Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC 1991-10-28 Agendas
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 28, 1991 - 6:15 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I 1. Presentation by Mike Fritz and Nancy Kirkland - Re: Teen Court (15 Minutes) 2. IR 91-140 FM 1938 (Davis Boulevard) and Starnes Road Signalization (10 Minutes) 3. IR 91-139 Scheduling of Meeting Rooms - Pre Council, Council Chamber, Conference Room (5 Minutes) 4. GN 91-97 Consideration of an Amendment to Subdivision Ordinance No. 1579 Requiring Masonry Screening Walls Along Major Thoroughfares - Ordinance No. 1750 (Agenda Item No. 15) (5 Minutes) 5. GN 91-150 State Funding for NETS (Agenda Item No. 17) (5 Minutes) 6. PW 91-32 Streets to be Resurfaced under the 1992 County Program (Agenda Item No. 20) (5 Minutes) 7. Other Items 8. Work Session · I Page 2 I I I I I NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN I 9. *Executive Session (10 Minutes) a. Personnel I b. Briefing on Pending Litigation c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition I 110. I Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. I I I *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is I contemplated, it will be taken in open session. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CI1Y COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 28, 1991 For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/ or action. I NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN I 1. Call to Order I 2. Invocation I 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting October 14, 1991 5. Presentations by Boards & Commissions None 6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 7. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19,20,21, 22, & 23) 8. Presentation of "Yard of the Month" Awards for the Month of October 9. Presentation of "Landscape of the Month" Award for the Month of October I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I 10. PZ 91-21 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Herman J. Smith to Rezone Lot 3 and Lots 5 through 13, Block A, Lots 6 through 11, Block C, Richland Oaks Addition, from R-1 Single Family Residential and C-l Commercial to C-2 Commercial (Located on the east side of Oakridge Terrace and north of Airport Freeway) I 11. I Ordinance No. 1771 I I * 12. PS 91-17 Request of Volkman's Inc. for Replat of Lots 2R-IR through 18R-IR, Block 26, and Lots 4R-1R through 7R-1R, Block 33, Holiday West Addition, Section 10 (Located on Cancun Drive and Buenos Aires Drive) *13. PS 91-18 Request of Star Enterprise for Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Calloway Addition (Located at the Southeast corner of Grapevine Highway and Northeast Loop 820 Service Road) *14. PS 91-21 Request of Brookes Baker Surveyors for corrected Final Plat of Steeple Ridge Addition (Located west of Davis Boulevard and north of Shady Grove Road) 15. GN 91-97 Consideration of an amendment to Subdivision Ordinance No. 1579 Requiring Masonry Screening Walls Along Major Thoroughfares - Ordinance No. 1750 I *16. GN 91-149 I Property Tax Refund I I * 17. GN 91-150 State Funding for NETS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I *18. PU 91-38 Glenview Drive Sanitary Sewer Project - Easement Acquisition - Parcel No.4 *19. PU 91-39 Glenview Drive Sanitary Sewer Project - Easement Acquisition - Parcel No.5 *20. PW 91-32 Streets to be Resurfaced under the 1992 County Program *21. PW 91-33 Award of Bid on Rufe Snow Drive Synchronizated Signal Systems *22. PAY 91-16 Approve Final Pay Estimate No.2 of $12,348.67 for Crane Road Sewer Improvements *23. PAY 91-17 Approve Final Pay Estimate No.2 of $30,428.37 for Valley Park Estates Sanitary Sewer Improvements 24. Citizens Presentation I 25. I Adjournment I I POSTED / () / c2 ¿¿ill Date d. -do pm Time r City Secretary ::";7? Æ '." (.'._-- I Í /~~ ~^A. . /:'~. - '. ~~/'\..-- c.____~_"'......_._..._ ...........-..r: ~~...}II~-- I Ie I I I I I I I ft I I I I I I Ie I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 91-142 Date: October 24, 1991 Subject: Mobile Video Systems for Police Units At the initiative of Attorney for the City, Rex McEntire, the Mayor and City Council recently expressed interest in the mobile video system concept that would enhance our position pertaining to our exposure to police liability issues. In furtherance of your interest, we have contacted several vendors who have agreed to install their equipment in some of our marked patrol fleet for the purpose of conducting a sixty day study as to the worthiness and durabi 1 i ty of such equi pment. The -proposed study wi 11 begi n wi thi n the next thirty days. The equipment to be installed includes video recorders and wireless microphone systems all contacts with the public. If approved by the Mayor and City Council, upon completion of a successful test phase, we would anticipate the issuance of a "Request for Proposal" to be sent to those vendors matchi ng whatever speci fi cat ions are deri ved at based on information gathered from the test phase. cameras, monitors, VHS integrated to document Once a "Request for Proposal" is answered, we will have the dollar figures in hand to present to the Ci ty Manager for further revi ew by the Ci ty Staff, Mayor and City Council. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I -, I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IR 91-143 No. Date: October 22, 1991 Subject: September 1991 Revenue and Expenditure Reports Attached for your review are revenue and expenditure reports for fiscal year end September 30, 1991. Some adjustments have been made to show a valid comparison of actual revenues and expenditures for fiscal year 1990/91. Previous monthly financials have shown all appropriations of general fund reserves (i.e. 1989/90 encumbrances, funding for Richfield Park Light System, and the Bomb Disposal Suit. With these adjustments eliminated from the financials, the reporting amounts for actual revenues and expenditures can be compared more precisely to the respective adopted budgets. The 1990/91 actual revenues total $13,659,716 compared to expenditures of $13,622,423. The net addition to the general fund reserves is $37,293. This amount may change as a result of the annual audit currently in progress. If needed, we will be happy to give a more comprehensive explanation of the adjustments made to the general fund revenue and expenditure reports. Utility Fund Revenues - Total revenues collected for the year amounted to $13,678,456 or 91.23% of the revised budget. utility Fund Expenditures - utility Fund expenditures were $13,798,685 or approximately $120,000 above revenues. The audit adjustments for water and sewer sales will eliminate what appears to be a deficit situation. Management Services Fund - Total revenues include charges to the General and Utility Funds and other miscellaneous revenues. The total revenue for the year amounted to $1,797,832. Total expenditures for 1990/91 amounted to $1,666,334. This does not include depreciation expense to be charged as an adjustment during the year end audit. Park and Library Fund - Total revenues for 1990/91 amounted to $166,067 compared to the budget of $162,074. Total expenditures amounted to $128,164 compared to the budget of $162,074. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I -, I I Self Insurance Fund - The Summary of Operations report for fiscal year 1990/91 is included for your review. The total revenue available for the fund was $2,054,062. The total expenditures including $165,000 for incurred claims not paid in September are $2,023,655. The net addition to fund balance is estimated to be $30,407. This amount may change as a result of year end accruals and audit adjustments. Promotional Fund - Total revenues of $171,541 are less than budgeted revenues by approximately $8,800 or 95.1% of the adopted budget for 1990/91. Total expenditures are only 83.6% ($150,853) of the adopted budget for 1990/91. Respectfully submitted. ----£it 7'r/C4~V~ Lee Maness Director of Finance I Ie I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I GENERAL FUND REVENUE FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 I /------------------FISCAL YEAR 1990-91---------------/ /---------FISCAL YEAR 1989-90---- ADOPTED PROJECTED COLLECTED % ACTUAL COLLECTED BUDGET ACTUAL AS OF 9/91 BUDGET COLLECTIONS AS OF 9/90 ACTL ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------------ I TAXES Current Property Taxes $3,604,451 $3,668,767 $3,697,890 102.59% $3,422,455 $3,422,455 1C I Delinquent Property Taxes 148,675 169,075 175,814 118.25% 97,464 97,464 1C Penalty and Interest 108,295 108,295 97, 174 89 . 73% 96,679 96,679 , C Franchise Taxes 1,672,040 1,584,040 1,576,069 94.26% 1,545,460 1,545,460 1 C Utility Fund Franchise Taxes 234,000 234,000 241,825 103.34% 275,643 275,643 1 C I Sales Taxes 4,342,418 4,223,988 4,208,330 96.91% 4, 130, 102 4,130,102 1 C Mixed Beverages 70,000 70,000 84,826 121.18% 67,698 67,698 1 C Tax Searches 1 , 600 1 , 600 1 , 054 65.88% 1 , 698 1 , 698 1C I Payment in Lieu of Taxes 119 , 628 128,355 128,355 107.30% 108,753 108,753 1C ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------------ TOTAL TAXES 10,301,107 1 0, 188, 120 10,211,337 99. 13% 9,745,952 9,745,952 10 f' FINES AND FORFEITURES Municipal Court Fines 317,600 301,235 303,524 95 . 57% 317,710 317,710 10 I Library Fines 66,000 42,250 37,930 57.4r" 29,375 29 , 375 10 Warrant & Arrest Fees 67,200 67,200 66, 73 2 99.30% 59,705 59,705 10 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------------ I TOTAL FINES AND FORFEITURES 450,800 410,685 408, 186 90.55% 406,790 406,790 10 I LICENSES AND PERMITS Miscellaneous Permits 132,906 125,750 120,286 90.50% 122,490 122,490 10 Building Permits 319,257 278,500 270,372 84.69% 364,029 364,029 10 Electrical Permits 75,000 68,200 51,304 68.41% 66,286 66,286 10 I Plunbing Permits 25,000 29,450 26,210 104.84% 27,219 27,219 10' Curb & Drainage Permits 10,000 34,600 41,293 412.93% 27,663 27,663 10 Re-Inspection Fees 3,900 1,450 1 ,660 42.56% 2,650 2,650 10 I License Renewal Fees 12,000 12,365 8,469 70.58% 9, 103 9 , 1 03 101 Contractor Registration Fees 42,000 37, 750 39,315 93.61% 48,453 48,453 10, Animal License Fees 4,500 6, 180 6,412 142.49% 5,579 5,579 10; I Animal Control I mpounånent 20,000 20,575 19,565 97.83% 16, 190 16, 190 lOr Auto Impounånent Fees 78,276 74,500 76,455 97.67"1. 77,009 77,009 101 Food Service Permits 43,000 44,605 61,761 143.63% 35,203 35,203 1 oc Food Managers School 7,500 7,500 7,915 105.53% 6,346 6,346 10f -, Fire Dept Certification Fees 10,700 15,830 6,595 61.64% 6,563 6,563 10l Fire Inspection Fees 20,000 820 990 4.95% 0 0 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------------. I TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS 804,039 758,075 738,602 91 .86% 814,783 814,783 lOt I I ~ I I I I I I I It I I I I I I II I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GENERAL FUND REVENUE FOR THE TYELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 /-----------------FISCAL YEAR 1990-91----------------/ /----------FISCAL YEAR 1989-90----- ADOPTED PROJECTED COLLECTED % ACTUAL COLLECTED % BUDGET ACTUAL AS OF 9/91 BUDGET COLLECTIONS AS OF 9/90 ACTUJ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------------- CHARGES FOR SERVICE Park Facility Rental 5,000 5,000 5,963 119. 26% 5,756 5, 756 10C Ambulance Fees 100,360 145,360 118,692 118 . 2 T''' 74,006 74,006 1 OC Garbage Billing 170,800 170,800 174,713 102.29% 144,014 144,014 10C Maps & Codes 2,000 2,000 1, 184 59.20% 1 ,581 1,581 10C Recreation Revenue 145,000 163,432 186,922 128.91% 150,061 150,061 10C, Athletic Revenue 57,375 65,980 72,716 126.74% 52,711 52,711 10C Planning & Zoning Fees 13,650 13,650 10,093 ì3 .94% 13,512 13,512 10C Sale of Accident Reports 15,619 15,619 16,688 106.84% 16,285 16,285 10C Vital Statistics 17,000 17,000 15,442 90.84% 1 7 , 288 17,288 10C Mowing 32,000 37,625 39,967 124.90% 39,048 39,048 10C Detention Services 50,000 50,000 70,353 140.71% 128,788 128,788 10C Non-resident Library Fees 9,000 11,200 13,473 149.70% 13, 745 13,745 10C Citicable 500 12,500 14,043 2808.60% 2,613 2,613 10C ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------------- TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE 618,304 710, 166 740,249 119. 72% 659,408 659,408 10C INTERGOVERNMENTAL Admin Fee - General CIP Admin Fee - Utility Fund 210,000 $210,000 $210,000 100.00% $210,000 $210,000 10C 990,000 990,000 990,000 100.00% 735 , 000 735,000 100 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------------- 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 100.00% 945,000 945,000 10C TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL MISCELLANEOUS Interest Income Sale of City Property Other Income Appropriation of Fund Balance 475 ,000 344,657 308,042 64.85% 457,581 457,581 100 19,000 19,000 800 4.21% 1 , 725 1 , 725 100 49,900 49,900 28,664 57.44% 36,064 36,064 100 23,836 484,074 484,074 2030.85% 0 0 0 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------------- 567, 736 897,631 821,580 144.71% 495,370 495,370 100 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------------- TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL GENERAL FUND $13,941,986 $14,164,677 $14,119,954 100 101.28% $13,067,303 $13,067,303 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ --- Less appropriation of Fund Balance 1. 1989/90 Encumbrances 2. Richfield Park Lighting 3. Bomb Disposal Suit (224,338) (218,900) ( 17 ,000) ------------ ACTUAL 1990/91 REVENUES $13,659,716 ============ I '- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES I FOR THE T~ELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTMBER 30, 1991 /----------FISCAL YEAR 1990-91---------/ /----------FISCAL YEAR 1989-90---------/ REVISED EXPENDITURES % TOTAL EXPENDITURES % OF TOTAL I BUDGET AS OF 9/91 BUDGET EXPENDITURES AS OF 9/90 EXPENDITURES ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ DEPARTMENT: I CITY COUNCIL $78,985 $68,941 87.28% $34,056 $34,056 100.00% I CITY MANAGER 294,638 296,647 100.68% 278,278 278,278 100.00% CITY SECRETARY 227,540 213,543 93.85% 196,119 196, 11 9 100.00% I LEGAL 90,089 90,415 100.36% 83, 167 83, 167 100.00% CIVIL SERVICE 29,905 29,464 98.53% 31 , 072 31,072 100.00% I FINANCE 468,430 431,511 92.12% 444,948 444,948 100.00% BUDGET 177,457 164,858 92.90% 144,555 144,555 100.00% I PLANNING & ZONING 0 0 0.00% 93, 1 09 93, 1 09 100.00% MANAGEMENT INFO SERVICES 278,890 291,386 104.48% 261,771 261,771 100.00% " MUNICIPAL COURT 406,201 371 ,987 91.58% 339,839 339,839 100.00% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 511,298 487,963 95.44% 397,964 397,964 100.00% I LIBRARY 717,424 704,794 98.24% 607,307 607,307 100.00% I ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 331,625 330,752 99.74% 274, 175 274, 175 100.00% PUBLIC ~ORKS 1,418,858 1,365,487 96.24% 1 ,262,932 1,262,932 100.00% I PARKS & RECREATION 950,941 961,830 101.15% 838,954 838,954 100.00% POLICE 4,277,774 4,195,089 98.07X 3,935,109 3,935,109 100.00% I FIRE 3,087,903 3,035,552 98.30X 2,752,520 2,752,520 100.00% NON-DEPARTMENTAL 1,099,266 1,042,442 94.83% 778,789 778,789 100.00% I LINE ITEM REDUCTION (246,000) 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ TOTAL 514,201,224 $14,082,661 99.17X $12,754,664 $12,754,664 100.00% I ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ......---------- ------------ ------------ LESS : 1 . 1989/90 Encumbrances (224,338) (224,338) 2. Richfield Park Lights (218,900) (218,900) If 3. Bomb Disposal Suit ( 17 ,000) ( 17 , 000 ) 4. Ambulance Revenue (45,000) 5. line-item reduction 246,000 ------------ ------------ I $13,941,986 $13,622,423 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ I I ~ I I I I I I I " I I I I I I If I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS UTILITY FUND REVENUE FOR THE T~ELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 /----------FISCAL YEAR 1990-91---------/ REVISED COLLECTED % BUDGET AS OF 9/91 BUDGET ------------ WATER Water Sales Servlce Charges W'ater Taps Developer Fees Pro-Rata Water ~ater Well Revenue M1scellaneous $8,394,845 102,055 91 ,400 9,200 o 37,500 12,250 ------------ TOTAL WATER 8,647,250 SEWER Sewer Sales Sewer Taps Sewer Transportat1on Developer Fees Pro-Rata Sewer Sewer Access Fees-NRH 5,514,106 34, 170 13,104 7,250 o o ------------ TOTAL SEWER 5,568,630 ------------ ------------ /----------FISCAL YEAR 1989-90---------/ ACTUAL COLLECTED Yo COLLECTIONS AS OF 9/90 ACTUAL ------------ ~8,080,028 76,626 133,471 6, 1 03 11 , 4 77 20,789 22,399 ------------ 8,350,893 5,319,485 45,700 7,657 9,065 3,969 32,450 ------------ 5,418,326 ------------ ------------ ~7, 737,685 80 , 773 66,672 '1,811 , ,953 <20,789) 25,880 92.17% 79. 15% 72.95% 128.38% 0.00% -55.44% 211 .27''' £8,080,028 76,626 133,471 6, 1 03 1 1 , 477 20,789 22,399 100. OOi~ 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ 7,903,985 91.40% 8,350,893 100.00% 5,245,021 20,105 13,210 20,065 2,341 1 , 4 78 95.12% 58.84% 100.81% 276.76% 0.00% 0.00% 5,319,485 45,700 7,657 9,065 3,969 32,450 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ 5,302,220 95.22% 5,418,326 100.00% MISCELLANEOUS Interest Income 670,230 449,651 67.09X 531,367 531,367 100.00X Sale of City Property 5,000 0 O.OOX (30,643) (30,643) 100.00% Interfund Loans 80,000 0 O.OOX 80,000 80,000 O.OOX Appropr1at10n of Ret81ned Earnings 22,600 22,600 100.00X 0 0 O.OOx ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 771,830 472,251 60.71% 580,725 580,724 100.00% ------------ ------------ ------------ -.---------- ------------ ------------ TOTAL UTILITY FUND $14,993,710 $13,678,456 91.23% $14,349,944 $14,349,943 100.00% ============ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ============ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ I ~ I I I I I DEPARTMENT: I CITY MANAGER BUDGET I UTILITY PUBLIC \JORKS - UTILITY BILLING elP PERSONNEL I NON-DEPARTMENTAL I TOTAL UTILITY FUND I I I I -. ¡ I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS UTILITY FUND EXPENSES FOR THE T\JELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 /----------FISCAL YEAR 1990-91---------/ /----------FISCAL YEAR 1989-90---------/ REVI SED EXPEND I TURES ~~ TOT AL EXPEND I TURES ~~ OF TOTAL BUDGET AS OF 9/91 BUDGET EXPENDITURES AS OF 9/90 EXPENDITURES ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ $47,544 $43,865 92.26% $44,756 $44,756 100.00% 99,971 88,390 88.42% 100,713 100,713 100.00% 12,371,659 12,159,261 98.28% 11,574,551 11,574,551 100.00% 946,938 980,217 103.51% 911,249 911,249 100.00% 129,979 128,544 98.90% 170,915 170,915 100.00% 1 , 447, 61 9 398,408 27.52% 362,350 362,350 100.00% ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ $15,043,710 $13,798,685 91 . 72% $13,164,534 $13,164,534 100.00% ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ I ~ I I I I I I I " I I I I I I ~ I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MANAGEMENT SERVICES FUND REVENUE FOR THE T~ELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 /-----------FISCAL YEAR 1990-91----------/ REVISED COLLECTED % BUDGET AS OF 9/91 BUDGET /-----------FISCAL YEAR 1989-90---------- ACTUAL COLLECTED % COLLECTIONS AS OF 9/90 ACTUAL ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- CHARGES TO USER FUNDS FOR: Building Maintenance $758,023 $758,023 100.00% $688,778 $688,778 100.00 Vehicle Maintenance 1,001,927 1,001,556 99.96% 713,887 713,887 100.00 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- TOTAL CHARGES TO USERS 1,759,950 1 , 759 , 579 99.98% 1,402,665 1,402,665 100.00 MISCELLANEOUS Interest Income 60,000 6,660 11.10% 32, 137 32, 137 1 00 . OO~ Sale of City Property 0 30, 168 O.OOx 25,861 25,861 100.00: Other Income 0 1 ,425 0.00% 172 172 100.00: ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------_. TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 60,000 38,253 63.76% 58, 170 58, 170 1 00 . OO~ OPERATING TRANSFERS Transfers from General Fund 0 0 O.OOx 25,646 25,646 1 00 . OO~ Transfers from Utility Fund 0 0 o.oox 2,390 2,390 1 00 . OO~ Appropriation of Fund Balance 175,600 0 O.OOx 0 0 1 00 . OO~ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ 175,600 0 O.OOx 28,036 28,036 , 00 . oo~< ------------ ---~-------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ TOTAL MGMT SERVICES $1,995,550 $1,797,832 90.09X $1,488,871 $1,488,871 1 00 . OO~ ------------ ------------ ============ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ I '- I I I I I DEPARTMENT: I ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE I VEHICLE MAINTENANCE It TOTAL MGMT SERVICES FUND I I I I I I -. I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MANAGEMENT SERVICES FUND EXPENSES FOR THE TUELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 /----------FISCAL YEAR 1990-91---------/ /----------FISCAL YEAR 1989-90---------/ REVISED EXPENDITURES % TOTAL EXPENDITURES % OF TOTAL BUDGET AS OF 9/91 BUDGET EXPENDITURES AS OF 9/90 EXPENDITURES ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ $172,817 $161,861 93.66% $175,350 £175,350 100.00% 717,896 623,363 86.83% 774,388 774,388 100.00% 1 , 1 04 , 837 881,110 79 . 