The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1990-02-12 Agendas I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 12, 1990 - 6:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. GN 90-23 AEGON - Request for Variance to Allow the Grazing of Horses and Cattled on C-2 Zoned Property (Agenda Item No. 11) (10 Minutes) 2. GN 90-24 TU Electric Rate Case - Resolution No. 90-09 (Agenda Item No. 12) (10 Minutes) 3. PS 89-23 Request of Centex Real Estate Corp. for Replat of Lots lR, 6R thru 9R, Block 11, and Lots 1 thru 4, Block 12R, Fair Oaks Estates, 2nd Filing (Located North of Old Bursey Road and West of Keller Smithfield Road) (Agenda Item No.8) (10 Minutes) 4. GN 90-29 Park and Recreation Open Space Master Plan (Agenda Item No. 17) (10 Minutes) 5. GN 90-28 Updating User Fees - Ordinance No. 1658 (Agenda Item No. 16) (10 Minutes) I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 6. PW 90-09 Approve Budget for 1990 Aerial Photography for City (Agenda Item No. 21) (5 Minutes) 7. IR 90-22 Forklift for Use at the Service Center (5 Minutes) 8. IR 90-18 Joint City Council/Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting (5 Minutes) 9. Items on Consent Agenda not on Pre-Council - (9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23 & 24) (5 Minutes) 10. Possible Work Session 11. Other Items (5 Minutes) 12. *Executive Session (5 Minutes) a. Personnel b. Briefing on Pending Litigation c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition 13. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 12, 1990 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1 . Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting January 22, 1990 5. Presentations by Boards & Commissions a) Jan Daniels, Chairman of the Library Board b) Library Board Minutes 6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 7. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 & 24) I· Page 2 I I NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN I * 8. PS 89-23 Request of Centex Real Estate Corp. for Replat of Lots 1R, 6R I thru 9R, Block 11, and Lots 1 thru 4, Block 12R, Fair Oaks I Estates, 2nd Filing (Located North of Old Bursey Road and West I of Keller Smithfield Road) (Postponed at the January 22nd City Council Meeting) I * 9. GN 90-21 Calling City Council Election, I Resolution No. 90-06 I *10. GN 90-22 Transfer of Funds I 11. GN 90-23 AEGON - Request for Variance to Allow the Grazing of Horses and Cattle on C-2 Zoned Property; I I 12. GN 90-24 TU Electric Rate Case - Resolution No. 90-09 I *13. GN 90-25 Approve Speed Limit on Shady I Grove Road 40 MPH - Ordinance No. 1659 I *14. GN 90-26 Property Tax Refund I *15. GN 90-27 Approve Amendment to Ordinance No. 722, Regulating IINo Parkingll I Zone on Marilyn Lane - Ordinance No. 1660 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Paqe 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *16. GN 90-28 Updating User Fees - Ordinance No. 1658 *17. GN 90-29 Park and Recreation Open Space Master Plan *18. PU 90-04 Purchase of Two Utility Vehicles - Iron Horse Golf Course - Resolution No. 90-07 *19. PU 90-05 Award of Bid for Dump Trucks to Graff Chevrolet *20. PU 90-07 Award of Bid for Camera Systems to Ikegami Electronics *21. PW 90-09 Approve Budget for 1990 Aerial Photography for City (Postponed at the January 22, 1990 Meeting) *22. PW 90-12 Award of Bid for Davis Boulevard Utility Adjustments *23. PAY 90-03 Approve Final Pay Estimate #2 in the Amount of $26,260.10 to Tri-Tech Construction, Inc. - Wilman Avenue Drainage Improvements *24. PAY 90-04 Approve Final Pay Estimate #7 in the Amount of $37,909.84 to Bil-Mik, Inc. - Miscellaneous Water & Sewer Improvements 1988 I- . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 25. Citizens Presentation 26. Recess to Executive Session 27. Reconvene 28. Adjournment PúSTE.D c:2Jc:?J2-J2- D'ète q;2g_d.:Æ·-- -...-.- .----- 'i ·~l·-~'._ c: ~':.') S.~: ~:·tC: :;.;ij ~- ~ --.- . \. I - _ --'..--.--..-.-.----- '.? --'- I I Ie I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I 1- I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 90-16 ~ ~ V Subject: Date: January 26, 1990 Door to Door distribution of material On Monday, December 11, 1989 Mr. Charles Cole appeared, for the second time, before the City Council to protest leaflets and handbills being left on his door. Mr. Cole appeared to be under the impression that the Village of Lakeway, Texas (where he formerly resided) had an ordinance making it illegal to place leaflets, handbills or flyers on the door of private residences. We requested copies of these ordinances from the Lakeway Police Department The Police Department of Lakeway Village forwarded to us copies of their Ordinance #89-06-13-3 which governs solicitors and vendors and Ordinance #88-04-12-3 which covers the control of litter. We find in neither ordinance, a provision to forbid the distribution door-to-door of material. Ordinance #88-04-12-13 in Article 2 Section 1 (c) does state "It shall be the duty of every person distributing handbills, leaflets, flyers or other advertising and informational material to take whatever measures may be necessary to keep such materials from littering public or private property". It is possible that this provision caused Mr. Cole to believe that no materials could be left at the door of his home. Ordinance #89-06-13-3 governs solicitors canvassers or vendors going door-to-door and not only requires that these persons register with the city, as does our ordinance, but also permits the home owner to post at the front door a weather-proof 3" X 5" card stating "No Solicitors Invited". If such a card is present, it is forbidden for a solicitor to ring the door bell or "create any sound...calculated to attract the attention of the occupant..." This ordinance, however, does not forbid the solicitor from attaching an object to the front door of the residence. We found, therefore, no evidence that an ordinance, such as Mr. Cole proposes, exists in the Village of Lakeway. In September, following Cole's initial appearance before Council, he was contacted by Crime Prevention Officer Jim Wilkins who offered to assist Mr. Cole in forming a crime watch in his neighborhood. Jim's efforts were unsuccessful. Following Mr. Cole's 2nd appearance before Council we forwarded a copy of the Lakeway Ordinance to Mr. Cole's residence together with a follow-up offer to assist him in crime watch activities but advising that we would not recommend the ordinance requested by Mr. Cole. We have no indication from Mr. Cole that he wishes to participate in the activity we have suggested to him. Our itinerant vendor's ordinance seems to be functioning in an acceptable fashion without this added provision, and we know of no City having such an ordinance. The city attorney advises that such an ordinance would probably violate the 1st amendment right to free speech. The Police Department, therefore does not recommend we pursue an ordinance that would forbid the placing of handbills, leaflets or pamphlets on the front door of homes. J9';J~ <1hi~f of Police f' / _ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I No. IR 90-19 INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ^ ~l1 x 1'1r:;: V Date: February 8, 1990 Subject: Water and Wastewater Master Pl an At the January 23, 1990 Goals and Objectives Workshop the City Council asked about the procedures followed to update the Water and Wastewater Master Plan. The attached memo from Greg Dickens, explaining this procedure, is forwarded to you for your information. Respectfully submitted, 9.~/~ Deputy City Manager DH/gp _ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of J:{òrth Richland Hills February 5, 1990 REF: PWM 90-018 MEMO TO: Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manger FROM: Gregory W. Dickens, Director of Public Works/Utilities RE: WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM; Grid Maps & System Master Plan As you know, we currently have a set of grid maps at a scale of 1" equals 100 feet which shows all the locations of water and sewer lines and services. Also noted are the size of lines, location of fire hydrants, valves, and manholes. These maps are updated at least once a year by Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. (K-E-F) based on "as-built" development plans we send K-E-F or corrections and additions our Inspectors note on a blueline set which is provided to K-E-F. The Master Plans for our water and sewer system reflect the existing and proposed lines throughout our service area. The proposed lines are sized and located based on computerized hydraulic analysis on the system of pipes. The analysis determines future needs in the pipe systems to provide adequate capacity for the projected population. The Master Plans for the Water and Sewer Systems are revised and updated when requested or when necessary as part of another project. The Water and Sewer Master Plans are currently being reanalyzed as part of the Water and Sewer Impact Fee Study. (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 820609 . NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76182-0609 I Ie I :1 I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 90-20 ~ ~ Date: February 8, 1990 x ~ ~ Subject: Beach Street Water Line Easements At the January 8, 1990 City Council Meeting, a change order to the Beach Street water line was discussed and approved (see attached IR 90-05). At the City Council 's request, residents along Denton Highway who had previously refused to sign easements were contacted again on January 17, 1990 and given an opportunity to sell an easement to the City (see attached letters). Once again we w~re not able to obtain any additional easements. The project is currently proceeding and the two inch line along Denton Highway will not be replaced. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Deputy City Manager DH/gp _ ISSUED BYTHECITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I No. I R 90-05 INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ~ M ~~ V Date: January 10, 1990 Subject: Beach Street Water L; ne Easements This Informal Report is written to clarify to the City Council what actions were taken by the staff relating to the attempts to obtain easements from the 16 property owners fronting Denton Highway. It was stated at the Council Meeting on January 8, 1990 that we were attempting to obtain a 25' easement in people's front yards and it was also implied that we were not sensitive to the needs of these citizens nor did we notify them of a final opportunity to give an easement prior to the City scrubbing the project. The facts are: 1) No one was ever askpd for a 25' easement. The legal easement documents, available in my office, clearly shows that the most anyone would have to give is 15'. In one case we would be able to get by with as little as 5'. Every possible attempt was made to keep this easement as narrow as possible, not only to accommodate the residents by minimizing front yard disruption but also to avoid the possibility of damaging or killing their trees. . 2) It has been the policy of this City, for several years, not to pay for easements that were obtained for the primary benefit of a particular property owner. However, on the Denton Highway situation a decision was made to try our very best to accommodate the residents and we did in fact pay from $200-$400 to each person for an easement. I would think this shows our willingness to accommodate those citizens. 3) It was also implied that such property owners were not notified that the project was about to be scrubbed. Our Right-af-way Agent has met, personally at least three times, with each property owner. He is well aware of their addresses (as none of the letters were returned) and who he is dealing with. Please see the attached letter that was mailed on October 11, 1989 advising them liThe City of North Richland Hills has therefore decided not to build the water line as originally planned. Although we have the authority to condemn the remaining property owners for an easement under the power of eminent domain, we choose not to do so. We will retain the easements we have acquired for possible future building of the water main. II It is hard for me to understand how any of these citizens would not know that the project was about to be dropped. _ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH AICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 At the request of the City Council, we will notify each of these property owners again (by certified mail) and offer them the opportunity to participate in this project. I will advise the Council of their decision. Respectfully submitted, Ç)~~ Dennis Horvath Deputy City Manager DH/gp CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Ie il I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of JXòrth Richland Hills October 11, 1989 REF: PWL-194-89 Ms. Jimy Ruth Elliott 5600 Dent Road North.Ri~and Hills, TX 76117 RE: . BEACH STRŒI' WATER MAIN Segment C - Highway 377 Dear Ms. Elliott, Since'approximately June 1, 1989, I have been discussing and negotiating, on behalf of the City of North Richland Hills, with you and other property owners on the east side of Highway 377 to' acquire water line easements for the project referenced above. Although we have acquired approximately one-half of the necessary easements, there are sane property owners who ei ther will not vol\D1tarily grant us an easerrent under any condition, or at least under terms agreeable to the Ci ty . I (The City of North Richland 1Íills has therefore decided not to build the water line as originally planned. Although we have the authority to condBt1l1 the remaining property owners for an easement under the power of oonent darain, we ch<X)se not to do so. We will retain the easements \tJe have acquired for possible future building of t1}e water main. I) '!bank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please call me at 281-0041. Sincerely, ~ Mark D. Bradley Right-of-Way Agent MDB/ds (817) 281-0041 . 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of J(òrth Richland Hills I February 6, 1990 REF: PWM 90-021 MEMO TO: Gregory W. Dickens Director of Public Works/Utilities FROM: Mark D. Bradley Right-Of-Way Agent SUBJECT: BEACH STREET WATER MAIN; Segment C - Highway 377 Dent Drive to Tourist Drive On January 17, 1990 certified letters were mailed to six property owners, out of 16 total owners who had not granted water line easements as of that date, to the City for the above referenced project. Four of the six owners have returned the letters indicating they do not wish to grant the easement for our offered amounts. I have telephoned the two owners who did not mail their letters back to me, and they too do not wish to grant the easement based on our offer. The letters are attached for your review. 7/v1. Cv~ L y. ;It\. ~ c~ MB/gj (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 820609 · NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76182-0609 I ,Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of J:{òrth Richland Hills January 17, 1990 REF: PWL-288 John and Mary Gambill 3764 Denton Hwy. North Richland Hills, Tx 76117 RE: BEAm STREET WATER MAIN; Segment C - Highway 377 Dent Road to Tourist Drive Dear Mr. or Mrs. Gambill, On October 11, 1989 I sent a letter to you and the other haœowners on the east side of Highway 377. Basically I indicated that although we had acquired just over half of the easeœnts fran haneowners necessary to build the water nain, we decided not to proceed with the project at this tine because of optx'si tion from the remaining haœowners. During a discussion at the City Council Meeting on 1/8/90, it was rœntioned that sate of these haneowners had previously indicated they had never received my above referenced letter and Sate stated, erroneously, that I was asking for a 25' easenent for the water line. No easenent of roore than 15' was ever requested. In order to clear up any confusion and also to clarify your choice in this matter for the City Council's benefit, please initial one of the following: I would be in favor of granting the attached water line easeœnt for the above referenced project in return for cat1pensation of $200.00. \VOuld not be in favor of granting the attached water line as for the above referenced project in retUD'l for canpensation of $200.00. (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 820609 . NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76182-0609 I ~Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~~ ~~4{h?_LuJ After you have initialed and signed the letter, please ma.il back to me in the enclosed addressed and stamped envelope. Sincerely, "lv-n,J ) ttl¡ {,--d¿~"'ì Mark D. Bradley Right-Of-Way Agent MDB/gkj attachIœnt I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I City of X>rth Richland Hills January 17, 1990 REF: PWL-288 Ms. June E. Nix 3720 Denton Hwy North Richland Hills, Tx 76117 RE: BEACH STREEr WATER MAIN; Segrænt C - Highway 377 Dent Road to Tourist Drive Dear Ms. Nix, On October 11, 1989 I sent a letter to you and the other haneowners on the east side of Highway 377. Basically I indicated that although we had acquired just over half of the easements fran haœowners necessary to build the water main, we decided not to proceed with the project at this ti1œ because of opposition fran the remaining haœowners. During a discussion at the City Council Meeting on 1/8/90, it was rœntioned that sare of these haneowners had previously indicated they had never received my above referenced letter and sare stated, erroneously, that I was asking for a 25' easement for the water line. ~ easement of more than 15' was ever requested. In order to clear up any confusion and also to clarify your choice in this ma.tter for the City Cotmcil' s benefit, please initial one of the following: I would be in favor of granting the attached water line easaœnt for the above referenced project in retunl for canpensation of $200.00. ~ I would not be in favor of granting the attached wa~r line easement for the above referenced project in retunl for canpensation of $200.00. (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 820609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76182-0609 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Please also sign your name below. ~MA/LL 71J~ Ms. J e E. Nix [ After you have initialed and signed the letter, please mai~_ back to Iœ in the enclosed addressed and staJr1!:ed envelope. Sincerely, l'V-- ç'~~/c j) ~1... (, rti'ì Mark D. Bradley Right-Of-Way Agent MDB/gkj attachtœnt I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of JXòrth Richland Hills January 17, 1990 REF: PWL-288 Raymond and Cynthia williams 3714 Denton Hwy North Richland Hills, Tx 76117 RE: BEAaI STREETI' WATER MAIN; Segrœnt C - Highway 377 Dent Road to Tourist Drive Dear Mr. or Mrs. Williams, On October 11, 1989 I sent a letter to you and the other haneowners on the east side of Highway 377. Basically I indicated that although we had acquired just over half of the easements fran haneowners necessary to build the water main, we decided not to proceed with the project at this time because of op¡;x:>si tion fran the remaining haneowners. During a discussion at the City Council Meeting on 1/8/90, it was IœI1tioned that sane of these haneowners had previously indicated they had never received my above referenced letter and sane stated, erroneously, that I was asking for a 25' easeœnt for the water line. No easement of more than 15' was ever requested. In order to clear up any confusion and also to clarify your choice in this ma.tter for the City Council's benefit, please initial one of the following: I would be in favor of granting the attached water line easement for the above referenced project in return for canpensation of Joo.oo. A J ' " :./ J C Si)J I would not be in favor of granting the attached water line easement for the above referenced project in return for canpensation of $300.00. .----- ~~~ v (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 820609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76182-0609 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Please/illso sign your nane/ ~+qw-- '. ~ / f' / !/ / /Þ r¡ I / / / -. Cl~!r7~~ t:<-C f./ L "é C L ¿ £.~ ~i Raynond ~illiams ~tkv Wd¿~~ r Cynth · Williams After you have initialed and signed the letter, please nail back to Ire in the enclosed addressed and stamped envelo~. Sincerely, lvcvJ<- ~ ~c'-~ Mark D. Bradley Right-Of-Way Agent MDB/gkj attactment I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of J(òrth Richland Hills January 17, 1990 REF: PWI.,-288 Velma Estes 5601 Tourist North Richland Hills, Tx 76117 RE: BEACH SrrREm' WATER MAIN; Segment C - Highway 377 Dent Road to Tourist Drive Dear Ms. Estes, On October 11, 1989 I sent a letter to you and the other haœowners on the east side of Highway 377. Basically I indicated that although we had acquired just over half of the easerents fran haneowners necessazy to build the water main, we decided not to proceed with the project at this tiIœ because of opposition from the rercaining haœowners. During a discussion at the City Council Meeting on 1/8/90, it was mentioned that sate of these haneowners had previously indicated they had never received my above referenced letter and sate stated, erroneously, that I was asking for a 25' easerent for the water line. No easement of IOOre than 15' was ever requested. In order to clear up any confusion and also to clarify your choice in this matter for the City Council's benefit, please initial one of the following: I would be in favor of granting the attached water line easement for the above referenced project in return for canpensation of $300.00. I would not be in favor of granting the attached water line easement for the above referenced project in return for compensation of $300.00. (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180 'I Ie I I I I I I I 1\. I I I I I I I Ie I Please also sign your name below. Velma Estes After you have initialed and signed the letter, please mail back to rre in the enclosed addressed and stamped envelope. Sincerely, Mark D. Bradley Right-Of-Way Agent MDB/gkj attachment I Ie I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I Ie I City of JXòrth Richland Hills January 17, 1990 REF: PWL-288 Ms. Jimy Ruth Elliott 5600 Dent Road North Richlarid Hills, Tx 76117 RE: BFACH STREET WATER MAIN; Segnent C - Highway 377 Dent Road to Tourist Drive Dear Ms. Elliott, On October 11, 1989 I sent a letter to you and the other haœowners on the east side of Highway 377. Basically!' indicated that although we had acquired just over half of the easements fran haneowners necessary to build the water main, we decided not tó proceed with the project at this tiIœ because of opposi tion fran the remaining haneowners. During a discussion at the City Council Meeting on 1/8/90, it was mentioned that sane of these haneowners had previously indicated they had never received my above referenced letter and sane stated, erroneously, that I was asking for a 25' easement for the water line. No easement of rrore than 15' was ever requested. In order to clear up any confusion and also to clarify your choice in this matter for the City Council's benefit, please initial one of the following: I would be in favor of granting the attached water line easement for the above referenced project in return for ccrcp!nsation of $200.00. I would not be in favor of granting the attached water line easement for the above referenced project in return for canpensation of $200.00. (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 820609 . NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TeXAS 76182-0609 ,I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Please also sign your name œlow. Jimy Ruth Elliott After you have ini tialed and signed the letter, please trail back to rœ in the enclosed addressed and stamped envelope. Sincerely, MW O· ~~.~ Mark D. Bradley Right-Of-Way Agent MDB/gkj attachIrent I I- I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I Ie I City of J:{òrth Richland Hills /') v-fi- January 17, 1990 ~,Y Ed/! ~ ~~ Falls 3708 Denton Hwy North Richland Hills, Tx 76117 REF: PWL-288 RE: BEACH STREFI' WATER MAIN; Segnent C - Highway 377 Dent Road to Tourist Drive ~ar Mr. or Mrs. Falls, On October 11, 1989 I sent a letter to you and the other haneowners on the east side of Highway 377. Basically I indicated that although we had acquired just over half of the easerrents from haneowners necessary to build the water main, we decided not to proceed with the project at this tine because of opposition fran the remaining haneowners. During a discussion at the City Council Meeting on 1/8/90, it was rœntioned that sœe of these hœeowners had previously indicated they had never received my a}:x)ve referenced letter and sare stated, erroneously, that I was asking for a 25' easerœnt for the water line. No easanent of more than 15' was ever requested. In order to clear up any confusion and also to clarify your choice in this matter for the City. Council's benefit, please initial one of the following: I would be in favor of granting the attached water line ease.ment for the a}:x)ve referenced project in return for canpensation of $200.00. t: ¡J. cif I would not be in favor of granting the attached water line easanent for the a}:x)ve referenced project in return for canpensation of $200.00. (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 820609 . NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76182-0609 :1 Ie I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I- I Please,a;iso sign your name below. ../ ¿ ,/1. //:¿;;; ? //¿/~~ c ..