HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1988-10-10 Agendas
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~I
~I
,~I
tl
:;1
-......."...........:.....
~
1,1
I
-
I
;',¡:,c.,',''';>-
...
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 10, 1988 - 6:00 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 Northeast Loop 820.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1.
Ordinance No. 1572, Proposed
Amendment to Ordinance No. 1080
(Zoning Ordinance) Regarding
Signs (Agenda Item No. 16)
(15 Minutes)
2. GN 88-97 Amendment to Water Service
Contract with the City of Fort
Worth, Ordinance No. 1568
(Agenda Item No. 19) (5 Minutes)
3. GN 88-98 Contract for Golf Course
Engineering (Agenda Item No. 20)
(15 Minutes)
4. PW 88-39 Approval of Change Order No. 13
- Watauga Road Paving and
Drainage Improvements (Agenda
Item No. 23) (5 Minutes)
5.
Mayors Council Water Contract
Renegotiation Committee - Mayor
Brown (15 Minutes)
6.
Possible Work Session (5
Minutes)
7.
Other Items (10 Minutes)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
":;1
'I
!?I
I
;1
',I
"I
,I
~I
I
I
I
Page 2
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
* 8. Executive Session (10 Minutes)
a. Litigation
9. Adjourn - 7:20 p.m.
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the
Open Meetings Law. If any action is
contemplated, it will be taken in open session.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 10, 1988
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda
for discussion and/or action.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1. Ca 11 to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Minutes of the Special Meeting September 20,
1988
5. Minutes of the Regular Meeting September 26,
1988
6. Presentation of Proclamation - Car Care Month
7. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda
8. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk
(17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, & 23)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
9. PZ 88-14 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request of the North
Richland Hills Baptist Church to
rezone Lots A thru F and G-2
Calloway Acres Addition, Lots 3
thru 17 and a portion of Lot C,
Parchman Addition and Tracts 4A1
and 4A2, A.G. Walker Survey,
Abstract 1630, from C-l
(Commercial), R-7 (Multi-family)
and U (Institutional) to U
(Institutional) (Located South of
Glenview Drive between Vance Road
and Scruggs Drive)
10. Ordinance No. 1570
11. PZ 88-15 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request of Mildred
Kidwell to Rezone Tract 7A and a
portion of Tract 7A6, S.
Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266
from AG (Agriculture) to OC
(Outdoor Commercial) (Located on
Davis Boulevard northeast of
Timber Drive)
12. Ordinance No. 1571
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 3
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
13. PZ 88-17 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request of the City of
North Richland Hills to rezone a
portion of Tracts 2F and 2B, T.
Akers Survey, Abstract 19 from
I-2 (Industrial) to R-2 (Single
Family) (Located north of Loop
820 and bounded on the west by
Haltom City)
14. Ordinance No. 1573
15. PZ 88-16 Public Hearing to Consider
Proposed Amendment to Ordinance
No. 1080 (Zoning Ordinance)
Regarding Signs
16. Ordinance No. 1572
*17. PS 88-7
Request of Several Homeowners to
Replat Lots 10R-I1R, Block 9,
Lots lR-9R, Block 6, Haltom
Ranchland Addition, and Lots
3R-5R, and 7R, Block 4, Diamond
Loch North Addition (Located on
the south side of Tabor Street
between Rufe Snow Drive and
Diamond Loch North)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 4
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*18. PS 88-21 Consideration of a Variance
request from Immanuel Evangelical
Lutheran Church on Tract A, Block
7, Holiday Heights Addition for
Calloway Branch Creek
*19. GN 88-97 Amendment to Water Service
Contract with the City of Fort
Worth, Ordinance No. 1568
*20. GN 88-98 Contract for Golf Course
Engineering
*21. GN 88-99 Utility Lock Box
Services/Printing Services
*22. PW 88-38 Approval of Change Order No. 3 _
Grapevine Highway Water System
Improvements
*23. PW 88-39 Approval of Change Order No. 13 _
Watauga Road Paving and Drainage
Improvements
24. Citizens Presentation
Mrs. Mary Lou Smathers Day
7509 Chapman
Re: Chapman Road Assessment
25. Adjournment
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 20, 1988 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting to order September 20, 1988, at 7:30 p.m.
2.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Tommy Brown Mayor
Richard Davis Mayor Pro Tem
Lyle Welch Councilman
Mack Garvin Councilman
Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman
Byron Sibbet Councilman
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Rewis
Rex McEntire
City Manager
Senior Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
Absent:
Virginia Moody
Linda Spurlock
Councilwoman
Councilwoman
3.
ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. PERSONNEL
B. BRIEFING ON PENDING LITIGATION
C. REVIEW OF PROGRESS ON LAND ACQUISITION
Executive Session was not held.
4.
PU 88-50 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR ACQUISITION
OF LAND FROM RICHMOND BAY DEVELOPMENT _
RESOLUTION NO. 88-33
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve
Resolution No. 88-33.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that regarding Section 1.3b, it was his
understanding that if the City was able to acquire the property, the City
would be given the $89,000.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 20, 1988
Page 2
Mr. Sanford stated that the last section stated that if there were not
costs for the land, the money would be paid to the City at the opening of
the golf course.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that Section 2.3f regarding signs - the City
might have a problem with Haltom City on the sign and asked if that
potential problem had been solved.
Mr. Frank stated it was his understanding that if North Richland Hills
granted Meadow Lakes the space they would go to Haltom City and try to
acquire permission for the sign.
Mr. Sanford stated he would like to have the wording in the contract
changed to state "the City would allow the sign for five years or until
all of the lots were sold, whichever came first".
Mayor Pro Tem Davis referred to Section 4.1c pertaining to railroad
easement - and asked Mr. Frank if he had already obtained the easement.
Mr. Frank stated they had an easement from the railroad to the former
developer and they would insert the City of North Richland Hills and
Recreational Services Limited. Mr. Frank stated it would be a permanent
easement for the City and a temporary easement for the contractor.
Mr. Line stated he would suggest that the closing date be changed from
October 11th to October 10th because the City at the time did not think
that the proceeds of the sale of the certificates of obligation would be
received until October 15th and wanted to have the closing prior to that
date. Mr. Line stated that he learned Friday that the proceeds of the
sale would be delivered Monday, October 11th and wanted to move the
closing to October 10th so the City would know they had the land before
they accepted delivery of the bonds.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if the City was getting an Owner's Title Policy
on the property.
Mr. McEntire stated no, it would be a Special Warranty Deed.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked that the Staff to be instructed to look into the
cost effective means of possibly getting an Owner's Title Policy.
Motion, with changes as noted, carried 5-0.
5.
GN 88-79 APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE CHANGING THE EFFECTIVE DATE
OF ORDINANCE NO. 1543 FROM OCTOBER 1, 1988 TO DECEMBER 1, 1988 _
ORDINANCE NO. 1566
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve
Ordinance No. 1566.
Motion carried 5-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 20, 1988
Page 3
6.
GN 88-80 APPROVAL OF MANAGEMENT CONTRACT WITH
RECREATIONAL SERVICES LIMITED -
RESOLUTION NO. 88-35
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Metts, to approve
Resolution No. 88-35.
Mayor Brown stated that under Section 2(d) - Start-Up Budget, on what they
were going to purchase did not mention golf carts.
Mr. McEntire stated they may want to lease the golf carts.
Mr. Line stated that if golf carts were not mentioned somewhere else in
the contract, it needed to be added.
Mr. McEntire stated the wording would be changed to purchase and/or lease
and would include adequate golf carts.
Mayor Brown referred to Item 5 - Clubhouse and Other Start-up Items funded
by the City shall be the property or obligation of RSL and asked if the
City was going to purchase them.
Mr. McEntire stated the contract was talking about other than those items
which were purchased with the start-up items.
Mayor Brown referred to Item 9 - Upon Termination of the Agreement _ RSl
would sell, transfer and assign all of the assets which would properly be
reflected on the Financial Statements of the facility. Mayor Brown asked
sell to who.
Mr. McEntire stated to the City.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the wording "all assets will be assigned to the
City" needed to be added.
Councilman Sibbet referred to Section 2(a) - Major Decisions - and asked
if the decisions for major purchases would be approved by the City Manager
or Council.
Mr. Line stated he did not contemplate that any prior approval for
expenditures other than items not budgeted for would have to be approved.
Councilman Welch asked how the course would be policed once it was
operational.
Mr. Line stated after it started operation someone on the staff would be
assigned responsibility for supervision of the golf course operator and
during the construction period George Tucker would monitor.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked Marty Streiff if he would have a problem with
working with the Park and Recreation Board looking at updates and changes
to the policies of the operation.
I '
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 20, 1988
Page 4
Mr. Streiff replied no.
Motion, with changes as noted, carried 5-0.
7.
GN 88-81 APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION CONTRACT
WITH RECREATIONAL SERVICES LIMITED _
RESOLUTION NO. 88-36
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve
Resolution No. 88-36.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis referred to Item 7(c) - Full Time Site Superintendent
and Inspector - and asked if that had been budgeted for.
Mr. Sanford stated that was a part of Recreational Services Limited's
proposal.
Motion carried 5-0.
8.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Brown adjourned the meeting.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 26, 1988 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brown called the meeting to order September 26, 1988, at 7:30 p.m.
Present:
Tommy Brown
Richard Davis
Lyle Welch
Mack Garvin
Byron Sibbet
Linda Spurlock
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Rewis
Rex McEntire
Richard Albin
2.
ROLL CALL
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilwoman
City Manager
Senior Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
City Engineer
Absent:
Virginia Moody Councilwoman
Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman
3.
INVOCATION
Councilman Sibbet gave the invocation.
4.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 12, 1988
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin stated that at the September 12, 1988 Council Meeting,
he made a motion on Item No. 14, in respect to some rezoning and left out
part of the motion which was a positive type zoning that needed to be
added. Councilman Garvin stated the motion was relative to industrial
zoning off of Amundson Road and a portion of the property right north of
Watauga Road and as his motion was stated that property would have been
industrial, the intent was for that to be C-1. Councilman Garvin stated
he would like to amend his motion on Ordinance No. 1564 by adding lithe
property situated north of Watauga Road that particular tract of land be
zoned C-I (Commercial).
Mayor Pro Tern Davis seconded the amendment.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 26, 1988
Page 2
Motion carried 3-0; Councilwoman Spurlock and Councilman Welch abstaining
due to absence from the meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the
minutes of September 12, 1988 as amended.
Motion carried 3-0; Councilwoman Spurlock and Councilman Welch abstaining
due to absence from the meeting.
5.
PRESENTATION OF GREEN THUMB AWARD
TO JASON MERIT, DISTRICT MANAGER OF TWO PESOS
(PRESENTATION TO BE MADE BY BRUCE AULD AND
WANDA STRONG, NORTHEAST TARRANT COUNTY CHAMBER
OF COMMERCE)
Mr. Bruce Auld, President of Northeast Tarrant County Chamber of Commerce,
introduced Ms. Wanda Strong, Chairman of Project Pride.
Ms. Strong presented the Green Thumb Award to Mr. Jason Merit, Manager for
Two Pesos.
6.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Pro Tem Davis removed Item No. 24 from the Consent Agenda.
7.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25,
26, 27, 28, 29, 30 & 31)
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the
Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 5-0.
8.
GN 88-82 APPOINTMENTS TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the
following appointments to the Board of Adjustment.
Place 2
Place 4
Place 6
Jim Kemp
Jeff Bunting
Harold Schubert
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Motion carried 5-0.
9.
GN 88-83 APPOINTMENTS TO BOARD OF APPEALS
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the
following appointments to the Board of Appeals.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 26, 1988
Page 3
Place 2
Place 4
Place 6
Place 7 (Alternate)
Joe Crane
Mary Norwood
Robert Skinner
Eric Hill
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Motion carried 5-0.
10.
GN 88-84 APPOINTMENTS TO CABLE TV BOARD
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to approve the
following appointments to the Cable TV Board.
Place 2
Place 4
Place 6
George Angle
Ray Fulenwider
Pat Carruth
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Motion carried 5-0.
11.
GN 88-85 APPOINTMENTS TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to approve the
following appointments to the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee.
Place 2
Place 4
Alternate
David Barfield
David Green
Patricia Marin
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Motion carried 5-0.
12.
GN 88-86 APPOINTMENTS TO CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve the
following appointments to the Civil Service Commission.
Place 2 (Alternate)
Place 4
Place 6 (Alternate)
Place 7
Bernard R. Roux
George Pederson
Steve Hall
Bob Roark
Term expires October, 1989
Term expires October, 1989
Term expires October, 1989
Term expires October, 1989
Motion carried 5-0.
13.
GN 88-87 APPOINTMENTS TO LIBRARY BOARD
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the
following appointments to the Library Board.
Place 2
Place 4
Jan Daniels
Roxie Hamilton
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 26, 1988
Page 4
Place 6
Alternate
Kay Schmidt
A 1 i s a Wood
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Motion carried 5-0.
14.
GN 88-88 APPOINTMENTS TO PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD
Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the
following appointments to the Parks and Recreation Board.
Place 2
Place 4
Place 6
Wade Parkey
Don Tipps
Douglass Davis
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Motion carried 5-0.
15.
GN 88-89 APPOINTMENTS TO BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
Councilwoman Spurlock moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve
the following appointments to the Beautification Committee.
Place 1
Place 2
Place 3
Place 4
Place 5
Place 6
Place 7
Katheryne Robinson
Juanita Kemp
Robert Powers
Janice Davis
Alice Scoma
Arfan Jabri
Pat Fisher
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Motion carried 5-0.
16.
GN 88-90 APPOINTMENTS TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the
following appointments to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Place 2
Place 4
Alternate
David Barfield
David Green
Patricia Marin
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Term expires September, 1990
Motion carried 5-0.
*17.
GN 88-91 CERTIFIED TAX ROLL - RESOLUTION NO. 88-30
APPROVED
*18.
GN 88-92 GRANTING OF EXEMPTIONS FY 1988-89 _
RESOLUTION NO. 88-37
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 26, 1988
Page 5
APPROVED
*19.
GN 88-93 SETTING TAX RATE FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1988-89 - ORDINANCE NO. 1567
APPROVED
*20.
GN 88-94 ADOPTING BUDGET FY 1988-89 - ORDINANCE NO. 1569
APPROVED
*21.
GN 88-95 TRANSFER OF LAIDLAW WASTE DISPOSAL FEES
- ORDINANCE NO. 1555
APPROVED
*22.
GN 88-96 PROPOSED AS/400 COMPUTER SYSTEM
APPROVED
*23.
