HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1991-06-10 Agendas
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
. .
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 10, 1991 - 5:45 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820.
! NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
1. Request for Reconsideration of "No Parking"
Zone on Wuliger Way - Councilman Welch
(Agenda Item No. 21) (5 Minutes)
2. Discussion of Joint Elections - School District,
County, City - Councilwoman Spurlock (10
Minutes)
3. Renaming of Glenview Center to Dan Echols
Senior Citizens Center - Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet
and Councilman Garvin (5 Minutes)
4. Appointment of Charter Revisions Study
Committee - Mayor Brown (5 Minutes)
5. PZ 91-08 Public Hearing for Consideration of an
Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1080
Regarding Parking Dimensions - Ordinance No.
1738 (Agenda Item No. 12) (5 Minutes)
6. IR 91-59 Request from City of Watauga Regarding
V oluntary Contributions to the Park and Library
Fund (10 Minutes)
7. PZ 91-11 Request for Appeal Hearing on Tract 7, John's
Addition - Bank of North Texas (Agenda Item No.
15) (5 Minutes)
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
Page 2
! NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
8. PS 91-07 Request of Tecnol, Inc. for Replat of Lots 5R &
6R, Block 1, N.R.H. Industrial Park Addition
(Located on Industrial Park Boulevard east of
Rufe Snow Drive) (Agenda Item No. 19)
(5 Minutes)
9. GN 91-81 Lone Star Gas Rate Increase Request - Ordinance
No. 1742 (Agenda Item No. 25) (5 Minutes)
10. GN 91-85 Proposed Use of CDBG Funds for Human
Services (Agenda Item No. 29) (5 Minutes)
11. IR 91-64 Bedford-Euless Road from S.H. 26 to Airport
Freeway; Right-of-Way Acquisition (10 Minutes)
12. GN 91-84 Richfield Park Lighting Project (Agenda Item No.
28) (5 Minutes)
13. Other Items
14. Work Session (5 Minutes)
IR 91-63 Joint P & Z/City Council Workshop
15. *Executive Session (15 Minutes)
a. Personnel
b. Briefing on Pending Litigation
c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition
116. I Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. i I
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is
contemplated, it will be taken in open session.
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rl
~
II
'1
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JUNE 10, 1991
For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion
and/or action.
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN I
1. Call to Order I
2. Invocation I
3. Pledge of Allegiance I
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting May 13,
1991
5. Presentations by Boards & Commissions
Parks and Recreation Board Minutes
6. Special Presentation of "Landscape of the
Month" Award for the Month of May,
1991
7. Special Presentation of "Yard of the
Month" Awards for the Month of May,
1991
8. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent
Agenda
9. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by
Asterisk (18, 20, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29 &
30)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
Page 2
! NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
10. PZ 91-07 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request of Northridge II
Joint Venture to Rezone Lot 1R and
Lots 27 through 110, Block 4, Northridge
Addition, from R-6-T-PD Townhouse
Planned Development to R-3 Single
Family Residential (Located at the
Northeast Corner of Harwood Road and
Bob Drive)
! 11. I Ordinance No. 1737 I I
12. PZ 91-08 Public Hearing for Consideration of an
Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No.
1080 Regarding Parking Dimensions -
Ordinance No. 1738
13. PZ 91-10 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request of the City of
North Richland Hills to Rezone 37 Lots
in Diamond Loch Addition from R-5-D
Duplex to R-1 Single Family Residential
14. Ordinance No. 1739
15. PZ 91-11 Request for Appeal Hearing on Tract 7,
John's Addition - Bank of North Texas
16. PZ 91-12 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request of Oscar Trevino,
Jr. with J.L. Steele, Inc. to Rezone Lots 1
& 2, Block 2, Meacham Addition, from
R-2 Single Family Residential to C-2
Commercial (Located on the West Side
of Smithfield Road between Guy Street
and Arthur Drive)
17. Ordinance No. 1740
I;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
~I
Page 3
! NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
*18. PS 91-05 Request of Keith & Jo Ellen Anderson
for Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, KLA
Addition (Located on the East side of
Crane Road south of Amundson Road)
19. PS 91-07 Request of Tecnol, Inc. for Replat of
Lots 5R & 6R, Block 1, N.R.H.
Industrial Park Addition (Located on
Industrial Park Boulevard east of Rufe
Snow Drive)
*20. PS 91-08 Request of Birdville I.S.D. for Final Plat
of Lot 1, Block 1, Green Valley Addition
(Located at the Northeast Corner of
John Autrey Road and Keller-Smithfield
Road)
21. Request for Reconsideration of "No
Parking" Zone on Wuliger Way -
Councilman Welch
22. GN 91-65 Approve "No Parking" Zone on Wuliger
Way - Ordinance No. 1729
*23. GN 91-79 Contract with Attorney for the City
*24. GN 91-80 Appointment to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and Capital Improvement
Advisory Committee
25. GN 91-81 Lone Star Gas Rate Increase Request -
Ordinance No. 1742
*26. GN 91-82 Name for New Street from Holiday Lane
to TECNOL
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
...
Page 4
! NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
*27. GN 91-83 Proposed Write-Off Delinquent Personal
Property Tax Accounts
*28. GN 91-84 Richfield Park Lighting Project
*29. GN 91-85 Proposed Use of CDBG Funds for
Human Services
*30. PU 91-17 Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way for
Crane Road Sanitary Sewer
Improvements
31. Citizens Presentation
I 32. I Adjournment I I
POSTED
¿(:; -{p- 91
Date
___:;.ï~ J!!!l-
~fin';e
-...-.....,......-........
C:ity Sccr.~;L~n¡
F?_~L~ -.
. --__.- ..... 00_._" "_' _....... ." ...... ...~........ ,,,,....
I'
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No.
IR 91-59
'5;j~ Date: June 3, 1991
c:::::::: .
¡:Jr Subject: Voluntary Contributions to the Park and Library Fund
Reference the letter you have received from the Mayor of Watauga.
Attached is a tabulation of the voluntary contributions made by the
citizens of Watauga and citizens of North Richland Hills for the
previous 12 calendar months.
Respectfully submitted,
\
\ /
, '} .4,::''''.^A-lJ..r.-A,..{Y'~
DennJ.s Horvath
Deputy City Manager
DH:ph
Attachment
,"oW
- ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I
Ie
I
I
I
I May 1990
I June 1990
July 1990
I August 1990
September 1990
I October 1990
~OVember 1990
ecember 1990
I January 1991
February 1991
I March 1991
I April 1991
I
I
I
il
Ie
I
WATAUGA'S PARK AND LIBRARY
CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE
LAST 12 CALENDAR MONTHS
Total # of Accounts
Accounts Paying P&L % Amount
Paid Contributions Paid P&L Paid
5,439 2,170 33.7 $ 2,170.00
6,315 2,210 33.6 2,120.00
4,455 1,380 31.0 1,380.00
8,178 2,534 31.0 2,534.00
6,236 1,791 28.7 1,791.00
5,639 2,014 30.3 2,014.00
5,652 1,947 29.2 1,947.00
6,484 1,868 28.8 1,868.00
6,649 1,993 29.0 1,993.00
5,871 1,682 28.6 1,682.00
6,597 1,852 28.0 1,852.00
6,942 2,007 28.9 2,007.00
Total Cycle I - Watauga $23,358.00
I
Ie
I
I
I
I May 1990
I July 1990
I August 1990
September 1990
I October 1990
November 1990
le>ecember 1990
June 1990
January 1991
I February 1991
I March 1991
I
I
I
I *
I
Ie
I
April 1991
NORTH RICHLAND HILL'S PARK AND LIBRARY
CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE
LAST 12 CALENDAR MONTHS
Total # of Accounts
Accounts Paying P&L % Amount
Paid Contributions Paid P&L Paid
14,746 6,748 45.7 $ 6,748.00
13,945 6,240 44.7 6,240.00
11,818 2,869 24.2 2,869.00 *
16,384 7,319 44.6 7,319.00
13,003 6,047 46.5 6,047.00
15,525 6,864 44.2 6,864.00
13,686 5,959 43.5 5,959.00
14,798 6,534 44.1 6,534.00
15,016 6,406 42.6 6,406.00
13,570 5,920 43.6 5,920.00
14,306 6,214 42.8 6,124.00
15,532 6,857 44.1 6,847.00
Total Cycle II, III, IV - NRH $73,887.00
TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS $97,245.00
---------
---------
In July 1990 the new utility billing software came on-line. For the
first cycle park & library donations did not appear on the bill.
$2,000 was deducted from the next USTI billing and was transferred
directly to the Park and Library Fund.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
7101 WHITLEY ROAD * WATAUGA, TEXAS 76148 * (817) 281-8047
May 30, 1991
Honorable Mayor Tommy Brown
and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 Northeast Loop 820
P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Tx 76182-0609
Dear Mayor and City Council:
Please let this letter serve as a formal request to your city
government for the remittance of the one dollar voluntary Park
and Library fee collected from Watauga residents on the monthly
water billing service to the City of Watauga. The fee in question
has caused the citizenry of Watauga great concern due to the fact
that those who still patronize the North Richland Hills library
are charged a non-resident user fee. The voluntary fee was
appropriate during the time our citizens utilized the North Richland
Hills Library and Park facilities. Now, however, that the City of
Watauga has been able to provide these services to its citizens it
is only appropriate that any fee collected by your city for these
services should be sent back.
Please have your staff contact the City of Watauga staff to facilitate
the transfer of the aforementioned funds.
Sincerely,
£ ~.'( A~>:~, ... -;.,0' /",. ,
t._ f . _.._ /'
. '~~.I' . r i -7'-í"~"'~~/f-----·
Virg.iJ. R. Anthony, Sr'~·)
Mayor
City of Watauga
VRA/rms
Attachment: Minutes of Council meeting May 28, 1991
cc: ~~dger Line, City Manager, City of North Richland Hills
W.E. Keating, City Manager, City of Watauga
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
'1
I
I
I
f'
I
Minutes
Watauga City Council
Regular ~leeti11g
May 28, 1991
Page 2
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
1. Councilman Dollarhide moved to accept and approve the reduced
rate increase as recommended by McMorries and Associates and as
approved by the Fort Worth City Council with the amended "weather
normalization adjustment." Councilman Lehrke seconded the motion
which prevailed by the following vote:
AYES: Lohrke, Bailey, Eisenhauer, Dollarhide, Davis, Jeffries,
Stiller
NOES: None
* * *
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Councilman Bailey moved to nominate Mayor Pro tern Bob Dollarhide
as voting representative to the North Central Texas Council of
Governments General Assembly for 1991-92. Councilman Eisenhauer
seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
AYES: Lohrke, Bailey, Eisenhauer, Dollarhide, Davis, Jeffries,
Stiller
NOES: None
-;" -;" -;"
2. Councilman Lohrke moved to award the bids for copiers as follows:
The copier for Parks & Recreation to Tarrant Business Systems in
the amount of $1,824.00, the copier for the Library to Gestetner
Corporation in the amount of $4,706.00, and the copier for DPS
to Minolta Business for a rental of·$149.91 per month plus .0099
per copy service/maintenance agreement fee. Councilman Dollarhide
seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
AYES: Lohrke, Bailey, Eisenhauer, Dollarhide, Davis, Jeffries,
Stiller
NOES: None
For a tabulation of bids received see attached Exhibit "A".
* ;" *
5. Councilman Eisenhauer moved to instruct the City Manager to draft
a letter to the City of North Richland Hills to request that the
optional one dollar fee collected on the water bill from Watauga
residents be returned to the City of Watauga. Councilman Dollarhide
seconded the motion which prevailed by the following vote:
AYES: Lohrke, Bailey, Eisenhauer, Dollarhide, Davis, Jeffries,
Stiller
NOES: None
..,,, ;1, ;',
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
~I
<j
1--
il
i'
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. IR 91-61
Date:
June 10, 1991
Subject:
BURSEY ROAD from Rufe Snow Drive to Kandy Lane
A mistake was made in the title for Agenda Item #24 (PU 91-09) on May 13, 1991
concerning a right-of-way purchase on the proposed subject road project. The
parcel designation for this purchase from the Palmers was shown as "Parcel
#17" and should have been "Parcel #7". We apologize for the error.
Respectfully submitted,
i kens, P.E.
blic Works/utilities
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
'I
rl
I
I
I
I
f'
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. IR 91-65
Date: June 5, 1991
Subject: Coinprehensi ve Planning Meetings
The update to the Master Comprehensive Plan is proceeding as
anticipated. You may recall that the planning process included
the development of sector plans for the five major areas of the
city. For your information I have enclosed a brochure showing
the boundaries of the five sectors. Public meetings are being
scheduled to allow citizens from each sector to identify areas of
concern within their particular sector and to provide input into
the planning process.
Notices will be placed in the Sunday newspaper prior to each
sector meeting to provide public notice of the meetings. In
addition, notices will be posted on the City electronic sign at
the Recreation Center and a special notice placed on City Cable
36. Each meeting will be held at city hall. Members of the
Planning and Zoning Commission will be attending these meetings
and the City Council is certainly welcome to attend. The
following is the schedule for these sector meetings.
Tuesday, June 18th - 7:00 P.M. Sector One
Tuesday, June 25th - 7:00 P.M. Sector Two
Tuesday, July 16th - 7:00 P.M. Sector Three
Tuesday, July 23rd - 7:00 P.M. Sector Four
Tuesday, Aug. 13th - 7:00 P.M. Sector Five
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HilLS. TEXAS
z 00
~.
< ~
~ ~
~ ~ ==
== ~
~ ~
C== Z
0 ;> .~ <
1!:!:!::1 ~ ~ ~ ~
00 t;:S 0
~ z ~ ==
e:s .!") ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ u ~
< ~
~ .....
~ == u ~
~ ö ~
(~~1 ~ ~
z ~ ==
~
< ~ E-4
~
0 0
u z
'0 :, Sf ~ C 1:: ~
æCUOOGo)ooc:
:a=U~e::s~
U Go) v ~ c.. e ..-4
..-4 .8 ~ ~,g 0 ~
~ «)~ Go)-='"
"Ê~~~~;~
ZOCO~~~~c:
Go) 0 ., 0
· .... 0 · .-4 "'" · ~
~~...tco~~
~·ë ~ ~.5 ~ ·ë
.~ e ~ 9 a æ e
u o~ ..é'd~ 0
«) u ~ SQ.. CI) u
-s.~ 0 ·c -¡ .s .~
~ rS 8 ~ ~ cowS
~ C+-4 c:.5 ~
8 ::3 rn 0 ~.~ 0
..... U CI) (I) > CI)
rJ')c:..c....Go)~....
. VJ~ ::s ... £ ,.c .8
o ~..... ..... ~ e
u~ëCl)~~
o ~"O :9 co e
U ü fi·5 S'o.S CI)
.~ 4) .~ g 9 [rS
=..su 8"0 ~ ~
~ ~ .š C,) ~ ø...~ ..
'g'3 ~-š ¡ð~~ ~
N ..... ,&J !3 ~.;; "0
00·$ ~ 0 c::a....... c
o ~..... u ~ é'd
.$ c.. 0 VJ = 0
a ~ ..0 §.g ~ ~.~
!! "0 .:: .~ ... ~ u
^. .~ ON ~ > ~ ~.
,.... "0 ..... . ~ ~ CI)
«) ¿g'C c:B -5 CI)-5
~ æ.s e ~.; ~ ~
Q
Z
<
~z
2:0
ZÞ-C
ZVJ
<~
~~
~~
~o
=u
E--
~~
OZ
....-
VJZ
~o
~N
=
~
~
~
1~ r .....
~
æ
¡ .~ '8
e .c: B
.= u ~
~CI)~~~
u .~ ~ ~ ==
'-" > .- 0
~'-"5~u
g:9~Coc
.... CI) 0 0
lXIilXl~Q
~ ~ 5
~"OQ
~ '>
~
Q
.$ ~.$ e.~
~.C: co 0 =
~:s.8(.)::s
VJ "0 0 Go) e
cu..........VJ8
Q)&:S~o
>~o.....u
~ . ;;;;¡ >- ....
.c:....COQ)~
g g.~ ~ ë:
>- ~ .5 ~ ~
rJf co.... e
si~oæ
:c .-g~
"O~~~~
æ ~.::: rn CI)
~ a·c: .,.c
.c:C(J~'"
.~ CI) ~ 0 0
ø::: >. ~... ëÐ
-= ~ .~ .8 ~ =
t::-:= tÛ -0 5 ei
Zo~oe~e .s
cu·.... e
~~~>o ~
O~CI)eu ~
~ ~ ~ -=
.~ ~ æ CI) ~ ..
u .;;..c ~..c =
Q) c: ..... ~... e
-S~~VJ~ i
~ ~ eo CI) >- ....
o a.. .s c.. ~
= e.~ ~ 8 ~ E
~8~~C'CSCI) ~
.~ 4) 8 :; ~ [ g
~-soc.. 0 fJ
"'SCl)~
~ ... a... ... CI) e
C'd U3 ... = >
VJ ..c.~ C'd ~ Q) CQ
<~.s.seQ_
....
.5 .£
~=
~~
~:;
c..&:
r
r;,' .""..,
L,··.~..~j
r~ ,.:~ ..-. ':'
'. .' ."'"
(.::;;- ~ J ...,,"'
"'~"""""""'.-'f"""
(-:~--~
~
>
..... .
VJ
c::
~
.c
~
0..
e
o
U
,
e
Q..
-0
æ
oW
c:
§
()
t1)
oW
t'!
o
~
o
()
.5
o
.....
VJ -0
S æ
:t:
-0
æ
:a
()
~
-E
o
z
VJ
oW
· ....
Ol)
c::
· ....
.....
C'd
-0
Co.
::s
CI)
· ....
VJ
.~
u
. ....
......
o
0..
.....
c:
ê
='
()
....
()
~ ~
~ ~
oW
U g
t1) æ
e: ø:
4) ~ , I
~ ...... 0 · ....
~";Q: (.)
~ on'~
~·ü c: Q..
C &·š g
=' VJ êa "0
o c: Q. (1)
U (1) 00
.. ~ ~ ~
æ t1) ~ 0
t:: > .;;¡ (.)
C'd C'd c:
Eo-- ..c: ~ Go)
~ § u ~
C'd ...... Q.) VJ
Q.) Q... .c ......
..c: (1) .... :-:::
~ > f+-t ::c
o ..... 0
Z CI) ~ "0
5 c:: æ
.s ~ :2 :g
~ 0.. ~ ~
c: e ~
(1) 0 4) .c
J=·U.c 1::
.... 0
t1) 4) Z
..c: >
: 0 .5
o >
VJ .$
~
~
~
4)
~
o
~
....
c::
(1)
e
c..
o
......
(1)
>
4)
"'0
"0
~
....
(.)
4)
.~
CI)
c::
o ~
... . ....
...
~ u
c:
.~ cIS
VJ CI)
~ ~
"'0 U
¿ "0 0. "0 .c
> ~ 0 0, 00
... "0 ='
'0 ~ ..... 0
> ~ ~ ~ ~
.53 VJ ... ~ ...
c: .-=·2 -0
~ =' tU ~
N e ~ ~
.;:: e...... 0
U 0...... >
() .~ .5
~ ~
~ ~ e
~ 8 8
o 8 ~
f'l Q..
~ .~ æ
~ .c (.)
... ...
.53
"'0
æ
æ.
......
Q..
~
..c:
....
cIS
VJ
~
u
e
Co. ~
co-5
.5
c
~
......
ø..
~ en
~ c: 5
~ ~ ..... .~
.... c:: ....
~=.c 0u
> oW·'::
..... .~ .;: C'd
~ ~ 0.. ,,;..
.... c: · .... V1' ·
00" (.) VJ
i3 .':: 5 .€ 8
~ ~.~ C'd 8
e ·ü ~ Q.. c..
8 .~ 8 .2 ~
4) 0.. ~ C'I') ..
.c "'0 ~ (1) ='
; æ VJ :E' ~
..... .~ c: 00
..... (.) =' ='
4) C :.::: ~ 0
~ ~ 0 0 ~
Q.. e Q.. Q.. ....
-5ce~¿~
:Eš8":~'ª
~g.4).s-sæ
.~ 73 .;; 0 a -0
u~oæ~æ
4) "0 ..... 0 CI.) c
.s ...... ~ .... a .~
~ .~ ~ ~ 0 ü
o ~ ... ::s ~ .g
..... .c: - 5 "0 "0
50"~æ~CI)
8 <L) ...... ...... ...., (1)
::s ..c: ::I 0,) C'd "0
() ..... () C .a ->
.g~.~~ ~ ~
4)~=O(ld~
§ ~ 0 ~.~
4)0.. ~§>.
-Sf~§ø:Õ
CI) <L) ~ ..= CI.) . ~
..... > = ~ > "'"
.... 0,) ..... . ~ . .... .c:
.... CI'J .- t: CI'J ...
~~g0,)5~
C'd"O..c:..c
t1) "0 t1) ... Go) ~
> :.::: c CI'J ~ · ....
.~ ~ 0 ..... ë-S
5§Sæo,o
~ f.) .s s: ~ ~co
c.. 0 ~ 4) ..c
e ... .w. > ...
o !1 U .~ § e
u ~ t1) 5 ..... =
t1) (1) i3 ..c: :6 .~
tC ... C+-. ~ "0 . ~
~ ~ 0 Q.. co (.)
..
~
......
(1)
.....
C'd
e
· .....
...
......
::I
VJ
4)
· ....
(.)
· ....
......
o
c..
.....
c
CI.)
e
0...
o
......
4)
>
CI.)
"'0
"0
C
cu ....:
. ....
CI) ()
c:: §
.~ 0
.~ u
~ >.
"0 .~
U
co t1)
.53 ..c:
c:: ...
o ~
N ,&J
~ "0
o (1)
CoM ~
o
~~
. .... "'-I
, ....
e c
o (1)
u e
~ e
~ ~
"'0 0
(1) 0
~ ~
(1) g
-s~
"0 ~
~ ~
~~
c:: CI.)
o ..c
(.) ...
~~
--'=....
MÑ
cu ...
...... ~
.~ c..
co C'd
~ ..c:
......u
(1)
! cO 4)
CI'J r:: -s
. ....
"0 C
i æ
......s:
C'd
.... t1)
~ >
"0 · ....
~ ~
..c (1)
... ..c:
~ [
v;
>.
C'd
~
00
.5
~
o
......
~
(1)
.c
.....
~ ~ (1) 0,)
(1) · .... ..c: "0
..c: c: f-c 0
~ ~ u
o..~ :i c
§ ~ !:! Q)
u .c: ~ ê
C'd 1:: ~ (1)
~ ~ ~ ~
.g~Eo
C'd 01) >. ......
o .5 ·E ~
..... c:: 0 0
~æ-=~
° ~ =' ~
.,Q .... C'd cu
...... ~ 01) Þ<
~ 0 c (1)
0.. 4) · .... f-c
·ü c.. § .~
·8 ~ N ~
e .~ '"; ~
.c .9- 0
ë;j ..... (.)
(.) ~ .,... c:
oc.Sco
...... ='. ....
~ e 0
.-= t1) 0
~ .::: rJ)
o ....
..c
=' 0
< .6
CI)
a
r:
='
o
g æ
(1) s:
4)
'g ~
U -;;1
01)
c
. ....
~
.,Q
C'd
"'0 C
~ Q,)
e 01)
~ .~
o 0
U N
I
c::
o
N
"'0
æ
00
.5
~
......
ø..
v
.c
.....
~
o
CI)
co
.5
.....
(1)
(1)
e
¿
o
. ....
en
CI'J
V ·ë
-5 e
"0 0
c: U
~
..... 01)
..... c
< . ,...
e
I
.~
"0
CO
.53
c::
2 §
o s:
.s v
~ .~
æ ~
...... 0
v ..c:
-0 ~
.> ~
.... E
-0 0
~u
e ~
o
CI) ....
... c..
;3 °
e ~
5 æ
ð .s
CO · ....
...... ~
~ 8
·ü æ
·8 -0
::s ~
e 8
~ ~
.s .5
CI) en
(1) .....
-:: u
~ ·E
CI)
01)
.5
.....
Q,)
e ¿
~ ~
o ~
'0 Q.)
(1) CO
~ .s
§ ~
~~
o (1)
.c .s
-E CO
o .2
~ ='
V "'0
-5 "0
"'0 ~
c:: ='
Go) ~
:: -5
< VJ
e
I ...... I ...... CI) ~ CI) c: t1)
(1) C'd ~ ~ ~ c c ° ..c
~ u .~·õ (1) C'd ..... .....
·s .ë;; ~ VJ ..... e s: (is CI)
~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0... ~.....
~ ~u 0... Q..~ ~ (.) ....
01) (1) v 0,) -g ~ .;¡; ~ ~
.5 .s ~ ..c:: é'd (1) c:: "'0 ~
~... ~Q)c
2 g f+-t t1) elf...... ...c: é'd
C'd "... 0 c.. Go) 0 ~ .. >...
~ c:: v ~ > - ....
Q.. · ,... C1) ..c: ..c' ~ Q.. CO · 2
...... ~ =' CI) u .~ e .8 ='
C'd 0 V o...~ ~ Uo t: e
00 0 ~ ...... -- =' ° 8
~ ~ ·C ~ 0 ~...... ~ 0
~..... g. ° ~-o ~ ..U
VJ (1) .... ..... ~ æ ~ ÞO
~ ~ §: 0,) ~ 0.5 ~
tI)~<:94)§"'~:
.;:: VJ ='..c:.'= 5 t1) 0
~ CI'J ~ 00 ..... ~ c ......
~ .~ C'd .~ 0 .~ ,0 ~
§ · .... U (ij..... ...: c::
is: ~ ~......... ~ ~ (1)
~~....§~f-ce~
~ 'g = ..... () c ~ 8 ~
.éi) 0 0 ~ ~ a::s (1)
c ~ .~ =' Go),~ ~ ..c:
v V1'¿ ....... 0 ~..c: ~ .~ ...
~ ~ .~ ..... ..... ... v ~ ....
~ C'd 0 .~ u ~ -s ~ ~
~ eo.."'" .....
§o"'cc~580~
U ~ C'd..... =' ~ ~ c::
~(1)Q:~c ~(1)
~ .: [ 4) 0 .s -g ê
~ ..: .s .:: -s .c ~ ~ 8 ~
:E 5 ~ ¡g ~ :E g. g 'g ~
~ e~~ co~ ~~ Go) ð
~
o
~
.;;
. ....
~
æ
......
ø..
"'0
~
o
c..
e
c..
v
..c:
...
01)
.5
~
:s
(.)
CI)
CI'J
. ....
Q
e
~
o
.D
..c:
00
. ....
(1)
c
¿
~
~
4)
eo
r::
.~
ø:
4)
>
. ....
CI)
c
(1)
..c:
~
Q..
8
C'
CJ
.~
.;¡
~
o
e
.¡
-0
fä
ë;j
o
co
CI}
.....
= .....
~ Þ<
"0 ~
~ .~ = .
::s~~õ
-c=8~
¡ < 0 ~
'-~
, 0-0
e ...... c
::s~~
c ~ CJ'.)
c bb §
.9 os ..=
~. .!S
~ ~ ::s ·
:s "0 ~ "0
g.~ &~
c..~ u
þoc..~..s
.~ ~ ~ .B
· ..... CJ'.) ...-4
~ U (:$ =
~ .9À ~
~~eCJ'.)
