HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1987-01-26 Agendas
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
JANUARY 26, 1987 - 6:00 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 Northeast loop 820~
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1. GN 87-10 Ratification of Hiring of
Pannell, Kerr & Forster for
Negotiating with the City of
Fort Worth for a Wastewater
Contract, Rates and Sewer Access
Fee (Agenda Item #12) (Suggested
Discussion Time - 25 Minutes)
2. PW 87-9 Request of B. H. & L. Joint
Venture for Approval of
Temporary Construction on Wilson
Lane (Agenda Item #23)
(Suggested Discussion Time - 15
Minutes)
3. PU 87-10 Fire Station No.4 Bid Proposal
and Recommendation; Phillip
Swager Associates (Agenda Item
#18) (Suggested Discussion Time
- 10 Minutes)
4. PU 87-6 Consideration of Authorizing
Condemnation of Property Owned
by Mr. S.R. Seale, Goode, Inc.
(Hank Sutton), and Mr. W.H.
Long, Resolution No. 87-5
(Agenda Item #14) (Suggested
Discussion Time - 5 Minutes)
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
5. SO 87-3 Proposed Sign Ordinance
Revisions, Ordinance No. 1436
(Agenda Item #9) (Suggested
Discussion Time - 10 Minutes)
6. PW 87-7 New Water and Sewer Projects
Throughout the City (Agenda Item
#21) (Suggested Discussion Time
- 10 Minutes)
7. PW 87-11 Sidewalks Along Smithfield Road
Near Smithfield Elementary
School (Agenda Item #25)
(Suggested Discussion Time - 5
Minutes)
8. Other Items
9. *Executive Session
a. Discuss Pending Litigation
(Suggested Discussion Time -
10 Minutes)
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the
Open Meetings Law. If any action is
contemplated, it will be taken in open session.
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
l1ANUARY 26, 1987
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda
for discussion and/or action.
NUMBER
1.
ITEM
Call to Order
ACTION TAKEN
2. Roll Call
3. Invocati on
4. Minutes of the Special Meeting December 31,
1986
5. Minutes of the Regular Meeting January 12,
1987
6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda
7. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk
(9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24 & 25)
8. PZ 86-75 Request of Charles Schreiner
Nelson for Appeal Hearing
* 9. SO 87-3 Proposed Sign Ordinance
Revisions, Ordinance No. 1436
10. GN 87-8 Calling City Council Election,
Resolution No. 87-7
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*11. GN 87-9 Contract Between Trinity River
Authority and City of North
Richland Hills for Laboratory
Service
*12. GN 87-10 Ratification of Hiring of
Pannell, Kerr & Forster for
Negotiating with the City of Fort
Worth for a Wastewater Contract,
Rates and Sewer Access Fee
13. GN 87-11 Public Hearing - Charter
Commission Recommendations
*14. PU 87-6 Consideration of Authorizing
Condemnation of Property Owned by
Mr. B.R. Seale, Goode, Inc. (Hank
Sutton), and Mr. W.H. Long,
Resolution No. 87-5
*15. PU 87-7 Bid Award for Tractor with Backhoe
*16. PU 87-8 Bid Award to Jack Williams
Chevrolet for Four Diesel Dump
Trucks
*17. PU 87-9 Bid Award for Water Bill Mailer
to Intec Business Systems
*18. PU 87-10 Fire Station No. 4 Bid Proposal
and Recommendation; Phillip
Swager Associates
I- Page 3
I
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
I
I *19. PU 87-11 Bid Award to Casco Industries
Inc., for (20) Bunker Fire Coats
and Pants
I
*20. PW 87-6 Community Development Block Grant
I Program - Harmonson Road between
Dawn Drive and Honey Lane
I *21. PW 87-7 New Water and Sewer Projects
I Throughout the City
*22. PW 87-8 Authorization for Participation
I in the Construction of Holiday
Lane Between Hightower and
I Starnes Road
I *23. PW 87-9 Request of B. H. & L. Joint
Venture for Approval of Temporary
I Construction on Wilson Lane
*24. PW 87-10 City of North Richland H1lls'
I Participation in Big Bear Creek
Extension Project - Resolution
I No. 87-8
I *25. PW 87-11 Sidewalks Along Smithfield Road
Near Smithfield Elementary School
I 26. Citizen Presentation
I 27. Adjournment
I
I
l-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
~ ~
MINUTES AND CERTIFICATION
DECEMBER 31, 1986
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF TARRANT §
On the 31st day of December, 1986, the City Council of
the City of North Richland Hills convened in emergency meeting at
the emergency regular meeting place thereof in the City Hall, the
meeting being open to the public, an emergency notice of such
emergency meeting having been posted as prescribed by Article
6252-17, V.A.T.C.S., and the roll of the dUly constituted offi-
cers and members of the City Council was called, which members
are as follows, to-wit:
Mayor Pro Tem Richard Davis
Councilman Mack Garvin
Councilman Harold Newman
Councilman Dick Fisher
and all of such persons were present, except the fOllowing absen-
tees:
Councilwoman Marie Hinkle Councilman Jim Ramsey
Councilwoman Virginia Moody
thus constituting a quorum. Whereupon the following was trans-
acted, to-wit: a written Resolution bearing the following caption
was introduced:
A Resolution authorizing and consenting to the
sale of the Project from M & H Realty Company to
H & M Food Systems Company and releasing M & H
Realty Company, in connection with the $2,500,000
North Richland Hills Industrial Development
Commission Industrial ~evelopment Bonds (M & H
Company ProjectlJ) Series 1985.
The Resolution, a full, true and correct copy of which
is attached hereto, was read and reviewed by the City Council.
Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Resolution was
finally passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Mayor Pro Tern Richard Davis. Councilmen Mack Garvin. Harold Newman
~ and Dick Fisher NOES: None
The Presiding Officer then declared the Resolution
passed and signed and approved the same in the presence of the
City Council.
I~
c/'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tt
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
,.
MINUTES APPROVED AND CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT
and to refleçt accurately the duly constituted officers and
members of the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills,
and the attached and following copy ~f such Resolution is hereby
certified to be a true and correct copy of an official copy
thereof on file among the official records of the City, all on
this 31st day of December, 1986.
CcJ~
Mayor,
Texas
of North R~chland H~l s,
ATTEST:
I .
[SEAL]
~f-
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - JANUARY 12, 1987 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Echols called the meeting to order January 12, 1987, at 7:30 p.m.
Present:
Dan Echols
Richard Davis
Marie Hinkle
Mack Garvin
Virginia Moody
Harold Newman
Jim Ramsey
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Rewis
Rex McEntire
Lee Maness
Gene Riddle
Richard Royston
Ben Shanklin
Don Dietrich
George Tucker
Members of the Press
Absent:
Dick Fisher
John Whitney
Richard Albin
2.
ROLL CALL
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilman
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
Finance Director
Public Works Director
Director of Planning
City Engineer
Assistant Public Works Director
Member Planning & Zoning/Charter Commission
Councilman
Director of Support Services
City Engineer
3.
INVOCATION
Councilman Garvin gave the invocation.
4.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 8, 1986
APPROVED
Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve the
minutes of the December 8, 1986 meeting.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
January 12, 1987
Page 2
Motion carried 4-0; Councilwoman Moody and Councilman Ramsey abstaining
due to absence from the meeting.
5.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
None
6.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(33, 38, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49,
50, 51, 52, 53, & 54)
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the
Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 6-0.
Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved Item No. 43 to 6a and Item No. 34 to 6b.
6a. (43.)
GN 87-6 PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENTS
George Tucker, Secretary of the Charter Commission, presented the proposed
Charter changes.
Mr. Tucker stated that most of the changes were to be in compliance with
state law. Mr. Tucker stated that all of the proposed changes would be
mailed to the citizens of North Richland Hills.
Mayor Echols stated there would be a public hearing on the proposed
Charter changes on January 26, 1987. Mayor Echols stated the changes
would then be sent to the Department of Justice and, if approved, an
elect·ion would be called for sometime in August.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the
resolution passed by the Charter Commission and to set the public hearing
for January 26, 1987.
Motion carried 6-0.
6b. (34.)
PS 86-42 REQUEST OF ELLIS-ELLIS ASSOCIATES
FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, HIGHTOWER
PLAZA ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF RUFE SNOW AND HIGHTOWER)
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve PS
86-42 subject to the applicant complying with the existing
Subdivision/Drainage Ordinance.
Mr. Billy Graham, 7000 Hightower, appeared before the Council.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
January 12, 1987
Page 3
Mr. Graham stated he lived on the property adjacent to the property in
question. Mr. Graham statpd the water problem had become very intense
since houses had been built in the area, and he felt that the development
to the west would make the water problem more intense.
Mayor Echols stated that the City Master Drainage Plan spoke very
eloquently to drainage problems and dealt with the way they would be
handled, primarily through channelization.
Mr. Graham stated he was willino to meet with the developers or the City
to help solve the problem. v
Cduncilman Ramsey called for the question.
Mr. Mark Hannon, Engineer, representing Ellis and Ellis, appeared before
the Council.
