HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1988-02-22 Agendas
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 22, 1988 - 6:30 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 Northeast Loop 820.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1. GN 88-16 Approval and Passage of
Resolution No. 88-8 - Narcotics
Coordination Interlocal
Agreement (Agenda Item No. 10)
(5 Minutes)
2. PW 88-06 Award of Bid on Starnes Road
Paving and Drainage (Agenda Item
No. 11) (5 Minutes)
3. PW 88-08 Award of Bid on Hightower Drive
Paving and Drainage (Agenda Item
No. 13) (5 Minutes)
4. PW 88-07 Approval of 1988 Miscellaneous
Street Repairs PrOject (Agenda
Item No. 12) (5 Minutes)
5. Remodeling of City Hall (10
Minutes)
6.
Possible Work Session (5 Minutes)
a. Performance Evaluation and
Review of 1988 Objectives
b. Other
7.
Other Items
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
8.
*Executive Session (25 Minutes)
a. Personnel
b. Review of Progress on Land
Acquisition
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the
Open Meetings Law. If any action is
contemplated, it will be taken in open session.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 22, 1988
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda
for discussion and/or action.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Invocati on
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting February 8,
1988
5. Presentation of Proclamation Proclaiming
National Retail Bakers Week
6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent
Agenda
7. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk
(8, 9, 10, 11, 12, & 13)
* 8. GN 88-14 Proposed Amendment to Ordinance
No. 1489 - Ordinance No. 1527,
Establishing Food Inspection Fees
for Child Care Centers
* 9. GN 88-15 Authorization of Signatures for
Unmarked License Plates -
Resolution No. 88-6
I ·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*10. GN 88-16 Approval and Passage of
Resolution No. 88-8 - Narcotics
Coordination Interlocal Agreement
*11. PW 88-06 Award of Bid on Starnes Road
Paving and Drainage
*12. PW 88-07 Approval of 1988 Miscellaneous
Street Repairs Project
*13. PW 88-08 Award of Bid on Hightower Drive
Paving and Drainage
14. Citizens Presentations
15. Adjournment
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_: l..J..___~_..··._'",:.... .
',.' : ,. '- ,,"'. ...... . - -' .
...~;., . ....', ;..,", ..;.,;........, ..~~...... 4_ ..___... ___ ._...
City of J(ðrth Richland Hills, Texas
February 22, 1988
PUBLIC NOTICE
EMERGENCY ITEM ADDED TO THE FEBRUARY 22, 1988, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA.
13a. PU 88-13 . Emergency Purchase of 40 ton Air Conditioner
for Police Facilities,not to exceed $27,000
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 76118
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
No. IR ·88~Ol
\j~
c::::::::- )t
71f
Date:
February 18, 1988
Remodeling of City Hall
Subject:
As you know, the Police Department has recently completed the move into
its new facility. The staff has been working for several months on a
proposed floor plan to utilize the old police wing and to remodel part of
City Hall to provide additional administrative space, including the
Economic Development activities, Central Filing System, the Public Works
staff and a more convenient and effective location for all of our
"counter type" or citizen contact activities. PSA Architects provided
review and comment service on an hourly rate basis, and made several
valuable and cost effective recommendations. We now have a proposed ./'
floor plan for the Mayor and City Council's review at the Pre-Council_/-
Meeting on February 22, 1988.
The proposed remodeling will provide additional office space for Fire
Inspectors and utility operations, and a portion of its cost is
attributable to police operations. Therefore, the remodeling costs
should be shared by the General Fund, Utility Fund, Police Building Fund
and Fire Building Fund. Our preliminary estimate for the needed
construction is $250,000. which has been reduced by City forces having
gutted the old police wing at an estimated savings of approximately
$20,000 compared to demolition by outside contract. A better estimate
and specific funding can be established after preliminary approval by the
Council.
City Council approval is requested to proceed with preparations for
obtaining bids for this project.
Respectfully submitted,
()~ dndl
l1nnis Horvath
Senior Assistant City Manager
DH/gp
.. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER
" ......_ _ .._ , ......... r_
NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS
. -:........~ -~~,!",=,--,':_~
:,..:.....-................-,..:..~&t.¡......""...".,.¿../Þ'f:.....r-::--.. t ~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
, t
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - FEBRUARY 8, 1988 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Echols called the meeting to order February 8, 1988, at 7:30 p.m.
Present:
Dan Echols
Richard Davis
Marie Hinkle
Mack Garvin
Virginia Moody
Jim Ramsey
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Rewis
Rex McEntire
Richard Albin
Absent:
Linda Spurlock
Dick Fisher
2.
ROLL CALL
Mayor
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
City Engineer
Councilwoman
Mayor Pro Tem
3.
INVOCATION
Councilwoman Moody gave the invocation.
4.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JANUARY\25, 1988
APPROVED
Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the
minutes of the January 25, 1988 meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
5.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
None
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 8, 1988
Page 2
6.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 & 26)
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the
Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 5-0.
7.
PZ 87-26 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING -
REQUEST OF DALE AND MILDRED JONES TO REZONE
TRACT 3C1, WM. MANN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1010
FROM AG TO R-2 (LOCATED AT 7140 HIGHTOWER DRIVE)
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of this request to please come forward.
Mayor Echols stated he had been advised the applicant was unable to attend
the meeting.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please
come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the
Public Hearing.
8.
ORDINANCE NO. 1523
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin stated he was not sure of the intent of the request;
therefore he moved to table Ordinance No. 1523.
Councilman Davis stated the reason for the zoning request was to make the
property conform. Councilman Davis stated there was an existing house on
the property and it should be zoned R-2.
Motion to table died due to the lack of a second.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve
Ordinance No. 1523.
Motion carried 5-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 8, 1988
Page 3
9.
PZ 87-27 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF E-SYSTEMS POOL TRUST, INC. TO REZONE
THE FOLLOWING EXHIBITS: IITRACT C" (TRACT 11,
T.K. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1055, AND TRACT 2A,
L.C. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1652); "TRACT D"
(TRACT 12Al, T.K. MARTIN SURVEY, A8STRACT 1055);
"TRACT Ell (TRACT 2A, 3A, 3E, L. C. WALKER SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1652); "TRACT F" (TRACT 7, L.C. WALKER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1652 AND TRACT 4B, D.C. MANNING
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1046, TRACT 58, L.C. WALKER SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1652) FROM AG, R-3, & I-I TO I-I (LOCATED
IN THE MANGHAM AIRPORT AREA GENERALLY SOUTH OF
CARDINAL LANE BETWEEN DAVIS BOULEVARD AND GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY)
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of this request to please come forward.
Mr. David Washington, 500 Grapevine Highway, Hurst, representing
E-Systems, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Washington stated the property had been separated into four separate
parcels. Mr. Washington stated "Tract F" was bounded on the south by
power lines and on the east by Grapevine Highway. Mr. Washington stated
the property to the south was currently zoned agriculture, but was master
planned to a higher residential density that would be compatible for a
buffer to the residential. Mr. Washington stated there was also an
eXisting industrial zoning to the north of the tract that was owned by
E-Systems. Mr. Washington stated "Tract Ell, located on the east part of
the property, was bounded on the north and south by Agriculture, and was
also master planned to be industrial. Mr. Washington stated IITract D" was
located to the north and east of Cardinal and was also master planned to
be industrial and bounded on the east by industrial. Mr. Washington
stated that each of the three cases was recommended for approval by the
Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Washington stated that IITract C" was
not recommended for approval by the Planning & Zoning Commission, and it
was his understanding from the citizens that spoke at the meeting their
primary concerns was the buffering of the proposed industrial to the
residential property. Mr. Washington stated he wanted to make the effort
to work with the City and the citizens in every way possible to try to
generate an area that would be compatible with the neighborhood and
beneficial to the citizens of North Richland Hills, as well as the owners
of the property. Mr. Washington stated there had been proposed a three
hundred foot buffer of C-2 zoning along the west side of the property
adjacent to the residential. residential to be zoned C-2 as a buffer. Mr.
Washington stated they had also proposed that the area north of the
proposed Watauga Road be zoned C-2.
Mayor Echols stated he wanted to make clear the fact that since "Tract C"
was not approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Council
did have a letter requesting an appeal hearing, it would be the Council 's
decision whether or not the appeal would be heard on "Tract C" tonight or
at a future date.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 8, 1988
Page 4
Mr. Washington stated he would like to ask for favorable consideration on
the tracts that were approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Councilman Davis advised there would be no decision on "Tract C".
Councilman Davis stated that when a case was denied by the Planning and
Zoning Commission the applicant had the right to appeal to the Council.
Councilman Davis stated the only action the Council would take on "Tract
C" would be to grant the Appeal Hearing.
Mr. McEntire stated one of the problems connected with this case was the
alignment of Watauga Road. Mr. McEntire stated there were going to be
some hearings on Watauga Road in the next few weeks and he did not feel
the zoning request could be approached intelligently until the routing of
Watauga Road was determined.
Mr. Washington stated the owners of the tract had agreed to grant
right-of-way for Watauga Road on whatever alignment was worked out.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please
come forward.
Mr. Robert Marks, 8224 Pearl, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Marks stated he would request that the Council not act on this request
tonight. Mr. Marks asked if the Council was considering approval on
"Tracts D, E, and F".