PU 88-51 AWARD OF BID TO MILLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
FOR THE ANNUAL OFFICE SUPPLY CONTRACT
APPROVED
24.
PU 88-52 RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE BID
FOR CITY PROPERTY INSURANCE FOR 1988-89
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve PU
88-52 authorizing City Staff to execute a contract with Employer's
Casualty Insurance, deductible of $1,000, premium of $19,617 and waive the
bid requirement of A+10 rating.
Ms. Jerry Sheeran, representing Key and Piskurant and Sherran Insurance
Company, Arlington, appeared before the Council.
Ms. Sheeran stated she wanted to make a protest to the exception of the
bid from Employers and the changing of the specifications. Ms. Sheeran
stated the specifications were published and her agency went by the bid
information which said the bidder must be A+10 or better. Ms. Sheeran
stated this was not going by the bid specs to after the fact accept the
bid and change the specs to fit that particular bidder.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he did not think the Council was changing the
bid specifications just so the bid of Employer's could be accepted. Mayor
Pro Tern Davis stated it was dollars and cents to the Council and was
saving approximately $12,000.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 26, 1988
Page 6
Ms. Sheeran stated that in that case she felt it should be rebid with the
lesser bid ratings.
Councilwoman Spurlock stated she felt that if the specifications were
changed it was not fair because perhaps other companies would have bid if
the specifications had been lower.
Councilman Sibbet stated there was a possibility that the bid would have
been better from other companies if the bid package had specified the
lower ratings.
Ms. Sheeran stated her agency went exactly by what was on the bid.
Councilman Sibbet stated if the specifications were put out that way he
felt the City needed to consider it and live with it.
Councilwoman Spurlock asked if the City had a deadline on obtaining the
insurance.
Mr. Line stated the current policy expired October 1st. Mr. Line asked
Mr. McEntire if it would be possible to get a rider and extend the
expiration date for a month.
Mr. McEntire asked Ms. Sheeran if Hartford would give the City a thirty
day rider in order for the City to have time to rebid the insurance.
Ms. Sheeran stated she would check with her company and let the City know
first thing in the morning.
After further discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by
Councilman Garvin, to add an amendment to the motion stating subject to
provisions of acceptance of a thirty-day binder from the existing carrier
and if rebidding could be done by the October 24th Council Meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
*25.
PU 88-53 NEW FIRE STATION - REPLACEMENT
FOR FIRE STATION #2, 6801 GLENVIEW
APPROVED
*26.
PU 88-54 REJECTING ALL BIDS (PROPOSALS)
ON GOLF COURSE - RESOLUTION NO. 88-38
APPROVED
*27.
PU 88-55 PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM
JENNY COLEMAN, ET AL FOR THE PURPOSE OF
CONSTRUCTING SMITHFIELD ROAD (PARCEL #3)
APPROVED
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
September 26, 1988
Page 7
*28.
PW 88-34 APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 _
GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
*29.
PW 88-35 APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 10
- WATAUGA ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
*30.
PW 88-36 APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 11
- WATAUGA ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
*31.
PW 88-37 APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 12 _
WATAUGA ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVED
32.
CIITZEN PRESENTATION
Ms. Myrtis Byrd, Byrd Automotive, appeared before the Council.
~
Ms. Byrd stated the month of October had been designated as "Car Care
Month". Ms. Byrd briefed the Council on what the organization did. Ms.
~rd stated there would be a car care event October 28th and 29th at North
Hills Mall and invited the Council to attend.
33.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to adjourn the
meeting.
Motion carried 5-0.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
I
Ie·
I
~~
~
eity of
~orth ~cWand Hills
I
I
I
I
I
I WHEREAS, the cftizenð 0-6 the c.uy 0-6 NoJr.:th R.lclr1.and.
H~ have ex.pILe.ð-6ed. the.út -6t1long du.úLe -6oIL -6a6eJt C.lVLð,
a cleaneJt and heaf..tJúeJt env.úLonment, and. the C.OnðeJtvailon
0-6 eneJtgy ILUOWlC.U¡ and
I
WHEREAS, the pllOPeJl Uðe 0-6 -6ue.tð and emi..6-6ionð
c.o l'ttJLoR.. equipment c.o tttJr.-lbutu to b åteJl o.Á.Jt qualäy and
mOILe eir61-c.lent OPeJLa.ti.Ott 0-6 veJúclu¡ and
Ie
WHEREAS, ILoutine C.M malntenanc.e hað been -6hown
to be a c.otttJr.-lbutoIL to automob.i1.e -6a6áy, etthattc.ed. ..}uel
ec.o nomy and Iled.UC.ed. C.M e.mrn.i.ð-6.l0 nð j arui
I
WHEREAS, Oc.tobeJl ið an oppoJr.:tune :time to pILepMe
automob.llu -6oIL winteJt'-6 hazMdoUð ~ving c.o~Onð by
p~ollming pILeventive maintenanc.e¡ and
WHEREAS, automotive -6eJtv.lc.e að-6ouailOttð arui
otheJl pubUc. .ð eJtv.lc.e gILoup-6 Me að.M..óting motoJLi..ðu .In
lealltúng about pllOpeJt c.aJt c.aJLe¡ and
I
WHEREAS, the State' -6 PubUc. Sa6ety VeplVLtment
-6uUy -6UPPoJtU pllogJtaJ'nð thlLt .únpllove the -6a6e and eir61-uent
opeJULtiOtt 0-6 vehiclu.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Tommy Bllown, MayolL 0-6 the
c.uy 0-6 NoJtth R.lc.hland H~, do heJteby pILocla1.m the month
0-6 OctobeJt, 1988 að:
I
I
CAR CARE MONTH
I
in the C.uy o..} NolLth R.lc.h1and. H~ and LVlge ail cftizettð
to .j o.ltt in tÝLÚ> ei,.601Lt .
I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have
heJleunto -6 á my han.d and c.aUð ed.
the Seal 0-6 the C.u.y 0-6 NolLth
R.lc.hland H~ to be ~ed.
tÝLÚ> 10th day 0-6 OctobeJt, 1988.
I
Ie
Tommy Bllown - MayolL
I
,..; .
I
I Department:
_Ubject:
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Economic Development
10/10/88
- Council Meeting Date:
Public Hearing on Request of the North Richland Hills A !nd N PZ 88-14
BaptI.st l;hurch to Rezone Lots A through F and G-2, CalÜ~aya umber:
Acres Addition, Lots 3 through 17 and a Portion of Lot~C, ~
Parchman Addition, and Tracts 4A1 and 4A2, A. G. Walker Survey,
Abstract 1630 from Cl, R-7-MF & U to U.
Ordinance No. 1570
This Rezoning Request is presented on the property located south of Glenview Drive
between Vance Road and Scruggs Drive. The requested rezoning is from C-1, Commercial,
R-7-MF Multi-Family and U Institutional to U Instutional.
Church use is allowed in C-1 and R-7-MF as a conditional use. However, the applicants,
in working with the City Staff are requesting the U Zone District for clarification
and to aid in updating the City's Land Use Maps. It is the intention of the applicants
to construct additional church facilities on the subject properties.
RECOMMENDATION:
4IÞThe Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 88-14 be
approved.
The City Council should hold the required Public Hearing and act upon the recommendation
of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
4IÞ Other ~
Departme
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Q~~ /j~{J1I--
t Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of __~
C-2
dSU·
1215
L
u
?1:~-\~
c.-\ ) JL-1-m f J U. -rO U
o 500
~~~-
1000
1500 2000 2roo 3000
I
P OF
RTH
c
I
Page 2
P & Z Minutes
September 8, 1988
(
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
PZ 88-14
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
Mr. Sanford stated this property ·
north of the freeway, bounde the
west by Haltom City and he east by
the new golf cours operty.
Chairman winger called for those
wis to speak in opposition to this
quest to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PZ 88-17. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 7-0.
Mr. Wood requested that he be allowed
to step down for the next item.
Request of North Richland Hills
Baptist Church to rezone Lots A thru F
and G-2, Calloway Acres Addition, Lots
3 thru 17 and a portion of Lot C,
Parchman Addition, and Tracts 4A1 and
4A2, A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630
from their present classifications of
C-1 Commercial, R-7-MF Multi-Family
and U Institutional to U
Institutional. This property is
located south of Glenview Drive
between Vance Road and Scruggs Drive,
4001 Vance Road.
Chairman Schwinger opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Mark Wood came forward to represent
the church. He stated they want to
consolidate all property the church
owns into one zoning classification in
anticipation of the upcoming plat.
Mr. Wood stated they now have three
different zonings on the property.
Chairman Schwinger called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
·
,
I
Page 3
p & Z Minutes
September 8, 1988
(
Ie
I
I
PZ 88-14
APPROVED
I
I
I
2.
PZ 88-15
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve
PZ 88-14. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 6-0.
Mr. Wood returned to the Commission.
Request of Mildred Kidwell to rezone
Tract 7A and a portion of Tract 7
S. Richardson Survey, Abstract
from their present classifica
AG Agriculture to OC Outdoo
Commercial. This propert is located
on Davis Boulevard, nor east of
Timber Drive.
Chairman Schwinge opened the Public
Hearing and ca d for those wishing
to speak in or of this request to
please com forward.
idwell came forward. He
stat they wish to make use of this
erty for a golf driving range.
Mr. Bowen asked Mr. Kidwell if they
would object to restricting it to a
driving range only.
Mr. Kidwell said that is all they are
considering at this time, but he would
hate to not be allowed to have a kid's
soccer field there.
Mr. Bowen read several of the things
that could be put in Outdoor
Commercial. He said they could
restrict it to Commercial Recreation.
Mr. Kidwell said they would agree to
that.
Mr. Barfield asked if he plans to have
restroom facilities. He said you
would have to have water supply.
'. '-. - -~. ... ..
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
August 25, 1988
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 88-14 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM 'C-l,R-7-MF,U' TO U
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 148
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
SU.S1"l~ ~. Sc I-.~~
SUSAN L. SCHVINGER,G.C.E.
SLS/ss
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager
Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic "Development Director
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works
Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning
Zoning Review
PZ 88-14
Page
1
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
'I
I
I
I
--
I
I
. .
ORDINANCE NO. 1570
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE ¡ .
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE 81080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-14 the following described property shall
be rezoned from C-l, R-7-MF, and U to U.
BEING a tract of land out of the A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630, City of
North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of Calloway
Acres Addition as recorded in Volume 388-J, Page 13 of the Plat Records of
Tarrant County and a portion of Parchman Addition as recorded in Volume
388-W, Page 40 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County and being more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of Lot A, said Calloway Acres Addition;
Thence East, along and with the North line of said Calloway Acres Addition
a distance of 250.0 feet to the intersection of said North line of Calloway
Acres Addition with the West right-of-way of Parchman Street;
THENCE continuing East, a distance of 50.0 feet to lthe intersection of
lthe East R.O.W. of said Parchman Street with the South R.O.W. of Glenview
Drive;
THENCE continutng East, along and with the South R.O.W. of Glenview Drive,
a distance of 347.5 feet to the intersection of said South R.O.W. of
Glenview Drive with the West R.O.W. of Vance Road;
THENCE South, along and with the West R.O.W. of said Vance Road and the
East lines of Lots 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, and 4 of said Parchman Addition, a
distance of 658.8 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 4;
THENCE East, a distance of 6.0 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 3, said
Parchman Addition;
THENCE South, along and with the East lines of Lots 3 and C, said Parchman
Addition, a distance of 147.0 feet to a point;
THENCE North 89 degrees 36 minutes West, a distance of 176.2 feet to a
point on the East line of Lot 7, said Parchman Addition;
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
Page 2
THENCE South, along and with the East line of said Lot 17; a distance of
185.2 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 17;
THENCE South 47 degrees 58 minutes West, along and with the South line of
said Lot 17, a distance of 238.6 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot
17;
THENCE North, along and with the West lines of Lots 17, 16, 15, 14, 13 and
12 of said Parchman Addition, same being the East R.O.W. of Parchman
Street, a distance of 729.9 feet to a point on· the West line of said Lot
12;
THENCE West, a distance of 50.0 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot G-2,
Calloway Acres Addition;
THENCE continuing West, along and with the South line of said Lot G-2, a
distance of 125.0 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot G-2, same being
the Southeast corner of Log G-l, said Calloway Acres Addition;
THENCE North, along and with the common boundary of Lots G-l and G-2, a
distance of 75.0 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot G-2, same being the
Northeast corner of Lot G-l;
THENCE West, along and with the common boundary of Lots G-l and F, a
distance of 125.0 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot F, same being the
Northwest corner of Lot G-l;
THENCE North, along and with the West lines of Lots F, E, D and A, said
Calloway Acres Addition, same being the East R.O.W. of Scruggs Drive, a
distance of 344.7 feet to the place of beginning and containing 10.2 acres
of land, more or less.
This property is located south of Glenview Drive between Vance Road and
Scruggs Drive, 4001 Vance Road.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER,
1988.
~J2
,
~~~~)¡~
SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I"
I
Page 3
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-88-14 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS J CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
)1
:i/l
I
I
I
I
I
I
Source of Funds:
I Bonds (GO/Rev.)
· A. . Operating Budget
I- Other r!Á
Dep rtme
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Economic Development
Subject:
10/10/88
- Council Meeting Date:
Public Hearing on Request of Mildred Kidwell to Rezone PZ 88-15
Tract /A and a 1"ortJ.on of 7A6, s. R.1chardson Survey, Agenda Number:
Abstract 1266, from AG to OC Outdoor Commercial ~
Ordinance No. 1571
This Rezoning Request is presented on vacant property located on Davis Boulevard,
northeast of Timber Drive. The requested rezoning if from AG Agriculture to OC Outdoor
Commercial.
The applicant wishes to construct a golf-driving range facility on the subject property.
At the Public Hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission, several citizens who
reside on Timber Drive spoke not so much against the rezoning but on how the range was
to be constructed in relationship to their property.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 88-15 be
approved with the stipulation that it be limited to recreational use only and at the end
of a five year period the use be re-examined by the Planning and Zoning Commission and
City Council.
The City Council should hold the required Public Hearing and act upon the recommendation
of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
---cjA~~~ ¿¡)~¢
City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
I
I
R-2
C-I
1254
R-2
222
C-I
1198
C-I
SU
AG
R-3
0-1
I
0-1
AG
1311,1318,1319.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 3
p & Z Minutes
September 8, 1988
(
(
There being no one
the Chairman clo
Heari
made the motion to approve
PZ 88-14. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 6-0.
Mr. Wood returned to the Commission.