75 % 793,999 793,999 100.00% -------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ $1,995,550 $1,666,334 83.50% $1,743,737 $1,743,737 100.00% --~----------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ -------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ I ~ I I I I I I I fj I I I I I I ~ I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PARK & LIBRARY FUND REVENUE FOR THE T~ElVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 /----------FISCAL YEAR 1990-91---------/ /----------FISCAL YEAR 1989-90---------1 REVISED COLLECTED % ACTUAL COLLECTED % BUDGET AS OF 9/91 BUDGET COLLECTIONS AS OF 9/90 ACTUAL ------------ --------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Contributions $93,000 ~97, 573 104.92% $100,331 $100,331 100.00% Interest Income 9,000 6,919 76.88% 9,347 9,347 100.00% Other 17,500 19,001 108.58% 1 , 904 1 , 904 100.01% Transfer from General Fund 0 0 0.00% 8,400 8,400 100.00% Appropriation of Fund Balance 42,574 42,574 100.00% 0 0 0.00% ------------ --------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ TOTAL PARK & LIBRARY FUND $162,074 $166,067 102.46% $119,982 $119,982 100.00% ------------ --------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ --------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ !I '- I I I I I I I - I I I I I I lit I I CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS PARK & LIBRARY FUND EXPENDITURES FOR THE TE~LVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 /----------FISCAl YEAR 1990-91---------/ REVISED EXPENSES % BUDGET AS OF 9/91 BUDGET /----------FISCAl YEAR 1989-90---------/ TOTAL EXPENDITURES % OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES AS OF 9/90 EXPENDITURES ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ DEPARTMENT: PARKS $89,047 $59,947 67.32% $92,176 $92,176 100.00% LIBRARY 68,500 63,684 92.9;010 48,041 48,041 100.00% BEAUTIFICATION 4,527 4,533 O.OOX 8,013 8,013 100.00% .----------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ TOTAL PARK & LIBRARY FUND $162,074 $148,230 100.00% $ 1 28, , 64 79.08X $148,230 -----~------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ I ~ I I I I I I I " I I I I I I -. I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS INSURANCE FUND SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS 10/1/90 TO 9/30/91 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HEALTH INSURANCE EMPLOYEE DEPENDENT I,J/C GEN LIAS INTEREST INCOME REVENUE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL ------------- Genera l Fund Utility Fund ·~anagement Servi ces TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES ------------- GeneraL Fund Utility Fund Management Services TOTAL EXPENSES $854,741 244,750 52,500 --------------- $ 1 , , 5 1 , 991 --------------- --------------- $438,925 107,772 45,957 --------------- $592,654 --------------- --------------- I I $187,309 I 1 43,135 I I 14,614 ¡ --------------1 $245,057 I ==============1 $808,888 1 63, 1 70 80,454 --------------t $1,052,512 I ==============1 I I I I $203,800 I $130,978 I I I 153,650 I 16,950 , I I 13,000 I 24,000 , ------------1 ------------1 $370,450 I $171,928 I ============1 ============1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I $115,802 I $17,449 I I I 55,364 I 10,783 I I I 14,092 I 0 I ------------1 ------------1 $185,258 I $28,231 I ============1 ============1 Anticipated accrual of claims not paid at September 30, 1991 TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS I I $83, 188 I I 25,625 I I 5,823 I ------------1 $114,636 I ============1 I I $1,460,016 I I 484,110 I I 109,936 I -------------- ¡ $2,054,062 I ==============1 $1,381,064 337,088 1 140,503 I I --------------t I $1,858,655 I ============1 ==============1 $165,000 -------------- $2,023,655 ============== I ~ I I I I I I I " I I I I I I ~ I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PROMOTIONAL FUND REVENUE FOR THE T~ELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 /----------FISCAL YEAR 1990-91---------/ ADOPTED COLLECTED % BUDGET AS OF 9/91 BUDGET /----------FISCAL YEAR 1989-90---------/ ACTUAL COLLECTED % COLLECTIONS AS OF 9/90 ACTUAL ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Occucancy Taxes $110,000 $103,094 93.72% $127,888 $127,888 100.00% Interest Income 10,000 8,045 80.45% 10,257 1 0 , 257 100.00% Transfer from General Fund 35,000 35,000 100.00% 35,000 35,000 100.00% Appropriation of Fund Balance 25,402 25,402 100.00% 0 0 0.00% ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ TOTAL PROMOTIONAL FUND $180,402 $171,541 95.09% $173,145 $173,145 100.00% -------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ I ~ I I I I I I I - I I I I I I ~ I I CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS PROMOTIONAL FUND EXPENSES FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1991 /----------FISCAL YEAR 1990-91---------/ ADOPTED EXPENSES % BUDGET AS OF 9/91 BUDGET ------------ ------------ ------------ DEPARTMENT: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $180,402 $150,853 83.62% ------------ ------------ ------------ TOTAL PROMOTIONAL FUND $180,402 $150,853 83.62% ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ /----------FISCAL YEAR 1989-90---------/ TOTAL EXPENDITURES % OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES AS OF 9/90 EXPENDITURES ------------ ------------ ------------ $132,226 $132,226 100.00% ------------ ------------ ------------ $132,226 $132,226 100.00% ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I INFORMAL REPORTTO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 91-140 Date: October 28, 1991 Subject: FM 1938 (Davis Boulevard) and starnes Road Signalization Attached you will find a copy of a petition requesting the signalization of FM 1938 (Davis Boulevard) and starnes Road. The Public Works Department has been in contact with the Texas Department of Transportation (TOoT) since September 21, 1989. In December 1989, the TOoT agreed the intersection warranted a signal. The signal is to be installed with the second phase of the FM 1938 construction. In November 1990, the City Council passed Resolution No. 90-51 requesting the state install temporary signals at this location. Due to budget reductions, the TOoT is proposing a January 1993 bid date for the project. The letting date means the signals could be in place by May 1994. In a recent telephone conversation with TOoT the Public Works staff explored the possibility of constructing temporary signals at the subject intersection. The TOoT is supportive to constructing temporary signals however, do not have funds to participate in the cost. The City would have to bear all expenses to install the temporary signal. After the signals are in place, the state will maintain the signals and pay for the electricity. When the permanent signal installation at the subject intersection is complete, the original temporary equipment will be returned to the City. The staff has prepared two estimates to install the temporary signals at the intersection of FM 1938 and starnes Road. The first cost estimate of $29,800 incorporates all new equipment. The second estimate of $24,800 anticipates reuse of equipment salvaged from the Rufe Snow Drive Synchronization Project. The salvaged equipment from the Rufe Snow Project may not be available for approximately 6 weeks. Although funds are not now available for this project, drawdown funds from interest and assessments will be available during the second quarter of fiscal year 1991-92. '1 ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER N()~TH ~'CHLAND HIt..LS, TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I September 8, 1991 To The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: As home owners in the Stonybrook neighborhood we do hereby petition the mayor and city council to review the immediate need for a traffic signal at the Davis-Starnes\Rumfield intersection. At the present time this signal is in the letting process and has a tentative installation date of September, 1992. We have already contacted North Richland Hills officials, the State Highway Department, and the office of State Senator Chris Harris regarding this matter. We all feel that the traffic con- ditions at this intersection are too hazardous to wait another year. Nam Respectfully, The Undersigned Address /-?¿j-/¿ g£~}{J/'r/;>,,~ Y~/J/ . /J h / Add res s X {./¡ ,.)-·,/;}i¿.~LÞ(~~~ Addressp;- ~~;¿,~v ci Address 71 :1("1 !3rc'(icJzctv'CJ? if Address //.2 I /?'ó..uJ::I;·<;~/v>} c;t- Address v71/ '7 &-u..~--1dJ-.A.X:A,'- U- Address 7//3 ~æt!tðd/¿/1 C!-f- Address 7113 &{)ù/(/L"t.-v~~ C!.-.r Address rt-l~ &~~/Jð~ 1/2 Nam~ . . Address -gC¡O(f ¡;.1.o0K../t/JVUH:Df!.., (!-/~nCt L ~ C.J:..E/~ ð40ð /ðtY:iJklrlJ£n ä_r. ,PI¿1..¿~c\.ft//¿;/U¿ ~j/Z ¿ÓCC(;J/1Z~ Please return this petition and direct any c~mmunication to: Karen Clary, ~~17 Northfield Dr. 76180 - (656-4217) by Sept. 2_! e-": '=-.. '" -2,l-' ~.'?- <2 S" I Z Roc.. /c~Jd7-¿- Name /~ /~ rJ14'vn_ " . ]// -"" ~/' oJ·- Name / ¿',l.~ /~~ -..,1 ~ -- Name \111 ~ G.. :-l'7-t:f~~. fd / I Name c/< . .~:f'~iy-il~-- vÎ- / ; . './ I) N am e ~_ Name Name Name J~ I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I September 8, 1991 To The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: As home owners in the Stonybrook neighborhood we do hereby petition the mayor and city council to review the immediate need for a traffic signal at the Davis-Starnes\Rumfield intersection. At the present time this signal is in the letting process and has a tentative installation date of September, 1992. We have already contacted North Richland Hills officials, the State Highway Department, and the office of State Senator Chris Harris regarding this matter. We all feel that the traffic con- ditions at this intersection are too hazardous to wait another year. Respectfully, The Undersigned Name m d/i.LA ~~ , /\ I !-A~_¡!'~/~L, ) '-.i; Addr ess 7ft /31Ú~1^-f Æ ¡; r -Iy . . ' ' I Addr es s ;J,'Í 0 i;', AioJtL'~--ÂLL(..rk.-0 (·t. t I Name Address CZL(l" \ ~{lc:rvJ\2rc0k Ci: ~ . <"'Jc .. ~ ,', /,. ~.JJ ('~ L ì). L' /.r{' i } /\.'. .,,) / {,' (, ( --, 1 () , ~/ ..<3/,.-, ~" 6.,C',C'k c¿ Ÿ-ð íj ;(..1;/;/./ :17 Þt1Î()/{ F g::Vð/' S>-/WC'¡;'<-", k / ../ Name, "\ )/ l I Address I ( '-:-X/ /1 N am e "¿:~1?/~({ -/ - ~ Name UL'lb\ r'(yit_ ..--_#---:/ /'J ~., , N am e ,.- é'- r / ¿:';"'"1' (' w?,........~~rl<·1 Name _{~~ J'JtÌ¿fi¿'{ I'" { \ -- (Á'// Na;ne-----;;m ,Cj, ~ Name /J Address Address ct c-r- C- Address Address Address Name Address Please return this petition and direct any communication to: Karen Clary, 7617 Northfield Dr. 76180 - (656-4217) by Sept. 2'! ~ I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I {. )~/'.~'1. " ........._._1 _. r .., ,." - \j September 8, 1991 To The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: As home owners in the Crestwood neighborhood we do hereby petition the mayor and city council to review the immediate need for a traffic signal at the Davis-Starnes\Rumfield intersection. At the present time this signal is in the letting process and has a tentative installation date of September, 1992. We have already contacted North Richland Hills officials, the State Highway Department, and the office of State Senator Chris Harris regarding this matter. We all feel that the traffic con- ditions at this intersection are too hazardous to wait another year. Respectfully, The Undersigned ~~6/~ /1) J{I ùL ::::~:J~- .. '/I/)A. J N am e £A}ljV Name ~ Name e.t,v~Q ~ Name Address Address Address Address Address Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address 7 tJ¡)2 rlf}/¡~ ~ ;::('ZYY 6-~ ~. 'I " r {( . . - ,I '-r J 141-1 JrO/lJLe4i- ~ 7'16B íir11hf~h, JI Of < ~ '-f.iLf fðq'(Rçst k Please return this petition and direct any communication to: Karen Clary, 7617 Northfield Dr. 76180 - (656-4217) by Sept. 23! f ;C 3 I 'Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I September 8, 1991 To The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: As home owners we do hereby petition the mayor and city council to review the immediate need for a traffic signal at the Davis- Starnes\Rumfield intersection. At the present time this signal is in the letting process and has a tentative installation date of September 1992. We have already contacted North Richland Hills officials, the State Highway Department, and the office of State Senator Chris Harris regarding this matter. We all feel that the traffic con- ditions at this intersection are too hazardous to wait another year. v/ . f ¡ ø Name r .*.1., ) (, A-- 1\/ t . ¡/ /) d . , / N am e " ..r-~,", ( ¡'j ...1-.,./1 /" \.... ,/ // / Please retu~th~s petition and direct Karen Clar9, 7617 Northfield Dr. 76180 Name ru~0~ , N a01e \--- ~,"-,/ N ~ ~ ~ \-A~·'-1C:AVL l am e ~- ;LA... l // /J' Name .~/~/ ~d/J~ Name Nam Respectfully, The Undersigned Address r;z - ~ i::.-, I _ o' !5-'t'~~ /_. <~ í1 f S ,;?, .' L II::r ll? Q, S 2- \ fžiÞ ~~~ .c-~ - ,( J -2'; ¿;) ¿d -!~ / 1\)£ }-J '/ tc / (fL ,AJ£/f 7'11 PÒ Address ~'<L~\ )(0\8(:) '). I..M! /-/ )0 /~-'Ú Address ?C:>/.:? lVo-<:t¥~J_jJ 14 ;v;ej. Address 7~(-¿ Æ,.b4rt-f(:6Lù A./Æ/l 7~/ft Addr'ess 7b .7.6ifd ¡Q" . t.)~» 7 t I. /-; )) ¡} i I 1'/ ,1 Add res 51 (; / // (y. IL".(.V/ ¡;( I ~ /V<.: J/7~'íl5)-,û Address Address Address / ' I ..,' / any communication to: - (656-4217) by Sept. 23! ) --.-./" ~ I Ie I 'I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I September 8, 1991 To The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: As home owners in the Meadowview neigllborhood we do hereby petition the mayor and ci ty counci 1 to review tile ilnnleliiate Ileed for a traffic signal at the Davis-Starnes\Rumfield intersection. At the present t i met his s i g n a 1 i sin the 1 e t tin g pro c e s san d 11 a sat en tat i v e installation date of September, 1992. We have already contacted North Richland flills officials, the State Highway Department, and the office of State Senator Chris Harris regarding this matter. We all feel that the traffic con- ditions at this intersection are too hazardous to wait anotller year. Respectfully, The Undersigned Address ~ I' I Î T.( /\.J\ß-.ti) b /Î ~ ~ <3'0/ 3 I?/)/ L-<-f~· ,C), ~ [? { ~ '1ß./trIJß-1 ¡~~ ............. Address Address Address ( ( ~t"'S. ~ \ '.~A",t' ¡YI. ~ C çT -Ut.\...L c.J; L. ''1. ) '^' f.: r\ f(oJ J j,}(}t duj}j) Jf. I , Name Address Address Name ) ') Address Addr es s i' ¿'-2~::' ~, LA.LLt I}u i(j~ Address 1faìD-J)),ßi~ W. I. ~ ,.J Address 21 /J '/)~, Ì'>, è .'.' "~;r~ '~'¡' 9)Ù¡ \U Z~oí ·Jc-k..l-~J~ Please return t is petition ~nd direct any communication to: K are n C 1 ar y, 7 6 1;(4 Nor t h f i e li1. Dr. 7 6 1 8 0 - (6 5 6 - 4 2 1 7) by S e p t. 2 3 ! o Jfhf;~ ?):J~, (?~'J' dV:/vL ;/l2fG Þ¡ 1\.[:) lUA,X- ~ <J62~ õ<~{A. ;J.£.~JÞ¡fž ~~ ~:;t0~ i~DÇ~~j/ 2~~ AJt~~·~ qG ~- ~ '- '- 'ì YI . ----It <-<:. '~Q'~ cD.....~ <-- J '~~ ' __"PA^-J r ~ 8'7 I (0 ~--IJ<ß-ÆJ~~.. ( -f1'fJ--:-J...1, .~~ ~1". ~ ..g7/6 ~&. 7!Jbl:Je; ¿;; {"C r (" '," ' I, .;z?(;) /' ./ . /~-:'7 - Nam - I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I September 8, 1991 To The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: As home owners we do hereby petition the mayor and city council to review the immediate need for a traffic signal at the Davis- Starnes\Rumfield intersection. At the present time this signal is in the letting process arid has a tentative installation date of September 1992. We have already contacted ~orth Richland Hills officials, the State Highway Department, and the office of State Senator Chris Harris regarding this matter. We all feel that the traffic con- ditions at this intersection are too hazardous to wait another ð'ear. Respectfully, The Undersigned Name ~~ --, (J llí G 't 'I--'-c~;-- ' , 7!.P J 7 Pó(lIJ V~, '1&;)t' ç;;£O '7& aCl¿~-1J Ûd _ (" - - _.1 _I 7ì p I ' ~ '" ~(_CAJ r/Y.'- __1.1 / (~/)I I (j'" '1~_..Y~ !.-J Name Name dress Name Address Name ./ Address Name Address Name Address o ~\.~ 7C,J. I fbu #/.- Address :2oíJ() ~ (Q.. 700 g FrÞd A- I th· t· t· d d· 7r IJ 13 ~ p¡¿ P ease IS pe 1 Ion an lreet any com~nlcatlon to: Karen C}t~¥~ , 6,1?~~J~field D1· /761~¡¡, - ,(~,~6-4~J), b~ Sep-. ~~ '" I ~5.%h ~~' -t/Frfl7Jvt ;-)ìCJ~r: ~. ¿¿J/~- [¿Del {YI- ~ ~ ~~ ~ - ?~a?r~/PA. ~. oL D0JrA '0~~ 1C:ÊP~ {~ "~ ~ ~,~ ----.- . ~ . - -.', .-:- - , ~ i-.. ~-~.. -~'~--'_,'/ ~ .:-- r ': \ lJ4. 1'~. ~-7~ 7ì,lf rJA. /0 "/??4 ¥NM~ ~ 7 ~ 3 7 ¿-~. Name ddress Address ~ I ~! I Ie I I I I I I I --. I I I I I I Ie I I ~ September 8, 1991 To The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: As home owners we do hereby petition the mayor and city council to review the immediate need for a traffic signal at the Davis- Starnes\Rumfield intersection. At the present time this signal is in the letting process and has a tentative installation date of September 1992. We have already contacted North Richland Hills officials, the State Highway Department, and the office of State Senator Chris Harris regarding this matter. We all feel that the traffic con- ditions at this intersection are too hazardous to wait another year. Respectfully, The Undersigned Name ... Add res s Õ ~ 3 7 _~'rr\.A~,,-J, Name )¡-- Address Name Address Address Name ' 7~ ,-J Name ~~~//~~ , Name ~Q~ 1[,\0 vH()t..D~/l ~ ( D Name Address Address Name Address Address Address Name Address // Name >? .> lIo -' . - ~~%fL ~---(( C' s: M I 7f:-1 ""-J ~. ^ ~.r-W>"\-R '2/ r (0 ?.r J 2J1''1/7/Ý ~ðJfJ./ "J.nu+h l\jt- ;j'..S 'fi .s h^ ,:1t, b~, 65;.// F¿j_j~' ~_ ~537 ELLIS l)¡¿ 3$37 ¿¿¿¿d D.-/ . Please return this petition and direct any communication to: Karen Clary, 7617 Northfield Dr. 76180 - (656-4217) by Sept. 23! '7 ,J I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I L./ S e p l e IU be,' 8, 1 a n 1 To The Honorable Mayor' alld (~i ly C()ullci 1 Member's: Ash 0 me 0 w n e r sin the Mea d 0 w vie wile i g h b 0 dl 0 0 d wed 0 her e by pet i t ion the mayor and city cOllllcil to I'cview the iuullediatc need 1'01' a traffic signal at the Davis-Starnes\Ruml'ield intersection. At the present time this signal is in the letting process and has a tentative installation ùate of Seplenlber, 1992. We have already contacted NOI,th Richland Bills officials, the State Highway Department, and the office of State Senator Chris Harris regarding this matter. We all feel that the traffic con- ditions at this intersection are too hazaròous to wait another year. RespectfulJy, The U 11 del' s i g rl e (t Name ,\ d d res s N anl e Address N aiDe Ad (11' e s s N an1 e Address Name Address Address A(}(lr cs s Name Address Address Name Name &LùAft;t. ~:t7V Address -7fjd() 7¿,:<4 :>1) .X:l 76~fÎ '7 10 3!o 7t77 ¡f II /./1';;/ ~1rM~1¿l:/ µ ¡}V~ ~!- 1(ffirJfI;/ f;; I¿ r)ï~¥:U j)~ /1 cl f . í" )h ! L-ðv (ÁJ I/f . AlnJf!:¿ff r~ " V" ' . /. . ,r 7 //. /~'~.'./'//. '. ~/,§.~ #/,;/ /~.-/// ~ ~ -' bt ~ Please return this petition and direct any co~nunication to: Karen Clary, 7617 Northfield Dr. 76180 - (656-4217) by Sept. 23! ; /(J I Ie I I I I I I I IItt I I I I I I Ie I I September 8, 1991 To The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: As home owners we do hereby petition the Inayor and city council to review the immediate need for a traffic signal at the Davis- Starnes\Rumfield intersection. At the present time this signal is in the letting process and has a tentative installation date of Septeßlber 1992. We have already contacted North Richland Hills officials, the State Highway Department, and the office of State Senator Chris Harris regarding this matter. We all feel that the traffic con- ditions at this intersection are too hazardous to wait another year. Respectfully, The Undersigned Address Address Address Address ý¿;t5/ {;:£ ~ ZÇ;,oLj K~J¿o(~è 3b 2 c:¿ K I r< K C 6 U R T Ýb 28 KI t<k- Co ueT Name Address (&' /1 ~3~ Kt\¡' k (l J"f'~ J V' '¡- Name '~ddress Address N am e . i/\ J< ; ,J'.w ./4 ~I Name 1K:;;h2.