Councilman Davis stated the Council could act on "Tracts D, E, and F" but
would not act on "Tract C".
Mayor Echols asked Mr. Marks if he was opposed to all three cases.
Mr. Marks stated he was in opposition to "Tract C" only.
Mr. Charles Scoma, 8300 Cardinal, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Scoma stated he would like to recap what happened at the Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting when these cases were heard. Mr. Scoma stated
buffering was one of the major concerns. Mr. Scoma stated other
considerations discussed had to do with devaluation of surrounding
property. Mr. Scoma stated the citizens were not opposed to the
development of the area but were opposed to carte blanche rezoning. Mr.
Scoma stated he felt the Council should very definitely consider not
acting on this but send it back to the Planning and Zoning Commission with
Council·s recommendations. Mr. Scoma stated he felt the 300 foot should
be left as is; that 300 feet of buffering was not a buffer by the time the
75 foot right-of-way was taken out for Amundson Road. Mr. Scoma stated he
felt it would be good stewardship on the part of the Council to leave the
property the way it was until such time as the alignment of the road was
definite and the funding for it was achieved. Mr. Scoma stated he would
also like to request that E-Systems entertain the idea of meeting with the
citizens directly instead of a public forum and discuss, more
specifically, what some of the likes and dislikes were related to the
various zoning requests. Mr. Scoma stated he was requesting that the
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 8, 1988
Page 5
Council reject the appeal, send it back to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and that there be further discussion on how E-Systems could
considering holding a meeting with the citizens that were directly
affected. Mr. Scoma stated that one side issue was it was very difficult
for the citizens to get notification of this type of action. Mr. Scoma
stated he would like for it to be addressed as to how, as citizens, they
were supposed to know in the normal routine of business, as far as the
Council was concerned, when an issue of this nature came up.
Mayor Echols stated the property owners within two hundred feet of a
proposed zoning were notified of the Planning and Zoning Meeting and if
they attended they would know it would go before the Council for
consideration within two weeks.
Councilman Davis stated the rezoning was also advertised in the City's
official newspaper and there should be a sign on the property showing that
the property was subject to a zoning hearing.
Mr. Scoma stated he understood it was coming up before the Planning and
Zoning Commission and he thought everyone that attended the hearing knew
the Council would be hearing the request on this date. Mr. Scoma stated
he thought the Council would be considering the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission which was negative. Mr. Scoma stated he
had no idea there would be consideration from the Council to overturn the
Planning and Zoning decision and that was the issue he was referring to.
Mr. McEntire stated the Council was not going to consider overturning the
decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Mr. Scoma stated the Council could have taken the decision to overturn the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
Mr. McEntire stated that one problem in connection with this case was that
it was published in the newspaper for consideration which made it possible
for the Council to do that. Mr. McEntire stated the other cases were not
because they were separate cases.
Councilman Davis stated that in his years on the Council the Council had
never acted on a case denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission without
official notification of an appeal hearing.
Councilwoman Moody stated she shared the concerns of all on the routing of
Watauga Road and felt until that issue was settled that none of the
rezoning should take place. Councilwoman Moody asked Mr. Scoma, as
spokesman for the group, if they were opposed to "Tracts D, E, and F".
Mr. Scoma advised he was not the official spokesman. Mr. Scoma stated
they were requesting denial of two tracts. Mr. Scoma stated one was for
multi-family and the other was "Tract CII.
Councilman Garvin stated the way to find out what was going on at the City
Hall was to have one or two citizens come down and get involved.
Councilman Garvin stated the Council's decision not to hear IITract C" was
because they cared about the citizens.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 8, 1988
Page 6
Mr. Scoma stated he was aware of the fact there was a need for better
communications between the Council, Planning and Zoning, other offices in
the City and the public. Mr. Scoma stated there was an effort in progress
to try to establish better communications betwepn the citizens in his area
and City Hall.
Councilman Ramsey stated the first he knew of this request was Thursday
night when his Council packet was delivered. Councilman Ramsey stated he
did not really believe that Mr. Scoma felt that no one on the Council was
interested in the citizens wishes. Councilman Ramsey stated that was a
statement Mr. Scoma had made, according to the Planning and Zoning
Minutes. Councilman Ramsey stated he knew for a fact that the Mayor had
been in the area and talked with the people and the fact that the Council
was still commensurating over Watauga Road indicated the Council cared.
Mr. Scoma stated he would like the record to be corrected because what he
said at the Planning and Zoning Meeting was that at times it appeared that
no one on the City Council was interested in the common citizen. Mr.
Scoma stated it had been stated that the interest level of what was going
on in the City was somewhat biased from a reality point of view. Mr.
Scoma stated that whether that was true or not was a precluded opinion.
Councilman Davis stated the Council would appreciate any suggestions Mr.
Scoma might have that would help the line of communications
Mayor Echols stated that by State Law this was an open meeting which was
posted in the lobby on February 4th. Mayor Echols stated the Council
Agenda Book was made available Thursday night for anyone who wanted to
look at it.
Mr. Scoma stated the Council Agenda Book was available, but he thought the
Council would have to agree it would be impractical to assume that without
some infamous the populace was not going to walk in and read the book.
Mr. Scoma stated that hopefully there would be enough interest to
establish a neighborhood association in his neighborhood and someone in
the association would be assigned the responsibility of checking the
agenda.
Councilman Ramsey stated, as one last point, Leslie Hicks of the Mid
Cities Daily News, was extremely diligent about picking up the agenda on
Friday. Councilman Ramsey stated that she reported on what the Council
was going to talk about on Monday night. Councilman Ramsey stated that
was another avenue that was open.
Mr. Scoma stated the press was to be commended because they did have good
reporters and they were interested in what was going on in the City.
Mr. Washington reappeared before the Council.
Mr. Washington stated he appreciated the citizens comments and would like
to say, that assuming the appeal would be granted, every effort would be
made to meet with the citizens group in the area.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 8, 1988
Page 7
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public
Hearing.
10.
ORDINANCE NO. 1524
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, that Tract C be
referred back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further study
because of the potential alignment problem of Watauga Road.
Motion carried 5-0.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve
Ordinance No. 1524, Tracts D, E, and F only.
Motion carried 3-2; Councilwoman Hinkle and Councilmen Davis and Garvin
voting for; and Councilwoman Moody and Councilman Ramsey voting against.
11.
PZ 87-28 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING -
E-SYSTEMS POOL TRUST, INC. TO REZONE TRACT 4B,
J.H. BARLOUGH SURVEY, ABSTRACT 130, FROM R-3
(SINGLE FAMILY) TO C-1 (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED
IN THE MANGHAM AIRPORT AREA EAST SIDE OF DAVIS
BOULEVARD AT LEWIS LANE) TRACT "A"
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of this request to please come forward.
Mr. David Washington, 500 Grapevine Highway, Hurst, representing
E-Systems, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Washington stated the tract in question was located immediately
adjacent to Lewis Road at the intersection of the proposed Watauga Road.
Mr. Washington stated this was one place they knew where Watauga Road was
going to be. Mr. Washington stated this tract was located on the corner
and did not appear to be appropriate for residential. Mr. Washington
stated there was some commercial zoning to the west and to the north of
the tract. Mr. Washington stated the Planning and Zoning Commission had
voted in approval of this tract and requested favorable consideration from
the Council.
Councilwoman Moody asked if this action would not be premature since no
one knew the positive alignment of Watauga Road. Councilwoman Moody
stated this could be zoning the middle of the road.
Mr. Washington stated that some portion of the tract could be in Watauga
Road but E-Systems was obligated to dedicate the right-of-way.
Councilwoman Moody asked if the City had, in writing, that E-Systems
guaranteed the dedication of all of the right-of-way, because if the
property was zoned commercial the City would have to buy the right-of-way
and it would cost the taxpayers of the City a lot of money.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 8, 1988
Page 8
Councilman Davis suggested putting a stipulation on the ordinance.
Councilman Ramsey stated that could not be done because no one knew the
exact alignment of Watauga Road.
Mr. Line asked Mr. McEntire if he had been in contact with E-Systems.
attorney regarding the dedication of right-of-way for Watauga Road.
Mr. McEntire stated E-Systems was willing to sign the right-of-way
document in regard to the alignment of the ultimate position. Mr.
McEntire stated he had advised E-Systems they you could not extract at
this time because it would make it void. Mr. McEntire stated he did not
have a problem with them keeping their word, they would sign the document
but he did not dare extract it before the zoning hearing because it would
make it void.
Mr. Washington stated they would be glad to sign the right-of-way
dedication if they knew where the alignment would be.
Councilwoman Hinkle asked what the hurry on rezoning the property was
before the alignment was settled.
Mr. Washington stated they were trying to clear up the property they had.
Mr. Washington stated this tract was one small portion of residential in
what was obviously a commercial tract because it was at the intersection.
Councilwoman Hinkle asked if the property could be cleaned up after it was
decided where the Watauga Road exact alignment would be.
Mr. Washington stated he could not see why the road was particulary
pertinent because either way you would have to have all or part of the
tract south of the road.
Councilwoman Hinkle asked what the hurry was if there was no immediate
building plans.
