Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC 1987-01-12 Agendas
I I ,I 'I I I I I I I I ,I I I I 'I .1 ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 12, 1987 - 6:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Presentation by Mr. Tom Selle - . Marcell Studio - Mayor Echols (Suggested Discussion Time - 2 Minutes) 2. Discussion of the Bicentennial of the U.S. Constitution (Marion Staples, Chairman Bicentennial Committee) (Suggested Discussion Time - 15 Minutes) 3. Schedule of Joint Work Session (January 19, 1987) B. H. & L. Joint Venture - Reference Wilson Lane (Suggested Discussion Time - 2 Minutes) 4. PS 86-57 Amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance Regarding the Use of Retention Ponds in Drainage Design, Ordinance No. 1435 (Agenda Item No. 35) (Suggested Discussion Time - 20 Minutes) I Page 2 I NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN I I 5. PS 86-42 Request of Ellis-Ellis Associates for Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 2, Hightower Plaza I Addition (Agenda Item No. 34) (Suggested Discussion Time - 10 I Minutes) I 6. GN 87-2 New Signs for Municipal Facilities (Agenda Item No. 39) II (Suggested Discussion Time - 3 Minutes) I 7. Revisions to Sign Ordinance (See Attached Proposed Ordinance) I (Suggested Discussion Time - 10 Minutes) I 8. GN 87-6 Proposed Charter Amendments I (Agenda Item No. 43) (Suggested for Discussion of Procedure - Not Content - Discussion Time - I 5 Minutes) I 9. PU 87-3 Proposed Change Order for Police Department Addition (Agenda Item I No. 47) (Suggested Discussion Time - 3 Minutes) I 10. Street Assessment Policy (Suggested Discussion Time - 8 I Minutes) I 11. Other Items I I I I I I I I I I I I I I il I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 12. *Executive Session (Suggested Discussion Time - 10 Minutes) a. Personnel Discussion b. Pending Litigation *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 12, 1987 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. NUMBER ITEM 1. Call to Order ACTION TAKEN 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting December 8, 1986 5. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 6. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (33, 38, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, & 54) 7. PZ 86-53 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee, to rezone part of Tracts 18 & 2A, D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, from AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located east of Flamingo Estates north of the railroad) 8. Ordinance No. 1422 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. PZ 86-54 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee, to rezone Tracts 18 & 2A, D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, from AG (Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Family) (Located east of Eden Addition north of the railroad) 10. Ordinance No. 1423 11. PZ 86-56 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of 8. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tracts 2 & 2A1, J.C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from AG (Agriculture) to C-1 (Commercial) (Located at the southeast corner of Keller Smithfield Road and Shady Grove Road) 12. Ordinance No. 1424 13. PZ 86-58 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2, J.C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from AG (Agriculture) to C-2 (Commercial) (Located at the northeast corner of Keller Smithfield Road and Wilson Lane) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 14. Ordinance No. 1425 15. PZ 86-59 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of B. H. & l. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2, J.C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located on the south side of Shady Grove Road east of Keller Smithfield Road) 16. Ordinance No. 1426 17. PZ 86-60 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of B. H. & l. Joint Venture to rezone Tract 5A, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182, and Tract 1, H.L. Allen Survey, Abstract 65, from AG (Agriculture) to C-l (Commercial) (located on the west side of Precinct line Road south of Shady Grove Road) 18. Ordinance No. 1427 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 19. PZ 86-62 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 5E1A, W. C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182, from AG (Agriculture) to 0-1 (Office District) (Located on the west side of Precinct Line Road north of the proposed Wilson Lane) 20. Ordinance No. 1428 21. PZ 86-63 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of B. H. & l. Joint Venture to rezone Tract 8BIA, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, and a portion of Tract 5E1A, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182 from AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family) (located west of Precinct Line Road north of proposed Wilson Lane) 22. Ordinance NO. 1429 I Page 5 I NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN I I 23. PZ 86-64 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Tony I Avanzini to rezone Tract 3A2, David Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, from AG (Agriculture) to I R-2 (Single Family) (Located at the northeast corner of Eden Road I and Everglade Drive) I 24. Ordinance No. 1430 25. PZ 86-65 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC I HEARING - Request of Delbert Stembridge, Trustee, to rezone I Tract 3, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from AG I (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located at the northeast I corner of Starnes Road and Douglas Lane) I 26. Ordinance No. 1431 I 27. PZ 86-66 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Debra I Jackson to rezone Tract 3Al, William Cox Survey, Abstract 321, I from AG (Agriculture) to C-1 (Commercial) (Located at the northwest corner of Davis I Boulevard and Turner Drive) I 28. Ordinance No. 1432 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 6 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 29. PZ 86-67 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Charles Schreiner Nelson to rezone Tract 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, and Tract 1, Alexander Hood Survey, Abstract 683, from AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located on the west side of Keller Smithfield Road north of Bursey Road) 30. Ordinance No. 1433 31. PZ 86-69 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Charles Schreiner Nelson to rezone Tract 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from AG (Agriculture) to C-2 (Commercial) (Located at the southwest corner of Keller Smithfield Road and Wilson Lane) 32. Ordinance No. 1434 *33. PS 86-54 Request of Harston Gravel Company for replat of Lots 5RA & 5R2A, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition (located on the southwest corner of Wuligar Way and Browning Court) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 7 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 34. PS 86-42 Request of Ellis-Ellis Associates for Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 2, Hightower Plaza Addition (located on the southeast corner of Rufe Snow and Hightower) 35. PS 86-57 Amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance Regarding the Use of Retention Ponds in Drainage Design, Ordinance No. 1435 36. SO 87-1 Request of Ike Harris Co. for Variance to Section 6.3(a) of the Sign Ordinance regarding the location of Real Estate Project Signs 37. SO 87-2 Request of Burk Collins Investments for Variance to Section 4.1(b) of the Sign Ordinance for an additional ground sign at Olde Towne Square Center *38. GN 87-1 Interlocal Assistance Agreement for the Greater Dallas-Fort Worth Region, Resolution No. 87-2 *39. GN 87-2 New Signs for Municipal Facilities *40. GN 87-3 Request to Authorize a liability Risk Analysis Study by the Wyatt Company I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 8 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 41. GN 87-4 Appointment to Various Boards/Commissions *42. GN 87-5 Resolution Supporting Tort Reform, Resolution No. 87-3 43. GN 87-6 Proposed Charter Amendments *44. GN 87-7 Resolution Supporting Texas War on Crime, Resolution No, 87-4 *45. PU 87-1 Bid award to Business Interiors for Office Furniture in the Amount of $14,424.92 *46. PU 87-2 Bid Award to Beall Contractors Supply for one 35 H.P. Concrete/Asphalt Saw in the Amount of $5,825.00 *47. PU 87-3 Proposed Change Order for Police Department Addition *48. PU 87-4 Parking lot Paving, Park Maintenance Facility on Chapman Road *49. PU 87-5 Emergency Bid Award to Orkin Pest Control for Termite Extermination at Proposed Library and Recreation Center I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 9 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *50. PW 87-1 Bridge Load Posting Agreement with State Highway Department, Resolution No. 87-1 *51. PW 87-2 Change Order 1, Glenview Drive Utility Adjustment *52. PW 87 -3· Big Bear Creek Wastewater Interceptor System Contract Between City of North Richland Hills, Trinity River Authority and Three Other Cities *53. PW 87-4 Proposed Amendment - Change Orders 5-11 for 1985 Miscellaneous Water and Sewer System Improvements to Lowell B. Allison Contract in the Amount of $37,518.00 *54. PW 87-5 ' Request of SAM Joint Venture for Release of a 10 Foot Utility Easement in Eden Addition, Resolution No. 87-6 55. Citizen Presentation 56. Adjournment I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I" I City of j\(órth Richland Hills, Texas ~t1_ ~,'-- ¡:I ~ MEMORANDUM January 12, 1987 TO: Rodger Line, City Manager FROM: Richard Royston, Director of Planning and Development SUBJECT: Proposed Revisions to the Sign Ordinance Several weeks ago we provided the City Council with a revised Sign Ordinance for their review and comment. At that time we also placed on the agenda a revision to the Ordinance covering the Real Estate directional signs. The proposed revision for that specific issue was passed by the City Council. Since the overall document was presented we have had no specific comment or directive from the City Council as to what action should be taken. On the January 12, 1987, agenda there is a request from Ike Harris and Company, who is developing the Windsor Park Garden Homes, for a variance to the Sign Ordinance to allow the placement of a temporary project sign in the adjacent commercial property on Rufe Snow Drive. This is specifically prohibited in the current Ordinance. However, this is an area which the Staff is suggesting for revision in the Sign Ordinance. It is the Staff's recommendation that the provisions of the Ordinance be revised to allow project signs to be placed in any vacant commercial district and prohibited in all residential zones outside the actual project area. The revised Ordinance reflects this proposal. For that reason we would recommend that the City Council deny the variance requested and proceed with consideration of the general Ordinance revision at the next City Council meeting January 26, 1987. Since the applicant has only two units under construction in his project a two week delay should not be detrimental to that operation. We have enclosed with this memo additional copies of the Sign Ordinance revisions for the City Council's use. (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76180 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I !I I I I I I I" I ORDINANCE NO. .. ---~-- AN ORDINANCE REGULATING SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; DEFINING TERMS; REQUIRING A PERMIT FOR ERECTION OF A SIGN AND PROVIDING FOR A SCHEDULE OF FEES; REGULATING THE AREA OF SIGNS PERMITTED; PROVIDING FOR A SERIES OF GENERAL CONDITIONS; REGULATING TEMPORARY SIGNS; REGULATING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF SIGNS; REGULATING BILLBOARDS; PROHIBITING OBNOXIOUS SIGNS AND SIGNS EXPLOITING SEX; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF A FINE NOT LESS THAN $50.00 NOR IN EXCESS OF $1000.00; AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HERETO; PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE IN FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND AFTER THE DATE OF ITS ADOPTION AND PUBLICATION. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: ARTICLE 1. PREAMBLE: PURPOSE OF THE ORDINANCE The sign regulations as herein established have been made for the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of North Richland Hills. The Ordinance contains standards regulating the use, size, location, construction and maintenance of signs. The intent of the regulations is to protect values within the City of North Richland Hills, to enhance the beauty of the City and to protect the general public from damage and injury which may be caused by the unregulated construction of signs. ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS SECTION 2.1 AREA OF SIGN. ttArea of Sign" shall mean the total area within the extreme perimeter of the attraction area intended to draw attention to the sign, including all open spaces and supports which the sign rest upon if said supports are designed to attract attention to sign. The area of the sign with two (2) faces, approximately opposed, shall be that of the larger face if such condition prevails; but, if the angle between the planes of the faces exceeds thirty (30) degrees the total area of both faces shall be considered the sign area. For multi-sided or circular signs, the area shall be the total projected area. SECTION 2.2 BILLBOARD. "Billboard" shall mean any freestanding sign, signboard or I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I outdoor advertising display which is used for advertising purposes or display purposes, except advertising displays used exclusively: (a) To advertise the sales or lease of the property upon which such advertising displays are to be placed. ( b ) To designate the name of the owner or the occupant of the premises upon which such advertising display is placed, or to identify such premises. (c) To advertise goods manufactured, produced, or for sale or service rendered, on the property upon which such advertising display is placed. SECTION 2.3 BUILDING LINE "Building Line" shall be established by the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2.4 FACE OF BUILDING. "Face of Building" shall mean the general outer surface not including cornices, bay windows, or other ornamental trim, of any main exterior wall of the building. SECTION 2.5 LIMITED ACCESS FREEWAY. II L i m i t ed Ac c e s s F re et~a y II sha 11 be deemed to mean a hi ghwa y to which the right of access to or from abutting lands is controlled anà restricted by the State of Texas or the City of North Richland Hills. Further, a "Limited Access Freeway" shall be bordered on each side by access roads (or right-of- way for access roads). "Limited ..ð..ccess Freeways" within the City of North Richland Hills are Interstate 820 and Airport Freeway (SH 121) only. SECTION 2.6 GROUND SIGN. "Ground Sign" shall mean a sign not wholly supported on a building on which has its main supporting structure depending up~n the ground for attachment. SECTION 2.7 PROJECTING SIGN. "Projecting Sign" shall mean a sign suspended from or supporteà from a building or structure and projecting out therefrom more than one (1) foot. SECTIO~ 2.8 ROOF SIGN. " Roo f S i g n" s h a 11 mea n any s i g n sup p 0 r t e d b y the roo f 0 f a building or placed above the apparent flat roof or eaves of a building as viewed from any elevation. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I II I I I I Ie I SECTION 2.9 SIGN. " 5 i g n ff s haIl mea n a d i s pIa y boa r d, s c r e en, s t r u c t u r e , object or part therof, used to announce, declare, demon- strate. display or otherwise advertise and attract the attention of the public to any business, service or product provided on the premises upon which sign is placed, other than: (a) Official notices authorized by a court, public body or public officer; and, (b) directional, warning or information signs authorized by federal, state or municipal authority. SECTION 2.10 TEMPORARY SIGN. "Temporary Sign" shall mean a sign, banner, pennant, flag or advertising display constructed of cloth, canvas, light fabric, cardboard, wallboard or other light material with or without frames intended to be displayed for a short period of time only. Trailer and portable signs are classified as " T e m p 0 r a r y S i g n s . " SECTION 2.11 WALL SIGN. "Wall Sign" shall mean any sign painted on, attached to or projecting from the wall surface of a building (including permanent window sign and signs on awnings and/or marquees). A wall sign shall not project above the apparent flat roof or eave line as viewed from all elevations, or more than one foot from the surface of the wall. SECTION 2.12 MARQUEE SIGN. " Mar que e S i g n" s h a 11 i n c 1 u d e any h 0 0 d 0 r awn i n g 0 r permanent construction projecting from the wall of a building or other structure. SECTION 2.13 DEVELOPMENT. "Development" shall mean any nonresidential property improvement or properties improved as a unit with a common parking area that is contiguous to the development. A shopping center under single or multiple ownership constitutes a development. SECTION 2.14 QUALIFIED STREET FRONTAGE. "Qualified Street Frontage" shall mean the width of property of a commercial or industrial developmellt which along the street, bears the address of the property. SECTION 2.15 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN. "Traffic Control Sign" shall be any sign used only to control and direct traffic on private property (e.g., "ENTER" I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I or "EXIT') without logo or advertising messages. SECTION 2.16 ZONING DISTRICT. "Zoning District" referred to in this Ordinance shall be as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, Ordinance Number 1080 and subsequent amendments. ARTICLE 3. SIGN PERMIT AND FEES SECTION 3.1 SIGN PERMIT REQUIRED. ( a ) No person shall erect, alter or add to a sign or sign structure, except as provided by this Ordinance and unless a permit for the same has been issued by the Building Official or other person he/she may authorize of the City. Where signs are illuminated by electric lighting, a separate electrical permit shall be obtained as required by the Electrical Code of The City. ( b ) No sign permit shall be issued for any additional signs or alterations to existing signs until all signs on the property or development conform to the provi- sions of this Ordinance. EXCEPTION: Temporary signs. SECTION 3.2 OFFICIAL, QUASI-OFFICIAL AND DIRECTIONAL SIGN. (a) Nothing herein contained shall prevent the erection, construction and maintenance of official traffic, fire and police signs, signals, devices and markings of the State, City or other appropriate governmental authorities, nor the posting of notices required by law. Private and quasi-public signs shall be prohibited upon public property unless authorized by the City of North Richland Hills or other appropriate governmental authorities. (b) Legal notices, telephone and other underground utility warning signs, not exceeding one (1) square foot in size and other safety signs may be erected without a permit being issued. (c) Nonadvertising, directional or informational signs less than six (6) square feet in area may be used without a permit in zoning districts R-7-MF, 0-1, LR, C, I and PD as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland Hills. I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I SECTIO~ 3.3 APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT. Application for sign permit shall be made to the Building Department accompanied by the filing fee in the amount provided for by Section 3.8 for each development on which the sign or signs are to be erected and shall contain or have attached thereto the following information: (a) Name, address and telephone number of the applicant; (b) Location of building, structure or lot to which or upon which the sign or advertising structure is to be attached or erected; (c) Position of the sign or advertising structure in relation to nearby buildings or structures; (d) Two (2) blueprints or ink drawings of the plans and specifications and method of construction and attachment to the buildings or in the ground; (e) Copy of stress sheets and calculations showing the structures are designed for deadload and wind pressure in any direction in the amount required by this and all other laws and ordinances of the City. The Build- ing Code of the City, which is the current edition of the Uniform Building Code, shall apply for design of any sign structure; (f) Name of person, firm, corporation or association erecting structure or painting the sign; (g) Written consent of the owner of the building, structure or land to which or on which the structure is to be erected or sign to be painted. (h) Any electrical permit required and issued for such sign; (i) Estimated sign value; (j) Detailed plans of all existing signs, including photos and/or other pertinent data which will aid in the determination of the sites conformance with this Ordinance; (k) Such other information as the BUilding Official shall require to show full compliance with this and all other laws and ordinances of the City; (1) In addition to the filing fee, a sign permit fee shall be collected in accordance with the schedule of Section 3.8. SECTION 3.4 NONCONFORMING SIGNS. All applications for sign permits for signs which do not I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I conform to the provisions of this Ordinance or are located on the same property or development on which other signs do not conform with the provisions of this Ordinance shall be submitted by the Building Official to the Director of Planning and Development for review in accordance with the provisions of Article 10 of this Ordinance. SECTION 3.5 APPROVAL OF TRAFFICE ENGINEER. If in the opinion of the Building Official the plans and specifications indicate that the sign or sign structure might interfere with, mislead or confuse traffic, or in any place where a ground sign is to be placed on a corner lot, then the applicant shall submit a traffic engineer certification with the application. SECTION 3.6 ISSUANCE OF PERMITS. If it shall appear the proposed sign structure is in compliance with all the requirements of this Ordinance anà all other laws and Ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills and has received approval where necessary, the Building Department shall then issue the sign permit. If the work authorized under a sign permit has not been completed within ninety (90) days or a proper extension granted thereto after date of issuance, the said permit shall become null and void. Issuance of the sign permit shall be conditioned upon the applicant's acceptance of any conditions imposed thereon by the City. No sign permit issued with conditions shall be valid until all conditions have been complied with by the applicant. SECTION 3.7 U~SAFE AND UNLAWFUL SIGNS. (a) Signs and sign structures including those existing prior to this Ordinance shall be maintained at all times in a state of good repair, safe and secure with all braces, bolts, slips, supporting frame and fastenings free from deterior- ation, termite infestation, rot, rust or loosening, able to withstand at all times the wind pressure for which they were originally designed. (b) No person maintaining any sign, sign structure or billboard shall fail to keep the ground space within eight (8) feet from the base of the saià sign, signboard, billboard or advertising structure free and clear of weeds, rubbish and other flammable waste material. (c) If the Building Official or other person he/she may appoint shall find that any sign or other advertising structure regulated herein as unsafe or insecure, or as a menace to the public, or has been constructed or erected or is being maintained in violation of the provisions of this section, the permittee or owner thereof shall be given written notice. If the permittee or owner fails to remove or alter the structure so as to comply with the standards herein set forth within thirty (30) days after such notice, I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I such sign or advertising structure may be removed or altered to comply by the City of North Richland Hills at the expense of the permittee or owner of the property upon which it is located. The Bllilding Official shall refuse to issue any subsequent building, electrical, plumbing or mechanical permits for the property on which the offending sign was located if any owner or permittee shall refuse to pay costs so assessed. The Building Official may cause any sign or other advertising structure which is an immediate peril to persons or property to be removed by giving at least forty-eight (48) hours notice. (d) The Building Official or other person he/she may appoint may cause any illegal temporary sign, including flags, pennants, banners and temporary window signs to be removed within a twenty-four (24) hour period. EXCEPTION: The American and Texas flags may be flown at any time without a permit. SECTION 3.8 FILING AND PERMIT FEES. (a) Permanent signs and billboards: application and plan review fees shall be $50.00 for permanant signs and billboards. Sign permit fees shall be based on the value of the sign in accoràance with the follot~ing: Monetary Value of Proposed Work Base Fee + Percentage of Estimated Cost 00 - 501 - 1,501 - 3,001 - 5,001 50,001 - 100,001 500,001 500 1,500 3,000 5,000 50,000 100,000 500,000 or more $ 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 0.00 + 70/ · /0 50.00 · 6 ~ó 150.00 + 50" · '0 650.00 + · 4 9¡) ( b ) Temporary Signs: a single filing/permit fee of: 1st sign 2nd sign 3rd sign $ 25.00 20.00 15.00 ARTICLE 4. AREA OF SIGN PERMITTED SECTION 4.1 SIGNS: COMMERCIAL i\ND INDUSTRIAL. (a) For signing purposes, frontage on private streets that serve as public thoroughfares and not just driveways may, I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I with City Council approval, be considered as qualified street frontage. (b) Anyone (1) development may have a choice of, but not more than, one (1) ground sign, one (1) roof sign or one (1) projecting sign, subject to the exceptions contained in Section 4.2 through 4.8. In the case of very large develop- ments (e.g., shopping centers, apartment complexes, etc.) that have substantial frontages on two or more streets (with commercial or industrial zoning on both sides of the streets), additional ground signs may be permitted with special approval from the City Council. SECTION 4.2 GROUND SIGNS. Ground signs are subject to the following provisions: (a) One (1) ground or pole sign may be permitted for each 300 linear feet of qualified street frontage with each development in all zoning districts except AG and all of the R districts. (b) The total area of sign permitted for a ground sign shall be measured as one (1) square foot of area of sign for each linear foot of street frontage, to a maximum area of sign of 300 square feet for anyone sign. (c) The maximum height of any ground sign and its support- ing structure shall be twenty-five (25) feet, except that the height of a ground sign may be increased by adding one (1) foot of height for each linear foot the sign is back from the adjacent property lines, not to exceed a maximum height of fifty (50) feet to the top of the sign. Cd) The height of any ground sign may not exceed one-half (1/2) the shortest linear distance from the location of the sign to the nearest boundary of any AG or R zoning districts. (e) The sign shall not project over the property line of the àevelopment, right-of-way or over any area within ten (10) feet of the curb of a public street or thoroughfare. (f) A minimum qualified frontage of 100 feet shall be required to erect a ground sign. (g) Permanent attachment to the ground shall be required for all ground signs. SECTION 4.3 ROOF SIGNS. Roof signs permitted are subject to the following provisions: (a) One (1) roof sign may be permitted with each develop- I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ment on all zoning districts except AG and R districts. (b) Roof sign shall not project over the edge of the roof or eave. (c) The maximum permitted area of roof signing shall be one (1) square foot of sign area for each linear foot of property frontage not to exceed a maximum of 100 square feet. (d) The height of a roof sign shall not exceed ten (10) feet above the apparent flat roof or eave line. (e) Roof sign supports should be architecturally attractive or screened from view. SECTION 4.4 PROJECTING SIGNS. Projecting signs permitted are subject to the following provisions. (a) One (1) projecting sign may be permitted with each development in all zoning districts except AG and R districts. (b) Projecting signs shall not project over the property line of the development, right-of-way or over any area within ten (10) feet of the curb of a public street or thoroughfare. (c) Projection of sign shall not extend more than four (4) feet from any wall facing. (d) The total permitted area of a projecting sign shall be measured as one (1) square foot of sign area for each linear foot of property frontage not to exceed a maximum of 100 square feet. SECTION 4.5 THEATER MARQUEES. Theater marquees need not be limited to projecting sign criteria. but shall be subjected to individual approval by the City Council. SECTION 4.6 WALL SIGNS: COMMERCIAL ZONES. Wall signs shall be permitted in commercial or industrial zoning district development provided the total area of all wall signs on anyone (1) wall face shall not exceed twenty five (25%) percent of the total wall area also to include valance and permanent window signs. A wall sign shall not project above the apparent flat roof or eave line. SECTION 4.7 SIGNS: RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL ZONES. All signs are prohibited in AG and all R zoning districts except as follows: I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (a) Multi-family developments in R-7-MF zoning àistricts shall be allowed one (1) wall or ground sign for identification purposes only for each street frontage. The area of such signs shall not exceed one (1) square foot per residential unit, or thirty-two (32) square feet, whichever is least. Ground signs in R-7-~F zoning districts shall not exceed a height of four (4) feet above grade. A permit is required for these signs. (b) Wall signs may be used with any residential use in AG and all R zoning districts with exception of R-7-MF, with a maximum area of sign of two (2) square feet per sign with a limit of two (2) signs for anyone (1) occupancy, and may be erected without a permit being issued. (c) In AG zoning districts, legitimate agricultural busïnesses or enterprises shall be permitted ground, roof, projecting or wall signs in accordance with the restrictions of Sections 4.2, 4.3. 4.4 anà 4.6 except that the total area of all signs shall not exceed 100 square feet and the height of any ground sign shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet above grade. A permit is required for all these signs. SECTION 4.8 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIG~S. (a) The maximum area of anyone traffic control sign shall be two (2) square feet. (b) Traffic control signs are not permitted in AG and all R zoning districts with exception of the R-7-MF district. {c} Traffic control signs shall not include any advertis- ing or attention attracting lighting, symbols, logos or shapes. (d) Traffic control signs may pertain to either vehicular or pedestrian traffic. ARTICLE 5. GE~ERAL PROVISIOXS SECTION 5.1 INTERFERE~CE WITH BUILDIXG REGULATIO~S. No sign shall be erected in such a manner that any portion of its surface or supports will interfere in anyway with the free use of any fire escape, exit, stanàpipe, or windows or obstruct any required ventilator or door stairway. SECTION 5.2 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. (a) Xo sign permit shall be issued for any sign or billboard which encroaches upon or over any City owned or I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I controlled property unless an encroachment permit therefor is obtained from the City Councilor State agency in charge. (b) No encroachment permit for any sign or billboard shall be issued unless in the opinion of the Building Official the erection and maintenance of said sign shall not imperil the health, safety and ~\Telfare of the public. Any such permit may be issued subject to such conditions as the City Council. deems to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the public. SECTION 5.3 PROJECTION OVER PRIVATE PROPERTY. No sign may project more than six (6) inches from the face of a building over private property used or intended to be used by the general public, unless there is a minimum of eight (8) feet clearance from the bottom of the sign to sidewalk ~r grade immediately below the sign, or a minimum of fourteen (14) feet clearance from the bottom of the sign to a vehicular trafficway immediately below the sign. SEe T ION 5. 4 ~1 E ~1 0 R I A L S I G N S A ~ D HIS TOR I C A L TAB LET S . Nothing herein contained shall prevent the City Council from granting special permits on such terms as it may deem proper, for signs advertising or pertaining to any civic, patriotic or special event of general public interest taking place within the boundaries of the City. when it is determined that the same will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare. interest or safety, nor injurious to adjacent property or improvements. SECTION 5.6 LIGHTING. (a) Signs may be illuminated or nonilluminated. Illumination may be either by internal, internal-indirect or indirect lighting as defined in (b), (c) and (d). Lighting shall be so installed as to avoid any glare or reflection into adjacent property, or onto a street or alley to create a traffic hazard. When not necessary for security, it is suggested that lighting be turned off as soon after business hours as is reasonable, especially for signs in close proximity to residential areas. (b) ftInternal Lighting" means a source of illumination entirely within the sign which makes the contents of the sign visible at night by means of the light being transmitted through a translucent material but wherein the source of the illumination is not visible. ( c ) " I n t ern a] - I n d ire c t L i g h tin g" mea n s a sou r ceo f illumination entirely within the sign (generally a free standing letter) which makes the sign visible at night by means of lighting the background upon which the free standing character is mounted. The character itself shall be opaque, and thus will be silhouetted against the background. The source of illumination shall not be visible. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (d) "Indirect Lighting" means a source of external illumination located a distance away from the sign, which lights the sign, but which itself is not visible to persons viewing the sign from any normal position of view. SECTION 5.7 ROTATING, MOVING, FLASHING, CHANGING OR BLINKING SIGNS. Rotating, moving, flashing, changing or blinking signs shall not be permitted. However, "message signs" (for example: time and temperature, etc.) may be permitted as approved on an individual basis be the City Council, giving adequate consideration to traffic safety hazards posed by the size and location of the proposed sign. ARTICLE 6. TEMPORARY SIGNS SECTION 6.1 TEMPORARY SIGNS. Excpt as otherwise provided in this Ordjnance: (a) No person may erect a temporary sign as defined in Section 2.10 without a permit obtained from the Building Department. (b) No temporary or portable sign shall be erected or placed to advertise a business, industry or pursuit except on the premises on which the business, industry or pursuit is conducted. (c) No temporary or portable sign shall be erected or placed on any public property or right-of-way, utility pole, light pole, or traffic control sign or pole. (d) No temporary sign shall be displayed for more than thirty (30) days per permit received. (e) A maximum of three (3) temporary sign permits per year shall be issued to anyone business, industry or pursuit. (f) Temporary signs shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet in area. (g) No temporary or portable sign shall be erected or placed within fifteen (15) feet of the curb or street except for those which may be mounted on the wall of a building which is closer than fifteen (15) feet to the curb or street. (h) ~o temporary or portable sign may be erected or placed in any location that constitutes a safety or traffic hazard. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (i) No temporary or portable sign may be erecteà or placed in a parking space. (j) Non-conforming temporary signs or temporary signs with- out permits may be impounded by the City forty-eight hours after notice is given to the owner or party responsible for the sign. (k) Each temporary sign may not advertise more than one business unless each business that advertises pays for a permit and counts as one of the three allowed per year as stated in Subsection (e). (1) Trailer and portable sign companies shall bear in letters of not less than one (1) inch in height the company name and telephone number on each unit. These must be current or they will be classified as non~conforming signs and subject to Subsection (i). SECTION 6.2 REAL ESTATE SIGNS. Permits shall not be requred for the following types of real estate signs: (a) One (1) temporary sign announcing the offering for sale or rental of induviàually platted residential or commercial property on which it is placed shall he allowed in any dis- trict anà may be placed in any yard. Such sign shall not exceed five (5) square feet in area: it shall be removed within one (1) week following the close of sale or lease. (b) On nonresidential commercial property where there is a business building, one (1) temporary unlighted sign offering all or a portion of the same for sale or rental shall be allowed flat against any wall of the business building. Such sign shall be no taller than the wall and shall have an area no larger than 100 square feet. Such sign shall be removed within one (1) week following the close of sale or lease. (c) On undeveloped property, temporary unlighted signs offering the same for sale or lease shall be allowed. Such signs shall be located at least twenty-five (25) feet behind any curb or ten (10) feet behind any property line, whichever greater; and shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. The total area of all sign message surfaces of all such signs shall not exceed one (1) square foot per one (1) lineal foot of street frontage of the property for sale or 100 square feet on each street fronting such property; whichever is smaller. Only one (1) sign per street frontage shall be permitted. Each sign shall be removed within one (1) week following the close of the sale or lease. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I SECTION 6.3 WEEKEND BUILDERS ADVERTISING. (CITY ORDINANCE ~O. 1418) The City of North Richland Hills' Policy for Weekend Advertising, as expressed in this Ordinance, is extended to homebuilders for the purpose of guiding the weekend motoring public to available residential properties. The policy is intended as a benefit also to the buying public. These provisions are designed to allow temporary directional signs without resulting in an excess that may prove offensive to others of the public. The policy should serve also as "common sense" guidelines in places where direct application is unclear. (1) Schedule: Signs will be allowed between 12PM Friday and 12PM Monday. A holiday falling on Friday or Monday will be considered part of the weekend. ( 2) S i g n S i z e: S i g n s s h a 11 not e xc e e d 2 4" b y 3 0" ins i z e , not be installed more than 3 feet above grade. (3) Spacing of Signs: A minimum of 30 feet must be held between all signs, and signs for anyone advertiser must be at least 200 feet apart. (4) Sign Location: "a" ~ot closer than 40 feet to a street intersection or median opening. "b" Not closer than 3 feet from the edge of the sign to the street curb (or edge of pavement). Signs should not encroach either the sidewalks or street. "c" Not in a motorist "visibility triangle". Generally, if a sign is close to blocking motorist visiblility, it should be moved (see "a" above). "d" ~ot more than 3 miles from the subject property. (5) Signs should be rigid, 2 dimensional displays that a d v e r tis e new res ide n t i alp rap e r t y, "f 0 r s a Ie" 0 n 1 y (not lease property), guiding the motorist to a specific location in Xorth Richland Hills. These are the guidelines under which this policy will be administered, relating particularly to the weekend/motoringj home-buying customer. It is the responsibility of the builder to secure permission of the adjacent property owner for placement of the signs on private property. This policy does not grant unlimited access and use of the City right-of-way. Violations of this policy will be cause for confiscating the signs, and excessive violations may require that the policy be suspended for a period of time. The Building Official shall notjfy the City Council in the event that the suspension of this policy is put into effect indicatin~ the I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I causes and the period of the suspension. All builders are offered the use of this policy equally. In so doing, we ask that you help us maintain a neat and orderly appearance throughout all of North Richland Hills. SECTION 6.4 SUBDIVISION/NEW DEVELOPMENT SIGNS. (a) These signs are used for identification of a new project, such as a subdivision, where real property is being sold for the first time to a user, new buildings, public projects and the like. These signs are not permanent but may be required for a longer period of time than most temporary signs. In no event shall there be more than one on-site sign which for a project located on property owned by the adver- tiser in the same zoning district and one off-site sign to be located in any zoning districts with exception of AG and all R districts. Such signs shall be removed at the end of one year or c~mpletion of the project, whichever comes first. An extension to the one year limitation may be granted by the Building Official and a renewal fee equal to the permit fee is paid and one of the following requirements are met: (1) a substantial portion of the development is not yet completed, (2) if the development has building activity in progress, (3) if the sign is relocated to a portion of the develop- ment which is not offensive to the completed portions of the development. These signs shall not exceed 15 feet in height and 150 square feet in area. They shall be located at least 25 feet behind the curb of any street, outside any visibility triangle. (b) A sign permit is required for subdivision or new development signs erected or placed in accordance with the provisions of Section 6.3(a). SECTION 6.5 TRADE CONSTRUCTION SIGNS. Trade construction signs may be approved at the discretion of the Building Official to advertise the various construc- tion trades on any construction site. Trade construction signs shall be removed before a certificate of occupancy is issued. They shall be in accordance with Section 6.3. SECTION 6.6 POLITICAL SIG~S. Temporary, unlighted political signs (including portable or trailer signs) supporting an announced candidate, a party or an issue shall be allowed in any district without a sign permit, subject to the following: I Ie I I I I I. I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (a) Political signs shall be located only on private property with the permission of the owner. Political signs shall not be permitted on any public property or right-of-way, nor on any utility, light, traffic signal or sign poles. (b) Political signs are permitted for a period of thirty (30) days prior to local or county elections, sixty (60) days prior to a state election, and ninety (90) days prior to a national election. All political signs shall be removed not later than seven (7) days after the election or after the termination of candidacy, whichever occurs first. (c) In AG and all R zoning districts, political signs shall not have a height of more than three (3) feet above grade. In other zoning districts, the height shall not exc~ed six (6) feet above grade. (d) In AG and all R zoning districts, political signs shall not exceed five (5) square feet in area. In other zoning districts, the area shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet. (e) In all zoning districts, political signs shall be located no closer than ten (10) feet to the street or curb and shall not be located to cause a safety or traffic hazard. SECTION 6.7 CIVIC AND RELIGIOUS SIGNS. (a) Temporary signs advertising the civic or religious events of civic and religious organizations may be erected or placed on their property after obtaining a permit from the Building Department at no cost. A maximum of two permits may be issued at anyone time. (b) Temporary signs advertising the civic or religious events of civic and religious organizations may be erected or placed on private property with the written permission of the owner and pay for a permit from the Building Department and are subject to Section 6.1 (c) Signs announcing civic or religious events of wide- spread community interest may be erected on public property or right-of-way with special permission from the City Council if they do not create a traffic hazard and obtain a permit without cost from the Building Department. ARTICLE 7. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION The construction of all signs shall comply to structural requirements of the City of North Richland Hills Building I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Code, and also the current edition of the Uniform Building Code adopted by the City. The design shall be related to the type of supports and shall be in harmony with surroundings. ARTICLE 8. BILLBOARDS SECTION 8.1 APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL. (a) No billboard may be constructed unless a sign permit therefor has been issued with the approval of the City Council. (b) In ~aking its determination, the City Council shall consider, among other factors, whether or not issuance of the permit. (1) Will be materially detrimental to the public welfare; (2) Will substantially interfere with the orderly develop- ment of the City as provided for in the Official Land Use Plan; (3) Will be compatible with the development of property of other persons located in the vicinity thereof; (4) Will comply with the provisions of this Ordinance. (c) Applications therefor shall be filed and processed as provided for in Article 3 of this Ordinance. SECTION 8.2 ZONING. A billboard may be placed only adjacent to a limited access freeway as defineà in Section 2.5, in zoning districts except AG and all R districts. SECTION 8.3 MAXIMUM AREA. (a) No singlefaced billboard shall be larger than 700 square feet in area. (b) No one face of a double-faced or V-shaped billboard shall exceed 700 square feet in area. SECTION 8.4 MAXIMUM HEIGHT. The maximum height of billboards shall be fifty (50) feet measured from the ground to the overall top. Approval for taller billboards may be granted by the City Council in those cases where it will reduce clutter and fit in more compatibly with the surrounding terrain and structures. No billboard shall be located on the roof or wall of a bUjlding. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I SECTION 8.5 BILLBOARD LOCATION AND POSIT lOX. (a) Billboards shall be erected only on private property and shall not project over any public property or right -of-way. Billboards shall be located within 100 feet of the limited access freeway boundary line. (b) Billboards shall be positioned such that the primary viewing angle is from the freeway. SECTION 8.6 BILLBOARDS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL AREAS. (a) The closest projecting point of a billboard shall not be located closer than 100 feet from a residential district boundary or property line. (b) The closest projecting point of a billboard shall not be 'located closer than 100 feet from the property line of any public recreation area, public or parochial school, public library or church. SECTION 8.7 STRUCTURE. (a) From the effective date of this Ordinance, all new billboards shall be of single post construction. (b) All billboards shall comply structurally to the City's Building Code. SECTION 8.8 MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BILLBOARDS. A minimum distance of 1760 feet shall be maintained between any two (2) billboaràs located on the same side of the freeway. SECTION 8.9 ILLUMINATION. (a) Any illumination used on a billboard shall be of an indirect type and shall not face toward any residential building. (b) No flashing or intermittent lights shall be used to illuminate a billboard. ARTICLE 9. OBNOXIOUS SIGNS EXPLOITING SEX PROHIBITED S E C T ION H. 1 V I SUA L D E PIC T ION 0 F SEX U A L ARE A S 0 F H 1J 1\1 AN FOR 1\1 PROHIBITED. No sign or signs as defined in this Ordinance, to include any temporary sign, which in whole or in part, depicts the human form in such a manner that the areas of the buttocks, or the genitals, or the pubic area, or any portion of the female breast below the top of the nipple, are depicted as I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I not covered with opaque clothing shall be maintained, erected, or placed upon or adjacent to the outside of any building where it is visible from public streets or from adjacent buildings or premises. SECTION 9.2 USE OF WORDS CONNOTATING EROTIC ENTERTAINMENT PROHIBITED. No sign or signs as defined in this Ordinance, to include ~ny temporary signs, which in whole or part advertise any "topless," "bottomless," "naked," or words of like import, except that the words "adult entertainment" or "adult shows" will be permissible, shall be maintained, erected, or placed upon or adjacent to the outside of any building where it is visible from public streets or from adjacent buildings or premises. SECTION 9.3 DISPLAY OF OFFENSIVE SIGNS A PUBLIC NUISANCE. Any sign which is in violation of Sections 9.1 and 9.2 is declared a public nuisance. SECTION 9.4 ABATEMENT. (a) Any temporary sign or signs in violation of this Article shall be abated within twenty-four (24) hours after notice has been given in writing to abate the sign or signs. Any sign which involves letters placed on a marquee is considered a temporary sign for purposes of this Article. (b) Any sign or signs in violation of this Article which can be covered or painteà over in such a manner so the sign will comply with this Article and which do not require removal or mechanical or electrical alterations of the whole or part of the sign shall be covered or painted within seventy-two (72) hours after written notice has been given in writing to abate the sign or signs. (c) Signs in violation of this Article which require mechanical or electrical alteration of all or part of the sign or require the removal of part or all of the sign in order to comply with this Article shall be altered or removed within seven (7) days after service of written notice to abate the sign or signs. SECTION 9.5 NOTICE TO ABATE. (a) The City Manager or the Building Official or one of their designee are authorized to prepare and deliver notice to abate any sign or signs in violation of this Article. (b) Notice is deemed served for the purpose of this Article if delivered to any person who is an owner or lessee of the premises on which the sign or signs are located or I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I Ie I to any officer of any corporatjon or any partner of a partnership which is operating a business on the premises on which the sign or signs are Jocated Wllich violates this Article and which is responsible for the sign or signs in violation of this Article. SECTION 9.6 VIOLATION A MISDEMEANOR. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that any person, firm or corporation which shall violate any provision of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction may be punished by fine of not less than Fifty ($50.00) Dollars nor more than One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dollars, and each day such violation occurs shall be deemed a separate offense. ARTICLE 10. ENFORCEMENT SECTION 10.1 ENFORCEMENT. It shall be the duty of the Building Official to enforce the provisions of this Ordinance. The Chief of Police and all officers charged with the enforcement of the law shall assist the Building Official. SECTION 10.2 RIGHT OF ENTRY. Upon presentation of proper credentials, the Building Official or hjs duly authorized representative may enter at reasonable times, any buildings, structure or premises in the City to perform any duties imposed upon him by this Ordinance. SECTION 10.3 ABATEMENT OF NONCONFORMING SIGN. (a) A period of ten (10) years subsequent to January 24, 1983 is hereby established for the abatement of signs legally existing prior to said date but which signs become nonconforming as a result of regulations contained herein. This provision applies to signs otherwise established. Illegally erected signs are subject to immediate abatement. (b) Nonconforming painted wall signs are subject, in addition to the abatement procedures set forth, to immediate abatement when the business occupying the premises changes to a different business or different owner necessitating repainting of the signs. (c) Abatement periods established herein are subject to appeal before the City Council. I ~ I I I I I I I . I 'I I I I I I Ie I ARTICLE 11. SECTION 11.1 SAVINGS CLAUSE. If any portion of this Ordinance is held to be invalid by any Court of competent jurisdiction it shall not affect the remaining valid portion. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I City of j\8rth Richland Hills~ Texas ; '~ \ ' \ January 8, 1987 REF: ACMM 0125-87 Memo to: Mayor & City Council From: Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager Street Assessment Policy Subject: The City of Arlington recently adopted a revised street assessment policy. The new policy relieves owner occupied single family residents from any street assessment until such time as: (1) The property is platted or replatted (2) An application is made for a building permit (3) Access to the improved roadway is requested (4) A change in Zoning is approved by the City Council (5) A change in ownership of the property occurs We are not proposing any changes to our policy at this time. However, we submit the Arlington changes to you for future discussion. No action is necessary and the attached Arlington policy is submitted to you for your information only. DH/9~ ~ Attachment (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 ~\j'^' . I" ~,~ .1Ì1,ör!'Jal Report to Mayor and City Council Subject REVISION OF 1986 STREET ASSESSMENT POLICY I. I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I I I II - '1-- d b Date No. 10/30/86 BACKGROUND: On October 28, 1986, the Property Management Division submitted to the City Council a proposed change in the City of Arlington's 1984 Street Assessment Policy. These changes are relative to single-family and agricultural zoned property. DISCUSSION: The City Council requested a revision in the language dictating when street assessments for owner occupied property may become due. The Property .Management Division has amended the proposed 1986 Street Assessment Policy reflecting those changes by the addition of Section of F.2C which states: Provided, however, nothing herein shall require said assessments to be payable when an application for a building permit is made for the following purposes: 1. 2. 3. 4. adding to an existing-building or structure; altering an existing building or structure; adding an accessory building or structure; restoring any building or structure previously destroyed where the extent of the destruction is not more than fifty percent (50%) of its reasonable market value by fire, explosion, or any other casualty or act of God; or any other change in the property is made which would not constitute a change in its use as owner-occupied property zoned for agriculture ("An) or single-family detached (fiR" and "R-1"). s. CONCLUSION: The Property Management Division recommends that the City Council approve the amended 1986 Street Assessment Policy. Respectfully submitted, 4~KJ; James Kelly, Right-of-Way Agent Ism cc: Street Assessment Policy File attachments I' ./~ ~ ~ .,' :~. I' í I I I I I I M I I· I I I I I If! I c. CITY OF ~RLINGTO~'S 1986 STREET ASSESSMEK! POLICY The policy for street paving assessments in the City of hrlington, 7exas, shall be as follows: h. Purpose This assessment policy shall constitute a guide only for the assessment of properties for street and side,,;alk construction, and nothing herein shall be construed as a limitation upon the City of Arlington to assess for such impro\-E:IT,ents in any p.::.rticul ar project ""here, in the opinior: of the City Council, such project should be assE:£seê in a different manner as may be allowed by law. E. I rrlprO'V E:;:;:= r! t s StreE:ts shël~ contain a paved section with curbs to the dimE:nsic~E a~ã specificëtions as provided in the Subdi- visio~s Reles and Regulations of the City of Arlington. J-.~SE:E=: ::-.-. :-c.lic\· The p~c?erty owners abutting each side of a street shall be assessee on a front foot basis not to exceed the foIl 0'.:: :'". = : 1 . J::' ~;-=-: ': percent (90~) of all costs of improvements rf:¿~:~Ç to the paving of one-half (~) of a street at~~~~~g the property. 2. OnE: hundred percent (100%) of all costs of improve- ments related to curbs and gutters. 3. . One hundreà percen~ (100%) of all costs ~E~~£ r~12te¿ to sióewalks. improve- of ~ . 'I:-.~ -:~:.~ I'CCS-C~I', as useè herein, is a comprehen- s:.':-:. -CE::"!". in~l1;:::':r.~ but not limiteè to such things as E::·:::êvõ'tlcr. 2.:mE: stabilizeò base, asphalt c.::' :lr,ç, a spha:':. S1;::-! ac ing , concrete sur facing and ençi~eering COSts. I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I- I . :/ D. Ja.£SE~sn·Er~t RatE E. The assessment rate shall be determined by dividing the total assessable costs, as proviãeè b~1 the Enqin~er' s Estimate, by the front foot meésurernents of all abutting properties. The above methoè rnay be useë regardless of depth and shape of lot and any peculiar characteristics thereof, subject, ho~ever, to a finding by the City Council of inequality anå injustice which may require certain adjustment.s. Adjustments In aãòOition to any other findings by the City Council deter~iniDg whethe~ inequality or injustice shall exist in any ~articulãr case, the follo~ing rules are applica- ble: la. Abutting properties zoned uR", "R-l", 'IR-I-Z", "A" or "~Ef1 shall not be ê~sesseè for strEet pa\ring (inclu¿ing curbs anè 9~tters) an amou~t grEater than the &ctual construction cost of one-tal! (~) of a tw~nty-eight foot (28') street, plus six percent (6t) for engineering services. lb. Abutting properties zoned "D", "T", "PD", "1-...-1.., "A-2", "A-3" or "A-4ft shall not be assE:ssed for street paving (including curbs anè 9u~te~s) an amount greater than the actual co~structi2~ co~t of one-half (~) of a thirt~'-eight foo:' (3E') Street, plus six percent (6%) for engineerinç s~rviceE. Ie. Abutting properties zoneè "PB'I, "0", ilL?", 'tLE·" , II B", " B-1 ", II C P ", " IN", It L L R " 0 r II N\\~ " s rl ê: :. 1 T.1 0 t be assessed for street paving (incluãing curbs and gutters) an amount greater than the actual con- struction cost of one-half (~) of a forty-four foot (44') concrete street, whichever i5 tCI be con- structeè, plus six perc~nt (6~) fo= ~nsineerin9 services. 2. In the event an applicêtic·r. c·: thE- IIE:--·~c.~E :foo~" rule, as set out ir. Sectic·r. ~.03ë 0: t!-;: Süb¿i\1i- sian Chapter of the Coóe of the City of h~lin9tcn, results in a lesser assessme~t than that covered in the i~ediately preceèing pa=a?raph 1 hereof, then such lesser amount shall be assessed such abutting property. ( 2) I. ~. I. V I I 1 I I I R I I I I 1 I I I- I / 3. In the event an appl ication of the II sever. cent" rul~, as set out in Sectio~ 3.03e of the Subdivi- sion Chapter of the Code of the City of Arlinçton, results in a lesser assessment than that covered in the irr~ediately preceding paragraphs 2 and 1 hereof, then such lesser amount shall be assesseå such abutting property. 4. In any event, for owner-occupied "R", nR-l", "R-I-Z" and "T" zoned property used for residential purposes, the assessment shall not exceeå $22.00 per front foot. F. Assessment Methods 1 · . Standõrd ~ethoà of Pa~1rnent The cost asses~ed against said o,,",ners and their property shall be payõble in anr¿ual installrnents 0: ten (10) in nurr,ber, the first of whicr. ~hall be payable within thirty (30) days from the èate of cor.¡pletion of S2 id improvements and their acceF- tance bj? the City of Arlington, õnè one (1) irj- ~tôllment each year thereafter until paid, together with interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%), with the provision that any of said install- IT,ents may be paid at any time before JT,aturi ty by the payment of the principal and accrued interest thereon. Any property owner against whom and against whose property an assessment has been levied may pay the whole assessment chargeable to him without interest within thirty (30) days after the acceptance and completion of said improvements. r· Optional Payment Deferment Contract A. Payment of the total cost assessed against improved properties zoned for agriculture ("A") or single-famil}? detached ("R" and "R-l") uses may, upon execution 0: a Payment Deferment Contract, be deferreã until such tirnt as anyone of the following Occurs: , .¿ . The- property or an:y portion thereof is plõtteà or replatted; 2. An application is made for a building permit on any portion of the property; (3) I·: · I. I I I I I I I II I I I I I I ~- I I ./ . ;' B. c. 3. A change in zoning on the property or any portio~ thereof is approved by the City Council; or 4. A change in ownership of the property or any portion thereof occurs. The assessments shall be payable in annual installments of ten (10) in number, the first of which shall be pa}"able within thirty (30) days from the date that one of the events mentioned above has occurred, and one (1) installment each year thereafter until paid, together with interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8 %), wi th the pro~7i s ion that any of said installrrlents Irla}' be paid at any time before Ir,aturity b)~ the pë}rrr.ent of the principal anå accrueè interest tl¡ereon. Any property owner aqainst whom and against whose property an aSSEssment has been levied may pay the whole êssess~ent chargeable to him without interest ,,"ithir¿ thirtj-" (30) èa~'s after the aSSEEsrnent iE payable. Provided, however, nothing herein shall require sëiè êssessments tc be payable when an applicatic~ for a building permit is made for the follo~ing purpOSts: 1. aàëing tc a~ existing building or struc- tur€i 2. altE:!'i~Jc ër: e>:istir;ç builàing or struc- turf=; 3. adë inç ar:. structure; building accessory or 4. restorinq an}" builãing or structure previously destroyed where the extent of tr!E ëE-~tructiC'r_ ~ s nc~ mú:-e than f i ftJ- perce~t (SOt) c: ~tE reasonëble market '\- a 1 U E 1:~ } - fir E. , E: ): F :. c' £ i 0 r. , 0 =-- a n ~. 0 the r C ê. E ~ ~ :. 't ~ " c ~ a c -: c -: G c· =; 0 r 5 · an~Y othe:- chan9€ ire trle prop€rt~· is made which woulã not consti tute a cÌlange in its use as owner-occupied property zoned for aç¡riculturE (lip.") or single-faJnil~" detached (nR'1 and "R-11'). ( ~ ) 1-: -, . "" ,... I. D. 1 I I 1 I I I II I I I I I I I I- I A property O\Imer shall, withir. fifteen (15) days of the time such assessment is levied, exercise this Optional Payment Deferment Contract. Shoulà the property owner not exercise said option within the time pre- scribed, then payment shall be made pursuant to the Standard Method Pa}~ent as described in F.l. above. (5) ~~~'-Slall Report to Mayor ana City ë~u~/t I I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I - O"g.nallng 1!." M Mull- C P A - I..... Department f1tëttren. 111S,... , Asst. Director of Utilities Fin For Add'honallnformatlon Janes Kelly, Contac t Right-of-Way Agent I Date 10/16/86 [?ev,'sJ Reference Number SubJect. Revision of Street Assessrænt J\'">licies INTRCDUCTICN : The City Council directed the Property Managerænt Division to revise the current street assessrcent policies which would accœm:x1ate existing agricultural or single family detached residential uses by providing that no assessrænt would have to be pëiid until such tine as saTe change takes place in regard to the use of the property. DISCUSSICN: The Property Managerænt Division, after careful review, has developed an assessrænt pol~cy in regards to or,mer-occupied property zoned for single-family detached uses ("R" and "R1")and agricultural ("A") uses. The current policy would continue to apply to all other properties. We propose that the follOYling policies be considered for iIrpleræntation. Assessrænt Mathods The total cost assessed against or,mer-occupied properties zoned for agriculture ("An) or single-family detached ("R" and "RI") uses shall not be pëiyable until such tiIœ as anyone of the fOllC7ÑÏng occurs: a. The property is platted or replatted, an application is made for a building pennit, access to the iIrproved roadway is requested, a change in zoning is approved by the City Council, or a change in or,mership of the property occurs. b. c. d. e. The assessrcents shall be payable in annual instal1lœnts of ten (10) in number, the first of which shall be pëiyable within thirty (30) days fran the date t.hat one of the events nentioned above has occurred, and one instal1rænt each year thereafter 'lmtil pëiid, together with interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%), with the provision that any of said installIœnts nay be naid at any tiIœ before maturi ty by the pëiynent of the principëil and accrued interest thereon. lmy property owner against whan and aqainst whose property an assessrcent has been levied may pëiy the whole assessrœnt chargeable to him without interest within thirty (30) days after the assessment is payable. The primary difference between our current policy and this policy would 'be that pëiyrœnt of the assessrcent would only occur if one of the changes listed above takes place. Interest would not be charged until such tiIœ as the change occurs. DISposition by Council [. 1 Approved ~ ~ Other (Describe) 1-: I I I I I I I II ¡I I I I I I ~ I I Reference Number Subject: Page Revision of Street Assessrcent 2 of 2 -- ~ATICN: The Property Managerœnt Division reccmœnds that the City CO\mcil approve the resolution authorizing the revision to the City of Arlington Street Assessrrent Policy. Ism cc: Linda Webb, Property Manager File attachrœnts :I I A' " . I í I I I I I I II I I I I I I I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING REVISIONS TO THE CITY OF ARLINGTON'S 1984 STREET ASSESS- MENT POLICY BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS: I. That the Ci ty of Arlington's 1984 Street Assessment Policy is hereby revised. II. A substantial copy of said City of Arlington's Revised 1986 Street Assessment Policy is attached hereto and incor- porated herein for all intents and purposes. PRESENTED AND PASSED on this the day of 1986, by a vote of ayes and nays at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Arlington, Texas. HAROLD E. PATTERSON, Mayor ATTEST: BOBBYE RAY, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: JAY DOEGEY, City Attorney BY 1-: I. I I- I I I I II I I I I I I I CITY OF ARLINGTON'S 1986 STREET ASSESSMENT POLICY The policy for street paving assessments in the City of Arlington, Texas, shall be as follows: A. Purpose This assessment policy shall constitute a guide only for the assessment of properties for street and side- walk construction, and nothing herein shall be con- strued.as a limitation upon the City of Arlington to assess 'for such improvements in any particular project where, in the opinion of the City Council, such project should be assessed in a different manner as may be allowed by law. B. Improvements Streets shall contain a paved section with curbs to the dimensions and specifications as provided in the Sub- division Rules and Regulations of the City of Arlington. c. Assessment Policy The property owners abutting each side of a street shall be assessed on a front foot basis not to exceed the following: 1. Ninety percent (90%) of all costs of improvements relating to the paving of one-half (~) of a street abutting the property. 2. One hundred percent (100%) of all costs of im- provements related to curbs and gutters. 3. One hundred percent (100%) of all costs of im- provements related to sidewalks. 4. The term "costs", as used herein, is a compre- hensive term including but not limited to such things as excavation, lime stabilized base, as- phalt oiling, asphalt surfacing, concrete sur- facing and enginee~ing costs. D. Assessment Rate The assessment rate shall be determined by dividing the I·: / . I I I I I I 1 II I I I I I I I E. total assessable costs, as provided by the Engineer's Estimate, by the front foot measurements of all abut- ting properties. The above method may be used regardless of depth and shape of lot and any peculiar characteristics thereof, subject, however, to a finding by the City Council of inequality and injustice which may require certain adjustments. Adjustments In addition to any other findings by the City Council determining whether inequality or injustice shall exist in any particular case, the following rules are ap- plicable: la. Abutting properties zoned "R", "R-I", "R-I-Z" , "A" or "MH" shall not be assessed for street paving (including curbs and gutters) an amount greater than the actual construction cost of one-half (~) of a twenty-eight foot (28') street, plus six percent (6%) for engineering services. lb. Abutting properties zoned liD", "T", "PD", "A-I", "A-2" , "A-3" or "A-4" shall not be assessed for street paving (including curbs and gutters) an amount greater than the actual construction cost of one-half (~) of a thirty-eight foot (38') street, plus six percent (6%) for engineering services. lc. Abutting properties zoned "PB", "0", "LR", "LB", ~'B", "B-I", "CP", "IN", "LLR" or "NW" shall not be assessed for street paving (including curbs and gutters) an amount greater than the actual con- struction cost of one-half (~) of a forty-four foot (44') concrete street, whichever is to be constructed, plus six percent (6%) for engineering services. 2. In the event an application of the "square foot" rule, as set out in Section 3.03d of the Subdivi- sion Chapter of the Code of the City of Arlington, results in a lesser assessment than that covered in the immediately preceding paragraph 1 hereof, then such lesser amount shall be assessed such abutting property. 3. In the event an application of the "seven cent" (0.0035) rule, as set out in Section 3.03e of the Subdivision Chapter of the Code of the City of (2) I·' I -I " I I I F. I I I 1 II I I I I I I I Arlington, results in a lesser assessment than that covered in the immediately preceding para- graphs 2 and 1 hereof, then such lesser amount shall be assessed such abutting property. 4. In any event, for owner-occupied "R", "R-l", "R-l- ZIt and "Tn zoned property used for residential purposes, the assessment shall not exceed $22.00 per front foot. Assessment Methods 1. Standard Method of Payment The cost assessed against said owners and their property shall be payable in annual installments of ··ten (10) in number, the first of which shall be payable within thirty (30) days from the date of completion of said improvements and their accep- tance by the City of Arlington, and one (1) in- stallment each year thereafter until paid, to- gether with interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%), with the provision that any of said installments may be paid at any time before ma- turity by the payment of the principal and accrued interest thereon. Any property owner against whom and against whose property an assessment has been levied may pay the whole assessment chargeable to him without interest within thirty (30) days after the acceptance and completion of said improvements. 2. Optional Payment Deferment Contract Payment of the total cost assessed against owner- occupied properties zoned for agriculture (nAil) or single-family detached ("R" and "R-I") uses may, upon execution of a Payment Deferment Contract, be deferred until such time as anyone of the follow- ing occurs: a. The property or any portion thereof is platted or replatted¡ b. An application is made for a building permit on any portion of the property; c. Access to the improved roadway is requested; d. A change in zoning on the property or any portion thereof is approved by the City Council; or (3) I I I I I I - I I I I I I I e. A change in ownership of the property or any portion "thereof occurs. The assessments shall be payable in annual in- stallments of ten (10) in nUQber, the first of which shall be payable within thirty (30) days from the date that one of the events mentioned above has occurred, and one (1) installment each year thereafter until paid, together with interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%), with the provision that any of saiã install~ents ffiay be paid at any time before maturity by the payment of the principal and accrued interest thereon. Any property owner against whom and against whose property an assessrn~nt has been levied may pay the who¡e assessment chargeable to him ~ithout in- terest within thirty (30) days after the assess- ment is payable. A property o~ner shall, within fiftcpn (15) ãays of the time such assessment is levied, exercise this Optional Payment Deferment Contract. Should the property owner not exercise said option ~ithin the time prescribed, then pay~ent shall be made pursuant to the Standard Method Payment as des- cribed in F.!. above. (4) I: Ie I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ '\. THE STATE OF TEXAS § Optional Payment Deferment Contract COUNTY OF TARRANT § WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: on the day of ,19 ,the Ci ty Council of the Ci ty of Arlington ;-Texas, adopted Ordinance No. , levying assessments for a portion of the cost of improving a portion of ; and said ordinance levied assessments in the amount of $ against the property owners described herein and owning property abutting said roadway more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached he":i:'eto and incorporated herein for all purposes; and it is agreed and understood that the City Council of the Ci ty of Arlington, Texas, held a public hearing in accordance with law, and that the herein described property owners were given an opportunity to speak at said hearing; and the assessments levied by the City Council of the Ci ty of Arlington, Texas, represent the special benefits received by the undersigned property owners because of the improvements of and the undersigned property owners are owners of property abutting said roadway zoned for agricul- ture ("A") or single-family detached ("R" and "R-l") uses; and the undersigned property owners have the option of making payment of their assessment in accordance with the Standard Method of Payment provided in the -City of Arlington's 1986 Street Assessment Policy or this Optional Payment Deferment Contract; and the undersigned choose to satisfy payment of their assessments through this Option Payment Deferment Contract; NOW THEREFORE, I: Ie I I I I I I I fit I I I I I I I L' . .. '" For and in consideration of the above and foregoing, the CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS ("CITY"), and the undersigned property owner ("OWNER") hereby agree to the following: I. The total cost assessed against OWNER for the property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto shall be payable at such time as one of the 'following conditions is met: a. The property or any portion thereof is platted or replatted¡ b." An application for a building permit is made on any portion of the property¡ c. Access to requested property¡ the improved roadway is on any portion of the d. A change in zoning on the property or any portion thereof is approved by the City Council; or e. A change in ownership of the proper- ty or any portion thereof occurs. II. UPon any of the above-described conditions being met, it . is hereby agreed that OWNER shall be obligated to begin payments of the assessment amount. OWNER shall pay to CITY ten (10) annual installments, the first installment due and payable within thirty (30) days from the date that any of the above-described conditions are met, and one (1) installment each year thereafter until paid, together with interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum. Provid- ed, however, that OWNER may pay any installment at any time before maturi ty through the payment of the principal and accrued interest thereon. III. OWNER, at his sole option or discretion, may forego the requirements of Paragraph II above and pay to CITY the sum of (2) I; -. I I I I I I I " I I I I I I I I ':, , ,.. ..... . $ within thirty (30) days after assessment becomes payable as described in Paragraph I above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed this the day of , 19 . CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS BY ATTEST: BOBBYE RAY, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: JAY DOEGEY, City Attorney BY OWNER BY (3 ) I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -- I I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST lOOP 820 - DECEMBER 8, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Echols called the meeting to order December 8, 1986, at 7:30 p.m. Present: Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Marie Hinkle Mack Garvin Harold Newman Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Ginny Pierce Rex McEntire Lee Maness Richard Royston Don Dietrich Members of the Press Absent: Virginia Moody Jim Ramsey Gene Riddle Jeanette Rewis Richard Albin 2. ROLL CALL Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman City Manager Assistant City Manager Acting City Secretary Attorney Finance Director Director of Planning Assistant Public Works Director Councilwoman Councilman Public Works Director City Secretary City Engineer 3. INVOCATION Councilwoman Marie Hinkle gave the invocation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 24, 1986 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the minutes of the November 24, 1986 Meeting. I. Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I December 8, 1986 Page 2 Motion carried 4-0. Councilman Newman abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 5. PZ 86-61 CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 1080, ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 24.2 REGARDING MASONRY CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS, ORDINANCE NO. 1421 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Oavis moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve Ordinance Number 1421. Motion carried 5-0. 6. SO 86-16 REQUEST OF BUDGET INN FOR VARIANCE TO SECTION 4.2 (A) OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE APPROVED Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak. Mr. Walter Leonard, attorney representing Budget Inn, appeared before the Council. Mr. Leonard stated that there was no frontage on the property of Budget Inn in which a sign could be located. Mr. Leonard stated that his client would like to erect a sign on one of the two locations that were proposed, as the Budget Inn was difficult to locate. Mr. Leonard presented a slide presentation to the Council to stress how it was difficult for people to locate the Budget Inn. Mr. leonard stated that his client only had half the occupancy rate at the present time and that the proposed sign was needed in order to increase the occupancy rate. Councilman Fisher asked if the Budget Inn was a chain operation. Mr. leonard stated that it was like a franchise but his client was the individual owner. Councilman Fisher asked if they would be willing to remove the sign that was presently on top of the Budget Inn. Mr. Leonard stated that they would be willing to remove the present sign. Mr. Mahendra Patel, owner of the Budget Inn, appeared before the Council. I. Ie I I I I I I I - I I I I I I ~ I I December 8, 1986 Page 3 Mr. Patel stated that he had owned the Budget Inn since January of 1985. Mr. Patel stated that he needed a sign so people would know where the Budget Inn was located. He stated that people who had made reservations were having difficulty locating the Budget Inn and that he was losing business because people that were looking for a place to stay did not know that the Budget Inn was even there. Mr. Patel stated that the proposed sign was needed to identify the location. Mr. Leonard reappeared before the Council. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked Mr. Leonard what the size of the sign would be and if a 30 foot high sign was what they were requesting. Mr. Leonard stated that the sign would be 200 square feet and that they would prefer a 40 foot height. Mr. Leonard showed the Council a drawing of the proposed sign. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the proposed 200 square foot sign at the location B indicated on the drawing at the height of 40 feet and with the stipulation that the current sign on top of Budget Inn be removed. Motion carried 5-0. 7. GN 86-131 DAVIS MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH REQUEST FOR A DRIVEWAY APPROACH ONTO lOlA DRIVE NEAR DAVIS BOULEVARD APPROVED Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak. Dr. Dean Posey, Pastor of the Davis Memorial United Methodist Church, appeared before the Council. Dr. Posey stated that he had several pictures that depicted locations that had curb cuts at a closer distance than they were requesting. Dr. Posey stated that when the plans were reviewed the proposed curb cut was refused. Dr. Posey ask the Council to consider granting the proposed curb cut. Various council members asked Dr. Posey questions regarding the proposed parking. They also voiced their concerns about the traffic congestion. I. I. I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I December 8, 1986 Page 4 Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle to approve the curb cut on Lola with the stipulation that the church have their architect design a curb cut for a single exit-only-lane at an angle that would only permit an exit to the west, with a right-turn-only sign governing said exit; and to permit a second curb cut on Davis Boulevard. Motion carried 5-0. 8. CITIZEN PRESENTATION None 9. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to adjourn the December 8, 1986 meeting. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Planning & Development Department: ubJect: 1/12/87 - Council Meeting Date: Request of Kenneth C. Whitely, Trustee, to Rezone PZ 86-53 .1:"art of lract IJS and 2A, lJ. .Moses Survey, Abst:ract: 115~,genda Number: from AG to R-2. Ordinance No. 1422 I I This Zoning Application is presented on a vacant tract of land located west of Precinct Line Road and east of the Flamingo Estates Subdivision, north of the St. Louis & Southwestern Railroad. The subject tract is 13.3 acres in size. This tract is the most northerly of three tracts being submitted by the applicant in a coordinated rezoning request for the area. The requested rezoning on the subject tract is from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential. The applicants stated purpose for the request is to allow the property to be subdivided into single family lots for development. The subject tract· is located adjacent to the existing Flamingo Estates development. The existing subdivision is also zoned R-2 Single Family. However, the Planned Development designation indicates that the required unit size minimums have been revised upwards in portions of the subdivision to 1800 square feet. The applicants have provided a layout of their proposed subdivision which indicates that the proposed development will be an extension of the existing development. At the Commission hearing several citizens, who live in the Flamingo Estates area, appeared to express concern that the proposed development should be required to provide access to the east to Precinct Line Road to lessen the traffic impact on their subdivision. has been submitted to the Commission containing a total of 61 signatures the proposed rezoning. Of these, twelve residents are within the zone of The petition did not contain enough signatures to constitute a legal The adjacent property to the south of the subject tract is the remainder of the applicants property. The tract immediately to the south is requested for R-3 Single Family Zoning. The applicants propose to utilize a required open drainage channel as the break line between the two zoning areas. RECO~IMENDATION : The Planning and Zoning commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-53 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract 1B and 2A, D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150 from AG to R-2 be approved with the stipulation that the minimum residence size be restricted to 1800 square feet. , I I Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget her Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I I ~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 C-I 1196 ,./ ~ jr~lt~~~ T III I r . . R~~;D' ~~'?- I .le ~ ~I~ R-~I-¡tJ~ ~_~;.. TZ..~:~, . ~~~ ~"' ct .. 1~ll ~~~~~. '37' \ ø~ I .; I ù""" ~~ t=~ti~ ~ . .0 .', M'/c' ~\ ~ , I' t -..L...'f'\ r--.. ./ R-2 ,\ I , I \ I- _~ 9-" "U ~ I U".J'4 r 1":: · , - I · ~2 - 'r-¡-¡ . ,." .. 1-2 SU ~ I: L 1\ ~ I r.... ! - J~2" ! ~ f I 1 I I T 1185 . ~.. ,.I. .r- \UI'lúA. lJl\ V~ :m ..j c.~ ~':/- 0/ I .~L ,.L I ~ ~.~ ~¥:=~;=~r. 7It I I \ ~ ~\f-"" ",. I I LITnmIrn~::::I'-?-(r-\~~",_ -pr-~r->- · '.J- . I R-2 .¡. ~ R 2 ' WlJJlIITIJ ~~~ I ~ ~"- r- -- I~- - &t- 1-- ~\~ - "'.... ....., : ",,- '>--~J-=>-~ - '- -.-. , , .. 1344 1- · Q I I I I I I I 1:::::,- ~t:i::b"'.-" 'l:: V ,1. , ,...~ ~\(." 1-" 'I I , I , r---; ~r r1~ ~_ L-~,. . ^~ ."" MAIN '3 - '--""~\1 ¡, f J I I ¡ I j Ih&.J ~ ~~ïLfŽ:1' I \ 1--" P -2 0°" o\" ß 1...--. ,." VAJ..J..I.V V~.:I.. ~~. Ac:. , r ~I _/~ø.ll"l , I U¡ 0' ~o ..Ë~ , I I I , I ~.\ j ~ . T. \ ! /^. I ~.. (}J ~... I '- ~o)(a ~ ~ oil J~'fL= t- ' ;'C." ' " " AG r I 1 : ~ù~ SNIV_Fl[LD . I -, FiJ : ;::: ~~_ 1_>- ,:'::~þC __~::= 'A" ST J I -st . 'f. - .-. , ~ '" ". >- ¡:::z¡¡,./O' "\ >- ~ ,2 I;t-",,_: t-- - t-- 13B7 o . . -~- J. ,~o't- >- i r'.........~ - .-. I 1 :- _::=~ ::::- -C-2 ~_~~o ...q:~~-¡¡f~ - ..UlJ'··'·, ,.' r I I I ïr~, 'l~~ ~~ . c :~L~~ r R-2~ ~~ fift..~;o to" 'l..Bfø-~~ tl '-- "--h?T1 {'----- . I .:~;tT ~'~r-- R-I :'~, ~~- n ( .,.". ,.. , ,- ~ ~ 9r~, I ·.f ~ I ...~" ~:.,;, ...- IU.",- ,~. " I :=: .f=. ....¡- r--' -'- ) ~ I Y Þ I r-::-o:- L _ 1\ I I ~ -JIJ~~I - 'N' AG ~VI~G~ {J I-I ~ - ~ .~ ;, ~ I \ ~ C i I I' I II.J[ ¡ 1 ¡ : i:q = -J i:j 11 . ~ I-- .;. / -. ~~ 0 'II ~;9~ " / / " -' ~ I " AG I ' ::=;;..-~' \ \ V" \ , 1\' ' AG \ "\ R-3 \ ~_ R-2 R-2 1264\.0 1343 t'v 1-2 I-I SU ~ p ~ h{l ~ I' Ie I I I I I 1 I I. - ,,- I I . --- .... ~- .... I 1 1 I I Ie I Page 2 ~ -p & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( There being no one wishing to spea , the Chairman called for those w· ing to speak in opposition to thi request to please come forward. There being no one wis the Chairman closed" Hearing. Chairman Bow stated that the replat creates a plit in the zoning of the lot. H said the additional area is prese ly zoned OC Outside Commercial an a residence is not allowed in OC ning. ~ PS 86-50 TABLED Mr. Tucker made the motion to table PS 86-50 until s~~h time as a zoning request is submitted for the property. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion to table carried 4-0. ". -0" .______.- ..._. 3. PS 86-54 Request of Harston Gravel Company for replat of Lots 5RA & 5R2A, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 86-54. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next three zoning requests would be heard together, but would be voted on separately. 4. PZ 86-53 Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee to rezone part ' of Tracts 1B & 2A, D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located east of Flamingo Estates, north of the railroad. ..¿- 5. PZ 86-54 Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee to rezone part of Tracts 1B & 2A, D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-3 Single Family. This property is located east of Eden Addition, north of the railroad. I' Page 3 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( Ie I 6. PZ 86-55 Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee to rezone part of Tracts IB & 2A, D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-4-SD Separate Ownership Duplex. This property is located north of the railroad and east of Eden Addition. I I I Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. -..:.: " I Owen D. Long, Engineer and part owner of the property, came forward. He stated that item #4 is for R-2 which is 9000 square foot lots, and #5 is from Agriculture to R-3 Single Family. Mr. Long stated this is buffered on the north by a drainage ditch. He said they plan to put R-4-SD Separate ownership duplex along the railroad and behind the County Barn. He said they plan to deed restrict them to look like the others in the area. I I Ie I I John Barfield, another owner of the property came forward. He said they had tried to rezone this property previously to R-3 and R-4-SD and there was some opposition so this time they have some R-2 and R-3 with less R-4-SD. Mr. Barfield stated they plan to build- them 1600 to 1800 square feet. I I I Chairman Bowen stated there had been a petition submitted in opposition to the three requests. I I Ie I Mrs. Calvert stated some more names have been submitted for the petition tonight. . .,~- Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. I' Page 4 ( P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 'I I I I I I Ie I ( Manuel Pasillas, 7400 Boca Raton, came forward. He said he would like to speak regarding item #6-Duplex. He said he feels there is plenty of duplexes in the city; why go and rezone more, build the ones you already have zoned first. Mr. Pasillas said duplexes were very depressed now. He said there are new duplexes that have never been sold or leased. He said they buy them for tax purposes. Mr. Pasillas said if this is the highest and best use for the land, it is contributing to the downfall of the area. He said R-3 does not conform with the area. He said this wou~d not attract people to the area. Mr. Pasillas said in Flamingo Two, 13 homes are 2500 to 3000 square feet and are being sold. He said he likes Flamingo like it is now. Mr. Pasillas asked all the people in the audience to stand who were in opposition to these requests. There were many who stood. Mr. Tucker asked Mr. Pasillas what he wanted to do with the R-2 request. Mr. Pasillas stated most of the houses in the area are at least 1800 square feet and he feels an 1800 square foot minimum would conform to the area. He said the minimums are what they are opposed to. Mr. Tucker stated the Commission is only a recommending body, but the City Council can stipulate larger homes. Mr. Pasillas stated they would like to have the area to conform to what is already there. ~. Mr. Tucker stated that the R-3 request is adjacent to an R-3 in Eden Addition. I' Page 5 ( P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Pasillas stated he believes there was a stipulation to larger homes there. Mr. Tucker asked Mr. Royston if that was true. Mr. Royston stated that to his knowledge, there was not a stipulation. Ms. Flippo stated that R-4 is contiguous. She asked what they had rather have there. Mr. Pasillas said to just leave the land vacant. Mr. Tucker said that was against State Statutes. He said you cannot deny a person the use of his land. Mr. Pasillas said the Commission could deny the zoning request. Mr. Tucker stated the Commission has certain limitations. Skip Weld, 8970 Hialeah Circle South, came forward. He said there is only one access road to Hialeah Circle South and North to the R-2 area. Mr. Weld stated he would like to keep it all R-2. He said anything north of the railroad has to come through Eden Addition and Flamingo Estates and the traffic would be bad. Mr. Weld said that Pulte Homes has gone on the other side of the highway and built R-2 next to the railroad and are selling them. He said he requests all the requests be for R-2. .¿. Mr. Weld said he requests that any construction be accessed to Precinct Line Road. He said Mr. Barfield owns the property and l-lr. Weld recommends they provide access so they could build a construction road through to Precinct Line Road. I Page 6 ( P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I ( Myrtis Byrd, 7312 Hialeah Circle West, came forward. She said she was not necessarily opposed or in favor of the requests. She asked what the deed restrictions would be. Chairman Bowen stated the owners were deed restricting to whatever conforms to the City Ordinance. Ms. Byrd asked if they would have an outlet to Precinct Line Road. Chairman Bowen stated he was not sure who owned the property to Precinct Line Road for an outlet. Ms. Byrd said she would be in opposition to the requests if they do not have an outlet to Precinct Line Road. Chairman Bowen said the Commission cannot tell them they can not use their property. Ms. Byrd said she would like to see them build R-2 with duplexes along the railroad, but not be allowed to build unless they have an outlet to Precinct Line Road. Richard Wrisley, 5812 Lance Court, Fort Worth, came forward. He said when they developed Flamingo Estates, they put in a culvert. He said the property originally drained, but now it drains into the culvert and onto his property. Mr. Royston stated Mr. Long would have to enlarge the culvert in Eden Estates. :¿. Mr. Weld came forward. He said the Commission stated they did not know who owns the property to Precinct Line Road. He stated that the Oak Hills Joint Venture owns the property along Precinct Line Road north of the County Barn. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 7 ~ P & Z Minutes , December 11 J 1986 ( .J I Chairman Bowen stated the ingress egress would be a platting matter and these are zoning requests. Mr. Tucker stated that the State Law says zoning comes before platting. Nick Samilo, 7312 Boca Raton, came forward. He said you are going to rezone this property to R-4 Duplex then he can come back every year and change it. He said why not make him build larger houses that would sell. Mr. Samilo said the developers are trying to make North Richland Hills a dump and he wishes the owner of this property would clean it up. ./ Mr. Long came back for rebuttal. He said these are not just duplexes, they are single family attached which are adjacent to R-4-SD. He said the R-3 request backs up to the R-3 and the creek and the R-2 is adjacent to the existing R-2. Mr. Long stated they do not own the property to Precinct Line Road. He said they have worked with Dr. & Mrs. Harris and bought one strip that was landlocked, but they were not willing to sell the other land. He said they wanted one million dollars for it. Mr. Long stated the R-3 1600 and R-2-1800 would be larger than the deed restrictions to the west. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. 4. PZ 86-53 APPROVED Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-53 with a deed restriction of 1800 square foot houses. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. ,../- 5. PZ 86-54 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-54 with a deed restriction of 1600 square foot houses. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 8 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 6. PZ 86-55 DENIED 7. PZ 86-56 8. PZ 86-57 9. PZ 86-5 ( i - Mr. Tucker said he knows what they are trying to do with the duplex zoning, but he was not sold on the idea of having to have duplex along the railroad. Mr. Tucker made a motion to deny PZ 86-55. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Mr. Tucker stated the Commission is only a recommending body, but he thinks that once this property is platted it will throw a tremendous --- load of traffic on the ingress-egress. Chairman Bowen stated the cases approved tonight will be heard by City Council on January 12th. e Chairman Bowen stated the n t 4 requests will be heard to ther, but voted on separately. Request of B. H. & . Joint Venture to rezone a portion f Tracts 2 & 2A1, J. C. Bradford Su ey, Abstract 140, from their prese classification of AG Agricultu to C-l Commercial. This propert is located at the southeast corne of Keller Smithfield Road and Sh y Grove Road. Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tracts 2 & 2Al, J.C. Bradford Survey Abstract 140, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-4-SD Separate Ownership Duplex. This property is located on the east side of Keller Smithfield Road, south of Shady Grove Road. ¿- Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to C-2 Commercial. This property is located at the northeast corner of Keller Smithfield Road and Wilson Lane. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas November 7, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-53 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-2 -REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 53 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. fbvrMAf Wr ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. j RWA/ra Enclosures cc: r~r. Rodger N. Line, City t1anager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development ...-1- Z')ning Review PZ 86-53 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I~ I~ 00 r(~ e :/ 1/ I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ,! .. ., , \ ( December 5th, 1986 City of North Richland Hills Re: PZ 86-53, PZ 86-54, and PZ 86-55 ( , /'-<: e J vC J ;r:?f~j~· /o/~f6 We, the undersigned, are against the zoning change of Tracts IB & 2A, D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150 from AG to R-2 Single Family, R-3 Single Family. and R-4-SD Seperate Ownership Duplex. We share several veiws as home and property owners of North Richland Hills, and would like to voice our opposition December 11, 1986 at City Hall. Name ---clç\.~~~_~~l_\~~__ .¡ ffiJlJ~-~__f?~_~_\J~_~~____ V _ \A'\D..__&1. . ~______ v i--l[j~~l_iL_ --~ -r~d- &~t.z~d--~{,¿¿x.&ÆiL.L_____ ~kJld--&4-------- ~--~~:~--------- 1/ ~Cef---g-_.Á.--('~1.~t__________ ~----------------------~----------- ---~-~-------------~----~-~~~------ ----------------------------------- --~-~------------------------------ Address 7 i9..r-~Ç9!--lfltf~!Y..---lZrL fz£f.¡;~u.ß.!!U.~_.a.l!.!'.. / 7'1£"r-r;;PJ'A/1!' e7 ------------~------------------ ~~-~-·lr1-~~L5t~L-Ç+ -:J-~~~ï~ù.~_RCl..~-- -gg-fJLJ1id1åJQ_&Ldt5: -2i~~_ß~~~ i9.~__d~_&~~. 7#!P"__/j¿4 ~A_Cic_J,4~____ }¿f¿~-J±~~~-~h--~~~_LJL__ ~º--~~~--- -"!- ----~-------------------------- ~--~-----~-----~----~~----~~--~ -~-------~--------------------~ -----------------------~----~-~ ( (:lt~¡ ()f IIJ·)rtl1 Ricl11aíl(j Hills i -. F - ... {. -..... P - .. t· 5' d F - _.'" - r:= ~' .... . I 1 ~... _ '-. . '01. ' l R ". _ .:i atl'- 0, .' ~.1 t-.. _:... ) ¡. -. t::: . ~ l.J.-1 ....' _f., .....~} J. .' '"' ()} j J' I~ I I I I I I Ie 2/ I I · ,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I a'4r¡--~___/~~__________ ... . I. Î : I T ~t-~~-~tJ_ç~________n_ ß-=4-~- -ÎJ_ref¿ý-~~__ I _:J~t~ : _ _tœ¿~~n_______n I v--~~Ylq{~~ I . :~út1:~~~_______ Ie I ( ", ;>.o ¡);c-'þ ~r ''6, ¡g a....¡<. r'/~/ilj~: ~N{;;. the undersigned, are- 8.gainsttlle zoning change of Tracts IB ê< 2A. D. 1vI(:~ses SU.r":l€"1;l. J.~1)stra.l:t 11 C;() f1'"()tn ~~(1 t..:..) R - 2 Sitl'2'1~ Fa.!11il T.lJ R - ~f Si11~2"1€' .¡. '.. \.',. '.' I..J F· ·!T .-. ,.~ R .... "D '::'.- ,'" '",- t" '-"T 1 .'", '",-..,.. D 1·....,. a.tnl l, -:.1..111..-1- .. - '1: -.... .)ep.'t':?t I:.~..f!: I.) ,,'\7ìl~ì .:....11 P UJ) ':::- ¡~. J. ~ .. T,N.;; share ~:eYeral vei':.iVS as home and propert;'7 owners 01" North Rkhland Hills, al1d \,h,rOl11·:j like t.-:. ,7()i-:e ()lJr ()Pp()siti()tl IJeCetìltu9"f II, 1 (~Ôf) a.t Cit~, Ha.11. . . I r:Iarrle ./ ~-----------~-------~-------~------ ----~----------~------~----------~- i.:.J. (1dr ess --_1~Ð-{_6QçftP.ftTQ_N -'12 -t2~I-~(!cL_~;iz~ ~, ~1s:1~~1£.~_~~s._:._ 8~lQJ:i¡~_~;J¿ ~. <fi~t ¡j~~C~~, ---~--------------------------- -rf{~~¿~4¿_ç;_~__~ . RýJ'I' 4:tg . d /'. ~ J"": -------------~~~~-~~t-~-- ~ ·72<13-&~fRk!£¿_._~J l~&-~~(z!~· --~~~D--tb-alrnJ-º~0-~ ß~B!Q_ -'=lL~0lw_f~Áli:]/l. 1'lt:J..- IIl-1~A-1f {Y£-. Á./: -------~----~----~----~-----~-- _?.1 ft.:d- -#..~-c.4 _ _ ~ _.~ ¿}(), ..¿- ------------------------------- ------------------------------- I· · I ~~{{~. rJ'fJ t I~ I I I I I I Ie I II I I I I I I_ I ( ....... ~... 1.. - - =. t 1.. f C' .:. ~~ L..~(.~tìl ~)~1 j _.J.l., l.:' () \.J (:it~.T of !'·l()rth RiGl11:3.!1(1 l1i11s ~ R A . r:l; ':'! t':', - t:: .~ P'7 ;i f:" - c:: Á ·at-!d Pz \ OJ. r w 0 '" .) ..}.. _.... V ...1...., '. _ ':~i {~I - ~I t::, '..,.F _.'.... ( ~ .~ ~1 ... ÎtrL{ - þ,-~/. ,,/S~ ~. ì;..J .(1 þ"' 0" if b 7 .1' ~!~le., the l..Uidersi~:rHd. are aQ"ainst t.he 2oninQ" chatl!2'€' of Tracts 1E i~~ 2A. D. '-'". 1._1 '.a. \.1 Ivloses Sttt'"Ta)'e'u', .l·\.t)stra.(:t 1150 [rl:)!}l .L~.(j tc.' R-2 Si11!21e Farrlil':.T1 R-'~( Si11Q"le J~ ~ I ~ u Fa.frlil,\T. ;3.t1(1 R -4-SD Sep€'rate ()'~l"tler~:11it) Dl\rJ...lle~~. ,. . J. Vlè share se'Iefal v€'i'ÿllS as 110m€' anc! PfO'l)€-ftV Own€'fS of North Ricllland . I- ~ Hills. and would lU~€' to v(>ic€' OUf opposition D€'c€'mb€'f 11, 1986 at City Hall. I"latne ~/~:7Ø_i~~t~_______________ --~~Qf~~~~~~~----------- -d~da--~~~k/~ ,/ J1!t-r}:-Æ7k?;.~~_~(-- <JL=q ~" D fE?- --~~()---------------------- ~~~- 7t-~-¿dc - - -- -"--- Ç) 1 .Ch¡ ~~f - i~ 9- ~4!:¿1:!f: - ./i.~ j.;.Ul ::-:.'.. 'è;¿_ _~J ~e1A/-___IJ-_~¿~ ~~_ ,....., /7¿ ---~~-~--~~----- ------ --~~~~-~----------- ddf1at!~~2---_-- ~~-~---------------- ----1~!~B..~~4_------- --Ù!~DA~~~ ~~(i(lr€-ss -- 2_~ j_~_~_~~._ !?!..?~__ 73("2- 2> t Uf /lh'1.:J.~ -~-----~----~--~-~-----------~- __l_?/:.~~~<~~_~L~ & --- -3..?.k3-Æ~~L_e~~ -féJ-~(J±~.~JJt\__~~}?_._~ " Z~-~L_/i~~_{l!::"_____ _7¡IQ¿¿~_~ _1ª{;¿---7J.~~__t~_ -Z;}LJ.__1it-..~~__(~ 2~~~~:/-Þ.r:~"-d___C~~ . 2JJ!_~__H!j}Je1iÆ__~L_~ -_23?!!:LJ.t1 Jàb:M-Clc ~ _7. 3:2L - - JdL A Lð7Jil- C Lt(_" -1 ;!-51 l~lLJv C~ w· ------------------------------- -,..!- .J.:s.S-L-l:i~~~~\:l_~ L0 · I" ( J. .. ~¿'¡ 'at .I,J," Ie I -----~~-~----------- I --~---- ------~-------- -~-~ºß-£#------- --1Þ-y~~--ß~---------__ I I --------------~-~----~------~---~------ I ~-~----------~~-~~--~---------------~-- I -~------~-----------~----~---------~--- -----~--------~~--------~--------~---~- I ------------------------------~-------- Ie --------------~----------------------~- I ~~-----------------~------------------- I ---------~----------~-------------~---- ~-~-----------------------~--~-------- I -----~------~---------------------~---- I -------~------------------------------- I -----~------------------------------~-- I -----------~--------~-----~------------ ---------------------~----------------- I Ie --~-------------~--~------------------- --------~----------------~~------------ I ~. J.i L.J ( .,) .) .. , ---Z.'!.lZ-__Md.':.~?!t!___ç./~. ~. -- -~ ~ ~~ - ---ßs__-ª~\J_~_ -fqSi-_t-hR~J;_ÆJ:t___Ç_~~_ /¡J , _7..l1Z,-µì!~~_ek~.1~,,µ/ -2:11J-¡¿~~__~1~1~ ------------------------------- -------------------------~----- ----------------------~-------- --~---------------------------- ------~-----------------~------ ------~~----------------------- -------~----------------------- ~--------------------~--------- -----------~------~------~----~ ------------~-----------~-~--- ----~------------------------- -----------~--~--~-------~--~- .--1- --------------~---~----------- ~-~---~---~---~--------~------ -------------~---------------~ -----------------------~~----- I·· I e I I I, I· I I I Ie ii, I I I I I I Ie I ( ( ~. 11,/91:;' UG, r~1 ... .... ···1"-11.~ ... r c t 1-, 1 ~.... ~ f)e .L...tt"!'J~ J. ~)tj' ) e' ~.' ':' I..) . (:1 ty' ()Î I',I·:)rtl1 F~icl11a.!lcl Hills R~: FJZ f.f:)-5.3r} ¡::'2 t3t)-54) atlC! PZ !~ f. _ 1::, E:: V J _"J) Tßl~J tll€' u.tl(ier::;f~,:·:tl€,tjt ;:tf€' ¿1~~·;3.i!lst the 2()t11ti!=-.'· Glla.t1~2~e CIÏ Tra.(:t~3 If:a ;3<. 2Þ~J D. _9. 1_' '__....., Ivlos€'s Su.rv€'v. Abst.ract 111)0 from AG to R-2 Sin2'1~ Familv) R- .;;. Si!1!21€- .. '.., '.J,. 'J ;..J Family, and R-4-SD S€'p~rat~ OV.lllersl1ip Du.plex. T,l<lõ¢ slBr€' s~v€'ral V€'iV.lS as 110m€' and prop€'rt;.r ovm€'rs of North Richland Hill~3. and >;Nould lite€' t.() voic:~ our opposition D€'(:€'mb€'r 11, 19136 at City Hall. ~lat}le A- -' --j~ ./J~¡R J ~------------~~---------- æ(~~_!:~____ --9n~Ø~-- -~--~~-------- !./~-¿~--------- 0~-1d~_______ ¿¿4~{~ ______ cX-~¡£------'~~________ ~-ÆØ~____- ~~-f¡j~~~- --,/)-~('~~,--- / . ....l?.<ldress Z4~-'f-_~4_7) ~ 2LJ.. ø_ K _ _ ~_~ _t;. tl. _Ii ~~ _~ _ J}... (!.~~Ø~~~_4~~ ~!.!-~!&dY!~-ß~ÁJ _"2 _Cf.'-~ _1iocl!!. _ ..tøºM._ ~{.Æ:f_&.~~_~ð:~ N Ie¡S$..- &('-'l_~Hf"M~C!-)': ,_'_~_l___~___~__çT _8:~~~9._~~~~_~hc-~ ! If..~_~ -- ~'?.~ ~ _ _ _f.~ _ ~~ __ _maßç¿(!Ø:.~_fr¿tJ__ -¡qÆg_Ep41i_1(~AL ¿.J. ~J~~~~tt _l4:º--'---~-~_ç_~_RA:.:tp 1\./' 7¿(or:¡ ~ ~IJ .-1- ~~---~---~-~~------~--~--~----- I ( Ie I r'·l ~.i~IvI E ~_~kº=l_L_ß1l:1.tl~_i_--- I -------~-------~~----~~---~------------ I -------------~---------------~~-------- I ---------------------~----------------- I ----------~---------------~------------ ---------------~-----~-~--------------- I -----~---~-~-~----~-------------------- I -------~------------------------------- Ie ---~~------------~--~---~-------------- I --~---~~-----------~--------~---------- ---------~-~~~------------~--~--------- I ---------------------~----------------- I --------~--------~-~------------------- I ----------~--~------------------------ I ~---~---------------------------------- --------~-------------~-~----~--~--~--- I -------~-~----~--~~-------------------- I Ie ~-----------~---------~---~-~--------~~ ----~-------~~---~-----------------~~-- ----------------~---~------------------ I -------------~---------------~----~---- ( ~~IJrJf~Ess .(~'_9-r. ti--~ð-C-~Po.:k 11 ----~-~~---------------~------- --~-~--~---~--------------~---- ------------------------------- --------~---------------~------ --------~~~------~------------- ---------------------~----~---- ~-----~~---~~~----~--~------~-- -----~-~-----~----~-----~--~--- -------~-------------~---~-~--- -----------------------~------- ~--------------~-~------------- -------~---------------------~- --~~---------~----------------- ---~--------------~~~-----~--- ....!