HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1990-10-08 Agendas
I
I
I - · For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
I
I
I
rl
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 8, 1990 - 6:15 P.M.
! NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
1. PS 90-21 Request of Gary B. Starnes and James M. Starnes
for Final Plat of Orange Valley Addition (Located
at the northeast corner of Starnes Road and
Douglas Lane) (Postponed at the September 24th
Meeting) (Agenda Item No. 10) (10 Minutes)
2. GN 90-146 Recycling (Agenda Item No. 15) (5 Minutes)
3. GN 90-144 Increase in Surgery Fees for Adopted Animals
(Agenda Item No. 13) (5 Minutes)
4. IR 90-98 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan
Update (5 Minutes)
5. GN 90-145 Amendment to Subdivision Ordinance - Policy for
Payment of Taxes and Assessments - Ordinance
No. 1694 (Agenda Item No. 14) (5 Minutes)
6. Other Items (5 Minutes)
I'
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
! NUMBER ! ITEM I ACTION TAKEN
7. *Executive Session (30 Minutes)
a. Personnel
b. Briefing on Pending Litigation
c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition
8. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m.
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is
contemplated, it will be taken in open session.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 8,1990
For the Regular Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301
Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion
and/ or action.
NUMBER ! ITEM i ACTION TAKEN
1. ! Call to Order
2. , Roll Call
3. I Invocation
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting
September 24, 1990
5. Presentations by Boards & Commissions
None
6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent
Agenda
7. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by
Asterisk (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, & 17)
8. PZ 90-14 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request of Keith and Jo
Ellen Anderson to Rezone a Portion of
Tract 3D, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract
1055, from AG Agriculture to R-l Single
Family (Located on the east side of Crane
Road, south of Amundson Road)
9. Ordinance No. 1693
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
I NUMBER I ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
10. PS 90-21 Request of Gary B. Starnes and James M.
Starnes for Final Plat of Orange Valley
Addition (Located at the northeast corner
of Starnes Road and Douglas Lane)
(Postponed at the September 24th
Meeting)
*11. PS 90-24 Request of James R. Harris and Joe
Wright for Final Plat of Steeple Ridge
Addition (Located west of Davis
Boulevard and north of Shady Grove
Road)
*12. GN 90-143 Authorization to Execute Deed to Lot lR,
Block C, Smithfield Addition - Resolution
No. 90-44
*13. GN 90-144 Increase in Surgery Fees for Adopted
Animals
*14. GN 90-145 Amendment to Subdivision Ordinance -
Policy for Payment of Taxes and
Assessments - Ordinance No. 1694
*15. GN 90-146 Recycling
*16. GN 90-147 Approve Granting Easements from City of
North Richland Hills to Southwestern Bell
Telephone
I-
I
I -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 3
! NUMBER ! ITEM I ACTION TAKEN I
*17. PAY 90-20 Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 10 in the
Amount of $21,184.79 to M.A. Vinson
Construction Co. for Calloway Branch
Drainage Channel Improvements, Phase I
18. Citizens Presentation
19. Adjournment
POSTED
By
I
I
I~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. I R 90-98
Date: October 8, 1990
Subject: Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update
The Parks and Recreation Board and Staff have been working with
consultants from Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc. since
mid-July 1990 on the development of a Comprehensive Parks, Recreation
and Open Space Master Plan. The meetings held to date have provided
an orientation for the Parks and Recreation Board on park system
planning principles and methodology.. The Park Master Plan meetings
have also been attended on a regular basis by many citizens and
community based special interest groups including five separate youth
sports organizations.
Park Master Plan status (October 2, 1990)
- Inventory and Supply Analysis - Staff has provided the consultant
with the researched ~ata.necessary to identify the eXisting and
potential park and reci~ation ~esou~~es, facilities, and programs
provided to the citizens of the community. This inventory and
analysis included public, private, city, ànd school district
facilities and resources. Parks and recreation special interest
groups, recreation associations and organizations, such as youth
sports associations,.-were. ç9ntacted~And,participation rates were
'- ~~"''''.., .......'." ~ '- _"'.....-":.,.\.\..·...,..l, ._~--' 1_......._ r _' '..._.:..~_-,{". '~~J." '.' .1._ ....~_...... ~
documented inclùding projections for future growth.
- ""1:. .
- .' ~ I " ~.. ..... ,." ":' ..
-" . ..... .
- Population Analysis - Staff and consultants have assimilated
population and demographic data based on North Central Texas Council
{)f Gov'ernments data, 1990 Census Bureau data, 11eighborhood "rooftop"
counts from aerial. photographs and survey questions regarding
demographic elements.
- Standards Analysis - The consultants have evaluated North Richland
Hills current park and recreation resources in comparison to
nationally accepted park and recreation standards. Both a "low
l-ange" and a "high l-ange" of park acreage and recreation facility
guidelines (see attachments) have been presented to the Parks and
Recreation Board to assist them in determining appropriate
standards, specific to North Richland Hills, for recommenàation to
Council.
- Park Planning Sectors - The Parks and Recreation Board has approved
the designation of seven park planning sectors within the City of
North Richland Hills (see attached survey for illustration of
sectors). The criteria for determining the planning sector
boundaries included:
1. Relationship to existing public facilities
a. Park and recreation sites
b. Schools
c. Easements and right-af-ways
d. Major divisional streets
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I
I
I~-
Ie
I
I
I
-I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
2. Level· of similar existing and potential residential development
a. Density of housing
b. Density of population
3. Relat~onship to potential public facilities
a. Park and recreation sites
b. Schools
c. Major divisional streets
4.. Relationship to open space and environmental features
5. Conformance to park service radius standards
- Demand Analysis - The Parks and Recreation Board has approv~d'\a
survey instrument (see attachments) developed by the staff and
consultant. Responses from the survey are currently being ._.
tabulated by Staff for evaluation and analysis by the consult~nt.
A statistically accurate confidence level of 90% has been ach~eved
t111"'oug11 the applied survey methodology. The surveys are being·-<·.
a11alyzed by individual plannil1g sectors al1d by overall ci tywid.'e
response. The survey results will be presented and discussed ~b the
November 13, 1990 n1eeting. A "public l1earing" will be 11eld Nò~vember
27, 1990 in order to obtain further public input for the demand
analysis phase of the Parks Master Plan.
- Mandatory Park Land Dedication Ordinance - The consultant is
currently meeting with City Staff from Parks and Recreation,
Community Development, Economic Development, Finance, Public Works,
Legal and Administratiol1 for t11e pllrpose of developing a proposed
mandatory park land dedication ordinance to be presented along~with
the Park Mastel- Plan for Council l"'eview. T11is additional serv.ice is
approximately 75% complete at this time. .; .
- Evaluation of Possible School District/City Cooperative Progra.- _
A representative of the Birdville Independent School District~JBill
Fenimore, Board Member) attended the September 18, 1990 Park JlÌfa,ster
Plan meeting to participate in a presentation by the consultarits
regarding the benefits of city/school cooperative efforts. 'ßbme of
the benefits discussed included: . I
1. Grouping of facilities in order to share parking lots, lighting,
streets and infrastructure.
2. Reduced cost by combining planning efforts (engineering,
architectural costs, etc.).
3. Better scoring opportunities and potential doubling of rnon~es
through Park and Wildlife Department Grants. _,
4. Reduced operational costs for shared facilities. city and
school district splitting operational and maintenance costs on
seasonal or otherwise designated basis.
5. "Bigger Ba11g for the Buck" by consolidating sel-vices alld
facilities serving the same taxpayer.
Formal invitations are being extended to all Birdville Independent
School District Board Members and Administration to attend a11d:
participate in upcoming Park Master Plan meetings.
I
I
.
I -.-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
1
The preceàing summaries should bring you up to date on some of the
early Ithighlights" in the development of our Park, Recreation and Open
Space Master Plan. The upcoming meetings listed on the attached
schedule will be very important in the development of specific
recommendations, establishment of standards and guidelines,
prioritization of needs, funding strategies, development of an agency
action plan and implementation. The Parks and Recreation Board and
Staff continue to enthusiastically extend an invitation to the Council
to attend and participate in this exciting planning process.
ð=l~
~~ Browne
Parks and Recreation Director
I
I
I~-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
II
!I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Comprehensive Master Plan for Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Proposed Schedule of Meetings
for 1990 between
Parks and Recreation Board and Schrickel, Rollins & Assoc.
JULY 16
First Meeting - Pre-Council Chambers 6:30 P.M.
Initial remarks. Purpose of plan.
Discussion of planning process and schedule.
Presentatioll al1d discussiol1 of sllrvey instrtlnlellt.
AUGUST 21
Second Meeting - Pre-Council Chambers 6:30 P.M.
Inventory and observations of eXisting parks.
Discussion of general planning elements.
Application of appropriate park planning guidelines.
SEPTEMBER 18
Third Meeting - Community Center Auditorium 6:30 P.M.
Preliminary findings regarding general locations,
acreages, and facilities for future parks.
Discussion of the park system and service zones.
NOVEMBER 13
Fourth Meeting - Community Center Auditorium 6:30 P.M.
Presentation of survey results.
Modifications and refinement of previous conclusions.
Recommendations for the parks system including
improvements to existing parks and the locations,
acreages and facilities of future parks.
NOVEMBER 27
Fifth Meeting - "The Public Meetingn
City Council Chambers 6:30 P.M.
Condensed presentation of information listed above.
Open format conducive to information exchange.
Obtain public input on goals, objectives and perceived
needs.
DECEMBER 18
Sixth Meeting - "Final"
Community Center Auditorium 6:30 P.M.
Discussion of ways to implement the plan including
funding, priorities, city/school cooperative programs
and other community actions.
JANUARY 21, 1991
Delivery of Draft Report
*City Council Chambers 6:30 P.M.
FEBRUARY 18, 1991
Delivery of Final Product
*City Council Chambers 6:30 P.M.
*Denotes tentative location.
I
J- Q w
I ::J w ...J
Q a.
0 z 0 ~
C Wa:w (\J (\J ex) (\J C\I
I~.- ~oa. 0') 0') 0') m
..J ~u.o T-
- 0 0
::J (.) 0
m w C\Ì
a: m
Ie ~(J) v .Q
-~ <0 0') <0
(.)-J CD 0 T-
-a. V T- 10 T- LO V
en u-a: I + I + I I
w::J
I ...J Coo
...J It)
- 0)
J: en c W
I e ,- W -J
Q a.
Z z 0 C\J
wa:w <0 <0 (C <0
« ::EO a. 10 10 T- 10 LO
::Eu..... T-
...J 0 Lt)
I <.c
J: (.) L6
w
(.) a: LO
-
I c:
J: ~oo 10 .Q ...J
-=> 10 f'- f'- 10 10 -=
t- (.)-J (\J T- ~ C\I
-a. M M T- el)
c: u.a: I + I + I + ~
w=>
I 0 Coo ~
:;
z LJJ 0 0
~
~ en >;
c: :c: (7) c W "'""'"
,.. W 0
II 0 -J >
~ C a. .~
Ll- z 0 u
wa:w 10 10 0 10 10 &
en :EO a. V ~ 0') v v eI)
~ :Eu...q- ~
W 0 m ur
I (.) 0 .¿
z 0 w Lt)" a.> ~
a: ..q- c to)
- ~ ~
...J ......- 0 0
w ~ N
II e C)w 1) "0
ze:> co 0 LO ~ æ
- -e:( 0 (\J CW') (0 0 0') >
::J ....w f'- 10 C\J .¡: ~
~a: T- T- Q.. ~
" x(.) .~ ~
we:(
I ..c: V)
W u
:a ~
--.
" .. 0 z ~ c....
~ 0
« WoO ~
~o¡::: ·ü
I w ...J ....: ::s ~ t:
c: w........ T- C\J T- T- (0 == C1.)
ccn=> T- "0
-~a. æ
(.) :JOe 0
~
« e:><a. -5 bl)
I ~ C1.)
0 60
~ z ò.O
~ ~
c: ~
eI) c)
~ UJ CI) e..> ~
Z ~
I 0 CJ) W ....J u ::s
0 ~ 0
0 0 (!J LUUJ~ ~ to)
¡:: 0 >- a.. <X: 0 ~
< f- CJ~O -5 0
~ ò.O
u :I: Z a: Z(!Jt- 0 0
I, ü: CI: >- :J Z "0 ~
ëñ :J <X:ww ::s u
0 f- a.. ~ u ~
en ~ CI:a:(!J .5 0
< CD Ü --l CI: \0
~ «. ~(!)« 0 --.
..J :r: « C1.)
u 0 O(9UJ c:
CJ Ü UJ CI) -5
~ Ü Z ....J<X:CI: 8 ...
I UJ UJ ::s
a: Cl.. Ü -c 0
< Z --l <X: eI) -5
c. C/) ~ ~
I. .D
I
I
I~.-
Ie
I
tI)
I -J
-J
-
J:
C
I z
<
-J
J:
(.)
I ã:
:I:
t-
a:
I 0
z
a:
0
II u-
ti)
w
z
I ::¡
w
c
-
::)
I "
>
I-
:J
I õ
~
z
0
I ~
w
a:
(.)
I w
c:
I
I,
I
I
.. fñ' ¡ -
0 Q) 3 Q)
f- ....CÞ )( E
CI) Q) 8
:J 1ã. ..S2 ~ a. Q)
0 ii "ë E Q) U
"""-('I') ..- ('I') co co ,.... ~o coQ)
N:J M8 ° C)
C MN MN ...- ...- 0) M ...- .&:. N~
..J ~8 s~ s~ s~ ra
sa sa a a a a a=
:5 MN U)o~ Mëa ra
o - ..- """- ~~ M M co (õ "c:
m ~~ co ('I') ...- 0 NS °0
~ C')0.Q
a: o~ 0,Q ~
:.s "C
~ "C ra
as ..-
~ -
~ CI)
~+ ~ ~Q-
u_ °ë l
;:f) ~~ ~ 0
ot? ~ ~ N ~+8.
4» ::s 0 + "'-:J
"'0- I 8 )( ~
....e- sa aa a a a a aN a~s 0 0
o ::s M Q. ~
4» f) &l)...- 0)(0 ~ ~ ~ M N"'-
0).. ...- ...- ~~ ...- '0 . E
;0 . I I 00
:::. U&l)
It) a: ~
0)
0) ..
,... 0 CI)
....0 ~
"gã. "ë ~
il N~ O)~ ...- ...- ~ -
N...- ...- ...- ...- ...- (0 "'-ëij N ...- ...-
E..- sa sa s s a s aE s a s
E~ CI)
~~ coco 0) 0) ...- ,.... N::. M ~ N
o - NN ...- ...- ...- M N
~:g ...-
a:
~ CI) x
. Q)
- ~ Q.
~+ "ë U)E
.2- ,....
..... . <.9~ ~ N ...- ~ ...- °0 +-
CD ::s +0 + I I "";'"U
"'0- as S.Q S S S .s .s s.~ 0 a
ce-
o ::s ~"':"' 'IIIIt...- N .,. U? t9 0 ~~ N
Qf) ~~ + -+
¡ êi ~oi
CI)
0 a: ~
0)
0)
,... .. CI)
0
....CÞ ~
"iã. co...- u)...- "ë co U1 ~
~¡ ...- ...- ...- ...- 0) 0) &l) ...- ...- ...- ...-
sa as a a a a a g ...- s
~g oco MM U) U) 0) g 0 M ~
o - ('1')...- NN ...- ...- N ...-
!~
ú)
~ Q) Cõ
Q ~ N M Q) Õ S
c S Q) S Õ c 0
= g~:: go)N ,....0 C Q) C
f) ...-C Q) ! Q) 0 0 ...- N
~ Q) Q) Q) Q) !
Q) Q) Q) ~ CI)
~ ~ ~ ...- ~ "lit
...- °Ë N
.
§ 8 8 8 0
§§ §§ § 8 § 0
~1 0 0 0 0
ò o· o· o· &l).
N"It ('1'). L() &l) N &l) C"') &l) C"')
"'0= 66 00 6 6 ¿; 6 0 0 0 0
;8: ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 8 0
0< ~ 0
~~ ...- §. ~. ~. &l).
;::: ~
B B if
0.Q ".Q :;
~ .. (.) (.) ~ 0
~~ ~£ ! U Ci)
ã)Q.. "It Q)
ë:i u:að ~~ ~ã) C\I 0
œ :J~ ~ Q)
LL. = "C .&:.
.... ra.§N =.§N 8~ (5 co ë
0 ~ ~o! fa Q) ~ Q) - ...- ð
-B ~.~ 0
!. Q)- ~ fñ' E Q.. m
S .B .::: 8 .B .::: CI)~ ~ C) r:
~ ~..c 8- ~..c: 8- ª-~ c 0 Q) :; .2
t- :J g 0 0 c:
~ "Q) E æ "Q) E ð.:8 e JQ CI) °ë 8 êã
æ~8 8~8 ",C > ~ .!!l E °ë E ~
"3- ëe c O¡ (5 ~
Æ c8 2 ~ .= ~ t! en " a:
>..