Mr. Washington stated that he thought the only reason was that if
E-Systems had all of the property zoned and the road alignment was
determined, then they would be in a position to get a\user and market the
land.
Councilman Davis asked if he knew who owned the property immediatley south
of the tract.
Mr. Washington stated the tax records showed the owner as being Mr. R.F.
Lewis.
Councilman Davis asked if the Lewis tract was zoned single family.
Mr. Washington replied yes. Mr. Washington stated there was no opposition
to this request at the Planning and Zoning hearing.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 8, 1988
Page 9
Mr. Charles Scoma, 8300 Cardinal, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Scoma stated he felt there had already been a lot of carte blanch
zoning; that he did not know the Council's reasoning for not voting on the
zoning, but his original request to the Planning and Zoning Commission was
that they hold off on essentially everything. Mr. Scoma stated they did
not have any hard feelings concerning the other area and thought they were
contiguous with the industrial zoing. Mr. Scoma stated he felt the whole
issue predicated on the location of the alignment of Watauga Road. Mr.
Scoma stated the Sunnybrook Subdivision would be looking at the back of
Winn Dixie and other commercial businesses. Mr. Scoma stated he did not
think the Sunnybrook area would want that and felt that this request
should not be addressed in a favorable manner.
Mayor Echols advised that this was not the area south of Sunnybrook
Addition. Mayor Echols advised this tract backed up to Davis Boulevard.
Mr. Scoma stated the issue he was speaking to at this point was Watauga
Road and E-Systems down grading the industrial to commercial.
Mr. Line stated the tract Mr. Scoma was referring to was the one which
E-Systems had requested an appeal.
Mr. Scoma stated he felt the citizens would definitely oppose industrial
across from Sunnybrook. Mr. Scoma stated that perhaps he was misinformed
on the degree of this request.
Councilman Davis asked Mr. Scoma if he would have no opposition to the
tract being C-l because of the surrounding area.
Mr. Scoma stated he did not recall anyone opposing the commercial zoning.
Councilman Davis stated the only drawback was where the potential
alignment of Watauga Road was going to be. Councilman Davis stated that
until after the Public Hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission no
one would know if this tract would be affected.
Mr. Bill Schott, 6309 Freida, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Schott stated he did not feel there was too much resistance to the
commercial zoning but felt they should wait until the road alignment was
settled.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public
Hearing.
12.
ORDINANCE NO. 1525
DENIED
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to deny Ordinance
No. 1525.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
~I
February 8, 1988
Page 10
Motion to deny failed 3-2; Councilwoman Hinkle and Councilmen Garvin and
Davis voting against denial; and Councilwoman Moody and Councilman Ramsey
voting for denial.
Councilman Davis moved to approve Ordinanoe No. 1525 with the stipulations
that no additional zoning requests on this tract or the adjacent tracts,
or no additional platting requests be accepted until the executed
dedication of the right-of-way on Watauga Road was given to the City or
State.
Councilman Ramsey stated the City could not put a stipulation on the
adjacent property.
Motion died for lack of a second.
Mayor Echols called for a vote on reconsideration of Ordinance No. 1525.
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to reconsider
Ordinance No. 1525.
Motion carried 5-0.
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to deny Ordinance
No. 1525.
Motion carried 5-0.
13.
PZ 87-29 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
E-SYSTEMS POOL TRUST, INC., TO REZONE A PORTION
OF TRACT 8A, J. H. BARLOUGH SURVEY, ABSTRACT 130
FROM R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY) TO R-8 (SINGLE FAMILY
ZERO LOT LINE) (LOCATED SOUTH OF THE SUNNY
MEADOWS SUBDIVISION) TRACT "B-2"
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of this request to please come forward.
Mr. David Washington, 500 Grapevine Highway, Hurst, representing
E-Systems, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Washington stated the tract in question was located south of the
Sunnymeadows Addition. Mr. Washington stated they were looking at this
tract as a buffering zone from the existing R-3, which a strip was left on
the property down to the R-7 to the south. Mr. Washington stated this
request was voted favorably on by the Planning and Zoning Commission and
there was no opposition from the citizens.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please
come forward.
Mr. Don Collins, 6290 Shirley Drive, appeared before the Council.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 8, 1988
Page 11
Mr. Collins stated the east side of his property line was bounded by Tract
C and the south side of his property was bounded by R-3. Mr. Collins
stated that he had asked the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider
leaving everything R-3 until Watauga Road was settled and the other
developments. Mr. Collins stated he would prefer to see the property left
R-3.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public
Hearing.
14.
ORDINANCE NO. 1526
DENIED
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to deny Ordinance
No. 1526.
Councilman Davis stated he felt there should be some way the whole area
could be master planned. Councilman Davis stated he would encourage the
applicant to look at Tract B, the multi-family, R-8 and Tract C and work
out something totally new.
Motion to deny carried 5-0.
15.
PZ 87-30 REQUEST OF E-SYSTEMS POOL TRUST, INC.
FOR AN APPEAL HEARING ON REZONING REQUEST AND
PUBLIC HEARING DATE, TRACT B-3
GRANTED
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to grant an appeal
hearing on PZ 87-30 for March 14, 1988.
Motion carried 5-0.
RECESS
Mayor Echols called a five minute recess.
BACK TO ORDER
Mayor Echols called the meeting back to order with the same members
present as recorded.
16.
GN 88-10 CALLING CITY COUNCIL ELECTION -
RESOLUTION NO. 88-2
APPROVED
Mayor Echols advised that the election for a Mayor, Council Places 2, 4
and 6 would be on May 7th. Mayor Echols advised that the Chief Election
Judge would be Byron Sibbet and the Assistant Judges would be Shirley
Newman, Adrian Woods, and Charles Spurlock. Mayor Echols stated that the
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 8, 1988
Page 12
Absentee Ballot Board would be comprised of Byron Sibbet, Jeanette Rewis,
and Robert Bartley.
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve
Resolution No. 88-2.
Motion carried 5-0.
*17.
GN 88-11 APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ADOPTING
LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS PLAN -
RESOLUTION NO. 88-5
APPROVED
18.
GN 88-12 PUBLIC HEARING - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT _
RESOLUTION NO. 88-7
APPROVED
Mayor Echols presented the following information:
"The purpose of this Public Hearing is to receive citizen input regarding
needs of our low to moderate income neighborhoods. All citizens, groups
and organizations of our City are welcome to participate and be
represented in the formulation of the 14th year plan. This Public Hearing
is open for public advice, comments, complaints, questions or
presentations of alternative proposals. The public may present their
views in writing by obtaining a questionnaire from the Ci.ty Secretary,
complete it and return it to her office and you are certainly invited to
present testimony tonight.
Based on discussion with County Staff concerning eligible CDBG Projects
within our City, we feel that renovation of the old City Hall at 6801
Glenview Drive for use as a Senior Citizens Center is a proposal which you
can add to or give an alternative. It is unknown at this time how much
grant money we will receive as it will depend on the results of the
ranking process that will take place at the Tarrant County Court House in
March. II
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward.
Ms. Maryann Gibson, representing the Senior Citizens Center, appeared
before the Council.
Ms. Gibson stated she would like to plea for help from this proposal for
renovation on the Senior Citizens Building and also for the sewer.
Mayor Echols asked if she would propose that as an alternative to doing
anything on Glenview.
Ms. Gibson stated yes.
Mayor Echols asked, what if there was more money available than it took to
do what Ms. Gibson wanted.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 8, 1988
Page 13
Ms. Gibson stated open another center.
Councilman Davis stated he had rather see two senior citizens centers at
different locations because it would also take care of the needs of the
citizens that lived in the southern part of the City. Councilman Davis
stated he would like to let Ms. Gibson know that the Council would be
having a mid-year financial workshop to see how the City funds were and
might ask the Staff to consider if there would be funds for some potential
renovations of the existing senior citizens center in next years budget.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public
Hearing.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve
Resoltuion No. 88-7.
Motion carried 5-0.
*19.
GN 88-13 PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER OPERATIONS
STUDY BY ADMINISTRATIVE & FISCAL CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
APPROVED
*20.
PU 88-07 AWARD OF BID TO GRAFF CHEVROLET
IN THE AMOUNT OF $27,946 - TWO SUBURBANS
APPROVED
*21.
PU 88-08 AWARD OF BID TO JACK WILLIAMS
IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,574 - ONE 3/4-TON PICKUP TRUCK
APPROVED
*22.
PU 88-09 AWARD OF BID TO JACK WILLIAMS CHEVROLET
IN THE AMOUNT OF $76,764 - SIX MARKED POLICE UNITS
APPROVED
*23.
PU 88-10 AWARD OF BID TO TED ARENDALE FORD
IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,138 - TWO I-TON TRUCKS
APPROVED
*24.
PU 88-11 APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1,
THOMPSON PARK ESTATES AND LETTER OF PERMISSION
TO GRADE TO DRAIN ON TRACT 4A2, T.K. MARTIN SURVEY
APPROVED
*25.
PW 88-04 AWARD OF BID ON 16" WATER MAIN ON
BURSEY ROAD IN EMBER OAKS ADDITION AND
APPROVAL OF CITY PARTICIPATION
APPROVED
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 8, 1988
Page 14
*26.
