet to the northwest
corner of Lot 16 and the southwest corner of Lot 15 of said First Filing;
THENCE South 89 degrees 53 minutes East, along the common line between Lot 16 and Lot 15 of
said First Filing, a distance of 403.10 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 15, also being in the
west line of Oakridge Terrace;
THENCE North 00 degrees 07 minutes East, along said west right-of-way, a distance of 200.00 feet
to the southeast corner of Lot 14 of said First Filing;
THENCE North 89 degrees 53 minutes West, along the south line of Lot 14 of said First Filing, a
distance of 403.10 feet to the southwest corner of Lot 14, also being the northeast corner of Lot 4;
THENCE South 00 degrees 07 minutes West, along the east line of said Lot 4, also being the west
line of Lot 15, a distance of 200.00 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 4, also being the
northeast corner of said Old Towne Square;
THENCE North 89 degrees 53 minutes West, along the south line of said Lot 4, also being the north
line of said Old Towne Square, a distance of 400.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and
containing 20.1 acres (873,528 square feet) of land, more or less.
This property is located on Bedford-Euless Road between Strummer Drive and Oakridge Terrace.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14th DAY OF MAY, 1992.
/~IX:~
Secretary Don Bowen
Planning and Zoning Commission
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN
REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ 92-14 IS HEREBY
REZONED C-2 COMMERCIAL THIS 8th DAY OF JUNE, 1992.
Mayor Tommy Brown
City of North Richland Hills
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
MAY 14, 1992
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order
Brock at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
1. PZ 92-14
Dir Community Dev
Building Official
P&Z Coordinator
ABSENT:
James Brock
David Barfield
Don Bowen
Ron Lueck
Pat Marin
Wayne Moody
Barry LeBaron
Steve Pence
Clayton Husband
Don Collins
Paul Miller
ATION OF THE MINUTES
IL 23, 1992 Ms. Pat Marin made the motion to approve the minutes as
written. The motion was seconded by Mr. Ron Lueck, and the
Chairman Brock stated that due to the large amount of
people wishing to speak on Item 5 (PZ 92-14) of the agenda,
that item would be the first item considered for the
convenience of those present.
Public Hearing to consider the request of Herman Smith &
Company to rezone Lots 4-7, Lots 12-14, and Lots 16-18,
Richland Oaks Addition, from its present zoning
classifications of R-1 F.P., R-1 Single Family Residential, C-1
Commercial, and Existing Right of Way to a proposed
classification of C-2 Commercial.
Chairman Brock stated that the Commission will only be
considering the zoning of the property, whether commercial is
the highest and best use. He stated that other issues will be
addressed at the time of platting.
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for
those wishing to speak in favor of the request to come
forward.
Ross Calhoun, Herman Smith & Company, 1903 Central Drive,
Bedford, came forward to speak. He stated they were
requesting a zoning change on approximately 20 acres,
bounded by Strummer, State Highway 121, and the Pace site.
He stated they were seeking C-2 because commercial is the
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes, page 2
May 14, 1992
highest and best use of the property. Mr. Calhoun stated that
their studies show that the area will support commercial
development. He stated he was aware that they had
neighbors along Strummer, and he presented a landscape
plan showing a berm, wall, and landscaped strip along
Strummer.
Doug Gilliland, 4901 Strummer, came forward to speak. He
stated that there were a number of meetings among the
neighbors, and that they agreed the area was changing. He
stated that there was a great deal of concern about the traffic
on Strummer, about debris building up, and about vandalism.
Mr. Gilliland stated his concern over property values. He
asked what feeling the Commission has about potential
requests from neighbors to change the zoning of their
property from residential to commercial.
Chairman Brock agreed that the area is in transition. He
stated it is not out of line for neighbors to request rezoning.
Mr. Gilliland stated that most people oppose the zoning
request. He stated that the problem with the neighbors
wanting to change their zoning is that all the neighbors don't
feel that way.
Chairman Brock stated that they would welcome citizens at
the pre-session to sit down and talk about what could be
done.
Mr. Jim Laux, 4817 Strummer, came forward to speak. He
stated his concerns about property values and traffic on
Strummer. He stated that he sees the only salvation of
property values is through commercial use. He stated he
wanted the proposed center to face Strummer.
There being no others wishing to speak in favor of the
request, Chairman Brock called for those wishing to speak
against the request to come forward.
Harvey Greenwald, 5016 Strummer, came forward to speak.
He stated that he is not opposed to commercial development
of the property, but is opposed to the zoning. He stated
zoning should include a full site plan and environmental
impact statement.
Chairman Brock stated that the city does not require an
environmental impact statement.
Mr. Greenwald stated that the stated and federal governments
do. He stated Strummer should be a five-lane road. He
stated that the shopping center will help only if it is
successful. Mr. Greenwald stated that Mr. Smith should make
Strummer a five-lane road as a condition of zoning approval.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes, page 3
May 14, 1992
Chairman Brock stated that the Commission is only looking at
zoning. He stated that platting will address the other issues.
Joe McCarthy, 5001 Strummer, came forward to speak. He
asked if citizens will have input in the platting issues.
Chairman Brock stated yes.
Mr. McCarthy asked that the zoning be approved only on the
following conditions: that Strummer become a five-lane road,
that traffic lights are put on each end of Strummer, that the
proposed development face Strummer, and that residents be
granted C-2 zoning on their property at the time of sale. Mr.
McCarthy stated he saw no signs posted along Strummer. He
stated that the master plan addresses traffic along Strummer.
He stated that the Commission should consider postponing
the request until the residents along Strummer meet.
Alfred Stanford, 5101 Pearl, came forward to speak. He
stated he was concerned about flood problems when the
development goes in.
Chairman Brock stated that once the plat is submitted, the
Commission will know what the drainage effects will be. He
stated that their job tonight, as instructed by the City Charter,
is to decide whether the property should be zoned
commercial.
Mr. Stanford stated that most people want some guarantee
that they won't be left out of those decisions.
Mr. Lueck asked Mr. LeBaron to go over the process of what
happens after zoning.
Mr. LeBaron stated that the next step is to submit a plat. He
stated that before a recommendation on the plat is made to
the Council, all drainage, water, sewer, and other issues are
required to be satisfied.
Mr. Stanford stated his concern that if the street were
widened, it would ruin his propeny by cutting off part of his
lot.
Mr. LeBaron stated that the City can't pre-design a street
system without knowing what the developer is actually going
to do with the lot in terms of the number of lots, etc.
Mr. Stanford stated that Strummer could be a cut-through
area for Loop 820 when it is widened.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes, page 4
May 14, 1992
Mr. LeBaron stated that the Commission tried to get the
neighborhood to support a plan concerning traffic on
Strummer, but no consensus could be reached.
Harriett Greenwald, 5016 Strummer, came forward to speak.
She stated that she wanted the zoning postponed until all
issues discussed tonight are resolved.
Chairman Brock stated that those are platting issues and that
only zoning is being considered tonight.
Ms. Greenwald asked why the zoning can't be postponed.
She asked why it had to be done tonight.
Chairman Brock stated that it was requested at this time.
Ms. Marin asked if Ms. Greenwald was requesting that the
property be platted before rezoned.
Ms. Greenwald stated yes.
Mr. Bowen stated that it would be difficult to do. He stated
that any owner would not go to the expense required to plat
under the presumption that they would get zoning. He stated
they would not spend the money on platting if they could not
use the plan.
Mr. Barfield stated that there will another public hearing on
platting. He stated platting is just as important as zoning and
that the public will have ample time to discuss those issues.
He stated that in the mean time, the neighbors should get
together and arrive at a consensus concerning those issues.
Ms. Greenwald asked if it were true that once the property
was rezoned, that they could do whatever they want on the
property.
Mr. Bowen stated no, that they still must meet the subdivision
ordinance requirements concerning their zoning.
Ann Robinson, 8308 Jerrie Jo Drive, came forward to speak.
She stated that some people were left out that should be
considered, those people being residents on Jerrie Jo, Pearl,
and Jennings. She stated she did not receive formal
notification of the case. She requested that the request be
tabled until neighbors get together to discuss it further.
Chairman Brock stated that she did not receive a letter
because she was out of the 200 foot notification area
required by state law.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes, page 5
May 14, 1992
Doug Randolph, 5017 Strummer, came forward to speak. He
requested that the case be tabled. He asked the Commission
if pride of ownership means anything to anyone. He asked
how much does anyone personally benefit from a shopping
center. He asked for five good reasons that this shopping
center should be built.
Chairman Brock asked if these were rhetorical questions.
Mr. Randolph stated he was asking because he wanted to
know. He stated his concern over property values. He asked
who the Commission and the City Council really represented.
Mr. Gene Dixon, 8321 Jerrie Jo Drive, came forward to speak.
He stated he doesn't understand the impact of the change on
his own life. The stated the change will definitely have an
impact on his way of life. He stated the neighbors haven't
had the opportunity to give the Commission or City Council
their impressions of what the impact will be. He stated the
zoning should be tabled.
Harvey Greenwald appeared again before the Commission.
He stated that he doesn't think postponing the decision is
unreasonable.
Eunice Price, 5105 Pearl, came forward to speak. She stated
she did not receive notice of the meeting. She stated her
concern about property values.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Brock
closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Moody asked if the request were tabled, what would it
accomplish.
Chairman Brock stated probably nothing.
Ms. Marin stated that the Commission is not changing the
zoning tonight, it does not have that power.
Mr. Barfield stated that the Commission looked at that
neighborhood several years ago, and the consensus was that
it was going downhill. He stated that neighbors were invited
to meetings to discuss what should be done around the area.
He stated they spent a lot of time studying the issue. Mr.
Barfield stated that the neighbors were spilt on whether the
area should go to commercial or be left alone. He stated he
would strongly recommend a screening fence and berm along
Strummer with absolutely no access from Strummer without
full consensus of the citizens on Strummer. He stated he
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes, page 6
May 14, 1992
believes that commercial is the highest and best use for the
property.
Mr. Lueck stated he was surprised that some citizens wanted
the development to face Strummer. He stated that it was
apparent in previous studies that there was no consensus on
the direction of the area.
Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PZ 92-14 with the
condition that at the time of platting the issues discussed
tonight are addressed at that time. Mr. Moody seconded the
motion.
Mr. Barfield added that the Commission wants to hear input
from citizens during the mean time. He stated the
Commission was willing to attend meetings with citizens to
help resolve those issues.
The motion carried 5-1, with Chairman Brock, Mr. Barfield, Mr.
Lueck, Ms. Marin, and Mr. Moody voting for; and Mr. Bowen
voting against.
Chairman Brock stated that the City Council will hear this
case on June 8, 1992. Chairman Brock called a five minute
recess.
The Commission reconvened with the Chairman Brock, Mr.
Bowen, Mr. Lueck, Ms. Marin, and Mr. Moody, present, and
Mr. Barfield absent.
2. PZ 91-27
Consideration of Comprehensive Land Use Plan for
of North Richland Hills.
Mr. Lueck made to motion to approv
recommend the Plan to the City ncil.
the motion, and the motion ried 5-0.
3. PZ 92-12
Public Hearing to sider the request of Co naco , Inc., to
rezone Lot 1 Rock B, and parts of Lots 1 and 2, Block B,
Richland s Addition, from its present zoning classification
of C- ommercial to a proposed classification of C-1
mercial with a Special Use Permit.
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for
those wishing to speak to come forward.
Mr. Joe Malazo, Conoco, Inc., came forward to speak. He
stated that the Texas Highway Department was taking part of
his lot to widen the road, and that Conoco will be building a
new convenience store/gas station on the lot and would like
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
it
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
FACT SHEET
Case No. PZ 92-14
Hearing Dates: 5/14/92 PZ
6/08/92 CC
REQUEST: R-1 F.P., R-1, C-1 and Existing Right-of-Way to C-2
APPLICANT: Herman J. Smith & Company
PROPERTY OWNER: same
LOCATION AND SIZE:
20.1 acres (873,528 square feet) generally located at the intersection of State
Highway 121, Bedford-Euless Road, and Oakridge Terrace. The property is
between Strummer Drive and Oakridge Terrace.
PROPOSED USE: Retail Center
ALLOWED USES: Retail Stores and Shops
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Rectangular shaped. Walker Branch runs down middle of property from north
to south, with many trees lining the creek. Savings and Loan association is
at the south-east end of the property. The site terrain gently rolls from north
to south.
ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
R-1: existing single family homes
State Highway 121 and Frontage Road
C-2: Pace Development; R-1: existing home, occupied
R-1: existing single family homes; C-1: Old Towne Square
shopping center
DRAINAGE:
According to FEMA maps, a portion of this property lies in the 100- and 500-
year flood plain of Walker Branch. The approximate base flood elevation
shown on the map is 567 feet.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
re
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ 92-14, page 2
THOROUGHFARE PLAN:
This site accesses State Highway 121 frontage road and Bedford-Euless
Road, an M5U roadway: Minor Arterial, 5 lanes, undivided.
ZONING HISTORY:
PZ 91-21: Request by Herman Smith to rezone various parcels on what is
now the Pace Development site, east of the site under
consideration. The change was approved.
PZ 91-24: Request by Cameo Development to rezone Lot 15 of Richland
Oaks from R-1 to C-2. This lot is surrounded by the site under
consideration on the north, west, and south sides. The change
was approved.
PZ 85-118: Request by Herman Smith to rezone Lots 16-18 from R-1 to C-1.
The change was approved. These lots are included in the
current request (PZ 92-14).
PZ 85-126: Request by Sea Galley Restaurant on parts of Lots 1 and 2 for a
Specific Use Permit for alcohol sales. The change was
approved. The Sea Galley site was replatted, and is now
occupied by the Old Towne Square shopping center. (PS 85-73)
PZ 84-24: Request by Herman Smith to rezone Lots 3 and 13, Block A,
from R-1 to C-1, just east of the site under consideration. The
change was approved.
PLATTING HISTORY:
PS 91-26: Request by Herman Smith for Replat of Lot 3R, which is now the
Pace Development site. The replat was approved.
PS 85-73: Request by Burk Collins on Lots 1 Rand 2R, which is now
occupied by the Old Towne Square shopping center. The raplat
was approved.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
re
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
TH.
A
8.66 AC
~
----3--
TExtAN TRAIL N
"e
6 1 .7
8 .-J
H'
«
"j ex:
. '" .-
9 UJ
a
ex:
UJ
>
10
«
en
UJ
~
11
12 g ~
~
13
",>''4
EPT
H
'; .
18 15 17
2 14 18
19
19 9
20 13
21 12 20 1
8
5
22 11 21 ~----
I
I
b Œ
23 10 a:
a: -~~---- 0
t- -
8
4 24 ·1 9 8
0 ~
« -~ ~
> 0
8 w 0
Z -.J
LLJ
9 ~
10 27 I
26
11 29 27
TR
30 28
fHi
¡ Þ- .-...,
- '- -
31 3 29
.32 30 71
- 33
'~1c~~
I
I
I
>~
-/
~
pz. -92 -14-
~
: /
I ~/
~\
c
3 ;
\
\
\ .
\ {~.
\ .
85
TRACT j~
[.~ r_
1
1
I
.\
~lldnV'
\
- -.....,-
~. I
'\ 1fl'J , ~ I
/. ø IIJ ~ " \" ':Iii
\. ~ ~ ~.!?,'
~ I \.:Jl H':I \ 1.1,1:11 lJrM I
_ '" ~¥ r..-. "- -
~ ~~, ~ ~~D.. IT I -
15 I" ~~ I Ó
i= C/) -, '"1 ...100£. .. ....,"'~
r _ _ - - -X--:;)I~-I
LL- ' ""-,, 1ft ~~.
(.) "I 41:--
-; -
.~ b ~ ¿;
r- '-
. "
7::)~ ~
·0(/)00
I1\. I. ;
'- .
\. ~ ,~
I
(.)
+ ~
-
~
-
,
N
ó)
~
\
~~~
~
~
-~
-
I
U r -
-
-
-
I
1-
~--
, ~
~
~
~
~
"lH
~'4'
I
I
I
q~
I I
- .
o
~ I ~~ ,
, U~
I~ \. t
I <a=- -.( ~, I I -
J.... ~ ~,.- - ....... I ·
/
7&
~~ ~K - --. 1\.4~'rj-,' ~~~,~ ~~ ~:~ · ~
.. . "- ~ .-: It \. ..~ cr- ~ "(. "I.:"''' I
" ~~. I "-" ~ ~ ~~
-~ ,
~I ~ '< ~ ~ T I ~ \.'\:\. " ,,""'~ - -~' ~
ll~~ ~ '" '.) I iîî - ~ I ~"\\. "''' '\i'-. '\ '-6~d CD ¡A-
I '- " ~ ~ 11 - 3A H: ] I I I If ... rí> '7 , ~~
I ~~ ~ ~k I I '" I ; ~ r .-.~
~II _ 1_ I ~ ~ ~I I I J~~ l'~.
~I _ b ~ r~ I T ·Fs[..~' -~ I Innt~f\--m"":- ~ -~
I I -....,. ...(J.... .. tt\ - .II (.)
U I * _ I I 1~L. I I I ¡ - I - If
~ ::> 1 I ' 'Cf . I -, I t1 , ^ ~ ; I
1111 · I ¡ ~
-: ~\ I I I r 1 l' ~ I ¡ T'-- ~
" -N ~ ~ t-:: ìl'ef . I -~~ I I
c: .... <.:, ~ " <: I I I .~ OM ~ ---,6. I 7' ~
~ ~I 0 I I \ \1 I ~ I ¡ ,II _ ~ I - ~ u en
I~__;I 1- I 11- I Ti~ ~~ I I (],'ef o,-~~~'- ~
~ .... .' a
I I I ... II
',\~' ~.....
I
\
o
..CANNON DR ; :e._~
...... . . :e..~
G-? C4U ····4, U;.
~ - . -- .
--- .
-.-
:--. :, '
. -.
"" : c -..
.::)
.).~
N
. .
.
.
..
..
M4U ¡ i·i
i I
I !! i
~------1 ~~.
I .
, I
..
!
-- f ---
""'_, 11 ~!
. ~r
~ ~\ ooo.C" .... : ..~ ~.J
- ~-~ï ~ [~~ ~-~ ,¡ : I ~1 ~ . - ..~:. ~ ~
. __~..'- ____~ f k~----LJ [~. y-. -,-/~ .. ~-- ~'
._~ ~ _-< 1f.:- -. '-+-~ ' J ---- :--+---< ~ ·
~ ~_~.> ~;__" lu~OO~ : '----' . '
.~ifmlwO-~' ~~ : ~
~
.,
¢::: t\;)~
......
.~~
. ~. .. ~ 1 - '-.. .. - # 1 . . '"""
-=: ~-----"-'- . -----fl - " . -----r< '
. ;~~J ::1: .~¡ ~~~
~ r-: ' ~"1 : ----~ . , ~- :. .---
- --t ~,.0f I." < - \ "- . I ~ . ' - ~
.~~ : L.~I~· \~: "'- "- . ~.~ <
-...' \ I ~~, .' ~ : '
~1----'< ~_ :'-'~._." -. ---= ï~ i ' \ ".
. ... l ,: .--. , ~: .. " . t :
. ~.l · ~ I \.---. '1 .. ;
_ __._. ,~ ' \ . - J I ' """ .
_ __ ~ '- .-? -' _ -' _ ¡ <,. t, I
. ~ ~ . <' '(" /'.-A.. ~ L~ ,
I---j í" -'" - __.J<. ~ ~ -- -~
~ ;----r _ f---Lrrr- ~_. --
----
, I
J i
r-Cii~- -
!~:.~
_1 .
---
---=--:.-~ ..''/
w
L~
-1 f-
!