2.
PZ 88-15
Request of Mildred Kidwell to rezone
Tract 7A and a portion of Tract 7A6,
S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266,
from their present classification of
AG Agriculture to OC Outdoor
Commercial. This property is located
on Davis Boulevard, northeast of
Timber Drive.
Chairman Schwinger opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Curtis Kidwell came forward. He
stated they wish to make use of this
property for a golf driving range.
Mr. Bowen asked Mr. Kidwell if they
would object to restricting it to a
driving range only.
Mr. Kidwell said that is all they are
considering at this time, but he would
hate to not be allowed to have a kid's
soccer field there.
Mr. Bowen read several of the things
that could be put in Outdoor
Commercial. He said they could
restrict it to Commercial Recreation.
Mr. Kidwell said they would agree to
that.
Mr. Barfield asked if he plans to have
restroom facilities. He said you
would have to have water supply.
~
I Page 4 (
P & Z Minutes
1_ September 8, 1988
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
(
Mr. Kidwell stated they already have a
water tap on the property.
Chairman Schwinger asked Mr. Kidwell
if they would agree to Commercial
Recreation only.
Mr. Kidwell stated they would agree to
recreational use only.
Mr. Barfield said some driving ranges
are lighted. He asked if they plan to
light this one.
Mr. Kidwell said they do plan to light
it.
Mr. Tucker stated there are strict
guidelines in the Zoning Ordinance
regarding lighting.
Chairman Schwinger called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
Roger Martin, 8633 Timber Drive, came
forward. He said his property is
adjacent to this property. He said he
has questions for Mr. Kidwell
regarding lighting and where the
driving range would be located. Mr.
Martin stated they have problems with
the lights from the City Park, but
they shut down around 10:00 or 10:30.
Mr. Kidwell stated the driving range
would be adjoining Davis Boulevard.
He said Mr. Martin's property is
further down. Mr. Kidwell said the
lights they would have would not be as
good as the city's, but they plan to
shut down about 10:00 o'clock.
Mr. Wood asked how far the driving
range would be from Mr. Martin's
house.
Mr. Kidwell said there would be a tree
line between.
· ~
I
Page 5
P & Z Minutes
September 8, 1988
(
(
~
I
James Hanson, 8613 Timber Drive, came
forward. He asked if they plan to
have concessions, hamburgers, etc.
I
I
Mr. Kidwell stated they do not intend
to have anything like that. He said
they might have cold drinks.
I
Mr. Barfield asked Mr. Kidwell to show
where the driving range would be. Mr.
Martin and Mr. Hanson came forward to
see how close it would be to their
houses.
I
I
Mr. Barfield said the people's back
yards could be in line. He said the
Tee Boxes would be 250 feet from Davis
Boulevard and the drive is 1400 feet.
Mr. Barfield said a 300 yard drive
could possibly hit the back yards.
I
~
Mr. Martin said the OC would continue
down behind his house.
I
I
Chairman Schwinger called for anyone
else wishing to speak to please come
forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
I
PZ 88-15
APPROVED
Mr. Barfield made the motion to
approve PZ 88-15 with the stipulation
that the OC be limited to recreational
use and at the end of 5 years this
request be brought back before the
Commission. This motion was seconded
by Mr. Wood and the motion carried
7-0.
I
I
I
I
,
I
3. PZ 88-17
4. PZ 88-16
PZ 88-16
APPROVED
This item was moved
of the agenda.
amendment to Zoning
regarding signs.
Mr. Bowen made the motion to recommend
approval of this amendment to the City
Council. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Barfield and the motion carried
7-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~
I
(.
(
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
August 25, 1988
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 88-15 REVIEY LETTER,
ZONING FROM AG TO OC
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 35
Ye have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
&.S~N cJ... s:c"'~~
SUSAN L. SCHYINGER,G.C.E.
SLS/ss
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager
Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic-Development Director
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks
Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning
Zoning Review
PZ 88-15
Page
1
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
pz..
¡ 3- IS
I
FIELD NOTES FOR: ZONING PURPOSES ONLY
------~-_. ._-~-.--.-- --~- --..------------. ---._---_.__.. _..---
I
I
I
BEING a tract of land out of the STEPHEN RICHARDSON SURVEY,
Abstract No. 1266, Tarrant County, Texas, being described
as follows:
BEGINN ING a t an iron .P in sit \la ted at the Nort heas t corner of
tract of land recorded in Volume 3398, Page 382, Deed Records,
'rarran t C()un t y, 'Texas;
I
I
THENCE North 87 degrees 34 minutes West 188.4 feet to an iron
pin for corner in the Southeasterly R.O.W. line of State
Highway No. 1938;
THENCE North 30 degrees 40 minutes East along said R.O.W.
733.5 feet to an iron pin for corner;
I
I
THENCE South 26 degrees 35 minutes 49 seconds East 1462.16
feet t () an iron pln for corner~
THENCE South 79 degrees 33 minutes 42 seconds West 527.02
feet to an iron I)in for c()rner:
THENCE North 88 degrees 20 minutes 40 seconds East 136.35
feet to an iron pin for corner;
I
I
THENCE North 00 degrees 04 minutes 23 seconds East 30.0 feet
to an iron pln for corner;
I
THENCE North 03 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds West 216.73
feet to an iron pin for corner;
I
THENCE North 87 degrees 01 minutes 28 seconds West 156.54
feet to an iron pin for corner;
I
THENCE North 01 òegree 39 minutes 20 seconds West 513.8 feet
to the place of beginning and containing 15.61 acres of land
more or less.
I
I
I
I
N
.
.
SCALE 1" ;:
LEGEND
. IRON PIN
o !RON PIPE
A BOIS DARC STAKE
o CONCRETE MON
-x-x- FENCE
- "- "- POWER liNE
- T - T - TELEPHONE LINE
-CATV - CABLE 1ELEVISION
SHADED AREA
DEStG NATES CONCRETE
CHARLES B HOOKS. JR
\ -{)', . 3946 , Q-
</. -v 'V 0
:S' . . ~ ~l S T t_ µ.~. '....\..
(. Ie s'u~'\1~
88-886
LOYD BRANSOM SURVEYORS INC.
CHARLES B HOOKS JR.
REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR
1028 NORTH SYLVANIA AVE.
FT. WORTH. TEXAS 76111
834-3477
¡ [) 0 HER E Bye E R T IF Y T HAT T HIS M A. PIS T R U L A I\¡ ~') COR R E: (T A S
SUR V EYE DON r HE G RO UNO AND THE A EAR E NO f AS E M E ~n S 0 R
fNGPO"GHM~P THA~..WN
· ,/ ,/f
8-15-88
DATE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~Alr ?IPGLI/V~
~ ",Cb
~~~
4.J o·
S' ~ ,
o ~ ~~
<b ~~ ",'"
,,~ ,(y
~ ~ ~\I
-~ '
t::)~ ~ - ...,~
~~
A...~
Ci;)
~
~
~
~
~
~
'-)
,
~
~
IS. ~/
IIC,f.Ç5
SHAD'16ROVE
V I C I NIT Y MA P
~
~ ,
~!t)
"
"
"
~\'t
~
~ ~
~~ S1,·33'.f-~"W
~ 5:)' N ¿1¿1 ~ ()' 4¿J'e'
<:) ~ / 3~.a5'
~
~
N
FOR ZONING PURPOSES ONLY
.
A TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE STEPHEN RICHARDS()N SUR\/EY, AE3S1'RACT
1\]0 . 1266, rrA R RANT COlJNTY , 'TEXAS
.
SEE ATTACHED FIELD NOTES
SCALE 1 " :: 20tJ'
LEGEND
. IRON P1N
o IRON PIPE
l:1 BOIS DARC STAKE
o CONCRETE MON
-x-x- F6NCE
- ~ - "- POWER LINE
- T - T - TELEPHONE lIN E
-CATV - CABLE TELEVISION
SHADED AREA
DESIGNATES CONCRETE
LOYD BRANSOM SURVEYORS INC.
CHARLES B HOOKS JR.
REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR
1028 NORTH SYLVANIA AVE.
FT. WORTH. TEXAS 76111
834-3477
I DC H~AE8Y cER1¡Ff THAT THIS MAP IS TRUE A~D CORRECT AS
SURvEYED .jN THE GROUND. AND THEAE ARE NO EASEMENTS OR
ENCROACHMlN rs VISfBLl OTHER THAN T Sf SHOWN
DATE
8 - 1 5 - _8_8
, -
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1571
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE · ~
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE 01080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-15 the following described property shall
be rezoned from AG to OC with the stipulation that it be limited to
recreational use and at the end of 5 years this request be brought back
before the Commission.
BEING a tract of land out of the Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266,
Tarrant County, Texas, being described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron pin situated at the Northeast corner of tract of land
recorded in Volume 3398, Page 382, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE North 87 degrees 34 minutes West 188.4 feet to an iron pin for
corner in the Southeast erly R.O.W. line of State Highway No. 1938;
THENCE North 30 degrees 40 minutes East along said R.O.W. 733.5 feet to an
iron pin for corner;
THENCE South 26 degrees 35 minutes 49 seconds East 1462.16 feet to an iron
pin for corner;
THENCE South 79 degrees 33 minutes 42 seconds West 527.02 feet to an iron
pin for corner;
THENCE North 88 degrees 20 minutes 40 seconds East 136.35 feet to an iron
pin for corner;
THENCE North 00 degrees 04 minutes 23 seconds East 30.0 feet to an iron pin
for corner;
THENCE North 03 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds West 216.73 feet to an iron
pin for corner;
THENCE North 87 degrees 01 minutes 28 seconds West 156.54 feet to an iron
pin for coarner;
THENCE North 01 degree 39 minutes 20 seconds West 513.8 feet to the place
of beginning and containing 15.61 acres of land more or less.
..
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
..
Page 2
This property is located on Davis Boulevard, northeast of Timber Drive.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. THIS 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER,
1988.
C ~
~~\?~~
SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZON G COMMISSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-88-15 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Department:
&Ubject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Economic Development
10/10/88
- Council Meeting Date:
Public Hearing on Request of the City of North Richlan~ HillsN b
genCfã urn er:
to Kezone a ~ort~on of lraCts 2F and 2ß, T.ARers 5uLve, '
Abstract 19 from 1-2 Industrial to R-2 Single Family." ",
Ordinance No. 1573
PZ 88-17
This Rezoning Request is presented on the vacant property located north of Loop 820 and
bounded on the west by Haltom City. The requested rezoning is from 1-2 Industrial to
R-2 Single Family.
"RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 88-17 be
approved.
The City Council should hold the required Public Hearing and act upon the recommendation
of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
_ Other
- ~L1/~
ad Signature ~ City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Fmance Director
~
~"
Page 1 of
1
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
!~
1414
1-2
.\ I
I
I
1-2
\194
1-2
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
(
(
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
SEPTEMBER 8, 1988 7:30 P. M.
CONSIDERATION 0
OF AUGUST 25 988
3.
PZ 88-17
The meeting was called to
Chairman, John Schwinger,
PRESENT:
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Secretary
Members
n Schwinger
Mark Wood
David Barfield
Don Bowen
Carole Flippo
Ron Lueck
James Brock
Manny Tricoli
C. A. Sanford
George Tucker
Wanda Calvert
Member
Economic Dev.
Dir. Planning
p & Z Coordinator
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
the minutes as written. This motion
was seconded by Mr. Lueck and the
motion carried 6-0 with Ms. Flippo
abstaining since she was not present
at the meeting.
Mr. Wood made a motion to move item #3
to the first on the agenda. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and
the motion carried 7-0.
Request of the City of North Richland
Hills to rezone a portion of Tracts 2F
and 2B, T. Akers Survey, Abstract 19,
from their present classification of
1-2 Industrial to R-2 Single Family.
This property is located north of
Northeast Loop 820 and bounded on the
west by Haltom City.
Chairman Schwinger opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
C. A. Sanford, Director of Economic
Development for the City, came
forward. He stated the city is
initiating this zoning request, but
the owners of the property, FSLIC,
do not object.
I
Page 2
P & Z Minutes
September 8, 1988
(
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
PZ 88-17
APPROVED
I
I
1.
PZ 88-14
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
Mr. Sanford stated this property is
north of the freeway, bounded on the
west by Haltom City and on the east by
the new golf course property.
Chairman Schwinger called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PZ 88-17. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 7-0.
Mr. Wood requested that he be allowed
to step down for the next item.
Request of North Richland Hills
Baptist Church to rezone Lots A
and G-2, Calloway Acres Addite n,
3 thru 17 and a portion of ot C,
Parchman Addition, and cts 4Al and
4A2, A.G. Walker Surv ,Abstract 1630
from their present assifications of
C-I Commercial, 7-MF Multi-Family
and U Institu onal to U
Institutio This property is
located uth of Glenview Drive
betwe Vance Road and Scruggs Drive,
40 Vance Road.
Chairman Schwinger opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Mark Wood came forward to represent
the church. He stated they want to
consolidate all property the church
owns into one zoning classification in
anticipation of the upcoming plat.
Mr. Wood stated they now have three
different zonings on the property.
Chairman Schwinger called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
August 25, 1988
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 88-17 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM 1-2 TO R-2
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 110
Ye have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
s~\S.~~ d. ~.)\\kj~Ð
SUSAN L. SCHWINGER, G.C.E.
SLS/ss
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager
Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic -Development Director
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks
Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning
Zoning Review
PZ 88-17
Page
1
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
..
ORDINANCE NO. 1573
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE i "
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-17 the following described property shall
be rezoned from 1-2 to R-2.
BEING a tract of land situated in the Telitha Akers Survey, Abstract 19,
City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being part of that
certain tract conveyed to Ronald O. Campbell by deed recorded in Volume
7998, Page 526, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more
particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at an iron rod at the southeast corner of said Campbell tract;
said point being in the westerly right-of-way line of the St. Louis and
Southwestern Railroad (a 100-foot right-of-way);
THENCE South 89 degrees 27 minutes 08 seconds West, along the south line of
said Campbell tract, a distance of 988.23 feet to an iron rod at the point
of beginning;
THENCE South 89 degrees 27 minutes 08 seconds West, along said south line
of lthe Campbell tract, a distance of 313.77 feet to an iron rod;
THENCE North 00 degrees 34 minutes 05 seconds West, a distance of 2117.23
feet to a point for corner on the south right-oi-way line of Browning
Boulevard (a 60-foot right-of-way);
THENCE North 84 degrees 28 minutes 58 seconds East along said south
right-of-way line of Browning Boulevard, a distance of 115.41 feet to an
angle point;
THENCE North 89 degrees 27 minutes 00 seconds East, along the south line of
Browning Boulevard, a distance of 1075.71 feet to a point for corner;
THENCE Southerly along the western boundary of the 100 year flood plain
limits of Fossil Creek as follows:
South 50 degrees 05 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 22.06 feet;
South 31 degrees 01 minutes 20 seconds East, a distance of 92.13 feet;
South 15 degrees 29 minutes 40 seconds East, a distance of 46.54 feet;
South 02 degrees 11 minutes 44 seconds East, a distance of 133.88
feet;
I Page 2
1_ South 04 degrees 05 minutes 27 seconds East, a distance of 262.33
I feet; ~ f '.
