HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1991-01-28 Agendas
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CORRECTION
PUBLIC HEARING
The Public Hearing to be conducted by the North Richland Hills City Council to consider
the Community Development Block Grant 17th Year for Improvements to the Glenview
Senior Center Parking Lot will be held at City Hall, 7301 Northeast Loop 820 at 7:30 p.m.
on January 28, 1991 instead of 6:30 p.m.
~ ~-/~/~
ommy Brow - M or
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
JANUARY 28, 1991 - 6:10 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall C_ouncil Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820.
I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
1. Discussion on Closing of City Hall Due to Bad
Weather - Mayor Pro Tern Davis (5 Minutes)
2. GN 91-11 Water & Sewer System Extension and Assessment
Policy - Ordinance No. 1707 (Agenda Item No.
16) (10 Minutes)
2A. PW 91-04 Approve Budget for Valley Park Estates Sewer
Extensions (Agenda Item No. 20) (10 Minutes)
2B. PW 91-05 Approve Budget for Crane Road Sewer
Extensions (Agenda Item No. 21) (10 Minutes)
3. GN 91-12 Amendment to Ordinances No. 1679 and 1701 -
Approve Additions to the Capital Improvements
Plan, Increase in Maximum Impact Fee Levels,
and Impact Fee Collection Levels - Ordinance No.
1708 (Agenda Item No. 17) (10 Minutes)
4. PW 91-03 Award of Bids on Watauga Road Median
Irrigation and Landscaping (Agenda Item No. 19)
(5 Minutes)
5. PW 91-06 Approve Budget for Miscellaneous Water and
Sanitary Sewer Main Replacements for 1991
(Agenda Item No. 22) (10 Minutes)
6. Other Items
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
7. Work Session (5 Minutes)
IR No. 91-15, Special Council Workshop
8. *Executive Session (5 Minutes)
a. Personnel
b. Briefing on Pending Litigation
c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition
I 9. I Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. I I
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is
contemplated, it will be taken in open session.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JANUARY 28, 1991
For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion
and/ or action.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Pledge of Allegiance
5. Minutes of the Regular Meeting
January 14, 1991
6. Presentations by Boards & Commissions
Library Board Minutes
7. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent
Agenda
8. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by
Asterisk (9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 19 & 22)
*9. PS 90-33 Request of Amstar Properties, Inc. for
Final Plat of Lot 6R & 7, Block 1, North
Edgely Addition (Located on the west
side of Edison Drive)
il"
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
* 10. PS 90-36 Request of Resolution Trust Corporation
for Replat of Lot R17A-1, Block 34,
Holiday West Addition, Section A
(Located at 5721 & 5723 Westchase
Drive)
*11. GN 91-06 Appointment to Planning and Zoning
Commission and Capital Improvement
Advisory Committee
*12. GN 91-07 Appointments to Beautification
Commission
13. GN 91-08 Public Hearing - Community
Development Block Grant - Resolution
No. 91-03
* 14. GN 91-09 Property Tax Refund
15. GN 91-10 Presentation of Fiscal Year 1989-90
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
16. GN 91-11 Water & Sewer System Extension and
Assessment Policy - Ordinance No. 1707
17. GN 91-12 Amendment to Ordinances No. 1679 and
1701 - Approve Additions to the Capital
Improvements Plan, Increase in
Maximum Impact Fee Levels, and
Impact Fee Collection Levels -
Ordinance No. 1708
18. GN 91-13 Public Hearing on Davis Boulevard (FM
1938) Assessments
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 3
I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
*19. PW 91-03 Award of Bids on Watauga Road Median
Irrigation and Landscaping
20. PW 91-04 Approve Budget for Valley Park Estates
Sewer Extensions
21. PW 91-05 Approve Budget for Crane Road Sewer
Extensions
*22. PW 91-06 Approve Budget for Miscellaneous Water
and Sanitary Sewer Main Replacements
for 1991
23. Citizens Presentation
I 24. I Adjournment I I
POSTED
1- cJL/- c¡ /___.._-~---
Date
¿¡ .' ¿/:s .~ Œl.-------
fun?;
Cìly Secretary
at!? ff¿d5óY'- .--
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. IR 91-13
Date: January 23, 1991
Subject: Metes and bounds descriptions
for City Limits adjustments
City staff from the cities of North Richland Hills and Keller
have been discussing adjustments to the City Limit boundaries
along Bursey Road, Wilson ~OQ~ and at a point near the
intersection of Precinct Line Road and Davis Boulevard. Boundary
revisions are needed to ClOSE exj~ting gaps, provide continuity,
and to facilitate the constru~t10n of proposed new thoroughfares.
The city of North Richland Hills ~ill be widening Bursey Road
dQ~ing 1991. The north righ·:-of-way line of Bursey Road is
proposed to become the common City Limits boundary with the City
of Kéller. The existing City Limits lines are currently
separated by a few feet and do not coincide with each other along
this route.
Tarrant ~ounty is· interested in extending North Tarrant Parkway
in a westward direction which will generally follow the alignment
along Wilson Road. The administrative staffs of the ci ties of
Keller and North Richland Hills are in agreement to recommend
establishing the north right-of-way line of the North Tarrant
Parkway as the common boundary.
The City of Keller is also interested in extending Pearson Road
to connect with Precinct Line Road near its present intersection
with Davis Boulevard. It is being proposed to adjust the City
Limit boundary to allow this intersection to be within the City
of Keller.
The three boundary adjustments described above will require
ordinances for the City Councils of both cities to consider. A
written metes and bounds description is required to prepare the
annexation ordinances. The firm of Knowlton, English, Flowers
has been instructed to complete the necessary surveys and prepare
written legal descriptions for inclusion in the appropriate
annexation ordinances. The cost for each city involved is
$3,150.
The appropriate annexation ordinances will be submitted for City
Council consideration during February or March 1991. This report
is submitted at this time for informational purposes.
13~ lB~
Barry LeBaron,
Director of Community Development
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CI1Y
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - JANUARY 14, 1991 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting to order January 14, 1991, at 7:30 p.m.
2.
I(OLL CM"L
Present:
Tommy Brown
Lyle E. Welch
Frank Metts, Jr.
Charles Scoma
Byron Sibbet
:1V!ayor
Councilman
C'Jllncilman
Councilman
Councilman
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
C.A. Sanford
Jeanette Rewis
Rex McEntire
Greg Dickens
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
City Engineer
Absent:
Richard Davis
Mack Garvin
Linda Spurlock
Mayor Pro Tern
Councilman
Councilwoman
3.
INVOCATION
Councilman Welch gave the invocation.
4.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 10,1990
APPROVED
Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Scoma, to approve the minutes of
the December 10, 1990 meeting.
Motion carried 4-0.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
..
January 14, 1991
Page 2
5.
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING DECEMBER 17,1990
APPROVED
Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve the minutes of
the December 17, 1990 meeting.
Motion carried 3-0; Councilman Scoma abstaining due to absence fronl the meeting.
6.
PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSI(,NS
BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION
Councilman Scoma explained the "Remembrance Trees" program that the Beautification
Commission wanted to initiate.
Action on this item was deferred until after a meeting with the Beautification
Commission on finalizing the brochure.
Council was reminded of a meeting January 15th at 7:00 p.m. at the Recreation
Department on horticulture.
7.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
Councilman Scoma removed Items No. 11 and 17 from the Consent Agenda.
8.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22 & 23)
APPROVED
Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve the Consent
Agenda.
Motion carried 4-0.
10.
PZ 90-16 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING -
CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1080
REGARDING SPECIFIC USE PERMITS-
ORDINANCE NO. 1705
APPROVED
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
January 14, 1991
Page 3
Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to come
forward.
No one appeared.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing.
Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No.
1705.
Motion c{lrried 4-0.
11.
PS 89-34 REQUEST OF CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
FOR FINAL PLAT OF FAIR OAKS ADDITION,
3RD FILING (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
SMITHFIELD ROAD, NORTH OF BURSEY ROAD)
APPROVED
Mr. Allen Greer, Consulting Engineer, spoke in favor of the request.
There were several questions regarding the City Engineer's comments and sidewalks
within the subdivision.
Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve PS 89-34 with
the following stipulation: all engineering comments previously made regarding the plat
be finalized to the acceptance to the City Engineer prior to any building permits being
issued, provision for sidewalks on all streets within the subdivision be noted on the plat.
Motion carried 4-0.
*12.
PS 90-29 REQUEST OF JOHNSTON & SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
FOR REPLAT OF LOT lRl, BLOCK 6, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION
(LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE
AND MEADOW LAKES DRIVE)
APPROVED
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
...
January 14, 1991
Page 4
*13.
PS 90-37 REQUEST OF REALTY ALLIANCE OF TEXAS, LTD.
FOR ABANDONMENT OF THE REPLAT OF LOT 5R, BLOCK 1,
WOODLAND OAKS ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF NOB HILL DRIVE, WEST OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD)
APPROVED
14.
GN 90-171 CON'l~CT VV1TH CHARLES EVANS FOR
LEGISLATIVE Sl~RVIf~ES (POSTPONED AT THE
DECEMBER 10, 19~)0 COUNCIL MEETING)
DENIED
Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to deny GN 90-171.
Motion carried 4-0.
*15.
GN 91-01 AUTHORIZATION OF SIGNATURES FOR UNMARKED LICENSE PLATES
- RESOLUTION NO. 90-01
APPROVED
*16.
GN 91-02 PROPERTY TAX REFUND
APPROVED
17.
GN 91-03 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL PLANNING SERVICES
APPROVED
Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve GN 91-03 with
the following changes: first paragraph, last sentence, add "in conjunction with the
proposal dated December 2, 1990."; Scope of Services - after "Proposal" add "dated
December 2, 1990, shall be made"....; Item 2b add "The Task 7 _It Evaluation of ....; Item
2c after "concurrently with the" add "Task 7"....; Page 3, Compensation delete "sectors"
and replace with "Land Use Sector Plans"; Item 4.2 Determination of Development
Goals and Objectives, second paragraph, replace "generic" with "preliminary"; Item 5.2
Preparation of Land Use Sector Plan, after "and wastewater plans," add "Economic
Development Plans,"....; Item 5.2 after first paragraph, insert new paragraph "Planning
Resources Group's evaluation will include our professional recommendations for changes
to the Citýs current land use plan for utility services, thoroughfares, parks and recreation
and economic development. Our evaluation will also include detailed information of
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
January 14, 1991
Page 5
regional land use and development trends."; Item 7.1 last sentence, after "recommended
action plan" insert "and suggested changes to the ordinances"....
Motion carried 4-0.
*18.
GN 91-04 SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
ON DAVIS BOULEVARD (FM 1938) -
ORDINANCE NO. 1706
APPROVED
19.
GN 91-05 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADDITIONS
TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN AND INCREASE
IN MAXIMUM IMPACT FEE LEVELS
APPROVED
Council was advised no action needed to be taken on this item. The hearing was only
for comments from interested persons.
Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to come
forward.
The following persons appeared in opposition: J.B. Sandlin, 5137 Davis Boulevard; Bill
Pasteur, 2275 Westpark Court, Euless; Steve Hines, Builder; and James Stone, Builder.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing.
*20.
PU 91-01 APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 91-02
AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF BUNKER SUITS
APPROVED
*21.
PU 91-02 AWARD OF BID FOR ANIMAL TRANSPORT UNIT
APPROVED
*22.
PW 91-01 APPROVE PROPOSAL FOR COMPLETION OF
CARSTON COURT ADDITION DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
January 14, 1991
Page 6
*23.
PW 91-02 APPROVE CONTRACT FOR ENHANCEMENT STUDY
FOR DAVIS BOULEVARD (FM 1938) FROM EMERALD HILLS
WAY TO STARNES/RUMFIELD ROAD
APPROVED
24.
CITIZENS PRESENTATION
Mr. Ronnie Newman, 7112 Douglas and Mr. Ron Somtherman, 7725 Deaver, appeared
before the Council expressing their displeasure on recycling and felt the citizens should
not be charged for it.
Mr. Marlin Miller, 5109 Susan Lee Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Miller
questioned why the Council did not have the pledge of allegiance before the meeting.
Mr. Miller also had questions pertaining to landfill fees, water fees, and sewer fees.
Staff explained the recycling program.
Mr. Miller was advised Council would consider doing the pledge of allegiance.
Mr. H.L. Moody, 7116 Harwick, appeared before the Council and spoke against the
recycling.
Mr. Robert Parson, 5304 Topper, opposed the $2.00 charge, but was not against the
recycling.
Mr. Mike McGee, 7900 Whispering Woods, stated he was basically for recycling but
against the open containers.
Mr. Charles Teague, 7405 Springlea, spoke against the recycling.
Mr. Teague lodged complaints against the Police Department.
Councilmen Welch, Scoma and Sibbet answered the citizens questions and explained the
justification for recycling.
Councilman Welch expressed his desire for any money received by the City for recycling
go for benefits for the senior citizens.
Mayor Brown reminded the Council of the Town Hall Meeting January 22nd at 7:30
p.m. at the Recreation Center.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
25.
ADJOURNMENT
January 14, 1991
Page 7
Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to adjourn the meeting.
Motion carried 4-0.
Tommy Brown - Mayor
A TIEST:
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I"
~
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS LIBRARY BOARD
MINUTES
January 17, 1991
The North Richland Hills Library Board met in the board room of
the library on January 17, at 7 p.m. Present were Polly
Brinkley, Jan Daniels, Jay Bradshaw, Brenda Cody, Clyde Zellers,
Alisa Wood, Kay Schmidt, Shirley Goolsby, Betty Russell, Mignon
Morse and Brenda Lewis.
The Board accompanied Assistant Library Director of Public
Services Mignon Morse on a tour of the Adult Learning Center.
Hazel Lowrance, coordinator of the Adult Learning Center, spoke
with the group as they visited the classes that were in session.
Chairman Jan Daniels called the meeting to order; Clyde Zellers
moved and Polly Brinkley seconded, motion carried to approve the
minutes of the October 18, 1990 meeting as written.
The director's report was presented by Assistant Director of
Technical Services Betty Russell. Director Arlita Hallam was
unable to attend the meeting because of illness. Betty shared
the following library information with members:
Equipment has been ordered and the programming is underway
for the bar-coding project. Relabeling of all materials
will be necessary.
As part of the city's Emergency operations Plan, the library
is responsible for shelter and mass care in case of a
hazardous situation. Arlita will be accessing the local
facilities and working on coordinating arrangements for
their use as needed.
Mignon Morse, Hazel Lowrance, and Charlotte Cooke will be
attending a Literacy Tutor Training program at Port Aransas
on February 6-9. Transportation and registration fees are
provided by the Laubach Literacy Action.
The city will be updating the telephone system within the
next two months. All numbers will change. We hope to have
the new numbers by the end of January.
Betty reviewed the major accomplishments of the past year.
The library circulated 334,313 library materials; answered 54,247
reference questions; and registered 4,307 new patrons in 1990.
The board will review the draft of a program survey for the
library and the parks and recreation center that will be included
in the city newsletter in April or May.
