HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1989-01-23 Agendas
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
JANUARY 23, 1989 - 5:45 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 Northeast Loop 820.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1. GN 89-07 General Fund - 1987/88 Year End
Adjustments (Agenda Item No. 16)
and
IR 89-05 Condition of the Operating
Budget for Fiscal Year 1988/89
(15 Minutes)
2. IR 89-04 City Street Overlay Program 1989
(10 Minutes)
3. PS 87-45 Request of Collins Investments
for Replat of Lots 5 and 6,
Block 1, North Hills Village
Addition (Agenda Item No.7) (10
Minutes)
4. PS 88-34 Request of William and Alisa
Nelms for Final Plat of Lot 1,
Block 1, Nelms Addition (Agenda
Item No. 10) (5 Minutes)
5. PS 88-35 Request of Richmond Bay for
Final Plat of Lots 20-24, Block
10, and Lot 1, Block 11 Meadow
Lakes Addition (Phase III)
(Agenda Item No. 11) (10 Minutes)
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
6. GN 89-06 Public Hearing - Community
Development Block Grant -
Resolution No. 89-5 (Agenda Item
No. 15) (5 Minutes)
7. PU 89-06 Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way
from Dollie England for the
Purpose of Constructing
Smithfield Road Sidewalk (Agenda
Item No. 18) (5 Minutes)
8. Items on Consent Agenda not on
Pre-Council - Items No.8, 9,
12, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, & 21) (5
Minutes)
9. Possible Work Session (5 Minutes)
10. Other Items (5 Minutes)
11. *Executive Session (20 Minutes)
a. Personnel
b. Briefing on Pending
Litigation
c. Review of Progress 'on Land
Acquisition
12. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m.
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the
Open Meetings Law. If any action is
contemplated, it will be taken in open session.
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JANUARY 23, 1989
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda
for discussion and/or action.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting January 9,
1989
5. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda
6. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk
(7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18,
19, 20, & 21)
* 7. PS 87-45 Request of Collins Investments
for Replat of Lots 5 and 6, Block
1, North Hills Village Addition
(Located at Southwest
Intersection of Loop "820 and
State Highway 26)
* 8. PS 88-30 Request of Marvin D. Smith for
. Final Plat of Lots 8 and 9, Block
5 Maroaks Addition (Located on
Lincoln Drive)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
* 9. PS 88-31 Request of Richmond Bay for
Replat of Lots 13R-16R, Block 10,
Meadow Lakes Addition (Located on
South Side of Meadow lakes Drive)
*10. PS 88-34 Request of William and Alisa
Nelms for Final Plat of Lot 1,
Block 1, Nelms Addition (located
on East Side of Crane Road)
*11. PS 88-35 Request of Richmond Bay for Final
Plat of Lots 20-24, Block 10, and
lot 1, Block 11 Meadow lakes
Addition (Phase III) (Located on
Proposed Extension of Skylark
Circle)
*12. PS 88-36 Request of Richmond Bay for Final
Plat of Lots 25-35, Block 10 and
lots 2-17, Block 11, Meadow lakes
Addition (Phase IV) (Located on
the Proposed Extension of Skylark
Circle)
*13. PS 88-37 Request of Richmond Bay for Final
Plat of lots 36-43, Block 10,
Lots 18-20, Block 11, and Lots
1-3, Block 13, Meadow lakes
. Addition (Phase V) (Located on
Skylark Circle)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 3
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*14. GN 89-05 Authorization of Signatures for
Unmarked License Plates -
Resolution No. 89-4
15. GN 89-06 Public Hearing - Community
Development Block Grant -
Resolution No. 89-5
*16. GN 89-07 General Fund - 1987/88 Year End
Adjustments
*17. GN 89-08 Designation of One-Way Traffic on
Little Ranch Road - Ordinance No.
1592
*18. PU 89-06 Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way
from Dollie England for the
Purpose of Constructing
Smithfield Road Sidewalk
*19. PW 89-03 Approval of Martin Drive Paving
and Drainage Improvements -
Change Order No.2
*20. PW 89-04 Approval of Martin Drive Paving
and Drainage Improvements -
Change Order No. 3
*21. PAY 89-0l Approve Final Pay Estimate #9 in
the Amount of $23,467.08 to
Austin Paving - Hightower Drive
Street & Drainage Improvements
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 4
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
22. Citizens Presentation
23. Adjournment
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
~~
c:::::::: Ie
1'r
No.
IR 89-05
Date: January 21, 1989
Subject: Condition of the Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 1988/89
The following is an advisory report to the City Council on the operating
budget for fiscal year 1988/89. Although it is too early in the fiscal
year to be conclusive, all funds appear to be perfonning as expected in
revenues and expenditures with the exception of the Self Insurance Fund.
The Self Insurance Fund was established in July of 1987; therefore, the
fiscal year just canpleted was its first full year of operation. It
appears, based on actual costs for fiscal year 1987/88 as opposed to
estimated expenses, that the budget appropriation for fiscal year 1988/89
may not be sufficient. It is too early to tell if cut-backs in the
General Fund will be necessary to compensate for this potential
shortfall. The estimated additional costs can probably be absorbed in
the Utility and Management Services.
The contributions fran the General, Utili ty and Management Services Funds
include funds for health, workers canpensation and general liability, plus
reserves to pay outstanding claims at year end and principal and interest
loan repayment to the Utili ty Fund. One option for reducing the required
annual transfers would be to treat the original amounts transferred to
the Self Insurance Fund as a contribution of capital instead of a loan.
This would reduce the required transfers by appro~imately $170,000.
The preliminary estimates for the projected shortfall can be attributed
to the following areas:
General
Fund
Utility Management
Fund Services
$ 24,000 $ ---
5,000 --
24,000 ---
36,000 115,000
39,100 51,000
$128,100 $166,000
Employee Health
Dependant Heal th
Workers Canpensation
General Liability
loan Repayment
$119,000
30,000
13,000
13,000
79,900 J
$259,900
Tbtal Distribution
Total
All Funds
I í" 6' '~~-:::>
~
$554,000
less loan Repayment
$170,000
~t Possible OVerage
$384,000
~ ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICH LAND HilLS, TEXAS
I"
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
r
I;
We will continue to monitor the situation on a monthly basis and will
keep City Council apprised. '!be options that now appear to be available
are a reduction in the General Fund operating budget or a transfer of
excess earnings if the present early indication of a General Fund revenue
over collection hold true.
Respectfully sub:nitted,
--£;] 77l~, a~J
Lee Maness
Director of Finance
IM/cs
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i'
I
No. IR 89-03
Date: January 21, 1989
Subject: Tarrant County Housing Finance Corporation
At the City Council meeting on January 9th, the Council requested
infonnation about the number of North Richland Hills residents who
participated in the last Tarrant Housing Finance Corporation loan
progr~, which was approved in 1987 ~
The Administrator, Ms. Patty Oherts of IDmas and Nettleton, infonœd us
that 22 residents of North Richland Hills qualified for loans in the 1987
program, which averaged $60,000 eß.ch or a total of approximately
$1,320,000.
Respectfully submitted,
--ße ~'~.c~ /
lee Maness
Director of Finance
IM./cs
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICH LAND HillS. TEXAS
I·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
,
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. TR RQ-04
~
-c:::::::::::: )(
~
Date: January 18, 1989
Subject: City Street Overlay Program 1989
Listed below is the Public Works Department proposed "street overlay program" for
1989. The City crews could accomplish more miles of overall this season, but
funds have not been budgeted to allow anymore to be done than the aIIDunt shown.
Revenue Available:
1. 1988-89 Budget for 01-60-04-3080
2. Transfers fran Water and Sewer Budget
for Street Repair of Utility CUts
$ 280,000
$ 80,000
Total Revenue Available
$ 360,000
Expenditures:
1. Estimated Regular Maintenance Cost
(patching, crack sealing, drainage
channel ma.intenance, etc.)
$22,900/mo x 12 mos.
$ 274,800
$ 85,200
$ 360,000
2 . Proposed Over lay Program
Total Estimated Expenditures
PROPOSED OVERLAY PROGRAM COST SUMMARY
Street Length OVerlay
RUFE SNOW DR.; Glenview 600 ' $ 6, 750
Dr. to Mike Street
CUrb/Base Total
$ 11,500 $ 18,250
3,350 6,350
8,820 21,340
BLACKFOOT TR.; Airport 400 ' 3,000
Frwy to Bedford-Euless Rd.
COLORADO BLVD; Bedford- 1,615'
Euless Rd. to Grapevine
Hwy
12,520
, GROVE ST; Bedford-Euless
Rd. to Lazy Lane
725'
5,440 4,610 10,050
5,440 1,500 6,940
2,000 2,070 4,070
lAURA ST; Grove St. to
Ash St.
725'
MIKE cr; Scott St. to
dead end
200'
- ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
NORTH RICH LAND HillS, TEXAS
I·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
,I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Street Lenqth OVerlay CUrb/Base Total
BLANEY AVE ¡ Shauna Dr. 600' $ 4,050 $ 2,820 $ 6,870
to ~1arilyn Ln.
HOLLAND ST¡ Onyx Dr. N. 1,500' 11,250 250 11,500
to Billie Faye St.
Totals 6,365' $ 50,450 $ 34,920 $ 85,370
or 1.2 miles
k s
ic Works/Utilities
GID / ds
"---1
.--
~ICHLAND
HIGH
SCHOOL
-..?NGER. HA
-.....
----
(--J
!:í' ,':\'\~o/ 'G--'~~\~~-'~~~ \ ~,b' -Jfi_~~~~ ~ ~'('''~~''I T~ ~- -
:J \ . ' ~D tL,lc ' -1~' .b=t~ II. · L I , , _: ¡
--:\:.,,; . ,~ 'M T~~ ¡; ! ' I I' ' ! 1 'I trl, _"O..'A. waY -, ~:
Ij 1 '- " .' ~ ~ I A \ "I : I' ! ,'I I r i
_ ....., , _ H' ' tu~ jTr ,. I ~ l> C r THOJol.S E~E" L":O,r---_-:
'/\ ,I ~~ ~~d ,tJ-1FPn~~~' -
?I' mJ,~~=-t'l ::::1rl~?h -- I I i I I i 1- i-~' '; 1 ¡ .H1 .:",,~. :",-: =!8 ~'O HI<" W~Y '\
\ / " "nl U 1 - - .' ~- . ~
--' - - - .. ,~
~I F==, cr- ~~ -- : - - "> :~ 01 Y ~ I : I .0A,eH PAA' - : \ I
.. ~ ~~_ ' '_" ~U..: ~.--+- ~ L...L I JEll ¡ I 11 11 n,' ! -
'.1~J-' _ '\ \ ..... -.2= --'I'~...-,---~. )H /
.:=~ I JI\ " /' ; '-- [~~ r{;~ s=:~" '~U ~ (II
__ -.-no -- ~ VP'-' I
J "'--'[t \ ¡Ii : 1 \ .- ' '--- '------E~ 1 §!=o m:=.-. I
\ I T T \ \ ~t:::= ~ I II ~ p
___ = OAIV£ _ ,~. -- "', :!i¡
'>"_ ~' ~l::t:'r II :; · T I 1 1 I >- \-=--ê-- ~~ · ~ ~E~ ~
\y y'- HOUOAY fil 'II, l"k L--- ~ =:iI.:'---==~ I =1ffi3~ ~
v'\ / .2. . ....... ΠIr '- I -< ....-i ~
, ! /. "C HE.GHTS L' : 'T ,f .. ~ ':-:j L-J---.----J..~-----
~1f1i í r,.}- ElE" L 'i, ~,~,: i ¡; I 1§8- 'aJ°~) 1"':~ AS
Þí 7"f>F ... .£Al.",,-,-,- .... :> hl J ~__ . "
I II T ~' 111'1 'I 1, i
J 111111111 I T1_1 ,"IT ~~A~IL-~rD ""'5':....., Æ1 .
~.I,I~ ¡:::::- ~ ~¡t!JA_a- -- _ I ~' ,- - ~ / -' Œ, I
~ ~ê:-~~ "-'~ "-~ =~ ~ Ë 0' O'~ "\ ' r : ,'--- v , 'D" '
~ 1." "-t'-r- I ~t£ ~; .- i -~ / /\l0 -, c, '~
.~. ~~~~2iL' ;§~~ 0 !iL \ )II! n III ¡i B r:':' I( ,I ;-.. ~~~ G/CY1 ' Icl~-. -- l \.
. \-~.H ~"- ~ i--- ~ I ~I P"cE",OI!"" ,[ I /j .' -, I
\ _ _ =- t=: == ~ I I í T ~ 1 ~-- - - -4 I
" _. _.' ~ ~ ~ t- ~ l _ L I l 1 ~ :::..--- ~ I ! I
" .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "'~_ I If 111 -- - ' .'
_ '= == ¡ f--f- ¡¡: ~ ~ ¡ l ,T T "-~ ~... I- .
, -l'~'l~~;~~~Lì!'A -- -1. I...., \> :'1 :~ ~~. ~_. :' \ :...- "T\!
- \ - ;:::-... - <--- --' - .-'
'-::; __~~ ~s~ ~_,../ ~ --:--. f": ~ < ,i i i L",
~ ~- I ~A ~ ~- .- ! ' - .. ~- -..., , ---
t" =-~__ '- __ ......:. -~- IX__ - ~ ~ - !. ~
~ __ - ~ '----- I- ~ .. > - ~' ~ -- '.
_ >--"- ~_ : . , '/ ' iI r· . I', i a:1 I . .....
r-"-'" I-- '" '( < ~ - -- - þ ~,:;-¡ , I ,y ,
\>- SA" L \ v,"' r ~~_
\ HUOI8U.. (~~I j 13-¡.. ¡Ion Aì...,! I \ ~ ~ -"~ · _--..r-1 þ - /' ~ )
0"'" -w-~
--
-
~~
~'
,<"
~
v
/\\
\v. /
'\ '
" '
Y.
=
kIGk\l\'A)'
,/
¡,/
;'
l
i:
r
~
'---
... . , I
.-'
I
,[ .
~
\J_~
..~
.~,'\ :
~^~ ~, If-J
I)~. ; ,,'SS~
1\\ ~ . Cqr~ ~
. --.:- . PA RI\
i~~_ ~_. ;:-.:__
'- i ~.J ~~
Ì=i ~,. ~'.'~, \ \.......
L':] t\ ' \'. ~,' f'
.P ~', ,:\ " r;
i~' '~ , \ "".\' "." ~~"
.~, .-':., f\\' 'I \.'~"' " '\
c: 'L ___J~, \~ \'\
:~ ~- ..': \ \ ~'------;7
'";; ..~ ./
~
---
I'~'O""
I
II
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - JANUARY 9, 1989 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting to order January 9, 1989, at 7:30 p.m.
2.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Tommy Brown Mayor
Richard Davis Mayor Pro Tern
Lyle E. Welch Councilman
Mack Garvin Councilman
Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman
Byron Sibbet Councilman
Linda Spurlock Councilwoman
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Rewis
Rex McEntire
Greg Dickens
Absent:
Virginia Moody
City Manager
Senior Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
Director of Public Works/Utility
Councilwoman
3.
INVOCATION
Councilman Welch gave the invocation.
