Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1988-09-12 Agendas I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 - 6:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast loop 820. NUMBER ACTION TAKEN ITEM 1. GN 88-72 2. GN 88-73 3. GN 88-76 4. PU 88-50 Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of "City of North Richland Hills Tax and Golf Course Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1988" - Ordinance No. 1565 (Agenda Item No. 17) (10 Minutes) Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of a "Paying Agent/Registrar Agreementll - Resolution No. 88-32 (Agenda Item No. 18) (5 Minutes) Approval of Contract with Richard Phelps as Golf Course Architect (Agenda Item No. 21) (10 Minutes) Approval of Contract for Acquisition of land from Richmond Bay Development _ Resolution No. 88-33 (Agenda Item No. 25) (10 Minutes) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 5. PW 88-32 Approve Proposed Installation of Sidewalk on Starnes Road (Agenda Item No. 28) (10 Minutes) 6. GN 88-71 Revised Auditorium Policy (Agenda Item No. 16) (15 Minutes) 7. GN 88-75 Operation Support for CIP Project and Impact Accounting System (Agenda Item No. 20) (5 Minutes) 8. Possible Work Session (5 Minutes) 9. Other Items (5 Minutes) 10. *Executive Session (5 Minutes) Review of Progress on Land Acquisition 11. Adjourn - 7:20 p.m. *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. NUMBER ITEM 'ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting August 22, 1988 5. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 6. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 & 30) 7. PZ 88-7 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Julio and Eumelia E. Neira to rezone the North 150 feet of Block 3, Autrey Addition from R-3 to C-2 (Located at 6650 Glenview Drive - south side of Glenview Drive at the corner of Glenview and Rita Beth Street) (Postponed from August 8th, 1988) 8. Ordinance No. 1557 I" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. PZ 88-11 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of E-systems Pool Trust to rezone Tracts 4B, 4Al, 4A4, 4A5A, 4A5B and 4A5C, J. H. Barlough Survey, Abstract 130 from R-3 to C-l (Located on the east side of Lewis Lane at Davis Boulevard) 10. Ordinance No. 1562 11. PZ 88-12 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of E-Systems Pool Trust to rezone a portion of Tract 8, J.H. Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, from R-3 to R-8 (Locàted east of Davis Boulevard and south of the Sunny Meadows Addition) 12. Ordinance No. 1563 13. PZ 88-13 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of E-Systems Pool Trust to rezone Tract 11, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, and Tract 2A, L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1652, from R-3 to I-I (Located on Cardinal Lane and east of Sunny Meadows Addition) 14. Ordinance No. 1564 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM A.CTION TAKEN 15. GN 88-70 Public Hearing - Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 1988/89 *16. GN 88-71 Revised Auditorium Policy 17. GN 88-72 Ordinance Authorizing the Issua_nce of "City of North Richland Hills Tax and Golf Course Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1988" - Ordinance No. 1565 *18. GN 88-73 Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of a "Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement" - Resolution No. 88-32 *19. GN 88-74 Contract for Laboratory Services with the Trinity River Authority *20. GN 88-75 Operation Support for CIP Project and Impact Accounting System *21. GN 88-76 Approval of Contract with Richard Phelps as Golf Course Architect *22. GN 88-77 Endorsement of the Texas Good Roads Amendment, Resolution No. 88-31 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *23. GN 88-78 Approve Resolution Supporting the Need for a Roadway Across Northeast Tarrant County, Resolution No. 88-34 *24. PU 88-49 Approve Purchase of land from George P. Macatee III, et al for the Purpose of Constructing Calloway Branch Channel Improvements, Phase II *25. PU 88-50 Approval of Contract for Acquisition of Land from Richmond Bay Development - Resolution No. 88-33 *26. PW 88-30 Approval of Grapevine Highway Water System Improvements Change Order No. 2 *27. PW 88-31 Approval of Hightower Drive Paving & Drainage Improvements _ Change Order No. 2 *28. PW 88-32 Approve Proposed Installation of Sidewalk on Starnes Road *29. PW 88-33 Approval of Emerald Hills Way Water Line Reconstruction as Change Order No. 1 to Martin Drive Paving and Drainage Improvement · I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 5 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *30. PAY 88-4 Approve Final Payment to T.W. Gilmore Construction and Calvin Baker Construction, Joint Venture, in the Amount of $25,344.75 and Authorize Transfer of Funds 31. Citizens Presentations Ms. Karon Contizano Re: Traffic Citation 32. Adjournment I .. I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I " " MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - AUGUST 22, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order August 22, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. Present: Tommy Brown Richard Davis Lyle Welch Mack Garvin Frank Metts, Jr. Virginia Moody Byron Sibbet Linda Spurlock Staff: Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Absent: Rodger N. Line Richard Albin 2. ROLL CALL . ~ t" Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Senior Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Manager City Engineer 3. INVOCATION Councilman Metts gave the invocation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 8, 1988 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the Minutes of the August 8, 1988 Meeting. Motion carried 4-0; Councilwoman Spurlock abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 5. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING AUGUST 15, 1988 APPROVED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the Minutes of the August 15~ 1988 Meeting. I- I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I . . August 22, 1988 Page 2 Motion carried 7-0. 6. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Davis removed Items No. 12 and 13 from the Consent Agenda. 7. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 & 23) APPROVED Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilman Garvín, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. * 8. PZ 88-10 REQUEST OF RICHLAND HILLS CHURCH OF CHRIST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL OF A RETIREMENT CENTER ON A PORTION OF BLOCK 7, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION, RESOLUTION NO. 88-29 (LOCATED ON MEADOW LAKES DRIVE ACROSS FROM THE MAIN CHURCH BUILDING) APPROVED * 9. PS 88-10 REQUEST OF RICHMOND BAY DEVELOPMENT FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1R AND 3R, BLOCK 10, AND "LOTS 17 THRU 19, BLOCK 10, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION (lOCATED SOUTH OF MEADOW lAKES DRIVE AT SKYLARK CIRCLE) APPROVED *10. PS 88-11 REQUEST OF MORTON JEFFREY FOR REPLAT OF LOT 6R, BLOCK 24 COLLEGE HILLS ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MOODY COURT WEST OF HOLIDAY lANE) APPROVED *11. GN 88-65 AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 722, REGULATING SCHOOL ZONE HOURS - ORDINANCE NO. 1559 APPROVED 12. GN 88-66 ADOPTION OF NEW BUILDING CODE _ ORDINANCE NO. 1560 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No. 1560 with the stipulation that the fee be changp.d from $75.00 to $50.00 and the effective date be November 1, 1988. I " .' I. I I I I I I 1 Ie I 'I I I I I I Ie I August 22, 1988 Page 3 Motjon carried 7-0. 13. GN 88-67 ADOPTION OF NEW FIRE CODE ORDINANCE _ ORDINANCE NO. 1561 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve Ordinance No. 1561 with the stipulation that the fee be changed from $75.00 to $50.00 and the effective date be November 1, 1988. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Pro Tem Davis requested that the Staff set up a meeting with the builders and developers to explain the changes in Ordinance Nos. 1560 and 1561 and to receive input from the builders and developers. 14. GN 88-68 APPOINTMENT TO CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION APPROVED Councilman Welch moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to appoint Garry Cope to Place 1 on the Civil Service Commission. Motion carried 7-0. *15. PU 88-45 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM ED PONDER AND WIFE, REBA, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING STARNES ROAD (PARCEL #4) APPROVED *16. PU 88-46 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM ROCKY Q. TURNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING SMITHFIELD ROAD (PARCEL #23) APPROVED *17. PU 88-47 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM JOHN HUM ET Al FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING SMITHFIELD ROAD (PARCEL #1) APPROVED *18. PU 88-48 APPROVE PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM QUAIL PROPERTIES, INC. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING SMITHFIELD ROAD AND STARNES ROAD (COMBINED PARCEL #17R) APPROVED *19. PW 88-26 WATAUGA ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS; REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH LONE STAR GAS COMPANY APPROVED 1-' I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I August 22, 1988 Page 4 *20. PW 88-27 AWARD OF BID ON MARTIN DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *21. PW 88-28 APPROVAL OF STARNES ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - CHANGE ORDER NO. 3R APPROVED 22. PW 88-29 AWARD OF GOLF COURSE CONTRACT TO RECREATION DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT, LTD. APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to direct the Staff to proceed with final negotiations with RDM. Motion carried 7-0. Mr. Nelson Stoppiello, 7400 Jade Circle appeared before the Council. Mr. Stoppiello stated he would like to commend the staff on taking the final step towards the golf course. Mr. Stoppiello stated he felt more time was needed for citizen input. Mr. Stoppiello asked what the rewards would be for the City if the golf course was built and if it was a recreational venture. Mr. Stoppiello stated if it was a recreational venture, what board was involved in the planning. Mr. Stoppiello stated that if a tax increase was needed to finance the golf course the citizens needed to be aware of it. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that he felt the golf course would bring economic development to the City and also an increase in home building in the Meadow lakes area. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated it would also bring recreation facilities to the citizens. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the Park and Recreation Department would have input. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the City anticipated it would bring revenue to the City. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that if no one used the golf course and the City had to take it over, it would increase taxes by approximately three cents. *23. PAY 88-3 APPROVE FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 11 IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,357.66 TO OLMOS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. _ BIG FOSSIL CREEK EROSION CONTROL PROJECT APPROVED 24. CITIZENS PRESENTATIONS 25. ADJOURNMENT I ..... I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I August 22, 1988 Page 5 Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary ~.....~'p" I I Department: _Ubject: I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Economic Development 9/12/88 - Council Meeting Date: PUBLIC HEARING on Request of Julio and Eumelia E. Neir~~~nd N PZ 88-7 to Rezone the North l~U It'eet 01 lSlock 3, J. L. AU1:rey A~10~ umber: from R-3 to C-2. Ordinance No. 1557 The Rezoning Request is presented on property located at 6650 Glenview Drive. The property is on the south side of Glenview Drive at the corner of Glenview and Rita Beth Street. The applicants stated that they wish to open a restaurant at this location. At the public hearing before the Commission several citizens, who reside on Rita Beth street, appeared in opposition to the proposed rezoning. A public hearing was scheduled for the August 8, 1988 City Council meeting, however, the applicant requested that the public hearing on PZ 88-7 be postponed until September 12, 1988. I I I I tit RECOMMENDATION: I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 88-7 requesting rezoning from R-3 Single Family to C-2 Commercial be approved with the stipulation that there be no entrance allowed to Rita Beth and a six foot screening fence be constructed along the western side of property. The City Council should hold the required Public Hearing and act upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I I I ~ III /~ Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I 1438 Ie I I· I I I I I ZONI G MAP ft' MAP CURRENT THROUGH ORDINANCE NO.loe5 OR LAST ORDINANCE LISTED IN REVISION BLOCK. I' I. I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I -. I I ( ( August 8, 1988 Page 3 Councilman Sibbet asked Mr. Scoma what his suggestion would be. Mr. Scoma stated that he felt it should be commercial to approve There being no one else wishing Hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved Ordinance No. 1556. Mayor Pro Tem is stated he felt the multi-family would be a good buffer zone. Ma ro Tem Davis stated there were very strict guidelines for the de opment of multi-family and he also felt multi-family was the hi st and best use for the land. Motion carried 4-0. - . 10. PZ 88-7 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF JULIO AND EUMELIA E. NEIRA TO REZONE THE NORTH 150 FEET OF BLOCK 3, J.L. AUTREY ADDITION, FROM R-3 TO C-2 (LOCATED AT 6650 GLENVIEW - SOUTH OF GlENVIEW AT THE CORNER OF GlENVIEW AND RITA BETH STREET) The applicant requested that this item be postponed. ..;~ 11. ORDINANÇE NO. 1557 POSTPONED 12. PZ 88-8 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF MARVIN D. SMITH TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 2, JOHN CONDRA SURVEY, ABSTRACT 311, FROM AG TO R-2 (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LINCOLN DRIVE APPRO ELV 112 FEET EAST OF CIMARRON DR Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing a lled for anyone Wishing to speak in favor of this request to Q e come forward. , appeared before the Council. Mr. Smith stated with the are houses. he was requesting R-2 zoning which was compatible r. Smith stated he planned to build 2,000 square foot .' -~ ~ . ~-".' ..,~ ...>·~-~C~::.:~:, -~>4 ~ . I Ie I I I I I I I Ie il I ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS JULY 14, 1988 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order Vice Chairman, John Schwinger, P. M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Vice Chairman Secretary Members t. Member Dir. Economic Dev. P & Z Coordinator John Schwinger Carole Flippo Don Bowen Mark Wood David Barfield Manny Tricoli C. A. Sanford Wanda Calvert ABSENT: Ron Lueck Mr. Wood made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Barfield and the motion carried 5-0 with Ms. Flippo abstaining since she was not present at the meeting. 1. PZ 88-7 Request of Julio & Eumelia E. Neira tQ rezone the north 150 feet of Block 3~ J.L. Autrey Addition, from its present classification of R-3 Single Family to C-2 Commercial. This property is located at 6650 Glenview Drive. I I I I Ie I I Vice Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Julio Neira came forward. He stated his Brother-in Law wanted to open a restaurant at this location. Mr. Wood asked if they were aware of the building codes. Mr. Neira said they were. I' Page 2 ( P & Z Minutes Ie July 15, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I ( Vice Chairman Schwinger called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Thurburn Key, 4024 Rita Beth, came forward. He said the neighbors do not want any business there. He said Rita Beth is a little street, only one block long. He said the parking would block them and the traffic would be dangerous for the 8 to 10 school kids in the area. Vice Chairman Schwinger asked Mr. Key where he lived. Mr. Key said he lives on the same side of Rita Beth. Mr. Bowen stated there are parking requirements that would have to be met. Mr. Key said several of the neighbors would have come tonight, but were ill. Mr. Barfield asked Mr. Key if it woul~ be agreeable with him if the Commission stipulated that their access would be to Glenview and there would be no entrances on Rita Beth. . Mr. Key said it would not bother him that way. Mr. Tricoli said you can not stop them parking on the street even if you put up tlNo Parking" signs. Mr. Wood said he was not sure the Commission could grant a stipulation that the only access would be on Glenview. He said this is so close to Rufe Snow Drive that it might back traffic up to the intersection. I Page 3 ( P & Z Minutes Ie July 14, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Phillip Bramer, 4019 Rita Beth, came forward. He said he did not get a letter and he has lived there 30 years. Mr. Bramer said he has the same objections to' this as Mr. Key. He said there are no sidewalks and this would create more traffic. Julia Brewer, 4033 Rita Beth, came forward. She said her mother lives at this address. She said most of the people who live in this area are old people. Ms. Brewer said if two cars park on the street no one could get through. She said if the entire area could go commercial, it would be fine because they could sell, but not just one lot. G. D. Brewer, 4033 Rita Beth, came forward. He said this man's intentions are great, but what will happen later on; what would be there the next 5 years. He said odds are not good for survival in the restaurant business. Mr. Brewer said it might work out if there was no traffic on Rita Beth. Vice Chairman Schwinger closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Barfield asked Mr. Neira if he could live with an entrance only on Glenview with a screening wall. Mr. Neira said he could. He said he does not need an entrance on Rita Beth. Mr. Neira said all they need is a drive around and out. He said these people live behind this property. Mr. Tricoli said he feels you can not stop parking on the side of the street and he is not in favor of this request. I Page 4 P & Z Minutes July 14, 1988 ( ( Ie I I I Mr. Barfield said if you have a screening fence there would be no need for them to park there. He said this is adjacent to commercial and there is commercial across the street and he feels with commercial all around, this Is the best use for the property. Mr. Barfield said the neighbors say they would not be against it if there is no entrance on Rita Beth and there is a screening fence. I I Mr. Tricoli made a motion to deny PZ 88-7. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. This motion failed by a vote of 2-4 with Mr. Barfield, Mr. Wood, Ms. Flippo and Vice Chairman Schwinger voting against the denial. I I Ie PZ 88-7 APPROVED Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PZ 88-7 with the stipulation that there be no entrance to Rita Beth and a 6 foot screening wall along the western side of the property as long as there is residential there. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-2 with Mr. Tricoli and Mr. Bowen voting against~ I I Mr. Bowen asked if the fence would block the view of traffic. I I I Mr. Sanford said it would have to be set back far enough for the sight triangle. 2. PZ 88-8 Request of Marvin D. Smith to rezo portion of Tract 2, John Con Survey, Abstract 311, ~ts present classification 0 Agriculture to R-2 Single 1ly. This property is loc on the north side of Lincoln 1ve, approximately 112 feet east of Cimarron Drive. I I Ie I Vice Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWl TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort -Worth-Dallas May 24, 1988 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 88-07 REVIEY LETTER, ZONING FROM R-3 TO C-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 147 Ve have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. To accelerate the zoning review process, we would recommend that a vicinity map be shown on all future zoning request submittals. Sus~ Sc..~\JJ~~ SUSAN SCHYINGER, G.C.E. SLS/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic Development Director Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. Richard Royston, Director' of Development Zoning Review PZ 88-07 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I·· · ~ f2 ðK-/' TO ';' 1'i [ ~ t rj-Wus tt· 1/, 'j, r- J.' ,l:, 1/ I,! C()n'ln()J/:.. ',il t h L,j/J,f Tit 1 u ¡ 11. .. 1m, ',' ,',)" GF II Ki: Jt) 960 This i:j to certiflJ that We have, this date. made a careful and accur.ite survelJ on the ground u t t ht! proper t IJ 1 oc a t ed a t ( ) , ,; (! {; I , , II\' f ('~.' [) r ; \. (' in the c: ('1 ,) ".., ) I (II 1::, 'h ] ,/l11! ! f :. 1 I:, , ','./I'1',llI( COUNTY. TEXAS described as follows: Nnrt.'¡ ,':;:1 '(,,, h """I:i, ~".f,. Autn'li Ad.. I, N ADDITI-ON-TO THE t ';¡ ': ,,' ,V, l~tJl f< ,-111 ,1I!f/ II i1 I.;, 'l','UT./llt COUNTY. TEXAS. dccording to the 'LH ur S.J11It! recorded if) Vol. ':"8-, . Page ,,' ì/ ['!.It Records of '!' i'T.lnt COUNTY, 1tE'4\AS I I ~ I GLE.~VIE.VJ D",vE.,. ( SO.C-' ..1 ~ P~.) ( ~ (.) (. J ~ l-' (t.,..).) ~.,~.~ ~ '/2 ~ ....ï 5:..L l- (:(t(> --.---.--- - / 81.~ O. I ~l. . -...-- --.. i 11'1'1 I . I ... --..~ . I'" I , _._-~.~.~---~ ~ .J . I ~ ~ uJ ct .,,-.... t- 1 0- v1 \11 "1 J1 IJ 1 v aJ ,...1 t- q w 3: 0 li1 ... ~ ~ ~ v '" - '--- C:i v 1 .: 0 "" I :() r(\ ~D. B · 24 ~ '2. (.. . 4 ¡ r~\r i ¡ I I ~\ 0 I~ 0 I ~ ú' J~ 'Z. <- ,9 ,¡, I I ! I (.) ~ £ S'"T(I(2'( Ç-2AÞW1e k~E.~. ~ (; ~ Xl I.. c- ...:.- ( . c ~ I I ~o . ~ · q -, I . '" N :J 7 .J 1 4 ] ,\J I '. /7 ~ . I i..... ~ L . c. ( BLOGk:.. 3 11 ) ,; -.-.. -. ¿. () .~ , v 1 rJ a.J (Î j <2 ...J l 1'1' ~ () ~·I(~. (' -",' C2 A" '". L. r .~ I"'¡;' C)"'¡L ." ~'-( ~'-::A"""'"" " \ V f ~ r. . ..-// ~ .j '" ì - .~---- - ~/~.. ..:., ~ t. L. ~c.~p .JJ o I j I The Plat hereon is a true, correct and accurate representation of the property as determined by survey. the l¡n~s and dimensions of said property be1ng as indicated by the Plat, the size location and type of buildings and improvements are as shown, all improvements beinq within the boundàries of the property,except as shown,set back from the prOp6l~ty linea the distances lndicdted. and that the distance zrom the nearest intersecting street or road is as shown on s~id Plat. There are no encroachments, conflicts, protrusions, or apparent easements, except . .is shown. ~~. ,'~_ ' SCALE I II : Zö' l-.J LEGEND ,,~~~'?f .!f.~.., ~.. --.. ..U' *.. . ..* · ·ÖÄ y·,O· W: "ilk'š· .................... ~. 4565 ~. JI'.... . · V"~ ..'" . , I . ". ~ _ V( ,c.süi'4'- os, ~ e. ~ ~ ~J C B~ .B-s TYPE 1 DAVID C. MOAK SURVEYORS, INC. REGISTERED PUBL.IC SURVEYOR . R O. BOX 1034 2 68 . 2 2 II HURST, TEXAS DATE 4 .. "2. q - B , No. S, - aSS · · · · FOUND STEEL ROD o . . . SET STEEL ROD <:> . . . FOUND PIPE o · . .FOUND BOIS D' ARC STAKE -~. · .POWER OR TELEPHONE LINE -.l~ · .FENCE I·· · ~' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II r .. '.J.~I F TEL D N () 'J' E S J \L L l hat c l~ r l (l i n l r a ( · t () r p ¿) r c t. \ 1 0 f ];) n d he i n g the N p r t hiS 0 r l '( . t () f B 1 P l' k '3, ..1.1.. 'Autrt>y Addition to the Cit~/ of North l{ichIantl Hills, Ttlrr¡ll1t t.:punty, TexaH as descrihpJ in Dl'ed rccordt.~d in \'nllJnH.~ '388-J, Pagt.\ ~17 t lk.·l'd Rl\('ords, Tar ran t Co un t y, T to' x. IS, and h ~ i n g nl n r (\ p ¡) r t i (' 11 L a r J y Ù (\ S C rib l' d h y ml' l v san d bounùs as follows: BEe I NN I N ( ; a t a s t ('l~ 1 r () d a t tit e Nor t 1J t? (l S l c () r n t \ r () f s aid B 1 0 C k .~ t S aid po i n t being in the South right-nf-\vay line of Clt.-nvicw Drive (~1 pUOJ.il' ri.ght-of-\.Jay); THENCE South 150 feL't tn ö steel rod; " 'liJENCE t~est Sq.a] feet to ~ stc'el rod in tbe East right-()f-\~~tY litH.' nf l~ita Beth Street (a puhl ic right-of-way), said ppint hl'in~~ tht."" hl'ginning of a non-tangent curVl") to the right \-Jhost.~ radius h('ars South 70 dl'grl\t.'s 1ì r.lÍnutl's 00 seconds East at 50.00 fE.'l}t; THI:~¡CE along said ri~~hl-nf-\ý¡¡y linl} of Rita J)c·th Slrl\('l and S:1id C'tlrVt' to thl' right an nrc distaul'l' of 1~.7 ff'l~l It' a ~;tel'l r(,J nt tilL' ~'nd of sdid l~llr\'l' tot h (' rig h l a n J ,J t l } H. ' h l' gin n i n g 0 f ¡] cur \' l ' t () l h t - Iv f t \ .' h () ~a ' r:l d i \l S b p n r s \'-'cst at Jon. on fet.'t; '11II':~:Cl: :llun~', ~;:Iid rir,ht-nf-\\'t'ly' lint- of '{:l" gl'lh ~trt't\t ¡Iud ~~~lid C'lIr\'l' to the It,(t ]].8~J fl'l.:\t l'n;l ;tel·j r(\d; 'r11":~;CI: :~()rlh ¡llong SHill E¿l:·;t ri~~ht-('·r-\\,~.y' li~'í' of l~!t.1 Hvth ~~tl·t'l·l 1,)4.8) f,,'pt to n ~.; ( l \ l.' 1 rod :l t t } \t. ' i n t p r S l' (' l i,) n () f l h l' E as t rig h t - 0 f -- \,,' a ~' I i n l' u f H i l é 1 B l.' t 11 S l r P l' t [u ~ d t It l¡ S t ) II t II rig h t - ~ ) f -\".! a y' 1 i n f' n fell' n v i La h' I ) r j \' l' : THr~(,I: East along s~lid Sputh right-of-"J¡I~ 1 ¡up of CI"l1Vil'h' I>rivv, [~J.) r"'l-t to tilt.' p I acp of hl.'g i 1111 i ng. ;/,/"f I, THE LTr\nEJ{SI(;~EI>t D() IfEI{EBY ]JECLAJ~E THAT 'I'll is PLAT 1 S A~ 1\C:ClÎ,~..\TI: l{j~PI~l:S1:NT,\Tll)N or .-\N ACTL'AL SURVEY ~1ADE O:-.J 'nlE CROUND UNI>ER ~fY SL'PER\'IStON, AS f),\TED. FUI~TlIER TilE CORNERS AND DINENSIONS OF SAID SURVEY J\llE AS INDICJ\TED. DAVID C. MOAK SURVEYORS, INC. REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR ~ 0, BOX 1034 268 - 2211 HURST, TEXAS I. - '3 () - H 7 DATE No, 87-155-N TYPE 3 .-' þ I I _ I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I ORDINANCE NO. 1557 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-7 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-3 to C-2. ALL That certain tract or parcel of land being the North 150 feet of Block 3, J.L. Autrey Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as described in Deed recorded in Volume 388-J, Page 237, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: . BEGINNING at a steel rod at the Northeast corner of said Block 3, said point being in the South right-ai-way line of Glenview Drive (a public right-of-way); THENCE South 150 feet to a steel rod; THENCE West 89.83 feet to a steel rod in the East right-of-way line of Rita Beth Street (a public right-of-way), said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right whose radius bears South 70 degrees 37 minutes 00 seconds East at 50.00 feet; THENCE along said right-of-way line of Rita Beth Street and said curve to the right an arc distance of 12.7 feet to a steel rod at the end of said curve to the right and at the beginning of a curve to the left whose radius bears West at 100.00 feet; THENCE along said right-of-way line of Rita Beth Street and said curve to the left 33.83 feet to a steel rod; THENCE North along said East right-of-way line of Rita Beth Street 104.85 feet to a steel rod at the intersection of the East right-of-way line of Rita Beth Street and the South right-of-way line of Glenview Drive; THENCE East along said South right-of-way line of Glenview Drive, 81.5 feet to the place of beginning. '...,..¡. ~ ~;, ..: ... .,r .' , "~ ' , ;::J:.j¡.¿}~~;.~..:~,... !.(, ~.. _",..~_ " ~ l >" "~, ""~~A''' .:..J Î Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 This property is located at 6650 Glenview Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14th DAY OF JULY, 1988. a~~ SECRETARY~PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-88-7 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY . ~ .- " . ~~~,;:~.:~~ . ~ !~ '". ..~..." ~._, ~ <J . -~';;..,...--.- , I I Department: I .Ubject: I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Economic Development 9/12/88 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PZ 88-11 Public Hearing on request of E-Systems Pool Trust to rezone Tracts 4B, 4Al, 4A4, 4A5A, 4A5B and 4A5C, J.H. Barlough Survey, Abstract 130 from R-3 to C-l Ordinance No. 1562 This rezoning request is presented on a portion of the vacant property located on the east side of Lewis Lane at Davis Boulevard. The requested rezoning is from R-3 Single Family to C-1 Commercial. The applicants have not indicated a proposed use for the subject property. However, they indicate that the requested C-l zoning would be the highest and best use of the subject property. Also, it would allow in the platting process the elimination of Lewis Lane, thus solving a potentially dangerous intersection at Davis Boulevard. I At the Public Hearing before the Commission, no citizens came forward to speak in direct opposition to the proposed rezoning. RECOMMENDATION: I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 88-11 4IÞrequesting rezoning from R-3 to C-l be approved. The City Council should hold the required Publrc Hearing and act upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. .~ I ~ Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available _Operating Budget - /J wOther ¡o l -i~ j~ K fI~~ ~epæ:::t~ead Signature I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 J' 1 ro-J, 'lf~~&"1 ~21 p""/ //4:1 r-' IV/ T ï"~ (T£ Tli=t:il~- · ~~\ ~~À'~ k-\. 1 Au"c !.tll',,'11J.llh !lIT '" [l;V'" ./ 0""1' I~' WI r I, 1 I I I Tll--I~I I-t 0 ~ ~ <:-2 ~ _ ( ~ / ,,.y.," s- ('\' V I I , I T~ -:¡; C;".; T I 1 II I a-7' // /1 \~t~'-2 0°'" 0" ~~ I: 'IT T 1>-1 I 1..1 -- MAIN ~ I r JY /'/ /' .114& 1 11 I Uj' -(~(.).~O - -4 Ë- ~ ! I I 1 T ..ï.A.L.L..[YVI[\Y'"'(;' . C 2 1-2 1/ // /' ' oJooJo 'r ..-..,\ ;,.'~. ,. - .. " ~ >-- _ '\)6 ,'/ I I 1 I: ,) ,".T."[LO -~I ~ :::: .; ~ >-- '" f- ¡r~ L >-- ,.