Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC 1990-06-11 Agendas
.. ~ I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA June 11, 1990 - 6:00 P.M. I For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, I 7301 Northeast Loop 820. I NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN I 1. North Tarrant Freeway - Mayor Pro Tern Davis (5 Minutes) I 2. Golf Course Repair and GN 90-86 Iron Horse Golf Course - Proposed Policy Changes (Agenda Item No. 12) (30 Minutes) I I I 3. IR 90-57 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Collection (15 Minutes) I 4. PW 90-25 Approve Budget For Holiday Lane Loop 820 north to Noreast Drive (Agenda Item No. 22) (15 Minutes) I I 5. Possible Work Session - Master Thoroughfare Plan I 6. Other Items (5 Minutes) I 7. *Executive Session (10 Minutes) a. Personnel b. Briefing on Pending litigation c. Review of Progress on land Acquisition I ~ 1 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 11, 1990 For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting May 14, 1990 5. Presentations of Proclamations 6. Presentations by Boards & Commissions None 7. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 8. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23) * 9. GN 90-83 Adoption of Resolution Confirming Cooperation and Participation in Tarrant County's Community Development Block Grant Program, 1991-1993 - Resolution No. 90-30 *10. GN 90-84 Approval of Geographical Information System (GIS) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 11. GN 90-85 Enforcement of Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance No. 1471, Resolution No. 90-21 *12. GN 90-86 Iron Horse Golf Course - Proposed Policy Changes *13. GN 90-87 Property Tax Refund 14. GN 90-88 Adoption of Water and Wastewater Impact Fees - Ordinance No. 1679 *15. GN 90-89 Funding for Resprigging of Bermuda Grass; Iron Horse Golf Course *16. PU 90-23 Award of Bid for Bunker clothes - Fire Department *17. PU 90-24 Equipment Purchases; Iron Horse Golf Course - Resolution No. 90-31 *18. PU 90-25 Award of Pothole Patcher Bid to RGS Industries *19. PU 90-26 Award of Bid for the Purchase of Utility Bill Statements and Envelopes to Frontier Printing *20. PU 90-27 Award of Fork lift Bid to Omni Equipment I- , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *21. PU 90-28 Approval of Purchase of an additional Tanker Truck and Award of Bid for the One Ton Pick-up to Bruce Lowrie and the Fire Fighting Unit Bid to Casco *22. PW 90-25 Approve Budget for Holiday Lane Loop 820 north to Noreast Drive *23. PAY 90-09 Approve Final Pay Estimate No.4 in the Amount of $23,141.58 to Wright Construction Company for Bogart/Deaver Drive Drainage Improvements 24. Citizens Presentation 25. Adjournment POSTED p-r; ·C)O Date j,' L/þ (J,(YL ·r· rr, ') I hd~ City Secretary By (7? 11 fA.;é.j/J'f'- I, I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL NO.IR 90-58 Date: June 7, 1990 Subject: CARSTON COURT ADDITION, Drainage Problems Affecting Homeowners on Lariat Trail The following information is submitted in response to a petition submitted to the Council by residents on Lariat Trail. The Council approved the final plat for Carston Court Addition on June 23, 1986. The approval was subject to certain drainage improvements being installed. These improvements were not installed, but the rest of the construction was completed. Building permits were issued in the addition though total acceptance of the subdivision was never issued by the Public Works Department. The developer's designated representative, City Manager, Director of Public Works, and City Engineer met on May 29, 1988. An agreement with reference to further required drainage improvements for Carston Court was formulated and subsequently signed by all parties. A copy of the signed agreement is attached. The improvements as outlined in the agreement have never been installed. Several of the property owner's which front on Lariat Trail and back up to Carston Court Addition have apparently been impacted by the developer not installing these improvements. (see attached letter dated May 30, 1990). The current owner of the remalnlng vacant lots in the Cars ton Court Addition is Western National Bank, 8851 Highway 80 West, Fort Worth, Texas 76116. staff intends to contact the bank as soon as possible and determine their intentions concerning the agreement dated June 3, 1988. Until resolution of this problem, no building permits are being issued in this addition. We will report back to Council as soon as we have further information. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of JX8rth Richland Hills, Texas June 3, 1988 REF: PWL-0057-88 Mr. George Tucker 3905 Diamond Lock East North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: CARSTON COURT ADDITION; Drainage Improvements George, Pursuant to our meeting with you as the Carston Court owners' representative on May 29, 1988, we are recommending drainage improvements on Lots 10, 11, and 12, of Block 1 in accordance with construction plans prepared by Delbert Stembridge and submitted on April 19, 1988. These plans include a concrete drainage flume located in an existing 10-foot drainage easement along the west line of said Lots 10, 11, and 12°. Also included in this recommendation is an extension of this proposed concrete flume along the south line of Lot 10 as required to pick up concentrated flow at the southwest corner of Lot 10. Permanent drainage facilities along the south line of Lots 8 and 9 or any other lots in the Carston Court Addition will not be required provided all lots are graded properly to cause the runoff to drain to the street or to sheet flow from one lot onto the adjacent lot without creating a concentration of flow and without causing ponding. Block sodding of the back yard areas will be necessary on the lots where concentration of flow cannot be avoided in order to control erosion. In addition, the top of the proposed flume curbs along the west line of Lots 10, 11, and 12 should be located below the natural ground line of adjacent lots to the west which front on Lariat Trail thereby allowing these Lariat Trail lots to freely drain to the proposed concrete flume. If you are in agreement with this recommendation, please signify by signing this letter and returning it to the Director of Public Works. ßcdJ~ 11/~?~ Rodger N. ine City Manager ~ûJ,~ Richard W. Albin, P.E. Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. cker Representative (817) 281.0041"301 N.E. LOOP 8201P.0. BOX 18809/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 78180 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of J(örth Richland Hills, Texas . June 13, 1988 REF: PWL-0070-88 Mr. George Tucker 3905 Diamond Loch East North Richland Hills, TX 76180 RE: CARSTON COURT ADDITION; Drainage Improvements; "AMENDMENT TO JUNE 3, 1988 AGREEMENT" The agreement dated June 3,1988 on' the City's letterhead is amended to include the following statement. "The owner of the remaining Carston Court Addition lots which have not been sold to builders or individuals will add a stipulation on all future contracts-of-sa1e documents which will clearly state the City of North Richland Hills will not issue any further building permits until the drainage improvements as agreed to have been completed." y GWD/ds (817) 281-0041"301 N.E. LOOP 8201P.0. BOX 18808/NOATH AICHLAND HILLS, TX 78180 I, 1, e I I I I 180 I I Ie I I KAREN I NA I Ie I PRESE1T ZONING R- 1 MEADOWIRIDGE ESTATES Vol. ~..-,.. Po. . e, I I . .' : ... ~ ¡. ; ~5 : r.: . ..- : :;- N90 OO'OOME 704.04 -- - 95.67 -__ ----14646______,__ 95.67 -__ 5' UTILITY ESM'T J ! B L 0 C d' h~ ~~g 14 ~I,~ _I L'b:.I..'B - ------- K :x 00 15 0.0 ~g ....0 ~.D-- ~ 16 ~INE~~/ = 95.67 49.00 \...-~ 95.67 N90'OO'OOME 289.74 COURT ~ õ: I - lo.aJ , : ~1.. .:~.~ fI) ac ::! CD ~ . I!:J 4"ßf7,ð 0 Q: . c;., 1'". ~ I'-'-f ! to- : : --- ~.~ ~ :--,. -- ----~ g £:I.. 53""!i:41 I~ MP ~::! :: au :: ;~. :_~ .. .~: 2 ~ -'t..1"l>' -._'.,..'~_...... ~:~ '"I. P, ~._.. ~ ,.... - - ~ " 103.00 105.30 Q) ® \ -;tï:.\Z BLDG.-,- :"INE'/- - i ~ '\'J i I.obLI.o S; ~ ~ \ ~ 7 II 6 cri;' r ~ c5 ;. 9 -0 ¡ .-J " ~,~ t;¡i" N 1-- -..t'\~ I S6;~5.99 . \ \Õ.~~ ~ ' ~oo ~ ~o '~<' ~ rt t~ fòO'l,'ð I 'I.. ~ b~ c;;; I C ~o <o~o I 45C rm ~', JJ¡z ~ ~<) i II J 2' ~;~.. 1>M vP ~ I ¡\ ¿>,~ 8 >-QI 5 2Z:f ~.-' 5 2:r ~;r] ~ - 0 /~ :J ¡ ~ -2 , I /'--49.68-- 7.28 - - _1. ~184./ Y S 45015'55"WY '\ 21.~1 I ~', c.: " . ,,- . ~1.~_ (. , C~----: N99' N 44044'0~'' 21. 21 / / ::: :.\ . '. .. . PARKRIDGE ESTr TES Vol. 388- U' 1 PII. 38 PRESENT ZONING "-1 ,/ PI=IDPERTV LINE CURVE DATA CURVE <D CURVE ® ~:1I2°le'02'1 A 2134°12'58'. FINAL Pll ·" ) I· ;/ - . ':";- ~ :' .'~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MAY 30, 1990 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL 7301 NE LOOP 820 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS RE: PROPERTY BOUNDERED ON THE EAST SIDE (REAR) OF HOMES AT 4808, 4812, 4816, AND 4820 LARIAT TRAIL, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. DEAR COUNCIL MEMBERS: WE AS HOMEOWNERS IN THE REFERENCED AREA WISH TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION, AND RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR ASSISTANCE, IN OBTAINING RELIEF FROM THE SERIOUS PROBLEMS THAT HAVE ARISEN FROM LACK OF MAINTENANCE AND IMPROPER GRADING OF THE AREA BEHIND OUR HOMES. OVER THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS, AS THE CARSTON COURT SITE WAS UNDER DEVELOPMENT, THERE WERE MANY ATTEMPTS MADE TO PER- SUADE THE UTILITY COMPANIES, CABLE COMPANY, AND DEVELOPERS OF THIS PROPERTY TO CORRECT THESE NUISANCES WHICH HAVE BEEN CREATED, BUT TO NO AVAIL. WE HAVE, FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS, LIVED WITH EXTREMELY POOR DRAINAGE, WATER THAT BACKS UP TO THE FOUNDATION OF THE HOME IN SOME INSTANCES, SNAKES AND INSECTS THAT ACCUMULATE FROM THE STAGNATION OF WATER, THE DESTRUCTION OF PLANTS, SHRUBS, AND LAWN GRASSES, AND DAMAGE TO EXISTING RETAINING WALLS AND FENCES. IN SOME CASES IMPROPER GRADING AND SOIL BEING FORCED AGAINST OUR BACK YARD FENCES HAVE PUSHED THEM TO THE GROUND. WE HAVE ALL SPENT UNNECESSARY MONIES FOR NEEDLESS DAMAGES THAT COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED WITH A LITTLE FORETHOUGHT FROM THE DEVELOPERS. WEoorUNDERSTÄND-or-THA T'7\"'I:ÖCAL....BANK -HAS - RECLA I MED ·"THE- CARSTON COURT""'PROPERTY'"'"FROM ~·THE-··DEVELOPER . I F THE CITY COUNC I L WOULD CONTACT THEM, OR THE PRESENT OWNERS, AND REQUEST THAT THIS MATTER BE LOOKED INTO AND RESOLVED TO THE HOMEOWNERS AND CITIES SATISFACTION, WE WOULD BE TRULY THANKFUL. THANKING YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION WE ARE SINCERELY YOURS CHRIS AND JEAN CHRISTIANSEN ~~ , AL AND DARELENE BERNARD 48 RIAT T~ BOB ND SAN A TAYLOR~ 4816 LAR~RAIL :~/~ ~~ AND DE~OUNKIN 4820 LARIAT TRAIL 1-'Y ö Ö ~ ~~ .£.c4...J .- /2- ¡/;:ti. jð-II- CA lI, 5 'f · ~, c..ðà.-;f.l ¿ :J .à ~ J¿ ~ I ,-t<¿ ctl'~ J 8 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of North Richland Hills '- ~-- Star of the Metroplex Richard Davis Councilman Place 3 May 30,1990 Mayor Tommy Brown City of North Richland Hills P.o. Box 820609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76182 Dear Mayor Brown: As your representative to the Regional Transportation Council I would appreciate your input on a matter that will directly affect Northeast Tarrant County. The enclosed draft for Mobility 2010 shows a proposed north freeway that was deleted at the last meeting of the RTC. At the next meeting June 14, 1990 the issue will be discussed again. Please forward the position that your city would take on if the freeway should be planned or not. Please feel free to call me at 335-7151 if you have any questions. Sincerely, C-~\~~Ð C. Richard Davis, Jr. Mayor Pro-Tempore CRDJr:mmm enclosure Paid for by Richard Davis Campaign, James A. Grant, Treasurer 6617 Hillside Court, North Rich1and Hills, TX 76180 (817) 281-8683 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I 0 Q en Ie to- N >- l.&- e: < >- ~ 0:: to- LLJ C. LLJ -' a:: ""- CD I C) :IE ~ c , .. .. 0 .. , ~ ~ l- I :II: C 0 III .. . III ~ III - · C III · · - III III II. . - W III . III · - III · · ::Þ ... 0 ... · · I- - ::Þ .. W II. .. ~ · I r I l I Ie I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 90-57 Date: June 7, 1990 Subject: Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Collection I Several questions were asked by developers at the impact fee public hearing Monday night, June 4th. I eventually answered all of those questions at the meeting, but have asked our consultants to also respond in writing concerning those same questions. My letter and their response are attached. Also attached is a response letter from our consultants concerning the Impact Fee Advisory Committee's meeting on May 24th. I I I The impact fee ordinance included for consideration in this packet allows for collection of water and wastewater impact fees to be prior to the issuance of a building permit and/or when application for water and/or sewer service is submitted" to the City. These impact fees are not proposed to be collected at time of platting from the developer. I If the ordinance is passed as presented, all lots or tracts of land wanting new or enlarged service connection onto the water and sewer system after June 11th, will be subject to payment of impact fees. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS I e City of JXõrth Richland Hills I I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .~ June 6, 1990 REF: PWL 90-149 Reed-stowe & Company 12770 Coit Road, Suite 1107 Dallas, Texas 75251 214/458-9388 Attn: Mr. Keith Reed RE: WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEES; Assessment and Collection of Fees At the Public Hearing Monday night, June 4th, several questions were asked by developers. I answered most of the questions, but would appreciate your response to the questions listed below. 1. If impact fees will be collected at the building permit application level, should the developer be refunded the assessable portion of any capital improvements he installs per the Impact Fee study CIP? 2. If water and sewer pro rata has been previously paid by a developer for a subdivision, should the individual lot owner have to pay lIimpact fees" when he applies for a building permit? 3. If a developer comes in and pays water and sewer connection fees for several vacant (previously developed) lots prior to adoption of impact fees, should impact fees be collected when the building permit is applied for after adoption of fees? Assume developer is the owner of the lots and he will be paying the monthly water and sewer bills even though no water will be used. Please reply concerning these questions as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact us. ens lic Works/utilities GWD/gkj cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manager (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180 I " I Its I I· I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~~~~-~IUW~ ~ ~U. ~~LLR~ ~144~~~~~~ t-' . Ir:j ~ ItEElt~STtt"'ß & t~t.. GOveRNMENTAL CONSULTfNG SERVICES June 6, 1990 Mr. Greg Dickens Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills P. o. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Dear Greg, In response to your letter of June 6,1990, concerning questions raised at the public hearing on June 4, 1990, the following is submitted: Q. If impact fees will be assessed and collected at building permit application level,' should the developer be refunded the assessable portion of any capi tal improvements he installs per the Impact Fee study CIP? A. Our response to this question is yes I the developer should be refunded the assessable portion only. Remember that the fees were calculated assuming that bonds would be sold for the entire project cost which formed the basis for the fee calculations. If the developer paid the assessable portion and the ci ty kept the entire Impact Fee, the City would in effect be collecting twice for the as,sessable portion. Q. If water and sewer pro rata has been previously paid by a developer for a subdivision, should individual lot owners or builders have to pay Impact Fees when they apply for a building permit? A. Our response to this question is yes a fee should be paid. Previously paid pro rata amounts were for facilities to qet service to the subdivision from the nearest point of contact. The pro rata fees and charges did not include the costs for facility expansion, both water and wastewater I wi thin the entire service area which are required to provide service to that particular subdivision. Q. If a developer pays water and sewer connect tees for vacant (undeveloped) lots prior to adoption of the official Impact Fees, should impact fees be collected when the building permit is applied for after adoption of fees? 12770 COlT ROAD AT L8J FWY.. SUITE 1107 OALLAS. TEXAS 75251 [214] 458..9388 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I REED-STOWE & co. DALLAS 21445SØ2~5 P.03 A. "After discussing this matter at length with leqal counsel, he is of the opinion that no Impact Fees would be due in this occurrence. His opinion is based upon the fact that water and wastewater service was already active and provided at the time of the adoption of the Impact Fees. Should add! tional information be required, please contact us 'at your convenience. s, I e City of JXòrth Richland Hills I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I June 6, 1990 MEMORANDUM : To: From: Greg Dickens, Director of Public Works Bob Miller, Director of Economic Development Subj: Water/Wastewater Impact Fees; Temporary Meters I contacted Mark Wood, Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission (Impact Fee Advisory Committee) relative to Keith Reed's letter dated June 5, 1990. In discussing the work session which was held on May 24, 1990, Chairman Wood and I are in agreement that it was the intent and recommendation of the Committee that temporary meters not be included in the impact fee analysis. Hopefully this will answer any question which Keith may have had relative to this matter. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Bob Miller cc: Mark Wood (817) 281-0041 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 P.O. BOX 18609 . . NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180 . I Its Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ItEElt-STtl\\'E & t~... GOVERNMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES June 5, 1990 íDJl ~ ~ Œ 0 ~ @ ..IT\:. f, '. '. ~ ,LS .-----" ~ t'i ¡I: . ¡ . \ u \ !:; ;;; \! ~\I JUN - 1\900 '. ': ¡ \ ,\ \ ' .' . 111\1 ìV\ iU 'ù¡ J Mr. Greg Dickens Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Dear Mr. Dickens, On May 24, 1990, the Impact Fee Advisory Committee convened in a called meeting to review the Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fee calculation as prepared by Knoulton-English-Flowers, Inc. (KEF) and Reed-Stowe & Company (R-S&Co.). During the course of that meeting KEF presented the ten year CIP for water and wastewater proposed projects for the City. This presentation outlined the rationale, assumptions, projections and estimated cost of the entire ten year plan which included those projects that were eligible to be included in Impact Fee calculation. At the conclusion of the CIP presentation, R-S&Co. presented and discussed the development of allowable Impact Fees for water and wastewater service in the City. This presentation included annual growth in Meter Unit Equivalent Services, (MUES), annual project expenditures, projected bond sale dates and amounts, estimated interest cost and the resulting Impact Fee calculations. After these two presentations, the committee engaged in quite lengthy discussions concerning fire line installations, projected bond sale dates, legality of planned Ft. Worth Impact Fees, program review and update scheduling, internal staff requirements, Mure engineering and consulting costs and temporary meters. These discussions resulted in a general concurrence on all matters except temporary meters. While this lone matter would appear to be minor in nature, we are of the opinion that the advisory committee should come to some resolution and forward that recommendation to the council. 1 2770 COlT ROAD AT L8J FVVY. I SUITE 11 07 DALLAS. TEXAS 75251 (214) 458-9388 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I ~I I I I Ie I On June 4, 1990, the City Council held a public hearing on the C.I.P. and calculated Impact Fees. Presentations were made by KEF and R-S & Co.. At the conclusion of these presentations, council members addressed any remaining questions to City Staff members as well as project consultants. At the conclusion of this question and answer portion of the hearing, the floor was opened to any citizen who wished to speak to the public hearing topic. Several members of the development community addressed the council on a variety of specific development projects within the city. At the conclusion of all presentations and all interested parties comments, Mayor Pro-tern Davis declared the public hearing closed and stated that the entire council would consider the implementation of Impact Fees at the meeting of June 11, 1990. The final action required of the City to implement Impact Fees in accordance with Chapter 395, Local Government code, is the formal action of the council on June 11th, or anytime prior to July 4th, to approve the CIP and implement the calculated fees. At that time the City will have fulfil/ed the mandated requirements of developing and imposing Impact Fees. Should any additional information be required or assistance be desired, please contact us at telephone no. (214) 458-9388. Respectfully, ~~ Keith Reed KR/dc I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - MAY 14, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order May 14, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Mayor Richard Davis Mayor Pro Tem lyle E. Welch Councilman Mack Garvin Councilman Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman Byron Sibbet Councilman Linda Spurlock Councilwoman Staff: Rodger N. Line City Manager Dennis Horvath Deputy City Manager C.A. Sanford Assistant City Manager Patricia Hutson Assistant City Secretary Rex McEntire Attorney Greg Dickens City Engineer Absent: Charles Scoma Jeanette Rewis Councilman City Secretary 3. INVOCATION Councilman Sibbet gave the invocation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING APRIL 23, 1990 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve the minutes of the April 23, 1990 meeting. Motion carried 5-0; Councilman Welch abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 5. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING MAY 7, 1990 APPROVED I I ~ I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I May 14, 1990 Page 2 Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, to approve the minutes of the May 7, 1990 special meeting. Motion carried 6-0. 31. RESOLUTION OF CEDARCREST DRIVE REPAIR ISSUE (IF NEEDED) Mayor Brown advised that Item No. 31 would be heard at this time. Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to authorize the City Manager to allocate an additional $7,000 on the Beach Street Connector Water Line project. Jack Lewis, Mayor of Haltom City, appeared before the Council. Mayor lewis stated he would take the proposal back to his City Council; that Haltom City had only authorized their participation to a maximum of $30,000. Motion carried 6-0. 6. PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. PARK BOARD MINUTES No action needed. 7. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA None. 8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (17, 20, 21, 25 & 30) APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 6-0. 9. PZ 90-01 PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF REVISIONS TO ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 - ORDINANCE NO. 1672 APPROVED Mr. Mark Wood, Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission, appeared before the Council. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I May 14, 1990 Page 3 Mr. Wood stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission had spent a great deal of time revising and updating the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Wood stated he would answer any questions anyone might have. Councilman Garvin thanked the Planning and Zoning Commission for their hard work updating and revising the Zoning Ordinance. Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor to come forward. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No. 1672. Motion carried 6-0. 10. PZ 90-06 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF JAMES R. HARRIS COMPANY TO REZONE PART OF TRACT 1, BRENTWOOD ESTATES, FROM ITS PRESENT CLASSIFICATION OF AG AGRICULTURE TO R-2 SINGLE FAMILY (LOCATED WEST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD, NORTH OF SHADY GROVE ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS) Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor to please come forward. Mr. Gary Teague, Consulting Engineer with Teague, Nall and Perkins, appeared before the Council. Mr. Teague stated the tract consisted of approximately 17 to 18 acres and was presently zoned Agriculture. Mr. Teague stated the applicant desired to rezone it to R-2 Single Family. Mr. Teague stated the tract would be incorporated with another piece of R-2 zoned property. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. Councilman Sibbet asked how the property would be egressed. Mr. Teague stated the ingress/egress would be off of Shady Grove. Councilman Sibbet asked if any consideration had been given for a neighborhood playground. Mr. Teague stated to the best of his knowledge there was no allocation for a playground. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I May 14, 1990 Page 4 There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. 11. ORDINANCE NO. 1673 APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No. 1673. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that Mr. Harris was a client of his but that he did not have any financial interest or ownership in this piece of property. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked the Attorney if this was a conflict of interest. Mr. McEntire stated that it was not a conflict of interest. Motion carried 6-0. 12. PZ 90-07 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF SANDLIN-BARFIELD JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE PART OF TRACT 7A4, S. RICHARDSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1266, FROM ITS PRESENT CLASSIFICATION OF AG AGRICULTURE TO R-1 SINGLE FAMILY (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD JUST EAST OF THE ENTRANCE OF THORNBRIDGE ADDITION) Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor to please come forward. Mr. Doug Long, Engineer, appeared before the Council. Mr. long stated this was a 3,000 square foot piece of property that Mr. Barfield was working with to square up another lot. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to the request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. 13. ORDINANCE NO. 1674 APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No. 1674. Motion carried 6-0. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I May 14, 1990 Page 5 14. PZ 90-08 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF CRESTVIEW ESTATES JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE A PART OF TRACT 1, BRENTWOOD ESTATES, FROM ITS PRESENT CLASSIFICATION OF AG AGRICULTURE TO C-1 COMMERCIAL (LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND SHADY GROVE ROAD) Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor to please come forward. Mr. Doug Long, Engineer, appeared before the Council. Mr. Long stated they were requesting that this tract of land be zoned Commercial. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. 15. ORDINANCE NO. 1675 APPROVED Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to approve Ordinance No. 1675. Motion carried 6-0. 16. GN 90-75 PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF A REVISION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NO. 1579 - ORDINANCE NO. 1668 APPROVED Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor to please come forward. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve Ordinance No. 1668. Motion carried 6-0. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I May 14, 1990 Page 6 *17. PS 90-03 REQUEST OF JULIO NEIRA FOR REPLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 3, J. L. AUTREY ADDITION (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF GLENVIEW DRIVE AND RITA BETH STREET) APPROVED 18. PS 90-09 REQUEST OF L.C. TUBB, JR. FOR SHORT FORM PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, L. C. TUBB, JR. SUBDIVISION (LOCATED AT 8333 DAVIS BOULEVARD) APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve PS 90-09 with the following stipulations: 1) that the easement required in Item #3 of Mr. Miller's review letter be a 15 foot easement over the existing pipeline; 2) that sidewalks not be required, but applicant sign a covenant to pay his fair share of a sidewalk, to cover city expense, should it be required by the State Highway Department or City of North Richland Hills; 3) applicant dedicate a 25 foot easement along the rear of the property for drainage; 4) applicant meet all county requirements regarding the septic tank and lateral field; and 5) that the fire hydrant on the west side of Davis Boulevard be installed as required. Mr. L.C. Tubb, 8333 Davis Boulevard, applicant, appeared before the Council. Mr. Tubb stated he appreciated the Council's time and their favorable vote. Motion carried 6-0. 18a. PS 90-13 REQUEST OF AMSTAR PROPERTIES FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1, NORTH EDGLEY ADDITION APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve PS 90-13 subject to the Planning and Zoning Commissions' recommendations. Councilwoman Spurlock asked what type of screening fence would be constructed. Mr. Johnny Campbell, representing Amstar Properties, appeared before the Council. Mr. Campbell stated tHey planned on constructing a solid wood screening fence at the rear of the property. Mr. Campbell explained that they owned the surrounding property. Mr. Campbell stated they would only be fencing the portion that was being developed now. Motion carried 6-0. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I May 14, 1990 Page 7 19. GN 90-74 PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF REVISIONS TO THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN, ORDINANCE NO. 1538 - ORDINANCE NO. 1676 APPROVED Mr. Line stated that it was the consensus in Pre-Council to recess the public hearing after hearing from anyone wishing to speak. Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor to please come forward. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to adjourn the Public Hearing to June 25th, 1990. Motion carried 6-0. *20. GN 90-76 ABANDONMENT OF RIGHT-OF-WAY (PORTION OF LYNDA DRIVE) _ ORDINANCE NO. 1669 APPROVED *21. GN 90-77 SETTING DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON ADOPTION OF IMPACT FEES FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS _ RESOLUTION NO. 90-26 APPROVED 22. GN 90-79 GIVING CREDIT ON HIGHTOWER DRIVE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT _ ORDINANCE NO. 1677 APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve Ordinance No. 1677. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated it would behoove the City to adopt an assessment paving policy. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he was not in favor of changing the assessment ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked staff to look into an assessment policy. Councilman Garvin stated he would like to serve on the committee when it was put together. Councilwoman Spurlock asked if the area was in a flood plain. Councilman Garvin stated that it was. Motion carried 5-1; Councilwoman Spurlock, Councilmen Garvin, Metts, Sibbet and Welch voting for and Mayor Pro Tem Davis voting against. I- I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I II I I Ie I May 14, 1990 Page 8 23. GN 90-80 APPOINTMENT TO CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to appoint Jim Keating as Alternate Place 2 on the Civil Service Commission. Motion carried 6-0. 24. GN 90-81 APPOINTMENT TO BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION APPROVED Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to appoint Rusty Moore as Alternate to the Beautification Commission. Motion carried 6-0. *25. PU 90-20 APPROVE PURCHASE OF WATER LINE FROM SPINDLETOP SAVINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF D.L. HALL WATER TRANSMISSION LINE (PARCEL #4) APPROVED 26. PU 90-21 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM CINDY FUNDERBURK FOR MAPLEWOOD AVENUE BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS AT CALLOWAY BRANCH APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve PU 90-21. Motion carried 6-0. 27. PU 90-22 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM ROY G. AND BRENDA L. HORD FOR MAPLEWOOD AVENUE BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS AT CALLOWAY BRANCH APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve PU 90-22. Motion carried 6-0. 28. PW 90-23 AWARD OF BID ON MAPLEWOOD AVENUE BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to award the bid to Orval Hall Excavating in the amount of $699,497.50 for 360 calendar days and approve the transfer of funds as outlined in Option 1. I- I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I May 14, 1990 Page 9 Motion carried 6-0. 29. PW 90-24 APPROVE REIMBURSEMENT TO ARCO FOR PIPELINE ADJUSTMENTS ON MAPLEWOOD BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Resolution No. 90-27. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if the City had a commitment from ARCO yet. Mr. Dickens stated the City did not have a commitment at this time. Mayor Pro Tern Davis requested that ARCO provide the City with a time schedule. Motion carried 6-0. *30. PAY 90-08 FINAL PAY ESTIMATE - FIRE STATION NO. 2 APPROVED 31. RESOLUTION OF CEDARCREST DRIVE REPAIR ISSUE (IF NEEDED) (Moved to beginning of Agenda). 32. CITIZENS PRESENTATION None 33. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 6-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I city of .North Wchland Wlls WHEREAS, the. MayoJt a.nd Cliy CouncU.t aILe ex:tJtemei.q gJt4t.e6uL when 40me.one. .ið willing t.o g'¿ve 06 :thÚ1t .time and .tatent4 ~o the be;ttvune.nt 06 Noltth JUc.hla.nd Hilh; and WHEREAS, thoJ¡e who vo~nt.eVl demo~.tJuz;te thebL c.onc.eIln 60Jt the be.ttvune.nt. 06 the C.OrnJ7UfÚ.ty; a.nd WHEREAS, LiÃa. 'Dye de.ðeJr.ve.ð Jtec.ogni.tion 60Jt 4Vlv'¿ng 46 an a:t:toltney 60Jt the Teen CoWtt 06 Noltth lUc.hl.a.nd Hilh . NOW, THEREFORE, I , Tommy B1Lown, MayoJt 06 the CliJj 06 NolLth lUc.hl.a.nd Hilh, do hvr.eby pJtoc.laim LWa. 'Dye. ~o be an 464U ~o .the C.01l1l1lLnity a.nd. wr.ge all cLtiZe.n6 06 NoJtth fUc.hl.a.nd Hilh ~o Jtec.ognize ~a. 60Jt he.Jt w..Ulingneð4 ~o 4e.Jtve. .~ :~,. ~ :-,' ';.~'.'