œ
Q..
I.)
>
.=
0=
&
§
u
"'"
c2
I.)
~
o¡:
~
...
~
e
0
"'0
V
~
~
~
GJ
oS
1.)"
u
0=
u
ä
~
~
"'0
...
c2 ~
GJ Cl)
~ «J
05
·ä e
"T;:S
u "T;:S
ta fã
~ Cl)
GJ C
oS :.a
.£ ~
~ Cl)
"'0
GJ
>
~ e
c..
æ 05
c..
"8 "T;:S
fi
~ oõ
.8 c
.c ·ü
c.o ~
.¡;
C GJ
"5 .~
~ ~
fi e
U') c..
~ c..
C «J
::s c"
0
Q .g
"8 «J
00
.c :§
~ oõ
c .5
0
"'0 l:
c -2
::s
~ GJ
>
~ ~
0 .c
-5 ~
~ ëi
ëi k>
=' 5
tI) ao
::s U')
I.) ~
æ õ
CiI:I a;:
"'0 u
Õ >
a;: 0=
I.) 0=
u 8-
"€ E
~ 8
ø:
I
I
I~.-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
U)
-J
-J
J:
c
z
:5
:r:
u
æ
:r:
J-
a:
o
z
a:
o
u.
en
w
t=
:J
(3
if
z
o
~
.. <
Cl)W
wa:
I- (,.>
Ow
za:
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
(.) (/)
=ns
.o.c:
::J 0
c..::3
o 0 .
'; (If 'E
-Q)Q)
.0:-2 E
ns == Q)
==00
~~~
ns-a.
Q) 0 Q)
'- 0 '-
ns.c: '-
0) ~ ~
> 0·-
0.- ns
.o-a.
ns..c Q)
::3,-
"'C c.. --0
$Q)Q)
ø.c: Q)
=...c
ø 0 ..
Q) en
.- 0) -
~Eê
o0a.
~CJ)0
Q) .0
O)ø.c:
(])Q)-
=EñS
° .+= .0
o_ã)
"Oø~
cOen
nsEns
-....0
0C'CS-c
0_ c:
-5gC'CS
ø.c: en
Q)ot:
.c0:J
........0
..$0
a.. '+- en
CD ns·-
-cQ)c
~Øc
u:J.!
r--:
"oQ)Q)0
Q).c:=::2
1::"" '" Q)
0) en .-
=~o'œ
~ m ã> .~
ns....'-t)
CI)~~ ~
-0 .- - 0.
C ~--o Q)
°oc.c
Eu..ns-
.~ -= ~ 'õ
-0 ,'" C =
Q)øo«
.~"gen~
.+= 0 a. c:
Q)E.9ca
~.~ ~ Q.
o "0 ~.~
o~..c-S
CI)"'Q)'+-
..~ '+- > 0
.~ 0 ns en
Ü C:.c Q)
Q).2 >. ~
-= 'ã..~ e-
'+- Q) U ::J
oOenQ.
_x.c'-
«Q)-o
.. ~ .s: ~
fn-en"O
"'D.c-ã).........
G)·~g;cñ
¡¡:~.cQ)"O
"'Coot:
~.æ~·i3È
.Q~ca~~
~ ·E ~ Q.o
as .- - en 0
m Q).92 ns.r:.
=êa~~~
co=c;
.Q ns uj"Ü) g
=-o.enO)
OC~~....
cnn1CDuca
.
..,..
"0)
"O..c
§....
o .
'-0
C)a.
~o
ns-
- CI)
Q.~
~O
...:~
o
oeo
Q..c
C) .'!::
.s ~
E-o
E~ en
.~ '; Q)
ø C) E
~'-ns
ø,]! C)
nsC'CS....
.c:"'C~
l2c:o
==cao
:I:,-~
-cQ)=
cc:ns
ctSO)-B
:E00
oc.E
.- 0
c: .- v
.cñ1....
t::~.E
o 0 0)
ZQ)O
'- ns
.s: C'CS a.
« ..CI)
ü~en
~....ns
-,=::3.c
>-0"
. O_
w en.~
Z .§ ';
O)Q)E
..c:-ca
....C\len
ñSm
~.c
cuã;
en..c
-0::
ã)ns
-+=ø
-0
:æ~
-B"a:
00)
o 0
'+-0
0) 0
>ø
.+= "
.+= c:
Q)ns
0.= >.
E cu.~
o-Bu
(00)
C\lS-S
en Q) c:
.>. ~ =
.~- 0
U'O
~.c:
~~~
....ca.c
c...Q)
Ø)Q)..c
:2Cùê
CD Q) °
u.(j)-o
a....c: c:
CD.... ns
u . ø
u-t:o
°nso
cno....c
~ -c 0
ãi- ø
.Q.!2 Q)
"''+-=ë
o.c:-o
O 0._
LL.ë:E
N
"0
o
.c:
o
o
c:
°
~
cu
....
Q)
--0
C
·Cü
E
0)
....
0)
-5
ür
-t:
ns
0.
~
o
.s:
~
ctS
....
:J
o
u..
¡;
1:
~
o
CJ
G)
fn
8-
a.. .
::J en
.e--g
::::3
:J °
:SO>
C"i
ñS=æ
-C-
O> :3
-.0
ctS ..
o ø
0-0
-c:
0) :J
.... °
ctS '-
øC»
'-~
(])ns
.cëi.
00)
Q)~
.c: -
-:;
"gE
ctS 0)
en >
~ctS
....-C
C'tSø
0.(5
~O
.'!:: .c:
UO
en
.s: Q)
"'C.c: ·
(]):: c:
ñS O.Q
o ñS C\;
o .... 0
-Q)o
0»-
....0)'-
C'tS Cf.) ~
~ J!i 0)
.- 0 c:
u.oo
...r:. CI)
fn 0 ctS
"0(1)-0
C ~ Q)
::Jns-
o-C:
...C::J
C)Q)0
~E(.)
as 0) 0)
i5:ä>Ca
~
"00)-:
Q) .... 0
> ns °
ctS0..c
c.. ~ 0
Q)OCl)
=~..c
E ... 0)
I 0) .-
'-c::I:
Q) .- -c
t:c:c:
nsC:ns
:J:3_
c- c: .c:
« ..2
. ~ c:
~CU"O
'- 0.. c:
[~~
en·-= 0
.-=§~
.s: E 0
~E~
ctSo_
':=ü-o
-oø:"2
~=~
ctS:J:-c
a. .c: c:
ct::~
20-fi
o Z.-
0"'C:
Q)cu.r:.
E~~
~.gz
ø Q. Q)
~Q)-5
~.r:. _
.¡:;.'- C'tS
u.9~
Q)c.o
.c:Q)C'tS
.... Q. ==
.. 0 ~
.!!.~ ns
e=ãg
I-'=ñš
Lñ
Q) e
£ns
ürg
~-5
[CI)
~~
o:f
oS: -g
C'tS
~:E
:;.~
oCJ:
0-æ
en '-
·ë ð
c: '+- .
$J1-g
ð5 ~ .E"
.E (.).2>
0)1: 0
=~en
Q)oñi
~~~
c: ns
Q) :J en
~et:
Q) 0) 5
Q)g~
~-fi~
Cl)0ã)
tñ 5..0
~~~
OQ)'-
.!!-g-ë
c·æ Q)
cE.E
t!e~
uS
I
I City of JXörth Richland Hills
I~.-
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
I'
I
July 26, 1990
Dear Fellow Resident:
Our City is currently engaged in the formation of a Comprehensive Park,
Recreation and Open Space Haster Plan to guide the development of our system
of park and recreational facilities. I"e, the members of the North Richland
Hills Parks and Recreation Board, have been charged with the completion of
this plan by the City Council.
Our understanding of your park and recreation needs. desires and perceptions
is essential to the production of a genuinely workable planning document. In
order that a representative sample (If oplnlons may be inco:rporated into this
planning process, we encourage you to take the time to complete the
accompanying survey form.
All your responses will be kept in confidence and used only for the purpose
of assessing facility and progrmruning demands. We are working wiLhin a
limited time frame to complete this plan. Therefore. your response to this
survey before August 31, 1990 would be greatly appreciated.
Please be assured that your opinions will play a major role in the successful
completion of this Plan.
For your convenience, \ve have designed the survey form for ease of return
mailing. Please detach the perforated survey form and place it in the mail
at your earliest opportunity.
Thank you for your cooperation with this effort and we look forward to
serving your parks and recreational needs..
Sincerely,
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD
Don Tipps, Chairman
Robert L. Fenimore
Stlaron Battles
Oscar Trevino
Ron Parks, Vice Chairman
J. Douglass Davis
Bobbie Lanlbert
Karen Allen
(817) 281-0041
· 7301 N.E. lOOP 820
· P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180
I
I
le.-
Ie
I
I
I
I d; .
c".-,c.c·
;:::. '.
·c·.·
I· : ......
(. 'cc.'·
.:\:
<'
"
~.......~
- .
I
"
)
I
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ::::::1
:i!!!!!!!!!!¡!!!¡!!!!!!!!!!!!I~~ co L LEY V I LLE
.' 'N' ·0' 'R' . T· H' -:-:':-:-:-:-:-:-:-:':':':-:':-. ..,~ ~
\~ICHL~:4tSâtC:::::~~+W 0
~. ·····················)<:}A<:>}>}}~· 1. i ì : : ! t r· t~. g
w
Z
..J
C '- ______u____ ~µj. .=Þ3.. ~
~::=:::=:====-=-::::===:=:====:=-; r ~: ~ i:\}}} ~,
;: --~~-----:]:, r-""'...........
i i~~II~~i~i~I~~~~lli!I!lil!I!I!I!lilil!I!I!I!:
WATAUGA ___u__ \\,~ ·.......0..........
...:
c..c.,...:.·:::
:,<{( .,.,,}/, "'.',. ",.,.". ,"", < :iiii}}ifir?\~:~" A
,',' · ',0 :,<'ß.>, "", :.:.:.:.: -:.:.:-:.:.:.' ~,.
;.):::/:: :::-:::} ::::::::::::::::::.' ~
.·c.·.:. ~ ::: <:-::.::. -:-:':-:':-:-:-:'. .
' "" .... ~...:.:-: .;./820 .:::::::0:-... .i ""'« }t}~::::··
<c. ~ ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¡~:'.. .....:A
" ;} ~~!!!!!! j!!I:: j j:!! j! 1¡ i: 1 ¡ ¡: I!:! I!'!!! I'I! I'I':!'!:! ¡! ¡ ¡i ¡: ¡! ¡ i ¡! ¡ ¡ ::;.::::. :)< :: ~~ ~ <t
<', ",f~<i:'iY t!:: ¡ j! ~ II!:! ¡::' ¡' ¡ ¡ ~ 1:1 ¡'. i:.::!!:: ¡ ¡ i ¡::::::::.. B I ~ ~ ~~ NO 1 2 1 ""
HALTOM' '¡¡¡¡!:::::::}};.,.
. C I T Y -..;...
~
~~
r ~
".
KELLER
~
.
'I t-
i I
.c .'
"':. ."
.,,;,::, :
.c·"'::.. c':'
.~:.'; . ··,c..,c·>
.......... .d<
'':',:
::
"c
.': 'HU ~\~fl~ISi~~:::".!:.,.:::: '.:
,','.:. '., c'.:;:,
'c' \':
.:\ .·r:
";'A~~~6'~T " ¡~llti~r~!
'!I ,¡¿ I: '" --:., ,c. ,','", "ÎrJ
......' fð ~':!. -.: ,.
.-. ·:··,·.·····:.c:
<. .'
:~
:: :
.:: ,'.
I
.
':d.
.....
I
,.d,
. ,....
::.:.':".:
. d:"C"';--~
':.i::
.~
....:. :¡
": .~
...". .:~
...,
.p:"
,:0 '·:.:"""d'.
..'
::/.:.,:
I
. ';':' .....,
"" :.
".
I
\'2.\
j
~
i
f
1
. . ~
: .;
;,
~
..
f
"1
.,
..
,
, .j
I
J
.,
I
PLANNING SECTORS
I,
I .
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
COMPREHENSIVE PARK MASTER PLAN
. 'J
J
,
, j
I
I
f.-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
II
il
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
PARK AND RECREATION SURVEY
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MASTER PARK PLAN
Please indicate in which of the following planning sectors you reside (refer to the
accompanying planning sector map of the City.)
Sector A
Sector B
Sector C
Sector D
_ Sector E
Sector F
Sector G
Question 1:
What types of recreational activities have you or your family participated in within the past
year?
Basketball
Soccer
Bicycling
Swimming
Horseback Riding
Racquetball
Camping
Volleyball
Baseball
Walking
Golf
Picnicking
Nature Study
FiÐness/VVelLness
Backpacking
Other
Softball
Jogging
Tennis
Fishing
Arts & Crafts
Trave1(fours
Wilderness Trips
Question 2:
Where do you or your family presently pursue the majority of these activities?
Public facility in North Richland Hills
your subdivision
Private facility (YMCA, Health Clubs)
Church or School facility
Public facility outside of North Richland Hills
Question 3:
Would you like to see the City and the Birdville Independent School District share
facilities for recreation programs and activities?
_ Yes
_ No
Question 4:
Do you desire more parks, open space and recreational facilities in North Richland I-fills?
_ Yes
_ No
I
I
.
I .-.
.. :~
'e
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
Question 5:
What additional park and recreation facilities would you like to have in the City of Nonh
Richland Hills?
· (Please number by preference lour first five choices, afterwards check all that apply)
.
Tennis Centers
Golf Courses
Outdoor Swimming Pools
Recreation Centers
Nature Areas & Trails
Softball Fields
Basketball Couns
Picnicking Areas
Volleyball Courts
Perfonning Arts Facilities
Racquetball Courts
Teen Recreation Centers
GazeboslPa vilions
Multi-spons Complexes
Equestrian Facilities
Hike and Bike Trails
Indoor Swimming Pools
Senior Citizen Centers
Baseball Fields
Soccer Fields
Playgrounds
ExerciselFitness Courses
Football Fields
Cultural Arts Facilities
Amphitheaters
Sand Volleyball Courts
Handicap Playgrounds
Other
Question 6:
What quality level of facility construction would you support?
First class _ Mid-range
- Basic functional
Question 7:
Do you feel the City should:
a. Put more funding into parks and recreation improvements?
b. Continue the same level of funding?
c. Decrease the CUITent level of funding?
d. No opinion
Question 8:
If you favor more funding, would you like this to be accomplished by:
(Check all that apply)
a. User fees?
b. Increasing taxes?
c. Supporting a Parks Capital Improvements Bond Program?
d. Requiring that a park development fee for the acquisition
and improvement of park land be collected from developers
who wish to construct residential subdivisions?
I
I
f.-
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
Question 9:
How do you currently travel to places of recreation in North Richland Hills?
Auto _ Bicycle
_ Walking
Question 10:
How would you prefer, given the option, to travel to places of recreation in North Richland
Hills?
- Auto _ Bicycle
_ Walking
Question 11:
How should creeks and their flood plains be used?
(Check all that apply)
a. Be left in their natural state, with no development
b. As linkage parks and buffers between residential neighborhoods
and other land uses
c. For running, biking, hiking and nature trails with restrooms,
drinking fountains, etc.
d. As practice spons fields where feasible
e. Other (please specify)
Question 12:
Are you currently a member (participant) of a local Spons Association?
Yes
_ No
Assoc. Name:
Question 13:
What are the best days for recreational programs to be offered to you or your family?
- Monday through Friday
_ Weekends
_ Both
Question 14:
What is the best time for recreational programs to be offered to you or your family?
Mornings
_ Afternoons
_ Evenings
Other (please specify
)
I
I
f· .-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
II
1
I
I
I
I
I
I,
1
I
Question 15:
The following series of statements are intended to identify your opinions concerning parks
and recreation issues. Please respond by circling the most appropriate answer.
a. The park and recreation facilities near my home are adequate.
(Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree)
b. Neighborhood parks and schools should be adjacent wherever possible.
(Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree)
c. More neighborhood parks are needed.
(Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree)
d. Residential neighborhoods should be interconnected with trails and park sites
throughout the City and between adjacent cities, wherever possible.
(Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree)
e. Parks should be developed along with residential subdivisions.
(Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree)
f. Parks and recreation facilities are well worth their cost to taxpayers.
(Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree)
g. Recreation program fees are appropriate for the quality of services received.
(Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree)
h. The revenues generated from recreation and athletic program fees should be
specifically used to support those programs.
(Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree)
i. Users should assume more of the costs of providing recreation services and
facilities.
(Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree)
J. Most citizens are well infonned about parks and recreational opportunities
in North Richland Hills.
(Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree)
J. The possibility of developing "After School" or "Latch Key" programs in
cooperation with the Birdville Independent School District should be
explored.
(Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree)
Question 16:
Check those park and recreation sites you or someone in your household have used within
the past year.
Fossil Creek Park
N orich Park
Recreation Center
Ironhorse Golf Course
Richfield Park
N orthfield Park
Senior Center
North Hills Medical Center Park
I
I
f..-
Ie
I
I
1
I
1
I'
1
!
