Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1988-11-14 Agendas I" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA NOVEMBER 14, 1988 - 5:30 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. IR 88-47 Request for Funding - Trinity Arts Council (10 Minutes) 2. Requirements for Appointment to Cable T.V. Board - Councilman Welch (10 Minutes) 3. IR 88-48 Increasing Voluntary Contribution to the Park-and Library Fund (10 Minutes) 4. GN 88-103 Appointment of an Ad Hoc Committee for Golf Course Construction (Agenda Item No. 15) (5 Minutes) 5. GN 88-107 Friends of the Library Gift Shop (Agenda Item No. 19) (5 Minutes) 6. PU 88-56 Recommendation to Approve Bid for City Property Insurance for 1988-89 (Agenda Item No. 20) (5 Minutes) 7. PW 88-41 Authorize Partial Use of Landscape Budget for Watauga Road Project (Agenda Item No. 21) (10 Minutes) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 8. IR 88-52 Watauga Road Alignment (10 Minutes) 9. IR 88-50 Director of Planning and Development (5 Minutes) 10. IR 88-49 Limited Review of Fort Worth Wholesale Wastewater Cost of Service R~te Study (10 Minutes) 11. Subdivision Ordinance Items (GN 88-104, Agenda Item No. 16; GN 88-105, Agenda Item No. 17; & GN 88-106, Agenda Item No. 18) (10 Minutes) 12. PZ 88-7 Request of Julio and Eumelia Neira to rezone the north 150 feet of Block 3, J.L. Autrey Addition from R-3 (single family) to C-2 (Commercia~) (Agenda Item No.8) (5 Minutes) 13. Possible Work Session (5 Minutes) 14. Other Items (5 Minutes) 15. *Executive Session (5 Minutes) a. Personnel b. Briefing on pending Litigation c. Review of Progress on Land Acquisition I" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 16. Adjournment - 7:20 p.m. *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA NOVEMBER 14, 1988 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. ~ NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Special Presentation to Sonya Bellomy & Adriana Bellomy 5. Minutes of the Regular Meeting October 24, 1988 6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 7. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (13, 14, 17, 18, 19~ 20, 21~ 2~, 23 & 24) 8. PZ 88-7 Request of Julio and Eumelia Neira to rezone the north 150 feet of Block 3, J.L. Autrey Addition from R-3 (Single Family) to C-2 (Commercial) (Located at 6650 Glenview Drive) - Ordinance No. 1557 (Ordinance tabled at the September 12, 1988 Meeting) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. PZ 88-18 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Randy and Giner Burton to rezone Tract 2K, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from AG (Agriculture) to R-l (Single Family) (Located on the west side of Clift Street south of Amundson Drive) 10. Ordinance No. 1576 11. PZ 88-19 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of W.F. Nelms to rezone a portion of Tract 3D, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from AG (Agricul~ure) to R-l (Single Family) (Located on the east side of Crane Road between Amundson Drive and Main Street) 12. Ordinance No. 1577 *13. PS 88-19 Request of Mildred Kidwell for Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1 Kidwell Addition (Located on the east side of Davis Boulevard and north of Timber Drive) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *14. PS 88-23 Request of Tar-Two Inc. for Replat of Woodland Oaks Addition (Previously Nob Mill Addition) (Located west of Precinct Line Road and South of Amundson Road) 15. GN 88-103 Appointment of an Ad Hoc Committee for Golf Course Construction 16. GN 88-104 Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a New Subdivision Ordinance *17. GN 88-105 Consideration of Adoption of a New Subdivision Ordinance Ordinance No. 1579 *18. GN 88-106 Approval of the Public Works/Utility Design Manu~l - Resolution No. 88-40 *19. GN 88-107 Friends of the Library Gift Shop *20. PU 88-56 Recommendation to Approve Bid for City Property Insurance for 1988-89 *21. PW 88-41 Authorize Partial Use of Landscape Budget for Watauga Road Project I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *22. PW 88-42 Approve Proposed 1988/89 Expenditures for County Overlay Program Per Inte~local Agreement *23. PW 88-43 Approve Budget for Water Line Improvements with 1988/89 Miscellaneous Street Reconstruction *24. PW 88-44 Approval of Starnes Road Street & Drainage Improvements - Change Order No. 4 25. Citizens Presentation 26. Adjournment I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of J\ðrth Richland Hills, Texas November 11, 1988 ITEM ADDED TO THE NOVEMBER 14, 1988 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 20a. PU 88-57 Ratify Purchase Order 04301 to IBM in the Amount of $121,601 POSTED: November 11, 1988, 2:00 p.m. (817) 281.Q04117301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76180 I I I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 88-51 Date: November 14, 1988 Subject: Delay in Mailing Quarterly Newsletters There was a delay in mailing the newsletters this quarter due to the fact that we changed printers on a trial basis to one whose business is located in North Richland Wills. As this was the printer/typesetter's first time to produce the quarterly newsletters, there was some delay in the production. This delay affected the article on page two, regarding curbside pickup of bulky items. Consequently, some of the residents on the south side of Loop 820 did not have sufficient time in which to have their items placed at the curb in order to be collected. We contacted Laidlaw and they have made special arrangements to rework the south side area the week of November 14th. ~ Also, it was discovered that an insufficient number of newsletters was printed. The second printing involving an additional 2,000 newsletters caused those newsletters to not be mailed until the end of last week. A notice was inserted in these newsletters to advise the citizens who live on the south side of Loop 820 that their bulky items would be picked up the week of November 14th, if they would call to make arrangements. The Laidlaw staff has been very cooperative in helping make the best of a bad situation. We regret the inconvenience that has been caused, and will try to help any of your constituents obtain special service if they will call Ginny Pierce and make such a request. Respectfully submitted, Rodger N. Line City Manager RNL/gp ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 88-47 Date: November 14, 1988 Subject: Request for Funding - Trinity Arts Council Enclosed is a packet of information submitted by the Trinity Arts Council in support of its request for $6,440 from the Hotel Occupancy Taxes for the 1988-89 fiscal year. Ms. Sandra Eddy, Executive Director, has requested an appearance before the City Council to present this request. Mr. Glen Porterfield, President, may also be present. For the Council IS information, the amount budgeted for Trinity Arts Council this year is $2,400, the same amount as last year -- despite an overall reduction in the City·s estimated revenue from the Hotel Occupancy Tax. The staff is not aware of any other possible sources of funding which wou'ld not compete with the needs of vital City services. Respectfully s ¡efl Rqdger N. Line City Manager RNL/gp I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1480 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. Ordinance No. 1143 an~ Section 29 of Ordinance 797 be and are hereby repealed. 2. There is hereby established a seven place Cable Television Board for the City of North Richland Hills. The function of the Board shall be to monitor the operation of the cable television systém to insure compliance with the provisions. of enforceable city ordinances dealing with cable television. The board shall handle citizen complaints and be empowered to hold hearings to verify allegations and arbitrate citizen/company differences. In addition, the Board shall aid the cable company in screening applicants for time on the public access channels which are designated for the exclusive use of citizens of North Richland hills. The Board shall act in an advisory capacity to the Mayor, City Council and City Manager with reference to the development, equipping, expansion and operating of the municipal cable channel, currently identified as CITICABLE 36. It shall be the duty of the Board to immediately and all times thereafter make continuous study of the needs of the City for municipal cable TV facilities, to investigate and recommend the location of adequate municipal cable facilities, suggest means of acquiring and developing such facilities and furnish the City·Council and City Manager with over-all plans and spe'cifications for development and improvement of all such facilities and to report to the City Council and City Manager the result of its,..studies,' recommendations, plans and specifications. In the performance of these duties said Board shall act in an advisory capacity. It is, nevertheless, there specifically provided that said Board shall have no authority to spend nor to co~it the City to the expenditure of any funds or monies whatsoever, except under the specific authorization and direction of the City Council. 3. The Board shall hold meetings at such time and place as it may fix, and such special meetings as may be called by the Chairman or at the request of any three (3) members of the Board. The Board is hereby authorized to provide for the election of a Vice Chairman, who shall preside in the absence of the Chairman, and is further authorized to prescribe such rules and regulations governing its own proceedings as it may deem advisable. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I - I I Ordinance No. 1480 Page Two 4. The Cable Television Board shall consist of seven members, each of whom shall be a resident of the City. Each member shall serve in a designated place numbered one (1) through seven (7). The following persons, presently serving, shall have the following place designations: Bob Langston Byron Sibbet Ga,ye I ng ram Ray Fulenwider Bette Robinson Edward Pat Carruth E.O. Jackson tJ Place 1 (Tarrant County Junior College Representative) Place 2 Place 3 (Birdville Independent School District Representative) Place 4 (Local Clergy) Place 5 Place 6 Place 7 The terms of office shall be for two years except for the first appointments made to comply with the terms of this ordinance. Terms shall run from September 15th and expire on September 15th. The terms of those persons serving or appointed to odd numbered places shall expire on September 15th of odd numbered years and the terms for even numbered places shall expire on September 15th of even numbered years. All members shall serve without compensation. Vacancies shall be filled in the same manner as original appointments. Future appointments shall be as follows: Place 1 from Tarrant County Junior College, Place 2 from the general public, Place 3 from the Birdvil1e Independent School District, Place 4 from the local clergy and Places 5 through 7 from ·the gen~ral public. 5. The Council person serving in a particular place shall be responsible for nominating the perSOA to serve in the corresponding place on the Board: Council Place 1 Board Place 1 Council Place 2 Boa rd Place 2 Council Place 3 Board Place 3 Council Place 4 Board Place 4 Council Place 5 Board Place 4 Council Place 6 Board Place 6 Council Place 7 Board Place 7. The Board is empowered to elect its own Chairman, for yearly term ending on September 15th of each year. I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I II I I I I Ie I Ordinance No. 1480 Page Three 6. If any portion of this ordinance should be declared to be invalid it shall not affect the remaining valid portion. 7. This ordinance shall ße in full force from and after its passage and approval. Passed this 24th day of August, 1987. . Mayo r ATTEST: ~~~d0 g~ fI'ty Secretary APPROVE TO FORM AND LEGALITY: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. I R 88-4R Date: November 14, 1988 Subject: Increasing Volunteer Contribution to the Park and Library Fund The Parks Board and the Library Board have both voted to recommend to the City Council that the voluntary contribution for Park equipment and Library books on water bil~s be increased from $.50 to $1.00 per month. The $. 50 contribution was started in 1971 and provides an additional $52,000 a year that is designated specifically for Park equipment and Library books. Approximately 50% of North Richland Hills citizens make the voluntary contribution and 37% of Watauga citizens contribute. It is unknown what effect this 100% increase will have on participation, particularly in view of the recent significant increase in the water rates and the fac,t that the City of Watauga is now in the process of building their own Library. If the Council wishes to pursue further, it can be placed on the next City Council Agenda. Respectfully submitted, L~ Dennis Horvath Senior Assistant City Manager DH/gp I I e I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Date: November 14, 1988 Subject: Watauga Road Alignment No. TR RR-52 The State Highway Department has set a Public meeting on December 8th at 10 A.M. for the proposed alignments to Watauga Road. This meeting will be held at the North RichlanæHills Recreation Center. There is a map in my office showing the proposed alignments. The Highway Department has asked that we have a spokesman at the meeting to make comments from our City related to (1) our support of the project, and (2) which of the two alignments we prefer or support. In March of this year, the Council voted to take the northern alignment along Cardinal Lane. If you have any questions, please contact me. Respectfully submitted, U Hft'- ~ C. A. Sanford Director of Economic Development ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TEXAS I Ie I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 88-50 ' "SJ~ Date: ~ . V .. Subject: November 14, 1988 Director of Planning and Development I I George Tucker is presently scheduled to work on a part time basis from 8:00 A.M to 12 P.M. Since coming on board, he has also assumed a number of duties on the construct1ton of our new golf course. I would like to suggest ,that'we bring George to a full time basis and fund the additional salary from our golf course budget. His activity load will be full as he continues to take care of Planning and Zoning and all Ordinances related to that activity as well as some other functions in the Economic Development Department. We are starting to see signs of increased activity in commercial development and George is extremely helpful. I I I R~~C¡;¡:Lted' . C. A. Sanford Director of Economic Development I Ie I I I I I I I I- I INFORMAL REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL No. IR 88-49 e Date: November 9, 1988 , Subject: Limited Review of Fort Worth Wholesale Wastewater" Cost of Service Rate Study I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I II The executive sunmary of tl'l~ subject report by Reed-Stowe & Co. is attached for your review. This "due diligence review" of the City of Fort Worth staff's annual rate study update was jointly requested and paid for by City of North Richland Hills, City of Hurst, City of Richland Hills, and City of Arlington. The findings as outlined in the "Executive Sunmary" reveal sane costs allocated to the Fort Worth Wholesale Wastewater CUstaners that shouldn't be. Currently, this arrotmts to $277,000 but could arrount to $1,600,000 next year. The staff requests the Council's approval of presenting the subject report to the City of Fort Worth for their consideration. s ic Wbrks/Utilities Ids I- II III III III III III . -- . U II II n It IJ . II' I o LIMITED REVIEW FORT WORTH WHOLESALE WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE RATE STUDY FISCAL YEAR BEGINKING OCTOBER 1, 1988 v I I~ I I I Participating Wastewater Custome~ Cities of Fort Worth I Dear Sirs: I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ÏII~ÌI~"~M. ~'v IiII '.., \. w..~ ~~ "-~ ~... GOVERNMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES September 30, 1988 Re: Review of Fort Worth 1988 Wastewater Study We have completed our limited review of Fort Worth's 1988 Wastewater Rate Study (the StudY). Our review is not and should not be construed as an opinion on the overall financial reporting of the Fort Worth Water Department and does not represent an opinion as to the fairness or accuracy of the Department's financial records or statements. The summary of our review is presented in the following sections: · Application of the 1987 Wastewater Contract · Lead Lag study and Depreciation study · 1987 Contract Interpretations · Appendix Within each section, we have presented our findings, conclusions and recommendations. While some of our recommendations may not be applicable for the upcoming fiscal ye~r in which these rates will be effective, we present them for your consideration for the full cost of service study to be conducted in .the first two quarters of 1989. Volume BOD TSS Recommended $.4093 .0926 .0469 FWWD $.4295 .0963 .0472 Var $(.0202) (.0037) (.0003) We have extracted and revised EXhibits I-III of FWwD's proposed rate study and have attached them hereto as a preface to our Letter Report. In summary, we our recommending the following rates: "'-'': .~.. ...-.-- ,# .- - - ~ ~ .~ ~,..... ,~,.... ~ ~ ,...... -... I Ie I I I Very truly yours, I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I We would like to acknowledge the cooperation of the FWWD staff which was provided at the same level and quality as the customer cities have become accustomed. It has been our pleasure to assist you in this review. If you should have any questions regarding the content of this Letter Report, we invite you to contact Mr. Jack stOwe at (214) 458-9388. -~ ,~D;. & Co. v I , 11 11 II Iì 11 Iì 11 Itt tJ tJ tJ IJ II . II If I TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES Executive Summary Preface Revised Fort Worth Rate Study Summaries (j Exhibit I-III Application of 1987 Contract Lead Lag Study/Depreciation Study 1987 Contract Interpretations Assignment Factor Calculation Exhibit A O~ & M Functionalization and Wholesale Allocation Exhibit B Net Plant Summary Exhibit C Lead/Lag study Exhibit D Appendix: Fort Worth Responses to Request for Information 1 - 3 4 - 6 7 - 10 I· , II II, II, IIi ., IIi III I. II II n n II . . , I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Cost of Service Study performed by the Fort Worth Water Department to establish charges to the Tarrant County Customer Cities assigns approximately $277,000 annually in excess revenue requirements to those o cities for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1988. Should the Cost of Service Study to be conducted in the first six months of 1989 be performed according to the existing contract with no modifications or clarifications, the potential exists for approximately $1,600,000 in annual excess revenue requirements being assigned to the Customer . Cities. These current and potential excess revenue requirements are as follows: Current Excess Revenue Requirements Cateqorv of Excess Amount j $165,000 9,000 7,000 11,000 5,000 73,000 7,000 $277,000 ..: .~ '~ ,;~ ,'* ~ ~.;.:.. -'¡ ....,. :'~& A~signment of 0 & M Charges (based ,on line sizes) Depreciation of Transportation Equipment (No salvage value) Rate Base Components & Rounding Cost of Depreciation study (All to Customer Cities) Lead Lag study (Included Arlington & Kennedale) Depreciation Expense/Accumulated Depreciation (Rate Base not adjusted) Street Rental Fees v Total Current Excess Revenue Requirements I, , II II -- -- -- Ii . . II II II n II II . If' I POTENTIAL EXCESS REVENUE REQUIREMENTS No off-set for Interest Income No credit for Access Fees Profit Calculations-Rate of Retturn (Unclear contract provisions) Construction Work in Progress Total Potential Excess Revenue Requirements Total Current and Potential Excess Amount $ 836,000 ? 274,000 220.000 $1.330.000 $1,607,000 The categories of excess revenue requirement assignments listed above are discussed in detail within the body of the letter report. I ~~ ~ eity of ~orth ~ch1and 1Iills Ie I I I I I WHEREAS, i..t .ið tdway-ð ~ ple4ðWle. -60Jt. the. MayoJt. and Cliy Counc.ii. o.a, the. Cliy 0-6 NoJLth 1Uehland. H~ to he.tVI. o.a, -ðome.one. who h.lLð won an tllAJaJUi., Jt.e.Cu.ved. Jt.e.cognitlon and. .ið a po.M,t¡ve. Jt.e.6le.c.t.ion on the. CliYi and. I WHEREAS, Sonya Be.lJ..omy, a cÃilzen 0-6 NolLth 1Uc.hlo.nd. H~, Jt.e.ee.ntLy won the. eoveted. Gold Stall AwaJr.d -60Jt. hell excelle.nt peJL6,oJUnance and. dedi..c.ati..on a.ð a 4-H membeJli and. I Ie WHEREAS, the MayoJt. and. Cliy Council. 0-6 the Ci;ty 0-6 NoJtth Ri.c.hlo.nd. H~ de.ðiJt.e. to Jt.ecognize. Sonya -60Jt. hell aeeomptú~ent. I NOW, :THEREFORE, 1, Torrmy B1lown, MayolL 0-6 the. Cliy 0-6 NoJLth Ri.c.hlo.nd. H~, do heJr.eby PJt.ocl.tWn Monday NovembeJr. 14th, 1988 a.ð: I ~ t "SONYA BELLOMY DAY" I i.n the Cliy 0-6 NoJLth 1Uc.hlo.nd. H~ and. Wlge all. cÃilzertð to jOi.n in ~ day 0-6 Jt.ecognitlon. I .. Þo.:, \ (·I I,~c¡.;.I.. f/, ' , , ;:~ 4 I . ". ,.' ~.~, ( . , ,~\~ .. ,,' /..... ,'.. I',. 'f; \_ · ' -'I '/ n, . I. ~ ~ . ¡ .(-;('." . \', ~ - i -:, " r.. J ('" ¡ . 'u, /',:.. ~ /. , '. . , , / 't i "'... . I....j" ï J., '. "/':r-. , r:~~' '-III' . .... I J.. oJ.. ./ . 1", .",.,. IN WITNESS WHE.REOF, 1 Itave heJr.eunto .ðet my hand and CJlU.ðed. the .ðe.al 01, the Ci..ty 0-6 NoJtth R.ic.hlo.nd. H..i.Uð to be aUixed tlLið the 14th day 0-6 NovembeJL, 1988. I I I Ie I I City of ~orth 1UchIand Hills Ie I I I I I WHEREAS, it i..ð almay-ð a plea.ðWte -6oll the Mayoll and Cliy Counc.il 0-6 the CLty 0-6 NolLth R.ic.hl.a.nd H.i.l.lð to he.aJL 01, .6omeone who ha.ð wo n an awlVld., llec.uveå llec.ogniilo n aru:l lð a po~ve lle.ðlec.tion on the City; and I I WHEREAS, Ac:lJvi.ana BeR.1.omy, a c.iUzen 0-6 NoJtth R.ic.hl.a.nd H.i.l.lð, llec.erLtly won the Van/,.oJtth AwaJtd -60ll heJt.. ex.c.eR.1.ent peJtÓ,oJUnanc.e and dedica.ti..on a.ð a 4-H membellj and Ie " ' WHEREAS, the Mayoll and Cliy Counc.il 01,. the Cliy 0-6 N oJtth R..ic.hR.a.nd H.i.l.lð duVr.e to llec.o 9 niz e AdJti.ana -6oll hell ac.c.ompRMhment. I I NOW, THEREFORE, I, Tommy B4own, Mayoll 01,. the City 01,. NoJtth Ri.c.hlaru:l H.i.l.lð, do heJt..eby Plloci.tUm T uuday , NovembeJt.. 15th, a.ð: I "ADRIANA BELLOMY DAY" ..in the CLty 0-6 NolLth R.ic.hl.a.nd H.i.l.lð and. Ultge all c.iUzenð to jo..in ..in ~ day 0-6 llec.ogniilon. I I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heJt..eunto -ðå my haru:l and c.aUðed. the -ðeai. 0-6 the City 01,. No4th R..ic.hland H.i.l.lð to be a6-6i.x.ec1 thið the 14th day 01,. Novemb~, 1988. 1 ~ . Q BJtoWI1; Mayo I 1_/ I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - OCTOBER 24, 1988 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Brown called the meeting to order October 24, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Tommy Brown Mayor Lyle Welch Councilman Frank Metts, Jr. Councilman Byron Sibbet Councilman Linda Spurlock Councilwoman Staff: Rodger N. Line Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Richard Albin City Manager City Secretary Attorne..Y City Engineer Absent: Richard Davis Virginia Moody Mack Garvin Dennis Horvath Mayor Pro Tern Councilwoman Councilman Senior Assistant City Manager 3. INVOCATION Councilman Welch gave the invocation. ' Mayor Brown took a point of privilege. Mayor Brown asked Councilman Welch to go to the lectern. Mayor Brown advised that Councilman Welch had donated his council check to the animal shelter and Mrs. Welch was also giving a $50.00 check to the animal shelter. Councilman Welch stated his wife had read in the paper where someone had donated dog food so she also wanted to make a donation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 10, 1988 APPROVED Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the minutes of the October 10, 1988 meeting. Motion carried unanimously. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I !I I I I I I Ie I October 24, 1988 Page 2 5. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 17, 1988 APPROVED Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to approve the minutes of the October 17, 1988 meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 6. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Metts removed Item No. 10 from the Consent Agenda. 7. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (8, 9, 12) APPROVED Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. * 8. PS 88-17 REQUEST OF NORTH, RICHLAND HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH FOR REPLAT OF LOT lR, PARCHMAN ADDITION (LOCATED SOUTH OF GLENVIEW DRIVE AND WEST OF VANCE) APPROVED * 9. GN 88-100 REVISED ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE - ORDINANCE NO. 1574 APPROVED 10. GN 88-101 AMENDMENT TO BUILDING CODE (ORDINANCE NO. 1560) - ORDINANCE NO. 1575 DENIED Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to deny Ordinance No. 1575. Motion carried unanimously. 11. GN 88-102 APPOINTMENT TO LIBRARY BOARD Councilman Sibbet moved, seconded by Councilman Welch, to appoint Janice Fenimore to the Library Board, Place 3. Motion carried unanimously. I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I II I I I I I Ie I October 24, 1988 Page 3 *12. PW 88-40 APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER #6 - GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED 13. CITIZENS PRESENTATION - MR. HOWARD NIX, PRINCIPAL FOSTER VILLAGE ELEMENTARY RE: SIDEWALK IN THE VICINITY OF FOSTER VILLAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Mr. Howard Nix, Principal at Foster Village Elementary School, appeared before the Council. Mr. Nix stated he was representing the parent clientele for sidewalks around Foster Village Elementary School. Mr. Nix stated that Cross timbers , Little Ranch Road and Meadowview did not have sidewalks and therefore there was no place for the children to walk to school. Mr. Nix stated that Hightower had asphalt sidewalks that needed attention. Mr. Nix stated there was a pathway on the east side of Rufe Snow and asked that the City put down crush rock so the children would have some place to walk when it was muddy. Mr. Nix stated they pleaded for the Council IS consideration for sidewalks on these streets. Councilman Metts stated that perhaps some of the sidewalks had been left off by previous developers and asked ,Mr. Nix if he had checked into that. Mr. Nix stated no, he was only going' by what he had been told by city officials. Mr. Line stated he was not aware of any sidewalks that had been left off where the developer was required to build them. Mayor Brown advised Mr. Nix that the City would look into the situation and get back with him. Mrs. Michael Filis, 6852 Megan, appeared before the Council~ Mrs. Filis expressed her concern for sidewalks around the school. Mr. Paul S. Dauer, 6829 Mesa, appeared before the Council. Mr. Dauer urged the Council to look at the area and advised that he did leave a tape of the area with the City Secretary. Mr. Dauer asked that the Council also look at Little Ranch Road because it was a narrow street with bar ditches on both sides. Mr. Thomas Roseborrough, 6417 Wakefield, appeared before the Council. Mr. Roseborrough stated that'Little Ranch Road was used by the children going to school. Mr. Roseborrough stated that something needed to be done to get the kids off the street. Mr. Roseborrough asked if an easement could be granted for a walkway on Little Ranch Road. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I October 24, 1988 Page 4 Mr. Albert G. McDaniel, IV, 6736 Starnes Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. McDaniel stated that his child had to go down Crosstimbers to school and because there was no place to walk they had to drive him. Mr. McDaniel stated he felt that by having to drive the children to school, he was adding to the traffic congestion at the school. Mr. McDaniel stated there was a problem with cars parking on both sides of Crosstimbers which also made it dangerous for the children who used that street. Councilman Sibbet asked if no parking during school hours signs could be placed on Crosstimbers. Mr. Line stated the parking situation on Crosstimbers was looked at some months ago because the people could not receive their mail because of the cars being parked there. Mr. Line stated staff would check into the parking situation and see if something could not be done. Mr. Line stated he had talked to Councilman Garvin concerning the children walking in the area and he was also very concerned. Mr. Line stated the staff was checking into making Little Ranch Road a one way street. Mr. Line stated the entire area needed to be looked at and staff would look into it and report back to the Council by November 14th. Mayor Brown advised the City would be looking into the situation and get back with Mr. Nix and others. Councilman Metts thanked Mr. Nix and others for bringing the situation to the attention of the Council and adv.lsed it would be studied. . 14. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Metts moved, seconded by Councilman Sibbet, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary '" --. I :; CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: .Ubject: I Economic Development Council Meeting Date: 11/14/88 Request of Julio and Eumelia Neira to Rezone the North l.JU l"eet or J:S.Lock 3, J. L. AUt:rey Add1c1on from R-3 to C-2. Ordinance 1557 PZ 88-7 Agenda Number: I This rezoning request is presented on the property located at 6650 Glenview Drive. The property is on the south side of Glenview Drive at the corner of Glenview and Rita Beth Street. a I The applicants state that they wish to open a restaurant at this location. I At the public hearing before Commission, several citizens who reside on Rita Beth Street, appeared in opposition to the proposed rezoning. The Council held a public hearing on September 12, 1988, and tabled Ordinance 1557 until such time a Site Plan showing proposed building, parking, fencing, and landscaping and entrances could be presented. RECOMMENDATION: The requested information has now been received, therefore, the City Council should act 4IÞupon the requested rezoning. ~ ~ ~ I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget 4IÞ Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Kf1b City Manager . Finance Director ~,I ------ I Ie I I I I I I I / I ZONING MAP I Ie I ( ( · j(f- ~ l~H' MAYOR ..... ....- "'~ .~ ....-; I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( September 12, 1988 Page 2 Motion carried 5-0. o 6. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29 & 30) APPROVED Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Consent Agenda. Mayor Pro'Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman 17 to this point in the agenda. Motion carried 5-0. . GN 88-72 ORDINANCE A ORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF "CITY OF NORTH RIC D HILLS TAX AND GOLF COURSE REVENUE CERTIFICA OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1988" _ DINANCE NO. 1565 APPROVED Mr. Line stated that rst Southwest Company and the City's legal advisor have recommended t accept the bid of Clayton-Brown & Associates. Mayor Pro Tern vis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance N · 1565 and the bid of Clayton-Brown & Associates, Inc. for the purchase 4.23 million dollars City of North Richland Hills, Texas Tax and Go Course Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 1988 dated Sep ber 1, 1988 with the net effective interest rate of 7.489762 percent. 7. PZ 88-7 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF JULIO AND EUMELIA E. NEIRA TO REZONE THE NORTH 150 FEET OF BLOCK 3, AUTREY ADDITION FROM R-3 TO C-2 (LOCATED AT 6650 GLENVIEW DRIVE _ SOUTH SIDE OF GLENVIEW DRIVE AT THE CORNER OF - GLENVIEW AND RITA BETH STREET) (POSTPONED FROM AUGUST 8TH, 1988) Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Pedro Rodriguez, 5560 Glenview, representing Julio Neira, appeared before the Council. Mr. Rodriguez stated they wanted to build a restaurant on the property. I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I II I I I I I I- I ( ( September 12, 1988 Page 3 Councilwoman Moody stated that at the Planning and Zoning Meeting there was concern about the traffic on Rita Beth and the parking problems. Councilwoman Moody stated that if the restaurant was not built, she was concerned about the other businesses that could go under the C-2 zoning. Councilwoman Moody asked if they would agree to a Planned Development restriction with no ingress or egress onto Rita Beth. Mr. Rodriguez stated they would. {j Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked if they were going to use the existing house or would they build another bUilding. Mr. Rodriguez stated they would use the existing house, but they would be putting brick around it. Councilman Garvin asked if the restaurant would have facilities for sit down or would it be a carry out restaurant. Mr. Rodriguez stated it would be both. Councilman Garvin asked where they planned for the cars to park and how they would enter and exit the parking lot. Mr. Rodriguez stated there was plenty of room for parking in the area at the back of the house and that they would access the parking lot from the other side of the house. Mayor Brown called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Brown closed the Public Hearing. I 8. ORDINANCE NO. 1557 TABLED Councilman Garvin stated because the only access to the parking facilities would be through someone else's property and because of the location and size of the lot, he recommended that the request be denied. Mr. Rodriguez stated they would be parking in front and behind the house. Mr. Rodriguez stated it would be a small restaurant. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked if the Staff had looked at a proposed site plan layout. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated he would like for the ordinance to be postponed until a site plan could be submitted showing the parking and landscaping. Mr. Horvath stated he was concerned about the expense involved in upgrading the building from residential to commercial. I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ~ September 12, 1988 Page 4 Councilwoman Moody stated she felt it should be tabled until a site plan could be submitted and for the applicant to get with the City Staff concerning what would be involved to bring the building up to City Code. Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to table Ordinance No. 1557 and that the applicant bring in a site plan showing how they are going to refurbish the bUilding, parking, landscaping, entrances, etc., and with the recommendation that there be no entrances off of Rita Beth, screening walls as requi~ed by City Code and bring it back to the Council in one month. Motion carried 5-0. 9. PZ 88~11 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF E-SYSTEMS POOL TRUST TO REZONE TRACTS 4B, 4Al, 4A4, 4A5A, 4A5B AND 4A5C, J. H. BARLOUGH SURVEY, ABSTRACT 130 FROM R-3 TO C-l (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LEWIS LANE AT DAVIS BOULEVARD) Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing for PZ 88-11, PZ 88-12 and and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of these reque s please come forward. Mr. David Washington, Washington & Associates Engineers 00 Grapevine Highway, Hurst, representing E-Systems Pool Trust, ap ared before the Council. Mr. Washington stated that PZ 88-11 was for co zoning. Mr. Washington stated the property was bounded 0 he east by Lewis Lane, was immediately south of the future extension Watauga Road, bounded on the north and east by eXisting commercia~ an on the west across Lewis Lane by eXisting commercial. ~r. Washington s ted that approval of this request would allow the planning of the enti property and would assist in solving what could be a major tra c problem at the intersection of Davis, Watauga and Lewis Lane b llowing the closing of Lewis Lane. Mr. Washington stated that 88-12 was located immediately south of the Sunny Meadows Addition. . Washington stated this proposed zoning was a transitional zoning fr the existing Holiday East Mobile Home Park located to the south 0 the R-3 buffer to the north. Mr. Washington stated it was a st ping zoning from the mobile home park to R-7 to R-8 to R-3 in the exist" g development. Mr. Washington stated the property was bounded on th ast by proposed industrial zoning and on the west by existing R-Z oning. Mr. Was ngton stated that PZ 88-13 concerned the proposed industrial zonin east of Sunny Meadows Addition. Mr. Washington stated that the Pl ing & Zoning Commission recommended, and the owners concurred, that area to the north of the proposed Watauga Road be zoned C-l, there be 200 foot wide strip adjacent to the existing residential zoning of 0-1 and that the remainder of the property be granted for industrial. · . I I. I I I I I I I I~ I I I I I I I ( ~ August 8, 1988 Page 3 Counci1man Sibbet asked Mr. Scoma what his suggestion would be. Mr. Scoma stated that he felt it should be commercial There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Brow Hearing. ~ Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved Ordinance No. 1556. to approve is stated he felt the multi-family wou1d be a good buffer zone. Ma ro Tern Davis stated there were very strict guidelines for the de opment of multi-family and he also felt multi-family was the st and best use for the land. Motion carried 4-0. 10. PZ 88-7 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF JULIO AND EUMELIA E. NEIRA TO REZONE THE NORTH 150 FEET OF BLOCK 3, J.L. AUTREY ADDITION, FROM R-3 TO C-2 (LOCATED AT 6650 GLENVIEW - SOUTH OF GLENVIEW AT THE CORNER OF GLENVIEW AND RITA BETH STREET) The applicant requested that this item be postponed. ~ 11. o ORDINANCE NO. 1557 POSTPONED 12. PZ 88-8 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF MARVIN D. SMITH TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 2, JOHN CONDRA SURVEY, ABSTRACT 311, FROM AG TO R-2 (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LINCOLN DRIVE APPRO ELY 112 FEET EAST OF CIMARRON DR Mayor Brown opened the Public Hearing a lled for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to ~ e come forward. , appeared before the Council. Mr. Smith stated with the are houses. he was requesting R-2 zoning which was compatible r. Smith stated he planned to build 2,000 square foot I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS JULY 14, 1988 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. PZ 88-7 The meeting was called to order Vice Chairman, John Schwinger, P. M. PRESENT: Vice Chairman Secretary Members John Schwinger Carole Flippo Don Bowen Mark Wood David Barfield Manny Tricoli C. A. Sanford Wanda Calvert t. Member Dir. Economic Dev. P & Z Coordinator ABSENT: Ron Lueck Mr. Wood made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Barfield and the motion carried 5-0 with Ms. Flippo , abstaining since she was not present at the meeting. Request of Julio & Eumelia E. Neira to rezone the north 150 feet of Block 3, J.L. Autrey Addition, from its present classification of R-3 Single Family to ,C-2 Commercial. This property is located at 6650 Glenview Drive. ' I Vice Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Julio Neira came forward. He stated his Brother-in Law wanted to open a restaurant at this location. Mr. Wood asked if they were aware of the building codes. Mr. Neira said they were. I Page 2 ( P & Z Minutes Ie July 15, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I II I I I I I I Ie I ( Vice Chairman Schwinger called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Thurburn Key, 4024 Rita Beth, came forward. He said the neighbors do not want any business there. He said Rita Beth is a little street, only one block long. He said the parking would block them and the traffic would be dangerous for the 8 to 10 school'kids in the area. Vice Chairman Schwinger asked Mr. Key where he lived. Mr. Key said he lives on the same side of Rita Beth. Mr. Bowen stated there are parking requirements that would have to be met. . Mr. Key said several of the neighbors would have come tonight, but were ill. Mr. Barfield asked Mr. Key if it would be agreeable with him if the Commission stipulated that their access would be to Glenview and there ,would be no entrances on Rita Beth. Mr. Key said it would not bother him that way. Mr. Tricoli said you can not stop them parking on the street even if you put up "No Parking" signs. Mr. Wood said he was not sure the Commission could grant a stipulation that the only access would be on Glenview. He said this is so close to Rufe Snow Drive that it might back traffic up to the intersection. I Page 3 ( P & Z Minutes Ie July 14, 1988 I I I I I I I Ie I I ,I I I I I Ie I f Phillip Bramer, 4019 Rita Beth, came forward. He said he did not get a letter and he has lived there 30 years. Mr. Bramer said he has the same objections to this as Mr. Key. He said there are no sidewalks and this would create more traffic. Julia Brewer, 4033 Rita Beth, came forward. She said her mother lives at this address. She said most of the people who live in this area are 'old people. Ms. Brewer said if two cars park on the street no one could get through. She said if the entire area could go commercial, it would be fine because they could sell, but not just one lot. G. D. Brewer, 4033 Rita Beth, came forward. He said this man's intentions are great, but what will happen later on; what would be there ' the next 5 years. He said odds are not good for survival in the restaurant business. Mr. Brewer said it might work out if there was no traffic on Rita Beth. Vice Chairman Schwinger closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Barfield asked Mr., Neira if he could live with an entrance only on Glenview with a screening wall. Mr. Neira said he could. He said he does not need an entrance on Rita Beth. Mr. Neira said all they need is a drive around and out. He said these people live behind this property. Mr. Tricoli said he feels you can not stop parking on the side of the street and he is not in favor of this request. I ~ I Page 4 p & Z Minutes July 14, 1988 ( ( I I o Mr. Barfield said if you have a screening fence there would be no need for them to park there. He said this is adjacent to commercial and there is commercial across the street and he feels with commercial all around, this is the best use for the property. Mr. Barfield said the neighbors say they would not be against it if there is no entrance on Rita Beth and there is a screening fence. I I Mr. Tricoli made a motion to deny PZ 88-7. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen. This motion failed by a vote of 2-4 with Mr. Barfield, Mr. Wood, Ms. Flippo and Vice Chairman Schwinger voting against the denial. I I PZ 88-7 APPROVED Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PZ 88-7 with the stipulation that there be no entrance to Rita Beth and a 6 foot screening wall along the western side of the property as long as there is residential there. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-2 with Mr. Tricoli and Mr. Bowen voting against. Ie I I I Mr. Bowen asked if the fence would block the view of traffic. I I I I Ie I Mr. Sanford said it would have to be set back far enough for the sight triangle. 2. PZ 88-8 Request of Marvin D. Smith to rezo portion of Tract 2, John Con Survey, Abstract 311, 1ts present classification 0 Agriculture to R-2 Single 11y. This property is loc on the north side of Lincoln 1ve, approximately 112 feet east of Cimarron Drive. Vice Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I 'I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWl TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas Hay 24, 1988 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 88-07 REVIEY LETTER, ZONING FROM R-3 TO C-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 147 Ye have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. To accelerate the zoning review process, we would recommend that a vicinity map be shown on all future zoning request submittals. Sus~ Sc:.."\JJ~rL SUSAN SCHYINGER, G.C.E. SLS/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic Development Director Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. Richard Royston, Director' of Development Zoning Review PZ 88-07 Page 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1557 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE 111080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING CO~SSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-7 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-3 to Ç-2. ALL That certain tract or parcel of land being the North 150 feet of Block 3, J.L. Autrey Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as described in Deed recorded in Volume 388-J, Page 237, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a steel rod at the Northeast corner of said Block 3, said point being in the South right-of-way line of Glenview Drive (a public right-of-way); THENCE South 150 feet to a steel rod; THENCE West 89.83 feet to a steel rod in the East right-of-way line of Rita Beth Street (a public right-of-way),\said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to tbe right whose radius bears South 70 degrees 37 minutes 00 seconds Eas~ at 50~00 !eet; THENCE along said right-of-way line of Rita Beth Street and said curve to the right an arc distance of 12.7 feet to a steel rod at the end of said curve to the right and at the beginning of a curve to the left whose radius bears West at 100.00 feet; THENCE along said right-of-way line of Rita Beth Street and said curve to the left 33.83 feet to a steel rod; THENCE North along said East right-of-way line of Rita Beth Street 104.85 feet to a steel rod at the intersection of the East right-of-way line of Rita Beth Street and the South right-of-way line of Glenview Drive; THENCE East along said South right-of-way line of Glenview Drive, 81.5 feet to the place of beginning. r Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 This property is located at 6650 Glenview Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14th DAY OF JULY, 1988. a~ SECRETARY -~ÞLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-88-7 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM ~ LEGALITY: ATTORNEY ~,«, .< :\,:crr,;",,"t;r, '''''*'''"ec'',' '" '< """',. "'>,e I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: . &ubject: I I I I I 1,··,;,:,·,·,:1 -~-:~t ~!I ',.<>-.-, ~¡~I e !~I ~zl Economic Development 11/14/88 - Council Meeting Date: Public Hearing on Request of Randy and Ginger Burton PZ 88-18 to Rezone Tract LK, T.K. Martl.n ::survey, Abst:ract: 10.5.5 Agenda Number: from AG to R-l Ordinance No. 1576 This rezoning request is presented on vacant property located on the west side of Clift Street, south of Amundson Drive. The applicants wish to construct a single family residence on the subject property. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the zoning application PZ 88-18 requesting rezoning from AG to R-I be approved. The City Council should hold the required Public Hearing and act on the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I ~-"'-_.'~""----"---'--- ---...---.- /1 1 ¡t~~ City Manaq~:r . Finance Director A-G C-I 1387 I-I Pt '6~-'~ -.- '!> lC Z-1. AG R-3 '090 I / 1/ , , I t \ ", I-I \ , su \ " , \ \+, \ ,FJ? , , ~ &"="~-'-~,*Ø~'Vil!$'j'j\0*"":';:'''''' I-I 1524 ~~ I AG I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 5 P & Z Minutes October 13, 1988 ( ( Mr. Lueck asked if someone advised them to do this and why. Mr. Kidwell said they do not wis donate land and pay assessments {j Mr. Wood said the Commissio can waive the requirement for dedic ion of right of way. they need the get it by Mr. Barfield said right of way, the condemnation. Mr. Kidwell aid he would like to talk to someon about this that knows more about i than he does. PS 88-19 APPROVED Mr. arfield made the motion to a rove PS 88-19 subject to the ngineer's comments, the plat show the property platted all the way to Davis Boulevard, and that items 2, 4, and 6 be waived until such time the use of the property changes for any reason. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood. Mr. Lueck asked if this would delay the plat going to council. Mr. Tucker said it wouldn't. The motion carried 7-0. 5. Request of Marvin D. Smith Corp. for preliminary plat of Lots 8 & 9, Block 5, Maroaks Addition. PS 88-20 APPROVED Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 88-20. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0. 6. PZ 88-18 Request of Randy & Ginger Burton to rezone Tract 2K, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-I Single Family. This property is located on the west side of Clift Street, south of Amundson Drive. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 6 ~ P & Z Minutes October 13, 1988 (] PZ 88-18 APPROVED 7. PZ 88-19 ( Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Owen D. Long, Engineer, came forward to represent Mr. & Mrs. Burton. He stated they propose to build a residence on this large tract and they plan to build a large house so he suggested they ask for R-1. Mr. Long stated the Burtons are present if the Commission has any questions. Chairman Schwinger called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Brock made the motion to approve PZ 88-18. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0. Request of W.F. Nelms to rezone a portion of Tract 3D, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-l Single ily. : This property is locat on the east side of Crane Road een Amundson Drive and Main eet. Chairman winger opened the Public Hear and called for those wishing t peak in favor of this request to please come forward. Owen D. Long, Engineer, came forward to represent Mr. Nelms. He said they plan to build a residence on this large lot so he suggested they request R-l zoning. Chairman Schwinger called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 27, 1988 (] Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 88-18 REVIEY LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-l REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 71 Ye have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updat~ng should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. SÙ~~~~ S::~~ SUSAN L. SCHYINGER, G.C.E. SLS/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic ·Development Director Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning Zoning Review PZ 88 - 18 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1576 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-18 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-l. BEING a portion of the Tandy K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being that same 1 acre tract of land designated as Tract 2, conveyed to Tommy A. Walling by deed recorded in Volume 7927, Page 1024, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at a 1/2 inch iron pin found at the intersection of the South line of Amundson Road with the West'line of Clift Street, being the Northeast corner of that certain 1 acre tract, designated as Tract 1 in said deed to Tommy Walling; THENCE South 32 degrees 46 minutes 00 seconds East, with the West line of Clift Street and the East line of said Tract 1, 216.68 feet to a 3/4 inch pipe for the Southeast corner of saip Tract 1, and the point of beginning of this tract herein described; THENCE with the West line of Clift Street, South 26 degrees 13 minutes 49 seconds East, 100.0 feet, South 16 degrees 28 minutes 45 seconds East, 50.04 feet, and South 10 degrees 28 minutes 45 seconds East, 64.0 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pin found in concrete at the base of a fence corner; THENCE South 68 degrees 13 minutes 33 seconds West, generally with a fence, 244.25 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pin found at the base of a fence corner, by deed 2988.1 feet West and 789 feet South from the Northeast corner of said Martin Survey, said 1/2 inch iron also being the Southeast corner of before mentioned Tract 2; THENCE North 02 degrees 27 minutes 39 seconds East, generally with a fence, 15.30 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pin at the base of a fence corner; THENCE North 02 degrees 46 minutes 46 seconds West, 161.87 feet to a 3/8 inch iron pin for the Southwest corner of Tract 1; I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 THENCE North 55 degrees 08 minutes 00 seconds East, with the common line between said Tracts 1 and 2. 199.86 feet to the point of beginning and containing 0.9686 acres of land. This property is located on the west side of Clift Street, south of Amundson Drive. ~ APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1988. ~~ SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-88-18 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1988. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY r1~ I I Economic Development Department: .Ubject: I I I I I I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the zoning application PZ 88-19 requesting rezoning from AG to R-l be approved. II The City Council should hold the required public hearing and act on the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission I_ I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 11/14/88 - Council Meeting Date: Public Hearing on Request of W.F. Nelms to Rezone PZ 88-19 a Portion of Tract 3D, T.K. Mart~n ~urvey, Abstract: lO~;nda Number: from AG to R-l. Ordinance No. 1577 This rezoning request is presented on vacant property located on the east side of Crane Road between Amundson Drive and Main Street. The applicants wish to construct a single family residence on the subject property. RECOMMENDATION: Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Bud et _ Other & ! Depart, ent Head Signature t---------------------------- -- ,----" ,'~ Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available r::11l¿~ City Manager , Finance Director """ .