Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1989-10-09 Agendas I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 9, 1989 - 6:30 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Council Travel - Mayor Brown (5 Minutes) 2. GN 89-133 Extension of AA Wrecker Service Company Towing Contract (Agenda Item No. 13) (5 Minutes) 3. IR 89-78 D.A.R.E Program in Private Schools (10 Minutes) 4. Status of Efforts to Clear Lot at 7204 Lola - Burned House (Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City) (5 Minutes) 5. GN 89-136 Authorization for Letting Contracts for Construction of Parking Lot and Drives at Iron Horse Golf Course (Agenda Item No. 16) (5 Minutes) 6. Items on Consent Agenda not on Pre-Council - (Item Nos. 11, 12, 17 & 18) (3 Minutes) 7. Possible Work Session (2 Minutes) 8. Other Items (5 Minutes) I- I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. *Executive Session (10 Minutes) a. Personnel b. Briefing on Pending Litigation c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition 10. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 9, 1989 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2 . Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting September 25, 1989 5. Presentations by Boards & Commissions a. Beautification Commission Minutes b. Library Board Minutes c. Park and Recreation Board Minutes 6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 7. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (11, 12, 13, 16, 17 & 18) 8. PZ 89-1 Public Hearing - Consideration of Revisions to Zoning Ordinance No. 1080 - Ordinance No. 1636 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. PZ 89-16 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee of Oak Hills Joint Venture, to rezone Lots BR, 12R, & 19R thru 37R, Block 7, Oak Hills Addition from 0-1 Office and R-4-SD Separate Ownership Duplex to R-2 Single Family (Located on the north side of Meandering Drive) 10. Ordinance No. 1637 *11. GN 89-131 Multi-Agency Task Force Agreement *12. GN 89-132 November 7, 1989 Election - Method of Selection for a Court of Record Judge - Ordinance No. 1638 *13. GN 89-133 Extension of AA Wrecker Service Company Towing Contract 14. GN 89-134 Appointment to Civil Service Commission 15. GN 89-135 Nomination of Representative to Board of Directors Tarrant Appraisal District I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *16. GN 89-136 Authorization for Letting Contracts for Construction of Parking Lot and Drives at Iron Horse Golf Course *17. PW 89-36 Miscellaneous Drainage Projects/Willowcrest/Wendell/ Tourist Drive *18. PW 89-37 Award of Bid on Miscellaneous 1989 Water Line Replacements 19. Citizens Presentation 20. Adjournment I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. 89-78 Jrz x :::::=- y Date: October 2, 1989 SUbject:D.A.R.E. program in private schools During Septemberr officers from the Fort Worth Police Department Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) program contacted officials with Fort Worth Christian School and offered to provide D.A.R.E. instruction to their school at no cost. This offer was apparently made in order for Fort Worth to meet the contact-hour numbers in their D.A.R.E. Grant. After finding the Fort Worth Christian School wanted the program Fort Worth Police representative contacted our agency to request permission to teach in our City. We advised them that we did not object to them teaching in North Richland Hills private schools as long as they taught in all three private schools in this City. They agreed to do so and scheduled D.A.R.E. instruction with these private schools. After agreeing to instruct in the private schools, Fort Worth Police Department recontacted these private schools and advised that they would not be able to teach outside their City. One of the private schools in this City has subsequently requested information on costs of having a North Richland Hills Police Officer provide D.A.R.E. education in that school. Based on FY 89-90 funding for the D.A.R.E. position of $46,885, divided by the actual number of hours of instruction provided to the public schools, the per hour cost of instruction is estimated to be $51.40. multiplying this rate by the 14 weeks of instruction provided (one hour a week,) projects the Police Departments actual instruction costs to be $719.00 per class for the fourteen week program. In addition to the instruction cost, their are material costs of $5.61 per student per semester. These costs include; workbooks, bookmarks, bumper stickers, buttons, rulers, certificates, T-shirts and stickers. Based on a class size of thirty (30) students, this would equal $168.30. The materials for the public school programs were provided by the Northeast Lions Club, with no impact on the City budget. No funds are provided for the private schools. The total projected costs for instructing one D.A.R.E. program to thirty children in a private school is $887.30. This figure should be rounded to $900.00 to cover any unforeseen expenditures. At the present time, the one D.A.R.E. Officer approved in this years budget would not be able to teach in all three private schools if they were to request the program. We would be able, however, to provide instruction with our backup D.A.R.E. instructor, who is assigned to the Patrol Division, on an overtime basis. In order to provide this service, the funds collected from the private schools would need to be split between the Patrol Overtime and Educational Services accounts of the Police Department budget. It is not feasible for this agency to undertake this instruction unless the City Council wishes to authorize both the overtime and supplies required and to instruct the Police Department to enter into a contract with one or more private schools to provide both manpower and supplies under this contract. ~GlaSSOn ~~f O:~~ - ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 25, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order September 25, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. Present: Tommy Brown Richard Davis Lyle E. Welch Mack Garvin Frank Metts, Jr. Charles Scoma Byron Sibbet Linda Spurlock Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath C.A. Sanford Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Greg Dickens 2. ROLL CALL Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Counci lman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer 3. INVOCATION Councilman Garvin gave the invocation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1989 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet to approve the minutes of the September 11, 1989 meeting. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated for a point-of-clarification, in reference to PZ 89-15, because there was only one quarter acre, and was adjacent to C-2, it would not be spot zoning. Motion carried 7-0. 5. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 APPROVED I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I September 25, 1989 Page 2 Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Welch to approve the minutes of the September 18, 1989 meeting. Motion carried 6-0, Councilman Scoma abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 6. PRESENTATIONS BY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS None 7. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION TO CAREFLITE Mayor Brown presented a Proclamation to Mr. Rick Davis, proclaiming October 1, 1989 as Careflite Day. Mayor Brown and Mayor Pro Tem Davis presented Mr. Dennis Horvath with a certificate which represented his 10 years of service to the City. 8. SPECIAL PRESENTATION OF IIYARD OF THE MONTHII AWARDS Mayor Brown and Kathy Robinson, Chairman of the Beautification Commission, presented the following citizens with the IIYard of the Monthll Awards: Mr. & Mrs. Roger Webb, 6820 Meadow Road; Mr. Kirkland, 6752 Parkwood; Mr. & Mrs. Greg Hull, 5513 Ashspring Court; Mr. & Mrs. Larry Kelly, 5641 Jamaica; Mrs. Wanda Stuart & Mr. Scott Stuart, 5125 Cummings; and" Mr. & Mrs. Larry Nida, 6409 Simmons. 9. SPECIAL PRESENTATION BY JIMMY D. WILLIAMS Mr. Jimmy D. Williams presented Chief McGlasson with a $6,200 donation, from various citizens, for the purchase of firearms for the Police Department. 10. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Davis removed items 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19 from the Consent Agenda. 11. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (13, 15, 20, 21, 23, 34, 35, 36, 37 & 38) APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I September 25, 1989 Page 3 12. PZ 89-11 PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE #1080, SECTION 24.6 (TEMPORARY SALES) ALLOWING SCHOOLS AND CHURCHES TO HAVE RUMMAGE SALES - ORDINANCE NO. 1628 APPROVED Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve Ordinance No. 1628. Motion carried 7-0. *13. GN 89-110 AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 1560 CHIMNEY INSPECTIONS _ ORDINANCE NO. 1629 APPROVED 14. GN 89-111 RENAMING MUNICIPAL DRIVE TO DICK FISHER DRIVE _ ORDINANCE NO. 1632, AND ESTABLISHING NAME OF BEAR CREEK BOULEVARD - ORDINANCE NO. 1633 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve Ordinance No. 1632. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that he had served six years with Dick Fisher and would like to recognize all of his service to the City. Mayor Pro Tern Davis recognized Mrs. Pat Fisher, Chris Fisher, Lynette Fisher and Debra Sims, Dick Fisher's family. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No. 1633. Motion carried 7-0. *15. GN 89-112 SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVED I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I September 25, 1989 Page 4 16. GN 89-113 ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 BUDGET _ ORDINANCE NO. 1631 APPROVED Councilman Scoma discussed the impact the tax increase would have on the homeowners as well as the non-residential. Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to approve the 1989-90 Budget with the following recommendations: approve the staff recommendation on the merit increase and include thp incentive pay and the salary updates; reduce the number of new firefighters from six to three; the employees pay ten percent of personal and dependants insurance; that the gasoline expenditures be frozen at the 1988/89 budget level. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked Councilman Scoma if the figures he gave on the tax increase included just city taxes. Councilman Scoma stated it included school, county and City taxes. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that, unfortunately, all that could be controlled was City taxes. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated he did not agree with reducing the firefighters to three; that even if the firefighters were hired by January 1st it would be next July before they would actually be on the street. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated the employees' participation in insurance was increased therefore some of the cost was passed on to the employees. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he did not think the City stockpiled gasoline; that he would trust management to monitor this but if the City had more vehicles than it used then a conservation program might be looked at. Motion failed 5-2, Councilmen Scoma and Welch voting for; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilmen Garvin, Sibbet, Metts and Councilwoman Spurlock voting against. Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the 1989-90 Budget as recommended by the staff. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated that he would recommend that, if at mid-year revenues were sufficient, the additional tanker for the Fire Department could be purchased and the Master Plan be updated. Councilwoman Spurlock asked if the delay on the merit increase was being looked into to see if there was a way to formulate it. Mr. Line stated that it might be possible but the City would probably have to hire an accountant to keep up with it. Mr. Line stated the same employees were not being penalized each year. Motion carried 6-1, Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilmen Garvin, Sibbet, Metts, Welch and Councilwoman Spurlock voting for; Councilman Scoma voting against. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I September 25, 1989 Page 5 17. GN 89-114 CERTIFIED TAX ROLL - RESOLUTION NO. 89-40 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve GN 89-114 and Resolution No. 89-40 as recommended on the cover sheet. Motion carried 7-0. 18. GN 89-115 EXEMPTIONS FOR BUDGET YEAR 1989/90 _ RESOLUTION NO. 89-41 APPROVED Councilman Welch moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, to approve GN 89-115 and Resolution No. 89-41 as recommended on the cover sheet. Motion carried 7-0. 19. GN 89-116 TAX RATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 _ ORDINANCE NO. 1630 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve GN 89-116 and Ordinance No. 1630 as recommended on the cover sheet. Motion carried 6-1, Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilmen Garvin, Metts, Sibbet, Welch and Councilwoman Spurlock voting for; Councilman Scoma voting against. *20. GN 89-117 APPROVE WATER PIPELINE CROSSING AGREEMENT WITH MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY _ RESOLUTION NO. 89-39 APPROVED *21. GN 89-118 INCREASE IN VEHICLE IMPOUNDMENT FEES _ ORDINANCE NO. 1634 APPROVED 22. GN 89-119 PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION FOR TAX ABATEMENT BY AEGON/LIFE INVESTORS _ ORDINANCE NO. 1635 & RESOLUTION NO. 89-42 APPROVED Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called anyone wishing to speak in favor to please come forward. Mr. Dave Feltner, representing AEGON, appeared before the Council. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I September 25, 1989 Page 6 Mr. Feltner presented a design concept and gave background information on AEGON. Councilman Scoma stated he had concern that if AEGON had space they did not need it might be rented or leased before they were paying the full tax rate, because of existing office space in the City that was paying the full rate. Mr. Feltner stated he did not foresee renting any space, there were affiliated companies that might want to utilize the space. Councilman Scoma stated that as it was a part of the same corporate umbrella he would not have a problem with it. Mr. Feltner stated that AEGON might have a situation with a company that did not fall within the corporate umbrella, but did extensive business with the facility and they might want to house them together. Councilman Welch moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No. 1635 and Resolution No. 89-42 as recommended on the cover sheet. Councilwoman Spurlock stated she also had concerns with space being rented or leased. Councilwoman Spurlock stated she would like to reiterate that if other businesses that were part of AEGON she would have no problem. Mr. Feltner stated that the corporation fell under several umbrellas and he was concerned about what level the City wanted to draw the line. The line of investors; the AEGON level or AEGON International level. Mayor Brown asked Mr. Feltner if he would be comfortable with the AEGON International. Mr. Feltner stated yes. Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis to amend the motion to state that the use of the building would be limited to AEGON International exclusively for five years. Attorney for the City and AEGON International to establish the wording in the contract. Motion carried 7-0. *23. GN 89-120 PUBLIC FUNDS INVESTMENT POLICY APPROVED 24. GN 89-121 APPOINTMENTS TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve GN 89-121 as recommended on the cover sheet with the correction of the alternate being Place 3 and the appointee Place 5. I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I September 25, 1989 Page 7 Motion carried 7-0. 25. GN 89-122 APPOINTMENTS TO BOARD OF APPEALS APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Council Metts to approve GN 89-122 as recommended on the cover sheet. Motion carried 7-0. 26. GN 89-123 APPOINTMENTS TO CABLE TELEVISION BOARD APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve GN 89-123 as recommended on the cover sheet. Motion carried 7-0. 27. GN 89-124 APPOINTMENTS TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVED Councilman Scoma moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis to approve GN 89-124 as recommended on the cover sheet. Motion carried 7-0. 