The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1992-07-13 Agendas I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 13, 1992 - 6:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 r~ ortheast Loop 820. ! NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I 1. PW 92-21 Approve Budget for Engineering on Strummer Drive Improvements from Bedford-Euless Road to Grapevine Highway (Agenda Item No. 26) (10 Minutes) 2. IR 92-75 Holiday Lane Alignment Between Bursey Road and Starnes Road (10 Minutes) 3. PZ 92-18 Public Hearing to Consider a Proposed Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding Commercial Parking Lots - Ordinance No. 1815 (Agenda Item No.9) PZ 92-19 Public Hearing to Consider a Proposed Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding Automobile Inspection Stations - Ordinance No. 1816 (Agenda Item No. 10) PZ 92-20 Public Hearing to Consider a Proposed Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding Automobile Lubrication Center/Service Station - Ordinance No. 1817 (Agenda Item No. 11) (10 Minutes 4. PS 92-12 Request of Spring Oaks Development Company for Final Plat of Spring Oaks Addition (Agenda Item No. 13) (5 Minutes) 5. PS 92-16 Request of Northridge II Joint Venture for Corrected Final Plat on Lot lR-l and Lots 27-R through 48-R, Block 4, Northridge II Addition (Agenda Item No. 14) (5 Minutes) 6. PW 92-18 Award of Bid for Miscellaneous 1992 Water/Sewer Line Replacements (Agenda Item No. 23) (5 Minutes) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 ! NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I 7. PW 92-19 Award of Bid for Little Bear Creek Channel Clearing from Precinct Line Road to Northfield Park (Agenda Item No. 24) (5 Minutes) 8. PW 92-20 Award of Bid for Boca Raton Drive Storm Drain Improvements (Agenda Item No. 25) (5 Minutes) 9. PAY 92-07 Approve Final Pay Estimate No.4 of $102,555.21 for Community Center Parking Lot Improvements (Agenda Item No. 28) (5 Minutes) 10. Other Items (5 Minutes) 11. Work Session Reminder - Workshop on Southwestern Bell Franchise July 20, 1992 at 6:00 p.m. 12. *Executive Session (15 Minutes) a. Personnel b. Briefing on Pending Litigation c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition 13. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CI1Y COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 13, 1992 For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/ or action. NUMBER ! ITEM ACTION TAKEN I 1. Call to Order I 2. Invocation I 3. Pledge of Allegiance I 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting June 22, 1992 5. Minutes of the Special Meeting June 29, 1992 6. Presentations by Boards & Commissions None 7. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 8. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, & 28) 9. PZ 92-18 Public Hearing to Consider a Proposed Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding Commercial Parking Lots - Ordinance No. 1815 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 ! NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I 10. PZ 92-19 Public Hearing to Consider a Proposed Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding Automobile Inspection Stations - Ordinance No. 1816 11. PZ 92-20 Public Hearing to Consider a Proposed Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding Automobile Lubrication Center/Service Station - Ordinance No. 1817 12. PZ 92-22 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of ITC Inc. for a Specific Use Permit on Tract 8, Johns Addition for an R V Storage Lot - Ordinance No. 1818 (Located on the east side of Davis Boulevard, south of the railroad tracks) 13. PS 92-12 Request of Spring Oaks Development Company for Final Plat of Spring Oaks Addition (Located north of Cannon Drive and West of Amundson Road) * 14. PS 92-16 Request of Northridge II Joint Venture for Corrected Final Plat on Lot lR-l and Lots 27-R through 48-R, Block 4, Northridge II Addition (Located on Harwood Road, east of Bob Drive) * 15. GN 92-82 Appointment to Beautification Commission * 16. GN 92-83 Appointments to Planning and Zoning Commission * 17. GN 92-84 Appointment to Park and Recreation Board I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. Page 3 ! NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I * 18. GN 92-85 Appointment to the Civil Service Commission - Resolution No. 92-37 I *19. GN 92-86 I Property Tax Refund I I *20. PU 92-21 Additional Library Shelving *21. PU 92-22 Award Bid for Automatic Meter Reading Units *22. PU 92-23 Award Annual Contract for Batteries *23. PW 92-18 Award of Bid for Miscellaneous 1992 Water/Sewer Line Replacements *24. PW 92-19 Award of Bid for Little Bear Creek Channel Clearing from Precinct Line Road to Northfield Park *25. PW 92-20 Award of Bid for Boca Raton Drive Storm Drain Improvements *26. PW 92-21 Approve Budget for Engineering on Strummer Drive Improvements from Bedford-Euless Road to Grapevine Highway *27. PAY 92-06 Approve Reimbursement to Mobil Pipe Line Company for Adjustments on Calloway Branch Channel Improvements, Phase II-b - Resolution No. 92-36 *28. PAY 92-07 Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 4 of $102,555.21 for Community Center Parking Lot Improvements I .. Page 4 I ! ! I I NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN I 29. Citizens Presentation I I 30. Adjournment I I I I I I I I POSTe:D I '7- 9- qð - - Date ~ () I o. () f) /Y"l, Time City Secretary I ¡/7 J)¿A :6(/'f\- ~.1~ I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I INFORMAL REPOATTO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL NO.IR 92-77 ~~ ..c:::::::::: x :::::::::- ~F ¥ July 13, 1992 Date: Subject: Appointment to Budget Advisory Committee Council was previously advised that Councilman Wood had been appointed to the BISD Budget Advisory Committee. Councilman Wood is unable to serve on this committee. Mayor Brown has appointed Mr. Ron Lueck to the committee. Respectfully submitted, 2:::~f~ City Secretary JR:ph - ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL NO·llt 92 7& Date: July 13, 1992 Subject: City Council Review of Municipal Court The Mayor has appointed the following committee to review the needs of the Municipal Court. The committee consists of Mayor Tommy Brown, Councilman Lyle Welch, Councilman Ray Oujesky and Dennis Horvath. The committee will meet in the near future to review the revenues and expenditures of the Municipal Court, personnel status and the future needs of the Court. The committee will report back to the City Council during the budget retreat to be held August 14-16, 1992. Respectfully submitted, o(w City Manager DH/gp ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL NO.IR 92-75 \J^rz ...c::::::: :x ~ 7ìf Date: Ju I y 8, 1992 Subject: Holiday Lane Alignment Between Bursey Road and Starnes Road When the revised Master Plan was adopted on June 22, 1992, the alignment and width of Holiday Lane between Bursey Road and Starnes Road was left unresolved, pending "further study". There are varying opinions regarding this issue concerning whether the staff and/or a consultant is to be performing a study or if the City Council members are performing their own studies. Further, there is some confusion over the status of Holiday Lane. There is one opinion that it does not exist between Bursey and Starnes, and another opinion that it exists in its previously approved location since it was not changed on June 22nd. At present, there is active interest in the development of the land between Starnes an Bursey through which Holiday Lane will pass. City Council guidance is requested so that appropriate action can be taken in the planning process with respect to Holiday Lane. Respectfully submitted, . -1 j·t I ~.... ',//11 --........ , - ~.:. -~. Rodger"" N. Line City Manager RNL/gp _ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS EXECUTIVE SESSION AGENDA JULY 13, 1992 ! -. I I ! NUMBER ITErd ACTION TAKEN Method of Appointment to Boards/Commissions - Councilman Oujesky IR 92-76 Petition Requesting Ordinance No. 1808 be Submitted to Voters IR 92-74 Contract with Laidlaw for Recycling I I. I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I INFORMAL REPOATTO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL NO.IR 92-76 ~t1 c:::::::: :x :::::::> y Date: July 13, 1992 Subject: Petition Requesting Ordinance No. Voters 1808 be Submitted to A petition was received in the City Secretary's office July 7, 1992 requesting that Ordinance No. 1808 (Herman Smith's rezoning) be submitted to the citizens for approval/disapproval. As soon as the signatures are verified the petition will be presented to the Council. Respectfully submitted, ~~.. Jeanette Rewl.s City Secretary JR:ph .. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CI1Y COUNCIL OF THE CI'lY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CI'lY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JUNE 22, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order June 22, 1992, at 7:30 p.m. Present: Tommy Brown Byron Sibbet Mack Garvin Lyle E. Welch Mark Wood Jo Ann Johnson Ray Oujesky Linda Spurlock Staff: Dennis Horvath C.A. Sanford Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Greg Dickens Absent: Rodger N. Line Councilman Welch gave the invocation. ROLL CALL Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer City Manager 2. INVOCATION 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JUNE 8,1992 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve the minutes of the June 8, 1992 City Council Meeting. Motion carried 7-0. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I June 22, 1992 Page 2 5. PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. RECOGNITION OF TEEN COURT VOLUNTEERS Mike Fritz, Teen Court Advisory Board Chairman, presented plaques to the following Teen Court Volunteers in appreciation of their service: Tim Hunter, Tobi Gorbet, Amber Vasquez, Amy Pennington, Brian Yates, Jennifer Mathews, and Amy Walker. B. SPECIAL PRESENTATION BY PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Jim Browne, Parks Director, and Monica Walsh, Recreation Superintendent, presented to the City Council the HCA North Hills Corporate Challenge Traveling Trophy. c. PARKS & RECREATION BOARD MINUTES D. BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION MINUTES E. TEEN COURT MINUTES No action necessary. 6. PRESENTATION OF YARD OF THE MONTH AWARDS FOR JUNE Mayor Brown and Alice Scoma, Beautification Committee Chairman, presented the "Yard of the Month" awards for June to: The Norman Wolf Family, 3856 Diamond Loch West: Mr. and Mrs. Don Stutts~ 7016 Santiago Court: Mr. and Mrs. Gerald Lot1and, 4913 Wondol Court: Mr. and Mrs. Walter Young, 7520 Cimmaron; Mr. and Mrs. Charles Shelton. 7354 Winnel Way; Mr. and Mrs. Robert A. Millican, 7801 Johnson Court; Mr. Rick Malhiot, 7628 Ford: Mr. and Mrs. Perry Christensen, 6529 Victoria. 7. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilwoman Spurlock removed Items No. 11 and 20 from the Consent Agenda. 8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (9, 12, 134t 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21 & 22) APPROVED I , I. I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I- I June 22, 1992 Page 3 Councilman Wood moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. * 9. PZ 91-25 - CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1080 REGARDING THE R-8 ZERO LOT LINE DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. 1795 APPROVED 10. PZ 91-27 - PUBLIC HEARING ON ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE LAND USE AND THOROUGHFARE ELEMENTS OF THE MASTER PLAN FOR THE CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ORDINANCE NO. 1812 APPROVED Mr. LeBaron, Community Development Director, presented the proposed Master Plan. Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. The following citizens appeared requesting Holiday Lane be two lanes instead of four and keep the original proposed route: Mr. Fred Hensley, 7308 Londonderry Drive Ms. Donna Morrow, 7300 Londonderry Drive Mr. Robert Atherton, 7300 Bursey Road. Council advised this was a master plan only. There were no immediate plans for the extension of Holiday Lane. It would probably be seven to ten years or until the owner of the property located at Starnes and Bursey, south of the Londonderry Addition, decided to develop before Holiday Lane would be extended. Mr. Joe McCarthy, 5001 Strummer, appeared before the Council. Mr. McCarthy asked that the land use map be explained. Council responded to Mr. McCarthy's questions. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I June 22, 1992 Page 4 The following citizens spoke on the proposed Master Plan: Ms. Webb, 6800 Meadow - had questions pertaining to the proposed width of Meadow Road. Ms. Penny Patterson, 6812 Meadow - asked how long it would be before any construction was started. Mr. Derek Dequire, 7312 Plumwood - advised they did not want the street coming through their neighborhood and asked that Council consider two lanes instead of four. Ms. Wanda Roberts, 7900 Douglas Lane - asked if Douglas Lane would be straightened out. Council advised it would be straightened out. Mr. Ken Martin, 7416 Bursey Road - asked the Council to consider keeping the Holiday Lane extension as it was originally proposed. Mr. Powell, representing the owners of the property located at Starnes and Bursey _ asked if Holiday Lane was proposed to be two lanes or four lanes. Council advised at the present time four lanes were proposed. Mr. Gerald Pederson., 6802 Meadow Road - asked how much notice the owners would receive before the City decided to cut the street through. Staff advised they would be given ample notice. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Garvin moved. seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet. to approve the current \laster Plan., further study on designated width of Holiday Lane to be done at time of platting. \1otion carried 7-0. 