Mayor Brown advised that the applicant for PZ 88-21, Agenda Item No.9,
had requested a postponement. Mayor Brown advised the case would be heard
February 13, 1989.
4.
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING DECEMBER 8, 1988
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the
minutes of the December 8, 1988 meeting.
Motion carried 6-0.
5.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1988
APPROVED
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
Ie
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
January 9, 1989
Page 2
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the
minutes of the December 12, 1988 meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Davis advised the
minutes stated Mayor Brown called the meeting to order and it should be
Mayor Pro Tem Davis.
Motion to approve the minutes as corrected carried 6-0.
6.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Pro Tern Davis removed Item No. 17 from the Consent Agenda.
7.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, & 27)
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the
Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 6-0.
* 8.
PZ 88-6 REQUEST OF AMERICITY CORP. FOR APPEAL HEARING
GRANTED
9.
PZ 88-21 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING _
REQUEST OF J.B. JOHNSTON TO REZONE LOTS lR AND 2R, BLOCK 6,
MEADOW LAKES ADDITION FROM R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) TO
0-I-PD (OFFICE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)
POSTPONED
10.
ORDINANCE NO. 1589
POSTPONED
11.
PZ 88-22 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING -
REQUEST OF CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS TO REZONE
TRACT 182B, J. CONDRÄ SURVEY, ABSTRACT 310, FROM
AG (AGRICULTURE) TO U (INSTITUTIONAL)
(LOCATED AT 7301 BURSEY ROAD)
Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to
speak in fa~or of this request to please come forward.
Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning and Zoning and representing North
Richland Hills, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Tucker stated this property was where the Senior Citizens Center was
located. Mr. Tucker st~ted the reason for this hearing was to give the
citizens an opportunity to speak.
I·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
January 9, 1989
Page 3
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated this property would be used strictly for a
Senior Citizens Center.
Mr. Tucker stated the Planning and Zoning Commission had approved the
zoning with the stipulation that the property could be used only as a
Senior Citizens Center.
Mrs. Mary Ann Gibson, 8333 Odell, appeared before the Council.
Mrs. Gibson stated the Center was needed. Mrs. Gibson stated a lot of
people came to the Center and it had done a lot of good for the senior
citizens.
Mr. W.F. Wells, 7300 Bursey Road, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Wells stated it was his desire to maintain the property as a Senior
Citizens Center.
Mr. Line advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended
the zoning with the stipulation that the property be used for a Senior
Citizens Center and if the Council approved the Planning and Zoning
recommendation it would be maintained as a Senior Citizens Center.
Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to the
request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Brown closed the Public
Hearing.
12.
ORDINANCE NO. 1590
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve
Ordinance No. 1590.
Motion carried 6-0.
*13.
PS 88-22 REQUEST OF ST. JOHN THE APOSTLE CHURCH
FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK G. CALLOWAY FARMS
ADDITION (LOCATED OÑ THE NORTH SIDE OF GLENVIEW
DRIVE AND WEST OF FRAWLEY DRIVE)
APPROVED
*14.
PS 88-27 REQUEST OF CHARLES T. CLARK FOR SHORT FORM PLAT
OF LOT 7, BLOCK 3, WOODBERT ADDITION (LOCATED ON SOUTH
SIDE OF SAYERS LANE)
APPROVED
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
Ie
I
January 9, 1989
Page 4
*15.
PS 88-28 REQUEST OF RICHMOND BAY DEVELOPMENT, INC.
FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 46, BLOCK 3, MEADOW LAKES
ADDITION (LOCATED ON SOUTH END OF SKYLARK CIRCLE)
APPROVED
*16.
GN 89-01 AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES FOR lOCKBOX ACCOUNTS -
RESOLUTION NO. 89-1
APPROVED
17.
GN 89-02 ADOPTION OF IIIRON HORSE" AS NAME FOR
THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS GOLF COURSE -
RESOLUTION NO. 89-2
APPROVED
Councilman Welch moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, to approve
Resolution No. 89-2.
Motion carried 6-0.
*18.
GN 89-03 TARRANT COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION
1989 SINGLE FAMILY BOND PROGRAM -
RESOLUTION NO. 89-3
APPROVED
*19.
GN 89-04 PROPOSED UTILITY REVENUE BOND REFUNDING
& ISSUANCE OF $2,000,000 IN NEW DEBT
APPROVED
*20.
PU 89-01 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
FROM QUADRANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR THE
PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING SMITHFIELD ROAD (PARCEL #15)
APPROVED
*21.
PU 89-02 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM
QUADRANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR THE PURPOSE
OF CONSTRUCTING SMITHFIELD ROAD (PARCEL #14)
APPROVED
*22.
PU 89-03 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM
JIMMIE W. WEST FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING
SMITHFIELD ROAD (PARCEL #22)
APPROVED
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
January 9, 1989
Page 5
*23.
PU 89-04 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM
CENTURY JOINT VENTURE FOR THE PURPOSE OF
CONSTRUCTING SMITHFIELD ROAD (PARCEL #16)
APPROVED
*24.
PU 89-05 AWARD OF BID ON WATER SUPPLY WELLS
FOR MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE
APPROVED
*25.
PW 89-01 APPROVE COST PARTICIPATION IN SIGNALIZATION
OF RlJFE SNOW DRIVE AT STARDUST DRIVE
APPROVED
*26.
PW 89-02 APPROVE BUDGET FOR MISCELLANEOUS WATER LINE
REPLACEMENTS FOR 1989
APPROVED
*27.
PAY 89-01 APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT TO TARRANT COUNTY
FOR HARMONSON ROAD PAVING IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II
APPROVED
28.
CITIZENS PRESENTATION
Mr. Phil Ricke, 6436 Buckingham Trail, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Ricke stated he would encourage the Council to consider the sidewalk
issue. Mr. Ricke stated his concern was for the safety of the children
walking along Rufe Snow and Little Ranch Road going to Foster Village
School. Mr. Ricke stated that he was aware the Council was working very
hard on the issue and he wanted to encourage the Council to keep it on the
agenda.
Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated a discussion was held in Pre-council concerning
the Foster Village School. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated the CIP Committee
did look at trying to get permission to cross the Graham property and was
unable to get permission. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated the Council had
given the CIP Committee direction to build a permanent sidewalk along Rufe
Snow at an approximate cost of $22,000 and make Little Ranch Road a
one-way street north bound during school hours to help the traffic flow
and safety of those that walk on Little Ranch Road. Mayor Pro Tern Davis
stated it had been recommended to the Council and it would be on the next
agenda for funding.
Councilwoman Spurlock stated there was concern about the traffic on Rufe
Snow, but the sidewalk would be set as far away from the street as
possible.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
January 9, 1989
Page 6
Councilman Welch stated he was against the children having to walk along
Rufe Snow. Councilman Welch stated he had no objections to the sidewalk,
but he was against the children having to walk on the sidewalk close to
Rufe Snow. Councilman Welch stated his colleagues had convinced him the
sidewalk was needed. Councilman Welch asked if the citizens would be
satisfied if the Council authorized the sidewalk on Rufe Snow and made
Little Ranch Road one way.
Mr. Ricke stated the majority of the children that attended Foster Village
would not benefit from a sidewalk on Rufe Snow. Mr. Ricke stated that
there needed to be a sidewalk at that location, but he did not feel the
City should stop at that point. Mr. Ricke stated he felt that Little
Ranch Road or a right-of-way through Mr. Graham's property from Hightower
to Chapman would satisfy the problem. Mr. Ricke stated he realized that
people purchased property on Little Ranch Road expecting to live in a
country setting and did not want kids running through their yards. Mr.
Ricke stated that from a practical standpoint, Rufe Snow was very
dangerous and did not satisfy a direct route for the children from the
southern boundary attending the school. Mr. Ricke stated the only way to
solve the problem was to construct a sidewalk on Little Ranch Road or
obtain the right-of-way through Mr. Graham1s property.
Councilman Welch stated that if any of the concerned citizens could help
the City obtain the right-of-way it would solve a lot of problems.
Mr. Ricke asked if the City could condemn the needed land.
Mr. Line stated that the cost of condemnation would be prohibitive.
Mr. Ricke asked about when the land was developed.
Mr. line stated that when Mr. Graham decided to develop the property,
there would definitely be consideration given to vehicle and pedestrian
access somewhere between Rufe Snow and Little Ranch Road.
Councilman Garvin stated that the parents that bring their children to and
from school were the worse violators of speeding on Little Ranch Road and
that they did not have any regard for the children walking. Councilman
Garvin stated traffic safety would be immensely helped if someone would
get concerned enough to go to the school and make an effort to tell those
parents to slow down.
Mr. Ricke stated he concurred with Councilman Garvin and suggested that
the North Richland Hills Police patrol the street.
29.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to adjourn
the meeting.
Motion carried 6-0.
I" -
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ATTEST:
January 9, 1989
Page 7
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Economic Development
1/23/89
~epartment:
Subject:
Council Meeting Date:
Reauest of Collins Investments for Replat of Agenda Number: PS 87-45
Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, North Hills Village Addition.
This Replat Application is presented for consideration. The subject property is located
at the southwest intersection of Loop 820 and S.H. 26.
All engineering comments have been satisfactorily answered.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Replat Application PS 87-45.
RECOMMENDATION:
Ie The
City Council should act on the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
e~/~
t Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
I
CONT.. 1452,1453, 1456, 1460
7-06-87 1446,144'7, 1450,1451
2 - 21- 85 1087, 1090, 1091, 1092
t093, 1094, 1095, 109t
1097, 1100, 1104, 1105
1106, 1107, 1108, 1109
1110, 1111, 111'7, 1118, 1119
1120, 1121, 1122, 1123
1124, 1125, 1126, 1127
fl28, 1130, 1131, 1132
_._-~
I
¡Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
(
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
JANUARY 12, 1989 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to
Chairman, John Schwinger,
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Secretary
Members
John Schwinger
Mark Wood
David Barfield
Don Bowen
James Brock
David Greene
Pat Marin
George Tucker
Wanda Calvert
Alt. Member
Dir. Planning/Dev.
P & Z Coordinator
ABSENT:
Ron Lueck
N OF THE MINUTES
ER 8, 1989
Mr. Barfield made the motion to
approve the minutes as written. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and
the motion carried 7-0.
1.
PS 87-45
Request of Burk Collins Investments
for replat of Lots 5 & 6, Block 1,
North Hills Village Addition.
PS 87-45
APPROVED
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 87-45. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Barfield and the motion carried
7-0.
2.
PS 88-30
Request of Marvin D. Smith for
plat of Lots 8 & 9, Block 5,
Addition.
PS 88-30
APPROVED
Mr. Wood made
PS 88-30 is motion was seconded by
Ms. 1n and the motion carried 7-0.
3.
PS 88-31
Request of Richmond Bay Development
for replat of Lots 13R thru 16R, Block
10, Meadow Lakes Addition.
Chairman Schwinger opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this replat to
please come forward.
/
i
I
I
lie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
( (
JOHN D. ZIMMERMAN
P.E., R.P.S.
REelSTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR
2300 ROOSEVELT OR. UNIT C
ARLINßTON. TEXAS 78018
(817) 481-0188
December 19, 1988
City of North Richland Hills
7301 NE Loop 820
P. o. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Attn: Kevin B. Miller
Asst. Director of Public Works/Utilities
Subject: PS 87-45, North Hills Village, Lots 5 & 6, Block 1
Replat.
Dear Kevin;
I have made the noted correction on the marked up sheet of
the subject replat.
The 10 foot easement in the approximate center of the plat is
for a gas line to be installed to a future pad site.
The 10 foot easement near the southwest corner, near the
curve on Edison Drive, is for gas service to the buildings.
The 15 foot drainage' and utility easement is contiguous to
the 96 foot drainage has been defined.
Enclosed is your marked up-copy.
P.E., R.P.S.
/
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
City of J\ðrth Richland HiUs, Texas
December 2, 1988
REF: PWM-115-88
ME?.mD to:
Planning & Zoning Conmission
From:
Kevin B. Miller
Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities
SUbject:
PS 87-45; NORTH HILLS VILIAGE - Lots 5 & 6,
Block 1; REPLAT
I have reviewed the above referenced documents and offer the following
carments.
1. The metes and bounds description does not contain adequate closure. The
curve located at the intersection of Edison Drive and the frontage road
appears as a tangent curve. If it is intended to be a nontangent curve then
it should be noted as such and a chord bearing added to the drawing.
2 . The drafting should be corrected as shown on the attached blueline.
3. Overlapping easements of the same type are unnecessary and should be
resolved. There are two existing 10 foot Utili ty Easements along the
southwest property line of lot 5 and a proposed 20 foot Utility Easement to
cover the same area.
{!£~l!P·.
cc: Mr. George Tucker, Planning Manager
(817) 281.Q041"301 N.E. LOOP 8201P.O. BOX 18809/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 78180
I
Ie
I
(
(
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
MARCH 10, 1988 - 7:30 P. M.
I
I
I
I
I
I
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
~
1. PS 87-45
~'---
The meeting was called to order by
Chairman, George Tucker, at 7:30
PRESENT:
Chairman
Secretary
Members
orge Tucker
Carole Flippo
Mark Wood
Don Bowen
David Barfield
Manny Tricoli
C. A. Sanford
Richard Royston
Wanda Calvert
er
conomic Dev.
Planning/Dev.
P & Z Coordinator
ABSENT:
John Schwinger
Ron Lueck
Mr. Tricoli made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. This motion
was seconded by Mr. Barfield and the
motion carried 4-0 with Carole Flippo
and Mark Wood abstaining since they
were not present at the meeting.
Request of Burk Collins Investments
for replat of Lots 5 & 6, Block 1,
North Hills Village Addition.
Jackey Fluitt with Burk Collins
Investments came forward. He said he
would be glad to answer any questions
the Commission might have regarding
this plat.
Mr. Wood stated that the Commission is
concerned with access to the Muffler
Shop.
Mr. Fluitt stated that on February 9th
they wrote the Muffler Shop stating
they would provide access to the
north.
Mr. Wood asked if they had responded
to the letter.
Mr. Fluitt stated they had not.
I
Ie
I
Page 2
P & Z Minutes
March 10, 1988
(
(
I
Mr. Wood said until the problem of
access is settled in court, he would
like to see the abandonment of this
access be taken off the plat.
I
Mr. Fluitt said it had already been in
court once and it was denied.
I
James B. Morgan, Attorney, came
forward to represent the owners of the
Muffler Shop. He said only
preliminary matters have been heard in
court. He said they do not want
access to the rear of the property.
Mr. Morgan requested the Commission
not abandon the easement that has been
used for 20 years.
I
I
I
Mr. Wood asked if the Commission could
accept this plat with the stipulation
that the access easement not be
abandoned.
Ie
I
Mr. Royston said they could approve
the plat with the deletion of the
words "to be abandoned" on the access
easement.
I
Chairman Tucker said to just state it
in the motion.
I
PS 87-45
APPROVED
Mr. Barfield made the motion to
approve PS 87-45 with the stipulation
that the reference to the 50 foot
access easement recorded in Volume
6537, Page 589 "to be abandoned by
this plat" be deleted from the face of
the plat. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood and the motion carried 6-0.