~~y'-~:.., '-~'~~~' . ,- . . . - Y' _-:~:;, . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have he.Jteu.n:to 4 e.t. my hand a.nd. c.au.ð ed .the 4 eai.. 06 the Cay 06 NolLth fUc.hi.a.nd Hilh hJ be. 466.ixed th.ið the 11 tit da.q 06 June, 1990. ~o~~ ,~..~-~. '. ~; ':..-~., .;,,",~-:Ò;"."#'J :~""::,.." "'i1'~~:;;'t'h ;..;:. ~ "'7 :~.~.~~. ~~.(. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I -" C-.... _ city of ~orth ~chland Hills WHEREAS, the. Mayoll and. Cliy Cou.ncil. Me. e.x:tJt.emei..y glUl.te.6ul when ~ome.one. .ú w.i.il.ing to give. Ob theÁ.JL time. and. taLenú to the. bet.tvr.men:t 06 NoJt:th JUc.hla.nd H..i.llð; and WHEREAS, tho~e. who voi.u.nt.e.eJL demon6Vr.a.te. theÁJl c.o nc.VUt 6 Oil the. b et.tvunen:t 06 the. c.ommuni:ty; and WHEREAS, Shannon Mc.CaJLthy duvr.vu Ile.c.ogni;ti..on 60IL ~eJtv.ing 4ð an a.ttOItne.y bolt the. Te.en CoWLt 06 NolLth TUc.h1.and H..i.llð. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Tommy Bltown, Mayolt 06 the. Cliy 06 NolLth JUc.h1.and H..i.llð, do hvr.e.b y pllO ci.ai.m Sha.nno n Mc.CaJLthy to be. an 4ð~d :to the. c.omrtlLnity a.nd wr.ge. aU cú.tize.n6 06 NolLth JUc.h1.and H..i.llð to Ile.c.og M.Z e. Shanno n 60lt heJt w.U.lingneð~ to .6vr.ve.. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I ha.ve. heJLe.u.nto ~ d my hand. and. C.aLLð ed .the. ~ eat 06 the. Cliy 06 NoJt:th JUc.h1.and H..i.llð 1:0 be. a.66'¿xed .t.h.i.ð .the. 11 th da.y 06 Ju.ne., 1990. L ~ -.. II T ommlJ Œwn, 011. .:. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I ,I I I I I Ie I --- city of ~orth WcWand ~ls . . . WHEREAS, the Mayoll and Cliy Council. Me exbteme.ty gJUúe6uL when .6ome.one i...6 wilLing to give 06 thehr. .time and~.talUIÚ to the beftvunen.t 06 NoJtth JUc.hland. H.iU6¡ and . . WHEREAS, tho~ e who volu.n;t;eVL demo n.6.tJuLte .theM. c.onc.eJUt 601l the bet;tvune.nt 06 the c.ommunUy¡ and. ~·~f~~ - i. ~ WfŒREAS, J 0 na:tha.n Mil.lVL de.ð VLV U Ilec.og nUion 60IL ~vr.v.ing a.6 a.n a;t;toltney 60IL the Teen CoWLt 06 NoJtth 1Uchla.nd. H.iU6. NOW, THEREFORE, I , Tommy 8JLown, MayolL 06 the Cliy 06 NoJLth 1U.c.hiA.nd H.iU6, do hvr.eby plloci.tLún Jona:tha.n Mil.lvr. to be a.n a.6.6 d to the c.omnt.trLity and UJtg e all ci.tizenð 06 NoJtth JUc.hland. H.iU6 t.o IL.ec.ognize Jona:tha.n 6 OIL. hi..6 w.il.Ling nu.ð t.o .ð vr.ve. -50.~ ~.: . ...._. '. -¿:7~';""·:· -'. .,...:)í.;.:~~ .~i'¡¡.~~,+,<~~~~~.~..~~~" . .~,Øi7'!~~' '~~..)~;..;~~~,ú~: , ~ · .. - .-'' <;, "- ~ ~ .,~~\:;.-,.~ . '.' :J' .....~...~..:..... - .. ~~ . w. '.. ,,- ''';i; .~~~_... ;. ~...._...... ..., . ',r..- ..-=': . _~. ;.~.... . ~~~:.... .... ....~.. ~.L:"'::~.~"-· ~ !:"~,,,...'~ .~::~~~.. .~:. ~:.~..~...:,.~ .~~-~. ..:~:~.si""""~. " . -,.f.~..;~.':: !t'.:.' '.~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hVteu.n.to .ð e.t my hand a.nd c.au..ð e.d the ~ eal. 06 t;he Cliy 06 NoJ[;th Ric.hla.nd H~ t.o be 466åe.d t.JtiÄ the 11 th . daq 06 June, 1990. ~r:;'~~ l ommy wn, a. OJt. . - ~~ - . J "_ -... :;-..;¡ ~~.... -r- ,.:'" ..:...1:. ~.' .:. .~ . - . . .....'<'r.~:--... L., ~~ ."~~'" '~.. .~:.~<: ¢:!:..~.:~.: .~~~:~. .~~.~~.-- I I Ie I I I I -- ... ~ .~_..~-~ city of . .North -mcWand.-HiÍls . ...-~- :~ 5t . " ~""'...'~, .=:'. .~~ '" ; .-. ...;,_....-, . ." '- ~ - - ~':-'" _~l!"',-.þ..;.·.·... . ~}·~~.;~:.t~~:~ ~-·r": . -......~*~ ~ WHEREAS, the, MayoIL and Cliy Council aile, e,xnemeiJJ ')' ....~ glULte6ul when ~omeone, i..ð wilLing to g.ive 06 theht ~e. '- : . a.M....ttLtent.ð ~o the, bátvrme.n,t 06 ·NolLth fUcltlo.nd HilLð; . and . -~..itft'·~:~.~S!!:'.~';:..,._:~'- I I Ie I I ~ , ;.:~, .-~:~~.~, ~ WHEREAS, thO.6e. who volu.nt.e.eIL demonðbu1:te. t:hw' '. .~. coac.eJtn 60IL the. bdtvrme.nt 06 the. c.omnlLni:ty; a.nd. '~'*:'1-'--~:';-_' . - . . ~- '.~ 'r - WHEREAS, AnthonlJ Sc.oma duvr.vu 1Le,c.ogni.tion 6011. ~eIlv.ing a.ð a membvr. 06 the. Te,e,n CoWtt Adv.i6olUJ 80aJul. a.nd 4ð an aftolUte.y 6 OIL the. T e,e.n CoWtt 06 NolLth 1Uc.h.ta.n4 HilLð . . ., .-- -(.' ,'~;"'-': ~.~ .; .,¡. _ M'I>- ...¡ - "" . NOfII, THEREFORE, I, T ormy BJLown, MayoIL 06 the. Ci.:ty 06 NolLth JUc.hi.and. HilLð, do hvr.e.by pJLociJLún An;thony SC.oma. t.o be. an 46~et t.o the. c.orrrnl.l.nit.y and Wtge. all cLtize.nð 06 Noltth lUc.hi.and. HilLð ~o JLe.c.ognize. Anthony 60IL hú wilLingnu~ to .ðvr.ve.. I I I ''¢ I I I- I I N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have. heILeu.nt.o ~et my hand and c.au.6ed the. .ðe.a.L 06 the. Cliy 06 NolLth JUc.hi.and. HilLð to be. a66.ixed t;hi..6 the. J 1 tit da.y, 06 June, 1990. ...:. 1- .<:~~¿; ;r _ . _., .., ,,~., ro. -,..~ .,." >..._-.,.:". ,J- ~}~-~ - ~1fJ!I WK. ayoJr. ~~ . :~~t·::.·"'~ .:..,~~;;.~ '.. -.~:" '~.' + ~.~~~ \.\"~ . .' .~~~ " .~ '. '..:""......~ ''S'4 ;v.... ~ . ~",., ........."rJ: . .. .... .~... .if ~tIJ....:.~;¡..~ -'. . ~.'- .-:, ' .. ~ ~ ~ .' '. '. 'V ......,1.;.... . - -. -....: y~..- . ~:f'!.·:.···"·~::>;' ~7:~·;:~'.t~~':+!'·~~L~~·· =:~?~~~~~{~~t?~~~~:;;;r~~~!~~~~i~~~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date. 6/11/90 Adoption of Resolution Confirming Cooperatlon and · Subject: Participation in Tarrant County's Community DevelopmenÂgendaNumber.GN 90-83 Block Grant Program, 1991-1993 - Resolutlon No. 9U-3U · The attached resolution confirms the City's participation in Tarrant County's Community Development Block Grant Program. The City is required to pass a resolution in order to join the County in obtaining Federal allocation of the Block Grant Funding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 90-30. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I RESOLUTION NO. 90-30 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS· PARTICIPATION IN TARRANT COUNTY'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE THREE PROGRAM YEAR PERIOD, JULY 17, 1991 THROUGH JULY 16, 1993 WHEREAS, the 93rd Session of the Congress passed and the President of the u.s. signed into law, the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 for the specific purpose of developing viable communities; and WHEREAS, Tarrant County has been designated as an "Urban County" by the Department of Housing and Urban Development entitled to a formula share of the program funds provided said County has a combined population of 200,000 persons in its unincorporated areas and units of general local government with which it has entered into cooperative agreements; and WHEREAS, Article III, Section 64 of the Texas Constitution authorizes Texas counties to enter into cooperative agreements with local governments for essential Community Development and Housing Assistance activities; and WHEREAS, through cooperative agreement Tarrant County has authority to carry activities funded from annual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) from Federal Fiscal Years 1991, 1992, and 1993 appropriations and from any program income generated from the expenditure of such funds; and WHEREAS, Tarrant County and the City of North Richland Hills agree to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing; and WHEREAS, Tarrant County will not fund activities in support of any cooperating unit of general government that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes the county's actions to comply with its fair housing certification; and WHEREAS, Tarrant County and the City of North Richland Hills shall take all actions necessary to assure compliance with the Urban County's certification required by section 104 (b) of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, section 109 of Title I of the Housing Community Development Act of 1974; and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills agrees to inform the county of any income generated by the expenditure of CDBG funds received, and that any such program income must be paid to the county to be used for eligible activities in accordance with all Community Development Block Grant requirements; and I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page Two RESOLUTION NO. 90-30 WHEREAS, Tarrant County is responsible for monitoring and reporting to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development on the use of any such program income and that in the event of close-out or change in status of the City of North Richland Hills, any program income that is on hand or received subsequent to the close-out or change in status shall be paid the county; and WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills agrees to notify Tarrant County if any modification or change in the use of the real property from that planned at the time of acquisition or improvement including disposition, and further agrees to reimburse the County in an amount equal to the current fair market value (less any portion thereof attributable to expenditure of non-CDBG funds) of property acquired or improved with CDBG funds that is sold or transferred for a use which does not qualify under the CDBG regulations; and WHEREAS, any money generated from disposition or transfer of property will be treated as program income and returned to the county prior to or subsequent to the close-out, change of status or termination of the cooperation agreement between county and the City of North Richland Hills; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of North Richland Hills that the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas supports the application of Tarrant County funding of Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, and asks that its population be included for three successive years with that of Tarrant County, Texas to carry out Community Development Program Activities Eligible for Assistance under Public Law 93-383, and authorized the Mayor of North Richland Hills, Texas to sign such additional forms as requested by the Department of Housing and Urban Development pursuant to the purposes of the Resolution, and further that the City of North Richland Hills, Texas understands that Tarrant County will have final responsibility for selecting projects and filing annual grant requests. PASSED AND APPROVED this 11th day of June, 1990. APPROVED: ATTEST: Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND lEGALITY: Attorney for the City Commissioners' Court Clerk County Judge ~ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Oth r I. I I I I I I I I I' Ie I l~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works/Utilities Department: Council Meeting Date: 06/11/90 Subject: Approve Budget for Geographical Information ~YiìtQIR «(;I~) Agenda Number: GN 90-84 The budget for the subject system is proposed for your consideration as discussed at the GIS Workshop May 21st. The budget shown below includes Watauga's aerial photography costs and consultant's fee for all initial data entry. We may be able to save part of these costs due to City of Watauga recently having aerial photography flown and our technician entering part of the base data. In response to concerns raised at the GIS Workshop, Kane Kelly, M.I.S. Director, has further researched the use of the IBM AS400 with the GIS. Kane has reconfirmed that the AS400 could only be a repository or file server if connected to an IBM compatible system (i.e. Risc 6000 with AIX operating system). The cost to upgrade the AS400 disk storage to an acceptable level for the GIS data storage would be cost prohibitive. The staff strongly recommends the GIS computer system function separately from the AS400. The following is a summary of the proposed budget with a breakdown of each phase attached. PROPOSED GIS BUDGET Description of Item Cost Estimate * Equipment (computer, file server, plotter, and digitizer) $ 80,800 * Software (ARC/INFO program with upgrade license) $ 46,000 * Surveys (aerial photography and topographic mapping for total utility service area) $160,000 * Consulting Engineer's Services (digitize geographical information into computer) $182,200 * Technician $ 34,000 ---------- Total $503,000 Finance Review .R.IDl.- X , Finance Director e artment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM PanA 1 of I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROPOSED BUDGET SCHEDULE Description of Item Cost Estimate Phase I (Surveys) 7/90 to 7/91 $160,000 Phase II (Hire technician and buy initial equipment and software) 1/91 to 4/91 $ 92,000 Phase III (Consulting engineer's services) 1/91 to 10/91 $182,200 Phase IV (Purchase multiuser equipment & software) 7/91 to 10/91 $ 68,800 ----------- Total $503,000 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEAR EXPENSES 1989/90 1990/91 $160,000 $343,000 --------- Total $503,000 Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available in unencumbered bond monies from previous bond sales and the current 1989/90 operating budget. Transferred From: Budget 1984 Revenue Bonds 1986 Revenue Bonds 1989/90 Operating Budget $240,000 205,000 58,000 --------- Transferred To: Utility GIS System $503,000 Recommendation: The staff recommends Council approve the budget, phasing schedule and transfer of funds for the utility GIS and authorize staff to commence with Phased implementation. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I Public Works aDepartment: ~ Enforcement of Flood Damage Prevention I Subject: Ordin¡mcQ (#1471), RQ~olutioR Wo 90-21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Ie Operating Budget Othe I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 06/11/90 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: GN 90-85 The City has a continuing violation of Ordinance #1471 by Jeff T. Graham and wife Vickie Graham of 7301 Chapman. They have constructed a permanent barrier across a large drainage channel, Calloway Branch. The department has written the attached letters seeking abatement of the violation. Our ordinance is the vehicle for all persons in the City to enable purchase of flood insurance. If the City fails to enforce the ordinance, it jeopardizes all citizens in or near the flood plain who wish to purchase flood insurance. The ordinance is in the form prescribed by the federal government with a provider for civil enforcement. Resolution No.90-21 authorizes civil enforcement. Recommendation: The staff and attorney recommends the Council pass Resolution No. 90-21. Finance Review Acct. Number N/A Sufficient Funds Available - . Finance Director ment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I II - I I RESOLUTION NO. 90-21 Whereas, continuing violations of the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (#1471) jeopardizes the ability of citizens of the city seeking to buy flood insurance; and Whereas, the Department of Public Works has attempted to abate a violation of said ordinance which has occurred by virtue of a fence being constructed across the Drainage Channel on Tract 3B1, W. Mann Survey, Abstract 1010; and Whereas, the owners of the subject property have failed or refused to abate the violation. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: The Public Works Department and the Department of Law of the City are hereby authorized to go forward with a civil suit to enforce the provisions of Ordinance No. 1471 against the owners and/or occupants of Tract 3Bl, W. Mann Survey, Abstract 1010. PASSED AND APPROVED the day of 1990. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY Rex McEntire, Attorney I ~ I . City of JXõrth Richland Hills I I I I I I I Ie I I I II I I I Ie I May 22, 1990 REF: PWL 90-135 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Prevention Section 800 North Loop 288 Denton, Texas 76201 817/898-9399 RE: TRACT 3B1, W. MANN SURVEY, Abstract A-lOla, North Richland Hills, Texas Gentlemen: The city has attempted to abate a violation of Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (#1471) which is taking place on the above tract. I am enclosing a copy of our letter of May 8, 1990 and letter of May 22, 1990 to the owners, Jeff T. and Vickie Graham. On May 1, 1990 the undersigned and another official of the City visited with Jeff Graham concerning this violation. He produced some documents from FEMA which he claims is proof of this property being out of the floodway and floodplain. The documents indicated that they pertained to flood insurance on his house and contained a notation that they were subject further documentation. This violation does not pertain to the house. It involves a fence which has been constructed without a permit across the designated floodway. Please check your files to see whether or not they contain any information dealing with this fence. We will contact you by phone prior to June 11, 1990, the date of our next Council meeting. We are making every effort to comply with all of your rules concerning violation of the ordinance. We expect to request the Council's authorization to civilly enforce this violation. If you have any questions please contact us. -t~ Joh A. Johnston, P .E. ~ Assistant Director of Public Works JAJ/gkj cc: Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, Director of Public Works/utilities Mr. Rex McEntire, Attorney Mr. Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manager (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of J:{õrth Richland Hills _~rkt_ ø\~ May 22, 1990 Mr. Jeff T. or Vickie Graham 7301 Chapman Road North Richland Hills, Tx 76180 REF: PWL 90-091 RE: FENCE CONSTRUCTED ACROSS THE FLOODWAY, W. Mann Survey, Abstract 1010 Tract 3Bl Mr. and Mrs. Graham: The department's letter of May 8, 1990 to you has apparently been ignored. We again call upon you to abate this violation of the Flood Damage Control Ordinance. This item will be placed upon the Council agenda during the month of June seeking authorization to civilly enforce the ordinance by mandatory injunction. ~j¿(7j~ +c\~ John A. JO~tct-, P.E. Assistant Director of Public Works JAJ/gkj cc: Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, Director of Public Works/Utilities Mr. Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City Mr. Danny Taylor, Director of Community Development (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.o. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS 76180 I ,/ I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I e I I ~ (Ø/ City of J:{õrth Richland Hills jJJ May 8, 1990 REF: PWL 90-118 Mr. Jeff T. or Vickie Graham 7301 Chapman North Richland Hills, Tx 76180 RE: Fence Constructed Without Permit and Across Floodway W. MANN SURVEY, A-1010 TRACT 3Bl Dear Sir: Recent inspection of the above mentioned property reveals you are in violation of: 1. City Ordinance No. 1080, Section 24.13.1 which states: "Permit required: No fence shall be erected or replaced and no required fence shall be removed without a fence permit obtained from the city Enforcing Officer. A person desiring a pe~it to erect or remove or replace any fence shall make written application to the City Enforcing Officer, which application shall designate the location of the fence on the lot, the height of the fence and the materials of which the fence is to be constructed.n 2. Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas Ordinance No. 1471; Article 5; Section E; Paragraph (1), which states: "Encroachments are prohibited, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certification by a professional registered engineer or architect is provided demonstrating that encroachments shall not result in any "adverse effect" on the carrying capacity of the IOO-year flood plain during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. II The purpose of this ordinance is to minimize losses due to flood. In order for persons in the floodway or floodplain to get flood insurance, the city was forced to pass the ordinance. OUr failure to enforce it, could result in all of our affected citizens being unable to qet flood insurance. (817) 281-0041 · 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18&09 · NORTH AICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180 I I. I I I I I I I 1- I I I I I I I I- I You are hereby requested to abate these violations prior to May 21, 1990. Failure to comply with this request may result in enforcement by civil action in accordance with the subject ordinances. Your cooperation in the handling of this matter will be appreciated. ÇJ~~.-L Assistant Director of Public Works JAJ/gkj cc:~ Gregory W. Dickens, Director of Public Works/Utilities Mr. Danny Taylor, Director of Community Development I I I Subject: I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: 6/11/90 Council Meeting Date: GN 90-86 Agenda Number: Administration Iron Horse Golf Course - Proposed Policy Changes Recreational Services, Ltd. has recommended that 14 changes and/or additions to the operating policies at Iron Horse Golf Course be made. After a review of the recommended changes at their May 29, 1990 meeting, the Golf Ad Hoc Committee was in agreement that the changes be adopted. Recommendation: It is the recommendation of the Golf Ad Hoc Committee, City staff and Recreational Services, Ltd. that the attached amendments to the operating policies at Iron Horse Golf Course be approved. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget 1_ Other · ~~ - Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director II I Department Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 1 Page 1 of I, I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE PROPOSED POLICY CHANGES ITEM PROPOSED 1. Identify "Prime Time" as all day Friday, Saturday, Sundays and Holidays until twilight. 2. Identify Twilight as: A. November 1 - February 28,2:30 - Dusk B. March 1 - 31 and October 1 - 31, 3:00 - Dusk C. September 1 - 30, 4:00 - Dusk D. April 1 - August 31,5:00 - Dusk 3. Tee times may not be made for twilight golf. Twilight golf as identified above will begin on a first-come, first-served basis. 4. Require that prime time tee times be given only to threesomes and foursomes. Twosomes may not secure prime time tee times, but may during non prime time hours. 5. Foursomes will be required at all times unless the professional in charge deems it possible for twosomes to not disturb play. 6. Fivesomes will not be permitted during prime tin1e and only during non prime time hours with approval from the professional in charge. 7. Golf group outings will be permitted during non prime time hours only. 8. Shotgun starts win be permitted with a minimum of 250 guaranteed players. 9. Group outings of 16 players or more may book golf space one year in advance. 10. Group outings must reserve space with a $100 deposit payable to Iron Horse Golf Course. This will be a security deposit and will be returned one week after the event. 11. All final payment must be made in full on the day of the event. I- I Ie I I I I I I Ie II I I I I I I Ie I PROPOSED POLICY CHANGES MAY 29,1990 12. Individual billing will be permitted for groups of under 24 people. 13. Course marshals shall enforce the following slow play policy: A. If a group is behind the established pace, a polite acknowledgment of slow play will be given. B. If a group's slow play continues, a polite slow play warning vlill be gIven. C. The third contact with a slow group will result in the group moving, at that time, to their appropriate place on the course. D. If there is further contact, the group will be asked to leave the golf course. An appropriate refund or range credit will be given by the golf professional in charge. 14. If the course is closed due to inclement weather and play has already begun, all players will be refunded their green fee and cart expenses based on the foJlowing schedule. The course must be declared closed before refunds will be issued. A. If six or less holes are played, the patron will be reimbursed 100% of their green fee and cart expense. If seven to twelve holes are played, 50% of the green fee and cart expense will be reimbursed. If thirteen to seventeen holes are played, 25% of the green fee and cart expense will be refunded. B. c. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Council Meeting Date: 6/11/90 ubject: Property Tax Refund Agenda Number: GN 90-87 The Texas Property Tax Code Section 31.11 (a) requires that refunds over $500 be approved by the governing body. The following refund requests have been received. Taxpayer Amount Reason for Refund The Kroger Company $1,848.63 Appraisal District had improvement value on the wrong account. Federal Asset Mtg. $ 809.80 Overpayment of Taxes Recommendation The tax office recommends approval of the refunds as outlined above. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Ava' I nce Director '-- ~7/t- ~ u ~ ~/ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I Public Works/utility Department: 4It Adoption of Water and Wastewater I <:)ubject: Tmract Fees - Ordinance blo 167Q Agenda Number: GN 90-88 This ordinance will allow the City to collect impact fees from new water I and/or wastewater customers when they apply for building permit or when they request service connection to the system(s). The impact fee collection schedule in the ordinance reflects the 100% allowable fee levels as calculated by our consultants in accordance with Senate 'Bill #336 (Chapter I 235 of the Texas Local Government Code). I I I I Ie I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date: 06/11/90 The fees collected per this ordinance will be spent for water and wastewater capital improvements as outlined in Exhibit "B" (Water and Wastewater Impact Fee study Capital Improvements Plan) of the ordinance. All legal prerequisites to adopting this ordinance have been complied with. Since the public hearing on the adoption of impact fees was held June 4th, Council must by law take some type of action concerning these fees by July 4, 1990. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~ Operating Budget . Other - Finance Review Acct. Number N/ A Sufficient Funds Available Ç)~~JJ~ ment Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1679 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS APPROVING AND ADOPTING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR AND IMPOSING WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING TIME FOR COLLECTION OF IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING FOR THE ACCOUNTING OF FEES AND INTEREST; PROVIDING FOR REFUNDS; PROVIDING FOR UPDATE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 395, as amended ( the "Code") (formerly Tex. Rev. Civ. stat. Ann. art. 1269j-4.11, as amended), provides a procedure enabling municipalities to enact impact fees; and WHEREAS, on April 23, 1990, the City Council conducted a public hearing, after compliance with all legal prerequisites, to consider land use assumptions to be used to develop a capital improvements plan pursuant to which water and wastewater impact fees would be imposed; and WHEREAS, on April 23, 1990, after compliance with all legal prerequisites, the City Council approved the land use assumptions; and WHEREAS, on June 4, 1990, the City council conducted a public hearing, after compliance with all legal prerequisites, to consider adopting a capital improvements plan and imposing water and wastewater impact fees within the designated service area (the "Service Area" shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby desires to adopt the capital improvements plan for water and wastewater improvements (the "Water and Wastewater Impact Fee study Capital Improvements Plan") attached hereto as Exhibit liB" which was considered at the June 4, 1990 public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee study Capital Improvements Plan was developed by qualified professionals using generally accepted engineering and planning practices in accordance with Section 395.014 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that all legal prerequisites has been complied with. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Inclusions That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in their entirety. SECTION 2. Capital Improvements Plan The City Council hereby approves and adopts the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study Capital Improvements Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" for the Service Area shown in Exhibit itA". A copy of the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study Capital Improvements Plan shall be maintained at all times in the office of the City Secretary. 1 I I. I I I I I I I Ie 'I I I I I I I Ie I SECTION 3. Definitions When used in the ordinance, these terms shall be defined as follows: Capital Impact Fee: A charge in addition to water and wastewater connection charges made against the customer or property owner after June 19, 1990 to pay a proportionate share. of the total cost of wter and wastewater system improvements within the city. Capital Improvements Plan: The water and wastewater impact fee study capital improvements plan adopted by the City Council, as may be amended from time to time. Capital Pro Rata Fee: A charge in addition to water and wastewater connection charges made against the customer or property owner prior to June 19, 1990 to pay a proportionate share of the total cost of water and wastewater system improvements within the city. City: City of North Richland Hills, Texas Director: The Director of Public Works/Utilities for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas or his authorized representative. Land Use Assumptions: The land use assumptions adopted by the City Council upon which the capital impact fees are based. SECTION 4. Impact Fee Schedule A fee shall be charged against each lot or tract of land and the owner thereof whose water and/or wastewater line shall be connected with any water line and/or wastewater line in the city, and the fee shall be charged at the following rates based on the water meter size: Meter Size Equivalency Factor Water Wastewater Total - 5/8 x 3/4 inch or 3/4 inch 1.00 $ 725 $ 224 $ 949 1 inch 1.67 1,211 374 1,585 1-1/4 inch 2.77 2,008 620 2,628 1-1/2 inch 3.33 2,414 746 3,160 2 inch 5.33 3,864 1,194 5,058 3 inch 10.00 7,250 2,240 9,490 4 inch 16.67 12,086 3,734 15,820 6 inch 33.33 24,164 7,466 31,630 8 inch 60.00 43,500 13,440 56,940 10 inch 96.67 70,086 21,654 91,740 2 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I - I I SECTION 5. Increasing size of meter. If a customer requests an increase in meter size to an existing service, the customer shall pay the fee difference between the new level of service and the existing level of service as set out in Section 3 hereof. The additional fee shall be paid prior to the installation of the enlarged meter service. A request for additional sewer connections for improved property shall not result in the assessment of an additional Wastewater Impact Fee so long as no increase in the size of the water meter is made. SECTION 6. Payment of and accounting for capital impact fee. (1) The capital impact fee shall be fully paid in cash prior to the issuance of any building permit for the development and/or when application for water and/or sewer service is submitted to the City. (2) All capital impact fee funds collected shall be deposited in interest bearing accounts clearly identifying the category of capital improvements or facility expansions for which the impact fee was collected. Interest earned on the impact fees deposited is considered funds of the account on which it is earned and is subject to the same restrictions placed on use of impact fees. SECTION 7. Review of capital improvements plan. (1) The land use assumptions and capital improvements plan shall be updated at least every three years with the initial three-year period beginning on the day the capital improvements plan was adopted by the City Council. (2) The review, evaluation and update of the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan shall be done in accordance with Chapter 395, Texas Local Government Code. SECTION 8. Use of capital impact fees. (1) Impact fee funds may be spent only for the purposes for which the impact fee was imposed as shown by the capital improvements plan and as authorized by Section 8, paragraph (2). (2) All capital impact fees may be used to pay the costs of constructing capital improvements or facility expansions identified in the capital improvement plan, including: a. construction contract price; b. surveying and engineering fees; c. land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court award and costs, attorney·s fees, and expert witness fees; and d. fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the city. (3) All capital impact fees may be used for the payment of principal and interest on bonds, notes or other obligations issued by or on behalf of the city to finance the capital improvements or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan. 3 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I SECTION (1) In a. 9. Compliance with other regulations addition to the capital impact fees, each property owner shall: Construct or provide for the construction of all water and wastewater lines located within, contiguous or adjacent to their property necessary to satisfy the city's minimum specifications and requirements but that are not a part of the capital improvements plan for the city; and Pay all water and wastewater connection charges in accordance with applicable provisions of the City Code and all other rules and regulations of the city. b. SECTION 10. Refunds. (1) On the request of an owner of the property on which an impact fee has been paid, the city shall refund the impact fee if existing facilities are available and service is denied or the city has, after collecting the fee when service was not available, failed to commence construction within two years or service is not available within a reasonable period considering the type of capital improvement or facility expansion to be constructed, but in no event later than five years from the date of payment. (2) On completion of the capital improvements or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan, the city shall recalculate the impact fee using the actual costs of the capital improvements or facility expansion. If the impact fee calculated based on actual cost is less than the impact fee paid, the city shall refund the difference if the difference exceeds the impact fee paid by more than 10 percent. (3) The city shall refund any impact fee or part of it that is not spent as authorized by this Section 8 within 10 years after the date of payment. (4) Any refund shall bear interest calculated from the date of collection to the date of refund at the statutory rate as set forth in Article 1.03, Title 79, Revised Statutes (Article 5069-1.03, Vernon's Texas Civil statutes), or its successor statute. (S) All refunds shall be made to the record owner of the property at the time the refund is paid. However, if the impact fees were paid by another political subdivision or governmental entity, payment shall be made to the political subdivision or governmental entity. SECTION 11. Authority of political subdivisions to pay fee. Political subdivisions and other government entities are subject to the impact fees imposed under this ordinance. SECTION 12. Effect of this ordinance. (1) This ordinance is subject to amendment by the City Council pursuant to its governmental and legislative power and upon a finding and conclusion that the then current land use assumptions and actual development and construction of capital improvements or facility expansions reflect a change in the estimates and projections used to calculate the total projected number of service units and costs of capital improvements and resulting capital impact fees. (2) This payment and collection of the capital impact fees shall not obligate the city to provide any specific capital improvement unless approved by the City Council and shall not guarantee any specific level or quality of capital improvement or facility expansion. 