I
1
I
1
I
I,
I
I
Question 17:
Concerning the aforementioned park and recreation sites. please check the following
facilities you or members of your family have used in the past year.
Playgrounds
Fitness Courses
Adult Sports Fields
Youth Sports )Fields
GazeboslPa vilions
Recreation Center
Basketball Courts
Tennis Courts
Picnic Areas
Sand Volleyball Courts
Natural Areasffrails
Senior Citizens Center
Question 18:
How would you rate the maintenance of the park facilities you have used?
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
Question 19:
How would you rate the quality of recreation programs offered by the City?
Excellent
_ Good
Fair
_ Poor
Comments:
Question 20:
How would you rate the quality of customer service for the following areas?
Recreation Center:
Senior Center:
Adult Athletic Programs:
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair
Poor
Poor
Poor
Comments:
Question 21:
Check all age groups In your household that have participated in Parks and Recreation
Department programs.
2-3 years
4- 5 years
6-11 years
12-17 years
18-55 years
55 + years
Question 22:
How have you been infonned of park and recreation programs and facilities?
"Leisure Celebration" Brochure
"Word of Mouth"
Electronic Message Board
Newspaper
Public Service Announcement
Other (specify )
I
I
~.-
Ie
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
-
Question 23:
What is the single most important issue or need concerning North Richland Hills parks and
recreation programs and facilities? (Please attach additional sheets if necessary)
Question 24:
How long have you lived in North Richland Hills?
_ less than 1 year
- 1 to 5 years _ more than 5 years
Question 25:
How many registered voters are in your household?
Question 26:
Indicate the number of members in your household by the following age groups.
o - 5 years
6 - 12
13 - 19
_ 20 - 35
36 - 49
50 +
Question 27:
What is the highest level of education that you have completed?
Elementary School
- Post Graduate Degree
High School _ 4 Year College Degree
Question 28:
What is your family's total income per year?
. .
a.
b.
c.
d.
under $15,000
$15,001 to $30,000
$30,001 to $55,000
$55,001 to $70,000
e.
f.
g.
$70,001 to $90,000
$90,001 to $120,000
over $120,001
N an1e
(optional)
Thank you for taking time from your busy schedule to assist in guiding the future
development of North Richland Hills' parks and recreation system. (please feel free to
attach any further comments on additional sheets of paper).
I
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 24, 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting to order September 24, 1990, at 7:30 p.m.
Present:
Tommy Brown
Mack Garvin
Lyle E. Welch
Charles Scoma
Byron Sibbet
Linda Spurlock
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
C.A. Sanford
Jeanette Rewis
Greg Dickens
Absent:
Richard Davis
Prank Metts, Jr.
C.A. Sanford
Rex McEntire
Councilman Sibbet gave the invocation.
2.
ROLL CALL
Mayor
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
City Engineer
Mayor Pro Tern
Councilman
Assistant City Manager
Attorney
3.
INVOCATION
4.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 10, 1990
APPROVED
Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the minutes of
the September 10, 1990 meeting.
Motion carried 4-0; Councilman Welch abstaining due to absence from the meeting.
I
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
.
September 24, 1990
Page 2
5.
PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
1. STATUS REPORT ON TOWN HALL COMMITIEE - PHIL RIEKE
Mr. Phil Rieke, Chairman of the Town Hall Committee, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Rieke gave the Council a report on the survey that was sent to the citizens of North
Richland hills. Mr. Rieke advised that the first Town Hall Meeting would be held
October 16, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. at the Park and Recreation Center.
2. YARD OF THE MONTH AWARDS FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER
Mayor Brown, Kathy Robinson, Jane Dunkelberg, and Alice Scoma of the
Beautification Committee presented the following September "Yard of the Month"
awards: Mark and Sandy Norenberg, 7708 John Autrey; Billy and Mary Glasgow, 6537
Riddle Drive; Russell and Becky Neely, 4520 Diamond Loch North; Clarence and Bettie
Evans, 7200 Harwick Lane; Joseph and Katy O'Donnell, 7500 Mike Court; and Harvey
Greenwald Family, 5016 Strummmer.
3. LANDSCAPE OF THE MONTH FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER
Mayor Brown, Kathy Robinson, Jane Dunkelberg and Alice Scoma presented the
following September "Landscape of the Month" awards: North Fort Worth Bank, 6700
Industrial Park Boulevard; and Jack-in-the-Box, 6501 Grapevine Highway.
6.
PRESENTATION OF TEXAS AMATEUR ATHLETIC FEDERATION
MEMBER CITY AWARD TO PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Mayor Brown presented to Jim Browne, Director of Parks and Recreation, the Texas
Amateur Athletic Federation Member City Award.
Mayor Brown recognized Boy Scout Troop #327.
7.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION TO
DWAINE GREENE, PASTOR BIRDVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH
Reverend Greene was not present.
I
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 24, 1990
Page 3
8.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
Councilman Scoma removed Items No. 12 and 14 from the Consent Agenda.
9.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, & 26)
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the Consent
Agenda.
Motion carried 5-0.
10.
PS 90-21 REQUEST OF GARY B. STARNES AND JAMES M.
STARNES FOR FINAL PLAT OF ORANGE VALLEY ADDITION
(LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF STARNES ROAD
AND DOUGLAS LANE)
POSTPONED
Mr. Dick Perkins, representing the owners, appeared before the Council speaking in
favor of the request.
Mter discussion, Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman We1ch, to
postpone PS 90-21 until the October 8, 1990 meeting.
Motion carried 4-1; Councilmen Garvin, Welch, Scoma and Sibbet voting for and
Councilwoman Spurlock voting against.
11.
PS 90-22 REQUEST OF JAMES R. HARRIS WITH SHADY OAKS
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR FINAL PLAT OF SHADY OAKS
ADDITION (LOCATED WEST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND NORTH
OF NORTH TARRANT PARKWAY)
APPROVED
Mr. Doug Long, Engineer, appeared before the Council representing the owners
speaking in favor of the request.
Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve PS 90-22.
I
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
-
September 24, 1990
Page 4
Mer discussion, Councilman Scoma withdrew his motion and Councilman Garvin
withdrew his second.
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Scoma, to approve PS 90-22 as
recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission with special emphasis on Items
No. 14, 15, 16 and 30 of the Engineer's Letter dated September 4, 1990.
Motion carried 5-0.
12.
GN 90-138 EMPLOYEES WHO ARE CALLED TO ACTIVE DUTY
IN THE ARMED FORCES _
ORDINANCE NO. 1691
APPROVED
Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No.
1691 with the following change to the third paragraph, first and second sentence to read
"Whereas, as a result of the above national crisis, the City Council has determined...".
Motion carried 4-1; Councilwoman Spurlock, Councilmen Garvin, Sibbet, and Welch
voting for and Councilman Scoma voting against.
13.
GN 90-139 APPOINTMENTS TO CML SERVICE COMMISSION
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve GN 90-139.
Motion carried 5-0.
There were questions concerning the one, two and three year terms and it was suggested
that the Council hold a work session on the terms of the Civil Service Commission.
14.
GN 90-140 INVESTMENT POLICY - AMENDMENT I
TABLED
Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to table GN 90-140.
Staff was requested to check (1) the nature of Texas Treasurey Safekeeping Trust Co.;
(2) if the Company was a certified State of Texas Security Commission; (3) if it has been
certified as an NASD & SEC Broker; and (4) define legally whether or not Tex Pool is,
through its functions, identified as a broker.
I
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 24, 1990
Page 5
Motion carried 5-0.
*15.
GN 90-141 PROPOSED WRITE-OFF DELINQUENT PERSONAL
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNTS
APPROVED
16.
GN 90-142 APPOINTMENTS TO TEEN COURT ADVISORY BOARD
APPROVED
Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve GN 90-142.
Motion carried 5-0.
*17.
PU 90-40 PURCHASE OF EXPLOSIVE DEVICES SAFETY EQUIPMENT
APPROVED
*18.
PU 90-41 SALE OF CITY PROPERTY _
LOT lR, BLOCK C, SMITHFIELD ADDITION
APPROVED
*19.
PU 90-42 AUTHORIZATION TO REAPPROPRIATE FUNDS
TO PURCHASE COMPUTER HARDWARE
APPROVED
*20.
PU 90-43 AWARD OF BID TO LIND PAPER COMPANY
FOR ANNUAL PAPER SUPPLY CONTRACT
APPROVED
*21.
PU 90-44 EXTENSION OF UNIFORM CLEANING SERVICES
WITH RlCDIAND CLEANERS FOR AN ADDITIONAL YEAR
APPROVED
*22.
PU 90-45 AWARD OF BID TO DICK SMITH, INC.
FOR ANNUAL AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND SUPPLIES CONTRACT
APPROVED
I
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 24, 1990
Page 6
*23.
PU 90-46 CANCELLATION OF CONTRACT WITH
RIGGS FIRST LINE EQUIPMENT AND AWARD BID
TO CASCO, INC. FOR AIR COMPRESSOR
APPROVED
24.
PW 90-41 AWARD OF BID ON WATAUGA ROAD MEDIAN
IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING (TABLED AT THE
AUGUST 27TH, 1990 MEETING)
RE.JECTED
Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to reject the bid of
Phillips Lawn Co. and authorize the City to take separate bids on the landscaping and
sprinkler system.
Motion carried 5-0.
*25.
PAY 90-18 APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.3
IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,250.00 TO MAR WELL CONSTRUCTION,
INC. FOR OLD WATAUGA ROAD @ PRICE DRIVE _
PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
*26.
PAY 90-19 AUTHORIZED PAYMENT TO DICTAPHONE
CORPORATION FOR THE REPAIR OF THE DICTAPHONE
RECORDING SYSTEM
APPROVED
27.
CITIZENS PRESENTATION
Mr. Dan Echols, 5016 Nevada, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Echols spoke in reference to a newspaper article pertaining to proposed fees for
drainage projects.
Mrs. Myrtis Byrd, 7312 Hialeah Circle, appeared before the Council.
Mrs. Byrd expressed concern on the increased vandalism rate in her neighborhood.
I
Ie
I -
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 24, 1990
Page 7
The Police Department will check on reported vandalism in the area.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to adjourn the
meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
Tommy Brown - Mayor
A1TEST:
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I a>epartment:
~ Public Hearing for request of Keith and Jo Ellen
I Subject:
I
I
I
I
I
Community Development
10/8/90
Council Meeting Date:
PZ 90-14
Agenda Number:
Anderson to rezone a portion of Tract 3D, T. K.
Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from its present
classification of AG Agriculture to R-1 Single
Family. This property is located on the east
side of Crane Road, south of Amundson Road.
Ordinance 111693
Mr. & Mrs. Keith Anderson own a .48 acre tract of land on the east side of Crane Road,
approximately 1,100 feet south from its intersection with Amundson Road. The owners are
requesting a zone change from AG (Agriculture) to R-1 (Residential).
All adjacent properties are currently zoned either R-1 or R-2. Portions of the land
directly across the street on the west of Crane Road is currently zoned Agriculture
District.
I
The Planning and Zoning Commission approved this request for a zone change at their
September 13, 1990 meeting. There were no objections from citizens regarding the zone
change.
RECOMMENDATION:
II 4IÞ1t is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider
the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
14IÞ
I
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
er
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
LIP
~ /)
e;; . ¿¿/ '.
,I' (
-~
I . City M~nager
. Finance Director
rtment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of 1
A-G
C-I
1581
I-I
AG
I-I
1564
I I
/ ,I
, I
I '
\'
\
\ , 1-,
\ , su
\ "
\ \
\~
\ ,FJ?
, !
I-I
*'524
AG
0-1
1639
·
I Page 6
P & Z Minutes
1_ September 13, 1990
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie 6. PZ 90-14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie PZ 90-14
APPROVED
I
Chairman Wood stated their deed
restrictions most likely would
allow commercial activity.
Mr. Bowen said e was a paper
passed around ng you could fill
out a form pay $300 and get a
zonin nge, he would like to see
it e said you can apply, but that
s only a request.
Mr. Lueck said if that is all you had
to do, there would be no need for him
to be sitting up there wasting his
time.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to deny
PZ 90-13. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Collins and the motion to deny
carried 7-0.
Public Hearing for request of Keith &
Jo Ellen Anderson to rezone a portion
of Tract 3D, T.K. Martin Survey,
Abstract 1055, from its present
classification of AG Agriculture to
R-l Single Family. This property is
located on the east side of Crane Road
south of Amundson Road.
Chairman Wood opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Mrs. Anderson came forward. She said
they wish to build a single family
dwelling on this property.
Chairman Wood called for anyone
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve
PZ 90-14. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Brock and the motion carried 7-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1693
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHL~~
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-90-14 the following described property shall
be rezoned from AG to R-1.
BEING a tract of land out of the T. K. Martin Survey in Tarrant County,
Texas, and described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron pin at the intersection of the east line of Crane Road
with the south line of a 60 foot road, being 50 feet east and 89 feet north
of the southeast corner of Lot 1, Dawn Ann King Addition to the City of
Smithfield, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-M, Page 105,
Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE East with the south line of said 60 foot road at 190.0 feet an iron
pin, in all 210.0 feet to an iron pin;
THENCE South 100 feet to an iron pin;
THENCE West at 90 feet an iron pin, in all 210.0 feet to an iron pin in the
east line of said Crane Road;
THENCE North with said east line 100 feet to the place of beginning and
containing 0.4821 acres of land, more or less.
This property is located on the east side of Crane Road, south of Amundson
Road.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
:1
!I
Page 2
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF SEPTEMBER,
1990.
~~
CHAI
SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-90-14 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1990.
ATTEST:
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
I
_f
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I COIIII11'ini ty Development
aPpartment:
~ Request of Gary B. Starnes and James M. Starnes
Su~ject:
9/24/90
Council Meeting Date:
PS 90-21
Agenda Number:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
for Final Plat of Orange Valley Addition. This
property is located at the northeast corner of
Starnes Road and Douglas Lane.
Mr. Gary Starnes and James Starnes have submitted a Final Plat, for a 10 acre subdivision
at the northeast corner of Starnes Road and Douglas Lane. The proposed single family
residential subdivision is zoned R-2 and contains 33 lots. The Final Plat was approved
by the Planning and Zoning Commission subject to the engineer's comments at ,the
September 13th, 1990 meeting. The applicants have agreed to the camments.
The Planning and Zoning CODDI1ission expressed conc:ern regarding the absence of an
easement across the adjacent six acre tract to the east to accommodate upstream runoff
(see attached minutes of P & Z meeting). Members of the P & Z felt that some effort be
made on behalf of the owner to improve drainage in the area· on land that he owned, but
not included as a part of the Final Plat. The owner and developer agreed to perform
same drainage improveaents and have submitted a drainage plan outlining the proposed
improvements. The drainage plan for the Orange Valley Subdivision and the adjacent six
acre tract includes details for the following:
1. Breeching the dam of the small stock tank on the adjacent six acre tract.
2. Shaping an earthern swale through the six acre tract to handle upstream
runoff water.
3. Delineating the limit of the 100 year flood area which was not available on
other flood maps.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
I
I Source of Funds:
_ Bonds (GO/Rev.)
I ~ op. eratlng Budget
Other 't '
~~ -~~ elf1/~·
,. artment Head Signature I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. Fin.... 0keCt0r
Page 1 of
-
I .' ~.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
''ill'':!
II' \.1/ -if!...... ~ '
~_l:~ R 2 AG ".y~~iJ
--._ _ r-
~I SI I I ~~iiii
. Igl I . _ I.-¿ / TI ·
~ ~ f' ~ ~J.)ff-
~ - 5 ~ I , . ~ ~A~ R-~ II
¡¡_ ~~7!T II~Z r
~ I r -¡OLL.l~ 1 tl"l, .L J I r
:1 :~.... · I r T L~ I I I ~r
II 1-- "I 1 '"ï' I 1
-- II I Î~ T -1' þ ~
~ ' I leT 1;~[ ~Jt:;f;
'i ~ 1 I ~L I I '. '----1+
3Iuo,,", 0" '0;'
~. .1 -"J.L-~~
_I :J,I~ \:::UJJ¡I> 1 _ _ 0 >- '- - tii :
b ~RNlli' I ' I 11 = ~¡::: - ,...:: !,R-2
B l~ - ~ - - · 1558
'11 1 - ~ II r-"
~ ..L _~!
I ~ - 1 \ \ \,. T I 'I '"41092
~1.uiJ·~~ ~~~~
~,@~ u ~==urrT' ~
11' ' ~:8~ I I I I_ ~-f-2J
-~ 8:=~ - 13Z
~I:~ ~=~ · ~~W=
~ =:J't-1 ,\" __
;1 '~~ ", F~ ~~
~I ~~~1~r:Tt~ ~:
~ f-:¡ l ~fot . -H;~.==
, I" Ira I .... "0.- - io-o- _ -
~~ __;==i__:li-
I =:==~--¡=
-;----i ~-
-¡- /TTTl =
AG
R-3
1385
AG
R-2
1125
-
~
~
'. -
R-2
145'-
--
4 ___ ___.