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
2
NRH Library Board
The review and update of the Plan of Service was postponed until
February.
Jan Daniels reported on the Texas Conference on Library and
Information Services in Austin that she and Arlita attended
January 4 and 5. Twenty-five resolutions in the areas of
democracy, literacy and productivity were prepared to present at
the White House Conference in July. Nine delegates and
alternates from the North Texas area were among the 32 state
delegates and 32 alternates selected to attend the conference in
Washington. Henry Cisneros and Kent Caperton were among the
excellent speakers at the conference.
Discussion followed on the need for young adult programming at
the library. Some of the ideas presented were after-school films
and videos, homework peer tutoring, adult education tutoring,
and workshops. Shirley Goolsby suggested that the library offer
audiovisual equipment for the use of students in preparing their
assignments and projects. Clyde Zellers moved and Polly Brinkley
seconded that a committee of BISD school librarians Shirley
Goolsby and Brenda Cody be appointed to explore the feasibility
of this type of program, particularly geared for the middle-
school age student. Shirley and Brenda agreed to work together
on possible ideas.
The next regular meeting was scheduled for February 21.
Clyde Zellers moved to adjourn; Alisa Wood seconded; motion
carried. This meeting adjourned at 9:10.
Brenda Lewis
Date Approved:
Board Chairman:
Attested by:
I"
I Department:
_Ubject:
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Community Development
1/28/91
Request of Amstar Properties, Inc. for
Council Meeting Date:
PS 90-33
Agenda Number:
Final Plat of Lot 6R & 7, Block 1, North
Edgely Addition. This property is located
on the west side of Edison Drive.
Amstar Properties is the owner of a small commeLci~l tract or land located on the west
side of Edison Drive. The property contains an office structu~:e currently occupied by
the Texas Department of Human Resources and t}ley a'?(e needing to expand the building and
the parking lot. However, the existing platted :ot is not lar(~e enough to accommodate
the proposed building expansion. The OWl:ers havl~ ~ubmitted a Final Plat for a two lot
subdivision which involves a replat and enlargem~nt of Lot 6 dnd establishes Lot number
7 for future development.
A notation has been placed on the plat to require water and sewer improvements prior to
the issuance of any building permits on ~ot 7. The Planning and Zoning Commission at
their January 10, 1991 meeting also recomrn?nded ~hat the owner properly close the end of
Deville Drive with a curb.
F.ECOMMENDATION:
~It is recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of the Planning and
~Zoning Commission.
I
I
I Source of Funds:
I Bonds (GO/Rev.)
~ Operating Budget
~ Other
"6
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
-
,.tI
. Finance Director
rtment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of 1
~7 ~~ \ ::)\tJ:::L~~/ ~y ~w--.=___~~~ ~~ ;:: R-7-MF
\ \ - ~ ; ~ ..A--.[ .0 E3- - - ~ 0
~ \ f\ . 2 \ - ~ J. '- ~ ~ ~ R= ~ ~ = ..Q
~. \ FI? \ -.. .r.ðW.I J ~ ~R-7-MF I II 0"
· .,. ~ ',' · \ :r \ ~t±::J [o-!. . v n ~"'6-T II ~ t'y9
I~ '~ll )...(1 LItJ !)-: ~ ~U I I _U...!!.£; it -2 ~ 11 ~ - C 1
M~Ç\"~.. '~~ I T ~"HOLIDA. r:r 5 I Cš5~ Š II!II . ~ · ----.t::1 Œ :: :;:; .....11 -
~ Th~~ ~ !r~ - "EIGHTS i * 2 t HI j H rntE ~
I _ ~"E M~..Jß.l. ~..Y" . , (/ . i M"~ flUI, t I _ _ _ ..~ I -ltJ h I II I '1'ë: I Þ
~ I '"",' J I i" 1r~J" ~rLtl: ". 1 D. I" 1~6~u .... : =I!H I I I !!"" "Ii C-I ~~
CHlANO.J -L \ I 11.1 I - - : ,- ,- ~ ~
HIGH L ~"'~~ I ~ 1.\ \1 1 ì 1 1 ~ IV' 1 ~ ~~~ml $-~~C-I c-
SCHOOL I I"',·t I ""- ::J - L- -r r~ ~ __ 33~
r..tN~ ~ ~I.r r:l', J- RR --r-"l ,-, ~ L- ~I ~ ~~ - ~mi:--< / _ --
~ U --, ~-L...; '-I]~ _.d I ~I ~ - __ I ~
a:I ~ l / ~I~ -16r ld ~ -1 ~~ ~ -4~--4 ~ ~ = - I - ~ I C-I
I I -...t" l1li --1 --~ .......- ~ - I i -~-1 I I~ ? -i~ -
~ -+- - ~:j¡ \ ll~;::: J:1-~ ~ ~~B - _ L_ I ."UL lTh"~~ -V U"
~ >--+- ~ ==rei . 6-J f\L~¡S JI;: _ ~ _~! J ~rn tj Cf2:~:J \ I R.~ I I ¡ I : flJ:VXJ\-r C
............... 0---- H Vn ~~t---r ~'P ,n, LD ....- ['] ~ r::::J.,J U
c~ '1': ~ ~\~ '. ~. _1- ~ ~ :=~ r- 1--- .U[]IJ LlØ. ~rt ~Á~~ --,- ~= =:=
~ t'~ ,...... ,:.:; C~ ill T ! ~ . f-"'- ~ ..
~ -;:::=~ $~, .ll~ Ft \ ! ~.._. ~ ~ _>- ~~,rr LA ~- c-' --..... _ ~ ~
11 - __1~4~" .. H~~Ú '=;=:= ~ !I - R-7-MF . '/1 ~= == ~- =
~ fìZ .... u...... ,Hr::H - >-->- - PO >-1 >-..... = r - I
~ I T I = '0'~.:C r ,~ \ t~·_~- ; ~5~ ~t2 1.. ë-,s~.~ -. ~~~ [::= :=:=J >--- -
~J I::: ::::::: ' ~ ' ~?-t~ . ) ~-?7 :=--=-;:::.:;~ = , L---: ';; \c{< -,0 ~ - ~II"' :w--
h T . ' ..- ~~ ..- ... LR S U 4Þ: ~(e-I ~~
-----. ~""L 1 JIll - P S U -~:¡¡ -!.I _ (
- ~........- - L- Jt.'Y::::;:::1 t- E~ - c- . . *" c;: ;;,;. a ~ - ~ (
~ ..l.....l I-- ~ r- 5 U I So\HW.., rr ~
Ja _10.- ~Rl-- I., ,l\f rTT"T j M: <- i \ C-.L I 1 ~
fIT] r-- J I I I I I I I I I L R SU ~ \ MUOIMJRS S .~~- 1211 I O~-I ,,' LlC.U~' ..~Ý'
~ ! I II Llt:::! 1= , LR . ~ 4-1 I. .,- r:~;.:. . ~ tIoT..i~. l 'Z~ ~' C·2..b
~ ' ~""ìT I;:::: ;= '..... í ~'\f , s.u , C 2 G-I'o "- I "'C-IS l
~ ~ ~ ~J;zj - ~Ì'-...' ,.~ ,_ HIGk_.. CR C-I..;/· SU ~C-I
-:. 4 t 11 -~ I '\ ~p , ¥ S U .. SUo "" SUe
_4--.-"'0.-- . /'" ~i .~.... 820
. ' /BV ~ ~~ - ~
llmÀ~ . ~ ::: .~@~:.. '~'.,.'
- m-rm ï¡\~\ r ~.-"'"!), '.V
,N'" 'J /H ~:I: / / ~ JC-I.
. 1 ! ~¡ ->-- ::',,/ ~c:;: - Q ~N
.". \ ..~ 11 J I C - ~Þf
~ I i" I.'''...l i " .,; -1ft¡ :1
~ III ~0 I~·
¡j~ LR ~~I
~IÞ~ I 289 ŠR l' --- :¡
~ r i~1
i 1- I-l ~:/ ~C-2 ! I I~ ""rf 0
7- JrY« SU g .; ~
I I ~~~ 1619 ~ ~ · ~
I~ ~ t
I I
Ie
I
, ! ,f~·
~ AI~.M.~ " ~
\ ' , tI~'''' D/'. ~
\ \ ~ ..' CHRYSLU C- 2
\l1 >-- ~-
" " ,
", -;~, C-I ":' ~ PO./'\
- ~\', p.~ ~ ,: ==~ U \
SA..... . HA II \', .r·
~ \ :~'
O 1~IR(r d~: _ A¡:-....-
. , I~ -, ~ µ~ -
I I5 -~ .....-
.~ n ~ __ --~ -
" ~5i: ~ _ _~ _ R-7-MF
\ \ \ \ ~ -; == -- ~ ,tof:;
: \ \ f-
~,\ ~ -
\. " 1 I I ~
DNN
- '.......- ~.~ I 1.,;:-"2 ;; ~1~ I~ · I
\." 1: , ' 1 ' .~.. LR
- c~~ I ê9 ¡- ~~- - ~ ~ISU.
~~·I 14 I i 1216 "-
III " "'"Yo"~ I I
C-2 ~o l I
C-I FP FP
C-2S
327
a
u
II
ç
~
-
C\
~
~
..
I.)
. ~~:~:.r.:.. -; .........
t j ~
- . __~._-'r, LA.-
.~....£.- _ ,.-.. ;."i..~-".~",: J.~ ~:'.~ _ ..
7, .
. '
_. f.... ~
.. . .....
...':'::'':'~-''-
c..
~
f¥' v'.l
~ ~o "/O~
4
~
~
X
ü
..._._ - 40
~ ...... - ...... .
.-. '", ~t~~~~~~· .,> '. ~
".....~ .. .-»;,...~..;...
......._ .,,- ,~..3L.' _~_ ;,. - ..::~_ '~~,~
., J-:..../
I
I
Ie
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
JANUARY 10, 1991 - 7:30 P. M.
I
I
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order
Chairman Mark Wood at 7:30 P
I
ROLL CALL
I
I
Dir. Community Dev.
Building Official
p & Z Coordinator
Mark Wood
James Brock
David Barfield
Don Bowen
Don Collins
Pat Marin
Barry LeBaron
Steve Pence
Wanda Calvert
I
ABSENT:
Ron Lueck
TION OF THE MINUTES
ECEMBER 13, 1990
Mr. Collins made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. This motion
was seconded by Ms. Marin and the
motion carried 6-0.
I
I
1 . PS 90-33
Request of Arnstar Properties for Final
Plat of Lots 6R & 7, Block 1, North
Edgly Addition. This property is
located on Edison Drive.
I
Johnny Campbell came forward to
represent Amstar.
I
Mr. Barfield stated that Deville
Street dead ends into this property
and at the present, it has a barricade
there. He said he would like to see
the street properly closed with a
curb.
I
I
Mr. Campbell stated they plan to do
that and take care of the drainage
when they develop Lot 7.
I
I
Ie
I
Mr. Collins asked what happens to the
drainage until that time.
Mr. Campbell said they will accept
whatever water goes across the
property.
I Page 2
p & Z Minutes
I January 10, 1991
I_ PS 90-33
. APPROVED
I
I
I ..--...
2. PS 90-36
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Barfield made the motion to
approve PS 90-33 with the stipulation
that the plat be marked that Deville
Street be properly closed and the
drainage fixed prior to the
development of Lot 7. This moti~n was
seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion
carried 6-0.
.:!"~~..
Public Hearing for request of
Resolution Trust Corporation for
Replat of Lots R17A & R17B, Block 34~
Holiday West Addition, Section A In
one lot, Lot R17A-1. This proper
located at 5721 and 5723 Westc e
Drive.
Chairman Wood opened the ublic
Hearing and called for nyone wishing
to speak in his replat to
please come
Jim Anderson, ealtor, came forward to
olution Trust
He said they have this
couple at has wanted to purchase
this roperty since early September.
aid they did not know it was
atted separately. Mr. Anderson said
if it is platted separately, they
would have to pay a 30 percent down
payment. He said since it is platted
in two lots, they would have to pay
for everything twice.
Mr. Anderson said in the Engineer's
comments, it said they would have to
have sidewalks, but there are
sidewalks already there.
Chairman Wood stated that the zoning
R-4-SD is to allow separate ownership
of the duplex and if they ever wish to
sell off one side, they will have to
come back and replat it into two lots.
Mr. Anderson said the couple
understands that.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
..
SUBDIVISION FACT SHEET
AND CHECK LIST
PS NO. 90-33
DATE: 11/13/90
NAME SUBDIVISION: North Edgeley
APPLICANT: Amstar Properties. Ltd.
ENGINEER: Walter J. Nelson & Associates
COUNTY FILING DATA: Replat
70~ING: C-2
FLOOD PlAIN: YES NO
~P;MBER OF LOTS: 1
CHECK LIST
APPROVED
1. ~ Utilities
2. ~ Streets
3. ~ Drainage
4. _____ Screening Fences
s. ~ Street Lighting
6. -!!á-CLOMR
I
7. Iv" /,A- LOMR
8. ¡VIA Street Signs
9. V Sidewalks
10. ~ Maintenance Bond
11. ~ Other
~
~
~
;~~(:'~;:;~~~~':;'·~L4~jff.~
SPECIAL CONDITIONS SET BY COUNCIL
_APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
Comments:
PUBLIC WOlUCS
BY: ~--.:- ~ATE: 1.:2-.z¿-9p
~~~
~ ::iE--' .
PLANNING
BY:
DATE:
:-:;'l. ::. .
~-t --- -.: :~::': ~:.,
.... ::_-:-..~.~;~~
I
I fl.epartment:
I Subject:
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Community Development
1/28/91
Council Meeting Date:
PS 90-36
Agenda Number:
Request of Resolution Trust Corporation for
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Replat of Lot R17A-1, Block 34, Holiday West
Addition, Section A. This property is located
at 5721 & 5723 Westchase Drive.
The Resolution Trust Corporation is requesting a replat of Lots R17A and R17B, Block 34,
Holiday West Addition, into a single 10t. The lets are zoned R-4-SD (Duplex) and
contain an existing duplex structure. The RTC is rt~questing the replat to allow for a
private sale to an individual. The RTC is treating the property as two properties and
will require the new owner to have ~~~ down payment;3 to purchase the property in its
present configuration. By replatting L~C property into a single lot, the RTC can
transfer title much easier.
The plat has been revised to incorporate all staff comments.
are being proposed for this plat.
No additional requirements
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
1- Other ¿
~~ ß~
I Dep~ent Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~
!2~
I City Ma ager
, Finance Director
Pae10f 1
~
\~
~
l 17 I ~
L'ñ..1.J;JJ "-,"'i1
\';:, ;1~~ ., ~Ih
~o/ " I: I .\ r r T Tlun ~, t:.1 ~u.~.~
Ë:: !=~ ~ ' "1\ _ r I I .
>- =:~ t:: >- >->- ,-+-- >- ,\ f >- _ .11.1'.l 1 I I, D
:;¡¡o . -'=: t::: >- >>->- >r- ¡-.;::::-¡..... R 7L ._ - .....,.. .,CI ... .. ""ODD .