-J ßr-- o~ _ _ J! ~ J- .-( ~rr.~. [J\J.. 1 - - 2 "-f----v -~ '-- . ð ~ ï =-? nO /Î""- /0... - ---< - J~'I ~:;/',==-I-~L C-2 AG ~ ~~~~~Y-1i1~' - Ary:=lill" .. R-2-J I .~~ I III TT ¡T~ \ ,/ /" I ..\",+ 1!1....;;;;ITl ~ ¡= -< ~ : II I t~""tV: ~'- R-I ",of: . ~""'r-:::1 _ -on ,~wUI '- I I L - , t" y ¡ . -:7"'""'":'-' ~ ~ -¡ 'OR I"".... ¡ .. ) ~ < -;n , "'" I I Q I-I I";' : 'fWI T : I : ~ -I I I -I e \ I" 1 -- inÎ..rn J.~ ~,) 0 SA' .~ · .~~; .' :;/ / I~~ C-I UJ " . - ~",.(... :-;" I / illll ..' { . : :.; .' '- ~ .::, I " ") R-2 - ~ !,-':.:r :-: : . ' , ~~ C.f-I R_7_tJF~pr ~. .~..~,~---:'~.,~:.;...-- \\, ~~ -'ù 1 ~4~· AG ~~;:,~·~t~ \\"'1- _-. _ ,---~"\j' ""', -rï _:'~ ~]j~r..... ··~'---~,.~i-":~::1 \ \ F.P. - ...... _'. " ¡.. I , - .~ -~ , -2 I J '6' J , l-11i7 c,,,t.f. I-I í í r.:?/1 c"f. +-~" I -I I I C- t c,t ., ~ ~.. ,t . \ \ I I 6.6 : ... ,Or ~ t'V ~ ~ \ \ , , ,~ 0 f" ! ~ O~ :~O S.~ ..f. \ ' , I 0 4 ~ 0 ./~ , I R S ~ R ~ ¡ f-~"~ ~ ..o'tt! \ ! I-~ I:/f "-, , ; ! h~2 1~" ; ~~~JH?- \ \ if ~... 5"' ~ y/,\ OL>TU .9.' Filii l.ifl 'hi T l~: \ · ~ -~D _,~ j ~ III L^I I¡ II .... Tr: ~~~ I ~~í I I II~UI III f1- I · L T)J I/\]'.I , Illl TI= I , c-' Rfl y, ::\--:::~! ·Ta< T Tl n'r! 1 =, ' ' \ - 1-=(11 , r-1~~- LJ ,~-1J T~ - I ~' ~L-< ,~FI m T Tr ~= ,Õ'II"it. .~...: ~CJ: I-I .J..J I.' ù. ,. I I -- ~I I __ ~ 11405 I ËjT /l...r~ J T -, I I 7 - :.- ~~,..,.---...._-- I I ,~~~ I~ ~ C F TNOMaS [L[M. :;.- ~ 't,,' ~, =:ycr=- -==~1---~j~f¿ ¡;~ ~~ /.' /'------". -:...~~ ~_____ ~/ ~-1_I~ LJIIIt."ALIJ"L.§wav..... ~,.. I I D '~-;- ~ - -~ ' 'r = ~-~ R-3 I .t1 ~V " ':,' R -1- M F I' ~'Y'1 ~~- r::!$""~" ~~-r-1 I',.... F.p. : .... '. ~:. , I' I ~~ ~ . 1".,cM ,.::~ - r....::::::....,..· \ \ \¿ , l I"',' ! \ laM&- ".. , \ I L~ == J I I r lIT 7 ~ ' 1 ¡ C _I : I >- .YIIID. ~ JŒ.r , I I >~ == T l.J" '- 1;;: , ~ , _I C-I \ 1.369 -~~:= ~ ~ 'fi5..~~ = , ,! SUe \\ -\.~ - ---L/f"-J- ~ "-Ir:= R-7-MF \ ~ 1290 / " -Æ -- ..0 =::::::: - - 0" ' , ~ ~= R-7-MF =-1 - - .,Q -I () ~ If -~~ == R-6-T I 1 II _ ~ QO· \ \ C-I ~ , ~ ¡: -L I! 11- - - ~ t" I \, S I I j"C;~I:1 '~ ~ =:; = II,' } ; -" ~.l. ---tB1 r ~ ~ ~~ C-I 1JJ .,:'-' ~11~.8 1· .,. / H~.~~ r ~ ~ ,.. 'I -,ö n 1.'._9~~ I Lr- ;¡~ C-I W~ ~ I II - :m¡¡ I -' / TL =C-I c- r ':'0/:" Æ ... -PD II (" ~- ' I -- 332 _/ ,#j _. ¡oå" _ .... ~R I n - . - ~ ~: '. _ /. (J " , mr "-J 1 ~ ~ ' . ~ - C -I -. :; . ~ '.~ ~ ~ -~ J ',I IT ~v[T >,~ - ~ U" . 0:.,. .. 'fIo.~' c}' If.. [.,00 ~ T ~c~l~~ (\= I· I II "'t~~ ~\ ~ ~~,~t~ --I .um~L~t~F ~ I! D_ , _ -, C 13 -~ - AG I-I 1524 ~ iii ~' '.J .. ..~ to .,' r, "t AG \... ........ ""\ I-I \~ 0rrn- " NFRQ L-" _._L_IT I: - I- t 1524 AG v (-2 1404 ~ ~.,., ~.... ,~ + u ~ÙC; CJþ.~ r,' ~~tþ. ~O~ -~- ~ ;::.--\, l ~'vþ.~þ. ;-r-~ [. ) ,~ !...--' O....~ --r~ r ~ II TT ~ I Ie I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ie I Page 4 p & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 ( ( Mr. Cowley site plan. Vice Chairman those wishing to to this request forward. ng no one wishing to speak, Chairman closed the Public Mr. Wood asked Mr. Tucker if this meets all the Planned Development requirements. Mr. Tucker said it meets all the requirements. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 88-10. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. Vice Chairman Schwinger stated the next three requests will be heard at the same time, but will be voted on separately. 5. PZ 88-11 ....'.. ,,/ Request of Trustees E-Systems, Inc. Pool Trust to rezone Tracts 4B, 4Al, 4A4, 4A5A, 4A5B, & 4A5C, J.H. Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, from their present classification of R-3 Single Family to C-l Commercial. This property is located on the east side of Lewis Lane at Davis Boulevard. 6. PZ 88-12 Request of Trustees E-Systems, Inc. Pool Trust to rezone a portion of Tract 8, J.H. Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, from its present classification of R-3 Single Family to R-8 Zero Lot Line Single Family. This property is located east of Davis Boulevard and south of the Sunny Meadows Addition. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie ~) Page 5 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 7. PZ 88-13 ( ( Request of Trustees E-Systems, Inc. Pool Trust to rezone Tract 11, T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055 and Tract lA, L. C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1652 from their present classification of R-3 Single Family to I-I Industrial. This property is located on Cardinal Lane, south of Sunnybrook Addition, and east of Sunny Meadows Addition. Vice Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. ~ David Washington came forward to represent E-Systems. He said the request of C-l is on the east side of Lewis Lane and is bounded by Commercial. Mr. Washington stated this would allow the closing of Lewis Lane which would solve the traffic problem there. Mr. Washington said the proposed R-8 is located north of the Holiday Mobile Home Park and north of the recently approved Multi-Family and then the R-l zoning. He said it is bordered on the east by Industrial. He said all this makes for an ideal transition zoning. Mr. Wood asked how many lots there would be in this R-8 area. Mr. Washington said there is 14 1/2 acres, but he does not have how many lots there would be. Mr. Washington said the Industrial request is located south of Cardinal Lane and is bounded on the east and south by Industrial. He said they are attempting to get this zoned so they can Master Plan the area. I Page 6 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Barfield said he is not in favor of Industrial being crammed up to these neighbors back doors. He said Amundson Road will come through at some point and time, but he feels you need to create an additional buffer of 150 feet with no buildings in that area or that part be low rise office zoning. Mr. Barfield said he felt they should eliminate the Industrial zoning to the north to Commercial. Mr. Washington said they would agree to Commercial zoning north of Watauga Road. Mr. Barfield said he felt there is a need for a buffer of some kind. He said he can not agree to have Industrial at their back door. Mr. Washington said the Commission has the right to make that a part of their motion. He said he could make a telephone call to the representative to see what his answer would be. Ms. Flippo asked Mr. Washington if he felt E-Systems would rather have ;~ office zoning or the buffer. Mr. Washington said he felt they would rather have the office type zoning. Vice Chairman Schwinger called for those wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. Robert Marks, 8224 Pearl Street, came forward. He asked Mr. Barfield to repeat what he had said. I I_ I I I I I I I _ I I I I I I_ I Page 7 p & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 ( ( Mr. Barfield said Amundson Road would be 48 feet wide with extra parkway of 15 to 25 feet, the city would maintain the west side and on the east side of the parkway would be office complex of 150 to 200 feet. He said it would be approximately 250 feet from their west property line. Mr. Barfield said he was thinking of residential looking office buildings. Mr. Marks said that sounds reasonable to him, but would it have to just be medical offices. Mr. Barfield said no, it could be Real Estate offices and such. Mr. Marks asked who is responsible for the plat when they sell the property. Mr. Tucker said the Commission could put stipulations on the zoning and almost make it a Planned Development. He said zoning doesn't make reference to architecture, but there are height restrictions for office zoning. Mr. Barfield said they did not want to tie down the road alignment. Mr. Tucker said if your intention is. for the road and a buffer, you can so stipulate. Mr. Marks asked how do we insure we get these stipulations. Mr. Barfield said the Planning and Zoning Commission makes them uphold them. Mr. Tucker said we are considering zoning, not platting. He said you can make the stipulations and recommend them to the council for approval. Mr. Marks asked about PZ 88-12. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 8 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 ( ( Vice Chairman Schwinger asked Mr. Marks if he was on the fence, for or against? Mr. Marks said he would have to get with the other neighbors to see. Mr. Barfield said these citizens are just as important as the developer. Mr. Bowen said since the City Council approved the Multi-Family Monday night, he thinks the R-8 is a natural transition to the R-7. Mr. Marks said no one has a problem with that except for the ingress-egress. Mr. Barfield said we could not accept a plat until Amundson is in place. Mr. Marks said they would approve of that. Mr. Marks said there has been reference made if the road goes through; it has been approved to go the northern route. He said he doesn't think the Commission should get nervous about getting a developer to develop this land because they have a very valuable piece of property. - ." Mr. Marks requested rebuttal time. Vice Chairman Schwinger said he has a letter from Kathy Robinson who was unable to appear tonight and she requested her letter be put in the minutes: "To North Richland Hills Planning and Zoning Committee on August 11, 1988 rezoning by E-System Pension Plan. From: Kathy Robinson, 6463 Chilton Drive, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie Page 9 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 I I I I Ie I ( ( I hereby request this statement be entered into the city records against any consideration of rezoning of the property held by the E-System Pension Plan represented by Mr. David Washington's firm. The Citizens of the Glenann Addition stand against any rezoning of said properties until such time we the citizens can be considered as more than just someone who lives in the area. We are citizens of this city, who have not only invested money, but have taken time to keep it from being just . another subdivision by letting the City Council know we are interested in our area and the city as a whole. Promises have been made to us by Mr. Washington, per phones, and on other occasion that he would not bring any rezoning back to City Hall before he, Mr. Washington, would discuss a deed covenant on future road, size of buildings, green belts and other matter which will be a greater financial, environment effect on our addition of Glenann and surrounding areas. I submit to you we the citizens have the,. right to help make decision that will effect us as well as the investor. I hereby submit to you to not even consider this rezoning until such time Mr. Washington can meet with the citizens to help solve some of the concerns and problems and to come to a joint decision of both Mr. Washington and the citizens to over come both our concerns and problems. In conclusion, there have been many developers and investors in the past who have made a great many promise that have not been lived up to. For peace of mind for all concerned, reject this rezoning until such time everyone comes to a joint decision that everyone can live with. Promises are only as good when they are lived up to by the investor. Promises should be in a written form that will be legally binding that will upheld. Signed Kathy Robinson." I Page 10 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( John Runnells, 8501 Cardinal Lane, came forward. He said the Commission previously denied the Commercial and Industrial zoning requests and nothing has changed. He said he would like to repeat, we have a new Junior High one and a half blocks from this zoning. Mr. Runnells said youth are going to wonder and he is concerned about this type zoning being that close to the school. He said it looks like we will have to succumb to a 4 to 6 lane road next to our property, and he requests this property remain residential. Mr. Runnells said to go and add Industrial and a 6 lane road, it takes away the country. He said the school was built for residential families, not industrial development. ~ Billy Delp, 8400 Cardinal Lane, came forward. He said these requests were handled some three months ago. He said he lives next to Amundson Road. Mr. Delp stated the ascetics of residential would be better. He said it would be putting Industrial zoning next to Sunny Meadows, Sunnybrook and. his home. Mr. Delp said it would be< encroaching into a neighborhood. He said when you get all these roads coming through, you will be having large trucks on them. Mr. Delp requested the Commission leave the greater portion residential. A lady in the audience asked how large a house is required in R-8. Mr. Sanford said 1200 square feet minimum for the zero lot line zoning. Robert Jones, 6201 Shirley, came forward. He said he is not affected as some are, but he is afraid it will devalue his property if this zoning is passed. I Page 11 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Alice Scoma, 8300 Cardinal Lane, came forward. She stated her feelings haven't changed since they last heard these requests. She asked why do we need any more Industrial and who will benefit from it, North Richland Hills or E-Systems. Ms. Scoma said we have no assurance that that part is going to be office zoning. She said she read in the paper where Mr. Barfield is against small houses. Mr. Barfield said he had recommended to the Commission to eliminate R-8, but there are places where it is needed. He said we have a lot of R-3 zoning with small houses. He said he personally does not like R-8, but it is the best place for tpis area, next to a trailer park, it is a good buffer. Ms. Scoma stated she is in opposition to going from Residential to Industrial. Mr. Barfield stated we need a buffe~- area for the Industrial. He said Watauga Road would be a good buffer to the Industrial. He said R-3 is not workable. Ms. Scoma said Amundson Road comes right next to Mr. Delp's property. Mr. Barfield said you need a buffer there. He said we may have to bend Amundson Road some. Vice Chairman Schwinger asked Mr. Sanford what the benefit would be for more Industrial. Mr. Sanford said to understand he is not speaking in favor of nor in opposition to this request, but Industrial zoning would create jobs and taxes. He said if we had large tracts of Industrial, we might I Page 12 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( encourage such people as Texas Instruments, Albertsons or J. C. Penny who hire 700 or 800 people. Mr. Lueck asked does the city receive more out of Residential or Industrial. Mr. Sanford said the importance of Industrial is it creates jobs. He said PIano enticed and got J. C. Pennys. Ms. Scoma said she doesn't care about E-Systems. She wants to live in a bedroom community; thats why she moved here. Ms. Scoma said if we give zero lot line and multi-family zoning, what affect will it have on our schools. She said they are at capacity, now. Roy Owen, 8245 Pearl, came forward. He said it will take three years for the road to go through, so we should wait three years to zone this property. He said there is nothing going on that property. He said there is already about 200 acres of ...--'" " Industrial and the tract they are requesting is another 53 acres. Mr. Owen said let them lay a plan before us if they have a developer. James Kohler, 6308 Shirley Drive, came forward. He said he is opposed to a blank check zoning which comes up to his back yard. He said to look 10 years from now; Amundson Road will probably need widening. Amundson Road will go across his back yard. He said his house is now 36 feet from Shirley Drive, 31 feet from Pearl, and 29 feet from the back lot. Mr. Kohler asked what about the increased traffic. He said industry works day and night. He said the safety problem would be greater, also. MI. Kohler said if we have a 25 foot green belt and then the road, when they have to widen the road, what then. I Page 13 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Kohler said he has a four bedroom home and if he decided to sell, he could not sell, it would be too close to the road. He said you need a wider green belt between the road and his house; 25 feet is not very much. He said this room is wider than 25 feet. Mr. Kohler said it would put his house with an intersection on both sides. He said it is the smallest city block with an intersection on either corner. Mr. Kohler said we need to leave the property residential or put a stipulation on the land. He said the citizens should be allowed to come into an agreement with the developer. Mr. Kohler said they have not been promised anything from E-Systems. He said it needs to be put down on paper. He said he is concerned with the overall picture. ~ Mr. Kohler said his house is for sale at the assessed value. Mr. Barfield asked Mr. Tucker what the possibility of swinging the road to ~he east and leave a 100 foot strip for office or a green belt. Mr. Tucker said anything is possible, but you would have to address it in the Master Thoroughfare Plan. Mr. Kohler asked what could go there. Mr. Barfield said leave it R-3. Mr. Kohler said he would agree to that. Elizabeth Durban, 6212 Shirley Drive, came forward. She said she chose to live in North Richland Hills and if she had wanted zero lot line homes, she would have bought one. She said she did not buy her home to live next to zero lot line houses. Ms. Durban said she will be here every month if necessary. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 14 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 RECESS BACK TO ORDER ( ( Bill Schott, 6309 Freida Lane, came forward. He asked what is wrong with a buffer on the east side; leave it R-3 for a buffer. Mr. Schott said a short drive away from J.C. Pennys there are $250,000 homes. He said Industrial will not work. Delores Goodson came forward. She said E-Systems has never sat down and talked to them. She said that is what they are asking for. Vice Chairman Schwinger called a 10 minute recess at 9:00 o'clock. The meeting was called back to order by the Vice Chairman with the same members present. David Washington came back for rebuttal. He said he has been listening to the citizens, and he appreciates Mr. Barfield's suggestions. Mr. Washington said there were no complaints against the C-l request. He said the complaint of the R-B, the R-B would access into R-~ by way of Amundson or Cannon Drive ;-; either way would be acceptable. Mr. Washington s"aid they could add a 200 foot wide strip of office zoning to provide a buffer. He said it would be an ideal buffer to the residential. Mr. Washington said they had proposed Amundson to move over 25 feet, but the Master Plan shows it straight. Mr. Marks came back for rebuttal. He said the general conscious is the citizens are willing to nogotiate. He said if they will designate 200 feet and will not use it. Mr. Wood said they would. Mr. Bowen said if we make a recommendation of 200 feet for office zoning, not Industrial, it would solve your fears. I Page 15 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 Ie I I I I I I I Ie PZ 88-11 APPROVED I PZ 88-12 APPROVED I I PZ 88-13 APPROVED I I I I Ie I ( ( Vice Chairman Schwinger closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Barfield said he appreciates the citizens coming. He said he visited with the land owners and can see their apprehensions and fears. He said he feels we can come to an agreement to put an office complex as a buffer. Mr. Barfield said he could not agree to Industrial backing up to their houses. He said he feels there is a workable solution. Ms. Flippo asked what if· the road is moved. Mr. Bowen said if the 200 feet is Office zoning, it could be a green belt. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 88-11. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. Mr. Tricoli made the motion to approve PZ 88-12. This motion was seconded by Mr. Barfield and the motion carried 4-3 with Mr. Bowen, Mr. Lueck, and'- Vice Chairman Schwinger voting against. Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PZ 88-13 with the stipulation that the property adjacent to the residential zoning on the west side, Mr. Delp's and Mr. Scoma's property, and Sunny Meadows and the R-3 have a 200 foot wide strip zoned Office, low rise offices and the land which lies north of Watauga Road be something like C-I zoning. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I II I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas July 27, 1988 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 88-11 REVIEY LETTER, ZONING FROM R-3 TO C-l REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 88 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. To accelerate the zoning review process, we would recommend that a . vicinity map be shown on all future zoning request submittals. ~u.s.A~ -'-.. Sc~ SUSAN L. SCHYINGER, G.C.E. SLS/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic Development Director Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning Zoning Review PZ 88-11 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1562 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-11 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-3 to C-l. TRACT A BEING 0.498 acres of land located in the J.B. Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, Tarrant County, Texas and being the same tract of land as conveyed to Gary L. Cantrell and James E. Strode by the deed recorded in Volume 7691, Page 2040 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. Said 0.498 acres being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2 inch iron rod at the northwest corner of said Tract, lying South 00 degrees 02 minutes 37 seconds East, 106.52 feet from the intersection of the east right-of-way line of Lewis Street with the east right-of-way line of Davis Boulevard. Said 1/2 inch iron rod also lying i~. the east right-of-way line of said Lewis Street; THENCE North 89 degrees 24 minutes 38 seconds East, 208.99 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod at the northeast corner of said Cantrell and Strode Tract; . THENCE South 00 degrees 15 minutes 09 seconds East, 103.92 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod at the southeast corner of said Cantrell and Strode Tract also being the northeast corner of a tract of land conveyed to R.F. Lewis by the deed recorded in Volume 1717, Page 218 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 25 minutes 52 seconds West, 209.04 feet along said north boundary line to a 1.2 inch iron rod in the east right-of-way line of aforesaid Lewis Street at the southwest corner of said Cantrell and Strode Tract; THENCE North 00 degrees 13 minutes 20 seconds West, 103.84 feet along said Lewis Street to the place of beginning and containing 0.498 acres (21,712 square feet) of land. ~. ...~...;.t- . .', ....£ I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 TRACT Al BEING a 1.53 acre tract of land located in the J.H. Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the east line of Lewis Lane, said point being 8.6 feet east of the northwest corner of a 2.5 acre tract as recorded in Volume 376, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said corner also being the northwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to R.F. Lewis as recorded in Volume 1717, Page 218, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 89 degrees 25 minutes 52 seconds East, 209.04 feet (deed call 210.4 feet) to a point for northeast corner of said tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 57 minutes East, 138.0 feet with a fence to a point, said point being the southeast corner of said Lewis tract as recorded in Volume 1717, Page 218, and in the north line of a tract of land conveyed to R.F. Lewis as recorded in Volume 3252, Page 217, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 88 degrees 58 minutes East, 165 feet to a point, said point being the northeast corner of said Lewis tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 47 minutes West, 55 feet to a point, said point being the southeast corner of said Lewis tract and also being the northeast corner of a 0.39 acre tract of land conveyed to Mattie Belle Quayle Lewis by deed recorded in Volume 6736, Page 765, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 07 minutes 45 seconds West, 46.5 feet to a point, said point being the southeast corner of said Lewis tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 34 minutes 43 seconds West, 371.74 feet to a point in the east line of Lewis Lane; THENCE North 45 feet with the east line of Lewis Lane to a point, said point being the northeast corner of said Lewis tract; THENCE North 00 degrees 30 minutes West 193 feet with the east line of Lewis Lane to the point of beginning and containing 1.53 acres of land, more or less. ....... I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 3 This property is located on the east side of Lewis Lane at Davis Boulevard. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF AUGUST, 1988. VICE , ~ OMMISSION SECR~ ZONING COMMISSION :... BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-88-11 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY .~. ............¡;..... ~ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: .Ubject: I Economic Development 9/12/88 Council Meeting Date: PZ 88-12 Agenda Number: Public Hearing on request of E-Systems Pool Trust to rezone a port:l.on of Tract: a, J.H. ßarluu~ll Survey, Abstract 130, from R-3 to R-8 Ordinance No. 1563 I I I I I I This rezoning request is on vacant property located east of Davis Boulevard and south of the Sunny Meadows Addition. The requested rezoning is from R-3 Single Family to R-8 Zero Lot Line Single Family. The applicant indicated that the reasoning behind the requested R-8 zoning is to establish a buffer between the R-7-MF to the south and the R-3 to the north. At the Public Hearing before the Commission, several citizens who reside in the area appeared in Opposition to the proposed rezoning. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 88-12 requesting rezoning from R-3 to R-8 be approved. I4IÞThe City Council should hold the required Public Hearing and act upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. I . Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget _ Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Rfl~ , City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 AG U tþ.9,l; (j~ ~ t"S ~{{. ~O - I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 4 p & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 ( ( Mr. Cowley site plan. Vice Chairman those wishing to speak to this request forward. g·no one wishing to speak, Chairman closed the Public Mr. Wood asked Mr. Tucker if this meets all the Planned Development requirements. Mr. Tucker said it meets all the requirements. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 88-10. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. Vice Chairman Schwinger stated the next three requests will be heard at the same time, but will be voted on separately. 5. PZ 88-11 ~</ Request of Trustees E-Systems, Inc. Pool Trust to rezone Tracts 4B, 4Al, 4A4, 4A5A, 4A5B, & 4A5C, J.H. Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, from their present classification of R-3 Single Family to C-l Commercial. This property is located on the east side of Lewis Lane at Davis Boulevard. 6. PZ 88-12 Request of Trustees E-Systems, Inc. Pool Trust to rezone a portion of Tract 8, J.H. Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, from its present classification of R-3 Single Family to R-8 Zero Lot Line Single Family. This property is located east of Davis Boulevard and south of the Sunny Meadows Addition. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 5 p & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 7. PZ 88-13 ( ( Request of Trustees E-Systems, Inc. Pool Trust to rezone Tract 11, T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055 and Tract lA, L. C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1652 from their present classification of R-3 Single Family to I-I Industrial. This property is located on Cardinal Lane, south of Sunny brook Addition, and east of Sunny Meadows Addition. Vice Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. David Washington came forward to represent E-Systems. He said the request of C-l is on the east side of Lewis Lane and is bounded by Commercial. Mr. Washington stated this would allow the closing of Lewis Lane which would solve the traffic problem there. Mr. Washington said the proposed R-8 is located north of the Holiday Mobile Home Park and north of the recently approved Multi-Family and then the R-l zoning. He said it is bordered on the east by Industrial. He said all this makes for an ideal transition zoning. Mr. Wood asked how many lots there would be in this R-8 area. Mr. Washington said there is 14 1/2 acres, but he does not have how many lots there would be. Mr. Washington said the Industrial request is located south of Cardinal Lane and is bounded on the east and south by Industrial. He said they are attempting to get this zoned so they can Master Plan the area. I Page 6 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11~ 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Barfield said he is not in favor of Industrial being crammed up to these neighbors back doors. He said Amundson Road will come through at some point and time, but he feels you need to create an additional buffer of 150 feet with no buildings in that area or that part be low rise office zoning. Mr. Barfield said he felt they should eliminate the Industrial zoning to the north to Commercial. Mr. Washington said they would agree to Commercial zoning north of Watauga Road. Mr. Barfield said he felt there is a need for a buffer of some kind. He said he can not agree to have Industrial at their back door. Mr. Washington said the Commission has the right to make that a part of their motion. He said he could make a telephone call to the representative to see what his answer would be. Ms. Flippo asked Mr. Washington if he felt E-Systems would rather have ~ office zoning or the buffer. Mr. Washington said he felt they would rather have the office type zoning. Vice Chairman Schwinger called for those wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. Robert Marks, 8224 Pearl Street, came forward. He asked Mr. Barfield to repeat what he had said. I Page 7 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Barfield said Amundson Road would be 48 feet wide with extra parkway of 15 to 25 feet, the city would maintain the west side and on the east side of the parkway would be office complex of 150 to 200 feet. He said it would be approximately 250 feet from their west property line. Mr. Barfield said he was thinking of residential looking office buildings. Mr. Marks said that sounds reasonable to him, but would it have to just be medical offices. Mr. Barfield said no, it could be Real Estate offices and such. Mr. Marks asked who is responsible for the plat when they sell the property. Mr. Tucker said the Commission could put stipulations on the zoning and almost make it a Planned Development. He said zoning doesn't make reference to architecture, but there are height restrictions for office zoning. Mr. Barfield said they did not want to tie down the road alignment. Mr. Tucker said if your intention is. for the road and a buffer, you can so stipulate. Mr. Marks asked how do we insure we get these stipulations. Mr. Barfield said the Planning and Zoning Commission makes them uphold them. Mr. Tucker said we are considering zoning, not platting. He said you can make the stipulations and recommend them to the council for approval. Mr. Marks asked about PZ 88-12. I Page 8 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Vice Chairman Schwinger asked Mr. Marks if he was on the fence, for or against? Mr. Marks said he would have to get with the other neighbors to see. Mr. Barfield said these citizens are just as important as the developer. Mr. Bowen said since the City Council approved the Multi-Family Monday night, he thinks the R-8 is a natural transition to the R-7. Mr. Marks said no one has a problem with that except for the ingress-egress. Mr. Barfield said we could not accept a plat until Amundson is in place. Mr. Marks said they would approve of that. Mr. Marks said there has been reference made if the road goes through; it has been approved to go the northern route. He said he doesn't think the Commission should get nervous about getting a developer to develop this land because they have a very valuable piece of property. Mr. Marks requested rebuttal time. Vice Chairman Schwinger said he has a letter from Kathy Robinson who was unable to appear tonight and she requested her letter be put in the minutes: "To North Richland Hills Planning and Zoning Committee on August 11, 1988 rezoning by E-System Pension Plan. From: Kathy Robinson, 6463 Chilton Drive, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180. I Page 9 ( P & Z Minutes 1_ August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I II I I I Ie I ( I hereby request this statement be entered into the city records against any consideration of rezoning of the property held by the E-System Pension Plan represented by Mr. David Washington's firm. The Citizens of the Glenann Addition stand against any rezoning of said properties until such time we the citizens can be considered as more than just someone who lives in the area. We are citizens of this city, who have not only invested money, but have taken time to keep it from being just another subdivision by letting the City Council know we are interested in our area and the city as a whole. Promises have been made to us by Mr. Washington, per phones, and on other occasion that he would not bring any rezoning back to City Hall before he, Mr. Washington, would discuss a deed covenant on future road, size of buildings, green belts and other matter which will be a greater financial, environment effect on our addition of Glenann and surrounding areas. I submit to you we the citizens have th~ right to help make decision that will effect us as well as the investor. I hereby submit to you to not even consider this rezoning until such time Mr. Washington can meet with the citizens to help solve some of the concerns and problems and to come to a joint decision of both Mr. Washington and the citizens to over come both our concerns and problems. In conclusion, there have been many developers and investors in the past who have made a great many promise that have not been lived up to. For peace of mind for all concerned, reject this rezoning until such time everyone comes to a joint decision that everyone can live with. Promises are only as good when they are lived up to by the investor. Promises should be in a written form that will be legally binding that will upheld. Signed Kathy Robinson." I Page 10 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( John Runnells, 8501 Cardinal Lane, came forward. He said the Commission previo~sly denied the Commercial and Industrial zoning requests and nothing has changed. He said he would like to repeat, we have a new Junior High one and a half blocks from this zoning. Mr. Runnells said youth are going to wonder and he is concerned about this type zoning being that close to the school. He said it looks like we will have to succumb to a 4 to 6 lane road next to our property, and he requests this property remain residential. Mr. Runnells said to go and add Industrial and a 6 lane road, it takes away the country. He said the school was built for residential families, not industrial development. Billy Delp, 8400 Cardinal Lane, came forward. He said these requests were handled some three months ago. He said he lives next to Amundson Road. Mr. Delp stated the ascetics of residential would be better. He said it would be putting Industrial zoning next to Sunny Meadows, Sunnybrook and. his home. Mr. Delp said it would b~~ encroaching into a neighborhood. He said when you get all these roads coming through, you will be having large trucks on them. Mr. Delp requested the Commission leave the greater portion residential. A lady in the audience asked how large a house is required in R-8. Mr. Sanford said 1200 square feet minimum for the zero lot line zoning. Robert Jones, 6201 Shirley, came forward. He said he is not affected as some are, but he is afraid it will devalue his property if this zoning is passed. I Page 11 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I Ie I I ( ( Alice Scoma, 8300 Cardinal Lane, came forward. She stated her feelings haven't changed since they last heard these requests. She asked why do we need any more Industrial and who will benefit from it, North Richland Hills or E-Systems. Ms. Scoma said we have no assurance that that part is going to be office zoning. She said she read in the paper where Mr. Barfield is against small houses. Mr. Barfield said he had recommended to the Commission to eliminate R-8, but there are places where it is needed. He said we have a lot of R-3 zoning with small houses. He said he personally does not like R-8, but it is the best place for this area, next to a trailer park, it is a good buffer. Ms. Scoma stated she is in opposition to going from Residential to Industrial. Mr. Barfield stated we need a buffer~ area for the Industrial. He said Watauga Road would be a good buffer to the Industrial. He said R-3 is not workable. Ms. Scoma said Amundson Road comes right next to Mr. Delp's property. Mr. Barfield said you need a buffer there. He said we may have to bend Amundson Road some. Vice Chairman Schwinger asked Mr. Sanford what the benefit would be for more Industrial. Mr. Sanford said to understand he is not speaking in favor of nor in opposition to this request, but Industrial zoning would create jobs and taxes. He said if we had large tracts of Industrial, we might I Page 12 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( encourage such people as Texas Instruments, Albertsons or J. C. Penny who hire 700 or 800 people. Mr. Lueck asked does the city receive more out of Residential or Industrial. Mr. Sanford said the importance of Industrial is it creates jobs. He said PIano enticed and got J. C. Pennys. Ms. Scoma said she doesn't care about E-Systems. She wants to live in a bedroom community; thats why she moved here. Ms. Scoma said if we give zero lot line and multi-family zoning, what affect will it have on our schools. She said they are at capacity, now. Roy Owen, 8245 Pearl, came forward. He said it will take three years for the road to go through, so we should wait three years to zone this property. He said there is nothing going on that property. He said there is already about 200 acres of Industrial and the tract they are ~. requesting is another 53 acres. Mr. Owen said let them lay a plan before us if they have a developer. James Kohler, 6308 Shirley Drive, came forward. He said he is opposed to a blank check zoning which comes up to his back yard. He said to look 10 years from now; Amundson Road will probably need widening. Amundson Road will go across his back yard. He said his house is now 36 feet from Shirley Drive, 31 feet from Pearl, and 29 feet from the back lot. Mr. Kohler asked what about the increased traffic. He said industry works day and night. He said the safety problem would be greater, also. Mr. Kohler said if we have a 25 foot green belt and then the road, when they have to widen the road, what then. I Page 13 { P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Kohler said he has a four bedroom home and if he decided to sell, he could not sell, it would be too close to the road. He said you need a wider green belt between the road and his house; 25 feet is not very much. He said this room is wider than 25 feet. Mr. Kohler said it would put his house with an intersection on both sides. He said it is the smallest city block with an intersection on either corner. Mr. Kohler said we need to leave the property residential or put a stipulation on the land. He said the citizens should be allowed to come into an agreement with the developer. Mr. Kohler said they have not been promised anything from E-Systems. He said it needs to be put down on paper. He said he is concerned with the overall picture. Mr. Kohler said his house is for sale at the assessed value. Mr. Barfield asked Mr. Tucker what the possibility of swinging the road to _the east and leave a 100 foot strip for office or a green belt. Mr. Tucker said anything is possible', but you would have to address it in the Master Thoroughfare Plan. Mr. Kohler asked what could go there. Mr. Barfield said leave it R-3. Mr. Kohler said he would agree to that. Elizabeth Durban, 6212 Shirley Drive, came forward. She said she chose to live in North Richland Hills and if she had wanted zero lot line homes, she would have bought one. She said she did not buy her home to live next to zero lot line houses. Ms. Durban said she will be here every month 1f necessary. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I Pa~e 14 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 RECESS BACK TO ORDER ( ( Bill Schott, 6309 Freida Lane, came forward. He asked what is wrong with a buffer on the east side; leave it R-3 for a buffer. Mr. Schott said a short drive away from J.C. Pennys there are $250,000 homes. He said Industrial will not work. Delores Goodson came forward. She said E-Systems has never sat down and talked to them. She said that is what they are asking for. Vice Chairman Schwinger called a 10 minute recess at 9:00 o'clock. The meeting was called back to order by the Vice Chairman with the same members present. David Washington came back for rebuttal. He said he has been listening to the citizens, and he appreciates Mr. Barfield's suggestions. Mr. Washington said there were no complaints against the C-I request. He said the complaint of the R-B, the R-8 would access into R-¡ by way of Amundson or Cannon Drive; -.. either way would be acceptable. Mr. Washington said they could add a 200 foot wide strip of office zoning to . provide a buffer. He said it would be an ideal buffer to the residential. Mr. Washington said they had proposed Amundson to move over 25 feet, but the Master Plan shows it straight. Mr. Marks came back for rebuttal. He said the general conscious is the citizens are willing to nogotiate. He said if they will designate 400 feet and will not use it. Mr. Wood said they would. Mr. Bowen said if we make a recommendation of 200 feet for office zoning, not Industrial, it would solve your fears. I Page 15 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 Ie I I I I I I I Ie PZ 88-11 APPROVED I PZ 88-12 APPROVED I I PZ 88-13 APPROVED I I I I Ie I ( c Vice Chairman Schwinger closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Barfield said he appreciates the citizens coming. He said he visited with the land owners and can see their apprehensions and fears. He said he feels we can come to an agreement to put an office complex as a buffer. Mr. Barfield said he could not agree to Industrial backing up to their houses. He said he feels there is a workable solution. Ms. Flippo asked what if the road is moved. Mr. Bowen said if the 200 feet is Office zoning, it could be a green belt. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 88-11. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. Mr. Tricoli made the motion to approve PZ 88-12. This motion was seconded by Mr. Barfield and the motion carried ,~ 4-3 with Mr. Bowen, Mr. Lueck, and~· Vice Chairman Schwinger voting against. Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PZ 88-13 with the stipulation that the property adjacent to the residential zoning on the west side, Mr. Delp's and Mr. Scoma's property, and Sunny Meadows and the R-3 have a 200 foot wide strip zoned Office, low rise offices and the land which lies north of Watauga Road be something like C-l zoning. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0. I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .. ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas July 27, 1988 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 88-12 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-3 TO R-8 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 97 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. To accelerate the zoning review process, we would recommend that a vicinity map be shown on all future zoning request submittals. ~~A~ J-, SCh~(\'~~ SUSAN L. SCHWINGER, G.C.E. SLS/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic Development Director Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning Zoning Review PZ 88-12 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I I_ I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1563 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-12 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-3 to R-8. ALL that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the John Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at a steel rod at the southwest corner of Lot 3 in Block D of Sunny Meadows, 2nd Filing, an addition the the City of North Richland Hills, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-83, Page 38, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 29 minutes 45 seconds East, 311.83 feet to the point of beginning; THENCE North 59 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds East, 900.27 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 48 minutes 00 seconds East, 252.27 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East, 960.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 71 degrees 22 minutes 51 seconds West, 881.76 feet to a point for corner; THENCE Along a curve to the left an arc length of 198.16 feet to a steel rod for corner, said curve having a central angle of 19 degrees 01 minutes 47 seconds, a radius of 596.62 feet, a tangent length of 100.00 feet, a chord length of 197.25 feet, and a chord bearing of North 80 degrees 53 minutes 44 seconds West; THENCE North 00 degrees 29 minutes 45 seconds West, 191.00 feet to the point of beginning and containing 14.5775 acres of land. -" ,- . I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 This property is located east of Davis Boulevard and south of the Sunny Meadows Addition. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF AUGUST, 1988. SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-88-12 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY - ."" . , I' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: -SUbject: I Economic Development . 9/12/88 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PZ 88-13 I Public Hearing on request of E-Systems Pool Trust to rezone Tract 11, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, and Tract 2A, L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1652, from R-3 to I-I Ordinance No. 1564 I This rezoning request is on vacant property located on Cardinal Lane and east of Sunny Meadows Addition. The requested rezoning is from R-3 Single Family to I-I Industrial. I The applicants have not indicated a proposed use for the subject property. However, they indicated that the requested I-I zoning would be the highest and best use of the subject property. The applicant also stated that the requested I-I zoning in conjunction with their other properties would allow them to ~eek out users requiring large acreage sites. I At the Public Hearing before the Commission a large number of citizens who reside in the area appeared in opposition to the proposed rezoning. I _ RECOMMENDATION: I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 88-13 be approved with the stipulation that property adjacent to residential use along the west side have a two hundred foot strip zoned 0-1 Office as a buffer. The City Council should hold the required Public Hearing and act upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. I II Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget _ ., Other U b;;¡~ Department ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable R ~r¡;; City anager , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 AG u ~~Ùr, (J~ 'J~ ",+tt- ¥O~ I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 4 p & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 ( ( Mr. Cowley requested approval of site plan. Vice Chairman Schwinge those wishing to s~ in opposition to this request please come forward. eing no one wishing to speak, Chairman closed the Public Mr. Wood asked Mr. Tucker if this meets all the Planned Development requirements. Mr. Tucker said it meets all the requirements. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 88-10. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. Vice Chairman Schwinger stated the next three requests will be heard at the same time, but will be voted on separately. 5. PZ 88-11 -~~ Request of Trustees E-Systems, Inc. Pool Trust to rezone Tracts 4B, 4Al, 4A4, 4A5A, 4A5B, & 4A5C, J.H. Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, from their present classification of R-3 Single Family to C-l Commercial. This property is located on the east side of Lewis Lane at Davis Boulevard. 6. PZ 88-12 Request of Trustees E-Systems, Inc. Pool Trust to rezone a portion of Tract 8, J.H. Barlough Survey, Abstract 130, from its present classification of R-3 Single Family to R-8 Zero Lot Line Single Family. This property 1s located east of Davis Boulevard and south of the Sunny Meadows Addition. I Page 5 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 Ie I 7. PZ 88-13 I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Request of Trustees E-Systems, Inc. Pool Trust to rezone Tract 11, T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055 and Tract lA, L. C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1652 from their present" classification of R-3 Single Family to I-I Industrial. This property is located on Cardinal Lane, south of Sunnybrook Addition, and east of Sunny Meadows Addition. Vice Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. David Washington came forward to represent E-Systems. He said the request of C-l is on the east side of Lewis Lane and is bounded by Commercial. Mr. Washington stated this would allow the closing of Lewis Lane which would solve the traffic problem there. Mr. Washington said the proposed R-8 is located north of the Holiday Mobile Home Park and north of the recently approved Multi-Family and then the R-3 zoning. He said it is bordered on the east by Industrial. He said all this makes for an ideal transition zoning. . Mr. Wood asked how many lots there would be in this R-8 area. Mr. Washington said there is 14 1/2 acres, but he does not have how many lots there would be. Mr. Washington said the Industrial request is located south of Cardinal Lane and is bounded on the east and south by Industrial. He said they are attempting to get this zoned so they can Master Plan the area. I Page 6 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Barfield said he is not in favor of Industrial being crammed up to these neighbors back doors. He said Amundson Road will come through at some point and time, but he feels you need to create an additional buffer of 150 feet with no buildings in that area or that part be low rise office zoning. Mr. Barfield said he felt they should eliminate the Industrial zoning to the north to Commercial. Mr. Washington said they would agree to Commercial zoning north of Watauga Road. Mr. Barfield said he felt there is a need for a buffer of some kind. He said he can not agree to have Industrial at their back door. Mr. Washington said the Commission has the right to make that a part of their motion. He said he could make a telephone call to the representative to see what his answer would be. Ms. Flippo asked Mr. Washington if he felt E-Systems would rather have office zoning or the buffer. Mr. Washington said he felt they would rather have the office type zoning. Vice Chairman Schwinger called for those wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. Robert Marks, 8224 Pearl Street, came forward. He asked Mr. Barfield to repeat what he had said. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 7 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 ( ( Mr. Barfield said Amundson Road would be 48 feet wide with extra parkway of 15 to 25 feet, the city would maintain the west side and on the east side of the parkway would be office complex of 150 to 200 feet. He said it would be approximately 250 feet from their west property line. Mr. Barfield said he was thinking of residential looking office buildings. Mr. Marks said that sounds reasonable to him, but would it have to just be medical offices. Mr. Barfield said no, it could be Real Estate offices and such. Mr. Marks asked who is responsible for the plat when they sell the property. Mr. Tucker said the Commission could put stipulations on the zoning and almost make it a Planned Development. He said zoning doesn't make reference to architecture, but there are height restrictions for office zoning. Mr. Barfield said they did not want to tie down the road alignment. Mr. Tucker said if your intention is for the road and a buffer, you can so stipulate. Mr. Marks asked how do we insure we get these stipulations. Mr. Barfield said the Planning and Zoning Commission makes them uphold them. Mr. Tucker said we are considering zoning, not platting. He said you can make the stipulations and recommend them to the council for approval. Mr. Marks asked about PZ 88-12. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 8 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 ( ( Vice Chairman Schwinger asked Mr. Marks if he was on the fence, for or against? Mr. Marks said he would have to get with the other neighbors to see. Mr. Barfield said these citizens are just as important as the developer. Mr. Bowen said since the City Council approved the Multi-Family Monday night, he thinks the R-8 is a natural transition to the R-7. Mr. Marks said no one has a problem with that except for the ingress-egress. Mr. Barfield said we could not accept a plat until Amundson is in place. Mr. Marks said they would approve of that. Mr. Marks said there has been reference made if the road goes through; it has been approved to go the northern route. He said he doesn't think the Commission should get nervous about getting a developer to develop this land because they have a very valuable piece of property. Mr. Marks requested rebuttal time. Vice Chairman Schwinger said he has a letter from Kathy Robinson who was unable to appear tonight and she requested her letter be put in the minutes: "To North Richland Hills Planning and Zoning Committee on August 11, 1988 rezoning by E-System Pension Plan. From: Kathy Robinson, 6463 Chilton Drive, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180. I Ie I ,I I I I I I Ie I ~ II I I I ~e I ~ Page 9 p & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 ( ( I hereby request this statement be entered into the city records against any consideration of rezoning of the property held by the E-System Pension Plan represented by Mr. David Washington's firm. The Citizens of the Glenann Addition stand against any rezoning of said properties until such time we the citizens can be considered as more than just someone who lives in the area. We are citizens of this city, who have not only invested money, but have taken time to keep it from being just another subdivision by letting the City Council know we are interested in our area and the city as a whole. Promises have been made to us by Mr. Washington, per phones, and on other occasion that he would not bring any rezoning back to City Hall before he, Mr. Washington, would discuss a deed covenant on future road, size of buildings, green belts and other matter which will be a greater financial, environment effect on our addition of Glenann and surrounding areas. I submit to you we the citizens have the right to help make decision that will effect us as well as the investor. I hereby submit to you to not even consider this rezoning until such time Mr. Washington can meet with the citizens to help solve some of the concerns and problems and to come to a joint decision of both Mr. Washington and the citizens to over come both our concerns and problems. In conclusion, there have been many developers and investors in the past who have made a great many promise that have not been lived up to. For peace of mind for all concerned, reject this rezoning until such time everyone comes to a joint decision that everyone can live with. Promises are only as good when they are lived up to by the investor. Promises should be in a written form that will be legally binding that will upheld. Signed Kathy Robinson." I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 10 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 ( ( John Runnells, 8501 Cardinal Lane, came forward. He said the Commission previously denied the Commercial and Industrial zoning requests and nothing has changed. He said he would like to repeat, we have a new Junior High one and a half blocks from this zoning. Mr. Runnells said youth are going to wonder and he is concerned about this type zoning being that close to the school. He said it looks like we will have to succumb to a 4 to 6 lane road next to our property, and he requests this property remain residential. Mr. Runnells said to go and add Industrial and a 6 lane road, it takes away the country. He said the school was built for residential families, not industrial development. Billy Delp, 8400 Cardinal Lane, came forward. He said these requests were handled some three months ago. He said he lives next to Amundson Road. Mr. Delp stated the ascetics of residential would be better. He said it would be putting Industrial zoning next to Sunny Meadows, Sunnybrook and his home. Mr. Delp said it would be encroaching into a neighborhood. He said when you get all these roads coming through, you will be having large trucks on them. Mr. Delp requested the Commission leave the greater portion residential. A lady in the audience asked how large a house is required in R-8. Mr. Sanford said 1200 square feet minimum for the zero lot line zoning. Robert Jones, 6201 Shirley, came forward. He said he is not affected as some are, but he is afraid it will devalue his property if this zoning is passed. I' Page 11 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Alice Scoma, 8300 Cardinal Lane, came forward. She stated her feelings haven't changed since they last heard these requests. She asked why do we need any more Indu·strial and who will benefit from it, North Richland Hills or E-Systems. Ms. Scoma said we have no assurance that that part is going to be office zoning. She said she read in the paper where Mr. Barfield is against small houses. Mr. Barfield said he had recommended to the Commission to eliminate R-8, but there are places where it is needed. He said we have a lot of R-3 zoning with small houses. He said he personally does not like R-8, but it is the best place for this area, next to a trailer park, it is a good buffer. Ms. Scoma stated she is in opposition to going from Residential to Industrial. Mr. Barfield stated we need a buffer· area for the Industrial. He said Watauga Road would be a good buffer to the Industrial. He said R-3 is not workable. Ms. Scoma said Amundson Road comes right next to Mr. Delp's property. Mr. Barfield said you need a buffer there. He said we may have to bend Amundson Road some. Vice Chairman Schwinger asked Mr. Sanford what the benefit would be for more