South 05 degrees 06 minutes 33 seconds West, a distance of 151.03
feet;
I South 44 degrees 59 minutes 36 seconds West, a distance of 96.48 feet;
South 60 degrees 28 minutes 58 seconds West, a distance of 93.78 feet;
South 78 degrees 52 minutes 54 seconds West, a distance of 96.83 feet;
I North 72 degrees 25 minutes 12 seconds West, a distance of 55.22 feet;
North 89 degrees 25 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of 227.16
feet;
Sout·h 61 degrees 49 minutes 46 seconds West, a distance of 224.98
I feet;
North 84 degrees 42 minutes 05 seconds West, a distance of 97.12 feet;
North 27 degrees 53 minutes 55 seconds West, a distance of 62.75"feet;
I North 32 degrees 57 minutes 54 seconds Wes t , a distance of 119.30
feet;
South 04 degrees 01 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of 53.84 feet;
South 19 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds East, a distance of 79.05 feet;
I South 43 degrees 41 minutes 46 seconds East, a distance of 56.01 feet;
South 61 degrees 29 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance of 60.70 feet;
South 12 degrees 18 minutes 45 seconds West, a distance of 119.94
I feet;
South 26 degrees 37 minutes 10 seconds Wes t., a distance of 98.42 feet;
South 21 degrees 00 minutes 50 seconds East, a distance of 78.91 feet;
Ie South 16 degrees 28 minutes 06 seconds West, a distance of 398.63
feet;
South 06 degrees 40 minutes 50 seconds East, a distance of 102.21
feet;
I South 34 degrees 01 minutes 21 seconds East, a distance of 148.40
feet;
South 02 degrees 08 minutes 54 seconds West, a distance of 105.24
I feet;
,South 16 degrees 13 minutes 01 seconds West, a distance of 94.48 feet;
South 27 degrees 57 minutes .56 seconds West, a distance of 95.72 feet;
South 26 degrees 35 mintues 21 seconds West, a distance of 35.68 feet
I to the point of beginning and containing 35.3208 acres of land.
This property is located north of Northeast Loop 820 and bounded on the
I west by Haltom City.
I APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER,
1988.
I ~~'
CHA~LANNING ÁND z~.;;;;;;
I
~
1_
SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
..-
Page 3
!'!
t ~
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-88-17 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Economic Development
Department:
.Ubject:
I
10/10/88
- Council Meeting Date:
Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to PZ 88-16
Ordl.nance /11u80 (z.onl.ng Ordinance) Regä.LJ.iuõ Sigh5 Agenda Number:
Ordinance No. 1572
I
I
I
I
An amendment to Ordinance 1080 to include Section XXX, Signs, is presented for City
Council consideration.
There have been numerous work sessions, public meetings and public hearings held over
the past year concerning the proposed Ordinance. They are as follows:
May 16, 1988
A Public Hearing was conducted by the City Council for the purpose
of obtaining public input.
August 11, 1988
A Work Session was conducted with Staff and the Planning and
Zoning Commission to incorporate changes resulting from the Council
hearing.
I
August 25, 1988
A Public Hearing was conducted by the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
I
September 9, 1988
Adoption of the proposed Ordinance by the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
I~The completed Section XXX is submitted by the Planning and Zoning Commission in form,
~content, intent, and spirit of the recommendations received from City Council as a
result of the Public input.
I
I
I
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Ordinance No. 1080 be amended
to include Section XXX, Signs.
The City Council should hold the required Public Hearing and act upon the recommendation
of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Source of Funds:
BondS~G Rev.)
~ Operati Zet
~ Other
. ./ t
Department.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. Finance Director
~I
City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of 1
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1572
BE IT ORDAINED by the City of North Rich1and Hils,' Texas, that Ordinance No 1080
(Zoning Ordinance), adopted January 9, 1984 and as heretofore amended, be and
the same is hereby amended at the following section:
, . .
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
"1.. I
SECTION xxx
SIGNS
30. 1 PURPOSE
The sign regulations as herein established have been made for the purpose of
promoting health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of North
Richland Hills. The Ordinance contains standards regulating the use, size,
location, construction and maintenance of signs. The intent of the regulations
is to protect value within the City of North Richland Hills, to enhance the
beauty of the City and to protect the general public from damage and injury
which may be caused by the unregulated construction of signs.
30.2 DEFINITIONS
30.2.1 AREA OF SIGN
"Area of Sign" shall mean the total area within the extreme
perimeter of the attraction area intended to draw attention to
the sign. The area of the sign with two (2) faces, approximately
opposed, shall be that of the larger face if such condition
prevails; but, if the angle between the planes of the opposing
faces exceeds thirty (30) degrees the total area of both faces
shall be considered the sign area. For multi-sided or circular
signs, the calculation shall include all of the projected area.
30.2.2 BUILDING LINE
"Building Line" shall be the setback lines as established by the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills.
189
·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
30.2.3
30.2.4
30.2.5
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
30.2.6
30.2.7
LIMITED ACCESS FREEWAY
"Limited Access Freeway" shall be deemed to mean a highway to
which the right of access to or from abutting lands is controlled
and restricted by the State Department of Highways and Public
Transportation or the City of North Richland Hills, further, a
"Limited Access Freeway" shall be bordered on each side by access
roads (or right of way for access roads). "Limited Access
Freeways" within the City of North Richland Hills are Interstate
Loop 820 and State Highway 121 (Airport Freeway) only.
GROUND SIGN
"Ground Sign" shall mean a sign not wholly supported on a
building or which has its main supporting structure depending on
the ground for attachment.
PYLON SIGN
"Pylon Sign" shall mean a ground sign erected for the purposes of
identifying the tenants in a major development as defined by this
Section.
MONUMENT SIGN
''Monument Sign" shall mean a ground sign constructed out of
brick, stone or cast concrete supported on concrete foundation.
MAJOR DEVELOPMENT
A "Major Development" shall mean a coordinated commercial
development containing fifty thousand (50,000') square feet of
building(s) area.
190
"~
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
.
30.2.8 PROJECTING SIGN
"Projecting Sign" shall mean a sign suspended from a building or
structure and projecting out therefrom more than one (1') foot.
30.2.9 ROOF SIGN
"Roof Sign" shall mean any sign supported by the roof of building
or placed above the apparent flat roof or eaves of a building as
viewed from any elevation.
30.2.10 "Sign" shall mean a display board, screen, structure, object or
part thereof, used to announce, declare, demonstrate, display or
otherwise advertise and attract the attention of the public to
any business, service or product provided on the premises upon
which sign is placed, other than:
(a) Official notices authorized by a court, public body or public
officer, and,
(b) Directional, warning or information signs authorized by federal,
state or municipal authority.
30.2.11 TEMPORARY SIGN
"Temporary Sign" shall mean a sign, balloon, flag, or other
advertising display constructed of cloth, canvas, light fabric,
cardboard, wall board or light material with or without frames
intended to be displayed for a short period of time only.
Trailer and portable signs are classified "temporary signs".
30.2.12 BANNER SIGN
"Banner Sign" shall mean any sign painted on a strip of cloth,
191
· .
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
30.2.13
30.2.14
30.2.15
30.2.16
canvas or light fabric with or without frames intended to be
displayed for a short period of time only.
WALL SURFACE
"Wall Surfacetf of a building shall mean the general outer surface
not including cornices, bay windows, or other ornamental trim, of
any main exterior wall of the bUilding.
WALL SIGN
"Wall Sign" shall mean any sign painted on, attached to or
projecting from the wall surface of a building (including
permanent window signs and signs on awnings and/or marquees). A
wall sign shall not project above the apparent flat roof or eave
line as viewed from all elevations, or more than one (1') foot
from the surface of the wall.
MARQUEE SIGN
"Marquee Sign1l shall include any hood or awning or permanent
construction projecting from the wall of a building or other
structure containing either permanent or changeable advertising.
DEVELOPMENT
"Development", for the purposes of this section, shall mean any
nonresidential property improvement or properties improved as a
unit with a common parking area that is contiguous to the
development. A shopping center under single or multiple
ownership constitutes a development. A pad site within a
shopping center under separate ownership constitutes a
development. Any single lot, single structure on nonresidential
property constitutes a development.
192
I " .
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
30.2.17 QUALIFIED STREET FRONTAGE
"Qualified Street Frontage" shall mean the width of property
along the street of a commercial or industrial development which
bears the address of the property.
30.2.18 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN
"Traffic Control Sign" shall be any sign used only to control and
direct traffic on private property, e.g., "ENTER" or "EXIT".
30.2.19 ZONING DISTRICT
"Zoning District" shall be the Districts as designated in this
Ordinance.
30.2.20 SIGHT TRIANGLE
"Sight Triangle", for the purposes of this section, shall be an
area of unobstructed visibility on either corner of a street
and/or driveway of at least twenty-five (25') feet in any
direction.
30.3 SIGN PERMIT AND FEES
30.3.1 SIGN PERMIT REQUIRED
(a) No person shall erect, alter, add to a sign or sign structure,
except as provided in this Section and unless a permit for the
same has been issued by the Building Permit Department. Where
signs are illuminated by electric lighting requiring permanent
wiring connections, a separate electrical permit shall be
obtained as required by the Electrical Code of the City.
(b) Temporary signs may be permitted to businesses possessing a
current Certificate of Occupancy.
193
I " .
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
Ie
I
30.3.2 OFFICIAL, QUASI-OFFICIAL AND DIRECTIONAL SIGNS
(a) Nothing herein contained shall prevent the erection, construction
and maintenance of official, traffic, fire and police signs,
signals, devices and markings of the State, City or other
appropriate governmental authorities, nor the posting of notices
required by law. Private and quasi-public signs shall be
prohibited upon public property unless authorized by the City or
other appropriate governmental authority.
(b) Legal notices, telephone and other underground utility warning
signs not exceeding one (1') square foot in size and other
safety signs may be erected without a permit being issued.
(c) Nonadvertising, directional or informational signs less than six
(6') square feet in area may be used without a permit in zoning
Districts R-7MF, 0-1, LR, C-I, C-2, OC, I-I, 1-2 and PD as
designated in this Ordinance.
30.3.3
APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT
Applications for sign permits shall be to the Building Inspection
Office for each development on which the sign or signs are to be
erected and shall contain or have attached thereto the following
information:
(a) Name, address and telephone number of the applicant.
(b) Location of building, structure or lot to which or upon which the
sign or advertising structure is to be attached or erected.
(c) Position of the sign or advertising structure in relation to
nearby buildings or structures.
194
I " .
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
Ie
I
(d) Two (2) blueprints or ink drawings of the plans and
specifications and method of construction and attachment to the
buildings or in the ground.
(e) Copy of stress sheets and calculations showing the structures are
designed for deadload and wind pressure in any direction in the
amount required by the Codes and Ordinances of the City. The
Building Code of the City, which is the current edition of the
Uniform Building Code, shall apply for design of any sign
structure. All structural calculations and design drawings are
to be by a professional engineer registered by the State of
Texas.
(f) Name of person, firm, corporation or association erecting
structure or painting of sign.
(g) Any electrical permit required and issued for such sign.
(h) Detailed plans of all existing signs, including photos and/or
other pertinent data which will aid in the determination to the
site's conformance with this Ordinance.
(i) Such other information as the Building Official shall require to
show full compliance with this and all other Codes and Ordinances
of the City.
(j) In addition to the filing fee, a sign permit fee shall be
collected in accordance with the schedule contained in Section
30.3.8.
30.3.4 NONCONFORMING SIGNS
(a) The lawful use of any sign at the time this Ordinance was adopted
may be continued for a period of five (5) years, after which any
195
I " .
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
sign not in compliance with this Ordinance shall be considered
non-conforming.
(b) Except as this Ordinance may otherwise require, any nonconforming
sign use may be continued in operation on the same land and/or on
the same structure which was in use on the effective date of
these regulations or on the effective date of any amendment by
which the use became nonconforming, but such sign area and/or
structure shall not be changed.
(c) No new permit may be issued for a sign which does not conform to
the provisions of this section.
30.3.5
APPROVAL OF TRAFFIC ENGINEER
If, in the opinion of the Building Official, the plans and
specifications indicate that the sign or sign structure might
interfere with, mislead, or confuse traffic, and if a ground sign
is to be placed on a corner lot and in the opinion of the
Building Official, could create a potential hazard to traffic,
the applicant shall be required to submit a certification from a
qualified Traffic Engineer that the sign location and structure
will not constitute a hazard.
30.3.6
ISSUANCE OF PERMITS
If it shall appear that the proposed sign structure is in
compliance with all the requirements of this Section and all
other Codes and Ordinances of the City and has received approval
where necessary, the Building Department shall then issue the
196
I .. .
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
sign permit. If the work authorized under the permit is not
prosecuted and has not been completed within one hundred eighty
(180) days or a proper extension granted thereto after the date
of issuance the said permit shall become null and void. Issuance
of a sign permit shall be conditioned upon the applicant's
acceptance of any conditions imposed thereon by the City.
30.3.7 UNSAFE AND UNLAWFUL SIGNS
(a) Signs and sign structures including those existing prior to this
Section shall be maintained at all times in a state of good
repair, safe and secure with all braces, bolts, slips, supporting
frame and fastenings free from deterio~ation, termite
infestation, rot, rust or loosening, able to withstand at all
time the wind pressure for which they were originally designed.
(b) No person maintaining any sign, sign structure or billboard shall
fail to keep the ground space within eight (8') feet of the base
of the sign, signboard, billboard, or advertising structure free
and clear of weeds, rubbish and other flammable waste materials.
30.3.8 FILING AND PERMIT FEES
(a) Permanent Signs:
Sign permit fees for permanent signs shall be based on square
footage of the sign in accordance with the following:
SQUARE FOOTAGE
FEE
1 to 50
50 to 100
100 to 200
200 to 300
301 and above
$ 50.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
300.00
197
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
Ie
I
(b) Temporary Signs:
A single filing/permit fee of $25.00 shall be charged for each
application for temporary signs.
