The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1989-02-13 Agendas I I I 1 1 I ~I ~I jl .........................'.....·.·.'.·.·..1 ;¡ii ';if; '':1 ......."............'..:..~..;..'... .j! .."............................·'·.1 ,J,j :~ f~ 'I'; ...:..'.............'.............. .. ?:~~ f<'I" '....~................'.....:....;.......'.... ~: r'; ~\I" r:..·....~.,..·..·.~.·.·....·.................. ~~ I - . ~;{ ";'>::ÆÄ CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 13, 1989 - 5:45 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Presentation by Judge Charles Thorn - Re: Teen Court (15 Minutes) 2. GN 89-12 Project Partners Grant Application (Agenda Item No. 15) (10 Minutes) 3. GN 89-16 Interlocal Agreement with Haltom City for Golf Course Project (Agenda Item No. 19) (5 Minutes) 4. PU 89-07 Designation of Mid-Cities Daily News as the Official Newspaper (Agenda Item No. 20) (5 Minutes) 5. PW 89-06 Approval of Miscellaneous Paving and Drainage Improvements 1988 - Change Order No. 2 (Agenda Item No. 21) (5 Minutes) 6. IR 89-11 Southwestern Bell IITexas Firstll (15 Minutes) 7. Status of Jail Overcrowding Solutions - Mayor Tommy Brown (5 Minutes) , . I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ~I - ~ Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 8. Items on Consent Agenda not on Pre-Council - Items No. 14, 16, 17 & 18) (5 Minutes) 9. Possible Work Session (5 Minutes) 10. Other Items (5 Minutes) 11. *Executive Session (20 Minutes) a. Personnel b. Briefing on Pending litigation c. Review of Progress on land Acquisition 12. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 13, 1989 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting January 23, 1989 5. Minutes of the Special Meeting January 30, 1989 6. Resolution in Memorial of Jack Frisque 7. Special Presentation to Richard Ward 8. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 9. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 & 21) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 10. PZ 88-6 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - Request of Americity Federal Corp. for rezoning of Tracts lA1 and 1A7, Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399, from AG (Agriculture) to C-l (Commercial), R-8 (Zero-Lot-line) and R-3 (Single Family) (located South of Bursey Road, East of Rufe Snow and West of Western Oaks Addition) 11. Ordinance No. 1553 12. PZ 88-21 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - Request of J.B. Johnston for Rezoning of lots 1R and 2R, Block 6, Meadow lakes Addition from R-1 (Single Family) to 0-I-PD (Office Planned Development) (Located on Southwest corner of Rufe Snow at Meadow lakes Drive) 13. Ordinance No. 1591 *14. GN 89-11 Set Date for Public Hearing on Smithfield Road - Ordinance No. 1594 *15. GN 89-12 Project Partners Grant Application I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *16. GN 89-13 Management Contract Addendum _ Resolution No. 89-11 *17. GN 89-14 Approve Speed Limit on Amundson Drive of 35 MPH - Ordinance No. 1593 *18. GN 89-15 Authorization of Advertising Sale of Revenue Bonds *19. GN 89-16 Interlocal Agreement with Haltom City for Golf Course Project *20. PU 89-07 Designation of Mid-Cities Daily News as the Official Newspaper - Resolution No. 89-8 *21. PW 89-06 Approval of Miscellaneous Paving and Drainage Improvements 1988 - Change Order No. 2 22. Citizens Presentation a. Mr. Cliff Stevens 9201 Kirk Lane Re: Burning Permit b. Mr. Clayton Collins 3852 Diamond Loch Drive West Re: Violation of City Ordinances 23. Adjournment ~ I Ie ·1 :1 I I I I I Ie I 'I II I I il I Ie I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. 89-11 Date: February 9, 1989 Subject: Southwestern Be 11 "Texas Fi rst U The attached information on "Texas Firstll is provided for your information. Mr. Gary Terry, our Southwestern Bell representative, will be present Monday night to answer any questions you may have. Rex McEntire, who is knowledgeable and is very familiar with the PUC regulations, will also be present to explain the effect of the raise in the rate of return from 12% to 11%-13% and a 1/2 refund system versus the full refund system now in effect. The City Council may wish to formally support this program, via Resolution at the next City Council Meeting. City Manager DH/gp ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I if' . SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE "TEXAS FIRST" Texas First would: . . . . - Fr~eze basic J.o~al. telephone rates for five years... Th~s would prov1de Texas customers a sense of stability in one aspect of ' the home and small business bUdget. - Provide the latest in teleph:..~~~ switchinq technology to all areas of the state, both ..:~tropolitan and rural... This would provide a strong telecommunications infrastructure for the economic development of all Texas communities. City of all sizes in the state would be on equal footing in retaining local businesses, encouraging expansion and attractinq new growth. - Reduce SOUthwestern Bell's charges to lc~q distance carriers. . . This would provide the impetus for Lon~ Distance companies to pass along those savings ~n the form of lower long distance charges for Texas rate~ayers, again providing a s~nse of "peace of mind'.' when J.t comes to the bUdgets of hom~owners and small busJ.ness men and women. - Eliminate four-party service OVer a five-year period... This would update and vastly im~rove the te12phone service of ~any outlYinq cc::ununJ.t¥ and in m:::y cases, eliminate.c~3tly mileage charges ~~=urre~ by customers who live J.r: :9mote area~ of the ,;;:.; :3. Expand the option::!l callinq SCopes ~ound Some metropolitan area~... This wciuld increase the economic base of smaller cities that are adjoined to larger metropolitan areas by removinq any pe==eived barriers created by long distance calling. Te~as First is qoQd for Texas, good for Texas customers and good for SOUthwestern Bell. - Texas First provides the opportunity for an inteqrated statewide tele~hone '. -:twork thê -: wo~ld Þlace Texas second ~o nO~e J.n.a~trac~J.r.;-new bUsJ.~;s~. At least ~5 states are ~xplor~nq regulatory al~ernat~ves to facil~tate mass~ve improvements in theJ.r telephone networks. Texas must not be left behind. - Texas customers would not see an increase in their basic local service rates for f1ve years. Xh~s wOU~à ensure the Texas' telephono rates J:'ema.1n among the lowest in the nat.ion.· SoUthwestern Bell would be allowed to earn a return on its Texas investment within a ran e ot 11 to 13 Dercent. ep ac~ng e curren~ 2 percent ce J.ng W a range of return would provide the company the incentive to innovate its Texas network. 1 - I Ie I ~I I I I ,I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Texas First: A Win;Win Alternative for the '90s When it comes to attracting new jobs, Texas has a lot going for i t-good roads, plenty of space, a growing labor pool and a quali ty of life that is the envy of most other states. As we look to 1990 and beyond, however, an important new magnet for economdc development is entering the picture. It's CãIled state-of-the-art telecommunications. And from Hondo to Houston, it's being recognized as a moàern-day necessity for keeping existing businesses healthy and competing for new business growth down the read. In years past, the differences between old and new telecommunications technology weren't all that significant. Calls went through ei ther way. And expectations were a lot simpler. Today's needs are a different story. Texans depend on the telephone network for so much more than transmitting voice messages. In today/s telecommunications world, comcuters talk back and forth with each other...at faster and faster speeas. More and more, the traffic that moves over the Texas network is high-speed data... facsimile...even high-definition video images. If anything, this trend will accelerate as the state's economy and business in general become more dependent on information to get things done. SCBÐFAD: Is Texas teleCCllllllJr1ications UD to the test? The answer is yes...and no. Southwestern Bell has plowed mdllions of investment dollars into the state over the last decade in anticipation of the coming flood of computer applications and the economic opportunities it would bring. On balance, we've built a technically superior network in Texas, and we also take pride in basic local rates that are among the lowest nationwide. So, where's the problem? The problem, simply put, is that our work is not yet finished. We won't be satisfieci-and our customers and reçulators won' t be satisfied-until all Texas communi ties, large and small, have access to advanced telecommunications technoloqy. Regrettably, today that's not the case. As ambitious as our past modernization efforts have been, there are still certain areas of the state where our services and technoloqy could not be called fully modern. Meanwhile...same of Texas' leadinq rivals for economic growth-states like California and Florida-are moving full steam ahead with massive upgrade proqrams designed to put in place all- electronic networks ~ the mdd~1990s. I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I 2 And, as with so much else today, our competitors abroad are getting into the act as well. Japan, in fact, is outspending us two to one as it prepares its telecommunications for the future. At current investment rates, experts predict our Asian rivals will deploy a modern public telephone network a full decade before we're able to in Texas... 5tJBHFAD: Here's an idea we want ~ to consider wi th so much on the line, it's become evident that a status quo approach to telecOIDDILmications in Texas may no longer be good enough. we've spent a great deal of time exploring possible solutions. From the start, we knew we had to come up with a plan that made sense economically for Southwestern Bell, protected the local telephone consumer, but at the same time had a real chance of helping Texas communities compete for new jobs and business growth. In a nutshell, here's the action we're suggesting. We call this proposal our Texas First plan: - Southwestern Bell would aqree to a massive, accelerated ~rade of our Texas net:wOr~. Over a five-year penoà, we'd phase out four-party service statewide and replace the older switching facilities of approximately 200 communities with the most modern digital technology. In addition, the network would be reconfigured to provide a number of "fringe" communities an attractive alternative to the toll rates they now must pay to communicate with their metropolitan neighbors. frozen - Charœs paid by long distance cœamies to access ' Sou~stern Bell's local network would be reauced, so that- ~ese companles, ln turn, can reduce their customers' long distance rates. - Finallv, refinements in the current r~ato~framework vcul.d bè soucmt... to heJ.p sotten the ns of e comau. tments we I re willing to make ~ but also to create a climate in which the company, its customers and indeed all Texans are rewarded when Southwestern Bell manages its business well. 5DBBFAD: But wait a minute. Isn't re<n1latian the verv reason we en;oy a quÏùj. tv system tcaavl Without question, telecommunications regulation has served Texas and the entire nation well for nearly three quarters of a century . I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 3 But the system in place today hasn't been updateå since the days of the hand-cranked telephone--a remarkable fact given the dizzying speeà wi th which technology has been advancing. Make no mistake: Southwestern Bell is not making an argument for deregulation. There will always be ã:ñeed for safeguarås to ensure that local telephone service is high in quality and widely affordable. However, like at least 2S other states today, we're calling for a new regulatory outlook. In the simplest of terms, we're trying to shift the focus so that regulation isn't seen strictly as a way to prevent "bad" things from happening.. . but as a broader opportunity to make some "good It things happen, too. 5UBBFAD : Whv not a "share-the-successn accroach to reaulation in .J Texas? In effect, traditional regulation has created a Catch 22. Because it places a·fixed ceiling on our profits, Southwestern Sell, unlike most businesses, does not automatically get to enjoy the improved earnings that result when a new service is successful or a new efficiency enables us to further reduce costs. In fact, the closer we get to our earnings ceiling, the more likely we are to be "rewarded" with an order to give back earnings in the form of lower rates. Not surprisingly, this fact of regulatory life tends to diminish our financial incentive to implement new services or to invest in technology that could help trim costs. For our customers and for the state as a whole, it short- circuits innovation and new efforts to improve efficiency at a time when both are critical. With Texas First, we are willing to freeze local rates for five years and we are willing to risk the accelerated investment needed to fully modernize our Texas network for the 1990s and beyond. In·return, we are seeking a change in the process which will allow us to keep at least some of the frui ts of our risk-taking, wi thout customers having to pay for our mistakes. In short, we're asking that the current "ceiling" on what we're allowed to earn on our Texas investment be replaced by a more flexible "ranqen of permissible earnings. . Then, if our earnings increased beyond the high end of the range, we'd aqree to a profit-sharing arrangement with our Texas customers. Half of any amount over the top of the ranqe 't.'CUld be automatically and voluntarily refunded in the form of a credi t on customers' bills. The other half ~d be our "reward" for taking risks that payoff. I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I 4 This share-the-success formula is based on the simle premise that a winlWin approach to regulation will produce får more tangible long-ter.m benefits for Texans than one that discourages and sometimes even penalizes innovation and efficiency. TEXAS FIRST: A SUMMARy OF BENEFITS ...to us ...to our Texas customers o Improved customer relations o Access to a highly versatile, state-of-the-art public switched network o New revenue and expense savings opportunities o More incentive to introduce new services and efficiencies o No increase in basic local rates for five years o Greater flexibility to Compete o More opportuni ty to enjoy the fruits of our risk-taking o Massive, rapid upgrade of our Texas network o Elimdnation of four-party service o Potential savings on long distance bills, resulting from reduced charges to long distance companies o Expanded local calling options for several "fringe" communities adjacent to metropolitan areas o An opportunity to share any profits above a benchmark level StJBBFAD: Sor is there any risk to you? Very Ii ttle, if any at all. We did our best to make Texas First acceptable to Texas telephone consumersr and we intentionally built in the safety assurances we knew customers would need to feel comfortable. To reiterater the changes we are proposing... ...will not increase the cost of basic local telephone service; . ...will actually make possible a five-year local rate freeze; 'I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 5 ...will not remove the traditional regulatory oversight or local service quality and affordabilitYi and ...will result in economic benefits that directly or indirectly touch all Texans. SUBaEAD: What do vcu think? If you think Texas First makes sense, we'd like you to stanâ up and be counted. --4' -I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I Rowland CUrry I P .E. Director, Telephone utility Analysis Division Public utility Commdssion of Texas 7800 Shoal Creek Blvd. Suite 450N Austin, Texas 78757 Bill Dunn Director, Public Information Division Public utility Commdssion of Texas 7800 Shoal Creek Blvd. Suite 4S0N Austin, Texas 78757 ,Also CC'your resolution to: Frank Sturzl Executive Director of Texas Municipal League 211 East Seventh Street Suite 1020 Austin, Tx. 78701-3283 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST lOOP 820 - JANUARY 23, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order ,January 23, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. Present: Tommy Brown Richard Davis Lyle E. Welch Mack Garvin Virginia Moody Byron Sibbet Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Mike McEntire 2. ROll CALL Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman City Manager Senior Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney Absent: Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman Linda Spurlock Councilwoman Rex McEntire Attorney 3. INVOCATION T,.. _ --,..s Councilman Garvin gave the invocation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 9, 1989 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the minutes of the January 9, 1989 meeting. Motion carried 4-0; Councilwoman Moody abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 5. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Davis removed Item No. 17 from the Consent Agenda. I· I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I January 23, 1989 Page 2 6. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (7, 8, 9, 10, 11~ 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, & 21) APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 5-0. * 7. PS 87-45 REQUEST OF COLLINS INVESTMENTS FOR REPlAT OF LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK 1, NORTH HILLS VILLAGE ADDITION (LOCATED AT SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF LOOP 820 AND STATE HIGHWAY 26) APPROVED * 8. PS 88-30 REQUEST OF MARVIN D. SMITH FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 8 AND 9, BLOCK 5 MAROAKS ADDITION (LOCATED ON LINCOLN DRIVE) APPROVED * 9. PS 88-31 REQUEST OF RICHMOND BAY FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 13R-16R, BLOCK 10, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION (LOCATED ON SOUTH SIDE OF MEADOW LAKES DRIVE) APPROVED *10. PS 88-34 REQUEST OF WILLIAM AND ALISA NELMS FOR FINAL PLAT OF lOT 1, BLOCK 1, NELMS ADDITION (LOCATED ON EAST SIDE OF CRANE ROAD) APPROVED ~ *11. PS 88-35 REQUEST OF RICHMOND BAY FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 20-24, BLOCK 10, AND lOT 1, BLOCK 11 MEADOW LAKES ADDITION (PHASE III) (LOCATED ON PROPOSED EXTENSION OF SKYLARK CIRCLE) APPROVED *12. PS 88-36 REQUEST OF RICHMOND BAY FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 25-35, BLOCK 10 AND LOTS 2-17, BLOCK 11, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION (PHASE IV) (LOCATED ON THE PROPOSED EXTENSION OF SKYLARK CIRCLE) APPROVED I' I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I January 23, 1989 Page 3 *13. PS 88-37 REQUEST OF RICHMOND BAY FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 36-43, ·BLOCK 10, LOTS 18-20, BLOCK 11, AND LOTS 1-3, BLOCK 13, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION (PHASE V) (LOCATED ON SKYLARK CIRCLE) APPROVED *14. GN 89-05 AUTHORIZATION OF SIGNATURES FOR UNMARKED LICNESE PLATES - RESOLUTION NO. 89-4 APPROVED 15. GN 89-06 PUBLIC HEARING - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT - RESOLUTION NO. 89-5 APPROVED Mr. Line stated the purpose of the public hearing was to hear testimony from interested citizens on the proposed use of the funds. Mr. Greg Dickens, Director of Public Works, advised that the City recommended the funds be used for improvements to Jerrell Street. Mayor Brown opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to come forward. Mr. Thomas Riley, 6828 Megan, appeared before the Council. Mr. Riley asked what-the funds were for and how the determination was made on how the funds were to be used. Mr. Line stated that the funds came from H.U.D. and the guidelines were set by H.U.D. Mr. Line stated the funds had to be used in low income areas and not too-many areas in North Richland Hills met the criteria. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Brown closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Resolution No. 89-5. Motion carried 5-0. *16. GN 89-07 GENERAL FUND - 1987/88 YEAR END ADJUSTMENTS APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I January 23, 1989 Page 4 17. GN 89-08 DESIGNATION OF ONE-WAY TRAFFIC ON lITTLE RANCH ROAD - ORDINANCE NO. 1592 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No. 1592 with the hours being from 7:30 a.m. until 8:30 a.m. and from 2:00 p.m. until 4:30 p.m. Motion carried 5-0. *18. PU 89-06 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM DOLLIE ENGLAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING SMITHFIELD ROAD SIDEWALK APPROVED *19. PW 89-03 APPROVAL OF MARTIN DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 APPROVED *20. PW 89-04 APPROVAL OF MARTIN DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 APPROVED *21. PAY 89-02 APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE #9 IN THE AMOUNT OF $23,467.08 TO AUSTIN PAVING _ HIGHTOWER DRIVE STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED 22. CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mr. Gilbert Caldwell, 6813 Old Mill Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Caldwell stated there were a lot of grass fires in his neighborhood on Sunday. Mr. Caldwell stated you could say someone was setting them, but he felt that someone was not keeping their property in order. Mr. Caldwell stated that the Inspection Department needed to look at the property, and the Council might need to review the ordinances pertaining to tall grass. Mayor Brown advised the City did have Code Enforcement Officers. Mayor Brown advised that the Code Enforcement Officers had received tall grass complaints from citizens and the grass had been cut. Mayor Brown advised Mr. Caldwell to notify the Inspection Department if he saw property that needed to be mowed. 23. ADJOURNMENT I Ie I I I I I I I -- ,I I I I I I I Ie I January 23, 1989 Page 5 Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary · . I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JANUARY 30, 1989 - 6:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order January 30, 1989, at 6:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Lyle E. Welch Virginia Moody Byron Sibbet Linda Spurlock Mayor Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire City Manager Senior Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney Absent: Richard Davis Mayor Pro Tem Mack Garvin Councilman Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman 3. GN 89-09 AWARD OF BIDS ON GOLF COURSE CONSTRUCTION APPROVED Mr. C.A. Sanford advised that bids were opened on January 25th. The low bid for golf course construction was received from The Bruce Company of Wisconsin in the amount of $681,630.85. The low bid for paving, drainage and utility improvements was from M.A. Vinson Construction Co. in the amount of $527,423.42 Mayor Pro Tem Davis and Councilman Metts now present. Mr. Sanford advised that time was not sufficient to complete the staff analysis of the irrigation/pump station installation and a recommendation would be presented in two weeks. Mr. Sanford stated the Staff recommended the bids be approved. Councilwoman Moody asked if a copy of the budget for the golf course could be obtained. Mr. Sanford advised he would get the Council a copy of the budget. ~~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I January 30, 1989 Page 2 Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the bid of The Bruce Company of Wisconsin in the amount of $681,630.85 for golf course construction and the bid of M.A. Vinson Construction Co. in the amount of $527,423.42 for paving, drainage and utility improvements. Motion carried 6-0. 4. PW 89-05 CONTRACT WITH TARRANT COUNTY FOR COUNTY THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS _ RESOLUTION NO. 89-7 APPROVED Mr. Line stated that the County had proposed to construct an east/west thoroughfare across North Richland Hills. Mr. Line stated the County proposed to acquire all right-of-way by donation, provide all labor, materials and equipment. Mr. Line stated the City would be responsible for constructing and maintaining all street approaches to the new roadway, constructing construction and maintaining traffic signs, roadway markings and traffic signals. Mr. Horvath advised this agreement should be approved by North Richland Hills contingent on approval by the District Attorney and that all changes by the District Attorney would be reviewed and approved by the Attorney for the City. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Resolution No. 89-7 contingent on approval by the District Attorney. Motion carried 6-0. * 5. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION a. PERSONNEL b. LITIGATION Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting to executive session. BACK TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the regular meeting back to order at 9:11 p.m. with the same members present as recorded. 5A. GN 89-10 ACTION ON CLAIM BY TOWN AND COUNTRY CAR WASH APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve $6,650.00 settlement on the claim of Town and Country Car Wash. Motion carried 6-0. 6. ADJOURNMENT f ,.. I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I January 30, 1989 Page 3 Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 6-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary ~\ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I fRtsølutiøn No. 89-10 <t!itv of N ort1t Bicltlanà ){ ills WHEREAS, clwúng hh, ti6e að a lLu.i.d.ettt 0-6 NoJtth R.ic.hla.ruf. H-i1.t6, Jac.k Fwque gave /,ILeef.y 0-6 hh, tÅme aruf. .tai.et1t.6 to plLomote public. plLojectð aruf. to ..únplLove the ti6e 0-6 lLu.i.d.et1t.6 0-6 the Ci;ty j aruf. WHEREAS, Jac.k Fwque -6eJr.ved. will cLLõünc:ti.on on the c.¿v-ii. SeJlv"¿c.e C01TJTT1.Ú,-ð"¿Ot1 olr the Ci;ty; attd WHEREAS, Jac.k Fwque depaJLted. thh, ti6e on JattUalLY 20, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLANV HILLS, TEXAS, thlLt: 1 . Thh, Wy Council. dou heJr.eby go on lLec.oJr.d .in -601LC.e.6ul explLu-6.ion 0-6 thankð to Jac.k Fwque -601L hh, many e6-60~ -60 /,ILeef.y experuf.ed. by h£m -601L the good 0-6 the c.itizet1-6 0-6 th.i.-6 Wy. 2. Upon hh, death, the Ci;ty Councii. expILU-6U fu deeput -6ympathy to the Iramiiy olr Jack Fwque. PASSED ANV APPROVED th.i.-6 13th day 0-6 FeblLuaILY, 1989. APPROVEV: ',,- OIL A TrEST: a If· . /J -/,,, /:' ....... LL--M>'~ ~<J J !Jnet;te Rw-ú:. - CUy SeCJLe:taILY '" . . ~ -. .~' ..:....~ ,.i'~ .~:~.! '¡.:~.~\ .(.,.:.L;:"",,~ .'~~ ~ I ,I_ I :,1 I I I '·1 I. I_ I I I I I I I I_ I ..... - ~".~ ,.. '..'- ..:'.... .._" I ,,--.._~.; '. .... .!.~- ~"'-_._-._. ,. , . ../ ~ . '"', , ' '~.." \j~& CitY of ~\}Q:, '. :~orth 1Uchland Hills r .' WHEREAS,. the act 6,£., lLUklng 0 ne I -6 own -60.~e;ty -in oltdVt to .6ave. anothVt l.ó R.,¿ß.e. .w the ul.Lúna:te. au 0-6 hVto~m; and WHEREAS I .óuc.h an act 0-6 hVtoL6m WM . d.1tamatic.aiJ:y p~oJUne.d in .thL6 Cdy on JanuaJty 25th, 1989 by Ric.haJtd WaJtd when he .óaved t.he .u..Vf¿6 oft two .ómaiJ: c.hildJten who welLe .tÝlJtea,tened by an apaJr.hne.nt /}JAe¡ and WHEREAS, MIt. WMd p~o1UTled .thL6 ad wdhoLLt ltegClJtd to hL6 own .ó%rU:.y and well-bung ¡ an.d WHEREAS, tltL6 au 0-6 hVtoL6m by MJt. WOAd duVtvu .6peciaf Itec.ognition. ' NOW, THEREFORE, I, Tommy Bltown~ MayolL o~ the C~y 0.6 Nouh R-ic.h€.al1d H-<-U6 do hVteby Pltoc1.a.ún Tuuday, FebltuaJty 14t.h, 1989 M: "RICHARV WARV DAY" -in the Cliy 0.6 Nouh R-ic.hland H-<-U6 and Wtge aiJ: ei.tÙeM .to join in thL6 day 0-6 ·'Jtec.ognition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hVte.un.to .ó e;t my han.d and c.ac.u ed .the .6 eaR- o~ the Cay 0-6 Noltth R'¿c.Ý1land H-<-U6 to be ~ed thL6 the 13.th day o~ FebltuaJty, f 1989. I'~ I ~epartment: I Subject: I I I I I I .. . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Economic Development 2/13/89 Council Meeting Date: Public Appeal Hearing on Request of Americity Federal Agenda Number: Corporation ,for Rezoning of Tracts lAI and lA7, Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399 from AG to C-l Commercial, R-8, and R-3. Ordinance 1553 PZ 88-6 On December 8, 1988, the Planning and Zoning commission heard Zoning Application PZ 88-6, a request of the Americity Corporation for rezoning a portion of tracts lAl and lA7, Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399 from AG Agriculture to C-l Commercial, R-8 Zero-Lot-Line and R-3 Single Family Residential. This property is located south of Bursey Road, east of Rufe Snow, and west of Western Oaks Addition. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial. The applicant is requesting that the City Council consider an appeal hearing of the Planning and Zoning Commission denial. The City Council on January 9, 1989 established an appeal hearing for February 13, 1989. This Rezoning Application was originally submitted by the applicant in April, 1988, requesting rezoning from AG to C-I. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on May 12, 1988 and recommended denial. The applicant appealed to City Council at a hearing held on June 27, 1988. The City Council sent the rezoning application back to the Planning and Zoning Commission with instructions that the applicant work with the I ~neighbors to achieve a better plan. The applicant believing that he had reached an ~agreement with the neighbors resubmitted the rezoning request from AG to C-1, R-8 and R-3. ;1 ~!I ~I ¡jl I I I 'e ,~I ~I RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should hold the required public hearing and act upon the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budge Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available /I K 14 (:/~ r . - City Manager vC Depart ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I' e I I I I 1 IJ I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I '\ .. R-2 1109 R-8- 1500 R-2 1453 p-e. <.\S-ø/ø ac..~\ s \i. 1:' ·feW To ~--\ Nrro Jeer "To I I- I I I I I I I 14t I I I I I I I. I I ( ( January 9, 1989 Page 2 Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approv minutes of the December 12, 1988 meeting. Mayor Pro Tem D · minutes stated Mayor Brown called the meeting to ord Mayor Pro Tem Davis. Motion to 6. FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA r Pro Tem Davis removed Item No. 17 from the Consent Agenda. 7. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, & 27) APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 6-0. * 8. PZ 88-6 REQUEST OF AMERICITY CORP. FOR APPEAL HEARING GRANTED . 9. PZ 88-21 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING _ REQUEST OF J.B. JOHNSTON TO REZONE LOTS 1R AND 2R, BLOCK 6, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION FROM R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) TO Q-I-PD (OFFICE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) POSTPONED 10. ORDINANCE NO. 1589 POSTPONED 11. PZ 88-22 PLANNING & ZONI - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF CITY OF NORT ICHLAND HILLS TO REZONE TRACT 1828, J. CONDR· URVEY, ABSTRACT 310, FROM AG (AGRICUL E) TO U (INSTITUTIONAL) (LOCAT AT 7301 BURSEY ROAD) Mayor Brown opened the ublic Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in fa~or of t ·s request to please come forward. Mr. George Tu er, Director of Planning and Zoning and representing North Richland H· 5, appeared before the Council. Mr. cker stated this property was where the Senior Citizens Center was 1 ated. Mr. Tucker stated the reason for this hearing was to give the citizens an opportunity to speak. I' Page 3 P & Z Minutes December 8, 1988 ( ( Ie I 4. PS 88-28 Request of Richmond Ba for final pI 46, Me es Addition. I Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 88-28. This motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the motion carried 7-0.- I I 5. PZ 88-6 Request of Americity Corporation to rezone a portion of Tracts 1A1 & lA7. Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to proposed classifications of C-1 Commercial, R-8 Zero Lot Line Single Family, and R-3 Single Family. This property is located south of Bursey Road, east of Rufe Snow Drive, and west of Western Oaks Addition. I I I Ie Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. I I I -,~~ Steven Sloan came forward to represent Americity Corporation. He said the Commission originally heard their request May 12 for C-1 Commercial for the entire 7~ acres. He said the Commission did not approve the request. Mr. Sloan said they appealed to the City Council on June 27. He said the City Council requested they come back to the Planning and Zoning Commission and also work with the neighbors on a compromise. Mr. Sloan said the 23 acre tract to the west is already Commercial. I I I I Ie I Mr. Sloan stated that between June 27th and October 14th they submitted several plans and had several meetings. He said they came up with a compromise to divide 1~ acres for C-1 which would be less than 15% of. the original zoning request; 2.38 acres of. R-3 next to the neighbors; then 3.96 acres of R-8 between the C-1 and R-3. I I_ I I I I I I I 1_ I I I I I I I I_ I Page 4 P & Z Minutes December 8, 1988 ( ( Mr. Sloan said he feels they have a good stair-step zoning. Mr. Sloan said he received a letter from the neighbors stating they would agree to this request if he would agree to 1500 square foot houses in the R-8, but said he is not agreeable to this. Mr. Sloan said he had provided sample elevations for the R-8. He said he feels this is a good compromise and requests the Commission approve without the 1500 square foot houses. Mr. Sloan requested rebuttal time. Mr. Wood said Mr. Sloan had put the R-3 next to the homeowners group, but there is also R-3 zoning to the east of this property. Mr. Sloan said he had no comment from the neighbors to the east, just the ones to the south. He said there were only eight individuals in the area. Mr. Sloan said he had worked with the City Staff on this request. ,~ Mr. Greene asked Mr. Sloan if he had a market for the R-8; does he think he can sell it. Mr. Sloan said it is much less marketable than the Commercial, but they wanted us to compromise and this is what we came up with. Mr. Greene asked if he would consider R-3 instead of the R-8. Mr. Sloan said they did not want any more R-3 than they had to; they need more lots to make it more feasible. Mr. Greene asked if they plan to develop the property. I Page 5 p & Z Minutes December 8, 1988 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Mr. Sloan said they do not build, they just develop, but would sell without developing. Gilbert Caldwell, 6813 Old Mill Road, came forward. He said Mr. Sloan was correct, he did meet with the residents. He said the residents would like to have 1500 square foot houses in the R-3 and R-8. He said he had talked to a majority of the neighbors. He said Foster Village homes are 1500 square feet or larger. Mr. Caldwell said he feels it should have been R-3 all the way to Bursey Road, but the homeowners are in agreement with Mr. Sloan's request with the stipulation of 1500 square feet homes. Jarrett Miller, 6821 Old Mill Road, came forward. He said he would also like the 1500 square foot stipulation for the R-8. He said the people in Meadow Lakes has R-8 with stipulation added. Mr. Miller said he is not sure how valid this elevation is since they are not going to do the building. ~ Chairman Schwinger called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There were none. Mr. Sloan said he was very glad to hear the comments of the neighbors, but he cannot comply with the 1500 square feet. He said he does not wish the Commission to approve it that way. Mr. Wood asked Mr. Sloan if he was asking for withdrawal. Mr. Sloan said no, he just wanted the Commission to vote on what he had requested. I' Page 6 P & Z Minutes December 8, 1988 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I II I I Ie I ( ( Mr. Sloan said he was not sure how the 1500 square feet is measured. Mr. Tucker said it excludes breeze-ways and garages. Mr. Wood asked what difference the yield would be in the R-8 and R-3. Mr. Sloan said the R-3, 2.3 acres would have 8 lots and the R-8, 3.9 acres would yield 26 lots. He said they can salvage a little more out of the R-8. Mr. Bowen asked if he would agree to just the R-3 being 1500 square feet. He said all of Foster Village Addition is R-3-1500. Mr. Wood asked Mr. Sloan if he would agree to 1500 for the R-3. Mr. Sloan said the neighbors did not ask him that. He said he would have to ask his client; he can not agree to it tonight. Chairman Schwinger closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Barfield said now that Mr. Sloan has met with the neighbors and they have agreed to a compromise, he feels the Commission should approve the request. Mr. Barfield said he does not like the request. He said he would like to see where Crosstimbers is Commercial or Office, but he would go along with this request. Mr. Lueck said Mr. Sloan was asked to go back and work out a compromise and he did. Mr. Wood asked if the developer of Western Oaks was notified. Mrs. Calvert stated he was. I Page 7 P & Z Minutes December 8, 1988 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Mr. Wood said it would be hard to sell R-3 which backs up to Commercial and R-3 which backs up to R-8. He said this applicant is not a builder and we won't ever see this developed; he will sell the land. Mr. Wood stated he appreciated Mr. Sloan working with the neighbors for a compromise, but he does not go along with all that R-8. Mr. Lueck said the developer to the east should have been here if he objected. Mr. Barfield said he felt the Commission is under obligation to approve the request. Mr. Greene said if these people are not builders, just developers, why not wait until the land sells, why zone to speculate. Mr. Barfield said 90% of zoning is speculative, and also it helps the city in their planning. Mr. Tucker said most developers are not builders. ,J Mr. Greene said why be forced to go into a zoning we are not happy with. He asked Mr. Sloan if he has a market for the property at this time. Mr. Sloan said he would sell it now. He said he does not see any reason not to zone the property at this time. Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve PZ 88-6. This motion was seconded by Mr. Barfield. Mr. Wood asked if this motion was to approve as is with no stipulation. Mr.' Barfield said that is correct. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie Page 8 P & Z Minutes December 8, 1988 ( ( The motion was denied by a vote of 2 for and 5 against; Lueck and Barfield for and Bowen, Brock, Wood, and Schwinger against. PZ 88-6 DENIED Mr. Bowen made the motion to deny PZ 88-6. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion to deny carried 5-2; Bowen, Wood, Brock and Schwinger voting for denial and Lueck and Barfield voting against denial. The request was denied. 6. PZ 88-22 Request of the City of North Richland Hills to rezone Tract IB2B, John Condra Survey, Abstract 310, from it present classification of AG Agriculture to a proposed classification of U Institute ale This property is located a 301 Bursey Road. I I Chairman Schwinger ened the Public Hearing and call for those wishing to speak in fa r of this request to please come rward. I I I I I Ie I r stated this is a Senior Citi n Center and the city has a BUD g t to improve it for the Senior itizens. He said the city has the right to use this property in Agricultural zoning, but they wanted to zoning it and give the public the chance to say how they like the center or if they object to it. Mary Ann Gibson, Odell Street, came forward. She said she had been working at the center ever since it opened. She said she has a heart condition and the exercise classes helped her through the stress test. Ms. Gibson said the Senior Citizens help a lot of organizations. She said they made lap robes and lap gowns and made red ribbons for the Mothers Against Drunk Driving. I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWl TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas November 23, 1988 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 88-06.REVISED REVIEY LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO 'C-I,R-8,R-3' REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 40 Ye have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~cJ... Sc~~ SUSAN L. SCHYINGER, G.C.E. . _ -__.1 " SLS/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic Development Director Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning Zoning Review ....,~ PZ 88-06.REVISED 1 Page 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-33~7 I' I, I I I I I I I I~ I I I I I I I~ I I ( (' June 27, 1988 Page 3 8. PZ 88-6 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ APPEAL HEARING ~ REQUEST OF AMERICITY CORPORATION TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACTS lAl, & lA7, THOMAS SPROUSE SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1399, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO C-l (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BURSEY ROAD EAST OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE) Councilman Davis advised that he had an interest in the property adjacent to this request and asked the attorney if that would constitute a conflict of interest. Mr. McEntire advised that it would not be a conflict of interest. Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Steve Sloan, Dallas, representing Americity Corporation, appeared before the Council. Mr. Sloan stated that the property consisted of 30 acres of which 22 1/2 acres was zoned commercial and 7 1/2 acres was zoned agriculture. Mr. Sloan stated they wanted to rezone the entire 30 acres commercial because they felt it would be more feasible. Mr. Sloan stated the Planning and Zoning Commission had denied the request. Mr. Sloan stated he wanted to work with the property owners to try and resolve their protests. Mr. Sloan asked that the Council not vote on the request tonight, but send it back to the Planning and Zoning Commission so amendments could be made. Mr. Sloan asked for rebuttal, if necessary. Councilman Garvin expressed appreciation to Mr. Sloan for being willing to try and work with the citizens involved. Councilman Sibbet asked how long Mr. Sloan felt it would take to work out an agreement. C,,__J Mr. Sloan stated approximately 90 days. Councilman Davis advised that Mr. Sloan would not have to pay a refiling fee but would have to pay for the legal advertising and cost of mailing the notifications. Mr. Gilbert Caldwell, 6813 Old Mill Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. McEntire advised that the citizens input would be heard, but the Council had been asked not to vote on the request and send it back to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Caldwell advised he was speaking in opposition to the request. Mr. Caldwell stated that when he purchased his home he did not anticipate commercial zoning behind him. Mr. Caldwell asked the Council to deny the request. I I, I I I I 1 1 I I' I 1 I 1 1 1 I~ I I - ( ( June 27, 1988 Page 4 Councilman Garvin encouraged Mr. Caldwell to work with the developer to come up with something that would be acceptable to bòth. Mr. Carl Tredway, 6829 Old Mill Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Tredwáy stated he was opposed to the C-1 zoning but felt a compromise could be reached. Mr. Carl Orton, 6849 Old Mill Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Orton stated he was in opposition to the request; that he was against C-1 zoning. Councilman Sibbet asked Mr. Orton if he would have any objections to having a meeting with the developer. Mr. Orton replied no. Mr. Jarrett Miller, 6821 Old Mill Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Miller stated he was Opposed to C-1 zoning. Councilman Sibbet asked Mr. Miller if he would be willing to meet with the developer and try to work out some alternative zoning. Mr. Miller stated he would be willing to meet with the developer. Mr. Jeff Willis, 6817 Old Mill Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Willis stated he was advised the property was zoned Agriculture when he purchased his home, but that it would be rezoned. Mr. Willis stated he was opposed to C-1 zoning but would work with the developer. Mr. Brian Wilson, 6832 Old Mill Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Wilson stated he was Opposed to C-1 zoning; that he would prefer the property to be zoned: R-3. Mr. Sloan reappeared before the Council. Mr. Sloan advised the Council he would work with the homeowners in the area to try and work out some type of compromise. Councilwoman Hinkle advised she would like for the developers to consider R-3 zoning. Mr. Sloan advised he would consider R-3 zoning. Councilman Davis stated he felt it would be beneficial if the citizens involved could see the entire layout of the proposed project. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. I I, I I I I I I I I~ I I I I I I I~ I I ( ( June 27, 1988 Page 5 9. ORDINANCE NO. 1553 TABLED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to send PZ 88-6 back to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried 5-0. 10. SO 88-2 REQUEST OF FEDERAL SIGN COMPANY FOR MESSAGE BOARD SIGN AT 7900 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 APPROVED Mr. Callicott stated yes. Mr. Jim Callicott, Federal Sign Corporation, appeared before the C Mr. Callicott stated the sign would be located at D/FW Volkswa n. Mr. Callicott stated the sign would be visible when the intercha e at Davis/Grapevine Highway and Loop 820 was constructed. Councilman Garvin asked if there would be a new dealer location. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Counc· an Sibbet, to approve SO 88-22. Motion carried 5-0. 11. GN 88-47 ITINE T VENDORS AND SOLICITORS ORDINANCE NQ 1550/REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1357 (TAB AT THE JUNE 13, 1988 MEETING) APPROVED <r/ ___~ . *12. -51 WATER AND SEWER RATE INCREASE - ORDINANCE NO. 1552 APPROVED *13. U 88-36 AWARD OF BID TO RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR A IITIMES TWO" FILING SYSTEM - $8,903.00 APPROVED *14. PU 88-37 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM ANNIE L. BREWER, ET AL FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING SMITHFIELD ROAD (PARCEL #26) APPROVED I Ie I Page 4 P & Z Minutes May 12, 1988 ( ( I I Mr. Wood stated the Comm- n steady record of no owing Industrial to oach into resident He said he would re end that the one lot, Lot 8, ock 1, Henry Addition, be excluded. I I Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 88-2 with the exception of Lot 8, Block 1, Henry Addition. This motion was seconded by Mr. Barfield and the motion carried 6-1 with Mr. Bowen voting against. 3. PZ 88-6 Request of Americity Corporation to rezone a portion of Tracts lAI & IA7, Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to C-I Commercial. This property is located south of Bursey Road, east of Rufe Snow Drive, and west of Western Oaks Addition. I I Ie Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. I I I I · /'~ __.4. . Steven Sloan, share owner of Americity Corporation, came forward. He said he would like to say he appreciated Richard Royston and Wanda Calvert for their help in negotiating this request. I MrQ Sloan stated previously the City had contacted him that there was a building on his property that had become in bad shape and requested it be torn down. He said he took care of that. He stated this request if for 7~ acres. He said the remainder of the 22 acres is C-l Commercial. Mr. Sloan said they wish to create a consistency.of zoning. He said the subject parcel is too small by itself. Mr. Sloan stated their current plan is to develop or co-develop an appropriate commercial and retail property on the entire site after pre-leasing, financing and site plan approvaL. is accomplished. I I Ie I I Page 5 p & Z Minutes May 12, 1988 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Mr. Schwinger asked what the total length of frontage is on Bursey Road. Mr. Sloan stated he was not sure, but he has more frontage on Bursey than on Rufe Snow. Mr. Barfield asked what his plans were since Cross timbers is planned to go through to Bursey Road. Mr. Sloan said the extension of Cross timbers would create two corners. He said it would bisect the property and have Commercial on both sides. Mr. Sloan stated he could have a small doctor's office and on the other side have a shopping center. Mr. Barfield asked if he plans to plat and divide it off into lots. Mr. Sloan said he could have sold the corner of Bursey and Rufe Snow 10 times, but he did not want to. Mr. Tricoli asked if he planned to have a buffer between the commercial and residential. . , - -...! Mr. Sloan stated there are set back requirements of 25 feet and he also plans to put up some type of brick wall. He said he would work with the city staff on this. Mr. Bowen asked what the other Agricultural area is. Mr. Royston stated he believed that is a Lone Star Gas pump station. Mr. Sloan stated the front of the shopping center would be away from the residential; it would face Bursey and Rufe Snow. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. I Page 6 P & Z Minutes May 12, 1988 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Gilbert Caldwell, 6813 Old Mill Road, came forward. He stated he is not against development in North Richland Hills, nor is he against Commercial zoning, but this is in his back yard. He said he feels the present amount of C-l zoning is sufficient and he is not in favor of extending it to the Western Oaks Addition. Mr. Caldwell stated he is against extending Crosstimbers because it would cause more traffic. He said there are a lot of children there with no side walks. Mr. Caldwell asked about the ratio of height of the bUilding. He asked if it is still 1 foot for every l~ feet of height. Mr. Royston stated that is correct. Mr. Sloan stated the front of the building would be on Rufe Snow and Bursey. Mr. Royston stated the front would have a setback of 25 feet and a rear setback of 25 feet. .,,- --3 Mr. Caldwell encouraged the Commission to turn this request down. He said they need to consider the congestion on Bursey Road and Rufe Snow and consider the residential value of the property. Mr. Caldwell said he is employed for the City of Keller. He said there is commercial zoning on the north side of Bursey at Rufe Snow and at Wilson Lane it is zoned commercial and multi-family. Mr. Caldwell requested the Commission keep this piece of property agriculture instead of commercial. Geoffrey Wills, 6817 Old Mill, came forward. He stated this property is at the back of his house. He said he hates to think there could be a two story commercial building behind his house. He asked why they did not build single residential houses there. I Page 7 P & Z Minutes May 12, 1988 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Mr. Wills said it would make congestion in the area. He said he has 4 children. He said he feels they already have enough commercial that would be west of Crosstimbers. Jarrett Miller, 6821 Old Mill Road, came forward. He stated his house value would drop. He said he feels the land east of Crosstimbers should be residential; he has adequate commercial land to the west. Mr. Miller stated we do not need any additional traffic on Rufe Snow. Chairman Tucker called for anyone else wishing to speak to please come forward. Mr. Sloan asked if he could respond to some of the statements. He stated he already has 22 acres of commercial and this is just a small additional area. He said the extension of Crosstimbers is not his idea; it is North Richland Hills. Mr. Sloan said concerning the rear set backs, he would not object to a restriction of a 40 to 50 foot rear set back. Chairman Tucker closed the Public Hearing. ..