~~ I((}Y ~F~s , ___;; LJ~ J ftJlJ í:" l¿ A ~ Fal¡s . After you have ini tialed and signed the letter, please ma.il back to rre in the enclosed addressed and stamped envelope. Sincerely, J JJ 7 ~ ," -1'\A-c\" L (J. f'^.. ('- {Jl~ Mark D. Bradley Right-Of-Way Agent MDB/gkj attachrœnt I I lie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 90-21 Date: February 12, 1990 Subject: VANCE ROAD; Loop 820 South Access Road south 250 feet to Existing Roadway Attached is copies of letters which provide explanation as to where the developer, Richland Hills Church of Christ, is with respect to the subject road construction. The ARCO pipeline "Encroachment Agreement" that must be signed by the City prior to beginning the subject road construction is being prepared by ARca right now. ARCO has advised that for the agreement to be drafted for this particular situation and be reviewed by their legal department may take 90 days. We will continue to coordinate with the developer's engineer and ARca personnel to try and expedite this project whenever possible. Works/Utilities GWD/gkj ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS I· J I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Land Development Consultant Civil Engineering 4200 West Vickery. Suite 11 0 P.O. Box 1 00247 Fort Worth. Texas 761 85 817/763-0127 Wm. L. Boomer, P.E. President LandC~n '~~,;-' ",.) ,¿r ,'. ~~:J d -.:t Till a. It Y" ...}.;.,. ~ ~J ~1 U ~J () hI1 ~] () 1111 S t,c; rL, ':.:. L . City of North Bicnlana Hills .t'. (). Box 166U8 Nor~h Richland tillIS, 1 ex as '7 6 1 ö U he: Varlce h{)r:ict L)ear i"lr. ~]() hIlS t.Ol1 : ~£llC i. () s eo. .i....:;¡ .3 i.~oP-:l :~, t '7-; ~-le :, ~~t¡ te r ::: r()ffit4. rc C', =- -:L pe :_.: l n.e \.ji.)mpany ~ ""Iance h03a <')ver "their .Llneln The 0nt.:)W regarding constructlon Heìgh~s Addition. I propose ~hat the s~ree~ Wl~nln tneir easemen~ oe ~:ons~ruc~ea wl'th 8; Cl'"us11ed ;3tJ\)t1e Q;'=ise, b rein:1:c)rcea "~Cinc~re"te 311ograde, .3na ~) I! H. 1:1 . A . C. sur f ace I.: () u r 3' e . Your a~~en~ion is direct~Q ~o ~he last senten~e regaraing ~heir requ.iremen "t.;3 !iJr ,:1.11 £!1C rc<3.C flrnell"t Ag'l·eemen."t.. 1. ha. ve De ell S.Cl v i sea tha~ this will no~ De subml~~eQ ior some SlX~Y ~o nlne~y days. Area has been lns~ructed to prepare ~he agreemen~ ior Ci~y approval. (~!1a sìg!1a"tLl.re. 1 wl_ll ICJl"war(j 1 T-, t.() ~{(.)U ì...ìfle!1 l. 't is ,:ìVai.laDle. .t' 1.. e 8. 5 e 2 a v J_ S e 2-! J' t) U i1 a ve ::± n ~ý ;~ :~ e s "t 1 0 Ii S . ~:¡ .111 (:; A r ~ 1.:l , ~,J a !1 d C; t) fl ~ V~ 1. -'- .L l a ill .--'. t! ',) (! mer, c.~.I. C: t:; L a r r ~'l w t t:~ 1 a c l~ m () 11 1--: ,¡ I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ARCO Pipe Line Company P. O. Box 639 Arlington, Texas 76004 Telephone 817 2673242 Arlington District January 24, 1990 William L. Boaœr, P. E. LandCon, Ine. P. O. Box 100247 Ft. WOrth, Texas 76185 RE: Encroaclnœnt on ARCO' s 3" & 6 I' Lines to Accx:m:rlate the Extension of Vance Road in the Ci ty of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas. Our File: LL 956 - 58. Dear Bill: ~~ ~, Our managenent has agreed to the propJsal of placing 6 ". thick. x 10 I wide x 20' long concrete slabs over our existing 3" & 6" pipelines, essentially as shown on the attached drawing. 'lhis agreaœnt is cx:>ntingent up:m the City of North Rich1and Hills entering into an Encroach1œnt Agreaœnt with ARCO Pipe Line Canpany . Said Encroach1œnt Agreaœmt will state, in part, that if we ever have to gain access to our pipelines under Vance Road, then we will not be respJnsible for damage to nor the restoration of the street. WOrk on the street over our lines is not approved lIDtil after the Encroach1œnt Agreaœmt is signed. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely yours, fi~~ne~ Land & R/W Agent Œ1S:cs Attach. ec: O. D. Harris 1-1. L. Russell ~~[?nf\rr:J9 i1 \ J /\i ~ 2 9. ; S JQ ¡ 1V! , ~ ; ~ H ~.~_., . .~~~ ,,-t.J t..) Ll ~....:~ ~.' .. -- ~ '-' ~ '- _..-.~_._-~~---------~~~-~-~-~ N 10' 30' It) , ~~\: a ~ 'U \J \.. > Q q: , ~ '1 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ,\J t .a. V) ~ .") t' <::) Q.. ~ ~~~ <:) ~ ......'^ ~ ~I ~ ~íl~0 I l 'f; iAJo e ¡- J.I ___ '", ¡ I I t 'tn ¡ I I "I --.J -L .LL I ~ ~I ~ , "'" ~ ~ ':f 0... \J ~ \,¿,. 01 ~ () ~ ~I ~ ~ i vI '" ~ ~ ~ t( ~¡ ~ C() ARea PIPE LINE COMPANY I ~/7 ^ ~ \ Lt \.... ~ If. €>/5 "4- ~/3 Vi W. W fJLLRC E TARRANT SURVEY) R -I bOb CDUNTV J TEXR5 IN l' ~ t\I Lbc.a"'''ot') Mðp (No Sc,Qje) fD" 3" ~ ¡:¡el.INGTO'" I i I r : t ; I I ¡ : , i ! ¡¡I , · t ! I I ¡ . I I r I , : 1 I J I , ¡ I'! ¡ r I I I . . t I 1 : I I f ~ , . I ! : j i' i:' : I ! d I I i I I ! I ¡Ii I I I " ~ , ¡ ¡ I I I II ~ T I. I - r-- ~,~ 114 .!..,p .. :a -.. ~ I i ; I !.. 7T ð I , I 0 0 Q Q to I. t 0 a,. t v 0 T , "- ~ I, 1 I I , ¡ I : j. f1' . ~ rll ...! · .: C)t ~ 01 ~t .-. It: D t'-....., G1 '-I~AI ~ . ~ rre ! I;. i~II""'"'; I ,íl,j. í III t Ii I : i' ,!, IG;UIA ~QiC'':¡ I: ;...I-,,\,...L ,QI' t". ~ :J 1ð~ ..I I I II~' I : !j!'il lr 1;I!j: ,,:: iI, ¡I,!; r: ." I I! I" i !. F Li t.. , H ~' ~ ¡ i i! : i ~ .; ~ I I ! " ; ¡liT : i ¡:; I ,: ! ~ ,. I I T I I : I I I I It: t' ^:~ i t 1\.1 I . I r I" I 'J i I I i ~ ~I' I I I t I ¡ I: ( !r41 L I a-., I I ,; I, 'f; ~ i,.......~....:.J I t I t tJ..-~" - II I ! I I ~ ~ ~--¡;- ~ i ~'"--L. . . ._"" I · ¡ t I i ; I I " : i I I I fiT I ~ I ¿ " 1-'-' ~ t I""-F- -1 J I I I i I " ï ii' i I t ¡Ii f t ,&-t- -L...l ~p.-. _ I , J I ! I I t I , , I I í I : I I I ! ¡ I t t.,.....,......--...... - r;¡ ; I I I t ; I ! I I , I I t I I / ".;Ii I:S' ¡It ! I I I I ~ , . i I ; ! ~ I, , ! ~ : ¡ f I f : , I . I; ! I : i J I I . I I i tiT I' I I I ! I I I : I I f t I ; I I, ~ , INDEPENDENCE. KANSAS AKLINCrTðN- Fr:WðRrH 3t1~, II RT VRNCE. RDAD, SNOW HEIGHTS flDDI;;ÞN, NDRTH R,CHLAND HILLS, 7Ë.~AS. LL 15'-58 HAP 5 LDc ~O-~O!Z. DATE I DRAWN 1-/8-&¡(J SCL SCALE I CH'CK'O I : z: ~ ß)/)1 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 90-22 ^ \)~ ~~ Date: February 12, 1990 Subject: Forklift for use at the Service Center The Service Center which is occupied by Public Works and Vehicle Maintenance is equipped with a loading dock for ease in delivery of inventory items by freight trucks. Deliveries of large and heavy items such as water meters, pipes, fire hydrants, clamps, etc. has created the need for a forklift. Management Policy CMA-0021 addresses the subject of unloading delivery trucks; however, a problem exists when moving the equipment from the loading dock to its ultimate destination. Currently, the movement of these heavy items without a forklift is exposing the City to potential personal injury claims. The approximate cost of a new forklift is $20,000; a used forklift is $9,000. The addition of a forklift was not included in the Fiscal Year 1989-90 Operating Budget. However, because of the need, as well as the safety factor in trying to prevent injuries caused by lifting heavy loads, we recommend the purchase of a forklift. Respectfully submitted, ~~CÂAJ Donna Heishman Budget Director Attachment _ ISSUED BY TH E CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HilLS, TEXAS I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of J:{òrth Richland Hills December 27, 1989 TO: C.A. Sanford Assistant City Manager FROM: George C. Tucker Director of Management Services SUBJECT: Forklift for Service Center Since the Service Center's opening in January 1987, we have been in need of a forklift. The Center is equipped with a loading dock for freight trucks, but we have no way to unload them. There have been numerous arguments between truck drivers and city employees when large pallets have to be unloaded. Most facilities with loading docks for large trucks have a forklift. Presently there is a very high risk of personal injury from employees having to man-handle every object. The subject of employees unloading trucks was also addressed in Management Policy Number CMA-0021 dated October 24, 1989. I talked with Briggs-Weaver Company located here in Fort Worth about different types of forklifts and options in purchasing one. After explaining our needs they felt a forklift with these specifications would best suit our needs: 1. Three ton lifting capacity 2. Gasoline powered 3. Pneumatic tires 4. 6" ground clearance If purchased new, a forklift of this type would cost approximately $20,000. Briggs-Weaver said that most government entities they work with use a lease-purchase option (approximately $330 a month) instead of a cash purchase. In order for the Service Center to operate effectively and safely, we need a forklift in the near future. (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 820609 . NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76182-0609 I Ie I I I ,I il I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JANUARY 22, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order January 22, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. Present: Tommy Brown Richard Davis Lyle E. Welch Mack Garvin Frank Metts, Jr. Charles Scoma Byron Sibbet Linda Spurlock Staff: Dennis Horvath C.A. Sanford Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Greg Dickens Absent: Rodger N. Line 2. ROLL CALL Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer City Manager 3. INVOCATION Councilman Welch gave the invocation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 8, 1990 APPROVED Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the minutes of the January 8, 1990 City Council meeting. Motion carried 6-0; Mayor Pro Tern Davis abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 5. PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS None I Ie I I I I I I I 'Ie I I I I I I I Ie I January 22, 1990 Page 2 6. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilwoman Spurlock removed Item No.8, Councilman Garvin removed Items No. 26 and 27 and Councilman Scoma removed Item No. 25 from the Consent Agenda. 7. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22 & 23) APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. 8. PS 89-23 REQUEST OF CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION FOR REPLAT OF LOTS lR, 6R THRU 9R, BLOCK 11, AND LOTS 1 THRU 4, BLOCK 12R, FAIR OAKS ESTATES, 2ND FILING (PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH OF OLD BURSEY ROAD AND WEST OF KELLER SMITHFIELD ROAD) DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE Councilwoman Spurlock asked who the triangle would belong to if the road was abandoned. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the map showed it was dedicated for public right-of-way. Councilman Scoma asked if that would also include the road right-of-way also. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated no. Mr. McEntire stated that if it was abandoned it would go to the adjacent property owners. Councilman Scoma stated the City already owned the road right-of-way. Mr. Dickens stated he did not think it had to go back to the property owners. Mr. Dickens stated it still could be City right-of-way. Councilwoman Spurlock asked if the City could accept the land with the stipulation that the funds would be donated by the landowner for landscaping. Mr. Robert Rowley, Teague, Nall & Perkins, Engineer, appeared before the Council. Councilwoman Spurlock asked Mr. Rowley if they would be willing to donate $5,000 to the City for landscaping the property. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I January 22, 1990 Page 3 Mr. Rowley stated he would have to check with the owners. Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Scoma, to deny without prejudice, waive the re-filinq fee, staff to negotiate on the landscaping of the area in question dedicated for right-of-way. Motion carried 7-0. 9. GN 90-10 PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED FEES AND POLICIES FOR IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE APPROVED Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. Mr. John Albury, 7909 Hunter, appeared before the Council. Mr. Albury stated he wanted to protest the green fees. Mr. Albury stated the average golfer played on weekends and would not be able to afford to play. Mr. Albury stated the surrounding area golf courses were not as high as the fees being proposed for Iron Horse. Mr. Albury urged the Council not to approve the must ride rule. Mr. Warren Condra, 7458 Meadow Court, appeared before the Council. Mr. Condra stated he was protesting the cost of the carts. Ms. Susanne Lamond, 4917 Tamara Court, appeared before the Council. Ms. Lamond urged the Council to approve the proposed fees. Ms. Cindy Martin, 6325 Riviera, appeared before the Council. Ms. Martin stated she felt the proposed fees were adequate. Ms. Martin stated she did not want her taxes raised to subsidize the course; the golfers should pay for it. Mr. Dick Bartek, 4901 Pebble Court, appeared before the Council. Mr. Bartek stated he did not know what the fees needed to be, but he did not want the citizens to have to pay for the course with taxes. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to accept the fees and policies as outlined by RSL (Recreational Services Limited). Mr. Sanford gave a breakdown on the fees and policies. I Ie II I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I January 22, 1990 Page 4 Councilman Scoma stated he would like for the Council to consider reducing the cart fee for senior citizens. Councilwoman Spurlock stated she would like to see a $2.00 discount for North Richland Hills/Haltom City citizens; also the age lowered to 60 years of age for senior citizens and a cart fee discount. Councilwoman Spurlock moved to amend the motion to allow a $2.00 discount to North Richland Hills/Haltom City citizens. The original movant or the second did not accept the amendment. Councilwoman Spurlock moved to amend the motion to lower the age to 60 for senior citizens and the cart f~e for senior citizens to $10.00 for one person and $16.00 for two people on non-prime time. The original movant and the second accepted the motion. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated he appreciated the comments from the citizens. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated one reason the City decided to build the golf course was to bring in development to help with the tax base and it had. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated the second reason was to provide recreation to the citizens. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated he felt the proposed fees were fair and that the course needed to be in operation for one year before any discounts were given. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated he had a strong obligation to all of the taxpayers of the City not to put the City into any kind of financial jeopardy. Councilman Welch stated he had been on the Ad Hoc Committee since its inception and had vowed it would not be a burden to the taxpayers. Councilman Welch stated he did not think discounts should b~ allowed the first year of operation. Councilman Metts stated he served on the Ad Hoc Committee and he would also like to see lower rates. Councilman Metts stated he felt the course should be in operation for one year before any discounts were given. Councilman Sibbet stated he felt the golf course should pay for itself and felt the course should be in operation for at least one year before discounts were considered. Councilman Garvin stated he felt experience in the operation of the course was needed before discounts were considered. Mayor Pro Tem Davis called for the question. Amended motion carried 7-0. *10. GN 90-11 AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR FRAMING LABOR - IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I January 22, 1990 Page 5 *11. GN 90-12 AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR LABOR ONLY TO FORM, PLACE STEEL, POUR AN~FINISH CONCRETE FOUNDATION - IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE APPROVED *12. GN 90-13 AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR PLUMBING - IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE APPROVED *13. GN 90-14 REQUEST TO REPLACE AUDIO-VISUAL TECHNICIAN WITH CHILDREN'S LIBRARIAN APPROVED *14. GN 90-15 TARRANT COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION 1990 SINGLE FAMILY BOND PROGRAM - RESOLUTION NO. 90-03 APPROVED *15. GN 90-17 AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR ELECTRICAL - IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE APPROVED *16. GN 90-18 APPROVE PARTICIPATION IN TEXPOOL - RESOLUTION NO. 90-04 APPROVED *17. GN 90-19 AWARD ON CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL FOR IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE APPROVED 18. GN 90-20 ACCEPTANCE OF DEED ON TWO TRACTS OF LAND APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve GN 90-20. Motion carried 7-0. 19. PU 90-02 AWARD OF BID FOR ONE TON PICK-UP TO BRUCE LOWRIE CHEVROLET AND THE FIRE FIGHTING UNIT TO CASCO APPROVED I ,I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I January 22, 1990 Page 6 Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve PU 90-02. Motion carried 7-0. *20. PU 90-03 AWARD OF BID FOR 1990 FORD VAN TO SOUTHWEST TRUCK SALES APPROVED *21. PW 90-05 APPROVE PROPOSED 1989/90 EXPENDITURES FOR COUNTY OVERLAY PROGRAM PER INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT APPROVED *22. PW 90-06 ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR WATAUGA ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TESTIMONY IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT APPROVED *23. PW 90-07 STREETS TO BE RESURFACED UNDER THE 1990 COUNTY PROGRAM APPROVED 24. PW 90-08 PUBLIC HEARING - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT - RESOLUTION NO. 90-02 APPROVED Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Scoma asked if the funds could be used for beautification or road improvements. Mr. Horvath stated the funds could be used only in low income areas and the City had very few qualifying areas. Councilman Scoma asked if the resolution was approved if the City would only be accepting the funds and not designating the use. Mr. Horvath stated the funds would be designated for the Senior Citizens Center. Mr. Horvath stated the City would first have to designate City funds to fix the roof and electrical before the County would participate with CDBG funds. Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to approve Resolution No. 90-02. Motion carried 7-0. 25. PW 90-09 APPROVE BUDGET FOR 1990 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY FOR CITY POSTPONED I !Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I January 22, 1990 Page 7 Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to deny PW 90-09. After discussion, Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to postpone PW 90-09. Motion carried 7-0. 26. PW 90-10 AWARD OF BID FOR BEACH STREET CONNECTION BOOSTER PUMP STATION APPROVED Mr. McEntire stated the original bid of Onyx Construction did not have the number of calendar days. Mr. McEntire stated staff felt this was an oversight and Council could approve waiving this requirement. Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve the bid of Onyx Construction and waive bid time requirement. Motion carried 7-0. 27. PW 90-11 REMODELING OF GLENVIEW FACILITY APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to allocate the funds. Mr. Horvath asked if the staff could go ahead and bid out the roof, plumbing and electrical. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated yes, take bids and bring them back to the Council. Motion carried 7-0. 28. CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mr. Cliff Stevens, 9201 Kirk Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Stevens stated his home was heated by propane gas and the cost had risen considerably. Mr. Stevens asked that someone from the City contact Lone Star Gas Company and see if there was a possibility of running a gas line to his house. Mayor Brown advised Mr. Stevens that the City staff would check with Lone Star Gas Company. Councilman Scoma asked how many homes could be served if the line was installed. Mr. Stevens stated approximately eight homes. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I January 22, 1990 Page 8 Mr. McEntire stated it would have to be cost effective before the Gas Company would install the line. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked Mr. Marty Streiff, Recreational Services Limited, to introduce the golf pro that had recently been hired. Mr. Streiff introduced Mr. John Ericsson and advised they did have 43 applicants apply. Mr. Streiff stated he would be sending weekly reports and surveys on the golf course to the Council. Mr. Bill Smith, 8409 Springbrook Court, appeared before the Council. Mr. Smith stated he would like to take his children to play golf but felt the fees were too high. Mr. Smith stated he understood the bond and how much money had to be paid. Mr. Smith asked the Council to look at the cost involved in running a profitable course and not just make money. Mayor Brown advised Mr. Smith the fees would be looked at after the course had been in operation awhile. Mr. Massey, 5509 Woodview, appeared before the Council. Mr. Massey asked how many memberships had been sold. Mr. Sanford stated the City had sold 53 memberships and had cut off the sale of the memberships until the fees were set. Mr. Sanford advised only 150 memberships would be sold. Councilman Garvin stated the number was set at 150 so the golf course would not be overcrowded during prime time. 29. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Brown advised the Council would reconvene in Pre-Council. Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I NORTH RICHLAND HILLS LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES January 18, 1990 The North Richland Hills Library Board met in the board room of the library on January 18, at 7 p.m. Present were Jan Daniels, Jay Bradshaw, Roxie Hamilton, Clyde Zellers, Kay Schmidt, Alisa Wood, and Arlita Hallam. Absent were Polly Brinkley and Bob Hardy. Chairman Jan Daniels called the meeting to order. Clyde Zellers moved, Alisa Wood seconded, and the motion carried to approve the minutes of the October 19 meeting. Arlita Hallam reviewed the library director's report included in this month's mailing: --The grant request to the Texas Department of Commerce for $54,500 to train literacy volunteer tutors via video was not awarded. --We have applied to the Hudiburg Foundation for a $15,000 grant to barcode the library collection. --Following discussion on young adult programming and services, the Board decided to informally survey middle-school age needs and report on their findings at the February meeting. --An inservice training session will be planned for staff and board members on emergency management/shelter training. --Arlita exhibited a sample directory of city services similar to the one that the library will be compiling for NRH. --The library will host a "Taking Care of Business" breakfast for the Northeast Tarrant County Chamber members on Wednesday, February 7, at 7:30 a.m. --The request to replace the vacant audio-visual technician's position with a children's librarian's position will be on the City Council agenda Monday night, January 22, at 6:00 p.m. The Library's Plan of Service for 1989-94 was revised to delete objectives accomplished in 1989 and add 1995. Kay Schmidt moved, Clyde Zellers seconded, and the motion carried to accept and put into final draft form the revised Plan of Service. The revised five-year plan will be presented to the City Council at its February 12 meeting. Following the biennial Output Measures survey in March, the Board will reconsider the extended hours and electronic database objectives. Alisa Wood recommended sending library program announcements to all NRH schools for inclusion in their PTA newsletters. The Friends of the Library annual report was received. The annual Friends meeting will be held in the Library Board Room at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, February 20. The Library Director will investigate the legality of enclosing invitations to join the Friends group with new library cards. The draft of "Excellence in Library Service" for the North Texas Library System was distributed. It will be thoroughly discussed at the January 26 area meeting at NRHPL beginning at 9:30 a.m. The draft will be voted upon at the April 26 system meeting in Decatur. Board members are urged to attend both meetings. Jan Daniels led a discussion on ways the library board members can be actively involved in short-term library projects, such as making council members aware of library needs and progress, surveying young adult needs, or discovering community programming needs. The next meeting was scheduled for February 15, at 7 p.m. This meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Approved by Library Board: Date Chairman Attested by I· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I PLA.N OF SER"VICE NORTH HICHLAND HILLS PUBLIC LIBRARY 1990 -- 1995 I· I Ie Introduction I The North Richland Hills Public Library began as a fledgling in 1971 in a Richland Plaza storefront. From there, it entered its developmental stage in 1975 by moving into its own structure within the Municipal Complex at 7301 Northeast Loop 820. In September, 1985, the citizens of North Richland Hills passed a $40 million bond referendum, which included the purchase of the former Richland Hills Church of Christ complex at 6720 Northeast Loop 820 for a public library and recreation center. The new library held its grand opening on September 26, 1987. I I The PlanninR Process I In January of 1983, the North Richland Hills Library Board selected eleven members from different segments of the community to conduct the first needs assessment and begin the 1984-1988 Planning Process. The guideline for this project was A Planning Process for Public Libraries, published by the American Library Association in 1980. I I Major recommendations of the 1984-88 Plan of Service were: Ie I 1. To provide Tuesday and Thursday evening hours 2. To provide library services to young adults (through programming and one-on-one assistance) 3. To prepare a Sesquicentennial program in 1985 for 1986 4. To increase the book and video tape collection -- especially to add multiple copies of best-sellers 5. To provide an automated circulation system by 1985 6. To assist citizens in obtaining a high school diploma-- by setting up a GED program and expanding our GED materials collection 7. To improve access to library services for special groups which cannot use the facilities -- such as the home-bound 8. To annually review and update the Plan of Service with the Library Board 9. To maximize the use of volunteers in the library 10. To improve library facilities, especially access to the bookdrop I I I I It is significant that all of the Plan of Service recommendations had been accomplished at the end of the planning period. I I Ie I I ~ ~ I Ie Plannin~ Process 1989-1995 I The successful completion of the previous five-year plan and the move into the new library gave the impetus to begin a new planning process, rather than add to the 1984-88 Plan of Service. Staff conducted a study of community data, to provide background information for the Library Board, which served as the 1989-94 planning committee. I In the fall of 1988, the Library Board and Staff chose the desired roles which they felt the North Richland Hills Public Library should fulfill in the community: I PRIMARY ROLES: Independent LearninR Center: The library supports individuals of all ages pursuing a sustained program of learning independent of any educational provider. Reference Library: The library actively provides timely, accurate, and useful information for community residents. Popular Materials Library: The library features current high-demand, high-interest materials in a variety of formats for persons of all ages. SECONDARY ROLES: Formal Education Support Center: The library assists students of all ages in meeting educational objectives established during their formal courses of study. Preschooler's Door to Learning: The library encourages young children to develop an interest in reading and learning through services for children, and for parents and children together. I I I Ie I I The Library's Mission Statement was adopted by the North Richland Hills Library Board on January 25, 1989. It reads as follows: MISSION STATEMENT I The North Richland Hills Public Library shall be innovative, professional, and nurturing as it creates a positive commitment to serving the continuing informational, educational, cultural, and leisure needs of the community. The library shall be a major source of information for the residential and business community by providing current and basic print and non-print materials and professional assistance to develop and enhance the interests, skills, and informational needs of all ages of library patrons; by developing community awareness of the library and its services; and by being a referral linkage to other informational resources. I I I I Ie The library promises to be informative, challenging, inspiring, and rewarding to all who use it. I I I 1_ 3 In June of 1989, the Library Board adopted Goals and Objectives for 1989/94. They were revised on January 18, 1990, to delete 1989 and add 1995 objectives: I GOAL I: The library shall provide a m1n1rnum of three library resources per capita to meet state and national standards and patron demands. I I Objective A: To increase the collection by 18,000 items per year (19,200 less 1,200 average withdrawal rate) reaching the three per capita minimum (177,921) by 1995. 1989/90 = 47,206 population = 89,051 materials = 1.89 per capita 1990/91 = 49,411 population = 107,051 materials = 2.17 per capita 1991/92 = 51,718 population = 125,051 materials = 2.42 per capita 1992/93 = 54,133 population = 143,051 materials = 2.64 per capita 1993/94 = 56,661 population = 161,051 materials = 2.84 per capita 1994/95 = 59,307 population = 179,051 materials = 3.02 per capita Population estimates are based upon the North Central Texas Council of Government's compound annual growth rate for the North Richland Hills of 4.67% per year. I I I I_ I I Objective B: To supplement the city's budget for basic library resources through fund-raising programs of the Friends of the Library and the solicitation of state, federal, and private grants and contributions to raise a minimum of $20,000 per year for library materials. I I I Objective C: To purchase materials requested by two patrons in one year through interlibrary loan. I I I_ II GOAL II: The library shall provide sufficient knowledgeable and approachable professional, technical, and support staff to promptly assist patrons in accessinR information and library resources. Objective A: To add circulation staff in 1992/93. I 4 I Ie GOAL III: The library will provide a friendly, welcomin~ atmosphere to help people of all a~es pursue a sustained proRram of independent learnin~. I Obiective A: To provide quarterly workshops, classes, seminars and learning exchanges to meet information needs of the community. I 1989/90 - To explore improving young adult programming and services. I Obiective B: To survey expanding the library's hours of opening to meet the needs of a diverse clientele, possibly adding Wednesday nights; opening at 9 a.m.; adding Saturday 5-6 p.m.; or adding Sunday afternoons. I GOAL IV: The library shall provide and maintain a timely and accurate collection of reference materials. I I Obiective A: To survey the need for ~nd subscribe to additional electronic databases in order to provide up-to-date information which cannot be kept current in print. Ie I Obiective B: To collect and preserve current and archival information relating to North Richland Hills through the regular solicitation of materials from schools and community agencies and the clipping of newspaper articles. 1989/90 - to begin a genealogical collection. I Obiective C: To contribute to the economic development of the area by providing marketing information for businesses interested in locating in the area and retention business assistance for those in the economic base. I I GOAL V: The library shall cooperate with other libraries to share resources and collection development responsibilities. I Obiective A: To participate in the creation of a union list of library materials in 1991/92. I Obiective B: To initiate and participate in the creation of an online network to locate and make accessible to patrons the holdings of nearby libraries by 1995. I Ie Obiective c: To initiate and promote the use of reciprocal library cards among area libraries by 1995. Obiective D: To cooperatively identify subject strengths and weaknesses of area library collection by 1993. I I 5 I Ie Ob;ective E: To share the responsibility of collection development so that 100~ of the materials needed more than once a year by a library will be available within a twenty-mile radius of this library. I Objective F: To provide referral assistance to area colleges and in-depth collections to meet demands for journals and other materials not in our collection by annually acquiring the holdings lists of the most accessible resource libraries. I I I GOAL VI: The library will assist students of all ages in meetinR the educational objectives of their formal courses of study. Objective A: To offer tours and formal instruction in the use of the library and library materials, I I Objective B: To provide classes in basic education, literacy, citizenship, and English as a Second Language for adult learners. Ie I Objective C: To provide automated indexes, a 10-year backfile of periodicals, and supplementary print and non-print materials to support student research by 1990. Objective D: To provide homework assistance, intergenerational learning experiences, and peer tutoring opportunities through the library's volunteer program by 1993. I I GOAL VII: The library shall encoura~e young children to develop an interest in reading and learnin~ through services for children, and for parents and children together. I Objective A: To provide weekly programs for preschoolers through á regular story time schedule, daycare story hours, and special programming. I Objective B: To encourage library use by preschoolers and their parents through publicity and public awareness. I Objective C: To provide after-school programs for children. I Ie GOAL VIII: The library shall provide a user-friendly and accurate database which shall conform to national standards. Objective A: To convert the collection material labels and patron labels to barcodes in 1990. I I~ . I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 6 Obiective B: To explore the incorporation of a program which would accept standard MARC records in 1992. GOAL IX: The library shall make every effort to keep the public informed of the full array of library services and materials available for their use. Ob;ective A: To prepare and circulate to civic organizations, schools, and churches a video program on library services in 1990. Obiective B: To prepare weekly news releases of library events and services. Ob;ective C: To provide public library information and training as a part of teacher in-service training and school library instruction beginning in 1990. I I ~epartment: Subject: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 2/12/90 Council Meeting Date: PS 89-23 Agenda Number: Economic Development/Planning Request of Centex Real Estate Corp. for replat of Lots lR, 6R thru 9R, Block 11, and Lots 1 thru 4, Block 12R, Fair Oaks Estates, 2nd Filing. This property is located north of Old Bursey Road and west of Keller Smithfield Road. This replat was continued from our last City Council meeting. The cover sheet from that meeting is attached for reference. Staff was directed to contact Centex representatives to see if: 1) they would consider contacting Mrs. Adiene Jones about deeding outlots 6 & 7 to her; or, 2) see if Centex would provide the City funding to landscape the outlots if Mrs. Jones would not want the parcels. Dick Perkins, engineer for the applicant, contacted the city and requests that the outlots be handled in the following manner: Centex has visited with Mrs. Jones about taking outlots 6 & 7. She appears to be reviewing this requeBt favorably, but, has asked that she be given time for her attorney to review the matter. e Centex would like to put a model home on Calvert Lane but cannot do so until the replat is approved. Centex has requested that Council approve the replat with the understanding that if Mrs. Jones does not want outlots 6 & 7 deeded over to her, that Centex will donate $2,000.00 to the City of North Richland Hills for the landscaping of the lots. May 1, 1990 would be a suggested deadline for Mrs. Jones' decision. RECOMMENDATION: I I It is the recommendation of city staff that the replat be approved based on Centex's agreement to escrow $2,000.00 for landscaping, pending Mrs. Jones decision. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) e Operating Budget Other . Þ..\~ w. ~_ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available .. {{J- .Ú!~ City anager I Finance Director Page 1 of I Ii e ~"'!partment: Subject: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Economic Development/Planning Request of Centex Real Estate Corp. for rpplat 1/22/90 Council Meeting Date: PS 89-23 Agenda Number: of Lots 1R, 6R thru 9R, Block 11, and Lots 1 thru 4, Block 12R, Fair Oaks Estates, 2nd Filina. This property is located north of Old Bursey Road and west of Keller Smithfield Road. The Planning and Zoninq Commission heard this case and held the required public hearing at their December 14, 1989 meeting. Dick Perkins, P.E., represented the applicant and responded to several questions of the p & Z as noted below: I I ~ 1) That Bursey Road South would serve mainly as an access road only to those property owners to the south. It was confirmed that the city has no plans to upgrade the road. e 2) That the asphalt portion of Bursey Road South adjacent to Lots 6 & 7 of the Oakvale Addition, would be removed and that section of the road closed. 3) That the developer, Mr. Stolty with Centex, had aqreed with adjacent property owners to provide new driveways to the.ir property. Mrs. Adiene Jones stated that her property was adjacent to out lots 6 & 7, and, that she would require 2 driveways. Mr. Perkins stated that Mr. Stolty with Centex will work with the property owners and if another driveway is needed, they will consi~er it, but if it gets too far west, they might not want to put two driveways. The replat was approved unanimously by P & Z subject to the following: a. Engineer's comments. b. The portion of old Bursey Road being elimi c. New driveways being built as outlined abov . d. A covenant being signed for the street. ~RECOMMENDATION: ~ an It ;s rpcomrnended by city staff that the City Council ~e condit.ions as outlined by the Planning and Zoning Comm~~~~~. ~ . I I Source of Funds: 1 Bonds (GO/Rev.) ,_ :'perating Budget Other I ~w.~ I Department Head Signature I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review - Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available - . Finance Dtrector I I Ie I I I I I I I,'e I I I I I I I Ie I --------~- ~- en :x :Þo ....... n....... %:t;J c rt1n x...... ...... CI)(/) (xtsr. ~ ...... - .. .... IXt. r-: I I "-2. 142. AG I Ie I R-2 tOl I R-S- 1500 R-2 I I I AG -75-3-- -.. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS DECEMBER 14, 1989 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL OATH OF OFFICE ON OF THE MINUTES BER 9, 1989 1. PS 89-?3 PRESENT: Chai rman Secretary Members The meeting was called to order hy Chairman, Mark Wood, Ma Wood vid Barfield Don Bowen Ron Lueck Pat Marin Georqe Anqle Alt. Member Dir. Eco lC Planni P & Coordinator Bob Miller Wanda Calv~rt James Brock Don Collins Beverly Reed, Notary, administered the Oath of Office to new alternate member, George Angle. Since there are absentees, Mr. Angle will be voting. Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Barfield and the motion carried 5-0 with Mr. Angle abstaininq since he was not present at the meeting. Request of Centex Real Est~te Corp. for replat of Lots lR and 6R thru 9R, Block 1], Lots 1 thru 4, Block 12R, & out Lots 6 & 7, Fair Oaks Estates, 2nd Filing. PUBLIC HEARING Chairman Wood opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishinQ to speak in favor of this reolat to pleas~ come forward. Dick Perkins with Teague Nall & Perkins, came forward to r~present Centex in their request. I Page 2 I p & Z Minutes December 14, 1989 Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Mr. Perkins said basically, they are just trying to clean up the property. He said it has changed owners several times and they had to change the right of way and width of the road. Mr. Perkins stated they have made some changes since the original platting. Chairman Wood stated the Commission is concerned with the out lots. He asked why they didn't give them to the adjacent property owners. Chairman Wood stated the out lots would cause a traffic problem at the two ends of Bursey Road and Bursey Road South. Mr. Perkins stated the area of that right of way would be just asphalt, not curb and gutter. Mr. Miller stated he could not tell why the City Staff agreed with that in 1985. Chairman Wood stated it creates an island. Mr. Perkins stated that Bursey Road South is to be used as a driveway access. He said that pavement will be removed. He said some day they plan to vacate and deed back to the property owners. Mr. Perkins stated that the owner will be required to sign a covenant running with the land that he would pay his share if Bursey Road South is ever rebuilt. Mr. Barfield stated he has real problems with the street names Bursey Road and Bursey Road South. He said there would be problems with addressing. Mr. Perkins stated there would not be any houses on Bursey Road South going north, but if you want it renamed, you should contact the people who have lived there for years. He said keeping Bursey Road through the subdivision matches the Thoroughfare Plan. I' I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 3 p & Z Minutes December 14, 1989 PS 89-?3 APPROVED ? PS 89-(7 ftdiene Jones, 7512 Bursey Road, came forward. She said her property joins out lots 6 & 7 as shown on the last submission of the replat. She said they had promised to put her in a driveway. Mr. Perkins stated the plans show a concretp driveway up to Ms. Jones' north property line. Ms. Jones stated she do~s want to discuss this ònd make sure of what they promise. Mr. Perkins stated that Mr. Stolty w;~h Centex will work with the property owners and if another driveway is needed, thpy will consider it, but if it gets too far west, they might not want to put two driveways. Chairman Wood called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this plat to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PS 89-23 subject to the engineer's comments and the portion of old Bursey Road be eliminated, new driveways be built, and a covenant signed for ~he street. He suggested th~y get together for a name change of the street. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the motion carried 6-0. Chairman Wood stated be heard y. Request of Owen D. & Mary E. Long for preliminary plat of Lots 1 & 2, Block 33, and Lots 1 & 2, Block 34, Fox Hollow Addition. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of ~rth Richland Hills \ December 7, 1989 REF: fWM-115-89 MenD to: Plarming & Zoning Conmission From: Gregory W. Dickens, P.E. Director of Public Works/Utilities Subject: PS 89-23; REPLAT FAIR OAKS ESTATE, Second Filing Lots l-R, 6-R, 7-R, 8-R, & 9-R, Block 11; Lots 1, 2, 3, & 4, Block 12-R and OUt Lots 6-R & 7-R We wish to make the following additions to the previous IœIOO fran our depart:rœnt on the subject replat which was dated ~vember 13, 1989. 1. Item 7. concerning Bursey Road South construction or escrow of funds should also state that the City ~ld allow a covenant to be signed by the owner of the lots adjacent to Bursey Road South. '!he covenant would state that the property owner at the time the street is improved wi th curb and gutter would pay his fair share of the cost. '!he covenant would run with the title to the property. 2. It should be clarified that pro rata on the 16" waterline adjacent to the total south end of Fair Oaks Estates, Second Filing as platted in 1985 (PS 89-39) was never paid as required in all previous engineering review letters. '!he reason was the property was never fonnally "developed". Prior to beginning construction on street, drainage, water and sewer improvements for Fair Oaks Estates, Second Filing, the water line pro rata will be due. 1,558' X $5.50 = $8,569.00 cc: Mr. Bob Miller, Director of Econanic Developnent (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 . NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I II I I I Ie I 81 7 336-5773 u?J CT~'JC¡C¿~ T!\f~~L Aryl! G~ENRfíEl'1~ November 28, 1989 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: Replat of Fair Oaks Estates, 2nd Filing PS 89-23 Dear Commission Members: We are in receipt of Mr. Johnston's review letter for the subject subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. We have responded to Item 1 , 3-6, and 8 of this letter, and those recoDDDendations for corrections have been made on the enclosed copies of the replat. 2. Regarding Item 2, our surveyor has discussed the second paragraph of this requested easement dedication with your Mayor Pro Tem, Richard Davis, and pursuant to North Richland Hills' Ordinance 1579, Section 1-03C3(b) , Mr. Davis has informed us that this paragraph should not be included in the dedication statement. However, the other statement in the dedication instrument provided to us has been included on the face of this plat. 3. Regarding Item 7, it has been our understanding since our client purchased this property from Hamm & Associates that previous approval of this portion of the subdivision did not include the need for construction of Bursey Road South (1248.67 feet). It was our understanding that the revised alignment of Bursey Road through this property, which is to be constructed with the second filing plat and this replat, would become the new Bursey Road, and that the owners of the property to the south of Bursey Road South would simply use the existing paving section as a means of access to the new Bursey Road construction. Therefore, we do not believe it is necessary for our client to escrow the proposed amount of $57,088.28 for future improvements of a road that is not planned to be improved. 915 Florence Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills November 28, 1989 Page Two We appreciate your consideration of this replat, and we will be present at your December 14, 1989, meeting to answer any questions you may have regarding same. Very truly yours, TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC. JRP/kfs Enclosure o~ hard Perkins, P.E. cc: Mr. John Johnston, P.E., Asst. Dir. of Public Works, City of NRH Mr. Steve Stolte, Centex Real Estate Corp. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of ~rth Richland Hills \ NOvember 13, 1989 REF: IW4-110-89 MenD to: Planning & Zoning Commission From: John A. Johnston, P.E. Assistant Director of Public Wbrks Subject: PS 89-23; REPIAT FAIR OAKS ESTATES Second Filing Lots l-R, 6-R, 7-R, 8-R & 9-R; Block 11 Lots 1, 2, 3, & 4; Block 12-R and Out Lots 6-R, & 7-R I have reviewed the referenced document and offer the following carments: 1. The surveyor's signature should be added to the plat. 2 · The attached easanent dedication should be incorporated into the description prior to the O'ÑI1er's signature. 3. The utility easement along the rear property line of IDts 6-R, 7-R, 8-R and 9-R Block 11 should be 7.5 feet wide. 4. At all street intersections, there should be a min:i.mum ten (10') foot corner clip sidewalk and utili ty easement diagonal to the street right-of-way lines. 5 · The ownership of the property east of Bursey Road South should be shown on the plat. 6. The existing zoning of the replated property and all adjacent property should be shO'Ñl1 on the plat. 7 · The developer should construct his portion of Bursey Road South (1,248.65 feet) or es~ $57,088.28 for the future improvements of the road. (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 . NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS 76180 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 PWvi-l10-89 November 13, 1989 8. Out Lots 6-R and 7-R do not meet minllnum lot sizes and should œ dedicated as Right-of-Way. ()~~ â.¡ð-I//l~~ r/ ~ JAJ/lc cc: Mr. Greg Dickens, Director of Public ~rks Mr. Bob Miller, Director of Econanic Developœnt Mr. Kevin Miller, Asst. Director of Utilities I I I I I I I I I Ie I ;:1 I I ;\1 -I I I 'tl CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Subject: 2/12/90 Council Meeting Date: Calling City Council Election, Resolution No. 90-06 A d N b GN 90-21 gen a urn er: The attached resolution is submitted for the purpose of calling an ~lection to be held on May 5, 1990, for the election of a Mayor and City Council Places 2, 4, and 6 and the election of Judge of the Municipal Court. This el~ction will be held in con,iunction with the Charter Amendment Election previousl.v called by Ordinance No. 1652. The resolution also provides for the appointment of plection judges. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 90-06. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget ~~r, _ ( ) JI/}- '---~¿~~ /~ v Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available /.) I __ - ~ ('/J -!"-/' r .,/1 / ,~ ...""'-..... ; / /'-7-- ..,../ , City Manager . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I !I I I I I I Ie I RESOLUTION NO. 90-06 BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, by the City Council of North Richland Hills, County of Texas, that said City election bp called for the election of Mayor and three (3) Council persons to Place 2, 4, and 6 and for the e1ection of Judge of the Municipa1 Court for said City as provided by the laws of the State of Texas. Section 1. That said election be held on the 5th day of May, 1990, A.D., between the hours of seven o'c1ock a.m. and seven o·c1ock p.m. Section 2. Qualified persons may file as candidates by filing with the Mayor, in the office of the City Secretary, between the hours of eight a.m. and five p.m., Monday through Friday, on or before March 14, 1990. Section 3. Voting shall take place at the following locations for the following voting precincts: Precinct Nos. Polling Locations 3214, 3324, 3333, 3041, 3364, & 3366 3215, 3140, 3326 & 3289 3209, 3063, 3049, 3177, 3367 & 3387 City Hall - 7301 Northeast Loop 820 Fire Station - 6801 Glenview Drive Fire Station - 8300 Starnes Section 4. That the following named persons shall serve as election officials: Election Judge: Assistant Judge: Assistant Judge: Assistant Judge: Alternate Asst. Judge: Cal Luper Susan Burk Sherry Arnold Jane Bell Bob Bartley and such clerks as may be needed and appointed by the Election Judge. The following persons are appointed as the Absentee Ballot Board: Chief Judge: Member: Member: Cal Luper Jeanette Rewis Susan Burk Section 5. Absentee voting shall commence April 11, 1990, at 8:00 a.m., and shall continue Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. through May 1, 1990. Such absentee voting shall take place in thp office of the City Secretary in the City Hall. (The Conference Room and the City Council Chambers shall be considered an extension of the City Secretary·s office for absentee voting.) I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Resolution No. 90-06 Page 2 Section 6. All qualified voters residing within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills, County of Tarrant, State of Texas, shall be entitled to vote at said election. Section 7. This election will be held in conjunction with Charter Amendment Election called by Ordinance No. 1652. Section 8. The election shall be conducted pursuant to the election laws of the State of Texas. The City Secretary is directed to procure voting machines, if available, for the election on May 5, 1990, and voting machines are hereby adopted as the method of voting at such election. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills this 12th day of February, 1990. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City I I I I I I I I I I ·1 I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: BUdget/Finance 2/12/90 - Council Meeting Date: GN 90-22 Agenda Number: Subject: Transfer of Funds Sufficient funds are available from City Council Reserve for Contingency and may be appropriated as follows to provide for participation in the National League of Cities Conference as discussed at the Council meeting of January 8, 1990. Fran : Ci ty Council Reserve for Contingency 01-99-01-5970 $4,000 To: Travel/Assn Dues/Meetings 01-01-01-4100 $4,000 Reconmendation: It is recarmended that the above transfer be approved. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget 1- Other [4 I I Departm --x--- Acct. Number rìvSyf~iCi~nt Funds Available ~ ~~~ -4 , ""'~ ~,"anceD"ector e /1 --p ' (/1 / /¿,¡,~_ ad Signature I cift Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM see above Page 1 of 1 I' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Anepartment: Economi c Deve 1 opment Council Meeting Date: 2/12/90 ~ AEGON - Request for Variance to Allow the Grazing of I Subject: Horses and Cattl e 011 C-2 Zoned Property Agenda Number: GN 90-23 I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I hi AEGON formally requested the above variance in a letter dated January 16, 1990. AEGON contacted city staff in December of 1989 seeking clarification as to whether or not the approximate 58 acres they own which will not be built on immediately would be able to maintain its agricultural tax exemption. AEGON's local legal counsel has advised them to seek the subject variance with the hope that the tax rollback would not be triggered on the undeveloped land. In staff's initial review of AEGON's Tax Abatement application last year, two assumptions were made, as follows: a) that no agricultural rollback taxes would be paid on the undeveloped property. b) that future taxation on the land would be based on true market value, not on agricultural value (based on consultation with TAD officials). Recent discussions with TAD officials have proven that assumptions "a" and "b" cannot both be valid. If AEGON, as a corporate entity, were granted an agricultural exemption on the property, not only would the rollback tax not be kicked in, but, we now are informed that the land would be taxed at agricultural value from this time forward until changed. Last year, staff had given Council a review sheet which indicated that the city would receive $10,200 in property taxes in YR 1 of the tax abatement and $20,451 in YRS 2 thru 10 of the tax abatement. As outlined above, this is not the case and the city would not realize these tax revenues unless the agricultural exemption is rescinded, which cannot happen without triggering the rollback tax. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Oth~ -~ Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available t?1(L¿~ . .-/ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Pa e 1 of I' . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ie 'I Page Two Since it is not possible to tax the land at true value without triggering a massive tax rollback which was never contemplated by either the City or AEGON, there is an equity argument in favor of granting the variance. The issue of whether or not horses/cattle are grazed seems to be a substantial part of TAD's decision making process. Once again, staff never assumed that this rollback tax would be paid. Other items which Council may want to consider in reviewing this variance request include: 1. AEGON is presently considering the construction of a second building on the property to be utilized by a second AEGON subsidiary. 2. AEGON's work on the property to date has already stirred other development interest. AEGON has fielded several inquiries into possible development on the site and city staff has referred one major development inquiry to them. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council make a determination on on AEGON's request for variance. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I Ie I I I ronment would not qualify as an agricultural use. Op. Tex.. Att·y Gen. No. J~- 87 (1983). I Sec. 23.52. The the of the ization me so determined may not exceed other methods.. The chief cordi to this the appraised value each category of shan make each g for apprai chapter C this (c) The cmef appraiser parcel of open-space land land has qualified for by S apter C of res a reap raisal. I I a C of this that downer and value accor to the pre- avail to a person seeking to a this subchapter or as provided by Sub- Ie I not change the appraised value of a the owner has or and the as provided by subchapter or ter or unless the change is made as a I I op a e appraisal land meets the conditions 23.51 of this code. The r by a majority vote of a committee cials or their designees: the governor, the agriculture General Land Office. For the pnrposes of Section 23.55 of this praiser also shall detennine market value of open" space land and I record both the market value and the praised value in The not within I I I See. 68. of minerals or subsurface of s to I Ie Cross References: Valuation of open-space and agricultural lands, see SPrB Rule See. 161.1. Sec. 23.53. Capitalization Rate. The used in I I I e I PART I. I INTRODUCTION I I I I I Ie I I I II I I I Ie I ~ ~ Until the 1960's, Texas farm and ranch land was taxed on its market value-the price a buyer would pay for it in an ordinary market transaction. As Texas became more urban- ized, however, farm and ranch land in many cases increased dramatically in value, espe- cially in developing areas. Even if a farmer or rancher never intended to develop his land, its value increased because it could be developed. Concerned that taxes could become so high that farmers and ranchers would be forced to abandon agriculture, voters in 1966 approved the first agricultural appraisal law. A consti- tutional amendment added Section I-d to Article VIII of the constitution. This section pro- vides that certain kinds of farm land be appraised not at their market value but at their pro- ductivity value-a value based solely on the land's capacity to produce agricultural products. In many cases, this amendment substantially reduces taxation of land that qual- i fi e s . Section I-d is very restrictive. It applies only to land owned by families or individuals. Agriculture must be the owner's primary occupation and primary source of income. In ear- ly years, procedures for administering the special appraisal varied widely. .~t~n~t~~:i~~~~=~~~~1~·;~~~4.fiím~b~:i'~~;~·· : appr81sal. Corporations 8S well 8S IndiVf(fúã)s' may, qualIfy under I-d-l. The Income an' occupation tests don't apply, and the new law also applies to timber land. (The State Proper- ty Tax Board publishes a separate manual-Guidelines for the Valuation of Timberland- describing application, qualification, appraisal, and rollback procedures for timberland.) The new constitutional amendment took effect in 1979. In enacting the Property Tax Code that same year, the legislature adopted Secs. 23.51-23.57, implementing Section I-d-l. The Property Tax Code assigns most agricultural appraisal responsibilities to the chief appraiser. However, Sections 23.41 and 23.52 of the Tax Code direct the State Property Tax Board <SPTB) to develop agricultural appraisal manuals for both I-d and I-d-l land and distribute them to appraisal districts. Section 23.52 of the Tax Code also directs the SPTB to develop procedures for verifying that land qudlifies for agricultural appraisal. This manual sets out both appraisal pro¿edures and eligibility requirements. The methods described in the manual are required; appraisal districts are required by law to follow them. Examples and figures are illustrative and not mandatory. This manual has been adopted under the board's role-making power. A committee composed of the Governor, : ':~ ~f;:!'~ ;ç.:::-:~" < ...;' . .' ".. , ", :';',~ SectIon 23.41 (b), Property Tax::Cod~'~~~.~;J::,-: >;¡'settlng forth this method of app~aising qualified open-) AppraIsal. '. ·~Et~ì~';{/.. . "",. space land, ~nd each. ~ralsal. ?fflce Sh~' use the appral-' ';'~1 (b) The State Property Tax Board shaß promulgate rules . sal manuals In appraising qualified open space land. The, ) specifying the methods to apply and the procedures to State ,Prope~ Tax Board by rule shall develop ~nd the 'ï use in appraising land designated for agriaJllural use. appraisal office sha~l. enforce ~roc~ures t~ ~~rlfy that ~ ., .;t'¡§~ #i:' .' .J land ,meets the con~ltlons contained In SUbdJvISJO~ (1) of 1 . ';~ih~~·,·.> Section 23.51 of this code. Th~ ~ies, before takln~ ef- . SectIon 23.52(d). AppraIsal of Qualified' '. feet, "'!ust be approved ~y a m~J~rrty vote o! a co,!,mlttee Agricultural Land. '~~~.,.-. . ~.;~~ ",. ' . " comprised of the following officials or the,r designees:' 1 ":.:~~~^ " the governor. the comptroller, the attorney general, the (d) The State Property Tax Board by rukhhall develop agriculture commissioner, and the Commissioner of the' and distribute to each appraisal offlceappraIsaJ manuals General Land Office. :_C' :~'~~':'~. ' . .~'.;4 AGRICULTURAL APPRAISAL MANUAL 1 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I ·e .1 I the Comptroller, the Attorney General, the Agriculture Commissioner, and the Commis- sioner of the General Land Office has app~oved it. The manual contains six parts: I. Introduction: an overview of the laws and introduction to the manual II. Qualification of Land: qualification standards and application procedures under the newer Section I-d-Ilaws III. Agricultural Appraisal Process: methods and procedures for appraising land under Section I-d-I laws IV. Rollback Taxes on l-d-l Land: when land's eligibility ends under the Section 1- d-1 laws, and procedures for calculating a rollback tax v. Agricultural Appraisal under Section led: qualification standards, applica- tion, and rollback procedures under the older laws VI. Appendices, FigÚres, and FormS: Questions and answers, text of the agricultu- ral appraisal laws, description of the owner-operator budget method, an example show- ing how to develop an agricultural appraisal system, and model forms. THE AGRICULTURAL APPRAISAL LAWS The agricultural appraisal laws have a number of popular names. The new Section 1- d-I laws (Art. VIII, Sec. l-d-1, Texas Constitution, and Sees. 23.51-23.57, Property Tax Code) are often called "open-space" laws, because the sections use the term "open-space land." They are often also called I-d-l laws, after the number of the section.f the constitu- tion. Because 95 percent or more of the eligible land in Texas now qualifies under the new- er law, this manual emphasizes its procedures and requirements. The o~r laws are still in effect, and occasionally land does qualify under them. These laws are often called "ag- use" or I-d laws (Art. VIII, Sec. I-d, Texas Constitution, and Secs. 23.41-23.46, Property Tax Code), In this manual, when we refer to a procedure under the older law, we will refer to it as I-d, l-d agricultural appraisal, or l-d productivity valuation to distinguish it from the newer I-d-I procedures. The special appraisal technique also has several popular names, including productivi- ty appraisal, special appraisal, and agricultural appraisal. We will use the term agricul- tural appraisal or productivity valuation throughout the manual. Several elements are common to both laws: · A property owner must apply for agricultural appraisal. The owner must file a spe- cial form with the appraisal district before the deadline. · The agricultural appraisal applies only to land, fences, and certain appurtenances. It doesn't apply to improvements or equipment. · The chief appraiser must act on each application he receives and notify the property owner if he denies the application or needs more information. · A property owner can appeal denial of agricultural appraisal to the appraisal review board. · Land that receives agricultural appraisal is subject to a tax penalty (the "rollback tax") when taken out of agricultural use. Land appraised under l-d is also subject to a rollback if it is sold or otherwise transferred to a new owner. There are also some key differences in the two laws: · I-d requires the property owner to reapply every year. I-d-! requires reapplication only when the property changes ownership or agricultural-use class or when the chief appraiser requires a new application. 2 STATE PROPERTY TAX BOARD I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ." · I-d requires the property owner to be an individual. I-d-! allows both individuals and corporations to qualify. · I-d requires that agriculture be the owner's primary occupation and principal source of income. The property owner must show that agriculture is conducted for profit. I-d-! has no occupation, income, or profit requirements. Instead, it focuses on whether the land is used to the degree of intensity typical in the area for a particu- lar agricultural enterprise. · I-d requires that land be devoted principally to agriculture for the three years im- mediately preceding qualification. I-d-! requires devotion principally to agricul- ture for five of the seven preceding years. · I-d requires a rollback tax when the property is taken out of agricultural use or when it is sold. The rollback recaptures taxes for the three preceeding years. I-d-I requires a rollback tax only when agricultural operations cease or the use changes, and the rollback recaptures taxes for the five preceding years. The roles of tax officials are the same under both laws. The chief appraiser: · creates a land classification system covering each type of agricultural land typical in the district; · calculates typical net income, based on a variety of sources, for prudently managed agricultural operations; · determines land use and degree of intensity standards for qualifying land; · provides applications and acts separately on each agricultural appraisal applica- tion; · appraises each property and prepares appraisal records listing information on ag- ricultural property; and · notifies the property owner of the appraisal district's actions if the Property Tax Code requires it. The tax assessor: · calculates taxes on the property; · delivers tax bills as u8ual; and · calculates and delivers a rollback tax bill when the rollback tax becomes due. ~ i j á AGRICULTURAL APPRAISAL MANUAL 3 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Part II. QUALIFICATION OF LAND UNDER SECTION I-d-I The Texas Constitution permits special agricultural appraisal only if land and its owner meet specific requirements defining farm and ranch use. Land won't qualify sim- ply because it is rural or has some connection with agriculture. Neither will it qualify be- cause it is open land that has no other possible use. The law does not guarantee a tax break for everyone who makes a Jiving from the land. Casual uses such as home vegetable gar- dens or hobby farming do not really constitute agriculture. Section 23.51 of the Property Tax Code sets the standards for determining whether land qualifies: "Qualified open-space land means land that is currently devoted principally to agricultural use to the degree of intensity generally accepted in the area." To qualify his land for agricultural appraisal, the property owner must show the chief appraiser that his land meets the Sec. 23.51 standard. To do so, the property owner must ap- ply for the appraisal. The owner must give the chief appraiser all the information he needs to determine whether the land qualifies. The property owner must also inform the chief ap- praiser of any changes in the status of his land. AGRICULTURAL APPRAISAL MANUAL 5 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I · Producing crops for human food, animal feed, or planting seed or for the production of fibers. · Floriculture. Floriculture is the cultivation and management of ornamental and flowering plants. · Viticulture. Viticulture is the cultivation of grapes. · Horticulture. Horticulture is the cultivation of fruits, vegetables, flowers, herbs, or other pJants. · Raising or keeping livestock. "Livestock" means a domesticated animal that de- rives its primary nourishment from vegetation, supplemented as necessary with commercial feed. Livestock includes meat or dairy cattle, horses, goats, swine, poultry, and sheep. Wild animals are not livestock. · Raising exotic game for commercial use. Exotic game means a cloven-hoofed ru- minant mammal that is not native to Texas and is not "livestock." Raising such game may qualify, but must meet the primary use test discussed on page 8. This list is not exhaustive. Production of any commercialIy valuable livestock, fish, or poultry product probably constitutes agricultural use as welI. For example, the Texas Attor- ney General has ruled that "mariculture"-land used to produce fish and other forms of aquatic life-can qualify for an agricultural appraisal. Ope Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JM-87 (1983). Some agriculture-related activities that do not qualify land for agricultural apprais- al are: Harvesting native plants or wildlife. Harvesting shrubs that grow wild on the land- mountain laurel, yaupon, etc.~r harvesting or hunting native wild animals such as deer or turkey win not qualify land. Processing plants or animals. Activities that take place after the crop or animal has been raised and harvested do not qualify land for special appraisal. Activities such as pasteur- izing and bottling milk; fermenting grapes and bottling wine; or slaughtering, dressing, and packing meat will not qualify land for agricultural appraisal. By definition, any activities a non-producer carries out on agricultural products con- stitute processing. A non-producer cannot qualify property for agricultural valuation. For example, the operator of a grain silo who purchases grain for storage and re-sale cannot re- ceive agricultural valuation for the land the silo occupies~ Under certain circumstances, however, primary producers may also process agricul- tural products. In these cases, the land devoted to processing activities does not qualify for agricultural valuation. In such cases, the line between production and processing activi- ties can become extremely fine. Chief appraisers must be certain to gather all facts neces- sary for making an accurate distinction. No hard-and-fast rules clearly distinguish be- tween production and processing. In general, however, an activity must meet at least one of the following standards before it counts as processing: · Processing begins with those steps typica11y carried out at the first level of trade be- yond production. Storage or packaging for wholesale trade would constitute "pro- cessing," as would slaughtering livestock. The producer's interim storage prior to sale to a wholesaler or other middleman would not. Goods in storage would be ex- empt as farm products in the hands of the producer, and land devoted to storing them would be eligible for agricultural valuation. · Processing begins when primary agricultural products are broken into smal1er parts or combined with other products. Grain, for example, is processed when it is milled. Milk is processed when it is separated into butter, milk, and other dairy products. Grapes are processed when they are washed, sorted, or crushed. Vegeta- bles and fruits are processed when they are washed and packaged for sale at the \vholesa]e or retail level. · Processing begins when activities Occur that enhance the value of primary agricul- tural products. Milling grain, pasteurizing milk, and ginning cotton constitute processing. Packaging products for transport to market would not constitute pro- cessing, but packaging them for sale would. AGRICULTURAL APPRAISAL l\1ANUAL 7 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I DEGREE OF INTENSITY TEST: Land must be devoted to an agricultural use to the degree of intensity that is typical in an area The degree of intensity test measures whether the land is being farmed or ranched to the extent typical for agricultural operations. The previous section de ~ .:ribed whether a par- ticular use was primarily "agricultural." To receive a productivity (1' ;Jraisal, however, the land must also be used for an agricultural purpose to the degree or' ;: tensity typical in the area. This test is intended to exclude "hobby" farms or ranches and land on which token agricultural use occurs in an effort to obtain tax relief. The law does not state what degree of intensity qualifies a particuiar type of land. The chief appraiser must set the standards according to local agricultural practices. Because of the variety of soil types, climatic conditions, and crops in a state as large as Texas, no sin- gle statutory definition could cover all possible uses. Setting Degree of Intensity Stannards The degree of intensity test measures what the owner is putting into his agricultural enterprise-in time, labor, equipment, management, and capital-and compares it with typical levels of these "inputs" for the same type of enterprise in the area generally. To set degree of intensity standards, the chief appraiser should analyze each type of commodity production in his area. This analysis should break down the typical steps in producing the commodity and attempt to specifY how much time, labor, equipment, and so on is typical for each level. For example, farming dryland cotton requires tilling soil, planting, applying herbi- cides, and harvesting. Tilling soil requires a certain amount of specific labor and equip- ment, as do each of the other steps. The chief appraiser should try to determine the typical minimum levels involved for each step. Similarly, raising beef cattle requires fences, proper management of land for long- run forage, enough animal units to match the land's carrying capacity, and a herd man- agement procedure to get the animals to market. What kind of fencing is typical? How fre- quently is it maintained? How many animal units are typically carried? Degree of inten- sity specifications address these levels of input in detail for each step of the enterprise. Degree of intensity standards will vary from one type of agricultural operation to an- other. In most cases, property owners must prove that they are following all the common production steps for their type of operation and putting in typical' amounts of labor, manage- ment, and investment. However, an operation is not disqualified simply because it differs from the typical operation. Appraisers should not, for example, disqualifY a labor inten- sive farm because most comparable operations are capital intensive. The