~ ----.. ~ ;>-->->- tE"~ J~" j>- C-I · .~LilJTT I ~~~~ ~g;.
~2fue i~,·~H~.~¡~>- " · .. :I§ 'I - í~=ê
-.._~ L...J:::: - 0 tB u:.: > '- '- := .
'I - 25U· ........ ~ t.1L¡g r=::,O~~ I I J : b :=
m '~I'R16 '- -. - .~ L J ~-1. . ::::: J-..--
~-7- M F " ~ --n.........T: ::: þ
- ~ ,;>->- ~ f r - ,0- ~
C-I ~
IfC-2 !C-I __--.
I, 'Iii: tif T linT I' T ...... ,..... - ""7" ' 'tI r I T" ~,I J ! T T \ ' EP'\..Jt
_~C-I >-If I III f 7 !R-7'Æ..:~ I 1
I:f :: u· := - .... ~ ~ ~ <II!!.... , ""'Mf" . \....--\ - I I
çõ~>-- ,~~R-7-MF t: Io:=~ C-I':=¡ \v ~__
h.,., --n .,.0 ~................ __ ........>- :: ........ ~
~,-,. ,,",' ................ ........>- ................ ................ ........ ...", ~ D' yo
~,.... ....- ':...1 ..'II~ .--1-- -I-- ~~"---- -~If--~ .,,~ , "-~...é"
1097 >- .>-........ --........ .............. ........- -........ ........:- , !r ~
~ .t;-~SU. ~I~~,:: ~- --.'::~=~r::::: L---: :, \ O"':......L
Ii 12 >-- S .IA\-"'i'-:::.. III...... v \ > \ __¡:¡ I~
~S::::'- ,~\G'''':~'::::'''''1l ~~...., \ ~¡, ~ ~ ~CL
¡c:;~,., ~ ~ ~ _ ""',-.U.'R:IlJ ~ I ~ ~cr::
C-2 ~ì = ~ü2; C ~ ~ /. tx;rn~~'~i.'_' ~'-~~t.HOuoa. ~ I I
C-2 1130 ~~~~ ~ "'-.L, c.:.~ \" § / =i\~¡- HI'.HTS r
C -4:bd I ......... V 1...._- ~ , -(I ~ r I ~ ; , ,1\ r I >- <L'.. ¡
~ u· V- ~ :1 f\~ · .,CHL... >-4 I TI \. . ,ur '.0' . ..... _
1621~ I -- i ~ ,..7...F I ':~::L J ~~ t L_' /1"'; " r '
~ I I ...-- I I ~r" I ~ '\..1 1.....1
.....--:. ~ ') I~ .-----rL ,.... .' . U -~ ~ 'If i.J I ~ ::
!- ) ........ --............. t:a.a..i:.-.tß. r ~ ~ IIiU iti II!! ~ ~ ~I- _
- LR S U * -- . ~" ~ ~.U .....
.. .2-!'.~J~;89_ 'QAQ....... .... ..~~~....,~~. ... . ...""'^~"~;.. p... ¡~>-~~_.. . ..J:j~\:;..~
. .r.l~.w,,~~R.¡ . ___
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
I
I
I
Ie
. I I I I I I I I
I .'
~it'
I~
T .~~..
-L~þ-
I-
I
...
LR· ~-~... 11-~~ i---~ T r r , , , J t--{ J--.l ,
SUI* O· t1~-_ =;:: ~r IT T e1D
~" >--- c... ~ ....... u
~j-I ~.§§ ~BO ~~\
i-- ---./) II r fjj¡~1 ~~ ,
Þ- J J.. -- r I ,
~ ;::::::::: ~ Ow,", It:ACI
~ ~ T ~
- ~~- II '-[3 'lif::J n_ ~~.
· 1 I .J~7 J
~ 1 ., I~"'. Of U'I' I r
~ r [I I ÎeL --c ~J T ,
-, ~ '--I r f _ ]
\
~ p >~... '-~~~ -;....~ '7 ~.. fì t::: ~
- v ~~ =7,. ~ ~ ~ f-
- ~I~ 1'· ~tr ¿..... ~··~s~:::: ~I-
,.., ). "........ ~ rt: 'm
,,\;0 I. .,. . I-- ¡lit--
= -=~ .....~.lßfJVI"" ;g. .n
~ I C-2 c-z I \
- C-I 1116 1176 , \
- 'Ut _ \ AG \ AG
/~ C-J~ ~':' R-7-MF J< ~ í"1:.- AG \F.P. \
J ~ ~~ 1~6i;1:'" ' \
> a.:::..,. C- -sU. ~
.... 1214
.
: ~ï\I ~
I ~
, ì r
/ ~
/ _l1j~
/ ...= ~ [f;[t~/[¡
, I-- ~ ' ¡--.,:.
, ~ I--~ II r
,,~ ~ I--~ I I I
," ~' ~/~-.a
~ 'I
,
" - ...
~" ..i
~
I
,
,
\
'\.
--
.-
1
í
j
I r I~ fiiiMfi 1
I ~ ! ..1.1 \ r r ì
i4'''ftll \ \" 1
I T \.~I¡~~
J t\\ tf
r I I J..T ~ CT
~~ ~ -¿
1 t ~ w~~ þ~ J ~
::: ~ ~I ~ ~ 1 r
1 Ë ~~ --.. Pf" f=rì
c l~
~~a~
WATAUGA
F:F?
'1(1'1711.
~
FiT, I
I
R-7-
\ M F-'i1
\ /
\
_ --=:6
~--
u
: ~ STMDUIT- ¡.~ 2
- n=~"o':J4'4
0:/; I ~\
...... t"""
r'.
~~
ot>-
\ c;.
J'"
.~Q
... " , '
~
'.O"'TItIAL
~.It. -..IIA
J. C
v·
'\. J./A
--,
Ç/
~'
~-
,,~ · f--
..'
,,>A...
Q')
,+.
~'f.
Þ- \
~
C-2 rrl
i T
-,
......
-
1--1--
I--~
I Page 2
P & Z Minutes
I January 10, 1991
l!t PS 90-33
I APPROVED
I
I 2. PS 90-36
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Mr. Barfield made the motion
approve PS 90-33 wi stipulation
that the marked that Deville
S e properly closed and the
drainage fixed prior to the
dpvelopment of Lot 7. This motion was
seconQ~d by Mr. Bowen and the motion
carried 6-0.
"'.ã. .............. ....
P1~t 1.~ c Hearing for request of
Rt~solution Trust Corporation for
Feplat of Lots R17A & R17B, Block 34,
HOLLaay West Addition, Section A into
one lot, Lot R17A-1. This property is
located at 5721 and 5723 Westchase
Drive.
Chairman Wood opened the Public
Hearing and called for anyone wishing
to speak in favor of this replat to
please come forward.
Jim Anderson, Realtor, came forward to
represent Resolution Trust
Corporation. He said they have this
couple that has wanted to purchase
this property since early September.
He said they did not know it was
platted separately. Mr. Anderson said
if it is platted separately, they
would have to pay a 30 percent down
payment. He said since it is platted
in two lots, they would have to pay
for everything twice.
Mr. Anderson said in the Engineer's
comments, it said they would have to
have sidewalks, but there are
sidewalks already there.
Chairman Wood stated that the zoning
R-4-SD is to allow separate ownership
of the duplex and if they ever wish to
sell off one side, they will have to
come back and replat it into two lots.
Mr. Anderson said the couple
understands that.
I
I
l!t
I
I
I
..".
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
January 10, 1991
PS 90-36
APPROVED
3.
PS 90-38
Chairman Wood called for anyone
wishing to speak in opposition to this
replat to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the 'P11blic
Hearing.
Mr. Brock made the mctin:i to approve
PS 90-36. This motion w~s s~conded by
Ms. Marin and the motior ca.rl'ied 6-0.
Public Hearing for consideration of
revisions to the Master Thoroughfare
Plan regarding Watauga Road, Rumf d
Road and Bursey Road.
Chairman Wood stated that
extension of Watauga Road
Boulevard to Precinct
City Council has ado ed the
realignment to a s aight route and the
Planning and Zon g Commission
recommends th ame.
stated that the existing
Road, which is an M4U, shows
up to Kirk Road. He said the
PI ing and Zoning Commission
commends it go due east and curve
down to Precinct Line Road next to the
County Barn. Chairman Wood said the
City of Hurst is looking at several
options on their side of Precinct Line
Road, but P & Z hopes we can connect
this road to Glade Road.
Chairman Wood stated that the map
shows Wilson Road currently coming
down from Tarrant Parkway to Davis
Boulevard and Bursey Road coming from
Davis Boulevard east. He said the
Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends to put it back the way it
was prior to the last revision to
eliminate cost and keep the city from
having to buy so much land. This
would have Bursey Road intersecting
Davis Boulevard on the east at Wilson
Road.
I
I City of JXòrth Richland Hills
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
°1
I
I
Ie
I
December 24, 1990
Ref: PWM 90-150
MEMO TO: Plar.nJn£ and Zoning Conunission
FROM: Jonn A. Johnston, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: PS 90-36, HOLIDAY WEST SECTION A
Lot 17A-l, Block 34
Replat
We have reviewed the subject plat received in our office November 30, 1990 and
offer the following comments.
1.
The surveyor should sign the replat.
2.
The work "Preliminary" should be removed from the title of the plat.
3 .
The attached easement dedication should be incorporated into the owners
dedication..
4.
The existing 5-foot utility easement along the rear property line should
be increased to a minimum 7.5-foot in width.
5.
The existing 2.5-foot utility easement along the side property line
should be increased to a minimum of 7.5-foot in width.
6.
The current zoning and ownership of surrounding property should be shown
on the replat.
7 .
Sidewalks should be required to meet the current zoning and building
ordinances.
The marked-up replat should be given to the surveyor and should be returned
with the next submittal.
cc: Gregory W. Dickens, Director of Public Works/utilities
Barry LeBaron, Director of Community Development
(817) 281-0041
· 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180
I ~
I Department:
I .ubject:
I
I, Mr. Paul Miller has been nominated as alternate.
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Administration Council Meeting Date: 1/28/91
Appointment to Planning and Zoning Commission
and Capital Improvement Advisory Committee Agenda Number: GN 91-06
Mr. George Angle, Alternate on the Planning and Zoning Commission and the
Capital Improvements Advisory Committee, has been appointed to the Cable T.V.
Board.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that Council appoint Mr. Paul Mi~1 le-r.:- c.lS Al tern.:ite to the
Plann.'Lng and Zoning Commission and the Capital Improvemen.t,s Advisory Committee.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
_ Operating Budget _"
1- Other,.. ¡J ---:--: ¡ç A ï~/ ,
~~?ZV~ ~~
I: Department Head Signature . City anager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
I_
I
Ie
NAME
I
I
I
I
I
I
le·./
I
I
I
I
I
I
I A~5lFr
Ie
I
Date Received:
Received By:
PROFILE FOR PROSPECTIVE COMMISSION MEMBERS
PAV¿,
W. µ 1I-i,éR-
ADDRESS
1tfz,tJ
SfiA DY H () L.i-O W
C í. I }J , ¡Z.. ¡J,
EMPLOYER
A Q()A-rEC.H Pool.,5. /¡Vc.
NUÞ1BER OF
YEARS
(Q
OCCUPATION
/Z.é ~, Þ é tV -r , A L / ~ (; M M ¿ f"L c I /~ L - . S WI M I \.A I µ 6
P::JOL
c. oµ -r (L.J1'-í 0 fl-
PHONE:
HOME
(õ/7) 6)"Joo 5vlb
OFFICE
(8/7) Hi, ¿çotf
WIFE'S/HUSBAND'S NÞ~S
;"0 D I ,-.
1"'1 ILL ~ : t2-
CHILDREN'S NAME ANL· Ar"";ES
/vI ;l -r 7 ¡.I ,:- ~_.
3
C f1' £2_1 S - - ( A tV
~
{;..J & € ¡L. S
RESIDENT OF THE CITY
5 7~·¡CL
/ c¡ ~b
PREVIOUS RESIDENCE
I AM INTERESTED ·IN SERVING~ON:
(CHECK ONE OR MORE)
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
PARKS/RECREATION BOARD
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
BOARD OF APPEALS
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
LIBRARY BOARD
CABLE TV BOARD
. -
BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
MEMBERSHIPS, ORGANIZATIONS AND PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE ON CITY CO!1MISSION:
Bv 1.è-eJ t ¡..; ()
C- OM AI( . -rrE6 , ¡u U. {=o ¡t..T &rIJ (J (l..~,"" ß A P-r, ~-r
C.-'..f v (2 C-H
COMMENT (ABOUT YOURSELF, SPECIAL AREAS OF INTEREST, WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE,
QUALIFICATIONS AND OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION.)
.I
¡JAVE
ßé€I" A
P /l-ðuí)
C. t -r { -Zé'" tJl': ¡J O/l-ør,J
(Z,1. C-H tJj.1J /) {./ it_L S F (,}fl-
ref 'ýéAf?-S
A,vO ~
1t,J I,.J 1<..
""...¡
Be(¡Jú
A-PPo I J-r ED
-1'0
-(1-*
PLAw ~.,.J ~
A"'''>
Z,c,.J ( OJ" C-oM ~ t S.{(~".I
COv~i)
&:?
A 6rz.¿A-r
--(Q
"1" ~~
F" "(vft.E o~
OV~
e,I-ry.
I
I Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 1/28/91
I eUbject: ApQointments to Beautification Commission Agenda Number: GN 91-07
Mr. Kenneth Franklin has moved out of the City therefore creating a vacancy in
Place 3 on the Beautification Commission.
CITY OF .
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
It has been suggested that Mr. Rusty Moore, presently serving as Alternate, be
appointed to Place 3. Mr. Jprome Taylor has been nominated to serve as
Alternate.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that Council ~~point Mr. Rusty Moore to Place 3 and Mr.
Jerome Taylor as Alternate on the Baautification Commission.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Sufficient Funds Available
I e gf~;~ting Budget -:- ~
Cf-~Æ ~~µ~ ) 12//1( .~
I :/ - Depártment Head Signature I City' ãnager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
I,
I Department:
I*Ubject:
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Parks and Recreation Department . Council Meeting Date: 1-28-91
Public Hearing - Community Development Block
Grant - Resolution No. 91-03 Agenda Number: GN 91-08
The purpose of this Public Hearing is to receive citizen input
regarding needs of our low to moderate income neighborhoods. All
citizens, groups and organizations of our City are welcome to
participate and be represented in the formulation of the 17th year
plan. This Public Hearing is open for public advice, comments,
complaints, questions or presentations ~f ait~rnative proposals.
The public may present their views in writing by obtaining a
questionnaire from the City Secretary, c~mrlata it and return it to
her office.
Based on discussions with the County Staff cor.cerning eligible CDBG
Projects within our c~ty, it is recommende~ that the 17th year
entitlement be allocated to the replacement and improvement of the
Senior citizen Center parking lot at 6801 Glenview Drive. This
project will compliment the 16th year entitlement currently allocated
for the conversion of the Glenview Facility into a Senior citizens
Center this year. The amount of money is unknown at this time as the
County ranking process takes place in March.