>-.! , Mr. Tricoli stated he is in opposition to having commercial against residential. Mr. Lueck asked if there could be a design for residential with Crosstimbers coming through. Mr. Wood stated the homes could back up to Crosstimbers. Mr. Barfield said he would like for Mr. Sloan to talk with the neighbors before the Commission makes a decision since there is opposition. I Page 8 p & Z Minutes May 12, 1988 ( Ie I I I I PZ 88-6 DENIED I I I Ie I I I --' ,!~. I I I I I I [ Mr. Wood said he would agree to that. He said this request would create a 30 acre piece of property split by a street. He said Mr. Sloan could go to the neighbors and show what he plans to do, but he does not have a particular use at this time. Mr. Tricoli made the motion to deny PZ 88-6. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. Chairman Tucker stated he understands the concerns of the neighbors who bought their property in this nice subdivision with the idea of agriculture in the back of them. The motion to deny carried 6-1 with Mr. Barfield voting against denial. Mr. Wood stated he wanted to say something about the second case on the agenda. He said he was concerned with the contiguous parcel. He said he believes the 2 acre requirement be a singular piece of land. . Wood stated this property was s 1t by a road. He said the 2 a requirement is to control spot lng. Mr. Wood is concerned tha e Commission may have made a make. Mr. · Royston stated the Commission did not create spot zoning. He said contiguous zoning can cross a street. Mr. Stembridge came forward. He stated he feels the 2 acre requirement is not good. Mr. Lueck said maybe this could be addressed in the new proposed zoning ordinance. Mr. Wood asked why this property was singled out. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I ORDINANCE NO. 1553 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-6 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to C-l, R-8, and R-3. C-l ZONING BEING a tract of land out of the Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399 in Tarrant County, Texas, and being a part of the same tract of land recorded in Volume 2072, Page 528, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin in the South line of Bursey Road (County Road #4093), said iron pin is 30 feet South and 1475.43 feet West from the Northeast corner of said survey; THENCE South 00 degrees 06 minutes 11 seconds East 251.34 feet; THENCE East 198.74 feet; THENCE North 00 degrees 23 minutes 25 seconds West 250.00 feet to a point in the South line of Bursey Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 41 minutes 57 seconds East along said Bursey Road, 200.0 feet to the place of beginning and containing 1.14 acres of land, more or less. R-8 ZONING BEING a tract of land out of the Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399 in Tarrant County, Texas, and being a part of the same tract of land recorded in Volume 2072, Page 528, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being described as follows: COMMENCING at an iron pin in the South line of Bursey Road (County Road 84093), said iron pin is 30 feet South and 1475.43 feet West from the Northeast corner of said survey; THENCE South 00 degrees 06 minutes 11 seconds East 251.34 feet to the place. of beginning of tract being described: I I . e I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I- I Page 2 THENCE South 00 degrees 06 minutes 11 seconds East 402.66 feet; THENCE South 89 degrees 53 minutes 49 seconds West 396.62 feet; THENCE North 08 degrees 51 minutes 20 seconds West 408.23 feet; THENCE East 458.74 feet to the place of beginning and containing 3.96 acres of land, more or less. R-3 ZONING BEING a tract of land out of the Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399 in Tarrant County, Texas, and being a part of the same tract of land recorded in Volume 2072, Page 528, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being described as follows: COMMENCING at an iron pin in the South line of Bursey Road (County Road #4093), said iron pin is 30 feet South and 1475.43 feet West from the Northeast corner of said survey; THENCE South 00 degrees 06 minutes 11 seconds East 653.7 feet to the place of beginning of tract being described: THENCE South 00 degrees 06 minutes 11 seconds East 270.00 feet; THENCE South 87 degrees 48 minutes 04 seconds West 353.30 feet; THENCE North 08 degrees 51 minutes 20 seconds West 286.25 feet; THENCE North 89 degrees 53 minutes 49 seconds West 396.62 feet to the place of beginning and containing 2.38 acres of land, more or less. This property is located south of Bursey Road, east of Rufe Snow Drive, and west of Western Oaks Addition. -~ DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1988. PLANNING ~~ SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 3 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-88-6 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF - 1989. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY · /' - '- ,J . I· CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I .. Department: I -SUbject: Economic Development 2/13/89 Council Meeting Date: Public Appeal Hearing on Request of J.B. Johnston for PZ 88-21 Agenda Number: Rezoning of Lots lR and 2R, Block 6, Meadow Lakes Addition from R-l to Q-I-PD. Ordinance No. 1591 I I On November 10, 1988, the Planning and Zoning Commission heard Zoning Application PZ 88-21, a request of J.B. Johnston for rezoning Lots lR and 2R, Block 6, Meadow Lakes Addition from R-1 Single Family Residential to 0-1 PD Office District Planned Unit Development. I I The property is located on the southwest corner of Rufe Snow at Meadow Lakes Drive. The Planning and Zoning Commission denied the application. The applicant's request for an Appeal Hearing was authorized for January 9, 1989, by the City Council. I On December 30, 1988, the Staff was presented with a petition in opposition to Zoning Application PZ 88-21. The petition contained sixteen names of persons residing within two hundred feet of the subject property representing thirteen properties. These properties do meet the twenty percent criteria for a legal petition; therefore, an affirmative-Vote of 3/4 City Council members will be required by State Law for approval. I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 88-21 be I. denied · The applicant.requested an appeal hearing on the denial by Planning and Zoning I Commission. The appeal hearing was to be heard by City Council on January 9, 1989, however, the applicant submitted a letter requesting a postponement until February 13, 1989. I I I RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should hold the required Public Hearing and act on the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. I I I I- I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ?J Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available f¿ 11~ nt Head Signature City anager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of I· I I I I 1-2 1194 I I R-7-MF ~ ~t-~ C-2 1450 C-2 Ie C-2 C-2 "64 Ipo 1144 -------~ I· I. I I I I I I I 1ft I I I I I I I. I I . . ( ( January 9, 1989 Page 2 r Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the minutes of the December 12, 1988 meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Davis advised th minutes stated Mayor Brown ca11ed the meeting to order and it should b Mayor Pro Tern Davis. Motion to approve the minutes as corrected carried 6-0. 6. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSEN Mayor ~ro Tern Davis removed Item No. . ) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (8, 13, ,15, 16, 18, 19, 20, , 23, 24, 25, 26, & 27) APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Dav· Consent Agenda seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the * 8. PZ 88-6 REQUEST OF AMERICITY CORP. FOR APPEAL HEARING GRANTED . 9. PZ 88-21 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING _ REQUEST OF J.B. JOHNSTON TO REZONE LOTS 1R AND 2R, BLOCK 6, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION FROM R-l (SINGLE FAMILY) TO 0-I-PD (OFFICE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) POSTPONED 10. ORDINANCE NO. 1589 POSTPONED . ~ - ,- ,~! , 11. , PZ 88-22 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TO REZONE TRACT 1828, J. CONDRA, SURVEY, ABSTRACT 310, F AG (AGRICULTURE) TO U (INSTITUTION (lOCATED AT 7301 BURSEY ROA Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing alled for anyone wishing to speak in fa~or of this request to se come forward. Mr. George Tucker, Dire of Planning and Zoning and representing North ed before the Council. Mr. Tuc tated this property was where the Senior Citizens Center was 10 · Mr. Tucker stated the reason for this hearing was to give the tizens an opportunity to speak. 1-' Ie I I I I I I I I- I I II I I I I. I I ( ~ November 28, 1988 Page 2 6. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK . (7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15, 16, 18 , 19 & 20) APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 5-0. * 7. PZ 88-21 REQUEST OF J.B. JOHNSTON FOR AN APPEAL HEARING * B. PS 88-25 REQUEST OF TOMMY A. WALLING FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, WALLING ADDITION (LOCATED ON WEST SIDE OF CLIFT STREET) APPROVED * 9. GN 88-108 INCREASED VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTION TO THE PARK AND LIBRARY FUND APPROVED ~ *10. GN 88-109 AMENDING A PORTION OF ORDI NCE NO. 1480 REGARDING CABLE TELEVISIO OARD- ORDINANCE NO. 1 APPROVED 1 . GN 88-110 OR NANCE NO. 1578 (GIVING CREDIT ON AS SSMENT ORDINANCE NO. 1511) PROVED .', --...". Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked t abstain on voting on this item because of a conflict of interest. 'Ma r Pro Tem Davis left the Council table. Councilman Garvin mov ,seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No. 1578. returned to the Council table. 12. GN 88-111 APPOINTMENTS TO THE CABLE TELEVISION BOARD APPROVED ayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to appoint Roger Olson to Place 1 and Wayne Moody to Place 3 on the Cable Television Board. I' Ie I Page 5 P & Z Minutes November 10, 1988 ( 1 1 1 I I 1- 1_ I 4. PZ 88-21 I I . ,- ---.~" I I I 1 I- I ( Mr. Long said they would consider having 1800 square foot houses wes the proposed Bursey and south 0 Bursey and have the other as Mr. Wood asked if havin subdivision 1800 squ cause a problem. whole would they would like to have and 1700 square foot houses, could live with 1800. hairman Schwinger called for anyone else wishing to speak to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 88-20 with the stipulation that the . house size be 1800 square feet over the entire area. This motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the motion carried 7-0. Request of J. B. Johnston to rezone Lots 1R & 2R, Block 6, Meadow Lakes Addition, from its present " classification of R-1 Single Family to ·Q-1-PD Office-Planned ¡Development. , This property is located on the west side of Rufe Snow Drive at Meadow Lakes Drive. Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Bob Frank came forward to represent Mr. Johnston. He s'aid they are asking for Planned Development for an office building with a residential design. Mr. Wood said the homeowners do not want any Commercial there. He said the size of the building is very large, 8,000 square' foot structure. .. I Page 6 P & Z Minutes November 10, 1988 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I !I I I I- I ( ( Mr. Wood stated if the building were smaller, it might be more agreeable. Mr. Greene asked if they can make this project work. Mr. Frank said they hope to. George Tucker suggested the Chairman explain what Planned Development means. Chairman Schwinger read from the Zoning Ordinance about Planned Development. Pat Tucker, 4913 Lake Side Circle, came forward. She asked if this Planned Development would be spot zoning. George Tucker said it would not be. Chairman Schwinger said it would be screened. Pat Tucker said the lots could have been incorporated into the residential area. ~ ,~! Mr. Bowen said they came in previously for Local Retail and Mr. Bowen said at that time that he would not be in favor of it going any further south, and as long as he is on this Commission it will not happen. Mr. Bowen stated Planned Development would not make it spot zoning. He said it is an appropriate style for the area. George Tucker called for a point of order. He said they need to get back to those speaking for and then those in opposition. Chairman Schwinger called for anyone else wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. .~ I' Page 7 ( P & Z Minutes Ie November 10, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I ( There being no one wishing to speak in favor of this request, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Ronald Olman, 6513 Meadow Lakes Court, came forward. He stated he had contacted each of the property owners and have a petition for the City Council. He said he had bought into residential and would like these lots to stay residential. Mr. Olman said they say they can not sell these lots as residential, but lots can sell in Parkridge Estates down the street. Pat Tucker came forward again. She said she has been here about 10 times for zonings in Meadow Lakes since she bought in 1980. She said she feels there is enough businesses on the north side of the loop on Rufe Snow. Ms. Tucker said if something happened and this is not built, it could go bankrupt and the grass would grow up and look bad. Vernon Landrum, 4916 Delta Court, came forward. He said he is number one going into Meadow Lakes. Mr. Landrum stated he doesn't have any real objection to this except for the fence. lighting, and entrances. He said he is not speaking for or against, but he is speaking for a change in the plan. Mr. Bowen said the Zoning Ordinance requires certain lighting. George Tucker said with Planned Development, the Commission can stipulate what they want. Mr. Landrum said he has a large pool and he is concerned about the lighting and the fence. He said he doesn't want anyone jumping over the fence into his yard. ~ I- Page 8 p & Z Minutes November 10, 1988 I. I I I I I I I 1_ I I I I I I I I- I ( ( George Michero, 6701 Karen Drive, came forward. He said he lives directly across the street. He said he has owned his property for 23 years. He said he remembers when Rufe Snow was a two lane country road and he knows the changes that have been made. Mr. Michero said if the Commission opens this to businesses, all the rest will have the right to it, too. He said he 1s against this request; he does not want south of 820 to be like the north of 820. Terry Tice, 6701 La Rue Circle, came forward. He stated he lives directly across the street from the property in question. He said he agrees with Mr. Michero. He said the traffic is bad. Mr. Tice said 60% of the time he can not get out of his drive. He said the traffic light completely closes that drive now. Mr. Tice said in two years when these Commission members are no longer on the Board, other houses will expect to go Commercial. He said there are houses down the street for sale now. ,~ Dennis Tucker, 4913 Lake Side Circle, came forward. He said as developers they are not going to live there like he is. Mr. Tucker said Planned Development is a good control, but after it is built, what then; what control would we have. He said if it is changed, it will start deteriorating. Mr. Landrum asked what the present zoning is. Mrs. Calvert said it is R-1. Mr. Frank said he sent letters to all the property owners stating what he plans to do, but got no response. He said they are not locked in concrete, but don't believe they will be able to sell houses on Rufe Snow. I I. I I I I I I I 1_ I I I I I I I I- I Page 9 p & Z Minutes November 10, 1988 PZ 88-21 DENIED ADJOURNMENT ( ( Chairman Schwinger called for anyone else wishing to speak to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood said he remembers when this property was platted. He said the Commission tried to get Mr. Johnston to include these lots into the residential cuI de sac, but he said he did not want to; then he puts up that fence and then comes in with a Commercial request. Mr. Wood said this Commission made a promise to the homeowners there would be no Commercial down the street. He said this is a good plan, but we have to consider the homeowners. Mr. Wood said there are going to be times when some land can't be developed. He said he will not be in favor of Commercial here or down the street. J. B. Johnston tried to speak from the audience. Chairman Schwinger stated the Public Hearing was closed. .