Industrial. Mr. Sanford said to understand he is not speaking in favor of nor in opposition to this request, but Industrial zoning would create jobs and taxes. He said if we had large tracts of Industrial, we might I' Page 12 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I II I I I Ie I ( encourage such people as Texas Instruments, Albertsons or J. C. Penny who hire 700 or 800 people. Mr. Lueck asked does the city receive more out of Residential or Industrial. Mr. Sanford said the importance of Industrial is it creates jobs. He said PIano enticed and got J. C. Pennys. Ms. Scoma said she doesn't care about E-Systems. She wants to live in a bedroom community; thats why she moved here. Ms. Scoma said if we give zero lot line and multi-family zoning, what affect will it have on our schools. She said they are at capacity, now. Roy Owen, 8245 Pearl, came forward. He said it will take three years for the road to go through, so we should wait three years to zone this property. He said there is nothing going on that property. He said there is already about 200 acres of Industrial and the tract they are requesting is another 53 acres. Mr. Owen said let them lay a plan before us if they have a developer. James Kohler, 6308 Shirley Drive, came forward. He said he is opposed to a blank check zoning which comes up to his back yard. He said to look 10 years from now; Amundson Road will probably need widening. Amundson Road will go across his back yard. He said his house is now 36 feet from Shirley Drive, 31 feet from Pearl, and 29 feet from the back lot. Mr. Kohler asked what about the increased traffic. He said industry works day and night. He said the safety problem would be greater, also. Mr. Kohler said if we have a 25 foot green belt and then the road, when they have to widen the road, what then. I' Page 13 ( P & Z Minutes Ie August 11, 1988 1 1 I I I I I Ie I I I 1 I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Kohler said he has a four bedroom home and if he decided to sell, he could not sell, it would be too close to the road. He ~aid you need a wider green belt between the road and his house; 25 feet is not very much. He said this room is wider than 25 feet. Mr. Kohler said it would put his house with an intersection on both sides. He said it is the smallest city block with an intersection on either corner. Mr. Kohler said we need to leave the property residential or put a stipulation on the land. He said the citizens should be allowed to come into an agreement with the developer. Mr. Kohler said they have not been promised anything from E-Systems. He said it needs to be put down on paper. He said he is concerned with the overall picture. Mr. Kohler said his house is for sale at the assessed value. Mr. Barfield asked Mr. Tucker what the possibility of swinging the road to ~he east and leave a 100 foot strip for office or a green belt. Mr. Tucker said anything is possible', but you would have to address it in the Master Thoroughfare Plan. Mr. Kohler asked what could go there. Mr. Barfield said leave it R-3. Mr. Kohler said he would agree to that. Elizabeth Durban, 6212 Shirley Drive, came forward. She said she chose to live in North Richland Hills and if she had wanted zero lot line homes, she would have bought one. She said she did not buy her home to live next to zero lot line houses. Ms. Durban said she will be here every month if necessary. I Page 14 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 Ie I I I I I RECESS I BACK TO ORDER I Ie I I I I ,I I I Ie I ( (- Bill Schott, 6309 Freida Lane, came forward. He asked what is wrong with a buffer on the east side; leave it R-3 for a buffer. Mr. Schott said a short drive away fOrom J. C. Pennys there are $250,000 homes. He said Industrial will not work. Delores Goodson came forward. She said E-Systems has never sat down and talked to them. She said that is what they are asking for. Vice Chairman Schwinger called a 10 minute recess at 9:00 o'clock. The meeting was called back to order by the Vice Chairman with the same members present. David Washington came back for rebuttal. He said he has been listening to the citizens, and he appreciates Mr. Barfield's suggestions. Mr. Washington said there were no complaints against the C-l request. He said the complaint of the R-B, the R-B would access into R-3 by way of Amundson or Cannon Drive; either way would be acceptable. Mr. Washington said they could add a 200 foot wide strip of office zoning to 0 provide a buffer. He said it would be an ideal buffer to the residential. Mr. Washington said they had proposed Amundson to move over 25 feet, but the Master Plan shows it straight. Mr. Marks came back for rebuttal. He said the general conscious is the citizens are willing to nogotiate. He said if they will designate 200 feet and will not use it. Mr. Wood said they would. Mr. Bowen said if we make a recommendation of 200 feet for office zoning, not Industrial, it would solve your fears. I Page 15 P & Z Minutes August 11, 1988 Ie I I I I I I I Ie PZ 88-11 APPROVED I PZ 88-12 APPROVED I I PZ 88-13 APPROVED I I I I Ie I ( r Vice Chairman Schwinger closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Barfield said he appreciates the citizens coming. He said he visited with the land owners and can see their apprehensions and fears. He said he feels we can come to an agreement to put an office complex as a buffer. Mr. Barfield said he could not agree to Industrial backing up to their houses. He said he feels there is a workable solution. Ms. Flippo asked what if the road is moved. Mr. Bowen said if the 200 feet is Office zoning, it could be a green belt. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 88-11. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. Mr. Tricoli made the motion to approve PZ 88-12. This motion was seconded by Mr. Barfield and the motion carried 4-3 with Mr. Bowen, Mr. Lueck, and Vice Chairman Schwinger voting against. Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PZ 88-13 with the stipulation that the property adjacent to the residential zoning on the west side, Mr. Delp's and Mr. Scoma's property, and Sunny Meadows and the R-3 have a 200 foot wide strip zoned Office, low rise offices and the land which lies north of Watauga Road be something like C-l zoning. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0. I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .. \, ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas July 27, 1988 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 88-13 REVIEY LETTER, ZONING FROM R-3 TO I-I REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 88 Ye have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. To accelerate the zoning review process, we would recommend that a vicinity map be shown on all future zoning request submittals. .s.'-S'A~ ~\ Sc\.-.~~ ~ SUSAN L. SCHYINGER, G.C.E. SLS/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic Development Director Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning Zoning Review PZ 88-13 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I , ORDINANCE NO. 1564 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE DI080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-13 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-3 to I-I. BEING 57.271 acres of land located in the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055 and the L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1652, Tarrant County, Texas and being the same tract of land as conveyed by deed to John C. Cook, recorded in Volume 7620, Page 525 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. Said 57.271 acres of l~d being more particularly descr~ed by m~tes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2 inch iron rod at the southwest corner of said John C. Cook Tract, also being the most westerly northwest corner of the tract of land conveyed to Charles H. Mangham, Nancy Jane Renfrow, and the Estate of James H. Mangham, recorded in Volume 6747, Page 1784 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 00 degrees 03 minutes 08 seconds West, 1,030.95 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod at the southeast corner of Sunny Meadows Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; THENCE along the east line of said Sunny Meadows Addition as follows: (1) North 00 degrees 04 minutes 37 seconds East, 442.85 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod; (2) North 01 degrees 53 minutes 53 seconds West, 50.41 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod; (3) North 00 degrees 48 minutes 00 seconds West, 126.99 feet to a 1 inch pipe at the northeast corner of said Sunny Meadows Addition, and being the southeast corner of the tract of land conveyed to Horace R. Childress, and wife Julie F. Childress, recorded in Volume 6080, Page 620 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 00 degrees 30 minutes 33 seconds East, 711.35 feet along the east line of said Childress Tract to a 1/2 inch iron rod in the south right-of-way line of Cardinal Road; I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I , Page 2 THENCE along the south and west right-of-way line of Cardinal Road as follows: (1) North 89 degrees 37 minutes 02 seconds East, 873.92 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod; (2) South 81 degrees 34 minutes 23 seconds East, 99.09 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod; (3) South 65 degrees 11 minutes 04 seconds East, 76.76 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod; (4) South 45 degrees 04 minutes 24 seconds East, 78.30 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod; (5) South 32 degrees 23 minutes 18 seconds East, 58.60 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod; (6) South 19 degrees 22 minutes 01 seconds East, 58.46 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod; (7) South 04 degrees 20 minutes 07 seconds East, 86.60 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod; (8) South 01 degrees 13 minutes 39 seconds East, 669.29 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod in the north line of the aforesaid Charles H. Mangham Tract; THENCE North 86 degrees 57 minutes 11 seconds West, 180.02 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod at the northwest corner of said Charles H. Mangham Tract; THENCE Sou th 00 degrees 11 minutes 00 seconds East, 1,410.34 feet along the east line of said Charles H. Mangham Tract to a 1/2 inch iron rod at a fence post; THENCE South 89 degrees 41 minutes 20 seconds West, 995.97 feet to the place of beginning and containing 57.271 acres of land. , f I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 3 This property is located on Cardinal Lane, south of Sunnybrook Addition, and east of Sunny Meadows Addition. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF AUGUST, 1988 with the stipulation that the property adjacent to the residential zoning on the west side, Mr. Delp's and Mr. Scoma's property, and Sunny Meadows and the R-3 have a 200 foot wide strip zoned Office, low rise offices and the land which lies north of Watauga Road be something like C-l zoning. ~~ SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-88-13 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY .: . ,......_.......~~.. ,:JÎ I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance Department: Subject: Public Hearing - Operating Budget for ,It'lscaJ. Year 1~88/89 C 'I M ' D 9/12/88 - ouncl eetlng ate: Agenda Number: GN 88-70 The Public Notice for the Budget Hearing on the Operating Budget for fiscal year 1988/89 was published in the Northeast section of the Star Telegram on Wednesday, September 7, 1988 and the Mid-Cities Newspaper on Sunday, September 4, 1988. Attached is the schedule of proposed changes as a resul t of the Budget Retreat Workshop held on August 20, 1988 and the All Funds Suntnary as æœnded per the Budget Retreat Workshop. The detail budget schedules and proposed tax CClTIpUtations will be available at Monday's Public Hearing. Recornnendation: Open public hearing on the budget as sulmitted and allow all interested persons to be heard for or against any i tern therein. Close public hearing and establish September 26, 1988 as the date for adopting the operating budget, granting of exemptions, and setting of the tax rate for fiscal year 1988/89. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient E ds Available N/A Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I ~ I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RECONCILIATION OF PROPOSED EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND rOPOSED BUDGET AS PRESENTED TO CITY COUNCIL AT BUDGET WORKSHOP $11,599,208 lity Council - Decrease in General Services ornmunity Development - Transfer of Fire Inspector to the Fire Department ILbrary - Deletion of Children's Librarian position - Decrease in funds for part-time/hourly ~lice - Funding of School Crossing Guard (Starnes & Holiday) - Funding of (4) Police Officers for 6 months Ire - Net effect of transferring Fire Inspector from Community Development (+$34,902) anà deleting a newly hired .... Firefighter/EMT position (-$28,483). ~yed implementation of Employee Benefits Package (5,811) (34,902) (23,359)~ 3,500 69,352 6,419 (49,333) IT DECREASE OTAL BUDGET AS ADJUSTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 ------------ (34,134) --------~--- $1.1~565,074 * I I I I I ~ I I -----~------ ------------ * It is proposed by the Library Director that the reduction of one position in the Library be in the Children's Services area rather than Technical Services as tentatively deciàeà by the City Council on August 20, 1988. This will involve the layoff of one recently hired Children's Librarian rather than an employee with 17 years experience. Duties in the Children's Department will be divided among several other employees. ** City Council was apprised at the Budget Workshop that $5,000 was inadvertently deleted from Crime Prevention Services. Those funds are used to purchase educational supplies for various citizen and youth training programs. This is a very popular and important program and it is believed that City Council should be made aware that this item is not included in the proposed budget. I Ie I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RECONCILIATION OF PROPOSED EXPENDITURES IUTILITY FUND: Proposed Expenditures as presented to City Council I at Budget Retreat Delayed implementation of Employee Benefits Package Iproposed Expenditures as Adjusted $12,143,919 (2,328) ------------- $12,141,591 I GEN/UTIL erp: ------------- ------------- IProposed Expenditures as presented to City Council at Buàget Retreat ~aYed implementation of Employee Benefits Package Deletion of Construction Inspector position (vacant) I Proposed Expenditures as Adjusted $440,462 (493) (14,644) ------------- $425.,325 I ------------- ------------- PROMOTIONAL FUND: ~roposed Expenditures as presented to City Council at Budget Retreat lÞelayed implementation of Employee Benefits Package $110,927 (218) Itroposed Expenditures as Adjusted ------------- $110,709 ------------- ------------- I Ie I I I I. I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RECONCILIATION OF PROPOSED EXPENDITURES I MANAGEMENT SERVICES: I Proposed Expenditures as presented to City Council at Budget Retreat I Delayed implementation of Employee Benefits Package Increase in funding for TMRS which was calculated incorrectly I Proposed Expenditures as Adjusted I I Proposed Expenditures as presented to City Council at Budget Retreat ~laYed implementation of Employee Benefits Package SELF-INSURANCE: I Proposed Expenditures as Adjusted I I I I I I. I I $2,079,371 (134) 678 ------------- $2,079,915 ------------- ------------- $1,226,188 (494) ------------- $1,225,694 ------------- ------------- 'I I CITY OF NORm RICHIAND HILIS EXPENDITURES BY ACTIVITY & DEPAR'IMENT GENERAL FUND I PROJECTED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUIX;ET ACTUAL PROPOSED 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1987-88 1988-89 I Mayor and Council $ 72,858 $ 50,373 $ 58,592 $ 56,610 $ 52,299 I Ci ty Manager 191,405 200,786 203,062 208,062 231,252 City Secretary 121,141 127,221 165,461 160,612 179,829 I legal 61,206 52,305 77,857 69,232 83,928 Civil Service 79,039 93,780 91,173 90,549 26,536 I Finance 881,450 485,303 471,390 446,130 465,683 I Management Services/ Purchasing -0- 296,185 127,156 147,555 121,241 Econanic Develoµnent 498,454 416,724 164,010 132,322 99,271 Mgmt Infonnation Sys. -0- -0- 171,563 167,455 214,315 I Municipal Court 147,895 182,298 229,375 198,247 229,442 Carmunity Develoµnent -0- -0- 448,527 387,106 - 426,147 1 Library 356,357 470,015 514,914 482,328 547,684 Environmental Services -0- -0- 176,641 176,641 225,977 I Public Works 1,248,330 1,266,642 1,344,121 1,228,727 1,273,811 Park & Recreation 377,404 501,821 679,723 655,773 659,309 I Police 2,333,700 2,982,829 3,354,341 3,172,887 3,689,239 I Fire 1,510,077 2,137,297 2,370,231 2,119,861 2,287,756 Non-Departmental 162,239 271,203 716,306 658,322 751,355 I 'Ibtal General Ftmd $8,041,555 $9,534,782 $11,364,443 $10,558,419 $11,565,074 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I "- " I (V) C) LO 'n 1.0 0') II . 00 ('Y') ~ r0- O") C"'\.I C) .. I U"') C) ("I") ('Y') <.0 It I -..J ... u I. I «: (Y) C'l ..q- r- LO U I f- en ro- ~ c:::t t- C) If . 0 In C"'\.I C"') ..q ~ C'l C"') U I r- ~ ~ ...,. ~ ~ &I (f) ("r) !I 0 ~ ~ U Z .. ::::::> LU It lL. U " I z If l.U < " U a:::: C) en 00 !..O q- J - => e:::> CY') Ln C"'\.I In C"'\.I en tI > U') <.0 ~ ..q C"') t.O tI a:: Z ... ! I OJ - <.0 C"'\.I ~ \.t") " U') I (,C) !..O C) C"'\.I tl lJ... ..,.. C"'\.I II I --' --' ... U ~ UJ , , ::z U) ~ " a:::: !l U.... " J- " z: tI - I- C"'\.I C) C) <.0 I:"- C) 1.0 H I :z (f) 00 e:::> Ln ~ C"') e:::> " · LU UJ 00 ~ !'"- 1:"- e:::> en " I I :.E <...> ... II , t.U - c:::> C) C"'\.I C'.I <.0 r- 0') " · (!) ::>- U") 0') 1:"- en 0') r0- t- tI I < ex: ~ C'I CY') ('Y) C"'\.I <"I c:::> II · :z w ..... .. II I < U) C'.I U ........... .:E ~ " IJ " I a I' II " " U") ("r) ~ en t- en If ........... -.:to 00 en C'.I CY') 0') t- .. · 00 en -.:to L.t') c:::> C) 0") It , -..J ... II Z t < U") C) ~ <.0 C) 00 If I 3 J f- e-- .q- <.0 00 CY') r- :.D " · 0 00 CY') r- ~ 0') U") II .... t J- ... ~ ... If < · en r- 1:"- t- " <-> ... ~ ~ ~ C'.I " - ~ II u.. It - It tI) tJ I Cf) --' " < < en C) c:::> C) C) C) 0') II --' :z: <.0 U") 0") C) " u e <.0 ~ U") t- H .. ! t W J- 00 ~ r- c:::> .. a:::: 0 ~ U"') It => ~ ...,. II J0- e ..,... " I - Q:: If U') 0 0- n -J ;;z U U) -J LU " -u - 0- · II C :::r: x t If :::J W t r- c:::> C"\I c:::> 1.0 1.0 U u_ C J --I 00 q- r- C'I.I C'.I It tn I· z C I - CY') ~ t.O 00 (Y) " ro Q) «: :z: · t- ~ .. II C --I < I :::> - ~ r- U") :I ~ "- :J:: , ........... <...> In CY') C'.I C"'\.I II r- .µ U 0 en · :z (V) ~ u CD 10 >-4 ;;Z 00 I l.U ~ ~ II .µ c- Ot: ::::::> . · (!) II ro OJ u.... 00 (f) It c- o.. :::r: 00 0 Jf ro 0 .... >- 0') Z JI a.. a::: co ::::> ! . Q) I 0 t.L.. U tn to :z ~ c:::> C) C) C) c:::> C) C) " c.. fLI <!) >- .... C) c:::> C) c:::> C) II -c Q) u.. c:> ;;Z ~ a:::: C) c:::> C) C) <::) H Q) C 0 Co::) - < ... .. +J Q) ~ I- ~ a:::: CY') ('\") C) r- II ro ~ >- 00 < a:: co 1.0 ~ If r- I- a::: < - ~ U :::::J Q) - (!) W 0- .....J 11 U -C: Ü :z: a.. IJ r-- ..s...J I - 0 II ro "- If U C < --' H a:::: < LU :t Q,) J..u a::: U U c... 00 ~ W - c:::> c:::> c:::> <::) C) C) C) If ro Q) 0 Z > .... 00 00 " c.. UJ a:::: C"'\.I C'.I at 00 :::J -..J (!:) UJ ... u -c .µ I <I.: I (f) en en tJ C 10- , <.0 t.O II :::::J "'0 0 J .... C"'\.I C'.I II u.. C t- t CD ... U '3J I UJ C"') (V) " Q) CL , C) ~ II U X . JJ "; Q) , II J II c... (f) I I II Q) to , 0') C"'\.I C) U") U"') .;:::) JJ Cf) t en (V) 1.r) C) I...t') U") en II -0 I >- 00 c:::> C"'\.I CY') en 1L') " Q) I I- .. " ro -.::J t - C"'\.I Ln C) r- C"'\.I CY') I! C :::J I ....J <D ~ ~ .q- <.0 00 ~ H c- , - -d" ('Y) C'.I C) C"'\.I ~ II Q) U I I- .. II .f.J C , ::::::> c..o ('\"') C"'\.I " c: "- I t ~ " - I .... II 0 J H Q) (.') I " -C. I II .µ to t .. I <D .q ~ 'c:t' -.. C"'\.I .q If c.. Q,) · 0') U") ~ U") <::) C'.I r- It 0 c... , .....J 00 C) C"'\.I en ~ ('Y') C) " "f- to I I < .. II · a:::: en r- oo c:::> ""d- ~ Ln II ( ') J UJ C) U") U") ~ C"'\.I (.0 .. en E I :z: C) C7) ("'r) <.0 \on I I Q) Q) · UJ .. II c... +J I (!) co " :::J I 4.4- tl .µ , .... II "- CD '""- .. -c (I) I. e: Q) Q) ..r:::. c.. .u U) X QJ 1.U c- U 0 .; r- 1.4- to (þ c- +..Þ tn tJ Q) 0 CD I c (f) ~ 0') CD en to c- C W C to to C .- OJ ro :>, 10 .µ ..r:::. 0 .u c... c... .µ 0 U tI) c.. "~ OJ ""0 "0. t- LU c.. 0. C C ~ Q) OJ :::::J to Q) :::J to 0 ~ ~ en .E C!) en u ::z .µ I I .. Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I ,I I Ie I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ANALYSIS OF AD VALOREM TAX REQUIREMENTS FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 Proposeà General Funà Operating Budget $11,565,074 Revenues (Net of Ad Valorem Tax) 8,628,343 -------------- Amount Required to Balance 2,936,731 Collection Rate 97% -------------- Requirements from Ad Valorem Tax 3,027,558 Estimated loss from ARB Hearings 66,118 -------------- Total General Fund Requirement 3,093,676 Debt Service Requirement 3,269,280 -------------- Tax Levy Required 6,362,956 Taxable Value 1,446,751,304 Tax Rate $0.4398 -------------- -------------- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Administration Department: ~ Revised Auditorium Policy ·SUbject: I I I I I I Recommendation: I Approve attached revised Auditorium Policy. Ie I 9/12/88 - Council Meeting Date: GN 88-71 Agenda Number: On August 28th, 1987 the City Council approved a policy regarding the use of the then new City auditorium. Although these policies were well intended they have proven to be very restrictive to the extent that full utilization of that facility has not been realized. The staff is proposing minor changes to the Auditorium Policy including a provision that it be governed by generally the same guidelines as those afforded the other rental rooms of 1,801 square feet or above. Special conditions will still exist for AARP, NEFAl, as well as other special interest nonprofit organizations. A major change proposed is that an entrance fee is permitted for various activities being held to help offset the cost of rental. limited food and drinks (coffee and snacks) will also be permitted in the auditorium, the same as any other rental facilities. If an organization other than a nonprofit organization charges an entrance fee or sells products or services, a charge equal to 5% of the gross sales plus those rental rates established by ordinance will be assessed. This policy is consistent with other cities operating auditoriums. This change has been coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Board and library Board. ~ ~ ,····.··'·'·'··.-'··,.·'.,..1 i1 ~I ~ Bonds (GO/Rev.) operat~. Budget _ Other _ ~<11IvwtA Department Head Signature Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available f:~ City Manager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I ~ Ie I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I ~ I I ~ NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AUDITORIUM POLICY The Director of Parks and Recreation will schedule all activities in the auditorium based on the following guidelines. A) First priority for use of the auditorium is the Municipal Court and Teen Court of North Richland Hills. B) Other City business and programs may use the auditorium on a scheduled basis as approved by the Parks and Recreation Director or his designee. C) Single events where no entrance fees are charged and conducted by nonprofit, cultural or civil organizations may be scheduled upon the approval of the Parks and Recreation Director or his designee. The fees established for such activities will be in accordance with Ordinance 1485 and Parks and Recreation policies. Other fees, as required, may be charged to using organizations for any damage done to City property or any overtime that may be required by City employees (opening or closing of building). D) No scheduled activities may be of a political, religious or fund raising nature. E} Limited food and beverage may be served in the auditorium. F) If an approved event, other than one conducted by a nonprofit organization, and an entrance fee is charged and a product or service is sold, a charge equal to five percent of the gross sales, plus rental rates, as established by Ordinance 1485, and Paragraph C above will be assessed. G) Permission to use the auditorium does not in any way constitute agreement with, or endorsement of, any group's policies or beliefs. H) The Director of Parks and Recreation will formulate rules and procedures governing conduct in the room, serving of food and beverage, room set up and any other rules as may be necessary. ~~~ , -or "'..)~~~ "'~j,;,..n-)~~_....._,..-";....,.,...,.,,.-" I· I I I I I I I Department: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance . . . 9/12/88 Or'd i rldfl(';~ Au tJ,ur i £ ; fI~ th~ I SSUdnce of - Council Meeting Date: "City of North Richland Hills Tax and Golf Course Revenue GN 88-72 Revenue Cer liri(';dt~~ uf OLl igatioll, Set ies 1900" Agenda Number: Ordinance No. 1565 Subject: At its August 8, 1988 meeting the City Council authorized the Staff to advertise the intention to sell Certificates of Obligations in an amount not to exceed $4,500,000 for the purpose of constructing a golf course. The proposed issuance has been properly advertised. In accordance with State requirements, the City Council must adopt an'Ordinance authorizing the issuance of said Certificates of Obligations in the amount of $4,230,000., which is the amount that has been determined to be required. Bids will be opened at 4:00 p.m. on Monday, September 12th. They will be tabulated and analyzed by First Southwest Company and a recommendation will be provided at the City Council Meeting. Clayton Brown & Associates, Inc. submitted the best of the seven bids received, with a net interest cost of $4,275,530.86 and an effective interest rate of 7.489762%. All bids were within a range of .20% with the "cover" of second lowest bid within .01% of the lowest bid. First Southwest Company has verified that the bids conform to the specifications and contain no mathmatical errors. The interest rates are in the market, well b~low the 7.67% of the Bond Buyer Index and the 8.00% as illustrated in the Official Statement. All bids provide for the purchase of Muncipal Bond Insurance. The bonds will be insured by MBIA, a municipal bond insurance company, at a premium of $29,600.00. The bonds, which are rated "A/AA", will benefit from MBA "Aaa/AAA" bond ratings. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council take the following actions: 1. Accept the lowest and best bid of Clayton Brown & Associates on said Certificates of Obligation as recommended by First Southwest Company. 2. Adopt Ordinance No. 1565 authorizing the issuance of $4,230,000 of City of North Richland Hills Tax and Golf Course Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1988. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other_ /;J ~ ~~... 'OS' / Department Head Signature Acct. Number SUff~S Available ~ íéfr~ City Manager , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REQUEST THE CITY COUNCIL TO TRANSACT THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS IN RELATION TO THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION: 1. Motion and second to accept the bid of Clayton Brown & Associates, Inc. for the purchase of $4,230,000 "City of North Richland Hills, Texas, Tax and Golf Course Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1988", dated September 1, 1988, at a net effective interest rate of 7.489762 %. 