Recommendation:
e
The Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution to submit
the Senior citizen Center Parking Lot Project for the community·
Development Block Grant Funding for the 17th year.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
Operating Budget
eOthe~~ e Ifl/~
Department Head Signature I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
RESOLUTION NO. 91-03
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ENDORSING THE 1992 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills shares in a
cooperative agreement with Tarrant County for essential community
development assistance activities under Public Law 93-383, the
Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended; and
WHEREAS, at least one public hearing for the purpose of
identifying and discussing community .ievelopment needs, and receiving
and adopting Community Development Project~s, have been duly held by
the City of North Richland Hills; an~
WHEREAS, after said public hearing and due consideration, the
replacement and improvement of the Senior Center parking lot was
eligible for funding under this Act, and approved the filing of
application for said funding; and
WHEREAS, it is understood that any funds not expended on the
specifically approved project will revert to the Community
Development Contingency Fund, and should any repayment of funds be
required by HUD due to ineligible or non-fundable projects, the City
would be responsible for repayment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city
of North Richland Hills that said 1991 Community Development Project
for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas be approved and endorsed.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 28th day of January, 1991.
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY;
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
SUbject:
Property Tax Refund
1/28/91
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: GN 91-09
Department:
Finance
The Texas Property Tax Code section 31.11 (a) requires that refunds over $500
be approved by the governing body. The following refund request has been
received.
Taxpayer
Amount
Reason for Refund
College Circle
Property
$2,158.58
172.69
$2,331.27
1989 Refund-Litigation resolved
Interest-Tax Code Sect 42. 43 (b)
Total Refund Plus Interest
Recommendation:
The tax office recommends approval of the refund as outlined above.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
~ 711~~,~
Department Head Signàture
CITY CO.UNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of 1
I rnTYOF
I NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Department: Budget Council Meeting Date: 1/28/91
I ~ Presentation of Fiscal Year 1989-90 Comprehensive
Wl'ubject: Annual Financial Report Agenda Number: GN 91-10
~
I Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
._ Operating B. udget
WI' Ot e D
,
.
I
I
I
I
¡
ì
I
I
I
I
Ie
.
The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for fiscal year ended
September 30, 1990 has been presented to City Council for their
review. Mr. Clyde Womack, Partner with KPMG Peat Mar~Tick will make
the formal presentation and answer any questions cOùcerning the
report.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report be
accepted as presented.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Availa
. Fmance Director
~
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I
I Department: Public Works/utilities
~ Water & Sewer System Extenslon and
I ~ubject: Assessment Policy - Ordinance No. 1 707
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
a Operating Budget
1_ Oth r
I
I
I
I
e
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Council Meeting Date: 1/28/91
Agenda Number: GN 91-11
As directed by the CIP Committee at the August 16, 1990 meeting, we have prepared an
ordinance that revises the subject policy as it exists in Section V of Ordinance No.
381. The proposed Ordinance has been revised per comments received at the CIP Meeting
on November 20, 1990. A copy of the proposed ordinance is attached.
The main poiLts of the proposei ordinance are as follows:
1. How pro;cctc: can be initiated by customers or staff.
2. ASS8ssments against ben8fitted properties will be 90% of the cost. Other ~i~:ies
w€:re survE:~yed and the -~·esul ts are attached.
3. The assessments ure apportioned by lot frontage on the street no matter where
:ines are located.
4.
Asses~~~llt hearing procedure, etc. will be in accordance with Local Government
Code, Title 13, Subtitle A., Chapter 402, Subchapter D.
5.
Interest on assessments will be 10% annually.
6. Payment procedures and non-payment procedures.
Two companion actions are included in this agenda. The actions concern appropriating
budgets for sewer line extensions in Valley Park Estates (PW 91-04) and along Crane
Road (PW 91-05). If Council approves this policy and the two project budgets, the next
step in the assessment process will be to have a public hearing on assessments for each
project. Prior to those hearings, proper notification will be made to all property
owners as prescribed by law.
Recommendation:
The ClP Committee and staff recommend the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1707.
N/A
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/ A
Sufficient Funds Available
-
/
¡( If{~~~
ment Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
Pa e 1 of
1
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
fÞ
I
CITY
ARLINGTON
Mr. Antone Cepak
BEDFORD
Mr. Daniel Gentry
EULESS
Mr. Belton
HURST
Mr. Jim Sparks
IRVING
Mr. Dave Mullins
PLANO, GRAPEVINE ,
CARROLLTON
SEWER LINE EXTENSION
SURVEY
CURRENT POLICY
The homeowner must request the sewer extension. A
cost analysis is completed by the City. All sewer
extension re~l~~~s must be approved or disapproved
by thp City Council. If approved, the homeowner
woulã pay only the standard impact fee charge.
The City ~ssumes all o:her costs.
Bedford J0~3 not have any areas which are without
City sewer service. Per Mr. Gentry if an area did
re·~ire a sewer ext"~nsion, the homeowner would
:prL'bab.Ly be ch':irged a front foot charge based on
J the construction cost.
Ellless d0~s not have any areas without City sewer
sel~?'i~e .
Hurst does not do extensions. All costs would be
the homeowner's responsibility (engineering and
construction). The City does inspect the project
when completed.
Irving has very few areas which are without City
sewer. Their policy is that Irving pays for the
first 100 feet and homeowner pays the remainder.
Per foot cost is calculated from the actual
construction cost.
Per The Technology Resource Center, The Texas
Engineering Extension Service, July 1990 it is the
policy of these cities that the extension cost is
paid totally by the homeowner. The City does not
share expenses.
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rt
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1707
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A
METHOD OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM EXTENSIONS AND AN ASSESSMENT POLICY
IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS; PROVIDING A TITLE; DECLARING PURPOSES;
DEFINING TERMS; DESCRIBING DETERMINATION OF EXTENSION PROJECTS; ESTABLISHING
AN ASSESSMENT POLICY; DESCRIBING PAYMENT PROCEDURES; REPEALING SECTION V OF
ORDINANCE NO. 381; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIrY OF NORTH RICHLi'~ HILLS,
TEXAS:
SECTION I. GENERAL
A. TITLE
This Ordinance shall be known as the "~~ater and Sanitary Sewer System
Extension and Assessment Policy Ordinance" of the City of N0~th Richland
Hills.
B. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
This Ordinance sets forth the requirements to be followed in extending
public water and sanitary sewer lines to serve a single customer or groups of
independent single customers. The requirements under this ordinance are
specifically exclusive of extensions for residential subdivisions or
commercial developments which are covered in Section VI of Ordinance No. 381.
C. DEFINITIONS
1. "Benefitted property" means a lot or tract to which water or sewer
service is made available under this ordinance.
2. "City" means City of North Richland Hills, Texas.
3. "Cost of improvement" includes construction expense, engineering
expenses, fiscal fees, and other expenses incidental to the
construction of improvements to the water system, sewer system, or
both systems in addition to the other costs of the improvements
including acquisition of right-of-way or easements.
4. "Lien" means the right to take and sell or hold the property of a
debtor as security or payment for a debt.
5. "Sewer system improvements" means the laying of mains, laterals, and
extensions and all appliances and necessary adjuncts required for
the sanitary disposal of sewage from the area in which the
improvements are made but does not include off-site mains, laterals,
and extensions and appliances and adjuncts necessary to connect the
improvements to the existing sewer system operated by the
municipality.
1
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
It
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rt
I
Ordinance #1707
6. "Water system improvements" means the laying of a water main with
gates, tees, crosses, taps, meter boxes, manholes, or extensions,
and any other appurtenances required to furnish water for domestic
or commercial purposes to the area in which the improvements are
constructed but does not include any off-site appurtenances required
to connect the improvements to the existing water system operated by
the municipality.
SECTION II. PROJ1:~CT DETERMINATION
A. IMPROVEÞ1ENTS REQUESTED BY CUSTOMER{S)
One potent5.al customer or a group of single potential custome:r S ¡"lay
request public ',..¡ater or sanitary sewer lines be extended to serve their
p:roperty. I'neir request should be made in writing and addressed to ·:h.e City
Manager. ~ petition indicating 50% or more of the benefitted properties are
in favor 0f the project should accompany the letter of request. Th¿
perr~ntage will be based on accumulative linear foot frontage of prope:-ties ;.:'1
ravor versus total frontage benefitted. The letter of request should alöo
include the following items for each customer.
1 . Name
2 . Address
3. Telephone number
4. Lot, block, and addition or if unplatted, tract designation per
local tax maps, survey name, and abstract number.
5. Type and size of service requested.
6. Preference of service location as measured from property corner
along frontage.
Upon receipt of requests, the City Manager will have the Public
Works/Utilities Department review the request. The Public Works/Utilities
Department will prepare an estimate of cost for the water and/or the sanitary
sewer line extensions. The estimate shall include construction costs and an
allowance of ten (10%) percent of the construction cost estimate for
administrative, field survey, and contingency costs. A plan layout of the
requested improvements shall accompany the estimate and a list of the
benefitted properties with their frontage lengths. The estimate and
accompanying material shall be returned to the City Manager for presentation
to the City Council. Depending on availability of funds, the Council will
authorize or not authorize the City staff to proceed with the detail
construction plans and assessment policy requirements.
B. IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED BY CITY STAFF
The City staff can initiate projects to extend public water and/or
sanitary sewer lines under the provisions of this Ordinance when the
improvements will provide service to benefitted property and the improvements
will enhance the public health and general welfare. The same requirements as
stated in the preceding paragraph under this section will be adhered to.
2
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rt
I
Ordinance #1707
SECTION III. ASSESSMENT POLICY
A. PERCENTAGE TO BE ASSESSED BENEFITTED PROPERTY
The City Council will assess nine-tenths of the estimated cost of
improvements against the benefitted property and the owners of that property.
Any portion of the improvements which is in the "impact fee"
calculations as providing for futur~ ~evelopment will not be included in the
assessments against th~~ benefitted property.
B. APPORTIONMENT CJF AS3ESSMENTS
The City shal~_ separately compute the cost of the water or sewer
improvements and shall apportion the rart of the cost of those improvements
that may be assessed against the tenefitted property and the owners of the
property, among "the pa.rcels of t~1e benefitted property and the owners, in
accordance with the front foot rùle.
Under the front Loot rule, the City shall assess each parcel of
benefitted property according to the number of lineal feet of the parcel that
abuts on a public street, irrespective of the location of improvements
constructed under this Ordinance relating to that parcel if the improvements
provide water or sewer service to the assessed parcel. The governing body
shall assess a corner lot based on the shorter side of the lot that abuts on a
public street.
C. PROCEDURE OF ASSESSMENT
The procedure for legally assessing the benefitted properties shall be
as described in the Texas Local Government Code Title 13. WATER AND
UTILITIES, Subtitle A. Municipal Water and Utilities, Chapter 402, Subchapter
D. Any subsequent revision to this law will be adhered to from its effective
date forward.
D. LIENS
1. Notice of Improvements
If the City levies or assesses any of the cost of improvements
against the benefitted property, the City will file a notice, signed
on behalf of the City by the Mayor, with the county clerk of Tarrant
County. The notice must substantially show that the City has
determined by order, directive, or otherwise that water or sewer
system improvements are necessary, identify the required
improvements by location or otherwise, state that a portion of the
cost of the improvements is to be or has been specifically assessed
as a lien against the benefitted property, and describe that
property. One notice may contain any number of systems or
improvements.
3
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
It
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tf
I
Ordinance #1707
It is not necessary that a notice under this section give details or
be sworn to or acknowledged. The City may file the notice at any
time. The county clerk with whom the notice is filed shall record
the notice in the records of mortgages or deeds of trust and shall
index it in the name of the City and in the name or other
designation of the water or sewer system to which the notice
relates.
2. Amount and Interest Rate
An assessment against benefitted property under this section shall
be a lien collectable with interest~ ~Oðt of collection, and
reasonable attorney's fees. The asseSSi,!lent is a first and prior
lien on the assessed property a~d the lien takes effect on the date
that a notice of proposed imp~ovement'3 is made as stated in the
preceding Section II, D.1. Tne lien is superior to any other lien
or claim except a state, COU".lty, SL.hool dist_~ ict, or municipal
property tax lien. The asse:sment is a perp~nal liability and
charge against the owners of tt8 assessed property on the date on
which the lien takes effect, whet~er or not the owners are named in
a notice, instrument, certificate, or ordinance.
The City Council may prescribe an interest on the assessments not to
exceed ten (10%) percent a year. The interest on the liens shall
begin after the improvements are complete and functional and thirty
days after invoices have been mailed to all benefitted property
owners.
SECTION IV. PAYMENT PROCEDURE
A. LUMP SUM
The assessed amount can be paid any time prior to thirty days after the
invoices are mailed out without interest costs. After that time, a lump sum
payment may be made and the payment will be applied first to any interest
accumulation.
B. FIVE PAYMENT PAYOUT PLAN
Upon written request, the City will allow a benefitted property owner to
divide his assessment into five equal payments which include the "remaining
balance" interest at the rate prescribed by the City Council. The first
payment to be made within sixty days of the date the invoice was mailed. The
subsequent four payments shall be made annually on the anniversary date of the
initial payment.
c. NON-PAYMENT PROVISION
If the assessments are not paid, the City will accumulate interest at
the maximum rate by law. The lien on the property may be foreclosed upon non-
payment, by action of the governing body of the City directing foreclosure.
4
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
k,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tt
I
Ordinance #1707
SECTION V. REPEALER
-\I
That Section ~ of Ordinance No. 381 is hereby repealed as well as all
other ordinances or any parts thereof in conflict with the terms of this
ordinance shall be and hereby are deemed repealed and of no force or effect
provided that such repeal shall be only to the extent of such inconsistency
and in all other respects this ordinance shall be cumulative of other
ordinances regulating and governing the subject matter covered in this
ordinance
SECTION VI. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE
Should any portion or part of this Ordinance be held for any reaS02
invalid on ùnenforceable , the same shall not be construed to ~t;ect any other
valid portion hereof, but all valid portions hereof shall rema~n in fu~l force
and -:.f..L"ect.
SECTION VII. EFFECTIVE DATE
That this ordinance shall become effective inunediately from :':lè date of
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 28th day of January, 1991.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Tonuny Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City
5
I Department: Public Works/Utilities
~ Amendment to Ordinances No. 1679 and 1701 -
I ·Subject: Approve Additions to the Capital Improvements
Plan, Increase in Maximum Impact Fee Levels,
and Impact Fee Collection Levels - Ordinance No. 1708
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I¡e
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
CITY OF
NORTH RICH LA NO HILLS
Council Meeting Date: 1/28/91
Agenda Number:
GN 91-12
The purpose of this proposed action concerns (1) whether to "pass-through" to the new
customer water and wastewater impact fee charges which the City of Fort Worth (FW) charges
North Richland Hills (NRH) as a wholesale water and wastewater customer and (2) whether
to change the exist.i~~ 50% co~:c~tion rate for the NRH water and wastewater impact fees.