-- ._"-"'-
-
R-2
1109
'-
0-2
~425
\ '\
C-2
C-2-
1521-
R-8- 1500
R-2
1455
R·,
~625
1434
~~-
R-~-'800 ~
,.3~
: : : :~ : ! : --- --~ - ;.....------
I : : :: : j , ~:IIIII III"""'" ~ - -
: : : ~ ¡ ¡ l_,L;:::; == ~~ :: = :
: : : : ~-'¡'::-"; = =- ~-- ~- - R-2
J _;___.l_-.J ",-, \ - 1435
-..fQ!t.1ïftU~- - - Î\ \ \ \ =
: ~~C!._\~.~>" \ _L- - ~- v ~ - : ~ -
I ¡ 1153 "",'~_-"-- = -: .- =- ....
: ;_______~\ \__------ ~ ~~ ~_ 'I~""''' rL
I t 1 I ;¡~ ~-
---.L---L..-í-----___~: 1---
: eL-------- __ rm¡a¡: 111_
~-------~ '- --
I ~----,--- ~ ~- ~- .- - ~ .......
:-:rf'U ......--ï--~ ~----~--- ~ =- ~- - - -ji!';I.iK']n
: : : '"-- ~ - - - l1 ~~ )::-¡- ..?
11 I -~ ....... - / ~ ~/l --~- ..
T ~...... -~~
'\J I I(r'r" , v
\. . 'A I ""11 I ~ \-
.;' r-. L (\1 ~ - R _I ..j. '>4
"'-1 r r\~.... - )~'
±, i'" ".lh'1 r~~~U" -= I I I T
J I I Cv' "'l_,~,.l Y ¿ ---'--r--~. a. r-
UIPIIU ~ ~~ I I ~
I , I I i I ~ :::=~ _~:::
~i _~:::
~ ('~ --
i-- __ ,--_ ........
R - 2 '- -- __ ...--"" /- r-
1314 = =z ø trI I.... r--r f- = ::
- -- ""'\'i -- f-
- -~ ,\\... - --
!iij ~.,.,."... -~ 'I' -
m.L:.' ---~
=.. , ;-:i:v ~-ld
- '. r--' .g- A . I AG
= --_ _ P.II' 01
- --"--..j --"-" =~ - ~
· ~ l I: .' L-qm,~ ~In ., ,I j'''¡ u; w v
~ .¿J _I ill/ · ~
- '~1. ~ 11
~ U .... G'" "rJWJ '/ rill '/ '-
I III I ~J '"""-~ II I
R 2 ~ \J I r / f-J'- _J. ~œø:.... In R-3 AlÞ
12;1 ~ I-{ 1IaJ.~) --..... -- ...- ~ L II II ,
-=- '- / ,..~ = -~ '- ~
~::: ~..,- 1£-'11 - t- C-IrJ .~'~
- - ~It j 1~Z:.y mr;::: '.::ì C-2
ß , I ~ ~ I I I I lð~ 34 I - 2 I
:~
c- =--. ʣ
,R-2
1615
"
..J
AG
"'-
Go. ......
VAL ;
~\
R-2
1115
I
I AG I
lit
R-2
1529
,f,~jj':~." .
.
0-
--I--
-~ f-
......L ~ __ ¡---r- -
== =- -+- :: R-a
- _P-- ¡¡t;:¡:¡ ~ 1507
AG ~ =~ -~ ::
=!=~ ::;~ ~ I , ~
-- '{- ~
I I ~
- ~~ -~- ~ 1. I ~
. _ ._~ f- ",,"1 ---= ~
= ~H -~ ~ I ¡ U J~ I l ~ '
~ _v I- I r'I !"N'va T 11 I TT
4~~~Øj,,--= \ lti · ~;
:::f/- ~G....P11 I 1-:::tI'Π====
T)-- ~~ I ~~:r1; ~ ==~
'1 - ---..~ r..-.....¡ ~~ ~ttD _~
- :II - I- ~- --
- .........~_ ~J Iftfr I- ~- --
~ ?J- ~_A'f'ET~ ~:i
CTY =[- I ~ ~ ==~
ì""'\. . - _ _ -"""'---
J.->í = H I - = ~- t::::=
~~ Sf l~Jm r m
-
C-I
\ U
\1415
1- _
I~ it ~ ~
-"]'t'-
~- ~I=
~==
- f0-
r,
J
~I :wo
l
~
il "\ ~
..
I~ '
I
C
. :,v I
~---J
M
AG
c
-
.J.2.ß
JtR-1
1 L
11
~
11
.
I
ì
\1
I
A~
I
Page 2
Ie P & Z Minutes
September 13, 1990
I
1. PS 90-20
I
I
I
I 2. PS 90-21
I TABLED 8/23/90
I PS 90-21
APPROVED/STIPULATION
Ie
I
I
I 3. PS 90-22
I
I PS 90-22
APPROVED/STIPULATIONS
I
I
Ie
I
Request of Gary B. Starnes and
M. Starnes for revised P nary
Plat of Orange Val dition. This
property is ed at the northeast
corne tames Road and Douglas
Mr. Barfield made the motion to
approve PS 90-20 subject to the
Engineer's comments. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion
carried 7-0.
Request of Gary B. Starnes and James
M. Starnes for Final Plat of Orange
Valley Addition. This property is
located at the northeast corner of
Starnes Road and Douglas Lane.
Mr. Brock made the motion to approve
subject to the engineer's comments.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen
and the motion carried 7-0.
Mr. Barfield said he would like to
request a letter be sent to the City
Council conveying the P & Z's thoughts
regarding an easement on the 6 acre
tract and the breachment for the dam,
if necessary.
Request of James R. Harris with Shady
Oaks Development Corporation for Fin
Plat of Shady Oaks Addition. T
property is located west
Boulevard and north orth
Parkway.
en made the motion to approve
S 90-22 subject to the engineer's
comments with the exception of numbers
17 and 18 and with the addition that
the sewer stub-out be extended to the
north city limit line. This motion
was seconded by Mr. Brock and the
motion carried 7-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
817 336-5773
ø~ cT~1}Cflj17 T 1'f":~L A'iI? G~ENR!'!!f~
September 11, 1990
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: Orange Valley
Final Plat & Construction Plans
PS 90-21
Dear Commission Members:
We are in receipt of the review letter for the subject subdivision from your
engineer, and we are in agreement with complying with each of the comments
itemized in his letter dated September 7, 1990. We will plan to make all of
the revisions itemized in this letter prior to final approval by the City
Council on September 24, 1990.
We will be present at your meeting on September 13, 1990, to discuss the
details of any of the items in the engineer's letter.
Very truly yours,
TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC.
~.~Q~
J
ichard Perkins, P.E.
JRP/kfs
cc: Mr. Alan Hamm
915 Florence Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
I
I _ City of X>rth Richland Hills
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 7, 1990
Ref: PWM 90-115
MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: John A. Johnston, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Orange Valley Addition
Final Plat & Construction Plans
PS 90-21
We have reviewed the second submittal of the subject documents received in our
office on August 31, 1990, and offer the following comments.
Final Plat:
1. The current ownership of the 6.0 acre tract to the west of this property
should be shown correctly on the plat.
Water, Sewer and Drainage Improvements:
Water Layout:
2. The 8" water valve at the intersection of Market Court and Orange Valley
Drive should be moved to the southside of the 8" x 6" tee as shown on
the markup.
Sewer Layout:
3. The note referring to extra strength vitrified clay pipe should be
removed.
Offsite Sewer:
4. The profile should show the approximate location of the 16" waterline
and gas line.
Sewer Profiles:
5. The existing ground line should be added to all sewer profiles.
(817) 281-0041
· 7301 N.E. LOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Sewer Details:
6. The "street Replacement Detail" should be modified as shown in the
marked-up sheet to show the limit of the cushion sand.
Drainage Layout:
7.
The flow arrows and drainage area dividing lines should be modified as
shown on the marked-up sheet.
8.
An additional grading plan should be included with the next submittal to
show the extent of work to be done to breach the pond dam. The grading
plan should also show the grading and shaping of the 6.0 acre tract to
drain to the existing 10' x 6' box culvert.
storm Drain Line "A":
9.
The existing ground line should be added to the profile.
10.
The height of the curb on the concrete flume should be clearly shown as
6".
Paving Improvements:
Orange Valley Drive:
11. The grades should be adjusted to calculate the 0.5% minimum grade as
shown in the profile.
street Paving Details:
12.
The 30" smooth dowell bar should be shown to be greased prior to pouring
of valley gutter.
The marked-up plans given to the engineer should be returned with his next
submittal.
The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer
of his responsibility to proved adequate, accurate, and buildable construction
plans. The City's eventual approval of the construction plans will not
signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for
the engineering in the bid documents.
cc: Gregory W. Dickens, Director of Public Works/utilities
Barry LeBaron, Director of Community Development
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
Ie
I
817 336-5773
~Ð TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS
...~c CONSULTING ENGINEERS
August 31, 1990
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: Orange Valley - Preliminary Plat,
Final Plat & Construction Plans
PS 90-21
Dear Commission Members:
In accordance with your instructions at our meeting on August 23, 1990, we
are enclosing the preliminary plat for the subject subdivision indicating the
addition of the 6-acre tract owned by Gary and Jim Starnes which was omitted
from the original preliminary plat submittal. The 2-acre tract at the
northwest corner of this property is only owned by Gary Starnes, and
therefore, has been omitted from this preliminary plat submittal.
In addition, we have enclosed a preliminary water layout, sewer layout, and
drainage layout for the entire 16-acre parcel for your review.
We are also enclosing the revised final plat and revised construction plans
that address all of the comments covered in the letter from your engineer to
our firm dated August 15, 1990. Therefore, we would respectfully request the
approval of the preliminary plat for the 16-acre parcel and the final plat
and construction plans for the 10-acre tract at your regularly scheduled
meeting of September 13, 1990. Should you have any questions concerning
these submittals in the meantime, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC.
~,~
JRP/kfs
Enclosures
P.E.
cc: Mr. Alan Hamm
915 Florence Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
I Page 2
p & Z Minutes
1_ August 23, 1990
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I PS 90-17
APPROVED
I
I 2. PS 90-20
Ie
I
Chairman Wood stated that the
Commission appreciates them
reconsidering the layout. He sai
thinks they have solved the pro em
eliminating the lots facing 0 the
major thoroughfare, Univers· y Drive.
Mr. Long said some engineer's
comments would not ap y since they
made the change in e layout. He
said he talked wi Kevin Miller and
roblems with the
revised layou. Mr. Long said that
Kevin had s e problem with leaving
pieces of ots in the old Cherokee
Estates 0 they have agreed to bring
at on the pieces of lots south
is plat.
Barfield said at the work session
Mr. Long was concerned that by turning
Colgate Court, he might want to run
some drainage down the drives of two
or three lots.
Mr. Long said he did not think he
would have to do that, but he might
have to cut University Drive a little
deeper.
Chairman Wood called for anyone
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Angle made the motion to approve
PS 90-17. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Brock and the motion carried 6-0.
Chairman Wood said the next two
requests would be heard together, but
voted on separately.
Request of Gary B. Starnes and James
M. Starnes for preliminary plat of
Orange Valley Addition. This property
is located at the northeast corner of
Starnes Road and Douglas Lane.
I
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
August 23, 1990
Ie
I
3.
PS 90-21
Request of Gary B. Starnes and James
M. Starnes for final plat of Orange
Valley Addition. This property is
located at the northeast corner of
Starnes Road and Douglas Lane.
I
I
Chairman Wood stated there was
extensive discussion in the
pre-session regarding these requests.
I
I
Dick Perkins, engineer for the
property, came forward.
I
Chairman Wood stated that the main
problem was that all the owner's
property is not included in the
preliminary plat, and we have the
preliminary and final on the agenda
tonight. He said the drainage of the
other 6 acres needs to be addressed.
Chairman Wood asked Mr. Johnson, the
City Engineer, why he asked for a 20
foot off-site easement.
I
Ie
I
Mr. Johnston stated he asked for the
20 foot easement because he had no
information to the east.
I
Chairman Wood said the engineer has
agreed to provide that information at
a later date which would take care of
it.
I
Chairman Wood asked Mr. Johnston about
the letter he sent to the owners.
I
Mr. Johnston said he wanted the owners
to be fully aware of the development
requirements that would be required to
develop the remaining 6 acres.
I
I
Chairman Wood stated that if the
drainage is not taken care of now, in
later years, the city will have to fix
it.
Mr. Barfield said if Mr. Starnes plans
to develop is 10 years from now, does
this letter have enough teeth in it.
I
I Page 4
P & Z Minutes
Ie August 23, 1990
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Mr. Johnston said you cannot force an
owner to develop his property, but the
staff just wanted him to be aware of
the requirements.
Chairman Wood said it will not be
feasible to develop the 6 acres.
Mr. Barfield said if the property
owner to the north wanted to develop,
he would need an easement down stream.
Mr. Perkins said if he would
preliminary plat 2 acres in one lot
and 6 acres in one lot and provide a
20 foot easement, the Commission would
approve, but they would not have
accomplished anything. He said he
feels the Commission is setting a
precedence requiring the developer get
an easement. Mr. Perkins said they do
not require everyone to plat all the
property they own.
Chairman Wood said there are not many
times you have a piece of land that is
shown on the Master Drainage Plan.
Mr. Perkins asked how many other times
you have some individual present a
preliminary and final and only plat a
section of their property.
Chairman Wood said this property is
all owned by the same person. He said
Mr. Hamm does not own the property
now.
Chairman Wood said he knows the person
Mr. Perkins is speaking of. He said
that person owns approximately 700
acres and has sold off 2 pieces, none
of which has a drainage problem.
Mr. Perkins said if Mr. Starnes agreed
to granting an easement, then later
when he needed to develop the property
and needed to move the easement, he
has no assurance they could get the
city to allow them to move it.
I Page 5
p & Z Minutes
1_ August 23, 1990
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
Mr. Lueck said if Mr. Starnes would
just sign the letter.
Mr. Perkins said the Commission is
just trying to accommodate the people
to the north.
Chairman Wood stated we had a piece of
land where we needed an easement for
drainage. He said it was L.C. Tubb.
Chairman Wood said he did not want to
give an easement, but he finally did.
Alan Hamm came forward. He said he is
the proposed owner of the 10 acre
tract being heard tonight. He said if
you take away the development by
requesting him to give an easement,
you will damage him terribly. Mr.
Hamm said he had had to get the right
to dump water on property. He said he
has had to pay for it. Mr. Hamm said
he things Mr. Wood is wrong. Mr. Hamm
said he thinks the 6 acres will
develop.
Mr. Lueck said we still need to know
the effect the drainage will have on
this property.
Mr. Hamm said he has been a good
developer. He said he tries to do a
good job and he requests the
Commission consider the 10 acres,
only.
Mr. Lueck asked if the Starnes people
will sign this letter Mr. Johnston
sent.
Mr. Johnston said they will sign, but
wanted to talk to their attorney, they
might want to change the wording.
Chairman Wood stated they agreed to
most of the engineer's comments.
Mr. Perkins said he will try to have
the corrections made tomorrow and have
the drainage next week.
I Page 6
p & Z Minutes
Ie August 23, 1990
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lie
I
Chairman Wood asked about the
assessments due on this property.
Mr. Perkins read the letter from Mr.
Hamm to Gregg Dickens stating that he
will pay the assessments prior to the
filing of the final plat. He said the
signature is notorized and Mr. Dickens
agreed to it.
Mr. Angle said he appreciated Mr.
Hamm's position in wanting to get his
property developed. He said he does
not totally concur with Mr. Barfield's
contention regarding requiring the
easement at this time, but do feel the
need for the staff to study the
drainage. Mr. Angle said he thinks
that is important. He said he would
feel a little constrained to vote on
the final plat. Mr. Angle said as a
school teacher, he feels you need to
be consistent. They said sometimes
they come in and get a preliminary and
final plat approved the same evening.
Mr. Angle said if he voted for that in
the past, he does not think he did; he
said he does not think that is
logical. Mr. Angle said he feels the
staff needs to have the preliminary
plat on all the property and have time
to study it and make some
recommendations, and he hopes that
during that time, a solution can be
found so as not to infringe on the
economic rights of Mr. Starnes.
Mr. Angle moved to approve PS 90-20
pending the preliminary plat of all
the property.
Chairman Wood said that is kind of
broad. He asked Mr. Angle if he was
saying to approve the preliminary plat
subject to bringing back the whole
piece platted at time of the final.
Mr. Angle said his motion is to
approve the preliminary plat subject
to having the entire property
preliminary platted.
I
Ie
I
Page 7
P & Z Minutes
August 23, 1990
I
Chairman Wood said the Commission
cannot approve a preliminary plat if
we do not have the information on it.
I
Mr. Angle said that is where they
differ. He said he would be willing
to approve the preliminary plat, but
would not be willing to approve the
final plat.