4 I' I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I SECTION 13. Severability If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereto any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of the ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 14. Repealer All ordinances or any parts thereof in conflict with the terms of this ordinance shall be and hereby are deemed repealed and of no force or effect provided that such repeal shall be only to the extent of such inconsistency and in all other respects this ordinance shall be cumulative of other ordinances regulating and governing the subject matter covered in this ordinance. SECTION 15. Effective Date This ordinance shall be effective immediately from the date of passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS this day of , 1990. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney 5 I .' I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I - - EXHIBIT "A" "'- II. ~ '1 . 1 I \ ~; - t:::r:.,.- \ ElJRSEY I ~l ~ "8 t êIDl ~ -==r~ __ r- I~ 29 ~ I I rm . ~ - I--Y \Y'11r? E= _~'Q-I 1 -HD~ ËLr ~ ~ f\lì I-9i-cl . ~H-H A"- V~ 0 J r ~ EI ~ i [II 1<-r-tfi1f J\ ~...\\,~ ~ - __ ~1t ~ UGA \\ ~ I ~--i-.~0 r--"~- I h ïT1ilTP f\ ~ I IT ~ /,~ ~IL- ~ I _ LJr~ I~I ~ ~ lHmT:H RICHi:~D mT__ ~ I 111 J ~ - R l!t~~~ El@~/~ ~[T ~ i,~-~I~~f w fV ~ : _§tl ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ì ~ ~ _ ~ I ,H., 820 - ~ -E 10 n rj-,p ~ ~ J ~_ ~ ~ ~~ rTTlt1 ~I ~[fqY ::J j ~~¡::U¡~~~[ r~r öt1J- r ~ -/~ ~ ~;I~~JrTI~~~~~ J¿~~ Þm I / I ~ I t0 ') I'lJ'TIi F,-- ~~k:: ')- -rï:s!l~ ""~ ' TO 1¡l.~ a1 I ~ (~r-( ¿1' ~ ~I ~ == ~ ~~ '7 ~=::rH1 LLJ ft::~ IT f M T L~-- fJ-r- /=::: -I ill --- I ~ I- / I { I\.. GLEN EW V r (r1 ( t\\ ........,-~ ~~~ ~ 1 I I r 1A" I .., ~ ("'"' I I P" In J /\ \ ~ ~ ~ I -~ tT ' ~ I ~ n. \ - ~ V --~~ I C I [lj }....~- VJ -r ~11 {1F ~ _~ ~i-- ~ _r:::l - '-1~ J1J Ii I 7 A,.rç I -.;;; ,Cl.. '-~~- P:: 1 _ r -I ~ ~~=-'..- I &~~--l ~ ~~p:: ~I íiï 1 -__ IL~ (~~( - 1 - ~ 1;IJf/ 1 iJ S r I - I ffiYf]- I (-LLI I r '·Lt-... . , ., ftW' ,... J:.~I~7V~~ ~~~~:I ~ I 1 SERVICE AREA lrh IV 1\( ( \ I I-- I.......- Iv -II- - I' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Economi c Deve 1 opment ~ Funding for Resprigging of Bermuda Grass - ~ubject: Iron Horse Golf Course Council Meeting Date: 6/11/90 Agenda Number: GN 90-89 The severe freezing weather in December 1989 damaged golf course bermuda grasses throughout Texas. Unfortunately, Iron Horse was one of those courses. The assessment of the bermuda grass at Iron Horse finds that: 1. There is no bermuda on any of the 18 tee boxes. 2. There is no bermuda on holes 12 thru 17 all of which are located on the north side of IH-820. ~ 3. There are varying degrees of bermuda, none of which is substantial enough to stand on its own, on the 12 holes sooth of IH-820 on the driving range. 4. There is no "tiff dwarf bermuda grass" on any of the 18 greens. Because of the above it is necessary to resprig 419 bermuda grass on the fairways, driving range and tee boxes. Dwarf tiff bermuda grass (328 bermuda) will be sprigged on all greens at Iron Horse. ~ . The Golf Ad Hoc Committee, City Staff and Recreational Services, Ltd. are proposing that ~e course be closed June 18, 1990 to undertake the necessary work. The projected time 'Wfable is: June 18 Close Course June 20 thru July 5 Thru August 16 Resprig all tee boxes, the driving range, all 18 greens, and all 18 holes as required. Maintain the new grasses and allow them to mat~re. At some time between August 16 and September 1 Open the course at the time that RSL would deem the grasses ready for play. I ~ I Finance Review ~ Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available egr:~~ting Budget ~ ,FlnanceDlrector V~~d City ~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 2 $;fit'..- ~.' · ~Ñ~~~,,"·~,}.·\¡i':~~:;U~';.~·';;7.;J:..\~,:w':~ ':~ì!~:~;;';'" I~ I . I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I I ~ >; :"--"~~_'::":;~~ã: "r',:~~~~$·;· ú~'~,~ ,.~, });;~~~:-4:.~~~-.;~':J.. ,t.~>:.....,; Page Two The financial impact of this work will require $400,000. Staff recommends the issuance of Certificates of Obligation to fund this debt. A breakdown of the associated costs includes: ITEM COST $ 55,250 22,200 6,760 8,500 6,450 142,212 90,159 23,000 31,147 14,322 $400,000 Grass Planting - Fairways and Tees Grass Planting - Greens Grass Planting - Roughs Grass Planting - Driving Range Sodding - Green and Bunker Surrounds Maintenance Costs through August 31st Operational Costs through August 31st Bond Issuance Cost Year One Debt Service Contingency (8.49%) TOTAL Recommendation: It is the recommendation of the Golf Ad Hoc Committee, City Staff and Recreational Services, Ltd. that resprigging of Iron Horse Golf Course be approved and funded through the issuance of $400,000 in Certificates of Obligation. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I . I I I I I I I r I ) :J] C 00 RSLJ~tb )0 ~OO ')0°0 )00 -, A Golf Course Management Company 3012 Fairmount Dallas, Texas 75201 214/740-0114 I ~ I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I , I A PROPOSAL FOR THE REPLANTING OF IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE Submitted by Recreational Services, Ltd. June 7, 1990 I l- I I I I I I I It I I I I I I I , I MEMORANDUM TO: North Richland Hills City Council Members FROM: Martin J. Streiff DATE: June 6, 1990 SUBJECT: Iron Horse Golf Course Replanting Plan Last week we submitted to you, through the City Staff, a proposal for the closing of Iron Horse Golf Course for the replantin~ of the bermuda grass lost due to winter kill. This decision has been very carefully consIdered, deliberated, and researched extensively. It is certainly regretful, but absolutely necessary. If it is any consolation, we are not the only Texas golf course in this predicament. As reported at the recent North Texas Golf Course Superintendent's Association meeting that was held at Iron Horse last week, 191 Texas courses reported significant bermuda grass loss as far south as Houston. Diamond Oaks Country Club, as one example, lost all their bermuda greens and will be closed effective June 11th. On the bright side, Iron Horse Golf Course is· the product we envisioned and has considerably surpassed the expectations of the public from all reviews. Together, we have developed a new benchmark for municipal golf and we ain't done yet! Wait until the clubhouse opens with the Grand Opening in September! The overseeding of the golf course last October has proven to have been the right decision for the following reasons: 1. It allowed us to open in the prime golf season, with a good marketing plan, allowing most metroplex golfers to learn early of Iron Horse. The two month early opening resulted in approximately $120,000 in additional net revenue with the cost of overseeding at only $50,000. It gave us a brief history on the number of rounds and revenues to be compare against our initial projections and base future forecasting. For example, April's net budgeted revenues were $25,000, but actual was $65,000, and that was with a lot of rain. 2. 3. Therefore, with the very favorable response to the course resulting in greater net revenues, we feel comfortable that the course can service the additional debt now required for the replanting of the grass. Enclosed is the following information we have used to support our recommendation. 1. A revised 1990 Budget on the golf course operations which assumes a course closing . of June 18th to August 31st, 1990, with no activity. We would be retaining all maintenance personnel to complete some of the grass work as well as maintaining the remainder of the course. We would also maintain a skeleton crew of key personnel to assist the maintenance crew, to support course operations and to aid in the openin~ of the clubhouse, expected by early July. All operational costs for the closing penod are reflected in the replantIng I l- I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I r I 2. 3. A Preliminary 1991 Operating Budget. A 1990 and 1991, month by month, debt service schedule that lists all obligations relative to the course, including the assumed additional debt of $400,000 for the grass replanting and projected course debt revenues. A detail of the $400,000 Proposed expenditures for the grass replanting, course maturation and operationa expenses, bond issuance and a contigency You will see there are some changes from the proposal submitted last week They are: 4. A. Based on the extremely high level of play we have been experiencin~ and foreseeing this level continuing, we have changed our position to retam the bentgrass greens, but to plant bermuda grass as originally planned. We are experiencing an average of 240 players daily and know that maintaining quality bentgrass at this level would be difficult and expensive, Maintaining the bentgrass on the greens would necessitate us to reduce the daily play level through tee time scheduling. To maintain our net profit level in order to meet debt service, we would need to raise fees to offset the lower play level. Bermuda greens are less expensive to maintain, thus realizing higher net revenues toward our debt obligations. Planting bermuda greens can be accomplished for the same or less money than initially planned for retaining the bentgrass greens because we can reduce the number of square yards of bermuda sod initially planned, as well as the deletion of the sand required on the golf course. Please compare the enclosed "Replanting Construction Budget" to that which we previously submitted. B. We have obtained written bids on the replanting that we did not have when our first proposal was submitted. We so stated this in our original proposal and assumed the higher bid phone quotes in all cases for our estimates. You will see in our revised plan that much lower prices have been secured, thus reducing our construction price. 5. A ten year debt service schedule with projected course debt revenues and again assuming a $400,000 additional debt for the course replanting. There is a great deal of information presented in this proposal and I will be available for questioning at the June 11 th Council meeting. Hopefully, we have gained your confidence over the past eighteen months and have worked very closely with the City Staff and ad hoc Committee on these recommendations. Thank: you for allowing us the opportunity to serve you. I l- I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I , I SECTION ONE: SECTION TWO: SECTION THREE: SECTION FOUR: SECTION FIVE: TABLE OF CONTENTS Revised 1990 Budget Preliminary 1991 Operating Budget 1990/1991 Debt Service Schedule Replanting Construction Bu.dget Ten Year Debt Service Schedule I l- I I I I I I I It I I I I I I I , I ~.$ B~ u ~~ ~ã ~~ ;sÆ ~~ .sa ~ , c: :::I .., ~ Ii ..... -= :> .... ... ., ~ .,. Q ~~ ii~ ~~ ::J __ ~ i~ ~., i>- ~~ ~g ~~ i~ ii~ >- i! ~~ l&.. ~ ëi"- b~ t- II") an r- ~ ('\J ~~!~~! If ~ f ~~C\lMru_ ~J I 1 I I ~$~Z~:lr~1 <D:I;;D"""'~I;{ ~~~ --I I I I ~!!I!I:!f :f~<ú~<ú~I-:i1 5~Æ~~~ I ~its_1 a-.DO"'<\J..or-Jè!I a3r-:,..,r';M'cúl -N , 1 I , , !~!~~If~, nf~':"';MI~1 ~i ~~ ! cú ~i -:::) :> ~~ ~ f\J ~i :::J t- ~~ an r- eg M ~i ~t- ~ Z ..0 ,..,j s SSscgsea s ieDSSSeD& ~ ....0 Ñ ~~~~II: ------1 1I"J..o-"-M_1 -OJ I f ~ ~~~~~~f~l CO'-OII')CDIOMI~I (\J. ... _ ...._ I I !~~~~I'~' cñM'oÕ~.;~I" ,'\J .... C7'> I SeDS_SSlI_, I 1 f I I I v1 ~ ,..... .. CIa - sss___ S) S) ---_5_ ,- .. .. - - ~..¡.. - - c .- c ._ ;!~;!~ --........- .. .. c: c: .. .. .. .. .. .. - u.. l&.. - _ u.. .. ..,. .. C:C:C:CC:u.. .. .. s.. ... .. .. .. ~ =- .. c s.. s.. 0 0 ... .. (!)c.ø..........c.ø.. .,. c.. :~.:~..:.::t.D .... 0 0 0 0 ._ I- !c.n c x: 3: :z: :x: :: ~ ..COGDCOCO.... ..----.......... S- IX CD - .. .. u.. c: : ... C.D - ~ Þ- eD I I sa 1 I I , ~ . 1 I <»:3 ~- ,q--: ;~ - ~ . M -- -- -- - - .... .... ... ... '- ¿! .... .::¿]....~ .....c: - - CII I.. c: 0 ._ 0 .. x - ._ I.. ._ C co s .. .... - Þ- UI L .. U ;:~eD ... - Q)"v) ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ - ,..... èÜ $ In .... ,..... Q) Q) ..r (\J . - s s ~~ ,..... ..0 ~ In ~, I - I I ~ I I I ~I ~ï I ~ J ¡ ~ I - I / I - CIÞ .. - - LA.. ... .... l! ~ o ..... ~I ~I ~I II"J~CIÞ_~ r- ,..... ... CIÞ ~añc6 ~I ~ - ~I I ~f ~I I J ~~. .. ... - .~ oj Z6n~ <\J~Vi ~ OJ Z' ~I - , ÑI f ~~~ r- r- ..0 ~ M ~I ~I Z~~ ..oQ)~ ~ ..;- _, I I I - -- ., t . I f s S. I(') r- In r- ..- ,..... ~ ,..... Ø'O ,..,- M ~~~ ,.:...:,..: f"O)f"O)li) ;:Ñ~ .ñ'-:cJ sa a_ - -- a as ... .. - ~ .. .. .. ,. S So. ~ .:: ë åì! _ "; .. "V - a.. a.. >Cl..a.,.. -.. CUI.. ec fi :.. .; =õ .0 L I.. .c .- c: ::II :: ~ õ c!i .~ U Õ I ~ I ~ : ::1 I I ßI ,...rl -I reI !f , 51 ¡ J ~ , I I ~ I I ~ I I - I I CIÞ CIÞ .. =' ~ : a: ~ .c: Õ "3 o ÞOO- ~æ~~~~~i~(tþegSS ~-4~cxiM:iM~~ ~~~~~~an~~ N...r-r-Mr-?ea-~ ; ..: - - ÆØ',....~!::2~,........V) - ~. ::: ~ ¡::.s V') ,q ~ ~ ~ Ñ "':"';Ñ ~!!tV4~-~;:;~~ -èOlf')-':IC:04"(\Jr- ~ Ñ-- ...: .cŸ ~I r-_ I ~I .g!~~~~1~~ ÑØ'Oø:'ÞMì},_ì1Ií~<\.I ,..: oj": c-ü ..r,,; CIÞ-tW-ssSlsaa s, I I I I I _&S_S_<»csas .."O~-COø:'Þ_~~ ~r::=Ñ~~õ1MOJ~ cJ Ñ ":,..,joj -..ru~~Mr-<\.IW'J g:~~~,.....~;!({3W') ,...r...:.-: Ñ ..Þ'. ~f5~~~~~~Ri rwr...:,."...: Ñ .ñ'; -as.ClÞClÞSSCIÞ --s-_a_SI,. CIÞ-ClÞGD_aa_CIÞ .. .. .. - .. =.:~ ~=;¡ciJ= > - .. QI ~cZ-g :r~ os... -"Vu...> ClIO >...._ _.. S!~"2::aQ,:~..~~~ .. :-a::'c: ~~~..:.: s..U) Otë >- .; t ~ ".E g t'" :; ~ ~ ci .~.~ ~ :; - :!. é1 c: "V::II.. C "0.. _ .... ..-~-c:CTCCa.C....CI.. "g~&:~«~::j:;c:1~~c:J~J¡ o "'- ... .. ~ = .. ~,r- ~, ~ ~iMi -I~ I 1 (j:~: ~-I -: I :::I~I I i il~: - I _, ~J~: I I I I I I I ,..... I _ I It ~: ~ I ~i~t , , I I : I~,r-I J Q) 1 ~ , I ,.;1 ,..: : ru ,..." I f I"': , I 1511. I ¡ , 1 1 . I : I I a t s I I t 1 , , <101 a- I ...,. . M , ..0 r-.. I ~ ~! I I I I ¡ ...0 I ~ t v") t ...D ~: ''\J r-, - t I , I CSÞ ~ a- I r- I N , - ,.., 1 ~' ,.; (\J I 1 I f 4SÞ 1 S t t . 1 J 1 1 I SlI <Sa 1 t t I I I CIÞ a - =' c: .. > . ex .. CII ,. ~ :> .. CD .. .. :::I æ a:: "V g u.. ... ~ o L Co:) ~ o ÞOO- ~ ~ I l- I ~ i?iÞ- I ê~ at: I i~ a;:)~ ex ~~ I ~:> ~ Þ- 0:: ~~ I ciÞ- ~ Q: i~ I ~Þ- ~ Þ- Þ- I !~ Þ- ~; It æ-' lMs 0:: ~ i~ ð~ I (J ~.., ~.~ 0::: ~a ~>- 0:: ~~ I ~Æ ~~ -~ Þ- gg I ~~ Þ- ~~ I ~~ >- Þ- ex ~~ I ið~ La... ~ cr- . Þ- >- C ~ex =' .., ~i I * -, -: I > .. L .. .. .. Q , I ~ðD"'~_~"II1"I(')r-tSÞ ~ I ~ , ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~·~~Æ~~~ ~ ;...~ ~~~V;~ I I ~I ~I co co - a-r-,.,.,-.D.... co (\J If) ~ ~Mw-ï...-cÜor ~~ RfcÕ""- ~~ - -- --,...,-~ ~ a- , -.D - - , r- I I I , I ~5)~~~~~~:g~:¡S ~ ~ I 3~~ ~~sa~~!S~~~~ß~I~ ~ I (\J M ..D ...: - I M(~Ñ c:Õ cÜ ,.,; ,..., , ...0 1 I I ~~i~~~~~g;~~eD ~ ~ I ~~~ ~g;.~~'eDæz~!!~~I~ <:0 , If'1 a" I ....cr-_ OJ_ OJ I/') (\J ,..: -- -:- :f - I M"t:ÜcJ as" cÜ :f -.D I r- I ~s~~~~~~!~¡S s I s 3~~ ~ g; s.~ ~ ! ~.~ z )Q ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ co ~J ~ (\J ,.,., .~ - - C\J1f'1 ~ ,..: cJ -- ~ "';-Ñcü oÖ -- ~ - SÞCSÞ.i;I-D:::JCO-...D(8r-_ ~ I ~~~ ~g;.~~3~!Z~~~e1~·~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~r-M~~r-~ ~J C\JCQI"") ...~- .... - C\J C\J cÕ cJ - I ,..,ft:ÜÑ cD ..: -: .; - - ,..... I ~ I - I I I I J I I SSS&SSS4SÞCSÞSÞss SÞ I eD S S S SSSSSCSliSSIISSSS5SÞ5 SÞ I I I , I I sssS'SSS_c:85S S S S sa _ SSc:8c:8SÞSÞSSSc:8SS5SS SÞ ::3SI(').......øa--CO~t"'J~,..."s r-·::::~:Þ~~M~_~ Ñ __ !:lSÞ...ø_....c:a~_r-(\,I...._ f'5 !;;::!?~~Wi~~~~ &ñ -: -- cJ..: ~-~~~~:;:~~!:l<'\l- - ~r-I:~...in_~~ .; ..: ..: cü": SÞ_-SS_SS__ss SSCSiÞSÞ-GÞ_CIIICIIIS_S S----_S____S ;2 o en .. ... .. - CII at .. ,. I. ... ... ... So. .. "'0 "'O~_> .. o 00>_ "'0 ~ =.~ ~ ~ .: CIQ ~ ~ ~ v ~.o"Q c:;.. c:: I.c.a CI C _ _ _ ._ ~ _ .. ~ ,., a: So. at ... .. ._ I. "'0.. C -:: ti ..0 3..": ~ CI 4; ~ .. : CIQ :; os..:I_U::II ccrcco.c U .. - S- ... 0 _ =- ._ ._ ,. ,.._ :X(..Jo..o..LL.CX(/)-I::aUt-~ -' ~Iif ":':if I , I , I I I I Z&n~ ..o~...o - - ~,~, £!:[I I _ I I I ~~~ McJcJ ~r~r ~ I M ~ -, - I ~I~, I - I , I Z~1!! (\Iëål"") ,..,fcJcü CII CII SSS S S S_. - - s CII _ ~ o en .. '0 ¡ ~ o - ... c: .. .. ~ 00-= UI ~ I. .. a.a.,. a. 0 o S- -a .. a. ój;- : UII ~ -.-Q.:ccxcn ë; c.a - ... o U .. ~ o S- a. ~ Þ- .. .. o ... CD ~~-~~!-!~~CO~~~~ M t6g;Z~~~5ZZJ!?~~ßl~~ .....~- ~- <\.IWiì15 ~ ~:;~~~~~.z~~~~.~ ~a-(\j -(\1- C\l1t")~ r:Õ C8cs.Sscs.S(DSSS__s_ea SC8S----SSeaSSSe8S --S---_5SSSSÞSClÞe8 .. " .. c C >0. ,... = I... ~ : 00" c: ~ ~ ;.~ ~:. ~ "o_=,_ cn..~..o _ ......c::-cu..cx ... ca ,., > _ .. 0.. x . - .. c::.... _ co... . _ _ ,.,s...I." --..c::s.._cn - þo-' 0 a.._ '0 .. _ .... ....._,. ~ "- ..- t.. o.c u.c:.-.x__ .. a:: ~ a.._ 0 0.._ ... .. ,. t.. ._ _ ~~:5$-=~&Æ~Êc1~~=:;¿ .. U _ c: U ... c: .. c ,... >--- - c: t...... _ U -oo4oÞC_c cc:_c:.. ~ 3~~~~ ~ = ':;: -::; .. at"f i v-) ..:: ~ ... Ñ ..: co o.J ...0 ~ CSÞ S . .. ..,. ; a. . ;IC L.IJ a. Æ - o c.o -;; .. o t- I l- I I I I I I I It I I I I I I I , I ~cP §~ u..": g~ ~~ ~~ ~ffi -~ ~i ~~ ~i ~'> ~ ~~ ~t- ~ ~i ~..... tM i~ i~ ~.., i~ ~.., ~>- ~~ ~g ~~ i~ ii~ >- .... a:: ~~ iif9 LL ., a- I c: ;: .., tI to- >- ~QC ã11 ..., -= ~ So. .. - ,. Q ~ a!...... b~ ..... ~:::::~~~~~ ~r--'llrM~_MM .