30.4 AREA OF SIGNS PERMITTED
30.4.1 SIGNS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
(a) For signing purposes, frontage on private streets that serve as a
public thoroughfare and not just as driveway may be considered as
qualified street frontage.
(b) Anyone (1) development may have one sign which may be a choice
of, a ground sign, Monumment sign, roof sign or projecting sign,
subject to the requirements of Sections 30.4.2 through 30.4.8.
(c) Major Developments, containing fifty thousand (50,000') square
feet or greater in building(s), may have one Pylon Sign
located on one street frontage.
The total amount of signage allowed on a Pylon Sign shall be
calculated at (0.005) square feet of signage for each square foot
of floor area up to a maximum of one thousand (1,000') square
feet of sign area.
Signage for such major development may reach a maximum height of
seventy-five (75') feet if the sign is located on a Controlled
Access Freeway frontage. For all other frontages of such
development the sign may reach a maximum of fifty (50') foot in
height and shall meet the general provisions of this Section.
(d) In Developments with substantial street frontages; i.e., three
hundred fifty (350') linear feet or greater, on two or more
198
I
I.
I
streets, additional ground signs may be permitted for each street
providing that all signs requested must meet the provisions of
Section 30.4.2.
30.4.2 GROUND SIGNS
Ground signs are subject to the following provisions:
(a) One (1) ground or pole sign may be permitted for each three
hundred (300') linear feet or portion thereof of qualified street
frontage with each development in all zoning districts except AG
and all "R" Districts.
(b) The total area of sign permitted for a ground sign shall be
calculated as one (1') square foot of eign for each linear foot
of street frontage, up to a maximum of three hundred (300')
square feet for anyone sign.
(c) The maximum height of any ground sign and supporting structure
shall be twenty-five (25') feet, except that the height of a
ground sign may be increased by adding one (1') foot of height
for each linear foot the sign is set back from the adjacent
property lines, not to exceed an absolute maximum of fifty (50')
feet to the top of the sign; except as noted in Section 30.4.1.
(d) The height of any ground sign may not exceed one-half (1/2) the
shortest linear distance from the location of the sign to the
nearest boundary of any AG or "R" Zoning District.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
il
I
I
I
Ie
I
199
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(e) The sign shall not project over the property line of the
development, right-of-way or over any area within ten (10') feet
of the curb of a public street.
(f) A minimum qualified frontage of fifty (50') feet shall be
required to erect a ground sign.
(g) Permanent attachment to the ground shall be required for all
ground signs, to meet or exceed the requirements of Section
30.3.3 paragraph (e).
30.4.3 MONUMENT SIGNS
Monument Signs are subject to the following provisions:
(a) One (1) monument sign may be permitted with each development in
all zoning districts with exceptions as specified in 30.4.3(b).
(b) Monument signs in "R" districts are limited to main entrances to
"R" subdivisions and/or subject to approval of the Planning and
Zoning Commission at Final Plat submission. Monument signs are
not permitted in flAG" districts.
(c) Monument signs in all zoning districts with exception of "R"
districts shall not exceed six (6') feet in height and shall not
exceed one hundred fifty (150') square feet in sign area.
(d) Monument signs in "R" districts shall not exceed four (4') feet
in height and shall not exceed fifty (50') square feet in sign
area.
30.4.4 BANNER SIGNS
Banner Signs are subject to the following provisions:
(a) One (1) Banner Sign may be permitted with each development
200
I I .
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
without a sign permit in all zoning districts except AG and the
R-I, R-2, R-3, R-6T, and R-B Districts.
(b) The total permitted area for banner signs shall not exceed a
maximum of fifty (50') square feet.
(c) Banner Signs may be attached to a wall surface or facia and
shall not project above the apparent roof or eave line.
(d) Banner Signs shall be attached in such a manner to withstand wind
loads.
(e) Banner Signs which have become torn, tattered or unsightly, shall
be removed.
30.4.5
FREEWAY SIGNS
On properties fronting on the Limited Access Freeways as defined
in Section 30.2 the following additional provisions shall apply
to Ground Signs erected.
(a) The maximum height allowed for a Ground Sign located within
two hundred (200') feet of a limited access Freeway shall be
fifty (50') feet as measured from the location of the sign or
thirty-five (35') feet above the height of the adjacent main
travel lane of the Freeway, whichever is greater.
(b) The maximum size of the Ground Sign which is located within two
hundred (200') feet of the Freeway shall be two (2') square feet
of sign area for each linear foot of Freeway frontage up to a
maximum of four hundred (400') square feet.
30.4.6
GROUND SIGNS FOR AUTO DEALERSHIPS
Ground Signs erected for the purpose of advertising Automobile
201
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Dealerships are subject to the following additional provisions:
(a) One (1) ground or pole sign may be permitted for each distinct
Dealership for each one hundred fifty (150') linear feet or
portion thereof of qualified street frontage with each
development.
(b) The total area of sign permitted for a ground sign shall be
calculated as one (1') square foot of sign for each linear foot
of street frontage, up to a maximum of three hundred (300')
square feet for anyone sign.
(c) A minimum qualified frontage of fifty (50') feet shall be
required to erect a ground sign.
30.4.7
ROOF SIGNS
Roof Signs are permitted under the following provisions:
(a) One (1) roof sign may be permitted with each development on all
zoning districts except AG and the "R" Districts.
(b) Roof signs shall not project horizontally over the edge of the
roof or eave.
(c) The maximum permitted area of roof signage shall be one (1')
square foot of sign area for each linear foot of qualified
frontage not to exceed a maximum of two hundred (200') square
feet.
(d) The height of a roof sign shall not exceed ten (10') feet above
the apparent flat roof or eave line.
(e) Roof sign supports should be architecturally attractive or
screened from view.
202
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
30.4.8
30.4.9
(a)
30.4.10
(a)
(a)
PROJECTING SIGNS
Projecting Signs permitted are subject to the following
provisions:
One (1) projecting sign may be permitted with each development in
all zoning districts except AG and the uR" Districts.
Projecting signs shall not project over the property line of the
development, right-of-way, or over any area within ten (10') feet
of the curb of a public street.
A projecting sign shall not extend more than four (4') feet from
any wall facing.
The total permitted area of a projecting sign shall be measured
as one (1') square foot of sign area for each ~inear foot of
qualified frontage not to exceed a maximum of one hundred (100')
square feet.
THEATER MARQUEES
The maximum permitted area of a Theater Marquee shall be one (I')
square foot of sign area for each linear foot of qualified
frontage not to exceed three hundred (300') square feet of sign
(b)
(c)
(d)
area.
WALL SIGNS COMMERCIAL ZONES
Wall Signs shall be permitted in Commercial or Industrial Zoning
district developments provided the total area of all wall signs
on anyone (1) wall of a building shall not exceed twenty-five
(25%) percent of the total wall area.
203
I
I.
I
(b) Application of the area requirements shall include any valance or
permanent window signs.
(c) A wall sign shall not project above the apparent flat roof or
eave line.
(d) In Service Station/Convenience Store uses when a canopy is
provided over the pump area, wall signs located on the facia area
of the canopy, or suspended on the supports of the canopy, may be
permitted provided that the total area of all signs does not
exceed twenty-five (25%) percent of the total facia area of the
I
I
I
I
I
canopy.
I
30.4.11 SIGNS: RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL ZONES
All signs are prohibited in AG and All uR" Districts except as
follows:
(a) Multi-family developments in R-7MF and R-6T Zoning Districts
shall be allowed wall or ground signs for identification purposes
only for each street frontage. The total area of such signs
shall not exceed fifty (50') square feet.
(b) Ground signs allowed in these Districts shall not exceed a height
of four (4') feet above grade.
(c) Ground signs installed in these Districts shall not be located in
the required sight triangle of a street or driveway inspection.
(d) In "R" Distict developments providing solid masonry screening
along street frontages, approved wall signs may be installed in
such screening walls.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
204
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(e) Wall signs may be used with any residential use in AG and all uR"
Zoning Districts with the exception of R-7MF, with a maximum area
of two (2') square feet per sign. No more than two (2) signs per
occupancy. No permit is required for these signs.
(f) In AG zoning districts, legitimate agricultural businesses or
enterprises shall be permitted ground, roof, projecting or wall
signs in accordance with the restrictions of Sections 30.4.2;
30.4.3; 30.4.6; 30.4.7.; and 30.4.9 with exception that such
signs shall not exceed a total of one hundred (100') square feet
and ground signs shall not exceed fifteen (15') feet in height.
30.4.12 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS
(a) The maximum area of anyone traffic control sign shall be two
(2') square feet.
(b) Traffic control signs are not permitted in AG and all uR"
Districts, with the exception of the R-7MF District.
(c) Traffic control signs shall not include any advertising or
attention attracting lighting, symbols, logos or shapes.
(d) Traffic control signs may pertain to either vehicular or
pedestrian traffic.
30.5 GENERAL PROVISIONS
30.5.1 INTERFERENCE WITH BUILDING REGULATIONS
No sign shall be erected in such a manner that any portion of
its surface or supports will interfere in any way with the free
use of any fire escape, exit, standpipe, or windows or obstruct
any required ventilator or door stairway.
205
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
30.5.2
(a)
30.5.3
(a)
30.5.4
(a)
30.5.5
(a)
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
No sign permit shall be issued for any sign which encroaches upon
or over any City-owned or controlled property unless an
encroachment permit therefor is obtained from the City Councilor
State Agency responsible for such property.
PROJECTION OVER PRIVATE PROPERTY
No sign may project more than six (6") inches from the face of a
building over private property used or intended to be used by the
general public, unless there is a minimum of eight (8') feet
clearance provided from the bottom of the sign to sidewalk or
grade immediately below the sign, or a. minimum of fourteen (14')
feet clearance from the bottom of the sign to a vehicular
trafficway immediately below the sign.
MEMORIAL SIGNS AND HISTORICAL TABLETS
Nothing herein contained shall prevent the City Council from
granting special permits on such terms as it may deem proper, for
signs denoting properties or buildings which may have historical
or memorial significance to the community. Nor shall the City
Council be restricted from authorizing signs as they may
deem appropriate to advertise patriotic, special events or
special projects of general public interest taking place within
the boundaries of the City.
VEHICLE ADVERTISING
The intent of this Section is to create equal and just vehicle
advertising. Vehicles may display signage in accordance with
Texas Motor Safety Laws with the following additional guidelines.
206
.. . . .
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(b) Signs must be permanently attached to vehicles by either being
painted, bolted, screwed or magnetically fixed.
(c) Cloth or other light materials secured with rubber, rope, string,
tape, or other similar adhesives shall not be permitted.
(d) No sign or advertising shall be erected or attached to any
vehicle except for those signs which are painted directly or
mounted flush to the surface or mounted directly on the °roof of
the vehicle.
(e) No roof mounted signs shall project more than twelve (12") inches
above the roof of the vehicle.
(f) All vehicles which have signs or advertising shall be in working
order and shall be in compliance with all applicable vehicle
safety laws when signs are in place. All such vehicles shall
have current registration and inspection stickers and shall be
regularly used for transportation purposes.
30.5.6
LIGHTING
(a) Signs may be illuminated or non-illuminated. Illumination may be
either by internal, internal-indirect or indirect lighting as
defined below. Lighting shall be so installed as to avoid any
glare or reflection into adjacent property, or onto a street or
alley to create a traffic hazard.
(b) When not necessary to satisfy security purposes, it is suggested
that lighting be turned off as soon after business hours as is
reasonable, especially where signs are in close proximity to
residential areas.
207
I ' .
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(c) "Internal lighting" shall mean a source of illumination entirely
within the sign which makes the contents of the sign visible at
night by means of the light being transmitted through a
translucent material but wherein the source of the illumination
is not visible.
(d) "Internal-indirect lighting" shall mean a source of illumination
entirely within the sign (generally a free-standing letter) which
makes the sign visible at night by means of lighting the
background upon which the free-standing character is mounted.
The character itself shall be opaque, and thus will be
silhouetted against the background. The source of the
illumination shall not be visible.
(e) "Indirect lighting" shall mean a source of external illumination
located a distance away from the sign, which lights the sign, but
which itself is not visible to persons viewing the sign from any
normal position of view.
30.5.7 ROTATING, MOVING, FLASHING, CHANGING OR BLINKING, BILLBOARD SIGNS
(a) Rotating, search lights, flashing, blinking, or billboard signs
shall not be permitted.
30.5.8 MESSAGE SIGNS
(a) Message signs containing changeable messages, i.e., Time and
Temperature, etc, may be permitted on an individual basis by
submittal of a request to the Building Official.
208
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
. .
30.6 TEMPORARY SIGNS
30.6.1 EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS SECTION:
(a) No person may erect a temporary sign as defined in Section
30.2.10 without a permit from the Building Inspection Department.
(b) No temporary or portable sign shall be erected or placed to
advertise a business, industry or pursuit except on the premises
on which the referenced business, industry or pursuit is
conducted.
(c) All temporary type fragile displays or signage that might
separate from itself or become separated from either line under
the guidelines of the 1988 Uniform Building Code, Section 23-4,
Figure 4, Page 137 shall not be allowed. These restrictions are
to protect the general public from flying debris generated by
dismembered displays.
(d) No temporary or portable sign shall be attached to any utility
pole, light pole, or traffic control sign or pole,
(e) The complete sign package must be removed at termination of the
permit. Removal of letters from the sign board does not abate a
non-permitted sign.
(f) No temporary sign shall be displayed for more than thirty (30)
days per permit received.
(g) A maximum of thre·e (3) temporary sign permits per year shall be
issued to anyone business, industry, or pursuit. However
consecutive permitting is not allowed.
(h) Temporary signs shall not exceed fifty (50') square feet in area.
209
· ' '. .
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(i) No temporary or portable sign shall be erected or placed within
fifteen (15') feet of the curb or street except for those which
may be mounted on the wall of a building which is closer than
fifteen (15') feet to the curb or street.
(j) No temporary or portable sign may be erected or placed in any
location that constitutes a safety or traffic hazard.
(k) No temporary or portable sign may be erected or placed in a
fire zone, fire lane, handicap parking area or required loading
zone.
(1) No temporary or portable sign may be placed in any location that
blocks view from any permitted permanent signage.
(m) Temporary or portable signs shall be place at least one hundred
(100')feet apart.
(n) Non-conforming temporary signs or temporary signs without permits
may be impounded by the City forty-eight (48) hours after notice
is given to the owner or party responsible for the sign.