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Chairman Wood said we need a
preliminary plat on all the property
and then come back with a final on
just the 10 acres.
Mr. Angle said that is correct.
Chairman Wood asked Mr. LeBaron if we
needed to be presented a preliminary
plat on the entire property before we
can approve it; can we approve
something we haven't received.
Mr. LeBaron said he would be reluctant
to do that.
Mr. Brock asked if they could approve
the preliminary plat subject to
getting the calculations.
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Chairman Wood said they could if they
were not adding property to it.
Mr. Barfield said he believes he can
make a motion that would work.
Mr. Angle withdrew his motion.
PS 90-20
APPROVED
Mr. Barfield made the motion to
approve PS 90-20 subject to the
engineer's comments, subject to an
appropriate drainage study for the
surrounding property being done and
whatever requirements that the
drainage study shows that they be
implemented in the final plat.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Angle
and the motion carried 6-0.
I
Page 8
P & Z Minutes
August 23, 1990
Ie
I
I
Mr. Perkins asked since approving
this, if he gets the drainage done,
will the Commission approve the final
plat at the next meeting.
I
Chairman Wood said based on what we
know tonight, we would.
I
I
Mr. Lueck said the Commission would
review it and vote on it.
PS 90-21
TABLED
Mr. Barfield made the motion to table
PS 90-21. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Brock and the motion carried 6-0.
I
I
Ie
I
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:20 P.M.
Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission
Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission
1
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
817 336-5773
~.':"~ TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS
lII:c. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
August 21, 1990
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: Orange Valley
Final Plat & Construction Plans
PS 90-21
Dear Commission Members:
We have visited with your staff regarding the comments in their letter of
August 15, 1990 and our response letter of August 16, 1990, and offer the
following comments:
1. We are in full agreement with the following items of the referenced
engineer's letter and will make the necessary adjustments on the
plat and construction plans to comply with same: 1-5; 7-19; 21-28;
and 30-32.
2. Items 6 and 20 of the engineer's letter refer to the need for a
20' drainage easement along the east property line of this
subdivision and also for additional drainage information regarding
the need for future drainage improvements in this area. We have
provided the engineer with a portion of a contract of sale on this
property for the adjacent owner that stipulates the manner in which
grading can take place on the adjacent property. We have discussed
the need for some possible additional clarification and/or a letter
from the adjacent property owner regarding this matter that would
satisfy the City's concerns in this area. We are confident that
the owner of this property can and will provide necessary
documentation and/ or letter agreement that relates to the City's
concerns. We have also agreed to provide additional storm drainage
calculations to quantify the flow of water on the property to the
east as it relates to the final graded configuration of the lots in
Orange Valley.
3. Items 29 of the engineer's letter relates to showing a further
detail of the "keyed" section that ties the pavement in existing
Starnes Road to the valley gutter at Orange Valley Drive. We have
discussed this matter with the City staff, and they have agreed
that an expansion joint at this tie-in location would be the more
appropriate means by which to connect the pavement in Starnes to
the valley gutter in Orange Valley Drive, and we are agreeable to
comply with this request.
915 Florence Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
August 21, 1990
Page Two
4. Another item that was discussed at our meeting with your staff
concerned the payment of the street assessment on Starnes Road for
this property. The current owner and the developer of this
property have agreed to split that cost, either at the closing of
the property or at some time shortly thereafter. Our client is in
agreement with paying this assessment prior to commencing
construction on the subdivision.
We appreciate your consideration of this final plat, and we will be present
at your'August 23, 1990, Commission meeting in order to discuss these matters
in more detail, if needed.
Very truly yours,
TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC.
Q~
i hard Perkins, P.E.
JRP/kfs
cc: Mr. Alan Hamm
I
I _ City of JXòrth Richland Hills
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
August 21, 1990
Ref:
PWL 90-205
Mr. Gary B. starnes
Mr. James M. starnes
7500 Douglas Lane
N. Richland Hills, TX
76180-2101
RE:
Tracts 3 and 3E, J. Condra Survey, Abstract 311,
North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas
Drainage Improvements
This letter is to confirm and document your understanding of the future
development requirements of the subject property.
The City of North Richland Hills. understands the following items.
1.
You are the current owners of Tracts 3 and 3E of the J. Condra Survey,
Abstract 311, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas.
2.
Tract 3 of the J. Condra Survey, Abstract 311, North Richland Hills,
Tarrant County, Texas, is currently being platted as Orange Valley
Addition.
3 .
The Construction Plans for Orange Valley Addition prepared by Teague,
Nall and Perkins, dated August 3, 1990, does not address any of the
drainage improvements between Tracts 3 and 3E as recommended by the
Drainage Master Plan for the City of North Richland Hills, dated March
1985.
4.
The current or future owners of Tract 3E of the J. Condra Survey,
Abstract 311, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, will bear all
the responsibility for the construction of the drainage improvements
between Tracts 3 and 3E recommended by the referenced Drainage Master
Plan.
If all the above items are correct and you understand the drainage development
requirements of Tract 3E of the J. Condra Survey, Abstract 311, North Richland
Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, please sign in the appropriate area.
(817) 281-0041
7301 N.E. lOOP 820
.
P.o. BOX 18609
.
NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TeXAS 7~180
.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
August 21, 1990
PWL 90-205
Page Two
This letter will be filed in the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas (DRTCT)
at or about the time the City Council of North Richland Hills approves the
plat of Orange Valley Addition referenced above.
<J ~~
Assistant Director of Public Works
JAJ/snun
Mr. Gary B. starnes
The state of Texas
County of Tarrant
This instrument was acknowledged before me on
by
day of
, 1990
(SEAL)
Notary Public, state of Texas
Notary's Printed Name:
Mr. James M. Starnes
The state of Texas
County of Tarrant
This instrument was acknowledged before me on
by
day of
, 1990
(SEAL)
Notary Public, state of Texas
Notary's Printed Name:
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
817 336-5773
~Ð TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS
...~ CON S U L TIN G E· N GIN E E R S
August 16, 1990
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Dear Commission Members:
Re: Orange Valley
Final Plat & Construction Plans
PS-90-21
We are in receipt of your engineer's letter regarding the review of the
subject subdivision and offer the following comments:
1. We are in full agreement with the following items of the referenced
letter and will make the necessary adjustments on the plat and
construction plans to compy with same: 1-4; 7-18; 23-24; 26-28;
and 30-32.
2. Items 5 and 19 of the engineer's letter refer to providing an
easement and a drainage facility for a very small off-site drainage
area (OA-3). Due to the fact that the 5-year flow from this area
is only 3.3 cfs, we do not believe it would be necessary to provide
a drainage facility between Lots 17, 18 and 19 in order to comply
with the City's ordinance requirement that only allows flow to
cross from one lot to another before entering a drainage facility.
In addition, the entire 3.3 cfs does not accumulate directly at
this point of entry into the suggested easement. Therefore, a very
insignificant amount of water crosses Lots 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and
20 as it sheet flows from this adjacent property onto Orange
Valley. Therefore, we would respectfully request that you not
require us to dedicate such an easement nor to build the requested
drainage facility.
3. Items 6 and 20 of the engineer's letter refer to the need for a 20'
drainage easement along the east property line of this subdivision
and also for additional drainage information regarding need for
future drainage improvements in this area. As a condition of sale
of this property (Orange Valley), the owner, who also owns the
property to the east of this subdivision, Gary and James Starnes,
has agreed to allow the developer of this property to breach the
dam on both stock ponds, if necessary, and also to grade a portion
of the adjacent tract so that no water will impound on the proposed
lots to be developed by our client. If necessary, we would be glad
to furnish you with a copy of the contract indicating the
willingness of the seller to provide this means of relief to the
developer.
915 Florence Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
August 16, 1990
Page Two
4. Item 21 refers to the need for establishing minimum finished floor
elevations at 1.0 foot above the top-of-curb within the
subdivision. We will revise the drainage layout sheet to reflect
flow arrows depicting the flow of drainage from the various lots
within the subdivision; however, there will be some lots in which
it will be very difficult to grade the lots directly to the street,
and we would respectfully request that you allow us to grade all of
the lots on the east side of Orange Valley Drive in the manner in
which they presently drain onto the adjacent property owner who has
allowed us to drain onto his property. We would also respectfully
request that you allow us to grade Lots 31 and 32 all to Starnes
Road rather than partial portions of them being graded to Dustin
Court.
The Subdivision Ordinance requirement for establishing the finished
floor elevations a minimum of 1.0' above top-of-curb throughout a
subdivision is often difficult to obtain. If developers are
required to grade lots that meet the ordinance requirements
relative to not grading from more than one lot onto another lot,
and also to establish finished floor elevations l' above top-of-
curb, you may find many areas that have relatively steep grades and
trees in which many trees will have to be removed in order to meet
this latter criteria. Please bear with us and allow us to make the
necessary grading that complies with the former requirement but not
require us to establish all finished floor elevations l' above top-
of-curb.
5.
Items 22 and 25 of the engineer's letter refer to the fact that we
have transitioned the street crown in Orange Valley Drive from 6"
to 5" near Starnes Road in order to eliminate the need for
extension of the storm sewer at Starnes Road further into the
subdivision. We would respectfully request that you permit us to
make this curb transition over this small distance (350') so as to
minimize the detrimental aesthetic effect on the subdivision from
several curb inlets. The proposed section of a 6" curb with a 5"
crown will adequately contain the 5-year storm prior to entering
the proposed inlets at the Starnes/Orange Valley intersection.
6.
Item 29 of the engineer's letter relates to showing a further
detail of the "keyed" section that ties the pavement in existing
Starnes Road to the valley gutter at Orange Valley Drive. We did
not propose to have a "keyed" section at this location, but to
simply tie the reinforcing steel in the Starnes Road paving to the
proposed reinforcing steel in the Orange Valley Drive valley gutter
in the same manner that we did in our recent construction of
Peachtree Estates approximately t of a mile east of this
subdivision. We believe that this is a better design and that a
"keyed" section would be impossible to construct due to the fact
that the pavement on Starnes Road is already existing and will need
to be sawcut.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
August 16, 1990
Page Three
We appreciate your consideration of the items mentioned in this letter in
which we have concern. We will be present at your August 23, 1990,
Commission meeting in order to discuss these matters in more detail.
Very truly yours,
TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC.
JRP/kfs
Q~
ard Perkins, P.E.
cc: Mr. Alan Hamm
I
I _ City of J{òrth Richland Hills
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
August 15, 1990
Ref:
PWM 90-108
MEMO TO:
Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM:
John A. Johnston, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works
SUBJECT:
Orange Valley Addition
Final Plat and Construction Plans
PS 90-21
We have reviewed the subject documents received in our office August 6, 1990
and offer the following comments:
Final Plat:
1.
The plat title should be revised to read Final Plat.
2.
The existing zoning east of this addition should be checked and revised.
3 .
Sidewalk and Utility Easement corner clips should be added at the right-
of-way intersection of Starnes Road and Orange Valley Drive.
4.
A 15-foot utility easement should be added between Lots 13 and 14 and
Lots 29 and 30, Block 1.
5.
The 15-foot drainage and utility easements between Lots 17 and 19 and
Lots 18 and 19, Block 1, should be labeled 15-foot Drainage and Utility
Easement.
6.
A 20-foot drainage easement along the east property line of this
Addition should be added to the Plat.
Water, Sewer and Drainage Improvements
Water Layout:
7.
A current copy of the Final Plat should be included in the set of plans.
8.
Water jetting is no longer an allowed compaction method. Backfill
should be native material compacted to 95% Standard Proctor in no
greater than 6" lifts.
(817) 281-0041
7301 N.E. lOOP 820
.
P.O. BOX 18609
.
NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180
.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
9. The names of specific inspectors should be removed from the plans. The
lead inspector has not yet been assigned.
10. The "Poly Pig" will not be provided by the Water Department. The note
should be removed from the plans.
11. Flow calculations should be provided to support the construction of a 6"
deadend waterline. If flow calculations will not support the 6" main,
the waterline in Orange Valley Drive should be upsized to an 8" line and
6" main in Market Court should be connected to the waterline in Douglas
Lane.
12. The double service at Lots 13 and 14, Block 1, should be relocated to
another property line. The present location conflicts with the
sanitary sewer main.
12A. The last water service connection on a deadeand line should be located
near the end of the line.
Sewer Layout:
13.
The notes about backfill and compaction modified on the Water Layout
Sheet apply to sanitary sewer construction also.
14.
The Technical Inspector has not yet been assigned on this Project.
Specific reference to an individual inspector should be deleted.
Offsite Sewer:
15.
The approximate location of the existing storm drain line and all other
conflicts should be shown in profile.
Water and Sewer Details:
16. The street Replacement Details should be revised to show native
backfill compacted above the utility bedding.
Overall Drainage Area Map:
17.
Modify the notes as shown on the marked-up set of plans.
18.
An Engineers Certification should be included on this sheet. An
example of the certification is shown in the Subdivision Ordinance.
Drainage Layout:
19.
A proper drainage structure should be designed to pick up the expected
flow from offsite Drainage Area ItOA-3".
20.
Due to the possible impact of the drainage area to the east on the
proposed development, the engineer should provide additional
information and calculations. This information should include:
offsite drainage area from the east, the location of the existing stock
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
II
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
pond, elevation of the stock pond spillway, calculated spread of water
and future drainage improvements.
21.
All finished floor elevations are required to be 1.0' above the top of
curb. The path of storm water runoff can cross no more than one lot
before reaching a storm drainage improvement, a drainage easement or
street right-of-way. The Drainage Area Delineation should be revised
to more accurately depict the flow of drainage across this subdivision.
Drainage Calculations:
22.
If the drainage capacity of the standard street section is exceeded,
the storm drain system should be extended to intercept the excess flow
as required by the Design Manual.
storm Drainage Details:
23.
The Embedment Details should be modified as shown in the marked-up
sheet.
Paving Improvements Plans:
Final Plat:
24. A current copy of the Final Plat should be included int he set of plans.
Orange Valley Drive:
25. The note referring to the transition of the street crown from 6" to 5"
should be removed.
Douglas Lane:
26.
A crossection of Douglas Lane should be shown. The section should
include a 6 foot - 2" thick HMAC Transition from the new crown
elevation to existing pavement.
street Paving Details:
27. The curb ramp detail should be modified to show that the ramp and curb
& gutter section are to be poured monolithic.
28.
The joint detail should be modified as noted on the marked-up sheet.
29.
Further details should be included with the next submittal to show how
the IIkeyed" section will be achieved on the existing starnes Road for
tie in at Orange Valley Drive.
30.
All curb grade should be no flatter than 0.5%. Special attention
should be given to the grades in the cul-de-sacs.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
General:
31. The developer should coordinate the layout and design of the street
lights which will serve this subdivision, with TU Electric. The cost
for installation will be paid by the developer directly to TU Electric.
32. Sidewalks will be required for this subdivision and should therefore be
incorporated into the final plans.
The marked-up plans given to the engineer should be returned with his next
submittal.
The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer
of his responsibility to provide adequate, accurate, and buildable
construction plans. The City eventual approval of the construction plans will
not signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills
for the engineering in the bid documents.
é}L-~ -IV\.
JAJ/smm
cc: Gregory W. Dickens, Director of Public Works
Barry LeBaron, Director of Community Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO Wanda Calvert. P&Z Coordinator
FROM
SUBJECT:
I
Ie
I
I
REF:
PS90-21
Steve Pen~e. Dept. Comm. Dev.
DA TE:
8-14-90
Oran~e Vallev Subdivision
Be advised that the Department of Community Development has
reviewed the above mentioned plat and offers the following
comments:
1. Lot 19. Blo~k 1 should have a 25 foot front building line
instead of the 35 foot that is indi~ated.
2. Lot 24. Blor.k 1 indir.ates a r.irr.ular 35 foot building
line a~ross the northwest side of the property. this
building line should be deleted.
3. Lot 27. Blo~k 1 indi~ates a ~ir~ular 35 foot building
line ä~ross the southwest side of the property, this
building line should be deleted.
I
I
I - ~ubject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Community Development Council Meeting Date: 10/8/90
Request ot James R. Harr1s & Joe wr1gnt ~or
Final Plat of Steeple Ridge Addition. This Agenda Number: PS 90-24
property 1S Locatea west O~ uaV1S Hou~evard
Mr. James R. Harris, owner and developer of a 22.8 acre tract on the north side
of the City, has submitted a Final Plat of Steeple Ridge Addition. This
subdivision contains 67 lots and is zoned R-2 (Residential). The Planning and
Zoning Commission approved the Final Plat at their September 27th, 1990 meeting
subject to engineer's comments except for Item No.8. The Planning and Zoning
Commission stipulated that proper utility easements be obtained for sewer
service from this subdivision to the new Trinity River Authority sewer outfall
line. This requirement has been satisfied.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council consider the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission subject to the developer complying with all
comments of the City Engineer.