11. GN 92-74 - CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ADOPT THE 1991 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE ORDINANCE NO. 1813 APPROVED Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve Ordinance No. 1813.. filing fee to be $50.00 on an appeal case. I Ie I I I I I I I f' I I I I I I -- I I June 22, 1992 Page 5 Motion carried 7-0. *12. GN 92-75 - CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ADOPT THE 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE ORDINANCE NO. 1814 APPROVED *13. GN 92-76 - LEITER OF AGREEMENT TO BILL AND COLLECT WATAUGA'S DRAINAGE UTILI1Y FEES APPROVED *14. GN 92-77 - APPOINTMENT TO BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION APPROVED *15. GN 92-78 - AUTHORIZE EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS ON BEDFORD-EULESS ROAD PROJECT RESOLUTION NO. 92-33 APPROVED *16. GN 92-79 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRADE OF REAL PROPERlY FOR THE BEDFORD-EULESS ROAD PROJECT RESOLUTION NO. 92-35 APPROVED 17. GN 92-80 - PARKS AND RECREATION SALES TAX ORDINANCE NO. 1811 APPROVED Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to approve Ordinance No. 1811 with the deletion of amphitheaters. Motion carried 7-0. I' , Ie I I I I 1 I I f' I 1 I I 1 I ~ I I June 22, 1992 Page 6 *18. PU 92-18 - APPROVE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERlY FOR BEDFORD-EULESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT _ ONE RIGHT-OF-WAY STRIP TAKING TO BE PURCHASED AT OR NEAR THE APPRAISED VALUE RESOLUTION NO. 92-32 APPROVED *19. PU 92-19 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERlY FOR BEDFORD-EULESS ROAD PROJECf. THREE TRACfS TO BE PURCHASED AT THE APPRAISED VALUE RESOLUTION NO. 92-34 APPROVED 20. PU 92-20 - REJECT BID FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLERS DENIED Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to deny PU 92-20. Ms. Gail Seals spoke against the denial. Motion to deny carried 7-0. *21. PW 92-16 APPROV~ BUDGET FOR L.S. 377 UTILITY RELOCATION IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II APPROVED *22. PW 92-17 - AWARD OF BID FOR RICHLAND PLAZA DRIVE AND LAKE SIDE CIRCLE SEAL COAT IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED 23. CITIZENS PRESENTATION MR. MIKE STEWARD - 5009 ROBERTA _ AMENDMENT OF CODE REGARDING FRONT YARD STORAGE 4 Ie I I I I I I I I" I I I I I I Ie I I ._~ - ---....---- June 22, 1992 Page 7 Mr. Steward was not present. Mr. Joe McCarthy, 5001 Strummer, cited several changes he would like for the Council to make pertaining to the conducting of City Council meetings. Mr. McCarthy also stated that when the Strummer issue was before the Council 120 people had asked for a postponement and the Council did not consider their request. Attorney McEntire advised the Council an official vote needed to be taken on Item No. 22 to award the bid. Councilwoman Johnson moved, seconded by Councilman Oujesky, to accept the bid of Hi-Tech in the amount of $19,755. Motion carried 7-0. 24. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 7-0. Tommy Brown - Mayor A.\ TIEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I ile I II MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CIlY COUNCIL OF THE CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CIlY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JUNE 29, 1992 - 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet called the meeting to order June 29, 1992, at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Byron Sibbet Mack Garvin Lyle E. Welch Mark Wood Ray Oujesky Linda Spurlock Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Staff: Rodger N. Line C.A. Sanford Rex McEntire Kane Kelly Betty Sorrels City Manager Assistant City Manager Attorney MIS Director Secretary MIS Others Present: E.O. Jackson George Angle John Lacy Lynn Darnold Citicable Board Chairman Citicable Board Vice Chairman Citicable Board Citicable Board Absent: Tommy Brown Jo Ann Johnson Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Mayor Councilwoman Deputy City Manager City Secretary GN 92-81 PUBLIC HEARING FOR FRANCHISE RENEWAL FOR CIlY CABLE 36 Mayor Pro Tern Byron Sibbet opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Kane Kelly, MIS Director, presented the Council with the reasons for the public hearing related to extending the cable franchise. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I June 29, 1992 Page 2 Mr. Tom SouIsby, General ~y1anager of Sammons Communications, showed a video and slides explaiiling the company!s future growth plans for the citizens of North Richland Hills. The Mayor Pro Tern asked for questions and input from the audience. Since there were not any questions, the Mayor Pro Tern closed the Public Hearing. ADJOURNMENT TO EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet adjourned the meeting to Executive Session. BACK TO ORDER Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet called the meeting back to order with the same Council members present as recorded. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Oujesky moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. Byron Sibbet - Mayor Pro Tern A TrEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Community Development Council Meeting Date: 7/13/92 Subject: Public Hearing to consider a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinaut,;e reyärdi.IY Commercial Parking Lots. Agenda Number: PZ-92-18 Ordinance # 1815 Attached is proposed ordinance number 1815 which will amend the Zoning Ordinance to insert "Commercial Parking Lot- as a new use. The current zoning regulations do not provide for any place where recreational vehicles may be stored between uses. The City has been approached by a developer to install such a facility where spaces can be leased on a monthly basis to store boats, camping trailers and motor homes. The proposed ordinance provides for such a use in the 1-1 and 1-2 districts by right. A commercial parking lot would also be allowed in the OC Outdoor Commercial and C-2 Commercial districts with Specific Use Permit approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this proposed zoning ordinance amendment at their June 25, 1992 meeting and has submitted a favorable recommendation. There were no adverse comments received regarding this proposed zoning ordinance change. RECOMMENDA TION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available K~/)1~~ City Manager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1815 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCB 1080, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCB, REGARDING COMMERCIAL PARKING LOT IN THE C-2 COMMERCIAL, oc OUTDOOR COMMERCIAL, 1-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND 1-2 MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planninq and Zoninq Commission of the City of North Richland Hills has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1080, the Comprehensive Zoninq Ordinance, by chanqinq the said ordinance as set forth herein. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, the regulations in the C-2 Commercial District, Section 14.2A PERMITTED USES BY SPECIFIC USE PERMIT be hereby amended to add the following: 14.2A.15 Commercial Parking Lot 2. THAT, the regulations in the OC Outdoor Commercial District, Section 15.2A PERMITTED USES BY SPECIFIC USE PERMIT be hereby amended to add the following: 15.2A.l1 Commercial Parking Lot 3. THAT, the regulations in the 1-1 Light Industrial District, Section 16.2 PERMITTED USES be hereby amended to add the following: 16.2.74 Commercial Parking Lot 4. THAT, the regulations in the 1-2 Medium Industrial District, Section 17.2 PERMITTED USES be hereby amended to add the following: 17.2.79 Commercial Parking Lot I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I 2 5. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 6. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance 1080, The Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 25 DAY OF JUNE 1992. ~~ l:tiA.l~ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION &æ~ PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 1992. DAY OF MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY I' Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I II I I 3. PZ 92-18 Mr. LeBaron stated that in looking a most cities used those dimensi Vice-Chairman Barfiel ated the angle of the street intersection, whet the street is above or below the grade vertical height of the triangle may need to be eBaron stated the closest thing that staff could come up ith was to use the average grade of the existing curb. Mr. Lueck stated that maybe a concept like a sight pyramid would be ideal since it allows for the third dimension. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked for those wishing to speak to come forward. There being none, Vice-Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Moody made the motion to table PZ 92-17 until the next meeting in order for staff to look at the changes and study it some more. Mr. Bowen seconded the motion, and the motion carried 5-0 Public Hearing for the consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding Commercial Parking Lots. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked Mr. LeBaron to explain the ordinance. Mr. LeBaron stated that staff has done some research on commercial parking lots, and is recommending that they be added as an allowed use in the light and medium industrial districts, and allowed by a specific use permit in outdoor commercial and C-2 commercial. Mr. Lueck stated that they may want to allow more than just recreational vehicles to be stored. Vice-Chairman Barfield stated that this would be primarily for storage of boats. trailers. and campers, but it is not limited to those. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. There being none, Vice-Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. Vice-Chairman Barfield stated the fire department may require a paved fire lane. He asked when that requirement would be picked up. I' Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I PZ Minutes - 25 June 92 Page 4 3. PZ 92-19 Mr. LeBa ion stated that the Building Official and the Fire Department would look at that issue. He stated it did not necessarily have to state that in the ordinance. Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve PZ 92-18. Mr. Bowen seconded the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. Public Hearing for the consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding Automobile Inspection Stations. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked Mr. LeBaron to explai ordinance. Mr. LeBaron stated this is another use that i ot listed in the ordinance. He stated that there are sever inspection stations in the City, but they are usuall n accessory use. Mr. LeBaron stated that occasionall ere is one that is a stand alone facility. He stated th after Staff research, that automobile inspection stations e allowed as a permitted use in the light and medium ind rial and C-2 commercial districts, and in the C-1 d· rlct by specific use permit. Mr. LeBaron stated that th ordinance includes a definition to make it clear that n epair could take place. Vice-Chairman arfield asked for those wishing to speak to come forwa . There being none, Vice-Chairman Barfield closed t ublic Hearing. Mr. eck stated his concern over unfair business practices b nspection stations, according to news articles. He asked r. LeBaron what recourse is available if it turns out that the stations are price gouging. Mr. LeBaron stated that the use could be deleted from the ordinance, or that the information could be given to state agencies that regulate consumer fraud. Mr. Lueck asked if it were deleted from the ordinance, the use would be ugrandfathered. II Mr. LeBaron stated that is correct. Mr. Lueck stated he just wanted to make it a matter of record. Mr. Bowen stated that he agreed with Mr. Lueck, but that the use needs to be there to have some regulation over it. I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Community Development Council Meeting Date: 7/13/92 Subject: Public Hearing to consider an amendment 10 Ihe Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding Automobile Inspection Stations. Agenda Number: PZ-92-19 I I I I I I Ordinance # 1816 Attached is proposed ordinance number 1816 which will amend the Zoning Ordinance to insert a new use for "Automobile Inspection Stations". Currently there is only one location where a facility exists that only provides auto inspection services in the city. Most other inspection facilities in the city are accessory uses associated with a related and existing primary use. This facility is AAA State Inspection located at 5900 Rufe Snow Dr. #315. It is currently zoned 1-2. The attached ordinance provides for Automobile Inspection Stations in the C-2, 1-1 and 1-2 zoning districts. An Automobile Inspection Station will also be allowed in the C-1 zoning district with approval of a Specific Use Permit. Also included in the ordinance is a new definition for Automobile Inspection Stations, which limits the possible repair of automobiles to the replacement of items associated with automobile inspections such as windshield wiper blades and headlamps. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this amendment at their meeting on June 25, 1992 and have submitted a favorable recommendation. There were no adverse comments received regarding this proposed change to the Zoning Ordinance. RECOMMENDA TION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. I ~ I Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ ~~ B:~~ UQ ¡III/~~~ DesJ.f;!ent Head Signature Ci~ Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . FInance Director Page 1 of I I {' I I I I I I 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1816 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OP NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE 1080, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, REGARDING AUTOMOBILE INSPECTION STATIONS IN THB C-l COMMERCIAL, C-2 COMMERCIAL, 1-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND I-2 MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS; ADDING AUTOMOBILE INSPECTION STATION TO THE LIST 01' DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planninq and Zoninq Commission of the City of North Richland Hills has forwarded a recommendation to the city Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1080, the comprehensive Zoninq ordinance, by chanqinq the said ordinance as set forth herein. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, the regulations in the C-l Commercial District, Section 13.2A PERMITTED USES BY SPECIFIC USE PERMIT be hereby amended to add the following: 1IIÞ1302Ao13 Automobile Inspection station I I I I I I I 2. THAT, the regulations in the C-2 Commercial District, Section 14.2 PERMITTED USES be hereby amended to add the following: 14.2.58 Automobile Inspection station 3. THAT, the regulations in the 1-1 Light Industrial District, Section 16.2 PERMITTED USES be hereby amended to add the following: 16.2.73 Automobile Inspection Station 4. THAT, the regulations in the 1-2 Medium Industrial District, section 17.2 PERMITTED USES be hereby amended to add the following: 17.2.79 Automobile Inspection station 5. , THAT, Section III, DEFINITIONS be hereby amended to add the following definition: AUTOMOBILE INSPECTION STATION - A facility which performs inspections of I and affixes inspection stickers to vehicles for compliance with applicable I I 2 state Motor Vehicle Inspection Laws. No repairs are performed other than __ the minor replacement of items associated with the automobile inspection 1_ process. 6. I I I I I I SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 7. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance 1080, The Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and II after i ts passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE 1992. I I I I I I I ~l-.-~~', ~ C .l.t<M.AN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~tf~ PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF , 1992. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY '" ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY I I' I ~ I I I I I I II I I I I I I I , I rz MiRHt99 ~i IUnð Q~ Page 4 Mr. LeB ed that the Building Official and the P"ire rtment would look at that issue. He st~ted it did not necessarily have to state that in the ordinance. Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve PZ 92-18. Mr. Bowen seconded the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. 3. PZ 92-19 Public Hearing for the consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding Automobile Inspection Stations. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked Mr. LeBaron to explain the ordinance. Mr. LeBaron stated this is another use that is not listed in the ordinance. He stated that there are several inspection stations in the City, but they are usually an accessory use. Mr. LeBaron stated that occasionally there is one that is a stand alone facility. He stated that after Staff research, that automobile inspection stations be allowed as a permitted use in the light and medium industrial and C-2 commercial districts, and in the C-1 district by specific use permit. Mr. LeBaron stated that the ordinance includes a definition to make it clear that no repair could take place. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked for those wishing to speak to come forward. There being none, Vice-Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Lueck stated his concern over unfair business practices by inspection stations, according to news articles. He asked Mr. LeBaron what recourse is available if it turns out that the stations are price gouging. Mr. LeBaron stated that the use could be deleted from the ordinance, or that the information could be given to state agencies that regulate consumer fraud. Mr. Lueck asked if it were deleted from the ordinance, the use would be "grandfathered." Mr. LeBaron stated that is correct. Mr. Lueck stated he just wanted to make it a matter of record. Mr. Bowen stated that he agreed with Mr. Lueck, but that the use needs to be there to have some regulation over it. I I " I I I I I I II I I I !I I I I ~ I PZ Minutes - 25 June 92 Page 5 5. PZ 92-20 6. PZ 92-21 Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 92-19. The motion was seconded by Mr. Moody, and the motion carried 5-0. Public Hearing for the consideration of an amendment to th Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding Automobile Lubricati Centers. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked Mr. LeBaron to expl ordinance. Mr. LeBaron stated that during the pre-se · n, it was discussed that auto servicing and auto I rication centers could be combined due to their similar. unctions. Mr. LeBaron stated that the combination ould clarify any misunderstanding between the tw sese Mr. LeBaron stated that they be allowed by right in e C-2, 1-1, and 1-2 districts, and by specific use permit in e C-1 district. He stated that the definition be changed t ombine the two uses. Vice-Chairman Barfield ked for those wishing to speak to come forward. Ther eing none, Vice-Chairman Barfield closed the Public aring. Mr. Lueck ma the motion to approve PZ 92-20 with the erated by Mr. LeBaron. Mr. Le ron stated this would include changing the definition mobile lubrication center/service station, and delete th efinition auto servicing, and the rest of the ordinance ould be as written. Mr. Moody seconded the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked that since automobile servicing was deleted, that does not mean that a service station cannot do servicing. Mr. LeBaron stated that the language for automobile lubrication center was the same as auto servicing, but auto servicing was never mentioned in the list of permitted uses. He stated that is was necessary to exchange the words. Public Hearing for the consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance # 1080 regarding extra width on corner lots. Vice-Chairman Barfield stated the reason for this ordinance is that the lot widths In R-2 and R-3 don't allow enough room on CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Community Development 7/13/92 - Council Meeting Date: Subject: Public Hearing to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance II t 080 regarding Automobile Lubrication Center/Service Station. Agenda Number: PZ-92-20 I I I I I I -- II I - Ordinance # 1817 Attached is proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to insert II Automobile Lubrication Centerll as a new use in the list of permitted uses. At the June 25th meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, it was their recommendation to incorporate the zoning regulations which pertain to traditional Automobile Service Stations with the new regulations for Automobile Lubrication Centers. It was their consensus that these two land uses perform virtually identical services, except for the sale of motor fuels at traditional service stations. However in recent years, the number of traditional service stations has diminished due to the growth of the self service fuel industry at many "convenience storesN. The l'Automobile Lubrication CenterH is a relatively new land use in the city and there are currently four of these facilities operating in North Richland Hills and they are listed as follows: &ME ADDRESS CURRENT ZONING C-1 C-2 C-2 1-2 Jiffy Lube Minit Lube Jiffy Lube Minit Lube 7343 Grapevine Highway @Turner Dr. 7505 Grapevine Highway @ Ken Micheal 5028 Davis Blvd. @ Maplewood 5749 Rute Snow @Industrial Park The attached ordinance provides for Automobile Lubrication Centers in the C-2, 1-1 and 1-2 zoning districts by right. They will also be allowed in the C-1 zoning district with Specific Use Permit approval. Since there is always a concern that lubrication centers and service stations may evolve into automobile repair facilities, the definition of Automobile Lubrication Center has been incorporated with that of a Service Station. The definition in the zoning ordinance for IIAuto Servicingll will be deleted by this amendment because it is no longer needed. RECOMMENDA TION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. /' Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) gµ;;ting BUdget) ': ' ' C C"I..~ 1<j3Ga~ ~ ~ R ØA _ ~ Detfartment Head Signature ~nager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable . Finance Director Page 1 of I I f I I I I I I II I I I I I I I " I 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE 1080, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, REGARDING AUTOMOBILE LUBRICATION CENTERS AND SERVICE STATIONS IN THE C-l COMMERCIAL, C-2 COMMERCIAL, 1-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, AND 1-2 MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS; ADDING AUTOMOBILE LUBRICATION CENTER/SERVICE STATION TO THE LIST OF DEFINITIONS; DELETING AUTO SERVICING FROM THE LIST OF DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of North Richland Hills has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendment of Ordinance No. 1080, the Comprehensive Zoning ordinance, þy changing the said ordinance as set forth herein. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: 1. THAT, the regulations in the C-l Commercial District, Section 13.2A PERMITTED USES BY SPECIFIC USE PERMIT be hereby amended to read as follows: 13.2A.7 Automobile Lubrication Center or Service station 2. THAT, the regulations in the C-2 Commercial District, section 14.2 PERMITTED USES be hereby amended to read as follows: 14.2.24 Automobile Lubrication Center or Service station 3. THAT, the regulations in the 1-1 Light Industrial District, Section 16.2 PERMITTED USES be hereby amended to read as follows: 16.2.28 Automobile Lubrication Center or Service station 4. THAT, the regulations in the 1-2 Medium Industrial District, Section 17.2 PERMITTED USES be hereby amended to read as follows: I I f I I I I I I II I I I I I I I ~ I 2 17.2.32 Automobile Lubrication Center or Service Station 5. THAT, Section III, DEFINITIONS be hereby amended to delete the following definition: AUTO SERVICING 6. THAT, Section III, DEFINITIONS be hereby amended to add the following definition: AUTOMOBILE LUBRICATION CENTER OR SERVICE STATION (not including repair) - Facilities which perform retail sales of motor fuels and perform routine servicing of motor'vehicles, including the replacement of elements and fluids which are expected to be routinely replaced on a frequent basis such as engine oils, lubrications, brake fluids, transmission and power steering fluids, and air filters. 7. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the ci ty Council wi thout the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. 8. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance 1080, The Zoning Ordinance of the city of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. I I f I I I I I I II I I I I I I I " I 3 9. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 1992. DAY OF :1=~~~ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~¿~ PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 1992. DAY OF MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY I' I f I I I I I I II I I I I I I I ~ ~ PZ Minutes - 25 June 92 Page 5 Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 92-19. The motiO!1 was seconded by Mr. Moody, and the motion carried 5-0. ~ 5. PZ 92-20 Public Hearing for the consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding Automobile Lubrication Centers. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked Mr. LeBaron to explain the ordinance. Mr. LeBaron stated that during the pre-session, it was discussed that auto servicing and auto lubrication centers could be combined due to their similar functions. Mr. LeBaron stated that the combination would clarify any misunderstanding between the two uses. Mr. LeBaron stated that they be allowed by right in the C-2, 1-1 J and 1-2 districts, and by specific use permit in the C-1 district. He stated that the definition be changed to combine the two uses. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked for those wishing to speak to come forward. There being none, Vice-Chairman Barfield closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve PZ 92-20 with the changes enumerated by Mr. LeBaron. Mr. LeBaron stated this would include changing the definition to automobile lubrication center/service station, and delete the definition auto servicing, and the rest of the ordinance would be as written. Mr. Moody seconded the motion, and the motion carried 5-0. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked that since automobile servicing was deleted, that does not mean that a service station cannot do servicing. Mr. LeBaron stated that the language for automobile lubrication center was the same as auto servicing, but auto servicing was never mentioned in the list of permitted uses. He stated that is was necessary to exchange the words. 6. PZ 92-21 Public Hearing for the consideration of an amen Zoning Ordinance # 1080 regarding extra width 0 lots. Vice- arfield stated the reason for this ordinance is at the lot widths in R-2 and R-3 don't allow enough room on I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Community Development 7/13/92 Council Meeting Date: Subject: Department: PZ-92-22 I I I I -. ~ ~ , Public Hearing to consider the request of II C Inc. for a SpecifIC Use Permit on Tract 8, Johns Addition, for an RV Storage Lot. This property is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard, just south of the railroad tracts. Agenda Number: Ordinance # 1818 Attached is proposed ordinance number 1818 which has been prepared to consider a request for a Specific Use Permit for an RV Storage Lot on a three acre tract of land on Davis Boulevard. The property under consideration is currently zoned C-2 Commercial. The owners are proposing to rent spaces for recreational vehicles. The site is vacant except for two older metal buildings located toward the rear of the property. These two metal buildings have been vacant for more than six months and are declared Ilnon-conformingll structures. The owners have been advised that they will have to brick the two buildings prior to being issued a Certificate of Occupancy in order to comply with the masonry requirements contained in the Zoning Ordinance. The owners have applied to the Board of Adjustment for a variance from the masonry requirement. The variance case will be heard by the Board of Adjustment at their meeting scheduled for July 16, 1992 Current land use trends show areas similar to this one support some type of heavy commercial use; the land is unsuitable for residential development. The uses surrounding the property are industrial in nature: Bates Container, Precision Packaging Corporation, and further south, Rent-all Land. The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Master Plan for the City of North Richland Hills. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at their June 25, 1992 meeting and have submitted a favorable recommendation. There were no adverse comments received regarding this request. RECOMMENDA TION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available - ..., ~ f:¿II1¿~~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director Page 1 of I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I it I ORDINANCE NO. 1818 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINA~JCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984. AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOllOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HilLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case Number PZ 92-22 the following property shall be rezoned from C-2 to C-2 Specific Use Permit for an RV Storage Lot. BEING Tract 8, Johns Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-79, Page 32, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard, immediately south of the railroad tracks. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 25th DAY OF JUNE, 1992. ~~~ Vice-Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Planning and Zoning Commission BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ 92-22 IS HEREBY REZONED C-2 SUP THIS 13th DAY OF JULY, 1992. Mayor Tommy Brown City of North Richland Hills ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary City of North Richland Hills APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I I ~ I I I I I I II I I I I I I L I tt I PZ Minutes - 25 June 92 Page 6 . / v/ / 7. PZ 92-22 corner lots to build a house after all t setback requirements are satisfied. He asked Mr. LeBaro 0 explain the ordinance. Mr. LeBaron stated that the 7 cot width in R-2 would remain in an interior lot, but on the orner the width would be 80 feet. He stated that in R- ,the 65 foot interior lot width would remain, but the rner lots would go to 79 feet. Vice-Chairman B leld asked for those wishing to speak to come forward. here being none, Vice-Chairman Barfield closed the ~ lie Hearing. n asked how the 79 foot width came about. Vi -Chairman Barfield stated that the 79 feet would give the ildlng area about a 50 foot width. Mr. LeBaron stated that 75 foot would be adequate, but that 79 feet would mathematically give the same amount of buildable area as an interior lot. Vice-Chairman Barfield stated that at the work session, the R- 1 width has no problems, and the Commission may want to consider removing it from the recommendation. Mr. LeBaron stated that the same could be done for the R-1-S district. Vice-Chairman Barfield stated that the ordinance is too complicated to push forward at this time, and that it could be reworded and submitted at the next meeting. Mr. Bowen stated that language may need to be added to allow some type of relief from the ordinance, rather than it being a hard and fast rule. Vice-Chairman Barfield stated that certain situations may cause a developer to lose a lot, which could make or break a subdivision, and that it might be good to be flexible in certain situations. Mr. Bowen made the motion to table PZ 92-21. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck, and the motion carried 5-0. Public Hearing to consider the request of lTC, Inc. for a Specific Use Permit on Tract a, Johns Addition, to allow an RV Storage Lot. Vice-Chairman Barfield opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to come forward. I I tt I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I " I PZ Minutes - 25 June 92 Page 7 Mr. Steve Harriman, representing lTC, Inc., 8216 Northeast Parkway. came forward to speak. He stated the property currently has two existing buildings. He stated the owners do not feel it is being used to its highest and best use. Mr. Harriman stated that a storage facility for AV's is an appropriate use for the site, and that it is in need in the City. He stated an upgrade of the grounds is needed, including improvements and fencing. He stated a sliding security gate that requires a key would be installed. He stated a facility of this type could keep many RV's from being stored in the street or in yards. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked that since the lot would be used for storage, there would be no need for more than one dump station or water filling station, and separate facilities for each trailer would not be needed. Mr. Harriman stated yes. Vice-Chairman Barfield stated that individual electric facilities for each trailer might be required. He stated that it is possible that the Fire Department may require some sort of pave fire lane. Mr. Harriman stated that a paved fire lane would be considered if economically feasible. Mr. Bowen asked if these lot store anything other than RV'S, such as campers and autos. Mr. Harriman stated mostly AV's. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked for anyone else wishing to speak to come forward. There being none, the Public Hearing was closed. Mr. Bowen stated it appears to be an appropriate use given the surrounding uses. Mr. Lueck stated it would be an additional benefit to get some of these vehicles off the streets and yards. Vice-Chairman Barfield asked how the City can regulate the property to keep it from becoming a trailer park. Mr. LeBaron stated that would change the use, which is a call made by the Building Official. Mr. Moody made the motion to approve PZ 92-22. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen, and the motion carried 5-0. I I ~ I I I I I I II I I I I I I I ~ I FACT SHEET Case No. PZ 92-22 Hearing Dates: PZ 6/25/92 CC 7 /27 /92 REQUEST: Specific Use Permit for RV Storage Lot APPLICANT: Mike Colgan, Cameo Development, for ITC Inc. PROPERTY OWNER: ITC Inc. SIZE AND LOCATION: Approximately 3 acres located on the east side of Davis Boulevard, immediately south of the railroad tracks. PROPOSED USE: RV Storage Lot SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Lot slopes downward from the frontage along Davis Boulevard and turns relatively flat. Three metal buildings exist on the lot. North end of the lot is mostly trees. ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE: North: South: East: West: 1-2/vacant C-2/Precision Packaging Corporation AG/vacant 1-2jBates Container DRAINAGE: According to FEMA maps, this property does not lie in the flood plain. THOROUGHFARE PLAN: Access to this property is from Davis Boulevard, designated as a P6D Principal Arterial, 6-lane, divided thoroughfare. LAND USE PLAN: The proposed Land Use Master Plan recommends commercial uses in this area. I I f I I I I I I II I I I I I I I , I ZONING HISTORY: PZ 91-11 PZ 90-17 Request of cabinet shop on Tract 7, Johns Addition,(south of the property under consideration) for a change from C-2 to 1-2. The request was withdrawn. Request of Parker Stone Company on Tract 8, Johns Addition, the property under consideration, to change from C-2 to 1-2. The request was withdrawn, as the applicant terminated the contract to purchase the land. PLATTING HISTORY: PS 72-13 Request for Final Plat of Tract 8, Johns Addition. The plat was approved. '--" ~~ <r::1' êl J ..., lC ~ LC1 I ,.., 0) 0 .... . ~ ~ .... .... (I .... I- - ~ LLl :J ~a 31't91S3M 31V91~ , iTl 0 ~a :rJ lC (J) C'd ....... .:IJ I W (\J I ~ I 0 _ ---:..- io- ~ ~ II) or1 m f'- to It) ~ (T) :"Ti (T') ~ ~ ~ T. ~ Uì '- ø ~ -::J 0 ~TO CD C1:. ill (1) (\J :ìJ ....u I' CDct en C1:. \ C\J 0 -::J<1- ex: ¿LJ\n )-CD 11l <t '"" 0 C"\J r--.. u a ~u - ... CD4 I- u .... U N tJ c.J I- 'S-' <{ a: N C\J I -'" a: ~ ~ ~a: I- a: ex: lI('\J to- ~ I- - _. -- -- --~-~ .. ª lC u. ..... (T) ~~ ~ c:: U)..J l- I .ceLl:.. u ~ X I- <{ &lJJù4 a: CD t-t-2 l- e.. I 0 I-C ~ cna a: 3 C\J c CìJ C c. JI8 ><\ SI^Va (\J C"1 ~ ~ CD or"1 ~ ~ :r: :r: I l- I- tiL \ \ to ~ ~u \~u (1)« c or-1(T) ... \~~ I a:.... C\J ~(T) I-UJ 01 \ . U \ N l...a t:i3aINS tO~ \\ J a: ....CI) (f) I ~ u a:~ ,\ t- I.f) t-~ \ ' \ a: IJJ J( , ~ (11 UJ (11 \ U a: \ t- C\J \ \ rn « Ln \ ¡I£ a: ~ " a \ CD \ I <t <{ u CD\-t\ <{ C\J :1 C\J " .... ft ,...... c: ~ ... ft Z (T') Ln I- CD ~ ..... lD C\J .:( C\J % I I tt ~ to N I , N N I I I () ::::I '" (') 1"1 0 t-' 0 " 0 E 0 0 ~ U'I ~ t'J V"I (') I ~ c.. (J) 0 (1) rT t-' 9 :! '1 ~ ~ -.D ~ ;! '1 ::::: 0 (1) a ~ 0' ~ r-' H\ M 1"1 ~ - 0 rn Z '1) .:=; ñ p. n c '1) (J ..... õ 3 (.¡ [T1 tT1 -.D M ..... rT tY1 =' M 'n :) (/ n Z rT Z j) :;' Z tlJ 0 ~ co co rn U'I =' N ro CD -.D 0 'J' Q. tlJ 0 '0 ':) ::j t'T1 '. U, :"'" ~ " : .~, -.J '.1 ..- Ù ;-. '1 5 ') ;.¿ 0 .> ...... "'j ....J '1 : 'JJ ~ rn 'J J .~ OJ '-' ~. íU C) ..... ~"Q . . - f') rT - '1 '1 i1) - - 'J ro ' - " (l) ,... ~, ... , ~ ':) ::J 'J -. - " ~J ,") ~ ...., .- ~ ...: '/1 " ~J -. 0 ,.) J ....J ,~ ::J (r) '1 ........ '0 ~ ~ I I II I I I I < i ~ z 0 ï ï C :Ð Z C- 3: Þ Ci) 0 rT1 Z :t: -t zZ -4 VA 000 :::u (") :::u þ CD 0 -41> () CD c: :1:0 -t ..:... ~ :::u2 (þ -< r:;-t CD I I I " I ~ ~ ~J1 M\ 5 rt T <J ,'t) Þ r; G') ,j ~ tø r"1 ,~ ~ l t1 ~ ~ C'J ;; rT H ,..., M\ ;¿ ~ cJ "1 Z CJ r" 0 ~ - =3 Ç) ~ 'J) ~ ~ èJ -!2 -:: ~ :::: ~ ::u - ..: _. ~ :., ...: ~ ;.... ~ rJ ,. '0 :' ~ - () r ~ ~- ~- r.' -1 -1 ., ..:: j', '. "\) .:)~ . . , - ,... , ~ ""0 - j (PLA Z046120uw) ACTUAl N02.47~9"E " ~ , )1 rTI (j') s -f ..:: ~ (J1 1'., ex.> o n GJ ~ r. :Þ ( -i C 1>, r Z CDI ~ o ~ ~- ~ N' ~- 1 en N :"" 00" 00'1 p I :~, ~ \ \ \ í ~ - l' I -~ \ I : \ -1--- -1 ; ----t-----.f I ! ,. ---.! . ~ ~ :..--+------ ~ 1 : ~ r ~ o fTI ...L.. ~t '10 :~ ~i . ~ :~t : ! ¡. /' '0 o J' C$I ~ ~~ J' ,>. ~-t- ~\(~ · øtO ð'o\ ~ "to (' ~~1b ~ ~~ ,~O¡ ~.:( 1i~ "., ð'! \ O~ "'}? ~ ·0 '. ~.J Þ -t c: ~ "i. ~ en (J) <D o N ~ ~ <D =-0 (TIr ~ (11 9z (11 CD to<D o o 001_ ~ CJ1 ~- ~ o ~ þ Þ ~ì , T1 ~ 9 -.¡ -.¡ .\ I 24$'-'1, ~, , en CD <D o (J1 <.Q. ~ <D;;:; =:0 rrt ~. :;:j ~;\ i\ ! \ ! \ ú4 CD 9 ~ -.J "~ ,", fi. 22. 70' ( ...-4L ~ ;¡; ::~- -- -=-·~UrJUry ES:T~'~LT3:3- p~ ~3~ ~- -- - - ---.-----::::- . . ) 4 . (PLAT N00Q4150"E 215.1') ACTUAL SOooOO'IS'W ~I I: ..' Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget OtheB /;B I~ ~ Depa~ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I I I I I ~ ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Community Development Council Meeting Date: 7/13/92 Subject: Request of Spring Oaks Development Company tor Final Plat of Spring Oaks Addition. This property is located north of Cannon Drive and west of Amundson Road. Agenda Number: PS 92-12 Spring Oaks Development Company has submitted a Final Plat for an 88 lot subdivision located immediately south of the Sunny Meadows Addition. The property contains two zoning district classifications. The northern 300 foot strip is currently zoned R-3 and the balance of the property zoned R-3 1550. The owners were instructed by the City Council earlier this year to submit a zoning change application for R-3 1550 on the 300 foot strip. The zoning application was scheduled to be heard at the July 9th meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Final Plat incorporates an adjustment to the northeastern portion of the subdivision to accommodate the future alignment of Amundson Road. During the time between the submittal of the Preliminary Plat and the Final Plat, the Council adopted the new regulations for masonry screening walls on new subdivisions. The owner is requesting a waiver of the masonry screening wall requirements. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved this Final Plat with the following comments: 1 . Approval subject to engineering comments. 2. The Council consider a waiver of the masonry screening wall requirement and allow an alternate type of fence construction. 3. Improved visibility triangle at the intersection of Amundson Road and Cannon Drive. RECOMMENDA TION: It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡efl~ City Manager . Finance Director Page 1 of I I ~ I I I I I I II I I I .¿r I I I I , I 2. PS 92-12 2 ./ d/~ Mr. Hagan stated he understands that the constru will have to be reviewed by the city Staff and w' meet all their requirements. Mr. Collins stated that this will just flat Issue to a specific department so they can look at the i ranee risk. He stated his reservations about the slat wid of the fence. Mr. Hagan stated the slats a Mr. Collins stated he u erstands that on the other side of the fence, it is a str t drop to the water. Mr. Miller ated that decorative fences like this one are usuall arrower at the bottom. He stated that a taller fence wo need to be stronger. r. Collins stated that the concerns can be settled if Mr. Hagan would agree to a minimum six-foot fence height overall, including wall and fence, and let the risk management department look at it. Mr. Hagan stated he is agreeable to that. Mr. Bowen stated that the Commission likes this plan, but it is not in compliance with the current thoroughfare plan. He stated the intention tonight is to table the plat until the Council approves the change. Mr. Bowen stated he is uncomfortable in approval subject to future Council action. Mr. Collins made the motion to table PS 92-11 until the June 25th meeting. Mr. Lueck seconded the motion, and the motion carried 6-0. Request of Alpine Development for Final Plat of Spring Oaks Addition. This property is located north of Cannon Drive and west of Amundson Road. Terry Mitchell, with Carter & Burgess Engineers, came forward to speak. He stated he had received and reviewed the staff and engineering comments and has agreed to take care of them as requested. He stated he wished to bring up some comments for explanation. Mr. Mitchell addressed the comment on visibility requirements stating he has agreed to trim Lots 12 and 13 on Pebblecreek at Amundson to allow visibility to be maintained. He stated Amundson would have a slightly variable right-of-way for visibility reasons. He stated that Cannon and Amundson do not intersect at exactly I I f' I I I I I I II I I I I I I I , I PZ Minutes - 11 June 92 Page 3 90°, but they are within generally accepted tolerable angles. Mr. Mi!('hell addressed the masonry screening wall requirement. He stated that the project was conceived in the first part of this year, and there was no wall requirement for C4U streets at that time. He stated it was the intention for each homeowner to build and maintain their own fence. He stated the Commission had, at that time, required them to upgrade the fence to a 20-25 year fence, a fence similar to a steel-post/wood fence. Mr. Mitchell stated that they had submitted a final plat and plans prior to the ordinance being approved by the Council. He stated they were only aware of the ordinance several days in advance, and feels that it places an unreasonable hardship on the development. He stated they budgeted for a fence along Cannon and Amundson based on the Commission and Council hearings, and feel that the additional requirement of masonry puts a substantial hardship on the client. Mr. Collins stated the reason for the masonry fences along major streets is that wood fences tend to be of differing heights and ages, thereby not being very attractive. He stated the Council has already passed this ordinance, and there is not much else the Commission can do except make a recommendation. He stated he understands there are some fiberglass fence products that could be used. He stated the least they can do is make a recommendation to the Council that they waive the requirement in this case, but that Mr. Mitchell come to the Council meeting with a proposed fence design or fence product that would look good to them. Mr. Lueck stated that the ordinance left the Commission with the requirement for a masonry fence along C4U streets, and the Council changed it. He stated it was then reconsidered by the Council and evolved into the present ordinance. Mr. Mitchell stated he was told that about a year ago the Commission made a recommendation to the Council for a fence along C4U streets, but that the Council thought Is was a hardship and changed it. He stated the Commission brought It back up and it was approved, but that they were unaware of it. He stated they did have a representative at the Council meetin'g, but it was not a Public Hearing, so they had no chance to voice their opinion. Mr. Moody stated that experience has shown that wood fences tend to look unattractive. He stated he is not prepared to ask for a waiver, but does agree that a compromise is in order. Mr. Mitchell stated that his client feels they have made some concessions, and that the requirement was not there when I I f I I I I I I II I I I I I I I tt I PZ Minutes - 11 June 92 Page 4 discussed at the Commission and Council meetings. He stated they do intend to put up a higher grade fence. Mr. Lueck stated the Council passed the ordinance and it had to go into effect sometime. He stated the Council knows these things are coming up, and are well informed about what date they want these things to go into effect. Mr. Bowen stated he is uncomfortable changing midstream, but Mr. Mitchell would do well to look at alternatives and be prepared for the Council meeting. Mr. Collins asked if a wall is built on Amundson and Cannon, will there be enough room for sight distance. Mr. LeBaron stated that at the next Commission meeting there will be a proposed ordinance on visibility triangles, and that this Intersection probably does not meet those regulations. He stated that the Public Works Director felt that some type of traffic control device might be needed since two collector streets are involved. Mr. Mitchell stated he will look at all intersections for sight problems. Mr. Collins made the motion to approve PS 92-12 subject to staff and engineering comments, that the visibility problem at Cannon and Amundson be looked at, and that the Council consider waiving the masonry fence requirement in lieu of an alternative type of fence construction. Mr. Moody seconded, and the motion carried 6-0. STAFF REPORT Mr. LeBaron stated he appreciated the Commissions ence is looking at the revisions to the Zoning Ordin . He asked the Commissioners to mark their calend June 29 at 6:00 p.m. for a workshop and refreshe rse for Planning and Zoning Commissioners off y the Midwest Section of the APA. CITIZEN COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT ere being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. ~¿;~ I Secretary Don Bowen I I f I I I I I I III I I I I I I I t' I City of orth Richland Hills June 10, 1992 Ref: PWM 92-053 MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Director of Utilities SUBJECT: PS92-12; SPRING OAKS ESTATES; Final Plat and Construction Plans I have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on May 19, 1992 and offer the following comments. I ...J.. . The Metes and Bounds Description contains an apparent error in call 37. The phrase "leaving the said east right-of-way," should be moved to call 36. 