~ , --------....,...--.---.."'........-.- .--.--..-, A-G C-I 1387 I-I AG R-3 '090 I I I ,I I I I ' \\ \ , I-I \ , SU \ " , \ \ -t-,.. \. ~:'- I-I 1524 I I Page 6 P & Z Minutes October 13, 1988 ( Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 7. PZ 88-19 I I I I I I Ie I ( Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishi to speak in favor of this reque to please come forward. Owen D. Long, Enginee to represent Mr. stated they pr se to build a residence 0 his large tract and they plan to ild a large house so he sug ed they ask for R-1. Mr. Long ed the Burtons are present if the Commission has any questions. Chairman Schwinger called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Brock made the motion to approve , PZ 88-18. This motion was seconded by . Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0. Request of W.F. Nelms to rezone a portion of Tract 3D, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-1 Single Family. This property is located on the east side of Crane Road between Amundson Drive and Main Street.1 Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Owen D. Long, Engineer, came forward to represent Mr. Nelms. He said they plan to build a residence on this large lot so he suggested they request R-l zoning. Chairman Schwinger called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. . I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 7 P & Z Minutes October 13, 1988 ( PZ 88-19 APPROVED 8. PS 88-16 PS 88-16 ( There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve PZ 88-19. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. Recommendation for adoption of amended Subdivision Ordinance. Mr. Wood made the motion to recomm approval to the City Council as revised in the Master copy. T motion was seconded by Mr. Be the motion carried 7-0. Ms. Donnelle Moore, requested to speak. 3 years ago at a C Council meeting it was said that oliday Lane was going to 4 Ian and would be straightened t. Ms. Moore said she wrote two ters to the City Council . and Plan · g and Zoning to see what the st s was, but never received an so she decided to come to the asked if she lived north or the highway. Ms. Moore said north. She said there are 17 houses that face Holiday Lane and if they widen it, it would be another Rufe Snow. Mr. Tucker stated this Commission is going to look at the Thoroughfare Plan. He said the staff has recommended Holiday Lane be changed to an extra wide 2 lane street. Mr. Tucker said Public Works is looking at ways to help move the traffic. He said the City 1s trying to get right of way from Industrial Park Boulevard to Holiday Lane for another way out to Watauga Road. I " Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ,¡' ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas September 27, 1988 iJ Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 88-19 REVIEY LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-I REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 71 Ye have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. s...~ cf. ~~ SUSAN L. SCHYINGER, G.C.E. SLS/ss Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. C.A. Sanford, Economic 'Development Director Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning Zoning Review PZ 88 - I 9 Page 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ,I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1577 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS , PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-88-19 the following desc~ibed property shall be rezoned from AG tQ R-1. BEING a tract of land out of the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, Tarrant County, Texas, and being described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the East line of Crane Road, said point being 211.0 feet South and 50.0 feet East of the Southeast corner of Lot 1, Dawn-King Addition to the City of Smithfield, Tarrant County, Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-M, Page 105, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 00 degrees 07 minutes 23 seconds West along the East line of Crane Road 100.0 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE North 88 degrees 27 minutes 07 seconds East 60.1 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 34 minute,s 15 seconds East 240.06 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE North 99.78 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds West 299.92 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.68 acres of land, more or less. , I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 This property is located on the east side of Crane Road between Amundson Drive and Main Street. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1988. a I' ~~~ SECRETARY PLANNING Z -- ~SSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-88-19 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1988. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I ,01. ,~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Economic Development 11/14/88 Jepartment: Council Meeting Date: ~ Request of Mildred Kidwell for Final Plat of Lot 1, PS 88-19 I SUbject: Agenda Number: ,Block 1, Kidwell Addition This Final Plat Application is presented for consideration of Lot 1, Block 1, Kidwell Addition. The subject property is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard and north of Timber Drive. The purpose of the p'lat is to allow construction of a golf driving range. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the plat application PS 88-19 with stipulation that the following engineering comments be waived until such time as the use of the property is changed. A. 112. Construction plans for an off-site and on-site water, sanitary sewer, streets and drainage improvements be submitted and approved by Public Works. e 114. Drainage impact fees may be due 116. A sidewalk should be constructed along Davis Boulevard. B. Plat be changed to include property up to Davis right of way. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available 1--------"---- c~: ~" /J , _,¡tt/~ , C;;tv '~(~ sr ~..:- , Finance Director 1198 ( - ---~ _ ~... i _J~L- - - -----L_ G · y-~ ¡ll~'"-.I 1'1 j-__L _ _~___ ~ - ----~ · "'~~L ~-2--! .1202 __ _ ~( - - - ---- I' C-I c- r su AG R-2 ~ 1428 1429 I I . ,llliY! ~ ~T .~ v ~'f' );..'f. ?Þ- 0-1 J2~0 0-1 1204 R-3 \~.. ·"I~L.~ I~'.. AG KI"'fK L.Q~ =( R-2 -1800 I I I Page 3 P & Z Minutes October 13, 1988 ( Ie I I ~ I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ~ PS 88-17 APPROVED 4. PS 88-19 TABLED 9/22/88 ( Mr. Barfield said the reason the fire department does not want to use the fire hydrant across Glenview is t is no one to control traffic f several minutes and someone drive over the hoses. Mr. Wood stated they e 300 foot coverage on most of e area and the two hydrants rea a portion of the building. He for the expense involved, he eels the church has plenty of verage already. Mr. Wood stated hing is being changed on the north nd of the lot and they have suf cient coverage on the south end. Bowen stated regarding pro rata, this Commission cannot waive pro rata, only the City Council can. Mr. Brock made the motion to approve PS 88-17. Mr. Barfield said it needs to be subject to the engineer's comments and waive the following items: #4 of the September 22nd letter regarding the building line on Parchman Street; US-waive the right of way; H9, 10, & II-waive. Mr. Brock amended his motion. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. Request of Mildred Kidwell for final plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Kidwell Addition. Mr. Lueck asked why did they need at least 50 foot street frontage. Mr. Tucker said it stated in the subdivision ordinance the definition of a lot that it must front on a public street and be at least 50 feet wide. I Page 4 p & Z Minutes October 13, 1988 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Mr. Bowen asked how could the Commission act on this if it does not meet the ordinance. Mr. Tucker said the Commission could ask the Kidwells if they would make the change prior to going to the City Council. Curtis Kidwell came forward. He said he would not have a problem with 50 feet along Davis Boulevard. Mr. Wood stated the Commission would consider waiving some of the engineer's comments for some period of time, but sooner or later the requirements will have to be done. Mr. Wood asked Mr. Kidwell if they would have a problem with a time frame of 5 years. Mr. Lueck stated he had rather have it if the use of the land is changed. Mr. Kidwell said they would have no objection to that. Mr. Barfield asked why they just wanted a 50 foot strip along David Boulevard, why not plat all the property. Mr. Kidwell said they/did not plan to use that land at this time. Mr. Barfield said they need to plat all the property to the street. Mr. Kidwell asked how much right of way would be needed for Davis. Mr. Tucker stated they plan to have a 6 lane highway. Mr. Kidwell said they would consider a trade-off, right of way for assessment. I' Page 5 P & Z Minutes October 13, 1988 ( Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I PS 88-19 APPROVED 5. PS 88-20 PS 88-20 APPROVED 6. PZ 88-18 ( Mr. Lueck asked if someone advised them to do this and why. Mr. Kidwell said they do not wish to donate land and pay assessments. Mr. Wood said the Commission can waive the requirement for dedication of right of way. Mr. Barfield said when they need the right of way, they can get it by condemnation. Mr. Kidwell said he would like to talk to someone about this that knows more about it than he does. Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PS 88-19 subject to the engineer's comments, the plat show the property platted all the way to Davis Boulevard, and that items 2, 4, and 6 be waived until such time the use of the property changes for any reason. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood. Mr. Lueck asked if this would delay the plat going to council. Mr. Tucker said it wouldn't. The motion carried 7-0. Request of Marvin D. Smith Corp. preliminary plat of Lots 8 & 9 5, Maroaks Addition. made t otion to approve motion was seconded by nd the motion carried 7-0. equest of Randy & Ginger Burton to rezone Tract 2K, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-l Single Family. This property is located on the west side of Clift Street, south of Amundson Drive. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I c October (, 1988 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Ref. FINAL PLAT Lot 1, Block 1, Kidwill Add. 1. Statement 2. Due to our proposed use of property we feel that oUr existin~ utilities will be sufficient. 3. Being as this platting does not include property frontage on Davis Blvd.only access; nor will there be any additional access to· existing water line. We feel that charges should be waived. ~. We do not feel that our proposed use would have sufficient impact to access a fee. ~. With the use of our existing water and an approved septic system we do not feel an access fee would apply. 6. We do not feel that our proposed use would justify said sidewalk. 7. We do not at this time feel that our endeavor wou~ justify a future commitmeµt towards such charges. ¿~ I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 ~ P & Z Minutes September 22, 1988 ( This was added to the motion. The motion carried 2. PS 88-18 for Lot 1, Block 1, PS 88-18 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 88-18 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tricoli and the motion carried 7-0. 3. PS 88-19 Request of Mildred Kidwell for final plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Kidwell Addition. PS 88-19 TABLED Mr. Barfield made the motion to table PS 88-19 until such time as the 'Engineer's comments are addressed. . This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0. 4. PS 88-21 Consideration of a variance request from Immanuel Lutheran Church on A, Block 7, Holiday Heights A regarding Calloway Branc eek. Mr. Bowen e Commission has a letter fro e Assistant Director of rks which states they do not objection to the additional at this time. PS 88-21 APPROVED Mr. Bowen made the motion to approve PS 88-21 for this addition only; for this single project. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 7-0. I" Ie I I I I I I I 1_ I I I I I I I I_ I ( c City of X6rth Richland Hills, Texas September 15, 1988 REF: PWM-0098-88 Memo to: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities RE: PS 88-19; Final Plat for Lot 1, Block 1, KIDWELL ADDITION I have reviewed the above referenced documents and offer the following comments. 1. The Preliminary and Final Plats were submitted together. All of the comments pertaining to the Preliminary Plat also apply to the Final Plat. In addition, the following comments may be amended in the future, pending the submittal of the above referenced information. 2. Construction plans for offsite and onsite water, sanitary sewer, streets and drainage improvements should be ~ubmitted and approved by Public Works prior to filing the approved Final Plat. 3. Pro rata charges will be due at the current rate for the existing water line in Davis Boulevard. 4. Drainage Impact Fees may be due for the area receiving final platting. 5. Water and Sanitary Sewer Tap Fees as well as Sanitary Sewer System Access Fees should be collected at the current rate. 6. A sidewalk should be constructed along Davis Boulevard as directed by Public Works. 7. A covenant should be signed requlrlng future payment of pro rata charges for the construction of half of Davis Boulevard. ~~ P%~ Xevin B. Miller, P.E. KMB/ds cc: Mr. Danny Taylor, Build~ng Inspection ~r. Greg Dickens, Director of Public Works/Utilities . I' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Economic Development 11/14/88 .pepartment: Council Meeting Date: ... Request of Tar-Two Inc. for Replat of Woodland Oaks PS 88-23 SUbject: Agenda Number: Addition (Previous Nab Hill Addition) This Replat Application is presented for consideration on the entire subdivision. The purpose of the replat is to change the name of the subdivision and establish a twenty foot front building line. The reason given by the applicant for this replat is to improve the market for the lots within the subdivision. All Engineering comments have been met. Based on the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation, Lots 5, 6, 10, 14, 17, and 18 in Block 4 and Lot 11 in Block 2, will require twenty-five foot front building lines, and the remaining lots will have twenty foot setbacks. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Replat Application PS 88-23 subject to the following: 1. Change the subdivision name as per engineers comment. (Woodland Oaks) 2. Change street names to the satisfaction of the City Staff. 3. Grant a variance from the Subdivision Ordinance to allow twenty foot front yard building lines on all lots that have an average depth of one hundred twenty feet or less. Cul-de-sac lots excluded. e RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation regarding approved Replat Application PS 88-23. Finance Review I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other /J. ~ L¿ ~ Departme t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available K ~,/~ City anager . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I' I-I AG R-3 l- Ie I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CI OF NORTH C HILLS, TEXAS OCTOB 27, 1988 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER CONSID ION OF THE MINUTES OBER 13, 1988 ROLL CALL was called to Vice Chairman, Mark Wood, Alt. Member Dir. P & Z Coordinator Mark Wood David Barfield Don Bowen Ron Lueck James Brock David Greene Pat Marin George Tucker Wanda Calvert ABSENT: John Schwinger Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. 1. PS 88-23 Request of Tar-Two Inc. for replat of Woodland Oaks Addition (previous Nob Hill Addition). Vice Chairman Wood opened the Public and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this replat to come forward. Jack Roseberry, 8912 Martin Drive, came forward. He stated he represents Realty Alliance of Texas in requesting to change the name of the subdivision, change the street names and change the set backs. Mr. Roseberry stated he met with several builders and realtors and they feel the name changes are very important, but the most serious is the set backs. He said in the deed restrictions it stated rear or side entry garages. He said they feel it to keep the requirement for side entry garages. I' Page 2 P & Z Minutes October 27, 1988 Ie 11 I 11 I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Mr. Roseberry stated there are several nice subdivisions with 20 foot setbacks. Vice Chairman Wood asked where these subdivisions are located. Mr. Roseberry said the builders did not say where they were located, but he thinks some are in Hurst. Vice Chairman Wood said none are in North Richland Hills. Vice Chairman Wood asked if there is a deed restriction for the house size. Mr. Roseberry said they range from 1800 to 2500 square feet on top of the hill. He said he has sold two building jobs, one for 2500 square feet and the other almost 3,000 square feet. He said the lots on top of the hill have sold first. Vice Chairman Wood asked Mr. Roseberry if granted the 20 foot setback, would he agree to changing the restriction of 1800 square foot houses to 2,000 square foot. 'Mr. Roseberry said it would just ,hinder the sale of so~e of the contracts. He said he was pushing to hurry and get this request to council. Mr. Barfield said changing the 1800 square feet to 2,000 square feet would only affect the lots next to Crane Road. Mr. Roseberry said all the lots they have sold are for 2500 square foot houses or larger. Mr. Lueck asked who Realty Alliance is. He said the application shows Tar-Two Inc. I' Page 3 P & Z Minutes October 27, 1988 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f 1 ( ( Mr. Roseberry said Realty Alliance of Texas is a group of investors and they own Tar-Two Inc. ~ Mr. Barfield said he would abstain his vote since he lives next to this property, but he has some suggestions. He suggests the Commission grant a variance to the setbacks if the lots are less than 120 feet deep. He said he knows this is a hardship and this would not set a precedence. Mr. Roseberry said he has sold 3 hilltop lots which needs the setbacks changed. He said the one house built in the subdivision has very little back yard and they most always want a pool. He said he had some people who looked at 3 different lots and they could not get the house they wanted on either of the lots and have enough room for a swimming pool. Mr. Barfield said he feels the Commission would set a precedence if this is granted on the whole subdivision. Mr. Roseberry said he was told by the t City Attorney the council could change the setbacks. He said we have a very serious problem in this subdivision. Mr. Barfield said for them to look at the plat to see how many lots would be affected if they grant on all lots less than 120 feet deep. There were approximately 9 lots that have a depth of over 120 feet; all others would be granted the variance of 20 foot setbacks. Mr. Roseberry said this would create problems. Vice Chairman Wood said if the Commission gives blanket approval, it will set a precedence for other developers to come in and ask for the same setback. He said the Commission I' Page 4 P & Z Minutes October 27, 1988 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( is in the process of revising the Zoning Ordinance and they will study the need for 20 foot setbacks. He said they may consider changing the Ordinance. John Zimmerman, Engineer, came forward. He said all owners of the lots must sign the plat and if this doesn't go through, they will not sign. Mr. Roseberry said he spoke with the City Attorney to see if this could be done and he said it could. Vice Chairman Wood said Mr. Roseberry is asking the Commission to set a precedence for the whole city. Mr. Roseberry said they would live with whatever the Commission decides. He said there are problems with the street names. He said he is not trying to create problems. Mr. Roseberry said he may have talked to the wrong people, he may should have had a work session with Planning and Zoning, but if there are any hurt feelings, he is sorry. Vice Chairman Wood stated no feelings are hurt, but the Commission does not want to set a precedence; the Commission needs to study the matter. Mr. Zimmerman said they would resolve the problem with the street names before going to council. Vice Chairman Wood called for those wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Vice Chairman closed the Public Hearing. I' Page 5 p & Z Minutes October 27, 1988 Ie II I I I I I I Ie I PS 88-23 APPROVED ADJOURNMENT I I I I I I I" ( Secretary Planning and Zoning Commission ( Mr. Barfield had earlier wanted to abstain from voting, but had participated in the discussion. Mr. Tucker stated that since discussion was held with all members, all members must vote. Mr. Barfield made the motion to approve PS 88-23 subject to the following: 1. Change the Subdivision name. 2. Street names be changed to the satisfaction of City Staff before submission to council. 3. A 20 foot front yard setback be established on all lots that have an average depth of 120 feet or less. CuI de sacs do not count. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:10 P. M. Vice Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I ( ( JOHN D. ZIMMERMAN P.E., R.P.S. REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR 2300 ROOSEVELT DR. UNIT C ARLINeTON. TEXAS 78018 (817) 481-0188 October 19, 1988 City of North Richland Hills 7301 NE Loop 820 P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission Re: Woodland Oaks, Replat of Nob Hill Addition, Block 1-4, Comment Hemos to Planning and Zoning Commission from City Staff. Comments from Kevin B. Miller P.E., Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities. 1_ Drafting errors have been corrected and a copy closure sheet is enclosed~ Note: The metes and reflect as found measurement· in the field at the staking. of the bounds time of 2. The building set back lines were reduced to provide a more buildable lot. The houses are rear entry for the most part. The request is to provide a minimum building line of 20 feet with a greater building line on the cul-de-sac's to provide a minumum of 70 foot frontage at the line. 3. Corrected to Woodland Oaks. 4. All owners signatures will be obtained. s. No response required. 6,. Marked up copy to be returned with corrections. Comments from J. L. McGlasson, Police Chief- Street name opposition to be resolved with the City Staff. Comments from Stan Gertz, Fire Chief, owner's request appropriate street name changes consistent with resolution of comment from Police Chief. ~ man P _ E., R _ P _ S _ I' Ie I I I I I I I 1_ I I I I I I I I" I ( ( City of J(ðrth Richland Hills, Texas ~/\1_ -p 'N.. =-- October 18, 1988 REF: P~~-0099-88 o Memo to: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Kevin B. Miller, P.E. Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities RE: WOODLAND OAKS; Replat of Nob Hill Addition, Blocks 1-4 PS 88-23 1. The metes and bounds description does not match the drawing. Neither description provides adequate closure. There are several recommended changes included on the attached markup, however the surveyor is ultimately responsible for providing a plat which closes within accepted tolerances. 2. ~1any of the building setback lines have been reduced from 25 feet to 20 feet. 3. The title should be revised to "'~OODLAND OAKS" rather than "WOODLANDS OAKS" . 4. If any of the lots have been sol~, then all current property owners must sign the plat. 5. All streets and utilities are existing. No pro rata or construction is required. 6. The attached markup should be returne~ with the next submittal. ~gf?~ Kevin B. Miller, P.E. KBM/ds cc: Mr. Gregory W. Dickens, Director of Public Works/Utilities Mr. George Tucker, Director of Planning (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TX 76118 I' Ie I TO FROM I SUBJECT: I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I" I ( ( INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM C. A. Sanford, Econ. Dvlp. Director REF: PDMIIOl/88/586 Chief J. L. McGlasson DA TE: September 29, 1988 Street names for Woodland Oaks ~ Dear C. A.; My staff has reviewed the proposed replat of the Woodland Oaks Addition and have voiced opposition to the following proposed street names: Wood Crest Drive Wood Crest Court Ridge Hill Drive Wood Ridge Drive North Meadow Drive These objections are based on the many similar sounding street names already in the City. Between "Wood", "Ridge", and "Meadow", we presently have twenty-seven streets with these as a part of their name. From a Public Safety standpoint, we would urge the developer to submit other street names. If you should have further questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, J1lfví! MCGla~~ of Police I" I- I TO I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I FROM ( ( FIRE DEPARTMENT REFERENCE I 88-312 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM WANDA CALVERT, STAN GERTZ, DATE OCTOBER 5, 1988 SUBJECT REPLAT OF NOB HILL The Fire Department does not like any changes in the Nab Hill {j Addition as those street names have already been entered in the dispatcher street index, the Police Department computer dispatch system and in the 911 system computer as this would require a great deal of work and time in making these changes. All city maps would have to be changed, not to mention the fire apparatus assignments pertaining to emergency calls. If you have any questions, please contact myself or Lieutenant Gary Ingram at 281-8393. SRG:cb I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IL- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Economic Development 11/14/88 Department: Council Meeting Date: Appointment of an Ad Hoc Committee for Golf Course GN 88-103 Agenda Number: Subject: Construction We are at the point in our golf course development where there will be a number of decisions. Marty Streiff and the City Staff will need direction so we would like to suggest that the Council appoint an AD Hoc Committee consisting of the Mayor, Mayor Pro-Tem, and a Council Person to give direction during construction. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that an Ad Hoc Committee be appointed to give direction during construction. Source of Funds: Bond~. fRev.) Opera dget Othe t Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available tel1 '-~ I 'C.