The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1988-05-23 Agendas I I I I I I I I I '.'.............'"..',..,:...··1 . ~, ',~j,1 .{"t ..,~,.'...,..','.·...à....:.'.,.".,.'.,~,'.'.:.,:.....I .F-A' f~···:~ ~I :'.;.'·\,·..·.·,·.1,·,'.·.·.' f '.'tïf: I..··.",t.'..,..,....'.'.~.·.",'.. ~~_L~. p,,1 ~,.i / .- ~.~<. 'I,' ~~_. ·I¡·""'.··.,·_,'...,.'...·~,··.··. ~~' CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 23, 1988 - 6:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. GN 88-43 Approve Revised Drainage Plan for Carston Court Addition (Agenda Item No. 14) (15 Minutes) 2. GN 88-42 Agreement 'with Southern Pacific Transportation Company for Watauga Road Crossing, Resolution No. 88-15 (Agenda Item No. 13) (10 Minutes) 3. landscaping & Decoration Breakdown (Memo from John Whitney) (10 Minutes) 4. PW 88-17 "Approval of Miscellaneous Traffic Signalization Installations, Change Order No. 1 (Agenda Item No. 20) (5 Minutes) 5. IR 88-13 Traffic Signals at FM 1938 (Davis Blvd.) and North Richland Blvd. (10 Minutes) 6. IR 88-12 Use of New Pre-Council Meeting Room (10 Minutes) I .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I tl I I >,1 Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7. PU 88-31 Approval of Purchase of Right-of-Way from Marguriete Morrow for the Purpose of Constructing Smithfield Road (Parcels 6 & 7) (Agenda Item No. 16) (5 Minutes) 8. Possible Work Session (5 Minutes) 9. Other Items (5 Minutes) 10. *Executive Session (15 Minutes) a. Personnel Discussion b. Pending Litigation *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 23, 1988 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2 . Roll Ca 11 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting May 9, 1988 5. Presentation of Award - Records Retention 6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 7. Consent Agend~ Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, & 20) * 8. PZ 88-6 Request of Americity Corporation for Appeal Hearing * 9. PS 88-2 Request of Burk Collins Investments and Sonic Industries, Inc. for Replat of Lots 1 through 4, Block 3 Culp Addition (Located on the southeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Northeast Parkway) *10. GN 88-30 Teen Court, Ordinance No. 1539 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *11. GN 88-40 Endorsement of the Outline of legislative Strategy for Clean Air Act, Resolution No. 88-14 12. GN 88-41 Set Date for Public Hearing on Proposed Water and Sewer Rate Increase *13. GN 88-42 Agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation Company for Watauga Road Crossing, Resolution No. 88-15 *14. GN 88-43 Approve Revised Drainage Plan for Carston Court Addition *15. GN 88-44 Authorizing Signatures, Resolution Nos. 88-16 & 88-17 *16. PU 88-31 Approval of Purchase of Right-of-Way from Marguriete Morrow for the Purpose of Constructfng Smithfield Road (Parcels 6 & 7) *17. PW 88-14 Approval of Hightower Drive Paving and Drainage Improvements, Change Order No. 1 *18. PW 88-15 Approval of Starnes Road Street & Drainage Improvements, Change Order No. 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I þ Page 3 NUMBER ACTION TAKEN ITEM *19. *20. PW 88-16 Approval of Starnes Road Street & \ Drainage Improvements, Change Order No. 2 PW 88-17 Approval of Miscellaneous Traffic Signalization Installations,. Change Order No. 1 21. Citizens Presentations 22. Adjournment I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of J(8rth Richland Hills, Texas May 20, 1988 PUBLIC NOTICE Item added to the North Richland Hills, Texas, City Council Agenda for the May 23, 1988 meeting: 16a. PU 88-26 Landscaping and Christma!s Decoration ~h~(~ ~~ Janette ReW1S ty Secretary POSTED MAY 20, 1988 - 11:30 A.M. (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR RR-]4 Date: May 23, 1988 Subject: Add New 911 Surcharge on Intrastate Long Distance Calls Transmitted herewith is a copy of a letter received this week regarding a new surcharge to support 911 emergency services which will begin appearing on telephone bills after July 1, 1988. . The Attorney for the City, Rex McEntire, usually provides staff analysis and comment on utility matters. The attached will be referred to him fG~ review upon his t"eturn to the City. Respectfully submitted, RtØ Rodger N. Line City Manager RNL/gp Attachment cc: Rex McEntire ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS I -. Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I II I Ie I I TARRANT COUNTY 9 - 1 - 1 TEXAS AMERICAN BANK BUILDING 500 THROCKMORTON, SUITE 2706 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 (817) 334-0911 May 16, 1988 Mr. Rodger Line City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 _: Dear Mr. Line: House Bill 911, designating 9-1-1 as the primary emergency number within Texas and providing funding and coordination for its implementation statewide became law on May 28, 1987. The act also established the Advisory Commission on State Emergency Communications and charges it with the administration of statewide 9-1-1 implementation. Provisions for funding statewide 9-1-1 include the following section: Section 6 Financing-(b.) In addition to the f~e imposed under Subsection (a) of this section, the advisory commission may impose a 9-1-1 equalization surcharge on each customer receiving intrastate long distance service, including customers in an area served by an emergency communications district, whether or not the district is participating in the regional plan. The fee must be in an amount not exceeding one-half percent of charges for intrastate long-distance service, as defined by the advisory commission. Please be advised that the state advisory commission has established a surcharge of .2 percent on intrastate long distance service. The surcharge will be effective July 1, 1988, and your city, including your elected officials, can anticipate inquiries from the public at that timee It should be pointed out that neither your city, the 9-1-1 district, the county. nor the telephone company is levying this fee, and the proceeds are distributed for the purpose of statewide 9-1-1 planning and implementation. Please contact us if statewide 9-1-1 activity. available to us. you have We will questions be happy regarding to provide this legislation, or you the information Sincerely, Bill Munn Executive Director JWM/mo I. Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I City of X8rth Richland Hills, Texas May 13, 1988 TO: Councilwoman Spurlock FROM: John Whitney, Director, Management Services SUBJECT: Landscaping and Decoration Breakdown Per your request, I have broken down the cost of landscaping and decorations by line item. City Hall Facility Trees Shrubs Seasonal Flowers Berms Bermuda Irrigation Pave Stone and Brick Patio $30,000 6,000 2,000 4,000 2,000 18,000 6,000 $68,000 Decorations for Library and Park Complex 12,000 Bulbs in 100 ft. Sections and 12,000 Sockets 6,000 Anchors, Anchor Wire Clips, and Screws 100 ft. Each 50 Light Strings of Mini Lights Time Clocks, Wire, Plugs Labor (includes cost of bucket truck and installation, removal, boxing and storage) $ 4,700 3,000 300 2,000 10,000 $20,000 The City Hall landscaping and irrigation costs may be distributed equally between Building Maintenance and Utility Unspecified eIP in the amount of $34,000 each. A further detail review was conducted to (817) 281..Q04117301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76180 1# Ie I I I 1 I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Page Two determine the availability of monies in the General Fund for the purchase of Christmas Decorations. The only possibility is the use of City Council's Budget Reserve for Contingency, should they choose to appropriate the necessary funds. The Christmas Decorations at this time would be marginal. It is quite possible the Decorator's will be booked up for the Christmas Season by the time I could be authorized to place an order. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, ¡.J~ J. hn H. Whitney ~ irector, Management Services JHW: smm I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 88-13 Date: May 23, 1988 Traffic Signals at FM 1938 (Davis Blvd.) and North Richland Blvd. Subject: As instructed by the Council at its meeting on April 25, 1988, the staff has contacted the District 2 office of the Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation (TDH&PT) concerning the City's request for signalization at FM 1938 (Davis Boulevard) & North Richland Boulevard. Dennis Horvath and myself met with Wallace Ewell, Supervising Traffic Engineer, on May 11,1988 and discussed the subject matter. Mr. Ewell's response is best described in the attached letter from him dated May 12, 1988. The staff request Council's direction if further action is desired. Respectfully submitted, GWD/ds ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS ......'"'~.J" - ·__~~.:L.:._:..!fn-··· . ~ . }"'~~¡¡;-.1-.:---. -,& ..~....., .' ~. ' 1 -'1 '.-'-.- ,,~."" ..;.........-...-_..~;.........~...c. ;:';:0.. -~-.. -'-~ I Ie I City of J\9rth Richland Hills, Texas I May 2, 1988 I REF: PWL-0043-88 I Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation P. O. Box 6868 Fort Worth, TX 76115-0868 817/292-6510 I Attention: Mr. J. R. Stone, District E~gineer RE: FM 1938 (Davis Boulevard) STREET IMPROVEMENTS from Emerald Hills Way to Rumfie1d Road I I Ie Mr. Stone, I The Mayor and City Council of the City of North Rich1and Hills request that the intersection of FM 1938 (Davis Bou1~vard) & North Richland Boulevard and FM 1938 & Mockingbird Lane be signalized with one controller under the referenced project. The City does not want to delay signalization of FM 1938 & . College Circle by this request, but rather ask for additional signalization under the same project at the same time. If the only obstacle ,to this request is funds for additional design work, we are willing to participate in the cost. I I I The City's reason for this request is based on the close proximity of the tp.ree side streets. There have been numerous accidents associated with these intersections. College Circle has been warranted for signalization already. North Richland Boulevard has been previously studied by your staff and shoWn to also meet the requirements for a formal warrant for signalization. I Please let us know if this will be possible. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. I Ie I I Ids cc: Mayor Dan Echols Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Asst. City Manager (817) 281.Q041"301 N.E. lOOP 8201P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76180 I I I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I_ I I ~ "--, 'D . rs ~ ~ 0 \\/7 j-~.: ¡,~:~\ ~ L5 ~ L5 \.:J ".'.' , , ' .--: ~: ~ ¡ I -: : , MAY I 6 1988 ¡ : i __.~.__J COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF IDGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Post Office Box 6868 Fort Worth, Texas 76115 (817) 292-6510, Ext. 319 May 12, 1988 ENG INEER-DIRECTOR R. E. STOTZER, JR. -.- ROBERT H. DEDMAN, CHAIRMAN JOHN R. BUTLER, JR. RAY STOKER, JR. _e_ IN REPLY REFER TO Subject: Request for a traffic signal at North Richland Boulevard and FM 1938 _~Davis Boulevard) Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P. E. Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Dear Mr. Dickens: We have reviewed your request for a traffic signal at the subject location and offer the following comments: We can certainly appreciate the fact that your City feels that the traffic on North Richland Boulevard has increased. and that the direct connection to Holiday Lane is an impor- tant consideration. We agree with your assessment that if the College Circle, North Richland and Mockingbird Lane in- tersection were to all be signalized, the three locations should be coordinated to obtain proper operation. We appreciate your willingness to participate in th~ cost of designing a signal system at North Richland and Mockingbird Lane. In response to your request, our staff has reviewed conditions at that location and we had as·ked a Traffic Engineer- ing f,irm to inspect the, site and prepare an estimate of the costs of including the additional signal work in our upcoming Project on FM 1938. That survey has been completed and the consultant's comments on the feasibility of signal- izing all three intersections have been reviewed. A copy of those comments are attached. This location has some unique problems that makes it an undesirable location for a signal. First of all, the 120 foot offset between North Richland and Mockingbird Lane makes it very difficult, if not impossible, to design a traffic signal that will allow safe and time-efficient left turns from Davis into either street. This situation is ad- ditionally complicated by the landscaped median section on Mockingbird and the presence of a large driveway on the east side of Davis, opposite North Richland. Another serious consideration is the short distance between College Circle and the North Richland/Mockingbird Lane intersections. I " Ie I I I I I I I Ie II :1 I I I I Ie I I 'ø Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, P. E. Page 2 May 12, 1988 In my opinion, the signalization of both College Circle and North Richland is not required because traffic using either intersection has the option to use Ross street, located just west of Davis, to reach their destinations. It should also be noted that a signal at College Circle would create gaps in the traffic on Davis, providing opportunities for left turns into or out of North Richland and Mockingbird Lane. If this matter was a simple choice of deciding between two geometrically equal intersections, we would readily approve your request. However, due to the serious safety consider- ations explained above, I must recommend against attempting to signalize the North Richland Boulevard/ Mockingbird Lane intersection. I recommend that we proceed with the plans to install a signal at College Circle and that motorists be encouraged to use Ross street as an alternate route. You may also want to consider the possibility of prohibiting eastbound traffic on North Richland from turning left at Davis. This turn could be accomplished safely from College Circle when it is signalized. - If the North Richland/Mockingbird Lane intersections is later revised to obtain a direct alignment, further consideration of the installation of a signal at this location and the removal of the signal at College Circle would be ~ppropriate. I understand your concern about this situation and I regret that we cannot approve your request. S~relYI wall~~ lç;t Supervising Traffic Engineer WEE/sme Attachment II .' Ie I II I II I II I lie I I I I I II Ie I I « A word is in order about the advisability of installing a traffic signal at this intersection. We have not been provided with traffic counts and, because our site visit was made today (Saturday), we are not sure which leg of North Richland Hills Drive - Mockingbird Road requires signaliza- tion, if any. However, certain facts are clear simply from the geometry of the area. This intersection is a very short block south of the College Circle intersection for which we have already designed a signal. If the reason for signalizing this intersection is only traffic on the west leg, then no signal should be installed. There is a good, short connection between North Richland Hills Drive and College Circle just one block to the west. This will enable the College Circle signal to serve all of the traffic to and from the west. If it is the east leg that requires signal- ization, then only the east leg should be signalized. Left turns into and out of the west leg should be prohibited and handled by the College Circle signal. This is because of the unfavorable offset in the east and west legs. There will be no acceptable way to handle left turns from both the north and the south if both legs are signalized. .