2 . The curve numbers on the exhibit for Lot 8, Block 1 and Lot 6, Block 3 are missing and incorrect, respectively. J . The appropriate signatures should be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment and Dedication. In addition the Surveyor's seal and signature should be added to the plat. -l . The attached easement dedication should be incorporated into the closi.ng paragraph after the Metes and Bounds description. 5 . All drainage easements dedicated between lots shall include an overland concrete surface. This will discourage property owners from cross-fencing the easement as well as protecting the area from erosion. 6. All offsite easements and exhibits should be prepared and forwarded to the Public Works Department for review. The signed easements need to be transmitted to the Public Works Department prior to filing with the Final Plat. '7 . The minimum frontage for R3 zoning is 65' measured at the Building Setback line. Lots 28-30 Block 3 and Lot 10 Block 5 do not meet this requirement. 8. Additional dimensions need to be added to the north perimeter. At this time, it is difficult to determine the proximity of the proposed Amundson Drive to the existing lots in Sunny Meadows Addition. It also appears that the geometry of Amundson Drive may prohibit adequate visibility when the perimeter masonary fence is installed. 9. All zoning for the proposed lots as well as the adjacent lots should be clearly indicated on the face of the plat. (817) 581-5500 · P.O. BOX 820809 · NORTH AICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 78182 I I ~ I I I I I I - I I I I I I I ~ I PWM-92-053 Page 2 June 10, 1992 10. The Zoning Ordinance indicates that all subdivisions are required to construct sidewalks through~ut. The sidewalks should therefore be added to the construction plans. The sidewalks could be constructed with the improvement of each individual lot. It is important to have the sidewalks shown on the street plans so that the utilities will not be constructed to interfere with the future sidewalk. 11. The street entrance for Cannon Drive is from Davis (PM 1938) Boulvard. A TDHPT Access Permit will be required. 12. Street Lighting is required by section 1-06 of the Design Manual. The locations of all additional street lights should be shown on a seperate plan. The cost for installation of the additional street lights will be paid by the developer directly to TU Electric. 13. The Master Drainage Plan indicates there may be a need for additional grading or drainage improvements associated with this plat. Detailed comments are included with the Engineering review. 14. The Engineers Certification for the the drainage calculation sheet needs to be signed and sealed. 15. Inspection fees will be due prior to starting construction. The current rate is four percent for water and sewer and three percent for streets and drainage. 16. The City of North Richland Hills has adopted water and sewer impact fees. In general these fees are due from the Builder (at the time of construction) and therefor do not significantly impact on the Developer. There are some projects however which require the construction of Public Water and Sewer facilities. If those facilities are included in the City's 10 year plan, then there may be City participation available. 17. There are numerous comments regarding the engineering and construction plans. These comments are recorded on a set of blueline construction plans. The plans will be returned to the Engineer for reV1Slon. The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer of his responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction plans. The City's eventual approval of the construction plans will not signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents. The marked-up blue lines should be returned with the next submittal. Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Director of Utilities cc: Greg W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works/Utilities Barry LeBaron, Director of Community Development I' I ~ I I I I I I II I I I I I I I t' I q = / CARTER & BURGESS INC. ~L ~ ENGINEERS· PLANNERS· SURVEYORS June 23, 1992 City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182 Attn.: Mr. Barry LeBaron RE: Spring Oaks Estates Case PS 92-12 Dear Barry: Enclosed are twenty two copies of the revised plat for the above referenced subdivision. Our responses are as follows: Regarding your letter dated June 11, 1992: 1. We feel that this subdivision should be exempted from the masonry screening wall requirement. At the conception of this project there was no requirement to install walls of any type on C4U streets. Planning and Zoning Commission and Council meetings which took place during the zoning and preliminary plat process required more stringent screening be installed along the two C4U streets associated with this project. My client agreed to the new standards at that time even though not required by any ordinance. Our fmal plat and plans were submitted prior to the council action which approved the masonry requirement. 2. The street name has been changed. 3. The sight visibility has been improved to meet the listed standards. 4. The Amundson/Cannon Drive intersection is not precisely at ninety degrees due to curvature in Amundson Drive, however, it is well within acceptable tolerances of ninety degrees. 5. The reapplication is submitted herewith as promised. Regarding Kevin Miller's letter dated June 10, 1992: 1. All requested changes were made. We would also like to request a determination be made for a refund for street drainage, water and sanitary sewer improvements being installed as part of this subdivision for utilities which are part of the lO-year plan and for oversizing of city streets. Sincerely, CARTER & BURGESS, INC. -.-7~ 1v~h¿ Terry Mitchell, P .E.. Associate TM:kaa 91315001.L07 7950 ELMBROOk DR./STE 250/DALLAS, TX 75247-4951/(214) 638-0145 DALLAS · FORT WORTH · HOUSTON · ARLINGTON · AUSTIN, TEXAS FORT MYERS, FLORIDA CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Community Development 7/13192 _epartment: Subject: Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _operating Budget Other ~ ~~ rCrt-~ I~ atu~ ' clty Manager -- CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , - Council Meeting Date: Request of Northridge II Joint Venture fur CUll ~~ted Fit lal Plat on Lot 1 n 1 and Lots 27-R through 48-R, Block 4, No~hridge Addition. This property is located on Harwood Road, east of Bob Drive. PS 92-16 Agenda Number: The owners of the above referenced Final Plat have submitted a ·Corrected Final Plat· which reflects a correction to the garage placement on three of the lots. The language has been changed to include the provision for a front entry garage which is allowed in the R-3 zoning district. h was the intent of the owner to prohibit the placement of a garage on three of the lots from directly facing homes located across the street. However, the language on the plat failed to recognize that a traditional front entry garage would be an acceptable choice in this subdivision. The State Statutes which regulate platting approval allow a "Corrected Plat- to be approved when a scribnor's error has been made and the number of lots has not been affected. The Planning and Zoning Commission will be considering this Corrected Plat at their July 9th meeting and their comments will be forwarded to the Council over the FAX machine prior to the Monday night Council meeting. No public hearings or notices are required for a corrected plat and this has been placed on your agenda to expedite the review process. Applications for building permits are currently pending on this subdivision. RECOMMENDA TION: It is recommended that the City Council take action on the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .epartment: City Secretary ~ Council Meeting Date: 7/13/92 Subject: Appointment to Beautification Commission Agenda Number: GN 92-82 Place 4 on the Beautification Commission is currently vacant. Ms. Emily Ward has been recommended to fill the vacancy. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Coµncil approve the appointment of Ms. Emily Ward to Place 4 on the Beautification Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget / OtG~~ ~~ ¡¿¿If Y' ~ T~ r_ Department Head Signature " ~ ~anager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 /13/92 Appointments to Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Number: GN 92-83 Place 4 and 5 on the Planning and Zoning Commission are currently vacant. Mr. Victor Baxter has been recommended for appointment to Place 4 and Mr. Fred Wilson to Place 5. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve the appointments to Place 4 and 5. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget Other~ - 7/ " . ~ ¿LL~~~ K/IA :/ ~ .. Department Head Signature City ~~~ger CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .epartment: Subject: City Secretary Council Meeting Date: 7 /13/92 Appointment to Park and Recreation Board Agenda Number: GN 92-84 Place 5 on the Park and Recreation Board is currently vacant. Mr. Dennis Stout has been recommended for appointment to Place 5. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve the appointment of Mr. Dennis Stout to Place 5 on the Park and Recreation Board. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ _ Operating Budget _ - ~~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available K-1l1~~ City anager . Fmance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Ci ty Secretary Appointment to the Civil Service SUbject: Commission - Resolution No. 92-3" Council Meeting Date: 7 /13/92 Agenda Number: GN 92-85 . Mr. Bob Roark on the Civil Service Commission has resigned. The Mayor has appointed Mr. Dennis York to fill this vacancy. His term will expire October 1, 1993. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available e Operating Budget Other /" / /J/~/j~ ¿ÆJ~ /J iZ/11cl-~~ ,. Department Head Signature City Manager I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve Resolution No. 92-37 ratifying the appointment of Mr. Dennis York to the Civil Service Commission. . Finance Director Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I RESOLUTION NO. 92-37 BE, IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The following appointment has been made by the Mayor to the Civil Service Commission of the City for the term shown below: Dennis York Term Expires: 10/1/93 2. Such appointment is ratified by the City Council. Passed and approved this 13th day of July, 1992. APPROVED: Tommy Brown - Mayor ArrEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire - Attorney for City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS _epartment: Subject: Financ~ Prnpørry Tax Refund Council Meeting Date: 7/13/92 Agenda Number: GN 92-86 The Texas Property Tax Code Section 31.11 (a) requires that refunds over $500 be approved by the governing body. The following refund request has been received. Taxpayer Amount Progressive Pathways $626.81 Recommendation: Reason for Refund Overpayment of Tax The tax office recommends approval of the refund as outlined above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _Operating Budget . Other /:) ~ 7/l~ .. Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM (41- , Finance Director Page 1 of CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS _epartment: Finance/Purchasing Subject: Additional Library Shelving I I , Council Meeting Date: 7/13/92 Agenda Number: PU 92-21 Shelving in the adult non-fiction section of the library is at capacity. In order to shelve additional books it is necessary to put them on the top shelf, which is 90" high. The top shelf cannot be reached by most people without a stool. This would create safety concerns. Therefore it is requested the Library be allowed to add another range of shelving. When the original shelves were ordered and installed in 1987, enough shelves and brackets were ordered to shelve at 90". The additional shelving range will require end panels, base shelves, standards and frames and backstops. The original top shelves may be re-used for the proposed range. It has been determined by our Purchasing Division that G. Madison is the sole source for this type of shelving. Therefore competitive bidding will not be required by state law. The price quoted by G. Madison will not exceed $6,350. Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available from the Library's balance of the bar-coding project in accounts 04-2300 and 04-2600 and may be transferred to the capital accoun~ as indicated below. Recommendation: It is recommended Council approve the budget transfer as noted above and the purchase of the additional equipment needed from G. Madison, not to exceed $6,350. Finance Review Source of Funds: _ Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ ., Operating .ßudget ~ Other! .....) '-¡17(;: ,.----/---- I~ ~'" - Department Head Signature I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS _epartment-_ Finance/Purchasing C 01 M to D t 7/13/92 . ouncl ee mg a e: Subject: Award Bid for Automatic Meter Reading Units Agenda Number: PU 92-22 In the 1991/92 operating budget, Council appropriated money for the replacement of three (3) hand-held meter reading units. The units requested in the bid are compatible with the telemetric system currently being tested. Before bidding the hand-held system, Badger Meter stated the proposed units were sole source. Sealed bids were solicited to insure this was correct, and the results are listed below. VENDOR AMOUNT Master Meter Schlumberger N/B N/B N/B Sensus Technologies Badger Meter, Inc. $18,000 The unit bid by Badger is the Model PI hand-held Portable Interrogator. This unit is capable of receiving information from manually keying readings on the keypad or telemetrically. This capability will be required if the telemetric system is chosen. Recommendation: It is recommended Council award the bid to Badger Meter, Inc. for three (3) automatic meter reading units in the amount of $18,000. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ e opera~dget ~ o~r_ ~ f ...__ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance DIrector Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance I Purchas ing C ·,M . D 7/13/92 ouncl eetlng ate: Subject: Award Annual Contract for Batteries Agenda Number: PYT q2-23 At the April 13, 1992 meeting, Council approved the contract for a Mobile Video System to be installed in Police cars (PU 92-11). This system requires 9 volt alkaline batteries to be used in the portable transmitter mounted on the officer's belt. Sealed bids were solicited for 10,000 batteries. That is the estimated annual supply requirements. The bids are outlined as follows: VENDOR BRAND AMOUNT wistol Supply Duracell $16,513 Alexander Battery Duracell 13,400 Ceco Sales Corporation Duracell 12,800 Wholesale Electronics Eveready 10,100 The Police Department tested various brands of batteries during the field test of the mobile video units and found Duracell 9 volt alkaline batteries are the recommended choice. It is estimated that one duracell battery per officer per shift will be required. Rechargeable batteries have been tested for this application, and they do not provide enough power. Funding Source: The award of the contract to purchase the mobile video cameras (PU 92-11) did not included the annual cost of replacement batteries. However, sufficient funds are available from City Council's Budget Reserve for Contingency and may be appropriated to 01-80-04-2900. Recommendation: It is recommended Council approve the appropriation as indicated above and award the contract to Ceco Sales for the annual contract to supply 9 volt batteries to the Police Department in the amount of $12,800. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ e operatin~Udget ~ O~her ~ '-iJ1 v _ ~ t ~-.c ".. Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Fmance Director Page 1 of 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~epartment: I . Source of Funds: ~. Bonds (GO/Rev.) !. Operating Budget I Ott% ~ v ~ I I I ~. _e I I i I ~ ¡ I I I Public Works/Utilities Award of Bid for Miscellaneous 1992 W~tArlSewer Line Replacements Council Meeting Date: 7/13/92 Agenda Number: PW 92-18 Subject: Bids were received on the subject project on July 2, 1992 and the low bidders are shown below. Bidder Amount Calendar Davs Bid Time Circle "c" Const. Co., Inc. Architectural Utilities, Inc. Mid-State Utilities, Inc. $267,817.00 309,706.40 313,939.50 180 120 200 The subject project includes the following improvements. 1. Topper Court 6" water line replacement from STA.0-03.5 to STA.4+23. 2. Nor'east Drive 6" and 8" water line replacement from STA.1 + 57.5 to STA.25 +00. 3. Rufe Snow Drive 8" water line installation from STA.O+OO to STA.31 +25. 4. Valley Park Estates 1 650 feet of 6" water line replacement. 5. Hewitt Street 493 feet of 6" sanitary sewer line installation. The property owners which have requested the Hewitt Street 6" sewer be installed have previously agreed to pay their fair share by executed document. Staff plans to voluntarily assess them one-half the total $24,753.50 costs for the sewer or $12,376.75. This will be in accordance with the manner in which assessments were made on the Crane Road Sewer Project. The collection of these assessments will be handled the same as we handle the involuntary assessments. Fundinq Source: Sufficient funds have previously been budgeted by Council in PW 91-06 on January 28, 1 991 and by approval of revised 3-year Utility Fund CIP Program in PW 92-16 on June 22, 1992. Recommendation: The staff recommends Council award the subject project to Circle "c" Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $267,817.00 for a period of 180 calendar days and authorize staff to collect 500/0 of the cost of the Hewitt Street Sewer from the affected property owners per previously executed documents. Finance Review Finance Director City Manager Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I '- I I I I I I I Ita. I II ~Ð TEAGUE NALL U:c CON S U L TIN G July 6, 1992 817 336-5 773 .........~ ~~.~"'\ ,~ \"",...., "n \S4 \\ \. ',C, AND PERKINS~." ~ \?:,~~).>/-"\"",'.. ~--A I; \~. ,__ ". E N GIN E E R \ç; \~J ~~ '. \\~ \ '~:..~-.:--. ".. ~ ': .~.\ '. 0..\. \\ \', .'- 0 , . , . \ ,\ ,~ /' ~ -~-- ~.\ Mr. Gr~g Dickens, P.E. Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: Misc. '92 Water/Sewer Line Replacements Dear Greg: In accordance with your instructions, we received bids on the subject project on July 2, 1992. As you will note from the enclosed bid tabulation, bids were received from six (6) contractors. Based on the review of the bids received, we have confirmed that the low bidder is Circle "c" Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $267,817.00 (the Water Alternate Bid was $243,063.50 and the Sewer Alternate Bid was $24,753.50.). The Water Alternate Bid amount of $243,063.50 is based on boring and pressure grouting the proposed water lines under the existing street pavement in lieu of open cutting the pavement and repairing. The low bid amount of the base water bid by Circle "c" was $242,790.50 which included open cutting and asphalt/ concrete repair of streets. Due to the inconvenience and "patch look" you get from open cutting, we believe it is well worth the additional $273 to have the water lines bored in these locations. The contract is structured in such a way that the City inspector will still have the option of open cutting streets if it is deemed more practical in certain situations. We are, therefore, prepared to recommend award of the contract to Circle "e" Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $267,817.00 with a contract time of 180 calendar days. We also enclose a copy of the THD permit for construction of the 8" line in Noreast within F .M. 1938 right-of-way. The Rufe Snow Drive permit should be received sometime this week. Should you have any questions regarding the bids received, please do not hesitate to call. Upon approval of the contract award by the City Council, we will commence processing of the contract documents with the Contractor. Very truly yours, JRP/kfs Enclosures TEAGUE ~)L AND PERKINS, INC. ¡ ,.. 7· / ( "--r.' .. · /. (~I f/! h - /! /ß':-/j/~< I /) /} '-......- ' - V\/'- . -' V'/ / .Ii Richard Perkins, P.E. /7./ /. 1\ . p-~ P.S. We are also going to notify Circle "c" of the need to supply the City with a list of sub-contractors they plan to use on this proj ect for your review and approval. 915 Florence Street Fort Worth. Texas 76102 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS _epartment: Subject: e Public Works Award of Bid for Little Bear Creek Channel ~IA;:Iring from PrA~in~t Line Road to Northfield Park ~ Council Meeting Date: 7/13/92 Agenda Number: PW 92-19 Bids were received on the subject project on June 19, 1992 and the low bidders are shown below. Bidder Amount Calendar Dav Bid Time H.F. Construction H.L. Merrill & Son Construction Barrow Construction $21 ,373.60 32,000.00 32,345.00 60 60 60 The bid proposal included seven bid items. An estimated number of hours or days were assumed to be required by each item (equipment, machinery, or laborers) to accomplish this project. The bidders filled in the rate per unit of time designated and multiplied that times the assumed total hours or days given to get his total for that item. All item totals were then added together for the total amount bid for the project. ' All bids submitted excluded bidding a Dragline because they felt the project would not require this machine. They felt it would be more destructive than productive. The low bidder also excluded the amount bid for the Track Loader and Trench Burner from his total bid of $21 ,373.60 because he felt they would not be required. After discussion with him, staff has determined he will use the Trench Burner some which means an additional $2,700 on his· bid. The total amount of his bid would then be $24,073.60. Though staff does not believe he will use the Track Loader much if any, the additional amount of $11 ,812.80 added in for 120 hours of use will bring the total bid to $35,886.40. This amount would cause him to be the high bidder. H.F. Construction was the only bidder to propose a system which will brushog the small brush and trees with a cutter attachment on a backhoe. The others will scrap the brush and its roots off the banks with a backhoe and track loader. Staff feels the method to be used by H.F. Construction will be less costly, cause less erosion, and probably be a faster process. Indication from references submitted and all parties contacted, H.F. Construction has a good reputation in drainage project construction. Funding Source: Council approved a budget of $60,000 for this project on November 25, 1991 with approval of PW 91-34. Sufficient funds are available. Recommendation: The staff recommends award of the subject project to H.F. Construction Company Inc. in the amount of $24,073.60 for a period of 60 calendar days. Finance Review . Fmance Director Source of Funds: a.. Bonds (GO/Rev.) W"Operating Budget Oth r 13-92-61-6000 s Available , 7Ao'~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I Ie ~ ~~ J cJ ~ Sf I ~ ~-t:ç: tß U ç:.V I ~ ~ 11 I ~!J-f I I I I Ie I I I '~J~ · P I- I I r----- ~_=ï. ~~, ~::-:'~ ¡ '~/, I ~~ ~~.¿> .':\ ' '- · -.~ t, :~~~ "- i ~;Iv , ~-=_ .~" . ,1!"" 1- i::-~ 7' ',,/ . . - ~_.....:-........-- ~- -- --+-- - ~-= . --- '::.:::.:.::...- Ð Q ~ 2 j ~ & cs= ~ ~ V} ~~ ~ ~ '< - ---- - . ,'~ ~(Jj' 3 /í ":,_ '. J ;....- 0. .: '. ,. . ...J,. .~-'\.' f ' L--i./ ~ 0 \ ' .'~. I.; ~.-.. ,- . '- , \ :O\OPi~'< ' . '. "".)CJ l j 0~'J~,. 0 I"~~.-"o. '+l .... - -- í" \ ~ ì'·' '" . -~,\~,' " -"~ ' ~~«. "--~". ~'. _ o.~; L~~'''1~fl' ~~)~~'ßj.' è.;¡' . \ / '; '.. · µ~~ j i7 r ~ . -- , - .- . ;~-/ ~", ~ ~.)~ :~~ ~ \;~,; "1~ g . , - ~ I' } . .------:. 6- ~ Q I '\ ,,~/ .. ... ~ ..~; .....~ \' '.. ---'~Þ' ...~. ,,,;;:.~ "'-. ~_IC-.- ? .,. ,¡ ~ tLt - "-'-'-- - : ~ ~~ \~ ~~ \3'"- ~~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works Award of Bid for Boca Raton Drive ~tnrm Dr;:lin Improvamant~ ~ Council Meeting Date: 7/13/92 Agenda Number: PW 92-20 Bids were received on the subject project July 2, 1992 and the low bidders are shown below. Bidder Amount Calendar Dav Bid Time Wright Construction Co., Inc. Radich Construction, Inc. Architectural Utilities, Inc. $144,081.15 149,310.78 157,674.85 45 No Bid 60 This project was designed by Teague Nail and Perkins to mitigate some flooding problems in Flamingo Estates, Phase II area. The City will receive reimbursement for the total project cost. Payment of $94,081.15 by check from an insurance company and in-kind services from the engineer for $50,000 will make up the total reimbursement. Fundina Source: Council appropriated $1 32,000 for the previously constructed Shauna Drive Drainage Improvements and the Boca Raton Drainage Improvements by PW 89-29 on August 14, 1989. Currently, $66,830 remains in the budget for use towards this project. A transfer and the temporary funding of the proposed project is indicated as follows: Original Budaet Additional Funding Total. Revised Budaet Boca Raton Drainage Improvements $66,830.00 $ $ 66,830.00 Temporary Appropriations of Construction Reserves * 77,251 .15 77,251 .15 Total Proposed Budget $144,081.15 * To be returned to reserves upon receipt of the insurance company's check. Recommendation: The staff recommends Council award the project to Wright Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $144,081.1 5 for a period of 45 calendar days and the temporary funding as indicated above. Finance Review ant Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of l- Ie I I I I I I I it I I I I I I ~ I I .~ cT~1}Cflf'I T Þf":~L A1'ff! GP'ENRfí!Þf~ July 6, 1992 Mr. Greg Dickens. P.E. Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland H11ls. Texas 76180 JUl - 7 1992 Dear Greg: Re: Boca Raton Drive Storm Drain In accordance with yourcrequest, we received bids on the subject p July 2, 1992. As you will note..- froa-. the enclosed-bid- tabulation,hi.", .... __ tabulated for the lowest six (6) contractors [bids were received from atôtal of seven (7) contractors]. Based on the bids received, we have confirmed that the low bidder is Wright' Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $144,081.15. We have had previous experience working with this contractor, and we are confident that they can construct these facilities in a timely manner with quality workmanship. Therefore, we are prepared to recommend award of the contract to Wright Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $144,081.15 with a contract time of 45 calendar days. Relative to payment from the insurance company for this project, we have learned that the person handling your claim is on vacation. However, he is expected to be back in the office in time to send a letter of explaaa~~- regarding payment by fax in time for placement of this item in the Council packets for their 7/13/92 meeting. Our brief discussion with the insurance company personnel indicated that they would issue the City a check for the total bid amount less our deductible of $50,000, or a total of $94,081.15. Should you have any questions regarding the bids, please do not hesitate to call. Upon approval of the contract award by the City Council, we will commence processing of the contract documents with the Contractor. Very truly yours, TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC. JRP/kfs Enclosure chard Perkins, P.E. 915 Florence St reet Fort Worth, Texas 76102 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS eepartment: Subject: Source of Funds: a~onds (GO/Rev.)