28. GN 89-125 APPOINTMENTS TO CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION APPROVED Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve GN 89-125 as recommended on the cover sheet. Motion carried 7-0. 29. GN 89-126 APPOINTMENTS TO LIBRARY BOARD APPROVED Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, to approve GN 89-126 as recommended on the cover sheet. Motion carried 7-0. 30. GN 89-127 APPOINTMENTS TO PARK AND RECREATION BOARD APPROVED I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I September 25, 1989 Page 8 Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, to approve GN 89-127 with the correction of adding Place 2 to the cover sheet. Motion carried 7-0. 31. GN 89-128 APPOINTMENTS TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Councilman Scoma to approve GN 89-128 as recommended on the cover sheet. Motion carried 7-0. 32. GN 89-129 APPOINTMENTS TO TEEN COURT ADVISORY BOARD APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Metts to approve GN 89-129 as recommended on the cover sheet. Motion carried 7-0. 33. GN 89-130 APPOINTMENT TO BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION APPROVED Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve GN 89-130 as recommended on the cover sheet. Motion carried 7-0. *34. PU 89-19 RATIFY THE PURCHASE OF BORING MACHINE APPROVED *35. PU 89-20 AWARD OF BID TO PHYSIO-CONTROL CORPORATION FOR DEFIBRILLATOR/MONITORS APPROVED *36. PU 89-21 AWARD OF OFFICE SUPPLY CONTRACT TO BOISE CASCADE APPROVED *37. PU 89-22 AWARD OF BID FOR KITCHEN EQUIPMENT TO ALLIED FOOD SERVICE AND GERNSBACHER1S APPROVED I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I September 25, 1989 Page 9 *38. PU 89-23 APPROVAL OF REPLACEMENT OF THIRTY TON AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM FOR CITY HALL ON AN EMERGENCY BASIS APPROVED 38.A. PAY 89-07 APPROVAL OF FINAL PAYMENT TO BRUCE COMPANY FOR DIRT WORK ON IRON HORSE GOLF COURSE APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, to approve PAY 89-07 as recommended on the cover sheet. Motion carried 7-0. 39. CITIZENS PRESENTATION MR. LONNIE JEFFERS 7300 BOCA RATON RE: DIRT BIKE NUISANCE Mr. Lonnie Jeffers, 7300 Boca Raton, appeared before the Council. Mr. Jeffers stated that dirt bikes were being ridden on the vacant property by his house. Mr. Jeffers stated the noise was almost unbearable. Mr. Jeffers requested the City to try and help with the problem. Mr. Jeffers presented a petition signed by the residents in the area. Mr. Line advised Mr. Jeffers that the City was aware of the problem and the Police had been sent to the area. Mr. Line stated the biggest problem was catching the riders because it was hard for a patrol car to go where a motorcycle could. Chief McGlasson advised that some of the police officers had dirt bikes and on their day off had gone to the location. Chief McGlasson advised that some citations had been issued. Chief McGlasson stated the owner of the property was going to put up no trespassing signs. Ms. Myrtis Byrd, 7312 Hialeah Circle, appeared before the Council. Ms. Byrd stated she lived on Hialeah Circle and she could also hear the noise. Ms. Byrd stated there was a problem with the bikers. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I September 25, 1989 Page 10 40. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Beautification Commission of the City of North Richland Hills Pre-Council Chamber, 7301 NE Loop 820, September 5, 1989 at 7:00 P.M. Pre-Council Chambers, City Hall, 7301 Northeast Loop 820 MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE Kathy Robinson Alice Scoma Janice Davis Juanita Kemp MEMBERS NOT IN ATTENDANCE: Pat Fisher Robert Powers Arfan Jabri ALSO IN ATTENDANCE Brenda Sralla, Volunteer MEETING CALLED TO ORDER Ms. Robinson called the meeting to order at 7:10 P.M.. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Motion made by Ms. Scoma and seconded by Ms. Kemp to approve the minutes of the August 1, 1989. ITEM 4: ELECTION OF OFFICERS The fOllowing nominations for officers were made: Kathy Robinson - Chairman Alice Scoma - Vice Chairman Janice Davis - Secretary Juanita Kemp - Treasurer All officers were elected unanimously. Ms. Robinson recommended the adherence to By-Law #6 which states: "Any member who is absent from two consecutive meetings without first notifying the Chairman by 12:00 noon of the meeting day, and/or fails to exhibit a general interest in the Commission's endeavors shall be recommended for removal from the Commission" and ask for resignations from members not attending meetings. ITEM 5: DISCUSSION OF LANDSCAPE PLANS Ms. Davis reported that a tree preservation ordinance is necessary if the Commission is going to compete for the "Keep Texas Beautiful" award or the "Tree City U.S.A." award. She will work with the City Attorney to write a simplified form to preserve large or historic trees only, specifically naming .the pecan tree at Cardinal Lane and Martin. I Ie I I ITEM 6: I I ITEM 7: ITEM 8: I I I ITEM 9: Ms. Davis requested using the next workshop meeting to go through all zoning ordinances and add recommendations for more specific landscape requirements. DISCUSSION OF GLENVIEW DRIVE/RUFE SNOW DRIVE ISLAND Ms. Scoma and Ms. Robinson will get estimates from independent contractors to present to the CIP at their next meeting. DELETED - DISCUSSED WITH ITEM #5 DISCUSSION OF ESTIMATES ON GARDEN FENCES Councilwoman Linda Spurlock has requested that the Commission get estimates for a brick, wrought-iron, or combination fence for the garden planned outside City Hall.. Various designs of fences were discussed and Ms. Robinson will check with brick layers or fence builders about price. DISCUSSION OF OTHER ITEMS Ms. Sralla suggested adding a "Beautification Column" as a ~egular feature of the quarterly newsletter put out by the City. I~he suggested giving tips for plants that grow well in this area, or other gardening guides. Ms. Davis suggested that the Commission purchase a copy of Neil Sperry's gardening book for that purpose. I I I I I I Christmas Tree Lighting - Motion was made by Ms. Scoma to have the lighting ceremony on December 2, at 6:00 P.M.. Second was made by Ms. Davis. Ms. Robinson suggested a poster contest to publicize the lighting ceremony. Suggestions included using 5th graders at all elementary schools in the City and awarding one $5.00 prize at each school. Brenda Sralla volunteered to coordinate the poster contest. Ms. Scoma suggested taking the posters to the senior citizens center for judging Dates for the children to make the posters were set for October 16-30. Ms. Robinson reported that we need to check the Christmas lights in storage to determine how many new bulbs are needed. She has located a wholesale outlet for lights. Ms. Robinson, Ms. Scoma and Ms. Davis will meet with Alan Hamm on September 15 to discuss his suggestions for business landscape. THE NEXT WORKSHOP MEETING WILL BE SEPTEMBER 19. THE NEXT REGULAR I MEETING WILL BE OCTOBER 3. e I I I Ie I ITEM 10: ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Ms. Davis to adjourn at 9:45 P.M.. I by Ms. Kemp · I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Second Respectfully Submitted, Janice Davis Secretary .' I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I NORTH RICHLAND HILLS LIBRARY BOARD Minutes September 21) 1989 The North Richland Hills Library Board met in the board room of the library on September 21, at 7 p.m. Present were Jan Daniels, Roxie Hamilton, Clyde Zellers, Alisa Wood, Bob Hardy, and Arlita Hallam. Absent: Polly Brinkley and Janice Fenimore. Chairman Jan Daniels called the meeting to order. The minutes of the August 31 meeting were adjusted to reflect that a quorum was present and to show that a motion made by Bob Hardy to change the regular meeting day and time was not seconded. Clyde Zellers moved, Alisa Wood seconded, and the motion carried to approve the amended minutes of August 31, and the minutes of June 28 meetings. Library Director Arlita Hallam reported on the library's new book discussion group, Book Break, and the children's Wednesday morning story times and after school celebrity story times. Clyde Zellers reported on the North Texas Library System meeting held this morning. Channel 5 will be promoting VISA cards, with proceeds used to buy Bluebonnet Award books for Metroplex libraries. Feedback has been requested from member libraries regarding the Texas State Library's Project Leadership proposal. Arlita stated that the City Council will be making new board/commission appoint- ments at the September 25 Council meeting. Plans for an appreciation dinner for retiring members will be discussed later. The City Council will vote on the 1989/90 proposed budget at the meeting on September 25. Arlita distributed copies of the materials budget to members. Chairman Jan Daniels reviewed the recent meeting of board/commission chairs with the City Council on board/council communications. Clyde Zellers moved, Roxie Hamilton seconded, motion carried to move the election of officers scheduled for this meeting to the October meeting. Bob Hardy voted to holà the election at this meeting. The next regular meeting will be October 19, 1989, at 7 p.m. Arlita Hallam I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD I 4IÞBOARD IN ATTENDANCE Don Tipps, Vice Chairman J. Douglas Davis Bob Fenimore Sharon Battles Bobbie Lambert I I I I I I I BOARD NOT IN ATTENDANCE: David MCGilvary, Chairman Ron Parks Wade Parkey ALSO IN ATTENDANCE Jim Browne, Director, PARD Vickie Loftice, Recreation Coordinator Dawn Anderson, Recreation Clerk APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Mr. Davis made a motion to approve the minutes of the August 7, 1989 Parks and Recreation Board meeting. Mrs. Battles seconded the motion. Vote was unanimous in favor of the motion by, those in attendance at the August 7, 1989. "meet1.ng. NEW BUSINESS ITEM 4: NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SENIOR CENTER REPORT I I I I Mr. Browne gave the fOllowing report: I I Ie I I 4IÞMaryanne Gibson gave the following report: I Everyone at the Center is looking forward the beginning of construction of the Senior Center addition. The Center is planning an Open House at the completion of the addition. The Cookie Sale at the Recreation Center produced $66.00 for the Richland High School SCholarship Fund. A Bake Sale is scheduled for October 18 at the Recreation Center. The Annual Thanksgiving Open House and Cràft Sa¡e is being planned. Monthly lunches and special one-day trips to the museums are continuing. Visitors from Australia and Liberia have visited the Senior Center while staying with their children. An open invitation was extended to all who wish to visit the Center. ITEM 5: SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER BUILDING ADDITION STATUS REPORT The City Council approved a bid of $67,531.00 and committed $9,000.00 from the City Council Contingency Fund at the August 14, 1989 City Council meeting. The County Commissioner's Court approved and authorized the project at their August 21, 1989 meeting. A pre-construction conference has been set for September 8, 1989, at 10:00 A.M.. Demolition of the existing garage is in progress. I ITEM 6: RICHLAND YOUTH ASSOCIATION REPORT I Mr. Williamson, Vice President, RYA, gave the following report: ~he Association expressed their thanks for the plaque received at the August 28, 1989 City Council meeting for their community service. Football registration is continuing and they expect to begin their season soon. An organizational meeting was held and she is continuing to make appointments for the NRGSL Board positions. An expression of appreciation was given for the Board and Staff's efforts in the consideration given by ~City Council for the Fossil Creek Park Ballfields renovation of the I"'lighting system. ITEM 8: BUDGET REPORT I I I I I I I Carroll Scruggs, Baseball commissioner, RYA, approached the Board with the fOllowing information: The ballfields are in excellent condition and the playing surfaces were the best in the Tarrant County. A total of $29,680.00 including the value of volunteer manhours spent mostly on the baseball fields and some on the football fields. A request that the fields be closed to adult use and be designated as "youth only fields" due to the problems they are having with adults damaging the fields. Damage has occurred to the sprinkler system. Some lights are out and bleachers need to be replaced. Discussion was held on Mr. Scruggs request with recommendations being withheld until Agenda Item 9. ITEM 7: NORTH RICHLAND GIRLS SOFTBALL LEAGUE REPORT Karen Allen, Commissioner, NRGSL, gave the fOllowing report: I I I I I I Mr. Browne gave the following information: The City Council gave prelimin~ry approval for the FY.1989-9D Budget as proposed by the staf~ and city management at the Annual Budget Workshop August 18-20, 19~9. The City Council recommended the authorization of two (2) additional Parks Maintenance Workers and one (1) Recreation Leader position for evening supervision of the Recreation Center. The City Council recommended budgeting $75,000.00 for ballfield lighting system replacement. Additional funding for park improvement was not considered at that time. Staff is examining the feasibility of incorporating some of the desired additional improvements through a combined volunteer and departmental long range plan for field expansion. The City Council also recommended delaying employee merit raises by three months and increasing the employee's contribution towards dependent health insurance from $50-$75 per month while increasing the deductible from 1_$100-$200 per person. I I I NOTE: This proposed budget will not be officially adopted until Council I votes and approve the proposed budget and tax rate at their September 28, 4Ir989 meeting. . Discussion was held. I I I I I I I ITEM 9: ATHLETIC FIELD USE POLICY Mr. Browne gave the following information for a possible City Council policy recommendation: An "Ad Hoc" Committee meeting was held on August 14, 1989 to discuss various aspects of an athletic field use policy. (The Committee, appointed by the Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Board, consisted of representatives from the Board, RYA and the NRGSL.) The Committee did not have a formal recommendation at this time. However, the Staff has prepared a recommended policy and a revised "User ContractU for Board consideration. A memo was submitted by Staff to the Board with an outline of the proposed policy which hopefully provides a balanced and equitable field use policy which benefits the youth sport organizations without precluding or reducing use of public recreation facilities and parks by the general public and citizens of North Richland Hills. Discussion was held on the proposed policy. Mr. Davis made motion to approve a contractual agreement for use of city parks and athletic facilities. Ms. Battles seconded the motion. Vote was unanimous in favor of the motion. ~TEM 10: PARKS DIVISION UPDATE I Mr. Browne gave the following report in Mr. Giacomarro's absence: I I 'I ITEM 11: I I I I~ I I A soil sample from the golf course site for the tree farm has been sent to Texas A&M for analysis. Results should be received soon. A co-purchase by the Cities of North Richland Hills and Hurst for a tree spade is being considered. A chipper has also been purchased by the golf course and will be made available to the Parks Division. Beautification of the Rufe Snow/Glenview Drive Island is being coordinated by the Beautification Commission. ATHLETICS/RECREATION UPDATE Ms. Vickie Loftice, Recreation Coordinator, gave the following report in Ms. Walsh's absence: Registration for Fall classes has been very high. Approximately $11,000.00 has been collected for recreation classes in the month of August, alone. There has been a good response from the brochures which are mailed to 17,800 households in North Richland Hills. New classes are proving to be very successful. Data is still being collected for a policy and procedure manual. Clinics and workshops have been held for basketball, clowning and cheerleading. I Mr. Browne stated that the cancer patient had passed away tW9 weeks after the filming on Citicable 36. He commended the Ms. Walsh, Ms. Loftice and the Recreation staff for taking the time for this young man, as well as the overall good job that they do. Many of the creative new ideas come from Monica, Vickie, Dawn and the Recreation Attendants. Mr. Browne also informed the Board that Mr. Parkey called this afternoon and offered his l~reSignation from the Board due to a family concerns (deaths in the family) and not having the time available to be active on the Board. The appropriate council member will be notified to go ahead and appoint a new Board member for that position. I I I I I I I Summer basketball and co-rec volleyball leagues have completed their season with a combined total of 24 teams. (8 for basketball and 16 for I volleyball). A total of 52 teams have signed up for the Fall Softball tþLeagues. The Second Annual "SportsFest" is being planned for September 30 - October 20, 1989. To date there has been an excellent response. The Recreation Division has had the wonderful opportunity to work with the Wednesday's Child Foundation by enrolling a sponsored child in the gymnastics-and summer camp programs this summer. Mr. John Criswell has been extended an opportunity to film at the Recreation Center. A 10 year old terminally ill cancer patient was given his wish to have drawing lessons at the Recreation Center. Our art instructor, Lurlene Bowden, filmed a special segment on her Citicable 36 program and dedicated the drawing class to him. Ms. Loftice attended a management workshop and several new employees attended the "Providing Services Professionally" training program. Mr. Tipps complimented the Fall brochure was very well done. Mr. Browne made mention that all of the Staff worked together on the brochure. Mr. Tipps also requested that all Board members join in on "Sportsfest". ITEM 12: DISCUSSION OF OTHER ITEMS I I I I I I Itþ I I ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Mr. Lambert to adjourn at 7:50 P.M... Ms. Battles seconded the motion. Vote was unanimous in favor of the motion. Respectfully ~1 iGi a Gonzalez Recording Secretary ~~ I Ie I' ._~ . '. . '. . . '~~: ,<r~;~;;:\~~;~{i;(;~,gts:l%~~~~fi~~~'~~0:~;i{;:~~'Z~~~~ij~~á~~::;j:'~?