PW 88-05 AWARD OF BID ON BURSEY ROAD PAVING
IN EMBER OAKS ADDITION AND APPROVAL OF CITY PARTICIPATION
APPROVED
27.
CITIZENS PRESENTATIONS
Mr. Charles Scoma, 8300 Cardinal, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Scoma stated he read in the newspaper where the City was anticipating
implementing Teen Court.
Mayor Echols advised a committee was appointed to study the possibility.
Mr. Scoma stated he had attended a Teen Court and was extremely
impressed. Mr. Scoma stated he would encourage the Council to endorse the
Teen Court.
Councilman Davis advised Mr. Scoma that volunteers would be needed to help
Councilman Garvin and Councilwoman Moody, the Committee for Teen Court, on
implementing the program.
Mr. Scoma stated he felt the Teen Court would be of great benefit.
28.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to adjourn the
meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
I
~
Ie
I
City of ~orth ~icWand ~ls
I
I
~ ,
"oj '.,..Ii.
-
Star of the'Metroplex
I
~
I
I
I
M£REAS, ít ís the desíre of the Mayor and Cíty Councíl
of the Cí ty of North Ríchland Hí lIs to recogníze outstandíng
ach í evements ín the reta í I bak í 119 í ndu.stry; and
üt.lE1ŒA5, the Retaíl Bakers 01 Ameríca wíll be holdíng
theír 35th Annual Natíonal Retaí I Bakers Week Feb-ruary 21-27,
1988; and
Ie
U:HEREAS, the Mayor and Cíty Councíl are very proud 01
the reputatíons that the bakeríes ín North Ríchland Hí lIs hold;
and
I
æiE1ŒAS, the Mayor and Cíty Councíl wísh to take thís
opportuní ty of honor all the bakeríes that are located ín the Cí ty,
mY, IHER¡:ORE, 1, fun Echols, Mayor of the Cíty of
North Ríchland Hílls, do hereby proclaím the week of February 21st-
27th, 1988 as:
I
I
"MTICNU. RETAIL ßðJŒRs UfiK"
I
1.n the Cíty of North Ríchland Hílls, Texas, and urge all cítízens
to Joín ín thís day of recogní tíon.
I
I
, "'. I
IN WI1ÞJESS WHERECJ¡=', I have hereunto
set my hand and caused the seal of
the Cíty of North Ríchland Hílls
to be ciflíxed thís the 21st day 01
February, 1988.
\,,'. /: /
y , :.::--- /. /.
/\_-~/i _. A r j./ .,rl" ....._~~/Ll. ~.--_~.Jr.'1
Ý\./ :/' ~/ þ'~. ...-- __ _ _ r_
tbn Echols - Mayor
I
1-
'At;?1:!:J-1I.;- -
-t'! rì '/~ --'-
. ~4 r '-1-"
i- ~. f' I : ~ I.. :
~j.... I I' " 4
. ~..' : '. '. -4. Ii
-! -\
~ :\ '
~
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Department:
esubject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
Envi ronmenta 1 Serv ices Di vi s i on Council Meeting Date" 2/22/88
Proposed Amendment to Ordlnance No. 1489 - ·
Ordinance No. 1527 - Establ ishing Food Inspection Agenda Number: GN 88-14
Fees for Cnlld Care Centers
The present ordinance regulates the inspection of Child Care Facilities and allows for
the permitting of facilities that prepare and/or serve food during the course of their
daily operations. However, all Child Care Facilities, regardless whether they serve
food or not, are required by the State to have an annual inspection to retain their
license. We now do these inspections at no charge. These inspections are as time
consuming as inspections required for facilities that prepare and serve food.
We have also experienced some difficulty in identifying the number of persons who serve
as food handlers in Child Care Facilities. For this reason we are recommending, by the
attached proposed ordinance, to establish a flat fee of $150 for all inspections of
Child Care Facilities. The range of fees previously established for this service is
from $100 to $300. The proposed fee of $150 assumes average number of food handlers per
Child Care Center of five.
This proposed ordinance will allow for more equitable enforcement of Ordinance 1489
throughout the City.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1527.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Acct. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
_ Operating Budget _
_Other _ ~
~Jt/~Clƿ'~~ \~)-- elJl/~
Department Head Signature I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 0:
1
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
Ie
I
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A PORTION OF ORDINANCE
NO. 1489 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1 .
Subsection B, Section 6, Article 4 of Ordinance
1489 be, and is "hereby, amended by adding the following:
8). Child Care Facility: One hundred and fifty
dollars ($150).
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of February, 1988.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attourney for the City
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Department: Purchasing Council Meeting Date 2/22/88
~ Authorization of signatures tor unmarked l1cense--- . . :
WsUbject: plates t Resolution No. 88-6 Agenda Number: GN 88-15
I
I
The State of Texas, Highway Department requires each City to provide a
list of employees authorized by the City Council to sign for and order
license plates to be used on certain unmarked vehicles.
I
Due to the creation of the Management Services Department and vehicles
now belong to that department, it is necessary they be able to obtain
license plates and car titles for the City. Chief McGlasson has been
consulted in this matter and agrees.
I
I
I
Recommendation: Approve attached resolution authorizing Jeanette
Rewis, John Whitney, and Thomas Powell to sign any document necessary
to obtain non-exempt license plates, and apply for car titles.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budge
Other
Acct. Number N/ A
su~s~~ ~
r:tl~~
partment Head Signature ity Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
-1liA
, Finance Director
Paae 1 ,-..f
I·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
RESOLUTION NO. 88-6
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS THAT:
1 .
The Chief of Police of The City is authorized to designate
and use such unmarked license plates for vehicles as he may deem
necessary for the purpose of transporting juvenile offenders, criminal
investigations, and for performing official police duties.
2.
The following persons are authorized to handle the
registration and licensing of unmarked vehicles; Jeanette Rewis, John
Whitney, and Thomas Powell.
Passed and approved this
day of
1988.
APPROVED:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for City
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Police
Council Meeting Date: 2-22-88
Agenda Number: GN 88-16
SUbject:
Approval and Passage of Resolution # 88-8
Narcotics Coordination Interlocal Agreement
In order for the City of North Richland Hills to join with thirty four other
municipalities under a 1.1 million dollar grant to fight the narcotics trade
in Tarrant County it is required that the City Manager and the City Attorney
be granted permission to sign an inter local agreement.
The Police Department wishes to be permitted to join this "task-force" as an
ongoing part of its commitment to fight the drug trade. The only fiscal commit-
ment this City will be required to make as a result of the attached agreement
is the assignment of two (2) undercover officers to this task force. These
two men will continue in the same role previously assigned, however, they will
join nine (9) other underco,,"er officers in the group drawn from the "Northeast"
area cities and will work on narcotics in all eleven (11) "Northeast" cities
as the need arises. The attached resolution permits the City Manager to make
the requested commitment on behalf of the City of North Richland Hills.
Reconunendation:
Request Council approve passage of Resolution #88-8
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operatin Budget
Other
~(/;£/l1&~~
/ epartment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Z'
ICI1 ~
City Manager
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
RESOLUTION NO. 88-8
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, that:
1.
The City Manager be and is hereby authorized and directed to
execute the attacheœ Narcotics Coordination Interlocal Agreement as the act
and deed of this City.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 22nd day of February, 1988.
Dan Echols - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
THE STATE OF TEXAS
)
)
COUNTY OF TARRANT
THE TARRANT COUNTY
NARCOTICS INTELLIGENCE AND COORDINATION
UNIT INTERLOCAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS,
the
detection
and apprehension of
individuals in the field of narcotics manufacturing and
distribution is often hindered because the range of
operations of the criminal offender is greater than the
jurisdiction
of
the
officers
peace
called upon
to
investigate the crime; and,
WHEREAS,
the existence of a multiplicity of
political jurisdictions in Tarrant County impedes the
effectiveness of individual law enforcement agencies to
detect and eradicate narcotics activity; and,
WHEREAS, past experience has indicated that a
cooperative effort between law enforcement agencies and the
Tarrant County District Attorney's Office has been effective
in detecting and deterring the activities of targeted
criminal groups to the mutual benefit of all the political
entities of Tarrant County; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Art. 999b, TEX. REV. crv.
STAT. ANN. aut~orizing the formation of mutual aid law
enforcement units, the contracting cities, County of Tarrant
and Tim Curry Criminal District Attorney of Tarrant County
hereby agree to participate in, and be a part of a
cooperative investigative and enforcement effort to be known
- 1 -
· l-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
It
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
('
I
and designated as the Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence
and Coordination Unit ("NICU"): and,
WHEREAS, a grant of money from the Criminal
Justice Di vision of the Governor' s Office of the State of
Texas has been recei ved to fund the establishment of the
Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit.
NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That Tarr~nt County, acting by and through Roy
English, its duly authorized County Judge, Tim Curry,
Criminal District Attorney of Tarrant County, and the
following cities executing duplicate originals hereof,
administrative officer:
acting herein by and through their duly authorized chief
Arlington
Azle
Bedford
Benbrook
Blue Mound
Burleson
Colleyville
Crowley
Dalworthington Gardens
Euless
Everman
Forest Hills
Fort Worth
Grand prairie
Grapevine
Haltom City
Hurst
Keller
Kennedale
Lakeside
Lake Worth
Mansfield
North Richland Hills
pantego
Pelican Bay
Richland Hills
River Oaks
Saginaw
Sansom Park
South lake
Watauga
Westover Hills
Westworth Village
White Settlement
do hereby covenant and agree as follows:
NICO STRUCTURE
The Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence. and
County
Coordination Unit ("NICU") will be a part of the Tarrant
District
Attorney's
- 2 -
Office
for
administrative
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
purposes. The activities of the NICU shall be supervised by
a six member Board of Governors. This Board will consist of
the Fort Worth Chief of Police, the Arlington Chief of
Police, the Sheriff of Tarrant County, a Police Chief from
the Northeast Tarrant County area to be selected by
participating agencies in the Northeast Tarrant County Unit,
a Chief of Police from a small police department within
Tarrant County, and, a chairperson, who shall be the Tarrant
County District Attorney. Ex Officio members representing
the Texas Department of Public Safety, the Drug Enforcement
Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall
be added to the Board of Governors as non-voting members.
The Board of Governors shall have the
responsibility for policy, direction and control of NICU.
The Board of Governors will have direct responsibility for
the selection of a Commander for NICU. The Board will
monitor the activities and accomplishments of NICU to ensure
orderly progress towards attainment of all stated
objectives.
There will be four enforcement units to operate in
the four geographic areas of Tarrant County. These units
will be known as The Greater Arlington Unit, The Greater
Fort Worth Unit, The Tarrant County Unit and The Northeast
Tarrant County Uni t. The acti v i ties and investigations of
these four uni ts shall be coordinated by the Commander of
NICU. These units will be responsible for narcotics
investigations within their geographical areas.
- 3 -
I~
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
It
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
NARCOTIC INVESTIGATION
Narcotics investigations within the jurisdictional
bounds of the political entities joining this agreement will
be coordinated through NICU. All narcotic complaints and
intelligence received by a law enforcement agency that is a
party to this agreement will be referred to either NICU or
the appropriate geographical area unit for investigation.
NICU will maintain,' intelligence files. The geographical
area units will respond to complaints in a timely manner.
ASSET SEIZURES
All asset seizures developed by NICU and the four
geographic enforcement units will be prosecuted by the Asset
Seizure Team of NICU. The attorneys in NICU will be
responsible for representing the State of Texas and NICU in..
all forfeiture proceedings maintained under the provisions
of the Controlled Substances Act of Texas.
There is hereby created a certain fund to be known
as the NICU Asset Seizure Fund, (hereinafter called "Fund"),
said Fund to be created in compliance with Sec. 5.08 of the
Texas Controlled Substances Act, TEX. REV. CIV. STAT. ANN.
Art. 4476-15.
All money, certificates of deposit, negotiable
instruments, secur~ties, stocks, bonds, businesses or
business investments, contractual rights, real estate,
personal property or other things of value derived from the
sale, manufacture, distribution, dispensation, delivery or
other ·commercial undertaking violative of the Texas
- 4 -
I '.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
Controlled Substances Act shall be forfeited to the
organization formed hereby, NICU.
Upon entry of a judgment in a forfei ture
proceeding awarding monies or other proceeds as set out
above to NICU, said monies or proceeds will be immediately
deposi ted in the NICU Asset Seizure Fund. The monies and
proceeds in this Fund must be used to further the purpose of
NICU as required by' the NICU grant award.
This Fund shall be subject to audit by the Auditor
of Tarrant County, Texas.
If any conveyance or vehicle is the subject of a
final forfeiture, it shall be awarded to the NICU to be used
to further the purpose of NICU as required by the NICU grant
award.
OFFICER STATUS
Any law enforcement officer assigned to the NICU
or one of the four geographical uni ts by a governmental
entity which is a party to this agreement shall be empowered
to enforce all laws and ordinances applicable in the
jurisdiction of the said entities joining in this agreement,
including the power to make arrests, execute search
warrants, and investigate narcotics offenses outside of the
jurisdiction from which he is assigned, but within the area
covered by the jurisdictions of the entities which are
parties to this agreement.
While functioning as a law enforcement officer
assigned to the NICU or one of the four geographical units
- 5 -
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
~~
in a jurisdiction other than the jurisdiction from which he
is assigned, he shall have all the law enforcement powers of
a regular law enforcement officer of such other political
entity.
A law enforcement officer who is assigned,
designated or ordered by the official designated by the
governing body of any enti ty to perform law enforcement
duties as a member .~f NICU or one of the four geographical
units shall receive the same wage, salary, pension and all
other compensation and all other rights for such service,
including injury or death benefits and workmen's
compensation benefits, as though the service had been
rendered within the limits of the entity from which he was
assigned. Recognizing the benefits to a participating
entity to this agreement, it is agreed that all wage and
disability payments, including workmen's compensation
benefits, pension payments, damage to equipment and
clothing, medical expense and expenses of travel, food and
lodging, shall be paid by the entity from which said peace
officer is assigned except as hereinafter provided.
In further recognition of the benefit to be gained
by the entity participating in NICU, it is agreed that no
entity that is a party to this agreement shall receive from
another entity participating in this agreement or be
entitled to reimbursement for any services performed
pursuant to this agreement.
It is further agreed that, in the event that any
- 6 -
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
law enforcement officer assigned to NICU or one of the four
geographical uni ts shall be ci ted as a defendant party to
any civil lawsuit, state or federal, arising out of his
official acts while functioning as a law enforcement officer
assigned to NICU or one of the four geographical units, said
law enforcement officer shall be entitled to the same
benefits that such officer would be entitled to receive had
such civil action ~risen~out of an official act within the
scope of his duties as a member and in the jurisdiction of
the law enforcement agency from which he was assigned.
Further, no entity shall be responsible for the civil acts
of a law enforcement officer of another entity assigned to
NICU or one of the four geographical units except as may be
decreed by the judgment of a court of competent.
jurisdiction.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
This Contract is subject to all grant conditions
applicable to the existing grant of the Criminal Justice
Division of the Governor t s Office to the Tarrant County
Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, a copy of
which is attached hereto.
Each party to this agreement expressly waives all
claims against every other party for compensation for any
loss, damage, personal injury, or death occurring as a
consequence of the performance of this agreement.
Third party claims against members shall be
governed by the Texas Tort Claims Act or other appropriate
- 7 -
I
'-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I '"'-
statutes, or laws of the State of Texas.
It is expressly understood and agreed that, in the
execution of this agreement, no party waives, nor shall be
deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or defense that would
otherwise be available to it against claims arising in the
exercise of governmental powers and functions.
The validity of this agreement and of any of its
:
terms or provisionsl as well as the rights and duties of the
parties hereunder, shall be governed by the laws of the
State of Texas.
In case anyone or more of the provisions
contained in this agreement shall for any reason be held to
be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such
invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect.
any other provision thereof and this agreement shall be
construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable
provision had never been contained therein.
This agreement shall become effective between the
parties hereto on the day following execution of the
agreement by a party, and s~all continue in effect until it
has been terminated or rescinded by appropriate action of an
entity's governing body.
This agreement may be amended or modified by the
mutual agreement of the parties hereto in wr~i ting to be
attached to and incorporated into this agreement.
This instrument contains all commitments and
agreements of the parties, and oral or written commitments
- 8 -
I" ·
~
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
t. i-
contained herein shall have no -force or effect to alter any
term or condition of this agreement.
The parties agree that their collective agreement
may be evidenced by the execution of an identical
counterpart of this instrument by the duly authorized
official(s) of each participant and the failure of any
member to enter into this agreement shall not affect the
agreement between and ûmong the parties executing the
agreement.
Signed this
day of January, 1988.
COUNTY OF TARRANT I TEXAS
TARRANT COUNTY CRIMINAL
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
By:
ROY ENGLISH
County Judge
By:
TIM CURRY, Criminal
District Attorney
CITY OF NORTH RICBLAND BILLS
By:
City Manager, City of
North Richland Hills
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney, City of
North Richland Hills
- 9 -
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Department: Purchasin
.. _ Emergency purchase of 40
~ubject: for Police Facilities.
I
I
Ton Air Con 1t10n1ng
~ Council Meeting Date:
nl.L
2/22/88
Agenda Number:
PU 88-13
On February 9, 1988, Management Services was advised of an air
conditioning/heating problem in the new Police facility (old Library
section). This part of the new Police Department is cooled and heated
by the same unit that had been supporting the Library. It is a 13
year old unit having no preventive maintenance in the early years of
use.
This unit has three of the compressors out, all the cooling coils are
closed and the copper tubing is bad. On a unit this old and present
condition a total rebuild would cost almost as much as a new unit.
I have been advised by three (3) separate heating and air conditioning
firms it would be a waste of money to rebuild.
Due to this unit supporting a 24 hour, 7 days a week operation and is
it's cooling for their computers, it is imperative to move quickly.
As in accordance with the City Managers authority and State Law which
states in Article 2368, Section 1, Sub Section A, Procurements Exempt
from Bidding, "Procurements made in case of public calamity, where it
becomes necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the
necessity of the citizens or to preserve the property of the City".
A new 40-ton unit has been placed on order and will be installed as
soon as possible. The total cost for the unit, electrical, plumbing,
transportation and crane service will be $27,000.00.