I
I
2.
PZ 88-3
Request of Richmond
rezone a portion of
Trimble Surve ract 1520, from
its classification of R-2
ngle Family to R-8 Single Family
Zero Lot Line. This property is
located south of Meadow Lakes Drive
and west of Dory Court.
I
I
I
I
il
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
( (
JOHN D. ZIMMERMAN
P.E., R.P.S.
REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR
2300 ROOSEVELT DR. UNIT C
ARLINeTON. TEXAS 78018
(817) 481-0188
February 18, 1988
City of North Richland Hills
Planning and Zoning
P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Tx 76180
Attn: Wanda Calvert, P & Z Coordinator
Re: PS 87-45, North Hills Village, Lots 5 & 6, Block 1.
Dear Wanda;
We are submitting 12 new bluelines as per your request of the
above referenced plat.
We have made the minor corrections as was requested in the
letter we received dated 12-23-87. The drainage easement is
now a utility and drainage easement per TU Electric Company
request. Also, in reference to your request for ingress and
egress easement to Lot 2, Block 4, Richland Terrace Addition
in the letter dated 12-23-87. We are attaching copies of the
exhibits for a proposed access easement.
If you need anything further or have any questions, please
call.
Sincerely,
Ct 0 <t) .;~..
~ Zi~rman P.E.,R.P.S.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
( (
City of J(örth Richland Hills, Texas
~::~=-
\!~
: ,I
If
December 23, 1987
REF: PWM~OI07-87
Memo to: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Gregory W. Dickens, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities
Subject: PS 87-45; NORTH HILLS VILLAGE ADDITION;
Final Plat & Plans
We have reviewed the referenced material and offer the following
connnent.
1. A dedicated public ingress & egress easement should be provided
to insure access to Lot 2, Block 4, Richland Terrace Addition
from State Highway 26.
...¿~~~0¡(JJ&U~
Gregov Uê1íS, P.E. ~
Ids
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118
I
~..1 ~
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Department:
I _Ubject:
Economic Development
1/23/89
Council Meeting Date:
Request of Marvin D. Smith for Final Plat
PS 88-30
Agenda Number:
of Lots 8 and 9, Block 5, Maroaks Addition
I
I
I
This Final· Plat Application is presented for consideration. The subject property is
located on Lincoln Drive.
All Engineering comments have been satisfactorily answered.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Plat Application PS 88-30.
I
I
I4IÞRECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should act upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
I_ Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
I
If f!/~
ent Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
1
Page 1 of
I
R-2
R-S- 1500
'453
C-2
'32'
Ie
I
I
R-I
'322
AG
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
JANUARY 12, 1989 - 7:30 P. M.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to
Chairman, John Schwinget,
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Secretary
Members
chwinger
M Wood
avid Barfield
Don Bowen
James Brock
David Greene
Pat Marin
George Tucker
Wanda Calvert
Ron Lueck
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF DECEMBER 8, 1989
Mr. Barfield made the motion to
approve the minutes as written. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and
the motion carried 7-0.
1.
Request of Burk Collins Investments
for replat of Lots 5 & 6, Block 1,
North Hills Village Addition.
PS 87-45
APPROVED
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 87-45. This motion was seconded by·
Mr. Barfield and the motion carried
7-0.
2.
PS 88-30
Request of Marvin D. Smith for final
plat of Lots 8 & 9, Block 5, Maroaks
Addition.
PS 88-30
APPROVED
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 88-30. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Marin and the motion carried 7-0.
3.
PS 88-31
Request of Richmond Bay Developmen
for replat of Lots 13R th , Block
10, Meadow Lakes
an Schwinger opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this replat to
please come forward.
· ')
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
~
( ("
JOHN D. ZIMMERMAN
P.E., R.P.S.
REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR
2300 ROOSEVELT DR. UNIT C
ARLINC3TON, TEXAS 78018
(817) 481-0188
December 12, 1988
City of North Richland Hills
P. O. Box 18609
7301 NE Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Attn: Kevin B. Miller P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities
Subject: PS 88-30: MAROAKS ADDITION, Lots 8 & 9, Block 5
Final Plat and Construction Plans Comment Response.
Dear Kevin;
The following response addresses your comment memo to the
Planning and Zoning Commission dated 1 December, 1988:
Plat
~oted lot corners monumentation ie Set or found iron
rods.
s. Added note to the plat per new County requirements as
stated in letter from Wanda Calvert.
Water and Sewer Plan and Profile
2. Added Signature Block.
3. Lengthened minimum bore to 35 feet in plan view to agree
with profile.
4. Added pavement type (Asphalt) and located B/C to property
corner.
·If you have any questions please call.
CJ
rman
P.E. ,R.P.S.
-
II
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
Ie
I
. .
(
(
City of JXõrth Richland HiUs, Texas
December 1, 1988
REF: PWM-112-88
Memo to:
Planning & Zoning Comnission
From:
Kevin B. Miller
Assistant Director of Public WOrks/Utilities
Subject:
PS 88-30; MAROAKS ADDITION, Lots 8 & 9,
Block 5, Final Plat and Construction Plans
I have reviewed the alx>ve subject dcx=urnents and offer the following carments.
PIAT
1. The lot corners are not identified as iron rods. This should be noted
by legend or notes. All corners should be identified as found or set iron
rods.
WATER AND SEWER PIAN AND PROFILE
2 . The attached signature block should be added to this sheet.
3 . The bores should be lengthened to provide a minimum of 2 feet of
clearance fran the back of curb on Lincoln Drive. If the bore was stopped
at the back of curb, the street subgrade could suffer fran under mining.
4 . The pavement type, width and location wi thin the right-of-way should be
noted.
The carments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design
engineer fran his responsibility to provide adequate, accurate, buildable
construction plans, nor does approval of the construction plans signify
acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for the
engineering contained in the bid documents.
~ð.~~
Kevin B. Miller, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public WOrks/Utilities
KBM/ds
(817) 281.Q041"301 N.E. LOOP 8201P.O. BOX 18809/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 78180
II
I Economic Development
~epartment:
~ Request of Richmond Bay for Replat of
I Subject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
I - Other
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
1/23/89
Council Meeting Date:
PS 88-31
Agenda Number:
Lots 13R through 16R, Block 10, Meadow Lakes Addition
This Replat Application is presented for consideration.
on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive.
The subject property is located
All Engine~ring comments have been satisfactorily answered.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Plat Application PS 88-31.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should act upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning
eCOImIliSsion.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
(¿~b
, -!...
Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
t Finance Director
1
Page 1 of
I
I e
I
I
I !I!J¡¡...
I
I
I
I
I e
I
I
I
I
I
I .
0
40ft
I' III
<II
0
~
I I
f(f(
~Þ'
R-7-MF
C-2
1450
C-2
1164
-
s. U.
....- ..---~-- -
Ie
I
I
I
I (,
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE--
PLANNING AND ZONING-€OMMISSrOM·OF THE
CITY ·ÖP--NÕ·RTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
JANUARY 12, 1989 - 7:30 P. M.
-...._.~ .....- ..~ ....
Alt. Member
Dir. Planning/
P & Z Coordi tor
John
Mark
. Dav· Barfield
Bowen
James Broc~
David Greene
Pat Marin-
George Tucker
Wanda Calvert
CALL TO ORDER
.rhe meeting was called to
Chairman, John Schwinger,
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Secretary
Members
. "-- _.... - -
-- -
Ron Lueck
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES
OF DECEMBER 8, 1989
Mr. arfield made the motion to
rove the minutes as written. This
motion was seco~ded by-Mr~ Bowen-and-
the motion carried 7-0.
1.
PS 87-45
Request of Burk Collins Investments
for replat of Lots 5 & 6, Block 1,
North Hills Village Addition.
PS 87-45
APPROVED
Mr. Bowen mad~_the motion to approve
PS 87-45. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Barfield and the motion carried
7-0.
._- .~- - -... --~---
2.
Request of Marvin D. Smith for final
plat of Lots 8 & 9, Block 5, Maroaks
Addition.
PS 88-30
APPROVED
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 88-30. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Marin and the motion carried 7-0.
3.
PS 88-31
Request of Richmond Bay Development
for replat of Lots 13R thru 16R, Block
10, Meadow Lakes Addition.
I
I
Ie
I
Chairman Schwinger opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this replat to
please come forward.
I
Page 2
P & Z Minutes
January 12, 1989
(
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
PS 88-31
APPROVED
I
4.
PS 88-33
I
Ie
PS 88-33
APPROVED
I
5.
PS 88-34
I
I
'I
I
PS 88-34
APPROVED
6.
I
I
I
I
(
Bob Frank came forward to represent
Richmond Bay Development. He said he
was here to request approval of the
replat. .
Chairman Schwinger called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
replat to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Brock made the motion to approve
PS 88-31. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0.
Request of William & Alisa Nelms
preliminary plat of Lot 1, Block
Nelms Addition.
Mr. Wood made the rove
PS 88-33 with the stipula · n that
they sign a covenant fa the water,
sewer, and street. s motion was
seconded by Mr. B ield and the
motion carried O.
Nelms for
1, Nelms
r. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 88-34 with the stipulation that
they sign a covenant for the water,
sewer, and street. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Barfield and the
motion carried 7-0.
Request of Richmond Bay Development
for final plat of Meadow Lakes
Addition, Phase III.
Mr. Bowen stated the staff had
recommended that a temporary cuI de
sac be constructed at the end of
Skylark Circle until Phase IV is put
in.
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_
I 16800 Dallas Parkway
Suite 1 50
Dallas, Texas 75248
214 / 248-0126
I
(
(
WORRELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
engineers · planners
January 3, 1989
""r . Kevin B. Miller
Asst. Director Public
\Vorks" Util ¡ties
CITY OF N. RICH LAND HILLS
7301 N.E. Loop 820
N. Richland Hills~ Tx 76180
RE: PS 8831 - Replat of Meadow Lakes Lots 13R-16R
Block 10 and Construction Plans
Our File: 88052
Dear Mr. ^1ille"r:
We have reviewed your comments in a memo to the Planning and
Zoning Commission dated December 19, 1988, and have the following
comments:
1. Bearings and Distances have been placed all along the
easement; the water" line has been revised so that Lot
12 is no longer affected. The note "Utility Easement is
Relocated as Shown II has been added.
2. A re!Jroducible cover sheet is included with th is
submittal.
Thank you for your coo:Jeration and the comments made on this
project. If you· have any further questions please feel free to
contact me at this office.
Sincerely ~
WORRELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
JFH :jf
cc: Bob Frank
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
( (
City of J(órth Richland Hills, Texas
I
~
December 19, 1988
REF: PWM-012 1-88
Memo to: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Kevin B. Miller, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities
Subject: PS 88-31; Replat of MEADrn~ LAKES, Lots l3R-16R,
Block 10 and Construction Plans
I have reviewed the subject documents resubmitted December 16, 1988
and offer the following comments.
1. The utility easement appears to adequately cover the water line but
lacks sufficient data to accurately establish the easement on the
ground. The easement as currently depicted will require rep1atting
Lot 12 as well as Lots 13R-16R. If this is undesirable, the easement
and proposed water line should be revised to limit the necessary
revisions to Lots l3R-16R. Since a utility easement currently exists
and is being revised, the plat should depict both the existing and
proposed easements. The existing easement should be noted as
"UTILITY EASEMENT IS RELOCATED AS SHOWN".
2. Include a reproducible cover sheet with the next submittal.
The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design
engineer from his responsibility to provide adequate, accurate,
buildable construction plans, nor does approval of the construction plans
signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills
for the engineering contained in the bid documents.
~<~~~._~
~Z:/7 ~. ~/'¿{--CC:-<-
Kevin B. Miller, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities
KBM/ds
cc: Mr. George Tucker, Planning Manager
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118
I
I .
_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
_
I 16800 Dallas Parkway
Suite 150
Dallas, Texas 75248
214 / 248-0126
I
(
(
WORRELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
engineers · planners
December 16, 1988
Mr. C. A. Sanford
Director of Economic Development
CITY OF N. RICH LAND HILLS
7301. N. E. Loop 820
N. Richland Hills', Tx 76180
RE: PS88-31 Replat of Meadowlakes Block 10
Lots 13R- 16R and Construction Plans
Our File: 88052
Dear Mr. Sanford:
We have reviewed your engineering comments and are responding
as follows:
1. Completed
2. I ron Rods were removed at time of restaking to avoid
conflict or misinterpretation of correct points
3. Completed'
4. Completed
5. Completed
6. Relocated
7. Detail Provided
8. Completed
9. Completed
10. Completed
11. Corrected
Should· you have any further· comments regarding this project
please do not hesitate to contact us at this office.
Sincerely,
WORRELL & ASSOC IA TES, INC.
John R. Hutchens
JRH :jf
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
City of J(8rth Richland Hills, Texas
December 13, 1988
REF: PWM-119-88
Memo to:
Planning & Zoning Conmission
From:
Kevin B. Miller
Assistant Director of Public WOrks/Utilities
Subject:
PS 88-31; Replat of MEADOW ~~, Block 10,
lDts 13R-16R and Construction Plans
I have revie~ the above subject documents and offer the following carments.
COVER SHEET
1. The title should be corrected to indicate lot 13R rather than lDt 3R.
REPLAT
2. There was no reference made to the existing west lot line of IDt 16.
Were these pins removed or simply not found?
3. A future 50 foot right-of-way is sha-m adjacent to Lot 16R. The drawing
should be changed to depict this right-of-way 'vi th phantcm lines so that it
is obvious that no right-of-way dedication is contained in this plat.
4. lDt 17 was never platted, therefore no reference should be made of a
nonexistent lot.
WATER AND SEWER PLAN
5 · Fire hydrants which are located on the oPIX'si te side of a collector
street are not counted towards the minimum required fire protection.
Hydrant coverage radii originating from the north side of Meadow Lakes Drive
should be rezroved as shown.
(817) 281'()041"301 N.E. LOOP 8201P.O. BOX 18809/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 78180
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~-0119-88
Page 2
December 13, 1988
(
("
6 . The water line in the inmediate vicini ty of the existing sani tary sewer
should be provided with adequate easement space such that a 10 foot
clearance can be ma.intained between the existing sani tary sewer and the new
water line.
7 . The existing 4 and 6 inch water lines should be connected as· shown on
the attached drawing. This will minimize the inconvenience to the existing
residents.
8 . The future 50 foot right-of-way should be drawn wi th phantan lines.
Dm'AIL SHERI' ( 3 of 4)
9 . All inappropriate details should be removed.
Dm'AIL SHEET (4 of 4)
10. Inappropriate details should be retroved.
11. The trench embedment detail for water should be revised to indicate
cushion sand rather than pea gravel.
The comœnts contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design
engineer from his responsibili ty to provide adequate, accurate, buildable
construction plans, nor does approval of the construction plans signify
acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for the
engineering contained in the bid docmnents.
~~~~~
Xevin B. Miller, P .E. r
cc: Mr. George Tucker, Planning Manager
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I ~epartment:
I Subject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
Economic Development
1/23/89
Council Meeting Date:
Request of William and Alisa Nelms for Final Plat
PS 88-34
Agenda Number:
of Lot 1, Block 1, Nelms Addition.