¿-'1~ "--0' V.I ~ Name Address Address Name Address Ph;'¿ /Z~ ~/2r- ¿tCl&¡ þ~' ¿'¡J g?~1 ~ ~ Please return this petition and direct any communication to: Karen Clary, 7617 Northfield Dr. 76180 - (656-4217) by Sept. 23! 6" '1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I ~/ September 8, 1991 To The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: As home owners in the Meadowview neighborhood we do hereby petition the ßlayor and city council to review tile ilnnlediate neeù for a traffic signal at the Davis-Starnes\Rumfield intersection. At the present time this signal is in the letting process and has a tentative inst,allation date of September, 1992. We have already contacted North Richland Hills officials, the State Highway Department, and the office of State Senator Chris Harris regarding this matter. We all feel that the traffic con- ditions at this intersection are too hazardous to wait another year. Respectfully, The Undersigned Name ? .-oA-¿!J' ~1 ///¿¿¿ Name " Address Address Address Address Address Address Address Address Address Address P: L~ 0 / l::1 r A-· L., J-J p R (v / t> ,~<',() J d/V ¿ 81 04 ¥ \r\~ lO-~\~ ~ì ?//} 1_;) /~ / £ ; I I ,-:( , I / Æ- , "',, /1 , , - r / }¿~ /"(,.:;0 I ~L 8'Z5 ;¿J¿ I~~ K-¿ ù g' ---f~ ¿~ y{;O 8' J{µL ~ Please return this petition and direct any communication to: Karen Clary, 7617 Northfield Dr. 76180 - (656-4217) by Sept. 23! ¡r; I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I (y I I I I Ie I L--'- September 8, 1991 To The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: As home owners in the Meadowview neighborhood we do hereby petition the mayor and city council to review the immediate need for' a traffic signal at the Davis-Starnes\Rumfield intersection. At the present time this signal is in the letting process and has a tentative installation date of September, 1992. We have already contacted North Richland Hills officials, the State Highway Department, and the office of State Senator Chris Harris regarding this matter. We all feel that the traffic con- ditions at this intersection are too hazardous to wait another year. Respectfully, The Undersigned Name /" Name /( Name 1 f {f/ 7 7(.11 '7 7 è (I '/(Jß lid < 7;r { '---, ! - ~ H i /r 1/ I (; < !)f' Address Name J ' 't¡; (J!/! iiI) j ,/1 (¿IV./ .../ ¿1 '~ritI(- II )¿'U2{L .---...~//' " . ~/ . / './,;/ -~ /' . /J../ , __ " . ~.-. ø-~_: ---1-- I' ¿~~/' . ',~ l-'( ..- // ,'. .-: ( .~ -1 / -yç~rr. (.. =---/1l'\ J~ '- ----- ---- '1/'~ ;'.': ~ ¡ . /.." /"'/-4' ~ · /./ ~ ,....., ,~"'" " . ~ - ~ - '\ ¿Q \ ~-'> :/ ·f ìl~ . t Name Address Address Address Name Address Name ::::~ç::~:~ '~,:J:;~~;/ r Name ///1^;i'J) Address Address '.¡: ~~"., /. "r""" .--'.y . , ~ ---- ............ Address /~ ...) c7' J / ,- 'l" / 'j' j ) ) I i I ../ ./../ ./'1 _ .......... ., Please return this petition and direct Kar~~.ClarY~~.7617 Nort.hfield Dr. 76180 \ \. L. QJ ) )1/; - ~ - ~'- "t,,-...L I - " ~ 1 "'- f/c / /~ ~ - ; (7?- (~Þ--'~~ ~ 4f ~)"'1 /t',,) ~ ,,~ /7/ e;.- "V~.I:--.. any communication to: _ (656-4217) by Sept. 23! fJL,-/k~ lt~ R/ 1\1; }~$uQLL.~_L _7t; Ð I f ¡{j41l4-/J~- 2_~·~ ~ _ ':'ff:2 rj , \1~ ,. ~' Ii '" .' '7 - _~' ~ ll.,vJ, , ~ .v.j , ) ò b r '1 ~ A. . ~ '.J 'L "If ~ -". '._ >..£ût_-Jj-¿, l 'rJl).~În_'_ 7~ (c:- fXAk:; '-. U Ì' . _. V ./\~~ - '"') ..--"'\ - "7 / '. l. to. l / i~', .,' . . -. -- . ..... ...- _. ...-:t!. ~. ~~ ,~.~ " (/~ ~ I· . Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I" I September 8, 1991 To The Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: As home owners in the Crestwood neighborhood we do hereby petition the mayor and city council to review the immediate need for a traffic signal at the Davis-Starnes\Rumfield intersection. At the present time this signal is in the letting process and has a tentative installation date of September, 1992. We have already contacted North Richland Hills officials, the State Highway Department, and the office of State Senator Chris Harris regarding this matter. We all feel that the traffic con- ditions at this intersection are too hazardous to wait another year. Respectfully, The Undersigned , , "/'/\ " ,/ _ / ;) II ^ ,-:. /, / f ,7iTT-g: ; l J ," ( LKJt{. [,'0 / Name: Address /; J J 'L"\ /ì :; . ")' . / 11 /) /) -) '-__¿'£/}--'\...(Lt'i l -<." ...? It - \. _, . .J ~ " '¡ /Î ') ,J. ';~. 7 /l, f'<~_Æf/II~ 1--1¿.¿~P/~, X- ' '( /ö2/ 3 () ..)-- 2- Address Name Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Please return this petition and direct any communication to: Karen Clary, 7617 Northfield Dr. 76180 - (656-4217) by Sept. 2'! I,. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL NO.IR 91-139 ~ )( ~ Date: October 28, 1991 Subject: Scheduling of Meeting Rooms - Pre Council, Council Chamber, Conference Room Recently problems have arisen on scheduling of meeting rooms for various Boards and Commissions. Several times a regularly scheduled monthly meeting has had to be moved from its usual meeting location. Priorities for resolving conflicts over meeting rooms have never been established. It is requested that the City Council establish a priority listing for use of the meeting rooms. A suggested guideline is: First: Second: City Council (regular meetings, work sessions, etc.) City Council Committees (comprised of Council Members and Staff) Regular Monthly Meetings (Planning & Zoning, Board of Adjustment, Parks and Recreation, Beautification, etc.) Ad Hoc Committees (Charter, CERT, Town Hall, etc.) Third: Fourth: Respectfully submitted, 9~~ Jeanette Rewis City Secretary JR:ph _ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CI1Y COUNCIL OF THE CI1Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CI1Y HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - OCTOBER 14, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order October 14, 1991, at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Byron Sibbet Mack Garvin Lyle E. Welch Mark Wood Jo Ann Johnson Charles Scoma Linda Spurlock Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath C.A. Sanford Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Greg Dickens City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer 2. INVOCATION Councilman Garvin gave the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Cub Scout Pack 22 led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 23,1991 APPROVED Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilwoman Johnson, to approve the minutes of the September 23, 1991 meeting. I Ie I I I I I I I te I I I I I I I. I I October 14, 1991 Page 2 Motion carried 7-0. 5. PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION MINUTES B. PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MINUTES C. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES No action necessary. 6. SPECIAL PRESENTATION BY MAYOR BROWN Mayor Brown presented Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary, with a plaque in appreciation of her 15 years of dedicated service as City Secretary for the City of North Richland Hills. 7. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet removed Item No. 22 from the Consent Agenda. 8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25 & 26) APPROVED Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Wood, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. *9. GN 91-141 ESTABLISHING AMBULANCE FEES - ORDINANCE NO. 1769 APPROVED *10. GN 91-142 JOINT PLANNING FOR POTENTIAL ATHLETIC AND RECREATION FACILITIES AT RICHLAND HIGH SCHOOL APPROVED II Ie I 'I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I October 14, 1991 Page 3 *11. GN 91-143 TREE PLANTING GRANTS - RESOLUTION NOS. 91-37 AND 91-38 APPROVED *12. GN 91-144 MARGUERITE DOE GRANT FUNDING APPROVED *13. GN 91-145 RENAMING OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SENIOR ADULT CENTER, 7301 BURSEY ROAD - RESOLUTION NO. 91-40 APPROVED *14. GN 91-146 SINGING HILLS WATER WELL SITE - RESOLUTION NO. 91-36 APPROVED *15. GN 91-147 AMENDMENT OF RULES, REGULATIONS, POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM- ORDINANCE NO. 1770 APPROVED 16. GN 91-148 LAIDLAW GARBAGE RATE INCREASE- RESOLUTION NO. 91-39 APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to approve Resolution No. 91-39. Council explained the rate increase was due to a governmental requirement pertaining to landfills. Council advised several meetings had been held with Laidlaw on discussion of the rate. Mr. Charles Cole, 6125 Riviera, spoke against increases. Mr. Cole felt the City should solicit from other companies. Mr. Max Reeve, representative from TECNOL, spoke against the rate increase and felt a study should be made on commercial customers. 'I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I October 14., 1991 Page 4 Council advised the committee did take into consideration the commercial accounts. Motion carried 7-0. *17. PU 91-33 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM LOYD AND LINDA MARTIN FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF BURSEY ROAD (PARCELS #5 AND #6) APPROVED *18. PU 91-34 APPROVAL TO PURCHASE AS/SET COMPUTER SOF1WARE APPROVED *19. PU 91-35 EXTENSION OF CONTRACT FOR AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES APPROVED *20. PU 91-36 EXTENSION OF OFFICE SUPPLY CONTRACT APPROVED *21. PU 91-37 APPROVE PURCHASE FOR REMOTE-READ WATER METERS APPROVED 22. PW 91-31 APPROVE CONTRACT WITH BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR RUFE SNOW DRIVE TRAFFIC STUDY APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to approve PW 91-31. Motion carried 7-0. *23. PAY 91-12 APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 12 IN THE AMOUNT OF $29,453.50 FOR MAPLEWOOD AVENUE BRIDGE AT CALLOWAY BRANCH IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED I' Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I October 14~ 1991 Page 5 *24. PAY 91-13 FINAL PAYMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES _ BLAND HARPER, ARCHITECT/PROJECT MANAGER APPROVED *25. PAY 91-14 FINAL PAYMENT TO NEMA 3 ELECTRIC, INC. FOR RICHFIELD PARK LIGHTING PROJECT APPROVED *26. PAY 91-15 APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTORS, INC.. FOR WATAUGA ROAD MEDIAN LANDSCAPING APPROVED 27. CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mr. Tom Reilly, 6828 Megan, spoke on the proposed mall going in on the northeast corner of Loop 820 and Rufe Snow. Mr. Reilly stated Rufe Snow already carried a lot of traffic and asked how the City planned on handling the traffic that would be generated. Staff advised there were hopes of extending Industrial Boulevard from south of Browning to Loop 820 and traffic could then go west under Rufe Snow to the Meadow Lakes exit to go north. Mr. Marlin Miller, 5109 Susan Lee, asked the cost of the study that was to be done on Rufe Snow. Mr. Miller also asked what the City was receiving from Laidlaw on recycling. Staff replied the cost of the study would be $12,422 and the City had received $12,593 in revenue from Laidlaw on the recycling. Mr. Charles Cole, 6125 Riviera, asked if any progress had been made on the request that had been made pertaining to no trespassing signs. Attorney for the City explained he had been in trial and had not had time to research it. Mr. Cole asked who was responsible for cleaning the lakes in Meadow Lakes. Mr. Cole was advised the developer was responsible for cleaning the lakes. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I October 14, 1991 Page 6 Mr. Cole stated he would urge the City not to participate with the School District in the building of tennis courts and the swimming pool. Mr. Cliff Stevens, 9201 Kirk Lane. stated he felt the City should negotiate with Laidlaw to allow the citizens to use the dump ground free anytime. Mr. Marlin Miller, 5109 Susan Lee Lane, asked when the City was going to get the Fort Worth sign off of the post office building. Mayor Brown advised that it was being worked on. Ms. Myrtis Byrd, 7312 Hialeah Circle West, asked if the City could meet regularly with the EP A to stay informed on their activities. Ms. Byrd was advised that TML was constantly in touch with the EP A and kept the cities informed. 28. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 7-0. Tommy Brown - Mayor A lTEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Sufficient Funds Available _ Operating Budget _ I:s ~ ¿K~ -e1/l ~~~ Depaftment Head Signature I"'" city Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM epartment: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Community Development 10/28/91 ~ Council Meeting Date: Public Hearing for request of herman J. Smith to rezone Lut J and Lots 5 thru 13, Block A, Lots 6 thru 11, Block B, and Lots 1 thru 7, Block C, Richland Oaks Addition, from R-1 Single Family Residential and C-l Commercial to C-2 Commercial. This property is located on the east side of Oakridge Terrace and north of Airport Freeway. Ordinance # 1771 PZ 91-21 Agenda Number: Mr. Herman smith and Mr. Marvin D. Snodgrass have submitted a joint request to rezone a 17. 8 acre tract of land located near the intersection of Bedford-Euless Road and Airport Freeway for commercial development. The property is being considered for a major commercial project. The staff has notified all effected property owners located within 200 feet of the property being considered for a zoning change. The Planning and Zoning commission reviewed this request at their October loth meeting and has recommended approval of the Zoning District change. Reco..endation: It is recommended that the city Council hold the required public hearinq and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. . FInance DIrector Page 1 of FEB 21,89 IMO,I541,1542,1543 1544,1545, ItS". 15S6,1S5~ 155&,1562 C-I 1563,1564,1570,1571 1573.1576,15~ 1590 I DEC 14,. 1e53, 1600, 1602,1608 1615,1619,1621, 1625 1828,163~ 1839,1642 0 ~L Y 8,90 16el, 1655, 1664, 1673 N .. 1674,1675 )00 c APRIL I, 91 1683,1686,1693,1699 . z " i 1709,1720 l I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I Page 6 P & Z Minutes October 10, 1991 ~ - · 'VI ,..._........-..-..r....~~4--..-..:,........~Wt..~,.....~=-~~...né ~:W,...~A~~=-~" ~JJIr'Ì..~:::.::~ :~~._._- ..- ........~~ PS 91-21 M;~.J1111a~.1ftadê·aftîê"~otion to approve APPROVED _..~_.....__........,.---""·~s 91-21. This motion was seconded by . ....-.,~iI~·~ Ms. Marin and the motion carried 7-0. M _I?~~~_""'" ..... ,.__....'.#~~III......~~....;..._____eu..._____...-.~........~___..,~~~Iì............~..- ~....-.-....,. 5. PZ 91-21 Public Hearing for request of Herman J. Smith to rezone Lot 3 and Lots 5 thru 13, Block A, Lots 6 thru 11, Block B, and Lots 1 thru 7, Block C, Richland Oaks Addition, from R-l Single Family Residential and C-l Commercial to C-2 Commercial. This property is located on the east side of Oakridge Terrace and north of Airport Freeway. Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Ross Calhoun with Herman Smith Company came forward. He said he was representing Mr. Smith and Mr. Snodgrass in their rezoning request. Mr. Calhoun said this is approximately 17.8 acres bounded on the south by Airport Freeway and on the west by Oak Ridge Terrace. He said they are requesting C-2 zoning for this property. Mr. Calhoun said they believe the time for development of this property is at hand. He said they have been working with the city staff and will probably be in this week with a plat of this property. Chairman Brock said this will be another great asset to our city. Mr. Bowen asked Mr. Calhoun if they had made any progress in purchasing the out lot there. Mr. Calhoun said not at this time. He said they hope to obtain it, but have not at this time. I ) . Ie I Page 7 P & Z Minutes October 10, 1991 I I I I I PZ 91-21 APPROVED Chairman Brock called for anyone else wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. There being no one, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Marin made the motion to approve PZ 91-21. This motion was seconded by Mr. Miller and the motion carried 7-0. I f' 6. PZ 91-09 TABLED 9/26/91 ...............·_~...........~;~.........W..."d;..-'J~_G~..fWIJIUa............,~_H~"III....,.... I I I I PZ 91-09 APPROVED I I 7. Ie I I Consideration of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding carnivals and other special eventsJ~ ot.,;' Chairman Brock stated this wa~~abled at the last, meeting to give;Maff time to incorporate some ide~þ.ea ~~rom the Planning and Zoning Copmission. He said Mr. LeBaron ha~e-written the ordinance and we)JE!ed to look at it to make sure it i~our intentions and then send ~~n to the City Council. i~ Mr. Bowen said there is one thing. He said .",: need to strike out "containing a east 6 acres" in paragraph (b). Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 91-09 with the deletion of five words in paragraph (b) "containing at least six acres". This motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the motion carried 7-0. Consideration of a proposed Detention/Retention/Decorative Pond Ordinance. Chairman Brock stated the Commission looked at this at their last meeting and it was tabled for further study. He said he was not sure they had made any progress. It I. I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I ORDINANCE NO. 1771 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-91-21 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-l and C-l to C-2. BEING all that certain tract, parcel, or lot of land located in the Heirs of E.S. Carder Survey, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of Blocks A, B, and C, Richland Oaks Addition, Third Filing, an addition to Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 388-7, Page 81, of the Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of Lot 7 of said Block C; THENCE South 00 degrees 04 minutes 00 seconds West, 909.88 feet along the east line of said Block C and the aforesaid Block B to a point in the northwest line of State Highway 121; THENCE South 51 degrees 01 minutes 00 seconds West, 185.71 feet along said northwest line of State Highway 121 to a point; THENCE South 54 degrees 48 minutes 00 seconds West, 154.24 feet along said northwest line of State Highway 121 to a point; THENCE South 57 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West, 59.80 feet along said northwest line of State Highway 121 to a point; THENCE South 60 degrees 57 minutes 15 seconds West, 159.40 feet along said northwest line of State Highway 121 to a point; THENCE North 89 degrees 40 minutes 00 seconds West, 260.92 feet to a point for the southwest corner of Lot 3 of the aforesaid Block A; THENCE North 00 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, 200.00 feet along the west line of Lot 3, Block A to a point for the southwest cornerof Lot 4, Block A; THENCE South 89 degrees 40 minutes 00 seconds East, 200.00 along the south line of Lot 4, Block A to a point for the southeast corner of Lot 4, Block A; IJ ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I Ie I I Page 2 THENCE North 00 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, 200.00 along the east line of Lot 4, Block A to a point for the northeast corner of Lot 4, Block A; THENCE North 89 degrees 40 minutes 00 seconds West, 200.00 feet along the north line of Lot 4, Block A to a point; THENCE North 00 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, 834.15 feet to a point for the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block C; THENCE South 88 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East, 200.83 feet along the north line of Block C to a point; THENCE South 89 degrees 25 minutes 00 seconds East, 518.90 feet along the north line of Block C to the point of beginning, containing 17.873 acres of land, more or less. This property is located on the east side of Oakridge Terrace and north of Airport Freeway. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 10th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1991. ~æ DON BOWEN, SECRETARY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-91-21 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY . , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .partment: Subject: Cðmmuni ty Development Council Meeting Date: 10/28/91 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) e Operating Budget ::s . ~8~ ~ment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , RAqt1A~t: nr Vn] kman I sIne... for Replat Agenda Number: PS 91-17 of Lots 2R-IR thru 18R-IR, Block 26, and Lots 4R-1R thru 7R-IR, Block 33, Holiday West Addition, section 10. This property is located on Cancun Drive and Buenos Aries Drive. Volkman's Inc. is the owner of several lots in the Holiday West Addition that are currently zoned for Zero Lot Line dwelling units. The company has submitted a request to replat 26 of the lots into 23 lots and thus give each lot additional width. The developer has satisfied all engineering comments. The Planning and Zoning commission requested the developer to add a five foot utility easement along the west side property line of Lot 7R-1R, Block 33 (at the southwest part of the repIat) so that adequate side yard clearance is provided between the adjacent lot and any home constructed on Lot 7R-1R. The developer has agreed to this request and it is shown on the Replat drawing. No water, sewer or street improvements will be required for this repIat. Sidewalks will be required for each lot and these will be installed as building permits are issued for construction of each dwelling unit. The Planning and Zoning commission reviewed and approved this replat at their October 10th meeting. Reco.-endation: It is recommended that the City council approve the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning commission. Finance Review - Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available - ¡ÇfL~ . Finance Director City Manager Page 1 of I';:~-" Ie I I I I I I II II I ..."t u -. C-2 I ei¡~ I 26 - ~ ~ R-7-MF - I ! ~. u.O - 1 ~I ua - r.. _ .y 1091 I"""-- ¡;¡¡¡¡;; C-I 1 I ~ , , , :: . \ \ \ \ \'XII Æ8tt ............ ~œ' ¡ilJ- LU~N ~ if' ' ,,' / I~ I .ItICH.. aND if I G if ,ftFlt.. \ /l I , ¡ ¡! ' ¡ SCHOOL!',,_... 1 I 'I 1 "-1J I IIIII u 11 -r I ~ ~~= J __ ~ þ§ - t:r:~\ ~ ~m-~<:~ ~;~ t ! 1{gJ l a. I". , \ \ \ \ \ , , R-2 F:~ C-2 9 ~ c- -sU. [!- ~ ~--~--- r- iiiiI.' ~-,r-a . ~.cI2 ~. _ C-2- flU(J C-2 su· 1110 ~:- ~d .." ~l . ~~ ~1 " ~'-' R-7-MF Iff. '0" R-7-MF C-2 1450 / --- C-2 1164 ,tlK: .... ..oI!I P""" ~/' ~ ~. l¥ --'L - - OFFICE USE (PO) LR S U . -n."r~E u~~,~2-.1~OJ7i~aøa.. ~M.íf\ ~ U I II~:~ I _'6_~ .. -.. ~u:;æ ~øp< ~ t ::y:::: ~-J\ r7\ 11 I r~ - J ::IE: - '\ l· ;l IJ I lIT ~ ~ ~;" ...-11 - -~ -~ C:l: III IIIII J~ ~ ~ -~ !!!."\ I 1"..- _..d - F.= = ~ ~y rr=- :::N' 1 -- - ~ ~~1 TJ 1. "( "'TN 'UCN..aNO IUIII. i- ~ I , , I I í'l- .. Þ- T\ 1 1\-, ..u.... ...... SCHOOL. t- j \ \ I I I I I Þ- ~;II I, I I I I I II I ¡ rtlllll 1 I I 1 W ,I J I I fT111111...'11 II II .-- ~ ~ _I ~ \1, ~ IIII~ ... I III~~~ I j,\,l IJ. ·llllllfl/rTTT I 1 I II t--i HlI PI( I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1 . PS 91-17 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS OCTOBER 10, 1991 - 7:30 P. M. L - ~-... Chairman Brock called the meeti~ order at 7:30 P.M. ~~ ?p' .~,,:..,J PRE SENT: ..;.,+.tI'" Chairman ;~v James Brock Vice Chairman _. .~';'<Þ-":'P' David Barfield ~:~~:~:ry .~./>,.~j~' ~~: ~~:~~ .>:<..f/ Don Collins Pat Marin Paul Miller Wayne Moody Barry LeBaron Steve Pence Wanda Calvert ~..,,~ .s" .¡Þ' .;..,.... J-ìr . ;'" ~Ält. Member Dir. Community Dev. Building Official p & Z Coordinator , ,. .' ,,·f,..? .' .;ßr :"./,':1' .~y ....;P¡.j~ ~:,; J' <,J) Since all members are present, Alternate Member Moody will not vote. THE MINUTES 1991 Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Barfield and the motion carried 6-0 with Mr. Collins abstaining since he was not present at the meeting. ~..··-4t~~ta~ñ!!l~f~~.~·DfIfti~~~ Public Hearing for request of Volkman's Inc. for Replat of Lots 2R-1R thru 18R-1R, Block 26, and Lots 4R-1R thru 7R-IR, Block 33, Holiday West Addition, Section 10. This property is located on Cancun Drive and Buenos Aries Drive. Chairman Brock opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this Replat to please come forward. John Volkman came forward. He said they are widening the lots to make more room between the houses, make it more attractive, make it more marketable for them and make it a better product for the city. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I Page 2 P & Z Minutes October 10, 1991 Mr. Barfield said the City Staff had a problem with Lot 4R-1R, Block 33. He said if you build a zero lot line house, you would be building right up to an R-3 lot. He said you need to change the configuration of the lots on Buenos Aries. Mr. Volkman said he has no problem with that. Chairman Brock said all they need to do is flip the lots over. Mr. Barfield said this needs to be done before it is sent to the City Council. Chairman Brock called for anyone else wishing to speak in favor of this Replat to please come forward. There being no one, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this Replat to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing. PS 91-17 APPROVED Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PS 91-17 with the recommendation the staff coordinate a re-configuration of the lots in Block 33 so the zero lot line side will not butt up against the R-3 and that Lot 4R-1R will end up more like a standard residential lot. This motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the motion carried 7-0. .......~..~~~~,.,.~..oIUIF...J¡~~~J:',/JU..F~..~~~~~~~tfiImDŒ 2. PS 91-18 Request of Star Plat of Lo. , Calloway . 1:A1ht!-f'f~ This property is located at ~ .~:øIL~ the southeast corner of Northeast Loop ~:~~-~----- Ie City of JXòrth Richland Hills I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I I September 23, 1991 Ref: PWM 91-098 MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Director of utilities SUBJECT: PS 91-17; HOLIDAY WEST SECTION 10; Replat I have reviewed the subject documents received in our office on September 18, 1991. Public Works has no additional comments. ~~L: KBM/smm (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180 I '71~ Ie 904 uN" Hwy. 731 Crowley, Texas 76036 I Phone: 297-2911 I I I I I I fit I I I I I I Ie I I '.e., September 19, 1991 Wanda Calvert City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas Ms. Calvert, 76180 Please be advised that we have attempted to answer all of the engineer's comments on Holiday West Addition, Section 10. Land Development Thank-rï' 4A1^^--- John C. Volkman Volkman's, Inc. 904 N. Hwy. 731 Crowley, IX 76031 Donald T. Volkman President ------ Residential Construction and Sales I Ie City of JXòrth Richland Hills I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I September 11, 1991 Ref: PWM 91-091 MEMO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Director of utilities SUBJECT: PS 91-17; HOLIDAY WEST, SECTION 10; Block 26, Lots 2R-1R through 18R-1R; Block 33 Lots 4R-1R through 7R-1R; Final Plat I have reviewed the subject documents submitted to this office on August 21, 1991 and offer the following comments. 1. The Surveyor's seal and signature should be added to the Plat. 2. The title block should be revised as shown. 3. The address and telephone number for the Owner should be added to the Plat. 4. The attached easement dedication should be incorporated into the closing paragraph after the Metes and Bounds description. 5. The Subdivision Ordinance requires a 7.5 foot utility Easement around the perimeter of the property. The existing 5 foot easement should be revised accordingly. 6. The intersections at Trinidad and Cancun will require a Sidewalk and Utility Easement as defined in the Design Manual. The easement should be clearly indicated on the Final Plat. 7. Building Setback lines should be shown for the lots adjacent to this plat. 8. All zoning for the proposed lots and the adjacent lots should be clearly indicated on the face of the plat. 9. Due to the recently passed Zoning Ordinance, this subdivision will be required to construct sidewalks throughout. The sidewalks may be constructed as the individual lots are improved. (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -- I I September 11, 1991 PWL 91-091 Page Two 10. The utility services should be relocated prior to filing this plat. This area has been platted three times previous to this plat. The services are no longer in their proper location. The Developer has gone to some expense to physically locate the existing services. The Developer's Engineer has an approved plan for relocating the services. Public Works feels that the plan should be carried out prior to another replat. The plan calls for the water and sewer relocations to comply with the new lot configuration. 11. The marked-up blue lines should be returned with the next submittal. ~ ~-: Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Director of utilities cc: Gregory W. Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works/Utilities Barry LeBaron, Director of Community Development I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Source of Funds: _ Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget ~ Oth I , , I I , I I apartment: ComM11n; ~y nAVA 1 npmAn~ Council Meeting Date: 10/28/91 Req1lest of stAr Rn~ørpr; ~A 'fnr Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Calloway Addition. This property is located at the southeast corner of Northeast Loop 820 and Grapevine Highway. Agenda Number: PS 91-18 star Enterprise is the owner of a .7 acre tract of land located at the southeast corner of Loop 820 and Grapevine Highway. The site was previously occupied by a service station which has been closed due to the proposed reconstruction of the Airport Frwy./Loop 820 interchange. Additional right-of-way was required by the Texas Highway Department and this severely impacted the existing commercial structure located on the lot. star Enterprise intends to plat the remaining property into a new and smaller building site for possible use as a future new service station. The developer has satisfied all staff and engineering comments. The Planning and Zoning Commission allowed the developer to remove a 15 foot side building set-back line from the plat because it was not necessary to incumber the plat with an unwarranted site restriction. The enclosed plat has been reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their October 10th meeting. Reco:maendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ £I!A~~ artment Head Signature · v ~ Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance DIrector Page 1 of I Ie I I Page 2 P & Z Minutes October 10, 1991 I I, .......~-;¡¡,¡¡¡¡~,~¡¡¡,¡¡.'Ji-.:.1.:J,·J¡¡,~W...;;.¡.;¡;;;;:;;x.;;:. ;,¡;; ',':;';;~...::.t':;:"'l:~j!.j~ ;.z::'-.t.:::':'';;;;.t¡:;:':~'''~~~~~~::~:t.".;''J!!:~';~;¡¡:;:;J;,:J;. ~t'i;.:&;:tc'i'~7' Mr. Barfield said the City Staff had . ..~ problem with Lot 4R-IR, Block 33. ,~ said if you build a zero lot lin~~ house, you would be building r~}it up to an R-3 lot. He said you ~èed to change the configuration ofithe lots ',:Y on Buenos Aries. rj' ;~,~.f' ".\ Mr. Volkman said he qas no problem with that .,.J;'J" Chairman Brock...S~id all they need to do is flip tþe~ lots over. Mr. Barf!~ld said this needs to be done be:f'ore it is sent to the City Counc'il. .~./ . 'to". :Chairman Brock called for anyone else ~~vwishing to speak in favor of this ..,f· Replat to please come forward. ,,ft' I I I -- " , -,. . There being no one, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this Replat to please come forward. I I .. ... .!:- ,. -~.~' I., r:.:"" .. v; r OJ" "if' .-~;~ .' ,ì ,'1l There being no one wishing to speak, Chairman Brock closed the Public Hearing. I ;f" ,~.: ~ tit :.i' .' Y:r' .,;.".J'" I PS 91~17 APP¡ðVED 1/ y /~ , / L__ Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PS 91-17 with the recommendation the staff coordinate a re-configuration of the lots in Block 33 so the zero lot line side will not butt up against the R-3 and that Lot 4R-IR will end up more like a standard residential lot. This motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the motion carried 7-0. ~IIPIJ....,.... .. ---.... ·~-·~~~ft!P.IIltJ~~'.~~:____~"'.ua..........,. .. ~1:at~-~;w¡~"J'iit...............--...____ - I I I 2. PS 91-18 Request of Star Enterprise for Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Calloway Addition. This property is located at the southeast corner of Northeast Loop 820 and Grapevine Highway. Ie I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I Page 3 P & Z Minutes October 10, 1991 PS 91-18 APPROVED Daniel Joslin came forward to represent Yandell and Hiller Engineers and Star Enterprise. He said Star Enterprise wants to totally revamp this site to their new style and their new gas stations. Mr. Joslin said they have worked with City Staff and have complied with all the Engineer's comments. Chairman Brock said the Commission and Staff have talked about removing the 15 foot set back on the side to give a little more room. Mr. Joslin said they have no problem with that. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 91-18 with the additional comment that the 15 foot building line on the east side be removed. This motion was seconded by Mr. Miller and the motion carried 7-0. ~Ø!:a.~~~~m"'I\rJi:~~.:a..J~~~oAU"~' - 3. PS 91-20 .J i'" -,;,¡ ~~"" ,. ..,' ~ ,1 .II" ,?r ..JiÞ -.1'.1' ».~ ,.;' #' /,. ,, ~~ county on Industrial Park Boulevard ~.iDt.'3r."'t::t'!:I~~~~;;L n;;,¡¡¡.-,r .~'''1<X-~.~.r."1r.m~~1'....''!:~..uB'....1Ir.wvJB'DIII_.t'''-______ -.,.,,,~$' Request of Rufe Snow/Loop 820, A Texas General Partnership for Preliminary Plat of Blocks 3, 4, 5, & 6, TaßP"" Addition. This property is loëáted north of Northeast Loop 8~nd west -,/ of Rufe Snow Drive. . /~. .-~ / Mr. Stanley Pe~~hd, a partner of the ./ Partnership..t:,-~ame forward. He said represe~~·~tives from Everage Engineers are..J?XJésent also. ~/ .,/~r. Bowen said the Commission ;,' discussed this plat in their 1;Þ';~' pre-meeting regarding access for the /""/ property. He said Boulder Drive extends north to where Industrial Boulevard ends. He asked Mr. LeBaron to fill us in on what is happening to Industrial Boulevard. Mr. LeBaron showed a map of the area. He said the city is about to start construction in cooperation with the I Ie I I I I I I I II' I I I I I I Ie I I City of JXòrth Richland Hills September 23, 1991 Ref: PWM 91-097 MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Director of utilities SUBJECT: PS 91-18; CALLOWAY ADDITION; Lot 1, Block 1; Final Plat I have reviewed the subject documents received in our office on September 3, 1991. Public Works has no additional comments. ,~~Z?øL- KBM/srnm (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICH lAND HillS, TEXAS 76180 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .epartment: SUbject: Comm'1ni ty DevA 1 OI'mAn~ ~ Council Meeting Date: 10/28/91 RequQst of Brookes Ba~ør Surveyors for Amending Final Plat of Steeple Ridge Addition. This property is located west of Davis Blvd. and north of Shady Grove Rd. Agenda Number: PS 91-21 - Brookes Baker Surveyors has advised the City that there are some dimensional errors in the Steeple Ridge Final Plat and have submitted a corrected plat for approval. State regulations contained in Section 212.016 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulate the procedures for approval of a corrected plat. If the Final Plat was still in the review cycle with the City, it would be a simple matter of handling this administratively. However, since the Final Plat previously approved by the City Council on 10-8-90 has been filed for record in the County Clerk's Office it will be necessary to comply with the amended plat regulations. The State platting regulations allow a city to approve an amended plat without the need for a public hearing if the purpose of the Amended Plat is to correct- a technical error in distance or a bearing, such as the case in this agenda item. No lot lines are being changed. Only the correct dimensions are being added to the few lots being corrected. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this corrected plat at its October 10th meeting and has recommended approval as submitted. I Reco..endation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: ec?0ndS (GO/Rev.) _ or~:~ Budget J - P /J p~~ ¡3C4~ ~ · !/A7~ Depamrient Head Signature I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of I I R-2 ,.'s .: u .. I AG I f I C-I 1254 I AG R-3 1201 I I IS I I 0-1 1220 0-1 1204 I AG I I- ii I I I I I I - I I I I I I Ie I I s~aff person later to say they can no~ have a sign there because they don'y' have X-number square footage buil~g there. Mr. Barfield said we waqi'to make it clear and it be in t.:h~~fecord for your protection. .~~ Mr. Peskind said he app-~~iates that. ..... ,,#'!P Mr. Lueck said he would like to encourage the st~'r~ if Mr. Peskind does give this:~fght-of-way, to work with him and Jj.:iOé sure it is not forgotten .ç~;t he gave the right-of~ày . ,..,J.' Cha~~~n Brock said this center will be~~ tremendous asset to our city. He $~id there is one other thing, the .,.)' ~~ striping of the left hand storage lane ,;,' on Combs. .~~. .~ r;' J~ ,;'1- ;r' ,.. ¡ir ]I' ~} J-r' ~..I';" ...' Page 5 P & Z Minutes October 10, 1991 - PS 91-20 APPROVED 4. PS 91-21 .-~- Mr. LeBaron said we will need to get with the city engineers and see how far it needs to go. Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PS 91-20 with the stipulation that the plat be re-drawn to show the 12 feet of right-of-way along the eastern property line for a future turning lane, the radii discussed on Boulder be applied, the striping on Boulder be applied and if necessary be put on the plat, and a special note be made that Lot 1, Block 5, is to be used for signage. This motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the motion carried 7-0. _~"""",,~"~~~~~.A'm~·~·.~~V.ma~ Request of Brookes Baker Surveyors for Corrected Final Plat of Steeple Ridge Addition. This property is located west of Davis Boulevard and north of Shady Grove Road. Chairman Brock stated that this is just house keeping. He said there were some type-o's and the plat had already been recorded. I Ie I I - I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I Page 6 P & Z Minutes October 10, 1991 Mr. Miller made the motion to approve PS 91-21. This motion was seconded by Ms. Marin and the motion carried 7-0. 5.~;-;;~~aum&~~-~Q(~D~~~~:-~erman 7 J. Smith to rezone Lot 3 and Lots 5 ~, thru 13, Block A, Lots 6 thru 11, ~ Block B, and Lots 1 thru 7, Block ç¡; Richland Oaks Addition, from R-l.,,-' Single Family Residential and .~1 Commercial to C-2 Commercial."/ This property is located on the>~east side of Oakridge Terrace and pårth of Airport Freeway. PS 91-21 APPROVED ,,' Chairman Brock ope~èd the Public Hearing and cal~ed for those wishing to speak in fayor of this request to please come~Jorward. A)" ..'f/ "!" Ross Calþóun with Herman Smith Company came ~prward. He said he was repreŠenting Mr. Smith and Mr. Sqpdgrass in their rezoning request. ~. Calhoun said this is approximately i;' ...(~' 17 .8 acres bounded on the south by §,Þ' t-';- Airport Freeway and on the west by Oak .jl;" Ridge Terrace. He said they are ~.;¡,.j/ requesting C-2 zoning for this property. Mr. Calhoun said they believe the time for development of this property is at hand. He said they have been working with the city staff and will probably be in this week with a plat of this property. ""."1)' ~' t' 1jI).' ~ -:;,I ,. V /f ., w' ..~ .r /., ,¡:..,;? ...y' Chairman Brock said this will be another great asset to our city. Mr. Bowen asked Mr. Calhoun if they had made any progress in purchasing the out lot there. Mr. Calhoun said not at this time. He said they hope to obtain it, but have not at this time. ~~~......~...&t~.J:..~~~.~.