..... ~ Q" =
c G) ~ .s
~~::=~
..... ... ~ '3
E3~cg.
~ ~~ ~
~ ø.. ~
æ æ G.) ~
is:''O-=.z;
G.) æ § ~
.~ ..... ~
CJ'.) >.. ~ ..c:
= .~ "0 ~
rI,gU~v
.. ~ Go) e . S
-= ~..c:~ e
Q. e..... $-e
~ 0 ~ uS ~
QU~ ~.g
o G.) CI) C=
E ~ $-e cd
~ ~ .8 ~ .~
.~ ~
.~ -0 ;
.<3 cu :;
~ J:i ·e
~ . (ij
~ '"8 ~
· .... 0 CI)
= .c G)
~ ] .~
~fo~
o ·43 -S
~ = C+-.
.8 .= 0
~ .~
.8 -= ~
..... g ë;
1i) æ
~ -g
G) :;
= ...
~ .g
:a ~
G.) 0
-S 8
= c'd
~ ~
:s 0
~==
.5 ~ c!
~ 0
~ := ..:::
~ ~ u
o .w G.)
· .... CI)
g .. ~
U) 5 .s
= ..:::
~ :a g
~
u
Go)
CI)
Go)
>
¡.;::
o
.....
.$
ãš
"0
. .....
>
. .....
"0
c:
.8 v
"0
~ .>
..c: e
~å
~ ~
i ~
:a 9
o 0
Ø3 ~
~o g
.5
~ ã
o .....
. >. .~
..... >
. .... . ....
U ~
U)
~ '~
.....c G.) · ~ ·
~ -S § ·E
eo..... CI)
c.......~~
~ C ~ .5
>8~-o
~ .~ ~ æ
"O.~ ..
~ : .~ ~
~ 0 G3 ~
]'8~~
~o.äo
.c~~u
~,/:)~....:
..... ..c: ::= . ~
::s .~ ~ c
~:gæ:9
.~ ø: p
~ ~ G.) ....
~ ..c: > ....
e ..... · ..... ..s
8 .$ ~
c..c: v ~
o .~ .c ......
u~~::a
~ ......
~..:e:9
~ 0 0 .....
o U ~
-0 Go) e
f5 8
G.)
CI) uS
::s t1)
"0 CJ'.)
æ~
~ ~
'Î~~
=
o
..
.....
~
.....
r..
o
Q.
CI1
=
~
r..
~
-0
=
~
rl
r..
~
.c:
Cl)
=
o
r..
o
.c
~
è: S S B ·ë
~~ec:
< t1) t1) ~ =
e -5 ...... .~
. cu ..... Ol) G.)
·C~~4).c
. 9 ~ Ol) J:J .....
!i t1) æ ~ .ç;;
.§ oS ~ ~ ~
Q .~ ~ s 0
<J CJ'.) ..... ~ .....
! .... "0 CJ'.) ....
;:: 0 e c 0
~ 0 t1) .9 'E
='61i$co
CJ'.) 0 ~ £ .5
CI'.)"o .....
~ ~ ~ ~
"O~cr=..:
~ c .c 0
...-4 ÞO Ol):s ~
...... c ~
.~ .~ 0
~.8~
c > ..... .....
c'd e B
s:: ~ "0
~ g æ
.ëij 5 ~
C > t1)
,g . ..... ...
v 0.0 ~
~.B
E......
0=
u ~
G.) =
. f5 .g
en
"0 .
0"0
o 0
~.e
,,0 0
,C"o
co ..c:
·v .2P
¿ c v
on c..,. c
o 0 ......
..... ..... ~
..c: ::s '':::
CI) 0 C
.~ 0 .g
~ ~ .....
...-4 C+-è CI)
~~t:!~
· P ..c:
_ -'-" 7" t1)
., - ~ ,...
~ .5 '::
e ~ ~~
e t1) 0 0
o .c t1)
o ~ ~ ~
~
t
r..
u
r..
~
~
== r..
~ 0
Etj
.. ~
~Cf.)
....
CI1
~
~ ..
.c 0
..........
r.. u
o ~
ZCf.)
I I 0 I
.... en CIJ C
o ~ ...... (d
"o"O~
foo
..... t1)
o c
c: CI'.)
00"0
.5 8
c:..c
.9 S
. -= ,,0
CI)..c:
fä .2P
.... t1)
..... c
~ e
.~ t1) -;
> .c .....
e ~ c
"O.g
= V .....
.~ ~ ~
c t1) d)
c'd > ..c:
s:;.g;
G.) .B .5
.:: == .~
~ .~ .....
C1) ~ .S
..c: CIJ ~
e æ e
~...... c
E ~ .~
o ~
U cñ 0
~ æ
o .....
o .~
~ CIJ
....
=
~
e
Q.
o
~
> ,g
~ ~
~
~-
~~
~ ...
~o
~.....
- u
-0 ~
u~
...... 0
...... .....
.~ ~
CI) ::s
æ~
s:!
...: G.)
C1) c:
U 0
~ e
~ 0
-Ett::
c ~
o:ïS
:E ~
CI) · ....
æ ~
~ .5
G.) .~
-S c
...-4 0
o ..0
$-e · .....
..... CI)
§ B
<J .....
o .....
..... ~
"0'::
&~
o C1)
...... ..c:
~ ~
(1) ....
~ v
.B~
....
=
~
E
~
~
œ
=
~
~
.c
.....
~
o
r..
.....
~ ~ ¿ co
E t1) ~ .5
.. ~ c
G.) ..c: 0 0
~ ~ = N
pC:: 0 0 · ·
E-- .... · .... CI) '0
co.~ c ....
· t1) > · g .....oc:
ã38~~
t::.....d)~()
..::: ~ -5 6'0 c:
c.... C1) co
.go"O~~
..... ~ c
CI) c'd C -0
.B ~ ~.g æ
...-4 0 d) CI)
=-= co ~ .> ~
~ "0 ~ ..... c
oSæë:§ë
~ CI) 0.. CI) ~
e .~ "0 Go) ·S
oo.~ C J: ~
...... c'd .... t1)
.~ &. CI) ~ ~
.s~~ co
00 0 ~ ..c: .5
.$ c ~ <J ~
~.~ g ~ <J
C ......... en
~ g. ~.!!J ~'O
e ~ c..-. 00
~ 0 .....
$-e .....
..s~5=~
CI) e v 0
-g.g~§.~
..c: ::s · .... 0 · --
Q)u:c......'S
~ .5 ~ ~ 0
r..
o
.....
>-.
C'a
~
~
~
...
~
-= r..
.....0
=~
o ~
rIJrIJ
t
I
I
I
I
I
VJ
.....
.....
. .....
:c
"0
æ
.....
~
(J
ë2
..c
1:
o
Z
...
~
"0
.....
4)
~
.8
=
~
So
~~
VJQ..
000
.$ 0
t)..J
4)...
e ~
.... 4)
g~
(J 0
~z
~
\,)
~
..... ....
~o
::S('f")
~t'
> ..
. ..... =
"O~
.$ :t:
V >-
....
_..eö
VJ
CO
.5
.....
8
e
~
...
(J
v
CI)
'+-4
o
Ja
:J
"0
.J::
~
~
.~
ÞO
.$
~
o
......
;S
V
~
I ,I V
= C:~C:~(J
.ið~~c..i
(j .; CO 4.) .5
~ en S,J::) "C
= · CI). .......
= ::>ct;::::O
U ...~ ~ co
~ .¿ ~ ~ .~ .5
.... ~...... 4) (I) C
~ .š c..~ ~ ~
i :O-Š-g i~
i 4.)'O~~~
:..c c............
.. .......c ~ ·B c
· :=~~oo.
: ~ Q) ~ "O.~ ~
i CI).....c ~ Ql). .....
: 5Ja-"'O.8~
: ..=.....:::: c !3
: ...... U ~ ~ = 1:3
-g..... -0 · ..... ..
'0 ~ ~ Q) ~ 0.-
u;!O ~ce
-- ..... Q) 0 0
co ~ ~ .> ...... u
.~ G.> fI) A) ë G.>
...... ~ 0 ~ ~ .s
~=.s.c~f+.4
· s: .... .......... 0
g~c£:=~c
coC: ~oo
~ i 0 co ...... .~
:i : "j·i S ~ -ã
I cc..~<c
~ 4) 0 ~e·;;¡ 8
~ c.. c.-. -s.
= ~.5 G.> 0 ~ .š
; ~~~ co~
., Q CI) ~ .$ ~ 1;J
..tt
~
~
S
\.)
f~
~
=
.-
....
QJ
QJ
~
~.8 ~
...........QJ
ø..:o:=æ
o ~ =
..c (1).4)
.....00
"'Oc-=
æ·= ~
~~
~ e VJ
o .....
..... 0 c::
~(I)~
tI) ~ .;¡;
0: ~
';:04)
f+.40..c
o CI) .....
en 0'0
c e- CI)
~æ~
...... 0
en . co
~c:.....
o c
.s.r¡; 4)
...... en e
~·ë ~
:SSQ3
4) 0 >
-=U~
.8 Ol) 4)
..... · $ .s
¡ ~.M
~ "'0 ê
.$ æ £
~coQJ
05"0
~. 0
~C:...
...
=
....
V
QJ
en
....
en
...
~
!
:
.
....
en
=
~
=
..,:
~
:;
~
QJ
=
=
.,
....
o
.....
(J
<1.)
r/)
~
~
u.
~
4)
~
00
. fII04
~
....
o
.....
(J
<1.)
r/)
V
00
<1.)
==
o
L?
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
.....
0\
0\
.....
.....
0\
0\
.....
oô
.....
.,.)
N
~
Z
::>
~
t.t.1
?3
~
tI)
QJ
.Si>
~
.....
~
...
.....
rJj
""""
(
fI')
~
-;
=
<
:
·
:
I
:
·
·
·
·
:
·
·
·
·
·
:
·
·
·
:
¡
..:
~
Q
....
y
î
QJ
~
e
QJ
....
Q.
QJ
CI.)
· ..!.. .,.!. 0
:;~...
"'0 e.o i
æ~~
rA'QJ~
c~ ~
~e.8
·ëñ .8 c
~ QJ
.......c
...... ...
0·.....
J:~S
..... CI) ~
S 4) CI) rA
e ~.~ ~
~ "; 00 0
"Oæ£co
4) ~.....
.5 fI2 ~ 5
~ ~ e
.0 c.. · c..
0·..... :s 0
c:u..........
0·2 ~ ~
·B ~rJ) ~
.~ aCl)~ c
"'0. ,. '" 0
Q) æ
~ fij f+.4 c..
· ..... ...... 0 c..
~c..~~
~1~~
~4)~C
oOOooe
U co..c:
~ .$ ..... 8.
N co e
~ :.= .5 ......
.....
en
<1.)
~
..c
1::
o
~
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
.....
0\
0\
.....
\Ò
.....
~
...J
::>
~
~
o
.....
(J
<1.)
CI)
....
o
.....
(J
u
en
"0
......
.!a
~
..c
u
i
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
.....
0\
0\
.....
~
N
~
...J
::>
~
(12
c
~
æ:
...
=
.....
y
QJ
en
~c:-::
CI)...... 0
=' 0 C
Q..=,
"OVJo
c: · ..... r \
~-S'-'
~~~
~-oö
0..<1.)
o VJ Go)
~0.,c
Q.. c.. ...
coe
5 ~-o
· c:
::=o~
¡g ~ en
G.) ..... .....
-o::=c::
CI)~~
æ CI).r¡;
Q..i~
.....
gø..o
S~..c:
· .s.....
"O~>-
~V,).t::J
~
......O~
~ ~.~
:: ~ ~
CD ...
.c":o
.....0...
:=11....
~ a) u
VJ V,) .~
. ~ ..c: J:J
coo=
£ ~ CI)
G~-o
~caæ
c
~.
...
~
·
:
·
·
·
·
: .
·
·
·
·
·
...
QJ
.c
E
GI
~
=
I
...
~
e
QJ
~
=
Z
....
o
.....
u
<1.)
en
>-
~
~
Go)
~
t.L.
.c:
:;
o
'1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
.....
0\
0\
.....
,
..... ~
::J c: 4)
Q..::s..c:::
. 53 co .....
c: ~ c:
° 0
N :J:
· ..... 0 <1.)
. -== >- CI)
(J~C:
Q,)~O
~ ~
o . CI)
o "0 Go)
¡:;;;G.)Ø:::
4).....
~.~ c
~oo
~.~
. 0... .....
CI) c.. u
e ~:
Go)..c: Go)
U (J Go)
c ::s Cl)
8 e <1.)
-o~~
cGo)~
~>c..
~.~ ~
~ c.$
· ...... 0 .....
.. ...... °
en"'" <1.)
c: ~ e
0.......
· .... 0.... .
t$ · .... 0 .....
<1.)~ts.£
=',,<1.)..c:
cr.....CI)Q..
... .... 4) 8
::s ='..d ~
o 0 ..... 0..
>- ~ "0 en
..c: c·....
.~ ~ £ -S
~~~f+.4
v't>oo
e.D.....~
000
o _ ....-4 ~
.. - \ ':.,Q .
..
M
.....
E-.:'
C/)
::>
o
;::>
«
...
Q
....
U
GI
~
-=
=
e
~
en
:
¡
·
·
·
·
·
:
·
i
:
·
:
:
·
·
·
·
·
!
;;.
'-
~
:I
-=
~
~
.
~
...
~
::I
=
~
Þ-t
.!.~~ =
4)0..... e
~ Q) en ~ .-
oSeo ë.
t)oo~ =
o~gæ -=
cn.;;o~ <
4) U ø.. =
-Sg~~ ~
'0 ~ ..... · fII04 ~
~"O~ ~
~-CG.> :
c ::s ~ ..c: =
~ ~ CI) ~ .¡:
.¡¡j j e- ~
~rAø..o =
~ i ....0· u y
.;: ..... ..... Go> .-
.... ~ 0..c ~
--....QJ..... ::I
.~ 0 rn 4) ~
~u~e :
"0 r~ 5 0 ¡
'i) VJ. U ·
-= -0 u.. .8 !
4) ~ 0 ..... :
,t:J 0 .;: == :
..... ~ 5: ~ :.
:= ~.
~ c....... ~ :
en V ¡s.~ :
CO..c ..... ..c :
52 ..... ~ ~ .:
...... c: -= ... .
~;~~ i
..... Co..8 ::s !
~ .5 == g i
o .'" ...... -0 ·
...... > ~ -=
.-= ° "0. CJ
"0 . ... en Go) >- '-
"0 U co ~.~ ~
< ~.5 "0 U ~
;b g
=
.-
.....
QJ
QJ
~
I ~ I
..... >- co
. ~...... ~
(4)c..
~ ~ e
~eo
>-3 u
.-:: ::> >-
= .-=
::s .U
1: ~ Go)
00,:::
~ ~ .....
0="0
';J Q. æ
§~CI)
· ..... ..c: c
..........~
. ..... ......
"O....ø..
~~....
c"Os
~ ..... u
o ~ 0
> en
.~ ~ Go)
U5.c
co. ...
... .....
""'oc..
=-=.....0
~-~
en . ~ ......
¡.....:o:=
ø::~~
ø.......
... ..
o e g
Y!8~
V,) t.)--.
..... Q...
~ &~ Q)
:~ 5·.... >
~. u·~
Go>C:oC:
~~-S~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
Ie
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No.
IR 91-64
Date:
June 10, 1991
Subject: BEDFORD- EULESS ROAD from S. H . 26 to Airport Freeway;
Right-of-Way Acquisition
Council members decided in a work session held on November 20, 1990 to reconstruct
Bedford-Euless Road as a 48-foot 4-lane roadway. Attached are revised cost estimates
for the reconstruction of the subject 4-lane street. The revised cost estimates
include the additional expense of approximately $98,400 for storm drain improvements
needed in Bedford-Euless Road to mitigate flooding problems near Maple Drive. Also the
three alternatives outline the fact that if we do not acquire 9.5 feet of parkway
behind the back-of-curb then the replacement of the existing water lines in Bedford-
Euless Road will have to be placed under the pavement. This could cause the City crews
repairing a leak to have to dig up new pavement relatively soon after its placement.
Alternate #1 is for no ROW acquisition, no sidewalks, and utilities relocated under the
pavement.
Alternate #2 requires the minimal amount of parkway to be acquired. Sidewalk would not
be installed and water lines could not be relocated behind the curb. With the ROW
acquisitions in Alternate #2, we would be able to establish the ROW at least 5 feet
behind the curb at locations where it now exist at the curb line or in the street. Two
properties would require ROW acquisition.
The final alternative, #3, would be to acquire at least 9.5 feet of parkway behind the
curb in all locations. This would allow relocation of water lines behind the curb and
installation of a sidewalk on both sides.
Comparison of costs for alternatives is as follows:
Estimated
Estimated Estimated Estimated Property Estimated
Alternate Construction Cost Engineering Costs ROW Costs Damage Total Costs
1 $509,400 $50,940 -0- -0- $560,340
2 $509,400 $50,940 $ 16,100 -0- $576,440
3 $552,400 $55,240 $115,120 $30,000 $752,760
The current budget approved for this CIP project is $534,886. Sufficient funds can be
made available for Alternate #1 and Alternate #2. If Council prefers to proceed with
Alternate #3, funding may be available but will require further research. Staff would
bring to Council an outline of the funding source in a proposed budget for the subject
project. This budget would be presented to Council in a future Council meeting agenda
packet.
Staff requests Council's guidance on which alternative to proceed with.
Respectfully submitted,
NO~TH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
Ie
~"I
.¡¡
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
May 7, 1991
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Dir. of Public Yorks
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820 .
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: 3-340, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BEDFORD-EULESS ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMP'VTS.
SUPPLEMENTAL PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES
As instructed, we prepared cost estimates for six (6) widening alternatives as
presented in our letter dated November 16, 1991. As further instructed, we
have prepared three (3) additional estimates based on reconstruction with the
curbs at the current location from S.H. 26 to Strummer. The existing pavement
width is 49-foot BIB, with four (4) 12-foot wide driving lanes.
SUPPLEMENTAL ALTERNATE 1:
No Additional ROY to be acquired;
No Sidewalks constructed;
Replacement of existing utilities,
or utility relocations in street, not in parkway.
SUPPLEMENTAL ALTERNATE 2:
Minimium additional ROY to be acquired;
No sidewalks constructed;
Replacement of existing utilities,
or utility relocations in street, not in parkway.
SUPPLEMENTAL ALTERNATE 3:
Full parkway widening to standard 9.5 feet;
New sidewalks on both sides' of street;
Utility relocations in parkway.
Ye have also included an estimate of an additional storm drainage pipe
extension in Bedford-Euless Road as required to alleviate a drainage problem
located north of Bedford-Euless in the vicinity of Maple and Lazy Lane. The
estimate is based on your preliminary design and costs dated April 19, 1991.
The estimated construction cost of this additional drainage system totals
$98,400.
The following is a summary of the estimated costs for each alternative
considered. The estimated right-of-way widening costs are based on
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
Ie
I
Hay 7, 1991
BEDFORD-EULESS ROAD
Page
2
T.A.D. Appraised Values for each property. The estimated construction costs
include curb and gutter, paving, retaining walls, drainage system and
sidewalks when noted. However, water and sewer adjustments are not included
in these cost estimates. Alternates No. 1 and 2 do not include new sidewalk
construction. These estimated costs do not include any estimate of damages to
adjacent property due to new curb and gutter being located closer to existing
homes or other buildings than currently located.
ALT. ALTERNATE ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED TOTAL
NO. DESCRIPTION CONST. COST ENGIN. COST R.O.Y. COST COST
1 49' Pavement
No Sidewalk
Util. in Street
No new ROY 509,400 50,940 0 560,340
2 49' Pavement
No Sidewalk
Utile in Street
Some New ROY 509,400 50,940 16, 1 00 576,440
3 49' Pavement
New Sidewalks
Util. in Parkway
New ROY Both Sides 552,400
55,240
115,120
722,760
The ROV Agent estimate of ROV purchase costs for Alternate 2 is $24,200,
compared to TAD estimate of $16,100. The ROY Agent estimate of ROY purchase
for Alternate 3 is $176,768, as compared to TAD estimate of $115,120.
The State Highway Department is planning for widening of Bedford-Euless Road
to 5-lanes. Improvements at S.H. 26 on the west end and improvements at
Strummer on the east end include widening primarily on the north side. The
design alternates included herein are based on matching the proposed Highway
Department designs at each end.
The followin~ is a discussion of each alternative.
Alternate 1
This alternate is based on reconstruction of the existing street at the
existing location (except at the ends). However, this alternate does not
include any extra parkway widening, therefore, no new right-of-way
acquistion costs are involved. There is insufficient existing parkway to
construct sidewalks along the full length of the street on both sides,
therefore, all sidewalk costs have been eliminated from this alternate.
Vithout additional parkway widening, some of the water and sewer lines
must remain in the street, rather than relocated behind the curbs. This
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
May 7, 1991
BEDFORD-EULESS ROAD
Page
3
could cause future maintenance problems if the utilities remain under the
pavemen t .
Alternate 2
This alternate is the same as Alternate 1, except two (2) parkway
widening parcels are proposed. One is Parcel No. 11, The J.C. Penney
Varehouse site, where the existing property line is in the street. The
other is Parcel No. 18, Lot 1, Block D, of the Richland Oaks Addition
located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Strummer and
Bedford-Euless Road. The existing property line of this lot is just
behind the existing curb.
Alternate 3
This alternate includes reconstruction of the existing 49-foot BIB,
4-lane section, with new curbs matching the existing locations, except at
the ends as required to match the proposed new Highway Department
designs. Extra parkway widening is proposed to provide for sidewalks and
utility relocations. The construction cost estimate for this alternative
does not include any other widening at intersections, except at the ends.
Please call if you have any questions.
,] (I J I / '
~ '- /~--,..--J l// (tf¿-~
RICHARD V. ALBIN, P.E.
ny ££ß
RVA/lld/Enclosures
cc: Hr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manager
Mr. C.A. Sanford, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Utilities
Mr. John Johnston, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks
Mr. Mark Bradley, R.O.Y. Agent
, ""-
¡ 2;J ( --t-~
,- , I
I . ¡' :.
.- I ,
N I . I'
. I . ..___.~ ~_.._
--- U\~ I : ,._____
.~ . · : ;1.:: 1
'-. .. ... . II I
1411 ,t "1
- t I ________ ______
I .
.~.J : ; · · .-- -:-. · I - - I~~ t - ... - - - - - -
: , , I C ;- I & , I · I I · 6:~ ~
~ \.' ~. . . I I . ~~-~ . . . . . _ (g~(~
~ - · · · C I · I , , · ... , I ~ttl ~ _ -
~. \. - - · .~ r·..·: · , , .Œrl®I~'G·
... -. 'I" I II' , , · , I , , j~jlID:; J
i · '''- ...- 1\ ~ I
· I · ,- ·1·1·1- · +. , I 'I'll 'I' .. ,~ .1 € Þ/::\ ~ CII '
.""'- ' "'II ! I .., I1I1 , II I' I' ' I I I "~I I I Æ :)........ ·
~ -.,- ~....~!\ ,...
- · '.. I I IJ I · , I I · , · r:;~ ~ \,
=J.:, z~ I. · '. I! I b' I I \ I , 'l~~)Ð ~.'O
~\ 9 · .' [ h. --- ""'="
-:- ~, · .' ~11"I~P<o)-··
-:- . " ' I, .....~~\\.\: ~~~\_
-:- , .. I \.") .. r ~ IV ~Iá
¡¡¡;; , · I .....- 1""1
· .. I . .4 1\'
: I ~. . · , I - ~~jt:L.:. \
S · I · tf~,,) .~
~. -. ' I [J [}..~ \
~" ... ~~(~.~
. ~.. i~~) 'œ..",
- ';/ ~ 'X. '"
. (~~~
., \-x.
I ) ..,,~
. (~.\
-- ~. ~
¡ '"
(~ ~
I ~
- - .V
1-
~ I I I I I iii
~ -hIWI :~
, Ii
I "-'
, :11
. I
I . . : ' .
~
II ~II
,
I .i..~
I
I
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I ~r--
-=-~ ... .
- .
.. ---
- .
~ -
I ~.
-=-~
- .
-=--
I - ·
2 ¡ ,
e -
I ~ ~!_. · · ~ . I
UtdC.-
I. .:] -. $ _ ~
I ' -:r · I ~ T 'fa ' 'j L .
t
I
..
....!.- -
.
. .
-:-¡~'. ..
:;:-;- ',"- : ..
-~
. .
.
I
.
~
..
I
· · i·.
: ~: II' -;- r:::;:::1 (
- I . 1 I ..¡
. ~: :'Q~
.. .-------.: ~wu \
~ r-------:: ~~ ~\.
· I 1 : u~
þ--; · I :.... u
· ., CSt
: 1 .
-:]
_I~
.\\
\
I
I
~
r-
--
~
,
I'
.~
i
:'
!~
I-
~ ~
~
¡ J
ì ~
(
~
-
I
·
·
· I
I
I ,
t
I I
I
I
~ ~
t
II.
I I
.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
May 6, 1991
BEDFORD·EULESS ROAD
Page
4
BEDFORD·EULESS ROAD
PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
RIGHT-OF-VAY ACQUISITION COST ESTIMATES
BASED ON T.A.D. APPRAISED PROPERTY VALUES
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
o
Ø)
.......
.
.......
::t:
I-
o
~
I-
Z
~
W
>
e(
Q.
CD
.......
CD
I-
8
u..
I
Ø)
.
00
0001-
W CD 00
00 a: 0
o ::J (J
Q. (J
o v
a:
Q. I-
00
X
W
:I:
o
l-
e(
~
w
~
C(
z
.,
ce C(
)( a:
. 0
I-
o
Z
ø e(
:I:
>
-a C(
c Q.
ce
o
.c C(
u 0
a:
a:
U)
.c 00
- w
... -'
o ::J
Z W
I
o
o a:
o
>- u..
o
w
o CD
Q.
.. Ø)
^w·
oo=~
wu..a:
o
00
::t:
I-
o
CD
z
o
~
z
w
o
~
>-
c( z
~ 0
~
a: 0
c( W
Q. 00
4(
CD
v
00
....
z
~
w
>
o
a:
a..
~
~
o
N
~
-'
c(
I-
o
~ I-
.1-
000
·0
a:o
ow
woo
I-e(
C(:I:
~o u..
-a:
I-::J 00
ooa.. ........
w ..
^
00
W
::J
-'
c(
>
c( .«-
a:~w
I- . a: u..
xoc(
W 00
a:
o
c(
....
·0-
c(~..t-
a: 'Ow
I-OWW
x . a:: lL.
wa::
.>--
a..c(1-
O~W
a:~w
a..a:u.
c(-
a..
. >--
I-C(I-
oo~W
-~w
Xa:LL
Wc(-
a..
·OC)-
a..t-%I-
o -w
a:CDOW
a..a:-'lL.
::J--
U:::t
CD
·OC)-
........%1-
00 -w
-CDOW
Xa:-'LL
W:::J--
O:::J
CD
00
W
l-
e(
~
W-
01-
c(w
I-W
zu..