This Final Plat Application is presented for consideration.
located on the east side of Crane Road.
The subject property is
The applicants have requested that they be allowed to sign a covenant for street, water
and sewer improvements in lieu of construction improvements at this time.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Plat Application PS 88-34
with the stipulation that applicants sign a covenant for street, water and sewer
improvements.
I e RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should act on the P.lanning and Zoning Commission recommendation.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budg t
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~
ent Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
/Î
£?£~
I City anager
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
/1
I "
I ·
\'
"
\ "
\ "
, \
\ \
, .......t:" ð
, \ ....r;
~~~ ~'
I-I
SU
.,.
AG
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
age
P & Z Minutes
January 12, 1989
PS 88-31
APPROVED
4.
PS 88-33
5.
PS 88-34
PS 88-34
APPROVED
6.
PS 88-35
Bob Frank came forward to represent
Richmond Bay Development. He said
was here to request approval of
replat. .
Chairman Schwinger call for those
wishing to speak in osition to this
replat to please e forward.
o one wishing to speak,
closed the Public
r. Brock made the motion to approve
PS 88-31. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0.
Request of William & Alisa Nelms for
preliminary plat of Lot 1, Block 1,
Nelms Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 88-33 with the stipulation that
they sign a covenant for the water,
sewer, and street. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Barfield and the
motion carried 7-0.
Request of William & Alisa Nelms for
final plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Nelms
Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 88-34 with the stipulation that
they sign a covenant for the water,
sewer, and street. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Barfield and the
motion carried 7-0.
Request of Richmond Bay Developm
for final plat of Meadow
Addition, Phase
en stated the staff had
recommended that a temporary cuI de
sac be constructed at the end of
Skylark Circle until Phase IV is put
in.
I
I .
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
owL D. Long and Associat~, Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
December 22, 1988
Mrs. Wanda Calvert
Planning and Zoning Coordinator
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: PS 88-33 and PS 88-34
Nelms Addition, Lot 1, Block 1
Preliminary and Final Plats
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
We have a copy of the Assistant Director of Public Works· comment letter
dated December 19,1988 for the above referenced project and have the following
comments:
Preliminary and Final Plat
1. The roadway width and type of pavement has been shown on the
drainage layout sheet.
2. Five foot dedication of right-of-way for Crane Road has been
shown on the Preliminary and Final Plats, which makes 30 feet
from the center line on their side of Crane.
3. The existing tract number and survey were shown on the plats
but now ha~been designated on the Preliminary and Final in a
different manner to show that this lot was a part of Tract 3-0.
Water Layout
4. Mr. and Mrs. Nelms request that a waiver be granted to allow
them to use the existing 4-inch water line and they will be
willing to sign a covenant for the future water improvements.
Sewer Layout
5. Mr. and Mrs. Nelms request that a waiver be granted to allow
them to use septic tanks for the present time. They are willing
to sign a covenant for the future sewer improvements.
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / Hurst, Texas 76053 / Phone (817) 281-8121
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Mrs. Wanda Ca 1 vert (
-2-
6. Waiver requested.
f
December 22, 1988
Street Improvements
7. Mr. and Mrs. Nelms are willing to sign a covenant for the
future street improvements.
If there are further questions or comments, please give me a call.
{:¿cerelY,[).
~ong, P. E.
Consulting Engineer
ODL/ml
cc: Mr. and Mrs. W. Nelms
3041 River Ridge Blvd.
Grand Prairie, Tex. 75050
IJ.E
) r· ·
I"
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
( (
City of j\{9rth Richland Hil1s~ Texas
December 19, 1988
REF: P~lli-0120-88
Memo to: Planning & Zoning Commission
From:
Kevin B. Miller, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities
RE:
PS 88-33 & PS 88-34: NELMS ADDITION, Lot 1, Block 1,
Preliminary and Final Plats
I have reviewed the above referenced documents and offer the following
comments.
PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT
1. The drawing should include the width of the roadway and type of
pavement.
2. This portion of Crane Road is designated as a C2U which requires an
ultimate right-of-way of 60 feet. Sufficient right-of-way should be
dedicated to provide one-half (30 feet) of the ultimate required right-
of-way.
3. The existing tract number and survey should be shown on the plan
with phantom lines.
WATER LAYOUT
4. The current water distribution master plan indicates the existing
4 inch water main should be replaced with a 12 inch pipe. As the
developer of a residential lot, this owner would be responsible for
replacing the existing 4 inch pipe with a 6. inch.. City participation would
be available for the remaining cost· incurred to upgrade to a 12 inch
pipe. Construction plans for this design should be submitted to the
Public Works Department.
SEWER LAYOUT
5. The existing 6 inch sanitary sewer should be extended north along
Crane Road to the northwest corner of this lot. Plans for this construction
should be submitted to the Public Works Department for review.
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118
1-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
NELMS ADDITION
Page 2
December 19, 1988
{
(
6. If a waiver is granted to comments four and five above, we
recommend the owner sign a covenant. The covenant would then be filed
as a lien on the property. The covenant would commit this owner (or
future owners as applicable) to participate in the future construction
cost of these improvements.
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
7. Crane Road is not in immediate need of reconstruction in this area,
however future widening is indicated by the ~~ster Thoroughfare Plan.
A similar covenant should be signed and filed commiting this owner or
future owners to participate in the cost of future street and drainage
improvements.
~
~. ~Y" ~ .,~/
~~:;7~
~ - ./- . ?
c/ ,/"";Ÿ"~ ~~~ ~:. __ '
evin ~I. ~Iiller', P. E.
Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities
KBM/ds
cc: Mr. George Tucker, Planning Manager
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Economic Development
1/23/89
Department:
ttubject:
Council Meeting Date:
Request of Richmond Bay for Final Plat of Lots
PS 88-35
Agenda Number:
20 through 24, Block 10, and Lot 1, Block 11, Meadow Lakes
Addition (Phase III)
This Plat Application is presented for consideration. The subject property is
located on the proposed extension of Skylark Circle.
All Engineering comments have been satisfactorily answered.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Plat Application PS 88-35
with stipulation that a temporary cul-de-sac be constructed unless bids and construction
schedule are provided for the completion of Skylark Circle to the Public Works
Department prior to laying asphalt on Phase III.
e
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should act on the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
~
r
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
I _ Operating Budget
I_ Other
I
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~~~
t Head Signature í City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
C-2
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
R-7- MF
C-2
~----
-
II:
o
VI
'"
..
o
s.u.
Ie
I
age
P & Z Minutes
January 12, 1989
I
I
I
I
PS 88-31
APPROVED
I
4. PS 88-33
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
PS 88-33
APPROVED
5.
6. PS 88-35
Bob Frank came forward to represent
Richmond Bay Development. He said he
was here to request approval of the
replat. ~
Chairman Schwinger called for
wishing to speak in opposi on
replat to please come fo ard.
There being no one ~ hing to speak,
the Chairman clos the Public
Hearing.
e the motion to approve
This motion was seconded by
and the motion carried 7-0.
R est of William & Alisa Nelms for
reliminary plat of Lot 1, Block 1,
Nelms Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 88-33 with the stipulation that
they sign a covenant for the water,
sewer, and street. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Barfield and the
motion carried 7-0.
Request of William & Alisa Nelms for
final plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Nelms
Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 88-34 with the stipulation that
they sign a covenant for the water,
sewer, and street. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Barfield and the
motion carried 7-0.
Request of Richmond Bay Development
for final plat of Meadow Lakes
Addition, Phase III.
Mr. Bowen stated the staff had
recommended that a temporary cuI de
sac be constructed at the end of
Skylark Circle until Phase IV is put
in.
I
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
January 12, 1989
(
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
PS 88-35
APPROVED
I
Ie
I
I
7.
PS 88-36
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
Mr. Tucker said the staff is
requesting that a temporary cuI de sac
be constructed at the e~d of Skylark
Circle unless bids and construction
schedule are provided prior to the
laying of asphalt. He asked Mr. Frank
if he felt he could provide this for
Phases IV and V.
Bob Frank came forward. He said the
construction would depend on sales.
Mr. Frank stated the contract states
we must do Phase 5 by December, 1989.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 88-35 with the stipulation that a
temporary cuI de sac be constructed at
the end of Skylark Circle unless bids
and construction schedule are provided
to the Public Works Department prior
to laying of Asphalt on Phase III.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen
and the motion carried 7-0.
Request of Richmond Bay Development
for final plat of Meadow Lakes
Addition, Phase IV.
Mr. Tucker stated the staff
approval with the stipula on that
Phases IV and V be co ructed at the
same time and that building permits
will be issued il both Phase IV and
Phase V are plete since Skylark
Circle w a exceed the limitation of
lengt f a street ending with a cuI
de c as stated in the Subdivision
rdinance.
Mr. Frank asked if he could do Phases
IV and V and then Phase III.
Mr. Tucker said he could if Skylark
Circle construction was phased in such
a way as not to conflict with the
Subdivision Ordinance.
Mr. Bowen said in the Pre-Commission
meeting the Commission discussed the
need for a fence at the end of Fairway
Court.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
I 16800 Dallas Parkway
Suite 1 50
Dallas, Texas 75248
214 / 248-0126
I
(
(
WORRELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
engineers · planners
January 3, 1989
Mr. Kevin B . Miller
Asst. Director Public
Works! Util ities
City of N. Richland Hills"
7301 N. E. Loop 820
N. Richland Hills'; Texas 76180
RE: PS 88-35 Meadow Lakes Phase III
Final Plat and Construction Plans
Our File: 88063
Dear Mr. J\1i1ler:
We have reviewed your comments in a memo to the Planning and
Zoning. Commission dated December 29, 1988 and have the following
comments:
Attached please find construction schedule provided by Richmond
Bay Development showing the time frame with projected beginning
and ending dates for each of these three' phases.
Final Plat
1. The final plat and construction plans for Phase III were
submitted as a separate document at the owners request.
Their belief that if a problem arose during the review
process that could not be immediately resolved on Phases IV
and V, that at least Phase 'III 'could be started in a timely
manner. The own-er could' see' no difference in submitting
one final plat and three construction plans as opposted to
submitting 3 plats and 3 construction plans except for the
above mentioned reason.
2. The 12-foot access easement that you requested be
submitted as a separate document running adjacent to the
East lot line of Lot 1, Block 11, is no longer required.
Please see the golf course architect's revised layout.
3. The errors on the' meets and bounds description has been
corrected and please note that Lot 1, Block 11 has been
extended to the limits of the lake. The temporary access
easement for the 'cul-de-sac will be submitted; however,
Phase IV has already been bid and this easement is being
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
;/'
Page 2
1-3-89 (
File: 88063
(
provided you as a courtesy in the event that Richmond Bay
does not develop Phase IV.
Paving Plan
5. The General Notes, specifically' Item 6, supplied to us by
the City of North Richland Hills has been corrected to allow
only' PVC water pipe. It would' be greatly appreciated if the
City would' provide us YJith an updated copy of the General
Notes so that this discrepancy will 'not be a comment on
future drawings.
6. The statement that all 'of the rough cut for Phase IV and V
should be accomplished during Phase III needs to be
discussed. We feel that the rough cut of the street as
shown on the grading plan between Stations 12+00 to Station
21+00 is adequate to provide 'drainage for Skylark Circle~
The additional rough cut in Phase IV which would have to
include Fairway Court cannot be accomplished at this time
since the end of Fairway Court is below grade and a
drainage channel too, the existing floodway would also have
to be cut. Rough cut for Phase V also presents a similar
problem. These items were not included in the original bid
on Phase III' and are outside the 'scope of services for this
phase.
7. We are providing the document as a separate access
easement to be held by the City in' the event that Richmond
Bay does not develop Phase IV. In the event that this does
occu r, at that time, a permanent cul-de-sac can be
designed and built to City specifications. \Ve are providing,
as previously' stated, a schedule for all . phases of
construction and feel that it IS not necessary at this time to
construct temporary cul-de-sacs at the end of each phase.
Your markup on the construction plans stating that the
cul-de-sac can be eliminated by the inspector if Phase IV is
being bid prior to the completion of Phase III. Phase IV
and Phase V were bid in' conjunction with Phase III. We ask
that the decision not to buifd the cul-de-sac be made at
this time and not during the construction of Phase III.
8.' Done
\Yater & Sewer Plans
9. Done
10. Done
11. Trench Safety plans and details' will be included in this set
for City a~proval prior to start of construction.
12. Done
Outside Sanitary Sewer Plan
13. The stubout at Station 3+80 serves a purpose; being that
r
Page 3
1-3-89 (
File: 88063
c
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
the City of North Richland Hills does not allow cleanouts at
the end of a line connecting to the existing manhole is the
most economical aproach to the problem created in Phase IV.
To service Phase IV in Fairway Court an additional manhole
would need to be placed within 40-feet of this existing
. manhole. By connecting that line to the existing manhole
the cost of the pipe to run that additional 40-feet is
approximately 1/2 the cost of constructing an additional
manhole. 'lIe feel that a temporary plug could be provided
inside the manhole to the 6-inch line to prevent sewage
from entering that line until such time that the remaining
line is constructed.
14. Done
Details
15. Done
16. Done
If you have any further comments on this project we would be more
than ha~py to meet with you and your immediate supervisor at your
earliest convenience in an attempt to speed up the review
process.
Sincerely ~
WORRELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
JFH : jf
cc: Bob Frank
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
City of j\{8rth Richland HiUs, Texas
December 29, 1988
REF:
Memo to:
Planning & Zoning Commission
From:
Kevin B. Miller
Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities
Subject:
PS 88-35; MEADOW LAKES, PHASE III
Final Plat and Construction Plans
I have reviewed the above referenced documents and offer the following
comments.
FINAL PLAT
1. Phase 3, 4 and 5 were all submitted simultaneously. It appears
that construction of each phase is to proceed in sequence and
relatively quickly. All three phases could have been submitted as one
plat with only the construction taking place in phases. This was
brought to the Architect's attention prior to review. Since the
Architect elected not to revise his submittal, each plat has been
reviewed on its' own merit.
2. A twelve foot access easement should be submitted on a separate
document. The easement should be located adjacent to and parallel
with the east lot line of Block 11, Lot 1.
3. There are several errors in the metes and bounds description
which should be corrected (see attached drawings).
4. An access easement for a temporary cul-de-sac should be submitted
on a separate document. If Phase IV is advertised for bids prior to
laying asphalt on Phase III, the document will not be filed.
(817) 281.0041"301 N.E. LOOP 8201P.O. BOX 18809/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 78180
I'
I
Ie .
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Meadow Lakes Phase~lI
Page 2
December 29, 1988
(
PAVING PLAN
5. The general notes on all sheets should be corrected as shown to
only allow PVC water pipe.
6. All of the rough cut for Phases IV & V should be accomplished
during Phase III.
7. A 40 foot diameter temporary cul-de-sac should be designed and
incorporated into these plans. If for some reason there is a delay in
starting Phase IV, this cul-de-sac will assist the fire department as
a "turnaround" for fire trucks.
8. Additional corrections should be made as shown on the plans.
WATER AND SEWER PLAN
9. Proposed manhole rim elevations should be shown on the profile.
10. An offsite utility easement should be submitted for the proposed
offsite sanitary sewer pipe.