total effort final- ly determines whether a given agricultural operation qualifies, not the level of each separ- ate "input." Deiming an Area The chief appraiser's decision on what constitutes an "area" will define "typical" agri- cultural intensity. The size of the area can vary with the commodity. For a common crop, the chief appraiser may be able to look to farming practices within the county. Rarer crops may require the chief appraiser to consider a multi-county region to decide the typical agri- cultural inputs. Finally, where the landowner applies different practices than are typical, the chief appraiser should be careful not to discourage experimentation or innovation. The agricultural appraisal laws should not be interpreted to discourage innovations in agricul- tural production. TIME PERIOD TEST: The land must have been used principally for an agricultural use or timber production for any five of the preceding seven years The five out of seven years' use requirement is self-explanatory. Use principally for agriculture in any five of these seven years qualifies land for agricultural appraisal. A AGRICULTURAL APPRAISAL MANUAL 9 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie .1 under the same ownership in one county is reported on one form. N:> additional federal fil- ing is necessary until a later change of ownership or use Occurs. An example of the federal foreign investment disclosure form is found in Appendix F, Form 7. ECOLOGICAL LABORATORIES: Land used as an ecological laboratory may qualify for agricultural appraisal Land used principally as an ecological laboratory by colleges or universities may qualify for agricultural appraisal. The property owner must follow the same application procedures required to qualify other l-d-l land. The land must be principally used as an ecological laboratory. In determining use, appraisers should apply the same principles they use to identify the primary use of agricultural land (page 8). A model application for ecological labs is included in Appendix F, Form 3. APPLICATION: A property owner must file a valid application form To be valid, the application for agricultural valuation must be on a form provided by the appraisal district and adopted by the State Property Tax Board. The SPTB application form appears in Appendix F at the end of this manual (Form 2). The appraisal district may copy the SPTB form and offer it for use by local property owners. SPTB rules allow appraisal districts to use a form that varies somewhat in format and wording from the SPTB form, but the district's form must contain the same elements and ask for the same information as the SPTB form. The rules do not permit appraisal dis- tricts to add additional questions to the initial application. If, however, the initial applica- tion does not contain all the information the district needs in order to rule on a particular application, the chief appraiser can require the applicant to supply additional information. This procedure is described later in this section. Where the district offers its own form, the applicant may choose between the SPTB ap- plication form and the district's form. The applicant must completely provide all informa- tion that is requested on the SPTB form. Landowners must file applications with the chief appraiser in the appraisal district where the land is located. Taxpayers whose land is appraised by more than one appraisal district must file an application in each district. A property owner may file a single application form covering all tracts within an ap- praisal district. He does not have to file a separate form for each tract so long as he provides sufficient information to show that all tracts qualify under the Jaw. The chief appraiser should encourage the owner to file a single form if the owner is farming or ranching several tracts as a unit. The chief appraiser must view the entire ag- ricultural operation as a unit-not with respect to the activities on each individual parcel. The single application form notifies the appraisal district of the unity of operation. Other issues about the application process Filing Dcadline The deadline for applications is "before May 1," meaning the application form must be postmarked or filed no later than midnight April 30. For good cause and only on the proper- ty owner's request, the chief appraiser may extend the filing deadJine in individual cases for not more than 60 days. An extension should be granted in writing and must be request- ed before the May 1 deadline. The Property Tax Code does not define "good cause." However, it is commonly some- thing the applicant can't control. Being sick or injured and not able to transact normal busi- ness for a period that effectively prevents filing on time is usually goed cause. Being out of town on business or vacation or simply forgetting about the filing deadline is never enough. .;\GRICULTURAL APPRAISAL MANUAL 11 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie II I I I I I I Ie I Chief Appraiser's Action The chief appraiser must review each application and decide whether to: · approve it and grant agricultural appraisal; · disapprove it and ask for more information; or · deny the application. The chief appraiser must determine the validity of all timely filed applications before he turns all appraisal records over to the district's appraisal review board. The deadline is May 15 or as soon afterward as is practicabJe. The chief appraiser usually gives the appraisal records to the appraisal review board (ARB) by May 15. The ARB spends about two months reviewing them, including a review to make sure that all applications for agricultural appraisal have been correctly granted. Property owners who were denied agricultural appraisal may file a protest with this board. Taxing units that believe special appraisal was erroneously granted to any property owner may seek to remove that grant by filing a challenge with the review board. The chief appraiser must rule on all late-filed applications before the appraisal review board approves the records for the year. If he denies the application, he must notify the ap- plicant, in writing, within five days. This notice must explain the reasons for the denial and the procedures for protesting it. The applicant has 10 days from the date the notice is mailed to file a protest with the ARB. Additional Information If the initial application form does not contain all the information needed to determine whether property qualifies, the chief appraiser can request additional information. The ap- plicant must provide this information within 30 days after the date of the request or his ap- plication win be denied. If there is good cause, the chief appraiser may extend the deadline to allow additional information. An extension cannot exceed 15 days (see Appendix F, Form 6). When an Application is Denied If a chief appraiser denies an application, he must deliver a notice of the denial to the applicant within five days of the denial. The notice must contain a brief explanation of the procedures for protesting to the appraisal review board. A SUMMARy OF THE I-d-I APPLICATION PROCESS The property owner must file a completed application to qualify his land for agricultu- ral appraisal. · An application must be filed in every appraisal district where the owner's property is located. · Where the applicant owns several parcels of property within one appraisal district, he may file a single application form covering all the parcels. The deadline for fil- ing an application form is April 30. · The chief appraiser may extend the deadline 60 days. The applicant must request an extension and must show good cause for extending his deadline. · Good cause is generally a reason not within the applicant's control that prevents timely fi1ing. · Late applications may be filed any time before the appraisal review board approves records for that year. Late applications are subject to a penalty. · Failure to file an application before the records are approved for the year makes the land ineligible for agricultural appraisal in that tax year. · After the land is approved for agricultural appraisal, no other applications are ne- cessary unless the chief appraiser requests one or changes occur in the status of the property. AGRICULTURAL APPRAISAL MANUAL 13 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I . ... Continued from previous page Section 23.57. Action on ApPlications.> (a) The chief appraiser shaH dlÒ!¡:;~míne separately each .. .. ...... .. for ... applicant's right to have hi~ Jii -.' :; :~:;rai$ed tmderthìs Sec. 23.541. late Application Appraisal. . subchapter. Afler considering 1:".. ¡:;:);)Iicalion and all rei. ........ 8s.....:.A....9r..ìcultu..r.....8.....J....::.:.:land... . ... .. . f t 1M h f hit th I .......... evant In orms ion, e c ie ap:;>' v,er s au, as e aw.) (a) The chief appraiser shall accept and approve or deny and facts warrant: .. .. an application tor appra;sal under this sUbchapter after \/( 1) approve the application and aiiow appraisal under» the deadline lor filing it has passed if it is tiled before ap· ... th' bch .. . .... proval of the appraisal records by the appraisal reView. .. IS su apter;...... · board; .. //(2) disapprove the application and requestaddìtiona/> .' ....... .... :. information from the.apphcant in support of the cJaìm: or. . .....: ......·....i~~ ~~~::~~' j~7~:~ ~t~. ~~~~~~¿~~sì~i:~rt~~~d p~~:~..::.;i:){.(~)..de~Yt.~~....~rpiíc~!i~~.r:I./.......... ................/...;.;·::{...;}..i..:::¡·:.;·:. >tyof 1 0 percent otthe difference· between the amount ot·:U.(b ) If the chieLappraiser reqÙEists additional information) .taxìmposed 00 the . property and the· amount that would '!rUfrom.anappficant, the applicant must furoistl. it y,¡ìthitl 30:::, « pra i sal·record s ... ì nd ica ting · the· pe rson 's ·/iabil ity ... forthe·mat ionÞYViritte nord a rfor a sil}gle perìodnol to.exceed:t:. . ... penalty .and .shal'·deliver written notice of imposition of..15daYs¡::;.:.....:ii..:/..::::..:.../::??::::.. . the penally, ex PI.aining the reaso 0 fa rits í mpos it io n, to· ...... .. ... (c) Th echi~f :~~pr~ì~~; .. shade~er~ ì~ e . ~h ~ ~ ~íic1 ií~~f:. . the person. :. ... ................... . .. . . . ... .}.... each application for appraisal onder this subChapterfiled \. >.. .......... ....... ./> .... ..... ........ :. ....... ... .... ···withhimbaforehesubmitsthaappraiSalrecordsfoffe.:? (d) The taxasses~or10 r a taxing. un It that taxes land. view and determination' of protests asprovidedºYChap~: ·\~;þ~~~~:ns~~~r:~s:t ~~d:~~~~t s ~~~ :p~ e:n~f~~ r I~J ~:.......>u~er..1Vof..t~ì~..C:P? e: .......·>'.>i/.(>.:}UU.. ......::.:::...... . ........ owner' stax . bìHj}aodthet ax collector tor the unit sh aH:·(d)JLthech ief appr aiserdenìesan.. application/he~haU:: <coli act thepenaltyatth a .t; meandi n the manner he col·:.deliverawri!tennoticeolthede nìaltotheapplicanty,¡ithÐ:=::: ".... . i\GRICULTURAL APPRAIS.A.L 11ANUAL 15 I I .....0 0 N &.nO 0 ""' 0 ~ "(I) Q N "" Ie .. 00 Q ~ N N. M 0'\ ex) ,.... ..... 0 Q ~ N "'0 0 0 ;/ . (I) 0 "" '" I N f' 00 0 f' N N. M ~ co 0'\ ,.... I .....0 0 ~ N § ~o 0 '" 0 .ca C N '" 00 Q ~ N N.. r' 0'\ ex) Qþ ,.... .u I ca s ....0 ~ .. Q N .u "'Q 0 U"'\ 0 en . 51 .ca 0 N "" aJ Q I .. cn OQ 0 P-'I N U) ..... N.. M C"\ co ..... ØQ ,.... ..c .., c: ..... ~ 0 ~ N .u I ~ 0 U""I 0 ~ "0 §I . 0 ~ C"\ 0 <1J .. , .. ~ en 0 0 0 0 00 co N ,.., U""I 0 ~ .c ,.... 0 <J I ~ ... 0 .c =' ..... .., Q. .-4 0 &on N '" 0 .. 0 .., en 51 -4".. I .. .. 0\ ; Qþ 0 0 .. a ~ c ,., ~ Ie N 0 .u 0 0 en ..c ~ '8 u l. ... ~ CJ 0 Q/ .... ~ ~ 51 "'. 0 .... N ~ ..:t ----- I .. 0 Ln 0 ..... en 0 "..- .. 0 .. 0\ Qþ Qþ t:J 0 .. ..c >< N 0 Q 0 to \) Ë ;:j ,., '" 0 en .u (L ..... .... , f I ~ ~ "'" .... aJ .u N .., ,.. ~ ~I ~I 0 ~ 0 res GJ ~ ~ .. 0 ~ J ~I 0 .. 0\ ... C. "" 0 f' 0 ~ N 0 0 0 ~ ... 0 I M &on 0 Q. ,.... .., ........ ~ ci2 <J'- .~ aJ co Q ~ .... N .c c ;1 "" 0 .... 0 E-4 0 C'1 .. 0 an 0\ .u I .. 0 .. f' .. 0 0 "0 N 0 0 0 <.> "0 .., '" ~ ~ ca , '" aJ ~ I 0 an an 0 -.... "0 0 cf: ;] 0 I I 0 0 ~ 0 =' N ~ M \0 ..... ~ .. . aJ CJ (- 0 C'" N ~ .u C ..... P-4 N. ~ co .... CL ... I .u ~ 0 c: .., !I 0 0 I I ~ "0 I N 0 :z en N aJ en .., QJ co >< U) e e Ie tU taJ Q .. ..... en I en E-4 ~ cn-tC .&oJ .u Q) E Q) .... Cf.) rn >< .....m >< ~ ~ =tJJ N aJ tU ~~ ro U 0 e.. ~cc e.. ro ~ QZ c:: aJ Q) cu Q) ~ ~tzJ 0 > ~ ~ee .....~ I ~ ~:> 0 I ~ \6.4CUCJ to.., ~ U ~~ ~ ..c ~ <>:> c ~ ...-4 QJ coo C) o 0 o C) 0 ....; ~ CI) ~f a. "O"Cww cnc. a: < E-4 >< co OJ 0 ccc.c. .... 0 E-- CIJ < ~ ..c ~J w tU ro e ~ w t.-' 0 ~ E-t -Ie E-t Q., ..J..J .... ~ø.. II( E-- I ROHNE, HOODENPYLE, LOBERT Be MYERS I WAYNEA.ROHNE _JERRY R. HOODENPYLE JAMES E. LOBERT I THOMAS E. MYERS I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I- I ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 1323 WEST PIONEER PARKWAY - SPUR 303 ARLINGTON. TEXAS 76013 MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 13010 ARLINGTON. TEXAS 76094-0010 BOARD CERTIFIED - CRIMINAL LAW TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION ROGER L. HURLBUT LYNN ROSSI SCOTT STEPHEN C. MAHAFFEY BARBARA W. KERSH NANCY F. ARENSON February 5, 1990 TELEPHONE: (817) 277-5211 METRO: (817) 265-2841 TAX DEPT: (817) 277-0041 FAX LINE: (817) 275-3657 Mr. C. A. Sanford Assistant City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Dear Mr. Sanford: Per your request, I enclose herewi th a copy of Section l-d, Article VIII, the "pure" agricultural use exemption, and a copy of Section l-d-l, Article VIII, "Open Space Land," which authorized the Legislature to provide by general law for taxation of open- space land on the basis of its productive capacity. Section 23.42 of the Property Tax Code administrative guidelines for Section I-d. sets forth the Sections 23.51 et seq. of the Property Tax Code set forth the requirements for open-space land. I hope the constitutional provisions which I am enclosing are helpful to you. If I can answer any questions, please call. WAR: j g Enclosures tIJYOU~S truly, ~~. . · ~:~Jt''--~ wayZJ_' Rohne I CONSTITUTION u f .the homesteads exempted under ~essatl0n of the levy would impair the eld. .The legislature by general law resIdence homestead exemptions. to ad valorem taxes to market road and it is entitled to a under § 1- not entitled a second ';1 mestead. under subsec. s 'on, for that l 1inimum amount of such exem is } aUowed at an, but the maximum nJimited need to pro- Id. emption amount once fixed cannot be e year 80 as to xes assessed for that to the exemption, aboHshed or Art. 8, § I-d claim it o WhUe for to claim a . ure to c)aÎm the a date does not n the No. H-548. Persons must be 65 years on or before of the tax year order to for the 'Vhether school district must refund tax overpayments on the facta of each case. rd. An thiø section remains valid at the time of payment Under current a school district tax income ita recognition administra impracticable. MW-259. other than school diatrietø have r the tiOD of Tex.. to the amount of ad valorem taxes sed upon the residence homesteads of ersODa 65 or older. The correct method of determininr "the amount of taxes imposed in the preceding year on taxable value that is in the current under subd. of Tax Code, is mu) g the amount of the in the current year on tax- able value in the year by the year's tax rate, the amount of the in the current year Î8 deter- two wayø: is a or a total e um- ber used in calculation is simply the amount if the granted is a percent- to this Primary oeeupatlon 4 Time for filing statement 3.5 Use of land 2 Value 2..5 Void asses. menta 4..3 Law Review Commentaries Texas school taxation and 258 Notes of Decisionø Appeal 6 Burden of proof 5 Business venture 3 Construction and application Eminent domain 8 Evidence 5..1 I nstructions to jury 5..5 J .livestock 7 Natural persons Pleadings 4..5 CONSTI' or .ubsta: been had loeal tax erty as a~ suit to ref Intent persona 1'1 hood direr mg, and rendered other reti Independe 1978)495 Notwitt øeeuritya and divid. sion their time the Boil a sale of c' from deel culturalis' section.. Where aaaeslme other thE agricultu! of assess quired to rather th: the rende al ownen If a la gross ine occupatio multipJe purpose er than multiple the tax seSlment amendmt School I dismislef 581. In res} of prope be cODsi. which h( or atten1 In agricuJt' rem tax 2d 880. not entitled to Jtural ad valorem taxation for ich wild deer roamed and ate ation while the dl as owner, who land for eived only year from ed in excess of 000 a mineral and 'its. Bower v. I(APP' 4 Dist.1985) 697 Jity to fence to enable Be the land for to from ad valorem tax.. Y on which wild deer roamed vegetation and which was sub- ¡ng leases. Bower v. CONSTITUTION Art. 8, § I--d-l Dist. .. 697 8. Appeal Tax colJeetoyS application of this section' to fact raises but of law sub- review courts. y. Gaines S. W.2d n.r.e. for appeal from tax denial of agricultural classifi- cation to one will ed. Id. Court had to consider tax collector's denial of to certain land and to mandamus. Id. were the In suit to assessmen tion of ad valorem taxes except on an agricultural use ba- sis, there was no error in not to consider use of small ranch Jands in question for in de- whether or not used for agriculture. of this art. 4366c. Notes of Deeisionl Eminent domain I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Legal TU Electric Rate Case, Resolutlon No. 9U-UY or Resolution No. 90-10 Council Meeting Date: 2/12/90 Agenda Number: GN 90-24 Subject: The Council previously approved joining the TU Electric area cities consortium to test the subject rate request. The groups of cities, through the Steering Committee has recommended that this resolution be passed suspending the rate for ninety days. Approval of Resolution No. 90-09 will authorize our advance payment of 10æ per capita to the Steering Committee and will suspend the rates for ninety days for further study. We have received a request to prepare Resolution No. 90-10 as an alternate action. This resolution denies the rate request without further study. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 90-09. (This rate filing was made less than thirty days ago and we have been unable to make an intelligent evaluation in the short period of time. The package consists of 21 volumes.) I Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating BUdgkiet. - Other ~~~~ f IJ------) It:~/lfu~ (( Itll j/>vvJ Department Head Signature r Cit~~nager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Pa e 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I RESOLUTION NO. 90-09 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZE THE STEERING COMMITTEE OF TU ELECTRIC SERVICE AREA CITIES TO RETAIN LEGAL COUNSEL AND RATE CASE CONSULTANTS; AUTHORIZING THE STEERING COMMITTEE TO INTERVENE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS IN THE TEXAS PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY RATE CASE, RURAL RATE CASE, PUC DOCKET NO. 9220 (PRUDENCY INQUIRY) AND RELATED DOCKETS; SUSPENDING THE PROPOSED TARIFF AND SCHEDULE OF RATES OF TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY. WHEREAS, Texas Utilities Electric Company (TUEC) has filed with individual cities and the Texas Public Utility Commission (PUC Docket ) ("Rural Case") for an increase in rates, with such new rates to have a proposed effective date of February 20, 1990; and WHEREAS, TUEC has under construction a two unit nuclear plant project known as the Comanche Peak Nuclear Generating Station ("Comanche Peakll), which project cost is expected to be approximately $10 billion and potentially a major component of such rate request; and WHEREAS, on December 22, 1989, the Office of Public Utility Counsel filed a petition of inquiry (PUC Docket 9220) with the Public Utility Commission of Texas inquiring into the prudence, efficiency and management of Comanche Peak; and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, ("City") is a regulatory authority having a statutory duty to participate in such proceedings and whose citizens will be substantially affected by the rates established as a result of such proceedings; and WHEREAS, the economic development potential and competitiveness of the electric service area will be profoundly affected by the rates established; WHEREAS, the city is entitled to be reimbursed for its reasonable expenses pursuant to Section 24(a) of the Texas Public Utility regulatory act; and WHEREAS, the Steering Committee of TU Electric Service Area Cities has been formed to facilitate and coordinate the participation of Citi~s in the service area of TUEC in these rate proceedings; and WHEREAS, the Steering Committe~ is currently negotiating with TUEC for the periodic reimbursement of the Cities joint rate case expenses; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Resolution No. 90-09 Page 2 I . That the City authorizes the Steering Committee of TU Electric Service Area Cities of which the City is a participating member, to retain legal counsel and engage rate case consultants, and intervene on behalf of the City in PUC Docket No. 9220, filed by the Office of Public Utility Counsel, and PUC Docket No. (TUEC Rural Case) filed by TUEC, and related dockets. I I . The City authorizes payment to the Steering Committee of TU electric Service Area Cities of ten cents (10¢) per capita based upon the latest Texas Municipal League population figures for the City. I I I . In order to allow the City sufficient time to analyze and prepare for hearing and decision on any requested rate, the City council of the City hereby suspends the operation of the proposed tariffs and schedules of rates which have been filed with the City which would otherwise go into effect for a period not to exceed ninety (90) days beyond the date on which the schedule of rates would otherwise go into effect, i.e., suspension until Midnight, May 21, 1990, and for such additional period of time as may be necessary and authorized by law. During such period of suspension, the rates in force shall be those rates in effect when the suspended schedule was first filed, and shall continue in force until finally approved, modified or denied by the City Council. IV. The City Secretary shall cause copies of this resolution to be sent to the TUEC representative: T. Michael Ozymy Vice President Texas Utilites Electric Company 2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1900 Dallas, Texas 75201 and the Chairman of the Steering Committee: llay Doegey City Attorney Post Office Box 231 Arlington, Texas 76004-0231. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Resolution No. 90-09 Page 3 PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of February, 1990. APPROVED: Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire - Attorney for the City I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I RESOLUTION NO. 90-10 WHEREAS, Texas Utilities Electric Company (IITU Electric") filed a schedule of increased rates with a proposed effective date of February 20, 1990; and WHEREAS, after consideration of the increased rates, the City Council finds that the filing in its entirety and that such schedule of rates should be in all things denied and disapproved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1 . In its capacity as a regulatory agency the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, acting by and through its City Council does hereby in all things disapprove and deny the schedule of increased rates filed with this City which were to have become effective February 20, 1990. 2. The City Secretary is directed to send a copy of this Resolution to the following IITlJ Electric" representative: T. Michael Ozymy Vice President Texas Utilities Electric Company 2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1900 Dallas, Texas 75201 PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of February, 1990. APPROVED: Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire - Attorney for the City I . I Department: I -SUbject: I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works Approve Speed Limit on Shady Grove Road 10 MPH Ordin3nao No. 1659 Council Meeting Date: 02 / 12 /90 Agenda Number: GN 90-25 The Public Works and Police Departments are in agreement that the speed limit for Shady Grove Road from Smithfield Road to FM 1938 (Davis Boulevard) should be set at 40 mph. By State Law rrArticle XIX. Speed Restrictions, Section 166. Paragraph 2.", the existing speed limit could be construed to be 60 mph due to the adjacent area not meeting the rrurban district II definition as described by the State. Recommendation: The staff recommends the Council approve Ordinance No. 1659 for the general safety of the public. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operati g Budget Oth Finance Review Acct. Number N/ A Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director 'Î . 