)f--
}- .j
, ,.. ~ /)
r : ...t- i /-.
j : ---~J: : I
¡: -.~..
~ ~ f-~
- ----- - ..----
P2 'j2 - J+-
I SE\T~ BY:
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tt
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
8-23-91 ~:OlP~ :CITY Of \.RICH.HILLS~
12146380~47:# 2/ 2
P2. q:z - ,.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAHD HILLS
APPL I CATION FOR ZONINC CHARGE
PRESENT ZONING: R-1 F.P., R-1, C-1, and Existing Right-of-Way
CHANGE TO: C-2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit nAil
NEW OWNER:
NAME Herman Smith & Co.
PBON! (817) 540-4942
ADDRESS 1903 Central Dr., Suite 403, Bedford, Tx 76021
APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR A LETtER FRCK THE own
GIVING HIM PERMISSION TO REQUEST THIS ZONING CHANGE.
PREVIOUS OWNER: NAME Various Owners
PHONE
ADDRESS
DEVELOPER :
NAME Herman Smith & Co.
PBORE (817)540-4942
ADDRESS 1903 Central Dr., Suite 403, Bedford, Tx 76021
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR NAME Carter & Burgess, Inc.
PBONE (214) 638-0145
ADDRESS 7950 Elmbrook Dr., Suite 250, Dallas, Tx 75247
REASON FOR ZONING
CHANGE To allow eventual development of Richland Oaks
Retail Center
PROPOSED USE Retail Center
ZONING FEE: $300.00
COPIES REQUIRED 32 copies of plat or survey
FILING DEADLINE l~th of each month to b. heard following month
/ê/.;¿~
ianature of
Ross Calhoun
ADril 13, 1992 Vice President
Date Herman Smith & Co.
!I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
It
I
I
May 17, 1992
City of North Richland Hills
P .0. Box 82~ 09
North Richland Hills, Texas í6182-~09
Care of: Mr. J. Clayton Husband
Planning and Zoning Coordinator
Dear Sir,
I attended and spoke at the N.H.H. Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting on May 14, 1992 concerning rezoning propertys facing Strummer
Dr., case PZ 92-14. I stated my interest as property owner at 4817
Strummer Dr. and my concern was for fair treatment as a property
owner. I spoke neither for or against the rezoning.
After the public imput portion of the meeting two commissioners re-
sponded directly to my imput, consistant and persistant public requests
to table the motion were ignored, and the commission voted to recomend
the rezoning action be approved. I do not feel communication was ach-
ieved at this meeting, the public principally spoke at the commission
and then some commissioners politely responded at the public. No
discourse was allowed.
The points responded to by the commissioners require further commun-
ication and understanding.
First, I was the one that starteled some of the commissioners by request-
ing the development face Strummer Dr. with principal access points along
Strummer. I base my reasoning on experience. Lot 3 on Strummer Dr.
faces a failed and choked off development. It is residential property
adjacent to failed commercial property with the residentially degrad=
ing aspects of traffic, safety, security, noise, and litter. Access to
or from my property is extremely dangerous and cunbersome, partic-
ularlly from the South. A neighborhood crime watch would be a farce
with constant police alarms considering some 95% of the traffic on this
"residential" street is transome commercial or cut-through. Therefore,
I own residential property with some perc~ntage of residential safety
and security; some percentage of residential market value. Not the ob-
jective or intent when purchased in 1958. Further fenced, burmed, segre-
gated, and choked off commercial development along Strummer Dr. will
simply compound this problem degrading the alresdy degraded percentage
of residential or market quality.
I agree with the Planning and Zoning Commission's recomendation that
the heighest and bast use of the property addressed by Herman Smith &
Co. request is C 2 Commercial. I disagree with another fenced, burmed,
and segregated confined shopping center stuck in the middle of a access
delima awaiting long term highway and street construction. I disagree
with blocking off potential patrons from the center by not allowing ac=
cess from the North and West markets. I want to agree to a successful
enviorment on Strummer Dr., be it residential or commercial. I feel that
only one enviorment or the other will generate full and best property
utilization.
Second, another commissioner noted the neighborhood quality on Strummer
Dr. and in Richland Oaks Addition in general was deteriorating. This
is true. I can site several instances where homeowners have reduced
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
May 17, 1992
City of N.R.H.
dreams and improvements to m~n~mun operating budgets sometimes even
diminishing their existing propertys. Their rational is simple, im=
provements and repairs cost 100% of funtion but once completed are
immediately reduced in value to some percentage of that cost by the
residential quality delima existing in this neighborhood. I can
only see this trend continuating and accelerating.
Yet another commissioner expressed concerns over prior Planning and
Zoning attempts to contact and servey Richland Oaks residents concern-
ing street configurations and traffic flows. There is an air of dis-
trust and an "I told you so" attitude among these homeowners because
of their experience concerning the existing failed center. Also, no
proposal was viewed as a solution to the parifial trafic making access
to the residential area safe and efficient.
In summary, this area can not escape the progression of time. It has
and will continue to be enveloped more and more deeply by progress.
To isolate this progress from these homeowners and from the City of
North Richland Hills is not only unfair, it is wrong. As I see it,
even the commercial developers are at much greater risk.
Sinc~ly,
. \. ~
I >/()Yl ~c·t.
<·~ames .r: La
817 292-9102
Copys to:
:Neighbors
Herman Smith Co.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Community Development
Department: _ Council Meeting Date:
S b t Public Hearing to consider the request of Rita Jo Hazel A d N
u jec: to rezone Tract 4Pl B, A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1630 gen a umber:
from its present zoning classification of R-7-MF Multi-Family
Residential to C-2 Commercial. This property is located on
the east side of Flory Street, approximately 400 feet south of Glenview Drive.
6/8/92
PZ 92-10
I
Ordinance No. 1805
Ms. Hazel is the owner of a tract of land which is located in two zoning districts: C-2
Commercial and R-7-MF Multi Family. Ms. Hazel is requesting the rezoning of a small,
wedge-shaped strip of land that abuts her property on the south to C-2 in order for the
property to have consistent zoning. The strip of land is between Ms. Hazel's south property
line and the north line of a 35' drainage channel. ABC Wrecker Service currently operates
a wrecker service on this lot, with temporary outdoor storage of automobiles.
The property under consideration is too small for any independent use, being only 37 feet
across at its widest point. Ms. Hazel is currently platting her lot and the wedge-shaped
piece into a single lot. Ms. Hazel submitted her plat for review in early March, but her
engineer has taken no action on the application at this time.
The tract being considered for rezoning is land left over after the construction of a drainage
channel, and the small triangular piece of property currently carries R-7-MF zoning. The
surrounding uses are primarily commercial ones, although some of the properties to the
south are still zoned R-7-MF. The area along Flory Street seems to be in transition from
residential to commercial uses.
~
~
~
,
, Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
I
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request at their April
23, 1992 meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Avai lable
t Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1805
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII,
AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9,
1984.
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HilLS BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 92-10 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-7-
MF Multi-Family Residential to C-2 Commercial.
BEING known as tract 4P1B in the A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1630, North Richland Hills,
Tarrant County, Texas, and being further described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron pin at the northwest corner of the herein described tract of land, said pin
being in the east right-of-way line of Flory Street, and said pin being in the northeast corner of a 5
foot wide street dedication to the City of North Richland Hills recorded in Volume 6357, Page 848;
THENCE East 150.21 feet to an iron pin, said pin being on the southwesterly line of a 35 foot
drainage easement dedicated to the City of North Richland Hills recorded in Volume 6357, Page
851 ;
THENCE South 73 degrees 14 minutes 23 seconds West, along said southwesterly line, 130.04 feet
to an iron pin;
THENCE continuing along the north line of said 35 foot drainage easement, West 25.69 feet to an
iron pin, said pin being in the said east right-of-way line of Flory Street;
THENCE North, along said right-of-way line, 37.50 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing
0.07571 acres of land (3298 square feet).
This property is located on the east side of Flory Street, approximately 400 feet south of Glenview
Drive.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 23rd DAY OF APRIL, 1992.
Planni
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN
REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ 92-09 IS HEREBY
REZONED C-2 THIS 8th DAY OF JUNE, 1992.
Mayor
City of North Richland Hills
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
--
M1~U"lW~~ U¥ "!WH.IS .K~\ju~ MBBi'INØ 9F TIIB
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
APRIL 23, 1992
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. PZ 92-10
2. PZ 92-11
The meeting was call to order by
Chairman James B ck at 7: 30 p. m.
Dir Community Dev
Building Official
ABSENT
James Brock
David Barfield
Don Bowen
Don Collins
Ron Lueck
Pat Marin
Paul Miller
Barry LeBaron
Steve Pence
Wayne Moody
ION OF THE MINUTES
9, 1992
Ms. Pat Marin made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Don Collins, and the
motion carried 7 -0.
Public Hearing to consider the request of
Rita Jo Hazel to rezone Tract 4PIB, A. G.
Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1630 from its
present zoning classification of R-7-MF
Multi-Family Residential to C-2 Commercial.
This property is located on the east side of
Flory Street, approximately 400 feet south
of Glenview Drive.
Chairman Brock stated the cases heard this
evening are scheduled to be heard by the
City Council on June 8, 1992.
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing
and asked those wishing to speak in favor
of the request to come forward. There
being none, Chairman Brock asked those
wishing to speak against the request to
come forward. There being none, Chairman
B rock closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ
92-10. Mr. Barfield seconded, and the
motion carried 7-0.
Pu blic Hearing to c 0
o rezone part of Tract 12, s.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
FACT SHEET
Case No. PZ 92-10
Hearing Dates: 4/23/92 P&Z
6/08/92 CC
REQUEST: R-7-MF to C-2
APPLICANT: Rita Jo Hazel
PROPERTY OWNER: Rita Jo Hazel
lOCATION AND SIZE:
0.07571 acre tract located approximately 400 feet south of Glenview Drive
with the address being 4023 Flory Street
PROPOSED USE: Continued use as wrecker service with adjacent lot to the north
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Tract is small wedge-shaped, grass-covered tract with a 35' drainage ditch to
the south.
ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE:
North C-2: Wrecker service
South R-7-MF: Truck/RV body shop (under construction)
East R-7-MF: Residential structures
West R-7-MF: Electric contractor with outside storage
DRAINAGE:
According to FEMA maps, this property lies in the 100-year flood plain of
Mackey Creek.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN:
Flory Street - R2U Residential street, 2-lane undivided.
ZONING HISTORY:
PZ 88-2:
Request to change from C-2 to 1-2 on the property surrounding
the site under consideration. Change was denied.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ 89-2: Request to change from C-2 to 1-2 on the surrounding property.
Included in this request was an additional lot requesting a
change from R-7-MF to C-2. The change on the property from
C-2 to 1-2 was denied, but the change on the lot from R-7-MF to
C-2 was approved.
SA 89-14: Request to vary from outdoor storage requirements in C-2
district in wrecker yard north of site. Request was approved
subject to storage not exceeding 20% of lot.
PLATTING HISTORY:
The property is not currently platted. The property is being platted into one
lot with the lot to the north. Ms. Hazel filed a short form plat application in
early March 1992, but no additional action has been taken on the plat by Ms.
Hazel or her engineer. The plat has not come before the Planning and
Zoning Commission at this time.
, 1~
16
15R
\ TA
204
\ 38 A
14
13
I
12
\1
t
\
11
I
~~C
5C 8A
58
7K
5A
6 6K
4.t
17
5
16
6
a: 15
0
7 <í
~ 14
a:
8 <t
u
13
12
11
10A
- -
Ie..
J A
18
2R1
2R2
v t-A.
().Cf' 1
3
\
4
lor the use of
5sumes no responsibility
Ithan the use intended.
~
5
3
4
TA 7A2
5
>-
a:
o
.-J
1
\ S\;
~
10
8
,Zg
~,
6
7
8
11
5
9A
GLENVIEW DR
- -
A t _6_
0
E
F
G1
CROSS
12K
- -
12C 128
~~Ç\
3
TR 4K
TR 4N
1
TR 4N1
12A
4
>-
a:
o
~
l.1-
a:
o
(f)
(!)
t!)
TR 4T 1 :::)
a:
u
en
9
( ,
,
N
w
FEr
E
MET£'
s
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\--.
U~
UJ
0'
~-
~
I \JJ
,
)-
I ~
0
-1
LL
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
TO ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE PREMISES SURVEYED
':&.
l.
-
-.J
s..
-:1
\,i.-
,r:
I~~C~ 4fC'3
(
t-
. r
(,
...J
=t..-~"
. ~O. :.
c
-
~ --
_~I
.....1
...'') ;
., - -----
~
'..... t
'_ I
~ I ......,c. ,.~ -: .-
j
..,. 0.0 75 ;'
..
W-
e
7-
Ò
Wf.~T
'. t>. (";I (..
. y ~~ ' t-..4
,.,,~ '"' (, "'J S 1
"D\ .
f,(- -'
"t- í.,.~ \
f·· -
o
¡~. t.~ I
~~"E Y O~
O.O'ISl 1 Å.cf<~ ""~AC.T OF" L...~.~ D
QÙ"T OF T~ E.
~,Gt. ,,JA.Lt'E It ~U~"E '( , Ab~TfL4C.' ~6E~ ,c.~O
c 'T' Qf ~T~ ~tc.....~tJO HH..L- <:J
T"~~NT CÞuNT"f, ,f't~~
. "~T-. / ' -~.-
I ,I \
/ \
...0~, ¡
'~;;~
.,~~
~
-
;"}---I- J I~'- i ---" r===1 ~
I · \' -' 1/ i1 I 4\-..... -¡ _ ~ 1--1
~ - ----'- :E T I=> , I I
' \.'-' t1 - 1l I I II IV.:.::-.I _ lit ~
J t>.. " I r r _I _ I _ _ (~,y
- ~ "-.., - - Ufi IVEI - I _1 r- 1- I .A..
- 1- I ì ~
f-'~IJ: C~~ ( I ~_Iljl ' - O~\.. R-7- ~ ·c 2
1 ,~ - - ~ U ""d':~ ~ _
i ,.. œ --r - -- r t=. C-2. - - it'.ð ME:' ~
-;' . I r - , ., ~_I 1570 (J ...t" r~ 1456
' - --- "~J 1549' r T I .'
I . I a R:..3 ;( R05S I ~ _ I C
SITe. - ~~... ~ ,_~ 116r ~.~ ~t-~ 1168,_
L 'R':~J·JI-45,,~ .--. R' "'1 I'TlE"_ Þ'f. ,.,
. . - , -, -.. - 'f.u - - ~.J..
' ... .J ..r- = -~C-2':P"...~ n~ 1- ~ .),.~
,r--, I Y II I' 'I,. c:t '{'
' ~ I ..... C-2 1372 "u, _ _>,~
a: --I ~r~~ r ~
-- I~ R LJ L' I I L- - - " ./
C - 2,J ~8-= L .J~'I_ 1_ ,,--;1 c- 2 1 0.
--;* 'P'( J - 1- 1 "IIII r"{ll rvlr 9 127 B_ C-I
I 1~~~··2 ~-~I It J~ su*
---' ..... Q. 1* _, V 50~ I ... >-,.... .
.-,." -r ~- I ~~~
" - - I ~". C 2
. '.. C - 2 - "",y l..l'tA DRCL' I / _
~ \~ - - --1 ..œ:..1 V ... t.626
~I ~~·'v~~r "-:"--=-"'il-~J ~
¡--2
¡ 11 I II L =_ .
NOr1'" 1 ~~s 1,þ.
/1 I I~ _d ~.. ~
fW'-rlr I I J~ _v_ =-~~'
',. C:T cr ___
. - l I
. ---
! -T-
'11 ~ I I ~¡- ~J LY
n I I I I I 1_ L/
-T I I I I I r:::::7'
I I
I
-
f
,r-
I
[ ~~
~ "
-,J
I~· '\~
~~
ÍI'
/t
I
Ie
I
I
-I
C-2
1399
.\
-
-
C--I
-- --
1 I .
I, I
1;
~.
P2 92 - JD
\.'" .I
; "
\
I
I
O' ". 50e
~
. ',.....
.J
.... .'.._.''\...........I'...;t'..~:..:.:. t
Þ" .J..
...... - ..._...;,
... ,
" '·'~t~.. I
~.~
_. '''','\ r ,
: ~\' "
I . .
. .....
I,
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
re
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
p~ 92- /0
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
PRESENT ZONING:
({-l-MF
C--t.
CHANGE TO:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: l'«A"+ ~ P \ ß . A.~. w..II",. S"'t'v" r I A.. 'l~' ,..)0. , <. '10
C.\A(tENT
-NeW OWNER: NAME ~;h Jo K~.&( PHONE ~~+- ;z.c",--
ADDRESS 4o).~ PfOf)' S~. t=b,.+'4Jo"~ J 1;( 7~ ( &0
APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR A LETTER FROM THE OWNER GIVING HIM
PERMISSION TO REQUEST THIS ZONING CHANGE.
PREVIOUS OWNER: NAME
PHONE --
ADDRESS
DEVELOPER:
NAME
PHONE
ADDRESS
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: NAME e,,,~+ 1-lc.J~c..,~ C....,..I~:..~ e"3ì..Cf~~~~ 8~1-1'7'J
ADDRESS Sio 1- C Mìclw-r it". ~,.l- Wð"'~ í)(. 7' If ì
REASON FOR ZONING
CHANGE Tf''''<+ h 4-.0 s..-..' 1 +0 "'~~ AM" ì S ~i"'j
A .fj "Co" " ~ p"'O f<C.~ ry !:fa I/I...J C - 1.. ~ ¡.,...
rl..t+-J \.4J i It.
ð~c. '6+.
PROPOSED USE
ZONING FEE:
$300.00
COPIES REQUIRED
33 copies of plat or survey
FILING DEADLINE
15th of each month to be heard following month
Date
a/31 ¡?fl,..~\
,
/
--- //
~ ...". Ò r I z -1 J'Z.Ö
I·
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Community Development
6/8/92
Council Meeting Date:
Subject: Public hearing to consider the request of Bill Lightfoot Agenda Number:
to rezone part of Tract 12, s. Richardson Survey, Abstract
1266, from its present zoning classification of AG Agriculture
to C-1 Commercial. This property is located at 7714 Davis Boulevard.
~
~
~~ Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
e Operating Budget
I
I
PZ 92..11
Ordinance No. 1806
Mr. Bill Lightfoot is requesting to rezone pan of his propeny from AG to C-1. Mr. Ughtfoot currently
operates a fishing pond on the propeny. He is requesting commercial zoning to allow him to operate a
restaurant.
Part of Mr. Lightfoot's property Is already zoned C-1 Commercial. This part fronts Davis Boulevard (see
drawing). The back portion is zoned AG Agriculture. There Is an existing structure on the north property
line of the back section which serves Mr. Lightfoot's fishing operation.
At the April 23rd Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, several neighbors expressed concern over the
operation of the fishing ponds. They were concerned over the drainage problems being created and the
amount of noise generated by customers using the facility. It was the opinion of the Commission that the
City would have greater regulatory control over the facility If It were zoned commercial rather than
allowing the facility continue operation 8S an agricultural activity.
It should be noted that Mr. Lightfoot is requesting to rezone only part of Tract 12. An existing home Is
located on the east end of the tract. this home is accessed through a private drive along the nonh edge
of the tract. The impact of the zoning change on this house should be considered. (see aerial photo)
It should be noted that the change to C-1 zoning would require some action in terms of a screening fence
or greenbelt buffer between Mr. Lightfoot's propeny and the abutting residential uses.. This is a
requirement in the C-1 zoning district. The owner is contemplating the submission of a preliminary plat
and has discussed this issue with the staff.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request at their April 23, 1992
meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
\)1}-
1
(fV~
, y Manager
. Finance Director
Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I·
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie~æ~
I Secretary Don Bowen
Planning and Zoning Commission
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1806
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984.