£ J N~~~$KJ~~ ~~::J~S~~~ ~~::~I~~~ ....: I=~~S~~~ ....: e8CSÞC!8e&ÞSSsa eDSÞSÞeDsasss ~~~:Ms~~~ t- ~~~~I~~~ ..: ..: ~~~~S1'J~~ -: eD<8SSÞSSSÞsþ C»SÞSe&ÞS$SÞ5 55&5SÞ_&_ .. - ~ Q, )C L.t.I .. (, C ... So. ;: ~ - .. .~- : ~ .. : -U~-c: - .. "" - ... .. .- ...-x--.__O s.. - ... So. s.. CQ _ __ .. 0 _ ._.._ .. _ ... 8' ~CIC of:t~ ~ 8:_ ......... 0.. O--:::J. ~Q.a.:aCII:CDX(J)UJ ~ ~ .... Z a- ~ ~~-~~~~~~I!~ri5i' æ"',.; :;f ~.:.:I'£I I I .n a- t- ~::'»~a~~..s:.Klit.~ r-N ¡¡t5__ ~_~..._ I ~ I ¡ ..:- I f I ¡ ¡ I, I~ I I ..: .ñ ..: In <T" t- :}~"~!~:M~~I!~ oJ" wi" ...: Z Ñ &i')r-SÞ~.:tJ~~KJ~~~ ~~ ~-- ~-~~?Ü ~ cr- ~ II'f -=- - ~ ~~&~!~~~~~s~ ";f ø:1 ::1 ~ ~I I I ~I ,..- I ~ I ...: M Iff ..: elf ClaeDSeD_S___SStSÞ S SÞ&SSÞeDSSS$SSeIÞ ~I - I - I I I I I I ""'1SSe&Þ<S!,..".,.,MMIS"" ...... 1I')V)"'OC'\.l.......o ~ eDN N ...0 Ñ C\Ï ..: I ... I cro I - I <uj I ~!Jt-.zrJ~"'O~I-~:~1 ~~ ì1§-_ ~- _ Nfa:1 ... .., N N I - I ~~~~!~~~~!~~I~I I- I ~~~~"~~~~~··~I I I ..~..~......~..~~~~I ......~............~·I~ I I ~, cro I - I - I r I I - eD - .. .. ~ CL. )( L.t.I .. .- ¡ - Lt.I - c: .~ - . ~ CL. (:) - .. .. : .: ~ ~.. = )I( .... \AI · .::.¡: : CL - -s..... _ _. : .. =~~ GI-~~e3 ~ - :. : ":;; -= = >-..: -;; -ü _ _ s.. - .. -.J s... "" '.- L _ ._ III: L 2. ~ - ~ .;; : ëi --g ~ - 1; a...: - >-CIC s.. a.. s... Q.:J _ _ U 0 L ~~~c1=t=~~8-~&1ik:l ~ - CJ c: .. L ~ ~ .. IC: - . .. s.. !- Q - 01 ~ ~ ~ o t- I l- I ~ i?J...... I b~ ..... cc I !I ex ~~ I ~::> S! ..... or: ~~ I æ..... ~ OIl: .....~ ~ I ~..... ~ ..... Þ- I !~ ..... It ~~ ~..... ~$ ..... . ex: Q"O ~~ §~ I ~~ ~..... a:: ~~ ..... 0::: 8>- ~~ I ~i ii~ Þ- ~g I ~8! Þ- I !i >- i! I iif3 LL. s Q"O Þ- >- . c:: šar: =' ~ ii! I t ~ ~ "0 : I > - L. .. - ... r Q I ~.~~ ~~~Z~$~~~-~~~~~~~~I~I ~~$ $~~Q"O~ ~~~ ~-~N~M~·'Q"OI ~~~ ~.Ñ ~ ~ ~ I~ -- ~I SI"'21::~~~~ ìñ~i;I§...........~Xj_ oJM" f..õ f I ~j;Zfj;~-·~ ~.......... "O.......~Ñ_ \'Û ~ : ~ I ~~zr"'S!t~~~ ~..oc7'I~CO:::Ñ_ oJ~ ,,..: I I ~!!I~*~!~ I (!þCSÞSÞIS~SÞt'lPSÞ , f I ssslscsat'IPs_ I I I ~!~r·!~!~m~~~ I ~ I /.; I -I I I ~.~-z~.~~~~~I..o --N -~- ~ _/;1 ~z~SÞz~z~~~~~:""", --N _~_ _ _I~ - - - - r I ~z~-Æ~·~..o~~~'~l --N -~- Kì _ a:J -: I :: -~t'IP__st~ste8e8__,_, I I ........................,.., I ~Z~I~~Z.~ ~.~~-~~~~.~~~ N~~I~Kì _ _ ~ ... ..: I Ñ I I ~ f ~I , I f ~ I . C7' I I ~'~f~~~-~ ~!~-!~!~;~~ - - -. .. ...:: N__I~ ~s~I~~__~ __~_____~~~ ~~-:I~II'J~ - in N~~ ~ ~ I I f ,~ i~ ......,......................-........-.. .. . ....-,..-....-......---------- .., e8~-,~~___st____________ _ . .. ~ a.. x UJ - c : .. L. ~ !- :: i ~~ Lex -- L.... >--->- _O~__ CIQ L ... ._ L ~C::""::t .. ... .. .... 0 Q.a:CXX '1:1 o CI L&. - .... c:: .. a. JC uJ - a. .. Q .. U _ c:: ~ 4 4 L. .. L ~~ ~~~ ! .. æ - -~~m~~ ~_ ~ = ~ ~ i~i~3~ !! ..i~~ : ~-Uc:: ..~~ oc::.. _~ Q ~:_-:~:~-=:~~~=~~~ ~ -~~~~-~&~~=L~~~:~~ ... oX - - z::. --- .- ë!.. .. a. .. u ._ ~... ._ -;; ~~~~!5§~~~11~~~ã~! ~ I l- I ~ <i~ b~ 10- I a:: i~ ïð~ I a:: ~~ ~=> ~ I ..... 0:: ~~ ~Io- ~ I a:: iÆ ~Þ- I fM ~ t-- !! I t-- ~~ à-" It ~$ ~ 0::: é1"t 8~ 8~ ~~ ~-.. I ex ~~ t-- ~~ ~>- ~~ à~ I t-- ~g ~~ I t-- ~~ ii~ I >- ..... a:: Ii u.. I $ a- t-- >- I c: II =' .., I ~ .., I -= ~ S0- I ... - .. Q r I ~~Si~S~~~!~~~~II~~f~~~~II~~~~~~~I~1 ~~ ~~ ~~~ÑÑ~~~Ñ~~~~ ~Ñ £¿M~ I~ ~~S~~SI!~~S~~SSSS!!!~~S~~f!S~~~!I~1 NN - - -- N_ i~ I I !~S~~SI!I~SI~S&SS!!!~~~'I!!S~~S!I~I ~Ñ ~ ~ Ñ~ Ñ~ I~I ~~S~~SIII~&II__I_!!!~~ 'I~!&~~_! ~' .. I M I ..-, I , ~~-~~-I!!~-!!!!-!!!!~~~~!~f&~~S! ~I N ~ , ~Ñ OJ ..: ~ ~cŸ .;- ÑcÜ ssa~~~S~5SS$.S__S~__5.____5SS___ -.-~--.SS-S·_--__._______S_S_._~ ~!-~!-!'~!~l~~--~!!~~~S'I~~-~~_~ ...: - - Ñ-:" Z--~~-~~I~I~I·---·Z·~~~~I~._~~_. ~~ ~M ~~ M ~ ~ Ñ~-~M ~ ...~~ _ ~M ..: OJ ..: ....: -:"ÑM'''': ;Ñ ~~-~~SII~~~~~--~-!!!~~-~~~f_~~_!I,~ -OJ -- - -NM N "'N ~ N i~1 ------------.s--____S___________,_ I -------------------------_S_____ _ -------------S_S________________,_ : c ... ~ L&J - '; ~ t ... 3. ~ ... t ~ ; ... ~ r... ~ ~ ... ~ ~: o -. -L -. C . ~ _ _ ~ ~ a~~!~_¡æ _ = = ~_ ~=) ~ C Q. '- .a CI: ... - - 0 11.5 8: -J:I h ::: _ oc: l - .3 ~ ~ g : ~: !!-. ~ _ ~ -g Ai ,i! .; ~ -: ~ _.g g:"E .:i_ - - - ... .- c '" c - ... - U) en ~ 0 c-. ... _... U ._ en en .: :: = ~ .I: ~ -; = ;: = "0 ::: ~ .. .... r.!; - .!; .: ~ = ï: ~ 0 .. ... :;. _ -;; ;1 t:; ~ -E ~ ~ .~.; ~.;- g i -= ~ "2 : i:: :;; : ¡~ 11 ~ ~ ~: :: ~ ~ æ ~ :~~g~~~!~~~~~Õ~~~~~~Ü~5X~w~~Ó~x~~ S0- =' o U i I I I f ,- I I ,. f f I f M , ¡;I -. co I Nt I , ~: ":.1 ¡M' I I I I - .. c ., a. x L&J - a. ... Q - c: ¡ - .,. '- ::I o U .. .... o ... I l- I ~ i!!Î."- b~ I t- oe >-~ I !~ Q: )-~ !~ I ~ )- Q: ~. ~ ~~ I H DC i~ I ~~ )- )- I !! t- II !~ ~GÞ t- o:: <r- ~.~ §~ I ~~ ii'" ex ~~ t- o:: ~>- ~.~ I ~~ ii~ ..-. ~g I ~a l- I Ii >- i! I iiel LA.. ~ C6't t II c :::I -» I I ~ -. -õ : > I - '- - .. .. Q , I ·~~~~~Z~~Æ.~M_~-. ~ ~~~M~~~M~_~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "":c\i ...: ~ !!~~~~~~·~~~~~·!-~I~ ~ ~ l!~~~~~~~S~~~~!_~I'~ ~ - ~ !!~~~~~I~S~~~.!_~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l!~~~~~~~.!~~-!-~,~ ~ - ~ ~~~--------------'-I ~-~--~----------- -I t ~~~~~~~~~-Æ~~-~--'~I - ~ ~. -N I~I l!~~~~~~~-!~--!--,~ ~ ~ = ~!~~~~!~~!!~--!--I~ n ~ ~ -----------------/-1 -----------------/-, -----------------/-, : c .. a.. -= UJ .. ... ¡ . w ... '" .. t g ... ~ E== ¡Ei! _! i "co ~..... .. > '-:::I~... --co ~ . . L ~ -:: 8· -:; : ... .~ ~ .- A:.j:; ~ _ -.- _ eX _ c; .:: -; ..... ~ ã.. .; ~ ~ : :;: :.. .2 -;;.: 0 ~ QCX~-~_~c~~ ~>c:o.... ~--~~~~~~~~ ~~~o:~ ~ -~~~~~i!~6-~i:~~œ~ - - .. U ;- .... .... .. oX - > .. ~ ~ "'- "5 _ ~ -a..a..c_"'--..>c...._u..o..~ _ ~~~~~~~~a~6~~~~~~4 ~ c .. CD -~~- ~ ~ ~ ..:~ .- - N ..0 SÞ~~. ~I~ - ~ ~I¡ ~I~f ~I~I ..: ~~~- ..: SÞ~~S -~~. ~ ~ ..: ~ ---- -,- ---- - -I I -~~- ~I~' -~~-I~I~I -~.- aIIl~ -.ì1S' ~ co - ~ C6't ----I-Ie' ---- -Ie, ---- -Ie, ... : = ~ c: s.. .. .. a.. Õ = - .. .. ... ... ... II: .. --t::- -= Q. - .. ~ = cp ~ ""2 .~g' .. -- ~ - f-~==-: L&.. ~ .. - L s.. ... .. óg.~~~ ~ 8- "'O&!:.!;~ ~ : ~ \Z ~ ~ I ~ -, ;j¡'~ ~ - _,N - II f ø ~I~I~I C\J I ru-H -, - !:!ft , H $ 's I ~ = J ~" I I ~ I ~ /-1/ ~ I I n -,- ~I f I -,- -, -1"""'1 I / " , Š - I · : a a J !.; ! I M i -'·'~I I I ~ · I I I -/- ¡, .. I · J - I I I , .../-,-, -I-Ie, ~ > o .. ::I è: .. : oc ... - - .- It- _ )Ie .... .. c: ..... .. at _ .5 ~ .. .... c: . o .0 U :::. -o~ .... L _ to ,.... .. a- : :.~~ ~ ~ =~ :;!.5 c o U .... - z I '- I I I I I I I ~= I ~. ~ ~& a:: _ §!:: ~- I I I I I I r I ;;; t!l ex - ....ffiPt o >- .... r- i!~ .~ ~ ii~ ~::> ~ CD ~ !æ~ ~ N ....~(Ü ~l5" ml- tt4 r- !Š~ to- ¡ ~~..D ii~ & !~:r t:J"a S .... ~ ~>-.ñ m~ ~ M .... I(') ~ -' - å!S-tn iiã ~ i~~ ii~ ... >- CO .... a: ~ 8~cJ ã:f5 La.. & cr- I c =' .., I r- GiÞ ...... an !I:T .., ~ ..J \It III .;: ~ U) -;; c o .... :: s. ~ a::: -~(t::l~~I~ ~iñ~NM.,,,, .. ~""........I .. ~~:i~::J~ie 1..:- I i~~§ji¡1 ------1 ~(ft----, I I ~~l~I!1 ------1 ~&jMNNNI I I I , SNM~(UØ-I ~~~ø:ëü~, ------, Ñ~...........MI , I I , NN.,þ-...... 1(')' ~g;~~;:iñ I ~_I -......... .., K)~~..........M:~. . , I I I I I I ~~:J:~~~I~: 1(')...èJ'~~I(')IÑI ............1.... ;;;~.,þ...~M II ¡; I - I I I I $æ~~~~IJi;! ------'æ-I M~S...r_.... I MII'1- I 1 _ . I . I I Ig;~m¡~,~i ~":-M";"':.I_: .,þ I ~ I ! i ~~~~:;:ö11()1 ~Cì!.~~~~I~1 ~:;J.,þ~..øMI~1 I - i I I ~~i~26~,~1 ------1 _I :.::Jiña-r-I(')MI~I 1 _ I 1 I , I I . -.þ S .,þ W"J ,.., t:J"a I co ~~~(ft~I:I~ cÕM"cÕ...õ.,.,rIM" N ... I tr't I , ~~¡~I!!~ ~f5M"cJcJÑf,r I ! i;:~~¡! ... ... ... .... ~ .... ~-.o---_ - ('\I OIl _ -. - ~:~: c·- c .- ~&~k '" - ..... ... '" OIl OIl c: c: .. .. .. .. .. OIl '" u.La..-_u... .... .. c: c: c: C c: LI- .. OIl 1. 1. OIl OIl .. =' =' OIl C 1. s.. a as... (D CD .... .... CD . - So. ,........t!) ~-----..... ...... a a a 0·_ So. tn :CX:Z:X-U) o C ._ ..... ~"COCOCOCO:KS- .. - - - - ..... .., S- a:: (.!) '" .. .. LA.. ~ .. So. c.D ~ :Õ~& r- an ,;-: r- - M -.0 I - I M . -, ~ , ... , . , , I N M ~g:¡ ~ co I .,þ I tr't I - , ~I I I . , - It') ~~ Ñ !! ~J , , , ~~ r_ CO ~ (\J M .... tI~ yJ-=- ~a- CO~ ,q-..:- ~g; ... -.0 Ñ":- ... ¡; M"": ... ~a- a-~ ... co r0- O' t:J"a CO & ~..:- ~~ a- ~. M" M - II') ~~ Ñ oS;) ;;; ; .. N M ~gJ ~ .. .. .... ... S- "" so...... .. u So. '" U .. - ...U ..-.c .... - C2t S- c: a -_ a .. X - .- S- - c: CO :K .. .... - ..... U1 ~ I I I :i I - I ~, i I . M ~ ::s~~eDeD - - r- ~-If') ~I ..0 I - I CO I -I , 1 , ......~..... ~...~ _ cü ~: CO I I - 1 N t I 1 1 1 .. It') ... ,..., ..0 CO tr't ... a- _ Ñ M 1 ~I -I ¥Jr 1 1 1 ~~~ If] r- M ~ .. N (p ... ~~~ -£ añ 0:1 - , -I 1:;1 I 1 ~~:i iiitr'tr- !f ,.: W"J ~ 9!r-ce N~- . .... ~..:-; ..... ..0 N .ñ' ... ~~~ M"M ;..:; ~ ,.,r ... ;~~ ¿..:-¿ If') 0' ~ ~ co M ..... - - ..0 a- (\j r- "';":-CÜ M If] CO .; M ~~~ añ":-Ñ ~ CO ~I~ ,.,r..:..:- Ñ ~ ~ ~ ~IRi M -- --- .. .. ..... - .. - en ~ .. .. .. c: ~ =' '" .... III ._ c: .- c: a:: _ .. .. "'CI" a. a. > c: s.. ell" .. ..,. c: (J S- a:: ..c s. ._ ._ (J .. > '"0 .a S- s. ..c .- c ~ ~::ê)6~u ö .. ... S- III U ~ ..... .-. &ñ" - :3 : : a:: ~ .c Õ .. .... a ~ ...0 .. a- ,; ~ ..-.oco~....._an-.o~&&&& COo'- .......,.... a-co... COanN~ eãMM"~":..D"':..D..D .....-...- N ...0... ~I -I M I - 1 1 t t 1 ~~~i~~~~! . Ñ __ M t ~: - , ~ ~ !.~ ! ! ~ ~ i ~ añ cú''': ..:- ~Ñ ...0 oS;) ~ ...o-c8-SM"g¡~ !:~~::J¡1j~~tr'tN ,.: Ñ":- Ñ .M' ~ ..0 Rf ;5~~~~;;~E cÕ":""":- Ñ añM" ~ N . N ~~?j~~~~~; ~..:-...: M" ,.:. If') ~ rÜ N ~~~ij~~~r:l~ ~":-añÑ M' cÕeñ ~ ~ æ~~~~Fj;~~ .":-eñcJ Ñ ......-añ ~ ;~!~~~~~~ ....:.Ñ Ñ ,.:ñ ~ co t:J"a CO ~ ~~~i~~~~~ ;":-.Ñ cJ ...;. iñ ... ; ~~~~~~~~~ r-Nø-or-.....-"OCON ....r...:,...r..: Ñ tsf.,;- ~ ..õ ~!~~$~~~~ cú' Ñ":: ..: ,...rÑ ~ ~:i~~~~~¡;3 ...:- Ñ ..: McÝ .... .. - - .. III .. .. .. - () =' III C .. .. en .. ....en .. >- .. at '" .. III '"0 en .. ... a::tn 0" L OS-.. .. ~. ~~LA.. ~ ~ "'.... ()..: ~~!~~~.;::::~~ ~ >'"O"C"()()_gQs.. ate:>. ~ ~~~g ~~~~ci.~·~~:; .. CL D. c: '"0 =' .. C "'CI AI . _ .... ='- C r::rc: e: D.C_ 0" ~~&~ëXÆ:j:;~~~~~cS u. ~ a- ~ ,,,-& ~ M š ~ (p a- ..: ~ ~ ,.... ~ ~ ~ iñ r- ~ r- I It') I cr- . ~ r- ëõ M" N ~ M ,.: ~ .S! ......- N ~ ~ ,..., ..... N .; M r- . - I ~ I - t ~i t t . ...0 ,.... C\J t -I 5 I ... , I ~ , KJ: - I M , M t N If') M cro an i;; ~ (\j ;;; KJ .... ~ M ...0 ...0 cñ S N ~ a;- N ~ CO & ~ M CO N .- N ~ Ñ ~ ~ ~ & :;;. Ñ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ., ~ æ a:: ., at .. æ £Q - .. ;: æ a:: '"0 g \.L.. '" '" o S. (!) 3 ;!. ~ .- I '- I I I I I I I ~: I ~~ ~~ ~!: I I I I I I r I ~ ø-.s..-.enn,.".-ø-.ø-._ ... ,... ~~~!!!~~;~-~s;~~ s M ::3lñg~~;:;;<eüj ..þ ... ~ (\J ,... ~:! ~ Kf""-~!!.ñ~--~£ M ~ vicÕ (\J-- cUMRf ~ t- LtJ ~ ,... o >- ,..... t- ....: a:: 5SoCOeDln~~""-.o,...__ ~ I & I~S~~~-~Z~S~~I~ & . ... -...,... CO..þCl'..þ I ... CO f t-~ r- CON,." --.0... ..þ ~ !~ ,...- ..: . I <'Ü ~ cU ~ ('\.f I - I CO . I ~ I I ;qS¡""~f¡~S~;;;cr. ~ I It') 1~:Z~~~S~Z~-R1~I~ s ii ~r--.oM"-_"'~ I If') ~ I ... ~ Ñ ..: - I ! .D <'Ü ~ In I - I I s=> I I §l I I ~S~~~~~~~~~. ,q I r- 1~-_C!D~..þ_SÞ&lSÞ_M~~ ~ , è'8 r- ....... ø'~CO-.o Rt~ ,.... J t- a:: --:1 If') !~ cÕ Ñ -- !:; i ~ ..D ..: ~ ~ a:: a-.ar-K]crr-N-r-¡MSÞ Z ~~Z~~~!~Z~G)i9~I~ ... :;;. ... t-ã ;;; ::-.o~~~~~ Ñ -.0 M ~ M": <ü": ~ ~ .D ..: -- !-- :!; - fH NC!D-a-.i.........-~-· <6 ~~~~~~-~Z~SÞ~~I~ ~ t- t- ~ ~;! ~~;!~ ~ ~ r- r- !a ... ... .... <ü": ~ M ..Þ Ñ ~ !! M -_ ~ ;!.~:;3~~~~~~f)fC!D ~ -:: ~...__SÞ~..þsÆsSÞ-g;I~ & ¡e ...... f7'~ ..þ RiM ~ t- r- f7'...N~CONcr,.... - ..0 ~~ ~ .....:..: <ü": ,.:1 t ..õ Ñ ~ N m'" ~-S;g¡i~~~~~~s . &I ~...SÞ__~SÞSÞs___~I~ ... f7' ¡e...... ~ao..o Rf ~ I t- - 8~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..D Ñ .1 -.0 - -- N- ~ SÞ 1 - J ii'" ..._r-r-,.,,~~crr-...~_ r- r- ~;;z~~~-~z:::-Ri~~~ ... t- æ ~~~ ~::øæ¡ßr- ~ ~ , ~ Ii ..D ..: - - cü": ~ ..D ..: a:- m ~ :;·~§ire~~~;!~SÞ § fù ~~-~~~~~~:::-~~~~ ¡ t- r- m¡ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..Þ .: ; ... - -- N- -.o5CD.-.o.an~W')¡~. ..þ CI' ~~m~~~·~z~SÞ~~~~ (') t- ~ ~r-~~~ ~ c8 ~ . ; Ii .. -.. ~ .. ~ ; ..D ...: ; I ... - - N- ~ I , -(5þ~Mcr~"""'''';jf7'5 Z ~ I;SÞ~~~S~Z~-~~~~ en >- ~ to- a:: :ï; ..þ~:ganM~~ ~ ..0 r- Ii Ñ ..: ,...- .. .D ...: ~ f7' La. . ~C!IIi"'~ñlR;jRiC8~=- ... cr IS_S--ZSÞZSÞ_-""_~ en a-. ~ an If') I to- >- - ~ an... r- an ~ ........._~ ..þ ~~re ~ c:: !I Ñ ..:: ..D a:- ~ ..: c:Ó ::J .., r- . r- - .., ~ -J ~ o en ... ... ",. ... u c U ~ c c ~ ~g.-. ~ ~: ~ c:,. .,. _ =' ~ W :>0. - C .- c: So....... \II Go -6~~~.g 0 0 g~ S 0.. '" c: c: c:... -...ói.,. ~ m ; ~~~~~ a~~~~ _ 0 ~ .~~-~~"'~~~~UGo~ 0 X_--C:".c:_o ... t.O 0. - .. s.. . s.. u - .r:: So. _ .D1 oo~oo..~~... __ __ .,. _ ó5 ;.. 0:: := .; ~._ ~ ~.= ~ -5 --;; ~ AI ~ ~~~5~~Æ~Æ&Ê~~~~Ê ~ <:) CD '" ... .; ~ () ~ () '" '" - _ en at .. .. s- '" ... s- ... ~ ~ - > <:) <:) 0 > _ w-s..oO_QQ ... .- ...... ...... QQ -:;~ a."O~ c: ~_ c:: - - - .- .c .. .. .. a::: So. en.. .. .- s.. ~ _ c: 5 ~ -g ~-5 § 0 .g ~ ~ g :. i ~o .. - s.. .. <:) _ ~ ._ ._ .. .. .. :EEUQ.Q.U-Cl:U)-J::KU.....=> ..... -' ] CD '" -g ... - ~ 0 : ù) m~en 8 ~ s- a.. .. g .. .. ., So. ~ ac: ... <:) S- (!) I '- I ~~~·II·a - ~~-I!~~;~I!~ M ..~~~ ~-.o ~ ~ 1l.G: £..: ..; ~ - - ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ a:- t-ffi ,..... ...0-- ----N CI >- M ~ N ~ to- I a: Pi~~~SK3~~ I In ~~&~!~~~~I!=: If') a- .... t-~ r- ...0 !~ I ..: añ ..: ~ ~ I a: ~~~~&~~~ an ~æ(5)~~~~~~I!~ ë; ø'- iiB r- . Ñ &ñ ..: ~ ii:> ~ I ~gj:::~IK1~~ i ~~&~!~~~~~!~ ~ t- a: cro ~~ ..: Ñ M añ ..: ~t- - ~ I a: I=~~S~~~ ~ ~~&~=1(]~...oK3~&r:; .. I t-æ ...0. -- ~_ N I ø'- !t- ..: ..: M &ñ ..: ~ I !~~~IK1~~ N ~;:!&~Z~~...oK1I&a- ~ t- t- ~ In -- Ri- ~ ø'- co Ii ..: Ñ .- ..ñ Ñ ~ I ~~~~&~~~ -j! ii~&~ZK3~...ofJ(S)&~ a- t- . -- RJ-Z ... a- cr- !~' ..: ..: .- .ñ Ñ ~ ~= ~~~~&ra~~ -.0 ~!&~!~~~~I&~ cr- t- .- ... a- cr- !~ . .ñ Ñ ~ So. I ~~ So. ~~~~lttJ~~ ..ø rB!&~ZK1~(6fJl&C:O a- ~:; t- .. -- (\,1- ~ .. a- a- ~!: !i ..: ..: Ñ ..; añ Ñ ~ ~ ~ I 1~~~&K3~~ -.0 ~~&~!~~!~I&~ ..... .. ~I ï~ a- ..: Ñ .- Ñ :: , I I ~~~~GJtC~~ ~ ~~GJ~!!Ç~~~IGJ~ ..... t- a- ~ ~&i ..: Ñ .- cü z~ - I >- ~~~~~1'J~~ ..ø IJqtO~ZfJ~~K1ltO<5 ~ .. ...- G: a- (\,I -- cr-- _ ~~ ..: Ñ .; Ñ ~ z~ LL. I to ~~~~IK1~~ ~ I~&~!~~!~I(S)~ ~ cr- . to- >- cr- e ~a: -.: ..: Ñ Ñ .; Ñ &' =' .., zl - , I I ..... I & .., I , I .. - '" : '" j ~ ~ -oJ UJ ~ .. - - - L&J I '£ .. u e - u - '" e ~ .. .. e ~ .~ e .. '" ~ .. .. So. - ~ s.. . > a. : .. - ~ - So. ~ :. ~ .= '" s.. ., ~ '" III .= ! UJ Q. "" .. all , - - - CI , '" .- :: -;; e a._ =' - _ So. '" ~ Q .::: . s.. 0 .. e '" s.. .. e o .. _ .. at = .. .. - >-- .. 0 - .::: - -uno-e e '" '" no _ at - _ (!:J (...) s.. .. .. ..... - .. _.- .. - .. .. ..... .. '" e - .- .. - s..-x__..__o a: s.. - x .. '" c:Q _ >--._ 0 U _ '" u :: - - .. s.. s- CIQ - .- :!. - .. -J s.. ..... .- s.. _ .- e s.. a.o___ .. - .. ~ ~ s- o s.. oX"__ U 0. c!å ~: "!: .¡ E i: § ~ -: ~ g.-E U >- a: s- a. - '" a. _ .. ::'~~:I=~x~Æ 0 -~õ:ð~~Æ~gÆ~&:~ a: e t- s- f- IG c:J a: I I '- I ~~ t- ..... o >- t- I a:: i~ I ii~ a:: i~ ii::. ~ I t- a:: ~i! iit- ~ I a:: t-I !-- ~ I t- .- !·i I t- ~>- ii~ lit: t- !~ l- I ~~ ~~ t- §!~ ~>- ~ miE I t- ~g iia I i~ m~ I >- t- a::: !i LA.. I 51 fT" t- >- I c: II =- ., I ...... & ~ I ~ ...J I .. ... o~ :> ~ () r .. c: ~ .... :: I- ~ a:: I I~~ ~~~'~-!II-!I!!~!!;I~I ~~~ ~¿.Ñ~ ~ M _~_ ~ '~I ~;~ ~,..;; st"'z ñ~...... Ñ"';; SI::Z V'§~fT" CÜ,..;; ~:il Ñ"';;~ ::31;!!~ ...........Ñ- ~ ~~~~!! .D "'S!:I.~ (iCìS...Ñ_ ,.: ::~~.~ -a....Ñ- ,.: ~¡Ë ~¡~!!! ÑM~i": I ·"~ISÞ:æ~.~ ìñc8-I~C¡S"'Ñ_ - .. -. - CY M - . ...... . I I SI.~I~~-.~ ì;J)"'-ISÞIt'J~Ñ_ - - - .. CY-- en Slz;e ;e~-.~ ì1i...- SÞen~Ñ_ (\1__ añ" ~!~ ~~¡sj!~ CY-- .ñ" ~!I Ñ~~ ~,~ Ñ~ Z;e~SlSÞ fT"enMÑ . Z!:;~·SÞ "It'JCYÑ ; ~'~J!;;~!SÞ Ñ~ j; I t I I .. '" c: .. ~ UJ .... = - s.. ~ ~ Q .. C ... .. :¡r x 2- So. .... ... . ex :> - s... .. ... - .. .... ;>.. I:Q 0 at .. _ I- .. .- s.. .,. ;;- ~ :: g '"DQ.ECJ:X g La.. ~!~S!~!~~~~= Rt ~ ~!~G)!~~~~~~:: I .: - ~!~G)!~!~?J~~:: ~ ~ I : ¡ I ~Z~G)Z~Z~~~~~:~ -- - - ~ -~ ~.~SÞ.~Z~"'~~~ ~ --Ñ -......- c8 - CiS ~ ~!~C5Þ!~!~~~~:: ~ Ñ ~ ~!~"'!~ªP~~:i'l:i'l ¡! ~!~&!~!~:!~~ i a:- SÞ&~&!~!~~~~ ,..., ìñ a:- ..:- &G)~S.~Z~~~~C5Þ ë8 N -......- an CO .: u) G) C5Þ ~ C5Þ & & <5Þ & _.s. ~ s ...ø N ~~~an~If'JIf) f ~ I ,.: I I t I &SÞ~&:~Z~~~~C5ÞJ~ N -r-- co I~ I ,..... , . I r I I I .. '" ; ~ UJ .... 2- Q .. ~ .. C at .. .. s.. _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~4 E =: :: ~~~~§i i; ~_:: o -=---..s.. ='0 -"-oJ ~_8~x~~.... ~~ :~=.... g ~:..-=~=;",::~~~:;~: ~ .. s.. J:; ~ - I- . I- .-..- _._ t- . :::) . 3 : -f ~ ~ -5 ~ -;- o~ E ~ ~ ~ 0; ~ ~ ~.;- ~ ~~~~~~5~~~Æ~Ë~~8~$ ~ -. I '- I I I I I I I ~: I ~~ ~~ ~g: i5- ~ I I I I I I , I ëia: .....ffi o >- ..... a: i~ ~~ a:: iB ii=> ~ Þ- a:: 8~ iiÞ- ~ a:: iB iiÞ- fH Þ- Þ- Ii Þ- ~>- ii ~. ..... ~~ ii Þ- ~>- ii~ Þ- ~g ~~ Þ- ~~ iiiE >- Þ- a:: ~~ iiffi La.. C5Þ Ø'O Þ- >- . IC ~a: :::J Þ") ¡¡; I ,.... C5Þ .., .. ... c .. ~ L&J :rl -' 1ft .. .~ > ~ en -;; c: .~ .. ~ s.. ~ a: !~S~~S~!!!I!~~IIII~~~~~~~~!;~!I! ~ ~~ ~M ~~~~~£~~~;MM~~~.££~~~~ cû~ Q r- If') ~~S~~S!II~SI~SSS5~!~~~5~1!~&~~~! 5 ~~ ~ ~ ~~ Ñ~ ~ ~ 1=C5Þ~~&III~&I~S5C5Þ5~!!~~~'I!~&~~S~ ~ ~Ñ ~ ~ Ñ~ cû~ ~ ~ 1=&~~5!11~&11&&1&~!!$~1!1~~&~~&! ~ ~Ñ ...: ':":cü" ÑcüÑ ~ ... ~~&~~5···~&~~~Z&.~Z3~~~Z~~~&~~5Z ~ ...... "'M ~~~M .~~s ~Ñ~-~M~~."'Ñ _ 5 MÑ .: ..: M~.ñ": CÛ~Ñ ~ M N _ ,.... !1&~~51!1~11~~~&~~~~~~IIIS!~~~&! ~ ~M ~ .: ÑM': Ñ~Ñ ~ ~ !¡&~~&!!I~II~~&&&!!!~~~II&~&~~&! ~ ~M ~ ...: ÑM"': Ñ;Ñ ~ ~ !1&~~SI!I~II~~5&1!!~~~I!I~!5~~5~ re ~M": ~ "':M~ ~ CÛ.CÛ ~ ~ &~5~~&~··~I~~Z··S.ZZ~~~Z~~~&~~&Z ~ ~. ~M ~~.M ~~... Ñ~-~M.~~.Ñ~ _ ~ ~M ~ ~.: ":Ñ"':~ CÛ.CÛ ~ ~ I~&~~&Z·I~I·~·&~&$ZZ~~~~&~$&~~&= ~ -M ~~ M ~~ ~ ~~-~M~~Z~æ _ ~Ñ": ..: "':cü"': Ñ Ñ.Ñ ~ 5 . - I - . - I ~ I ... I I I ' I=&~~&!I!I&I~&&&&'!!I'~~~!!!!~&! ~I ~Ñ": Ñ Ñ ...:...: ÑM': ..: :~t . I I 1=C5Þ~~S~I!IIIISSII!!!!!~'I~!!!~~!I~ -- - - ---- -- -- - - 1_ ~N - N NN-r- M- N- _ _ I ~ I I I I 1=-~~C5Þ!I!I&I~S&&&!!!!'~!I~!!~~S~!; -- - - - -- -- - .- ~N - N N -- N- _ .r- - I M I . ~ ~ .:: s.. .,. ~ c:::a . ... :; ~ Lt.I .. - ~ ! .:: g >- -~~:: .,.. -=;: - ~ ~ :: ~ - ~..