Finance Review
I Source of Funds:
_ Bonds (GO/Rev.) _
- operaMudget _
I Other l/!ØJ/Jl4~t/l;;;;// "¡211.7~
I Department Head Signature ~ ~anager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
,Finance Director
Page 1 of
Ie
I
I
lAG
I·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
SEPTEMBER 27, 1990 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order
Chairman Mark Wood at 7:30 P.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Chairman
Members
ire Community Dev.
P & Z Coordinator
Mark Wood
Don Bowen
Ron Lueck
Don Collins
Pat Marin
Barry LeBaron
Wanda Calvert
ABSENT:
James Brock
David Barfield
George Angle
CONSI TION OF THE MINUTES
PTEMBER 13, 1990
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. This motion
was seconded by Ms. Marin and the
motion carried 5-0.
-
I
I
II
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
1 .
PS 90-24
Request of James R. Harris & Joe
Wright for Final Plat of Steeple Ridge
Addition. This property is located
west of Davis Boulevard and north of
Shady Grove Road.
Chairman Wood asked if this plat
should be called Steeple Ridge, Phase
I.
Mr. LeBaron said the developer had
rather just call it Steeple Ridge
Addition.
PS 90-24
APPROVED
Ms. Marin made the motion to approve
PS 90-24 subject to the engineer's
comments with the exception of item
#8, providing the city with a utility
agreement with TRA and deleting the
panhandle part of lot 36, Block 1,
from the plat, but still grant the
utility easement there. This motion
was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the
motion carried 5-0.
I·
Ie.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
;1
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
817 336-5773
.~ cT~'}C:c¿~ T !\f~~L AIYI? G~ENRfí!1'f~
October 3, 1990
Mr. Barry LeBaron
Director of Community Development
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: PS 90-24
Steeple Ridge (Phase I)
Submittal of Revised Documents per
City Review Comments
Dear Mr. LeBaron:
Based on the Planning & Zoning Commission's approval of the subj ect final
plat, we have revised the final plat to address the P&Z comments as well as
the City staff comments. On Friday, September 28, 1990, I submitted the
revised final plat to Kevin Miller for his review and comments. Also, on
Monday, October 1, 1990, we submitted the requested information to address
Review Comment No. 7 which deals with the storm water runoff leaving the
subject project.
We are submitting the enclosed documents which address each of the City's
review comments (reference letter from Kevin Miller dated Sept. 14, 1990).
1. Twenty-four (24) folded bluelines of revised final plat: The
revised final plat addresses the P&Z comments and Review Comments
No. 1-6.
2. One (1) copy of executed Trinity River Authority (TRA) easement:
This executed easement document meets TRA' s approval and
requirements for access to the TRA sewer and metering station.
3. Two (2) Permanent Sanitary Sewer Line Easements: Review Comment
No. 8 requests that a permanent sewer easement from Joe Wright and
James R. Harris be executed for the off-site sewer line which will
tie-in Steeple Ridge Phase I with the proposed TRA sewer line.
4. One (1) Permanent Water Line Easement: Review Comment No. 9
requests that a IS-foot utility easement be executed for the
proposed water line that will extend from Steeple Ridge Phase I to
the existing City water main along Davis Blvd.
5. Two (2) "Letters of Permission" for discharge of storm water:
Review Comment No. 7 requests that Joe Wright and James R. Harris,
who are the adjacent property owners who will be receiving the
storm water runoff from this project, execute a "Letter of
Permission" to receive storm water from this project.
915 Florence Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
I
Ie.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Mr. Barry LeBaron
Director of Community Development
City of North Richland Hills
October 3, 1990
Page Two
6. One (1) revised plan sheet for the concrete flume on the drainage
improvement plans. This revised plan sheet addresses Review
Comment No. 7 which requires that a concrete flume be constructed
between Lots 5 and 6, Block 1 of Steeple Ridge to convey off-site
drainage to Steeple Ridge Drive.
On Tuesday, October 2, 1990, we were notified by Mr. Kevin Miller that the
information submitted to the City for addressing the off-site discharge does
not meet the City's approval. It is our intent to schedule a meeting this
morning with City staff to present additional information to address the
off-site drainage situation and resolve this review comment.
We are requesting that the City include the Steeple Ridge final plat on the
agenda for the October 8, 1990 City Council meeting. The developer and
engineer for this project have made every effort to address each of the
City's review comments and have submitted information in support of approval
of this final plat. We appreciate your promptness in this matter and are
available to answer any further questions upon request.
Sincerely,
Alan D. Greer, P.E.
ADG/kfs
Enclosures
cc: Mr. James R. Harris
Mr. Kevin Miller
I,
ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
817 336-5773
.···~.~~œ TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS
~ ~ CON S U L TIN G E N GIN E E R S
September 18, 1990
Planning & Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: PS 90-24
Steeple Ridge Phase I
Final Plat and Construction Plans
Dear Commission members:
We are in receipt of the September 14, 1990, review letter for the final
plat and construction plans for the subject subdivision by your engineer.
We are in agreement with all nine (9) comments in the engineers letter.
However, we believe it would be necessary to clarify a matter on item 8
regarding the TRA's requirements for access to the TRA's metering station.
We have been in very close contact with TRA regarding their needs for both
the metering station easement, the sewer main easement, and access to the
metering station itself. TRA has informed us that they do not need any
form of a temporary access easement from Phase I to the proposed sewer
metering station site. TRA does need an access easement to the metering
station from Trails Edge Drive which will be constructed as part of Phase
II of this subdivision. We are in the process of working with TRA to
finalize the details of that easement. Should you need verification of
TRA's requirements in writing, we will be glad to visit with them
concerning such and provide that to the City.
Thank you very much for your consideration of this final plat and
construction plans. We will be present at your September 28, 1990,
meeting to discuss any questions you may have regarding same.
Very truly yours,
INC.
J. Richard
JRP/jah
cc: Mr. Jim Harris
915 Florence Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
I,
Ie City of JXòrth Richland Hills
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I_
I-
I
1
1
I
1
I_
I
I
September 14, 1990
Ref: PWM 90-120
MEMO TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Kevin Miller, P.E.
Assistant Director of Utilities
SUBJECT: PS 90-24; STEEPLE RIDGE PHASE I;
Final Plat and Construction Plans
We have reviewed the referenced documents submitted on August 23, 1990 and
offer the following comments.
1. Call number 13 should be revised from "57 seconds" to "51 seconds" as is
shown on the drawing.
2. The Surveyor's Seal and signature should be added to the plat.
3. The attached easement dedication should be added to the plat.
4. There is an existing TESCO easement shown to encroach on Lots 35 and 36
of Block 1. This easement should be vacated or a better description of
the easement included on this plat.
5. There is a 20-foot building setback shown on Block 1, Lot 31 and a 25-
foot building setback shown on Block 1, Lot 25. Since these are both
side yards, they should be revised to be equal.
6. The current zoning for this plat should be shown in bold print so that it
can be clearly identified.
7. There is stormwater runoff leaving this plat in a concentrated form at
Shadybrooke Drive, Kensignton Lane, Twisted oaks Way and between Lots 19
and 20, Block 2. Sufficient information should be added to the drainage
study to determine if all of the runoff can be delivered to an existing
watercourse. It does not appear to meet that criteria at this time.
Public Works should also be supplied with a notarized letter from the
adjacent property owner stating that he agrees to accept the referenced
water as shown on the attached plans. In addition, there is significant
. water entering Lots 5 and 6, Block 1 to require an easement and a flume.
If this water cannot be properly conveyed through a flume, then
additional pipe may be necessary.
(817) 281-0041
· 7301 N.E. lOOP 820 · P.O. BOX 18609 · NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS 76180
1-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
8.
The offsite sewer is to be constructed to the north City Limit Line. The
sewer will discharge to a proposed TRA sewer main. The sewage will pass
through a TRA sewer meter. TRA will need to read this meter on a monthly
basis. Since Phases II and III are not proposed at this time, some
provision needs to be made to provide access to the referenced metering
station. The proposed temporary access should be included in these
construction plans and approved by TRA. In addition, an easement should
be provided on separate documents for both the sewer line and the
required access.
9.
The plat and drawings should be revised according to the attached mark-
ups. The referenced mark-ups should be returned with the next submittal.
,~'~274~
Kevin B. Miller, P.E.
Assistant Director of utilities
KBM/smm
cc: Barry LeBaron, Director of Community Development
Gregory W. Dickens, Director of Public Works/utilities
I
I
I - &,ubject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
II
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: LeQ'al Council Meeting Date: 10/8/90
Authorization to Execute Deed to Lot lR, Block C,
Smithfield Addition - Resolution No. 90-44 Agenda Number: GN 90-143
The City Council accepted the bid of Smithfield Masonic Lodge at the
September 24th, 1990 meeting. The attached resolution authorizes the Mayor
to execute the deed and the City Secretary to deliver the deed to Smithfield
Masonic Lodge.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that City Council approve Resolution No. 90-44.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
I Source of Funds:
_ Bonds (GO/Rev.)
. Operating Budget
I Other
I
vkY
1
¡¿f1c;l~
City Manager
. Finance Director
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
RESOLUTION NO. 90-44
WHEREAS, the City Council accepted the bid of Smithfield Masonic Lodge for Lot
lR, Block C, Smithfield Addition as described in the copy of the Special Warranty Deed
attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, such acceptance of said bid is shown in the minutes of the City Council
Meeting of September 24, 1990. .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1.
The Mayor be and is hereby authorized to execute the original deed (a copy of which
is attached) from the City to Smithfield Masonic Lodge, and the City Secretary is authorized
to make delivery of said deed to said grantee.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 8th day of October, 1990.
APPROVED:
Tommy Brown - Mayor
A TIEST:
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire - Attorney for City
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
129- SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED (Without Vendor's Lien bV Corøoration~
; :".... - - ...~... ___-- W ~ ~" r~' .....~..."
~.".
.-
[1
~.:
ff
1
~
M
¡1
:]
~ ;':;..--
..~....-..~
Texas Standard Form
~. - ""'_...... ~~
;J
"I
;1
~
:~
~~,
-.JT.._:.:~
J.~';"
m4r ~tntr nf Wrxnø,
alountg or Tarrant
,}
iKnøm .A1l1lttt by wqt.øt 'rt.øtu1ø:
11
~
~
)'
~
~J
1!
;,
'J
, .~
, i
1
;~
f~
'1
i 1
r~
~
J
l~
~~
That the City of North Richland Hills
Municipal
a Corporation, duly organized and existing under the Laws of the State of
Texas
for and in consideration of the sum of
----------------Fifteen Hundred-----------------------------------_________IK)L~S
to it in hand paid by
Smithfield Masonic Lodge
P.O. Box 821413, Fort Worth, Texas 76182-1413
~
~
~
i
as follows:
Services in kind, fully paid, receipt acknowledged,
;;,4
it
~
~
!Î
!~
~
~
~
~
IJ
~
-A
_.1
"" -
;·1
\~
~·1
-""
J
;~
~
:J
~'j
~
.:1
[1
j
;.~
q
~1
~
~
04
fj
[ '1
:. ¡
~1
has Granted, Sold and Conveyed, and by these presents does Grant, Sell and Convey, unto the said
Smithfield Masonic Lodge
of the County of Tarrant
tract described as follows:
;
State of
Texas
all that certain
~
J
~
~
~1
"All of Lot 1R, Block C, Smithfield Addition, North Richland Hi Us, Tarrant County, Texas as shown by plat
approved by the City Council on July 27, 1987, burdened with the following eaSRents:
(1) a ten foot uti l ity easellef1t shown on said plat and a five foot uti lity easement across the north side of
said lot; and
..,
(2) a twenty foot easement for ingress and egress in favor of the Smithfield Cemetery Association described
as follows:
~1
<j
~1
~;
f ~
...-,
Beginning at a point in the North lot line 15 feet from the NE corner of said Lot 1R; thence along the
north lot line a distance of 20 feet to a point; thence south a distance of 100 feet to a point in the
south lot line 35 feet west of the southeast corner of said Lot 1-R; thence east a distance of 20 feet to
a point in the south lot line 15 feet west of the southeast corner of said Lot 1-R; thence north a distance
01 100 feet to the point of beginning."
;1
¡j
;1
d
~ l
J
.~
¡~
q
~j
~
q
J
r,
1
¡j
l~
3~
~;
~
i~
I
j
f
~ :
;:;.¡
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, together with all and singular the rights
1
;:.~
Warrant and Forever Defend, all and singular the said premises unto the said
its
11
'~l
~
~~
, I
:J
\i
:~
Smithfield Masonic LOdge.~
~
and appurtenances thereto in anywise belonging Unto the said Smithfield Masonic Lodge, its
successors
xImiIIt and assigns forever and the said Corporation does hereby bind itself, its successors and assigns, to
~ess.ors . '.
and assigns, agamst every person whomsoever lawfully clauning, or to claun the same, or any part
~
~
0;1
iJ'
,
\ ,
1'1
thereof, by, through or under said corporation, but not otherwise,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused these presents to be signed by its duly
authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the Corporation, at
~
~
~
'1
~
~
~
::,
-~~='-~.' ¡¡; - .'~-~
this
day of
A.D 1990
Attest:
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
By
City Secretary
MAYOR
IfìIi1IDiIt
(Seal )
"'-"~
.....-..
~I~ - ~. ~~_... - - ~I_~
....~-
't1!"""
}---.. - ~~~"'f_. ~_ _"to: j'~-!- T-~-~MIP"~_ _ ~~_MP'~._ ~.4
I
I ~Department:
- ~ ~ubject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Environmental Services Council Meeting Date: 10/08/90
Increase in Surgery Fees for Adopted Animals Agenda Number: GN 90-144
The Animal Shelter Advisory Board has recommended that the fees paid to area
veterinarians who participate in the Adoption Spay/Neuter Program be raised
from $25.00 per surgery to $30.00 per surgery.
To date over five hundred dogs and cats have been through the Animal Care and
Control Center Adoption/Neuter Program. Veterinarians in North Richland Hills
as well as around the state have participated over the past three years.
Without their help this program could not continue.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the neutering fee paid to participating veterinarians
be increased from $25.00 to $30.00 effective January 1, 1991.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
\. Operating Budget _
I Ot~~3.~ qþ V~
I Dep~ead Signature t::ty Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Communi t
Council Meeti ng Date: 10 /8 /90
Ord1nance - Po 1CY
Assessments - Agenda Number: GN 90-145
-- ~ubject:
At the last City Council Meeting, questions were raised regarding certain
procedures in the Subdivision Ordinance which require all outstanding taxes and
assessments to be paid prior to the submittal of a Final Plat to the City
Council. The Final Plat that was being considered at the time had an
outstanding tax and assessment lien on the property. However, contract
documents between the property owner and the developer included provisions for
the payment of these outstanding obligations at the time of closing of the sale
of the property and upon approval of the Final Plat by the City Council. As
a general practice this appears to be customary, since most typical property
transfers require the payment of outstanding taxes and assessments as a
conditions of title transfer at the time of closing.
The attached proposed ordinance has been prepared to address this issue. If
approved by the City Council this ordinance will modify the Subdivision
Ordinance to allow the submittal of any written arrangements for the payment
of taxes and assessments in lieu of prepayment. The City Council will continue
to review any proposed arrangements along with the Final Plat to make certain
that payment for any obligations due the City of North Richland Hills is
satisfactory.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 1694.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
Operating Budget
Ot~ ClAA,~ h~ n ~~ ~ 1'[ lit ~~
Depa~~adQgnature ~ ~anager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 1579 , THE SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE, TO ALLOW SUBMITTAL OF WRITTEN
ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE PAYMENT OF TAXES OR
ASSESSMENTS AT THE TIME OF FINAL PLAT REVIEW BY
THE CITY COUNCIL; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS:
I.
THAT, ORDINANCE 1579, "THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS", SECTION 1-03, Subsection E,
Paragraph 3, be hereby amended to hereafter be and read as
follows:
3. No subdivision plat shall be submitted to the City
Council for final approval unless and until all taxes,
assessment charges and other monetary obligations due
to the City of North Richland Hills and currently
outstanding on the property are paid or a written and
signed document is filed by the owner showing his plan
for immediate or pending payment of these obligations.
Receipts of such payments or written details of
arrangements must be submitted with the Final Plat
application to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator.
The details of such written document shall be reported
to the City Council, and the City Council shall have
the discretion to go forward with the hearing on plat
approval and shall have the further discretion to
refuse to hear the platting case or amend the terms of
the written plan.
II.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. That it is hereby declared to be the
intention of the City Council that the section, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are
severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or
section of this ordinance shall be declared invalid or
unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any
court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining
phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this
ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
Ordinance No. 1694
Page 2
City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such invalid or
unconstitutional phase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
III.
SAVINGS CLAUSE. That Ordinance No. 1579, the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of
North Richland Hills, as amended shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as
amended by this ordinance.
IV.
EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication as provided by the North Richland Hills Charter and the laws of
the State of Texas.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 8th day of October, 1990.