0-
a:
lL.
I-
00
W
I-
00
o
o
z
o
I-
00
::J
o
o
c(
>-
c(
~
.
u..
o
I
I-
:I:
CJ
a:
>-
I-
a: a:
ww
a..z
~~
Q.
I-
-0
zz
::»
OOOMOO.COMcoanCOO.....OMOllan
OOO-OMCÞ.NNManO-OMOII.....
. II
OOONOO-M.anCOCOOCfto.ou.....
oo....cocoo..anNCOO......OØ)OIl&n
coo cocooan..oœ&n.....coo.....colI.
- - - - - - - -II
-N CONNO).&nO)&n...anOIlO)
.... """""""-""""-11 co
.. """
II
OOManoan<OO-O<OOOOOMO
oo......ocoCÞco.....oœoØ)CÞo&no
,0
cococooco...............&nCO.....CO.......... co..... 0
...... .........................-
o ..
..
OOO-O.ON.....COO.....OOOOOIlCO
oooCÞ&n.ananO-ManOMO&nOIl.....
. II
OOONN--MOCONCOONOCÞOIIN
oan .....M.anNCONanMOCÞOCOCOII
NN .COMNN.....CONCÞco&nan.....OIl.....
- II
II
II
00000000000000000
ooo<o&no&noanoan&nooo&n&n
NNO-".NM...CÞan&n&n..
00000000000000000
ananan&nananan&nanan&n&n~&n""&n&n
CÞCÞCÞO)œCÞCÞCÞCÞœCÞCÞØ)O)O)Ø)Ø)
00000000000000000
~~~Ø)0&n0~0&n00~~~00
..........O.....~~.....CO&n&n&nO....""~
00000000000000000
COMCO.&n-coo--ooœ-.-&n
CO.CO.....cø..O..ManCOMOO.COM
.M.....CO.....Ø).....~COCON~Ø)COMN&n
00000000000000000
COMco.an-coo--oOCÞ-.-&n
CO.CO.....CO.O.MancoMOO.<OM
.M.....co.....œ.....&nCOCONanQCOMNan
OOo.....ocoo..an.œcoocoooolI.....
OONanOMU)COMONOO..OOOII.....
. II
o~coan~anO.....M.....CO.OCOO-OII.....
ONCOCftCOCOOO.....~.....ON-O......IIN
- - - N - - .. - - N N - - - - N II 0
II
11M
II
e
-a
w U)
o Q
C C .c
U)., ....- c . >-
e-ac .-a. ~
:1:0 ce ce"'c ø 0
I- ., .- ~ - E ce c N c (/)
::JC ~~... .cøoCJ. ., ce
0,- ., 0 m ce.c - .-.. a: Q.....,. Q .,
U) ce.. -' - u ce ::I .- . .. ce Q..-
- >- . ., ... .c 0 - >- > . -a .- a:.- c ce
Q. -a -a 0 - ~.- .- C·- 0,- c ... c
ce ~. .-.c.. ce.c 0- .:::1 ....-- e 0
oa:a:a..C(OO-'OI-O~Nw~U)m ....
-NM,,~co""'coœO-NM"~CO"'"
--------
O~OCOOOOOOMONan.oocoo"~
an....anocoocoancoan<OCÞ.anOCOOIIM
. II
CÞancococøNanØ)NONancooanNcøCOIIN
-COCONCO-.....~M.....MMCÞ..MocoœIlCO
&n..M.......&n-co.....cocøan~&n..........COIlCO
................................ -II
co"'" II an
....IIN
""
II
CO..... CÞ.....O N&nMCO..... COM-COCft o co.....
......CO.....O)M-M.M.-NO-M.N
OOOOO----------_&nCft
....................................
&n&nOOOOOOOOOOO&nOOCftOIl""
M..ooooooan&n&n&nOCOOO.....NIlCO
. II
CftOO..OOOONNNN~CftOOCftOIlCO
NMCO""".ONCOCOcøCOCftO&n"Ø)M"..
-co~&n~~an-~~&n~"&n"&nanCOIIN
II
II
II
000000000000000000
&n&nooooooan&n&n&nan&n&n&n&n&n
~............-...................
000000000000000000
&n&n&n&nan~&nan&n&n~an~&n&n&n&n&n
CftCftO)Ø)Ø)Ø)O)cþØ)O)O)Ø)O)Ø)O)O)O)Ø)
000000000000000000
oO~&n~~an&noooooooooo
N&n~~~an~co~~&n~~an&n~~""
000000000000000000
ONO~<O"COO<O&n.coco.coo__
-CftNCOCOCO-M".-COM~ano--
Ø)&n~CONNNN---NMMM ..........
000000000000000000
ONO&nCO"COOCO~"coco"coo-_
-CÞNCOCOCO-M...._COM&n&nO--
œ~~CONNNN___NMMM ..........
COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO-QIlCO
&n-o~ooOOOOOOOMOO&n.II'"
·11
oooco&n~~o~an&n~OMOO&n.II"'"
an..MMMNNNNNN--ON&nCOIlCO
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M - II &n
..
IIN
II
w
o
(/) 0
Q.
:I: cc . 0
I- 0,- 0 0 0 Z
a: -~--
o 0 ........ .,.,.., ø
Z>-o..,.c-...,.,c .,...ue
"'uce»..O>-.E»-~ ce
"'Q>.-~--cc""'-ce.e-c
...>-ceoooooce:::l.,-a..-:::I 0
....OO~CDN~~~~oowc(a:a:O(/) ....
COQO-NM.~CO""'COCÞO-NM.~
--NNNNNNNNNNMMMMMM
Cft
o
o
N
an
..
M
..
co
0)
N
N
~
N
&n
0)
an
&n
.
"C
U)
00
W
o
(/)
:r:
I-
o
m
00
-'
c(
I-
o
....
.c
l-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
May 6, 1991
BEDFORD-EULESS ROAD
Page
5
BEDFORD-EULESS ROAD
PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
RIGHT-OF-YAY ACQUISITION COST ESTIMATES
BASED ON R.O.V. AGENT COST ESTIMATES
CONFIDENTIAL
THESE TABLES FOR COUNCIL AND STAFF
INFORMATION ONLY
I-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
lie
I
o
CÞ
.......
..
.......
^
J:
t-
o
~
...
z
~
W
>
C
a.
m
.......
m
...
8
u.
,
0)
..,
c
W
en
o
a.
o
a::
a.
v v
W
CJ
c
z
.
cw C
)( a:
e a
...
o
z
. c
:J:
>
-,:, C
c: CL
co
o
s:. C
u 0
a::
a:
en
s:. en
- w
... ...J
o ::J
Z W
I
o
o a::
o
>- u.
a
w
o CD
C
N
~
~
a.
. . CÞ
^w..,
en=~
wu.a::
o
en
:r: ^
t-
O en
CD w
::J
Z ...J
o C
>
~
z
w
o
~
>-
<t
~
::.:::
a::
c
a.
en
CD
a::
::J
o
...
en
x
W
:J:
o
...
c
:i
v
en
...
z
~
w
>
o
a::
a.
:i
~
...J
C
t-
o
~ ...
.....
oen
·0
a:: 0
ow
wen
...c
cc::r;
:i0 u.
-a::
"'::J en
eno. .......
w ..
...
z
w
~
c(
c( .c(-
a:~w
... .a::u.
xocc:
w en
a:
~
o
a:
z
o
c
w
en
c(
CD
en
...
en
o
o
·0-
C~·....
a:: ·Ow
...oww
x .a::u.
wa::
.>-
o.cc:....
O~w
a:::.:::w
o.a:u.
c-
o.
.>-
...ct-
en~w
-::.:::w
xa:u.
wc-
a.
·OCJ-
o....z....
o -w
a:CDOW
a..a::...Ju.
::J--
O::J
CD
·o~-
......z...
en -w
-mow
xa::...Ju.
W::J--
O::J
CD
en
w
...
c(
:I
...
en
w
....
en
o
(,)
z
o
w-
e"....
cw
...w
zu..
0-
0:
U.
>-
...
a: a:
ww
o.z
~~
a.
...
en
::J
o
(,)
C
>-
C
~
,
u.
o
I
to-
:r:
~
a:
....
-0
zz
::J
COO..,OCOO"ONCO..OOOOOIlCO
OCOCÞCNONCÞCÞCOCOOCOOOOIIM
II
OOO..,O"-CONO"-"-NO"-O..,OIlM
oO""-O)CÞ-COCOMNCOOOOMU)IIU")
"'0 COO)OOU)M&nONN-ONO)IIU")
. . - .. - -II
NM U")O)..,M..,CÞ"-U")M"-"-U)O)NIIO
.... ........-....-N.........-II..,
...... ""
II..
00000000000000000
00000000000000000
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
-----------------
..................................
OOO-O..,ON"-u)O"-COOOOIlCO
oOOO)U")"'U")U")O-('f')U")OMOU")OIl"-
II
OOONN--('f')OCONCOONOCÞOIIN
o&n "-M..,U")NCONU")MOO)OfDCOII
NN "'CO('f')NN"-CONO)COU")U")"-OIl"-
. II
II
II
00000000000000000
000U)U")0U")0U")0U")U")000U")U")
NNO-..,..,NM..,..,..,O)U")U")U")..,..,
00000000000000000
&n&nU")&nU")U")U")U")U")&nU")&n&n&nU")U")U")
o)o)CÞo) CÞCÞCÞCÞCÞ cþcþcþo)cþcþcþcþ
00000000000000000
&nU")U")0)0U")0&n0&n00&n&n&n00
"-"-O"-U")&n"-CO&n&n&nO....,..,U")U")
00000000000000000
"('f')CO..,&n-coo--oOO)_..,_&n
CO..CO"-CO..,O"('f')&nCO('f')OO..,fDM
"M"-CO"-cþ"-&nCOCON&nCÞCOMN&n
00000000000000000
COMCO..&n-COO--ooCÞ_.._U")
CO..CO"-CO.., O"C")&n CO('f') 0 0.., COM
..M"-CO"-CÞ"-U")COCON&nCÞCOM NU")
OOO"-OCOO..&n..CÞCOOCOOOOII"-
OON&nOMCOCO('f')ONOO..OOOII"-
II
O&nCO&n&n&nO"-C")"-CO..OCOO_OII"-
ONCOCÞCOCOOO"-U")"-ON_O"-"'IIN
---N- -.--NN----N " 0
II
11M
II
w
o
ene
Q
C C
....- c e >-
e -,:, c . -,:, e
:r:O CW cw...c 10
.... .- ~- EcwCN C
::JC ~~... .ceOCJe . ce
o .- 10 0 CD cw s:. - .-. a: a..... 10 e 01
en .....J - u ce ~.- e CD e ce a..-
- >- . 10 ... s:. 0 - >- > . -,:, .- a: .- C
a. "D -,:, 0 - ::1.- .- C .- 0 .- c ... c
cw ::I e . - s:. .. cw z::. 0 - .::1....- - e
Oa:a::a.c«(,)O...J(,)....O~Nw:lenCD
-NM.&nCO"-COCÞO-NM..U")CO"-
--------
COu)OOOOOOOOOOOCOOO'llllll'U)UN
..,MONooooooooOCOOOU")..,IICÞ
·11
("')..COMNNOU)OOOOU)"-ON"-NII....
OO......,C")MOCÞU")U")U")U")CÞOCO("')CÞU)II
O)U")..,·..,...,....,..,..,..M..,M..,_CÞIIN
.............. ................ -II
CÞCÞIlCO
-""("')
.. ""
..
000000000000000000
cocococococococococococococococooo
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONN
................................--
.. ..
U")U")OOOOOOOOOOOU")OOCÞOII&l')
M"'OOOOOO&l')&I')U")&I')OCOOO"-NIlCO
II
CÞoO..,OOOONNNN&nCÞOOCÞOIlCO
NMCO&n.....,ONU)U)U)COCftOU")..,CÞMII..
-U)U")U")U")U")U")-&I')U")&nU")"'U")"'U")U")COIIN
II
II
II
000000000000000000
U")U")ooooooU")&I')U")&I')U")U")U")U")U")U")
"-..,..,.....,..,..,-....,..,....,..,..,..,..,..,
000000000000000000
U")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")
CÞCÞCÞCÞ CÞCÞCÞCÞCÞCÞCÞCÞCÞOJOJOJ OJ OJ
000000000000000000
00U")U")U")U")U")U")0000000000
NU")&nU")U")U")U")coU")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")U")
000000000000000000
ONOU")CO..coOU)U")..,coco..coo__
-O)NCOCOCO-M....-COMU")U")O__
O)U")&nCONNNN---NMMM "-"-
000000000000000000
ONOU")CO..,COOCO&l')"coco",coo__
-CÞNCOCOCO-M.....-COMU")U")O__
CÞ&nU")CONNNN--_NMC")M "-"-
COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO_CÞIlCO
U")-oU")oooOOOOOOMOOU"),,"..
II
ooocoU")U")&nOU")U")U")U")OMOOU")",""-
U")....MMMNNNNNN--ONU")COIlCO
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M - .. U")
II
IIN
..
e
-,:,
en
w
o
en
o
a.
e
o
.J:
::I
o
en
:x: cc
t- 0·-00
a: -~--
o 0 e....... ..e.
Z ~ 0 If) . z::. .- e e . . c .., CD CD u e
... u cw > > CD e 0 >- CD E > >._ ~
"'a>CD-~--c:C."'-CWCDCD_C:
CD.ce>-CWOOOOOCW::l""DCDCD_~
"'002mN~~~~0(,)wca:a::oen
.
cw
o
t-
CIOCÞO-NM"U")CO"-COCÞO_NM..&n
--NNNNNNNNNNMC")MC")MM
o
("')
co
co
,....
co
"-
..
("')
....
co
OJ
N
N
U")
N
U")
0)
U")
U')
CD
"C
en
w
C
en
:x:
...
o
m
en
...J
c(
t-
O
t-
en
.J:
o
z
.
ce
o
...
~'I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-'
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. IR 91-63
Date: June 4, 1991
Subject: Joint P ~ Z / City Council Workshop
The Planning and Zoning Commission has scheduled a workshop to review and discuss the
Zoning Ordinance update. You have previously been provided with a copy of the Zoning
Ordinance which incorporates all addItions and deletions approved by the City Council
since 1984. There have been many questions regarding changes to the text which should or
should not have taken place. The purpose of the workshop is to identify those past changes
which should be retained.
The Planning and Zoning Commission will also discuss the results of the citizen survey
from the area adjacent to Bedford-Euless Road. .
The Planning and Zoning Commission has requested the City Council to participate in this
workshop scheduled for 6:30 P.M.r Tuesday~ June 11.. 1991 in the council chambers at city
hall. Please remember to bring your copy of the zoning ordinance which incorporates all
revisions since 1984.
~~~E~
Barry e
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - MAY 13, 1991 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting to order May 13, 1991, at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Tommy Brown
Byron Sibbet
Mack Garvin
Lyle E. Welch
Mark Wood
Jo Ann Johnson
Charles Scoma
Linda Spurlock
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
C.A Sanford
Jeanette Rewis
Rex McEntire
Greg Dickens
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
City Engineer
2.
INVOCATION
Councilman Garvin gave the invocation.
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING APRIL 22,1991
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, to approve the minutes of the
April 22, 1991 meeting. '
Motion carried 5-0; Councilwoman Johnson and Councilman Wood abstaining.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
Ie
I
May 13, 1991
Page 2
5.
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING MAY 6, 1991
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Scoma, to approve the minutes of the May 6,
1991 special meeting.
Motion carried 7-0.
6.
PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES
No action necessary.
7.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
Councilman Welch removed Item No. 10, Councilman Socma removed Item No.9 and Councilman
Garvin removed Item No. 28 from the Consent Agenda.
8.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(11, 12, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24,
25,26,27,29,30 &31)
APPROVED
Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, to approve the Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 7-0.
9.
GN 91-65 APPROVE "NO PARKING" ZONE ON WULIGER WAY
ORDINANCE NO. 1729
POSTPONED
Councilman Welch moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to postpone Ordinance No. 1729 for
forty-five days.
Mr. Luke Rainbolt, 6350 Browning Court, Director of H & M Foods, spoke for the postponement.
Staff was asked to notify the businesses on Wuliger Way of the action taken by the Council.
Motion carried 7 -0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
May 13, 1991
Page 3
*10.
GN 91-66 APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITIEE
APPROVED
Councilman Welch moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to appoint Mr. Paul Miller, to Place 1
and Dennis Stout as Alternate on the Planning and Zoning Commission and Capital Improvement
Advisory Committee.
Motion carried 7 -0.
*11.
GN 91-67 BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR GENERAL FUND ENCUMBRANCES
APPROVED
*12.
GN 91-68 AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 1679 - IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
ORDINANCE 1736
APPROVED
13.
GN 91-69 DETERMINING THE NECESSI1Y FOR
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ON CRANE ROAD
ORDINANCE NO. 1732
APPROVED
"AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING AND PROVIDING FOR
THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM ON A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING
STREET: CRANE ROAD FROM AMUNDSON ROAD SOUTH TO APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET NORTH
OF SOUTH CREST DRIVE IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS, FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION; MAKING
APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE INDEBTEDNESS THEREBY INCURRED;
MAKING PROVISIONS FOR THE LEVYING OF ASSESSMENTS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTIES
AND THE OWNERS THEREFORE FOR A PART OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS;
PROVIDING FOR METHODS OF PAYMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE
CERTIFICA TES IN EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO
FILE A NOTICE OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE AND ALL SUBSEQUENT
PROCEEDINGS RELATIVE TO SAID SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ARE AND SHALL BE
PURSUANT TO TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, TITLE 13, CHAPTER 402, SUBCHAPTER D;
DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING
THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOK OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE
COMPLETE ORDINANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE ORDINANCE RECORD OF THIS CITY; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE."
Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to approve Ordinance No. 1732.
Motion carried 7-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
May 13, 1991
Page 4
14.
GN 91-70 PUBLIC HEARING ON CRANE ROAD
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS
Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Greg Dickens, Public Works Director, presented the scope of the project.
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City, presented Mr. Dennis Gruelle, Appraiser.
Mr. Gruelle presented the Enhancement Study.
Enhancement Study attached to these minutes as permanent record.
The following spoke in opposition:
Mr. David Sorrels, 6821 Crane Road
Mr. Frank Hobbs, 6829 Crane Road
Mr. Frank Knight, representing the owner of 6513 Crane Road
Mr. C.E. Freeby, 1660 Crane Road
The following spoke in favor:
Mr. Ronald Rushing, 6913 Crane Road.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing.
IS.
GN 91-71 CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS
FOR SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ON CRANE ROAD
ORDINANCE NO. 1734
APPROVED
"ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR A PORTION OF THE COST OF
IMPROVING A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING STREET: CRANE ROAD FROM AMUNDSON ROAD
SOUTH TO APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET NORTH OF SOUTH CREST DRIVE IN THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; FIXING CHARGES AND lENS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND
THE OWNERS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AND THE
ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE THEREOF; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY
COUNCIL THE RIGHT TO ALLOW CREDITS REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF THE RESPECTIVE
ASSESSMENT TO THE EXTENT OF ANY CREDIT GRANTED; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY
TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THE ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AND BY FILING THE
ORDINANCE IN THE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF SAID CITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DA TE."
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Scoma, to approve Ordinance No. 1734
assessing at the rate of 50 percent instead of 90 percent.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{'
I
May 13, 1991
Page 5
Motion carried 7-0.
16.
GN 91-72 DETERMINING THE NECESSI1Y FOR
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN VALLEY PARK ESTATES
ORDINANCE NO. 1733
APPROVED
"AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING AND PROVIDING FOR
THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM ON A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING
STREET: VALLEY PARK ESTATES ADDITION ON VALLEYVIEW DRIVE, PARKWAY AVENUE,
AND THE SOUTHERN MOST PORTION OF CRANE ROAD IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ITS
EXECUTION; MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE INDEBTEDNESS
THEREBY INCURRED; MAKING PROVISION FOR THE LEVYING OF ASSESSMENTS AGAINST
ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE OWNERS THEREFORE FOR A PART OF THE COST OF SUCH
IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR METHODS OF PAYMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS; DIRECTING THE CITY
SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY
CLERK OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE AND ALL
SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS RELATIVE TO SAID SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ARE AND
SHALL BE PURSUANT TO TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, TITLE 13, CHAPTER 402,
SUßCHAPTER D; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS
ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOK OF THE CITY COUNCIL
AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDINANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE ORDINANCE RECORD OF
THIS CITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE."
Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No. 1733.
Motion carried 7-0.
17.
GN 91-73 PUBLIC HEARING ON VALLEY PARK ESTATES
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS
Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Greg Dickens, Public Works Director, presented the scope of the project.
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City, presented Mr. Dennis Gruelle, Appraiser.
Mr. Gruelle presented the Enhancement Study.
Enhancement Study attached to these minutes as permanent record.
The following appeared in opposition:
Mr. Marvin Hunt, 6520 Valley Park
Mr. Willis Jackson, 6512 Crane Road - in favor of sewer, against the way the
assessment was calculated
I'
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
May 13, 1991
Page 6
Mr. James Brady, 690 E. Lamar, Arlington, representing Red Bud Capital
Mr. Gardner Hinkley, 6508 Valley View - asked about tying on to Nob Hill sewer
Mr. Richard Cartwright, 6516 Crane Road, stated he was presently connected to the city sewer and
asked if he would be assessed.
Staff advised he would not be assessed.
Ms. Doris Foster, 6500 Crane, asked about the sewer stub out.
Staff explained where the stub out would be located.
The following spoke in favor:
Mr. Robert Curry, 6517 Valley View Drive.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing.
18.
GN 91-74 CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS
FOR SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN VALLEY PARK ESTATES
ORDINANCE NO. 1735
APPROVED
"ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR A PORTION OF THE COST OF
IMPROVING A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING STREET: VALLEY PARK ESTATES WHICH
INCLUDES SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONS UP VALLEYVIEW DRIVE, PARKWAY AVENUE,
AND THE SOUTHERN MOST PORTION OF CRANE ROAD IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS; FIXING CHARGES AND LIENS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE
OWNERS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AND THE
ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE THEREOF; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY
COUNCIL THE RIGHT TO ALLOW CREDITS REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF THE RESPECTIVE
ASSESSMENT TO THE EXTENT OF ANY CREDIT GRANTED; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY
TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THE ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AND BY FILING THE
ORDINANCE IN THE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF SAID CITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DA TE."
Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No. 1735
assessing at the rate of 50 per cent instead of 90 percent.
Motion carried 7-0.
RECESS
Mayor Brown called a recess.
BACK TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting back to order with the same members present as recorded.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
May 13, 1991
Page 7
*19.
GN 91-75 AUTHORIZING BANK SIGNATURES
RESOLUTION NO. 91-22
APPROVED
*20.
GN 91-76 PARK AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN
APPROVED
*21.
GN 91-77 PARK MAINTENANCE FACILITY (SOUTHERN SECTOR)
APPROVED
*22.
GN 91-78 PARTIAL REFUND OF STREET ESCROW FOR CRANE ROAD
APPROVED
*23.
PU 91-08 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM
JUANITA WILES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING
BURSEY ROAD (PARCEL #10)
APPROVED
*24.
PU 91-09 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM
WILLIAM AND HARRIETIE PALMER FOR THE PURPOSE OF
CONSTRUCTING BURSEY ROAD (PARCEL #7)
APPROVED
*25.
PU 91-10 AWARD OF BID ON LOCKBOX
APPROVED
*26.
PU 91-11 TELEPHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE
APPROVED
*27.
PU 91-12 ADDITIONAL DISK STORAGE - POLICE COMPUTER
APPROVED
28.
PU 91-13 EQUIPMENT PURCHASES; IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE
APPROVED
Councilman Welch moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, to approve PU 91-13 with one
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
May 13, 1991
Page 8
exception that the existing tractor not be traded in and that it be transferred to the Parks
Department.
Motion carried 6-1; Mayor Pro Tem Sibbet, Councilwoman Spurlock, Councilmen Garvin, Wood,
Welch, and Scoma voting for and Councilwoman Johnson voting against.
*29.
PU 91-14 PURCHASE OF UNINTERRUPTED POWER SOURCE
APPROVED
*30.
PU 91-15 PRINTING CONTRACT - UTILITY STATEMENTS
APPROVED
*31.
PU 91-16 PURCHASE CONTRACT - UTILITY WATER METERS
APPROVED
32.
PW 91-16 PUBLIC HEARING ON ADOPTION OF
"MUNICIPAL DRAINAGE UTILITY SYSTEM"
ORDINANCE NO. 1727
APPROVED
Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing.
Councilman Scoma made a presentation on the Drainage Utility System.
Councilmen Garvin and Scoma and Councilwoman Spurlock spoke in favor of the fees.
Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet spoke on fees as opposed to tax.
Councilman Wood had several questions pertaining to the fees.
Mr. Nelson Stoppiello, 7400 Jade Circle, spoke on drainage problems on Calloway Branch.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing.
Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No. 1727.
Motion carried 4-3; Councilwoman Spurlock, Councilmen Garvin, Scoma, and Welch voting for and
Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet, Councilwoman Johnson, and Councilman Wood voting against.
I- · ·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
May 13, 1991
Page 9
33.
PW 91-17 SETIING DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON LEVYING
A SCHEDULE OF CHARGES FOR THE DRAINAGE UTILITY SYSTEM
RESOLUTION NO. 91-21
APPROVED
Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Resolution No. 91-21.
Staff advised the date for the public hearing in the resolution stated June 10th, and the date should
have been June 24th.
Councilman Scoma amended his motion, Councilman Garvin amended his second, to approve June
24th as the date for the public hearing on levying a schedule of charges for the drainage utility
system.
Motion carried 7 -0.
34.
CITIZENS PRESENTATION
MR. BRITr NEWfON
8713 TERRELL DRIVE
RE: DRAINAGE PROBLEM - BEAR CREEK
Mr. Newton advised of the flooding problem he had. Mr. Newton stated he would like to take his
problem to the CIF Committee and asked when the next CIP Committee Meeting would be held.
Mr. Newton was advised the meeting would be held May 28th at 3:30 p.m.
Mr. John Dudzik discussed the requirement for a vendor's permit. Mr. Dudzik stated the way it was
handled now was not cost effective and asked Council to look into the ordinance. Mr. Dudzik was
advised staff would look into it.
35.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sibbet, to adjourn the meeting of
May 13, 1991.
Motion carried 7 -0.
A TIEST:
Tommy Brown - Mayor
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
I·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
MARCH 4, 1991
BOARD IN ATTENDANCE Don Tipps, Chairman
Ron Parks, Vice Chairman
Bob Fenimore
Sharon Battles
Bobbie Lambert
Karen Allen
BOARD NOT IN ATTENDANCE: J. Douglass Davis
Oscar Trevino
ALSO IN ATTENDANCE Jim Browne, Director-PARD
Jack Giacomarro, Parks Superintendent
Monica Sue Walsh, Recreation
Superintendent
CALLED TO ORDER Mr. Tipps, Chairman at 6:35 P.M..
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Ms. Battles made a motion to approve the
minutes as submitted. Mr. Fenimore
seconded the motion. Vote was unanimous
in favor of the motion by those in
attendance at the January 7, 1990 Board
meeting.