- wuperating Budget O...t!h~l G·l¡J- Public Works Approve Budget for Engineering on ~trtJmmAr DrivA Improvements from Bedford- Euless Road to Grapevine Hiohway 7/13/92 - Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PW 92-21 As directed by Council at the June 8, 1992 meeting, staff has had a traffic impact analysis (TIA) study done by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. (B-A) to determine future width needs for Strummer Drive. A copy of the study is attached. It recommends Strummer Drive be widened to a three lane roadway if the south end will not have a direct connection to the new interchange. By City standards, this will mean a 40-toot roadway in a 60-toot right-ot-way. Since complications with alignment exist at the north end due to the angle ot intersection with Grapevine Highway, exact location of new right-ot-way taking needs to be determined, and an accurate cost estimate of the proposed roadway construction and utility adjustment work needs to be determined; staff recommends Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. be authorized to proceed with detailed survey and plans for the subject project. Upon their completion of a preliminary cost estimate, staff will bring to Council for consideration a suggested construction budget and possible funding alternatives. Initial surveying and preliminary engineering for this project is estimated to cost $40,000. This includes costs for the B-A Strummer Drive TIA study. Fundina Source: A transfer of funds will be necessary in order to provide funding for this project. It is suggested that a transfer be made from the Precinct Line Road ROW account. The proposed transfer is indicated as follows. From: Precinct Line Road 1 3-1 2-89-6000 $40,000 To: Strummer Drive 13-30-92-6000 $40,000 Recommendation: The staff recommends Council authorize a budget of $40,000 for preliminary engineering on the subject project and approve the transfer of funds as indicated above. Finance Review , Fmance Director See Above DE1Pa tment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I t' I II I I I I Ie I I Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 2630 West Freeway, Suite 242 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 USA Telephone: (817) 877-5803 Fax: (817) 877-3214 MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis Horvath City of North ~and Hills Jody Short 4 Robert W. Jen~W1 Greg Dickens FROM: COpy TO: DATE: July 8, 1992 SUBJECT: Strummer Drive Roadway Width Analysis This memorandum documents an analysis that was conducted to evaluate the future capacity needs for Strummer Drive. Strummer Is currently a predominantly residential street that extends from Bedford-Euless Road north to Grapevine Highway. Planned redevelopment In the area will convert existing homes to office space and will add a significant amount of retail/commercial development. These new land uses served by Strummer will generate more vehicle trips than the existing developments and thus traffic volumes on Strummer could increase significantly. This analysis estimated the Increase In traffic volumes on Strummer and developed a recommended roadway cross-section that would serve those volumes. The results of the analysis showed a need for a three-lane section (34-38 feet face of curb to face of curb) that could be built In 60 feet of right of way. Additional turning lanes and right of way may need to be provided at the intersections with Bedford-Euless and with Grapevine Highway. If the intersection at Bedford-Euless were reconfigured to align with the freeway connector, additional traffic would be attracted, and a five-Jane section would be required. Procedure Existing traffic volumes were counted on Strummer Drive north of Bedford-Euless Road and south of Grapevine Highway during the week of June 15, 1992. DaDy volumes, peak hour factors, and directional splits were derived from the counts. The peak hour factor Is a ratio of the highest hour of the day to the total daily volume. The directional split Is the percentage of vehicles traveling In each direction in the peak hour being analyzed. The directional split normally reverses from the AM to the PM peak hour. These vojumes were used as a base condition. Projected PM peak hour and daUy traffic volumes were estimated based on planned development along Strummer and possible changes to Strummer's alignment or the alignment of roadways connecting to [6J I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Strummer. Three scenarios were evaluated. The first, a short term scenario, was intended to represent conditions in the next two years. The proposed power center was assumed to be open with 70 percent 0ccupancy along with PACE and Circuit City. The next two scenarios were for the longer term, eight to tan years from now. The power center was assumed to be fully occupied and all of the homes along Strummer were assumed to be converted to office or commercial use. The first long term scenario assumed that intersection configurations remained as they exist today. The second assumed that the intersection of Strummer and Bedford-Euless would be reconfigured to align with the freeway connector thus allowing easy access from Strummer to IH 820 and SH 121. Service volumes were developed for several alternative roadway configurations. These service volumes were based on information obtained from the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). Research reports were also reviewed to identify the advantages and disadvantages of each roadway configuration. Finally. a recommended roadway configuration was developed that would serve the projected traffic demands and be compatible with planned land uses. Results Existing volumes on Strummer Drive are shown in Figure 1. There are approximately 2,800 vehicles per day south of Grapevine Highway. and 3,050 vehicles per day north of Bedford-Euless Road. Peak hour volumes are also shown. The peak hour factor on Strummer Is approximately 0.1, a value recognized as representing normal roadway operating conditions. Based on the trip generation of the homes served by Strummer and the existing volumes, it is estimated that between 70 and 80 percent of the existing volumes on Strummer are non-JocaJ or cut-through. Projected PM peak hour and daily traffic volumes on Strummer are shown in Figure 2. All three scenarios analyzed are shown, short term, long term, and long term with a direct connection to the freeway. Base traffic volumes were increased at a rate of 2.5 percent per year. Additional traffic generated by the proposed developments were assigned to the area roadways based on probable directions of approach which were developed in previous studies. Development traffic assigned to Strummer was added to the expanded base traffic volumes. With the direct connection to the freeways additional cut through traffic from Grapevine Highway was aJso assigned to Strummer. Service volumes for various roadway configurations considered for Strummer Drive are presented in Table 1. Peak hour and daily service voJumes are shown for levels of service E and C. These service volumes are based on the assumption that Strummer will function as a collector roadway. Table. 1 - Road\Y8y..ªerviçe..yô~l.Iîrìeš...(based..()n· infonnatiol'1.1Ip111NgJ"ÇQ@)...WU<.· Service Volumes LOS E LOS C Confiauration Peak Hour Daily Peak Hour Daily Two-lane undivided 850 8,500 680 6. BOO Three-jane (center turn lane) 950 9,500 760 7,600 Four-Jane undivided 1 .700 17,000 1 ,360 13.600 Five-Jane divided 1 ,900 19,000 1 ,520 15,200 Five-Jane (center turn lane) 1 ,900 19,000 1 .520 15,200 I Ie I I I I I I I r- I I I I I I I I I ! N , a::: w ~ ~ :::> f!: V) BEDFORD - EULESS RD. LEGEND: xxx / XXX DAILY VOLUME / PEAK HOUR VOLUME (WEEKDAY JUNE 1992, CITY N.R.H.) ~ 0) N " ~ f'.. "- . C\I Lt) N C') " C\I ~ o (W) . EXISTING VOLUMES WORK ORDER 1 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS lb] Barton-Aachman A.sociat.a, Inc. F1GURE 1 I I_ I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I ! N I ~ w :¿ ~ :::) ~ V') o It) t~ " CD" o co t~ œ t--- BEDFORD - EULESS RD. LONG TERM LEGEND: o I t ~ CD ffi aò ~ ~ :;:) ~ (J) DRIVEWA Y o ... t~ 10 wi BEDfORD - EUlESS RD. SHORT TERM DRIVEWAY o ... co ti ~ o· w ... ~ ~ ::) Q:: l- V') DRIVEWAY BEDFORD - EULESS RD. o Ø) t~ N ,,,,i .. LONG TERM/W DIRECT CONNECT xxx / xxx - DAILY VOLUME / PEAK HOUR VOLUME PROJECTED VOLUMES WORK ORDER 1 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS [b.] Barton-A.chman U Aaaociat.., Inc. FIGURE 2 I' . Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. A comparison of projected and service vojumes indicates the projected long term vaumes on Strummer without a direct connection to the freeway approach the capacity of a three-lane facility. Additional turn lanes at the intersections with Bedford-Euless, Grapevine Highway, and the power center driveway may be needed to allow Strummer to operate at acceptable levels of service as a three-lane roadway under short and long term scenarios without a direct connection to the freeway.. For the long term scenario with the direct connection to the freeway, the volumes exceed the capacity of a three-lane roadway. A four or five lane facility would be required under this scenario. Due to the character of the development along Strummer and the expected need to allow left turns along the entire length of Strummer, a five-lane section would best serve the traffic demands. A four-lane undivided section would meet the capacity requirements, but would not operate as well with the Interference from left turning vehicles. Recommendations Based on the results of this analysis, a three-/ane section (34-38 feet face of curb to face of curb) would serve the traffic demands on Strummer if no direct connection to the freeways is provided. The three-lane section could be built in 60 feet of right of way. If the direct connection is provided, a five-lane section (60 feet face of curb to face of curb) should be provided. Under either scenario the proposed realignment of the intersection of Strummer and Grapevine Highway approximately 400 feet to the west should be pursued. This will provide more queuing distance for left turning vehicJes on Grapevine Highway. When the intersection of Strummer and Bedford-Euiess warrants the installation of a traffic signal, great care will need to be taken in the coordination of this signal with the signal operations at the adjacent intersections. in order to preclude queuing congestion between intersections. Additional anaiyses should be conducted to determine the intersection approach configurations on Strummer, Bedford-Euless, and the freeway connection for whichever scenario is pursued. Additional right of way should be acquired where needed to provide turn lanes. SA 38880802 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) e Operating Bud~et 0:)1 .( C~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works ~ Council Meeting Date: 7/13/92 Approve Reimbursement to Mobil Pipe Line Company for AcfjlJ~tmAnt~ on Calloway Branch Channel Agenda Number: ~AY 92-06 Improvements, Phase II-b. Resolution No. 92-36 Subject: Mobil Pipe Line Company's existing a-inch and 16-inch pipelines will have to lowered where they cross the proposed concrete channel between Maplewood Avenue and Lola Drive. The two lines will be in conflict with the proposed channel flowline if they are not lowered. Mobil has sent us an agreement for the proposed adjustments. The Mayor will need to sign the attached agreement and the City will need to send Mobil $259,600 as escrow before they will begin construction. If the cost of adjustments is more, the City will reimburse Mobil. If the cost of adjustments is less, the City will receive a refund. Fundina Source: The appropriations for this project including the Mobil pipeline adjustments was approved by City Council on August 23,1991 by GN 91-140. The bonds have been sold and sufficient funds are available. Recommendation: The staff recommends Council approve Resolution No. 92-36 and authorize the Mayor to sign in their behalf. Finance Review l . Finance Director Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I tt I I I I I I Ie I I RESOLUTION NO. 92-36 WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills will be improving the Calloway Branch channel between Maplewood Avenue and Lola Drive and; WHEREAS, Mobil Pipe Line Company (Mobil) will have to adjust an 8-inch and 16- inch pipeline to avoid conflict with this proposed concrete channel liner project, and; WHEREAS, Mobil will require 1 000/0 reimbursement from the City for all costs associated with their adjusting these two pipelines -- estimated to cost $259,600 and; WHEREAS, Mobil will require $259,600 be escrowed with them prior to any pipeline adjustments being started; BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas that: The City of North Richland Hills will reimburse Mobil Pipe Line Company for the total actual cost of the adjustment of the 8-inch and 1 6-inch pipelines across the Calloway Branch channel between Maplewood Avenue and Lola Drive. An amount of $259,600 will be paid Mobil as escrow for the proposed pipeline adjustments. After completion of the pipeline adjustments, a detailed breakdown of the cost will be sent the City with reimbursement for any amount remaining from the escrow or an invoice for the additional costs over the $259,600 escrow. PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th day of July, 1992. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: I Ie I I I I I- I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I Mobil Pipe Line Company P.O. BOX 900 DALLAS, TEXAS 75221-0900 June 23, 1992 Mr. Gregory W. Dickens Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills P. o. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, TX 76182 i ' ,_ ~."..___-..-J. PIPELINE ADJUSTMENT 8" NGL AND 16" CRUDE OIL PIPELINES CALLOWAY BRANCH CHANNEL RC-186 AND CBC-456 Dear Mr. Dickens: Mobil Pipe Line Company owns and operates an 8" NGL pipeline and a 16" crude oil pipeline that crosses Calloway Branch Channel between Maplewood Drive and Lola Drive. The City of North Richland Hills by letter dated May 11, 1992, has requested Mobil Pipe Line Company to adjust its pipelines for the pro- posed construction of a concrete channel liner. By letter dated December 3, 1991 to Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc., I submitted a tentative cost esti- mate in the amount of $248,300.00 to adjust our pipelines. This was based on the preliminary plan and profile submitted. After receipt of the proposed channel construction plans, we have further reviewed the plans and the cost estimate and have prepared a new estimate in the amount of $259,600.00 (as per attached) covering our anticipated cost to perform the proposed adjustment. Therefore, Mobil Pipe Line Company is agreeable to adjusting its pipelines under the following terms and conditions: 1. The total cost to adjust the pipelines will be 100% refund- able to Mobil Pipe Line Company. The estimate cost of $259,600.00 is only an estimate and is based on the latest plans submitted to our Corsicana Office. 2. The City of North Richland Hills shall issue a check payable to Mobil Pipe Line Company in the amount of $259,600.00 as prepayment of the estimated cost of the adjustment. Should the actual cost exceed the prepayment, Mobil Pipe Line Com- pany will expect to be reimbursed for the additional cost. hj000034.wp I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I Mr. Gregory W. Dickens Page Two June 23, 1992 Likewise, if the cost is less than the prepayment, Mobil Pipe Line Company will refund the difference between the prepaid and the actual cost. Mobil Pipe Line Company agrees to furnish copies of all cost records to the City of North Richland Hills upon written request. 3. Mobil Pipe Line Company agrees to begin adjusting its pipe- lines within a reasonable time after this agreement is executed and returned. Mobil Pipe Line Company shall not be responsible to the City of North Richland Hills or any other entity or persons for delays, if any, in commencing or completing the required work. 4. No work will be performed over or near our pipelines by the City of North Richland Hills or its contractors until the pipelines have been adjusted. This letter is written in duplicate and if it meets with your approval, please have both copies signed by the appropriate authority in the space indicated below and return one copy along with the City's check in the amount of $259,600.00 and we will proceed with the planned work. If you have any questions, please direct your correspondence to my attention. Very truly yours, ~... /1 ~I¡? ~--7 -~ // / ~ - .yI./. rJ...t~ ~urley ~/ins Right of Way Department HJ/hrv Attachment cc: L. C. Co 1 e Approved and Executed this day of , 1992. By Title hj000034.wp I Ie RT~"- ~ï""" - -.J.,.... .......