- -~ g ~ ~ :; ! -ž. ... ~ æ ~ ~ ã. ~.,. -~ .; ~ - ~ ~ _ ~~~a:~~~~ _ Z ~.,.~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ : .~--;X ~]~!~~~~~~i~~ :i:...:~ ~ =¡i~ ~ ~ .,. U.._.... -4 --c:_c:..._ ~..o .. _ U .. -.. s.. .c 4 .. - s.. . -,:r - (.J .. .. L .- .- ._ So. _ s.. c: .. III at _ ,. E 0 t- s.. . .. s.. at Q..- a. c .- .- ... .. -,:r _ c: _ 0 .. L _ .. _ (,J.... _ _ ..~a::~~~~~;&~~~:~~:~=~:~~~~~~_:~~~~ ~ ;:~~Õ~~~~~~~~~Ó~~~~Æ~û~5Ë~w~Æ~~E~~ ~ =' o U I '- I I I I I I I ~: ¡¡~ I &1~ ~g: ~- I I I I I I r I csa Ø'" . c:: =' ~ . r- (D ~ .... "" .. .; ~ U'J ,. .~ ~ : s.. ~ ex a!ä! ~ I.IJ 0>- ~ ¡!~~II!I~!!!~S!S! Ñ":": ..:..:..:; ÑIff"':"': ...0 N a: ~ &.AI I~ ii~ ~ !!§~~~~~~-!~~csa!_~ ..D Iii ~:> ~ !!~~~~~I~-!~~_!S~ ..D .: ïæ ~ !!~~~~~I~-!~~-!-~ ..D ..: ~i !~ ~ !!I~~~~I~-!~~-!-~ ñ .: ïã !!I~~~~I~-!~~-!-~ Iff ..: i>- ii~ !!I~~~~~~I!~~-!-~ ñ ..: !~ !!~~~~~~~-~~~-!-- .ñ M I¡ !!~~~~~I~-!~--!-- .ñ' .;- !i ~!~~~~~I~!~~__!S_ .ñ ...r ïi !!~~~~~I~(D!~(D_!__ wi' ~ ïl LA. !!~~~~~~~-~~~-!-~ .ñ ~ >- ~a: iil -. ~Z~~~~~·~-~~~-Z&~ N-ìñ ---(!IS (iU4"__ .ñ:" ...: .. c: .. a. x w :: .. .. c:: .;: s.. 0 .. ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~.~ .,..~ ,,"co __ _ ..:> - ::I ._.,. .,. - c 0 CL :.-=. ; .~ .~ ~ æ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ __ °E ~ ~ _ .. U) .- - - 0 0."0 "" en ., .,. :Þo.._ .. :> 0 -ca:__o._:Þo.cenD oo:>c::o.. d! - ., ; fi ~ ~ ~ .:;: ~ ~ ~:Þo. ~ .~ : ~ -~~~~~i!i6-~i~OOE~~ - - - .. u .- .... .... .,..x .,. :> .. ::I "f _ .,. ._ "CLo.C::-_"''':>C''''_U~o~~ ~~~=x~~~~~ð~~~~~~à ; CD M ~ I~ . I , . ~ ~ &11_ ...:~ M - 4" cD &~~(D :;3 ".. cD S~~(D ~ ".. ar- _~~(D M ,q r:Õ ..: ...: ...: II I _ I ".. I- i ~ ...0 N , r- I II'J , ...: .; t r- I , I I . - &I') ...0 -I f}f. ...: ar: r- I I t , . I~ -~5RS'~ ~ - ì;1) 1...0 r:. ,-,~ , - I to') )q r:Õ -~·&I~ ~ - iñ 1...0 ëó ...: 'I - ~ I M an to') ; _~CSÞ_ -~ co r- r- ~ &~~(D ~ m~~m - , Ki ~ m~~& ~ m~~(D - M an co ,.: m~~_ ...: ...: ~ ~ ~ S~~& ...: ...: ...: ...: ...: - If') ...0 ...: ~ ~ ...0 ...: § ~ ...0 ...: ~ ~'a- ~I~ - . & . a- t ~ ~ an r- r- ...: .ñ' co ...: ...:,: r- CSÞ If) ...0 c:: .. ~ LLJ .~ ~ ... ~ ; CD .. fII ~ ~ .. .. c - x a..,.. .. xw.. ::-..~; at :Þo. _ (.J ca::: So- _ .,. c .. L .. .. ., .c .. s... s.. '" uo._=-s- o .. '" ::I ~ s.. c:: c:: 0 o~o.--u LL.. ,. - o t- .,. .. at s.. 6 -: LL.. -;; - o to- co If') r- - ...: ~: .... r ,.: co ... Ø'" If') ~ .. a- .. ø' ~ '" .. '" ; : æ .. :::J æ 0:: :::~ - 0 ìñ So- _ _(,Din c r- - - a- en 0 _ c .- 1JoC,. - If) ~ to.) at C - ~ = CL o ~ o t- ..ø ..0 I ... r- r- I - ..ø ..0, M -:i -:iJ~ If) . ;:e i If ..ø ..ø II ~ -:i ~. ..0 r- ..ø & CSÞ .... M a- Ñ CSÞ CSÞ II') ;; I~ - - ~ a- tI - " ~ :. II .. II II m CSÞ - It r- II CO II _ It CSÞ II r- II CSÞ C!D (\J If') ... ,..j ~ C5Þ C5Þ r- M cr- ~ cr- m - ~ ~. CD II II II It II CSÞ CSÞ ~ " II II _ n II'J It CO It .. II II II S¡S .... It 4" II a- II - .. M " ..ø II II It II CSÞ s ~ r- añ CSÞ C5Þ M M (\ run II II II II 11 .,. .. .. - .,. .. x .. t- c .. .. ~ ~ c ..a o U 3 o t- .. . o U .!; - .. :z: I ~ I I I I I I I ~~; ~a5 .6i~; If: UI CSII ~ai~ I-Q I I I I I ~ Ii 's .- tI' ...- I __ C .. =' s.. .., U I .. r- 0:: CSII I ëi~ .- ø' 0- to- I; ~ a: !~ ~- a: *~ o <ro g- *CSII è5g: i- .- !; -I CSII - <ro a!: ~g: iE- >- a:: ~~ ø:a - UI L.&.. >- I; .., tI' ãi c:Õ CÞ ~ ..0 ~ ~ an an CÞ ! ~ an .;- tI' M .... tn ..D ..ø M tI' ..ø a:- ..ø CSII & ! M CÞ ... ~ s SÞ CSII CSII -; ð' en .~ c .= . en .. CIQ. ; CÞ ~ M co ..0 t: ~ - an ~ a:- CSII SÞ M M co .- M r- ..Þ ..ø Þf M ø' ... .;- an & . & . - - ~ .. - o U .~ "C o .~ 0.. I~·~-·-~~ CSII - Ñ (\I- re;! ~ ~ ~ã - ~ M ~ M ~ M CD r- eD ..D ~ ~ M ~ ;'! M ~ ~ M I sr r- ~ M ~ M I II ~I ;1 . . cA I ~I ~~ - ~ ~~i;;~ ~i -g~~~~ N.& &--z:;: · c:~~:::2:~ ~~ o c: c C c o 0 to- 0 0 gC:':~"5!!:: I-=,=,--cnacncn .-c:ca.a. ~~~ ~: :~-:;~~LIJLIJ 8~~Jr~_~!ž~ " t . t t-- o _ .. .. _ .. .. ...-uuuuuuaa - .- .- - .- .- W LaJ -»»».......... CI-'-I-'-s..s..-- :c1)J;c1)c1)c1;~ð!ð! >- t- to- ......---......-- £&&&&&&~~ ~ ~ M ..D ~ I I I ~r-I~ -~tCÞ š": r: =~ ~ ~ .; ..0 ëi;; .- t3' 0- t- ~ M en ..0 r- .- ..0 i~ (..) - ~ ~ M tI' ëD r:Õ CÞ ~- ~g: ~- ~ M C\I In ..ø ~ ~;; o <ro g- IR tI' ! i~ .- - IH - ... en .;- tI' i~ ~ M M ..". If') ..Þ ..ø >- - ~~ .., - ~ M ,.... M tI' ..Þ ; ..Þ ~; ~ M & ; ! >-0:: ~~ $ I"') <ro ... .- If') .J - - ø' ã~ $ . ~~ ~- . CSII >- ~~ ~- & CSII >- ;; .., .. -; ~ en ... ~ Q .I: 5 i t- en C =õ c LIJ J::: CO M ~ M 1D .ñ CO ('\J co ~ .ñ g} ~ ~ (\I ~ ãi ... ~ iij Kt ..; CO (\J ~ c:Õ ~ ~ ~ ~ M .ñ If) iñ CO ,.,j ..0 co ..0 r- .;- ..0 -= -- (..) en .= c .= ~ CIQ i ..0 ~ ... M C7" Ñ ~ .... ~ ~ ø' ~ ;::: CO $" r- ~ .... ,.,j ~ r- M C7" ; ø' ~ ; CO ~ .ñ CO -It ..". C7" M ..Þ Cõ r- ñ ~ C\I Ñ .- .- o .. . o U .~ "C o ·E 0. z.~zzz~ ~i~ii~5 ~V)cÕV)"":":S M~-MMt'"')~ Z ~ ,..j z ~ ,.,j z ~ ,.,j ~z 5i ..DV) :2~ Z & ~ M ~ .. ~~ ,..: er- r- cÕ M ..: M z ~ M $ S ~ M ~ ~ M Z & ~ M ~ z ~ ,.,j ,..: r- es. ..Þ ~ ~zz ~i~ csr.ñM" - M z e,) ~ M ~ Q ~ ::> ; t- ~ t;~ - ffi~~~ t--UJ- zo::a::u =~~3 ~~ za:: Š.. .;.;=~~"- C C .., C 00 .- 0 ClQCQ~~~~- ....., ..t--t- ::J'::J _ . () Q () : : .;-.;-:x: ~ EM ~C:;&.ff~~~~ :.. ~ :.. 1., :.. :.. - uU(.a(.a(.a(,Q -..,. .... .... .... .... ....... L.&J »»»~ s... s... s.. s... s... s.. - J;J;c1;~c1;~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~Eš ~ ,..: r- ea --D :2 ¡¡:; r- vi ø' cro Ef ê .~ . 51 If') <Ù ..0 cro ~ If') M z ~ - I M (TO cJ" è3 S & ~ M F"- r- eo M Q M z ~ M I"') ~ .ñ" en (\J & If') ,...: Ri .; r- (\J ¡ u-r YJ ~ ~ (TO & M -It co ~ & If') z ~ M (\J .... M ~ .. z ~ (TO M (5) ~ M M ~ ~ M k1 ...;- CO N 5> & ~ ,...; ~ 03 ~ z ~ M ~ ~ :€ s If') err) ~ .; C\1 ... M añ" If') & S ~ ,..j ;:; CO M ~ .. -;: ~ () ~ ~ Q ~ -- (..) CJt -= ~ c W ~ t- I ~ RECREATIONAL SERVICES, LTD. I IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE REPLANTING CONSTRUCTION BUDGET JUNE 6, 1990 I I 1 · Grass Planting I I I I I' I I 2 0 Maintenance Costs Mid June through August 31, 1990 I I 5. Year One Debt Service I 6. contigency (3. 58%) I A. Fairways and Tees: Planting of 419 bermuda grass 65 acres @ $850/acre B. Greens Planting of bermuda grass 185,000 square feet @ $.12/square feet c. Green and Bunker Surrounds: To solid sod green and bunker edges 3,000 square yards @ $2.15/square yard D. Roughs To plant common bermuda in the open "rough" areas 40 acres @ 100 pounds/acre @ $1.69/pound E. Driving Range To plant 419 bermuda grass 10 acres @ $850jacre 3 . operational Costs Mid June -through August 31, 1990 4 . Bond Issuance Cost I 55,250 22,200 6,450 6,760 8,500 99,160 142,212 90,159 23,000 31,147 ----------------------- 14,322 $99,160 $400,000 I ~ I tS) -.D ~I ,..... C» f): ... ~ r- .. ~ (\J co .. ...þ ... ~, vi oj ,...:s;- .- ~ . ;:: ~ 0' M .... .-. .... .. - ~ ,..... (\J (\J .- a- I (\J CS) ~$ (\J <S) ~ & It') -<e- ,.....z (\J .. M co (\J er- (\J co Ž añlÔ .rr 0'" - ..0 ..0 I 0'" .... M 0' .... ,....... ('of) - -cr f"- eu .... ~ ~ .. an In ($Þ (\J & ,....... N ,..... & S (g (\J C\J an - .... M (5) ~ er- M r- Mañ cü t5f I 0' - .... ...... ~ M ~ an co .. co - (\J '-00 ('\J ...... 4- -cr I"') ~ ~C5Þ~1 ,..... C» ~ .. ... M -4'"~_ .. r- I (\J ..0 ...... " - '00 q) M ~eDcüañ .- ; CI" M 0' -cr OJ ....0 r- U") -cr .. ~ - - ..0 ~.I ...... It') OJ UJ ~ (J) C) a:: La.. ::J a M (\J ~CP~Z~~(S) (\I M I C') a::: r- er- N -cr W a.. ..cr ('\J ...o~"""(5I...o_ &n ('\.I U'") cÖ ';~~š<\j~ c:Õ LA- 3 0' 0"'- CT- -.J C) 0" .- co en ~ I{") _ ...:t- It') 4- 0 --J - - tI") ('\J ...... an ...... l.!J lL. ltJ ::c I en (J') cr <X ,....... '-00 (S)&~~$ I"- C5) cs. M CJ (J r- (\J M(5)&f')(g& ...:t- M r- :J: ('lit') (\J 04- (5)r-(S)co - 04- a::: 4" cÖ&ñ"~&ñ"': cñ z a: a-- r- "" 4" CT' 0 W CI' -cr L(') CT- . 4" M -cr en 0: >- - - \r") ("U - an .... ...... II ði) co ...-\1 $$U")I:gcs;>r-(S) (\J I""'- &f1 tn CU<SÞ(S)&cg <r M r- ...:::r- r-(g(g(gQ) ...0 (\I M M $",:s)',..:j'5f": C'/'" r- -.D ~ ..0 r- CI' 0' OJ -M_.I"') <t" ,....... -4'" - - an M .... I/') - I 0' ...... 4!g5&f')$(5)r-(5) C\J co ...... M ~~~~~ <t- O' an ... "") co - ...... .... (\.J CÜ(5)..D~,,:- Ñ 0' 0' (J'\ ...0 I""'- 0"" I() - N ('\J --crM -cr co 0' I (\J an M ...... u"') en M 1OC5Þ"(5)(5jÞ r- M f"'} 0' ....0 M ~~~~~ 4- ,....... -.D ...... - CSII 0"" Lf') - C\i" ,..: o.iarrcÕv)"':~t9" 0" 0"- CT" I 0' ...z:;) 10 MS-MMMCS) U'} an - I£) M ...... ~ M (\J (5)0 <ü $coes> ...0 C5i> (g (S) .. ;::: M co S r- M (S) ...... <r tr) ~ ('U & (5) ..- ('\J ('\J ..- (9 I (g Š t9 vJ ö.J c::J'" ~ ...0 ...0 - <t- O" N '" ~ - ('\J r- ~ '-00 -..0 .... - - I ;= :; C a. ~ 0 (J (T) "- .- w - ~ ..- cg :> 0: (J I-- ..- s... w z (J) .- ~ ca- W t- ....... Lù - .. <SÞ (f) =f "'CJ :z a::: 0: ~ ~ .c:. c: t-4 ~ W =a:: N ~ U't 0 =:J ..- ~ (S) .4- ð;) .a ", I -é l.LJ u.. ~ (S) ~ 0- U :r .,. "" ~ ~ .. ~ 0 ~ tð c: '"0 "'t] CJ1 -.J 0 c: c: Q! c: c ~ 0 0 t- o ~ I'd W ~ ø:a ~ ~ ..... or:: ~ ..... -0 ~ W (. ~ c: ex C) C a.. - ~ ., ., QI 001 l- t- I-- t-- Lù U ::> s.- ~ ::::a - - en Q en () '- cr:: -f..I' c: c: CL CL l&J ~ ~ :>- Lù Ut 0. .. -; -:; § ~ s.. en c:: :>- :>- W Lt.J ca. 0 Of .. cr CT if) LtJ t- t- en -C t- U 0::: a:: l&J l&J 7 0::: :z ~ '" &:Q I I , I I - ." W 0 .. .. QI 001 ., QI .u (J Q -f..I' (,J U (,J (J (,J (J 0 0 c (II -- 0- Lù W 0 (S) CI'1 - ..... :>- > :> :>- > :>- ~ ,....., 0' C CJ C So. s.- s... s... s... s.. - ~ I {J .. QI ., ., ca- ., ., a! -' '11 ~ c: c: - (.I) () en (J1 en en ex ., ===- c - ;>... t- t- $... ., 0.. ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... - ....... U I CJ1 ... ..., ..D ..a ..D ..a ..a ..a ~a. .. r- ~ Q.I ~ ., Oø ., QI QI GI u3 0:: (g ~ :z: ~ a 0 Q 0 ~ ~ 1- - I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Budget epartment: Council Meeting Date: h /1 1 / q 0 Award of Bid for Bunker Clothes - Fire Department Subject: Agenda Number: PU 90-23 Included in the 1989-90 Operating Budget are funds for the replacement of twenty (20) sets of bunker clothing for North Richland Hills Firemen. The set includes one waist length jacket and one pair of bib overalls with suspenders. Formal bids were solicited, and the results are outlined below. VENDOR TOTAL BID Casco Industries $6,940 Vallen Safety Supply Co. 6,398 *Koetter Fire Protection Service 5,948 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended Council approve the bid for purchase of bunker clothing to *Koetter Fire Protection Service in the amount of $5,948. Finance Review ~ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget . XX Ot~l( ~ ~(~ Department Head S , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 II"' Þ-'¿ ,V'7~>-·:" ~'7} " I Department: Economic Development ~j Equipment Purchases; Iron Horse lW!3ubject: Golf Course - Resolution No. 90-31 .,. . ... . " '.'"»" .., "'<'""""1"'. ".~:->:' '.¿. ···r'«, '. ''\' ~: <.-' ':"...... "." '. '. -. ".~.. '.~ '.. '" 7''''. .~~\ ...«..... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date: 6-11-90 Agenda Number: PU 90-24 I I I I II RECOMMENDATION: I 1'_ I Recreational Services, Ltd. has recommended the purchase of two additional pieces of equipment for Iron Horse Golf Course. Included are: Tractor Triplex Mower 3,899 14,990 $18,889 TOTAL There is sufficient funding available for the purchase of this equipment in the Iron Horse Budget. It is the recommendation of the Golf Ad Hoc Committee, city staff and Recreational Services, Ltd. that Council approve Resolution No. 90-31 authorizing the purchase of the equipment. - Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~ Operating Budget ., Other . Û~ x t4J¡~ ' City Manager , Finance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM 1 Page 1 of I- I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I e/i: ·.··.t' :< ·1······i">;;:·~¥~~:~:1.¡Y.r;L.,;~:, )'>. '.- ,. -<::",-_:··::,-t~~'~·~,;\T>·;·~.;,' . ~~. .. ..' _ . ':i~j~;í;?';:'-~;"f~1~15jc~r~tt\f:~ ~:. o' ~; ,---\ - - ' - - ~- .-~-; ~~!,,":··~·;~'>-~'''''f:''~~' ..: '. ';'- - ; .~~ ~. ,,' :···-:~,,.:'~:,~S·-, ~ - ,. . ~i ~ ·,<~,..,~?-:,];~~ðl'~;:4:{{~1~;.;:.;~:; RESOLUTION NO. 90-31 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas that: 1. The following items are hereby added to authorized Iron Horse Golf Course Equipment List: a. One Tractor b. One Triplex Mower These purchases are to be made from funds heretofore budgeted for golf course equipment. PASSED AND APPROVED this 11th day of June, 1990. APPROVED: Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire - Attorney for the City I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Budget J,epartment: Council Meeting Date: 6/11/90 ~, Award of Pothole Patcher Bid to *RGS Industries Subject: Agenda Number: PU 90-25 Included in the Fiscal Year 1989/90 Utility Fund Operating Budget are funds for the purchase of a replacement Pothole Patcher. The patcher will be used by the Public Works Utility Department in the repair and maintenance of the utility system. Formal Bids were solicited, and the results are outlined below. VENDOR AMOUNT STM Equipment $55,938 *RGS Industries 52,177 RECOMMENDATION: e It is recommended Council Award the bid for a Pothole Patcher to *RGS Industries in the amount of $52,177. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) - Operating Budget ., Othe - Finance Review Acct. Number 02-11-02-6400 OJ ~~ff~Cient Funds ~lIable Tt:fe/ ("_{/,,, Ct- I 7JI~ce Director -XX- e rtment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date: h /' 1 "q n Envelopes to *Frontier Printing Agenda Number: PU 90-26 On May 31, 1990, formal bids were received and opened for the purchase of Utility Bill Statements and Envelopes. The quantities of each are as follows: Outgoing Window Envelope Return Envelope Regular Statement Delinquent Statement 120,000 120,000 240,000 240,000 The results of the bids are outlined below. VENDOR AMOUNT Minuteman Press Tarrant Printing Vintage Printing Presto Printing Vanier Graphics *Frontier Printing Graphic Concepts $13,192 13,114 13,051 12,732 11,496 11,326 Vendor did not meet specifications Vendor did not meet specifications Incomplete Bid Service Info Systems Standard Register RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council award the bid for the Purchase of Utility Bill Statements and Envelopes in the amounts noted above to *Frontier Printing in the amount of $11,326. Finance Review Acct. Number 02-20-01-2600 ffi i,nt Funds Available Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other -e _7Jlc-~ ~ xx - ~ .. ~. ..",ancs Director - ~ Department Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS epartment: Award of Fork Lift Bid to *Omni Equipment Subject: Budget Council Meeting Date: 6/11/90 Agenda Number: PU 90-27 In an Informal Report to the Mayor and City Council at the February 12,1990 Council meeting, the need for a fork lift was discussed. The fork lift will be used by Public Works and Vehicle Maintenance when moving equipment from the loading dock to its ultimate destination. At the meeting, staff was recommended to obtain bids and submit to City Council for approval. Formal bids were solicited, and the results are outlined below. VENDOR AMOUNT Briggs Weaver $19,995 Lone Star Lift Truck Clarklift of Ft. Worth 18,668 18,583 17,673 14,500 Darr Equipment *Omni Equipment RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended Council award the bid for a fork lift to *Omni Equipment in the amount of $14,500. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other xx Finance Review Acct. Number ufflclent Fu ( f 02-11-01-6400 AvailableO ~ ~nanceDlrector rtment Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS epartment: Bud2et Council Meeting Date: 6/11/90 Approval of Purchase of an additional Tanker Truck and Subject: Award of Bid for the One Ton Pick-up to *Bruce Lowrie Agenda Number:PU 90-28 and the Fire Fighting Unit Bid to *Casco. At the Fiscal Year 1989/90 Budget Retreat, City Council and Staff discussed the purchase of two "mini-attack" Tanker Trucks to replace one "conventional" type truck for fighting grass fires. The conventional tanker truck is a 1965 model International Harvester. Often, replacement parts must be custom manufactured by Fire Department personnel as they are no longer available. The Fiscal Year 1989/90 General Fund Operating Budget included funds for the purchase of one "mini-attack" Tanker Truck. City Council awarded the bid at the January 22, 1990 meeting. The staff recommends the purchase of an additional tanker at this time in order to retire the "conventional" tanker truck. Currently, funds are available in the city Council's reserve for contingency to purchase the additional truck. The total cost of the truck includes a one ton truck, fire fighting unit and miscellaneous hand tools and equipment for a total of $31,500. If the City purchases the second tanker at this time, the bid prices quoted in January 1990 can be obtained as Bruce Lowrie Chevrolet and Casco have agreed to honor their January 1990 prices. This would likely be less costly than delaying the purchase. The bid prices as awarded at the January 22, 1990 City Council Meeting are noted below: One Ton Pickup: *Bruce Lowrie Chevrolet 15,231 Fire Fighting Unit: *Casco 6,000 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve the purchase of an additional Tanker Truck and award the bid for the One Ton Pick-up to *Bruce Lowrie in the amount of $15,231 and the Fire Fighting Unit bid to *Casco in the amount of $6,000 and approve a transfer from the City Council's Reserve for Contingency in the amount of $31,500 to the Fire Department. Finance Review Acct. Number 01-90-04-6600 Sufficient Fun s Available I / , Finance Director ignature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: I ~Ubject: I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Public Works Council Meeting Date: 06/11/90 Agenda Number: PW 90-25 Approve Budget for Holiday Lane :Loop e:20 Borth to ÞTOrgâ~t DriT7Q The subject section of Holiday lane is in bad condition. Continuous patching by our Public Works Department is required. Heavy traffic volumes accelerate the deterioration. Curb & gutter has sunk or rose in several places. This has caused numerous "bird baths" to exist on this section of road. More repair work is necessary in order to solve the curb & gutter and drainage problems. An "overlay" with miscellaneous subgrade replacement would not last any amount of time before it would begin cracking and moving around. A total reconstruction of the street is necessary for a long term solution. Based on unit prices from the IISmithfield Road Paving and Drainage Improvements" project, we have estimated the reconstruction costs at $190,000 (see Estimate No.1 attached). The Smithfield Road contract was originally for $875,052. Change orders up to a total amount of $218,763 can be allowed on this project. The prices bid on the Smithfield Road Project appear to be very reasonable. We also would point out that this would be the quickest way to come to a legal agreement with a Contractor. The Contractor has initially indicated he is willing to take this project on as a change order to the Smithfield Road Project and finish the construction before school starts in late August. Funding Source: The draw-down schedule presented to City Council in January 1990 allocated approximately $830,000 for fiscal year 1989/90. All of those funds have been appropriated to various projects. We have appropriated approximately $167,000 of the $675,000 in draw-down funds projected to be available for fiscal year 1990/91. Funds for this project can be appropriated from the 1990/91 draw-down schedule in the amount of $200,000. It should be noted that if funds are appropriated from the 1990/91 draw-down schedule, the remaining balance for future projects and change orders will be limited to approximately $300,000. Recommendation: The staff and CIP Committee recommend the City Council approve the subject funding source budget and project described above. Final change order document will be sumbitted to the Council on June 25th. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number 13-43-90-6000 ds Available ~ . Finance Director ment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of H OLn:::tAY' LA/J1t - '-~ \. ÞO-- .- --. ~ .- ~ I \ 1 \ RLLi~ ~' P? ~ L~:=:" 7 ~-t71t HOLI:::GHTS c .~ CIoH ....D01l :W~ ~ I : I ". I T I I I r- ILI:... I I 1.1. I r I C R I' ~~ D A J" ,VII. ¡I /' t I II IT I~ H I G H I I 1 1 ' \ __I- SCHOOL ~ ~ w ~ CC ~I~ I I ~ Or - - o.J.JAl¡ '-lJ =-..: ____ -~~ -..+-; --+-- -r~ I IIIb-_r.J ~~~ -- --------- +-.....1--! T- 1--.....1 :.D p- __ _ __ ---~ ::= == .........:- -- i I I I ...- - tz -- ~ . C! ; .1 '!':= '~14;:; ì J~ ~t:r ~ .' -.. ¡ ~ J CJ::J~- - L:=JI:.-.:: -----.J ~ L.L...I.' - r- ---¡¡j~ ~ ppt N ... w "I'!PLLWO -- ~ , .J;___ == I ~ t-rTI -- ---- ~. 4~~ ___~ j ¡~::: :;:~~: :~ II J~:=~ T T ~~ iT IT -Ä~ ~-~CZ~" ~\" ~~~ \ :~ ~L ~ I ' 2f§:J CIJL!j:líTIT i-;- 'í;~ erm a ~ -~m'-- ~~ -== == .-: ~'-Io~t-~~- ì T \ U 11 I I -~= =~c .---;t--Þ--~~ \J f L r J 11 I / ~ -~4 ~-IIIi~~:Þ-- .-' == == '-- CI . ~ T. 0 \ I r 1 _ _ _ 1 iii ~- ~~ ~, ,..1 , it \J- :~I.----: -~ I T - .=... -c~..~ -- -L \-! T _lu-íI -c-- --~-I~¡~ T I :::::c: =11 --:-v r11 ~ -~ ~ - -- --0--" 4 :=r= =H t-- t:- ~_G~ r r ~ -W ~ _ _ ~~ . I I r:¡ r " i J' III lì~ :::ø ..!!!~,.~~ ~~ ~ _ II I "I ~ - I!. I - c IW l:! ICI ~- I = 4i ~ - I_~ I --- - ÞO-- - _ -.- II. - i--_ _~ ~- ~_ __ -'¡¡)j .~ 'II taflY n., L. __ ~- i--þÞ- "- - -~ '''0, ...... _ ~ ~ ~ - 10.....- _ -I ÞO- '~Þ-- ~I--_ ¡;:.....-."'I I ,¿ ~ -- -~ ~~-~v ~ '- --1)0----1_ -~Io-v < ". ~ ~ ~ _ ~ I&- V ,.~ ~I!' --t. ~~~ ¡;:: --~~~; f f D",Vf' -- --~ ... ' ~ 0 ~ t I .~ I ~.. I ~~~ ~ r-- = r' ~-- !~- I 12 t- - . J - ~ RICHL AND / )' ' ~ '-BM~ -~ þ I~ Trrv D~IVL~~_ t- ~ . t ~ I 'Æ~ T \ . . -~ -~ - ::~~ T . IV I! ~. L.- '-- \=: c '"' .,-;. ~ / - - ~ .....- E~ , r IIAA, ~ "ç ,. /' /' '- .......... '~, ¡. 1- 'I I ~ITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I ~INEER'S ESTIMATE DATE: MAY 21, 1990 BY: JOHN A. JOHNSTON I PROJECT: HOLIDAY LANE RECONSTRUCTION FROM LOOP 820 TO NOR'EST DRIVE ESTIMATE #1: TOTAL RECONSTRUCTION OF STREET AND AL~ CURB AND GUTTER I ===============================================================================: ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL I ======================================================--===================~====: 1 UNCLASS. STREET EXCAVATION 1,500.00 C.Y. $5.00 $7,500.00 2 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER 4,300.00 L.F. $1.80 $7,740.00 I 3 LIME STAB. SUBGRADE 8" THICK 11,590.00 S.Y. $1.50 $17,385.00 4 LIME FOR STAB. SUBGRADE 232.00 TON $64.00 $14,848.00 5 PRIME COAT 11,590.00 S.Y. $0.25 $2,897.50 I 6 TACK COAT 9,677.00 S.Y. $0.15 $1,451.55 7 TYPE 'A' 2" THK HMAC (4" TTL) 19,354.00 S.Y. $2.50 $48,385.00 8 TYPE 'D' 2" THK HMAC 9,677.00 S.Y. $2.60 $25,160.20 9 NEW 6" CURB AND 24" GUTTER 4,300.00 L.F. $6.00 $25,800.00 I 10 CONC. DRIVEWAY 5" THICK 1,440.00 S.F. $2.10 $3,024.00 11 CONC. VALLEY 6" THICK 4,860.00 S.F. $2.10 $10,206.00 12 CONC. SIDEWALK 4" THICK 2,405.00 S.F. $2.00 $4,810.00 1..i3 TOPSOIL FOR FILL 4" THICK 955.00 S.Y. $1.70 $1,623.50 ~ SOLID SODDING 478.00 S.Y. $2.00 $956.00 ~5 HYDROMULCH 478.00 S.Y. $0.50 $239.00 I I I I * ITEM COSTS ARE TAKEN FROM: SMITHFIELD ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE PROJECT I I I Ie I HOL EST1.WKl ....-------------- ---------------- SUB-TOTAL SURVEY, ENGINEERING AND CONTINGENCY (10%) $172,025.75 $17,202.58 -------------_.. --------------- TOTAL $189,228.33 1/ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CHANGE ORDER NO. . fò1r © [g D\Yl ~ ~, 2 TO THE CONTRACT VE ~k' I V~A~d> &I) ! ; . III~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND~ L~ , OCTOBER 5, 1989 (OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) K·E·P NO. 3-344 Between i"/.I; ~; i ..á And APAC · TEXAS For (Description of Project) SMITHFIELD ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: Reconstruct Holiday Lane from I.H. 820 to Nor'east Drive. Add the following quantities to the existing items in the Contract: ITEM UNIT EST. TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANT. COST 1P Unclassified Street Excavation C.Y. 55.00 1,500 $7,500.00 3P Remove Existing Curb & Gutter L.F. 1.80 4,300 7,740.00 4P Remove Concrete Flatwork S.F. 0.55 10,604 5,832.20 SP Saw Cuts L.F. 2.10 542 1,138.20 6P 8" Lime Stab. Subgrade S.Y. 1.50 11,590 17,385.00 7P Lime TON 64.00 232 14,848.00 8P Prime Coat S.Y. 0.25 11,590 2,897.50 9P Tack Coat S.Y. 0.15 9,677 1,451.55 lOP Type "A" BMAC, Compacted 2" Thick S.Y. 2.50 19,354 48,385.00 lIP Type "D" HKAC, Compacted 2" Thick S.T. 2.60 9,677 25,160.20 12P Type "D" For Transitions TON 26.00 42 1,092.00 13P 6" Curb & 24" Gutter L.F. 6.00 4,300 25,800.00 14P 5" Thick Concrete Driveways S.F. 2.10 3,086 6,480.60 15P 6" Thick Concrete Valleys S.F. 2.10 6, 144 12,902.40 16P 4" Thick Sidewalks S.F. 2.00 6,288 12,576.00 20P Adjust Vater Valve & Cleanout To Grade EACH 220.00 1 220.00 2IP Adjust San. Sewer Manhole To Grade EACH 250.00 2 500.00 24P 4" Deep Topsoil S.T. 1.70 2,196 3,733.20 25P Grass Solid. Sodding S.Y. 2.00 1 ,478 2,956.00 26P Hydromulch S.Y. 0.50 718 359.00 35P Vheelchair Ramps EACH 320.00 18 1~~B~:ßß 37p Joint Sealing L.F. 1.10 1,550 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST .......................... 520'6,421.85 EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT.......................... 870,658.50 REVISED CONTRAcr AMOUNT ········..................$1,077,080.35 Contract completion time shall be increased by 75 days because of this change. CONTRAcrOR'S OEF,BR OF, .PROPOSED CHANGE: " /) ,,/ ) / . / · all'/ -. ,<. ( -'.... D. By. / (/ ./,..c :. ~" ~ ~__~t-,/ . /..-:--." ate. June 11 , 1990 .;" ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE: By: OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: Date: , 1990 By: Date: , 19~0 I I Department: - I Subject: Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) - Operating Budget - Othe[ I I I I I I Ie CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works Council Meeting Date: 06/ 11/90 Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 4 in the Amount of $23,141. sa to Wright CORgtructioR CQmpany for Agenda Number: PAY 90-09 Bogart/Deaver Drive Drainage Improvements This CIP project was awarded by the Council November 27, 1989, for $241,119.06 to Wright Construction Company. No change orders were approved on this project. Final payment to the contractor will make his total earnings on the project $231,415.79. The Contractor substantially completed this project on March 3, 1990. The project is now totally complete with all final adjustments having been made. Funding Source: Sufficient funds were appropriated for the project and the summary of cost are detailed below. Budget Difference Transferred From utility CIP Unspecified Difference Transferred To Drainage CIP Unspecified Actual 02-86-15-6000 Water 13-32-89-6000 Drainage $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $10,464.60 <$10,464.60> $241,119.06 $220,951.19 $ 0.00 $ 20,167.87 ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ Totals $241,119.06 $231,415.79 <$10,464.60> $ 20,167.87 Recormnendation: The staff recormnends approval of final payment to Wright Construction Company in the amount of $23,141.58 and the transfer of funds as detailed above. Finance Review ~ee Above GO/REV Acct. Number s~c~nd~/;1: ~_ fj ~/()~ ent Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director P e 1 of I I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas May 11, 1990 '~1 \íRì ~ {Ë~. D.~:2- r'~ J ~.. : : \ J } , ~ \ ',:; ~A Av 1 ¡i jC:C-f"\ 1"\.1 1 4 ,,-../\J Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E. Director of Public Yorks City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 :,JuL ~_________........... ___ f l r 4«~ "..,.. Re: 3-360, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, BOGART/DEAVER DRIVE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIM. NO. 4 & FINAL Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.4 & Final, dated May 9, 1990, made payable to Yright Construction Co. in the amount of $23,141.58, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of April 20, 1990. The quantities and conditions of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Mr. S.L. Zuckman, as indicated by his signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. The Original Contract Amount for this project was $241,119.06. No change orders were added to the contract. Final Contractor earnings total $231,415.79 which is $9,703.27 under the Contract Amount. The $9,703.27 savings can now be transfered to the the Unspecified Drainage Account for use in other projects. The Scheduled Completion Date for this project was March 3, 1989, and we understand that the project was Substantially Complete before that date, therefore no liquidated damages were incurred nor should any be assessed. The two (2) year term of maintenance begins on this date, and therefore, will terminate on May 11, 1992. The maintenance obligation includes repair of all water line leaks and malfunctions of all valves, and other equipment furnished and installed under this contract along with storm sewer line breaks or stoppage. The maintenance obligation also includes sealing of trench pavement replacement cracks, repair of pavement buckling or other failures resulting from storm drain or water line backfill settlement or other subgrade failure, along with failure of all concrete flatwork and other concrete structures such as storm drain vaults and inlets. Continued next page ... 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I May 11, 1990 BOGART-DEAVER DRAINAGE FINAL Page 2 Ve understand that City Forces have monitored tr~nch densities, and compaction has been in accordance with the project specifications. After an Affidavit of Payment of all bills has been obtained from the Contractor, we recommend that this final payment, in amount of 523,141.58, be made to Vright Construction Co., 601 V. Vall St., Grapevine, Texas 76051. Ve will be present at the June 11, 1990, Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. w.~ RICHARD V. ALBIN, P.E. RYA/bvg/f3359119 Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Assistant City Manager Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. S.L. Zuckman, City Inspector Yright Construction Company I Page 1 of 2 CON T R ACT 0 R ' S EST I MAT E - - - - - IEstimate No. ~~ No. F3360.V20 ~ect Description: I' . Contractor: Yright Construction Co. lowner: City of North Richland Hills Place: North Richland Hills, Texas 4 & Final - - - - Job No. 3-360 9-MAY-1990 75 18-DEC-1989 3-MAR-1990 Date: Cal. Days: BOGART/DEAVER DRIVE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Y.O. Date: Scheduled Completion Date: For Materials Furnished and Labor Performed in Period Ending: Time Charged Thru Period (Days): 20-APR-1990 123 PREVIOUS THIS UNIT I~~: ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT -- ----- ---.. - -.-----.-.----.- --------.- -------.- ---------- .---------- ----...---- CONCRETE STORM DRAIN PIPE : ~ 10. 48"Dia.(ASTM C-76 CI.III) RCP L.F. 1,460.00 0.00 1,460.00 $62.61 $91,410.60 20. 42"Dia.(ASTM C-76 CI.III) RCP L.F. 284.00 0.00 284.00 52.11 14,799.24 130. 30"Dia.(ASTM C-76 Cl.III) RCP L.F. 275.00 0.00 275.00 36.27 9,974.25 4D. 21"Dia.(ASTM C-76 CI.III) RCP L.F. 225.00 0.00 225.00 28.48 6,408.00 50. 18"Dia.(ASTM C-76 Cl.III) RCP L.F. 330.00 0.00 330.00 26.77 8,834.10 1 TOTAL CONCRETE PIPE $131,426.19 MISCELLANEOUS DRAINAGE: II 60. 7' Sq. Vault at Sta 0+22 L.S. 70. 5'-10" Sq. Vault at Sta.8+92.5 L.S. I 80. 10'x7' Vault at Sta. 14+91 L.S. . 5'-3" Sq. Vault at Sta. 17+80 L.S. 1 . 4' Sq. Vault at Sta. 20+59 L.S. lID. 20'Std.Cast-In-Place Cb Inlet EACH 112D. 15'5td.Cast-In-Place Cb Inlet EACH 130. 10'Std.Cast-In-Place Cb Inlet EACH 14D. Saw Cut of Ex. Asph. or Cone. L.F. 115D. Remove Ex. Curb & Gutter L.F. 16D. Rmv & Replace Ex. Asph. Pvmnt S.Y. 17D. Rmv & Replace Ex. Cone. Pvmnt S.Y. 1180. 6"Curb & 24"Gutter (6"Thk G.) L.F. 190. Topsoil 4" Deep 5.Y. 200. Solid Sodding Grass S.Y. 21D. Drain. Trench Safety Systems L.F. 11220. Misc. Drainage Allowance L.S. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 10.00 5,738.00 496.00 2,353.00 33.00 127.00 145.00 0.00 2,529.00 0.00 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS DRAINAGE: I I I I- I 0.00 1.00 $4,100.00 $4,100.00 0.00 1.00 2,600.00 2,600.00 0.00 1.00 4,600.00 4,600.00 0.00 1.00 2,300.00 2,300.00 0.00 1.00 1,800.00 1,800.00 0.00 4.00 2,600.00 10,400.00 0.00 5.00 2,200.00 11,000.00 0.00 10.00 1,500.00 15,000.00 0.00 5,738.00 1.00 5,738.00 0.00 496.00 1.00 496.00 0.00 2,353.00 11.50 27,059.50 0.00 33.00 41 . 00 1,353.00 0.00 127.00 12.00 1,524.00 0.00 145.00 2.00 290.00 0.00 0.00 2.20 0.00 0.00 2,529.00 0.50 1,264.50 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 $89,525.00 I CON T R ACT 0 R ' S EST I MAT E Page 2 of 2 - - - - - IEstimate No. 4 & Final Job No. 3-360 Date: F~ No. F3360.V20 Cal. Days: I~ct Description: BOGART/DEAVER DRIVE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS V.O. Date: Scheduled Completion Date: For Materials Furnished and Labor Contractor: Vright Construction Co. Performed in Period Ending: IPwner: City of North Richland Hills Time Charged Thru Period (Days): 1F1ace: North Richland Hills, Texas 9-MAY-1990 75 18-DEC-1989 3-MAR-1990 20-APR-1990 123 PREVIOUS THIS UNIT t~: ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT - - --- ---- - _____. __________ ___ ---..---.- --------. ---------- ----------- -----.----- TOTAL FROM PAGE NO. 1 $220,951.19 II VATER CONSTRUCTION: IV. 6"Dia. (DR-18) PVC Vater Pipe L.F. 50.00 0.00 50.00 $33.46 $1,673.00 112V. 6"Dia. (C1.50) D.!. Vater Pipe L.F. 18.00 0.00 18.00 47.60 856.80 3Y. 6"Tap.Sleeve & 6"Tap.Gate V. EACH 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,056.00 1,056.00 4V. Ductile Iron Fittings LBS. 1,360.00 0.00 1,360.00 1.40 1,904.00 5V. Connect 6" Vater Line to Ex. EACH 3.00 0.00 3.00 700.00 2,100.00 II 6V. Cut & Plug Ex. Vater Line EACH 4.00 0.00 4.00 550.00 2,200.00 7Y. Cut, Plug & Block Ex.Vat.Line EACH 1.00 0.00 1.00 600.00 600.00 8Y. Yater Line Trench Safety L.F. 68.00 0.00 68.00 1.10 74.80 19V. Misc. Plumbing Allowance L.S. 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 TOTAL VATER UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS: $10,464.60 II.. - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Field Verification of Job Conditions ~nd Confirmation of Pay Quantities Approved: Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. Consulting Engineers By: f2M-~W. ~ (Project Manager) ry: St~ D,zAFT Lop'/. (Owner's Project Representative) fa te: , 19 _ Da te: 5 ~ I / ,19 <10 - -- --.- -- --- ---- ----- -- - ------ - ---------- -- -. __e. - ____ ___ - - - - - ___ - - - __ - - - - - __ ____ - - - - _. - - - - ___. I II I THIS MONTH'S BILLING: To tal . . . . . . . . . . . . To tal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $231,415.79 0% 0.00 231,415.79 75% 0.00 231,415.79 208,274.21 $23,141.58 Returned Ret.$23,141.58 Less Percent (%) Retained . . Difference . . . . . Plus (%) Materials on Hand TOTAL: $23,141.58 Less Previous Payments Difference Due This Estimate (Note: Pay Last Amount Shown) ----------- ----------- --- -- -- --- __e. - ___ __ - ______ __ ____ - ____ .___ __ ___ ___ - - - __ - __ __ - - - __ __ ____ - - ___ - __ - - - ___ - - - - - - - ___ IIrotal Earnings (Incl. Retain.): Ikime Charged Thru This Period: $231,415.79 Bid: $241,119.06 123 Time: 75 Percen t : Percen t : 95.98 164.00 Ie I