~~t::í,,;~; ;~¥:~~ <:~~+::1X~<~;:~:~i~~~;J,"~~E;~~~';~¿~~g~&;1£~{:~J~;'X~j~%'~~:¡~~tl:ff I I I . . . ~ . . . . , . ... '. . ',' '-. . I.·· '. ...... . .' .'," :::{,'::·,"-:?.·f·" ~·?~·'::-:-:;e'~,;·~:':/-~;':? ~-:'~">'?:t~f£-'~:~i'1)~::;:;~~ . . . '..~ '.,.:,:.: :;-~. J;,.::~.; ~-,~u:.-Z:k\~,~);:. 'i~)~:{~<~::;>~~;:~:,~~f :~~~r;:{~~:<: ~;: I .... ':,-:.~~..:..,,: .........-.. '., .r"'.. ':.,,~; .>: '", .'i:~·:;~:~--,: r...:~'......:. ;. . ~...~·.1~. ~ >:¡ :::5""::~'~"".. . -.',. ......... '.".. ...' ...:',"'; "-, .,. -".: =<. -:. '~'-~.' ~'': '.;..of. .....; ..... ...': ...:-~ '~';~,..... . ... ,<"~.., "t~~f:~'''' ". . . . ,. .. . , . ..... . :j~¡,~~:;:~~~;{.;,{;:Ú~-~~;~it:~£¡~(~fiB~~t:a;~~~~~Þ;~;t~~~f}f~1fj~h1W4~~~¡~~1;~:~f~{[j:;:-~ ,.. ~.' ..... - -. - ", I ~ ..., J-' '.,: .......·.··::.~?:;;-:::~:~,~!~x~;.c_~y~t~~tt~i~~;~?j.~f.~~~,'~1~~:-$}1IEf:~ilg:.. . :. _..:...", -" '. ". .:.... ,'. :.... S:~~~ª0~~0¿>~~~=S3~~!~ ~ I ..'-.....~~. ~_. .~I "";,," I I - , ~ . .... :··I~~~;;if~~~~.¡iä~~~~Øt;.£~~i~:t#t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~itit~~£(~~~~~¥~~~ - . -.-~i.~_-~' .' I~, I I ~,:~:~'·'~'~~--"~'~Y~:'R'" , ",. ". "., i, '"";"""'1i;"~Y:".' ".,,, " ,"~'...' I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I ~epartment: Subject: Economic Development/Planning I Consideration of revisions to Ordinance - Council Meeting Date: PZ 89-1 Agenda Number: 10/9/89 #1080 (Zoning Ordinance). Public Hearing. I I Ordinance f/1636 On January 26, 1989 the Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing to receive input into the revision of Ordinance #1080. Those citizens present to speak included: I I Charles Parish Charles Scoma Kathy Robinson John Barfield Matt Speight J. B. Sandlin Alice Scoma Tom Duer* I I Ie ~I *Had given comment of support on side/rear entry garages to Commissioner Wood for presentation at the meeting. The attached minutes of the above meeting highlight the comments made at the Public Hearing. The Public Hearing was closed and the meeting adjourned. At the September 14, 1989 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, the Commission,' after discussion at several work sessions in the interim, voted to approve the revisions to the Zoning Ordinance as presented in this cover sheet. Two comments are made for Council's consideration: ~I ir'l 1) The sentence relative to rear building lines, which has been deleted from each residential district, reads: "However, in no case shall the rear building line be closer than ten (10) feet to the rear lot line or closer than five (5) feet of an easement." (01 ~:I ~':"I': ~'; 2) To insure that model homes are returned to their original state, the Community Development Department will not issue a Certificate of Occupancy until all requirements have been met. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Department Head Signature CITY COU CIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~zl_ S~~~~es ~~~~~~:.~ . Operating Budget 1,1 Other , . \).~~W. ~ í~l~ : ~L '] ,;¿J tf(ltt~ tity Manager .' Finance Director Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ~ŒETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 - 7:30 P. M. The meeting was called to Chairman, John Schwinger, PRESENT: Chairman Vice Chairman Secretary Members John Schwinger Mark Wood David Barfield Don Bowen Ron Lueck James Brock r. Economic Dev./ Planning P & Z Coordinator Bob Miller Wanda Calvert ABSENT: David Greene Pat Marin THE MINUTES , 1989 1. PZ 89-1 Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-0 with Mr. Lueck and Mr. Brock abstaining since they were not present at the meeting. Consideration of reV1S1ons to Zoning Ordinance B1080. Public Hearing held January 26, 1989. Mr. Wood said he was concerned that they need to make a stipulation as to the size of the first floor of two story houses. He said for an 1,800 square foot house, if they made the bottom floor 900 square feet, it would look like a box. Mr. Miller stated the Staff could research it. He said they could approve the amendment for 2/3 or 3/4 being on the ground floor based on Staff review. Mr. Wood stated he felt it should be a minimum of 2/3 of the house be on the ground floor. He said he felt this should be in each residential category. I Page 2 p & Z Minutes Ie September 14, 1989 I I I I I I I Ie I I I PZ 89-1 I APPROVED I 2. PZ 89-16 I Ie I I Mr. Barfield stated that on "fences in front yards", it should read a maximum of 4 feet high excluding the posts, and that the posts may be masonry. Ms. Calvert asked if the Commission intends for the classification of R-l-S Single Family to have the same stipulations as R-l Single Family. Mr. Bowen stated they did. Mr. Wood stated an additional wording should be added in Commercial and Industrial zoning. He said in C-1 and C-2 requires 1 acre of land to request a zoning change, and I-I and 1-2 requires 2 acres. He said it should be added that it could be less where a parcel of land is contiguous with like zoning. Mr. Lueck said in each residential classification, to delete the last sentence of (c) of Building line requirements in R-I, R-I-S, R-2, R-3, R-4-SD, and R-8 zoning classifications. Mr. Barfield said it should be stated that swimming pools should be no closer to utilities than allowed by code. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve and recommend forwarding all changes and amendments to the City Council for approval. This motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the motion carried 6-0. Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley Trustee of Oak Hills Jo· enture, to rezone Lots BR , & 19R thru 37R, Block Hills Addition, from r present classifications of 0-1 Office and R-4-SD Separate Ownership Duplex to R-2 Single Family. This property is located on the north side of Meandering Drive. I Ie I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS JANUARY 26, 1989 - 7:30 P. M. I CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, John Schwinger, at 7:30 P.M. I ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Vice Chairman Secretary Members John Schwinger Mark Wood David Barfield Don Bowen Ron Lueck James Brock David Greene Pat Marin C.A. Sanford George Tucker Wanda Calvert I I I Alt. Member Dir. Economic Dev. Dir. Planning/Dev. P & Z Coordinator I Ie Since all members are present, Alternate Pat Marin will not vote. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 12, 1989 Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Barfield and the motion carried 6-0 with Mr. Lueck abstaining since he was not present at the meeting. I I 1. PZ 89-1 Public Hearing for discussion of proposed revisions to the Zoning Ordinance 111080. I I Chairman Schwinger read the proposed revisions: I 1. R-l Single Family District Increase side yard requirements from seven feet each side to 10 feet on one side and six feet on the other side. Only side or rear entry garage will be allowed. Reduce minimum lot size from 13,000 square feet to 12,000 square feet. Minimum house size to remain at 1,800 square feet. I Ie I I I Page 2 p & Z Minutes Ie January 26, 1989 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I 2. R-2 Single Family District Increase side yard requirements from six feet each side to ten feet one side and six feet on the other side. Only side or rear entry garages will be allowed. Minimum house size to remain at 1,600 square feet. 3. R-3 Single Family District Be allowed only as a buffer zone. 4. R-5-D Duplex District Delete from Ordinance. R-4-SD District to remain and fill gap with minimum dwelling unit size increased from 1,000 square feet to 1,200 square feet. 5. R-6-T Townhouse and Garden Home District Garden home use be removed from the Distri~t. Minimum lot width be increased from twenty feet to thirty feet. Minimum dwelling unit size be increased from 1,000 square feet to 1,200 square feet. 6. R-B Zero Lot Line District Allowed only as a buffer zone. 7. Special Development Controls Add Section - Sidewalks required in all districts with exception of AG on all public streets. Add Section - Side or rear entrance garages required in R-I and R-2 Single Family Districts. Add Section to allow model homes with restrictions. Apply restrictions on rodeo type activities on lots or tracts containing less than five acres. Add wording to allow swimming pools to be constructed adjacent to an easement upon approval by Building Official. Add wording to allow non-sight barring fences in front yards. Fences to be wrought iron not over four feet in height. I Page 3 P & Z Minutes Ie January 26, 1989 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Change wórding - Accessory building not to exceed ten foot eave height. Chairman Schwinger stated there were no dramatic changes, just ascetics. Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to please come forward. Charles Parish, 715 Barbara Lane, Keller, came forward. He stated he is a Home Builder with offices located at 5505 Davis Boulevard. Mr. Parish said he is confused as to why these changes. He said some cities are real strict, some are lax, but North Richland Hills is the middle of the road on restrictions. Mr. Parish said he felt the present restrictions are sufficient. He asked if the side yard change was requested by the fire department or some other enity. David Barfield said it was to gain access to the back yard. He said we have continual problems trying to keep cars off the street. He said he did not feel it would make a major problem for builders. Mr. Parish said this would not stop the problem. He said you did not say you can't have trees or other obstruction in this area. Mr. Parish said with a 70 foot lot and take away 16 feet for side yards would require narrow houses. Mr. Parish said coming from Keller, we want houses to look larger, not skinnier. He said you are telling the builders you want narrower houses. David Barfield said some have said that North Richland Hills has too many small houses. He said we are no Colleyville. He asked Mr. Parish how can we encourage the builders to build I Page 4 P & Z Minutes Ie January 26, 1989 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I nicer houses. He said if we require side or rear entry garages, it would look nicer. He asked how could we up grade the city. Mr. Barfield stated he felt we should already have enough small lots already zoned in areas not developed. He said he felt we need to have something nicer, now. Mr. Parish stated he doesn't consider 2,000 and 2,200 square foot houses with front entry garages as trashy. He said he builds in Meadowview Estates. He said he thinks zoning is a way to build larger houses. Charles Scoma, 8300 Cardinal Lane, came forward. He stated he had prepared a hand-out package for the Commission and he has a slide presentation. Mr. Scoma read a letter to the Commission: "Dear Members of the P & Z Commission: On behalf of an organization known as Citizens for North Richland Hills, we wish to express our appreciation for the time and efforts you devote to the City of North Richland Hills to help make our city a better place to live. In recent weeks you developed a list of concerns and recommendations which have been expressed over the past years by concerned citizens of NRH. You are to be commended for your willingness to breach the potentially controversial subject of zoning ordinance revisions. We have prepared for your consideration the attached document which outlines our response to the proposed P & Z changes along with our rationale and recommendation. We will be happy to discuss any part of this document with you in detail should you so desire. Sincerely, Charles Scoma." I Page 5 P & Z Minutes Ie January 26, 1989 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Mr. Scoma stated he was a developer for many years and he does not want to demean the developer. Mr. Scoma stated there is a need for a definition for "greenbelt". He suggested "A belt of landscaping bordering property designed to prevent undesirable encroachments and enhances the aesthetics of the property." Mr. Scoma, for R-l zoning, showed slides for side and rear entry garages. He said you needed 1,134 square feet for additional parkway or turn around area. He said which had you rather have, turf or concrete. Mr. Scoma said the Commission recommends 6 foot side yard on one side and 10 feet on the other side, but we recommend 15 feet on one side and 10 feet on the other. He said at least we will have 25 feet on one side between the houses for landscaping. Mr. Scoma also stated they recommend increasing the lot size from 13,000 square feet to 14,000 square feet. Mr. Scoma said for R-2, they recommend to increase the side yards to 10 feet and 15 feet; increase the lot size from 9,000 to 11,000 square feet. Mr. Scoma said for R-3, they feel this classification should be kept. He said the average house is $85,000, and the average age is 28 years old. He said R-3 will continue to be important. He said the Citizens for NRH recommends you increase the side yard from 6 feet on each side to 12 feet on the drive side and 6 feet on the other side and allow only side or rear entry garages; increase the lot size from 7,500 square feet to 9,000 square feet; and the minimum house size remain at 1,400 square feet. I Page 6 P & Z Minutes Ie January 26, 1989 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I David Barfield asked Mr. Scoma if he had looked at the amount of lots there are already zoned R-3. He said there is more than enough. Mr. Scoma said with the Grandfather Clause of two years, he feels it is important to keep the R-3 zoning. Mr. Tucker stated if the property is zoned and platted, it would stay R-3, but if it was only zoned, it would be good for only 2 years. David Barfield said the majority of the cities only have one zoning classification with a minimum of 1,400 square foot houses, but they work with the developers. Mr. Scoma said he could see no reason why anyone would not want to build in North Richland Hills. He said when jobs are here, streets are here, water and sewer are here, they will build. He said you have to set the standards. Mr. Scoma said for duplexes, they recommend increasing the size from 1,000 square feet to 1,200 square feet; allow only side or rear entry covered parking; increase the lot size from 3,500 to 4,500 square feet. Mr. Scoma said for R-1-S, since this zoning classification specifically deals with the keeping of livestock in a residential setting, we believe certain modifications should be considered. They recommend they have a minimum of 50% in pasture land and "feed lots" should be prohibited under this classification. He said they also recommend a house size of 1,600 square feet. Mr. Scoma said they concur with P & Z to delete the R-5-D duplex zoning. I Page 7 P & Z Minutes Ie January 26, 1989 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Mr. Scoma said for R-6-T Townhouse zoning, they recommend