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOllOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HillS BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 92-11 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG
Agriculture and C-1 Commercial to C-1 Commercial.
BEING a tract of land out of the S. Richardson Survey, Abstract No. 1266, North Richland Hills,
Tarrant County, Texas, and being further described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron pin for the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Lightfoot Addition, an addition
to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-
93, Page 978, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE South 89 degrees 46 minutes 28 seconds East 280.34 feet;
THENCE South 00 degrees 21 minutes 14 seconds East 327.92 feet;
THENCE South 89 degrees 28 minutes 47 seconds West 514.91 feet to a point in the East R.O.W.
line of Davis Boulevard (State Hwy No. 1938);
THENCE North 00 degrees 25 minutes 55 seconds East along said R.O.W. 194.61 feet;
THENCE South 89 degrees 46 minutes 28 seconds East 230.00 feet;
THENCE North 00 degrees 25 minutes 55 seconds East 140.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING
and containing 3. 16 acres of land, more or less.
This property is located at 7714 Davis Boulevard.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 23rd DAY OF APRIL, 1992.
irman James Brock
Planning and Zoning Commission
I·
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN
REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ 92-09 IS HEREBY
REZONED C-1 THIS 8th DAY OF JUNE, 1992.
Mayor
City of North Richland Hills
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
I·
--
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
tt
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
APRIL 23, 1992
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by
Chairman James Brock at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Chairman
Members
James Brock
David Barfield
Don Bowen
Don Collins
Ron Lueck
Pat Marin
Paul Miller
Barry LeBaron
Steve Pence
Wayne Moody
Dir Community Dev
Building Official
ABSENT
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF APRIL 9, 1992
Ms. Pat Marin made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Don Collins, and the
motion carried 7 -0.
Public Hearing to consider the request of
Rita Jo Hazel to rezone Tract 4PIB, A. G.
Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1630 from its
present zoning classification of R-7-MF
Multi-Family Residential to C-2 Commercial.
This property is located on the east side of
Flory Street, approximately 400 feet south
of Glenview Drive.
Chairman Brock stated the cases heard this
e ning are scheduled to be heard by the
Çit ouncil on June 8, 1992.
Chairman ock opened the Public Hearing
and asked th wishing to speak in favor
of the request t orne forward. There
being none, Chairm Brock asked those
wishing to speak again he request to
come forward. There bein one, Chairman
B rock closed the Public Hearin
Mr. Bowen made the motion to appro PZ
92-10. Mr. Barfield seconded, and the
motion carried 7-
2. PZ 92-11
Public Hearing to consider the request of
Bill Lightfoot to rezone part of Tract 12, s.
I-
--
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes - April 23, 1992
Page 2
Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from its
present zoning classification of Ag
Agriculture to C-1 Commercial. This
property is located at 7714 Davis
Boulevard.
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing
and asked those wishing to speak in favor
of the request to come forward.
Mr. Owen D. Long, 1615 Precinct Line
Road, Hurst, came forward to speak,
representing Mr. Lightfoot. He stated that
the front part of the property is zoned C-l,
but not sure where the line between the C-1
and AG zoning lies.
Chairman Brock asked if the restaurant is
located in the area currently zoned C-l.
Mr. Long stated yes. He stated he didn't
know where the line was, so to avoid
confusion, he asked for all the property to
be rezoned.
Mr. Long presented a drawing showing the
layout of the property, the areas zoned AG
and C-l, and the current placement of
buildings on the property. He stated that
he was working on a preliminary plat for the
whole property, including the areas being
rezoned.
Chairman Brock asked if Mr. Long was
planning for the plat to encompass the
whole property.
Mr. Long stated he would not file a final
plat on the house, only on the property
they were trying to get rezoned. He stated
they were trying to get common zoning to
plat everything on what he'd call "Lot 2,
Block 1, Lightfoot Addition. n
Mr. Barfield asked if the house is part of
the zoning application.
Mr. Long stated no, that he was leaving 140
feet from the back line of the lot to cover
the house. He stated the house is not to be
zoned at this time.
Mr. Barfield asked if the house is owned by
Mr. Lightfoot.
I'
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes - April 23, 1992
Page 3
Mr. Long stated that Mr. Lightfoot and his
wife still own the house.
Mr. Barfield asked if the house will be
platted.
Mr. Long stated that the house will be on
the preliminary plat, but will not be
submitted or recorded as a final plat.
There being no others wishing to speak in
favor, Chairman Brock called for those
wishing to speak against the request to
come forward.
Richard Clough, 8525 Neil Court, came
forward to speak. He stated he was not
necessarily opposed to the zoning change,
but with Mr. Lightfoot's future intentions
with the property. He asked if the change
will allow Mr. Lightfoot to obtain a liquor
permit. He stated he has heard that
outdoor parties with liquor being served
might occur. He stated that residences
around him have drainage problems, water
standing in their back yards, and have had
to put in expensive french drains due to the
stock ponds.
Ms. Marin asked if the restaurant that is
now closed has a liquor license.
Chairman Brock stated no, that the store
has an alcohol permit. He stated that
alcohol permits are controlled by the Texas
Alcoholic Beverage Commission. He stated
that the Planning and Zoning Commission
has no bearing on alcohol permitting. He
stated that they are just looking at zoning
now, but the preliminary plat will show
more detail concerning other issues.
Mr. Randall Turner, 8524 Neil Court, came
forward to speak. He stated he has had to
dig french drains over the last few months.
He stated his concerns o'ver Mr. Lightfoot's
future use of the property. He stated that
on Sunday afternoons, he has heard loud
music coming from the property. He stated
his concern over the additional pond
recently built. He stated he was concerned
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes - April 23, 1992
Page 4
over what Mr. Lightfoot will do with the
property in the future, since he built the
additional pond without talking to the home
owners in the surrounding area.
Edna Millard, residing on Neil Court, came
forward to speak. She stated her concern
about the amount of commercial zoning on
the property. She stated she feels there is
adequate commercial zoning for Mr.
Lightfoot's needs. She stated her concern
about the impact of paving and asphalt on
the current drainage problem. She stated
that she has also installed french drains.
She stated that she and her husband are
opposed to the zoning request.
Chairman Brock asked Mr. Lightfoot to
come forward. Chairman Brock asked Mr.
Lightfoot if he has fencing plans to alleviate
some of the residents fears. He stated some
of these issues will be taken up during
platting, but he asked Mr. Lightfoot to
address the drainage problems also.
Mr. Lightfoot stated that the drainage
problems are with the new pond, and he is
in the process of fixing it. He stated that
the recent rains have prevented him from
getting any machinery in to fix the
problem.
Chairman Brock asked Mr. Lightfoot if he
intends to fix the pond.
Mr. Lightfoot stated yes.
Mr. Lueck asked Mr. Lightfoot how he plans
to fix the pond.
Mr. Lightfoot stated there is some material
to put in the pond that will seal it up.
Mr. Lueck asked if Mr. Lightfoot thought it
was getting into the water table and then
getting out that way.
Mr. Lightfoot stated no, that it was just
groundwater.
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes - April 23, 1992
Page 5
Chairman Brock asked Mr. Lightfoot about
any plans for fencing to alleviate concern
over noise.
Mr. Lightfoot stated he can put up a
stockade fence.
Chairman Brock stated those issues will be
dealt with later, but it may help the
relationship with the neighbors that these
issues are addressed tonight.
Mr. Bowen stated that there is a
requirement for a fence between commercial
and residential zoning.
Mr. Lueck stated that city staff had
comments on requirements if the zoning was
changed to C -1 . He asked if those need to
be covered tonight.
Mr. LeBaron stated that those items will be
addressed during the platting stage.
Mr. Lueck asked if the issue of non-
conforming uses is still valid in this case.
He asked if a pond dries up, can it be
refilled.
Mr. Pence stated that they would need to
get with the City Attorney to discuss those
issues.
Mr. Bowen asked Mr. Lightfoot if he was
aware of the masonry requirement for his
restaurant.
Mr. Lightfoot stated his restaurant would
be all masonry.
There being no one else wishing to speak,
Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Barfield stated that during the studies
on the master plan, it was discussed if strip
commercial was wanted for this area. He
stated they also discussed the ideal depth
for a strip commercial center, and
determined that depths of over 400 feet
create problems with the back portion of the
parcel not being taken care of. He stated
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes - April 23, 1992
Page 6
PZ 92-15
that the Commission should consider that
the property is 514 feet deep.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ
92-11 and made the following comments: He
stated that the rezoning will give the city
more control than it presently has. He
stated that agriculture uses are hard to
control. He stated that city staff will
address these problems during the platting
process. He stated that the strip is deep,
but to gain control, the zoning needs to
apply to all the area.
Mr. Collins stated that the only way to get
citizens concerns addressed is to rezone.
Mr. Barfield stated that the property
should be brought out of the 400 foot
depth. He stated that these comments
should be reviewed and considered at the
time the property comes up for platting.
Ms. Marin seconded the motion, and the
motion carried 7 -0.
Discussion of the minimum square foo
requirements for homes in the R- ngle
Family Residential zoning dist· and
consideration of proceedin ·th amending
the requirements.
Chairman Bro tated that some time has
been spen scussing raising the R-3
square ot requirement from 1400 to 1600
sq e feet. He stated it is the consent of
e Commission to hold a public hearing on
the issue.
Mr. Lueck stated a public hearing is the
best way to get citizens and developers to
speak and get their comments so the
Commission can make a recommendation to
the City Council and get the issue behind
them.
Mr. Bowen stated it seems like the square
foot changes each time a request comes up.
he stated that a minimum needs to be set.
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
FACT SHEET
Case No. PZ 92-11
Hearing Dates: 4/23/92 P&Z
6/08/92 CC
REQUEST: AG and C-1 to C-1
APPLICANT: Bill Lightfoot
PROPERTY OWNER: Bill Lightfoot
LOCATION AND SIZE:
3.16 acres located at 7714 David Boulevard
PROPOSED USE: Continued use as fishing ponds with the addition of a restaurant
on the site.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
The property contains three stock ponds for fishing and an existing building
on the north end of the lot. The property slopes down towards the east and
is built up on this end.
ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE:
North: AG: Existing homes and Northfield Park
South: C-2: vacant land
East: R-2: Meadowview Estates and existing single family residence
West: C-2/0C: vacant structures
DRAINAGE:
This property is not located within any flood plain boundaries as defined by
FEMA.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN:
Davis Boulevard is designated as a Principal Arterial, 6-lane divided.
ZONING HISTORY:
PZ 75-8:
Request to change zoning from Agriculture to Commercial. Site
was included in this request. Request was approved.
l-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ 75-30: Request for Special Use Permit for off-premise beer consumption
on Lightfoot Addition, abutting the property under consideration
on the north and west sides. This request was approved.
PLATTING HISTORY: The property under consideration is unplatted.
.-1 ~
(T)
I- a:
~ t-- CD
C\J
Ie U)
...
~
1 ~
(i N .-1 0 m
.-1 ... ...
...
I CD
~ (I)
... CD
1 f" to Ul
t-
f'. U (I)
... U")
I La ..J m >-
.-1 H <!
UJ ~ cr.
,; t Hi Z C!)
f 09Z l!1 0
...,; .-1 .-1
1 (T')
1 (T)
.-1
1
t --
c::t:U
{\J<t
<t<t \ ~ru
(\J (I~
I~ ";) t
To \ t-lf)
I (!)U
, ru<t
, ~~
1 .. a:~
1
1 . t- r"
~ l
;
I C\J
\ \
I .-1
:'èZ
, ~F: l 86.
1 (8E6~ . W . .=j) 'OAl8\.IA'10 I - - - -
\
I C)
~ ~J .-1
CD '1
~ or;
I <t (\J
~ CD C\J (\J
Ie ~
(T1 (T)
I u
<t
If)l!1
a:~ ~ C\J
~ ~
1 t-OO
~
.-1
1I1 l!1
0
0
I
I
I
I ~
I t\
"
~
I ~
~
~
I ~
~
\i)
'>
~
~
--1
, ,
,---Exlsr. ZOA/¡f' e-/ ~~é'(15r 2'OA/¡f' #6/ ~
-'-
« ~ ~c.1·
~ ~.I.
\ l.1~~1& p.
,¿, , p6·
I I ðl. .Øj?J, 6U
I ~o1' · ~&6 C,I
\JO'" ,~
l,O,J
. 51J'!J-41.' eSl#e
~T(J.oo'
:.'"
~
'Ð "
" "-
~I~
. .1\
Q ,
~
_,J C 1.
, t~'fU' (J. .",. '
t.ú/J ~; o·
¿. &. ,
V r'"
'5,oµt~1r1J ~6
\/0...· SO
f,orJ PO/AJT OF
{jéG/A/AJ/AJG
.5 (j'·4'- '24"£- ZlJO. 34'
~-
'-
"
, ,
~()
~I~
~ I ·
~~
. ~
2
:;¡
,
I~
~
~
I
I
,.,..---PA20Pt::JS4"O zoJv£ c-/ ~
I
~. !to ~ /1 ( ~E S
I
I
I
I
I
I
I __
5lJg- eð' 47"141 - 51". ~/I
CURRENT ZONING Cl AND AG
PROPOSED ZONING Cl
,
\t
.
·8
l~
G1.
ð 1· .
~ CJ ftr'
01,,1 /., .
J:.~,J 4~
',:J f6'
~rAl'\t1~1 C. 1,
~ ..,60
1,0"-
~
~
t--...:
~
c:i
~
~
~"
a ~
~~
~ f" ~
~~~
,~
'J 'a ~
~
~ ~ ~
tQ~~
,·ZOA//AJ6 (?NAN84" R~UEðT éJtNllIlT
V/~/UITY MAP
I
I
t
--l
1f""- I I I I 1]
- I r :~~. I iJ
~ 1 ¡ 'I :t~-lM1H ~
.;¡:i6 I I I l"\ £' J I _
'~~~
i$-~þ I I I ,(\1 L
~~~J^'''C Q ¥OJ__
~ (ì4L ICJ~ ,_
~ f ~~ I I I ~ ~~
~ I.J 'J.S m,~ HJ.~:~
11~-1 ~ ~\.TITlI-=1~~~
-1-J "í ~j ~IÈ- i
r-- 1- ,~ I' ~ ~r-- r-~
--I r~~ I \ '\~ '" j
- - .- IC _
, I cj I -'1.-.1
. => - I I "'¿ ~r~-
Nh~r ~
I en N 7 _~ .
- , <P
'e , - U ....
~~I~ L ~ hl~
. ~ I - I U - i"-F -=' II I
Ú~
~ ~-I 0
C\J N -J LJ !!?
.- '-:-- ~::,- 6
U - 1- .-: ~.. '" ~
/.>.. - ~"'-----' -
,J /--,." _ l' ~~ == =1
.., ~ ~, - ~ r- -JI-~j
~- " )-T 11 I I LL, ~ ~j r 1¡---1tl;ii' __
<.. I '------ "~NJ-W. ~... ~ --..: ~ I
-,;rcr -J.r.- ---r 1 ~ r-- _ _ J , .
. "= ~~/' - I TIT i - u. ...)...) c: , I In- _ J "--
~~ ~ j I / ~ .. - 1_ 1 I" __
" 11 I ~ I 1- - ~ - -~ _ I -L'~ L
.r'l ! : I '~II~ ~I "IT r~"" IT I _ r ~I_ -::::
~TI I I I = I -~1 .IC-
~ , - II 1__1_
- I
1 I
>-
UJ
-J
~
a:1r;l
(\J I Z
..J~~
'---~
"""
~'~
~
C\l1t)
.
I
Ijí- I
II~ ~;-l - I [ 'lJ' III~ J
~ - '~) I ~
I 1_. '?, I' ~
I\. cr .
I " I I I' _
' l--.
~" X j__r -
..~ - en I
I - ,
U~
¿~
I
,
,
~I r-
, ~'1
I
~
I
f/
-1/
--
I
I
I
<:>
~~~
~~ ~
~ 0::
~ I
~I
--
lL.
~
I Ø)
f'-~
I
a::
1
'-y
/
!
~ rt)
I en
~. U =
I
, ,
'.. .
. .
I~·' '''':~'.
..,.. "
h.
\i'¡." .
t·, '.. .'.'
'A:'. 1 ,
; 1(~,:"'1
-:-.. .,.~ '.. I
r-
I
-
-
r
I
II
I
~~:"-'
b:
. ,
,
~
~
I
....}
~
>.>
¿
7
~
~
~
~:..
·'~..Ntf W)~
.., -
. (þ
-
À't
'd" "
~~ .
h ~..
- ---..---
17-
I
. '
.~,~ ..
ú' ~
~~?~ "'\.L
I r ~
~'~': .
,
~
a::
c(
0..
o
..J
LW
~
%
...
a::
o
z
r
, I
-
C)
<t
f'-
~
:.-----
:=r
-..........
4
1'1
---
--~
I~
r
r~~-
'~~-
_r ~t--
t--
, J 1__1
,¡.~~~."
~'
,~ ',"";
#. ~,.' ,.,:<
1-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
dlamm 5- ¿andÛn
INVESTORS
5133 DAVIS BOULEVARD
AC 817 / 281-5026
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76180
April 22, 1992
City of North Richland Hills
Planning and Zoning Commission
RE: PZ 92-11
Alan W. Hamm and J.B. Sandlin own the tract of land adjacent to the south
of Mr. Lightfoot's.
As owner's of the land to the south we have concerns about Mr. Lightfoot's
future plans for this tract. These plans may not be logically addressed
in a Zoning Hearing but more properly addressed in a Platting Process.
Our major concern is the discharge of water from this tract to the south on
our tract. What type (if any) drainage controls does Mr. Lightfoot have in
place for overflow of his fishing ponds.
Should Mr. Lightfoot be required to plat this property perhaps he should be
required to do an in depth engineering study stating specifically what will
happen to discharge of water to the south and the east .
We request that the Commission consider the impact of drainage for any
future development of this property.
Regards,
Rfv1 /7}1 (Atï'(
Ron McGough
General Manager
Hamm & Sandlin
I ~ '
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
r2 tj2;
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
PRESENT ZONING:
C-I
CHANGE TO:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
~EW OWNER: NAME
ADDRESS S I
APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR A LET ER FROM THE OWNER GIVING
PERMISSION TO REQUEST THIS ZONING CHANGE.
PREVIOUS OWNER: NAME
JZ/Æ
~~E
ADDRESS
ENGINEER/gtJKVI?IOR: NAME a/FH fJ. ~ ON(;- J/,tD ~LJr lflHONE
ADDRESS M ç- qc I ~ r1- 1/;, y1 If J.
REASON FOR ZONING 'jl-dlt~r; I XA-5 /l~IIS;-'f
CHANGE ~ D~~{' ~ ~ I~f
DEVELOPER:
NAME
PHONE
~/-ð'.L;2 /
PROPOSED USE
~f:st dv {' él ~ -r-
$300.00
ZONING FEE:
COPIES REQUIRED
33 copies of plat or survey
FILING DEADLINE
15th of each month to be heard following month
t1-li//
Da t'e '
2, Irf ~
,
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Community Development
Department:
SubjectRequest of Conoco, Inc. for a Specific Use Permit on
[ot 1 R, Block B, ana pans of Lots 1 and 2, Block B,
Richland Oaks Addition, for a Car Wash Facility. This
property is located at Bedford-Euless Road and Mesa Verde Trail.
~
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
~perating Budget
I Othe
~
6/8/92
Council Meeting Date:
PZ 92-12
Agenda Number:
Ordinance No. 1807
Conoco, Inc. is the owner of Jetmart, a convenience store with gasoline sales, located at
Highway 121 and Bedford-Euless Road. Conoco intends to construct a new station on the
site and add a car wash facility. Conoco is applying for a Specific Use Permit to allow the
car wash on the site.