~. Mr. Bowen stated he may not always be on the Commission, but as long as he is here, he will not be in favor of Commercial down the street. Mr. Greene made the motion to deny PZ 88-21. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion to deny carried 7-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:40 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission . Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission .- I- I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas October 21, 1988 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 88-21 REVIEY LETTER, ZONING FROM R-I TO O-l-PD REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 120 Ye have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. To accelerate the zoning review process, we would recommend that a vicinity map, scale of the drawing, north arrow and a metes and bounds description of boundary of the proposed site be shown on all future zoning request submittals. "--' '.~- ~~~~ ~~ SUSAN L. SCHYINGER, G.C.E. SLS/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic Development Director Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning Zoning Review ...~ PZ 88-21 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 .. I' I. I I I I I 1« I I_ I. : I " I... . . , 1- . , I I I" It I -, " I : -. ~ ( TO: City Council City of North Richland Hills ez CASE NO. 88 -- :J../ ( .If Þ"V6 ~ ntJ '?r1. )t7P9 DATE: M>J_-fj ? J / l ~~J <- TIME: l -:;,' :z.; ¡ , J We, the undersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hills, living within 200 feet of the subject property, hereby object to the rezoning of said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would not be conductive to the public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. //-..... , ",,- DATE: ADDRESS: ~ ........, - ?-~? ~ f- 83 /I-J'-.v'? ,/ . '. ....~ ,~.. .... - '. , . ..~ / I- I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I t. City Counci 1 oí~ Nc)rth Ri ch 1 ancl IIi 11 s January 4, 1989 .... .- Dear Courlci.lr(jernbers: ~... \ This letter is to clarify the events concerning the zoning change req\.les"ted for property at Meadowlakes Drive and Rufe Snow Drive owned by Mr. J. B. Johnston and myself. The case number is PZ 88-21. .. The Planning and Zoning Commission gave the following reasons for derlying the zoning req11est: a. Mr. Johnston was advised by Mr. Wood, at the P & Z meeting in 1984, not to face lots to Rufe Snow Drive. b. The residents were promised that this would not be zoned commercial. Tt'1ese staternerlts ¡(ja.y ha.ve beer) rnade, blJt, tJ.'1ey were not Tnade at the time of platting, but most likely at tþe first attempt to. zoné the property commercial in 1986 I have included copies~ __Qf the TClint.ltes of the Tneetirl~S for YOtlr review. Furthermore, the original plan for this property gig call for three cul-de-sacs with lots backing up to Rufe Snow Drive. We were advised that this would be very djfficult to have approved because it would require a change from R-l to R-2 zoning. Therefore, the decision was made to go with two cul-de-sacs and face two lots to Rufe Snow Drive in order to comply with the currerJt zonirJg. As it turrJcd out, SOTne of- ·these lots are as much as 17,000 squar~ feet in size, and adding the two lots now facing Rufe Snow to tl'lese lots WOllld 1'1ave made them as lauch as 30,000 square feet in size. This was not economically feasible. We feel that our plan is the best possible use for the property. It provides a btlildirlgthat is residential in design and will be compatible with the surrounding properties. The traffic generated will be minimal. Peak traffic p~riods for proffesional office use will be at 8:45 a.m. and 5:00 P.~. While traffic at this intersection is busy at times, it is not so during these two periods. "1 .-'.- I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I Mr. Johnston is a resident of Meadowlakes and is as concerned as anyone in maintaining the high standards already established here. I have been involved with this subdivision for nine years and will be for several more. I am proud of what we have been able to accomplish and would not want to see anything at the entrance that would be detrimental. I do not believe that it is possible to sell homes at this location. Anything built here would have to be rental property. I do not believe thi$ would serve the neighborhood well. I would appreciate your taking an objective look at our request. I- ~ . ... b - .... ( ( P & Z Minutes December 13, 1984 I_ I I Mr. Wheeler stated there was an error made when the lines were drawn on t zoning map for the church zoning. e said since it had been so long nce the error was made, the City aff felt it should be done as a oning change. I I Acting Chairman Bowe called for those wishing to speak i opposition to this request to pleas come forward.~ to speak, the Public I There being the Actin Hearing I I PZ 84-89 APPROVED Mr. chwinger made the motion to rove PZ 84-89 as requested. This otion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 3-0. 2. PS 84-78 Request of Stephen Hinkle for preliminary plat of Lot 4, Block 4, Hewitt Estates. 1_ I PS 84-78 APPROVED Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 84-78 subject to the engineer's letter. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 3-0. I 3. Request of Stephen Hinkle for final plat of Lot 4, Block 4, Hewitt Estates. I I PS 84-79 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 84-79. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 3-0. I 4. PS 84-106 Request of Johnston & Sons, Inc. for preliminary plat of Block 6, Meadow Lakes Addition. I Acting Chairman Bowen asked if there was anyone present to represent this request. I Ie No one came forward. I I .~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I l' dg~ J P & Z Minutes December 13, 1984 ( PS 84-106 APPROVED 5. PS 84-109 PS 84-109 APPROVED 6. PZ 84-82 POSTPONED 7. PZ 84-83 .-..-- ( Acting Chairman Bowen stated there were problems with the street names. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 84-106 subject to the Engineer's letter and also subject to changing the names of the streets. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 3-0. Request of Charles Owen Companies for preliminary plat of Lots lR & 2, Block 33, College Hill Addition. Ms. Nash made the motion to app PS 84-109 subject to the Engi errs comments. This motion was conded by Mr. Schwinger and the mot· on carried 3-0. Request ins Investments, Inc. to rezone t of Lot 1, Lot 2 & 3, and part 0 ot 4, Richland Oaks Addition, f m their present classific ion of R-1 (Single Family Distri to C-l (Commercial Dist ct).. This property is located on he east side of Strummer Drive at edford-Euless Road. This request was postponed until the January 10th meeting. Request of Alan W. Hamm to rezone Tracts 9 & 9A, William Cox Survey, Abstract 321, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture District) to R-2 (Single Family District). This property is located on the south side of Starnes Road, approximately 550 feet west of Post Oak Drive. ..~ Acting Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. ~~~-'-"'II ~. l- Ie I J I I I I I I Ie I I I I II I I let I Page 4 p & Z Minutes February 28, 1985 ( PS 85-14 APPROVED 3. PS 84-66 PS 84-66 APPROVED 4. PS 85-15 PS 85-15 APPROVED 5. PS 85-17 ( Mr. Long said they had recently received a zoning change for this property for single family attached and they just had to move the 10 lines a little and split the 10 s. Mr. Tucker made the motion 0 approve PS 85-14. This motion w seconded by Ms. Nash and the motio carried 5-0. Request of Wayne W 1 Builder, Inc. for consideratio of revised preliminary pI of Briarwood Estates, 5th Filing. Mr. Woo~ade the motion to approve PS 84- '6. This motion was seconded by Ms. ash and the motion carried 5-0. equest of Wayne Wall Builder, Inc. for final plat of Briarwood Estates, 5th Filing. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 85-15. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Richland Hills Church of Christ for final plat of Blocks 7 & 8, Meadow Lakes Addition; Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PS 85-17 subject to the Engineer's comments and since the Commission approved the preliminary plat with the curve in the street, they would approve the final with the curve. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-1 with Chairman Bowen voting against. 6. PS 85-19 Request of J. B. Johnston for final plat of Block 6, Meadow Lakes Addition. ~lr . Johnston came forward. ~ ~ I- . Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I e I I Page 5 P & Z Minutes February 28, 1985 PS 85-19 APPROVED ADJOURNMENT ( ( Mr. Wood asked Mr. Johnston if he owned this property. Mr. Johnston stated he did. Mr. Wood asked who he bought it from. Mr. Johnston said he bought it from the developer of Meadow Lakes Addition. Mr. Wood said he felt the strip was owned by the Homeowners Association. He said it appears to be common area and if so, it was given to the homeowners of Meadow Lakes Additiqn. Mr. Johnson said only the entrance itself was donated to the homeowners. Chairman Bowen stated even though there may be a question of ownership, this Commission must go with what is shown on the plat and that is Mr. Johnston. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PS 85-19. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Wood voting against. The meeting adjourned at 8:05 P. M. Chairman Planning _ LQ~lng Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I- Ie I I 1 I I I 1 Ie I I I I I o r I ~z~~ ~~~fi ~2Q~ I ~~E~ ~2~pe . I ~~~g Irrz (J) (f) "HI) N' -... QD-... ::0 ...."1 C )( n > -1 I ~ ~ t') ~ ~ } z '.; ~ ~ ~i~ ~,.' ~ '.. þo -;.: ~ª~~ ..: - ~.~, = ~ ;.~ -¡ 19\: ~ :;0. ~ i: ~ ~ o ~ ~ 'C n o c; ::I n \. . n :a ::I Þ a~ [~ J; t"'I'C -< -C') :~.~ -=:..... ~~ 2 H ~ ;¡ ~ ï;~ ;.. ~ :~~~ ~~ ~ i';,;.'''' Jr ~ : '" ~ ¡ ~j =.1 -;~.' :: ".A' ~ " ..~ ; jªi1 n :i~i ~ if~! ; ~-;O~ ~ ~: l~ ..... ("'\ .01· '9 .. ~ ~ ~~:~ " ~ C ~ " ,'. ~ ¥,\J.:~~ itt-'.!:;'" ~~; ~ :- I' ~4~', I ~ ~ ~ . ... W' ,. C ..j ;.t~-.. ~~i ~ ~... ~i~_ '" ~. ~ Þ · ;:)...... ;a;V" .\ ~.2~ 6 ',;,\ ~ ~ ~ . It.' '~~ . ,.; ~';''',¿ ,. .; -; 1~ : ~, ~.... ... ::7 .~ ~;.~ ""- j~; ~-! \ . , \A :...¡ . CII "1 ~ ~ 0 0 CD J: r XJ 0 z ~ -] M n ~ . CJ ~ ~ .: en ~ ? '" ...... ... ø' , '" ': XJ (/) I 1] I -... ¡~ ~ Fil > ..... "1 ,. I" I 0 (/) ,. I , ~ ::c / ~ .... 0 I~ , fT1 '~ CJ I .(.) 0 ~ CD c: V1 'e :0 I; I§ :> r- r- N a z H Z (;) ..... U) ;0 I ~ (, ./' ~ .~ ~ ¡; ~ "'1 ,~ ~~ .....~. :; f'. CJ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ -1 ''1 >rT1 -1" ", (I) )0- r ", w ~ .. t- ~ " . o N · ,00 00' S 00· "''l.7- E ' - 102 00' '_._ _~.o~ r - ~o;-;;,iUñ Ü¡'[i;fN " \ I ~ ~~ \ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. r~ i ~ \~~:\ : i L-J ~ ~:~ ~ :;~~:; < .......0. ", . . .. ·'..,·....0 ... ww - ... .N ": ,,/ ,. , / I I b ~ I~ , ... --------':-- I I / I t- o ~ .. --- I :1 "J :t fT1 > o o L r > ~ fT1 en c- ::c' H < fT1 .,. ..... ~ ~ . .. III \A ", UI U) .. ~ ~ ... IV . '" . w :u UI .. UI ..., ", ~ :c r G) L o z m (/) rv XJ o a u 0 00' lag OQ' .. Oo·)Õ'U· .. '0,00 · IJ I I- I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I ~~ I ,... " I~ " ~ \., :'~ ~ ~ I ~ f\1~A.PO~~~5_P~ ~~~~~~~ - < 0 :..J )J..... ...1 trill ¡ I ~ ~ ,~ ~~I, ~ z:¿: I ~ II H f ~ ~ . ~ 1)- - l^ II ~ I " ¡,\ t:r , J ,... ~ "~I V' :~ ~:r~ ~l11w ~ R~~~t ~ q~ji(àc ~ ,.~ .:~(fI ~ )~ ;' ~ ~ . :1~ a t~ ~~ if ~ , / ì J-;^ ..) ~. ~J /~""""l\ ' ~~_J\ ~2" J J ~1 r~~ \. ' ¡"') - . If' ~ ~. ~ . í Ie I I I I I I I \1_ i I I I I I I I_ I I ORDINANCE NO. 1591 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-21 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-l to 0-I-PD. BEING Lots lR and 2R, Block 6, Meadow Lakes Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-192, Page 21, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located on the southwest corner of Rufe Snow Drive at Meadow Lakes Drive. DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITSSION THIS Oth DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1988. , .~ SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY tTHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-88-21 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY ~ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department- Pub 1 i c Works _ - Set Date for Public ~ubject: Ordinance No. 1594 I I ~ ~ C 'I M . D 2/13/89 Hea r1 ng on g,n i th fie 1 d Rd~ ouncl eetlng ate: GN 89-11 Agenda Number: It is proposed that February 27, 1989 be set as the date for a Public Hearing on improvements on Smithfield Road from Turner Drive to John Autrey Road. The notices have been mailed to all property owners to insure that they were notified at least 14 days prior to the Public Hearing, following which the necessity to construct the improvements and levy assessments will be determined by adoption of ordinances. Recommendation: It is recommended that February 27, 1989 be established as the date for the Public Hearing on the necessity for improving Smithfield Road - Ordinance No. 1594. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM (¿~td~ , Finance Director ~, Page 1 of 1 ~ I I . _ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I :1 I_ I ORDINANCE NO. 1594 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ADOPTING ESTIMATES OF THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS AND AMOUNTS TO BE ASSESSED FOR IMPROVEMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING STREET: SMITHFIELD ROAD FROM TURNER DRIVE TO JOHN AUTREY ROAD IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING TO THE OWNERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY AND TO ALL OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO GIVE NOTICE OF SUCH HEARING; AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROLL THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOK OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDINANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE RECORDS OF THIS CITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, has heretofore ordered that each of the hereinafter described 'portions of streets, avenues and publJc places in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, be improved by raising, grading, filling, paving together with combined concrete curbs and gutters on proper grade and line where same are not already so constructed, together with storm sewers and drains and other necessary incidentals and appurtenances; all of said improvements to be constructed as and where shown on the Plans and in strict accordance with the Plans and Specifications therefor, and; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills has caused the City Engineer to prepare and fil~ estimates of the cost of such improvements and estimates of the amounts per front foot proposed to be assessed against abutting property and the owners therefore, and such estimates have been examined. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: I . Such estimates, be, and they are hereby, adopted and approved. I I . It is hereby found and determined that the cost of improvements on each portion of street, avenue and public place hereinafter described with the amount or amounts per front foot proposed to be assessed for such improvements against abutting property and the owners thereof, are as follows, to wit: (See attached chart) The estimated cost of the improvements on Smithfield Road from Turner Drive to John Autrey Road; the average amount per front foot to be assessed against abutting property and the owners thereof is (see attached schedule a.) I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I f I III. A hearing be given and held by and before the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,'Texas, to all owning or claiming any property abutting upon said portion of streets, avenues and public places, as well as to all owning or claiming any interest in any such property. Such hearing shall be given and held on the 27th day of February, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber in the City Hall in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas and the City Secretary is hereby directed to give notice of the time and place of such hearing and of other matters and facts in accordance with the terms and provisions of an Act passed at the First Called Session of the Fortieth Legislature of the State of Texas, and known as Chapter 106 of the Acts of said Session, now being shown as Article 1105b Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. Such notice shall be by advertisement inserted at least three times in the City's official newspaper published in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, the first publication to be made at least twenty-one (21) days before the date o'f said hearing. Said notice shall comply with and be in accordance with the terms and provisions of said Act. The City Secretary is further directed to give personal notice of the time and place of such hearing to all owners or other claiming any property abutting on said portions of streets, avenues and public places as well as to all owning or claiming any interest in any such property. Such personal notice shall be given by the City Secretary mailing said notice, at least fourteen (14) days before date of such hearing, postag~ prepaid, to the respective owners of record of the properties to be assessed, and to any person owning or claiming any interest in said properties, to the last known address of said owner or persons. It shall not be necessary for the City Secretary to mail said notice to any owner or other person claiming an interest in the property to be assessed when the address of such owner or other person is unknown to the City Secretary and cannot be determined by the City Secretary after reasonable investigation. In this connection, the City Secretary shall prepare and file with these proceedings a list of the properties to be assessed, the names of those persons owning or claiming any interest in said properties to whom the notice was mailed, together with the last known address of the respective owners and those persons owning or claiming an interest in said proper~y. The City Secretary shall certify that each'of the parties named in said list whose address was known was mailed a copy of the notice of hearing and shall further certify the date or dates on which said notice was mailed. A copy of the notice shall be attached to such certificate. The certificate of the City Secretary shall be conclusive evidence of the facts therein recited. Failure of the City Secretary to give notice of hearing by mail as herein provided for, or failure of the owners or other persons interested to receive said notice, shall in nowise invalidate said hearing or any assessments levied pursuant to said' hearing, but notice of hearing shall be sufficient, valid and binding upon all owning or claiming such abutting property to any interest therein when same shall have been given by newspaper advertisement as first hereinabove provided. Such notice shall describe in general terms the nature of the improvements for which assessments are proposed to be levied, the street or highways to be improved, the estimated amount per front foot proposed to be assessed, the estimated total cost of the improvements on each such street or highway, the time and place at which such hearing shall be held, and may consist of a copy of the published notice containing such information. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I IV. The City Secretary is hereby directed to engross and enroll this Ordinance by copying the caption of same in the Minute Book of the City Council and by filing the complete Ordinance in the appropriate Ordinance Records of this City. v. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th day of February, 1989. Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND lEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City ~.. I Ie I I I I NF 1. John Hum 1563 Terry I N.R.H., Texas 76180 I NF 3. Jenny Coleman I 13220 Erwin Van Nuys, Ca. 91401 I~ 4. David Melville ~ Rt. 1, Box 392-B Azle-, Texas 76020 I NF 5. Villiam R. Beasley 6917 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 II RF 6. Marguirete Morrow 7007 Smithfi~ld Rd. I N.R.H., Texas 76180 .-1 RF 7. Harguirete Morrow I 7007 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 I I NF 9. Rami ro M. Balero 3208 Denman Ft. Worth, Texas 76119 I NF 10. Texas American Bank P.O. Box 2050 Ie Ft. Vorth, Texas 76113 I SMITHFIELD ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas Design ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L February 7, 1989 Non-Res. USAGE NF NS NR RF RS RR VEST CREDIT TOT. ASS. C/G (NO SV.~ 7.15 60.08 7.15 33.62 7.15 24.79 5.01 22.65 5.01 13.84 5.01 10.89 UNIT NO. PROPERTY OYNER AND ADDRESS * * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION K ELL E R - S HIT H FIE L D ( Vest Side ) , John He Comas Survey Abst. 1040, Tr. 2A4 Vol. 7488, Pg. 2072 NF 2. Joe V. Tirk John Me Comas Survey 909 John McCain Abst. 1040, Tr. 2A3 Colleyville, Texas 76034 Vol. 5039, Pg. 83 RS 8. Hassan S. Ali 7833 Noneman N.R.H., Texas 76180 Villiam Cox Survey Abst. 321, Tr. 6A5 Vol. 7976, Pg. 1703 Villiam Cox Survey Abst. 321, Tr. 6Al Vol. 9256, Pg. 2319 Villiam Cox Survey Abst. 321, Tr. 6A Vol. 7733, Pg. 1768 Villiam Cox Survey Abst. 321, Tr. 6A2 Vol. 2817, 'Pg. 329 Briarwood Estates Tr. A, Block 3 Vol. 6735, Pg. 765 Briarwood Estates Lot 1, Block 1 Vol. 7755, Pg. 941 Briarwood Estates Lot 13, Block 1 Vol. 388-173, Pg. 84 Briarwood Estates Lot 12, Block 1 Vol. 8328, Pg. 441 ~: Residen. FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSHT. FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. R 0 A D 105.37 60.08 104.74 60.08 368.80 60.08 157.50 60.08 57.70 60.08 100.00 22.65 44.10 22.65 115.00 13.84 105.00 60.08 75.42 60.08 * * * $753.40 $5,577.23 $748.89 5,543.89 0.00 22,157.50 0.00 9,462.60 0.00 3,466.62 0.00 2,265.00 0.00 998.86 0.00 1,591.60 0.00 6,308.40 0.00 4,531.23 PAGE 1 OF 7 I Ie I I I I I I NF 12. V.H. Sutton P.O. Box 18793 Ft. Vorth, Texas 76118 I NF 13. Quadrangle Dev. Co. Century Oaks Addn. 2275 Vestpark Ct. II #202 Lot 30, Block 4 Euless, Texas 76040 Vol. 388-176, Pg. 50 I~F 14. Quadrangle Dev. Co. Century Oaks Addn. 2275 Vestpark Ct. II 1202 Lot 31, Block 4 I Euless, Texas 76040 Vol. 388-176, Pg. 50 NF 15. Quadrangle Dev. Co. Century Oaks Addn. 2275 Vestpark Ct. II 1202 Lot 32, Block 4 I Euless, Texas 76040 Vol. 388-176, Pg. 50 I I NF 17. FDIC-Quail Prop. P.O. Box 802090 Dallas, Texas 75380 I RS 18. Michael Losat, Jr. P.O. Box 80042 II N.R.H., Texas 76180 RS 19. Virginia Rankin Kingswood Estates 7721 Cedar Park Ave. Lot 12, Block 2 II Ft. Vorth, Texas 76180 Vol. 7460, Pg. 2060 Ie I SMITHFIELD ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas Design ASS E S SHE N T February 7, 1989 R 0 L L UNIT NO. PROPERTY OVNER AND ADDRESS * * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION K ELL E R · S HIT H FIE L D ( Vest Side ) RF 11. Delbert V. Veston 7117 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 NF 16. Century Jt. Venture c/o William Pasteur 2275 Vestpark Ct. 1202 Euless, Texas 76040 Briarwood Estates Lot 11, Block 1 Vol. 7542, Pg. 441 Briarwood Estates Lot 16, Block 2 Vol. 9218, Pg. 1539 Villiam Cox Survey Abs t. 321, Tr. 5 \ Vol. 6699, Pg. 448 Villiam D. Barnes Survey Abst. 146, Tr. lAl Vol. 8801, Pg. 1661 Kingswood Estates Lot 1, Block 3 Vol. 7129, Pg. 1142 .. FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSHT. FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. R 0 A D 80.00 22.65 145.20 60.08 89.34 60.08 70.00 60.08 70.00 60.08 1035.88 60.08 544.87 60.08 127.90 13.84 125.80 13.84 * * * 0.00 $1,812.00 0.00 8,723.62 0.00 5,367.55 0.00 4,205.60 0.00 4,205.60 0.00 62,235.67 0.00 32,735.79 0.00 1,770.14 0.00 1,741.07 PAGE 2 OF 7 I Ie I I I I I IRS 21. David R. Villiams 7721 Evergreen Ave. N.R.H., Texas 76180 IRS 22. George Vegas 7720 John Autry N.R.H., Texas 76180 Ie I NF 23. Onward, Inc. 13220 Erwin Van Nuys, Ca. 91401 I NF 24. Doyle E. Morrison 106 N. Clark I Comanche, Texas 7644~ RF 25. Eddie E. Velborn 7004 Smithfield Rd. I I N.R.H., Texas 76180 I RF 27. Mark Harper II 7012 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 I Ie I SMITHFIELD ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas Design ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L February 7, 1989 Non-Res. Residen. USAGE NF NS NR RF RS RR EAST CREDIT TOT. ASS. CIG (V/SVLK) 7,. 15 68 . 88 7.15 42.42 7.15 33.59 5.01 28.81 5.01 20.00 5.01 17.05 UNIT NO. PROPERTY OWER AND ADDRESS * * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION K ELL E R · S HIT H FIE L D ( Vest Side ) RS 20. Elmer Ray Cox, Jr. 7720 Evergreen Ave. N.R.H., Texas 76180 * * * Kingswood Estates Lot 1, Block 2 Vol. 6086, Pg. 268 Kingswood Estates Lot 12, Block 1 Vol. 8099, Pg. 421 Kingswood Estates Lot 1, Block 1 Vol. 8588, Pg. 968 K ELL E R - S HIT H FIE L D ( East Side ) RF 26. Curtis L. Fletcher 7008 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 Eliza Cross Survey Abst. 281, Tr. lAl Vol. 8415, Pg. 567 Smithfield Acres Lot 11, Block 1 Vol. 6545, Pg. 994 Smithfield Acres Lot 10, Block 1 Vol. 6094, Pg. 551 Smithfield Acres Lot 9, Block 1 Vol. 7598, Pg. ì66 Smithfield Acres Lot 8, Block 1 Vol. 8737, Pg. 1602 FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSHT. FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. R 0 A D 125.80 125.80 125.80 R 0 A D * * * 13.84 13.84 13.84 * * * 189.00 68.88 64.00 68.88 63.90 28.81 63.90 28.81 63.90 28.81 0.00 1,741.07 0.00 1,741.07 0.00 1,741.07 0.00 13,018.32 0.00 4,408.32 0.00 1,840.96 0.00 1,840.96 0.00 1,840.96 ~',. PAGE 3 OF 7 I Ie I I I I I I RF 29. Kelly R. Beebe 7020 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 I RF 30. Tom V. Carlson 7024 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 I-F 31. The Odore C. Falls 7028 Smithfield Rd. I N.R.H., Texas 76180 RF 32. Susan Dunn 7032 Smithfield Rd. I N.R.H., Texas 76180 I NF 34. James S. Osborhn I 14709 Tanglewood Ln. Farmers Branch, Tx 75023 I RF 35. John V. Sims 7100 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 I RF 36. Katrina L. Johnson 7104 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 I Ie I SMITHFIELD ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas Design ASS E SSM E N T February 7, 1989 R 0 L L UNIT NO. PROPERTY OWER AND ADDRESS * * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION K ELL E R - S HIT H FIE L D ( East Side ) RF 28. Don E. Cockroft 7016 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 RF 33. Allen G. Vallace 7036 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 -. ~ Smithfield Acres Lot 7, Block 1 Vol. 8765, Pg. 2151 Smithfield Acres Lot 6, Block 1 Vol. 7911, Pg. 1833 Smithfield Acres Lot 5, Block 1 Vol. 7869, Pg. 2132 Smithfield Acres Lot 4, Block 1 Vol. 6780, Pg. 673 Smithfield Acres Lot 3, Block 1 Vol. 8936, Pg. 2241 Smithfield Acres Lot 2, Block 1 Vol. 7258, Pg. 1999 Smithfield Acres Lot 1, Block 1 Vol. 5751, ,Pg. 271 Smithfield Acres Lot 8, Block 2 Vol. 9002, Pg. 1775 Smithfield Acres Lot 7, Block 2 Vol. 7248, Pg. 1832 FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSMT. FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. R 0 A D 63.90 28.81 63.90 28.81 63.90 28.81 63.90 28.81 63.90 28.81 63.90 28.81 63.90 68.88 62.62 28.81 62.00 28.81 * * * 320.14 1,520.82 320.14 1,520.82 320.14 1,520.82 320.14 1,520.82 320.14 1,520.82 320.14 1,520.82 456.88 3,944.55 313.73 1,490.36 310.62 1,475.60 " PAGE 4 OF 7 I Ie I I I I I I RF 38. Rueben P. Higgs 7112 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 I RF 39. Rodolfo Garcia 7116 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 SMITHFIELD ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas Design ASS E SSM E N T February 7, 1989 R 0 L L UNIT NO. PROPERTY OVNER AND ADDRESS * * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION K ELL E R - S M I T H FIE L D ( East Side ) RF 37. Vilbur J. Stewart 7108 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 leF 40. Michael Spinks 7120 Smithfield Rd. N.R.H., Texas 76180 I RF 41. Stephen Carter 7124 Smithfield Rd. I N.R.H., Texas 76180 I CV 43. Boat Club Estates, Inc. I 5300 Boat Club Rd. Ft. Yorth, Texas 76135 I CV 44. Boat Club Estates, Inc. 5300 Boat Club Rd. Ft. Yorth, Texas 76135 I CV 45. Boat Club Estates, Inc. 5300 Boat Club Rd. Ft. Yorth, Texas 76135 I CV 46. Boat Club Estates, Inc. ~ 5300 Boat Club Rd. I~ Ft. Worth, Texas 76135 I NF 42. Barney E. Calvert, Jr. 7516 Creekling Dulu th, Ga. 30 136 ~-" ':3 Smithfield Acres Lot 6, Block 2 Vol. 5786, Pg. 378 Smithfield Acres Lot 5, Block 2 Vol. 5082, Pg. 587 Smithfield Acres Lot 4, Block 2 Vol. 6940, Pg. 809 Smithfield Acres Lot 3, Block 2 Vol. 5174, Pg. 865 Smithfield Acres Lot 2, Block 2 Vol. 8793, Pg. 1253 Smithfield Acres Lot 1, Block 1 Vol. 7042, Pg. 2102 Coventry Place Estates Lot 16Rl, Block 5 Vol. 8979,Pg. 1626 Coventry Place Estates Lot 15R1, Block 5 Vol. 8979, Pg. 1626 Coventry Place Estates Lot 14Rl, Block 5 Vol. 8979, Pg. 1626 Coventry Place Estates Lot 13Rl, Block 5 Vol. 897J, Pg. 1626 ~: FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSHT. FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. R 0 A D * * * 62.00 28.81 0.00 1,786.22 62.00 28.81 0.00 1,786.22 62.00 28.81 310.62 1,475.60 62.00 28.81 310.62 1,475.60 62.00 28.81 310.62 1,475.60 62.00 68.88 443.30 3,827.26 87.35 60.00 5,241.00 0.00 70.00 60.00 4,200.00 0.00 70.00 60.00 4,200.00 0.00 95.59 60.00 5,735.40 0.00 PAGE 5 OF 7 I Ie I I I I CV 47. Boat Club Estates, Inc. 5300 Boat Club Rd. I Ft. Vorth, Texas 76135 I CV 49. Boat Club Estates, Inc. I 5300 Boat Club Rd. Ft. Vorth, Texas 76135 SMITHFIELD ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas Design ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L UNIT NO. PROPERTY OWNER AND ADDRESS * * * February 7, 1989 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSHT. FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. K ELL E R - S M I T H FIE L D ( East Side ) R 0 A D CV 48. Boat Club Estates, Inc. 5300 Boat Club Rd. Ft. Worth, Texas 76135 I_V 50. Charles V. Beane Carl H. Nelson Lawrence"R. Lynd P.O. Box 18953 Ft. Worth, Texas 76118 I I I NF 52. Villiam Howard Long 7402 Smithfield Rd. ~ N.R.H., Texas 76180 I NF 53. Annie Brewer 2127 Primrose Ft. Yorth, Texas 76111 ! I NF 54. A.F. Jernigan 7608 Smithfield Rd. I N.R.H., Texas 76180 NS 55. Jimmie Y. Vest Rt. 2, Box 192 E I Bellview, Texas 76228 ~S 56. Rocky Turner I~ 7801 Redwood Ct. N.R.H., Texas 76180 I NF 51. Goode, Inc. P.O. Box 18793 N.R.H., Texas 76180 . Coventry Place Estates Lot 12Rl, Block 5 Vol. 8979, Pg. 1626 * 114.95 60.00, 6,897.00 Coventry Place Estates Lot 15Rl, Block 5 Vol. 8016, Pg. 1822 0.00 115.00 60.00 6,900.00 Coventry Place Estates Lot 17R, Block 2 Vol. 8016, Pg. 1822 0.00 128.60 60.00 7,716.00 Coventry Place Estates Trac t AR Vol. 8101, Pg. 1376 0.00 526.61 67.41 35,498.78 0.00 Villiam V. Barnes Survey Abs t . 146, Tr. ID Vol. 4706, Pg. 471 235.98 68.88 Villiam Y. Barnes Survey Abs t . 146, Tr. 1 Vol. 4713, Pg. 190 195.90 68.88 Villiam V. Barnes Survey Abs t . 146, ,Tr. lC Vol. 3150, Pg. 247 331.45 68.88 William w. Barnes Survey Abs t. 146, Tr. 2 Vol. 6675, Pg. 932 180.00 68.88 Crestwood Estates Lot 16, Block 9 Vol. 8458, Pg. 573 142.95 42.42 Crestwood Estates Lot 1, Block 9 Vol. 8987, Pg. 1492 t, 142.37 20.00 0.00 16,254.30 0.00 13,493.59 0.00 22,830.28 0.00 12,398.40 0.00 6,063.94 0.00 2,847.40 PAGE 6 OF 7 I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I .. SMITHFIELD ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS City of North Richland Hills, Texas Design ASS E SSM E N T R 0 L L February 7, 1989 UNIT NO. PROPERTY OVNER AND ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FRONT ASSESS APPARENT ASSESSHT. FOOTAGE RATE CREDITS LESS CR. * * * K ELL E R · S HIT H FIE L D R 0 A D * * * G RAN D TOT A L S 6,840.23 46.00 (AVG.) $314,622.54 ".