(0) Each temporary sign may advertise one or more individual
businesses. However, for each business advertised a separate
permit fee will be required and each business will be charged
for the advertisement against its allotted three (3) permits per
year as stated in Subsection (g).
(p) Trailer and portable signs shall bear in letters of not less than
one (1) inch in height the company name of the sign owner and
telephone number on each unit. This information must be current.
210
, '
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
Any sign not containing current information shall be classified
as non-conforming signs and may be impounded by the City
forty-eight (48) hours after notice is given to the owner or
party responsible for the sign.
30.6.2
REAL ESTATE SIGNS
Permits shall not be required for the following types of real estate
signs:
(a) One (1) temporary sign announcing the offering for sale or rental
of individually platted residential or commercial property on
which it is placed shall be allowed in any District and may be
placed in any yard. Such sign shall not exceed five (5') square
feet in area. Such sign shall be removed within one (1) week
following the close of a sale or lease.
(b) On nonresidential commercial property where there is a business
building, one (1) temporary unlighted sign offering all or a
portion of the same sale or rental shall be allowed flat against
any wall of the business building. Such sign shall be no taller
than the wall and shall have an area no larger than one hundred
(100') square feet. Such sign shall be removed within one (1)
week following the close of a sale or lease.
(c) On undeveloped property, temporary unlighted signs offering the
same for sale or lease shall be allowed. Such signs shall be
located at least twenty-five (25') feet behind any curb or ten
(10') feet behind any property line, whichever is greater; and
211
¡ .
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
shall not exceed fifteen (15') feet in height. The total area of
all sign message surfaces of all such signs shall not exceed one
(1') square foot per one (1') linear foot of street frontage of
the property for sale or one hundred (100') square feet on each
street fronting the property; whichever is smaller. Only one (1)
sign per street frontage shall be permitted. Each sign shall be
removed within one (1) week following the close of the sale or
lease.
30.6.3
WEEKEND BUILDERS ADVERTISING
The City of North Richland Hills's policy for weekend advertising, as
expressed in this Ordinance is extended to homebuilders for the
purpose of guiding the weekend motoring public to available
residential properties in North Richland Hills. The policy is
intended as a benefit also to the buying public. These provisions are
designed to allow temporary directional signs without resulting in an
excess that may prove offensive to others of the public. The policy
should also serve as "connnon sense" guidelines in places where direct
application is unclear.
(a) Registration: In order for a bUilder/developer to be eligible
to participate in this weekend advertisement he must be
registered with the Building Inspection Office.
An annual fee of $50.00 must be paid by each builder/developer
wishing to advertise his homes for sale under these provisions.
Such annual fee must be paid and/or renewed during the month of
January of each year.
212
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(b) Schedule: Signs will be allowed between 12 PM Friday and 12 PM
Monday. A holiday falling on Friday or Monday will be considered
part of the weekend.
(c) Sign Size: Signs shall not exceed twenty-four (24") inches by
thirty (30") inches in size, not to exceed three (3') feet above
grade.
(d) Spacing of Signs: A minimum of thirty (30') feet must be held
between all signs, and signs for one advertiser must be at least
two hundred (200') feet apart.
(e) Sign Location: Individual sign locations shall adhere to the
following criteria.
(1) No closer than forty (40') feet to a street intersection or
median opening.
(2) Signs may be placed in City right of way, but no closer than
three (3') feet from the edge of the sign to the street curb
or edge of pavement. Signs should not encroach either the
sidewalks or the street.
(3) No sign shall be placed in a "visibility triangle" as
defined in this section. Generally, if a sign is close to
blocking motorist visibility, it should be removed.
(4) No signs should be placed further than three (3) miles from
the subject property.
(f) Sign Construction and Criteria: Signs should be rigid, two (2)
dimensional displays that advertise new residential property,
"For Sale" only, (not lease property), guiding the motorists to a
specific location in North Richland Hills.
213
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
These are the guidelines under which this policy will be administered, relating
particularly to the weekend/motoring/home-buying customer. It is the
responsibility of the builder to secure permission of the adjacent property
owner for placement of the signs on private property. This policy does not
grant unlimited access and use of the City right-of-way.
Violations of this policy will be cause for confiscation of the signs. Any
signs which are confiscated by the Code Enforcement Officer may be reclaimed by
the owner of such sign, but each sign so confiscated will be subject to a
redemption fee of $5.00 per sign. If signs remain unreclaimed for a period of
thirty (30) days, the City will dispose of such signs as may be appropriate.
Excessive general violations may require that the 'policy be suspended for a
period of time. The Building Official shall notify the Ci ty Council in the
event that the suspension of this policy is put into effect indicating the
causes and the period of the suspension. All builders are offered the use of
these provisions equally. In so doing, the City asks that the builders aid in
maintaining a neat and orderly appearance throughout all of North Richland
Hills.
30.6.4
SUBDIVISION/NEW DEVELOPMENT SIGNS
(a) Subdivision/New Development Signs are to be used for the
identification of a new project, such as a subdivision, where
real property is being sold for the first time to a user, new
buildings, public projects and the like. These signs are not
permanent but may be required for a longer period of time than
most temporary signs.
214
I
I.
I
(b) Each subdivision and/or development shall be permitted to install
one on-site sign located on the property owned by the advertiser
in the same zoning district as the project and one off-site sign
which may be located in' any Commercial, Industrial, or Office
District or on unplatted vacant property.
(c) A sign permit is required for each subdivision or new development
sign erected in accordance with these provisions.
(d) Permits for such signs shall be issued for a period of one (1)
year or to completion of the project, whichever occurs first. A
second permit allowing an additional of one (1) year may be
granted by the Building Official upon payment of a renewal fee
equal to the original permit fee and conformance with the
following requirements:
(1) A substantial portion of the development is not yet
completed.
(2) If the development has building activity in progress,
(3) If the sign is relocated to a portion of the development
which is not offensive to the completed portion of the
development.
(e) These signs shall not exceed fifteen (15') feet in height and
shall be no larger than one hundred fifty (150') square feet in
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
size.
(f) Such signs shall be located at least twenty-five (25') feet
behind the curb of the street and shall not be in violation of
any visibility triangle.
215
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(g)
On larger vacant tracts where more than one project or
development may be advertised, no two signs may be closer than
two hundred (200') feet apart.
TRADE CONSTRUCTION SIGNS
30.6.5
(a)
Trade Construction signs may be approved at the discretion of the
Building Official to advertise the various construction trades on
any construction site.
(b)
Trade construction signs must be removed prior to the issuance of
a Certificate of Occupancy.
30.6.6
POLITICAL SIGNS
(a) Temporary, unlighted, political signs ·(including portable or
trailer signs) supporting an announced candidate, a party or an
issue shall be allowed in any district without a sign permit.
(b) Political signs shall not be located on any utility, light,
traffic signal or sign pole.
(c) Political signs are permitted for a period of thirty (30) days
prior to local or county elections, sixty (60) days prior to a
state election and ninety (90) days prior to a national election.
All political signs shall be removed no later than seven (7)
days after the election or after the termination of candidacy,
whichever occurs first.
(d) In AG and all "R" zoning districts, political signs shall not
have a height of more than three (3') feet above grade. In other
districts, the height shall not exceed six (6') feet above grade.
216
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
30.6.7
(a)
30.6.8
(a)
(e)
In AG and all "R" districts, political signs shall not exceed
five (5') square feet.
In all zoning districts, political signs shall not be located to
cause a safety or traffic hazard.
(f)
CIVIC AND RELIGIOUS SIGNS
(b)
Temporary signs advertising public school, religious events of
public schools and religious organizations may be erected or
placed on their property after obtaining a permit from the
Building Department. Such permit will be at no cost. A maximum
of two permits may be issued at anyone time.
Temporary signs advertising public school, civic or religious
events of public school, civic or religious organizations may be
placed on any private property with the permission of the owner.
Such off-site signs are required to be permitted.
Signs announcing civic or religious events of wide-spread
community interest may be erected on public property or right-
of-way with special permission of the City Council. Such signs
will be permitted by the Building Department at no cost. Such
signs shall be located so as not to present a safety or traffic
hazard.
(c)
GARAGE SALE SIGNS
Temporary, unligh.ted signs announcing the holding of a sale of
household possessions at a place of residence shall be allowed in
any zoning district without permit.
217
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(b)
Garage 'sale signs shall be located on private property only.
Garage sale signs shall not be permitted on any public property
or right-of-way, nor on any utility, light, traffic signal or
sign pole.
(c) Sign size shall not exceed six (6') square feet.
(d) Signs shall not be posted more than five (5) days prior to the
beginning of the sale and shall be removed within twenty-four
(24) hours following the end of the sale.
30.7 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
30.7.1 The construction of all signs shall comply with the structural
requirements of the City Building Code and the current edition of
the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City.
Structural design shall be by professional engineer registered by
the State of Texas.
30.7.2 The design of sign supports and structure shall be compatible
with and in harmony with the surrounding buildings and
structures.
30.8 OBNOXIOUS SIGNS EXPLOITING SEX PROHIBITED
30.8.1 VISUAL DEPICTION OF SEXUAL AREAS OF HUMAN FORM PROHIBITED.
(a) No sign or signs as defined in this Ordinance, to include any
temporary sign, which in whole or in part, depicts the human form
in such a manner that the areas of the buttocks, or the genitals,
or the pubic area, or any portions of the female breast below the
top of the nipple, are depicted as not covered with opaque
218
( .
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
30.8.2
(a)
30.8.3
(a)
30.8.4
(a)
clothing shall be maintained, erected, or placed upon or adjacent
to the outside of any building where it is visible from public
streets or from adjacent buildings or premises.
USE OF THE WORDS CONNOTING EROTIC ENTERTAINMENT PROHIBITED.
(b)
No sign or signs, as defined in this Ordinance, including any
temporary signs, which in whole or part advertise any "topless",
"bottomless", "naked", or words of like import, except that the
words "adult entertainment" or "adult shows" will be permissible,
shall be maintained, erected, or placed upon or adjacent to the
outside of any building where it is visible from public streets
or from adjacent buildings or premises.
DISPLAY OF OFFENSIVE SIGNS A PUBLIC NUISANCE.
Any sign which is in violation of Sections 30.8.1 or 30.8.2 is
declared a public nuisance.
ABATEMENT
Any temporary sign or signs in violation of Section XXX shall be
abated within twenty-four (24) hours after notice has been given
in writing to abate the sign or signs. Any sign which involves
letters placed on a marquee is considered a temporary sign for
purposes of this Section.
Any sign or signs in violation of Section XXX which can be
covered or painted over in such a manner so the sign will comply
with this Section and which do not require removal or mechanical
or electrical alterations, the whole or part of the sign shall be
219
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
30.8.5
(a)
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
30.8.6
(a)
(c)
covered or painted within twenty-four (24) hours after written
notice has been given in writing to abate the sign or signs.
Signs in violation of Section XXX which require mechanical or
electrical alteration of all or part of the sign or require the
removal of part or all of the sign in order to comply with this
Section shall be altered or removed within'seven (7) days after
service of written notice to abate the sign or signs.
NOTICE TO ABATE
The City Manager or the Building Official or one of their
designees are authorized to prepare and deliver notice to abate
any sign or signs in violation of Section XXX.
Notice is deemed to be served for the purpose of Section XXX if
delivered to any person who is an owner or lessee of the premises
on which the sign or signs are located or to any officer of any
corporation or any partner of a partnership which is operating a
business on the premises on which the sign or signs are located
which violates Section XXX and which is responsible for the sign
or signs in violation of this Section.
VIOLATION A MISDEMEANOR
(b)
Any person, firm, or corporation which is found to be in
violation of the provisions of Section XXX shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and on conviction may be punished by fine of not
less than ($50) dollars nor more than one thousand ($1000)
dollars, and each day such violation occurs shall be deemed a
separate offense.
220
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
30.9 ADMINISTRATION
The Building Official shall administer Section XXX of this Ordinance.
30.10 ENFORCEMENT
30.10.1
(a)
(b)
ENFORCEMENT
If the Building Official or other person he/she may appoint shall
find that any sign or other advertising structure regulated
herein is unsafe or insecure, or is a menace to the public, or
has been constructed or erected or is being maintained in
violation of the approved sign permit or provisions of this
Section, the permittee or owner thereof shall be given written
notice of the violation.
If the permittee or owner fails to remove or alter the structure
so as to comply with the standards herein set forth within ten
(10) days after such notice, such sign or advertising structure
may be removed or altered to comply by the City of North Richland
Hills at the expense of the permittee and/or owner of the
property upon which it is located.
The Building Official shall refuse to issue any subsequent
building, electrical, plumbing or mechanical permits for the
property on which the offending sign was located if any owner or
permittee shall refuse to pay the costs so assessed.
The Building Official may cause any sign or other advertising
structure which is in immediate peril to persons or property to
(c)
(d)
221
I' ,
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
be removed; by giving notice to the owner or permittee at least
forty-eight (48) hours in advance.
(e) The Building Official or other person he/she may appoint may
cause any illegal temporary sign, to be removed within
twenty-four (24) hours.
30.10.2 RIGHT OF ENTRY
(a) Upon presentation of proper credentials, the Building Official or
his duly authorized representative may enter at reasonable times,
any buildings, structures or premises in the City to perform any
duties imposed upon him by Section XXX.
30.11 ABATEMENT OF NONCONFORMING SIGNS
30.11.1 TIME PERIOD
A period of ten (10) years subsequent to the effective date of this
Ordinance is hereby established for the abatement of signs legally
existing prior to the said date but such signs which have become
nonconforming under the terms of this Section or previous Ordinances
adopted since the effective date noted. Nothing contained within this
provision shall apply to signs illegally erected. Such illegally
erected signs are subject to immediate abatement.
30.11.2
WALL SIGNS
Nonconforming painted wall signs are subject, in addition to the
abatement procedures set forth, to immediate abatement when the
business occupying the premises changes to a different business or
different owner necessitating repainting of the said sign.
222
'. .
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
30.11.3 APPEAL
Abatement periods established herein are subject to appeal before the
Zoning Board of Adjustment.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th
OF Sept ember ~ 1988 r-.:;:;;--,ea
DAY
,
~
Commission
~-/.\::f\~ ~
Secretary Planning arid ZOrling·- ommission
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS
DAY OF
, 1988.
ATTEST:
Mayor
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
223
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Economic Development 10/10/88
Council Meeting Date:
Request of Several Homeowners to Replat Several PS 88-7
LOLS on che Sout:h S1-de of labor 51:reet. LuL::) 10R.-llR, Agen~a Number:
Block 9, Lots lR-9R, Block 6, Haltom Ranchland Additioñ, '
and Lots 3R-5R, and 7R, Block 4, Diamond Loch North Addition.