increasing the lot width from 20 to 30 feet; have 15 foot side yard for rear and side parking; increase the living area from 1,000 to 1,200 square feet; and increase the lot size from 3,000 to 3,500 square feet. Mr. Scoma said they also recommend they be required to have 20% rear yard. Mr. Scoma said for R-B zoning, they recommend they increase side yard from 6 feet to 10 feet; increase the lot size from 4,000 square feet to 5,000 square feet; and increase the lot width from 40 feet to 50 feet. Mr. Scoma said for Multi-Family, they should have a greenbelt with a minimum of 25 feet in the front and rear; increase the side building line from 15 feet to 25 feet; recommend no parking in landscaped area; and allow only side or rear parking. Mr. Scoma said they recommend that R-I-S, R-4-SD, and AG Districts be given set backs and limitations. Mr. Scoma said they would suggest that in Industrial, Commercial, and Office zoning to change the acceptable south pressure level for different times of day. He said you need to look to see if the commercial area backs up to residential. He said they also are asking for greenbelts in these classifications. Mr. Scoma said some times in these areas there are trucks that back up to the back property line to turn around. Mr. Scoma said the Association wanted him to address the buffers as greenbelts, and they think sidewalks should be required in every subdivision. Chairman Schwinger thanked Mr. Scoma for his effort. I Page 8 p & Z Minutes Ie January 26, 1989 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Mr. Lueck asked Mr. Scoma where he got the figure 28 years old. Mr. Scoma said it came from an Urban Study done last year. He said the mix would be an average of 28 to 28 1/2 years old. He said they have to have a place to start. Mr. Lueck said it looks like Mr. Scoma is requesting R-1 to be Super R-1, R-2 to be R-l, and R-3 to be R-2. Mr. Scoma said not necessarily. He said it takes so much for side and rear entry garages and you would have concrete instead of a green area. Mr. Lueck said Mr. Scoma's definition of a buffer is different from his. Mr. Scoma said a greenbelt is more desirable. Mr. Lueck said he thinks of a block of houses as a buffer. Mr. Bowen said it is a transition area. Mr. Tucker said it is transitional zoning. Mr. Bowen said he was of the op1n10n that R-I-S was to have the same minimums and setbacks as R-l. Mr. Tucker said that was the intension, but it did not get put in. Kathy Robinson, 6463 Chilton Drive, came forward. She stated she is the Chairman of the Beautification Committee. Ms. Robinson said there needs to be a definition of landscaping. She read from the dictionary. She said she would like to see more green areas to draw more people to North Richland Hills. I Page 9 p & Z Minutes January 26, 1989 Ie I RECESS Chairman Schwinger called a recess at 8: 35 P. ~1. I BACK TO ORDER Chairman Schwinger called tIle meeting back to order with the same members present at 8:40 P. M. I I John Barfield, 416 Lovella, Hurst, TX, came forward. He stated he is a builder and developer. He said he knew the developer who built Thornberry in Colleyville and for 3 years nothing happened; then it turned around and was a success. Mr. Barfield said Colleyville has their problems, too. He said trends come and go; he said we need to have an overall mix of zonings. Mr. Barfield said if you increase the lot sizes, it would cost more and we would have to pass the increase on to the customer. I I I Ie Mr. John Barfield said the developer will go where the people are buying. He said if you require side or rear entry garages, you would have to have 30 feet. He said the lots would have to be 80 feet wide. Mr. Barfield said he likes to put side or rear entry garages "if he wants to". I I I Mr. Tucker said these recommendations are from the Commission, not from the City Staff. He said the garage can be open to the street, but in the rear. I Mr. John Barfield said it could be a detached garage. I Mr. Tucker said it could be. He said this would give more parking. I Mr. John Barfield said if R-3 zoning is a buffer, he has a piece of R-3 and a lady has about a 30 foot strip of AG next to it, then there is more R-3. He asked could she get R-3 there. Ie I Mr. Tucker said he felt like she could. I I Page 10 P & Z Minutes Ie January 26, 1989 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Mr. Lueck asked Mr. Barfield which would sell better, houses with rear or side entry garages or front garages. Mr. John Barfield said he knew the rear or side entry garages would be more expensive. Mr. Lueck asked Mr. Barfield if he would be able to sell them at the price needed. Mr. John Barfield said Fox and Jacobs prefers R-3. He said they have some R-3 and R-2 next to his R-1. He said they were interested in purchasing some of the land, but they would not consider R-l. He said they might consider R-2. Mr. Barfield said people now are looking for smaller lots and larger houses. Matt Speight, Bedford, came forward. He said he builds 2,200 to 2,600 square foot houses with front garages. He said people are more concerned with the size of the house than they are the garage. He said such additions as Meadow Lakes became desirable because of what is around it, the golf course and lakes. David Barfield asked Mr. Speight what his suggestion would be to get cars off the street. Mr. Speight said you have a 2 car garage plus 2 places to park. He said the main problem is most people use their garage for storage. He said he feels you should upgrade the houses and not worry about the parking. Mr. Bowen said there is a city ordinance against parking on the street at night. He said it is not enforced. I Page 11 P & Z Minutes Ie January 26, 1989 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I J. B. Sandlin, 405 Wood brier .Court, Bedford, came forward. He said he has been building in North Richland Hills for many years. He said he does not see anything wrong with ~orth Richland Hills, he thinks it is a fine city. Mr. Sandlin said he also builds in Colleyville. He said there is a very limited demand for houses and lots in Colleyville. He said he is building $130,000 to $150,000 houses with front garages. He said if it is the right location, they will sell. Mr. Sandlin said he plans to build 500 houses this year in Tarrant County. Mr. Sandlin said that Bedford and Hurst do not have all these requirements. He said we are having a real problem with people being against the Birdville School District. He said they want to be in HEB School District. Mr. Sandlin said what the Commission has recommended, R-l is okay; R-2, he is opposed to the rear or side entry garages and the 10 foot and 6 foot side yards, you haven't solved the problem. Mr. Sandlin said he has no problem with the minimum size of the houses; he said most of his are 2,000 to 2,200 square feet. Mr. Sandlin said R-3, we need affordable houses. He said he would hope the Commission would not zone out our children, the firemen, and city people. Mr. Sandlin said sidewalks are nice, but expensive. Alice Scoma, 8300 Cardinal Lane, came forward. She said Mr. Barfield and Mr. Sandlin both said that North Richland Hills is a wonderful city, but neither of them live here. She said she used to live in the same area as Mr. Tucker, which is a very nice neighborhood. She said when you have a lovely home in a desirable I Page 12 p & Z Minutes Ie January 26, 1989 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I neighborhood with rear entry garages, it will sell right away. Ms. Scoma said the problem with Birdville School District, they have many minorities in the western area. She said there are Asian children who cannot speak English who have to take those Team Tests; then the School gets a low rating. Mr. Parish asked if he could speak again. He said you are going to have street parking regardless if you have a front, side or rear entry garage. Mr. Sandlin came forward. He said he wants to make it clear that he was not critizing Birdville School District. He said he loves BISD, but people will request other schools. Mr. Sandlin said BISD is lax on Public Relations. David Barfield said we have problems with subdivision fences, the ones the developer puts up and only lasts until the last lot is sold. He said he felt the control of the fences should be in the ordinance. He said if it were built to code, it would last 25 years. David Barfield said there should be a way to build 50% masonary with glass, etc. He said they might consider a I-lot PUD or they might could go to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Mr. Bowen said this Commission takes no issue pertaining to the school. Mr. Bowen said in all residential uses we have conditional uses such as churches. He said he feels that churches should be required to rezone to a "u" classification so people in the neighborhood will have a say in what goes in next to them. I Page 13 P & Z Minutes January 26, 1989 Ie I I Mr. Wood stated he had a call from Dr. Tom Duer who was unable to attend, but wanted to say he supports the rear and side entry garages. I I Mr. Sanford said in regard to the one lot PD, he feels we do not need to start that, we do not need one lot subdivisions. I Mr. Lueck asked David Barfield about the fences he was speaking of. I David Barfield said they are common throughout the city. He said if they would build the base according to code, they would last for many years. I Ie Chairman Schwinger closed the Public Hearing. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:25 P. M. I Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission I I Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I I I Ie I I I Ie I I I I ORDINANCE NO. 1636 Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council for amendments of Ordinance #1080, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, by adding or changing the following: DEFINITIONS I I I Ie I I I TRANSITION ZONE - Transition zone includes a maximum of two (2) streets and four (4) rows of houses platted to the parameters outlined in the City of North Richland Hills Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision regulations. SECTION IV R-1 - SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT 4.5.3 (b) Minimum side building line: There shall be side building lines of 10 feet on one side and 6 feet on the other side. (c) Delete last sentence. 4.5.9 Garage requirement: Only side entry, rear entry or front entry garages set back 30 feet off the building line shall be allowed. SECTION V R-2 - SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT 5.5.3 (b) Minimum side building line: There shall be side building lines of 10 feet on one side and 6 feet on the other side. I I I Ie I I (c) Delete last sentence. 5.5.9 Garage requirement: only side entry, rear entry or front entry garages set back 30 feet off the building line shall be allowed. SECTION VI R-3 - SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT 6.1 PURPOSE R-3 shall be allowed only as a Transition Zone. 6.5.3 (c) Delete last sentence. I Page 2 Ie I I 7.5.3 I SECTION VII R-4-SD - SEPARATE OWNERSHIP DUPLEX DISTRICT Minimum dwelling unit size: Every dwelling unit hereafter erected, reconstructed, or altered in this district shall have a floor area of at least one thousand-two hundred (1,200) square feet per living unit exclusive of breezeways, basements, open and enclosed porches, common corridors, parking area, garages and accessory building. I 7.5.4 (c) Delete last sentence. I SECTION VIlA R-1-S SPECIAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT I 7A.5.2 (b)Minimum side building line: There shall be side building lines of 10 feet on one side and 6 feet on the other side. I Ie 7A.5.9 I I I I 9.4.2 I 9.4.3 I Ie I I (c)Delete last sentence. Garage requirement: Only side entry, rear entry, or front entry garages set back 30 feet off the building line shall be allowed. SECTION VIII R-5-D - DUPLEX DISTRICT Delete from the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION IX TOWNHOUSE DISTRICT Delete Garden house use from the District. (b) Minimum lot width: Every lot within the R-6-T district shall be at least thirty (30) feet in width measured at the front building line. Minimum dwelling unit size: Every dwelling unit hereafter erected, reconstructed, or altered in this district shall have a floor area of at least one thousand-two hundred (1,200) square feet for each living unit exclusive of breezeways, basements, open and enclosed porches, common corridors, parking area, garages and accessory buildings. I Page 3 Ie I SECTION IXA R-8 - ZERO LOT LINE DISTRICT I 9A.1 (Add another paragraph) R-8 shall be allowed only as a Transition Zone. 9A.5.4 (c)Delete last sentence. I I SECTION XIII C-l COMMERCIAL DISTRICT I 13.3.1 (a)Minimum area: Every parcel of land within this district, or the combined acreage of contiguously zoned parcels, shall be at least one (1) acre in area. I SECTION XIV C-2 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT I Ie 14.3.1 (a) Minimum area: Every parcel of land within this district, or the combined acreage of contiguously zoned parcels, shall be at least one (1) acre in area. SECTION XVI I-I LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT I 16.3.1 (a)Minimum area: Every parcel of land within this district, or the combined acreage of contiguously zoned parcels, shall be at least two (2) acres in area. I SECTION XVII 1-2 MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT I 17.3.1 (a)Minimum area: Every parcel of land within this district, or the combined acreage of contiguously zoned parcels, shall be at least two (2) acres in area. I SECTION XXIV SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS I 24.2 MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZE: Every dwelling unit hereafter erected, reconstructed or altered in R-1, R-2 or R-3 residential districts shall have a minimum floor area as follows: R-1 and R-I-S 2,000 square feet, R-2 1,800 square feet, and R-3 and AG 1,400 square feet exclusive of breezeways, basements, open and closed porches, common corridors, parking areas, garages and accessory buildings. The ground floor of the residence shall be at least 2/3 of the required size. I Ie I I I Page 4 Ie I I I I I I I I~ I I I I I I I- I I 24.7.1 DEFINITIONS PORTABLE ACCESSORY BUILDING is any structure that meets the following criteria: (i) does not exceed two hundred (200) square feet in total area; (ii) does not exceed ten feet (10) eave height. 24.13.4 (b) (delete paragraph and add:) Non-sight barring fences may be allowed in front yards. Such fences are to be wrought iron and not over 4 feet in height excluding the posts and the posts may be masonry. 24.19 MODEL HOMES Model homes are allowed in residential districts with the restriction that the garages be returned to their original state and two covered and two off-street parking spaces are provided before a certificate of occupancy shall be issued. 24.20 RODEO TYPE ACTIVITIES Rodeo type activities are allowed only on lots/tracts containing more than five (5) acres. 24.21 SIDEWALKS Sidewalks shall be required on public streets in all districts, with the exception of AG Agriculture. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1989. ~ ~~ ~ Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF , 1989. ATTEST: Mayor City Secretary City Attorney · ~-, , - y -_.,-", "- -. "'T'" I' I I~ Economic Development/Planning "epartment: ~ Subject: ~ I I I ~ I No one was present to speak against the zoning request and the Planning and Zoning ~ Commission approved the rezoning by a 6-0 vote. Ie I I I ~ , '·1 I ¡i~ 1:1 I I o~ W. ~'t__ (it~) ~ 1<11; ~ ~.~ Department Head Signa~;;y COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee of Oak 10/9/89 Council Meeting Date: PZ 89-16 Agenda Number: and 19R thru classifications Duplex to R-2 the north side of Hills Joint Venture to rezone Lots BR, 12R, 37R, Oak Hills Addition, from their present of 0-1 Office and R-4-SD Separate Ownership Single Family. This property is located on Meandering Drive. Public Hearing. Ordinance No. 1637 The Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing at their September 14, 1989 meeting to discuss this rezoning. Doug Long was present to speak for the joint venture. Mr. Long stated they felt it would be advantageous to the neighborhood to rezone the lots from multi-family (duplex) to single family residential. The lots across the street are zoned R-3, however, the builders are building homes with more square footage than required and are having success selling them. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council hold the required Public Hearing and the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. consider Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of C-I I}c~~ --.J .....! PI:JU~ IJJ rn~~~t: ?~F ~ I ' ! J~. '~_.::~~ ~_ lJ:œ:IJ ct f I I ~ _ ~L ~ :: J~-' .-. ,., If Il i-!,.-..- ,-, 1"1 ~ 18 ~ ~ l r j ~~~ ..I. C-2 ::A;::ll::li;~~ - ~~ = l..'~Y' ~~~ ~ ~= .-.... = .. ~ I" I L --=:u.L..~ 11 I~I- ..... _ _ 1IJr-n 1f ~ - ~~-I.~~ ~~~; := =-~: " n-- ~..........("" ~ ... C-I ~ ~ I' _ ~r.:~ ~ -J ~;J - L ~ C-I k- I ~~ =1 ~ _ 00 ...!!:!::- .., · _ I-- ~ .n '-----0, '):; I lO~.s f I 1 -'J 'R-3- rF. ~~E ~y Ej _ - N.::..J.lJ 2000 .... .., , I >:õ.¢ ~ -/~ 1 I~~i .....- ;::;:: T ~ \.J ~ . r,f. - '- :;;r " Ë Ñ-"'- , I · ,-!C :: 7ìØl-n ~~ ~ J~' ~ __~ ~;l ~ 'n/i~I-,~ -(\~~ _ '\. 1~ ,- ' f.' '~7l~-~ R-t : ~'11 ~ :fI~ ~ I ~ rD53 f I /n I. :;rr ~~.. ~ Ì:: R-~ !::!- 1 ~ r:..R·l- ~ -3 ::: Ull~ AG '= ___I- l.w.r-o~~.tïi ~ ~~ f450 .411 .....- IIIll1liL-Æ;i f-- ~~..Wllif \ I ~f*~=-- ~;I~ /' ~" 1- AG ~~C-I §t~~ ~J!. ffii-.{ AG r l~_ JI:-':;I ~~ ~~- s' ~ ....p¿ B'-U- .~;r -LJ:aJ "'-4--11 II Ifn ~'~\2'~ TT 0-1 + I\-:~~I> 1õ :: ~~Ht¡y ~rl; ....'...,.......... ~;ïl1Jlt;ia:o ~~ .. 1fI ~ru,~]\ ~~~~~ _ ,,~ -- ~ ~ - r- L - 1 LI1 ~~ ~ ~(A~ I' æ !!~ =>-B~ ~ ~= :: II!.!.~ -==- IT n.." 1 ' J~:.;. ~ /~i- >-1 ~~ k¡;;'~ LJ L >- If-3 1600 ~ ~L :::~=-:~~~ -~ r \ \ \ r~2' J r- ~ì~~..~ '/ rl ì :::~ ~r c- C-I r Rr~ ~ R-21;J~OO ~~ it \t-....:; ~-C-J-- I_~ "-.L \~ r~ .". T..A' : II~ ~_. ~" '= ,tJ nn\JL__ _v) 1 ~ AG l "111\'" rrr I 'f R-3- ~I - ~ - ." - '~ I'...~..l ~r. C-I 1600, t:.... J,...J. ;~ ~ c, '" ~~~ ~;H!(II ~ I 1171 -., 'Y ~ R.2 R-2 R-2 r~ TT' ~ ~~ t:_ ~ n '" - R-I ~ '114" Iln I Œ LV) . ,. I!.e ~ ..~ .rr¡~ M= I~ ~.......... ..¥,. --- ~' ~f," .' ~ I "- Iii~'i ,. I J¡: I - = -!¡¡f¡I~~1-- AG -~ ,..¡t: _ ~I_ ~ ~-2 A In'", - - 'jIII::.ro]'~ d '7~"" r--t,~! a~!!::: ~n 1-2 ..~~ ~è 1\\ ~ ~31 " t)~ ~I ª~~i~~ ll'7 1491 .. ~'V I V ~ 1'-1 ,,' _"'..... ~ ~~ I . \\ ~ La. Jf.l ~,\-~ U ,...;~ .1'<1.'1 I 'It u· ~ ~ J II 'f \I I I '-~ -+-t 1 , 11 , ~ ~~ 't~ F- \\ 1 I \ - -...... I..., _ R-7-M F '~---../'"~[l'~ C Ì\" 1- / \L.....=>-NJ t::ID-í1 R 1"'1 t' I: l~ ~ ~ I......... = V'S l ID.l - >- I'f::>-~: -.~~ ~f~ ~V'R-2 · ~ ..-- -.. ~~~~i~,:::::- ~~F~ :: ~~ A-G ~'v ~ r ~."..,..... >-1....·) I- !).(- '" I I J T f..... .. Ir ~-~' I I ,í "7 I \.I"'~ -2 ~o'" 00" -1tl: ~ r, 1}1' "u.J IU...... ~~. I.. UI o(.c;..~ ::11 ~ ~ ~ ~ _.l I I I I to- ..1 t"... = · ~ t1J~ ~-c;¡ .- --, ~ tV~'-""- ~~ I I ¡ ..¡¡'Ii .... ..,. LO ",1Is'l '-..., I .......~ ::: .~ - -'~ I J\IMo. ..Ie.. ICMOOL ~ ~ --wi ..I: ~ f ~'t(-2 ..,.. . ,0+'" - - j~] I"""'" ::: -- ::: 1 _::: ......- ._ I C-2 fIG R-2-J r, I [~,~f ~ .~~~ ~I R-I ~ + '~ ~ ~ >->- r<- 111 ) 17 ¡. N.. ~I ~ ~ I' Aß 'AG " I 'r ð " r.r: I ~ ~·I I A-I 1Þ!4/ ~ ~ -: r . I, , " ._- = ... .. ¡ - - C-I f'" ~- - ......-- - AG - 1 ~ r ilK-... r-- ~ R-3 I<*) ~ ~:~ + I' Page 2 Ie P & Z Minutes September 14, 1989 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I PZ 89-1 APPROVED I 2. PZ 89-16 I Ie I I Mr. Barfield stated that on "fences front yards", it should read a ma of 4 feet high excluding the po and that the posts may be mas rye Ms. Calvert asked if the intends for the classi R-1-S Single Family stipulations as R- mmission ation of have the same ingle Family. Mr. Wood s ted an additional wording added in Commercial and Indus 1al zoning. He said in C-I and equires 1 acre of land to request a oning change, and I-I and 1-2 equires 2 acres. He said it should be added that it could be less where a parcel of land is contiguous with like zoning. Mr. Lueck said in each residential classification, to delete the last sentence of (c) of Building line requirements in R-l, R-I-S, R-2, R-3, R-4-SD, and R-8 zoning classifications. Mr. Barfield said it should be stated that swimming pools should be no closer to utilities than allowed by code. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve and recommend forwarding all changes and amendments to the City Council for approval. This motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the motion carried 6-0. Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee of Oak Hills Joint Venture, to rezone Lots BR, 12R, & 19R thru 37R, Block 7, Oak Hills Addition, from their present classifications of 0-1 Office and R-4-SD Separate Ownership Duplex to R-2 Single Family. This property is located on the north side of Meandering Drive. I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Page 3 p & Z Minutes September 14, 1989 PZ 89-16 APPROVED 3. PS 89-19 Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. o. D. Long, Consulting Engineer and part owner, came forward. He stated they are requesting single family lots. He said they feel this would enhance the neighborhood. Chairman Schwinger called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PZ 89-16. This motion was seconded by David Barfield and the motion carried 6-0. Request of John W. Barfield, Trustee for preliminary plat of Thornbrid Addition. O.D. Long, Consulting En · eer, came forward. He stated t Mr. Sandlin, a partner in the V ure, is also present. Mr. Long ated they are requesting they allowed to deviate from the en · eer's letter. He said item 82 garding a concrete channel on the north, the property to the north is presently zoned R-4-SD, but plans are to come in for Commercial zoning; therefore their plans are not to construct a concrete channel or storm sewer system until the commercial property is planned or developed. Mr. Long stated they feel there will not be any need for the concrete channel. He said there is a pipeline there and would probably be put in parking lot. He said they would landscape the area between the residential and I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I '.j  ~., D ô.. KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas August 28, 1989 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 89-16 REVIEY LETTER, ZONING FROM '0-1 & R-4-SD' TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 71 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~~~.~~ SUSAN L. SCHVINGER, G.C.~. RWA/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. C.A. Sanford, Assistant City Manager Mr. Bob Miller, Director of Economic Development/Planning Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Zoning Review PZ 89-16 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I ORDINANCE NO.. 1637 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-89-16 the following described property shall be rezoned from 0-1 and R-4-SD to R-2. BEING Lots B-R, 12R-A & B, and 19R-A & B thru 37R-A & B, Block 7, Oak Hills Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-183, Page 94, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located on the north side of Meandering Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1989. a/7 ,/,/ /? , ~¡:~ l---' ._-_ "/'/I~· / ~~~ ;~;;;;;i/;'~SSION SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-89-16 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL ITY: ATTORNEY I I I I I ~I ~I \1 ···,··'.··.~.·.·.I ':" e ,,····.'.········.··'.·.·····.1 " t···.·,.·.,·.·.1 ." :*,1 ~:I i.·.....·.·.....'.............'.....1 ... .. ffl ¡il :1 I I . '0;'" ,,',," .'.n CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS epartment: POLICE Council Meeting Date: 10-9-89 - --- - ------ Subject: MULTI-AGENCY TASK FORCE AGREEMENT GN89-131 Agenda Number: Since 1984 the City of North Richland Hills has participated in a special eleven person, seven-agency Task Force funded totally (except for employee salary) by the Fort Worth office of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) which is responsible for its execution. This contract, with a new drug-free workplace agreement, must now be renewed if we are to remain in this program. The new federal requirement of certifying a "drug free work place" is met by North Richland Hills management policy number CMA-OOOS titled physical examination and drug screening of applicants/employees and by civil service rule #10 titled Separation and Disciplinary Action. This Task Force only addresses major traffickers in narcotics and seizes, as a result of their investigations, specific drug related assets. This Task Force assembled the case that broke-up the largest Heroin/Cocaine distributing network in Tarrant County last year by securing a life-without-parole sentence for the King-Pin Billy Ray Maddox and appropriate sentences for his major cohorts. This is the same group that executed the seizure's funneling $800,000 to local agencies last year. We supplied one of the eleven agents that produced these arrests. This is a significant piece of the puzzle in successfully combating drugs. Recommendation: That agreement be approved and the City Manager be authorized to sign on behalf of the City of North Richland Hills ensuring we continue in the Task Force. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Opera · udget Othe Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available f21 I City anager . Finance Director 'ar ment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Pace 1 of l- Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I DEA/FORT WORTH MULTI-AGENCY TASK FORCE AGREEMENT .Jhis agreement is made this day of , 1989 between the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and the Drug Enforcement Administration hereinafter called DEA. WHEREAS there is evidence that trafficking in narcotics and dangerous drugs exists in the City of North Richland Hills area and that such illegal activity has a substantial and detrimental effect on the health and general welfare of the people of the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant 'County, the parties hereto agree to the following: 1. The DEA/Fort Worth Multi-Agency Task Force will perform the activities and duties described below: a. Disrupt the illicit drug traffic in the greater Tarrant County Metropolitan area by immobilizing targeted violators and trafficking organizations. b. Gather and report intelligence data relating to the trafficking in narcotics and dangerous drugs; and c. Conduct undercover operations where appropriate and engage in such other traditional methods of investigation in order that the Task Force's activities result in effective prosecution before the courts of the United States and the District Courts of the State of Texas. 2. To accomplish the above, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas agrees to assign one (1) experienced narcotics I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Page Two officer, or an officer with at least two years general experience, fu 11 time, to the DEA Fort Worth Multi-Agency Task Force for a period of not less than two years. During this period of assignment, the Officer assigned wi 11 be under the direct daily supervision of DEA personnel and will follow DEA policies, procedures, and guidelines. Specifically, all ta~k force personnel will adhere to DEA regulations concerning conduct, DEA property, reporting systems, evidence handling, use of firearms, informants, technical equipment, official funds, official vehicles, arrest, search and seizure. 3. The City of North Richland Hills Police Officer assigned to the Task Force shall adhere to a 11 DEA policies and procedures. Failure to adhere to DEA policies and procedures shall be grounds for dismissal from the Task Force. 4. The North Richland Hills Police Officer assigned to the DEA Fort ~~orth Multi-Agency Task Force s hall be deputized as a Task Force Officer of the Drug Enforcement Administration and wi 11 be authorized to exercise the powers of enforcement personnel set forth in 21 use 878. 5. To accomplish the stated objectives of the DEA Fort Worth Multi-Agency Task Force, the DEA will assign the appropriate number of special agents to the Task Force and provide the necessary funds and equipment to support the activities of the officers assigned to the Task Force. This I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I II I I Ie I I Page Three support includes office space, overtime payments described below, one vehicle per officer, office supplies, travel funds, funds for the purchase of evidence and information, funds for clerical support, vehicle maintenance, investigative equipment, training and other support items as approved by the Special Agent in Charge of the DEA, Dallas Field Division Office. 6. During the period of assignment to the DEA Fort Worth Multi-Agency Task Force, the City of North Richland Hills will remain responsible for establishing the salary and benefits, including overtime of the North Richland Hills Officer assigned to the Task Force, and for making all payments due them. DEA will, sUbject to availability of funds, reimburse the City of North Richland Hills for overtime payments made by it to the Officer assigned to the Task Force for overtime, up to a sum equivalent to 25% of the salary of a G5-10, Step 1, Federal employee (currently $26,261.00) or $6,565.25 per year, or $1,641.31 per quarter. 7. In no event will the City of North Richland Hills charge any indirect cost rate to DEA for the administration or implementation of this agreement during the term thereof. 8. The City of North Richland Hills shall maintain on a current basis complete and accurate records and accounts of all obligations and expenditures of funds under this agreement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and instructions provided by DEA to facilitate on-site inspection I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Page Four and auditing of such records and accounts. 9. The City of North Richland Hill shall permit and have readily available for examination and auditing by DEA, the United States Department of Justice or the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of the duly authorized agents and representatives, any and all records, documents, accounts, invoices, receipts, or expenditures relating to this agreement. In addition, the City of North Richland Hills will maintain all such foregoing reports and records until all audits and examinations are completed and resolved, for a period of three (3) years after termination of this agreement, whichever is sooner. 10. The City of North Richland Hills will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1954 and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to the regulations of the Department of Justice (28 CFR, Part 42, Subparts C and D) issued pursuant to color, creed, sex, age or national origin and equal employment opportunities. 11. The City of North Richland Hills agrees that an authorized officer or employee will execute and return to DEA the attached OJP Form 4061/2, Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters. The City of North Richland Hills acknowledges that this agreement will not take effect and no Federal funds will be awarded to the City of North I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I Page Five R;chland Hills by DEA until the completed certification is received. ,12. The City of North Richland Hills agrees that an authorized officer or employee will execute and return to DEA the attached OJP Form 4061/3, Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace Requirements. The City of North Richland Hills acknow'ledges that this agreement will not take effect and no Federal Funds will be awarded to the City of North Richland Hills until the completed certification is received. 13. When issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid solicitations, and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with Federal money, the City of North Richland Hills shall clearly state: a. The percentage of the total cost of the program or project which will be financed with Federal money and; b. The dollar amount of Federal funds for the project or program. 14. The term of this agreement shall be from October 1, 1989 to September 30, 1990. This agreement may be terminated by either party for good cause shown by notice in writing given to the other party thirty (30) days prior thereof. Billing shall be received by DEA on all obligations that are outstanding on the above prescribed termination date within 90 days thereof. I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I ,I I I Ie I I Page Six DEA will only be liable for obligations incurred by the DEA/Fort Worth Multi-Agency Task Force during the term of this agreement. FOR THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION: BY: Phillip E. Jordan Special Agent in Charge Date FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS: BY: Date I ~. ....." . · Ie I I' I I I I I lie I I ,I I I I Ie I I '~ u.s. Dë'p~~o' f,· ~~~~Rt~#~, ," . . :nt~~r'!J=~' ., il,l" . . · . . .' 