NEW BUSINESS
ITEM 3: YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATIONS REPORT
Mr. John Williamson, President, RYA, gave the following report:
Basketball play-offs began this week. Registration for baseball
brought in 220 boys.
Ms. Candy Roos, Secretary, NRGSL, gave the following report:
During registration 250 have signed-up including recruited teams.
Season begins April 8, 1991. Pitching clinics and tournaments
have also been scheduled.
ITEM 4: RICHLAND YOUTH ASSOCIATION SECURITY SYSTEM
Mr. Williamson, President of RYA, stated that three bids were
received to install a security system in the concession
stand/storage building and a permit has been obtained. Mr.
Fenimore made a motion due to the vandalism and theft that has
occurred at this facility to accept this proposal. Noting that
the city is provided the Ifaccess codes" and that the City is not
obligated to any expense or monitoring fees since the primary
purpose is to secure the property of the Association. Ms. Battles
seconded the motion. Discussion was held. Vote was unanimous in
favor of the motion.
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
,I
I
I
I
1
Ie
,I
ITEM 5: HOT RODS, BASEBALL AND APPLE PIE
Mr. Ken Ogden, Yesterday Productions,7429 Maple, North Richland
Hills, gave the presentation:
A request was made to co-sponsor a special event at Northfield
Park with the Parks and Recreation Department on October 19-20,
1991 to display classic cars dated 1948 and older. There will be
games and activities for children, softball tournament for car
club teams and a pie eating contest for car club presidents.
Children will receive ribbons and trophies for the different games
participated. Approximately 150-200 vehicles are expected and
awards will be given for numerous car categories such as best
interior, engine, commercial, etc.. Before a letter of agreement
may be signed several requirements must be met, i.e.:
1. Event Insurance (the city is requiring $300,000 liability
insurance) .
2. Security Deposit.
3. Approval of all aspects of the event by staff.
Discussion was held. Ms. Battles made a motion to endorse this
event with all requirements met set forth by the City and Staff.
Mr. Fenimore seconded the motion. Vote was unanimous in favor of
the motion.
Ms. Battles requested that a monthly update be made to keep the
Board informed.
ITEM 6: GLENVIEW SENIOR ADULT CENTER UPDATE
Mr. Browne stated that bids were opened February 27, 1991. Bids
are being tabulated and the best bid will be recommended to the
Tarrant County Commissioners Court and the city Council for their
approval.
ITEM 7: SOUTHERN SECTOR PARK MAINTENANCE
Mr. Browne stated that the Glenview Facility will have to be
vacated by the Public Grounds crew by April 1 so that renovation
may begin. Upon completion of the building renovation, the bay
area will be used for storage of city records and supplies.
The Parks Division has discussed two options to meet the future
Service Center needs for the parks, right-of-ways, median and
public grounds maintenance for the southern sector of the city.
One option involves the construction of a Maintenance Service
Center (similar to the Watauga Road Maintenance Center) on city
owned property near the new Fire station south of Rita Beth
street. The second option is to renovate the old Kentucky Fried
Chicken facility on Grapevine Highway (now owned by the City) near
Fossil Creek Park. The Management Services Department has
estimated $30,000 for the renovation cost of the Kentucky Fried
Chicken facility. Management Services suggests this option might
be more cost effective than constructing a comparably sized
building at the Rita Beth street site. Reserve and current year
Park & Library contribution funds are adequate to finance this
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
project. There is also adequate area on this property for future
greenhouse construction.
Further discussion was held. Ms. Allen made a motion to recommend
to council to renovate the Kentucky Fried Chicken building for a
Southern Sector Park Maintenance Facility. Vote was unanimous in
favor of the motion.
ITEM 8: PROPOSED POLICY DIRECTION STATEMENTS
Mr. Browne stated that the Mission statement, Purpose, Policy
Direction statements and Goals as developed by Staff will provide
the framework for the consistent development of policy for this
Department and will possibly be incorporated into Parks Master
Plan document. Motion was made to accept the Mission statement,
Purpose, Policy Direction Statements and Goals and to recommend to
Council. Mr. Fenimore seconded the motion.
ITEM 9: WEIGHT ROOM USER FEE
The Staff has conducted a survey concerning weight room facility
usage. The Staff recommended the following:
RESIDENT
PER YEAR
NON-RESIDENT
PER YEAR
* INDIVIDUAL ID CARD USER FEE
** INDIVIDUAL WEIGHT ROOM FEE
$ 3.00
$25.00
$30.00
$50.00
with consideration to the results of the survey the Staff also
recommends implementing these new fees as patron ID cards expire
in the 1991/92 fiscal buàget year. Discussion was held. Mr.
Fenimore made a motion to accept the fee structure as submitted.
Ms. Allen seconded the motion. Vote was unanimous in favor of the
motion.
ITEM 10: 1991/92 BUDGET, PROGRAMS AND GOALS & OBJECTIVES
Mr. Browne informed the Board that the Parks and Recreation
Department is currently involved in the preparation of the 1991/92
fiscal year Budget. This year the Department's goal and
objectives will be incorporated directly into the budget process.
No further discussion was held.
ITEM 11: Parks Master Plan Update
Mr. Browne informed the Board of the current status of the Parks
Master Plan including contact from North Hills Medical Center,
Birdville Independent School District, Fort Worth Christian School
regarding potential joint venture park projects. Discussion was
held. Mr. Fenimore made a motion that further workshops on the
Park Master Plan with council were not necessary. Ms. Battles
seconded the motion. Vote was unanimous in favor of the motion.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ITEM 12: APPOINTMENTS OF PARKS BOARD REPRESENTATIVES FOR
CITY/SCHOOL COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE
Mr. Browne stated that the Birdville Independent School District
Board of Trustees and the City of North Richland Hills have
expressed a mutual desire to evaluate cooperative/joint use of
planning and development opportunities. A joint planning
committee comprised of Birdville Independent School District and
possibly Fort Worth Christian School representatives, Parks and
Recreation Board representatives, city council members and city
Staff should be formed to study this issue. Mr. Tipps requested
Mr. Fenimore and Ms. Battles serve as representatives from the
Board with Mr. Parks serving as the alternate. The appointed
members concurred.
ITEM 13: PARKS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS DIVISIONS REPORT
Mr. Giacomarro reported that:
Northfield Park's softball fields were ready for the season to
begin and the new sand volleyball court is now ready for use.
Richfield Park's lights are now working.
Fossil Creek Park's lights are also working and the nature trail
is being cleared.
Narich Park had a Girls Scout troop paint the playground
equipn1ent.
All landscaping projects are being completed and the irrigation
system is being installed on the Watauga Road median.
ITEM 14: RECREATION, ATHLETICS AND SENIOR ADULT REPORT
Ms. Walsh gave the following report:
The revenue collected for Recreation classes for January was
$16,276 and February was $15,912. Athletic revenue for February
was $22,000 and Facility revenue for February was $1,000
(gymnasium rentals were high). Computerized registration began
February 12, 1991. Further software for facility reservations and
athletic scheduling will also be installed soon. The Colors of
Spring Arts and Crafts Fair will be held March 16, 1991 from 10-5
at the Recreation Center. The "Friday Night Out" Teen Dance
brought 360 teens. The Red Cross Babysitting certification has to
date certified 53 bab1'-sitters. "Easter in the Park" will be held
on March 23, 1991 at Northfield Park and is co-sponsored by First
Interstate Bank on Grapevine Highway. The celebration will
include a parade, egg hunt, hot air balloon, face painting, and
entertainment. The Récreation Center is distributing American
Flag pins and yellow ribbons free of charge to patrons.
Co-Rec Volleyball registration brought in 23 teams which is a
maximum number teams. The TAAF Regional Men's liD" Softball
Tournament will be held on July 20 and 21 at Northfield Park. The
TAAF Co-Rec Regional Volleyball Tournament will be held on March
23, 1991 at the Recreation Center. The Men's Basketball League
concluded their season and three teams have advanced to Regional
play. A softball umpires meeting was held. The 1991 spring
Softball Season will begin Monday, March 11, 1991 at Northfield
:?élrk T/!it:!: 2::·:~'~cc~···~j..;·.:,?te.J_~1' ~_C 'J ~:ea.rr:::·: :¿J_2~:Iil1Ç; ea.ch. \,ree}<.. The
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
SportsFest Committee has also be continually meeting preparing for
SportsFest in April. The 5th Annual American Airlines Basketball
Tournament was held in February at the Recreation Center. A
Cross-Country meet will be held on the weekends of March 7 and 14
at Richfield Park with area Junior High Schools.
Ms. Walsh read the attached Senior Adult Center report.
ITEM 15: DISCUSSION OF OTHER ITEMS
Mr. Browne stated that Council had not acted on the starnes Orange
Valley property. The Board requested that a letter of declination
be sent the property owners.
r1r. Browne stated that "Earth Day" will be celebrated on April 21
at Richfield Park.
Mr. Browne also advised the Board of Councilman and Mrs. Mack
Garvin's auto accident.
ADJOURNMENT
Ms. Battles made a motion adjourn.
Mr. Lambert seconded the motion. Vote was
unanimous in favor of the motion to adjourn
at 8:22 P.M..
ATTEST:
I
'~t~
d-;{ÙI'l ì ~ ~ So
Don Tipps
Chairman
cÎ
(./
(/ r:lJ A
Çl}~~¿))~ /~
Glha Gonzale2 c
Recording sJc~ tary
I
I
I
./
,."
,
I
I
'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
¡I
Ie
I
CITY OF NORTII RICHLAND HILLS
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
APRIL 1, 1991
BOARD IN ATTENDANCE Don Tipps, Chairman
Bob Fenimore
J. Douglass Davis
Sharon Battles
Bobbie Lambert
Karen Allen'
Dear Trevino
BOARD NOT IN ATTENDANCE: Ron Parks, Vice Chairman
ALSO IN ATTENDANCE Jim Browne, Director-PARD
Jack Giacomarro, Parks superintendent
Monica Sue'Walsh, Recreation Superintendent
Tim Hightshoe, Public Grounds Division
CALLED TO ORDER Mr. Tipps~! Chairman at 6:35 P.M..
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Mr. Fenimore made a motion to approve the
minutes as submitted. Mr. Lambert seconded
the motion. Vote was unanimous in favor of
the motion by those in attendance at the
March 4, 1990 Board meeting.
NEW BUSINESS
ITEM 3: YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATIONS REPORT
Mr. Roy Sotelo, Vice-President, RYA, gave the following report:
will begin the baseball season soon. Registration increased with 900
youth (14 more teams) . Games will be played each night of the week
and on Saturdays. The Parks Division will also be working on the
fields this week. Mr. Giacomarro asked for a head count if possible
for their activities at Richfield Park. Mr. Browne stated that the
Parks and Recreation Department will take a request for a new lighting
system to city Council. The Department is aware of the need for a new
system and will convey that to Council and try to get funding
appropriated. Any type of work would be coordinated with RYA's
schedule.
No one was present to repres~nt the North Richland Girls Softball
League.
ITEM 4: GLENVIEW SENIOR ADULT CENTER UPDATE AND CLARIFICATION OF
"NON-PROFIT USE" POLICY
Mr. Browne gave the following information:
A bid of $176,500 was approved bý Council and the Tarrant County
Commissioners (due to the Community Development Block Grant) with the
Pirouz & Associates for renovation of the Glenview Facility beginning
April 1, 1991 and completing sometime in the mid-summer of 1991.
A Senior Adult Center Director will be contracted with Tarrant County
I
'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
senior services, similar to the Bursey Senior Adult Center.
A clarification of the non-profit group policy is needed for the
Glenview Facility in the January 1991 meeting. During the renovation
period the non-profit groups who had used Glenview are now meeting at
the Recreation Center free of charge with the understanding that they
may meet there only during the renovation of the Glenview Facility.
How should the non-profit groups be handled once the Glenview Facility
is primarily a senior adult center? The design was facilitated so that
all areas could be secured excluding the large multipurpose area that
could be used by the non-profit groups with a $100 security deposit.
Further clarification is needed for the non-profit group policy.
Discussion was held. Mr. Davis made a motion to include staff
recommendations and the $100 security deposit for non-profit groups who
wish to use the multipurpose room of the Glenview Facility. (Present
roster non-profit groups will be exempt from the $100 security
deposit.) Additional non-profit groups will not be accepted to the
Glenview Facility roster until renovations are complete, therefore
amending the minutes of January, 1991. Ms. Battles seconded the
motion. Vote was unanimous in favor of the motion and the amendment to
the minutes of January, 1991.
ITEM 5: FORT WORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL PROPOSAL FOR JOINT RECREATIONAL
FACILITY DEVELOPMENT
Dr. william Tucker, President of Fort Worth Christian School presented
the school's desire for a joint development opportunity with the city
of North Richland Hills and Fort Worth Christian School. A number of
acres are left to be developed on FW Christian School property and the
School's Board of Trustees would like to offer the city an opportunity
for a joint project. Mr. Tucker discussed their current facilities
and their desires. Mr. Browne stated that he and Mr. Tucker have had
opportunities to look at the property. with the Master Plan process
being near completion and after council adoption, the Master Plan can
be reviewed. The top three priority recommendations of the Consultants
for private/public ventures is to work with FW Christian School, North
Hills Medical Center and the Birdville Independent School District.
After reviewing the Master Plan the Board would need to determine what
would best serve the needs of our citizens. Some projects could be
worked on concurrently. The Board held further discussion.
ITEM 6: HOUSE BILL #1573 - TEXAS LOCAL PARK FUND
Mr. Browne explained that the Texas Local Park Fund is a matching grant
fund. It is financed by $.Ol/pack cigarette tax, raising $5,000,000
per year. This bill will be,presented to the Legislature and will be
asking them to establish a ~trust fund" from which the interest will
perpetually supply the "matching grant fund" money and to allow the
financing of indoor recreation centers (tennis, recreation, swimming,
etc. ) .
Mr. Fenimore made a motion to endorse House Bill #1573 - Texas Local
Park Fund and to express support with the signing of this Resolution
and forward to Representative Oliveira. No discussion was held. Mr.
Trevino seconded the motion. Vote was unanimous in favor of the
motion.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ITEM 7: PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1991/92
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AND BUDGET REQUESTS
Mr. Browne explained the Department Goals by Division and the
measurable steps to accomplish them. certain G&O's are part of
Decision Packages requests to Council. Further discussion was held on
reclassification of Staff.
Mr. Fenimore made a motion to accept the presented recommendations.
Ms. Battles seconded. Vote was unanimous in favor of the
recommendation.
ITEM 8: PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN UPDATE
The Master Plan is currently at the printer and looks very good.
Schrickel, Rollins & Associates, Inc. and Staff will be nominating our
Master Plan for an award from Texas Recreation and Park Society,
American Planners Association, American Society of Landscape
Architeects, etc., as well as other various awards. The Consultants
have told us that compared to other master plans they have prepared for
a number of other cities, this is bý far the best quality study both in
content and appearance. Barring any problems with printing, we should
be receiving the document on April 17. They will be delivered to the
Board and Council by April 18. The Master Plan will then be presented
to the Council on Apri¡ 22, 1991.
ITEM 9: PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD ANNUAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
Mr. Browne explained to the Board that their Annual Report to city
council is scheduled for April 22, 1991. Staff will assist the Board
in preparing the presentation highlighting Department accomplishments,
needs and future plans through a video. Further discussion was held.
ITEM 10: SPECIAL EVENTS UPDATE
_ "Earth Day", April 22, 1991: Mr. Hightshoe has been working with
Sarah Lipsky, Volunteer Coordinator. Ms. Lipsky has received 50
trees and received funding from Laidlaw and other sponsors.
Laidlaw has also sponsored the funding to have musical
entertainment.
_ "Hot Rods, Baseball and Apple Pie", September, 1991: The city has
waived the insurance requirement. They are currently seeking
corporate sponsorship and they have begun promotion. They have been
advertising at various car.~shows. The contract has not been
signed, but we looking forward to that and further information will
be provided at the next Board meeting.
a
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ITEM 11: Parks and Public Grounds Divisions Report
Mr. Giacomarro gave the following report:
Northfield Park: Ground \vork has been completed on clearing the
channel. The wooded area has also been grubbed and picnic tables have
been installed. Fire hose has been used for chalking the foul lines in
the past. However, an edger has been modified to replace the fire hose
in placing the chalk.
Richfield Park: Electrical work was done. The ladies restroom
vandalized in an attempt to get into the concession stand.
Norich Park: The Girl Scouts painted the playground equipment.
Fossil Creek Park: The restrooms have been painted, as well as regular
maintenance.
Mr. Hightshoe stated that with the help of Mr. Browne 600 trees were
received free of charge through the State Forestry Office. There are
approximately 1200 trees in the Tree Farms.
ITEM 12: RECREATION/ATHLETICS AND SENIOR ADULT REPORTS
RECREATION:
The First Annual "Colors of Spring" Arts and Crafts Fair was held on
March 16, 1991 with 69 booths. Balloon archways were used to decorate
the building. The vendors requested that the city hold this event two-
three times per year. "Easter in the Park" was held on March 23 and
co-sponsored with First Interstate Bank ($750). The event had 800-
1000 participants, 10,000 candy eggs, face painting, clowns, magic
show, the Recreation Center Dance Class also entertained. Everyone was
given a kazoo and participated in the parade along with the Easter
Bunny. The Staff from the Bank indicated that they were interested in
doing this next year. New classes begin in two weeks.
ATHLETICS:
T.A.A.F. Co-Rec Regional Volleyball Tournament was held on March 23.
Nine cities competed in this tournament. NRH's two teams placed 2nd
and 3rd. One of these teams will be playing in the state Co-Rec
Volleyball Tournament to be held on April 13-14 to be held at the NRH
Recreation Center and Richland High School Gyms. spring Softball
League has 94 teams registered. The season increased by 25 teams.
Northfield Park looks great.J SportsFest has 195 employees
participating this year. This has increased by 10 from last year.
SENIOR ADULT CENTER:
The monthly report is attached. In addition, to this report the Second
Annual st. Patrick's Day Dance had 60 people attend. This is the first
year to have a charge to the dance of $1.00. Attendance did not drop
due to this charge. Approximately 16 door prizes were contributed from
local merchants.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
III
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ITEM 15: DISCUSSION OF OTHER ITEMS
Mr. David Allen, resident of North Richland Hi·lls, expressed his
support in the city working with the School District. Due to his ties
with tennis, he also expressed his interest in being on a "Tennis
Center Committee".
Mr. Browne stated that on April 8, 1991, Council Action sheets will be
submitted for the Lighting Facility and the Southern Sector Maintenance
Facility.
ADJOURNMENT
ATTEST:
~)~
Don Tipps ~
Chairman
Mr. Fenimore made a motion adjourn. Ms. Battles
seconded the motion. Vote was unanimous in
favor of the motion to adjourn at 7:55 P.M..
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
I_Ubject:
Community Development
Council Meeting Date: 5/28/91
pu~lic Hearing for Request of Northridge II AgendaNumber: PZ 91-07
J01nt Venture to Rezone Lot 1R and Lots 27
through 110, Block 4, Northridge Addition, from
R-6-T-PD Townhouse Planned Development to R-3 Single
Family Residential. This property is located at the
northeast corner of Harwood Drive and Bob Drive.
Ordinance 1737
Northridge II Joint Venture is the owner of Lot 1-R and Lots 27
through 110 of Block 4, Northridge Addition located on Harwood Drive
at its intersection with Bob Drive. The tract contains 6 . 5 acres.
The property is currently platted into 84 residential lots which are
zoned R-6-T-PD (Townhouse Planned Development). However, the
property has not been developed and remains as a vacant tract.
The owners are requesting a zoning district change to R-3 Residential
to provide for a proposed subdivision plat which contains 23 lots.
The staff has notified all effected property owners located within 200
feet of the proposed zoning district change.
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and approved this zoning
change request at their April 11, 1991 meeting.
e Recommendation:
It is recommended that the city Council hold the required public
hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and zoning
commission.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
e gf~g Budget a~
~ent Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~
/7
rel/l/~
City Manager
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
I ,
R-1-MF J J
I
I-I 1556 , I
, I
I..' I I
, .
~ I I
i I ,
: , ,
, .
I ,
, I
c-
140
FE8 21'- t540.IMI.1&42, 1649
1&18,B5~ 1558.U562
C-I 1563,1564,1570,157'
15T5,1576J5~ 1590 '
DEC 1'4... l5ð3,.I6OO,'602,1608 I,
1615,1619, '821, 1625 i I
--
..,. Ia'" ''''IIl. :!It #!)
I
Ie
I
I ---
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
APRIL 11, 1991 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order
Chairman Mark Wood at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Secretary
Members
Wood
James Brock
David Barfield
Don Bowen
Ron Lueck
Don Collins
Pat Marin
Paul Miller
Barry LeBaron
Steve Pence
Wanda Calvert
. Member
ire Community Dev.
Building Official
P & Z Coordinator
CONSIDERATION OF THE
OF MARCH 14, 1991
Mr. Lueck said that on Page 16, 5th
paragraph, the word "most" should be
changed to "must".
Ms. Marin made the motion to approve
the minutes with the change. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck and
the motion carried 7-0 with Chairman
Wood abstaining since he was not
present at the meeting.
Chairman Wood said, since he has a
conflict of interest in the first two
cases, he would turn the meeting over
to Vice Chairman Brock. He said,
also, that Alternate Member Miller
would vote in his place.
Vice Chairman Brock said that since
these two cases are for the same
property, they would be heard
together, but voted on separately.
1.
PZ 91-07
Public Hearing for request of
Northridge II Joint Venture to rezone
Lot lR and Lots 27 thru 110, Block 4,
Northridge Addition, from their
present classification of R-6-T-PD
Townhouse Planned Development to R-3
Single Family Residential. This
property is located at the northeast
corner of Harwood Road and Bob Drive.
I Page 2
Ie p & Z Minutes
April 11, 1991
I
2. PS 91-06
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I PZ 91-07
APPROVED
I
Ie
I
Public Hearing for Replat of Lot lR
and Lots 27R thru 48R, Block 4,
Northridge Addition. This property is
located at the northeast corner of
Harwood Road and Bob Drive.
Vice Chairman Brock opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of these two cases
to please come forward.
Ernest Hedgcoth, Consulting Engineer,
came forward to represent the
developers for this project. He said
they are request a zone change from
R-6-T Townhomes to R-3 Single Family
and feel this is a much better use of
the land. Mr. Hedgcoth said the
property is surrounded by residential
on the east and north and there is an
apartment complex on the west side of
Bob. He said there are 86 platted
lots now, but they wish to change it
to 23 lots. He said, from the stand
point of traffic, safety and
maintenance, this would be better for
the city and would serve as a buffer.
Mr. Hedgcoth said it would enhance the
neighborhood and add to the tax roll.
Vice Chairman Brock called for anyone
else wishing to speak in favor of
these two requests to please come
forward.
There being no one, the Vice Chairman
called for those wishing to speak in
opposition to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
Vice Chairman Brock closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Bowen moved, seconded by Mr.
Barfield, to approve PZ 91-07. This
motion carried 7-0.
Vice Chairman Brock said Mr. Barfield
said he had a question about the plat.
I
Page 3
Ie P & Z Minutes
April 11, 1991
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
,I
Mr. Barfield said there may incur a
drainage problem to the north of Texas
Street in trying to get an easement
through the residential area. He
asked could they possibly put inlets
where both of their easements are at
the north end of Texas Street and at
the west end of San Jacinto to put the
positive overflow to Bob Street.
Mr. Hedgcoth said they would look into
that, but the natural drainage would
be to go through to Colorado Court.
He said if they cannot do that, they
will look at this alternative. He
said there are two inlets on Bob, but
they are not large enough for the 100
year storm. Mr. Hedgcoth said they
had previously intended to go that
way, but the city prefers us go to
Colorado Court.
Vice Chairman Brock said they agreed
to all the engineer's comments, but
that one and number three regarding
the side yard set-backs on three lots.
Mr. Hedgcoth said the builders had
requested this; they say their house
plans would fit better. He said they
considered moving the lot lines over
in the cuI de sacs, but that would
have made the front of the lots
smaller so you would have to set the
front building line back further to
get the required lot width. Mr.
Hedgcoth said they can restrict the
three lots so they will not face Texas
Street and they would have rear entry
garages.
Mr. Barfield said P & Z is currently
studying an ordinance to require
masonry fences along collector streets
and he asked if they would consider
this.
I
Page 4
Ie p & Z Minutes
April 11, 1991
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
Mr. Hedgcoth said they are planning on
putting some kind of a masonry entry
fence. He said right now, there is a
masonry fence on the east side of this
property for that subdivision and they
will probably extend that one. Mr.
Hedgcoth said they had not planned on
anything but an entry fence, but they
would consider one along Harwood Road.
Mr. Bowen asked the people in the
audience if they had any questions
they wished to ask.
Patrick Smith, 5340 Colorado Court,
came forward. He wanted to know what
type of houses are going to be built
there and the square footage.
Mr. Hedgcoth said the square footage
will meet the R-3 requirement which is
1600 square feet, but they plan to
build 1600 to 1800 square foot homes.
Vice Chairman Brock said, looking at
the lots, R-3 has 7500 square foot
lots and the present zoning has very
small lots.
Mr. Hedgcoth said these lots are well
over the R-3 requirement.
Mr. Wood said the minimum lot size for
R-3, which is the zoning on Colorado,
Colorado Court, and Lynda, is 7500
square feet, but these average 10,200
square feet. He said several are
13,000, 14,000, and 15,000 square feet
on the cuI de sacs and they will be
very comfortable with what is there.
Mr. Lueck said it would be much better
than the current R-6 zoning.
Mr. Bowen said the R-6 has 3500 to
4,000 square foot lots.
Ruth Heidel came forward. She wanted
to know more about the drainage.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 5
p & Z Minutes
April 11, 1991
PS 91-06
APPROVED
3.
Mr. Hedgcoth said they will collect
the water in a pipe underground and
take it to Lynda to an existing storm
sewer.
Ms. Heidel asked about the drainage on
Bob.
Mr. Hedgcoth said that would be an
alternative plan for the overflow for
the 100 year flood.
Vice Chairman Brock said that either
way they go should releave most of the
problem.
Mr. Barfield asked Mr. LeBaron if they
could address the issue of a masonry
fence for this project.
Mr. LeBaron said we do not have an
ordinance on that at this time.
Mr. Wood said there will be no problem
in putting in a masonry fence on
Harwood all the way to Bob.
Mr. Barfield made the motion to
approve PS 91-06 with the stipulation
that lots 41, 42, and 48 have rear
entry garages, side building lines
changed from 20 feet to 15 feet on
lots 41, 42, and 48, and that a
masonry sight barring and sound
dampening fence be required along
Harwood Road and designed by a
structural engineer. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Lueck and the motion
carried 7-0.
Chairman Wood returned to
ot s on
discussion.
Discussion regarding masonry screening
wall requirements for new
subdivisions.
1
I.
I
I
I
I
;1
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
'I
ORDINANCE NO. 1737
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-91-07 the following described property shall
be rezoned from R-6-T to R-3.