- -... PAGE 7 OF 7 '- 1- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1 Department: _Ubject: I Library 2/13/89 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: GN 89-12 Project Partners Grant Application A new grant program, Project Partners, has been made available through the Texas State library and federal Library Services and Construction Act to provide up to $100,000 to link neighboring automated public libraries which are willing to share their resources and honor reciprocal borrowers cards. The librarians of North Richland Hills, Grapevine, Bedford, Euless and Watauga have been working to develop the grant application, which is due in Austin by March 15, 1989. The grant year is September 1, 1989 - August 31, 1990. The project will provide the capability for'a North Richland Hills patron to type an author, title, or subject into our on-line catalog terminal and, upon finding that the material he wants is not available, check to see if it is available at one of the Project Partner libraries. Dedicated phone lines or a local area network will connect all five IBM-36 computers to show immediate locations and availability. The patron will then pick up the telephone (similar to hotel phone in airports) at the on-line catalog, select the name of the library which owns the book and ask that it be held for him until he can pick it up at the lending library. His NRHPL1s borrower1s card will be honored at the lending library as if it was a resident card; no fees will be charged to any member library user. Materials will be returned by the patron to the lending library; overdue notices will be generated by the member li-brary and sent to the cardholder1s home library. We are working on programming that will allow any library access to the ~verdue files so that fines can be collected and posted at any of the Project Par~ner ~libraries. Details on procedures will be worked out by the consortium of library directors so that the distribution of fine monies will be equitable to all members. The initial cost encompassed in the grant request is (1) $11,535 for computer hardware and software; (2) $2,400 for telephone installation charges; and (3) $30,000 for programming to connect the search loop by author, title, subject access, ability to access overdue and fine records, provide security, screen changes and other programming details. The approval of this grant will have no impact on the 88/89 budget. The ongoing costs beginning in the 89/90 budget will be approximatley $3,600 per year for monthly telephone charges and a loss of approximately $1,500 per year in nonresidential fees. The availability of 220,000 additional materials to our patrons is considered an ' excellent trade-off. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct.'Number N/A Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~ff4dS Available Operating Budget __ ~ eOt~ ~¿ ß ~ _ -/ d~~~~ < Iff. lZ1~ Department Head Signature - City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Fenance Director Page 101 1 I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II 'I .~.. " Page Two Even though there will be some duplication among our collections, the demand patterns of our patrons will vary (i.e. all three school districts will not assign the same subjects during the same two week period, so when one library's resources arp depleted, the patron can go to a neighboring library). This year's output measures showed that 55% of our patrons who could not locate a book at our library still did not have that book (through inter-library loan or reserves) at the end of a thirty-day period. The nearby availability of the resources of the five neighboring libraries can provide a practical cost-effective means of sharing these materials. The Cities of Euless and Bedford have approved this grant. Approval by Watauga and Grapeviné is pending. The libraries of Fort Worth, Hurst and Haltom City are not included because they operate on systems that are not IBM and it would not be cost-effective to link at this time. The North Richland Hills library Board has been working on this project with the library staff and concurs with the recommended action. Recommendation: It is recommended that: 1) The City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the Project Neighbor Reciprocal Agreement and Project Partner Grant Application; 2) Nonresident fees be waived for members to that agreement contingent upon receipt of the Project Partners Grant; 3) Approval for the City of North Richland Hills to administer all funds relevant to Project Partners Grant. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I ~~ I_- I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I ",.- PROJECT NEIGHBOR RECIPROCAL AGREEMENT FOR THE PROJECT PARTNERS GRANT THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS agrees to extend to residents of the neighboring cities participating in the Project Partners grant, and future cities which may sign this agreement, the following library privileges, contingent upon the receipt and implementation of the Texas State Library Proj~ct ; Partners grant which would provide these services: 1. Online access to the collection of the North Richland Hills Public Li~rary from the Project Partner member libraries' public access'terminals. 2. Free check-out by Project Partner library residents of library materials which are normally available to resident patrons of the North Richland Hills Public Library. 3. Reciprocal borrowers' cards which can be used to check out materials at the other Project Partner Libraries, with adherence to the circulation policies of the lending library, effective September 1, 1989. 4. The capability for a patron from a Project Partner Library to determine the availability of a library material and place a reserve on that material from any Project Partner location. 5. Continuing support of the Project Partner program of resource sharing and reciprocal borrowing for at least five years beyond the grant year, which ends August 31, 1990. This support includes monthly telecommunica- tions costs to link Project Partner Libraries and the continuance of free reciprocal ca~ds and resource sharing policies to Project Partner member library residents. or r'--~ .. Signed this day of 1989. City Manager City of North Richland Hills ..~ I- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: eUbject: I Administration d 2/13/89 Council Meeting Date: Management Contract Addendum- Resolution No. 89-11 Agenda Number: GN 89-13 The attached resolution authorizes the Mayor to execute the referenced contract as was agreed upon at the January 10th, 1989 Executive Session. Recommendation: Approve the attached Resolution No. 89-11. e - /' ,- - '.! , Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget e Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~1t/~ Department Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director . . Page 1 of 1 I· I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I {' I RESOLUTION NO. 89-11 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The Mayor be and is hereby authorized to execute the attached addendum to the Management Contract as the act and deed of the City. PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th day of February, 1989. Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City ~. I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I ~ I STATE OF TEXAS ~ COUNTY OF TARRANT ~ ADDENDUM TO MANAGEMENT CONTRACT It is agreed between the parties that the Management Contract between Rodger N. Line and the City of North Richland Hills dated April 6, 1988 is amended by increasing the base pay in Paragraph One of Section 6 by the sum of $2,500.00 annually, effective February 15, 1989. Executed this the day of February, 1989. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS By: Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City ,. I I I I I I I I I 1- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 2/13/89 Agenda Number: GN 89-14 SUbject: Approve Speed Limit on Amundson Drive of 35 MPH - Ordlnance No. 1593 The Public Works and Police Departments are in agreement that the speed limit for Amundson Drive from Main Street to Precinct Line Road should be set at 35 mph. By State Law "Article XIX. Speed Restrictions, Section 166. paragraph 2.", the existing speed limit could be construed to be 60 mph due to the adjacent area not meeting the "urban district" definition as described by the State. The speed of traffic as periodically monitored by the Police Department has been in excess of 45 mph. Recommendation: The staff recommends the Council approve Ordinance No. 1593 for the general safety of the public. Finance Review Acct. Number N/A Sufficient Funds Available JJIr ~~ r~ City Manager , Finance Director ) t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 ~. >D~~~~~'- o. ~ -' ~8 .1 I c~' ~1iI-=l/1 n -R1i~~~M''- ~B - li~ .~ :~¡ "/~:-: =~ :~rÎT' =IfEft.~t8jE ~æ -+ f- "-"" - ,-J... '" 8¡~t -. ::=-iLCI "\n· , ~ I;; - - - ,'J1 ~ ", \ - .~ 9'" .. -=:-=I~ - _-= =:=:; r/.tJ -L §.~ " /~7:7 ,: ~:=E '::'. --=_ n-t -H ~ I::-'L'."~ '- ' H ¡'" --<F- ~ rnn ~--\\ T-~ ~-+---J lliLWJJ --, "" ~tþ':L ~~ ~I r-r~T"ì \ \ l~ I Æ~:A I 'Tl~! _. 1 ~/' ~ f-- ~ '''''. I ~ >:;'\ ; n , ' " =t= ........... ~. L··'·'....' 0 . tEIHHfB lc _~ I-_~ _ h.- >-__~;I a~r-.:f1- I I . t; ., 1 -:-"= ::=t::::~c±=: -HI --; n \ 11 T Tl "] ]IN ~ ~ !rl I~ _ ;--H1~~1 ~ ' ~.. <"'., +ï..;. ') co: 0 :!B~ ~~«~ I.c- BfJT\ {; ~ ,;5." ~, '.~ ~ rl r - :::::1 r:=Ei ~::::_ w] 1 Yrr1~fçJ .... 7 A ~ - - "" Yo ËÞ( I ~ t::t::3 ~~EJu7 r"f"'í""I'L :.œ: ~ L:L.J me ~~ -1 1;1- _ CROSS ~EL.J I LLL' W T j T\ ), -'Ci' l...L.J L.L.J -1 I": ~ ~ ~ II ¡I¡III T T7 ~ ' "'~~~ __~.ìl.Y- ul Iln HV All I I, ~~~ ~ _! ~ - II r. - i I í ,I T R~ ,% ' , ~ LLLJ : II IIIIII 1117 L IIII"II¡II I ì ~,W11Lll ~r-; ~//: \f..urrLt:=. t=J '- ~] T T ~ ~~~~//~ \ _l_\à [- ~ ' ~F- 11 ~1\Y~ '. 'I' j-- _!.-- ~ '''THFlEe SCHOOL [-~ T -r-~ \~~~~r:l - r-------,.... -'U 1 ç;:Q /~ø / . ~ II} r-- ~~ rì' -:;::;::;/ ! "" -1.U . , .....J h--v HO T TT b //: ·mÎfI::Ifð:'læ' i~~~~'GlE;~~'r--7'U~""·I~"~ '1Q ./ . I UilllIIIO~ H -J-.\-f->----{~::!t iW r-\ nn.mJ1IIIj ¡¿ 1_ II LIIITfrrTmi :..:::1.. ~--- ,}. ~g-,~~ =~mA'" ~ . " .==:0:: I r-:;. :L( _,N S' UDIIIIIIJ 1--t4 I ~~¡:::f-=1.~' ," IÙ v ,::{' llli íl - --LJ '0 I I I J/ ' ¡¡ 0 V[,.L't"" I : U1 T "--~_ '!T~T!mµ. Il:íi1" I" ~ l >-- >- ; 'U.'O. HI6H SCHOOL --F1t=R I-- r- - ¡.. r-- ~ I~( ~- _ ~i::= :,.~I ~fml. == 2I~~- ~~ >-- >-- _ . ~ --< ~~ _ >---- M .... >-- IV --< - r·---j~« >---- .., ~ h RT1 ~.~ . -- 8 - _,-01 .-1. ~L.i- I I_J~:_- ~ lit. I.ï== H ~J, ~:~ c¿-:~! LUI< l.WJJJJ I J L IT ~ 1= -;¡ ANf - cSJ I =~~ ~ 1_' _7) 1 ~~~~ == .~ L FI .,..'- I ~Rlrr i~ I , 12 l' ~,- ~ ~~'. ~ ,,~ ~. J.~ ~ ~I', Lc~ tt Ie I -- --- \\' 'I II IV ... I I - II 'b~·1 -, ... ... ~ ~ ... I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .' . QRDINANCE NO. 1593 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1 . There is hereby declared a 35 mile per hour maximum prima facie speed limit upon the public street in North Richland Hills, Texas known as Amundson Drive from its intersection with Main Street northeast parallel with the railroad right-of-way to its intersection with Eden Road and then east to its intersection with Precinct Line Road. 2. Any person operating a motor vehicle in violation of this Oidinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemearior and fined not in excess of $200.00. 3 . This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its date of passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of I 1989. APPROVED: Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance ubject: ~ 2/13/89 Council Meeting Date: Authorization of Advertising Sale of Revenue Bonds Agenda Number: GN 89-15 City Council action of January 9, 1989 authorized the sale of $2,000,000 of new revenue bonds. A sunmary of the projects involved was presented to the Council at that tllne and included here again as a review. It is requested that the Council take action at this tllne to pennit the staff to advertise the intention to sell $2,000,000 1989 Series Waterworks and Sewer Revenue Bonds. Since'revenue bonds are non-voter approved State law requires fo:r::mal action by the City Council authorizing this notice of intent to sell bonds. Reconmendation: It is reconmended that the City Council authorize the publishing of notice of intention to sell these $2,000,000 Waterworks and Sewer Bonds. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget . Other ~ ~ 7ll~_L.. ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM N/A . Fmance Director City Manager Page 10f 1 I I. I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I· I TABLE I CITY OF NORm RICHLAND HILLS 1989 to 1991 Revenue Bond Projects 1. Misc. Replacaœnt Fire Hydrant 2 . Utility Adjustments in Industrial Street Projects 3 . Smithfield Road 4 . Calloway Branch I 24" Sewer 5 . Calloway Branch II 21" Sewer 6 . Misc. Water Line Replacement $ 168,000 . Total 198,000 163,000 84,000 163,560 600,000 873,600 307,120 $2,557,250 7. Precinct I.Jine Water & Sewer 8 . Watauga Road - Sewer Water Wells - Golf Course Subtotal $ 425,000 150,000 $3,132,280 Davis Blvd . Utility Relocation Less amount funded from Operations AnDunt funded fran Unspecified Proposed Bond Sales $< 425,000> < 707,250> $2,000,000 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Inter 1 OCd 1 AgreelJlen l w i Lh Hd 1 Luu. City for Golf Course Project ~ 2/13/89 Council Meeting Date: GN 89-16 Agenda Number: Subject: A portion of the property donated to the City of North Richland Hills for the purpose of constructing a golf course lies within the corporate boundaries of the City of Haltom City. In addition, there is a small tract (approximately 18 acres) owned by the City of Haltom City which is leased to North Richland Hills for golf course purposes which is also in the Haltom City city limits. It would be unworkable for both cities to provide municipal services to different areas of the golf course (police, fire, ambulance, utilities, etc.); therefore, an Interlocal Agreement has been prepared under which Haltom City would agree that such services will be provided by the City of North Richland Hills. After some modifications were made to the originally prepared agreement, as indicated by the attached correspondence, the attached revised Interlocal Agreement is believed to be acceptable to Haltom City, and is on their agenda for City Council action on this date. If for some unexpected reason the attached proposed agreement is not approved by the Haltom City City Council, it will be returned to you for further consideration at a future date prior to being executed. Î The basic provisions of the proposed agreement have been discussed with the City Council . Ad Hoc Golf Course Construction Committee and it was found to be acceptable as revised and attached hereto. Ie Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Interlocal Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute it at the appropriate time on behalf of the City of North I Richland Hills.. I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Other I Finance Reviey¡ Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡:¿117~ Department Head Signature 'CI~ger CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 'of 1 I I . e I I I I' '. : . I I I -- --- I I I I I II I Ie I . I ~ City of ~orth 1lichland Hills ¡ I February 7, 1989 ¡ . {. . ~' Mr. Mike Groomer, City Manager City of Haltom City P.O. Box 14246 Haltom City, Texas 76117 Re: Interlocal Agreement Golf Course Project Dear Mike: This is in response to your letter dated December 28, 1988, outlining three changes i~ the subject Interlocal Agreement which your attorney and City Council have proposed be made. Attached hereto is a revised proposed Interlocal Agreement as rewritten to incorporate the first two changes, including an expanded description of the municipal functions to be covered and making provisions for renegotiation of the agreement if the golf course ceases to be operated by the City of North Richland Hills as a municipal course. These two proposed changes are acceptable and very appropriate. With regard to the proposal that Haltom City be comp.ensated for lost water and sewer revenue as well as possible lost tax revenues by giving Haltom City residents the same green fees as North Richland Hills residents if a.resident discount fee is ever established, I have encountered some resistance. It may be that this proposal was made based on a lack of understanding about our financing plan for the golf course. It has occurred to me that your Council Members may believe, based on published newspaper stories about the golf course, that its construction is bein9 financed with Revenue Bonds. While we anticipate that golf course revenues will be sufficient to service debt on the borrowed funds, it should be understood that the borrowing was done via Certificates of Obligation, which pledge the full faith and credit of the City of North Richland Hills and its ad valorem taxpayers to service such debt if golf course revenues are insufficient. Therefore, our residents have a heavier risk in terms of possible higher property taxes than do Haltom City residents if some future North Richland Hills City Council should decide to discount green fees and subsidize the golf course through property taxes. ~f~ (817) 281-0041 . 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 . P. O. BOX 18609 . NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180 1 1 . _ 1 I. ; : ,;t;. 