I
I
Subject:
I
I
This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lots lOR and llR, Block 9,
Lots lR through 9R, Block 6, Haltom Ranchland Addition, and Lots 3R through 5R and 7R,
Block 4, Diamond Loch North Addition. The subject property is a series of existing
residential lots located on the south side of Tabor Street between Rufe Snow Drive and
Diamond Loch Drive.
I
The purpose for the proposed replat is to combine the existing lots along Tabor Street
with the unplatted property to the rear of the lots which is owned by the applicants
respectively. Several times in the recent past one of the property owners has proposed
to make use of the unplatted portion of his property to construct a garage, storage
building, and etc. In each case the Staff had to inform the applicant that the property
-must be platted in order for permits to be issued. In an effort to resolve this issue
finally for all the involved parties, the City Council agreed that if a cooperative
platting could be submitted by all the affected property owners the filing fees for the
plat application would be waived. The plat under consideration covers all of the
remaining lots in the two block area with the exception of one vacant lot, the two
individual lots which have been previously platted, and the lots which have frontage on
Rufe ~now Drive where the owner chose not to participate in this platting.
I
I
I
I e All
of the Staff comments have been satisfactorily answered.
I
I
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Plat Application PS 88-7 requesting replat
of Lots lOR and llR, Block 9, Lots lR through 9R, Block 6, Haltom Ranchland Addition,
and Lots 3R through 5R and 7R, Block 4, Diamond Loch North Addition as submitted.
The Commission and the Staff recommend the approval of the Replat Request by the City
Council.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Bud et
I e Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~t~
, Finance Director
nt Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
City Manager
Page 1 of
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
('
~v
~\-t> 1- 2
,'v
~
F7n-aTy-aTn
11 a .......
,..'
I
Page 2
P & Z Minutes
June 23, 1988
(
(
I_
I
I
I
Chairman Tucker said there
concerns regarding the set
the cuI de sac lots, but said this
could be checked ou efore approval
of the final
PS 88-6
APPROVED PHASE I
ield made the motion to
rove Phase I of the preliminary
plat and hold the approval of the
other phases until the decision is
made on the golf course. He said the
balance of this plat would need to
come back before this Commission for
approval. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0.
I
I
I
2.
PS 88-7
Request of several homeowners to
replat several lots on Tabor Street.
The lots are: Lots 10R-IIR, Block 9,
Lots IR-9R, Block 6, Haltom Ranchland
Addition, and Lots 3R-5R, & 7R, Block
4, Diamond Loch North Addition.
I
1_
I
I
I
I
I
Chairman Tucker stated this replat was
initiated by the City Council. He
said the Council waived the City Fees
for this group of homeowners to get
together and plat the vacant lots
behind their houses.
Chairman Tucker opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Pete Delgado, 6632 Tabor, came
forward. He asked what effect would
the easement have running across the
middle of their lots.
I
I
I_
I
Mr. Royston said you could not build
on it.
Mr. Delgado asked what if a tornado
came through.
Mr. Royston said the utility easement
would remain the same; it runs through
the property now.
I
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
June 23, 1988
(
(
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
,..
Mr. Delgado said he does not object to
the plat, he just wanted to bring out
about the utility easement.
Chairman Tucker called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to
please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
PS 88-7
APPROVED
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 88-7. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
7-0.
I
Ie
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:40 P. M.
Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission
1
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
ESTABLISHED 1880
GAREY W. GILLEY
DON W. HICKEY
C. RICHARD DAVIS. JR.
STEPHEN H. ROBERSON
BROOKES BAKER SURVEYORS
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
TITLE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING
BROOKES BAKER BUILDING - 511 E. BLUFF STREET
817 - 335 -7151
METRO 429-6119
FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76102-2293
~
June 16, 1988
Ms. Wanda Calvert
Planning & Zoning Commission
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
RE:
PS-88-7
Dear Ms. Calvert:
BROOKES BAKER (1902-1955)
JOHN F. BAKER (1902-1985)
S. J. BAKER. CONSULTANT
FRED M. MORRIS. CONSULTANT
I have reviewed comments from Kevin B. Miller, P.E. dated June
13, 1988 and offer the following:
1. Drainage easement added.
2. We will acquire volume and page numbers on newly
recorded deeds from county when they have are
available. They will be complete prior to final
recording.
3. Acreage has been added.
4. Signature block has been added.
5. Vicinity map added.
6. "Final Plat" has been added.
7. Existing easements and "Beginning" points added.
Additional prints are included for the Commission's review.
If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
BROOKES BAKER SURVEYORS
~ #f2
Stephen H. Roberson
SHR:bam
enclosure, as stated
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
City of Xrth Richland Hills, Texas
1'!
June 13, 1988
REF: PWM-0050-88
Memo to: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Kevin B. Miller, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works
Subject: PS 88-7; Final Plat of DIAMOND LOCH NORTH - Block 4
and HALTOM RANCHLAND ADDITION - Blocks 6 & 9
I have reviewed the above referenced documents and offer the following
comments.
1. Since E£ construction is planned at this time, a drainage study will not
be requested at this time. The Drainage Master Plan indicates the need for
future improvements to extend from Glenview Drive n~rth on Lariat Trail to
Briley Drive. A fifteen feet drainage easement between Lot l-R, Block 6 and
Lot ll-R, Block 9 of Haltom Ranchland Addition will be required to accommodate
future drainage appurtenances.
2. The Metes and Bounds description has 6 blanks where information is still
required. These blanks have been circled on the attached print.
3. There are three separate descriptions which should all list the total
acreage defined.
4. Add signature blocks as indicated to more clearly define which signatures
are for which addition.
5. Add Vicinity Map as outlined in Subdivision Ordinance.
6. Add term "FINAL PLAT of" to title block as indicated.
7. Show existing easements and "Beginning" points as indicated.
%~~~
Kevin B. Miller, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works
Ids
cc: Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning
Mr. Greg Dickens, 'Director of Public Works
Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Asst. City Manager
(817) 281.Q04117301 N.E. LOOP 8201P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76180
I
I Department:
&ubject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Economic Development
10/10/88
- Council Meeting Date:
"
Request of Immanuel Lutheran Church for Variance from PS 88-21
Subdivision Ordinance fur TCCH..:l A, Bludt 7, HulIJay Agenda Number:
Heights Addition. .
This variance request is presented on the Church property Tract A, Block 7, Holiday
Heights Addition. The property is located at 7321 Lola Drive. The applicant is
requesting that a variance be granted allowing the construction of a 4,500 square foot
Educational Building without making improvements to Calloway Branch at this time.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission after reviewing the letter from Public Works, dated
September 20, 1988, expressing no objection, recommended approval of granting a variance
for this project only. The Council should act on the recommendation of the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budg
e Other
l
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
9~~JA !iix~~
ent Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 2 ~
P & Z Minutes
September 22, 1988
(
2. PS 88-18
This was added to the motion.
The motion carried 7-0.
Request of Mildred Kid
preliminary plat of t
Kidwell Additio
1,
PS 88-18
APPROVED
e the motion to approve
subject to the Engineer's
ts.
seconded by Mr.
and the motion carried 7-0.
3. PS 88-19
Request of Mildred Kidwell for final
plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Kidwell
Addition.
Mr. Barfield made the motion to table
PS 88-19 until such time as the
Engineer's comments are addressed.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood
and the motion carried 7-0.
4. PS 88-21
Consideration of a variance request
from Immanuel Lutheran Church on Tract
A, Block 7, Holiday Heights Addition
regarding Calloway Branch Creek.
Mr. Bowen stated the Commission has a
letter from the Assistant Director of
Public Works which states they do not
have any objection to the additional
building at this time.
PS 88-21
APPROVED
Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve
PS 88-21 for this addition only; for
this single project.
This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood
and the motion carried 7-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
City of JXðrth Richland Hills., Texas
September 20, 1988
REF: P\~1-009l-88
Memo to: Planning & Zoning Commission
From:
Kevin B. Miller, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities
RE:
PS 88-21; Channel Improvements for HOLIDAY HEIGHTS
ADDITION - Tract A, Block 7
The above referenced site is located adjacent to a portion of Calloway
Branch which is currently unimproved. The Five Year Capital Improvements
Project Plan proposes to improve the channel south of this site sometime
in the future. The portion of the channel immediately north of this site
is not currently in the Five Year Plan.
Due to the location of the site, the magnitude of the proposed on site
construction and the condition of the existing channel, Public Works is
not opposed to granting the owner a variance to the City Ordinances
which would allow the owner to make no channel improvements at this time.
Public Works would however retain the right to review any and all future
requests for building permits.
~~6?~~
~evin B. Miller, P.E.
Assistant Director Public Works/Utilities
KBM/ds
cc: Mr. Greg Dickens, Director of Public Works/Utilities
Immanuel Lutheran Church
(817) 281.Q04117301 N.E. lOOP 8201P.O. BOX 18809/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76180
I ---
---
:::-- ~ ==
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~-
Immanuel Luthtf an Church & School
7321 Lola Drive
Fort Worth, TX 76118
Phone (817) 281-6195
Bible Class 9:30 A.M.
Sunday Worship 10:30 A.M.
Rev. M.F. Wagenknecht
September 12, 1988
Zoning and Planning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 NE Loop 820
Attn: Mr. George Tucker
Dear Mr. Tucker,
By way of this letter, Immanuel Ev. Lutheran Church
is hereby requesting a variance to the requirement of
upgrading the Calloway Branch Creek drainage ravine
located on our property. To require our congregation
to absorb such cost would mean that our current build-
ing project would be impossible as the improvement
would be cost prohibitive.
To assist you in your deliberations, please find
attached the following:
1. A blueprint òf our initial site plan illustrat-
ing elevations (exhibit A), and
2. A revised blueprint to meet the city fire codes
(widening of the turnaround area) as well as
moving of parking spaces to elude the flood plain.
Correspondence may be made directly with me, or
with Pastor Wagenknecht. May the Lord grant you wisdom
in your deliberations.
Yours in Christ,
-:7-Ä..-f/rj:x /./ I~;~,
/T?'~ V( /1 J Y I ..~
Thomas H. Miller
Building Committee Chairman
Immanuel Ev. Lutheran Church
Home Phone 281-9574
or"","'~"<'" '
1°
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Department: Public Works _ Council Meeting Date: 10/10 /RR
.ubject: Amendment to Water Service Contract with the City of Agenda Number: GN 88-97
II Fort Worth - Ordinance No. 1568
I
The attached proposed ordinance will amend the March 19, 1964 water service contract
with the City of Fort Worth for the second time. The first amendment was passed by
the Council on September 28, 1987 as Ordinance No. 1491. The intent of the first
amendment was to set the wholesale water rates for a one year period during which a
new wholesale water contract was to be negotiated by the Wholesale Water Customers
with the City of Fort Worth. The renegotiations have not yet rendered an acceptable
contract" so a second amendment is required to again set the wholesale water rates
for another year.
I
I
I
The proposed rates in the attached ordinance reflect an approximate 11% increase over
last year's rates. The alternative per the existing contract is for the City of
Fort Worth to put up a level 5 year rate. An increase of approximately 16% would
be required to achieve a 5 year set wholesale water rate with only pass-through
raw water charge increases by the Tarrant County'Water Supply and Control District
No.1 being necessary.
I
e
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 1568 adopting a second amendment to the
City of Fort Worth's City Secretary Contract No. 4947 as described above.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
e Othe
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/ A
Sufficient Funds Available
d/¡4~
Head Signatur City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Fmance Director
Paqe 1 of
1
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
Ie
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1568
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
'~\
1.
The ~1ayor be, and is hereby, authorized to execute
the attached document entitled "Second Amendment to City
Secretary Contract No. 4947" as the act and deed of this City.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day of October, 1988.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
SECOND AMENDMENT TO CITY SECRETARY CONTRACT NO. 1568
This agreement entered into this 10th day of October
between the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills.
, 1988, by and
WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills entered
into a contract for water service dated March 19, 1964, same being City of Fort
Worth City Secretary Contract No. 4947; and
WHEREAS, on September 28, 1987, the City of Fort Worth and City of North
Richland Hills entered into an amendent of City of Fort Worth City Secretary
Contract No. 4947, same being City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No.
16112; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills are
desirous of amending said City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract Numbers
4947 and 16112;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Fort Worth and City of North Richland Hills
agree as follows:
1.
Paragraph 5, Section 38, of City of Fort Worth City Secretary Contract No.
16112 is hereby amended and, after having been so amended, shall read as
follows:
"b. Commodity Charge and Rates of Use Charge.
"Except for fiscal year 1988-1989, the rate shall be reviewed and
adjusted every three (3) years beginning in fiscal year 1989-1990. The cost
related to the projection and transmission function of distributing treated
water to the Fort Worth city limits in wholesale quantities plus a service
-1-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
charge shall be determined in accordance with the methods herein. Such costs
shall be projected through the City of Fort Worth fiscal year 1991 to establish
the fair rate for water to be charged during the period October 1, 1989, to
September 30, 1992. The adjusted rate shall be made effective October 1, 1989.
A similar review and rate adjustment shall be made for each succeeding three
year period for the term of this contract. For the rates for the three (3)
years beginning 1989-1990, the Touche Ross Study dated September, 1987, and
computer model included therewith shall be used by Fort Worth to project the
rates to be charged for said three (3) year period.
The following rates are hereby established for the period October 1, 1988.
to September 30, 1989:
Volume Rates (Per 1000 gal.)
Treatment, Pumping and Transmission
Raw Water
Total Volume Rate
OUTSIDE
DISTRICT
$.3183
$.6191
$.9374
Maximum Day Rate
(Per MGD in excess of average day)
$62,974
Maximum Hour Rate
(Per MGD in excess of maximum day)
$29,450
Meter Charge ($/meter/month)
$25
2.
Every other term, condition and/or covenant contained in City of Fort Worth
City Secretary Contract Numbers 4947 and 16112 not amended hereby shall be
unaffected hereby and shall continue in full force and effect.
-2-
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ATTEST:
Ci ty Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney
Date:
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
Date:
-3-
CITY OF FORT WORTH
By:
Assistant City Manager
By:
~.i "';;:::. ~-;"''0'"'-.~
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Department:
-SUbject:
I
I
I
I
Economic Development
- Council Meeting Date:
10/10/88
Contract for Golf Course Engineering
GN 88-98
Agenda Number:
We have sent seven Requests for Proposals for Engineering Services on the Golf Course.