- ----------~------------------- ----~--------~---------------- -~------~~------~------------- ------~--~-------------------- ---------------~-------------- ---~---------------------~---~ I' Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I ORDINANCE NO. 1422 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-53 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. ALL that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, Tarrant County, Texas and the Oziah Rumfield Survey, Abstract 1365, Tarrant County, Texas and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point at the northeast corner of Flamingo Estates Addition, to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-166, Page 6, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 89 degrees 28 minutes East along the south boundary line of Flamingo Estates Addition, Phase II, to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, 719.8 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 15 degrees 58 minutes West, 1.4 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 29 minutes East, 72.7 feet to a point on the westerly line of a 100 foot Texas Power and Light easement as recorded in Volume 2925, Page 507, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 27 degrees 46 minutes East along said westerly line 549.1 feet to a point for corner on the north line of a 50 foot proposed drainage and utility easement, said point being on a curve to the right whose radius bears north 40 degrees 20 minutes West at 128.8 feet; THENCE Southwesterly along said north line and along said curve to the right through a central angle of 05 degrees 48 minutes a total arc distance of 13.0 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE South 55 degrees 28 minutes West along said north line, 637.5 feet to a point for corner at the beginning of a curve to the right whose radius bears North 34 degrees 32 minutes West at 292.7 feet; THENCE Southwesterly along said north line and along said curve to the right through a central angle of 21 degrees 28 minutes a total arc distance of 109.7 feet to a point at the end of said curve; I'" Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I I' I Page 2 THENCE South 76 degrees 56 minutes West along said north line, 19.5 feet to a point for corner, said point being the most Easterly Southeast corner of Lot 33 in Block 8 of Eden Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, as recorded in Volume 388-175, Page 68, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 24 degrees 06 minutes West along the East boundary line of said Lot 33, 80.0 feet to a point at the Northeast corner of said Lot 33, said point being the southeast corner of Lot 1 in Block 1 of said Flamingo Estates Addition; THENCE North 23 degrees 41 minutes West along the east boundary line of said Flamingo Estates Addition, 898.8 feet to the place of beginning and containing 13.3 acres of land, more or less. This property is located east of Flamingo Estates Addition, north of the railroad. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. 0.., ..<.7 .:"":! " 0 /,k:_~)\ -_:'~.' ~ /' A /.' '. _.... -t .,J ; f '...., /_ _ f ;."; ~,.. ( / / \"' . ~." ~ J -./ t C~IRMAN PLANNÍNG AND ZONING COMMISSION r~:::-~-'~~-;') 1"~7 /' -,; l" ~~7:::-:- :.<, :,:";;.~~.,{~~': o-_:-,~~~_" ~;. -:..-'~_ SECRETpRY PLANNING-ANÐ-ZONtN~COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-53 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF ATTEST: MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Planning and Development Department: &Ubject: Request of Kenneth C. Whitely, Trustee, to Rezone Tract IB and 2A D. Moses Survey, Abstract l!)U trom AG to R-3 Ordinance No. 1423 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PZ 86-54 1/12/87 This Zoning Application is also presented on a portion of the vacant tract west of Precinct Line Road and east of the Eden Addition north of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad. This is the second parcel in the applicants coordinated rezoning request. The subject tract is 8.4 acres in size. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-3 Single Family Residential. The applicants stated intent is to develop the tract into single family lots in conformance with the R-3 District criteria. , ~ The subject tract is located adjacent to the portion of Eden Addition which is currently R-3 Single Family. The applicants have submitted a proposed layout of their project which indicates the development will be an extension of the existing development. The Staff noted to the Commission the third portion of the proposed development is a strip of duplexes which would buffer this tract from the railroad to the south and the TESCO power line easement to the east. The Commission received a petition in opposition to this proposed rezoning which contained a total of 61 signatures. None of the citizens lived within the zone of influence of the subject tract. RECOMMENDATION: I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that zoning Application PZ 86-54 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract 1B and 2A, D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150 from AG to R-3 be approved with the stipulation that the minimum residence size be restricted to 1600 square feet. I Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . .// "--', / (' . ¡ , IUI- ~ /27(¡/~' t?~ ent Head Signature City Managér CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITE , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 c-( 1196 C-I S U  '1. ..-2- AÕt To 2-t AP.. ".4-.' ,J1' 1-' R-3 1090 I / I I / I I " I ' \\ \ , \ , \ " , \ \ \ , ---'- AG I-I SU R-3 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 PS 86-50 TABLED 3. PS 86-54 PS -54 ROVED 4. PZ 86-53 5. PZ 86-54 ( There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman called for those wishi to speak in opposition to this re est to please come forward. There being no one wishin the Chairman closed' th Hearing. Chairman Bowen ated that the replat creates a sp t in the zoning of the lot. He s d the additional area is present zoned OC Outside Commercial and esidence is not allowed in OC ng. ,- " Mr. Tucker made the motion to table PS 86-50 until such time as a zoning request is submitted for the property. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion to table carried 4-0. Request of Harston Gravel Company for replat of Lots 5RA & 5R2A, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 86-54. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next three zoning requests would be heard together, but would be voted on separately. Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee to rezone part'of Tracts IB & 2A, D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, fröm their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located east of Flamingo Estates, north of the railroad. .¿- Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee to rezone part of Tracts IB & 2A, D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-3 Single Family. This property is located east of Eden Addition, north of the railroad. I Page 3 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 c- Ie I 6. PZ 86-55 Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee to rezone part of Tracts IB & 2A, D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-4-SD Separate Ownership Duplex. This property is located north of the railroad and east of Eden Addition. I I I Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. ,. . I I Owen D. Long, Engineer and part owner of the property, came forward. He stated that item #4 is for R-2 which is 9000 square foot lots, and #5 is from Agriculture to R-3 Single Family. Mr. Long stated this is buffered on the north by a drainage ditch. He said they plan to put R-4-SD Separate ownership duplex along the railroad and behind the County Barn. He said they plan to deed restrict them to look like the others in the area. I M I I John Barfield, another owner of the property came forward. He said they had tried to rezone this property previously to R-3-and R-4-SD and there was some opposition so this time they have some R-2 and R-3 with less R-4-SD. Mr. Barfield stated they plan to build them 1600 to 1800 square feet. I I I Chairman Bowen stated there had been a petition submitted in opposition to the three requests. I I Ie I Mrs. Calvert stated some more names have been submitted for the petition tonight. ~!- Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. I Page 4 ( P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I . I I I II I I I f I ( Manuel Pasillas, 7400 Boca Raton, came forward. He said he would like to speak regarding item #6-Duplex. He said he feels there is plenty of duplexes in the city; why go and rezone more, build the ones you already have zoned first. Mr. Pasillas said duplexes w~re very depressed now. He said there are new duplexes that have never been sold or leased. He said they buy them for tax purposes. Mr. Pasillas said if this is the highest and best use for the land, it is contributing to the ~/ downfall of the area. He said R-3 does not conform with the area. He said this wou~d not attract people to the area. Mr. Pasillas said in Flamingo Two, 13 homes are 2500 to 3000 square feet and are being sold. He said he likes Flamingo like it is now. Mr. Pasillas asked all the people in the audience to stand who were in opposition to these requests. There were many who stood. Mr. Tucker asked Mr. Pasillas what he wanted to do with the R-2 request. Mr. Pasillas stated most of the houses in the area are at least 1800 square feet and he feels an 1800 square foot minimum would conform to the area. He said the minimums are what they are opposed to. Mr. Tucker stated the Commission is only a recommending body, but the City Council can stipulate larger homes. Mr. Pasillas stated they would like to have the area to conform to what is already there. -~- Mr. Tucker stated that the R-3 request is adjacent to an R-3 in Eden Addition. I Page 5 ( P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I M I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Pasillas statèd he believes there was a stipulation to larger homes there. Mr. Tucker asked Mr. Royston if that was true. Mr. Royston stated that to his knowledge, there was not a stipulation. Ms. Flippo stated that R-4 is contiguous. She asked what they had rather have there. Mr. Pasillas said to just leave the land vacant. Mr. Tucker said that was against State Statutes. He said you cannot deny a person the use of his land. Mr. Pasillas said the Commission could deny the zoning request. Mr. Tucker stated the Commission has certain limitations. Skip Weld, 8970 Hialeah Circle South, came forward. He said there is only one access road to Hialeah Circle South and North to the R-2 area. Mr. Weld stated he would like to keep it all R-2. He said anything north of the railroad has to come through Eden Addition and Flamingo Estates and the traffic would be bad. Mr. Weld said that Pulte Homes has gone on the other side of the highway and built R-2 next to the railroad and are selling them. He said he requests all the requests be for R-2. .¿. Mr. Weld said he requests that any construction be accessed to Precinct Line Road. He said Mr. Barfield owns the property and Mr. Weld recommends they provide access so they could build a construction road through to Precinct Line Road. I Page 6 ( P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I ( Myrtis Byrd, 7312 Hialeah Circle West, came forward. She said she was not necessarily opposed or in favor of the requests. She asked what the deed restrictions would be. Chairman Bowen stated the owners were deed restricting to whatever conforms to the City Ordinance. Ms. Byrd asked if they would have an outlet to Precinct Line Road. ~.., . Chairman Bowen stated he was not sure- who owned the property to Precinct Line Road for an outlet. Ms. Byrd said she would be in opposition to the requests if they do not have an outlet to Precinct Line Road. Chairman Bowen said the Commission cannot tell them they can not use their property. Ms. Byrd said she would like to see them build R-2 with duplexes along the railroad, but not be allowed to build unless they have an outlet to Precinct Line Road. Richard Wrisley, 5812 Lance Court, Fort Worth, came forward. He said when they developed Flamingo Estates, they put in a culvert. He said the property originally drained, but now it drains into the culvert and onto his property. Mr. Royston stated Mr. Long would have to enlarge the culvert in Eden Estates. ..¿- Mr. Weld came forward. He said the Commission stated they did not know who owns the property to Precinct Line Road. He stated that the Oak Hills Joint Venture owns the property along Precinct Line Road north of the County Barn. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 7 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( Chairman Bowen stated the ingress egress would be a platting matter and these are zoning requests. Mr. Tucker stated that the State Law says zoning comes before platting. Nick Samilo, 7312 Boca Raton, came forward. He said you are going to rezone this property to R-4 Duplex then he can come back every year and change it. He said why not make him build larger houses that would sell. Mr. Samilo said the developers are trying to make North Richland Hills a dump and he wishes the owner of this property would clean it up. Mr. Long came back for rebuttal. He said these are not just duplexes, they are single family attached which are adjacent to R-4-SD. He said the R-3 request backs up to the R-3 and the creek and the R-2 is adjacent to the existing R-2. Mr. Long stated they do not own the property to Precinct Line Road. He said they have worked with Dr. & Mrs. Harris and bought one strip that was landlocked, but they were not willing to sell the other land. He said they wanted one million dollars for it. Mr. Long stated the R-3 1600 and R-2-1800 would be larger than the deed restrictions to the west. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. 4. PZ 86-53 APPROVED Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-53 with a deed restriction of 1800 square foot houses. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. -.1- 5. PZ 86-54 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-54 with a deed restriction of 1600 square foot houses. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. I Ie I I I I I I I -- 'I I I I I I I Ie I Page 8 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 6. PZ 86-55 DENIED 7. PZ 86-56 8. PZ 86-57 9. PZ 86-58 ( Mr. Tucker said he knows what they are trying to do with the duplex zoning, but he was not sold on the idea of having to have duplex along the railroad. Mr. Tucker made a motion to deny PZ 86-55. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Mr. Tucker stated the Commission is only a recommending body, but he thinks that once this property is platted it will throw a tremendous load of traffic on the ingress-egress. ;)' Chairman Bowen stated the cases approved tonight will be heard by the City Council on January 12th. Chairman Bowen stated the next requests will be heard toget r, but voted on separately. Request of B. H. & L. oint Venture to rezone a portion of racts 2 & 2A1, J. C. Bradford Surv ,Abstract 140, from their present assification of AG Agriculture 0 C-I Commercial. This property located at the southeast corner Keller Smithfield Road and Shad rove Road. equest of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tracts 2 & 2A1, J.C. Bradford Survey Abstract 140, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-4-SD Separate Ownership Duplex. This property is located on the east side of Keller Smithfield Road, south of Shady Grove Road. ~!- Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to C-2 Commercial. This property is located at the northeast corner of Keller Smithfield Road and Wilson Lane. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. . CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas November 10, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-54 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-3 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 63 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. fuad ()J ~ @£. RICHARD w. ALBIN, P.E. - R~JA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development ..!- Zoni ng Revi ew PZ 86-54 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR.. SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I~ I ~ 00 ~~ e :/ I~ I I I I I I Ie I I 'I I I I I Ie I . .' , t' to . t ( /~(Î J~c J' ~: 7'f.e j~. /o/~f6 . ( December 5th, 1986 City of North Richland Hills Re: PZ 86-53, PZ 86-54, and PZ 86-55 We, the undersigned, are against the zoning change of Tracts IB &. 2A, D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150 from AG to R-2 Single Family, R-3 Single Family, and R-4-SD Seperate Ownership Duplex. We share several veiws as home and property owners of North Richland Hills, and would like to voice our opposition December 11, 1986 at City Hall. Name Address ",/ / ----:z U~~_ ~C7- ----~~ð!.!{{?_____ ~--~:&~b________ ~~'!.~~-~~l_\~~__ ~ ffi-~_t-~__E~_~_l~-'~~____ V - ~\(\.--Th..ct1, .l.dl______ V J--!¿A~d-il.._ --- --Z¡~J~J- &~z~I?-~~¿~~L;______ . ~J!d--&4-------- ~--~~~--------- v flCef---g_-~_(.~~L_________ 7 !:J!..f..-R~--.IfLtfp!Y..___fZ.L £z.rf.~_!.ß..(!U~_LJ..!!~ / ZZf..~J/¡ølð..!!tc_~L ~~-~-·lr1-~~ì.St~~L-Ç+ -:J-~~~ï~Q<;{i.._Ra..~__ -KCL1LjjùJUt:Þ__C1L&t5: -2i~~_ß~~~ i~~--~~_6._~. 7rJ.£k-_/j¿4kA_.cic_~~____ 11'2~--1±~~~-~h._~~~_WL__ ~~9__~_~~___ ../- --------~-------------------------- ----~-------------------------- ~---~~----~--------~-------~------- --------------------------~~--~ ---------~------------~----~------- -----------------------~------- --~~~-~--~-----~------~~---~-----~- ------~--------------~-----~~-- I c Ie I I'-l ~~1vIE OL-shº=1-L-ß!l1.t1e_i____ I --~--~----------~---------------------- I --------------------------------------- I ----------~------------------------~--- I ------~--------------~----------------- ---------------~----------------------- I -------------~------------------------- I ---~--------------------~-------------- Ie -------------------------------~------- I --~---------------------------~-------~ --------------------------------------- I ---------------------------~~--~------- II --------------------------------------- I -------------------------------------- ~-------------------------------------- I -------------------------------------~- I ---------------~----------------------- I Ie ----------------------~---------------- --------------------------------------- ------------------------~-------------- I -------~--~------~------------------~-- .~ c . .. ,-\I)DF~ESS Êll-~~--f2ð-c-~-Q¿Y) ------------------------------- ---------------------------~--- -----------------------------~- ---~-------------------------- ------------------------------- ----~-----------------------~-- ---------------~---~-----~----- -------~----------------------- -----------------------------~- ------------------------------- ------------------------------- --~---------------------------- ~------------~----------------- ------------------~----------- ------------------------------ ----~--------------------~-~~- ---------------------~-------- --------~------~-------------- ------------------------------ -------------------------~---- .---". ~- ¿- 1 ,- I,: e I I I·", . . I I," " I I I Ie I ",.~., I" I I I I I Ie I . . ,f c D€-Get!lt'er 5t.l1,. 1986 Cft}T ()f I'·I·)rt1i Richla.tlc! Hills R~: PZ ô6-53, PZ &6-54, and PZ ô6-55 ( ~ . ~F.r ~ ~l-'':::' 1 i +"I"~ A t·~l· 1:¡·Ilt:::...·J '~It- A ':ll:t::tl" tlC t th~ 7,'-, rIl' ne:I' ,'" tl":'t t1'''· A ""I- Tt-a. ·...t.:- 1 E .~.. ?,\ D II 'J, l.l. '... ....u.....J ..~;::, ... u, ..... ... '- O~' .I..... . v ~v.l.. ;:. 'J.I..... 6" ... \; ..... .' t..... ... n.. . Moses Survey, Abst.ract 1150 from AG to R-2 Single Family, R- 3 Single- Fêmli1y, and R-4-SD Seperate- O\'\Tfle-rship Duplex. ~_ II¡ 19/.5" U<:, Wi& share s€-v€-ral veiws as 110me and propert}T ovmers of Nort.h Rkhland Hills, and \,,,ould like- to voice our opposition Deceml)er II, 19ô6 at City Hall. r-l arrl e A- - __)~ ./J~¡R ~ ~-----------~~---------- æ(t4t1~_~~____ --9~~Ø~-~~-- _&_---~~------- !.£~-¿~------~~- 0~_1d~__~~__ ¿¿4~{~ ______ cK~¡f---,--~---- ~-ÆØ#:;----- ~~-f¡J --'/;-1./ ~~(___ /- , -~, - , . ~ ---- -------~- A<ldress - . Z4!¿-1-_~4 7J'JL, 2~º-K.--i$Æ_Çtt_tf~~_~_ ß... (!~~~~~-~~~~ t!:!.!_~a~~_~_ß~ÁJ -2:.'!l~_1iocd_~غM._ g1-ß_&~S:-t!l_¿<A:~ N ~9ss..-&(.-4._:?Hf~M~~~ '_'_.$_l___~___~__ç:¡- ~~9.~~~-~-~~~_~hc-.t- ! '!.~-~-- ~'3'-~~ ___ f.~ _ ~~__ -'1ddªjJç¿r;~~_~tj__ -1.~Æg_ER!!:fl-¿r~AI t!.,L . '-------- ---j~~-~-stt -1~º-J-b-~-t;_It±_Rfl._lP""'" - 7¿{CJ'f ~ ~1J ---~------~----~--------------- .¿ I 1'(. \·1.... Ie I -----~~-~----------- I I I --------------------------------------~ I -------~------------------------------- I -~-----------------------~------------- --------------------------------------- I --------------------------------------- Ie ---------------------~----~-----------~ I ~---------------------~---------------- I --------------------------------~~---~- ~-~---------------------------~------- ,I --------------------------------------- I ---------------------------------~----- I --------------------------------------- ----------------------------~---------- I ----~---------------------------------- I Ie ----~---------------------------------- --------------------------~-------~---- I ..,1,..' !.... ,j ,j J .. ---'l-!.Ll___&!'!:~t?!_¿__ç/~. ~ . ---~ß~ J#----ß5__.ß~\J_~_ -fts~L}_hÅ:-_l;ålt___Ç_~/L_ ~, -7¿/;Lµì!,~~-ek~.2~~d _2,11 j-~Ç!-t.{.-J1.__~l.,lLl~ ------------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------------------~------ ------------------------------- ----------~-------------~---~-- -------------~----------------- ------------~---------------~-- --------------------------~---- --------~----------------~----- ------------~----------------- ---------------------------~-- -------------------------~---- ..1- -------------~---------------- --~--~-~-~--------~----------- -----------------------~--~--- -~----~---------~------------- - , I .r ~j ~. ~ b ~ ( I 'J'Ð r le/ I 1 I I I I Ie I I ,I I I I I Ie I ( !"""t.. .~... tì' 1'" '·'1· ~ t ~l 1 Q ., t'~ l"~f....~ ¿)t:::; j..~.. .' () ) (:i t.,,\T of r·¡ c' rt.h Ri çllla.tl d Hills , Reo: PZ ô6-53, PZ ô6-54, and PZ Ô6-55 ( ~fþ-, · ii..~ .,; l · ~> . \' I J v ~. ,;.J r ~ ... t¡.; -! ð )l;T.·", tI·' .-. 1·+-·~ - t·""l·,-ttl,·'·j ·-1t···.... ·~·-··-l·n·""'r· 4-i.-..- ,..·....~l·n~ ·..1--.·~tl""'l··.. '-'1- Tt-~ ·..t~ IE' ,~. .~ tl ;;1 I I 'V, ! ':;' _Ul I,~ ':;' .;> Õ 'V \.. " .; ':;' .;\ g d ~ ~ '.,U i;' .:;A'! ¿ ;:;, '_ h'~ ~:, ':.' ',' ;:.1 '- ".:;) .. I~:< .::. ¿Â. ~. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150 1"rom AG to R-2 Sin'~l~ Fami17, R-3 Single Famil}T.. and R -4-SD Seperate Ownersllip Duplex. ~lle share se~,1eral veiws as 110me and DrODertv owners 01" N<)rtll Ric111and . 06 I Hills, and \^lould 1i1:.e to voice our opposition December 11, 19ô6 at Cit? Hall. rlat11~ -' ~~:t~-~~~~~_______________ . --~~~~~~~,~~~~----------- -~~rda.--~¿~:>6l.!~:~-u V jJJlf:.l,~_.£'k?_:"ry;_~(__ -~~_-fL~________ .~~~- l~--~ - - -- ~--- -~~'~¿1-1~_./1~~¡¡-'-~_ _-4 ~e11/---_kkl~tc ~~L_ ------~----- ------ --~,¿~t1~_~___________ ;df1a1!~1}-k2-_____ ~~-~---------------- ----1~~~!?.~~'t'----____ --Ù!~~DA~~~ "-J '" . £~(.i\jress -- 2_3: L~ _~_~:!:!_! !!..?.~__ 7 3r"l. ~ , CA- /lA7"'l:s. ~ -----------------------------~~ --J!.-?I:.~;{¿='~¿_?q~_ç¿.~L~ /l,! ,.. -3..2.k3-.ƪ::~¿_e~~ -f!J-~(J1:t-'~j~~J!t\__~n~._·_~ · Z~-:{{--/i4~_C.~_____ _7~IQ¿¿4~_~ -1ª{~-__M4~__(~_ -ZJLJ...__1ft...(.A_~_(~ 2.¿~~~:/~Citª'___C~ð . 2JJl-~--H!A_Je5[Á-_Ci_~ -_23ç¿~LJi1 f\~~i1__Q~.. , -7...3DL--JdLfjLeJJ1._CL~_. _.!- -1 ~51 I*~lt.dv C~ w. --~----~---------------------~- .J~s..L_bi~~~~~~ w · . .. II!/ I I I I I I Ie · .K;~t¿~~----.-------- II ~--___~~______~_________ I ( M~ç¡--~---/Iã~__________ -. ~., I T f91Mf-~~_):¡Li(~___________ II --_J~~~_ _ _ -~ff?ç~~___________ I v--~l1tA:¿~, I ~~~~~------- Ie I ( í:lty of r'lort.h Riclllatl\.i Hills T;\,. P'7 ~ ,~-~ .~ P'7 0 6-:: 4. ·~·ld- F'7 ~ ~-= 5 &...~. ... (J v ../ _'J ... 0 .)... Q.L _ (.J V j ( JjJ . . w€:. t1H tUl(i~rsign~?(l. ar~ againsttl1~ zoning chang~ of Tracts IB 03< 2A. D. Mos~s Survey, i-¿bstract 1150 from AG to R-2 Sing1~ Fami1~.1, R-.3 Single Fami1;'~ a.nd R-4-SD Seperate O'\"mership Duplex. w~ shan~ se-veral veivvs as home and property O\o\1tlers of North, Richland Hi11s.. and would lik~ t.o voice our opposition Dei~~mt"~r 11.. 19ô6 at City Hall. f:l at!l ~ / --~-----~--------~----------------- ----~~----------------------------- I.ål.(idress 1 ÞJc.'Þ r¡ It d... ¡<. C¡,. , '¡j~ /:),/ J¡' ___'1~D_{}ßQÇftJkTO_N ~~12 . -t2~f-6c!é&_;{l~ ~, ~1s:)l~~t~~LLÇQ:.S_~_ ß:tlQJ2j~~,~~_~~ ~ 1f£t ¡j~~C~ ~, ----~---------------------~---- ?f{~::4~¿_ç;~__~ . ð:l[:(gJ&h_Ll£_.__S-~ ·7-2<1J-&~_fpk!£¿_._~J 1~&_~~~!~. --º~~~-4_alrnttº~0_~ ß~B!Q --ttß-Ü..1ll1luÚlt: J/1. 1'1t::J.- !ff/?I-e.41f (Ø!-. V. ---~-~---~-~---~~--------~~--~- , -?.1.0d--~Æ~__~L<_.Æ(). ------------------------------- ------------------------------- _¿- I I. I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I ORDINANCE NO. 1423 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-54 the following described property shall~/ be rezoned from AG to R-3. COMMENCING at a point at the most easterly southeast corner of Lot 20, Block 7 of Eden Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, as recorded in Volume 388-175, Page 68, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said point being on the northerly boundary line of the St. Louis-Southwestern Railroad (a 100.0 foot private right of way); THENCE North 24 degrees 06 minutes West along the east boundary line of said Eden Addition, 127.1 feet to a point on the centerline of Bradley Drive (a 50.0 foot public right of way), said point being the point of beginning of the herein described tract; THENCE North 24 degrees 06 minutes West along said east boundary line, 571.9 feet to a point at the most easterly southeast corner of Lot 33, Block 8 of said Addition, said point being on the north line of proposed 50.0 foot Drainage and Utility Eastement; THENCE North 76 degrees 56 minutes East along said north line, 19.5 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the left whose radius bears North 13 degrees 04 minutes West at 292.7 feet; THENCE Northeasterly along said North line and along said curve to the left through a central angle of 21 degrees 28 minutes a total arc distance of 109.7 feet to a point; THENCE North 55 degrees 28 minutes East along said north line, 524.6 feet to a point on the centerline of a public right of way; THENCE South 27 degrees 46 minutes East along said centerline, 198.6 feet to a angle point in said centerline; THENCE South 30 degrees 35 minutes East along said centerline, 338.6 feet to an angle point in said centerline; THENCE South 55 degrees 28 minutes West along said centerline, 706.7 feet to the place of beginning and containing 8.4 acres of land, more or less. I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 This property is located east of Eden Addition, north of the railroad. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. ~/l æ --;}.U~;) CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ¿e~:, ?a~~_ D-A _ -----c- I .,..-0 ~{~-<-~"-"_-'-/___ ~ '- _ . l SECRET~Y PLANNING ANn-20NING OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-54 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: ubject: Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to Rezone Aaenda Number: PZ 86-56 a Portion of Tract 2 and 2AI, J. c. Bradford ~urvey, ~Dstract 140, from AG to C-1 Ordinance No. 1424 1/12/87 - Council Meeting Date: I I This Zoning Application is presented as one of four coordinated rezoning requests on an agricultural tract of land located on the southeast corner of Smithfield Road and Shady Grove Road and immediately north of the Green Valley Tract Site. The requested rezoning on this parcel is from AG Agriculture to C-I Commercial. The subject tract is located directly on the southeast corner of Shady Grove Road and Smithfield Road. The applicant's intent is to secure zoning which will capitalize on the City's Thoroughfare designation of Smithfield Road as a four lane Collector and Shady Grove Road as a six lane divided Arterial Thoroughfare. The proposed location of the commercial tract will correspond with the overall zoning pattern proposed by the applicant for the entire 100 plus acres of the 'coordinated request. In the development of the overall project the applicants will be required to participate in the improvements of both of the Thoroughfares which front the subject tract. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-56 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract 2 and 2AI, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from AG to C-1 be approved. , , Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ ~n.g BUd~ ~ ~m~'3?:a~/;;~~;u~e CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITE Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of J I \t I I I -, \ ~" (/ -. ---... -- ~-., ! I~ I. _ I\ELI.ER . _ -:_________. _____ ----+ ...~ - ----.--. - - ------: .. I I I . R-2 flOg I R-2 AG I ~ t~ · ~~---' ''_. ----, ,.- - - \ t,., '. -at u. . , .. -" I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I Page 8 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 6. PZ 86-55 DENIED / // ."" ,/ 7. PZ 86-56 8. PZ 86-57 9. PZ 86-58 ( Mr. Tucker said he knows what the re trying to do with the duplex ng, but he was not sold on the ea of having to have duplex ong the railroad. Mr. Tucker ade a motion to deny PZ 86- This motion was seconded by Ms lippo and the motion carried 4-0. Mr. Tucker stated the Commission is only a recommending body, but he thinks that once this property is platted it will throw a tremendous load of traffic on the ingress-egress. Chairman Bowen stated the cases approved tonight will be heard by the City Council on January 12th. Chairman Bowen stated the next 4 requests will be heard together, but voted on separately. Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tracts 2 & 2A1, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to C-l Commercial. This property is located at the southeast corner of Keller Smithfield Road and Shady Grove Road. Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tracts 2 & 2Al, J.C. Bradford Survey Abstract 140, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-4-SD Separate Ownership Duplex. This property is located on the east side of Keller Smithfield Road, south of Shady Grove Road. ..!- Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to C-2 Commercial. This property is located at the northeast corner of Keller Smithfield Road and Wilson Lane. I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I Page 9 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( 10. PZ 86-59 Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located on the south side of Shady Grove Road, approximately 791 feet east of Keller Smithfield Road. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Owen D. Long, Engineer and part owner, came forward. He showed his overall master plan of the city. He said item #7 is from AG to C-l. He said Mr. Barfield had owned it for several years. He said it is located at Shady Grove Road and Keller Smithfield Road. Mr. Long stated there are two houses along Keller Smithfield Road that are not included in this property. He said item #8 is from AG to R-4-SD to form a buffer to the R-2. Mr. Long said item #9 is from AG to C-2 Commercial which would border on Keller Smithfield Road and the proposed Wilson Lane. He said item #10 is from AG to R-2 which would have 9000 square foot lots. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. 7. ¿. PZ 86-56 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-56. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen stated this is a large area of duplexes and he doesn't feel he could support this request. ·~, I Page 10 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 I. I 8. PZ 86-57 DENIED I I 9. PZ 86-58 APPROVED I 10. PZ 86-59 APPROVED I I I . 11. PZ 86-60 I I I I I I I f I ( Ms. Flippo made the motion to deny PZ 86-57. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 4-0. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 86-58. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 86-59. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone Tract 5A, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182, and Tract 1, H.L. Al Survey, Abstract 65, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to C-1 Commercia. This property is located on the est side of Precinct Line Road, uth of Shady Grove Road. Chairman Bowen 0 ed the Public Hearing and ca ed for those wishing to speak in vor of this request to please co forward. Owen . Long, Engineer and part owner, carn forward. He-stated they had 1ed to purchase this property some time ago to make their master plan work. He said they had to go to Oklahoma and buy a lady a house there before they could secure this property. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. ¿- Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-60. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 4-0. I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I_ I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas November 10, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-56 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO C-l - REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 15 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~ W,~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R\~A/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development ¿. Zoning Review PZ 86-56 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I t I ORDINANCE NO. 1424 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-56 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to C-l. ALL that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of that same tract described to John H. Gillis (1/3 interest) as recorded in Volume 86, Page 523, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and a portion of that same tract described to John W. Barfield as recorded in Volume 5451, Page 286, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point at the northwest corner of said tract described to John W. Barfield, said point being at the intersection of the apparent South right-of-way line of County Road #3001 (Shady Grove Road) and the apparent East right-of-way line of County Road #3076 (Keller Smithfield Road); THENCE North 88 degrees 25 minutes East along the north boundary line of said tract described to John W. Barfield and along said apparent south right-of-way line, 791.2 feet to a point; THENCE South 01 degrees 17 minutes West, 415.3 feet to a point; THENCE South 88 degrees 25 minutes West, 791.2 feet to a point on the west boundary line of said tract described to John W. Barfield and on said apparent east right-of-way of County Road #3076; THENCE North 01 degrees 17 minutes East along said west boundary line and along said east right-of-way line, 415.3 feet to the place of beginning and containing 7.5 acres, more or less. I Ie I I I I I I I " I I I I I I I I" I Page 2 .~ This property is located at the southeast corner of Shady Grove Road and Keller Smithfield Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. . a~... /70 / .- / v/ c~ :.~-' C:::::::---:-1 .-.. 7 I'" a.,-~ =-'-'.-c." - ~ ð ~ _ ~,/ "..- I ,:;;.'-~ . I'~~ SECRET~Y PLANNINS ANпuNING~OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-56 IS HEREBY REZONED. THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I I I_Department: l Subject: I I I I I ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 1/12/87 Council Meeting Date: Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to Rezone d N b PZ 86-58 AllAn a urn er: a Portion ot Tract L, J. c. Hradtord ~urvey, AbstracL l~ from AG to C-2 Ordinance No. 1425 This Zoning Application is also presented as a part of the coordinated rezoning request for the property on the southeast corner of Smithfield Road and Shady Grove Road. This particular tract is located on the northeast corner of Smithfield Road and the proposed extension of Wilson Lane. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to C-2 Commercial. The applicant is proposing the corner of two future Thoroughfares be designated as a commercial site. No indication is given in the applicants submittal as to why this request is for C-2 whereas the previous request on the northerly end of the project was requested for C-1. The Staff noted to the Commission that the southeast corner of the proposed intersection, which is part of the Green Valley Track Site was previously approved for commercial use, that the northwest corner of the intersection in the City of Keller is currently zoned commercial, and that another applicant is proposing to rezone the southwest corner of the proposed intersection to C-2 commercial in zoning application PZ 86-69. In the process of developing this tract the applicant will be ..... improvements to both Wilson Lane and Smithfield Road adjacent .~ RECOMM:ENDATION: I ~ ~ responsible for to the subject tract. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-58 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract 2, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140 from AG to C-2 be approved. ~ I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I , I.J --- 1===] I ,{I ( 1 , '. . \ ~ I ' . ! ¡- '- to. '-I Oi .~¡ I:. ~r I~I i~1 i \ I \ I~ ( ; J~ ~" , ., " . V2-~,--S~ Aer Tð (,,-1 '. . I AG. ' ~~) hÞr'¡ ~~:¡~~:\J ì\:.~~;:~~I";;-~" '~~" ~,,;': ~··~.',·':':"-\\1~"\ .\)'::1:' ~flifo"" :.¡'," , c ¡-.. ':-:: ; . ~'..:. ~~ '!~;~ . :h¡:)' . ~( ~'r It! I~.~, ';(' . "- ".~?,' t,4,. :,' '1~"'\'I;?þt: . r~ } 'i'I'~' (,', __..J . t. . . r:·:. ....k;~ : I'. i', í!'j ¡'(',:! '. U,· . ¡-~. .i.~ · l ~ J .~r.; "·~·"f'''' .b," ,'..... "l'~; t\ >. ,*,," ~-f r.1'~'(¡J,~~~J~~~,~ ~:~~~:~ a~~S-~~: '1'J ~~ J t~ ;-¡'j:{ ~~]:~~ ;~,ti . ,: \:" ~ t· I :.~ .:: . ; ~J.I' ""~;.'1~'1~1\ ..: ~&,.o·~~ .,! _ __ _ ; Pl ~~S'7 ,f9,. t':\:~.: .l·J~;·~ Jl¡' .~~ ,.~~:'; G ,"" '. '. . ~, ~ ~~,~~ f<{i .ìi~~f.l ~-~ { ~,: , LJI - N, To t.-·HÞ: t f;;.l:ri¡!t. .';¡' . ,'i, : " ¡.j ;:,~:~; ~;):} ;~'i;;'1\f;'(~¡,:: i( '/:.f. ¡"{':ht':"'i:ì..'¡,¡. 'J L\."...'.,','~., :: I ; ~ i*~~,~~~:EW ~n7!J~fg '~J: ,,? ; , ;' I; ~~~~ , ,'~ :-",íJ } ~.··...i..>¡-..r-. r~,.:;~..~~.,t.\,. /...\, t' ~ -.----l._____,_ I "1 \ . '. "" ......,. 'J .., ;., . I ~ f J ) ¡,\"L. . ~, "'j 'uAI,,- n ¡ ,p....;,.' .:~ ) ~'~n ì:V,~' . .. i: I '.!:- '.~.;.,'!.. 'J -. - f I ll1-ì !.L ,I·" ò~ "';' , ':,:': ..: ;<~;J~,,~:'i~ :( ~ ';~~ ; . : ~ I ,! ~,_ . .......:..~ "':, ~:.,.¡; ';' .'. '! 'I I.- L,.. _ _ '"-j : ~.~..; . . .~. ···t~ ....::':,: .~. :~~:~:'>-;f·iÞ.. ....,t I ~ _. _ I :. .~ Tð (-'1:. .:,.:.~. : ~~..},. ;.:,~ ~~~ . ~l .. -·f t _ .. 4 I -r- ---1 ~ _ _ ~" . . r-.t'. ~~'~ ~ ,:". .~ "'q · ' .....,. fI' r.J.!IÞI~. · .... · '114 ~ .R-2 _~;¡ .!~ ~·~·'."';'h.=,»Io~~ ;~ ~~,,~ ,~.~f .\~~.~. . i ~ -...~ . ~ . :.,~ ··i...·...,·,,¡~·:..·~~·. "\ ~...'-,."'.~~.J.... :\. I ; ,'202 _ -- -] I . ~.-.....- ~.: ¡".' 1" C-2 /' ~~~ET--,J~~ , 1321 ' -. . - -;:i I -/:t--- I 1-- "---L I r' ~1;¿,,/'6'.:1 j 1- : . 122(/ l . ~/. . ~l ~,~ . '~ I'IOA. ~ 00, ~.., ~ /' ---~~ u_~& _ I . .. ., .- ï ~ " ~.-~. , _+0 -- ~_.- '{ G+- --if; -, ,~ .--.;. . ~ . ( 1 ~ i· I I I t' R 12 I R-2 1/09 C-2 1320 R-2 ~, '0' I -'.........,,"" , -' I .A_G. "53 I . I. _ _ _ _ ,_ o' j . . ... --------- I, <>-'-- ----- -- Wi . ....' r- - - ~ _ _ _ ~. ..,t . ;>r- - - -,- - - ~. -. - ,.: - - -: ~ - - - - .. - - - . I R-3 R-2 1175 .) " i I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I Page 8 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 6. PZ 86-55 DENIED 7. PZ 86-56 8. PZ 86-57 9. PZ 86-58 ( trying to do with the but he was not sold having to have railroad. lex zoning, the idea of ex along the made a motion to deny This motion was seconded by and the motion carried 4-0. Mr. Tucker stated the Commission is only a recommending body, but he thinks that once this property is platted it will throw a tremendous load of traffic on the ingress-egress. Chairman Bowen stated the cases approved tonight will be heard by the City Council on January 12th. Chairman Bowen stated the next 4 requests will be heard together, but voted on separately. Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tracts 2 & 2A1, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to C-1 Commercial. This property is located at the southeast corner of Keller Smithfield Road and Shady Grove Road. Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tracts 2 & 2A1, J.C. Bradford Survey Abstract 140, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-4-SD Separate Ownership Duplex. This property is located on the east side of Keller Smithfield Road, south of Shady Grove Road. ¿- Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to C-2 Commercial. This property is located at the northeast corner of Keller Smithfield Road and Wilson Lane. ~ I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I Page 9 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( 10. PZ 86-59 Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located on the south side of Shady Grove Road, approximately 791 feet east of Keller Smithfield Road. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Owen D. Long, Engineer and part owner, came forward. He showed his overall master plan of the city. He said item #7 is from AG to C-1. He said Mr. Barfield had owned it for several years. He said it is located at Shady Grove Road and Keller Smithfield Road. Mr. Long stated there are two houses along Keller Smithfield Road that are not included in this property. He said item #8 is from AG to R-4-SD to form a buffer to the R-2. Mr. Long said item #9 is from AG to C-2 Commercial which would border on Keller Smithfield Road and the proposed Wilson Lane. He said item #10 is from AG to R-2 which would have 9000 square foot lots. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. 7. ¿. PZ 86-56 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-56. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen stated this is a large area of duplexes and he doesn't feel he could support this request. I Page 10 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 Ie I 8. PZ 86-57 DENIED I I 9. PZ 86-58 APPROVED I 10. PZ 86-59 APPROVED I 11. PZ 86-60 I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I PZ 86-60 APPROVED ( Ms. Flippo made the motion to deny PZ 86-57. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 4-0. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 86-58. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 86-59. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone Tract 5A, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182, and Tract 1, H.L. A en Survey, Abstract 65, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to C-l Commerci This property is located on th west side of Precinct Line Road, outh of Shady Grove Road. Chairman Bowen ened the Public Hearing and c led for those wishing to speak i avor of this request to please c e forward. Owe . Long, Engineer and part owner, c e forward. He-stated they had ried to purchase this property some time ago to make their master plan work. He said they had to go to Oklahoma and buy a lady a house there before they could secure this property. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. ¿- Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-60. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 4-0. I Ie I I I I I I I " I I I I I I -- I I ( ( KNOWl TON-E NClISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas November 10, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 Nort~ R;chland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PI 86-58 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO C-2 ,REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 15 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. £~~~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R~I AI r a Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works r·1r. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development ~!- Zon; ng Rev; ew PZ 86-58 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I il I I I f I .~ ORDINANCE NO. 1425 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-58 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to C-2. ALL that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, Tarrant County, Texas and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the south boundary line of said J.C. Bradford Survey, said point being South 88 degrees 25 minutes West at 945.0 feet from the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Cherokee Estates, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-68, Page 19, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 88 degrees 25 minutes West along said South boundary line of the J. C. Bradford Survey, 814.3 feet to a point at the southeast corner of that same tract described to Kenneth Taylor, trustee, as recorded in Volume 5346, Page 180, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 01 degrees 13 minutes East along the east boundary line of said tract described to Kenneth Taylor, trustee, and also along the approximately centerline of County Road #3076 (Keller-Smithfield Road), 617.5 feet to a point; THENCE North 88 degrees 32 minutes East, 814.9 feet to a point; THENCE South 01 degrees 17 minutes West, 615.9 feet to the place of beginning and containing 11.5 acres, more or less. I Ie I I I I I I I lit I I I I I I I I" I .~ Page 2 This property is located at the northeast corner of Keller Smithfield Road and the proposed Wilson Lane. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~e~~~~ SE~ PLANNIN~D ZÕÑ~l:ISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-58 IS HEREBY REZONED_ THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY 'r :... I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Planning and Development Department: .Ubject: I 1/12/87 - Council Meeting Date: Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a A d N b PZ 86-59 Portion of Trac t 2, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstrac t 140 -gen a urn er: from AG to R-2 Ordinance No. 1426 I I This Zoning Application is the fourth and last parcel of the coordinated rezoning request for the property located on the southeast corner of Smithfield Road and Shady Grove Road. This particular tract is the easterly or interior tract of the overall parcel. The tract is 56.9 acres in size. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential. The intent of the applicant is to develop the property into single family lots in conformance with the R-2 District criteria. I The applicants have submitted a proposed layout of the subdivision. The orientation of the tract will yield a grid layout of lots running north south between Wilson Lane and Shady Grove Road. . The easterly line of the subject tract is contiguous with another tract belonging to the applicants which has previously been approved for R-2 use and Preliminary Platting has been approved. I I I Ie I RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-59 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract 2, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140 from AG to R-2 be approved. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget ~ Department ea~ ~ign~ture CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITE Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I ,J -Ie , , "- " I I If I ('i ~, I '01 ,III:, I !=: i~1 I . i3 I L -EuER ¡ ~ L _e. __ _________ ______________ _. __ ,. . 0. .. .. . \ I I v!- tõ'- - S~ ~tr TO (.- t ",\)4: , 00. ¡ I'~ . :-=:~ ._-~r.,- : ~ i..···", ~ .0(.-.. .., ~O - -;-'- ~ ~~ -'VI: -, ,t- ~ ...~. ~ . ( j.--~ I I I R 12 Ie I, R-2 1109 I R-2 AG. I .~I I I . . R-I 1322 · R-3 ~:! I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 8 p & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 6. PZ 86-55 DENIED .... ./4r' // r /' ."",'" ,.,." / ( ( Mr. Tucker said he knows what the~ trying to do with the duplex z ng, but he was not sold on the · ea of having to have duplex ng the railroad. Mr. Tucker de a motion to deny PZ 86- This motion was seconded by ~iPPO and the motion carried 4-0. ~/ Mr. Tucker stated the Commission is .~y only a recommending body, but he ~ thinks that once this property is ~ platted it will throw a tremendous load of traffic on the ingress-egress. Chairman Bowen stated the cases approved tonight will be heard by the City Council on January 12th. 7. PZ 86-56 8. PZ 86-57 9. PZ 86-58 Chairman Bowen stated the next 4 requests will be heard together, but voted on separately. Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tracts 2 & 2Al, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to C-l Commercial. This property is located at the southeast corner of Keller Smithfield Road and Shady Grove Road. Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tracts 2 & 2Al, J.C. Bradford Survey Abstract 140, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-4-SD Separate Ownership Duplex. This property is located on the east side of Keller Smithfield Road, south of Shady Grove Road. ¿- Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to C-2 Commercial. This property is located at the northeast corner of Keller Smithfield Road and Wilson Lane. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I Ie I Page 9 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( 10. PZ 86-59 Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 2, J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located on the south side of Shady Grove Road, approximately 791 feet east of Keller Smithfield Road. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. /- Owen D. Long, Engineer and part owner, came forward. He showed his overall master plan of the city. He said item #7 is from AG to C-l. He said Mr. Barfield had owned it for several years. He said it is located at Shady Grove Road and Keller Smithfield Road. Mr. Long stated there are two houses along Keller Smithfield Road that are not included in this property. He said item #8 is from AG to R-4-SD to form a buffer to the R-2. Mr. Long said item #9 is from AG to C-2 Commercial which would border on Keller Smithfield Road and the proposed Wilson Lane. He said item #10 is from AG to R-2 which would have 9000 square foot lots. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. 7. PZ 86-56 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-56. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. ¿- Chairman Bowen stated this is a large area of duplexes and he doesn't feel he could support this request. " ~ I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 10 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( 8. PZ 86-57 DENIED Ms. Flippo made the motion to deny PZ 86-57. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 4-0. 9. PZ 86-58 APPROVED Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 86-58. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. 10. PZ 86-59 APPROVED Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 86-59. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. 11. PZ 86-60 Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone Tract SA, W.C. Newton Survey Abstract 1182, and Tract 1, H.L. len Survey, Abstract 65, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to C-l Commerc 1. This property is located on t west side of Precinct Line Road, south of Shady Grove Road. Chairman Bowen ened the Public Hearing and led for those wishing to speak i favor of this request to please c e forward. · Long, Engineer and part owner, c e forward. He stated they had ried to purchase this property some time ago to make their master plan work. He said they had to go to Oklahoma and buy a lady a house there before they could secure this property. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. ¿- There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 86-60 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-60. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 4-0. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I , . ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas November 10, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North R;chland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North R;chland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PI 86-59 REVIEW LETTER, IONI NG FROr·1 AG TO R-2 . REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 15 ~/e have received the referenced zon i ng case for our revi ew and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~?uI /Á/( RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. \ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development ¿ Zoning Review PZ 86-59 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283.6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I ORDINANCE NO. 1426 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-59 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. ALL that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the J. C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 140, Tarrant County, Texas and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of Cherokee Estates, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recordedin Volume 388-68, Page 19, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 88 degrees 25 minutes West along the south boundary line of said J. C. Bradford Survey, 945.0 feet to a point; THENCE North 01 degrees 17 minutes East, 2625.7 feet to a point on the approximately centerline of County Road #3001 (Shady Grove Road); THENCE North 88 degrees 25 minutes East along said centerline of County Road #3001, 945.0 feet to a point on the east boundary line of that same tract described to John H. Gillis (1/3 interest) as recorded in Volume 86, Page 523, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 01 degrees 17 minutes West along said East boundary line of that same tract described to John H. Gillis (1/3 interest) 2625.7 feet to the place of beginning and containing 56.9 acres, more or less. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I Page 2 This property is located on the south side of Shady Grove Road, approxilately 791 feet east of Keller Smithfield Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. ~æ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~£7 " 0/7'""·' ~}F~~~ SECRETAJY PLANNINC-M~u 2ðNING OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-59 IS HEREBY REZONED, THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY "'" I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS _Department: Subject: ~ I Planning and Development 1/12/87 Council Meeting Date: Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to Rezone Agenda Number: PZ 86-60 Tract 5A, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 11~Z and Tract l~ H.L. Allen Survey, Abstract 65, from AG to C-l Ordinance No. 1427 This Zoning Application is presented on a tract of land located on the west side of Precinct Line Road at McDonwell School Road. The tract is approximately 3.6 acres in size. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to C-l Commercial. The applicants wish to add this tract to their large tract to the west which has frontage on Davis Boulevard and will contain the extension of Shady Grove Road. This larger tract is currently zoned C-l Commercial. The subject tract allows the applicant to control the location and curvature of the proposed link between Precinct Line Road and Shady Grove Road. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-60 requesting rezoning on Tract SA, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182 and Tract 1, H.L. Allen Survey, Abstract 65, from AG to C-l be approved. I Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) == · 4~ ~ -- , Departmën Head ~nature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITE Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 "¥" II I I I I I . . .' ~ "t :./ ··:...:1 r"ì .';--'-1 ,K;'-:-~~ t -----.., II ~ 202 - . .. AG pa. cab -b 1. Âi:r 1b ð~J 0-1 0... , AG I Page 10 P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 { ( Ie I 8. PZ 86-57 DENIED Ms. Flippo made 0 deny PZ 86-57. This mot- was seconded by Mr. Schwinger the motion to deny carried I I I 9. PZ 86-58 APPROVED r. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 86-58. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. 10. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 86-59. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. I 11. PZ 86-60 Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone Tract 5A, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182, and Tract 1, H.L. Allen Survey, Abstract 65, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to C-l Commercial. This property is located on the west side of Precinct Line Road, south of Shady Grove Road. I I ~ I Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. I Owen D. Long, Engineer and part owner, came forward. He stated they had tried to purchase this property some time ago to make their master plan work. He said they had to go to Oklahoma and buy a lady a house there before they could secure this property. I I I Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. ¿- I ~ I I There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 86-60 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-60. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 4-0. I Ie I I I I I I I " I I I I I I -- I I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas November 10, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-60 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO C-l 'REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 27 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. tór~ P.E. R~IA/ra Enclosures cc: r·1r. Rodger N. Line, City f'1anager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development .j- Zoning Review PZ 86-60 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I ORDINANCE NO. 1427 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-60 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to C-l. ALL that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the W. C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182 and the H. L. Allen Survey, Abstract 65, Tarrant County, Texas and being of~ that same Tract One and Tract Two conveyed to Hershell E. Allison etux as recorded in Volume 2588, Page 69, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a steel rod on the west right-of-way line of Precinct Line Road (a public right-of-way), said point being on the north boundary line of that same tract conveyed to Jeffiah J. Bell as recorded in Volume 2530, Page 234, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 87 degrees 32 minutes 12 seconds West along said north boundary line of that same tract conveyed to Jeffiah J. Bell, 267.85 feet to a steel rod; THENCE North 02 degrees 52 minutes 17 seconds East passing a steel rod at the southeast corner of Brentwood Estates as recorded in Volume 388-97, page 31 of Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas at 25.00 feet and continuing along the east boundary line of said Brentwood Estates a total distance of 797.74 feet to a steel rod on the said west right-of-way line of Precinct Line Road, said point being on a curve to the left whose radius bears North 73 degrees 18 minutes 07 seconds East at 421.70 feet; THENCE southeasterly along said west right-of-way line and along said curve to the left through a central angle of 21 degrees 42 minutes 30 seconds a total arc distance of 159.78 feet to a steel rod at the end of said curve; THENCE South 89 degrees 34 minutes 57 seconds East along said west right-of-way line and along the north boundary line of said Tract One, 29.50 feet to a steel rod on a curve to the right whose radius bears South 43 degrees 01 minutes 35 seconds West at 375.38 feet; I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I Page 2 THENCE southeasterly along said west right-of-way line and along said curve to the right through a central angle of 46 degrees 11 minutes 10 seconds a total arc distance of 302.60 feet to a steel rod at the end of said curve; THENCE South 00 degrees 47 minutes 14 seconds East along said west right-of-way line, 398.00 feet to the place of beginning and containing 3.6378 acres of land. This property is located on the west side of Precinct Line Road, south of Shady Grove Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING ~~ ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. ~æ~~ CHÅIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION _/ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-60 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY ~ '\ I, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: Council Meeting Date: 1/12/87 ubject: Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to Rezone a d N b PZ 86-62 Anen a urn er: Portion ot Tract )~lA, w.c. Newton ~urvey, AbstracL 118~ from AG to 0-1 Ordinance No. 1428 I I I This Zoning Application is presented on the residential tract of land located on the west side of Precinct Line Road north of L. D. Lockett Road and the proposed extension of Wilson Lane. The tract is 1.0 acre in size. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to 0-1 Office District. The location of the subject tract will be on the corner of Precinct Line Road and a proposed residential street which is to be developed with the property contained in Zoning Application 86-63 which is requesting R-2 zoning. No proposals have been submitted by the applicant with the application to indicate the proposed use of the property. However, there is an existing residence under construction on the tract which possibly could be converted to office use. In any development of the subject tract the applicants will be required to participate in the dedication of right of way and the future improvements to Precinct Line Road adjacent to the property. In the layout submitted with the application the proposed subdivision includes a proposed street along the north boundary of the subject tract. This street is situated such that the applicants would provide half of the needed right of way and the adjacent property owner, who is not a party to the application, would I provide the other half. The applicants would, under the Subdivision Ordinance, be required to secure the entire right of way. RECOMMENDATION: request1ng rezon1ng on a portion of Tract SEIA, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182, from AG to 0-1 be approved. I I , Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget ~ ..~ t...J ) ~ - "Departme ead 5, nature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 1==-'--"'/' ~ I I I I I ; I R-2 c-\ 1254 :.1 ë- I ~ ~-G.O Àfr To (..' AG pë.. Cõ (,..Cø 1- Àl:r 10 0-1 I L8".~D A6 f. ~..I 1- I rz.., · :. JY(, ~ 0-1 AG ~." .., I Page 11 ~ p & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( Ie I Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together, but voted on separately. I 12. PZ 86-62 Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract SE1A, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to 0-1 Office District. This property is located on the west side of Precinct Line Road, north of the proposed Wilson Lane. I I I 13. PZ 86-63 Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone Tract 8B1A, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, and a portion of Tract SEIA, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located west of Precinct Line Road, north of the proposed Wilson Lane. I I Ie I Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. I Owen D. Long, Engineer and part owner, came forward. He stated they need this piece of property to give an outlet to Precinct Line Road. He said it is presently zoned AG and they are requesting 0-1 Office District on the corner with R-2 on the back. Mr. Long stated they plan to reconstruct the existing building for a sales office. He stated they have an outlet on Davis Boulevard, but need one on Precinct Line Road. I I I Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. ¿. I I Ie I Marjorie Dodd, 8125 Precinct Line Road, came forward. She said she needed some questions answered. She asked about them refurbishing the house at 8662 Precinct Line Road to an office building. J .J'" I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I: I I I I I Ie I Page 12 ~ p & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( Mr. Tucker stated that if granted 0-1 zoning, it would be office zoning unless they requested another change. Ms. Dodd asked what size the residential zoning would be. Mr. Tucker said the houses would be a minimum of 1600 square feet with 9000 square feet lots. Ms. Dodd asked how much right of way would they have to have to widen Precinct Line Road. She stated the road is already torn up. Mr. Tucker stated the zoning has no effect on repair to the road. Mr. Royston stated there would be some escrow involved, but doing something to the road now is out of the question Ms. Dodd asked what effect does these requests have on her property. Mr. Tucker said "none". Ms. Dodd asked who pays for the water and sewer. Mr. Tucker stated the developer pays for it. He said the developer puts in the streets and water and sewer and then sells the lots to builders. Ms. Dodd asked what sort of time frame are we talking about. Mr. Tucker stated he was not sure, it could be one to five years. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. ¿ 12. PZ 86-62 APPROVED Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 86-62. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. · r~ ~ , I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 13 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 15. / / / 13. PZ 86-63 APPROVED 14. PZ 86-64 PZ 86-64 APPROVED RECESS BACK TO RDER 86-65 ( Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-63. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Tony Avanzini to rezone Tract 3A2, David Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, from its present classification of AG Agriculture R-2 Single Family. This proper located at the northeast corn Eden Road and Everglade Dri Chairman Bowen opened t Public Hearing and called fo those wishing to speak in favor 0 this request to please come forwar . Mr. Avanzini c e forward. He said they would 1- e to build some homes here. Chairm Bowen called for those wish- g to speak in opposition to this re est to please come forward. ere being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-64. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen called a recess at 8:36 P. M. Chairman Bowen called the meeting back to order at 8:48 P. M. with the same members present. ¿- Request of Delbert Stembridge, Trustee to rezone Tract 3, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located at the northeast corner of Starnes Road and Douglas Lane. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I- I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas November 10, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-62 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO 0-1 . REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 36 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. R\J AI r a Enclosures cc: t~r. Rodger N. Line, City r·1anager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development .1- Zoni ng Revi ew PZ 86-62 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I· I I I I I Ie I . - ORDINANCE NO. 1428 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-62 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to 0-1. ALL that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the W. C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of that same tract conveyed to Jack L. Cates etux J. J. as recorded in Volume 6762, Page 2407, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point at the southeast corner of said tract conveyed to Jack L. Cates etux J. J., said point being on the west right-of-way line of Precinct Line Road (a public right-of-way); THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes 58 seconds West along the south boundary line of said Cates tract, 259.10 feet to a point; THENCE North parallel with the east boundary line of said Cates tract, 168.55 feet to a point on the most easterly north boundary line of said Cates tract; THENCE South 89 degrees 19 minutes 41 seconds East along said most easterly north boundary line, 159.11 feet to a point on the said west right-of-way; THENCE South along said west right-of-way line, 167.7 feet to the place of beginning and containing 1.00 acre, more or less. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I , ...,. Page 2 This property is located on the west side of Precinct Line Road, north of the proposed Wilson Lane. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. -~/Î If! ~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION p~ COr ~"J#'-~=F:-f~~~ SECRETfRY PLANNI~ AND:ZÓ~OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-62 IS HEREBY REZONED. THIS DAY OF -- MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: 1/12/87 Council Meeting Date: Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to Rezone PZ 86-63 Tract BBlA, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266 and Agenda Number: a Portion of SE1A, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182, from AG to R-2 Ordinance No. 1429 This Zoning Application is presented on the vacant tract of land located on the west side of Precinct Line Road north of the proposed extension of Wilson Lane to L.D. Lockett Road. The tract is 7.0 acres in size. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential. The applicants propose to develop the tract into single family lots in conformance with the R-2 District criteria. I In the layout submitted with the application the proposal is to develop two tiers of lots with a center residential street. The applicants have shown that this proposed layout is compatible with the adjacent R-3 property which they currently have in the platting process. . RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-63 requesting rezoning on Tract 8B1A, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266 and a portion of Tract SE1A, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182 from AG to R-2 be approved. I I I . I ~ ~ I Bonds (GO/Rev.) I ~,.L)~~ ~~/M¿/J/e4r~ I Departmen ead Signature ~City Manager I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM/' - Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I·) e 1 I 1 ~......... Ijl I If ' : I · ..., ía~S11-~ i;.2·~-j# . ~202 ~--:---r! C-I 1254 AG pa. ~,,-~ 1- ÂI:r 1b O-J 0-1 0-1 AG f' I Page 11 ~ p & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( Ie I I Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together, but voted on separately. 12. PZ 86-62 Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract SE1A, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to 0-1 Office District. This property is located on the west side of Precinct Line Road, north of the proposed Wilson Lane. I I I 13. PZ 86-63 Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture to rezone Tract 8B1A, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, and a portion of Tract 5E1A, W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located west of Precinct Line Road, north of the proposed Wilson Lane. I I Ie Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. I Owen D. Long, Engineer and part owner, came forward. He stated they need this piece of property to give an outlet to Precinct Line Road. He said it is presently zoned AG and they are requesting 0-1 Office District on the corner with R-2 on the back. Mr. Long stated they plan to reconstruct the existing building for a sales office. He stated they have an outlet on Davis Boulevard, but need one on Precinct Line Road. I I I I Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. _¿- I I f Marjorie Dodd, 8125 Precinct Line Road, came forward. She said she needed some questions answered. She asked about them refurbishing the house at 8662 Precinct Line Road to an office building. I )---.. , I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 12 ~ p & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( Mr. Tucker stated that if granted 0-1 zoning, it would be office zoning unless they requested another change. Ms. Dodd asked what size the residential zoning would be. Mr. Tucker said the houses would be a minimum of 1600 square feet with 9000 square feet lots. Ms. Dodd asked how much right of way would they have to have to widen Precinct Line Road. She stated the -~_// road is already torn up. Mr. Tucker stated the zoning has no effect on repair to the road. Mr. Royston stated there would be some escrow involved, but doing something to the road now is out of the question Ms. Dodd asked what effect does these requests have on her property. Mr. Tucker said "none". Ms. Dodd asked who pays for the water and sewer. Mr. Tucker stated the developer pays for it. He said the developer puts in the streets and water and sewer and then sells the lots to builders. Ms. Dodd asked what sort of time frame are we talking about. Mr. Tucker stated he was not sure, it could be one to five years. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. -¿. 12. PZ 86-62 APPROVED Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 86-62. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I il I I I I I f I Page 13 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 13. PZ 86-63 APPROVED 14. PZ 86-64 PZ 86-64 APPROVED RECESS ER 86-65 ( Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-63. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Tony Avanzini to rezone Tract 3A2, David Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, from its present classification of AG Agriculture 0 R-2 Single Family. This proper y is located at the northeast corn of Eden Road and Everglade Dri e. Chairman Bowen opened t Public Hearing and called fo those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forwar . Mr. Avanzini c e forward. He said they would 1- e to build some homes here. Chairm Bowen called for those wishi g to speak in opposition to this re est to please come forward. ere being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-64. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen called a recess at 8:36 P. M. Chairman Bowen called the meeting back to order at 8:48 P. M. with the same members present. Request of Delbert Stembridge, Trustee to rezone Tract 3, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located at the northeast corner of Starnes Road and Douglas Lane. -~- I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( ~ KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas November 10, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS lONING CASE PZ 86-63 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 36 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. aJ t(J, R\JA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development :4-~ . Zoning Review PZ 86-63 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I ORDINANCE NO. 1429 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-63 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. ALL that certain or parcel of land situated in the W.C. Newton Survey, Abstract 1182 and the S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion pf that same tract conveyed to Jack L. Cates etux J. J. as recorded in Volume 6762, Page 2407, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being further described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point at the southwest corner of said tract conveyed to Jack L. Cates etux J. J.; THENCE North along the west boundary line of said Cates tract, 339.6 feet to a point; THENCE South 89 degrees 19 minutes 41 seconds East along the most westerly north boundary line of said Cates tract, 771.5 feet to a point; THENCE South along the most northerly east boundary line of said Cates tract, 167.7 feet to a point; THENCE South 89 degrees 19 minutes 41 seconds East along the most easterly north boundary line of said Cates tract, 260.39 feet to a point; THENCE South 168.55 feet to a pint on the south boundary line of said Cates tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes 58 seconds West along said south boundary line, 1031.90 feet to the place of beginning and containing 7.00 acres, more or le~s. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I , . Page 2 This property is located west of Precinct Line Road and north of the proposed Wilson Lane. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. ¿~~~~ S~Y PLANNI~ 14m - ZONING 'f0MMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-63 IS HEREBY REZONED, THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Planning and Development Department: ubject: - Council Meeting Date: Request of Tony Avanzini to Rezone Tract 3A2, David Moses Survey, Abstract 11~U trom Ab to K-L Ordinance No. 1430 1/12/87 I I Agenda Number: PZ 86-64 This Zoning Application is presented on the existing residential tract located on the northeast corner of Eden Road and Everglade Drive. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. The subject property is 0.95 acres in size. The applicants stated intent is to subdivide the property to create additional lots from the tract. I I Due to the configuration of the subject property the most logical layout of the proposed lots will be two additional lots facing Everglade Drive with one lot continuing to face Eden Road to support the existing residence. The development of the subject property will require that the applicant participate in the required improvements to Eden Road including the dedication of additional right of way and the improvements to the street adjacent to the subject property. II RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-64 requesting rezoning on Tract 3A2, David Moses Survey, Abstract 1150 from AG to R-2 be approved. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ ~9_BUdge~0~ ~ º~~ -I.::::::?f-L ~~P:-:;:;'~~~ignature #,Ci y Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 · '-'-~""'~"<' -...~~~-~ C-I 1196 1'1."11'\ ~"" __."""" t j '1. .f," 2° Aði Tø £-t APe' ".. 4-" "" I-I R-3 1090 I / I I I I " I ' \ \, \ , \ , \ " , " \ " \ -t-r,... r<\ AG R-3 lAG I-I SU I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I - I I Page 13 ~ p & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 13. PZ 86-63 APPROVED 14. PZ 86-64 PZ 86-64 APPROVED RECESS BACK TO ORDER 15. PZ 86-65 ( . . Mr. approve PZ 86-63. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Tony Avanzini to rezone Tract 3A2, David Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located at the northeast corner of Eden Road and Everglade Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. -=-/' Mr. Avanzini came forward. He said they would like to build some homes here. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-64. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen 8:36 P. M. the meeting back M. with the same ¿- equest of Delbert Stembridge, Trustee to rezone Tract 3, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located at the northeast corner of Starnes Road and Douglas Lane. I I- I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I - I I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas November 10, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-64 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-2 . REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 62 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ad (JJ r 4f RvJ AI r a Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development .! Zoning Review PZ 86-64 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I - I I ORDINANCE NO. 1430 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-64 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. BEING a portion of the David Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, Tarrant County, Texas, and described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin in the east line of Eden Road 450.0 feet South and 15.0 feet South 89 degrees 28 minutes East from the northwest corner of said Moses Survey; THENCE South 89 degrees 28 minutes 48 seconds East, 376.96 feet to· an iron pin for corner; THENCE South generally with a fence, 105.0 feet to an iron pin in the north line of Everglade Drive; THENCE South 89 degrees 00 minutes West, generally with a fence, and the north line of said street, 377.0 feet to an iron pin at the intersection of the east line of Eden Road with the north line of Everglade Drive; THENCE North with the east line of Eden Road 115.0 feet to the point of beginning and containing 0.9519 acres of land. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I Page 2 This property is located at the northeast corner of Eden Road and Everglade Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. f}~ æ ,4~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~£2~¿~~ SECRET~Y PLANNI~ONING OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-64 IS HEREBY REZONED. THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: 1/12/87 Council Meeting Date: Subject: Request of Delbert Stembridge, Trustee, to Rezone Tract 3, John Condra Survey, Abstract Jll, from AG to R-2 Ordinance No. 1431 PZ 86-65 Agenda Number: This Zoning Application is presented on the vacant tract located on the northeast corner of Starnes Drive and Douglas Lane. The tract is 10.02 acres in size. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential. The applicants stated intent is to develop the property into single family lots in conformance with the R-2 District criteria. The Staff noted to the Commission that this tract had earlier been submitted for rezoning to R-3 Single Family and was denied by the Commission. In the interim the" property to the north of the subject tract had been rezoned to R-2 Single Family. The subject tract faces the Birdville Independent School District tract across Starnes Road. The development of the subject tract will require that the developers participate in the improvements to Starnes Road which is designated as a two lane Collector Thoroughfare. The City is currently preparing plans for the improvements to Starnes Road. The project will be initially funded through approved Bond Funds. The applicant will be required to provide escrow funds sufficient to cover his participation in the street costs. In addition, Douglas Lane, adjacent to the subject tract is designated as a two lane Collector Street. The applicant will be required to participate in the improvements to Douglas Lane along the frontage of the subject tract. RECOMMENDATION: I ~ I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-65 requesting rezoning on Tract 3, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311 from AG to R-2. , Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Oth Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director I Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I r I Page 13 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 13. PZ 86-63 APPROVED 14. PZ 86-64 PZ 86-64 APPROV BACK TO ORDER 15. PZ 86-65 ~ Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-63. This motion w seconded by Ms. Flippo and the otion carried 4-0. ' Request of Tony Avanzini 0 rezone Tract 3A2, David Moses urvey, Abstract 1150, from s present classification of Agriculture to R-2 Single Famil~ This property is located at the ortheast corner of Eden Road and verglade Drive. Chairman wen opened the Public Hearing called for those wishing to sp k in favor of this request to pIe e come forward. -/ Avanzini came forward. He said they would like to build some homes here. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-64. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen called a recess at 8:36 P. M. Chairman Bowen called the meeting back to order at 8:48 P. M. with the same members present. -~! Request of Delbert Stembridge, Trustee to rezone Tract 3, John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located at the northeast corner of Starnes Road and Douglas Lane. I Page 14 ~ p & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 I. I I I I I I I PZ 86-65 APPROVED . 16. PZ 86-66 I I I I I I I f I ( Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Jackey Fluitt with Stembridge & Associates, came forward. He stated that when they purchased the property, . they agreed to a deed restriction of 1700 square foot houses. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 86-65 with the stipulation of 1700 square foot houses. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Debra Jackson to rezone Tract 3Al, William Cox Survey, Abstract 321, from its present classification of AG Agricult C-1 Commercial. This pro ty is located at the northwe corner of Davis Boulevard and urner Drive. Chairman Bow opened the Public Hearing called for those wishing to sp in favor of this request to pI se come forward. Ms. Jackson came forward. She stated this property is located at the corner of Turner and Davis Boulevard. She said it is an older residence she would like to turn into Commercial. ¿. Mr. Tucker stated the structure would have to meet the zoning ordinance and the building code. He stated that once this request is granted, it will be non-conforming and could not be used as a residence. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas November 20, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-65 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-2 "REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 50 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning r~ap as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~w,~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development _.l Z 0 n i ng Rev i ew PZ 86-65 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I ~ ORDINANCE NO. 1431 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS· BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-65 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. BEING a 10.02 acre tract of land situated in the John Condra Survey, Abstract 311, Tarrant County, Texas and being described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a steel rod 1,306.42 feet south of the north boundary line of said John Condra Survey and being in the east right-of-way line of County Road #3051 (Douglas Lane); THENCE North 00 degrees 03 minutes West along the east R.O.W. line of County Road #3051 (Douglas Lane) for a distance of 675.37 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 59 minutes East along the South line of a 2 acre tract for a distance of 210.0 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 01 minutes 59 seconds West along the east line of said 2 acre tract for a distance of 358.14 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 54 minutes 32 seconds East along the South line of a 5.10 acre tract for a distance of 284.59 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 06 minutes 15 seconds East along the West line of a tract of land for a distance of 1033.14 feet to a point for corner and being the north R.O.W. of Starnes Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 59 minutes West along the north R.O.W. line of Starnes Road for a distance of 495.56 feet to the place of beginning and containing 10.02 acres, more or less. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -- I I . .. Page 2 This property is located at the northeast corner of Starnes Road and Douglas Lane. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. ß~~~ tl ~~ CHKIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~ ~£:2~~ SECRET RY PLANNI ZONINGjCOMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-65 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY ·. I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: Council Meeting Date: 1/12/87 Request of Debra Jackson to Rezone Tract 3Al, Wm. Cox Survey, Abstract 3l1, trom AG to c-l Ordinance No. 1432 PZ 86-66 Agenda Number: This Zoning Application is presented on the existing residential tract located on the west side of Davis Boulevard north of Turner Drive. The tract is 1.4 acres in size. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to C-1 Commercial. The applicant proposes to capitalize on the improvements to Davis Boulevard and the future extension of Hightower from the west by proposing to develop the subject tract into future commercial property. No submittals were included with the application which would indicate how the property is to be developed. In the vicinity of the subject tract all of the existing frontage tracts along Davis Boulevard with the exception of one tract immediately north and west of the subject tract are currently zoned C-l Commercial. The proposed extension of Hightower Drive along the north boundary of the subject tract is included in the Thoroughfare Plan as a four lane Collector Street. The applicant will be responsible for the portion of the proposed street adjacent to the subject tract. In addition the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation is designing an improvement project for Davis Boulevard which will be initiated in the near future. The applicant will be required to participate in that project to the extent of the costs of the adjacent curb and gutter and storm drainage. The City should require that the applicant execute a covenant for voluntary assessment of these costs when the project is completed. RECO:MMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-66 requesting rezoning of Tract 3Al, WM. Cox Survey, Abstract 321 from AG to C-l. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available _ Operating BUdget.. _ == -"~ ~~ ~~ ~~~::~~ature -(r7 City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Fmance Director Page 1 of 1 ... , '.... - ¡' /' '1 .,,-zo AôÞ Tø 2-t AP. ".- 4-" ,J" R-3 1090 / / I , I ' I " r I \ \, \ , \ , \ ' \ ' \ \ \ \ , ..........C n AG I-I SU R-3 .. I Page 14 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I -- /' 16. PZ 86-66 I I I I I I I Ie I ( Of . Chairman Bowen opened the Pub c Hearing and called for tho wishing to speak in favor of th· request to please come forward. Jackey Fluitt th Stembridge & Associates ame forward. He stated that whe they purchased the property, -. they reed to a deed restriction of 17 square foot houses. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 86-65 with the stipulation of 1700 square foot houses. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Debra Jackson to rezone Tract 3Al, William Cox Survey, Abstract 321, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to C-1 Commercial. This property is located at the northwest corner of Davis Boulevard and Turner Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing ~nd called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Ms. Jackson came forward. She stated this property is located at the corner of Turner and Davis Boulevard. She said it is an older residence she would like to turn into Commercial. :t-! . Mr. Tucker stated the structure would have to meet the zoning ordinance and the building code. He stated that once this request is granted, it will be non-conforming and could not be used as a residence. II . . Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I Page 15 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Beth Davis, 7720 Aubrey, came forward. She asked if there was just one Commercial District. Chairman Bowen stated there were two, C-1 and C-2 and Ms. Jackson is asking for C-I. / Ms. Davis asked if this zoning would allow for a shopping center. ~/ Mr. Tucker said it would, but the size of the property would not be large . enough. Ms. Davis asked how large it was. Ms. Flippo stated it is 1.4 acres. Ms. Davis said it was about the size for a 7-11 store. Mr. Tucker stated that was correct. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. PZ 86-66 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-66. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next requests would be he~rd toget voted on separately. 17. PZ 86-67 Request of C es Schreiner Nelson to rezone act 2, S. Richardson Survey, ract 1266, & Tract 1, Alexander Hood Survey, Abstract 683, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located on the west side of Keller Smithfield Road, north of Bursey Road. 2 ... . I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I /: \. ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINE ERS I Fort Worth- Dallas November 21, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-66 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO C-1 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 61 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating ,should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. We would note that a portion of the north end of this proposed zoning will be occupied by the future Hightower Drive right-of-way. Hightower is proposed to be a C4U Thoroughfare with a 68-foot right-of-way width. A portion or all of the 68-foot right-of-way may pass through the north end of the proposed rezoning area. The exact location of the future right-of-way relative to this property which is being rezoned should be determined by the owner or developer's surveyor or engineer when the property is replatted, subject to review and approval by the City Staff. f0vflt) UJ. ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R\~A/ ra Enclosures cc: r~r. Rodger N. Line, City ~1anager . Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development ~! Zoning Review PZ 86-66 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I ORDINANCE NO. 1432 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-66 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to C-1. ~- BEING a tract or parcel of land out of the William Cox Survey. Abstract 321, situated in Tarrant County. Texas, and being described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a railroad spike in the westerly right-of-way line of F. M. Highway #1938 with its intersection with the centerline of County Road #3004 (Turner Street), for the southeast corner of the tract herein described; THENCE South 58 degrees 00 minutes West along the centerline of said road, 192.50 feet to a 60 D nail for corner; THENCE North 07 degrees 14 minutes East at 30.07 feet passing a ~ inch iron pin in the approximate northerly R.O.W. line of said road, in all 393.34 feet to a ~ inch iron pin in a fence line for corner; THENCE South 86 degrees 12 minutes East generally along a fence, 226.20 feet to a ~ inch iron pin for corner in the westerly R.O.W. line of said F. M. Highway; THENCE South 22 degrees 17 minutes West along said westerly R.O.W. line, 295.26 feet to the point of beginning and containing 1.400 acres of land. · .. I I . e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Page 2 This property is located at the northwest corner of Davis Boulevard and Turner Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. C '~~;) D ZONING COMMISSION þ7/7 P/7· I' ~~~d~~ SECRE~Y PLANN~D ZONING)COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-66 IS HEREBY REZONED, THIS DAY OF - MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY ·' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development .epartment: Council Meeting Date: Subject: Request of Charles Schreiner Nelson to Rezone A d N b Tract 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract lz66, and lract-~e,n a urn er: Alexander Hood Survey, Abstract 683 from AG to R-2 Ordinance No. 1433 1/12/87 PZ 86-67 This Zoning Application is presented on a portion of the vacant property located on the southwest corner of Smithfield Road and Wilson Lane. The subject tract is one of four parcels of property belonging to the same owner and is part of a coordinated rezoning request on the overall tract. This particular parcel is the most southerly of the four parcels and is adjacent to the existing Fair Oaks Addition. The subject tract is 22.0 acres in size. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential. The subject tract faces Smithfield Road and is contiguous with the portion of the existing Fair Oaks Addition which is currently R-2 Single Family with an 1800 square foot building minimum. The development of the subject tract will require that the adjacent portion of Smithfield Road be improved to a four lane Collector Street in accordance with the Thoroughfare Plan. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-67 requesting rezoning on Tract 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266 and Tract 1, Alexander Hood Survey, Abstract 683 from AG to R-2 with the stipulation that the residence size minimum be set at 1800 square feet. , Finance Review Source of Funds: It Bonds (GO/Rev.) - Operating Budget _ I ~the ~ ~ -~~O, ~) J Department d Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I ~ I I I I I I ·tt I I I I I AG p-z, 8h -,8 . )'J4, 10 R·~ A" 1-2ß-8~ 13B~ .. .. ¡~: C"2 1320 AG AG R- 1322 Pz. g4,.. I..., . , .-.' Âf.!¡ To ~ - -z.. At P.. 1- .8- Be.. I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I '- I I Page 15 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 PZ 86-66 APPROVED 17. PZ 86-67 ( Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in oppositio to this request to please come forw d. Beth Davis, 7720 Aubre~ came forward. She asked if there w just one Commercial Distric . Chairman Bowen C-I and C-2 d for C-I. were two, is asking asked if this zoning would a shopping center. ~- Tucker said it would, but the size of the property would not be large . enough. Ms. Davis asked how large it was. Ms. Flippo stated it is 1.4 acres. Ms. Davis said it was about the size for a 7-11 store. Mr. Tucker stated that was correct. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-66. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried -4-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next four requests would be heard together, but voted on separately. Request of Charles Schreiner Nelson to rezone Tract 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, & Tract 1, Alexander Hood Survey, Abstract 683, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located on the west side of Keller Smithfield Road, north of Bursey Road. , .~. I Page 16 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( Ie I lB. PZ B6-68 WITHDRAWN Request of Charles Schreiner Nelson to rezone Tract 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, & Tract 1B, Alexander Hood Survey, Abstract 683, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-3 Single Family. This property is located west of Keller Smithfield Road, north of Bursey Road. I I I I I I ~ 19. PZ 86-69 Request of Charles Schreiner Nelson to rezone Tract 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to C-2 Commercial. This property is located at the southwest corner of Keller Smithfield Road and Wilson Lane. 20. PZ 86-70 Request of Charles Schreiner Nelson to rezone Tracts 1A & 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from their present classifications of AG Agriculture and R-2 Single Family to R-8 Single Family Detached ,Zero Lot Line. This property is located on the south side of Wilson Lane, west of Keller Smithfield Road. I il I Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. I I Wes Shaver, 1250 N.E. Loop 410, San Antonio, TX, came forward to repres~nt the owners. He showed a map of the proposed Wilson Lane and the proposed land use from Highway 377 to Precinct Line Road. He said half of Wilson Lane is in Keller and is under construction. Mr. Shaver said it is to be a 6 lane divided thoroughfare going east and west. He said it would have quite a bit of traffic. Mr. Shaver said he met with some of the homeowners. He said he was asking for R-2 next to Bursey and Keller Smithfield Road. He said north of Continental Trail he had previously asked from AG to R-3, but due to some 2' I ~ I I '. . I Page 17 ( p & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I '- I I ( objections in Fair Oaks Addition to the 7500 square foot lots and 1400 square foot homes he removed it from the agenda and resubmitted it for R-2 zoning. Mr. Shaver stated that across the creek at the corner of Keller Smithfield and Wilson he has asked for 6 plus acres (9 including the right of way) from AG to C-2 Commercial and then south of Wilson Lane, north of the creek he has asked for from AG and R-2 to R-8 zoning. He said there is 7 some concern about the large amount of R-8, but the cost in developing Wilson Lane and the cost of the drainage and channel would justify a higher density. Mr. Shaver stated the traffic would be on Wilson Lane and these houses would not be readily seen by people to the south. He stated it would be in the Keller School District. Mr. Shaver said the drainage proposal meets all of the requirements of FEMA, and should help take the flow out and help some of the people to the south. Mr. Shaver said the R-8 zoning has a minimum of 4000 square foot lots, but they intend to have lots 60 by 100 (6000 square feet), and a minimum of 1400 square feet houses instead of the required 1200 square feet houses. He submitted a letter which he read to the Commission: "Gentlemen: Regarding our proposal Zoning Case for 70.93 acres of R-8 Single Family Zoning on Wilson Lane, we would like to made the following suggested restrictions: Typical Lot Size- 60' x 100'/6,000 square foot average; Minimum Structure Size-1400 square feet; Proposed Density-5 units per acre. In addition to these restrictions, we intend to screen the proposed acreage with permanent masonry or wood and masonry fencing along Wilson Lane and along the boundary between this property and proposed C-2 zoned property (as indicated on the Conceptual Plan). ...! \ . I Page 19 ( p & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I ( Mr. Frisque stated that the developers had a sincere desire to work with the homeowners. He said the homeowners are in favor of some R-2, opposed to R-3, and have no problem with the C-2 Commercial, but we had no problem with the Commercial a year ago. Mr. Frisque said item #20-70.93 acres of R-8 is a problem. He said the Conceptual Plan looks good, and they have good intentions, but looks is in the eye of the beholder. Mr. Frisque stated that Mr. Barfield is trying to back out of his part in Wilson Lane; ~-' the City Master Plan calls for a 4-lane road. Mr. Frisque stated the homeowners have been working very close with Keller. He said Keller is considering changing some of their high density to single family. Mr. Frisque stated that there is low density single family across from the requested R-8. He said the homeowners are opposed to the R-8. He said none is developed in this city. Mr. Frisque said the homeowners suggest they go back to the drawing board and find something more desirable. Richard Hudler, 7313 Continental Trail, came forward. He stated that his property lies directly south of the proposed R-8 zoning. He said the houses are 2000 square feet plus. Mr. Hudler said if was zoned for 1400 square feet houses, that is what they would build. Beth Davis, Aubrey Lane, came forward. She said she did not feel the best use of the land is R-8. ¿ Tom Duer, 7312 Londonderry, came forward. He asked if the acreage could be put in the agenda. He said it would help them. Dr. Duer said everyone says they want to build a high quality project, but some don't. I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I Page 20 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( Dr. Duer said he and Mr. Tucker are on the Charter Commission and the plan to request a name change for North Richland Hills, but they might need to change the quality of building in North Richland Hills. He said builders don't want to build quality homes in North Richland Hills. He said a friend of his had his house appraised and the appraiser said if it had been 40 feet over in Keller it would have appraised for $25,000 more. Dr. Duer said the developer say they just can't afford to build high quality in North Richland Hills, but a half a mile north they plan to build an 18 hole golf course. He told the Commission to stick to their guns and require high quality. He said the R-2 adjacent to the R-2 request is 1800 square foot minimum. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker said he felt the request for R-2 should be the same as the property adjacent to it. Chairman Bowen asked Mr. Shaver if they would agree to the 1800 square foot requirement. Mr. Shaver said it is bounded on the east by Keller Smithfield Road. Chairman Bowen stated that there was R-l zoning across the road. Mr. Shaver said for the Commission to make the decision. ~ 17. PZ 86-67 APPROVED Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-67 with deed restrictions of 1800 square foot houses. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. 18. PZ 86-68 Withdrawn. I Ie I I I I I I I it I I I I I I '- I I KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas November 20, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONltJG CASE PI 86-67 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-2 -REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 33 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~NW~~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RvJA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development 4,.1 Zoning Review PZ 86-67 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 , . I I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1433 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-67 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. COMMENCING at a steel rod found in a fence for the northwest corner of the Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, said point being in the east line of the John Edmonds Survey, Abstract 457, said point also being the southwest corner of the James C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 139; THENCE South 89 degrees 14 minutes 25 seconds East with the centerline of a 60 foot R.O.W. recorded in Volume 4396, Page 649, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas at 1039 feet and continuing with the fenced south line of Wilson Lane (County Road #3076) in all a distance of 1682.32 feet to a steel rod found at a fence corner; THENCE crossing said Wilson Lane, North 00 degrees 24 minutes 19 seconds West 26.8 feet to a point in the north line of said road for a corner; THENCE with the north line of Wilson Lane, the line common to said Richardson and Bradford Surveys and the City Limit line common to Keller and North Richland Hills, North 89 degrees 50 minutes 50 seconds East 2008.3 feet to a 1 inch steel rod found, said point being at the intersection of the north line of said Wilson Lane with the approximate centerline of Keller-Smithfield Road; THENCE with said Keller-Smithfield Road (County Road #3076) approximate occupied centerline. South 00 degrees 16 minutes West, a distance of 1095.00 feet to the point of beginning; THENCE South 00 degrees 16 minutes West containuing with Keller-Smithfield Road, a distance of 1503.71 feet to a point for a corner, said point being in the north line of Bursey Road as platted in Volume 388-194, Page 2, of the Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 53 minutes 53 seconds West, a distance of 164.17 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; THENCE along the said curve with a radius of 740.00 feet and a central angle of 20 degrees 25 minutes 53 seconds, a distance of 263.88 feet to a point for a corner; I I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 THENCE North 20 degrees 34 minutes 17 seconds West, a distance of 158.88 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 23 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 546.00 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE South 82 degrees 52 minutes West, a distance of 125.86 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 40 minutes West, a distance of 49.93 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 14 minutes 49 seconds East, a distance of 34.01 feet to a pint for a corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 55 minutes West, a distance of 125.00 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 23 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 805.39 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE ~rth 82 degrees 45 minutes 07 seconds East, a distance of 800.54 feet to the point of beginning and containing 22.00 acres, more or less, of property. This property is located on the west side of Keller Smithfield Road, north of Bursey Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONI G COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. - SECRETA~Y PLANNIN~ING MMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-67 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF ............... MAYOR ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY . . I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: 1/12/87 Council Meeting Date: ubject: Request of Charles Schreiner Nelson to Rezone Agenda Number: PZ 86-69 Tract 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract llóó, trom A~ to c-~ Ordinance No. 1434 This Zoning Application is presented on the third parcel in the coordinated rezoning request on the southwest corner of Smithfield Road and Wilson Lane. The particular parcel is located directly on the corner of the two streets. The subject tract contains 9.7 acres. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to C-2 Commercial. The applicants have not indicated a proposed use for the tract. They suggest that the commercial designation should be given due to the subject tract location at the intersection of two major streets. The Staff noted to the Commission that northwest corner of the intersection in the City of Keller and the southeast corner in North Richland Hills on the Green Valley Track Site have previously been zoned for commercial use and the tract' on the northeast corner has a favorable recommendation for commercial zoning in Zoning Application PZ 86-58. As stated, the subject tract is located on the intersection of Smithfield Road, a proposed four lane Collector Street and Wilson Lane, a proposed six lane divided Arterial Thoroughfare. The applicants will, as a condition of development, be required to participate in the improvements to each of these streets. In addition, the south boundary of the tract is the channel of Little Bear Creek. This channel must also be improved as a condition of development. e RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-69 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266 from AG to C-2. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) e~BUdget~ -JÀ ~ -, . Departme' t -ead Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I B1e ... I I I I I I I liie I I I I I t' . . .. 076 ~~......", -- I ¡ . R -3- 1500 AG pzs, -,8 Atr·To R-3 A'# 7-Zß-ø, , ¡ I I I I ! I I ,. ... 01 ¡..: I Ie I I I I I I I Ie, I I I I I I I Ie I }, Page 15 ~ p & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 PZ 86-66 APPROVED 17. PZ 86-67 ( Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in oppositio to this request to please come forw d. Beth Davis, 7720 Aubre~ came forward. She asked if there w just one Commercial Distric . Chairman Bowen C-I and C-2 d for C-l. were two, is asking asked if this zoning would a shopping center. _"'--°' /' o!'" ~ -- Tucker said it would, but the size of the property would not be large · enough. Ms. Davis asked how large it was. Ms. Flippo stated it is 1.4 acres. Ms. Davis said it was about the size for a 7-11 store. Mr. Tucker stated that was correct. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. . . Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-66. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried '4-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next four requests would be heard together, but voted on separately. Request of Charles Schreiner Nelson to rezone Tract 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, & Tract 1, Alexander Hood Survey, Abstract 683, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located on the west side of Keller Smithfield Road, north of Bursey Road. . . ~ .r I Page 16 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( Ie I 18. PZ 86-68 WITHDRAWN Request of Charles Schreiner Nelson to rezone Tract 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, & Tract IB, Alexander Hood Survey, Abstract 683, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-3 Single Family. This property is located west of Keller Smithfield Road, north of Bursey Road. I I I 19. PZ 86-69 Request of Charles Schreiner Nelson to rezone Tract 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to C-2 Commercial. This property is located at the southwest corner of Keller Smithfield Road and Wilson Lane. - . I I 20. PZ 86-70 Request of Charles Schreiner Nelson to rezone Tracts lA & 2, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from their present classifications of AG Agriculture and R-2 Single Family to R-8 Single Family Detached ,Zero Lot Line. This property is located on the south side of Wilson Lane, west of Keller Smithfield Road. I Ie I I Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. I Wes Shaver, 1250 N.E. Loop 410, San Antonio, TX, came forward to represent the owners. He showed a map of the proposed Wilson Lane and the proposed land use from Highway 377 to Precinct Line Road. He said half of Wilson Lane is in Keller and is under construction. Mr. Shaver said it is to be a 6 lane divided thoroughfare going east and west. He said it would have quite a bit of traffic. Mr. Shaver said he met with some of the homeowners. He said he was asking for R-2 next to Bursey and Keller Smithfield Road. He said north of Continental Trail he had previously asked from AG to R-3, but due to some .J . I I I I Ie I I Page 17 ( P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I "- Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( objections in Fair Oaks Addition to the 7500 square foot lots and 1400 square foot homes he removed it from the agenda and resubmitted it for R-2 zoning. Mr. Shaver stated that across the creek at the corner of Keller Smithfield and Wilson he has asked for 6 plus acres (9 including the right of way) from AG to C-2 Commercial and then south of Wilson Lane, north of the creek he has asked for from AG and R-2 to R-B zoning. He said there is- some concern about the large amount of R-B, but the cost in developing Wilson Lane and the cost of the drainage and channel would justify a higher density. Mr. Shaver stated the traffic would be on Wilson Lane and these houses would not be readily seen by people to the south. He stated it would be in the Keller School District. Mr. Shaver said the drainage proposal meets all of the requirements of FEMA, and should help take the flow out and help some of the people to the south. Mr. Shaver said the R-8 zoning has a minimum of 4000 square foot lots, but they intend to have lots 60 by 100 (6000 square feet), and a minimum of 1400 square feet houses instead of the required 1200 square feet houses. He submitted a letter which he read to the Commission: "Gentlemen: Regarding our proposal Zoning Case for 70.93 acres of R-B Single Family Zoning on Wilson Lane, we would like to made the following suggested restrictions: Typical Lot Size- 60' x 100'/6,000 square foot average; Minimum Structure Size-1400 square feet; Proposed Density-5 units per acre. In addition to these restrictions, we intend to screen the proposed acreage with permanent masonry or wood and masonry fencing along Wilson Lane and along the boundary between this property and proposed C-2 zoned property (as indicated on the Conceptual Plan). _./ -, ). I Page 19 ( P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Frisque stated that the developers had a sincere desire to work with the homeowners. He said the homeowners are in favor of some R-2, opposed to R-3, and have no problem with the C-2 Commercial, but we had no problem with the Commercial a year ago. Mr. Frisque said item #20-70.93 acres of R-8 is a problem. He said the Conceptual Plan looks good, and they have good intentions, but looks is in the eye of the beholder. Mr. Frisque stated that Mr. Barfield is trying to back out of his part in Wilson Lane; ~ the City Master Plan calls for a 4-lane road. Mr. Frisque stated the homeowners have been working very close with Keller. He said Keller is considering changing some of their high density to single family. Mr. Frisque stated that there is low density single family across from the requested R-8. He said the homeowners are opposed to the R-8. He said none is developed in this city. Mr. Frisque said the homeowners suggest they go back to the drawing board and find something more desirable. Richard Hudler, 7313 Continental Trail, came forward. He stated that his property lies directly south of the proposed R-8 zoning. He said the houses are 2000 square feet plus. Mr. Hudler said if was zoned for 1400 square feet houses, that is what they would build. Beth Davis, Aubrey Lane, came forward. She said she did not feel the best use of the land is R-8. ~ Tom Duer, 7312 Londonderry, came forward. He asked if the acreage could be put in the agenda. He said it would help them. Dr. Duer said everyone says they want to build a high quality project, but some don't. . .' . I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 20 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( Dr. Duer said he and Mr. Tucker are on the Charter Commission and the plan to request a name change for North Richland Hills, but they might need to change the quality of building in North Richland Hills. He said builders don't want to build quality homes in North Richland Hills. He said a friend of his had his house appraised and the appraiser said if it had been 40 feet over in Keller it would have appraised for $25,000 more. Dr. Duer said the developer say they- just can't afford to build high quality in North Richland Hills, but a half a mile north they plan to build an 18 hole golf course. He told the Commission to stick to their guns and require high quality. He said the R-2 adjacent to the R-2 request is 1800 square foot minimum. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker said he felt the request for R-2 should be the same as the property adjacent to it. Chairman Bowen asked Mr. Shaver if they would agree to the 1800 square foot requirement. Mr. Shaver said it is bounded on the east by Keller Smithfield Road. Chairman Bowen stated that there was R-1 zoning across the road. Mr. Shaver said for the Commission to make the decision. ¿ 17. PZ 86-67 APPROVED Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-67 with deed restrictions of 1800 square foot houses. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. 18. PZ 86-68 Withdrawn. - ~ I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I I I I I_ I Page 21 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 ( 19. PZ 86-69 APPROVED Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 86-69. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. 20. PZ 86-70 DENIED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to deny PZ 86-70. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo. Chairman Bowen said he agrees with this motion. He said there might be room for some R-8 in the area, but not this much, there is room for improvement. The motion to deny carried 4-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:30 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I ~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( r '- KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas November 21, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-69 REVIEW LETTER, ZON I NG FROf1 AG TO C-2 . REF. UTILITY SYSTEt·1 GRID SHEET NO. 24 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~~w, ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R\vA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development - . Zoning Review PZ 86-69 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I i II I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1434 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COL~CIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-69 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to C-2. COMMENCING at a steel rod found in a fence for the northwest corner of the Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, said point being in the east line of the John Edmonds Survey, Abstract 457, said point also being the southwest corner of the James C. Bradford Survey, Abstract 139; THENCE South 89 degrees 14 minutes 25 seconds East, passing the centerline of a 60 foot R.O.W. recorded in Volume 4396, Page 649, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas at 1039 feet and containuing with the fenced south line of Wilson Lane (County Road #3076) in all a distance of 1682.32 feet to a steel rod found at a fence corner; THENCE crossing said Wilson Lane, North 00 degrees 24 minutes 19 seconds West, 26.8 feet to a point in the north line of said road for a corner; THENCE with the north line of Wilson Lane, the line common to said Richardson and Bradford Surveys and the City Limit Line common to Keller and North Richland Hills, North 89 degrees 55 minutes 50 seconds East, a distance of 1223.36 feet to the point of beginning; THENCE North 89 degrees 50 minutes 50 seconds East continuing along the north City Limits line a distance of 785.00 feet to the point for corner; said point being at the intersection of lthe north line of said Wilson Lane with the approximate center line of Keller-Smithfield Road; THENCE South 00 degrees 16 minutes West, along the centerline of said Keller-Smithfield Road, a distance of 630.00 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE South 85 degrees 16 minutes West, a distance of 610.00 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 16 minutes East, a distance of 400.00 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE North 32 degrees 18 minutes 59 seconds West,_ a distance of 329.24 feet to the point of beginning and containing 9.70 acres, more or less of property. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 This property is located at the southwest corner of Keller-Smithfield Road and Wilson Lane. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1986. Av1 æ¿t~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~~ri2~..e;/ ~ ~~. '--v-·..._-~~~.. ?"~ - -. " SECRET~Y PLANNING-AND-zONING)COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-69 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: - Council Meeting Date: Request of Harston Gravel Company for Replat A d N b ot Lots .)J:<A & ')KlA, 1SJ.oCk. J, l.ndustrl.al Park Add11:1on gen a urn er: 1/12/87 Subject: PS 86-54 This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lots 5RA and 5R2A, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition. The property is located on the southwest corner of Wuliger Way and Browning Court. The purpose for the proposed plat is to realign the existing lot lines along current ownership lines. The occupant of the existing Lot 5R2, H & M Foods, wishes to expand their existing operations and have purchased additional property acquired from the adjacent lot. All of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the replat of Lots 5RA & 5R2A, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition as submitted. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Oper . g Budget o er Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITE . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 R-7-MF c,\ U 126" '" . <fo. ... .- 1-2 1194 I I I 1-2 I R-7-MF C-2 I C-2 C-2 1164 I I :¡ " ..:~ .... ,.V· I Ie I I I I I I I' Ie I I I I I I I - I I Page 2 ~ P & Z Minutes December 11, 1986 PS 86-50 TABLED ./6 ~-~ /' 3. PS 86-54 PS 86-54 APPROVED 4. PZ 86-53 5. PZ 86-54 ( There being no one wishing to the Chairman called for those to speak in opposition to thi to please come forward. There being no one the Chairman cl Hearing. Chai n Bowen stated that the replat c~~tes a split in the zoning of the lot. He said the additional area is presently zoned OC Outside Commercial and a residence is not allowed in OC zoning. .- ,/ _:- /' Mr. Tucker made the motion to table PS 86-50 until such time as a zoning request is submitted for the property. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion to table carried 4-0. Request of Harston Gravel Company for replat of Lots 5RA & 5R2A, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 86-54. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next three zoning requests would be heard together, but would be voted on separately. Request of Kenneth C. iteley, Trustee to rezone art'of Tracts IB & 2A, D. Moses vey, Abstract 1150, thei resent classification of ·culture to R-2 Single Family. T· property is located east of Flamingo Estates, north of the railroad. -~. Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee to rezone part of Tracts 1B & 2A, D. Moses Survey, Abstract 1150, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to R-3 Single Family. This property is located east of Eden Addition, north of the railroad. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie ( (', 817 336-5773 Metro 429-8306 M~ cT¥'}C:C¿~ T 1'f1~L AIYl! G~ENRfí!1'f~ December 3, 1986 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Replat, Lots 5R & 5R2, Block 3 Industrial Park Addition Dear Commission Members: /" // _.-// We are in receipt of Don Dietrich's letter regarding the review of this replat. We are in agreement with all three (3) comments of his letter, and we have made the necessary revisions for Items 1 and 2 and resubmitted same to the City for further review. In regards to Item 3, we will have all signatures and notary seals applied to the replat before consideration by the City Council. I I I I I I I Ie I We appreciate the corporation of the staff in the quick review of this subdivision. We understand that it will be on the December 11, P&Z agenda, and we will be in attendance at that meeting in order to answer any questions you may have concerning replat. Very truly yours, TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC. JRP/Il .~ ichard Perkins, P.E. -~- 915 Florence Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( City of j\(órth Richland Hills, Texas ~L ~~ : ,I ~f December 2, 1986 }Iemo to: Planning & Zoning Commission REF: PWM-0047-86 From: Don Dietrich Assistant Director Public Works Subject: Replat, Lots 5R & 5R2, Block 3 Industrial Park Addition This replat is being submitted in order to enlarge Lot 5R2A from 2.5 acres to 4.3 acres. The following comments are offered in regard to this replat. 1. The fire hydrant coverage for the southeast corner of Lot 5R2A will be inadequate until a fire hydrant is actually installed and made operational that is shown on an easement in the northeLly third of Lot 5RA. The fire hydrant does not exist in the field at this time. 2. The right-af-way dedication of Browning Drive at the south end of Lot 5RA is to be thirty-four feet wide however, plats recorded in 1984 and 1985 did not specifically dedicate this thirty-four foot wide right-of-way nor does this replat of Lot 5RA. In order to dedicate the 34' wide right-of-way, that area to be dedicated should be included as being owned by the platter and designated on the face of the plat as being dedicated for street purposes. It is felt that there is no evidence that the right-of-way is not yet formally dedicated as it should be. In July 1985, the developer-owner asked that he sign a covenant to ensure future construction of Browning which appears to be a reasonable request. 3. All signatures and notary seals must be applied to the plat before approval. ¿- Don Dietrich (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 .' ~ I I Department: rSUbject: I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 1/12/87 Request of Ellis-Ellis Associates for ~·lnal. t'l.at ot Lot 1, .!:Slock 2, fl1ghcower Plaza PS 86-42 Agenda Number: This Final Plat Application is presented for consideration of Lot 1, Block 2, Hightower Plaza Addition. The subject tract is located on the southeast corner of Hightower Drive and Rufe Snow Drive. The property is currently zoned C-l Commercial. The purpose for the proposed plat is to subdivide the tract for development. The applicants have stated their intent to build a strip shopping center on the site and they have commitments from Safeway Grocery and Eckerd Drugs to occupy the proposed center. In the Staff and Engineer's review of the proposed plat several issues were raised for Commission consideration. ~ ~ A) Rufe Snow Drive is designated as a future six lane divided Arterial Thoroughfare. The required Right of way for this level of street is 110 foot minimum. The applicants have shown the dedication of additional right of way on the plat to provide their portion of the needed right of way. The configuration of the dedication assumes, as the City has in other plats in this area, that the City of Watauga will provide a portion of the right of way from its developers. Although full width construction of Rufe Snow cannot be accomplished by the applicant, he should be required to provide the improved street adjacent to his project or to enter into a covenant with the City agreeing to pay his portion of the costs at such time as the street is improved. B) Hightower Drive adjacent to the subject tract is designated a four lane undivided Collector Street requiring a right of way of 68 feet. The applicants have made the necessary right of way dedication on the plat to provide their portion of the street width. However, the full width of needed right of way is not accomplished since the property to the north is not developed. Under the terms of the Subdivision Ordinance the applicant can be made responsible for that additional right of way to accomplish the full street width. I I I I I I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) I Oper ing Budget Ie 0 er I I The applicants wish to simply place funds in escrow against future construction on the street. Considering that the applicants property will have major frontage on Hightower it would seem appropriate that he construct the street in that area. If full width construction is not feasible the applicant should be required to construct the south two thirds of the street pavement adjacent to the subject property. C) The major issue involved in the proposed development of the subject tract is the design and construction of the storm drainage facilities, both on-site and off-site. The applicants have proposed from the start of the project to construct a storm water detention basin which would capture the run-off from the developed site in order to protect the downstream property off-site from storm water damage. The Staff noted to the applicant that no provisions currently exist within the Ordinance which would allow this type storm drainage design. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable ¡(~ · Ci y Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of ? I I I I I The Planning and Zoning Commission is presently reviewing a proposed reV1S10n to the Subdivision Ordinace which would allow the use of retention/detention storage as an alternative storm drainage design. Should this Ordinance revision be approved the earlier submittal by the applicant would be adequate for retaining the development's on-site run-off. However, the Staff has noted that the design submitted did not take into account inflow drainage from north and west of the site. Also the construction of Hightower Drive will involve a drainage area which cannot be directed to the on-site pond. I I The Staff also noted that the proposed detention pond location is not within the area proposed to be platted. Additional drainage easements will be required from the unplatted property. RECOMMENDATION: I The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 2, Hightower Plaza with the stipulation that the drainage design be brought into compliance either with the current Ordinance criteria or by waiting until such time as the Ordinance revisions regarding retention/detention are made and bringing the Engineering Plans into compliance with that Ordinance. I It is also recommended by the Staff that the applicant be required to construct the portion of Hightower Drive adjacent to his property. I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS AG A AG "v '6 ;¡'T ow I I f 1 I Page 3 p & Z Minutes January 8, 1987 Ie I I I I I PS 86-57 POSTPONED I 2. PS 86-42 I ~ I I I I I I PS 86-42 APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS I Ie I Mr. Hannon stated he requests considerable recommendation. Chairman Bowen stated he felt he had not had enough time to study this report to be able to vote on it tonight. He said he felt the commission should put it on hold for further study. Chairman Bowen stated he felt this type of retention should be used as a last resort. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to hold this report for further study. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Ellis-Ellis Associates for final plat of Lot 1, Block 2, Hightower Plaza Addition. Mr. Hannon came forward. He said he did not want his plat to be denied. He said he takes no exception to the engineer's comments and he requests it be sent on to the City Council for approval subject to the approval of an ordinance. Chairman Bowen said that Mr. Hannon should get with the City Staff and read the report and see if he could live with it. Mr. Hannon said he had been working with the City Staff for several months and understood that an ordinance was to be drafted the first of January to comply with his requested use. Chairman Bowen stated there are some parts of the report that the Commission wants to review further. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 86-42 subject to the drainage plans be worked out or a drainage ordinance be approved or other acceptable plan be approved. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. I ( ( City of j\(ðrth Richland Hills, Texas Ie I I December 29, 1986 I REF: PWM-0055-86 Memo to: Planning & Zoning commission I From: Don Dietrich Assistant Public Works Director I Subject: PS 86-42 - Lot 1, Block 2 Hightower Plaza I This plat has been considered earlier but no approval has been given yet because of the concept of storm water detention and the fact that there are no current ordinances that address this concept. I City Engineer Richard Albin has prepared an ordinance which will allow the detention concept for the review of the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council. Ie I Mr. Albins comment letter dated October 22, 1986, address the items of concern for the plat. I //\, /"'~ -- { /¿ ( ~ /;~-_7~~- 'f, . V 1-1 r-.....--~~P~/ /' /' ·b~ Z---· Don Dietrich I I I I I Ie I (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 76118 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I {annan Engineering, ,(..:;. HoveMber 6~ 1986 Mr. Richard Roy.ton City of North Richland Hilla P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Lot 1~ Block 2 Hightower Plaza (Lot 1, Block 81. Foster Village) PS 86 - 42 Dear Richard: I aa in receipt of Richard Albin's letter dated October 22, 1986. We have the following replies to hi. comments: 1.1 Not an action ite.. 1.2 Done. 1.3 Done. 1.4 Acknowledged. 1.5 The o£fsite drainage easement as shown on Sheet 7A has been requested froM Mr. Ike Harris. the owner o£ Windsor Park Addition. I have his verbal assurance that this is acceptable, but don't know if we can get the documents signed prior to setting the P&Z aggenda. W. would request that this proJect be allowed to be heard by the P&Z even if the signed document is not in hand. The 15 foot off-site util- ity ease.ent is on property owned by the developer of this proJect and they have agreed to dedicate the utility easeaent concurrent with the plat. 1.6 Staff function. 2. Staff function. 3. The developer intends to escrow his prorata on Hightower. 4. Staff function. 5.1 Acknowledged. 5.2 Acknowledged. 5.3 Acknowledged. 5.4 Acknowledged. 5.5 Done. 5.6 Done. 5.7 Done. 5.8 Done. 1245 Southridge Court Suite 204 Hurst, Texas 76053 817 282-8186 (Metro) 817 268-6600 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Mr. Richðrd ~~y!ton ~ N~¥~mR~f ~; t~~R-~Q:~ 5.9 Done. See note on all grading sheets. 5.10 Not an action ite.. Please note that we propose an 8 £oot high fence around the detention basin. 5.11 We plan to install an 8 foot chain link fence with three rows of outward facing barbed wire at the top. There will be one double six foot gate for access and maintenance. 5.12 We propose to install signa with the following t.ext: DANGER .. DANGER .. DANGER STORM WATER DETENTION POND FLASH FLOOD AREA This pond can fill with stora water in less than one ainute DO NOT ENTER DANGER .. DANGER .. DANGER 5.13 Done. 5.14 Done. 5.15 We do not believe that a buffer should be required. 5.16 Not an action item. 6. The developer will submit an agreement speci£ying how he will participate in the downstream drainage. 7. Acknowledged. 8. Our plans show that 16" PVC water line is subJect to approval by the city. 9. Done. 10. Done. 11. We believe tha the patch we propose will prove supe- rior to replacement in kind of the existing sec- tion. We will modify it i£ instructed by the city staff. 12. Acknowledged. We have changed the designation on the plat to Hightower Plaza, Lot 1, Block 2 per a discussion between ourselves. I trust that these replies and our plan revisions are satis- factory. If you have any questions, please feel free to call ae. Sincerely. HANNON ENGINEERING. INC. ~ <..... ~ I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I - I I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas October 22, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-841, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS HIGHTOWER PLAZA (FOSTER VIL.), LOT 1, BLOCK 81, FIr~L PLANS (DETENTION STOR.), PS 86 - 42, GRID MAP 67 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 Please see our review comments regarding the preliminary plans by letter dated January 7, 1986. 1.1 Item 1 -- Detention storage is proposed by the developer instead of downstream channel improvements (see additional comments regarding detention storage in item no. 5 below). 1.2 Item 2 -- Surveyor's seal and certification on Final Plat is required. 1.3 Item 3 Owner1s telephone number should be on plat. 1.4 Item 8 Water and Sewer line prorata payment requirements. 1.5 Item 9 -- Offsite drainage easement as shown on sheet no. 7A should be obtained by developer and furnished to the City. Also 15-foot off-site drainage easement shown on plat should be provided. 1.6 Item 11 -- Regarding right-of-way dedication on Rufe Snow, the developer is providing an additional 16.5 feet of right-of-way which will increase the right-of-way width on Rufe Snow to 93.5 feet along the frontage of this proposed development. An additional 16.5 feet is required from the Watauga side of Rufe Snow. We would suggest that the Watauga Planning Commission and City Council be consulted regarding their commitment to future right-of-way widening as required to provide the full 110 feet 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( HIGHTOWER PLAZA (FOSTER VIL.) Subdivision Review Letter continued for a P6D Thoroughfare. 2 utility Companies should be consulted to determine if additional easements are required to service this proposed development. 3 The Developer should be required to escrow his prorata share of future curb and gutter, paving and drainage improvements on Hightower Drive, or construct such improvements at this time. If Hightower improvements are proposed then plan and profile data should be furnished to the City for review. 4 The location of the proposed curb cuts on Rufe Snow should be approved by the Public Works Department. Also, are the three proposed curb cuts on Hightower acceptable? 5 Regarding the developer's proposed use of detention storage to reduce the stormwater runoff from this development to levels comparable to existing runoff stormwater quantities, we would refer you to the material presented in our report dated October 9, 1986, on "Detention Storage Guidelines" which you may wish to consider adopting. The following comments are based on provisions which exist in other citie's ordinances, and other sources noted, covering detention storage that are applicable to this proposed development: 5.1 The owner shall keep the detention storage structure under private ownership and be held accountable for the protection of the general public from any safety or health hazards related to the proposed facility. 5.2 The owner or developer shall accept full responsibility for maintaining the detention storage structure. 5.3 The existing and future owners of the land containing the proposed facility shall meet the above obligations forever. 5.4 The proposed project shall comply with all Federal, State and County laws pertaining to temporary impoundmend of surface water including the design, construction and safety of the impound structure. 5.5 The bottom of the detention storage pond should be sloped toward the outlet. 5.6 Concrete riprap should be installed below all infow and outflow pipes to minimize erosion. October 22, 1986 PS 86 - 42 PAGE 2 I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I ( ( HIGHTOWER PLAZA (FOSTER VIL.) Subdivision Review Letter continued 5.7 An impervious central core should be constructed in the embankment to be made of a compacted clay material. 5.8 The cutoff trench in the embankment should be excavated to impervious subsoil or bedrock. 5.9 The contractor should maintain the detention basin to design dimensions throughout construction of the development site. 5.10 Fencing should be required around the detention basin in the following cases: 5.10.1 A maximum depth of water in the basin for a 10 or 25 year design storm is greater than 3D-inches. (This would not apply since the lOa-year depth is only 25.2 inches). 5.10.2 The side slopes of the basin are steeper than four (4) horizontal to one (1) vertical. (This would not apply either if the side slopes are 5:1). 5.10.3 The time to empty the basin is longer than 3 hours. (Some water does remain in the pond after 180 minutes (3 hours) based on the calculations presented in sheet 8 for the 39.6 cfs outflow hydrograph table). 5.10.4 The Planning and Zoning Commission or Council determines that the public safety would be endangered if the basin is not fenced. 5.11 Fencing shall be galvanized chain link with a minimum height of four (4) feet and be provided with a gate opening of twelve (12) feet in width unless the Public Works Department recommends other standards based on special circumstances. 5.12 The detention pond should be posted with signs that warn of the possible danger to the safety of trespassers. 5.13 Outflow pipes shall be provided with child-proof screening. 5.14 The detention storage pond should be lined with an impervious soil or other material. (The developer is proposing to line the bottom with asphalt or concrete). 5.15 Landscaping should be provided adjacent to the detention facility so as to provide a buffer between the facility and the adjacent development if required by the Commission or Council. October 22, 1986 PS 86 - 42 PAGE 3 I I_ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( HIGHTOWER PLAZA (FOSTER VIL.) Subdivision Review Letter continued 5.16 Other design and construction provlslons are recommended but are not listed here because this proposed detention pond design is in compliance with them (See "Detention Storage Guidelines" report) . 6 We would note that if the proposed detention storage plan is approved only as a temporary drainage solution, then the developer should agree to participate in downstream drainage channel improvements at such time that construction of downstream channalization becomes feasible. The approved method of participation should be included in the City-Developer Agreement. 7 The developer is proposing to construct a 16-inch water main in Hightower in accordance with the Master Plan. We are presently preparing plans for extension of the water main eastward to Douglas Lane. If the City project is constructed first before the developer's project and the entire water line is constructed from Rufe Snow to Douglas, then the developer should be required to pay his prorata share of the new 16-inch water main along the frontage of this proposed development. 8 The proposed 16-inch line in Hightower should be constructed with ductile iron pipe with polyethylene wrapping unless the Public Works Department approves PVC pipe (which we understand at this time has not yet received AWWA approval for the 16-inch diameter size). 9 The tapping valve on the existing 16-inch water main in Rufe Snow should be reduced to a 14-inch valve since concrete steel cylinder pipe cannot be tapped with the same size tapping valve -- the next lower size should be used. 10 The Public Works Department prefers the use of cast-in-place sanitary sewer manholes in lieu of pre-cast types. 11 The type of pavement replacement cut for tapping the 16-inch water line in Rufe Snow should be approved by the Public Works Department. The developer is proposing a 2-inch HMAC pavement replacement on 8-inches of 2:27 concrete as shown in the detail on sheet 14. We would note that the existing pavement in Rufe Snow along this proposed development site is 8-inches of HMAC on 8-inches of lime stabilized subgrade. 12 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific October 22, 1986 PS 86 - 42 PAGE 4 I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( HIGHTOWER PLAZA (FOSTER VIL.) Subdivision Review Letter continued variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~OAJ) W r t2a-:- RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development October 22, 1986 PS 86 - 42 PAGE 5 I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 7, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-841, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOSTER VILLAGE ADDITION, LOTS 1 THRU 6, BLOCK 81, PRELlt:1INARY PLAT, PS 85 - 100, GRID MAP 67 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The drainage system downstream from this proposed development site into which the developer is planning to discharge runoff from this site does not have sufficient capacity to handle additional stormwater without flooding. The underground storm drain in Chapman Drive and the drainage channel located along the west side of the Richfield Addition were not designed to handle runoff from this development area. The Drainage Master Plan proposes to discharge runoff from this site eastward along a future drainage ditch or underground storm drain located along the north side of the Richfield Addition site. This future storm drain system would continue eastward to the Calloway Branch channel. Negotiations with the downstream property owner, Mr. Billy J. Graham, will be required to obtain permission to construct this off-site channel across his property. We would note that the developer is required only to provide a la-year capacity in the off-site channel. When the property on which the off-site ~ channel is located develops, the owner of that property will be required to concrete line the channel and upgrade its capacity to a lOa-year frequency design, in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance. If Mr. Graham does not grant permission to construct the off-site channel across his property, we would consider recommending approval of an on-site retention storage facility designed to reduce the lOa-year runoff from this property to existing discharge levels (prior to development of the site). Detention storage calculations should be provided by the Deve10per1s Engineer if this plan is proposed. Please see the attached preliminary sketch which shows a schematic of the proposed off-site channel prepared for the Drainage Master Plan. 2 A surveyor1s seal, certification, and signature should be affixed to the final plat. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Subdivision Review Letter continued FOSTER VILLAGE ADDITION 3 The owner's telephone number should be noted on the plat. 4 The block number should be changed. Block 51 has already been platted in Foster Village, City of Watauga. 5 We would note that adequate fire hydrant coverage protection has not been provided for these lots based on the 300 foot radius requirement for commercial zoning. Four small areas within the proposed development site are outside the limits of the 300-foot radius circles of coverage. The proposed location of some of the fire hydrants may be shifted to provide full coverage, or additional fire hydrants may be required. 6 In accordance with County requirements, property corner monumentation should be noted on the final plat. 7 Water and sanitary sewer services and sizes should be shown on the platting. 8 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of the existing 16-inch water line in Rufe Snow Drive, if this has not already been paid. We estimate the prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for one half of an equivalent 8-inch water line for a total length of 1316.5 feet. Also, the owner should be required to pay his prorata share of the existing 10-inch sanitary sewer line in Hightower Drive. We would estimate the prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for one half of equivalent 8-inch sewer line for a total length of 1106.49 feet. 9 Easements for the off-site drainage and off-site sanitary sewer should be obtained and transmitted to the city. 10 Easements for storm drains on Lots 3 and 6 should be shown on the plat. 11 The existing right-of-way width of Rufe Snow is about 77 feet along the west of this property. The Thoroughfare Plan designates Rufe Snow Drive as a future P6D Thoroughfare, 6 lane divided, lID-foot minimum right-of-way, and Hightower Drive is designated as a future C4U Collector, with a minimum 68-foot right-of-way width. Technically, the developer is required to obtain the additional right-of-way from the adjacent property owners, unless this requirement is waived by the City Council. The owner should be required to escrow his prorata share for future construction of Rufe Snow Drive and Hightower Drive, or construct such improvements at this time. Detailed plans and profiles of any such thoroughfare construction such be provided for review. , ~ 12 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for January 7, 1986 PS 85 - 100 PAGE 2 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Subdivision Review Letter continued ( FOSTER VILLAGE ADDITION all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. RI RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development ..; !II ..¡ January 7, 1986 PS 85 - 100 PAGE 3 I I Ie I I I I Ie I I I I I I . .' I . ~. t'M ~ ?: I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Planning and Deve¡opment Department: 1/12/87 - Council Meeting Date: Subject: Request of Ike Harris Company for a Variance to A d N b SO 87-1 Section 6.3(a) of the Sign Ordinance Regard1ng the l.ocatq~~ a urn er: of Real Estate Project Signs. I I Ike Harris & Company is developing the Windsor Park Subdivision located on the north side of Chapman Road east of Rufe Snow Drive. The project is zoned and is being constructed as a Townhome/Garden Home development. The applicants wish to place a temporary project sign on the vacant property north of the Mobil Service Station advertising their development. However, that tract is zoned C-l Commercial. Section 6.3(a) of the Sign Ordinance currently specifies that a development such as this may have one off-site project sign, which must be located in the same zoning district as the project. The Staff denied the application on the basis of this section. The applicant is requesting that the City Council approve a variance to the Ordinance allowing the off-site sign. I I I RECOMMENDATION: I It is Staff's opinion that the Ordinance is clear and specific regarding this request for variance. However, in the proposed general revision to the Sign Ordinance which was provided to the City Council for their comments recently this issue was dealt with and the proposal was made that project signs, such as the applicant is requesting, be permitted in the Commercial districts without reservation and that no off-site project signs be permitted in residential districts. It is recommended that the City Council consider the general revision to the Ordinance as an avenue to allow the request rather ~than granting a variance for this single instance. I Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available ~gferating Budget _ ~) Þ?1A_.O~)~ ~~It4r}iuØ ~ ~ Depar~~:~ature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director I Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 12/~f/'~ r; : r/, -' S-c. c. -,.;:¡. 7. N. f<, ~(/~ II /1-//1, f 4. &--4- a. c c. --¡" r 7t,...J" AJ¿> 1____ Q .r eI . to t, 7 IA""~ r ~ ~ c.~ S ì/"t!..? G r; ..".J - ~ 11ft I~IJ;'J- · T ' J, .... q 1/4. .., , a jJ t:. t4.. , t> >1, t} o'r ,AI I. ~ '..... IIJ 0 I . f /-L4 6-- t I. L.... r/, 1·1 ð AI 7' .c- Q !-e,p J e..- I> f T~tL ~'rr ~-c....:r; 'w, . þ 7Í-t- ~ì17 ~4.fIC'% I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I e .. ... I CITY OF NORTH RICHL'\¡\1> HILLS SIGN PER}IIT APPLICATIO~ ANn CHEC~IST PER..'1IT Nuz.œElL TYPE OF SIGN_ J~~ U--/1-()~ "'Alr _nAT~ IY,/::J~~£ NAl1F; OF APPLICA."lT/BusnlESS r ~~ ".¡, J. i..s J.. 2ð . _ _ ADDREss I t... T ..6~__ Iv PHONE t:.. ~ _ I :2 ~:::¡ . .... LOCATION OF SIGN CI... SIGN LOCATION ON LOT~~ ~ '0 4" '17". ~, ~ . o NAl1F; OF CONTRACTOR ~ II~þI S S-, AI ADDRESS 3 70 7: 410,. ~ PHONE ?~ / .C,!,~~ I ~D1'H OF LOT FACL."lG QUALIFY:n:G STREET_ ~_ - -.. -:..r .- ¿JØ. .. C~r- '1ft! SIGN TAI<nlG UP PARKING SPACE(S) YES_ _~1O~ BLOCKING FIREL'\¡"lES YES-,- _NO_~STIHATED SIG~ VALUE $~ ~øo PER.'1A..T<1ENT OR BILLBOARD FILnTG FEE $50.00 .p ESTDfATE:) COST ~ - T-JRrTTÐl cmISF:NT 'OF THE OWNER OF THE BUILDING STRUCTURE OR LAND TO w1iICr¡ OR ON ~ICH THE STRUCTURE Is TO BE ERECTED OR SIGN TO BE PAINT~. YES NO ---...; ---- . o 1;0 h'//.,,;. ******************~************************~****************~************** -. .. . '. ..: ...... . THE tmDEI\.SICNF:D ACREE To CONFOR..'i TO ALL APPLICABLE SIc:; ORDnIM1CE i11i)Ol, 1-24-83, AND OTHER. ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF UORTH ~ICHL;,.'lD HILLS, AND ASSUNE ALL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR ER.E TI:lG THIS S N. SIC:MTURE OF APPLICA.....T DATE SIC:ŒD~ APPROVED BY______ ;~APPROVED DATE________ PLr.\SE ATT.\CH A.'lY ADDrTIO~'\l. r:;FO~!"\TrO:l TO THE BAC~ OF T!'rs .-¡ FOIt.'1. -------- I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I il I I I Ie I m 4900 CIRCLE RIDGE DRIVE FT. WORTH. TEXAS 761 14 (817) 332·441 1 ~~~r( 9en¿ /// DEVELOPMENT OF INCOME PRODUCING PROPERTY REAL TOR" January 5, 1986 Mr. Richard Royston City of N. Richland Hills 7301 ~.E. Loop 820 N. Richland Hills, TX 76118 P\.e: Sign - // Dear Richard: This letter serves as our agreement to the Ike Harris Co., acting thru their-agent Dick Blackard, to place a sign on our commercial property at the corner of Rufe Snow'& Chapman, advertising homes to be sold in the residential development platted as Windsor Park. In accordance with the request on file" with you from the Ike Harris Co., we request that you allow the sign and issue the appropriate pernit for its display. Sincerely, JOINT VENTURE lei ~ I ßO®œg, I ~ ' I I I I, I I Ie I· I . IS Ff: From Gr~Je 7õ Tor Of Sì3f1. · ¡v1.Ð.O. WOod 'fà'le/s - s{b/eJ -priMed- pa'"fed. I .;. SIGN FlfcES 8"x 2.¥/N2. ~.F+' 7üiö./ £ac-4 Side. I I I I Ie I NDSOR ~ ~ GEORGE THOMAS HOMES '.. . . '".. ,.,.. t> - ~ \ ...~ I I.,. I , ). .'. :... ,I . ~ .' i . ~.!. .:"';'~ ( - þ'" ~ ~ . . .; r ~ ~ ,t . . . . , .. . , ~ , ", ~ . . , .·t ~ '.' .. L '" " ~~t~:~:~ _ .. 41 ",-' .. . ~: ·f:~.'.~: ~ ;" .' .' .....¡. ), :. ,..". 3709 ROSS AVE. FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76106 (817) 625-9991 I Ie I' ..; I I I I I I Ie I --------.....- - ---- I I I I I ELLIS 8 ELLIS VOL. 7629, PAGE 832 C-I ~I ~~ . s·" o. O(E! II ... ,.' os· r _ __to'.o.ø~~ _I"OO~ C-I )2eÐ'. 1'00' Clt~.~ . . c- 2 , I LT.7 BLK.7 : ~L T. 8 BLK. 7 .~ 19.74568 S. F. ~II 01 045" ~c:.. k: '8.782.52 S.F -, ,0 ".19·'40'-(.- 20'00" Itl 08903 At. J o ) liDO' ~' 'd Cltv 2 ,., ,0 - - O~. _ . ~~~~ :-: -:.=. _ . g- - î,ïoo- - _. '4Þ. .~i' ,It~', .'", . o . _ , I \ S. "-'4 0' ., ~J 10,007" / A 1 9 B rt ~ : I ~. -cuss UMTS' ~ L L . I 4 ~.7'e,f9 ~, LT. 6 BLK, 7 ~ .~ 1.0955 A c: '.. 40,204.47 sr. ~ .~ 0.'230 AC. ~: - C-2 I "2 '" ".,.' 0'- ( C-2 ~ '. "',00 Z .. ~ ~ p.o. 8. LOT 7 P.O.B.....~ LOTe P.O.B. LOT 9 I 1 I I , -I--l i rJ ,. ': ! ~ C-I OAK LAWN DR. LT 5 179004 2 ;, r.. OJ ;: '0' acuss l~"T g _' _ ~~. _ __ 1__ _ _ ~ a: o : N n·1.4~. I 40000 - --iõi"oõ - -r - --.. P.O.B. LOT~ ,l·T 3 .~. B L K 7, 1 '7 4 6 e 4 ~ 1 8 S r 40102 AC, ~ ... 0 '5 .z .eI) .. P.O.B. LOT 3 &IJ ~ :) Q: c-. o º Q '- BLK 7 Itt~.,~ to ~ U <! ü: r- (.f) CD <I >- W ~ ::> (f) z Z <! 2 . ,"'6"'''( ..a..( ;; 1 1 , --j- /6' ·J"L'~ ..TII.'T, II''' . I . I I , I I f., '; ,,-, f j:' ~ ,. ..It( ._..( ~ I , 1 I , .' .~ ~¡ ; ~, ., '~ ARNOLD V. PENT m VOl.8051. PAGE 646 R-6-T ù I· ,... ,0 I~ I , , I ~ -c-.. .. CltV ,_~ ) \ , "l ~O~~:~L['~~ : I . , . '0 o I tl'$STA.LLf\T[ðf\J LOCATlð~ O~1\er: I ~~SU"'þ4lrM4t\ Jði~ Ve~re Arf\Dlct V. Pé!i\t:m:) Developer _POINT OF COMMENCING I ~_~s 2 ~ --1 -.J ~ -- 40000' -', ~ C - 2 If ~ .~! ~: . P. 0.& lDT4 I -·~I , . CHAPMAN ," I . " ". . 3 ," '... .-,.../ , oa \J /¡;....~~' t' "...." c""'.:1 '5999.01 S" I :: ~ :~,~L~;t·:¡ . Ii C-f !: g... P.O.8'~I; II' cm- -.- ,..~ .0. '000'- - -- ~'If .0. ,·.ow CKDlcaT'ON c ~~ ,. ,....... .. V" l' ~~ RD. ((X~8'''OWJ PROP6e'"OW J · \. I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 1/12/87 - Council Meeting Date: Request of Burk Collins Investments for Agenda Number: SO ,ß7-2 Variance to Section 4.1(b) of the Sign Ordinance tor an Additional Ground Sign at Olde Towne Square Center Burk Collins Investments is in the process of developing the Olde Towne Square Center at the northeast corner of Bedford-Euless Road and Strummer Drive. This center is a large two-story strip center containing several tenants on the main lot and one out-parcel lot located directly at the intersection of the two streets. When this lot is developed the building will become the front of the shopping center. The Staff has approved and permitted a ground sign for the overall center. The proposed sign will have as its major emphasis the anchor tenant, Haverty's Furniture. However, some area will be available for the various other tenants. Mr. Collins has now secured an agreement with Pier One Imports to occupy the out-parcel. When the Staff was presented with an application for a separate pole sign for this project the request was denied under the provisions of Section 4.1(b) of the Sign Ordinance. The section states that anyone development is eligible for one ground sign. The Staff had interpreted this section to mean that a shopping center of this type, whether there is a single or multiple buildings, is one development. The applicant is appealing that interpretation and is requesting that the City Council approve the Pier One Site as a separate development. The materials submitted by the applicant indicate that the proposed sign is within the parameters of the Ordinance requirements should the lot be considered as a separate development. RECOMMENDATION: ~ It is Staff's position that the proposed ground sign for Pier One Imports could be approved if the City Council chooses to divorce the out-parcel from the overall center. However, in all other instances where this question has arisen the Staff has been consistent in its interpretive approach and disallowed multiple ground signs. , , Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I 9U/fftwt !¡j~ City Manager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of _ 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I 5228 RUFE SNOW BURK COLLIIVS INVESTlYlENTS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118 . . (817) 498-5489 SUB DIVISIONS . SHOPPING CENTERS . DEVELOPMENTS · WAREHOUSES . REAL ESTATE December 22, 1986 Ms. Jeanette Rewis City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 18609 N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Dear Jeanette; Enclosed, please find a blue line of a pole sign for Pier o"ne Imports at our Old Towne Square shopping center. It is our understanding we would have to get a sign variance to do this. Would you please put us on your January 12, 1987 council agenda? If you need any additional information, please give us a call. Thank you. Very truly yours, 8J(lL; Burk Collins BC/sc Enclosure ---.. 1- ./ -;- -.-:''-~, ; - I.·, ~~ , I I I ~ au ~ ""c< Z&lJt- ~zc.n :t-Lt,. ù..I:Eo a:It:LU ~bJQ cn:;:;O :1ou ~UJ> û)cQ~ ---2: 0 .....t- J Q C LI.J . I.U )( :EXF=U L&JJ-:: =:) &LJ . -< '" N Z ø() Z....JCf)a:::ZZ_)( :c:: tl.." a: 0 ~ ~ ..c; C£O::) ~aO 3~t-'-t-~~1LJ <:ï:-'Qu.J .N ~IILJOCt-",_ o '" t- , ûJ r ({'I ~~~ŠCL~~W CC·OO<,....J% ~~tt:::E<Jb:ZO :E<tt- :EWOt:ï :: u '" ~ it: O~ N .-J...J~<t""N Z --''-J lUV)uJO >-~ZQZ~IODC .Ji,OÞJO..~cQ -I u.JZt- ~+Z<WO~~ :z ..... uJ ="" v. cCcriUJ:zNt-~::3 uJ.. to- 0 Z :z uJ a:: )-Q::-UO:;:W,\J) %)-x: a:~ -Z -..J~lca «LLO LL......::a-IJ...... .CCW-J O¡ùt-l:::-cOac, :zcnLLJ,bJWNÏh <I) :z uJ d) >- 10 Z U) ...1 t-<tUILJ<OO~"'" ~5itUJ~"")-#cn ~ N \...J ci ,. ò w Z {. ~I« . ..J -J . ~I a... ~ - <C2w. ....J I c!) I ~. ' · - c.J -' cJ) ~ -:.. _ _. ~ ~ o -' o ~ ~ -~- t7~~ I~~~ 1t'1l-~~ =. ... .. - 1t IfIIJ - -- 0 - . Ò --- . nJ - ... . ---- . .... - t II 1 ' .. .J-.4 .~ è ,I ,II ~ y.J .-J c( U Úì !>~~ !~, Ii ,;.;,.,, F7;~- ~ r ~c:z ,WO - &1)- ~c.f)o... <O~ UJQ< ~.- :E :c Lu 'ZlLJua:) (.!) 0 ~~~ I- 'Q c ~ (/\ 7 uJ "-1. ILl U~Z..J <a:OO 11.0 Q.. kJli...lU~ -' UJ tf) t- . cOc:C5&ùbJ =>0 ::Z:J . O t(:--I~ .....LLJCCCC Qcf")~< Q&&.JOUZ U-£12 I&J <' "-Z 0.. ~1I...~~:i Z'&.I,JX-c: ;CCa..W%: """c{o......-JU 3CC~Zrn =~"'OO ~u.Jã:ó~ ....J e ..... l.!>. ~~.....J~Q ZQUJcO~ a:~t-L&..JZ aU .0 __ ~ ...--. ~ .....J < ~~~~Q.. -I Ie -I I II il~,~ ~. 1< .ù I u- ti ù ~~ .I -. t I WI I. .' I I I I I ---J I _ -11 I ----" I I . - - - - - ~l;1 - - ~ ...- - ~ ~ ........ - ~ ~ ~-- - . .- - ~ ,~ ........ - -~ =-- -':'- - - "- ......- - ~ s:..:: - - ~r, -. ....-. ~ .- - - - - ..- - ~. ~ ..- ~~ . ../ - - ~ ~ - - ~. ~ ~~ - ,- -- - f ~. ~: z 1-- 0 - ò == ~ ~ ~ ,It == u.J ~. ...J u.J &IoJ c~ .-J l- e( u ! ... û) fI1 '-";: « 1J..J ! ¡. --.- , =:= ~,.: .'.. ::~ .. - "'"" - - t- - ,.-.- - z ~ ~. 0 - - ~ - ~~ Ò :::...:.: :> . ~ , ~ '- u.J U ...J ~ ~ ~ LLJ ~ "'~ ~ ..... - - x: -I. ~ < :::) v d") ~ o· ~" (() ;1 -. ~~ ~ ~ - ~~ ~'oc ~ ~~ ¡ t· - ~lL~~ 'lfJ1 ~. '~ ~DZ ZI¡JO - út- to(,()D... <o~ j U &Xl < I1.J '2~%:'a:1 (!)kJUO ~~I- 'Q C .q- fS') uJ ..J. II.J u¿ ..J <:a:ZO ""0 On.. bJ1L.l&.J~ -'UJ~ , cQcQ5töb.J :> z:) O 0 IX: - -I. .....LLJcC(Q 0cf)~< uz QlUa,O I&JU-J _ to- <~ a... ~LL..