~ Such signalization would also unnecessarily reduce the storage for left turns at College Circle. Please share these com- ments with the SDHPT. We will be happy to discuss them with the SDHPT if they wish. Attachment: Extract from consultant's evaluation of ~ortll Richland boulevard and FM-1938 I Ie I- I I I I ..1. c.oW\-\-s ~J=-Mð.r~:':'8"_ _ .!, Co~t\+s m~Je Novep\~e.... '87 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I · ~o//e It!. C¡rG)e II,Sql I >- IZ,7l.0 I : ~ T oiAL V£J..+f¿LE-S PEt<. DA-'-( @ TeA-FFIC. ACt:..IDIE:Nì5 (LA~'- 12 M-:>""Tik=) @ t 115.,7.41 -, ---- >- @ ~. ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ;- .. @ ------ < LA I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 88-12 '\)fk Date: -=]?~-=- Subject: May 23, 1988 Use of New Pre-Council Meeting Room Over the past few weeks I have contacted each of you to ask your opinion regarding guidelines for use of the new Pre-Council Meeting Room. The results of my survey are as follows: The majority of the Council felt the room should not be used as a work-room such as contractor meetings~ audito~s" bid openings~ f~ tc ~ '!'" Most Council Members felt it should bi? used' :only for the Pre-Council Meetings' and staff (Line-Horvath) Two Council Members feit any Board/Commission should be able to use the room for pre-meetings. Others did not express an opinion. This subject has been listed on the Pre-Council Agenda for discussion, following which we will draft a policy for the Council's consideration based on the consensus. Respectfully submitted, nAA"£~ ~: Rewis City Secretary JR/ph ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NOATH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY.' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST lOOP 820 - MAY 9, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CAll TO ORDER Mayor Echols called the meeting to order May 9, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. Present: Dan Echols Dick Fisher Richard Davis Marie Hinkle Mack Garvin Virginia Moody Jim Ramsey Linda Spurlock Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Richard Albin Mayor Echols gave the invocation. 2. ROll CALL Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer 3. INVOCATION 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING APRIL 25, 1988 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the minutes of the April 25, 1988 meeting. Motion carried 6-0; Councilwoman Hinkle abstaining due to absence from the meeting. Councilman Davis asked for Point-of-Privilege. Councilman Davis asked that the plaques for the outgoing Council Members be moved to this point in the Agenda. Mr. Line, City Manager, presented Mayor Echols, Councilman Ramsey and Councilwoman Moody with a plaque for their faithful years of service on the Council. I Ie I I I I I I' I Ie I I I !I I I Ie I I May 9, 1988 Page 2 5. GN 88-31 CANVASSING MUNICIPAL ELECTION _ RESOLUTION NO. 88-13 APPROVED Mayor Echols presented the following resolution: "WHEREAS, an Election was duly held in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, on the 7th day of May, 1988 to elect a Mayor and Council Places 2, 4, and 6; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council duly canvassed the votes of said election on this the 9th day of May, 19ª8; and WHEREAS, the canvass showed the following results: Candidates Office Total Jim Ramsey Mayor 679 Tommy Brown 773 Mack Garvin Council Place 2 1,073 Curtis Pruden 251 Virginia Moody Council Place 4 629 Frank Metts, Jr. 771 Byron Sibbet Council Place 6 840 Gene Riddle 537 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HIllS, TEXAS, that: 1. The above canvass be ànd the same hereby is in all things approved. 2. The Council finds that the following candidates should be declared elected to the office indicated: Offi ce Duly Elected Official Tommy Brown Mack Garvin Frank Metts, Jr. Byron Sibbetll Mayor Council Place 2 Council Place 4 Council Place 6 Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve Resolution No. 88-13. Motion carried 7-0. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I May 9, 1988 Page 3 6. GN 88-32 OATH OF OFFICE Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City, administered the following Oath of Office to Tommy Brown, Mack Garvin, Frank Metts, Jr. and Byron Sibbet: "I, , do solemnly swear (or affirm), that I will faithfully execute the duties of the office of (City Councilman/Councilwoman or Mayor) of the City of North Richland Hills, State of Texas, and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this State; and I furthermore solemnly swear (or affirm) that I have not directly paid, offered, or promised to pay, contributed nor promised to contribute any money, or valuable thing, or promised any public office or employment as a reward for the giving or withholding a vote at the election at which I was elected. So help me God.1I 7. GN 88-33 ELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEM Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, Jo elect Councilman Dick Fisher as Mayor Pro Tern by acclamation. Motion carried 7-0. 8. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Garvin removed Item No. 20 and Councilman Davis removed Item No. 26. 9. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (25, 28, 29, 30, 31 & 32) APPROVED Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Fisher, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to move Item No. 24 to this point in the Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. 24. GN 88-37 PRESENTATION OF 1986-87 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I May 9, 1988 Page 4 Mr. Clyde Womack and Mr. Jake Murrah, representing Peat Marwick Main and Co., presented the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, for fiscal year ending September 30, 1986, to the Council. Mr. Womack advised that the City had also received the Certificate of Achievement of Excellence in Financial Management Reporting. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to accept the report. Motion carried 7-0. 10. PZ 88-3 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ APPEAL HEARING - REQUÉST OF RICHMOND BAY DEVELOPMENT CO. TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 2, W.A. TRIMBLE SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1520, FROM R-2 TO R-8. (LOCATED ON SOUTH SIDE OF MEADOW lAKES DRIVE AND WEST OF DORY COURT) Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Marion Massey, representing Richmond Bay Development, appeared before the Council. Mr. Massey advised that this zoning request was for the property located west of the dam. Mr. Massey stated they would build 2,000 square foot_ minimum houses. Mr. Massey stated the development would have a guard -gate at the entrance and it would be surrounded by a brick and wrought iron fence. Councilwoman Spurlock stated that according to the Planning and Zoning Minutes the fence would be around the development except for Lqts 3 and 4. Mr. Massey stated that homes were already built at the back of lots 3 and 4, however if it was alright with the existing homeown~rs the fence would also be placed there. Councilwoman Spurlock asked if a stipulation of 2,000 square foot houses could be placed on the zoning. Mr. McEntire replied yes. Councilwoman Hinkle asked if the houses were to be built by builders. Mr. Bob Frank, co-owner, stated the homes would be built by builders and individuals with strict architectural guidelines¡ Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. Mr. Jack Mayberry, 6405 Riviera, appeared before the Council. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I ,I I I Ie I I May 9, 1988 Page 5 Mr. Mayberry stated that R-8 zoning called for 1,200 square ,foot houses, but he had no objection to 2,000 square foot houses. Mr. Mayberry asked if someone could rezone to R-8 on the adjoining property without a 2,000 square foot stipulation on the houses. Mayor Brown stated they would have to appear before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Council to have the property zoned R-8. Councilman Davis stated he felt the 2,000 square foot stipulation would be a good precedence. Councilman Garvin stated he felt this would be a good development for the area. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. 11. ORDINANCE NO. 1540 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No. 1540 with the stipulation of 2,000 square foq~ houses and a brick wall with wrought iron fence surrounding the development. Motion carried 7-0. Mr. Charles Scoma appeared before the Council. Mr. Scoma stated he felt the lots were too small for 2,000 square foot homes. Councilman Davis stated the developer would have to make the lots large enough to meet all building requirements. 12. PZ 88-4 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF BLAIR PLUMBING COMPANY INC., TO REZONE THE SOUTH TWO HUNDRED FEET OF LOT 1, COLLEGE ACRES ADDITION FROM C-2 TO OC. (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD SOUTH OF GREEN VALLEY DRIVE) Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Glenn Blair, owner, appeared before the Council. Mr. Blair stated this zoning request was to bring the existing business into compliance. Councilwoman Spurlock stated she would like to see a screening fence built around the property. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I May 9, 1988 Page 6 Mr. Blair stated that as soon as the zoning was approved he ,intended to build a screening fence. Councilman Garvin stated that there seemed to be a problem with the platting of the property. Mr. Blair stated that as soon as the zoning was approved he would start the platting process. Councilman Sibbet asked what the height of the fence would be. Mr. Blair stated he would erect a six to eight foot sight barring fence. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing tQ speak in opposition to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. 13. ORDINANCE NO. 1541 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No. 1541 with the stipulation that a 6 foot sight barring fence be erected. Motion carried 7-0. 14. PZ 88-5 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ , REQUEST OF RICHMOND BAY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY TO REZONE TRACTS OUT OF THE W.A. TRIMBLE SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1520 AND THE HEIRS OF S. SAWYER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1425, FROM R-2, R-6T AND OC TO R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY). (LOCATED ON SOUTH SIDE OF MEADOW LAKES DRIVE' IN THE MEADOW LAKES SUBDIVISION) . Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor to please come forward. Mr. Marion Massey, representing Richmond Bay Development, appeared before the Council. Mr. Massey stated this property was in the golf course area. Mr. Massey stated they had received at least fifteen offers on the golf course, but nothing final. Mr. Massey stated they had been advised that a golf course could not be built unless it was done by the City. Mr. Massey stated they were asking the City to rezone the property into phases so they could get started on Phase I. Mr. Massey stated that if Phase I took effect on a particular date the City and all other golf course developers would have time to get plans and financing in place prior to the time that any of the residential development would hinder or interfere with the existing golf I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I II I I Ie I I May 9, 1988 Page 7 course plans. Mr. Mass~ stated the developer was ready to begin Phase I which was on the extreme eastern end. Mr. Massey stated that until Phase I was half or more underway, there would be no interference with the present golf course architectural plans. Mr. Massey advised this rezoning would do away with all of the multi-family zoning in the project. Mayor Pro Tem Fisher asked if Phase I was started and the golf course came about would the developer shut Phase I down. Mr. Massey stated that if Phase I was completely developed it would not torpedo the golf course but would shorten the fairway on one particular hole and might change it from a par 4 to a par 3. Mr. Massey stated if only one-half of Phase I was developed it would not interfere with the present plans for the golf course. Mr._Massey stated Phase II would have to be completed before the golf course became a questionable factor. Mayor Pro Tem Fisher asked if Phase I would be shut down if the golf course came through. Mr. Massey stated Phase I would not be shut down because it fit very well with the golf course configuration. Mr. Line stated Phase I would begin developing at the eastern end and proceed in a westerly fashion. Mr. Line asked that if the 'City advised that a golf course was going to be built before Phase I was finished, would part of Phase I be available to the City to incorporate into the golf course or would the developer want to complete Phase I. - Mr. Massey stated that if the City was committed to the golf course before Phase I encroached on it then they would cease construction. Councilman Sibbet asked how long it would be before the half-way point was reached once Phase I was started. Mr. Massey stated Phase II would become effective in October so if the developer moved very fast Phase I would be finished by October 1st. Mr. Massey stated that Phase I consisted of only 25 lots. Mr. Bob Frank advised that th~ only planned to submit a plat for nine lots at the next Council Meeting. Councilman Davis stated that actually Phase I was really going to have two phases - if the first nine lots were developed and sold in nine days the developer would do the next phase. Councilman Davis stated that if the nine lots did not sell then the developer would not develop any more until later on. Mr. Frank stated that was correct. Councilman Davis stated the City should know by October whether or not they were going to be involved in a joint venture, with some outside management building firm, to build a golf course. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I May 9, 1988 Page 8 Mr. Massey stated he felt it was to the developer's advantage to participate in the area near the golf course. Councilman Metts asked when the City began working on the plans for the golf course and could it be done in six months. Mr. Line stated the City had been working on the golf course very intensely, off and on, with the owners and developers of Meadow Lakes for four years. Mr. Line stated that as of March 23, 1988 the golf course became Mr. Sanford's number one priority. Mr. Line stated that Mr. Sanford and the Attorney for the City had been working on a request for proposals. Mr. Line stated that these requests would be sent to those who had expressed interest. Mr. Line stated they would be asked to comment on the proposals. Mr. Line stated that wh~n the proposals were received back, modifications, that were appropriate, would be made and submitted back to everyone who was interested. Mr. Line stated the City would give them a deadline of July 30th to submit proposals to the City on how they would go about developing the golf course. Mr. Line stated that would give the Council and Staff three months to evaluate and determine whether or not it would be feasible to proceed with the golf course. Mr. Line stated that by October 1st the City would know whether or not they could develop a golf course. Mayor Pro Tem Fisher asked if there would be some encroachment on the proposed golf course if Phase I was developed, and even more if Phase II was developed. Mr. Massey stated that if Phase II was finished there would be no real _ problems with developing the golf course with the present land configuration. Mayor Pro Tem Fisher asked if there was any reason to put an effective. date on Phase IV if the golf course was out of the picture at that time. Mr. Frank stated the golf course would be out of the question for that area but there would still be enough property in other areas to do it. Mayor Pro Tem Fisher asked if there would be enough property left after Phase III was developed. Mr. Frank stated yes, but not in the same area. Mr. Line stated he felt the City would know well in advance of Phase II whether or not the golf course could be done. Mr. line stated the developer had advised the City tonight that they would surrender any part they had not yet developed, even in Phase I, for the City to incorporate into the golf course. Mr. Massey stated he would like to clarify one thing that Mr. Line said: at such point as the City knew that the golf coursp was a certainty then the developer would surrender whatever was left of Phase I, consistent with the original plans. Mr. Massey stated the developer would surrender what was left of Phase I consistent with the golf course plan and configuration. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I May 9, 1988 Page 9 Mr. Line asked if the developer started with nine lots in Phase I, and that was all that had been developed at such time when the City said they were going to build the golf course, then would that be all that would be developed in Phase I. Mr. Massey stated that was correct. Councilwoman Hinkle asked that if the second part of Phase II was developed, could there still could be a golf course but with less area than the original plan. Mr. Massey stated that until Phase II was completed the concept of the golf course, as it now stands, was not destroyed. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing tõ speak in opposition to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Davis stated he wanted everyone to understand that the Council was going to vote on five ordinances with different effective dates. Councilman Davis stated that essentially what the citizens that lived in Meadow Lakes were being told was that if the ordinances did-pass, and if for some reason by October 1st the City had not come to a conclusion with a management contract for building and managing the golf course, there probably would not be one. Councilman Davis stated the developer had tried many outside groups to come in and build a golf course and they - could not feasibly do it. Councilman Davis stated the developer had been very cooperative with the City and the decision made tonight would kill a golf course unless the City was able to put together a package by June 30th. 15. ORDINANCE NO. 1542 (PHASE I) APPROVED Councilman Hinkle moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Fisher, to approve Ordinance No. 1542. Motion carried 7-0. 16. ORDINANCE NO. 1543 (PHASE II) APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No. 1543. Motion carried 7-0. 17. ORDINANCE NO. 1544 (PHASE III) APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I May 9, 1988 Page 10 Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Fisher, to approve Ordinance No. 1544. Motion carried 7-0. 18. ORDINANCE NO. 1545 (PHASE IV) APPROVED Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 1545. Motion carried 7-0. 19' . ORDINANCE NO. 1546 (PHASE V) APPROVED Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No. 1546. Motion carried 7-0. 20. GN 88-30 TEEN COURT - ORDINANCE NO. 1539 TABLED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to table Ordinance No. 1539 to the May 23, 1988 Council Meeting. Motion carried 7-0. 21. ~ . GN 88-34 PUBLIC HEARING ON MARTIN DRIVE ASSESSMENTS Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. Mr. Greg Dickens, Public Works Director, appeared as a witness. Mr. Dickens explained the scope of the Martin Drive Street and Drainage project. Mr. Dickens explained the formula for the assessment and introduced in evidence the preliminary assessment rolls and the final revised assessment rolls. Mr. John Lutz, appeared as a witness. Mr. Lutz testified as to his credentials as a real estate appraiser in North Richland Hills. Mr. Lutz testified that he had explained the final revised assessment rolls and had done a study of each tract and the impact of the Martin Drive Project on each tract on the rolls. Mr. Lutz testified that in his opinion the Martin Drive Project would give special benefit to each tract on the roll of at least the amount of each I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I May 9, 1988 Page 11 assessment. Mr. Lutz answered questions from the Council as'to how he arrived at his conclusion. During his testimony Mr. Dickens answered questions from the Council concerning the formula for assessment and the special benefits to the various categories of land involved. The Attorney for the City announced that the Department of Public Works had completed its presentation. The Mayor called for those property owners who objected to the assessments to come forward and be heard. The first witness to appear was Mr. Charles Scoma. Mr. Scoma stated he did not own or have an interest in any property affected by the assessment. Mr. Scoma had objections to the City policy dealing with assessments and suggested appointment of a Council Committee to study the general assessment program. The individual Council Members, the Attorney for the City, and the Engineer answered questions raised by Mr. Scoma. Mr. Scoma traced a portion of the history of the 1985 bond issue and at this point the Mayor asked Mr. Scoma to direct his remarks to the issue involved in the hearing. Mr. Scoma concluded by stating that he felt there was unfairness in the assessment system, generally, and that it should be studied by a committee. Mr. Oscar Oggier appeared before the Council. Mr. Oggier opposed the assessment placed on Unit No. 29. Mr. David Barfield appeared before the Council. Mr. Barfield stated he did not have a problem with the assessment, but he would like to have three drive approaches. Mr. Barfield stated he had talked with the ,Staff and had been advised he was only allowed two openings. Councilman Davis advised Mr. Barfield that if he had a site pldn available, bring it to the next CIP Committee Meeting and they would see if something could be worked out. Mr. Jack Roseberry, 8912 Martin Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Roseberry stated he just wanted to let the City know that he was glad to get the road fixed. Ms. Walter Silay, 8612 Martin Road, appeared before the Council. Ms. Silay stated she had paid $358.00 for water and wanted to know if she would be refunded. Mr. Albin advised the assessment was for street, curb and gutter and not for water. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I II I I Ie I I May 9, 1988 Page 12 22. GN 88-35 DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR IMPROVEMENTS ON MARTIN DRIVE _ ORDINANCE NO. 1536 APPROVED Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Fisher, to approve Ordinance No. 1536. Motion carried 7-0. Councilman Garvin left the meeting. 23'. GN 88-36 CLOSING HEARING AND lEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENTS OF MARTIN DRIVE - ORDINANCE NO. 1537 APPROVED Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Fisher, to approve Ordinance No. 1537. Motion carried 7-0. 24. PRESENTATION OF 1986-87 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Moved to beginning of Agenda. *25. GN 88-38 IMPOSING GROSS RECEIPTS TAX ON BINGO _ ORDINANCE NO. 1547 APPROVED 26. GN 88-39 AUTHORIZATION OF $31,260.32 "TURNOVERII TO DAVID BARFIELD DECLINED Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, that in view of the uncertainties involved in connection with the Precinct Line Road Project, as well as the rights and identities of the parties, that the City respectfully decline to comply with the Turnover Order served upon it on May 4, 1988 in Cause No. 249-108-87, 249th District Court, and direct the City Attorney to contest the Order. Motion carried 7-0. 27. PU 88-26 LANDSCAPING AND CHRISTMAS DECORATION TABLED I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I May 9, 1988 Page 13 Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to table PU 88-26. Motion carried 7-0. *28. PU 88-27 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY - FROM EARL D. REGION, ETUX OLETA L. REGION FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING MARTIN DRIVE (PARCEL NO.5) APPROVED *29. PU 88-28 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM MARY B. OGGIER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING MARTIN DRIVE (PARCEL NO. 11) APPROVED *30. PU 88-29 APPROVE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FROM CARL A. WATERS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING MACKEY CREEK IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II (PARCEL NO.1) APPROVED *31. PU 88-30 APPROVAL TO PURCHASE LOT 102, BLOCK 4, NORTH HILLS ADDITION ~ APPROVED *32. PW 88-13 APPROVAL OF WATAUGA ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 APPROVED 33. CITIZENS PRESENTATIONS None 34. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 7-0. ATTEST: Mayor City Secretary ~0~~Y:"'~:~"-'- - ~~~~-';'~·l ~-, 'I"V.::(' ""''!'(:11''''''~'''', <""<,""~:' ,'~ "', r'i, = ?<', ',.' ",,',,~Y ',",0, ," I' >... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I ~epartment: Economic Development Subject: 5/23/88 - Council Meeting Date: Request of Americity Corporations for Appeal Hearing PZ 88-6 on Zonl.ng AppJ.icatl.on ~z öö-6 Agenda Number: I I I I I On May 12, 1988, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on Zoning Application PZ 88-6 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract lAl and lA7, Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399 from AG Agriculture to C-I Commercial. The subject property is located on the south side of Bursey Road east of Rufe Snow Drive. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the request for rezoning be denied. The applicant is requesting that the City Council grant an appeal of that denial. In order to meet the required public notice schedule the earliest date for hearing would be on June 20, 1988. RECOMMENDATION: I I I ,I ~I I I I :1 It is recommended that the City Council grant the requested appeal on Zoning Application PZ 88-6 and establish June 20, 1988 as the hearing date. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Op~rating Bud t Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I I ent Head Signature /J ~ KtJJ~ City Manager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I ~ *- LI ~ TM AMERICITY FEDERAL CORPORATION tM May 13, 1988 Mr. Richard Royston Director of Planning and Development City of North Richland Hills, Texas 7301 N.E. Loop 820 P. o. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Re: Zoning Case iPZ 88-6 Tracts 1A1 + 1A7, Thomas Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1399 Dear Mr. Royston: This letter serves as our notice of appeal of the decision made on May 12, 1988 by the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning the above captioned zoning case. I will be out of town until the week of May 23rd at which time I will contact your office and the neighbors to formulate a consensus for this property and schedule my appeal hearing. In the meantime, would you please send to me the following information: 1. Name, address and phone number of persons who spoke against the requested zoning at the May 12 hearing. ,,' 2. l'1wnber of notices mailed by your office to the surrounding ne·i'ghbo'rhood 'with a tally of responses received, if any. 3. Name, address and phone number of the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Thank you very much for your continued cooperation and support. .~ SRS / lkk 750 N. ST. PAUL. SUITE 1500 DALLAS. TEX.-\S 75201 214/922·0166 I I I I I I FISCO 302696 ~ ~1{,..;',' ....c._.-~~, '''''0 pz- ~2- ¿ BVRJE;I1' /?IJ~¿J FA.rr 21-0 f! ,~ , '" ,~ þ\ --I .Na ~N ~ o ~~'~? ~¿r /f/ 8' ..,.., -' 200~ .. Pl-ffl~' øl# 4Li$/"'N/~¿" . " " " () . () ~ '/ 1) ~ ~ 7.) A C¡('~S ..., , h S 87-48 ()~ W 3S-31 FIELD NOTES FOR: ZONING PIJRPOSES ONLY BEING a tract of land out of the THOMAS SPROUSE SURVEY, Abstract 1399 in Tarrant County, Texas, aand being a part of the same tract of land recorded in Volume 2072, Page 528, Deed Reco~ds, Tarrant County, Texas and being described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin in the South line of Bursey Road (County Road No. 4093), said iron pin is 30 feet South and 1475.43 feet West from the Northeast corner of said survey; . . '-'........ THENCE South 0 degrees 06 minutes 11 seconds East 924.0 feet: THENCE South 87 deqrees 48 minutes 54 seconds West 353 3 feet; THENCE North 8 degrees 52 minutes 11 seconds West 694.S feet; THENCE East 260.0 feet; THENCE North 0 degrees 23 minutes 25 seconds West 250.3 feet; THENCE North 89 degrees 41 minutes 57 seconds East 200.0 feet to the place of beginning and containing 7.5 acres of land, more or less. SCALE 1" = ZDO LEGEND . 'RON PtN o IRON PIPE 6. BOtS O'ARC STAKE. C CONCRETE MON ---x-x- FENCE -"-"- POWER LINE - T - T - TELEPHONE LINE -CATV - CABLE TELEVIStON SHADED AREA OSStGNATES CONCRETE LOVD BRANSOM SURVEYORS INC. CHARLES 8 HOOKS JR. REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR 1028 NORTH SYLVANIA AVE. FT. WORTH, TEXAS 76111 834-3477 88-335 DATE tOO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP IS TRUE AND CORRECT AS SURVEYED ON THE GROUND, AND THERE ARE NO E.-sEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS V'5IBlE. OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ~Å./(~ 4-5-88 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I tiepartment: Subject: I I I Economic Development 5/23/88 _ Council Meeting Date: Request of Burk Collins Investments and Sonic IndustriepJ_ d N b l.nc. tor Kepl.at of Lots 1 t:hrough 4, Block :3, Culp Add~ a urn er: PS 88-2 This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lots 1 through 4, Block 3, Culp Addition. The subject property is located on the southeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Northeast Parkway. The property is currently zoned 1-2 Industrial. A portion of the existing lot has been sold to the Sonic Drive-Ins and the plat proposes to configure the lots to match the current ownership lines. The Sonic Drive-In is to be located on the proposed Lot 1. The Staff has been working with the applicants related to the access locations for the lots fronting on Davis Boulevard. The Staff noted to the Commission that the proposed plat included a mutual access easement located on the common property line between Lots 1 and 2. This is the location for the single driveway which has been approved for the Davis frontage. The mutual access easement/drive will also provide access for the proposed Lot 3 which faces Northeast Parkway. The Staff also noted that the applicants will not be required to provide improvements to their frontage along Davis Boulevard since the SDHPT is currently developing plans for major improvements along the Highway. However, the City is responsible for the costs of the curb and gutter to be installed as a part of that project. The applicants have agreed' to enter into a covenant with the City to pay the costs of the curb and gutter along their frontage as a condition of the development. ~ ~ll of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Replat Application PS 88-2 for Lots 1 through 4, Block 3, Culp Addition as submitted. The Commission and Staff would recommend City Council approval of the submitted plat. ~ Source of Funds: I Bonds (GO/Rev.) 1 e gi:~~tin, c1.dget Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available 1211/ ~ Head Signature I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 10f 1 I-I R-3 1090 I I I " I I , I I ' \ \, \ , \ , \ " , , AG I-I SU o I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS MAY 12, 1988 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order b Chairman, George Tucker, at 7: ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Vice Chairman Members George Tucker John Schwinger Mark Wood Don Bowen David Barfield Ron Lueck Manny Tricoli C.A. Sanford Richard Royston Wanda Calvert Member Economic Dev. Dir. Planning/Dev. p & Z Coordinator ABSENT: Carole Flippo F THE MINUTES , 1988 Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 6-0 with Mr. Tricoli abstaining since he was not present at the meeting. 1. PS 88-2 Request of Burk Collins & Sonic Industries, Inc. for replat of Lots 1-4, Block 3, Culp Addition. PS 88-2 APPRO~D Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 88-2. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tricol! and the motion carried 7-0. 2. PZ 88-2 Request of Leonard Hazel"Bob F.G. Stimmel, and A.I. Skur rezone Tracts 4P3, 4P 1, & 4P2, A.G. Walker Su , Abstract 1630, the south Ii ot 11, Block 1, J.M. E ubdivision, and Lot 8, Block 1, enry Addition, from their present classifications of C-2 Commercial and R-7-MF Multi-Family to 1-2 Industrial. This property is located south of Glenvíew Drive between Flory Street and Scruggs Drive. .,.....,,, 1°' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I !I I I Ie I I ( ( JOHN D. ZIMMERMAN P.E., R.P.S. REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR 2308 ROOSEVELT DR. UNIT C ARLINeTON. T~XAS 78018 (817) 481-0188 May 4, 1988 City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Public Works Department Attn: Kevin Miller P.E., Assistant Director of Public Works Re: PS 88-2, Culp Addition, Lots 1-4, Block 3-Final Plat & Plan. Dear Kevin; The following action was taken in response to the letter of comments on the subject plat and plans. Item 1 - Added cover sheet. Item 2 - Removed fire lane" Item 3 - Title block revised. Item 4 - Note revised. Item 5 - The fire lane has not been shown at this time. Sonic is presently making minor changes in the parking and driving lanes. The site plan will be resubmitted upon receipt of the site revisions from Sonic. It is my understanding that Don Shemwell and the Sonic people have met with Building Inspections "'1:'0 resol.ve the problems. Item 6 - I have enclosed a cut sheet from Dalworth Quikset Co. for the type of grate inlet specified. Item 7 - Flow arrows have been added and there is no down stream impact on the drainage. Item 8 - Reference to replat removed. Item 9 - Manhole shown. I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I ( ( It.em 10 - Taps indicated. Item 11 - Stub out shown in plan and profile and elevation shown. Item 12 - Added note. Item 13 - Provided 4" clearance between asphalt & RCP. Item 14 - Added toe wall. Item 15 - Added sand cushion. Item 16 - Added note. Item 17 - The coordination of relocating guy wire will be done if required. It appears that it should not need to be relocated. Item 18 - Add seal and signature as required. Item 19 - Renumbered sheets. Item 20 - Covenantns submitted by owners for signature and will be submitted with final plat submittal. Item 21 - The fees will be paid by the owners. I assume this is required before the taps can be made. Should you have any questions please advise. Sincere~ _~ ~Zi~man P.E.,R.P.S. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I ( ( City of J{8rth Richland Hills, Texas May 2, 1988 REF: PWM-0037-88 Memo to: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Kevin Miller, P.E. Assistant Director of Public Works Subject: PS 88-2; CULP ADDITION Lots 1, 2, 3 & 4, Block 3 - Final Plat and Plans We have reviewed the referenced material and offer the following comments. Cover Sheet 1. Provide cover sheet with signature block for approved plans. (Attached) Plat 2. Remove all reference to "fire lane". Fire lanes are only shown on site plan. 3. Revise title block as indicated. Site Plan 4. Revise note #4 to read: "Culverts, drains and elevations as detailed and per local conditions and requirements." Only a temporary asphalt connection to Davis Boulevard is required. 5. Show fire lane (coordinate with Fire Marshal). Drainage Map ~- Verify-grate inlet 36 inches square cO:1tains 8.09 square ,feet of grate opening. 7. Provide note with flow arrows indicating direction of overflow and impact downstream, if any. ,Utility Layout 8. Remove note indicating this sheet as a "Replat of Lots 1, 2, 3 & 4, Block 3 ..." 9. Show manhole between 6" sanitary sewer line and sanitary sewer service at the northest corner of Lot 1. 10. Indicate all taps and connections to be installed under this contract. (817) 281.Q04117301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 76180 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I CULP ADDITION , Page 2 May 2, 1988 ( ( Sanitary Sewer Line 11. Indicate stubout in plan view and indicate flowline at the plug on the profile. Grading Plan 12. Add note to horizontally adjust flume north to avoid existing water valve box. 13. Verify new 21" RCP has sufficient clearance under new asphalt drive. 14. Add 6" x 18" deep toe wall at the end of the flume. 15. Add sand cushion under flume. 16. Adjust note to correctly identify "Proposed 6" Sanitary Sewer Line" and show end of stubout. 17. Coordinate relocation of guy wire at the south property line. General 18. Add engineer/surveyor's seal, date and signature to all sheets as applicable. 19. Renumber sheets and provide cover sheet. 20. Provide covenants from owners to collect future pro rata for street improvements. 21. Collect the following fees: a) Water Service Connection _ Depends on meter size b) ,Water tap fee - Depends on line size c) Sewer Service Connection - $305 per tap and $50 for connection to existing stub d) Deposit for water meter - Minimum $75 + $5 service charge e) Sewer System Extension - 3% Inspection Fee f) Sewer System Access Fee - Depends on size of water meter I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I CULP ADDITION Page 3 May 2, 1988 ( ( The comments contained herein do not purport to relinquish the design engineer from his responsibility to provide adequate, accurate, buildable construction plans, nor does approval of the construction plans signify acceptance of responsibility by the City of North Richland Hills for the engineering contained in the bid documents. ~z~L Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Ids cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Greg Dickens, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I _Department: Subject: I I I I Municipal Court Teen Court - Ordinance No. 1539 Postponed 5-9-88 - Council Meeting Date: 5-23-88 GN 88-30 Agenda Number: As you recall, the Council approved the Teen Court concept based on JUdge Thorn's previous presentation to the Council. Teen Court is an alternative program for teenage defendants who have violations filed in the Municipal Court. By establishing a Teen Court in North Richland Hills our young citizens will be afforded an opportunity to "pay" for their wrongs while at the same time contributing to the overall well being of our community. Implementation of the Teen Court program in North Richland Hills would require action by the City Council by way of officially endorsing and authorizing the program. Additionally, the City Council would need to appoint a Teen Court Advisory Board to oversee the operation of the Teen Court. The costs for implementation and operation of Teen Court is relatively small since all of the time spent in operation and administration of Teen Court will be volunteered. However, because of legislation which allows the charging of a fee not to exceed $10.00 per defendant who requests to go through the Teen Court alternative, the entire estimated costs can be recouped through the collection of this fee. Recommendation: ~t is recommended that the City Council authorize the implementation of the Teen Court ~rogram and approve Ordinance No. 1539. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available - Operating Budget . Other _ ~ é£~dWYJ;~~ t,; - ¡e fl Department Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I_ I I ORDINANCE NO. 1539 BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. There is hereby established "The Teen Court of North Richland Hills, Texas". 2. There is hereby established "The Teen Court Advisory Board" for the City. The said "Board" shall be composed of five persons each of whom shall be a resident of the City of North Richland Hills. The term of office for sa i d "Board sha 11 be from one year from May 15th unti 1 the following May 15th. The appointees for the first year are as follows: Place 1 Anthony Scoma High School Student 'Place 2 Dennis Horvath Sponsor Place 3 Becky Thorne-Sutton Sponsor Place 4 Cindy Martin General Public Place 5 Dan Echols General Public 3. It shall be the duty of the Municipal Judge of the City to nominate persons to serve on said "Board" by May 1st of each year. The appointments to said Board shall be m~de by the City Council from nominations.made by the Municipal Judge or on motion of the Council if it rejects one or more of the Judge's nomination. 4. Place 1 on the Board shall be filled from the list of North Richland Hills residents who are students at Richland High School. Places 2 and 3 on the Board shall be filled from a list of persons who are connected with the Teen, Court Program as Sponsors which list shall be kept by the Municipal Judge. Place 4 and 5 on the Board shall be filled by appointing residents from the general public. 5. The function of the Board created by this ordinance shall be to approve practices and procedurès of the Teen Court which are initia11y drawn and promulgated by the Municipal Judge. After such practices and procedures have been approved by the Board, the Municipal Court shall enter its order officially adopting same as the "Rules of The Teen Court of North Richland Hills". I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Ordinance No. 1539 Page Two 6. In the event that any matter arises in the operation of The Teen Court which is not covered by the said "Rules", the Municipal Judge is given the discretion to rule on such matter. Final interpretation of the "Rules" shall be within the province of the Municipal Court. PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of May, 1988. _: Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I ~epartment: Public Works Subject: C·, M . D t 5/23/88 - ouncl eetlng a e: Endorsement of the Outline of Legislative Strategy for Clean Air Act, Resolution No. B8-14 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I Agenda Number: GN 88-40 NCTCOG's Air Quality Advisory Committee recommends that the City endorse the "Outline of Legislative Strategy for Clean Air Act" as attached. The approval of Resolution No. 88-14 will provide this endorsement as well as help present a unified position from this region on the air quality issue. The attached transmittal letter from NCTCOG further clarifies the reason for the endorsement request. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 88-14. Finance Review Acct. Number N/A ~Cient Funds Available R~~ City Manager Source of Funds: _ Bonds (GO/Rev.) . Operating Budget Oth r . Finance Director Paae 1 of 1 I 1_ I I I I I I I 1_ I I I I I I Ie I I .. RESOLUTION NO. 88-14 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: WHEREAS, the Federal Clean Air Act deadlines, without extension by Congress, will expire on August 31, 1988; and WHEREAS, the Federal Clean Air Act is essential to continued improvement to air quality in North Central Texas and the nation; and WHEREAS, there are currently numerous proposals in Congress to amend as well as extend the Federal Clean Air Act; and WHEREAS, each proposal would have a significant impact on the ability of the North Central Texas area to maintain and improve air quality while providing for meaningful economic development; and WHEREAS, the North Central Texas area has been and remains in nonattainment of the ozone standard thereby retaining the potential of federal funding sanctions; and WHEREAS, the Executive Board of the North Central Texas Council of Governments has formally adopted a general legislative outline of principles which would, if incorporated into the Federal Clean Air Act, provide meaningful improvement to air quality and ongoing economic development; and WHEREAS, the City òf North Richland Hills and the North Central Texas area will be significantly affected by any, change in the Federal' Clean Air Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED: SECTION I That the Outline of Legislative Strategy for Clean Air Act, adopted by the Executive Board of the North Central Texas Council of Governments on January 28, 1988, is hereby endorsed and adopted as a statement of legislative principles. SECTION 2 That the City Manager or designee is hereby authorized, in conjunction with other governmental entities, elected officials and 'other similarly interested organizations, to encourage the adoption by Congress of an extension and amendment to the Federal Clean Air Act which provides for meaningful improvements in air quality on national as well as regional levels without unduly penalizing economic development. SECTION 3 That this resolution and attached Legislative Strategy be transmitted to