These will be received at City Hall Friday afternoon and evaluated by a committee of six
composed of the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and four Staff members. This group will have a
recommendation of a firm ready for Council approval on Monday.
RECOMMENDATION:
Award contract to firm recommended by the Committee.
I
¡e
I
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~ Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
A Operating Budget
. Other
I
...~
t Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
f3~Á~~
, Finance Director
City Manager
Page 1 of
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Economic Development
Department:
Subject:
Contract for Golf Course Engineering
10/10/88
- Council Meeting Date:
GN 88-98
Agenda Number:
The Committee described in the original cover sheet for this item has evaluated the
proposals submitted by seven engineering firms, which were pre-qualified as competent to
accomplish the scope of work as defined. After the evaluation, a numerical ranking was
assigned and it is as follows:
1. Rady and Associates
2. Freese and Nichols
3. Albert H. Halff Associates
4. Carter & Burgess, Inc.
5. Knowlton, English, Flowers, Inc (Tie)
6. Yandell & Hiller (Tie)
7. Worrell & Associates
The amount budgeted for these services is $50,000.
I
RECOMMENDATION:
4IÞlt is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate a
contract for Engineering Services , beginning with Rady & Associates, and present the
contract for approval by the City Council.
~
I
I
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budg ___
_ Other jÎ I
UI ~ ~
~ ' &6part ~t Head Signature
· CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
/(U~
. Finance Director
City Manager
Page 1 of
1
~'·,'"e",.."",''',,< ..,""""""
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Finance
ubject:
Utility Lockbox Services/Printing Services
- 10/10/88
- Council Meeting Date:
GN 88-99
Agenda Number:
In an infonnal report to the Mayor and City Council suhnitted June 27, 1988, the Lockbox
Concept for Utility and Tax receipts was presented for consideration. At that t:i.rœ, the
Staff was directed to prepare bid specifications and continue towards implementation.
Due to the lead t:i.rœ required, to design and test the Lockbox Concept, the bid
specifications did not include the Ad Valorem Tax portion. This portion will be
considered as a m:xlification to the contract and sub'nitted to City Council at a later
date. Implementation can be expected with the 1989 Tax Year.
The bids were received for both the Banking and Printing Services on September 26, 1988.
An evaluation of the bids for Banking Services was necessary to ensure that volumes and
clearing techniques were consistent among the bidders. In addition, it was noted that
our request for microfilming would result in a duplication of standard bank procedures.
Checks are microfi1læd as part of the clearing process. Therefore, the cost of
microfilming was deleted fran each bid. The results are as follows:
TAB
NCNB Texas
* MBank
$ 48,507
47,616
45,272
As mentioned above, bids for the printing and mailing services were also received on
September 26, 1988. Bids for the printing and mailing services were as follows:
Stanford Financial
Venture Encoding
* Intec Business
$231,100
177,600
155,597
Appropriation of funds for the above items are included in the current Utility Fimd
budget.
Recœmendation:
Award of Lockbox Banking Services Contract to * MBank and award of the Lockbox
Printing/Mailing Services Contract to * Intec Business Systems both being lowest and
best bid.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~-:~~ ~~~ ~v
11 / ubz~
City Manager
02-20-01-4800
02-20-01-2600
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
. Operating Budge't
Other ~ ~
I Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
I Department: Public Works
4IÞ.s b· Approval of Change Order No.
I u Ject:
Water System improvements
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
. Other
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
10/10/88
- Council Meeting Date:
3 - Grapevine Highway
Agenda Number:
PW 88-38
The proposed Change Order No. 3 is for replacement of a defective check valve with
a new pump control valve in the Conn Drive Booster Pump Station at Booth Calloway
Drive and Conn Drive.
This construction is submitted as a change order due to the probable. increase
in cost if this job was bid-by itself.
Change Order No.3 will cost $9,200.
Original Contract Price
Approved Change Orders To Date
Change Order No. 3
$ 311,111.00
21,347.50
9,200.00
$ 341,658.50
500,000.00
Total Control Price To Date
Total Budgeted for this Project
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of Change Order No.3 in the amount of $9,200.
Finance Review
REV
Acct. Number 02-09-22-6700
Sufficient Funds Available
~ 71l~
~
City Manager
. Finance Director
t Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Paae 1 of 1
I-
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
September 27, 1988
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Tex. 76180
Re: 3-553, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
GRAPEVINE HWY. WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
Attached is Change Order No. 3 to the referenced project which has been
executed by the Contractor, Circle 'C' Construction. This change order is
for replacement of a defective check valve with a new Pump Control Valve
in the Conn Drive Booster Pump Station.
You may wish to place this change order on the next Council agenda for
Council consideration of approval. Please confirm if you want us to go
ahead and have the control valve order placed before Council approval to
save time. After Council approval of this change order, please return a
fully executed copy of the change order form to our office for our files.
Please call if you have any questions.
w.~
RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra/F3553C03A/Enclosures
cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Mr. Larry Jones, City Inspector
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
K-E- F NO. 3-553
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO THE CONTRACT WHICH WAS DATED
JUNE 23
, 1988
Between
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CIRCLE ·C· CONSTRUCTION CO.
(OWNER)
(CONTRACTOR)
And
For (Description of Project) GRAPEVIIŒ HIGHIJAY ~ATER SYSTEM IMPROVH1ENTS
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract,
this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change
the work of the Project as follows:
At the Conn Drive Booster Pump Station, No. 5 Booster Pump:
1. Remove existing fittings consisting of:
1 - 811 Dia. Swing Check Valve
1 - 811 Dia. Elbow
1 - 811 Dia. x 911 Long Nipple
1 - 811 X 1011 Dia. Reducing Elbow
Removal of above items is subsidiary to replacement items. Removed items
remain property of the Owner.
2. Furnish and install 1 - 1011 pump control valve canplete with all fittings,
wiring and controls to allow the valve to open and close slowly during normal
pump start up and shut down and close slowly in the event of power failure
or emergency shutdown. The valve shall be a diaphragm actuated, hydraulically
operated angle type valve. Control of valve operation shall be by means of
an externally mounted, four-way solenoid pilot valve. Self cleaning strainers
shall be used to protect the control system. Valve shall utilize line pressure
for operation. A limit switch must be installed to be adjustable over entire
valve travel. Controls shall include a time delay of sufficient time to allow
the valve to close fully in the event of a power failure, before allowing
the pump to restart. Valve shall be Clayton 60-15 Booster Pump Control Valve.
3. Furnish and install fittings consisting of:
1 - 811 Dia. to 1011 Dia. Reducing Flanged Coupling with Anchor
Studs Between Bolts
1 - 1011 Dia. x 3 1/811 Long Nipple
1 - 1011 X 1011 Dia. Elbow
Add the following quantities to existing Contract Items:
NO.
1
2
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
$ 17¿JO
tJ(j
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
QUANT.
1
1
1011 Pump Control Valve & Controls
811 & 10" Cast Iron Flanged
Fittings
EACH
t) (}
D tr'
L.S.
/S"oo
15,/()ð
SUB-TOTAL .............................
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST ...............
EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT ..............
REVISED CONTRACT A~'10UUT ...............
$ 'ie/Of) IJ (J
326,056.00
$~~G/~5",O()
1- / .
.,/'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I "
Page 2, Change Order No.3, K-E-F No. 3-553
Contract completion time shall be increased by
CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE:
/J/ ' / /" / ./
By: / /' /¿Û J? 1. C' / _ :) (0 // ~ ( (ll
j
ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE:
By: &N();~ ~
, /
/
OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
days because of this change.
9 - -2 /
, 1988
Cj.. ~ 7
,
, 1988
, 19 88
I Department: Public Works
4ILubject: Approval of Change Order No. 13 - Watauga Road
II Paving and Drainage Improvements
I"
I
e
. < ··..,.-~·'''·r ·cc<"· ,< ""';"·)"".:"":".'~""''''''.r'""c c, ''''''......' .,.....
"', <."
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
- Council Meeting Date: 10/10/88
Agenda Number:
PW 88-39
The subject change order covers the cost to add a sidewalk/retaining wall
along the south side of Watauga Road across the Kroger shopping center and
Stop-N-Go frontage. Grade separation is too great between parking lot
and back of curb elevations to be handled by grading alone and therefore
will require some retaining wall construction.
The cost of Change Order No. 13 is $10,627.06.
Original Contract Price
Approved Change Orders To Date
Change Order No. 13
$ 3,361,596.24
403,806.76
10,627.06
Total Contract Price To Date
Total Construction Budget
$ 3,776,030.06
$ 3,765,403.00
Funding Source:
Sufficient funds are available in Unspecified Streets CIP and will require a
transfer as indicated below.
From
To
13-90-99-4300 $10,627.06
Unspecified 1986 GO - Streets
13-01-86-6150 $10,627.06
Watauga Road Construction
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 13 in the amount of $10,627.06
and the transfer of funds as described above.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operati g Budget
.,Oth
---.GO
. Finance Director
See above
J ~
Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
City Manager
Pace 1 of __~
I' .
I, :ill i L:"
.!, iJi~
. I i _ _ _;¡
!I!i -no
I;! .
I~IÎ I
! .
:,'I~~ i ~
1'~lìifil !
.s.le~ I,
ii iii Ii
I .. I II
! ,.Ia 'I.
¡:!I!,-. '-,'I
I" I , 5
I
I
I
¡ ·'!I;~!!"-!I'
I····I~II··I··
il il·
.IE ¡I" I §
I II : i~ II ~ I
¡III: l'leïd~~ t.
- i"===i I ~II ·
;; III.!! = i !.: !!
it i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ :j j ~ ~ ~
~ ïJ! ... å' t i. i åv Ii Ii
-J'
(($rJN .J~~HS ~~S)
00." Y.J$ ~N/7 H~.J.YII
--~- .
Ie
I - I
i
r I' · ~ ~ i
I I · I ~
I ·
~ : ! ! .. I
I : i. I I .. i
o , J ,
/ , ~ I.
I
,
I I .;
, I
I I J~l!
,
, ~
I
, ...... .... .... ¡ail
' :
I I I -~~ ¡;., ~~
, I
,
,
, I;c ,
, ~~
J l'-b
Î. ,
~ ~~
~
~
~
. «
f 1- ~~
.! ~ .
I.----__~~--__:~___:__: S!5 I'
-":=:-.:-:;:---,, ~;;;;==~~~-;:~;
, / - .
L"\J' )r-·---:(I-----~ r--,
I, a. I. I
I . , I ..,
; ! I I·"
=~: I I ,-: _'I
Ij!!11 J in:
:iU1!j H¡¡¡¡!
8. ~
ill!!I·
~!'Ii I I
~~I "I' I
l:.'. S i .
I·eli'i.' ~
1¡!sJII~ 1_,
.,_ . t ~ -
,; iiil i ii _Ii:
!, II J a I. ¡ i i
I .,. -I ~
!i:ll:i IliJ~li
e .
~ii,
1=1
I;I~
!I!
!:te;
.lle .
.. ¡~..
I ~I .;!
I I....
~:&!¡
(/S"ON .J~~HS ~~SJ
00<1-6 ·Y.J.S ~N/7 H~.J. YII
¡'
.;
t I
1 k
l'
('i
~~ i
)1 1 .,....
i
i' t
i
t
i
I
I
,/
//
~
;/
/'"
./....
_ _ -.;;.í~-
2
i~
¡
I,
~I
II
.
i
I~ ~
I I !
~~
~
"I
00." ·Y.J.S ~N/7 N~.lYII
". '''M :J :JU~ :J7C"'
ra
........
.
o
Z
ac
\a.I
~
~
()
U1
~
:2:
tC(
:t
"
~
\U
\\\
~
Q
~
~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I '.
an CHAMFER
SA~I CUT \
· EXISTING CONCRETE
PARKING LOT
3000 PSI CONCRETE
PARAPLASTI C
SEALER
~ RETAINING WALL
~ TYPICAL SECTION
STA. 2+37.3 TO STAI 3+48.8
NOT TO SCALE
La.J
LLJ
CI)
I LI.J
en ...J
LLJ -
- u..
0::0
< a::
:> a..
-
o
pR.O.W.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
....
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
September 22, 1988
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Tex. 76180
Re:
3-336, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
WATAUGA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
CHANGE ORDER NO. 13
I 4-0- R::l /
VUt1í()/) U
Attached is proposed Change Order No. 13 to the referenced proj~r
your review and approval. This change order covers the cost ~ add a
sidewalk and retaining wall along the south side of Ryfe ~R9,,~in the
vicinity of the Stop-n-Go and Kroger parking areas. The total amount of
the proposed change order, based on revised quantities and existing
contract unit prices is $10,627.06.
You may wish to place this change order on the next Council agenda for
Council consideration of approval. After Council approval of this change
order, we will send it to the Contractor, Austin Paving, for review and
approval.
We will be present at the next Council meeting to discuss this change
order. Meanwhile, please call if you have any other questions.
w~
R CHARD V. ALBIN, P.E.
RYA/ra/F3336co13/Enclosures
cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager
Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I~ '
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
K·E·F NO. 3-336
CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 TO THE CONTRACT YHICH YAS DATED
SEPTEMBER 14, 1987
Between
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
(OVNER)
(CONTRACTOR)
And
AUSTIN PAVING
For (Description of Project) VATAUGA ROAD · PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract,
this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change
the work of the Project as follows:
£
Construction 4-foot wide, 4-inch thick concrete sidewalk from Sta. 0+60
to Sta. 5+20 on the south side of Vatauga Road. Also, construct
formed reinforced concrete retaining wall on south side of Vatauga Road from
Sta. 2+37.3 to Sta. 4+65.1 as shown on Plan Sheets 49R and 50R.
Add the following quantities to existing Contract items
ITEM UNIT EST.
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANT.
5P. Sawcuts L.F. $1.55 104
14P. 6" Curb and 12" Gutter L.F. $4.61 67
16P. 5" Thick Conc. Driveways S.F. $2.06 630
21P. 4" Thick Cone. Sidewalks S.F. $2.06 1436
35D. CI. 'A' 3000 psi Formed Cone. C.Y. $212.21 27
37D. 2" Dia. Veep Holes EACH $9.52 18
TOTAL
COST
$161.20
$308.87
$1,297.80
$2,958.16
$5,729.67
$171.36
*
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER COST .......................... $10,627.06
EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT.......................... $
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT .......................... $
* Based on previously approved change orders at time of approval
of this change order.
Contract completion time shall be increased by
days because of this change.
CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE:
By:
Date:
, 1988
ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE:
By:
Date:
, 1988
OVNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE:
By:
Date:
, 1988