Sufficient funds are available in Police Unspecified CIP and will
require a transfer as indicated below:
FROM: Police Unspecified 13-90-99-5200
$27,000
TO: Police Capital 13-80-86-6250
$27,000
Recommendation: Radification as outlined above to Honeywell Building
Services in an amount not to exceed $27,000 and approve transfer of
funds as indicated.
Finance Review
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
GO
w12::h
.
Page 1 of 1
I Public Works
.Department:
~ Award of Bid on Starnes Road Paving and Drainage
I Subject:
Bids were received on this project on February 16, 1988 and the low bidders for both
alternates are shown below.
I
I
I Alternate N. 2 - 8" Thick Concrete Paving
*Austin Paving 904,568.17
I J.L. Bertram Construction 962,736.48
L.H. Lacy 988,307.94
Funding Source:
I Sufficient funds were appropriated for the Starnes Road Project.
outlined as follows:
I
Ie
I
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
. Operating Budget
_ Other:
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Council Meeting Date: 2/22/88
Agenda Number: PW 88-06
Alternate No. 1 - 8" Thick Asphalt Paving
Bidder Amount
*SRO Paving $823,266.10
Austin Paving 825,620.63
APAC-Texas, Inc. 887,875.65
Calendar Days Bid Time
250
290
250
290
240
225
A detail listing is
Revised
Description Budgeted Budget/Control Over/(Under)
13-03-86-6150
Construction Sheets $898,814 $504,766 $(394,048)
13-03-86-6170
Construction Drainage -0- 329,320 329,320
02-09-83-6700 - Starnes
Road Water Adjustment 57,310 70,483 13,173
$956,124 $904,569 $ (51,555)
The budget amount for utility adjustments is not sufficient. However, funds are
available in Unspecified 1988 R~venue Bonds and a transfer is requested as follows:
From: 02-09-99-6700 - Utility Unspecified
To: 02-09-83-6700 - Starnes Rd. - Water Adjustment
$13,173
13,173
Recommendation:
The staff recommends award of this project to Austin Paving Company in the amount of
$904,568.17 for a period of 290 calendar days. Concrete paving is recommended due to
minor difference in cost compared to the longer life expectancy. The staff also
recommends approval of the fund transfers as indicated above.
x
Finance Review
Acct. Number See Above
Sufficient Funds Available
. Finance Director
.'/t.
. ent Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
1
I
,.
~
ì
\\":' ;",.: ~. .. . ~~ I ~1-::rtY&ffi
-<.\.:~'~~>,>:~~~;~J! /~;:o
,.-' .. ... . //.~ 1 r"';: '<:\\ \'ò~ >. ~ J i ~, ' ~'-"T~~:
. -r- . . < ~., , ... .... 't \:.,.\.... ...J.. ~ ' I ! ; ~... .
~+~.·3!=t.~~.\...:~.···rF\:.~<{<.,- 'I ¡, ?
~ . . - .: ~ ," ... T', i L ' : \ t : I: ~ ~ . :\ - . . '1 f· . , . . 1 f n ..
, -, -"1...JW!:',' .. ('~..,..: .: ~~:' '> I -.-J' ~- --.. .....~..~
'. ~~t.f":.~~l : i ~ ~ ~~'r ..~;.~~ u1! ~\::~~
r. -_. ,_..L.o'.-L ~. . .-. '--<. J~. ~-"r. ,~. .,
JT---- ~---- .~d______ _..~~ ~~~1T' 1:' '_
. - / , . .. . ,. -
1,' \\.:~~\ 'Î~ì td~~'
i "" ¡I.. ,
I' . \ . ~ . - _ ,~
, \\\ :.t1 ': i=-
~\JJ1¿
'\\ . ,;, i .
\\~ ~:~
~
)(:- \.
¡ ".\~
! '~',
, t
!
I
Ie
I
..
:
I
'I
\\
Ie
Il
I!
I ~.. ~.. i 1~~
I : ~¥ ~ ~u i
I '~. . t ~ . r ~;;~
L - 'I . "> V -- 1-1
-----~-I; :. ',,;,
I I.
I
I
Ie
I
I~ .
~ r!~"" ~. .
I :~!::
"
I /
J /
I~-- ,:--- '.;i~
n.. . T;c'.~ II
I' .U{J· .
. .,. ~ ...., J
; II
r- o.L-
--.J
I
~_~---!.J.'_'..1'!
(
--J
ï.i\nr
U)
t-
OZ
zw
«¿
w
t->o
W04:
wa:::o
a::: a... a::
t-¿
U)HU)
W
owz
w~a:::
<n4:4:
ozt-
a...HU)
04:
a::: a::: 0
a...ot-
If
I
. ,
JII ,,,
- 9 . . . .,..
I_~~~.-
I L
r;.~~.~~~~[ ~;~~~~
. . . . . . : .~. .' . . _ J
'. : .: ~. :} "
I,
~.
I
. ~ .. l
, ~..-~ ~~~: ': \,;' :''':''': : '·0
.JL_-
3^ I ~o MONS 3~nH : i
~ t t - ....T 'rT ~? . - --~. . . . :' .
~; ; J '.:~: '! ~: . . ,-:::" :~ . F f~t-~:: -": '.~t. -
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
('
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
February 16, 1988
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: 3-342, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
STARNES ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE
BID TABULATION
In accordance with your instructions, bids were received on February 16, 1988, for the
referenced project. This project includes paving and drainage improvements on Starnes
Road from Shady Hollow to Crabtree. Also included are associated water system
adjustments. Alternates were provided for both asphalt paving (Alternate 1), and
concrete paving (Alternate 2). A summary tabulation of the low bidders is presented
below. Bids were received from a total of twelve (12) contractors.
The low bid for Alternate 1 (Asphalt Paving) was received from SRO Paving Inc., 1007
. Harrison Avenue, Arlington, Texas 76010. The low bid for Alternate 2 (Concrete
Paving) was received from Austin Paving Company, P.O. Box 947022, Ft. Worth, Texas
76147. The bid tabulations are broken down as follows:
Alternate 1
* SRO PAVING *
(Asphalt)
Alternate 2
* AUSTIN PAVING *
(Concrete)
Budget
Paving $
Drainage
Yater
436,!761.14
319,110.06
67,394.90
$ 504,765.67
329,319.50
70,483.00
$ 586,000
334,410
57,310
Total Low Bid $
823,266.10
$ 904,568.17
$ 977,720
Calendar Days
250
290
360
The following are other low bids:
ASPHALT
CONCRETE
TIME
Austin Paving $
SRO Paving
J.L. Bertram
L.U. Lacy
APAC
824,620.63
(See Above)
No Bid
No Bid
887,875.65
$ (See Above)
No Bid
962,736.48
988,307.94
996,517.35
240 Days
225
250
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
,I
February 16, 1988
STARNES ROAD BID TABULATION
Page
2
The difference in the Asphalt and Concrete Alternates is $ 81,302.07. The combined
paving and drainage low bid for Alternate 1 is $ 823,266.10, and for Alternate 2 is
$ 904,568.17. Both of these alternates are lower than the total budgeted amount of
$ 977,720 authorized by you for this project. Alternate 1, by SRO Paving, is
$ 154,453.90 lower than the budget, and Alternate 2, by Austin Road, is $ 73,151.83
lower than the budget.
The low bids for the water system work of $ 67,394.90, for SRO Asphalt, and
$ 70,483.00, are both higher than the budgeted amount of $ 57,310. We would recommend
that the utility fund for this project be increased to at least $ 71,000 regardless of
which contractor is awarded the contract.
We would note that several existing utilities owned by Southwestern Bell Telephone
Company, Lone Star Gas Company, TU-Electric Company, Sammons Cable Communications
Company, and the City of North Richland Hills, require relocation or adjustment, and
such work has not yet been performed. The contractor will be required to perform all
non-conflicting work in this contract first until such utility conflicts have been
resolved. Delays to the contractor due to utility conflicts shall be cause for
extension of contract completion time but not cause for extra compensation to the
contractor. SRO Paving bid 250 Calendar Days and Austin Paving Bid 290 Calendar Days.
Both are under the estimated construction time of 360 Calendar Days.
Regarding the two alternates provided in this contract, Alternate 1 includes an 8-inch
thick asphalt pavement section on 8-inches of stabilized subgrade, and Alternate 2
includes an 8-inch thick reinforced concrete pavement section on 8-inches of
stabilized subgrade. Because of the expansive soils upon which the proposed pavement
will be constructed, you can anticipate future movement and cracking of both an
asphalt or concrete pavement surface throughout the life of the thoroughfare. A
two-year maintenance bond is provided in this contract which requires the contractor
to repair all cracks or pav~ment failures during this maintenance period. We would
defer recommendation of which Alternate to award, asphalt or concrete pavement, to the
Public Works Department.
Based on the bids submitted, we would recommend award of the contract to SRO Paving
Company, if Alternate 1 (Asphalt) is selected, in the amount of $ 823,266.10 for a
pèriod of 250 Calendar Days, or to Austin Paving Company, if Alternate 2 (Concrete) is
selected, in the amount of $ 904,568.17, for a period of 290 Calendar Days.