This property is currently being replatted with adjacent lots to the east to make the lot
larger. The Texas Department of Transportation's expansion of the Highway 121-Loop 820
interchange will affect this property. The developer is in the process of working with the
TxDOT on the acquisition of right-of-way by the State. The building area on the lot, after
right-of-way dedication, will be considerably smaller, changing from 42,257 square feet to
29,500 square feet. The property under consideration meets all the requirements of the C-
1 zoning district.
This lot has been occupied by convenience stores/gas stations for over twenty years.
Conoco Inc. has owned this property and operated gas stations there since at least 1975.
This type of use is well suited to this particular lot due to ease of access, high traffic
volume, high visibility, and minimum space requirements. The continued use of this site as
a convenience store/gas station would be considered its highest and best use. The
convenience store facility is an allowed use in the C-1 district. However, the operation of a
car wash requires the approval of a Specific Use Permit by the City Council. The Specific
Use Permit is required to allow Conoco to build a car wash adjacent to the convenience
store.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request at their May
14, 1992 meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
-R ~V~
I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1807
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII,
AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9.
1984.
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case Number PZ 92-12 the following described property shall be rezoned from
C-1 Commercial to C-1 Commercial with a Specific Use Permit for a Car Wash Facility.
BEING all of Lot 1-R in Block B of Richland Oaks Addition as recorded in Volume 388-135, Page 7,
of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being portions of Lots 1, 2, and 3 in said Block B
as recorded in Volume 388-7, Page 81 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a 'V' mark in concrete at the intersection of the north right-of-way of Bedford-Euless
Road and the east right-of-way of Mesa Verde Trail;
THENCE North 00 degrees 09 minutes 28 seconds East along the east right-of-way of Mesa Verde
Trail a distance of 80.00 feet to a 'V' mark in concrete found for corner, said corner also being in the
south right-of-way of State Highway No. 121;
THENCE North 60 degrees 27 minutes 00 seconds East, leaving the right-of-way of Mesa Verde Trail
and along the southeastern right-of-way of State Highway No. 121, a distance of 179.80 feet to a
3/4 inch iron rod found for corner;
THENCE South 89 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East, leaving said Highway right-of-way, a
distance of 114.01 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod for corner, in the northeast corner of Lot 2;
THENCE 00 degrees 07 minutes 39 seconds West 185.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod for corner, in
the north right-of-way of Bedford-Euless Road;
THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West along north right-of-way of Bedford-Euless
Road, a distance of 93.10 feet to 'V' mark in concrete found for corner, said corner being the
southeast corner of Lot 1-R;
THENCE North 89 degrees 47 minutes 17 seconds West, continuing along said north right-of-way a
distance of 99.81 feet to a 'V' mark in concrete for corner;
THENCE North 78 degrees 15 minutes 44 seconds West, continuing along said north right-at-way a
distance of 78.90 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0.9740 acres of land, more or
less.
This property is located on Bedtord-Euless Road at Mesa Verde Trail.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14th DAY OF MAY, 1992.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN
REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ 92-14 IS HEREBY
REZONED C-2 COMMERCIAL THIS 8th DAY OF JUNE, 1992.
Mayor Tommy Brown
City of North Richland Hills
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
FACT SHEET
Case No. PZ 92-12
Hearing Dates: 5/14/92 PZ
6/08/92 CC
REQUEST: C-1 to C-1 with a Specific Use Permit
APPLICANT: Conoco, Inc.
PROPERTY OWNER: same
LOCATION AND SIZE:
0.9740 acres situated at Bedford-Euless Road and Highway 121, on the south
side of the freeway.
PROPOSED USE: Convenience Store with gasoline stores and car wash
ALLOWED USES: Convenience Stores (with gasoline pumps). Car Wash/Auto
Laundry allowed with a Specific Use Permit.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Triangular shape. Existing Jetmart (convenience store/gas station) on site.
ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
State Highway 121
North East Mall, City of Hurst
C-1: Abandoned garage; Goodyear
State Highway 121
DRAINAGE:
According to FEMA maps, this property does not lie in the 100- or SOD-year
flood plain.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN:
This site accesses Bedford-Euless Road, an M5U roadway: Minor Arterial, 5
lanes, undivided. The site also accesses the frontage road of westbound
State Highway 121.
I
'--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ 92-12, page 2
ZONING HISTORY:
The first official Zoning Map of the City, dating from 1967, showed this area
to be zoned LR Local Retail. Since then, only one zoning case has been
heard concerning this property or the surrounding properties.
PZ 75-25: Request by Fasgas, a Continental Oil subsidiary, to change from
LR Local Retail to C Commercial with a Specific Use Permit for
off-premise beer consumption. Change was approved.
PLATTING HISTORY:
This property is currently being replatted into one lot (Lot 1 R-1, Block B,
Richland Oaks). This case, PS 92-09, will come before the Commission within
the next few weeks.
PS 84-60: Request for Replat on Lot 5R, Block 1, Carder Addition, just east
of the site under consideration. The site is now occupied by
Gibraltar Savings. The Replat was approved. Gibraltar Savings
had applied for a Short Form plat (PS 83-118), but it was denied.
PS 78-28: Request for Replat on Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Carder Addition,
just east of the site. Replat was approved.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes, page 6
May 14, 1992
2. PZ 91-27
3. PZ 92-12
believes that commercial is the highest and best use for the
property.
Mr. Lueck stated he was surprised that some citizens w ted
the development to face Strummer. He stated that' as
apparent in previous studies that there was no c sensus on
the direction of the area.
Mr. Barfield made the motion to approv Z 92-14 with the
condition that at the time of platting e issues discussed
tonight are addressed at that time. r. Moody seconded the
motion.
Mr. Barfield added that the ommission wants to hear input
from citizens during the ean time. He stated the
Commission was willi to attend meetings with citizens to
help resolve those' ues.
The motion c ied 5-1, with Chairman Brock, Mr. Barfield, Mr.
Lueck, Ms. srin, and Mr. Moody voting for; and Mr. Bowen
voting ainst.
C Irman Brock stated that the City Council will hear this
ase on June 8, 1992. Chairman Brock called a five minute
recess.
The Commission reconvened with the Chairman Brock, Mr.
Bowen, Mr. Lueck, Ms. Marin, and Mr. Moody, present, and
Mr. Barfield absent.
Consideration of Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the City
of North Richland Hills.
Mr. Lueck made to motion to approve PZ 91-27 and
recommend the Plan to the City Council. Ms. Marin seconded
the motion, and the motion carried 5-0.
Public Hearing to consider the request of Conoco, Inc., to
rezone Lot 1R, Block B, and parts of Lots 1 and 2, Block B,
Richland Oaks Addition, from its present zoning classification
of C-1 Commercial to a proposed classification of C-1
Commercial with a Special Use Permit.
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for
those wishing to speak to come forward.
Mr. Joe Malazo, Conoco, Inc., came forward to speak. He
stated that the Texas Highway Department was taking part of
his lot to widen the road, and that Conoco will be building a
new convenience store/gas station on the lot and would like
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes, page 7
May 14, 1992
4. PS 92-10
5. PZ 92-13
to build a car wash in addition. He stated Conoco has been
there for about 20 years.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Brock
closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 92-12 as
presented. Mr. Moody seconded the motion, and the motion
carried 5-0.
Mr. LeBaron stated that Canoco has also applied for a replat,
but they couldn't get the details worked out with the highway
department in time for tonight's agenda, but it will be heard
at the next meeting.
Request of NRH Joint Venture for Replat of Lot 1, Block 5
Richland Oaks Addition, Phase One, Fourth Filing. This
property is located on State Highway 121 at Mesa de
Trai I.
Mr. LeBaron stated that all staff and en .
had been addressed, and that the pi
approval.
Ms. Marin made the motion approve PS 92-1 0 as
presented. Mr. Bowen s onded the motion, and the motion
carried 5-0.
Public Hearing consider the request of NRH Joint Venture
to rezone p of Lot 1, Block 5, Richland Oaks Addition,
Phase 0 ,Fourth Filing, from its present zoning
classi · ation of C-1 Commercial to a proposed classification
of 2 Commercial.
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for
those wishing to speak to come forward.
Chairman Brock stated that there are two zoning districts on
this parcel, and that the applicant was trying to make it all
one district.
Duncan Fulton, of Good, Fulton and Farrell Architects, came
forward to speak. He stated the City suggested, as an
administrative matter, to rezone the property to one district
to get consistent zoning with the surrounding properties.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairman Brock
closed the Public Hearing.
w
¡,
'H
11'
I
~
I
I
-
I
8
5
9
10
4
I . 11
!
3
::)
12 0
0
¿':-0
~
'J
2~;; f::
~~
~ '
\
)-.
1~-9
^(
00
V
85~ 130 133
¡.,. 1A II": 1A
1M CÐ
133
I 2 0 0 2 3A
ŒI CI 0
TRACT 1A ~ ŒI
13."
51" ~A~~ 4R
I 3 3 5R
6R
NOR1,"",~A (#J 4 4
.
.
5
5
0 a .
N uo a
0 6 <\I 6
aD .....
Ie
I
I
pz ~2- 12
103
2.6
269
o ;;)
o N
- .
-1
H"
<t
IT:
t-
·w
o
IT:
W
>
<{
en
w
¿
10
~' -
8 ¿~
OER
-t" 5 CAR
, P:V E Y
5LJ 30 B
A~
8
248
7
4
1'" .j
F
....
\
\
t-
TR . 3E 0
.91 Ac ~
~
U
<{
-1
CD
169
N
w
E
s
~
~<:5
~~
~
,
: I
...'
rr
IT:
o
218 ~
~
~
I;
I
I
Ie I
¡
2
2
~ I
22¿
.¡j
W \C
W
a:
H
en
W
o
I
I
I:
<:
I
I
ler
HL
:x:
,n
5R
NORTH
9t'
é>~
, -
1°
~~
I ·
I
I
I
I
,I
--
,I
i
:1
I
JI
-4
il
I
I
J
~
1t3
I-
-~
li'i
I
\
n
I
(
... ....
OJ
o
en
o
I
::u
I
-
-0
-.J I
~N
-u
c
en
c:
~
~
~
~
:IE · -~
:E:~
r-.i~
~..~.
.~
.
--
-' ~-----
~
-1 L~,
, r
¡
,
y--
.. - J
I I -4 ."- ~. I
f----, r- . ., ~ ¡'
..~~~J ~ ;:
¡ ~ :
~ ~ f --<
---- -----. ~..
- ._.--~ -- --
P2- ~2 - J2-
i I,.
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
~
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
PRESENt ZONING:
C-l Catmercial
CHANGE TO: C-l earrnercial with Specific Use
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached
NEW OWNER:
NAHE
N/A
PHONE
ADDRESS
APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR A LEtTER FROM THE OWND,-
GIVING HIM PE1tMISSION TO REQUEST THIS ZONING CHANGE.
PREVIOUS OWNER: NAME conoco Inc.
ADDRESS 600 N. Diary Ashford
PHONE
DEVELOPER:
PRONE VV';;¡!
/W
ENGINEEIt/_ NAME GallCMaY, Pane.ro & Assoc. PHONE 303-745-7448
NAME
Same as above
ADDRESS
ADDRESS 14202 E. Ev-ans Avenue, Aurora, (X) 80014
1
REASON FOR ZONING
CHANGE
Raievelopnent of site to include n(!M car wash
J 111 ....
PROPOSED USE
COnvenience store with gasoline sales and car ~sh
ZONING FEE:
$300.00
COPIES REQUIRED
FILING DUDLINE
32 eop1es of plat or survey
15th of each month to b. heard following manch
7-
--
~/./ ,~/J '
~;; ot ¡pp ~ ~t or A¡;;C'
Y/7/7'Z
Date /
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Community Development
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Sufficient Funds Available
_operating Budget _
Other B ~ ;/) "/ II -../J
W- f¡/ I I r f /A_-,j
. D~ ead Si;~;t~ I ,~ ~it; tf~;ger ..
I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
6/8/92
Council Meeting Date:
Public Hear~ng for ~onsideration of an amendment A en a Number; PZ 92-15
to the Zomng Ordinance #1080 regarding minimum squJe ?oot requirements Of
dwelling units in the R-3 Single Family Residential zoning district.
Ordinance No. 1800
At the April 23, 1992 workshop meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, there
was general discussion among the members concerning the minimum square footage
requirement in the R-3 zoning district. The Commission felt that the existing 1,400
square foot minimum requirement was too low for the type of housing market currently
, being developed in the City. After their discussion, they directed the staff to prepare
a proposed ordinance and schedule a public hearing for the May 14th P & Z meeting
to consider an increase of the minimum square footage from 1,400 SF to 1,600 SF. The
Planning and Zoning Commission held the public hearing on May 14, 1992 and voted
to recommend the attached ordinance for submittal to the City Council. No one spoke
in opposition to the proposed change.
It is interesting to note that a Texas Supreme Court case in 1948, Thompson v. City of
Carrollton, upheld a zoning ordinance which contained minimum size restrictions on
houses in residential districts. In many of the past R-3 zoning requests considered in
North Richland Hills, stipulations have been attached to the ordinance requiring a
certain number of square feet for houses built in the area covered by that particular
zoning district change. Raising the minimum square foot requirements is the best
solution to the myriad of problems that could arise through the present practice. Since
this is an amendment to the regulations contained in the R-3 zoning district, any
proposed change will impact any new applications for building permits for new
residential construction.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required public hearing and consider
the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
" Finance Director
Page 1 of 1
I
IIÞ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1809
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING
ORDINANCE 1080, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO AMEND
REGULATIONS REGARDING THE MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZE IN THE R-3
ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills has
forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1080, the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, by changing the said ordinance as set forth herein.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
1 .
THAT, Section 24.2 be hereby amended to read as follows:
24.2 MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZE
Every dwelling unit hereafter erected, reconstructed or altered in R-1, R-2, or R-3 residential districts
shall have a minimum floor area as follows: R-1 and R-1-S 2,000 square feet, R-2 1,800 square feet,
R-3 1,600 square feet, and AG 1,400 square feet exclusive of breezeways, basements, open and
closed porches, common corridors, parking areas, garages and accessory buildings. The ground
floor of the residence shall be at least 2/3 of the required size.
2.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the
section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any
phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or
unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences,
paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City
Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase,
clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
3.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance 1080, The Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this
ordinance.
4.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage.
I'
lit·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14th DAY OF MAY, 1992.
PLANNING A
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 8th DAY OF JUNE, 1992.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY
I-
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
PZ Minutes, page 8
May 14, 1992
~r. Moody ~~de ~ ~~~~-;-;;;;/~~iilij¡¡~
_____-.eAgifleering-cóffiinents. The motion was seconded by Mr.
._________- Lueck, and the motion carried 5-0.
6. PZ 92-15 Public Hearing for consideration of an amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance # 1 080 regarding minimum square foot
requirements of dwelling units in the R-3 Single Family
Residential zoning district.
Chairman Brock stated that the issue of raising the minimum
square foot requirement from 1 400 to 1600 square feet was
discussed at the April 23 meeting, and the Commission
directed the Staff to prepare an ordinance for consideration.
Mr. Lueck asked what the implementation process would be.
Mr. LeBaron stated that there was a concern over the legality
of establishing minimum square foot requirements, and that
Mr. Husband did some research and found several court
cases that allowed such regulations. Mr. LeBaron stated that
if the Council approves the ordinance, effective that date, this
ordinance would be the yardstick that building permit
applications would be measured by.
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and invited those
wishing to speak to come forward. There being none,
Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve PZ 92-15 as
presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Marin. and the
motion carried 5-0.
...J.,,~~.....~.....-................. nru-.~~ ~""--_'$oO-.."'''''''''''''_____~ '
7. PZ92-16
Public Hearing for consideration of an amendment to the..~
Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding the masonry requirement
on existing structures and permanent type accessory
buildings.
Chairman Brock stated that direction was given to Staff to
exempt existing structurss'from the masonry requirement,
and that ordinance;.-is presented tonight.
Mr. Lueck stated that during the pre-session, he questioned
Staff on the intent on commercial buildings. He stated that it
was not intended for commercial buildings to be a part of this
ordinance when Staff was directed to pursue this issue. Mr.
Lueck stated that the commercial issue should be considered
at another time, and should leave that section out of the
proposed amendment, section being 24.2.2.
...___..-_-",-,-__0r7JO:".t::,~"'':,'"''''''''''~;''''J9'''':''''''"''rt'',,,,,,,,-~''''"C'T:'.''''''' ..,.,~..~';t'~:.. .:.'i" .,-,"'-:' ,~, " I
~
II
Department: _ Council Meeting Date:
Public Hearing for consideration of an amendment to A PZ 92-16
Subject: the Zomng Ordinance #1080 regarding the masonry genda Number:
requiremen.t on existing residential structures.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Community Development
6/8/92
During the workshop meeting held on April 23, 1992, the Planning and Zoning
Commission expressed a concern regarding the manner in which the strict enforcement
of the masonry requirement is being applied to existing homes with wood siding. There
are a number of existing homes located in the older portions of the city constructed with
wood siding that were built prior to the adoption of the current masonry regulation. Most
of these homes are located in the southern portion of the City south of Glenview Drive
or in the Smithfield area of the City.
Strict enforcement of the masonry requirement often places an undue hardship on
homeowners attempting to perform minor renovation or remodeling of their homes. In
the past, some homeowners have sought variances from the masonry requirement from
the Zoning Board of Adjustment. However, this places additional costs and time delays
on simple remodeling projects.
I
I
,
,
,
~
~~ource of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
~ Other,
I
The attached proposed ordinance will amend the masonry regulations and exempt
existing homes from having to brick the entire structure when applying for a remodeling
building permit. However, if the structure contains some brick, such as having brick up
to the bottom of the windows, then any addition must match the existing brick material.
Your attention is directed to paragraph liB" on the attached ordinance. Paragraphs II All
and IICH contain no changes from the current language in the Zoning Ordinance. The
Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing on a proposed
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance at their meeting on May 14, 1992. The proposed
ordinance has been recommended for approval by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required public hearing and consider
the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Ie f1 ~~ Finance Director
I City Man~
nt Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
1
ORDINANCE NO.
1810
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING
ORDINANCE 1080, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE,
REGARDING THE MASONRY REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL
STRUCTURES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planninq and zoninq Commission of the city of North
Richland Hills has forwarded a recommendation to the city Council for
amendment of Ordinance No. 1080, the Comprehensive zoninq ordinance,
by chanqinq the said ordinance as set forth herein.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, section 24.2.1 be hereby amended to read as follows:
24.2.1 CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS REQUIRED TO HAVE PERCENTAGE OF
BRICK OR MASONRY
A. All multifamily, quadruplex, duplex, and single family
residential dwellings and all permanent structures (as defined in
section 24.7) on a residential lot shall have exterior walls
consisting of at least seventy-five percent brick, stone, or if
approved by the city Council, other masonry or materials of equal
characteristics.
For the purposes of this requirement the exterior wall shall be
defined as that exposed portion of the building from the
foundation up to the ceiling line of the first floor of the
building.
B. An exemption to the masonry requirement shall apply to existing
residential structures, including all permanent structures, which
do not meet the masonry requirement. Any enlargement of an
existing residential structure, includlng all permanent
structures, shall provide an amount of masonry which matches the
adjacent surfaces of the existing structure.