Mr. Hannon stated the applicant would like for the Council to consider
this project based on the engineering design which included detention on
the property. Mr. Hannon stated they would make the request that the
Council approve the plat on the basis of using detention on site as the
engineering plans were submitted and as the preliminary plat was approved.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that could not be done because the City did not
have a Detention Pond Ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that the
Planning and Zoning Commission had attempted but did not finish a
Detention Pond Ordinance; therefore a plat could not be approved that
allowed a detention pond. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the only option the
City had was to approve the plat subject to the existing ordinance or deny
it.
Mr. Hannon stated he would have to ask his client if he wanted the plat
denied. Mr. Hannon stated they did not want the plat approved subject to
satisfying Mr. Graham.
Councilman Ramsey called point of order and called for the question.
Mr. Hannon stated his client had advised him he did not want to relinquish
the preliminary plat approval which was on the basis of detention.
Councilwoman Moody stated the detention had nothing to do with the motion.
Mr. Hannon stated that at the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting a
gentleman spoke on the proposed revision of the Drainage Ordinance. Mr.
Hannon stated the gentleman advised him of another case in the City in
which a detention pond was allowed, in fact required by the City~ Mr.
Hannon stated the City condemned the property to construct it for
londonderry Addition.
Councilman Ramsey called for point of order.
Mayor Echols called for the vote.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
January 12, 1987
Page 4
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to override the
call for the question.
Motion carried 4-2; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody,
Councilman Garvin voting for; Councilmen Ramsey and Newman voting against.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he wanted to make sure the applicant understood
a couple of things. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated it had been mentioned that
a preliminary plat was approved and the applicant went on with final
engineering. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the preliminary plat did not even
go before Council, only the Planning & Zoning Commission. Mayor Pro Tem
Davis stated the Planning and Zoning Commission went under the assumption
there would be a Detention Pond Ordinance, and the ordinance did not get
done. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the only reason the Council was voting
on this request was to either try and meet the applicant's deadline to
close the property or a financial commitment. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated
it could not be done both ways, the applicant could withdraw or the
Council could act on it.
Mr. Hannon stated the applicant did not want to withdraw and felt that the
Council had to act on it in the fashion they believed correct. Mr. Hannon
stated he was only trying to tell the Council that his client had come in
with a preliminary plat over a year ago and received approval on the basis
of having detention.
After further discussion, motion to approve subject to existing
Subdivision/Drainage Ordinance carried 5-1; Mayor Pro Tem Davis,
Councilwoman Hinkle, Councilmen Newman, Garvin and Ramsey voting for;
Councilwoman Moody voting against.
7.
PZ 86-53 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF KENNETH C. WHITELEY, TRUSTEE,
TO REZONE PART OF TRACTS 1B & 2A, D. MOSES
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1150, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE)
TO R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED EAST OF
FLAMINGO ESTATES NORTH OF THE RAILROAD)
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of this request to please come forward.
Mr. Doug Long, Engineer, representing the applicant, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Long stated they were asking for this tract to be rezoned to R-2. Mr.
Long stated the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the zoning subject
to stipulations which they were willing to abide by.
Councilwoman Moody stated that in the Planning and Zoning Minutes there
was some concern on the construction of a through street to relieve
traffic.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
January 12, 1987
Page 5
Mr. Long stated they had scheduled the street to go out to Precinct Line
Road but they had been unable to acquire the property for it. Mr. Long
stated they had bought part of the property and they were still
negotiating for the property needed to construct the street.
Councilman Garvin asked if the fifty foot easement shown was a channel
throu9h the property or just an easement for a channel.
Mr. Long stated there would be a concrete lined channpl where the easement
was shown.
Councilwoman Hinkle asked the minimum square footage of the housps.
Mr. Long replied 1,800 square feet.
Mayor Echols asked if the proceeding case would provide a means of access
back to Eden Road without going back to the one entry that this property
had.
Mr. Long stated there was more than one entry to the area; one was through
Flamingo Estates and one through Eden Addition.
Councilman Ramsey asked what the plans were to take the street back to
Precinct Line Road.
Mr. Long stated they did not have any plans until they could acquire the
property and work out an agreement with the landowners.
Councilman Ramsey stated that when Council heard the original Eden in
1982, the minutes of that meeting stated they intended to open a
thoroughfare to Precinct Line Road.
Mr. Long stated they did not own the property.
Councilman Ramsey asked Mr. Long if he was abiding by the statement that
the Council voted on in good faith.
Mr. Long stated they did not receive any zoning in 1982, it was denied.
Councilman Garvin stated that in the Planning and Zoning Minutes there was
a statement that the applicant had made every effort to acquire the
property to put a street through to Precinct Line Road and asked if that
was correct.
Mr. Long stated they had been in negotiations and made an offer, but it
was not accepted. Mr. long stated they had not given up negotiations.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated this was a zoning matter to determine the
highest and best use of the land.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
Mr. Christopher Childs, 7109 Hazel Place, appeared before the Council.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
January 12, 1987
Page 6
Mr. Childs stated that if the road could not be constructed through to
Precinct Line, the traffic through Eden Estates and Flamingo Estates was
going to be unsafe. Mr. Childs stated both Eden Road and Precinct Line
Road were in terrible condition.
Mayor Echols advised that the City was hoping the State would take care of
a six-lane divided thoroughfare on Precinct Line Road.
Mr. Larry South, 7304 Boca Raton, appeared before the Council.
Mr. South stated that he was against this zoning request because access to
Precinct Line Road was not sufficient, and it would be detrimental to
their equity in their homes.
Mr. Manuel Pasillas, 7400 Boca Raton, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Pasillas urged the Council to vote against this request because of the
traffic situation.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public
Hearing.
8.
ORDINANCE NO. 1422
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve
Ordinance No. 1422 with the stipulation of 1,800 square foot minimum
houses.
Councilman Garvin stated he shared the homeowners concern on traffic but
this rezoning did not put houses in now; it only gave the developer the
right to do some planning as to what he was going to develop.
Motion carried 5-1; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody,
and Councilmen Newman and Garvin voting for; Councilman Ramsey voting
against.
9.
PZ 86-54 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF KENNETH C. WHITELEY, TRUSTEE,
TO REZONE TRACTS IB & 2A, D. MOSES SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1150, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO
R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED EAST OF
EDEN ADDITION NORTH OF THE RAILROAD)
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of this request to please come forward.
Mr. Doug Long, representing the applicant, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Long presented a map of the project to the Council. Mr. Long stated
they were asking for R-3 zoning with 1,600 square foot minimum houses.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
January 12, 1987
Page 7
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opp0sition to please
come forward.
Mr. Larry South, 7304 Boca Raton, appeared beforp. the Council.
Mr. South stated that he could not see the benefit of R-3 reduced square
footage in the middle of something that was good. Mr. South stated why
put something of a lesser degree in the area.
Councilman Garvin stated he would not be in favor of the R-3 zoning if it
were not for the 50 foot concrete lined channel that would subdivide the
area. Councilman Garvin stated he had rather see single family residences
in the area instead of the developer coming back with duplex houses in the
area.
Councilwoman Moody stated the houses on Boca Raton were R-2-1,500 square
feet and the developer proposed R-3-1,600.
Mr. South stated the R-2 rating for North Richland Hills was probably
1,500 square feet, but there was not a house in Flamingo Estates less than
1,800 square feet.
Councilwoman Moody stated the map indicated R-2-1,500 square feet.
Mr. South stated the subdivision was over built.
Mr. Manuel Pasillas, 7400 Boca Raton, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Pasillas asked the Council to delay this request until traffic flow
was resolved.
Mr. Christopher Childs, 7109 Hazel Place, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Childs stated his house was only 1,650 square feet, but he would not
like to see duplexes built there. Mr. Childs stated it would be better if
larger houses were built.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis advised that 1,600 square foot was a minimum square
footage, but most developers exceeded the minimum.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public
Hearing.
10.
ORDINANCE NO. 1423
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve
Ordinance No. 1423 with the stipulation of 1,600 square foot minimum
houses.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilwoman Hinkle, Councilmen Newman and Garvin
voting for; Councilwoman Moody and Councilman Ramsey voting against.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
January 12, 1987
Page 8
RECESS
Mayor Echols called a recess.
BACK TO ORDER
Mayor Echols called the meeting back to order with the same members
present except Gene Riddle, Lee Maness, and Don Dietrich.
11.
PZ 86-56 Planning and Zoning - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF B. H. & L. JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE
A PORTION OF TRACTS 2 & 2Al, J.C. BRADFORD
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 140, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE)
TO C-l (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF KELLER SMITHFIELD ROAD AND SHADY GROVE ROAD)
Mayor Echols advised that the Public Hearing on Items 11 through 21 would
be heard together and the ordinances voted on separately.
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearings and called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of these requests to please come forward.
Mr. Doug Long, Engineer and part owner, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Long presented an overall map of the proposed zoning to the Council.
Mayor Echols asked if the development on Shady Grove was across the road
from Arrow Acres.
Mr. Long stated that Arrow Acres was farther north. Mr. Long advised that
on the 0-1 request there was a structure on the property they hoped to
remodel into an office and if it could not be remodeled they would rebuild.
Councilman Ramsey asked Mr. Long if he saw any difficulty with the R-2
zoning next to th~ C-2 zoning.
Mr. Long stated no. Mr. Long stated there was a 150 foot right-of-way
between the two and there would be a fence backing the property.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please
come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing.