BEING a tract of land in the W.W. Wallace Survey, Abstract 1606, and being
Lot 1-R and Lots 27 through 110, Block 4, Northridge Addition, an addition
to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to a
plat recorded in Volume 388-194, Page 29, Plat Records, Tarrant County,
Texas;
BEGINNING at an iron pin in the north line of Harwood Road, said point
being the southwest corner of Lot 26, Block 4, Northridge Addition, an
addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas,
according to a plat recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 24, Plat Records,
Tarrant County, Texas, said pin being the southeast corner of the herein
described tract;
THENCE South 89 degrees 52 minutes 39 seconds West 209.94 feet along the
north line of said Harwood Road to an iron pin in same for corner;
THENCE North 88 degrees 45 minutes no seconds West 222.80 feet continuing
along the north line of said Harwood Road to an iron pin at the
intersection of said north line and the east line of Bob Drive;
THENCE North 651.10 feet along the east line of said Bob Drive to an iron
pin for the northwest corner of the herein described tract, said pin being
the southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 4, of said Northridge Addition
recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 24;
THENCE South 89 degrees 59 minutes 43 seconds East 437.06 feet to an iron
pin for the northeast corner of the herein described tract, said pin being
the southeast corner of Lot 10, Block 4, of said Northridge Addition
recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 24;
THENCE South no degrees 22 minutes 56 seconds West 655.49 feet to the Point
of Beginning and containing 6.53495 acres of land (284,662.4 square feet).
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I"
I
Page 2
This property is located at the northeast corner of Harwood Road and Bob
Drive.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF APRIL,
1991.
~~
SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-91-07 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Community Development
Public Hearing to consider
Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise
minimum parking dimensions for
various parking angles.
Council Meeting Date: 6/03/91
Agenda Number: PZ 91-08
Subject:
Ordinance 1738
The review of the Zoning Ordinance by Mr. Dan Boutwell of the firm
Planning Resources Group has identified a potential problem with the
table which describes minimum parking spaces for the various parking
angles. The existing table contains numerous errors and no one on the
staff has been able to determine where the original information came
from. The attached ordinance contains two tables, one for regular
size automobiles and the other for compact cars. Approval of the
ordinance will correct the error in the Zoning Ordinance and make
enforcement and interpretation much easier.
The Planning and Zoning commission considered this amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance at their April 11th meeting and has submitted it to
the City Council with a favorable review.
_ Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required public
hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning
commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
-
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
I
I
w
.R-f)/[ r/- ~
City Manager
, Finance Director
ment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
'-
I
I
1
ORDINANCE NO. 1738
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING
ORDINANCE 1080, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO
ESTABLISH REGULATIONS REGARDING PARKING AREA REQUIREMENTS;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning coDDllission of the ci ty of North
Richland Hills has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for
amendment of Ordinance No. 1080, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,
by changing the said ordinance as set forth herein.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS:
1.
THAT, the language contained in Table 22.2 be deleted and that Table
22.2a, Table 22.2b and Figure 1 as shown on the attached exhibit "A",
attached hereto and made a part thereof, be hereby adopted and that
Ordinance Number 1080 shall hereafter reflect these modifications.
2.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention
of the city Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses
and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase,
clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be
declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidi ty or
unconsti tutionali ty shall not affect any of the remaining phrases,
clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this ordinance, since
the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the
incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or
unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
3.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance 1080, The Zoning Ordinance of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas, as amended, shall remain in full force
and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
'-
I
I
2
4.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage and publication as provided by the North
Richland Hills Charter and the laws of the state of Texas.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS
1991.
DAY OF
S
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS
1991
DAY OF
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY
I·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
TABLE 22. 2a Exh¡b,·~ 'A {(
PARKING DIMENSIONS
FULL SIZE CARS
AISLE
KII. AISLE WIDTH LElGTH MODULE WIDTH
PARKIBG STALL STALL ------~~------- PEl ---~-------
AHGLE WIDTH DEPl'H ORE-WAY N>-WAY STALL ORE-WAY TWO-WAY
--~---- -----
(A) (B) (C) (D) (D) (E) (F) (F)
-.....----... -----
PARALLEL 8.0 8.0 12.0 18.0 22.0 28.0 34.0
20 9.0 14.6 12.0 18.0 26.3 41.2 47.2
30 9.0 16.8 12.0 18.0 18.0 45.6 51.6
45 9.0 19.1 12.0 25.0 12.7 50.2 63.2
50 9.0 19.6 18.0 25.0 11.7 57.2 64.2
60 9.0 20.1 18.0 25.0 10.4 58.2 65.2
75 9.0 19.7 25.0 25.0 9.3 64.4 64.4
90 9.0 18.0 25.0 25.0 9.0 61.0 61.0
TABLE 22.2b
PARKING DIMENSIONS
COMPACT CARS
AISLE
IIIB. AISLE WIDTH LElfGTH MODULE WIDTH
PARKING STALL STALL ---------------- PER ----------------
AlGLE WIDTH DEPl'H ORE-WAY N>-WAY STALL ORE-WAY N>-WAY
----- ---
(1) (B) (C) (D) (D) (E) (F) (F)
----~- ~---
PARALLEL 8.0 8.0 12.0 18.0 18.0 28.0 34.0
20 8.0 12.3 12.0 18.0 23.4 36.6 42.6
30 8.0 13.9 12.0 18.0 16.0 39.8 45.8
45 8.0 15.6 12.0 25.0 11.3 43.2 56.2
50 8.0 15.8 18.0 25.0 10.4 49.6 56.6
60 8.0 16.1 18.0 25.0 9.2 50.2 57.2
75 8.0 15.6 25.0 25.0 8.3 56.2 56.2
90 8.0 14.0 25.0 25.0 8.0 53.0 53.0
w
F D
Note: All dimensions are expressed in feet.
FIGURE 1
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Communi ty Development
Council Meeting Date: 5/28/91
Subject:
Public Hearing to consider the recommendationAgendaNumber?Z 91-10
from the Planning and Zoning Comm1SS1on to change
the zoning from R-5-D (Duplex) to R-1 (Single
Family Residential) on Lots 9 through 18 and
Lots 23 through 32, Block 6; Lots 3 through 11
and Lots 13 through 16, Block 7; and Lots 1 through 5,
Block 8, Diamond Loch Add.
Ordinance 1739
During a review of the Official zoning Map, it was discovered that
several homes in the Diamond Loch area are currently zoned for
Duplexes, whereas, an actual survey made by the Building Inspection
Department revealed only one duplex to actually exist. The balance of
the area has been built with traditional single family homes. The
Planning and Zoning commission has initiated a zoning district change
from the duplex zoning district to a single family residential
district to prevent potential problem from occurring in the future.
The zoning Ordinance allows for a zoning district change to be
initiated by either (1) the property owner, (2) the City Council, or
(3) the Planning and Zoning commission.
~ At the May 9th public hearing of the Planning and Zoning commission
Ms. Clarice Conrad, 6432 Diamond Loch Court (Lot 9, Block 7) stated
that she wanted to retain the duplex zoning on her property to allow
her to construct a "granny house" on the rear of the property at some
time in the future. She was advised by the Planning and Zoning
commission that a "granny house" is not a duplex and that her existing
single family home would be included in the area being rezoned to R-1
Single Family Residential. Attached is a letter from Ms. Conrad which
requests the city council to allow her duplex zoning to remain.
Ms. Conrad also stated at the May 9th P & Z meeting that there were
other duplexes in the area. The Planning and Zoning commission
instructed the staff to notify each property owner by certified mail
requesting each owner to indicate whether their home was a single
family unit or a duplex structure. All surveys returned have shown
the units to be single family structures except for Lot 12, Block 7
which does have a duplex on the lot. Approval of the proposed
ordinance will change the zoning from R-5-D to R-1 for all lots except
Lot 12 on Block 7.
ReCODDDendation:
It is recommended that the ci ty Council hold the required public
hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning
commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Bud t
er
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
w--
ÞV~
City Manager
, Finance Director
epartment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I',
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
May 17, 1991
CITY COUNCIL
City or North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 820609
North Richland Hills~ TX 76182
Re: Re-zoning of lot 9 block 7
2nd addition Diamond Loch
Dear Council Members,
We ask you to please leave the zoning on our lot as two
ramily.
We bought the lot i.n 1973 because it was zoned 2-family and
so stated on our deed restrictions.
The house we built in 1978 is a 2-story which can be easily
converted to 2-family. We had an extra unfinished room rramed in
the attic area when we built which can be finished as a kitchen-
dining area. The upstairs would then have kitchen-dining~ two
bedrooms, two baths and living room. The downstairs area would
have living room, dining room, kitchen, bedroom and bath.
We have had plans to either convert the house to a
2-family~ or since we have a large lot to possibly build a
granny house in the back; maybe connecting with an atrium to our
existing house.
We planned to let one of our sons and his family live in
the big house and we would live in the small one.
We reel that to lose our 2-ramily zoning will downgrade our
property and cause it to be or less value.
We ask that you please consider our request. It will be or
great value to us to keep our 2-ramilyr':zoning and we do not
believe it will be detrimental to thë'('-city or our neighbors in
any way.
Sincerely,
)~C'~
¿)~~
Clarice Conrad
Warren Conrad
6432 Diamond Loch Ct.
North Richland Hills~ TX 76180
~
Ie
I:~
I
I
'I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
~I
-I' ~ i-
- ,-,;.
I~
-
---
_I
R-I
438
--
---1
~
~-
:::1C:~
-
-~
I~-
R-6-T
u- PD"-
1144
267
.1
R-2
u
R-2
~4Q9s.ME:, ~ASE
,Li,';1'\1t \ I ,I àf
,'; ~'~> ">"Þ'>'~'
"""""!\'~~'
~,
c
C t"'\
'0
~
\
-L 1 1 I I ¡ ì 1 -, \ \ \~~
rTfTlm- TT ~\K
p
-
-
;'-A ø.
-
~
------ -
~ l ).
I
S.U
..0
~'I.
-
-
,
~--
.- -
'F-::',/~I
~,:d
js
~
~' ,.-J- IR"5 0
. E OE ... \)
R-
FP
""'--- 4, C
~
~
I R-a
~
\
H~5i
I
-
1------
-
l--Li I
'\
~ ",\
1-2
2,-lëUI ,.,-~
~I IQaa-
--I
~
~~~ 11-----
R
u
.
-
I
_ l
=aD - ilT
_ ~ =><¡ T
~::~C=~'MO ¡I;~~t~ I~~~
~,",-M' I I 1 IT 8BfE] L "''''T
§ f.~~ I I ~,~~~~ 8T ~-'-
~ 'I 'I ...... ~I-- L--
~ I Jtt ~ ~~ ~~:::-
JD T -n~v
_~lllfT;i~~.
~:Jl'- ITf!!~~
1~' TIf,.nW1B
mm I [II IR~ --=L~
u I JlL1rftp=j = ~
~ í L]'- ---r-'
fiR -= ~ ---<
...... -- ,
MULLEMOOOE :: ::::::::
¡.... -
."~ - -
g}I1,=C [lL -
~ __ _iC-2, r----1 U ~
a:~- / /Cl4,Q T 1570
-1 F1Rt:= _ ~ 'C
r f ------- - -
_ R- ... 1145 ,.~ I\", ~
r- --- R-
J I ~M!; - C-2f
_ _ ~== C-2 1312
~ A __ ...l.-¡ I I C -21J ~ rl j.~~ II
.... ~u t t r 1 I'~~ 'R'="'
i ILP 1 ie· ~
~, c ~
I -- ~
illllllllllll! /1 r~ -:J~-j~
_~ __ 1-2
J. -
¡ lli ... ---
'~).~
iv/
¡ T Tí
I
R -7-MF
-
C-I
I
C -I
I
I
4-SD
'~ í
lr
7'"
111 7, e-I
"t"\
~
t i T¡
, '~-I
C-2
C-I
, '.., .
I' Page 4
Ie P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
I
2. PS 91-07
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I 3. PZ 91-10
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Request of Tecnol, Inc. for Replat
Lots 5R & 6R, Block 1, NRH Indust
Park Addition. This property i
located on Industrial Park Bevard,
east of Rufe Snow Drive.
Max Reev with Tecnol, came forward.
they have a 12 plus acre tract
kno as lot 5R and have recently
chased a 5 plus acre tract from RTC
and requests it be removed from lot 6R
and added to lot SR. Mr. Reeves said
they plan to expand the present
facility and also have future plans to
some day build another facility on the
new property.
Tecnol was
they have
property and are
lot.
Mr. LeBaron stated th
needing to expand
purchased additi
platting it i
Mr. Reeves stated he has no problems
with the Engineer's comments.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 91-07 subject to the Engineer's
comments and the stipulation that a
signature line be added on the plat
for RTC to sign. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Miller and the motion
carried 7-0.
Public Hearing for request of the City
of North Richland Hills to rezone 38
lots in Diamond Loch Addition from
their present classification of R-S-D
Duplex to R-1 Single Family
Residential.
Mr. LeBaron stated that a large part
of Diamond Loch Addition is currently
zoned duplex and has been for
approximately 20 years, but could only
find one duplex built there; the
others were build single family. He
said there are 2 problems; the duplex
zoning classification "R-5-D" no
longer exists; we only have R-4-SD
duplex which has different
requirements.
I' Page 5
P ¢ Z Minutes
Ie May 9, 1991
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Mr. LeBaron said we need to change the
zoning to R-1 like the rest of Diamond
Loch. He said if you rezone to R-l,
what do you do with the duplexes; do
you change them to R-4.
Chairman Brock asked the audience how
many were present who have duplexes in
the are. There were two.
Chairman Brock opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of changing the
zoning to R-l to please come forward.
There being no one, the Chairman
called for those wishing to speak in
opposition to changing the zoning to
please come forward.
Bill Frey, CPA from Fort Worth, came
forward to represent Mr. & Mrs. Eddie
Hamer who live in Belgium. He said
they bought the property at 4400
Diamond Loch approximately 15 years
ago when their daughter was an
exchange student here. Mr. Frey said
it is a duplex and he keeps it in
tip-top shape. He said they purchased
it as an investment and he requests to
be grandfathered so it could continue
as a duplex.
Clarice Conrad, 6432 Diamond Loch
Court, came forward. She said she has
had the property ever since the
addition started. She said her deed
restrictions states that only 8 lots,
lots 9 through 16, Block 7, would be
zoned 2 family.
Mr. Bowen said that is not what the
zoning map shows.
Ms. Marin said it probably meant that
many lots in that Block would be
duplex.
I' Page 6
P & Z Minutes
Ie May 9, 1991
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Ms. Conrad said her's was lot 9, Block
7. She said they built on it and
planned later to build a granny house
in the back since it was a large lot.
Chairman Brock stated that putting a
house behind a house would not be a
duplex; it would not be a common wall.
Mr. LeBaron said that was correct.
Ms. Conrad said it says on her deed
restrictions "Two Family" zoning; it
does not say it has to be a duplex.
Mr. Bowen asked if Ms. Conrad's was a
duplex.
Ms. Conrad said it was a single family
house, but she does not want the
zoning changed. She says there are
three two-family dwellings on that
street. She said lots 11 & 12 are
duplexes and lot 13 has a garage
apartment in the back.
Ms. Conrad said she has her deed
restrictions and if anything has been
changed, she has not been notified.
Ms. Conrad said she wants to be able
to build a house in the back for her
parents or convert her house into two
family.
Mr. Bowen said he did not think the
granny house would be legal.
Mr. LeBaron said that is correct.
Mr. Bowen said he was not sure about
the garage apartment.
Mr. LeBaron said that could possibly
be considered for duplex zoning.
Chairman Brock called for anyone else
wishing to speak in opposition to the
change to please come forward.
I Page 7
P & Z Minutes
Ie May 9, 1991
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Barfield said he would like to
know which are duplexes and which are
single family.
Ms. Conrad said lots 11 & 12 are
duplexes and lot 13 has the garage
apartment.
Mr. Barfield said he feels this should
be surveyed on the ground and he
requests it be tabled to allow the
staff time to go out and check this.
Mr. LeBaron said he had three staff
people go out and drive down the
streets surveying, he has had 6 or 7
surveys made, and they could only
visualize one and the garage
apartment. Mr. LeBaron said he feels
the people did not know the property
was zoned for duplexes.
Ms. Marin said she feels that if they
bought it knowing it was duplex
zoning, they have every right to keep
that zoning, but if they have a single
family house built in duplex zoning,
it would be non-conforming and that is
what we need to change.
Mr. Bowen asked if you have a single
family house built on a duplex lot and
it burns down, could they build a
single family house back.
Mr. LeBaron said they could build
either single family or duplex.
Mr. Lueck said he feels they should
protect the ones that built the
duplexes.
Mr. Barfield asked if you could
stipulate that in the zoning.
I
Ie
I
Page 8
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
Mr. LeBaron said that would not be the
proper thing to do.
II
I
Mr. Barfield said to protect these
three people, the Commission would
have to leave those lots out.
I
Mr. Lueck said he felt they should
protect the property owners in case it
burned down, they could build back
either single family or duplex. He
said he feels buying that property
made them have flexibility.
II
I
Mr. LeBaron said he feels it should be
zoned appropriately. He said there
could be problems with neighbors, if a
single family house burned down and
they built a duplex back on the lot.
He said they usually are not aware of
the zoning.
I
~
Mr. Lueck said they are aware of it
now, because we sent each of them a
letter.
I
I
Mr. Barfield asked if they could zone
it, leaving the duplexes out, and give
them a time span for them to come in
if they had a duplex. He said to send
them a registered letter stating if
they have a duplex, to please let us
know before June 10th City Council
meeting.
I
I
Mr. LeBaron said we could send them
all a registered letter stating they
can come to the City Council meeting
June 10th.
I
PZ 91-10
APPROVED
Mr. Barfield recommended approval of
PZ 91-10, that it be changed to R-1
zoning and that any existing duplexes
that notify the city that they have a
duplex prior to the June 10th City
Council meeting will remain duplex.
I
I
Ie
Mr. Bowen asked if that would include
the lady's property that did not want
her's changed.
I
I"
Ie
I
¡
'I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 9
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
4.
PZ 91-11
Mr. Barfield said it would not.
Mr. Bowen seconded the motion and the
vote was 4-3 with Marin, Lueck, and
Brock voting against. The motion
carried.
Public Hearing for request of the Bank
of North Texas to rezone Tract 7,
John's Addition, from its present
classification of C-2 Commercial to
1-2 Industrial. This property is
located on the east side of Davi
Boulevard and south of the oad.
Mr. LeBaron stated this tr, t of land
at one time had a cabine shop in it,
but a cabinet shop is, t an allowed
use in C-2 zoning a 'the building
does not conform t the masonry
requirement for 2 zoning. He said
the structure· currently vacant and
before it ca . be used again, it either
needs to b rezoned to 1-2 or the
buildin e brought up to code and be
used f something other than a
cab t shop.
airman Brock opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman called for those wishing
to speak in opposition to this request
to please come forward.
Councilman Scoma came forward. He
stated that he was speaking on behalf
of several neighbors who has property
adjacent to or in the vicinity of the
property being requested for rezoning.
He said he understands the bank needs
to utilize this facility for revenue
purposes and not just let it set
there. Councilman Scoma said he
understands it is non-conforming. He
said they are totally in agreement in
making it where a cabinet shop can be
I
.....
10
BAI
3
3
3
4
5
6
21
20
19
N
16
4
TASO
3f
7R.
1
, ~:.1
# 7 G l¡,(J..
<?;
I
~oC~
~O ~
TR 28
13.36 Ac
TRACT B
TRACT
TA 282
TRACT A I
~ ..........
1.724 I
--.......... -
2
2
3
3
A2A2
10
4
TA 2A1
'I-
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1739
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-91-10 the following described property shall
be rezoned from R-5-D to R-l.
BEING Lots 9 through 18 and Lots 23 through 32, Block 6, Lots 3 through 11
and Lots 13 through 16, Block 7, and Lots 1 through 5, Block 8, Diamond
Loch Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant
County, Texas.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF MAY, 1991.
Æ /7 /';) CHA--I.~N
" -r" /-<'.f\. l \
L0 -1/1 (-,0'(, ,!---':A· ~,l J k,£~···~/\ i
t:)" ¡, l ,-~.... /..___.,.,.<-, .;10" ,',....~
SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
ZONING COMMISSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-91-10 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
I
:1'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Communi ty Development
Council Meeting Date: 6/04/91
Subject:
Consideration for a request for an Appeal AgendaNumber?Z 91-11
Hearing on Zoning Request that was denied by
the Planning and Zoning commission on May 9, 1991
The Bank of North Texas submitted a request for a zoning district
change on a 3 acre tract located on Davis Boulevard. The property
contains a large building that had been used as a cabinet shop.
However, the property is currently zoned C-2 and a cabinet shop is not
a permitted use in the C-2 zoning district. The Bank of North Texas
had requested a change to the 1-2 Industrial Zone which does allow for
the building to be used as a cabinet shop. At the May 9th, P & Z
meeting, the request was denied by a 4-3 vote. Attached are copies of
the minutes of the May 9th P & Z meeting and a copy of the request for
an appeal from the Bank of North Texas.
According to section 28. 6 of the Zoning Ordinance, any denial of a
zoning change request may be appealed to the City Council within ten
days after denial. The Applicant has submi tted a request for an
appeal to the City Council within the prescribed ten day period.
Should the Council decide to consider the appeal, the earliest date
for an appeal hearing will be July 8th to allow time for the required
~ public notification.
ReCODDDendation:
I
I
I
I
I
It is recommended that the City Council set the date to conduct the
public hearing for July 8, 1991.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Ot
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
I!-/)t/~
artment Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
~
I
Pa e 1 of
I~
I.
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
ItIJÇ
May 17, 1991
Mr. Barry LeBaron, Director of Develo¡;xnent
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182
Re: Tract 7 of the John's Addition, Second Filing an Addition to the City of
North Richland Hills I Tarrant County, Texas, according to the Plat recorded
in Volume 388-79, Page 32, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas: more
commonly known as 6428 Davis Boulevard, City of North Richland Hills,
Tarrant County, Texas.
Dear Mr. LeBaron:
The Bank of North Texas would desire to appeal the decision of the Planing and..
aÞ Zoning Conmission to recamnend the denial of our request to have the above
referenced property rezoned fran "C-Z" Cœmercial to "I-Z" Medimn Industrial.
As you are aware the Bank of North Texas was not represented at.the P & Z
hearing of May 9, 1991 which the above request for zoning was on the agenda.
It was the Banks understanding that this motion could and would be removed
from the agenda, and that this matter could be resumed at sane future date per
the Banks May 9, 1991 conversation with a member of the Planing and Zoning
Cœmission. Bank of North Texas therefore must request an appeal of the P & Z
commission's decision and present its case before the City Council. Please
advise me of any additional requirements to appeal this request, and further
advise me of the time and date in which the City-Council will address this
matter. Thank you for your assistance in this matter and should you need to
contact me for any reason feel free to call me at (817) 280-9557 .
Sincerely,
~~~¿
Thomas G. Sanders, Jr.
Assistant Vice President
TGS/dd
Hand Delivered
Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested
Regular Mail
B
A
N
K 0 F
P.O. Box 987
NOR T
Hurst, Texas 76053
H T E
817-280-9500
x
A
s
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Communi ty Development
Council Meeting Date: 6/03/91
Subject:
Public Hearing for request of Oscar Trevino, ~gendaNumber: PZ 91-12
to rezone Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Meacham Addition
from R-2 Single Family Residential to C-2 Commercial.
This property is located on the west side of Smithfield
Rd. between Guy st. and Arthur Dr.
Ordinance 1740
Mr. Oscar Trevino has submitted a request to rezone Lots 1 and 2,
Block 2, Meacham Addition from R-2 (Single Family Residential) to C-2
(Commercial). The two lots are located in the 6400 block of
smithfield Rd. between Guy st. and Arthur Dr. The tract only includes
.92 acres and does not meet the minimum one acre requirement contained
in section 14.3(a) of the Zoning Ordinance. However, Mr. Trevino
states that the property will not develop in its current zoning
classification and wishes to use the property for an office and yard
for a construction company. A Contractor Office, Shop and Garage (No
fabrication) is a permitted use in the C-2 Zoning District under
section 14.2.16.
The Planning and Zoning commission conducted a public hearing on this
~ proposed zone change on May 9th and several citizens near the property
being considered had several questions of the owner. Attached is a
copy of the minutes of the May 9th P & Z meeting. The request for a
zone change was recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning
commission by a 5-2 vote.
Since the May 9th P & Z meeting, a citizen petition has been received
by the City Secretary voicing opposition to the zoning district
change. According to section 211.006 (d) of the Texas Local
Government Code, at least a three-fourths affirmative vote of the City
Council is required when a proposed zoning district change is
protested in writing by the owners of 20 per cent of the area
immediately adjoining and within 200 feet of the proposed change. A
copy of the petition is attached to this memo. According to
calculations made by the staff, the petition satisfies the 20 per cent
minimum criteria.
Reco..endation:
It is recommended that the City Council hold the required public
hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning
commission.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
Operating Budget tß
Other::=º- q ,
-U~ ~ re ~
Departmerrl Head Signature I Ity Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Pa e 1 of
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I Ie: /J Id'd.f $ L
I ~ f:to//(~
I ¿-A 11(¿7#~
Ie - /2
/)t-µ+711AA y~~
1r4 ~
I t#~ t~
14 ð~
I :;~
I ~
II
I
I
I
PETITION
~
5¡c:t'1/9/
(:ðO ~
MAY-22-91
RE:PZ 91-12
THIS PETITION THE UNDERSIGN IS IN OPPOSITION TO THE
REZONING OF LOTS 1&2 BLOCK 2, MEACHAM ADDITION,
FROM THEIR PRESENT CLASSIFICATION OF R-2 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL TO A PROPOSED CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 COMMERCIAL.
'_e: J ~a;z
~~S~~
1';)ð ~r
7a;>.ö ~R _
, 7 ßÃ9 A ~TJI.V A.
-17~ 2 <g &A'n¿¡~
7 ~ ;¿ r J9 /117/1712.
7 f '6 ~
/ðdri
18';), ( ~
b l' JI ~f£f IfJ ~
& J 5 7 ~ I/}¡FJ ¡;; L{) RßJ ~
C J.:J 3 G' M Irlt ¡: / G l. 0 f( 12.
tt,¥/3 ~ 6/f/ð -t- #II'" ~ ~ ,pjU~ 1I ~
W6 ,J+£ K~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ANALYSIS OF PETITION OPPOSING THE REZONING
OF LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 2, MEACHAM ADDITION
lAKE OF ADDRESS OF LOT LO'l lAKE OF AREA PER CEItT OF
PE'lITIOm PE!ITIOIER IfOIIBD IfOIIBEI SOBDIVISIOI II SF (est) IJlPACl' AREA
---~~------------ ------------------ ---- ---- ------------ ---- --------
Virginia Goodman 6413 Smithfield Rd. 1 3 Meachal Add. 20,000 7.0
Virginia Johnson 6413 Smithfield Rd. 2 3 Meacham Add. 8,000 2.8
Jessie Johnson 6413 Smithfield Rd. 4 3 Meachal Add. 15,000 e 5.3
Jessie Johnson 6413 Smithfield Rd. 5 3 Meacham Add. 10,000 e 3.5
K.D. Bell 7829 Arthur 3 2 Meachal Add. 20,000 7.0
K.D. Bell 7829 Arthur 4 2 Meacham Add. 20,000 7.0
Charles Armstrong 7821 Arthur 5 2 Meacham Add. 0 0.0
Glen & Linda willis 7820 Arthur 5 1 Meacham Add. ° 0.0
_ Charles McMillian 7828 Arthur 3 1 Meacham Add. 15,000 5.3
C.A. McMillian 7824 Arthur 4 1 Meacham Add. 7,500 e 2.6
J.C. Tarwater 6333 Smithfield Rd. 1 1 Meacham Add. 8,000 2.8
Doug Vandenberg 6337 Smithfield Rd. 2 1 Meachal Add. 2,000 0.7
Dan Holt 6416 Smithfield Rd. 9 H Smithfield Add. 6,600 e 2.3
Dan Holt 6416 Smithfield Rd. 7 H Smithfield Add. 1,100 e 0.4
TOTAL AREA 133,200 SF 46.6
Note:The impact area surrounding the property in question contains
285,664 SF. The formula for calculating the requirements of
section 211.006 (d) is: 285,664 x .20 = 57,133 SF. The
petitioners area of coverage is 46.6 percent.