C. Masonry tilt wall residential homes shall be allowed only in
Single Family Residential Planned-Development Districts. Planned
Development Districts construction of tllt wall residences shall
be considered only in areas where at least ten contiguous lots
are so zoned. For the purposes of this section, any public
street, alley or thoroughfare shall not prevent the lots from
being considered contiguous. The application for Planned
Development, provided by this section, shall include a specific
plan for each structure including its position on the lot and the
size of each proposed structure. No structure less than 1, 400
square feet shall be considered. The application shall be
processed as all other zoning or rezoning applications. In
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
2
processin~ building permits and inspections in the above PD zone,
the Buildlng Official shall require soil tests showing that soil
conditions are suitable for thlS type of tilt wall construction.
The suitability, after soil testlng, shall be certified by a
Registered Professional Engineer as to each lot. The Building
Official shall require concrete tests be made for each house
using three cylinders for each 25 yards of concrete. Before the
final inspection, a statement from a Registered Professional
Engineer shall be submitted to the City stating that the
structure has been constructed in accordance with the plans and
s~ecifications. The exterior of the home shall have a stucco
flnish and the roof shall be concrete tile or roof with similar
weight. The entire exterior surface of the home shall be sealed
with a silicone water proof sealer or synthetic equal to the
silicone, and applied per the manufactured recommendations.
2.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention
of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses
and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase,
clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be
declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases,
clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since
the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or
unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
3.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance 1080, The Zoning Ordinance of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force
and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance.
4.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS
1992.
DAY OF
COMMISSION
~Il~
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tþ
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS
1992.
DAY OF
3
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
fÞ
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
PZ Minutes, page 8
May 14, 1992
6. PZ 92-15
7. PZ 92-16
Mr. Moody made the motion to approve PZ 92-13 subject to
engineering comments. The motion was seconded by Mr
Lueck, and the motion carried 5-0.
I"
Public Hearing for consideration of an amendm¢to the
Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding minimunySquare foot
requirements of dwelling units in the R-3 ~gle Family
Residential zoning district. .....~/",
"'c
Chairman Brock stated that the i~~e of raising the minimum
square foot requirement from K400 to 1600 square feet was
discussed at the April 23 ~~ting, and the Commission
directed the Staff to pr~.påre an ordinance for consideration.
J~)'.
Mr. Lueck asked wt)át the implementation process would be.
.1
,,/
Mr. LeBaron s~ed that there was a concern over the legality
of establish~ minimum square foot requirements, and that
Mr. Husba,rrd did some research and found several court
cases tt:Jd't allowed such regulations. Mr. LeBaron stated that
if the..éouncil approves the ordinance, effective that date, this
orctJ(Íance would be the yardstick that building permit
~plications would be measured by.
Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and invited those
wishing to speak to come forward. There being none,
Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing.
;:
l
./-
Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve PZ 92-15 as
presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Marin, and the
motion carried 5-0.
.....-~-.. ....--..--......
Public Hearing for consideration of an amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance # 1080 regarding the masonry requirement
on existing structures and permanent type accessory
buildings.
Chairman Brock stated that direction was given to Staff to
exempt existing structures from the masonry requirement,
and that ordinance is presented tonight.
Mr. Lueck stated that during the pre-session, he questioned
Staff on the intent on commercial buildings. He stated that it
was not intended for commercial buildings to be a part of this
ordinance when Staff was directed to pursue this issue. Mr.
Lueck stated that the commercial issue should be considered
at another time, and should leave that section out of the
proposed amendment, section being 24.2.2.
I' '
-.
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ Minutes, page 9
May 14, 1992
Mr. Lueck made to motion to approve PZ 92-16, striking the
verbiage concerning commercial buildings. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Bowen, and the motion carried 5-0.
STAFF REPORT
None
,7
CITIZEN COMMENTS
....
Mr. William Bell, 6733 Meadow Road, came forward tc.t"speak.
He stated his concern over taking Meadow Road and turning
it into Holiday Lane.
Mr. LeBaron stated that this concerns the Master Plan. He
stated that the City Manager asked Staff to contact property
owners that would be affected by the changes on Douglas
Lane and Holiday Lane, and to try and!'-schedule a meeting
over the next few weeks. He state<!~the goal was to try and
get a consensus of the property owners on their feelings
toward the alignment of Holiday-Lane so the City Council can
tailor the alignment is desired,: Mr. LeBaron invited Mr. Bell
to attend that meeting, and stated he would be contacted.
Ms. Kathleen Bell, 6733 Meadow Road, came forward to
speak. She stated she would like to see more parks in the
city, since the City is trying to provide a good place to live.
She requested that when the Commission considers
development.. they should consider parks within that
development.
Chairman Brock stated that the Parks department plan has
that recommendation in it.
Mr. Lueck stated that parks provided by development is also
part of that plan.
Chairman Brock stated that the Commission agrees with the
Parks plan.
Fred Finky, 8330 Jerrie Jo, came forward to speak. He stated
he missed the hearing on PZ 92-14 and hoped there was
consideration of downstream flooding.
Chairman Brock stated that the only thing considered was
zoning, and that when the plat is filed, the engineers will look
at that issue. He stated the public will have an opportunity to
come back at that time to talk about those issues some more.
ADdOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
~. '. . ... - .. --.
L
.~_,~""""''i~'"ft.iII,~,..-w(~ø-:''1f.~~''\''\''¡'~'!. ."\"..-..... ....... -.
·"'j"'.'--'~"'··"'\"-':-..r""~~
Department:
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Community Development
Council Meeting Date:
Subject:
Request of Gary Starnes for Final Plat of
Lots , and 2, BlOCk 2, orange valley AdditiOn
Section 2. This property is located on the
east side of Douglas Lane, north of Starnes Road.
Agenda Number:
6/8/92
PS 92-07
Gary Starnes has submitted a Final Plat for Block 2, Lots 1 & 2, Orange Valley Addition -
Section II. This property is located on the east side of Douglas Lane, north of Starnes~ This
plat was disapproved by the City Council at the April 27, 1992 meeting because a required
drainage flume was not constructed in Section I, Orange Valley Addition. The developer has
agreed to construct this flume no later than July 1, 1992.
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and approved this Final Plat at its April 9.
1992 meeting, subject to all engineering comments.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Acct. Numbe"r
Sufficient Funds Available
fill
,'< 1~
r City M nager
" Finance Director
I
Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
fÞ
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
'<
Q
~
" ~
0) "
~ß
~(:)
~ ~,
'~~
~ ~ ~
< ~ .........
C\¡ IYì
~ ~
"J! 't ~~
0 ~
~I .
~ T)
~, \) í)
" ~
~! C)
~
0' ~
Q!
,p.
0"
ot
?c~~
!JO~
p¿1t.~ 1.I4
vJ o4,r pú·
oø.~ ~5Z. ~ &
6f4,J 1-" f
.Jðl,.· 1.0";'-
~
A.lS9· .54'41JII#£ - ZOS. 95'
----- £OQ~' -_ 7~ ~"~~M2ï
I
I
: PO/A/T OF
: It) ߣGIUAJIÄlG
A 7.~'ÜË.~
'J r--"'"\ \ \"--
iY) \ , \\
~ I \~'
~ I \
I 15'Oil/£
I \
I
I
I
I I
I I
, " , I
;~~
ì~~'1
I~
1-
!~ I
I
LOT I
2 v.v€ -? Z.
IV 89 cr 55' It!/'E - 200,83'
~/
&~
/ BL.O
/4
~i
~
-J I
~
~,
~I
LOT 2
~
~~
t\J . I
1)')0
10
/5
\ dß { ¿;, t;*
¡¿:, 'J ~ Ii' :/
BL-OC ,.;6 £, 6¡"O~
O¡2~ ~, ,..' ~
r'fJ8' ..
v -
---
'.(II
~i
~ --'/\ /,¡t-
~ ~..:
---
I
I
I
~I
~
, J
i ~
I
I
10;
---
~
I
I I
~ I
---------19~,87'--757"ÜTÚ:ESMTJ I
- - - .M~~·~~'Jº·'W ---ZJ:)-B~' ~- ,.v 7cJQ 6~ 6S- 80l.
r 75' LI é J- - --- -...., \ E ¿'J('O .. .v-B
, I \ \ \
\ /SÐ~U£.~\
1,,1 \ ì ---
I I I \
I I~ I 20 \ /9 I I
f I \ I I I
\ I I I
/7
/8
() /0 ZÐ M 4Þ 60 75 100
¡.....:u U---J I I
SCA£~ IA.J FEET
SCAi..6: /:50'
/50
I
VICIAJITY MAP
I
,-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to deny PS 92-07.
I Motion carried 6-1; Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, Councilwomen Spurlock and Johnson, Councilmen Garvin,
Scoma, and Wood voting for and Councilman Welch voting against.
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
April 2", 1992
Page 5
10.
PS 91-31- REQUEST OF STEEPLE RIDGE VENTURE AND
WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FO NAL PLAT OF LOTS 41-49,
BLOCK 1; LOTS 67-73, BL 2; LOTS 3-11, BLOCK 3;
LOTS 3-20, BWC , TEEPLE RIDGE ADDITION,
PHASE II (LOCATED ST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND NORTH
OF SHADY GROVE ROAD)
APPROVED
moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, to approve PS 91-31.
11.
PS 92-07 - REQUEST OF GARY STARNES FOR FINAL PLAT OF
LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 2, ORANGE VALLEY ADDITION,
SECTION 2 (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DOUGLAS LANE,
NORTH OF STARNES ROAD)
DENIED
*12.
GN 92-46 - RATIFYING THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHIEF OF
POLICE ON STEP PROJECT AGREEMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 92-20
APPROVED
*13.
GN 92-47 - APPROVE AGREEMENT WITH XAS DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (TDOT) CONCERNING INTERCHANGE SAFElY LIGHTING -
RESO N NO. 92-19
APPROVED
*14.
GN 92-48 - PROPERlY TAX REFUND
APPROVED
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
P/z Minutes - Page
April 9, 1992
make a recommendation
Council.
Mr. LeBaron stated to tho
have tried to find copie of the
plan at the library an city hall,
staff will double th ·r efforts to
make sure everyone ows where the
documents are so eryone will have
access to them.
2. PS 91-31
Consider Fin Plat Steeple Ridge,
Phase II. is property is located
west of D is Boulevard and north
of Shady rove Road.
Dick erkins, of Teague, NaIl, and
Per ns, came forward to speak. He
s ted that they have agreed to all
gineering comments.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to
approve PS 91-31 subject to all
staff and engineering comments.
Mr. Leuck seconded, and the motion
carried 5-0.
3. PS 92-07
Consider Final Plat of Orange
Valley Addition Block 2.
Mr. LeBaron stated that the owner's
representative should have been
here. He stated that the two lot
subdivision was on Douglas Lane and
that there was a house on one of
the lots. He stated that the
engineer has responded and agreed
to all comments and that the staff
recommends approval subject to
engineering and staff comments.
Mr. Leuck made the motion to
approve PS 92-07 subject to all
engineering comments. Ms. Marin
seconded the motion, and the motion
carried 5-0.
4. PZ 91-25
Consider amendment
Ordinance #1080 re
Zoning Dist
_6"_.__..___......
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Owen D. Long and Associates, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
March 23, 1992
Mrs. Wanda Calvert
Planning and Zoning Coordinator
Pl anni ng and Zoni¡ng Commi ssi on
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: PS92-07 Orange Valley Addition
Section 11, Block 2, Lots 1 & 2
Final Plat and Construction Plans
Dear Wanda:
We have received a copy of Kevin B. Miller1s letter dated March 20, 1992
and have the following comments:
1. The signature is that of the current owner of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2.
2. Although the setback lines for Lot 2 are not required to be on the
Final Plat, we are showing side and rear setback lines.
3. The Owner has agreed to sign a covenant for the Douglas Lane improvements
adjacent to Lots 1 and 2, Block 2.
4. The Owner has agreed to sign a covenant for the sidewalk adjacent to
Lots 1 and 2, Block 2.
5. The location of an additional street light, if required, will be co-
ordinated with the Public Works Department and T.U. Electric. The
Owner is aware that the cost, if any, for installation of the additional
street light will be paid by the developer directly to T.U. Electric.
6. The Owner has agreed to sign a covenant for tœfuture sewer extension
to serve Lot 20 The Owner is aware of the 4% City inspection fee for
utility improvements. The Owner will be made aware that the 411 sewer
service to serve the existing home on Lot 2 is temporary because it
will be laid offsite in a City easement and that when the sewer in
Douglas is extended to the north, the service is to be relocated to the
line in Douglas Laneo All other minor comments and revisions on the
construction plans will be made as requestedo
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 I Hurst, Texas 76054 I Phone (817) 281-8121
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Page 2 - March 23, 1992
7. The requested reV1Slon will be made and the marked-up set of blue
line drawings will be returned with the next submittal.
All other comments do not require an answer or added comments.
If there are any additional comments or requirements, please give me a call.
aincereb.
~. long, P.
ODL/ml
cc: Gary B~ Starnes
7500 Douglas Lane NRH 76180
cc: Marvin Smith
7701 Brandi Place NRH 76118
IE.
/
I'
'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
City of
orth Richland Hills
March 20, 1992
Ref: PWM 92-029
Memo To:
Planning and Zoning Commission
From:
Kevin B. Miller, P.E.
Assistant Director of Utilities
Subject:
PS92-07; ORANGE VALLEY ADDITION - SECTION II,
Block 2, Lots 1 & 2;
Final Plat and Construction Plans
I have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on February 28 and offer
the following comments.
1 · The signatures are dated November 1 991. Are these names and signatures of the
current owners of Lots 1 and 2?
2. Building Setback Lines need to be added for Lot 2.
3. This plat fronts on Douglas Lane. Douglas Lane should ultimately be improved to
provide a 40 foot roadway. The Subdivision Ordinance requires that the Developer
provide his portion of these improvements. These improvements are required by
Ordinance and bu are not necessary for the proposed Subdivision. The Commission
previously suggested a covenant for future street improvements. Public Works is
not opposed to accepting a covenant at this time.
4. The Zoning Ordinance requires that sidewalks be constructed along all newly
platted Lots. The street reconstruction will be delayed pending further
development. Public Works is therefore not opposed to accepting a covenant for
the sidewalk as well.
5. Street Lighting is required by section 1-06 of the Design Manual. An additional
street light will be required based on current ordinances. The location should be
coordinated with Public Works and TU Electric. The cost for installation of the
additional street light will be paid by the developer directly to TU Electric.
(817) 581-5500 · P.o. BOX 820609 · NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76182
I- ·
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PWM 92-029
Page 2
March 20, 1992
6. There are a few minor comments on the construction plan for the proposed sewer
line. Inspection fees will be due prior to starting construction. The current rate is
four percent. The future sewer extension in Douglas may be delayed until Lot 2 is
further subdivided or the street is reconstructed. A covenant for the future
extension needs to be included with the previously mentioned Street and Sidewalk
Covenant. The existing home on Lot 2 will temporarily be served from the north.
This is only temporary since the sevice line will be laid offsite in a City Easement.
When the sewer in Douglas is extended to the north, the service needs to be
relocated to Douglas Lane.
7 · There are some minor comments regarding the engineering and construction plans.
These comments are recorded on a set of blueline construction plans. The plans
have been returned to the Engineer for revision. The comments contained herein do
not purport to relinquish the design engineer of his responsibility to provide
adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans. The City's eventual approval
of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of
North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. The marked-up blue
lines should be returned with the next submittal.
~ C LÌ ),--T) LLL l
Ke in B. Miller, P.E.~Y'---'
Assistant Director of Utilities
cc: Greg W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works/Utilities
Barry LeBaron, Director of Community Development
I
..
I
.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Police
Council Meeting Date: 06-08-92
Agenda Number: GN 92-69
ubject:
Automated FingerDrint Identification System -
Resolution 92-31
The Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) is a crime fighting tool
that allows police to process, in a matter of minutes instead of days, both latent
prints (taken from crime scenes) as well as ten finger prints taken at book-in.
This processing consist of computer storage and matching of known fingerprint
specimens with unknown fingerprint specimens for positive identification.
The City of Dallas implemented an AFIS program in 1990 which has met with great
success. The State of Texas has awarded a contract for an AFIS system and is
presently in the early impl ementat i on stages. Tarrant County 1 aw enforcement
agencies, in conjunction with the Citizens Crime Commission of Tarrant County, have
been worki ng on securi ng an AFIS system for the county. After revi ewi ng vari ous
options, it was decided that the best course of action was to join with the City of
Dallas, which will permit access to their data base as well as the State's. Both
systems are supplied by NEC Technologies, Inc.
Tarrant County Commissioners Court has pledged $1.75 million to partially fund
implementation of a Tarrant County AFIS system. North Richland Hills was asked to
be the host City for a northeast Tarrant County terminal and to coordinate the
cost-shari ng efforts among the northeast Tarrant County ci ties. To that end,
Police representatives requested that other northeast Tarrant County cities approve
a resolution committing to financial support of the project. These resolutions are
null and void if the City of North Richland Hills does not elect to participate in
the project. This resolution will formalize this city's support of the project and
bind the other northeast Tarrant cities, who have passed resolutions, to their
share of financial support.
Funding Source: It is anticipated that the City's cost to implement this system
will be approximately $65,000. This amount has been included on a capital needs
list for fiscal year 1992/93. It is proposed to be funded over a period of 10
years at a projected cost of approximately $8,700 annually.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the attached resolution, authorizing participation in a
county-wide AFIS system, be approved by the City Council and that staff be
authorized to include the proposed funding in the 1992/93 budget.
Finance Review
-
I Finance Director
apartment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
D""rt'" ... ""'~
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
t '
RESOLUTION NO. 92-31
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
WHEREAS, The Tarrant County Commissioners Court has approved the
acquisition of equipment for installation of a new Automated
Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS); and
WHEREAS, The City of North Richland Hills City Council is requested to
authori ze the Ci ty Manager to execute a contract wi th Tarrant
County and the City of Dallas under the inter-local
jurisdictional agreement provisions of State law; and
WHEREAS, The City of North Richland Hills City Council is requested to
authori ze the City Purchas i ng Agent to execute a cont ract wi th
NEC Technologies Inc. for the acquisition of a terminal and
related devices which are a part of this Automated Fingerprint
Identification System; and
WHEREAS, The City of North Richland Hills Police Department, acting as the
host City for the northeast Tarrant County AFIS terminal site,
has requested simi 1 ar RESOLUTIONS from other northeast Tarrant
County participating cities; and
WHEREAS, The RESOLUTIONS, to participate and share funding, of the other
northeast Tarrant County cities is null and void if the City of
North Richland Hills City Council fails to pass a RESOLUTION in
support of the AFIS terminal site;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS CITY COUNCIL:
That it hereby declares that the policy of the City of North Richland
Hills is to authorize the City Manager and City Purchasing Agent to proceed
with purchase and implementation of an inter-agency Automated Fingerprint
Identification System terminal at the police facility by means of a
contract wi th Tarrant County and the City of Da 11 as for access to thei r
data bases and with NEC Technologies Inc. for purchase of terminal
equipment. It is further declared to be the policy of the City of North
Richland Hills that it will cooperate and coordinate with other
participating northeast Tarrant County cities to facilitate inter-agency
fingerprint identifications between participating entities, including
Tarrant County, for effi ci ent and economi ca 1 ut i 1 i zat i on of the
inter-agency identification capabilities of the new Automated Fingerprint
Identification System. It is understood and agreed that the total costs
for purchase and impl ementat i on of the northeast Tarrant County termi na 1
and related infrastructure costs will be shared, based on population, on a
pro-rated basis depending on the actual number of participating Cities.
I
'II
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1992.
