Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC 1988-09-26 Agendas
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~I P·':'~:·"'·'."" . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 26, 1988 - 6:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. GN 88-94 Adopting Budget FY 1988-89 _ Ordinance No. 1569 (Agenda Item #20 and related matters) (20 Minutes) 2. IR 88-40 Water and Sanitary Sewer Pass Through Increase for 1988-89 (10 Minutes) 3. PU 88-53 New Fire Station - Replacement for Fire Station #2, 6801 Glenview (Agenda Item #25) (15 Minutes) 4. GN 88-96 Proposed AS/400 Computer System (Agenda Item #22) (15 Minutes) 5. IR 88-38 1987-88 Miscellaneous Water and Sewer Improvements - Presentation of Plans (5 Minutes) 6. IR 88-39 1988 Miscellaneous Street Reconstruction and Repair Project - Presentation of Plans (5 Minutes) 7. Possible Work Session (5 Minutes) 8. Other Items I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~.··I ';:"\ <',I :1 }'I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. Adjournment 10. *Executive Session (5 Minutes) a. Land Acquisition b. Pending Litigation c. Personnel - Board Appointments *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 26, 1988 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting September 12, 1988 5. Presentation of Green Thumb Award to Jason Merit, District Manager of Two Pesos. (Presentation to be made by Bruce Auld and Wanda Strong, Northeast Tarrant County Chamber of Commerce) 6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 7. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 & 31) 8. GN 88-82 Appointments to Board of Adjustment 9. GN 88-83 Appointments to Board of Appeals 10. GN 88-84 Appointments to Cable TV Board I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 11. GN 88-85 Appointments to Capital Improvement Advisory Committee. 12. GN 88-86 Appointments to Civil Service Commission 13. GN 88-87 Appointments to Library Board 14. GN 88-88 Appointments to Parks and Recreation Board 15. GN 88-89 Appointments to Beautification Committee 16. GN 88-90 Appointments to Planning and Zoning Commission *17. GN 88-91 Certified Tax Roll - Resolution No. 88-30 *18. GN 88-92 Granting of Exemptions FY 1988-89 - Resolution No. 88-37 *19. GN 88-93 Setting Tax Rate for Fiscal Year 1988-89 - Ordinance No. 1567 *20. GN 88-94 Adopting Budget FY 1988-89 _ Ordinance No. 1569 *21. GN 88-95 Transfer of Laidlaw Waste Disposal Fees - Ordinance No. 1555 *22. GN 88-96 Proposed AS/400 Computer System I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *23. PU 88-51 Award of Bid to *Miller Business Systems for the Annual Office Supply Contract *24. PU 88-52 Recommendation to Approve Bid for City Property Insurance for 1988-89 *25. PU 88-53 New Fire Station - Replacement for Fire Station #2, 6801 Glenview ~*26. PU 88-54 Rejecting all Bids (Proposals) on Golf Course - Resolution No. 88-38 *27. PU 88-55 Purchase of Right-of-Way from Jenny Coleman, et al for the Purpose of Constructing Smithfield Road (Parcel #3) *28. PW 88-34 Approval of Change Order No. 5 _ Grapevine Highway Water System Improvements *29. PW 88-35 Approval of Change Order No. 10 _ Watauga Road Paving and Drainage Improvements *30. PW 88-36 Approval of Change Order No. 11 _ Watauga Road Paving and Drainage Improvements I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *31. PW 88-37 Approval of Change Order No. 12 _ Watauga Road Paving and Drainage Improvements 32. Adjournment I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie 'I' I I I I 'I I Ie I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. I R 88-40 Date: September 26, 1988 Subject: Amendment to Water Servi ce Contract to the Ci ty of Fort Worth and Water and Sanitary Sewer Pass Through Charges for 1988-89 The City of North Richland Hills purchases treated water under the terms ' of a contract with the City of Fort Worth which was executed on March 19, 1964. The City of North Richland Hills Council approved the First Amendment to this original contract on September 28, 1987 (Ordinance No. 1491). The amendment was adopted by the Council with the expectation that a new Wholesale Customer's Water Contract would be negotiated and adopted prior to October 1, 1988. The Mayors Council Water Renegotiation Committee has been pursuing this issue with the City of Fort Worth, but has not yet been able to come to a complete agreement on the new contract. In view of this, the Fort Worth Water Department has requested approval of a Second Amendment to the 1964 contract pending completion of negotiations for a new contract (see attached letter). Based on either our original City of Fort Worth contract, or the Second Amendment which is requested by Fort Worth to be approved prior to October 1, 1988, the City of North Richland Hills is facing a sizeable increase in our water costs. The increase in water supply costs will cause an approximate 5% increase in our water billing rates per our pass through clause in the Water and Sewer Increase Ordinance No. 1552, adopted on June 27, 1988. In order to allow sufficient time for study of these issues, we discussed this matter with a representative of the Fort Worth City Manager's office, and requested that a Fort Worth Representative attend a North Richland Hills Council Work Session on October 3, 1988. Action by the City Council will be recommended at the October 10, 1988 Council Meeting. Additionally, the City of North Richland Hills has a contract with the City of Fort Worth for acceptance and treatment of sewage which was adopted by the City Council May 28, 1987 (Resolution No. 87-16). This contract allows for yearly review by the City of Fort Worth's staff, with rate adjustments to be made in accordance with the contract's methodology. Based on this year's review by the City of Fort Worth staff, the sewer cost will increase by $0.1028 per 100 cubic feet billed, which would result in a 10.5% increase in sewer billing rates to North Richland Hills' customers. Mayor Pro Tem Richard Davis is our representative on the Wastewater System Advisory Committee that was created by this Wholesale Customer's Wastewater Contract with Fort Worth. Mr. Davis can advise the City Council concerning this matter, which is also proposed for discussion at the October 3rd work session. Respectfully submitted, ( /q£7ú'.~ ns lic Works/Utilities ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS I /~:¡..: ", ttqÃA.-·.~r !fit!~ I ~ Worth I ater Department I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I Ie I I £,0 , ¿ 1988 P.o. Box 870 1000 Throckmorton Fort Worth, Texas 76101-0870 inistration Division 817/870-8220 September 7, 1988 Honorable Tommy Brown, Mayor City of North Richland Hills P.O. Drawer 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Dear Mayor Brown: Recently the Fort Worth Water Department received written notice from the chairman of the Tarrant County Mayors' Council, Jerry Boone, that representa- tives of the Mayors' Council at their August 1, 1988, meeting had unanimously voted to reject the most current draft of a proposed wholesale water contract. In addition, the members of the Mayors' Council initially proposed that a new amendment to the water contracts be prepared that would incorporate rates for the fiscal year 1988-89 based on projected adjustments contained in the Touche Ross IIReport on Wholesale Water Rates." Since that time, however,the chairman of the Mayors' Council has revised the previous request in a letter dated September 1, 1988. This latest letter requests Fort Worth to develop a new contract amendment and include 1989 rates by using the Touche Ross computer model and the latest 1989 wholesale revenue requirements. You will recall that last year the wholesale customers approved a contract amend- ment with Fort Worth that included the wholesale water rates currently in effect. This amendment was developed in anticipation that negotiations on a new whole- sale water contract would be concluded successfully during this fiscal year 1988. A provision was contained in this approved 1987 contract amendment that addressed the possibility that new wholesale water contracts might not become a reality before October 1, 1988, and specified that a wholesale water rate for the upcoming five-year period beginning on October 1, 1988, would be developed. The 1987 contract amendment required Fort Worth to use the Touche Ross computer model to develop a new five-year rate projection, and then set the wholesale treatment, pumping and transmission rate for that five-year period at the level required to meet the fiscal year 1991 revenue requirement. The cost of raw water, as set by the Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District #1, would continue to be a direct pass-through each year to the inside and outside district wholesale customers. The raw water charge is adjusted annually by the TCWCID based on its prOjected revenue requirements and water utilization. In accordance with this approved 1987 contract amendment, the Fort Worth Water Department has calculated the rates that would be utilized during the next five years, assuming no new or amended wholesale water agreements, as follows: City of Fort Worth l- Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I :1 I I Ie I Page 2 September 7, 1988 URATE SCHEDULE AU INSIDE Volume Rates (Per 1000 gal.) DISTRICT OUTSIDE DISTRICT $.3511 $.6191 $.9702 Treatment, Pumping and Transmission $.3511 Raw Water (FY 1989 Only). $.5186 Total Volume Rate $.8697 Maximum Day Rate (Per MGD in excess of average day) $71,149 Maximum Hour Rate (Per MGD in excess of maximum day) $30,501 $25 Meter Charge ($/meter/month) Due to the lateness in this fiscal year, it appeared to be an insurmountable task to negotiate and obtain approval from all the wholesale customers for a new contract amendment which could have dealt with the rate issue in any other manner. However, Mayor Boone has revised his request of August 8, 1988 by send- ing a second request on September 1st which recommends an amendment that would direct Fort Worth to use the latest 1989 revenue requirement and the rate design methodology developed by Touch Ross to project fiscal year 1989 rates. Three copies of a contract amendment are attached that would authorize Fort Worth to develop fiscal year 1989 rates by using the Touche Ross computer model to update the 1989 wholesale water revenue requirement. Fort Worth staff has calculated the updated fiscal year 1989 rates, using projected 1989 revenue requirements, and these rates are as follows: URATE SCHEDULE BII INSIDE Volume Rates (Per 1000 gal.) DISTRICT OUTSIDE DISTRICT $.3183 $.6191 $.9374 Treatment, Pumping and Transmission $.3183 Raw Water (FY 1989 Only) $.5186 Total Volume Rate $.8369 Maximum Day Rate (Per MGD in excess of average day) $62,974 Maximum Hour Rate (Per MGD in excess of maximum day) $29,450 $25 Meter Charge ($/meter/month) I' Ie I I I I I I I' Ie I· I I I II I I Ie I Page 3 September 7, 1988 It will be necessary for all of Fort Worth's wholesale water customers to execute this 1988 contract amendment in order to avoid any contractual complications that could arise if a portion of the wholesale class chooses to leave the 1987 amendment in place. Therefore, every wholesale customer will need to return the three executed copies by 5:00 P.M. September 30, 1988, in order for Fort Worth to adopt rate schedule "B". If all wholesale customers do not execute the contract amendment, Fort·Worth must adopt rate schedule "A" under the 1987 contract amendment. The City of Fort Worth still believes that the principal of annual rate adjust- ments has considerable merit and pledges to continue to negotiate in good faith toward a new contractual relationship with all our participating cities. We recognize that this letter may be somewhat confusing and includes a short notice period to proceed with a contract amendment. The approval of a contract amendment by all wholesale customers prior to October 1 is not an impossible task but will require your immediate consideration. If you have any questions about this please do not hesitate to call me or Sam Nunn. S i nc y , / ( \ Richard W. Sawey Water Oi rector RWS:u Enclosure cc: Mr. Rodger Line, City Manager Mr. Greg Dickens, Public Works Director I' .~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I Ie I I SECOND AMENDMENT TO CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NO. This agreement entered into this day of between the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills. , 1988, by and WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills entered into a contract for water service dated March 19, 1964, same being City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No. 4947; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 1987, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills entered into an amendent of City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No. 4947, same being City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No. 16112; and WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills are desirous of amending said City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract Numbers 4947 and 16112; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 5, Section 38, of City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No. 16112 is hereby amended and, after having been so amended, shall read as follows: lib. Commodity Charge and Rates of Use Charge. IIExcept for fiscal year 1988-1989, the rate shall be reviewed and adjusted every three (3) years beginning in fiscal year 1989-1990. The cost related to the projection and transmission function of distributing treated water to the Fort Worth city limits in wholesale quantities plus a service -1- I· ' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I I lie I . - charge shall be determined in accordance with the methods herein. Such costs shall be projected through the City of Fort Worth fiscal year 1991 to establish the fair 'rate for water to be charged during the period October 1, 1989, to September 30, 1992. The adjusted rate shall be made effectfve October 1, 1989. A similar review and rate adjustment shall be made for each succeeding three year period for the term of this contract. For the rates for the three (3) years beginning 1989-1990, the Touche Ross Study dated September, 1987, and computer model included therewith shall be used by Fort Worth to project the rates to be charged for said three (3) year period. The following rates are hereby established for the period October 1, 1988, to September 30, 1989: Volume Rates (Per 1000 gal.) Treatment, Pumping and Transmission Raw Water Total Volume Rate OUTSIDE DISTRICT $.3183 $.6191 $.9374 Maximum Day Rate (Per MGD in excess of average day) $62,974 Maximum Hour Rate (Per MGD in excess of maximum day) $29,450 Meter Charge ($/meter/month) $25 2. Every other term, condition and/or covenant contained in City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract Numbers 4947 and 16112 not amended hereby shall be unaffected hereby and shall continue in full force and effect. -2- I' : Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I I Ie I ATTEST: Ci ty Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney Date: -3- CITY OF FORT WORTH By: Assistant City Manager By: I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I I Ie I )j (~B'+~:J·~;~~ .. J~~{¡, >. \t" _ ~_~' "'j .....~.:..~. :..'!e.... YORS' COUNCIL of TARRANT COUNTY September 8, 1988 Hon. Tommy Brown Mayor, No. Richland Hills P.O. Drawer 18609 No. Richland Hills,TX 76180 SUBJECT: IMPORTANT WATER CONTRACT AMENDMENT Dear Mayor Brown: We urge you to review and consider approval of Fort Worth's one-year amendment for FY 88-89 water contracts. You should have recently received the proposal from Mr. Richard Sawey, Director of the Fort Worth Water Department. The amendment must be formally approved and returned to Mr. Sawey prior to October 1, 1988 in order to be accepted. Without the adoption of the amendment, your FY 88-89 water rates will surely be higher than they will be with the amendment. Best personal regards, h~ Jerry Boone, Chairman Tarrant County Mayors' Council (817)295-6179 Azle Bedford Benbrook Blue Mound Burleson Colleyville Crowley Oalworthington Gardens Edgecliff Village Euless Everman Forest Hill Grand Prairie Grapevine Haltom City Haslet Hurst Keller Kennedale ..~:¡~~s~de ..>:~~:. ~~~~h c~~~.~!~~I~ N. Richland Hills Pantego Peli.can Bay Richland Hills River Oaks I- ~~ I~~¿)~ I P '-J ~ I I I I I I Ie I· I I II I I I Ie I .. MAYORS' .~.~téOO~... !~~ \i ~.~ ~[~t!~j ...~ . . . ~.. ... ...... COUNCIL of TARRANT COUNTY September 1, 1988 Richard Sawey, Director City of Fort Worth Fort Worth Water Department 1000 Throckmorton Fort Worth, Texas 76101 Dear Mr. Sawey: On August 8, 1988, a letter was transmitted to you from the Mayors' Council regarding the water contract amendment for Fiscal Year 1988-89. Please consider this letter as a revision of the previous letter from the Mayors' Council. At this time, the Mayors' Council is proposing that a new customer'city contract amendment be established for Fiscal Year 1988/89. It is recommended that the wording for the Fiscal Year 1988-89 amendment be similar to the wording of the Fiscal Year 1987-88 contract amendment. It is further recommended that the 1988-89 wholesale customer water rates be determined by using the latest Ci ty of Fort Worth audi ted revenue requirements and the rate design methodology established by Touche-Ross in the "Ci ty of Fort Worth Report on Wholesale Water Rates", dated September 1, 1987. It is understood that the wholesale water rates identified in the Touche-Ross study for the 1989-92 period were projections only and that new wholesale rates are to be established at this time. After the contract amendment is prepared by the Fort Worth staff, it is anticipated that the documents will be presented to the Fort Worth Council on September 6, and if approved, it will be mailed to each customer city for their approval and returned to you by October 1, 1988. Azle ~ !edford · Benbrook · Blue ~ound · Brfar · Burle~on . Co11cyvi11e . Crow1ey . Oalworthfngton Gardens. Edgeclff' V111age a Euless · Everman · Forest HI11 · Grand Prafrie . GrapeYine . Haltom Cfty . Haslet . Hur~t . Kel1er . Kennedale. lakesfde. lake ~orth · Mansffeld . H. Rfchland Hflls . Pantego. Rfchland Hfl1s . Rfver Oaks; Sagfnaw. Sansom Park · So~thl4ke · Watauga . Westlake. Westworth Vi11age . Whfte Settlement. I' .. Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I Ie I I The acceptance of this amendment will allow the customer ci ties and Fort Worth addi tional time to complete the negotiation process to formulate a new wholesale water contract. I am hopeful that the unresolved issues of the contract can be agreed upon by all parties and the new contract will be finalized by the year end. Sincerely" ~ J rry Bone Chairman Tarrant County Mayors' Council cc: Mayor Bob Bolen" City of Fort Worth Mayor Pro-Tem Bert Williams" City of Fort Worth Doug Harmon, City Manager, City of Fort Worth Councilman Gary Gilley" City of Fort Worth Councilman Russell Lancaster, City of Fort Worth I Department: Utilitv _ Council Meeting Date: &Ubject: Amendment to Water Service Contract With City of Agenda Number: Fort Worth - Ordinance No. 1491 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget - Other .1 ., /. . . I I I I I I I I e I . ') .- . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 9-28-87 PW 87-31 The attached 'proposed ordinance will amend the March 19, 1964 wate~ service contract with the City of Fort Worth. The amendment will allow the City of Fort Worth during fiscal year 1987-88 to charge the water service rates as determined by Touche Ross & Co. in their study dated September 1, 1987. The methodology used in the study was based on determination of wholesale water revenue requirements with rates set accordingly. The City of Fort Worth and the Wholesale Water Rates Steering Committee cooperated in selection of the consultant and review of the findings. The amendment will only allow the yearly adjustable rates to be charged for one year, after which time we will revert back to the five year adjustable rate system as outlined in the original contract. During this one year period, it is the City of Fort Worth's and the Wholesale Water Customers' intention to renegotiate a new water service contract to their mutual benefit. The existing contract, if not amended, would provide a 14.3 per cent increase in the wholesale water rate charged by Fort Worth for water sold to North Richland Hills; whereas, the attached proposed ordinance provides for no increase. rl Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 1491 adopting an amendment to the City of Fort Worth's Water Service Contract as described above. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available .Rlif~ nt Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director 1 Page 1 of Ie between the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills. I I ',~~ /' ~ J. .' ~ I FIRST AMENDMENT TO CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NO. 4947 This Agreement entered into this day of 28th ~Ppt-pmhpr , 1987, by and WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills entered into a contract for water service dated March 19, ~964, same being City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No. 4947; I and I I I I Ie I· I I 'I I I WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills are desirous of amending said City of Fort Worth Secretary Contract Number 4947; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 5, Section 3(b), is herëby amended and, after having been so amended, shall read as follows: lib. Commodity Charge and Rates of Use Charge. "Except for fiscal year 1987-1988, the rate shall be reviewed and adjusted every five (5) years beginning in fiscal year 1988-1989. The cost related to the production and ,transmission fun~tion of distributing treated water to the Fort Worth city limits in wholesale quantities plus a service charge shall be dete~ined in accordance with the methods herein. Such costs shall be projected through,~he Ci~y of Fort Worth fiscal year 1991 to establish the fair rate for water to·be charged during the period October I, 1988, to September 30, 1993. The adjusted rate shall be made effective October I, 1988. A similar review and rate adjustment shall be made for each succeeding five year period for the term of this contract. For the rates for the five (5) years beginning 1988-1989, the Touche Ross study dated September, 1987, and computer model included therewith shall be used by Fort Worth to project the rates to be charged for said five (5) year peri~d. "For the period October 1, 1987, to September 30, 1988, the rates indicated and the detail methodology used in the study conducted by Touche Ross & Co., dated September 1, 1987, will be adopted." 2. Every other term, condition and/or covenant contained in City of Fort'Worth I City Secretary Contract Number 4947 not amended hereby shall be unaffected hereby l4IÞand shall continue in full force and effect. I I' . .' .. .. ATTEST: Ie City Secretary I' I I . Date: I I I I leDate: Q;9f'. J? CITY OF FORT WORTH BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney ATTEST: ç¡v~/7Z J ~ C· Y Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEG CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS _. ,By: ~D1~~ ·'IT: I· I I I II I Ie I I H I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I I Ie I IN FORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AN D CITY COUNCIL No. IR 88-38 Date: September 26, 1988 Subject: 1987-88 Miscellaneous Water and Sewer Improvements _ Presentation of Plans The staff would like to present the subject plans to Council and get their informal approval to proceed with advertisement for bids. Attached is a letter from the consulting City Engineer describing any "zingers" that the staff felt the Council should be apprised of. Respectfully submitted, (!) ciJl~ " Gregory,W~ Direc to'£ r i í / GWD/ ds/' q v¿~ Works/Utilities ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I I Ie I , KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 20, 1988 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Vorks City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-561, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MISC. VATER AND SEYER IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL Ve are requesting that the referenced project be placed on the September 26, 1988, Pre-Council Meeting Agenda for Council consideration of approval of the construction plans. Transmitted herewith is one (I) blueline set of the construction plans. This project includes construction of water and sewer system improvements at four (4) locations in the City of North Richland Hills. Ve understand that all easements and permits required for construction of this project have been acquired except as noted below. The following is a list of the facilities included in this project along with estimated costs: VATER AND SEVER SYSTEM PROJECTS ESTIM. COST 1. Kirk Lane 8-Inch Yater Line from Rumfield to Precinct 2. Crane Road 12-Inch V.L. from Martin to Amundson 3. Holder Estates S.S. Line from Northfield Park to Davis 4. Vance/Daley/Cummings 6-Inch San. Sewer Lines $ 18,000 89,790 45,990 17,520 Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 219,000 The following schedule is suggested: Council Approve Plans First Advertisement Date Second Advertisement Date Open Bids September 26, 1988 (Pre-Council) October 18, 1988 October 25, 1988 November 1, 1988 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I, I I I I I I Ie I September 20, 1988 PLANS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL Page 2 Council Award Contr. Pre-Construction Conf. York Order Date Estimated Completion Date November 14, 1988 December 7, 1988 December 19, 1988 June 19, 1989 (Regular Meeting) (6 Months) The following is a list of "zingers" and other items for the Council's information: 1. The Kirk Lane 8-Inch water line will be constructed entirely within the existing right-of-way of Kirk Lane from Rumfield to Precinct Line Road between the existing pavement and the north fence line. This main will replace an existing old and undersized 2-inch water line. Improved water pressure and distribution in the northeast part of the City will be accomplished. 2. The Crane Road I2-inch water main will replace an existing old and undersized 2-inch water main from Martin Drive to Amundson Drive. Pressures and distribution will be improved in the Glenann Addition, Nob Hill Addition, Valley Park Estates, and Stoneybrook Addition. Construction of the I2-inch water main will be in the east parkway between the existing asphalt pavement and the east right-of-way line. 3. The Holder Estates sanitary sewer line will start at the Little Bear 27-inch outfall line located in the Northfield Park and proceed northward across the future Yilson Lane, then up Timber Drive to Davis Blvd. The original plan was to provide sewer service for all homes on Timber Drive along with additional capacity to serve the entire watershed area tributary to the connection point on the Little Bear outfall line. However, due to grade problems and excessive cuts required, the proposed Holder Estates sewer main will terminate about 300 feet south of Davis Blvd. Two homes on Timber Drive will not be served by this line near Davis Blvd. These two homes, along with future customers along Davis Blvd. as the area develops, will be better served by a future sewer line extension along Davis Blvd. from the 27-inch outfall main at Cherokee Trail. 4. Proposed 6-inch sanitary sewer lines between Vance and Cummings and between Cummings and Daley will provide City service to homes which are presently on septic tanks. Most of the property owners are anxious to tie onto the proposed new lines, but some are not. The proposed sewer lines will be located along the backyards of these property owners in an existing 10-foot wide easement, but some trees and other landscape structures will have to be removed. Temporary fences will be set up about 20-feet from the proposed sewer lines in I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I, I I I I I I Ie I September 20, 1988 PLANS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL Page 3 each back yard. Temporary construction easements have not been acquired for this temporary fencing, therefore permission from each property owner will be required to obtain the working room necessary by the contractor to construct the sewer lines. If formal temporary construction easement documents are prepared, this could delay the project for quite some time. Guidance from the Council on how to proceed is requested. Attached is a list of all the affected property owners who need to be contacted for permission to move construction equipment into their back yards. Please call if you have any questions. úJ~ RICHARD V. ALBIN, P.E. RYA/lld/Enclosures cc. Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. Mark Bradley, R.O.V. Agent I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I I Ie I MISCELLANEOUS 1987 WATER & SEVER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (VANCE/CUMMINGS 6" SANITARY SEWER LINE) RESIDENTS OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ADDITION: HOME TELEPHONE NUMBERS: 1. Floyd E. Peavler 4216 Vance Fort Vorth, Texas 76180 485-7643 (Block 2, Lot 1) 2. Roy Brooks 7008 Manor Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76180 281-5025 (Block 2, Lot 2) 3. Harvey E. Williams 7016 Manor Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76180 281-8141 (Block 2, Lot 3) 4. Mrs. Vomack 4125 Cummings Dr. V. Fort Worth, Texas 76180 485-2332 (Block 2, Lot 4) 5. Mr. Cecil B. Hollingsworth 4121 Cummings Dr. V. Fort Vorth, Texas 76180 281-3631 (Block 2, Lot 5) 6. Mr. Charles T. Tackett 4117 Cummings Dr. V. Fort Worth, Texas 76180 281-3248 (Block 2, Lot 6) 7. Robert J. Hejnicki 4113 Cummings Dr. HOME: 485-6229 Fort Worth, Texas 76180 YORK: 834-2851 (Block 2, Lot 7) 8. Mr. Gary K. Rangel 4109 Cummings Dr. W. Fort Yorth, Texas 76180 281-6465 (Block 2, Lot 8) 9. Marcus Newberry 4105 Cummings Dr. Fort Worth, Texas 76180 281-3405 (Block 2, Lot 9) 1 Ie I 1 1 1 1 I I Ie I, I I I I I I Ie I MISCELLANEOUS 1987 YATER & SEYER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (VANCE/CUMMINGS 6" SANITARY SEYER LINE) RESIDENTS OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ADDITION: HOME TELEPHONE NUMBERS: 10. Mr. Archie L. Moore 4101 Cummings Dr. Fort Yorth, Texas 76180 (Block 2, Lot 10) 11. Mr. Archie L. Moore 4101 Cummings Dr. Fort Worth, Texas 76180 (Block 2, Lot 11) Vacant 12. Mr. J.R. Schomerus 4104 Vance Rd. Fort Worth, Texas 76180 (Block 2, Lot 12) 13. Mr. Alvin H. Beasley, Jr. 4108 Vance Rd. Fort Yorth, Texas 76180 (Block 2, Lot 13) 14. Thomas & Susan Speight 4112 Vance Rd. North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 (Block 2, Lot 14) 15. Cecil D. Raglin 4116 Vance Rd. Fort Worth, Texas 76180 (Block 2, Lot 15) 16. Ms. Geraldine Cox 4204 Vance Rd. Fort Yorth, Texas 76180 (Block 2, Lot 16) 17. John P. Admire 4208 Vance Rd. Fort Yorth, Texas 76180 (Block 2, Lot 17) 18. Mr. Russell G. Nay 4212 Vance Rd. Fort Yorth, Texas 76180 (Block 2, Lot 18) 485-1170 485-1170 281-2398 281-8907 281-4414 498 - 1436 581-8826 WORK: 498-1910 281-4726 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I I Ie I MISCELLANEOUS 1987 VATER & SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (CUMMINGS/DALEY 6" SANITARY SEWER LINE) RESIDENTS OF HOME NORTH RICHLAND TELEPHONE HILLS ADDITION: NUMBERS: 1 . Clare Poland May 4124 Cummings Dr. Y. Fort Worth, Texas 76180 281-3673 (Block 3, Lot 6) 2. Donald & Diane McQuary 4120 Cummings Dr. W. Fort Worth, Texas 76180 656-9212 (Block 3, Lot 7) 3. W.J. Williams 4116 Cummings Dr. Y. Fort Yorth, Texas 76180 281-1654 (Block 3, Lot 8) 4. Lindel Carey 4112 Cummings Dr. W. Fort Worth, Texas 76180 Unlisted (Block 3, Lot 9) 5. John M. Dubose, Jr. 4108 Cummings Dr. W. Fort Worth, Texas 76180 281-5009 (Block 3, Lot 10) 6. Ernst V. Sims 4109 Daley Ave. P.O. Box 18672 Fort Worth, Texas 76180 281-2144 (Block 3, Lot 15) 7. Charles H. Redmond 4115 Daley Ave. Fort Worth, Texas 76180 281-3428 (Block 3, Lot 16) 8. Effie Juanita Burnett 2708 S. Kingsbury Fort Vorth, Texas 76180 284-0503 (Block 3, Lot 17) , .... - --- - Franklin Court ß-IncJ Sever Line (kJOT I tJ TH It;, ~;JTtZ ÷ " " "" City of leller r- . - , Continental Trail 6-Inc*~er Lin~ .. . (~OT ~ r~l~ C-oJJTeAc.T') I· 4 ~ ~;/]_ -~ Bursey load I lit L If. _. DIWI~i &1 er Dt~n1h Sevel'~~Re I -- -..: .- ~: ~1~ ~~ =': ~ ~~:,,' _ ; ~~;]-;;,-,,.. ~:~~.~ r~ at.- Li ~ ,~.:"v~- - ~~~,¡;. -!--"I~;§ ~ _1. ~l;.~~;~rz ~ \..\, \',. . ' ~ ,-~ " - .." ¡;; - ~ ~ - "~~'I F-'~ ~=":~, . , .. ~,-,- '~,.. ~- ',-, 1.1:' I ~'~-~. '~'~ì~~f:J ~~~~d1i;~~-fr.~~ p. ?~,~ -=~ ':;X.j;r, ~ \--f;t\' = ~' -~u~1 ;~:- /';\}~i ==!!D_~-=,"",~ ~_~_ E'- ~_. lJ::J/' ~,\ 40.' ,._. --~~ ·;':1~ ~-:-~ :::;;:i~ f'~~- -,." -{:-: _ '_.,' ..-t ~_. ~~ , _.J._-__---- -.. '-j t ---- "'" ,>¡-.a: _ ·~\).1.:.,1'~,~ ~¡..: fi][ßÏ ~~:~ =; :p ~~~_. ~"'~. ~~.'=_~~~/, _~ I '. "~ '1. · ~ '-'-' ... 11.. . " ::..:---=--Q ~ L -:_ _ _, ,~. .~ =-. ~~'~, ' _, , ~ :;~tj'. õ(lÏ!iaura ~ ~ .. _~~~ ~~~n_ D~~ "-J-~ :" - t~:~:i\:...i~¡"; , .,~. · --.J''l ~. ,'1."':=": . -.~ ~)~-~ Cra~ R.ða'¡' ~~']j{~h--wa'ter (.If~ to ~ -. I...· 'f' r ;;.- - ~... Þ.. -. ~ _.- r--- '~~ · ¡,.r, "\ .'- ,. I.t:ut: ." .:.. - .' ~---~ s:.\:.~ _. ~~ ·f1:-fJ~ - .. _".. ~~~a : II · ";- ~ I,' I~'" ',' ~.ß :, .. _~.'. L_~,.....::õ& G. ~ ",~~:"'. -: " \ ,_ "... -.- - --a...... , ~ . _ .~ :~it - ;;; " j5 :~ ...;~ · \ 3 ~- '1 MISC. 1981 VATER AND SEVER IMPROVEMENTS ....... en - . --., . ,;: . - -=-r~/~ 11_-"" _~~-:, 1 .-... -.. 1_·,. ,...- ,_ .:' JJ- I __ ~'_~' I \~ ., . <:.' - --.;: ~ - I~_;' , M5·.Ã-· .'~ ~. - ...';~ ,....-.. I: i ~ -1- ._~ ,-, ~ ., . -, ... .... ::> r'---=:- .c 4. i ~ ~ ~ i . 'Q ....~;_--i , þ . Q I ·1 CO ", _YI , ~~ :: : - I :-. To ç I 1.8. 820.. _ _ Total Estimated Cost. $ 219,000 ~....., -- :c 2 j' - -- - :;-.:"r~"·T~-rr-.:. ~ '~" \. ",U' J. -_" :, -~' · :--,. I' . :/.1 L ,'.!, - ~'---! '-', 1_ ~'-~.~ C " ,\. \ Y'~ - -:!. ... ~ ,'- .'. ,,'''' . I :o¡. ~~ ¿ '. (\'~ -.. - . =-. -.:'~,~:-~J r -~~ · .,',. _ :~=-~::'I~.n.!...I,1 ~~ ~ I ¡ 7,. ·-.=~,~f1¡:'--rr[.-..·.~, ~,~"7~ ~ . Q 'v '- -' _. - ~ =::1 'I I. .~- -==:J~:v.ñCe7ª~~~$' 6 - IDCh- ~--=' , \ · -~ 1---'" ~ '4-~ _._ \ ;::I:~: ~. .: ~·~=-*e........,.~t~-:~ -". C-. BaltH City \ . .~' - ";~=~-.;i~-' JCle..nvi'v-DDiv' ß.Inch Sever Line \lj·::~ ',~ .f'~'/-·t;.::~-!'I~~ -. - J ÑOT; I ~ I~ COo.1T/2AGT) ~ ~ ~ -1- :ïi : "1 ~ ... ",'0 City of 11ehland BUb ~' .- I. L- ~~,~I- ~.- -= ~ t~,· ~~. i · - , --~ . '. -, _~.. . , . --. .. / --:'; . . - "..': ';-' ~ .'~ - ~.4, , . 1 \. : ! .!. I."~V h ..." Ila I. f -' - ~ . , ~& . , , ~~ I ."A...., I ~. . ..' v<'· ,~ :;; ! I I I I I I l- I' I I 'I I I ~, ~ . ~ ~ .. IÞ C o .., c t! ~ Kirk Lane a-Inch Vater Line ~ Crane Road 12-Inch Vater Line v Vance/DaleY/Cummings 6-Inch Sever Lines NO Glenview Drive a-Inch Sewer Line NO Denton Highway a-Inch Relief Sewer Line ~ Holder Estates a-Inch Sewer Line ~O-Contlnental Trail 6-Inch Sewer Line ~O-Pranklln Court a-Inch Sewer Line CIn or NORTS IICBLAND BILLS, TlXAS I ~ + ( ) CJ/~ ".. ~ ~~ ., - ~~ « '" I \- .. . '" C) ~ :! : I CI' .. ~ I '.. ___ to- e #' . I ", ;t~~ ~ ~ ~ II. ~ ~ . . ..J : ~ v 112 Z 8 - '" .- .... ~ V ..J ~ :1 ,., ~ ù ~ I ~ > ..... A. ."j co § . 0\ ~"" .... . :Û { ~ ü ... ~ Q ':! .... CI) Ie ... .... .... . V at ~ z: w co ... - ~~~ ...i ,. ~~ .~ ... + ~ ; ~ , , I I I , l- I , , , , , ~- ~ ~ C·-'K T.,~ ... '/' ,.~~u~ > .' TI _1 'I: ~. · .. . ~ '. '·:irt·....· ,4 " ~~- J ' ~r ~ L:. '"i:' ~ t; : T. ,.. , ~ .. · ~' ) 4 10 \\..l' 4· IS r J," r, , " ' J b "'I J t , ~'..... . ." '- 5 ~~' ~4Þ~ f , I ... a . 'f'.. ~ -4 r J ~ ., , , II ' IIa II 1. I - ---. -.:. ~.. ... . ~~ ~I -=---= ~ A':"r- ... ....IM.... r .. ~.., ~ ~. I!' ~ j. ~ .::'" ,'I ..-;¡, I '~~=;r :-..- r·· ·:·~~:-I ,.., ·..·1:;- I -'L-= J · ~.~/ . '., . : "T~¿t5.~,- -~ 1..: '-I. X/·IiT. B" W-L .--~- - .. '0 '''1.,- Tg7M ...&.<.1: If o !..I "J~ ,.. ,. ~ e.: 1 ,.. T. I). (~. .., ... T. ... IS ~ 51 t ~ ~ · CD ...., Q · C. " · .... .. ... \J 'TR #;P~..;..~ : 4t' ~ ,.. 'Z~ r ... 6&. ,.- . . '_ ~ - Jf.~ \'"'1 . ~. 'S A.c ".. j . - r_ 'tI : D - -...- '9. · .. "n:r "Z~ C'" .. ~~ .,. , t. - -.JI. ... ''!.!.., .< ,~WI. TrI "" !' L..-. - I A. ';. ..;-7w "11': ~ : ; ~ .J 7 "'-¡~, ' 111. 'os 4c S.I.4&. "'it I.~ , ~ I '.. '" '~. . ~:.':' f ~~. · ; ~;-, ~ ~ .. ' 'T. '2 &.. ,w ,_".. :. ~ L.I..... ...... A.& . L ! Ta ,.: + "g.. ~ TR ~ - . ~ .N....·... .re, ...... ~I .......:.'~~ 1..~.... ,..." I ,. 'i \~.C:~Ttþ ~ :~ ~~; \.. ~ T. 'l ': ", U. T. :. I.'..., ~ .. "'- !f 2 ..~ ...1 Ij'I J"'~ I~ . '2.... = . "'~ .Jl.I.,~..., n~ · ..., I., þ.~. ~ ~~ .,.. 1 _........ 11111 ... .:¡ :"of "-.. ", ~ ...:, ... ..., To ~ .., .... .' 1J vi ' T'" 9"" \" .... -j ...tP \ ~ T R'~' ~ r: ';;' :-: ~ · ,..: 1It... ; I ,.... ~~~. .. ..0' .,~~ ~ e~" . 1.tN41tC. JJ'fat :\ (0.~,""" ~ . ......... V I ~ 10. at .'.:-- \ .. ~ ~ ..,.. I ~ oJ eo: '- ~ I () 1L!a.. i--:>L- " .. ~;-....: ,.. S~."'4.1T 000..... ., l~' [... ,. ~~~ '~~ ~ ..i q ~~:.. ,..... !'" : ...:: :-:-1, " eL.. F TO ." ..~.." ....1"..,... ;' '. , ~ sa ~ f\, 'U.. .u.. 'i. 14- ... \ 2... . ' 'I!' .... : 5 , !!Ii ~ "" ,..~. ~ ... · · I~.. . .. .... OT', 18. ..- ~ . r ¡:: ;: ù '.oCl ~ T. ..... .'. '/.0'1)' ., , . · '-~51~ 1 ~. ...'~. -\ .... .J??-.'i ~ : - t ~~''''':J'':. ".. ...... ~. ~~y~.~ :0 :.-¡.~': ~ . \ 1~.~~ ~ ~ ð' ~ ~ ~. .... ~ \) 0 ~_r r '] .. #.... , _.;....::. .. V'~ 1 t.c ~ ~o J? ~ ~. 0\ 0 .-.. t.. i .. II · .. ~1'2; 21~1A 'l~ "'..... .. ..... '\ ,-b~ ~ .: 'Z ;.5,,; - II: - ...-. 'eþl~~ .~ IØ .~ 0" -. I ~ "._~ ., .-. -. ~... 8 '"'. Ü ~ c: .....~ 1"- .~01 ~ " ! ,. ~ II 11 . ",'I~I'\t I', ".,,,, -.. ..~ ,G]~~ 4,: ~ ð :. ~ Ii ~ "'~I ~~~~fJf!ffff: ,. ......;.,-~ 11ID~4T" &0. ~ 'I ...... ~"'l~ 3:ø \\I It I · t .......~ · )..... f ~ ~ \.:.. < ~J~~ ,{ ;.¡~'~.~'~ -þ. ..~;. :. g~~~~ ;: I" ~ !?~ ~,: ;::~:~ ~I~ - · ;~~1: . t I"' 4: S 6. 'lJ ~ M t t't-., .., ". .--..... · .. ..' 22... . 2A:' --'- ..2' ... I:. ti ~ T.. t ,~ I j õõ~....-..,. þ.. - ......, ~~R'~... otL ';: 2. . ~5 ;' :~ ~ ~" to IS ~ 20 ~ ' "11 ~ I~ I ~ ~ '!f<~ fI,rYr:?\' ~L1 , "," .......' .' ~,., ". I.. ..f" .. 1 ~ _ ~ ~ ~ " " t4 I ~ 4' ,,2 ~ ~ £ - L.a...a.. .... II . _ . L'''' . '10 ,.,: 2IÞ: ~ 3. tØ ~ ~ ~ .. ' ~ - , ;a-- 't. \ · · ~ -:-1 .. ... I f :¡. ti.. -;: I 0<' ,;-- v '-;;- __ ~""';-:;! . .... ~ .-' ~ T1I K ;~~~ 0--- 5'.. I, ,~~ I'.' ~~, ._...' - - - -. ø;- - ~ .,,~ '; ~ ,.~,.~ II 'I : '2& ~ ~. : ~~ ,; I. 'Ie · ., I )-11~ :,... ~ ~ _ ~ _ ... ~~~" ,f'" i-- ,~ ~l~f 'I II .. ... j : A ~ .:-.'~ I' ~ '1, S5 '1 ~' ~ ~ . , 10·11 .. ~ ~ '1 ........ 4' B' ~ 1 -+ ., ~ ' ~ · '''"'-: ~. ., .. · · · - k ., ~ n -, ,..-..w.. .s ~ H.. ~.J'2 ·0) .4.' ,t l~~ I~; '" '. .1-. I' ....:s.J ,.: fS': ,. V 5· ...5 TIt ~ u~ ~. ~~.' 14 ~ ., ' ~ ,_ .., 1..-,:' - ~:J.:' ~ --:~. .- :.:~..,.: i ¡'.... iÎ 4.. ~ to u - ::..:.;- ..: ~ .~ ... 10 .,. '1.. ",' .... ~' .. ~ ". ... t~ ' ~: ~,~._.),. J.J ì T. t l' .. ., ., ,.. ~ 2, ... ..~ .~ ". \ I .. .. 't " J. \ II ,4 : 15 ~~;.;, ~~.12'1"25 : ~.~. ~ ( ,.' I z... - ". ~' I. l 'l ~I J ¡ .' j ~ ~I ~J:~ I; "'- I ". ~ ~ ... ~,g~ ~2 _ ~1 1, ea ~ _ . t. ~O~~"'Q OIl - ¡ ., ~ v. L6"( . - · .. , 11. .-!-:.~ ~ l...... r'" f .. r-:;:-- ~ ",. ,. ~ ... ~L VI 'III Of _:.")~ ~..;,:J.> ~~~~I~II'~k' I.. ..,.,,_____ 2.T.....~':" .;-1 ¡:Z l~ ~ .-.... i I s .,J )1 I ~ L~_-·.. .J . ". 51"¡ IS ~ t-rl .,. A4·:: -..-; IL [ .. I .....J ~ .. ~~ Ir"'-"'~J ~ O~ ./.'- ~ ,.~. e : ~ ;'5 .¿,~:. ~ ~ it . ., : ~ JZ " i . .. 8..·.. ~ ,-!, . t.. . ~ . "., ,.. ~ 4 ...1It' - ~ r2 : œ~o. . ~ : " .t', \l' ...; ~ ~.-:-- e -,..-- · ok ~. ~~() _ ...-.... . ; ~..--;; it) ~ · '-2. > ~ . :;,..- - ~i~- -: J Q' I; 1;;~w;;ij.~~'¥tIO: ~ . . I H Ii ~ ." . :... t: ~ C1 " l. ...cO "i....JP~.-;.;. ~ ." .. ~ Ta ~ , C; ,... ~ ... , ~ ___ .,.. '0' ~_..... ' . ~ L · ~ Il./L ... ::Iè ~ ,,~~ ~. ~-' 'TiA ~ #; J/. 7T --:u...r.. "J' T. ~., '"'' I --- L~ rQ' L.-' ~ .~~ -- '* 1F ~:. I ~~k, ~ _ '.4 T. nAW ,. , T1I TO ------- ---- - -'Ac 1'101 "0'2. 1'207 n, Tat? It .,a I ~,." 1 "'cl. 'tIC " Ac J '2' ~ .:,. C. '"7 T~ ~. Iyf I~ ~ ... C ..,. ~ .~~,'>. -: .," J ;f'L ~ ~.'.: r - "T1I4 ,. .. ..., . ~ 111 '241 ,... " ~4' ~ 1 t... , A. .. .... 4 '., ~', ' ~. . . ~ " ..' T ! T. J.! ,. ~. ,.. . . ".. ....... .. "" J I I. I I I I I I I a- I' I I I I , I L J, .~ ~ . ¡. 1- ~J I ... ____I ~ ï~~· 1F 1 6 u' ~' u. ~ &_1.:.. 1 , . , ~ .. 1.-' I J....:. - r.,~~ ~ l.· '. ,J" Je~. I ..I... ~ ~ t) . . : ~ .' J J.. ,- ~ I.. 4 I· ~ I h ~ J . . '. . :. . 1·· I ~ ~ ~ · ~ ~ ~ ' i a , ,~ ~ ? ' ~ _ 1 ~~ . ~ : \n . : ", . ·~'1\~ ffi~ 1 J,J~. 's ~ 1 ,> ~ 0' ,',: J ~ (~ ("~ I P¿ _~þ,JO It þ.. oJ! . , t. , it 'A~ - -:-- ~ ~, ...... r;:: r ~. p. . I. ... ... , ,. ....;' '--7 ~.þ' ~ "I.. n.. ...., -- t ~ ~ ~ aa~ 1. - ... ~ , . ..... . )6 a 11 (d % , :0 '. t--- . ".r'. 0 " ~;) .-. i ~, J . . J ~ J ~. II .. G.. ~_ . a¡ I. f .~ "" ~ r .. , ~'L;. ,^, ~~~~ ~ ~~ .t:> .:'.,.---- · ~ .........-- " t II ·0 '0 .. . . . , . ....1 ..... ..".. ~ e ; 'I ,- ~ .---~ ~..::.. ~ ~~.. . .~ - I .. '.' ¡¡ I . I. · ~.. ::-. II 12 S A' ; , ~ J 1:- - . T ow ~.l. .. 's .. · 1 '- '1 r , 1 ~1 I"~ ( ~'-,..~ ~;..' ~ '1'~ ~}O~ toO 1,0 ,~ .. '. ~ I ~l~ · '6 ~ .. [ ,r £It'f ... J O~ J . ~ 4 l' t . If 0 c. . .; 14 ~ I '. -\,. , ... L.S ") ;>: . ~c.. 'I (~;.. . I, · V ~~, '·/¡^"<¿'7~~ , , I. II . ex ~ ~ ~ V ., - ~~"'~ '~~·VÄ~I~X·~~~ -4 ..,~ - - -J ,. .., , ~1 ~~ ---- Hh .. ~ ~ .!. ~ .t..." . .' ., 10" S ~~ lfC_ ~. r---. ~ ü-~_i~r ~ ' e~' Þ--' ~.~ r ..J..- ," ' ~¡ · <~1";;: . .. . ~ILLL q ~ ~ ~ I~ .. J ~ .~~~ '¥) , .,. .. - ~ ~ . 'I ~ ' .. 1~ I ". · I . -. ... ,.." m~I:E~~ w.~ I ~ _" '0: ~ ..- .'.!.:.::!.. f1IV 1>11 _ _ S. .. ""C ., till vAltACI S£!. ~ . I'D' -:- ----: .:- -. ; I" £1"" -r - '\.. 6 )iÎS To I ~ M ~... - ~ ~ ,.., ~ . A t to i ~ ~ ,~ P'ILI...tto.1 "''® ~ Ta.c ~ /:(#: ..;T s t !-t\k w, ,,' \.~) "~t, ~ ..,~ ~.."., I I fW ... ~\@ - ~ * lOt ~-.JfIt' . « ~ ~ .. u ~ 0 tll~1,.; ~.. . \'>~, ~ _.~- ... ~ ..n ....~ . .. JY: i:;z~ ~';')~ .,.~ .. . . . .. ~ ..¡.; t ~ , 'I "I I~ ~ _ _1: . . , ~ ..... ~ _~ eC. .. ~ I. .. 7~, raMI ~.... I. & ¡ ./ AI "\. ~ , a 3-561 MISC. 1987 VATER AND SIVER IMPROVEMENTS . . VANCE/DALBY/CUMMINGS SEVER EXTENSIONS Line "A" Line "B" Line "C" L1ne "D" 6" D1.., PVC, 810 L.P. 6" D1.., PVC, 215 L.r. 6" D1.., pve, 120 L.r. 6" Di.., PVC, 439 L.r. ,~ r ~ -~- - = ~ .. ...~.I t ., " , ., ~ ~ "- ,~ .. .J C ~ 0 ,1 '. . , a. '. 'II . ., ~ -ltl- ..c I I.r ~ : ~ If': ~ VI; î : f ~c .. V , " OJ~ ... J I . - ...- J _.1 J ,. I .. r '" eJ I I . T I~ 1 o. \.. l . . i ...i. eD .. ~ .' r-~ 11 I. , . .. :.. r..: toa . ". "'. ..-- TUlltlÆt ., ~,~ -- '0 " " II . I. I. I / ;1, i ~r~ ~.. ,~Ir~"~ ~ 1'1~.' rJ : , ~ 'A ~.. ~ ~ ~ar ,tJ THle; .. I · L Ccf.IŒþ..(,T -t__ ..t~h ~ ..~, ,..a ~~ ø :~ "AlA l~ ~~~ V -~ 1I~. / wz. ~ -~~ -:; li~,~",~._~~ .- ... r ..., . I. .z ,. . II ...¡., I J '" .. .., ... '.. "1 "I ~" ~. ~. .. It· ~, I' , ~.I #' I. _ i \ ~. , ~ .~ ..- ,") ~~ " , ~. ,~ ~I' ..~ ~i ~ .. ". .. "I .. ~ J ~ '8 .. 1 10 - '-~ ~ '- '- '- ~ , , , , , " , , " .,...,...:....-..._.t"~~ :-...". 1a ~ . A,.. ,. .,~ ""4c 1Jl ... ~ '2 A.c. . TQ .,~~ .... .. .. "u.c.,. e 6 p ~Ç1f- \'0@Þ .' :1 ~\E. -{4 ¡ "O~ 'P. .~ CD I 0Iit.1IC QIDð£. L.II,I .,. .. . 0 6~~ ". :.>~. .~ . Jù~" - ~;/t'4¿L " . S'~~ MISC. 1987 VATER AND SEVER IMPROVEMENTS BOLDER ESTATES SEVER SYSTEM EXTENSION ,... II. . '1 #4c. + " : . '1 . t. ... s.'- ... Ita 3·561 ,,. . 8" DI.., PVC, 2,420 L.r. 11 I'ZA... .,.. "D U.54S Ac. ,., A. f'Jo~ TJ-J f= , ~ LD t:> ~ C3. i'- --'2A 1,.2 .,. Taft J. k-'c. I. . A.. TQ 154, , 0 ... . ~~ T'",'.." ;II.. ~ T. 'AI. Jo .., "c.. KaoWILL. + ,~ ,.... J'__. , LeE ~oØOMA ,J .............. ............ ~ ~ I '" ~ """"--- --.......... ~.' C' ~ 0 At! ........-. ---.... '- -.....---. -............. - ',- __ "" ~Â4 -- __ .' <i . t'. .. -.....---. ~ A... .., EN Þ 5 þ:'(),J ___ _____ ----- ----- .. . - ~ _Oi., ~ 'I' . '~'. , '1 '54'2- I. t~~t. /'.... \., ",j +\ /. I Ie I I I I I I I II I· I I I I I I I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 88-39 Date: September 26, 1988 Subject: 1988 Miscellaneous Street Reconstruction and Repair Project - Presentation of Plans The staff would like to present the subject plans to Council and get their informal approval to proceed with advertisement for bids. Attached is a letter from the consulting City Engineer describing any "zingers" that the staff felt the Council should be apprised of. Respectfully submitted, (,1 ~ ,,¿],i¿, ~t Gregory ~:' ns, Director' 0 1ic Works/Utilities , / L// GWD/ds ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I. Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 20, 1988 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-347, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MISC. STREET & DRAINAGE PLANS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL Ye are requesting that the referenced project be placed on the September 26, 1988, Pre-Council Meeting Agenda for Council consideration of approval of the construction plans. Transmitted herewith is one (1) blueline set of the construction plans. This project includes reconstruction of six (6) streets with new curb and gutter, asphalt pavement and underground storm drainage as required. Also included in this project is curb and gutter repair and replacement on six (6) additional streets.· Ye would note that new sidewalks are not budgeted or included in any of these streets. However, replacement of existing sidewalks, as required, is included. The following is a list of the streets included in this project along with estimated costs: RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ESTIM. COST 1. Yillowcrest from Tourist to South City Limits 2. Richland Plaza Drive from Billye Faye to Broadway 3. Mackey Drive from Riviera to South Dead End 4. Terry Drive from College Circle to Circle Drive South 5. Crabtree Lane from Turner to the North Dead End 6. Payte Lane from Turner to the North Dead End $ 218,000 198,000 150,000 80,000 125,000 135,000 Paving Costs (Utilities not included) $ 906,000 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 20, 1988 PLANS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL Page 2 REPAIR PROJECTS 1. Little Ranch Road at Dana 2. 4900 Lariat Trail 3. Marilyn Lane from Redondo to Canton 4. 7617 Teresa Court 5. 7112 Jeffrey Court 6. Little Ranch at Sean Drive 4,600 14,000 18,000 9,000 7,400 14,500 Total Estimated Repair Cost $ 67,500 The following schedule is suggested: Council Approve Plans First Advertisement Date Second Advertisement Date Open Bids Council Award Contr. Pre-Construction Conf. York Order Date Estimated Completion Date September 26, 1988 (Pre-Council) October 12, 1988 October 19, 1988 October 26, 1988 November 14, 1988 (Regular Meeting) December 7, 1988 December 19, 1988 October 19, 1989 (10 Months) The following is a list of "zingers" and other items for the Council's information: 1. Only existing sidewalk, which is in conflict with proposed curb and gutter grades is being replaced under this contract. No new sidewalk is proposed for those parkway areas which presently do not have sidewalk. None of the streets included in this project are located adjacent to any schools. 2. Solid sodding with Bermuda or St. Augustine is provided for all parkways which are disturbed during construction operation.s. 3. Yater lines are being replaced on all street reconstruction projects except on Richland Plaza Drive. Only a short water line segement exists at Richland Plaza Drive near Billye Faye Drive. All proposed water line replacements will be located under the new pavement to avoid conflict with other existing underground utilities except in Crabtree and Payte. On these two streets, the proposed water lines will be located in the west parkway behind the curb. Only a few existing trees and schrubs in these parkways will be disturbed. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 20, 1988 PLANS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL Page 3 5. An underground "french" drain is proposed along Yillowcrest Drive just behind the curb and gutter in the west parkway. This perforated subdrain is provided to help protect the pavement subgrade by intercepting the ground water flow before it passes under the street. Ye are not aware of any ground water problems which may exist on any of the other streets included in this project. Some of the rock walls and other landscape structures which extend out into the right-of-way may be disturbed during construction of the proposed french drain. 6. Plans will be submitted to all the other utility companies for their review and identification of any potential conflicts with their existing or future facilities. Ye do not anticipate any conflicts, however, since we are replacing existing curb and gutter and paving at about the same location and grade. 7. Asphalt pavement is proposed on all streets because of the cheaper construction costs and convenience to adjacent property owners. Local residents can drive on new asphalt streets sooner than they can on concrete streets. Please call if you have any questions. ~~ RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E. RYA/lld/Enclosures cc. Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance I Ie I City of Keller . ; ~~~------l ....J J -..-' ~: !: L..-. - ---~= -=-- ~ ;.:~-:-:..=- ~~ =====' ,..... ........ ,., --, =t~¿ ~ ~~; I r ~ 1- .. _H ~1ïL.J¡ /' 1= ª ~~~. --~ _. -." ; ~~~~~ ~-- ==~" ~~ ~ ¡¡''l~~¡~¡: ~ M:~ ' ~ rJ~~~; ~'~I ci - ~;..~ ~:-I ~ ~¿~~-- I ~ ~~--~~- rr ~~_ I?¿~~.;._~~ :-- ~~~~ I;;;E -: ~~¡;p.~U~.; ~,.. ~~Q:-:-=:_ ~i ~]~~ ~~~f 1.~ . . ~~~ ." ~ :::-c£"-fl-; - f~...-a~~La~~ø~~, 1~ ,:-:=:3- ~ ~'£ - - ~p ~___ - -- ._~ '.x." ~J1ti ~~~;:t ~'ty~~ ._,it~ 2\.~J~_;::~~]? '" :.£ --.---r:._.¡;:;;;;;..[ to'"-=-= ~.. .~ ¡:- - -~ :-::-~=~~ -.=: . ---_ - ~. .,." .-_ I! ;,'.-:.--.€. _ fJ t1p_ ~~. ~1::-- ~ ~f L' -...~- . .--- -~-~;, -=; '-=:;-,-~{ -'~1g 5 ~ . :r r1~g cha¡ll.aïï- Drive'1'tJ - '-' r-- -- - - ~::~, -~::;ï;-fi"i.i -- .- III ,.,_ _ _ , __ -- ~·~-~%ili:;~~~~;~~~~:;~C~..riFt~ -~1~--~t: . .- - . -',. I '.; 'II' , r. -, t '" x_ - ..' ;;;, r: .;;;' 0 'I ~,. ,.... - . ~ . ~ ' r_'.: ·\...·f-_.;._·.,'~.;;;... -' ~... ,'" "'t.~ .-. '_ ...-.': - ~ - .;;,"~. If;: .!i:.', _ _~. /ø' ~~ :'".-, _. ~~--: . _ __ _ - .'.., I ~~ ~ ·c.~__ ....... , ~ ..,...4' _ _ . ;;;; ~ ./:~ ~ =._ "~_ ~ -'-I~ '. I. i_j- ·"I~~·.., . .- .-~- ---;-:.. __...:' --:._ Terry Drive r'-'-=,- M:i"7-., ~1" --;;'::'~~=". , -- _..:.a. ., /" 4_ __ j\ft II - \ ~t I~~~¿ ·:~~~tJ.:;.~. '.~ I - .' it· ..,.. '_'"""7- -.i r£~'~~':.t. . ~l ~ .J / Q ~ I ," -. t ,~.''; ~~: . .....-t-:-;=.. --I -.-' ',~ ~_~. - .. 0-,·. - . .... -...._ Ii'. -.- i 0 I'i.r ~ --'~.. -... -¡ __e. .J '. .. \' \ i ;,- -- _ -:--- I --. I.' L·· I t f · ."~ -..1 ~ -.. . - , _ _~.:.. Î i · i 2-" i·. _ ,u. =- e-::.~ ':..:e~' ,¡ -I~ .-. -' _. · '-:-7. · J ' - t I'=' =i-f."::: -::;=;--;";"ï' ~ ~. .' .: r · L..., I.B, 820 --_. _ _ ·lli r.J~.IÓ" .:~ ~L':'-;"_':", ':-,1 ..' -f ~I 1.\1 / -- ------..., ~~,.. \1:' .J~ - -- ..... eeV 'J . '. -:: 1--- '."'O'~h ~ ': '\_ \....;.1_' : > ---" , i .. ./' ¡ \ ,-.:- .....Y'...I__ :;.___'-!.~.I...J. "".·-;...,'.1 ~: '¡;,' .' ; -. -!. , ;;. ,I ~.- ð~'- ,... ~ ,. ("~ _·,._~~.~--:__-=-~i~_ ~~ -.t. _ ~'-:~:'I:.IICU I I ~(,"; '- "- -.--~ ~rl-~&...1--r;'--f.- -. -,.& s: ' .~ = .-'~.:~~. ~.:f ,-~ :' ,'_i ,-, _., . ~~ _. . "--=-.~.r~.;.:. ~ -= ,~:,""1 . Kå.Çkw-Dr:l ve ~ _-:.-- _ CI~ ~~~ ~.' ~ "'_',~- . ,._~-:~ ~..~=r",,'" . . , -~ ,-----' _.. ;;! - . _. ~- -- - . _.. ~,-. ." - -- . Balto. City \ ,~:~~-;:p}:~~~=~:-~~'.-3;; MISC. ~987 S;;;-;;_:~ DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ~\ ~~~'-~+ .~'-_·ìl;~~;~-._L,~- ".Ck:.~r~: 'rOIl aMera to South S 150,000 "'. -1- :;ti: " i. "<'..,,10 V11lovcrest fro. Tourist to South ~_.- _.> -.-----~~... ~. City Ll.ltl 218,000 . .;.. ..;;..:; '~-. -~-=- ~_~! --~". ~. Terry Drive fro. Colle,e Circle to . I. . U··· ·~7 ~,;-'. . Circle Drive South 80,000 , :-..., . ;. ,~/ :'.-;~ ,.".~ Crabtree Lane fro. Turner to the - . · \. · I: . , ril i -,. ~ North Dead Bnd 125,000 =: I I· - ---- ::./. ~~~ Payte Lane fro. Turner to the - e North Dead Ind ~~~ Rlchland Plaza Drive fro. Blllye ~e raye to Broadway v~· --- ~I ::) ~. I >. .. .' :. .c .. ... Ia C o fJ C t! Bursey Road ~- //~~ ,'~ . "' t ~ ~. -ø . o II: . C If'4 ...J I I I fJ U C ; If'4 U ., ... At I I Ie I I I I I I Ie 135,000 198,000 Villowcrest Total Bstlaated Cost . (Not Includln. Utility Adjust.ents) S 906,000 CITY 0' NORTH RICBLAND BILLS, TEXAS I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I p"tlt Ij STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT VILLOVCREST DRIVE MISC. 1987 STREET AND DRAINAGE I MPROVEHENT: RICHLAND PLAZA DRIVE From Broadway to Billie Faye 45' BIB, 1,890 L.V. 6" Curb, 24" Gutter 6" Thick BMAC 8" Lime Stab. Subgrade 6" V.L., PVC, 1,640 L.P. ~ From Broadway to Tourist 31' BIB, 2,050 L.r. 6" Curb, 24" Gutter 6" Thick BHAC 8" Lime Stab. Subgrade French Drain . Line "A", 6" PVC 570 , L.V. . Line "B", 6" PVC, 370 L.P. 6" V.L., PVC, 1,520 L.F. .. . I P,Ii?/ VE '4A Z6 ., -r, \ .. , 10 /. 4/ # \~/~ V T.. 3Øt'" \ .Sl -- .... .. ~,.:' , :- ;p' : .0 ::'tI~. Ie I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .. . D~. ,.... mm lJ I..~ ~". ~ "1", k..> A.. 3 A..c. !. 4.,. .~ 112 to"3 1. , 1 ~ A , -r~ ..0 ~ II :Q i ~ .:..~ ¡þ ( "f ~ ....1. ~ 2", . II' f o~~ IJA. T Þ..V&  C'r¿ . I~,-- + ìs< lOW (, 85 A.,. ~ . + S' ~4~ :;: I. . ; 1 ~ 2 : oJ ;3+ 4 TQ '2A . r, 1Q '0 "'g ?" -':'-~~-¿ ~ a:.. N~ P'T A. :. -- .... -' I / / / ~~ ;. 5 3·357 MISC. 1987 STREET AND DRAINAGE I" , ,. ,,1 CO( L £ ¡; ~ TERRY DRIVE I le( I o College Circle to College Circle S. 31' BIB, 1,000 L.F. 6" Curb, 24" Gutter 6" Thick HHAC 8" Lime Stab. Subgrade 6" V.L, PVC, 1,000 L.F. I"",. ." ~ + I"> l~~"."" + #0 e . . 1; ~ 9 ~ '.... '. i UøR 7R :: .. ~ J ¡þ @ .- . ---.-- 1-- -- I I I ~ I I , I I j I I I I I , i I I I L _'.. -:! .~a_.~ -!~l...eJ .0 · ..I "'" ~,W~ 1/'11 ~ W~~c., ... ,~O<. · . · 6 ""c..~ " : CD· ~ .' f ( .,...c,'- ,,~ - .- O'-'~""~ ,~l/ p C.... - ",''J(fO ~ ~ '1 ~ ' .I ~ . ... , '-~ Q~-, ., [,'1"; '~1 ~"'7 ~..3~~ Cd ... :' ,,~ 'T ... ...~ ï A II( ... ...,.... , ~ '3 ~ , , I· ~.~:~, '. " "1 .t. '.. 8' ~. '0 : II ~ ~ &4 : t, "'I ,.. U! ~ ~:=I 'Zi. ~~.~~ A.Ji~1Ia - Ie I "'0 + I . , r I TJt~ '',C(S-3(!, I I I -" ..' .. .. "<b" J" .. ~~V '0. . '~~.~ : ., t~<=~ .. "-- 11 1& i 14) ~ 10· ". n ! .u\,.,.... ~ .~I ,.! Z7! 2, = '- 4 ff- ~ 19 [,.~. . I ' .. .. . . .. , , . " ,. ,. 1. , 1 ,. w6- ' ....I L "O' I I I ~ ~ ':.t:; ~' '. ", . f I~ : r:F CT. PAYTE LANE I ..v , '. ,", 3-357 MISC. 1987 STREET AND DRAINAGE I . .. , ' I . . 2,: '22' ;~ ">.. .' c 2 , '2'2. . ~~ o ; '2~... ~ ~ '! -z. :- I ' · ~.. '" ,.'''.9 ...., ~ ~f5 ~ _~,.. U....' ~ t. I ~!~ e : Q ~ ,'- ; S21 1.~.4 ,t.,. . 4..040 n.. ')1.9 · '!).~._ ~ '~-,..' ~, leG' gll '20 r- ! T &u . ,,~ -. tS 0 ..J .,t.. ~ '. . -.. g ~/.Rt)AL-a 21 !: : .e- & Ik . _ C.~,I ""6 " ~. ... 'Z'2Q C"\., co ...~ ~ ., ,... I :. 13 : . , ;. 14 . .. v C/ ~ ïø . ""~ V.S Ac.. ,J, *.. - '.Z. .. TQ.~. I ill, '2M TR 16. ~ "400 ·t Iv -It- ". .. ~Q . , """ 0 : '"" C' I. ~ .: : II I~ ; l) . ,., ':J, '.'.6 \II'" '" ~ ,~ : ~ . ,.. . ... " .., ¡ ~ 1 ~ , : ~ ~ ¡: .... ,~ I" , k.~ I A.c.. . . , C3 ÂC. . . . -" ~ -. .1.1 , ,:. ~ .,. ~ ~11 (,~; 'u ~ S "T ~,R, N e:cs. ¡ 'g ~ 0';' ; ~ ;" ~ ~. ~I ~~;~ "5-; ~ '. ., -, .. I ~ \ ~ . ¡ 2e", 2. ' .' ,~ ~ .." ~.. ... - ~ 11110,' .' 7A: ~ .2\ 0 '2ARr . ... ~', R.: IJ. .. " :~ 1ft, . 2.. .. "'. -: ~ "'" ~ ~ øz!t ~ ". II.,.' '~..J ... ~, ¿ , ... J a ' G J V :- ~~ ~ IJJ 3 :. '2'2; ~~. ~ '2']- = ~ I ~R :.,J I' \J r:\ ~,~ . I?, , "c.., ~ A ... " . 3·357 MISC. 1987 STREET AND DRAINAGE ~! ~I ~I ~I , ~I u~ r T. '0 2 2 A.c., 110, .c -- .. ~ 1."'T ~R ,.: "'..~ CRABTREE LANE Turner to Hightower 31' B/B, 1,400 L.F. 6" Curb, 24" Gutter 6" Thick HHAC 8" Lime Stab. Subgrade 6" V.L., PVC, 1,400 L.F. ., , 'It I"l· i'.. .....::.. 10 ~ t~ ~~I~·. ,;, ~.;~ ;, '2'2 ~ '21.6~ \ + R_ f R i ~: - R - ~ , ')$.4- "H6I-4TO~E~ CR. -....t~ '''',t''O B~ '80.&,1 '''~,U' ... 1\. I . _." : : I ..' .-!f. 4 : I '2 ... ~ ~ ~ '2 ~ (15 '.. I .... ,'Q 3 ,,:t. 14 '" ~ "3 ,~... : '~:z. ~ '\9 ;P... : ~ " ~ ;. LS¡:- ~·.4 ~'".. 13~: ;. I ~I 2 ~ ~~, 3 ~ '. ..... ,'" : ~ I~ ~ ,~ . ~,5 . (I" 12. tIIIIIí: .. . . t) . ~ II' ' ~lø ~.........~ .. 'IIIIfiI1 : ~ " " J: .. ... I ~ .. .-..A.- 8 : "10 '1 ' ... , .: ~ 10 ~~I -. ~ ........ .... . p... ~ . ~ ., ~ ~ .. ~ IÒ~ " ., ,f)..II' J.,.. '.0 \ 0 ~ '60 ,. .. .,'ÿ ~,. ~I.JJ ~~~\1 '!rea. . ... '.. = ~. '" "d :~'2 ~~: ;1';; ..' .... : \1)3 ~ l' . . ., I ~.r- : (l-4 1'"7 11\,. ~ ~.. ~ I'''' .~ ,~ ~ ~: i'4 -. ;.~, 14..~: ~ ø~f.¿ ." &5 · ~J' ~ ~, ~ 11 " . I. ,r'- · ~"I n-: .'It',,, .. I " ,~ ~ "0 ... 4- 'w,t __ Üð ~ .... " ~ 1_ ~~ ~-. ~ I:' ;'.~'::,' \;~ ~ ~i:4 · :: · _ .... : '2 ..a.::. 10 \." '1... ,~ :< ,.~" I' c:-r. ~Yí;\Þt.a. CT. ~ Ió ~: r 't~'~ · : 3 :;!) ~" ~ ". ," I . . .... tt It ~ 1M..,. .. . I~" ~ 4· III ;'.<1: 8 . -;, ~... ,.. - : 8 ~ a .. ... ,.... ~,.'.. ..~ ~:·IS. ~,K·~ 5 I'~ ~ ,... ~_. ,1:, ~ ~" ~ s ~ 4 I , ~ . .. .... r,¡. . ~ ~ '<.12. ~ (,. i ~ II ¿ ..... ~~..~ ST. a . ~. u .I'" ~............. 'L'" · I~ .~'- ~ 5 ~ ¿I 3 : 1 ~ ., Turner to Hightower 31' B/B, 1,400 L.F. 6" Curb, 24" Gutter 6" Thick HHAC 8" Lime Stab. Subgrade 6" V.L, PVC, 1,400 L.F. ~ z 4IfrzW,,~: 5 " , I.~. , 211.1 . ~,~ . " '9,~: ~ .J IB ~ : ; ,-, " '0 1 11 A :: 1 ~ \ IS ¡~.. s~ ! 4) ~; ~I I~JI ~ « ,~" ~ 7fJ~~~ .. -Y ~ I 1'2 0 1/ 9' 'ip,\'! ~ø. ~~,\1JO ~~,I~ 14 u..- ~ __ r __ __ &. . IS' , "7~, ,~ -.v'JII .-. 10. :' .!.. J ~ .. ~ .. L &. ~ ~ 10- 7" .. . ~ "-~." J ~ ~ ~ ! 10.18 ::~ . II ~ ~ : \. . ,-~~:\ ., I~'~_-;- ;,-. /_ t. ~ S'" ~JJ Ih'f:"~ ,,,,. 190 J!.&.. J ~. 5 ,.. .. ~ tc-" 11 1!5 " .: 4!Þ 14 I' . 10 13 .. : ~ I 'I-M.~ & '2....... .. .... -- . - 7~ II-UJ~' ~:IT fØ ..... ~.... t ~ tf. 'A. (. ~ .. 2 .W - I' I ... ! ' I '" TA ,,..A ~ I' t::'\,. I 0.1..' ."e.J ~ , . t ".. ~ ~ : ~ .: .: . ; e 9 13" I' ~ . 10 I.. ~'" -- · AIIIJ'_ "" · ~ ~'.' ~ : 2.. .. 3.. : ~ 4 '? ~ ~ : I f '10 ,,) IS J4 .5 TT "0 I Ie I I II I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 88-41 Date: September 26, 1988 Subject: Issues Raised in Citizen IS Presentation at Public Hearing on Proposed Budget At the September 12, 1988 Public Hearing on the Proposed 1988/89 Budget, a citizen IS presentation was given which raised questions about the General Fund salary costs included in the proposed budget, and the effect of th~ tax rate as proposed on the owner of a hypothetical piece of property valued at $100,000. The City Council requested clarification of these matters. Salary Cost Analysis The citizenls presentation to the City Council on September 12th analyzed salary costs expressed in terms of average salaries. For your convenience, that information has been reproduced on the attached table in the section labeled Section A. The average salary information presented therein has also been expressed in terms of total personnel budget costs. The difference between the 1987/88 salary budget and the proposed 1988/89 budget is calculated to be $642,904, whereas the proposed budget for salaries as presented by the staff shows an increase for 1988/89 of $238,471 over 1987/88 (Section B), a difference of $404,433. The wide disparity between these two calculations is due to the fact that the citizen IS presentation differential ($642,904) is based on comparing the reestimated budget for 1987/88 with the 1988/89 proposed budget; whereas the real differential ($238,471) is based on comparing the adopted budget for 1987/88 with the proposal for 1988/89. The $404,433 difference between the two methods of analysis is caused by the significant retrenchment in salary expenditures that was implemented during the current fiscal year as required by revenue short-falls, as well as other factors. The best illustration of the fallacy of comparing reestimated expenditures in the current year with proposed expenditures for next year is provided in the Legal budget, in which the 1987/88 adopted budget provided $12,638 for the Paralegal who was budgeted for nine months on the payroll at 50% of her salary. Due to delays in remodeling to provide office space for the Attorney for the City and the Paralegal, her actual cost on the City Payroll for 1987/88 is projected at $4,213. Therefore, comparing estimated expenditures this year ($4,213) -with the proposed 1988/89 Budget ($15,483) would erroneously indicate a 368% increase. It is believed that the $238,471 differential in personnel cost for 1988/89 as shown is as accurate as possible, taking into consideration human limitations. ISSU ED BY TH E CITY MANAG ER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 Analysis of Tax Costs The citizen1s presentation purporting to show a dramatic increase in the tax bill on a hypothetical $100,000 parcel of property was flawed by including in the computations the amount of new value added to the tax roll each year by new construction. The attached table subtracts from the real property tax roll the new construction each year and shows that, compared to the base year of 1985/86 (taxable values as of January, 1, 1985) the total tax roll was increased by 16.2% in 1986/87, was reduced in 1987/88, and was further reduced in 1988/89 to the extent that the tax roll for next year on the real property that was on the tax roll in 1985/86 was only 1.1% higher than in 1985/86. Using the example of application of these numbers to a hypothetical $100,000 parcel of property, and taking into account increases in the tax rate, it can be seen that the tax bill for that piece of property, assuming its valuation was changed in proportion to the total tax roll change, would have increased by $109.65 over the four year period. It should be emphasized, as reflected in the attached table, that $97.47 of that increase is due to debt service on bonds which were approved by the voters by a 4/1 margin, and that the cost of maintenance and operations has increased only $12.18 over that four year period. * * * * If any additional information is desired it will be furnished upon request. Respectfully submitted, ~1J/~ Rodger N. Line City Manager RNL/gp CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Ie I I I I I I I en -I en -I Þ- ;:~ = (.) :z:: -I C LAJ --' :z: Ie 5ã - en GI: GI: LAJ ~Q.. GI: LA- o 0 % en LA- - o en I > >- --' Þ- C - :z: (.) -c: I I I I I I Ie I ....... ....... · I I 1 · en I · W t 1 - en t :~~! I ~ <C U) I en -' w t cC) :=U)~ t .......en::c t -CDU CD CD""'" en en CD ..... ~ CD ~-=~:~= -O-UOOOI ..... U.I a. "'0 CD U.....O..JO='CD U.lu.JWU.I L.CCten ~g~~Q.. - I ::;:) 0.. C> I CDOU) t a::: ex t eno..U.I tWo.. t ex::z:: I CD t c..... t"'O CD t 0..- 1 .uen I ~ 3C I ~ ~ 7 I (.) 10"'0_ I 1"'0 ='CD t t ~CDen t t - ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... I I t ..!.. en o (.) ..J w :z: z <:> en U) "0 CD a:: CD u en WCftCD- 0.. R..g cb ...JO~CD C L. CD en -Q.. - C> ..... i5 en w ëië :5 < en = "0 """ CD CD U)~-en <C ID .., - CD E =' I 1 _ 4J_ t4JUCD I .. -c: en . LU - ....... :: ª= = I....... W .... en - o 1 0.. en <:> a:: = Q..~ :z:: :z: ..... w - U) 3C w -= a:: en Q.. :z: W o - CJ) _ ex: - ..... c en (..) ....t >- w ~ --' en CJ) <C % :c ~~ CD :z: ~ wen - ..... w 0;::;;: LU - ....c: - c..> -' ....c: <C :lIE: U) ;:: W"'O ~ en en C) Q) ID CD LU C tn-Ot LU 0:: 0 110 - ex LU a. en 1 :> 0 CD ....c: It.. ~co Q. > Ot c - .. -0 .. at >- II) L. 1D 8.~ g- ~~2 Q.. (.) ~ :: ~ ~ o to c: Q. en ID o ..c L. ~ (.) Q.. > -c: æ ex: ....c: 0.. z: o (.) :z: <:> c LU"'O ~ CD cn ILl L. CD C~fIOcn CD fO-- e 10 1 :;en:; II) ~Ot u.I > - -c: "'0 II) Ot Q) C CD II) 0 Ot 0-- a. ~ 1 ~-;~ Q. 0 0\ 0.. - "'0 II) CD ~ð~ fIO__ =-;~ ..............~:1.~ II' U c: ~ = ë; ~...........---.~ ......... ~-~~_o-cn____~CD~~CD -~-_~""_""~CD~""~_~_~ ~-CIOO\CIO_""_""~_~O\""-CD ~"':~~~...:.;~~~~ø:~~..:~ -- ~~_:::._ ::'~"":::'Ln~"" ~O__~_CDCIO_O""~___cnen ~OClOCIO~CIOO\__OOO___""O =~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --"''''Vt~oen~_I,Ø_''''O_O O"'-__cn_cnVt\ft~~____ ....- .... -__-\ft_~~ .... .... OVtCDCDen_en____Vt........__- ~OO-"'O_I,Ø~-"'_...._CDCIOLn =~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -O....-\ftCD~_O....-_"'CDLn_ CD--__cnCDtDcn_-....CIO--_ -- .... -__-Ln__O II» U c: ~ ~ Q ---- o-....oo~__"'___"'~ -en....-__"'__Ln...._~_~O.... Vten...._CIOcn_....O_O~_~O_ ø: ~ ...: ~ .; .... .,,; .; ò ò .,,; ~ .,,; ...: ..... Ò ---~::.~:::.___Ln...."'_~:! OO__"'_CDCD_o....~___encn ~OCDCDI,ØCIOcn__ooo-__....o =~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --Ln\ftcn~ocntD_\O_....O_O OLn--_en_enen\ft~Ln____ ....- .... -__-Ln_~~ .... .... oen....-"'Vt"'....en~CDen....CDenoen tDOI.Ø-_LnLn_Ln__~....enl,Ø....CD =~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ---OClO--O~~O_"'CDcnen CD"" _1,Ø....CD~~__....__Ln.... - - .... - - _ _ "- '" _ Ln en .... - ---- O-....OO~__\ft___~~CDeno -en....---Ln-_Ln...._cn_I,ØO.... enVt...._CDcn_....O_O~_I.ØO_ ~~...:~.;...;.,,;.,;òò.,,;~.,,;....:.,,;ò ---~:::.~::.___Ln....~_~:! o_ocn....cn...._"'_cn__...._...._ -~............~~cnOLncn~-_o~~ ~-~-o~~__o....o-___ .,,;~~,..;~¿~..;.,,;..;...:~~~...;~ u G) c CÞ CD C U fO L ..c Q) (.,) 0.. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ o=~:cn=~=~=~~~=~=_ 1 I O~O....O~....~~___~CIOcn__ ....~CD_OO-__I.ØI,ØI,Ø_~OLn.... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CDI.Ø_CD_cn_~~...._I.Ø_I.Ø_1.Ø ~.... --............--........-....-- ~_O_CD__cn-_~O....tDl,Ø__ ....OI,Ø-IÞO_........-I,ØO...._OO\ft ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -...._\ftCDI,Ø"'...._I.Ø__O___ I.Ø.... _....__............................__ ~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOO_OOLnLnOLnOOLnCDO OOOLn___~--O-O"'_....o ~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~ ..- .- ~..- CZ) \I') OOO~OOOOOOOOOOOOO OOO....O_OO\ft"'O_OO~~o OOO-O__~-_O_\ft"'_""o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - - ft"'ttI....- co \I') .IJ ~ 1 : u ~ cn C II) tn~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fIO E ~CD c -;g.~4J2 cn ~ L~ ~ Æ~:š~æ ';Ut~ g~~ "E ~~~~~ ~~~ :JI C U G.I ~ U Q)"'4J ex o .., G.I cn CD e .,.. ea.'", ~ c ~ ~~~..,-~~g~~~~~==~~ 4JU~ 00> ceO c c: EJ:J >J:J L__ ~ - -G.l_-",U"'~O-C:JIfIOO_ oou~(.,)~x~xxu~~o..~Q..~ CD - cn - o CD - - .. ~ ~ - &0 .... - C* CD - U't U't en en - - - C* cn - - I.Ø C* .... c;:r, c;:r, \ft .... \.t') - C".I - I,Ø C".I - - CD - .... = .... - C* CD r: :: . .. :: :1 OJ -:; -0 ~ II) ~ E =é C G.I a. x OJ ~ ~ fO ~ ILl I f CD CD ª CD '-:; : ~ . .o~ CD ___ j~ ~~ "'0 "'0 ~ ~ 0. ~ ~ ~i 0. 0 ~ ~ .. .. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TAX INCREASE ANALYSIS - NRH BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 1985/1986 1986/1987 1981/1988 1988/1989 (1985 Tax Year) (1986 Tax Year) (1987 Tax Year) (1988 Tax Year) -------..-...~~..~...~..-... .......---........-----... ----.........----.............. -~-_..._------_...- Taxable Value (Real Property Only) $1,057,535,329 * $1,346,090,923 $1,379,843,282 $1,311,092,258 Less: Value of Property not taxed in FY 1986 - Cumulative (New Construction) (117,277,883) (195,493,113) (241,878,776) ......--..................-...--. ---------~....-....._- .......................----- $1,228,813,040 $1,184,350,169 $1,069,213,482 Percentage Change 16.2% 12.0% 1 . 1% EXAMPLE (See Note): --_.._---~------~~-- Taxable Valuation $100,000 $116,196 $111,992 $101,104 Actual NRH Tax Rate 0.3350 0.3350 0.4130 0.4398 ----.........---.....-..... ......---------......--- -----------..--- ...................----...-- Tax 8i11 $335.00 $389.25 $462.52 $444.65 Maintenance & Operations $197.00 $195.67 $219.95 $209.18 Debt Service 138.00 193.58 242.57 235.47 --------------- -_...--...-_...._--~-~--- -...-..._---_........_-~.... ..~...._-...._...__...-.. Tax Levy $335.00 $389.25 $462.52 $444.65 Cumulative M & 0 change ($1.33) $22.95 $12.18 Cumulative I & 5 change $55.58 $104.57 $97.47 -~-~--_........_--........ --..-...--....--..--... ----......._..._.._.....~.. Total cumulative change $54.25 $127.52 $109.65 * Fiscal year 1985/86 represents the base year (January 1, 1985 values). NOTE: This assumes that a $100,000 parcel of real property was increased in valuation by TAD in, 1986/87 by the same percentage as the total tax roll was increased, and was reduced in 1987/88 and in 1988/89 by the same percentage as the total tax roll was reduced. I .\ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order September 12, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Mayor Richard Davis Mayor Pro Tem Mack Garvin Councilman Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman Virginia Moody Councilwoman Byron Sibbet Councilman Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Richard Albin City Manager Senior Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer Absent: Lyle E. Welch Linda Spurlock Councilman Councilwoman 3. INVOCATION Mayor Pro Tem Davis gave the invocation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 22, 1988 APPROVED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the Minutes of the August 22, 1988 meeting. Motion carried 5-0. 5. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Davis removed Item No. 25 from the Consent Agenda. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 2 6. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29 & 30) APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to move Item No. 17 to this point in the agenda. Motion carried 5-0. 17. GN 88-72 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF "CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TAX AND GOLF COURSE REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1988" - ORDINANCE NO. 1565 APPROVED Mr. Line stated that First Southwest Company and the City's legal advisor have recommended to accept the bid of Clayton-Brown & Associates. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No. 1565 and the bid of Clayton-Brown & Associates, Inc. for the purchase of 4.23 million dollars City of North Richland Hills, Texas Tax and Golf Course Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1988 dated September 1, 1988 with the net effective interest rate of 7.489762 percent. Motion carried 5-0. 7. PZ 88-7 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF JULIO AND EUMELIA E. NEIRA TO REZONE THE NORTH 150 FEET OF BLOCK 3, AUTREY ADDITION FROM R-3 TO C-2 (LOCATED AT 6650 GLENVIEW DRIVE _ SOUTH SIDE OF GLENVIEW DRIVE AT THE CORNER OF GLENVIEW AND RITA BETH STREET) (POSTPONED FROM AUGUST 8TH, 1988) Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Pedro Rodriguez, 5560 Glenview, representing Julio Neira, appeared before the Council. Mr. Rodriguez stated they wanted to build a restaurant on the property. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 3 Councilwoman Moody stated that at the Planning and Zoning Meeting there was concern about the traffic on Rita Beth and the parking problems. Councilwoman Moody stated that if the restaurant was not built, she was concerned about the other businesses that could go under the C-2 zoning. Councilwoman Moody asked if they would agree to a Planned Development restriction with no ingress or egress onto Rita Beth. Mr. Rodriguez stated they would. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked if they were going to use the existing house or would they build another building. Mr. Rodriguez stated they would use the existing house, but they would be putting brick around it. Councilman Garvin asked if the restaurant would have facilities for sit down or would it be a carry out restaurant. Mr. Rodriguez stated it would be both. Councilman Garvin asked where they planned for the cars to park and how they would enter and exit the parking lot. Mr. Rodriguez stated there was plenty of room for parking in the area at the back of the house and that they would access the parking lot from the other side of the house. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. 8. ORDINANCE NO. 1557 TABLED Councilman Garvin stated because the only access to the parking facilities would be through someone else's property and because of the location and size of the lot, he recommended that the request be denied. Mr. Rodriguez stated they would be parking in front and behind the house. Mr. Rodriguez stated it would be a small restaurant. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked if the Staff had looked at a proposed site plan layout. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he would like for the ordinance to be postponed until a site plan could be submitted showing the parking and landscaping. Mr. Horvath stated he was concerned about the expense involved in upgrading the building from residential to commercial. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 4 Councilwoman Moody stated she felt it should be tabled until a site plan could be submitted and for the applicant to get with the City Staff concerning what would be involved to bring the building up to City Code. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to table Ordinance No. 1557 and that the applicant bring in a site plan showing how they are going to refurbish the building, parking, landscaping, entrances, etc., and with the recommendation that there be no entrances off of Rita Beth, screening walls as required by City Code and bring it back to the Council in one month. Motion carried 5-0. 9. PZ 88-11 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF E-SYSTEMS POOL TRUST TO REZONE TRACTS 4B, 4A1, 4A4, 4A5A, 4A5B AND 4A5C, J. H. BARLOUGH SURVEY, ABSTRACT 130 FROM R-3 TO C-l (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LEWIS LANE AT DAVIS BOULEVARD) Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing for PZ 88-11, PZ 88-12 and PZ 88-13 and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Mr. David Washington, Washington & Associates Engineers, 500 Grapevine Highway, Hurst, representing E-Systems Pool Trust, appeared before the Council. Mr. Washington stated that PZ 88-11 was for commercial zoning. Mr. Washington stated the property was bounded on the east by Lewis Lane, was immediately south of the future extension of Watauga Road, bounded on the north and east by eXisting commercial and on the west across Lewis Lane by existing commercial. Mr. Washington stated that approval of this request would allow the planning of the entire property and would assist in solving what could be a major traffic problem at the intersection of Davis, Watauga and Lewis Lane by allowing the closing of Lewis Lane. Mr. Washington stated that PZ 88-12 was located immediately south of the Sunny Meadows Addition. Mr. Washington stated this proposed zoning was a transitional zoning from the existing Holiday East Mobile Home Park located to the south to the R-3 buffer to the north. Mr. Washington stated it was a stepping zoning from the mobile home park to R-7 to R-8 to R-3 in the existing development. Mr. Washington stated the property was bounded on the east by proposed industrial zoning and on the west by existing R-7 zoning. Mr. Washington stated that PZ 88-13 concerned the proposed industri'al zoning east of Sunny Meadows Addition. Mr. Washington stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended, and the owners concurred, that the area to the north of the proposed Watauga Road be zoned C-l, there be a 200 foot wide strip adjacent to the existing residential zoning of 0-1 and that the remainder of the property be granted for industrial. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 5 Councilwoman Moody asked if E-Systems had met and obtained input from any of the homeowner organizations. Mr. Washington stated they talked to the homeowners on an individual basis and met just prior to the Planning and Zoning Meeting. Councilwoman Moody asked if they had any buyers for the property or was this speculative zoning. Mr. Washington stated the purpose at this time was to obtain the zoning so that E-Sy~tems could plan the land and the area. Mr. Washington stated there were no immediate prospective users. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked how wide the proposed Amundson Drive right-of-way would be. Mr. Washington stated that the proposed right-of-way was sixty-eight feet. Mr. Washington stated one of the options discussed at the Planning and Zoning meeting was that Amundson would line up as it exists on the north where it would come down immediately next to Sunny Meadows Addition. Mr. Washington stated they had proposed that Amundson be moved over 25 feet and that would be an additional 25 feet of buffer or greenbelt area that would be dedicated to the City in addition to the 68 foot right-of-way. Mr. Washington stated there was an option that Amundson could be moved any place within that 200 feet. Mr. Washington stated that this could be discussed when the property was platted. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked Mr. Washington if he would be opposed to the approval of the proposed I-2 zoning with the stipulation that the area north of the proposed Watauga Road be C-1 and that a 200 foot strip be zoned 0-1 and consideration be given to a buffer zone contingent upon Amundson location. Mr. Washington stated they could accept that. Councilman Metts asked if they were proposing a 25 foot green belt and then 200 foot 0-1 zoning. Mr. Washington stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended accepting a total of 200 foot strip of 0-1 zoning. Mr. Washington stated the location of Amundson was discussed, the 25 foot greenbelt was discussed and they were still in agreement to giving the 25 foot greenbelt assuming that Amundson fell adjacent to the property. Mr. Dan Echols, 5016 Nevada Trail, appeared before the Council. Mr. Echols stated the development of this portion of the City was vital to the City·s development. Mr. Echols stated that E-Systems had made every effort to construct the buffering necessary for the welfare of Sunny Meadows residents. Mr. Echols stated he was in sympathy with the Sunny Meadows residents, but that he fully believed that all of the problems had been solved and that all three of the requests were reasonable. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 6 Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. Mr. Noah Campbell, 9200 Martin Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Campbell stated that at the Planning and Zoning Meeting there was a statement made that there would be 1200 square feet homes. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that in R-8 zoning the minimum square footage for a house was 1,200 square feet. Mr. Campbell stated he felt it should be at least 1,600 square foot houses. Ms. Kathy Robinson, 6463 Chilton, appeared before the Council. Ms. Robinson expressed her opposition to these zoning requests. Ms. Robinson asked that the zoning be denied until E-Systems contacted all of the citizens and let the citizens jointly settle the problems in the area. Councilman Garvin asked what problems she felt should be addressed by Mr. Washington. Ms. Robinson stated one problem was the proposed offices. Councilman Garvin stated it was to provide a buffer to the people in Sunny -Meadows Addition. Councilwoman Moody stated that E-Systems was not a developer, that this was speculative zoning. Mr. Charles Scoma, 8300 Cardinal Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Scoma stated he was speaking against the multi-family zoning. Mr. Scoma stated he did not feel it was practical to approve the zoning on the basis of a transition at this point. Mr. Scoma stated he felt the request for commercial zoning on Davis Boulevard was a practical consideration for zoning. Mr. Scoma stated that in regard to the industrial zoning, his opinion was that the property on Grapevine Highway should be sold and developed before rushing into an industrial zoning on this piece of property on a speculative basis. Mr. Scoma stated the proposed routing of Watauga Road thorough this property that was put together by pieces and parcels to make a major holding investment is primarily for the purpose of making a profit for E-Systems. Mr. Scoma stated he did not want to deny them making a profit but did want to deny the right of impacting negatively upon the residents of the City. Mr. Scoma stated he felt there was a great deal of reluctance from E-Systems for the granting of rights-of-way for Watauga Road, his position was to petition the State to go back to the original routing of Watauga Road, and let E-Systems develop the property they own with their own roads, right-of-way and that the City of North Richland Hills not have to be concerned about the acquisition of right-of-way and proceed with the east west route that all recognize the need for. Mr. Scoma stated another alternative was to look at the proposed Cannon Drive and consider the property north of Cannon Drive to be residential rather than industrial zoning. Mr. Scoma requested that I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 7 the City Staff look at the possibility of relocating the proposed Simmons Road to the west to where it would tie into the existing Cardinal Lane that turned and went north and south. Mr. Scoma presented a sketch to the Council. Mr. Scoma further recommended that the area between Amundson and Simmons Drive be considered for residential zoning so that it tied to the other residential zoning and anything south of Cannon Drive be industrial. Mr. Scoma asked the Council to reject the request until a specific use plan could be developed and presented. Councilman Garvin stated the industrial proposal had been compromised with good buffering. Councilwoman Moody asked how many times representatives from E-Systems meet with him and his group. Mr. Scoma stated if Mr. Washington met with residents, he met with residents that have not spoken to him and that he did not meet with him. Councilman Garvin stated one of Mr. Scoma's proposals was to take the thoroughfare down Martin Drive. Councilman Garvin stated he felt there would be residents on that street who would not be happy with that proposal. Mr. Scoma stated the residents on Martin Drive had anticipated the road being routed that way until it was changed on the Master Plan in 1986. Mr. Roy Owen, 8245 Pearl Street, appeared before the Council. Mr. Owen stated he was against the proposed zonings. Mr. Owen stated E-Systems was just a speculator. Mr. Owen stated the land would not be developed for several years. Mr. Owen stated he would like to see E-Systems sell the property on the contingency of submitting for approval what would be developed. Mr. Owen stated he felt it would be wrong to change any zoning until E-Systems could bring before the Council someone who was interested in developing the property. Councilman Metts stated he had observed both sides and that there was a disparity of opinions concerning E-Systems and the citizens wanting to get together. Councilman Metts asked if E-Systems would be willing to meet with the citizens. Mr. Washington stated they had attempted to set up a meeting prior to the Planning and Zoning Meeting and did meet with a few individuals at that time. Mr. Washington stated they would like to see the issue resolved as soon as possible. Mr. Washington stated they talked to the individuals who lived immediately next door to the site, tried to give those individuals proper buffering and feel like they have done that. Councilman Metts stated some felt they had not had an opportunity to meet with E-Systems. Councilman Metts stated he was not comfortable with changing the zoning without knowing what was going to be developed. Ms. Campbell, realtor, appeared before the Council. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 8 Ms. Campbell stated she was concerned about the value of the homes in the Stoneybrook area if 1,200 square foot homes were allowed to be built. Councilwoman Moody stated if the City were to eliminate all 1,200 square foot homes, the first-time home buyers would be eliminated from the City. Ms. Hocevar, 6251 Shirley Drive, appeared before the Council. Ms. Hocevar stated she would not have bought three years ago if she had thought there would be zero lot line houses across the street from her. Ms. Hocevar stated she felt E-Systems was not interested in developing land but in making a profit and they did not care who got hurt. Councilman Garvin stated the proposed R-8 zoning did not back up to Ms. Hocevar; that there was another street between her and the R-8 zoning. Councilman Sibbet stated he did not like zero lot line homes or apartments, but there were times when you had to make a decision. Councilman Sibbet stated he had empathy for Ms. Campbell; that his home was located next to apartments, the same as was proposed for her area. Mr. James Kohler, 6308 Shirley Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Kohler stated there was a half-hearted meeting in the lobby at the Planning and Zoning meeting; however there was no concurrence, agreements or settlements made as to what should be on the tract of land to be rezoned. Mr. Kohler stated he felt the request should be tabled until something definitely could be agreed upon by E-Systems, him and the owners of the land adjoining the property to be rezoned. Mr. Koler stated he would like to request that it be in writing what was going to be developed when, where and how. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearings RECESS Mayor Brown called a ten minute recess. BACK TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting back to order with the same members present. RECESS Councilman Garvin and Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked for a fifteen minute recess to talk with Mr. Scoma. BACK TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting back to order with the same members present. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 9 10. ORDINANCE NO. 1562 APPROVED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, that a moratorium be put on all spec-zoning until an ordinance was in effect that placed a time-frame on the zoning as to when it was developed before it reverted back to the original zoning. Motion failed 3-2; Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilmen Garvin, and Metts voting against and Councilwoman Moody and Councilman Sibbet voting for. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve Ordinance No. 1562. Motion carried 5-0. 11. PZ 88-12 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF E-SYSTEMS POOL TRUST TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 8, J.H. BARLOUGH SURVEY, ABSTRACT 130, FROM R-3 TO R-8 (LOCATED EAST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF THE SUNNY MEADOWS ADDITION) Public Hearing was heard with Item No.9. 12. ORDINANCE NO. 1563 APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve Ordinance No. 1563 with the stipulation of 1,400 square foot houses. Councilwoman Moody stated that E-Systems had previously requested a R-7 buffer between the Mobile Home Park and R-3 and now they were asking for R-8 as a buffer between R-7 and R-3 zoning. Motion carried 4-1; Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilmen Garvin, Metts, and Sibbet voting for and Councilwoman Moody voting against. 13. PZ 88-13 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF E-SYSTEMS POOL TRUST TO REZONE TRACT 11, T.K. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1055, AND TRACT 2A, L.C. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1652, FROM R-3 TO I-I (LOCATED ON CARDINAL LANE AND EAST OF SUNNY MEADOWS ADDITION) Public Hearing was heard with Item No.9. 14. ORDINANCE NO. 1564 APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 10 Councilwoman Moody moved to deny Ordinance No. 1564. Motion to deny died for lack of a second. Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve Ordinance No. 1564 with the stipulation that Amundson Road have a 50 foot buffer to the west which would be between a road and residential property and the zoning east of Amundson Road be 125 feet of 0-1, professional type office space. Motion carried 3-2; Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilmen Garvin and Metts voting for and Councilwoman Moody and Councilman Sibbet voting against. 15. GN 88-70 PUBLIC HEARING - OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. Mr. Maness, Finance Director for the City, appeared before the Council. Mr. Maness briefly outlined the proposed Operating Budget for fiscal year 1988/89. Ms. Jean Sallee, Director of the Tarrant Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse, Northeast Area, appeared before the Council. Ms. Sallee urged the Council to reconsider the proposed $1,000 cut in support of the Tarrant Council. Mr. Charles Scoma, 8300 Cardinal Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Scoma presented an overhead slide, of his analysis of the tax increase, to the Council. Mr. Scoma stated he felt there were some areas in the budget that needed to be looked at for consideration. Mr. Scoma stated salaries was the greatest expense factor. Mr. Scoma presented an analysis of the increase in personnel salaries including benefits broken down by departments. Mr. Scoma recommended to the Council that they consider how they could achieve some savings in the area of the five percent performance increase. Mr. Scoma stated there was a projection of approximately a 40 person turnover in the City for 1988/89 and there could perhaps be savings in the consolidation of job tasks as people leave. Mr. Scoma stated that eventually the CIP Funds would be depleted and he felt the City should begin thinking of how the City could generate revenues so that it could operate off of revenues rather than borrowed money. ' Councilman Garvin stated that salaries might be a cost factor but the function of the City was to provide services and if salaries were cut, services would be cut. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 11 Mayor Pro Tem Davis thanked Mr. Scoma for his time and the effort spent. Mr. Dan Echols, 5016 Nevada, appeared before the Council. Mr. Echols congratulated the Staff and Council on putting together what he felt like was a very good budget. Councilman Garvin recommended that the Staff be requested to transfer funds from the City Council 's Budget to the Fire Department Budget to cover the salary for one Firefighter. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated he wanted it on record that if a fireman should leave, the position would not be filled. Councilwoman Moody stated the Council was not authorizing another position, only trying to keep from laying someone off. Council supported the recommendation. Councilman Welch, being absent, had submitted a letter in support. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to set the date for the adoption of the 1988/89 Budget for September 26, 1988. Motion carried 5-0. *16. GN 88-71 REVISED AUDITORIUM POLICY APPROVED *18. GN 88-73 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A "PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR AGREEMENTII - RESOLUTION NO. 88-32 APPROVED *19. GN 88-74 CONTRACT FOR LABORATORY SERVICES WITH THE TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY APPROVED *20. GN 88-75 OPERATION SUPPORT FOR CIP PROJECT AND IMPACT ACCOUNTING SYSTEM APPROVED *21. GN 88-76 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH RICHARD PHELPS AS GOLF COURSE ARCHITECT APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 12 *22. GN 88-77 ENDORSEMENT OF THE TEXAS GOOD ROADS AMENDMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 88-31 APPROVED *23. GN 88-78 APPROVE RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE NEED FOR A ROADWAY ACROSS NORTHEAST TARRANT COUNTY - RESOLUTION NO. 88-34 APPROVED *24. PU 88-49 APPROVE PURCHASE OF LAND FROM GEORGE P. MACATEE III, ET AL FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING CALLOWAY BRANCH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II APPROVED 25. PU 88-50 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR ACQUISITION OF LAND FROM RICHMOND BAY DEVELOPMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 88-33 POSTPONED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to postpone Resolution No. 88-33. Motion carried 5-0. *26. PW 88-30 APPROVAL OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 APPROVED *27. PW 88-31 APPROVAL OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 APPROVED *28. PW 88-32 APPROVE PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALK ON STARNES ROAD APPROVED *29. PW 88-33 APPROVAL OF EMERALD HILLS WAY WATER LINE RECONSTRUCTION AS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO MARTIN DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 13 *30. PAY 88-4 APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT TO T.W. GILMORE CONSTRUCTION AND CALVIN BAKER CONSTRUCTION, JOINT VENTURE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,344.75 AND AUTHORIZE TRANSFER OF FUNDS APRPOVED 31. CITIZENS PRESENTATIONS MS. KARON CONTIZANO RE: TRAFFIC CITATION Ms. Karon Contizano was not present at the meeting. 32. ADJOURNMENT Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: &Ubject: I I I I I I I Administration C ·1 M . D 9/26/88 ouncl eetlng ate: GN 88-82 Agenda Number: Appointments to Board of Adjustment Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Board of Adjustment as follows: COUNCIL PLACE NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM - 2 4 6 Jim Kemp Jeff Bunting Harold Schubert September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Board of Adjustments. e Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget .Ot r Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable It¿ lØðf~ City Manager . Finance Director I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 1 I. Department: I I I I I I I e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Subject: Appointments to Board of Appeals 9/26/88 Council Meeting Date: GN 88-83 Agenda Number: Administration Consistent with the City Council policy regar~~ j appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to che Board of Appeals as follows: COUNCIL PLACE NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM 2 4 6 7 Joe Crane Mary Norwood Robert Skinner Eric Hill (as alternate) September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1989 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Board of Appeals. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acet. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available e gf:;~ting Budget - f2 ~ 9z~e~::~ature · - - ~ty Ma2 CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 otl I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: .Ubject: I I I I Administration 9/26/88 Council Meeting Date: GN 88-84 Agenda Number: Appointments to Cable TV Board Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Cable TV Board as follows: COUNCIL PLACE NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM - 2 4 6 George Angle Ray Fulenwider Pat Carruth September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Cable TV Board. e Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Department Head Signature /2~~/~ City Manager . Finance Director ~ &~:.J I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: -SUbject: I I I I Administration 9/26/88 _ Council Meeting Date: Appointments to Capital Improvement Advisory CommitteeA d N b GN 88-85 gen a um er: Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee as follows: COUNCIL PLACE NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM - 2 4 Mayor David Barfield David Green Patricia Marin (alternate) September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council mak~ appointments to the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee. I e Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available _ Operating Budget _ wOther _ /) ~ Ou¿~ ~ !5- '11: _.. ~~ T Department Head Signature City anager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: .ubject: I I Administration Council Meeting Date: 9/26/88 Agenda Number: GN 88-86 Appointments to Civil Service Commission Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Civil Service Commission as follows: COUNCIL PLACE NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM 2 4 6 7 Bernard R. Raux (as alternate) George Pederson Steve Hall (as alternate) Bob Roark Oc tober, 1989 October, 1989 October, 1989 October, 1989 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Civil Service Commission. I I ~ ~e I I ~ ~ I ~I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget .Other I ~~~~~:JRI/II?-~ T Department Head Signature ' City Manager I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I Ie I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration 9/26/88 Council Meeting Date: GN 88-87 Agenda Number: Subject: Appointments to Library Board Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Library Board as follows: COUNCIL PLACE 2 4 6 Mayor NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM Jan Daniels Roxie Hamilton Kay Schmidt Alisa Wood (as alternate) September, 1990 September" 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Library Board. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available KIÚ?~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I Ie CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration . . 9/26/88 - Council Meeting Date: GN 88-88 Agenda Number: SUbject: Appointments to Parks and Recreation Board Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Parks and Recreation Board as follows: COUNCIL PLACE 2 4 6 NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM Wade Parkey Don Tipps Douglass Davis September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Parks and Recreation Board. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available e g~perating Budget ~ÙÆJ ¡¿-;J ~I/{ ?~ Department Head Signature I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration C 'I M ' D 9/26/88 ouncl eetlng ate: GN 88-89 Agenda Number: Subject: Appointments to Beautification Committee Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Beautification Committee as follows: COUNCIL PLACE NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Katheryne Robinson Juanita Kemp Robert Powers Janice Davis Alice Scoma Arfan Jabri Pat Fisher September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Beautification Committee. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget O~~~20 ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I< tfj/!t~ City Manager , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I Ie CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration ubject: . 9/26/88 - Council Meeting Date: Appointments to Planning and Zoning Commission A d N GN 88-90 gen a umber: Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Planning and Zoning Commission as follows: COUNCIL PLACE 2 4 Mayor NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM David Barfield David Green Patricia Marin (as alternate) September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available f!-Øt/~ Department Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 1\ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance Council Meeting Date:9/26/88 GN 88-91 Agenda Number: Certified Tax Roll - Resolution No. 88-30 The "Truth-in-Taxation" section of Chapter 26 of the Texas Property Tax Ccxìe requires that the Chief Appraiser of the taxing district supply each taxing unit within that county with certified totals of all appraised values within that taxing unit. l-1r. William Roberts, Chief Appraiser of Tarrant Appraisal District, has sul:mitted totals of appraised values to the City of North Richland Hills for our approval. The net taxable value is $1,414,351,912. Also, in accordanCe Section 26.01 of the State Property Tax Ccxìe, the Chief Appraiser is directed to prepare a list of all properties pending disposition before the Appraisal Review Board. These values are not included in the net taxable values. However, in cat1puting the effective tax rate the value of those properties {$32,399,392} must be added to the net taxable value as stated above. Those values will be included on a subsequent tax roll after final disposition by ARB. In consideration of the fact that the final disposi tion of sane of the appeals will not be detennined until Mid-December and historically the ARB frequently grants request for valuation reductions, the proposed budget has been prepared assuming a loss of $15,000,000 in appeals. Recœmendation: It is recœmended that the City accept the net taxable value including the protested values in the amount of $1,446,751,304. Finance Review /ßr ..I. ~ N/A Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ , Finance Director ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I I. I I I I I I I - I I I I I I -. I I RESOLUTION NO. 88-30 WHEREAS, the City Council of this City received the Ad Valorem Tax Rolls for the year 1988 from Tarrant Appraisal District in the amount of net taxable value of $1,414,351,912 plus value of properties pending disposition before the Appraisal Review Board; and WHEREAS, the City Council studied said Tax Rolls and approved same on September 26, 1988. NCM , THEREFORE, be i t resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The approval of said Tax Rolls received fran Tarrant Appraisal District in September, 1988, be and is hereby ratified and said Tax Rolls shall collectively be considered the Tax Roll of this City for 1988 and it is hereby in all things adopted and approved. Passed and approved the 26th day of September, 1988. Tarmy Brown - Mayor ATI'EST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance Council Meeting Date:9/26/88 Granting of Exemptions FY 1988-89 - ·Resolution - 88-37 ' GN 88- 92 Agenda Number: The attached Resolution grants exemptions to those ci tizens of North Richland Hills that qualify for hanestead, over/65, or disabled citizens as specified in the State Property Tax Code. The éU1Dunts of the exemptions are the same fran previous years sunmarized as follows: 1. General Hanestead 15% minimum of $5,000 2. Over/65 equals $25,000 3. Disabled Citizens equals $25,000 Reccmœndation: Approve Resolution 88-37. Finance Review N/A Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other &~ /11e-v. - " Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~~7~ K /fI /t1'L(/ -/ I Finance Director City Manager Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I -I I I I I Ie I I RESOLUTION NO. 88-37 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. There shall be exenpt fran the Ci ty Ad Valorem Taxes for the year 1988, fifteen per CeJ1t (15%) (with a minimum of $5,000) of the assessed value of residential haœstead wi thin the Ci ty which is occupied by the owner as his haœstead. 2. Persons over the age of 65 years, claiming an exenption pursuant to Ordinance No. 676 shall have a $25,000.00 exemption from the assessed value of a residential haœstead. A person who is disabled within the neaning of Section 11.13 (m) of the Property Tax Code of the State of Texas, as of January 1st of each year shall be entitled to $25,000.00 exemption fran the assessed value of property owned by such disabled persons and used exclusively for haœstead purposes by such disabled persons. No person may claim both the "over 65" exemption and the "disability" exemption and no haœstead shall be subjected to both the "over 65" exenption and the "disability" exemption. 3. Persons claiming the exemptions nn.Ist ccroply with the City Ordinances and Texas Property Tax Code. PASSED AND APPROVED this 26th day of September, 1988. Tœmy Brown - Mayor A'ITEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS 'ID FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FinaÌlce Council Meeting Date: 9/26/88 Agenda Number:GN 88-93 Setti~g Tax- Rate for Fiscal Year 1988-89 Ordinance No. 1567 The attached Ordinance sets the Tax Rate at 43. 98¢ :per $100 valuation for budget year 1988-89. Recorrmendation: Approve Ordinance No. 1567. Department Head Signature Finance Review Acct. Number N/A Sufficien~s A~ ~ ~ Rll~~~' City Manager Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other . _/:;) ~ /J?~~" ~ . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I· Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I ORDINANCE NO. 1567 AN ORDINANCE LEVYING A TAX RATE FOR THE CITY OF NORTH RICHrAND HILLS, TEXAS FOR THE 1988 TAX YEAR BE IT ORDAINED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY <X>UNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHrAND HILLS THAT: We, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills do hereby levy or adopt the tax rate on $100 valuation for this City for tax year 1988 as follows: $ .2069 for the purposes of maintenance and operation. $ .2329 for the paynent of principal and interest on debt of this City. $ .4398 total tax rate. The tax assessor-collector is hereby authorized to assess and collect the taxes of the City of North Richland Hills on this 26th day of September, 1988. 1. That there is hereby levied and shall be collected as provided by law, an Ad Valorem tax for the year 1988 on all property, real and personal, except such property as may be exempt fran taxation by Constitution and the statutes of the State of Texas, and ordinances and resolutions of the City of North Richland Hills, situated within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, on January 1, 1988, and that the aIOOunt to be applied to the value of such property shall be 43.98¢ per $100.00 valuation. 2. That the tax so levied and assessed shall be apportioned to the accounts and funds in the aIOOunt as set forth above. The anounts collected for paynent of principal and interest on debt of the Ci ty shall be deposi ted into an interest and sinking fund for that purpose until a total of $3, 269 , 280 is deposited from the 1988 Ad Valorem tax levy. A three percent (3%) uncollectible factor is imputed. 3. That the taxes provided for herein are in accordance wi th the appropriate State statues. 4. Ad Valorem taxes levied by this Ordinance shall' be due and payable on October 1, 1988, and shall becaœ delinquent on the first day of February, 1989. pay¡œnt of such tax is due in one full installIœnt. 5. If the tax is unpaid after February 1, 1989, such tax will becaIE delinquent and penal ty and interest will attach and accrue as provided by the Statures of the Texas Property Tax Ccx1e Sec. 33.01. I· Ie 1 I 1 I I 1 I t' I I I I 1 I Ie 1 1 ORDINANCE NO. Page Two 6. In the event the taxes becaœ delinquent and in the event such delinquent taxes are referred to an attorney for collection, an addi tional amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the total aIOOunt of tax, penalty and interest then due shall be added as collection costs to be paid by the taxpayer. 7. Taxes herein levied and uncollected shall be a first prior and superior lien against the property, and the said lien shall be superior liens charges, and encumbrances, and such lien shall attach to personal property with the same priori ty as to real property. 8. The lien provided herein shall be attached as of January 1, 1988. 9. Should any section, provision or clause of the Ordinance be declared by a court of canpetent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validi ty of the Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so declared to be invalid. 10. The Ordinance shall becaœ effective fran and after the date of its approval and adoption as provided by law. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Ci ty Council of the Ci ty of North Richland Hills, Texas, upon first and final reading, at a regular meeting on the 26th day of September, 1988. Tœmy Brown - Mayor ATI'EST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS 'ID FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney :,øa CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance - 9/26/88 _ Council Meeting Date: GN 88-94 Agenda Number: Adopting Budget FY 1988-89 - Ordinance No. 1569 Budget adoption is the final step in the budget process. The attached Ordinance No. 1569 surrmarizes estimated revenues and proposed expenditures for the various operating funds as presented to City Council at the August 20, 1988 Workshop as \VeIl as the Budget as amended per the City Council's "straw vote" decisions, made on September 12, 1988. A sunmary of ~e tentative changes that were recœmended fran the Workshop and the Public Hearing are listed as follows: Proposed Budget as presented to City Council at Budget Workshop $11,599,208 1. City Council-Decrease in General Services transferred to Fire DepartIœnt to fund Firefighter EMT 2. Ci ty Council-Decrease in General Services per Budget Workshop 3. Carmuni ty Developnent-Transfer of Fire Inspector to Fire Department 4. Library-Deletion of Children's Librarian position 5. Police-Funding of a. School Crossing Guard (Starnes & Holiday) b. (4) Police Officers for 6 months c. Reallocation of funds from salary savings in Police Department to educational . supplies for Crime Prevention Services. , No effect on budget 6. Fire- Increase in funds transferred fran Community Developnent Budget for Fire Inspector position 7. Delayed implementation of Employee Benefits Package 28,483) 5,811) 34,902) 23,359) 3,500 69,352 -0- 34,902 49,333) 'Ibtal $11,565,074 Reccmnendation: Approve Ordinance No. 1569 adopting proposed Operating Budget for fiscal year 1988-89. Finance Review __ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget II Other .. ~ ) . ~ 7l7~...., ~ -' I Department Head Signature I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM N/A . Finance Dlfector Page 1 of 1 1< I. I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I ORDINANCE NO. 1569 AN ORDINANCE AOOPI'ING AND APPROVING A BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF NORm RICHIAND HILLS, TEXAS, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ocrIDBER 1ST, 1988 THROUGH SEPrEM3ER 30TH, 1989 WHEREAS, an annual operating budget for the fiscal year October 1, 1988 through September 30, 1989 has been prepared by the City Manager for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, and WHEREAS, said budget has been presented by the Ci ty Manager in accordance wi th the Ci ty Charter, and WHEREAS, public notices of a hearing u!X)n this pro!X)sed budget have been published as required, and the public hearing held on said budget, and it is the consensus that the budget, as suhnitted and amended, should be approved, to wi t: General & Debt Service Funds Revenues: General Fund Debt Service 'Ibtal Revenues Expenditures: City Council City Manager City Secretary legal Civil Service Mgmt Services/Purchasing Finance Econanic Develo¡:ment Management InfoDT1éltion Se:rvices Municipal Court Conmunity Develo¡:ment Library Envirornnental Services Public Works Parks & Recreation Police Fire Non-Depart:nental Total General Fund Expenditures Debt Service Requirements 'lbtal Expendi tures REX:X:I-1MENDED BUDGET AMENDED AND AOOPI'ED BUDGET $11,599,208 3,269,280 $11,565,074 3,269,280 $14,868,488 $14,834,354 $ 58,110 231,252 181,447 83,928 26,660 122,3.98 466,833 99,271 214,580 230,093 464,019 573,163 227,416 1,274,226 661,058 3,638,141 2,295,258 751,355 $11,599,208 3,269,280 $ 29,627 231,252 179,829 83,928 26,536 121,241 465,683 99,271 214,315 229,442 426,147 547,684 225,977 1,273,811 659,309 3,683,328 2,316,339 751,355 11,565,074 3,269,280 $14,868,488 $14,834,354 I I. I I I I I I I fI I I I I I I Ie I I ORDINANCE NO. 1569 Page Two RææMENDED BUDGET AMENDED AND AOOPTED BUDGET Utility Enterprise Fund Revenues: Water Sewer Interest Inoame & Misc. $ 7,088,838 4,479,172 575,909 $ 7,086,510 4,479,172 575,909 $12,141,591 Total Revenues $12,143,919 Expendi tures : Public WOrks/Utility Finance/Utility Non-DepartIœntal Total Expenditures $10,904,873 867,135 371,911 $12,143,919 $10,902,774 866,906 371,911 $12,141,591 Prarotional Fund Revenues $ 110,927 $ 110,709 $ 110,927 $ 110,709 $ 57,000 $ 57,000 $ 57,000 $ 57,000 $ 440,462 $ 425,325 $ 440,462 $ 425,325 $ 2,079,371 $ 2,079,915 $ 2,079,371 $ 2,079,915 $ 1,226,188 $ 1,225,694 $ 1,226,188 $ 1,225,694 Expendi tures Park & Library Fund Revenues Expenditures General/Utility CIP Fund Revenues Expenditures Management Services Fund Revenues Expenditures Self-Insurance Fund Revenues Expenditures THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILIS, TEXAS, that the Ci ty Council of the Ci ty of :North Richland Hills ratify, and approve the budget as filed and amended for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1988 through September 30, 1989. I· I. I I I I I I I fI I I 1 I I I '- I I ORDINANCE NO. 1569 Page Three PASSED AND APPROVED by a majority of the City Council at a rœeting in the Council Chamber of the North Richland Hills City Hall on the 26th of September 1988. Tcmny Brown - Mayor ATrEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Subject: Transfer of Laidlaw Waste Disposal Fees Ordll1ance No. 1555 Council Meeting Date:9/26/88 Agenda Number:GN 88-95 I I I The City charges Laidlaw Waste Disposal a fee of 10% of incaœ for residential users because we bill and collect the custaner charges as part of the water and sewer billing. Additionally we charge Laidlaw a 2% franchise tax on all customer collections. Traditionally both of these fees have been included in the General Fund and are budgeted for expenditure there. The current year estimates are $100,275 for billing incare and $33,075 for franchise tax. The auditors in their 1987 management letter expressed concern that the Water and Sewer Fund bears the cost of collecting sani tation charges but does not receive the incane. They recarmend that sani tation fees be recorded in the Water and Sewer Fund. However, they further state that if the City Council's policy is that the revenue is needed in the General Fund that the policy should be implemented by an interfund transfer. The establishment of an ordinance authorizing the transfer of 10% of the billing incane from the Water & Sewer Enterprise Fund to the General Fund would satisfy the auditor's management letter recarmendation. Recornnendation: It is recarmended that Ordinance 1555 be approved. Finance Review Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget . Other /?_ ïC:ec /'7Z. eo, .., Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I ORDINANCE NO. 1555 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORm RICHIAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: 1. The collection fee and the franchise tax realized by the City fran any solid waste disposal contract shall be deposi ted in, and becane a part of , the General Fund of the Ci ty . Passed and approved this 26th day of September, 1988. Tœmy Brown - Mayor ATrEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS 'IO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney I ,. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Management Infonnation Services Subject: Proposed AS/400 Computer System Council Meeting Date:9/26/88 Agenda Number:GN 88-96 I I I I I I I CUrrently, the System 36 at City Hall has a maximum disk capacity of 598 megabytes (598,000,000 characters). An extensive evaluation of our data storage utilization was conducted indicating a need to increase our storage capaci ty as soon as possible. We are currently reaching our maximum operating capacity during busy periods of the week (i.e. payroll, utility billing) . As the City adds vehicle maintenance, purchasing, cost accounting/arbitrage and average water billing IOOdules, it will necessitate one of the following options: A. Upgrade current system. A system upgrade would increase the disk capacity to 1.1 gegabytes (1,000,000,000 characters) at an estimated cost of $70,000. No further upgrades would be possible, and this option \VOuld suffice our data needs for approximately three years. B. Purchase an IBM AS400/Model 30 as proposed in the 88-89 operating budget. The AS400 would imœdiately increase our disk capacity to 2.0 gegabytes (2,000,000,000 characters) at a cost of $132,000. The system architecture of the 400 is designed for easy expandability for future growth and will acccmrodate the Ci ty' s needs to its roaximum growth. er options such as dual 36 applications and PC networking were considered and found to be too inefficient. Funding Source 1. Utility/Finance 02-20-01-6500 $ 82,903 2. Finance/General 01-20-01-6500 31,097 3 . General Capi tal Projects 13-00-95-6500 9,000 4. Utility Capital Projects 02-09-00-6500 9,000 $132,000 Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other _ /~~¿ 1 Departme~ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM x X- Acct. Number See above SUff~Ci4S Available 7'l~ f?-11/~ City Manager . Finance Director Page 1 of 2 I' 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I ~ It should be noted that the funding will not impact the General Fund Budget. Our current system will be sold to offset the cost that is expensed to the General Fund. Reconmendation: It is recœmended that City Council authorize the Directors of Purchasing and Management Information Services to work in conjunction to develop fonnal bid specifications, advertise for bids, and re:port bid results to City Council. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Purchasing _ Council Meeting Date: 9/26/88 Award of bid to *Miller Business Systems for the Subject: Annual Office Supply Contract Agenda Number: PU 88-51 On September 8, 1988, at 10:00 a.m., bids were opened for the Annual Office Supply Contract. The results are outlined below: Vendor Exceptions Amount of Discount off List 1. Origami Inc. 1 2. Central Office Supply 0 3. Continental Office Supply 1 4. Lenco Office Systems 0 5.* Miller Business Systems 0 35% 40% 42% 46% 46% Vendors Lenco Office Systems and Miller Business Systems submitted a tie bid. The Director of Management Services and the Buyer/ Expeditor made a site visit to each facility and the results are outlined below: Lenco Office Systems Miller Business Systems Square Feet Inventory Number of Full-time Employees Number of Part-time Employees Delivery Vehicles Delivery Personnel 6,000 20,000 155,000 7,000,000 3 300 1 1 2 10 24 20 Miller Business Systems was awarded the contract for fiscal year 1987-88 at a discount rate of 45% and complied with our specifications and needs satisfactorily. This, in combination with the exceptional facilities and inventory will offer us supplies and service, enabling us to carry very little inventory on hand. Presently we are placing orders for four to five departments per day. Recommendation: Award the Annual Office Supply Contract to *Miller Business Systems, the lowest and best bid, with the discount amount of 46% for the fiscal year 1988-89. Finance Review ~ Acct. Number 01-00-00-0705 SUffiCiÄdS Available . Finance Director wPJ Department Head Signatur CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Personnel eUbject: Recornœndation to Approve Bid for City Property Insurance for 1988-8~ Council Meeting Date: 9/26/88 Agenda Number:PU 88-52 We advertised for bids to renew our property insurance which expires October 1, 1988, and received bids fran the following canpanies: C~y ~tmg Employer's Casualty A (8) Insurance Canpany Deductible Premium $ 1000 $19,617 Wausau Insurance Canpany A+ (15) 1000 5000 30,717 29,263 31,716 29,451 22,654 * Hartford Insurance Canpany A+ (15) 1000 3000 5000 Nationwide Insurance A+ (15) 1000 3000 5000 25000 50,259 49,195 48,706 43,576 The bid specifications required bidders to have an A.M. Best financial and management aating of A+ (10) or higher. Employer's Casualty rating of A (8) is below the minimum Wlequirement of the specifications and we therefore recarmend that their bid be disqualified. Of the remaming bids, it has been detennined that the Hartford Insurance Canpany's bid of a $5000 deductible with an annual premium of $22,654 best suits the needs of the City. . Recarmendation: It is reconmended that the City Council accept the Hartford Insurance C~y's bid of a $5000 deductible with an annual premium of $22,654* and award Hartford the City's property msurance coverage for 1988-89. I ~ ~ I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~perating Budget X ~ther ~.' Department Head ~ature Finance Review Acct. Number 08-01-00-4500; Sufficie~unds Available ~ 7'7h~.. ,- If::Øtß~ City Manager 08-02-00-4500 . Finance Director I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I Department: Purchasing ~ New Fire Station ~ubject: 6801 Glenview I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget .. Other I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date: - Replacement for Fire Station 2, Agenda Number: 9/26/88 PU 88-53 On June 9, 1986, the City Council authorized retaining Phillip Swager & Associates to prepare plans and specifications for the construction of a fire station at 4001 Rufe Snow Drive, to replace Fire Station 2 located at 6801 Glenview. Bonds for this portion of the 1985 bond election for Fire Protection improvements are scheduled to be sold in March or April of 1989, with construction bids to be taken in approximately June or July. A representative of Phillip Swager and Associates will be at the Pre-Council Meeting September 26, 1988, to present to Council the preliminary architect's rendering for approval and respond to any questions Council may have. Funding Source: Funds to be Available Funds Required Proposed 1989 Bond Sale Unspecified Fire Bond Funds $300,000 116,000 $416,000 Construction Estimate Architect's Fee $373,273 42,095 $415,368 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the preliminary concept plan for Fire Station 2, with any modifications that may be desired. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director 1=::\ ~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Paqe 1 of 1 -~ I ... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I eartment: I \subject: Añmini~t:rëJt:inn Council Meeting Date: 6/9/86 ~plp~~inn nf AT~ni~p~~ for Fire Department Construction Projects Agenda Number: GN 86-53 I The CIP schedule provides for construction of the Watauga Road Fire Station 04 in January 1987. The other Fire Department construction projects are staggered with the final project (relocation of Fire Station #2) scheduled for January 1989. Future II consideration of bond sales may call for accelerating this schedule if possible. I Dennis Horvath and Chief Gertz reviewed the qualifications of 30 architectural firms who submitted information and who expressed a desire to work with the City on these projects. Using rating factors such as proximity, availability, comparable prior experience, unique competency, and reputation, Chief Gertz and I recommended seven firms that we felt were qualified and should be interviewed for this contract. I I Recommendation: II Award Architectural Service Contract to PSA. I' I I II II- I I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) l'i;;~ti9= ¡¡¡;;;;;j¡ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Councilman Harold Newman, Dennis Horvath and Chief Gertz interviewed the seven firms on April 22, 1986. On May 13, 1986 the final three selected firms were interviewed a second time. It is the consensus of the committee that we retain the firm of Phillip Swager and Associates (PSA) to work with the City to complete these projects. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available (211cZ~ City Manager . Fmance Olfector I D"",...,.... 1 ,...f. I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I ~epartment: Subject: I I I I I I I Ie I I I I Administration 9/26 - Council Meeting Date: Rejecting All Bids (Proposals) Received on July 20, 1988 PU 88-54 tor the uolf Course. Resolut:1ons 88-38 Agenda Number: Resolution 88-24 postponed consideration and/or granting of the bids (proposals) received on the Golf Course until September 27, 1988. Between July 20 and September 27, 1988, the Staff acquired information from First Southwest Company and Bond Counsel. In view of this inf~rmation along with problems relating to time constraints, the Council decided to pursue another avenue in connection with the design, construction and operation of the Golf Course. (We become the builder of the course and have it operated under management contract). All bids (Proposals) received July 20, 1988, should be rejected. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 88-38. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget _ - Other . ~~~- ~11l /~ epartment Head Signature ~ I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I RESOLUTION NO. 88-38 WHEREAS, the City received bids (proposals) in connection with the construction and operation of a golf course; and WHEREAS, such bids (proposals) were opened on the 20th day of July 1988; and WHEREAS, the council extended the time for comparison and consideration of said bids (proposals) by Resolution 88-24; and WHEREAS, the council finds that the time constraints and limitations in connection with acquisition of the land and public financing could not be met under any of the proposals presented at the opening of June 20, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. All bids (proposals) opened at the opening on June 20, 1988 are declared to be unsatisfactory for the above and other reasons and all bids (proposals) are rejected. PASSED AND APPROVED this 2nd day of Septelilier, 1988. APPROVED: Tommy Brown, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ,\ I Department: Public Works ~Ubject: Purchase of Right-of-Way from Jenny Coleman, et al I for the Purpose of Constructing Smithfield Road (Parcel 113) I I I I I I Ie ~ Council Meeting Date: 9/26/88 Agenda Number: PU 88-55 The staff has negotiated with Jenny Coleman and Lisa Whelchel Cauble to purchase right-of-way from their land that fronts on Smithfield Road. The negotiated price is $3,955 equaling $.70 a square foot for property that is zoned R-2. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of payment for right-of-way on Smithfield Road to Jenny Coleman and Lisa Whelchel Cauble in the amount of $3,955. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget ., Otheá ~ Finance Review Acct. Number 13-08-87-6050 Sufficient ~ailable , mance Director t.A r I'rient Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Pane 1 of I- ' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS --- RIGHT-OF-WAY I STATE OF TEXAS 4IIÞoUNTY OF TARRANT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: I I That we, Lisa Whelchel Cauble, a married woman dealing in her separate property and Jenny Coleman, a married woman dealing in her separate property, as Sellers, for and in consideration of the agreed purchase price of Three Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty-Five Dollars ($ 3,955.00), and upon all of the terms and conditions hereof, hereby grant, sell and convey to the City of North Richland Hills, a municipal corporation of Tarrant County, Texas as Buyer, a perpetual right-of-way for the purpose of constructing, improving, widening, maintaining and using a public street with drainage facilities as may be required and the further rights to construct, improve, operate and maintain water, sewer, or other public utilities in, under or upon said right-of-way, as described on the plat attached hereto, which plat is made a part hereof, and/or described as follows: I I (SEE ATTACHED PLAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION) I The agreed purchase price includes full accord, satisfaction and compensation for all demands of the Seller, subject also to the following special conditions, if any: I To have and hold the same perpetually to the City of North Richland Hills and its successors and assigns forever. . I Executed this the ~day of di ~i§Jl;è~~ 'sa Whelchel Cauble ~ ~~~ &¿~~.~ nny Col an I I 411ÞADDRESS OF GRANTEE: City of North Richland Hills I 7301 N.E. Loop 820 . North Richland Hills, TX 76180 SELLERS STATE OF CALIFORNIA I I COUNTY OF Los A~-Dl.QS I \ This instrument was acknowledged before me on the J.q--\-h day of August 1988 by k\~a.... LU~~lQ,,\,\Ql ~a.ub\~ I G 0FJ4'IC1AL SEAL .......'.. . CATHY SEEMAN ~. '. '. .;;: NOTARY PUBLtC - CAlfFORNIA Commissi ~ '~s: lOSANGÐ.ES OOUNTY , .....~,~ My comm. .pires MAY 2, 1992 ,5/,:) I q~ I STATE OF CALIFORNIA I COUNTY OF "4..3 {L~n4 ¿'-' v O~So~~ Notary Public,\ State of California II Notary's Printed Name: ~<Á- -\-'" LA <s'.e- e.. ~ CL ~ \ I I This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ~day of 1988 by ~ N '" 'I Cc> L" ¡..~ ,q 'i ( ~.e.1 Ý . ~ I .-It-11fO. I Commission Expires: Notary's Printed Name: @.'OFFICIALSEAL ,', ALVIN G. WEINST . . Notary Public-csmornia · . LOG ANGELES COUNTY , .. My Comm. e...O. Oct. 16. 1990 €' I Ar L I' < I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I --- O~WARD. INC. VOL. 8290. PG. 608 :> . ~ T. CO .. TX. .; 0 II: ~ Z þo. 1- In ?OI:\T OF M 'x LA.! 0 3EGINNING 18.31 I 4: > 0 ~ :J œ: .- I :I LI.. > 0 Q.. I 0 l- X -.J :J: ~ Q.. H W VI a: c ,0 a H iLl LL .C) In .; C) 0 I Q. cø 0 . - c '" IX ~ H IX LI.. :¿ :I: 0, t- W U1 ~ ØI ~ I ::a õT ..J 0:: &&J Õ n: .J W m '" t- < å z -l H iLl a: 0 u ..J < > W ~ 19.35 SCALE ~ II = lIO' PARCEL #~ T.A.D.. " ta. 'A3 5 89·081~~1I 1~.69 ~ LISA O. WHELCHEL AND JENNY F~ENCH. VOL, 7976. ?G. 1703 o . R _ i . CO '. TX 89·~0'q911 W 1&1.65 JOE V. TIRK ETUX WYNELL VOLUUE 5039. PAGE 83 ~ 85. DRTCT SKETCH SHOWING PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY KELLER-SMITHFIEL~ ROAD 7ARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS ( SEE FIELD NOTES ) D E ~ C RIP T 1 0 ~ ALL th:lt certain trôct ot:'" parcel 0; land he~ng ~~itU~lt~:d in thl' ':i 11ian Cnx Sur"èY, :\-3~'1, T.,:-rant County. "!'exas .ìnd bl'':l1g Ll purl ion O¡- that sa:-.L' t r.ìct described tp Lisa o. ~~helchl'l ¿!:1<1 .!('nn~' 1"';.-(.'nch, as rec()rded in VoJU;71(' 7976, rage lìOJ., Deed. ~l:cords, :'ar!"ant County, '~'('xas ;10Ù IH'ing ;.~()re' particularly described bv mete~·· and bounds as foJ lo\,'s :, ' BtGI~~INC at. the r.10St easterly Northeast Cl~::-ner or ·said tract, said point being o~n' the V(\st ri[;ht-of-tvay line of !~ellel--fr.d.th~-ield r.oad (a public. righ,t- of-wa~') ; TII[~:CE South 00 degrees 30 minu tes 49 sl'cond~3 '·.'es t along sa ill He·s t righ l-o;- -\.;ay line, 368.80 feet to the Southeast corner of said tract; THE~;CE South 89 degrees 10 minutes 49 seccnds ~'¡est along the South boundary line of stlid tract, 14.65 feet to a poi.nt at the beginning pf a non-tangent curve to the l.-ight whose radius point bea~-s !k'lrth 89 degrecs 20 minutl's 31 seconds E3st at 1784.CO feet; TIlE:~CE along said non-tangent curve to the' ri~ht th!"ough a cl'ntral an~le oî 01 ciegrees 03 minutes 21 seconds, an arc length of 32.88 feet to a point; I THE~~CE North 00 degrees 23 oinutes 52 seconds l:ast, 336.37 feet to a Pldnt on the most Easte~ly ~:0rlh boundary line o[ said tract; TIIE:\CE South 89 degrees 08 minutes 11 seconùs East along said North boundary line, 15.69 feet to the place 0; beginning and cuntaining O~ 1297 acre of Jand, Ille'n.' or less. PREPARED FRO~f P~tE'\·I\H'S SlT~\'[Y I\~D DOES :~OT CONSTlTl'Tf. A'J ON I I L DAVID C. MOAK SURVEYORS, INC. REG ISTERED PUBLIC SURV EYOR P. O. BOX 1034 2 68 - 22 II HURST. TEXAS 'O-ßr No. DATE l B<O-SSo TYPE 3 I- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I D t t Public Works 9/26/88 epar men: _ Council Meeting Date: eSUbjeCt: Approval of Change Order No. 5 - Grapevine Highway Agenda Number: PW 88-34 I Water System Improvements Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget ., Other. ? I I I I I I Ie I I I The proposed Change Order No. 5 is for the additional cost of boring under a brand new driveway to the Minit Lube at the corner of Ken Michael Drive and the Grapevine Highway. The bore will allow the driveway to remain open throughout the construction process. Change Order No.5 will cost $1,750. Original Contract Price Approved Change Orders To Date Change Order No.5 $311,111.00 19,597.50 1,750.00 Total Contract Price To Date Total Budgeted for this Project $332,458.50 500,000.00 Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of Change Order No.5 in the amount of $1,750. Finance Review REV Acct. Number 02-09-22-6700 SUfficien~AV~ - (211Z~ City Manager . Fmance Director ~ Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Paae 1 of 1 I þ · 1_~ ~w· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. D Œ © ~ DWlIg SEP , 5 1988 CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 14, 1988 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Tex. 76180 Re: 3-336, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GRAPEVINE HVY. VATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 Attached is Change Order No. 5 to the referenced project which has been executed by the Contractor, Circle 'c' Construction. This change order covers the cost of the boring and pressure grouting of the 12-inch diameter water line under Minit Lube's concrete driveway from approximate centerline station 80+46 to 80+96. This change order also includes the realignment of the 12-inch water, 11.63 right-south of previous alignment at approximate centerline station 81+13 to avoid a power pole and concrete parking lot corner. You may wish to place this change order on the next Council agenda for Council consideration of approval. After Council approval of this change order, please return a fully executed copy of the change order form to our office for our files. Please call if you have any questions. s~~~ L. S::"'~~ SUSAN L. SCHYINGER,G.C.E. SLS/ss/F3553C05A.RUNI/Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. Larry Jones, City Inspector 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I '~, ~ ~' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I K-E- F NO. 3-553 CHANGE ORDER NO. i TO THE CONTRACT WHICH WAS DATED JUNE 23 , 1988 (OWNER) ( CONTRACTOR) Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CIRCLE 'c' CONSTRUCTION CO. And For (Description of Project) GRAPEVINE HIGH\JAY WATER SYSTEM 1I1PROVEMENTS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: 1. Bore and pressure grout 12-inch diameter (Cl. 150) PVC water line under Minit Lube's concrete driveway from approximate centerline Station 80+46 to 80+9 6. 2. To avoid a power pole and Minit Lube's concrete driveway corner in the vicinity of centerline Station 81+13, construct 12-inch water line 11.63 feet right south and parallel to previous alignment (refer to revised Plan- Profile Sheet No. 13Rl). Add the following quantities to existing Contract Items: UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANT. 27: Bore & Pressure Grout Water Line L.F. <::."0 50 SUB-TOTAL ............................. TOT AL "$ 2~() ¡CQ $ 2SQ:), Oð Delete the following quantities to existing Contract Items: NO. Ir UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QU~~T. Concrete Pavement Replacement ~ 15.00 SUB-TOTAL ............................. TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST ............... EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT .............. REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT ...............þ TOTAL ($750.00) ($750.00) 1750 .00 $ Contract completion time shall be increased by ~ days because of this change. OF PROPOSED CHANGE: ~/fr;ht: , By: Date: , 19 88 c¡ ...14 By: OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Date: , 1988 Date: , 19 88 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I eDePartment: Public Works _ Council Meeting Date: Subject: Approval of Change Order No. 10 - Watauga Road Paving and Drainage Improvements 9/26/88 I Agenda Number: PW 88-35 I The subject change order is for reconstruction of a portion of the Meadowview Channel located east of Davis Boulevard and north of Rumfield Road in the Meadowview Estates. The channel is in need of immediate repair. Deterioration is apparently due to poor workmanship and excessive hydrostatic soil pressure. I The attached change order unit prices are greater than the unit prices bid in the original Watauga Road contract. The proposed channel reconstruction location is at least 2 miles from Watauga Road and the channel access is limited. We feel the greater change order cost when compared to the cost and based on the original bid prices is maybe reasonable when you consider we would have to pay for more plans and contract documents from the consulting engineer if we advertise and take new bids for the referenced construction. The time delay of taking bids may also allow for more channel liner to be damaged due to erosion. I I I The cost for Change Order No. 10 is $45,081.77. Original Contract Price Approved Change Orders To Date Change Order No. 10 $3,361,596.24 342,019.78 45,081.77 I Ie Total Contract Price To Date Total Construction Budget $3,748,697.79 3,703,616.02 I Funding Source: I Sufficient funds are available in Unspecified Drainage and will require a transfer as listed below: From To 13-90-99-4500 $ 15,000.00 Unspecified 1986 GO Drainage 13-01-86-6175 $ 45,082.00 13-90-99-4510 $ 30,082.00 Unspecified 1987 - Drainage Total $ 45,082.00 Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget _ Other /"; L/'¡ J /) ~ ..J'L£~ De GO ::I 'h (),,\T P .--' ,'// ,/ ,/ I nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Paa~ 1 of 2 I I Recommendation: I The staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 10 in the amount of $45,081.77 and the transfer of funds as described on the previous page. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS II I I I Ie I -...--r----__ r-____...__, e~ '-'~!1 ,/ ~~~--~F' ,/' 'I, ~~}. ~>-l~ .~ ;: \ "'-.>- / /I~, I II ",,' i ~ -, . >-"~ -. /~-:-...,.-_. ~ h -~- . '// - ~t' Jt- ~ · ~l~~.> /"'''-=~t-=:_~ . i. :f. '..' . . .!¥i, ~---; '. ,.::: -. :::¡. - :"tt., - . I :~~~J/ · :.. j~~~<::~ -: J J~{'~..:~-JI :~~)=J I ~~¥~1 I L. ~~-- ~, I j -4-.. - -, ---7 LDCÅTlötJ OF- p~p~ C HbrtJG€;.... ~ .".~~:. to f an ~ I ¡ ~ I -T-1 --r----1 - ~~~ ~'=---=:::::--...... ~/¿- , /-"/ ~~~~ 11 ' . " ;r - ", I i-I I I : I \--.. L.~ I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I I Ie I , - ~ KNOWl TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 20, 1988 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Tex. 76180 Re: 3-336, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS YATAUGA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE ORDER NO. 10 Attached is Change Order No. 10 to the referenced project which has been executed by the Contractor, Austin Paving. This change order covers the cost to reconstruct a broken portion of the Meadowview channel located east of Davis Blvd. and north of Rumfield Road. This channel was constructed several years ago by private developer, and the concrete riprap along portions of this channel has broken up due apparently to soil instability, erosion, and excessive hydrostatic pressures. As you instructed we have prepared plans for this repair work including a change order to the Yatauga Road contract to be performed by Austin Paving Company because of the good contract unit prices. However, we would note that Austin Paving is asking new unit prices on all pay items to do this work. The following is a comparision of the unit prices and total cost of the existing and new proposed prices: PAY ITEM EXISTING CONTRACT Unit Pre Cost PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER Unit Pre Cost. Quan t . Remove Cone. Flatw. 3,255 SF Saw Cuts 479 LF UncI. Chan. Excavat. 147 CY Class "A" Concrete 113 CY 2" Veep Holes 47 EA Berm. Sod (New Item) 1,395 SF $ 0.32 $ 1,041.60 1.55 742.45 2.48 364.56 162.69 18,383.97 9.52 447.44 2.10 2,929.50 $ 2.64 $ 8,593.20 3.19 1,528.01 12.98 1,908.06 262.00 29,606.00 11.00 517.00 2.10 2,929.50 Totals $23,909.52 $45,081.77 It may be possible to obtain better prices if you advertise for bids rather than do this work as a change order, but it will take longer and there will be additional engineering and other costs associated with preparation of construction plans and specifications required for bidding. Continued next page ... 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I I Ie I September 20, 1988 VATAUGA ROAD CHANGE ORDER NO. 10 Page 2 You may wish to place this change order on the next Council agenda for Council consideration of approval. After Council approval of this change order, please return a fully executed copy of the change order form to our office for our files. We will be present at the next Council meeting to discuss this change order. Meanwhile, please call if you have any other questions. A tJ/~ RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E. RYA/ra/F3336col0.runi/Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. Ken Matheson, City Inspector I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I I Ie I K-E-F NO. 3-336 CHANGE ORDER NO.~TO THE CONTRACT VHICH VAS DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 1987 Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (OYNER) And AUSTIN PAVING (CONTRACTOR) For (Description of Project) YATAUGA ROAD - PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: "ð Remove & Replace approximately 113 C.Y. of Class "A" Unformed Concrete in the Meadowview Channel as shown on Change Order No. 10, Sheet No.1. Add the following quantities to the existing Contract items: ITEM UNIT EST. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANT. 4P. Remove Existing Concrete Flatwork S.F. 2.64 3,255 SP. Saw Cuts for Removal of Concrete L.F. 3.19 479 31D. Unclassified Channel Excavation C.Y. 12.98 147 36D. Class "A" Unformed Concrete C.Y. 262.00 113 37D. 2" Dia. 'Weep Holes EACH 11.00 47 TOTAL COST 8,593.20 1,528.01 1,908.06 29,606.00 517.00 SUB-TOTAL ............... .... ..................... $ 42,152.27 Add the following new bid item to the existing Contract items: ITEM UNIT EST. TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANT. COST 47D. Bermuda Sod S.F. 2.10 1,395 $ 2,929.50 SUB-TOTAL ....... ............... .................. $ 2,929.50 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST .......................... $ 45,081.77 EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT.......................... $ 3.703,616.02 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT .......................... $ 3.748,697.79 Contract completion time shall be increased by (20) days because of this change. CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE: BY:~..d -~~ Date: ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE: dp/~ /~ , 1988 BY:~~~ 9- '20 Date: , 1 988 OVNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Date: , 1988 .' "', ~, ", '" I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I Department: Public Works _ Council Meeting Date: ~Ubject: Approval of Change Order No. 11 - Watauga Road Paving Agenda Number: I and Drainage Improvements The subject change order is for reconstruction of an existing 10" sanitary sewer line and extension of an existing 36" reinforced concrete storm drain. The 10" sewer was laid across Calloway Branch channel just upstream of Watauga Road too shallow for the proposed channel liner to be installed under this contract. The 36" storm drain needs to be extended with its overlaying flume to tie into the proposed channel liner and alleviate the possibility for future erosion problems. 9/26/88 PW 88-36 I I The cost for Change Order No. 11 will be $5,931.84. Original Contract Price Approved Change Orders To Date Change Order No. 11 $3,361,596.24 387,101.55 5..931.84 $3,754,629.63 3,748,697.79 I Total Contract Price To Date Total Construction Budget I Funding Source: I As indicated above, the proposed change order is for sanitary sewer line in the amount of $4,171.75 and drainage improvements in the amount of $1,760.09. Sufficient funds are available in Utility Unspecified and Drainage Unspecified and will require a Ie transfer as indicated below: From To 02-09-99-6750 $4,172.00 Sewer System - Unspecified 02-09-81-6750 $4,172.00 Watauga Road - Utility Adjustments 13-90-99-4400 $1,760.00 Unspecified 1985 GO - Drainage 13-01-86-6175 $1,760.00 Watauga Road - Drainage Const. Total $5,932.00 Total $5,932.00 Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 11 in the amount of $5,931.84 and the transfer of funds as described above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget _ Other (~¡ . L,.·' ' J I ~": , .,.",~J" ¿,Æ:.' . ~ ~/Oep ,/ GO ês REV Acct. Number S~ffi~~nd ~ See above . Finance Director I t Head Signatu e CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Paae 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 12, 1988 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Tex. 76180 Re: 3-336, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS YATAUGA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE ORDER NO. 11 Attached is Change Order No. 11 to the referenced project which has been executed by the Contractor, Austin Paving. This change order covers the cost to reconstruct an existing lO-inch sanitary sewer line across the Calloway Branch Channel north of Vatauga Road because of conflict with the proposed concrete channel liner. This conflict was discovered after the existing sanitary main was uncovered during the channel excavation work. Also included in the change order is extension of an existing storm drain and drainage flume to the proposed concrete channel liner in the vicinity of the 10-inch sanitary sewer main. You may wish to place this change order on the next Council agenda for Council consideration of approval. After Council approval of this change order, please return a fully executed copy of the change order form to our office for our files. Ve will be present at the next Council meeting to discuss this change order. Meanwhile, please call if you have any other questions. ~,N w. {)u~ RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E. RYA/ra/F3336coll.runi/Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. Ken Matheson, City Inspector 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I' , Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I I Ie I K-E- F NO. 3-336 CHANGE ORDER NO. 11 TO THE CONTRACT WHICH WAS DATED SEPTEt1BER 14 , 1987 Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AUSTIN PAVING (OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) And For (Description of Project) WATAUGA ROAD - PAVING AND DRAINAGE INPROVEI4ENTS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: 14 Construct 105 L.F. of 10" sanitary sewer, extend 36" RCP and concrete flume to proposed channel liner as shown on Sheet No. 33R. Add the following quantities to the existing Contract items: NO. 80. 360. UNIT PRICE 41.77 162.69 TOTAL $ 1,044.25 715.84 $1,760.09 DESCRIPTION 3611 Dia. RCP 3000 PSI Unformed Concrete SUB- TOTAL UNIT L. F. C. Y. QUANT. 25 4.40 .............................. Add the following new bid items to the existing Contract items: NO. ?S. 8S. 480. 490. UNIT PRICE 20.35 1,485.00 385.00 165.00 TOTAL 2,136.75 1,485.00 385.00 165.00 $ 4,171.75 $ 5,931.84 $ 3 tt 7 48 tt 697 . 79 $ 3,754,629.63 DESCRIPTION UNIT 1011 Dia. PVC S.S. (DR 35) L. F. 4' Dia. Drop Manhole EACH Remove Existing Headwall EACH Cut off & Grout in Prop. 36" RCP EACH QUANT. 105 1 1 1 SUB- TOTAL .. ........... ..... ..... .... ... TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST ................ EXISTING CONTRACT Ar,10UUT ............... REV ISED CONTRACT A~10UNT ................ Contract completion time shall be increased by (10) days because of this change. CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE: By: ._~___ B. J:- - rtram, ExecUtive Vice President Date: Septanber 71 , 19 88 ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE: By: ~~ tI~1 Ott-:. c¡ - /3 Date: , 1988 OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Date: , 1988 I . . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: Public Works 411.bubject: Approval of Change Order No. 12 - Watauga Road I Paving and Drainage Improvements _ Council Meeting Date: 9/26/88 PW 88-37 Agenda Number: I The subject change order was presented to the CIP Committee at the September 6, 1988 meeting. The change order includes the installation of two (2) median openings on Watauga Road to serve the North Park Plaza Shopping Center to the north and the Kroger Shopping Center to the south. The median openings are located approximately 500 feet and 700 feet from the east curb line of Rufe Snow Drive. I I The cost of the two (2) median openings with left turn lane, $10,773.37, will be paid by the two (2) shopping center owners prior to construction of said medians. I Original Contract Price Approved Change Orders To Date Change Order No. 12 $3,361,596.24 393,033.39 10,773.37 I Total Contract Price To Date Total Construction Budget $3,765,403.00 $3,754,629.63 I Funding Source: Although the median openings will be paid by the two shopping center owners, the budget for Watauga Road should be increased accordingly. An accounts receivable 4IÞ of $10,773.37 will be set up to record the amount due and once payment is received the amount will be recorded back to the Unspecified Street CIP. The transfer is indicated as follows: From To 13-90-99-4300 $10,774.00 Unspecified 1986 GO - Streets 13-01-86-6150 $10.774.00 Watauga Road Construction Recommendation: It was the recommendation of the ClP Committee and staff that proposed median openings with left turn lanes be approved for the two shopping centers as shown on the attached plan view, approval of Change Order No. 12 in the åmount of $10,773.37, and approve the transfer of funds as described above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget _ Other' J ,~JtÆ1: / epart .'----.-/ I GO Acct. Number Spp ;:¡hovp SU~iCie~Avai lable 777~~ - /~ /(\-£ a City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ., --- ,Finance Director Paae 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie il I I I I I I Ie I , .. KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 21, 1988 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Tex. 76180 Re: 3-336, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WATAUGA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 Attached is proposed Change Order No. 12 to the referenced project for your review and approval. This change order covers the cost to add two (2) new median openings for the shopping centers located north and south of Vatauga Road and east of Rufe Snow Drive. The total amount of the proposed change order, based on revised quantities and existing contract unit prices is $10,773.37. You may wish to place this change order on the next Council agenda for Council consideration of approval. After Council approval of this change order, we will send it to the Contractor, Austin Paving, for review and approval. Ve will be present at the next Council meeting to discuss this change order. Meanwhile, please call if you have any other questions. ~t(J. Qk · RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E. RYA/ra/F3336coI2/Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 , , f f : I e - I I I - _e - ~z \ ~ a: cC ¡a. Ix Il- ia: ¡a 1:G: I " J J i ~. , -OH ~3SNns CJ cC N c( =n ..J III d) c.. 1-":> ..! ffi ~ CJ \P CJ I Z 2 ¡¡: j ~ ~ :c~ (þ '-.J +¡~ a I , t . ) I 11--1 ~ lI\ ~ ~ -1:10 MONS 3:1nH Ht IIJ - ,~- ¡'::J a: III ... Z ~ ~ ~ z o ¡: ~ a. 41 0 :z: CI) ~ Lù a: :::)(11) CJ ¡¡: z CJ - en w Q Q W en o Q. a a: a.. en w - I- a: w a.. a a: 0- w ..I UJ - ..J £C c( CJ j c: .. ~ f t ~ ~ 1)1 IIi! t1J I j i Q II: I. . I. I I I I I I I -- I· I I I I I I I· I :~ ~ ii, iIL:-U ~~!II I !'~~ii !! Ii J I ~ I~~~t:! :!Iii. "~...h iI1i!I' !!'!~ I I i:I!;I~ . I liHiii i i ~ ,il;;d ¡ ii n~ !I.~:I~ II: II~ I;...!~ I~ '14 f:li;.i I ~I~ ï ~ ......... . ~ ~~ '" ,~ \II ~ ~ ~t \\t <::) it~ ~~ \&¡ ~a \J) ~ ~ -=c . .. ::¡: i i ~ ~ t( \U ~ I \!) <:) ~ k ~ ~ ~ ...... <:) }~ \\. ~ ~ ~~ ~ '- .... ~~ 1 ( ~~ I Ii i i! .. i¡ / E . ~;æ i~;1 I;I~ !Ig !~I!. .I!~ I,· ~¡2¡" Ii;;! ~:J:!¡ // \U ~ q '" ~ , ~ \) , tt I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I· I I I I I I Ie I K-E-P NO. 3-336 CHANGE ORDER NO.~TO THE CONTRACT VHICH VAS DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 1987 Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (OVNER) (CONTRACTOR) And AUSTIN PAVING For (Description of Project) VATAUGA ROAD - PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the Generàl Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: 16 Add new median openings from Sta. 4+65 to Sta. 5+20 and from Sta. 7+14 to Sta. 7+73.7 as shown on sheet no. 50 of the construction plans. Also construct 2-inch and 6-inch PVC conduits under proposed median openings. Delete the following quantities from existing Contract items ITEM UNIT EST. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANT. 1C. a-inch Concrete Paving S.Y. 13 (87) 3C. 6" Curb and 12" Gutter L.F. 4 (917) 18P. 4" Thick Median Concrete S.F. 2 (1,025) 29P. Type I-C Reflective Buttons EACH 3 (10) TOTAL COST (1,122.30) (4,098.99) (1,640.00) (26.30) (6,887.59) SUB - TOTAL ........................................ Add the following quantities to existing Contract items ITEM UNIT EST. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANT. IP. Unclass. Street Excavation C.Y. $3.75 297 6P. 8-inch Stabilized Subgrade C.Y. $1.17 765 7P. Lime for Subgrade C.Y. $79.29 15 18P. 4" Thick Cone. Median C.Y. $ 1 . 60 1520 29P. Type I-C Reflective Buttons C.Y. $2.63 12 lC. a-inch Thick Cone. Pvmt. C.Y. $12.90 602 3C. 6" Curb and 12" Gutter C.Y. $4.47 708 6V. 2-inch PVC Conduit C.Y. $3.61 90 26V. 6-inch PVC Conduit C.Y. $8.00 90 SUB-TOTAL ..................... ... .......... ...... TOTAL COST * $1,113.75 $895.05 $1,213.14 $2,432.00 $31.56 $7,765.80 $3,164.76 $324.90 $720.00 $17,660.96 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST .......................... $10,773.37 EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT.......................... $ REVI SED CONTRACT AMOUNT .......................... $ * Based on previously approved change orders at time of approval of this change order. Contract completion time shall be increased by days because of this change. I · , ,'. Ie I I I I I I I Ie I, I I I I I I Ie I VATAUGA ROAD CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 continued CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE: By: Date: ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE: By: Date: OVNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Date: , 1988 , 1988 , 1988 I ~ + ( ) ()/~ - . .. \- .- C) ~ :! :: CI' . ~ I to- .. . I fIØ C ;(~ ~ ~ ~ CII. ~ .. ' . ..J : . v CII2 :z 8 - V\ .. Þ-4 ~ V ..J an :5 .., ... ù ~ 1 :a > A. ,.'j § . ~..~ . ~\ ~li ~ ~ ... to> ~ Q ':! ~ CI) Ie ... Þ-4 Þ-4 . V cw ... :a:: w co ~ ,..., ~~I, ...i I' ~~ I .~ t- + ~ ~ ~ , , , I I I , I- , , , , , , ~- ~ ~ j l.}J< 'I '~..~ '> I~'" #..~~..Y/ A'~~~ <"~~'~"?\ v-,~ .:: r - II~... v:.'&a~_~JI' .~~~~ ... i '<, )'" , 'S "'I ! .' ".-1 . :~4 .~ .~'. ' ~~~~. ,4 "0 )~ß~'I L:. ~'{., .. : T...... "'I ,1"t.. .. ~~ . IØ \\.of:!.·r;-; ¡. J 0" ~ . , J~ '" I' ~ L- ~ ." ~ \: s ~ ~' ¥'~~ I t I .. . I Ir I. . ,. ~_ t J ~ ~. , t, ,. I " 1. I -., . ~ t.. , ---=-_........ ....J.III.... L~' 11 ~ " & I. ~ it J~::A 7l~1 - .'. T~~iJf~-=r ...""~';o; -n~;'::L:'"':¡"· .~ ,::.: I~ :~. ~ · ~~/..' I J: '~':~'--~I ; 1.. : ~ X/fjT. S"'W.L ~ 'ø · .,. 1... -I TII '2 ¥ _ . I 1 o ~~, 1J~ I.... ~ e ,: .. - : ~ ~ l ~ ft.. (IV ~ '~J .... : T. ,..! .. ... " ." . 17\ ... · Q \J \!I ÿ.. 4t' 1'. 'Z~. c. " · ... ~ 601. IS A.c ~"Z~ C'" . .~ .... ~ I A& r- ~.. ~.. 7 n."'" .'" c" ,. '2" .. ~ ~ t ~ ~. ~ · ..., ,. Of- ,." ,"'1...., '':1 . ~~":' f ,....-.J.. lIt,..·~ · " ,.. '2~ ... I ' .'. .:' :; ~ · '.~ A& ó';' ~. ~_. ' ~.. _ ,. '20<. ".'110'.' .,. '20": '< :.. ~ "0 ,.: + 'YO .. ~ '.. __ ,, ~.n .~~"., ..... ~ ~~"t" 1.'~A&. .þ ~.2 I~ ~: ~~, ~. i \~..~~::,Þ I i I :,~ ;\~~~ ~~. \. ) ~ J~' 4.c 6.c . '2 JlIII ~ , 1"'-' _ "., :, It ~ ., ...,.n ~.. ::;; f.:f,.\~ '" . .... 0 ~ ~ .. .. ,.7- TIt "'1' 'Ye _,. S· h' I TJ. ~ ' :\1,,/ \.. .... Þ:p\; ;~ '.. ~ I ';' ~~ ~ .,.,,...,;..... ~~~ .... ..... ...:?: ~:: ~ . ._'" I / ".... ~ (i)'I'''''' fp ..,~-~ ~ ::3 VI ~ lID' ~ .. !~ · ',';' ", ;:;.Wï,T ..,. CQ,.., '4' " ~~~r ,.... ~~~t /~ II> ~ ~ ~ ~"2:..-!L,....!: : .. 4 " I .... TII ." . ... . .,...'., ~ 15 _ I\, 141.. ..... · · ...., '2... .' 0' ~ ,.1' :' 5 . e z ~ T'''~. ~ n. - . ~ 4' ~ __, ~. _ .... ,~ - 4 · l ; ... ... ... 40 .. . 18 :\ ~ \:~'I :, ~ ~ Ù ~ I ~ Toll ...... : '. '/,f>?J , , , . 4:~ 5 t~ 'n 40. t ~ I · ,..J ~¡Pj~. - - t ~ 2'....:.,,, ...... ~. ~"y:~ ;D':'~¡'~" 45 . 't. ~~..£\ ~ I ~ ð H-."":. i ~. - ---¡ \) 0 ~ 1· ....... 10 · · ...~ - .: - "\..-,..r ~..," 1:5 ~ Ü ~ Q .... I~ # .. · ': _. i'''' '1~" 11. I I ; "ill ". · ~ , .... In . ~ ~ , ,,' 1';;(..-.-...... 11 ' ,. " . t 11. fI t5 ,e ., ~. . --.::I.......L. ~ ~o .. ~ N............. ': .. ,..,.,. It' Eîi PifiJ - _ ",'. , ~~ . ,.. ...2 "\ ~ '" · " l ........ /L -....... - ;;- IIID~4T" 110. ."".........., ~?\.::- ~ 3 \ ~ \\¡ ~ I · t ....~ , ). ".. f..... ....r:. ,. '. i .....~ l~' ~ g"", ,'" ' I ~- '1 ~ r 1 .. ... " ',. 2 J ~, ~.1 ~ ,; ."if{ ~ '\i ':¡;; '. ~-;r:'\ t 7 ~... 't-: ~ · ~f.¿..!.11 '. I ~. - - .. -;-- .. . ..~.. ~. ., ~tt' ,18~1 '':,. ~. 0) I~ · ;. .--¡] .. ~2 ".I '. . to "' 4: S 6. '2J: ,.. I ~. t~ " L-..>.U. ~ ~.. ~.....u.. I , ~ .. .' 1 n... !\ 2A :L· ~ ~'2 ..I.S .. .1~~1:. I .;; I~: ~ I~ 1-::-1 õõ:..o~- 01' - - ',. , ......1 QI~ OQ. ~.. Iø ~. f J. :- . '2 ' t,.. Ii I· I ~ 'ç k ($7; I_ "p:z¡. -'IU.- "....... (,7 ~ .; ~... !. .¡. ~~ 1 · .,~ ;~ t7'~ ~ t ~s :,~: ~" 4 It. I , ., ~ -:p' r r-'I Yrl -.. ~~ \1' L:.' aJ , ~ -. , 'i: '~.' " ~ 0) .' 20 .." ~ J<. 3 . . ID'..~.... . : -,. -~ .... ~... I·.. 1 ~ ~. d~ ~ 10 .., -." 11 ,- ~ -;--: ~ ' ; Ie "') ~ I' ,.. )C ,~~~ . _ o---~ ~~:IP'''·· ~~'. -...' - -.. -,. ~ - ~ '''1(j¡ "; ~ '~, ~~ II II : 11> . ok ~ ." ~ . ~ ....~~ . IS ,4 .1 ,.1 ~ "I I 1 11 ..: ,.. ~¡, _ . _ ":.0- ~~~ ,II ,f ,~ "r ì ,- II ... ... :.. ~~ . I~ " ~ 'Z~ 55" 1 ~? 4 ., 10 J 41) ~ 1" ~ ., ; ~. ... _~ ¡it .. . .. .. - I II ~_., In . .~'...~ ,S.. No: ~ :[7 .,." ~1 . J ~ 10 c~ Ie ' I. .. -,0:- .5 ' ~..., ". ...... . , .", --< I '. ,. · 111. I ' . Co ~ I~ :. fS; I " ';i 5 .. ., ,.. ~ n.. ~~ .1 ~.. ~. ~ ~ :' "'3'" . ..... ~~.. " .' ....~.:..: I ~ I..... if ,. ~.: ' to: - ::~.:. .:. .. ~ .. &6 ... '" ", '"1' .5,,, IS' No. I · · ~ .~, ,,'. at J T Te t t 11', ,-._:~. '. 't'"'.... .!'!:' ~ t_ ....::... ""i"t\I-" ~ . ~\ , i ,........., \ I. ~ ': :: ~ ~.:, 2':e /2. 2' I ~ ;. ;~ " ~ 'I ..' I ..'~! I" 2 1 J i 4 1· L. :'I~ ... ..' ... ~ ~ ~~I. _ -'UO~,...q 011 -. ~ ^ .. · ~. ~. '. ~ r '"Ii" ¡. ~ V4~~V'.W 0.. · . ". r----':'-" J .... . I.... r .. I --- I' 111 ,. L.. j - .... L -:-- ~ '.. J.> It __ ~~ ,r~ .. I ... .. ,..' -----.J 2.' ... ~ :" ~ 1 : ,,;, ~I ~-""; i:"'@-. ---.: I~~~~" SI> :M 8~ .,.A' :1- 4S · 5 . 8 ,I··S r. ~ --.:..... it ~ "~J~~'Z .,¡ ~ It e ... .. ~ ~I~..!, 7 ~r .' -q;;:" , ',-~. · ---"- > . '. . ~ .,.......u1l<'"".1 . . . ~o. ' :" J I.. \l' ...; -=:'. e[ _ ~ ~ ~ :'tI , . )~'" II" '] - ffi'7" ~ , ,;, .. 50.. ~ i~ ~ _:': ;ï¡-~~::;~ 9': "J.' ,~ I~." - ~'. :... ~ '= \I:' 2 . .A~O 1 0 ,L....t¥~,.,f.r1 ~ ~ tr~ 1o ~ _ ~ n . ,~...., ~. I ~ ----..-- .... '0' J_ oJ' I.. ~ L - ' . ., I. u ~ ., ... . I:·" ~ ~ · T. '" '7-,[ ~ Jj' ~" '.. 2 II ~ .. . ____ M~A~rl,i' ¡];,v/~fÌ~~E /'1~~..,.1i.~.) 1 F...,.. 'T~~ . J . 7r. ~ ,1, T. ,a. '. - I -..- .~ ~ ,.~:~- ~~~~~ ~ I.A T. ~~:c ~~ I "":-2#.. J ~D7 ~ I TD r? , ..... ,2Ac 11.J I ~ ." f 1'''1,,1, " - I "2 ~ .: S C. ~ , ~. ~ .~ :~~.' _'t¡,~,O ~ -: ."' ~ .1:'~ -, ' ~'.: ~ oJ T. «. ... , , I "'4 ,.. A. .... . 1 II '2A 1 49... ~ "'" .. . .' ~.. ~ I~ 'A ): . .. ,... "" i -..aa. S. I. 6.&. w .. Ta"wl J '~Ac ~ ..... I.. - ~ ' o '. . ..' ~'. ' ~, . . 'ø . i\ T. J.~ : , . .".. ...... " '" - "r , l- I I I I I I I a- I' I I I I , I 1M::\,. .. ~ , 1 1 , ~...... if v.~~~ .. ~~ ... 1 ~~, ,,0 \)0 ,.0 I~ I. I. _; 14 ~ I I. Y . "" \..S ...) . ~IC." 's (_ . II .,; J"~.. ,'. ( ¡~ "<¿ ,~:#£~ 'þ " .~ '\. ~ 'i; V ~ .. ., ~~ ~~ '~À:·~~~I~X~ ~~ l~j · - · ~ ~ {- J · . I - rw,~_ . .¡ ~ l'; ,_ .J" Je "'. I . P¿ .... ~ I ... ~I ·...la..~.~Þ' . D". ... ,. ! & , ,~ t . ~ ~ . 1 . ï I j - .... a . ... ... -., . .... ",1- ..... . Ü 1 1 ., . ., .. , & - ~. J . 10 . . 1.0..- I I ~ I h :~ --- ~; ..... . . · ~ ~ J -'1 .s .. 0.. ," ~_ . ItI ,.. r .~ '" - r .. , ~ fi@-tc ~ 9 ,^, ~~~~ .. ~ø:-, .(;> .¡~ .." ~ ~ I . 0 ~ e "" ~'I '1 .0 .. .r £'t1' .., Q" J . ., 4 l' 1, !~ c '" .It .. ... 1 '- IJ / . ,~ :. , : · : ~ ., J J.. ... .- I.~ ,. ~ .1 I... ~ j , . · . -, f·-' ~ ~ ~ -: -; ·11, ~ ~. : _ 1 1~.~ ~ ~~ðV: : ~ : r~~~· ::".~. ; {. ~ " '4 L 1'· L~ .. . .. . :0 , . I~ " r:.. 0 " ~~ - ~ .---~p = ,. II _ ii.:J.·.. , . or - I - ~ 1 ..- ¡¡. ~ It ," 11,' 2 ~ S ~ ~ ~ 4. ~ ~ J t:~ 04 ,,~ _~Þ.JO t ~ ~ I ~,~ · 'a .. r . J "'\If. II. , ..' .. ~. J ~= .~.. , 1 i---- I. ~ J ~ · ~ ~ .t....J S ~ 4t ~ 10 C. I' ~--.~ , ., ~~. - ~ ~. · · · ~~t S- ~ · ~~. .J <[...;;;: , · . ~ ~- 1q ~ ~ -.7-t ...1..~ ~ ~ · - ~. 't ,. t' 4 J --it to ~ __ ..~ . L-...ML...: . 116-· I_ I- ~ II , ~ ~Er~')VI1"'W Ie t" ~ 10 ~ f'l II ~ - -.,.. ,. ¡io,..:..r~. _ ... .;.!.::.:.:!. tIV Oil _ _ _ _ S_.. ,MC -., W ",AttA~1 SJ!'f - ¡'D" _ _ ,~ -:- ---;.- -. ~ ,.., H .. --r- '''6);ïST. (i.~~"":'li1 ~- "..." A t to. i ~ ~,J ra..a..... ~ II..- #4' ,;,\ ;¡ _ .. . . _ \:.J · I.... ~ ~ ¡ ~ ;;. -- _. .. ..~. 3·561 MISC. 1987 VATER AND SEVER IMPROVEMENTS I . f ~ .... n. VANCE/DALBY/CUMMINGS SEVER EXTENSIONS V. I; i ,..~ -,. / ~~~ .~ : t ~.,,' al~· Line "A" 6" Di.., pve, 810 L.P. ~_ '!: ~ .... .. E ,..... .. ...:>T S .0 Line "B II · 6 " D1.., pve, 215 L. P . a Line "C" 6" D1.., pve, 120 L.r. / ~..~ ...-~,~\ ~' Line "D" 6" Dl.., pve, 439 L.P. ...... ... ~ ." "~.., ~,,%- -BJ ~.~ I ... ..., . or ~ ... \:9) - ~ * k~'" ~~ ... ~ ~ ~.. ~o. ~a;:-,_~;. r ~ .. ~ ..-~ ....~ - ~ -~- '. .. ~¡:/ ~ -;Z?i:. .. ~ -,--_....t;,'" ~ ... . r. . '"'t·:t~ r .'. I ~.. .., .. .. ., ..' . :"1,AI , ~ ., . ~ ~. ~ j ..., 0 " 4'. I ~ Þ.~"4" ') .. .. I~ ! ~ _.~ . . ~ ~ ~ _~ Ie. /Aa' J ., .. '7 ,-... ·n ~ -k . J.& ÌI r..,' O)~ J I . J .1 I ,.... ., i l ., ../.. ... ¡ ~ ä) .. T~ .. ~ ."... f3 I"' . . I.: .. I r~ 1.& . ~ ..1.. '...-~ ; 1, i ~ T~ ~ .. " ,~ l'. ~ " 1 ~ - · '.. ..... . \,.. :f.:·,ì t iã fJOT ,tJ THIC; . . , t Cc~A(.,r -It- _t~h ..-- >. . ': 'A.. ~ ¿;~ _~5·tJ/~~~~~ ... ~"r ~', ¡ø - .. .. ~ '. .z I. . " " ..#. I ·C I.r ..t .., '.. '"'1 '4 +" ~. ~~ .. c , ~, I ' ~J r .. - \ ~. , ~ .~ ..- r? ~J II , ~. t~ ~~ ~I' ~~ ~ ·t oJ. .. It .. ~ J ~ '8 .. 1 . '0 ...... '-~ ~ '- ~ '- , II , , , , , , , " ..,..__....._,,_~r-.. 111 '" ~ "2 "-' ' TQ .,..~ ...' . Tu.c..,. e ~ ~Çtf- \...0@Þ , ~\t. )" ~ ...- O~" 'JJ. .t4 <D J UII.. a( QIOð£ LIII .,. .. I 6~~ °0 ~~. t~ ~JC"~, . S'~~ MISC. 1987 VATER AND SEVER IMPROVEMENTS BOLDER ESTATES SEVER SYSTEM EXTENSION ,... II. . 1'1 ~&. + 11 : ¡ " Ta "a ,-'- .... Ita 3·561 ,,. . 8" DI.., PVC, 2,420 L.r. .. I'ZA.. Te. ..0 U.5~ Ac. ", A. f'Jo~Tµr='~L.D t::> ~ C3. «:- -t2A S,..2 ~.. -It '.U4c. l6 . ... ,. .,.. 4~4c ;þ'MÎ...,.: - l' þ,.f.. - <It.. ~ T. 74,(,. ~o ., -",. KI"WILL + '. t"t,. J ,.,., , Lee: GoØDMA JJ ............... ---- ............... ~ I (.. S -.....--.. ............... /.' ~ 0 1\1 ............ ______ ............. ............. '- ..A --......... ____ .., --- ____ ~ ~ÂA ____ " c.. t'. c ------ ~ A.., "'ENÞfi~D,J ___ _____ ---- --- .. .. - ~ -"'., ~ 'I' . '1 '~'1. ,.1~~t TQ 154, 7. A.· /'... "-, ooJ .\ /. I Ie I I I I I I I I I· I I I I I I I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 88-39 Date: September 26, 1988 Subject: 1988 Miscellaneous Street Reconstruction and Repair Project - Presentation of Plans The staff would like to present the subject plans to Council and get their informal approval to proceed with advertisement for bids. Attached is a letter from the consulting City Engineer describing any "zingers" that the staff felt the Council should be apprised of. Respectfully submitted, Gregory V?~' Director' 0 , / L// GWD/ds ~t ns, lic Works/Utilities ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I, Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 20, 1988 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-347, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MISC. STREET & DRAINAGE PLANS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL Ye are requesting that the referenced project be placed on the September 26, 1988, Pre-Council Meeting Agenda for Council consideration of approval of the construction plans. Transmitted herewith is one (1) blueline set of the construction plans. This project includes reconstruction of six (6) streets with new curb and gutter, asphalt pavement and underground storm drainage as required. Also included in this project is curb and gutter repair and replacement on six (6) additional streets.· Ye would note that new sidewalks are not budgeted or included in any of these streets. However, replacement of existing sidewalks, as required, is included. The following is a list of the streets included in this project along with estimated costs: RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ESTIM. COST 1. Yillowcrest from Tourist to South City Limits 2. Richland Plaza Drive from Billye Faye to Broadway 3. Mackey Drive from Riviera to South Dead End 4. Terry Drive from College Circle to Circle Drive South 5. Crabtree Lane from Turner to the North Dead End 6. Payte Lane from Turner to the North Dead End $ 218,000 198,000 150,000 80,000 125,000 135,000 Paving Costs (Utilities not included) $ 906,000 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 20, 1988 PLANS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL Page 2 REPAIR PROJECTS 1. Little Ranch Road at Dana 2. 4900 Lariat Trail 3. Marilyn Lane from Redondo to Canton 4. 7617 Teresa Court 5. 7112 Jeffrey Court 6. Little Ranch at Sean Drive 4,600 14,000 18,000 9,000 7,400 14,500 Total Estimated Repair Cost $ 67,500 The following schedule is suggested: Council Approve Plans First Advertisement Date Second Advertisement Date Open Bids Council Award Contr. Pre-Construction Conf. York Order Date Estimated Completion Date September 26, 1988 (Pre-Council) October 12, 1988 October 19, 1988 October 26, 1988 November 14, 1988 (Regular Meeting) December 7, 1988 December 19, 1988 October 19, 1989 (10 Months) The following is a list of "zingers" and other items for the Council's information: 1. Only existing sidewalk, which is in conflict with proposed curb and gutter grades is being replaced under this contract. No new sidewalk is proposed for those parkway areas which presently do not have sidewalk. None of the streets included in this project are located adjacent to any schools. 2. Solid sodding with Bermuda or St. Augustine is provided for all parkways which are disturbed during construction operation.s. 3. Yater lines are being replaced on all street reconstruction projects except on Richland Plaza Drive. Only a short water line segement exists at Richland Plaza Drive near Billye Faye Drive. All proposed water line replacements will be located under the new pavement to avoid conflict with other existing underground utilities except in Crabtree and Payte. On these two streets, the proposed water lines will be located in the west parkway behind the curb. Only a few existing trees and schrubs in these parkways will be disturbed. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 20, 1988 PLANS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL Page 3 5. An underground "french" drain is proposed along Yillowcrest Drive just behind the curb and gutter in the west parkway. This perforated subdrain is provided to help protect the pavement subgrade by intercepting the ground water flow before it passes under the street. Ye are not aware of any ground water problems which may exist on any of the other streets included in this project. Some of the rock walls and other landscape structures which extend out into the right-of-way may be disturbed during construction of the proposed french drain. 6. Plans will be submitted to all the other utility companies for their review and identification of any potential conflicts with their existing or future facilities. Ye do not anticipate any conflicts, however, since we are replacing existing curb and gutter and paving at about the same location and grade. 7. Asphalt pavement is proposed on all streets because of the cheaper construction costs and convenience to adjacent property owners. Local residents can drive on new asphalt streets sooner than they can on concrete streets. Please call if you have any questions. ~~ RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E. RVA/lld/Enclosures cc. Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance I Ie I City of Keller I I ~~c- _- _--" --oJ ~ ----, ~T ~: ~ _-..-:~===-_7--=-~~ ~====:" ..... ..... .., --, =t~2 ~ ~~~ .... '," I ~- ~.:- // .- , ~ . ., { : ~, -ø . o II: ., c .... ..J I r ! 1- .. _'_~ ~ _ f ::r'~ /: - = :::";~ ~v~ ¡:------;. '" - :..~ ~r. I i~~~;1¡ - ~ ...-:tJI ~ ~~~:_u -,c¡' .-~, , . : II ~~:J'-~ ~:.~ ~ _ ~~:-: 1:-' çf-~~: ~::.C ::~ - --I ~ ~~'--'-~- r- -=~~ ~~ ._~" :-_ ~~~\% ti~~ -: ~~¡;:_¡¡~~ ~.. ~4lt&~, i ~]!~ ';~£pf- í~ _ _ ~~~ ." S,·:~:t:'~fI: : ~~~ La~¥, -:~f: 1:.=.~1M -~ P ~å-~'-~. . f~l' #~:~ - ,/\.,~~ -, J::=-=" --= -!.!Yt~e· :'.L ;-'.\ ,/./~~=: ~:~~-=:1 ~-~~"'l- .-,JI~ ~-'- ,,"j~~:::: - :J: --.----r:..';;;;;;;..l ., -'-=-= ~... -~ <=- ~11_ . ~{~. - ~~t -~"~~~ - ~\>:'--~-.~-~:~~/-~~{f= ~ ~~~ ~..¿-~~i~~t~:~{1=~~~~~~ (~~~r~~I~¡'~~.--' ~ :~'.-Eo £.'.-. \.. ... --. ., -. ftfj~lr;- ... ',', - '.' _. ~ ..-------t..~ t:.if.~~ ;.~~~. ,,;~~'- _ _ ~:~~~t~~:~!;L~~~~~.~';~_ I:;~ _\ i c; 5 ..- - - -I,. I '';''/1'' '.' r...., ,. ,,'-_ - -' ~. r:. ~. -.. " I ~,. . ,', - , " '" . ~ . =':= ·:·t~:~:~ ~.¿"~.\ ':"'E:( // "£f<._ _ ~~_ ',. ~ __ .1- __,... I I~~; ~.. 'c~~ . '.i;:; ,~ .-.<#f' _ ./,7:- ~ ~._ ' ._ - 1 -- . I . · -- I'... - - · · - .. . - -- , na-.al ~ -. 'I - .... .. j-': ~., . . - - - - - __ ":- - - _ Te r ry U1. . ~IV e - ~ r·=-· ~ ~.. ! ~i~-i,- ~1' - ~::'~::~~='. . -. _":'. . ~' - -_ -"'t '1' \ ~t I~~~~ :~~~~t:.~, '._-::-' I - I ,. I' .. .,w,.-- · ~. ,~,..,..~:-.t. ~l ~ . . I ~ - ., '.,;or.;..', "'. . t,- - - · .-J ' Q , I'';' \ ,:.-' '~. . ....._'--:-=.. --, ;'-' " t ~-~ : i. r' - .. ..,.. - ~. _= --..:.;.: Ii::' -.- I -s: J ... ... . \ \.. _ _ ..,_._ - ~ . ---a · · .".. , · ~ I i -, I ., .,!-...I t-!_~.. 1- _ _" ~ I. . ..... . -- ----' - .. .... I .1 I I I='- . I I ) = ~ -~ \. .. J i--=-- - - .. ' . J t· a: t i ~ 9p; Êö~;;.;.T,'~:"~_I- __ ~ ' -: _ r · '--' I.B. 820 ---. - . " ,. I'¡ ~~ '.:~~~'ñ" ..- ~~~"-'::. l '. f ~I ~la" / -- -----~ ~~... \ I: .J"" - ..... ~. ee.. ,~ . ',-:: ·1- "-'."' -'~h , ": ,,_ \...;.1.1 : > --" , " /' · ..;,..-,' I: _..~ I .J. 'w!, I -" :.1> ' ~ _..-! .,. .. . I---~'" · 1 . , \ \ ., y~ .,- ___:..J....... ". r-: _ '. ,; , ". ~~~ ~ ,. (' \'" _--";:::--: -=-~i!.. ~~ · .;,_ _ '-=:~~I.I[CU I I ,~ I 1 '" QI.- - ';'"':7: ~r-~"'~1'-r'~ï'" - ':-'_.. ~- " . ~ = .-I~_~~. .'1, -~ : ~ _i . '" _', ~~ _ _ "-..:..~,"~';: - =- -:.:--1 ~.9kw-Drl v~ ~ _-:-- \Q~~-~.!~f:..~ >~:'~~~=f > =. ::. Balto. City \ - ~, ". .:.... '7~.;.;---,...;J-~ 3· 357 MISC. 1987 STREIT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS \?~~~ T JtTril~~~-,·'~{: ::::~~:::~:f::~T::::::·t:OS::::h S 150,000 (;-.- -L-1~~~___-=~-rl=J.!~:t'. Terr~I~~I~~·~::. Conece Circle to 218,000 " I ~ _e. ... ~'. --.~ '~~~~-.~';.",~ Circle Drive South 80,000 , _ -\ · I ~ '...1, .-a-' -- ~.-\ Crabtree Lane fro. Turner to the . . I · · - - . I rill i., tC' North Dead End 125,000 =: I I' - :'--:: · ~"''' rayte Lane fro. Turner to the North Dead Ind .~",~e Rlchland Plaza Drive fro. Billye ~~ raye to Broadvay v~· ~ .. .' ~ .c 110 .... = c o 6J C t! Bursey Road --- ~ :; I I I ~ u C i .... U ., ... 0.. I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie 135,000 198,000 Villowcrest Total Istlaated Cost . (Not Includlnl Utility Adjust.ents) S 906,000 CITY or NORTB RICBLAND BILLS, TEXAS I I Ie I ", 1 . I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I P~tlt STREET AND DRAINAGE IHPROVEMENT VILLOVCREST DRIVE From Broadway to Tourist 31' BIB, 2,050 L.V. 6" Curb, 24" Gutter 6" Thick HHAC 8" Lime Stab. Subgrade French Drain · Line "A", 6" PVC 570 , L.F. . Line "8", 6" PVC, 370 L.F. 6" V.L., PVC, 1,520 L.F. ,~ 2' ., ,.. , II 3·357 MISC. 1987 STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT: RICHLAND PLAZA DRIVE From Broadway to Billie Faye 45' BIB, 1,890 L.F. 6" Curb, 24" Gutter 6" Thick BHAC 8" Lime Stab. Subgrade 6" V.L., PVC, 1,640 L.F. 1 . 'D,Æ!/vE ~ , . /. 4/ ., \\~ /~ \ 'It V T.. 341\ .Sl -- ... ~ ~.:' ;.p' : ." r ~,"!'. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I mm D~. r n I.,~ ~.. ~ 1,,< k.J~ 3 A..(. ~ 4(., ., lQ 10"3 1. , 1 ~ A , 'T" ..0 ~ II lQ i ~ .~.~ - & "f ~ ....'. : 2", . II' f o~~ II A.. 'T À V& A. C'£( . I~,-- + i" I~ t.. &S "c.. 'Q '0 ¡T '2 ; 14- . ; , ~ (.5 2 : ~ ,'2 ;3+ J 4 ~ ;. 5 TQ tA . r. + :;, ~4";¡;: "TQ ?" :. -.,: -~:- ¿ .... i:.. N "". PT A. ~, -... 1 I / / ~"3 3·357 MISC. 1987 STREET AND DRAINAGE I- ,¡,,'\! cO( L £,~ TERRY DRIVE 1 ler I College Circle to College Circle S. 31' BIB, 1,000 L.F. 6" Curb, 24" Gutter 6" Thick HHAC 8" Lime Stab. Subgrade 6" V.L, PVC, 1,000 L.F. I··.., · . ... o ~ + 1'5 1..~~....J + #. e ... ..,; 1.9 ~ '...", . ~R 1~ :; .00 ~J _ @ ... . @) 1 1-- -- I I ~ , I ,I I I , I I I I I , ¡I' ~! .~...~....!~ . ..I ~ 'IN W~~~ ... \\øOc.. · . .~ , - '.. ~ ~\wfa , & þ d ""(..'t /Jt... $ o . c Q '6 N ~\c:."~""'b Q ~~\ ~.': ~,-"t> ~ :' "'- .,.. " ..~ ï A .A.p,J....' I Ie ".0 I I I I I I ,~ ~ 14 : ,.. n "'-'l ~ ~:=I ~i.. ~~.~~ "~i~" + Tlt~ Î'It¡~3e 01\ ~ " I' 10 I ' ' ,. I' . . I. " . " ,. I. ~..I """ ~.. " 2 , '2~ ~ ~~ : ~~... ~ , "!~. ~ I ' · ~.. 4- ,a'".9 :' ~ ~l5l _~ ,J&.' ~ II I ~~ ~ e ~ Q ~ ,e- ; -.21 '.01.4 . c.. ~ · A 1040 n.. ~'..lr I. "'" ~ ~ . '~t'" ' ~, 18Q . gll '20 ~ ; -c \IJ · ,,~ -. I!Þ 0 .J "'t.. ~ '. o ... ð &Q/ÂRt)AL.a '21 ~; : Ie. & It . _ C.~,I "".6 " «. __ ¡ '2'Z.1l (";"\" Q) .~ "ê '2 III.. , . -tJ" .. ~ '2~ 1 ~ I. .. I I' c:-r. r '~_ tf: ..~ 64- ,.. ~.. .. ~ ~ ISI ~~r' ..,.... ~. '''' ~ ~ "-12. ¿- ..... I ~ ~It .~:; ~. '. ", , , I~ : ÇF CT. I I . .. I . . 2,: '22' 5~ I I ., I j'f. ...,~. 'I ,l'· ~ ~: I ¡< ., .,. ~ 0 : ~ I . = ~ " I % ~' 14 . I S ~ '" II!: ~---;J..: 10' ,., ..,' 1 r ". '., ~'{ ,": ~ ~~~tL ~:: ~< Ið ~:: II ~ : ; 3 :: .(~~ ". ," .. ...-,.# ~. . ~ :z ;.,.~ 8 . ~ ~.... - : 8 ; a u tie ,..... ~,'., ..~ ~ 5 ;:~ ~ ,f ;,: ~ ,,~ S... ~ 0: ... 10'. ~. ~ c. ,~ I ~ p.'''~ ST. a . ~.. .I~r ~ """- OL'''O I~ .~'- ~ 5 _~ ~ ~I 3 : 1 ~ , , · I~ ; n ' ... ':J 0 .......... .'- \II. ~ ~ r!> : 'X ' ,.. . ~ ,. ~, ~ ~ 1~ ,~t)~ t: .v. . ''t.", ..,. ..... a; 'II .1"" 3.357 MISC. 1987 STREET AND DRAINAGE PAYTE LANE , . Turner to Hightower 31' BIB, 1,400 L.F. 6" Curb, 24" Gutter 6" Thick HMAC 8" Lime Stab. Subgrade 6" V.L, PVC, 1,400 L.F. :. 13 : ~ ~ : " ~-C/ W ïQ.~. "'.S Ac.. ~ .: ,. .. . .. : ~ .. ...... . - . A.c:.~ _.It.... ---W~ - TQ.~. '. ìQ.~ I ~c.. . Ta -¡A.1.. 43 Åc.. , . ~. , IV ,. I , '1 .: S,ARNEc:, ,." " ... ,: . ... ~ 'W\ iRA.C.T ~It 3·357 MISC. 1987 STREET AND DRAINAGE CRABTREE LANE Turner to Hightower 31' BIB, 1,400 L.F. 6" Curb, 24" Gutter 6" Thick HMAC 8" Lime Stab. Subgrade 6" V.L., PVC, 1,400 L.F. ; '5: It.. R i 1S I." .. ....6I-4TOWEQ i CR. .~t.t.. I~ '80.&" I "S),U', ... 1\. _ lCø : : , .. _ Ie. :; : I ~~~:,~ '2 ~(I~,' ~'''fl ".~ 14 ~ ~ ~ 3 : ~ .ot : "~ .. . ..~ ~:" : ~ ' .- . ~ LS¡ :-!II; .4 ........ 13"'1= ~;. . ~ 10 '2 .. ~ r3,,-- '.....~ rc. "' 5 ~ ~ ,~~ ,~ ; ~5 . 1.1.. 11. C·: - ':i . : I~. ' ~t. ' ~ II ~: .~.. : '10 ~ ... , ~ ~ 10 ~~(' -. -- ........ .. a . .,..~ ~ = .. ~ ' ~~ " '7 ~.." J ,. lit -~o 0 .. 'ðo ,. ~ .,'" ~,. WOtJ..'" ...l ~ \ 1 1rR, ''7Jow ~. ~~\ 40 . ,,\'íi.fJ. ... .~., - I~ I.. : ~ '" ... n : ~2 ; ~ ~ ~ ~ I;: ..' .... 1Q : "'3 Â.. i'. ð.'. ~...... tf.... ~/ n.~· ,Qt 5 I'l I~ ~ rt ... ~~~ I~.~: ~ ~ .. .~~.' is · ~J' ~~, ,f~ 1/_ ... II ,~ I. ,r'- .. ~_ '0 .'T,...." ,1II.t¡ ~ I!... 4 . m. If;" ":t. I 11.::1 ... ~ 5 t' __, ~ · .w It... 15' ;.... ~ S~; _!\ k., .. ' ... ï 4 ) ~ = (., .~ ~ é B ,~ ~ 14 II'; · 13 I _.f.. I La. ~ I 10 13" -- ::.. 12" ~\~O ~~ " &2." ~ · '0 I~~'Y:0 ~~A ... .......,.,. - ~ ... ,.. \. v, í. '~, I~ ... _ _ __ ~~ ,LJ.....-....~ ..... A., ... .-,;_tI',... D', - ~ .. ~ ..~. ~ "h II·" Î-¿; t ~ v-.J'.' ~ ,10. ~. 1. J ~~ ~ ~ 'I : g L. &. ~ .: ~ "u rf. 'A' ... 'l.... .. · .. ,.., -., ..! ~ '2.' .. .. : S,. .t ~ 3 ~ 8 ::- ~" ~ .,,~ .. 4!) I PO. !I: ~ ~ -, : \.. ., '~~ l\ I '" TA IÞ.'-' !'.' t::'\,. 4, : I I"L""'~ ~ ,~ 2.' .,.,~ ~ ~ c. :1 ,_ .. ~ s~ ~JJ Ih'f"~ ....t"t I 'I. '2 3 41 ~\o t- 6 , I ' ,,13. ,,) IS 2f I.. . ~.i:: · "' '9,>.: lJ JB~: ._~ ... IS I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 88-41 Date: September 26, 1988 Subject: Issues Raised in Citizen IS Presentation at Public Hearing on Proposed Budget At the September 12, 1988 Public Hearing on the Proposed 1988/89 Budget, a citizen's presentation was given which raised questions about the General Fund salary costs included in the proposed budget, and the effect of the tax rate as proposed on the owner of a hypothetical piece of property valued at $100,000. The City Council requested clarification of these matters. Salary Cost Analysis The citizenls presentation to the City Council on September 12th analyzed salary costs expressed in terms of average salaries. For your convenience, that information has been reproduced on the attached table in the section labeled Section A. The average salary information presented therein has also been expressed in terms of total personnel budget costs. The difference between the 1987/88 salary budget and the proposed 1988/89 budget is calculated to be $642,904, whereas the proposed budget for salaries as presented by the staff shows an increase for 1988/89 of $238,471 over 1987/88 (Section B), a difference of $404,433. The wide disparity between these two calculations is due to the fact that the citizen IS presentation differential ($642,904) is based on comparing the reestimated budget for 1987/88 with the 1988/89 proposed budget; whereas the real differential ($238,471) is based on comparing the adopted budget for 1987/88 with the proposal for 1988/89. The $404,433 difference between the two methods of analysis is caused by the significant retrenchment in salary expenditures that was implemented during the current fiscal year as required by revenue short-falls, as well as other factors. The best illustration of the fallacy of comparing reestimated expenditures in the current year with proposed expenditures for next year is provided in the Legal budget, in which the 1987/88 adopted budget provided $12,638 for the Paralegal who was budgeted for nine months on the payroll at 50% of her salary. Due to delays in remodeling to provide office space for the Attorney for the City and the Paralegal, her actual cost on the City Payroll for 1987/88 is projected at $4,213. Therefore, comparing estimated expenditures this year ($4,213) -with the proposed 1988/89 Budget ($15,483) would erroneously indicate a 368% increase. It is believed that the $238,471 differential in personnel cost for 1988/89 as shown is as accurate as possible, taking into consideration human limitations. ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 Analysis of Tax Costs The citizen's presentation purporting to show a dramatic increase in the tax bill on a hypothetical $100,000 parcel of property was flawed by including in the computations the amount of new value added to the tax roll each year by new construction. The attached table subtracts from the real property tax roll the new construction each year and shows that, compared to the base year of 1985/86 (taxable values as of January, 1, 1985) the total tax roll was increased by 16.2% in 1986/87, was reduced in 1987/88, and was further reduced in 1988/89 to the extent that the tax roll for next year on the real property that was on the tax roll in 1985/86 was only 1.1% higher than in 1985/86. Using the example of application of these numbers to a hypothetical $100,000 parcel of property, and taking into account increases in the tax rate, it can be seen that the tax bill for that piece of property, assuming its valuation was changed in proportion to the total tax roll change, would have increased by $109.65 over the four year period. It should be emphasized, as reflected in the attached table, that $97.47 of that increase is due to debt service on bonds which were approved by the voters by a 4/1 margin, and that the cost of maintenance and operations has increased only $12.18 over that four year period. * * * * If any additional information is desired it will be furnished upon request. Respectfully submitted, ~1l/~ Rodger N. Line City Manager RNL/gp CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Ie I I I I I I I en ... en ... Þ-- %8 Q :z:: ... ~ L&I ... :z:: Ie % % (.) 0 - u) a: a: L.U ~Q.. 0: LI- o 0 % en La- - o en I >- >- -J Þ-- < - % <.> < I I I I I I Ie I "" "" · . · 1 · u) . 1 u.I I · - U) I :3~! i~~~ :=U)~ · "" en x: · -CD<'> CD CD"""" en en CD Þ-- -0 lID ~-=~:~~ -O-UOOOI Þ-- ,IJ 0.. -0 CD <.> Þ-- 0 -J 0 ::J lID """ L&I u.I """ L. CD en ,?g~~Q.. - · ~o..o · CÐOu) · a: a: · U)o..""" · u..I a.. Ia::%. CD I <Þ--' lID 10..- I" uen ,:EX. u..- 10 I Q.OOI I U . 0-0- I I -0 ::J lID I I -C:CDen I I - "" "" "" "" "" I I I I I I I . t Þ- I u) I 0 t U t , -J , W t z t :z: , 0 en I U) -0 lID ,a::CDuen 'WcnCD- a.. &..go ~ ... 0 :::J lID < L. CD en -a.. - o Þ-- i3 Q -0 W CD lID U)4J_en -c: 10 10 - CD E ::J 1 1_ u_ t _ u CD t tn -c: en 'LU - "" en u.I « .~ < en eft CD ª= I:) . "" w ~ . U) - I o I a.. eft o a:: I:) Q..~ ~ffi - U) :Ie""" . a:: u) a.. %W O-CI) - a:: - Þ-- < u) U -' >- W -C:-J u) CI) -c: · :z: t lID < · CD · "" en I _. · CD:Z: I en u.I en I - _ W I -- I 0 Þ-- 0::: I LU--C: I - c..> ...) I -c: I -c: .:lClen I - I , Þ- · en 1 W I LU , ex:: .. -0 .. .. > en L. 1D &.~ ~ ~~~ Q.. (.) -o~ :: ~ ~ o '0 C Q. Cf) 10 o ~ L. 00 <.> a.. > < ~ ex: ~ ::E o U >- W-o t..en ~ IU 10 CD < en - en 0::: 0 10 - W O-u) . :> 0 CD -c: L. OOCD a.. > en < - :z: C> C LU -0 >- CD U) GJ t.. CD -c: _ 10 en CD 10-- e 10 I :;U):; en 0- en LoU >- -c: -0 en en GJ C CD en 0 en 0- 0- 4J I ~-;~ a..æ~ -0 en CD : ~.§; : =-;~ ........ ........,~æ~ II) U C ~ ~ ë; ---- - ~-~~_O-en_~-_~CD~~CD _en-_en~_~~IID~~en~~_~ en-lIDen__~__~...,~en__CD ~r-:~~.,;...:or:~..,;~..;~~~..:~ -- ~~-::::."" ::.~-::::.~~- ~O_""~~IIDCD_o_~___cnen ~~IID_~_en...,~ooo__~_o =~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~:;;~~==~==:;;:::;;~~=~ -- - -~--~-;:;:: ~enCDlIDcn""en___...,en___...,_ =~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ =~~;::~==::=~=~~~~: -- - -""_-~__o -- tD U C ~ :: Q ---- O--OO~__~___~~CDeno _en~-__~""_~_""en_~o_ enen_...,_en__o_o~_~~_ ~ ~ ...: ~ or: ..; .,; or: ò è v: ~ v: ...: .... Ò ---~-_-...,...,_~_~...,IID_ ---- ....- OO_""~""CDIID_o""~___enen ~OCDIID~CDen~...,ooo-_...,_o =~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --~~cn~oen~_~__~...,o ~~--_en_encn~~~____ -- ~ -""--~_CDO ~Ñ Oeft-""~eft~_cn~CDen_CDcnocn ~O~-""~~_~__~....cn~....CD =~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ---C---O~~O_loftllDcnen CD..., _~""CD~~___-...,~.... - - .... - - ..., - "- loft _ ~ eft .... - ~....................~ O--OO~__~___~~CDeno -cn--__~...,_~.......,en_~o_ encn-_CDcn__o_o~_~o_ ~ ø: ...: .,; or: .: .,; .; ò ò .õ ~ .õ ...: ~ CJI" ---~::::.:::::.::::.""""_Ioft....Ioft...,:::: o_ocn_en""_~""eft___...,...._ -~--...,cn~cnoloften~-_oloft~ ~...,Ioft-O~~""_O_O-___ . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .ø""""...,~_.ø___-...,...,...,...,_ u CD C 0- Il) C U 10 L. ~ GJ U a.. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ o=~:en=~~~=~~~=~=_ , . O~c)_O~_~~___~CDcn...,_ _~CD_OO-~""~~~""~o~.... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1ID~_CD~cnllD~cn__~...,~_~ ~- ...,...,----...,----...,..., ~...,O~IID__cn-_~o_~~-_ ....o~-~o__...,-~o_-oo~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -~_"'CD~"'__~...,...,O...,_..., ~- ...,-...,...,-------...,..., 00000000000000000 ooooo_oO~~O~OO~IIDO ooo~__...,~__o_o~__o ~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~ ..-..- C"I.... CICÞ \I') OOO~OOOOOOOOOOOOO oOo_o_OO~~OClOOO"'~O ooo-o_...,,,,__o...,,,,,,,~....o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - - rv.-- CX) Ln ¿.Þ C GJ j :3 U ~ en c: en en~~ ~ ~ ~~~ 5. t] >g-::;u2 ~ c.. ,.- _ c.. CD oa ~ CD c: ::J > ~ en>-OCD 'Vent.. CÞ c..> 0 ¿.Þ oX U uo_ cc..~ c c- ~ CIJ 00:: GJUCUIV- e3: e 'r- e Do..,- > c: G) e CÞ-c: c.. 0 U C'lO OOU =- 10 L.- '" U 10 C 10- e c..--.x_ CD cO C c: eJ:J >.0 c.._ c.. 00 U 00;::' 0- C =- 10 0..- ::£w:C::ICU-JUJo..a..a..u.. ~ ID c.. IV U g~~ "E ::J C U CÞ o 00 CÞ en CD U:Ec.n U »>r;;:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ uuu......<.>u.. - - CD ..., - ~ .... - ~ CD CD - crt ..., o G:) - - - C) cn .... - ~ ~ .... C) CD ~ loft cn cn ~ - - o en - - ~ II I :: II .. II II o .... en en ~ .... ~ I"- .... ..., ~ .... tD ..s ""0 ~ en ~ B :; C GJ 0- X G) -0 ~ ~ ¿.Þ en GJ I ~ CD CD ª CD ''¡; C ~ ~ ~~ CD ....... j~ ~.2 '"C '"C -! ~ Do. ~ ~ :: u ~ § 0. 0 ~ ~ .. .. I Ie I I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TAX INCREASE ANALYSIS - NRH BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 1985/1986 1986/1987 1981/1988 1988/1989 (1985 Tax Year) (1986 Tax Year) (1987 Tax Year) (1988 Tax Year) .........----...................... ---..-..........-----... .........----.......---... .......................--....- Taxable Value (Real Property Only) $1,057,535,329 * $1,346,090,923 $1,379,843,282 ' $1,311,092,258 Less: Value of Property not taxed in FY 1986 - Cumulative (New Construction) (117,277,883) (195,493,113) (241,878,776) .............--...........----... -----~..~.....__..-- ......................----.... $1,228,813,040 $1,184,350,169 $1,069,213,482 Percentage Change 16.2% 12.0% 1 .1% EXAMPLE (See Note): ....~-~----_.._.._----- Taxable Valuation $100,000 $116,196 $111,992 $101,104 Actual NRH Tax Rate 0.3350 0.3350 0.4130 0.4398 ..............----...--- ---------------.. --......-............--- ...............--...----.... Tax 8il1 $335.00 $389.25 $462.52 $444.65 Maintenance & Operations $197.00 $195.67 $219.95 $209.18 Debt Service 138.00 193.58 242.57 235.47 ---..----------- ---...-..----------... -------...-..------ ...------------..----- Tax Levy $335.00 $389.25 $462.52 $444.65 Cumulative M & 0 change ($1.33) $22.95 $12.18 Cumulative I & S change $55.58 $104.57 $97.47 ~~~----...-------- ....-...----........-....-... ----.....--------- Total cumulative change $54.25 $127.52 $109.65 * Fiscal year 1985/86 represents the base year (January 1, 1985 values). NOTE: This assumes that a $100,000 parcel of real property was increased in valuation by TAD in 1986/87 by the same percentage as the total tax roll was increased, and was reduced in 1987/88 and in 1988/89 by the same percentage as the total tax roll was reduced. I .i Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order September 12, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Mayor Richard Davis Mayor Pro Tem Mack Garvin Councilman Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman Virginia Moody Councilwoman Byron Sibbet Councilman Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Richard Albin City Manager Senior Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer Absent: Lyle E. Welch Linda Spurlock Counc i lman Councilwoman 3. INVOCATION Mayor Pro Tern Davis gave the invocation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 22, 1988 APPROVED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the Minutes of the August 22, 1988 meeting. Motion carried 5-0. 5. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Pro Tern Davis removed Item No. 25 from the Consent Agenda. II Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 2 6. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29 & 30) APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to move Item No. 17 to this point in the agenda. Motion carried 5-0. 17. GN 88-72 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF "CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TAX AND GOLF COURSE REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1988" - ORDINANCE NO. 1565 APPROVED Mr. Line stated that First Southwest Company and the City's legal advisor have recommended to accept the bid of Clayton-Brown & Associates. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No. 1565 and the bid of Clayton-Brown & Associates, Inc. for the purchase of 4.23 million dollars City of North Richland Hills, Texas Tax and Golf Course Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1988 dated September 1, 1988 with the net effective interest rate of 7.489762 percent. Motion carried 5-0. 7. PZ 88-7 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF JULIO AND EUMELIA E. NEIRA TO REZONE THE NORTH 150 FEET OF BLOCK 3, AUTREY ADDITION FROM R-3 TO C-2 (LOCATED AT 6650 GLENVIEW DRIVE - SOUTH SIDE OF GLENVIEW DRIVE AT THE CORNER OF GLENVIEW AND RITA BETH STREET) (POSTPONED FROM AUGUST 8TH, 1988) Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Pedro Rodriguez, 5560 Glenview, representing Julio Neira, appeared before the Council. Mr. Rodriguez stated they wanted to build a restaurant on the property. il Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 3 Councilwoman Moody stated that at the Planning and Zoning Meeting there was concern about the traffic on Rita Beth and the parking problems. Councilwoman Moody stated that if the restaurant was not built, she was concerned about the other businesses that could go under the C-2 zoning. Councilwoman Moody asked if they would agree to a Planned Development restriction with no ingress or egress onto Rita Beth. Mr. Rodriguez stated they would. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked if they were going to use the existing house or would they build another building. Mr. Rodriguez stated they would use the existing house, but they would be putting brick around it. Councilman Garvin asked if the restaurant would have facilities for sit down or would it be a carry out restaurant. Mr. Rodriguez stated it would be both. Councilman Garvin asked where they planned for the cars to park and how they would enter and exit the parking lot. Mr. Rodriguez stated there was plenty of room for parking in the area at the back of the house and that they would access the parking lot from the other side of the house. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. 8. ORDINANCE NO. 1557 TABLED Councilman Garvin stated because the only access to the parking facilities would be through someone else's property and because of the location and size of the lot, he recommended that the request be denied. Mr. Rodriguez stated they would be parking in front and behind the house. Mr. Rodriguez stated it would be a small restaurant. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked if the Staff had looked at a proposed site plan layout. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he would like for the ordinance to be postponed until a site plan could be submitted showing the parking and landscaping. Mr. Horvath stated he was concerned about the expense involved in upgrading the building from residential to commercial. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 4 Councilwoman Moody stated she felt it should be tabled until a site plan could be submitted and for the applicant to get with the City Staff concerning what would be involved to bring the building up to City Code. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to table Ordinance No. 1557 and that the applicant bring in a site plan showing how they are going to refurbish the building, parking, landscaping, entrances, etc., and with the recommendation that there be no entrances off of Rita Beth, screening walls as required by City Code and bring it back to the Council in one month. Motion carried 5-0. 9. PZ 88-11 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF E-SYSTEMS POOL TRUST TO REZONE TRACTS 4B, 4A1, 4A4, 4A5A, 4A58 AND 4A5C, J. H. BARLOUGH SURVEY, ABSTRACT 130 FROM R-3 TO C-1 (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LEWIS LANE AT DAVIS BOULEVARD) Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing for PZ 88-11, PZ 88-12 and PZ 88-13 and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Mr. David Washington, Washington & Associates Engineers, 500 Grapevine Highway, Hurst, representing E-Systems Pool Trust, appeared before the Council. Mr. Washington stated that PZ 88-11 was for commercial zoning. Mr. Washington stated the property was bounded on the east by Lewis Lane, was immediately south of the future extension of Watauga Road, bounded on the north and east by existing commercial and on the west across Lewis Lane by existing commercial. Mr. Washington stated that approval of this request would allow the planning of the entire property and would assist in solving what could be a major traffic problem at the intersection of Davis, Watauga and Lewis Lane by allowing the closing of Lewis Lane. Mr. Washington stated that PZ 88-12 was located immediately south of the Sunny Meadows Addition. Mr. Washington stated this proposed zoning was a transitional zoning from the existing Holiday East Mobile Home Park located to the south to the R-3 buffer to the north. Mr. Washington stated it was a stepping zoning from the mobile home park to R-7 to R-8 to R-3 in the existing development. Mr. Washington stated the property was bounded on the east by proposed industrial zoning and on the west by existing R-7 zoning. Mr. Washington stated that PZ 88-13 concerned the proposed industriðl zoning east of Sunny Meadows Addition. Mr. Washington stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended, and the owners concurred, that the area to the north of the proposed Watauga Road be zoned C-1, there be a 200 foot wide strip adjacent to the existing residential zoning of 0-1 and that the remainder of the property be granted for industrial. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 5 Councilwoman Moody asked if E-Systems had met and obtained input from any of the homeowner organizations. Mr. Washington stated they talked to the homeowners on an individual basis and met just prior to the Planning and Zoning Meeting. Councilwoman Moody asked if they had any buyers for the property or was this speculative zoning. Mr. Washington stated the purpose at this time was to obtain the zoning so that E-SY$tems could plan the land and the area. Mr. Washington stated there were no immediate prospective users. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked how wide the proposed Amundson Drive right-af-way would be. Mr. Washington stated that the proposed right-of-way was sixty-eight feet. Mr. Washington stated one of the options discussed at the Planning and Zoning meeting was that Amundson would line up as it exists on the north where it would come down immediately next to Sunny Meadows Addition. Mr. Washington stated they had proposed that Amundson be moved over 25 feet and that would be an additional 25 feet of buffer or greenbelt area that would be dedicated to the City in addition to the 68 foot right-of-way. Mr. Washington stated there was an option that Amundson could be moved any place within that 200 feet. Mr. Washington stated that this could be discussed when the property was platted. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked Mr. Washington if he would be opposed to the approval of the proposed 1-2 zoning with the stipulation that the area north of the proposed Watauga Road be C-1 and that a 200 foot strip be zoned 0-1 and consideration be given to a buffer zone contingent upon Amundson location. Mr. Washington stated they could accept that. Councilman Metts asked if they were proposing a 25 foot green belt and then 200 foot 0-1 zoning. Mr. Washington stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended accepting a total of 200 foot strip of 0-1 zoning. Mr. Washington stated the location of Amundson was discussed, the 25 foot greenbelt was discussed and they were still in agreement to giving the 25 foot greenbelt assuming that Amundson fell adjacent to the property. Mr. Dan Echols, 5016 Nevada Trail, appeared before the Council. Mr. Echols stated the development of this portion of the City was vital to the City·s development. Mr. Echols stated that E-Systems had made every effort to construct the buffering necessary for the welfare of Sunny Meadows residents. Mr. Echols stated he was in sympathy with the Sunny Meadows residents, but that he fully believed that all of the problems had been solved and that all three of the requests were reasonable. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 6 Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. Mr. Noah Campbell, 9200 Martin Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Campbell stated that at the Planning and Zoning Meeting there was a statement made that there would be 1200 square feet homes. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that in R-8 zoning the minimum square footage for a house was 1,200 square feet. Mr. Campbell stated he felt it should be at least 1,600 square foot houses. Ms. Kathy Robinson, 6463 Chilton, appeared before the Council. Ms. Robinson expressed her opposition to these zoning requests. Ms. Robinson asked that the zoning be denied until E-Systems contacted all of the citizens and let the citizens jointly settle the problems in the area. Councilman Garvin asked what problems she felt should be addressed by Mr. Washington. Ms. Robinson stated one problem was the proposed offices. Councilman Garvin stated it was to provide a buffer to the people in Sunny -Meadows Addition. Councilwoman Moody stated that E-Systems was not a developer, that this was speculative zoning. Mr. Charles Scoma, 8300 Cardinal Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Scoma stated he was speaking against the multi-family zoning. Mr. Scoma stated he did not feel it was practical to approve the zoning on the basis of a transition at this point. Mr. Scoma stated he felt the request for commercial zoning on Davis Boulevard was a practical consideration for zoning. Mr. Scoma stated that in regard to the industrial zoning, his opinion was that the property on Grapevine Highway should be sold and developed before rushing into an industrial zoning on this piece of property on a speculative basis. Mr. Scoma stated the proposed routing of Watauga Road thorough this property that was put together by pieces and parcels to make a major holding investment is primarily for the purpose of making a profit for E-Systems. Mr. Scoma stated he did not want to deny them making a profit but did want to deny the right of impacting negatively upon the residents of the City. Mr. Scoma stated he felt there was a great deal of reluctance from E-Systems for the granting of rights-of-way for Watauga Road, his position was to petition the State to go back to the original routing of Watauga Road, and let E-Systems develop the property they own with their own roads, right-of-way and that the City of North Richland Hills not have to be concerned about the acquisition of right-of-way and proceed with the east west route that all recognize the need for. Mr. Scoma stated another alternative was to look at the proposed Cannon Drive and consider the property north of Cannon Drive to be residential rather than industrial zoning. Mr. Scoma requested that I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 7 the City Staff look at the possibility of relocating the proposed Simmons Road to the west to where it would tie into the existing Cardinal Lane that turned and went north and south. Mr. Scoma presented a sketch to the Council. Mr. Scoma further recommended that the area between Amundson and Simmons Drive be considered for residential zoning so that it tied to the other residential zoning and anything south of Cannon Drive be industrial. Mr. Scoma asked the Council to reject the request until a specific use plan could be developed and presented. Councilman Garvin stated the industrial proposal had been compromised with good buffering. Councilwoman Moody asked how many times representatives from E-Systems meet with him and his group. Mr. Scoma stated if Mr. Washington met with residents, he met with residents that have not spoken to him and that he did not meet with him. Councilman Garvin stated one of Mr. Scoma IS proposals was to take the thoroughfare down Martin Drive. Councilman Garvin stated he felt there would be residents on that street who would not be happy with that proposal. Mr. Scoma stated the residents on Martin Drive had anticipated the road being routed that way until it was changed on the Master Plan in 1986. Mr. Roy Owen, 8245 Pearl Street, appeared before the Council. Mr. Owen stated he was against the proposed zonings. Mr. Owen stated E-Systems was just a speculator. Mr. Owen stated the land would not be developed for several years. Mr. Owen stated he would like to see E-Systems sell the property on the contingency of submitting for approval what would be developed. Mr. Owen stated he felt it would be wrong to change any zoning until E-Systems could bring before the Council someone who was interested in developing the property. Councilman Metts stated he had observed both sides and that there was a disparity of opinions concerning E-Systems and the citizens wanting to get together. Councilman Metts asked if E-Systems would be willing to meet with the citizens. Mr. Washington stated they had attempted to set up a meeting prior to the Planning and Zoning Meeting and did meet with a few individuals at that time. Mr. Washington stated they would like to see the issue resolved as soon as possible. Mr. Washington stated they talked to the individuals who lived immediately next door to the site, tried to give those individuals proper buffering and feel like they have done that. Councilman Metts stated some felt they had not had an opportunity to meet with E-Systems. Councilman Metts stated he was not comfortable with changing the zoning without knowing what was going to be developed. Ms. Campbell, realtor, appeared before the Council. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 8 Ms. Campbell stated she was concerned about the value of the homes in the Stoneybrook area if 1,200 square foot homes were allowed to be built. Councilwoman Moody stated if the City were to eliminate all 1,200 square foot homes, the first-time home buyers would be eliminated from the City. Ms. Hocevar, 6251 Shirley Drive, appeared before the Council. Ms. Hocevar stated she would not have bought three years ago if she had thought there would be zero lot line houses across the street from her. Ms. Hocevar stated she felt E-Systems was not interested in developing land but in making a profit and they did not care who got hurt. Councilman Garvin stated the proposed R-8 zoning did not back up to Ms. Hocevar; that there was another street between her and the R-8 zoning. Councilman Sibbet stated he did not like zero lot line homes or apartments, but there were times when you had to make a decision. Councilman Sibbet stated he had empathy for Ms. Campbell; that his home was located next to apartments, the same as was proposed for her area. Mr. James Kohler, 6308 Shirley Drive, appeared before the Council. Mr. Kohler stated there was a half-hearted meeting in the lobby at the Planning and Zoning meeting; however there was no concurrence, agreements or settlements made as to what should be on the tract of land to be rezoned. Mr. Kohler stated he felt the request should be tabled until something definitely could be agreed upon by E-Systems, him and the owners of the land adjoining the property to be rezoned. Mr. Koler stated he would like to request that it be in writing what was going to be developed when, where and how. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearings RECESS Mayor Brown called a ten minute recess. BACK TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting back to order with the same members present. RECESS Councilman Garvin and Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked for a fifteen minute recess to talk with Mr. Scoma. BACK TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting back to order with the same members present. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 9 10. ORDINANCE NO. 1562 APPROVED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, that a moratorium be put on all spec-zoning until an ordinance was in effect that placed a time-frame on the zoning as to when it was developed before it reverted back to the original zoning. Motion failed 3-2; Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilmen Garvin, and Metts voting against and Councilwoman Moody and Councilman Sibbet voting for. Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve Ordinance No. 1562. Motion carried 5-0. 11. PZ 88-12 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF E-SYSTEMS POOL TRUST TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 8, J.H. BARLOUGH SURVEY, ABSTRACT 130, FROM R-3 TO R-8 (LOCATED EAST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF THE SUNNY MEADOWS ADDITION) Public Hearing was heard with Item No.9. 12. ORDINANCE NO. 1563 APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve Ordinance No. 1563 with the stipulation of 1,400 square foot houses. Councilwoman Moody stated that E-Systems had previously requested a R-7 buffer between the Mobile Home Park and R-3 and now they were asking for R-8 as a buffer between R-7 and R-3 zoning. Motion carried 4-1; Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilmen Garvin, Metts, and Sibbet voting for and Councilwoman Moody voting against. 13. PZ 88-13 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF E-SYSTEMS POOL TRUST TO REZONE TRACT 11, T.K. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1055, AND TRACT 2A, L.C. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1652, FROM R-3 TO I-I (LOCATED ON CARDINAL LANE AND EAST OF SUNNY MEADOWS ADDITION) Public Hearing was heard with Item No.9. 14. ORDINANCE NO. 1564 APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 10 Councilwoman Moody moved to deny Ordinance No. 1564. Motion to deny died for lack of a second. Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve Ordinance No. 1564 with the stipulation that Amundson Road have a 50 foot buffer to the west which would be between a road and residential property and the zoning east of Amundson Road be 125 feet of 0-1, professional type office space. Motion carried 3-2; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilmen Garvin and Metts voting for and Councilwoman Moody and Councilman Sibbet voting against. 15. GN 88-70 PUBLIC HEARING - OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988/89 Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. Mr. Maness, Finance Director for the City, appeared before the Council. Mr. Maness briefly outlined the proposed Operating Budget for fiscal year 1988/89. Ms. Jean Sallee, Director of the Tarrant Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse, Northeast Area, appeared before the Council. Ms. Sallee urged the Council to reconsider the proposed $1,000 cut in support of the Tarrant Council. Mr. Charles Scoma, 8300 Cardinal Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Scoma presented an overhead slide, of his analysis of the tax increase, to the Council. Mr. Scoma stated he felt there were some areas in the budget that needed to be looked at for consideration. Mr. Scoma stated salaries was the greatest expense factor. Mr. Scoma presented an analysis of the increase in personnel salaries including benefits broken down by departments. Mr. Scoma recommended to the Council that they consider how they could achieve some savings in the area of the five percent performance increase. Mr. Scoma stated there was a projection of approximately a 40 person turnover in the City for 1988/89 and there could perhaps be savings in the consolidation of job tasks as people leave. Mr. Scoma stated that eventually the CIP Funds would be depleted and he felt the City should begin thinking of how the City could generate revenues so that it could operate off of revenues rather than borrowed money. ' Councilman Garvin stated that salaries might be a cost factor but the function of the City was to provide services and if salaries were cut, services would be cut. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 11 Mayor Pro Tern Davis thanked Mr. Scoma for his time and the effort spent. Mr. Dan Echols, 5016 Nevada, appeared before the Council. Mr. Echols congratulated the Staff and Council on putting together what he felt like was a very good budget. Councilman Garvin recommended that the Staff be requested to transfer funds from the City Council 's Budget to the Fire Department Budget to cover the salary for one Firefighter. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated he wanted it on record that if a fireman should leave, the position would not be filled. Councilwoman Moody stated the Council was not authorizing another position, only trying to keep from laying someone off. Council supported the recommendation. Councilman Welch, being absent, had submitted a letter in support. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to set the date for the adoption of the 1988/89 Budget for September 26, 1988. Motion carried 5-0. *16. GN 88-71 REVISED AUDITORIUM POLICY APPROVED *18. GN 88-73 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A "PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR AGREEMENT" - RESOLUTION NO. 88-32 APPROVED *19. GN 88-74 CONTRACT FOR LABORATORY SERVICES WITH THE TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY APPROVED *20. GN 88-75 OPERATION SUPPORT FOR CIP PROJECT AND IMPACT ACCOUNTING SYSTEM APPROVED *21. GN 88-76 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH RICHARD PHELPS AS GOLF COURSE ARCHITECT APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 12 *22. GN 88-77 ENDORSEMENT OF THE TEXAS GOOD ROADS AMENDMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 88-31 APPROVED *23. GN 88-78 APPROVE RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE NEED FOR A ROADWAY ACROSS NORTHEAST TARRANT COUNTY - RESOLUTION NO. 88-34 APPROVED *24. PU 88-49 APPROVE PURCHASE OF LAND FROM GEORGE P. MACATEE III, ET AL FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING CALLOWAY BRANCH CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II APPROVED 25. PU 88-50 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR ACQUISITION OF LAND FROM RICHMOND BAY DEVELOPMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 88-33 POSTPONED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to postpone Resolution No. 88-33. Motion carried 5-0. *26. PW 88-30 APPROVAL OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 APPROVED *27. PW 88-31 APPROVAL OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 APPROVED *28. PW 88-32 APPROVE PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALK ON STARNES ROAD APPROVED *29. PW 88-33 APPROVAL OF EMERALD HILLS WAY WATER LINE RECONSTRUCTION AS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO MARTIN DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 12, 1988 Page 13 *30. PAY 88-4 APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT TO T.W. GILMORE CONSTRUCTION AND CALVIN BAKER CONSTRUCTION, JOINT VENTURE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,344.75 AND AUTHORIZE TRANSFER OF FUNDS APRPOVED 31. CITIZENS PRESENTATIONS MS. KARON CONTIZANO RE: TRAFFIC CITATION Ms. Karon Contizano was not present at the meeting. 32. ADJOURNMENT Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: &Ubject: I I I I I I I Administration C "I M " D 9/26/88 - ouncl eetlng ate: GN 88-82 Agenda Number: Appointments to Board of Adjustment Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Board of Adjustment as follows: COUNCIL PLACE NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM 2 4 6 Jim Kemp Jeff Bunting Harold Schubert September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Board of Adjustments. e Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget ., Ot r Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡t( 1fA?~ City Manager . Fmance Director I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I I. Department: I I I I I I I e CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Administration 9/26/88 Council Meeting Date: GN 88-83 Agenda Number: Subject: Appointments to Board of Appeals Consistent with the City Council policy reºar~~ ~ appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to che Board of Appeals as follows: COUNCIL PLACE NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM 2 4 6 7 Joe Crane Mary Norwood Robert Skinner Eric Hill (as alternate) September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1989 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Board of Appeals. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available e gfhe;~ting Budget - 7J ~ a~pv~ !-<-1_~~ ;t- Department Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of. r <- ""","", I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: .Ubject: I I I I Administration 9/26/88 - Council Meeting Date: GN 88-84 Agenda Number: Appointments to Cable TV Board Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Cable TV Board as follows: COUNCIL PLACE NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM 2 4 6 George Angle Ray Fulenwider Pat Carruth September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Cable TV Board. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Department Head Signature !21f/[/~ City Manager . Fmance Director ~ h~<.:J I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: esubject: I I I I Administration . . 9/26/88 Council Meeting Date: Appointments to Capital Improvement Advisory CommitteeA d N b GN 88-85 gen a urn er: Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee as follows: COUNCIL PLACE NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM 2 4 Mayor David Barfield David Green Patricia Marin (alternate) September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council mak~ appointments to the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee. I e Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available _ gi~;~ting Budget _ ~ I 9~~ Æ:::J klJ1. . ~~ 1 - Department Head Signature City' . -:ger I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: .ubject: I I Administration _ Council Meeting Date: 9/26/88 Agenda Number: GN 88-86 Appointments to Civil Service Commission Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Civil Service Commission as follows: COUNCIL PLACE NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM 2 4 6 7 Bernard R. Roux (as alternate) George Pederson Steve Hall (as alternate) Bob Roark October, 1989 October, 1989 October, 1989 October, 1989 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Civil Service Commission. I I ~ ~e I I ~ , I " Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget .Other I ~lLä:J ~1/1/-~ T - Depart':;'ent Head Signature I City Manager I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I Ie I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration 9/26/88 Council Meeting Date: GN 88-87 Agenda Number: Subject: Appointments to Library Board Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Library Board as follows: COUNCIL PLACE 2 4 6 Mayor NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM Jan Daniels Roxie Hamilton Kay Schmidt Alisa Wood (as alternate) September, 1990 September" 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Library Board. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable ;< IV~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Fmance Director Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I Ie CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration 9/26/88 Council Meeting Date: GN 88-88 Agenda Number: Subject: Appointments to Parks and Recreation Board Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Parks and Recreation Board as follows: COUNCIL PLACE NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM - 2 Wade Parkey September, 1990 4 Don Tipps September, 1990 6 Douglass Davis September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Parks and Recreation Board. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget eOt Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available r¿1/{?~ I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Subject: Appointments to Beautification Committee C ·1 M . D 9/26/88 _ ouncl eetlng ate: GN 88-89 Agenda Number: Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Beautification Committee as follows: COUNCIL PLACE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM Katheryne Robinson Juanita Kemp Robert Powers Janice Davis Alice Scoma Arfan Jabri Pat Fisher September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Beautification Committee. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget O~~~7W ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable I< Ifj~~ City Manager . Fmance Director Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I Ie CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration . 9/26/88 Council Meeting Date: GN 88-90 Agenda Number: ubject: Appointments to Planning and Zoning Commission Consistent with the City Council policy regarding appointments to boards and commissions, nominations have been made to the Planning and Zoning Commission as follows: COUNCIL PLACE 2 4 Mayor NOMINEE EXPIRATION OF TERM David Barfield David Green Patricia Marin (as alternate) September, 1990 September, 1990 September, 1990 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council make appointments to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available /-Øt/~ City Manager t Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 II CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance Council Meeting Date:9/26/88 GN 88-91 Agenda Number: Certified Tax Roll - Resolution No. 88-30 The "Truth-in-Taxation" section of Chapter 26 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires that the Chief Appraiser of the taxing district supply each taxing unit within that county with certified totals of all appraised values within that taxing unit. lk. William Roberts, Chief Appraiser of Tarrant Appraisal District, has suhnitted totals of appraised values to the City of North Richland Hills for our approval. The net taxable value is $1,414,351,912. Also, in accordanCe Section 26.01 of the State Property Tax Code, the Chief Appraiser is directed to prepare a list of all properties pending disposition before the Appraisal Review Board. These values are not included in the net taxable values. However, in cœ1puting the effective tax rate the value of those properties {$32,399,392} must be added to the net taxable value as stated aOOve. Those values will be included on a subsequent tax roll after final disposition by ARB. In consideration of the fact that the final disposition of sane of the appeals will not be detennined until Mid-December and historically the ARB frequently grants request for valuation reductions, the proposed budget has been prepared assuming a loss of $15,000,000 in appeals. Reconmendation: It is recœmended that the City accept the net taxable value including the protested values in the amount of $1,446,751,304. Finance Review ~- ..t '" N/A Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ Finance Director .J Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of 1 I I. I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -. I I RESOLUTION NO. 88-30 WHEREAS, the City Council of this City received the Ad Valorem Tax Rolls for the year 1988 from Tarrant Appraisal District in the amount of net taxable value of $1,414,351,912 plus value of properties pending disposition before the Appraisal Review Board; and WHEREAS, the City Council studied said Tax Rolls and approved same on September 26, 1988. N<M , THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The approval of said Tax Rolls received fran Tarrant Appraisal District in September, 1988, be and is hereby ratified and said Tax Rolls shall collectively be considered the Tax Roll of this City for 1988 and it is hereby in all things adopted and approved. Passed and approved the 26th day of September, 1988. Tœmy Brown - Mayor ATrEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS 'ID FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Counci I Meeting Date: 9/26/88 Granting of Exemptions FY 1988-89 - ·Resolution - 88-37 GN 88- 92 Agenda Number: I I The attached Resolution grants exemptions to those citizens of North Richland Hills that qualify for hanestead, over/65, or disabled citizens as specified in the State Property Tax Cooe. The anounts of the exemptions are the same fran previous years surrmarized as follows: 1. General Hanestead 15% minimum of $5,000 2. OVer/65 equals $25,000 3. Disabled Citizens equals $25,000 ReccrrlnYaIldation: Approve Resolution 88-37. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ¿ /11~. -. Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable ~~7~ ~ N/A , Finance Director City Manager Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I -I I I I I Ie I I RESOLUTION NO. 88-37 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. There shall be exempt from the Ci ty Ad Valorem Taxes for the year 1988, fifteen per cent (15%) (with a minimum of $5,000) of the assessed value of residential haœstead wi thin the Ci ty which is occupied by the owner as his haœstead. 2. Persons over the age of 65 years, claiming an exemption pursuant to Ordinance No. 676 shall have a $25,000.00 exemption fran the assessed value of a residential haœstead. A person who is disabled within the neaning of Section 11.13 (m) of the Property Tax Code of the State of Texas, as of January 1st of each year shall be entitled to $25,000.00 exemption fran the assessed value of property owned by such disabled persons and used exclusively for haœstead purposes by such disabled persons. No person may claim 1x>th the "over 65" exemption and the "disability" exemption and no haœstead shall be subjected to 1x>th the "over 65" exemption and the "disability" exemption. 3. Persons claiming the exemptions must cat1pl y wi th the Ci ty Ordinances and Texas Property Tax Ccx1e. PASSED AND APPROVED this 26th day of September, 1988. Tœmy Brown - Mayor A'ITEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FinaÌlce Council Meeting Date:9/26/88 Agenda Number:GN 88-93 S~tti~g Tax- Rate for Fiscal Year 1988-89 Ordinance No. 1567 The attached Ordinance sets the Tax Rate at 43.98¢ per $100 valuation for budget year 1988-89. Recorrmendation: Approve Ordinance No. 1567. Department Head Signature Finance Review Acct. Number N/A SuffiCien~s ~ -;é:::::á ~ R 1Ir/~~' City Manager . Finance Director Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other /::) ~ /J?"'-......~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I· Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I ORDINANCE NO. 1567 AN ORDINANCE LEVYING A TAX RATE FOR THE CITY OF NORm RICHIAND HILlS, TEXAS FOR THE 1988 TAX YEAR BE IT ORDAINED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHIAND HILlS THAT: We, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills do hereby levy or adopt the tax rate on $100 valuation for this City for tax year 1988 as follows: $ .2069 for the purposes of naintenance and operation. $ .2329 for the paynent of principal and interest on debt of this City. $ .4398 total tax rate. The tax assessor-collector is hereby authorized to assess and collect the taxes of the City of North Richland Hills on this 26th day of September, 1988. 1. That there is hereby levied and shall be collected as provided by law, an Ad Valorem tax for the year 1988 on all property, real and personal, except such property as may be exempt fran taxation by Constitution and the statutes of the State of Texas, and ordinances and resolutions of the City of North Richland Hills, situated within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, on January 1, 1988, and that the aIIDunt to be applied to the value of such property shall be 43.98¢ per $100.00 valuation. 2. That the tax so levied and assessed shall be apFOrtioned to the accounts and funds in the aIOOunt as set forth aOOve. The arrounts collected for paynent of principal and interest on debt of the Ci ty shall be deFOsi ted into an interest and sinking fund for that purpose until a total of $3,269,280 is deFOsited fran the 1988 Ad Valorem tax levy. A three percent (3%) uncollectible factor is imputed. 3. That the taxes provided for herein are in accordance wi th the appropriate State statues. 4. Ad Valorem taxes levied by this Ordinance shall' be due and payable on October 1, 1988, and shall becane delinquent on the first day of February, 1989. paynent of such tax is due in one full installrænt. 5. If the tax is unpaid after February 1, 1989, such tax will becœe delinquent and penal ty and interest will attach and accrue as provided by the Statures of the Texas Property Tax Ccxìe Sec. 33.01. I· Ie 1 I 1 I I I 1 t' 1 1 I I 1 I Ie I 1 ORDINANCE NO. Page Two 6. In the event the taxes œcane delinquent and in the event such delinquent taxes are referred to an attorney for collection, an addi tional amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the total aIrount of tax, penalty and interest then due shall be added as collection costs to be paid by the taxpayer. 7. Taxes herein levied and uncollected shall be a first prior and superior lien against the property, and the said lien shall be superior liens charges, and encumbrances, and such lien shall attach to personal property wi th the same priori ty as to real property. 8. The lien provided herein shall be attached as of January 1, 1988. 9. Should any section, provision or clause of the Ordinance be declared by a court of canpetent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validi ty of the Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so declared to be invalid. 10. The Ordinance shall becane effective fran and after the date of its approval and adoption as provided by law. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, u:pon first and final reading, at a regular meeting on the 26th day of September, 1988. Tarmy Brown - Mayor A'ITEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPI\üVED AS rro FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance Adopting Budget FY 1988-89 - Ordinance No. 1569 Budget adoption is the final step in the budget process. 9/26/88 Council Meeting Date: GN 88-94 Agenda Number: 'n1e attached Ordinance No. 1569 surrmarizes estimated revenues and proposed expendi tures for the various operating funds as presented to Ci ty Council at the August 20, 1988 Workshop as \VeIl as the Budget as amended per the City Council's "straw vote" decisions, made on September 12, 1988. A sunmary of ~e tentative changes that were recarmended fran the Workshop and the Public Hearing are listed as follows: Proposed Budget as presented to City Council at Budget Workshop $11,599,208 1. City Council-Decrease in General Services transferred to Fire Depa.rtIœnt to fund Firefighter EMT 2. Ci ty Council-Decrease in General Services per Budget Workshop 3. Camnmi ty Developnent-Transfer of Fire Inspector to Fire Deparbnent 4. Library-Deletion of Children's Librarian position 5. POlice-Funding of a. School Crossing Guard (Starnes & Holiday) b. (4) Police Officers for 6 months c. Reallocation of funds from salary savings in Police Department to educational ,supplies for Crime Prevention Services. , No effect on budget 6. Fire-Increase in funds transferred from Carmuni ty Developnent Budget for Fire Inspector position 7. Delayed implementation of Employee Benefits Package Total 28,483) 5,811) 34,902) 23,359) 3,500 69,352 -0- 34,902 $11,565,074 49,333) Recarmendation: Approve Ordinance No. 1569 adopting proposed Operating Budget for fiscal year 1988-89. Finance Review __ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget .. Other .. /? _ ) . ~ -m~...ø--- I Department Head Signature I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM N/A . Finance Director City Manager Page 1 of 1 I, I. I 1 1 I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I ORDINANCE NO. 1569 AN ORDINANCE AOOPTING AND APPROVING A BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF NORm RICHIAND HILIS, TEXAS, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER 1ST, 1988 THROUGH SEPrEMBER 30TH, 1989 WHEREAS, an annual operating budget for the fiscal year October 1, 1988 through September 30, 1989 has been prepared by the City Manager for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, and WHEREAS, said budget has been presented by the Ci ty Manager in accordance with the Ci ty Charter, and WHEREAS, public notices of a hearing upon this proposed budget have been published as required, and the public hearing held on said budget, and it is the consensus that the budget, as suhnitted and amended, should be approved, to wi t: General & Debt Service Fi.mds Revenues: General FUnd Debt Service Total Revenues Expenditures: City Council City Manager City Secretary legal Civil Service Mgmt Services/Purchasing Finance Econanic Development Management Infornation Services Municipal Court Conmunity Development Library Envirornnental Services Public Works Parks & Recreation Police Fire Non-Depart:nental Total General FUnd Expenditures Debt Service Requirements Total Expenditures REX:X:I-1MENDED BUDGET AMENDED AND AOOPI'ED BUDGET $11,599,208 3,269,280 $11,565,074 3,269,280 $14,868,488 $14,834,354 $ 58,110 231,252 181,447 83,928 26,660 122,3.98 466,833 99,271 214,580 230,093 464,019 573,163 227,416 1,274,226 661,058 3,638,141 2,295,258 751,355 $11,599,208 3,269,280 $ 29,627 231,252 179,829 83,928 26,536 121,241 465,683 99,271 214,315 229,442 426,147 547,684 225,977 1,273,811 659,309 3,683,328 2,316,339 751,355 11,565,074 3,269,280 $14,868,488 $14,834,354 I I. I I I I I I I fI I I I I I I Ie I I ORDINANCE NO. 1569 Page 'I\vo RæG1MENDED BUDGET AMENDED AND A[X)PTED BUDGET Utility Enterprise Fund Revenues: Water Sewer Interest Income & Misc. Total Revenues $ 7,088,838 4,479,172 575,909 $12,143,919 $ 7,086,510 4,479,172 575,909 $12,141,591 Expendi tures : Public Wbrks/Utili~ Finance/Utility Non-Depart::ræntal Total Expenditures $10,904,873 867,135 371,911 $12,143,919 $10,902,774 866,906 371,911 $12,141,591 Prarotional Fund Revenues $ 110,927 $ 110,709 $ 110,927 $ 110,709 $ 57,000 $ 57,000 $ 57,000 $ 57,000 $ 440,462 $ 425,325 $ 440,462 $ 425,325 $ 2,079,371 $ 2,079,915 $ 2,079,371 $ 2,079,915 $ 1,226,188 $ 1,225,694 $ 1,226,188 $ 1,225,694 Expendi tures Park & Library Fund Revenues Expenditures General/Utility CIP Fund Revenues Expenditures Management Services Fund Revenues Expenditures Self-Insurance Fund Revenues Expenditures THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHIAND HILIS, TEXAS, that the City Council of the Ci ty of North Richland Hills ratify, and approve the budget as filed and amended for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1988 through September 30, 1989. I· I. I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I ORDINANCE NO. 1569 Page Three PASSED AND APPROVED by a majority of the City Council at a meeting in the Council Chamber of the North Richland Hills City Hall on the 26th of September 1988. Tcmny Brown - Mayor ATrEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance Subject: Transfer of Iaidlaw Waste Disposal Fees Ord.ll1ance No. 1555 Council Meeting Date:9/26/88 Agenda Number:GN 88-95 I I I The City charges Laidlaw Waste Disposal a fee of 10% of income for residential users because we bill and collect the customer charges as part of the water and sewer billing. Additionally we charge Laidlaw a 2% franchise tax on all customer collections. Tradi tionall y both of these fees have been included in the General Fund and are budgeted. for expenditure there. The current year estimates are $100,275 for billing incaœ and $33,075 for franchise tax. The auditors in their 1987 management letter expressed concern that the Water and Sewer Fund bears the cost of collecting sani tation charges but does not receive the incane. They recœrnend that sani tation fees be recorded in the Water and Sewer Fund. However, they further state that if the City Council's policy is that the revenue is needed in the General Fund that the policy should be implemented by an interfund transfer. The establishment of an ordinance authorizing the transfer of 10% of the billing incaœ fran the Water & Sewer Enterprise Fund to the General Fund would satisfy the auditor's management letter recœmendation. Recœmendation: It is reccmnended that Ordinance 1555 be approved. Finance Review Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ ~~'9 Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I ORDINANCE NO. 1555 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORm RICHIAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: 1. The collection fee and the franchise tax realized by the City 'from any solid waste disI?Osal contract shall be deI?Osi ted in, and becane a part of , the General Fund of the Ci ty . Passed and approved this 26th day of September, 1988. Tarmy Brown - Mayor ATI'EST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS ro FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney I " CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Management Info:rmation Services Council Meeting Date:9/26/88 Agenda Number:GN 88-96 Subject: ProIX>sed AS/400 Canputer System I I I I I I I CUrrently, the System 36 at City Hall has a maximum disk capacity of 598 megabytes (598,000,000 characters). An extensive evaluation of our data storage utilization was conducted indicating a need to increase our storage capacity as soon as IX>ssible. We are currently reaching our maximum operating capacity during busy periods of the week (i.e. payroll, utility billing) . As the City adds vehicle maintenance, purchasing, cost accounting/arbitrage and average water billing IOOdules, it will necessi tate one of the following options: A. Upgrade current system. A system upgrade would increase the disk capacity to 1.1 gegabytes (1,000,000,000 characters) at an estimated cost of $70,000. No further upgrades would be IX>ssible, and this option \VOuld suffice our data needs for approximately three years. B. Purchase an IBM AS400/Model 30 as proIX>sed in the 88-89 operating budget. The AS400 would inmediately increase our disk capacity to 2.0 gegabytes (2,000,000,000 characters) at a cost of $132,000. The system architecture of the 400 is designed for easy expandability for future growth and will acccmrodate the City's needs to its maximum growth. er options such as dual 36 applications and PC networking were considered and found to be too inefficient. Fi.mding Source 1. Utility/Finance 02-20-01-6500 $ 82,903 2. Finance/General 01-20-01-6500 31,097 3 . General Capital Projects 13-00-95-6500 9,000 4. Utility Capital Projects 02-09-00-6500 9,000 $132,000 Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other _ I, ~ ~~* · Departmen Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM x X- Acct. Number See above SUff~i~S Available 7'í'~ !2-11//~ City Manager . Finance Director Page 1 of 2 I" 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I It should be noted that the funding will not impact the General Fund Budget. Our current system will be sold to offset the cost that is expensed to the General Fund. Recorrmendation: It is recœmended that City Council authorize the Directors of Purchasing and Management Info:r:mation Services to work in conjunction to develop fornal bid s:pecifications, advertise for bids, and report bid results to City Council. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ",'(" CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Purchasing _ Council Meeting Date: 9/26/88 Award of bid to *Miller Business Systems for the Subject: Annual Office Supply Contract Agenda Number: PU 88-51 On September 8, 1988, at 10:00 a.m., bids were opened for the Annual Office Supply Contract. The results are outlined below: Vendor Exceptions Amount of Discount off List 1. Origami Inc. 1 2. Central Office Supply 0 3. Continental Office Supply 1 4. Lenco Office Systems 0 5.* Miller Business Systems 0 35% 40% 42% 46% 46% Vendors Lenco Office Systems and Miller Business Systems submitted a tie bid. The Director of Management Services and the Buyer/ Expeditor made a site visit to each facility and the results are outlined below: Lenco Office Systems Miller Business Systems Square Feet Inventory Number of Full-time Employees Number of Part-time Employees Delivery Vehicles Delivery Personnel 6,000 20,000 155,000 7,000,000 3 300 1 1 2 10 24 20 Miller Business Systems was awarded the contract for fiscal year 1987-88 at a discount rate of 45% and complied with our specifications and needs satisfactorily. This, in combination with the exceptional facilities and inventory will offer us supplies and service, enabling us to carry very little inventory on hand. Presently we are placing orders for four to five departments per day. Recommendation: Award the Annual Office Supply Contract to *Miller Business Systems, the lowest and best bid, with the discount amount of 46% for the fiscal year 1988-89. Finance Review ~ Acct. Number 01-00-00-0705 SUf~dS Available . Finance Director wfj City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 L' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Personnel ttubject: Reccmœndation to Approve Bid for City Property Insurance for 1988-89 Council Meeting Date: 9/26/88 Agenda Number: PU 88-52 We advertised for bids to renew our property insurance which expires October 1, 1988, and received bids fran the following canpanies: C~y ~ting Employer's Casual ty A (8) Insurance Ccmpany Deductible Prernimn $ 1000 $19,617 Wausau Insurance Ccmpany A+ (15) 1000 5000 30,717 29,263 31,716 29,451 22,654 * Hartford Insurance Ccmpany A+ (15) 1000 3000 5000 Nationwide Insurance A+ (15) 1000 3000 5000 25000 50,259 49,195 48,706 43,576 The bid specifications required bidders to have an A.M. Best financial and management aating of A+ (10) or higher. Employer's Casualty rating of A (8) is below the minimum .equirement of the specifications and we therefore reccmnend that their bid be disqualified. Of the remaining bids, it has been detennined that the Hartford Insurance Ccrnpany's bid of a $5000 deductible with an annual premium of $22,654 best suits the needs of the City. . Reccmnendation: ~ I I ~ It is recœmended that the City Council accept the Hartford Insurance Ccmpany's bid of a $5000 deductible with an annual premium of $22,654* and award Hartford the City's property insurance coverage for 1988-89. L Source of Funds: I Bonds (GO/Rev.) _perating Budget X ~ther ~.' Department Head ~ature Finance Review Acct. Number 08-01-00-4500; Sufficient unds Avai lable 77h: ~- ,- kl1ß~ City Manager 08-02-00-4500 . Finance Director I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 ... ., ,~~.../.'~ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: Purchasing ~ New Fire Station ~ubject: 6801 Glenview I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Council Meeting Date: - Replacement for Fire Station 2, Agenda Number: 9/26/88 PU 88-53 On June 9, 1986, the City Council authorized retaining Phillip Swager & Associates to prepare plans and specifications for the construction of a fire station at 4001 Rufe Snow Drive, to replace Fire Station 2 located at 6801 Glenview. Bonds for this portion of the 1985 bond election for Fire Protection improvements are scheduled to be sold in March or April of 1989, with construction bids to be taken in approximately June or July. A representative of Phillip Swager and Associates will be at the Pre-Council Meeting September 26, 1988, to present to Council the preliminary architect's rendering for approval and respond to any questions Council may have. Funding Source: Funds to be Available Funds Required Proposed 1989 Bond Sale Unspecified Fire Bond Funds $300,000 116,000 $416,000 Construction Estimate Architect's Fee $373,273 42,095 $415,368 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the preliminary concept plan for Fire Station 2, with any modifications that may be desired. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available 1==:\. (;v%t , Finance Director pepartment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Paqe 1 of 1