'J ,nU 1'// '/l .J lJV' /(_'111 ._ / ~ nt Head Signa ure I City~anager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: SECTION 1 There is hereby declared a 40 mile per hour maximum pirma facie speed limit upon the public street in North Richland Hills, Texas known as Shady Grove Road from its intersection with Smithfield Road, east along the common corporate limit line of the City of North Richland Hills and the City of Keller; south approximately 700'; then east to its intersection of Farm to Market Road 1938 (Davis Boulevard). SECTION 2 Any person operating a motor vehicle in violation of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not in excess of $200.00. SECTION 3 This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its date of passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1990. APPROVED: Mayor Tommy Brown ATTEST: City Secretary Jeanette Rewis APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY AND FORM: City Attorney Rex McEntire I . f,,~ I. "" I I I I I I Ie I I I I I 1---l,.2 I Ie I r-- -- ~~ ':..~-, ~ . ~\ t I ~ j -! j f t ¡l { f j t ,-4 { ~ / ~- I I 4 ~ !. ~ \ ~ \ r \ '\ ~ \ \ ( t \ r ~ ) \ \ J 1 ~ ¡. J ~ './I ,- / L..... .,.,t ! ~, i .J 61, ç¡ I Lr;..~ - . ..-~ _~u - ~--L~ -4' -l u L, I~ ~' 1---- ---.., L - //'\., /' ) ¡ I I I ~ n1!.li - I.' ; II '::-.. H I I I I, _____..... ¡ \ "'" ~' I L~_ " ,: ' · ; I I I : ---1 I ~, / / / I /1 ~t¡ r------ <I i , 101 ' , I~i ^ /~'<,>r T IT!~ ^, . ..~ ~,;~! ,~/ -J't--:1~_~~,_ ": " - "-;$". - /' Y ';:::::¡¡¡¡:, ~ ~ .:¡j . m:'':;:; '-/ I' . ~_~ " I I ......- ' ~ - ~~~ '. - - ~"----,: . -------~ -_.- ~~~ -_._--~. - . . . :- I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance C 'I M . D 2/12/90 ouncl eetlng ate: ubject: Property Tax Refund Agenda Number: GN 90-26 The Texas Property Tax Code Section 31.11 (a) requires that refunds over $500 be approved by the governing body. The following refund request has been received. Taxpayer Alan Young Buick Amotmt Reason for Refund $2,827.67 Land value lowered by Tarrant Appraisal District Four Seasons Nursing Hare 649.96 Double payment received Recorrmendation: The tax office recarmends approval of the refunds as outlined aOOve. ~ Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) IlIA Operating Budget X ..., Other 0 - * ~ /7l~~~ ~ . Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM {t~ Acct. Number 01-00-00-4862 Sufficient Funds Available - ~ ~~~ I~ 1(~ ¿~ City Manager ~ Fmance Director Page 1 of 1 I- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1 _epartment: I Subject: I I I I I I Ie I II I I I I I I- I Public Works Council Meeting Date: 02/12/90 Agenda Number: GN 90-27 Approve Amendment to Ordinance No. 722, Rcgul~ting "No P~r](ing" Zono on Marilyn La.na Ordinance No. 1660 The attached ordinance amends Section 5.04 of Ordinance No. 722. The ordinance designates a specific section of the 6700 block of Marilyn Lane as a "No Parking" zone. Over eighty (80%) percent of the property owners signed the attached petition requesting this portion of the street be designated as such. Recommendation: The staff recommends the Council approve Ordinance No. 1660 which establishes a "No Parkingll zone on Marilyn Lane from Rufe Snow Drive east to and including 6737 Marilyn Lane only along the north side of the street during the hours of 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on school days. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other N/A Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I Finance Director -;ct: , -î' W j/'; ?j~;/ '- /C~J:( /--A.~~ ent Head Signature ' City flanager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I- I Ie I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I- I ORDINANCE NO. 1660 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS that: SECTION 1 Section 5.04 of Ordinance No. 722 shall hereafter read as follows: "Section 5.04 stopping, Standing and Parking Regulated To stop, stand or park at any time upon any public street, alleyway, other public place or firelane when signs are erected or curbs painted giving notice of that stopping, standing, or parking is prohibited; The following street shall be a "no parkingll zone from the hours of 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on days school is in session. Marilyn Lane from Rufe Snow Drive east to and including 6737 Marilyn Lane only along the north side of the street." SECTION 2 Any person violating any portion of this ordinance shall be subject to a fine not in excess of $200.00. SECTION 3 This amendment to Ordinance No. 722 shall be in full force from and after its date of passage and publication as required by law. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of _____1990 APPROVED: Mayor Tommy Brown ATTEST: City Secretary Jeanette Rewis APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY AND FORM: City Attorney Rex McEntire '---'...J ~ I I I I I- I I I I I I Street I I I I I I PETITION FOR NO PARKING SIGNS We the undersigned, residing at or owning property at the address indicated below, have inspected the attached drawing and having fully read this petition do hereby agree to the following: I Marilyn Ln. I I- I Marilyn Ln. arilyn Ln. Marilyn Ln. ¡I,~ ---:4/rf-<~~+-- I Marilyn Ln. ./ ~tari lyn Ln. v' 6717 ï1arilyn Ln. 6721 Marilyn Ln. / 6725 Marilyn Ln. 6729 Marilyn Ln. Marilyn Ln. 1) The following street(s) would better serve the neighborhood and general public if traffic was limited to "No Parking - 7:30 AM - 4:00 PM School Days Only" 2) In as much as I am in agreement with "No Parking" traffic during the hours indicated, I hereby relinquish my right to protest the referenced change. 3) I understand that if more than 80 percent of the property owners in the attached target area sign this petition then the following street(s) will be changed as indicated: Marilyn Lane from Rufe Snow Drive to 61~1 Marilyn Lane Address Resident or Owner Printed Name Signature 6741 I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance 2/12/90 Council Meeting Date: GN 90-28 Agenda Number: Department: Subject: Updating User Fees - Ordinance 1658 City Council requested that a review of the City's current user fee structure be conducted to determine if the overall fee schedules were applicable in todays market. Our current fee structure was based on a comprehensive study by lewis McLain. That study was divided into Levels I, II and III. The level I fees were approved by City Council in August 1987 and levels II and III were suggested as possible future revenue sources. The staff review plan as outlined in IR 89-06 was to distribute copies of that study to each applicable department for their review. Each department was instructed to review all fees currently in effect and Levels II and III to determine if adjustments were needed or if new fees were appropriate. I I I I I I I The following is a summary in column form that details our current fee, proposed fee, and the additional revenues that is estimated for fiscal year 1989/90. Current Proposed Additional Fee Description Fee Fee Revenue Building Permits 1. Update of Building Permits Valuation Data Sheet (currently uses 1986 Data Sheet, 1989 valuation is approximately 8% higher) 1986 Value 1989 Value $12,400 2. Alarm Testing Fee -0- $35 350 The inspections of alarm systems (item 2) are currently performed by our inspectors at no additional fee to the builders, although they do require additional time and effort. The proposed fee was identified as a Leval II fee in Lewis McLain's study. Community Development 1 . Da.y Care Centers -0- $35/annually * 770 2. Nursing Homes -0- $35/annually * 35 3. Hospitals -0- $100/semi-annual 600 * Each Additional reinspection fee will be $30 per trip. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ '>1Jl~..~ ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient ~... Available t71 0... ~....,... __ ;'~/ ¡>i!// (ß ' i '--.:, ,/' ,-~ ·t""'-l' . . f .' / ~ - Cirý Manager , Finance Director 2 I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I II he annual and/or semi-annual fees for the day care centers, nursing homes, and hospitals ere also suggested as Level II fees. The Texas Department of Human Resources has ~required those units be inspected as part of their state license. We have been II~ performing the inspections at no cost to each business. The inspection of day care centers and nursing homes may require several trips for reinspection for items not in compliance. The suggested $30 reinspection is the same as a reinspection fee currently enforced in the building permits area. That reinspection fee is usually charged after the second noncompliance inspection if the permit holder has not corrected any problem areas. We suggest that the same scenario be applied to the inspection of day care centers and nursing homes. The suggested fee for hospitals is substantially higher because of the time element and the possible need for two or more inspections to be involved. Fee Descri tion Current Fee Proposed Fee Additional R~venue Communit Center Annual User Fees 1 . Individual Patrons Residents $2/person $4/person $ 2,200 Nonresidents $25/person $25/person -0- Fami ly Group Residents $10/fam; ly $15/family 600 Nonresidents $40/fami ly $60/fami ly 385 Lost Card Fees $l/card $2/card 250 Temporary Use (Guest Fees) $1/card $2/card 1,325 2. The proposed changes to the resident individual and family resident and nonresident rates are suggested based on an area survey of other municipalities. Also there was some inequity for family membership in that it was more economical for a family to register as individuals. Environmental Services Animal Control Euthanisia Fee Residential Nonresidential $10/each $20/each deleted * deleted * Total Additional R~venues $ 18,915 ------- ------- * Deleted based on recommendation of Animal Control Ad Hoc Advisory Committee. With the exception of Community Center room rental fees, all other departmental fees (i.e. Library, Fire Department, Environmental Service, Police) were examined and determined to be in line with other area cities. At the last minute, it was determined that further analysis is needed of the Community Center room rental fee structure. Proposals for modification of these fees will be brought before City Council at a later date. I Recommendation: It is recommended that Ordinance No. 1658 be adopted. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I f' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I ORDINANCE NO. 1658 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORm RICHIAND HILLS, TEXAS, THA.T: 1. provided. The charges set out herein shall be ma.de by this City for the services Building Pe:r:mits A. New Construction 2. The building ¡:e:r:mi t fee shall be based upon the fonnula set out in the Unifonn Building Code as shown by Building Valuation Data dated April 1989, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and ma.de a part of hereof as if set out verbatim. Based upon the calculation of value of value frcm Exhibit "A", the fees shall be those fees shown on Exhibit "B", attached hereto, and ma.de a part hereof the sane as if set out verbatim. Separate fees shall be charged for building penni t fees and mechanical pe.nni t fees pursuant to the fonnula established herein. In addition, a $35.00 fee shall be charged for testing alann systems. B. Tenant Finish-OUt The building pennit fee shall be based on a minimum cost of $10.00 per square foot of leased space. C. The following annual or semi -annual fees shall be charged. Dëly Care Centers Nursing Hanes Hospitals $ 35.00 35.00 100.00/semi-annual Penni t Fees for Sprinkler Systems. Penni ts shall be required for sprinkler systems and the following penni t fee shall be charged. Systems are valued at $1.00 per square foot of coverage and the pennit fee shall be: $ 1.00- 500.00..........$ 501.00- 2,001.00.......... 2,001.00- 25,000.00.......... 25,001.00- 50,000.00.......... 50,001.00- 100,000.00.......... 100,001.00- 500,000.00.......... 500,001.00-1,000,000.00.......... 1,000,001.00-& over................ 15.00 15.00 + 2.00/1,000 45.00 + 9.00/1,000 252.00 + 6.50/1,000 414.50 + 4.50/1,000 639.50 + 3.50/1,000 2,039.50 + 3.00/1,000 3,539.50 + 2.00/1,000 (over minimmn) (over minimum) (over minimum) (over minimum) (over minimum) (over minimum) (over minimum) A $60.00 pennit fee shall be charged for alterations to existing sprinkler systems. I I f' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I Ordinance No. 1658 Page 2 4. Fire Investigation Fee. Pennits are required for intentional burning, blasting and fire~rks displays. The smn of $200.00 shall be made for each pennit. Fireworks displays sponsored by the City shall be exempt. 5. Special Vendors. Seasonal or tem¡x:>rary vendors with places of business located upon private property, including but not limited to Christmas tree lots and mall vendors, must procure a Special Vendor I s License fran the Ci ty . The following charges shall be made: One Yæek penni t. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 35. 00 OVer one week to one month............... 100.00 Over one nonth........................... 150.00 6. Planning & Zoning Fees. All applications for rezoning shall be accomplished by payment of a $300.00 fee. Variance and exception fees are hereby set at $100.00 for residential and $175 . 00 for nonresidential. Multi-family property shall be deened nonresidential. Platting fees shall be based upon the charges set out in Exhibit "e", attached hereto and made a part hereof the same as if set out verbatim. 7. Park and Recreation Fees. The following rental fees shall be charged for use of City facilities: Gymnasium........................... $15.00 per hour for half court 30 . 00 per hour for full court Carmuni ty Center Annual User Fees: 1. Individual Patron Resident.............................$ 4.00 per person Nonresident.......................... 25.00 per person 2. Resident..............................$15.00 per family Nonresident........................... 60.00 per family Lost card fee......................... 2.00 per card Temporary use ( Guest fees).......................... 2 . 00 per card I I f' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I 'I -- I I I Ordinance No. 1658 Page 3 The balance of the fees for teams, leagues, tournaments, classes and related activities shall be established by the Director, subject to approval of the City Manager, based upon number of participants, length of use of facili ties, type of activity, need for use of city personnel, perils, dangers and other cost factors. 8. Library Charges. Library cards shall be used free of charge to City residents. A $12.00 charge shall be rrade for all others. Book Replacement Charges: (lost or damaged) Actual cost of the book plus a $10.00 processing fee. Fines and Processing Charges for Overdue Books: 10¢ per day up to the cost of the book, plus $2.50 imposed as processing fee upon second notice and all subsequent notices. 9. Special Police Department Charges. Vehicle Impoundment and storage..............$10.00 per day Towing Fee Base charge wrecker pulls (normal)...........$45.00 Addi tional charges to base charge: Use of dollies............................ 25.00 Winching/waiting/standby hourly rate (15 minute increments) ............... 60.00 Drop drive shaft.......................... 15.00 Pulls 1 1/2 ton and greater............... 75.00 Waiting time first fifteen minutes, no charge. 10. Environmental Services. Penni t fees for food service establishnents (annual penni t) . 1 - 5 employees.........................$150.00 6 - 20 employees........................ 250.00 21 or more employees.................... 300.00 Reinspection fee........................ 25% of annual fee (A new fee shall be charged upon change in ownership) Temporary (up to 14 days)............... 50.00 Certification of Food Service Managers................. 10.00 I I f' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I - I Ordinance No. 1658 Page 4 11. Special Fire Department Charges. Basic Certification School..............$375.00 per student EMT School.............................. 150.00 per student (no charge for North Richland Hills firefighters) Ambulance Services: Local Distant $120.00 280.00 Resident .........................$ 80.00 Nonresident....................... 220.00 Plus i tanized charges for milage, drugs and expendable supplies. 12. These ordinances shall be in full force and effect fran and after March 1, 1990. 13. If any fee established herein is in conflict with any other ordinance, then in such event, this ordinance shall govern. 14. This ordinance is not intended to affect fees not specifically addressed herein and all other fees heretofore established shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED AND APProVED this 12th day of February, 1990. Mayor A'ITEST : City Secretary APPROVED AS 'ID FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney I I f' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I it I EXHIBIT liB" ro ORDINANCE NO. 1658 FEE SæEDULE BUILDING $ 1 - $ 500.........................$15.00 501 - 2,000.........................$15.00 for the first $500 plus $2.00 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000 2,001 - 25,000.........................$45.00 for the first $2,000 plus $9.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000 25,001 - 50,000.........................$252.00 for the first $25,000 plus $6.50 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000 50,001 - 100,000..........................$414.50 for the first $50,000 plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000 100,001 - 500,000..........................$639.50 for the first $100,000 plus $3.50 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000 500,001 - 1,000,000...........................$2,039.50 for the first $500,000 plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000 1,000,000 and up................................$3,539.50 for the first $1,000,000 plus $2.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof ADD 65% 'ID CC1v1MERCIAL ONLY FOR PLAN REVIEW FEE I I f' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I EXHIBIT fiB" PAGE 2 MECHANICAL Monetary Value of Proposed Vhrk Base plus Percentage of Estimated Cost $ 0 - $ 500..............................$ 501 - 1,500.............................. 1,501 - 3,000.............................. 3,001 - 5,000.............................. 5,001 - 50,000.............................. 50,000 - 100,000.............................. 100,001 - 500,000.............................. 500 , 001 or Ir\()re. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 50.00 + 100.00 + 200.00 + 700.00 + .009 .008 .006 .004 I I EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. 1658 Building Valuation Data -\t the request ot numerous budding officials, Building f'r:.tandard5 otters the toll owing building valuation data representing average costs tor most buildings. Because re5identlal buildings are the most common tor man v cit- Ies. two general classes are considered for these. one tor 'average' construction and the other tor "good." Adjust- ments should be made tor special architectural or struc- I ~urai features and location of the project. Often higher or ¡ower unit costs mav result. The unit costs are intended to complv with the defini- tion ot "valuation" in Section 423 of the Uniform Build- mg Code and thus include architectural. structural. elec- I trl~al, plumbing, and mechanical work, except as specificallv listed below. It also includes the contractor's profit which should not be omitted. The determination of plan check fees for projects re- viewed bv the International Conference of Building Of- I ficials will be based on valuation computed from these figures which were compiled in April, 1989. I Occupancy and Type 1. APARTMENT HOUSES: "T \i pe I or II F. R. .. . . . . T\'pe V-i\1asonrv ¡or T vpe III' . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-\Vood Frame. . . T, pe I-Basement Garage. . . . 2. AUDITORIUMS: Tv pe lor II F. R. .. . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe II-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . Tvpelll-1-Hour ........... Tvpe III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . TvpeV-N ................ 3. BANKS: *Type I or II F. R. .. . . . . . . . . . . . Type 11-1 - Hou r . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpelll-1-Hour ........... Tvpe III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T vpe V- 1 -Hou r . . . . . . . . . . . . TvpeV-N ................ 4. BOWLING ALLEYS: Tvpe 11-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe II-N.. .... ....... . .. . T vpe 111-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T vpe V- 1-Hou r . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. CHURCHES: T vpe I or II F. R. .. . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe 11-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe 11I-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . Type III-,\,¡ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V- 1- Hou r . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-N ................ 6. CONVALESCENT HOSPITALS: -Tvpe I or II F. R. .. . . . . . . . . . . . Type 1I1-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V- 1- Hour. . . . . . . . . . . . i. DWELLI NGS: Type V-Masonry. . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-Wood Frame. . . . . . . Basements- Semi-Finished.. . . . . . . . . .. Unfinished. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. FIRE STATIONS: Tvpe I or II F. R. .. . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe 11-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Typelll-1-Hour ........... Type III-N. .....,........ T vpe V - 1 - Hou r . . . . . Tvpe V-N ................ 9. HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY: Tvpe I or II F. R. .. . . . . . . . . . . . Tv pe 11- 1 - H ou r . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpelll-1-Hour ........... Tvpe III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . __ TvpeV-1-Hour............ Tvpe V-N ................ 10. HOSPITALS: - T vpe I or II F. R. .. . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpelll-1-Hour ........... Tvpe V-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . I I Ie I I I I I I I I Cost ~er Square Foot Good Average 581 .20 b6.70 66.10 33.00 39.70 ..17.10 28.00 78.30 53.50 52.80 59.40 56.60 34.40 51.80 1 1 1 .90 80.40 76.60 91.30 87.00 80.40 76.50 37.40 35.70 41.10 39.10 37.50 -3.90 55.20 52.50 59.30 56.40 54.00 51.40 1 04.80 7-L20 67.30 72.80 52.00 69.00 48.80 17.20 15.20 13.40 11.40 85.70 55.50 52.80 61.70 58.70 55.20 52.50 7i.30 61.90 59.00 64.80 61.70 61.60 58.60 122.70 102.10 94.60 " '\dd 0.5 percent to total cost for each story over three. BUILDING STANDARDS / September-October. 1989 11. HOTELS AND MOTELS: * Tv pe 1 or II F. R. . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe 1I1-1-Hour Tvpe III-N .. T\'pe V-1-Hour . . . . . , T\'pe V-N 12. INDUSTRIAL PLANTS: Tvpe I or II F. R. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tv pe 11- 1 - H ou r . . . . . . . . . . . . T\ pe II-\Stock} Tvpe 111-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe III-I'\; . . . . . . . . . . . . Ti It-up, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tv pe V - 1 - Ho u r . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-N ................ 13. JAILS: Tvpe I or II F. R. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type 1I1-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . T vpe V- 1 - Hou r . . . . . . . . . . . . 14. LIBRARIES: Type I or II F. R. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe 1I-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe II-i'\¡. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe 11I-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe III-N T\ pe V - 1 - H ou r . . . . Tvpe v-~ 15. MEDICAL OFFICES: * Tv pe lor ìI F. R . .. . . . . . . . . . . . hpe II-l-Hour Tvoe 11-·'\0 T\ pe 111-1-HoLJr T\pe 111-:\0 Tvpe V-1-Hour . . Tvpe V-'\; 16. OFFICES:"· "Tvpe or II F. R. T \. pe II - 1 - H au r . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe II-.'\J. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe III-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe II-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-1-Haur . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-N ................ 17. PRIVATE GARAGES: \Vood Frame. . . . . . Masonrv . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Open Carports 18. PUBLIC BUILDINGS: Tvpe I or II F. R. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tv pe 11- 1 - H ou r . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type 1I1-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . Type III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-N ................ 19. PUBLIC GARAGES: · Tv pe lor II F. R. .... . . . . . . . . . Tvpe II-N.... .. .... .... ... Tv pe 111- 1 - H ou r . . . . . . . . . . . T vpe III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tv pe V - 1 - H 0 u r . . . . . . . . . . . . 20. RESTAURANTS: Tvpelll-1-Hour ........... Tvpe III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-N ................ 21. SCHOOLS: Type 1 or II F. R. .. . . . . . . . . . . . Type 11-1 -Hou r . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpelll-1-Hour ........... Type III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T vpe V-1 -Hour. . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-N ................ 