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
for
Rex
McEntire,
Attorney
the
City
II
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
l-
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Management Information Services Department
Council Meeting Date: 06-08-92
Subject:
Municipal Communications Upgrade - Resolution 92-30 Agenda Number: GN 92-70
Approval of the attached resolution is required if the City of North Richland Hills
is to participate in a county-wide trunked radio system presently being designed
and installed by the City of Fort Worth. This project was described in IR 92-35,
and was the subject of a workshop held March 31st.
The proposed system is designed to support all of the City of Fort Worth's
communications needs as well as public safety communications for other Tarrant
County entities. By converting North Richland Hills public safety departments to
this system, the City would see immediate benefits in public safety communications.
These i nc 1 ude: direct commun i cat ions between departments duri ng emergency
situations, secure voice communications for narcotics and other privacy sensitive
functions, immediate multijurisdictional communications and expansion capabilities
to accommodate anticipated City growth.
The conversion of public safety communications to this system also provides several
radio frequencies, and radio equipment on those frequencies, to be converted to use
by other City departments to allow for orderly growth of non public safety
communications within the City. Non public safety departments presently have only
one frequency which will not be sufficient for communications in the future.
The attached resolution must be approved by July 1, 1992, in order for the City of
Fort Worth to determi ne the actual per ent i ty cost. Fundi ng requi red wi 11 not
exceed the amount indicated below and will be reduced based on the actual number of
participating entities.
Funding Source: It is anticipated that the City's initial cost will be
approximately $550,000 and each subsequent year is estimated at $75,000. The
$550,000 has been included on a capital needs list for fiscal year 1992/93. It is
proposed to be funded over a peri ad of 10 years at a projected cost of $67,000
annually. It is also proposed that each subsequent year be included in that year's
proposed budget.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the attached resolution, authorizing participation in a
county-wide communications system, be approved by the City Council and that staff
be authorized to include the proposed funding in the 1992/93 budget.
Finance Review
, Finance Director
-
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
D~,.,o 1 "'~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
RESOLUTION NO. 92-30
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth sought bids for the acquisition of
equipment for installation of a new 800 megahertz communications
system; and
WHEREAS, the Fort Worth City Council adopted M&C C-13137 authorizing the
City Manager to execute a contract with Motorola, Inc., with said
contract being executed on November 19, 1991, for the acquisition
of this communications system; and
WHEREAS, the Fort Worth City Council adopted M&C G-9384 and Ordinance No.
10950 providing for the sale of Combination Tax and Revenue
Certificates of Obligation for the purchase of this
communications system; and
WHEREAS, the new communications system will have the capability of
providing for improved inter-agency communications between the
City of North Richland Hills Fire and Police departments and
other agencies, including the City of Fort Worth; and
WHEREAS, equipment pricing has been guaranteed by Motorola, Inc., to be
the same for other participating entities as was bid to the City
of Fort Worth; and
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills City Council at a workshop on
March 31, 1992 was given a briefing on the new communications
system; and
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills City Council at its regular
meeting of June 8, 1992, was asked to adopt a resolution
endorsing the acquisition of the system by the City of Fort Worth
and confirming the City of North Richland Hills policy regarding
participation in said system; and
WHEREAS, The City of North Richland Hills City Council is requested to
authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with the City of
Fort Worth under the inter-local jurisdictional agreement
provisions of State law; and
WHEREAS, The City of North Richland Hills City Council is requested to
authori ze the City Purchas i ng Agent to execute a contract wi th
Motorola, Inc. for the acquisition of mobile, portable and fixed
site radios and other related devices which is part of this radio
system; and
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills City Council voted to approve
such RESOLUTION and directed that it be reduced to writing;
l-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tt
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the North Richland Hills City
Council:
That it hereby declares that the policy of the City of North Richland
Hills City Council is to endorse the acquisition by the City of Fort Worth
of an inter-agency communications system by means of a contract with
Motorola, Inc., as outlined in M&C C-13137 adopted by the Fort Worth City
Council on November 19, 1991.
It is further declared to be the policy of the City of North Richland
Hills that it will cooperate and coordinate with the City of Fort Worth to
facilitate inter-agency communications between the City of North Richland
Hills departments and other agencies, including the City of Fort Worth, for
effi c i ent and economi ca 1 ut i 1 i zat i on of the i nter- agency commun i cat ions
capabilities of the new system, and toward that end it is the policy of the
City of North Richland Hills City Council that the City of North Richland
Hills will participate in its appropriate share of the cost of the
infrastructure for the new communications system as determined by the City
of North Richland Hills City Council.
It is also declared that the policy of the City of North Richland
Hills is to authorize the City Manager and City Purchasing Agent to proceed
with purchase and implementation of an inter-agency radio system by means
of a contract with the City of Fort Worth for access to their radio
infrastructure and with Motorola, Inc. for purchase of radios and
equipment.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 1992.
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Fina.nce
Council Meeting Date: 6/8/92
ubject:
R~~nl11t;nn No. 92-27 Authorizing Signatures
for Release of Pledged Securities
Agenda Number: GN 92-71
. NationsBank is requesting an updated resolution for the required signatures to
, release pledged securities with the former NCNB and the Federal Reserve Bank
of Dallas. Signatures are as follows:
Tonuny Brown
Jeanette Rewis
Lee Maness
Victor Jones
Mayor
City Secretary
Director of Finance
Senior Staff Accountant
Recommendation:
I It is recommended that Resolution No. 92-27 be approved.
I
I
I
~
I
'I
I
I
Finance Review
~ource of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Av
Operating Budget uJ.
I Other /:7 -
~ /1(~~,/
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Fmance Director
Page 1 of
1
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Resolution 92-27
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT:
1.
The following officers of the Ci ty of North Richland
Hills, Texas are hereby authorized to execute the Joint Safekeeping
Official Signature Card on behalf of the governing body of the
City:
Name
Signature
Victor Jones
Lee Maness
Jeanette Rewis
2 .
The Mayor be and is hereby authorized to execute the
signature card, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof and marked Exhibit "A", as the act and deed of the City.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 8th day of June, 1992.
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
_epartment:
Subject:
Administration
Tobacco Free Policy for City Buildings
Ordinanco No. 1801
Council Meeting Date: 6/8/92
Agenda Number: GN 92-72
As previously discussed with the City Council the attached ordinance needs to
be adopted to implement the IITobacco Free Policyll in our City buildings. A
Management policy imposing this prohibition regarding City employees was put
into effect June 1st. The proposed ordinance will apply to all persons in City
buildings, including visitors.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1804.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
·e, Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. /)
/~11t r/~
, I
Department He d Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL, ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I'
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1804
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT:
1.
It shall hereafter be unlawful for any person to smoke tobacco, chew tobacco or dip
tobacco or snuff within the confines of any city-owned and operated building.
2.
It is the intent of the Council in passing this ordinance to create a smoke-free and
tobacco-free environment within all city buildings.
3.
Notice of this ordinance shall be given by posting written "THIS FACILITY IS
TOBACCO FREE" signs at or near the main entrance of each building. Each letter in the
sign shall be at least 1.5 inches in height.
4.
Any person violating this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not
in excess of $200 for each offense.
5.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its date of passage and
publication as provided by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 8th day of June, 1992.
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown - Mayor
A TrEST:
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire - Attorney for City
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
epartment: City Secretary
- Council Meeting Date: 6/8/92
Appointment to Teen Court Advisorv Board
Agenda Number: GN 92-7 3
Place 2 on the q~~~.p. Court ~9v.j.sory,. .ßoard is currently. vacant.
Murphy has been recommended to fill the vacancy.
MB-.. .Sharon
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council approve the appointment.
I
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
·KM:~
Department Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Finance/Purchasing ~ Council Meeting Date: 6/8/92
SubJ'ect: Award Bid for Emergency Generator Replacement A d N b PU 92-16
and Installation gen a urn er:_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The replacement of the emergency generator for City Hall was
budgeted in the comprehensive three year utility CIP program.
Sealed proposals were solicited for this project and the results
are outlined below.
VENDOR GENERATOR INSTALLATION
Hargrove Electric $15,404 $11,760
Waukesha- Pearce 14,612 NB
Moody Day 13,250 NB
Diversified Electronic NB 5,900
I
I
I
I
I
The specifications requested the generator and the electrical
installation be quoted separate. The generator quoted by Moody
Day and the installation proposal submitted by Diversified
Electronics does not meet the minimum specifications. The
proposal submitted by Diversified Electronics did not include the
concrete or plumbing requirements, the crane that is necessary to
remove the old generator and install the new generator or the
insurance coverage.
Recommendation: It is requested Council consider awarding the
bid for the generator to Waukesha- Pearce in the amount of
$14,612 and award the contract for installation to Hargrove
Electric in the amount of $11,760 for a total of $26,372.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other ~
¿Z ~~1~¿ .. .
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number 02-92-01-6000
ds Available
. Fmance Director
I
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Administration '. Council Meeting Date: 6/8/92
Award of Bid for Sale of City Property Lot A,
Subject: Block 1, Browning- Heiqhts North Addition Agenda Number: PU 92-17
The City received one bid for the sale of Lot A, Block 1, Browning Heights
North Addition. The bidder was E.K. Arledge in the amount of $1,001.00. The
property is an old well site and the well needs to be plugged before the deed
is executed. If the well is not plugged before we sell the lot, the City would
face a long-term liability for pollution of the aquifer.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council accept the bid of E.K. Arledge in the
amount of $1,001.00 and order the well plugged before the deed is delivered.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating â t
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Finance
Council Meeting Date: 6/8/92
Subject:
Minor Drainage Improvements for 1992
Agenda Number: PW 92-14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Minor drainage projects have been funded from the Street Departments's
miscellaneous drainage expense account in the past. The budget allocation for
that line-item expense account has been depleted for the current fiscal year.
In order to accommodate additional projects, it has been recommended by the CIP
Committee to appropriate $50,000 from Unspecified Drainage Funds.
Fundina Source:
Sufficient funds are available from Unspecified Drainage Funds and may be
appropriated as indicated below:
From:
Unspecified Drainage Funds
$50,000
TO:
13-50-92-6000
Minor Drainage Improvements
for 1992
$50,000
Recommendation:
It is recommended that $50,000 be appropriated as indicated above for Minor
Drainage Improvements.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number See above
Sufficient Funds Available
.--z::; 7Jf::
;€117~
, City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Fenance Director
I
I
Page 1 of 1
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~
~
~
~
~ Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_operating Budget
~ Othe
I
apartment:
Public Works/Utilities
Approval of Proposal for Water and
WA~tAwAtAr Impact Fee Verification Study
Council Meeting Date: 6/08/92
Agenda Number: PW 92-!-15
In accordance with the requirements of Texas Local Government Code (TLGC), Title 12., Subtitle C"
Chapter 395 (alias Senate Bill 336), the City must review the impact fee land use assumptions and '
capital improvements plan at least every three years. The three years is measured from the date the
capital improvement plan was adopted by the City on June 11, 1990. In order for the Capital
Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) to review the past collections and development
adequately, staff recommends the Council approve the proposals for consultant services from Reed-
Stowe & Company and Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc.
The consultants ·will first provide a "verification" of the existing impact fee levels. They will make<-,
sure the existing impact fees do not exceed the revised impact fees by more than 10%. The revised
fees will be based on a current land use assumption plan and a current capital improvements plan
both revised'to reflect recent development and improvements since June, 1990. If the existing fees .
can be verified to not exceed revised fees by 10%, the CIAC and Council will have the option on
whether to proceed with a full update study or not. This is covered in TLGC 395.0575.
Reed-Stowe & Company proposes to provide the following services for a not to exceed ,$15,000 fee.
·
Manage the overall project, including assurance that all project milestone deadlines are
established and adhered to;
·
Calculate the reconciled Impact Fees based upon actual CIP expenditures and actual Living
Unit Equivalent growth over the last 2 years;
·
Attend all work sessions of the staff and engineers as well as public meetings of the City
Council, Impact Fee Advisory Committee, and Public Hearings required relating to the fees
through the duration of the project;
·
Assure that all statutory requirements of "Senate Bill 336" as amended are followed;
·
Present findings before the North Richland Hills City Council.
Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. proposes to provide the following services for a not to exceed
$25,000 fee.
·
Enter existing NRH and Watauga Zoning Maps into Geographical Information System (GIS) by
digitizing.
·
Outline developed and undeveloped areas into GIS.
Finance Review
-
. Finance Director
See next page.
-
rtment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
2
I,
M
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· Enter land use assumptions for NRH and Watauga into GIS.
· Enter all future water and wastewater system improvements into GIS.
· Gather data to be entered, analyze data, make required calculations, and prepare report.
· Attend all work sessions, CIAC meetings, Council meetings, etc., as required.
The costs incurred for these consultant services can be paid for out of impact fee funds.
Fundina Source:
Sufficient funds are available from City funded Unspecified Projects and may be appropriated as
indicated below:
From: 1992 Unspecified City Funded Projects
$40,000
To: Impact Fee Update Study 1992'
02-92-12-6000,
$40,000
Recommendation:
The staff recommends the approval of both the Reed-Stowe & Company proposal and the Knowlton-
English-Flowers, Inc. proposal for the subject impact fee verification study.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
'I
ie
I
I
Its
ItEElt-STtt\\'E & t~...
GOVERNMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES
May 6, 1992
" ,
:' ' ; I \ ¡ . ;.2: Y ~) {J !~;92
: I ;1
lJ~~,;
'~ LJ L--_____
..-------~~ ".. ....----
Mr. Greg Dickens
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
P. o. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609
¡
t
----------:
Re: Impact Fee Study, Phase I and II
Dear Mr. Dickens:
Pursuant to your request, Reed-Stowe & Co. is pleased to have this opportunity to
propose our assistance to the City of North Richland Hills (the City) in the performance
of Phase I, Verification of Existing Impact Fees Imposed and Phase II, Development of
Future Impact Fees to be Imposed. Reed-Stowe & Co. is uniquely qualified to assist the
City with this project:
o We managed and participated in the City's previous Impact Fee Study and
are thoroughly familiar with the City's record keeping and operations;
o We have overseen the successful completion of six Impact Fee Studies for
various cities in the Metroplex over the past four years; and
o Our Austin office allows us to keep abreast of the latest environmental and
legislative requirements enacted upon such utilities.
Phase I
The City has requested that we provide a separate cost estimate for performing a
reconciliation of the existing Impact Fee using actual capital improvement expenditures
and actual Living Unit Equivalent (L.U.E.) growth during the period the existing Impact
Fees have been in effect. Assuming that adequate CIP expenditure records are available,
the estimated cost to complete this phase of the project is $15,000 and would be
completed by September, 1992. At the completion of Phase I, the Impact Fee Advisory
Committee will submit a report and recommendations concerning the existing fees.
Should the report recommend, and the Council agree, that an updated study be required,
Phase II of the project would be initiated.
12770 COlT ROAD AT LBJ FVVY., SUITE 1 107
DALLAS. TEXAS 75251
(214) 458-9388
FAX (21 4) 458-0205
1 06 E. SIXTH STREET. SUITE 650
AUSTIN. TEXAS 78701
[51 2) 479-0991
FAX (512) 479-0992
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Phase II
Based upon prior conversations with City staff, it is our understanding that the City will
be engaging the professional engineering services required to update the City's Land
Use Assumption Plan and Water/Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan (CIP Plan). Reed-
Stowe & Co. would propose to provide the following services relating to this Impact Fee
Study:
o Manage the overall project, including assurance that all project milestone
deadlines are established and adhered to;
o Calculate the required Impact Fees based upon three (3) Land Use and CIP
Plan scenarios;
o Attend all work sessions of the staff and engineers as well as public
meetings of the City Council, Impact Fee Advisory Committee, and Public
Hearings required relating to the fees through the duration of the project;
o Assure that all statutory requirements of "Senate Bill 336" as amended are
followed; and
o Present findings before the North Richland Hills City Council.
Reed-Stowe & Co. bills its clients monthly for professional services rendered plus out-ot-
pocket expenses incurred at cost. Monthly billings shall include the number of hours
worked and specific activity for each individual charging hours to the project. Daily time
sheets are maintained in our Dallas office and will be available for review during regular
business hours. Our standard hourly billing rates are as follows:
Managing Partner, J. Stowe
Partner, K. Reed
Senior Consultants, Y. Thompson, P.E.
Clerical, K. Staritz/D. Katz
Clerical Assistance, B. Scribner
$170.00
$125.00
$90.00
$25.00
$12.50
Based upon the above scope of services, we estimate that this phase ot the project can
be successfully completed by May, 1993, for not to exceed $40,000 plus out-ot-pocket
expenses incurred at cost. Should our level of effort required be less than estimated, our
fee will be adjusted downward accordingly.
We have attached our proposed time schedule of events required for the completion ot
both Phases I and " of the project to be in compliance with "SB 336." This schedule has
been discussed with your engineers and as can be seen, it covers approximately 17
months. At the current time the engineers are in concurrence with our suggested time
schedule.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Our proposal has been prepared based upon our understanding of the City's
requirements. If our understanding is not in compliance with the desires of the City, we
would be pleased to amend our proposal to incorporate the level of effort desired by the
City .
Reed-Stowe & Co. appreciates this opportunity to continue our professional relationship
with the City of North Richland Hills. Should you or anyone at the City have any
questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Keith Reed or Ms. Yvette
Thompson at (214) 458-9388. We look forward to our continued association.
Very truly yours,
-~ ~ Cð
I
Ie
I
. .
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS IMPACT FEE COLLECTION VERIFICATION
THURSDAY 16-Apr-92 RECEIVED PROPOSED LAND USE ASSUMS, SCHED. CIP,IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
ISUNDAY 18-May-92 OBTAIN ACTUAL FUNDING SOURCES AND IMPACT FEES COLLECTED
SUNDAY 01-Jun-92 OBTAIN FORECAST OF ADDITIONAL FEE COLLECTION THRU PERTINENT TIME FRAME
WEDNESDAY 02-Jul-92 OBTAIN ACTUAL CIP CONSTRUCTED FROM ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS
I WEDNESDAY 16-Jul-92 OBTAIN FORECAST OF REMAINDER OF CONSTRUCTION THRU PERTINENT TIME FRAME
WEDNESDAY 30-Jul-92 CALCULATE ACTUAL NEEDED IMPACT FEE
WEDNESDAY 13-Aug-92 PREPARE IMPACT FEE STATUS REPORT. IF NEW FEE<.9*OLD FEE THEN GO TO -B-
ISUNDAY 24-A:9-92 ADVISORY COMMITTEE MAKES PRESENTATION TO COUNCIL ON IMPACT FEE STATUS
B
IWEDNESDAY 27-Aug-92 PREPARE ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL INCLUDING crp SCHEDULE ACCELERATION FEASIBILITY
SUNDAY 14-Sep-92 ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETS TO DISCUSS FEE OVER COLLECTION & ALTERNATIVES
SUNDAY 28-Sep-92 ADVISORY COMMITTEE MAKES PRESENTATION TO COUNCIL ON IMPACT FEE STATUS
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
Ie
I
SUNDAY
I SUNDAY
THURSDAY
SUNDAY
I SUNDAY
SUNDAY
SUNDAY
I TUESDAY
SUNDAY
SUNDAY
SUNDAY
I SUNDAY
THURSDAY
SUNDAY
I SUNDAY
SUNDAY
SUNDAY
I TUESDAY
SUNDAY
-"NDAY
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS IMPACT FEE UPDATE
07 -Sep-92 BEGIN TO DEVELOP LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS - 60 DAYS
26-0ct-92 WORK SESSION WITH ADVISORY COMMITTEE
06-Nov-92 MAKE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AVAILABLE TO PUBLIC
09-Nov-92 NOTICE 1 FOR LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING
16-Nov-92 NOTICE 2 FOR LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING
09-Nov-92 HEARING NOTICE WITHIN 2 YEARS BY CERTIFIED MAIL
23-Nov-92 NOTICE 3 FOR LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING
09-Dec-92 DEADLINE FOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE WRITTEN COMMENTS
14-Dec-92 PUBLIC HEARING ON LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
Q4-Jan-93 DEADLINE FOR COUNCIL ADOPTION/REJECTION OF LAND USE
04-Jan-93 BEGIN TO DEVELOP CIP AND IMPACT FEES - 60 DAYS
22-Feb-93 WORK SESSION WITH ADVISORY COMMITTEE
05-Mar-93 MAKE CIP AND FEE DEVELOPMENT AVAILABLE TO PUBLIC
08-Mar-93 NOTICE 1 FOR CIP AND FEE DEVELOPMENT
15-Mar-93 NOTICE 2 FOR CIP AND FEE DEVELOPMENT
08-Mar-93 HEARING NOTICE WITHIN 2 YEARS BY CERTIFIED MAIL
22-Mar-93 NOTICE 3 FOR CIP AND FEE DEVELOPMENT
07-Apr-93 DEADLINE FOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE WRITTEN COMMENTS
12-Apr-93 PUBLIC HEARING ON CIP AND DEVELOPMENT OF FEE
10-May-93 DEADLINE FOR COUNCIL ADOPTION/REJECTION OF FEES
I.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
KEITH E. REED
Present Position
Partner, Reed-Stowe & Co.