I
I
I
R-7-MF
US5&
1-1
J ~; .,:
I
l
'Ie
il
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 15
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
Mr. Barfield said we might need to
that so he will not have to pay mo
fees, but he thinks we should g.
the chance to come back and a ess
the issues. He said the C rman can
re-open the Public Heari at that
meeting.
Mr. Bowen said cannot use a
specific use. said if you have a
specific use ou have that use plus
all the ot uses. He also stated
that sp fic use for a cabinet shop
is no 110wed in C-2.
. Barfield made a motion to table
his request until the next meeting
until the City Attorney has a chance
to direct us if we can pick and choose
items in the industrial zoning and
give the owner a chance to address
this issue. This motion was seconded
by Mr. Bowen. The motion failed by a
vote of 3-4 with Lueck, Marin, Collins
and Miller voting against.
Mr. Collins made the motion to deny
PZ 91-11. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Marin and the motion carried 4-3
with Brock, Bowen, and Barfield voting
against denial.
Mr. Bowen stated that his vote against
denial was just to allow the requester
to have a say.
5.
PZ 91-12
Public Hearing for request of Oscar
Trevino Jr. with J.L. Steele, Inc. to
rezone Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Meacham
Addition, from their present
classification of R-2 Single Family
Residential to C-2 Commercial. This
property is located on the west side
of Smithfield Road between Guy Street
and Arthur Drive.
Chairman Brock opened the Public
Hearing and called for anyone wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
I Page 16
P & Z Minutes
Ie May 9, 1991
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Oscar Trevino came forward. He said
his business is presently located at
8208 Northeast Parkway, Suite 123,
North Richland Hills, Texas. He said
the property in question is located at
6504 Smithfield Road. He said it is 2
lots, 200 feet by 100 feet each with
200 feet of frontage on Smithfield
Road. Mr. Trevino stated the property
is bounded on three sides by
thoroughfares. He said the property
to the Northwest and across Smithfield
Road is zoned 1-2 and across Guy
Street is R-5-D Duplex. He said the
area bounded by the St. Louis
Railroad, Smithfield Road and Watauga
Road is going to need to be rezoned
within the next few years.
Mr. Trevino said their intensions, if
they get the zoning, is to renovate
the existing frame house to commercial
standards as required by the city. He
said they would keep the fenced area
as a green belt and use the remainder
for yard area. Mr. Trevino stated
that C-2 does allow up to 20% outside
storage. He said they will obtain the
main access off Smithfield Road. He
said the material to be stored on the
property would be small racks, a 16
foot trailer, and other miscellaneous
items. Mr. Trevino said the property
will also be fenced per city
specifications for C-2 zoning. He
said the noise level will be no more
than at present. He said the company
specializes in the installation of
re-enforcement steel on construction
projects. Mr. Trevino said they have
the re-enforcement steel delivered to
the job site and the delivery of
supplies to the yard will be limited
to a bob-tail truck. He said the
office staff ranges from 5 to 8
people. He said with the continued
growth in the area north of Starnes,
Smithfield Road will have an increase
in traffic.
I Page 17
Ie p & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Mr. Trevino stated that the directors
and officers of this company all live
in North Richland Hills and have an
interest in the quality of life in
this city. He said the corporation
will endeavor to keep the ascetics of
the property as good or better than it
is today. He said he has pictures of
the supplies that will be stored on
the property and also what you can see
from the front, side and back of this
property. Mr. Trevino said you can
look out one side and see Martin
Lumber Company with trucks parked
there and then you have the railroad.
Ray Bates, owner of the property, came
forward. He said the property has
been vacant for approximately 2~
years. He said the initial building
construction was 4 rooms in 1946 and
the house has been added on to. He
said it is only 1 or 2 bedroom house
and would be hard to use it as a
residence without completely
rebuilding it. Mr. Bates stated he
feels this is the best use of the
property.
Chairman Brock called for anyone else
wishing to speak in favor of this
request to please come forward.
There being no one, the Chairman
called for those wishing to speak in
opposition to this request to please
come forward.
Glenn Willis, 7820 Arthur, came
forward. He said he has several
questions that needs answered:
traffic, access to Arthur, his plans
for expansion, guarantee of storage,
there are all types of steel, a lot of
trucks, a lot of noise, hours of
operation, what kind of guarantees do
we have that he will make it ascetic
to the neighborhood.
I Page 18
P & Z Minutes
Ie May 9, 1991
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Mr. Willis stated he and his wife
spend a lot of time in their yard and
they do not want a commercial piece of
property there.
Chairman Brock asked Mr. Trevino what
his hours would be.
Mr. Trevino stated he and the Vice
President show up at 5:30 A.M. and the
men will come in to pick things up at
6:30 or 7:00 A.M. and at 5:30 P.M.,
they will all be out of the office.
Mr. Trevino said he would like to have
his main access off Smithfield Road.
He said the steel would be delivered
to the job site and tied there; he
said the delivery there would be in
bob-tail trucks; and as far as
expansion, with less than an acre,
there would not be much expansion. He
said as for as keeping the
neighborhood pretty, the fence line is
covered with brush and weeds are
standing a foot and a half high, and
the house is falling apart now;
nothing is pretty about this piece of
property. Mr. Trevino said he agrees
it is a nice neighborhood, but when
the property next to Watauga Road
sells, and a grocery store shows up
there, there will be noise there.
Mr. Barfield asked where he puts the
steel left over from a job.
Mr. Trevino said they do not purchase
the steel, they just install it. He
said they would have some racks. He
showed the Commission pictures of the
racks.
Mr. Miller asked how close they would
be to the lumber company.
Mr. Trevino said it would be about 80
feet and across Smithfield Road.
I Page 19
P & Z Minutes
Ie May 9, 1991
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Jessie Johnson, 6413 Smithfield Road,
came forward. He said he owns the
property next door to the property in
question. Mr. Johnson stated he does
not really have any objections to what
he plans to do, except he does not
want it to get to looking like 28th
Street.
Doug Van Den Berg, 6337 Smithfield
Road, came forward. He said he
believes it is true that in the
future, the property values will
increase, but he is concerned now. He
said he has a little girl that likes
to play in the yard. Mr. Van Den Berg
asked if they were permanent employees
or temporary employees. He said he
felt an 8 foot fence would be better
than a 6 foot fence.
King Bell, 7829 Arthur Drive, came
forward. He said his property is
adjacent to this property. He said he
is concerned about the noise level and
the fence.
Stephen Grove, 7808 Arthur, came
forward. He said he would like to
know how much more traffic there would
be and if they would have a cat or
fork lift. He said he was concerned
about what would happen 5-10 years
from now.
Chairman Brock called for anyone else
wishing to speak to please come
forward.
There being no one, the Chairman
closed the Public Hearing.
Chairman Brock asked Mr. Trevino to
come back to answer some questions.
Mr. Trevino stated they will restore
the building to commercial code; the
building will need to be gutted, put
in wider doors, electric will have to
be put in PVC, 80% brick is required;
I
Page 20
P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
Ie
I
I
the roof will have to be fixed; there
will be a major renovation.
I
Mr. Trevino said they have been at the
present location for 2 years and last
year they did 6~ million dollar
business. He said they do not own a
cat loader; they own one pickup, but
may buy another pickup shortly. He
said the wire is in boxes, 48 on a
palet and it is unloaded by hand.
Mr. Trevino said they have 82
employees, but only a few might come
to the office to pick up their check
early and the lead men and foremen
would come to the office. The noise
level-there is a truck company next to
this property and this should not be
any more noisy. He said they might do
a little welding from time to time.
He said there are 18 wheelers going in
and out there now. What happens in 10
years, they are not fortune tellers;
he does not know.
I
I
I
I
.
I
Chairman Brock stated this property
does not meet the one acre requirement
for C-2 zoning.
I
I
Mr. Willis came forward. He stated he
is opposed to the 6:30 A.M. He wanted
to know if there would be access to
Arthur. He said he does not want
access to Arthur.
I
Mr. Bowen stated access to Arthur
would be a platting issue, but they
would remember it. He said he wanted
to stress that they would not be
rezoning to a construction yard, they
would be rezoning to C-2 and that
means everything allowed in C-2.
I
I
PZ 91-12
APPROVED
Mr. Collins made the motion to approve
PZ 91-12. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Lueck and the motion carried 5-2
with Brock and Bowen voting against.
I
f
I
I
----- ~.. ......-
-~--. .~ ·ì- M, ,
-
§
--"'!- *'
¡
"-
~
II
.--, t..
~
s
~
~
I
I
...'1
I'
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1740
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
II
I
II
fie
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-91-12 the following described property shall
be rezoned from R-2 to C-2.
BEING Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Meacham Addition, and addition to the City of
Smithfield (now North Richland Hills), Tarrant County, Texas, out of the J.
Barlough Survey, according to plat filed in the office of the County Clerk
on April 17, 1946.
This property is located at 6504 Smithfield Road.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF MAY, 1991.
Il ~ CHA~N
, fJ./ J 1 .~ ~ ^ ~
~ . J VV....v VV
ONING COMMISSION
SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
I
~
I
I
I
I-
I
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-91-12 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF
-
-
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~epartment:
Subject:
Community Development
Council Meeting Date: 6/04/91
Request of Keith & Jo Ellen Anderson for AgendaNumber?S 91-05
F1nal Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, KLA Aaa1t10n.
This property is located on the east side of
Crane Road, south of Amundson Road.
Mr. Keith Anderson has submitted a Final Plat for a one lot
subdivision on a . 4·8 acre tract of land located on Crane Road. The
lot is served by water, but as yet sewer service is not available.
The city of North Richland Hills will be extending a new sewer line
along Crane Road later this summer as part of an assessment program.
The owners have agreed to sign a covenant to bind him to pay his fair
share of the construction of Crane Road, sidewalks and drainage
improvements at some point in the future. The plat was reviewed and
approved by the Planning and Zoning commission at their May 23rd
meeting.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of
the Planning and Zoning commission.
e
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
e Operating Budget
Other
b~
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
.
~
¿l/(c7Ñ
I City Manager
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
--
I-' AG
156.
í/
I "
I '
\\
\ \
\ ' ,.
\ '" 4-1
SU
, ,
\ \
,........
, , F:f?
I"
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
MAY 23, 1991 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by
Chairman James Brock at 7:30 P.M
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Members
J s Brock
avid Barfield
Ron Lueck
Don Collins
Pat Marin
Paul Miller
Barry LeBaron
Steve Pence
Wanda Calvert
Dir. Comm ty Dev.
Buildi Official
P & Coordinator
Don Bowen
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF MAY 9, 1991
Ms. Marin made a motion to approve the
minutes as written.
Mr. Lueck said he had a correction on
page one. He said he was the one who
nominated David Barfield for Chairman.
Mr. Barfield said there is another
correction, page 9, first sentence
should be "Mr. Barfield said it would"
affect her property.
Ms. Marin amended her motion to
approve the minutes with these
changes. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Miller and the motion carried 6-0.
1 .
PS 91-05
Request of Keith & Jo Ellen Anderson
for Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, KLA
Addition. This property is located on
Crane Road, south of Amundson Road.
I
I
,I
Ie
I
Chairman Brock stated that Mr.
Anderson has agreed to all the
engineer's comments.
PS 91-05
APPROVED
Mr. Barfield made the motion to
approve PS 91-05 subject to the
engineer's comments. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Lueck and the motion
carried 6-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Owen D. Long and Associates, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
May 16, 1991
Mrs. Wanda Calvert
Planning and Zoning Coordinator
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: PS 91-05; KLA Addition
Lot 1, Block 1 - Final Plat
Dear Wanda:
We have a copy of John A. Johnston1s letter dated May 16, 1991 regarding
the above project and have the following comments:
Final Plat
1. The current zoning will be shown on the plat, as requested.
Water and Sewer
2. The Owner/Developer understands that he will not be issued a
permit until the award of the contract on the sewer main.
Gene ra 1
3. The Owner/Developer is willing to sign a covenant with the City
binding him to pay his fair share of the street improvements for
Crane Road.
4. The Owner/Developer is meeting with T.U. Electric pertaining to the
street light and he is willing to pay for the installation of a
new street light, if required.
5. The Owner/Developer states that he has paid all taxes, fees and
assessments due the City and has furnished the City with copies of
tax receipts.
6. Better blueline copies will be provided with the next submittal.
Let me know if you need additional information.
(Zi¡~ 1 ,
/Jf:
. )r.
ODL/ml
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Keith Anderson
401 Ma,iñ5~~J&ncR1.1ne-R~Mr~~uláq~a / Hurst. Texas 76054/ Phone (817) 281-8121
I
I _ City of JXòrth Richland Hills
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
May 16, 1991
Ref: PWM 91-042
MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: John A. Johnston, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: PS 91-05; KLA ADDITION;
Lot 1, Block 1; Final Plat
We have reviewed the subject plat received in our office on April 30, 1991,
and offer the following comments.
Final Plat
1. The current zoning for the remainder tract described to Irma Card as
recorded in Vol. 1490, page 631, D.R.T.C.T. should be shown on the plat.
Water and Sewer
2. The building permit for this property should not be issued until the
contract for the sewer main extension for Crane Road has been awarded by
City Council.
General
3. The developer should sign a covenant with the City binding him and/or
future property owners to pay their fair share of the construction cost
of streets, drainage and sidewalks for Crane Road. An executed covenant
should be provided to the City prior to the consideration of the plat by
City Council. The developer has been supplied with a covenant for his
signature with a copy of this memo.
4. The developer should coordinate with TU Electric the layout and design
of the street lights which will serve this property. The cost for
installation will be paid by the developer directly to TU Electric. The
developer should provide the City with an approved street light layout
and a photocopy of TU Electric's agreement to install the referenced
street lights prior to the consideration of this plat by City Council.
5. The developer should pay all taxes, fees and assessments due the City
prior to the consideration of the plat by City Council.
(817) 281-0041
· 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
PWM 91-042
May 16, 1991
Page 2
6. The blueline copies of the plat and supporting documents are "light" and
difficult to read. The next plat submittal should include a higher
quality set of prints.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this
office.
0~A0~ 1:-
JAJ/smm
cc: Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works/utilities
Mr. Barry LeBaron, Director of Community Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Communi tv Development
Council Meeting Date: 5/28/91
Subject:
Request of Tecnol( Inc. for Replat AgendaNumber~S 91-07
of Tracts 5R & 6R, NRH Industrial Park Addition
Tecnol, Inc. has submitted a replat of their property located in the
NRH Industrial Park Addition on Industrial Park Boulevard. The replat
consists of two lots and the purpose of the replat is to increase the
size of Lot 5 to allow for the proposed construction of a new
building. The replat does not require the construction of any new
streets or extension of any new utilities. However, the company has
agreed to all engineering comments except for the requirements to
construct a sidewalk and street lights as a part of the new
development.
Enclosed is a letter from Mr. Van Hubbard, President of Tecnol, Inc.
formally requesting a variance from the sidewalk and street light
requirements. A representative from the company will be attending the
meeting and be available to answer questions from the City Council.
Recommendation:
~ It is recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget _
Other ~
(3~ ßcu~
D~artment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~
RR~
Ity Manager
. Finance Director
Pa e 1 of
I
I
I
I
I
I
Tecnol, Inc. has recently purchased property to the south, adjacent
to the existing Tecnol property and facility in the NRH Industrial Park.
It is our intention to utilize this property for future expansion
programs. We are currently in the process of replatting these
propèrties - removing the new property from Tract 6R and combining it
l4IJith the existing property Tract SR.
It has been brought to our attention by Mr. John Johnston,
Assistant Director of Public Norks, that to satisfy city codes as
specified in the Subdivision Design Manual both sidewalks and
streetlights will be required along the south and east sides of the
property adjacent to Industrial Park Boulevard.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
...... ...... ....... .......... ........ ........ ..... ..... ..... ....... ....... .... ....... ...... ............ .... ...
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
........... ........ .... ...... .... ..... ....... .............. ............. ... ...... .... ... ........ ........... ...
..............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................. .
....... ....... ........ ................ .............. ...... ............ ...... .......... ............. ... ... .....
............................................................................................................. .
............................................................................................................. .
............................................................................................................. .
............................................................................................................. .
............................................................................................................. .
............................................................................................................. .
..................................................................................... .........................
THE INNOVATION COMPANY
May 28, 1991
The Honorable Tommy Brown
Mayor - North Richland Hills
P.o. Box 820609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76182
Dear Mr. Brown,
Please be aware that Tecnol will request a variance from these
requirements when the replat approval is heard before the City Council
on June 10, 1991. Our reasoning for this request is based on the fact
that this would be an unreasonable financial burden on Tecnol while
providing no advantage to the public, Tecnol or its employees. As an
industrial park there is no foot traffic within the area. Also, there
is no pedestrian traffic through the industrial park to access schools,
shopping areas or residential areas. In addition, Tecnol's parking lots
are well lighted, providing sufficient visibility for traffic in the
area.
Thank you for taking the time to consider this variance request.
I
7201 INDUSTRIAL PARK BLVD.
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76180
TELEPHONE: 817-581-6424
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--.
I
I
I
I
I
I e City of JXòrth Richland Hills
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
6.
I
Ie
7.
I
(817) 281-0041
ivlay 21, 1991
Ref: PWM 91-043
MEMO TO~ Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Gregory w. Dickens, P.E.
Director of Public Works/Utilities
SUBJECT: PS 91-07; N.R.H. INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION;
Lots 5R and 6R, Block 1, Replat
In an effort to further clarify the memo from John Johnston, to Planning and
Zoning dated May 3, 1991, I offer the following comments.
1. A separate civil engineering set of plans showing all public water,
sanitary sewer, street, drainage, sidewalk, and street lights should be
submitted for review. The plans should incorporate the comments from
the memo dated May 3rd.
2.
These plans should have a cover sheet which notes the legal description
of the property; states these are "site improvements for ...."; name,
address, and telephone number of the owner and engineer; and City review
approval block.
3.
The plans should also include a current copy of the replat; a site plan
showing proposed sidewalks, drive approaches and street lights; drainage
area map; and water and sewer layout, with location of existing water
and sewer lines (public and private) shown with their easements for the
entire piece of property to be replatted.
4.
Please clearly note the throat width and curb return radii for the new
drive approach on the site plan.
5.
Include "General Notes" from our Design Manual on the appropriate plan
sheets.
Please note clearly which water and sewer lines shown on the water and
sewer layout are public or private with their size.
A Mobil Oil Company Pipeline Easement exists along the west side of Lot
SR. The City will need a copy of the permission agreement with Mobil
Oil Company concerning your location of drive approach, driveway, and
parking lot over this easement. We need a copy prior to you beginning
construction over this easement.
· 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
PWM 91-043
May 21, 1991
Page 2
8. Sidewalks and street lights will only be required adjacent to Lot SR.
Lot 6R will be required to install sidewalks and street lights as part
of their request for a building permit.
The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer
of his responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable construction
plans. The City's eventual approval of the construction plans will not
signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for
the engineering in the bid documents.
..t/'
~~
/'
GWD/srrpI
\- -~
^û"
,fXj&,
.....,
I Page 4
Ie P & Z Minutes
May 9, 1991
I
2. PS 91-07
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I PS 91-07
APPROVED
I
I 3. PZ 91-10
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Request of Tecnol, Inc. for Replat of
Lots 5R & 6R, Block 1, NRH Industrial
Park Addition. This property is
located on Industrial Park Boulevard,
east of Rufe Snow Drive.
Mr. LeBaron stated that Tecnol was
needing to expand and they have
purchased additional property and are
platting it into one lot.
Max Reeves with Tecnol, came forward.
He said they have a 12 plus acre tract
known as lot 5R and have recently
purchased a 5 plus acre tract from RTC
and requests it be removed from lot 6R
and added to lot 5R. Mr. Reeves said
they plan to expand the present
facility and also have future plans to
some day build another facility on the
new property.
Mr. Reeves stated he has no problems
with the Engineer's comments.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 91-07 subject to the Engineer's
comments and the stipulation that a
signature line be added on the plat
for RTC to sign. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Miller and the motion
carried 7-0.
Public Hearing for request of the Ci
of North Richland Hills to rezo
lots in Diamond Loch Additi
their present classifi on
Duplex to R-l Sin amily
Residential.
Mr. aron stated that a large part
Diamond Loch Addition is currently
zoned duplex and has been for
approximately 20 years, but could only
find one duplex built there; the
others were build single family. He
said there are 2 problems; the duplex
zoning classification "R-5-D" no
longer exists; we only have R-4-SD
duplex which has different
requirements.
I
Ie City of jXòrth Richland Hills
I
I
I
I
May 3, 1991
Ref: PWM 91-033
MEMO TO:
Planning and Zoning Commission
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
FROM: John A. Johnston, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: PS 91-07; N.R.H. INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION
Lots 5R & 6R, Block 1
Replat
We have reviewed the subject documents received in our office on April 12,
1991 and offer the following comments.
Plat
1. The surveyor should sign and seal the plat prior to the next
submittal.
2. The title block should be revised to read:
I
I
I
Ie
I
FINAL PLAT
Lots 5R and 6R, Block 1
N.R.H. Industrial Park
An Addition to the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas
John Yates Survey
Abstract No. 1753
Tarrant County, Texas
Being a replat of Tracts 5 and 6
NRH Industrial Park
An Addition to the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas
John Yates Survey
Abstract No. 1753
Tarrant County, Texas
3. The name, address and telephone number of the surveyor should be added
to the plat. If A.R.S. Engineers, Inc. is the surveyor, the label
"Engineer/Surveyor:" may be added to the plat.
(817) 281-0041
· 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180
I
Ie
I
PWM 91-033
May 3, 1991
Page 2
4. The attached easement dedication should be incorporated into the
owner's acknowledgement.
I
5.
The new location of the proposed fire hydrants should be within a
dedicated water line easement.
I
6.
All waterline easements which no longer encompass active water lines
should be abandon.
I
Construction Plans
I
7. The fire hydrant radius of coverage should be shown. The Design
Manual for Public Works/Utilities for the City of North Richland Hills
should be consulted for the required radius of coverage.
I
8. The appropriate details for construction should be included in the
plans. Note that the details included in the Design Manual do not
contain any logos other than that of the City of North Richland Hills.
It is therefore recommended that the details be used in their
entirety.
I
~
9. The developer should coordinate with TU Electric the layout and design
of the street lights which will serve this property. The cost for
installation will be paid by the developer directly to TU Electric.
The developer should provide the City with an approved street light
layout and a photocopy of TU Electric's agreement to install the
referenced street lights.
I
10. Prior to the beginning of construction of public utilities, a
preconstruction conference shall be held at the City Service Center
with the Assistant Director of Public Works or Utilities, a City
Inspector, the Developer's Engineer, the Developer's representative,
and the Contractors present.
I
I
11. The developer should provide the City with four (4) blueline copies of
approved signed plans at the preconstruction conference.
I
12. The developer should provide the City with two (2) copies of executed
contract documents which include Contractor's proposal and two (2)
year maintenance bond for 20% of the total contract made out on the
City of North Richland Hills' form. These are required prior to the
preconstruction conference.
I
I
13. All fees owed the City should be paid prior to the preconstruction
conference. This includes 4% of contract cost for inspection fee for
water and sewer improvements and a $25.00 fee for testing the water
lines.
I
f
14. The developer should provide the Assistant Director of Public Works or
Utilities with a copy of the final Contractor's estimates signed by
the City Inspector.
I
I ~ .
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
PWM 91-033
May 3, 1991
Page 3
15. The developer should provide the City with the following "as built"
plans prior to the City's final acceptance of the project: one (1)
35mm microfilm copy on labeled aperture cards; three (3) full size
blueline copies.
16. Sidewalks will be required for this subdivision and should therefore
be incorporated into the final plans.
The marked-up plans given to the engineer should be returned with the next
resubmittal.
The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design
engineer of his responsibility to provide adequate, accurate and buildable
construction plans. The City's eventual approval of the construction plans
will not signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland
Hills for the engineering in the bid documents.
cc: Gregory W. Dickens, Director of Public Works/Utilities
Barry LeBaron, Director of Community Development
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Communi tv Development
Council Meeting Date: 5/28/91
SUbject:
Request of Birdville I.S.D. for Final Plat
of Lot 1, Block 1, Green Valley Addition.
Agenda Number:pS 91-08
Birdville I.S.D. has submitted a Final Plat for a one lot development
located at the northeast corner of Smithfield Road and Green Valley
Drive. The purpose of the plat is to allow for the construction of a
new elementary school site. The school district has agreed to
construct their half of Smithfield Road and half of Green Valley
Drive. Water and sewer extensions across the school tract as a part
of this development will make these services available for the
development of adjacent tracts in the future. The Planning and Zoning
Commission reviewed and approved this Final Plat at their May 23rd
meeting. The Final Plat should be approved subject to engineering
comments.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
o .
-
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
-
í5~
tIJ-
, Finance Director
I
ment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
"I
Ie
I
I ,_
I
I
I
I
I
le-
I
,1
..
I
AG
R-3
'1158s
R-2
1558
t:
I. I III -=
111 Jb
:'
KILLI.
R-2
~I09
-
'"
R-2
,'*"'" ,'" ..
1 u-
",...
--
:AG
r---- -- "-
1153 '
~-------~ \
__ _ _ .L..
.~u ii
I~ '
- ~I
.¿ ] ¡ hi L 1 ~:==
~~~~t;r~,~~
R-2
131'4
I '1;!: I
;;;,;,¡;;;¡;¡ ~
1
A(1 ,_
u
R-2
1529
R-2
143.
~
\
-
-
...
R-8- 1500
453
-:::~
" -
R-2
121T
.
R-I
:'I ~.
I I ¡
~--~~-
AG
~
i
!
C-I
'424
~
0-2
~4U
\\
C-2
R---2
142.
R-2
1451
C-2
1311
1434
~ ..,,--~
R-2.-\aOo ~
R-2
1433
['(,
II IT 11
I
l
R-2
1&15
.........