On June 11, 1990, the Ci.ty Counc.il approved adoption of Ordinance No. 1679. This
ordinance imposed #cter and waste~ater impact fees on all property in the service area
with collection beins 3t time of ap?lication for building permit. Collection to date has
been at a f~fty percent level for the NRH fees and only at a twelve and one-half perC(!nl
level for th(~ -?W waf,tewater impa..::t fee.
EYISTING IMPACT FEE
COLLECTION LEVELS
NRH
FW
Total
Water
Wastewater
$362
$112
$362
$273
$0
$161
The increase from the previously adopted maximum levels to the proposed maximum levels
shown below is based on the incorporation of the City of FW's maximum impact fee levels.
Existing NRH Maximum Proposed Maximum Total
Impact Fee Levels * Impact Fee Levels *
Water $725 $1,564 $725 (NRH) + $839 (FW)
Wastewater $224 $1,509 $224 (NRH) + $1285 (FW)
* Per 3/4-inch meter equivalent.
The proposed maximum impact fees would be increased from the levels shown on Page 2 of NRH
Ordinance No. 1679 to include levels shown on the "schedule of fees" attached to Fort
Worth's Ordinance No. 10601. Complete copies of these ordinances and the Fort Worth
Capital Improvement Plan Study are available in the Public Works Department for your
review.
The Planning and Zoning Commission serving in their capacity as the Capital Improvements
Advisory Committee (CIAC) recommends the addition of the City of FW CIP's to the NRH ClP
and the increase of the maximum impact fees that can be imposed to the levels shown in the
summary table included with the attached letter from Mark Wood, Chairman of the CIAC,
dated January 8, 1991.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number N/ A
Bonds (GO/Rev.) ---'ß.l..!i ~ Sufficient Funds Available
gp~;~ting BUdg~et _ _ ~<.."" ,
, . Tt L/~ JÑ je !¡lll/~~'~,-
epa ent ~~iqn ture èity Manager
,-,/ L--/ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
I Finance Director
Page 1 of 2
I
I 'I
I'
1
I
I
I
I
I ¡
I
I
I~
1 I
!
i
1
1
1
I
I I
I I
11
I '
The Impact Fee Steering Committee recommends the Council consider adoption of Ordinance
1\J0. 1700 ?+- 1:-rc Janu3"!'""'p ?Rt~ C::Jllnc~~ meetinc:. Thi~ ordir:2r1CP wi12 ~ccornDlish +-hn
following actions.
1. Approve addition of the Ci ty of Fort Worth Water and Wastewater Capi tal Improvements
Plan to the NRH CIP.
2 .
Assess (not collect) the total (NRH + FW) impact fees at the 100% level.
-..i .
Continue to collect the NRH irnpacL fees ?~ the 50% level until the enå or 199:.
Beginning January 1, 1992 collect ~Hrl i¡npact fee~ at the 100% level.
1 .
Collect the City of FW impact feEs at the same lev~l as FW will charge them to the
wholesale customers. These levels ut collection are as shown below.
1/1/91 through 9/30/91:
w3t,:~r 30% of assessed amount ($251.70*)
~j as: ewa tE·!· - l~.S~s of assessed amount ($161.00*)
f,'i:3 t ~?t· 35% of assessed amount ($293.65*)
V~ 2.. S Lev.: a t.. e r - ~S% of assessed amount ($449.75*)
\'Jater 40% of assessed amount ($335.60*)
\·jas t.ewater - 40% of assessed amount ($514.00*)
10/1/91 through 9/30/92:
10/1/92 through 6/5/93:
* Per 3/4-inch meter equivalent.
Recommendation:
The Impact Fee Steering Committee recommends the Council adopt Ordinance No. 1708.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS
I ./
. .~
,~-'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 1679
SECTION 3. Definitions
When used in the ordinance, these te~s shall be defined as follows:
Capital Impact Fee: A charge in addition to water and wastewater
connection charges made against the customer or property owner after
June.19, 1990 to pay a proportionate share of the total cost of water
and wastewater system improvements within the city.
Capital Improvements Plan: The water and wastewater impact fee study
capital improvements plan adopted by the City Council, as may be
a.rnended iJ:'r>m time to time.
Capital Pro Rata Fee: A charge in addition to water and wastewater
connection t::harges made against the customer or property owner prio~ tc
June 19, 19~0 to pay a proportionate share of the total cost of water
and wastewater system improvements within the city.
Ci t:,:
city of North Richland Hills, Texas
Di~ector: The Director of Public Works/Utilities for the Ci·cy of North
Richland Hills, Texas or his authorized representative.
Land Use Assumptions: The land use assumptions adopted by the City
Council upon which the capital impact fees are based.
SECTION 4. Impact Fee Schedule
A fee shall be charged against each lot or tract of land and the owner
thereof whose water and/or wastewater line shall be connected with any water
line and/or wastewater line in the city, and the fee shall be charged at the
following rates based on the water meter size:
5/8 x
Meter Size Equivalency Factor Water Wastewater Total
3/4 inch or
3/4 inch 1.00 $ 725 $ 224 $ 949
1 inch 1.67 1,211 374 1,585
1-1/4 inch 2.77 2,008 620 2,628
1-1/2 inch 3.33 2,414 746 3,160
2 inch 5.33 3,864 1,194 5,058
3 inch 10.00 7,250 2,240 9,490
4 inch 16.67 12,086 3,734 15,820
6 inch 33.33 24,164 7,466 31,630
8 inch 60.00 43,500 13,440 56,940
10 inch 96.67 70,086 21,654 91,740
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
/.
--.---......¥... .-.
CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 10601
WATER IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
MAXIMUM CHARGE PER EQUIVALENT METER
I
$839
PROPOSED 1990
METER EQUIVALENCY IMPACT
SIZE FACTOR FEE
~ ~ ~ - .. ~. ..- ----------- ------------
3/4" 1 $839.00
1" 1.75 $1,468.25
1-1/2" 4 $3,356.00
2" 7 $5,873.00
3" 16 $13,424.00
4" 28 $23,492.00
6" 64 $53,696.00
8" 100 $83,900.00
10" 150 $125,850.00
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
-- ------..- _. .~.,.-----_.....-
MASTEWATER IMPACT FEE SCH~DULE
MAXIMUM CHARGE PER EQUIVALENT METER
$1,285
METER EQUIV.ALENCY IMPACT
SIZE FAC~~R FEE
------- --------,~-- ------------
3/4" 1 $1,285.00
1" 1.75 $2,248.75
1-1/2" 4 $5,140.00
2" 7 $8,995.00
3" 16 $20,560.00
4" 28 $35,980.00
6" 64 $82,240.00
8" 100 $128,500.00
10" 150 $192,750.00
I
I _ City of J(örth Richland Hills
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
Janua:ry 8, 1991
Mayor Tommy Brown and City Council Members
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
RE: WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES;
Additions to Capital Improvements Plan and
Increase in Maximum Impact Fee Levels
Dear Mayor Brown:
On January 3, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission, serving in their
capacity as Capital ~rovements Advisory Committee (CIAC) for the Water and
Wastewater Impact Fee study, met to review the Water and Wastewater Capital
Improvements Plans (ClP) for the City of Fort Worth. The CIAC also considered
the inclusion of these CIP studies into our overall CIP study for the City of
North Richland Hills. This would be appropriate due to the need for the City
of Fort Worth to expand their facilities and increase service capacity as the
wholesale customers develop. Therefore, impact fees for the City of Fort
Worth water and wastewater system improvements to serve the customer growth
seem to be justified to be collected by us and passed onto Fort Worth.
The CIAC recommends the addition of the City of Fort Worth Water and
Wastewater Capital Improvements Plans to the NRH CIP and the increase of the
maximum impact fees that can be imposed to the levels shown on the attached
summary table. The maximum levels shown include the City of Fort Worth
maximum impact fee levels.
The actual assessment and collection of the Fort Worth impact.fees will only
be in the area of the City of North Richland Hills served by the City of Fort
Worth. For wastewater, the area will include all of the City except the
Little Bear Creek service area served by Trinity River Authority (TRA). For
water, the area will inlcude all of the low pressure plane, City of Watuaga,
and a portion of the high pressure plane.
(817) 281-0041
· 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
The Commission thanks the Council for the opportunity to serve. We stand
ready to answer any questions you may have and look forward to our continued
participation as the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee.
Respectfully submitted,
Z:~;¡7Á~:'/
/"
Ma Wood "
Chairman
cc : P J.ar,¡ning ê"nd Zoning
Mr. ~odger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. D?nnis Horvath, Deputy City Manager
Iv1r. Gregory DickE~ns, Director of Public Works/Utilities
lVlr Barry LeBarùn, Director of Community Development
Mr. Rich?rd Albin, P.E., Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I Meter Size
I 5/8" x 3/4" or 3/4"
1"
I 1-1/2"
I 2"
3"
Ie 4"
6"
I 8"
I 10"
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
SUMMARY TABLE
OF
PROPOSED MAXIMUM WATER & WASTEWATER
IMPACT FEES
December 18, 1990
Proposed M~imum Pr0posed Maximum
W3ter Impact Fee Wascewater Impact Fee
$ 1,5\)4.00 $ 1,509.00
$ 2,679.25 $ 2,622.75
$ :J, /70.00 $ 5,886.00
$ 9,737.00 $ 10,189.00
$ 20,674.00 $ 22,800.00
$ 35,578.00 $ 39,714.00
$ 77,860.00 $ 89,706.00
$127,400.00 $141,940.00
$147,504.00 $214,404.00
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1708
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCES NO. 1679 AND 1701 OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS ADOPTING ADDITIONS TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR
WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS; INCREASING THE WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT
FEE RATE SCHEDULES; AND ESTABLISHING IMPACT FEE COLLECTION FEE LEVELS IN THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS.
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of North Richland Hills, Texas, that:
SECTION 1
Section 2 of Ordinance No. 1679 shall hereinafter read ~s follows:
"Section 2. Capital Improvements Plan
The City Council hereby approves and adopts the WQLer and Wastewater
Impact Fee Study Capital Improvements Plans, copies of which are attached
hereto as Exhibit "B", Exhibit "C", and Exhibit "D". Exhibit "B" addresses
the portion of the overall North Richland Hills Capital Improvements Plan to
be accomplished within the Service Area shown in Exhibit "A". Exhibits "e"
and "D" are Capital Improvements Plans for Water and Wastewater Impact Fees
covering the City of Fort Worth's systems which include service to North
Richland Hills as a wholesale customer. A copy of the Water and Wastewater
Impact Fee Study Capital Improvements Plan which includes Exhibits "B", "C",
and "D" shall be maintained at all times in the City Hall."
Section 4 of Ordinance No. 1679 shall hereinafter read as follows:
"Section 4. Impact Fee Schedule
A fee shall be charged against each lot or tract of land and the owner
thereof whose water and/or wastewater line shall be connected with any water
line and/or wastewater line in the eity, and fees shall be charged at the
following rates based on the water meter size:
* North Richland Hills' System Impact Fees are shown on attached
Schedule "A".
* Fort Worth's System Impact Fees are shown on attached Schedule "B"."
Section 15 of Ordinance No. 1701 shall hereinafter read as follows:
"Section 15. Effective Date
This ordinance shall be effective immediately from the date of passage
and approval. Between June 19, 1990 and December 31, 1991, the City shall
impose and collect impact fees shown on Schedule "A" based upon 50% of each
item. From and after December 31, 1991, the full impact fees on Schedule "A"
shall be collected.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Impact fees shown on Schedule "B" shall be imposed and collected at the
levels shown on Schedules "c" and "D" during the time periods specified. All
impact fees collected based on Schedule "B" will be paid to the City of Fort
Worth on a quarterly basis."
SECTION 2
This amendment to Ordinances No. 1679 and 1701 shall be in full force
from alld after its date of passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLANl)
HILI.;S, TEXAS this 28trl day of January, 1991.
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City
I
I
Ie
I
I Meter Size
5/8 x 3/4 inch or
I 3/4 inch
1 inch
I 1-3/4 inch
1-1/2 inch
I 2 inch
I 3 inch
inch
4
Ie 6 inch
8 inch
I 10 inch
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
SCHEDULE ttA"
Water and Wastewater Impact Fees
(North Richland Hills Systems)
Equivalency ~~~to~ Water Wastewater Total
1.00 $ 725 $ 225 $ 949
1.67 1,21"~ 374 1,585
2.77 ¿,008 620 2,628
3.33 2,414 746 3,160
5.J3 3,864 1,194 5,058
10.00 7,250 2,240 9,490
16.67 12,086 3,734 15,820
33.33 24,164 7,466 31,630
60.00 43,500 13,440 56,940
96.67 70,086 21,654 91,740
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
SCHEDULE "B"
Water and Wastewater Impact Fees
(Fort Worth Systems)
Meter Size Equivalency Factor Water Wastewater
3/4" 1 $ 839.00 $ 1,22S.00
1" 1.75 1,468.25 2,248.75
1-1/2" 4 3.356.00 5,140.JO
" " 7 5/8.73.00 8,99:5.00
L..
3" 16 ~_3,424.ÛÙ 20,560.00
4" 28 2 3 , ..192 . 00 35,980.00
6" 64 53,696.00 82,240.00
8" 100 83,900.00 128,500.00
10" 150 125,850.00 192,750.00
."
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
SCHEDULE "C"
Water Impact Fee
Collection Schedules
(Fort Worth System)
Meter Size
FW Impact Fee sc~edule to be collected, effective January 1, 1991.
Equivalency Factor
3/411
111
1-1/2"
2"
3"
4"
6"
8"
10"
1
1.75
4
7
16
28
64
100
150
Water Impact Fee
$ 251.70
440.48
1,006.80
1,761.90
4,027.20
7,047.60
16,108.80
25,170.00
37,755.00
Meter Size
FW Impact Fees schedule to be collected, effective October 1, 1991.
Equivalency Factor
3/4"
1"
1-1/2"
2"
3"
4"
6"
8"
10"
1
1.75
4
7
16
28
64
100
150
Water Impact Fee
$ 293.65
513.89
1,174.60
2,055.55
4,698.40
8,222.20
18,793.60
29,365.00
44,047.50
Meter Size
FW Impact Fee schedule to be collected, effective October 1, 1992.
Equivalency Factor
3/4"
I"
1-1/2"
2"
3"
4"
6"
8"
10"
1
1.75
4
7
16
28
64
100
150
Water Impact Fee
$ 335.60
587.30
1,342.40
2,349.20
5,369.60
9,396.80
21,478.40
33,500.00
50,340.00
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
SCHEDULE "D"
Wastewater Impact Fee
Collection Schedules
(Fort Worth System)
FW Impact Fee schedule to b2 c~llecteG, effective the date of execution.
Meter Size
Equivalency Factor
3/4"
1"
1-1/211
2"
3"
4"
6"
8"
10"
1
1.75
4
I
16
28
64
100
150
Wastewater Impact Fee
$ 161.00
281.75
644.00
1,127.00
2,576.00
4,508.00
10,304.00
16,100.00
24,150.00
Meter Size
FW Impact Fees schedule to be collected, effective October 1, 1991.