Mr. Reed's professional career has been highlighted by his role as Director of
Finance for the City of Arlington, Texas from 1962-1984. During this period the city grew
from a population of approximately 30,000 to 225,000. Mr. Reed resigned this position
to found Reed Municipal Services, Inc. (RMS), a consulting firm dedicated to the Public
Sector. RMS was engaged by two major international accounting and consulting firms
to assist them in the development of a Public Sector practice. In 1986 RMS entered into
a partnership agreement with the Public Sector consulting firm of Aries Resource
Management to form the firm of Reed-Stowe & Co.
Mr. Reed's municipal and consulting career has encompassed a significant number
of projects for which he was responsible. A summary of selected projects is as follows:
System Planning Design and Implementation
Supervised design and implementation of complete automated financial
operation and information system to be implemented in phases so as not
to be an operational burden on all operating departments simultaneously,
Components of the system were:
*
General ledger and budgetary expenditure and revenue chart of
accounts to be used by all operating departments within all funds of
the city.
*
Building inspection permit issuance and billings for permits issued by
builder name and category of permit.
*
Municipal airport billings for processing gasoline sales, hanger rentals
and tie downs.
*
Tax revenue billings for both real and personal property by property
category within geographic zones.
*
Water revenue billings by customer class, consumption bracket and
amount. System provides user history to be used in future rate
increase analysis.
*
Sewer revenue billings by customer class, usage bracket and amount.
System provides user history to be used in future rate increase
analysis.
I.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
,I
I
Ie
I
I
KEITH E. REED
(Continued)
*
Automated vehicle maintenance history system to control parts
inventory and provide daily maintenance history on individual vehicles.
Supervised design, implementation and administration of investment
program for city. System provides daily accruals for program.
Supervised design, implementation and administration of internal service
charges program for all city departments. System includes postage, printing
charges, copy charges and other internal service charges.
Supervised design, implementation and administration of insurance program
for city (excluding employee health and life). System includes all liability and
casualty coverages for city operations.
Supervised design, implementation and administration of depository contract
with major banking institution. Depository agreement provides for
investment strategies depending upon various economic conditions.
Supervised design, implementation and administration of total purchasing
and encumbrance system to be used by all operating departments to
provide expenditure control after budget approval.
Supervised design, implementation and administration of accounting,
purchasing and petty cash procedures manual to be used by all operations
of the city.
Financial Operations and Activities
Performed economic feasibility analysis on behalf of the City of Arlington to
evaluate alternative wastewater diversions and their related financial impact. The study
identified potential annual operating savings ranging from $500,000 to $1,000,000 in
wastewater operations.
Coordinated and supervised a $54,700,000 advance refunding of all City of
Arlington Waterworks and Sewer System Revenue Bonds.
I.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
re
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
KEITH E. REED
(Continued)
Coordinated and supervised issuance of approximately $160,000,000 of
additional General Obligation and Revenue Bonds over a period of years in
a variety of issues.
Supervised design and administration of cash control procedures and
operations at Arlington Stadium. These procedures include revenue
generated from parking charges, food and beverages sales, and gift and
souvenir sales; approximately $5,500,000 annually.
Supervised accounting and purchasing control of annual operating budget
in excess of $110,000,000 and capital budget of approximately $25,000,000,
City representative in utility rate cases relating to regulated utilities, Le., Lone
Star Gas Co., Texas Utilities Electric Co. (formerly Texas Electric Service
Company), and Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supervised design and implementation of streetlight cost reduction plan for
city resulting in a cash savings in excess of $325,000 during the first eight
months of operations.
Served on employee job description review board. Prepared and reviewed
new and existing job descriptions and assessed relative value and assigned
to a particular pay grade.
Prepared job descriptions and assisted in development of job classification
and compensation plan for Texas city of 25,000 population.
Prepared purchasing and Petty Cash Policies and Procedures for various
municipalities.
Assisted in preparation of a financial analysis of a Streetlighting Cost
Reduction Plan for Phoenix and Tempe, Arizona.
Assisted in financial analysis of city-prepared streetlighting feasibility study
of Clearwater, Florida.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
re
I
I
I
I
I
,I
Ie
I
I
KEITH E. REED
(Continued)
Assisted in the preparation and financial analysis of Natural Gas rate cases
before the City Councils of the following cities:
Carrollton, Texas
Addison, Texas
Galveston, Texas
Arlington, Texas
Euless, Texas
Waco, Texas
Lewisville, Texas
Mesquite, Texas
Wichita Falls, Texas
Farmers Branch, Texas
Wylie, Texas
Sherman, Texas
Hurst, Texas
Bedford, Texas
Paris, Texas
Flower Mound, Texas
Rockwall, Texas
Assisted in the preparation and financial analysis of water and wastewater
projects for the following:
Mesquite
Denison
Wylie
Paris
Farmers Branch
Sachse
Meridian Capital Corp.
United Irrigation District
North Richland Hills
Lewisville
Grapevine
Arlington
Devers Irrigation System
Rowlett
Walnut Creek Water Supply
Fort Worth, Texas
Assisted in the preparation and financial analysis of utility rates and/or
operations of:
Southwestern Bell Telephone
Texas Electric Service Co. (T.U. Electric)
Lone Star Gas Co.
Southern Union Gas Co.
Arizona Public Service Co. (Phoenix & Tempe)
Salt River Project (Phoenix & Tempe)
Florida Public Service
Texas-New Mexico Electric Co.
Gulf States Utilities
Southwestern Public Service
Indianapolis Power and Light
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
KEITH E. REED
(Continued)
Developed capital recovery fees in compliance with Chapter 395, Local
Government Code S8336, for:
City of Mesquite (water & wastewater)
City of Lewisville (water & wastewater)
City of Grapevine (water & wastewater)
City of Wylie (water & wastewater)
City of North Richland Hills (water, wastewater & drainage)
Education
Arlington State College (now University of Texas at Arlington),
B.B.A., Finance
1.8.M. Executive Seminars for Governmental Finance Officers
(three separate seminars)
U.S. Army School of Supply, Material and Logistical Support,
Fort Bliss, Texas
U.S. Army School of Ordinance Operations, Fort Ord, California
Professional
Served on Governor's Tax Committee for three years
Received Debt Management Award from Municipal Advisory Council of Texas
Past President of Texas Chapter, Government Finance Officers Association
Member of National and State Chapter, Government Finance Officers
Association
Lectured at University of Texas at Arlington on governmental
accounting and finance.
Served as program chairman for North Central Texas Council of Governments'
programs pertaining to Municipal Financial Operations
Member of Texas Municipal League
Member of Texas Chapter, Institute of Traffic Engineers
Member of Texas Engineering Extension Service, Texas A&M University
University of Texas at Arlington Alumni Association
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
KEITH E. REED
(Continued)
Seminars and Publications
"Municipal Ownership of Street Lighting Systems - Myth or Miracle"
CAL-SLA - California Street Lighting Association - 1985
"The Requirement of S.8. 336"
Study Group of Texas City Management Association
Central Region of Texas City Management Association
Gulf Coast Chapter of the Texas Governmental Finance Officers
Association
Government Finance Officers Association of Texas Newsletter
"A New Challenge for Municipal Gas Regulation"
"The Case of the Vanishing Gross Receipts Tax"
"Impact of S.8. 336"
Texas A&M Extension Service (TEEX)
"Utility Administration in City Management"
I.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
:1
Ie
I
I
YVETTE MYERS THOMPSON, P .E.
Present Position
Senior Consultant, Reed-Stowe & Co.
Prior to joining Reed-Stowe & Co. in 1989, Ms. Thompson was Project Coordinator
for the Dallas North Tollway Automatic Vehicle Identification (Toll Tag) project for
the Texas Turnpike Authority. Ms. Thompson gained 4 years of engineering
design, project construction and project management experience with Frito-Lay and
financial analysis experience with a major commercial investor.
More specifically, Ms. Thompson's technical and financial experience include:
*
Development of rate base analysis for the City of Austin in their negotiations
with Lower Colorado River Authority for water rates. Included review of
LCRA's cost of service study and development of settlement parameters.
Conducted litigation support for the City of Arlington vs. the City of Fort
Worth regarding wastewater services.
*
*
Participation in Southwestern Bell Telephone Rate Case for Customer Cities
before the Public Utility Commission of Texas.
*
Participation in analysis for litigation involving Southwestern Bell Telephone
vs. City of Mesquite concerning franchise payment.
*
Development of rate base for the Customer Cities of Texas-New Mexico
Power Company Rate Case before the Public Utility Commission of Texas.
*
Responsibility for analysis of cost of service and customer allocation for
wastewater service contract negotiations between the Cities of Sachse and
Rowlett and the City of Garland.
*
Conducted design and implementation of project cost tracking system
which ties into existing funds accounts numbering systems of the Cities of
Grapevine and Lewisville.
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
YVETTE MYERS THOMPSON, P .E.
(Continued)
*
Development of drainage, water and wastewater impact fees and their
collection procedures as mandated by Senate Bill 336 for the Cities of
Grapevine, Lewisville, Mesquite, Wylie and North Richland Hills, Texas.
Involves design of P.C. model which considers population growth, financial
requirements resulting from growth-oriented capital improvements and
funding options when determining impact fees.
Responsibility for litigation support for the City of Farmers Branch vs. the
City of Dallas Water Utilities.
*
*
Extensive computer modeling and data management experience. Designed
and implemented budget forecasting model for Texas Turnpike Authority.
*
Extensive engineering system process design/development experience
including scheduling, budgeting and construction supervision.
Education
University of Texas at Austin
BS in Mechanical Engineering with high honors, 8/83
Full Graduate Scholarship Recipient
Twelve graduate hours in Mechanical Systems, 12/83
Southern Methodist University
MBA, 8/89
Full Merit Scholarship Recipient
Professional Affiliations
Beta Gamma Sigma, National Business Scholastic
Honor Society
Registered Professional Engineer, Texas #68521
National Society of Professional Engineers
Texas Society of Professional Engineers
Certified Woman Business Enterprise in both Dallas and Austin, Texas
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
3 .:;:~r2
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
_ R"__,~,., _..._.... '" _,_...... ~ __ ~ ~
.' -""If., ""__., '__-.._-..-.....--._.._..,~_______~_. ,,.~. ._
May 6, 1992
Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E.,
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: 3-431, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
WA TER AND SEWER IMPACT FEE UPDA TE
A UTHORIZA TION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
As instructed, we are presenting this proposal for Engineering Services to perform an update
study of your existing Water and Sanitary Sewer System Impact Fees. The City Council
adopted Water and Sewer Impact Fees on June 11, 1990, by approval of Ordinance No.
1679, (GN 90-88). The rates set were subsequently adjusted on January 28, 1991, by
Council action on Item GN 91-12, as required to include City of Fort Worth "pass-through"
charges in the basic fee structure.
Senate Bill 336, enacted by the Texas Legislature in 1987, with subsequent amendments,
provides authorization for local governments to enact and impose impact fees for capital
improvements related to water and wastewater facilities. As required by this bill, the
original Impact Fee Study, which was conducted by K-E-F and Reed-Stowe & Co., a Land
Use Assumption Map and Report were prepared which included assumptions about population
growth, employment, and land use which would occur in the lO-year period from 1991 to the
year 2000. A Capital Improvements Program was developed as required to support the
assumed growth in this lO-year period and beyond until ultimate development of the Service
Area, (which includes both North Richland Hills and Watauga),
Senate Bill 336 also provides for the review and update, as required, of the Land Use
Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan every three years. Actual growth and
development are compared with the previous assumptions, and the Capital Improvements
Program is moditied, if required, along with the Fee Structure, subject to Council action.
Since a new Land Use Plan is being prepared by the Community Development Department
for Council consideration of approval, the current Land Use Assumption Plan will probably
require extensive revisions. These Land Use Assumption modifications will also require
changes in the Capital Improvements Plans, and thus require moditications in the Impact Fee
cornputation procedures.
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550. BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 .817/283-6211 . METRO 817/267-3367. FAX 817/354-4389
I.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Page 2, May 6, 1992, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update Authorization
With implementation of the new Geographical Information System, (G.I.S.), more accurate
mapping and support data are available for the update study. We recommend that the Land
Use Assumption Plan be digitized and integrated into the G.I.S. database as a new map
coverage. Much more accurate classitication and computation of land use areas will be
possible after computerization of the Land Use Assumption Map. We are also
recommending that the future proposed water and sewer facilities be added to the G.I.S.
coverage along with the previously digitized existing water and sewer facilities. Future
developments and updates will be much quicker and less expensive to perform.
This project consists of potentially two parts, "A" and "B". Part "A" includes a Verification
of the existing Impact Fees to deternline if they are in compliance with the law. Part "B"
includes a Update Study of the Impact Fees if it is determined from the Verification Phase
that the recalculation is required.
The following is a preliminary outline, which is based on a tentative schedule prepared by
Reed-Stowe & Co., indicating the general tasks which must be performed in the Water and
Wastewater Impact Fee Veritication and Update Study:
APPROX.DATE PERFORMED BY
TASK DESCRIPTION
PHASE "A" - VERIFICATION
05-08-92
KEF, RIS
Submit proposal for update of Impact Fee Study to City,
which Includes incorporation of updated Land Use
Assumptions, Population Densities, and Future Water and
Sewer Facilities into the City's Geographical Information
System, (G.I.S.), which will improve the City's monitoring
and control of Impact Fee Collections and reduce the cost
of required future Impact Fee Update Studies.
05-11-92
KEF
City Manager authorize KEF to begin preparation of G.I.S.
computerized Land Use Assumption Map by digitizing
existing Zoning Map.
06-08-92
Council
Council approve new revised Land Use Master Plan
prepared under the direction of the Community
Development/Planning Department. This Land Use Plan will
be the basis for revisions to the detailed Land Use
Assumption Map.
Award.~ Study to KEF and Reed-Stowe & Co.
06-08-92 Council
06-1 6-92 Finance Dept.
06-20-92 KEF, RIS
07-01-92 KEF
Provide previous Impact Fee Collection data to Consultants.
Work with City Staff to develop revised Land Use
Assumptions based on new Land Use Master Plan.
Assist City in providing forecast of Fee Collection Growth
anticipated to occur before the end of this review period,
(June, 1993), and furnish this data to R/S.
/ (
I,
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Page 3, May 6, 1992, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update Authorization
08-01-92
KEF
08-1 5-92
KEF
08-29-92
R/S
09-07-92
KEF
09-12-92
KEF, R/S
09-22-92
KEF, R/S
09-26-92 KEF, R/S
10-13-92 KEF, R/S
10-26-92 KEF, R/S
10-27-92 KEF, R/S
11-06-92 City
11-09-92 City
11-16-92 City
11-23-92 City
12-09-92 Advisory Comm.
1 2-14-92 KEF, R/S
01-04-93 Council
01-04-92 KEF, R/S
Assist City in providing actual C.I.P. Construction data to
R/S.
Assist City in providing forecast of CIP projects anticipated
to begin before the end of this review period, (June, 1993),
and furnish this data to R/S.
Compute actual needed Impact Fees.
Complete digitized Land Use Assumption Map revision
based on new Land Use Master Plan. Also, include
developed and undeveloped area data furnished by the
Community Development Department, along with portions
of undeveloped areas which will be assumed to develop in
the remaining 10-year period until the year 2000.
Prepare Impact Fee Status Report. If the New Computed
fee is less than 90-percent of the Old Fee, then perform the
next item below I otherwise if the City has over-collected
impact fees proceed to Phase" 8 ft I Update Study.
Assist Advisory Committee in presentation to Council of
Impact Fee Status Report.
PHASE "B" -- UPDATE STUDY
Prepare alternative proposal including CIP Schedule
Acceleration Feasibility.
Meet with Advisory Committee to discuss Fee Over-
Collection and Alternatives.
Attend Work Session with Advisory Committee.
Assist Advisory Committee in presentation of Impact Fee
Status to Council.
Make Land Use Assumptions available to the Public.
Publish Notice No. 1 for Land Use Public Hearing.
Publish Notice No.2 for Land Use Public Hearing.
Publish Notice NO.3 for Land Use Public Hearing.
Deadline for Advisory Committee written Comments.
Attend public hearing on Land Use Assumptions.
Deadline for Council Adoption or Rejection of revised Land
Use Map.
Develop new C.I.P. based on revised Land Use
Assumptions and Calculate new Impact Fees.
I,
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Page 4, May 6, 1992, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update Authorization
02-22-93 KEF, R/S
03-05-93 City
03-08-93 City
03-08-93 City
03-08-93 City
04-07 -93 Advisory Comm.
04-12-93 KEF, R/S
05-10-93 Council
Meet with Advisory Committee in Work Session.
Make revised C.I.P. and Development Assumptions
available to Public.
Publish Notice No. 1 for C.I.P. & Fee Development.
Publish Notice No.2 for C.I.P. & Fee Development.
Publish Notice No. 3 for C.I.P. & Fee Development.
Deadline for Advisory Committee written comments.
Attend Public Hearing on C.I.P. & Development of Impact
Fees.
Deadline for Council Adoption or Rejection of Fees.
Engineering services required to be performed for this assignment by Knowlton-English-
Flowers, Inc., Consulting Engineers shall be as outlined in Section II, (D), of our
It Agreement for Engineering Services 1/ Contract dated June 13, 1977, and shall consist of
furnishing digitized G.I.S. data tape of maps and database described herein, along with a
written Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Veritication Study Report. Compensation to the
engineer shall be in accordance with Section VI, (D), of the Engineering Services Contract,
and shall be based on the following estÌInated charges:
PHASE If A If -- VERIFICATION
G.I.S. Computerized Mapping Coverages
Current NRH Zoning Map
Current Watauga Zoning Map
NRH Developed/Undeveloped Areas
Watauga Developed/Undeveloped Areas
Future NRH Land Use Assumptions
Future Watauga Land Use Assumptions
$5,000.00
1,500.00
2,500.00
500.00
5,000.00
500.00
Total Land Use Assumption Map and Database
$1 5,000.00
Future Proposed Water System Facilities
Future Proposed Sewer System Facilities
Thiessen Polygon Map for Water Demand Distribution
Thiessen/Land Use Composite for Demand Calculations
Detailed Sanitary Sewer Service Areas
Sewer Areas/Land Use COJnposite for Denland Cales.
$500.00
1 ,000.00
500.00
500.00
1,500.00
500.00
Total Miscellaneous Water and Sewer Analysis Maps
$4,500.00
Total G.I.S. Computerized Maps required for Impact Fee Verification Study
$19,500.00
(Proposed Fees Continued next page ...)