~M . Ity . anaJer , Finance Director f - I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Economic Development aPepartment: ~ Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a New Subject: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I fl Subdivision Ordinance. 11/14/88 Council Meeting Date: GN 88- 104 Agenda Number: On September 8, 1988, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a Public Hearing on the Subdivision Ordinance and now submit the approved revisions for City Council action. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should hold the required public hearing and act upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Cð Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available /J ;<'f;/~~ nt Head Signature . ity Manager CITY COllf\JCIL ACTICt\! ITE!'w?1 , Finance Director I Page 7 P & Z Minutes October 13, 1988 ( ( Ie I There being no the Chairman He I I Mr. Lueck made the motion to approve PZ 88-19. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. 8. PS 88-16 Recommendation for adoption of amended Subdivision Ordinance. I PS 88-16 Mr. Wood made the motion to recommend approval to the City Council as revised in the Master copy. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. I I I Ms. Donnelle Moore, 6032 Holiday Lane, requested to speak. She stated that 3 years ago at a City Council meeti it was said that Holiday Lane wa going to 4 lanes and would be straightened out. Ms. Moo said she wrote two letters to the 1ty Council and Planning and Zoni to see what the status was, bu ever received an answer so she de äed to come to the meeting. I Ie I lived north or I . Moore said north. She said there 17 houses that face Holiday Lane and if they wIden it, it would be another Rufe Snow. I I Mr. Tucker stated this Commission is going to look at the Thoroughfare Plan. He said the staff has recommended Holiday Lane be changed to an extra wide 2 lane street. Mr. Tucker said Public Works is looking at ways to help move the traffic. He said the City 1s trying to get right of way from Industrial Park Boulevard to Holiday Lane for another way out to Watauga Road. I I t I J I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Page 3 P & Z Minutes September 22, 1988 5. PS 88-16 Recommendation for adoption of amended Subdivision Ordinance. PS 88-16 Mr. Barfield stated that since there needs to be more study on this, he recommended that they table this until they can have a thorough study of this ordinance. This motion was seconded by Mr. Bowen and the motion carried 7-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:40 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I Page 6 p & Z Minutes September 8, 1988 5. PS 88-16 ADJOURNMENT ( ( Public Hearing on revisions to the Subdivision Ordinance. Chairman Schwinger opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak to please come forward. Mr. Tucker stated this revision is just to bring it up to date. He said they are not changing very much, but will have a little better control. Mr. Tucker said the old ordinance has technical things such as how to build curbs, streets, lay water lines, etc. He said this will be put in a Design Manual which will be a separate document. He said it will be approved by the City Council by resolution. Mr. Tucker said this will be a more flexible ordinance. He said we have reviewed it with Engineers and people who have to use it everyday and we have tried to streamline it. Mr. , Tucker said it still grants the Planning and Zoning Commission the right to variances and the City Council the right to hear appeals. He said this is a housekeeping job. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public ,Hearing. The meeting adjourned at 8:00 P.M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~Department: I SUbject: Economic Development 11/14/88 Council Meeting Date: Consider Adoption of a New Subdivision Ordinance Agenda Number:GN 88-105 Ordinance No. 1579 I Over the past several months the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Staff have been involved in a rewrite of the Subdivision Ordinance. Working in harmony with Engineers who practice in the City of North Richland Hills, the Commission has created a new Subdivision Ordinance. The Commission felt that a new Ordinance was needed in lieu of revising the old Ordinance. The new Ordinance, as presented, removes Technical requirements from the Ordinance and places these requirements into a Design Manual. The Commission felt that this action would give the City more flexibility in maintaining up to date design standards. The Commission is recommending that the Council adopt the Design Manual by Resolution in lieu of an Ordinance. Flexibility is thereby gained as changes to the Technical Design Manual can be made without going through the long process of passing an amending Ordinance. I I I I I The Commission wishes to focus Council attention to Section 1-01, subsection D, Paragraph 1, which will allow owners of unplatted property to make repairs and remodel with limitations without platting their property. This rewrite is a complete departure from the present Ordinance. The Commission, however, felt that the City was unduly penalizing homeowners who, under the present Ordinance, could not make a minor repair without spending $1000 to $1,500 to plat their property. -- I I RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the proposed Subdivision Ordinance be approved as submitted. I I I Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available /e 11 \/~ City Manager t Finance Director CIT" C -"~.. feÞ' ~ C: ,I!. !~ t-';' t) ;~! / T Er~,,: .-'.--. -,..~-~_. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. An Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, providing subdivision regulations for the platting and developing of subdivisions within the limits of the City of North Richland Hills and for such other areas as may be authorized by State Statutes; providing a severability clause; and providing the effective date. WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills to promote the orderly growth of the City in conformance with the adopted Master Plan for the City and to insure the health, safety, and weHare of its citizens; and WHEREAS, the present rules and regulations of the City of North Richland Hills regulating the platting and developing of subdivisions have become obsolete and therefore may be inadequate to protect the publiC interest; and WHE REA S, after holding public hearings as stipulated by the Charter of the City, it is the opinion of the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills that the fonowing subdivisiDn regulations should be adopted; NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills that the attached Subdivision Regulations be and the same are hereby adopted as the Rules and Regulations for the platting and subdivision of land within the City of North Richland Hills and within its extraterritorial jurisdiction. The at~ached "Subdivision Regulations are made a part of this Ordinance the same ~s if set out verbatim in the Ordinance". SEVERABILITY CLAUSE Should any portion or part of this Ordinance be held for any reason invalid or unenforceable, the same shall not be construed to affect any other valid portion hereof, but all valid portions hereof shall remain in full force an d effect. PEN ALTIES A violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall be a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand ($1000) dollars. Any person who shall violate any provision of this Ordinance shall. be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day that such violation shall continue. The City shall. have the right to institute an action in the District Court to enjoin the violation of any provision of such Ordinance in its extraterritorial jurisdiction and the District Court shall have the power to grant any or all types of injunctive re11ef in such cases. The City shall. have the right to enforce the Ordinance in its entirety by Civil Suit. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS DAY OF October , 1988 ~~ 13th I' ~ , Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission PASSED AND APPROVED THIS ATTEST: DAY OF , 1988. Mayor Jeane"tte Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CITY OF NO R TH RIC HLAND HILLS SUBDIVISION RULES AND REGULATIONS ADOPTED , ~88 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PROVIDING FOR ORDINANCE Effective Time and Status ADOPTION DATE PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS SE C TIO N 1-01 - GENE RAL Interpretation Purpose Definition s S p ecialProvision s Improvements Variances SECTION 1-02 - PRELIMINARY PLAT General Place for Filing and Copies Required Form and Content Processing of Preliminary Plats SECTION 1-03 - FIN,AL PLAT AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS General Time and Place for Filing Form and Content Processing of Final Plat and Construction Plans SECTION 1-04 - RE-PLATS Ownership . Procedures SECTION 1-05 - SHORT FORM PLATS SECTION 1-06 CITY DEVELOPER AGREEMENTS SECTION 1-07 CONTRACTING CON'STRUCTION Procedure C:i1:y Participation SECTION 1-08 STREET AND EASEMENT VACATIONS Procedure 1-2 3 4 5-9 5 5 5 8 8 9 10-13 10 10 10 12 14-18 14 14 14 17 19-20 19 19 21 22-25 26 26 26 27-28 27 I Ie I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS SECTION 1-01 GENERAL I A. INTERPRETATION I In the interpretation and application of the provisions of these regulations, it is the intention of the City C ounci! that the principles, standards and requirements provided herein shall be the minimum requirements for the platting and developing of sub divisions in the City of North Richland Hills. I B. PURPOSE I I The purpose of this Ordinance is to provide for the orderly, safe and healthful development of the area within the City and within the surrounding area to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the community; to insure orderly growth of the City by promoting conformance of proposed development with the adopted Master Plan of the City. I C. DE FINITIO N S Ie For the purpose of this Ordinance, the following terms, phrases, words, and other derivations shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section: I Alley: A minor public right-of-way, not intended to provide the primary means of access of abutting lots, which is used primarily for vehicular service access to the back or sides of properties otherwise abutting on a street. I Building Setback Line: The line within a property defining the minimum horizontal distance between a building or other structure over 24" high and the adjacent street property line. j I City: The City of North Richland Hills, Texas I I City Engineer: A Registered Professional Engineer on the City Staff or firm of Registered Professional Consulting Engineers who have specifically been designated as representing the City by Resolution of the City Council. Commission: The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City. I I Ie I Crosswalk Way: A public right-of-way, four (4) feet or more in width between property lines, which provides pedestrian circulation. Cul-de-sac: 'A street having but one outlet to another street, and terminated on the opposite end by a vehicular turnaround. Dead-End Street: A street, other than a cul-de-sac, with only one outlet. I I_ I Engineer: A person duly authorized under the provisions of the Texas Engineering Registration Act, as heretofore or hereafter amended, to practice the profession of Civil Engineering. I Final Plat: (Also Record Plat or Filing Plat) The one official and authentic map of any given subdivision of land prepared from actual field measurement and staking of all identifiable points by a Registered or Licensed Surveyor with the sub division location properly referenced to a survey corner or specific landmark reference. All boundaries, corners and curves of the land division shall be sufficiently described so that they can be reproduced without additional references. I Land Planner: Persons other than Surveyors or Engineers who also possess and can demonstrate a valid proficiency in the Planning of residential, commercial, industrial and other related developments; such proficiency having been acquired by education in the field of Planning or Landscape Architecture and/or by other actual experience and practice in the field of land planning. I I Land Use Plan: A map of the City containing a graphic representation of the proposed uses of the various land areas of the City. I Lot: An undivided tract or parcel of land having frontage on a public street or approved public access easement and which is, or in the future may be offered for sale, conveyance, transfer or improvement; which is designated as a distinct and separate tract, and which is ident:ified by a tract or lot number or symbol in a duly approved subdivision plat which has been properly filed or recorded. I 1_ I Master Plan: The officially adopted Comprehensive Master Plan for the City of North Richland Hills. I Design Manual: Refers to the North Richland Hills Public Works Design Manual. This is a separate document which establishes minimum criteria for approvab1e design of Public Works/Utilities Improvements for the City of North Richland Hills. I Neigh borhood Park: Parks providing for a variety of outdoor recreational opportunities and within convenie~t distances from a majority of the residences to be served thereby. I Pavement Width: The portion of a street available for vehicular traffic. Where curbs are installed, it is the portion of the street between the faces of the curbs. I Person: Any individ ual, association, firm, corporation, governmental agency, or political subdivision. I Preliminary Plat: (Also Preliminary Development Study, Overall Plan of Development, etc.) The graphic expression of the proposed overall plan for subdividing, improving and developing a tract shown by superimposin'g a scale drawing of the proposed land division on a topographic map and showing in plan existing and proposed drainage I I_ ii I I_ I features and faci1it:i.es, street layout and direction of curb water flow, and other pertinent features with notations sufficient to su bstantially identify the general scope and d-eta:il of the proposed development. Replat: A Platting act:iDn submitted for the purpose of sub dividing an existing recorded Lot or Tract into smaller lots or to re-combine smaller existing recorded lots or tracts into a larger tract. I Shall, May: The word "shall" is always mandatory. The word "may" is merely directory. I Street: AJ public right-of-way, however designated, which provides vehicular access to adjacent lands. In accordance with the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City, certain spec:i.fic streets may be designated under the following criteria based upon their traffic capacllies. I I I (1) Major thoroughfares provide vehicular movement from one neighborhood to another, to distant points within the prban Area or to Freeways or Highways leading to other communities. I (2) Collector Streets provide vehicular circulation within neighborhoods and from minor streets to major thorou g hfares . I (3) Local Residential Streets are primarily for providing direct vehicular access to abutting properties. 1_ Subdivider: Any person or any agent thereof, dividing or proposing to divide land so as to constitute a sub division as that term is defined herein. In any event, the term "subdivider" shall be restricted to include only the owner, eq uitable owner or authorized agent of such owner or equitable owner, of land sought to be sub divided. I I Subdivision: A division of any tract of land situated within the corporate limits of the City ~ or within the extra-territorial jurisdiction of su~h limits, in one 'or more parts for the purpose of creating lots for sale, for the purpose of identification, and/or to provide for the dedication of streets, alleys a~d easements. I I Subdivision includes re-sub division (replat), but it does not include the divisions of land for agriculture purposes in parcels or tracts of five (5) acres or more not involving any new street, alley or easement. I Surveyor: A licensed State Land Surveyor or a Reg~tered Public Surveyor, as authorized by the applicable State Statutes to practice the profession of surveying. I I I_ I Ut::iJity Easement: An interest in land granted to the City, to the public generally, and/or to a private uti1ity corporation, for installing and maintaining uti1ities across, over or under private land, together with the right to enter thereon with machinery and vehicles necessary for the maintenance of said utilities. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Any office referred to in this 0 rdinance by title means the person employed or appointed by the City in that position, or his duly authorized representative. Definitions not expressly prescribed herein are to be construed in accordance with customary usage in municipal planning and engineering practices. D. SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. No Building Permit for new construction shall be issued by the City for any structure on a lot in a subdivision, or on any parcel of property for which a Final Plat has not been approved and filed for record. New Construction being defined as "total new structure or remodel which exceeds fifty (50) percent of current value of existing structuretl. 2. In residential subdivisions, Building Permits will not be issued until all public fa~es approved in the construction plans have been insbiUed and inspected by the Pu~1ic Works Department. 3. In commercial and industrial subdivisions, Building Permits may be issued upon completion of the ut:lli.ty systems to a point where required fire hydrants and fire protection systems have been installed and are functional to provide protection for the buildings under construction. In cases where Building Permits are issued priDr to all public facilities being completed, no Certificate of Occupancy for any building will be issued until such time as all construction of public faci1ities has been completed and accepted by the Public Works Department. 4. The City will not issue bùilding permits on any subdivision which remains unapproved by the Public Works Department for a period of four years or more from the date of the Final Plat approval until a current engineering review of said plat has been conducted. 5. Construction shall not start on any street, sidewalk, drainage, utility or public improvement until a Public Works Construction Permit and an acceptable two (2) year maintenance bond has been issued for all facilities in the subdivision or the approved phase of the said subdivis~n. 6. Upon approved completion of the construètion of the public facili1:i.es, the developer's engineer shall submit to the Public Works Department a complete set of "as-built" documents of the project along with a complete accounting of all constructiDn units "as-built" and the total project cost. The Public Works Department will then issue a formal letter of acceptance for the subdivision. E. IMPROVEMENTS The Subdivider shall observe all the requirements and principles of land subdivision and street layout as contained in this Ordinance. The overall plan of any proposed subdivision shall. be in conformance with the general layout of the City of North 'Richland H:Ills Master Plan as adopted by the City Council. I I The subdivider shall furnish, install and/or construct the water and sewerage systems and the street and drainage facili.ties necessary for the proper development of the subdivision. All such facilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the Design Manual. Where considered necessary by the Public Works Director or City Engineer, the facilities shall be sized in excess of that dictated by the Design Manual, to provide for the future growth and expansion of the City systems. The City may participate in such oversized facili.ties provided funds are avai1able. I_ I I When a tract of land is proposed for development and public improvements are to be installed between or paralleling two or more tracts of land under different ownership and participation is required by both owners, the developer desiring to plat his land first shall: I 1. If the improvements are required for the actual development of the subdivision then the first developer shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary right of way or easements from the adjoining property owner or owners and for installing those improvements at his own expense. I I 2. If the improvements are not required for the actual development of the subdivision then the developer shall provide all of the easements or right of way necessary for the improvements contained within his subdivision. In addition, the first developer shall also pay to the City an amount of money sufficient to cover his share of the costs of the future construction of the offsite improvements as determined by the Director of Public Works. I 1_ 3. When a tract of land is developed and there are border existing traffic carrying streets which requires improvements an/or additional right of way by the City Master Plan, the first Developer is required to provide his portion of these improvements within the limits of his own subdivision. The first Developer is not required to obtain future right-of-way from the owner across such existing streets; however, if ownership of land on both sides of existing streets is the same, then the Developer is required to provide all right-of-way and improvements as required to meet further City needs. I I I F. VARIANCES I The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend certain deviations to the Ordinance which are deemed to be in the best interest of the City and the City Council may approve a variance from these subdivision regulations authorizing the deviations when, in its opinion, strict compliance with the Ordinance would not serve the public need. I I I I_ I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I SE C TIO N 1-02 PRELIMINARY PLAT A. GENERAL The subdivider shall cause to be prepared a preliminary plan by an Engineer, Land Planner or Surveyor in accordance with this Ordinance and as shown on the following page. A Preliminary (Or Overall) Plan of Development shall show all the planning factors necessary to enable the Planning and Zoning Commission to determine whether the proposed plan for subdivision and development is satisfactory from the standpoint of public interest and in accordance with the planning standards of the Master Plan and the Zoning Ordinance as well as the provisions of this 0 rdinance. The "Overall Plan of Develop ment" shall be prepared by a qualified professional trained and experienced in subdivision design, and particularly shall include a preliminary drainage study by a registered professional engineer. B. PLACE FOR FILING AND COPIES REQUIRED The subdivider shall file the Preliminary Plat with the City by completing the Preliminary Plat Application and Checklist and submitting the appropriate filing fees to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator. C . FORM AND CONTENT The Plat shall be drawn on sheets which are a maximum of 24" X 36" in size, with a binding margin of not less than 1-1/2" on the left side of the sheet. The plat shall be drawn at 'a numerical scale no greater than 1" = 100'. At the Engineer's discretion the plat may be drawn at a numerically smaller scale, i.e., 1" = 50', 1" = 40', etc. if the plat can still be drawn on the required 24" x 36" sheet size including all titles, dedications and other required data. Whenever the size of the subdivision is such that the full area cannot be covered on a single sheet with space for titles and other required identification, the plat may be drawn on a number of separate sheets w:it:h matching lines to facilitate the joining of the individ ual sheets together as a composite drawing. Where more than one sheet is so used, they shall also be accompanied by a composite drawing of the individual sheets reduced in scale so to f:it: on a single sheet to serve as a gènerallocation map of the project. The Preliminary Plat shall show the following: 1. Proposed name of the subdivision, which shall not be a duplication of any existing subdivision name, whether by spelling or pronunciation, or any other subdivisiDn w:it:hin the City or within its extraterritorial jurisdiction, unless the proposed subdivision is a subsequent filing or replat of the existing sub division. 2. Names and addresses of the developer/subdivider, record owner, engineer, land planner, and surveyor. 3. The location and dimensions of all proposed streets, alleys, blocks, lots, parks, other public areas, reservations, easements or other right of way within the subdivision. Such locations and dimensions shown on the plat shall I Ie I be given in sufficient detail to show compliance with the requirements of the Ordinance and with the provisions of the City Zoning Ordinance in respect to the size and orientation of the lots as required by the zoning of the subject tract. 