APPROVED:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
- f
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I eepartment: Administration
I - S,ubject: Recyclinq
I
I
I
I
I
I
1_
,I
I
I
I
I
I
Council Meeting Date: 10/8/90
Agenda Number: GN 90-146
On August 27, 1990 the Mayor appointed Council Mack Garvin and Councilman Lyle
Welch to study a proposal made by Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. to conduct a
citywide recycling program. The committee has met and reviewed various options
and is prepared to recommend adoption of Laidlaw's proposal to the City
Council. The proposed starting date is December 1, 1990 with a promotional
campaign beginning immediately. The attached letter dated September 19, 1990
outlines the promotional campaign. The basic recycling program will have the
following features.
1. Laidlaw Waste System will provide one 20 gallon container to every home
in the City.
2. Laidlaw will make one pick up per week, at the curb, of recycling
materials and deliver to a recycling center. The pick up will be in
addition to the regularly scheduled twice weekly pick up.
3. Recycling centers will be required to keep weekly records of weights
by items and provide a monthly recap to the City.
4. Revenues resulting from the recycling program will be used to defer
part of the recycling costs.
5. Recycling materials include newspapers, glass, plastic and metal cans.
6. The term of this contract will run concurrent with the current
franchise agreement and will expire in June, 1995.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the recycling program be implemented and the collection
contract be awarded to Laidlaw Waste systems, Inc. in the amount of $2.00 per
month for each residential customer.
Finance Review
I Source of Funds:
_ Bonds (GO/Rev.)
I gr:p.rating BU.dget - ¡¿ ~ A
{, ,- t--<Ý/ " ~, ~
~/'J-a'~.?&-''/'7"0,~ , [1 ~~
!\v 0 II \ Department Head Signature Ity Manager
f'? CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
ØØ8SØØØ
LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS INC.
September 19~ 1990
City of North Richland Hills
þ>. (>. Bc~x 18609
North Richland Hills~ TX 76180
Attn: Dennis Horvath
Asst. City Manager
Dear [)ennis:
Per your request. I have enclosed the following proposed
age11da for the dist~"'it~lrt.ì(.)n of lit.81"'a't.t11"'e and in11:alenle11t.at.icJ11
c>f a J..:t1"'omotional canlpaig11 for :t...ecycli11g in yo 1...11'" cì t.y Þ
Laidlaw will dedicate a budget of $20tOOO to be spent in
the City of North Richland Hills specifically for promotional
literature and give away item to residents. This money will
be spent over the life of the contract wit~ at least 35%
going to promotional costs incurred during the first 30 day
period prior to beginning the recycling contract, and up to
30 days after the progr~l startsÞ
The remainder of the promotional money will be spent
over the remainder of the life of the recycling contxact.
The program that we propose is listed below for your
consi¡je1"'ation:
6 WEEKS BEFORE START UP: A let.t.e1'" from the nlayt,)1'" and
the council to the citizens of the City of North Richland
Hills announcing the recycling program and establishing a
specif ie date for a t.OWl1 meeting t.() ed~lcate ci t.ize11s ab01..1t.
recycling. This letter will be mailed to every household in
the city at Laidlaw's expense.
5 WEEKS BEFORE START UP: The first letter froß1 Laidlaw
Waste Systems will be mailed to every household in tbe city
anni')l111cing: "Ame1"'ica r s Most Comprehel1sive Curbsitie Recycling
Prclgranl- - -Now Appeal....i11g At. Your Fl"'()}1t. [)()t.)r".
~ WEEKS BEFORE START UP: The second mail out to every
household in the city from Laidlaw Waste Systems entitled
"Laidlaw and You. Þ ÞPa1...tJ1erS in Recycling".
6100 ELLIOTT REEDER ROAD, FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76117 (817) 332-7301
I
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
3 WEEKS BEFORE START UP: Laidlaw will provide special
three-minute programs designed to educate the public about
recycling and will run these programs on public access
channel of cable T. V. in your city as frequently as }:>ossible
from this date up to two weeks after start up has begun.
Also, Laidlaw employees will make arrangements to visit all
elementary and junior high schools in your city to meet with
all the students in a common assembly at their school to
promote recycling. This will include handouts to the
elementary schools that will consist of recycling coloring
books and other give away items promoting recycling.
2 WEEKS BEFORE START UP: Laidlaw will deliver recycling
bins to every household in the city. Included with the bins
will be additional give away items, such as magnets promoting
recycling to place on the residents refrigerator doors,
plastic trash bags that promote recycling to be placed in the
residents automobiles and additional literature explaining to
the resident specifically how to recycle.
1 WEEK BEFORE START UP: Laidlaw will take an
advertisement in the newspaper of your choice, to be no less
than one-half page, announcing the start up of the recycling
program in your city and providing a phone number for
residents to call with questions concerning pick up days or
any requirements upon the resident.
START UP WEEK: Laidlaw will 1=)lace an advertisement in
the newspaper of your choice, to be no less than one-half
page, reminding residents that recycling starts in their city
this week.
1 WEEK AFTER START UP: Laidlaw will mail Otlt a
recycling bulletin to every household in the city. This
bulletin will include pictures of local residents and special
interest groups participating in the City of Nort~ Richland
Hills recycling program.
WEEKS 2 THROUGH (a. AFTER START UP: Laidlaw will begin
direct mail outs to tbose residents who have not participated
in the recycling progra~m at least one time during the first
30 days period. We will be able to obtain this information
from route audits that will be done daily on each recycling
collection day. We will attempt to concentrate our efforts
from t.his point fiJrward i.)n those 1"'esìde11t.s who dt,) 11 t:'J "t. t.aJ.~e an
active part in the program.
I'
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
In closing, let me say that this program has been used
in many other parts of the country where Laidlaw Waste
Systems now provides recycling services to over 600,000
homes.
If you wish to make revisions in this program, we will
be happy to discuss that with you at your convenience.
I have included samples of literature that is similar to
what we will use in your city. I know you realize that we
have not committed to printing literature specifically
directed to the City of North Richland Hills until we are
sure we have a contract. Therefore, the examples I have
provided are taken from programs already in place in other
parts of the countxy.
Although this program is directed to school students and
direct mail communications, we will be happy to address every
homeowners association or community group regarding this
recycling program in an effort to increase participation.
It is also our understanding that the City of Norti1
Richland Hills has block captains on most streets in the
city. We would also encourage a meeting with all block
captains to enlist their support in promoting our recycling
campaign.
If there are any questions you may have, please feel
free to contact me.
Respe tful
¡J
Herb AlIre
Division
HA/dlj
attachments
I
I
I - &,ubject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Public Works
Approve Grantlng Easements from Clty ot
North Richland Hills to Southwestern Bell
Telephone
Council Meeting Date: 10/08/90
GN 90-147
Agenda Number:
The City acquired Out-Lots 6-R and 7-R, Fair Oaks Addition, by dedication as public
right-of-way. This dedication appears on the 2nd Filing of the Fair Oaks Addition
plat, dated February 12, 1990, Vol. 388-194, page 2.
Bursey Road South runs adjacent to and south of Out-Lots 6-R and 7-R. Lots 6 and 7 of
the Oakvale Addition are adjacent to Bursey Road South and are owned by Mrs. Adiene
Jones. The City has agreed to vacate and abandon Out-Lots 6-R and 7-R, Fair Oaks
Addition, and the adjacent portion of Bursey Road South, and deed these together as one
tract to Mrs. Jones. A preliminary exhibit for the total tract to be vacated has been
prepared.
Southwestern Bell Telephone has underground conduit in Bursey Road South and
underground service lines across Out-Lots 6-R and 7-R. Before the City deeds the
vacated area to Mrs. Jones, Southwestern Bell is requesting easements (Easements C
and B on Exhibit "A") for these existing lines to clearly specify their location.
Southwestern Bell Telephone also requests a 20' x 20' (Exhibit "B") easement in the
north corner of Out-Lot 7-R in order to build a 5' x 10' above ground equipment
cabinet. They are also requesting a 5' easement (Easement A on Exhibit "A") running
from the equipment cabinet to Easement B.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends the City dedicate the easements to Southwestern Bell Telephone and
authorize the Mayor to execute the easement documents on the City's behalf.
~
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/A
Sufficient Funds Available
,Kl~/~
nt Head Signature ~ ty Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
1
I l~
~-~
" ,--
I
(II cr&I.1IUINS
- I ~ ') :: ~\11 : I ~ I · ,It · ... .
tD- ~\ to A(IMf
tn ~
3~!I! t: !':2 Ñ::r:l ~ III C
~ \.~. i
III: :: ~_: ! . . ... . .. . .. .. _ j
t-
I.
I -
I
Þ-
o
I ä·
0')0- ('1'\
, <6~CfA
!) -x.~ ~
4C,U')
~?
""9. !
I = I t: =
I .. ..
11* t:
... N ..
- :: I: !I
I
II .. I" -
..
- = L!I :
I
"!
'"
I I~
~I
a§N~
~\~\
I cx.~,~
~ \\ \Î) U\
~_~ t..#
~ ~,
!~
~~
§ li"lI]
\ : .. j
· .... .. Inci:~ ... N - ~ C\I
' cp ~.....
2 rt M ~' J
co / 0 ..
- .. .. · .. · ... · · M II ... ..T
'N"! il1llY ,. +~ = R HQ ~
: ~~... ::=:7 - _ !l0:;:I ~ III 18 :; 18 II
ø' · ~~ ~ (T)
\\J~~ -;i ~ e- g Ñlh ! ~ :: ';. oor1
.. · .. .. ~ I ~! _ -, .. ~ -:..... § 71-1· I ~ \11 N: ! . . " .
~. ~ ! 7 I ...".. nlYIIIN
, -~7· ·/1
M · ~ 'T /1"/. ..,../- ~
1 r-- r- : 7:; I, II I I a / öi / ::I ~
... ~ I N"!4HY
- I --- ~
: !I = t: I = : 2 Ñ ~ = ~ 10 C, ( t\ ~ = - :: \11 : I ! · . rr-." . .. . .. .. _ 3 .
:: \11 : ! · .. " ./.. ./../.. -) "." +: !I =! t: = !: 1"'12 Ñ I¥ = ~ III C I~
~~~1;tI·l·fIT1·f±[-j A §~--~l-:EU~l~:'! ·t ~~"L~ .... ~ŒI
;~ ¡~ 7J !!"
~IC' ~ "
!! . I!! .; 51 ~
¡
I.
....
:~
.
......
~:
;¥
-1..·/.. ·1.. · " .\.~
: ~ ~ ' 8; .... ~M Ä P . L
a:. A-'I , ~ ~~ __ _
I~ ~ 11/ ~ ~'>- ..~
t ç~ b ~ ~ In ~ ~\û~ ~~
= s¡ t ~ ~ I ~" - pft 'a~1
~ ºIII 'I-- ... -,In
· ('I' !I ~ Ie Õ ... r---t'I. ~ _ \\
N ...-1 t- .: I-- ... /p
III III ~Ii ~~
.." ; ~ ~
N I'- .
o po---. I'---
~ ~
s.'f ~()~~r-
,
J! N
:s~
.....
J!.
.
2~
!N
(T) .. ~
...
-
~
"N
'0
!.
2
to ftDG)f
i~
..
a..;
i~
!:
;~
.,
!fti
9 ~I ¡~
!' ~ ...
" !~
,
..---
I
t«J Aim A
~¥
2¥ I J!..
~¥
¥ J!N !5 b
~ (¡ i¥
- !..
~ë ~
;~ Ii
Þ-_ --E
~ i¥ j
u~ ...
!~ !:
N ~
~~I
!~
N'l 'iw ""
!
.
.
....
In
~
'"
'"
~
.....
~ l
~:I
!.
I
I
I
J¥
Æ:
~~N
'1~
":I:.
\-
~
CD
~~
·ø
Æ..
...
!~
.~
Æ·
N
Î¥
!N
,
\
i¥
!N
IB~
'N
!'
~
i¥
~N
.. I
r--- .... . In,
. N
~
... ! ~
P'-
,.. ~
r--- ~ =
::
!
~
!
.
rJ
.
~ {
!
¿gU\
~ \"'\0
~ CD\ù~
? .~...
C~\
-iU\c,
\\
II~
·W
Æ'
a
I
dL
,...--.
~~
ÆN
,
I
I
1:'
~
A
\11 / : /! . . ,,/.
'" /"'/ ~ /In ,.. ,../.
.. .. .. ful" .. ..
.*../../-
.LS )fWO 03ti
~J !: / 2
~W ;:;
:
! . . ,.. ..
. . ,.. .. ¡.,
v
....
! : ~ :: ~
.....-
....~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
en
~.~
t- .... ¡=: -
Zo d5 0::) ..~
L&J- C/)...
~ ..J en ..J!!:
om C :d 5
C ::::> t- « c J: en
za..c( « 0 ~
~~~~~~~!
~....~ J:Z
o 0a::Q: >- >- 0 f
J: L&J - :I
(I) (I) ~ ~.l&J l&J 0:: 0
x o· ~en en::J:~
~ 2>c(w.o:,o:~'~
~ ,,0: ~ ~.::)::) 3 I:J
(I) Q.Ocn m m z ~
I ~.
J I ;
I'
II
I
I~
"1 ~,
\
. ,·w
=~I·
-I!¡
E
~
~
~
~~
~~
~~
I~
f /w
:. ,. !
~ l:..1
. , .~..
:l /' ¡
, '1'
.,'
,g I ·"2
M ..12,12 .ON
I
en
>-
YJ
>
Q:
2:;)
0U)
~ca
o~
1.Uct:
..JO
~~
o
u
(t1
I
~
Z 1--'
~;~ 0
~- ..J ~
- L
C:\ u
C:) ~
<!
,,;
1ft
..
a.~
.:
4ft
t
'.
.
1ft
~
o
>
W to
-I
.~, 1-
> 0
'V '..J
...,-
<1:'
()
10
"ON
'-#1
(:~.. . ....,'-": :,",- . .
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
- z"~
Sc4/e: /11 = 30 I
PROF? S. ¡,J·B.
e.~M¡:
1m
~
c::.
~
~~
~
~
.~
~~
~C
»
\J
Curve
No.
I
Z
..3
4
6
(,
C()
ð
R
L
15".59'.5211 ~ It3Z 57/ .52. ~7'
ogðð'ltI" / ð7. 57' IfI. ð'Z ,
O'!)-Z7' ~7/' /137.57/ '3tJ.I!j"
0'- Ot!/44" 7iß./5' 15:3l!J I
OZ-'tJ 'f!¡ð" 7(P~.13 / 2~. ~ /
14-Z0'ð7" /~Z.57' 48./8'
LINE. /ð€ARIN~ DISTANCES
/ N8~"2~/Q?'1 W 7. 7!> '
2 NVXJ047 '451' ~ 5.0Z. I
.3 S8!)() 2~ '00"& 11ð() . .35
4 Nð,!)" Z~'oOI'W 20/. 4/'
5 Nð!J-!5315011 € 324.úo I
ÚJ 5 ð!J-S3' ~()"W .3¿'~. .3.5 1- -
7 :5 00° /4 4!)" e /. 2f¿, I
\ 8 It! 00° Z/' Z/' W 7.0~1
\
/>
\
\
\
JONES & BOYD. INC.
GONSUln~~G ENGINEERS
16980 DaIos Ptlrtnray, Sur1e 100
DaIae., Texas 1:S248
214-~-1676
S:i! 3/7
'"
~
¡:::~
~\t\
~~~.
~ e\"'ct
h. -tt) .
"(,JI\)
~~~
~'-Ì
~~
<:)-
~
E~Hte>\T · A ..
\f')
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
- ,....
~-t
o~
fj
- ;t:
:5CAlé: IN:!Jð'
m
'to
fP
tv J..
~fJ
'1)0
Po.ð.
:::::::-
P/eOr? 5. t./. ð.
e6HT .
~
Q
(~ \l.J
~
~() ~
~
~ ~
~ """
-....J
ß ~ "-
~c ~
.~ \)
~a
~
~
\~.
()
0
~
<;:)~
~'"
......
~~~
~e\'l
\lJ.\j
~~~
~~
~~
~~
CONC. O~/Vé
~
<t.
c
\\L
'r-
~
\()
~
::J
~
JONES I BOYD. INC.
CONSUlTING ENGJNEERS
16980 DaIle, PwtIwey. Suite 00
DoI_. r.... ~24.
214-248..1678
sz 3/7
(
:::t \I.J
~ ~
\) ~
~ \(
~ ~
~~~
~ ......,
V)
~
~
\
~
. "
e.~~te'T e
-
\1\
-
i
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II 4IÞ 13-21-87-6000
Calloway Branch, Ph.I
I Construction
I
I
I
I
I
I Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
4IÞ Operating Budge
I Othe
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
.epartment: Public Works/utilities
~ Approve Flnal Pay Estlmate No. 10 In the Amount
- ~ubject: of $21,184.79 to M.A. Vinson Construction Co. for Agenda Number: PAY 90-20
Calloway Branch Dralnage Channel Improvements, Phase I
Council Meeting Date: 10/08/90
The ClP project was awarded by Council on August 14, 1990 for $424,393.00 to M.A.
Vinson Construction Company. Final payment to the Contractor will make his total
earnings on the project $423,695.71.