12.
ORDINANCE NO. 1424
APPROVED
Councilman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve
Ordinance No. 1424.
Motion carried 6-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
!I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
January 12, 1987
Page 9
13.
PZ 86-58 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF B. H. & L. JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE
A PORTION OF TRACT 2, J.C. BRADFORD SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 140, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE)
TO C-2 (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF KELLER SMITHFIELD
ROAD AND WILSON LANE)
14.
ORDINANCE NO. 1425
APPROVED
Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve
Ordinance No. 1425.
Motion carried 6-0.
15.
PZ 86-59 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF B. H. & L. JOINT VENTURE
TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 2,
J.C. BRADFORD SURVEY, ABSTRACT 140,
FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY)
(LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
SHADY GROVE ROAD EAST OF KELLER SMITHFIELD ROAD)
16.
ORDINANCE NO. 1426
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve
Ordinance No. 1426.
Motion carried 6-0.
17.
PZ 86-60 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF B. H. & L. JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE
TRACT 5A, W.C. NEWTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1182,
AND TRACT 1, H.L. ALLEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 65,
FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO C-1 (COMMERCIAL)
(LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF PRECINCT LINE
ROAD SOUTH OF SHADY GROVE ROAD)
18.
ORDINANCE NO. 1427
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve
Ordinance No. 1427.
Motion carried 6-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
January 12, 1987
Page 10
19.
PZ 86-62 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF B. H. & L. JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE
A PORTION OF TRACT 5EIA, W. C. NEWTON SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1182, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO 0-1
(OFFICE DISTRICT) (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE
OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD NORTH OF THE
PROPOSED WILSON LANE)
20.
ORDINANCE NO. 1428
APPROVED
Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve
Ordinance No. 1428.
Motion carried 6-0.
21.
PZ 86-63 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF B. H. & L. JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE
TRACT 8B1A, S. RICHARDSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1266,
AND A PORTION OF TRACT 5EIA, W.C. NEWTON SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1182 FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO R-2
(SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED WEST OF PRECINCT
LINE ROAD NORTH OF PROPOSED WILSON LANE)
22.
ORDINANCE NO. 1429
APPROVED
Councilman Newman moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve
Ordinance No. 1429.
Motion carried 6-0.
23.
PZ 86-64 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF TONY AVANZINI TO REZONE
TRACT 3A2, DAVID MOSES SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1150, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE)
TO R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED AT
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EDEN ROAD
AND EVERGLADE DRIVE)
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of this request to please come forward.
Mr. Tony Avanzini, representing himself and John Avanzini, appeared before
the Council.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
January 12, 1987
Page 11
Mr. Avanzini stated they were asking to be rezoned to R-2; this was the
entrance to Flamingo Estates. Mr. Avanzini stated they were asking to
develop homes to better the neighborhood.
Councilman Garvin asked Mr. Avanzini if he had any problem with 1,800
square foot minimum houses.
Mr. Avanzini replied no.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to please
come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing.
24.
ORDINANCE NO. 1430
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve
Ordinance No. 1430 with the stipulation of 1800 square foot minimum houses.
Motion carried 6-0.
25.
PZ 86-65 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF DELBERT STEMBRIDGE, TRUSTEE,
TO REZONE TRACT 3, JOHN CONDRA SURVEY,
ARSTRACT 311, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE)
TO R-? (SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF STARNES ROAD AND DOUGLAS LANE)
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked to be excused from discussion because of
conflict of interest.
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of this request to please come forward.
Mr. Jackie Fluet, Consulting Engineer with Stembridge, appeared before the
Council.
Mr. Fluet stated the houses in this subdivision would be a minimum of
1,700 square feet.
Councilwoman Moody asked if he would go to 1,800 square feet.
Mr. Fluet stated he could not answer for the owners.
Councilwoman Moody asked Mr. Fluet if he would accept it with an 1,800
square foot stipulation.
Mr. Fluet replied no.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
il
il
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
January I?, 1987
Page 12
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public
Hearing.
Councilwoman Moody asked Mr. Royston about the requirements for sidewalks
in this subdivision.
Mr. Royston stated the Sidewalk Ordinance specified that any street 60
feet or wider had to have sidewalks and Starnes and Douglas were both 60
foot streets.
26.
ORDINANCE NO. 1431
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve
Ordinance No. 1431 with the stipulation of 1700 square foot minimum houses.
Motion carried 4-1; Counfilman Garvin, Ramsey, Newman and Councilwoman
Hinkle voting for; Councilwoman Moody voting against, and Mayor Pro Tem
Davis abstaining.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis returned to the Council table.
27.
PZ 86-66 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF DEBRA JACKSON TO REZONE TRACT 3A1,
WILLIAM COX SURVEY, ABSTRACT 321, FROM AG
(AGRICULTURE) TO C-l (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED
AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAVIS BOULEVARD
AND TURNER DRIVE)
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of this request to please come forward.
Ms. Debra Jackson, 8223 Turner, owner, appeared before the Council.
Ms. Jackson stated this property was located at the corner of Turner and
Davis Boulevard and had an older residence located on it which she would
like to have rezoned to commercial.
Councilman Ramsey asked Ms. Jackson if she understood she would have to
participate in street improvements.
Ms. Jackson stated yes, she was aware of the requirements to participate.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public
Hearing.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
January 12, 1987
Page 13
28.
ORDINANCE NO. 1432
APPROVED
Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Counci1man Newman, to approve
Ordinance No. 1432.
Motion carried 6-0.
29.
PZ 86-67 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF CHARLES SCHREINER NELSON TO REZONE
TRACT 2, S. RICHARDSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1266,
AND TRACT 1, ALEXANDER HOOD SURVEY, ABSTRACT 683,
FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY)
(LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF KELLER SMITHFIELD
ROAD NORTH OF BURSEY ROAD)
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of this request to please come forward.
Mr. Wes Shaver, representing the applicant, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Shaver presented a location map to the Council. Mr. Shaver stated the
houses would be a minimum of 1,800 square feet.
Mr. Jack Frisque, representing Green Valley Homeowners Association,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Frisque stated he was speaking in favor of this request. Mr. Frisque
stated that he felt the developer had worked long and hat~d with the
homeowners in the area. Mr. Frisque stated the homeowners had a very good
experience with this developer.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public
Hearing.
30.
ORDINANCE NO. 1433
APPROVED
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve
Ordinance No. 1433 with the stipulation of 1,800 square foot minimum
houses.
Motion carried 6-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
I
I
January 12, 1987
Page 14
31.
PZ 86-69 PLANNING AND ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF CHARLES SCHREINER NELSON
TO REZONE TRACT 2, S. RICHARDSON SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1266, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE)
TO C-2 (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF KELLER SMITHFIELD
ROAD AND WILSON LANE)
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of this request to please come forward.
Mr. Wes Shavp.r, representing the applicant, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Shaver stated this tract contained 9.7 acres and the request was for
C-2 zoning. Mr. Shaver stated this tract was located at the southwest
corner of Keller-Smithfield Road and Wilson Lane. Mr. Shaver stated that
most of the 100 foot right-of-way for the widening of Wilson Lane was on
their property.
Mr. Jack Frisque, representing Green Valley Homeowners Association,
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Frisque stated he was present to speak in behalf of this request.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public
Hearing.
32.
ORDINANCE NO. 1434
APPROVED
Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve
Ordinance No. 1434.
Motion carried 6-0.
*33.
PS 86-54 REQUEST OF HARSTON GRAVEL COMPANY
FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 5RA & 5R2A, BLOCK 3,
INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION (LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WULIGAR WAY
AND BROWNING COURT)
APPROVED
.34
PS 86-42 (MOVED TO ITEM 6B)
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
January 12, 1987
Page 15
35.
PS 86-57 AMENDMENT TO THE
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING
THE USE OF RETENTION PONDS IN
DRAINAGE DESIGN,
ORDINANCE NO. 1435
TABLED
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to table Ordinance
No. 1435.
Motion carried 6-0.
36.
SO 87-1 REQUEST OF IKE HARRIS CO.
FOR VARIANCE TO SECTION 6.3(A) OF
THE SIGN ORDINANCE REGARDING THE
LOCATION OF REAL ESTATE PROJECT SIGNS
DENIED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilman Rams~y, to deny SO 87-1.
Mr. Arnold Pent appeared before the Council.
Mr. Pent stated this property had been sold to Ike Harris and he would
like to put a sign on Rufe Snow Drive to identify Windsor Park
Subdivision. Mr. Pent stated he understood there was a change in the Sign
Ordinance that was being proposed.
Mayor Echols advised the change in the Ordinance was what was behind the
motion to deny. Mayor Echols stated the proposed change in the Ordinance
would permit this type of sign rather than a variance having to be granted.
Mr. Pent asked how long it would be before the Ordinance was revised.
Mayor Echols stated he could not give a definite time.
Mr. Pent asked if a temporary sign could be installed and if the reV1Slon
of the ordinance did not allow such signage, they would remove the sign.
Mavor Echols stated the motion that had been made would have to be
defeated and a new motion made that would allow the temporary sign.
Mr. Dick Blackard, agent of Ike Harris, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Blackard asked the Council to grant the variance or a temporary sign.