&:~~"""'~4~1f"M'''''''''-· ~ . '~. I I. I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -- I I ........... OCT-03-'91 THU 08:11 ID:GAREY W GILLEY TEL NO:817-332-4665 **412 P02 CMMV w. "~&.8V DaN W. HlCICIY eTIPI1lN M, ..0....... IttMuaHlO ,.. BROOKES BAKER SURVeYORS A ~ OOlltPOMnON Tina MID fOIIOIMNO IUlWlVING MGOKn IA.... IULaNI - '1' I!. IU.... ."..T 1""71 It MITRO ...,. PORT WOImf. TIDWI N...... __IMIII ""'t~ JOHN 'I u... (1-.'''' It ~I ....., ODIIIIULTMT ....D M, MOMII. 00Ire1UL. TMT october 3, 1991 b. Wanda Calvert City of No~th Rlchland H1lla RE: S~..pl.r1dge Addition This 18 to notify you that there has been some scribner errors 418covered on the original map of record. W. r..pecttully reque.t ~.~ the corrected map of st..pler1dqe be refiled at the oour-thou... If you have any qu..tiona, plea.. call, sine.rely, BROOICBS BAKER SURVEYORS .. ,O~ ~. #-<-.¿p~ Don W. Hickey DR I bQ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS epartment: ~ Subject: ~ I ~ community Development Consideration of an amendment ~o subdivision Ordinance #1519 requiring masonry screening walls along major thoroughfares. ~ Council Meeting Date: 10128/91 GN 91~97 Agenda Number: Ordinance #1750 At the July 22nd Council meeting, action was deferred on a proposed amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance to require the construction of masonry screening walls for all new subdivisions platted along major thoroughfares. The concerns of the Council were: (1) Requiring masonry screening walls along C2U thoroughfares may not be appropriate, (2) Someone may construct an unattractive plain concrete wall, and (3) The maintenance requirement for a homeowners association is the wrong approach. ~ The planning and Zoning commission has completed a second review of the proposed regulations and made modifications to eliminate the masonry wall requirement on Minor Collector streets (C2U). It was determined that masonry screening walls should only be required along thoroughfares with four or more lanes. Initially, it was anticipated that masonry screening walls would be required along every thoroughfare shown on the Master Thoroughfare Plan, even Collector streets with two lanes. The technical specifications contained in the Design Manual for Public Works will prohibit "ordinary concrete finishes" and ass~re that masonry screening are aesthetically attractive. The proposed ordinance provides the Planning and Zoning Commission with the opportunity of reviewing a1 ternati ve maintenance plans, such as a maintenance bond or a similar plan which is satisfactory to the city. At the september 26th meetinq the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the attached Orãinance #1750 to amend the Subdivision Ordinance to require masonry screening walls on C4U thoroughfares and larger as shown on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. The .attached materials also includes a copy of the proposed technical construction specifications which will be contained in the Design Manual for Public Works. The technical specifications are not part of the Subdivision Ordinance and are provided for your information. Reco_endation: It is recommended that the city Council approve the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: ~onds (GO/Rev.) _ ~perating Budget 01;(1~~~~~ ütr ¡¿/JIl/~ Depa'rtment Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1750 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1579, THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, TO ESTABLISH MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY OR CONCRETE SCREENING WALLS ALONG CERTAIN MAJOR THOROUGHFARES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: I. THAT, ORDINANCE 1579, "THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS", SECTION 1-01, Subsection D, be hereby amended to insert a new Paragraph 7, to hereafter be and read as follows: 7. Every newly platted subdivision or resubdivision of existin~ residential lots adjacent to a C-4U thoroughfare or larger as shown on the prevailIng Master Thoroughfare Plan shall comply with the screening wall requirements as provided in this section. 7.1 The developer of any lot located in a newly platted subdivision or resubdivision of existing residential lots adjacent to a C-4-U thoroughfare or larger as shown on the prevailing Master Thoroughfare Plan shall be required to construct a masonry or concrete screening wall along and adjacent to said thoroughfare. However, a replat of an existing one lot subdivision on a Collector Street is exempt. 7.2 The Masonry or concrete screening wall shall be constructed in a manner consistent with the standards and specifications contained in the Design Manual for Public Works/Utilities. No masonry or concrete screening wall or its foundation shall be constructed within the street right-oi-way. Furthermore, any masonry screening wall constructed within the City of North Richland Hills not required by Section 7.1 of this Ordinance shall be constructed in a manner consistent with the standards and specifications contained in the Design Manual for Public Works/Utilities. 7.3 Unless an alternative maintenance plan is determined satisfactory to the Planning and Zoning Commission, a maintenance agreement between the City and a Homeowners Association for the continued maintenance of said screening wall shall be included with the Final Plat submittal. II. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, para~raphs or sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the CIty Council without the incorporation in this I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I 2 ordinance of any such invalid or unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. III. SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance No. 1579, The Subdivision Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, as amended shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. IV. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING C SEPTEMBERl991. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS , 1991 DA Y OF MAYOR A TIEST: CITY SECRETARY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY I Ie I I I I I I .1 Ie I I I I I I Ie I I SECTION 1-07 MASONRY/CONCRETE SCREENING WALLS A. CONSTRUCTION Masonry or concrete screening walls shall be constructed according to the following specifications: 1. Concrete foundations shall have a minimum compressive strenght of 3000 PSI at 28 days. Compresive strength tests conducted by an independent testing laboratory shall be submitted to the City staff for confirmation. All testing costs shall be paid by the developer or his contractor. 2. Reinforcing steel shall be new billet steel conforming to the requirements of ASTM A-615-GR.60. 3. Concrete for peirs shall be place within 8 hours of drilling pier holes. 4. Brick masonry shall be as approved by the City. 5. Mortar shall be Type "S". 6. Construction shall be in accordance with the requirements of the "Recommended Practice for Engineered Brick Masonry" Brick Institute of America. 7. Use #9 Gauge 1-3/4" wide galvanized ladder wire to extend horizontal in wall panel on every course. 8. The wall shall be a minimum of six feet in height as measured from the nearest/adjacent sidewalk grade. No masonry or concrete screening wall or column shall exceed eight feet in height unless the wall is functioning as a retaining wall and is designed as such. 9. Where it has been determined by the Director of Public Works that no drainage problems are anticipated, a four (4) inch opening, or similar design, to allow for storm water drainage shall be provided. 10. Prefabricated screening fences such as "brickcrete" or "woodcrete" may be substituted for on-site masonry construction, provided that the finish resembles typical masonry constructed fences. No ordinary concrete finishes shall be allowed. However, a concrete finish consisting of exposed aggregate shall be allowed. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I 11. The color of the wall shall be uniform on each side of a thoroughfare for the entire length between two intersecting Collector or greater streets. The finish of the wall shall be consistent on all surfaces. 12. All masonry or concrete screening walls shall be designed by a Professional Engineer registered in the state of Texas. Sealed plans shall be submitted to the City for review. B. LOCATION The location of masonry or concrete screening walls shall be as follows: 1. No masonry or concrete screening wall shall be located on public right-of-way. 2. Sight triangles shall be provided at street intersections according to the schedule contained elsewhere in this Manual. 3. The location and placement of a masonry or conctrete screening wall shall be coordinated with the Public Works Department to avoid conflicts with utility and drainage easements. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Page 4 P & Z Minutes September 26, 1991 .~~.~T:~~~·--'--"''''' Mr. Barfield made the 0 send PZ 91-09 bac . ity Staff with E~~aug~1t!ons and re-write it and ~~oi1¡;\ør;""'S:;biing back and present it at the next ,~.i.\Jí.øt:Â/~· scheduled P & Z meeting. This motion ~~ was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the --~.____..~ ....,""'n.__'__""".-....,.'"...'Z~~~~~~-..:::~~=~c ..~~. _.......- ....... .~m........'-~ .-- PZ 91-09 TABLED 3. PS 90-30 Consideration of an amendment to Subdivision Ordinance #1579 requiring masonry screening walls along major thoroughfares. Chairman Brock said there have been several meetings on this item. He asked Mr. LeBaron to explain the history of this item. Mr. LeBaron said this issue started about a year ago. He said the Commission asked City Staff to look into what other cities were doing regarding masonry screening walls. Mr. LeBaron said he found that some cities were requiring them, some did not require them, and some had construction standards for developers if they put in screening walls. Mr. LeBaron said he had a slide show for the Commission where we looked at different types of construction of these fences. He said he took Planning and Zoning's suggestions and prepared this ordinance. He said this ordinance was then submitted to the City Council for their review and on July 22nd they asked questions regarding the way you were going to apply the requirement for masonry screening walls. Mr. LeBaron said the ordinance stated that when a subdivision is developed adjacent to a thoroughfare as shown on the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan, the development would be required to construct a masonry screening wall according to these standards. He said there was concern from the City _..- ;.~ I Page 5 P & Z Minutes 1_ September 26, 1991 I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I ~ I I Council that it was too liberal, to be more conservative in that approach, so they sent it back to P & Z for further study. Chairman Brock said there is concern that this amendment could create more problems than it would be eliminating and that was not P & Z's intention to do that. He said economics sometimes takes care of problems like this. He said we had concerns about fences that were built, that they would meet certain requirements and standards so they would not fall down after a few years. Mr. Barfield said he felt that requiring these on a C2U might be a little restrictive. He suggested changing it to require them on C4U or greater. Also in the design criteria, he suggested eliminating the column spacing. He said in the last paragraph it talks about it being designed by a professional engineer and the engineer should be able to tell if the columns need to be on 10 feet or 25 feet or what. Mr. Barfield said the requirement for a 4 inch opening along the bottom of the fence to allow storm water to pass could be arbitrary, if a fence is at the top of a grade and you have water shed both directions, you would not need water passing under the fence. He said he thinks they should put more burden on the structural engineer. Mr. Lueck said he also feels the 4 inch requirement should be left up to the engineer. Chairman Brock said paragraph 7 of the ordinance needs to be changed from a C2U to C4U or greater, but how should we deal with the sentence that deals with a distance of 400 feet. I Page 6 P & Z Minutes Ie September 26, 1991 I I I I I I .1 Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Mr. Barfield said it should state if it is a distance of more than 400 feet. Mr. LeBaron said if we are going to change the requirement to C4U, we might want to change that criteria also. He said when P & Z first started talking about this, you said that any subdivision or replat that would be adjacent to a C2U or greater would have to put a masonry screening wall along the C2U or greater. He said then they felt it might become a hardship for a small subdivision with maybe 2 lots that adjoins a thoroughfare. Mr. LeBaron said they decided that if you have one street intersection or if you extend 400 feet or more, it would be required and you would be excluding the small subdivisions. Chairman Brock said he felt if they change it to a C4U, you would need the masonry screening fence. Mr. Barfield said if it backs up to a C4U, but the entrance is off a C2U and if there is no intersection, they would not have to put up a masonry fence. He said you would probably need one or the other. Mr. LeBaron said if you are on a 4 lane or larger, whether the subdivision is one lot or 50 lots, you want it masonry. Chairman Brock said it is our intent that if a subdivision backs up to a C4U, we want it masonry if it is 100 lots or if it is 4 lots or 2 lots. Mr. Barfield said if a man owns property on a C4U and he wishes to subdivide it into one or 2 lots, he doesn't feel he should have to put up a masonry fence, but if he owns I Page 7 P & Z Minutes I Ie September 26, 1991 I I I I I I .1 Ie I I I I I I Ie I I acreage like Peachtree Estates where they actually have only 2 lots on the thoroughfare, but they have a street going back. Mr. Bowen asked if Section 107 in the Design Manual, could these be changed without a change in the ordinance. Mr. LeBaron said they could. He said those are technical engineering requirements. Mr. Barfield made the motion to send this back to City Staff to change the wording from C2U to C4U or larger; anything that has to do with column spacing and restricting the design should be deleted and put it more on the back of the structural engineer. Chairman Brock said he needs a clarification on Mr. Barfield's motion. He asked if we could approve it with these changes. Mr. Barfield said he would change his motion to approve it on C4U streets or larger. This motion was seconded by Mr. Moody. Mr. Lueck asked what the changes would be. Mr. LeBaron said paragraph 7 would read as follows: "Every newly platted subdivision or re-subdivision of existing residential lots adjacent to a C4U thoroughfare or larger as shown on the prevailing Master Thoroughfare Plan shall comply with a screening wall requirement as provided in this section". Mr. Lueck asked that Mr. LeBaron read Paragraph 7 again. Mr. LeBaron read it again. I Page 8 P & Z Minutes Ie September 26, 1991 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Mr. Barfield said if a person comes in with 2 or 3 acres on a C4U or greater and he wants to subdivide his lot into 2 lots, we need to make an exception to those people. He said it would not be fair for him to have to put up a masonry screening fence. Mr. LeBaron said the way you are designing this ordinance, if the subdivision is adjacent to a C4U whether it be one lot, 2 lots or more, that property line would have to have a screening wall. Mr. Barfield said that is what he is trying to exempt. He said we need different verbiage on that. He said it would be like the man on Douglas Lane who came in to replat his property into 2 lots. Mr. Bowen asked if it would be possible for him to escrow funds for the fence. He said he did not think they would want to put up a masonry fence on one lot, but the intent is you would eventually want a masonry screening fence there. Mr. LeBaron said anytime you have a property that is different from ,the norm, as your roll as Planning and Zoning Commission you can evaluate that and make a recommendation to the City Council based on those facts. Chairman Brock said then we could leave the ordinance the way it is written and take the one lot subdivision into consideration. Mr. LeBaron said if you want some guidelines for some exceptions, you can put something in there. Mr. Barfield said they could put that a replat of a one lot subdivision facing a collector street is exempt. I Ie I Page 9 .p & Z Minutes 'September 26, 1991 I Mr. LeBaron said the Commission has dealt with waivers and hardship cases in the past. I Ms. Marin asked Mr. Barfield if he plans to amend his motion. Mr. Barfield said he would make his motion over. I PS 90-30 APPROVED WITH CHANGES Mr. Barfield recommended approval of PS 90-30, change the verbiage on paragraph 7 to what Mr. LeBaron read and add the section that a replat of an existing one lot subdivision on a collector street is exempt. I I I -- Mr. Moody asked where do you draw the line, one lot or 2 lots. Mr. Barfield said if you have a street intersection in a subdivision. He said the intent is not to require this on every little homeowner that comes in and replats his lot. I Mr. Moody seconded the motion and the motion carried 6-0. I Chairman Brock said thi s an ordinance that the Council sent to us for revie d consideration. He said we ed at it at our last meetin we spent some time at our wor op on it. He said it is the ention of this Commission to promote Detention/Retention/Decorative Ponds in the City; they could be very attractive and a great asset to the City, but there are some concerns of the members. _ , __ _.. ~ ~__ .-.... ~:.ã.~..;:.:., - __ .::.:..~~ :!~ci:.t.dA,; I 4. PS 91-19 Consideration of an ordinance for Detention/Retention/Decorative I I I Ie I ---- - -.....----..-.---~_~ Ms. Marin said we all feel it necessary and it could work to the betterment of the City, but we need to give it more study before we make any decisions. I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date:l0/23/91 GN 91-149 Agenda Number: Subject: Property Tax Refund I I I I I I Recommendation: I The Texas Property Tax Code Section 31.11 (a) requires that refunds over $500 be approved by the governing body. The following refund requests have been received. TaXDaver Amount Reason for Refund Cal Network Properties $1,304.07 Overpayment of Tax Eu Texas Four 3,478.43 Overpayment of Tax Total $4,782.50 The tax office recommends approval of the refund as outlined above. I I Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ ~,.,J Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ /) - l21V!~~ , City Manager . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: ~dm; 11 i (::t t"~t ; n11 Council Meeting Date: 10/28/91 Subject: ~+~+-~ F1111rl;11f) -Fnr NRrr~ Agenda Number: GN 91-150 I I I I I I I We are in our second year of partial funding of Northeast Transportation Service. This service to elderly, handicapped, and poverty level income citizens has been well received. The Assistant City Manager is on the Board of NETS and monitors the program closely. The Texas Department of Transportation heard about the NETS Program and voluntarily offered funding. Their program offers a 25% match of operating expenses and a 13% match of capital costs for both federal and city funds received by NETS. The funding (grant) can only be made to a City served by the system. There would not be any liability or additional responsibility on our city's part. We would forward the money on to NETS when it is received. This can be very helpful to the NETS Program and the service it provides. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider the NETS' request for North Richland Hills to apply for the funds from the Texas Department of Transportation. I I I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other & Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available gnature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ~) ¡¿/11 ~ City anager ,Finance Director Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I fI I I I I Y:\ICÀ-\ of :\letropoÜtan fort \"orth lJrban Services YMCA ; 5342 Davis Blvd.. Ste. A :¡ Fort Worth, Texas 76180 " (817) 428-6387 October 10, 1991 '~~I ~~'TJ ~ //' Mr. Rodger Line City Manager City of N. Richland Hills PO Box 820609 N. Richland Hills, TX 76182 Dear Mr. Line: I have enclosed an application to the Texas Dept. of Transportation for Public Transportation Fund monies. This fund will provide a 25% match for NETS operating expenses, and 13% for capital equipment. Jim Cotton of the Dept. of Transportation in Austin called me to notify us of the availablity of these funds. NETS is unique in that it serves several cities, and is receiving UMTA funds through the T. The grant requires that the "applicant" be a city that is being served by the system. This is in no way as complex as the UMTA grant was, and the requirements of the applicant agency appear to be minimal. Mr. Cotton indicated that the city would probably need only to forward our expense statements and request for funds, and then forward the funds to NETS. As this is a very new program, and NETS does not exactly fit the pattern, the guidelines under which we will operate are still somewhat unclear. However, Mr. Cotton is anxious that the application be filed so that the funds can be made immediately available to NETS. It is seldom that a state agency calls to suggest that funds are available, and shows so much interest in an individual program. NETS is a prototype program, and is being watched for its effectiveness and applicability to other areas of the state. The support and cooperation of the City of N. Richland Hills has made this possible. We hope that the City will consider serving as our applicant for the Public Transportation Funds. I I If you have additional questions, please contact me at the above number, or you may wish to contact Jim Cotton at 512-483-3648. Thank you for your consideration and support. Sincerely, ~ ." C-LA..A....Å- <../ ~""7 -- C¿ Laura Bachman Program Director 10 United Way Helps Here I I -- I I I I I I I -- I I I I y~tC.:\ of :\Ietropoiitan fort \V orth Urban Services YMCA ~ 5342 Davis Blvd.. Ste. A "' Fort Worth, Texas 76180 !) (817) 428-6387 .~ \,11 //.. ' ! ~/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION NORTHEAST TRANSPORTATION SERVICE The Northeast Transportation Service was begun in March of 1991 to provide paratransit services to residents of Northeast Tarrant County who are elderly, handicapped, or very low income. The Northeast Tarrant County area is comprised of twelve cities, with a population of over 300,000. No public transportation system has been available in this area until the beginning of NETS. NETS operates lift equipped vehicles Monday through Friday, from 7 AM until 7 PM. After completing an application, riders may request services with a 24 hour notice. The fare is $1.25 per one-way trip. A 10 ten trip pass is available for $10.00. The NETS program is unique in the extensive cooperation between agencies and cities which has made the service possible. The YMCA of Metropolitan Ft. Worth, Urban Services Branch operates the service. United Way provides funding, and some funding is received through local civic groups and foundations. Of the twelve Northeast cities, seven currently participate in the NETS system. These cities provide 35¢ per resident per year. Starting October 1, 1991, an agreement with the Ft. Worth Transportation Authority allows NETS to receive UMTA Section 9 funds. This has allowed for dramatic expansion of the program, and the purchase of several vehicles. I I -- I I o United Way Helps Here ,. ~ :?'~:tfi;~}!(~:~:'~¿-\~7 .' . . ~. ,. ",' I' -. I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I I 1. 2. 3. 4. GENERAL INFORMATION Legal Name of Applicant: City of North Richland Hills Mailing Address: PO Box 820609 N. Richland Hills, TX 76182 street Aãaress (if different from above) a 7301 NE Loop 820 N. Rich1and Hils, TX Name, Title, Telepllone Number anå FAX Number ot contact Person: 5. (also: Laura1ee Bachman, YMCA Program Director. 817-428-6387) Applicant's Vendor Identification (VID) Number: . . 6. Applicant's Fiscal Year: 7. Date that application will be submitted to the urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA): UMTA Section 9 application has been submitted by the Ft. Worth Transit Authority Date Federal approval is expected: December 1991, for funding retroactive to Oct. 1, 1991 8. 9. -~ederal projeot Number (if known): TX-90-X233 10. Date PTF monies must be under contract (NOTE: Any expenses incurred before the state contract is fully executed are not reimbursable.): I If- I II I I I I I fI I I I I I I I YMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth Urban Services YMCA · 5342 Davis Blvd., Ste. A · Fort Worth, Texas 76180 · (817) 428-6387 NORTHEAST TRANSPORTATION SERVICE PROPOSED BUDGET Oct. 1, 1991 - sept. 30, ~992 Income City contributions united Way Contributions Fares section 9 Total Income Expenses Vehicle Purchase Salaries Benefits & Taxes Fees and Contracts Supplies Telephone Postage Occupancy Printing & Promotion Gasoline Repairš'- -& Maint. Misc. Vehicle Exp. & Insurance Travel Acctnq & Admin. Radio expense & Mis c. National dues Equipment Total Expense $ 86,359 25,000 5,000 15,000 182,359 $313,718 110,000 77,499 16,046 25,000 1,500 1,000 1,000 3,204 2 , 110 24,350 4,000 6,000 2,000 34,509 2,000 500 3,000 $313,718 '. It United Way Help. Her. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works GlenVlew Orlve ~anltary ~ewer ~roject Easement Acquisition - Parcel No. 4 10/28/91 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PU 91-38 On April 8, 1991, City Council approved the subject project. This action is required to purchase one of the five easements needed from homeowners fronting on Glenview Drive. The staff has acquired a temporary construction easement and a permanent sanitary sewer easement from the property of Beulah F. Conn for the subject project. Compensation for the easement is $1,000.00. All property owners are being offered $1,000.00 for the permanent easement no matter how wide the property's frontage is. Recommendation: The staff recommends Council approve payment for the permanent sanitary sewer easement along Glenview Drive to Beulah F. Conn in the amount of $1,000.00. Finance Review Source of Funds: ¡ Bonds (GO/Rev.) . Operating Budget Ott}1 x Acct. Number 02-91-04-6000 Sufficient Funds Available ~ ",~. , -/ ;e 4/1 P (,~ 4 ~anàger . Finance Director ~ Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I I, I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I. I I ¡ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF TARRANT That I, Beulah F. Conn, a widow, as Sellers, for and in consideration of the agreed purchase price of One Thousand and no/l 00 Dollars ($1,000.00), and upon all of the terms and conditions hereof hereby grant, sell and convey to the City of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation of Tarrant County, Texas, as Buyer, a perpetual easement for the purpose of constructing, using and maintaining public sanitary sewer facilities including underground conduits, said perpetual easement being shown and described on the plat attached hereto, which plat is made a part hereof, and/or further described as follows: (SEE ATTACHED PLAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION) In addition to the above described perpetual easement, Seller also hereby grants to City a temporary right of access to, and use of, lands of Seller immediately adjacent to the perpetual easement as necessary for construction of proposed facilities by normal operations. The agreed purchase price includes full accord, satisfaction and compensation for all demands of the Seller, subject also to the following special conditions, if any: To have and hold the same perpetually to the City of North Richland Hills and its successors and assigns forever. Executed this the Ill~ (k Q {;..ti , A.D., 1991. P ,Q (}il/']1.-/ day of ß J ,/ .--- -/(lI(/~ð,t ~ Beulah F. Conn SELLER ADDRESS OF GRANTEE: City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT 1-1~ This inst~~~~~~acknOwledged before me by Beulah F. Conn on this the 1\" day of LL<)~' , A.D. 1991. ~-¡.~.¡.~. -. _~vvJ- ß ~(- ~ (::,~:":\ MARK D. BRADLEY , Notary Public, state of Tex s \\:~ .:....1 MY COMM'SS:ON fJ(P:RES . Co :"',::iÆ~~~/ ~._~~ ~ 19.93 I Notary's Printed Name: 4-22-93 Mark D. Bradlev 1- KEF NO. 3-430, PARCEL NO.4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GLENVIEW DR. RELIEF SEWER It I EXHIBIT "A" I PERMANENT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT W. W. WALLACE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1606 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS I SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being a strip of land out of the W. W. Wallace Survey, Abstract No. 1606, said strip also being across a tract of land conveyed to Beulah F. Conn (Conn tract) by deed as recorded in Volume 5160 Page 351 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas (D.R.T.C.T.), and a one half interest in said Conn tract conveyed to Thomas H. Conn by deed as recorded in Volume 7271, Page 1261 D.R.T.C.T., said strip being herein described as a 10 foot wide Perma- nent Sanitary Sewer Easement as shown on the attached Exhibit "C" and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: I I BEGINNING at a point in the west property line of said Conn tract and the east property line of a tract of land conveyed to Guy W. Morse and wife Sammie R Morse (Morse tract) by deed as recorded in Volume 6688 Page 458, of the D.R.T.C.T., said point of beginning being South, 159.53 feet from the northwest corner of said Conn tract; I THENCE, South 89 degrees 57 minutes 43 seconds East, 200.7 feet to a point in the east property line of said Conn tract and the existing west right-of-way line of Keeter Drive; I THENCE, South, along the east property line of the said Conn tract and the west right-of- way line of Keeter Drive, 10.00 feet to a point; THENCE, North 89 degrees 57 minutes 43 seconds West, 200.7 feet to a point in the west property line of the said Conn tract and the east property line of the aforesaid Morse tract; Ie THENCE, North, along the west property line of said Conn tract and the east property line of said Morse tract, 10.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. I The Permanent Sanitary Sewer Easement herein described contains 0.0461 acres (2,007 square feet) of land, more or less. I TO ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN TITLE TO THE PREMISES SURVEYED, I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND FROM AN ACTUAL AND ACCURATE SURVEY UPON THE GROUND AND THAT SAME IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Company Name: Spooner and Dunn I I By: f' þ.L,; ;(,JJ~ Eddie L. Dunn I Registered Professional Land Surveyor, Texas No. 4580 Date of Survey July 1991 I I. 1- I I ' · I, I KEF NO. 3-430, PARCEL NO.4 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GLENVIEW DR. RELIEF SEWER EXHIBIT "B" I PERMANENT SANIT AR Y SEWER EASEMENT W. W. WALLACE SURVEY, ..\BSTRACT NO. 1606 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS I SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills. Tarrant County, Texas and being a strip of land out of the W. \V. Wallace Survey, Abstract No. 1606. said strip also being across a tract of land conveyed to Beulah F. Conn (Conn tract) by deed as recorded in Volume 5160 Page 351 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas (D.R.T.C.T.), and a one half interest in said Conn tract conveyed to Thomas H. Conn by deed as recorded in Volume 7271, Page 1261 D.R.T.C.T., said strip being herein described as a 20 foot wide Tempo- rary Construction Easement as shown on the attached Exhibit "C" and being more partic- ularly described by metes and bounds as follows: I I BEGINNING at a point in the west property line of said Conn tract and the east property line of a tract of land conveyed to Guy \V. l\lorse and wife Sammie R Morse (rvlorse tract) by deed as recorded in Volume 6688 Page 458, of the D.R.T.C.T., said point of beginning being South, 159.53 feet from the northwest corner of said Conn tract: I THENCE, North, with the west property line of said Conn tract and the east property line of said Morse tract, 20 feet; I THENCE, South 89 degrees 57 minutes 43 seconds East, 200.7 feet to a point in the east property line of said Conn tract and the existing west right-of-way line of Keeter Drive; THENCE, South, along the east property line of the said Conn tract and the west right-of- way line of Keeter Drive, 20.00 feet to a point; Ie THENCE, North 89 degrees 57 minutes 43 seconds West, 200.7 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. I The Temporary Construction Easement herein described contains 0.0921 acres (4,014 square feet) of land, more or less. I TO ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN TITLE TO THE PREMISES SURVEYED, I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND FROM AN ACTUAL AND ACCURATE SURVEY UPON THE GROUND AND THAT SAME IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Company Name: Spooner and Dunn I I By: Ut;. t ß~ Eddie L. Dunn I Registered Professional Land Surveyor, Texas No. 4580 Date of Survey July 1991 I I, .¡ I I I' I, I I I I I I I þÞJ I I I I I I I ~ I I SURVEY: 'N. W. WALLACE. A-1606 LOCA TION '. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS EASEMENT ACQUISITION: TEMPORARY: 0.0921 AC. PERMANENT: 0.0461 AC. W'HOLE PROPERlY ACREAGE : 0.834 AC. KEF NO.3-430, PARCEL NO. 4 GLENVlEW DRIVE REUEF SEVIER EXHIBIT "e" DRAWING OF EXHIBITS n An & "8" CIll' OF NORTI-i RICHLAND HILLS P.O.8. BOX 820609 NORTI-i RICHLAND HILLS TX. 76182 / #I \~I \ /1.. .' r w. W. WALLACE A-16G6 BEULAH F. CONN VOL 5160 PG. 351 D.R. T.C. T. THOMAS H. CONN VOL. ì271 PG. 1261, D.R.T.C.T. o èõ w U') ~ o ::: a co ~ ci ~ 2: ~r-: (j")Ü ~ t::æ :;0 005 ZlO <t::~ ~c.:) c::a.. °ce ~<X) .CD ~<.O >-.J :::JO e» EXHIBIT "8" I PROPOSED 20 FOOT 'NlDE ¡TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ! 0.0921 ACRES (4,014 SQ. FT.) I I s: ~ ~ Q ~ o x 't") ~U") :;0) -to >-~ r- rv ~ o ;¡;: -l. CD BRICK AND FRAME HOUSE ~ 0:: ~9' 7 U") ~ ~~ : w ~ .~ E-4 ~tf i ~ I~ i~ i>' I. ~. 0 I 1r:1 c, ... ~ I I I I~ l C r ~ I 0 CD I < I WM CD S.89·57'43~ __~~~_~OO.L__ I o 6" lREE CWAìtR H,(! RANT, '*dJ I I · 62 2+" ELM 0'\ ~ II N I I I 1,~ ^ N \ 0 I S 9·57' 43"E. ---I ¡ -.-..- . OO~ \ en I ~ ZQQ.1' --=1- ~ I ---H.89:5D-3"-YL- · 11 47' CABLE BARRIER ~ J ¡ , . I I R CABLE BARRIER , (".LW~ WAJIt CONC. \3c 11.34' c:d GLENVIEW DRIVE I EXHIBIT "A" PROPOSED 1 0 FOOT 'MDE PERMANENT SANITARY SE'NER EASEMENT 0.0461 ACRES (2.007 SQ. FT.) : < : ~ ~ rz1 ~ Ó ~ REVISED 9-23-91 m SPOONER & DUNN REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS JOB NO.: 7-91-138 DATE: 8-15-91 COGO FILE: 7 91 138 ACAD F1LE: 138-4 DRAWN BY: E.L.D. COMPUTED BY: S.G.S. CHECKED BY: E.LD. (817) 282-6981 i: ~ -c o U) o :E Q. < i 1 "=40' ~ ~)3~ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .epartment: Subject: Pllhli~ Work~/ntilities Glenview Drive Sanitary Sewer Project - E~~~mønr nr~l;~;r;nn - PAr~~l No.5 Council Meeting Date: 10/28/91 Agenda Number: PU 91-39 I ~ e On April 8, 1991, City Council approved the subject project. This action is required to purchase one of the five easements needed from homeowners fronting Glenview Drive. The staff has acquired a temporary construction easement and a permanent sanitary sewer easement from the property of Jack and Peggy Hybarger for the subject project. Compensation for the easement is $1,000.00. All property owners are being offered $1,000.00 for the permanent easement no matter how wide the property·s frontage is. Recommendation: The staff recommends Council approve payment for the permanent sanitary sewer easement along Glenview Drive to Jack and Peggy Hybarger in the amount of $1,000.00. . Finance Review - . Finance Director Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) e Operating Budget Othe ---X- City Manager t Head Signature CIT.Y COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I Ie I SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF TARRANT I That we, Jack A. Hybarqer and wife, Peggy S. Hvbarqer, as Sellers, for and in consideration of the agreed purchase price of One Thousand and nO/lOa Dollars ($1,000.00), and upon all of the terms and conditions hereof hereby grant, sell and convey to the City of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation of Tarrant County, Texas, as Buyer, a perpetual easement for the purpose of constructing, using and maintaining public sanitary sewer facilities including underground conduits, said perpetual easement being shown and described on the plat attached hereto, which plat is made a part hereof, and/or further described as follows: I (SEE ATTACHED PLAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION) I In addition to the above described perpetual easement, Seller also hereby grants to City a temporary right of access to, and use of, lands of Seller immediately adjacent to the perpetual easement as necessary for construction of proposed facilities by normal operations. I The agreed purchase price includes full accord, satisfaction and compensation for all demands of the Seller, subject also to the following special conditions, if any: I To have and hold the same perpetually to the City of North Richland Hills and its successors and assigns forever. Executed this the f 1 t" day of (jc~ /JA , A.D., 1991. I Ie SELLERS I ADDRESS OF GRANTEE: City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 I STATE OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF TARRANT I wife, Peqgy I Notary's Printed Name: 4-22-93 Mark D. Bradley I Ie I I I KEF NO. 3-430, PARCEL NO.5 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND mLLS GLENVIEW DR. RELIEF SEWER Ie I EXHIBIT to A" PERMANENT SANIT AR Y SEWER EASEMENT W. W. WALLACE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1606 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS I SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being a strip of land out of the W. W. Wallace Survey, Abstract No. 1606, said strip also being across a tract of land conveyed to Jack A. Hybarger and wife, Peggy S. Hybarger (Hybarger tract) by deed as recorded in Volume 4162 Page 323 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas (D.R.T.C.T'), said strip being herein described as a 10 foot wide Permanent Sanitary Sewer Easement as shown on the attached Exhibit "C" and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: I I BEGINNING at a point in the west property line of said Hybarger tract and the east right-of- way line of Keeter Drive, said point of beginning being South, 159.69 feet from the north- west corner of said Hybarger tract; I THENCE, South 89 degrees 57 minutes 43 seconds East, 27.98 feet to a point at the begin- ning of a curve to the right whose center bears South 00 degrees 02 minutes 17 seconds West, 307.54 feet; I THENCE, easterly along said curve to the right through a central angle of 08 degrees 04 minutes 31 seconds, and an arc length of 43.34 feet to a point at the end of said curve and the beginning of a curve to the left whose center bears North 08 degrees 06 minutes 48 seconds East, 297.54 feet; I Ie THENCE, easterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 03 degrees 07 minutes 45 seconds and an arc length of 16.25 feet to a point in the east property line of said Hybarger tract and the west property line of a tract of land conveyed to Earl D. Region and wife, Oleta L. Region <Region tract) by deed recorded in Volume 7668 Page 412, of the D.R.T.C.T.; I THENCE, South, along the east property line of the said Hybarger tract and the west proper- ty line of said Region tract, 10.04 feet to a point on a curve to the right whose center bears North 04 degrees 49 minutes 19 seconds East, 307.54 feet; I THENCE, westerly along said curve to the right through a central angle of 03 degrees 17 minutes 30 seconds, and an arc length of 17.67 feet to a point at the end of said curve and the beginning of a curve to the left whose center bears South 08 degrees 06 minutes 48 seconds West, 297.54 feet; I THENCE, westerly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 08 degrees 04 minutes 31 seconds, and an arc length of 41.94 feet to a point at the end of said curve; I THENCE, North 89 degrees 57 minutes 43 seconds West 27.98 feet to a point in the west property line of the said Hybarger tract and the east right-of-way line of the afore- said Keeter Drive; THENCE, North, along the west property line of said Hybarger tract and the east right-of- way line of said Keeter Drive, 10.