«:«~ %'LLJX--c: ;~Q...uJ~ ~cta....JU 3d)~Zrn =cx::V;°o >- u.J å: ci ~ ...J e .... l!;). ;;i ~ ....J ~ C z~UJcO~ cr:,.-u..J &U...~~~ too- ~ ......J <: ~~s:~a.. t . ~,' - ~ '- - - ~ - -- - - - ~ ~ ~~ - - - ~- ~ ~ ";:: ib - - - ~, :1~ ~I~ - - - -- ~ - I l. I ---1... - - - -- ~ - '- _. - I- I I -I.r I ., I······ .- . , ,,- ..... .,. 1 I I 1 Ie I 1 1 I' I ., ~.:·7.. :". <. ",'" , ,~;.~ -"';,/ ", ' : . > . (; " . ".,," ..... . ~. 1 ~, t I I j ; ~~ 1 --- i ,. .(fp- --~---,.. ¥ .. . :.;¡ h ~, ~ '. í / /' . ) . . '\' 1 ,';~j I ì ~ ! 48" l 149 5'Q~ Ft. " J ~ .. .~.' '" //- " ./ . .~ . I 1:1' , . I I - - -- - - - - - - - - -,-, I f , f I J I f , I I I I i' I f I 1 I I I t I t I t I I I J r------------ ------1 i j ¡ iL- ~ ~ ~ I~ -_.. ~ -~ J ' , f ~-~ ~ - f ~ . ~...... I ~ ':"'_ d <- r-, fit tr L-.... f I r-' t I L_.Jf . ---- j- -,- "'- .., ,) PLOT PLAN . I" :: 30,.... 0" i W n N .... . en .. ... f t =- . r ,..... ¡ an an -t 0 0 0 Z I I ..:1 . t· þ . I t· I :.> CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Police Council Meeting Date: 1-12-87 Subject: Interlocal Assistance Agreement for the Greater Dallas- Agenda Number: GN 87-1 Fort Worth Region. Resolution n 87-2 I I I I I The attached Interlocal Assistance Agreement authorizes law enforcement officers from this City and other participating cities to form a mutual aid law enforcement task force to cooperate in the investigation of criminal activity and enforcement of the laws of this State, and to providè additional law enforcement officers to protect health, life and property against riot, unlawful assembly accompanied by the use of force and violence, and during times of natural disaster or man-made calamity. This agreement has currently been ratified by twenty-two cities in the region. City Attorney Rex McEntire has approved this agreement. Reconunendation It is recommended that the City Manager be authorized to execute the attached agreement with other participating agencies. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I ð~ epartment Head Signature · 'City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I -- I -- I I I I ~ I -. I I Resolution No. R7-2 Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The City Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute the attached "Greater Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Law Enforcement Interlocal Assistance Agreement" as the act and deed of the City. Passed and approved this day of t 1986. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I, Ie I GREATER DALLAS-FORT WORTH REGIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT INTERLOCAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to the powers granted under Article XI, Section 5, of the Texas Constitution, and under Article 4413(32c) and Article 999b, Texas 1 Revised Civil Statutes Annotated, counties, municipalities and the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport desire to form a mutual aid law 1 enforcement task force to cooperate in the investigation of criminal activity and enforcement of the laws of this state, and to provide additional law enforcement officers to protect health, life and property against riot, unlawful assembly accompanied by the use of force and I violence, and during times of natural disaster or man-made calamity; 1 Now, therefore, it is mutually agreed by the parties that: -- I I . The following terms shall have the following meanings when used in this agreement: (a) "law enforcement officer" means any policeman, sheriff, constable . or deputy constable, marshal, or deputy sheriff; (b) "police personnel" means any sworn police officer, public service I officer, reserve police officer, sheriff, deputy sheriff, constable, deputy constable, marshal or employee of the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport security force; (c) "member" means a county or municipality which is a party to this I agreement, or the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport; (d) "municipalityll means any city or town, including home rule city I (e) or a city operating under the general law or a special charter; "chief law enforcement officer" means the chief of pol ice of a I muni ci pa 1 i ty, the sheri ff of a county, or the Di rector of Pub 1 i c Safety of the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport; (f) "chief admini strative officer" means the mayor or city manager of a municipality or the county judge of a county. I r I I . The members agree to form and by this agreement do form a mutual aid law enforcement task force, to be known as the Greater Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Law Enforcement Task Force (the "Task Forcell). 1 I I· I I I. Ie I The purpose of the Task Force is to cooperate in the investigation of criminal activity and enforcement of the laws of this state, and to assist in providin9 additional law enforcement officers to protect health, life and property against riot, unlawful assembly characterized by the use of force and violence, and during times of natural disasters or man-made calamity. I I IV. I A member (the "respondi n9 member") other than the Da 11 as-Fort Worth Regional Airport will assign its law enforcement officers to perform law enforcement duties outside the responding member's territorial limits, subject to the responding member's determination of availability of personnel and discretion as to participation, when: A. requested by the chief law enforcement officer, or his designee, of another member (the IIrequesting member") and B. the chief law enforcement officer, or his designee, of I -- I the responding member h,as determined, in his sole discretion, that the assignment is necessary for the investigation of criminal activity and for law enforcement. . V. I A respondi ng member other than the Da llas-Fort Worth Regi ona 1 Airport will assign its law enforcement officers to perform law enforcement duties outside the responding member's territorial limits, I subject to the responding member's determination of availability of personnel and discretion as to participation, when: I A. requested by the chief administrative officer, or his designee, of another member (the "requesting memberll) and I B. the chief law enforcement officer, or his designee, of the responding member, in his sole discretion, has determined 'that the assignment is necessary to protect the health, life and property of the requesting county or municipality, its inhabitants, and the visitors thereto, by reason of riot, unlawful assembly characterized by the use of force and violence, or threat thereof, by three or more persons acting together or without lawful authority, or during time of I r I I' natural disaster or man-made calamity. 2 I I· VI. Ie I A responding member will assign police personnel to perform police protection and detention services outside the responding member's territorial limits, subject to the responding member's determination of availability and discretion as to participation, when: I A. requested by the chief law enforcement officer, or his I designee, of the requesting member, and B. the chi ef 1 aw enforcement offi cer, or hi s des i gnee, of the responding member has determined, in his sole discretion, that the I assignment is necessary to the providing of police protection and detention services within the territorial limits of the requesting member. VI I. I Any request for aid under this agreement shall include a statement of the amount and type of equ i pment and number of personne 1 reques ted, and -- I shall specify the location to which the equipment and personnel are to be dispatched, but the amount and type of equipment and number of personnel to be furnished shall be determined by the responding member's chief law enforcement officer or his designee. . VIII. I Police personnel of the responding member shall report to the requesting member's officer in tactical control at the location to which they have been assigned, and shall be under the command of the requesting member's chief law enforcement officer. I IX. Police personnel of the responding member will be released by the I requesting member when their services are no longer required. X. I The chi ef 1 aw enforcement offi cer of the respondi ng· member, or hi s I r designee, in his sole discretion, at any time may withdraw his personnel or equipment or discontinue participation in any activity initiated pursuant to this agreement. XI. I {' While any law enforcement officer regularly employed as such by a responding member is in the service of the requesting member, he shall be a peace officer of the requesting member and be under the command 3 I I, of the requesting member's chief law enforcement officer, with all the Ie I powers of a regular law enforcement officer of the requesting member, as fu lly as though he were wi thi n the terri torfa 1 1 imi ts of the governmenta 1 entity where he is regularly employed, and his qualifications, respectively, I for office where regularly employed shall constitute his qualifications for office within the territorial limits of the requesting member, and no other oath, bond, or compensation need be made. I XI I. I Each party to this agreement expressly waives the right granted by article 999b, Sec. 5, Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. to request reimbursement for services performed under this agreement. XIII. I Any law enforcement officer or other person who is assigned, designated, -- I or ordered by the chief law enforcement officer of the member which regularly employs him to perform police or peace officer duties pursuant to this agreement, shall receive the same wage, salary, pension, and all other . compensation and all other rights for such service, including injury or death benefits, and workers' compensation benefits, the same as though the service had been rendered within the limits of the member where he is I regularly employed. Moreover, all wage and disability payments, including workers' compensation benefits, pension payments, damage to equipment and I clothing, medical expenses and expenses of travel, food, and lodging shall be paid by the member which regularly employes such persons in the same manner as though the service had been rendered within the 1 imits of the member where he is regularly employed. I XIV. I In the event that any person performing law enforcement, police protection, or detention services pursuant to this agreement shall be cited as a party to any civil lawsuit, state or federal, arising out of the performance of those services, he shall be entitled to the same benefits I t that he would be entitled to receive if such civil action had arisen out of the performance of his duties as a member of the department where he is regularly employed and in the jurisdiction of the member by which he is regularly employed. I l' 4 I I· xv. Ie I Each party to this agreement expressly waives all claims against every other party for compensation for any loss, damage, personal injury, or death occurring as a consequence of the performance of this agreement. XVI. I Third party claims against members shall be governed by the Texas Tort Claims Act or other appropriate statutes, ordinances or laws of the State of Texas. I XVII. I It is expressly understood and agreed that, in the execution of this agreement, no party waives, nor shall be deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims I, arising in the exercise of governmental powers and functions. XVIII. -- I Each party to this agreement agrees that if legal action is brought under this agreement, exclusive venue shall lie in the county in which the defendant member is located, and if located in more than one county, in the county in which the principal offices of the defendant member are located. . XIX. The validity of this agreement and of any of its terms or provisions, as I well as the rights and duties of the parties hereunder, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. XX. I In case anyone or more of the provisions contained in this agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceabilty shall not affect any other provision thereof and this agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained I !I herein. I t XXI. Any party to this agreement may terminate this agreement by giving thirty (30) days written notice mailed by certified mail to the chief law enforcement officer of each party. I r 5 I I· XXII. Ie I This agreement shall become effective between the parties hereto on the day fo 11 owi ng execut i on of the agreement by a pa rty, and sha 11 conti nue in effect until it has been terminated according to this agreement. XXIII. I This agreement may be amended or modified by the mutual agreement of the parties hereto in writing to be attached to and incorporated into this agreement. I XXIV. This instrument contains all commitments and agreements of the parties, I and oral or written commitments not contained herein shall have no force or effect to alter any term or condition of this agreement. I XXV. -- I This agreement shall be executed by the duly authorized official(s) of the party as expressed in the approving resolution or order of the governing body of such party, a copy of which is attached hereto, and this agreement shall remain in effect until rescinded by resolution or order of such governing body and notice of that action is transmitted in writing to all other parties to this agreement. . XXV I. I The parties agree that their collective agreement may be evidenced by the execut i on of an i dent i ca 1 counterpart of thi s instrument by the du ly authorized officer(s) of each participant, and the failure of any member to enter into this agreement shall not affect the agreement between and among the parties executing the agreement. I I I I , 6 I I~ Ie I I I I I -- I . I I I I ~ I Dated and effective as of the ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary I day of , 198ì. CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS, TEXAS BY: Rodger N. line Ci ty Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: Rex McEntire, City Attorney /~~¡¿;- V' BY: 7 I I. I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I City of J{órth Richland Hills, Texas January 8, 1987 REF: ACMM 0126-87 Memo to: Rodger N. Line City Manager From: Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager Subject: Proposed Signs for City Facilities Subsequent to the Sign Committee approval of the proposed signs it was discovered that the Auto Pound was omitted for the sign at the Watauga Road site. After Council approval I will insure this change is made in the bid specifications. 9~ ~ DH/ gp ~ (811) 281-0041/1301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department·. Administration C 1/12/87 ouncil Meeting Date: New Signs for Municipal Facilities GN 87-2 ubject: Agenda Number: In 1985 the City Council appointed Councilman Dick Fisher and Councilman Harold Newman to serve on a sign committee to review and recommend various signs throughout the City. The "Welcome to North Richland Hills" signs were approved and installed throughout the City in the summer of 1986. The committee is now recommending approval of signs announcing the new Community Center, City offices and the activities located at the municipal complex on Watauga Road. The proposed signs are attached and are submitted for full Council approval. The sign at the Community Center also includes an electronic sign that will also be used to announce public meetings and other civic activities. These proposed signs will be in compliance with our Sign Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the designs of these signs. I , I x- Finance Review Acct. Number 15-01-01-6150 Sufficient Funds Available Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other I - {)<AAMA4b~ Department Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 ''; ! \ . _ t.--" j I,· ( , '~ER~S . (0 LOR ¡- : ~~.' . '". . . .. , . ~ . -e - I I 1 . I J I 1 I I 1 I 1 I fI- I ~ to ~~ ,~ . .. . . .. , . '.' k. .. . .: . . . '. ,'. ' i "':'. :'.' . . t. 0." ~ ~ ... '.. ,¡'.' . . . . .. . " I II 14 ~ 4'· t - I I 3 ~ , . /íb PLEX. BAtKCxROUND, - P/T/M CUSTOMER IS COLOR .. .. ........ .~ ~,;;.~~ CÞ . '10 u. " . 8 if . fØ . tit .e .. .. ..Ð .. .t. ~ ~ .8 C ~_ u..O... . ~ e. .. .. · t: ~ Ii .. '011 Cit ~....~. " &. ~8.... ...... · . ~ r¿o. . . ~ JI ..O{ì~~ & ..~ ~ II 0 .e.... 88 ., . U 6 fl. 01. . . 1f ti ... ~ ...... ee · . ..,. ~, G; . . ., " . ". Ow Q . .. . . .... e. ..e.. .. C' If; ~ Q . . ~ . .. ~. 0....... -- - ~ ~ - - - .. ~- ......- -~ .-------. ..,..... -:--- :::.~::-:~~- -.:"~:;,:~:-~ .. ~ :. -', '.... .- ., ,. .. .', )- - ..5 ~ I (Ç@~~lVJ~n1Fv (Ç~~¥~[pJ ~(UJ [ID [bD© [bD [ID~£~W ~£[Rj~@ ~ IR1~©[Rj~~lJD@ffn @(P(PD©[g@ [Rj[g©~~~lJD@Ifn ©[g~lJ~~ ©DlJD©&\[ID[b~,~ - ~® ~ ....---- --- ..---------- -..----- .....-- ----....-- -- M~ hl------ , . 1_ I 1 -. .... . ; ~ . --- -- -- --.---- .. . . *f . . 14-/-4-11 --. t- , ~ . . f I ,. I t If t Ii 3 1/ . ~6 p L~X. BALK CrR-DUN 0 P/T/M CUSTOMER'S COLOR ...-.....-..--...---.........-------------~---.- ..-.._ -- .0- ....~.._.__.. __._.. __ _.~_ . - · r '. - · I · . i ì . . . - , - CC~tt»1T @~ ' ==t . @ Ll~ lhl IR~ n ~ IhJ1J ¿ID 1ffi cd}, IH1 il I1 Il ~ -d ~QlJ~~(Ç~~£[L [ID(UJ[J[L[g)[J~@ I ©OllW -@~[FIO©[g@ · ~@[LD© ~ [Q) [g ~~[R1lr(M] ~ ~ ìJ ~--.-....-..- --------- . -- ----_.._-.----~-- -- ---~ ------------.-- I I I f I .---.~ ..---..... ........ ~. .- . -~-- . --.,~ . Ie , I I I I -I I I I I 1 I I f' I . .~..'4'''''''''''''''' "",-:,"-. _ _...... .............---... ...._._. .._. 4/ - 411 ~ . .. ~". PLE.X. ßAC.K&ROUND P/T/M (USTOME R~S COLOR --¡ · ííß~ @íf . '. .' @1J'~1h1~ncç:IbJn¿IDrrncdJ IJ41i1IJJJ ~ ~ (lJJ ~ ~(Ç~ ~~[b (Ç(Q)~ ~[L~~ FIRE DEPT.OEFICES & TRAINING CENTER ANIMAL S.HELTER .. .'.' ".' CITY'GARAGE & PUBUC WORKS OFFICES FI"RE STATION NO.4, ---, ~ . ... I Department: Personnel _SUbject: Request to Authorize I I I I 1 I __ ~'r:J 0., -.-" ..... ..1_ .... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS the Wyatt Company. C ., M · D 1/12/87 ouncl eetlng ate: a Liability Risk Analysis Study by GN 87-3 Agenda Number: The City Council approved self-insuring the City for General Liability o~ June 23, 1986. The Council also approved self-insuring for Auto and Police Liability on _ October 1, 1986. In conjunc~ion with this self-insured plan, the Council allocated $1,200,000 to establish a plan reserve. In order to determine whether our reserve is appropriate for our plan it is necessary to have a professional Risk Analysis Study of our exposure to liability. The Wyatt Company, Dallas, has proposed to conduct such a study for a fee of $5,200. They have proposed the same study to other area cities to determine the feasibility of establishing a self-insurance pool through a joint financing program with the other participating cities. Our. City's position regarding participation in this liability insurance pool will be evaluated after our Risk Analysis Study is completed. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the City Council approve the following: (1) The Wyatt Company to conduct a Risk Analysis Study at a cost of $5.200; and (2) The transfer of $5,200 from the General Fund Reserve for Contingencies to account 01-15-01-4800 to cover the cost of the study. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~~~ . ~~i/Þ~A~II Department Hea~lgnature {rr City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM x Acct. Number See above reconunendation. s~~ndS Available .~ . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I 1 1 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration 1/12/87 - Council Meeting Date: GN 87-4 Agenda Number: Subject: Appointment to Various Boards/Commissions Due to the recent death of one of the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission it is necessary to fill this vacancy. There is also a vacancy on the Board of Appeals due to the recent resignation of Joe Coulson. Recommendation: Appoint members to the Board of Appeals and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available R~M Department Head Signature Ity Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Administration . 1/12/87 Council Meeting Date: Resolution Supporting Tort Reform, Resolution No. 87-3A d N b GN 87-5 gen a urn er: The Texas Civil Justice League has requested that the City Council pass a resolution supporting tort reform. Recommendation: Approve/Disapprove Resolution No. 87-3. . . Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I -~~/4h~ Department Head Signature City M n ger CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I, m~sølutiøn 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I No. 87-3 Qtittl of Nort1} iRir4lanà Bills WHEREAS, cities throughout the State have experienced dramatic changes in the last several years concerning the availability, cost, and adequacy of public liability insurance; and WHEREAS, such changes have had a profound detrimental impact on the financial condition of cities and have increased the burden on their taxpayers; and WHEREAS, annual increases in the cost of premiums for such insurance by several hundred percent have become commonplace; and WHEREAS, such insurance has, in many instances, become unavailable to Texas cities; and WHEREAS, a major cause of such insurance crisis is the explosion of tort liability and damage awards in this State and throughout the Nation; and WHEREAS, a trend is occurring which has resulted in an increase in the amount of and number of court awards based on factors which are not related to economic loss, including awards of pain and suffering, and awards of punitive damages; and WHEREAS, in 1986, a Texas Court of Appeals upheld an award of punitive damages against a municipality, such case being the first reported case of a Texas Appellate Court upholding an award of punitive damages against a municipality; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills finds that in order to ameliorate the insurance crisis and the financial burden resulting therefrom, and in order to reduce the frequency of excessive court awards, which awards both cause and exacerbate such crisis, it is necessary that the Legislature adopt legislation for the reform of tort law, and adopt legislation affecting the kind and amount of damages that may be awarded against municipalities in Texas; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills that the City Council urgps the Members of the Legislature to adopt legislation for the reform of tort law, and adopt legislation governing the character and amount of damages that may be awarded against municipalities in Texas. I. I- I I I 1 I I 1 . 1 I I I 1 I I I- I Resolution No. 87-3 Page 2 PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of January, 1987. Dan Echols, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Proposed Charter Amendments C 'I M . D 1/12/87 ouncl eetlng ate: GN 87-6 Agenda Number: Attached is a resolution adopted by the North Richland Hills Charter Commission on January 6, 1987. Attached to the resolution is the charter commission message which includes the twelve propositions and a brief description of each proposition. While the Charter Commission has held two Public Hearings on the proposed amendments, it is believed that it would be advantageous for the City Council to obtain direct citizen input on this vital issue. It is proposed that at least one Public Hearing be held, beginning January 26th, 1987. After the Public Hearing(s) are closed, it is proposed that the election be called for August, 1987, on the proposed Charter Amendments, with any changes that the City Council may desire. Recommendation: It is recommended that a Public Hearing on the proposed Charter Amendments be called for the regular City Council Meeting on January 26th, 1987. I I I I Source of Funds: I Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget .e Other . Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Department Head Signature Rl1L~ City Manager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I, Ie I I I I I 1 1 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CHARTER COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The propositions attached hereto and made a part hereof are hereby recommended to the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas for submission to the voters as proposed changps to the Charter of the City. 2. It is further recommended that at a time when the propositions are mailed to the qualified voters that a copy of the attached message of the Charter Commission be mailed at the same time. PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day of January, 1987. APPROVED: Is/Jim Kenna Charter Commission Chairman ATTEST: Is/George Tucker Secretary of the Charter Commission I· Ie I I I I I I 1 Ie 1 I II I 1 I I Ie I CHARTER COMMISSION MESSAGE The Charter Commission of North Richland Hills was appointed on June 23, 1986. It is composed of seventeen citizens of the City charged with the responsibility of reviewing the City Charter and making recommendations for proposed changes in the present Charter. Over a period of seven months the Commission has studied the Charter and has held public meetings and public hearings for citizen input covering each of the proposed changes. The propositions sent to the City Council to be submitted to the voters were recommended for reasons set out below: PROPOSITION NO. 1 This proposition was submitted to give the citizens the opportunity to change the name of the City from North Richland Hills to North Hills. Persons who spoke in favor of this change pointed out that our City has an identity problem because of the close proximity of Richland Hills and the fact that many persons identify the two cities as being one and the same. The shorter name of "North Hills" was the name most often suggested by those persons wishing to have the matter submitted to the voters. The effective date is delayed to allow use of existing office supplies by businesses. PROPOSITION NO. 2 This proposition deals with the budgeting and accounting procedures which are in the present Charter. The proposed changes simplify an outdated accounting procedure that was adopted many years ago. If approved by the voters the new section would require an annual budget on a fiscal year basis to be adopted after public budget hearings and would require the same type of public hearings before the budget could be amended. It also retains the requirement for annual independent audit of city records. PROPOSITION NO. 3 This proposition is needed in order to bring our present Charter into compliance with the state laws governing ad valorem taxation. Many portions of our present Charter are outdated and have been rendered meaningless by the Texas Property Tax Code which was passed by the Texas Legislature. It was felt by the Commission that there was no point in keeping portions of the Charter that could not be followed because of the changes in state law. PROPOSITION NO. 4 This proposal brings our Charter into compliance with state law. It requires competitive bidding for all purchases over $5,000.00 and allows that figure to change if the state statute changes. This would constitute no change in actual practice of the City, since we are governed by state law in this field. e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I 1 ie I I PROPOSITION NO. 5 The adoption of this proposition would increase the size of the Planning and Zoning Commission to seven members. The present Charter calls for five members. This is a busy commission in any fast growing city and the Charter Commission felt that the City is large enough now that it is preferable to have a larger more representative citizens' group available to make planning and zoning recommendations to the City Council. This section also makes the Master Plan of the City a general guideline for all planning and zoning decisions. PROPOSITION NO. 6 This section would require the Municipal Judge to be a licensed attorney and to be a practicing attorney within Tarrant County. The City Council has always appointed a practicing attorney as judge although under the present Charter any resident of the City could be appointed. The city residence requirement was omitted in the proposal by the Charter Commission because often times the position of Municipal Judge is hard to fill and the time could arise where no qualified person within the City would want to apply for the position. This new section would open the field for more qualified persons to apply. This section would also allow the creation of a second court and allow the Mayor, if qualified, to do criminal arraignments. It was felt that a second court could be needed in the future, particularly for arraignments, if the Mayor were not qualified by mandatory schooling. The police are required to bring persons accused of a crime before a magistrate promptly. Often times our one Municipal Judge is busy and cannot be timely used to issue warnings and arraign. PROPOSITIONS NO. 7 THROUGH 12 These propositions all deal with the Civil Service Article of the Charter. The firemen, policemen, and other city employees met to consider needed changes in the Civil Service Article. These six proposed changes (Propositions 7 through 12) are the proposals which received unanimous support of the employee organizations. Many other Civil Service changes were reviewed but the Charter Commission did not submit any of those which had opposition from one or more of the employee organizations. Proposition 7 changes the power of the Commission. and allows it to only recommend policies, procedures, rules and regulations. Proposition 8 deletes Section 8 of Article XVII because the subject matter is covered in Section 2 of the current Charter. Proposition 9 defines those persons who are not classified as those positions filled by direct appointment of the City Manager or City Council. Proposition 10 adds to the testing procedure under civil service. It allows the use of an assessment center exercise as an approved testing procedure for classified positions. I, I_ I I I I I I I I_ I I I I 1 I I I_ I Proposition 11 prohibits involvement in city politics by city employees while on duty. The old section has a universal prohibition against city employee involvement in city politics. Proposition 12 allows the Civil Service Commission to make recommendations to the City Council on disposition of accumulated sick leave. These recommendations on Civil Service matters were presented to give the citizens an opportunity to voice their opinions on these proposed changes in the Charter. The Charter Commission felt that, overall, the adoption of these changes would make for more efficiency within our city employee force. Summary After seven months of work and after considering many other changes to the Charter, the Charter Commission has adopted the above twelve propositions to submit to the voters. On the name change issue, not all members of the Charter Commission were necessarily in favor of the name change or the suggested name but all felt that the citizens should be given the opportunity to vote on the matter. The other propositions are suggested changes which the Charter Commission collectively felt would give the citizens of our City a more efficient administration of local government. The seventeen citizens of the City who gave of their time as members of the Charter Commission have done their best. Respectfully submitted, 1986-87 CHARTER COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By IslJim Kenna Jim Kenna Chairman ATTEST: Is/George Tucker George Tucker Secretary I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I PROPOSITION NO. 1 Effective January 1, 1988 the official name of North Richland Hills, Texas shall be North Hills, Texas. Form on the Ballot: "Proposition No. 1 FOR CHANGING THE NAME OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TO NORTH HILLS. AGAINST CHANGING THE NAME OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TO NORTH HILLS. II I, Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I PROPOSITION NO. 2 Sections 1 through 31, inclusive, of Article XII of the Charter dealing with Finance are repealed and the following sections of Article XII are adopted: SECTION 1. The City's financial expenditures shall be governed by an annual budget. The bUdget shall embrace the fiscal year of the City as opposed to the calendar year. SECTION 2. The City Manager shall prepare and submit to the City Council a proposed budget at least 45 days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. The City Council shall hold a public hearing on the budget and shall give at least ten days notice of said public hearing in the official newspaper of the City. SECTION 3. At the public hearing or at any regular or special called Council meeting, the City Council shall make such changes in the proposed budget as it deems advisable and shall adopt a budget prior to the first day of the fiscal year. If the City Council fails to adopt a budget in final form before such date, the budget proposed by the City Manager shall be deemed to have been adopted. SECTION 4. Once the budget is adopted the City Manager shall authorize no expenditure over the total funds for expenditure in the overall budget unless the budget is amended by the same public notice procedure called for in adopting the budget. I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I SECTION 5. The budget shall be a public record and a copy shall remain on file in the office of the City Secretary for public inspection. SECTION 6. The Council shall cause an independent audit to be made of the books of account, records and transactions of all the administrative departments of the City at least once yearly. Such audits, during such fiscal year, shall be made by one or more certified public accountants who for three years next preceding have held a certificate issued by the State Board of Accountancy of the State of Texas, or by a state maintaining an equal standard of professional requirements, which entitled the holder of such certificate to a Texas certificate. The auditor or auditors to make the said audit shall be selected by the Council, and shall be responsible to the Council. The duties of the auditor or auditors so appointed shall include the certification of all statements. The report of such auditor or auditors for the fiscal year shall be printed and copy thereof shall be furnished to each member of the Council, the City Manager, and to each citizen who may apply therefor. The original report of the said auditor or auditors shall be kept among the permanent records of the City. Form on the Ballot: "Proposition No. 2 FOR REQUIRING FINANCIAL EXPENDITURES TO BE GOVERNED BY AN ANNUAL BUDGET BASED UPON THE FISCAL YEAR, REQUIRING SUBMISSION AND PUBLIC NOTICE OF BUDGET HEARINGS, REQUIRING PUBLIC NOTICE TO AMEND THE BUDGET, MAKING THE BUDGET A PUBLIC RECORD AND REQUIRING AN ANNUAL INDEPENDENT AUDIT. AGAINST REQUIRING FINANCIAL EXPENDITURES TO BE GOVERNED BY AN ANNUAL BUDGET BASED UPON THE FISCAL YEAR, REQUIRING SUBMISSION AND PUBLIC NOTICE OF BUDGET HEARINGS, REQUIRING PUBLIC NOTICE TO AMEND THE BUDGET, MAKING 'THE BUDGET A PUBLIC RECORD AND REQUIRING AN ANNUAL INDEPENDENT AUDIT. II I, Ie I I I I 1 I 1 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I PROPOSITION NO. 3 Sections 2 through 11, inclusive of Article XIII, dealing with taxation, are repealed and the following sections of Article XIII are adopted: SECTION 2. The City Council shall have full power to provide for the prompt collection of taxes imposed and the procedures, time limits, interest, penalties and methods of levying, imposing, assessing and collection of taxes shall be those prescribed by State law. The Council shall impose such ad valorem taxes as are necessary to support the budget. SECTION 3. There shall be exempt from taxation all property exempted by the State Constitution, State Statutes and the ordinances of the City, as they are now or as they may be amended. SECTION 4. All rights, privileges and franchises heretofore or hereafter granted to and held by any person, firm or corporation, in the streets, alleys, highways, or public grounds or places in said City, shall be subject to taxation by said City separately from and in addition to the other assets of such person, firm or corporation, and the governing body of the City may require the rendition and assessment thereof accordingly. Form on the Ballot: "Proposition No. 3 FOR PROVIDING FOR TAXES TO BE ASSESSED AND COLLECTED PURSUANT TO STATE LAW, PROVIDING FOR EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM TAXATION AND TO ALLOW THE PROPERTY OF FRANCHISE HOLDERS TO 8E TAXED. AGAINST PROVIDING FOR TAXES TO BE ASSESSED AND COLLECTED PURSUANT TO STATE LAW, PROVIDING FOR EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM TAXATION AND TO ALLOW THE PROPERTY OF FRANCHISE HOLDERS TO BE TAXED. II I, Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I PROPOSITION NO. 4 Section 4 of Article IX of the Charter is repealed and the following Section 4 is adopted: SECTION 4. All purchases over $5,000.00 shall be made only after competitive bidding. Advertisement for bids shall be published in the official newspaper at least ten days before opening of bids. The bids will be sealed and opened in public as directed by the City Council. The City Council shall select the bid most advantageous to the City. The City Council shall have the right to reject all bids. The $5,000.00 limit presently conforms to State law and the figure shall change as the State Statute is amended in the future. This competitive bidding requirement may be waived only upon a finding by the City Council that an ~mergency exists or in the event of public calamity where it is necessary to act at once to protect the citizens or property of the City. Form on the Ballot: IIProposition No. 4 FOR REQUIRING COMPETITIVE BIDDING FOR CITY PURCHASES OVER $5,000.00. AGAINST REQUIRING COMPETITIVE BIDDING FOR CITY PURCHASES OVER $5,000.00.11 I, Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I I- I PROPOSITION NO. 5 Section A of Article XIV shall hereafter read as follows: IIA. PLANNING Section 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission There shall be established a Planning and Zoning Commission which shall consist of seven (7) citizens of the City of North Richland Hills who own real property within the said City. The members of said Commission shall be appointed by the City Council for a term of two (2) years. Three (3) members of the P1anning and Zoning Commission sha11 be so appointed each odd-numbered year and four (4) members shall be so appointed each even-numbered year. Vacancies and unexpired terms shall be fi11ed by the City Council for the remainder of that member1s term. The Commission shall elect a Chairman from among its membership. The Commission shall meet at least once monthly and may schedule additional regular meetings as are required by the level of agenda activity. A quorum for any meeting of the Commission shall be a majority of the members. Members of the Commission may be removed by the Mayor with the consent of the City Council after a public hearing and for cause set forth in writing. The Commission shall keep minutes of its proceedings which shall be of public record. The Commission shall serve without compensation. Section 2. Planning and Zoning Commission Powers and Duties. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall: (A) Recommend a City Master P1an for the physica1 deve10pment of the City; (B) Recommend to the City Counci1 the approval or disapprova1 of any proposed changes in the Zoning Ordinance text or map; and I ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I (C) Exercise control over all platting or subdividing of land within the corporate limits of the City and outside said corporate limits to the extent authorized by law. Make specific recommendations to the City Council whether a plat be approved or denied. The City Council shall make final approval or denial of all plats. The Commission shall be responsible to and act as an advisory body to the City Council and shall have and perform such additional duties as may be prescribed by the ordinances. Section 3. Master Plan The Master Plan for the physical development of the City of North Richland Hills shall contain the Commissions' recommendations for growth, development and beautification of the City. A copy of the Master Plan, or any part thereof, shall be forwarded to the City Council, which may adopt this plan in whole or in parts, and may adopt any amendments thereto after at least one public hearing on the proposed plan. The City Council shall act on such Plan, or part thereof, within sixty (60) days following its submission by the Commission. If such a Plan, or part thereof, shall be rejected by the City Council, the Commission may modify such Plan or part thereof, and again forward it to the City Council for consideration. All amendments to the Master Plan recommended by the Commission shall be submitted in the same manner as outlined above to the City Council for approval and all revisions affecting the Master Plan shall be accompanied by a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Section 4. Legal Effect of the Master Plan Upon the adoption of a Master Plan for the City of North Richland Hills by the City Council, that Plan shall become a general guideline for all decisions made by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council related to existing or proposed development of the City. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I On any case coming before the Planning and Zoning Commission the Commission shall make a recommendation to the City Council to approve or deny the proposal. If the recommendation of the Commission is to deny the proposal the reasons for that denial shall be communicated to the City Council. The City Council shall have the power to overrule such recommendation of denial, and upon such overruling, the City Council shall have the power to proceed. Any zoning action taken to revise the Zoning Map of the City of North Richland Hills which shall have had proper hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission and from which a recommendation is given by the Commission to the City Council, and after proper public hearing and consideration before the City Council, is approved by the City Council; such change in the Zoning Map shall also be deemed to have revised the Future Land Use Map as it appears in the Master Plan of the City of North Richland Hills.1I Form on the Ballot: IIProposition No. 5 FOR ESTABLISHING SEVEN (7) MEMBER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND ESTABLISHING THE CITY MASTER PLAN AS A GENERAL GUIDELINE FOR PLANNING AND ZONING DECISIONS. AGAINST ESTABLISHING SEVEN (7) MEMBER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND ESTABLISHING THE CITY MASTER PLAN AS A GENERAL GUIDELINE FOR PLANNING AND ZONING DECISIONS. II I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I PROPOSITION NO. 6 Subsection (1) of Section 7 of Article VI shall be amended to read as follows: (1) The Municipal Court shall be presided over by a Magistrate to be known as Municipal Judge who shall be a duly licensed attorney practicing law in Tarrant County, Texas. If the Municipal Judge is unable to act for any reason the Mayor may appoint a qualified person to act as substitute Municipal Judge. The City Council shall have the power to create a second Municipal Court to be known as Municipal Court Number 2. The Mayor of the City shall be empowered to administer oaths and issue warnings to persons in police custody if the Mayor is qualified pursuant to State Law by attendance and completion of the mandatory courses prescribed by the laws of the State of Texas. II Form on Ballot: nproposition No. 6 FOR AMENDMENT OF MUNICIPAL JUDGE'S QUALIFICATIONS AGAINST AMENDMENT OF MUNICIPAL JUDGE'S QUALIFICATIONS" I, Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I PROPOSITION NO. 7 Section 5 of Article XVII of the Charter is amended to read as follows: liThe Civil Service Commission shall recommend policies, procedures, rules and regulations to the City Council for approval. The Commission shall operate always within the bounds of the City Charter, the Constitution and the laws of the State of Texas and the Federal Constitution. II Form on the Ballot: "Proposition No.7 FOR MAKING THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION A RECOMMENDING BODY ON POLICIES, PROCEDURES, RULES AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO COVERED PERSONNEL. AGAINST MAKING THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION A RECOMMENDING BODY ON POLICIES, PROCEDURES, RULES AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO COVERED PERSONNEL. II I, Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I I- I PROPOSITION NO. 8 Section 8 of Article XVII is repealed and the subject matter shall be governed by Section 2 of Article XVII. Form on the Ballot: "Proposition No.8 FOR REPEAL OF SECTION 8 OF ARTICLE XVII OF THE CHARTER. AGAINST REPEAL OF SECTION 8 OF ARTICLE XVII OF THE CHARTER." I, Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I II I I I Ie I PROPOSITION NO. 9 Section 12 of Article XVII of the Charter shall read as follows: A person who has received appointment to any department hereunder shall serve a probationary period of twelve (12) months. All positions in the City covered by this Article, except any supervisory personnel directly appointed by the City Manager or by the City Council, shall be classified by the Commission and the positions filled from the eligibility lists as provided herein. Form on the Ballot: "Proposition No. 9 FOR AMENDMENT OF SECTION 12, ARTICLE XVII OF THE CHARTER BY DESIGNATING THOSE APPOINTMENTS WHICH SHALL NOT BE ON THE CLASSIFIED LISTS. AGAINST AMENDMENT OF SECTION 12, ARTICLE XVII OF THE CHARTER BY DESIGNATING THOSE APPOINTMENTS WHICH SHALL NOT BE ON THE CLASSIFIED LISTS. II I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I PROPOSITION NO. 10 The first sentence of Subsection D of Section 14 of Article XVII of the Charter shall read as follows: IIAll applicants for a position shall be given an identical examination which may include three parts: a competitive written examination, an oral interview by an interview board, and/or an assessment center exercise, each of which may be the only method of testing or which may be used in any combination thereof. II Form on the Ballot: "Proposition No. 10 FOR ALLOWING A THREE PART TESTING PROCEDURE. AGAINST ALLOWING A THREE PART TESTING PROCEDURE." I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I I- I PROPOSITION NO. 11 The first paragraph of Section 22 of Article XVII of the Charter shall read as follows: "Employees while on duty with the City of North Richland Hills shall not be permitted to take active part in the political campaign of another for an elective position of the City of North Richland Hills. The term active means making political speeches, passing out cards, or other political literature, writing letters, actively and openly soliciting votes and making public derogatory remarks about candidates for such elective positions. Provided that the Commission or the City shall not further restrict the rights of the employees of the City to engage in political activities except as herein expressly provided. II Form on the Ballot: "Proposition No. 11 FOR PROHIBITING CITY POLITICAL ACTIVITY OF CITY EMPLOYEES WHILE ON DUTY FOR THE CITY. AGAINST PROHIBITING CITY POLITICAL. ACTIVITY OF CITY EMPLOYEES WHILE ON DUTY FOR THE CITY. II I, Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I {' I PROPOSITION NO. 12 The third paragraph of Section 25 of Article XVII shall read as follows: IISick leave with pay may be accumulated without limit and may be used while an employee is unable to work because of any bonafide illness. The section shall not prevent the Commission from recommending to the City Council any plan designed to benefit or compensate employees for any accumulatetJ sick leave. II Form on the Ballot: "Proposition No. 12 FOR ALLOWING THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND TO THE COUNCIL A PLAN DESIGNED TO BENEFIT OR COMPENSATE EMPLOYEES FOR ACCUMULATED SICK LEAVE. AGAINST ALLOWING THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND TO THE COUNCIL A PLAN DESIGNED TO BENEFIT OR COMPENSATE EMPLOYEES FOR ACCUMULATED SICK LEAVE. II I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Administration Resulution Supporting Texds Wdr uu Cr~illl~, Resolution No. 87-4 1/12/87 - Council Meeting Date: GN 87-7 Agenda Number: The Mayor's Criminal Justice Task Force is requesting that the cities throughout Texas pass resolutions supporting Texas War on Crime. The Task Force plans to present these resolutions to the Texas legislature during the Texans Anti-Crime Day in Austin. Recommendation: Approve/Disapprove Resolution No. 87-4. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~<..Ù/)fMV~# Department Head Signature ..Iþ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEtJr , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I fReøølutføn No. 87-4 <ttity of Nortl} 1Birl}lanà Bills WHEREAS, in spite of the dedication and best efforts of our law enforcement community, we find that the crime rate continues to rise and that our Texas businesses and law abiding citizens continue to needlessly suffer; WHEREAS, the problems caused by crime and criminal acts being visited upon our citizens is unacceptable and must be rectified; WHEREAS, the first function of government at all levels is to protect and safeguard the lives and property of its citizens; WHEREAS, the citizenry requires that governments at all levels take whatever action and appropriate whatever sums are necessary to properly fulfill said above referenced first function of government; WHEREAS, the law enforcement community and the law abiding citizens of Texas require that more attention be focused on crime solutions identified to address our crime problems, and actions implemented to solve said crime problems, and WHEREAS, cities throughout Texas are presently working in a cooperative endeavor to identify those solutions which may be implemented unilaterally by the cities and those which require state legislative action; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills do hereby resolve and recommend that each mayor, chief of police, commissioner's court, sheriff, district attorney and all other appropriate officials and concerned citizens continue the process above described and develop and support a strong well round~d anti-crime package to be presented to the 70th Session of the Texas legislature to convene in January, 1987; and I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I Resolution No. 87-4 Page 2 FURTHERMORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills find and determine that said anti-crime legislation is the singular most important issue affecting the lives, property, and safety of the citizens of Texas which will be dealt with in said legislative session. PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of January, 1987. Dan Echols, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex McEntire, Attorney \ I- .1" Ie I I I I I I I -- I 1 I I I I I Ie I a CITY OF DALLAS A. Starke Taylor Jr. Mayor November 24, 1986 Mayor Dan Echols City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Dear Mayor Echols: As you know, the Mayor's Criminal Justice Task Force has been working very hard over the past year to develop innovative approaches to fighting the increased crime rate in the City of Dallas, as well as the State of Texas. The support gained through our vigorous efforts has been outstanding. I am proud to be able to present the First Annual Report to you and ask for your help in a number of areas. ~ 1. Join Dallas and other cities throughout Texas by passing formal resolutions through your city councils. The list of those mayors and cities already endorsing our efforts and a copy of the resolution is in our first year's report. Texas Speaker of the House Gib Lewis has made our Texas War On Crime Legislative Package his top priorIty. We wIll be delivering all resolutions to Speaker Lewis personally. Please send your resolution to Sherry Smith, Project Director, as soon as possible. 2. Our Task Force plans to have a Texans Anti-Crime Day in Austin, while the Legislature is in session. This day will bring together mayors, police chiefs, sheriffs, and many others who support the Legislature taking strong actions toward criminal justice reforms. I invite you to join me in Austin when I present your resolution to Speaker Lewis and the Governor. If you are unable to join me, please let Sherry Smith know of the designated official from your city who plans to attend. You can reach her at 214/670-5394. OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY HALL DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 TELEPHONE 214/67D-4054 I~ I . e I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I - I I .., " . . 3. Drug and alcohol abuse is a serious problem which is directly related to crimes being committed. I have designated Sunday, February 15, 1987, as Texans United Day. It is my hope that every church and Sunday School class will participate by informing their church members of the positive alternatives to alcohol and drug abuse. We hope that churches will also talk about those organizations in the community that work to address this important issue. Please jOin me by working with your community in this effort. Our office will help you to coordinate activities on that Sunday. There is much work to be done. It is time for us to make the commitment and solve the crime problem facing each of us. Tògether we can make a difference. With your help, every community in Texas will become a safer place to live. Thank you once again for all your support. Sincerely, /' ~;] /. . 