Councilman Ramsey withdrew his second.
Mayor Pro Tern Davis seconded the motion.
Councilman Garvin stated the Council had turned down a similar request a
few months before and it would not be fair to grant this request.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
January 12, 1987
Page 16
Motion carried 5-1; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody,
Councilmen Newman and Garvin voting for and Councilman Ramsey voting
against.
37.
SO 87-2 REQUEST OF 8URK COLLINS INVESTMENTS
FOR VARIANCE TO SECTION 4.1(8) OF THE
SIGN ORDINANCE FOR AN ADDITIONAL GROUND SIGN
AT OLDE TOWNE SQUARE CENTER
APPROVED
Mr'. Burk Collins, applicant, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Collins stated that he had been under the impression that for each
platted property you were allowed a separate sign. Mr. Collins stated he
had a signed lease with Pier I in Old Towne Square which included the
installment of this sign.
Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked if this was a separatp platted lot.
Mr. Collins replied yes.
Mayor Echols asked how much frontage the lot had.
Mr. Collins replied a little over 200 feet.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve SO
87-2.
Motion carried 6-0.
*38.
GN 87-1 INTERLOCAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT
FOR THE GREATER DALLAS-FORT WORTH REGION,
RESOLUTION NO. 87-2
APPROVED
*39.
GN 87-2 NEW SIGNS FOR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES
APPROVED
*40.
GN 87-3 REQUEST TO AUTHORIZE A
LIABILITY RISK ANALYSIS STUDY
BY THE WYATT COMPANY
APPROVED
41.
GN 87-4 APPOINTMENT TO VARIOUS BOARDS/COMMISSIONS
Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to make the
following appointments: Joe Crane to the Board of Appeals; Carole Flippo
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
January 12, 1987
Page 17
as a voting member to the Planning and Zoning Commission; and Manny
Tricoli as an Alternate to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Motion carried 6-0.
*42.
GN 87-5 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING TORT REFORM,
RESOLUTION NO. 87-3
APPROVED
.43
GN 86-7 (MOVED TO ITEM 6A)
*44.
GN 87-7 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING TEXAS WAR ON CRIME,
RESOLUTION NO. 87-4
APPROVED
- - ~- *45 .
PU 87-1 BID AWARD TO BUSINESS INTERIORS
FOR OFFICE FURNITURE IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,424.92
APPROVED
*46.
PU 87-2 BID AWARD TO BEALL CONTRACTORS SUPPLY
FOR ONE 35 H.P. CONCRETE/ASPHALT SAW
IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,825.00
APPROVED
*47.
PU 87-3 PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER
FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT ADDITION
APPROVED
*48.
PU 87-4 PARKING LOT PAVING, PARK MAINTENANCE
FACILITY ON CHAPMAN ROAD
APPROVED
*49.
PU 87-5 EMERGENCY BID AWARD
TO ORKIN PEST CONTROL FOR
TERMITE EXTERMINATION AT PROPOSED
LIBRARY AND RECREATION CENTER
APPROVED
*50.
PW 87-1 BRIDGE LOAD POSTING AGREEMENT
WITH STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT,
RESOLUTION NO. 87-1
APPROVED
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
January 12, 1987
Page 18
*51.
PW 87-2 CHANGE ORDER 1, GLENVIEW
DRIVE UTILITY ADJUSTMENT
APPROVED
*52.
PW 87-3 BIG BEAR CREEK WASTEWATER
INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM CONTRACT BETWEEN
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY AND
THREE OTHER CITIES
APPROVED
*53.
PW 87-4 PROPOSED AMENDMENT - CHANGE ORDERS 5-11
FOR 1985 MISCELLANEOUS WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS TO LOWELL B. ALLISON CONTRACT
IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,518.00
APPROVED
*54.
PW 87-5 REQUEST OF SAM JOINT VENTURE
FOR RELEASE OF A 10 FOOT UTILITY
EASEMENT IN EDEN ADDITION,
RESOLUTION NO. 87-6
APPROVED
55.
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
None
56.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to adjourn the
meeting.
Motion carried 6-0.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
ø ..
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
1/26/87
- Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: PZ 86-75
Request of Charles Schreiner Nelson for
Appeal Hearing
Charles Schreiner Nelson interests appeared before the Planning and Zoning Commission on
January 8, 1987 requesting rezoning from R-2 Single Family to R-8 Zero-Lot-Line Single
Family on Tract lA S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, located on the south side of
Wilson Lane west of Smithfield Road.
The Planning and Zoning Commission denied the rezoning request. The applicants are
appealing that denial. Should the City Council grant the appeal hearing the earliest
available date will be February 23, 1987.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should set the date of the Appeal Hearing.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
¡(c~~
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
... . . .
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
BAYER & Associates, Inc.
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
Land Development · Planning · Municipal Public Works
January 15, 1987
Mr. Richard Roys ton
Director Planning / Development
P.O. Box 18609
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: PZ 86-75
B & A J86125
,.ÞÞ
Dear Mr. Royston
In regards to the above zoning case that was denied by The
Planning and Zoning Commission on January 8, 1987, we are asking
for an appeal to The City Council. Please 1nfo~ us of the appeal
motion.
Sincerely,
...
~~.eUlðÞ~
James R. Wicker
Land Planner
~
c.c.
Wes Shaver
2212 Arlington Downs · Suite 102 · Arlington,ltexas 76011
(817) 649-5924 Metro 640-704.3
I'
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I
Department:
Planning and Development
-Council Meeting Date:
1/26/87
I
Subject:
Proposed Sign Ordinance Revisions
SO 87-3
Agenda Number:
I
I
At the directive of the City Council the Staff has prepared a comprehensive revision of
the Sign Ordinance. Significant changes have been proposed in several areas of the
Ordinance. The following is a list of the proposed revisions and their impact upon the
Ordinance.
(1) Section 2.16
"Zoning Ordinance" now refers to the current Ordinance.
I
I
(2) Section 3.1 (b)
Temporary Signs may be permitted even if the permanent signs are not in
compliance on a commercial site.
(3) Section 3.8 (b)
Sign Permit charges have been revised upward to cover administrative and plan
review costs.
I
(4) Section 4.1 (C)
Large Shopping Centers and etc. with more than one significant street
frontage may apply for a ground sign for each street frontage. Staff may approve these
requests.
(5) Section 4.6 (a)
~ Service Station Canopies are deemed structure with wall surfaces for sign
~calculation purposes.
(6) Section 4.7 (a)
Townhome District is allowed project identification signs, the same as
presently allowed in R-7MF Districts. The number of signs allowed is revised while
retaining the maximum sign area.
(7) Section 5.5
Signs mounted on vehicle roofs are allowed the same as other vehicle signs
with specific size controls.
(8) Section 6.1 (k)
Temporary Signs may advertise more than one business. Each business is
charged for a sign permit.
(9) Section 6.4 (a)
Any off-site residential project sign must be located on vacant commercial
property, rather than residential as currently allowed. A minimum spacing of 200 foot
spacing is proposed between signs. The present limitation of no more than one on-site
and one off-site sign per development is continued.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
1 ~ Oper "ng Budget
I ~ 0 er
I 7
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
K/~
.
City Manager
, Finance Director
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
2
Paqe 1 of __
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(10) Section 6.7 (a)
Religious and Civic Organizations may have temporary signs on-site without a
permit fee. No more than two signs are proposed to be allowed at anyone time.
(11) Section 6.7 (b)
Religious and Civic Organizations may advertise by temporary signs off-site
subject to permit fees.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed revisions to the Sign
Ordinance.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Page 2 of 2
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ORDINANCE NO._L~2_
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS WITHIN THE CITY
LIMITS OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS; DEFINING TERMS;
REQUIRING A PERMIT FOR ERECTION OF A SIGN AND PROVIDING FOR A
SCHEDULE OF FEES; REGULATING THE AREA OF SIGNS PERMITTED:
PROVIDING FOR A SERIES OF GENERAL CONDITIONS; REGULATING
TEMPORARY SIGNS; REGULATING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF SIGNS;
REGULATING BILLBOARDS; PROHIBITING OBNOXIOUS SIGNS AND SIGNS
EXPLOITING SEX; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF A
FINE NOT LESS THAN $50.00 NOR IN EXCESS OF $1000.00; AND
REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT
HERETO; PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING THAT
THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE IN FORCE AND EFFECT FROM AND AFTER
THE DATE OF ITS ADOPTION AND PUBLICATION.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH
RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
ARTICLE 1.
PREAMBLE: PURPOSE OF THE ORDINANCE
The sign regulations as herein established have been made for
the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the City of North Richland Hills. The Ordinance
contains standards regulating the use, size, location,
construction and maintenance of signs. The intent of the
regulations is to protect values within the City of North
Richland Hills, to enhance the beauty of the City and to
protect the general public from damage and injury which may
be caused by the unregulated construction of signs.
ARTICLE 2.
DEFINITIONS
SECTION 2.1 AREA OF SIGN.