11. Adequate provisions should be made for trench safety and the
details should be included in these plans.
12. All other corrections should be made as shown on the attached
plans.
OFFSITE SEWER PLAN
13. The stub out at station 3+80 does not appear to serve any
purpose. If the manhole should fill above the flowline of this pipe
prior to the construction of Phase IV, sewage would be trapped at the
downstream end, adjacent to the plug.
14. All other corrections should be made as shown on the plans.
DETAILS
15. The trench embedment detail for the water line should indicate
cushion sand rather than pea gravel.
16. Only those details which are applicable to this project should be
included on the plans.
I ""'"
.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
Ie
I
Meadow Lakes Phase~II
Page 3
December 29, 1988
(
The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design
engineer from his responsibility to provide adequate, accurate,
buildable construction plans, nor does approval of the construction
plans signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North
Richland Hills for the engineering contained in the bid documents.
~7
. /
. , ',,-
~f~~ ~;::øiÍ~~
Kevin B. Miller~PE
cc: Mr. George Tucker, Planning Manager
I
I Department:
I -SUbject:
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Economic Development 1/23/89
Request of Richmond Bay for Final Plat of Lots 25 PS 88-36
Agenda Number:
through 35, Block 10 and Lots 2 through 17, Block 11, Meadow
Lakes Addition (Phase IV).
Council Meeting Date:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This Plat ~pplication is presented for consideration.
on the proposed extension of Skylark Circle.
The subject property is located
All Engineering comments have been satisfactorily answered.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Plat Application PS 88-36
with the following stipulations:
1.
Phase IV and V be constructed at the same time.
2.
A six foot wrought iron fence with brick columns be constructed at the end of
Fairway court.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should act on the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
. Operating Budget
Other J
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~
¡é?1I -~
t Head Signature City anager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Œ
o
<II
"
..
o
C-2
;.. ..
s.u.
ag
P & Z Minutes
I January 12, 1989
Ie
I
I
I
I PS 88-35
I APPROVED
I
Ie 7. PS 88-36
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Mr. Tucker said the staff is
requesting that a temporary cuI
be constructed at the end of Sk
Circle unless bids and const tion
schedule are provided pre to the
laying of asphalt. asked Mr. Frank
if he felt he co provide this for
Phases IV
F came forward. He said the
truction would depend on sales.
Frank stated the contract states
we must do Phase 5 by December, 1989.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 88-35 with the stipulation that a
temporary cuI de sac be constructed at
the end of Skylark Circle unless bids
and construction schedule are provided
to the Public Works Department prior
to laying of Asphalt on Phase III.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen
and the motion carried 7-0.
Request of Richmond Bay Development
for final plat of Meadow Lakes
Addition, Phase IV.
Mr. Tucker stated the staff recommends
approval with the stipulation that
Phases IV and V be constructed at the
same time and that no building permits
will be issued until both Phase IV and
Phase V are complete since Skylark
Circle would exceed the limitation of
length of a street ending with a cuI
de sac as stated in the Subdivision
Ordinance.
Mr. Frank asked if he could do Phases
IV and V and then Phase III.
Mr. Tucker said he could if Skylark
Circle construction was phased in such
a way as not to conflict with the
Subdivision Ordinance.
Mr. Bowen said in the Pre-Commission
meeting the Commission discussed the
need for a fence at the end of Fairway
Court.
I
Page 4
P & Z Minutes
January 12, 1989
(
(
I
Ie
PS 88-36
APPROVED
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 88-36 with the stipulation that
Phases IV and V be constructed at the
same time and that the installing of a
fence be worked out at Fairway Court.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood.
I
I
I
Mr. Barfield said he felt they need to
clarify the fence; should it be
wrought iron.
I
Mr. Frank stated they have a
stipulation regarding fencing.
I
I
Mr. Barfield stated this one would
need to be 6 feet.
Mr. Wood asked when should this fence
be installed.
Ie
I
Mr. Barfield said he felt it should be
before final approval of the
subdivision.
I
Mr. Bowen amended his motion to
include a 6 foot wrought iron fence
with brick columns prior to final
approval of the subdivision. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and
the motion carried 7-0.
8.
PS 88-37
Request of Richmond Bay Development
for final plat of Meadow Lakes
Addition, Phase V.
I
I
Mr. Barfield stated lat should
be approved with same stipulations
as PS 88-36· y should be
constru together.
I
I
I
I
I
r. Wood said it also should be
subject to the Engineer's comments.
Mr. Barfield made the motion to
approve PS 88-37 as staff recommended
and subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0.
I
I
Ie.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
e
I 16800 Dallas Parkway
Suite 1 50
Dallas, Texas 75248
214 / 248-0126
I
(
(
WORRELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
engineers · planners
January L&, 1989
Mr. Kevin B. Mille'r
Asst. Director Public
Works/Utilities
CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills'~ Texas 76180
RE: PS88-36 Meadow Lakes Phase IV
Final Plat and Construction Plans
Our File: 8806'3
Dear Mr. Miller:
We have reviewed your comments in a memo to the Planning & Zoning
Commission dated December 29, 1988 and have the following comments:
Attached please find construction schedule provided by Richmond
Bay Development showing the time frame with projected beginning
and ending dates for each of these 3 phases.
Final Plat
1. The final plat and construction plans for Phase IV were
submitted as separate documents at the owner's
request. Their belief that if a problem arose during the
review process that could not be immediately resolved
on Phase V that at least Phase IV could' be started in a
timely' manner'. The owner could see no difference in
submitting one final plat and three construction plans
as opposed -to submitting three plats and three
construction plans' except for the above mentioned
reason.
2. The above mentioned construction schedule was
providèd you in an attempt to sho\y that by the time
Phase IV is completed Phase V will . begin in a timely
manner and connect Skylark' Circle' back to Meadow
Lakes Drive.
3. Done
4. Temporary access easement will . be provided you as a
courtesy in' the' event that Richmond Bay does not
develop Phase V.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
Ie
I
Page 2
1-LJ-89 r
File: 8806~
(
The' entrance to the golf course is approximately 600
feet from the end of Phase IV. In the event Richmond
Bay does not develop Phase V it would seem appropriate
to connect Skylark' Circle' back to Meadow Lakes Drive
rather than leaving a cul-de-sac with an approximate
street length of 1, 900 feet.
Paving Plans
5. As stated in the case of PS88-35 on Meadow Lakes
Phase III, Item 7, we aske'd that the decision not to
build the cul-de-sac be made at this time and not
during the construction of Phase III.
6. We request that the 40 foot diameter temporary
cul-de-sac be eliminated form these plans. If, for some
reason at the completion of construction on Phase IV, a
fire truck does proceed down Skylark Circle' and
require turnaround space two options are available; to
back into Fairway Court and then proceed to back out
on Skylark Circle' and/or proceed down Fairway Court
to the existing cul-de-sac to make its turnaround. The
dead-end portion of Skylark Circle can be marked
clearly in advance on a temporary basis and should
pose no problem to the Fire Department.
7 . Done
\Vater and Sewer Plan
8. Done
9. Done
10. Trench safety plans and details' will be included in this
set for City approval prior to startup construction.
11. Done
12. See Sheet 6 of 8 for Channel A details.
13. Done
Grading and Drainage Plans
14. Done
15. Done
Details'
16. Done
17. Done
I
I
Ie.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 3
1-4-89 (
File: 88063
c
If you have any further comments on this project we would' be more
than happy to meet with you and your immediate supervisor at your
earlie'st convenience in an attempt to speed up the review process.
Sincerely,
WORRELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
~
F. Hutchens
JFH :jf
cc: Bob Frank
, ~'
I «.
I
Ie.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
!I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
City of JXórth Richland HiUs, Texas
December 29, 1988
REF:
Memo to:
Planning & Zoning Commission
From:
Kevin B. Miller
Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities
Subject:
PS 88-36 MEADOW LAKES, PHASE IV
Final Plat and Construction Plans.
I have reviewed the above referenced documents and offer the following
comments.
FINAL PLAT
1. Phase 3, 4 and 5 were all submitted simultaneously. It appears
that construction of each phase is to proceed in sequence and
relatively quickly. All three phases could have been submitted as one
plat with only the construction taking place in phases. This was
brought to the Architect's attention prior to review. Since the
Architect elected not to revise his submittal, each plat has been
reviewed on its' own merit.
2. The extension of Skylark Circle through Phase IV will result in a
dead end street approximately 1900 feet in length. This is well
beyond the 1000 foot limit set by current policy.
3. The 15 foot "Storm Sewer" eas'ement between Block 10, Lots 32 and
33 and Block 11, Lots 9 and 10, should be retitled to "Drainage"
easement.
4. An access easement for a temporary cul-de-sac should be submitted
on a separate document. If Phase V is advertised for bids prior to
laying asphalt on Phase IV, the document will not be filed.
(817) 281'()041"301 N.E. lOOP 820IP.O. BOX 18809/NORTH RICHLAND HilLS. TX 78180
I '."
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Meadow Lakes PhaSe~ý
Page 2
December 29, 1988
(
PAVING PLAN
5. A note should be made regarding removing the cul-de-sac installed
previously during Phase III.
6. A 40 foot diameter temporary cul-de-sac should be designed and
incorporated into these plans. If for some reason there is a delay in
starting Phase V, this cul-de-sac will assist the fire department as a
"turnaround" for fire trucks.
7. Additional corrections should be made as shown on the plans.
WATER AND SEWER PLAN
8. Proposed manhole rim elevations should be shown on the profile.
9. An offsite utility easement should be submitted for the proposed
offsite sanitary sewer pipe.
10. Adequate provisions should be made for trench safety and the
details should be included in these plans.
11. The general notes on all sheets should be corrected to only allow
PVC water pipe.
12. The storm drain should be extended to the lake as was proposed in
previous concepts.
13. All other corrections should be made as shown on the attached
plans.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
14. The proposed curb inlets should be 15 feet rather than 14 feet.
15. The grading should be revised to create flow arrows as shown.
DETAILS
16. The trench embedment detail for the water line should indicate
cushion sand rather than pea gravel.
17. Only those details which are applicable to this project should be
included on the plans.
'.
I t
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Meadow Lakes Phase~V
Page 3
December 29, 1988
(
The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design
engineer from his responsibility to provide adequate, accurate,
buildable construction plans, nor does approval of the construction
plans signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North
Richland Hills for the engineering contained in the bid documents.
:æ:'
. ! /'
~ ~ ..~/../'
~---þ~~~
~evin B. Miller, P.E.
cc: Mr. George Tucker, Planning Manager
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Economic Development
Jepartment:
~ Request of Richmond Bay for Final Plat of Lots 36
I . Subject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
I - Other
I
1/23/89
Council Meeting Date:
PS 88-37
Agenda Number:
through 43, Block 10, Lots 18 through 20, Block 11,
and Lots 1 through 3, Block 13, M~adow Lakes Addition
(Phase V).
This Plat Application is presented for consideration.
on Skylark Circle.
The subject property is located
All Engineering comments have been satisfactorily answered with exception of #13.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Plat Application PS 88-37
with the following stipulations:
1.
Phase IV PS 88-36 and Phase V be constructed at the same time.
2.
Engineers comments be resolved prior to filing of plat.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should act on the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
/7
K/)///~
t Head Signature I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
t Finance Director
1
Page 1 of
C-2
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
R-7- MF
C-2
-#"; ."'"
-
«
o
tI'J
1C
..
o
s.u.
age
P & Z Minutes
Ie January 12, 1989
I PS 88-36
APPROVED
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I B. PS 88-37
I
I
I
I PS 88-37
APPROVED
I
Ie
I
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 88-36 with the stipulation that
Phases IV and V be constructed at e
same time and that the install- g of a
fence be worked out at Fair Court.
This motion was seconded Mr. Wood.
Mr. Barfield said
clarify the fenc
wrought iron.
they need to
it be
Mr. Fra stated they have a
tion regarding fencing.
stated this one would
feet.
Mr. Wood asked when should this fence
be installed.
Mr. Barfield said he felt it should be
before final approval of the
subdivision.
Mr. Bowen amended his motion to
include a 6 foot wrought iron fence
with brick columns prior to final
approval of the subdivision. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and
the motion carried 7-0.
Request of Richmond Bay Development
for final plat of Meadow Lakes
Addition, Phase V.
Mr. Barfield stated this plat should
be approved with the same stipulations
as PS 88-36; they should be
constructed together.
Mr. Wood said it also should be
subject to the Engineer's comments.
Mr. Barfield made the motion to
approve PS 88-37 as staff recommended
and subject to the Engineer's
comments. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e·
I 16800 Dallas Parkway
Suite 1 50
Dallas, Texas 75248
214 / 248-0126
I
(
(
WORRELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
engineers · planners
January 11, 1989
Mr. Kevin B. Miller
Asst. Director Public'
Works"! Util ities
CITY OF N. RICH LAND HILLS
7301 N. E. Loop 820
N. Richland Hills~ Texas 76180'
RE: PS88-37 Meadow Lakes' Phase V
Final Plat and Construction Plans
Our File: 88063
Dear Mr. Miller:
We have reviewed your comments in a memo to the Planning &
Zoning Commission dated December 29, 1988 'and have the following
comments:
Attached you will 'find construction schedule provided by Richmond
Bay Development showing the time frame with projected beginning
and ending dates for each of the follo'wing 3 phases.
Final Plat
1. The final plat and construction plans for Phase V were
submitted as a separate document at the owner's
request. The owner' could see no difference in
submitting one final plat and three construction plans
as opposed to submitting three plats and three
construction p-Ians.
2. Corrected
3. Done
4. Done
5. Done
6. Changes 'were· made ; spot elevations shown to ensure a
.5 foot rise in top of curb.
I
I .
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 2 (
1- 4- 89
File: 88063
(
7. We are providing, as previously stated, a schedule for
all phases of construction and feel it is not necessary
at this time to construct the temporary cul-de-sac
during Phase IV and feel that showing the removal of
constructed cul-de-sac to be an unnecessary item. All
other comments have been addressed.
YJater and Sewer Plan
8 . Done
9. We feel ,that connecting 2 inletswith a 21-inch RCP
questionable design and y¡ould like to discuss this
matter with you; also we question the reason beh ind
installation of a manhole at the junction of the two
pipes. All storm drainage in Meadow lakes Phases III,
IV, and V are designed to carry 100-year storm so that
installation of pipe to carry 5 year frequency all the
way to the river is impractical.
10. Done
11. Trench safety plans and details' will be included in this
set for City approval prior to startup construction.
12. The existing manhole is not in conflict with the new
curb return. All other corrections done.
Storm Sewer Profile
13. I would like to discuss with you the grade changes that
,are only allo'wed' at structures. In this particular
instance a 3% change in grade on an 18-inch line would
hardly be noticeable in the field' and could be
accomplished through 3 or 4 joints of pipe without any
damage to the integrity of the pipe. Use of an 18-inch
pipe significantly reduces the velocity as in the 15-inch
pipe was in' partial flow.
14. Done
Details'
15. Done
16. Done
If you should have any further comments on this project we would
be more than happy to meet with you and your immediate supervisor
at your earliest convenience in an attempt to speed up the process.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 3 (
1-4-89 ;
File·: 88063
(
Sincerely ~
WORRELL & SSOC IA TES, INC.