The Contractor substantially completed this project on June 12, 1990. The project was
completed in 240 calendar days versus the 180 days bid. Due to an abnormal amount of
wet weather during the construction period, the bid time was extended considerably.
Though 7 days of delay cannot be attributed to wet weather, staff does not recommend
liquidated damages. The Contractor did several tasks not required by contract. The
Contractor cleared the box culvert at Glenview Drive of sediment twice, cleared
sediment from the box culvert under Booth Calloway, and restablized approximately 200
linear feet of the east channel slope upstream of the north end of the project.
The project is now totally complete with all final adjustments having been made.
Funding Source:
Budget
Total
Expenditure
Transfer to
Drainage
Unspecified
Transfer to
utility
Unspecified
$417,456.00
$399,122.21
$18,333.79
02-09-84-6000
Calloway Branch, Ph. I
Sewer Construction
Totals
$ 34,000.00
$451,456.00
$ 24,573.50
$423,695.71
$18,333.79
$9,426.50
$9,426.50
Recommendation:
The staff recommends Council approve final payment to M.A. Vinson Construction Company
in the amount of $21,184.79 and the transfer of funds.
Finance Review
GO/REV
,Finance Director
ment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
~
City Manager
Page 1 of 1
I
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~
!;~ ¡ -~ .~;:-"":.
: :\ , L~~~ ~ . ..~ _ _ " .
i ~ ~ .-~--"'--._-""~-~_._'"
: J I
...... .1
~~ ? ~ ~ccn
..j t....\- v h...... ~f..J
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
September 26, 1990
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: 3-349, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
CALLOWAY BRANCH DRAINAGE CHANNEL IMPROVTS., PH. 1
CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIM. NO. 10 & FINAL
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 10 & Final,
dated September 17, 1990, made payable to M.A. Vinson Construction Co., in
the amount of $21,184.79, for materials furnished and work performed on the
referenced project as of August 31, 1990.
This project includes concrete channel liner construction on the Calloway
Branch Channel from Glenview Drive northward beyond Booth Calloway Drive.
The quantities and conditions of the project have been verified on-site by
your representative, Mr. Ken Matheson, as indicated by his signature on the
estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
Based on as-built quantities and contract unit prices, Contractor earnings
total $423,695.71, which is $697.29 under the contract amount of
$424,393.00. The work order date was October 9, 1989, the scheduled
completion date was April 7, 1990, and the project was substantially
complete on June 12, 1990. The project was completed in 240 calendar days,
which is 60 days over the contract completion time of 180 calendar days.
The contractor is requesting an additional 53 days due to weather delays,
(see attached letters dated March 5, and May 10, 1990). The contract
completion time overrun is therefore 60 - 53 = 7 calendar days. Liquidated
damages for this contract are $200 per day, or 200 X 7 = $1,400. However,
we are not aware of any flooding or other problems caused by the
construction delay, and therefore, we do not recommend assessment of these
liquidated damages to the Contractor for this project.
The two year period of maintenance begins on this date, and therefore, will
terminate on September 25, 1992. The maintenance bond includes sealing of
cracks, repair of buckling or other failures, along with failure of all
concrete channel liner, flatwork and other concrete structures.
Continued next page
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 26, 1990
Calloway Branch, Phase I
Page
2
After the Contractor has furnished an affidavit verifying that all bills
have been paid, and in the absence of any negative test reports, we
recommend that this final payment, in amount of $21,184.79, be made to
M.A. Vinson Construction Co., P.O. Box 185577, Fort Vorth, Texas 76181.
Ve will be present at the October 8, 1990, Council meeting to answer any
questions you may have concerning this project.
~w.~
RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E.
RVA/bvg/f3349119
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works
M.A. Vinson Construction Company
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
o II
Q)clI
Q)Q)II
-œll
'-II
a.. , II
WZII
en~1I
- ~ I
,.... -
-co
œ 0
~
M
_ "0
M c:
W
o "0
Z..o
CÞ·-
.0-'-
0".
~Ca..
o
o
z
CÞ
ftI
E
cø
W
cø
o
-x
ua..
..
-en
c:....
o~
u>
a:
a..
~
..J
W
Z
Z
<
:t:
U
W
~
. <
· z
· - 0
<0
t-a:
a:cc
o 0
a.. J: .-
wo-
a:zu
a:=-
enCD'-
:J
t->tO
«c
~~8
..J
t-..JC
Octo
wOtO
~ c:
o .. .-
a:c>
a.. 0
z-<
~ .~:Ë
t-'-
Ou
~tO
a:.
t-oo
(f)
z-u
Ou..
oe'-
· 0 C
~
a:-
0-
a: a:
ww
>0
OZ
~
....>
-I t-
~....
CDZ
,<
en~
<0
....>
U....
<-
a:....
....z
z<
O::J
00
w
....0
za:
::Ja..
a:
........
ZZ
O::J
o~
.<
....
o
....
....
enw
0....
0<
C
..J
<0
........
o
t-
a: a:
ww
>0
oz
~
....
en a:
00
o
t-w
z....
ww
u-'
a: a..
~~
o
....
z
~
Z
o
f-
a..
a:
o
en
w
o
~
w
....
. I
Q'
0000000000
0000000000
OOOOMOOOOO
",,....cooooooooo
œM.~-~CO&nMO
COOCOM'" 00 M
N-N
-N
00-0000000
0--0000000
OCO.OOONOOO
"'M-O-O-OOO
œ~œ"lllLf'-.-~MO
COQ)NM&n" M
NOM
-N
00-0000000
OCD-OOOOOOO
OM~OMOOOOOO
M ~ ""- co
CD ~ I "IIILf'
_ co
o~&noœooooo
o-OOO&nOOOOO
OCÐNOCOONOOO
OCDOOO)OO)OOO
OOCDOOOOOOO
OM-OOOOOOO
OMCOOOONOOO
, M 0»
OOCDOOOOOOO
0"-0000000
OCOCOOOOCO--_
OCO"NO-O
œMM " N
~ N
0000000000
0000000000
0000000-__
OCD.N--O
œMM " .
. N
oooooo&nOOO
&nOOOMO"OOO
&nMœo,....o,,"-ooo
coco,.... ~ 000
N-- "'MO
M
en
....
z
.3: ~
»»Ou.u.enenen w
·ct >
UUOOW-l-l-l-l-l 0
a:
a..
u ,,~
. c a. E
uOE CD
co.. w
co a: "CÞ ~
OO~ ~u <
E enc: z
-~'-u ftI
"E-u ~~ <
>"Ce( CI -0 0:
"LL~ to U e- 0
u .cþ C
)(1 I u- e e"e( ..J
WOc(co u.-en <
I I 03: ftI CÞ f-
- ·0 .¥CJ.c OJ 0
e - - a.o. c u.. t-
cOO"O eo·- a.c c
c E eO:-I E e·-
.. - -'-~ ftI....
.c--LL . c:a:f-"
o en UJ . ew·- C
a. 0- I ...-.. to
c( .- 0 .c to c
-OOt 0 O.·-u
UOO t u...
CeDO-t co.. u..-
::J(W')C")O(W')-coct02
0000000000
-NM "IIILf'&n co ""-00 CÐ 0
o
o
00000
00000
M
co
00000
0000&1)0
Nœ-o»o
OO"M N
""'
CÐ
M
N
00000
o~ooo
N
N
"""COOOO
o M co &n
-M-O)
CO.M
œ
œ
M
N
00000
o&nooo
MMOOO
œco 0
0""' 0
N _ N
I t
0)
~
œ
M
00000
,,",&nooo
aoooOOO
000000
00000
00000
MMOO-
NN t
I I
00000
00000
""N-O
" ,....
00000
00000
OON__
00
NN
00000
o&nooo
-~OOO
œNœ~o
"'CDe
N
.J:
u.u.uenen
·ct
-I-'w-,-,
CD
"u
Ec:
CD- CD..
a.c ~
CÞ cøo
a. E . >--
CÞ-en-
"0 c(
CD ftI.c >-
~uC-E
CÞc:...CI
enw2--
ew"
. CD .. en >-
c:- CI en
ftle~.c
en....eu
uencen
. c: CÞ
cwo ·"en
.- 0 c....
o ca
. en . u
t en (I).
.
N(/)"'" (I) 2
en en en enCJ)
- N M . &n
en
....
z
~
w
>
o
a:
0..
~
a:
~
W
CJ)
>-
a:
c(
t-
Z
<
en
-'
<
....
o
....
o
o
o
M
N
0)
N
o
U')
M
,.....
U')
...,.
N
o
&n
co
U')
co
..
t
o
o
M
0)
M
..
N
..
"
""-
&n
0)
co
M
N
..
U')
en
co
M
N
..
CÐ
N
0)
N-
eb
,..... OJ
O)ftI
coc
I
"
0)
CO
I
.05
00
·en
0)'-
CÐCD
'1:J
en
....
z
~
w
>
o
a:
0..
~
....
wen
....w
<
oz
00
....0
w
en en
OC(
ZIXl
Zt-
a:z
<~
w~
a:c(
o
t-f-
UO
C(C(
0:0:
........
zz
00
00
u.
o
t-
Z
~
~
c(
-I
<
....
o
t-
-I -I
c(c(
........
00
........
o
o
-0
N&n
M
0)
M
..
N
..
NM
N"
- &I)
CÐ .
CÐN
M
.. en
-0
"0
o
u..
CD
CD~
CtCÞ
ftlen
c
CU
ewc
...ftI
oen
CD
a:
o (f)
CO (f)
I
M
M
o
eb
at
C
cu
J::.
o
c-
.- a.
CUE
Eo
CÞO
a:
u
c:
enu
~...
CUCÞ
00.
en
w
o
a:
0..
t-
Z
::J
o
Z
c(
en
w
t-
....
Z
<
::J
o
o
w
....
e(
~
00
00 .
-N
CD.
E-
.- ew
....0
·0
c:....
o
u....
CD
ftI
CÞO
ftI
0-
a.
..e
ClO
'1:10
'-
o
'0
.¥CÞ
....c
Ou
~en
0»0
00 CD
CÞ CÞ
, ,
....0:
g~
I I
CD ,....
D.t.1 M."'eh 5, ,
TOI Mr. K.~ M4th1e.o~, Pub11Q wO~kl Insp.Q~or, '
City o~ No~t~ RiQhl.~d Hil~S
R.I C~LLOWAV BRANCH PHASE I & rr.
I REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
I
D.a~ ei~, !
Ou. to t"_ ~Htend.d period .~ ...et ~.t~y w.ath.~ I would like t~
SUbMit an ewtension o~ time ~.qu.st ~o~ th. Calloway Ð~a~Qh Ph... r
and II" proJeQts. DU"'i~g the pa.t 7 we.ks it has ....i~..d Ol..ct both' th.
proJ~t. 1 to 2 days p.'" week "it" at l..at 1 toe d.y. addttio.,.al p....: '
week fa... drying a~d creek ..ttling baek to normal flow Qonditions '
, On the calloway phase II. øtoJ.Qt there w.s al.o an additional
delay eau.ed by T.U. elect...ic, !S.W. Sell t.leþhone .nd Sammons
Q4ble in removing their lin.. '...om . pOle in the way of the eh.nnel
to Ii 1"1"'" pole ....st of tt,.Þ chan",e1. my b....akdown 01' defays and the
I
AMount of time extension røque.ted i. .. ~ollow..
I
I
,
I
I
RAIN
RAIN I
RAIN/DRVING
RAIN/DAVING. !
RAIN I
RA.%N/DRVING I
RAIN I
RAIN/DRVING I
DRVINa
RAIN
DRYING
DRVING
RAIN
~AIN
DRYING
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
-:IAN
JAN
JAN
JAN
.rAN
FEB
FEB
FEB
FEB
FED
FED
FEe
FEEl
MAR
MAR
TOT~L.I
"
. o¿ì~M~ø¡y
D lJ~ClD
-..
M.A.VINSON CONSTRUCTION CO. ,INC.
Ø.O.80)(~ 1SSS77
FT.WORTH,rX 76181
<817> 84-9802
METRO (817) 89-e094
. ~·JI
It:· ~ OJ
,. .
DATE
CALL.OWAY BRANCH
PHASE I
CRLLOW~V BRANCH
PHASE IIR
16
17
18
19
31
1
'9
14
1~
21
RAIN
RAIN/DRVINB
RAIN/DRVING
R~IN
RAIN
RAIN/DRVING
RAIN
RAIN/DRYING
ÐRVING
RAIN
DRVING
DRVING'
RAIN
RAIN
DRYING
r
(
. I
22
23
28
1
2
¡
I
I
2::3 ~DDITIONAL DAYS (CAL> WEATI-IEfh 23 ADDITIONAL-DAYS (CAL>
UTILITY CONFLICTS. 10 ADDITIONAL D~VS (CAL'),
You... att.",tion to tntta "que.t 1. A"øt"et:i.ted tI~dt' you'.
need A~y o~h.... in'Ot"Mation o~, ¡, you ".~. .nyqu..ttc~.·pl.a.. call
I
I
, Vi .....,on ,
PrCiJ.~'t ·M."'.g.~
~M"'. a....g D1Qk.~. P. E.
D1~.etor of Publ1~ Wo~k.
City 0' No~th Ri~hl.nd Hi! .
I
, .
S tllI~TAAJr. .&,yJI'¿. i7#
14' .. ~1. ~9 D:
~.
-.. "'.",. - -... ...... ...."
I
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
,I
.... ....... .............. ~,.,_...~ .......' .. .... <.,. ... .,.
,...."'~
. ... -. ........ ~
~
,
. .
.,.
M.~.VINSON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
P.O.80X 185577
~T.WORTH,TX 76181
(817) 284-9802
MET~O (817) 589-2094
Date: May 10, 1990
Tc.: ~r.
Ke~ ~~thi@son, Public Works Insp&ctor,
City of 'North Richland Hillg
R.I CALLOWAY BR~NCH PH~SE I & IIa
REQUEST ~OR EXT~NSION O~ TIME
NO. 2
Dea..~ S i ,..,
Due ~o ~h~ e~tended geriod of ~@t rai~y w@Athe~ I would like to
§'_Ibmlt an tl'xt.nsion of tiMIf I"'E'OUE'st ro...... thlil CaLloway Br~nC'h PhASEi' r
~nd IIa proJects. During the past 9 week5 it has rained out bQth the
orOJects Tor d"Y$ and week5 a.t a time wi th e)(tli.'~ óed periods to s110w
channel to settle back to warkabl~ flow CO~ditions.
My breakdown of thv delays ~ye to 'the un@)(oected1y heðvy ~ai~~all
and the amount of tim. extension requ..ted is ðS follows:
DATE C~LLOWQV SRt:aNCJ.f CØLLOWAV BRANCH
PHASE I PHØSE II~
MQR 5 RRIN R~IN
MAR 6 R~IN R~IN
MAR 7 RAIN RAIN
M~R 8 R~IN ~A:rN
M~R 9 RAIN/DAVING RAIN/DRYING
MAR 10 RRIN RAIN
MA~ 12 TOO WET TOO wET
MAR 13 TOO WET TOO WET
M~R 14 TOO WET TOO WET
MAR 26 RAIN RRIN
MAR 27 RAIN/DRYING RAIN/D~VING
~AR a8 RAIN/DRYING RAIN/DRYING
M~R 29 R~IN R~IN
MAR 30 DRVING DRYING
APR 6 RAIN R~IN
~PR 10 A~IN RAIN
~DR 13 RRIN R~IN
~PR 19 RRIN R~IN
~øq t20 RAIN RAIN
AØR 24 RAIN R~IN
~ø~ ~s R~IN RAIN
~ø~ 2& RAIN RQIN
~ø~ 27 RAIN/DRVING R~IN/DRYING
M~V 1 R~%N R~IN
MAY 2 RRIN/FLOODING RAIN/FLOODING
M~V 3 RAIN/FLOODING R~IN/FLOODING
...
I
I - ~
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I;
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
09/26/T990 08147
..
FROM M.A.UINSON CONST. co.
p.e3
TO
During tne øast 9 weeks th. rains have also caused la~ge
â\I'.10U)'\'tY. o~ dir't t"'ewo~k .a~d re'f111 on eMbankrnønts "net slopes wlthin
'the pro.JRct limitss ~Yld in or.. i~stanc. on c:allo....y PHASE IIa
the amount 0' water ~lowi~g dONn the eh.~nel destroyed 140 L.F.
OT sa' wide concr.te (bo~tom) which had to removed and replåced
eausi~º aaditio~al delays that we~e beyond Our cont~ol.
AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL TIME REQUESTED.
PHASe: I:
TQTAL: 30 ADDITIONAL D~YS (C~L)
PHASE ¡lAI
TOTAL: 34 ~DDITIONAL DAYS (CAL)
Your attention to tnis r@qU9S~ is appreciated and if you
need a~y additional in~ormation or, if you have any ~u.stion$
please call.
~~~
T.A. Vinson
ProJect Managfir
xc: Mr. Greg Dickø~s P.E.
Director of Publie Works
City of No~tM Richland Hills