"Area of Sign" shall mean the total area within the extreme
perimeter of the attraction area intended to draw attention
to the sign, including all open spaces and supports which the
s~gn rest upon if said supports are designed to attract
attention to sign. The area of the sign with two (2) faces,
approximately opposed, shall be that of the larger face if
such condition prevails; but, if the angle between the planes
of the faces exceeds thirty (30) degrees the total area of
both faces shall be considered the sign area. For
multi-sided or circular signs, the area shall be the total
projected area.
SECTION 2.2 BILLBOARD.
"Billboard" shall mean any freestanding sign, signboard or
I
I
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
outdoor advertising display which is used for advertising
purposes or display purposes, except advertising displays
used exclusively:
(8) To advertise the sales or lease of the property upon
which such advertising displays are to be placed.
(b) To designate the name of the owner or the occupant of
the premises upon which such advertising display is
placed, or to identify such premises.
(c) To advertise goods manufactured, produced, or for sale
or service rendered. on the property upon which such
advertising display is placed.
SECTION 2.3 BUILDING LINE
"Building Line" shall be established by the Zoning
Ordinance.
SECTION 2.4 FACE OF BUILDING.
"Face of Building" shall mean the general outer surface not
including cornices, bay windows, or other ornamental trim, of
any main exterior wall of the bUilding.
SECTION 2.5 LIMITED ACCESS FREEWAY.
"Limited Access Freeway" shall be deemed to mean a highway
to which the right of access to or from abutting lands is
controlled and restricted by the State of Texas or the City
of North Richland Hills. Further, a "Limited Access Freeway"
shall be bordered on each side by access roads (or right-of-
way for access roads). "Limited Access Freeways" within the
City of North Richland Hills are Interstate 820 and Airport
Freeway (S8 121) only.
SECTION 2.6 GROUND SIGN.
"Ground Sign" shall mean a sign not wholly supported on a
building or which has its main supporting structure depending
upon the ground for attachment.
SECTION 2.7 PROJECTING SIGN.
¡"Projecting Sign" shall mean a sign suspended fro. or
supported from a bUilding or structure and projecting out
therefrom more than one (1) foot.
SECTION 2.8 ROOF SIGN.
"Roof Sign" shall mean any sign supported by the roof of a
building or placed above the apparent flat roof or eaves of a
bUilding as viewed from any elevation.
I
I
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I"
I
SECTION 2.9 SIGN.
"Sign" shall mean a display board, screen, structure,
object or part therof, used to announce, declare, demon-
strate, display or otherwise advertise and attract the
attention of the public to any business, service or product
provided on the premises upon which sign is placed, other
than:
(a) Official notices authorized by a court, public body or
public officer; and.
(b) directional, warning or information signs authorized
by federal, state or municipal authority.
SECTION 2.10 TEMPORARY SIGN.
"Temporary Sign" shall mean a sign, banner, pennant, flag
or advertising display constructed of cloth, canvas, light
fabric, cardboard, wallboard or other light material with or
without frames intended to be displayed for a short period of
time only. Trailer and portable signs are classified as
"Temporary Signs."
SECTION 2.11 WALL SIGN.
"Wall Sign" shall mean any sign painted on, attached to or
projecting from the wall surface of a bUilding (including
permanent window sign and signs on awnings and/or marquees).
A wall sign shall not project above the apparent flat roof
or eave line as viewed from all elevations, or more than one
foot from the surface of the wall.
SECTION 2.12 MARQUEE SIGN.
"Marquee Sign" shall include any hood or awning or
permanent construction projecting from the wall of a bUilding
or other structure.
SECTION 2.13 DEVELOPMENT.
"Development" shall mean any nonresidential property
improvement or properties improved as a unit with a common
parking area that is contiguous to the development. A
shopping center under single or multiple ownership
cqnstitutes a development.
SECTION 2.14 QUALIFIED STREET FRONTAGE.
"Qualified Street Frontage" shall mean the width of
property along the street of a commercial or industrial
development which bears the address of the property.
SECTION 2.15 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN.
"Traffic Control Sign" shall be any sign used only to
control and direct traffic on private property (e.g., "ENTER"
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
or "EXIT') without logo or advertising messages.
SECTION 2.16 ZONING DISTRICT.
"Zoning District" referred to in this Ordinance shall be as
defined in the Zoning Ordinance of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas, Ordinance Number 1080 and subsequent
amendments.
ARTICLE 3.
SIGN PERMIT AND FEES
SECTION 3.1 SIGN PERMIT REQUIRED.
(a) No person shall erect, alter or add to a sign or sign
structure, except as provided by this Ordinance and
unless a permit for the same has been issued by the
Building Official or other person he/she may authorize
of the City. Where signs are illuminated by electric
lighting, a separate electrical permit shall be
obtained as required by the Electrical Code of The
City.
(b) No sign permit shall be issued for any additional
signs or alterations to eXisting signs until all signs
on the property or development conform to the provi-
sions of this Ordinance.
EXCEPTION: Temporary signs.
SECTION 3.2 OFFICIAL, QUASI-OFFICIAL AND DIRECTIONAL SIGN.
(a) Nothing herein contained shall prevent the erection,
construction and maintenance of official traffic, fire
and police signs, signals, devices and markings of the
State, City or other appropriate governmental
authorities, nor the posting of notices required by
law. Private and quasi-public signs shall be
prohibited upon public property unless authorized by
the City of North Richland Hills or other appropriate
governmental authorities.
(b) Legal notices, telephone and other underground utility
warning signs, not exceeding one (1) square foot in
size and other safety signs may be erected without a
permit being issued.
(c) Nonadvertising, directional or informational signs
less than six (6) square feet in area may be used
without a permit in zoning districts R-7-MF, 0-1, LR,
C, I and PD as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of North Richland Hills.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
SECTION 3.3 APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT.
Application for sign permit shall be made to the Building
Department accompanied by the filing fee in the amount
provided for by Section 3.8 for each development on which the
sign or signs are to be erected and shall contain or have
attached thereto the following information:
(a) Name, address and telephone number of the applicant;
(b) Location of building, structure or lot to which or
upon which the sign or advertising structure is to
be attached or erected:
(c) Position of the sign or advertising structure in
relation to nearby buildings or structures;
(d) Two (2) blueprints or ink drawings of the plans and
specifications and method of construction and
attachment to the bUildings or in the ground;
(e) Copy of stress sheets and calculations showing the
structures are designed for deadload and wind pressure
in any direction in the amount required by this and
all other laws and ordinances of the City. The Build-
ing Code of the City, which is the current edition of
the Uniform Building Code, shall apply for design of
any sign structure;
(f) Name of person, firm, corporation or association
erecting structure or painting the sign;
(g) Written consent of the owner of the building,
structure or land to which or on which the structure
is to be erected or sign to be painted.
(h) Any electrical permit required and issued for such
sign;
(i) Estimated sign value;
(j) Detailed plans of all existing signs, including
photos and/or other pertinent data which will aid
in the determination of the sites conformance with
this Ordinance;
(k) Such other information as the Building Official shall
require to show full compliance with this and all
other laws and ordinances of the City;
(1) In addition to the filing fee, a sign permit fee
shall be collected in accordance with the schedule
of Section 3.8.
SECTION 3.4 NONCONFORMING SIGNS.
All applications for sign permits for signs which do not
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
conform to the provisions of this Ordinance or are located on
the same property or development on which other signs do not
conform with the provisions of this Ordinance shall be
submitted by the Building Official to the Director of
Planning and Development for review in accordance with the
provisions of Article 10 of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3.5 APPROVAL OF TRAFFICE ENGINEER.
If in the opinion of the Building Official the plans and
specifications indicate that the sign or sign structure might
interfere with, mislead or confuse traffic, or in any place
where a ground sign is to be placed on a corner lot, then the
applicant shall submit a traffic engineer certification with
the application.
SECTION 3.6 ISSUANCE OF PERMITS.
If it shall appear the proposed sign structure is in
compliance with all the requirements of this Ordinance and
all other laws and Ordinances of the City of North Richland
Hills and has received approval where necessary, the Building
Department shall then issue the sign permit. If the work
authorized under a sign permit has not been completed within
ninety (90) days or a proper extension granted thereto after
date of issuance, the said permit shall become null and void.
Issuance of the sign permit shall be conditioned upon the
applicant's acceptance of any conditions imposed thereon by
the City. No sign permit issued with conditions shall be
valid until all conditions have been complied with by the
applicant.
SECTION 3.7 UNSAFE AND UNLAWFUL SIGNS.
(a) Signs and sign structures including those existing
prior to this Ordinance shall be maintained at all times in a
state of good repair, safe and s~cure with all braces, bolts,
slips, supporting frame and fastenings free from deterior-
ation, termite infestation, rot, rust or loosening, able to
withstand at all times the wind pressure for which they were
originally designed.
(b) No person maintaining any sign, sign structure or
billboard shall fail to keep the ground space within eight
(8) feet from the base of the said sign, signboard, billboard
or advertising structure free and clear of weeds, rubbish and
other flammable waste material.
(c) If the Building Official or other person helshe may
appoint shall find that any sign or other advertising
structure regulated herein as unsafe or insecure, or as a
menace to the public, or has been constructed or erected or
is being maintained in violation of the provisions of this
section, the permittee or owner thereof shall be given
written notice. If the permittee or owner fails to remove
or alter the structure so as to comply with the standards
herein set forth within thirty (30) days after such notice,
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,-
I
such sign or advertising structure may be removed or altered
to comply by the City of North Richland Hills at the expense
of the permittee or owner of the property upon which it is
located. The Building Official shall refuse to issue any
subsequent building, electrical, plumbing or mechanical
permits for the property on which the offending sign was
located if any owner or permittee shall refuse to pay costs
so assessed.