4"~~'·2~~_~~.:·,~·fI,;;'~~'i" "~~-'" ,..; Office of J usUce ProgramS. ,~;: ~.(,,:p..,'~:.;.. :, ~. ~~~.' . ;. ;~...)...' . ",',' ,0,. .,:,~' "'~: . n'\:: ~~; 'f~!if~~::' :~ :!;r::::~ .!. ~::{;, : ':,: ~~\E::'./ .: ;t< '···'1 ~!i!l.;.(t;~""X...;"...,. ~j . U'),. tb..;.,· ;,;':( ':~{ ~~~." i' . . , Hluhington. D.C 20531 I.. MAR 1 5 1989 TO: Discretionary Grant/Cooperative Agreement Recipients nOH: Jack A. Nadol A.-. /- ~ ~ß Comptroller ~ -, Office of Justice Programs SUBJECT: Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace Requirements As of March 18, 1989, for all new or supplemental awards, it will be necessary that Office of Justice Programs (OJP) grantees submit to us a Certification Relardini Druc-Free YorkDlace Requirements which meets the requirements of the Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D), as set forth in the enclosed copy of the Tuesday, January 31, 1989, edition of the Federal Relister. (Because of changes to the third column of page 4948 and the first column of page 4929, I have included substitute pages 4947 through 4950.) Also, enclosed 1s a copy of the certification form. The information requested in item II of the form includes locations where your agency performs the grant management activities necessary to the administration of the grant program. For most grantees, the address will be that of Y01.1r agency only. Some grantees, however, have the grant function spread out between two or more separate and distinct locations. In those cases, the address of each separate building (street address) 1s required. It is essential that we receive your completed certification form as soon as possible. No grant will be awarded until we receive the completed certification form. The certifications may be telefaxed to me at (202) 724-6956 and then the original should be mailed to the Office of the Comptroller, ATTN: Control Desk, Office of Justice Programs, 633 Indiana Avenue, N. W., Room 942, Washington, D. c. 20531. .~ . I'~ .... Ie / u.s. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS OFFICE OF THE.COMPTROLLER . . Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace Requirements Grantees Other Than Individuals I I I I I I e I (e) This certification is required by the regulations Implementing the Drug·Free Workplace Act of 1988, 28 CFR Part 67, ' Subpart F. The regulations, published In the January 31, 1989 Federal Register, require certification by grantees, prior to award, that they will maintain a drug·free workplace. The certification set out below Is a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the agency determines to award the grant. False certification or violation of the certification shall be grounds for suspension of payments, suspension or termination of grants, or governmentwlde suspension or debarment (see 28 CFR Part 67, Sections 67.615 and 67.620). The grantee certifies that It will provide a drug·free workplace by: (a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance Is prohibited In the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; (b) Establishing a drug-free awareness program to Inform employees about- (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace: (2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace: (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs: and (4) The penalties that may be Imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring In the workplace; (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged In the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); (d) Notifying the employee In the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employe8 will- . (1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (2) Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring In the workplace no later than five days after such conviction; Notifying the agency within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction; (f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted- (1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination; or (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; (g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug·free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (1). I I I I I I Place(s) of Performance: The grantee shall Insert In the space provided below the slte(s) for the performance of work done In connection with the specific grant (street address, city. county, state, zip code): Organization Name Application Number I Name and Title of Authorized Representative .gnature I I Date OJP FORM .061/3 (2/8~) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Police 10-9-89 Council Meeting Date: Subject: Extension of AA Wrecker Service Company Towing Contract Agenda Number: GN89-133 Bids were taken in early 1989 for the city vehicle towing contract, and the City Council awarded a 1 year contract to "AA Wrecker Service Company". This company has provided excellent service over the past seven months. The Police Department is presently discussing with three neighboring cities' police chiefs the possibility of North Richland Hills handling storage of their impounded vehicles. It would facilitate these discussions to have our towing contract established for an extended period of time. It is requested that the one year contract with "AA" be extended for two additional years. Recommendation: Extend the "AA Wrecker Service Company" contract expiration date from February 28, 1990 to February 28, 1992. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other./7 _ ""7 J /1 (ú ~ !:J{~~ /< :;/ ~~. / )6epartment Head Signature ' City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY 0 F NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration e"l M I 10/9/89 ouncl eetlng Date: GN 89-134 Agenda Number: Subject: Appointment to Civil Service Commission The appointment for Place 2 on the Civil Service Commission expired on October 1, 1989. This appointment was mistakenly left off of the September 25, 1989 agenda. Ms. Janet Hankammer has been nominated to be reappointed to this place for a one year term. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make an appointment to Place 2 on the Civil Service Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget Other '/ 7: ¡ I Finance Director ,\ /r" /IIJ '_"'" .~ ~. -~- A,;·) / ,- I' Z L- ¿/ \... ./·w<-. ~ /.' i· {. ,.{ ¿u _/ C ,?~ {. GL- <oj __/.' , . ," - ~ ,. /.' Department Head Signature City Manager :../ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I~ ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 10/9/89 Nomination of Representative to Bnard of Directors Subject: Tarrant Appraisal District - Resolution No. 89-43 AgendaNumber:GN 89-135 The attached resolution was not distributed Thursday evening because there was some question about Mr. Norwood's eligibility to serve, and because he had not been contacted, to the best of our knowledge, to see if he was willing to serve. We have subsequently determined that he is both eligible and interested in being reappointed. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available 7q /J ( ~~'[~~ Department Head Signature Ity Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 11 11 Ie I I I I 1 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I RESOLUTION NO. 89-43 BE IT RESOLVED by the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1 . The City of North Richland Hills, Texas hereby nominates James K. Norwood for the position of Director of Tarrant Appraisal District. 2. The City Secretary is directed to forward a copy of this resolution to Tarrant Appraisal District, 2315 Gravel Road, Fort Worth, Texas 76118. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills this the 9th day of October, 1989. APPROVED: Tommy Brown - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire - Attorney for the City -1 >><-- , CITYOF NORTH RICHLANf) ,HILI¿.S, Department: . Adlllinistration. . '. .. . . .'. .' . ... .. CctunøU"'.t1noo.tt:lO/9189 Npvemöer 7~1989Election... MethódOf~e]eçtton . ..... Subject: for a Court ofR~()rd Judge ... OrdinancèNo~. ..1638 . ~N~t:6N8~...132 Ordinance No. 1638 calls for this é1ection to-behe.ld i'kC()njunctio"'tl;it~<ttleCounty election.. The proposed cons t i .tutional,amendments 'and!; the ·.Ci ~y' S . e leç't1()n""Jll b;eip1 aCèd on the.sameballgt and the City's \threepollingplaces willbe,'usedt~refore;ß,Jðkingit mor.econvenient for 'the citi~ens of North RichlandRiHs.. The c()ßJbininfjoftbeelection will ~sul t ina cost s.avings to the City. AC()PY.of~h.ball()t\ ,'sattAChêèJ.; Recommendation: It'i srecQlJlDen.Øed tha t Ci ty Counc 11 approve Ordf,na·rtcø No. 1638. Sourcftof' Funds: Bonds. cGO/Røv~)<, Operating Budget ~her (*<1~~~ /', .'. _\_'...._..~~.- ...... Finance ·.Revle. , .- -. . "-'" -.'. , Acct. Nuìnber'í "Sufflcl.tFunda AvaIlable Zl....... .... , .. '-Z' · '>," ... ~fÇIfl:._, '1t'-f: . . Finance Director I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I ~epartment: Subject: Economi c Deve 1 opment .Council Meeting Date: 10/9/89 Authorization for Letting Contracts for Constructlon of Parking Lot and Drives at Iron Horse Golf Course Agenda Number: GN 89-136 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The parking lot and drives for Iron Horse Golf Course are to be included with the club house and this project is to be bid on November 7, 1989. Contract is scheduled to be awarded on November 20, 1989 and construction to begin on November 30, 1989 with a project completion date of May 15, 1990. Recent plans for overseeding of the golf course could allow for the opening prior to the parking lot completion by 45 days. The staff and ad hoc committee have met and discussed splitting out the parking lot and drives from the club house package and constructing these items on an emergency basis. There are several advantages, some of which are: early revenues from play, lower construction cost, paving of parking lot and service road at the same time. Recommendation: The staff and ad hoc committee recommend that the City Council authorize splitting out of parking lot and drives into separate bid from the club house project on an emergency basis. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available (~/ ~1 .---r / . -/ ,-:' G(-? V Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM '., Finance Director - /¡,~ Pa e 1 of 1 · I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works 10/9/89 Council Meeting Date: Department: Subject: Mîscellaneous Drainage Projects/Willowcrest/ Wc~dcll!Tcurict Drive Agenda Number: PW 89-36 Based on a recœmendation of the CIP Conmittee, the City Council approved a budget for the Willowcrest/Wendell/Tourist Drive Drainage Improve.rænt Project on August 4, 1989. The staff was directed to negotiate an agreerœnt f()r engineering services wi th Albert HaIff and Associates. Negotiations have been successful and an agreed price not to exceed $19, 740 is recœmended. Recorrmendation: It is recœmended that the City Council approve the attached contract for engineering services with Albert HaIff and Associates and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Oth r Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available dlr /'7 . / / j (J Jil,~t ~'-\ , I Finance Director e t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I , AGREEMENT FOR ENGrnEERING SERVICES This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 1989, by and bebveen the CITY OF NORTH RICHIAND HILLS hereinafter called the CMNER or City, acting by and through its authorized to act and Albert H. Haltî ASSOclates, Inc. , a corporation hereinafter called the ENGINEER. This AGREEMENT is applicable to the furnishing £ Basic and Special Engineering Se:rvices by ENGThTEER for WILLOVJCREST /WENDELL/TOURIST DRIVE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS as provided in Section III following. Such improvenents are hereinafter referred to as the "project" which is located in the City of ~rth Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and identified by number NRH 89-5. CONTRAcrtJAL UNDERTAKINGS SECTION I :rnpLOYMENT OF ENGINEER The CWNER agrees to employ the ENGINEER and the ENGrnEER agrees to fmnish engineering services as stated in Section II following, and for having rendered such services the ~ agrees to pay to the ENGINEER canpensation as stated in Section VI following. SECI'ION II CHARACTER AND EXTENT OF SERVICES The Basic Engineering Services to l:e rendered by Engineer are to l:e considered distinguishable fran other services and shall be perfonned as required during the following phases of each project: A. PRELIMINARY B. DESIGN C. CONSTRUcrrON In addition to the Basic Services, other services related to the project that nay l:e included by specific authorization are identified herein as liD. SPECIAL SERVICES. I' These various se:rvices are hereinafter more fully described as follows: A. PRELIMINARY PHASE 1. Attend prel±minary·conference with CWNER regarding the project. 2 · Prepare a prel±minary engineering study and report on the project in sufficient detail to indicate clearly the problems involved and the alternate solutions available to the OWNER, to include preliminary layouts, sketches and cost estimates for the project, and to set forth clearly the ENGINEER'S ~ecammendations. 1 I Ie I I :1 I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I 3. Furnish the OWNER all necessary copies of the preliminary report, includinq preliminary layouts, sketches and cost estimates. All reports in excess of 30 copies are to be paid for separately as provided hereinafter. 4 · Inform any utility canpanies that may be affected by the project so they may start planning to avoid conflict. B. DESIQ1 PFASE 1. Establish the scope and advise the OWNER, of any soil, foundation, or other subsurface investigations or any special surveys or special testing which, in the opinion of the ENGINEER, may be required for the proper execution of the project. Assist the OWNER in arranging for the conduct of such investigations and tests · (The performance of these investigations and tests is not a part of the ENGINEER'S Basic Services and will not be included unless specifically authorized in writing under "D. SPECIAL SERVICES" following.) 2. Fun1ish to the CMNER, \mere required by the circumstances of the assignment, the engineering data necessary for applications for routine permits by local, state, and federal authorities. 3 · Perform field surveys to collect information on surficial topographic features, which in the opinion of the ENGINEER, is required in the design of the project. 4 · Develop the project design caobining the application of sound engineering principles and econany which shall be Inanifested by canpleted Construction Contract Docu1œnts, (Plans, Specifications, etc.) and assist CWNER with subni ttal of such DocuIœnts to local, state and federal agencies for approval as may be applicable. 5. Prepare detailed cost estimates identifiable with the proposals of authorized cori~truction, which shall include sumnaries of bid items and quantities on the unit price system of bidding wherever practical. The ENGINEER shall not be required to guarantee the accuracy of these estima.tes. 6. The ENGINEER shall secure the approval of the CWNER of final plans and specifications. -Evidence of such approval shall be the signatures of authorized OWNER officials inscribed on the plans. All Contract Dcx:::urœnts shall canply in all 2 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I res¡:ects vlith all applicable local, state and federal laws and with all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by all local, state and national 1:oaràs, bureaus and agencies. Approval by the CWNER shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the ENGINEER, its officers, agents, employees and subcontractors for the accuracy and competency of the services perfonœd hereunder, including but not limited to designs, working drawings and srecifications or other engineering docurænts. Such approval shall not be deerred to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the {J;VNER, for -n.y error, anission, defect or negligence in the rerformance of sucn services, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the CMNER signifies the CMNER' S approval of only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. 8 · Furnish to the CMNER all necessary copies of approved Construction Contract Documents (plans, specifications, notice to bidders, proposals, etc.). All sets of Construction Contract Documents in excess of 30 are to be paid for separately as pro,\rided hereinafter. 9 · Provide a set of approved plans and srecifications to each concerned utility ccropany with a proposed construction start date. c. CDNSTRtK:TION PHASE 1. Assist the CMNER in the advertiserœnt of the project for bids. 2 · Assist the OWNER in the opening and tabulation of bids for construction of project and reccmnend to the CMNER as to the proper action on all proposals received. 3 · Assist in the preparation of fonnal Contract Docmœnts and in coordinating their execution by the respective parties. 4. Review any project Trench Safety Plan su1:mitted by the Contractor and provide recommendation as to the Plan's completeness. 5 · Represent the CMNER in the Non-Resident administration of the project. In this capacity, the ENGINEER shall have the authority to exercise whatever rights the CMNER may have to disapprove ~rk and materials that fail to conform to the Contract Documents when such failures are brought to the ENGINEER'S attention. (This function of .ENGINEER shall not be constructed as supervision of the project and does not include on-site activities other than occasional site visits to observe overall project conditions or when specifically requested by OWNER to visit on-site for a particular matter. It particularly does not involve exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the work or material; nor does it place any responsibility on ENGINEER for the techniques '"and sequences of construction or the safety precautions incident thereto, and he will not be responsible or liable in any degree for the Contractor's failure to perform the construction work in accordance with the Contract DocuIœnts . ) 3 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I 6. Consult and aaV1se the OWNER; issue such instructions to the Contractor as in the judgment of the ENGINEER are necessary; and prepare routine change orders as required. 7 · Review samples, catalog data, schedules, shop drawings, laboratory, shop and mill tests of naterial and equipœnt and other data which the Contractor is required to sul:mit, only for conformance '-lith the design concept of the project and compliance with the infonnation given by the Contract Documents; and assemble written guarantees which are required by the Contract Dcx:rnnents. 8. Prepare or review rronthly and final estimates for payrœnts to Contractors, and furnish to the OWNER any necessary certifications as to payrœnts to Contractors and Suppliers. 9 · Conduct, in canpany with a-JNER, a final inspection of the project for conformance with the design concept of the project and canpliance with the Contract Dcx:rnnents, and approve in wri ting final payment to the Contractors. 10. Revise contract drawings, with the assistance of the Resident Proj~ct Representative to reflect available information as to how the VK)rk was constructed. Furnish a set of prints of these revised drawings to the OWNER in the fom of reprcducible mylars so noted as "REVISED PER CONSTRDCrION INFORMATION" with a revision date shown. Also provide a full set of revised drawings to the Œ1NER in the fonn of 35nm microfilm on labled aperture cards. D. spæIAL SERVICES Various services incidental to the project, but not within the scope of the Basic Engineering covered by A. B. & C. preceding, which may be perforrœd or arranged for separately by a-JNER, or nay be added to the ENGINEER'S resJ?Onsibili ties by mutual agreetrent and written authorization include but are not necessarily limited to the following: 1. Furnish the services of a Resident Project Representative for continuous on-the-site observations of construction. The authority and duties of such Resident Project Representatives are limi ted to examining the material furnished and observing the ~rk done, and to reJ?Orting their findings to the ENGINEER. The ENGINEER will use the usual degree of care and prudent judgment in the selection of competent Resident Project Representatives, and the ENGINEER will use diligence to see that said Representatives are on the job to perform their required duties. It is agreed, however, that the ENGINEER does not underwri te, guarantee or insure th~ ~rk done by the Contractors, and since · it is the Contractor I s reSJ?Onsibili ty to perfonn the \VOrk in accordance with the Contract Documents, the ENGINEER is not responsible or liable for the Contractor's 4 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I failure to do so, and so long as the ENGINEER has exercised the usual degree or care and prudent judgment in selecting said Resident Representatives and has used diligence to see that they are on the job to perfonn the work, failure by any Resident Project P~presentative or other personnel engaged in on-the-site observation to discover defects or deficiencies in the ~rk of the Contractors shall never relieve the Contractors for liability therefore or subject the lliGINEER to any liabili ty for any such .:iefect or deficiencies. 2. Furnish construction layout, and provide other special field surveys not provided for elsewhere in this AGREEMENT. 3 · Ap~ances before regulatory agencies. 4. Assistance to the CWNER as an expert witness in any litigation with third parties, arising fram the developœnt or construction of the project. 5. Special investigations involving detailed consideration of operation, maintenance and overhead expenses: preparation of rate schedules: preparation of special reports as required for marketing bonds: earnings and expense statements: special feasibility studies: appraisals: valuations: and material audits or inventories required for certification of force account construction perfonœd by the CMNER. 6. Detailed mill, shop and/or laOOratory inspection of materials or equipœnt. 7 · Soil and foundation investigations, including test borings, soil tests and analyses of test results. 8. Extra travel required of the ENGINEER in connection with the project, other than trips between ENGINEER'S office and the project. 9 · Additional copies of reports and Contract Documents in excess of 30 as required for the ini tiation , bidding and administration of the project. 10. Preparation of applications and supporting documents for government grants or planning advances for public works projects. 11. Revision of reports and Contract Docurœnts after specific approval by OWNER. SECTION III AUTHORIZATION OF SERVICES No professional services of any nature shall be undertaken by the ENGINEER under the agreerœnt until he has received written authorization fram the CWNER. 5 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I sEcrroN IV PERIOD OF SERVICE This AGREEMENT shall be effective upon execution by the CWNER and the ENGINEER, and shall remain in force until tenninated under the provisions hereinafter provided in Section IX or the work is completed. SEcrION V COORDnmTION WITH THE OWNER The ENGINEER shall hold periodic conferences with the CWNER, or j_ts representatives, to the end that the project, as perfected, shall have full benefit of the CMNER'S EXPERIENCE AND KNavLEDGE OF EXISTING NEEDS AND FACILITIES, AND BE CONSISTENT WITH ITS CURRENT POLICIES AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS · To implement this coordination, the CMNER shall make available to the ENGINEER for use in planning the project, all existing plans, naps, field notes, statistics, canputations and other data in his possession relative to existing facilities and to the project. SECTION VI THE ENGINEERS I CCMPENSATION For and in consideration of the services to be rendered by the ENGINEER, the CMNER shall pay, and the ENGINEER shall receive the catlpeI1sation hereinafter set forth for the PRELIMINARY, DESIGN and CONSTRUCI'ION Phases of the work and additionally for SPECIAL SERVICES that are in addition to the Basic Services. All remittances by CWNER of such canpen.sation shall either be mailed or delivered to the ENGINEER'S hare office as identified in the work authorization. "Construction Cost" as used herein is defined as the total cost to the a-JNER for the execution of the work authorized at one tiIœ and handled in each separate phase of engineering services, excluding fees or other cost for engineering and legal services, the cost of land, rights-of-way, legal and administrative expenses: but- including the direct cost to the CMNER of all construction contracts, i terns of construction, including labor, materials and equipnent required for the canpleted work (including extras) and the total value at site of project of all labor, naterials, and equipnent purchased or furnished directly by the OWNER for the project. "Salary Cost" used herein is defined as the cost of salaries of engineers, draftsmen, stenographers, surveyrren, clerks, laborers, etc., for tiIœ directly chargeable to the project plus social securi ty contributions, unerrq:>loyment, excise and payroll taxes, employrrent ccrnpensation insurance, retirerœnt benefits, rœdical and insurånce benefi ts, sick leave, vacation, and holiday pay applicable thereto. A. Compensation for the Basic Engineering Services (PRELIMINARY, DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION phases) on work covered by any given written authorization shall be Salary cost times a multiplier of.2.25 and direct non-labor expense at internal office cost plus a 10 percent service charge. Subcontract expense under Basic Engineering Services shall be compensated at invoice cost plus a 10 percent service charge. 6 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I B. Total payment for the combined ~IC SERVICES as described in Section II, A., B., & C. shall not exceed $ 19 ,740 which is the maximum COMBINED BASIC CHARGE . The PRELll1INARY phase portion of the Basic Service shall be no greater than 10% of the COMBINED BASIC CHARGE; the DESIGN phase portion of the Basic Service shall be no greater than 75% of the COMBINED BASIC CHARGE; and the CONSTRUcrION phase portion of the Basic Services shall 1:e no greater than 15% of the COMBINED BASIC CHARGE. Payment for the PRELIMINARY phase portion of the Basic Services shall te due within 30 days after suhnission and acceptance by the CMNER of the Preliminary Report, or other applicable sketches, estimates, etc. Payment for the DESIGN phase portion of the Basic Service shall te due in monthly installments. The rronthly installments shall be rrade upon receipt of an invoice fran the ENGINEER outlining the arrcunt of hours worked by each employee and the employee's salary rate along with itemized charges for any subcontract, reproduction and survey work perfonœd during the period covered by said invoice. Payment for the CONSTRUCTION phase of the Basic Service shall be due in monthly installments. c. Canpensation for the services covered by any given written authorization issued pursuant to Section III may te fixed by mutual agreerœnt of ENGINEER and ~ and supercede other provisions herein when so stated in said written authorization and endorsed by authorized representatives of both parties · In the absence of such endorsed stateIœnt of mutual agreerænt to the contrary, the provisions herein for can¡;:ensation shall govern for all services furnished under this agreerænt. D. Compensation for SPECIAL SERVICES not covered by the PRELIMINARY, DESIGN and CONSTRUcrION phases of Basic Services provided hereinabove shall te as follows: For all of ENGINEER'S personnel tiIre applied to the SPECIAL SERVICES, "Salary cost" tiIres a multiplier of 2.25. For all direct non-labor expense, including mileage, travel, and living expenses, the charge for these services will be at internal office cost plus a 10 percent service charge. The avNER shall can¡;:ensate the ENGINEER for furnishing field survey ~rk as requested for "construction layout" at the rate of $ 67 . 72 per hour for a three ( 3 ) man survey party and $ 86. 31 per [leur for a four ( 4) man party. The rates for survey work are- pot subject to the salary cost-multiplier fonnula. 7 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Payments to the ENGTIæER for authorized SPECIAL SERVICES will be due rronthly, upon presentation of rronthly statements by the ENGINEER for such services. Nothing contained in this agreement shall require ~ to pay for any work which is unsatisfactory as reasonably determined by the Director of Public Works/Utilities or which is not sul::Initted in ccmpliance with the tenns of this Contract. CWNER shall not be required to make any payments to the ENGINEER when the ENGINEER is in default under this Contract; nor shall this paragraph consti tute a waiver of any right, at law or in equity, which CMNER may have if the Engineer is in default, including the right to bring legal action for damages or for specific performance of this Contract. SECTION VII CWNERSHIP OF OCCUMENTS All infm:11lation and other data given to, prepared, or assembled by ENGINEER under this Contract, and other related i terns shall becaæ the sole property of CWNER and shall be delivered to ~, without restriction on future use. ENGINEER may make copies of any and all docurœnts and i terns for its files. A set of mylar reproducible plans shall be filed with the CWNER prior to final payment. ENGINEER shall have no liability for changes made to or use of the drawings, specifications, and other docurænts by anyone subsequent to the completion of the Project. CMNER shall require that any such change or other use shall be sealed by the ENGINEER making that change or use and shall be appropriately marked to reflect what was changed or ncdified. SECTION IX TERMINATION Either party to this AGREEMENT may terminate the AGRE»ŒNT by gi ving to other 7 days notice in writing. Upon delivery of such notice by the ~ to the ENGINEER, the ENGINEER shall'discontinue all services in connection with the performance of this AGRE»ŒNT and shall proceed to cancel prcmptl y all existing orders and contracts insofar as such orders or contracts are chargeable to this AGREEMENT. As soon as practicable after receipt of notice of termination, the ENGINEER shall sul:mi t a statement, showing in detail the services perforrœd under this AGREEMENT to the date of termination. The ~ shall then pay the ENGINEER pranptly that proportion of the prescribed charges which the services actually perforrœd under this AGRE»ŒNT bear to the total services called for under this AGREEMENT less such payrœnts on account of the charges as have been previously made. Copies of. all canpleted or partially cœq:>leted designs, plans and specifications prepared under this AGRE»ŒNT shall be delivered to the CWNER when and if this AGRE»ŒNT IS TERMINATED. Should City subsequently contract with a new consultant for continuation of services on the Project, ENGINEER shall cooperate in providing infonnation. The ENGINEER, during the constmction of said project and for a ten (1) year period thereafter, as prescribed· by Article 5536a of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, shall indenmify and hold hannless and defend the CWNER, its 8 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I officers, agents and/or employees fram any loss, damages, liability or expense on account of damage to pro~rty and/or injuries (including death) to any person or persons, including officers, employees or agents of the ENGINEER, which are proximately caused by any negligent error, omission, defect, or deficiency in the performance of the ENGINEER'S professional services or in the preparation of designs, \,¡orking drawings, specifications or other engineering dOCUIœnts incor'p:)rated into any improvements constructed in accordance herewith. The ENGINEER shall defend at its own expense any suit or other proceedings brought against the OWNER or its officer~. agents or employees on account thereof and shall pay all expenses and satis.::::y all judgments which may be incurred by or rendered against the OWNER or its officers, agents or employees in connection herewith; providing and except, however, that this indemni ty provision shall not be construed as requiring the ENGINEER to indemnify or hold hannless the ŒJNER, its officers, agents, or employees from loss, damages, liability or expense on account of defects or deficiencies in design cri teria and information furnished to the ENGINEER by the ŒJNER and which the ENGINEER could not discover by the exercise of reasonable diligence, or deviations by the contractor in construction from ENGINEER'S designs, working drawings, specifications or other engineering docurœnts, except such deviations as might occur with the approval of the ENGINEER or during the performance of ~ over which the ENGINEER has supervision. services SECTION XI SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNMENTS The OWNER and the ENGINEER each binds himself and his successors, executors, administrators and assigns to any other party of this AGREEMENT and to the successors, executors, administrators and assigns of such other party, in respect to all covenants of this AGREEMENT. Except as above, neither the CMNER nor the ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or transfer his interest in this AGREEMENT without the wri tten consent of the other. Nothing herein shall be consti tuted as creating any personal liability on the part of any officer or agent of any public txXiy which may be a party thereto. SECTION XII \7ENUE Venue of any suit or cause of action under this contract shall lie in Tarrant County, Texas. SECTION XIII SPECIAL CONDITIONS A. AMENDMENTS This AGREEMENT may be amended or supplemented only by written instrurœnt and only as approved by resolution of City Council or the Ci ty Manager, except as identified in Section IX, TElMINATION and for minor changes which do not change the scope and intent of the original agreerænt. M:i,nor changes shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/Uti'lities. 