22. SERVICE STATIONS: Type II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type III-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Canopies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23. STORES: * Tv pe lor II F. R. .. . . . . Tvpe II-i-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . T vpe II-I\,¡. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe 1I1-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . Type III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-N ................ 24. THEATERS: Type I or II F. R. .. . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpelll-1-Hour ........... Tvpe III-N . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-1-Hour. . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-N ............... -* Deduct 11 percent tor mini-warehouses. -6.80 66.30 b3.10 ') 7.80 55.10 42.50 29.00 .2 7. SO 32.00 10.60 21 .40 28.90 27.40 120.00 1 09. 1 0 78.50 87.90 61 .40 38.40 66.90 63.70 60.00 57.10 62.90 38.00 37.10 -+ 5.90 43.70 36.40 34.70 82.20 59.40 56.50 33.70 51.20 25. WAREHOUSES:** Tv pe lor II F. R. .. . . Tv pe II or V - 1 - H 0 u r . . . . . . . . T\ipe II or V-,~. . . . . . Tv pe 11I-1-Hour . . . . Tvpe III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EQUIPMENT AIR CONDITIONING: Commercial. . Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SPRINKLER SYSTEMS. . . . . . . . . . . . 37.20 21.90 20.80 25.30 24.10 3.20 2.70 1.50 Regional Modifiers The following modifiers are recommended for use in conJunction with the Building Valuation Data. In addi- tion. certain local conditions may require further modifi- cations. To use these modifiers merely multiplv the listed cost per square foot bv the appropriate regional modifier. For example: To adjust cost of a Tvpe 111-1-Hour hotel building of average construction for the Iowa area, select Regional Modifier 0.80 and unit cost trom Valuation Data, $66.30. 0.80 x 566.30 = $53.00 (adjusted cost per square toot) 89.80 b6.80 63.70 -3.10 1)9.70 68.00 64.30 80.40 52.10 49.60 57.30 54.60 53.10 50.60 17.30 20.60 1 2.40 Eastern United States Connecticut. . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . District of Columbia, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Florida .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Georgia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \\aine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,\1arvland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \1assachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ew Hampshire .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New Jersey. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New York New York City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . North Carol i na. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pennsvlvania Philadelphia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rhode Island .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . South Carolina. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vermont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Virginia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \Vest Virginia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Central United States :\Iabama. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,Arkansas. . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Illinois........ .. . .... ... .. ... . .... Indiana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lo\va . . .. . . . . . . '. .. .... . .. Kansas ......... ................. Kentuckv .. .. .................... Louisiana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \.~ichigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \1innesota .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,V\ississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .V\issouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ebraska . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . North Dakota. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ohio............................ . Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . South Dakota. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tennessee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Texas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \ Visconsin ........................ Western United States ,Alaska. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Arizona. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cal ¡fomia Los Angeles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . San Francisco. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other .. . . . . . . . . . . . . Colorado .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hawaii.......................... . Idaho.. ...... .. , . .... .. . . .. .. .. '" ,\1ontana. . . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~evada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New Mexico ...................... Oregon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Utah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \Vashington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \Vvoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93.40 69.90 66.50 78.30 74.iO 69.20 65.90 36.90 21.70 26.10 24.90 21.50 69.80 66.50 61.80 58.90 84.00 59.90 60.40 37.50 35.20 52.40 49.80 50.00 43.70 19.20 Modifier 0.95 0.84 0.87 0.74 0.68 0.81 0.79 0.94 0.82 0.91 1.16 0.87 0.70 0.96 0.83 0.94 0.70 0.80 0.73 0.82 0.72 0.70 0.87 0.82 0.80 0.74 0.77 0.78 0.84 0.86 0.71 0.78 0.75 0.80 0.80 0.71 0.78 0.72 0.74 0.85 1.30 0.82 1.00 1 .13 0.94 0.81 1.14 0.80 0.79 0.89 0.76 0.83 0.75 0.88 0.80 u* Deduct 20 percent for shell-only buildings. 53 I I f' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I EXHIBIT "c" TO ORDINANCE NO. 1658 Plat filing fees shall be established at One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($120.00) per plat plus One Dollar and fifty cents ($1.50) per lot residential and Five Dollars ($5.00) per acre for nonresidential areas other than parks for which no fee is required. Inspection and laboratory fees shall be established as follows: A three (3) per cent inspection fee will be paid by the developer for all public improvements in all single-family residential subdivision. On other than single-family residential subdivision the fee shall be based on the following: Three (3) percent on all public improvements or Nine r:ollars ($9.00) per acre, whichever is the greater of the two (2). When any laboratory test shows a condi tion which does not meet specification, the developer shall pay for all tests required by the Ci ty 's inspector to detennine that the failing condition has been corrected. Preliminary Plat $120.00 plus $5.00 per acre or $1.50 per lot $120.00 plus $5.00 per acre or $1.50 per lot $120.00 plus $5.00 per acre or $1.50 per lot Final Plate Replat Street Vacation $100.00 $ 50.00 Easement Vacation Street Signs $ 65.00 per intersection Recording Fee Plats - $15.00; oversized plats - $30.00; covenants - $5. 00 per page ---- -, -.}" I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Parks and Recreation 02-12-90 ~epartment: Council Meeting Date: ~ Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan G~I 90-29 I Subject: Agenda Number: n with a population of 44,900 and approximately 60% of the city's land mass developed, North Richland Hills has come to a point where it is I essential to pursue a deliberate and responsive future development format for parks, recreation, open space and beautification of the City. The city of North Richland Hills is landlocked by six other I communities limiting the potential for expansion. The city must carefully plan in order to rectify any inequities from the past and to maximize the opportunities of the future. I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I ~] ...- A detailed planning process is needed in order to assure that we allocate our limited resources to the projects identified to have the highest priority. A Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan is a document that provides an inclusive framework for orderly and consistent planning; acquisition; development and administration of the parks and recreation resources, programs, and facilities of the agency. PURPOSE OF THE MASTER PLAN Provide detailed researched facts concerning the community and role of parks and recreation. - Establish priorities and statements of direction based on researched and documented facts. Not on opinion or hearsay. - Define short and long term goals. - To serve as a decision-making document. Decisions, problems, and questions are determined in relationship to the Master Plan. The Master Plan allows for a consistency in planning that can survive changes in governmental leadership. TYPICAL SERVICES - study of existing and future land use in relation to existing and future population demographics and residential growth. - Inventory and analysis of existing Parks and Recreation facilities. - Establishment of Parks and Recreation facility and program standards specific to North Richland Hills. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget _ . Other _ ~ _. ~-~~ ~ /2!/{1~ Department Head Signature f City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of I I I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I r I - Identify potential park and open spaces and recommend potential financial and implementation strategies. - Evaluation of possible school district/city cooperative program and discussion of benefits. - Creation of a planning base upon which future applications for grant monies are founded. - City beautification to include thoroughfares, medians, entry points, and public properties. - studies of operation and maintenance; guides for staffing and 111 a ill te11allce . - Creation of conceptual plans for existing and future parks. - Evaluatiolls of drainageways and easements for linkage parks and delineation of a trails system plan. - Create, conduct, compile, and analyze surveys of public opinion regarding parks and recreation needs and prepare presentations for l)tlb 1 i c lle a1- illgs . - statement of goals and objectives. - Development of land acquisition policies and priorities. - Propose statements of departmental policy. - Review applicable ordinances and legislation. - Discussion and recommendations concerning mandatory park land dedicatio11. BENEFITS OF A MASTER PLAN Guidelines for the acquisition and development of new parks, gI'eellbel ts, a11d opell spaces aI'e developed. - Recreation facilities and opportunities are equitably distributed throughout the City. - Improvements are made to respond to the inevitable community growth. - Guidelines are established for enhancing the community image. - Implementatioll strategies are developed to bring the plan to 1- e a 1 i t ~{ . - The health, safety and welfare of the North Richland Hills residents al-e impl-o".¡ed. - A better "qllal i ty of 1 if en e11V il~onll1e11 t is Cl-ea ted fOl~ N01-t11 Rie11l a11d Hills reside11ts. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , ··:,c, .... . .'.' ~" <. ,.~. ." . I' Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I r I The City Council has requested the Parks and Recreation Board and staff to research, draft ordinances and hold public hearings on mandatory park land dedication establishing neighborhood parks in our city. Staff has also surveyed other municipalities concerning successful grant applications for parks and recreation facilities from sources such as the Texas Parks and Wildlife Land and Water Conservation Fund. The common denominator fundamental to the success of the communities awarded grants despite increasingly higher standards and more intense competition for the diminishing funds was the existence of a current comprehensive master plall for parks, recreation and open spaces specific to their communities. Also, it is essential to have a current comprehensive master plan in place for a mandatory park land dedication ordinance to be effective and equitable in its application, as well as defendable in court. The Parks and Recreation Board and Beautification Commission have unanimously endorsed the Parks and Recreation Department's request for a Comprehensive Master Plan and have requested staff to contact interested firms and request preliminary proposals be submitted for budget purposes and presentation to Council. Six (6) firms have responded with proposals and budget estimates rangil1g from $35,000 to $75,000 depending upon the final determination of the scope of services tIle City would l-eqllest. staff estimates a budget figure of $50,000 would meet the cost of services appropriate to our City. These costs could be reduced based on the degree of staff participation and use of existing aerial photographs, base maps, land use maps, thoroughfare and zoning maps, surveys, demographic data and information included in the outdated 1982 Master Plan. Staff is ready and willing to provide 100% of the support and tin\e necessary to reduce costs with our full and active pal-ticilJatiû11 i11 tIle pla111ling process. T11e Pal-ks 'a11d ReCl-eatio11 Master Plan should be considered as an essential planning tool necessary to insure that a progressive and aesthetically pleasing park, recreation and open space system is provided for the citizens of North Richland Hills. Our natural resources are limited and planning is essential now to provide balanced development of our city which guarantees t]1e high quality of life desirable to our residents and potential commercial, industrial and economic growth. FUNDlt~G SOURCE: The City Council approved the inclusion of a Parks and Library Donatio11 amount on the utility bills since the late 1970's. Each year tIle Parks aIld Libl"ary Departments silbmi t a budget for tIle llse of the estimated revenue from that source. If there were savings from each Department, the amounts are accumulated separately. The Park's fU11d balance from donations is approximately $60,000 as of September 30, 1989. TIle Pl-oposed pal-}~s Inaster plan lnay be funded as follows: FRO},.;I: U11appl-c)priated Stlrplt.ls - Pal'ks #07-00-00-1000 $50,000 TO: Special Services - Parks #07-01-00-4800 CIT'( OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS $50,000 I- I I I I I I I I It I I I I I I I r I RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that Council authorize staff to send a request for proposals to qualified firms for parks, recreation and open space master planning services. These proposals and formal presentations will be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board and staff for the recommendation of a firm ·to city Council for your consideration. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I' ø I, I) I, I) 11 I) ~ ~~ì ~ ~ ~ I EXISTING PARKS, RECREATION AREAS AND OPEN SPACES CUL TURAL, ENVIRONMENT AL AND HISTORICAL INFOAMA TlON DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMA TION, PAST STUDIES AND ORDINANCES PUBLIC MEETINGS SURVEYS I I I " STEp· 1 INVENTORY REVIEW STEP 2 HE EM ASSESSMENT I REVIEW STEP 3 ANAL YSI S MVIEW CONTlHUOUS EV ALUA TIOH PROCESS STEP 5 FINAL RECOUMEND- ATIOHS ·r AEVIE,W '" . ~ STEP 4 PRELIMINARY RECOM~AEND- ATlONS METHODO-'OGY I ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT I Ie I I City of j\(9rth Richland !-JiUs, Te.xas ,. .~. ·t ,~\ I : I a y 2 l. J 1 9 8 9 I TO l'[ayor Tommy Bro~vn, Nembers of the North Richland Hills C:i. ty GaUlle il éllld Rodger N. Line, Ci ty ~lanager I fROÌ'l: David ~lcGí.lvary, Chairman and ~lembers of the North I~ichland Hills P81:ks Dud Rec~"eation Board I RE Comprellc:nsi.ve Pal~ks, Recreation and Open Space Has tel' Plan .'" . I The Parks :-Jnd F~ecrc'a tion ßO:Jl'd has been charged' to sel~~r~," in an ndvisol~Y capacity to the COLÙ!cil élnd City Staff concerning the ac:'quisition, cleve loplll(~n t I main t e'nance and us e of parks, playgrounds ',::~and open s paces in the City. It is the duty of the B0é11'd to make cOlltinuotls. study uf the Ij(~cd:3 of the, City for the establisbment of public parks~ncl recrc8.tion facilíl.ies, to investigate and recommend the locations or sites at h1hich public parks and recrcation facilities 'should be made available h':Llhin the municipal limits, suggest means of aC9uíring Hud developi,ng such f;Jcilities and [ucnish the ~ity Council. and City Hanag~:r. \v~_th overall plans [0\ cleve lopnlcll t élud lmprovemen t of all sllch. fac 111 tles and to repor t to Lb.e C i Ly Coune il :.:lnd Ci ty rlarlélgc r the resul ts ,', of its studies recommcnda t 10ns and plans. ' þ I I h1 i t 11 lb. e s C 1" e S po n sib i 1 i tic sin mind, t li e Par k s and It e c rea t í 0 II ß 0 a 1: d l' C S I )(~ c L [ u 11 y sub In í t sou r en t h us i [l S tic sup po r t for the Par k san cl E e c l' C~ a t ion S ta [t I S proposal to re tain the pl:ofess ional services llccessa 1:)' to ~.¡o rk wi tlt St8[[ ~Ind the Parks and ReCl~eation Board to develop a curl~ent COlllprehensive L-1é.1S lel' Plan £01' Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces. The Parks 8.lld RecreaLiuIl Board voted u.n8nimous~y ill support of this proposal 8t the t·! é.1 Y 1, 1 9 [3 9 111 e e tin g . I I I Your cOll~;idcratioll of this siglli~icant 'need is greatly appreciaLed. I Respectfully Su.l)mitted, ÇE/t~~et~;rßf7/ ell.:) i 1Il1é\ n ¡¿: . Pa r ks ::'1 nd l\cc rea t ion Board CiLy of Uorth Richland Hills I ,. cc: P~lrk.s and lleCl"eation Boal-d tlembers J illl ßl"Oh'ne, Direc tor of Parks Dnd Recreation \ I (017} 281-0011;730t ~I.E. LOOP ß20/P.O. u~x 10G09iN?f1TJ! n'C~~L^ND HILLS, TX 7GÎ~;O " I· ~ \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Economi c Deve 1 opment Purchase of Two Utility Vehicles - Iron Horse Golf Subject: Course - Reso 1 ut i on No. 90-07 Council Meeting Date: 2/12/90 Agenda Number: PU 90-04 Recreational Services, Ltd. has visited with city staff about purchasing two additional "truckster" type vehicles for use at Iron Horse. These are utility type vehicles that have an approximate 1,500 lb. - 2,000 lb. payload and are used to do various repair and maintenance jobs around the course. Currently there are two of these vehicles on hand. The request for additional vehicles comes for several reasons: 1. The distances between work sites at Iron Horse are great. A crew working on the north side of IH-820 is not easily accessible. 2. The low water crossings, located throughout the course, require the removal of brush/trash after every rain - something which had not been anticipated. There was an initial savings on our equipment bid, over budget price, of $42,953. City Council has approved one additional piece of equipment, a chipper which has' been heavily utilized, in the amount of $4,995. The remaining balance is sufficient to finance the proposed purchase. In our first bid, Watson Distributing Co. was awarded the bid for "Cushman Trucksters" for a price of $7,947 each. Watson Distributing has agreed to honor their low bid price from the previous bid and provide the City two additional Cushman Trucksters (Model #532) for the same price - $7,947 X 2 = $15,894. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of city staff that the City Council: a) approve an alteration to the original Iron Horse Equipment List - adding two additional utility vehicles. b) authorize the purchase of two Cushman Trucksters - Model #532 - as per Watson Distributing Company's previous low bid in the amount of $15,894. Finance Review a /ì ~~ if Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM e Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other , Finance Director ,; 1/1 . e¡?J , /"-.... ¡,' . .f-- .~ City Manager I I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I RESOLUTION NO. 90-07 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The bid of Watson Distributing Company for two "Cushman Trucksters" at $7,947.00 each be accepted and approved. 2. The funds, heretofore appropriated, and herein ratified, shall be paid from Golf Course Contractual Obligation Funds. PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of February, 1990. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .partment: Budget Subject: Award of Bid for Dump Trucks to *Graff Chevrolet Council Meeting Date: 2/12/90 Agenda Number: PU 90-05 The Fiscal Year 1989-90 Utility Fund Operating Budget included funds for the replacement of two Dump Trucks. The existing trucks are 1979 models. Due to the condition of these vehicles, replacement is necessary. Formal bids were solicited and the results are noted below: Jerry's Chevrolet $61,548 Friendly Chevrolet 58,320 I Summit White GMC 57,758 *Graff Chevrolet 57,680 Recommendation: e It is recommended that City Council award the bid for two Dump Trucks to *Graff Chevrolet in the amount of $57,680. , , , , , , Source of Funds: -.ondS. (GO/Rev.) TõPerating Budget Otr",¡ / I 1 \: /iJ?- ~(J (~ ----X- Finance Review Acct. Number 02-11-01-6600 SUffICL%n>ñila~~~ (If/I ¿¡-;~ City Manager . Finance Director ~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Pace 1 of 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS liepartment: Budget Council Meeting Date: 2/12/90 ~Ubject: Award of Bid for Camera Systems to *Ikegami Electronics Agenda Number: PU 90-07 ~ The Fiscal Year 1989/90 Management Information Services Operating Budget included funds for the replacement of two cameras which are inoperable and not repairable. The systems are utilized by citicable 36 in the production of training films and community interest programming. As requested at the Budget Workshop, the purchase of used equipment was considered. However, the cost of refurbishing the used equipment far exceeds the cost of new. The search for used equipment was reviewed by the Cable Board which unanimously endorsed the purchase of new equipment. Formal bids were solicited for two Ikegami camera systems. The results are noted below: MPCS Video Industries, Inc. $25,189 MZB/Gray, Inc. 22,974 . *Ikegami Electronics (U.S.A.), Inc. 22,722 . I I I Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council award the bid for two camera systems to *Ikegami Electronics (U.S.A.), Inc. in the amount of $22,722. I Source of Funds: l Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~ e, ,OP". erating Budget íOther (~ì(~) f(~ k&29 _ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review ---1L- , Finance Director , I / '/ //1 / <' r/< ,¿,l.,,,"" ¿ --.1" / ~ . City Manager Pa e 1 of I r CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I _Department: I Subject: The City has not had overall aerial photography since 1982. Since that time significant Capital Improvement Projects and other major developments have taken place in our City. CUrrent and accurate aerial photography is essential to generate accurate maps for Planning and Zoning, Public Works, utility, Tax, Park & Recreation, and other departments. At last year's Budget Work Session, the staff was directed to continue the search for an adequate, affordable, Geographical Information System (GIS). We are continuing with that project. Regardless of what particular GIS System is recommended to the Council, aerial photographs will be required. In addition, accurate aerial photography is needed to meet major mapping standards and to allow the City to relate all it's topography to the Texas State Plane Coordinate System. I I I I I I 1,_ I I I I I I I I Ie I Public Works/Utilities Council Meeting Date: 02/12/90 Approve Budget for 1990 ~Qriål Photography for City Agenda Number: PW 90-09 It is recommended that this photography be accomplished at this time for several reasons: 1) More accurate photography is accomplished during the winter months when foliage is not present. 2) There could be possibly cost reduction due to a combination of projects with other neighboring cities which will allow the Photography Contractor to combine flights. Initial Phase Cost Alone Initial Phase Cost with Others ------------------ ------------------ $4,800.00 $4,000.00 The Cities of Keller and Watauga are going to have aerials flown by the same aerial photographer at approximately the same time. The Cities of Hurst and Euless are not yet committed but do appear very interested. The estimated total cost for the initial phase of aerial photography is $5,000.00. The next step would be to take proposals from the aerial photography contractors for processing the aerial photographs into standard digitized topographic map information on a media we specify and in a computer language we specify. This step is the most expensive and would probably cost $120,000. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ee Above REV Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~m~ wr , Finance Director } ./ · / I '1 1 -/,. I ,,:- . "'--'l (' / // /" ~ ¡, \ ./ City Manager ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page Two If Council approves this expenditure and based on the presumption that the Geographical Information System (GIS) is to be pursued, the preliminary schedule for implementation would be as shown below. 