AG
u..~ ~. VAL
~\
R-2
U1'1
SMAIJ "_ft,,,
U
~
.¡
-
-OAO
300'
- ~
--~~
- -
- -
_ll_
- -
;æ:= 1
/'Y' ! f I
r
AG
!!' I l'
kJ"" ¡r' T_ rr I~
I II l-
imA.... ¡¡¡¡;.~ I_a_~ ¡ : '--
I T I~"': it
r:s: ~ -L=
0-1 -
1320 ~- ~~ I"~ -
R-
"
"-
~ R-7-MF
~ II..
P
¡.-
I
---4
--.J
--.¡-...
~{~
I-¡---
- - ~
- --
~ ~
t=¡ =
--- -..
t= =1
I
WI'(" œw'
A~ II AG
:Jüi.. I ¡'l W V LJL - "C'-í
-- J---< ~ fl..
I I I I I T\ \ I I I i~
LJ -d!r-I
R-3 ~ =
, :
Jg. -
C-I~r, 1-21 C-2
-
I'~~ 'A
w
~
C-I
1183
~
C-2 ==
,
...
C 2J:J- I.
".2 ~
~1f -
).
- ..
f ~
.......
~
,¥}' m -
tV I -L,µ ~.
I~ ~~i
C-I sU;IEi:
c- 51
OQ ~-~-
o é.J-';~ - ~
::: ~,
- ~1IIIIIIIt
-~ /
r = II r:::::::1:'f : ~
.~'. "
~ ~
, ..- /711 1 "
TL#I1I ~ ..J
, ,
~
'1 Page 2
P & Z Minutes
Ie May 23, 1991
I
I 2. PS 91-08
I
I
I
I
I PS 91-08
APPROVED
Ie
3. PZ 91-14
I
I
I II
I
I
II
II
~
I
Request of Birdville I.S.D. for Final
Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Green Valley
Addition. This property is located at
the northeast corner of Smithfield
Road and Green Valley Drive.
Chairman Brock stated they had
answered all the engineer's comments
and have agreed to them.
Mr. LeBaron said they have agreed to
the engineer's comments and Mr. Bill
Cypert with B.I.S.D. and Mr. Larry
Stone with Schrickel & Rollins
Engineers are present if the
Commission has any questions.
Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve
PS 91-08 subject to the engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Marin and the motion carried 6-0.
Public Hearing for request of the
of North Richland Hills to rezone
Blocks 1 through 4, Woodland 0
Addition, from the present
classification of R-2-18 square foot
houses to R-2-2300 s re foot houses.
This subdivision· located on the
west side of cinct Line Road, north
of Martin
said he has a personal and
nancial position in this case and
would withdraw from discussion and
refrain from voting.
Mr. Barfield said he lives adjacent to
this property and he signed the
petition that initiated this request
so he would abstain from voting.
Chairman Brock opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
'I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I)
I
I
I
I
..
I
May 16, 1991
Kevin Miller, P.E.
Page 2
6) Comnent: This plat fronts on both Keller-Smithfield Road and Green
Valley Road. Access is being requested to both streets and
significant volumes of traffic are anticipated. Due to the
burden placed on both roads, both roads should be improved.
The plans recently submitted indicate improvements to the
east side of Keller-Smithfield and the intersection at Green
Valley · Green Valley Road should be improved to provide
curb and gutter along the north right-of-way. The
Subdi vision Ordinance requires that the Developer provide
his portion of these improvements. Conment #5 of Public
Works Memo dated December 19, 1990, requested that the
Engineer submit a preliminary plan ".. . showing the proposed
paving improvements for Keller-Smithfield and Green Valley
Roads · " These improvements are required by Ordinance and
are necessary to the proposed Subdivision. The construction
plans should therefore be revised as appropriate.
Response: We have designed an improved section for Green Valley Road
as requested.
7) Conment: The minimum driveway spacing allowed on Major Collectors is
three hundred feet. The driveway at 2+00 and 3+00 should be
combined and one approach located at 2+50.
Response: This conment has been forwarded to BISD and
Vestal-Loftis-Kalista, architects for the school site, to be
resolved with the City staff.
8) Conunent: Street Lighting is required by section 1-06 of the Design
Manual. The locations of any existing street lights should
be shown on the plans to confirm compliance with current
ordinances. Any additional street lights which may be
required based on current ordinances should be coordinated
with Public Works and TU Electric. The cost for
installation of any additional street lights will be paid by
the developer directly to TO Electric.
Response: We have shown street lights on the paving plans.
9) Comment: The Preliminary Drainage Study was previously reviewed.
Comnent #1 of Public Works Memo dated December 19, 1990,
requested that the Engineer submit an application for a
Conditional Letter of Map Revision prior to approving the
Final Plat. The City is obligated to require a map revision
to stay in compliance with the Community Rating System.
Response: The application for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision is
included with this submittal.
'I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
May 16, 1991
Kevin Miller, P.E.
Page 3
10) COßlDent:
Response:
11) Conment:
An Engineer Certification should be added to the drainage
calculation sheet. An example certification is included in
the Subdivision Ordinance.
The Engineer's Certification has been added to the drainage
calculation sheet.
The Design Manual requires that all sewer mains be installed
"...to the borders of the subdivision as required for future
extensions of the collection system. II An appropriate size
sewer main should therefore be extended to Green Valley
Road. This extension will allow future extension and
development to the South and West.
Response: An 8" sewer main has been extended to Green Valley Road.
12) Conment: There are numerous comments regarding the engineering and
construction plans. These cOIIll1ents are recorded on a set of
blueline construction plans. The plans have been returned
to the Engineer for revision. Due to the quantity and
magnitude of the conments, Public Works is recommending that
this plat and construction plans be revised prior to
submitting to the Planning and Zoning Conmission. The
marked-up bluelines should be returned with the next
submittal.
Response: We have addressed the additional comments and are submitting
two sets of revised plans along wi th the original comments
as requested.
Thank you for your assistance on this project.
Yours very truly,
SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
.~ ^.~/
.-=:>< ~ L--<:'="~
Larry D. Stone. P.E.
LDS:jh
'I
Ie City of jXörth Richland Hills
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
Ie
I
I
I)
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
April 30, 1991
Ref: PWM 91-032
MEMO TO:
Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM:
Kevin B. Miller, P.E.
Assistant Director of Utilities
SUBJECT:
PS 91-08; Green Valley Addition; Block 1, Lot 1;
Final Plat and Construction Plans
I have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on April 9,
1991 and offer the following comments.
1.
The Metes and Bounds Description and the exhibit are not in agreement.
The discrepancy occurs in the third call. This should be resolved.
2.
The appropriate signatures should be added to the Owner's Acknowledgment
and Dedication. In addition the Surveyor's seal and signature should be
added to the plat.
3.
The attached easement dedication should be included in the Owner's
Dedication.
4.
All offsite easements and exhibits should be prepared and forwarded to
the Public Works Department for review. The signed easements should be
transmitted to the Public Works Department for filing with the approved
Final Plat.
5.
All zoning for this lot and the adjacent lots should be clearly
indicated on the face of the plat.
6. This plat fronts on both Keller-Smithfield Road and Green Valley Road.
Access is being requested to both streets and significant volumes of
traffic are anticipated. Due to the burden placed on both roads, both
roads should be improved. The plans recently submitted indicate
improvements to the east side of Keller-Smithfield and the intersection
at Green Valley. Green Valley Road should be improved to provide curb
and gutter along the north right-of-way. The Subdivision Ordinance
requires that the Developer provide his portion of these improvements.
Comment #5 of Public Works Memo dated December 19, 1990, requested that
the Engineer submit a preliminary plan "...showing the proposed paving
improvements for Keller-Smithfield and Green Valley Roads." These
(817) 281-0041
· 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
/1
rl
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
PWM 91-032
April 30, 1991
Page 2
improvements are required by Ordinance and are necessary to the proposed
Subdivision. The construction plans should therefore be revised as
appropriate.
7.
The minimum driveway spacing allowed on Major Collectors is three
hundred feet. The driveways at 2+00 and 3+00 should be combined and one
approach located at 2+50.
8.
Street Lighting is required by section 1-06 of the Design Manual. The
locations of any existing street lights should be shown on the plans to
confirm compliance with current ordinances. Any additional street
lights which may be required based on current ordinances should be
coordinated with Public Works and TU Electric. The cost for
installation of any additional street lights will be paid by the
developer directly to TU Electric.
9.
The Preliminary Drainage Study was previously reviewed. Comment #1 of
Public Works Memo dated December 19, 1990, requested that the Engineer
submit an application for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision prior to
approving the Final Plat. The City is obligated to require a map
revision to stay in compliance with the Community Rating System.
10.
An Engineers Certification should be added to the drainage calculation
sheet. An example certification is included in the Subdivision
Ordinance.
11.
The Design Manual requires that all sewer mains be installed "...to the
borders of the subdivision as required for future extensions of the
collection system." An appropriate size sewer main should therefore be
extended to Green Valley Road. This extension will allow future
extension and development to the South and West.
12.
There are numerous comments regarding the engineering and construction
plans. These comments are recorded on a set of blueline construction
plans. The plans have been returned to the Engineer for revision. Due
to the quantity and magnitude of the comments, Public Works is
recommending that this plat and construction plans be revised prior to
submitting to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The marked-up blue
lines should be returned with the next submittal.
cc:
Greg W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works/Utilities
Barry LeBaron, Director of Community Development
I-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~ MP~rtment:
I ~bJect:
Public Works
Approve "No Parkingll Zone on Wuliger Way _
Ordinance No. 1729
Council Meeting Date: 5/13/91
Agenda Number: GN 91-65
I
I
I
I
il
il
j
¡Ie
II
I
il
II
I
I
I
I Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
'~perating Budget
r· Other.
The Public Works Department and the Police Department have received numerous complaints
concerning vehicles blocking visibility on Wuliger Way and have observed this dangerous
situation on several occasions.
On February 18, 1991, a meeting to discuss the parking problem in this area was held
between representatives of the H&M Foods and City departments (Public Works, Police,
Community Development, Economic Development). The representative of H&M Foods
requested the City not deploy "No Parking" signs at this location. H&M Foods suggested
they could instruct their drivers not to park along the southeast side of Wuliger Way.
The represented City departments agreed to try this approach, but if the parking
problem continued the City would proceed with a "No Parking" zone. All were in
agreement to this approach.
The problem has continued since the H&M meeting took place. This has been evidenced on
several occasions by the Police Department and the Public Works Department. H&M Foods
and Sealy Mattress have been notified by letter of our intent to request a "No Parkingll
zone be established and approved by the City Council at the first meeting in May.
The Uniform Act governing Texas Motor Vehicle Laws (Art. I, Subdivision II, Section 12)
allow local authorities to enact laws relating to traffic. Pursuant to Art. XII,
Section 96, of the Uniform Act, Local Authorities may prohibit or restrict stopping,
standing or parking of vehicles which unduly interfere with the free movement of
traffic.
Reconunendation:
staff recommends Council approve Ordinance No. 1729.
N/A
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/ A
Sufficient Funds Available
K lib'
nt Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
~.
. FInance DIrector
1
I'
,I,
if
il
f
I
,I
I
I
I
~
r
þ
--
ORDINANCE NO. 1729
In order to protect the health and safety of the City and its
inhabi tants IT IS ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1.
It shall hereafter be unlawful for any person to park or leave
unattended any motor vehicle at anytime upon the public streets or portions
thereof set out as follows:
Along the south and east side of Wuliger Way from its intersection with
Browning Drive (6400 WUliger Way), north and east to 6500 Wuliger Way.
2.
It is ordered that appropriate NO PARKING signs are authorized and
directed to be installed upon the right-of-way of the above public street
giving the public notice of these regulations.
3.
Any person violating any portion of this ordinance shall be deemed
guilty of misdemeanor and fined not in excess of $200.00.
4.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th day of May, 1991.
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
Tonuny Brown, Mayor
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
I,
Ie
'I
I
I
I r :
I
I
I
lie
.~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
I
No '''£It.IJJ~
AHN-,m£ (~~ ~ Eã~+)
5.ae Dl'\ht-
" " I · r , : t::1 L..1 - - " , '..1. ' , " 1"_ If r ' , I , .., " ''';' ¡...l.1
,
,
,
I i
~
I
-
f - ~
I
J 0 I
./" ./ ~
~/ < II T
I If LLro~ O.,,,~
~
"-. ... I
" - - ---'I
I
I
) OIl:ÞINANCE No. /7~{ì
j
I
I ~~ N'~. X'
-
--
LOop 820
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Arlmi n i ~t-r~t- i on
Council Meeting Date: 6/10 / 91
Agenda Number: GN 91-79
Subject: r'nnt-r;:¡l't- wj t-h Ät:t:nrney for the City
The City Council Committee, appointed by Mayor Brown (Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet,
Councilwoman Spurlock, Councilman Welch and Councilman Wood), has negotiated
the attached proposed contract with the Attorney for the City, Rex McEntire.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the proposed contract be approved.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
-1
K11~~
Department Head Signature City· -anager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
I
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
STATE OF TEXAS >
> PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
COUNTY OF TARRANT >
WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas (City) is
desirous of retaining the services of the Rex McEntire Law Firm
(Attorney) for a definite period of time; and
WHEREAS, the said Attorney is presently the Attorney for the
City and has been duly appointed in such capacity; and
WHEREAS, Attorney has restricted his practice in recent months
in order to accommodate the City in providing more needed services and
spending more actual time at the City Hall; and
WHEREAS, Attorney is willing to continue in the future, to be
in the City Hall, available to the Staff and Council for consultation,
on a part-time basis.
NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that:
1. The City does hereby engage the services of Attorney as
Attorney for the City for a period of three years from the
date of this agreement.
2. The Attorney shall handle all legal matters for the City
and his approval must be procured before the engagement of
the services of any legal specialist by the City.
3. The Attorney agrees to designate in advance the hours each
week when he will be available to the City Council for
consultation and advice on City legal matters. He shall
be entitled to change these hours by giving notice of the
change to the City Secretary.
4. The monthly retainer to be paid Attorney shall be the
retainer he is receiving at the time of approval of this
agreement, subject to the changes provided for below.
5. During the term of this agreement, the City agrees to
furnish offices (size to be jointly approved by the
Attorney and the City manager) in the Municipal Complex.
Attorney agrees to pay the City $250 per month for the
offices, equipment and supplies.
6. City agrees to furnish one private (unlisted) phone line
in the office of the Attorney as well as the standard City
extension. The City shall not be liable for any long
distance phone calls made by Attorney on non-City
business, and if any such calls are made by Attorney he
shall, upon demand, reimburse the City for any such calls.
I
l-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
t
Page Two
7. The City and Attorney both realize the importance of
immediately implementing a "Legal Department" by hiring a
para-legal person who will be present in the City Hall on
a daily basis and whose work will be supervised by
Attorney. Both recognize that the City's needs may not
require a full-time employee at this time and both agree
to cooperate in implementing such a program at the
earliest practicable date. Any para-legal hired will be
approved by Attorney before hire. Until such time as the
need arises for the para-legal to become a full-time
employee, the Attorney agrees to pay 25% of the para-
legal's salary until October 1, 1993 and 10% thereafter.
8. The Attorney will provide all legal services including (1)
advice to and consultation with staff and elected
officials, (2) approval and editing of ordinances and
resolutions prepared by Staff or Council, (3) drafting of
ordinances and resolutions which require attorney-
expertise, (4) preparation and/or approval of City
contracts of all kinds, (5) preparation of conveyance
documents to or from the City, and (6) attendance at
Council Meetings as need requires and general legal
services to each department of the City.
The Attorney shall also represent the City in all
litigation and shall be paid separately for services
involving litigation at the rate of $100 per hour.
Attorney agrees that his charge for court appearances and
actual trial will be limited to the same hourly rate of
$100 per hour.
9. The retainer fee referred to in paragraph 4, above, will
be increased by $500 per month on October 1, 1992 and
shall thereafter remain constant during the term of this
agreement.
10. The tenure of the contract is secured by the retainer.
The contract period shall be three years from date of
signing. Either party may terminate the agreement at the
end of the three year period by giving notice in writing
to the other party at least 90 days prior to the end of
the three year period; if such notice is not given by
either party the contract shall remain in full force and
effect for an additional two year period.
11. The rights and duties of Article VI, Section 6, of the
City Charter are given to and imposed upon the attorney.
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1991.
Ie
il
II
:1
I
f
II
I
I
I
f
I
Page Three
12. Except for the Black Statutes (a set of which is now owned
by the City), attorney agrees to furnish his own law
library. The City agrees to budget the sum of $700 per
year for law library update and purchase of municipal law
periodicals, NIMLO membership, and books to be purchased
at the direction of Attorney. The permanent municipal law
books purchased shall remain the property of the City.
The City agrees to pay travel expenses and registration at
approved seminars and conventions.
13. Attorney agrees not to accept private litigation against
any neighboring city which is contiguous with the
boundaries of North Richland Hills.
14. Attorney agrees to accept no private litigation against
this City for a period of at least two years from the end
of this agreement or any subsequent professional service
contract he may enter into with the City after expiration
of this contract.
APPROVED AND SIGNED this
day of
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
BY:
City Manager
REX McENTIRE AND MICHAEL McENTIRE
BY:
Attorney
---........
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Administration
Appointment to the Planning and Zoning
Subject: Commission and Capital Improvement
Advisory Committee
Council Meeting Date: 6/10/91
Agenda Number: GN 91-80
City Council appointed Mr. Dennis Stout as Alternate to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and Capital Improvement Advisory Committee at the May 13, 1991
Council Meeting. Mr. Stout has advised that due to a conflict he is unable to
serve. It has been recommended that Mr. Wayne Moody be appointed as Alternate
to these boards.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council appoint Mr. Wayne Moody as Alternate
to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Capital Improvement Advisory
Committee.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
Operating Budget
71~JøJ /;~~~~; 1;~t¡A~ _~
\. f Department Head Signature ~ger
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I'
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I_Department: Administration
~ Lone Star Gas Rate Increase Request _
I Subject: Ordinance No. 1742
I
I
I Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council take
recommendation regarding Ordinance No. 1742.
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
1_ Operating Budget
~ Other
I
Council Meeting Date: 6/10/91
Agenda Number: GN 9 1- 81
On February 25, 1991, the City Council suspended a rate increase request from
Lone Star Gas Company for 90 days from the proposed March 14th effective date.
The 90 day suspension period will expire June 14th. The Attorney for the City
will give a verbal recommendation on recommended Council action at the June
10th Council meeting.
action on the Attorney IS
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
/)
-elf1 .-r ~
Department Head Signature ( City ~ager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
Ie
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1742
AN ORDINANCE FIXING AND DETERMINING THE GENERAL SERVICE RATE
TO BE CHARGED FOR SALES OF NATURAL GAS TO RESIDENTIAL AND
COMMERCIAL CONSUMERS IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR THE MANNER IN WHICH SUCH
RATE MAY BE CHANGED, ADJUSTED, AND AMENDED; APPROVING THE
ELIMINATION OF THE COMMERCIAL CONTRACT PUBLIC SCHOOL RATE;
PROVIDING FOR THE RECOVERY OF ANY CURRENT OR UNRECOVERED
PRIOR RATE CASE EXPENSE, PROVIDING FOR A SCHEDULE OF SERVICE
CHARGES, AND PROVIDING FOR A MAIN LINE EXTENSION RATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Subject to the following provisos effective with gas bills
rendered on and after thirty (30) days from the final date of passage of this
ordinance, the maximum general service rate for sales of natural gas rendered to
residential and commercial consumers within the city limits of North Richland
Hills, Texas, by Lone Star Gas Company, a Division of ENSERCH CORPORATION, a
Texas Corporation, its successors and assigns, is hereby fixed and determined as
set forth in Item A, in the Attachment hereto which is incorporated herein.
This ordinance also approves the elimination of the Commercial Contract Public
- School Rate and the placement of those customers receiving said rate on the
commercial rate set forth in Item A in the attachment hereto.
Proviso No. (1): If this ordinance is finally passed and approved
before the effective date stated in the Statement of Intent the new rates shall
be effective with gas bills rendered on and after thirty (30) days from the
final date of passage of this ordinance for the good cause of reducing regula-
tory lag.
Proviso No. (2): If this ordinance is finally passed and approved
after a period of suspension, the new rates shall be billable immediately in
order to reduce regulatory lag. This provision is an exercise of the regulatory
authority's discretion to establish the effective date of rates at anytime after
jurisdiction attaches, and its authority pursuant to State law to establish
rates for any period of suspension.
SECTION 2. The residential and commercial rates set forth above shall
be adjusted upward or downward from a base of $4.0200 per Mcf by a Gas Cost
Adjustment Factor expressed as an amount per thousand cubic feet (Mcf) of
natural gas for changes in the intracompany city gate rate charge as authorized
by the Railroad Commission of Texas or other regulatory body having jurisdiction
for gas delivered to the North Richland Hills Distribution System, according to
Item B, in the Attachment hereto which is incorporated herein. The rates in
Item A shall also be adjusted according to Item C in the attachment hereto which
is the Weather Normalization Adjustment.
SECTION 3. Company shall also receive tax adjustments according to
Item D, in the Attachment hereto which is incorporated herein.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
fl
r
:1
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
SECTION 4. In addition to the aforesaid rates, Company shall have the
right to collect such reasonable charges as are necessary to conduct its busi-
ness and to carry out its reasonable rules and regulations in effect. The
charges set forth in Items E, F and G, in the Attachment hereto which is incor-
porated herein, are approved. Services for which no charge is set out may be
performed and charged for by Company at a level established by the normal forces
of competition.
SECTION 5. In addition to the aforesaid rates, Company is authorized
to recover the current and any unrecovered prior rate case expense through a
surcharge designed for a six-month nominal recovery period. The surcharge per
Mcf will be calculated by dividing the rate case expense to be recovered by one-
half of the adjusted annual sales volume to residential and commercial custom-
ers. The Company will provide monthly status reports to account for the
collection.
SECTION 6. The rates set forth in this ordinance may be changed and
amended by either the City or Company in the manner provided by law. Service
hereunder is subject to the orders of regulatory bodies having jurisdiction, and
to the Company's Rules and Regulations currently on file in the Company's
office.
SECTION 7. It is hereby found and determined that said meeting at
which this ordinance was passed was open to the public, as required by Texas
- law, and that advance public notice of the time, place and purpose of said
meeting was given.
A.D. 19
PASSED AND APPROVED on this the
day of
ATTEST:
Secretary
Mayor
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
Ie
I
I, , Secretary of the City of North Rich1and
Hills, Tarrant County, Texas hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a
true and correct copy of an ordinance passed and approved by the City Council of
the City of North Rich1and Hills at a session held on the
day of , 19 as it appears of record in the Minutes of
said Council in Book , Page
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF TARRANT §
WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF SAID CITY, THIS THE
A. D. 19 .
day of
Secretary
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
fl
I
,I
Ie
I
ATTACHMENT TO ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
LONE STAR GAS COMPANY
TARIFFS & SCHEDULES
ITEM A. Rates
The following rates are the maximum applicable to residential and com-
mercial consumers per meter per month or for any part of a month for
which gas service is available at the same location.
Residential:
Customer Charge
All Consumption
@
$ 7.0000
5.2020 Per Mcf
If the service period is less than 28 days in a month the
customer charge is $0.2500 times the number of days service.
Commercial:
Customer Charge
First 20 Mcf
Next 30 Mcf
Over 50 Mcf
@
@
@
$12.0000
5.4478 Per Mcf
5.1478 Per Mcf
4.9978 Per Mcf
If the service period is less than 28 days in a month the
customer charge is $0.4286 times the number of days service.
Bills are due and payable when rendered and must be paid within
fifteen days from the monthly billing date.
Residential Off-Peak Sales Discount:
An off-peak sales discount of $.25 per Mcf will apply to residen-
tial customers volume purchased in excess of 8 Mcf for each of the
billing months May through October.
ITEM B. Gas Cost Adjustment
Each monthly bill at the above rate shall be adjusted for gas cost as
follows:
(1)
The city gate rate increase or decrease applicable to current
billing month residential and commercial sales shall be estimated
to the nearest $0.0001 per Mcf based upon:
(a) A volume factor of 1.0312 determined in establishing the above
rates for the distribution system as the ratio of adjusted
purchased volumes divided by adjusted sales volumes.
(b) The city gate rate estimated to be applicable to volumes
purchased during the current calendar month, expressed to the
nearest $0.0001 per Mcf (shown below as tiRe").
(c) The base city gate rate of $4.0200 per Mcf.
I,
(2) Correction of the estimated adjustment determined by Item B (1)
above shall be included as part of the adjustment for the second
following billing month. The correcting factor (shown below as
"C") shall be expressed to the nearest $0.0001 per Mcf based upon:
Ie
I
I
(a) The corrected adjustment amount based upon the actual city
gate rate, less
(b) The estimated adjustment amount billed under Item B (1) above,
divided by
1
(c) Distribution system residential and commercial sales Mcf
recorded on the Company's books during the prior year for
the month that the correction is included as part of the
adjustment.
I
1
I
I
(3) The adjustment determined by Item B (1) and Item B (2) above shall
be multiplied by a tax factor of 1.06226 to include street and
alley rental and state occupation tax due to increasing or
decreasing Company revenues under this gas cost adjustment
provision.
In summary, the gas cost adjustment (GCA) shall be determined to the
nearest $0.0001 per Mcf by Item B (1), Item B (2) and Item B (3) as
follows:
GCA = [Item B (1) + Item B (2)] X Item B (3)
Ie
I
II
GCA = [(1.0312) (Re - $4.0200) + C] X 1.06226
ITEM C. Weather Normalization Adjustment:
I
I
f
~
I
I
Ie
I
Effective with bills rendered during the October 1991 through April
1992 billing months, and annually thereafter for the October through
April billing months, the above residential and commercial consumption
rates for gas service will be subject to a weather normalization
adjustment each billing cycle to reflect the impact of variations in
the actual heating degree days during the period included in the bill-
ing cycle from the normal level of heating degree days during the
period included in the billing cycle. The weather normalization
adjustment will be implemented on a per Mcf basis and will be applica-
ble to the volume consumed by each customer during the period included
in the billing cycle. It will be determined separately for residential
and commercial customers based on heating degree data recorded by the
D/FW weather station. The adjustment to be made for each billing cycle
will be calculated according to the following formula:
NDD - ADD
WNA = ADD x M
Where: WNA =
NDD =
ADD =
M =
Weather normalization adjustment
Normal heating degree days during the period covered by
the billing cycle
Actual heating degree days during the period covered by
the billing cycle
Weighted average margin per Mcf included in the commod-
ity portion of the rates effective during the October
through April billing months
II· .
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
~e
I
The weather normalization adjustment will be calculated to the nearest
$.0001 per Mcf.
ITEM D. Tax Adjustment:
The tax adjustment shall be an amount equivalent to the proportionate
part of any new tax, or increased tax, or any other governmental impo-
sition, rental, fee or charge (except state, county, city and special
district ad valorem taxes and taxes on net income) levied, assessed or
imposed subsequent to July 1, 1990, upon or allocable to the Company's
distribution operations, by any new or amended law, ordinance or
contract.
ITEM E. Rate Case Expense:
ITEM F.
If rate case expense is incurred in this current case, it is the inten-
tion of Lone Star Gas Company to recover the current and any unre-
covered prior rate case expense through a surcharge designed for a
six-month nominal recovery period. The surcharge per Mcf would be
calculated by dividing the rate case expense to be recovered by one-
half of the adjusted annual sales volume to residential and commercial
customers. When a surcharge is applicable, monthly status reports will
be provided to account for the collections.