W-
"~~
JFH :jf
cc: Bob Frank
, \
I . , ;-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
City of JXõrth Richland HiUs, Texas
,&J~
====-~ r --
December 29, 1988
REF:
Memo to:
Planning & Zoning Commission
From:
Kevin B. Miller
Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities
Subject:
PS 88-37 MEADOW LAKES PHASE V
Final Plat and Construction Plans
I have reviewed the above referenced documents and offer the following
connnents.
FINAL PLAT
1. Phase 3, 4 and 5 were all submitted simultaneously. It appears
that construction of each phase is to proceed in sequence and
relatively quickly. All three phases could have been submitted as one
plat with only the construction taking place in phases. This was
brought to the Architect's attention prior to review. Since the
Architect elected not to revise his submittal, each plat has been
reviewed on its' own merit.
2. The bearing noted in paragraphs 7 and 25 is incorrect. The angle
should be changed to 65 degrees 37 minutes 10 seconds. This change
should also be made on the drawing.
3. The "7.5 foot Storm Sewer" easement should be revised to a "15
foot Drainage" easement.
4. There are other minor errors which should be corrected as shown.
PAVING PLAN
5. The general notes on all sheets should be corrected as shown to
only allow PVC water pipe.
(817) 281.Q041n301 N.E. LOOP 8201P.O. BOX 18809/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 78180
--
, ,
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
il
II
I
,
-
~Ie
'I
Meadow Lakes Phase<:
Page 2
December 29, 1988
(
6. The intersection at station 0+00 appears to be designed too flat.
The gutter along the west side of Meadow Lakes Drive currently drains
to the north. As designed, gutter flow will be lost to the west and
travel along Skylark Circle. The intersection should thereföre be
revised as shown.
7. Additional corrections should be made as shown on the plans.
WATER AND SEWER PLAN
8. Proposed manhole rim elevations should be shown on the profile.
9. The storm drain should be shown on a sheet separate from
utilities. The storm drain should be revised as shown and a pipe
constructed to carry the 5 year frequency storm all the way to the
river.
10. The waterline should be revised to eliminate any radii less than
200 feet.
11. Adequate provisions should be made for trench safety and the
details should be included in these plans.
12. All other corrections should be made as shown on the attached
plans.
STORM SEWER PROFILE
13. Grade changes are only allowed at structures. In addition, a
minimum pipe size of 18 inches is required for all public storm
drain, unless a significant reduction in velocity is achieved.
Anything less than 18 inch should be discussed with Public Works.
14. All other corrections should be made as shown on the plans.
DETAILS
15. The trench embedment detail for the water line should indicate
cushion sand rather than pea gravel.
16. Only those details which are applicable to this project should be
included on the plans.
I .. ...\ '"
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Meadow Lakes Phase~
Page 3
December 29, 1988
(
The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design
engineer from his responsibility to provide adequate, accurate,
buildable construction plans, nor does approval of the construction
plans signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North
Richland Hills for the engineering in the bid documents.
~ ' ~- . ~-~~
Xevin B. Miller, P.E.
cc: Mr. George Tucker, Planning Manager
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLA'ND HILLS
Department:
taubject:
Eauipment Services
Authorization of signatures for unmarked license
pl;:¡t:~~, R~~olt1t';on No.. 89-4
Council Meeting Date: 1-23-89
Agenda Number:..GN 89-05
Since September 1987, the State of Texas, Highway Department requires each
City to provide a list of employees authorized by the City Council to sign
for and order license plates to be used on certain unmarked vehicles.
This list must be approved by the City Council and submitted to the State
once every year. The new Resolution No. 89-4 supersedes Resolution No.
88-6 approved on February 22, 1988. The new Resolution contains the names
of the same two people who normally handle City vehicle documents.
Recommendation: Approve attached resolution authorizing Jeanette Rewis
and Thomas Powell to sign any document necessary to obtain license plates
and vehicle titles.
e
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.) JiLÃ-
egf:;~ting Bud et 0i
_ i"O _[NVViLJ ~
I -/1 ~
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number N/ A
Sufficient Funds Available
( ¡J;
f l!lJ~
City Manager
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
RESOLUTION NO. 89-4
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS THAT:
1.
The Chief of Police of The City is authorized to designate
and use such unmarked license plates for vehicles as he may deem
necessary for the purpose of transporting juvenile offenders, criminal
investigations, and for performing official police duties.
2.
The following persons are authorized to handle the
registration and licensing of unmarked vehicles; Jeanette Rewis,
and Thomas Powell.
Passed and approved this
day of
1989.
APPROVED:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for City
- ---------
I-
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~epartment:
Subject:
Public ~;rorks ~ Council Meeting Date: 1-23-89
Public Hearinq :- Ccmnunity Deve10pnent Block Agenda Number: GN 89-06
Grant - Resolut10n No. 89-5
-
The purpose of this Public Hearing is to receive ci tizen input regarding needs of our
low to moderate incane neighborhoods. All ci tizens, groups and organizations of our
City are welcane to participate and be represented in the fonnulation of the 15th year
plan. This Public Hearing is open for public advice, camrnents, complaints, questions or
presentations of alternative pro¡:x:>sals. The public may present their views in writing
by obtaining a questionnaire fran the Ci ty Secretary, complete it and return it to her
office.
Based on discussion with County Staff concerning eligible CDBG projects within our City,
we feel that reconstruction of Jerrell Street from Charles Street to Bonzer Street will
qualify. It is unknown at this time how much grant money we will receive as it will
depend on the resul ts of the ranking process that will take place at the Tarrant County
Court House in March. The attached Resolution must be passed if the City Council
chooses to recornœnd the reconstruction of Jerrell Street for the 15th year.
Recorrmendation:
The staff recorrmends approval of the attached Resolution and subnit Jerrell Street
Project for Comnuni ty Develo:Pœnt Block Grant Funding for the 15th year.
I
I
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/A
Sufficient Funds Available
-All! (2I/{J~
ead Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
P;::tnA 1 nf 1
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I ATrEST:
I Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
I
I Rex McEntire, City Attorney
I
Ie
I
RESOLUTION NO. 89-5
RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ENDORSING THE 1989 COMMUNITY
DEVElOPMENT PROOECT FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RI~ID
HILLS, TEXAS
WHEREAS, the Ci ty of North Richland Hills shares in a cooperative
agreement with Tarrant County for essential cœmuni ty developnent assistan.ce
activitives under Public Law 93-383, the Housing and Conmunity Developnent
Act of 1974, as amended; and
, WHEREAS, at least one public hearing for the purpose of identifying
and discussing cœmunity developnent needs, and receiving and adopting Ccmnunity
Developnent Projects, have been duly held by the City of North Richland Hills; and
WHEREAS, after said public hearing and due consideration, the Jerrell
Street Improvements Phase I, was eligible for funding under this Act, and approved
the filing of application for said funding; and
WHEREAS, it is understood that any funds not expended on the specifically
approved project will revert to the Corrmunity Developnent Contingency Fund, and
should any repayment of funds be required by BUD due to ineligible or non-fundable
projects, the City would be responsible for repayment.
NOO, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills that said 1989 Cœmunity Develoµœnt Project for the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas, be approved and endorsed.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of January, 1989.
Tarmy Brown, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
I
I
I
I
I
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I-
I
. ( . . (
:Qµ;?TIONN~ FOR CDBG CITIZEN PARTICIPA145N
. . County Commissioner and City Council would like to find out what your
~ our h · f · b· d f h·· · · 11
mmunity needs are. T e 1n ormat10n 0 ta1ne rom t 1S quest10nna1re Wl
~~ used to develop programs using Community Development Block Grant funds
that Tarrant County will request from the Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
Date
City
Name of the ~treet where you live:
Your interest and cooperation will help make your city and community a better
place to live. .
Please put an "XU in the box that best answers the question of need.
PROJECTS:
~10ST NEEDED NEED DON'T NEED
CJ CJ c:J
CJ CJ CJ
CJ CJ -CJ
CJ CJ CJ
CJ CJ r=:J
CJ CJ CJ
Repair of houses
Street improvements
Curbs and gutters
Sidewalks
. Storm drains
Removal of archi tectural .,
barriers (Example: Ramps
for the handicapped)
Senior centers
.
CJ CJ CJ
CJ CJ c:J
c:J CJ' c:J
Flood and drainage improvements
(example: channel improvements)
,,'ater and sewer
In my' opinion, the most important single need of my community out of the above is:
Other services my community needs are: (Please list them)
~iy .conunents (other things I would like to tell my Cou·nty COn1-~issioner and City·
Council) are:
Notices on community development. public meetings are published in area newspapers.
ci~izens' co~~ents and input are welcome. Please return this form to the city
officials at the end of·thç public hearing, or address ~Titten comments to:
Tarrant County P1anning Department
100 W. Weatherford Street
.Fort ~orth, Texas 76102
Thank you for your participation!
12
.-
. .. .. . --
---
I-
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Finance
C ., M . D 1/21/89
ouncl eetlng ate:
GN 89-07
Agenda Number:
General Fund - 1987 /88 Year End Adjustments
I
The Fund Balance for General Fund is the accumulation of excess revenues over
expenditures, also referred to as General Fund "Reserves". It is essential that a
sufficient contingency reserve be maintained to provide for unexpected financial needs.
The standard cri teria for determining the minimum reserve balance is to keep an amount
sufficient to operate the City for a period of 6 to 8 weeks; or 12 to 15% of the
following year's budgeted expendi tures . This industry standard is prescribed by our
fiscal agent, auditors, and bond rating agencies.
The preliminary results of the 1987-88 fiscal year audit indicates that a draw down of
the reserve balance occurred in the amount of $473,343, which results in a fund balance
of $1,237,673.
Actual Revenues per Audit
$10,668,285
Actual Expenditures
11,141,628
Excess Expenditures over
Revenues
$ (473,343)
Fund Balance at 9-30-87
$ 1,711,016
Fund balance at 9-30-88
$ 1,237,673
I
~
I
I
~
~
, Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
~'I
This represents a reserve of approximately 5 weeks or 10.5%, which ~uld be viewed
unfavorably by the bond rating agencies. The desired fund balance should be at least
$1,500,000, which equates to 13.5% of the adopted fiscal year 1988/89 budget.
In order to establish an adequate fund balance, it is proposed that the costs of
administering the capital improvement programs, which have been- previously paid by the
General Fund, be charged against interest earnings which have accrued from investment of
temporarily idle bond funds while projects have been in various stages of planning and
construction. It is standard practice for cities to pay all engineering and
administrative costs from such interest earnings, rather than from the General Fund; .
therefore, the proposed adjustment amounts to a bookkeeping entry which will reimburse
the General Fund for Ironies it has previously advanced to the Capital Improvements
Fund.
It should be emphasized that the principal amount of fund allocations which were
established for construction of street, drainage and other projects will be untouched,
and will remain available for completing these projects as promised. The City's ability
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/ A
Sufficient Funds Available
/J1~
. Finance Director
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
;¡.<,
Page 1 of 5
"~ ..1f. t"',>;·,,, ~¡>.".:~: ;:>i':''è- C!f;" ^' '~;;;' ~':':11"~ .> -.....<f-}; ~-
I",
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
£1
'I
~'I
;1
to undertake new and unanticipated projects will be reduced, but this SeelTIS to be
consistent \ri-th the--Ci-ty--Ceuncil' s -comnitment to hold· the Ad Valorem Tax rate to the
owest possible level.
An analysis has been made to determine why actual expenditures and revenues varied fran
those amounts anticipated. The results are discussed below.
Revenues - Forecast vs Actual
,..
In fiscal year 1985/86 a fiscal management tool was developed to improve our ability to
forecast revenues, utilizing historical revenue trends involving five years of history.
Current monthly revenues are compared against statistical trends of each revenue source,
standard deviations are noted and appropriate adjustments are made.
For the fiscal year 1987/88 actual revenues ccrnpared to the revised forecast are as
follows:
Revised Revenues forecast
$10,402,753
Actual Revenues per Audit
10,668,285
Incane in Excess of AIrount
Forecasted
$
265,532
The $265,532 represents a difference of 2 1/2% above the projected revenues of
$10,402, 753. Statistically a standard deviation of approximately 2% can be regarded as
a successful forecast model.
nditures - Bud et vs Actual
The anticipated shortfalls in revenues last year were recognized ear ly enough to attempt
to adjust departmental expenditure budgets accordingly. Each department initially was
requested to reduce their individual budgets by 5% in January and an additional 2% in
March 1988.
The attached Table 1 shows a listing of those departments that overspent their 93%
budget by $25,000 or rrore. Total expenditures were $587,422 above the anticipated
amount. If expenditures had conformed exactly to the 93% budget, there ŸlOuld have been
a $114,079 addition to General Ftmd reserves.
Primarily the overages can be attributed to three departments (see Table 1), Police,
Fire and Conmuni ty De",elopnent. The total overage for these deparbnents amounts to
$544,041 which represents 93% of the total excess. A ð.etailed analysis indicates that
these overages can be classified into the following categories: 1) revenue producing
expendi tures , 2) unrealistic budget reductions, 3) vacation accruals, 4) prior year
encumbrances, 5) increased costs for our insurance fund not anticipated, and 6)
miscellaneous departmental overages which individually are insignificant.
The definitions of the categories described above are:
1. Revenue Producing Expenditures - are expenditures of funds that
generate offsetting revenues such as detention services, auto
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
t:;'
~r~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
it
,I
impoundment, and IroWing.
Police - Illegal Alien Detention
Police - Auto Impoundment
Camrunity Developnent - Mowing
$ 68,351
18,784
32,987
Total
$120,122
Revenues from these sources were originally budgeted at $32,767 and
actual collections were $160,107, an increase of $127,340.
2.
Unrealistic Budget Reductions - can be defined as departmental cuts that
were ma.de which, if implemented, would have required addi tional lay-off
of personnel, salary cuts, or cuts in service levels.
Police - Salaries and Supplies
$121,968
$ 46,838
$168,806
Fire - Fire Apparatus Maintenance
Total
3.
Vacation Accruals - generally accepted accounting principles for
governmental uni ts require the Ci ty to record the current portion of
vacation leave earned, but not taken, as an expense of the current
year. This has been in effect since fiscal year 1984, but the accruals
are usually a "wash" from one year to the next. In 1988, employees took
fewer vacation days than were earned; therefore, the cash accrual
increased aOOve the previous year to the extent indicated below.
Police $ 17,652
Fire 24,047
Conmunity Developnent 9,193
Total $ 50,892
4.
Prior Year Encumbrances - i terns that were budgeted and ordered in the
prior year (1986-87) but were not received until the following fiscal.
year(1987-88). Again, this item normally washes out from year to
year, but was excessive in 1988.
Police
Fire (Repeater System)
$ 4,378
97,626
'Ibtal
$102,004
5.
Increased cost for insurance coverage comprised of fiscal year end
adjustments made by our auditors to record unpaid claims or
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'1
~I
liabilities for health, workmens compensation, or general liability.
Police $ 26,564
Fire 19,619
Cœmunity Developnent 9,730
'Ibtal $ 55,913
6 · Miscellaneous Depa.rbnental OVerages - can be defined as those
expenditures in accounts such as supplies, maintenance, and general
services which, viewed individually, are insignificant in a canbined
$5,700,000 + budget.
Police
Fire
Carmunity Developnent
Total
$ 25,203
9,070
12,031
$ 46,304
$544,041
Grand Total
History of General fund Reserves
Historically, the City of North Richland Hills has managed the amount of the General
fund Reserve to maintain an acceptable level without penalizing taxpayers by allowing it
to becane excessive. At sane point, a truly excessive rese:rve ftmd could be possibly in
violation of state law. Following is a chronological st1lTl't1ëlry of changes in fund Balance
since 9-30-84:
fund Balance as of 9/30/84
$2,448,731
Draw down fiscal year 1984/85
(672,087)*
fund Balance at 9/30/85
$1,776,644
Draw down fiscal year 1985/86
(149,597)
fund Balance at 9/30/86
$1,627,047
Increase to fund Balance fiscal
year 1986/87
fund Balance at 9/30/87
83,969
$1,711,016
Draw down fiscal year 1987/88
(473,343)
fund Balance at 9/30/88
$1,237,673
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
A separate report (IR 89-05) is included with this packet to update the City Council on
the status of 1988-89 operations. Various alternative means of avoiding a similar
currence regarding over expenditures will be discussed at the City Council meeting.
* Planned reduction due to excess of reserve fund.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I· .
1
1
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Recarmendation:
t is recarmended that the General Fund be reimbursed by $325,000 from CIP Fund interest
arnings, effective September 30, 1988, to establish a year end reserve fund of
$1,562,673.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I
I
Ie -
~ r-i ex> ~ C"") \0
I ~ ~ ex> 0 ~
~ffii¡~ LO r-t ~ ~ ex>
, ... ... , ...
~ C"") LO \0 ~
C"") r-i \0 ('V') lO
C"") ...... ~ ex> ~
, , , ...
I fZp..~ ~ C"") N ~ 0
I'"""i
U
,..... ,..... ,.....
~,..... N C"") \0 r-i N
I t' ~ t' ex> N
~~~!~ ~ ex> \0 C"") ~
, , ... , ,
ex> 0 ~ C"") ~
LO ~ ~ ~ ex>
N ...... Lt)
tj ~g ""'-" ""'-" ""'-"
I I~~!!~ t' r-i ~
00 t' LO r-i 0
r-i ~ LO \0 ~
I 0 , N , ,
CI) , ~ , C"") ~
~~ ~ LO C"") C"- N
t' C"") N C"")
HCI) ~
I ii~
I~~~~~ ,..... ,..... ,.....11
~ 0 ...... N ~
r-i ~r-t LO t' N ~ C"")
~ C"") ~ ~ N
;;~~ ... ... ... , ,
Ie ~!~~I ...... 0 r-t \0 0
ex> LO \0 r-t I'"""i
...... N C"") co
""'-" ""'-" ""'-" '-'"
E-iog?ð
I ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ N C"") co
LO LO 00 C"") N
o ~ C"") ~ ~ ~ \0
, ... ... , ...
~ÇQ r-t 0 r-t t' r-i
~O\ C"") r-t 00 ...... ~
I H .-t ~ C"") ~ ~ r-i
U ... ... , ,
C"") N LO .-i
.-i
I dP~~ t' r-i \0 N \0
co \0 0 LO 0
ex> 00 r-t C"") N
C"") ~ ... , ... , ...
0'\ ex> N CT\ t' ~ ~
i=Q0\ ~ r-f 00 t' lO
r-i r-t ...... C"") 00 lO
I , ... , ,
C"") N ~ 0
.-i
I r-f r-f t' ~ C"")
~~ ~ M N ~ ~
C"") N LO C"") ~
, , ... , ...
q. 0 00 ...... ~
L{') t' ~ 0\ \0
~O"\ C"") C"") q. ...... C"")
I ...... , , ... ...
C"") N LO .-t
r-t
iß- iß-
I ..µ ..µ
~ ~ en
~ ..µ ~ .µ
I ~
Ie ~t
r-I
~ ~~
:~ ~
~ ~ ~ o~
r-I
I -r-t ~ ß
r-I r-I
~ -..-I ~ g
~ u
I.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
1 Department:
.Ubject:
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
Ie
Administration
Designation of One-Way Traffic on
Little Ranch Road - Ordinance No. 1592
Council Meeting Date: 1/21/89
Agenda Number: GN 89-08
In an effort to assist school children walking from North Park north to Foster Village
Elementary, the Council directed that little Ranch Road be made one-way north bound
during school hours. Attached is an ordinance which establishes this one-way street.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 1592.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
Ot~~~~ .. Rrt~
J '
(I Department Head Signa~;~y COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager
Page 1 of
, Finance Director
1
I~
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1592
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
~ _ HILLS, TEXAS, THAT:
1.
That certain public street known as Little Ranch Road, in the City
of North Richland Hills, is hereby designated as a one-way street
northbound during the following hours:
From 7:30 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays,
Thursdays and Fridays of each week from September 1st of each year until
June 1st of the following year.
2.
No person shall operate a motor vehicle upon said street in
violation of this ordinance. Any person who violates this ordinance
shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not in excess of
$200.00.
3.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED and APPROVED this
day of
, 1989.
APPROVED:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I ~ep~rtment:
I Subject:
Public Works .. Council Meeting Date: 1-23-89
Approve Purchase of Right-of-Way from
Dollie Enq1and for the Purpose of Constructing Agenda Number: PU 89-06
Smithfield Road Sidewalk
The staff has negotiated with IX>llie England to purchase right-of-way from her land that
fronts on Smithfield Road. Mrs. England would not sign our :pennission letter for the
sidewalk because of potential liability problems. Because she wanted to be canpensated
for granting an easement, the decision was made to acquire right-of-way instead.
The negotiated price is $1,243. 75, which equals $1.25 :per square foot for pro:perty that
is zoned. R- 3 .
Recorrmendation:
The staff reconmends approval of payment for right-of-way on Sroi thfield Road to Dollie
England in the amount of $1,243.75.
e
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
., Other
---GCL
Finance Review
Acct. Number 13-08-87-6050
Sufficient Funds Available
,
nt Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Fenance Director
P~nA 1 nf 1
I
---
Ie
I
CITY OF NORI'H RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
RIGHT-OF-WAY
STATE OF TEXAS
x
x
KrOC)W ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
<DUNTY OF TARRANT
I
That I, Dollie Enqland , as Sellers, for and in
consideration of the agreed purchase price of One Thousand 'I\-Jo Hundred
Forty-Three and 75/100 Dollars ($ 1,243.75), and upon all of the terms and
conditions hereof, hereby grant, sell and convey to the City of North Richland
Hills, a municipal corp::>ration of Tarrant County, Texas as Buyer, a perpetual
right-of-way for the purpose of constructing, improving, widening, maintaining and
using a public street with drainage facilities as may be required and the further
rights to construct, improve, operate and maintain water, sewer, or other public
utilities in, under or upon said right-of-way, as described on the plat attached
hereto, which plat is made a part hereof, and/or described as follows:
I
I
(SEE ATTACHED PLAT AND LEX;AL DESCRIPTION)
I
The agreed purchase price includes full accord, satisfaction and
caupensation for all demands of the Seller, subject also to the following special
conditions, if any:
I
To have and hold the sane perpetually to the City of North Richland Hills
and its successors and assigns forever.
I
Executed this the 12th day of January, A.D., 1989.
j)~f!a-, d~<Ad_
Dollie Englan
SELLERS
I a ADDRESS OF GRANTEE:
_ City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76180
I
STATE OF TEXAS X
<DUNTY OF TARRANT X
I
This instnnœnt was acknowledged before Iœ on the 12th day of January,
1989 by Dollie England.
\
I
lv.~j r1 'þ ~~
Notary Public, State of s
I
'I ( )
. /;
'. ,\
" I " . I
MY Cœmission Expires:
, " c ,
4-22-89 /,,~
. ,
" .:. ~ . . \ \
Notary I sPrinted Narœ:
I
Mark D. Bradley
STATE OF TEXAS X
I
CDUNTY OF
x
I
19_ by
This instnnœnt was acknowledged before Iœ on the _ day of
Notary Public, State of Texas
I My Catmission Expires:
Ie
Notary I s Printed Name:
L
·
I
---
w
Z
-I
TRACT DESCRIBED TO DOYLE
FINCHER ErUX WARY AS RECORDED
VOL. S133. pO.alo. DRTeT
PARCEL lOR
I
w
Z
H
-I
X
uJ
.....
Z
LLI
U
=-
m c
a: n:
:J
LI
20.5
.....
c.n
Þ-4
X
W
I
~ ~
o ~
a: r
a..
VI
o <
-.J ~
W ::r
H
lL ;
I 0
.- Œ
H ~
2 ~
(f) :a
I ~
a: ~
W Œ
.-J. ~
-1
W
~
22.~
5 8,gc38'QSIl E 9.50
J.
~ ..
~~~
I
I
TRACT DESCRIBED TO A.D.
ENGLAND ETUX RECORDED
VOL.a7sa. PG..1.1I. DRTCT ----j
'---- -----
w
E
I
SCALE
J.n.40'
N 89·2.2.'38" W 9.50
I
POINT OF BEGINNING
SKETCH SHOWING
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
KELLER-SMITHFIELD ROAD
TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS
I
LOT ~. BLOCK 2
SMITHFIELD ADDITION
VOL. 311-.165. PG.
48 DRTcr
( SEE FIELD NOTES )
I
DES C RIP T 1 0 ~
I
ALL that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the John ~t. Crockett Survey, A-2ì3,
and hei ng a port ion of that S<1nw t rac t convl~yed to n. n. Eng land e t ux, as d~sc ri hed in
Deed rel~ordf'd jn volume 2752, Page 118, Deed Records, Tarrant C(\unty. Te"xas and being
ore particularly described by metes and hounds as fo]lo\:s:
I
B E(a l'-rn I ¡.; Cat a p ( ) i n tat the E<1 S t b a c k () f (' U rho f K ell e r - S m i t h f i L' J d {o ad (.:.l pub 1': c
right-of-way), said point bein~ South 89 degrees 22 minutes 38 sec()nds East at 2J. ~
feet from the Soutlnvest corner of said tract reconlt.>d in Volume 2752, Page IlH, Deed
Records, Tarrant County, Texas;
I
THENCE North 00 degrees 09 minutes 53 seconds East along said back of curb, 104.67
feet to a point on the North bnundary line of said tr:1ct recorded in Volume 2752,
Page 118, Deed Records, Tarrant County, ';'exas:
I
111[:\C[ Sputh 89 degrees 38 minutes 46 sec<'Inds East :11(mg the :~orth lint' of said tract
recorded in Volume 2752, Page 118, Deed Records, Tarrant C0unty, Texas, 9.50 feet to a
po i n t ;
1lIE~¡CE Sout h 00 deg rees 09 minu tes 53 seconds ,~cs t, 1 O!~. ì 2 fee t to a poin t on the Sou th
boundary 11.ne of said tract recorded in Volume 2752, Page 118, Deed Records, Tarrant
County, Texas;
I
TII[~CE ~orth 89 degrees 22 minutes 38 seconds \-Jest along said South houndary line, 9.50
feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.0228 acre of land.
I
I
DAVID C. MOAK
SURVEYORS, INC.
REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR
P.O, BOX 1034 268.2211
HURST, TEXAS
DATE 1-10-89 NO'86-550-10R
I
1:. Of r~
~ ~ ..·f..C:..f':
c}... ~1\ .....,d'
*... ~t .~.
.................,..
1.~~XI~ ~~.M!~~.~. t
~... 4565 ~..
.# ,\..,
':9 · .~..' .1.' ~~.. f.<; ~
'Ie SU~~~·
-~~-
I TYPE 3
L
I·
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
.Ubject:
Public Works
Approval of Martin Dr1ve Pav1ng & Dra1nage
Improvements - Change Order No. 2
~ Council Meeting Date: 1-23-89
Agenda Number: ~w 89-03
-
'!he proposed Change Order No. 2 is for 4 foot wide, 4 inch thick reinforced concrete
sidewalk along the north side of Martin Drive fran Sinmons Drive east to Precinct Line
Road.
The cost for the Change Order No. 2 will be $29,232.00.
Funding Source:
Sufficient funds are avail~~le fram Unspecified 1987 GO Streets and will require a
transfer as indicated below:
Fran
13-90-99-4310 $29,232
Unspecified 1987 GO Streets
To
13-05-87-6150 $29,232
Martin Drive Construction
e
Recarmendation:
The staff recarmends approval of Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $29,232
and transfer of funds as indicated above.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
wOther
GO
Acct. Number See above
SUff~eß; Available
~~~/
-W . I<I/L ~
City Manager
. Finance Director
t Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
P~nø 1 nf 1
I·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
G-/Í -€!-l
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
January 16, 1989
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E.
Director of Public Yorks
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: 3-347, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
MARTIN DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS,
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
Attached is Change Order No. 2 for the referenced project which has been
signed by the Contractor, Austin Paving Company. This change order covers
the cost of constructing a 4-foot wide, 4-inch thick reinforced concrete
sidewalk, with l-inch cushion sand, on the north side of Martin Drive from
Simmons Drive east to Precinct Line Road.
The proposed sidewalk will be located about 4-feet back of curb (if
possible) with minor adjustments in alignment as required to avoid
obstructions such as power poles, fire hydrants, etc. In some places, the
sidewalk may have to be constructed adjacent to the back of curb if
approved by the Council. It is not anticipated that any retaining wall
construction will be required.
After approval by the Council, we will instruct the Contractor to proceed
with the sidewalk construction. Please return a fully executed copy of
the approved change order form to our office for our files and for the
contractor.
questions concerning this Change Order, please do not
TEN/lld/F3347C02.RUNI
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager
Mr. Bill D. Rutledge, City Inspector
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
'"
/
K-E-F NO. 3-347
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO THE CONTRACT YHICH YAS DATED
SEPTEMBER 26, 1988
Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
(OWER)
And AUSTIN PAVING CONSTRUCTION CO.
(CONTRACTOR)
For (Description of Project)
MARTIN DRIVE - PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS :
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract,
this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change
the work of the Project as follows:
~construct approximately 3,248 L.F. of 4' wide sidewalk along the North Side of
Martin Road from Simmons Drive to Precinct Line Road as shown on sheets 6R,7R,
8R,9R and lOR.
Add the following New Items to the existing Contract items:
ITEM
NO.
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
EST.
QUANT.
TOTAL
COST
DESCRIPTION
ISP. 4" Thick Concrete Incl. Reinf. Steel
for Sidewalks, Complete in place
S. F . $2.25
12,992.00 $ 29,232.00
$ 29,232.00
$ 29,232.00
$ 717,670.04
$ 746,902.04
SUBTOTAL . . . . .
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST.
EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT.
. . . . . .
. . . . .
Contract completion time shall be increased by 25
this change.
calendar days because of
CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE:
By: B~~~~~:~ presi~~:
ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE:
Jan~T 12,
, 198-g-:.