2. Motion and second to pass an Ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE authorizing the issuance of "CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, TAX AND GOLF COURSE REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1988"; specifying the terms and features of said certificates; providing for the payment of said certificates of obligation by the levy of an ad valorem tax upon all taxable property within the Ci ty and a pledge of the net revenues recei ved from the City's Golf Course Facilities; and resolving other matters incident and relating to the issuance, payment, security, sale and delivery of said Certificates, including the approval and distribution of an Official Statement pertaining thereto; and providing an effective date." 3. Motion and second to pass a Resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION approving and authorizing the execution of a "Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement" in relation to the nCi ty of North Richland Hi lIs, Texas, Tax and Golf Course Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1988" and resolving other matters incident and related thereto." , I I I I I I OFFICIAL BID FORM \ , , Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills, Texas September 12, 1988 ~embers of the City Council: Reference is made to your Official Statement and Notice of Sale and Bidding Instructions, dated August 31, 1988, of $4,230,000 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS TAX AND GOLF COURSE REVENUE CER TIFICA TES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1988, both of which cons ti tute a part hereof. For your legally issued Certificates, as described in said Notice of Sale and Bidding Instructions and Official Statement, we will p~1~ar and accrued interest from date of issue to date of delivery to us, plus a cash premium of $ for Certificates maturing and bearing interest as follows: Principal Interest Principal Interes t \ia turi ty Amount ~ Ma turi ty Amount ~ 9-1-1991 $105,000 ~% 9-1-2000 $225,000 ~% 9-1-1992 120,000 % 9-1-2001 245,000 13t)% 9-1-1993 130,000 % 9-1-2002 265,000 I,,! Ò36 9-1-1994 145,000 % 9-1-2003 285,000 /. '-fÒro 9-1-1995 160,000 % 9-1-2004 305,000 ~5ð% 9-1-1996 170,000 96 9-1-2005 330,000 1~96 9-1-1997 185,000 96 9-1-2006 355,000 ?,Sb % 9-1-1998 195,000 - % 9-1-2007 385,000 ~96 9-1-1999 210,000 '.70 % 9-1-2008 415,000 ~.Sð% Our calculation (which is not a part of this bid) of the interest cost from the above is: Total Interest Cost $ ~ ¡?S; StfO.OO Sq.lY- $ ~(~1r, ~O.8~ ? '1 'ð,?" L-% Less Premi urn NET INTEREST COST EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE We ar.e,~a1ng the Certificates of the fOllowin,¡ßa>u~ties M. insured by ~~ at a premium of $ ~ ~~ (excluding any fees to be paid by the Purchaser to rating agencies). The Initial Certificate shall be registered in the name of (},~ k>~ ~ Ll O. . We will advise Mr. Gerald Mitchell, Corporate Trust Division, Texas A~~~ican Bank/Fort Worth, N.A., P. O. Box 2050, Fort W orth, Texas 76113 (817 338-8610), the Paying Agent/Registrar, our registration instructions at least five business days prior to the date set for Initial Delivery. ~. , A Cashier's Check of the Bank,·, in the amount of $84,600.00, which represents our Good ait Deposit (is attache hereto or has been made available to you prior to the opening of this bid), and is submitted in accordance with the terms as set forth in the Official Statement and ~otice of Sale and Bidding Instructions. We agree to accept delivery of and make payment for the Certificates in immediately available funds in the Corporate Trust Division, Texas American Bank/Fort Worth, N.A., Fort Worth, Texas, not later than 10:00 AM, COT, on October 11, 1988, or thereafter on the date the Certificates are tendered for delivery, pursuant to the terms set forth in the Notice of Sale and Bidding Instructions. The undersigned agrees to complete, execute, and deliver to the City, at least six business days prior to delivery of the Certificates, a certificate relating to the "issue price" of the Certificates in the form and to the effect accompanying the ~otice of Sale and Bidding Instructions, with such changes thereto as may be acceptable to the City. Respectfully submitted, CLAYTON BROWN Be ASSOCIATES, IHe. ~ \ Geri Schroeder.A.'lP. By ~ ~ l~rW\J..~r~ Authorized Re~sentative ACCEPTANCE CLAUSE ~l ~-5Sq- liocg3 The above and foregoing bid is hereby in all things accepted by the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, this the 12th day of September, 1988. ATTEST: Mayor City of North Richland Hills, Texas City Secretary /~ Prepared by I I I I I Firat Y' ~ Company TABULATION RECEIVED AT OF BIDS SALE OF $4,230,000 -CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TAX AND GOLF COURSE REVENUE BONDS SERIES 1988 GROSS ACCOUNT MANAGER INTEREST COST LESS PRE~ I UN NET EFFECTIVE INTEREST COST INTEREST ~~i Clayton Brown & Associates, Inc. $4,275,590.00 $59.14 $4,275,530.86 7.489762% - Prudential Bache Securities, Inc. & Associates $4,279,432.50 -0- $4,279,432.50 7.4965% I Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. & & Associates $4,319,738.75 -0- $4,319,738.75 7.5672046% I I -Í I- I 1-1- I .-- MBaT - -;~a1 Markets & Associate ~ ----- f' "." ' -"-:,:<,,,.-::~~.:_"~,; :i"/.:·_":-\::,.q;::i~~~~¿_.,~:,., , '" .., ., 'J"" ~. . J"f"""'" I · I [:artment: I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Financê Council Meeting Date: 9/12/88 GN 88-73 Agenda Number: Subject: Resolution Approving and Authorizing the :Execution of a "Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement" - Resolution No. 88-32 In accordance with State and Federal requirements for issuing 1:x:mded indebtedness, a Paying Agent/Registrar bank Imlst be selected to administer payments on said Certificates of Obligation. The City's Financial Advisor, Mr. Harold McInroe of First Southwest Canpany, solici ted bids fran various banks for said agreemPJlt and has recœmended Texas American Bank-Fort Worth based on the fee structure and past performance in seJ:Ving the Ci ty of North Richland Hills. Reccmnendation: It is recœmended that Resolution No. 88-32 be approved authorizing Texas American Bank-Fort Worth as Paying Agent/Registrar in connection wi th the payment of the principal premium, and interest in said securities. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number ~ Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available Operating Budget ~ . '--;r77 I Other ~ /::J -,..n~.: 1<-U.. ., , /~ ~ /'/~ Rfi/~ ;;1 Department Head Signa~;;y COUNCIL ACTION ITE~ City Manager Page 1 of N/A Finance Director I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -. I I ~,) RESOLUTION NO. 88-32 A RESOLUTION approving and authorizing the execution of a "Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement" in relation to the "City of North Richland Hills, Texas, Tax and Golf Course Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1988" and resolving other matters incident and related thereto. WHEREAS, on this date the Ci ty Counci I of the Ci ty of North Richland Hills, Texas authorized the issuance of "City of North Richland Hills, Texas, Tax and Golf Course Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1988", in the principal amount of $4,230,000 (the "Securities"); such securities to be issued in fully registered form only; and WHEREAS, in relation to the payment, registration, transfer and exchange of said Securities, the Paying Agent/Registrar selected therefor is TEXAS AMERICAN BANK/FORT WORTH, N.A., Fort Worth, Texas; and WHEREAS, a "Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement" by and between the City and said Bank has been prepared and submitted to the City Council for approval and execution, such Agreement, setting forth the duties and responsibilities of the Paying Agent/Registrar for such Securi ties, being attached hereto as Exhibi t A and incorporated herein by reference as a part of this Resolution for all purposes; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that such "Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement" should be approved and execution of the same for and on behalf of the City authorized; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS that the "Paying Agent/Registrar Agreement" by and between the City and TEXAS AMERICAN BANK/FORT WORTH, N.A., Fort Worth, Texas relating to the above described Securities, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby approved as to form and content, and the Mayor and Ci ty Secretary of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such Agreement in sUbstantially the same form and content herein approved for and on behalf of the City and as the act and deed of this City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED, this September 12, 1988. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS ATTEST: Mayor City Secretary (City Seal) 4434C I I. I I I I I I I lit I I I I I I Ie I I EXHIBIT 1 PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT entered into as of September 12, 1988 (this "Agreement..), by and between the City of North Richland Hills, Texas (the "Issuer"), and Texas American Bank/Fort Worth, N.A., Fort Worth, Texas, a banking association duly organized and existing under the I aws of the Uni ted States of America, (the "Bank"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Issuer has duly authorized and provided for the issuance of its "City of North Richland Hills, Texas, Tax and Golf Course Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1988" (the "Securities") in the aggregate principal amount of $4 I 230,000, such Securi ties to be issued in fully registered form only as to the payment of principal and interest thereon; and WHEREAS, the Securities are scheduled to be delivered to the initial purchasers thereof on or about October 11, 1988; and WHEREAS, the Issuer has selected the Bank to serve as Paying Agent/Registrar in connection wi th the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on said Securi ties and with respect to the registration, transfer and exchange thereof by the registered owners thereof; and WHEREAS, the Bank has agreed to serve in such capacities for and on behalf of the Issuer and has full power and· authori ty to perform and serve as Paying Agent/Registrar for the Securities; NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows: ARTICLE ONE APPOINTMENT OF BANK AS PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR Section 1.01. Appointment. The Issuer hereby appoints the Bank to serve as Paying Agent with respect to the Securities, and, as Paying Agent for the Securi ties I the Bank shall be responsible for paying on behalf of the Issuer the principal, premium (if any), and interest on the Securi ties as the same become due and payable to the registered owners thereof; all in accordance with this Agreement and the "Bond Resolution" (hereinafter defined). I I. I I I I I I I tt I I I I I I I Ie I I The Issuer hereby appoints the Bank as Registrar with respect to the Securities and, as Registrar for the Securities, the Bank shall keep and maintain for and on behalf of the Issuer books and records as to the ownership of said Securi ties and wi th respect to the transfer and exchange thereof as provided herein and in the "Bond Resolution". The Bank hereby accepts its appointment, and agrees to serve as the Paying Agent and Registrar for the Securities. Section 1.02. Compensation. As compensation for the Bank' s services as Paying Agent/Registrar, the Issuer hereby agrees to pay the Bank the fees and amounts set forth in Annex A attached hereto for the first year of this Agreement and thereafter the fees and amounts set forth in the Bank' s current fee schedule then in effect for services as Paying Agent/Registrar for municipalities, which shall be supplied to the Issuer on or before 90 days prior to the close of the Fiscal Year of the Issuer, and shall be effective upon the first day of the fallowing Fiscal Year. In addition, the Issuer agrees to reimburse the Bank upon its request for all reasonable expenses, disbursements and advances incurred or made by the Bank in accordance with any of the provisions hereof (including the reasonable compensation and the expenses and disbursements of its agents and counsel). ARTICLE TWO DEFINITIONS Section 2.01. Definitions. For all purposes of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires: "Acceleration Date" on any Security means the date on and after which the principal or any or all installments of interest, or both, are due and payable on any Security which has become accelerated pursuant to the terms of the Security. "Bank Office" means the principal corporate trust office of the Bank as indicated on page 12 hereof. The Bank will notify the Issuer in writing of any change in location of the Bank Office. -2- I I. I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I. I I "Bond Resolution" means the resolution, order, or ordinance of the governing body of the Issuer pursuant to which the Securities are issued, certified by the Secretary or any other officer of the Issuer and delivered to the Bank. "Fiscal Year" means the fiscal year of the Issuer, ending September 30th. "Ho lder" and "Secur i ty Ho lder It each means the Person in whose name a Security is registered in the Security Register. "I ssuer Request II and .. I ssuer Order II means a wri tten request or order signed in the name of the Issuer by the Mayor, City Secretary, City Manager or Director of Finance, .any one or more of said officials, and delivered to the Bank. "Legal Holiday" means a day on which the Bank is required or authorized to be closed. "Person" means any individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, j oint stock company, trust, unincorporated organization or government or any agency or political subdivision of a government. "Predecessor Securi ties" of any particular Securi ty means every previous Security evidencing all or a portion of the same obligation as that evidenced by such particular Securi ty (and, for the purposes of this· definition, any mutilated, lost, destroyed, or stolen Security for which a replacement Security has been registered and delivered in lieu thereof pursuant to Section 4.06 hereof and the Resolution). "Redemption Date" when used with respect to any Bond to be redeemed means the date fixed for such redemption pursuant to the terms of the Bond Resolution. "Respons ibIe Of f icer II when used wi th respect to the Bank means the Chairman or Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Chairman or Vice-Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors, the President, any Vice President, the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, the Treasurer, any Assistant Treasurer, the Cashier, any -3- I I. I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I Assistant Cashier, any Trust Officer or Assistant Trust Officer, or any other officer of the Bank customarily performing functions similar to those performed by any of the above designated officers and also means, with respect to a particular corporate trust matter, any other officer to whom such matter is referred because of his knowledge of and familiarity with the particular subject. "Security Register" means a register maintained by the Bank on behalf of the Issuer providing for the registration and transfers of Securities. "Stated Maturi ty" means the date specified in the Bond Resolution the principal of a Securi ty is scheduled to be due and payable. Section 2..02. Other Definitions. The terms "Bank," "Issuer," and "Securities (Security)" have the meanings assigned to them in the recital paragraphs of this Agreement. The term "Paying Agent/Registrar" refers to the Bank in the performance of the duties and functions of this Agreement. ARTICLE THREE PAYING AGENT Section 3.01. Duties of Paying Agent. As Paying Agent, the Bank sha 11, provided adequate collected funds have been provided to it for such purpose by or on behalf of the Issuer, pay on behalf of the Issuer the principal of each Securi ty at its Stated Maturi ty, Redemption Date, or Acceleration Date, to the Holder upon surrender of the Security to the Bank at the Bank Office. As Paying Agent, the Bank shall, provided adequate collected funds have been provided to it for such purpose by or on behalf of the Issuer, pay on behalf of the Issuer the interest on each Security when due, by computing the amount of interest to be paid' each Holder and preparing and sending checks by United States Mail, first class postage prepaid, on each payment date, to the Holders of the Securities (or their Predecessor Securities) on the Record Date, to the address appearing on the Security Register or by such other method, acceptable to the Bank, requested in wri ting by the Holder at the Holder's risk and expense. -4- I I. I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I. I I Section 3.02. Payment Dates. The Issuer hereby instructs the Bank to pay the principal of and interest on the Securities at the dates specified in the Bond Resolution. ARTICLE FOUR REGISTRAR Section 4.01. Security Register - Transfers and Exchanges. The Bank agrees to keep and maintain for and on behalf oe the Issuer at the Bank Office books and records (herein sometimes referred to as the "Security Register") for recording the names and addresses of the Holders of the Securi ties I the transfer, exchange and replacement of the Securi ties and the payment of the principal of and interest on the Securities to the Holders and containing such other information as may be reasonably required by the Issuer and subject to such reasonable regulations as the I ssuer and Bank may prescribe. All transfers, exchanges and replacement of Securities shall be noted in the Security Register. Every Security surrendered for transfer or exchange shall be duly endorsed or be accompanied by a wri tten instrument of transfer, the signature on which has been guaranteed by an officer of a federal or state bank or a member of the National Association of Securi ties Dealers, in form satisfactory to the Bank, duly executed by the Holder thereof or his agent duly authorized in writing. The Bank may request any supporting documentation it feels necessary to effect a re-registration, transfer or exchange of the Securities. To the extent possible and under reasonable circumstances, the Bank agrees that, in relation to an exchange or transfer of Securities, the exchange or transfer by the Holders thereof will be completed and new Securities delivered to the Holder or the assignee of the Holder in not more than three (3) business days after the receipt of the Securities to be cancelled in an exchange or transfer and the written instrument of transfer or request for exchange duly executed by the Holder I or his duly authorized agent, in form and manner satisfactory to the Paying Agent/Registrar. -5- I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I Section 4.02. Certificates. The Issuer shall provide an adequate inventory of printed Securities to facilitate transfers or exchanges thereof. The Bank covenants that the inventory of printed Securities will be kept in safekeeping pending their use and reasonable care will be exercised by the Bank in maintaining such Securi ties in safekeeping, which shall be not less than the care maintained by the Bank for debt securities of other governments or corporations for which it serves as registrar, or that is maintained for its own securities. Section 4.03. Form of Security Register. The Bank, as Registrar, will maintain the Security Register relating to the registration, payment, transfer and exchange of the Securities in accordance with the Bank's general practices and procedures in effect from time to time. The Bank shall not be obligated to maintain such Security Register in any form other than those which the Bank has currently available and currently utilizes at the time. The Security Register may be maintained in written form or in any other form capable of being converted into written form within a reasonable time. Section 4.04. List of Security Holders. The Bank will provide the Issuer at any time requested by the Issuer, upon payment of the requi red fee a copy of the information contained in the Security Register. The Issuer may- also inspect the information contained in the Security Register at any time the Bank is customarily open for business, provided that reasonable time is allowed the Bank to provide an up-to-date listing or to convert the information into wri tten form. The Bank will not release or disclose the contents of the Security Register to any person other than to, or at the written request of, an authorized officer or employee of the Issuer, except upon receipt of a subpoena or court order. Upon receipt of a subpoena or court order the Bank will notify the Issuer so that the Issuer may contest the subpoena or court order. Section 4.05. Return of Cancelled Certificates. The Bank will, at such reasonable intervals as it determines, surrender to the Issuer, Securities in lieu of which or in exchange for which other Securities have been issued, or which have been paid. -6- I I. I I I I I I I tI I I I I I I Ie I II I Section 4.06. Mutilated, Destroyed, Lost or Stolen Securi- ties. The Issuer hereby instructs the Bank, subject to the provisions of Section 28 of the Bond Resolution, to deliver and issue Securities in exchange for or in lieu of mutilated, destroyed, lost, or stolen Securities as long as the same does not result in an overissuance. In case any Security shall be mutilated, or destroyed, lost or stolen, the Bank, in its discretion, may execute and deliver a replacement Security of like form and tenor, and in the same denomination and bearing a number not contemporaneously outstanding, in exchange and substitution for such mutilated Security, or in lieu of and in substitution for such destroyed lost or stolen Security, only upon the approval of the Issuer _ and after (i) the f i 1 ing by the Ho lder thereof with the Bank of evidence satisfactory to the Bank of the destruction, loss or theft of such Security, and of the authentici ty of the ownership thereof and (i i) the furnishing to the Bank of indemnification in an amount satisfactory to hold the Issuer and the Bank harmless. All expenses and charges associated with such indemnity and with the preparation, execution and delivery of a replacement Security shall be borne by the Holder of the Security mutilated, or destroyed, lost or stolen. Section 4.07. Transaction Information to Issuer. The Bank will, within a reasonable time after receipt of written request from the Issuer, furnish the Issuer information- as to the Securities it has paid pursuant to Section 3.01, Securities it has delivered upon the transfer or exchange of any Securities pursuant to Section 4.01, and Securities it has delivered in exchange for or in lieu of mutilated, destroyed, lost, or stolen Securities pursuant to Section 4.06. ARTICLE FIVE THE BANK Section 5.01. Duties of Bank. The Bank undertakes to perform the duties set forth herein and agrees to use reasonable care in the performance thereof. Section 5.02. Reliance on Documents, Etc. (a) The Bank may conclusively rely, as to the truth of the statements and correctness of the opinions expressed therein, on certificates or opinions furnished to the Bank. -7- I I. I I I I I I I " I I I I I I '- I I (b) The Bank shall not be liable for any error of judgment made in good faith by a Responsible Officer, unless it shall be proved that the Bank was negligent in ascertaining the pertinent facts. (c) No provisions of this Agreement shall require the Bank to .expend or risk its own funds or otherwise incur any financial liability for performance of any of its duties hereunder, or in the exercise of any of its rights or powers, if it shall have reasonable grounds for believing that repayment of such funds or adequate indemnity satisfactory to it against such risks or liability is not assured to it. (d) The Bank may rely and shall be protected in acting or ref raining f rom act ing upon any reso lut ion, cert i fica te, statement, instrument, opinion, report, notice, request, direction, consent, order, bond, note, security, or other paper or document believed by it to be genuine and to have been signed or presented by the proper party or parties. without limiting the generality of the foregoing statement, the Bank need not examine the ownership of any Securities, but is protected in acting upon receipt of Securi ties containing an endorsement or instruction of transfer or power of transfer which appears on its face to be signed by the Holder or an agent of the Holder. The Bank shall not be bound to make any investigation into the facts or matters stated in a resolution, certificate, statement, instrument, opinion, report, notice, request, direction, consent, order, bond, note, security, or other paper or document supplied by Issuer. (e) The Bank may consult with counsel, and the written. advice of such counselor any opinion of counsel shall be full and complete authorization and protection wi th respect to any action taken, suffered, or omitted by it hereunder in good faith and in reliance thereon. (f) The Bank may exercise any of the powers hereunder and perform any duties hereunder either directly or by or through agents or attorneys of the Bank. Section 5.03. Recitals of Issuer. The reci tals contained herein wi th respect to the Issuer and in the Securities shall be taken as the statements of the Issuer, and the Bank assumes no responsiblity for their correctness. -8- I I. I I I I I I I lit I I I I I I I. I I The Bank shall in no event be liable to the Issuer, any Holder or Holders of any Security, or any other Person for any amount due on any Security from its own funds. Section 5.04. May Hold Securities. The Bank, in its individual or any other capacity, may become the owner or pledgee of Securi ties and may otherwise deal with the Issuer with the same rights it would have if it were not the Paying Agent/Registrar, or any other agent. Section 5.05. Moneys Held by Bank. Money held by the Bank hereunder need not be segregated from any other funds provided appropriate trust accounts are maintained in the name and for the benefit of the Issuer. The Bank shall be under no liability for interest on any money received by it hereunder. Any money deposited with the Bank for the payment of the principal, premium (if any), or interest on any Security and remaining unclaimed for four years after final maturity of the Security has become due and payable will be paid by the Bank to the Issuer, and the Holder of such Security shall thereafter look only to the Issuer for payment thereof, and all liability of the Bank with respect to such moneys shall thereupon cease. Section 5.06. Indemnification. The Issuer agrees to indemnify the Bank for, and hold it- harmless against, any loss, liability, or expense incurred without negligence or bad faith on its part, arising out of or in connection with its acceptance or administration of its duties hereunder, including the cost and expense against any claim or liability in connection with the exercise or performance of any of its powers or duties under this Agreement. Section 5.07. Interpleader. The Issuer and the Bank agree that the Bank may seek adjudication of any adverse claim, demand, or controversy over its person as well as funds on deposit, in either a Federal or State District Court located in the State and County where either the Bank Office or the administrative offices of the Issuer is located, and agree that service of process by cert i f ied 0 r reg i s tered ma iI, return rece i pt reques ted, to the address referred to in Section 6.03 of this Agreement shall consti tute adequate service. The Issuer and the Bank further -9- I I. I I I I I I I tI I I I I I I '- I I agree that the Bank Interpleader in any determine the rights herein. has the right to file a Bill of court of competent jurisdiction to of any Person claiming any interest Section 5.08. DT Services. It is hereby represented and warranted that, in the event the Securities are otherwise qualified and accepted for "Depos i tory Trust Company" services 0 r equi va lent depos i to ry trust services by other organizations, Bank has the capability and, to the extent within its control, will comply with the "Operational Arrangements", effective August 1, 1987, which establishes requirements for securities to be eligible for such type depository trust services, including, but not limited to, requirements for the timeliness of payments and funds availability, .transfer turnaround time, and notification of redemptions and calls. ARTICLE SIX MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Section 6.01. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by an agreement in writing signed by both of the parties hereto. Section 6.02. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by either party without the prior written consent of the other. Section 6.03. Notices. Any request, demand, authorization, direction, notice, consent, waiver, or other document provided or permitted hereby to be given or furnished to the Issuer or the Bank shall be mailed or delivered to the Issuer or the Bank, respectively, at the addresses shown on page 12. Section 6.04. Effect of Headings. The Article and Section headings herein are for convenience only and shall not affect the construction hereof. Section 6.05. Successors and Assigns. All covenants and agreements herein by the Issuer shall bind its successors and assigns, whether so expressed or not. -10- I I. I I I I I I I lit I I I I I I -. I I Section 6.06. Severability. In case any provision herein shall be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions sha 11 not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. Section 6.07. Benefits of Agreement. Nothing herein, express or implied, shall give to any Person, other than the parties hereto and their successors hereunder, any benefit or any legal or equitable right, remedy, or claim hereunder. Section 6.08. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the Bond Resolution constitute the entire agreement between the parties hereto relative to the Bank acting as Paying Agent/Registrar and if any conflict exists between this Agreement and the Bond Resolution, the Bond Resolution shall govern. Section 6.09. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same Agreement. Section ,6.10. Termination. This Agreement will terminate (i) on the date of fina,l- payment of the principal of and interest on the Securities to the Holders thereof or (ii) may be earlier terminated by either party upon sixty (60) days written notice; provided, however, an early termination of this Agreement by either party shall not be effective until (a) a successor Paying Agent/Registrar has been appointed by the Issuer and such appointment accepted and (b) notice given to the Holders of the Securities of the appointment of a successor Paying Agent/Registrar. Furthermore, the Bank and Issuer mutually agree that the effective date of an early termination of this Agreement shall not occur at any time which would disrupt, delay or otherwise adversely affect the payment of the Securities. Upon an early termination of this Agreement, the Bank agrees to promptly transfer and deliver the Security Register (or a copy thereof), together with other pertinent books and records relating to the Securi ties, to the successor Paying Agent/Registrar designated and appointed by the Issuer. -11- 1- ' I. I I I I I I 1 -- I I 1 1 1 1 Ie 1 1 The provisions of Section 1.02 and of Article Five shall survive and remain in full force and effect following the termination of this Agreement. Section 6.11. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance wi th and governed by the laws of the State of Texas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. TEXAS AMERICAN BANK/FORT WORTH, N.A., Fort Worth, Texas BY Title: [SEAL] Attest: Address: 500 Throckmorton Fort Worth, Texas 76113 Title: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,TEXAS BY Mayor (CITY SEAL) Attest: Address: P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 City Secretary 4435C -12- I. I Department: Public Works/Utilities ~Ubject: Contract for Laboratory Services With the Trinity I River Authority CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date: 9/12/88 Agenda Number: GN 88-74 This is the standard contract that we sign each year with the Trinity River Authority for the purpose of laboratory testing of sewer samples, water samples, etc. This contract is effective October 1, 1988 through September 31, 1989. The proposed fees are the same as for the current contract except for minor changes. The funding source for this testing is in the utility operating budget for 1988-89. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of this contract with the Trinity River Authority for laboratory testing services. I I .e I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Othe Finance Review Acct. Number 02-11-02-4927 ds Available , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Paae 1 of 1 I I_ I I I I I I I 1_ I I I I I I I Ie L ~ CONTRACT FOR SERVICES I. CONTRACTING PARTIES North Richland The Receivinq Agency: City of Hills , whose authorized address is 7301 N.E. Loop 820, P. O. Box 18609, North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 The Performing Agency: Trinity River.Authority of Texas, wh~se authorized address is 5300 South Co111ns, P. O. Box 240, Arl1ngton, Texas 76010, Attention: Danny F. Vance, General Manager (or his designated representative). II. STATEMENT OF SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED In order to discharge the responsibilities associated with the enforcement of Federal, State, and City regulations. the Receiving Agency requires services of a laboratory qualified to perform water and wastewater analysis, and of personnel to conduct industrial inspection and/or samRling services, such services detailed in Section A, Subsection(s) 1, 2, & 3 , below. A. PERFOR~~NCE OF SERVICES 1. Industrial Inspection Services In keeping with the foregoing, the Receiving Agency employs the Performing Agency and the Performing Agéncy agrees to perform industrial inspection services within the parameters listed on the attached schedule sheet. The Performing Agency (Trinity River Authority of Texas) shall perform all Industrial Pretreatment Inspections, review permit applications and prepare for submittal Permits to OischarQe Industrial Wastes to the Sanitary Sewer in accordance with procedures established by the Trinity River Authority of Texas in accordance with 40 eFR Part 403.8. Industrial Pretreatment Inspections, Application reviews and Permit preparations and submittals shall be in compliance with the Receiving Agency's Industrial Waste Ordinances. Sewer Ordinances Numbers 1063 & 381 ,and EPA General Pretreatment Regulations for Existing and New Sources. Records of Inspections, Applications and Permits shall be maintained as required by EPA General Pretreatment Regulations, 40 CFR Part 403. 12. 2. Industrial Sampling Services In keeping with the foregoing, the Receiving Agency employs the Performing Agency and the Performing Agency agrees to perform industrial sampling services within the parameters listed on the attached schedule sheet and in accordance with the Receiving Agency's Industrial Waste Ordinances and Sewer Ordinances Numbers 1063 & 381 . The Performing Agency (Trinity River Authority of Texas) shall perform all sample collections. sample preservation, and maintenance of chain-of-custody records in accordance to the app~ov~d procedures set forth in Test Methods for Evaluating Sol,d Waste. EPA Manual SW-846, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA Manual EPA-600/4-79-020, and the Handbook for Sampling and Sample Preservation of Water and \~astewater, EPA Manual EPA-600/4-82-029. The samples shall be properly collected, preserved and delivered by the Performing Agency to the Performing Agency's laboratory located at 6500 West Singleton Blvd., Grand Prairie, Texas. When feasible flow or time composited sampling will be conducted. When composited sampling is not feasible, grab sampling will be appropriate. I 3. Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie L --- Analytical Services In keeping with the foregoing, the Receiving Agency employs the Performing Agency and the Performing Agency agrees to perform analytical services within the parameters listed on the attached schedule sheet. The Receiving Agency estimates an average of samples per month will be collected and delivered to the laboratory for analysis. It is understood that these samples will be properly collected and preserved in accordance with applicable sections of A Practical Guide to Water Quality Studies of Streams, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration publication and Methods for Chemical Analysis for Water and ~Jastes, EPA manual, as well as the latest edition of Standard ÑëthÕds for the Examination of Hater and \~astewater. A chain- of-custody procedure shall be maintained in the field and the laboratory in accordance with procedures to be established by the Receiving Agency. The Receiving Agency will furnish chain- of-custody tags. The Performing Agency (Trinity River Authority of Texas) will perform all analyses according to the approved procedures set forth in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Uastewater, current edition or the latest edition of Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA manual. Samples will be analyzed by these methods on the production basis, to include appropriate analytical quality assurance procedures. Records will be kept for documentation of the Performing Agency's quality assurance program and copies will be available to the Receiving Agency upon request. Unusual interferences and problems will be reported to the Receiving Agency at its authorized address noted above. Research ~nto specific techniques to overcome these difficulties will ~e undertaken when practical, and by mutual agreement. The sample information sheet submitted with each sample will designate the particular analysis or analyses to be made of each sample submitted. The laboratories will be operated in such a manner as to insure the legal sufficiency of the sample handling; analytical and reporting procedures: and to remedy effects in the procedures should such be discovered. The various laboratory personnel shall be directed upon receipt of written notice from the Receiving Agency 72 hours in advance, to appear and testify in enforcement actions. In such event, travel and per diem expenses for such employees shall be paid by the Receiving Agency. Travel and per diem for court appearances hereunder shall be based on current State laws. Receiving Agency may deliver to Performing Agency samples for analysis separate and apart from those samples collected by the Performing Agency. When the Receiving Agency delivers samples to the Performing Agency for analysis, the Receiving Agency shall indicate the nature and extent of the analyses it desires to be conducted. Performing Agency shall not be responsible for the manner of collection or chain-of-custody tags or sheets which are matters entirely outside Performing Agency's control. Performing Agency shall receive, log and perform such analyses of samples in accordance \'lith that part of the chain-of-custody procedures identified as Transfer of Custody and Shipment attached hereto. Samples analyzed to maintain the normal quality assurance program which the Performing Agency pre~ently maintains in its laboratory will be charged to the Receiving Agency at the same rate as submitted samples. I --- B. TERr·} Ir~^ T I ON Ie I I Either party to this Contract may te~inate the,Contract ~y giving the other party thirty (30) days notlce in writlng at the1r authorized address as noted previously. Upon delivery of such notice by either party to the other and before expiration of the thirty (30) day period, the Performing Agency will proceed. . promptly to cancel all existing orders, contracts, and o~l,gat'ons which are chargeable to this Contract. As soon as practlcable after notice of termination is given, the Performing Agency will submit a voucher for work performed under this Contract through its termination. The Receiving Agency will pay the Performing Agency for the work performed less all prior payments. Copies of all completed or partially completed reports, documents. and studies prepared under this Contract will be delivered by the Performing Agency to the Receiving Agency when and if this Contract is terminated prior to the completion of the prescribed work. I I C. AMENDING THE CONTRACT I The parties hereto without invalidating this Contract may alter or amend this Contract upon advance written agreement of both parties to exclude work being performed or to include additional work to be performed and to adjust the consideration to be paid hereunder by virtue of alterations or amencments. I I 11. BAS I S FOR CAlCUlA nrm RE HiBURSABlE COSTS The financial basis for calculating reimbursable costs shall be as stated in Attachment A. I I The expenditures by the Trinity River Authority of Texas of funds paid to it under this Contract shall be subject to such State or Federal audit procedures as may be required by law and by accepted practices of the State or Federal auditor, or both, if requested. The Trinity River Authority of Texas shall be responsible for maintaining books of account that clearly, accurately and currently reflect financial transactions. The financial records must include all documents supporting entries on the account records which substantiate costs. The Trinity River Authority of Texas must keep the records readily available for examination for a period of three (3) years after the close of the last expenditure. Ie I Reimbursement for the inspection, sampling, and/or analytical costs, and cost for any travel and per diem expenses shall not exceed Five Thousand dollars ($ 5,000.00 ) for the period of this Contract. I I V. COr-lTRACT ANOUNT I The total amount of this Contract shall not exceed 'Five Thousand dollars ($ 5,000.00 nor be less than One Hundred dollars ($100.00 ). v. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES I The Performing Agency shall bill the Receiving Agency monthly for services performed. Charges for these services shall be based on the attached cost schedules. I The Receiving Agency shall pay the monthly billings of the Performing Agency within thirty (30) days of their receipt. I Ie VI. TERr.1 OF CONTRACT This Contract is to begin October September 3~, 1989. -!-. 1988 and shall terminate L I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie L Receiving Agency: CITY OF BY: TITLE: DATE: ATTEST: (SEAL) --- Performing Agency: TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TEXAS BY: GENERAL MANAGER DATE: ATTEST: (SEAL) i ¡ . . I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie L ~ CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY PROCEDURES Sample Collection 1. To the maximum extent achievable, as few people as possible should handle a sample. 2. Stream and effluent samples should be obtained using standard field sampling techniques and preservation procedures. 3. Chain-of-Custody tags or sheets should be attached to each sample at the time it is collected. The tag or sheet contains basically laboratory (requested parameters) information; however, certain identifying items including City, City Code, Type Sample, Material Sampled, and Method of Preservation must be completed by the field personnel collecting the sample. In completing the Chain-of-Custody tag or sheet, care should be utilized to insure that all necessary information is correctly and legibly entered onto the form. A black ballpoint with water proof ink should be used at all times. Transfer of Custody and Shipment 1. All samples should be handled by the minimum possible number of persons. 2. All incoming samples shall be received by the custodian, or his alternate, and logged into a record book (log book). Information to be entered into the Log Book shall include the sample nu~ber, date received, source, time(s) sampled, date(s) sampled, and analyses requested. 3. Promptly after logging, the custodian will distribute the sample to an analyst or place the sample in the sample room, which will be locked at all times except when samples are removed or replaced by analysts. 4. The custodian shall ensure that heat-sensitive samples, or other sample materials having unusual physical characteristics, or requiring special handling, are properly stored and maintained. 5. Samples shall be kept in the sample storage security area at all times when not actually being used by analysts, such as during overnight absences. 6. The analysis sheet will be signed and dated by the person performing the tests and retained as a permanent record in the laboratory. 7. Test results shall be sent by the laboratory to the appropriate Receiving Agency control point. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Trinity River Authority of Texas Central Regional Wastewater System TECHNICAL SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE FOR LAB 0 RAT 0 R Y A N A L Y S I S I N D U S T R I A L INS PEe T ION S AND I N D U S T R I A L SAM P L I N G F I seA LYE A R 1 9 8 8 December 1, 1987 through November 30, 1988 P.o. Box 531196 Grand Prairie, Texas 75053 (214) Metro 263-2251 I I ~ HEM I C A L A N A L Y S E S I ,oJ ATE R Alkalinity, Total Alkalinity, Phenolphthalein Bicarbonate Carbonate Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BODS) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (C-BOD5) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (Filtered) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BODZO) Boron Chemical Oxygen Demand Chloride Chromium Hexavalent Conductance, Specific Conductance, Diluted Cyanide Cyanide (Amendable to Chlorination) Fluoride, Dissolved Fluoride, Total Hardness Ignitability (Pensky-Martens Closed Cup) Nitrogen: Ammonia Kjeldahl, Total Nitrate Nitrite Organic I I I I I I Ie I C P / A A MET A L $ 7 .25 E A C H ANALYSES Antimony I Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium I Cobalt S 6 .00 Aluminum I Calcium Magnesium Potassium Silica I Sodium S 12. o 0 Arsenic I Mercury Selenium I I Ie I Copper Iron Lead Manganese Molybdenum Nickel Silver Thallium Uranium Vanadium Zinc E A C H E A C H $ 5.50 Oil and Grease $ 18.50 $ 3.90 pH $ 2.25 $ 4.70 Phenols $ 30.00 $ 4.70 Phosphorus: $ 11.00 Or tho $ 5.50 $ 11.50 Total $ 6.00 $ 13.00 Solids: $ 13.00 Total (TS) $ 3.75 $ 7.00 Total Dissolved (TDS) $ 5.70 $ 8.00 Total Suspended (TSS) $ 5.50 $ 5.50 Volatile Suspended (VSS) After TSS $ 3.00 $ 8.00 Sulfate $ 9.00 $ 2.75 Sulfide $ 4.50 $ 5.00 Total Organic Carbon $ 11.75 $ 23.00 Turbidity $ 2.50 $ 28.00 $ 8.50 SEDIMENT $ 8.00 $ 4.50 Chemical Oxygen Demand $ 17.50 Cyanide $ 26.00 $ 25.00 Nitrogen, Kjeldahl, Total $ 18.00 Oil and Grease $ 19.50 $ 6.00 Phosphorus, Total $ 8.50 $ 15.00 Solids, Total Volatile $ 7.00 $ 5.50 $ 5.50 $ 32.00 P RIO R I T Y POLLUTANT METALS $ 108 . 5 0 TOTAL Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc SAMPLE PREPARATION Sediment and Oils EP Toxicity Leachate '!WC Leachate $ 15.00 S 52.00 $ 28.25 I leAs CHROMATOGRAPHY I P RIO R I T Y POL L UTA N T S Volatiles Base Neutrals Acid Extractables Pesticides/PCB's I o R G A N I C D E T E R M I N A T ION H v d roc arb 0 n / Sol v e n t s I General Hydrocarbon/Solvent Scan (VOA) (One column); *Five or less components; including quantification General Hydrocarbon\Solvent Scan (VOA) (Two column); *Five or less components; including quantification Volatile Organic Constituents (EPA regulated - method 601/602) *Add fifteen dollars ($15) for each extra component scanned and quantified I I I HER B I C IDE S I Chlorinated Phenoxy Acid Herbicides (Confirmed and quantified) S P E C I A LAN A L Y S E S A N A L Y S E S G C / M S ) Quoted Upon Request ( G C $105.00 $160.00 $ 40.00 $115.00 PES TIC IDE S / PCB'S Chlorinated Hydrocarbon~, $ 87.00 Organophosphate Pesticides, and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Sample preparation, extraction, and clean- up per sample) ADD for Chlorinated Hydrocarbon (Confirmation and quantification per sample) ADD for Organosphosphate Pesticide (Confirmation and quantification per sample) ADD for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)- Water (Confirmation and quantification per sample) ADD for PCB - Oil (Confirmation and quantification per sample) T R I HAL 0 MET H A N E S $ 43.00 $ 43.00 $ 43.00 $ 30.00 SAM P L E PRE PAR A T ION Trihalomethanes $ 26.25 ADD for Special Treatment/Per Sample (Sediment, Oil) ADD for Special Treatment/Per Sample (EP Toxicity Leachate) $ 15.00 $ 52.00 leEP TOXICITY Leachate Extraction Procedure Metals: Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium Chromium, Lead, Mercury, Selenium Silver Organics: Endrin; Lindane; Methoxychlor; Toxaphene; 2, 4, D; 2, 4, 5-TP Silvex I $ 52.00 $ 72.25 I M I C ROB I 0 LOG I C A LAN A L Y S E S $245.00 I Chlorophyll "a" Chlorophyll "a" and Pheophytin "all Coliform, Fecal (MF) Coliform, Total (MF) Microscopic General Examination Microtox, Bacterial Bioassay Streptococcus, Fecal (MF) I I I I Ie I $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 6.65 $ 5.25 $ 8.50 $ 36.00 $ 6.75 P RIO R I T Y POL L UTA N T S Cyanides Metals Organics $ 23.00 $108.50 Quote I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I J N D U S T R I ALP R E T REA T MEN T S E R V ICE S I N D U S T R I A L SAM P L I N G I N D U S T R I A L INS PEe T ION Composite Sampling/24 Hours Installation and Removal Grab Sample Pick-up Inspection/On Site $ 65.00 $ 50.00 $ 25.00 - Installation of Automatic Composite Samplers - Grab Sampling - Delivery to IRA Laboratory - Field Testing Available - Sample Preservation - Proper Chain of Custody - Permit Application Review - Chemical Inventory Review - Verification of Application Data - Consultation with Industries on Industrial Pretreatment G ENE R A L S E R V ICE I N FOR MAT ION 1. Effective Date: December 1, 1987, all prices listed are per sample and subject to review. 2. All analyses are nm in accordance with "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater," 16th Edition, 1985 and/or EPA "Manual of Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes," 1983. 3. IRA will add a 10% charge, at the same rate as submitted samples, on the monthly billing to maintain the normal quality assurance program. 4. Sample preparations, if required, are charged additionally as listed. 5. Sample containers, preservatives, and supplies will be provided upon request at a reasonable charge. 6. Samples* should be delivered to the laboratory before 4:30 p.m. on weekdays. Samples cannot be accepted on weekends or holidays unless special arrangements are made in advance. *(Bacteriological samples should be delivered prior to 2:00 p.m. unless special arrangements are made in advance. After-hour samples may be left in cold storage vault with analyses request form.) 7. Average completion time for standard tests is two weeks with the analyses results normally mailed within two days of completion. Billing statements for completed monthly analyses are mailed by the 10th of the following month. 8. Lab~ratory hours are weekdays 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and weekends 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 9. Office hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. For after-hour emergencies, leave message w1th computer operator. FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT Patricia Cleveland Manager, Technical Services Bill Cyrus Laboratory Division Chief Stephen Bainter Pretreatment Coordinator I~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I --- '. Trinity River Authority of Texas Centr~'_~e~~~~~é!' w~~~E!~~t~!~y~te,,-,~ -.----------.----- r :,;' ::'. ! "~:..'~ 'I,'. , ,"." '¿:: .:~ TEe H N I C A L S E R V ICE S F t E ~ C H t D U L E For LAB 0 RAT 0 R Y A N A L Y S E S I N 0 U S T R I A L INS PEe T 1 0 N S AND I N 0 J S T R I A L SAM? L I ~ G ., F I seA lYE A R 1 989 December 1, 1988 th}'ough November 30, 1989 P.O. Box 531196 Grand Prairie, Texas 75053 (214) I\~etro 263-2251 OJ I' leI I N D U S T R I A L PRETREATMENT S E R V ICE S I N D U S T R I A L SAM P L I N G I N D U S T R I A L INS P E C T ION I Composite Sampling/24 Hours Installation and Removal Grab Sample Pick-up $ 50.00 $ 25.00 Inspection/On Site $ 65.00 I - Installation of Automatic Composite Samplers - Grab Sampling - Delivery to IRA Laboratory - Field Testing Available - Sample Preservation - Proper Chain of Custody - Permit Application Review - Chemical Inventory Review - Verification of Application Data - Consultation with Industries on Industrial Pretreatment I GENERAL S E R V ICE I N FOR MAT ION I 1. Effective Date: December 1, 1988, all prices listed are per sample and subject to review. 2. All analyses are nm in accordance with "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater," 16th Edition, 1985 and/or EPA "Manual of Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes," 1983. 3. TRA will add a 10% charge, at the same rate as submitted samples, on the monthly billing to maintain the normal quality assurance program. I 4. Sample preparations, if required, are charged additionally as listed. 5. Sample containers, preservatives, and supplies will be provided upon request at a reasonable charge. Samples* should be delivered to the laboratory before 4:30 p.m. on weekdays. Samples cannot be accepted on weekends or holidays unless special arrangements are made in advance. *(Bacteriological samples should be delivered prior to 2:00 p.m. unless special arrangements are made in advance. After-hour samples may be left in cold storage vault with analyses request form.) I 6. le7. Average completion time for standard tests is two weeks with the analyses results normally mailed within two days of completion. Billing statements for completed monthly analyses are mailed by the 10th of the following month. I 8. Laboratory hours are weekdays 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and weekends 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 9. Office hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. For after-hour emergencies, leave message with computer operator. . , I I FOR M 0 REI N FOR MAT ION , CONTACT I Patricia Cleveland Manager, Technical Services Bill Cyrus Laboratory Division Chief Stephen Bainter Pretreatment Coordinator I I I Ie I I' I eCHEM I C A L ANALYSES I WATER Alkalinity, Total $ 5.50 Oil and Grease $ 19.00 Alkalinity, Phenolphthalein $ 3.90 pH $ 2.25 I Bicarbonate $ 4./0 Phenols $ 30.00 Carbonate $ 4.10 Phosphorus: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BODS) $ 11.25 Ortho $ 5.50 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (C-BOD5) $ 12.00 Total $ 6.50 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (C-BOD20) $ 13.25 Solids: I Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD20) $ 13.25 Total (TS) $ 3.75 Chemical Oxygen Demand $ 8.00 Total Dissolved (TDS) $ 6.00 Chloride $ 5.50 Total Suspended (TSS) $ 5.75 Chromium Hexavalent $ 8.00 Volatile Suspended (VSS) After TSS $ 3.25 I Conductance, Specific $ 2.75 Sulfate $ 9.50 Conductance, Diluted $ 5.00 Sulfide $ 4.75 Cyanide $ 23.00 Total Organic Carbon $ 11.75 Cyanide (Amendable to Chlorination) $ 28.00 Turbidity $ 2.50 Fluoride, Dissolved $ 8.10 I Fluoride, Total $ 7.50 SEDIMENT Hardness $ 5.00 Ignitability Chemical Oxygen Demand $ 19.50 (Pensky-Martens Closed Cup) $ 25.00 Cyanide . $ 26.00 I Nitrogen: Nitrogen, Kjeldahl~ Total $ 18.00 Ammonia $ 6.00 Oil and Grease $ 19.50 Kjeldahl, Total $ 15.00 Phosphorus, Total $ 9.00 Nitrate $ 5.50 Solids, Total Volatile $ 7.00 Nitrite' $ 5.50 I Organic $ 32.00 I C P / A A MET A LAN A L Y S E S __$7.25 Antimony Barium I Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt E A C H Copper Iron Lead Manganese Molybdenum Nickel Silver Thallium Uranium Vanadium Zinc P RIO R I T Y POL L U TA N T $ 108 . SOT 0 TAL METALS E A C H Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead ., Mercury Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc I $ 6 . 0 0 Aluminum Boron I Calcium Magnesium Potassium Silica I Sodium $ 12. o 0 Arsenic I Mercury Selenium I I Ie I SAMPLE PREPARATION Sediment and Oils EP Toxicity Leachate !WC Leachate $ 15.00 $ 55.00 $ 25.00 E A C H , I~. I eGAS I CHROMATOGRAPHY PRIORITY POL L UTA N T S I Volatiles Base Neutrals Acid Extractables Pesticides/PCB's I o R G A N I C D E T E R M I N A T ION H V d roc arb 0 n / Sol v e n t s I General Hydrocarbon/Solvent Scan (VOA) (One column); *Five or less components; including quantification General Hydrocarbon\Solvent Scan (VOA) (Two column); *Five or less components; including quantification Volatile Organic Constituents (EPA regulated - method 601/602) *Add fifteen dollars ($15) for each extra component scanned and quantified I I HER B I C IDE S I Chlorinated Phenoxy Acid Herbicides (Confirmed and quantified) S PEe I A LAN A L Y S E S II4IIÞ E P T 0 X I C I T Y Leachate Extraction Procedure Metals: Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium Chromium, Lead, Mercury, Selenium Silver Organics: Endrin; Lindane; Methoxychlor; Toxaphene; 2, 4, D; 2, 4, 5-TP Silvex I I PES T I ~ IDE S / PCB'S Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, $ 87.00 Organophosphate Pesticides, and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Sample preparation, extraction, and clean~ up per sample) ADD for Chlorinated Hydrocarbon (Confirmation and quantification per sample) ADD for Organosphosphate Pesticide (Confirmation and quantification per sample) ADD for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)- 'Water (Confirmation and quantification per sample) ADD for PCB - Oil (Confirmation and quantification per sample) - '~_...- .. --- ANALYSES G C / M S ) Quoted Upon Request ( G C $105.00 $160.00 $ 40.00 TRIHALOMETHANES $ 43.00 $ 45.00 $ 45.00 $ 30.00 SAMPLE PREPARATION Trihalomethanes $ 28.00 $115.00 ADD for Special Treatment/Per Sample (Sediment, Oil) ADD for Special Treatment/Per Sample (EP Toxicity Leachate) PRIORITY POLLUTANTS $ 55.00 Cyanides Metals Organics -, $ 72.25 $245.00 OJ M I C ROB I 0 LOG I C A LAN A L Y S E S $ 15.00 $ 55.00 $ 23.00 $108.50 Quote I Chlorophyll "a" Chlorophyll "a" and Pheophytin "a" Coliform, Fecal (MF) Coliform, Total (HF) Microscopic General Examination Hicrotox, Bacterial Bioassay Streptococcus, Fecal (MF) Heterotrophic Plate Count I I I I Ie I $ 7.00 $ 7.00 $ 6.65 $ 5.25 $ 8.50 $ 38.00 $ 6.75 $ 6.75 I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance Department: Subject: Operation Support for CIP Project & Impact ~lee Accountlng t;ystem _ Council Meeting Date: 9/12/88 Agenda Number: GN 88-75 The proposed Operational Support for the Project Cost Accounting Module was presented to the CIP Carmittee on 'fuesday, September 6, 1988. This IIDdule will be utilized to account for CIP Projects for the life of the project, proper utilization of bond funds in accordance with Tax Refonn Act of 1986 (including arbitrage), iIrpact fees, and proper allocation of interest incaœ to all projects and iIrpact fees. The Project Accounting Module was designed by Municipal Software Consul tants . The prograrrmers provided user documentation for the IIDdule such as, the use of various IœI1US and system operational support. The reporting for this IIDdule is different fran the no:rmal financial package that the City currently is using. This IIDdule allows the user to create their own project accounting reports based on user defined coding. This is a pü\'ærful tool that is integrated with our General ledger, Accounts Payable, Tax, Utility Billing, and Payroll systems. Operational support is important in order that we marry the system use with the functional documentation of the canputer software. In the course of their iIrpact fee study, Reed-Stowe and Co. has developed iIrpact fee tracking in the Cost Accounting Module. The rrethodology they developed for this aspect of the software needs to be continued for the other utilizations of the job costing. eed-Stowe's proposal for the developnent, documentation, user instruction and training or the IIDdule is $9,000 with the possibility of future rebates of up to $4,500 dependent on the marketability of the documentation to other cities using Municipal Software. The only other proposal was fran Administrative & Fiscal Consul ting Services, Inc. for $15,000. Funding Source: 02-09-88-4200 13-00-30-4800 $4,013 4,987 'Ibtal $9,000 - Recarmendation: The Staff recœmends accepting the proposal fran Reed-Stowe and Co. for $9,000. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number See above Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available . Operating Budget - _ ß """-vr7 Other ~ ~~ rll~ ~ V ~1h~~ I - . Dep;:r£ ent He Signature ~-~anager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director tl ~-: ~ Page 1 of I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: Economic Development eUbject: Approval of Contract with Richard Phelps as II Golf Course Architect 9/12/88 Council Meeting Date: GN 88-76 Agenda Number: Marty Streiff of Recreational Services is suggesting we retain Richard Phelps of Denver, Colorado as our golf course architect. He is highly recommended. Projects that he has done in the Metroplex include: Indian Creek Golf Course Carrollton, Texas 36 hole golf facility Firewheel Golf Park Garland, Texas 36 hole golf facility He has been involved with planning for our course since its inception by Meadow Lakes. RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommends approval of this contract. e Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget e Other{~ . / .l,i. Acct. Number 13-70-88-4200 Sufficient Funds Available (NEW ACCOUNT) RV~ I Ity Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Fmance Director Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 1988, for the design of an 18-hole golf course facility in Tarrant County, Texas, by and between the City of North Richland Hills, hereinafter referred to as Owner and Richard M. Phelps, Ltd., hereinafter referred to as Golf Course Architect or GCA. WIT N E SSE T H WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills intends to develop an 18-hole golf facility in Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the "Projectll: ARTICLE 1 The Golf Course Architect agrees to provide professional services as consultant to the Owner for the Project as hereinafter set forth, as the term Project is defined above, in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. ARTICLE 2 The Owner agrees to pay the Golf Course Architect as compensation for professional services in accordance with the terms and Conditions of this· Agreement as follows: 2.1 For Consultation to ascertain the requirements of the Project there will be no charge. 2.2 For Golf Course Master Development Plan Revisions, not to exceed an amount of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500) based on our standard hourly rate schedule: Principal Time Associate Time Draftsman Time $75.00 per hour $60.00 per hour $25.00 per hour 2.3 For Golf Course Design document preparation for the 18-hole golf course as described in Paragraph 3.3, a lump sum amount of Ninety-eight Thousand Dollars ($98,000.00). 2.4 For the Golf Course Architect's Additional Services and for the services of other professional consultants for the Project, beyond the Basic Services as described in this Agreement, shall be the Owner's responsibility as described in Article 4. . 3.2.2 Fol1ow1ng careful Critique of the 'preHmf,nary design st,Udy, the phn sha11 be 1 nfOrmally staked in the fiel d by Owner,' s £ng1 neers for revi ew by the Owner and team members. II 3.2.3 The product of this review, interpretation, and planning will be a Final Golf Course Master DeveloPment Plan which conveys in detail the lo- II ecation, con,dit1ons. facilities. and uses as well as c1rcuhtfon and environmental I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I ~'" , .,..,.....~.. t e"aF'-" 2.5 The t1mes and conditions of payment shall be as described in Article 6. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT, BEn~EEN OWNER AND GOLF COURSE ARCHITECT ARTICLE 3 BASIC SERVI~ES The Golf Course Architect's Basic Services consist Of the phases described as follows: 3.1 CONSULTATION 3.1.1 The Golf Course Architect shall consult wfth the Owner to ascertain the requirements of the Project. 3.1.2 Due to the complex1ty of the overall development and the inter- disciplinary nature of the various planning and design responsibilities, the Golf Course Architect shall be involved in all phases of the planning effort relative to the location and the layout of the proposed golf COurse facility. Proper conimunicatfon and coordination durfna the Dlannina ,nrocess between the land Developer, Consultants. Owner's Representatives and the Golf Course Archi- tect wl1l insure total functional1ty and highest qualit)" design of the golf facility as well as mainta1n the proper relationship between all of the plan elements of the Project, Host critical of these elements are space allocation. location of property lines. surface drainage. underground utilities. and golf COurse maintenance requlrements. 3.2 MASTER PLAN REVISIONS AND FINAL MASTER PLAN 3.2.1 Preparatory to the phnning process, the Gol f Course Arch1tect will review and evaluate the preliminary plans and data which relate to or affect the proposed golf cour~e site area to thoroughly re-acquaint himself with the site. Included and especially important are reviews of subdiVision plans, site inspections and meetings with the various team members to fully understand and coordinate the elements of the project. Additiona1study will also be made of ground Slopes, soils. drainage character1stics, vegetation. and all of the special relationShips which require careful consideration in the planning of a golf facility. Aerial photographs. topographic maps, soil tests and reports. natural landforms. Wa ter courses and f1 ow patterns. and adjacent land uses will be studied as important elements of the design process. . ·2.. · I J.) ~ ',- '"' J. ~ , .J. I ~ ~ I' I · e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I e ments I I ' I t..L I~U. ..;V.;; u (~ LOOU ~ep (,öö l~:j~ NO.UUl ~.U4 features and graphically fndicates all of the amenities of and strategy for the golf Courses and the practice/teaching area. 3.3 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PREPARATION 3.1.1 The Gol f Course Archf tect, shall prepare from previously approved Design Documents. for approval by the Owner', Working Drawings and Construction Specifications for the 18·hole golf faCflity, setting forth in detail the requirements for construction of the Project to include: 3.3.1.1 Control Traverse Plan in preliminary form, for the golf facility to indicate permanent engineering control and reference points for all phases of golf Course construction. We would require that the actual traverse pofnts be computed and staked in the field prior to the detailed design document preparation phase by the OWner's and Land Developer's engineers. 3.3.1.2 Site Grading Plan to indicate where quantities of earth must be cut or f111eCllJfor putting green locations. for tee locations. for sand trap and mound sites. for bunkers, for water storage reservoirs. for proper fairway slopes, and for overall site drainage. ' . 3.3.1.3 Design of Details to indicate the design character for each of the putting greens, for all tees, and for all hazards. These details. designed to a 0.5' contour interval with all spot elevations to the nearest 0.1'. assure proper size, shape, viSibility, contour, artistic value. and drainage characteristics for both plaYing and maintenance requirements. 3.3.1.4 Pond Design for golf strategy and aesthetics but more importantly ~ receive and store water for use in the irrigation system. While the Golf Course Architect· will be responsible for the conceptual design of ponds and dra1nageways nor~ally associated with a golf Course. the Owner or Developer will be respon~ibl~ for bridge design, high and low water flow crossings, weirs, inlets and outlets, Spillways and any other structures or devices required as a part of or as a result of flood control or water storage. 3.3.1.5 Spr1g9in~/Seeding{SOddin9 Plan to indicate the areas to be sprigged. seeded. Dr sodded and the specif1é types of Sprigs. seed, Or sod to be used including ornamental grasses to provide aesthetic beauty, interest. and strategic golf challenge through careful placement for hazard value. This wi11 be done in close coordination and consultation with the Owner. 3.3.1.6 Land~caÞe Plan to represent the proper placement of plant material on and adjacent to the 901f Course for aesthetic and strategic value. General suggestions of types will be given. not speciffc types or s1zes. 3.3.1.7 Irri~atfon Plan and Details including the Pump Station and controls as required for tfie most effectfve andeconomical method of providing water to the golf Course. As staked and as·built drawings shall also be provided. 3.3.1.8 Construction S~ecff1catfons consisting of written docu~ to clearly state the requlred materials and the standards of 'oostructfon ..3. I - I expected of a contractor and/or construction personnal for every e1ement of _ the g01 f course construction process. I 3.3.1.9 Ob.servation to visit the site twelve (12) tiRJeS during the construction per10d at~cr;t1cal times during the process as well as at the re- quest of the Owner and the Golf Course Contractor to observe the work 1n progress and to report on the quality and the quantity of workmanship ;n accordance with II the construction documents. Possible trips might include: I I I I I I_ I I I I I I . 3.4.1, The Go1f Course Architect, following the Ownerls approval of the Construction Documents. shall assist the Owner 1n obtaining bids for golf course construction for an l8-hole course to include the preparation of Invitation to Bid Instructions to Bidders. Special Conditions and other necessary legal documentatio~ I In addition! the Golf Course Architect shall be prepared to clarify questions by · addenda durlng the bidding period. conduct a site inspection with Bidders prior to I ~ the bid opening, analyze the bids received and recommend award of the contract. ~ Coordination with standard documents of the Owner will be essential. I Clearing Stake-Out to assure that no more of the existing trees and grasses are d{sturbed than àbsolute1y necessary to provide rough area and to reduce as much as practicable the 11kelihood of any unnecessary clearing. Rough Gradl~~ to make certain that the contractor ~nderstand$ the grad- 1ng and eart moving concept. to inspect the excavation and placement of earth to insure that it is in str1ct accordance with the design docu- ments, to protect against unnecessary movement of material and site dis- turbance. and to insure that the drainage COurses ðre properly constructed. Finish Grading to observe the fine grading operations on tees for proper surface ~rade and slope trans1~ion; on fairways for proper ro'l. pitch. mounding. and sight-distance as we11 as for positive dra1nage¡ on sand trap5 and bunkers for s;ght-distance. shðpe. drainage, and playab11;ty; on water features for v1s1bility and slope; on putting green areas for proper shot-making feature. and for drainage; and in all disturbed rough areas to assure the proper transitional blending of fairway to those areas. Irrigation Mains. laterals and Head locations as well as pump station con- struct~on to '1nsure exact locatiöns. coverage. control and construction complfance. The proper design and construction of this system is criti. cal as it ;s the heart of the entire golf course. S~r19ging/Seedin9/Soddin~ to obser~e both the fertilizðtion application operation anathe sprigglng/seeding/sodding operation for strict cornpl1.. ance with the design concept and the construction documents. Sð,nd Trdp Cutt1~/Sha'p1~ to physically 'out1i ne the area for sand place- ment to assure s ght-distance. proper shape for both slope and phyabl1ity. and artistic effect for overall aesthetic attractiveness. ~~~l Inseect10n for Owner Acce~tance to walk the entire project work area and to carefu'ly inspect t e total facility before releasing the contractor from further responsibility. 3.4 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT BIDDING PHASE -4- IPDQ. PRINTING Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I,e I . ',. ::...,*::, . -- '. ..~.~~~~:'~ . :.::~:~.< \:~~~<~. . . . :.:'. ........ . . . '. ~~&~~.~ ;.: .' . . . TEL NO.303-674-2860 Sep 7,8$ 13:38 No.OOl P.06 ARTICLE 4 . ADDITIONAL SERVICES 4.1 1f any of the following edd1t1onal services are authori%cd in writ- t1ng by the Owner. they $h¿¡l1 .be paid for b,y the Owner as ·herein provfded. 4.1.1 Prov1d1ng services to investigate eXisting conditions or f¿¡ci11t ies 'or to' make measured drAwi ngs thereof Dr to veri fy the aCCurAcy 0 f drawings or other 1nfo~at1on'furnished by the Owner. 4.1.2 'Preparing documents' for alternate bids or out-of-sequence services reque$ted b¥'the Ow~er. 4.1.3 Hiking revfsions to previously approved Drawings. Specifica- tions. or other documents to accompl15h changes not inithted by the Golf Course Architect. ' II 4.1.4 Provfdfng çonsultat10n concerning replacement of any Work damaged during construction end furnishing profe$Sional services of the type set forth in Paragr,ph 3.3 is may be required in connect1on with the rep1ace- 'Rent of such work. I 4.1.5 Providing prQfessiona1 services made necessary by the default of Any Contractor of any major defects in the Work of any Contractor in the perfonmance of a,C~n$truction Contract. 4.1.6 Providing extènsfve ð$$istance in the ut1112atfon of any equfp- ment or system such as initial start·up or testing. adjusting and balancing. preparation of operation and maintenance manuals. training personnel for oper- . ation and maintenance. and cQnsultation during operation. . . 4.1.7 Providing Sérvices after final payment to a Contractor. 4.1.8 Prepar1~g to serve or serving as an expert witness in connec. t10n with any public hearing arbitration proceeding. legal proceeding. or in the proCeedings of _. court of recor.d. . ARTICLE 5 - OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 The Owner shall prQvide full information regarding the requirements for the ProJect. . 5.2 The Owner shall des;gnate a representative to act in h1s behalf with respect to the P~ject. The representAtfve $hall examine Documents Su~nftted ~ the Golf Course Architect and shall render decisions. pertaining thereto promptly to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of the Golf Course Arch1. teet's work. . -5- I I · e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I II Ie I 5.3 The Golf Course Archfte.ct shall be furnished a certified land survey of the site, one (1) half-tone mylar reproducible copy required, giving as appli- cable grades·and Hnes of streets, highways, pavements and encroachments; deed restr1ctions~ boundaries. topographi"c contout"s of the site at a 2' . 0" interval¡ locations, dimensions, and complete data pertaining to existing buildings, pro- perty corners, and other improvements; and full information concerning available services and utiTity lines, both pUblic and private. above and below grade, in- cluding inverts and depths with complet. easement informðt10n. (ScaTe to be 1 It II 1 00' · 0 II ) . 5.4 The Owner shan furnish the servfces of other professional consultants when such services are deemed necessary by the Golf Course Architect. 5.5 The Owner sha" furnish any laboratory tests, inspections, and reports as required by law or the Contract Docun~nts. 5.6· The Owner shall furnish such legal. accounting. and insurance counsel- ing services as may be necessary for. the Project and such aUditing·services as he may require to ascertain how or for what purposes any Contractor has used monies paid to him under thè Construction Contract. 5.7 The services. informat1on, surveys. and t"eports required by Paragraphs 5.3 through 5.6 incTuslve shall be furnished at the Owner's expense and the Golf Course Architect shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness thereof. 5.8 If the Owner observes Or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or de- fect in the Project of non-conformance with the Contract Documents. he Shðll give prompt written notice thereof to the Golf Course Architect. 5.9 The Owner shaTl furnish information required of him as expeditiously as necessary for the orderly -progress of the Work. .. ARTICLE f) - PAYMENTS TO THE GOLF COURSE ARCHITECT 6.1 Payments on ðccount Of the Golf Course Architect's professional fee for Basic Services shall be made is follows: 6.1.1 The Golf Course Architect will' invoice the Owner on or about the first of each month for compTetlon of Basic Services performed during the previous month. All invoices. inCluding final. sha11 be for actual services perfoMmed toward the completion of the eTements of this Agreement. 6.1.1.1 Basic Compensation total for Basic Ser~1ces shall be Ninety Eight Thousand Dollars ($98,000) plus the amount expended on the Master Development Plan. . -". -.... ... i:.:/ . -6- , .,~. . ~ .. . \ I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I · -... .,.... I ~v'V V 1"+ ¿'OUU ~ep 1,88 13:38 No.OOl PI08 6.1.2 Poyments for Addftional Services of the Golf Course ArChitect. as defined in Article 4 shall be made monthly upon presentation Qf the Golf Course Arch1tect's st~tem.nt of Serv1ces rendered. '6.1.3' Payments for Reimbursable Expenses as defined in Artfcle 7 herein shall be made monthly upon preSentation of the Golf Course,ArCh1tect's statement qf ser~1çes. rendered. . .. 6.2 Accounts' w111 be payable within thirty (30) days of the date of billing. Unpaid ICCounts shall bear a Carrying charge from the date of bil. ling at the rate of one and one-half percent (1~~) per month on the unpaid ba 1 ance. 6.3 No deductions sha11 be made from the Golf Course ArChitect's Com.. pensatfon On account of penalty, liquidated damages. 'or other Sums withheld from pa,yments to ,.11\1 Contractor, 6.4 It the PrOject fs Suspended for more than three (3) months or aban- doned fn Whole or in part. the Golf Course Archftect shall be paid his compen- sation for services perfonDed plus reimbursable expenses prior to receipt of written noUce from the Owner of such suSpension of abandonment together with ·111 tenminal expenses resulting from such suspension or abandonment of the Work. If the Project is resumed after befng Suspended for more than three (3) months. the Golf Course Architect's compensation shall be SubJect to renego~ t1atton. . ARTICLE 7 I _ REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES . . 7.1 Reimbursable EXpense's Ire fn additfon to compensation for BaSic Ser- vices and Additional Servlc~s ltsted-r~rein añd 1ñctude actual expenditures made by the Golf Course ArChitect in the interest of the Project for the inci- dental expenses lf$ted below. . 7.1.1 Expenses Of transporta~fon and living when traveling in con- nection wfth the Project. Mileage for autoMobile transportation shall be Com- puted on the basf, of $.25/mile. , 7.1.2 Expense of long distance telephone calls. teleg~amst mait. air freight. prfntfn9 services. and supp11es used fn the work effort, 7.1.3 EXpen~e$ wil1 be billed It ð flat rate of actual cost and wfl1 be support by actual receipts or cOpies thereof. 7.1.4 Any trips relat1ve to this Project which are combined with trips relative to any other projects in the area will be pro-rated. the cost for which wfll be shlred proportionate1y by other projects. -7. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ARTICLE 8 GOLF COURSE ARCHITECT IS ACCOUNTING RECORDS Records of the Golf Course Architect·s Additional Services and Reimbursable Expenses applicable to the Project shall be kept on a recognized accounting basis acceptable to the Owner and shall be available to the Owner at mutually convenient times. ARTICLE 9 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS Drawings, Construction Specifications, and other Contract Documents as instruments of service are and shall remain the property of the Golf Course Architect whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not. They are not to be used on any other project or for extensions of this Project except by agreement in writing and with appropriate compensation to the Golf Course Architect. ARTICLE 10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS The Owners and the Golf Course Architect each binds himself, his partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Neither the Owner nor the Golf Course Architect shall assign, sublet or transfer his interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. ARTICLE 11 EXTENT OF AGREEMENT This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Owners and the Golf Course Architect and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the owner and the Golf Course Architect. ARTICLE 12 GOVERNING LAW Unless otherwise specified, this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the United States and the State of Texas. -8- I \ C . .. I · e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I, , .. .. -. . . -..- I........ .'t...... ~v~ V I ""t ¿'OVV l~:~~ NO.UUl ~.lü ~t;f-J ( ,ö<:S · ARTICLE 13 - 1 TERMINATION This 'Agreement may be terminated by either party upon tèn (10) days' written notice $hould either party fail to Substantially perform in,accord- ance with the tenns of this Agreement through no fault Of the other. At the time of such ~erm1nat1on. the Golf Course Architect shall be paid for a11 Balic ServIces, Additional Services. and Reimbursable Expenses performed to the te~fnatfo" date inCludfng $uçh sums as may accrue subsequent to and as part of the termfnatfon procedure. ARTJCL£ 14 COPIES OF DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS The GOlf Course Architect shall provide one (1) reproducible set' of the Ðrawings and Specifications in con$iderat1on of his fee for Basic Services. Addit10nal copies wfll be provided b¥ the Golf Course Architect to the Owner at ~he cost of reproduction. ARTICLE 15 -w . . ARBITRATION A1l c1afms disputes and other matters in questfon arising out Of, or relating to, this Agreement or the breach thereof. sh411 be decided by ar- bitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules ' of the American Arbitration Assoc1ation then in effect unless the parties mutaul1y agree otherwise. Notice of the demand shall be made within a reasonab1e time after the claim. dispute or other matter in question has arisen. ,In no event s~al) the demand ~r arbitration be made after the date when fnst1t~tion of leg~l or equftable proceedings based on such claim. dis- pute or other matter in questionwou1d be barred by the applicable statute of limitations. · The award rendered by the arbitrators shall be final. and Judgement may be entered upon it fn OCCordance with applicable law in an¥ court having ~urf~dfctfon thereof. , . . .g. , lilt . .~~>. . . I PDQ ~RIÑTING I . e I I I I I I I I e 81: !I I II I I I I _ Titl., _ I I . . . TEL No.303-674-2860 ,.. Sep 7,88 13:38 No.OOl P.l1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed th1s Agreement the day, month. and ¥ear below wr1tten. OWNER T1 t 1 e : Da te : u Attes t; -4 Tftle: Date: GOLF COURSE ARCHITECT ~ I t J ~ R1chard M. Phe1ps, Ltd. · Golf Course Architect 81: Do te I ......-r 7 ·-~-1-.·"" ; '~";",,,;;.,.;,;"':"..'._-. .".:....._._'..~....'. I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: Public Works ~Ubject: Endorsement of the Texas Good Roads Amendment, II Resolution No. 88-31 Council Meeting Date: 9/12/88 Agenda Number: GN 88-77 I The Regional Transportation Council (RTC) for the Dallas/Fort Worth Metropolitan Area is requesting all local governments to formally express support for the Texas Good Roads Amendment. This proposed State constitutional amendment will be considered on the ballot by voters in the forthcoming November general election. I The attached transmittal letter from RTC, the proposed resolution, and the statement by the State Highway & Public Transportation Commission further clarify the reasons for the endorsement request. II II I II Recommendation: lie The staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 88-31. I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget -~ Finance Review Acct. Number N/ A Sufficient Funds Available JJ¡)- ~ - RØlr/~ I City Manager , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Paae 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I 'I I I I I Ie I / RESOLUTION NO. 88-31 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas is concerned about regional transportation improvements in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metropolitan Area; and WHEREAS, Texas motorists pay a federal motor fuel tax of nine cents per gallon, the revenue from which is placed in the federal Highway Trust Fund that is dedicated by federal law for reimbursing the states for expenditures on federal aid highways; and WHEREAS, Texas annually receives approximately $800 million from the federal Highway Trust Fund, which accounts for at least half of the highway construction funding in Texas; and WHEREAS, since 1917 Texas has used all such federal funds for highway improvement purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of North Richland Hills, Texas supports the proposed Texas Good Roads Amendment to the Texas Constitution being considered in the November 1988 General Election as stated below: IIAll revenues received from the federal government as reimbursement for State expenditures of funds that are themselves dedicated for acquiring right-of-way and constructing, maintaining, and policing public· roadways are also constitutionally dedicated and shall be used only for those purposes. II PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of September, 1988. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .. :P"' =:=œ II" 5iiI ~ Regional Transportation Council R O. Box 5888 · Arlington, Texas 76005-5888 . ( FROM: Gordon A. Shunk DATE: August 5, 1988 Director of Transportation and Energy TO: Mayors of Comnuni ties in the Dallas-Fort Worth Urbanized Area SllBJEcr: Texas Gocrl Roads Amendment The Texas Gocrl Roads and Transportation Association ( 'IœTA) has long been one of the strongest supporters of the Texas highway program. The 'IœTA is asking local governments and other groups interested in transportation to formally eXpress support for the so-called Texas Gocxi Roads Amendment. This proposed constitutional amendment to protect federal notor fuel tax revenues for highway uses in Texas will be considered on the ballot in the November general election. The amendment would forbid using federal motor fuel tax revenues for any purpose other than wilding and naintaining highways. Currently in Austin there are suggestions that federal rrotor fuel tax funds returned to Texas might be better spent on projects other than highways. The eight cent federal rrotor fuel tax returns to Texas al::cut $800 million annually. Revenues from the state notor fuel tax are already protected by the state Constitution from use for nonhighway purposes, except for education. Enclosed is a copy of the resolution passed by the Regional Transportation Council at its meeting on June 7, 1988. Several cities have passed resolutions of support for the amendment, and others are expected to do so. Should your city choose to support the Texas Gocxi Roads Amendment, please send copies of your resolution to me and to the Texas Gocrl Roads and Transportation Association, 400 West 15th, Suite 417, Austin, Texas 78701. vpj r Enclosure cc: 'IœTA The Transportation Policy Body for the North Central Texas Council of Governments (Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Dallas-Fort Worth Region) I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .. .... '" RESOLUTI Ol-1 BY THE REGIONAL TRM~SPORTATION COUNCIL FOR THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH t1ErROPOLITMl AREA SUPPORTING THE TEXAS GOOD ROADS AMENDMENT WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Councit is the designated ~1etropolitan Planning Organization charged with responsibility for coordinating regional transportation ilnprovements in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metropolitan Area; and WHEREAS, Texas motorists pay a federal motor fuel tax of nine cents per gallon, the revenue fram which is placed in the federal Highway Trust Fund that is dedicated by federal law for rellribursing the states for expenditures on federal aid highways; and \VHEREAS, Texas annually receives approximately $800 million from the federal Highway Trust Fund, which accounts for at least half of the highway construction funding in Texas; and WHEREAS, since 1917 Texas has used all such federal funds for highway bnprovernent purposes, t~OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the REGIONAL TRANSPORrATION COOt~IL supports the proposed Texas Good Roads Amendment to the Texas Constitution being considered in the November 1988 General Election as stated below: "All revenues recei ve1 fran the federal government as rellribursanent for state expenditures of funds that are themselves dedicated for acquiring rights-of way arrl constructirg, maintaining, arrl policing public roadways are also constitutionally dedicated and shall be used only for those purposes." I hereby certify that this resolution was dopted by the Regional Transportation Council for the Dallas-Fort rth l'1etropoli tan Area on June 7,'. 1988. illiam Garrlson, Secretary Regional Transportation Council Counci~ember, City of Fort Worth Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I ". le~~ _ ~ John R. B tler. Jr., ~ber ~. ...... p; ~ >4i' . .' '," .)./.." I " ,'~'" ~ ' . ,·.rY ..... ," ~,,'" 4 I TEXAS STATE HIGHWAY & PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Statement on Constitutional Amendment Senate Joint Resolution 8 Second Called Session, 70th legisl.ature liThe Constitutional amendment and/or clarification providing that the federal reimbursements of state highway dedicated funds are themselves dedicated for the purpose of acquiring rights-of-way and constructing, maintaining, and policing public roadways. II As stewards of Texasl-surface transportation system, members of the State Highway and Public Transportation Commission support passage of the constitu- tional amendment which specifies that federal reimbursements for expenditures from the state highway fund must be returned to that fund. Defeat of this amendment could cripple the highway system in Texas. At the very least, it would severely damage the department1s ability to meet future transportation needs. This amendment maintains the user-fee concept. The reimbursements are made from the federal tax that motorists pay every time they fill their fuel tanks. The state money which the reimbursements replace comes from similar state user fees. There is no fairer way to pay for a service than through a user fee, and users pay for highways in direct proportion to their use of them. Similarly, road users should not be required to pay a disproportionate amount of the cost of other needed services. A surfacè transportation system that can anticipate the needs of our grow- ing population and expanding commerce is vital to the economic well-being of our state. Only with assured, uninterrupted funding can maintenance, construction, and long-range planning proceed in a timely manner to prevent disastrous dis- ruption in the movement of goods, services, and people. · This steady, continuing level of funding is imperative. The lack of assurance that federal reimbursements will be returned to the state highway fund will play havoc with long-range planning and disrupt the funding cycle. We urge all Texans to protect their highway system by voting yes for the Good Roads Amendment. ON ON THE 27TH DA Y OF APRIL, 1988. ~ ~-rÆ ~ R Stoker, Jr.. elTber I' I Department: .Ubject: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Administration 9/12/88 Council Meeting Date- Approve Resolution Supportlng tne Need for a~way - Across Northeast Tarrant County - Resolution No. 88-34Ag d N b GN 88-78 en a urn er: The cities/chambers of Northeast Tarrant County (CONET) requested all of the cities affected approve the attached resolution which supports the need for a roadway across Northeast Tarrant County between 135 and the north end of D/FW Airport. An explanation of the resolution is contained in the attached letter from CONET. Recommendation: It is recommended that Resolution No. 88-34 be approved. e Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating dget .Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I I Kfi/~ I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I RESOLUTION NO. 88-34 WHEREAS, cooperative planning for future traffic mobility is a necessity for our City and other cities of Northeast Tarrant County; and WHEREAS, our City has certain unique characteristics which must always be considered; and WHEREAS, we are committed to maximum service and minimum inconvenience to all citizens; and WHEREAS, the possibility exists for state and federal funding of an appropriate mobility facility which will reduce the local ad valorem tax obligation for expanding other City thoroughfares if the facility is constructed. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills will become actively involved in a factual study and planning activity which will address the aspects of need, type and feasibility of a roadway between I-35W and the north end of D/FW Airport; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that we, individually and collectively, will work in cooperation with the CONET Advisory Committee, engineering consultant, North Central Texas Council of Governments and the Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation in this study of mobility requirements in Northeast Tarrant County. PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of September, 1988. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City I' .,. Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I ¡I' I I I I Ie I , 1 C 0 net CITIL5/CHA~8LRS OF NO~TN[ASï TA~RANT COUNTY 5001 benton HLihWdYJ Fo~~ WD~thl 7X 76//7 28/-9376 August 18, 1988 The Honorable Tommy Brown, Mayor P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76180 Dear Torrmy: After a series of meetings with citizens of Northeast Tarrant County and the passage by two city councils of resolutions opposing a IIfreewayll through those cities, the CONET Advisory Committee has concluded that a complete reevaluation of our study process and the final product is necessary. In order to accomplish this change in direction we must (1) secure the approval of the modified study approach by the authorizing entities and (2) obtain cooperation and involvement of the elected officials in all affected cities. We propose to change the character of the study from an emphasis on scientific analysis and Illogical" conclusions to one which will reflect a true consensus of answers "by elected representatives of the cities, based on the best available information, to three. basic questions: ----- ------------- 1. Will there be a NEED for a roadway of some type across Northeast Tarrant County between I-35W and the North end of D/FW Airport? 2. If so, what TYPE of roadway will best serve the purpose -- if not a " IIfreeway", perhaps a IIparkway" or IIsuper arterial II? 3. What is the FEASIBILITY of the desired type of roadway. Is it "cost effective" and can a workable route be found? What is at stake, of course, is something in the neighborhood of a 200-300 million dollar investment of state and federal highway funds in a Itmobility corridorll of some type serving our cities by efficiently handling the traffic volume, which will - one way or another - go through our cities. r·1y belief is that an appropriate type of thoroughfare might well be the ONLY way to preserve the essentially rural, character of our landscape in Northeast "Tarrant County. We solicit your individual and collective involvement in this process of factual study and planning for the future of your city and your neighbors. This proposal is to drop the':~'preferred route" and IIfreeway" designations previously p1·cJposed and to consider the basic questions mentioned above. If you are willing to commit to involvement in this process please indicate by a council resolution for your respective city. This resùìütiû~ is ~ecessâry for the roadway study to continue as funding will be withdrawn if cooperation of the affected cities is not forthcoming. This resolution of cooperation is not an abdication of future options by your city. ~¿ Dan Echols, Chairman CONET Advisory Committee I I I I I I I I I Ie I e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works _ Council Meeting Date: 9/12/88 Subject: A rove Purchase of Land from George P. Macatee III, et al for the Purpose of Constructing Calloway Branc Channel Improvements, Phase II Agenda Number: PU 88-49 The owners of Tracts l3Q and l3A01 in the WILLIAM WALLACE SURVEY, A-1606, were in arrears .on property taxes for years 1985-1987. The matter had been turned over to attorneys for collection of the taxes. Rex McEntire, City Attorney, recommended that the City purchase in fee simple title the two tracts with consideration being payment of the back taxes. The tracts which total 4.52 acres constitute the Calloway Branch Creek and it's embankment between Lola Drive and Loop 820. The City would have had to acquire drainage easements from the tracts as part of the Calloway Branch Channel, Phase II Capital Improvement Project. The tracts have no other use or value since they are almost entirely designated floodway. The total of all City, County and BISD back taxes is $390. Funding Source: This purchase will require a transfer of funds as indicated below. From To 13-24-87-4200 Engineering $ 583.05 $583.05 13-24-87-6050 Right-of-Way Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of purchase of two (2) tracts of land on Calloway Branch from George P. Macatee III, et al for back taxes in the amount of $390 plus $193.05 charged by the County for title reports for a total amount of $583.05. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other . ., ~ Acct. Number See above su~e22:. Available ~ ~/ -?i;_~N~ ~ f< 2N I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ---- . Fmance Director P~np 1 ()f 1 - ~ C:',~ ~ ...~: . !- ---- --------, -- \ , , I -- II.. .. ... ~ ,; .. ~ ~ ~ .sit cB 41... .. .. , ... 'IJ. a S'I't 0 \I) . *'lit l I L'·· I'·' ~ .1: - \8 ~I I '4. .. ( , , -= '1----0 I f 8".ê.,. '"' 48 13 ~. ~<\) . I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Economi c Deve 1 opment _ Council Meeting Date: 9/12/88 Approval of Contract for Purchase Of Land ~rom Richmond Bay Development - Resolution No. 88-33 Agenda Number: PU 88-50 Subject: This contract provides for Richmond Bay to convey the property it owns to the City and to assign certain leases, all in connection with the construction of the proposed golf course. Details of the proposed contract will be provided to the City Council at the meeting Monday night. The cash consideration is $10. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 88-33 authorizing the Mayor to execute subject contract. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) operami Bu get _ Other f I Department I Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available KflL~ City Manager , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I Department: Public Works ~Ubject: Approval of Grapevine Highway Water System ImErovements II Change Order No. 2 I I I I I I II 4IÞ The staff recommends approval of Change Order No.2 in the amount of $4,652.50. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) A Operating BUd.get ., Othe¡ t" I- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date: 9/12/88 Agenda Number: PW 88-30 The proposed Change Order No. 2 is for the additional costs associated with the realignment of the proposed 12 inch water line on Glenview Drive from 15 feet north of the north curb to 2 feet north of the south lip of gutter. The realignment was necessitated by reluctance of property owners to grant easements. Change Order No.2 will cost $4,652.50. Original Contract Price Approved Change Orders To Date Change Order No. 2 $311,111.00 14,945.00 4,652.50 Total Contract Price To Date Total Budgeted for this Project $330,708.50 500,000.00 Recommendation: REV Finance Review Acct. Number 02-09-22-6700 S~S'7ß~ ~ Y¿1i/~- I City Manager , Finance Director .~ ðV~þ ~~ ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM P~"ø 1 nf 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I . KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas August 30, 1988 Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-553, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GRAPEVINE HIGHYAY YATER IMPROVEMENTS, TRANSMITTAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 Ye are transmitting Change Order No.2 for the referenced project which has been signed by the Contractor, Circle 'c' Construction Company. The total amount of the change order is $4,652.50. Please place this item on the next Council agenda for consideration of approval. This change ·order is for the realignment of the proposed 12-inch Yaterline on Glenview Drive due to difficulties in obtaining easement Parcels 10 & 11. To avoid having to acquire these two easements the 12-inch Yaterline is relocated from 15 feet North of the north back curb to 2.0 feet North of Glenview Drive's south lip of gutter. Upon Council approval we will instruct the contractor to proceed with this modification. Meanwhile, please call if you have any questions. ~.w.~ RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E. SLS/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I,' - . I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I f~ K-E- F NO. 3-553 CHANGE ORDER NO.2 TO THE CONTRACT WHICH ~JAS DATED JUNE 23 ' , 1988 Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (OWNER) And CIRCLE ICI CONSTRUCTION CO. (CONTRACTOR) For (Description of Project) GRAPEVI¡~E HIGH~.JÄY WATER SYST£t.I H1PROVd1EIHS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: 1. Construct 12-inch diameter (Cl. 150) PVC waterline on Glenview Drive 2.0 feet north of the 3D-inch south lip of gutter instead of 15 feet north of the north back of curb. Refer to the revised Plan-Profile Sheet I~o. 9R of 18 for more details. 2. The realignment of the 12-inch waterline changes the estimated quantities of Bid Item 'No. 15 "Asphalt Pavement Replacement" and Bid Item No. 19, "Saw Cut", from 178 linear feet and 20 linear feet to 438 linear feet and 884 linear feet, respectively. Also, the estimated quantity for Bid Item No. 18, "6-inch Curb and 18-inch Gutter", is revised from 40 linear feet to 6 linear feet. 3. Remove and replace 6-inch curb and 3D-inch gutter at centerline station 51+84.6. Three linear feet is the estimated quantity for this item; however, this footage is made equivalent to the 6-inch curb and 18-inch gutter length by increasing it by 50 percent. Thus, 4.5 linear feet of 6-inch curb and 3D-inch gutter is reflected in the 6-inch curb and 18-inchgutter quantity. 4. Install 5 linear feet of 6-inch diameter (Cl. 150) PVC pipe at approximate centerl ine station 51+82 as shown in the detail on the P-lan-Profile Sheet No. 9 R to 18. 5. The ductile iron fittings, Bid Item No. 11, is revised from 0.7 to 1.4 tons. 6. Install '8-inch diameter ductile iron pipe trench span at approximate center- line station 51+73.6. 7. Beginning at centerline station 45+99.2, remove and replace entire concrete driveway approach. Therefore, Bid Item No. 17 is adjusted from "Sidewalkll with an es t imated quant ity of 100 square feet to "Remove and Rep 1 ace Concrete Driveway" with an estimated quantity of 211 square feet. Add the following"quantities to existing Contract Items: UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANT. TOTAL 2 6" Dia (Cl 150) PVC Pipe cr:- 15.00 5 $ 75.00 11 Ductile Iron Fittings TON 2000.00 0.7 1,400.00 12 8" Oi a DIP Trench Span L .S~ 350.00 1 350.00 15 Asphalt Pavement Replacement L. F. 9.00 260 2,340.00 17 Remove & Replace Concrete Orwy S.F. 2.50 III 277.50 19 Saw Cut L. F. 1.00 864 864.00 SUB- TOTAL -- '.--.---. $ 5,306.50 .. ...... ...... ....... ........ I :< ~, , I" e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2, Change Orde~ No.2, K-E-F No. 3-553 Delete the following quantities to existing Contract Items: NO. . DESCRIPT ION TJ 6" Di a. DIP Trench Span 18 611 Curb & 1811 Gutter SUB- TOTAL UNIT PRICE 300.00 12.00 QUANT. 1 29.5 UNIT L. S. L. F. ....... .............. .......- TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST ............... EXISTING CONTRACT ANOUr~T .............. REV ISED CONTRACT Ar10UNT ............... Contract completion time shall be increased by ( ~ TOTAL 300.00Y 354.00~ 654.00 4,652.50 326,056.00 330,708.50 days because of this change. CONTRACT0;YS OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE: By:t~;' ç4r- / ' ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE: Date: 1~1/...fg BY:~~ W. ~ pate: 8'... 3ò , 19 88 OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Date: , 1988 , 1988 I Department: Public Works ~Ubject: Approval of Hightower Drive Paving & Drainage I Improvements - Change Order No.2 I I I I I I 13-90-99-4300 $1,234.00 14IÞ Unspecified 1986 GO Streets I I I I I I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Oper~ting Budget 1- Oth4J¿¿... :De I I '~-~~,""",-., ~> CITY OF NORTH RICH LA NO HILLS Council Meeting Date: 9/12/88 Agenda Number: PW 88-31 The proposed Change Order No. 2 is for installation of extra water and drainage fittings required due to the existing pipes not being in the previously indicated horizontal and vertical positions. The cost for Change Order No.2 is $6,356.21. Original Contract Price Approved Change Orders To Date Change Order No.2 $ 451,620.97 3,608.22 6,356.21 $ 461,585.40 457,933.00 Total Contract Price To Date Total Budgeted for this Project -Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available from ClP Unspecified and will require a transfer for the proposed change order as indicated below: From To 13-04-86-6150 $1,234.00 Hightower Construction 02-09-99-6700 $5,123.00 Unspecified - Water System 02-09-56-6700 $5,123.00 Hightower Utility Adjustments Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of Change Order No.2 in the amount of $6,356.21 and the transfer of funds as indicated above. Finance Review GO & REV , Finance Director ,t{L~ IrIf City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM P~np 1 nf 1 I ~ I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, IN CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 2, 1988 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Vorks City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 @mD\Vlfg S1æ8 Re: 3-343, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS HIGHTOWER DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPVTS. REVISED CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 Attached is Change Order No. 2 to the referenced project which has been signed by the Contractor, Austin Paving. This change order covers the - extra cost for special water and drainage fittings installed by the contractor as requested by the Public Yorks Department. These special fittings were required after subsurface excavations revealed conditions . unknown prior to construction. You may wish to include this item on the next Council agenda for Council consideration of approval. Upon approval for payment, we will add these items to the Contract for reimbursement to the Contractor in next month's Contractor's Request for Payment. The total amount of this proposed change order is $6,356.21 and will increase the Contract amount from $455,229.19 to $461,585.40. Funding in the amount of $5,122.83 should come from the appropriate water utility accoµnt, and funding in the amount of $1,2J3.38 should come from the project drainage account. Please call if you have any questions. / w. RICHARD V. ALBIN, P.E. RVA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 41 .~. K-E-F NO. 3-343 CHANGE ORDER NO.~TO THE CONTRACT VHICH VAS DATED MARCH 15, 1988 . Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (OWNER) And AUSTIN PAVING (CONTRACTOR) For (Description of Project) HIGHTOVER DRIVE · PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS : Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: Add the following new items to the contract : ITEM UNIT EST. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANT. 12V. Special Fittings L.S. 5122.83 1 12D. 57 X 38 CMAP Material L.S. 1233.38 1 TOTAL COST $5,122.83 1,233.38 TOTAL .. ........ ...... ....... ..... ... ..... .... $6,356.21 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST .......................... $ 6,356.21 EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT.......................... $ 455,229.19 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT .......................... $ 461,585.40 Contract completion time shall be increased by days because of this change. CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE: BY:~~~ ~ ~ / Date: , 1988 ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE: By: , 1988 W, ~Date: 9,- ~ OVNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Date: , 1988 I· CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: Public Works _ Council Meeting Date: 9/12/88 -SUbject: Approve Proposed Installation of Sidewalk on Starnes Agenda Number: PW 88-32 I Road I I I I I I 1_ I I 1 I 1 Numerous citizens have requested the City to install sidewalk on Starnes Road to allow an all weather surface for the children to walk on to get to new North Ridge Elementary. The current Starnes Road Project does not include any sidewalk construction. The CIP Committee recommends that a 4 foot wide sidewalk be installed on the north side of Starnes Road from Shady Hollow Lane to Timberhi1l Drive. The total estimated sidewalk to be installed would be 4,936 feet in length. Total estimated cost for this amount of sidewalk construction should not exceed $50,000. If this item is approved by Council, Staff will negotiate a "Change Order" to the Starnes Road Project and bring said "Change Order" to Council for formal approval at a subsequent meeting. Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available from Unspecified CIP Street Funds and will require a transfer as indicated below: From To 13-90-99-4600 $50,000 Unspecified Prior to 1985 13-03-85-6125 Starnes Road Sidewalk (New Account) $50,000, Recommendation: The staff recommends the Council to approve installation of the proposed sidewalk on Starnes Road as described above and the transfer of funds as indicated. I Source of Funds: I Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ op.erating Budge - °:gL¿~ ( Finance Review Acct. Number See above Sufficien~dS Available - ¢~ ~l~ City Manager . Finance Director -GíL Paae 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 7, 1988 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-342, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS STARNES ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPVTS. SIDEVALKS COST ESTIMATE As requested by the ClP Committee in their meeting of September 6, 1988, we have computed the estimated cost of_ sidewalk construction on the north side of Starnes Road from Shady Hollow Lane to Timberhill Drive. The total estimated sidewalk length on the north side of Starnes is about 4,936 linear feet. Based on a 4-inch thick, 4-foot wide reinforced concrete sidewalk at $2.00 per square foot, the total estimated construction cost is $39,488. Ve would note that the sidewalk construction price in the Emerald Hills contract, with J.L. Bertram, is $1.50 per square foot. At this price the total sidewalk construction cost would be $29,616. The sidewalk price in the Vatauga Road contract is $2.06; in the Martin contraét it is $2.58; and in the Hightower contract, the sidewalk construction price is $2.90 per square foot. The original bid amount of the Starnes Road contract is $904,568.17. The current contract amount, including change orders, is $947,197.44. Based on the 25-percent rule, a maximum total .of $226,142.04 in change orders may be added to this contract if required. The bid amount for the Emerald Hills Vay contract is $202,146.76. A maximum total of $50,536.69 may be added to that contract. Ve would note that the current contract quantity for sidewalk construction in the Emerald Hills way contract is 5,995 square feet. The total north side sidewalk quantity on the Starnes Road contract is 19,744 square feet. Since this quantity exceeds 20-percent of the contract amount, the contractor may renegotiate the unit price if a change order is added to the Emerald Hills Vay contract for construction of the Starnes Road sidewalk. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. w.~ RICHARD V. ALBIN, P.E. RVA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I _" , I ?cale. : I = \0011 ¡ I ~~~ 8 ~~ : I I l'L-1- C'A ~ ' þ~- H'=WU ~'.. m~ :~ - ~ KiOi ~ - -~- ,- T , , T '-_ _'- ~~~ !r / " -- c --- >--~!:.::i=Æ í Ïi ---+-t =r I ill --;---... -j _ >--V --+---< --< '---<- >-- 't - ~ ~I---~k '-- 1--+---<' ~ ~ '- .. _ .., W '" T '-- 1--+--<,--4 \ _ ~ !±: ~ _ ::: >--t:::~H/11 I --<':= >- -~ ~ r~' ~~ E SJ,i ì I --< '- 'íB=ï ~5 ~. . I =~:'T §i~ ~ S~~lJ ' >-- hL1 >--!ti4:m- mJ - Õ.,y F:: I I >--,~ '>."1 , ~ fll I I ¡ I j, . ' bl I d\.-·.n D. '-'ì FrIll 1/1' Y jlTHlfli ~ <morT' ~ /, Iml=1 III i ii i , ErïJJ)}L liiU ~ iJ1J ~ ~TI II III f V ifìiìrrnr ..-- LYJ H =j r 1)" 11/8 I t=J 111 - "0.'''(. [r I I I /~ T r , r r ~" ~o '-- CO", Alii " ~ ~ - - ~ I~--- '"-- ...- - '-- f- I-- I-- f-- ~ I-- I ~3 ~ I-- f-- I-- - I , r /~ I-- ;~ I-- I-- --- h I-- :~ ~ ,~I-- , I - /,r I I-- .~ ~ ;1-- /1~ LJ /' r-' L1:: I-- I /~x ~ I-¡ '---' fTT'T'Tr.- ,.. ~ Q ~ ,,- ../ -. .... ~ ¡I(iff I- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: -SUbject: I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget ,., Otir . I I I I I I Ie Public Works 9/12/88 - Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PW 88-33 of Emerald Hills Wa Water Line Reconstruction as Change Order No. 1 to Martin Drive Paving & Drainage Improvements The proposed Change Order No.1 is for replacement of existing 12 inch deteriorating cast iron water main on Emerald Hills Way from Davis Boulevard east to Cork Lane and the associated service transfers. The necessity of replacing this water main did not become evident until after bids had been taken on the Emerald Hills Way Paving Improvements project. The Emerald Hills Way Paving Improvements contractor was contacted first concerning this reconstruction of the water line, but his prices quoted were too high. The Martin Drive Paving Improvements contractor gave the City prices under our preliminary estimate. Change Order No.1 will cost $80,949.40. Original Contract Price Approved Change Orders To Date Ch~nge Order No. 1 $636,720.64 -0- 80,949.40 Total Contract Price To Date Total Budgeted for this Project $717,670.04 825,412.00 Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available in Utility CIP Unspecified and will require a transfer as indicated below: From To 02-09-99-6700 $80,950 Utility CIP Unspecified 02-09-82-6700 $80,950 Martin Drive - Water Adjustments Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $80,949.40 and the transfer of funds as indicated above. Finance Review REV , Finance Director above ~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Paae 1 of 1 I ' I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWl TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas August 29, 1988 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-347, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MARTIN DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINGE IMPVTS. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Attached is Change Order No. 1 to the referenced project for the Emerald Hills water line which has been signed by the Contractor for the Martin Drive project, Austin Paving. This change order covers the cost of replacing the entire existing 12-inch water main in Emerald Hills Yay and 6-inch water line in Emerald Court with new 12-inch and 6-inch PVC water mains, including water service transfers and other appurtenances. A pay item is provided for temporarily replacing the concrete driveways with crushed stone called "Crushed Stone Pavement". The Contractor will be required to maintain these crushed stone driveways until they are replaced with new concrete driveway approaches as part of the pavement construction project by J.L. Bertram Construction Company. The total amount of the change order is $80,949.40, which is about 13-percent of the total contract amount of $636,720.64. After approval of this change order by the City Council, please return a fully executed copy to our office for our files and distribution to the Contractor. Meanwhile, should you have any questions concerning this project, please do not hesitate to call. ~w,~ RICHARD V. ALBIN, P.E. RVA/ra/Enclosures cc: Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I· I I Ie I .., , .. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE CONTRACT YHICH VAS DATED Between And CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS K-E-F NO. 3-347 For (Description of Project) AUSTIN PAVING CONSTRUCTION CO. (OYNER) (CONTRACTOR) MARTIN DRIVE . PAVING ~ DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS : Add the following New Items to the existing Contract items: DESCRIPTION UNIT Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: 1 Construct approximately 2,045 L.F. of 12" Dia. (DR-18) PVC water line and approximately 715 L.F. of 6" Dia. (DR-I8) PVC water line and accessories in Emerald Hills Yay as shown on sheets 2R, 3 and 4. ITEM NO. 2Y. 4Y. 6\1. 8Y. 10Y. IIV. 12W. 13W. 14Y. 15Y. 12" PVC Yater Line 6" PVC Yater Line 12" Gate Valve & Box 6" Gate Valve & Box Ductile Iron Fittings Fire Hydrants Long Double Yater Service Long Single Vater Service Short Single Yater Service Yater Meter Transfers L.F. L.F. EACH EACH TON EACH EACH EACH EACH EACH UNIT PRICE 23.76 13.70 739.03 316.73 1,847.56 818.21 369.51 348.40 263.94 100.30 Add the following New Items to the existing Contract items: . . . . ITEM NO. SUBTOTAL . . . . . . . . . . DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE 20Y. Asphalt Pavement Replacement 21V. Short Double Yater Service 22Y. 8"x8" Tap. Sleeve & 8" Tap. Gate Valve 23W'. Crushed Stone Pavement L.F. 3.80 EACH 216.00 EACH 1.300.00 L.F. 3.75 SUBTOTAL . . .. .... TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST. . EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT . . REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT. . . ,. . . 'I_'c EST. QUANT. 2,045.00 715.00 1.00 9.00 2.85 2.00 5.00 2.00 2.00 23.00 EST. QUANT. 75.00 $ 14.00 1.00 556.00 TOTAL COST 48/589.20 9,795.50 739.03 2,850.57 5,265.55 1,636.42 1,847.55 696.80 527.88 2,306.90 $74,255.40 TOTAL COST 285.00 3,024.00 1,300.00 2,085.00 $ 6.694.00 $ 80.949.40 $ 636,720.64 $ 717.670.04 Contract completion time shall be increased by '. -\' ,--~ý-' 50 ) days because of this change. ~. r Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I . .." . . ~ : CHANGE ORDER NO.1, continued CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE: ~~ By: I-.--à ¿? J Da te: ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE: / / J. /) A .J1 ' By: V{/. ~ Date: OVNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Date: ~. ~::> g,-ZCj K-E-F NO. 3-347 , 1988 , 1988 , 1988 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: Purchasing _ Council Meeting Date: ~ Approve final payment to I.W. Gilmore Construction and ~ubject: Calvin Baker Construction, Joint Venture, in the amount Agenda Number: II of $25,344.75 and authorize transfer of funds. I I I 9/12/88 PAY 88-4 The Police Department and City Administration is 100% complete and operational. Outlined below is a recap of expense for the above mentioned project. Budgeted Actual Savings (Deficit) Police Project $2,116,053 $2,131,274 ($15,221) $ 1,912 City Hall Project $ 205,761 $ 203,849 The $15,221 deficit on the Police Facility is a result of a $10,800 change in the detention equipment for improved security in the jail. The $4,421 remaining amount is a result of a change in the flooring for the jail area to a non-skid floor to alleviate the chance of prisoners or police officers falling. e Sufficient funds are available to cover the deficit in the Police Project as outlined below: Unspecified 1985 Police 13-90-99-5100 $ 204 Unspecified Building Fund 13-90-99-4800 $15,017 $15,221 Recommendation: Approve final payment to T. W. Gilmore Construction and Calvin Baker Construction, Joint Venture, in the amount of $25,344.75 and authorize transfer of funds as outlined above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget e, er , I x & 13-90-99-4800 , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1