I.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Page 5, May 6, 1992, Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update Authorization
Professional Services Associated with Fee Verification Report Preparation
Including Data Gathering, Calculations, Analysis and Report Writing
$5.500.00
TOTAL PHASE "A" (VERIFICATION) ENGINEERING FEE
$25,000.00
Engineering Charges associated with Phase "B", Comprehensive Impact Fee Report Update
and Fee Recalculations, shall be provided by separate Proposal after completion of the Phase
"A" Assignment outlined above, and after a ITIOre detailed scope of services has been
established.
We are available to discuss this proposal for Engineering Services with the City Staff and
Council at your convenience. Due to the demand by other Departments for the Zoning Map,
including Economic Development, Community Development, in addition to Public Works,
we are prepared to begin immediately with digitizing the current Zoning Map if directed by
the City Manager to do so. We would then have an additional month to work on this part of
the study pending Council authorization for the full Impact Fee Verification assignment
outlined above.
Meanwhile, please call if you have any questions.
Ii
, CU,
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P. E, Vice President
RW A/ral auth,431
xc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manager
Mr. Kevin B. Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Utilities
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
§ 395.0515
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE
land use assumptions and capital improvements
plan;
(4) the notice must provide the name and mail-
ing address of the official of the political subdivi-
sion to whom a request for separate hearings
shall be sent; and
(5) the certified mail notice, if applicable, shall
contain the information in Subsections (b)(2)-(4).
(c) In addition, the political subdivision shall com-
ply with all of the other requirements for adopting
land use assumptions, a capital improvements plan,
and impact fee.
(d) If, within the date specified in Subsection
(b)(3), a person requests, in writing, separate hear-
ings on the land use assumptions and capital im-
provements plan, the political subdivision may not
utilize this section. In such event, the political
subdivision may proceed with the public hearing for
which notice has been published, but such hearing
will address land use assumptions, and a second
hearing as required by Sections 395.046-395.051 will
be necessary to address the capital improvements
plan and impact fee.
Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 566, § l(c), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
Sections 2 to 4 of the 1989 Act provide:
"Sec. 2. Ordinances. orders. or procedures implemented under
Chapter 957, Acts of the 70th Legislature. Regular Session. 1987
(Article 1269j-4.11 , Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). prior to the
effective date of this Act shal1 not be held invalid as a result of any
inconsistency with any provision of this Act.
··Sec. 3. ~ othing in this Act shal1 affect the validity of impact
fees heretofore levied for storm water, drainage, or flood control
facilities bv a countywide dÜnrict created and operating under the
provisions 'of ArtH.'!e· XVI, Section 59. of the Texas ConstItution in a
county of 2.1 no.noo or more according to the last preceding federal
census, and all Impact fet:s heretofore levied or assesseò by such a
òistrict are hereby \'aJlrlated. ratified. and confirmed,
I'Sec. 4. If any' prO\'I~10n of this Act or Its applicatIon to any
person or circumstances is held invalid, the in\'alidity does not
affect other provisions or applications of this Act that can be g-iven
effect without the in\'alirl provIsion or application, and to this end
the provisions of this Act are declared to be severable."
§ 395.053. Hearing on Updated Land Use As-
sumptions and Capital Improve-
ments Plan
The governing body of the political subdivision
shall, within 60 days after the date it receives the
update of the land use assumptions and the capital
improvements plan, adopt an order setting a public
hearing to discuss and review the update and shaH
determine whether to amend the plan.
Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. I, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.054. Hearing on Amendments to Land Use
Assumptions, Capital Improvements
Plan, or Impact Fee
A public hearing must be held by the governing
body of the political subdivision to discuss the pro-
posed ordinance, order, or resolution amending land
use assumptions, the capital improvements plan, or
the impact fee. On or before the date of the first
publication of the notice of the hearing on the
amendments, the land use assumptions and the capi-
tal improvements plan, including the amount of any
proposed amended impact fee per service unit, shall
be made available to the public.
Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. I, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
?
I
j
,
)
t
§ 395.055. Notice of Hearing on Amendments to
Land Use Assumptions, Capital Im-
provements Plan, or Impact Fee
(a) Before the 30th day before the date of the
hearing on amendments to the land use assump-
tions, capital improvements plan, or impact fee, the
political subdivision shall send a notice of the hear-
ing by certified mail to any person who has given
written notice by certified or registered mai1 to the
municipal secretary or other designated official of
the political subdivision requesting notice of the
hearing within two years preceding the date of
adoption of the order or resolution setting the public
hearing.
(b) The political subdivision shall publish notice of
the hearing once a week for three consecutive
weeks, the first notice to appear before the 30th day
bu t on or after the 60th day before the date set for
the hearing, in one or more newspapers of general
circulation in each county in which the political
subdivision lies. However, a river authority that is
authorized elsewhere by state law to charge fees
that function as impact fees may publish the re-
quired newspaper notice only in each county in
which the service area lies. The notice of public
hearing may not be in the part of the paper in which
1989. legal notices and classified ads appear and may not
610
§ 395.052. Periodic Update of Land Use Assump-
tions and Capital Improvements
Plan Required
(a) A political subdivision imposing an impact fee
shall update the land use assumptions and capital
improvements plan at least every three years. The
initial three-year period begins on the day the capi-
tal improvements plan is adopted.
(b) The political subdivision shall review and eval-
uate its current land use assumptions and shall
cause an update of the capital improvements plan to
be prepared in accordance with SUbchapter B.
Acts 1989, 71st L€g., rh. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28,
I.
Iteled Use As-
Capital Improve-
Plical subdivision
d it receives the
tions and the capital
rdlsetting a public
th pdate and shall
1e pan.
a),ilf. Aug. 28, 1989.
dnltts to Land Use
\pital Improvements
~l~i. the governing
n I'discuss the pro-
lution amending land
r1~._ements plan, or
t.ate of the first
the hearing on the
ml'ons and the capi-
19 amount of any
)e rvice unit, shall
~.
l.a)'lf. Aug. 28, 1989.
- 0 Amendments to
nPliO Capital Im-
n, pact Fee
fo the date of the
1e and use assump-
tn"j impact fee, the
a tice of the hear-
er who has given
'egistered mail to the
lei' nated official of
es g notice of the
ec ng the date of
jon setting the public
;hlpUbliSh notice of
)r three consecutive
.r lore the 30th day
~f the date set for
~ w apers of general
which the political ,
'ivlauthority that is
} 1 to charge fees
may publish the re-
f in each county in
T,- notice of public
of.e paper in which
appear and may not
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
§ 395.0575
be smaller than one-quarter page of a standard-size
or tabloid-size newspaper, and the headline on the
notice must be in I8-point or larger type.
(c) The notice must contain the following:
(1) a headline to read as follows:
uNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON
AMENDMENT OF IMPACT FEES"
(2) the time, date, and location of the hearing;
(3) a statement that the purpose of the hearing
is to consider the amendment of land use assump-
tions and a capital improvements plan and the
imposition of an impact fee;
(4) an easily understandable description and
map of the service area on which the update is
being prepared: and
(5) a statement that any member of the public
has the right to appear at the hearing and present
evidence for or against the update.
Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.056. Advisory Committee Comments on
.Amendments
The advisory committee created under Section
395.058 shall file its written comments on the pro-
posed amendments to the land use assumptions,
capital improvements plan, and impact fee before
the fifth business day before the date of the public
hearing on the amendments.
Acts 1989. 71st Leg" ch. 1, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
§ 395.057. .Approval of Amendments Required
(a) The political subdivision, within ;30 days after
the date of the public hearing on the amendments,
shall approve or disapprove the amendments of the
land use assumptions and the capital improvements
plan and modification of an impact fee.
(b) An ordinance. order, or resolution approving
the amendments to the land use assumptions, the
capital improvements plan, and imposition of an
impact fee may not be adopted as an emergency
measure.
Acts 1989, 71st Leg.. ch. 1. § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989. I
improvements plan, or impact fee is needed, it may,
as an alternative to the updating requirements of
Sections 395.052-395.057, do the following:
(1) The governing body of the political subdivi-
sion shall, upon determining that an update is
unnecessary and 60 days before publishing the
final notice under this section, send notice of its
determination not to update the land use assump-
tions, capital improvements plan, and impact fee
by certified mail to any person who has, within
two years preceding the date that the final notice
of this matter is to be published, give written
notice by certified or registered mail to the munic-
ipal secretary or other designated official of the
political subdivision requesting notice of hearings
related to impact fees. The notice must contain
the information in Subsections (b)(2)-(5).
(2) The political subdivision shall publish notice
of its determination once a week for three consec-
utive weeks in one or more newspapers with
general circulation in each county in which the
political subdivision lies. However, a river au-·
thority that is authorized elsewhere by state law
to charge fees that function as impact fees may
publish the required newspaper notice only in
each county in which the service area lies. The
notice of public hearing may not be in the part of
the paper in which legal notices and classified ads
appear and may not be smaller than one-quarter
page of a standard-size or tabloid-size newspaper,
and the headline on the notice must be in I8-point
or larger type.
(b) The notice must contain the follow1ng:
(1) a headline to read as follows:
¡'NOTICE OF DETERMINATION NOT TO CP-
DATE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, Ci\PITAL
IMPROVEMENTS PLAN, OR IMPACT FEES";
(2) a statement that the governing body of the
political subdivision has determined that no
change to the land use assumptions, capital im-
provements plan, or impact fee is necessary;
(3) an easily understandable description and a
map of the service area in which the updating has
been determined to be unnecessary;
(4) a statement that if, within a specified date,
which date shall be at least 60 days after publica·
tion of the first notice, a person makes a written
request to the designated official of the political
subdivision requesting that the land use assump-
tions, capital improvements plan, or impact fee be
updated, the governing body must comply with
§ 395.0575. Determination That No Update of
Land Use Assumptions. Capital
Improvements Plan, or Impact
Fees is Needed
(a) If, at the time an update under Section 395.-
052 is required, the governing boòy determines that
no change to the land use assumptions. capital
611
§ 395.0575
commission, the commission may act as the advisory
committee if the commission includes at least one
representative of the real estate, development, or
building industry who is not an employee or official
: of a political subdivision or governmental entity. If
. no such representative is a member of the planning
and zoning commission, the commission may stiJJ act
I as the advisory committee if at least one such
representative is appointed by the political subdivi-
sion as an ad hoc voting member of the planning
and zoning commission when it acts as the advisory
committee. If the impact fee is to be applied in the
extraterritorial jurisdiction of the political subdivi-
sion, the membership must include a representative
from that area.
(c) The advisory committee serves in an advisory
capacity and is established to:
(1) advise and assist the political subdivision in
adopting land use assumptions;
(2) review the capital improvements plan and
file written comments;
(3) monitor and evaluate implementation of the
capital improvements plan;
(4) file semiannual reports with respect to the
progress of the capital improvements plan and
report to the political subdivision any perceived
inequities in implementing the plan or imposing
the impact fee; and
(5) advise the political subdivision of the need
to update or revise the land use assumptions,
capital improvements plan, and impact fee.
(d) The political subdivision shal1 make available
to the advisory committee any professional reports
with respect to developing and implementing the
capital improvements plan.
(e) The governing body of the political subdivision
shall adopt procedural rules for the advisory com-
mittee to follow in carrying out its duties.
Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. I, § 82(a), eff. Aug. 28, 1989.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE
the request by following the req uiremen ts of Sec-
tions 395.052-395.057; and
(5) a statement identifying the name and mail-
ing address of the official of the political subdivi-
sion to whom a request for an update should be
sent.
(c) The advisory committee shaH fiJe its written
comments on the need for updating the land use
assumptions, capital improvements plans, and im-
pact fee before the fifth business day before the
earliest notice of the government's decision that no
update is necessary is maiJed or published.
(d) If, by the date specified in Subsection (b)(4), a
person requests in writing that the land use as-
sumptions, capital improvements plan, or impact fee
be updated, the governing body shaH cause an up-
date of the land use assumptions and capital im-
provements plan to be prepared in accordance with
Sections 395.052-395.057.
(e) An ordinance, order, or reso]ution determining
the need for updating land use assumptions, a capi-
tal improvements plan, or an impact fee may not be
adopted as an emergency measure.
Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 566, § l(d), eff. Aug. 28. 1989.
Sections 2 to 4 of the 1989 Act provide:
"Sec. 2. Ordinances, orders, or procedures implemented under
Chapter 957, Acts of the ïOth L€gislature. Regular Session, 1987
(Article 1269j-4.11. Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), prlor to the I
effective date of this Act shall not be held invalid as a result of any
inconsistency with any provision of this Act.
"Sec. 3. Nothing in this Act shall affect the validity of impact
fees heretofore levied for storm water, draina~e, or flood control
facilities by a countywidt' d]str1ct created and operatmg under the
provisions of Article XVI. Spction ,19, of the Texas Constitution in a
~ounty of 2,100,000 or more according- to the last preceding federal
I_'ensus, and all impact fees heretofore levied or assessed by such a
district are hereby validated, ratified, and confirmed,
"Sec. 4. If any provision of this Act or it$ applicatIon to any
µerson or circumstances is held Invalid, the invalidity does not
affect other provisions or applications of this Act that can be g-iven
t>ff{1ct without the invalid prO\'ISIOn or application, and to this end
the provisions of this Act are declared to be severable."
[Sections 395.059 to 395.070 reserved
for expansion]
SUBCHAPTER D.
OTHER PROVISIONS
§ 395.058. Advisory Committee
(a) On or before the date on which the order,
ordinance, or resolution is adopted under Section '
895.042, the political subdivision shall appoint a
capital improvements advisory committee.
(b) The advisory committee is composed of not
less than five members who shaH be appointed by a
majority vote of the governing body of the political
subdivision. Not less than 40 percent of the mem-
bership of the advisory committee must be repre- If the governing body of the political subdivision
sentatives of the real estate, development. or build- does not perform a duty imposed under this chapter
ing industries who are not employees or officials of within the prescribed period, a person who has paid
a political subdivision or governmenta] entity, I f an impact fee or an owner of land on which an
the political subdivision has a planning and zoning impact fee has been paid has the right to present a
612
§ 395.071.
Duties to be Performed Within Time
L i m i ts
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Manaaement Services
Em@rQ@ncy Roof Recair At Library
~ Council Meeting Date: 6-8-92
Agenda Number: PAY 92-04
During the rain storm that hit the metroplex on April 28, the Library roof
leaked in several areas causing interior ceiling and wall damage. Estimates
of $5,200 and $5,285 for repairing the roof were received from Frazier
Roofing Company and Clark Roofing Company.
Frazier Roofing Company which was low bidder, stated they could complete the
project in about 5 days if they started immediately. Due to all the roof
damage in the metroplex, Clark Roofing Company would not obligate themselves
to a start date. To prevent further damage to the building, Frazier Roofing
Company was awarded the project by the City Manager pursuant to emergency
authority granted by the City Charter. The work was completed on schedule.
Funding Source:
Building Services <06-01-02-3020)
$5,200
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council ratify the payment af $5,200 to
Frazier Roofing Company.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
ð¡ k
~~l~
d Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Ktf/LrZ~
City Manager
. Fmance Director
Page 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Public Works
Approve Reimbursement to Lone Star Gas
rnmr~ny fnr Pir~linA Arljll~tmAnt~ on Bursey
Road Improvements - Resolution No. 92-29
Department:
aUbject:
Source of Funds:'
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
e operaU9;9.,:.BUdget
Other '.. ,.,
t· r·
.,' .
,....
..'
I
Council Meeting Date: 6/08/92
Agenda Number: PAY 92-05
Two of Lone Star Gas Company's 4-inch transmission pipelines will need to be lowered and/or
relocated. The pipeline designated C10 crossing Bursey Road west of Douglas Lane will need to be
lowered. The pipeline designated C10-5 which runs in an old dedicated easement parallel to the road
along its south side within the proposed road right-ot-way will need to be relocated in several spots.
These adjustments are due to the roadway widening and street excavation.
Lone Star Gas Company's cost estimate tor the pipeline adjustments is $99, 130.00. Lone Star Gas
Company will require a certified copy of the attached resolution after its approval by Council before it
will proceed wtih the pipeline adjustments.
Fundina Source:
Funds have been allocated to this proposed project from the 1989 and 1991 General Obligation Bond
Sales. The proposed costs to relocate the gas mains should be expensed to the construction
account.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends Council approve Resolution No. 92-29 authorizing the reimbursement of the
relocation costs estimated to be $99,130.
Finance Review
Acct. Number 13-15-89-6000
Sufficient Funds A"ble v
--~ ~~-fT
~ R!¥~
Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
--/'
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
RESOLUTION NO. 92-29
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills will be widening and improving Bursey Road from
Rufe Snow Drive to Kandy Lane and;
WHEREAS, Lone Star Gas Company will have to adjust two 4-inch transmission pipelines to
avoid conflict with this proposed Bursey Road project, and;
WHEREAS, Lone Star Gas Company will require 1000/0 reimbursement from the City for all
costs associated with their adjusting these two pipelines -- estimated to cost $99,130.00;
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas that:
The City of North Richland Hills will reimburse Lone Star Gas Company for the total actual
cost of the adjustment of the two 4-inch transmission pipelines. The reimbursement will be made to
Lone Star Gas Company after completion of the pipeline adjustments and presentation of an invoice
to the City.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 8th day of June, 1992.
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
RIGHT OF WAY DEPARTMENT
214-741-3711
^
,~
lone Star Gas Compan);,
i! ,
301 S. Harwood St. · Dallas, Texas 75201-5696
't'
:,:92
May 8, 1992
I \
f I
¡
,
'------- .,.
Mr. Greg Dickens
Public Works Director
City of North Richland Hills
7301 Northeast Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609
Re: Line CI0-4"/15 & 16
Line C10-5-4"/1-6
Bursey Road Improvements
Tarrant County, Texas
Dear Mr. Dickens:
Enclosed are four (4) copies of estimates and plans for the
relocation of approximately 1541 feet of 4-inch Line C10-5 and 128
linear feet of 4-inch Line CI0; also the abandonment of
approximately 1641 linear feet of existing 4-inch pipe. The
estimated cost for these alterations is $99,130.00. This estimate
is subject to review after 60 days.
Approval of the proposed pipeline route shown on the attached
drawing is necessary prior to the start of construction by Lone
star Gas Company. Approval shall include conf irmation that
existing and proposed features along the proposed pipeline route
are shown completely and correctly.
Proposed and existing features shown, including land usage,
grades, streets, drainage structures, water lines, storm sewers,
etc., along the proposed pipeline route are based on the best
information available to Lone star Gas Company. If the features
shown are incorrect or new information is available, please advise
as soon as possible so plans can be revised accordingly.
Should you wish to proceed with alteration of our facilities
as shown on the attached drawings, please so indicated by
completing the "Project Approval Block" shown in red on the
drawings and return one copy to my attention.
Please furnish this office authorization for reimbursement of
the actual cost incurred on this project. When this authorization
is received, scheduling of the work can proceed.
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Mr. Greg Dickens
May 7, 1992
Page 2
Upon completion of the alteration work, you will be furnished
an itemized invoice as to the actual cost incurred.
If you have any questions concerning our cost estimates and
plans, I will be happy to discuss this matter in greater detail
with you at your convenience.
Sincerely,
~.~
David L. Cromer
Right of Way Agent
DLC:rdg
Enclosures
cc: W. W. Barnett
L. A. Janecka
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
Material
Company Labor
Automotive
Tool & Work Equipment
Contract
Right of Way
Miscellaneous
Overheads
$ 9,100
13,150
8, 130
15,000
33,250
o
8,000
12.000
$98,630
500
$99,130
TOTAL
Gas Loss
GRAND TOTAL