2/12/90 3/15/90 3/26/90 4/26/90 5/14/90 5/21/90 2/01/91 Council approves Step #1 Aerial Photography Aerial Photographer furnishes Step #1 aerials Council approves GIS City staff take proposals for completing Step #2 of Aerial Photography process. Council authorizes Step #2 Aerial Photographer begins Step #2 Mapping Final Step #2 product is delivered to City by Aerial Photographer Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available from 1989 Revenue Bond Unspecified and may be appropriated as follow for Step #1. FROM: 1989 Revenue Bond Unspecified 02-89-99-6700 $ 5,000.00 TO: 1990 Aerial Photography - Eng. 02-89-10-6000 1,000.00 1990 Aerial Photography - Special Serve 02-89-10-6000 4,000.00 TOTAL AMOUNT $ 5,000.00 Recommendation: The staff recommends the Council approve the subject budget and transfer of funds as indicated above. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I .epartment: I Subject: I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Public Works/Utilities Council Meeting Date: 02/12/90 Agenda Number: PW 90-12 Award of Bid for Davis Boulevard utility ~djUgtmQntð Bids were received on the subject project on February 2, 1990 and the low bidders are shown below. Bidder Amount Calendar Day Bid Time Mid-state utilities Larry H. Jackson Co. Atkins Bros. Co. $308,556.79 $357,506.40 $362,856.90 150 150 The budget for this project was approved by Council on November 13, 1989, PW 89-44, at $345,000 for construction. The project is necessitated by the proposed widening and improvement to FM 1938 (Davis Blvd.) by the Texas Department of Highways & Public Transportation. Funding Source: Sufficient funds were previously approved by city Council and the proposed contract may be expensed to Account Number 02-09-91-6000. Recommendation: The staff recommends award of the subject project to Mid-State Utilities in the amount of $308,556.79 for a period of 150 calendar days. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other I ;1 /, /~Y. See Above REV Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ <-- 7{l~ ~~ - .~ ¡IV,. /;/ /~ J,~ 1\.- ".; / City Manager . Finance Director --' Head Signat CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Pa e 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I !I Ie I KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas .. February 3, 1990 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-337, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DAVIS BLVD. UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS BID TABULATION Bids were received on February 2, 1990, for the referenced project. This project includes construction of water and sanitary sewer line relocations along Davis Blvd. from Emerald Hills Yay to Rumfield Road as required to clear the right-of-way for future paving and drainage improvements by the Highway Department. Bids were received from a total of six (6) contractors as tabulated below. Contractor Amount Bid 1 . Mid-State Utilities $ 308,556.79 2. Larry H. Jackson Co. 357,506.40 3. Atkins Bros. Co. 362,856.90 4. Circle ' C' Cons t . Co. 365,685.50 5. Utility Contr. America 390,225.44 6. Bil-Mik, Inc. 516,175.50 Days Bid 150 150 150 195 280 The low bidder, Mid-State Utilities, was the contractor for the Cardinal Lane Yater Improvements project which was completed in May, 1986. They are familiar with the area and the City of North Richland Hills' requirements. Mid-State's bid of 5308,556.79 is 536,443.21 under the construction budget of $345,000 approved by Council Action on November 13, 1989, (See item no. PY 89-44, and Account No. 02-09-91-6000). Ye would recommend award to Mid-State in the amount of $308,556.79 for a period of 150 Calendar Days. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I February 3, 1990 DAVIS BLVD. UTIL. ADJUST. Page 2 We will be present at the February 12, 1990, Council meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. ~ClA-ð w. ~ RICHARD V. ALBIN, P.E. RVA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manager Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Utilities Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. John Moody, Yater and Sewer Superintendent I I Department: I -SUbject: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works Council Meeting Date: 02/12/90 Approve Final Pay Estimate #2 in the ~~ount of $26,2~O.10 to Tri-TQch Construction, Inc. - Wilman Avenue Drainage Improvements Agenda Number: PAY 90-03 This ClP project was awarded by the Council November 27, 1989 for $73,887.50 to Tri-Tech Construction. No change orders were approved on this project. Final payment to the contractor will rnake his total earnings on the project $71,598.50. The Contractor substantially completed this project on January 31, 1990. The project is now totally complete with all final adjustments having been made. Funding Source: Sufficient funds were appropriated for the project and the summary of cost are detailed below. Budget Difference Transferred to Unspecified Actual Drainage Const. $104,000.00 $32,401.50 $71,598.50 Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of final payment to Tri-Tech Construction, Inc. in the amount of $26,260.10 and the transfer of the balance to the appropriate Unspecified Account as detailed above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other 13-31-8/-6000 GO Acct. Number SUffic~ailable 17/L~ I t1 J ..' /¡ ,: 't1 / </¡J t...r' / J (. !/ //1 .,- // \............,i' . ,"':.. - ct(y Manager . Finance Director - - --/ - ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas February 5, 1990 Honorable Mayor and City Council Director of Public Yorks City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 . ...................-----~~.--_..#-_. ..-.... Re: 3-359, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, YILMAN AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIM. NO. 2 & FINAL Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 2 & Final, dated February 5, 1990, made payable to Tri-Tech Construction, Inc. in the amount of $26,260.10, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of January 31, 1990. This project included storm drain construction from Yilman Avenue to the North Hills Mall parking lot as required to drain a low area on Yilman Avenue. Inlets along the storm drain were also provided to help alleviate flooding in the vicinity of the Richland Hills Methodist Church parking lot. Ye would note that the project was not designed to handle all the flooding problems on Yilman Avenue, but rather to drain only a portion of that street. The quantities and conditions of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Mr. S. L. Zuckman, as indicated by his signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We understand that City Forces have monitored trench densities, and in the absence of any negative reports we would recommend that this final payment, in amount of $26,260.10, be made to Tri-Tech Construction, Inc., 1133 E. Loop 820 So., Fort Yorth, Texas 76112. Contractor earnings for this project totaled $71,598.50, which is $2,289.00 under the contract amount of $73,887.50. The original contract amount is based on estimated quantities of construction, and the final contractor earnings is based on actual as-built quantities. The contract completion date was February 9, 1990, and the project was completed before this date. Therefore, liquidated damages were not incurred nor should they be assessed on this project. The two (2) year term of maintenance begins on this date, and therefore, Continued ... 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I February 5, 1990 YILMAN AVENUE FINAL Page 2 will terminate on February 5, 1992. The maintenance obligation includes repair of all storm drain breaks or stoppage. The maintenance obligation also includes sealing of pavement cracks, repair of pavement buckling or other failures resulting from storm drain backfill settlement or other subgrade failure, along with failure of all concrete flatwork and other concrete structures such as inlets and vaults. An Affidavit from the contractor is required before final payment is made which states that all his suppliers and subcontractors have been paid and that there are no outstanding claims against the contractor related to this project. Ye will be present at the February 12, 1990, Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. w.~ RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E. RYA/bvg/f3359l19 Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manager Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. John Johnston, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks Mr. S.L. Zuckman, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Tri-Tech Construction, Inc. I I Estimate No. .e No. F3359.Y20 I ject Description: Contractor: Tri-Tech Construction, Inc. I Owner: City of North Richland Hills Place: North Richland Hills, Texas I CONCRETE STORH DRAIN PIPE: 1. 33"Dia.(ASTH C-76 CI.III)RCP L.F. 2. 24"Dia.(ASTM C-76 Cl.III)RCP L.F. I II HISCELLANEOUS IHPROVEHENTS : 3. I 4. 5. 6. 7. I.: 10. I 11. 12. 13. I 14. 15. 16. II 1 I I I Ie I I ~~: CON T R ACT 0 R ' S EST I HAT E Page I of 2 - . . - . . - - . - . - - . 2 & Final Job No. 3-359 Date: Cal. Days: V.O. Date: Scheduled Completion Date: For Materials Furnished and Labor Performed in Period Ending: Time Charged Thru Period (Days): 5·FEB·1990 6C 11 . DEC· 1989 9·FEB·1990 VILMAN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS 31·JAN·1990 51 PREVIOUS THIS UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT -----.----.....-.----.-.-.... ..--...... ......... --.-...... ...-.----.. ........... 1,460.00 29.00 0.00 1,460.00 0.00 29.00 530.00 543,800.00 24.00 696.00 TOTAL CONCRETE PIPE 544,496.00 Remove Ex. Asphalt Flatwork S.F. 0.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 $0.50 $562.50 Remove Ex. Concrete Flatwork S.F. 2,475.00 0.00 2,475.00 0.10 247.50 Remove Ex. Curb & Gutter L.F. 53.00 0.00 53.00 1.00 53.00 Sawcut of Ex. Asph. or Cone. L.F. 339.00 0.00 339.00 0.50 169.50 10'Std.Cast·In·Plaee Cb Inlet EACH 0.00 2.00 2.00 2,200.00 4,400.00 Std.Cast·In·Place Drop Inlet EACH 0.00 3.00 3.00 2,000.00 6,000.00 Cone. Pavement Replacement S.F. 0.00 2,480.00 2,480.00 3.00 7,440.00 Asphalt Pavement Replacement S.F. 0.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2.00 2,250.00 Rmv & Repl. Ex.Chn Link Fence L.F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 6"Curb & 18" Gutter(6"Thk G.) L.F. 0.00 28.50 28.50 20.00 570.00 Connect to Ex.Cone.Drop Inlet L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 700.00 700.00 Relocate Ex. 6" Vater Line L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 Trench Safety Systems L.F. 1,470.00 0.00 1,470.00 1.00 1,470.00 Misc.Water Plumbing Allowance L.S. 0.87 0.00 0.87 2,000.00 1,740.00 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS DRAINAGE $27,102.50 Contractor: Tri-Tech Construction, Inc. I Owner: City of North Richland Hills Place: North Richland Hills, Texas PREVIOUS THIS UNIT II NO. .....~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~........ UNIT ..~~~~~~~~ .~~~~~~~~ ..~~~~~... ...~~~~~... ..~~~~... II II ...................................................................................... ......... Field Verification of Job Conditions II and Confirmation of Pay Quantities By: I Date: ,19_ Date::l. - S' ,19 90 Ie···································.·.............................................. ......... I I I II .. I Estimate No. .e No. F3359.V20 II ject Description: CON T R ACT 0 R ' S EST I MAT E . - . . . - . . . 2 & Final Job No. 3-359 Date: Cal. Days: V.O. Date: Scheduled Completion Date: For Materials Furnished and Labor Performed in Period Ending: Time Charged Thru Period (Days): VILHAN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Page 2 of 2 5-FEB-1990 60 11·DEC-1989 9-FEB-1990 31-JAN-1990 51 Approved: Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. Consulting Engineers By: ~ W, C2u-:.- (Project Manager) ~ eE D!<A F T COf''t (Owner's Project Representative) THIS MONTH'S BILLING: To tal . . . . . . . . . . . . Drain. Vater $26,260.10 0.00 Less Percent (%) Retained . . Difference . . . . . . . . . . Plus (%) Materials on Hand To tal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAL: $26,260.10 Less Previous Payments Difference Due This Estimate (Note: Pay Last Amount Shown) 0% $71,598.50 0.00 71,598.50 0.00 71,598.50 45,338.40 $26,260.10 75% $71,598.50 Bid: 51 Time: - . - - - -.... -..- ..-...-.-......-.. ................. -............-.......- .... ..........-.......-.. ---------------- ----------- II Total Earnings (Incl. Retain.): Time Charged Thru This Period: $73,887.50 60 Percen t : Percen t : I I II Ie I 96.90 85.00 I I I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works/utilities Council Meeting Date: 02/12/90 Agenda Number: PAY 90-04 Subject: Approve Final Pay Estimate #7 in the Amount of $37, 909. 84 to Bil P!i]r, Inc. Pfioacll.:lncoufJ Water & Sewer Improvements 1988 This CIP project was awarded by the Council April 24, 1989 for $299,627.85 to Bil-Mik, Inc. The total contract amount after change orders was $319,249.95. Final payment to the contractor will make his total earnings on the project $266,156.05. A short description of the reasons for the Contractor collecting $53,093.90 less than the full contract amount are listed on the attached engineer's recommendation letter. The Contractor substantially completed this project on December 29, 1989. The contract completion date was December 12, 1989. We have reviewed the Contractor's request for extension of time and recommend the extension of time be approved. The project is now totally complete with all final adjustments having been made. Funding Source: Sufficient funds were appropriated for the project and the summary of cost are detailed below. Budget Difference Transferred to Unspecified Actual Water Construction Sewer Construction Totals $400,000 114,021 $510,000 $172,268.75 93,887.30 $266,156.05 $227,731.25 20,133.70 $247,864.95 Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of final payment to Bil-Mik, Inc. in the amount of $37,909.84 and the transfer of the balance to the appropriate Unspecified Account as detailed above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operatin Budge Othe 02-01-32-6000 REV Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ ~~.-Ì) ,~ IJf I~ l~ /1~//~ OJ City Manager , Finance Director ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Pa e 1 of I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas January 23, 1990 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-561, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, MISCELLANEOUS YATER & SEYER IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 7 & FINAL Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 7 & Final, dated January 18, 1990, made payable to Bil-Mik, Inc., in the amount of $37,909.84, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of January 5, 1990. The quantities and conditions of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Mr. Bill Rutledge, as indicated by his signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. This project includes the following water and sewer improvements: 1. Kirk Lane 8-Inch Yater Line from Kirk Ln. to Precinct Rd. 2. Crane Road 12-Inch V.L. from Martin Dr. to Amundson Dr. 3. Holder Estates S.S. Line from Northfield Park to Davis Blvd. 4. Cummings/Daley 6-Inch San. Sewer Line 5. Vance/Cummings 6-Inch San. Sewer Line 6. Manor Avenue 6-Inch San. Sewer Line Change orders were added as described below: 1. Extend Holder Estates S.S. to serve two more lots. 2. Extend Vance/Cummings S.S. to serve two more lots. The original contract amount was $299,627.85. Change orders were added which increased the contract amount to $319,249.95. Final contractor earnings total $266,156.05 which is $53,093.90 under the contract amount. Please see the attached project status report which accounts for the differences in original estimated and final as-built quantities. The following is a discussion of the primary reasons for the cost savings: 1. A portion of the proposed Cummings/Daley S.S. was deleted 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I 1_ I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I January 23, 1990 MISC. VATER AND SEVER IMPROVEMENTS Page 2 when an existing previously unknown line was uncovered which could be used without requiring replacement. 2. A new 12-inch water main was constructed in Crane from Martin to Amundson. An allowance for replacement, if needed, of an existing 12-inch pipe segment in Crane was provided in the contract. The existing 12-inch line did not require replacement, therefore this allowance was not used. 3. An allowance for fence replacement, if needed, was provided on the Vance/Cummings/Daley S.S. project. Many of the fences did not require replacement, so this resulted in a cost savings. 4. The contract provided for either borings or open cuts for the water and sewer lines. The contract was awarded based on the more expensive alternate. The less expensive alternate was actually built. s. A miscellaneous plumbing allowance of $12,000 was provided in the contract for replacement of sprinkler systems, etc., if required. This allowance was not needed and therefore not used. The contract completion time was December 12, 1989. The substantial completion date was December 29, 1989. Attached is a letter from the contractor dated November 30, 1989, in which he requests an extension in time due to delays beyond his control. The project inspector recommends approval of the requested time extension and we have no objection. Therefore, liquidated damages were not incurred nor should they be assessed on this project. The two (2) year term of maintenance begins on this date, and therefore, will terminate on January 23, 1992. The maintenance obligation includes repair of all water line leaks and malfunctions of all valves, fire hydrants, and other equipment furnished and installed under this contract along with all sanitary sewer line breaks or stoppage. The maintenance obligation also includes sealing of pavement cracks, repair of pavement buckling or other failures resulting from water line, or sewer line backfill settlement or other subgrade failure, along with failure of all concrete flatwork and other concrete structures such as manhole vaults. An Affidavit from the contractor is required before final payment is made which states that all his suppliers and subcontractors have been paid and I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I January 23, 1990 MISC. YATER AND SEYER IMPROVEMENTS Page 3 that there are no outstanding claims against the contractor related to this project. Ye understand that City forces have monitored trench densities, and in the absence of any negative reports we recommend that this final payment, in amount of $37,909.84, be made to Bil-Mik, Inc., 11885 Alta Vista, Keller, Texas 76248. Ye will be present at the February 12, 1990, Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. ~Wr ~. RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E. RYA/bvg/f3561l19 Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manager Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Utilities Mr. Larry Jones, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Bil-Mik, Inc. I CON T R ACT 0 R ' S EST I HAT E 7 & Final . - - - -.. . . . - - -. -. I Estimate No. ~e No. F3561.V20 ~ject Description: I Contractor: Bil-Mik, Inc. I Owner: City of North Richland Place: North Richland Hills I ~~: Job No. 3-561 Date: Cal. Days: MISCELLANEOUS WATER AND SEVER IMPROVEMENTS \1.0. Date: Scheduled Completion Date: For Materials Furnished and Labor Performed in Period Ending: Time Charged Thru Period (Days): Hills ITEM DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS THIS UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE -- ........ .........--. -----.- WATER IMPROVEMENTS : I I 1 IV. 2V. 3V. 4V. 6\1. 7W. 8V. 9V. 10V. 111W. 12V. 13\1. 114V · . 11 7V · 18'1. 19'1. 20'1. 123V · 24\1. 25'1. r6V. 12" Dia. PVC Vater Pipe L.F. 8" Dia. PVC Vater Pipe L.F. 8" Ductile Iron Pipe L.F. 6" Dia. PVC Vater Pipe L.F. 2"Dia. Sch. 40 PVC Vater Pipe L.F. Concrete Encasement L.F. Ductile Iron Fittings TON 12"xI2" Tap Slv & 12"GV v/Box EACH 4"x4" Tap Slv & 4" GV wlBox EACH 12" Gate Valve & Valve Box EACH 8" Gate Valve & Valve Box EACH 6" Gate Valve & Valve Box EACH 2" Gate Valve & Valve Box EACH Fire Hydrant EACH Short Single Vtr Line Trans. EACH Long Single Vtr Line Trans. EACH Short Double Vtr Line Trans. EACH Sawcut Conc.&Asph.(Vat.Main) L.F. Asph. Pvmnt for Vater Main L.F. Vtr Line Trench Safety System L.S. Bore & Pres. Grout Vtr Lines L.F. Bore & Pres. Grout Vtr Main L.F. Misc. Plumbing Allowance L.S. -.......- 3,165.00 3,384.00 149.00 28.00 0.00 140.00 5.76 1.00 0.00 1.00 5.00 10.00 0.00 9.00 14.00 30.00 0.00 110.00 55.00 1.00 184.00 323.00 0.00 TOTAL AMOUNT VATER IMPROVEMENTS IFANITARY SEVER IMPROVEMENTS 15. 8" Dia. Sanitary Sewer PVC L.F. 12S* 6" Dia. Sanitary Sewer PVC L.F. 35* 4" Dia. Sanitary Sewer Vye EACH 4S. 4" D1a. Sanitary Sewer Trans. EACH 15S* UncI. Trench Exc (0'-6') L.F. 65* UncI. Trench Exc (6'-8') L.F. 75* UncI. Trench Exc (8'-10') L.F. 85* UncI. Trench Exc (10'-12') L.F. 195* UncI. Trench Exc (12'-14') L.F. OS. UncI. Trench Exc (14' & Above)L.F. l~ 4'Dia. Spcl Precast MH w/Base EACH I I 1,168.00 2,018.00 36.00 0.00 122.00 1,550.00 466.00 109.00 616.00 225.00 4.00 ----.-.-. 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.00 87.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,133.00 655.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 SUBTOTAL AMOUNT SANITARY SEVER IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL ...----.. 3,165.00 3,384.00 149.00 46.00 87.00 140.00 5.76 1.00 0.00 1.00 5.00 10.00 3.00 9.00 14.00 30.00 0.00 1,243.00 710.00 1.00 184.00 323.00 0.00 1,168.00 2,078.00 36.00 0.00 182.00 1,550.00 466.00 109.00 616.00 225.00 5.00 UNIT PRICE -.--.-....- $19.00 12.00 26.20 10.60 6.75 7.00 1,950.00 1,850.00 730.00 745.00 402.00 280.00 170.00 950.00 180.00 270.00 180.00 1.70 12.00 2,000.00 18.00 35.00 10,000.00 $2.60 1.50 45.00 75.00 8.90 11 . 00 13.30 15.80 19.00 23.00 735.00 Page 1 of 2 18-JAN-1990 190 5-JUN-1989 12-DEC-1989 5-JAN-1990 214 AMOUNT ..---.-.--- $60,135.00 40,608.00 3,903.80 487.60 587.25 980.00 11,232.00 1,850.00 0.00 745.00 2,010.00 2,800.00 510.00 8,550.00 2,520.00 8 , 1 00 . 00 0.00 2,113.10 8,520.00 2,000.00 3,312.00 11,305.00 0.00 $172,268.75 $3,036.80 3,117.00 1,620.00 0.00 1,619.80 17,050.00 6,197.80 1,722.20 11,704.00 5,175.00 3,675.00 $54,917.60 I CON T R ACT 0 R ' S EST I HAT E ... - - -. - -.. Page 2 of 2 . . . . . IIEstimate No. 7 & Final Job No. 3·561 Date: F~ No. F3561.V20 Cal. Days: I~ect Description: MISCELLANEOUS VATER AND SEVER IMPROVEMENTS V.O. Date: Scheduled Completion Date: For Materials Furnished and Labor Contractor: Bil·Mik, Inc. Performed in Period Ending: lowner: City of North Richland Hills Time Charged Thru Period (Days): Place: North Richland Hills 18-JAN-1990 190 5-JUN-1989 12-DEC-1989 5-JAN-1990 214 PREVIOUS THIS UNIT r~: ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT .. ...... -.. -.-.. -.-...- .-.-.- --.--.... --....--. ...---... ........... ..........- SUBTOTAL FORVARDED SEVER IMPROVEMENTS $54,917.60 12S* Type "A" Cast· in· Place SSMH EACH 9.00 0.00 9.00 $800.00 $7,200.00 3S* Addt'l Depth of Manhole L.F. 35.00 0.00 35.00 62.00 2,170.00 14S. Asph.Pvrnnt Repl.for 5.S. Main L.F. 328.00 0.00 328.00 12.00 3,936.00 116S* Rem/Stbk/Rec/Repl Ex. Fence L.F. 745.00 0.00 745.00 8.00 5,960.00 75. Sawcut Conc.&Asph.for SS Main L.F. 697.00 0.00 697.00 1.70 1,184.90 185. SS Serv.Line Asph.Pvmnt Repl. L.F. 168.00 0.00 168.00 12.00 2,016.00 119S. Misc. S.S. Plumbing Allowance L.S. 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 OS. S.S. Trench Safety Systems L.S. 0.98 0.02 1.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 IS* Bore & Pres. Grout 5S Lines L.F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 112S* Bore & Pres. Grout SS Main L.F. 98.50 0.00 98.50 48.00 4,728.00 3S. Cast-in-Place Drop Manhole EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 980.00 0.00 45* 4" Dia. S.S. PVC Pipe L.F. 601 . 00 10.00 611.00 7.60 4,643.60 25S* 4"Dia. SS Connection-Deep Cut EACH 0.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 16S* Top Soil (4" Deep) S.Y. 1,272.00 0.00 1,272.00 1.60 2,035.20 .. Solid Sodding S.Y. 882.00 0.00 882.00 3.00 2,646.00 28 . Connect 55 Pipe to HH EACH 3.00 0.00 3.00 150.00 450.00 II................:~:~~.~~~~.~~~:~~.~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~.~........................~:~~~~~:~~ . Field Verification of Job Conditions IInd Confirmation of Pay Quantities Approved: Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. Con Iting Engineers U/. atLc.-:.- t: 5e£ D1?AFT COPY (Owner's Project Representative) (Project Manager) r ~ ~ ~ · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · . ~ ~ : ~ · · · · . · . · · · . · . · · · · · · · · ~~ ~ ~ ~ · . · · . · · · ~. ~ · .~. ~. · · · · · · · ~ ~ : . ~ ~ THIS MONTH'S BILLING: Total · · . . . . . . . . $266,156.05 II Less Percent (%) Retained · · 0% 0.00 Vater: $ 33,454.00 Difference · . . . . . . . . 266,156.05 Sewer: 4,455.84 Plus (%) Materials on Hand 100% 0.00 II Total · · · · · · · · · · · 266,156.05 TOTAL: $ 37,909.84 Less Previous Payments 228,246.21 Difference Due This Estimate $37,909.84 1l~~i'~~;~¡~~~'(~~~i:'~~~~¡~:);""""i66:i~::~~~"::~;~~~~9~;~;;:ã;~~~~~~;~~~~;'~~~~~~::::; Ti1llfharged Thru This Period: 214 Time: 190 Percent: 112.63 I By: I