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. I The Permanent Sanitary Sewer Easement herein described contains 0.02 acres (876 square feet) of land, more or less. I TO ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN TITLE TO THE PREMISES SURVEYED, I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND FROM AN ACTUAL AND ACCURATE SURVEY UPON THE GROUND AND THAT SAME IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Ie I Company Name: Spooner and Dunn I Registered Professional Land Surveyor, Texas No. 4580 BY:V~~h'~ Eddie L. Dunn Date of Survey July 1991 I KEF NO. 3-430, PARCEL NO.5 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GLENVIEW DR. RELIEF SEWER Ie I EXHIBIT "B" TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT W. W. WALLACE SURVEY, .-\BSTRACT NO. 1606 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS I I SITUATED in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being a strip of land out of the W. W. Wallace Survey, Abstract No. 1606, said strip also being across a tract of land conveyed to Jack A. Hybarger and wife, Peggy S. Hybarger (Hybarger tract) by deed as recorded in Volume 4162 Page 323 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas (D.R.T.C.T.), said strip being herein described as a 20 foot wide Temporary Con- struction Easement as shown on the attached Exhibit "C" and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: I BEGINNING at a point in the west property line of said Hybarger tract and the east right- of-way line of Keeter Drive, said point of beginning being South, 159.69 feet from the northwest corner of said Hybarger tract; I THENCE, North, with the west property line of said Hybarger tract and the existing east right-of-way line of Keeter Drive, 20.0 feet; I THENCE, South 89 degrees 57 minutes 43 seconds East. 28.0 feet to a point at the begin- ning of a curve to the right whose center bears South 00 degrees 02 minutes 17 seconds West, 327.54 feet; I Ie THENCE, easterly along said curve to the right through a central angle of 08 degrees 04 minutes 31 seconds, and an arc length of 46.16 feet to a point at the end of said curve and the beginning of a curve to the left whose center bears North 08 degrees 06 minutes 48 seconds East, 277.54 feet; THENCE, easterly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 02 degrees 46 minutes 06 seconds and an arc length of 13.41 feet to a point in the east proper- ty line of said Hybarger tract and the west property line of a tract of land con- veyed to Earl D. Region and wife, Oleta L. Region (Region tract) by deed record- ed in Volume 7668 Page 412, of the D.R.T.C.T.; I THENCE, South, along the east property line of the said Hybarger tract and the west property line of said Region tract, 20.08 feet to a point on a curve to the right whose center bears North 04 degrees 59 minutes 03 seconds East, 297.54 feet; I THENCE, westerly along said curve to the right through a central angle of 03 degrees 07 minutes 45 seconds, and an arc length of 16.25 feet to a point at the end of said curve and the beginning of a curve to the left whose center bears South 08 degrees 06 minutes 48 seconds West, 307.54 feet; I THENCE, westerly along said curve to the left through a central angle of 08 degrees 04 minutes 31 seconds, and an arc length of 43.34 feet to a point at the end of said curve; I THENCE, North 89 degrees 57 minutes 43 seconds West 27.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. I The Temporary Construction Easement herein described contains O.04acres (1,752 square feet) of land, more or less. I TO ALL PARTIES INTERESTED IN TITLE TO THE PREMISES SURVEYED, I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND FROM AN ACTUAL AND ACCURATE SURVEY UPON THE GROUND AND THAT SAME IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Company Name: Spooner and Dunn Registered Professional Land Surveyor, Texas No. 4580 Ie I By: &u; 6. f}~ Eddie L. Dunn I Date of Survey July 1991 I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I SURVEY: W. W. WALLACE, A-1606 LOCAll0N·. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS EASEMENT ACQU1Sl1l0N : TEMPORARY: 0.04 AC. PERMANENT: 0.02 AC. WHOLE PROPERTf ACREAGE : 0.3643 AC. KEF NO.3-430, PARCEL NO. 5 Gl£NV1EW DRIVE REUEF SEVIER EXHIBIT "Cft DRAW\NG OF EXHIBITS "Art & "8" CITY OF NORlli RICHLAND HILLS P.O.B. BOX 820609 NORTI-i RICHLAND HILLS TX. 76182 ~ ...... ~ o ~ ~ ~ t:1 ~ 1J:1 .. ~ < rn E-t ..... ~ ~ rz1 ~ . o 0.: / W. 'vV. \NALLACE SURVEY I' \ \ A-1606 JACK A. HYBARGER AND wtFE PEGGY S. HYBARGER VOL. 4162 PG. 323, D.R.T.C.T. EXHIBIT "8" êx> ¡ PROPOSED 20 FOOT WIDE N I TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMrnT <XJ I 0.04 ACRES (1,752 SQ. FT.) J: I I ' z· H ACKBERR ~ ~_ ~8~~rr·_ J_ 2:.=~.~' _ _ R~27.54· /. ~ \ 28.0 \' fA=- 81)4-J,· - - - - -t- - c":,, J \ S.OO"\)Z'17·W. I L-- N....·S9·03·E. ~ \ RADIAL UNE N.S·06' 48"E. I to ¡RADIAL UNE \ ~¡ I RADIAL UNE¡ ~ \, f $.89'57' 4& : L=~4' R=30'.I N.4·49', 9-E. 27.98' \ - - --224 ~ lOB· , RADIAL UNE '2 \ I 1 /Á = 8·04'31·~ - . ~ N.~·43·W. Ll=41.94' R=297 , I ~ :\ ~ 27~98' "," HACK~Y - -d-4 --+-; ~ ~ ~ CONC. ~ r- .89·24'03"W. ~ R.O.W. 87.33' I to N Ci3 r- BRICK HOUSE 7925 s: o .:i m to (j') \,() ~ " " " ""-- "~ "" "" ¡ 'J GRA VEL DRIVE J' CONC. W AL.K EXHIBIT "A" PROPOSED 1 0 FOOT WIDE PERMANENT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 0.02 ACRES (876 SQ. FT.) ~ ò ~ N ~ en o :E ~ ~ 1 "=20' o SPOONER & DUNN REGISlERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS JOB NO.: 7-91-138 DATE: 8-16-91 COGO FILE: 7 91 138 ACAD FILE: 138-5 DRAWN BY: E.LD. COMPUTED BY: S.G.S. CHECKED BY: E.LD. (817) 282-6981 "'..q- CD ~ CD G LENVIEW ~ ~ i: ~ <5 !# I t- => o (J') -i J...... (3 ~J...: !:i~ o cJ" kl rv" !i: ..... ~ ~ Q c.; ~~ ~q, ~(g è3" l.ij . Q:ff c' .:s ~ ~ ~ >- ~ a::: l.&J a.. o 0::: a.. A = CUR'Æ R = 307.54' L = 1 7.67' = 3"7'30· B = CURVE R = 297.54' L = 16.25' = J'07' 45- C = CURVE R = 277.5~' L = 13.4" = 2·46'06- "" ? ~ DRIVE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works streets to be Resurfaced under the 1992 County Program _ Council Meeting Date:10/28/91 Agenda Number: PW 91-32 County Commissioner Bob Hampton has requested the City send in their list of streets we desire to be resurfaced by the county crews in 1992. Though Industrial Park Boulevard West is scheduled to begin November 1, 1991 and has its own budget, we have included it as the top priority on the following list. The staff recommends the following streets be approved. 1. Industrial Park Boulevard West; Loop 820 northeast to the existing deadend south of Browning Drive (2,016 feet). * Cardinal Lane; Grapevine Hwy. west and north for 1,600 feet (1,600 feet). Lynda Lane; Davis Blvd. east to Tiffin Drive (400 feet). Valley View Drive; Crane Road to Martin Drive (1,200 feet). Mickey street; Smithfield Road east to deadend (1,000 feet). stewart street; Stmmons Rd. east to Chilton Drive (900 feet). Walter street; Amundson Dr. south and west to Cliff street (1,100 feet). Cliff street; Amundson Drive southeast to Walter street (400 feet). Hewitt street; Briardale Drive west to Meadow Road (1,600 feet). Hewitt street; Chapman Drive north and west for 900' (900 feet). College Circle; Watauga Road south and east for 800' (800 feet). 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.a. b. 8. 9. 10. * This segment of Cardinal Lane is being accomplished in accordance with an agreement with AEGON. AEGON is reimbursing the City for a portion of the cost of the surface treatment of the street (2" asphalt). The reconstruction by the County of the streets listed as No. 2 through 10 should not cost more than $60,000. It should be noted that Industrial Park Boulevard is now scheduled to begin in late 1991. A reasonable expectation would be that priority 2 through 4 could be accomplished by the County during 1992. Funding Source: Currently, monies are budgeted in the General Fund CIP under "1990/91 County Overlay Program". These funds can be relabeled "1991/92 County Overlay Program". Recormnendation: The staff recommends Council approve the above noted streets for the 1992 County resurfacing program. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Oth~r . Finance Director GO 13-60-87-6000 s Available ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of I -- I I I I I I I f' I I I I I I Ie I I ......... .. COU'a.W! .. ...~~ ~"~"...... i·D:~m~~ :~ ~ >= ~~ ~~iJ 0: ... .... .. .. ... .. ....:..":. ...... BOB HAMPTON COUNTY COMMISSIONER PRECINCT NO.3 TARRANT COUNTY NORTHEAST GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 645 GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY HURST, TEXAS 76054 (817) 581-3600 :"" September 24, 1991 \ J. \- \----.~ ."..,- -~...----' ". - \...............-~ .",.... Honorable Mayor Tommy Brown city of North Richland Hills P. o. Box 820609 No. Richland Hills, Texas 76182-0609 Dear Mayor Brown: During my tenure, Precinct Three has assisted cities in the repair and reconstruction of streets within their incorporated area. Again, this year we are asking the city Councils of Precinct Three to establish their priorities for projects in which county assistance is required. As is in the past, our first priority in this cooperative effort will be work on thoroughfares and major collectors. At the present time, we have projects scheduled through the end of the present fiscal year and the beginning of the next fiscal year. All requests from Precinct Three cities will be reviewed. and scheduled based on our workload. You will be contacted regarding the estimated costs for the work requested and an interlocal agreement will be prepared as we approach a "start date" for your project. As in the past, you may wish to purchase materials for this county assistance program at our contract prices. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me or my staff. Yours truly, -y~ Bob Hampton County Commissioner Precinct Three BH/mq I -- I I I I I I I f' I I I I I I -- I I _:.1 uN r1 , ~'r - .. ; I / .-:. -. ~,""I - '~p /y" "/ j -$~~~ l-J I I~,'~ ~ to, I-~: ~P1~ ' .. I 0- . , HW.lð.U~ I I ~: - 4·..... ~. _ 1>. I ~ ~ ~~ - -l § '/ ',..,c/O.'·' -'1" ~t .../ A' . . / '~:'< l---;-i /";/ ~ __..l___Ì-! h /'> ----. I [ _ I tJj i / ././ -------:,~-.- _,. : I",. ,;1~1· ., , . -" - -..- ·'Io.fO' Ø.I~L n ¡ I. /. / ~ Î; 1;; ----¡ r--1L I ¡I;; .---.J --.L..J, L_~-~ ---., I I L--J : ~ j' I <jï;/ /ND~#J4l- ,¡,~ - ~l\' .,', PLvD. WE~r ~ r ./ ~ / I /1,' /'" L- _ l:..-/ 'SrA1& Hwy LDÐp 8Zo ... - /: -~.1 I I; I I j /. /-/-1 ".".. no.. I!! ,//, . / 1 I: -~.._ 1':' .- ,.' , ' ! ~~.... ~~~ '" ~ !;z.ì!. '( ',' · ~ ~~ ~¡ A 1 AI=: J'L I" ~ti 't ¿o' -_/ ' r~' '..\ ,,'; - ~~ ~_~~ I II ¡ I-*" I _ ~_ L~H~ l I ~ 1 Ä ..-' .' .. /-"-, ~//~'" -':/'~' ~ .,.- ," .¿._---- _-= !!!.~ j "r \[. .. . --- . ."" ir-::;" .;. ~~-~ .. ~ / -~-;: =r \.liu ~ I: . '-......~ - I: . - ;. .,.. . , :::::::: ~ ::Crï~:r u .0'" ..( WL · 'D , [' .. . . --~~. ',,< ~ / I ~~ ]-F~ Þ-- A T ß..J JY"'O" ",.(;.. ',' Þ40J.. J _ o . . . . . ,.\ V I I ¡ ¡ ""- r- I ~ .. '~:5\... ')\1 II ~~ I I IE '- f '<' T : ::::: 11 --=- r---..l I I L-: "\. , ' J. --." J ,- ~H I L · , . '.' == Ii[ H I 1:: = "'. Á(Z '.-L I .... -- "1" .,.. j ftf I 1= :: ~ ~ I I: I'll . · c~~/Inl , :=~T'O'~I' ""'-\ 1 I I 1::;,.: , 1 : 1 I';"'; M~ ; rf,}3;::: ~~ / ..- 11 H ~~ir ~.,,'": '. III \ I B~- - ------ .. L -~ I-- I-~..t-- T ¡ i I 1 ~ t:: ::~'~t-- 1 I i ~ I I I ' 'or '''1& ~ :=;ËË~µ 'T~ þ, ~ -J FA tit uJ t± J, C .__ ~II I ì'l j,r=;=r:<1 _ ~,~ll U~ ~~-~~~~êI~,I, II : :.. 1;~1..¡ñ;~II'llll'1111 '- \ .-'\ '. . · '0-L l I I I I I"J I I I , I UJ I I T -:~ '\/ \~~' '." ,~=~, ~ï'! I i!l, !!IIIP: !: ..~....rR= /\, '.. 0. :' I[ r , I I ... '..... , . ' JI, : J,-'""\ /' I , I I .~ .--- I I -- --- , I ,-_. -- ,- :, ü ÿ 0 g ~ . ! -, I N \ ' ~ r-- - Ú,1Z-DIHAL LANE / " \, \ . \ \ I : :/ , I fll 1 1!iI ;~ '2: ~ /"~,, / '~~\~ / ~ // v / '" ..... ~~... +' r /-4, ~-II ---=.- ....---. :----- .~-.,.-- _.:~: {7. ~- ~- .' .>.~~: ."'- ... h'._ " .... _ , :·'~~i;~;<~--" - lllJ ~= rrnao ~_t- i-- J }¡it ~ lllJ~- ~ ~M )~~ LLII II ~ ~ U - ~'T:I~il.iJ~ , ,-U-~T.W- R "~'"c- r.~!', B '~~ 1~8 ~RlfI I~ ~ I I -~= L----- I - [ ~ ~¡... ~m , ;:: ::~ loW ,.,_ -~~-' '---I - ~ - - '- I ""'tJ: ~~" G. " " \~ :::¡ <It J ---I .. ~~ ~.. ~~ / ,~ ~::::~- , ~o- ~' ~ ,0. '~4. ___ _ _ \\1 ~~l \ 1 ' (J,;;/ :; -:; ~ ~ \~ .U ì ì ~ ~ T T1 ~ ' I 4f ~ ~ ~ ~ ' -: 1 ~ Tì I ' , l ~ \ L , ~ _~ ~ ~ ~ â \~T J. 'I ~ Tr. J.ßJ...£ ~-8~f' \ - , 'i : ~~ i' , r, I , , ' : ',~~.-ld I ! ..l. ~ .. I ,. /~: -, , _ L_.....) ~,~_ ~ T ~~;::OO i ~ll' . !_~~~".~___. ~a¡vt ,J _ '-Hrr:;o-- -r---, L-J ~ i' I ,I I 1:1' ", _ -" p ~-E~ ~ - :.-. ~ ' I ¡ I ~ I \T~ ~ r~~~JF-- __ ,_ I (¡ ~'-~~rf ::::1 I:~.¡¡...~I§ ~ · rr f- r Ii:' I .... I, ~tt f. ~'\ : -' ~ '---' _, 'h;;r¡~~ II~II ¡ l~ 11, I t ~ C 'TNO.""'., ~ k · I '::.-j- LR-1= ~ ~ -j!-=-=~_ "--.-nõ1\",~> _. 1- r~~~ ~ I ~ - J L-_qt:__ !r~-~- ~ I -----~ I ' / / ".m - I . NORICH PAR,..'. A..... '& /. r t -....t~ ~ ..,....-r , '-'~ ~ _ /" ~ :-1rI TID !I I 1. /.) / ~E3:J /. . / / . ¡~ji: .....'ê n~~- '-', ~.. ¿~ ~ ~? H ;,.¡" /<-.. - ¡~= ~~~ ~K~:=~ : '"-' ~ /\ \ ~ _ C = H/f"J-j i/ :" _ I "" r-[11 1 '\ -~~, /' ~ i-- -~þ; I :: ì =:~':: ,i '. t=B ì .. - --aJ In = r-J l:!i v / f--l rl l.L I ----J -=z E3i 'I I ¡:::-r; !~ ~ I x:r:L -m. l:::::----'J ,1 I I I --mrr I I I.. n-;~ U ~HIt~~ ¡~ _ I / / .' I~I Ifi I 1 ~~ I L_I~'- . ~LJ:::]I j ~ I:::tm~ y~ _ _ (' _ Î '.--.t HOLIDAY ~ I '--J ~ : ~ ¡ ¡ I-I I m1 ~ ~:'\ . - l:::" T ."'.TS :I -;.H j _ " ~ . / ElE" I 'I ¡ I ~ t- I n!' ! 'j I . /. --:\~ II~ , ~r I '~¡\ ,w,ol : I ì J~n::: I ~~' .~ ~ _-~ ~IV ¡ )~. I¡ - 1 I I lJ t'-.. II I I I J. ~ ........¡ I t: '';''L'. _- '~/ . - 'c'. 1 UJ ~.... - r-1 tT:l Lï:j1~L.l:DI~ J Ë ~~ , ,,~ J~ (' ::,. tr:::J CD >-1, n J c-1.r , J r 1 ~ --' - ~ ~ . ... , ,J . · I 1 -', o--I~ J=t:i=jl-H ~ -L ~ ::: ~r . I >- ~ I - I t:= ~ ) . ~-~...~~,.:,.#~ '~ v ~ ,- ~ E ->- ~I -'- )/ A 8--,- >-_ >- I- \~i_g~s~ Î ~~ "/~~/" ~~bt:-~~- -~1 . -:I /,\ \ \ \>, .- ~ I ~~ ----~=. - ~~-~ ,,jJüO~~ ~.:. ":'~n~~ t-E - -0 .' \ ~ J I : I~.r--- : 1 . Ii: ,'" } f - i /' ~-=~-- ~ -..I i¡lil.¡!.__" - ~/' J ¡-,/-'~r--., ' -- I ~ ~ '-'- ~ (" , r I I ~ - ~ e-r:-,. -r(\..J ., -_.~ It: . cj--.U-I V ~ ¡ I il I' µ ~ ': ,a .. ... a "'t I. L~-...... - --- ~!r-= ' I ~~~ L, '_.' ~D ~:! - ~~_~ 'I .-t ' .- Ll.>:' I I-~ f::/., ~::"J~~4 ~~ ~: HJ ;b H---C=: r--r' , ' ~'- ~---. ~!lV s I' j :--1- --t::; - .L- -= ~~"I . , : 1=1= ITTIî1îS I j , '1~~..I I ~ I '~, - T, ' ," , ii=:' ", w. " ~ ,Ii -f.-lilll - 1..0, Q~-, '~~-, ,,A \,~~-.,/ ~,...? 1 ,'I " ,~ ~tj~r~~ ,'/ ~;~~. I :~; · ~¡:; m' '~"ªÿ/ /~=;i?~ =i . ,: l 'b ts "~/,- - / / ~~~ c::-~" =--= , ' j.~, / --i--'-'<,s:~-- Il~~~~~~~. //' ~-:~~-~ ~~-< it·,,/ / ,q~ ,~ , r I tt I \ ¡ , : ,.~J'I I~ / I I ~ I ! , I ~~ \~- ---'\~W .-i--L ,,~ : rL= ¿U~~ ~~ N WAl.-1É;e ~7'1Zé£-r ) ~ ; \ .... . ,.. \ ._-~ , -. ! I . -. I I _.u ~ r---¡ ,~ ¡ r--- /. {/// . ?' ///',' ..~ /. /' " ./ "".,/" ~-~.~.:/,/ / . -~~., ,. -..,. ~_.._~~ " . ~t.::: ~_..: r ~....' \./' ''/ ,../ , . , ...., '.' . \./:A'<'. ' .__: I 0 \' ':'",:/\ v -<.< .>'-- '"\ .. I I ! ~. f' '''''·W' ~r 'II I /,,\v ~ .J' \- '. ....¡ I ~ý<-< ....... . rì . - -, ::µ-;'-..J{-- :-~- J ~ _~'- ~~ ~ -- ---~ A, , ~ . ::.. ~..!.~.!~_. ~___ t- _~__. ~ ~ . _~ I ~ , _ "~J~. 1 \_ . . --- ~ . --+--,' 2-..J . I ~1t0Øt , ACt...--f , ~ J4_ n!l! ~~ .., )" - ~ r 1 f , ~-----,..-. ~ \ . 1 ~_ ~1 if! j _ ~ ~ if±(, .4-:-. ~_. - "7*".II~L U~~{L - ~, - - ~ ~--+ I -----7"'. /' ","T ¡ ~~ I ~~~-'l~~ilii±b:J'~"! 00,", . '~~"ú~Ê~t~'~T~~-~'~~j~] i":~ I < ·/f c.=.~ ~-rR1+w· ~1¡t~·:t~-~~:;r~~- B±iBfËB" ,. · - '~~C:'- .... -~. ~. .....~/'" --- ~1 ~~ 'f" ~ , ~r' .r~' /jÞ~....--- J _ V' - I : ~~ r- t:t ~ ~~ ' . I .0 . MAIN ') -1fF~ I . ,;¡. .~ f~ ! I , 1Þ1.J¡ , . '" .'Ii I" ' ) I! I ~. ¡~ 1~_ ' . . -' ¡h ¡ : ~ J >- i.""""""': c::: " /, l, t I SM. , ."" 0 < I r} ~--..: _---t __ ___:r-- ...:.:: 1 ~UNIO· ÞfIGM ~C..OOl ~4=-- :::;::;~~ a 1':'/ ----~--; ~-n--{~~~~r- ~ --¡ I J : /1 ~i \ ~-rewA¡z.r ~ ~¡ / I , ,!---' L..- i J -~ t ~ --- -----... 8 ~ : i ~~~-~ ' ,. x;, ' , ":"'> , ,._~~:--' ".' r-::¡-¡- I' .j ,,:"'>- '~.; :-+-;....;~-~ , i· -- ~ ' :) ...\. '. .(;.. ~-:~_. , I , ' " " ~'f. '!I- T~" --.\__ __~ ~_ · ).! .\\ \'2( J-,-~'~;." - B~" .~>;=s~~~]'~;~~ iN ÞA'f.'i. . _~... ¡ ~ _ __._____ ). ~ .,1 , · -., r--J-- ~ .....' J ,t ,.It: " ,; ~-.: _ ~ ~! ,~...~t-Jt " . . -~~i 2:t=:~.¡ : ~. ~:-}- - -:. -:E t t . _. . . . ,:.J-i '-'~'---4--~: t--.~ ~ ~ ~,:r -1,.' ~,.~c.t::, t-=:----.-___~ :, ~~~' --.. , -~' ~~!;-- , , --r---' _. ~.: ,;, ~~' ---., , , I ']t1·,:~ r=:-----~ ¡ ~ J:.'~'~~'~~~-¡~~~~-:!:n::---_' , _~ I ~ ;.,~. ~ ì J I ~~~~§B ~ Fflê;N': Hfl~; Ie j' / .~ .... I ----L._.._ _. ---4 ~ ~n._ t ~-____ I c¡ ~ -f;.~-_. - -fat (), ~--_.~-_.-.._._.-: - - I j ....-.... - -- -..---- ~ '"~ Hew,TY "SrÆ.lE.£T I I ~I .- -- ._~-~- ~ S, 'it, ~¡ ~ r'h -~~r-' ---.. ~i ¡ I~, ~,. ....>\4...J..,/." ~_...¡ \ "~" I "l:Ei t=:; ~'v, ,i...~~~" .',':,¡.""~~> I ., ,j' '//:... . ., "" " -.,....~). ,I ':-:3 :Ar;¡~I~AL - ,_. I W I C 1/l.GI..£ ~ ~ . ~·_.-Jv . \",,~,\. ~ » (~~... .. ~~ I . I ...; L---¡ ~,- .....,....., ~ ~.. ./~ ~/ "-.-~ I I ~I -~! I~ " ~ ~ o c ! .-, i ~ í ã o ~ -----. --... -- .----: ~..~,. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .Department: Public Works ~ Award of Bid on Rufe Snow Drlve Subject: Synchronizated Signal Systems . C ·1 M . D 10/28/91 _ ouncl eetlng ate: Agenda Number: _PW 91-33 Bids were received on the subject project October 10, 1991 and the low bidders are shown below: Bidder Amount Calendar Days Durable Specialties Arjang Electric Sig-Op Systems $ 69,110.00 $ 94,697.40 $103,338.00 90 90 90 The grant application had budgeted $118,300.00 for the synchronized system construction costs. The City must award the project, pay the contractor monthly, and then immediately request reimbursement by the State. Funding Source: No funds have been budgeted to cover the $69,110.00 for construction. The City will probably be out no more than $30,000 for a 45 day period. The temporary funding may be provided with General CIP Funds and a receivable account set up for funds to be received from the Texas Highway Department. e Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council award the subject project to Durable Specialties in the amount of $69,110.00 for a period of 90 calendar days and approve the funding as indicated above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) e Operating Budget Oth nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM .. Finance Director d Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Barton-Aschman Associat.s, Inc. 5485 Belt Line Road, Suite 199 Dallas, Texas 75240 USA '"D'Œ © [g D~~_ ~ t I~) Phone: (214) 991-1900 Fax: (214) 490-9261 Metro: 263-9138 J - October 11, 1991 Mr. John A. Johnston, P.E. Assistant Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182 RE: Bid Evaluation - Rufe Snow Signal System BA No. 3899.01.03 Dear Mr. Johnston: We have reviewed the subject bid proposal~ that were submitted on October 1 0, 1 991 for traffic signal system control improvements along Rufe Snow Drive. Bid proposals were received from Sig-Op Systems, Inc. of Edmond, Oklahoma, Arjang Electric Systems, Inc. of Dallas, Texas, Durable Specialties, Inc. of Duncanville, Texas, and Sharrock Electric, Inc. of . Dallas, Texas. Sig-Op Systems proposed to use Econolite signal system equipment, Sharrock Electric proposed Eagle equipment, and both Arjang Electric and Durable Specialties proposed Winko-Matic/Multisonics equipment. Each submitted bid appears to be in order and the proposed equi'pment either meets or · exceeds t~e specification requirements. Table A presents a summary of the unit and total bid prices. Table B presents the average bid prices received. The low bid proposal of $69,110.00 by Durable Specialties is substantially below the second low bid proposal of Arjang Electric by $25,587.40. ..