4. Names of contiguous subdivis:IDns and the plat layout of such su b divisions. I 5. The current zoning of the proposed subdivision and all adjacent tracts and/or subdivisions surrounding the proposed subdivision. I 6. Lot sizes and dimensions shall be given in sufficient detail to verify compliance with the specific req uirements of the Zoning District(s) on the property. I 7. Description, by metes and bounds, of the subdivision boundary and locate the tract to be subdivided on a location map at a scale of 1" = 1,000' or 1" = 2000', which shall show the existing subdivisions, streets, easements, rights-of-way, parks and public facilities in the vicinity. The proposed subdivision, boundary lines shall be delineated on the Preliminary Plat in heavy lines to provide a differentiation as to the area proposed for platting. The acreage of the total area of the proposed plat shall be shown prominently on the plat. I I I 8. Existing site features of the area shall be shown as follows: Ie (a) The location and name of all existing or recorded streets, alleys, reservations, easements or other public right of way within the subdivision, intersecting or contiguous with its boundaries or forming such boundaries. I (b) The location, dimensions, and name of all existing or recorded residential lots, parks, public areas, permanent structures and other sites within or contiguous with the subdivision. I 9. The location and flow line of existing water courses and drainage structures within the subdivision and/or contiguous tracts where the contiguous properties will affect the ,drainage design of the proposed subdivision or the drainage system of the proposed subdivision will affect the contiguous properties. j I I 10. Topographical information shall include contour lines on a basis of two (2') vertical feet or less. Data from City Topo Maps will be acceptable where available. Data from US GA Quad sheet with interpertations to two (2) feet contours will be acceptable where city topo maps are not available. I Any off-site or adjoining areas outside the limits of the area to be platted which are relevant to drainage shall have similar topography or otherwise shall be level surveyed to give reasonable verification of the limits of such off-site drainage areas, and all such off-site drainage areas shall be shown on the drainage plan. The datum for all topography shall be that of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey, City of North Richland Hills datum or other recognized datum source as approved by the City, with contours I I Ie II I Ie I developed from field level surveys or from approved aerial photogrammetric interpretation of contours based on the proper control data. Topography shall be sufficiently detailed to establish all drainage areas (and subareas). Delineation of drainage areas and all. flow arrows shown should represent flow pattern of runoff after all proposed improvements have been installed and all. lots have been developed. ProfessiDnals with responsibility for accuracy of topography shall affix their professional seal on the drainage plan along with a signed certificate of responsibility for the topography and delineation of the drainage areas. (See Example Below). I I I I, , a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Texas, have prepared this drainage study in compliance with the latest published requirements and criteria of the City of North Richland Hills, and have verified that the topographic information used in this study is in compliance with said requirements and is otherwise suitable for developing this workable overall. Plan of Drainage which can be implemented through proper subsequent detailed construction planning. I SIGNATURE I , P. E., SEAL 11. A number or letter to identify each lot or tract and each block. I 12. A developer desiring to submit a Final Plat for any parcel or tract of land, must first submit a Preliminary Plat of all contiguous lands owned by him or under interlocking ownership within which the tract proposed for final platting is located. The limits of the required Preliminary Plat may be reduced by authorization of the Economic Development Department if the reduced limits of the preliminary pI.àtting are reasonable and consistent with the City's planning objectives. Thè Preliminary Plat shall include a layout of the entire area showing the tentative proposed layout of streets, blocks, drainage, water, sewer and other future improvements for such areas. If desired by the subdivider, the Preliminary Plat may indicate how the subdivision is to be phased for final platting. The overall. layout, if approved by the Commission, shall be attached to and filed with a copy of the approved Final Plat in the permanent files of the City. Thereafter, plats of subsequent units of such subdivision, shall. conform to such, approved overall layout and phasing, unless a new Preliminary Plat is sub mitted and approved by the Commission. Ie I I I I 13. Front building set-back lines should be shown on all. lots or tracts in accordance with the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance for the proper districts(s). Side yard building set-back lines should be shown on side yards of lots with side street frontage. I I I Ie I 14. The Preliminary calculation of the drainage areas and run-off showing design storm frequency and other appropriate design criteria. D. PROCESSING OF PRELIMINARY PLATS 1. Upon receipt of the Preliminary Plat and the required Engineering Plans with the necessary filing fees, the Director of Economic Development I Ie I or his designee shall check the Preliminary Plat as to its conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, lot size requirements, subdivision and street names and other applicable City standards. The Director of Economic Development shall provide a written critique of the plat for the use of the applicant and his engineer. I 2. The Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall refer a copy of the Preliminary Plat and the Engineering Plans to the Public Works Department for review of the conformance of the plans to the standards and specifications of this Ordinance. The Public Works Department shall prepare a written critique of the engineering plans which shall be returned to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator for distribution to the applicant and his engineer in conjunction with the review comments of the Director of Economic Develop mente I I 3. A cop y of all Preliminary Plats shall be sen t to the v ariou s franchise ut:ili.t:ies doing business in the City to solicit their com ments regarding the need for easements, right of way, etc. I 4. After the applicant and his engineer are provided a copy of the Staff comments on the plat and the Public Works Department/City's Engineer's com ments on the engineering plans, the applicant and his engineer shall respond to the com ments in writing. The Preliminary Plat and the written com ments from the City Staff along with the response from the sub divider and his engineer shall comprise the docket material for the consideration of the Planning and Zoning Commission along with any other pertinent data which the C'ity Staff shall assem ble for the use of the Planning and Zoning Com mission. I I Ie 5. When all requirements are' completed or if the necessary requirements can be stipulated to be provided on the Final Plat, the Commission may consider the plat at the next ava:i.lable regularly scheduled Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. I I 6. Once Preliminary Plat approval has been given by the Planning and Zoning Commission the applicant may proceed with preparation and submittal of a Final Plat Application. If a Final Plat Application has not been submitted on at least a portion of the area covered by the Preliminary Plat within one (1) year from the date of the approval of the Preliminary ~lat by the Com mission, the Preliminary Plat becomes n un and yoid. If in the event that only a portion of the Preliminary Plat has been submitted for Final Plat action, those areas not platted within three (3) years of the date of Preliminary Plat approval shall be null and void unless an extension of time is granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission. I I I I I Ie I I SECTION 1-03 Ie I FINAL PLAT AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS A. GENERAL I I No subdivision of land shall be accomplished w:i1:hout proper subm:i1:tal, approval and adoption of a Final Plat in accordance with this Ordinance and in conformance with the Master Plan of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. The Final Plat must be prepared and sealed by a registered Public Surveyor and must be accompanied by the necessary engineering construction plans, prepared and sealed by a Registered Professional Engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Texas and must be representative of the layout and configuration as approved in the Preliminary Plat. I B. TIME AND PLACE FOR FILING I The subdivider shall file the Final Plat by submittal of the completed Final Plat Application and Checklist along with the necessary copies of the plat and engineering. plans to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator with the req uired fees. The deposit of and acceptance of the fees shall constitute formal request for plat consideration. I C. FORM AND CONTENT I 1. The final plat and accompanying data shall conform to the Preliminary Plat as approved by the Commission incorporating any and all changes, modifications, alterations, corrections and stipulations imposed by the Commission. Only those portions of the Preliminary Plat constituting a full phase may be submitted as a F~al Plat. Ie I 2. The final plat shall be drawn on individual sheets not exceeding 24 inches X 36 inches in size with a left hand margin of 1-1/2 inches. The Plat shall be drawn to a scale of one (1) inch = 100 feet or greater. Where the entire plat cannot be drawn on a single page, the plat may be placed on multiple sheets. In this instance an index sheet or drawing of the entire subdivision, at an appropriate scale shall be included. I I 3. Final Plat In addit:ion to the various requirements for the P,re1iminary Plat, the shall also include the following: (a) Proposed name of subdivision, indicating j£ the proposed subdivision is an extension or subsequent filing of an existing subdivision. (b) Owner's acknowledgement and subdivision dedication. (see example below). The dedication shall contain an exact metes and bounds description of the plat being submitted. The boundary Jines of the proposed subdivision shall be delineated on the Final Plat in heavy lines and the metes and bounds description of each line shall be inscribed thereon. (c) The exact location, dimensions, name and description of all existing or recorded streets, alleys, reservations, easements, or other public right of way within the subdivision, intersecting or contiguous with its boundary or forming such boundary, with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflecting angles and curve data as required to adequately describe such features. I I I I Ie I I I (d) The exact location, dimensions, description and name of all proposed streets, alleys, drainage, right of way, parks, other public areas, reservations, easement or other right of way, blocks, lots and other tracts within the sub division with accurate dimensions, bearings, or deflecting angles and curve data as required to adequately describe such features. On plats of commercial properties under development, the plat shall include the location and description of fire lanes and emergency access easements as required by the Fire Prevention Code of the City. (e) General easements for the use of public utilities of not less than seven and one-half (7.5') feet in width shall be provided on each side of all rear property lines. If necessary for the extension of water or sewer mains, storm drainage or other utilities, easements of greater width may be required along lot lines or across lots. In all cases, easements shall connect with easements already established in adjoining properties or extend to connect with public right of way. (f) Surveyor's Certificate with seal for Plat (See example below) and Engineer's seal for Construction Plans. (g) A statement noting the Planning and Zoning Commission's approval with appropriate blanks for signatures. (See example below). The size of the Commission acknowledgement shall be a minimum two (2) inches by four (4) inches. (h) A statement noting the City Council's approval with the appropriate blanks for signatures. (See example below). The size of the City Council acknowledgement shall be a minimum two (2) inches by four (4) inches. Ie I I I I I I Ie STATE OF TEXAS § I OWNER'S' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND DEDICATION COUNTY OF § I I (we), the undersigned, owner (s) of the land shown on this plat within the area described by metes and bounds as follows: (Metes and Bounds Description of Boundary) I and designated herein as the subdivision to the City of North Richland Hflls, Texas, and whose name is subscribed hereto, hereby dedicate to the use of the public forever all streets, alleys, parks, water courses, drains, easements, rights-of-way and public places thereon shown for the purpose and uses therein expressed or shown on the plat. I I Owner I STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF § § I Ie I BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared , known to me to be the person (8) whose name (s) is (are) subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I acknowledged to me that (he) (she) (they) executed the same for the purposes "and considerations therein stated. Given under my hand and seal of office this 19 day of Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My Com mission expires , 19 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF § § CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR WHO PREPARED PLAT I, the undersigned, a (registered public surveyor/licensed land surveyor) in the State of Texas, hereby certify that this plat is true and correct and was prepared from an actual ground survey of the property made under my supervision. (Surveyor's Seal) Registered Public Surveyor or Licensed Land Surveyor THE PLANNIN G AND Z ONIN G COMMISSION OF NORTH RIC HLA ND HILLS 0 N (date) 19____ VOTED AFFIRMATIVELY TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS BY THE CITY COUNCIL' THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ON (date) , 19_, VOTED AFFIRMATIVELY TO APPROVE THIS PLAT FOR FILING OF RECORD PLAT BY: BY: C H AIRMA N MAYOR ATTEST: ATTEST: SECRETARY CITY SECRETARY Recommend Adoption by Planning and Zoning C om mission. Statement of Adoption by City Council. (i) Complete construction plans shall. be submitted for all water, sanitary sewer, street and drainage improvements, alleys, and sidewalks, if any, and other improvements to be constructed. I Ie I These plans shall be submitted in accordance with the design manual and shall be subject to the approval of the Public Works Department. E. PROCESSING OF FINAL PLAT AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS I 1. An applicant wishing to have a Final Plat considered must submit a completed Final Plat application and Checklist and the necessary filing fees accompanied by the appropriate number of copies of the Final Plat and Engineering Construction Plans (refer to the design manual for the appropriate format) for the proposed subdivision. Acceptance of these documents will constitute an official filing of the Final Plat for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. I I I 2. Upon receipt of the Final Plat with Construction Plans and the required filing fees together with the completed Application and Checklist Forms, the Director of Economic Development or his designated subordinate shall check the plat as to its conformity with the City's Comprehensiv'e Plan, Land Use Plan, Zoning Districts, lot size requirements, subdivision and street names and other applicable City Standards. I 3. No subdivision plat shall be submitted to the City Council for final approval unless and until all taxes, assessment, charges and other monetary obligations due to the City of North Richland Hills and currently outstanding on the property are paid. Receipts of such payment must be submitted with the Final Plat application to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator. I Ie 4. The Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall transmit one (1) copy of the final plat and construction plans to the Public Works Department for review as to the conformity with applicable engineering standards and specifications set forth herein as will as with generally accepted engineering principles. The Public Works Department shall return the plans to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator with their suggestions as to modifications, additions, alterations or other matters pertinent to the plat and plans. I I 5. The Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall provide to the applicant and his engineer the written critiq ue of the Economic Develop ment Department and the Public Works Department. The applicant will be required to provide written response to all the Staff com ~ents as to his compliance, modifications of the plans, and alterations made to satisfy the St,aff comments. The Final Plat and the written com ments from the City Staff along with the response from the subdivider and. his engineer shall comprise the docket material for the consideration of the Planning and Zoning Commission along with any other pertinent data which the City Staff shall assemble for the use of the Planning and Zoning Commission. I I I 6. At the next available regularly sched uled Planning and Zoning Commission meeting the Commission may take action on the plat, if all requirements and City comments are completed. The Commission shall then forward the plat to the City Council with the Commission recommendation for approval or with enumerated stipulations. I I Ie I I I 7. In the event that the Commission determines that a Final Plat is not in compliance with the Ordinance or does not meet the necessary criteria for approval, the Commission shall disapprove the Final Plat. Disapproval by the Commission shall be final and no recommendation will be sent to City Counc:il. Should an applicant desire to appeal the action of the Planning and Zoning Commission he may file a notice of appeal with the Planning and Zoning Coordinator within ten (10) days of the hearing before the Commission in which the denial action was taken. The Planning and Zoning Coordinator will schedule the appeal hearing before the City Counc:il at the next avallable City Council agenda. Ie I I 8. Disapproval of a plat by the Commission and the City Council shall be deemed a refusal by the City to accept the offered dedications shown thereon. I 9. The City Council may schedule the plat for hearing at its next avallable regularly scheduled agenda. All docket materials which were submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration along with a Staff Report Cover Sheet indicating the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall comprise the agenda material provided for the City Council hearing. The City Counc:il may approve the submitted Final Plat, deny the plat or approve the plat with stipulations. The action of the City Council shall be final in the consideration of the proposed plat. I I I Ie 10. Upon approval and adoption of the final plat the documents will be returned to the Planning and Zoning Coordinator for processing. The Plann"íng and Zoning Coordinator shall secure the necessary signatures from the Mayor and City Secretary, and the Planning and Zoning Commission Chairman and Commission Secretary. The Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall also verify that all required contracts, covenants and City-Developer Agreements have been executed by 'the applicant with the exception of construction contracts. Upon verification of these matters the Planning and Zoning Coordinator shall submit the plat to Tarrant County Plat Records Office for filing. Upon receipt of the official filed copy of the plat from the Tarrant County Records, the Planning and Zoning Coordinator will place the official f:i1ed copy in the City Plat File and distribute the necessary copies of the plat. The original of the plat with the filing data noted will be returned to the Developer's Engineer or Surveyor. I I I 11. The approval and adoption of the Final Plat shall be valid only if the processing is completed and the plat is filed of record within one hundred eighty (180) days of the date of the City Counc:il approval. If delay is caused by Subdivider, then the subdivider must obtain an extension of time from the Planning and Zoning Commission if he wishes the plat to be filed and such extension may be either granted or denied by the Commission, at their option. I I I I Ie I 12. Approval of the Final Plat by the City Counc:il authorizes the Developer to proceed with the installation of the public facilities in the subdivision as approved in the engineering plans. I SE C TIO N 1-04 Ie I REPLATS A Replat is required any time it is proposed to subdivide an existing platted lot or tract into smaller lots or any time it is proposed to com bine existing smaller lots or tracts into a larger tract. I I A. 0 WNER SHIP A proposed Replat must be formatted to include all of the property within the existing lot or lots which are currently filed of record. No Replat may be approved which does not contain the signatures of all the affected property owners. I B. PROCEDURES I 1. The procedures to be followed for replatting preparation are the same as those for the preparation of Final Plats. Replats will. be reviewed for completeness by the ,Economic Development Department and for Engineering Requirements by the Public Works Department. 2. Any replat involving an existing residential subdivision limited to one or two family residences or any lots which were, in the past five years, limited to one or two family residences by zoning or deed restrictions shall be subject to following conditions in addition to the other provisions of this section. I I A. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the proposed replat to allow parties with an interest to be heard. -- I B. Notice of the public hearing before the Commission shall be given in the following manner: I (1) At least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of the Commission meeting official notice of the public hearing shall. be published in the City's official newspaper. (2) Written notice of the public hearing shall be mailed to all property owners ,within the existing plat. Should the existing plat contain more than, one hundred (100) lots, the required notice will. be sent to the owners of all lots in the Subdivision within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed replat. Such notices shall be mailed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the scheduled meeting. I I I I I Ie I C. If the owners of twenty (20%) percent, or more, of the lots to whom notice is made, file with the Planning and Zoning Com mission a written protest of the proposed replatting, prior to or at the pu blic hearing, then approval of the plat may proceed only if the subdivider secures written consent of the owners of at least sixty six and two-thirds (66 2/3%) percent of the lots to whom notice was made. D. Proposed replats which are submitted solely for purpose of meeting one I Ie I or more of the following criteria may be exempted from the public hearing process of Section 2 above. (1) To correct an error in any course or distance shown on the prior plat. (2) To add any course or distance that was omitted on the prior plat. I (3) To correct an error in the description of the real property shown on the plat. I (4) To indicate monu ments set after death, disability, or retirement from practice of the surveyor charged with responsibilities for setting monuments. I (5) To show the proper location or character of any monument which has been changed in location or character Or which originally was shown at the wrong location or incorrectly ~s to its character on the prior plat. I I (6) To correct any other type of scrivener or clerical error or omission as previously approved by the City Council; such errors and omissions may include, but are not limited to, lot numbers, acreage, street names, and identification of adjacent recorded plats. I Ie (7) To correct an error in courses and distances of lot lines between two adjacent lots where both lot owners join in the application for plat amendment and neither lot is abolished, provided that such amend ment does not attempt· to remove recor'ded covenants or restrictions and does not have a materially adverse effect on the property rights of the other owners in the plat. I I (8) To relocate a lot line in order to cure an inadvertent encroachment of a building or improvement on a lot line or ea·sement. I 3. Replats will be considered by the Plannin,g and Z'oning Commission upon completion of the comments from the Staff and City Engineer. The Planning and Zoning Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council as to the disposition of the proposed replat. I 4. The City Council w:ill. consider a proposed replat upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. No replat shall be considered by the City Council on which the required fees and assessments have not been paid or on which the necessary covenants and contracts have not been executed by the developer. I I 5. Filing of approved Replats shall be processed by the Planning and Zoning Coordinator in exactly the same manner as Final Plats. I Ie I I S E C T ION 1-05 Ie I SHORT FORM PLATS A Short Form Plat request may be submitted on a property if the following conditions are met. I 1. There must be an existing building on the lot capable of being occupied as a legal residence or business. I 2. The lot must not have any apparent drainage problems or contribute to or cause a drainage problem on another tract. The City Engineer will review the Master Drainage Plan of the City in relation to the proposed lot to determine whether a drainage study may be required by the applicant's engineer in order to satisfy this provision. I 3. The subject tract must be less than five (5) acres in size. I 4. The lot must front on a paved dedicated street and additional right of way shall be dedicated if needed. I 5. All utDities required to serve the lot are in place or arrangements to provide same have been made with appropriate easements being shown on the plat. I 'When all of the foregoing conditions have been met the applicant may submit a Short Form Plat for Final Plat consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. Ie Processing of the Plat Application will follow the same procedures as those of a Final Plat. I I I I I I I Ie I I SE C TIO N 1-06 Ie I I I I I I CITY-DEVELOPER AGREEMENTS In the event that the Developer of a proposed subdivision requests participation by the City in the construction of the public facilities and that participation is approved by the City Council and the total participation costs by the City exceed $5000, then the Developer must execute a City-Developer Agreement. (See attached forms). All City-Developer Agreements must be executed by the Developer and approved by the City prior to the processing of the Final Plat for filing of rrecord. CITY- DEVELOPER AGREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS § THE COUNTY OF § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: I -- I I I I I I II Ie I That (Individ uals Name) - an individual doing business as _(Company Name) (or) a Corporation organized under the laws of ( State) (or) a Partnership consisting of (N ames) of the County of (County) State of (S tate) , hereinafter called Developer, and the City of Nqrth Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called City., enter into the following contract: In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and for the purpose of providing (Improvements) as indicated in the construction documents titled (Plan Title) (Plat Title) to serve an Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, the Developer and the City hereto agree: I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I 1. The Developer agrees to pay the City all inspection and processing fees and furnish all permits, easements, and right-of-way as required for the construction of the above referenced fac~es. In addfiion, at no cost to the City, the Developer agrees to have complete construction plans, specifications and all other necessary contract docu ments prepared by a registered professional engineer and also furnish construction surveying, cut sheets and fÚÙd adjustments. 