Equivalency Factor
3/4"
1"
1-1/2"
2"
3"
4"
6"
8"
10"
1
1.75
4
7
16
28
64
100
150
Wastewater Impact Fee
$ 449.75
787.06
1,799.00
3,148.25
7,196.00
12,593.00
28,784.00
44,975.00
67,462.50
Meter Size
FW Impact Fee schedule to be collected, effective October 1, 1992.
Equivalency Factor
3/4"
1"
1-1/211
2"
311
4"
6"
8"
10"
1
1.75
4
7
16
28
64
100
150
Water Impact Fee
$ 514.00
899.50
2,056.00
3,598.00
8,224.00
14,392.00
32,896.00
51,400.00
77,100.00
I.
t_
I
I
lU= co
EXHIBIT "Cft
Part of . Ordinance No. 1708
,
For Water Impact Fees
February 1990
_
II
I
Full copy available in
City Secretary's office.
'.
_
Prepared by the Fort Worth Water Department
EXHIBIT "D"
Part of Ordinance No. 1708
CAPITAL
MPROVEMENT
... P l A N ~ '\
For Wastewater Impact Fees
February 1990
Full copy available in
City Secretary's office.
fa
Prepared by the Fort Worth Water Department
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~epartment: PUbl~C Works Council Meeting Date: 1/28/91
~ubject: Publ1c Hearing on Davis Boulevard (FM 1938) Assessments Agenda Number: GN 91:-11
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
"'. Operating Budget
I . Other
Public Hearing will be conducted on the improvements for Davis Boulevard from Emerald
Hills Way to starnesjRumfield Road. All notices to the owners of the 117 properties
adjacent to this 2.5 mile section of road have been mailed in accordance with the law.
Advertisement of the proposed assessment rates and public hedrir1g occurred in a local
newspaper on the 4th, 13th and 18th of this month.
staff recommends the public hearing be opened and t"h~ consultant. conducting the
Enhancement study be introduced. The audience should be ~.~formed that they will have an
opportunity to speak now prior to the hearing b~i~g recessed and later when the hearing
is reconvened on March 25, 1991. The results of the Enh;incement stuòÿ will be available
at the March 25th meeting.
Recommendation:
Open the public hearing and take testimony from the public.
until 7:30 p.m. on March 25, 1991.
Recess the public hearing
N/A
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/A
Sufficient Funds Available
-
~~
ent Head Signature ~ager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Pa e 1 of 1
I
I Department:
.Ubject:
I
I
Ii
II
II
I
I
1 .
~:
4 .
5 .
6 .
7 .
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Pr¡rkR r¡nn 'R~~r~r¡t: ; on nepartment Council Meeting Date: 1/28/91
Award of Bids on Watauga Road Median Irriga.tion
ann TIr¡nnR~r¡pi ng Agenda Number: PW 91-03
On August 17, 1990, the City Council rejected a bid of $72,703.25 for the
landscaping and irrigation of the Watauga Road Median from Rufe Snow Drive to
Davis Boulevard. This item was tabled pending review of the landscape plan by
the Beautification Commission. Council also recommended that the irrigation
a~rl landscaping be bid separately.
The landscape plan was redesigned by the North Richland Hills Beautification
COIIDuission with assistance from Granger Associatès, landscape Architects.
Staff from Knowlton, English, Flowers, Inc. worked wit~ both the Boautification
Co~~ission and Hank Granger to coordinatL the preparation of revised
c0nstruction plans, specifications, and bid docl·ment3 for this project.
Bids were received on January 17, 1991 for ~oth ìrrigaticn improvements and
landscape planting. Seven (7) contractors su:)mitted bids for the irrigation
work, and nine (9) contractors submitted bids for the landscape planting work.
The following is a summary of the bids for irrigation:
Contractor
Total Bid
Axon, Inc.
Wall's Green Enterprises
Landscape Design & Construction
Whitmore & Sons, Inc.
Phillips Lawn Sprinkler Co.
Randall & Blake, Inc.
General Industrial Contractors
$37,299.25
$39,871.69
$41,284.00
$48,013.39
$48,311.92
$49,588.26
$51,922.80
The following is a summary of the bids for landscape installation:
Contractor
Total Bid
1. General Industrial Contractors
2. Hadden Landscaping
3. Randall & Blake, Inc.
4. Whitmore & Sons, Inc.
5. Tumbleweed Garden Center, Inc.
6. Hawkins Nursery & Landscape Co.
7. Wall's Green Enterprises
8. Landscape Design & Construction
9. Phillips Lawn Sprinkler Co.
$31,404.75
$32,701.47
$32,728.53
$36,314.05
$37,565.99
$38,524.90
$46,389.62
$46,731.76
$47,364.25
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
A Operating Budget
_ Other
ë#4~ ti/Z~
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
~
, Finance Director
I
Page 1 of
I·
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
_
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
The low bid for the Irrigation contact is $37.299.25 bv Axon. Inc.,
1768 Empire Central, Dallas, Texas 75235. The low bid for the
Landscape contract is $31.404.75 bv General Industrial Contractors.
Inc., 3602 N. Sylvania, Fort Worth, Texas 76111. The Irrigation and
Landscape low bids total $68.704.00, which is under the budgeted
amount of $70,000.00 for this project. The landscape architect, Hank
Granger, is familiar with the work of both contractors and recommends
them highly.
FUNDING SOL~CE:~
Tht~ Council authc)rized a budget of $70, 000. 00 for the landscapi~'g of
Wat~uaa Road on November 14, 1988 (PW 88-41). Sufficient funds ~~~
avail~ble in the Watauga Road account (13-01-85-6000) to cover the
combined low bids of $68,704.00 and provide a $1,296.00 corìtingen~y
amouTlt.
REÇf)MMENDATION:
The Staff recommends the Council award the Irrigation contrõ,ct to +:11=
]o~ bidder, Axon, Inc., in the amount of $37,299.25 for a per~n~ of
60 calendar days. We would also recommend award of the Landscape
contract to General Industrial Contractors, Inc., in the amount of
$31,404.75 for a period of 60 calendar days, (to begin after
completion of the Irrigation contract) and approve funding as
described above.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page of
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSUL TING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
January 21, 1991
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: 3-336(LS), CITY OF ~~O_~TH RICdLAND HILLS
WATAUGA ROAD MEDIAN IRP,IGATION & LANDSCArING
---
BID TABULATIONS
Bids were received on January 17, 1991, for both IrrigatjvI1 ~mprovements
and Landscape Planting for the Watauga Road Median ~~vlfl Rufe Snow to Davis
Blvd. Seven (7) contractors submitted bids for the Irrigation work, and
nine (9) contractors submitted bids for the Landscape Planting work.
The landscape plan was designed by the North Richland Hills Beautification
Committee with assistance from Granger Associates, Landscape Architects.
Ye have worked with both the Beautification Committee and Hank Granger to
coordinate the preparation of construction plans, specifications, and bid
documents for this project.
The following is a summary of the Irrigation bids:
CONTRACTOR
1 .
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7 .
Axon, Inc.
Wall's Green Enterprises
Landscape Design & Construct.
Whitmore & Sons, Inc.
Phillips Lawn Sprinkler Co.
Randall & Blake, Inc.
General Industrial Contract.
TOTAL BID
$ 37,299.25
39,871.69
41,284.00
48,013.39
48,311.92
49,588.26
51,922.80
The following is a summary of the Landscape bids:
1 .
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
General Industrial Contract. $
Hadden Landscaping
Randall & Blake, Inc.
Whitmore & Sons, Inc.
Tumbleweed Garden Center, Inc.
Hawkins Nursery & Landsc. Co.
Wall's Green Enterprises
Landscape Design & Construct.
Phillips Lawn Sprinkler Co.
31,404.75
32,701.47
32,728.53
36,314.05
37,565.99
38,524.90
46,389.62
46,731.76
47,364.25
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
January 21, 1991
WATAUGA ROAD MEDIAN
Page
2
The low bid for the Irrigation contract is $37,299.25 by Axon, Inc., 1768
Empire Central, Dallas, Texas 75235. The low bid for the Landscape
contract is $31,404.75 by General Industrial Contractors, Inc., 3602
N. Sylvania, Fort Worth, Texas 76111. The Irrigation and Landscape low
bids total $68, 70!~._.00, which is under the budgeted amount of $70,000 for
this project.
Atta~hed are lists ()f projects recently completed by these contractors for
your il1fcrmation. üur landscape architect, Hank Granger, is familiar with
the work of both contractors and recommends them highly.
Based on th~ hids received, we would recommend contract award of the
Irrigation contract to the low bidder, Axon, Inc., in the amount of
$37,299.25 for a period of 60 calendar days. Ye would also recommend
award of the Landscape contract to General Industrial Contractors, Inc.,
in the amount of $31,404.75 for a period of 60 calendar days, (to begin
after completion of the Irrigation contract).
We will be present at the January 28, 1991, Council meeting to answer any
questions you may have concerning this project.
~w,~
RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manager
Mr. Jim Browne, Director of Parks and Recreation
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Mr. Hank Granger, Granger Associates
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Public Works/utilities
Approve Budget for Valley Park Estates
Subject: Sewer Extensions
Council Meeting Date: 1/28/91
Agenda Number: PW 91-04
On August 16, 1990, the ClP Committee authorized the Public Works Department to proceed
with the design of sewer facilities to serve Valley Park Estates. Construction plans for
those lines are now complete and reflect the pipe layout as shown on the attached map.
The estimated cost for design and construction is $126,400. Based on the proposed
assessment policy, the anticipated asseSb~C'l1t will be approximately $28.44 per front foot.
A survey of the property owners in the subject addìtion is attached. It shows that 11 of
the 27 property owners whicì ~~cou~t for 21 (If the 40 lots or tracts do not want public
sewer lines extended if they ha~~ -:0 pay for the majority of the cost. The 11 property
owners account for 51.4% of thE~ total property frontage involved in the survey.
The City will need to jI!st.all sewer 15 TIéì::) in this addition at some point in the future if
not now. Due to hou~es already exis·cing on 21 of the 40 lots, staff feels the subject
improvements should b~ accomplished ~rior to any more houses being constructed in this
area.
Funding Source:
Sufficient funds are available from utility Retained Earnings and may be appropriated as
indicated below:
From: 02-00-00-0599
Operating Budget Retained Earnings
$127,000
To: 02-08-01-6000
Valley Park Estates Sewer Extensions
(Engineering $19,000; Construction $108,000)
$127,000
Recommendation:
The staff recommends the City Council approve the subject budget and the transfer of funds
from our utility Operating fund to the utility Construction fund as indicated above.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Oth
---X-
Acct. Number Spp Ahnvp
Sufficient Funds Available
~
f
. Finance Director
Page 1 of 1
.f'
I
.z
u
anc
a:Ln
~ .
"
u:
(T:
~
I
C
cr:
c
C'_
P'tu'·
UC
('I')
-CIJ
ct·
t-'fI:t
\t')
u
('f1
a:
t-
..u
uc
C'1
·CD
a:.
t-~
u
U<
('t')
o ...
I ~:
.......
~
CT1
.c
o
VJ
'cÜ
a: <:.
CD
r~
r·/~··;
::.:23
f ,
-~~
,-...
(T)
~
U')~
... . £
::1:.
to
...
æ 0
~-; ~
co (\J 0
U-J
tD
,T)
l!1
("f1
-
-J
C"1
(T)
"
CD
\t)
~ N I
~ ....
eo¡
~ J J.. I
4. ~ ~
>~ i ~Æ,:
M'~ d)
.t
:~
~
V'
J
-.;)
'N
J
..t.
~u
~c
a:..
t-\t)
....u
c(c(
CD
0(D
a:~
.....
f""
r-
~
~~
~
o
3
u
me(
t'
-"
a:~
t- -
N
-.
("1
c(u N
Cl)C ~u
a:CI1 CI)~
to- a:C\I ::J:u U
t- ~~ U
,..... ~
~~ a: ...
...
...u
:I:C
"
om
a:.
t-N
Cu
r--:c
~...
o I m I
~~.;;;¡¡¡,;:;-.......,--~_._--~~
I
KNOTVLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
I
O~: CITY OF NORTH RICHlANO HIllS JOB NO.: 3-428 DATE:
IROJECT DESCRIPTION: VAllEY PARK ESTATES SANITARY SEWE8 IMPROVEMENTS
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
OCTOBER 22. 1990
I DESCRIPTION OF ITEM ITEM TOTAL UNIT
NO. UNIT QUANTITY PRICE COST
_II Oia. (OR-35) PVC Sewer Pipe 1 . L. F ~ 2,072 10.00 $ 20,720.00
.. Dia. (DR-35) PVC Sewer Pipe 2. L.F. 1)120 5.00 5,600.00
rench Excavation, Embedment & Backfill (5'-7') 3. L.F. 200 12.00 2,400.00
Itrench Excavation, Embedment & Backfill (7'-9') 4. L.F. 1,022 15.00 15,330.00
rench Excavation, Embedment & Backfill (9'-11') 5. L.F. 440 15.00 6,600.00
rench Excavation, Embedment & Backfill (11'-J:') 6. L.F. 410 17.00 6,970.00
Standard Sewer Service Connection 7. EACH 19 200.00 3,800.00
!Jeep-cut Service Connection H. EACH 22 300.00 6,600.00
ype "A" Manhole 9. EACH 8 1200.00 9,600.00
Extra Depth for Manhole 10. VLF 37 100.00 3,700.00
.aw Cuts 11 . L.F. 530 4.00 2,120.00
sphalt Pavement Replacement for Martin Drive 1':' S.F. 500 2.00 1,000.00
~....
sphalt Pvrnt Replrnt for Crane Road (Incl. Overlay) 13. L.F. 460 20.00 9,200.00
Asphalt Pvrnt Replrnt for Services in Valley Park 14. L.F. 200 5.00 1,000.00
Iype 11011 Misc. HMAC (Comp. 211 Thick) 15. TON 37 50.00 1,850.00
oncrete Drive and Sidewalk Replacement 16. L.F. 83 8.00 664.00
Gravel Drive Replacement 17. L.F. 63 6.00 378.00
__ Repair 18.. L.F. 70 7.50 525.00
erve or Replace Water Services 19. EACH 23 150.00 3,450.00
nch Excavation Safety Protection 20. L.F. 3,.007 2.00 6,014.00
LTERNATE:
ore & Pressure Grout Sewer Main at Driveway X-ing 16A. L.F. 75
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUB-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: -------------
PLUS: ENGIN.. LAYOUT. INSPECT., TESTING
AND CONTINGENCIES
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ------------------
$107,521.00
18,879.00
$126,400.00
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
OWNER ADDRESS SURVEY/ADDITION YES NO UNDECIDED
Foster, Doris 6500 Crane Rd. Block 1, Lot 1 - V.P. X
Est.
-
Federal Home Loan Vacant Block 1, Lot 2 - V.P.
Mortgage Cor:p. Est.
_.-
I :rackson, Willis 6512 Crane Rd. Block 1, Lot 3R - V.P. ., ..
I ~\.
Est.
Matthew[", Mabel Block 1, Lot 5 - V.P. l
Est.