By:
{2wv~lAJr .~
, 198ß'}
J" / ~
Date:
OYNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE:
By:
Date:
, 19817
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
-SUbject:
Public t\Torks
Approval of Martin Drive Paving &
Drainage Inprovements - Change Order No. 3
Council Meeting Date: 1-23-89
Agenda Number: PW 89-04
~
The proposed Change Order ~Jo. 3 is for extending an existing 6" sani tary sewer east an
additional 150 feet in order to provide service to two (2) properties on the east side
of the Simmons Drive intersection at the top of the hill.
The cost for Change Order No. 3 will be $4,938.54.
funding Source:
Sufficient funds are available in Utility Unspeèified and will require a transfer as
indicated below:
Fran
02-09-99-6700 $4,939.00
Utility CIP Unspecified Misc. Projects
To
02-09-82-6750 $4,939.00
Martin Drive Sewer System Improvements
I
I þe staff reccmænds
J transfer of funds as
I
1
I
I
Recomœndation:
approval of Change Order No. 3 in the amount of $4, 938 .54 and the
indicated above.
I Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
1_ Operating Budget
~ _ Other
FEV
Finance Review
Acct. Number See above
unds Available
. Finance Director
ent Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
City Manager
Paoe 1 of 1
IP
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
January 16, 1989
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E.
Director of Public Yorks
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: 3-347, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
MARTIN DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS,
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
Attached is Change Order No. 3 for the referenced project which has been
signed by the Contractor, Austin Paving Company. This change order covers
the cost of extending the 6" sanitary sewer east about 150' from
Sta. 11+10. The total amount of this Change Order is $4,938.54.
Please return a fully executed copy of the approved change order form to
our office for our files and for the Contractor.
questions concerning this Change Order, please do not
TEN/lld/F3347CO.RUNI
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager
Mr. Bill D. Rutledge, City Inspector
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I ~-,
" .
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
t>
~ - -
K-E-F NO. 3-347
CHANGE ORDER NO. I TO THE CONTRACT WHICH WAS DATED
SEPTEMBER 26
, 1988
Between
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
AUSTIN PAVING CONSTRUCTION CO.
MARTIN DRIVE - PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
(O~JNER)
(CONTRACTOR)
And
For
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract,
this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change
the work of the Project as follows:
Construct approximately 150 L.F. of- 611 dia. (DR-35) PVC sanitary sewer from
Sta. 11+10 east, construct sanitary sewer manhole at Sta. 12+60 and stub-out
411 dia. sanitary sewer service north and south.
Add the following New Items to the existing Contract Items:
ITEM
NO.
2S
3S
4S
UNIT
PRICE
21.10
9.50
1108.54
EST.
QUANT.
150
70
1
TOTAL
COST
-$ 3,165.00
665.00
1,108.54
$ 4,938.54
$ 4,938.54
$ 717, 6-]0.'04"* 7 £f~ J ~ 0 z.. 0"-
$ 7:: ! ,~ ~ 0 . çg
DESCRIPTION
611 Dia. PVC Sanitary Se~/er
411 Dia. PVC Sanitary Sewer
Type nAil Manhole
UNIT
L.F.
L.F.
EACH
SUBTOTAL --------------------------
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ----------------
EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT ----------
REVISED CONTRACT ~10UNT -----------
Contract completion time shall be increased by 10
days because of this change.
CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE:
By: ~;~ Date:
B. t.ëf;; Bertram, E~tive Vice President
January 12 I
, 1989
ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE:
A' J~
By: . ~ Date:
/~/?;:;
, 1989
OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE:
By:
Date:
, 1989
*Contract amount will change upon Change Order No.2 approval by City Council.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Itubject:
Public Works .. Council Meeting Date: 1-23-89
Approve Flnal Pay Estllnate ~~ J.n the AIOOunt or--
$23,467.08 to Austin Paving - Hightower Drive A enda Number:.!!Y 89-02
Street & Dralnage Improveznents 9
This CIP project was awarded by the Council on February 22, 1988 for $451,620.97 to
Austin Paving. The total contract amount after change orders was $462,021.90. Final
payment to the Contractor will make his total earnings on the project $461,048.18.
The Contractor substantially completed this project in September, 1988. The project is
now totall~7 camplete with all final adjustments having been made.
Ftmding Source:
Sufficent funds are available as shown below.
I
~
13-04-86-6150
13-04-86-6170
$ 414.68
$ 23,052.40
Total
$ 23,467.08
Recornnendation:
The staff reconmends approval of final payment to Austin Paving in the amount of
$23,467.08. .
e
~
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
_Oth
GO
Finance Review
Acct. Number See above
Sufficient &v~
7/ { G....r <' -----/
--w ~t(¿/M
City Manager
. Finance DIrector
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
P~"ø 1 nf 1
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
January 5, 1989
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E.
Director of Public Yorks
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas
76180
Re:
3-343, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
HIGHTOVER DRIVE STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
CONTRACTOR'S FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 9
Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Final Pay Estimate No.9, dated December
16, 1988, made-payable to Austin Paving, in the amount of $23,467.08, for
materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of
November 30, 1988.
The quantities and conditions of the project have been verified on-site by
your representative, S.L. Zuckman, as indicated by his signature on the
estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions.
The total Contract amount is $462,021.90 including change orders. Final
Contractor earnings total $461,048.18, which is $973.71 under the Contract
amount. The original contract completion time was 170 days. Ten (10) days
were added by change order no. 1. The revised completion date was September
24, 1988. The project was substantially complete on September 22, 1988,
therefore no liquidated damages were incurred.
The two (2) year term of maintenance begins on this date and therefore, will
terminate on January 5, 1991. The maintenance obligation includes repair of
all water line leaks and malfunctions of all valves, fire hydrants, and other
equipment furnished and installed under this contract along with storm sewer
and sanitary sewer line breaks or stoppage. The maintenance obligation also
includes sealing of pavement cracks, repair of pavement buckling or other
failures resulting from storm drain backfill settlement or other subgrade
failure, along with failure of all concrete flatwork and other concrete
structures such as storm drain vaults and inlets (See Item.3.2.11.a).
Ve recommend that the final payment, in amount of $23,467.08, be made to
Austin Paving, P.O. Box 947022, Fort Yorth, Texas 76147.
Please call if you have any questions.
Continued next page ...
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
January 5, 1989
HIGHTOVER FINAL ESTIMATE
RICHARD V. ALBIN, P.E.
RYA/lld/F3343final
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager
Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks
Mr. Larry Zuckman, City Inspector
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Mr. Barry Clark, Austin Paving
Page
2
I
- -.....
CON T R ACT 0 R ' S EST I HAT E
Date:
Cal. Days:
HIGHTOVER DR. STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS V.O. Date:
Scheduled Completion Date:
For Materials Furnished and Labor
Performed in Period Ending:
Time Charged Thru Period (Days):
tstimate No.
II No. F3343.V20
P ect Description:
I
9 & FINAL
Contractor: Austin Paving
fwner: City of North Richland Hills
lace: North Richland Hills
... - -....
Job No. 3-343
ITEM DESCRIPTION
PREVIOUS THIS
UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
i~:
--.....--...................-
ASPHALT PAVING CONSTRUCTION:
lIP. UncI. Street Excavation c. y.
2P. Subgrade Stab. w/Lime Slurry S.Y.
13P · Lime For Stab. Subgrade TONS
4P. Deleted S.Y.
5P. Deleted S.Y.
6P. Deleted S.Y.
17P. Deleted S. Y.
8P. Deleted L.F.
9P. 6" Thick Cone. Valley Gutter S.F.
lOP. Type "D" HMAC for Misc. Uses TONS
IP. Saw Cuts L.F.
12P. 5" Thk Cone. Driveways S.F.
.3P. Adj. V.V. Boxes to Fin. Grade EACH
~ Adj. 55MB Lids to Fin. Grade EACH
~ Extra York · HHAC Curb L.F.
I
DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION:
lID.
2D.
13D.
4D.
5D.
6D.
17D.
8D.
90.
~OD.
10.
2D.
.....-...
.....-...
TOTAL
........-
2,454.00
11,294.00
213.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,336.00
357.00
317.00
1,272.50
0.00
10.00
97.00
TOTAL AMOUNT BID, ASPHALT PAVING IMPROVEMENTS
57"x38" CGH Pipe
24" CGH Pipe
3600 PSI Concrete for Vault
60" Dia. RCP
30" Dia. RCP
18" Dia. RCP
15' Vide Std. Curb Inlet
10' Vide Std. Curb Inlet
6" Thick Concrete Cap
10' Open Back Inlet
Furn. & Inst. Safety Systems
CO 2, 57 x 38 CMAP Material
2,454.00
11,294.00
213.42
0.00
0.00 .
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,336.00
357.00
317.00
1,272.50
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
97.00
L.F. 1 , 381 . 00 0.00 1 , 381 . 00
L.F. 84.00 0.00 84.00
L.F. 22. 10 0.00 22. 10
L.F. 10.00 0.00 10.00
L.F. 457.00 0.00 457.00
L.F. 233.00 0.00 233.00
EACH 2.00 0.00 2.00
EACH 6.00 0.00 6.00
EACH 45.00 0.00 45.00
EACH 1.00 0.00 1.00
L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00
L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00
I
I
Ie
I
TOTAL AMOUNT BID, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS :
UNIT
PRICE
...........
$4.69
1.67
73.46
0.20
0.04
2.31
2.76
6.67
2.37
24.46
2.12
2.90
220.00
285.00
4.50
$59.15
35.50
322.00
99.00
33.26
20.43
2,260.00
1,613.00
49.50
2,475.00
1,830.00
1,233.38
Page 1 of 3
16-DEC-1988
170
28-HAR-1988
14-SEP·1988
30-NOV-1988
247
AMOUNT
...........
$11,509.26
18,860.98
15,677.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,166.32
8,732.22
672.04
3,690.25
0.00
2,850.00
436.50
$65,595.40
$81,686.15
2,982.00
7,116.20
990.00
15,199.82
4,760.19
4,520.00
9,678.00
2,227.50
2,475.00
1,830.00
1,233.38
$134,698.24
I
CON T RAe TOR'S EST I HAT E
Page 2 of 3
............ -......
IEstimate No. 9 & FINAL Job No. 3·343 Date:
F~e No. F3343.V20 Cal. Days:
ØIIIect Description: HIGHTOVER DR. STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS V.O. Date:
Scheduled Completion Date:
I For Materials Furnished and Labor
Contractor: Austin Paving Performed in Period Ending:
Owner: City of North Richland Hills Time Charged Thru Period (Days):
Iplace: North Richland Hills
PREVIOUS THIS UNIT
NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE
.~.. .......................... - -.
~ATER CONSTRUCTION:
.........
16-DEC-1988
170
28-HAR-1988
14-SEP·1988
30·NOV-1988
247
AMOUNT
.........
.........
...........
......-....
I IV. 24" Dia. Ductile Iron Pipe L.F. 1 , 293 . 00 ~ 0.00 1,293.00 $44.09 $57,008.37
2V. 8" Dia. Ductile Iron Pipe L.F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.30 0.00
3V. 6" Dia. Ductile Iron Pipe L.F. 270.00 0.00 270.00 15.00 4,050.00
4\1. 6" Gate Valve & Box EACH 2.00 0.00 2.00 270.00 540.00
Isv. Ductile Iron Fittings TONS 2.42 0.00 2.42 3,120.00 7,550.40
6V. Fire Hydrants EACH 1.00 . 0.00 1.00 970.00 970.00
7V. Long Single Vater Service EACH 2.00 0.00 2.00 670.00 1,340.00
~ 8V. Short Single Vater Service EACH 8.00 0.00 8.00 270.00 2,160.00
9V. Misc. Plumbing Allowance L.S. 0.09 0.00 0.09 2,000.00 180.00
OV. 24"Horz. GV w/By·Pass & Boxes EACH 1.00 0.00 1.00 9,700.00 9,700.00
iIV. Furn. & lnst. Safety System L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,700.00 1,700.00
2\1. CO 2, Special Fittings L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 5,122.83 5,122.83
TOTAL AMOUNT BID, VATER IMPROVEMENTS $90,321.60
II~ CONSTRUCTION:
115. 10" Dia. PVC San. Sewer Pipe L.F.
2S. 8" Dia. PVC San. Sewer Pipe L.F.
35. 6" Dia. PVC San. Sewer Pipe L.F.
145. 4" Dia. PVC San. Sewer Pipe EACH
55. Type "A" San. Sewer Manhole EACH
65. Furn. & Inst. Safety System L.S.
0.00
911.00
0.00
4.00
2.00
1.00
I
CONCRETE PAVING CONSTRUCTION:
IIIC. 8" Thk (Cl."A") Cone. Paving S.Y.
2C. 6" Curb & 24" Gutter L.F.
TOTAL AMOUNT BID, SEVER IMPROVEMENTS
8,754.00
3,236.00
I
I
I
Ie
I
TOTAL AMOUNT BID, CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS :
0.00 0.00 $15.00 $0.00
0.00 911.00 14.00 12,754.00
0.00 0.00 13.00 0.00
0.00 4.00 250.00 1,000.00
0.00 2.00 860.00 1,720.00
0.00 1.00 540.00 540.00
$16,014.00
0.00 8,754.00
0.00 3,236.00
$15.81 $138,400.74
4.95 16,018.20
$154,418.94
IEstimate No.
FJiI No. F3343.V20
IWect Description:
I
Contractor: Austin Paving
-ewner: City of North Richland Hills
Irlace: North Richland Hills .
NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION
r·· .............................
I
I
I··········................. ................................................... '" ...........
Field Verification of Job Conditions Approved:
Ind Confirmation of Pay Quantities Knowlton.English.Flowers, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
By: ?ee DI2AFT GoP" . By: ~ W, ~.
l4IJowner's Project Representative) (Project Manager)
Date: ,19_ Date: 1- ? ,19 81
I·················.. ... ................. ............ '" ............ '" .......................
I THIS MONTH'S BILLING:
Street: 414.68
Drain: 23,052.40
I Vater: 0.00
Sewer: 0.00
I TOTAL:
I
CON T RAe TOR'S EST I HAT E
-....... -. -... -....
9 & FINAL
Job No. 3·343
Date:
Cal. Days:
HIGHTOVER DR. STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS V.O. Date:
Scheduled Completion Date:
For Materials Furnished and Labor
Performed in Period Ending:
Time Charged Thru Period (Days):
PREVIOUS THIS
UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE
--...-...
.........
.........
-.-.-......
TOTAL AMOUNT BID :
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less Percent (%) Retained . .
Difference . . . . . . . .
Plus (%) Materials on Hand
75%
Total . . . . . . . . . . .
$23,467.08
Less Previous Payments
Difference Due This Estimate
(Note: Pay Last Amount Shown)
Page 3 of 3
16·DEC-1988
170
28-HAR-1988
14-SEP·1988
30-NOV-1988
247
AMOUNT
...........
$461,048.18
$461,048.18
0% 0.00
461 , 048. 18
0.00
461,048.18
437,581.10
$23,467.08
461048.18 Bid: 451,620.97
247 Time: 170
. ........ ............. ...................... ............................ ......... ...... ......
-~~---~...._--
.--.~.-.~---..._-.....-
If tal Earnings (Incl. Retain.):
Ifme Charged Thru This Period:
Percent:
Percen t :
I
I
Ie
102.09
145.29