We will be present at the February 22, 1988, Council meeting to answer any questions
you may have concerning this project.
w. ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
,
~
February 16, 1988
STARNES ROAD BID TABULATION
Page
3
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Yorks
Hr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Mr. Larry Jones, City Inspector
I
I
I Subject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie Funding Source:
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Publ ic Works
Council Meeting Date: 2-22-88
Agenda Number: PW 88-07
Approval of 1988 Miscellaneous Street
Repalrs ProJect
The CIP Committee at their February 2, 1988 meeting considered miscellaneous street
repair projects submitted by the Public Works Department which would alleviate
"ponding-water" at numerous locations throughout the City. The Committee decided to
have the Public Works staff prioritize the individual repairs into $60,000 to $80,000
projects based on the (1) current level of deterioration, (2) timing of total street
repair in future, and (3) location with respect to other proposed repairs.
As per the CIP Committee's instructions, the following is a list of the individual
street repairs by location which we are proposing for the first year, 1988, project.
Total
7617 Teresa Court
Little Ranch Road @ Dana Lane
Little Ranch Road @ Sean Drive
Marilyn Lane (Redondo to Canton)
4900 Lariat Trail
3829 Diamond Loch East
7112 Jeffrey Court
Estimated total construction
15% Engineering & Surveying
Estimated Cost
cost
$10,000
7,700
3,300
18,000
12,900
4,000
5,600
$61,500
9,000
$70,500
Sufficient funds are available in Unspecified General CIP and will require a transfer
as indicated below:
From:
13-90-99-4300
Unspecified-Streets
$70,500
To: _
1988 Miscellaneous St. (New Acct)
13-19-88-4200 Engineering
13-19-88-6150 Construction
Total
$ 9,000
61,500
$70,500
Recommendation:
The staff recommends to approve the street repairs recommended by the CIP Committee as
shown above and authorize the City's consulting engineer to prepare plans and bid
documents for the above named project. The staff also recommends funds be
appropriated as shown above.
x
Finance Review
Acct. Number See Above
ds Available
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
e Operating Budget
OtheUr
./
,I
. Finance Director
'v/ ~ ~ ~Zv---
t Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
O':'\ro~ 1 ,-l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Public Works
Department:
Award of Bid on Hightower Drive
SUbject: P.åviug àud DLaL.¡age
- Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: PW 88-08
2-22-88
Bids were received on this project on February 16, 1988 and the low bidders for both
alternates are shown below:
Alternate No. 1 - 8" Thick Asphalt Paving
Bidder
*SRO Paving
Austin Paving
APAC-Texas, Inc.
AIrount
$408,575.08
410,502.57
422,113.85
Calendar Days
Bid Time
175
170
No Bid
Alternate No. 2 - 8 II Thick Concrete Paving
Bidder
~*Austin Paving
Marriott Construction
Ed Bell Construction
Anount
$451,620.97
478,992.29
479,253.13
Calendar Days
Bid Time
170
130
150
funding Source:
Sufficient funds were appropriated by City Council for the Hightower Road Project with
only minor adjust:rœnts needed. The detail is listed as follows:
e Revised Budget over
Description Budget Contract Amt (under)
13-04-86-6150
Construction-Streets $357,933 $219,564 $(138,369)
13-04-86-6175
Construction-Drainage -0- 133,945 133,945
02-09-56-6700
I Water Adjust:rœnt 60,000 79,703 19,703
02-09-56-6750
Sewer Adjustments 40,000 18,409 \( 21,591)
$457,933 $451,621 $( 6,312)
A transfer of budgeted arrounts is required between water and sewer adjustments as
indicated above.
x
Finance Review
Acct. Number See above
Sufficient E ds Available
w-
, Finance Director
ent Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
P?':::~ 1 t'f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Recornnendation:
The staff recamends award of this project to Austin Paving Canpany in the annunt of
$451,620 · 97 for a period of 170 calendar days. Concrete paving is recarmended due to
the minor difference in cost canpared to the longer life expectancy. The staff also
recornnends approval of the fund transfers as indicated on previous page.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~\ ~~'~\ ';--Z~~II ~~-
~ ~>~j--~~'-"\ -~~ ~ I ! ~
., \~ ~~ '.. ~ ,,~ I _
';:T~~= ':;<'->ll' ~ ~~:-.
1 ~. ~r:w:.- ~ ;';,' ,1 ~ _. L.. .... ~ --, ~ ~. \ ,
/ .. ~~.=. " ^;..~ ~-.. -' . ,......,. \ -
~-----. '\ .~ '\. ~~~ h
.. .. ~':F-: \ \ ~<,~':..~.\ ~"~ n
,..~ ~:= '. ----:; 1~" ~~-;.,:.
I ';,:~ ~--, ~...-, ~ ,:0'"'~!S. T:-:' f-=- - ..
IL \\\\ -:~-=" . '~~!':)et ·
~, I '\~ :1\-1 =1f-~'. IU
.~ \::::it-Ht;:<1'.- ~':Tl ~ ,~. '"', '. f:-' ... ~1 ~~,"'I .~
,~~~\:' ,L~tc~~tt: r:' '."J.:.;.~ ª --:- \'" ,:.. ¿~~.... ,__~-~ .~_ _
.. 'Y~~ . ...,...,~. r-'.. 'u . . õ--. ." w \. ...1.1..1-'-01 Ii, :;-;..
-. - ~.\. I . -.. r ~ h--. y' I ,. .'...... " I' ,[J-! · . .-. ~:Þ-. Z ~ 9 , .1 ( t . ~ t 1) ð") j
~ L........-.....~. . . '. i" · I - ~.. ..... "..-' 0 0 .... . . . ¡ "1.1-. ~~+'] i -----" I
t1 -. -l't-~ .~.~ to . ~-l, T l ;~ :~" ~.~ - · +- I : :.~ .:- H ~ + · ~ t ~ ~. : ~f ~, ~ l ~ . ! --' ,~.;. '
11 J ,.,...,.'i .. . ~.. ., ." . -~-/'\ \ ~:r r- ..:- ".' ¡ , . ~ l
I ' :- J;>';- . ~... - t:.: · ::/ '.- ; I ". ,-; F-~ . 'i· ~ \ g ~ ..-4 · . ~:! ~.: ~ i~ ; 1 i !. , , I!
' : ... .' ,~" ~, 't'-~i: 1· : t--c: .. .....,- ~~~ ,,:~-': a:::c: . \. J<..~ ?~. · .~.. j i w~ ~'1" ¡
. ~-'r-S~.-'.-. ~' ~ =-1 ~l~· . .. ''::fl_~~ · ;:--:: I- <t '. ',.,~ ~ i j r- · . !1
. ,'''cJ _. .1~ - -- ~:".. !. ~ :- --it=~~ ~El t:; . / ~LW õi.....-.' -= I'I .
~.. . n, , . P. 'I' · ............ t:. I..:.:'I h /. d(/)'. _ . . _ . !
I I,' I IR-~- L!-;'1 \,. , :'~1H1~ ~~, -~~~ 1_t1 :\. ~~ - ~
~ ~ I, b, rJ· ~ ., :~,r"", -: ,,"" "". . H"~ '.-.:§ "I".
-- .1t:~ '. 1.1-< 1 '1- . 'D \'r~ ~_ I--I! . . "
I ~ t '., >¿(I',t 7~ Y'r-:..t:::":'-'rt,. '1'. ". - · "', .'
~ ~~ - t :hu -~ ., ...;V"'< J . P.......~" :~..:::: _ ~. \ " _. I
~S:\w-. , , \,/T T" 't - ,r æ·"~' ~ ,~ .' -= ~'--- ----- --=--_~. '." .__._
II -- L -. ,~' ! t+--..... ~ ¡-. ;~ ',:", "-r l' ,,, -L~ ~ ~ i c.~ ~" \ -l.
I ~ · '9-·-···· ,..~~ .......~ ...- 6" '- -~ w ~~,< :
~ -if . : ' L t'~ . I I' , LJ ...:::- == '=:: n iii p ~ I '\. ; i ì : : .
~ J : I: L G j I [¡ I H f-i ~¡ c:.-=:J '- ==' .:= I I i hi ! j ~ · . b \-.( -,
~~~~.,Í..I~~·- rilú~::!::~~" ~~ - -- f-V:~\:.IJ -~~:>,
. '1fu;f.· " I ~PC.·--:-~!JJ.~··:":·i ~ ; ~\ '--~!::'~'-i-'tP~
~ ~i~-/~; -; tm. illII TT 11 1 .:qFi:..-=tf!=f E, ,. J':' --=1f- I I ] ~ 1Jh~ r;:., ~
B:··~:~~~:~,~·~:;jl~~~:-::1taH n Ily~Lcti" Q'fF=-1-:= =t-=, ¡:::~ n.'