{'t- - Since the bid proposal submitted by Durable Specialties is substantially lower than the others and the proposed signal system equipment meets or exceeds the project requirements, it is our recommendation that the bid proposal be accepted for contract negotiations contingent upon a favorable demonstration of the system equipment and favorable recommendations from current users of the proposed. signal system equipment. yo ~ [6J I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Mr. John A. Johnston, P.E. October 11, 1991 Page 2 I will contact Durable Specialties and Winko-Matic/Multisonics to set up a system demonstration. I will also contact current users of the system equipment and provide you with a summary of their comments. If additional information or discussion is needed to facilitate your efforts, please let us know. Sincerely, BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. £)ntH¿q~ Donald R. Glenn, P.E. Senior Associate DRG:rmb encl. cc: Mr. Jimmy Cates Public Works Superintendent don~ohnetn 10.11 ..,... _.- " " I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I ., :E .~;-_. W t- tn >- tn ..JCJ) ~~ C!J.... ~ü)u) <w::l 1~3:8 ::) a:c 1- øCz.... e ~ :s c¡» CD 0:3:1 IZS2CX) < øa:C') w wJ:d ~ u..~z ! æi~ o~~aaaaaaaaaaaa~~aaaaaaaa. 0 ~~-~~~I~~~~~_~~~~i~!i~~~iœ ~ uua UUUaN~~U_~ _ __u w -- ~ ~~ 888888888888~~888888888 ~~ §i§a~~!~~i~~~~~~!~~~i_m ø ~;* -~~~~~ 0 ø~ 88888888888888888888888 Ô~-~~~ã~~~-~_~~~~i_ëi~~~~§ ~ N ~ N~~~œ~~~~~ ~ ~~~ n - - --*-~--**~.. *** v .._ Øæ i~2 aaaaa~aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa c~~-§~~ª~aª~§~~~__~~a~a~;~§ m~ Ñ--- -~~~~~ - ~c - ----*- ~ ~~aaaaa~aaaaaa~aaa~aaaaaa ~Q~-~~iã~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~ä~i§ 8~ ~~~ NNN~m~NN~N N- ~ ~ 0 5 -*- _*_~~_**_N" -- ~ --- w ~2~aaaa~~aáaaaa~~~~~~~~aaa Q ~~ ~~g8~a~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~§ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~oo--- _ _ __ c ~--- -Ñ~~ÑÑ 0 - ----* ~ ~88888888888~8888888888 ~ ....................... ~~-m~~~~;æ§m~~~~~~ª~~I~~§ w ~~~-~~~œöÑÑ~-a--~" ~~~o F *-- ____N___ _ ___ ø - ~ 92~~aaaa~aaaaaa~~aaaaaaaaa ~~-~¡i~~a!~_~~~a~~~~~~a;~ ~ N~NN~ ~o -- ----- ~~m~~~~~~~~~~i2~~~i~8~ iñœ . ~~ ~ ~... ~ .Ñ_ .,.:! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ø . ~ 1! I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~. ~~ tB- I .. J ~ 1 :! ! 8~ ið~ I~~. ~i~1~~ -Qlm i¡~cm~~ au **I!0l!! ~ I- 1m Iii ~~~m o~ !~om ~ *~~~*~m ~IŒ~~~¡~ 1~~~~8c8c~~~~~ cCž ti~t~~ ~~œœi ~~~~i i~lí~;~¡¡IJ8:~8~~88881~ =j 10 ~ !ß !J ~ I I] 1ft Q ~ ~ Q Q ~ ~ ~ 8~! I 8 j; j; I I ~.......6:6:Œ:Œ:8 ~~ N 00 GG...........~~~~ I I p ~ = I Ie TABLE B - AVERAGE BID PRICES RUFE SNOW DRIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS . BA NO. 3899-01 -03 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I . Ie I UNIT PRICES SIG-OP ARJANG DURABLE SHARROCK AVERAGE BID ITEM UNIT SYSTEMS ELECTRIC SPECIALTIES ELECTRIC . .. BID Mobilization LS $4,599.50 $1,600.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 .:.:. $2,549.88 :.:.: Construction Traffic Control MO $600.00 $350.00 $250.00 $800.00 ::::: . $500.00 .:.:. 12- Signal Head - 5 Sec. EA $515.00 $540.00 $500.00 $1 ,000. 00 ~j¡¡¡ $638.75 Traffic Sign R1 0-9 EA $75.00 $100.00 $1 OO~OO $230.00 ¡¡¡i¡ $126.25 Loop Detector Sawcut LF $3.00 $3.90 $4.00 $5.00 ¡¡¡¡¡ $3.98 2-Cond. Shielded Cable LF $0.50 $0.82 $0.50 $1.00 ~I $0.71 Loop Detector Amplifier EA $130.00 $225.00 $100.00 $168.00 ¡¡¡¡¡ $155.75 Controller, Type A EA $2,000.00 $2,900.00 $1,200.00 $2,275.00 j¡j~j $2,093.75 Controller, Type B EA $6,898.00 $6,575.00 $6,000.00 $7,080.00 I¡ $6,638.25 On-Street Muter EA $2,700.00 , $3,750.00 $1 ,800.00 $4,380.00 jjj~¡ $3,157.50 On-Stre. Muter - Spare EA $2,200.00 $2,075.00 $1,600.00 $4,200.00 ¡f $2,518.75 Local Controller - Spare EA $1 ,600.00 $2,075.00 $1,200.00 $2,274.00 ¡¡j~¡ $1,787.25 6-Pair #19 AWG Cable LF $0.70 $1.70 $1.00 $1.50 ¡I $1.23 6-Pair #19 AWG Cable (Fig. 8) LF $2.25 $1.50 $1.00 $1.52 ¡~¡i~ $1.57 1- PVC Conduit LF $4.00 $2.50 $3.00 $1.00 jj~jj $2.63 1 112- PVC Conduit Tr.,ched LF $5.00 $3.40 $3.00 $2.00 j¡iji $3.35 1 1/2- PVC Conduit Bored LF $11.00 $11 .50 $9.00 $~::~ IIIII $12.38 2- PVC Conduit T1'enched LF $4.00 $3.50 $4.00 $3.63 2- PVC Conduit Bored LF $11.00 $12.50 $9.00 $19.00 ;{ $12.88 2- RM Conduit Trenched LF $6.00 $4.50 $5.00 $5. 00 ~¡j¡j $5.13 2- RM Conduit Bored LF $14.00 $15.00 $10.00 $20.00 t¡ $14.75 Conèrete Pull Box EA $100.00 $50.00 $150.00 $65.00 ¡I $91.25 Computer. & Software LS $10 200.00 $10,000.00 $7,000.00 $12 828.00 ~f $10,007.00 FU: BÐ8UM2.WK1 10.10.11 ",' ....It . , -, Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) e Operating Budget Othe ~ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works/utilities Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 2 of $12.348.67 for Crane Road Sewer Improvements Council Meeting Date: 10/28/91 Agenda Number: PAY 91-16 This project was awarded as an assessment project by Council on June 24, 1991 to Wright Construction in the amount of $106,198.50. The total contract amount after change orders was $107,784.45. Final payment to the Contractor will make his total earnings on the project $98,358.63. This is $9,425.82 under the contract amount. The Contractor substantially completed this project on September 13, 1991. The project is now totally complete with all final adjustments having been made. Funding Source: Sufficient construction funds of $107,784.45 were previously appropriated by Council (PW #91-21, 6/24/91 and PW #91-22, 8/12/91). Recommendation: staff recommends Council approve final payment to Wright Construction in the amount of $12,348.67. Finance Review . Finance Director 02-91-02-6000 s Available nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas October 22, 1991 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-429, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, CRANE ROAD SEVER IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2 & FINAL Enclosed is one (1) copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.2 & Final, dated October 22, 1991 made payable to Wright Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $12,348.66, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of October 22, 1991. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Mr. Bill Rutledge, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. This project was designed to provide City sanitary sewer service to those residents along Crane Road south of Amundson Drive who were previously being served by individual septic tanks. The contract amount for this project is $107,784.45, which includes a change order and the Contractor's earnings total to $98,358.63, which is $9,425.82 under the bid amount. Most of the cost savings is the result of not needing the total estimated bid quantity of top soil, solid sodding and culvert drainage pipes. The proposed sanitary sewer line was moved into the existing ditch to avoid relocating telephone poles and removing existing trees and culverts in the R.O.V. as anticipated in the design and therefore did not require the full replacement of these items. The project was completed and a Final Inspection walk thru was performed on September 6, 1991 with only minor discrepancies found. The scheduled completion date of this project is October 27, 1991. The two year maintenance period begins on October 22, 1991 and therefore wi~l terminate on October 22, 1993. The maintenance obligation includes but is not limited to repair and replacement of broken or blocked sanitary sewer mains and services, and cracks in pavement and driveways due to trench settlement or other problems caused by the construction of the sewer project. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I October 22, 1991 PAGE 2 CRANE ROAD SEVER IMPROVEMENTS An affivavit from the contractor is required before final payment is made which states that all his suppliers and subcontractors have been paid and that there are no outstanding claims against the contractor related to this project. We understand that City forces have monitored trench densities, and in the absence of any negative reports we recommend that this final payment in amount of $12,348.66, be made to Vright Construction Co., Inc. at 601 V. Vall Street, Grapevine, Texas 76051. We will be present at the October 28, 1991, Council meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. s~~ ~~W\~~ SUSAN L. SCHWiNGER, P.E. SLS/bvg/f3429119 Enclosures cc: Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manager Greg Dickens, P.E. Director of Public Yorks Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Utilities Bill Rutledge, City Inspector Lee Maness, Director of Finance Vright Construction Co., Inc. I' Ie I I 0) C'\I ~ I M I 1:7 c: W o 1:7 Z..o (1).- .0-'" OeG(1) ~Oa.. I ns c LL cð I C'\I I I o z (1) ns E ~ I o u ns I c: o U I en t- Z W ~ W > o a: · 0.. · ~ U · C I t-a: a:w O~ o..wo wenu a: cc en«o :JO'- t-a:- « u t-W::J enz... «- t-a:ø I ~U~ ~ u .~~ I I I I o 0. ~ -'-3C t-... UU :Jø.. a:Q)'" t-CO en Z-U OUeG Ucþ'" · 0 c · ... 0 · 0.. 0 It 0) 0) 0) 0) I I t-I- UU 00 I I C'\I 0 C'\I ~ l W t-O za: ::)0.. a: t-t- ZZ O:J O~ .« I- o t- t- enw at- 0« C -I «0 1-1- o t- 0000000000000000000 ooooooo~ooooooooooo OOOOO'-C') (000)00 O)NOOOCO O)O)O(")~O N~OCOCC(,,) CO~NCOCOI'- 00000(") oooO)OCO co~oooO) ~COOM~CO N~OCOo)l'_ MNNCOCOI'- oooooao OOOOO'-C') NO)OOOC'\l ~N co 00 ~ MN I I C'\I C'\I 0 0 0 I'- COCOOOOCO ~--OOON '-C')~OOOO ~--~- OOOOO~ 000000) I'_I'_OOOM 00 0 &0 &0 I I 00000&0 000000) -- ~ -- ao 0 C'\I ~~ 1'_0)0) &0 '-C') C'\I 0) ~ M ClQCO--aoOo) ~~ "O)ao o 0 C'\I 0) ~ M OOO&OO~ OOO&OO~ CO~O--CO~ o I'- o C'\I >->-(/)>-z>- ,0 (/) (/)-1 (/)I-(/) -om---- c ~ ~>eð.c.c.c.c OQ) o a. W - - - - c .- - - 0. ø c wo.o.o.o.o-o 0. CQ) ø ~ eG &0 Q) G) Q) CD'- u.c G) C CD a: eG G) - CDM ·0000- CÞ C øa: Q) E U(/) C ~ uc~ CD ECÞCÞc ~C OeG o a: U 1'_" .. .. CÞ C ~ ~ CD U 0. 0 eG - .- - c C 0) -- M COO C ns U ~.- .- « ~ c - ... "'(/)-1 ----cu .cCÞ -ns-a..- 'OCÞftSCD CÞ I I I 0 ~ cE '--0. U --EN> 3= ... 0 ~.. .. .. 0 ~ CD CÞ Q. CD - Q) (/) - CÞ .- 0 CDCD> 1'_0)-- >0 ~> >CDa:...- <co- (/) ~ a. - -- CD ... ~ 0 a: CÞ 0 --- .- 0 CÞ .--- U CD.....o. ~> -0 0.0 "'3!:~« . en '" U . .- en . 0 0 ~ eG - a.. W CD CÞ ns ~ c M)(UUU> -CD <c~~~ t-CDm~ .-:I: ca W )( )( )(... . CÞ ø 2 ~ CD 0 >-w 0 --- CÞ ~ en enca: WWWCD(/)UCÞ.cca :I:CÞ> -...J ~enca : ca C .c en . ~ - - m >.-. CD W t - ... 0 - (/) en U .c .c .c en - 0 Q. 0'- .... U - 0 ~ . en 0 t o cuuu o..c CD CD ...occa -1:JC .- ·en....cccen-ICO--CDO oen2 o~.... Q) -ca(J)t-......... ·:::sc~ ~::IQ. -0 W-(J)(J)Q-a. ca .- . t- t- t- (/) 0 .- ~ ~.- 0 >- - - .c I- .- ~ C ~ >OeG- 1"')( t-CÞca~u-01:J '::JCDI- o .- U - - - . 0. - 0. - CD ~ > .c ~ c ø·- U en E E t 0 C U U U ~ CÞ ø 0 )( - ca t ca 0. > CÞ 0 0.- e t CD t CÞCOt~Ccc-CÞ~""w~enN""ø""""-OO-COON a:·.·::)::)::)(J)coo····~«Ol-mt-(J)~..· ·I-NM~&OCOI'_COo)O-NM.&OCOI'_O)œO_NM~"'CO 01 -----------------NNNNNNN Zl OCOI'-~OOO-I'-~"'COOOOCONCOao &OMONO&O&OCOœNN&O --&0&00) MCO&O.&O&OOMI'_CONM o)NO~ OCOCOON-N.~--~ 1'--- 0000000000000000000 ooooooO&Ooooooooocooo OCOI'-~OOo--~&O&OcoooocoœNao &OMONO&O&OCOœNN&O C'\IMœ~ MO)&O.&O&OOMI'-CONM coœl'-&O OCOaoON--N~~-- a: a: ww >0 oz ::) t- ena: 00 o 0000000000000000000 oooooooooooooooocooo OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOI'-.O o CO co &0 I'_ co N co I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC'\lCOC'\l~ ooooooooooooOOO--aoNM I-W zt- ww 0-1 a: 0.. ~~ ü OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOI'-C'\I~M 000000000000 I'_~--O --------------~------- --M 0000000000000000000 oooooooooooooooocooo a:1 0- a: a: ww >0 oz ::) 0000000000000000).--0 -- -- co &0 -- -- C'\I t->- ...Jt- :Jt- mz 1« en:J «0 0000000000000000000 oooooooooooooooocooo C'\IaoMCOOOO-o)&O--~OOO--COMCO ~N~O&O&O--~ ~&OM. ~~co~- N- &0 t->- Ot- «- a:t- t-z z<c O:J 00 NClQMo)OOO--CO&O--~OOOMN.ao ~N~O"'&O--- &O~œœ &O~CO~-- C'\I~ 0000000000000000000 0000000&0&00000000000 ~~O)M&O~~COCO&O~~&O--~COCO~-- I'_ ----N--COCONœ N NNœN t- Z ::) :t: .:t::t::t::t: o~~~~~~oooo~>-~>-~~~~ « . « « « « ...J W...J...J...J...J...J...Jwwww>(J)...Jen...J-I...J...J z o t- o.. a: o en W o ~ W t- o z o o ~ .0 1:J Q) U Q) « ~ ~ ~ co ~ I'- o M co ao &0 M co 0) N co Ø)Ø) 00 00 &OCÞ NO .eG . C œ·- I ns CÞCÞ -~ nsCÞ 3: en CÞ a: cð &0 N Ø) I'- -- -- CD 0) 1:J ao o CÞ C) c ns .c. U c- .- 0. eGE Eo CÞO a: U C en W o a: a.. Ø)U ~ ... eGCÞ Ca.. t- Z :J o OM Z O)~ « en w l- I- Z e( :J o CÞCD E- .- ca t-o c W l- e( ~ '0 Cl- o Ot- t- wen t-w « oz o o t-C w cncn ~~ CD ~ 4)0 ~ c- o. ....E CÞo 1:JO .... o 1:J ~CD ... .c OU ~cn ZI- a:z «:J w~ a:« o t-t- 00 «« a: a: 1-1- zz 00 00 O)œ œœ I I -It- ~o '0 I I O)~ NN ..J ..J «« 1-1- 00 1-1- I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date: 10/28/91 .epartment: Public Works/utilities Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 2 of $30,428.37 Subject: for Valley Park Estates Sanitary Sewer Improvements I Agenda Number: PAY 91-17 This project was awarded as an assessment project by Council on June 24, 1991 to Hall- Albert Construction Company in the amount of $114,136.38. Final payment to the Contractor will make his total earnings on the project $99,561.60. This is $14,574.78 under contract amount. The Contractor substantially completed this project on September 11, 1991. The project is now totally complete with all final adjustments having been made. Funding Source: Sufficient construction funds of $114,136.38 were previously appropriated by Council (PW #91-19, 6/24/91). Recommendation: Staff recommends Council approve final payment to Hall-Albert Construction Company in the amount of $30,428.37. Finance Review --L- . Finance Director 02-91-01-6000 Avai lable ~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I. I I KNOWl TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas October 18, 1991 Honorable Hayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills P.o. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-428, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, VALLEY PARK ESTATES SANITARY SEVER IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2 & Final Enclosed is one (1) copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.2 and Final, dated October 16, 1991 made payable to Hall-Albert Construction Company in the amount of $30,428.37, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of September 11, 1991. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Hr. Larry Jones, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. This project consists of sanitary sewer improvements within the Valley Park Estates addition and includes sewer main extensions along Valleyview Drive, Parkway Avenue, and the southern portion of Crane Road. The bid amount for this project is $114,136.38 and the Contractor's earnings total to $99,561.60, which is $14,574.78 under the bid amount. The following is a discussion of the primary reasons for the cost savings. 1. Topsoil and solid sodding were not replaced at the vacant lot crossings of the sewer main and services. Host of the cost savings is due to this reduction. 2. The City's street maintenance crew will provide the 2-inch HHAC overlay at the sewer main crossing on Valleyview Drive in lieu of the contractor. 3. Two residents on Parkway Avenue preferred to be served from the sewer main on Valleyview Drive which reduced the length of the sewer main on Parkway Avenue. 4. Only 31.5% of the $2000.00 Miscellaneous Plumbing Allowance was used. This allowance is provided for the replacement of damaged sprinkler systems, etc.. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Itþ I I October 18, 1991 VALLEY PARK ESTS. SAN. SEVER IMPROVEMENTS PAGE 2 The project was completed on September 11, 1991 which is 16 calender days prior to the scheduled completion date of September 27, 1991. The Final Inspection walk thru was performed on October 16, 1991 and only minor discrepancies were found. In addition, the contractor has provided the enclosed affidavit confirming that all bills have been paid. The two year maintenance period begins on October 18, 1991 and therefore will terminate on October 18, 1993. The maintenance obligation includes but is not limited to repair and replacement of broken or blocked sanitary sewer mains and services, and cracks in pavement and driveways due to trench settlement or other problems caused by the construction of the sewer project. We recommend that this payment in amount of $30,428.37, be made to Hall-Albert Construction Co. at 201 N.E. 29th Street, Fort Worth, Texas 76106. Ve will be present at the October 28, 1991, Council meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. ~~~ ~. ....s:-~ SUSAN L. SCHVINGER, P.E. SLS/bvg/f3428119 Enclosures cc: Hr. Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manager ./Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Vorks Kevin Hiller, P.E., Assistant Director of Utilities Larry Jones, City Inspector Hall-Albert Construction Co. I I.~ g~ I ~ ~~ . , 'C I'" ~ I ew I~ .ø IN I o I~ .. e f!Þ I I I z>- I ~c en. -( )~ -wo ....0 ....: Ia:...c oeno a.. w .- w ~ o:~u o:=- enc", I ::) Q. ..- .... ø ~>c t-wo en..Jo ..I t-4(- I~>~ I~ I ;: .: :J: ou :;) . .. 0:.... ....00 I~-¿;~ 0.... .-- . 0 c n o 'C z..o ..- .c-'" 0"· ~co.. o u( ) .... ...z ~~ OW 0> o a: a.. 2 a: ~ W en a: t-.... zz 0:3 u~ .<111( ... o .... .... enw Ot- U~ c ..J <111(0 ....... o t- 00000000000.000000000.000 o~oooooooo~~ooo~o~oo.o.o. ~NON~O~OO~~~O~O~O~MO~O~OM .~ONo~œ~.~NN ~O~ O~~OO~O~ ~~No..œo~~~œ ~MM MN~~~.O~ .~ ~MCN N NC~ --M.~NN M- OOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOONOOO o~oooooOOOCOOOO-ON.OO-NO. O~NN~O~OO~~~O.MNON~OOO~OM N~ONOM.o.œN~ ~N. ~~ O~OM- MNNO.MœNC.~~ ~~~ M. ~œ-~- Mœ .~N N -~ M N M- a: a: ww >0 Oz ~ .... ena: 00 u OOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOONOOO ooooooooooo~ooo.o~~o.œNOO ~~NOOOOOOoo.O.~~OM~o~œMOO NN ~~N œ ~ œ~- ~~~IN~~ M~ 10- M ~~C ~- ~MM I I I I I M.- I I , ....w Zt- WW (J..J a: 0. ~~ U ~_oooœ~~oœO-OM~~O-.O~--OO _œOOO.MMO.O~O~øØO~-O~NNOO . U') ~M_OOO~cøO~O"ON~.OfW)~Oœoo ,0 œooOO~.Mo~oœ ~~~ NM œNN-O ___~ M- a:' 0- a: a: ww >0 Oz :;) OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~O . ~ ~"NOOOO~O~OMO"~"OU')"M~NN '0 ~. ~_ ,~~.M -.NI--O I , I I I I I I NN I I I ....> ..J'" :;:)t- mz Ie ~ð OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~o 00000000000000000000000-0 ·M oœNN~oœO~N~œO.N-O~~OO~~ ~~ONOM M M~. .~. ~N 0000 œ-NO.M ~œ -0 OMM M t-> 0.... e- a:.... ....z ze 0:;:) 00 ~~ONøoœN~~~NO~O~OMOM~œœ-- MNONO--N M~O œo~ ~~NO-- O-NO.. cøo -N O~~ N- M-- OOOOOOOOOOONOO~OOOOOO~OCC O~OOOOOOOON~OON-oœœON-cøo. W 1-0 za:: :;)0. ~~____~OO~-N--U')~~.~O-MMOM O.M~ M- -~ -~ 0- __~ 0- NN .... . J: ::I: ::I: . J: ~~~~~~ooo~~~»>~~~~o~»encn ·~~C..J .~ ..J..J..J..J..J..Jwww>..Iencnenen..J..I..J..Jw..Jencn..J..J m---- c > o~~~~~ o. »->- > ... >w~~..-..-c-- 0 »~. ... .. a..w~~~~O"-O .0"-.. ( ) ....·-u~ > .~a: . c·-en .. ~ 'OOCO"-.c U.. "'u- M- UC.. > ~a:-cE~"'c ~CU u........ .c2. ... ·~o-..o .c a:c~œ-McO ~ .0uOuo:-- e.- 0- --cO'O 0. ftI ftI- '0 ( ) "I I 0 ftI~ 'C ~c-"'~u --'C 0" .. .. .. 0 ..- c a: - . >-.... 2 ~ - . ( ) - a: ...>~~œ- >0. ~ > ftll ..~.~ 4( .0.. -.... 2 c "'-U')ena:~uo-'" . . _ _ _ _ U ... .-. . ... - ::I ftI ... Q. 0 ... C . ~ . .- en..... - 0 en. - >- CJ - a... e ftI enMUUUU> 0...· >>-.... ~ .m.... )C )C )C )C... . e ~ ftI 0 0 0 . e" . 1 e >-0""-' . 0 .a:wwww.en U 2 4( . e.a:.. ~cn . c Q ( ) ... z:. . >-2 O. . > N e 1 ftI en ~ ~ ~ ~ en - ~ - .0 % I > ..- ... ~ · . Q. (/) U U U U· Q. ~ Q. .- ... ....., 0 . - 'C C e (/)CCCC(/)..,....'CO "'0..0 (/) Oftla: . (/) ... ... ...... .::1 C 0 ::I a: . C .a. - (/) (/) ftI . t- t- .... t- (/) 0 .- 0 -. c .ø - ... >.c .- _. I" ~.>- .::I"'UO'C ·c o .- - - - - . Q.~ ... . C -... >- U . > 0 e c ..- U e cuuuu'CeG~.E. t-c...ftI e.Q.-G> II CCCC....)C(/»CI 1 00"'1 ......oo-a.. cø.~:;)~~enoow·Q.-"NomCJcøQ.........en2· z ~ z o .... Q. a: o en w o 2 w .... "'" _NM.U')ø~~œO-NM..U')cø<lll(~~œO-NM" _______Ø___NNNNN ø ... · 'C ... o · OJ C ftI .c o >- .0 'C CD U · c - ~ M ~ (If) .. o ~ ~ '" œ eft ~ ~ .. 00 00 .. ~ at ~ew . c . .- - ftI I .. -. ew. ~en e a: .ø M NØ ø (If) -M ~e ~ 'C M ~ o CD at C ew ~ o c- .- ~ ·e EO -0 a: U C en w o a: Q. IOU >-... .. OQ. I- Z ::::) o z c en w t- t- Z c ð O. ~. .. e- .- .. t-O '0 c.... o 0.... o w ... i .... wen ....w c O~ o ""0 w en en i~ . .. .0 .. 0- ~ ...e .0 'Co ... o 'C ~. ...~ au it en z.... a:z C~ ~~ o ........ 00 C~ a: a: .... t- 88 œœ œœ , I ..J Q. ::)w ..,en I , œ~ NN ..J ..J 4(4( t-t- 00 t-t-