The Building Official may cause any sign or other advertising
structure which is an immediate peril to persons or property
to be removed by giving at least forty-eight (48) hours
notice.
(d) The Building Official or other person he/she may
appoint may cause any illegal temporary sign, including
flags, pennants, banners and temporary window signs to be
removed within a twenty-four (24) hour period.
SECTION 3.8 FILING AND PERMIT FEES.
(a) Permanent signs and billboards: application and plan
review fees shall be $50.00 for permanant signs and
billboards.
Sign permit fees shall be based on the value of the
sign in accordance with the following:
Monetary Value of
Proposed Work
Base Fee + Percentage of
Estimated Cost
00 -
501 -
1,501 -
3,001 -
5,001 -
50,001 -
100,001 -
500,001
500
1,500
3,000
5,000
50,000
100,000
500,000
or more
$
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
0.00 +
50.00 +
150.00 +
650.00 +
.7%
.6%
.5%
.4%
(b) Temporary Signs: a single filing/permit fee of:
1st sign
2nd sign
3rd sign
$ 25.00
20.00
15.00
ARTICLE 4.
AREA OF SIGN PERMITTED
SECTION 4.1 SIGNS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL.
(a) For signing purposes, frontage on private streets that
serve as public thoroughfares and not just driveways may,
with City Council approval. be considered as qualified street
frontage.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
(b) Anyone (1) development may have a choice of, but not
more than, one (1) ground sign, one (1) roof sign or one (1)
projecting sign, subject to the requirements contained in
Section 4.2 through 4.8.
(c) In the case of very large developments (e.g., shopping
centers, apartment complexes, etc.) with substantial street
frontages; i.e. 350 linear feet or greater, on two or more
streets, additional ground signs may be permitted for each
street providing that all signs requested must meet the
provisions of Section 4.2. And further providing that all
streets on which additional signs are requested must have
Commercial or Industrial zoning on both sides of the street.
SECTION 4.2 GROUND SIGNS.
Ground signs are subject to the following provisions:
(a) One (1) ground or pole sign may be permitted for each
300 linear feet of qualified street frontage with each
development in all zoning districts except AG and all
of the R districts.
(b) The total area of sign permitted for a ground sign
shall be measured as one (1) square foot of area of
sign for each linear foot of street frontage, to a
maximum area of sign of 300 square feet for anyone
sign.
(c) The maximum height of any ground sign and its support-
ing structure shall be twenty-five (25) feet, except
that the height of a ground sign may be increased by
adding one (1) foot at height for each linear foot the
sign is back from the adjacent property lines, not to
exceed a maximum height of fifty (50) feet to the top
of the sign.
(d) The height of any ground sign may not exceed one-half
(1/2) the shortest linear distance from the location of
the sign to the nearest boundary of any AG or R zoning
districts.
(e) The sign shall not project over the property line of
the development, right-ot-way or over any area within
ten (10) feet of the curb of a public street or
thoroughfare.
(f) A minimum qualified frontage of 100 feet shall be
required to erect a ground sign.
(g) Permanent attachment to the ground shall be required
for all ground signs.
SECTION 4.3 ROOF SIGNS.
Roof signs permitted are subject to the fOllowing provisions:
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
(a) One (1) roof sign may be permitted with each develop-
ment on all zoning districts except AG and R districts.
(b) Roof sign shall not project over the edge of the roof
or eave.
{c} The maximum permitted area of roof signing shall be
one (1) square foot of sign area for each linear foot
of property frontage not to exceed a maximum of 100
square feet.
(d) The height of a roof sign shall not exceed ten (10)
feet above the apparent flat roof or eave line.
(e) Roof sign supports should be architecturally
attractive or screened from view.
SECTION 4.4 PROJECTING SIGNS.
Projecting signs permitted are subject to the following
provisions.
(a) One (1) projecting sign may be permitted with each
development in all zoning districts except AG and R
districts.
(b) Projecting signs shall not project over the property
line of the development, right-of-way or over any area
within ten (10) feet of the curb of a public street or
thoroughfare.
(c) Projection of sign shall not extend more than four
(4) feet from any wall facing.
(d) The total permitted area of a projecting sign shall be
measured as one (1) square foot of sign area for each
linear foot of property frontage not to exceed a
maximum of 100 square feet.-
SECTION 4.5 THEATER MARQUEES.
Theater marquees need not be limited to projecting sign
criteria, but shall be subjected to individual approval by
the City Council.
SECTION 4.6 WALL SIGNS: COMMERCIAL ZONES.
Wall signs shall be permitted in commercial or industrial
zoning district development provided the total area of all
wall signs on anyone (1) wall face shall not exceed twenty
five (25%) percent of the total wall area also to include
valance and permanent window signs. A wall sign shall not
project above the apparent flat roof or eave line.
(a) In service station uses when a canopy is provided over
the pump area, wall signs located on the facia area of the
canopy or suspended on the supports of the canopy, may be
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
permitted provided the total area of all signs does not
exceed 25% of the total facia area of the canopy.
SECTION 4.7 SIGNS: RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL ZONES.
All signs are prohibited in AG and all R zoning districts
except as follows:
(a) MUlti-family developments in R-7-MF and R-6-T zoning
districts shall be allowed wall or ground signs
for identification purposes only for each street
frontage. The total area of such signs shall not exceed
one (1) square foot per residential unit, or thirty-two
(32) square feet, whichever is least. Ground signs in
these districts shall not exceed a height of four (4)
feet above grade.
In developments providing solid masonary screening
along street frontages, approved wall signs may be
installed in such screeening walls.
(b) Wall signs may be used with any residential use in AG
and all R zoning districts with exception of R-7-MF,
with a maximum area of sign of two (2) square feet per
sign with a limit of two (2) signs for anyone (1)
occupancy, and may be erected without a permit being
issued.
(c) In AG zoning districts, legitimate agricultural
businesses or enterprises shall be permitted ground,
roof, projecting or wall signs in accordance with the
restrictions of Sections 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 4.6 except
that the total area of all signs shall not exceed 100
square feet and the height of any ground sign shall not
exceed fifteen (15) feet above grade. A permit Is
required for all these signs.
SECTION 4.8 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS.
(a) The maximum area of anyone traffic control sign shall
be two (2) square feet.
(b) Traffic control signs are not permitted in AG and all
R zoning districts with exception of the R-7-MF
district.
(c) Traffic control signs shall not include any advertis-
ing or attention attracting lighting, symbols, logos or
shapes.
(d) Traffic control signs may pertain to either vehicular
or pedestrian traffic.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
ARTICLE 5.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 5.1 INTERFERENCE WITH BUILDING REGULATIONS.
No sign shall be erected in such a manner that any portion
of its surface or supports will interfere in anyway with the
free use of any fire escape, exit, standpipe, or windows or
obstruct any required ventilator or door stairway.
SECTION 5.2 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT.
(8) No sign permit shall be issued for any sign or
billboard which encroaches upon or over any City owned or
controlled property unless an encroachment permit therefor is
obtained from the City Councilor State agency in charge.
(b) No encroachment permit for any sign or billboard shall
be issued unless in the opinion of the Building Official the
erection and maintenance of said sign shall not imperil the
health, safety and welfare of the public. Any such permit
may be issued subject to such conditions as the City Council
deems to be reasonably necessary for the protection of the
public.
SECTION 5.3 PROJECTION OVER PRIVATE PROPERTY.
No sign may project more than six (6) inches from the face
of a building over private property used or intended to be
used by the general public, unless there is a minimum of
eight (8) feet clearance from the bottom of the sign to
sidewalk or grade immediately below the sign, or a minimum of
fourteen (14) feet clearance from the bottom of the sign to a
vehicular trafficway immediately below the sign.
SECTION 5.4 MEMORIAL SIGNS AND HISTORICAL TABLETS.
Nothing herein contained shall prevent the City Council
from granting special permits on such terms as it may deem
proper, for signs advertising or pertaining to any civic,
patriotic or special event of general public interest taking
place within the boundaries of the City, when it is
determined that the same will not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare, interest or safety, nor injurious to
adjacent property or improvements.
SECTION 5.5 VEHICLE ADVERTISING.
No sign or advertising shall be erected or attached to any
vehicle except for those signs which are painted directly on
or mounted flush to the surface, or mounted directly on the
roof of the vehicle. No roof mounted signs shall project more
than 24 inches above the roof of the vehicle. All vehicles
which have signs or advertising shall be in working order and
shall be in compliance with all applicable vehicle safety
laws when signs are in place. All such vehicles shall have
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
current registration and inspection stickers and shall be
regularly used for transportation purposes.
SECTION 5.6 LIGHTING.
(a) Signs may be illuminated or nonilluminated.
Illumination may be either by internal. internal-indirect or
indirect lighting as defined in (b), (c) and (d). Lighting
shall be so installed as to avoid any glare or reflection
into adjacent property, or onto a street or alley to create a
traffic hazard. When not necessary for security, it is
suggested that lighting be turned off as soon after business
hours as is reasonable, especially for signs in close
proximity to residential areas.