2. The Developer agrees to post with the City a cash deposit to be placed in escrow or an "Irrevocable Commercial Letter of Credit" in the amount equal to the total construction costs. Such letter of credit shall be in compliance with the requirements of the City's Ordinances. The Developer will enter into a contract with the Contractor who will perform the work and who will be paid by the Developer as specified in the construction contract documents. Monthly pay estimates shall be subject to City review. 3. The Developer agrees to provide at no cost to the City, all testing necessary to insure that the construction is in aecordance with the specifications and city standards. 4. The Developer understands and agrees that he has no authority to cancel, alter or amend the terms of the construction contract without specific written authority of the City and that he shall be responsible for paying the costs of any cancellations, additions, alterations, or amendments to the Contract unless specifically provided otherwise by written authorization from the City. 5. The Developer agrees to require the selected contractor to provide to the City on City forms, maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty (20%) percent of the contract price. The bond shall be submitted prior to commencing with construction' and shall be good for two years commencing with the approved completion of the facilities. 6. The City agrees to participate in the cost of the facilities after construction is complete and accepted. The description and amount of participation is as follow s: 7. The City will provide the inspections as required and upon satisfactory completion of the work, the City will accept ownership and operation of the system su bject to the terms of the maintenance bonds. 8. The DEVELOPER further covenants and agrees to, and by these presents does hereby, fully idemnify J hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents J and employees from all suits, actions or claims of any character, whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages sustained by any persons (including death) or to any property, resulting from or in connection with the construction, design, performance or completion of any work to be performed by said DEVELOPER, his contractors, subcontractors, officers, agents or I Ie I employees, or in consequence of any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intent:i.onal or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of said DEVELOPER, his contractors, sub-contractors, officers, agents or employees, whether or not such :injuries, death or damages are caused, in whole or in part, by the alleged negligence of the City of North Richland Hills, its officers, agents, servants, employees, contractors or subcontractors. I 9. Upon completion of the work good and sufficient title to all facilities constructed warranted free of any liens or encumbrances is hereby vested in the City of North Richland Hills. (j I 10. Special provisions: I I I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to these presents have executed this Contract in five (5) counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original on this the day of , 19 I DEVELOPER (SEAL) . BY I CITY I ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY BY I I I I I Ie I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and (j acknowledges to me that he executed the same for the purposes and considerations therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFF~ICE THIS , 19 day of Notary Public in and for County, Texas My Com mission expires , 19 I SE C TIO N 1-07 Ie I I CON T R A C TIN G CON S T R U C TIO N A. PROCEDURE I I On projects not requ1n.ng City Developer Agreement the Final Plat Approval authorizes the Developer to proceed with construction of the water, sewer, street drainage and traffic facilities required by the Engineering Plans. All. construction shall. be in accordance with the applicable Sections of this Ordinance. The Developer may choose his own contractor subject to the contractor executing the necessary bonds with the City and payment of the Inspection fees required for each portion of the public fac:ili.t:ies. B. CIT Y PAR TICIP A TIO N I In developments where, by reason of City policy, the City Council deems it advisable to participate in the community facili.ties being constructed to the extent of five thousqnd ($5,000) dollars or more, the contract for such construction shall. always be advertised for bids in accordance with the City's Charter and shall. require the execution of a City-Developer Agreement as noted above. The Developer shall. deposit with the City the funds or acceptable security as required by the applicable City Ordinances, required to pay his portion of the construction costs prior to the construction. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer's Engineer to prepare all contract documents for the use of the City and the contractor as well as all copies of the Engineering Plans for the bidding and construction of the project. I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I I SECTION 1-08 Ie I STREET AND EASEMENT VACATIONS A. PROCEDURE I When a citizen, group of citizens or developer wishes to propose the closing or vacation of a specific public right of way, street or easement, which is currently in use, the following procedures must be fonowed: I 1. A petition requesting the proposed closing or vacation must be presented to the Economic Development Department together with the appropriate filing fee. Such petition must contain the signatures of all property owners holding property adjacent to the portion of the street or easement which is proposed to be vacated. In addition, a Standard Form of Vacation Acknowledgement shall be completed and submitted for each ut:lli.ty currently located within the right of way or easement. I I 2. The Planning and Zoning Coordinator will set a public hearing of the proposed closing, before the Planning and Zoning Commission at a regularly scheduled C om mission meeting. I a. Public Notices will be mailed to all property owners affected by the proposed closing or vacation at least fifteen (15) days prior to the sched u1ed meeting. I '3. The Commission will conduct a public hearing allowing opportunity for interested parties to express their opinions of the proposed closing or vacation. At the close of the public hearing the Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council as to the advisability of approving the proposed closing or vacation. . . I 4. The proposed closing or vacation will then be set for public hearing before the City Council by the following notices. I a. The hearing will be noticed by the publishing of a legal notice in the official City Newspaper at least thirty (30) days priDr to the schedule hearing. b. Adjacent property owners ~ill. be not:lf:fßd by mill of the proposed public hearing at least th:irty (30) days prior to the scheduled hearing. I I I c. Notice of the proposed hearing before the City Council will. be posted in three (3) public places within the City at least thirty (30) days prior to the scheduled hearing. I I Ie I 5. The City Council will conduct the public hearing on the proposed closing or vacation allowing opportunity for all interested parties to express their opinions on the matter. At the close of the public hearing the City Council w:fll. make a determination whether the evidence presented at the hearing and the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning provide sufficient justification for proceeding with the closure or vacation. I 6. Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I If the City Council determines that the vacation or closure should proceed J the City Staff will. be instructed to perform the following: a. Secure an appraisal of the value of the physical property involved in the closure. b. Advertise and accept bids for the sale of the vacated right of way or easement. c. Prepare and submit to the City Council for execution documents for sale of the property involved in the vacation or closure. I I Department: Public to.'brks aUbject: Approval of the Public Works/Utility Design I Manual - Resolutl0n No. 88-40 'I :1 ;1 ;1 !I 11 I_ I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date:ll/14/88 Agenda Number: GN 88-106 The Planning & Zoning Carrnission and staff are proposing the Ci ty Council approve and adopt the Public Works/Utility Design Manual by resolution instead of ordinance for more flexibility with respect to revisions. Minor revisions to details concerning type of materials or additional material thickness can be modified and brought to Council as a resolution instead of a lengthy ordinartÒe process. Reccmœndation: The Planning & Zoning Ccmnission and staff recœrænd approval of Resolution No. 88-40. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Othe . Acct. Number N/A Sufficient Funds Available uP ¡¿f/t /~ City Manager I Finance Director "I ..- ..~....---_..~--~._-~.-..~~--- ..- c " "'r '/ /-. r"' ~ ¡ ,...., ..,,..-. -rlllt ~ ~., '""-' -:-:- ~ '* - .._._.._,.r-....... .........__._,........ ',_ "__', '. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I RESOLt1rION NO. 88-40 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF· NORI'H RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland and its staff desire to establish mdn~ design criteria for all public works/utilities llnprovement~ proposed to be installed; and, WHEREAS, the Ci ty Council has passed a new Sulxli vision Ordinance which references a "Design Manual" for said Public rbrks/Utilities llnprovenents . NCM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the attached City of North Richland Hills Public Works/Utility "Design Manual" shall be approved by passage of this Resolution and this Resolution shall take effect from and after its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this 14th day of November, 1988. Mayor ATI'EST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Atto:rney for the City I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I CITY OF NORTH nICHLAND HILLS DES I GI'J MA~JUf~L F'URF10SE The following document contains the various construction c~iteria, techniques, and details which are the minimum requirements of the City of North Richland Hills for the required public facilities. These data are primarily intended for the use of the Developsr and his Engineer to enable the applicant to provide the proper design for the public facilities associated with the proposed development. These criteria are not intended as an exhaustive list of the construction techniques available. In the event that specific circumstances dictate additional requirements, it shall be the the 'responsibility of the Developer~s Engineer to provide the necessary details for construction to be approved by the Public Works Depart~ent and/or City Engineer. These design criteria and details shall be considered as an auxiliary document and may be modified by administrative action of the City and subsequent Resolution by the City Council at such times as may be appropriate in keeping with the most up-to-date construction techniques and specifications. All water, sewer, streets and drainage installations shall be in accordance with the current City Standards and Specifications. SECTION 2-01 A. CONSTRUCTION pt AN REQUIREMENTS All construction plans for propos~d public water, sanitary sewer, streets, dralnage ,and traffic improvements shall adhere to the following requirements: 1. Plans are to be designed, signed and sealed, and dated by a professional Civil Engineer registered in the State of Texas and furnished in the following format: a. Cover Sheet Containing: - prDject title - legal property description - city name - vie i nit y ¡-nap - Owner, Engineer and Surveyor~s name, address and tel ephOt1e nun:ber project title in small print placed vertical along the right border - sheet i i1de~{ - signature block b. Copy of current plat bound with plans c. Drainage Area Map and calculations d . Gr ad i n Ç1 PI? ~ ,.:.. +- h .,.. ~?:-~ i r:: t ~. ~ M -, - -' _.... __-- ,.. .- ~ ~ __. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I contours, storm drains and/or other drainage facilities e. Site Plan indicating the location and ~~Jidtt1 of all proposed and existing street and driveway approach bacl~-of-C:Llrb lines ë\i1d radi i f. Utility Plan indicating th~ location and size of all e~·:isting ~aJater and sanitary se~~er liries. Also shew the location of all existing and propsed fire hydrants adjacent to the site including the maximum coverage radii as outlined in other sections of this manual g. Plan and Profilæ sheets for roads, sewers, storm drains, water lines 12 inch and larger, and channels. Stationing shall be left to right and with stationing beginning at the downstream end for all pipes and channels h. Details for improvements which are to become pLiblic: 2. Plan and profile sheets shall be a maximum of twenty-foLlr (2411) inches wide by thirty si~·~ (3611) inc:hes long. 3. Horizontal scale shall be one (1) inch equals forty (40) feet or larger. Vertical scale shall be one (1) inch equals four (4) feet. 4. Appropriate hydraulic grade line or water surface profile shall be plotted with all drainage design. Capacity, design discharge, friction slope, velocity, and velocity head shall be noted on each segment of drainage facility whenever one -or more of these parameters changes. B. OTHER UTILITIES 1. The developer shall furnish all easements and ROW necessary for construction o~ electrical, gas, cable TV, and telephone service ~o ~he proposed subdivision. SECTION 2-02 WATER SYSTEM A.WATER SYSTEM EXTENSIONS 1. Water systems shall have a sufficient number of outlets and shall be of sufficient size to furnish adequate domestic service, to provide adequate fire protection to all lots, and to conform to the City's current Master Water Distribution System Plan. 2. All tee intersections of public include at least tWD (2) gate i ntet-sec:t ions of plJbl i c ~·JatQr mai ns least three (3) gate valves. water mains shall valves. All cross shall include at I Ie I I I I I I I lie I I I I I I I Ie I 3. The minimum size water main in conventional single family resicjential at-eas shall be si~< (6") ir.c:hes in diameter, except in cul-de-sacs which are less than four hundred (400) feet in length and do not require a fire hydrant installation. Cul-de-sacs meeting these criteria may be served by a fOLn- (4") inch diameter main. 4. The minimum size water main in all other other areas shall be eight (811) inches in diameter. Larger diameter mains be necessary if fire flow requirements so dict3te. A fire flow analysis may be required by the Director of Public Works if deemed ~ecessary to determine adequate proposed water main sizes. 5. Minimum depth of cover over all water mains smaller than ten (1()1I) i nches in di ametsr shall - be three (3:1 ) feet. ~1i ni mLlm depth of cover for water mai ns ten (10") inches and larger shall be three and one-half (3.5~) feet. 6. Where water mains are to be installed in Rights-of-Way having roads constructed without curb and gutter, a plan and profile sheet shall be submitted with the construction plans showing the existing street grades~ preliminary future top-of-curb grades, and the proposed water main profile. 7. Residential water services shall not be directly connected to water mai ns si ~~ teen (1611) inches in diameter or greater. Parallel water mains to provide distribution and service are required in these cases. 8. All water services shall bè placed at the between lots, where possible, unless approved by the Director of Public Works. lot line, ott1erwi se B. FIRE HYDF=: f~NTS 1. In all conven~ion~l single-family subdivision districts, fire hydrant spacing shall be every six hundred (600~) feet along a water main and shall not allow the fire hose lay distance to any point on the building to exceed eight hundred (800~) feet as measured along public ROWand/or emergency access easements. All lots within the proposed subdivision shall be within five hundred (500') feet radial distance of a fire hydrant. 2.In all other subdivision districts, fire hydrant spacing shall be every three hundred (300~) along a water mi.~i f1 and shall not allow the fire hose 1 ay dist3nc~ to any point on the building to exceed five hundred (500~) feet as measured along public ROWand/or emergency access easements. The entire subdivision shall be within thr~e hundred (300~) feet ,radial di5tanc~ of a fire hydrant. ~ ~. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 3. Fire hydrants located on the opposite side of a thorOL\ghf are, (i . e. , pavement wi dth greater than forty-one (41~) feet), from a development shall not be considered when determining adequate fire hydrant coverage for a development. c. REQUIRED WATFR MAIN EXTENSIONS All water mains constructed within a proposed subdivision shall be extended to the perimeter of the proposed SLlbdi vi si on to allow fDr fL\tL\re e}: tensi on of the ~~ater sys·tem into adjacent pt-opE-rties. (J D . MATER I t~l_S Ar"D t\jOR'<MA~~SH! F' All materials and wOt-kmanship inc:ot-porated- in vJater sy"stem extensions shall be in accordance with the currently adopted City Construction Specifications. SECTION 2-03 SE~JERAGE SYSTEM A. SEWERAGE SYSTEM EXT~NSIONS All Subdivisions developed subsequent to this Ordinance must be served by community sanitary sewer collection, treatment and disposal systems approved by the City. Each lot must be provided with an individual servicE. E~{ceptiDns may be granted to this requirement only if all of the follwing conditions are met: 1. The proposed subdivision consists of three (3) lots or 1 esse 2. The existing City s~wer, system is not and cannot feasibly, in the opinion of the Public Works Department, be Inade available to the area of development. 3. Percolation tests run by an independent testing laboratory are submitted to both the City and the County Health Department with results showing that a septic tank and absorption field can be developed to provide adequate disposal of the sewage. Where septic tank installations are permitted in lieu of a sanitary sewerage system, the plat must include dedicated alleys not less than 20 feet in width adjacent to all lots to facilitate the future installation Df a sewerage system. Dedication of such alleys shall prohibit fencing or other obstructions that would interfere with the future installation of the sewers. B. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN CRITERIA 1. Sanitary sewer facilities shall be provided to adequately service each lot or tract of the subdivision, 4. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I and shall conform to the City~s current Master Sanitary Sewer System Plan. 2. No sanitary sewer main shall be less than six (6") inches in diameter. All sewers shall be designed wih consideration for serving the full drainage area subject to collection by the sewer in question. Exceptions to this requirement may be made only at the direction of the Director of Public Works. 3. All services shall be placed at lot unless instructe~ otherwise PLtbl i c Works. tile by center of each the Director of 4. Vertical curves in the sanitary sewer mains will not be all otfJed. 5. Manhole spacing shall not exceed five hundred (500~) feet. 6. All sanitary sewer mains shall end at a manhole. Cleanouts will not be allowed. c. LATERALS AND MAINS All laterals and sewer mains installed within a subdivision must extend to the borders of the subdivision as required for future extensions of the collection system regardless of whether or not such extensions are required for service within the subdivision. D. LIFT STATIONS OR SEPARATE TREATMENT FACILITIES The provisions for lift stations or separate treatment facilities will not be permitted unless , in the opinion of the Director of Public Works and ths City Engineer, there is no feasible alternative in order to provide the necessary servi ce to the propos~d SLlbdi vi,si on. E. CO!\I!\IECT I O~'JS No connection shall be made to any sanitary sewerage system within the City which will permit the entrance of surface water or waste of other than domestic sewage characteristics without the specific authorization of the City Council. SECTION 2-04 STREETS A. STREETS REQUIR~D All streets constructed within the City shall be required to be constructed with curbs and gutters. The required widths of all streets within the City shall be determined by the IIFL\nct i anal Cl assi f i cat i on II of the streets as ccntai ned i r. the most current revision of the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of North Richland Hills. 5. I· Ie I I I I I I :1 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I B. STREET DESIGN CRITERIA 1. All streets within or abutting the proposed subdivision shall be paved, with curbs and guttsrs installed, in accordance with the City~s Standard5 and Specifications. All paving shall be to the width specified on the Master Thoroughfare Plan and shall be constructed under the supervision of the Public Wor!<s Department. The construction costs of all street improvements shall be borne by the Developer unless participation by the City has been approved. a 2. Underground utilities required in the subdivision shall be placed under or across all streets after the rough grades are made, but prior to the paving being placed. Paving operations will not be allowed to start until all utility work is completed and accepted by the City. 3. Street grades shall be such that excessive sand deposition from too low a water velocity or pavement scouring from too high a velocity is to be avoided as far as possible. The minimum street grade permitted shall be 0.50%. The maximum street grade shall not exceed 8.0%. Any deviation from this range of permissible grades shall require the approval of the Director of Public Works. 4. Standard roadway widths from face of curb to face of curb are thirty (30~) feet in a fifty (50') foot ROW, forty (40~) feet in a sixty (60~) foot ROW, forty-eight (48~) feet in a si~ty-eight (68~) foct ROW, sixty (60~) feet in an eighty (80') foot 'ROW, two (2) twenty-four (24~) feot pavement sections with an eighteen (18~) foot median in a ninety (90~) foot ROW, and two (2) thirty-si}~ (36~) foot pavement sections with an eighteen (18') foot median in a one hµndred ten (110') foot ROW. 5. The minimum classifi.ed,width of a proposed 'street may be enlarg~d under the fOllowing conditions: a. Adjacent to commercial or multi-family land uses where, in the opinion of the Planning and Development Department or the Public Works Department, additional width is indicated for proper access and circulation. b. Where, in the opinion of the City or in the opinion of the Developer with the concurrence of the City, the esthetic value achieved from extra width is dictated by special conditions. 6. No street shall be more than one thousand (1000') feet in length without an intersection. with another street which will provide some degree of flaxibility in traffic patterns and public convenience. 6. I· Ie I 7. No street may be designed to be dead-2nded without the installation of a cul-de-sac with a forty (40~) foat radius to the face of curb in a fifty (50~) foot radius right-of-way. No cul-de-sac street may exceed five hundred (500~) feet in length. I I I I I 8. Standard reinforced concrete curb height and width is si ~.~ (6 If ) 1 ¡ìches ~~i th a t~4Jen t ,,'-f OLlr (24 ") i r-¡c:i1 i ntegr al gutter section~ measured from the face of the curb. Any deviation from this section will require the approval of the Director of Public Works. (j 9. The minimum pavement and subgrade thickness for the various street widths shall be as indicated in the standard details. 10. Minimum horizontal curvature radii for design of street centerlines shall be as follows: Arterial Collector Residential 8C)() feet 400 feet 2C)() feet I Ie 11. In order to maintain an adequate sight distance, the mi ni mLlm U~<II V\31 Lies for the compLLtati on of verti cal curves in the formula L=KA~ where L is the length of the vertical curve in feet, and A is the algebraic difference of the street grades in percent (%) are listed below: I I Desiqn Saeed MF'H 3() 4() 5C) Crest Vertical Curve II .=:: .. Val Ll e ' 28 Sac Vortical Curve . n ~< II ~/ a 1 Ll e 35 60 110 60 9C) 12. The minimum radius fer curb returns at intersections shall be twenty (20~) feet t~ the face of the curb~ I I I I I Ie I . . 13. A °tangen-t of at 1 east one hL¡ndred (1(}()~) shall be introduced between reverse curves on and colI ectot- streets. feet long ar t 2r i ~1.1 14. At all street intQrsections there shall be provided a minimum ten (10') feet by ten \10~) foot corner clip sid2walk ~nd utility easement diagonal tD the strset ROW 1 i Iles. 15. Rei nf arced conr:ret~ val18·Y gLlt t2rs sh¿,ll be r2q~..ti red at all asphal t. street i ntet-secti ons wherl~ gL\t ter flowlines cross another strset or at low points where water flow crosses the street. 16.Median openings shall be spaced a minimum of 600 feet center-to-center or 500 feet curb-to-curb, whichever is greater. 7. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I C. S I DEvJAL~:"~S 1. Sidewalks and appropriats curb ramps shall be installed on all streets classified as Collector Street or larger. 2. Side\ltJalks st1all be constrLtc:t2d of fOLlY'" (411) inch thick three thousand (3,000) psi compressive strength concrete reinforced with #3 steel bars laid on eighteen (lSH) inch cen'ters tt-anversely and fOLirteen (1411) inch centers longitudinally. (J 3. Sidewalks shall be a minimum of four (4~) feet in wi dth. The si dewal k shall be located on tt1e Ci t y par kttJay adjac8nt to the private property line. Sidewalks shall be gr aded sLu::h that the si dewal k at the- propet-t y 1 i ne shall be no greater than two and one-half (2-1/211) inches higher than the top of curb. 4. Under spec:if.ic circumstances the Director of F'Ltblic: Works may approve deviations from these criteria to satisfy individual site requirements. D. CITY PARTICIPATION Where a street is designated as a Collector or Arterial street on the City of North Richland Hills Thoroughfare Plan, the City will participate in the construction costs of that thoroughfare in conventional single family residential areas only. The City's participation is limited to streets wider : than thirty-six (36') feet. In these designated streets, the CitY,will pay all of the paving costs ~or the additional street width above the thirty-si~ (36~) feet when it is determined that the need for the additional street capacity is not directly attributable to the traffic pattern of the proposed development. The determination of these needs shall be made by the Planning and De~elopment Department and the Publ i c Works Department. The Developer shall pay for ths thirty-six (36') feet of pavement including any extra depth of pavement, curb and gutter for both sides, all excavation required, and all other costs involved 'in the street constrLtcti on. When a street is required to be ccnst~ucted with extra width or special conditions by the City for esthetic value or special circumstances, the City will participate on the same basis as in thoroughfare considerations. Where the Qversizing of the street is at the discretion of the Dev~loper for esthetic purposes or speciÐl consderations, no participation is reqLli t-ed. In all areas other than conventional single family residential areas when existing development would require additional strength design or additional width. of pavement to accommodate expected traffic use, no City participation is allowed. 