Hunt, Marvin 6520 Crane Rd. Block 1, Lot 6 - V.P. X
Est.
_.
Weigel, Frank 6521 Parkway Block 1, Lot 7 - V.P. X
Est.
Bayuk, James 6517 Parkway Block 1, Lot 8 - V.P.
Est.
e Bayuk, Steven 6513 Parkway Block 1, Lot 9 - V.P. X
Est.
Pempsell, Austin 6509 Parkway Block 1, Lot 10 - V.P. X
Est.
Lockwood, Richard 6505 Parkway Block 1, Lot 11 - V.P. X
Est.
Chow, Siefu Block 1, Lot 12 - V.P.
Est.
Hlinko, R. Block 2, Lots X
1,2,3,10,11, 12 - V.P.
Est.
Thompson, Claudia 6512 Parkway Block 2, Lot 4 - V.P.
Est.
Cook, Paul 6516 Parkway Block 2, Lot 5 - V.P.
Est.
Watson, Gary 6520 Parkway Block 2, Lots 6 & 7 - X
V.P. Est.
Curry, Robert Block 2, Lots 8 & 9 -
V.P. Est.
Freeby, Clark 6600 Crane Rd. Blk. 3, Lots 1 & 2 - V.P. X
Est.
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
VALLEY PARK ESTATES SEWER EXTENSION
Results of Survey
1/21/91
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Smith, John 9017 Valleyview Block 3, Lot 3 - V.P. X
Est.
Patterson, Carol 9021 Valleyview Block 3, Lot 4 - V.P. X
Est.
Holmes, J.R. Block 3, Lots 5,6,7 - X
V.P. Est.
I --
Nielson, Henry _19037 Valleyvit:.'w Block 3, Lots 8R & 11 - X
V.P. Est.
Cartwright, Richard ~ 6516 ValleyviE.w Blk. 3, Lt. 12 - V.P.
Est.
Franks, Bob 6512 Valle~~iew Block 3, Lot 13 - V.P.
-~alleYView Est.
Hinkley, Gardner Block 3, Lots 14, 15, & X
16 - V.P. Est.
Sexton, James 8913 Martin Dr. Lot 1 - Sexton Addn.
Parker, Lloyd Lot 3 - Sexton Addn. X
Ward, J.W. 6525 Crane Rd. T.K. Martin Survey - Tr. X
7B
SUMMARY TABLE
Response Property Owners Lots or Tracts Frontage
For 3 (11.1%) 5 (12.5%) 614.78' (15.3%)
Against 11 (40.7%) 21 (52.5%) 2,070.50' (51.4%)
No Response 10 (37.1%) 11 (27.5%) 907.30' (22.5%)
Undecided 3 (11.1%) 3 ( 7.5%) 435.58' (10.8%)
TOTALS 27 (100%) 40 (100%) 4,028.08' (100%)
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
December 17, 1990
1-
2-
3-
RE: VALLEY PARK ESTATES SANITAR.Y SEWE~~ SERVICE;
4-
5-
On August 3, 1990, a letter was S€i!C to you and other affected owners by Mr.
Kevin Miller, the City's Assistant Director of utilities, regarding the above
referenced project. Included with the letter was a map showing the area to be
served, a predesign construction cost estimate, approximate cost to be
assessed each lot owner, and the average connection fee (additional to
assessment) for each lot.
A meeting of the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Committee was held
November 20, 1990 to discuss another project similar to this one. These
projects may be considered depending on the need and on a percentage of the
property owners agreeing to being assessed their portion of the construction
cost.
Please indicate your choice in the matter by initialling one of the following
and returning this letter to me in the enclosed envelope.
I am in favor of the City of North Richland Hills constructing the
necessary sanitary sewer mains in Valley Park Estates in order to
provide all the subdivision with sewer service and I hereby agree being
assessed my portion of the construction cost based on my street
frontage.
I am not in favor of the project described above.
Please contact me by phone and indicate your choice if you cannot return the
letter by January 1, 1991.
If you have any questions, please call either myself, Mr. Kevin Miller, or Mr.
Greg Dickens at 281-0041.
Sincerely,
Mark D. Bradley
Right-of-Way Agent
I
I Department:
I_Ubject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Public Works/Utilities
Approve Budget for Crane Road Sewer
Extensions
1/28/91
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: PW 91-05
In response to a petition for sewer service from some of the Crane Road residents, we
worked up a preliminary layout and estimate. The estimated cost for design and
construction is $84,200. Based on the proposed assessment policy, the anticipated
assessment will be approximately $24.76 per front foot.
As instructed by the CIP CLùlrnittee at their meeting on November 20, 1990, a survey of the
property owners in the subject area was conducted and is attached. It shows that 11 of
the 21 property owners whicr :\("~O~ln~~ for 12 of the 29 lots or tracts do want public sewer
lines extended and are willip~ to be assessed for their portion of the cost. The 11
property owners account for 4.J .5% e,f the total property frontage involved in the survey.
The City will need to install S~Wèr lines in this addition at some point in the future if
not now. Due to houses already existing on 18 of the 21 lots, staff feels the subject
improvements should be accomplished prior to any more houses being constructed in this
area.
Funding Source:
Sufficient funds are available from utility Retained Earnings and may be appropriated as
indicated below:
From: 02-00-00-0599 $85,000
Operating Budget Retain Earnings
To: 02-08-02-6000 $85,000
Crane Road Sewer Extensions
(Engineering $14,000; Construction $71,000)
Recommendation:
The staff recommends the City Council approve the subject budget and the transfer of funds
from our utility Operating fund to the utility Construction fund as indicated above.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
-
Acct. Number See Above
Sufficient ~n~lable 2. /
kq~ - · Finance Director
City anager
x
.~
Ignature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
1
I
-----
, \~\7 '~. '~. ~~. ~ · J at . I II
".-' ,. ~-' ) !:.-r-
". ~.~..~» ,.~*' ~o ¡ ) ~ ¡ J 2 at
\&~. ~~ I ~ , \. , II 0 7ï I' i ' i 10
~ =.....ìa. - ~ · f
' , , : ....-,a! · I I' I I' I ,.
- - - -~ ~it».- -I::-- - - - - - - - - -
,,",.,.j~ ".:-- r ,~, I I~ T ¡ I
I .. r .,... .. I ,,".10. "",10
fa ~ ~ . AC I . M
I~~~ ~ : = - '~i: ,,",. '..~;. J~~ µJ-~ !
'~J ¡:~~; . ~ ;- ,~, It 1.6.... I
TII II \£?" ~. D - ,~... I~ ~ ,~,..
I .. «~ t~~\\ '10.': ~ ~ I - : ~;; ." 4t ~~ I,ll OC I 'u.
",,,¡s ~~\ '0 ~I '~~.I · - ~'.1:1 ,Ii. 1 , J.I M
I \. '\> ' ~. AC lilt ¡ ~
:\ .....' -
WAL. T'[P. ~
T!·A~C 1A n A~ ".-. Ta. utA ,fA.'" j ~
- . _ 1 "'-....c ç' ~1 "'1 ~
I ~ .L 1:'\ MOl HIJ.Ja. CA"
TII TIle.. /10 :J" J .....
'" IN. \ \...1" þ.\'I5 \'\ '~ :' \ _I TII.... ~..... JDI r" D .¡-;- II I' 7~~ 17
ioU " 'A IN 5\JL.~ 1 ,.. ,"I \ ~ · M 'A rJ- 1 _ ~ n ~.".~
S.UAl ~ lAC , _... '.IIAC
~ '4 :.-- J · fo~'- L. ~ ~ I' -: ,.', \ 7; so I IS
~': \ ~'IO I," . Q,O''{ .,_ ~~i : ~I~~ - "~:I.:" j '--;. ~ ......t..~ . ., ~ '''_
8 10 '0... - 4- - j J ., ". " , 1 sqq . HOe HILL CIA
· I ,\ TO ., \,.) 0 ,¡(¡. .IS .. ~ l H- II 10 II '. I I 4
~YOH AO \ I AC ., 0.:1" .c.gt; COUL., --:.,.... 1 ( "207S) l....IIII ~ II ..1. "I a. I u 1...
18 / \ .. \ ,~E>Q, .~ T:.J.........-.:e ~ I - ...IIIIIIE-. ~ f
):~:~~I~F~\I" 1110 \ ~s)., \s~ j: ,~~ ~t.l ~~.i_l~)! I:' /~/"/H,','íl:i~,D:. ¡at
I lA0f 6ATE AD ~ ~JJ. I _~_ . IIII""IJ 2 I I ~!" ~
, I I , ., a: 0, I·' \ 2 I I" 4 ~ ) I. ~ ¡ U
· I' · ,I.~ .0 U, ,. eel I i 10 I" II ~ TA..'
" · I . ~ A' S O~ rN Co t t S rot. - ... AC
I' I, ¡. . ~O \ I) /~. ~ ~ u \ I) ,f 1:1'1 ""'\ ~ / . I -
I I " I" . JI' '.. 10 ...;---./ ~2 ~ I 1 I ) f ' · ! ,. --
~£ AO, AD . I '1 " ¡-;-! ~ ~-;- ~~~. I. I ',2 ". ¡ I I . " , II \ ..
" II . I - It I )I ...! . I 10 ~ ,. r- , , ~ 4 .~å~c
~tJ.. n ----' .J __~ C ~ .t VAH ~SS ~
IG~IO \ø?ÞO It ...~"7g~~!I.. I~ '. 11.\11 \1' ~ It la. I" ~.\.~. n ..
~ . .. u" r;;- . . ~t4 ~ \" \ \J ----i I~, ~ \ " 6)
Jz-:- " .. ~ -;¡ u - -VV . 10 II . ~ -":"'1 10" tC:" ., 6
~ 17.J , · I 10 ,. ~ 2...
1.- II I' 0 10 ~ \ TO .., - ----1:10 _
} ) A' .::'::
.. I tI
I
fA. .
S., ~
r
~
,u I T~,¥ ~
--L_--~
T..c L./
I.
..
~~
! 1)
!~
o ,
~~
~ I
-----
.
1-.: - - - - -
T. .
.." A.c
.,-
I
,,,. "u
, A
/
1 T. . IN i ,., III
. " AC I · AC
I'
I
fA 2l
I ... At
,..."
lAC
I
I
'"'. ,
I." AC
Lox
I '.C
I~
I~
!
i :~iXJ [
'A. X!a
r'
'"' ," I
I .. -'c
, ~~; 'lc
",.XI
... ~
I
~
I
,...W
lAC
II'
~
II
II
'R. ,
.,.~ Ae
I
,.. ,..
I
C:l.1:y ~f No~th. R:l.ch1l:ar1d. H:Uls. Te~&
uti 1 i t Y D e par t men t
CRANE RD. SEWER EXTENSION
\
\
."- J~I' j~l
I ...:.. ~-~-.: ........; - ~ ':._\ -- c.s~ ~ ¡ '"' ~ ~ /" / ~ ~-1--'-' ,f j..~.....
- --)( - J x· I 1 ¡ I
1-0- 641.6 ... I 6A- ~:: -ç~ TR·.~~ý ~ ,/ /?
Ox - , ~ I
- A rI ~ 668.2x I
1_ ~~ ~~.n~
J\ ~ OX?,~ c::I ....' _ ~ -
,..... ...:...---u Ii TR. 3K A 0 ABSTRACT
I - D " ,,~ /6 )(j,055
~ A C ~ - - r-- T. K. MArRTI VEY
1- ~~ ~~(~- ~ ,.. ---:------ ~ r----/
~ Ii -n ~\; -\~ 3~.M.:J o,.~ // /x
I), ~'VI ~ _ ~~_ -¡.::""" ~lfT -- .--:þ:l (~\( ~ \~/~ V \ 0
~ ~ )( ~ G - _ I( ~ V / /'. \ x / r
I~:~~"-'-q _ -:=\~~j\_ll~\V\/" /~/~
I ~ ~ \~~~~~" \~(.J ~o ~
~~~ ~f\I~!~ ,} l.-l //
. ~ ~ ~ ~ - - -.......; - ~ ------ I ..tC.V ~o
/ -- (-¡ r-4oI-I'\ "". r u ~
I I }(2~ -- ~~~ "'. ,',,- J-7 I
----... ~ £--.. -;: \.. ~ \ ~ of. / /
. ) ( - r-h.t .A.;::-""'Io... Å - ~ .""\. """"- ~ \ /
ì r ..... ~ ~- ~ __' ;
I ::J:-~ ~ ~ ~ '""~~ - ¡
-~....-- ~', I
V - ~'" · \ ".
r -- N A, \~ -- \ I "" I J !
, ~~~ ~~1J~ > Þ II .~ (' V~· 'L', ~
~ ~~ ~~-:..~~~~~~ ~ ~/¡ r~~ ~~ ~/' ~
I~QL~ ~~~:tJrV?~~~ {~~~~-\/~'k~~ 'Y~~
~~ ,,. H~ "'''~// // L ~ t/ Ff ~t1,' I ~~ I ~~ ~
I ~~~~=~~) / ~~ I~~
~~-- ~¿~ = ~ /" ) j / ~ - - L
I TR.al;?~:~~~/p-~ J-:~- I ~
I _ß -----r ~r=Jir-? ~I' ~.;~-.! Y-:: I , I
C:l.ty e>f North R:l.chls,r1d. Hills, Te~s
I utility Department
CRANE RD. SEWER EXTENSION
,.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
NC>r'th Richla.~d Hi11s
Utility Construction Cost Estimate
T.K. Martin Survey
CRANE RD. SEWER EXTENSION
! Item I Qty. I Unit I Price I Extension I
6" PVC Sanitary Sewer 1,510 LF $ 15.00 $ 22,650.00
Cast in Place Manholes 5 EA 1,nOO~Oo 5,000.00
I~" PVC Sewer Services 30 EA 500 . o~ 15,000.00
~emove & Replace Pavement 400 Sy 5.00 2,000.00
2" HMAC Overlay 4500 Sy 5.00 22,500.00
I Trench Safety 1,500 LF 2.8a 3,000.00
Subtotal $ 70,150.00
Contingencies 14,030.00
GRAND TOTAL $ 84,180.00 I
Estimated Cost per Linear Front Foot --------------------------»»
$24.76
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
----
- ...
~
..
\ c
--T~
\ ~
-
\
-.- .. ..
--
6A
A
I
- ---¡
B
,
'D ..
I: c _
.~' I
. ---,
I 5
~ ~
t G
I
.4
A
D 3
D
2
1
TR. 8J
2
...-
TR. 8D
-
1R
eCl
,
TR. 8 ~ ~
r---~
I 1-..._
TR. 3
TR. 3Z
TR. 3M
TR. 38
TR. 3Ql
-
I A
D D
1
L__
1
-:-
-- -
THREE E RANCH
1
L._
--
ABSTRACT
1055
T. K. MARTIN SURVEY
..