(b) "Internal Lighting" means a source of illumination
entirely within the sign which makes the contents of the sign
visible at night by means of the light being transmitted
through a translucent material but wherein the source of the
illumination is not visible.
(c) "Internal-Indirect Lighting" means a source of
illumination entirely within the sign (generally a free
standing letter) which makes the sign visible at night by
means of lighting the background upon which the free standing
character is mounted. The character itself shall be opaque,
and thus will be silhouetted against the background. The
source of illumination shall not be visible.
(d) "Indirect Lighting" means a source of external
illumination located a distance away from the sign, which
lights the sign, but which itself is not visible to persons
viewing the sign from any normal position of view.
SECTION 5.7 ROTATING, MOVING, FLASHING. CHANGING OR BLINKING
SIGNS.
Rotating, moving, flashing, changing or blinking signs shall
not be permitted. However, "message signs" (for example:
time and temperature, etc.) may be permitted as approved on
an individual basis be the City Council, giving adequate
consideration to traffic safety hazards posed by the size
and location of the proposed sign.
ARTICLE 6.
TEMPORARY SIGNS
SECTION 6.1 TEMPORARY SIGNS.
Excpt as otherwise provided in this Ordinance:
(a) No person may erect a temporary sign as defined in
Section 2.10 without a permit obtained from the
Building Department.
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
(b) No temporary or portable sign shall be erected or
placed to advertise a business, industry or pursuit
except on the premises on which the business, industry
or pursuit is conducted.
(c) No temporary or portable sign shall be erected or
placed on any public property or right-of-way, utility
pole, light pole, or traffic control sign or pole.
(d) No temporary sign shall be displayed for more than
thirty (30) days per permit received.
(e) A maximum of three (3) temporary sign permits per year
shall be issued to anyone business, industry or
pursuit.
(f) Temporary signs shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet
in area.
(g) No temporary or portable sign shall be erected or
placed within fifteen (15) feet of the curb or street
except for those which may be mounted on the wall of a
building which is closer than fifteen (15) feet to the
curb or street.
(h) No temporary or portable sign may be erected or placed
in any location that constitutes a safety or traffic
hazard.
(i) No temporary or portable sign may be erected or placed
in a parking space.
(j) Non-conforming temporary signs or temporary signs with-
out permits may be impounded by the City forty-eight
hours after notice is given to the owner or party
responsible for the sign.
(k) Each temporary sign may advertise one or more
individual businesses. However, for each business
advertised a separate permit fee will be required and
each business will be charged for the advertisement
against its allowed three (3) permits per year as
stated in Subsection (e).
(1) Trailer and portable signs shall bear in letters of not
less than one (1) inch in height the company name of
the sign owner and telephone number on each unit. These
must be current or they will be classified as
non-conforming signs and subject to Subsection (j).
SECTION 6.2 REAL ESTATE SIGNS.
Permits shall not be requred for the following types of real
estate signs:
(a) One (1) temporary sign announcing the offering for sale
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i'
I
or rental of 1nduvidually platted residential or commercial
property on which it is placed shall be allowed in any dis-
trict and may be placed in any yard. Such sign shall not
exceed five (5) square feet in area; it shall be removed
within one (1) week following the close of sale or lease.
(b) On nonresidential commercial property where there is a
business building, one (1) temporary unlighted sign offering
all or a portion of the same for sale or rental shall be
allowed flat against any wall of the business bUilding. Such
sign shall be no taller than the wall and shall have an area
no larger than 100 square feet. Such sign shall be removed
within one (1) week following the close of sale or lease.
(c) On undeveloped property, temporary unlighted signs
offering the same for sale or lease shall be allowed. Such
signs shall be located at least twenty-five (25) feet behind
any curb or ten (10) feet behind any property line, whichever
greater; and shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height.
The total area of all sign message surfaces of all such signs
shall not exceed one (1) square foot per one (1) lineal foot
of street frontage of the property for sale or 100 square
feet on each street fronting such property; whichever is
smaller. Only one (1) sign per street frontage shall be
permitted. Each sign shall be removed within one (1) week
following the close of the sale or lease.
SECTION 6.3 WEEKEND BUILDERS ADVERTISING.
(CITY ORDINANCE NO. 1418)
The City of North Richland Hills' Policy for Weekend
Advertising, as expressed in this Ordinance, is extended to
homebuilders for the purpose of guiding the weekend motoring
public to available residential properties. The policy 1s
intended as a benefit also to the buying public. These
provisions are designed to allow temporary directional signs
without resulting in an excess that may prove offensive to
others of the public. The policy -should serve also as "common
sense" guidelines in places where direct application is
unclear.
(1) Schedule: Signs will be allowed between 12PM Friday and
12PM Monday. A holiday falling on Friday or Monday will
be considered part of the weekend.
(2) Sign Size: Signs shall not exceed 24" by 30" in size,
not be installed more than 3 feet above grade.
(3) Spacing of Signs: A minimum of 30 feet must be held
between all signs, and signs for anyone advertiser
must be at least 200 feet apart.
(4) Sign Location:
"a" Not closer than 40 feet to a street intersection
or median opening.
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{'
I
"b" Not closer than 3 feet from the edge of the sign
to the street curb (or edge of pavement). Signs should
not encroach either the sidewalks or street.
"c" Not in a motorist "visibility triangle".
Generally, if a sign 1s close to blocking motorist
visiblility, it should be moved (see "atl above).
"d" Not more than 3 miles from the subject property.
(5) Signs should be rigid, 2 dimensional displays that
advertise new residential property, tlfor sale" only
(not lease property), guiding the motorist to a
specific location in North Richland Hills.
These are the guidelines under which this policy will be
administered, relating particularly to the weekend/motoring/
home-buying customer. It is the responsibility of the builder
to secure permission of the adjacent property owner for
placement of the signs on private property. This policy does
not grant unlimited access and use of the City right-of-way.
Violations of this policy will be cause for confiscating
the signs, and excessive violations may require that the
policy be suspended for a period of time. The Building
Official shall notify the City Council in the event that the
suspension of this policy is put into effect indicating the
causes and the period of the suspension. All builders are
offered the use of this policy equally. In so doing, we ask
that you help us maintain a neat and orderly appearance
throughout all of North Richland Hills.
SECTION 6.4 SUBDIVISION/NEW DEVELOPMENT SIGNS.
(a) These signs are used for identification of a new
project, such as a subdivision, where real property is being
sold for the first time to a user, new buildings, public
projects and the like. These signs are not permanent but may
be required for a longer period of time than most temporary
signs. In no event shall there be more than one on-site sign
for a project located on property owned by the advertiser in
the same zoning district and one off-site sign to be located
in any zoning district with exception of AG and all R
districts. Such signs shall be removed at the end of one year
or completion of the project, whichever comes first. An
extension to the one year limitation may be granted by the
Building Official and a renewal fee equal to the permit fee
is paid and one of the following requirements are met:
(1) a substantial portion of the development is not yet
completed,
(2) if the development has building activity in progress,
(3) if the sign is relocated to a portion of the develop-
ment which is not offensive to the completed portions
of the development.
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
These signs shall not exceed 15 feet in height and 150
square feet in area. They shall be located at least 25 feet
behind the curb of any street, outside any visibility
triangle.
On larger vacant tracts where more than one project or
development may be advertised no two signs may be closer than
two hundred (200) feet apart.
(b) A sign permit is required for subdivision or new
development signs erected or placed in accordance with the
provisions of Section 6.4(a).
SECTION 6.5 TRADE CONSTRUCTION SIGNS.
Trade construction signs may be approved at the discretion
of the Building Official to advertise the various construc-
tion trades on any construction site. Trade construction
signs shall be removed before a certificate of occupancy is
issued. They shall be in accordance with Section 6.4.
SECTION 6.6 POLITICAL SIGNS.
Temporary, unlighted political signs (including portable or
trailer signs) supporting an announced candidate, a party or
an issue shall be allowed in any district without a sign
permit, subject to the following:
(a) Political signs shall be located only on private
property with the permission of the owner. Political
signs shall not be permitted on any public property or
right-of-way, nor on any utility, light, traffic signal
or sign poles.
(b) Political signs are permitted for a period of thirty
(30) days prior to local or county elections, sixty
(60) days prior to a state election, and ninety (90)
days prior to a national e~ection. All political signs
shall be removed not later than seven (7) days after
the election or after the termination of candidacy,
whichever occurs first.
(c) In AG and all R zoning districts, political signs shall
not have a height of more than three (3) feet above
grade. In other zoning districts, the height shall not
exceed six (6) feet above grade.
(d) In AG and all R zoning districts, political signs shall
not exceed five (5) square feet in area. In other
zoning districts, the area shall not exceed fifty (50)
square feet.
(e) In all zoning districts, political signs shall be
located no closer than ten (10) feet to the street or
curb and shall not be located to cause a safety or
traffic hazard.
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
SECTION 6.7 CIVIC AND RELIGIOUS SIGNS.
(a) Temporary signs advertising the civic or religious
events of civic and religious organizations may be
erected or placed on their property after obtaining a
permit from the BUilding Department at no cost. A
maximum of two permits may be issued at anyone time.