our state and federal representatives, the North Central Texas Council of Governments, and to other agencies and individuals as appropriate. I~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of May ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City APPROVED: ,1988, A.d. Mayor I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Outline of Legislative Strategy for Clean Air Act Points to Include in the Federal Legislative Strategy National controls on motor vehicle emissions should be increased. · Controls should be extended to categories that are now exempt · A fleet average total emissions standard should be set, allowing the manufacturer to choose the most technologically feasible and cost effective ways to reduce both idle and evaporative emissions. There should be national controls on motor vehicle fuels. · There should be national controls on Reid Vapor Pressure of gasoline. · The use of alternative fuels for centralized fleet operations should be encouraged. National emission standards for commercial and private aircraft should be reviewed. The ozone control strategy should be reviewed. · There should be federally-funded independent research by an agency such as the National Aca.demy of Sciences to thoroughly understand how ozone is formed in the atmosphere. · A -federally-funded continuous hydrocarbon monitoring network at least as extensive as the ozone monitoring network should be set up by state and local agencies within one year of bill enactment. · New legislation should be reviewed within five years and appropriately modified based on the research results. There should be deadlines for attainment. · It should be recognized that deadlines for attainment and requirements for continued progress toward attainment are necessary elements of clean air legislation. · If an area cannot demonstrate attainment by 1992, and EPA specifies a required yearly average percentage reduction of hydrocarbon emissions, all federal, state and local controls should be counted towards this reduction. SIP revision calls or requirements for revision of air quality control plans should not be required more frequently than a 5-year cycle to allow time for evaluation of the progress of previous plans. Sanctions should be imposed only in areas which fail to adopt or implement an EPA. approved plan. · Sanctions should be imposed only in those jurisdictions (within a planning area) that fail to implement required control measures for which they have implementation responsibility. Approved by the Executive Board of the North Central Texas Council of Governments, as recommended by the Air Quality Mvisory Committee, January 28, 1988. I North CCentral Texas Council of Governments I I I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I P. O. Drawer COG Arlington. Texas 76005-5888 ~ r>, NN \ ~, "" ~J ,-,' "Wi /// \ /" FROM: Marti VanRavenswaay Chairman, NCTCOG Air Quality Advisory Committee TO: Mayors, City Managers and County Judges in the Dallas-Fort Worth Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area DATE: May 9, 1988 SUBJECT: Request for Endorsement of the Outline of LeQislative Strategy for Clean Air Act The U.S. Congress is developing new air quality legislation that will affect North Central Texas. While the recently-developed ozone plan has resulted in a deferral of the economic sanctions that had been proposed for the Dallas-Fort Worth area, it is very likely that new legislation will require further efforts by this region, as well as others around the country. NCTCOG's Air Quality Advisory Committee is a djverse group composed of local government elected officials, professional staff, and representatives from citizen and environmental groups and private industry. This committee developed the attached Outline of Legislative Strategy for Clean Air Act, which "identifies major points that the committee unanimously agreed should be included in new clean air legislation. This Legislative Strategy was unanimously adopted by NCTCOG's Executive Board on January 28, 1988. It has been transmitted to Congress as a consensus position from this region. NCTCOG supports further efforts toward clean air, as clearly stated in the attached Regional Policy Position on Clean Air, which was used to develop the Legislative Strategy. It is important that such efforts be undertaken in ways that will not place undue economic stress on the region, or require intrusive changes in the lifestyles of its citizens. We are asking cities and counties in the nine-county Dallas-Fort Worth CMSA to formally endorse the Legislative Strategy. As we continue to attempt to influence the direction of legislation, it is important that the region speak from a unified position; the impact of this area's air quality position will be much greater if we can show that it is strongly supported by individual local governments. The Legislative Strategy has also been transmitted to the Texas Municipal League, which is seeking to develop a unified statewide position. Timing is important, since new legislation is moving quickly through Congressional subcommittees. Therefore, we are asking that you consider adoption of the Legislative Strategy in May. A sample resolution is enclosed, which may help you develop language for your own city or county. If you have adopted the Legislative Strategy, or would like more information, please contact Jane Ojeda of NCTCOG's Environmental Resources Department, at 817/640-3300. Thank you for your consideration. CenterpointTwo 616 Six FlaQs Drive Dallas/FortWorth Metro817/640-3300 I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie, I I I I I I Ie I I I .,. Elected officials and citizens must be kept informed of efforts to attain and maintain clean air. '. Since responsibility for attaining and maintaining air quality standards is vested primarily with state and federal agencies, elected officials and citizens may not be fully aware of the significant progress made during the last two decades to reduce pOllutant emissions. For example, it is estimated that VOC's have been reduced in Dallas and Tarrant Counties by nearly 50 percent between 1973 and 1987, representing 93,000 fewer tons per year of pollutants in the air. During this same period, these two counties added almost 800,000 new residents. New controls currently being implemented as a result of the 1985 revisions to the state ozone plan are estimated to cost almost $50 million annually in the two counties. Tarrant County Dall.. County ,. 11G ,. '50 ,. ,. ,. ,. '... ,. ,. ~ 110 f no _'00 ~ _ 100 I) : el · 7I.22S ·1 10 i 70 .~ à 7a W w_ . ~~,: ~ · . ", .... ... - . · .. · '0 '0 0 0 1Ø3 'IU ,.. ,.., '173 ,.. ,.. feu ~ : 22J Minor I Ate8 I:s:sJ Stationawy ~ Mobile j. Total VOC Emissions (Tons/Year) Controls at the source are preferable to corrective actions. Mobile sources are estimated to account for more than half of the VOC emissions in the region. Direct controls to reduce the actual emissions from automobiles and ' airplanes as they are designed and manufactured are preferable to indirect measures" which alter driving pattems, such as bans on downtown parking and gasoline surcharges, or which change aircraft takeoffs and landings. The Federal Motor Vehicle Control Program of requiring catalytic converters and other poIution control equipment on new cars has been extremely successful in reducing VOC emissions nationwide since the 1970's. Local initiatives are often not as cost-effective as national controls and frequently encounter equity concerns. The most cost-effective controls should be implemented first. The Texas Air Control Board is responsible for assessing effectiveness in tons-par-year reductions of emissions, as well as estimating the anticipated costs fOf control · measures. NCTCOG has limited responsibilities for mobile sources. It stands to reason that those controls with the lowe~t cost to society per ton of emission reduction should be implemented before higher cost-per-ton alternatives. The fuR range of costs beyond dollars (such a jobs) and benefits beyond air quality (such as mass transit) should be· considered when decisions are made. High cost-per-ton figures may also occur when reductions result from corrections of illegal actions. -,.. Elected officials and citizens must be kept informed of efforts to attain and maintain clean air. Since responsibility for attaining and maintaining air quality standards is vested primarily with state and federal agencies, elected officials and citizens may not be fully aware of the significant progress made during the last two decades to reduce pollutant emissions. For example, it is estimated that VQC's have been reduced in Dallas and Tarrant Counties by nearly 50 percent between 1973 and 1987, representing 93,000 fewer tons per year of pollutants in the air. During this same period, these two counties added almost 800,000 new residents. New controls currently being implemented as a result of the 1985 revisions to the state ozone plan are estimated to cost almost $50 million annually in the two counties. Ta.....nt County ,. 1SO ,. '3O ,. f 110 i 1- ': ~ 10 W ~-, : .~;...... --"' t8.. 40 ,. 150 ,. 130 ,. - 'no ~ _ tOO ~I : ·1 a 7Q WÉ. . § so 40 . . 10 o D811as County 121.OM 11'7J 1.u ,.. ,.., ! 7UZI . .. ,. o 11'7J 'IU ... ,.., IZ2J Minor I Area ts:SI Staöorwy Total VOC Emissions (Tons/Year) , f Controls at the source are preferable to corrective actions. ';':,',' Mobile sources are estimated to account for more than half of the VOC emissions in the region. Direct controls to reduce the actual emissions from automobiles and I ' airplanes as they are designed and manufactured are preferable to indirect measures which alter driving patterns, such as bans on downtown parking and gasoline surcharges, or which change aircraft takeoffs and landings. The Federal Motor Vehicle Control Program of requiring catalytic converters and other pollution control equipment on new cars has been extremely successful in reducing VOC emissions nationwide since the 1970's. Local initiatives are often not as cost-effective as national controls and ' frequently encounter equity concerns. The most cost-effective controls should be implemented first. The Texas Air Control Board is responsible for assessing effectiveness in tons-~r-year reductions of emissions, as well as estimating the anticipated costs fOf control - measures. NCTCOG has limited responsibilities for mobile sources. It stands to reason that those controls with the Iowe~t cost to society per ton of emission reduction should be implemented before higher cost-per-ton alternatives. The fuR range of costs beyond dollars (such a jobs) and benefits beyond air quality (such as mass transit) should be considered when decisions are made. High cost-per-ton figures may also occur when reductions result from corrections of illegal actions. I-t' L ,{ . I. I I I I I I I le~ I I I I I I Ie I I Those who are part of the problem must be part of the solution. There always seem to be questions on whether a peak ozone episode in one geographic area is caused primarily from that area, or whether the ozone is transported by air currents across jUrisdictional boundaries. Since ozone or pollutant monitors cannot be established in all cities or neighborhoods, the EPA requires that computer models be used to simulate regional conditions. This leads to confusion and heated disagreements among neighboring jUrisdiètions on who should implement controls where. Using the best information available at the time a decision must be made, those who appear to contribute to the problem must expect to contribute to the solution. More independent research into the causes of peak ozone episodes is needed. There is much division of opinion on the assumed relationship of VOC emissions to peak ozone episodes in the atmosphere. This relationship is based on laboratory work that does not appear to be valid in the open air. Ozone levels in this region have not changed in proportion to reductions in VOC's during the last 15 years. This same scenario has occurred in other areas of the country, yet EPA's primary control strategy for ozone continues to be based on VOC controls alone. Ozone appears to be more affected by meteorological factors than anything else. Independent research should be funded to review available information and conduct more research tp determine how · peak ozone levels are formed and can be controlled in ambient air. If VOC levels are ~>- truly the concern, they should be measured and controlled directly as an ambient . ~-~.- standard in place of ozona . .' - ""' Improved methods are needed to measure the actual performance of controls. , , A limited number of ozone monitors are used to measure the changes in air quality over thousands of square miles. While VOC emissions can be monitored from large stationary sources, the effectiveness of controls on mobile sources and small area sources is calculated based on prescribed emissions factors. Thus, the actual performance of many control measures is subject to disagreement, even after a measure is in place. Improved . methods are needed to track the actual effectiveness of controls. Economic sanctions should not be imposed if all controls in an EPA-approved State Plan have been implemented. ,,- '\ ',:~</~:~:~\, ;' The Clean Air' Act outlines several economic sanctions which could be impoSed by the ' EPA for failure of the state to submit an acceptable ozone control plan. These include a . , ban on construction of major new industrial sources and the cutoff of federal highway and wastewater treatment funds. If the state submits and EPA approves a plan, and the controls in the plan are implemented, but ambient ozone levels do not come into compliance with the standard, economic sanctions should not be imposed. Nonattainment of a standard is not a fair basis upon which to levy sanctions until such time that methods proven to be capable of achieving attainment are identified. Twice before the state has submitted, and EPA has approved, ozone plans, for Dallas and Tarrant Counties that demonstrated attainment through computer modeling; but which did not actually attain the standard when the target date was reached. NCTCOG Executive Board 1987·88 President Joe Reglan Councilmember, City of Garland Vice President Everett B. Gladding Councilmember, City of GreenviUe Secretary~reasurer Bert C. Williams _ Mayor Pro Tern, Fort Worth Past President Gary Skaggs Director John Evans' Mayor Pro Tem, City of Dallas Director Bill Lofland County Judge, RockwaJl County Director Margie Waldrop Mayor Pro Tern, City of Lancaster Director Bob Hampton Commissioner, Tarrant County Director Marti VanRa~~enswaay Councilmernber, City' of Arlington " ' ,> J II... .' \ Regional Citizen Representative David R. Braden Dallas County Regional Citizen Representative Roy Eaton Wise County General Counsel Jerry C. Gilmore Attorney at law, Dallas Executive Director William J. Pitstick . ; ,. '!