__'\.1-.. "'~~j Vf(--- I .' ....J H : I f\ H !: \:""I! .. \ i\ I ' ~~,_)~..L~ ~ 1.. L; l.JJ-.:" tj '._~",__'l..It~~l.'t! I ;·~AI;L(j~:.~AY· BFL~.N:.~H ;.~HANNEL ~. ~1 ;.:;;--;: TT ~~ ~ '" L.....I ~ , ._. '.' ....... ......... R.e~COll"Le aJ;.):proximat,el:i 220 ÏeelJ oÏ eaell oÏ t,11e Keller- TO C:'or·sic:.-3.:n6. 8" NGL ar1<] 1611 Crt1.de (Jil Pil:~lines at MP 82.4 tc) accomodate tl'"le co~n6trltetion of ~..11o~1ð.)1 Brë.llCh C11an:nel in the (~ity of North Ric111e.rld Hills. I I I I I PEEL Tr~"1II·JAF.)r ~~UP'\lEY ?..¡ DF'.AJ~I N(;~~ .. .L LaJ:lci St1rVE::lo r PíJ.:'€ 1 ine~c '; .. .1 E!1gÌì1eert 1 C:onstriJction ~~u"per~ti30r· 1.. Rig}1t-OÏ-~"~ay' Age!l"C Out-of-Tot~11 E}:1-1€!lSeS [)r e..Ï t SIlið11 I MATERIALS tt 220 220 I 4 4 2 I 2 2 2 I 2 2 4 I I I Ie I I -' 8. 625 II OIl X o. 500 II ~~ Gr. X -42 Li11e PiJ:."'€ FEE C:oe..ted -' 16 II or) x 0.500" ~\ll Gr. X-42 Liì1e F)ipe FEE C·oa te<j 8.62E}" 10 [) Pr'efabricated PiJ;ïë Be!1d 16" 10 [j Prefal)ricated Pi¡:oe Bell(i 8" &~SI 600 Stopple Fittillg 8 It Illller Pl1..1gS for Stopple Fi ttillg 16" ANSI 600 Stopple Fi ttíllg 16" Imler Plttgs for Stopple Fi ttil1g 8" ft~SI 600 RF Blil1d Flange 16" ANSI 600 R.F Blind Fl811ge 2" T.D..W. TIìreati-O-Ri!ig Tap:pi:ng Fitting Misc. Bolt6~ Nuts~ & Gaskets Misc. Coating Material tiisc.. Pi:ç~ t'"lô:cl~e~cs ,y Test. Leads ~ale8 Tax on Material r-:age ~ 3 da:!s Oâ-:1S 2 da:13 f; Gave ..~, clays 16 meJ:l-clays 5 ctav6 $15 ../foot $40 /'foot $1 ~ 000 /1)end $1 ~ 500 /r!€!ld $1~800 /ftg. $450 ./ftg. $5,500 ¡lftg. $1~200 ./ftg. $400 /'flg. $700 ¡lfIg. $100 //ftg.. r:~ ~ 5;{ 660 1 "t037 1..600 ---------- ;:. (i n .--' '...' '.._! ;::¡ n n ~¿{)O 600 !J~}-}lU1-92 $f5 ~ 7E~7 St(ototal 3~300 8~BOO 4"t000 6..000 3,600 900 11~OOO 2,400 800 1~400 400 3..000 2 .. (~)C}(~} ---------- ~B4~·3 ~ 1 !.~;(~) :1; 4 ~ ~.~.:;3 ~~! $E!~>, 169 - - - - - ~ ~::~ ~tl t=~ l~ ~:~ t; ð~ 1 I' __ 1+)BIL ?IPE LINE I ;~CNSTRUCTION OF I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I c{.~; t~·l F) l~ l>fl- t·~ E~~ f.) I !'~ E S .i -,.." r- ....,.. ~ i._.~lll e I ~! (! (j l115 ~~í:: t.(:- 1:.~ ... .1 1 Compðl1Y Iìispector L;:t..J:ld S llrveyo r C,:.)nstrllCTion SlTper......lisor .. .i 1 Eì1gi!1eer Otlt-of-TO{~l E}:-!?eì1SeS Li:rÜ{.Be 1 t. : :~.·4Cu Tr>lCi·: Bacl{}10e I~J/ 01=-er'E\ ror 1 Ha.lll Tr1.1Cl{ ~·1 /·oI;-ere.. tor D5 I).:)zer t.Ji tJh âì1g1e blade w,/oJ.:~rator 561 Sidel)oorn 1 :2 ~·~eldeì' i.:J/'rig ~ We 1 (ie:c .- 8 HE: 1 ¡:.~r 1 FOrenìðJl 4 LaDOrer (Jt¡ t. - (:0 Ï - ~T 0 \~Tn r..X1-ì€ n s e 5 ... tJ 1 C: l{l¡ 1,:.~' 1 =X:-R£f~l Ins:pect i()ìl Cre\~ Field }oint. FEE C:·:)atiìlg S110riìlg ê...nd. Di tC!1iìlg WlDROSTATIC TEST j ß!lgl11eer ,) ~leel1a:nic 1 C11 i e f t..T 0 t! 11:18 1;ïBC to r ChIt. of TO~~l E}:peìlses tì ¿ VaetH.un Trt¡ck ~~,/o:pera.tor Üllt of TO{..¡jl EÀþ1E!!lSeS .a- a_" __" ..... ~~~ e.. t. e f' r; i ~ "-"';-', ~:4: ;-, f 'T' .-. ,--; +- .... ~ ~ 1::"' '-4 ......, ._, ~ ._. ...... t.a.~ .!:; 1- ~ Ì"-~ ~ _.. _. - ¡,I-"'~)"Ì'-ì.r.-.; ;-1;; \i ~ t'1 -; ¡-. ; ¡:=.;. ~ ~_. ._. 4~r ._~ ~..~ .. w_....&..¿. 0_' ~ ",_. ...... 1 Air (~ompressor S gl.l e e gee I .;) r 1 6 t1 ~I ¡ 1"'-,r:. Sqtleegee f.'--.r-' c: l-il1=~ 1 ~rA CJA 0' ..... .-.....0 "_. a...-. 0 ~.-lC,:: ü 0 clays 0 clays ..1 liays ~ 4 (ia.YB 38 me.l1-(la~¡6 .. .1 ~._} !....l.. (.1. ."{ .::: 10 da~Ts 10 da~l8 1 r: dê..yS ...L \_-' dê..:IS I clays 1 ,\ ,jays ..L l... 10 (fays 108 n1an-da~16 10 da.y"s ~j days ...) clays 3 clays ,_~ days 15 illéû1-õ..lays 3 clays 6 maìl-clays ..:~ C1a~¡5 2..500 1~B21 2~200 1..000 l~OOO ,3 .. 800 ,;:'~ ., ¿ (-) (-) 6..500 :'..700 4..700 Ö..600 2..240 2~200 7..200 Ö..400 4..000 1~500 7..000 2,000 ---------- 09-tJ'url-92 $74~561 Stfbtotal 750 1,638 750 1~500 3~600 300 ~!oo 500 ._:!(...J ~..} 300 ::)00 :) I.) U ---------- 11 - .1·35 Sul!t,()t.·al I' ' __r'YÆIL PIPE LINE I TIE-IN NEJ"Ì PEE, I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I CCJ!1PAifí TAKE UP EXISTING~ ~~x' ¡,~~ LEAN - U F' 1- :':~~·:)n6truct iorl - . ::; u. ~pe [.....; 1 SO r' ~ 1. AssistðJ:1t C011strU.etio11 Sllf~rvisor- C1-1ief ~Job In8¡:~ct.or E~rlg irH~e I' Weld.er ~7/trig We 1 der .I' s He l:per 3ð.(:yj-loe Ctr;,;erator ITr\.lck Driver- i-' 11:---E: 1.1 :ne r' Machinis~ (S~oppling Crew) (~¡t-of-To~m E~~nses 1 .i 1 1 .L ..... i-J L-' Lin¥.Bel t 3400 Track Bð.ckJ10e ~"ì./·~::yper·at.or ~\Ìe ld.ert ~l ,/r'ig We 1 (Ie r .. sHe 1 J.:~ r Foreman L---3. 00 re r ~~_\ -... to! Cjtl1::-0f-T,.)~·Tn ~}:];~:nse3 ..J.. X-Ray Ins~~ction Crew Ni t~cogeÌi [JiSl)le..cemer1t or 8" NGL Ni trogen Dis:placement oÍ 16" C:rt.1(je ProchJct Loss S\.lt)totô.l Rigl1t of v~ay Damages CWerhead @ 19.11% TOTAL ESTlMATE[J C~OST NtJTES : :=> ·jays 5 (:lays 10 (lays 4: <iays 4 days 4 days - clavs ..) .-...-T,-, - ·.....!_~..I,'/O b (lays 63 man-days 5 (lays 4: àays 4: ciô.yS 10 days 10 d.avs 104 rnarl-(tays 4 days 1..250 1,000 2,500 1..000 799 723 q~n .::. :1~. ;.-::. 3..182 6..300 B..200 4 ~ aGc) 1..920 2..200 10..800 ¡:OJ ?(¡n 1,000 4~OOO B..OOO 2..000 ---------- 09-tJUYl-92 $69,260 St¡btotal $212 .. ~j4E! 5..000 ---------- $217 .. 94E\ 41..648 ---------- ---------- $259,600 Cost. estinlate j s t!ð.ôëO. "-1Ì'; e;{Céf,r~:\'I.iO!l a.!lC! \..¡orl~ing ill tlle Cl1â!1l1el. 1. Cost. estin1ate is l1âsed. on nornìal. t~oek excavatiO!1. .:-, . E:-:tensive r'ocl{ e;·:cavê,t.io:n \~j_J.l sigJlifi.ce:ntl)T increase D~1·tt\G.ALhAl~EZ - 6,,....8 //Si 2 (~{=~ 3 t. r ,,-. y. C1i-, .:! \J (:ia:~l8 gOGo. Page ~j ...... .-. .-: ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~ Council Meeting Date: 7/13/92 Public Works Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 4 of $102.555..21 for Community Center Parking Lot Improvements Agenda Number: PAY 92-07 This project was awarded by Council on November 25,1991 by PW 91-35 to AII-Tex Paving, Inc. in the amount of $280,201.10. Final payment to the Contractor will make his total earnings on the project $282,731.10. The Contractor has earned $2,530.00 over the contract amount due mainly to replacement of additional asphalt curb, replacement of additional concrete sidewalk, and replacement of two existing storm drain grate inlets. The cost of engineering exceeded the budgeted amount by approximately $11,900 due to numerous design changes. Also, approximately $3,300 was spent on conduit material to provide for future lighting and irrigation projects; plus other miscellaneous costs. The Contractor substantially completed this project on April 8, 1992. The contract completion date was May 14, 1992. The project is now totally complete with all final adjustments having been made. Fundina Source: The total required budget to final out this project is $319,900. The additional funding may be appropriated as indicated: From: 1991/92 Drawdown Schedule $17,695 To: Library/Recreation Center Parking Lot 1 3-50-01-6000 $17,695 Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of final payment to AII-Tex Paving, Inc. in the amount of $102,555.21 and the transfer of funds as indicated above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other: , Finance DIrector tment Heaq Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of I' -- I I I I I I I It I I I I I I -. I I - KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. t'()NSUl flNC fN(~INffRS I Fort Worth- Dallas July 2, 1992 rr:¡WTI;-tlfff~t ;:_~:, · , - r '.'. ,-. '\ Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 _....-.--..-......---- __._...,...L-<>..&._...._... ....,Þ \ -- R.e: 3-363, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILL,S~ COMMUNITY CENTER PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS PARTIAL PAY CONTRACTOR'S NO.4 AND FINAL Enclosed is one (1) copy of Partial Pay Contractor's Estimate No. 4 & Final, dated July 2, 1992, made payable to ALL-TEX Paving, Inc. in the amount of $102,555.21, for l11aterials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of May 6, 1992. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Mr. Larry D. Jones, as indicated by his signature on the estil11ate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. Please see the attached "Construction Project Status Report" for the differences in original estimated contract quantities and final as-built quantities and for costs of each pay item in the project. The original contract amount is $280,201.10. Contractor earnings total to $282,731.10 which is $2,530.00, (0.90-percent), over the original contract amount based on original estimated quantities and contract unit prices. The following is a discussion of the primary reasons for the over run of the Contract Amount. 1. ..Additional 8-inch asphalt curb was replaced during construction. 2. Additional 4-inch concrete sidewalk was replaced along with the construction of 4-inch concrete sidewalk on the south side of the Library in lieu on the proposed 6-inch concrete driveway. 3. Two (2) existing storl11 grate inlets proposed to be reused were not found in good condition and therefore were replaced. 4. The full $5,000 amount of the Miscellaneous Paving Allowance was used because of the additional paving patchwork done prior to the proposed asphalt overlay, the removal and disposal of trench spoil which was created by City forces during the installation of the landscape irrigation conduit, the breaking, removal and disposal of the existing concrete planters, and the lumber for all weather walkway. 1901 CENTRAL DR.. SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO 817/267-3367 . FAX 817/354-4389 I' -. I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ,. I I Page 2 July 2, 1992 Honorable Mayor and City Council, Community Center Parking Lot 1111provements Partial Pay Contractor's Estimate No.4 & Final The contract completion date was May 14, 1992. The substantial completion date was April 8, 1992, which was 82 days under the Contract Completion Time of 150 calendar days. A final inspection walk through was performed on April 29, 1992 where discrepancies were found and noted. To the satisfaction of the inspector the contractor has corrected these discrepancies as of June 29, 1992. The two (2) year period of maintenance begins on this date and therefore will terminate on July 2, 1994. In accordance with the provisions of Item 3.2.11(a) of the Contract Documents, the l11aintenance obligation includes "storl11 sewer line breaks or stoppage, sealing of pavement cracks, repair of pavel11ent buckling or other failures, along with failure of all concrete flatwork and other concrete structures". We recommend that the tinal paYI11ent, in the amount of $102,555.21, be 111ade to ALL-TEX Paving, Inc., 2462 Walnut Ridge, Dallas, TX 75229. Please call if you have any questions. S\.l~i\~ -<.~ SUSAN L. SCHWINGER, P.E. SLS/lld Enclosures xc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manager Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works Mr. Larry D. Jones, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness" Director of Finance Mr. Mike Johnson, ALL-TEX Paving, Inc. I NaN II 0')0>11 ~¡¡ J~ I I IE ;; <0 1 -c ('t) c: LU I~··~ Q).- J:J ...... OnsQ) JOe.. I r-- C'tS I~ oð ~ I I o z I~ , o I~ø c:t- oZ (JW ::E W > o a: a.. ~ I I I ~ Z ~ .. a:: .. <! .. a... I-CI: I gs~ a...Z LUW CI:O u (f)>-C: :JI-- 11-- <!Z I-::::J 0 (f)~C: 1-0> (J(Jns ,.~..: -W l- I .-J I~·~~ (JU ~ CJ) .. CI:G>'- 1-00 (/) I z- u Ouns ÜQ)'- .. 0 c: .. '- 0 .. a.. Ü a: 1-1- ZZ O:J 00 :E .<! t- O l- i- (f)W Ot- O<! o --I ~O t-I- o I- a:1 0- a:a: ww >0 10Z :J I- o .-J oooo~oo~oooooooooooooo OOOO('t)WOWOOOOOOOOO~OOOO ~~O')~N('t)OMOO~OOOONONOOOO ONMWWOWO>O~O~OM~MON~~OO ~~OO')~O~~~~~~OWM~OONWOO M M ~M~~O~~N~~~~~N~ ~N ~ M O')N M OOOO~OO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOO('t)WOWOOOOOOOOO~OOOO ~~O')~NMOMOO~~O~ONONOOOO ONMWWOWO')O~ONO~~MON~~OO ~~OO')~O~~~~~~OMM~OONWOO M M ~M~~O~~M~~~~~N~ ~M ~ M O')N M a: a: LUW >0 OZ ::::J t- (f)a: 00 o 0000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000 OOOOOOOOOOO~O~OOOOOOOO O~ 0 00::> M 0 I OOOOOOOOOO~~OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOM~O~OOOOOOOO I- LU Zt- WW (J.-J a: a.. w::E a... 0 () OOOOOOOOOO~NO~OOOOOQOO OOOOOOOOOONMOO')OOOOOOO~ ~.--........-~......~.....-,.......--..-~...- ...........-.....~........-............- 0000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000 -0 oooooooooooroowoOOOOOON OM N 0 NM 0 o I- >- .-J I- 0000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000 ·0 WOO')NO')moO')o~~o~~~roOO')~~N~ ~~MroOO~~ro~N~ NM~OON~ roNO~~~roMO OM _~MOro~ o M ~~~~N N~·N ~N :JI- COZ I<! (f)::J <!O 1->- (Jt- ~- a:t- I-Z Z~ O:J 00 WOO')NO')O')OO')O~~N~N~ro~O')~~N~ ~~Mrooo~~ro~NM ~M~ ON~ roNO~~~roMO 0::>0 N~M ro~ o M ~r-r-~N ~N N- N OOOO~O~~OOOOOOOOOOOOOO O~OO~~NroOOO~O~OOO~OOOO w t-() Za: :Jo.. ~N_N~OOMO~~NONO~ONOOOO o 0 ~~OO N 0 ~U") U") t- ·I ·II >-~~~>->->->-~~~~(J~>->-(f)~~~U(J .<! .<!<! (f)~(/)~(f)(/)(/)(/)~.-J.-J(/)W(/)(/)(/)~(/).-J.-JWW Z :J z o ~ . Q)"C......"C Q)- ,-'-.cUJ(/)('QG>UJQ, Q)OQ,('Q..........O......('QQ) .-.~UJCO~oucna: ......_<! ns :::::J('Q '-..':II::;a.xE C)-~xnsuE-> c: ~O-onso~o.. 006 LLüt-ü UJQ)Q)-- UJuUJ-- nsc:ns~~ nsaJaJaJ C)~ . 0 xJ:J..o cc--EE -~WLU ~« o Q) Q) enUJ ~nsen - CO >- ns ns 3; X ~ Q) Q) Q) -c-> .- LL (/) . u u o -XX-~ -0 « C-LULU::J c: .- :::::J 0 .-. OO<D-->C)O()C(1) .- (/) ('Q > > ns - . ..0 a. c1) 0 a.. - a.. a... (1) c: NO--.... .«.... en ~N I: ::J:::::J:::::J U U a.OUJ ns~~() -c _ 01- () I (f) . C) C) () c: . c 0 C :::::J > M M Q) UJ c: > (f) a:: >- 0 u 0 1-'- 0 C .... ._ ._ ._ E CO ~ 1-:':' -- () c: () -C Q) U a: a: .- C) -X-a: ~ro- 0 ~-cc:COons ._ W UJ - ~ 0 ~ N - ns ~ () ~ u 0 ns 0 (/) (/) ~ N en .- - 0 0 u .c u U .- (/) - () - 0 - en Q) X :::::J 0 .- oð 06 0.'- .J.. .- .c; ns ns X ns > W 0 ~ 0 ~ .c; en .c -c: .c t- -C Q) ~ .-'- E 0 o -C:MNt-J:J~<!t-1-1- ·-u.cOO....- uE>~1-1 I aa :. -CJ)t-~ OX c: Q) Ens: a a: ;. :. : :. :. :. ro 0'-:' C):. - 0 ~a::a:(f)W~a:NWWro~W~-(f)~W~W(f)~ t- o.. .-..0...... U Q) Q) -()-- ns....Q>ccE..c::«uu > ::J .... 0 0'- a. ~ c: c ns()u()..........enI-- u c (/) a.. « x 00- wc:(JO a: o (/) W o ~ L.U I- a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. 0..0.. a..a..OOOOO _NM~~w~o::>mo-NM~~~r--NM~~ o z ......-...................-..-...........-......- o I I t I o I N I - I o I ro I N I I I o t I I , M I r- I N co N o o 0(1) M 01 U') ro -c N c a. <! U C o U 00 cD ~ <X) N r- U') ~ 0') ~o ~~ N .. en -0 en() o (JQ) OJ O)ro C C > ro ro .... 0..0 ro Q) a: 06 o men co r- ~ OCl> o -c -:1" 0') o Cl> 01 C ro .c U I , I I C-I .- a. I roE' EOI OJ(J a:: u C (/) W U a:: D- en U >- .... ro OJ 00.. I- z ~ o 2 <! (f) w ON U') ~ I- I- Z <! ::J a o w I- <! 2 Q) (1) E.-I .- ro 1-0 -0 CI- a (JI- I- w(/) I-LU « oz o o 1-0 W (/)(/) (.9<! 2CC OJ ro Cl>0 ro D- o. .... E Cl> 0 -c(J 21- a::z « :::J wO 2 a::<! o I- I- O(J <!« a: a: I- I- ZZ 00 O(J o 1:J ....::.:: OJ ~ .c o u ;:(f) ~N 0') m 0') m __ I .-J .-J «<! t- I- 00 I- I- , , 0>- w<! O~ , , co ~