8. I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I E. DRIVEWAY STANDARDS 1. Residential Driv2wav Approaches a. Residential driveway approaches shall be constrLtcted of five (511) i nc:h thi c:k three thoLlsand (3,000) psi compressive strength concrete reinforced with #3 steel bars on eighteen (1811) inch centers each way. The driveway shall begin at the street curb and extend to the property line or to a point ten (10~) feet from the face of the curb, whichever is greater. The drive approach shall be constructed such that the height of the drive approach at the property line with a nominal ten (10~) parkway shall be two and one-half (2-1/2") i nc:hes hi gher than the top- of the C:Llrb. b. Width of Driveway Approaches: Residential driveway approaches shall not be less than twelve (12') fee-t, in \.ii dth nor more than twenty (20=-) feet wide measured at the property line. c. Radius: Residential driveways shall be constructed with the return curbs having a relIed face disappearing at the sidewalk and joining the street curb with a minimum five (5') foot radius and a maximum ten (10') foot radius. d. Provision for Joint Approaches: Driveway approaches shall be 'located entirely within the frontage of the premisès they serve except that joint, or cooperative, drivev~ays ~·Jith adjoiriing property holders may be permitted and may be required by the Director of Public Works. When the joint drive approach is propDsed by the developer, the request must be made by all the interestQd parties and all property owners involved. The design of -the joint driveway facilities must be submitted with the request to be approved by the Director of Public Works. 2.Commercial Drivewav Approaches a. Commercial and Industrial driveway approaches shall be const¡r-Ltcted of si >~ (6") inch thi ck thrc:..\e thousand (3,000) psi compressive strength concrete rei nf arced ¡,~i th #4 steel bars on ei ghteen (1811) inch centers each way. The driveway shall begin at the curb of the street and extend to the property line or to a point ten (10) feet from the face of the curb, whichever is greater. The drive approach shall be constructed such that the height of the drive approach at the property line shall be two and one-half (2-1/211) inct1es higher than the top of curb at tt1e street. b. Width of Driveway Approach: The width of any commercial or industrial driveway approach shall 9. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I not be less than twenty (20') feet nor more than thirty-five (35') feet measured along the property line. Specific variances to this crit2ria may be requested by the developer. Any variance granted based upon a specific design submittal must have the approval of the Director of Public Works. c. Radius: Commercial and Industrial driveways shall be constructed with the return curbs having a rolled face disappearing at the sidewalk and joining the street curb with a minimum ten (10~) foot radius and a maximum thirty (30') foot radius. d. Allowable Spacing for Driveway Approaches: On streets classified as Collector Streets, the minimum centerline spacing between driveways shall be at least three hundred (300') feet. On streets classified as Arterials, minimum spacing shall be at least five hundred (500~) feet. This spacing criteria ~hall be applied irrespective of the number of individual properties located within the intervening distance. Specific variances to this criteria may be requested by the Developer. Any variance granted will be based on a specific design submittal and must have the approval of the Director of Public Works. e. Provision for Joint Approaches: Driveway approachss shall be located entirely within the frontage of the premises and shall be located not less than ten (10') 'feet ,from each side pt-opet-ty line except that joint, or cooperative, drive approaches with adjoining property holders may be permitted in order to conform with the provisions of paragraph (d) above. Any request for joint drive acc&ss must be by agreement of all parties involved and a specific plan submittal must be included for the approval of the Director of Public Works. Both properties will be ,r~quired to dedicate public ingress and egress easements to cover the I approach and joint access area. f. Angle of Driveway driveway approach with ninety (90) degrees. Approach: The angle of the the curb line shall be g. Sidewalk to be Removed: Where a driveway approach is to be built, the sidewalk shall be removed and the 8ntire area replac2d as a driveway. The drive approach shall Extend to the property line. 3. General a. Residential Driveway Approaches at street Intersections: The driveway must be located with one side five (5~) feet from the side property line fartherest from the intersection. 1 (). I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I b. Approaches on Properties other than Residential: The driveway for tt,e corrler lot, if allo~'Jed, ffiL\st be located a minimum of one hundred (100') feet from the point of of the intersection the curb lines of both streets. c. Driveway Approaches At Pedestrian Crossings: Driveway approaches shall not be located in street intersections or at established pedestrian crossings. d. Driveway Approaches at Obstructions: Driveways shall be kept at a minimum of five (5') feet away from obstructions such as street light posts, fire hydrants, traffic signal standards, etc. e. Driveway Approach not to be Obstructed: Driveway approaches shall not be constructed or designed for parking of vehicles or for use as angle parking. f. Driveway approaches shall not occupy more than forty (40%) percent of the frontage of a lot Dr tt-act. SECTION 2-05 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS A. GEt~ERAL Ths criteria herein provided shall govern ·the design of storm drainage improvements within the City of NRH. Improvements shall include streets, alleys, storm sewers, channels, culverts~ bridges, swales, and any other facility through which storm water flows. All drainage improvements shall be constructed in accordance with Ci,ty specifications and be in dedicated ROW, drainage ·easement or floodway easement. The developer shall provide all the necessary easement and ROW required for drainage structures, 'including storm se~ers and open channels with access ramps. Easement 'width for storm sewer pipe shall be not less than fifteen (15~) feet, and easement width for open channels shall be at least forty (40~) feet wider than the top of the channel, twenty (20~) feet of which shall be on each side to serve as ac~ess ways for maintenance purposes. The developer shall be rC?qLli red to install at hi 5 Oli'Jn e}~ pense all storm sewers and drainage structures. This policy is applicable to all drainage faciliti~s including the main channels and tributaries of Mackey, Calloway, Walker, Little Bear and Mesquite Branch Creeks, but excepting Big Fossil Creek. The developer shall be responsible for excavation and full concrete channel liner improvements based. on the fully urbanized one hundred (100) year frequency discharge for the channel, unless otherwise approved by the City Council. 11 . I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I B. BASIS OF DESIGN 1. Rational Method: The method of calculation for storm runoff for drainage areas less than seven hundred fifty (750) acres will be the Rational Method. The method is expressed by the following equation: Q=CIA Q = storm discharge at the design point in CLlb i c: feet per second. C = rLtnoff coefficient representing the ratio of peak runoff to the rainfall. I = Average rainfall intensity for the t i £:1 e of concentration at the design point in i nchE'5 per hour. A = area contribLlting rLtnof f to the point of design in acres. 2.Unit HvdroqraDh Method: Peak discharges for drainage areas exceeding seven hundred fifty (750) acres shall be determined by using the unit hydrograph method. The unit hydrcgrapgh for this method shall be developed by using the criteria as outlined in IIFlood-Hydrograph Analysis and Computation II, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers~ Engineering and Design Manuals~ EM 110-2-1405~ Washington D.C. dated August 31~ 1959. A unit period of fifteen (15) minutes should be used for the determination the unit hydrograph. In lieu of this procedut~, there are several public domain micro-computer programs available which will provide satisfactory results. If the Developer elects to use a computer program, he should obtain prior approval ft-om F'ubl i c Works. 3.Runoff Coefficient: Storm ,drainage improvements shall be designed based on the drainage areas being fully developed. The zoning as shown on the current City Zoning maps or the City~s Master Land Use Plan , whichever is more restrictive, shall' determine the particular coefficient value selected. Table IV-l indicates the runoff coefficients for the different land Ltses. TABLE V-1 RUt·JOFF COr=FF I C I E!'JT II e" Single Family Zoning Districts Duplex Zoning Districts Townhome and Garden Home Districts MUlti-family District, Commercial Districts Industrial Districts School, Church and Institutional Districts Parks and Agricultural District () . 55 0.60 0.65 ().75 C). 9 () 0.85 0.65 0.30 12. I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 4.Time of Concentration: The time of concentration shall be defined as the ·tiJTle reqLlired for a drop of '-"Jater to flow from the upper limits of a drainage ãrea to the point of concentration. Times of con~entration shall be calculated for all inlets, pipe junctions, and other critical design points in the proposed storm sewer systems. The following minimum inlet times of concentration may be used in placs of calculated times. When calculating inlet times, consider overland flow channelized at such time as the distance traveled exceeds one hundred (100~) feet. TABLE V -2 Minimum Inlet Time of Concentration Tvee of Area Business and Commercial IndLlstri al MLlI ti -fami 1 y Residential Parks and Open Space Minimum Inlet Time lC) 11i rlutes 10 Minutes 10 t1inLites 15 Minutes 2CJ Mi nutes 5.Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Freauency: The rainfall intensity-duration-frequency information compiled in Technical Paper No. 40 by the U.S. Weather Bureau, D~partment of COfTlmerCe shall. be utilized in computing rainfall intensity. 6.Desicn Storm FreQuency: Storm frequency to be used in design shall be as shown in the followin'g table: TABLE V -3 Desion storm Fr~auency Type of Fdcilitv Minimum Desicn Frequency Storm Sewers 5 Years Streets 5 Years CL11·\/erts, Bri dges, Channel s:, Underpasses, and Creeks. 1 ()() Years A storm sewer shall be designed to pick up flow from the stræet when the runoff from a five (5) year frequency storm e~':ceeds the capaci t"i of the street to its top of curb. the spread of water on a collector street does not leave one (1) traffic lane dry, or the spr~ad of water on an arterial str2et does not leave two (2) traffic lanes dry~ whichever is the mora restrictive. The combi ned c:apaci ty of the s~treet and ROl.J and/o;'" drai 11age easements and the storm sewer pipe shall be adequate to safely convey the runoff from d one hundred (100) year freqLtency stOt-m. 7. Flo~~ in '3treets: street capaci ty shall. be determined by utilizing Manning's equation: Q = 1.486 AR2/3 SI/2 o n I- I _ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I Q = discharge in cubic feet per second n = Manning's roughness coeffici~nt, use 0.016 Tor pavement and gutters. A = cross-sectional area of flow in square fe~t R = hydraulic radius in feet S = street or gutter slope in feet p~r foot For parabolic crown 3treets, the cross slcpe shall be represented by the following formula: w 2 f¡- 4Cx2 y=-- w2 All discharge of runoff from street to an open channel shall be in a flume or through an inlet with adjoining pipe and headwall. 8. storm D~ain Inlets: The èapacity of a depressed curb inlet on grade will be based en the following equation: qL = 0.7 GI I H2 J t HI ) 5/2 - ( H2 ) 5/2 qL = discharge into inlet per foot 0'£ inlet opening in c.f.s./ft ~l = a + Yo HZ = a = gutter depression in feet Yo = depth of flow in approach gutter in feet Tt-~e C3p~city of lO~J poir)t or drop iil12tS will be d8termi r¡ed bast'?d un tIle bro':'''dct-estcd ~'iei r fOt-mLll a: qL = 3.0 ( HI ) 3/2 I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I Ie I 9. Storm S~~Ner Systems: Storm seWE-¡"'s :;hall be desi qned using the continuity equation and Manning's equaticn. Q = AV and Q = 1.486 n A R 2/3 Sf 1/2 Q = A = I..} = n = R = S = discharge in CLlbic -Feet per second cross-sectional flow area normal to pipe in square feet mean velocity of flow in feet per second Manning~s roughness coefficient hydraulic radius in feet fricticn slope in feet per foot The coefficient of roughness to be used in design shall be as shown below: Pi De M,3teri al n Reinforced Concrete pipe 0.012 Corrugated Metal pipe Annular, unpaved with bituminous coating 0.024 .. , ~5% paved wi th bituminous coating 0.021 .. , 100% pa'/ed wi th bituminous coating 0.013 Helical, unpaved with bituminous coating 0.014-0.26* .. , 100% paved vJi th bitLtminous coating' ().013 * To be determined by diameter and size of corrugations. Storm sewer pipes shall be designed so that the mean velocity of flow is eq4al ,to or greater than 2.5 feet per second and equal to or less than 15 feet per second. The appropriate hydraulic gr~de line shall b~ plotted for all storm drainage design. The elevation o-F the hydraulic grade line shall in no case be closer to the gutter flow line than 1.5 feet. Points of entry into the main storm èr,,:Ün sh¿\ll be pro\/ided at least Every ·five hLlndrsd (5C~C)=') feet. 10. Open Channels: When the runoff exceeds the capacity of a seven ty-hl/o (72") inch di ameter concrete pi pe or equivalent cross-sectional pipe area (i.e., 2- 51 inch diameter concrete pipe>, the discharge shall be carried in an cpen channel. Open channols shall be designed to carry the one hundred (100) year frequency storm runoff ft-om a fUlly ut-banized ~'Jatershed with one (1') foot of freeboard in a fully concrete lined ditch. a. Full Concrete Lininq: All open ditches in all subdivisions that 3re used to c~rry surface runoff I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I across more than two (2) lots shall be fully concrete lined across the entire areas of each subdivision being developed, except as otherwise determined by the City Council. Lining of drainage ditch floors is to be done with 5i>: (611) inch thick or thicker~ 3~OOO psi compressive strength concrete. tsJalls are to be lined ~4Jith five (511) inch thi ck concrete sloped no steep(?r than one (1:S) ·f Dot vertically to (1.5:S) feet horizontally. All concrete slabs are to be reinforced with a minimum of #4 steel reinforcing bars placed at eighteen (1811) inches or less on center each way, and provided ~-Jith minimusl1 t~-Jo (211) inch diameter ~-Jeep holes with approved filter media placed at intervals no greater than twenty-five (25~) foot centers. One (1') foot wide ccncret~ wings shall be provided at the top of each concrete side slope and PVC plastic sleeves formed in the wings as required for constructing fences along the top of the channel qn each side. Vertical concrete retaining wall sections shall be designed with adequate footing and reinforcing steel to support all anticipated soil and water pressure loads acting on each side of the structure. In addition~ retaining walls shall be designed to support at least a :lhigh sLlrc:hargell 1 cad L\nl ess ott-.erwi se approved by the Director of Public Works. The height of concrete channel liner shall be at least one (1~) foot ~bove the fully urbanized one hundred (100) year wàter surface profile. Such prof i 1 e shall be, d9termi n~d b'ý backwater calculations using the HEC-2 computer program or other approved modeling methods which take into account backwater effects from downstream bridges, culverts, and other obstructions. Additional lining hei ght :nay be reqLti r-ed i.n areas of SLtperct-i ti cal flow or superelevation. In cases where the ~op of channel lin~r must be constructed above natural ground le~el as required to fully contain the one hundred (100) year flow, and where construction of levees or berms are permitted, prevision shall be made for draining the local runoff which ponds behind the levees after the water surface in the channel recedes. Finished floor elevations may be established at laast 1.5 feet above the peak one hundred (lOO) year water surface which ponds behind the levees, if approved by the Director of Public Works. If 1 evees are not approv'ed b'ý the PLtbl i c: WoY-ks Department, then· compacted earthen f i 11 sr.all be placed alor.g side tt1e chanr1el ~\jitt1in the erltire flood pI ai n area as reqLli red to concrete 1 i ne tt1e channel to a height of one (1') foot above the fully urbanized one hundred (100) year water sLlrface elevation. Side slopes of the c:hann£?l bar.ks I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I 'I I I I Ie I behind the concrete channel liner shall be no steeper than five (5') foot t10rizontal to one (!') foot vertical within the drainage channel easement, or for a distance of not less than twenty (20~) feet minimum behind the top of channel. Side slopes beyond the twenty <20') foot minimum shall be no steeper than three (3') foot horizontal to one (1') foot vertical Lif}less concrete lined or covered with approved soil erosion prDtection materials. If fencing is required~ it shall be placed along the top of the ccncrete channel liner unless a sanitary sewer main or water line is located within an easement along the channel bank, in which case the fence shall be located en the easement line tD permit unrestricted Public Works access to the utility line. b. Partial Concrete Liner: If the one hundred (100) year fully channel-contained water surface is above the ,natural ground line and levees are not approved or flood plain fill is not feasible, then the concrete channel liner shall be ext~nded to the natural ground line along each side of the channel. In no case shall the concrete lined channel capacity provided be less than that required to convey the twenty-five (25) year frequency discharge. Floodway easements shall be provided along the sides of the concrete lined channel sufficient to encompass all areas beneath the water surface elevation resul'ting from a fully urbanized one hundred (100) year discharge, plus such additional width easements as may be r~quired to provide ingress and egress to allow maintenance and to protect adjacent property against erosion, caving-in of over-banks, etc.~ as determined and required by the Public Works Department. The Developer shall be responsible for furnishing campI ete c:ross-secti,ons, gradi i1g pI ans, f~EC-2 computsr runs and all ,ether documentation requested by the Public Works bepartment as re~uired to justify less than full section toncrete channel lining and to establish the Ii/nits of the one hundred (100) year overflow flood plain lines. Water surface profile calculations shall be based on backwater effects created by an exisitng bridge, culvert or other obstruction regardless of future downstream proposed improvements. c. Earthen Channels: Earthen Channels may only be constructed after specific approval of the City Council. Approval may be given only if the following stipulations are met: 1) The velocity of flow will not exceed 8 feet par second.. 2) That sufficient easements are dedica'ted to provide protection of adjacent properties Dr ~7;.r:-". ~ i ~~ ~':': I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie 3) That floodway easements are dedicated to encompass the area below the elevation of the water surface profile of a fully urbanized one hundred (100) year frequency storm, plus one foot of freeboard and any additional area necessary to provide access and maintenance, but not less than sixty (bC)=') feet ii1 ~~idth. 4) That arrangements have been made for perpetual maintænance by the adjacent property owners or h~s been dedicated and accepted far Ci t·ÿ Park pLtr,poses; and 5) That, in the judgement of the Director of Public Works, the appropriate use of the neighboring property or the health and safety of persons affected will not be substantially i n j Lt r- e d . I I I I I I I Ie I Eat-th,en Channel s, when apPt-oved, shall be constructed with a trapezoidal shape and a minimum bottom width of twelve (12') feet and sidæ slopes not steeper than three (3') feet horizontal to one (1') foot vertical ( 4 to 1 preferred). A reinforced concrete pilot channel not less than twelve (12') feet in width Dr, as determined by the Director of Public Work3, shall be constructed. The side slopes shall be smooth, free of rocks, and contain a minifoL(m of six '(611) inches of top soil, and shall be seeded with Bermuda grass. Gobi blocks, rock rubble riprap, or other such similar materials, ~hall be placed a minimum of four C4=') feet along both sides of the pilot channel to a depth of at least two (2') feet. Size and gradation of such material shall be determined based on peak discharge veloci~y requirements. The pilot channel shall be construct~d ~s approved by the Public Works Department. The easement width for earthen channels shall extend at leàst twenty (20') feet beyond the top of each channel bank. After proposed earthen side slopes are cut~ slopes shall be covered by grass according to the City's specifications. The grass shall be planted to twenty (20') feet outside the top of'banks. The water surface profile (hydraulic grade line) fer the ene hundred (100) year frequency storm shall be shown. Maximum permissible mean velocities for the one hundred (lOa) year frequency discharge shall be eight (8) feet per second in partially concrete lined channels and in fully concrete lined channels, the maximum permissible mean velocities for the one hundred (100) year frequency discahrge shall be fifteen (15) feet per second. I· Ie I I I I I I Special consideration should be given to outlet structures on channels where concrete lining meets earthen banks when velocities exceed eight (8~) feet per second. Reinforced concrete access ramps shall be provided at all intersections of the channels with public streets. Access ramps shall be a minimum of twelve (12~) feet wide with a maximum slope of sixteen (16%) percent. 11. Bridaes and Culverts: All bridges and culverts shall be designed in accordanæe with the current edition of UHydraul i c ManLlë.,lll prepared by the Te>:as Department of Highways and Public Transportation, Bridge Division. The fully urbanized one hundred (100) year frequency storm hydraLllic: grade line shall be plotted-. All culverts shall have headwalls and wingwalls upstream and downstream. All culverts shall pass the fully urbanized one hundred (100) year frequency storm ~unoff without allowing runoff, to pass over the road. All bridges shall have channel bottom and slopes concrete lined. The low point on the bridge structure shall be one (1') foot above the fully urbanized one hundred (100) year frequency storm water surface. I Ie 12. ~ot Gradino: Lot grading shall be conducted in a manner which will not allow runoff to cross more than two (2) lots (including the lot on which the drainage originates). If this is not possible, then a drainage easement must be provided and any necessary facilities shall be constructed and installed by the developer. I I Fi ni shed floor el evati ons shall ·normall y be set one (1') feot above the top of curb at the c8nterline of the lot or one and one half (1.5~) feet above the one hundred (100) year frequency storm water surface elevation, whichever is the higher. !I I I I I Ie I 13. Off-Si te Drai n¿H:¡e: . In respect to offsi te drai nage the following provisions shall apply: a. The Developer shall be responsible for all runoff from fully developed property upstream of his proposed development. Runoff coefficients utilized to design drainage systems for the properties involved shall use the current zoning and/or the future use of the property as shown in the FLttLtre Land Use F'lan contained iil the Cit"ý' 5 Master F1I an, whi cheve:-- is the ,nost i ntensi ve Ltse. b. Effect of the development =' 5 dr-ai nag£? desi gn on downstream properties and adjacent properties shall be given proper consideration. Wat~r concentrated in streets, pipes, drains, culverts,. and channels will be moved to a recognized watercourse without damage to intervening structures or undue spreading across intervening land. I· Ie I A Jlrecogni zed ~-Jaterc:oLLrse" shall herei 11 ba def i ned as either an open channel with hydraulic characteristics which provide capacity for at least a ten (10) year frequency storm after ultimate development of its watershed, or an underground storm drain with capacity for at least a five (5) year frequency storm plus overland relief sufficient to safely discharge up to a combined ten (10) year frequency flow (based on ultimate watershed development) without damage to adjacent property. Such ten (10) year capacity shall extend at least one hund~Ed (100~) feet downstream from the point of discharge or from the Developer~s property line~ whichever is the greater distance. T.,'pical E'}:afnples of such Jlrecognized watercOLirsesu are the main channels of Mackey, Calloway, Walker, Big Fossil, Littel Bear, and Mesquite Branch Creeks, or those tributary creeks, streams, channels, or underground storm drains which meet the h)ldr,BLll i c capaci ty reqL¡i rements of a "rec:ogni zed watercoursell. Ttle Developer is responsible for constructing all offsite channelization or underground storm drain with overland relief, required to discharge concentrated stormwater from the low end of his development to the recognized watercourse, and also to obtain all the necessary easements from intervening land owners. Calculations will be required to show that connecting offsite drainageways are capable of handling any increase in runoff due to development, concentration, or diversion for at least the tí?il (10) year storm frequency. I I I I I I Ie I I Any drainage Dr floodway easements necessary due to the Developer~s alteratiDn of existing concentrated di scharge 1 oc:at ions (i . e. , ex i sti ng creeks, channels, or storm sewers) shall be acquired by the Developer at no c;:Jst to' 'the Ci t y. I I I c. Where the preliminary drainage study by the develDper indicates that additional "runoff from the developing property shall overload downstream drainage facilities and result in hazardous conditions, the City may withold approval of the development until appropriate provisions have been made. These provisions shall include any drainage studies or plans necessary to indicate the offsite drainage problem will be corrected by offsite drainage construction. I I Ie I d. When required~ the Developer will furnish to the City, ¿,~ "hold harmless agreement" and a flrelease of liability" indemnifying the City of NRH from any liabilities due to damages caused to,the downstream property owner by the discharge of storm drainage water from the said development. I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I EXISTING lCO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN MINIMUM EASEMENT WIDTH IF'ACCESS RAMP TO CHANNEL BOTTOM IS PROVIDED (INCREASE EASEMENT qo-FEET IF RAMP NOT PROVIDED) IMPROVED lOO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN FENCE ------- --.1Z..