\. ........!t..' . Air Quality Advisory Committee 1~87 Chainnan'~,:~· Ernest Crosby College of Engineering UTA Vice-Chainnan Fran Bonilla Citizen, City of Irving r. I' Earl W. Tums Project Engineer, General Dynamics Joe Wells i Greater Dallas Sierra Club Harry Wells American Lung Association Gordon Green Health Director, Dallas County Jack W. Boley Dallas Chamber of Commerce Floyd Norman Dallas Environmental Health Commission Bob Galvan Director of Environmental Health, City of Richardson Pat Fowler ' Environmental Health Depl, City of Garland Richard Hay Environmental Health Manager, City of Fort Worth Marti VanRavenswaay Councilmember, City of Arlington Thomas Hatfield Director c of Environmental Health, City of Grand Prairie G.K. Maenlus Chamber of Commerce, ~ity of Fort Worth David Ellison Assistant to the City Manager, City of Denton Lloyd E. Moss" City Manager, City of Clebume James McCarley Assistant City Manager, City of Piano William Roberts Judge, CoUin County " , Ruth TanseY Commissioner, Denton County Adopted by the North Central Texas Council of Governments Executive Board August 1987 The North Central Texas Council of Governments is a voluntary association of the cities, counties and special districts in the 16-county North Central Texas region. For more information, contact North Central Texas, Council of Govemments, Department of Environmental Resources - RO. DrawerCOG/616 Six Flags Drive/Arlington, Texas 76005-5888/(817) 640-3300 (metro). I I I I I I I I Department: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Administration C 'I M · D 5/23/88 Set Da te for Pub 11 c Hea r1 ng on Proposed 14a teram:l ouncl eetlng ate: Sewer Rate Increase GN 88-41 Agenda Number: SUbject: In February of 1988 the City Council contracted with Administrative and Fiscal Consulting Service, Inc. to study our water and sewer rate structure, including analysis of increases from our suppliers (the City of Fort Worth and the Trinity River Authority). The results of this study indicate that an approximate 30% increase in utility rates is required immediately. This increase is needed to cover increased operating costs in the 1980s and to service debt now and in future years, with special attention to our bond covenants which require a debt coverage ratio of 1.3 times our maximum annual debt payment. It is also required to cover the impact of past and future rate changes by the Trinity River Authority and the City of Fort Worth. The last water and sewer rate increase experienced by the City of North Richland Hills occurred in Oecember, 1981. Since that time almost 9 million dollars in revenue bonds have been issued to upgrade and improve the water distribution system and increase water storage capacity, as well as needed improvements in the waste water system. Two large storage tanks located on Starnes Road and on Oavis Boulevard have been completed, and a 1.5 million gallon storage tank at Amundson Road and a 5 million gallon tank at College Hills are presently being engineered. Up to now, we have been able to absorb the cost of these improvements with the rate structure that was adopted in 1981. Although not legally required, a Public Hearing to obtain citizen input and comment on ~this important issue is proposed to be conducted. Recommendation: It is recommended that a Public Hearing be set for June 13th, 1988 on the proposed utility rate increase. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) .. Operating Budget . Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available K~ Department Head Signature ( City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I _Department: SUbject: I I I I I I 13-90-99-4310 $3,429 Unspecified 1987 - Street I Ie Public Works 5/23/88 - Council Meeting Date: Agreement with Southern Pacific Transportation CompanYA d N b. GN 88-42 for Watauga Road Cross lng, Resolution No. BB-15 gen a urn er. Resolution No. 88-15 authorizes the Mayor to execute the agreement which grants the City the street easement across the railroad right-of-way and provides for the railroad to construct the rubberized crossing with four flashing crossing signals on Watauga Road. The cost to the City is estimated to be $243,429 for this crossing with signals and automatic anms. The railroad is obligated to complete the crossing within one year of the execution of the agreement. Funding Source: At the awarding of the contract in July 1987, $240,000 was budgeted in 13-01-87-6150 Construction-Watauga Road Improvements. Sufficient funds are available in Unspecified for the remainder. It is proposed that funds be transferred as indicated below. From To 13-01-87-6150 $3,429 Construction - Watauga Road Improvements Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 88-15 and appropriation of the funds as indicated above. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget ., Other GO Finance Review Acct. Number See above Sufficient Funds Available ~, , Finance Director Head Signat e CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I ,I I I Ie I I RESOLUTION NO. 88-15 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: The Mayor be, and ,is hereby, authorized to execute the agreement between the City of North Richland Hills and Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, as the act and deed of the City of North Richland Hills. PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of May APPROVED: ,1988, A.D. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works SUbject: Council M~9 Date: 5/23/88 Approve Revised Drainage Plan for Cars ton Ccurt -",-Agenda Number: GN 88-43 Add 1 tl on ___._____._---.,.. The Council approved thefina' p}at for Carsþ>o'f Court Addition on June 23, 1986. The ,approval was subJect to certain drajn~~rovements being installed. These improvements were not jnstaneð,~the rest of the construction was completed. Four (4) bufTding permits haveb9&ft1ssued in the addition though total acceptance of the subdivision was never1ssUed by the Public Works Department. The developer, Public Works Department, and City Engineer have met recently to try and formulate a drainage plan far the sauth and west baunda~ ~f this addition which is safe, workable, and based on sound engineering judgement. The following drainage improvements would be required. 1. Install a properly sized reinforced concrete flume with curbs along the total addition's west boundary line and across the back of Lot 10 along the addition IS south boundary. ." 2. Install a 15" diameter underground drainage pipe with properly sized grate inlets along the addition's south boundary across Lots 10, 9, and just onto 8. 3. Discharge the 15" diameter undergound drainage pipe into the grate inlet between Lots 10 & l¡,e I~· Acquire 7.51 wide drainage easement along the addition's south boundary across Lots 10, 9 and just onto 8. I I I I I I Recommendation: The staff recommends the Council approve the revised drainage plan as outlined above in lieu of the drainage stipulations approved with PS 86-24 on June 23, 1986. I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) e Operating Budget Oth r I I Finance Review Acct. Number N/A Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Paae 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I, ¡ I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance 5/23/88 Department: Council Meeting Date: Resolution #88-16 and #88-17 Authorizing Signatures. GN 88-44 Subject: Agenda Number: . " As a result of the May 7th election, a resolution is required authorizing signatures for lx>th of the Ci ty' s deposi tory accounts at the Bank of North Texas and First RepublicBank, as follows: Torcmy Brown Dick Fisher Jeanette Rewis Mayor Mayor Pro Tern City Secretary Any two of the three officials named above Ïnust sign on all City accounts. See Resolution #88-16 and #88-17 attached. .. Reccmœndation: It is recomœnded that Resolution #88-16 and #88-17 be approved. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Acct. Number Suffici unds Available N/A Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of I~ I. I I I I I I I I· I I I ,I I I I. I I RESOLUTION NO. 88-17 Corporation Resolution Authorizing Opening and Maintenance of a Checking Account FIRST REPUBLICBANK RICHI.AND, North Richland Hills,.. Texas I HEFEBY CERl'IFY THAT at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Ci tv of North Richland Hills a corporation hereinafter referred to as. "Carpany," duly and regularly called, noticed and held, and at which there was present ,. and voting a quorum of said Board, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: RESOLVED: That FIRST REPUBLICBANK, NRH, TEXAS, be and is hereby selected as a deposi tory for the funds of this canpany, and that said funds may be deposi ted In an account styled as follows City of North Richland Hills ; that said funds shall be wi thdrawn fran said depository on the check of this carpany I,. signed' by any tVJO of the following representatives of this canpany, that checks, drafts, notes, bills of exchange and orders for the payment ç~f money may be endorsed by anyone of the signatures hereby authorized, and deposited with you for the credit of said account and that such endorsements may be made in writing or by a stamp and without designation of the person so endorsing. PLEASE PRINT PLAINLY BELaV THE NAMES OF ALL THOSE AUTHORIZED ID SIGN ON THIS ACCOUNT Names of Signers Titles Tommy Brown Mayor Dick Fisher Mayor Pro Tern Jeanette Rewis City Secretary Any of the above named are hereby authorized to stop paytœnt against checks of this canpany and to bind the canpany thereto: It is further resolved thqt any indebtedness created in connection with this account by any of the above named, whose signatures shall be required on checks or drafts or other order of payment or fund transfers shall be the debt of this canpany; It is further resolved that thE~ said Bank is hereby authorized to receive such drafts, checks, notes or orders so executed for the credit of, or in payment fran, the payee, or any other holder wi thout inquiry in any case as to the circtm'stances of their issue or the disposition of their proceeds whether drawn to the individual order of, or tendered in payment of any individual obligation of, any of the above named, That this resolution be retroactive for the period during which the canpany account has been carried with said Bank and that the action of said bank in paying such checks on such signatures during that period is hereby ratified and confirmed; that said authority hereby conferred shall remain in force' until written notice of the revocation thereof shall be received by said Bank; and that the certification of the Secretary of this company as to the election and appointment of the officers so authorized to sign such checks and endorsements and as to the signatures of such officers shall be binding upon this carpany. rn WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the corporate seal of this Carpany. this day of 19 Secretary I · I. I I I I I I I ,. I I I I I I Ie I I RESOLUTION NO. 88-16 Corporation Resolution Authorizing Opening and Maintenance of a Checking Account BANK OF NORrH TEXAS, Hurst, Texas I HEREBY CERI'IFY THAT at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Ci ty of North Rich 1 and Hills a corporation hereinafter referred to as "Canpany," duly and regularly called, noticed and held, and at which there was present,.. and voting a quorum of said Board, the following resolution was unaniIrously adopted: RESOLVED: That BANK OF NORl'H TEXAS, HURST, TEXAS, be and is hereby selected as a depository for the funds of this canpany, and that said funds may be deposited In an account styled as follows City of North Richland Hills ¡that said funds shall be withdrawn fran said deposi tory on the check of this canpany, sign~ by any two of the following representatives of this canpany, that checks, drafts, notes, bills of exchange and orders for the payment Ç)f money may be endorsed by anyone of the signatures hereby authorized, and deposited with you for the credit of said account and that such endorseIœJlts may be made in writing or by a stamp and without designation of the person so endorsing. PLEASE PRINI' PlAINLY BEI.DW THE NAMES OF ALL THOSE AUTHORIZED 'IO SIGN ON THIS ACCOUNT Names of Signers Titles Tommy Brown Mayor Dick Fisher Mayor Pro Tern Jeanette Rewis City Secretary Any of the above named are hereby authorized to stop payment against checks of this canpany and to bind the canpany thereto: It is further resolved thqt any indebtedness created in connection with this account by any of the above named, whose signatures shall be required on checks or drafts or other order of payment or fund transfers shall be the debt of this canpany¡ It is further resolved that the said Bank is hereby authoriz'2(Ì to receive such drafts, checks, notes or orders so executed for the credit of, or in payment fran, the payee, or any other holder wi thout inquiry in any case as to the circumstances of their issue or the disposition of their proceeds whether drawn to the individual order of, or tendered in payment of any individual obligation of, any of the above named, That this resolution be retroactive for the period during which the canpany account has been carried with said Bank and that the action of said bank in paying such checks on such signatures during that period is hereby ratified and confinned; that said authority hereby conferred shall remain in force' until written notice of the revocation thereof shall be received by said Bank; and that the certification of the Secretary of this canpany as to the election and appointIœnt of the officers so authorized to sign such checks and endorsements and as to the signatures of such officers shall be binding upon this canpany. IN WITNESS t-1HEREOF, I have hereunt.o set my hand and the corporate seal of this Canpany. this day of 19 Secretary I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I >1 Department: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works 5/23/88 - Counci,l' Meeting Date: Approval Purchase of Right-of-Way !rom .Marguriete Morrow, . PU 88-31 for the Pu rpose of Con~ Lrue l ; rlY 5,,1, lh r I t: 1 J RuaJ Agenda Number. __ (Parcels 6 & 7) SUbject: The Staff has negotiated with Marquriete Morrow to purchase right-of-way from her land that fronts on Smithfield Road. The negotiated price is $2,700. This equals $1.28 a square foot for property that is zoned R-2. - Recommendation: The Staff recommends approval of payment for right-of-way on Smithfield Road to Marguriete Morrow in the amount of $2,700. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Oth GO Acct. Number Suffici unds Available ~ ~~~ 13-08-87-6050 . Finance Director City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I ~ Ie I I ~ "." ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS RIGHT-OF-WAY STATE OF TEXAS I C~U~TY OF TARRANT ~:':~':That (1) (WI[) Marguriete Morrow - a widow:' , as Sellers, for and in consideration of the agreed purchase price ofTwn "ñn11~~nil ~p'TPn n11nñ'rprf Fv nn t'pnt-Q Dollars ($2.700.00 ), and upon all of the terms and conditions hereof hereby grant, sell and convey to the City of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation of Tarrant County, Texas, as Buyer, a perpetual right-of-way for the purpose of constructing, improving, widening, maintaining and using a public street with drainage facilities as may be required and the further rights to construct, improve, operate and maintain sidewalks, water, sewer or other public utilities in, under or upon said right-of-way, as described on the plat attached hereto, which plat is made a part hereof, and/or further described as follows: I KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS I I (SEE ATTACHED PLAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION) . The agreed purchase price includes full accord, satisfaction and compensation for all demands of the Seller, subject also to the following special conditions, if any: I To have and hold the same perpetually to the City of North Richland Hills and its successors and assigns forever. I ~ .. ..~~ Marg iete Morrow: SELLERS STATE OF T~S I Ie COUNTY OF "~"':'r~nt- I BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, in and for said County, Texas, on this day personally appeared Mar¡uriete Morrow known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that ~he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. . ---- ---- ,.,., ~ ", .(.; II ; : ';: I; day of May '··\4.A·~J). 19~ kNij. ~~ '~/ Notary Public ~ Tarrant " My Commission Expires 4-22~88 GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, This County, Texas . ) STATE.OF TEXAS I ) , , .' J 't '" I . ~ \ COUNTY OF I , BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, in and for sa{d County, Texas, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person and officer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that the same was the act of the said a corporation, and that he executed the same as the act of such corporation for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. I GIVEN UNDER MY HAND ~~ SEAL OF OFFICE, This day of ,A.D. ,19_ I Notary Public, My Commission Expires County, Texas I Ie I ~ I I 83·Q}'OS" E PO :J:- OF :.: .)? \ /'-3 r G ::I~ ~ :: N G l:o' 22 ;.-,. [) C. E. ~O"ROW _, VOLUME 6735. PAGE 765. ,0"rC7 TRACT A. Bl.OCK 1. 9~~A~WOO' ES7. ~ '8 I;.~; « VOLUME 388-8Q. ?AGE 9. ~~:C~ 0 g ,8"" I z ~ 22. 6 ~~I C( ._ ~:·ù6'4t; ..... I ~' ~ .......33 I rei ~ n. ¡ ~! w ~ ~i H ~ ~¡ LL i! I ;a ~I ~ : ~'L 1: ~II (J) ~ 7.: rr:" ~ ~ llj m -.J ~ -.J ~ l.lJ > :-¿ I· Ie I -. - --" I NONEMA:\ QK:VE ~ I ~ PARCEL II I ~ I I I CARROLL E. MO"~OW VOLUME 28~7. PAGE 329. O~7C¡ I Ie "':V It'1II1 SCALI 1- . 4Q · Sf(£TCH 5HUWIN~ PROPOSED RIGttT-OF-WAY KELLER-SMITHFIEL~ ~OAD rARMAHT COUNTY. r~)(A:» C SEE Fl~LO NUTES ) DES C RIP T ION I ALL that certain tract or parcel of land beinB situated 1n the Hi11i&1í.1 Cox Survey, A-321, Tarrant County. Texas and being a portion of Tract ^, Block 3, Briarwood Estates, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, as recorded in Volume 388-84, Page 9, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being mor~ particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: I BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said Tract A, said point h~ing at the inter- section of the Heat right-of-way line of Keller-Smithfield Road (a public rir.ht- of-way) and the South right-of-way line of Nonernan Drive (a public right-of-way): I THENCE South 00 degrees 16 minu tes 05 seconds t-les t along said 'Toles t ri1jh t-of -way line; 44.tO feet to the Southeast corner of said Tract A; I THENCE North 89 degrees 06 minutes 44 seconds ~.Tes t along the South boundary line of said Tract A, 11.33 feet to a point: THENCE North 00 degrees 23 minutes 52 seconds East, 42.56 feet to a point on the North boundary line of said Tract A, said point 'also being on the South right-of-way line of said Noneman Drive: I TIIENCE North 83 degrees 03 minutes 05 seconds East along said South right-of~ay line, 11.32 feet to the place of beeinning and containing 0.0112 acre of land, more or less. I THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED FROM PREVIOUS SURVEY AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE i\.'l ON TIlE GROUND SURVEY. Ie I ~ TYPE J OAVID C. MOAK SURVEYORS, INC. R£QISTEREO PUIL.C SUHV t. VOR p. o. BOX K) )4 2 fa ts - 2 ~ " HURST. TEXAS No. DATE' - 1 n . 0'-1 B~~-S5c 1- " Ie I N00JEMAN DR:\'E :¡ l:) ,.~"----l: ~ ~ I t :¿ ·I'~ ~ ~ In 0 l.J.1 !~ ¡iL m n ~:':,S7 -< I ~I ~ 6 I~ ~I: o I,' n:... 1 o ('\ r 1 ·i ~ I;.. ~ 11. I: ~ . Icn n. w C'C .r 0 N ~ I~ ~ ;n ~ 10 ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ h7.ð7~ -1~ ~ ì \ U I :J I C.E. ....OR~OW VOLUUE 6~3S. ?AGE :·S.5. ~RiCi T"ACr A. BLOCK 3. 9"!A~WOOO ES7A7ES VOL.U....E 388-8lf. ~AGE 9. JRTCr I S 89·0S I ".... E _ ~S.33 - I CARROLL E. ~OR"OW VOLU....E 28~7. ?AGE 329. ~RiC¡ I T.4.D.. T~. 6"2. I ~. 8 9 · 08 ' .:. ¡.. W :6,':''3 . . I Ie CA7HER!NE a..AX VOLUVE .587Q. ?AGE 329. ~"7Cr o n::. 'C) z . . . - U'I ~. X W ~ PÃRCEL M~ .- ::t ;.. n. ~ 1: Q. VI ~ ~ t- 1 ~ Ul ;j o no: IT... ~ :J rr: ll; Iú -J m ~ . . rc ~ > S~AL£ .1- . 40' _ .J Ll.¡ SI(£TCH 511UWINü PROPOSED RIGttT-OF-wAY K ELL E R - 5 M IT.., FIE L :J ~ 0 Å D ~ TAHHAHT COUNry. Tt.).A~ ( SEE Ft~LO NUrES ) DES C RIP T ION I ALL that certain tract or parcel of land being situated in the T/illaim Cox Survey, A-321, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of that same tract described to Carroll E. Morrow, as recorded in Volume 2817, Page 329, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly descrih~d by met~s and bounds as follows: I BEGINNING at the Northeast corner o'f said Morrow tr~ct, said point being on the West right-of-way line of Keller-Smithfield Road; (a public R~O~) . THENCE South 00 degrees ¡30 minutes 49 seconds Tvest along said West right-of-way line, 100.00 feet to the Southeast corner of said Morrow tract; I 'l1IENCE North 89 degrees 08 minutes 11 seconds T~es t along the South boundaii line of said Morrow tract, 16.13 feet to a point; I THENCE North 00 degrees 23 minutes 52 seconds East, 100.01 feet to a point on the Nort~ boundary line of said Horrow tract; THENCE South 89 degrees 06 minutes 44 seconds East along said North boundary line 16.33 feet to the plåce of beginning and containing 0.0373 acre of land, rlore or less. I I THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED FROM PREVIOUS SURVEY AND DOES NOT CO~STITlITE /u.'l ON 'l1lE GROUND SURVEY. Ie I !...- TYPE 3 OAVIO C. MOAK SURVEYORS, INc. R£GISTER£O PUIL-ae SUHV t. VOR p. O. BOX 10 34 2 6 Ö - 2 ~ II HURST. TEXAS DAT£ '2.. - 10- ., No. BC>-S 50 .. , þ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Iø>epartment: Subject: Administration Landscaping and Christmas Decorations _ Council Meeting Date: 5/23/88 .' PU 88-26 Agenda Number: I I I I I I I Attached is a City Council Action Item that was tabled at the May 9, 1988 City Council Meeting. Also, please reference the letter from John Whitney, Director of Management Services, to Councilwoman Spurlock in the Pre-Council Agenda which contains a breakdown for landscaping and decorations. Councilwoman Spurlock is recommending that the following items be funded: City Hall Facilities Trees Shrubs Seasonal Flowers Berms Bermuda Irrigation TOTAL $15,000 6,000 - 0 - _: -0- 2,000 18,000 $41,000 Pave Stone and brick patio will be bid as an add-on in the event that bid prices are lower than estimated. It is further recommended that no Christmas Decoration for the Recreation Center/Library be funded at this time as it would adversely impact the General Fund. following funding sources: . I I I ~ ~ I From: Building Maintenance (06-01-02-3020) Unspecified Utility CIP (02-09-99-6700) $20,500 20,500 To: landscaping City Facilities (13-70-86-6100) $41,000 Recommendation: ~is recommended that the City Council approve landscaping and funding as outlined aboveo Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number See Above Funds Available . Fmance Director I ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of 1 I '.).~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I.epartment: Purchasing Subject: Landscaping and Christmas Decorations I I Source of Funds: '- Bonds (GO/Rev.) " Operating Budget I Other I I I I ~ Council ~eeting Date: 5/09 /88 Agenda Number: PU 88-26 Councilwoman Hinkle, Chairman of the Decoration Committee and Councilwoman Spurlock, Chairman of the the Landscaping Committee, both advised Council of their plans for the above mentioned projects, and Project Estimated Costs are outlined below. I. Christmas Decorations (estimate) Amount Bulbs, Sockets, Anchors, Anchor W~re, Mini Lights, Timers, Electric Cords'JElectric to Buildings .$25,597 Christmas Tree (estimate) 60-70 Foot Tree Tree Transportation Tree Installation Stage Rental Tree Decorations Miscellaneous Equipment 2,500 3,208 2,200 1,500 4,000 995 14,403 $40,000 Subtotal Total To be presented by Councilwoman Hinkle. II. Landscaping, City Hall.' Fire Stq.tion 4 Animal Control/public Works Sprinkler System (all buildings) ~ 69,000 28,000 15,000 50,000 $162,000 To be presented by Councilwoman Spurlock. Total Funds Required $202,000 Funding Sources: Funds can be made available from various funding sources, as follows: Finance Review See Above . Finance Director Two ~---c£f Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 2 I .'~. I I I ,I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I ,. Transfer From: Amount 13-90-99-5000 02-09-99-6JOO 02-11-02-6200 Fire Unspecified (Building) Unspecified Utility CIP Utility Operations $ 53,000 27,500 50,000 130,500 Subtotal 01-99-01-5970 City Council Budget Reserve Contingencies 71,500 $202,000 Total Transfer To: - 13-70-86-6100 13-70-86-6150 13-70-86-6175 Landscaping City Facilities Sprinkler System City Facilities Christmas Decorations $112,000 50,00.0 40,000 $202,000 Total Proposed If Council approves the project for Christmas decorations, time and cost constraints would make is desirable to give the Director of Management Services authority to proceed on an emergency basis, waiving competitive bidding to insure staying within budget and on time deliveries. However, the Council may wish to consider reducing the total cost by $71,500 in view of the current year IS revenue shortfall, which has necessitated an administrative cutback in bUdgetary spending to 93 per cent of the authorized budget. Recommendation: It is recominended that the City Coundil determine the level of funding to be provided subject projects, and authorize emergency purchase procedures for any Christmas decorations to be acquired. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~ ., , c ...,.'~... ,...~ ~ ::~:....~i';;,<" _, "h';~"""'~ 'M;;''':' "-"'~~.ið,?vJ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I .epartment: SUbject: Public Works I I I I 02-09-56-6700 I Wa ter 02-09-56-6750 I Sewer I e 5/23/88 - Council Meeting Date: Approval of Hightower Drive Paving & Drainage Improvernents, Chdnge Order Nu. 1 Agenda Number: PW 88-14 The proposed Change Order No.1 is for miscellaneous water and sanitary sewer services and stubouts which were not shown to be constructed in the original plans. The cost for Change Order No.1 will be $3,608.22. Funding Source: Sufficient funding was originally allocated to this project. Change Order is as follows: The breakdown for this $3,358.22 $ 250.00 $3,608.22 Recommendation: j' The staff recommends approval of Change Order 'No. 1 in the amount of $3,608.22. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) e Operating Budget Other Î GO Finance Review Acct. Number See above Funds Available ¿'d- , Fmance Director City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I ~>. Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I r ~ KNOWLT CONSULTING ENGI May 10, 1988 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E. ~irector of Public Works ~ City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 6-œ¡ RS, INC. Re: 3-343, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, HIGHTOWER DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE, CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Enclosed is Change Order No. 1 to the referenced project. The Contractor is ready to begin this extra work if authorized to proceed. This change order includes construction of some miscellaneous water and sanitary sewer services for future development. The proposed total change order cost is $3,608.22. After Council review and approval of this change order, please 'have the Mayor sign the enclosed change order form and send a copy to our office for our files and for distribution to the Contractor. Meanwhile, please call if you have any questions. TEN/ljc cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Lee Maness, Dir~ctor of Finance Mr. Larry Zukman, City Inspector 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I .-" ' ~- " ' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I ( ( K-E-F NO. 3-343 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE CONTRACT WHICH WAS DATED MARCH 15 , 1988 Between CITf OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (OWNER) And AUSTIN PAVING (CONTRACTOR) For (Description of Project) HIGHTOWER DRIVE STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: .8 Construct 215 L.F. of 8" dia. (DR-35) PVC sanitary sewer in lieu of 210 L.F. 611 dia. DR-35 PVC sanitary sewer as shown on Sheet No. 4R. 6. Construct 4" dia. sanitary sewer service 20· west of the west driveway of Mr. Robert Famigletti. &. Install 1 - 24" X 6" Tee, 611 gate valve, 611 ductile iron pipe and connection to existing 211 water line at Sta. 0 + 95±. & Install 111 short single water service at Sta. 7+1O± for an air release val ve. Delete the following quantities from existing Contract Items: NO. DESCRIPTION IS. 1011 Di a. ( DR-35) PVC 3S. 611 Dia. (DR-35) PVC SUB-TOTAL UNIT PRICE 15.00 13.00 QUANT. 47 ,.. 21 0 UNIT L. F. L. F. ............................ . Add the following quantities to existing Contract Items: UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANT. 3 W. 6 II D i a. ( C 1. 50) DIP L. F . 15 . 00 80 4W. 611 Gate Valve & Box EACH 270.00 1 5W. Ductile Iron' Fittings TONS 3120.00 0.6 8W. Short Single Water Service .' EACH 270.00 1 2S. 811 Dia. (DR-35) PVC j L. F. 14.00 215 4S. 411 PVC Sanitary Sewer Service EACH 250.00 1 lOP. Asp. Pavement Replacement TONS 24.46 7 SUB-TOTAL ............................. TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST .............~. EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT .............. REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT ............... TOT AL $ 1,200.00 270.00 1,872.00 270.00 3,010.00 250.00 171.22 $ 7,043.22 $ 3,608.22 $451,620.97 $455,229.19 Contract completion time shall be increased by (10) days because of this change. CONTRACTOR/'/~_~FFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE: AUSTIN PAVING COMPANY ~.~ /'.. 8.J. Bertram BY:þ/JY'-...lJ-L /p/ ~Ex9Ç.utiYe Vice PresldentDate: 5-5 -BB ENGINEER I; RECOMMENDATION OF ~:P!ANCE: By: ~¿;¿,,¿ ¿tJ, ~ Date: ~- /lJ OWNER1S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Da te: , 1988 , 1988 , 1988 I I I I I I I I I Ie II I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works SUbject: C ., M . D 5/23/88 - ouncl ,eetlng ate: Approval of Starnes Road Street & Drainage Improvements)., d N b PW 88-15 Change Order No. 1 A~en a urn er: The proposed Change Order No. 1 is for removal of existing asphalt pavement and construction of 8" thick concrete pavement which was not included in the original contract awarded to Austin Paving for $904,568.17. The cost for Change Order No.1 will be $9,958.52. Funding Source: Sufficient funds were budgeted for this project to include this Change Order. However, these are insufficient funds in the General CIP Fund and the following transfer must be made. From To 02-90-83-6700 $9,959 Starnes Road Water 13-03-86-6150 $9,959 Construction-Starnes Road Improvements Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $9,958.52 and transfer funds as indicated above. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget ., Oth ), i GO Finance Review Acct. Number See above Funds Available . Finance Director ~ ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E. I ~Director of Public Works ~ City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 I North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-342, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, STARNES ROAD STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, I CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 AND NO.2 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I ..; .. SH-FLOWERS, INC. May 12, 1988 Enclosed is Change Order No. 1 and Change Order No. 2 to the referenced project. The Contractor is ready to begin this extra work if authorized to proceed. Change Order No. 1 includes construction of the roadway which is asphalt to be removed and replaced with 8" thick concrete. The total Change Order No. 1 is $9,958.52. .. Change Order No.2 includes construction of miscellaneous water and sewer stubouts for future development as well as additional concrete driveway construction. The total Change Order No.2 cost is $25,035.75. After Council review and approval of these change orders, please have the'~ayor sign the enclosed change order forms and send a copy to our office for our files and for distribution to the Contractor. Meanwhile, please all if you have any questions. TEN/ljc cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. Larry Jones, City Inspector 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 -. I '.' .. I 4. Ie I I I I I I I Ie ,I I I I I I Ie I I K-E-F NO. 3-342 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE CONTRACT WHICH WAS DATED MARCH 15 , 1988 Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AUSTIN PAVING (OWNER) ( CONTRACTOR) And For (Description of Project) STARNES ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: Remove Existing Asphalt Section of Roadway and Construct 811 Thick Concrete Paving from Sta. 18+06.5 to Sta. 20+50. Delete the following quantities from Exi-sting Contract itans: NO. 16. Saw Cuts UNIT PRICE 2.16 TOTAL $ (615.60) $ (615.60) DESCRIPTION UNIT L. F. QUANT. 285 SUB-TOTAL ........ Add the following quantities to existing Contract items: UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANT. TOTAL -w. Uncl. Excavation C.Y. 4.16. 95 $ 395.20 2P. Stab. Subgrade S. Y. 1.80 569 1,024.20 3P. Lime for Stable Subgrade TON 73.46 11 808.06 12P. Adj. SS MH EACH 285 1 285.00 14P. Remove Ex. C&G L. F. 3.24 183 592.92 lC. 811 Thick. Concrete Paving S. Y. 13.95 474 6,612.30 2C. 611 Curb & 2411 Gutter L. F. 4.68 183 856.44 SUB-TOTAL ........ $ 10,574.12 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST ......... $ 9,958.52 EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT ...~.... $904,568.17 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT ......... $914,526.69 Contract completion time shall be increased by ..JlQL days because of this change. CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE: AUSTIN PAVING COMPANY /~~// /J ' -'- ~.J. ~ertram By: ~~-zr~~ executive Vice Preside.. te: L,- ___IJ - ___5 - Be , 1987 ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE: By: R~ (j), ~ 5 - / 7- ,19a1 Date: OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Da te : , 1987 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I _Department: Subject: Public Works I I I The breakdown of the costs of this Change Order is as follows: II 02-09-83-6700 Water System I 02-09-83-6750 Sewer System I I The following transfer from Utility CIP will be necessary. -From I 02-09-83-6700 $1,747 Starnes Road Water C ., M· 5/23/88 - ouncl . eetlng Date: Approval of Starnes Road Street & Drainage Improvements)., PW 88-16 Change Order No. Z Ayenda Number: The proposed Change Order No.2 is for construction of water line and sanitary sewer line stubouts to satisfy right-of-way contractual agreements and provide for future access to existing utilities under the proposed concrete pavement. The cost for Change Order No.2 will be $25,035.75. Funding Source: $ 6,422.50 -,~ $16,866.85 13-03-86-6150 $ 1,746.40 Construction-Starnes Road Improvements Total $25,035.75 To 13-03-86-6150 $1,747 Construction-Starnes Road Improvements Recommendation: ~ The staff recommends approval of Change Order No.2 in the amount of $25,035.75 and transfer funds as indicated above. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget WOther"e GO Finance Review Acct. Number See above Funds Available . Finance Director City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I, Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I May 12, 1988 ~r. Greg Dickens, P.E. ~Director of Public Works ~ City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-342, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, STARNES ROAD STREET & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 AND NO. 2 Enclosed is Change Order No. 1 and Change Order No. 2 to the referenced project. The Contractor is ready to begin this extra work if authorized to proceed. Change Order No. 1 includes construction of the roadway which is asphalt to be removed and replaced with 8" thick concrete. The total Change Order No. 1 is $9,958.52. Change Order No.2 includes construction of miscellaneous water and sewer stubouts for future development as well as additional concrete driveway construction. The total Change Order No.2 cost is $25,035.75. After Council review and approval of these change orders, please have the 'Mayor sign the enclosed change order forms and send a copy to our office for our files and for distribution to the Contractor. Meanwhile, please all if you have any que~tions. ~/ T.E. NEWMAN, JR. ~ ' TEN/ljc cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. Larry Jones, City Inspector 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METROj267-3367 I· ......- I~ ./ Ie I I I I I I I lie I I I I I I Ie I I K-E-F NO. 3-342 CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO THE CONTRACT WHICH WAS DATED MARCH 28 , 1988 Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AUSTIN PAVING (OWNER) ( CONTRACTOR) And For (Description of Project) STARNES ROAD - PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: Install 8" water 1 ine stubouts as shown on the revi sed plan sheets at Sta. 27+66.28, 35+10, 41+50, 1+00, 6+05 and 5+94.92. & Install 811 sanitary sewer stuboutsas shown on the revised plan sheets at Sta. 44+41, 1+75, 4+38 and 6+53. Construct concrete driveways as directed by the Owner's Project Representative. Add the following quantities to Existing Contract items: NO. DESCRIPTION !W. 611 Dia. (DR-18) PVC Waterl ine 2W. 811 Dia. (DR-18) PVC Waterline 8W. Fire Hydrants 9W. Ductile Iron Fittings lOP. 511 Thick Concrete Driveways UNIT PRICE 17.75 20.50 890.00 1900.00 2 "96 SUB- TOT AL ........ UNIT L. F. L.F. EACH TON S.F. QUANT. 30 120 3 0.4 590 TOTAL $ 532.50 2,460.00 2,670.00 760.00 1,746.40 $8,168.90 Add the following new items to the Contract: UNIT PRICE QUANT. 1/807.30 6 -¿1J:35 223 1,485 .00 1 SUB-TOTAL ....u... TOTAL CHANGE.ORDER COST ......... EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT ......0. REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT .....~e.. NO. DESCRIPTION 14W. 1611x811 Tap Slv/all Tap Gate Vlv 1 S. 811 D i a . ( DR - 35) S . S . Pipe 25. Type II~.II S.S. Manhole. UNIT EACH L. F. EACH TOTAL 10,843.80 4 ,538 . 05 ' , 1,485.00 $ 16,866.'85 $25/035.75 $914',526. 69 $939,562~~44 Contract completion time shall be increased by (25) days because of this change. CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE: AUSTIN PAVJNG COMPANY 9.J. Bertram /:;:¿çp, ~ /¿t, ' '~:-4-~ --::- executive Vice President 5 _ ~ _ 8 ê) BY:~~ ~- Date: .J 0 ,1988 ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE: BY:P~ W,~ Date: 5 - / L- , 1988 OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Da te : , 1988 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I _Department: Subject: Public Works I I I I I I I 5/23/88 - Council Meeting Date: Approval of Miscellaneous Traffic Signalization PW 88-17 Installations, Change Order No. 1 Agenda Number: The proposed Change Order No.1 is for 17 flashing school beacon installations in addition to those 19 in the original contract. This is proposed in order to accomplish installing these flashing school beacons at all schools in the City except the beacons at the new Northridge Elementary School. School zone signs will be utilized at this location until Starnes Road construction is complete. This Change Order will allow us to combine installation of the 1987 & 1988 flashing school beacon installations as recommended by CIP and approved by the Council. With the approval of this change order, all these beacons should be in and operational prior to the beginning of the 1988-89 school year. The cost for Change Order No.1 will be $61,405. project is $249,865.80. The original contract amount for this Funding Source: $60,000 is available in account #13-00-97-6150 for this Change Order. will be transferred from Unspecified. The remainder ~ 13-00-97-6150 $60,000 Construction-School Crossing lights-1988 To 13-07-86-6150 $61,405 Construction-Signalization 5 Intersections 13-90-99-4300 $ 1,405, Unspecified 1986 GO Streets ~ ~ Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of Change Order No.1 in the amount of $61,405 and transfer of funds as indicated above. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operatin Budget , - Other¡ GO Finance Review Acct. Number See above nds Available 4. ¿~ . Fmance Director .~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I . / KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas Hay 16, 1988 Mr. Bob Yhite Sharrock Electric, Inc. 714 Vest Davis Dallas, Texas 75208 Re: 3-235, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, SCHOOL ZONE FLASHING BEACON INSTALLATIONS AT: FOSTER VILLAGE ELEMENTARY; NORTH RIDGE ELEMENTARY(NOT IN THIS CONTRACT); FORT YORTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL; CHRISTIAN TEMPLE; SNOV HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL; AND CARRIE FRANCIS THOMAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL; CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Enclosed for your action is Change Order No.1 to the above referenced Contract. This Change Order was instituted to include seventeen (17) flashing beacon signal installations around the above referenced public and private school. If you will please sign and date the enclosed copies and return them to us by Tuesday afternoon (Hay 17, 1988), we will process it and deliver it to the City to be placed on the Monday agenda for City Council approval (May 23, 1988 ) . Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this Change Order in more detail, please do not hesitate to call. v v. SHAVHAN, C.E.T. OR DESIGNER/PLANNER JVS/lld Enclosures cc: Mr. Greg Dickens, Director of Public Yorks/Utilities (w/encl.) 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I ,Þ II' K-E-F NO. 3-325 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE CONTRACT WHICH WAS DATED FEBRUARY 19 , 1988 Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SHARROCK ELECTRIC, INC. MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION INSTALLATIONS (OWNER) ( CONTRACTOR) AND FOR Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: 1. Provide seventeen (17) additional flashing beacon signals for school zone control at specified points around each of five (5) additional school locations listed below and as indicated in the attached Drawings. A. Foster Village Elementary B. North Ridge Elementary (not in this Contract) C. Snow Heights Elementary School D. Carrie Francis Christian School E. Fort Worth Christian School F. Christian Temple Addition of these seventeen (17) flashing beacon signal installations shall consist of furnishing all materials, tools, equipment and labor required to construct and install each in locations as indicated in the attached Drawings or as requested by the Owner's Resident Project Representative. The-work in- cludes installation of power service assemblies, underground conduits, drilled shaft foundations, power and signal cables, pedestals signal heads and radio- controlled school flasher cabinet assemblies (pole mounted); all as set forth in the Specifications, attached Drawings and as directed by the Owner or the Owner1s Resident Project Representative to result in a complete and finished project; for which the Contractor sh'all be compensated in accordance with the additional bid item quantities at Contract unit prices fallowing. All additional installations shall be completed b.x August 1, 1988. CHANGE ORDER BID QUANTITY UNIT BID ITEM UNIT DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION UNIT (ADDITION) PRICE COST 1:- L.S. Barricades, Signs & Traffic Handling 1 $405.00 $ 405.00 8. EACH Power Service Assembly for School Zone System Control, Compl. in Place 17 400.00 6,800.00 10. EACH Radio-Controlled School Flasher Cabinet Assembly, Campl. in Place 17 950.00 16,150.00 17. L.F. 1~-Inch Conduit (Rigid Metal), Complete in Place 368 3.25 1,196.00 I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I ., ,. Page 2, Change Order No.1, K-E-F No. 3-235 BID ITEM UNIT 18. L. F. 19. L.F. 20. L.F. 26. EACH 31. L. F. 46. EACH 63. EACH CHANGE ORDER QUANTITY UNIT BID DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION UNIT (ADDITION) PRICE COST 2-Inch PVC Conduit, In Trench, Complete in Place 2,310 2.75 6,352.50 2-Inch PVC Conduit, Pushed or Bored, Complete in Place 503 10.00 5,030.00 2-Inch Conduit (Rigid Metal), Complete in Place 160 4.25 680.00 Drilled Shaft Foundation for School Zone Beacon, Incl. Reinf., Complete in Place 17 350.00 5,950.00 3 Conductor (#8 AWG) Power Cable, Complete in Place 3,238 1.75 5,666.50 School Zone Beacon Pedestal Pole, Incl. Break-Away Type Base with Handhole & Accessories, Complete in Place 17 475.00 8,075.00 2-Section, 8-Inch School Zone Flashing Beacon Incl. Post Top Slipfitter & Mount Attachment, Complete in Place 17 300.00 5,100.00 TOTAL INCREASE ...................... $ 61,405.00 The amount of payment to the Contractor shall be adjusted by the addition of the amount of SIXTY-ONE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FIVE Dollars & NO Cents ($61,405.00). PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMOUNT ............................................. $249,865.80 REVISED CONTRAÇT AMOUNT .............................................. j311,270.80 Contract completion time shall be increased by ~t? days because of this change. By: OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: By: Date: ~ /7 Date: 5 - /7 , 1988 , 1988 Da te : , 1988