~~ - .:.. [~"~im~ll; ;~11\liZ>1@ft*¡"HL1I-1"ILI~ ~ 1 ' ~ ~~~~
l-~i 1 ;:.';~;;~:,;;.;: t.: , j! 11 r:¡ W ~ '" TT\\ 'i I TH T;" f - I' ~-'fI ¡ '.._ ..... :...... i:: ~:...-; E;:: (
t---i~~ji:'Il~fc:;:;lr,¡' '-.~ 0 , ~C ~ffi =~ a
~~ ri~~ TI+r~EJL ...J~ · L L ~ ~ \J.... ;. ~r- m.t-'j, ~}; ~~
. . :u: / ;::Clu. ~ãi:.~'u~~.J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.... 1"::"1 \\1 n I I ¡~i ~~~: ~:I
'. : " , " <t ~ 0 0 [:::t'] I ~:= ~t::::
. I \ a.. a: I . I I _ L-4._ ""'-. t:1--
'D'~"'-- -LLL~ J . 0 w~ f5 i I '-1 j' ~ ~:: ~~~
I "': :d: .::CI H- I '.\ ~~; ~ =- ,/ \Î~ ~ ++ . IVi\j¿E- ~
L'-'-~~~: . ~, [~~~ .~~ f@ ~ 1 ¡ -I ! \i! -,,- ~
~, 1.' fl' ¡I' 1 J ~tJ[J ,~, I ILl '~Yrr i rw¡a-T1-1 " I ¡+LJ
- ~ I ~ · ~ ,~' 'I .,,' I I ' ., I ~-
I I 1 T ~ ~~~0.~~'Ll-ii- ' ~ -.I I¡ ~_ ~ _
J :¡p=a " - ~ ~>>Q;~ CJ' I ~~~ 'd:-'f Ê--.¡. ,\ .
' L_ .~ \\~~'þ:::,¡=yy;ì ~'\;'7- . i,l ~ q~ .. 'k~ " Z a: ~ :~~i Cf :,
'Oli, ~~ ~,~.'~ \ " . -.\ftF1~~.;~~ s ~ ~ "'ŒT. II IrrTm1IJ· tf _ "~lJ. .
I ! ~}I1r :;0. ".. 1J I I).. I ;+.4~' . rrr 11 ~ 1 t- 0 + ~ PI! H ~ / T
I f ~:
'Ii .,.'=:J, ' ~ =i .-l.:r +..:.. ~ .~. \: f-þ t1 ~. J,~ 'n, . . . lJ--1~ '.~
~ ~. \..... - ~ ~~~:j '¡ ~~1 ,,~. ±~~ z <t ~ rn·..J ~J ~~ : .' t::t ~ , . : .
. '-\--- ~ .,~ . ~+,t~l,·l .: 0 0 I- __ -t~ -:'. - :- '..
- - -;::: \,:'--: ~ \ ~\--':;:~:~:~;i~~'::L:..'.·"'ï.rl L) ~ r.n ~ ~TT1I! IHl b ~, [1: ~ -t, . ~: ~,~
I - , .\ '.'" ..' ...- ': \ \ , · 1.1' Z 0 W T II I I' ì '.s- ¡ . ~ ' .
'-\.- .. . H a.. > . ufit .¡ li3~ ' :;
"Ii ~ffiJ~~ 5. 1-:/ \' ~.\ :'II~ Π~ J\~W~)flL~ [ ~
- II . .. :'\ ~:5~ r ' - -y l-:!r lll~~+ ... \',
I ~ 3<-+ '." t\ \~ tT t· .~.', b -'~..,
IlL ~ s". ~ ~T f--: !'::. :.t- .~-J f i :: : ._____~¡ :cL _ "'-:.
i '--'~f~-C ~~~{1i:--i~~ :f~ :~r.~-fI:::;DJ~~'iL+ni:tl _ .~.~,_!;~ ~lC:: ''''':i-::.:: . ,~~.\~
I t~ ~::::'''4"~;I:: t.: J: : :. : 1: : ;1 : -!- -r~. . CL ~rt£ tU '" ~ l' ~'nrï£.-~~ : :: . ~.: : i..' ... I / ~\~. '=. .
t-:1 ~?m~:ct::-~::- ;~.~. .; . - -. ':, / ¡ _..:.l ~GEÞ{m~ï~';':..r::t*f:i'ª:~: .;: 1....--... "~;'\'.J .->~ . ..~: \
. F~mr; ,': ¡;,I:¡i1r:\ ;.' ;.-~::~,:,. ~~J r ~ ..l~1 ¿;~~:~ß'-:.":..:.:.~JL~~ ~L. ~::.: ~ ~~.,:,~ ~:>.I" ;.?if~~' ,¡ A
.....'r.TI.."".1. ......... . '" -.. ~ __ I 4,.:. L..........;.·.. ,~ r..~. . :.1, .,. ', 10! X.l ¡ ~ ..~" . ..
~I"~::;;;:::::::'::"~:'.: .. . J, !:.. t 1/ .'\' . .j;. ,1'-·":0 :.: .:~-~. t. : 0: .,.. " ", . . .'
I '
---. 'L I
I' ! :
_L---..J
e
I
"
~
!
~--=-=
II ~~~
-~~-,- .)
'-
~
jt~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I·
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
February 16, 1988
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: 3-343, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
HIGHTOVER DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE
BID TABULATION
In accordance with your instructions, bids were received on February 16, 1988, for the
referenced project. This project includes paving and drainage improvements on
Hightower from Morgan Meadows to Briarwood Estates. Also included are associated
water and sewer system adjustments. Alternates were provided for both asphalt paving
(Alternate 1), and concrete paving (Alternate 2). A summary tabulation of the low
bidders is presented below. Bids were received from a total of thirteen (13)
contractors.
The low bid for Alternate 1 (Asphalt Paving) was received from SRO Paving Inc., 1007
Harrison Avenue, Arlington, Texas 76010. The low bid for Alternate 2 (Concrete
Paving) was received from Austin Paving Company, P.O. Box 947022, Ft. Worth, Texas
76147. The bid tabulations are broken down as follows:
Alternate 1 Alternate 2
* SRO PAVING * * AUSTIN PAVING * Budget
(Asphalt) (Concrete)
Paving $ 190,622.04 $ 219,563.76 $ 220,000
Drainage 124,873.74 133,945.24 130,000
Vater 75,667.70 79,702.97 60,000
Sewer 17,411.60 18,409.00 40,000
Total Low Bid $ 408,575.08
$ 451,620.97
170
$ 450,000
180
Calendar Days
175
The following are other low bids:
ASPHALT
CONCRETE
TIME
Austin Paving $
SRO Paving
Hariott
Ed Bell
APAC
410,502.57
(See Above)
512,249.48
No Bid
422,113.85
$
(See Above)
No Bid
478,992.29
479,253.13
480,509.90
130 Days
150
No Bid
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
,.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 16, 1988
HIGHTOYER DRIVE ROAD BID TABULATION
Page
2
The difference in the Asphalt and Concrete Alternates is $ 43,045.89. The combined
paving and drainage low bid for Alternate 1 is $ 315,495.78, and for Alternate 2 is
$ 353,509.00. Alternate 1 is lower than the total budgeted amount of $ 350,000
authorized by you for this project. Alternate 2, is over the budget. Alternate 1, by
SRO Paving, is $ 34,504.22 lower than the budget, and Alternate 2, by Austin Road, is
$ 3,509.00 above the the budget.
The low bids for the utility system work of $ 93,079.30, for SRO Asphalt, and
$ 98,111.97, for Austin Paving, are both lower than the combined utility budgeted
amount of $ 100,000. We would recommend that the utility fund for this project be
maintained to at least the budgeted amount of $ 100,000 regardless of which contractor
is awarded the contract.
We would note that several existing utilities owned by Southwestern Bell Telephone
Company, Lone Star Gas Company, TU-Electric Company, Sammons Cable Communications
Company, and the City of North Richland Hills, require relocation or adjustment, and
such work has not yet been performed. The contractor will be required to perform all
non-conflicting work in this contract first until such utility conflicts have been
resolved. Delays to the contractor due to utility conflicts shall be cause for
extension of contract completion time but not cause for extra compensation to the
contractor. SRO Paving bid 175 Calendar Days and Austin Paving Bid 170 Calendar Days.
Both are under the estimated construction time of 180 Calendar Days.
Regarding the two alternates provided in this contract, Alternate 1 includes an 8-inch
thick asphalt pavement section on 8-inches of stabilized subgrade, and Alternate 2
includes an 8-inch thick reinforced concrete pavement section on 8-inches of
stabilized subgrade. Because of the expansive soils upon which the proposed pavement
will be constructed, you can anticipate future movement and cracking of both an
asphalt or concrete pavement surface throughout the life of the thoroughfare. A
two-year maintenance bond is provided in this contract which requires the contractor
to repair all cracks or pavement failures during this maintenance period. We would
defer recommendation of which Alternate to award, asphalt or concrete pavement, to th~
Public Yorks Department.
Based on the bids submitted, we would recommend award of the contract to SRO Paving
Company, if Alternate 1 (Asphalt) is selected, in the amount of $ 408,575.08 for a
period of 175 Calendar Days, or to Austin Paving Company, if Alternate 2 (Concrete) is
selected, in the amount of $ 451,620.97, for a period of 170 Calendar Days.
We will be present at the February 22, 1988, Council meeting to answer any questions
you may have concerning this project.
~w ~
RICHARD V. ALBIN, P.E.
RYA/ra
Enclosures
I
,
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
. .
February 16, 1988
HIGHTOYER DRIVE ROAD BID TABULATION
Page
3
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
Hr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Yorks
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Mr. Larry Jones, City Inspector