9 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I B. LEGAL CONSTRUcrION In case anyone or IrOre of the provisions contained in this AGREEMENT shall for any reason œ held to œ invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any rest:ect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions thereof; and this AGREEMENT shall œ considered as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never œen contained in this Contract. C. PUBLISHED MATERIAL ENGINEER agrees that the CWNER shall review and approve any written material about OWNER projects and/or activities prior to œing published by the ENGINEER. D. COMPLETION SæEDULE The services fw:nished by the ENGINEER under this AGREEMENT will 1:e canpleted in accordance wi th the following: For the pur¡;oses of this AGREEMENT, a Ironth is defined as thirty (30) calendar days and a \\7eek as seven (7) calendar days. If any of the following sul:missions fall on a CWNER non~rking day, then the sul:mission shall 1:e due the following CWNER working day. Preliminary' Study and Report to 1:e delivered to the OWNER for review within three (3) weeks of the date "Notice to Proceed" is received. Construction Plans and to be delivered to the OWNER for review within five (5) weeks of the date of CWNER review and approval of the Preliminary Study and Report. Contract DocUIrents to be delivered to the OWNER on or before a date one (1) week following the City review and approval of the Construction Plans. E. NarICES All notices, ccmmmications, and reports required or t:enni tted under this Contract shall be personally delivered or mailed to the respective parties by depositing the sane in the United States Mail at the address shown 1:elow unless and until either party is otherwise notified in writing by the other party at the following addresses. Mailed notices shall 1:e deaœd ccmnunicated after five (5) days. 10 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I If intended for NRH, to: If intended for Engineer, to: Gregorv ft.]. Dickens Contact Person Troy Lynn Lovell Contact Person Director of Public \~rks/Utilities Title Vice President Title City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 817/281-0041 Albert H. Halff Assoèiates, Inc. Finn Name 4000-Fossil Creek Blvd. Address Fort Worth, Texas 76137 City, State, Zip Code 817-847~1422 Telephone F . INDEPENDENT CONTRACIDR In ¡;erfonning se:rvices under this AGREEMENT, ENGINEER is ¡;erforming services of the type ¡;erforrœd prior to this AGREEMENT; and ENGINEER by the execution of this AGREEMENr does not change the independent status of the ENGINEER. No tenn, or provision hereof, or act of ENGINEER in the ¡;erformance of this AGREEMENT shall be construed as making ENGINEER the agent, servant, or employee of the CMNER. G. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE Prior to the time ENGINEER is entitled to comœnce any part of the services tmder this AGREEMENT, ENGINEER shall procure, pay for, and maintain professional liability insurance written by cc:mpanies licensed in the State of Texas or meeting surplus lines requirements of Texas law and acceptable to the CMNER. The insurance shall be evidenced by delivery to OWNER of a certified copy of each policy, including all endorsements. The insurance requirements shall remain in effect throughout the teDtl of this AGREEMENT. The professional liabili ty insurance shall be in the minimum arrcunt of $250,000. H. RIGHT OF REVIEW . Engineer agrees that CWNER may review any and all of the work ¡;erfor:rned by ENGINEER tmder this AGREEMENT. CWNER is hereby granted the right to audit, at CMNER'S election, all of the consultant's records and billings related to the ¡;erformance of this AGREEMENT. ENGINEER agrees to retain such records for a minimum of three (3) years following canpletion of thi-g AGREEMENT. 11 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I . CONFLIcr OF INTEREST No officer or employee shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in any contract vii th the Ci ty or be financially interested, directly, in the sale to the City of any land, materials, supplies, or services, except on behalf of the City as an officer or employee. Any violation of this section shall constitute malfeasance in office, and any officer or employee guilty thereof shall thereby forfeit his office or PJsition with the City. Any violation of this section with knowledge, expressed or implied, of the person or corporation contracting with the City shall render the AGREEMENT involved voidable by the City Manager or the City Council. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have executed this a.greement in triplicate originals on this date, the day of 1989. CITY OF NORTH RICHIAND HILLS ENGINEER: By: Title Title: Vice President ATI'EST: Address: 4000 Fossil Creek Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas City, State, Zip Code: 76137 Ci ty SecretaIy Phone: 817-847-1422 APPROVAL RæOMMENDED: ATI'EST : ~ JiI- j Secretary FORM AND LEGALITY: ,/ Attorney Date: 12 ;'''''l'''"'Zê,,':":''I "',"<"'~" "",.......'.' ',"~'''' I I I I I I I I I I I I I i<1 :1 :;1 :i~1 ). I i~l· _.-:~ Department: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Wbrks/Utilities 10/9/89 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PW 89-37 Subject: Award of Bid On Miscellaneous 1989 Water Line RQplãc8m8nts As previously presented to the Council, the subject operating budget project included the following improvements. 1. Stonybrooke Drive 8" water line from Hightower Drive to Rumfield Road. 2 . Main Street 8 II water line fran Walkers Branch to Crane Road. 3 . Riddle Drive 6" water line from Main Street to Sinmons Road. 4 . Chil ton Drive 6" water line fran Main Street to Royal Oaks Drive. 5. Redondo Street 6" water line fran Marilyn lane to Corona Street. 6 · ýJcxx1dale Dri ve 6" water line fran Whispering lane to Cha¡:man Drive. Bids were received on this project September 28, 1989 and the low bidders are shown below. Bidders Amount Calendar Days Bid Time Atkins Bros. Equiprent Circle C Construction Hydro Utility $ 247,084.00 302,603.00 343,955.75 180 150 140 Funding Source Sufficient funds were previously approved by City Council and the proposed contract may be expensed to Account Number 02-86-10-6700. Recœmendation The staff reconmends award of the project to Atkins Bros. Equiprent Co. in the amount of $247,084 for a period of 180 calendar days. Finance Review ßt=t= Al.uve Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other GO Acct. Number S~UffiCi Funds Available ~~-- ..( .." Ið ./ ~---.,.""""" ~ ~ ~ ,Finance Director /7 I!' 11? >- ¡dJ! K · ( . /t'I/'~; 'City MaZ;er CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Pa e 1 of 1 ¡.J -- ~' ~"~(Jj_ _ ¿//, j::. - > ~, '. ~ -. ----y-< ._~~. ",_ J/~l~ ~.-:: ~ =-4'-: ',--., ,,-:::' ---:f=--jl . - . .-,. ~... . ' ----. --"f -~- - ,,-',- _! - .. -&-~.~- ~ ' ~~!$~ ~1!1 _"~ "" ,......./12 ~ - _.l - L ; . -i -+-: r- "", --- -~~'I -1; ~ I l ~?~ ¡ - "-, '"".... I I I L r·---- - -- I \(;.. --'Ill . :cl( . i ¡ ~ ~ Ii; . I i I IJ If I'IL- I I' t I ~ I- I " 1 u Z IE ~: þo. I I I --.J I I I %' 1/// L I If/XÝ L~- ß' , I ~ .-- /' ~---#' /:. '0 ,. ,. ,'. / \~ /'. ". /' ,>'" .,.., ,~Q)'" /~-~ ~ ..~ ';'. I I : .~ .:1 ¡ ! ,,,' /' //~!I ~ /:, '\ ,',,/ î I ! \ -l ...'.......10. 0.'''. ~ -- -- ~ICHlA"O I _ ~-- ~1 ~--.~ i ./" I HIGH SCHOOL LooP 820 ! ~~~ t.j,,; qr 'I T - I ~il ~::--: ' ~: ! -~/ [-) ~ I I I ~~ - ~ I I' ¡ 1 ~ T _ r 1 ~ ~. I ~ , hJ:::~1 L '--Il-' 1 J ~ ~m ~ '~I'; -~ ~ 1 ~ II ¡ II '~. -Z ~ .cl-:.N ~~ìl~ ~7Iif¡¡rm J~ -;::::~ ~$ " ~ g ~ ~ .., 1 :, 7 ~ L1 !:¡-il -iJ:LL _--- "4 ,l " ~ >-- I 'ur-. n 'I- T r - >-- ~ (" I "'. '. ~..'\. .:: , :=l'v=.:h-V .. , , , Î I I-I'~n J=~I j~ 1 I \ ~ '--:::~µ"T \ ...; ,.'\. ~>-- ~ ~~¡.¿ x= I I I I I I I I ~þJ . 0, r l.\i T :::R '(" J r ..,.00. .. " ::::::--. =~~o "\ I fI'<= U ~ F::J~ - ,n i :::= == ~r-¡ j\. -.... ~ I~ ::: ::::::: >-- .. ¿,r¡-::. "·ON'S... _ H ' '< f-- I-- s=7 NO'U'" ItICHlA"fO [ I- ~ J 1 - ,j]'; ( ,. I ~/ -- T 1l~.....--., >-- /"\ T 1\ì .uo·o. "c. ".OOL.. I I~ _.-. H \ ' " · ~ ~ - - - '-'D::'..... H I \~§= ; 1111 - ll/(/:IN:'(:'n ;~ ¡RiTl -'.' ( ,'rl I~J (II 1fT '" ~~ tE±ffi:ÊR~~l--~ ìr"' -. 1fi III.~. 11 \ \ ~\ I/ìr,ïl",", :~~fr¡~·¡:,¡~~~ ~~~: :: ~!=~: ::..coff - I ì I\KR~l r~ , I I ¡ ,i ; E:~: ::; UillllilJJJE, I I ¡ J i R'-- e-- ~ ~:=~~ r I ¡ H I 1. I fA (~. · ). I '1 II I r LJ~~ '::, ~ t::~ I I Ty I i [ ì' í ¡ r T T 1 r 1: . __ ~ ·c:: - t::f I I r 1 T f I I r r 1 ~ ==-~ - - . , I I . r I I '¡ 1_ - '. _. n r ï! I r I' _ ." . / 1 J W ill ( 1- ~~-", 1J='-f'h! I,' I.- I IFf '" .r iT.1JIIH! , I, ¡ I ~ nr.'";l RPTrTTìTTìI -c." .. . '6 I 'i 1;[ , ! " T 'I ¡ I ¡ LLU.l..i.J.J.J. _ . t=VJTl \ I ¡ . r CIJ l . I:t[ , .,' '-I , ' " ~ -". i . 1 \ ~¡ r r r t~ :: ! -- ~ § ~ .I ~ r (~~ I ',\. .~ :. ~ ' T J.-, ::-~; : ¡ " T , Ti ~ " == . 'I ., I \ ' '. r. . t9 .- "m I . - \ \ " "' \~~, >< :5!( ~A=c . :~~~[[:[OO)~[ - ~. ~ "~J!'" ":,.~ I~ \, '" 1 I -w-:=t: [-[... '. ~ '-'~ '~\ " . ' " ~ ,.-----'-- ·c~\ ' - ~ , ,'\, -~. : ¡ r- H -,-" ~ , . ~' t::::::::: ,.,_[ ,Ji/I4.-/~ L----.J t:::::2:::::;: H / /'" ~ I ~.' ~~µ ~~-F~.§=:. Iso! M=",r.~_ 'JU:::: ~ Jäcf[ ~~-- - i,~·::-' -: I S § ~L.!...:§::}--- I 'I 1 ~--j , ~ I ¡-; - .. - r .. ~~ I~ ~\ 1~ -" ¡ ,'I~~ r \' t:::::J I-.-- I ¡ ; ¡ ~r-- -' ¡ '-.'-. ~~ ~ ___ ).-----'" ---- ~ '! I . ;..::¡ t- ¡ ~'.r- -~¡ - : i ~ _ ~'_. '.--' ~ ~: ,r------ _~: -- ~ </ \ \ y , -:/Ý \ "- ,\ .~ ','/. - I {~ ~ \ \. \. ,;:~ '...... ~ - ~-~ -- ; ~- r ; ~ ! ' ,/ '\ '~~~ =~=, :--:; ~~ t.i~.1 ~------ '- ~"""..'\.r- ,..:,.-- ~. ~ · ~.~ < U 'C"T ~( " , rJ~BEg~~~.. ~~~~~L.· [....~.. ~~ rnrnT=I~ ~::::::::::::::~~tl..,:;=:;~m~H~' ~- I~ 1JJ:Ir:I[ ~ t===;=~:'~" .~' "i~=-'; ..~.:, y' ;~~mn 11 11 fH8F£, lJ _ _ r-~ ,,/ ' ~--L' ~. _~.;4 -7 --p - . [] p == _._~ ~4 v' -: : .. 'W~1TI : : I ~HlŒmB:' +- , ,___~'-.J " ' ' ~ 'L': !' !~ ~ ILl ......._.--c .. ~ ?" IT~ / /~ ~.........l-1~~ I I r " ,-I ~~~__. . t: 111\ v,,;;¡;ITEr r ' " .iTTTT1,... :-:._ -:;::aIIIIIIJ' ~ 7, ¡ ¡ -- ' " §ill, '8" I 1CIJ:rrI: ~p= :::::: ::; I ' .. ' \::H (IT f~··~1 'J.......J:! ¡ ¡~ :?t~ ' ' , , f--- ~ ~ 8Hffij -..-, ~~.r-, ""r1"""'-t., ~. ' ' ~ ___ =:J c:= _ I;, EfEEHHHE¡ I I =_~ ~'!-"'- ; J HJl 1/\- I ~¡ : I~ _ _ ~ _ -V- : ' - >-J""'" .-. ." UilllllJ m.. ~. =f-o~{x'::?' ~ ~' ' ~EEHHEffijEP;W/.,' ..' ,~~ ¿..~I ,\, CO i! KITï"1 1-J 1:- II:T, R .' '. i . I ~ ~., ...... I I .\ ~ I D ~ ~ i ~.~ .. ~~ U >->- ~::: §:: :::~.... ..~ Þ-t--- ¿, ~;:':;:m±mf -+- ->-< ' I-- I--'-- .... .... . ~ mn::::t: - ---< - j t---~ '-- I- - :fJi'lL.¡ ~ .... .\0" ~gø' "g:¡ur I I T .=E:'* ~~ ::E Ë =w:rftffWln = ~ u:: ~ ur¡:C''LIJ:œ ~ ::+-1 __ == :± ~ '- ~ .'"OIW" ~ .... n w"'J. -t: ~ ~ I -0- t::1 ::J ..... s' · -\"'I" \a ....'-1 ~ ~ -I- -+- ~ -- I -i ~~.i Bffi"'" T·!: ::±:J E':' ¡:::= §!!!, -- - - I ~r := S· > I t' I-t-nl ""TJTlCD - ...~::1 :::: ~, , : i , ~ i 0::.- _ '-4 ...~ ~ ~ '--- - - i=\ -. ~Hr- I m1 ~ tiE r ~ Ëê ª =2~~ ~ ,¡-- ,=r£'- --y: -F " ' ;zè ~ lliIl, II ¡" ~-4WIJ §§ ~ ~ ê)F ¡ 6 ; ~ ê ,.._ t±:J ePdU' -- ~ == 6:l::J ~ ~ ê _ 1-1- I--~ t!= ~ ","--,--,~ ~ ~ pJ....r r- ¡¡: "I III" . Ë5.J i Sf: t=:Ë .-E ~ .,:::: =E .. · ¡'m t:"""""";:: J3 ' B.J=R.k=¡. - LL- ¡' ~'~i~~ -,8= t::t:::" ===- -~ t:; T,L:'"' -~"'t:~ -§i---= :::t;--:'"::.1=b8=--- -fJ ~" __;--' +-......L _ - ,-'- 'I ~"l' e (E!,. I /ltj ...J = - "-¡W~ .... t--- - .. .,'" "- . ~-----tL-~ '- J r--1 !'+ - -= I-- ... ~- ~ .fE' í[ ..:r= -, ¡.=Be= ~ e 1ET 'E~ ::r: =-:=¡ t:::t-~,j ~ I ~ ~~ '--! y.....tj tF . E >'f' r / " - J:: ::=:::::± ~ ::=r::-" :¡a ~ \€-~~~~:~ê:'~~-~~ _~~;~ ~~~ d' ~ 1- Q ¡-t I ~ 5 · ~T'" ~~ ~I - _ !'t=\~~~n~: S 'SBfIIT~·· ~~ ~ a~ EEl=¡ g-' - 0, ~'<Ç :~11 .. ,I ' III T-r-" 1mo _ ~ L 1L'trrIJ ::11: I W r\"ì ~t= I ~; ~œ~~1~~&œ1t ~~f~ -. 0~~ ~¡~;8~ ~ . I I nl ,~ ~~ru IJ IT \t±t=--tt -( FfHL7~~AU'A I JI ~ lil¡ -- (jZÏ m~lf.: - I ~ UiJL7 A- \ J' ~ I H ç..:tlrf"1 :-1 I \ -'-- j F. ~ __ T ':1[1 t ~ --c:::J - - 001.' -1:::j mII 1 r---1 :- " I ~I/ì- _ :1 - - I I ~ I I ./ C::" \' _!If:t1 ~ T"' I LFL- ...' ' ~ ......\ -Ll .. ~ hi · -r ~ ~. 0JJ¡~ _"2\ þ.- I l __ ~1I,." ' -1-: ~ /~ I ~. W1jH~¿' ~r=L. ~ Ë I ,'~ :Ë ('V I NI r!fï'tTÌ¡- ,- 1:: i :jjj Lt "L ~ll T -r," , ~. .:, ~ f1 -1 CIIIitÙ-r ~~JJ:!=1 ~\ ( ß< ~J.=rn F I '-<.J. '/:-" ' ,'.. , . ' \ - L I : '~~~~~.ill~1 ~ Ju~·+~u'¡rl--/~~~~.~' ~(,"~,~~, : S ,~~/tjt-:~fFlEæTI-r-;r ,_ ~!. - - ~ ' _rxn-- ,', ~"/' , , _ -4 ~ tif'tt) I I ! t I~ t ; ,0 .. il-Jt-tLL ' IT ,~ ~.' '.:-!.. 0..-' h n~1 __ , I ' ..[-:I\J.l ¡ .. - ~,I\~- ~... , I b L-.., '-ttt7t+ ll.l.! ~ ,.... ' -< 'ïf'r'1- ". · ' u.::r:;: I !YT . : = _>'¡,Þ.i ' I! TTìT ~b _ _, i~: ' ~ ~ · .µ.~~ 7J=j"éð""~ ~ . -~~" .---. QS- ~ ~..-' -;. t:: -;-0 LI:::. I --- ~ I T ~ .. ~ I ¡ II ' ' ~,- - ,--L ~ · 'r -' Q " " _ 1_=.... V~ ::::r:::: , I " .. ¡ .- "f:J · _ :'w - r- -~' ,', '-;-;-'f- DC .¡, ~~.~ - ..¡.. , -~I~Î~"'-~.!'-'~'µ~· ~.-~~II -- ;7 /"7"~,..., I ' i I . I , I I I I I I I ----~:~_.---' ~.~. . -- ",.~.-" -..",-..------- ~/ I Ir, Instructions for Certification 11e By signing and submlt::ng this proposal, the prospective lower tier parttci;ant 18 providing the rtlflcaUon set out below. 2. The certification °In this :!ause Is a material representation of fact upon whlcr: reliance was placed Ihen this transaction was en:øred Into. If It is later determined that the prospective :ower tier participant 'nowingly rendered an error:eous certification, In addition to other remedies available to the Federal ¡overnment. the department or agency with which this transacUon originated ~ay pursue available mediI., Including suspension and/or debarment. 3. The prospective lower tier Dartlclpant ~hall provide Immediate written notice to the per~on to which ~is proposal is submitted If at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that Ita certification ~as erroneous when 8ubmitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. .~..~..~~.~^:e.~m,~..~'~~~~~:~ "t~:~:~I~~,,"..:~:b_a...:e~~:._·~~~S~:~ded,:~ "1~e~~gi~le~" ~·!~~.er tIer covered fA u.s. CE,.ARTMENT 0' ...;USTICE O'~IC:E OF JUSTICE PR··:)GRAMS O~FICE OF THE COMPTROLLER ~..~ .~- ,~ 'th f 4 . ,. ,-: c-rtlflcatJon Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Lower Tier Covered Transactions (Sub-Recipient) ~ ,.... ,. E 6. j Ie rr tt rE This certification Is required by the regulations Implementing Executive Order 12549, Oebarment and Suspension, 28 CFR Part 87, Section 87.510, Participants' responsibilities. The regulations were øubli~hed 8S Part VII of the May 26. 1988 Federal Register (pages 19160-19211). : ~ " t (BEFORE COMPLET1NG CERTIFICATION, READ INSTRUCTIONS ON ·REVERSE) SI tc ,h8. (1) The prospective lower tIer partIcipant certlflel, by submission of this propolal, that nllther It nor Its o prlnclpåls are presentlY d'ebarred, suspended, prcPQled for debarment, declarvd Îr,eligible. Of vOlur1 tarlly excluded from participation In this transaction by any Federal department ar agency_ I~\ ,......___ ...._ ...A.....AA."'A '^Ulap tlar ",.r+i~l~tSr\t I. tin_hi" tn ~.rtlfv tð anv ðf th. .t.t.mA"t~ 1" thl~ ~.rtifl. I I -. I I I I I I I I~\ I I I I I I 14t I I October 2, 1989 MISC. 1989 VATER LINE REPLACEMENTS Page 2 in the water alternate bid. In the absence of any negative reports concerning the ~ow bidder, Atkins Bros., 918 Vest Harshall, Grand Prairie, Texas, 75051, we would recommend award to that company in the amount of $247,084.00 for a period of 180 Calendar Days. Ve will be present at the October 9, 1989, Council meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. <S'v.s.f\~ L, Sc. ~\J\v\ ~ SUSAN L. SCHVINGER, G.C.E. SLS/ss Enclosures cc: ~r. Dennis Horvath, Deputy City Manager ~Hr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Hr. Larry Jones, Owner's Project Representative