Schedule of Service Charges
(1) Reconnect Charge
In addition to the charges and rates set out above, the Company
shall charge and collect the sum of:
Schedule
Charge
8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday
5 p.m. to 8 a.m. Monday through Friday
Saturdays, Sundays and Holidays
$25.00
$40.00
$40.00
as a reconnect charge for each reconnection or reinauguration of
gas service, where service has been discontinued at the same prem-
ises for any reason, with the following exceptions.
(a) For a builder who uses gas temporarily during construction or
for display purposes.
(b) For the first occupant of the premises.
(c) Whenever gas service has been temporarily interrupted because
of system outage, service work or appliance installation done
by Company; or
(d) For any reason deemed necessary for Company operations.
(2) Returned Check Charge
A returned check handling charge of $7.50 is made for each check
returned to the Company for reasons of non-sufficient funds,
account closed, payment withheld, invalid signature or improper
preparation.
I: "
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
(3) Collection Charge
A charge of $7.00 shall be made for each instance when it is
necessary for a company employee to go to a customer's residence
or place of business in order to collect amounts owed the Company
for gas service previously rendered. This charge shall not apply
if service is terminated at the time of the collection action.
This charge shall apply to only one trip on the same amount owed.
ITEM G. Main Line Extension Rate
The charge for extending mains beyond the free limit established by
Lone Star Gas Company, or any free limit established by franchise, for
residential customers shall be the lesser of: (a) the system-wide
average cost of construction, including all overheads, for the prior
fiscal year or (b) the adjusted actual cost as determined by applying
the latest Handy-Whitman Index to the 1975 actual base cost of $2.94.
The Company shall file the calculation of such charge with the city as
soon as sufficient data is available each fiscal year. Extension to
commercial and industrial customers shall be based on actual cost per
foot.
I·i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Administration
Name for New Street from Holiday Lane
Subject: to TECNOL
Council Meeting Date: 6/10/91
Agenda Number: GN 91-82
The Council Committee (Garvin and Sibbet) has suggested that this street be
named Industrial Park Boulevard.
The committee also suggests that the section of the street that goes north to
Watauga Road (adjacent to TECNOL and crossing the railroad track) be renamed
TECNOL Boulevard.
The staff has checked with TECNOL and they are both agreeable and pleased to
have the street named TECNOL Boulevard. A map is attached.
Recommendation:
The staff and Council Committee recommend the naming of the new street be
Industrial Park Boulevard and renaming the portion from Watauga Road south to
TECNOL Boulevard.
, Finance Director
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
Operating Budget
Other æ ¡(IIA ~
Department Head Ignature (I ~~nager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
/
00
X611.7
-. :-.-. .
---
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Finance
~ Council Meeting Date:6/ 10/91
SUbject:
Proposed Write-Off Delinquent Personal
Property Tax Accounts
Agenda Number: GN 91-83
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Wayne Rohne (City's Tax Attorney) is recommending cancellation of
delinquent tax accounts. This request is made either because his office is
unable to locate the taxpayers, court costs are more than the tax or because
the corporate charter was forfeited through bankruptcy or voluntary
liquidation.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends that the attached delinquent tax accounts be canceled
from the tax roll.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
-
. Finance Director
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
~~
City Manager
Page 1 of 5
I
~.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
ROHNE, HOODENPYLE, LOBERT Be MYERS
WAYNE A. ROHNE
JERRY R. HOODENPYLE
JAMES E. LOBERT
THOMAS E. MYERS
BOARD CERTIFIED· CRIMINAL LAW
TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
1323 WEST PIONEER PARKWAY - SPUR 303
ARLINGTON. TEXAS 76013
ROGER L. HURLBUT
LYNN ROSSI SCOTT
BARBARA W. KERSH
NANCY F. ARENSON
May 20, 1991
Mr. Lee Maness, Tax Collector
City of North Richland Hills
ATTN: TAX DEPARTMENT
P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
RE:
DELINQUENT TAX ACCOUNTS
Dear Mr. Maness:
MAILING ADDRESS
~o. BOX 13010
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76094-0010
TELEPHONE: <81 7) 277-52 1 1
METRO: <81 7) 265-2841
TAX DEPT: (817) 277-0041
FAX LINE: (817) 275-3657
Attached you will find a list of accounts which I
recommend be cancelled for the reasons stated. We have diligently
worked these accounts but find them uncollectible.
Please provide written confirmation in order that we may
retire these files.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
~r very trul~
. ROHNE
WAR: 1 s
I
1- YEAR
ACCT. # NAME DUE AMOUNT REASON TO CANCEL
.
I poa1S 8312 ANTONIO'S PIZZA 1986 $ 78.73 CHARTER FORFEITED
CITY
I P0924 5782 ALISON BLASS 1986 10.05 BASE TOO SMALL
P0924 5790 LORETTA BURNS 1986 10.05 UTL
I P0927 8397 JOHN CHESTNUT 1986 2.35 UTL
I P0938 2720 EAGLE BOX CO. 1987 8.26 CHARTER DISSOLVED
P0930 7419 DAVIS PIERCE 1986 68.01 UTL
I P0931 8461 JOHN FORSLUND 1986 15.08 BASE TOO SMALL
P0931 8496 DEBORAH FORT 1986 15.08 BASE TOO SMALL
I P0944 4912 PAT FRY 1987 18.59 BASE TOO SMALL
I P0924 5847 ANNIS HARRIS 1986 10.05 BASE TOO SMALL
P0816_ 9470 SONIA N. BAUS 1986 26.56 BASE TOO SMALL
.0931 8542 PAULINE R. HILL 1986 15.08 BASE TOO SMALL
P0924 2376 DIANE HOLT 1986 10.05 BASE TOO SMALL
I P0918 7391 JONCO DEVELOPMENT 1986 22.96 UTL
I P0924 5863 ROBBIE JONES 1986 10.05 UTL
P0931 1599 CHRIS KEATING 1986 15.08 BASE TOO SMALL
I P0944 5390 BRYSTON KENNEDY 1987 18.59 BASE TOO SMALL
P0927 3638 LITTLE PETE'S 1986 71.89 CHARTER FORFEITED
I PIZZA & SUBS
P0930 9462 JOE MARGSITY 1986 4.02 BASE TOO SMALL
I P0924 2635 BRENDA MELTON 1986 32.50 CHARTER FORFEITED
P0931 8550 TREATY MCDONALD 1986 15.08 UTL
II P0918 7588 M L C FINANCIAL 1986 8.38 BASE TOO SMALL
f CORPORATION
~0927 3697 WAYNE MAYO 1986 67.50 UTL
0844 8434 MIZAR, INC. 1986 97.46 CHARTER FORFEITED
I
I
I
-. YEAR
ACCT. # NAME DUE AMOUNT REASON TO CANCEL
P0931 1858 CAROL MORRIS 1986 $ 15.08 BASE TOO SMALL
P0935 4220 JO NORSWORTHY 1987 18.59 BASE TOO SMALL
I P0931 8585 LORETTA PAGE 1986 15.08 BASE TOO SMALL
I P0935 7599 TED POSTEJOSKY 1987 18.59 BASE TOO SMALL
P0931 1963 JOHN PRICE 1986 15.08 BASE TOO SMALL
I P0924 2414 LARRY QUINN 1986 15.31 BASE TOO SMALL
P0844 4579 RISKY'S BAR-B-Q 1987 14.50 BASE TOO SMALL
I P0931 2048 LINDA RIPERT 1986 15.08 BASE TOO SMALL
P09l8 8428 RGA DEVELOPMENT 1986 14.66 CHARTER FORFEITED
I
P0846 1899 J. D. RICE 1986 25.77 UTL
I P0939 4672 DALE RHODES 1986 10.94 BASE TOO SMALL
P0939'" 3544 DABB RIVIERA 1987 3.72 BASE TOO SMALL
.0931 2064 CHRISTINE ROSE 1986 10.05 BASE TOO SMALL
P0802 2380 DORIS SCHULTZ 1986 25.57 BASE TOO SMALL
I P0917 9593 SNO-TO-GO, INC. 1986 12.89 CHARTER FORFEITED
I P0930 6730 D. B. STEVENS 1986 46.00 UTL
P0931 2250 NORMA WALKER 1986 15.08 BASE TOO SMALL
I P0931 2277 RANDY WARREN 1986 15.08 BASE TOO SMALL
P0915 8960 KAY WATSON 1986 50.55 UTL
I P0925 9910 FRANK WILLOUGHBY 1986 47.67 BASE TOO SMALL
I P0931 2501 CHARLOTTE WYNNE 1986 10.05 BASE TOO SMALL
P0931 2420 FRANK WHITE 1986 15.08 BASE TOO SMALL
I W0904 2199 JAMES M. 1984 85.91 WATERCRAFT
SWINT, JR 1985 83.42 "
1986 87.44 "
~~0936 7187 ROY DEAVER 1987 18.59 UTL
1988 43.98 "
I
~I
I
-. ACCT. #
I P0936 7381
I P0939 4559
I P0939 0677
P0949 3611
I P0931 1289
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
'-
I
I
YEAR
NAME DUE AMOUNT REASON TO CANCEL
ELAINE DESROSIERS 1987 $ 18.59 UTL
1988 43.98 "
FREDRICK RAYMOND 1987 18.59 DECEASED
1988 43.98 "
CHARLES MCMILLAN 1987 18.59 UTL
JERRY DURHAM 1987 17.17 UTL
DANA COX 1987 18.59 UTL
$1,580.70
--------
--------
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
_Ubject:
Parks and Recreation Department
Council Meeting Date:06/10/91
Agenda Number: GN 91-84
Richfield Park Lightinq Pro;ect
On April 8, 1991, the City Council authorized the Staff to have
specifications prepared and solicit bids for a sportslighting system at
Richfield Park. The Staff has been working with Bland Harper, Architect-
Construction Manager, on the preparation of project specifications and
bid documents. Mr. Harper specializes in sportslighting projects and is
currently under contract with the Hurst~Euless-Bedford School District as
well as the City of Hurst for several projects of similar scope.
Mr. Harper has agreed to provide his architectural and construction
management services for $11,000. This lump sum fee is based on
approximately 5% of the estimated construction cost.
staff, acting on Council authorization, also contracted Frank W. Neal &
Associates, Inc. to conduct a structural engineering assessment of the
existing poles and bases at Richfiel~ Park. A copy of Mr. Neal's report
is attached. In summary, 75% (18 of 24) of the existing poles around the
ballfields have "experienced significant deterioration and their
structural integrity is questionable and warrants replacement".
Also attached is a light level test report conducted by Mr. Harper and
Staff to determine and compare existing light levels at Richfield Park
with the criteria of the Illumination Enqineerinq Standards Handbook. As
detailed in the report, the existing light levels on Richfield Park
facilities average approximately 60% "below the minimum recommendations
for the proposed levels of play.
FUNDING SOURCE:
Sufficient funds are available in 01-99-00-6500.
RECOMMENDATION:
staff recommends City Council ratify the contract with Bland Harper to
provide "architectural and project management services for the park
lighting project in the amount of $11,000.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
_ Operating Budget _
. Other ~1 ~
~ ~ tW)(:u__ jbJ
Department Head Signature I City anager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
FRANI( W. NEAL
&ASSOC., INC.
Srrucrur al Engineers
April 29, 1991
City of North Richland Hills
7301 NE Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Attn: Mr. Jim Browne
Re: Light Pole Inspection
Richfield Park
7300 ,Chapman Road
North Richland Hills, Texas
Dear Mr. Browne,
Pursuant to your request I inspected the condition of the light poles and
light pole bases at the above referenced park on April 15, 1991. During my
inspection I measured the pole sizes', base plates and anchor bolts, I
evaluated tbe structural adequacy of the member sizes and I observed the base
plate elevation relative to the adjacent soil levels. You requested that I
determine the structural adequacy the poles and their anticipated
I serviceability. I was able to view the interior condition at the bottom by
removing the hand hole at the pol~ base.
As you related to me, the light poles were installed at different times. The
original light poles were erected in the mid 1970' s. Within the last few
years several additional poles have been placed. The older poles were made
in-house by the city. The more recent poles were purchased from venders. Two
of the oldest poles have recently experienced failure and have been replaced.
Cracks in several of the poles had been repaired by welding across the cracks.
The following were our observations:
1. The oldest poles and bases around the ball fields were found to be in the
follc~ing condition:
A. . The exterior surface of the pole has significant pitting. The
exterior condition appears to be the condition at the time of erection
because the exterior paint appears to be intact.
B. The interior face of the pole has experienced considerable rusting.
The rust particles have settled in the bottom of the pole.
2. The newer poles around the ball fields were found to be in the following
condition;
A. The poles do not have any rusting on the interior or exterior surface.
B. The base plate to pole connection was reinforced with stiffener
plates.
·1015 W. Broadway, Suite A
Fort Worth, Texas 76104
(8 t 7) 332- t 944
FAX (8 1 7) 336-8620
9020 360 North
Building 2, Suite 570
Austin, Texas 78759
(512) 346-3126
FAX (512) 345-9596
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
!I
I
~
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 2
3. Several of the pole bases were covered by dirt. Deterioration of the base
plate steel, by exposure to moist earth, was evident.
4. There was evidence of recent welding at the pole joints of several of the
older poles.
5. Several pole bases were loose relative to their foundation. The poles
that were most noticeable were at the outfield of the southwest ball
field.
6. The light poles around the tennis court and along the parking area
appeared to be in good .~ondition.
The following ar& my conclusions and recommendations:
1. The older ball field poles have experienced significant deterioration and
their structural integrity does not appear good. Additionally, the base
connection of several poles is loose which allows this connection to
continue to deteriorate. In my opinion, these poles have questionable
integrity and warrant replacement.
2. The pole to base plate connections that are under soil should be remedied
by excavating the dirt to a level 6" below the top of the concrete
foot~ng. The soil grades should be reworked so water is not allowed to
sit around the pole connection.
3. The newer poles around the ball. fields, the· tennis court poles. and the
parking area poles appear to be in good condition and, other than the
remedial action mentioned in note 2 above, they appear to be performing
adequately for their intended purpose.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Yours truly, .
-fA~ l)J \ 0 ~~
......~"',,..
~.. ~ OF 7':"\,
;~ ~~.......~~ \,
1'* ,,~.... '* '..~..
E·L.····,·---'il\
F.RANK )VE~T ~EAl ~
..\·..-----.40 ¥4.......Z....¡
-0.\ 424QC 0: ¡.t
~~:p~. ~~. ~~, ~:.
1~~..;!1lsT~'=..·4-~~
......... fr-vwJ'
'OHA\,. ~
Frank W. Neal, P.E.
President/Structural Engineer
FWN/js
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
603 EVANS DRIVE
EULESS, TeXAS 76040
:BLAND 1'. KøUtP£R
ARCHITECT - CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
HOME: 817-571-5132
DAY: 817-571-7848
, ,
May 22, 1991
Jim Browne
Director of Parks and Recreation
City of North Richland Hills
6720 NE Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: Richfield Park
Sports Lighting
On the night of May 20, 1991, we met Jack Giacomarro at Richfield Park to verify the
existing levels of lighting. We took multiple readings on each of the four baseball
fields and two tennis courts. The weather conditions were overcast with little or no
moonligh t.
- Field #1, Bronco, has an outfield depth of approximately 200 feet. We took five light
level readings in the infield and obtained an average light level of 12 footcandles.
We took four readings at the outfield and obtained an average light level of 4
footcandles. The minimum lighting levels recommended by the Illumination
Engineering Standards Handbook are 30 footcandles infield and 20 footcandles
outfield. The lighting at this field is approximately 70% below standard.
Field #2, Pony-Colt, has an outfield depth of approximately 300 feet. We took five
. readings at the infield and obtained an average of 14 footcandles. We took five
readings in the outfield and obtained an average of 5 footcandles. Recommended
lighting levels are 30 footcandles infield and 20 footcandles outfield. Lighting at this
field is approximately 64% below standard.
Field #3, Shetland, currently has an outfield depth of approximately 150 feet. We
were informed during the investigation that the baseball league intends to relocate
the fence to a depth of 185 feet. We took five readings in the infield and obtained an
average of 18 footcandles. We took three readings at the outfield and obtained an
average of 12 footcandles. Recommended levels are 30 footcandles infield and 20
footcandles outfield. Lighting at this field is approximately 40% below standard.
Field #4, Mustang, has 'an outfield depth of approximately 180 feet. We took five
readings in the infield and obtained an average of 17 footcandles. We took three
readings at the outfield and obtained an average of 12 footcandles. Recommended
levels are 30 footcandles infield and 20 footcandles outfield. Lighting at this field is
approximately 42% below standard.
n:£n:8:£:Jt - Ãn$1t'LCr\N 'LNITLTUtt 0"" Ä:JtCH1/J£CTS
n:En:BE:Jt - CONIT:R.UCTWN IP$C1nc.tTLONS 'LNST1,'JUT£
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
1
Jim Browne
City of North Richland Hills
May 22, 1991
Page Two
At the tennis courts we took twelve readings at the west court and fourteen readings
at the east court for an average illumination of 4 footcandles. This average is
approximately 87% below the 30 footcandles recommended for tennis.
In addition to the lighting levels, we noted the height of the existing poles. The
baseball poles at fields #1 and #2 are approximately 40 feet tall. The poles at fields #3
and #4 are approximately 35 feet tall. These poles are too short to allow proper
lighting. The poles at field #1 need to be a combination of 50' and 60' poles. The
poles at field #2 should be a combination of 60' and 70' poles. The poles at fields #3
and #4 should be 60' poles. The taller poles allow proper and even distribution of
lighting over the entire playing field. Taller poles also allow the bottom of the ball
to be illuminated to prevent a high pop-up from being lost in the lack of light.
Taller poles help prevent players from being blinded looking up for the ball.
The poles at the tennis courts are approximately 40 feet tall. These poles are the
- proper height, but they are not sufficient to support enough fixtures to deliver the
recommended level of lighting. As noted above, the tennis lighting is only 13% of
the lighting which should be provided. Stronger poles will be required to support
sufficient fixtures.
As you review this information on the existing lighting, it is important to consider
the speed of a ball after being thrown or hit. As the anticipated speed increases, the
recommended levels of light increase. Recommended lighting levels are calculated
with relationships to speed of the ball for the safety of the players. Averaging the
information presented above, the lighting at Richfield Park is approximately 60%
below the minimum recommendations for the proposed levels of play.
Bland F. Harper, AlA
~~
Architect I Construction Mana
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
II
I
II
,I
, Liqht Level
I Readings were not available for football fields.
courts are currently not lighted.
I
I
I
Ie
I
RICHFIELD PARK SPORTS FACILITY
LIGHT LEVEL ANALYSIS - SUMMARY
FACILITY ACTUAL AVERAGE MINIMUM COMMENTS
LZGHT LEVEL READZNGS STANDARD LEVELS*
(FOOTCANDLES) (FOOTCANDLES)
Infield Outfield Infield Outfield
Field #1 12 4 30 20 Approximately 70
(Bronco) Below Standard
200' Outfield
Field #2 14 5 30 20 Approximately 64
(Pony/Colt) Below Standard
300' Outfield
Field #3 18 12 30 20 Approximately 4C
(Shetland) Below Standard
150' - 185'
Outfield
-
ield #4 17 12 30 20 Approximately 4;
.Mustang) Below Standard
180' Outfield
Tennis Courts 4 30 Approximately 8~
Below Standard
The average existing lighting at .Richfield Park is currently only 60% below tl
minimum recommended standard for proposed levels of play.
T-Ball fields and basketbal
*standard levels as recommended by the Illumination Engineering Standards
Handbook.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Administration
Proposed Use of CDBG Funds for Human
. SUbject: Services Center
Council Meeting Date: 6/10 /91
Agenda Number: GN 91-85
On February 11, 1991 the City Council adopted Resolution 91-06 expressing
support of a proposal to utilize over $200,000 Unspecified Community
Development Block Grant Funds to purchase and remodel a clinic building located
on Brown Trail in Bedford. This proposal was not approved by a majority of
representatives to the Tarrant County Mayors' Council; therefore, an
alternative approach is being pursued.
Each city in Tarrant County is entitled to approximately $8,000 of the $200,000
plus that is available in Unspecified Community Development Block Grant
funding. Accordingly, each city is being requested to commit its $8,000 share
to the Human Services Center Project. Numerous cities throughout the county
have approved a commitment to this approach.
I I
Recommendation:
It is recommended that Mayor Brown be authorized to direct that the North
Richland Hills entitlement of $8,000 be committed to the Human Services Center
Project.
I
,I
II
I
,I
I
I
I
I
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
K~/~
Department Head Signature I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
I Finance Director
I
Page 1 of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tl
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Public Works
.1\pprove Purchase of Rlght-of-Way tor
SUbject: Crane Road Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Council Meeting Date: 6/10/91
Agenda Number: PU 91-1 7
The Council approved Ordinance No. 1734 on May 13, 1991 which levied the assessment for
Crane Road Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project. In the design of this project, an
easement was to be acquired across the front of one property located on the east side
of the street. Crane Road is currently designated as a two-lane collector street (C2U)
on the Master Thoroughfare Plan and will require GO-foot of right-of-way.
Due to the eventual need to acquire additional right-of-way from this property, an
offer was made and accepted by the property owner to sell the City ten feet (10') of
right-of-way. The negotiated price is $1,400.00 equaling $0.84 a square foot.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends Council approve payment of $1,400.00 to Roy J. and Vicki L.
Edwards for street right-of-way from Tract 3B1A, T.K. Martin Survey, A-lOSS.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
, Finance Director
REV
Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
City Manager
Pa e 1 of 1
(( 3 (2 ) \ 1 1 7
I'
Ie
~2 TR. 3
TR.2V ~
1 Ac
B & A. TR. 31<
.5 Ac
~ ~ TR. 3Q
C ~ C ^ 3Z 1.64 Ac
: ~ TR.
D & ~ A TR.3M
~ 2S .5 Ac
u
5 ~ /\ TR.3H
~ .5 Ac
TR.8D. I:\. . ^
1.4 AC~ ~
THREE £ RANCH
^6 1 C 42076)
Q~ 1
<t
~ -..W
W TR.3BIB IAllTII' IIWEI ""EMEITI
~ ASSESSMEIT-ROLL
TR.8C U SHEET ND. 1 DF" 1
2.45 Ac
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
!I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
-
TR.2F'
1.35 Ac
TR.2'J
.6 Ac
~
4~
3Lß
~
2Lß
~Rþ
o
1&
TR.8J ^
lAC~
2
^ TR.3Ql
~ .5 Ac
1
&
SCALEr 1-=200'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
"'''':¿~~):';·':I I te
.
.....
~\ ~ ....
~~p.¡:P¡"t"I
.:. ... ..: ~
. .
'.,I"
PARCEL 1
0.0381 ACRE
SCALE: 1"= 40'
~ov D. E'~WNtP5
'6I~.~ 11:0 .
FT:~, ~ 7'-1ðO
\A::X... '-SS S, pr¡.. ~, Þ.R:r:c:.'T:
a.....
~
~-
UL.
z=
«
~.
U-
.: .. -.:
~:-
16E Eo
.~
. .
. . . .
:
SIŒ10f SHafI~
PIÐPOSm 1'" SAHITARr SDIER FASDBrl'
ADJ1CE2l1' ro CRANE ReAD
~ORTH RICHI,¡\ND HILLS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
-
PROPOSED lØ' SANITARY SEWER EASDŒWr
ALL that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the T.K. Hartin SUrvey-, AbS1:ract
1955, ~rrant ~ounty, Texas and being a portion of that Sëlllllt tract described. to Roy D.
m:!wards as r:P.COrded in yollllle 6555, Page 307, Deed' Records, Tarrant Count:y, Texas and
being more particularly described by tæt:es and bounds as follows:
. .
BmINNI~ at a steel rod at the Northwest corner of said tract, said point being on the
East right-of-way 1 ~ne of Crane Road ( a variable width right-of-way);
THfX:E North 84 degrees 58 minutes sa seconds East with the North boundary line of said
tract, lØ.ß4 feet to a steel ~~;
~.~- . · '" ...~ "" """""~"~'~ "t: -, ~.: ~.,.., ". -., -~~ oÕ<; r.T....... '''. IX!' "~t: "::IS t .., f ''1d Ol! ra 11 e 1 t:) the
West bOundary of said ::ract:, L66.59 feet to a steel rod on the South bounàary line of
said tract;
'lHENCE :;;Jrth .36 degrees ·H mlnutes 11 seconds West with the said South boundary line,
19.91 feet._ to a steel rod at the Southwest corner of said traer, said point being on the..
.said East right-of-way line of Crane Road;
'lHFX:E :~orth (l(J degrees 06 minutes 01 seconds East with said East right-of-way line and .
the West bOunåary line of said tract, 165.15 feet to the place of beqiming and
cont3ini~q Ø.0381 a~~, more or less.
~.f':
U~·~~
o
TYPE -
DAVID c.= MOAK
SUllvrrtJII.i-IN~ -
RE81STEllED ~ PU8LIC..- SURVEYOR
p.o. lOX 1034 -. 2..-2211
I ~ . KUlIS T... r EXAS- f.J
.,ÂTF" - 140 - 'I~ 1~~-ZZ7 -':J:. '!
',~
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
/
CITY OF NOR'l'H RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS
RIGHT-OF-WAY
I
/
STATE OF TEXAS
COUN'l'Y OF TARRANT
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS
That we, Roy D. Edwards and wife.. Vicki L. Edwards , as Sellers, for and in
consideration of the agreed purchase price of One Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($1,400),
and upon all of the terms and conditions hereof, hereby grant, sell and convey to the City
of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation of Tarrant County, Texas as Buyer, a
perpetual right-of-way for the purpose of constructing, improving, widening, maintaining
and using a public street with drainage facilities as may be required and the further
rights to construct, improve, operate and maintain water, sewer, or other public utilities
in, under or upon said right-of-way, as described on the plat attached hereto, which plat
is made a part hereof, and/or described as follows:
(SEE ATTACHED PLAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
The agreed p\1rëhìi~e:príaÈ{t·tñ(:ï:udéš·· fÛll accord, satisfaction and compensation for
all demands of the Seller, subject also to-the fOllowing special conditions, if any:
a .. ~:- ~.;...~... ..1.::-. . .... ...".... .~"."
To have and hold the same perpetually to the City of North Richland Hills and its
successors and assigns forever.
Executed this the '3A.ti day of ~. A.D.. 1991-
~ \.
Vicki L. Edwards
SELLERS
ADDRESS OF GRANTEE:
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North RJ.chland Hills, TX 76180
STATE OF TEXAS
COUN'l'Y· OF Tarrant
This instrument was acknowledged before me on 'J ~&
Roy D.' Edwards and wife.. Vicki L. Edwards.
day of June, 1991 by
....... ~ ....~...... ...~..
NO~~~i! s~~ ~
~ .... Do 8IIAIIuy
~ --- ,...--
~'.- ..._.~~-~~
My Commission Expires:
'-1- 2 2 .. c:r 1
-.¡
Notary1s Printed Name:
f1Q..~f t ð..-arJ(-t.¡