City of North R:l.chla.Z1d. Hills. Te:x:SLs
uti 1 i t Y D e p 8 r t men t
CRANE RD. SEWER EXTENSION
I w n _
I E
L
2
-
TR. 3DI
L_
NELM'S
ADD
TR. 3BlA
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CRANE ROAD SEWER EXTENSION
Results of Survey
1/21/91
OWNER ADDRESS SURVEY/ADDITION YES NO
Langley, Mark Vacant Lot 6A - Dawn King Add. X
Darrough, Hillard 6929 Crane Rd. Lot A - Dawn King Add.
Duty, Bobby 6925 Crane Rd - .2LOt B - Dawn King Add.
Crites, Joseph 6921 Crane Rd . . Lot C - Dawn King Add. X
Childers, Gary 6917 Crane Rd. t T ,ot. D - Dawn King Add. X
)---
Rushing, Ronald 6913 Crane Rd. , Lot 5 - Dawn King Add. X
,
Cox, Christie 6905 Crane Rd. Lot 3 & 4 - Dawn King X
Add.
Wooley, George 6901 Crane Rd. Lot 2 - Dawn King Add. X
Hobbs, Franklin 6829 Crane Rd. Lot 1 - Dawn King Add. X
Saurerwein, David 6821 Crane Rd. Lot 2 - Coulson Add.
Tr. 8J - T.K. Martin Sur.
Russell, Daniel 6809 Crane Rd. Tr. 8D - T.K. Martin Sur.
Coulson, Joe 6805 Crane Rd. Lot 1R - Coulson Add. X
Woolsey, Rogers 6725 Crane Rd. Tr. 8 and Tr. 8C1 - X
T.K. Martin Sur.
Realty Alliance Vacant Tr. 3Z, 3M, 3, 3H, 3Q1,
3K, - T.K. Martin Sur.
Hefley, Peter 6908 Crane Rd. Lot 1 - Tidwell Add. X
Smith, Edward 6904 Crane Rd. Lot 2 - Tidwell Add. X
Anderson, Keith Vacant Tr. 3Y2 - T.K. Martin S. X
Tatervich, Stanley 6820 Crane Rd. Tr. 3D - T.K. Martin Sur. X
Nelms, Bill 6818 Crane Rd. Lot 1 - Nelms Add. X
Edwards, Roy 6816 Crane Rd. Tr. 3B1A - T.K. Martin X
Sur.
Evans, Ester 6800 Crane Rd. Lot 1 - Three E Ranch X
SUMMARY TABLE
Response Property Owners Lots or Tracts Frontage
For 11 (52.4%) 12 (41.4%) 1,435' (41.5%)
Against 5 (23.8%) 6 (20.7%) 615' (17.8%)
No Response 5 (23.8%) 11 (37.9%) 1,410' (40.7%)
TOTALS 21 (100%) 29% (100%) 3,460' (100%)
I-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
December 6, 1990
1-
2 ,"
3-
RE: CRANE ROAD SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
4-
On October 26, 1990, a letter was sent to you and other affected owners by Mr.
Kevin Miller, the City's Assistant Director of utilities, regarding the above
referenced project. Included with the letter was a map showing the area to be
served, a predesign construction cost estimate, approximate cost to be
assessed each lot owner, and the average connection fee (additional to
assessment) for each lot.
A meeting of the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Committee was held
November 20, 1990 to discuss this project. The project may be considered
depending on the need and on a percentage of the property owners agreeing to
being assessed their portion of the construction cost.
Please indicate your choice in the matter by initialling one of the following
and returning this letter to me in the enclosed envelope.
I am in favor of the City of North Richland Hills constructing a
sanitary sewer main along Crane Road between South Crest Dr. and
Amundson Rd. and I hereby agree being assessed my portion of the
construction cost based on my frontage along Crane Road.
I am not in favor of the project described above.
Please contact me by phone and indicate your choice if you cannot return the
letter by December 17th.
If you have any questions, please call either myself, Mr. Kevin Miller, or Mr.
Greg Dickens at 281-0041.
Sincerely,
Mark D. Bradley
Right-of-Way Agent
I
I Department: Public Works/utilities
~ Approve Budget for Mlscellaneous Water and
I-Subject: Sanitary Sewer Main Replacements for 1991 Agenda Number: PW 91-06
Several water mains in the City's water system have to be repaired more than once a
year. A few of these mains require regular repair of leaks. This consistent
maintenance on a few mains takes a large percentage of our manhours and equipment time.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Council Meeting Date: 1/28/91
Due to the repetitive leaks on (1) Nor'east Drive, (2) Corona Drive, and (3) Topper
Court, the staff is recommenning ä PLCjoct be authorized to allow new PVC water mains
to be installed on all of these streets. ~he approximate length, size of main, and
street sections affected are listed below.
Nor'east Drive -
Corona Drive
Topper Court
2,400 feet of 6" cast ir')n from Scott Drive to Davis Blvd.
1.850 feet of 8" cast i'_"on from Rufe Snow Drive to Vance Road.
4c,O:eet ()f 6" cast ir'.)n from Nor' east Drive to the end.
Two other utility :_ìnes';"n the Cit~{ are causing the staff concern due to their age and
precarious locatio~'_<; ~~he first is a 2" water line located along the back property
lines in a commercial area bel"Cered by Rufe Snow Drive on the west, Flory Street on the
east, Glenview Drive on ~~!e north, and Grapevine Highway on the south. This water line
is beginning to leak. Any leak on this line is very hard to get to and causes several
businesses to be out of water for a lengthy period of time. The second is a 6" sewer
line located under Bedford-Euless Road from Airport Freeway east to Wedgeview Drive.
This line is beginning to come apart. High pressure cleaning to clear stoppages is
dislodging chunks of the wall of the pipe.
Rufe Snow Drive - 3,100 feet of 2" galvanized water pipe from Grapevine Highway
north to Glenview Drive.
Bedford-Kuless Road - 1,200 feet of 6" vitrified clay sewer from Airport Freeway east
to Wedgeview Drive.
The estimated cost for the 7,830 feet of water line replacement and 1,200 feet of sewer
line replacement is $350,000.
Funding Source:
From: 02-00-00-0599 $350,000
Operating Budget Retained Earnings
To: 02-08-03-6000 $350,000
Misc. 1991 Water and Sanitary Sewer Main Replacements
(Engineering $34,000, Construction $316,000)
Recommendation:
The staff and CIP Committee recommend the City Council approve the subject budget and
authorize the transfer of funds as detailed above.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number ~ee Ahove
SUffl~lentu.Available
~~<~~
llAð t:-6 ~
ignature - d ty Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
t Finance Director
-
---X-
Pa e 1 of 1
I. ~ ~A~~:ctJ~.! ',-: \!
, ~". ' · ; I : , I r·.: r. --. .. r-". \
h~_._..:.=::J t= \
I ,~)~~,~~ ' J
~"lt -:1".J.~ {~~~ \ ~"; -
. . ~ 1~·· \ -. I I ·
I, ¡:.:t~, '. - ; ¡
-_1(:'-" - '"
)~~
,/
!
"ií
Ii
.~ z
I~j. ,j_. .,; ,
. ..'.. . ..... ;1
1::-: ¡ r , ¡
j L . .-. - .¡
l, ....' ~ -
I : · --'
Ij
I,JÎ
;"
I J---'
\~.- ,. i
1 : · :.. ~.J-t~']:::::;: ~-"1 ~.¡ ~._.
, ::.;¡;,.. ;,¡..~,' I I " ' I -----'1 h,
(' :' " ii' \ ~ 'I .'. I - ¡ ~ -1 ~ t , I
"'-,..._ . _ __. , .-l.L ~ ~ ~ ... r " ...J L_.L..-rLL.L
'---- ~ r."T;'n1~· .---, !. I I ...L' --
I ~;.-.,.-..--' l'I_,~~~j~ï ~~ -
LL.. . . .L...¿ ~ ...J~~. ,..~.. : y.'À { j
C':' ~'I ~~I I I L.L r f - =
~ r--~' ..~ 1~ 1,~.~'~..,1" f., I' ,I, - ~; ;
I :::-:::---i~=----;---- -r~ ~~.: ,-.-~r ;~·C'ê;::T
., ...-..-~ ~- . . , , · .. ... . : 'X' ,i~l i 1-r-:-:ffi: ·_j~t It
~~ ~ I .............-..~ --,- ...
-=--==r":r---~I . I ' U:-. ".
, L.l.-J-J--tjj' ,~. . ,
.J.- L __..-. ~_. ~.. - I
Z J-'
~ -rl .
I ~ :] r::Ll-,l_L_L,
I g
I~~
o
I Z
~~
~~
tn
1-3
en
n
:Þ'
t-t
t2:j _.
t-'
=
II
J-eoA
--
0
0
0
M
~
;,
t
~ T r 1 I I I r 1 \ 1.1 I I - ~ · . ~'-:_--'~~\
~.~~~Im~~m~~-~~ ,~4,J\
rv ìi1 7 ..,,!'f'f'iL -=-_ ~ '('
I ~ rfj II j ~ 5---- - TInT ~>
" r I I Ii ~ I (..L L-l T"- ~ CJ::: \
r II I I :::~ OJ ill \j J J I ~PI~ y 0,
~ r I \~---~ ;~ \y~,
S__O. I \ "- ~ h 1 I ~
"f'GÞOI'S rr ~~ :-_ =:
..oah "CM" uo [L(M 1 lë I í:-I-- ~ I ¡ I
JY"'O. ..·G.. 'CMOI,)\. I ~ I J~__ ~ffi;:: ~ I 1
rll"ITIU ~ r II t--¡TJIII Ilf I
,I Tlrl I I I III I tIITIJJJ T "V" I I ~ { T ¡.u II
~ H r I I 1-1 =Ir. ."JTl 1 ~ LL t I ~ I 1ti nfTTl
:3RTT I r =:::::" J cr:J'1 r ~ ~ -~,
f 11 ~ .....J=-= ~. ~ti= \rnç:~;·
1" II 1- ::::::: =E3~, y r3
ì f ~ r ~ ~~ ?Uní 1 J
II I~ ~ ~ I II
~~W~~'Em~ I ,1 JDJW,Ji... ib
---
RUFE SNOW DRIVE
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'
LOCATION
lVIA.P
liifi . ~ '_.J1J!'.. .
~ ' , T..... ..... ¡:; i / .. "~
"t-~ ."
I§' ~ \ / I ~+~.~ i
,..., +'
I~ j \ '
I~m~ 1 ~l' I ~
H ~~~~ ((i ~
il;¡¡·- I ~I
I fm~=.\=1 II ~ ,
tt1I tIIJ.:1 L::LJ" -
~~- r ~~I~\ -- ~
l~gf3 .~~/
I~A I~ ',l4, = ___~~1 ~ rri
'I I ~U !_~L--
1<:1~=~====_ I II '.\ -,- '-=-----ll
I~ ~,
~ ê~ ~= =:= ::= _L - ~ -~:: ¡
"¡. --< __ - i-- / '
I ~?~ - =.: ß¡- ~ - : ~ /1~f---~~--- 'ii'
-.t=j . --i!~- -< h II ~ "7 /1-" - - ---~ I
~LJ=k:C]L.J-1 =-.1 ~ 0 C _ _..~ ~ t=- - --=:"--- - I
I I I 'ill \ 'J I1rí"'~" ,...-! - R - _~~ I
_1_ I ,. I~ L - ~ ~ '
---,' .
I ~~~ ~ &- ~~
I>
~
l(j
\
~
II
~ \ ~
I ~ I;
- ~
I ~ ~ I :
~ r~~ ""
1 .
-
1--
I
-
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'
LOCA TION
MAP
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
REPAIR RECORD
NOR'EAST DRIVE
DATE ADDRESS ACTION TAKEN
02/21/90 7521 Nor I east Dr. Repaired 6" water main.
11/03/89 7601 N{J~'~ast Dr. Repaired 6" water main.
10/19/89 ==1:513 Nor'east Dr. Repaired 6" water main.
07/13/89 Nor I east Dr. Repaired 6" water main.
L 7609
07/11/8S 7609 Nor'east Dr. Repaired 6" water main.
06/14/89 7605 Nor'east Dr. Repaired 6" water main.
w =1
02/1f:,/89 7605 Nor'east Dr. Repaired 6" water main.
01/11/89 7101 Nor'east Dr. Repaired 6" water main.
-
09/19/88 7505 Nor I east Dr. Repaired 6" water main.
06/06/88 7517 Nor'east Dr. Repaired 2 - 6" water mains.
06/02/88 7521 Nor I east Dr. Repaired 6" water main.
CORONA DRIVE
DATE ADDRESS ACTION TAKEN
07/02/90 6732 Corona Drive Repaired 8" gate valve.
06/03/90 7100 Corona Drive Repaired 6" water main.
10/17/89 6825 Corona Drive Repaired 8" water main.
10/06/89 6800 Corona Drive Repaired 8" water main.
10/04/89 6800 Corona Drive Repaired 8" water main.
07/28/89 6800 Corona Drive Repaired 8" water main.
07/21/89 6900 Corona Drive Repaired 8" water main.
06/09/89 6732 Corona Drive Repaired 8" water main.
01/10/89 6900 Corona Drive Repaired 8" water main.
01/10/89 6900 Corona Drive Repaired 8" water main.
01/29/88 6808 Corona Drive Repaired 8" water main.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
REPAIR RECORD
TOPPER COURT
DATE
09/14/89
04/03/89
04/01/89
11/18/87
11/19/87
01/27/87
ADDRESS
5508 Topper Court
5520 Topper Court
5520 Topper Court
Topper & Nor'east
.... ~. -- .-.
Topper & Nor'e~st
ACTION TAKEN
Repaired 4" water main.
Repaired 4" water main.
Repaired 4" water main.
Repaire(~ 6" water main.
RepaireJ 6" water main.
RepaiJ'. ed 4" water main.
5500 Topper Cour<:
-.-
RUFE SNOW DRIVE
- .'-'
DATE ADDRESS
01/01/90 3732 Rufe Snow
02/19/90 3900 Rufe Snow
07/18/90 3700 Rufe Snow
12/28/90 3700 Rufe Snow
BEDFORD- EULESS ROAD
ACTION TAKEN
Repaired 2" water main (dug by hand.)
Repaired 2" water main.
Repaired 2" water main.
Rerouted 2" water main (break under
building) .
DATE ADDRESS ACTION TAKEN
10/27/89 8601 Bedford-Euless Rd. Cleared blockage.
05/19/90 8601 Bedford-Euless Rd. Cleared blockage.
08/02/90 8747 Bedford-Euless Rd. Cleared blockage.
08/03/90 8600 Bedford-Euless Rd. Cleared blockage.
09/04/90 8700 Bedfrod-Euless Rd. Cleared blockage.
09/05/90 8600 Bedford-Euless Rd. Cleared blockage.
10/17/90 8600 Bedford-Euless Rd. Cleared blockage.
11/09/90 8601 Bedford-Euless Rd. Cleared blockage (sewer backup caused
traffic accident).
11/12/90 8601 Bedford-Euless Rd. Cleared blockage.
11/13/90 8601 Bedford-Euless Rd. Cleared blockage.
12/09/90 8600 Bedford-Euless Rd. Cleared blockage.
12/20/90 8601 Bedford-Euless Rd. Cleared blockage.