__ I FT. 1.5' ~IN. , ïMPROV~1 oo:v::R /r WATER SURFACE 7' ¡EXISTING 100-YEAR WATER SURFACE ---..-,--._~- ~FEHCE HOUSE : L EXISTING CHANNEL SECTION BEFORE IMPROVEMENTS PONDING BEHIND' LEVEE ( IOO-YEAR) lEVEE ROPOSED CONCRETE CHANNE·L LI HER FULL IOO-YEAR C.QNCRETE CHANNEL LINER IMPROVED lOO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (ADD ~O-FEET FOR EA~EMEHT WIDTH) EXISTING 100-YEAR {IMPROVED lOO-YEAR -,::ATER ':R:E~:_ ~T~U~C~_ I~MIN.: 1.5' MIN. r ----;~AR WATER' - l.! ~:-- - T I;¡II S~CE ( ~ST)~ '"" ROPOSED CONCRETE CHANNEL LINER (EXTEND LINER TO NATURAL GROUND-25 YEAR MIN. CAPAtlTY REQUIRED) PARTIAL IOO-YEAR CONCRETE CHANNEL LINER PROPOSED EARTHEN CHANNEL IMPROVED lCO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (ADD ~-FEET FOR EASEMENT WIDTH) --7------2...--.- EX I 5T I HG ' lOO-YEAR PILOT 1.5' MIH. WATER SURFACE CHANNEL I , EARTHEN CHANNEL WITH CONCRETE PILOT FIGURE 1 .. ..- "'-~.'._"'.~"'-"\~"..c.iII... ~ I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I I BUILDING SETBACK WIDTH IMPROVED IOO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (MAX. SPREAD) STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY HOUSE 25-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (MAX. SPREAD) ------....2...-___ (j 1.5' MIN. CURB & GUITER 25-YEAR WATER SURFACE MINIMUM 5-YEAR DESIGN OVERSIZE AS REQUIRED (10, 25. 50, 75-YEAR) TO MAINTAIN 25 AND lCO-YEAR SPRE~D LIMITS SHOWN ABOVE UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN CONDUIT STORM DRAIN IN STREET PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT '1.5' 25-YEAR WATER SURFACE (NOT MAJOR WATERCOURSE) IMPROVED 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN liMITS lOO-YEAR WATER SURFACE 1.5' MIN. S2.- '-.O~;-;~F\ -1::; STREET UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN CONDUIT OVERSIZE AS REQUIRED (10, 25, 50, 75-YEAR) TO MA I NTA IN 100- YEA R FLOOD PLAIN LIMITS WITHIN EASEMENT (MAY REPLACE PIPE WITH CONCRETE CHANNEL IF GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 60-IHCH DIA.) OVERLAND RELIEF SWALE -- liNE WITH CONCRETE OR OTHER MATERIAL APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. STORM DRAIN I N EASEMENT FIGURE 2 ..iï.~'CT,_,!",·>~·"'IItIt~~~~·~_~:';"'r""._'~_'~~:~~_""_'''-'' .""".-,;,;.¡¡t..-.,\"" I Ie I I , I I I I I Ie I I I I I I .e l ;¡ a ~ ~~2 :)Za .WW ., ... c"'4 ..,a:a %G.. .. ~;!~ ;~~ ~~~ a~G.. 0:;': cO ~"'-' a: ~ Q"'~ ~j~ O~U ~...w ~!ÞOO; w~z" oc__ r >- ~ t- w en ::J Z CJ w W t- a: Z .lJ.. -(,f).ø« ...J>'-U ...J Z Lt º z ~ <t 0:: a:: :J C z <~ .....J C-w c=:C::: LU:::) t-t!:) en..... c:cLl.. :&: .- W tD < Z ...... <: e::: Q :I: c: Z tJ - m,'I,!rn!~I!.I',~fIß~~1 i ~ 'I ~ ¡,~:,::~, t,~,: ¡,itt ntl:¡ffi ~W!,!~¡ Wil·t¡ t "II It I'il *~t~ f ~I t ~,. ~i' nt .. .~~~ '¡'! !~l' 4f~ ~. Illf tit ,[ '~>- - ;.;: ~"",:; :11.. ·1':.' ifr; :. 1 ;:_,','; ItÞll~t' ", t '! .tll· I l"I,~·~:::t~HHiÍ ,';H¡t~l! J ! ItL 1,1 f j; 1,.1 ~:~r ~- g ~S!~~ ~. 4. tt·: : -+~;. .":,. '..L:i~ .'.. :1, :". . \ J! ,¡:!, ':. .. I -I' I, '. i .j , IÌ!' I . _ . _ Sl ,:::\ffl:f, ~ I r.~ T '~", "'~:~':, ;:~ :':; :;:; :~;; :::;¡J;: iW! .;',; :¡ .~: ¡":' ,~, .;~ j, I.i ~ I~ ¡H; ~: : 1Õ,_ '-': ~ =_!! ~¡ ìIr ! 'I ~i~ ~ ¡HI n [4=-1',l~~':Y¡; ;g; ;H; Hi! t tt¡ ¡:iil~; ilH Ii '6',: :t42 8= ~!! ~~ ~~ :t~; riJ} :;:¡ ~jÌ r! . ... . - ~ê § 1j : jl i 1¡¡¡li ' :ft"!!i R 1-l:U::k':~~ :!hè ~li ill! ,tli ¡m ¡!!l ft·.!:i . £~E :::::;p~~. ¡If! 1:¡ :¡~ '¡! ' .>-+- -!£.::. g '.: :I¡: 1':1,' ¡Hi I h+ ¡;U HU .j~:·¡:~::~:::H~~ 1fEJ::;:~i:; ~r! : i~ -r '... -. -._' jI í ~i ~~ ! u.~ 1 t ,:¡¡+jnt~ ~ ... I" t .~~, r;¡ .;c .nJ +::-~..-....:=1·...t.tll.."'" ..~ ...t.oT.... ~~rt -I- -rl-H-H.... ~~' "". ;~ 'r 'II' m~ ~ :: 1;1 iHi:m .If W! i! '1' j:-.t;,~-:;(:~f¡;.;::::~ ;;U ¡ I~; :::=1:::: ;id tt~ I Ij-j l~ it / ~ ': Ij( :!I r!P ¡'J.'J :H¡ .::1! ~ ~~ :;:¡ !ii t I :tJ ~L :i;' , . f ,~4?L¥t~~h:;t~!~!::i: ~tii it~ ;~l:lm¡ ¡~il !tÜ + #~ ~ijl' /)(.) ;,: líi~ i)' fi d ¡W ¡iii L r f 1; "::',', :,:",I!. I'!I;¡":, "'!.·I':i U ~ J ,~..·U. ~ t · t·rt:: :;:.1::t:.:::.;·,+¡:i:::. :;:: l'U lit! ·:::tij~· till IU: jF..£=f£.;i'--jf..I~ .:~~: ::t: ~i.' fit' ¡¡it ~¡; ~f .. 'I'll! lr: t1::Hf t ~n ¡~-:~.::,-,,=:: ¡:::.. r..:~ ...' ... :... I~ '-.:...~/'.::..r.~;;.-.'.T.¡;. I:¡ .:~..; ,_ 11:....:1 t.. n ;¡¡ ilii ¡Hi F.t! H . t-; ¡~j ¡ill i ..-- ~j~ :~~Hm~ ~_4 ¡if ~~ÜLt üg fffi $~ ~~~ ;;:: :lli 1~¡ ~ti í flit im 1m Ii ! 11- ~~,:;litIIJr¡r t ~ t~tit<1 11 · -+t:++:·t"::'t:::-;t:I'+t~~;:¡~~~t.:l:t}·t;¡;;~+1J fd~1\1';¡ '1:::i:~i:~f:l.II~IU!tf ~:t4'''lum· ~¡,.u t:tt ·1 ~ .~,.- '¡!.~~.M-~I '~HHI\~'~ ~*"'1';'~,f~tH ~I H ... ~I; 1 1 !I'~ t- ... ...~ .,. ~¡.. t ~ !I~ 1.4! , ~ ,I. ,I ...~ · ;1 ~t , I, H ~""~: ;'~ .,If¡,¡,rt,~~ H I l '~,h~ ' 'ij ¡ t+-+--'~~~.t·l'hl~~ Ifh "Üllil ;¡U~~ ~ . ..f.'III'I,itH tr i ~¡ filii! tlt ~ ~!r' µ !I ~ l' t titl j:¡~ ;1;: ¡Ir: :ill ~ µ¡ :ij*,::~~ ,'A r ~ ~r~l~ it~ It t ;* 'h't ..¡ ,,I ~ 11 Ii t' :~~ ,; . ~ I-f',,,!,, dti ¡ HI ht ~I.';;'~ f~~\II ~ I /' ,:;. "': ¡ill ,I ¡ I I !II II I ~ ;' :::: :,;. i.¡ ii I ~ t ft·; . '~ , ::Œ!:<~ ..:, .::: 'I ~~?;{ :~~ ~f~~ {~ ~ ,;: .::' :;~ ::,; ¡W ,; i; ::;: ;:i¡ ¡¡¡, :¡;, .¡~:' ., ª; ~ ;;'!!'I¡;P ¡i': ij, 1 @ .1i I, ! ~, :i oJ i~LI,!':' ::¡i'g! ~;;:;1~~:I:/ /: i/ ¡ ¡At ~!=!~E.. '" :::: !;1¡ ilU lW ¡in Hi! f1 hi ,4:L ~, .. ~ ~ -_L Z ¡1: :¡¡~!it! i ~:l1H :!l! ~H¡ !i Jtt *f~Lt:: :~~:i::~¡ Ei~j.:jf:j i!j{ tlt~, tf ili~H':::¡ :;!! ;¡¡; iHi t11~ m¡ in¡ lIB tþf It _ -:f~-E-- ~ 2 ':¡ili~¡¡¡imntl HgH'!!' l ÜL §ægr.~:~:il:::¡t:~::~i::Ø::t¡¡ït1 un:4-1=-=';::':¡(;HitH:llij iUmmH:l. tift -rt -t- - ft ~ iii;.; I". ':iI ' ¡ :ii!! ¡ I , fl,£ ;',:::: ;;:' ;;;; v: l1:1n (,!':l: ::;~ ¡ i : i I J J-¡e _ _ ;¡; ;¡:; ;:¡, :m I" ¡, i ¡:;;,:: ! ¡Î lr'~~' ,k;~ ~ ~ ,~:II!!i¡ !:ir¡ ¡ HH~!ift t 1 :'~f:~:ht~:::!::!iV~t:¡t:~Æ:¡~,t¡ ni-' t:l-i.[::J~~-~;~:~P¡!¡¡i:~!~tf! !Ul1Wmtt ¡ ! ','.l~~:=f'¥* ~ Q !i! iÞ~IiW Hi ¡ if ill Wi, 'fËEf-f:JE: ;:1,' ¡¡it r/;W~¡Wj ii: ¡¡I!! -Ë:Ë:¡ ,!;.¡¡Ii m¡!ill tl i! ig¡ aU t ~li i itl :I-t, - :: $ .J g; ¡m ~~ ¡Hi t 1 : JlfiH ',.1 H f :E L;;I' ~!¡: Y Li(: ,i)f:; g ¡i ¡ It! i ~ i -E~:t." .. ¡¡g rl¡i un Hi! ~n ¡HUm t. ~~ :=: 0 :i I&. ;1,' ',:1:'1;' ill,' · pfl'f l~tlfi~:t~fl!1 :t J- -~i- t~.~. ,'~ ":1\:,' .: ¡ ,tW; I.¡il::~: ::I[! Ufl' ~ J:r.: - ¡:: ~:~~ii ~iI, ¡; ·¡'rlt' :JJ1r tUf j'lt ~¡I I:~ t N .MI If,~' ~t t t~ ¡" I t ~'l, '."t1..i~_Jt ·t:,1 ....11... it t .. 1:t- -;;.' III ;H:' · .', It ' ,~ _ _ Z '.I\tlll · 'I , ¡It!' , -. '1,' :J':r':- I·A,' .j.. I.. ·t~ ... ...-~ -", .~ ' 11 Iii I HI 'i', il,;t ~ ~ C( ~I!':I';I' ;,'~I!i: ¡,',If,;!' r¡r~' :' ¡! '.~, HI~II ~f ~'I I' , .~~ ~ti ,::J1¡¡ 1u It,i ¡ ¡milE rfl~I' 1',·1 + '. I- I- ::: :f~¡I!: IIIi 1111 ¡ ii¡! 'W fl II: 1 ~lI.-I)·":I,' :?J, , , 11,1. .tt, ;.1, ¡J ; 1 f +!- t--",;", ~,dl, .I. I "III l¡il II:: j'lti I r __ ,!r "Ir :/.,IJ" ò '" r '·":1' IIII ,!, I 2 ",II/:!I' 'I' : '~\I; l1 1 I ,-/11.j,,/:' ïJ, ;:1\ :'!I:; ; II' ! :1 ,:!I ,I' ,I!: 4il II ·'I'! ¡rli' 11i'~' I, :;¡:!!J;' J.t! JI':' :!I'~fl',I:!1 ,;:í ;', I!:! I 'I I' I.-,!, II tjl¡ ! :'11 "';Ii'I! l! .. ~!:!¡¡¡i~H¡H:ii!1 ..JII! I ! if '~1';/1 r:11:~; .., :::i :¡t;:;:r1~! ¡!: I !t-l·r...., i::::!:~ ~qid:'¡ ij!:i¡¡ /1.1 ~ . ':: ¡;i:li!,dh1tf IUWd!ii j! ¡Iii 1- ::j;f:1 i{;:.1:;,:I:';j:: iq: ;::l~:;:iI: it:~þi± .:J~¥P ;::!;!¡::~H iU¡ :¡dq!ifIH r~:I~, : .::~:... ~;: ;;:: I;;: !~: ¡ ~¡¡ ~u.: ~; ~i~ ~ i ! ~i ~Ú' ¿~ tf ;:~:~: Y;: I ¡; ¡; ¡ ¡ t: i::;!'; :': 1 ¡!! I ! ~ ,! ,¡ H' ;~ '~~ :::.:~,: :~; ~::: ~1; ~;l~ :::: ;;~¡ ; n I t~~ : ~~, ,7:~: .. ,,,,I'hllt, 4ifJ ;¡t~ ..,,¡,¡ , ~j :11 rl ¡ ¡Ef r:L....._._. ,I 'r" '... ,.., d' "" 'II' ",. lftJh:'" 'I' ".. ':1' ., ¡, "J' !ill .¡ I U I .ltc :f:.- .. ;;; ¡¡¡i i,:; ¡~;¡ :i¡: ,~; ¡¡~:U: f ¡L~f~~ -~i¡jF' :'¡:¡¡: :." ¡ if'~ª ~:¡ ~ ¡ ¡ ¡ n:, j:¡~ ~~ :;j, ~,~ ~ ¡¡ ¡ ¡ ,:::,:::; 'i:; ¡Ü;j s:: ~~: · ......' ¡¡¡; Hi; ¡: it Ii! i ¡¡¡11¡i¡: Îi i ! ; I Hf4 j-;:~W::::¡;i:: '!:: ; ~ i i !:::¡:::, ¡;! ¡ ;:!; 4 ~i-¡~~1=!: ::': ;,,¡¡!! ; ii¡ it;! i-! i ¡ tililliÜ ii If ¡H! --ill: _,~ .. ..' '" ::!¡ mdffi lfir d:liijj if!! I rJi 1f!.H E ~± :,¡::::p:p1IT i il: ~~p:;p¡ : ¡ ¡ r,iIt ¡-tFE :..,:¡ : ::: !i H I ~ li !î n;: J!?: [j ~l "'T ":~ ~ :::::, ¡¡¡¡ r:~¡ ¡iji ¡¡if :~¡¡¡¡¡¡, ¡it;; !f H H ~i '~~~,¡,::i::;: ::¡:iE¡:¡f¿~ ;i;:t:¡;¡. ¡¡ü Wi ~ËI:~~~; :~,¡ ;~¡ ~!: i¡; ;~;;;;H~; ;l,¡1j it · ... ....,. 1,1 ~;. 'I~II¡' ·"'·'61it" ' +, +-Jr......, ..·'1'·....·· ..1. ...~t~.., ·'It.... ....Htt. + ··.:1,1.. I;! 1~. t~T ttq...:,~. ttl. .':," ",1: 11·' ¡~1'1:~¡tt.t!~!~tt t~.HtHt1.f ·tT1-4 ~'I'I.~'''I:~'' _"f' .+~ ,~:+,··,t!~ tlt!~f t ~-H-~~ :. .:;: do:.'mrH:H- .... I·.4~ltt·:t't- tt ' .... ~..;,¡~ I '. 'I t ,trl"J f· ¡ rt ~t 'rf rt· ~-t--f--t·", ..~..~ ·t,~ ~. · "'1I'·~h¡l: It, I.l.L I' ... ~.:~ ·'H~ .., ,.!t t:!1 'tt t ... " ·~1· H' '. " '·1 t·· tl" t-i-'·l' ··tf··· ....~! ····t:i··t·t· '1j r -l I i~t- ' ." ." ¡r.t' tt~ .1,. ,., It' tt ,:: '+~I!" ~ ~t t H rh~' t~! uJ i t ,: i 1 ¡ '-r· ... .. :1t' 'i~~ 1; ···ï;~·t~~H tit I I : I; :41 :frilHh It ~ti '~:I!'f L ¡ r; ~ ~ e--""· ... ~ "'''' ~:~~ ~ ~ : cS ; . -- ... +J-:~~;.1=-I . :+:f: r =1-:::t::t= I ~=t ::;=t::'t=1_ -l-t-t- .t-t ~~ .. ~a ::» o 0 o z _ ell. , . - ó ~nOH ~3d S3H~NI-A.lISN3~NI "Y:JNIVY I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .... 0: ~ C):I: Z<..:> -~ Zo Z..J «I.&.. =eLrJ c- o. UJ (,.!:) <: z ~ < c:: Q ::t: ~ Z z <.:::r -J c... 0:: L.U I- CJ:) <%: ~ UJ 0:: ~ (.!J ..... u. ,. 60 r- .. 80 .-- . LO'" :- 90·- ço tJO o "nJ ~NINNn~ - ONO~JS ~3d J.33J ~enJ N' 3~ttYH:>~la ~ ª~ ~ R ~ ! I '" -['0. ZOo ~ &AI ~ &AI en 16- o . .000·- tooo· . zooa .' '000· ðOOOO· 80000 . L 0000· 90000· çoooo· ÞOOOO' ? .. ~ . ~ ... ~:' : ft ë .. .. - - - --.. "'~ ~~ Q. ~ ~a: 00 &.. W'" ". cr~ <II( ~ ~ ~ ~ & 1" (()()()()- .. lOOOO' - ---- ----. ..' . 1< Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I SECTION 2-06 STREET LIGHTING A. INSTALLATION Street lights in all subdivisions shall be installed on approved metal poles. 1. Poles must be approved by a public electric utility holding a City franchise and the Director of Public Works. a 2. Poles shall be contracted and paid for by the Developer during the construction phase of a subdivision and before building permits are issued. 3. Poles not purchased through a public electric utility holding a City franchise shall be certified in writing by an engineer to meet the specifications as required by a public electric utility holding a City franchise with one fixture an~ necessary wiring. B. LOC¡~TIOf\J The location of street lights shall be as follows: 1. At all intersections. 2. Where a new street intersects an old street. 3. Where a block is six hundred (bOO') feet or longer a street light shall be installed every six hundred (600') feet or mi d'--bl ock \rJhi chevet- is the shortest di stance. 4. If more than one mid-block light is required they shall be installed to create an equal balance of light thrOLtghoL\t the enti re 1 ength of' the bl oek. 5. If a cul-de-sac block is four hundred (400~) feet or longer, a street light shall be installed in the end of the CLtl-de-sac. b. Street lights shall be installed at any other location as may þe directed by. the Director of Public Works for the welfare and safety of the community. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS tiepartment: Subject: Administration Friends of the Library Gift Shop ~ 11/14/88 - Council Meeting Date: GN 88-107 Agenda Number:_ Please see the attached memo from Arlita Hallam, Library Director, to Dennis Horvath. In order to provide additional financial support for Library purposes without increasing the ad valorem tax requirement, the staff supports this request of the Library Board and the Friends of the Library. I ~. ~ Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize establishment of the Friends of the Library Gift Shop. e I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _. opera~.I. Budget _' ~. Other "-/ J J I-- 1--. V'~~ Department Head Signature I----~-~·_- . . . , .....-...--. .-.....- Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available 1<1/ /~ , City Manager . Finance DIrector 1 I· J{9rth Richland Hills Public Library e·· . . I I I I I I' Ie I I I' I I I I Ie I TO: Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager FROM: Arlita Hallam, Library Director DATE: November 7, 1988 SUBJECT: USE OF FRONT "LIBRARY DIRECTOR'S" OFFICE FOR FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY GIFT SHOP The Library Board has approved our recommendation that the front library office, which has been designated as the "Library Director's Office" but used temporarily by city staff during City Hall remodelling, be utilized as a Friends of the Library Gift Shop. I have been using the "Assistant Director's Office," and, since it does not seem likely that that position will be filled in the near future, the front office location, with its visible, outside entrance is ideal for a gift shop. The Friends' gift shop will function like a hospital gift shop' or museum shop, selling book or library-related items (posters, bookmarks, Library of Congress calendars, and consignment donations) which will not compete with area merchants. The shop will be staffed by Friends members and volunteers, with all proceeds used to purchase library materials. bI CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Personnel .bject: Reccmnendation to approve bid for City Property ~nsurance for 1988-89 Council Meeting Date: 11--14-88- Agenda Number: PU 88-56 We advertised for bids to renew our property insurance which expires November 15, 1988, and received bids fram eight companies (see attached list). The (3) lowest bids are: Company Deductible Premimn I.exington Insurance Company $5000 $14,990.57 Hartford Insurance Company 1000 18,782.00 5000 17,430.00 Employers Casualty 1000 19,363.00 3000 17,874.00 5000 16,384.00 Although I.exington sul:mitted the low bid, we feel that a $5000 deductible is too high. We believe a $1000 deductible would be IIDre beneficial to the City and as such, Hartford sul:mitted the lowest bid. There are other factors that were considered as we evaluated the bids. Hartford is oùr current carrier. If we insured with any other carrier, the new carrier wo~ld have the right to inspect our properties and the City would have to absorb the ~nse of making the changes required by the carrier. Also, any new carrier would have ~e right to cancel our policy within the first (90) days if they so desired. Current carriers, and in this case Hartford, are prohibited by the State Board of Insurance fran inspecting properties once they have suhnitted a bid to renew the insurance and are further prohibited fran cancelling a policy except for the non-payment of premiums by the insured. We feel that Hartford's bid of $18, 782 with a $1000 deductible would best serve the interest of the Ci ty . Recamendation: It is recmmended that the City Council approve the Hartford Insurance Canpany's bid of a $1000 deductible with an annual premium of $18, 782 and award Hartford the City's property insurance coverage for 1988-89. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget --X- .ther _ -~~- Department Head S<9);ature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number 08-01-00-4500; 08-02-00-4500 SUf~ie~s Available , Finance Director Page 1 of 2 I Ie PROPERTY INSURANCE BIDS I LEXINGIDN INSURANCE COMPANY Premium I $5000 deductible 14,990.57 HARrFORD INSURANCE COMPANY I () $1000 deductible 18,782 5000 deductible 17,430 I EMPIDYERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CG1PANY $1000 deductible 19,363 I 3000 deductible 17,874 5000 deductible 16,384 I NATIONWIDE INSURANCE CG1PANY $1000 deductible 24,828 5000 deductible 23,686 I 25000 deductible 20,801 APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY Ie $2500 deductible 26,294.90 . AMERICAN GENERAL LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY I $ 250 deductible 27,802 1000 deductible 24,823 I 3000 deductible 23,896 5000 deductible 23,353 I NORTHBROOK NATIONAL INSURANCE .CG1PANY $5000 deductible 28,849 I WAUSAU INSURANCE cœPANY $1000 deductible 30,553 I 5000 deductible 29,108 e I I Subject: Ie I I I I I I Ie CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Management Services Council Meeting Date: 11 /14/88 Agenda Number: PU 88-57 Ratify Purchase Order 04301 to IBM in the amount of $121,601. On October 24, 1988, at 10:00 a.m., sealed proposals were opened for the IBM 400 Computer System. IBM submitted two proposals; one for $131,600 and one for $f35,631. The lower price for the System 400 would apply if placed on order before November 4, 1988 since it would fall in the present pricing year under the State of Texas contract. After November 4, 1988, the System would be in IBM's new pricing structure to the State. Based on verbal approval by the Mayor and Council, a purchase order was issued to take advantage of the $4,031 cost savings. The System 400 is scheduled to be delivered the week of November 14, 1988. In addition, IBM has advised the City of North Richland Hills they will be unable to ship the printer with our system due to back orders. However, we must take immediate possession of the computer to obtain the better pricing. They will deduct the cost of the printer, $10,000, from the purchase order and it can be purchased from another source. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council ratify Purchase Order 04301 in the amount of $121,601 to IBM and authorize the Director of Management Services. to obtain a printer from an alternate source in an amount not to exceed $10,000. 01-20-01-6500 02-20-01-6500 13-00-95-6500 02-09-86-6500 27.5% 60.0% 6.5% 6.0% 100.0% Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget e Other ~ x Finance Review Acct. Number See Above nds Available , Finance Director ~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS _epartment: Subject: Public Works N 11/14/88 - Council Meeting Date: PW 88-41 Agenda Number: Authorize Partial Use of Landscape Budget for Watauga Road Project The CIP Committee recommends that the City Council authorize a $120,000 budget for the Watauga Road Landscaping Project (approved 7/28/87) to landscape the median in Watauga Road from Rufe Snow Drive to Davis Boulevard at the conclusion of the street construction. They recommend $70,000 be used to install the irrigation system, provide two (2) A-Plantings (as designed by the landscape architect), and to hydromulch the remaining median area. The remaining $50,000 is to be set aside to utilize as matching funds (50-50) to assist the Beautification Committee in obtaining private financial support for street beautification purposes. Recommendation: The CIP Committee recommends that the City Council direct the staff to proceed with obtaining bids for landscaping of Watauga Road as outlined above, and authorize the Beautification Committée to proceed with a private sector funding program, utilizing matching funds. e Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operate Budget . Other GO Finance Review Acct. Number 13-01-86-6150 ds Available . Finance Director I t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Pace 1 of ~___ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public t\brks ubject: Approve Proposed 1988/89 Expenditures for County OVer .Lay .Program .per l.nter .Loca.L Agreement Council Meeting Date:ll/14/88 Agenda Number:PW 88-42 The City Council approved at their 1988/89 budget session the paying for street improvements constructed by the County crews fran the CIP funds. This cover sheet is provided as a fonnal means for the Council to approve this action and set up a budget of $77,100. Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available in CIP Unspecified Street account. The proposed funding is identified as follows: {j From: 13-90-99-4310 Unspecified 1987 Streets - $77,100 To: 13-50-87-6150 1988/89 County Overlay Program - $77,100 Reconrnendation: The staff recœmends approval of the 1988-89 Expenditures for County Overlay Program Per Interlocal AgreenEnt as stated above. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget e Oth¡,r' /¿ GO Acct. Number See above SUffiCi~S Available À1tJ . Finance Director I p¡ AQ - ~~ City Manager Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works Department: SUbject: Approve Budget for Water Line Improvements W.itll 1988/8~ ~1i~l;~llcul~u;:) Sl.Lt:::eL &:COl15h~tion 11/14/88 - Council Meeting Date: PW 88- 43 Agenda Number: A budget for the street improveIœnts on the subject project has already been approved by the City Council September 14, 1987, but the water line improvements budget has not been previously considered by the Council. The consulting City Engineer has estimated the budget requirerænt to be $157, 000 for miscellaneous water line reconstruction to be accarplished with the subject street reconstruction. funding Source: The following transfer fram Utility ClP will be necessary. Fran: 02-86-99-6700 Utility Unspecified $157,000 'lb: 02-86-09-4200 Water System Engineering $9,000 02-86-09-6700 Water System Construction $148,000 Recorrmendation' : The staff recarrnends approval of the subject budget for water system improvements and transfer of funds as indicated above. ' Finance Review REV Acct. Number Sufficient F ds Available ~~" 1 See above ~ ~&.~ --- . Finance Director ....../ --- t'"'! .,.., .f :-, ..-. . f .11 :' ,-.' .' I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: Public t\brk~ .Ubject: I I I The cost of Change Order No. 4 is $39, 488 . Council Meeting Date: 11/14/88 Approval of Starnes Road Street & Drainage Improvements - Change Order No. 4 Agenda Number:PW 88- 44 '!he proposed Change Order No. 4 is for construction of 4 foot wide reinforced concrete sidewalk adjacent to the back of curb on the north side of Starnes Road fran Shady Hollow Lane east to T.iroberhill Drive. The budgeted arrount for this sidewalk construction as approved by the Council on September 12, 1988 is $50,000. Recarmendation: The staff recomnends the Council approve Change Order No. 4 in the amount of $39,488. e Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget e Other. ¿ --'D- Acct. Number , '3-0'3-~5-6' ?5 SUff;:ZZ; A~ 1J) ì<lt{~~ City Manager . Finance Director ~~~ '-:::> ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Iii p ::} ~:; 1 C f ---1-..--- I· I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I KNOWL TON- ENGLISH-FLOWERS, CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas D rn©[gO~[g~ OCï 2 4 198d ~ October 21, 1988 Hr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 RE: 3-342, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS STARNES ROAD PAVING AND DRAINAGE! CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 Attached is Change Order No. 4 for the referenced project which has been signed by the Contractor, Austin Paving Company. This change order covers the cost of constructing a 4-foot wide, 4-inch thick reinforced concrete sidewalk, with I-inch cushion sand, on the north side of Starnes Road from the west end at Shady Hollow Lane to the east end at Timberhill Drive. The proposed sidewalk will be located about 4-feet back-of-curb (if possible) with minor adjustments in alignment as required to avoid obstructions such as power' poles, fire hydrants, etc. In some places, the sidewalk may have to be constructed adjacent to the back of curb if approved ,by the Council. It is not anticipated that any extra retaining wall construction will be required. However, if additional retaining walls are required, a separate change order will be initiated. After approval by the Council, we will instruct the Contractor to proceed with the sidewalk construction. Please return a fully executed copy of the approved change order form to our office for our files and for the contractor. Should you have any questions concerning this change order, please do not hesitate to call. ~~ RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E. RYA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Senior Assistant City Manager Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks Mr. Kevin Miller, P.E., A~sistant Director of Public Yorks Mr. Ken Matheson, City Inspector I- I. I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I" I K-E-F NO. 3-342 CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO THE CONTRACT VHICH VAS DATED MARCH 15, 1988 Between CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (OYNER) (CONTRACTOR) And AUSTIN PAVING For (Description of Project) STARNES ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 6 of the General Conditions of the Contract, this Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to change the work of the Project as follows: Construct 4-inch thick, 4-foot wide reinforced concrete sidewalk on the north side of Starnes Road from Shady Hollow Lane (Sta. 0+20) to Timberhill Drive (Sta. -0+80). Sidewalk will be located 4-foot back-of-curb with alignment adjustments as required to avoid conflict with power poles or other obstacles which are not relocated. Add the following 'new item to existing Contract items: ITEM NO. UNIT PRICE QUANTITY TOT AL, COST DESCRIPTION UNIT 4P. 3,000 psi Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk wi. 1" Cushion Sand in Place L. F. $8.00 4,936 $ 39,488.00 $ 39.488.00 $ 39.488.0.0 947,197.44 $ 986,685.44 SUB-TOTAL . · . . . TOTAL CHANGE ORDER. COST . · . . . EXISTING CONTRACT AMOUNT . · . . . REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT . Contract completion time shall be increased by (30) days because of this change. CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE: ~ /J =-------- By: ¿:¡ e- -~- Date: B. . Bertr~, Executive Vice President ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE: By: ~~{ ~ Date: October 11, , 1988 10-;2./ , 1988 OYNER'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE: By: Date: , 1988