4J-, \': £A. C/'ð Jèf. A. Starke Taylor, Jr. Mayor City of Dallas OFFICE OF THE MAYOA erTY HALL DALLAS. TEXAS 75201 TELEPHONE 214/67o-4Q541 'I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: Purchasing . Council Meeting Date: 1-12-87 ~ Bid award to Business Interiors for office furniture Subject: in the amount of $14,424. 92 Agenda Number: PU 87-1 I I I I I I On December 12, 1986 at 10:00 a.m., sealed bids were opened and are outlined below: Company Exceptions Amount Maddock Trinity Montgomery General Office Finger Contract Interior *Business Interiors o o o o o o o $16,153.05 16,115.14 15,338.80 15,302.16 15,068.60 15,291.40 14,424.92 The subject office furniture is earmarked for the new public works facility at 7200 Watauga Road. Recommendation: Approve bid award to Business Interiors for office furniture in the amount $ 14,424.92 Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating BUd~L /) ~ Oth e r flti::.t---;;r;f!) epartment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director ¡/t~ City Manager Paqe 1 of Ie ßtar of the Metroplex CITY OF NORr¿ RICHLAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 'I I INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM r VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: ~ I Business Interiors Request For: Furniture - Public Works 1401 Henderson St. Bid Opening Date: December 12t 1986 10:00 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 a.m. I Date: Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until December 12 1986 10:00 a.m. City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Bo~ 18609 I North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: Citv ,.,~ Phone: ?Rl -nnb 1 t-" V - ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL I A Task desks .. Hon 60271. light oak 2 each 148.78 297. 56 B Storage module, cat.#193l, Conf. A Hon 2 each 88.60 177.20 C Printer stand~ cat. # 6054l~ light oak Hon 2 each 130.77 261.54 I D Wire rack, cat.#609345 , Hon 2 each 19.42 38.84 E Hangrail svstem.Cat.#2717!Hon 2 each 56.86 113.72 F Chairs, Cat.#Z37,F28 Hon 2 each 167.26 334.52 I G 6'Desk , Cat.#1067l Walnut Hon 2 each 236.43 472.86 H Credenza,Cat.#1064l Walnut Hon 2 each 205.63 411.26 I 6' Desk,Cat.#15291tWa1nut Hon 1 each 381.73 381.73 I . Credenza Cat.#15232,Wa1nut Hon 1 each 305.13 305.13 5' Metal Desks,Cat.#33055,Light oak,Hon 12 each 208.00 2,496.00 L Lateria1 Fi1es.2 drawer Cat.#10562 Med.Oak 5 each 181.94 909.70 It M File rack (for 1aterial files) Cat.#51-1590 10 each 4.27 42. 70 N 5' Table w/drawer .Cat.#87l0 Walnut 2 each 185.73 371.46 0 Overhead storage, Cat.#15234,Walnut 1 each 293.76 293.76 I p Task Lighting Cat.#EL30,Hon EL31 1 each 52.02 52.02 Q Table,Cat.#15273 Walnut Hon 1 each 199.00 199.00 R Bookcase. Cat.HlS83 Walnut Hon 2 each 203.73 407.46 I ~ Arm rn~;r -Mpn ()::¡k ~::¡rlO' #7?0 F::¡hr;(' .132 Ron 4 each 79.60 318.40 '1' LeQ Table - Med. Oak i21x2l)Catlg.#728 Hon 1 each 56.86 56.86 U Ash Trav - Bronze Cat.# JAM 442 1 each 49.83 49.83 I V Secretarial Desk, Cat. # 1058lR Med. Oak 2 each 165.36 330.72 W Secretarial Desk,Cat.# 10502L Med. Oak 10582L 1 each 165.36 165.36 X Return, Cat. # 10502L Med Oak (left) 1 each 113.24 113.24 II Y Return, Cat. # 1050lR Med. Oak (right) 2 each 113.24 226.48 I Z Secretarial Chairs, Cat.# 849 Med. Oak~ 3 each 119.39 358.17 Fabric J-32 .. TOTAL PRICE MUST INCLUDE DELIVERY AND SETUP SUB-TOTAL 9-:187. 52 Il ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 14,424.92 ~ 1 TERMS Net % 30 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 65 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- - Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- 1_, or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its best interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. IN SUBMITTING THI:S BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY: Business Interiors BY: Etta Miller PHONE NUMBER: 817-335-5426 SIGNATURE: t:~;) ~} DATE: 12/11/86 THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER I 'I Ie Star of the Metroplex CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS II INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM Ir VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: , II Business Interiors Request For: Furniture - Public Works 1401 Henderson St. Bid Opening Date: December 12, 1986 10:00 a.m. Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Date: II Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until December 12, 1986 10:00 a.m. City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 IIITEM North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: Citv Secretary Phone: 281-0041 DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL II A Secret-arial Chair wi th arms 9 Cat. II 847 Med.Oak Fabric J-32 Hon 1 each 169.14 169.14 B Executive Chair, Cat. II GD26,Walnut, Fabric V36 2 each 171. 04 . 342.08 II C Executive Chair,Cat.#GA18,Walnut,Fabric J98 Hon 1 each 221.26 221.26 D Executive Chairs,Cat.IIW22,Fabric J32 Hon 10 each 91.92 919.20 E Chairs,Cat.IIW42,Fabric N20 Hon 4 each 52.12 208.48 II _F Side chairs,Cat.#376,Wa1nut Fabric V36Hon 6 each 109.92 659.52 G Side chairs,Cat.1I6458 ,Wa1nut,Fabric J98 Ron 4 each 93.33 373.32 H Side chairs,Cat.IIW42,Fabric N24 Hon 4 each 52.12 208.48 Lateria1 Files,Cat.#10662,Walnut,Hon 4 each 199.94 799.76 File racks,Cat.1I5l-l590 Hon 8 each 4.27 34.16 K File Cabinets,Cat.#2l2C,light brown,Hon 12 each 108.50 1,302.00 .- II III II ; II - II II TOTAT PRICE MUST INCLUDE DELIVERY AND SETUP II SUB-TOTAL 5,237.40 ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 14,424.92 ~ - TERMS Net % 30 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH &ICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 6S DAYS FROM ~ECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North RichJand Hills Purchas- aPept. reserves the right to reje~t a.ny or a~J bids. waive formali- t- or to award purchases on an Individual Item baSIs when In its st interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- D FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. IN SUBMITTING THI:S BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BINDING CONTRAC.T. . COMPANY: BUSlneSS InterlorS BY: Etta Miller PHONE NUMBER: 817 335- 5426 SIGNATURE: h ~ YVLUßA-.OATE: 12/1l/86 THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER I 'I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by * (a) Business Interiors complies with all the specifications as outlined in the city of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors * (b) No exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. Company Name Business Interiors By Etta Miller Title Sales Representative Date December 11, 1986 THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION Vendor Note: * (a) Type or write in Company Name * (b) Type or wri te in Number of Exceptions, if none, so state "NO" 'I~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I GENERAL CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAt'¡ING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his- bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditio~s not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. . .; Ih 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) 'ihere the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. 'I. Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF -BIDDERS Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent~ in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6 · AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7 . ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Manager. Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS ..: .. ;. ~. Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however~ may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) 'I~ Ie I I (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. I I I I I -- I I .~ " ,;. .. I I I I I f I 'I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I GENERAL CONDITIONS Miscellaneous Purchase 1. Delivery shall be to the location identified on the purchase order within the City of North Richland Hills. 2. The contract will be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications at the price bid. 3. In the event of partial shipments or multiple deliveries, the quantities shown on the bid are estimated quantities only. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to purchase more than or less than the quantities shown. In any event, the unit bid prices shall govern. . ---""""'\ 4. The contract will be awarded at the prices bid, for a period of approximately one year. 5. Bidder warrants that all deliveries made under the contract will be of the type and quality specified; and the City of North Richland Hills Purchasing Agent may "reject and/or refuse any delivery which falls below the quality specified in the specifications. The City of North Richland Hills shall not be held to have accepted any delivery until after an inspection of same has been made and an opportunity to exercise its right of rejection has been afforded. 6. All manufacturer's warranties shall inure to the benefit of the City of North Richland Hills, and replacement of defective materials shall be made promptly upon request. 7. Failure by the contractor to make reasonable delivery as and when requested shall entitle the Purchasing Agent to acquire quantities from alternate sources wherever available, with the right to seek reimbursement from the contractor for amounts, if any, paid by the City of North Richland Hills over and above the bid price. 8. All materials delivered shall be free of any and all liens and shall upon acceptance thereof become the property of the City of North Richland Hills, free and clear of any materialman's, supplier's, or other type liens. 9. Regardless of the award of a contract hereunder, the City of North Richland Hills retains the right to purchase the same or similar materials or items from other sources should it be determined that doing so would be in the City of North Richland Hills best interest, based on cost and quality considerations; however, in such event, the contractor will be given the first option of meeting or rejecting the proposed alternate source's lower price or higher quality. 10. Acceptance by the City of North Richland Hills of any delivery shall not relieve the contractor of any guarantee or warranty, express or implied, nor shall it be considered an acceptance of material not in accordance with the specifications thereby waiving the City of North Richland Hills right to request replacement of defective material. 11. Variations from specifications may be acceptable provided such variation, in each instance, is noted and explained on a separate document. 'I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I f I / ) City of J(õrth Richl'nd Hills, Texas ~ ~ ,~:,."...~ d,.....:t""·... '. ,'q; '" 8 f"86 ~ t: L t,:.1V t. tJ r'ï ¡j ~ <... ¡~ November 24, 1986 PURL: 0110-86 TO: All furniture vendor's bidding office furniture for public works building FROM: John Whitney, Director Support Services REF: Invitation to bid, (closing date December 12, 1986) Please delete paragraph number four (4) under general conditions" Miscellaneous Purchase fl. The deleted paragraph reads; " The contract will be awarded at the prices bid» for a period of approximately one year." If you should þave any questions regarding this correction please contact me at 817-281-0047 or metro 498-5642. c~ Y~J tJ£=tJ J n H. Whitney . irector Support Services JHW;cr (817) 281·0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 76118 .. I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I City of J{órth Richland Hills~ Texas ~~ ¡)J _ ! ~,., --- ',: J f .. .I ,., '. ,...-..-~ ~." r'-- ~"': ~ . .. " ..-: .......... . '. ,J ".-1 ,;....;: December 4t 1986 PURM: 0077-86 TO: All Furniture Bidders FROM: John H. WhitneYt Director of Support Services SUBJECT: Invitation to Bid (Closing date December 12, 1986) Item "w" on the quotation form should read "Secretarial Desk, Cat. #10582L Med. Oak. We preceded this memo with a phone call to all vendors receiving on invitation to bid and explained the correction: SinCerelYi~ Jo n H. Whitney \ rector of Support Services JHW;drr (817) 281-004117301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76180 I I I ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Purchasing Council Meeting Date: 1-12-87 Bid award to Beall Contractors Supply for (1) one Subject: 35 H.P. Concrete/Asphalt Saw in the amount of $5,825.00 Agenda Number: PU86-2 On December 29, 1986 at 10:00 a.m. , sealed bids were opened in public with one vendor in attendance. Below is a summary of the bids: VENDOR EXCEPTIONS BID AMOUNT I.I.I. Services 0 $ 9,007.00 ~ Allied 0 $ 6,375.00 Superior 0 $ 6,362.88 Moody Day 0 $ 5,990.00 Fischer Equipment 0 $ 5,934.60 ~ Beall Equipment 0 $ 5,825.00 Recommendation: Approve the purchase of (1) concrete/asphalt saw from Beall Equipment in the amount of $ 5,825.00 ~ ~ I I , Source of Funds: ~ Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget --L I" Other ~ W - I Department Head Sign I Finance Review Acct. Number 01-60-04-6400 Sufficient Funds Available ure . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I t/~ Ie ßtar of the Metroplex CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM ~ "' VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: It Request For: Concrete / Asphalt Saw Beall Constractors Supply 2725 Premier Bid Opening Date: 10:00 a.m. December 29, 1986 Fort Worth, Texas 76111 Date: II Requisition No. I Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. December 29, 1986 t City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 II North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: Jeanette Rewis Phone: 281-0041 IrlTEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL .. II . II EDC 0 r p 0 / A~nhalt: Saw £ g 24-35..Lj 7 15 R :15-. (X) 5~:25 .00 ~ , " II Per attached Specifications (E QUA L) v --.- . .. It - II ; .. - I ~- II II II SUB-TOTAL l.¿ ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID ." ~ 5?~5 .OO~ - Ne, 60 ÞAÿ S J"ERMS % DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH ICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 1- 2.0 DAYS FROM ECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- t ' or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its st interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- D FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS. ~'e~r;1Jb ð '" ~ i-<.:>t K IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY: 'Be~ II Go,vreACl'Oe SuPPLY BY: 13 ( ,\ Ake e PHONE NUMBER: ~ 17 - 831-3 t 8l SIGNATURE:~ ~~ DATE: 12 -zl1-<!fo I THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER c ~ I ..,. // / I' .' I I· I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I ENGINE * Model C355 wisconsin. air cooled» 4 cycle * 35 H.P. @ 2400 RPM.or equal. ELECTRICAL: * Electric starter. alternator. battery and ammeter. * 12 volt electrical system. FUEL TANK: * 5 gallon. /" ~./þ BLADE: * Unit must have blade dual guards to accommoåate up to 24 inch blade. * Cutting depth indicator. * Lîfting frame * Electro hyd~aulic blade depth control. Miscellaneous:. * * * * Dual water system Hydrostatic forward and reverse drive Cutting line pointers Se1.f propelled. (EQUAL), . .- ~B ;. , ZLl-35-4 (E DCa ") 1817' 281·0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 -. I·" · I' _ I I I I I I I Ie I I I II I I I I_ I The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by (a) 't3@AI\ C.OtJT€AcTOe ~~( complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) ~O (!'fuAl2 exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of ;. any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. W-~O.~ Signed ~~ 11\eytl Title L;) - }'ò- 8~ Date ~E'A II CO~Jì(2~Q.TO(<" S:UrpLy Company Name THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION Vendor Note: (a). Vendor: Company Name (b). Number of Exceptions, If None Write "~O" I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I GENERAL CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIR~ŒNTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS ' After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the· City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I I_ I 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF -BIDDERS Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) (b) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. (c) (d) (e) (f) _/ 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of êontract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Mañager. . Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) I Ie I (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I Ie I. I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I GENERAL CONDITIONS EQUIPMENT BIDS 1. Equipment other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series identifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern; in general, the size and type of equipment desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications must be noted and explained on a separate document. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. 3 The unit shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the unit made ready for operation. 4. Bidder must fill in all information asked for in the blanks provided under each item. Failure to completely describe the equipment may result in rejection of the bid. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. 5. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the .equipment he proposes to furnish. 6. Manufacturer's standard warranty for parts and labor must be included in this bid. 7. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. ~ I I Finance . Department: 411bubject: Proposed change order for Police Department addition. ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date: 1-12-87 Agenda Number: PU 87-3 On October 13, 1986, City Council approved the bid for the police building expansion project. The low bidder for that proposal was Calvin Baker and T. W. Gilmore joint venture in the amount of $1,208,000. In an effort to be conservative, several major items were deleted as a cost savings in case the bid came in at a greater amount than was anticipated. A brief tabulation of the original budget estimates and the contract that was awarded is listed as follows: Original Budget Approved Contract Construction ( Including $60,000. contingency budget) $ Architects / Engineering Future possible change orders $ 1,600,000. 300,000. -0- 1,900,000. $ $ 1,208,000. 300,000. 392,000. 1,900,000. The major item deleted from the original plan was for reconstructing the entire parking area around City Hall with concrete. We advised City Council at the October 13, 1986 meeting that an itemized li~t was being prepared which is as follows: Proposed Change Order Items 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Asphalt removal and concrete paving $ New brick enclosure Flooring Vinyl wall covering Carpeting Cabinets and storage Lockers and installation Painting and fascia to match existing fascia Sign installation Reinforced steel in concrete slab Changing detention equipment (jail cells) subcontractor to Southern Steel for improved security. 103,404. 5,381. 20,676. 19,597. 1,630. 29,435. 10,126. 5,981. 6,150. 538. 10,800. 213,718. Funding Source $ Sufficient funds are available as described in the contract column above. -/ t Finance Director Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number See Above Bonds (GO/Rev.) --1L SU~ficie nds Available Operating Budget -----rY7 e Other ~ ati!:/; / / (~ "- .... epartment Head Signatur f: ~it;~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Funding Source Continued The proposed revised contract and budget are described as follows: Approved Contract Budget Proposed Contract Budget Construction Architects / Engineering Future Possible Change Orders Total Proposed Funding $ 1,208,000. 300,000. 392,000. 1,900,000. $ 1,421,718. * 300,000. 178,282. ** 1,900,000. $ $ * Includes these proposed change orders. ** Including remodelling of old Police Building for administrative offices. Recommendation: Approved the change order as itemized above to Calvin Baker / T.W. Gilmore for items (1) through (11) and amend the budgets as indicated above. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 'I' Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I I_ I T.W. GILMORE GENERAL CONTRACTOR P.o. Box 258 Smithfield, Texas 76180 817-281-2295 =~To".¡em~er 25, 108.~ Mr. Gene .::'r i t tz ...-\.lbert s. :~omatsu .S: Associates P.O. B O;{ 2 07 9 :?o!."t :'iorth, Texas 76113 Re: Police Station 2\ddition ~ Alteration :-rn.:-î, Texas Dear ~lr. Frittz: The following breaJ<do\Yn is for !:'emoving all existing asphalt paving. Existing curbs and gutters to remain. Install new concrete paving as per 1/SDC-1. aernove existing concrete approaches. Install new concrete approaches with 10' radii as per 1/SDC-4. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 1. 2. 3. Remove existing asphalt --------______ parking lot striping -------__________ Reinforcing Steel ----------_______ Cushion sand -------__________ Expans ion -Joint. mater ial -------_____,_ Concrete material -----____________ Labor on concrete work -----_-______.__ Curring & mise. tools -------________-. Caulking -________________ Concrete test ----_____________ Compaction Test -------__________ Patch asphalt at street ------________ $ 9,100.00 424.00 6,357.00 2,880.00 2,370.00 29,0:30.00 23,896.00 1,.500.00 12 ,/~·.30. 00 640.00 500.00 750.00 89,917.0·J 13,487.00 $l03,40¿1.00 4. :J. ~ ~ þ . 15~~ o·.¡erhead (~ pro=it - 'rO'rA~ If this cl-lange is approved, an extention of time in the amount of 21 days will be required. Yours truly, T. ~'.¡. GIU,,10RE CONSTRUCTIO~1 ,,~ R~C~T-;TDD \ ß ' .tj 1 ~.¡ ~ . (}; -- ~ .J....,/ . \. Tom ~'l. Gilmore T¡-]G~{.dc . _~ :~ : ~ 0 2 1 9 8 6 I I t A' ...,,.Y\ oJ" ; ~ ;,., qAT~U 0 ^ (1!'. n f" t i l.JLh ~ v. l\U'j~ w \J i\~")u". r ---.l 'I ' Ie I I 1 I I 1 I -- I I I I I I· I Ie I T.W. GILMORE GENERAL CONTRACTOR P.o. Box 258 Smithfield, Texas 76180 817-281-2295 I . ------...............___. i I J - ~¡ VEl) , )I"~ ,~ . v, [) 1" f.R.I! -' Ii! "".' ., . 1U.i.J. .. ¡"., ~ :., ,.~. /~-lt & j~~~; .... ~".....~......"''t~ ~ November 26, 1986 Mr. Gene Frittz Albert S. Komatsu & Associates 1300 S. University Drive Suite 200 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 RE: POLICE STATION ADDITION & ALTERATIONS North Richland Hills, Texas Dear r-1r. Frittz: The following breakdown is for installing new brick enclosure on the west side of new addition, as per 1/SDC-4 and 2/SDC-4. Concrete Material.............$ 120.00 Reinforcing Steel............. 24.00 Concrete Labor................ 598.00 Masonry....................... 3,970.00 Water Repellent............... 180.00 $4,892.00 Overhead & Profit............. 489.00 TOTAL $5,381.00 If this change is approve, an extension of time, in the amount of five days will be required. TG:kc "I ' Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I 'e I I T.W. GILMORE GENERAL CONTRACTOR P.o. Box 258 Smithfield, Texas 76180 817-281-2295 November 26, 1986 1·1r. Gene Fri ttz Albert S. Komatsu & Associates P. O. Box 2079 Fort ~'lorth, Texas 76113 Re: Police Station Addition & Alterations tJPJ:-I, Texas Dear ¡·l¡-. Frittz: The fOllowing breakdo~m is for change listed in change proposal ~Þ1. ~rovide resinous flooring in rooms: 161, 163, 171, 194, 193, 196, 197, 198, 199, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 218, 225, 227, 229, 231, 232, and 233. As per sheet SDA-9.1 and specification Section 09705 - Resinous flooring. V.C.T. credit, deduct ----____________ Floor hardener credit, deduct -________ Resinolls flooring, add -----P.._________ lo;~ over11ead & profit ---___ Total If resinous cove base is added. Rubber base, credit ------__________ Resinous flooring, add -----____-____ loc;~ overhead & profit ----- Total $ 744·.90 500.00 16,725.00 15,·480.10 1 ,54· 7 . 90 $17,028.00 $ 133.25 3,450.00 3,316.75 331.25 $ 3,648.00 For this work an additional 14 days will be required and added to the contract time. Yours truly, T. ~·v. G./~. ~. O~1STRUCTIOIJ #~~¿rJ2 om ~i. Gl.lmo....e T~1G/!<dc I' Ie I I I I I I I . I I 'I I I I I Ie I T.W. GILMORE GENERAL CONTRACTOR P.o. Box 258 Smithfield, Texas 76180 817-281-2295 ~lovember 26, 1986 Albert S. Komatsu & Associates P. O. Box 2079 Fort Worth, Te~~as 76113 l~e: Police Station ..:;'ddit:ions ,. Alter2J.tions NP~-I, Texas Gentleraen: The fol1m'lÌng breakdm·m is for change listed in Change Proposal ~~l. Omit paint and install vinyl ""'Ta11 covering in the fol1o\'lÌng rooras: 105,106,108,109,110,111,119,121,122,123,124,134,137,139,141, 142, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 164, 165, 166, 169, 171, 176, 177, 179, 181, 182 and 183. As per sheet SDA-l.l for new room finish schedule and color schedule. Delete detail 7/A-5.2. Omit paint ~ add vinyl wall covering la;"; overhea<..1 & profit -----___________ To1:al $17,815.00 1,782.00 $19,597.00 If this change is approved an extension of time in the amount of 10 days will be required. Yours truly, T. ~·l. GIU~CŒ¡ST:lUCTION ,4i?~;~~ // Torn~&l. G i Imor e T;'1G/]cdc 'I ' Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I T.W. GILMORE GENERAL CONTRACTOR P.o. Box 258 Smithfield, Texas 76180 817-281-2295 November 26, 1986 Mr. Gene Frittz Albert S. Komatsu & Associates 1300 S. University Drive Suite 200 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 RE: POLICE STATION ADDITION & ALTERATIONS North Richland Hills, Texas Dear Mr. Frittz: The following breakdown is for omitting VCT in rooms 149 and 176. Provided and install carpet C-1 as per sheet 16/SDA-6-1, revised room finish and color schedule. Credit for VCT ........$561.60 Carpet, add..........$2,043.68 $1,482.08 147.92 10% Overhead & Profit TOTAL . . . . . . $1,630.00 Yours truly, /!Ø~~~ / t: w. Gilmore TG:kc 'I · Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I T.W. GILMORE GENERAL CONTRACTOR P.o. Box 258 Smithfield, Texas 76180 817-281-2295 November 26, 1986 Mr_ Gene Frittz Albert S. Komatsu & Associates 1300 S. University Drive Suite 200 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 RE: POLICE STATION ADDITION & ALTERATIONS North Richland Hills, Texas Dear Mr. Frittz: The following breakdown is for providing additional cabinets and storage shelves, as shown on sheet SDA-6-4, in the following rooms: 106, 107, 113, 115, 131, 135, 137, 149, 164, 165, 166, 168, and 189. Millwork............$19,390.00 Painting............ 4,110.00 I t 11 t 3 260 00 Corrected error ns a a ion........ , . $26,750.00 26,760.00 10% Overhead & Profit.............. 2,675.00 TOTAL $29,425.00 29,435.00 If this change is approved, an extension of time, in the amount of 10 days will be required. Yours truly, ~~'~ TG:kc 'I . Ie I I I I I 1 I . I I I I I I I {' I T.W. GILMORE GENERAL CONTRACTOR P.o. Box 258 Smithfield, Texas 76180 817-281-2295 November 26, 1986 !1r. Gene Fri ttz Albert S. Komatsu & Associates P. O. Box 2079 Fort Worth, Texas 76113 Re: Police Station Addition & Alterations NRH, Texas Dear Mr. Frittz: The follo....ling breakdo'llm is for furnishing and installing 92 each l2"x18"x72" metal lockers, (full size), with metal base, as per l6/SDA-5,4 locker layout plan. Lockers ---------------------- $7,345.00 Installation ----------------- 1,860.00 9,203.00 1œ~ overhead & profit -------- 921.00 Total $10,126.00 If thi5 change is approved, an extension of time in the amount of five days will be required. Yours truly, 4%~::ê ~m "/1.' Gilmore T";'lG/kdc 'I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I .- I I T.W. GILMORE GENERAL CONTRACTOR P.o. Box 258 Smithfield, Texas 76180 817-281-2295 November 26, 1986 ~1r. Gene Fri ttz Albert S. Komatsu & Associates P. O. Box 2079 Fort ·~·lorth,· Texas 76113 Re: Police Station Addition & Alterations ~IRII, Texas Dear 1·1r. Frittz: The following breaJ~down is for ¡>ainting fascia on the existing Municipal Building to match fascia on the New Addition. painting --------_ lO?~ overhead & profit ---------- Total $5,437.00 544.00 $5,981.00 Yours trul'.l, ~~/-::~ / srom ~l. Gil¿nore T~"G/,J(dc 'I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I" I T.W. GILMORE GENERAL CONTRACTOR P.o. Box 258 Smithfield, Texas 76180 817-281-2295 November 26, 1986 t-1r. Gene Frittz .\lbert s. ~omatsu & Associates P. O. Box 2079 Fort Worth,· Texas 76113 Re: Police Station Addition ~ Alterations NRH, Texas Dear !1r. Fri ttz: The follo\ving breakdown is for increasing the signage allowance to $10,000.00. Allowance Increase ---______ Labor to i~stall signs -____ $5,000.00 1,000.00 6,000.00 15% overhead & profit on labor ---------_____________._ Total 150.00 $5,150.00 fours truly, T. 1"1. GILMORE. CONSTRUCTIOt~ aæßÄ~~ /~~~v. ~ilmore TIvG/1~dc "I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I T.W. GILMORE GENERAL CONTRACTOR P.o. Box 258 Smithfield, Texas 76180 817-281-2295 November 26, 1986 !1r-. Gene ?rittz Albert S. Komatsu & Associates :? o. 9 o::-~ 2 07 9 Fort i1orth, Texas 76113 Re: Police Station Additions & Alterations NR:-I, Texas Dear Mr. Frittz: The following breakdm~ is for additional reinforcing steel in concrete slab as per sheets SDS-l and SDS-l.l. Reinforcing Steel -----_____ Installation Labor -------___ lœ:~ overhead ,~ profit -____.__ Total -lours trul~·, ~;;u~ -;?d :'7. Gilmore T~-¡G/'hdc $326.00 163.0q 489.00 49.00 $538.00 'I · Ie I· I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I T.W. GILMORE GENERAL CONTRACTOR P.o. Box 258 Smithfield, Texas 76180 817-281-2295 ~1ovember 26, 1986 !:lr. Gene Frittz Albert S. Komatsu ~ Associates ~e: Police Station Additions & Alterations NR:i, Texas Dear ~·1r. Fr i ttz: The cost for changing the Detention Equipment Subcontractor to Southern Steel is $10,800.00 Please advise as soon as possible if this Change is approved. :!ou::-s truly, ¿;;ft;:~N Tom ::1. Gilmore TI'lG/!~dc . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance 1/12/87 .. - Council Meeting Date: Parking Lot Paving, Park Maintenance Facility on Watauga Road Agenda Number: PU 87-4 Estimates were solicited from contractors presently doing work for the City on other Capital Improvement Projects for the purpose of obtaining a change order to an existing project to provide for paving the Parks Maintenance facility's parking lot located on Watauga Road. Three estimates were received and are summarized as follows: BIDDER AMOUNT APAC-Texas, Inc. (Chapman) $12,500.00 $10,344.40 SRO Asphalt, Inc. (Lynn Terrace) Lowell ·B. Allison Contractor $ 9,882.00 (Miscellaneous Water & Sewer Improvements) Funding Source Funds were appropriated in the 1986-87 operating budget for this purpose. Recommendation It is recommended that Lowell B. Allison's contract for Miscellaneous Water and Sewer Improvements be amended in the amount of $9,882 to allow for the paving of the park facility parking lot on Watauga Road. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other , Finance Director Department Head Signatu e CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I ~ II I o ~ F I <:':E 261-2991 SRO ASPHALT, INC. PLANT 429-2452 PAVING CONTRACTORS 1007 HARRISON ST. . P.O. BOX 847 . ARLINGTON, TEXAS I e -I December 31, 1986 I To: The City of B. Jt1c:h1aDd 811la 7301 B.B. ~ 820 IIorth Richland _118, '1'exu .76180 I A'l'TENTIOlt I Wloyd ICcCallua We propose to furnish all equipment, material, la'bar and supervision to complete the work as follows: I Location: Para ~ a.tcreat1oD ParJdnc; Lot Watauga M. H. Rich1anã BiU., Texu 1 , Type and description of work, quantities and prices: PAlUCING LOT PAVING, I 1. Unclassified Excava~on Approximately 234 CY . 3.75 Per CY ------------------------$ 877.50 2. 6" Li.. S~11izec! SubÇJrade Approximately 710 SY @ 2.53 Per BY ------------------------$ 1,796.30 ]. Hydrai:ed Lime (30 !be SY) Approximately 10.6 TONS Q 90.00 Per TOM -------------------$ 954.00 4. 4" Hot Mix Asphaltic Concret:e Approximately 710 SY @ 9.46 Per SY ------------------------$ 6,116.60 1 APPROXIMATE TOTAL $ 10,344.40 1 .ßrlr -#: )t. G F. :;> - 2 "'J. 7 y~ 1Y~ v..ð.--~_o.. -F~~' ~~..¡... ¿J / R~øI!)-'L. TI"'~~. I 1 Billings are based on: ~ Measured quantities of completed work. D Lump sum as authorized .plus additional work as authorized by you. Payment will be made: D Net on completion and receipt of invoice. D Net on completion and receipt of invoice for each item or phase of construction as shown above. ŒJ Net for monthly estimates of completed work until completion. at which time the balance becpmes due and payable on receipt of invoice. 1 Your acceptance of this proposal by signing and returning one copy to us within thirty (30) days of date shall constitute a binding agreement and contract, and you agree to pay SRO Asphalt, Inc., the prices and amounts above within the time specified above. The place of performance of this contract shall be Tarrant County, Texas. This contract is subject to approval by our Credit Department. ........... ...-.....-...................... ........ .... .. .. .. .... .. ........ ...... .. .. ...... ................... .... .. ........ .. .............. .. ...... .. .... ............. .... .......... ...................... S ~SPHALT' INC. .~-_.. B~....... 0'. - . ... ..m..... ·Tta·· ~ïiid.D -. -'" .... --"""m ........ .......... By... __ __........__. ...._. 0.. __ __ u..... 0... .........__...0. ......... __...__ .... ..__ ... ...... __... 1-- Date... __.. __. .... .__.. __.. u..u.. u..... ..__.... .u.......... U. u..... ...... __.. __u __. ',U'.. Bank Reference...... u__. __. __u. ..__u. ....u. .".".__. .0.. o. _. __. ._'U. _.. .._ ... ., SPECIAL PROVISIONS TO BE APART HEREOF: f I 1. Our company operates "OPEN SHOP". 2. Due to the energy shortage and resulting raw materials availability, it is possible that performance of this contract could be delayed or curtailed, therefore, we assume no liability for non-performance due to these reasons. I 3. This contract will become null and void if the above quoted items of construction are not ready to commence within sixty (60) calendar days from the date of acceptance of this contract unless furth- er agreed to by SRO Asphalt, Inc. I 4. The prices quoted hereon are to be deemed good on the date quoted. and any increases thereafter in the price of our principal raw materials shall cause an increase in the quoted price by the amount of our actual cost increase. I 5. City Inspection and/or Permit Fees if required will be charged at actual cost. 6. Bonds if required will be charged at the rate of 1 o~ of the total amount of work completed. I 7. Prices quoted hereon include cost for A.G.C. dues. 8. We guarantee materials and workmanship to conform to the specifications as stated hereon for a period of one (1) year from date of completion, but cannot guarantee paving design. I 9. Retainage is not to be held from this contract unless specifically agreed to elsewhere in this con- tract. SPECIAL PROVISIONS AS CHECKED TO BE A PART HEREOF: I '- 10. If rock is encountered in excavation, this rock to be removed on an Hourly Equipment Rental Basis. D If additional grading is required to bring subgrade to within plus or minus 0.10 foot of finished grade this work can be done by us on an hourly equipment rental basis provided owner has a repre- se~tative at the job site to approve and sign each days rental ticket. Adjusting manhole covers will be charged at $150.00 per V.F. ($150.00 minimum each). I o o o o Adjusting- cleanout and/or valve boxes will be charged at $125.00 per V.F. ($125.00 minimum. each). I Prices quoted above include cost for Laboratory Testing. I All materials and workmanship to conform with Texas Highway Department 1972 Standard Speci- fications for Road and Bridge Construction. o All materials and workmanship to conform with current City of Standard Street Paving Specifications. , Texas, I o Prior to placin~ surface course it may be necessary to clean and patch the Binder Course. There is no equitable way to estimate the cost for this cleaning and patching, but we can do this work at cost plus 15%. I o Hydrated Lime if required for subgrade stabilization will be charged at $ o Excavated material to be placed on adjacent lots. o Clearing to be done on an Hourly E'quipment Rental Basis. per ton. I -- I I,." II I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I .. £owell R. Allison Contrnctor, Inc. 3725 FLORY STREET FORT WORTII, TEXAS 76118 LOWELL B, ALLISON Phone 589-2221 Metro Mobile 732-9129 Dec. 30th 19~6 Proposal to: City of North Richland Hills City Hall/Libãary,Parking Lot Parking lot ~aving Lump Sum $9~82.00 // ~ III .I If / ! f\ /I~-·- / / Signed j~V'A 4.~ U _"y.fh Project coordinator/Sales PA/2~DePr: /:?U~,- OÞ/:/G #.4 7" 1'9J.1 6~/R' ~ '" ~l~/ ..of ¢ I? '* ¡.(,¿' e p- .Y...J ~ ~y '-' - ~ ./P1/.rc: t/../r1T~/l rJe~ e,f~ ~ J ,.-", ::. y .l" ;r-e ..~ /' ¿.~.,< WATER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SANITARY SEWER . STORM DRAIN . CULVERTS . Il· Ie I I I I I I I , I I I I I I ~'... .. . .. DATE: PROJECT: I APAC-TEXAS, INC. FORT WORTH DIVISION December 17, 1986 JOB NO. 2910 Chapman Drive LOCATION: City Park North Richland Hills, Texas UNDER OUR CONTRACT WITH YOU DATED JULY 24, 19 85 FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT, YOUR SIGNATURE BELOW CONSTITUTES AUTHORITY FOR US TO PERFORM THE EXTRA WORK AS OUTLINED BELOW: QUANTITY TYPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED: UNIT PRICE TOTAL Lump Sum Excavate, 6 in. Lime Stabilized Subgrade at 30#/SY, Install 4 in. HMAC paving $12,500.00 $12,500.00 TIME CHARGES TO JOB: BY VIRTUE OF THIS EXTRA WORK ORDER, TIME TO COMPLETE THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT IS HEREBY INCREASED BY 18 WORK/ ~ DAYS. ACCEPTED & APPROVED: DATE: ORDER TAKEN BY: e¿~O~ E. E. Alfo Executive Vice President AUTHORIZED BY: C#AP~AN~~~~~e~~- ~~J'-~.¡a~ '3 ~ ¡9-t-.~ C!-. 0 C, D. ~ --- ------ /~/~ )Ç :-' '""" .; 70 ? 7 I " I-;~~ :~,. -KNO~l TON-ENGLlSH·-FlOWER~t INC. Ia --- -, - -- ~__CONS~Ll T:I~~ENC INE~~? /F~~ ~o!!~~lla~_ .----...------..,-----f--.--- -wT·i·----,----; ~. --P~RKS ~ R£C-REAT/ON ;PARK.tNGJ¡ LOT 1,---t--1-£- b.J.T £ MS:.. , ,. , f.. -.-.. ---+.1.~. --lJ. )JJ:,. t..!.-E;X" A ~A TJ 0 N : - ,\ - ." . '.7- i..... ... --+. .__'L.3 J.j ~u. J..'ids. . i I M9 ~ïA~JJ.B.Ga.A.AD€--.{fD'~.o...+-.30.Lb.s- ~¿.__' 'ì.l.2_S.~4L.._ ' . II : . . "\' (S-fø 2 íõ) ¡ ~ d ' -¡.3 ·1- -~- ---JJ "tM.. A..f:- ~ T; Y J> E 1) , I " 0 n S ,1..__. _ .7 L9 $ Cf.: YeS. .-_ __H. r~i--:~A~~.!-~¡;R~~~~6¡4~~A7ð,8e~~u.YA~e1J ~t~Qep~ ; [Ol~ ~NS.- , I ,,¿!."'7 ~ .-S.rAZ ...~~~!f.{7JAc.l./U..r7:tI1~4_~.þ j:'___.__~~_._...:__.~_____ ~__ ¡ -=:=--t~j~=-·~_-·l--L ! ! . : --L_~- _ .' -.;-- . _1-~t--·-¡----: : ~~--:.~~_-~.-_î-:-_:.:(,~l_~·~ ':;'...___-____._..__,._.:.~.-. . . -£·+=-1 ;-~_~_ 1-- ..! E~~.:t~::::; ¡ " - - - ---!--.--- "......--'T-----.-:.... - -. -I ¡ , . , I-~:----··_·· - I I --~----""'._~--.-..---- .(- -$.'-.'. .....,-....-. __L---~-.-- __ ¡ - "" . ---jl __. . ....____ - J. 1_ -- _:h_ :--! !' ' ~f=:'::~ .-.:-- ....J.._ ___._ . - ~ '_-,--..,_.~,~ . . . '" .~..._.._-~.......-._...~.~.... .- . '5" I j BÙILDII'J~ 2~' .-~ t t , ----.. _.,_._-,-~ .........---..--....--.... -..-",... "- . i . ¡ ~--_.__.__. t-·-····-·-·.. '- I ¡ t SI ' 90' -----------.--- .........,~.. ·r·····........·__ '¿O'x 20' DRIVt APPROACH SUlJfCT: t' ¿ç N 6. ..G".r7'" -=l'7? 99. JOI NO: 00 -- CLIENT: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Purchasing Council Meeting Date: 1-12-87 Emergency bid award to Orkin Pest Control for termite ubJect: extermination at proposed Library and Recreation Center Agenda Number: PU87-5 While conducting the final inspection of the asbestos abatement project, a termite infestation was discovered at the proposed library and recreation facility. Two pest control companies have confirmed a chronic infestation and recommend action while the present renovation effort is in progress. Both proposals cover the entire pier and beam structure, slab and exterior perimeter. Proposal Summary B & B Pest Control Orkin Pest Control $ 11,350.00 8,833.00 Recommendation : Emergency termite extermination treatment at proposed library and recreation center by Orkin Pest Control in the amount of $8,833.00. Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available in unspecified general CIP building funds allocated to the library/recreation facilities. Recommend $8,833.00 be transferred to: account number 13-50-85-4800 from: account number l3-00-99~6150 Finance Review Acct. Number 13-50-85-4800 unds Available . Finance Director I epartment Head Sign ture CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITE Page 1 of ~_:/. I Department: Public Works '~Ubject: Bridge Load Posting Agreement with State Highway Department, Resolution 87-1 Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GQJ~ev.) Sufficient Funds Available . Ope~tíñ9 BUdget. ~. ~---------. 'f'... .OY1er I '/T-=: ¡. /. /: =- ,~~ -_/~~~~¡; 1'~d:/?bV I . Department Head Signature I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I I ~ I I , ~ I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Council Meeting Date: 1-12-87 Agenda Number: PW 87-1 The State Highway Department conducted a survey of some bridges in the City several months ago and has recommended that a bridge on Watauga Road across Calloway Branch be posted for a ten thousand pound (10,000 lb) axle load limit. The attached agreement between the State and the City when properly executed by both parties will allow the State to give the "load limit" signs to the City to be put on Watauga Road. Construction on Watauga Road (Rufe Snow to Davis) is scheduled to begin in April 1988 and be completed in February 1990 during which time the bridge will be replaced and the load limit signs would be unnecessary. Reconnnendation: The staff recommends that the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the attached "Bridge Load Posting Agreement" and proceed with the installation of the signs on Watauga Road. Finance Review Rc{¡!jL~ , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I·' Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I \ . RESOLUTION NO. 87-1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The Mayor be, and is hereby, authorized to execute the attached agreement with the State of Texas (State Highway and Public Transportation Commission) as the act and deed of the City. PASSED AND APPROVED this 12th day of January, 1986. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I, Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER-DIRECTOR R. E. STOTZER, JR. --- ROBERT C. LANIER, CHAIRMAN ROBERT M. BASS RAY STOKER, JR. -.- P.O. Box 6868 Fort Worth, Texas 76115 December 17, 1986 IN REPLY REFER TO Mr. Don Dietrich Assistant Director Department of Public Works P.o. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Dear Mr. Dietrich: Reference is made to our letter of December 1, 1986 pertaining to the load posting of Off-System bridges. Attached are three copies of an agreement between the State of Texas and your agency that must be executed before the load posting signs may be ordered. Please execute all three copies of the agreement and return them to this office for further execution and distribution. Please attach copies of documentation from the City Secretary showing that the individual signing the agreement has been duly authorized by your office to enter into an agreement for your agency. If we can be of further assistance to you in this matter, please contact Mr. Weldon Jarratt of our Bridge Inspection and Evaluation Team at (817) 292-6510, Ext. 309. Sincerely yours, ~~ Joe W. Norwood District Planning Engineer WDJ:cv Attachments 181U\ 1986 StS~\l\t~~'~"\\'" I, .' .. - Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I .., -' 02 DIST. 220-N. RICHLAND HILLS (3050) CITY/COUNTY NUMBER BRIDGE LOAD POSTING AGREEMENT STATE OF TEXAS ) ( KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF TRAVIS ) ( THIS AGREEMENT, MADE, ENTERED INTO AND EXECUTED THIS DAY OF , 19 , BY AND BETWEEN THE STATE OF TEXAS ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE ENGINEER-DIRECTOR, WITH APPROVAL OF THE STATE HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, HEREINAFTER CALLED THE "STATE," AND CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS HEREINAFTER CALLED THE "LOCAL JURISDICTION". WIT N E SSE T H WHEREAS, THE STATE DESIRES TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTION CONCERNING THE INSTALLATION OF LOAD POSTING SIGNS ON BRIDGES WITHIN THE LOCAL JURISDICTION; A G R E E MEN T NOW, THEREFORE, THE STATE AND THE LOCAL JURISDICTION, IN CON- SIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS HEREIN CONTAINED, DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: THE LOCAL JURISDICTION AGREES TO ORDER LOAD POSTING SIGNS FROM THE STATE, THE STATE AGREES TO ADMINISTER FEDERAL FUNDS TO PROVIDE THE LOAD POSTING SIGNS AT NO COST TO THE LOCAL JURISDICTION, AND THE LOCAL JURISDICTION AGREES TO TAKE DELIVERY, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE SIGNS AS STATED IN THE SECTION TO FOLLOW. 1. SIGNS. THE LOCAL JURISDICTION HEREBY ORDERS THE FOLLOWING QUANTITIES OF SIGNS: SIGN RI2-2TB 4 EA. -- SIGN R12-2TC EA. SIGN Rl2-4TB EA. SIGN RI2-4TC EA. SIGN Wl2-5 4 EA. -- WEIGHT LIMITS FOR EACH PROPOSED SIGN SHALL BE AS LISTED IN ATTACHMENT A, "SIGN REQUIREMENTS," ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. 1 8-86 Ii. .' Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I 2~. SIGN SUPPORTS AND HARDWARE. IN ADDITION, THE LOCAL JURISDICTION .~ ""'HEREBY ORDERS THE FOLLOWING QUANTITIES OF SIGN SUPPORTS WITH APPROPRIATE HARDWARE, AND THE STATE HEREBY AGREES TO ADMINISTER FEDERAL FUNDS TO PROVIDE THE SIGN SUPPORTS AND HARDWARE AT NO COST TO THE LOCAL JURISDICTION. TREATED TIMBER POSTS 8 EA. -- 3. AUTHORIZATION. THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL PROPERLY AUTHORIZE ALL PROPOSED SIGNS BY ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE ACTION AND SHALL PROVIDE A COpy OF SUCH WHICH SHALL BE ATTACHED HERETO AND DESIGNATED ATTACHMENT B. 4. DELIVERY. THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL TAKE DELIVERY OF ALL PROPOSED SIGNS, SIGN SUPPORTS, AND HARDWARE AS AGREED UPON WITH THE APPROPRIATE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPOR- TATION DISTRICT OFFICE. 5. INSTALLATION AND DOCUMENTATION. THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL INSTALL ALL PROPOSED SIGNS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ATTACHMENT C, "LOAD POSTING SIGNS," AND ATTACHMENT D, "VERTICAL AND LATERAL CLEARANCES". THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL DOCUMENT THE INSTALLATION BY MARKING THE DATE STICKER AFFIXED TO THE BACK OF EACH SIGN. 6. NOTIFICATION AND INSPECTION. THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPOR- TATION DISTRICT OFFICE IN WRITING WITHIN l5 DAYS AFTER ALL PROPOSED SIGNS HAVE BEEN PROPERLY INSTALLED. THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL ALLOW THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TO PERFORM ON-SITE INSPECTION OF THE INSTALLED SIGNS AND SHALL ADJUST ANY SIGNS THAT ARE FOUND TO BE IMPROPERLY INSTALLED. 7. MAINTENANCE. THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL KEEP THE INSTALLED SIGNS CLEAN, LEGIBLE, AND OPEN TO THE VIEW OF APPROACHING MOTORISTS FOR AT LEAST lSO FEET. THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL REINSTALL SIGNS THAT HAVE BEEN KNOCKED DOWN BY VANDALISM, TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS, OR OTHER CAUSES. 8. STATE RESPONSIBILITY. THE APPROPRIATE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OFFICE AGREES TO PROVIDE THE LOCAL JURISDICTION WITH REASONABLE CONSULTATION ASSISTANCE IN ACCOMPLISHING THE OBJECTIVES OF THIS AGREEMENT. 9. STATE INDEMNIFIED. THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL SAVE HARMLESS THE STATE FROM ALL CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES DUE TO ACTIVITIES OF THE LOCAL JURISDICTION, ITS AGENTS, OFFICIALS, OR EMPLOYEES PERFORMED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT AND WHICH RESULT FROM AN ERROR, OMISSION, OR NEGLIGENT ACT OF THE LOCAL JURISDICTION, ITS AGENTS, OFFICIALS, OR EMPLOYEES. THE LOCAL JURISDICTION SHALL ALSO SAVE HARMLESS THE STATE FROM ANY AND ALL EXPENSES, INCLUDING ATTORNEY FEES WHICH MIGHT BE INCURRED BY THE STATE IN LITIGATION OR OTHERWISE RESISTING SAID CLAIMS OR LIABILITIES. 2 8-86 I'. ,. 1 (}~. · 01 SPUTES. SHOULD 0 I SPUTES ARI SE UNDER THI S CONTRACT, THE STATE'S -- DECISION SHALL BE FINAL A~JD BINDING. 11. Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLIANCE. WITH REGARD TO WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT, THE LOCAL JURISDICTION, IN COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (49CFR21 AND 23CFR710.405), EXECUTIVE ORDERS 11246 AND 11375 REGARDING EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, AND REGULATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR (41CFR60), SHALL NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE GROUNDS OF RACE, COLOR, SEX, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN. 12. INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS. THE FEDERAL HIGill~AY ADMINISTRA- TION, THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, AND THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, OR ANY DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES THEREOF, SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO ANY BOOKS, DOCUMENTS, PAPERS, AND RECORDS WHICH ARE DIRECTLY PERTINENT TO THIS CONTRACT FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AUDITS, EXAMINATIONS, EXCERPTS, AND TRANSCRIPTIONS. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE STATE AND THE LOCAL JURISDICTION HAVE EXECUTED DUPLI~ATE COUNTERPARTS OF THIS AGREEMENT. THE LOCAL JURISDICTION THE STATE OF TEXAS BY: CERTIFIED AS BEING EXECUTED FOR THE PURPOSE AND EFFECT OF ACTIVATING AND/OR CARRYING OUT THE ORDERS, ESTABLISHED POLICIES, OR WORK PROGRAMS HERETOFORE APPROVED AND AUTHORIZED BY THE STATE HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION: AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL NAME BY: TITLE DISTRICT ENGINEER DISTRICT DATE DATE 3 8-86 I,· · \ . · I_ I " I' u.. 0 I " I- lJ.J I LLJ :c: V') I I I -- I Co, ~ ~ I ....... ~ I f4 < "t ~ I ~ \) I* I ~ ....... I ~ z 0 Þ-4 I .... u ..... c I-~ ct: u I c -I i ." ~ · \...-,,;' '-' &on -0 I . - ~ N ocr ..... ZOJ 3 a:: '"C - . c- OQ) z a:: . ~ U LLI UJ t- O ...J ~ Z >< c(<( I l- N . .-4 ex; V") V) 0 ex: C) -0 - . C- OW z ex: cr: ..0 O~ t- L&.J ~ La.J C -J Z I >< ex:: C:X:I- N ..... ~ V') V') 0 0:: ~ '"0 U - l- . e- N OQJ Z 0:: I N ~ .-4 LLJ L.LJ ~ C ...J Z >< c(<( t- -c .. ~ .c · cr I- OQJ N Z ex: I N 0:: ~ ..... 0::= ~ a:: I.J.J ~ UJC ..J z ~f xCC c::(t- " (A Z ~ 0 ..... l- t LLJ«a:: ~ <.!) U UJ CÞ-41~ \.\ ~u. ~ ~ :::> , CQ ..... Z \\) Z La.J (j C ..... \Q ~ en I- Z « ~'- .....W zc:: LLJ...... ~:::> :x:C1 ~~ I- ~~ ...... V") ~ U Q) So- S- O U C1J '" +oJ ro 10 C "'0 Q) .,... Cot- .r- s... Q) > c:: Q) Q) .J::J C/) res .r:. en ~ c: C1J E OJ So- . ,... ::) .... 0- res QJ s.. U c:: \t- en '+- .r- e en c: C+- O 0 +-J ...,a U '" .,.. -0 r- V) .... Q) s.. > =' 0 'J .D ro ~ ,., Q) u .c 0 ... -' I' : . Þ I·. ~ .' . ' Ie I I I I I I A Weight Limit sign shall be located just ahead of the bridge in each direction of travel. Six feet from the abutment is a good I location if the bridge is on an unpaved or low-speed road. This distance should be increased if the bridge i3 on a high-speed road. ie I I I I I I The Load Zone Bridge sign should be used to warn of a bridge with a posted weight restriction. The sign should be placed so as to allow the driver of an overweight vehicle to detour around the I bridge. It is also recommended that a WEIGHT LIMIT sign be placed beside or 100 feet behind each advance warning sign. Ie I WEIGHT LI M IT AXLE OR TANDEM :,~:i ;f:~, f';; r;'~~ L OS " .....'..~... # ,,'.. rWEIGHT ': : LIMITS ; GROSS ¡ ..:,', ~~:' .',::," ::~'. ..?:.~ ! , ,'-'.. " '0.. ,,:... LBS I :~.:: .~~: ,,\~,' '-':;-' "~i! WEIGHT LIMIT TANDEM AXLE AXLE OR TANDEM ~~ :,~::\ if :.': :'.:.~:. ::.\,: L 8 S i: ~:,:-i,: ~V,: \\t :,:.) , : :':)~{:~:f{¡~[n~a~:': LBS ...... "., "., ".11' \".. ¡ .-.....- -. .- ~ _ _._ _ _ _ 4 . 12·2Tb .'2·2Tc . 12-4TI» 24". 42- 24" . 36"· 24- . 36- WEIGHT LIMIT SIGNS W12·' 36" . 36" ADVANCE WARNING SIGN ATTACHMENT C - Load posting Signs ~ WEIGHT ~. I LIMITS GROSS "~~I [n': :'t~': rt::1 ftt LBS : '~~., \~~ '~:' '::' ':~I TANDEM ! AXLE ; '~:)g::!(t~:[n:[?~;': LBS : ......; .:~. ':~' .~:.' \~"',,' J ~ .'2-4Tc 2.- . 42'" It:~ .,. .. . f I - I I I I I I Edge of the traveled I surface (including paved shoulder if present) . I I I I I I.. I I- I -EIGHT liMn AILE OR . TAHOIM ; ..~': W Not less than 2' . t:;...- . i- t ,. . r . 'lJ'1..' , I I I , . t . I I I I ~'{}. [LI. _.L L --L~ _LoS- _~.I- _ ~ - - ~-r - - - - -,._,..J! . I I I \c .Þ J \:.þJ , ,.: « tI) C1) Q) r-f s.n C to .c' +J .e.J o z WEIGHT LIMIT SIGNS 2' - 6 II ,.tin imum embedment þ 6' to 12' ** I .' ¡ .EIGHT LIMn AXLE OR tANDEM ~.'!.:.: us « (1) en Q) ..... Ln C 4J It1 0- .c Z ¿J 2' - 6" Minimum embedment * This dimension should be a minimum of 71 in business or resi- dential areas where parked vehicles may block the sign. ADVANCE WARNING SIGN This dimension may be reduced to a minimum of 2' in business or residential areas. ATTACHMENT D - Vertical 'and Lateral Clearances .,. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Utility Council Meeting Date: 1-12-87 Change Order No. 1 - Glenview Drive Utility Adjustment Contract Agenda Number: PW 87-2 ~ As you know, the Council has received and approved the bids for the utility adjustments on Glenview Drive. The contract was let to Lowell B. Allison Construction. Since that time Lone Star Gas Company has contacted the City and told us that we could not lay a waterline in their 25' easement which is behind the north curb line at Glenview Drive. The City Manager has sent a strong letter of protest to Lone Star Gas Company (attached) but we have not had any response from that letter. The only other alternative that we have in constructing this line is to put it under the pavement however, this is going to create extra cost for the project. In order to eliminate anymore delay on this project, the staff recommends that you approve change order #1 to this project. Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available in the Utility Unspecified Utility CIP Funds, but will require a transfer as outlined below. From: To: 02-09-99-6700 02-09-68-4200 $21,214.00 $21,214.00 Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of change order #1 in the amount of $21,213.02 to Lowell B. Allison Construction, Inc. and amend the budget from the Glenview Project as outlined above. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating dget ~eOther ./ I x Finance Review Acct. Number See above SU~fiCient~s Available ~ 7l!~ [/_.:~~v'vI(~///;t~{) /1 \ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director 1 Page 1 of V I, e I ,I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas ,] an u a r y 6, 1 9 87 Honorable Mayor and City Council C i t Y 0 f r'10 r t h R; c h 1 and H i 11 s 7301 n.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-552, CITY OF nORTH RICHLAtJD HILLS GLENVIEW DR., PH. II, UTIL. AOJ. CH,AJ~GE ORDER NO. 1 Enclosed is Change Order No.1 to the referenced project \~hich has been signed by the Contractor, Lowell B. Allison, and which we are recommending for your consideration of approval. This change order covers the cost of moving the proposed water line relocation in Glenv;ew Drive from close proximity to a 16-inch high pressure gas line, which ;s in the parkway north of the future back-af-curb, to a new location under the future pavement south of the proposed curb line. This change is required because Lone Star Gas Company has decided nat to let North Richland Hills use its easement for the water line relocation (see attached letter dated December 24, 1986, for a full explanation ·of the Lone 'star Gas requirement). Approval of this change order is also contingent upon approval by the Richland Hills City Council to have this Harth Richland Hills' water line loca,ted within the R;chland Hills' City limits. \;Ie understand that this item is included on the Richland Hills Council agend for consideration of approval on the same night as the tJRH Council meeting, January 12,1987. He will be available at the January 12 Council r·1eeting to anS\'Jer any questions you might have on this project. w.~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, .P.E. R~:A/ r a Enclosures c c . or", r. Den n isH 0 r vat h , Ass i s tan t C i t Y ¡·,1 an ag e r /r.1r. Gene Riddle, Director of Public \·.!orks . t·'1r. Don Dietrich, Assistant Public ~Jorks Director t1r. Richard Royston, Director .of Planning 11 r. Lee 1'1 an e s s, 0 ire c tor 0 f F; n an c e t'1 r. B i 11 Rut 1 e d g e, C i t Y Ins p e c tor' Hr. Roger Hokanson, Richland Hills Dir. Pub. Works r·1 r. Lowe l' B . A 11 i so n, Con t r act 0 r 1901 CENT,RAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of ~orth ~icWand Hills 3!1~ ~ f h qK I _ ~~,~ ~tar 0 t e·l,,~etrop ex IIJ ~ ¡ r= OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER December 30, 1986 REF: CML 118-86 Mr. Gary Cumbie Vice President, Ft. Worth Division Lone Star Gas Company 908 Monroe Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Dear Mr. Cumbie: This letter is to register with you my strong displeasure and protest regarding the way your Engineering Department failed to handle its responsibilities regarding a utility relocation project in Glenview Drive, which is the boundary line between North Richland Hills and Richland Hills. The attached letter from our Engineer, Mr. Richard Albin, details the efforts he put forth to attempt to coordinate this project with the Lone Star Gas Company and the abysmal failure of your company to handle its responsibilities. It is unconscionable that the City of North Richland Hills will be delayed and caused inestimable additional costs for this badly needed street improvement, considering Mr. Albin's efforts to attempt to provide effective coordination. North Richland Hills rate payers should not have to pay the additional costs of relocating our water main under the street, since your easement is reportedly capable of accommodating our water main. However, it view of your company's handling of this project I think it will be better in the long run if we keep our main as far away as possible from any Lone Star Gas facility. (817) 281-0041 I 7301 N, E. lOOP 820 I P. O. BOX 18609 I NORTH RICHlAND HilLS, TEXAS 76180 l- Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page Two By copy of this lètter I am requesting that Mr. Albin, in the future, send a copy of any and all correspondence with Lone Star Gas, especially your Engineering Division, to Mr. Al Singletary with the hope that he can follow up from your end to avoid further mishaps of this nature. This shouldn1t be necessary, but I am hoping that it may be helpful. Very truly yours, 1</1/~~ Rodger N. Line City Manager RNL/gp cc: Al Singletary Richard Albin ~ W.O. Weisbruch -~~~ ¡I.~ ~ã ~v '&0.'-' &, 8(/ / S.)'..J tL'tr¿I!ß,.t1-~-.,. /; ./UãLl~1 f1[. I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Utility 1/12/87 ubject: Council Meeting Date: Big Bear Creek Wastewater Interceptor System Contract Agenda Number: PW 87-3 Between City of North Richland Hills, Trinity River Authority and Three Other Cities This is a contract between four cities including North Richland Hills and the Trinity River Authority for the purpose of financing and installing the Big Bear Creek Interceptor sewer line. In the extreme north end of the City of North Richland Hills there is approximately 130 acres that falls into the Big Bear watershed and we will need to purchase .80 per cent capacity in that line to serve this 130 acres. The estimated dollar amount of the City's responsibility is $83,200. Although the percentage capacity that would belong to North Richland Hills is known, the exact dollar amount required will not be determined until TRA lets the construction contract. Therefore, it is requested that $90,000 be allocated as indicated above. Funding Source Sufficient funds are available in Utility Fund Retained Earnings and would require a tran~fer as indicated below: From: 02-00-00-0599 $90,000 $90,000 To: 02-11-02-4926 Recommendation The staff recommends approval of the contract between the City of North Richland Hills and the Trinity River Authority and the other three cities involved. It is further recommended that the operating budget be amended as indicated above with the final funding requirement to be dètermined after the contract is awarded. The amount not to exceed $90,000 without further Council action. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number See above Bonds (GO/Rev.) -X- SUffi~reundS~.i~4~abr::le, Operating Budget / P'1a Other . Finance Director fk~ L~ - IfI1 Department Head Signature I 1 \:city Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works 1/12/87 Council Meeting Date: Subject: Proposed Amendment - Change Orders 5 through 11 for 1985 Miscellaneous Water & Sewer Improvements to Lowell B. Allison Contract in the Amount of $37,518 Agenda Number: PW 87-04 The attached pay estimate number 6 includes several change order items which are detailed in letters from Richard Albin and Lowell B. Allison. The additional work not included in the original contract totals $12,633.67 and the additional quantities of materials for change orders 5 through 11 total $24,884.03. Therefore the total amount requested for the amended contract is $37,517.70 (see attached letters for documentation). Funding Source Sufficient funds are available in unspecified Utility CIP funds. The requested appropriation is outlined as follows: From: . 02-01-99-6700 $37,518 $37,518 To: 02-01-27-6700 Reconnnendation It is recommended that change orders 5 through 11 be approved in the amount of $37,517.70 and the budget amended as indicated above. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number see above Sufficient unds Available REV , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I·· I . I- I I I I I I .. I I . I I I I I f I K NOWL TON-E NG LI S H-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas Lee /IA A-¡J et; ~ January 7, 1987 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: 3-554, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MISCELLANEOUS WATER & SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.6 Enclosed is one copy of Contractorls Partial Pay Estimate No.6, dated Januarÿ 7, 1987, made payable to Lowell B. Allison, in the amount of $66,116.41, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of December 27,1986. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Larry D. Jones, as indicated by his signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. This pay request includes several change order items and quantities which are detailed on the attached letter from Lowell Allison, dated December 27, 1986. Most of the extra work noted is for additional quantities associated with existing contract pay items. The net cost of the increased quantities for these items totals $24,884.03. Additional work for items not included in the contract totals $12,633.67 for a grand total change order amount of $37,517.79. The additional quantities for change order numbers 5 through 11, in amount of $24,884.03, are included in the existing pay quantities on the attached estinate form, (itens 1 through 41), and the remaining $12,633.67 is included in a new pay item, no. 48. The change orders included in this estimate are outl ined below: Change Order No.5: Changes on Lynda Lane and Galway, including extra time spent locating end of existing main which was not where it was supposed to be. Total = $2,750.10. Extra time requested = 2 days. Change Ordèr No.6: City requested tie-in of 8-inch water line not shown on plans at Timber Lane. Total = $1,489.38. Extra time requested = 1 day. . Change Order No.7: Saddles required for service taps on 24-inch and 8-inch water lines not provided for in the plans. Total = $2,082.52. Change Order No.8: Changes due to redesign and rerouting of 24-inch water 1 i ne between H ightovler Dr ive and Eden Road. Th is change was made in order to 1901 CENT~AL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I~' Ie I I I I I· I- I r' . .. I I I I I' I I f I January 7, 1987. MISC. W & SEWER ESTIM. NO.6 Page 2 reroute the 24-inch line through a new proposed subdivision, the Eden Addition, located west of Eden Road and south of Hightower. Some of the costs associated with this particular change order can be recovered from the developer. These reimbursable items will be identified on the final estimate. Total = $8,522.25. Extra time requested = 3 days. Choange Order No., 9: Time spent trying to locate exist.ing 24-inch water 1 ine in, or near Hightower Drive which was not where it was supposed to be. Also, subsequent repair of lawns, etc., in parkway, located by City approximately 340 feet west. Total = $1,080. Extra time requested = 2 days. .Change Order No. 10: Extra 24-inch pipe required on Hightower Drive for the missing section of pipe which was thought to be installed in 1974, by private developer, but never was. Total = 19,394.69. Extra time requested = 8 days. Change Order No. 11: Re-route of 12-inch water line in Davis Blvd. because of conflict with a new 8-inch sanitary sewer main which was constructed in the same vicinity as the proposed water line. Total = $2,198.76. Extra time requested = 2 days. . Approval by the Council of this pay estimate shall constitue approval of the change orders listed above. Also, included is approval of the time extensions requested by the Contractor. We recommend that this partial payment, in amount of $66,116.41, be made to Lowell B. Allison, 3725 Flory, Fort Worth, Texas 76180. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council r~eeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. ~~ P.E. RWA/lld Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Larry Jones, City Inspector eCIP Water and Sewer) ? t~r. Lee t~aness, Director of Financ.e Lowell B. Allison -_. -- - C. Q N.T RAe TOR .' S EST. I.. MAT E Page 1 of 2 I~ Est imate No. .6 _._.____. .__.- Job No. 3-554_ - .. ----- .h_.____________.Date: _. ___7-DEC~1986 File No.-F3554.W Cal. Days: 153 IIproject Description: MISCELLANEOUS WATER & SEWER W.O. Date: 20-JUL-1986 e- - .-- .. SYSTEM -IMPROVEMENTS_- - Scheduled Completion .Date: -- 20-DEC-1986 For Materials Furnished and Labor ICon tractor: Lowell B. All ison Perfot"med in Pet" iod Ending: 27-DEC-1986 Owner:_City- of. North Richland--Hills .-------------Time..Charsed --Thru--Pet~iad -<Days) =-_________ _._.. ____ 160- Place: North Richland Hills -------- ----- -- - - - - - - - ~Q. I' 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION ...- PREVIOUS THIS UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOT AL .- UNIT PRICE AMOUNT --------------------~--~---- ----------- -----~--- ~~---~--- -----~----- --------.---- -1.24" Dia. D.I. Water Pipe . L.F. 5059.00 620.00 5679.00-- -$34.56 $196266.24 2. 12" Dia. D.I. 'Water Pipe L.F. 282.00 0.00 282.00 19.80 5583.60 3. 8" Dia. D. I. Watet" Pipe L. F. 900.00 0.00 900.00 28.25 25425. 00 4. 6"_Dia. D. I. Water Pipe .- -.-- L.F. - 12.00 0.00 12.00-- ._ 11.34 136.08 5. 12". Dia.· PVC Watet" Pipe L. F. 2680.00 0.00 2680.00 15.30 41004.00 6. 8" Dia. PVC Watet" Pipe L. F. 400.00 453.00 853.00 8.56 7301.68 I·-·~: ··~~IID~~~i~~~~~:t~~ï~;P:-4-:,B-~~· ~Å~H- --- .80~:~~- --.-23~:~~ -. 103~:g~ ------ ·888~:~~ 756~:~~ 9. 811 Gate Valve Ie Box EACH 5.00 1.00 6.00 422.65 2535.90 10. .. 6 '-~--Gat e.--Val ve 8c Box- -------- ----.---- --- EACH. " --- 12.00 --- .--- ---- 6. 00 --- - 18.00 - --- -.- 281.41 .'- - 5065.38 11.1. 2" Gate Valve ßc Box EACH. 0.00 1.00 1.00 100.58 100.58 12. 24")(16" Tapping Sleeve Valve EACH 1.00 0.00 1.00 4391.28 4391.28 .-13.'--12!'-xI2'!--.Tapp ing - Sleeve -Va I ve--EACH----3.. 00---0. 00--------3..00-----2000..90__ 6002. 70.-- I 14. 811)(8" Tapping Sleeve Valve EACH 1.00 0.00 1.00 1088.19 1088.19 15. 6")(6" Tapping Sleeve Valve EACH 3.00 0.00 3.00 862.42 2587.26 16. Ductile Iron Fi tt in9s-. - ..-.-.--- .. .TON .----- -. 17.59---- -- --- 4. 39 - -- ---·21.98-----2150..70-.-_ __ __ 47274.54-- M. Bore or Tun. 36"Steel Casing L.F. 180.00 0.00 180.00 214.00 38520.00 . Ðore or Tun. 24"Steel Casing L.F. 195.00 0.00 19~.OO 115.56 22534.20 --.-. 9.-Z!Comb--Ait~e~__VaLvE!--&-VauLt-EACH -0..-00- 4.-00 4.-00 1266-...8~ .5067---52-- 20.. Fire Hydrants EACH 7.00 2.00 9.00 615.25 5537.25 II 21. Short D~uble Water serv~ce EACH 5.00 3.00 8.00 283.55 226~.40 . - - 22. -Short -Slngle- Water - Servlce--- - EACH. - . ..------0.00-----2.00.- -.- - -- -- 2. 00------:--246.10_____ _ 49:....20.-- 23. Asphalt Pavement Replacement L.F. . 0.00 -164.00 -164.00 8.35 -1369.40 I 24. Concrete Driveway Replacement L.F. 0.00 55.50 55.50 15.73 873.02 . 25.... Sawc ut... Remova 1- -- .--- ----- L. F . ------0. 00---353.-00 -- --- -353. 00----0.-86.-----303. .58-- 26. Concrete Encasement L.F. 130.00 50.00 180.00 14.98 2696.40 1 ;~:î~~~~~W~~R T;;~C~a~~;:w:~~p~;e ~~~~ _._..___.~:~~----___- ~:~~.---_._. _.~:~~ __.____~~~:~~-----~2~:~~_ 29. '81' PVC (DR 35) San. Sewer Pipe L.F. 0.00 333.00 333.00 2.89 962.37 .30. Bore or Tun. 16"Steel Casing L.F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1-.31-.--Trencn. Excavat ion~O!.~ó!----L..F 0.-00 333..00-333..00 . 4..82 -1605...06- 32. Trench Excavation, 6'-8' L.F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 33. Trench Excavation, 8'-10' L.F. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.34. -Tr~nc:h Excavation, 10'-12~.. L.F. 0.00- -0.00 - ·0.00. -'----- _"_h 0.00---.-... -.0.00- 35. Std. Type "A" Manhole EACH 0.00 2.00 2.00 727.60 1455.20 36. Sanitary Sewer Cleanout EACH 0.00 1.00 1.00 149.80 149.80 I .---. ----------. ------- .-. - TOTAL THIS PAGE : II ft-- I ~-------- ------------- - - ---- - - ..------ ____ "._ _ _ ._ a_. . ~- ----"--..-... - - --.. -_...-- .. .__.--.- ---._- ..- -~- $433544.99 -....._-----~_.-....... ---. ._.- ... -....- .--.- - --.-... - - -. _.- _. .- - ... - -- - - .... .. . .. --.-.,. ---- ---. ...... .. -. --...---.------ --.__ --- . ._..., - __.___ . __~ ·_6____._.___ __ CON T R AC TOR·' 5 EST I MAT E. Pase 2 of 2 ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~~t imate NO.--H- ----- -.-.-,6-----__H ... Job No. 3-554 __ -__nHH.. ¡ile No. F3554.W roject Description: MISCELLANEOUS WATER & SEWER . SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS For Ion tractor: Lowell B. Allison wner: City of -North-Rlchland--Hills---.----------_..---..Time Place: North Richland Hills . ... _.-------Date:_______ ..--_ 7-DEC-1986. Cal. Days: 153 W.O. Date: 20-JUL-1986 Scheduled Comp let ion Date: - - 20-DEC-1986 Materials Furnished and Labor Performed in Period Ending: 27-DEC-1986 Charsed .Thru Period .(Days): -. ---- -.. ...--.-160 10. ITEM DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS THIS - UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL UNIT PRICE _ . AMOUNT -----~----------~-~~-------~ ----~-~-- -~------- ----~---- ----------- ------~~--- 137. E:<t t'ð Depth fer -Manhole L.F.-- . 0.00 0.00 O. 00 - $0.00 - .. .$0. 00 38. Misc. Plumbing Allowance L.S. 0.174 0.00 0.174 10000.00 1740.00 39. 2"Dia. Sch. 40 PVC Wa t et" Line L~F. 0.00 8.00 8.00 2.60 20.80 140. Fir'e Hydrant Tr"ans fet" -.- - EACH-- 0.00 1.00 1.00 321. 00. _0 .~ 321.00 41. lS11 Cl. 50 D.I. L.F. 2760.00 0.00 2760.00 29. 10 80316.00 42. C.O.it - Washed Rock C.Y. "23.82 0.00 23.82 18.00 428.76 143. c. O. #1 -~- 24!~- -But~ter-fly -Valve--- EACH---- -- 2. 00 __ ---·--·..0.00 -- -- 2. 00 ---~--- ---- 6081 . 00 ..- 12162.00 44. C.D.ll - Bore & Grout L.F. 110.00 0.00 110.00 212.00 23320.00 45. C.O.ll - 1211 G.V. & Box EACH 1.00 0.00 1 . Q() 870.00 870.00 46. C.O.ll- ~ Inst. 12:<8 Tee -& .VIv. EACH.-- -----.3.00 .. 0.00 ·3.00 .---- 310.00 - _. 930.00 14.7. C.O.#l - Add. Pt" es S Ut' e Test L.S. 1.00 0.00 1.00 425.00 425.00 48. C.O.I 5-11, EXTRAS L.S. 0.00 1.00 1.00 12633.67 12633.67 ---------- ---."- --.- ---------.-------. . Ir~~~~-~~~~~~~~;~~~-~~-~~~-~~~~;~~~~---------------------~;;~~~~~;--------------------------- -and Conf irmat·ion ·-·of .Pay- Quant it .ies------------------ ---------------.-- Knowl ton-EnSl ish~~lowers,--.Inc.._...---. _-~--~._J)ø.ÂP-r ~--._-- -u,------___BY~~~{jj:-~-- ~Owner's Project Representative) (Project Manaser) late: . 019~- ------~.---- -------- Date:-- - __u__;)"~ ,--.7 I~~=~=----------------==~=~==~~--~~~.=~====~:_~-=-~~---===---~~~:-=-===~~_=__~~~_=_=-. Total · · . . . . . . . . . . . . . $566712.22 Less Percent (X) Retained. . 5~ 28335.61 -.----...-------- D i ffet'ence-....- e__---e--....- ... . ---...- ...---___.--~..- .---.-.- -------53837 ó. 61 Plus (X) Materials on Hand 90h 11906.10 Total · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 550282.71 Less.P~evious_Payment.s 484166..30- Difference Due This Estimate $66116.41 (Note: Pay Last Amount Shown) ========== I--=~-=-~~- ~:..:--==::.=--:..=-==:..==:=-===:..:..:..=.::-:..:..-:..~:.. -----:..--------------------:.-:...------------:..-:..:..:..:..--:..:..~=--..:.-----:..=:..-.=- - 019$7- fOTA~ ~:~~~3;~;~- T~I_:..~O~~~ TOTAL SEWER COST THIS MONTH f-$4080.-Z1-- lIlat al Earn ings.__< Incl.--Retain.J. ~--__--_$5667.12. 22-____ Bi d:- _. --$529592. 61 ----Percent.:-____--107 __-01_ lIime Charged Thru This Period: 160 Time: 153 Percent: 104.58 1 .- I I . ~.- '"--. ---.... .~_. ----...- ..-... .--... -.- - --.._- ,'- -- - .-.- ---.--.. ... - _. -_._-... --- _. ---- - - -.. .-.--. -.--. _. -- __._ __ 4__"_ ___ __ .__._ -" ..... ~.- - - ._-- - . - - - - - -- -- ---- --- -- - ---- ---- -..--.. ---.-------... -.-- ------ -...----- .-.--- -.- - ._. - ---.. - --"- ... -,- I~- (BLANK FORM - For Use in .Submitting Next Month's Request for Payment) '0- _._.._____ caN T R· ACT 0- R ' 5 EST I MAT E -- -- .-----.-- ---- ".------ ----------...------- Pase 1 of 2 - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ------------..----- -----....-...-----.-----.. ~~!~~ate'No. 6 Job No. 3-554 Date: .je~~· D~;~~i~~i-on:MISCELLANEOUS WÀTER - &-SE-WER---------u - ----------- ~à:--~:~~~----20.::JÜL-i ;~~- I SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Scheduled Completion Date: 2-DEC-1986 For Materials Furnished and Labor .. _. _.._._-~._..-----.._<------..._--- _..._-_.__.~_.- Contractor: Lowell B. Allison Performed in Period Ending: f~_;=~~__~~;~~:~i~~î;~d R~~~~:nd Hills ________T~me_C~~r~.e~ _~~~_u:~~~~~~~:~: ______________ PREVIOUS THIS UNIT -rD. ITEM DESCRIPTION _ UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL- PRICE .-=-~-- --:-:--:------:--~-:-=-~----==--:.~-==---===-:--=--:__. -==--=--~ -~--==~--=-:- - ~~~------ - -:-:-~-~:---:-- --~--_-:~~=~-=-- --:-=-:-:=--=--:-:- 1. 24" Dia.D.I. Water Pipe L.F. 5059.00 1-3~-~f."p~i~D~Ì~~-W:}~~r p~~~ E:~-:-~~~~Ö~ 4. 6" Dia. D. I. Water Pipe L. F. -12.00 I_ 5._12". Dia.!...!3'C_Water ?ie.~__b£.._2þSO_·Q9. 6. 8" Dia. PVC Water Pipe 7. 6" Dia. PVC Water Pipe 8. 24" Horiz.Gate Valve 8< 4t1Box 1-9 :-S"Gate Vai ve & Box 10. 6" Gate Valve & Box 11.-2" Gate Valve & Box ---'--------- ------ 112. 24"x1611 Tapping Sleeve Valve 13. 12"x12" Tappins Sleeve Valve __~~ S"xB" Tapping Sleeve Valve If~ 611X6" Tapping Sleeve Valve Ductile Iron Fittings ~ Bore or Tun. 36"SteeI Casing "ië:-BoreorTùn. 24';Steel Casing 119. ·2"Comb. Air ReI.Valve !c Vault ___~O. Fire H~drants 21. Short Double Water Service 122. Short Single Water Service 7~~_ ~_~p_b~_~ ~_~ ~yement R~e.l acement 24. Concrete Driveway Replacement 25. Sawcut Removal 1[26. Concrete Encasement 27. San. Sewer Trench Span for a" 28. 10"PVC (DR 35) San.Sewer Pipe 1.29..!-SII PVç__ <DR 35) San. Sewer Piee 30. Bore or Tun. ló"Steel Casing . 31. Trench Excavation, 0'-6' 1-~~:-~~:~~~u~~~:~:{1~~: ~:=~~, 34. Trench Excavation, 10'-12' I;~:--·~~~ ~ t~~~es~~~-M¿i:~~~ut TOTAL THIS PAGE I ----------- ------- ____u._____ ---0- f- ---- I L.F. 400.00 L.F. 801.00 EACH 0.00 EACH . 5.00 EACH 12.00 EACH O. _00 EACH 1.00 EACH 3.00 EACH 1.00 EACH 3.00 TON 17.59 L.F.. 180.00 L.F. 195.00 EACH 0.00 EACH 7.00 EACH "5.00 EACH 0.00 L.F. 0.00 -¡ j =" -- --- -- -- -- L. F. f'I (.: O. 00 L. F . o. 00 L.F. 130.00 EACH 0.00 L.F. 0.00 L.F. 0.00. L. F . O. 00 L.F. 0.00 ~. F ! 0 . 00__ L.F. 0.00 L.F. 0.00 ~AGtI___9~_QQ EACH 0.00 t/ '2 í() + 3Lf-O C) c) c·, () ?,I¿ 9 + }'!,~ ') C) + 1 o~ t..') ~, t , 'L + 4- I ú o C f.. ., r" . I ~ + Lf. :«11 o Ð 4- o~';... 3 'L ./ q G: - '2..(,0 '35.S-+zo I bO ~ ~~t;ß 10-l,-/-0 '"' +- f o 333 o ~~ -7, (.J o o 1-' '- ~ 1 S 3·3 '3 2t~~ ~CIO t 1 '¿ '", F- ( "7 'L 9 [, i() (~'" ç $34.56 $ 19.80 -- . - - ~-- -- 28.25 11.34 15.30 .. --- ....---.... --~---~ 8.56 7.28 8881.00 422.65 281.41 100.58 ----.-- 4391.28 2000.90 1088.19 862.42 2150.70 214.00 115.56 1266.88 615.25 -"--'------ -- 283.55 246.10 a.35 15.73 0.86 14.98 ~ 123.05 0.00 ~.89 0.00 4.82 Q_. 00 0.00 0.00 7_77 . 60 149.80 ;4- , I 3 I ~ ;7,14- 160 195- 4"- 7 ~ ~ ' 2- 9(· 3 5 . .,- bo~~ f 4-D CJ o .s~r~ (:? -i~~ () l..~ () ~ -----.- - _.__..~._------ ---.-----..- ..---- -----..-------.- -'-- AMOUNT , c Lí L' - 6'4' C) ~~ I':> .- 55~j.~ -2 ";> 41l S ':-'<2 f ~ b ~f 4 f C' ('74.. (. :l_ ¿. Z4ð ..~ t.... C' 4 L q_~ o '2.lc3·~ _3 9 j 9 ~~ ,oe,?''£' -4·39 ~ (, c02 ~~ I 0 8f~ f~ 2';8'1 ~ 3 e J 5 3 41- .; l,., S- 2 c" '.:~ "22. 5"34 ..~ . !i'O{.,7 51:- 43 é)C..,. ~ 2 i¿ (.. [, '1.£ 49:L u.-:... E c~ I ~ '-.!... 5 ç(J 4:1.. ~IB ~~ 20Q7 ~ () (~ 96 Z 'fl o i'~ 0 S'" ,-::.. C~ C"J CJ l 4-'?'7~:- , 4- 9 f~-' 6l:- $ 4" E, (,£'o - ~ µ ûp~G o ~Cì e,(;.. -(",)~ ,·tít it E'~-__h - ---------------------_____ - r~.¡ II; 81 1-- (BLANK FORM - For Use in Submitting Next Month's Request for Payment) C C·N T R'A C T O'R ' S EST I MAT E Page 2 of 2 - - _.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~ -...----....--.---------.------------------------.---- -----~._-.-. .-.--. ... --------_._--_....~--_.._----..__._--_...... -- -------- Iktimate No. 6 Job No. 3-554 Date: »e~i ~-D~~~~{~~ ion :11-1 ~~~~~~Nî~~~~~~~~~T~-SEWER- ----~:~::u :~:- co~~ 1 ~~I !~-~:~:-: --_n2~=~~~= ~-:~:-- II -J For Materials Furnished and Labor .. - _. ._-. -- ... -. ,. . -- --..-..- ._-~--_._.. - ...- _._. -- .....-.... ~----_._- -------. Contractor: Lowell B. Allison Performed in Period Ending: t~~;~ _~;;~h o~i~_~~~~~R~~~~:nd Hi llS___~~~e cha~_~~_~_~hr~~eri~~aY_S_~~______ ID. ITEM DESCRIPTION ' I=-:-__-:-:_-------.-------:---.-;::~::=-:-::=---=-:-:-- PREVIOUS THIS UNIT UNIT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT ------~-- --------- ~-------- --------~-- -~----~---- - -. ~ ---- .__.-. --.... 37. Extra Depth for Manhole L. F. 0.00 0 () $0.00 $ ~.J '~_:_~~bt~_:~~~h~ i~~--~~~?::~~~ Line ~:~: °ô~ ~~ ~ I ;2 4- !~<?.~~: ~~--- ~7~~-t~)("~ 40. Fire Hydrant Transfer EACH 0.00 I I 321.00 ~¡-/~ là~-b~-'o~-~~~-- 5~a~~~~ ~OCk æ~:-~Z~~:~~-- ~ ~J:·.~-¿-----------1~:~~--- r:2)~~~~ 43. C.O.#l - 24" Butterfly Valve EACH 2.00 0 1.- 6081.00 t2.II..·...Lr~ -144~·. C.O.ll - Bore & Grout L.F. 1.1°1..°0°0 0 IJu .----2871-20-.-..-00-°0-- Z"3:?_.~:~ \oJ C.O.#l - 12" G.V. & Box EACH C t (~;o'~:- 46. c. o. #1 - Inst. 12x8 Tee & Vlv EACH 3.00 (' :? 310.00 9 j(':' - 47.' C.O.ll - Add. Pressure Test L~S. 1.00 0 , 425.00 4~~'~ 1I------------------------------------_________~===_________-_____=~~~_~-~~_______~~:f~~~: Fi~!~ Verification of Job Conditions ._~ep~~ved: S~q/tl1<f·f? .confirmation of Pay Quantities Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc. . . Consulting Engineers ----Cjj Iy· By: · (Own (Project Manager) iI:::~--~-~~---------------~~:-~~-____________________:~:~~~___________________~___~~:==== ~----_...._._.. ---- --- ---- ,-~... ._~- "'- -..----.--- . ...----..---- _I I I Tot a I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5" b '" 7/2 tIó Less Percent (X) Retained . . 5X '2.B 13S-'~ Di ffereñce~-~---:--~----:- .--.------ . . . . 5'36 j7t-4i' Plus (X) Materials on Hand ~~22.¿' ~ 90X' It 'Job f.Ç. 1 51 Jo ~ !-," 'J . ~_. Tota . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ~~ Less Previous Payments . . . . 484166.30 Difference Due This Estimate .. . $ (.,(.., lIt" ~ (Note: _~~~_~~~~_f!~~u~_! Shown) ____--=:_========= --------------------------------~~-~----------~----~------~-----~-------~-------~---~---~---~ 1·..·- ..,_. .. _______H .- ---.- -----.---------.-- etal Earnings (Incl. Retain.>: Time Charged Thru This Period: - ....- --" - -- ... .-- - - . -- ---..--. .-.------.----.......-.. ..'.--_.. _. -.-... ..._...~-_... . -----.--.-- ------- Bid: $529592.61 Percent: Time: 135 Percent: 1_ _ - ------- ---------- f--------- 1 .._~--_._--- _.._- ..---.-.. --- ---.- - --- ----~-. -- --.--------- ...---- --_.- ..--.- ----- ---_.------ - .--- -- -_.-- .---... .---.------------.--- -.--------- --------------.---- I '1 ' '1· I I I I I· I,···· .... lit· .. I I· I ··1 I I I i' I ,Cowell J6. Allisol1 eOl1tractor, Jl1c. 3721 FLo"y SnEET FORT WORTIi, TEXAS 76118 LOWELL B. ALLISON Phone J 89-2221 Metro - - -- --- -- - ..--- Mobile-7n"-n29 December 27, 1986 Knowlton English Flowers, Inc. Attention Richard Albin 550 First State 83nk Building Bedford Texas, 76021 Gentlemen: Please process a change orders 5 throuyh 11 tú our North Richland Hi I Is Miscellaneous Mains Contract for the fa1 lowing ¡tcm~. Chanº-e Or"der No. 5~ ök' ¿~g Reason: Changcs on Lynda Lan~ & Galway Additional Time Requested: 2 Days 1. Add 163 LF of 6 In Water at $7!28=$lJ86.64 2. Add 1 Ea. 4 Ft Bury Firehydrant at $615.25=$615.25 3. Add 1 Ea. 6 In Gate Valve and Bo~ at $281.41=$281.41 4. Add lEa 6 In Tee, .059 Tons Ductile l~ºn_.f_J.t.tl.n-9~ at $2150.70=$126.8 ;> 5. Add Time Spent locafinQ end of existing main, 263 Ft from" Staked Location 6 Hrs. at $90=$540 6. Tota1 Change Order No.5 $2750.10 Change Order---1ID..--6.L OK.. ~f! Reason: City requested tie i~'of 8 In not on plans at timber 1ane drive. AddjtionQl time requested: 1 Day , 1. Add 2- 8 in 0 I Vertic Ie Bends .118 Tons at $2150.70=$253.78 2. Add 8 In PVC Water 10 LF at $8.56=$85.60 ;> 3. Laber Equip. Overhead Etc. Fer Tie In $at $1150= $1150 4. Total Change Order No 6=$1489.38 Change Order No.7: [,K o<~i Reason: Saddles Required.by City For Tapping 0 I Pipe But Not On Prints Additiona1 Time Requested: None 1. 24x2 In Saddles 3 Ea. at $276.88=$830.64 2. 24xl In Saddles 6 Ea. at $202.69=$1216.14 3. 8 In Saddles 2 Ea. at $17.87=$35.74 ;> 4. Total Change Order No7=$2082.52 "'" WATER UNDERGROUND UTILITiES SANITARY.SEWER . STORM DRAIN . CULVERTS . I; I. I I I I I- I· I II .. I I I, I- I, 1 I l' ---- I £owell n.- AllisoN eONtraetor, INC. 3721 FLO~Y STAEET FORT WORTIi, TEXAS 76118 LOWELL B. ALLISON Phone J 89-2221 Metro -- Mobile-7J2-.91n ._~, ..- ..--.-.----.-----.--..--- Mr. Richard Albin Contd. c" f" ~.~e Order N_o. 8..:. () K. .Y¡ Reason: Changes Due To Redesign and Rerouting of 24 In Between Hightower St. and Eden Road. Add-itiona1 Time Requested: 3 Days 1. Add Ductile Iron Fittings 4.421 Tons at $2150.70=$9508.24 a~ 1-24 In Cross at 2575 Lbs. b. 1-24 In Tee at 2130 Lbs. c. 3-24x12 In Reducers ~t 619 Lbs. = 1857 Lbs. d. 2-12x6 Reducers at 145 Lbs. = 290 Lbs. ~.1-12x8 Reducer at 165 Lbs. f. 2-6 In Plugs at 30 Lbs. = 60 Lbs. g. 1-8 In Plug at 55 Lbs. h. 1-24x6 In Tee at 1351 Lbs. Total Weight = 8843 2. Add 3 Ea. 6 In Gate Valve and Box at $281.41=$844.23 3. Add 1 Ea. 8 In Gate Valve and Box at $422.65= $422.65 4. Add 8 In PVC Water 114 LF at $8.56= $975.84 5. Add 6 In PVC Water 46 IF at $7.28=$334.88 »6. Valve Box Extension (6 In Valves Approx. 10 Ft. Deep) 2 Ea. at $65= $130 7. Add Fire Hydrant 1 Ea. at $615.25= $615.25 ~ 8. Add 3 Ft Fire Hydrant Extension 2 Ea at $549.45= $ 1648.35 ~ 9. Add 1 Ft. Extra Depth Of 24 In ~O LF at $1.20= $96 ? 10. Add 2 Ft. Extra Depth Of 24 In 230 LF at $2.40=$552 ? 11. Add 3 Ft. Extra Depth Of 24 In. 360 LF at $3.60= $1296 ~ 12. Add 4 Ft. Extra Depth Of 24 In. 150 LF at $4.80= $720 '/ 13. Add 5 Ft. Extra Depth ·Of 24 In. 80 LF at $6= $480 ? 14. Add 5 Ft. Extra Depth Of 6 In. 40 LF at $4.40~ $176 15. De1ete: 1.787 Tons 0 I Fittings at $2150.70= ($3843.30) a. 2- 24 In 45 Oeg. Bends at 1075 Lbs. = 2150 Lbs. b. 1- ·24 In 90 Deg. Bend at 1425 Lbs. 16. Delete Asphalt Pavement Replacement 590 L F at $8.35= ($4926.50) 17. Delete Saw Cut For Pavement Replacement 590 L F at $.86=($507.40) 18. Total Added = $17799.45 19. Total De1cted = (9277.20) 20. Total Change Order No 8 = $8522.25 .. Change Order No --9: C: ~ Xc:) Reason: Time Spent Trying~o locate 24 In Pipe in lOr Near Hightower St and Subsequent Repair Of Lawns Etc. , Located By City 340 LF +/- West. Additional Time Requested: 2 Days 1. 12 Hours at $90= $J080 Total Change Order No. 9= $1080 WATER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SANITARY SEWE·R . STOR~[ DRAIN . CULVERTS . I, I I- I I I -~."'" I- I· I- II' . . I I I I I· I I I' 1- -. -. £owell J! Allisol1 eOl1traetor, Jl1e. 372J FLOIlY SnEET FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118 LOWELL B. ALLISON Phone J 89-2221 Metro Mobile 732-9129 -- ~ -- -- -~-_... Mr. Richard Albin Contd. . - ,;, K (.,.;? a Change Or"der No'1 0: v v-"'C Reason :Pipe Added In Hightower St. Additional Time Requested: 8 Days 1. Add 24 I~ Water 340 LF at $34.56=$11750.40 .2. Add Extra Cost Of Pipe Not In Original Order 340 LF at $3.52=1196.80 3.Add 2 Feet Of Extra Depth To·Clear Sewer Services 340 L F at $2.40= $816 4. Add Asphalt Pavement Replacement 330 L F at $8.35= $2755.50 5. Add Saw Cut For Removal Of Asphalt 340 LF at $.86= $292.40 NO - 6. Add Cone. Drive Replacement 20 LF at $15.73= $314.60 -- Nt; cf¿(1 7. Add Ducti Ie Iron Fittings 1..055 Tons at $2150.70= $2268.99 ~.. a. 2- 24 In 45 deg. Bends at J055 Lbs. = 2110 Lbs. 8 TotéJ 1 Change Order No· 10 = $193~4. 69 Change Order No. II: C>A!. K9 Reason: Re- Route 12 In Water In Davis Blvd. Additional Time Requested: 2 Days 1. Move out and move in, lLump Sum, $430 2.Add .375 Tons Ductile Iron Fittings at $2150.70= $806.51 a. 2- 12 In 45 Dcg Bends at 198 Lbs. = 396 Lbs. b. 2- 12 In 22.5 Deg. Bends at 171 Lbs. = 354 Lbs. 3. Add conc. encasement required, 40 L F at $14.98=$599.20 4. Clear and remove underbrush and briars, 4 hours at $60=$240 NO - 5. Add 8 In San Sew trench span· at $123.05=$123.05 -Nt) dKa 6. Total Change Order No. 11=$2198.76 ~ Total Change Orders 5 Through 11= $37517.70 Total Additional Days ~ 18 ~. Your cooperation is appreciated. Yours Very Truly; Lowell 8. Allison WATER U^'DERGROU^'D UTILITIES SANITARY SEWE.-R . STORM DRAIN . CULVERTS . I ¡ I ¡ I ! I I I I I , I I, '! I ' ~ g ~ ~ R ~ ct g ~ ~ m ~ ~ 2: ~ ¢ g ~ ~ 8 ~ g ~ g ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ g ~ g g g g g g g g g g ~ g g g g g ~ II ~ Ii ~ g ... ~···········'·····························'..I .1.. N If') M ....c N V) " C~ M ..0 0 ... M m 0'" " 0 ~ ~ NO... CD ~ ,.. 0 N 0 I{') 0 q- 0 0 0 if) 0'- 0 0 ('II ... 0 CD N 0 0 0 if) M I ..0 II ~ ~('" ~ q' q-.,.. If') CD N m ..0 ... r..; 0 0- 0 CD q-o'..o N M M N I(') ..0 &11 N 0 If) 0- ! 0'- 0- I· Uì ~ I 0 10 N ~ N ..0 N " ... (''i M IN... ~ .-4 c:t' q- M 0- M q-. " .... M ... MOO ~ q-o 111 If) M 0- Q) ~ 0- ,.. N. Ii') ~ I CO .~ I q 9"1 ,0 t1 ~ ct' .... M CD "1 ~..o I ..a I N q " "'1..0 II tn ..0 ~ " N l V,....c M M (D N ..0 c::t N..o....c I· M ,.. ...., 0 I If') C'i. M , N I ~ I N ~ ~ N 1111 ¡... 111 M N I' 'I' - --- ¡- i - /'" ~ N ¡ - I: ~ ¡, ~ ! --I -- I " I ! I i ~ I I: I: ët ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !; ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ 2 8 f:1 8 ~ 8 g 8 ~ g 8 g g g g ~ g g 8 8 8 ~ :: ~ f.. .. · · · · · · Ii . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II. Ii ~ ~ ..oMn..o~"'MOnnO"'Nm"~Oc::t""CDNo-MM..oMONOIOOOO&f)O'-OOO""..omNOOO ()MIN II~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g ~ fri ~ ~ ßì g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cg Li ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ : ~ ~ : ~ N ~ ;;; ~ :2 P{ ~ ~ ~ ~ l' ~ :. 8 8 ..0. 111 If) ',..."" ('~ ~ q-..o... N ,..... Q) N 10 &11 N I'" I N I ... ... ' .... ,0 ('.~ M N 1..0 I . ~ N I c::t ¡ II I ¢ ' M N i I· -- + i ¡ II CD .... N .... r ~ :: ~ fu :.' I I Iii ,I I' ~ ~ I f '! I I 3 U) ~On~Oq-oNOn..oOOOON~OOmnnOnCDN..o&f)O"O..oOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ~_I ~~ m~"""c:t'''ooo-O..o~OO~Oc::tq-OOCDN''mN..omOO9''10~oQ)OOOOOOONOOOOOOOOO ~~ ~~ Moomñm~MÑÑmöödöÑ~öö~~~mm~~M~Ó~ÖÖOÒÒÒÖÓÔ~O~ÒÓÖÒOOO M~¡ 05 ~~~Ñ~~~~~?J g egg ~~;~~~~~~!~:: : !~7!~ ~ 0:.: I § ~!~ I 11 17, I I I 1 1 -17 I i 1 I ,~ ¢ ! 7 ~ ¡ I I'CD If) ~ .-4 ~ M q, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..0 0 0 0 0 " 0 " N an &n 0 0 NON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 If') 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I M I' " CD .... w I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ "- ~ ~ <1 ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0: ~ ~ ~ ~ ct; "- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ": ~ :; I I() zJ-Iq-N~mMIf1I()OOOOOIOOI(').-400oN..oom"Olnlf')o"O"'OOoooo"oo~ooOOOOO¡:MI1JI ct' I l1J W I 0 0 0' M " 9"4 ~ .' N If]. 0 0 lOr--. ¢ 0 0 OJ. .... -a .N , ,..... "'. ,.... N '0 0 i 0 0 .... ~ 0 0 c, O. 0 0 0 0 0 , 0' '0 , C ~ ~ 11- " I - ~ - - - - -1" ·-1- N , ·1 ì - i 1- -! 1- -1- "1- -I: ; I: "I I I I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I; or; I: .. .. , · 1:, ~ I I ~~~C:~~~~~C:~~C:~~~~~C:~~~~~C:~~C:C:C:C:C:C:9C:C:C:~C:9C:C:~C:C:999: U 1¡.5ñ.' fU I 0 - I ~. " an ..0'1. '. 0- q- 0-.. N ... ..0 0 0 ~ 0 ...... '. ~ 0 0 w:1 .... lOCO 10 ..0 " " MOM 0 MOO 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 I' . I: r1J E e I 1..0 M í1 " .... M I I' I I I; ~ ... CD 10 INN i I 9"4 ..0. I .... I~ e a ~ i ¡I ~ ~ ¡ ~I IIII c¡ ... ~II ' - ' '. ~ 1 V'JII, ' 'I '. _ II I - II II! ~ ¡! ~ ~ ~! 1\ III! ~ I! Æ 8!. s. en II.... > I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0·0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 I: U I, 2 !Z II;::!!:; I<=:<=: <=: <=: <=: <=: 9 <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: o¡ <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: 9 <=: "? <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: ~ <=: <=: <=: ~ <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: <=: II ëë II II~I Ii ¡j ¡ ~~gï~~Šo~1--1-M1~~1~OJ1~~i~-1~0~00ìN-100J1~~1:-1-- Ii i Ii , u ~ J >- J 00 ~ 0 0 J 0 od 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 oq 0 n q 0 0 q 0 0 J 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N J 0 0 J 0 0' ¡i Q 'I 0 0 . ~ u .... ...".......... 0 ~ · · · · · , · · . . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Z I¡ 0 0 I· · ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-·~l ~ ~ &1lOJ N n...N).....:. ........ J¢... .;....In.. ª ~ 1..m M'~I ~ r: ~. ~ ¢Jo ~ 0 ~ Ò Ò OJ. Ñ': 41 ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~.: 1'':': I¡ ~!i ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ¡ _' ' '.,', I I - N i ' ¡; E ¡! cz: I ~ 0 n ~ 0 -0 aJ 0 In CD CD 0- N 0 ..0 m IÌ1 n 0 If) M ..0 m If) 0- 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0":: ~:I.. CIJ ~ t-; w ~ ~ ~ '; r; "? ~ ~ "! "'; "? ~ ~ -: "'; '1 <=: ~ II! ~ ~ "'! r; to: II! 0; <=: <=: II! ~ II! <=: ~ <=: "! ~ <=: ~ "! <=: ~ <=: <=: ~ <=: ~ <=: "! I ~ II ~ ':ä w .... u qo ~ CD 1 n CD l- N ... 0 - ° OJ N 0 ¢ n ~ If] M ~ OJ n ° ¢ M 0 N 0 ¢ 0 0 0 " 0- 0 0 N ... ~ OJ - N 0 0 If] M I.' a II.... Q U) J ~ ëë ~..-4 N... m ~ m12 f!) g ~ ê8 ~ Ñ :: ~ :Q ~ q-l ..-4 I'..... ~ I ,i I, ~ ~ I· g ~ C~ ..... ~ Ñ ~ 1... ~ ~ II c:I'" 0 : ffi II 'Q. I .,' , OJ -- ¢ ï ... 1 1 '- - I 2 Ii' ~!: ~!/ ~ ~ I ... ~ n = IJ! ~ ~ II! ~ ~ II! 5 5 5 5 5 is is is z ~ ~ is is is is ~ ~ ~ ~ is ¡J ~ ~ II! ~ ~ II! is is ~rñ ~ is ~ >= is ~ 5 is rñ ui II! ~ I! u ~ 0:: 3 II Z J...... <I ([ ([ c:r <t ([ ~ ([ 0 · · <t <t ([ <t · · · . <I , . . . . . . <t c:r . . . <t . . <t . <t <t . . LaJ en II II , ! ~ ~ II :J I· ..J ..J ..J .J .J ..11 L&J UJ LLf L&J L&J ~ L&J ~ .J -' L&J UJ I¿J """I ..J ..J ~ ..J LIJ ~ ~ ..J .J¡..J ..J .J LtJ LLJ -J,.J ..J W ..J U ~ ..J UJ UJ ..J.J : ~ ~ UJ Ii -= II:: C n :Ie " II ~ OJ OJ ~ ~ ~ I . ~ Q. OJ I , ~ II ~ I' Q ã I: ~ Q Lù II I 0 > > c: c: :2 c: GJ co .... -.4 c: .... > :> ., II 0 I' '" ~ ~ c: II ~ -; -; ~ ~ -; ü: III ~ ~ ~ ¡! L Q; Q. -; . Ñ ..J -;; I = Ii ... ffi .' Q ..: I ~ :J ~ II II IU I"" :> :> .... .... ~ III ~ .... ·Pf CIJ U! 0 J L ð" .. 0 ~ I III m :> ~ ... I, en to III. s. ~o ... LIJ ... II Q. ~ ~ ~ ~ II II otS II aU ~ ~ u ., ~ ~ ~ ~ 'to ~ ~ 1 cP i ~I ~ .!: g ~ >. ~ =... I; ~ g¡ II ~ u U) U .... II Z ~ CL. .... :1 ... a.. a.. > > III .... ~ QI OJ OJ ... Q. c: OJ OJ ~ ..! .. ..' 0 III 0 0 '" rø c ~ .... m ~ L I' 1-4 II S. U) .... II 0 i Q. 0.: 0.. -.4 .... OJ OJ OJ CIJ III m GJ GJ > If) tn Q. OJ fU U) U') III 0 ..0 CD 1 .... C .J::. X 3 CIJ ~ ....;:, -!;:, I; Z J- II 0 . ... 1-4 <t U 1-4 L L 1 CL ~ >)C )( IU QJ > > C QJ IU .... i IU 0: .... Q. , . OJ ! 0 IU C 0 't- U L 0 ~ CD U'I '" z.~ 'tJ U 1: II .... QI OJ L ~ L I .-4 0 0 0 .-4 .-4 C1I Q :1 ~ o6J rø Lea:: leU') c: C o6J .. .. .. ...r:. Q ro .... U &n 0 cu S. x U1 U') I' <t::J L oX Q ~ i ¡Q:: ~ ':ä ':ä ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ III ~ III UHf! .!: .!: oW ~ ~::: ~ ~ .... ~ ~ or; III ~ ~ ã 6 5 ã ~ Ü 1: ([ ~:ä II:: t I!I :> ~ ~ ~ I, LIJ ~ I; Õ ti 0.. . II CC 3 3 I1J r1J rø ~.6J ~ ~ ~ CD CD UJ UJ :'1 ~ c::t ~ I1J rø C:I OJ U Uf -0.... .... .... .... ~ s. C. 't:J ~ ~ . ! 0....- a! a: ct .'i,: 3 U) f 6~' ~ . .3:;S;3~~~ III III III'S,S OJD>U¡MN~ ",3:;S; ~ ~-; ~ :¡¡ññ--:ô':ä-:ô':ä. ~~ ~~t¡'":~p; IIII!I.J .~ :~... r.... z :;: ~ ~ '": '": ...: ..: ~ u u ~ ~ ~ ~ :t :t.S .S 6 ê ê c ~ .!: .!: ~ -r ð g r:. rr M ê ~ ~ ~ ~ '!- ~ .c:; . ~ Q ~ :r õ N ~::g _ 1 ~ ~ I: ~ ~ 8 .~ ,g 1: Q Q &:i cl Q. 5: 5: Ñ ~ ~ ~ I!- ~ :t:t ~ ~ ~ Q; ~ .g ~ æ. Q ffi LIJ L fS fS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II II) ~ 5 ti ~ ~ 3 N III - M ~:: :- r= r= ¡: ~ ~ I' ~~.. ~..¡..¡. J"¡. ~-rIll';III' .;l!-l!-alLL ~~8iñ....~II::~~:-LLlJWLIJL1 g;t~O:II)~.' I I 1 I: 1 th 155 :'¡¡ . Cl:OJL 1-4 QQ~~Q~~~~~~~~: a ::OQ~:X:~~-;;~~~~3?~O£"5-5-5""~", .,äxû;;;;;;. J uu ::5~ :;; Q 2 ... Q 9. Qq. I!I ~ I!I .x :~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ 8 ~ Õ Õ ~ ~ ~ ~ ë ~ Q. ~ :¡¡ :¡¡ :¡¡ :¡¡ -è -¡; b :;: ë ~. å ci ci ci ci ci ci , <l <l I; 7 'r z ~ U qo N. .' N I · ~ = I' I qo N: : ~ a 0 :. .... .J::..J:. U\. 0 ", 0 ". 0: 0 1. S. 1. 1. ~ ft1 x ....: .... CD . . . . . . . .. 1-.- I 0 0 8 ~ ~ ~-OJ"'-OJ~NOJ"'NN1OJ~9OJP; ~ILII)~~U~UII)1OJP; ,I-¡"''''I-¡II)II)~1:NU¡_uuuuuuu I~~ liNN I ..... ~ " · · · · · " · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · I I . .. a c ~NM~IO-o~ mo-O..-4NMq-IO..o"CDO-O"'NMc::tn~"mO-OMNM~ ()-D"CDo-O""NMc::tIf)..o."CD ' : . :,8 I~ i J ¡ J~"'''''''l--ï-~-lNJNNNNïNN~~~lMM1MM1MM1¢¢ì¢¢i¢¢ Ii I: · "L..-:._ Iò' .. I.;,;. to I:t "L¡, :: :: ::: :: :: :: :: =" L",j ;::: = ~;;~ _ _ 1:._) _ _ l =-::-J ~0 0 GOO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II' ......, \......,.....-, U ..,1 It Hit (~ OV:JU ·~-3 I 1- ; I I- ..0-011 Q)Q)tI 0' 0- II ... ..... II I I II U U II W W AI CO I a "" ~ ¡ N In ; ? ~-ë M C ,UJ Ö .'t:J z .. 0 QI.... ,c"'LI o ." Q,t II t-)QD..I/ II 1/ II II II " II II II II II II -II II II I I II I ..0 I I I /~ I j LX I-t- ZZ Q::J UO 1: .<t ... o ~ .- cnw OJ- uct Q -.J <to J-J- o r¡ --..- -- - _. --..---...-... - - -- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development ~epartment: Subject: Request of SAM Joint Venture, eta!, for Release of Ten Foot Utility Easement 1n ~den Add1t10n Resolution 87-6 1/12/87 Council Meeting Date: PW 87-5 Agenda Number: In September 1983, Oak Hills Joint Venture secured a ten foot Utility Easement from May Jean Hamilton for the off-site extension of a sewer main north of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad to serve the Oak Hills Subdivision south of the Railroad. The alignment of the Utility Easement was designated around a proposed Subdivision street pattern. Prior to the beginning of construction on the Oak Hills Subdivision a revised Subdivision plat was submitted for the property north of the Railroad. This new plat was the Eden Addition. In the design of the Eden Addition plat the sewer main routing was revised to match the approved plat. Since the easement was not utilized and was replaced by another routing in the approved plat the City took no formal action, outside of the plat approval, to void the earlier easement. In researching the deed records of the lots in the Eden Addition, a title company has taken exception to the existence of the filed easement since it falls under a residence they are attempting to close. They have requested that the City Council officially release the easement in question. The applicants are requesting that the release be granted for the entire length of the easement so that all titles in the affected Subdivision can be cleared. rThe easement which replaced the one to be released is of equal or greater value and was officially dedicated to the City in the Eden Addition plat. RECOMMENDATION: II It is recommended that the City adopt Resolution No. 87-6 releasing the ten foot -r utility easement as filed in Vol 7647, Page 1923 Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable R fL/~ City Manager . Fmance Director I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I Hannon Engineering, Inc. December 30, 1986 Mr. Roger Line City Manager City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re: Request £or Abandonment o£ Easement, Eden Addition Dear Mr. Line: This letter is a request on behal£ of SAM Joint Venture, the developer of Eden Addition. for the abandonment of a utility easement which meanders across Eden Addition and which is recorded in Volume 7647, Page 1923 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. This easement has been replaced by another easement which was granted on the plat of Eden Addi- tion. A copy of the subJect easement and a sketch showing the alignment o£ the easement and it1s replacement are attached. The history on this easement is that John Bar£ield obtained an o££site sewer easement for Oak Hills Addition in 1983. The sewer was not installed at that time due to delays in constructing Oak Hills Addition. In 1984, Eden Addition was platted and the sewer constructed in a different location to match the street and lot layout of Eden Addition. A replacement easement was granted and the property was platted without regard to the location of the original easement. In the belie£ that the city1s acceptance of the plat voided the old easement, no formal abandonment was requested. We now have a con£lict with an existing structure, a title company which has taken exception to the conflict and a mort- gage company that refuses to £und the purchase until the easement is abandoned. In all probability, this can be expected to occur again on other lots. We hope that it can be resolved £or the whole addition at this time. 1245 Southridge Court Suite 204 Hurst. Texas 76053 817 282-8186 (Metro) 817 268-6600 I Ie I Mr. Roger Line December 30. 1986-pg.2 We would appreciate it i£ you would place this request on the City Council agenda £or the January 12 meeting. Thank you. I Sincerely. I HANNON ENGINEERING. INC. I Mark B. P.E. " I enclosures: A. Easement B. Sketch I copies: Garrett Sherman Troy Ashcra:£t Gene Merrell I ae I I I I I I Ie I I I Ie ,í . I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I 1-- ~ JfJ~: þ ~Irl[s EASDÐrT -.n IF TMMIr · ... AU. .. IT ytaE PUSœS: 1'-t I,., /l/1:Ic ~~ ~~s SeneI', for I~ constdarlttl ., · ..,..., purcJllse ce ~ Do II.rs (S q. ... ... 111 of the te.-s... - _::-:- fons ~reo- -. grin, seU Ind conve to t Ctty of IDraa Ifdl1ud Ht11s, . ....tet...1 corporatton of Tarrlnt County, TexIs, IS Buyer. I perpetuAl ~ for tile purpose of COftstn.cttng, ustng Ind ..tnufntng pub1 ic service uti 1 ttfes. .1. perpeta1 ..se.ent being s.... and descrtbed Oft the ptat attlched hereto, which plat is ..... · part. hereof. ud/or fwther described as f011ows: . (SEE AnAQI£D PUT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION) . III I41dftfon to the lbove descrfbed perpetua1 easement. SeneI' Iho hereby grants to Cft;)' · teIIIporlry rfght of ICCI!SS to. Ind use of, 11ne1s of SeHer fmedtate1y Idjacent to tbI perpetual elSlllent IS necesslry for construction of proposed. fac11 ities by nonnal operatfons; ft befng specfffca11y Igreed that tn the exercfse of thts prfvf1edge the Ctty ~11 not c....te Iny contfnufng nufslnces or sftuatfons detrimenta1 to the premises Ind upon ca.p1etton of the MOrk. witl Promptly vacate said premises and restore them to a condition substantia11y equ~1 to, or better thin. that which existed when said MÞrk was cormenced. . . The Igreed purchase price inc1udes full accord. satisfaction and compensation for 111 ca.ands of tbe Se11er~subJect al~o~~ fO~l 1n9 specia1,conditions..~:~ s,i¿~ r~~~'.s ~f' /"~,¡ r.".. /Jo",,- tø(, '-'''ton- ( z:...ø 1.0 "''''ç 771~ -n..o de,J Ik- L -f¡. 1Ñ ~ .,¡¡J{ ~i, fl.,;. -ll/ìs ¡4ojt: c.u, Nr ~ f'. - if1h.. Drt~ - c::4I~l"7. 0( ~ · To hive Ind hold the s_ perpetuallY to the City of North Richllnd.Hil1s and its ,r~v successors Ind Issigns forever. . . - Executed .J 'l.~ Rt ch 1 ~ .!!Q 1s, Tarrant Co¡Inty. TexIs, t n tri p 11 ca ~e ort gi nil on ~I the ~ day of ~~ A.D., 19~.. . ; . >;~~~~ ~lrn~:'L SELLERS . ~ ~l~~ ,on this day personally appeared · nown to .e to be the person whose name is subscribed ng n tru.ent ac now1edged to me that he executed the same for the purposes ~ - .. . - . retfQII -~~1,f\ expressed. GIVEN. UNDER MY HAND ~D SEAL or ,OFFICE this ~. .~._::,'_ ~..~ L~tf;.-L~. - A.D.. I9~. . _ ..IJ., ~~' I~ ~ : ~ · (..Á. " L.l..u - . ~ rtar.n- P LIt - n In . 1,,- "" _ __ Counu , Texas STATE OF TEXAS CCUITY OF . BEFORE fIE . on tht s day personally appeare"d · known to me to be the person whose name is $ubscr1be~ to the foregoIng Instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the pUrposes and considerltion therein expressed. GIVEN U::DER MY HA~¡O AND SEAL Of OfFICE this ct.y of A.D.. 19 A NOTARY PU8LI~ 1n and for County. Texas 1 of 3 Please r~tur~ to: \land. Cal vert City of ~orth R1chland H1l1. p.n. lox 1!609 S'. ""~ph TV ,,,,,a : -- ~ w ,.. ~ ~ ~ r- .~ CD I" ;. I Ie I I I I I I I ae I I I I I I Ie I 1-- _ '1 " . ,: .'" -, . , ~ -~:"~.~~'..-~~'~:. t.~"~~; - '. .. ~ . . r \ \ .';. \':~~ ~ -\ ~' ., ~~ ~~ ,~ t~ etaAeAh- ~ ~ .t,- tJ7WE ¿'P, // ;.. ~,o,c.{OIIØ s-., _____~ /' ' ,~_ ~ IIWIIo '\ ~... ~ c.a...r.rr;-,.,.s ....-.._--~ < .. \~. rf- ~ "-olhez; /' ~ .~~~ ~ ;;'>/"",,'~ \ ~ ~ // ,\-\\ ~. *~ y V~ .'fo~'. rJh. ~ \ T-~ ~ .~.~\\ ,lV /" '\ 't.\ \~...~ ~// / \ ~ \ 0 ~í\~ ~. // \~ \ -~~~ :1. " I '., ~ \ \ ~~ ~ 14/:, \~ ~~~ -t II \~, \ /" :.~ IJ ( \, 'v /-. iii I IJ ) // t) Ittj I '/" ~ R~ ~/ ~f;(' /" J T1 _~·.f L--~/ ~ - ';J~ l~ 1',of> ~ -II~ I~ \ ¡'~ I ../ / < '\ I..pr ( ) fO¢!/ /: ~ ~~...o ~" $- é~' ,Þ'''''O ~ 4-'" "i:Þ~ k, Ú-r ~ ~J.,J ::Jr:' _ """.¡Jrfr f ,11' . . -f',0..1 f/1-."~ 4'~~;'·" ..> ~ þ.09' .. /' µ'~" "' ., DAVID C. MOAK $uIwøM., ¡lie. ...- ..-...c ItIIVIYOa N." ... I..·IIU .-sf. 1DAI ..11 7- - '''-7%.% Q .,...,.tat .---~ -.- - -.---.-.. I ~ Ie I I .tICI.., II'S I I .... t'" Cft"Þ" ""-I ." ...-c-el .., .... .tt_ted 1ft te. ....... "'.. ~...,.,. A-I aM. 1aIrT.. c...tw. T...... ... "'. t'" c.-tHII.. of. "''''I'O~ 10.0 f~t uttltt, ~ ... k'" '.,.tlwl' 4....rJ..... ~ Nt" .... ...... .. roll.......: I Øllfll3lCœ: at tlw ~thwNt ~"""'r Ctf _ ".7S .-rr tr~t nC lAnd dt"M'rltwd 'n ct... I'ROI'4" I. '·Ctl.... 6.". Pap 601. ~ .«...rel.. TarrMtt c:,.UIU~.. Tcc.~. ..lei ~tnt "I.. t" Ioutbea., ~omer "r . trKt nVII.... ~ "3,· Ceo. ....U t..... and ~."C In tlK" ....thftlF rl&ht-t'f__, of ,t.. ~t. Laul..... ~t....tern RaUrNd: I 11I!2ICE South SS d~r.... 21 .Inut.. 00 aerf'ftdll '.'t!lIt with _Id l~rthf'rly rlpt-ar-..~. '9S.97 fert to - potnt for th..· POrt:T or Ia:'~n~~r. of the II£REIN DrSCft 11m CEUTtr:r. n:E. Mid pol.t b.ln,. In the :Jnrtherly .xtrn.lon oC t"r c...,n lnt lInt' ht'tW'con LotA 2'- and 27 of Bock 7 of o.k 11111 AddItion tn the Cft~ oC North Riehland I!lll,,; TRr.-X:E Nctrth ]4 ctC'Rr~" 32 .lnuteR 00 SflCond" ,",~~t vit;, Mid prnru"cd c,-ntt"rllne. 70.00 f.et to a point; I TPÐCE Nort h 19 df'J;t'ee. 28 .fnut." no RKOnd II Ea ret, 198.73 C ect tn a po Int: !RENCe North 0 dPgr~" 58 afnute~ 00 .~OndR taAt. 300.44 feet to 3 point at th. beafnnlng of a curve to the right whose radiuII point ~~~rs S(Nth 89 dcr.re.. 02 .lmlt~1I 00 .econd. Ea.t at 297. SO feet; THDlC£ Northerly with said C'urve. an arc distant". of 311.01 fe~t t(, a rofnt 1n a curv,,' who.e radius point bears ~th &4 degrees 43 minutcs 00 seconds PeRt at 247.40 fe~t; ~E Northwesterly with soid curve, an Arc di~tance oC 181.3S Ccet Lo . point; -- TllDl:E '!orth 53 d~rees 07 mfnutes 21t SecOndA Ea!llt. 202.23 feet tn II point 1n the Eaaterly boundary line of said Mae C.enc lI.aUton. property. .aid point heing North 23 dearee. 57 .inute. 23 .econds Vest. ~8J.73 fe~t fr~ the plRC'e of beginning. I I I I I I ~v . ... :JO-I] Ie I DAVID C. MOAK s...a... !lie _HI'" ;;¡¡:;& e.wÞM ... - ... ....1111 .-t1'. ~ - ðf·7Z.~ ~ .,.., ....-- 1-- I ~ Ie I I D r S C RIP T 1 0 ~ I I I I ALL that certain tract or part"eot of land Rltuattd In 11t(' nilvtd ~Io"e" ~ur\'e~'. ,\-1150. Tarrant County. Tœa". and betn~ th(' C'ent«t Ine of a rropoMt"d 10.0 fctC't utillt~ _caent and being Curth('r deacr fh('C! b)· .t·tea nnd bounds a~ follow,,: I cm'U~X:I!f(: at the 5outh"...øt cnrn('r of a 1?7S acre tr:lct deS4:rl"ed In rl~ed r,ocorded fa Volu_ 6149. P.~e b03. nead '~ordK. "Tarrant r.(\unt~'. Texas. I;~td rolnt h"in~ In the Northerly rl¡ht-of-way of th..· !'t. Laruls and SC.'utth~Rtern Rail r""d: -- Tl'nl:F. North 23 deogreell 57 mtnut ''OK 23 Sf'C'ond ~ ~'(,Sl wi t h !I'a id t'c,;t N1undary Ilnr. 683.73 Ceet to a point (or the !»nl~T OF nr.(a~:r:n:r; of the Hm':IN 1)r.~r:IBrn Cr.Y['~LI~r.: TMF.NCE ~!nrt h 53 deogre.R' 07 lIIinut ('11; 26 øecnnd 11; FARt. 138. S9 fet>t to" po fnt tn an existing 10.0 font utility easement. I I I I I I DAVID C. MOAK ~~- _ J ..... ........ ...- ... I"-U" ~. ,... 7-1....' "M-7%% Ie I .. .. ...,.... , ..- ". ..,.. ....:t. ;. . ~ 1-- I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I 1 Ie ...... . ~.. I 1-- ... M .... ... -u. ---- - .... ..-- ....... ..... ,. 4ID ....., -.- lea -- -u ....-lk r~r ~ o¡. fIXAs .-'* .~ . ...-...-.: - ... ......... : ___. _.......-..... __ ...... _ - IIU:D . WI · -...... ï;;"" ,... " ~ - ... - .. e- ocr ·I;-----:~'î·:~' ~ J/tp~A· ",..-::j.-. u..' it - CIDIrIrrr cu. ~ .... ~...... .-'~ . -.... :. . -.¡a :-- C~ Co,.) ~ c::::a ~ C":t .... -, ~ ~ r- ,. ~. ¡n N :-:0 -. r- - :a. "'. ~_ .,.., WJ1!IZ' ~ ~ \'.\' ~ I ~-'~ .~!, Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I L ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ <'2 Cà· ~ ~ '/0 > '< \S' ~9 921 ~ r,:-'~C'-.:n?i~~ ,ON ~îl ~ ~ . , I - I tt 0 (", ~ " ~ \~ , '~ " "\ \1 tQ '-tì \--4J .- " ;: ~ I) ~ I', ~ ~~~ { ~ ~ " 0 ,J' X ',tj Q " () I '" ~~ :) l \ I "-1.1 ~ \ ~ , \) r:} Q ,~ <J \ ~ ~ ~ 0\ " I lU I ~ 4J co : , -- , I ~ 10 ¡- -~ I -: (þ , I \ - - t I , tn 'I , 1 .. O'fOH N303 " I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I RESOLUTION NO. 87-6 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS A RESOLUTION ABANDONING A TEN FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ON SOUTHEASTERN SIDE OF ST. LOUIS AND SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD TRACKS, NORTH THROUGH EDEN ADDITION. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas finds that it presently owns a ten foot utility easement, previously dedicated for general utility use purposes, on property described below; and WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the City of North Richland Hills no longer needs, uses or anticipates a need or use for such easement. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills that: I. The City of North Richland Hills sh~ll, and does hereby, abandon all right, title or interest in and to that certain ten foot easement running north from the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad Tracks through Eden Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, such easement having been previously granted and dedicated to the City of North Richland Hills in Vol. 7647, page 1923 Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. II. By passage and adoption of this resolution it is the intent of the City of North Richland Hills to relinquish any and all claims to such easement or to any future use of such easement. This Resolution shall be filed with the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, as evidence of the abandoment of such easement by this City. day of , 1987 PASSED AND RESOLVED this APPROVED: Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Attorney for the City