1 I I I 1 1 --. I I I I I I I I_ I , ,: -, : . Page Two · .At the same time. we are not unsympathetic toward your concern about possible revenue losses due to the property in your ci~y being converted to tax free municipal ownership. Since the golf course property in Haltom City is all (or virtually all) in the flood plain, such lost revenues would probably be minimal. It seems entirely possible that any such losses would be offset by the enhanced development potential for the privately owned vacant property adjacent to the new .... " golf course as well as the increased value and stabilizing effect that the golf:: ':ë""",P' course should bring to the adjacent Haltom City homes and businesses on both the south and north sides of Loop 820. In addition, the golf course property north of Loop 820 which is in North Richland Hills is now an illegal dump ground to a large , extent which will be corrected in the future by construction and operation of the golf course. This will clearly benefit your neighboring residential areas to the west and northwest of the project. ;. I sincerely hope that the enhanced property values and improved recreational opportunities that the golf course will bring to Haltom City will be sufficient to persuade your City Council to reconsider the requirement concerning parity in green fees. In this regard, please let me assure you that we have no intention to propose such a differential for North Richland Hills, nor has our City Council indicated any int~rest in same. Please let me know is you would like any additional information. Sincerely, len~ Rodger N. Line City Manager RNL/gp cc: Richard Davis C.A. Sanford .' ,,----J,. )(. . .. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie__ I I I I I I I Ie I --. £;J-J' Y OF l-J.).\L-J' !:)J'JJ £;J-J' Y ~ December 28, 1988 ..... . .: ~..~.... 11 "" . .'. 1~:..·~~· . . . - ':. .. ....... "...., .. "¡... .... Mr.~ c. A. Sanford Director of Economic Development ,,'":" ,:<,' . . City of North Richland Hills ...,?.;,.(:\L'.:":,.},:::,:,,,,' P · 0 . Box 18 6 0 9. ':: >: y'. :.: '::> '-,,:/,:,~ !::~;::-:. ": ': ';;'.:::: :;. ~ :": '!'::X<.:,' North Richland Hills, TX.·'.76l80 .""::\'::::, "':/::' .', . "' .'., ~.>.", ;',~,.. " .": ,~: . '.. .... ! : .... ~~ 2· Re: Interlocal Agreement,."7,.:,.~olf Course Project '~~::,,;~~:~~~~~..'. ~'.. ,.' . <', ":,." '...\.,.~~,....", :':'. Dear C. A.: :~~.~:.~~:~~ :",.~'" , , " ~.' '. . '" :. i '"", '. . .. ...... ..;. ~. ...;.: ". .': ,,~. þ . . "": ...",... ".. ... .. -. .. The Haltom City Council approved the Interlocal Agreement as previously discussed with three changes. Our attorney has recommended that next to the last paragraph on page 1 be changed from: '. . n...but not li~ited to, police protection, protection, zoning, permits, licenses, and .all other municipal matters, ..." fire for TO: 11...but not limited to, police protection, fire protecti.on, streets, roads and drainage, public 'health and welfare, waste disposal engineering administrative functions and other governmental matters, ...n ·r~~" The second change was related to the term of the agreement. , It is our intent that the agreement shall remain in effect as long as the course is operated by the City of North Richland Hills as a municipal course. Should the course be leased, sold, consigned, etc. to a private party, Haltom City desires to retain the right to renegotiate this agreement. The final change added by the City Council was, that in as much as almost half of the course is to be built in Haltom City and the City has lost the revenue from water and sewer as well as possibly tax revenues, that Haltom City resi- dents receive the same green fee rate as North Richland Hills residents in the event there is a difference fee structure established. ~ ... ~ 5024 Broadway Avenue, P.O. Box 14246, Haltom City, Texas 76117 817/834-7341 :.., ~ ". -.(.. I· ¡. ___ I . Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I . . You will probably desire to discuss these changes with the City Manager and City Council. I have the original executed by . Mayor Brow~ and will hold it without Mayor Lewis' signature until you have had the opportunity to review these changes with the appropriate parties. 'Contact me if you have any questions. - ~' .; , . Sincere~, ,'-1 ¡(·~U~ Mike Groomer City Manager MG/nd y;:' ~.~> \. -. .. ~. . , ......-: ..' _0.. I Ie 'STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT I . I I I I I I 1tÞ. I I I I I I I Ie I . .". INTER-LOCAL AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas is building a municipally owned daily fee golf course (IRON HORSE AT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS) generally along the contour of the bed of , 'Big Fossil Creek; WHEREAS, the course will be built, owned and operated by the City of North Richland Hills; and WHEREAS, a portion of the golf course will be within the city limits of the City of Haltom City, Texas; and WHEREAS, the undersigned agree that municipal pow~rs and responsibilities in connection with the building and operation of the golf course need to be consolidated under one source of municipal management. NOW, THEREFORE in order to define municipal powers and responsibilities in connection with the building and operation of a golf course on the tract of land which is described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, the cities agree as follows: The City of North Richland Hills, Texas shall be responsible for ,.-",- --J. ~ all municipal functions as they relate to the tract of land shown in Exhibit "A" including, but not limited to, police protection, fire protection, streets, roads and drainage, public health and welfare, .. waste disposal, engineering, administrative functions and other governmental matters, discretionary or otherwise, involving the operation of the golf course and the use of the land involved. ~~, INTER-LOCAL AGREEMENT - Page 1 'I _ I I I I I I --. I I I I I I I I_ I . ' ~ .. .' The City of North Richland Hills agrees to indemnify and hold the City of Haltom City harmless from any and all claims and demands made by any person, firm or corporation in connection with the operation of the golf course on the subject tract as well as any claim or demand arising from its exercise of municipal authority over the tract in question. This agreement shall be in full force and effect so long as the golf course in question is operated by the City of North Richland Hills as a municipal course. Should the course be sold or should the course be leased without city control of expenditures and fee structure, then the City of Haltom City shall have the right to renegotiate this agreement. A copy of the current agreement between Recreational Services, Inc. and the City of North Richland Hills has been reviewed by the parties hereto and the parties agree that such agreement does not constitute a lease without City controls which would give rise to renegotiation of this agreement. SIGNED this day of , 1988. City of North Richland Hills, Texas By "..- ......... Tommy Brown, Mayor - ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary .. -' __ _ City of Haltom City, Texas By Jack o. Lewis ATTEST: Linda Tidwell, City Secretary .. INTER-LOCAL AGREEMENT - Page 2 1- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: .Ubject: I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating BUd, get -L _Other. Z ~~/7/V~:;- ¡¿t¡/1' ~ . Department Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ',I e Purchasing Designation of Mid Cities Daily News as "Official City Newspaper" - Resolution 89-8 Agenda Number: PU 89-07 ~ Council Meeting Date: 2/13/89 On January 23, 1989, at 10:00 a.m., sealed bids were opened for a news publication to act as "Official City Newspaper." The results are outlined below. VENDOR EXCEPTIONS PRICE PER LINE Mid-Cities Daily News o .30 Fort Worth Star Telegram o Northeast Extra Section: .15 Wednesday & Thursday .17 Sunday Regular Classified Section: .35 Monday thru Friday .57 Saturday & Sunday The Fort Worth Star Telegram appears to· have lower price per line rates. However, most of our advertising cannot be scheduled to appear only on Wednesday, Thursday, or Sunday. A review of fiscal year 1987/88 legal advertising expenditures indicates that the rate per line with th~ Star Telegram was always at the higher, regular classified section rates. We therefore recommend that the Mid Cities Daily News be designated as the official newspaper as we estimate that there will be significant savings involved in this designation for 1988/89. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No.89-8 designating the Mid Cities Daily News as the "Official City Newspaper. Finance Review Acct. Number 01-13-01-4010 Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I~ I e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I RESOLUTION NO. 89-8 RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, DESIGNATING AN OFFICIAL CITY NEWSPAPER. WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Texas provide that a City shall designate a City newspaper each year, and; WHEREAS, the City Council has not designated an official newspaper this year, and; WHEREAS, the City Council feels that the City needs an official newspaper. BE IT, THEREFORE, RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: The Mid Cities Daily News is hereby designated as the official City newspaper for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, being a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said newspaper to be used for all official notices and publications of said City. PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th day of February 1989. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Economic Development 2/13/89 .pepa. rtment: Council Meeting Date: ~ Awarding of Bid for Irrigation/Pump Station Installation PU 89-08 I Subject: Agenda Number: Bids for irrigation/pump station installation were opened at 10:00 A.M. on January 25, 1989. I I I I I I The bids have been presented to the Ad Hoc Committee and they, along with the Staff, recommend award as follows: The Yerkey Company 821 E. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 Low Bid $589,713 Lowest Negotiated Bid $564,056 Recommendation: I_It is recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of the Ad Hoc Committee and ,the City Staff that a contract for installation of irrigation/pump stations be awarded to the Yerkey Company in the amount of $564,056. I I I I I Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) .. Operating Budget _ WOther ~ ~ et . r~Le 11 .. ____ Departmeñt H -ad Signature 6 - City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I Finance Director Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Bids were opened on January 25, 1989., Bid tabulation irrigation/pump station installation for Iron Horse Golf Course are as follows: 1. The Yerkey Company $589,713 2. Irri-T·ech $595,225 3. Hall Sprinkler Company $651,333 4. Phillips Lawn Sprinkler $728,190 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ; " Department: _Ubject: Public ~Jorks N 2/13/89 Council Meeting Date: Approval of Miscellaneous Paving and Drainage Improvements 1988 - Change order NO. L. Agenda Number: PW 89-06 The proposed Change Order No. 2 is for construction of 4 foot wide reinforced concrete sidewalk along the east side of Rufe Snow Drive from Cha¡:rnan Road to Hightower Drive and along the south side of Chapnan Road across the Richfield Park frontage. The cost of Change Order NO. 2 is $28,226.40. Funding Source: The proposed Change Order will be an additional' cost to the 19.88 Miscellaneous Paving and Drainage contract awarded to J. L. Bertram ConstIUction Co. Funds are available in Unspecified Streets and may be appropriated as indicated: Fran 13-90-99-4310 $28,227.00 Uhspecified 1987 - Streets To 13-18-87-6150 $28,227.00 1988 Misc. Street Project e d. Recarmen atl.on: The staff recarmends the Council approve Change Order NO. 2 in the amount of $28,226.40 and the transfer of funds as indicated above. ~ ~ ~ I I Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget I-Oth . I GO . Finance Director ent Head Signatur CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ~ City Manager P~nA 1 nf 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I G-r~ KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 23, 1989 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-357, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 - SIDEWALK ALONG CHAPMAN RD. AND RUFE SNOW DRIVE Attached is Change Order No. 2 to the referenced project which has been executed by the Contractor, J.L. Bertram Construction. This change order covers the cost of constructing sidewalks along Richfield Park and along Rufe Snow Drive from Chapman Drive to Hightower Drive. After Council approval of this Change Order, please return a fully executed copy of the change order form to our office for our files. We will be present at the next Council meeting to discuss this change order. Meanwhile, please call if you have any other questions. .----J TEN/ljc Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. Ken Matheson, City Inspector 1901 CENTRAL DR., SU ITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/26 7-336 7 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I " K-E-F NO. 3-357 , CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO THE CONTRACT YHICH YAS DATED DECEMBER 16, 1988 Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (OVNER) (CONTRACTOR) And J.L. BERTRAM CONSTRUCTION CO. For (Description of Project) MISCELLANEOUS PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS : Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: Construct 4' wide, 4" thick concrete sidewalk including reinforcing steel and 1" cushion sand along the south side of Chapman Road 4' off Back of Curb at Richfield Park (1,114 L.F.) and along the east side of Rufe Snow Drive 3' off Back of Curb from Chapman Drive to Hightower Drive (2,600 L.F.) with alignment as required to avoid conflicts with obstacles as directed by the Public Yorks Department. (Total: 3,714 L.F. or 14,856 Sq. Feet) ,- ' Add the following quantities to existing Contract items if accepted by City: ITEM NO. UNIT UNIT PRICE EST. QUANT. TOTAL COST DESCRIPTION 15P. 4' Yide, 4" Thick Reinf. Concrete Sidewalk with 1" Cushion Sand S.F. 1.90 14,856.00 $28,226.40 $28,226.40 $28,226.40 946,122.20 $974,348.60 SUBTOTAL . . . . . . . TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST. * EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT . . REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT. . . . . * Existing Contract Amount May Change Due to Change Order No. 1 Approval. Contract completion time shall be increased by :s Ð calendar days because of this change. ::~RA~: ,; p~ Date: ION OF ACCEPTANCE: / /ZD/g c¡ r , 1989 / 1~3/ ~ By: Date: , 1989 OVNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Date: , 1989 I ..- Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I '1:=· ~.-'j - ~" , .~, r -J ~~l I II ?-~~ /1 1--"'/11 ~ ~- //:h:~ Bursey Road L~;"LJiL 1 ¡}/ ~ { __~' r ~" I =-~ e~,~g, _ L; _'-.=:,'~ ~~~ ~.. !\..~.__ '..__ "L~.J~~; -; -:~' , ,I ;:;&.7'-- .:.. :! ~~'~I~-~,"", ~ '.~.. ~ ,::>' ~ '! .'\~~",',".~,.'~,,-m..~~. . ~ ~,___~..., . ~~,___--:_~I ~ .. II !Ë _~-":_~ II .J1Î~¿Srr?~-- ~ ~~~~~>-,~~i - ~F~%~~~:~j~4 :~¡~.~.>\~.~; ~biii;¡ £'~:~~, : J1l ~.'.,~~,; :St;_~_'II~.;,~,Fr " ª','i~,.L; /~~. .,'. '._::~"-",,:,, . ~_.::- .>:,_;...~\".:",,;;,.~.:'~,~._~_¡}_ ." .,=-~_::, _-=-, ~~\~~t_ "¡.¡:.'''"--,:,: r=~ ~;=-:;_ ___~ E'-~-- ti.'~,..t , ,\ I f í<X,-- _' ,,,"- "-' _ ~--='" =--¡- L.J. }=. ~:Gi,¥_ ~.2._ ~/¿.~':=:~===-., ._\:¥ .' "'1i-' ,,_;;;;Æ if;:." ' .,_.,,~L , .. ~ 1- '/ ~ J ¡-"~~~'~#~-.:1 ~ =. .. i~ :;;,I--==!:¿'-+-= <:».~,~ .:..., ~JF ~ ' .. :~t~~~~§~i~\¡~i~~ ~;~;§~':1~~i~~I~~~~<:»:~~i}i~f;~ld ~ .I~ L:'" '1'_ It ,.~.o "/ ,,.. ,'.,.,,, -<' ),;.,~. -... - -r ..r::-: ~ I i(1- '·1 ~ _ .:-~f=cl::~¡·';';?!Ab~~~~:'..."--~.~~' . ,//' :?~,~'i::~~;;:~ ~ PROPOSED I' ~"",I t;:-r I ;:; ~I__'.o:\..." ~.~~~ ;')~':c';~-A'- SIDEWALKS· -, f''-'":' ;'-~-'··"Ai T~' :iÎffi:~ ~_~~~~:.." :.',~ I !' ~~ i / '~- iIJ¡ ci+=\\'~ . ifF~~ ;~::¡¡"¡uz.! /-::- ...;,.;. '''-.: .. . ,-~. I'_'~ .,~"~ -- -J~~:-~(~;_¡:ït~1{~: I I' ' ,- -cr.t- .---. : J -. '=',: ..\ ':'\-';" -- I , - -ai .i-...it'y,1 ._ ~',¡~·t::"ii"' . ! ~-:~ í·' ,.u = -....~:~ C:'~r 'J I i I l cr: . -.' t - i :: ~-- ~---- -=-.':; .;=, -,' :-.l-- - -=-. -~ -~, u. I _-, I . B . 82Q. _~= --..........., iïT~ ê' ,'.'7f'~ L.'-- ,,-. '. ¡ " '". , - · T-:c--" .I ~....~ ~i-7::J'Tn~~~ :,..!~~~~t~~J· ~ ::.~'~-::.::-l.....· -~. leew~'J / ."~ r' ::JÆ£ I. .. ¡;U'!\j[ =-¡!. " / ' , .... , ~~' / \\ <Ù~~:l~~~~-iit-.·~-t-: "2,: .·__:i..;·;~~: ! I :-;:~~~~;'~ '\, . - "~*"~-'t.fT=~ '. - ._- ~ ~ I '~~~:~~t~~,~~~~iL,~~;l~~;\ . Haltom City \ . "==r -~.r· ~(....¡. '""\ r;: I 1~~:~~'à1irÃ&,',,~~~~,]fi"" ~ -.::~' 1- J.:-' J~ J j ':. ~,' \';:J i..li!!:j ~ r·~·, - ~ ~ ., , ' "" ¡" .. .-' -'::.t'\ \ ~ b CF'~ '~~ Þ~~~i~t~~·'~~· ~ City of Richland Hills ¿Þ~e e-.1 t.; (,«,.~ . ) . f Ci~Colle ville :TI"1r : :~~ :f~) ,..... ,..... C"') City of Keller CI), ::;' ~ --' as' ~ ..c tIO "" = c:: o ..., c: t! ~ II o cr: cu C ... .J ..., ,CJ IC 1... CJ cu '"' ø.. ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS