Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1988-10-10 Agendas I I I I I I I ~I ~I ,~I tl :;1 -......."...........:..... ~ 1,1 I - I ;',¡:,c.,',''';>- ... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 10, 1988 - 6:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Ordinance No. 1572, Proposed Amendment to Ordinance No. 1080 (Zoning Ordinance) Regarding Signs (Agenda Item No. 16) (15 Minutes) 2. GN 88-97 Amendment to Water Service Contract with the City of Fort Worth, Ordinance No. 1568 (Agenda Item No. 19) (5 Minutes) 3. GN 88-98 Contract for Golf Course Engineering (Agenda Item No. 20) (15 Minutes) 4. PW 88-39 Approval of Change Order No. 13 - Watauga Road Paving and Drainage Improvements (Agenda Item No. 23) (5 Minutes) 5. Mayors Council Water Contract Renegotiation Committee - Mayor Brown (15 Minutes) 6. Possible Work Session (5 Minutes) 7. Other Items (10 Minutes) I I I I I I I ":;1 'I !?I I ;1 ',I "I ,I ~I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN * 8. Executive Session (10 Minutes) a. Litigation 9. Adjourn - 7:20 p.m. *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 10, 1988 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Ca 11 to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Special Meeting September 20, 1988 5. Minutes of the Regular Meeting September 26, 1988 6. Presentation of Proclamation - Car Care Month 7. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 8. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, & 23) I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. PZ 88-14 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of the North Richland Hills Baptist Church to rezone Lots A thru F and G-2 Calloway Acres Addition, Lots 3 thru 17 and a portion of Lot C, Parchman Addition and Tracts 4A1 and 4A2, A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630, from C-l (Commercial), R-7 (Multi-family) and U (Institutional) to U (Institutional) (Located South of Glenview Drive between Vance Road and Scruggs Drive) 10. Ordinance No. 1570 11. PZ 88-15 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Mildred Kidwell to Rezone Tract 7A and a portion of Tract 7A6, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266 from AG (Agriculture) to OC (Outdoor Commercial) (Located on Davis Boulevard northeast of Timber Drive) 12. Ordinance No. 1571 I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 13. PZ 88-17 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of the City of North Richland Hills to rezone a portion of Tracts 2F and 2B, T. Akers Survey, Abstract 19 from I-2 (Industrial) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located north of Loop 820 and bounded on the west by Haltom City) 14. Ordinance No. 1573 15. PZ 88-16 Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendment to Ordinance No. 1080 (Zoning Ordinance) Regarding Signs 16. Ordinance No. 1572 *17. PS 88-7 Request of Several Homeowners to Replat Lots 10R-I1R, Block 9, Lots lR-9R, Block 6, Haltom Ranchland Addition, and Lots 3R-5R, and 7R, Block 4, Diamond Loch North Addition (Located on the south side of Tabor Street between Rufe Snow Drive and Diamond Loch North) I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *18. PS 88-21 Consideration of a Variance request from Immanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church on Tract A, Block 7, Holiday Heights Addition for Calloway Branch Creek *19. GN 88-97 Amendment to Water Service Contract with the City of Fort Worth, Ordinance No. 1568 *20. GN 88-98 Contract for Golf Course Engineering *21. GN 88-99 Utility Lock Box Services/Printing Services *22. PW 88-38 Approval of Change Order No. 3 _ Grapevine Highway Water System Improvements *23. PW 88-39 Approval of Change Order No. 13 _ Watauga Road Paving and Drainage Improvements 24. Citizens Presentation Mrs. Mary Lou Smathers Day 7509 Chapman Re: Chapman Road Assessment 25. Adjournment I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I II I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 20, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order September 20, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Mayor Richard Davis Mayor Pro Tem Lyle Welch Councilman Mack Garvin Councilman Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman Byron Sibbet Councilman Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire City Manager Senior Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney Absent: Virginia Moody Linda Spurlock Councilwoman Councilwoman 3. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION A. PERSONNEL B. BRIEFING ON PENDING LITIGATION C. REVIEW OF PROGRESS ON LAND ACQUISITION Executive Session was not held. 4. PU 88-50 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR ACQUISITION OF LAND FROM RICHMOND BAY DEVELOPMENT _ RESOLUTION NO. 88-33 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Resolution No. 88-33. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that regarding Section 1.3b, it was his understanding that if the City was able to acquire the property, the City would be given the $89,000. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 20, 1988 Page 2 Mr. Sanford stated that the last section stated that if there were not costs for the land, the money would be paid to the City at the opening of the golf course. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that Section 2.3f regarding signs - the City might have a problem with Haltom City on the sign and asked if that potential problem had been solved. Mr. Frank stated it was his understanding that if North Richland Hills granted Meadow Lakes the space they would go to Haltom City and try to acquire permission for the sign. Mr. Sanford stated he would like to have the wording in the contract changed to state "the City would allow the sign for five years or until all of the lots were sold, whichever came first". Mayor Pro Tem Davis referred to Section 4.1c pertaining to railroad easement - and asked Mr. Frank if he had already obtained the easement. Mr. Frank stated they had an easement from the railroad to the former developer and they would insert the City of North Richland Hills and Recreational Services Limited. Mr. Frank stated it would be a permanent easement for the City and a temporary easement for the contractor. Mr. Line stated he would suggest that the closing date be changed from October 11th to October 10th because the City at the time did not think that the proceeds of the sale of the certificates of obligation would be received until October 15th and wanted to have the closing prior to that date. Mr. Line stated that he learned Friday that the proceeds of the sale would be delivered Monday, October 11th and wanted to move the closing to October 10th so the City would know they had the land before they accepted delivery of the bonds. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if the City was getting an Owner's Title Policy on the property. Mr. McEntire stated no, it would be a Special Warranty Deed. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked that the Staff to be instructed to look into the cost effective means of possibly getting an Owner's Title Policy. Motion, with changes as noted, carried 5-0. 5. GN 88-79 APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE CHANGING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE NO. 1543 FROM OCTOBER 1, 1988 TO DECEMBER 1, 1988 _ ORDINANCE NO. 1566 APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve Ordinance No. 1566. Motion carried 5-0. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 20, 1988 Page 3 6. GN 88-80 APPROVAL OF MANAGEMENT CONTRACT WITH RECREATIONAL SERVICES LIMITED - RESOLUTION NO. 88-35 APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve Resolution No. 88-35. Mayor Brown stated that under Section 2(d) - Start-Up Budget, on what they were going to purchase did not mention golf carts. Mr. McEntire stated they may want to lease the golf carts. Mr. Line stated that if golf carts were not mentioned somewhere else in the contract, it needed to be added. Mr. McEntire stated the wording would be changed to purchase and/or lease and would include adequate golf carts. Mayor Brown referred to Item 5 - Clubhouse and Other Start-up Items funded by the City shall be the property or obligation of RSL and asked if the City was going to purchase them. Mr. McEntire stated the contract was talking about other than those items which were purchased with the start-up items. Mayor Brown referred to Item 9 - Upon Termination of the Agreement _ RSl would sell, transfer and assign all of the assets which would properly be reflected on the Financial Statements of the facility. Mayor Brown asked sell to who. Mr. McEntire stated to the City. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the wording "all assets will be assigned to the City" needed to be added. Councilman Sibbet referred to Section 2(a) - Major Decisions - and asked if the decisions for major purchases would be approved by the City Manager or Council. Mr. Line stated he did not contemplate that any prior approval for expenditures other than items not budgeted for would have to be approved. Councilman Welch asked how the course would be policed once it was operational. Mr. Line stated after it started operation someone on the staff would be assigned responsibility for supervision of the golf course operator and during the construction period George Tucker would monitor. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked Marty Streiff if he would have a problem with working with the Park and Recreation Board looking at updates and changes to the policies of the operation. I ' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 20, 1988 Page 4 Mr. Streiff replied no. Motion, with changes as noted, carried 5-0. 7. GN 88-81 APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION CONTRACT WITH RECREATIONAL SERVICES LIMITED _ RESOLUTION NO. 88-36 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Resolution No. 88-36. Mayor Pro Tem Davis referred to Item 7(c) - Full Time Site Superintendent and Inspector - and asked if that had been budgeted for. Mr. Sanford stated that was a part of Recreational Services Limited's proposal. Motion carried 5-0. 8. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 26, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order September 26, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. Present: Tommy Brown Richard Davis Lyle Welch Mack Garvin Byron Sibbet Linda Spurlock Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Richard Albin 2. ROLL CALL Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilman Councilwoman City Manager Senior Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney City Engineer Absent: Virginia Moody Councilwoman Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman 3. INVOCATION Councilman Sibbet gave the invocation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 APPROVED Councilman Garvin stated that at the September 12, 1988 Council Meeting, he made a motion on Item No. 14, in respect to some rezoning and left out part of the motion which was a positive type zoning that needed to be added. Councilman Garvin stated the motion was relative to industrial zoning off of Amundson Road and a portion of the property right north of Watauga Road and as his motion was stated that property would have been industrial, the intent was for that to be C-1. Councilman Garvin stated he would like to amend his motion on Ordinance No. 1564 by adding lithe property situated north of Watauga Road that particular tract of land be zoned C-I (Commercial). Mayor Pro Tern Davis seconded the amendment. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 26, 1988 Page 2 Motion carried 3-0; Councilwoman Spurlock and Councilman Welch abstaining due to absence from the meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the minutes of September 12, 1988 as amended. Motion carried 3-0; Councilwoman Spurlock and Councilman Welch abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 5. PRESENTATION OF GREEN THUMB AWARD TO JASON MERIT, DISTRICT MANAGER OF TWO PESOS (PRESENTATION TO BE MADE BY BRUCE AULD AND WANDA STRONG, NORTHEAST TARRANT COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE) Mr. Bruce Auld, President of Northeast Tarrant County Chamber of Commerce, introduced Ms. Wanda Strong, Chairman of Project Pride. Ms. Strong presented the Green Thumb Award to Mr. Jason Merit, Manager for Two Pesos. 6. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Davis removed Item No. 24 from the Consent Agenda. 7. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 & 31) Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 5-0. 8. GN 88-82 APPOINTMENTS TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the following appointments to the Board of Adjustment. Place 2 Place 4 Place 6 Jim Kemp Jeff Bunting Harold Schubert Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Motion carried 5-0. 9. GN 88-83 APPOINTMENTS TO BOARD OF APPEALS Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the following appointments to the Board of Appeals. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 26, 1988 Page 3 Place 2 Place 4 Place 6 Place 7 (Alternate) Joe Crane Mary Norwood Robert Skinner Eric Hill Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Motion carried 5-0. 10. GN 88-84 APPOINTMENTS TO CABLE TV BOARD Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to approve the following appointments to the Cable TV Board. Place 2 Place 4 Place 6 George Angle Ray Fulenwider Pat Carruth Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Motion carried 5-0. 11. GN 88-85 APPOINTMENTS TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to approve the following appointments to the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee. Place 2 Place 4 Alternate David Barfield David Green Patricia Marin Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Motion carried 5-0. 12. GN 88-86 APPOINTMENTS TO CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve the following appointments to the Civil Service Commission. Place 2 (Alternate) Place 4 Place 6 (Alternate) Place 7 Bernard R. Roux George Pederson Steve Hall Bob Roark Term expires October, 1989 Term expires October, 1989 Term expires October, 1989 Term expires October, 1989 Motion carried 5-0. 13. GN 88-87 APPOINTMENTS TO LIBRARY BOARD Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the following appointments to the Library Board. Place 2 Place 4 Jan Daniels Roxie Hamilton Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 26, 1988 Page 4 Place 6 Alternate Kay Schmidt A 1 i s a Wood Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Motion carried 5-0. 14. GN 88-88 APPOINTMENTS TO PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the following appointments to the Parks and Recreation Board. Place 2 Place 4 Place 6 Wade Parkey Don Tipps Douglass Davis Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Motion carried 5-0. 15. GN 88-89 APPOINTMENTS TO BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve the following appointments to the Beautification Committee. Place 1 Place 2 Place 3 Place 4 Place 5 Place 6 Place 7 Katheryne Robinson Juanita Kemp Robert Powers Janice Davis Alice Scoma Arfan Jabri Pat Fisher Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Motion carried 5-0. 16. GN 88-90 APPOINTMENTS TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the following appointments to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Place 2 Place 4 Alternate David Barfield David Green Patricia Marin Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Term expires September, 1990 Motion carried 5-0. *17. GN 88-91 CERTIFIED TAX ROLL - RESOLUTION NO. 88-30 APPROVED *18. GN 88-92 GRANTING OF EXEMPTIONS FY 1988-89 _ RESOLUTION NO. 88-37 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ,I I I I I I I Ie I September 26, 1988 Page 5 APPROVED *19. GN 88-93 SETTING TAX RATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 - ORDINANCE NO. 1567 APPROVED *20. GN 88-94 ADOPTING BUDGET FY 1988-89 - ORDINANCE NO. 1569 APPROVED *21. GN 88-95 TRANSFER OF LAIDLAW WASTE DISPOSAL FEES - ORDINANCE NO. 1555 APPROVED *22. GN 88-96 PROPOSED AS/400 COMPUTER SYSTEM APPROVED *23. PU 88-51 AWARD OF BID TO MILLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS FOR THE ANNUAL OFFICE SUPPLY CONTRACT APPROVED 24. PU 88-52 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE BID FOR CITY PROPERTY INSURANCE FOR 1988-89 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve PU 88-52 authorizing City Staff to execute a contract with Employer's Casualty Insurance, deductible of $1,000, premium of $19,617 and waive the bid requirement of A+10 rating. Ms. Jerry Sheeran, representing Key and Piskurant and Sherran Insurance Company, Arlington, appeared before the Council. Ms. Sheeran stated she wanted to make a protest to the exception of the bid from Employers and the changing of the specifications. Ms. Sheeran stated the specifications were published and her agency went by the bid information which said the bidder must be A+10 or better. Ms. Sheeran stated this was not going by the bid specs to after the fact accept the bid and change the specs to fit that particular bidder. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he did not think the Council was changing the bid specifications just so the bid of Employer's could be accepted. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated it was dollars and cents to the Council and was saving approximately $12,000. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 26, 1988 Page 6 Ms. Sheeran stated that in that case she felt it should be rebid with the lesser bid ratings. Councilwoman Spurlock stated she felt that if the specifications were changed it was not fair because perhaps other companies would have bid if the specifications had been lower. Councilman Sibbet stated there was a possibility that the bid would have been better from other companies if the bid package had specified the lower ratings. Ms. Sheeran stated her agency went exactly by what was on the bid. Councilman Sibbet stated if the specifications were put out that way he felt the City needed to consider it and live with it. Councilwoman Spurlock asked if the City had a deadline on obtaining the insurance. Mr. Line stated the current policy expired October 1st. Mr. Line asked Mr. McEntire if it would be possible to get a rider and extend the expiration date for a month. Mr. McEntire asked Ms. Sheeran if Hartford would give the City a thirty day rider in order for the City to have time to rebid the insurance. Ms. Sheeran stated she would check with her company and let the City know first thing in the morning. After further discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to add an amendment to the motion stating subject to provisions of acceptance of a thirty-day binder from the existing carrier and if rebidding could be done by the October 24th Council Meeting. Motion carried 5-0. *25. PU 88-53 NEW FIRE STATION - REPLACEMENT FOR FIRE STATION #2, 6801 GLENVIEW APPROVED *26. PU 88-54 REJECTING ALL BIDS (PROPOSALS) ON GOLF COURSE - RESOLUTION NO. 88-38 APPROVED *27. PU 88-55 PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM JENNY COLEMAN, ET AL FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING SMITHFIELD ROAD (PARCEL #3) APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I September 26, 1988 Page 7 *28. PW 88-34 APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 _ GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *29. PW 88-35 APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 10 - WATAUGA ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *30. PW 88-36 APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 11 - WATAUGA ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *31. PW 88-37 APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 _ WATAUGA ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED 32. CIITZEN PRESENTATION Ms. Myrtis Byrd, Byrd Automotive, appeared before the Council. ~ Ms. Byrd stated the month of October had been designated as "Car Care Month". Ms. Byrd briefed the Council on what the organization did. Ms. ~rd stated there would be a car care event October 28th and 29th at North Hills Mall and invited the Council to attend. 33. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I Ie· I ~~ ~ eity of ~orth ~cWand Hills I I I I I I WHEREAS, the cftizenð 0-6 the c.uy 0-6 NoJr.:th R.lclr1.and. H~ have ex.pILe.ð-6ed. the.út -6t1long du.úLe -6oIL -6a6eJt C.lVLð, a cleaneJt and heaf..tJúeJt env.úLonment, and. the C.OnðeJtvailon 0-6 eneJtgy ILUOWlC.U¡ and I WHEREAS, the pllOPeJl Uðe 0-6 -6ue.tð and emi..6-6ionð c.o l'ttJLoR.. equipment c.o tttJr.-lbutu to b åteJl o.Á.Jt qualäy and mOILe eir61-c.lent OPeJLa.ti.Ott 0-6 veJúclu¡ and Ie WHEREAS, ILoutine C.M malntenanc.e hað been -6hown to be a c.otttJr.-lbutoIL to automob.i1.e -6a6áy, etthattc.ed. ..}uel ec.o nomy and Iled.UC.ed. C.M e.mrn.i.ð-6.l0 nð j arui I WHEREAS, Oc.tobeJl ið an oppoJr.:tune :time to pILepMe automob.llu -6oIL winteJt'-6 hazMdoUð ~ving c.o~Onð by p~ollming pILeventive maintenanc.e¡ and WHEREAS, automotive -6eJtv.lc.e að-6ouailOttð arui otheJl pubUc. .ð eJtv.lc.e gILoup-6 Me að.M..óting motoJLi..ðu .In lealltúng about pllOpeJt c.aJt c.aJLe¡ and I WHEREAS, the State' -6 PubUc. Sa6ety VeplVLtment -6uUy -6UPPoJtU pllogJtaJ'nð thlLt .únpllove the -6a6e and eir61-uent opeJULtiOtt 0-6 vehiclu. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Tommy Bllown, MayolL 0-6 the c.uy 0-6 NoJtth R.lc.hland H~, do heJteby pILocla1.m the month 0-6 OctobeJt, 1988 að: I I CAR CARE MONTH I in the C.uy o..} NolLth R.lc.h1and. H~ and LVlge ail cftizettð to .j o.ltt in tÝLÚ> ei,.601Lt . I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heJleunto -6 á my han.d and c.aUð ed. the Seal 0-6 the C.u.y 0-6 NolLth R.lc.hland H~ to be ~ed. tÝLÚ> 10th day 0-6 OctobeJt, 1988. I Ie Tommy Bllown - MayolL I ,..; . I I Department: _Ubject: I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Economic Development 10/10/88 - Council Meeting Date: Public Hearing on Request of the North Richland Hills A !nd N PZ 88-14 BaptI.st l;hurch to Rezone Lots A through F and G-2, CalÜ~aya umber: Acres Addition, Lots 3 through 17 and a Portion of Lot~C, ~ Parchman Addition, and Tracts 4A1 and 4A2, A. G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630 from Cl, R-7-MF & U to U. Ordinance No. 1570 This Rezoning Request is presented on the property located south of Glenview Drive between Vance Road and Scruggs Drive. The requested rezoning is from C-1, Commercial, R-7-MF Multi-Family and U Institutional to U Instutional. Church use is allowed in C-1 and R-7-MF as a conditional use. However, the applicants, in working with the City Staff are requesting the U Zone District for clarification and to aid in updating the City's Land Use Maps. It is the intention of the applicants to construct additional church facilities on the subject properties. RECOMMENDATION: 4IÞThe Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 88-14 be approved. The City Council should hold the required Public Hearing and act upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget 4IÞ Other ~ Departme Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Q~~ /j~{J1I-- t Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of __~ C-2 dSU· 1215 L u ?1:~-\~ c.-\ ) JL-1-m f J U. -rO U o 500 ~~~- 1000 1500 2000 2roo 3000 I P OF RTH c I Page 2 P & Z Minutes September 8, 1988 ( Ie I I I I I I I 1. PZ 88-14 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Sanford stated this property · north of the freeway, bounde the west by Haltom City and he east by the new golf cours operty. Chairman winger called for those wis to speak in opposition to this quest to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 88-17. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 7-0. Mr. Wood requested that he be allowed to step down for the next item. Request of North Richland Hills Baptist Church to rezone Lots A thru F and G-2, Calloway Acres Addition, Lots 3 thru 17 and a portion of Lot C, Parchman Addition, and Tracts 4A1 and 4A2, A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630 from their present classifications of C-1 Commercial, R-7-MF Multi-Family and U Institutional to U Institutional. This property is located south of Glenview Drive between Vance Road and Scruggs Drive, 4001 Vance Road. Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mark Wood came forward to represent the church. He stated they want to consolidate all property the church owns into one zoning classification in anticipation of the upcoming plat. Mr. Wood stated they now have three different zonings on the property. Chairman Schwinger called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. · , I Page 3 p & Z Minutes September 8, 1988 ( Ie I I PZ 88-14 APPROVED I I I 2. PZ 88-15 I I Ie I I I I I I I I I ( There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 88-14. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 6-0. Mr. Wood returned to the Commission. Request of Mildred Kidwell to rezone Tract 7A and a portion of Tract 7 S. Richardson Survey, Abstract from their present classifica AG Agriculture to OC Outdoo Commercial. This propert is located on Davis Boulevard, nor east of Timber Drive. Chairman Schwinge opened the Public Hearing and ca d for those wishing to speak in or of this request to please com forward. idwell came forward. He stat they wish to make use of this erty for a golf driving range. Mr. Bowen asked Mr. Kidwell if they would object to restricting it to a driving range only. Mr. Kidwell said that is all they are considering at this time, but he would hate to not be allowed to have a kid's soccer field there. Mr. Bowen read several of the things that could be put in Outdoor Commercial. He said they could restrict it to Commercial Recreation. Mr. Kidwell said they would agree to that. Mr. Barfield asked if he plans to have restroom facilities. He said you would have to have water supply. '. '-. - -~. ... .. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas August 25, 1988 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 88-14 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM 'C-l,R-7-MF,U' TO U REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 148 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. SU.S1"l~ ~. Sc I-.~~ SUSAN L. SCHVINGER,G.C.E. SLS/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic "Development Director Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning Zoning Review PZ 88-14 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I 'I I I I -- I I . . ORDINANCE NO. 1570 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE ¡ . WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE 81080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-14 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-l, R-7-MF, and U to U. BEING a tract of land out of the A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of Calloway Acres Addition as recorded in Volume 388-J, Page 13 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County and a portion of Parchman Addition as recorded in Volume 388-W, Page 40 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of Lot A, said Calloway Acres Addition; Thence East, along and with the North line of said Calloway Acres Addition a distance of 250.0 feet to the intersection of said North line of Calloway Acres Addition with the West right-of-way of Parchman Street; THENCE continuing East, a distance of 50.0 feet to lthe intersection of lthe East R.O.W. of said Parchman Street with the South R.O.W. of Glenview Drive; THENCE continutng East, along and with the South R.O.W. of Glenview Drive, a distance of 347.5 feet to the intersection of said South R.O.W. of Glenview Drive with the West R.O.W. of Vance Road; THENCE South, along and with the West R.O.W. of said Vance Road and the East lines of Lots 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, and 4 of said Parchman Addition, a distance of 658.8 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 4; THENCE East, a distance of 6.0 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 3, said Parchman Addition; THENCE South, along and with the East lines of Lots 3 and C, said Parchman Addition, a distance of 147.0 feet to a point; THENCE North 89 degrees 36 minutes West, a distance of 176.2 feet to a point on the East line of Lot 7, said Parchman Addition; I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -- I I Page 2 THENCE South, along and with the East line of said Lot 17; a distance of 185.2 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 17; THENCE South 47 degrees 58 minutes West, along and with the South line of said Lot 17, a distance of 238.6 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot 17; THENCE North, along and with the West lines of Lots 17, 16, 15, 14, 13 and 12 of said Parchman Addition, same being the East R.O.W. of Parchman Street, a distance of 729.9 feet to a point on· the West line of said Lot 12; THENCE West, a distance of 50.0 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot G-2, Calloway Acres Addition; THENCE continuing West, along and with the South line of said Lot G-2, a distance of 125.0 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot G-2, same being the Southeast corner of Log G-l, said Calloway Acres Addition; THENCE North, along and with the common boundary of Lots G-l and G-2, a distance of 75.0 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot G-2, same being the Northeast corner of Lot G-l; THENCE West, along and with the common boundary of Lots G-l and F, a distance of 125.0 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot F, same being the Northwest corner of Lot G-l; THENCE North, along and with the West lines of Lots F, E, D and A, said Calloway Acres Addition, same being the East R.O.W. of Scruggs Drive, a distance of 344.7 feet to the place of beginning and containing 10.2 acres of land, more or less. This property is located south of Glenview Drive between Vance Road and Scruggs Drive, 4001 Vance Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. ~J2 , ~~~~)¡~ SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I" I Page 3 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-88-14 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS J CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I I I I I I I I )1 :i/l I I I I I I Source of Funds: I Bonds (GO/Rev.) · A. . Operating Budget I- Other r!Á Dep rtme CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Economic Development Subject: 10/10/88 - Council Meeting Date: Public Hearing on Request of Mildred Kidwell to Rezone PZ 88-15 Tract /A and a 1"ortJ.on of 7A6, s. R.1chardson Survey, Agenda Number: Abstract 1266, from AG to OC Outdoor Commercial ~ Ordinance No. 1571 This Rezoning Request is presented on vacant property located on Davis Boulevard, northeast of Timber Drive. The requested rezoning if from AG Agriculture to OC Outdoor Commercial. The applicant wishes to construct a golf-driving range facility on the subject property. At the Public Hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission, several citizens who reside on Timber Drive spoke not so much against the rezoning but on how the range was to be constructed in relationship to their property. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 88-15 be approved with the stipulation that it be limited to recreational use only and at the end of a five year period the use be re-examined by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. The City Council should hold the required Public Hearing and act upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ---cjA~~~ ¿¡)~¢ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I R-2 C-I 1254 R-2 222 C-I 1198 C-I SU AG R-3 0-1 I 0-1 AG 1311,1318,1319. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 3 p & Z Minutes September 8, 1988 ( ( There being no one the Chairman clo Heari made the motion to approve PZ 88-14. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 6-0. Mr. Wood returned to the Commission. 2. PZ 88-15 Request of Mildred Kidwell to rezone Tract 7A and a portion of Tract 7A6, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to OC Outdoor Commercial. This property is located on Davis Boulevard, northeast of Timber Drive. Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Curtis Kidwell came forward. He stated they wish to make use of this property for a golf driving range. Mr. Bowen asked Mr. Kidwell if they would object to restricting it to a driving range only. Mr. Kidwell said that is all they are considering at this time, but he would hate to not be allowed to have a kid's soccer field there. Mr. Bowen read several of the things that could be put in Outdoor Commercial. He said they could restrict it to Commercial Recreation. Mr. Kidwell said they would agree to that. Mr. Barfield asked if he plans to have restroom facilities. He said you would have to have water supply. ~ I Page 4 ( P & Z Minutes 1_ September 8, 1988 I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I , I ( Mr. Kidwell stated they already have a water tap on the property. Chairman Schwinger asked Mr. Kidwell if they would agree to Commercial Recreation only. Mr. Kidwell stated they would agree to recreational use only. Mr. Barfield said some driving ranges are lighted. He asked if they plan to light this one. Mr. Kidwell said they do plan to light it. Mr. Tucker stated there are strict guidelines in the Zoning Ordinance regarding lighting. Chairman Schwinger called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Roger Martin, 8633 Timber Drive, came forward. He said his property is adjacent to this property. He said he has questions for Mr. Kidwell regarding lighting and where the driving range would be located. Mr. Martin stated they have problems with the lights from the City Park, but they shut down around 10:00 or 10:30. Mr. Kidwell stated the driving range would be adjoining Davis Boulevard. He said Mr. Martin's property is further down. Mr. Kidwell said the lights they would have would not be as good as the city's, but they plan to shut down about 10:00 o'clock. Mr. Wood asked how far the driving range would be from Mr. Martin's house. Mr. Kidwell said there would be a tree line between. · ~ I Page 5 P & Z Minutes September 8, 1988 ( ( ~ I James Hanson, 8613 Timber Drive, came forward. He asked if they plan to have concessions, hamburgers, etc. I I Mr. Kidwell stated they do not intend to have anything like that. He said they might have cold drinks. I Mr. Barfield asked Mr. Kidwell to show where the driving range would be. Mr. Martin and Mr. Hanson came forward to see how close it would be to their houses. I I Mr. Barfield said the people's back yards could be in line. He said the Tee Boxes would be 250 feet from Davis Boulevard and the drive is 1400 feet. Mr. Barfield said a 300 yard drive could possibly hit the back yards. I ~ Mr. Martin said the OC would continue down behind his house. I I Chairman Schwinger called for anyone else wishing to speak to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. I PZ 88-15 APPROVED Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PZ 88-15 with the stipulation that the OC be limited to recreational use and at the end of 5 years this request be brought back before the Commission. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0. I I I I , I 3. PZ 88-17 4. PZ 88-16 PZ 88-16 APPROVED This item was moved of the agenda. amendment to Zoning regarding signs. Mr. Bowen made the motion to recommend approval of this amendment to the City Council. This motion was seconded by Mr. Barfield and the motion carried 7-0. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I~ I (. ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas August 25, 1988 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 88-15 REVIEY LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO OC REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 35 Ye have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. &.S~N cJ... s:c"'~~ SUSAN L. SCHYINGER,G.C.E. SLS/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic-Development Director Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning Zoning Review PZ 88-15 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 pz.. ¡ 3- IS I FIELD NOTES FOR: ZONING PURPOSES ONLY ------~-_. ._-~-.--.-- --~- --..------------. ---._---_.__.. _..--- I I I BEING a tract of land out of the STEPHEN RICHARDSON SURVEY, Abstract No. 1266, Tarrant County, Texas, being described as follows: BEGINN ING a t an iron .P in sit \la ted at the Nort heas t corner of tract of land recorded in Volume 3398, Page 382, Deed Records, 'rarran t C()un t y, 'Texas; I I THENCE North 87 degrees 34 minutes West 188.4 feet to an iron pin for corner in the Southeasterly R.O.W. line of State Highway No. 1938; THENCE North 30 degrees 40 minutes East along said R.O.W. 733.5 feet to an iron pin for corner; I I THENCE South 26 degrees 35 minutes 49 seconds East 1462.16 feet t () an iron pln for corner~ THENCE South 79 degrees 33 minutes 42 seconds West 527.02 feet to an iron I)in for c()rner: THENCE North 88 degrees 20 minutes 40 seconds East 136.35 feet to an iron pin for corner; I I THENCE North 00 degrees 04 minutes 23 seconds East 30.0 feet to an iron pln for corner; I THENCE North 03 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds West 216.73 feet to an iron pin for corner; I THENCE North 87 degrees 01 minutes 28 seconds West 156.54 feet to an iron pin for corner; I THENCE North 01 òegree 39 minutes 20 seconds West 513.8 feet to the place of beginning and containing 15.61 acres of land more or less. I I I I N . . SCALE 1" ;: LEGEND . IRON PIN o !RON PIPE A BOIS DARC STAKE o CONCRETE MON -x-x- FENCE - "- "- POWER liNE - T - T - TELEPHONE LINE -CATV - CABLE 1ELEVISION SHADED AREA DEStG NATES CONCRETE CHARLES B HOOKS. JR \ -{)', . 3946 , Q- </. -v 'V 0 :S' . . ~ ~l S T t_ µ.~. '....\.. (. Ie s'u~'\1~ 88-886 LOYD BRANSOM SURVEYORS INC. CHARLES B HOOKS JR. REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR 1028 NORTH SYLVANIA AVE. FT. WORTH. TEXAS 76111 834-3477 ¡ [) 0 HER E Bye E R T IF Y T HAT T HIS M A. PIS T R U L A I\¡ ~') COR R E: (T A S SUR V EYE DON r HE G RO UNO AND THE A EAR E NO f AS E M E ~n S 0 R fNGPO"GHM~P THA~..WN · ,/ ,/f 8-15-88 DATE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~~Alr ?IPGLI/V~ ~ ",Cb ~~~ 4.J o· S' ~ , o ~ ~~ <b ~~ ",'" ,,~ ,(y ~ ~ ~\I -~ ' t::)~ ~ - ...,~ ~~ A...~ Ci;) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '-) , ~ ~ IS. ~/ IIC,f.Ç5 SHAD'16ROVE V I C I NIT Y MA P ~ ~ , ~!t) " " " ~\'t ~ ~ ~ ~~ S1,·33'.f-~"W ~ 5:)' N ¿1¿1 ~ ()' 4¿J'e' <:) ~ / 3~.a5' ~ ~ N FOR ZONING PURPOSES ONLY . A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE STEPHEN RICHARDS()N SUR\/EY, AE3S1'RACT 1\]0 . 1266, rrA R RANT COlJNTY , 'TEXAS . SEE ATTACHED FIELD NOTES SCALE 1 " :: 20tJ' LEGEND . IRON P1N o IRON PIPE l:1 BOIS DARC STAKE o CONCRETE MON -x-x- F6NCE - ~ - "- POWER LINE - T - T - TELEPHONE lIN E -CATV - CABLE TELEVISION SHADED AREA DESIGNATES CONCRETE LOYD BRANSOM SURVEYORS INC. CHARLES B HOOKS JR. REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR 1028 NORTH SYLVANIA AVE. FT. WORTH. TEXAS 76111 834-3477 I DC H~AE8Y cER1¡Ff THAT THIS MAP IS TRUE A~D CORRECT AS SURvEYED .jN THE GROUND. AND THEAE ARE NO EASEMENTS OR ENCROACHMlN rs VISfBLl OTHER THAN T Sf SHOWN DATE 8 - 1 5 - _8_8 , - I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I ORDINANCE NO. 1571 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE · ~ WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE 01080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-15 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to OC with the stipulation that it be limited to recreational use and at the end of 5 years this request be brought back before the Commission. BEING a tract of land out of the Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, Tarrant County, Texas, being described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin situated at the Northeast corner of tract of land recorded in Volume 3398, Page 382, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 87 degrees 34 minutes West 188.4 feet to an iron pin for corner in the Southeast erly R.O.W. line of State Highway No. 1938; THENCE North 30 degrees 40 minutes East along said R.O.W. 733.5 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE South 26 degrees 35 minutes 49 seconds East 1462.16 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE South 79 degrees 33 minutes 42 seconds West 527.02 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE North 88 degrees 20 minutes 40 seconds East 136.35 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 04 minutes 23 seconds East 30.0 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE North 03 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds West 216.73 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE North 87 degrees 01 minutes 28 seconds West 156.54 feet to an iron pin for coarner; THENCE North 01 degree 39 minutes 20 seconds West 513.8 feet to the place of beginning and containing 15.61 acres of land more or less. .. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .. Page 2 This property is located on Davis Boulevard, northeast of Timber Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. THIS 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. C ~ ~~\?~~ SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZON G COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-88-15 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: &Ubject: I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Economic Development 10/10/88 - Council Meeting Date: Public Hearing on Request of the City of North Richlan~ HillsN b genCfã urn er: to Kezone a ~ort~on of lraCts 2F and 2ß, T.ARers 5uLve, ' Abstract 19 from 1-2 Industrial to R-2 Single Family." ", Ordinance No. 1573 PZ 88-17 This Rezoning Request is presented on the vacant property located north of Loop 820 and bounded on the west by Haltom City. The requested rezoning is from 1-2 Industrial to R-2 Single Family. "RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 88-17 be approved. The City Council should hold the required Public Hearing and act upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget _ Other - ~L1/~ ad Signature ~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Fmance Director ~ ~" Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I !~ 1414 1-2 .\ I I I 1-2 \194 1-2 I I I Ie I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS SEPTEMBER 8, 1988 7:30 P. M. CONSIDERATION 0 OF AUGUST 25 988 3. PZ 88-17 The meeting was called to Chairman, John Schwinger, PRESENT: Chairman Vice Chairman Secretary Members n Schwinger Mark Wood David Barfield Don Bowen Carole Flippo Ron Lueck James Brock Manny Tricoli C. A. Sanford George Tucker Wanda Calvert Member Economic Dev. Dir. Planning p & Z Coordinator Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the motion carried 6-0 with Ms. Flippo abstaining since she was not present at the meeting. Mr. Wood made a motion to move item #3 to the first on the agenda. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. Request of the City of North Richland Hills to rezone a portion of Tracts 2F and 2B, T. Akers Survey, Abstract 19, from their present classification of 1-2 Industrial to R-2 Single Family. This property is located north of Northeast Loop 820 and bounded on the west by Haltom City. Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. C. A. Sanford, Director of Economic Development for the City, came forward. He stated the city is initiating this zoning request, but the owners of the property, FSLIC, do not object. I Page 2 P & Z Minutes September 8, 1988 ( Ie I I I I I PZ 88-17 APPROVED I I 1. PZ 88-14 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Sanford stated this property is north of the freeway, bounded on the west by Haltom City and on the east by the new golf course property. Chairman Schwinger called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 88-17. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 7-0. Mr. Wood requested that he be allowed to step down for the next item. Request of North Richland Hills Baptist Church to rezone Lots A and G-2, Calloway Acres Addite n, 3 thru 17 and a portion of ot C, Parchman Addition, and cts 4Al and 4A2, A.G. Walker Surv ,Abstract 1630 from their present assifications of C-I Commercial, 7-MF Multi-Family and U Institu onal to U Institutio This property is located uth of Glenview Drive betwe Vance Road and Scruggs Drive, 40 Vance Road. Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mark Wood came forward to represent the church. He stated they want to consolidate all property the church owns into one zoning classification in anticipation of the upcoming plat. Mr. Wood stated they now have three different zonings on the property. Chairman Schwinger called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas August 25, 1988 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 88-17 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM 1-2 TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 110 Ye have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. s~\S.~~ d. ~.)\\kj~Ð SUSAN L. SCHWINGER, G.C.E. SLS/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic -Development Director Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning Zoning Review PZ 88-17 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .. ORDINANCE NO. 1573 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE i " WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-17 the following described property shall be rezoned from 1-2 to R-2. BEING a tract of land situated in the Telitha Akers Survey, Abstract 19, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being part of that certain tract conveyed to Ronald O. Campbell by deed recorded in Volume 7998, Page 526, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at an iron rod at the southeast corner of said Campbell tract; said point being in the westerly right-of-way line of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad (a 100-foot right-of-way); THENCE South 89 degrees 27 minutes 08 seconds West, along the south line of said Campbell tract, a distance of 988.23 feet to an iron rod at the point of beginning; THENCE South 89 degrees 27 minutes 08 seconds West, along said south line of lthe Campbell tract, a distance of 313.77 feet to an iron rod; THENCE North 00 degrees 34 minutes 05 seconds West, a distance of 2117.23 feet to a point for corner on the south right-oi-way line of Browning Boulevard (a 60-foot right-of-way); THENCE North 84 degrees 28 minutes 58 seconds East along said south right-of-way line of Browning Boulevard, a distance of 115.41 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 89 degrees 27 minutes 00 seconds East, along the south line of Browning Boulevard, a distance of 1075.71 feet to a point for corner; THENCE Southerly along the western boundary of the 100 year flood plain limits of Fossil Creek as follows: South 50 degrees 05 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 22.06 feet; South 31 degrees 01 minutes 20 seconds East, a distance of 92.13 feet; South 15 degrees 29 minutes 40 seconds East, a distance of 46.54 feet; South 02 degrees 11 minutes 44 seconds East, a distance of 133.88 feet; I Page 2 1_ South 04 degrees 05 minutes 27 seconds East, a distance of 262.33 I feet; ~ f '. South 05 degrees 06 minutes 33 seconds West, a distance of 151.03 feet; I South 44 degrees 59 minutes 36 seconds West, a distance of 96.48 feet; South 60 degrees 28 minutes 58 seconds West, a distance of 93.78 feet; South 78 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, a distance of 96.83 feet; I North 72 degrees 25 minutes 12 seconds West, a distance of 55.22 feet; North 89 degrees 25 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of 227.16 feet; Sout·h 61 degrees 49 minutes 46 seconds West, a distance of 224.98 I feet; North 84 degrees 42 minutes 05 seconds West, a distance of 97.12 feet; North 27 degrees 53 minutes 55 seconds West, a distance of 62.75"feet; I North 32 degrees 57 minutes 54 seconds Wes t , a distance of 119.30 feet; South 04 degrees 01 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of 53.84 feet; South 19 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds East, a distance of 79.05 feet; I South 43 degrees 41 minutes 46 seconds East, a distance of 56.01 feet; South 61 degrees 29 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance of 60.70 feet; South 12 degrees 18 minutes 45 seconds West, a distance of 119.94 I feet; South 26 degrees 37 minutes 10 seconds Wes t., a distance of 98.42 feet; South 21 degrees 00 minutes 50 seconds East, a distance of 78.91 feet; Ie South 16 degrees 28 minutes 06 seconds West, a distance of 398.63 feet; South 06 degrees 40 minutes 50 seconds East, a distance of 102.21 feet; I South 34 degrees 01 minutes 21 seconds East, a distance of 148.40 feet; South 02 degrees 08 minutes 54 seconds West, a distance of 105.24 I feet; ,South 16 degrees 13 minutes 01 seconds West, a distance of 94.48 feet; South 27 degrees 57 minutes .56 seconds West, a distance of 95.72 feet; South 26 degrees 35 mintues 21 seconds West, a distance of 35.68 feet I to the point of beginning and containing 35.3208 acres of land. This property is located north of Northeast Loop 820 and bounded on the I west by Haltom City. I APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. I ~~' CHA~LANNING ÁND z~.;;;;;; I ~ 1_ SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ..- Page 3 !'! t ~ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-88-17 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Economic Development Department: .Ubject: I 10/10/88 - Council Meeting Date: Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to PZ 88-16 Ordl.nance /11u80 (z.onl.ng Ordinance) Regä.LJ.iuõ Sigh5 Agenda Number: Ordinance No. 1572 I I I I An amendment to Ordinance 1080 to include Section XXX, Signs, is presented for City Council consideration. There have been numerous work sessions, public meetings and public hearings held over the past year concerning the proposed Ordinance. They are as follows: May 16, 1988 A Public Hearing was conducted by the City Council for the purpose of obtaining public input. August 11, 1988 A Work Session was conducted with Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission to incorporate changes resulting from the Council hearing. I August 25, 1988 A Public Hearing was conducted by the Planning and Zoning Commission. I September 9, 1988 Adoption of the proposed Ordinance by the Planning and Zoning Commission. I~The completed Section XXX is submitted by the Planning and Zoning Commission in form, ~content, intent, and spirit of the recommendations received from City Council as a result of the Public input. I I I RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Ordinance No. 1080 be amended to include Section XXX, Signs. The City Council should hold the required Public Hearing and act upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: BondS~G Rev.) ~ Operati Zet ~ Other . ./ t Department. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director ~I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I I. I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I ORDINANCE NO. 1572 BE IT ORDAINED by the City of North Rich1and Hils,' Texas, that Ordinance No 1080 (Zoning Ordinance), adopted January 9, 1984 and as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended at the following section: , . . I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I "1.. I SECTION xxx SIGNS 30. 1 PURPOSE The sign regulations as herein established have been made for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of North Richland Hills. The Ordinance contains standards regulating the use, size, location, construction and maintenance of signs. The intent of the regulations is to protect value within the City of North Richland Hills, to enhance the beauty of the City and to protect the general public from damage and injury which may be caused by the unregulated construction of signs. 30.2 DEFINITIONS 30.2.1 AREA OF SIGN "Area of Sign" shall mean the total area within the extreme perimeter of the attraction area intended to draw attention to the sign. The area of the sign with two (2) faces, approximately opposed, shall be that of the larger face if such condition prevails; but, if the angle between the planes of the opposing faces exceeds thirty (30) degrees the total area of both faces shall be considered the sign area. For multi-sided or circular signs, the calculation shall include all of the projected area. 30.2.2 BUILDING LINE "Building Line" shall be the setback lines as established by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills. 189 · I I I I I I I Ie I I 30.2.3 30.2.4 30.2.5 I I I I I Ie I 30.2.6 30.2.7 LIMITED ACCESS FREEWAY "Limited Access Freeway" shall be deemed to mean a highway to which the right of access to or from abutting lands is controlled and restricted by the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation or the City of North Richland Hills, further, a "Limited Access Freeway" shall be bordered on each side by access roads (or right of way for access roads). "Limited Access Freeways" within the City of North Richland Hills are Interstate Loop 820 and State Highway 121 (Airport Freeway) only. GROUND SIGN "Ground Sign" shall mean a sign not wholly supported on a building or which has its main supporting structure depending on the ground for attachment. PYLON SIGN "Pylon Sign" shall mean a ground sign erected for the purposes of identifying the tenants in a major development as defined by this Section. MONUMENT SIGN ''Monument Sign" shall mean a ground sign constructed out of brick, stone or cast concrete supported on concrete foundation. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT A "Major Development" shall mean a coordinated commercial development containing fifty thousand (50,000') square feet of building(s) area. 190 "~ . I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I . 30.2.8 PROJECTING SIGN "Projecting Sign" shall mean a sign suspended from a building or structure and projecting out therefrom more than one (1') foot. 30.2.9 ROOF SIGN "Roof Sign" shall mean any sign supported by the roof of building or placed above the apparent flat roof or eaves of a building as viewed from any elevation. 30.2.10 "Sign" shall mean a display board, screen, structure, object or part thereof, used to announce, declare, demonstrate, display or otherwise advertise and attract the attention of the public to any business, service or product provided on the premises upon which sign is placed, other than: (a) Official notices authorized by a court, public body or public officer, and, (b) Directional, warning or information signs authorized by federal, state or municipal authority. 30.2.11 TEMPORARY SIGN "Temporary Sign" shall mean a sign, balloon, flag, or other advertising display constructed of cloth, canvas, light fabric, cardboard, wall board or light material with or without frames intended to be displayed for a short period of time only. Trailer and portable signs are classified "temporary signs". 30.2.12 BANNER SIGN "Banner Sign" shall mean any sign painted on a strip of cloth, 191 · . I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 30.2.13 30.2.14 30.2.15 30.2.16 canvas or light fabric with or without frames intended to be displayed for a short period of time only. WALL SURFACE "Wall Surfacetf of a building shall mean the general outer surface not including cornices, bay windows, or other ornamental trim, of any main exterior wall of the bUilding. WALL SIGN "Wall Sign" shall mean any sign painted on, attached to or projecting from the wall surface of a building (including permanent window signs and signs on awnings and/or marquees). A wall sign shall not project above the apparent flat roof or eave line as viewed from all elevations, or more than one (1') foot from the surface of the wall. MARQUEE SIGN "Marquee Sign1l shall include any hood or awning or permanent construction projecting from the wall of a building or other structure containing either permanent or changeable advertising. DEVELOPMENT "Development", for the purposes of this section, shall mean any nonresidential property improvement or properties improved as a unit with a common parking area that is contiguous to the development. A shopping center under single or multiple ownership constitutes a development. A pad site within a shopping center under separate ownership constitutes a development. Any single lot, single structure on nonresidential property constitutes a development. 192 I " . I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 30.2.17 QUALIFIED STREET FRONTAGE "Qualified Street Frontage" shall mean the width of property along the street of a commercial or industrial development which bears the address of the property. 30.2.18 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN "Traffic Control Sign" shall be any sign used only to control and direct traffic on private property, e.g., "ENTER" or "EXIT". 30.2.19 ZONING DISTRICT "Zoning District" shall be the Districts as designated in this Ordinance. 30.2.20 SIGHT TRIANGLE "Sight Triangle", for the purposes of this section, shall be an area of unobstructed visibility on either corner of a street and/or driveway of at least twenty-five (25') feet in any direction. 30.3 SIGN PERMIT AND FEES 30.3.1 SIGN PERMIT REQUIRED (a) No person shall erect, alter, add to a sign or sign structure, except as provided in this Section and unless a permit for the same has been issued by the Building Permit Department. Where signs are illuminated by electric lighting requiring permanent wiring connections, a separate electrical permit shall be obtained as required by the Electrical Code of the City. (b) Temporary signs may be permitted to businesses possessing a current Certificate of Occupancy. 193 I " . I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I II I I I Ie I 30.3.2 OFFICIAL, QUASI-OFFICIAL AND DIRECTIONAL SIGNS (a) Nothing herein contained shall prevent the erection, construction and maintenance of official, traffic, fire and police signs, signals, devices and markings of the State, City or other appropriate governmental authorities, nor the posting of notices required by law. Private and quasi-public signs shall be prohibited upon public property unless authorized by the City or other appropriate governmental authority. (b) Legal notices, telephone and other underground utility warning signs not exceeding one (1') square foot in size and other safety signs may be erected without a permit being issued. (c) Nonadvertising, directional or informational signs less than six (6') square feet in area may be used without a permit in zoning Districts R-7MF, 0-1, LR, C-I, C-2, OC, I-I, 1-2 and PD as designated in this Ordinance. 30.3.3 APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT Applications for sign permits shall be to the Building Inspection Office for each development on which the sign or signs are to be erected and shall contain or have attached thereto the following information: (a) Name, address and telephone number of the applicant. (b) Location of building, structure or lot to which or upon which the sign or advertising structure is to be attached or erected. (c) Position of the sign or advertising structure in relation to nearby buildings or structures. 194 I " . I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I II I I I Ie I (d) Two (2) blueprints or ink drawings of the plans and specifications and method of construction and attachment to the buildings or in the ground. (e) Copy of stress sheets and calculations showing the structures are designed for deadload and wind pressure in any direction in the amount required by the Codes and Ordinances of the City. The Building Code of the City, which is the current edition of the Uniform Building Code, shall apply for design of any sign structure. All structural calculations and design drawings are to be by a professional engineer registered by the State of Texas. (f) Name of person, firm, corporation or association erecting structure or painting of sign. (g) Any electrical permit required and issued for such sign. (h) Detailed plans of all existing signs, including photos and/or other pertinent data which will aid in the determination to the site's conformance with this Ordinance. (i) Such other information as the Building Official shall require to show full compliance with this and all other Codes and Ordinances of the City. (j) In addition to the filing fee, a sign permit fee shall be collected in accordance with the schedule contained in Section 30.3.8. 30.3.4 NONCONFORMING SIGNS (a) The lawful use of any sign at the time this Ordinance was adopted may be continued for a period of five (5) years, after which any 195 I " . I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I sign not in compliance with this Ordinance shall be considered non-conforming. (b) Except as this Ordinance may otherwise require, any nonconforming sign use may be continued in operation on the same land and/or on the same structure which was in use on the effective date of these regulations or on the effective date of any amendment by which the use became nonconforming, but such sign area and/or structure shall not be changed. (c) No new permit may be issued for a sign which does not conform to the provisions of this section. 30.3.5 APPROVAL OF TRAFFIC ENGINEER If, in the opinion of the Building Official, the plans and specifications indicate that the sign or sign structure might interfere with, mislead, or confuse traffic, and if a ground sign is to be placed on a corner lot and in the opinion of the Building Official, could create a potential hazard to traffic, the applicant shall be required to submit a certification from a qualified Traffic Engineer that the sign location and structure will not constitute a hazard. 30.3.6 ISSUANCE OF PERMITS If it shall appear that the proposed sign structure is in compliance with all the requirements of this Section and all other Codes and Ordinances of the City and has received approval where necessary, the Building Department shall then issue the 196 I .. . I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I sign permit. If the work authorized under the permit is not prosecuted and has not been completed within one hundred eighty (180) days or a proper extension granted thereto after the date of issuance the said permit shall become null and void. Issuance of a sign permit shall be conditioned upon the applicant's acceptance of any conditions imposed thereon by the City. 30.3.7 UNSAFE AND UNLAWFUL SIGNS (a) Signs and sign structures including those existing prior to this Section shall be maintained at all times in a state of good repair, safe and secure with all braces, bolts, slips, supporting frame and fastenings free from deterio~ation, termite infestation, rot, rust or loosening, able to withstand at all time the wind pressure for which they were originally designed. (b) No person maintaining any sign, sign structure or billboard shall fail to keep the ground space within eight (8') feet of the base of the sign, signboard, billboard, or advertising structure free and clear of weeds, rubbish and other flammable waste materials. 30.3.8 FILING AND PERMIT FEES (a) Permanent Signs: Sign permit fees for permanent signs shall be based on square footage of the sign in accordance with the following: SQUARE FOOTAGE FEE 1 to 50 50 to 100 100 to 200 200 to 300 301 and above $ 50.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 197 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I II I I I Ie I (b) Temporary Signs: A single filing/permit fee of $25.00 shall be charged for each application for temporary signs. 30.4 AREA OF SIGNS PERMITTED 30.4.1 SIGNS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL (a) For signing purposes, frontage on private streets that serve as a public thoroughfare and not just as driveway may be considered as qualified street frontage. (b) Anyone (1) development may have one sign which may be a choice of, a ground sign, Monumment sign, roof sign or projecting sign, subject to the requirements of Sections 30.4.2 through 30.4.8. (c) Major Developments, containing fifty thousand (50,000') square feet or greater in building(s), may have one Pylon Sign located on one street frontage. The total amount of signage allowed on a Pylon Sign shall be calculated at (0.005) square feet of signage for each square foot of floor area up to a maximum of one thousand (1,000') square feet of sign area. Signage for such major development may reach a maximum height of seventy-five (75') feet if the sign is located on a Controlled Access Freeway frontage. For all other frontages of such development the sign may reach a maximum of fifty (50') foot in height and shall meet the general provisions of this Section. (d) In Developments with substantial street frontages; i.e., three hundred fifty (350') linear feet or greater, on two or more 198 I I. I streets, additional ground signs may be permitted for each street providing that all signs requested must meet the provisions of Section 30.4.2. 30.4.2 GROUND SIGNS Ground signs are subject to the following provisions: (a) One (1) ground or pole sign may be permitted for each three hundred (300') linear feet or portion thereof of qualified street frontage with each development in all zoning districts except AG and all "R" Districts. (b) The total area of sign permitted for a ground sign shall be calculated as one (1') square foot of eign for each linear foot of street frontage, up to a maximum of three hundred (300') square feet for anyone sign. (c) The maximum height of any ground sign and supporting structure shall be twenty-five (25') feet, except that the height of a ground sign may be increased by adding one (1') foot of height for each linear foot the sign is set back from the adjacent property lines, not to exceed an absolute maximum of fifty (50') feet to the top of the sign; except as noted in Section 30.4.1. (d) The height of any ground sign may not exceed one-half (1/2) the shortest linear distance from the location of the sign to the nearest boundary of any AG or "R" Zoning District. I I I I I I Ie I I I il I I I Ie I 199 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (e) The sign shall not project over the property line of the development, right-of-way or over any area within ten (10') feet of the curb of a public street. (f) A minimum qualified frontage of fifty (50') feet shall be required to erect a ground sign. (g) Permanent attachment to the ground shall be required for all ground signs, to meet or exceed the requirements of Section 30.3.3 paragraph (e). 30.4.3 MONUMENT SIGNS Monument Signs are subject to the following provisions: (a) One (1) monument sign may be permitted with each development in all zoning districts with exceptions as specified in 30.4.3(b). (b) Monument signs in "R" districts are limited to main entrances to "R" subdivisions and/or subject to approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission at Final Plat submission. Monument signs are not permitted in flAG" districts. (c) Monument signs in all zoning districts with exception of "R" districts shall not exceed six (6') feet in height and shall not exceed one hundred fifty (150') square feet in sign area. (d) Monument signs in "R" districts shall not exceed four (4') feet in height and shall not exceed fifty (50') square feet in sign area. 30.4.4 BANNER SIGNS Banner Signs are subject to the following provisions: (a) One (1) Banner Sign may be permitted with each development 200 I I . I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I without a sign permit in all zoning districts except AG and the R-I, R-2, R-3, R-6T, and R-B Districts. (b) The total permitted area for banner signs shall not exceed a maximum of fifty (50') square feet. (c) Banner Signs may be attached to a wall surface or facia and shall not project above the apparent roof or eave line. (d) Banner Signs shall be attached in such a manner to withstand wind loads. (e) Banner Signs which have become torn, tattered or unsightly, shall be removed. 30.4.5 FREEWAY SIGNS On properties fronting on the Limited Access Freeways as defined in Section 30.2 the following additional provisions shall apply to Ground Signs erected. (a) The maximum height allowed for a Ground Sign located within two hundred (200') feet of a limited access Freeway shall be fifty (50') feet as measured from the location of the sign or thirty-five (35') feet above the height of the adjacent main travel lane of the Freeway, whichever is greater. (b) The maximum size of the Ground Sign which is located within two hundred (200') feet of the Freeway shall be two (2') square feet of sign area for each linear foot of Freeway frontage up to a maximum of four hundred (400') square feet. 30.4.6 GROUND SIGNS FOR AUTO DEALERSHIPS Ground Signs erected for the purpose of advertising Automobile 201 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Dealerships are subject to the following additional provisions: (a) One (1) ground or pole sign may be permitted for each distinct Dealership for each one hundred fifty (150') linear feet or portion thereof of qualified street frontage with each development. (b) The total area of sign permitted for a ground sign shall be calculated as one (1') square foot of sign for each linear foot of street frontage, up to a maximum of three hundred (300') square feet for anyone sign. (c) A minimum qualified frontage of fifty (50') feet shall be required to erect a ground sign. 30.4.7 ROOF SIGNS Roof Signs are permitted under the following provisions: (a) One (1) roof sign may be permitted with each development on all zoning districts except AG and the "R" Districts. (b) Roof signs shall not project horizontally over the edge of the roof or eave. (c) The maximum permitted area of roof signage shall be one (1') square foot of sign area for each linear foot of qualified frontage not to exceed a maximum of two hundred (200') square feet. (d) The height of a roof sign shall not exceed ten (10') feet above the apparent flat roof or eave line. (e) Roof sign supports should be architecturally attractive or screened from view. 202 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 30.4.8 30.4.9 (a) 30.4.10 (a) (a) PROJECTING SIGNS Projecting Signs permitted are subject to the following provisions: One (1) projecting sign may be permitted with each development in all zoning districts except AG and the uR" Districts. Projecting signs shall not project over the property line of the development, right-of-way, or over any area within ten (10') feet of the curb of a public street. A projecting sign shall not extend more than four (4') feet from any wall facing. The total permitted area of a projecting sign shall be measured as one (1') square foot of sign area for each ~inear foot of qualified frontage not to exceed a maximum of one hundred (100') square feet. THEATER MARQUEES The maximum permitted area of a Theater Marquee shall be one (I') square foot of sign area for each linear foot of qualified frontage not to exceed three hundred (300') square feet of sign (b) (c) (d) area. WALL SIGNS COMMERCIAL ZONES Wall Signs shall be permitted in Commercial or Industrial Zoning district developments provided the total area of all wall signs on anyone (1) wall of a building shall not exceed twenty-five (25%) percent of the total wall area. 203 I I. I (b) Application of the area requirements shall include any valance or permanent window signs. (c) A wall sign shall not project above the apparent flat roof or eave line. (d) In Service Station/Convenience Store uses when a canopy is provided over the pump area, wall signs located on the facia area of the canopy, or suspended on the supports of the canopy, may be permitted provided that the total area of all signs does not exceed twenty-five (25%) percent of the total facia area of the I I I I I canopy. I 30.4.11 SIGNS: RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL ZONES All signs are prohibited in AG and All uR" Districts except as follows: (a) Multi-family developments in R-7MF and R-6T Zoning Districts shall be allowed wall or ground signs for identification purposes only for each street frontage. The total area of such signs shall not exceed fifty (50') square feet. (b) Ground signs allowed in these Districts shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet above grade. (c) Ground signs installed in these Districts shall not be located in the required sight triangle of a street or driveway inspection. (d) In "R" Distict developments providing solid masonry screening along street frontages, approved wall signs may be installed in such screening walls. Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 204 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (e) Wall signs may be used with any residential use in AG and all uR" Zoning Districts with the exception of R-7MF, with a maximum area of two (2') square feet per sign. No more than two (2) signs per occupancy. No permit is required for these signs. (f) In AG zoning districts, legitimate agricultural businesses or enterprises shall be permitted ground, roof, projecting or wall signs in accordance with the restrictions of Sections 30.4.2; 30.4.3; 30.4.6; 30.4.7.; and 30.4.9 with exception that such signs shall not exceed a total of one hundred (100') square feet and ground signs shall not exceed fifteen (15') feet in height. 30.4.12 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS (a) The maximum area of anyone traffic control sign shall be two (2') square feet. (b) Traffic control signs are not permitted in AG and all uR" Districts, with the exception of the R-7MF District. (c) Traffic control signs shall not include any advertising or attention attracting lighting, symbols, logos or shapes. (d) Traffic control signs may pertain to either vehicular or pedestrian traffic. 30.5 GENERAL PROVISIONS 30.5.1 INTERFERENCE WITH BUILDING REGULATIONS No sign shall be erected in such a manner that any portion of its surface or supports will interfere in any way with the free use of any fire escape, exit, standpipe, or windows or obstruct any required ventilator or door stairway. 205 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 30.5.2 (a) 30.5.3 (a) 30.5.4 (a) 30.5.5 (a) ENCROACHMENT PERMIT No sign permit shall be issued for any sign which encroaches upon or over any City-owned or controlled property unless an encroachment permit therefor is obtained from the City Councilor State Agency responsible for such property. PROJECTION OVER PRIVATE PROPERTY No sign may project more than six (6") inches from the face of a building over private property used or intended to be used by the general public, unless there is a minimum of eight (8') feet clearance provided from the bottom of the sign to sidewalk or grade immediately below the sign, or a. minimum of fourteen (14') feet clearance from the bottom of the sign to a vehicular trafficway immediately below the sign. MEMORIAL SIGNS AND HISTORICAL TABLETS Nothing herein contained shall prevent the City Council from granting special permits on such terms as it may deem proper, for signs denoting properties or buildings which may have historical or memorial significance to the community. Nor shall the City Council be restricted from authorizing signs as they may deem appropriate to advertise patriotic, special events or special projects of general public interest taking place within the boundaries of the City. VEHICLE ADVERTISING The intent of this Section is to create equal and just vehicle advertising. Vehicles may display signage in accordance with Texas Motor Safety Laws with the following additional guidelines. 206 .. . . . I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (b) Signs must be permanently attached to vehicles by either being painted, bolted, screwed or magnetically fixed. (c) Cloth or other light materials secured with rubber, rope, string, tape, or other similar adhesives shall not be permitted. (d) No sign or advertising shall be erected or attached to any vehicle except for those signs which are painted directly or mounted flush to the surface or mounted directly on the °roof of the vehicle. (e) No roof mounted signs shall project more than twelve (12") inches above the roof of the vehicle. (f) All vehicles which have signs or advertising shall be in working order and shall be in compliance with all applicable vehicle safety laws when signs are in place. All such vehicles shall have current registration and inspection stickers and shall be regularly used for transportation purposes. 30.5.6 LIGHTING (a) Signs may be illuminated or non-illuminated. Illumination may be either by internal, internal-indirect or indirect lighting as defined below. Lighting shall be so installed as to avoid any glare or reflection into adjacent property, or onto a street or alley to create a traffic hazard. (b) When not necessary to satisfy security purposes, it is suggested that lighting be turned off as soon after business hours as is reasonable, especially where signs are in close proximity to residential areas. 207 I ' . I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (c) "Internal lighting" shall mean a source of illumination entirely within the sign which makes the contents of the sign visible at night by means of the light being transmitted through a translucent material but wherein the source of the illumination is not visible. (d) "Internal-indirect lighting" shall mean a source of illumination entirely within the sign (generally a free-standing letter) which makes the sign visible at night by means of lighting the background upon which the free-standing character is mounted. The character itself shall be opaque, and thus will be silhouetted against the background. The source of the illumination shall not be visible. (e) "Indirect lighting" shall mean a source of external illumination located a distance away from the sign, which lights the sign, but which itself is not visible to persons viewing the sign from any normal position of view. 30.5.7 ROTATING, MOVING, FLASHING, CHANGING OR BLINKING, BILLBOARD SIGNS (a) Rotating, search lights, flashing, blinking, or billboard signs shall not be permitted. 30.5.8 MESSAGE SIGNS (a) Message signs containing changeable messages, i.e., Time and Temperature, etc, may be permitted on an individual basis by submittal of a request to the Building Official. 208 I I. I I I I I I I 1_ I I I I I I I I_ I . . 30.6 TEMPORARY SIGNS 30.6.1 EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS SECTION: (a) No person may erect a temporary sign as defined in Section 30.2.10 without a permit from the Building Inspection Department. (b) No temporary or portable sign shall be erected or placed to advertise a business, industry or pursuit except on the premises on which the referenced business, industry or pursuit is conducted. (c) All temporary type fragile displays or signage that might separate from itself or become separated from either line under the guidelines of the 1988 Uniform Building Code, Section 23-4, Figure 4, Page 137 shall not be allowed. These restrictions are to protect the general public from flying debris generated by dismembered displays. (d) No temporary or portable sign shall be attached to any utility pole, light pole, or traffic control sign or pole, (e) The complete sign package must be removed at termination of the permit. Removal of letters from the sign board does not abate a non-permitted sign. (f) No temporary sign shall be displayed for more than thirty (30) days per permit received. (g) A maximum of thre·e (3) temporary sign permits per year shall be issued to anyone business, industry, or pursuit. However consecutive permitting is not allowed. (h) Temporary signs shall not exceed fifty (50') square feet in area. 209 · ' '. . I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I II I I I I Ie I (i) No temporary or portable sign shall be erected or placed within fifteen (15') feet of the curb or street except for those which may be mounted on the wall of a building which is closer than fifteen (15') feet to the curb or street. (j) No temporary or portable sign may be erected or placed in any location that constitutes a safety or traffic hazard. (k) No temporary or portable sign may be erected or placed in a fire zone, fire lane, handicap parking area or required loading zone. (1) No temporary or portable sign may be placed in any location that blocks view from any permitted permanent signage. (m) Temporary or portable signs shall be place at least one hundred (100')feet apart. (n) Non-conforming temporary signs or temporary signs without permits may be impounded by the City forty-eight (48) hours after notice is given to the owner or party responsible for the sign. (0) Each temporary sign may advertise one or more individual businesses. However, for each business advertised a separate permit fee will be required and each business will be charged for the advertisement against its allotted three (3) permits per year as stated in Subsection (g). (p) Trailer and portable signs shall bear in letters of not less than one (1) inch in height the company name of the sign owner and telephone number on each unit. This information must be current. 210 , ' I I. I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I Any sign not containing current information shall be classified as non-conforming signs and may be impounded by the City forty-eight (48) hours after notice is given to the owner or party responsible for the sign. 30.6.2 REAL ESTATE SIGNS Permits shall not be required for the following types of real estate signs: (a) One (1) temporary sign announcing the offering for sale or rental of individually platted residential or commercial property on which it is placed shall be allowed in any District and may be placed in any yard. Such sign shall not exceed five (5') square feet in area. Such sign shall be removed within one (1) week following the close of a sale or lease. (b) On nonresidential commercial property where there is a business building, one (1) temporary unlighted sign offering all or a portion of the same sale or rental shall be allowed flat against any wall of the business building. Such sign shall be no taller than the wall and shall have an area no larger than one hundred (100') square feet. Such sign shall be removed within one (1) week following the close of a sale or lease. (c) On undeveloped property, temporary unlighted signs offering the same for sale or lease shall be allowed. Such signs shall be located at least twenty-five (25') feet behind any curb or ten (10') feet behind any property line, whichever is greater; and 211 ¡ . I I. I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I shall not exceed fifteen (15') feet in height. The total area of all sign message surfaces of all such signs shall not exceed one (1') square foot per one (1') linear foot of street frontage of the property for sale or one hundred (100') square feet on each street fronting the property; whichever is smaller. Only one (1) sign per street frontage shall be permitted. Each sign shall be removed within one (1) week following the close of the sale or lease. 30.6.3 WEEKEND BUILDERS ADVERTISING The City of North Richland Hills's policy for weekend advertising, as expressed in this Ordinance is extended to homebuilders for the purpose of guiding the weekend motoring public to available residential properties in North Richland Hills. The policy is intended as a benefit also to the buying public. These provisions are designed to allow temporary directional signs without resulting in an excess that may prove offensive to others of the public. The policy should also serve as "connnon sense" guidelines in places where direct application is unclear. (a) Registration: In order for a bUilder/developer to be eligible to participate in this weekend advertisement he must be registered with the Building Inspection Office. An annual fee of $50.00 must be paid by each builder/developer wishing to advertise his homes for sale under these provisions. Such annual fee must be paid and/or renewed during the month of January of each year. 212 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (b) Schedule: Signs will be allowed between 12 PM Friday and 12 PM Monday. A holiday falling on Friday or Monday will be considered part of the weekend. (c) Sign Size: Signs shall not exceed twenty-four (24") inches by thirty (30") inches in size, not to exceed three (3') feet above grade. (d) Spacing of Signs: A minimum of thirty (30') feet must be held between all signs, and signs for one advertiser must be at least two hundred (200') feet apart. (e) Sign Location: Individual sign locations shall adhere to the following criteria. (1) No closer than forty (40') feet to a street intersection or median opening. (2) Signs may be placed in City right of way, but no closer than three (3') feet from the edge of the sign to the street curb or edge of pavement. Signs should not encroach either the sidewalks or the street. (3) No sign shall be placed in a "visibility triangle" as defined in this section. Generally, if a sign is close to blocking motorist visibility, it should be removed. (4) No signs should be placed further than three (3) miles from the subject property. (f) Sign Construction and Criteria: Signs should be rigid, two (2) dimensional displays that advertise new residential property, "For Sale" only, (not lease property), guiding the motorists to a specific location in North Richland Hills. 213 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I These are the guidelines under which this policy will be administered, relating particularly to the weekend/motoring/home-buying customer. It is the responsibility of the builder to secure permission of the adjacent property owner for placement of the signs on private property. This policy does not grant unlimited access and use of the City right-of-way. Violations of this policy will be cause for confiscation of the signs. Any signs which are confiscated by the Code Enforcement Officer may be reclaimed by the owner of such sign, but each sign so confiscated will be subject to a redemption fee of $5.00 per sign. If signs remain unreclaimed for a period of thirty (30) days, the City will dispose of such signs as may be appropriate. Excessive general violations may require that the 'policy be suspended for a period of time. The Building Official shall notify the Ci ty Council in the event that the suspension of this policy is put into effect indicating the causes and the period of the suspension. All builders are offered the use of these provisions equally. In so doing, the City asks that the builders aid in maintaining a neat and orderly appearance throughout all of North Richland Hills. 30.6.4 SUBDIVISION/NEW DEVELOPMENT SIGNS (a) Subdivision/New Development Signs are to be used for the identification of a new project, such as a subdivision, where real property is being sold for the first time to a user, new buildings, public projects and the like. These signs are not permanent but may be required for a longer period of time than most temporary signs. 214 I I. I (b) Each subdivision and/or development shall be permitted to install one on-site sign located on the property owned by the advertiser in the same zoning district as the project and one off-site sign which may be located in' any Commercial, Industrial, or Office District or on unplatted vacant property. (c) A sign permit is required for each subdivision or new development sign erected in accordance with these provisions. (d) Permits for such signs shall be issued for a period of one (1) year or to completion of the project, whichever occurs first. A second permit allowing an additional of one (1) year may be granted by the Building Official upon payment of a renewal fee equal to the original permit fee and conformance with the following requirements: (1) A substantial portion of the development is not yet completed. (2) If the development has building activity in progress, (3) If the sign is relocated to a portion of the development which is not offensive to the completed portion of the development. (e) These signs shall not exceed fifteen (15') feet in height and shall be no larger than one hundred fifty (150') square feet in I I I I I I Ie I I II I I I I Ie I size. (f) Such signs shall be located at least twenty-five (25') feet behind the curb of the street and shall not be in violation of any visibility triangle. 215 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I ,I I I I I I Ie I (g) On larger vacant tracts where more than one project or development may be advertised, no two signs may be closer than two hundred (200') feet apart. TRADE CONSTRUCTION SIGNS 30.6.5 (a) Trade Construction signs may be approved at the discretion of the Building Official to advertise the various construction trades on any construction site. (b) Trade construction signs must be removed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 30.6.6 POLITICAL SIGNS (a) Temporary, unlighted, political signs ·(including portable or trailer signs) supporting an announced candidate, a party or an issue shall be allowed in any district without a sign permit. (b) Political signs shall not be located on any utility, light, traffic signal or sign pole. (c) Political signs are permitted for a period of thirty (30) days prior to local or county elections, sixty (60) days prior to a state election and ninety (90) days prior to a national election. All political signs shall be removed no later than seven (7) days after the election or after the termination of candidacy, whichever occurs first. (d) In AG and all "R" zoning districts, political signs shall not have a height of more than three (3') feet above grade. In other districts, the height shall not exceed six (6') feet above grade. 216 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 30.6.7 (a) 30.6.8 (a) (e) In AG and all "R" districts, political signs shall not exceed five (5') square feet. In all zoning districts, political signs shall not be located to cause a safety or traffic hazard. (f) CIVIC AND RELIGIOUS SIGNS (b) Temporary signs advertising public school, religious events of public schools and religious organizations may be erected or placed on their property after obtaining a permit from the Building Department. Such permit will be at no cost. A maximum of two permits may be issued at anyone time. Temporary signs advertising public school, civic or religious events of public school, civic or religious organizations may be placed on any private property with the permission of the owner. Such off-site signs are required to be permitted. Signs announcing civic or religious events of wide-spread community interest may be erected on public property or right- of-way with special permission of the City Council. Such signs will be permitted by the Building Department at no cost. Such signs shall be located so as not to present a safety or traffic hazard. (c) GARAGE SALE SIGNS Temporary, unligh.ted signs announcing the holding of a sale of household possessions at a place of residence shall be allowed in any zoning district without permit. 217 I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I Ie I (b) Garage 'sale signs shall be located on private property only. Garage sale signs shall not be permitted on any public property or right-of-way, nor on any utility, light, traffic signal or sign pole. (c) Sign size shall not exceed six (6') square feet. (d) Signs shall not be posted more than five (5) days prior to the beginning of the sale and shall be removed within twenty-four (24) hours following the end of the sale. 30.7 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 30.7.1 The construction of all signs shall comply with the structural requirements of the City Building Code and the current edition of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City. Structural design shall be by professional engineer registered by the State of Texas. 30.7.2 The design of sign supports and structure shall be compatible with and in harmony with the surrounding buildings and structures. 30.8 OBNOXIOUS SIGNS EXPLOITING SEX PROHIBITED 30.8.1 VISUAL DEPICTION OF SEXUAL AREAS OF HUMAN FORM PROHIBITED. (a) No sign or signs as defined in this Ordinance, to include any temporary sign, which in whole or in part, depicts the human form in such a manner that the areas of the buttocks, or the genitals, or the pubic area, or any portions of the female breast below the top of the nipple, are depicted as not covered with opaque 218 ( . I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 30.8.2 (a) 30.8.3 (a) 30.8.4 (a) clothing shall be maintained, erected, or placed upon or adjacent to the outside of any building where it is visible from public streets or from adjacent buildings or premises. USE OF THE WORDS CONNOTING EROTIC ENTERTAINMENT PROHIBITED. (b) No sign or signs, as defined in this Ordinance, including any temporary signs, which in whole or part advertise any "topless", "bottomless", "naked", or words of like import, except that the words "adult entertainment" or "adult shows" will be permissible, shall be maintained, erected, or placed upon or adjacent to the outside of any building where it is visible from public streets or from adjacent buildings or premises. DISPLAY OF OFFENSIVE SIGNS A PUBLIC NUISANCE. Any sign which is in violation of Sections 30.8.1 or 30.8.2 is declared a public nuisance. ABATEMENT Any temporary sign or signs in violation of Section XXX shall be abated within twenty-four (24) hours after notice has been given in writing to abate the sign or signs. Any sign which involves letters placed on a marquee is considered a temporary sign for purposes of this Section. Any sign or signs in violation of Section XXX which can be covered or painted over in such a manner so the sign will comply with this Section and which do not require removal or mechanical or electrical alterations, the whole or part of the sign shall be 219 I I. I I I I I I 30.8.5 (a) I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 30.8.6 (a) (c) covered or painted within twenty-four (24) hours after written notice has been given in writing to abate the sign or signs. Signs in violation of Section XXX which require mechanical or electrical alteration of all or part of the sign or require the removal of part or all of the sign in order to comply with this Section shall be altered or removed within'seven (7) days after service of written notice to abate the sign or signs. NOTICE TO ABATE The City Manager or the Building Official or one of their designees are authorized to prepare and deliver notice to abate any sign or signs in violation of Section XXX. Notice is deemed to be served for the purpose of Section XXX if delivered to any person who is an owner or lessee of the premises on which the sign or signs are located or to any officer of any corporation or any partner of a partnership which is operating a business on the premises on which the sign or signs are located which violates Section XXX and which is responsible for the sign or signs in violation of this Section. VIOLATION A MISDEMEANOR (b) Any person, firm, or corporation which is found to be in violation of the provisions of Section XXX shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction may be punished by fine of not less than ($50) dollars nor more than one thousand ($1000) dollars, and each day such violation occurs shall be deemed a separate offense. 220 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 30.9 ADMINISTRATION The Building Official shall administer Section XXX of this Ordinance. 30.10 ENFORCEMENT 30.10.1 (a) (b) ENFORCEMENT If the Building Official or other person he/she may appoint shall find that any sign or other advertising structure regulated herein is unsafe or insecure, or is a menace to the public, or has been constructed or erected or is being maintained in violation of the approved sign permit or provisions of this Section, the permittee or owner thereof shall be given written notice of the violation. If the permittee or owner fails to remove or alter the structure so as to comply with the standards herein set forth within ten (10) days after such notice, such sign or advertising structure may be removed or altered to comply by the City of North Richland Hills at the expense of the permittee and/or owner of the property upon which it is located. The Building Official shall refuse to issue any subsequent building, electrical, plumbing or mechanical permits for the property on which the offending sign was located if any owner or permittee shall refuse to pay the costs so assessed. The Building Official may cause any sign or other advertising structure which is in immediate peril to persons or property to (c) (d) 221 I' , I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I be removed; by giving notice to the owner or permittee at least forty-eight (48) hours in advance. (e) The Building Official or other person he/she may appoint may cause any illegal temporary sign, to be removed within twenty-four (24) hours. 30.10.2 RIGHT OF ENTRY (a) Upon presentation of proper credentials, the Building Official or his duly authorized representative may enter at reasonable times, any buildings, structures or premises in the City to perform any duties imposed upon him by Section XXX. 30.11 ABATEMENT OF NONCONFORMING SIGNS 30.11.1 TIME PERIOD A period of ten (10) years subsequent to the effective date of this Ordinance is hereby established for the abatement of signs legally existing prior to the said date but such signs which have become nonconforming under the terms of this Section or previous Ordinances adopted since the effective date noted. Nothing contained within this provision shall apply to signs illegally erected. Such illegally erected signs are subject to immediate abatement. 30.11.2 WALL SIGNS Nonconforming painted wall signs are subject, in addition to the abatement procedures set forth, to immediate abatement when the business occupying the premises changes to a different business or different owner necessitating repainting of the said sign. 222 '. . I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 30.11.3 APPEAL Abatement periods established herein are subject to appeal before the Zoning Board of Adjustment. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th OF Sept ember ~ 1988 r-.:;:;;--,ea DAY , ~ Commission ~-/.\::f\~ ~ Secretary Planning arid ZOrling·- ommission PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1988. ATTEST: Mayor Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney 223 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Economic Development 10/10/88 Council Meeting Date: Request of Several Homeowners to Replat Several PS 88-7 LOLS on che Sout:h S1-de of labor 51:reet. LuL::) 10R.-llR, Agen~a Number: Block 9, Lots lR-9R, Block 6, Haltom Ranchland Additioñ, ' and Lots 3R-5R, and 7R, Block 4, Diamond Loch North Addition. I I Subject: I I This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lots lOR and llR, Block 9, Lots lR through 9R, Block 6, Haltom Ranchland Addition, and Lots 3R through 5R and 7R, Block 4, Diamond Loch North Addition. The subject property is a series of existing residential lots located on the south side of Tabor Street between Rufe Snow Drive and Diamond Loch Drive. I The purpose for the proposed replat is to combine the existing lots along Tabor Street with the unplatted property to the rear of the lots which is owned by the applicants respectively. Several times in the recent past one of the property owners has proposed to make use of the unplatted portion of his property to construct a garage, storage building, and etc. In each case the Staff had to inform the applicant that the property -must be platted in order for permits to be issued. In an effort to resolve this issue finally for all the involved parties, the City Council agreed that if a cooperative platting could be submitted by all the affected property owners the filing fees for the plat application would be waived. The plat under consideration covers all of the remaining lots in the two block area with the exception of one vacant lot, the two individual lots which have been previously platted, and the lots which have frontage on Rufe ~now Drive where the owner chose not to participate in this platting. I I I I e All of the Staff comments have been satisfactorily answered. I I RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Plat Application PS 88-7 requesting replat of Lots lOR and llR, Block 9, Lots lR through 9R, Block 6, Haltom Ranchland Addition, and Lots 3R through 5R and 7R, Block 4, Diamond Loch North Addition as submitted. The Commission and the Staff recommend the approval of the Replat Request by the City Council. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Bud et I e Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~t~ , Finance Director nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I Ie I (' ~v ~\-t> 1- 2 ,'v ~ F7n-aTy-aTn 11 a ....... ,..' I Page 2 P & Z Minutes June 23, 1988 ( ( I_ I I I Chairman Tucker said there concerns regarding the set the cuI de sac lots, but said this could be checked ou efore approval of the final PS 88-6 APPROVED PHASE I ield made the motion to rove Phase I of the preliminary plat and hold the approval of the other phases until the decision is made on the golf course. He said the balance of this plat would need to come back before this Commission for approval. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0. I I I 2. PS 88-7 Request of several homeowners to replat several lots on Tabor Street. The lots are: Lots 10R-IIR, Block 9, Lots IR-9R, Block 6, Haltom Ranchland Addition, and Lots 3R-5R, & 7R, Block 4, Diamond Loch North Addition. I 1_ I I I I I Chairman Tucker stated this replat was initiated by the City Council. He said the Council waived the City Fees for this group of homeowners to get together and plat the vacant lots behind their houses. Chairman Tucker opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Pete Delgado, 6632 Tabor, came forward. He asked what effect would the easement have running across the middle of their lots. I I I_ I Mr. Royston said you could not build on it. Mr. Delgado asked what if a tornado came through. Mr. Royston said the utility easement would remain the same; it runs through the property now. I Page 3 P & Z Minutes June 23, 1988 ( ( Ie I I I I I I ,.. Mr. Delgado said he does not object to the plat, he just wanted to bring out about the utility easement. Chairman Tucker called for those wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PS 88-7 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 88-7. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 7-0. I Ie ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:40 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission I I I I I I I Ie I Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission 1 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( ESTABLISHED 1880 GAREY W. GILLEY DON W. HICKEY C. RICHARD DAVIS. JR. STEPHEN H. ROBERSON BROOKES BAKER SURVEYORS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION TITLE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING BROOKES BAKER BUILDING - 511 E. BLUFF STREET 817 - 335 -7151 METRO 429-6119 FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76102-2293 ~ June 16, 1988 Ms. Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Commission 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: PS-88-7 Dear Ms. Calvert: BROOKES BAKER (1902-1955) JOHN F. BAKER (1902-1985) S. J. BAKER. CONSULTANT FRED M. MORRIS. CONSULTANT I have reviewed comments from Kevin B. Miller, P.E. dated June 13, 1988 and offer the following: 1. Drainage easement added. 2. We will acquire volume and page numbers on newly recorded deeds from county when they have are available. They will be complete prior to final recording. 3. Acreage has been added. 4. Signature block has been added. 5. Vicinity map added. 6. "Final Plat" has been added. 7. Existing easements and "Beginning" points added. Additional prints are included for the Commission's review. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, BROOKES BAKER SURVEYORS ~ #f2 Stephen H. Roberson SHR:bam enclosure, as stated I Ie I I I I I I . I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( City of Xrth Richland Hills, Texas 1'! June 13, 1988 REF: PWM-0050-88 Memo to: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Director of Public Works Subject: PS 88-7; Final Plat of DIAMOND LOCH NORTH - Block 4 and HALTOM RANCHLAND ADDITION - Blocks 6 & 9 I have reviewed the above referenced documents and offer the following comments. 1. Since E£ construction is planned at this time, a drainage study will not be requested at this time. The Drainage Master Plan indicates the need for future improvements to extend from Glenview Drive n~rth on Lariat Trail to Briley Drive. A fifteen feet drainage easement between Lot l-R, Block 6 and Lot ll-R, Block 9 of Haltom Ranchland Addition will be required to accommodate future drainage appurtenances. 2. The Metes and Bounds description has 6 blanks where information is still required. These blanks have been circled on the attached print. 3. There are three separate descriptions which should all list the total acreage defined. 4. Add signature blocks as indicated to more clearly define which signatures are for which addition. 5. Add Vicinity Map as outlined in Subdivision Ordinance. 6. Add term "FINAL PLAT of" to title block as indicated. 7. Show existing easements and "Beginning" points as indicated. %~~~ Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Director of Public Works Ids cc: Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning Mr. Greg Dickens, 'Director of Public Works Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Asst. City Manager (817) 281.Q04117301 N.E. LOOP 8201P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76180 I I Department: &ubject: I I I I I I il Ie I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Economic Development 10/10/88 - Council Meeting Date: " Request of Immanuel Lutheran Church for Variance from PS 88-21 Subdivision Ordinance fur TCCH..:l A, Bludt 7, HulIJay Agenda Number: Heights Addition. . This variance request is presented on the Church property Tract A, Block 7, Holiday Heights Addition. The property is located at 7321 Lola Drive. The applicant is requesting that a variance be granted allowing the construction of a 4,500 square foot Educational Building without making improvements to Calloway Branch at this time. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission after reviewing the letter from Public Works, dated September 20, 1988, expressing no objection, recommended approval of granting a variance for this project only. The Council should act on the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budg e Other l Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available 9~~JA !iix~~ ent Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 ~ P & Z Minutes September 22, 1988 ( 2. PS 88-18 This was added to the motion. The motion carried 7-0. Request of Mildred Kid preliminary plat of t Kidwell Additio 1, PS 88-18 APPROVED e the motion to approve subject to the Engineer's ts. seconded by Mr. and the motion carried 7-0. 3. PS 88-19 Request of Mildred Kidwell for final plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Kidwell Addition. Mr. Barfield made the motion to table PS 88-19 until such time as the Engineer's comments are addressed. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0. 4. PS 88-21 Consideration of a variance request from Immanuel Lutheran Church on Tract A, Block 7, Holiday Heights Addition regarding Calloway Branch Creek. Mr. Bowen stated the Commission has a letter from the Assistant Director of Public Works which states they do not have any objection to the additional building at this time. PS 88-21 APPROVED Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 88-21 for this addition only; for this single project. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( City of JXðrth Richland Hills., Texas September 20, 1988 REF: P\~1-009l-88 Memo to: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities RE: PS 88-21; Channel Improvements for HOLIDAY HEIGHTS ADDITION - Tract A, Block 7 The above referenced site is located adjacent to a portion of Calloway Branch which is currently unimproved. The Five Year Capital Improvements Project Plan proposes to improve the channel south of this site sometime in the future. The portion of the channel immediately north of this site is not currently in the Five Year Plan. Due to the location of the site, the magnitude of the proposed on site construction and the condition of the existing channel, Public Works is not opposed to granting the owner a variance to the City Ordinances which would allow the owner to make no channel improvements at this time. Public Works would however retain the right to review any and all future requests for building permits. ~~6?~~ ~evin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Director Public Works/Utilities KBM/ds cc: Mr. Greg Dickens, Director of Public Works/Utilities Immanuel Lutheran Church (817) 281.Q04117301 N.E. lOOP 8201P.O. BOX 18809/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76180 I --- --- :::-- ~ == I I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~- Immanuel Luthtf an Church & School 7321 Lola Drive Fort Worth, TX 76118 Phone (817) 281-6195 Bible Class 9:30 A.M. Sunday Worship 10:30 A.M. Rev. M.F. Wagenknecht September 12, 1988 Zoning and Planning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 Attn: Mr. George Tucker Dear Mr. Tucker, By way of this letter, Immanuel Ev. Lutheran Church is hereby requesting a variance to the requirement of upgrading the Calloway Branch Creek drainage ravine located on our property. To require our congregation to absorb such cost would mean that our current build- ing project would be impossible as the improvement would be cost prohibitive. To assist you in your deliberations, please find attached the following: 1. A blueprint òf our initial site plan illustrat- ing elevations (exhibit A), and 2. A revised blueprint to meet the city fire codes (widening of the turnaround area) as well as moving of parking spaces to elude the flood plain. Correspondence may be made directly with me, or with Pastor Wagenknecht. May the Lord grant you wisdom in your deliberations. Yours in Christ, -:7-Ä..-f/rj:x /./ I~;~, /T?'~ V( /1 J Y I ..~ Thomas H. Miller Building Committee Chairman Immanuel Ev. Lutheran Church Home Phone 281-9574 or"","'~"<'" ' 1° CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: Public Works _ Council Meeting Date: 10/10 /RR .ubject: Amendment to Water Service Contract with the City of Agenda Number: GN 88-97 II Fort Worth - Ordinance No. 1568 I The attached proposed ordinance will amend the March 19, 1964 water service contract with the City of Fort Worth for the second time. The first amendment was passed by the Council on September 28, 1987 as Ordinance No. 1491. The intent of the first amendment was to set the wholesale water rates for a one year period during which a new wholesale water contract was to be negotiated by the Wholesale Water Customers with the City of Fort Worth. The renegotiations have not yet rendered an acceptable contract" so a second amendment is required to again set the wholesale water rates for another year. I I I The proposed rates in the attached ordinance reflect an approximate 11% increase over last year's rates. The alternative per the existing contract is for the City of Fort Worth to put up a level 5 year rate. An increase of approximately 16% would be required to achieve a 5 year set wholesale water rate with only pass-through raw water charge increases by the Tarrant County'Water Supply and Control District No.1 being necessary. I e Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 1568 adopting a second amendment to the City of Fort Worth's City Secretary Contract No. 4947 as described above. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget e Othe Finance Review Acct. Number N/ A Sufficient Funds Available d/¡4~ Head Signatur City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Fmance Director Paqe 1 of 1 I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I II I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1568 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: '~\ 1. The ~1ayor be, and is hereby, authorized to execute the attached document entitled "Second Amendment to City Secretary Contract No. 4947" as the act and deed of this City. PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day of October, 1988. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I SECOND AMENDMENT TO CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NO. 1568 This agreement entered into this 10th day of October between the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills. , 1988, by and WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills entered into a contract for water service dated March 19, 1964, same being City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No. 4947; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 1987, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills entered into an amendent of City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No. 4947, same being City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No. 16112; and WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills are desirous of amending said City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract Numbers 4947 and 16112; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 5, Section 38, of City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No. 16112 is hereby amended and, after having been so amended, shall read as follows: "b. Commodity Charge and Rates of Use Charge. "Except for fiscal year 1988-1989, the rate shall be reviewed and adjusted every three (3) years beginning in fiscal year 1989-1990. The cost related to the projection and transmission function of distributing treated water to the Fort Worth city limits in wholesale quantities plus a service -1- I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I charge shall be determined in accordance with the methods herein. Such costs shall be projected through the City of Fort Worth fiscal year 1991 to establish the fair rate for water to be charged during the period October 1, 1989, to September 30, 1992. The adjusted rate shall be made effective October 1, 1989. A similar review and rate adjustment shall be made for each succeeding three year period for the term of this contract. For the rates for the three (3) years beginning 1989-1990, the Touche Ross Study dated September, 1987, and computer model included therewith shall be used by Fort Worth to project the rates to be charged for said three (3) year period. The following rates are hereby established for the period October 1, 1988. to September 30, 1989: Volume Rates (Per 1000 gal.) Treatment, Pumping and Transmission Raw Water Total Volume Rate OUTSIDE DISTRICT $.3183 $.6191 $.9374 Maximum Day Rate (Per MGD in excess of average day) $62,974 Maximum Hour Rate (Per MGD in excess of maximum day) $29,450 Meter Charge ($/meter/month) $25 2. Every other term, condition and/or covenant contained in City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract Numbers 4947 and 16112 not amended hereby shall be unaffected hereby and shall continue in full force and effect. -2- I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I :1 I I I I Ie I ATTEST: Ci ty Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney Date: -3- CITY OF FORT WORTH By: Assistant City Manager By: ~.i "';;:::. ~-;"''0'"'-.~ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: -SUbject: I I I I Economic Development - Council Meeting Date: 10/10/88 Contract for Golf Course Engineering GN 88-98 Agenda Number: We have sent seven Requests for Proposals for Engineering Services on the Golf Course. These will be received at City Hall Friday afternoon and evaluated by a committee of six composed of the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and four Staff members. This group will have a recommendation of a firm ready for Council approval on Monday. RECOMMENDATION: Award contract to firm recommended by the Committee. I ¡e I Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) A Operating Budget . Other I ...~ t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM f3~Á~~ , Finance Director City Manager Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Economic Development Department: Subject: Contract for Golf Course Engineering 10/10/88 - Council Meeting Date: GN 88-98 Agenda Number: The Committee described in the original cover sheet for this item has evaluated the proposals submitted by seven engineering firms, which were pre-qualified as competent to accomplish the scope of work as defined. After the evaluation, a numerical ranking was assigned and it is as follows: 1. Rady and Associates 2. Freese and Nichols 3. Albert H. Halff Associates 4. Carter & Burgess, Inc. 5. Knowlton, English, Flowers, Inc (Tie) 6. Yandell & Hiller (Tie) 7. Worrell & Associates The amount budgeted for these services is $50,000. I RECOMMENDATION: 4IÞlt is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate a contract for Engineering Services , beginning with Rady & Associates, and present the contract for approval by the City Council. ~ I I Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budg ___ _ Other jÎ I UI ~ ~ ~ ' &6part ~t Head Signature · CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available /(U~ . Finance Director City Manager Page 1 of 1 ~'·,'"e",.."",''',,< ..,"""""" CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance ubject: Utility Lockbox Services/Printing Services - 10/10/88 - Council Meeting Date: GN 88-99 Agenda Number: In an infonnal report to the Mayor and City Council suhnitted June 27, 1988, the Lockbox Concept for Utility and Tax receipts was presented for consideration. At that t:i.rœ, the Staff was directed to prepare bid specifications and continue towards implementation. Due to the lead t:i.rœ required, to design and test the Lockbox Concept, the bid specifications did not include the Ad Valorem Tax portion. This portion will be considered as a m:xlification to the contract and sub'nitted to City Council at a later date. Implementation can be expected with the 1989 Tax Year. The bids were received for both the Banking and Printing Services on September 26, 1988. An evaluation of the bids for Banking Services was necessary to ensure that volumes and clearing techniques were consistent among the bidders. In addition, it was noted that our request for microfilming would result in a duplication of standard bank procedures. Checks are microfi1læd as part of the clearing process. Therefore, the cost of microfilming was deleted fran each bid. The results are as follows: TAB NCNB Texas * MBank $ 48,507 47,616 45,272 As mentioned above, bids for the printing and mailing services were also received on September 26, 1988. Bids for the printing and mailing services were as follows: Stanford Financial Venture Encoding * Intec Business $231,100 177,600 155,597 Appropriation of funds for the above items are included in the current Utility Fimd budget. Recœmendation: Award of Lockbox Banking Services Contract to * MBank and award of the Lockbox Printing/Mailing Services Contract to * Intec Business Systems both being lowest and best bid. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~-:~~ ~~~ ~v 11 / ubz~ City Manager 02-20-01-4800 02-20-01-2600 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) . Operating Budge't Other ~ ~ I Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I Department: Public Works 4IÞ.s b· Approval of Change Order No. I u Ject: Water System improvements I I I I I I Ie I I I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget . Other I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 10/10/88 - Council Meeting Date: 3 - Grapevine Highway Agenda Number: PW 88-38 The proposed Change Order No. 3 is for replacement of a defective check valve with a new pump control valve in the Conn Drive Booster Pump Station at Booth Calloway Drive and Conn Drive. This construction is submitted as a change order due to the probable. increase in cost if this job was bid-by itself. Change Order No.3 will cost $9,200. Original Contract Price Approved Change Orders To Date Change Order No. 3 $ 311,111.00 21,347.50 9,200.00 $ 341,658.50 500,000.00 Total Control Price To Date Total Budgeted for this Project Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of Change Order No.3 in the amount of $9,200. Finance Review REV Acct. Number 02-09-22-6700 Sufficient Funds Available ~ 71l~ ~ City Manager . Finance Director t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Paae 1 of 1 I- I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 27, 1988 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Tex. 76180 Re: 3-553, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS GRAPEVINE HWY. WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 Attached is Change Order No. 3 to the referenced project which has been executed by the Contractor, Circle 'C' Construction. This change order is for replacement of a defective check valve with a new Pump Control Valve in the Conn Drive Booster Pump Station. You may wish to place this change order on the next Council agenda for Council consideration of approval. Please confirm if you want us to go ahead and have the control valve order placed before Council approval to save time. After Council approval of this change order, please return a fully executed copy of the change order form to our office for our files. Please call if you have any questions. w.~ RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra/F3553C03A/Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. Larry Jones, City Inspector 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I K-E- F NO. 3-553 CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO THE CONTRACT WHICH WAS DATED JUNE 23 , 1988 Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CIRCLE ·C· CONSTRUCTION CO. (OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) And For (Description of Project) GRAPEVIIŒ HIGHIJAY ~ATER SYSTEM IMPROVH1ENTS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: At the Conn Drive Booster Pump Station, No. 5 Booster Pump: 1. Remove existing fittings consisting of: 1 - 811 Dia. Swing Check Valve 1 - 811 Dia. Elbow 1 - 811 Dia. x 911 Long Nipple 1 - 811 X 1011 Dia. Reducing Elbow Removal of above items is subsidiary to replacement items. Removed items remain property of the Owner. 2. Furnish and install 1 - 1011 pump control valve canplete with all fittings, wiring and controls to allow the valve to open and close slowly during normal pump start up and shut down and close slowly in the event of power failure or emergency shutdown. The valve shall be a diaphragm actuated, hydraulically operated angle type valve. Control of valve operation shall be by means of an externally mounted, four-way solenoid pilot valve. Self cleaning strainers shall be used to protect the control system. Valve shall utilize line pressure for operation. A limit switch must be installed to be adjustable over entire valve travel. Controls shall include a time delay of sufficient time to allow the valve to close fully in the event of a power failure, before allowing the pump to restart. Valve shall be Clayton 60-15 Booster Pump Control Valve. 3. Furnish and install fittings consisting of: 1 - 811 Dia. to 1011 Dia. Reducing Flanged Coupling with Anchor Studs Between Bolts 1 - 1011 Dia. x 3 1/811 Long Nipple 1 - 1011 X 1011 Dia. Elbow Add the following quantities to existing Contract Items: NO. 1 2 UNIT PRICE TOTAL $ 17¿JO tJ(j DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANT. 1 1 1011 Pump Control Valve & Controls 811 & 10" Cast Iron Flanged Fittings EACH t) (} D tr' L.S. /S"oo 15,/()ð SUB-TOTAL ............................. TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST ............... EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT .............. REVISED CONTRACT A~'10UUT ............... $ 'ie/Of) IJ (J 326,056.00 $~~G/~5",O() 1- / . .,/' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I " Page 2, Change Order No.3, K-E-F No. 3-553 Contract completion time shall be increased by CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE: /J/ ' / /" / ./ By: / /' /¿Û J? 1. C' / _ :) (0 // ~ ( (ll j ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE: By: &N();~ ~ , / / OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Date: Date: Date: days because of this change. 9 - -2 / , 1988 Cj.. ~ 7 , , 1988 , 19 88 I Department: Public Works 4ILubject: Approval of Change Order No. 13 - Watauga Road II Paving and Drainage Improvements I" I e . < ··..,.-~·'''·r ·cc<"· ,< ""';"·)"".:"":".'~""''''''.r'""c c, ''''''......' .,..... "', <." CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS - Council Meeting Date: 10/10/88 Agenda Number: PW 88-39 The subject change order covers the cost to add a sidewalk/retaining wall along the south side of Watauga Road across the Kroger shopping center and Stop-N-Go frontage. Grade separation is too great between parking lot and back of curb elevations to be handled by grading alone and therefore will require some retaining wall construction. The cost of Change Order No. 13 is $10,627.06. Original Contract Price Approved Change Orders To Date Change Order No. 13 $ 3,361,596.24 403,806.76 10,627.06 Total Contract Price To Date Total Construction Budget $ 3,776,030.06 $ 3,765,403.00 Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available in Unspecified Streets CIP and will require a transfer as indicated below. From To 13-90-99-4300 $10,627.06 Unspecified 1986 GO - Streets 13-01-86-6150 $10,627.06 Watauga Road Construction Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 13 in the amount of $10,627.06 and the transfer of funds as described above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operati g Budget .,Oth ---.GO . Finance Director See above J ~ Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Pace 1 of __~ I' . I, :ill i L:" .!, iJi~ . I i _ _ _;¡ !I!i -no I;! . I~IÎ I ! . :,'I~~ i ~ 1'~lìifil ! .s.le~ I, ii iii Ii I .. I II ! ,.Ia 'I. ¡:!I!,-. '-,'I I" I , 5 I I I ¡ ·'!I;~!!"-!I' I····I~II··I·· il il· .IE ¡I" I § I II : i~ II ~ I ¡III: l'leïd~~ t. - i"===i I ~II · ;; III.!! = i !.: !! it i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ :j j ~ ~ ~ ~ ïJ! ... å' t i. i åv Ii Ii -J' (($rJN .J~~HS ~~S) 00." Y.J$ ~N/7 H~.J.YII --~- . Ie I - I i r I' · ~ ~ i I I · I ~ I · ~ : ! ! .. I I : i. I I .. i o , J , / , ~ I. I , I I .; , I I I J~l! , , ~ I , ...... .... .... ¡ail ' : I I I -~~ ¡;., ~~ , I , , , I;c , , ~~ J l'-b Î. , ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ . « f 1- ~~ .! ~ . I.----__~~--__:~___:__: S!5 I' -":=:-.:-:;:---,, ~;;;;==~~~-;:~; , / - . L"\J' )r-·---:(I-----~ r-- , I, a. I. I I . , I .., ; ! I I·" =~: I I ,-: _'I Ij!!11 J in: :iU1!j H¡¡¡¡! 8. ~ ill!!I· ~!'Ii I I ~~I "I' I l:.'. S i . I·eli'i.' ~ 1¡!sJII~ 1_, .,_ . t ~ - ,; iiil i ii _Ii: !, II J a I. ¡ i i I .,. -I ~ !i:ll:i IliJ~li e . ~ii, 1=1 I;I~ !I! !:te; .lle . .. ¡~.. I ~I .;! I I.... ~:&!¡ (/S"ON .J~~HS ~~SJ 00<1-6 ·Y.J.S ~N/7 H~.J. YII ¡' .; t I 1 k l' ('i ~~ i )1 1 .,.... i i' t i t i I I ,/ // ~ ;/ /'" ./.... _ _ -.;;.í~- 2 i~ ¡ I, ~I II . i I~ ~ I I ! ~~ ~ "I 00." ·Y.J.S ~N/7 N~.lYII ". '''M :J :JU~ :J7C"' ra ........ . o Z ac \a.I ~ ~ () U1 ~ :2: tC( :t " ~ \U \\\ ~ Q ~ ~ I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I '. an CHAMFER SA~I CUT \ · EXISTING CONCRETE PARKING LOT 3000 PSI CONCRETE PARAPLASTI C SEALER ~ RETAINING WALL ~ TYPICAL SECTION STA. 2+37.3 TO STAI 3+48.8 NOT TO SCALE La.J LLJ CI) I LI.J en ...J LLJ - - u.. 0::0 < a:: :> a.. - o pR.O.W. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .... KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 22, 1988 Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Tex. 76180 Re: 3-336, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WATAUGA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 I 4-0- R::l / VUt1í()/) U Attached is proposed Change Order No. 13 to the referenced proj~r your review and approval. This change order covers the cost ~ add a sidewalk and retaining wall along the south side of Ryfe ~R9,,~in the vicinity of the Stop-n-Go and Kroger parking areas. The total amount of the proposed change order, based on revised quantities and existing contract unit prices is $10,627.06. You may wish to place this change order on the next Council agenda for Council consideration of approval. After Council approval of this change order, we will send it to the Contractor, Austin Paving, for review and approval. We will be present at the next Council meeting to discuss this change order. Meanwhile, please call if you have any other questions. w~ R CHARD V. ALBIN, P.E. RYA/ra/F3336co13/Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I~ ' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I K·E·F NO. 3-336 CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 TO THE CONTRACT YHICH YAS DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 1987 Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (OVNER) (CONTRACTOR) And AUSTIN PAVING For (Description of Project) VATAUGA ROAD · PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: £ Construction 4-foot wide, 4-inch thick concrete sidewalk from Sta. 0+60 to Sta. 5+20 on the south side of Vatauga Road. Also, construct formed reinforced concrete retaining wall on south side of Vatauga Road from Sta. 2+37.3 to Sta. 4+65.1 as shown on Plan Sheets 49R and 50R. Add the following quantities to existing Contract items ITEM UNIT EST. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANT. 5P. Sawcuts L.F. $1.55 104 14P. 6" Curb and 12" Gutter L.F. $4.61 67 16P. 5" Thick Conc. Driveways S.F. $2.06 630 21P. 4" Thick Cone. Sidewalks S.F. $2.06 1436 35D. CI. 'A' 3000 psi Formed Cone. C.Y. $212.21 27 37D. 2" Dia. Veep Holes EACH $9.52 18 TOTAL COST $161.20 $308.87 $1,297.80 $2,958.16 $5,729.67 $171.36 * TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST .......................... $10,627.06 EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT.......................... $ REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT .......................... $ * Based on previously approved change orders at time of approval of this change order. Contract completion time shall be increased by days because of this change. CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE: By: Date: , 1988 ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE: By: Date: , 1988 OVNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Date: , 1988