(b) Temporary signs advertising the civic or religious
events of civic and religious organizations may be
placed on any private property with the written
permission of the owner. Such off-site signs are
required to be permitted and subject to the provisions
Section 6.1.
(c) Signs announcing civic or religious events of wide-
spread community interest may be erected on public
property or right-of-way with special permission from
the City Council. Such signs will be permitted at no
cost by the Building Department. All signs so permitted
will be located so as not to present a traffic hazard.
SECTION 6.8 GARAGE SALE SIGNS.
Temporary, unlighted signs announcing the holding of a sale
of household possessions at a place of residence shall be
allowed in any zoning district without per.it subject to the
following restriction:
(a) Garage Sale signs shall be located on private property
only. Garage Sale signs shall not be permitted on any
public property or right-of-way, nor on any utility,
light, traffic signal or sign pole.
(b) Total sign area shall not exceed six (6) square feet.
(c) Signs shall not be posted more than five (5) days prior
to the beginning of the sale, and shall be removed
within twenty-four (24) hours following the end of the
sale.
ARTICLE 7.
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
The construction of all signs shall comply to structural
requirements of the City of North Richland Hills BUilding
Code, and also the current edition of the Uniform Building
Code adopted by the City.
The design of sign supports and structure shall be
compatible with and in harmony with the surrounding buildings
and structures.
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
M
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
ARTICLE 8.
BILLBOARDS
SECTION 8.1 APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL.
(a) No billboard may be constructed unless a sign permit
therefor has been issued with the approval of the City
Council.
(b) In making its determination, the City Council shall
consider, among other factors, whether or not issuance
of the permit.
(1) Will be materially detrimental to the public welfare:
(2) Will sUbstantially interfere with the orderly develop-
ment of the City as provided for in the Official Land
Use Plan:
(3) Will be compatible with the development of property of
other persons located in the vicinity thereof;
(4) Will comply with the provisions of this Ordinance.
(c) Applications therefor shall be filed and processed as
provided for in Article 3 of this Ordinance.
SECTION 8.2 ZONING.
A billboard may be placed only adjacent to a limited access
freeway as defined in Section 2.5, in any zoning district
except AG and all R districts.
SECTION 8.3 MAXIMUM AREA.
(a) No singlefaced billboard shall be larger than 700
square feet in area.
(b) No one face of a double-faced or V-shaped billboard
shall exceed 700 square feet In area.
SECTION 8.4 MAXIMUM HEIGHT.
The maximum height of billboards shall be fifty (50) feet
measured from the ground to the overall top. Approval for
taller billboards may be granted by the City Council in those
cases where it will reduce clutter and fit in more compatibly
with the surrounding terrain and structures. No billboard
shall be located on the roof or wall of a building.
SECTION 8.5 BILLBOARD LOCATION AND POSITION.
(a) Billboards shall be erected only on private property
and shall not project over any public property or right
-of-way. Billboards shall be located within 100 feet of
the limited access freeway boundary line.
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
(b) Billboards shall be positioned such that the primary
viewing angle is from the freeway.
SECTION 8.6 BILLBOARDS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
(a) The closest projecting point of a billboard shall not
be located closer than 100 feet from a residential
district boundary or property line.
(b) The closest projecting point of a billboard shall not
be located closer than 100 feet from the property line
of any public recreation area, public or parochial
school, public library or church.
SECTION 8.7 STRUCTURE.
(a) From the effective date of this Ordinance, all new
billboards shall be of single post construction.
(b) All billboards shall comply structurally to the City's
Building Code.
SECTION 8.8 MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BILLBOARDS.
A minimum distance of 1760 feet shall be maintained between
any two (2) billboards located on the same side of the
freeway.
SECTION 8.9 ILLUMINATION.
(a) Any illumination used on a billboard shall be of an
indirect type and shall not face toward any residential
building.
(b) No flashing or intermittent lights shall be used to
illuminate a billboard.
ARTICLE 9.
OBNOXIOUS SIGNS EXPLOITING SEX PROHIBITED
SECTION 9.1 VISUAL DEPICTION OF SEXUAL AREAS OF HUMAN FORM
PROHIBITED.
No sign or signs as defined in this Ordinance, to include
any temporary sign, which in whole or in part, depicts the
human form in such a manner that the areas of the buttocks,
or the genitals, or the pubic area, or any portion of the
female breast below the top of the nipple, are depicted as
not covered with opaque clothing shall be maintained,
erected, or placed upon or adjacent to the outside of any
bUilding where it is visible from public streets or from
adjacent buildings or premises.
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l'
I
SECTION 9.2 USE OF WORDS CONNOTATING EROTIC ENTERTAINMENT
PROHIBITED.
No sign or signs as defined in this Ordinance, to include
any temporary signs, which in whole or part advertise any
"topless," "bottomless," "naked," or words of like import,
except that the words "adult entertainment" or "adult shows"
will be permissible, shall be maintained, erected, or placed
upon or adjacent to the outside of any building where it is
visible from public streets or from adjacent bUildings or
prelRises.
SECTION 9.3 DISPLAY OF OFFENSIVE SIGNS A PUBLIC NUISANCE.
Any sign which Is in violation of Sections 9.1 and 9.2 is
declared a public nuisance.
SECTION 9.4 ABATEMENT.
(a) Any temporary sign or signs in violation of this
Article shall be abated within twenty-four (24) hours
after notice has been given in writing to abate the
sign or signs. Any sign which involves letters placed
on a marquee is considered a temporary sign for
purposes of this Article.
(b) Any sign or signs in violation of this Article which
can be covered or painted over in such a manner so the
sign will comply with this Article and which do not
require removal or mechanical or electrical alterations
of the whole or part of the sign shall be covered or
painted within seventy-two (72) hours after written
notice has been given in writing to abate the sign or
signs.
(c) Signs in violation of this Article which require
mechanical or electrical a~teration of all or part of
the sign or require the removal of part or all of the
sign in order to comply with this Article shall be
altered or removed within seven (7) days after service
of written notice to abate the sign or signs.
SECTION 9.5 NOTICE TO ABATE.
(a) The City Manager or the Building Official or one of
their designee are authorized to prepare and deliver
notice to abate any sign or signs in violation of this
Article.
(b) Notice is deemed served for the purpose of this Article
if delivered to any person who is an owner or lessee of
the premises on which the sign or signs are located or
to any officer of any corporation or any partner of a
partnership which is operating a business on the
premises on which the sign or signs are located which
violates this Article and which is responsible for the
sign or signs in violation of this Article.
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
SECTION 9.6 VIOLATION A MISDEMEANOR.
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that any person, firm or corporation
which shall violate any provision of this Ordinance shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction may be punished by
fine of not less than Fifty ($50.00) Dollars nor more than
One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dollars, and each day such violation
occurs shall be deemed a separate offense.
ARTICLE 10.
ENFORCEMENT
SECTION 10.1 ENFORCEMENT.
It shall be the duty of the Building Official to enforce
the provisions of this Ordinance. The Chief of Police and all
officers charged with the enforcement of the law shall assist
the Building Official.
SECTION 10.2 RIGHT OF ENTRY.
Upon presentation of proper credentials, the Building
Official or his duly authorized representative may enter at
reasonable times, any buildings, structure or premises in the
City to perform any duties imposed upon him by this
Ordinance.
SECTION 10.3 ABATEMENT OF NONCONFORMING SIGN.
(a) A period of ten (10) years subsequent to January 24,
1983 is hereby established for the abatement of signs
legally existing prior to said date but which signs
become nonconforming as a result of regulations
contained herein. This provision applies to signs
otherwise established. Illegally erected signs are
subject to immediate abatement.
(b) Nonconforming painted wall signs are subject, in
addition to the abatement procedures set forth, to
immediate abatement when the business occupying the
premises changes to a different business or different
owner necessitating repainting of the signs.
(c) Abatement periods established herein are subject to
appeal before the City Council.
ARTICLE 11.
SECTION 11.1 SAVINGS CLAUSE.
If any portion of this Ordinance is held to be invalid by
any Court of competent jurisdiction it shall not affect the
remaining valid portion.
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
PASSED AND APPROVED this __________ day of ___________, 1987.
~-~-~-~-~----------------~----~
Mayor
ATTEST:
---~-------------------~----~-~
Jeanette Rewis, City Sectretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
-------------~---~~------------
Attorney for City
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
D t t Administration C ., M . D 1/26/87
epar men: _ ouncl eetlng ate:
Subject: Calling City Council Election, Resolution No. 87-7 Agenda Number: GN 87-8
This resolution is calling an election to be held on April 4, 1987, for the election of
City Council Places 1, 3, 5 and 7 and the appointment of election judges.
The request for two additional polling places and the use of a machine for absentee
voting was approved by the Justice Department.
Recommendation:
Approve Resolution No 87-7.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Rf1h
I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Fmance Director
Page 1 of
1
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
RESOLUTION NO. 87-7
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, THAT:
1.
A municipal election shall be held for the election of four
Council Members to Places 1, 3, 5 and 7 on the 4th of April, 1987 between
the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
2.
The election shall be held at three polling places as follows:
a. City Hall at 7301 Northeast Loop 820 for voters residing in
Voting Precincts 3191, 3214, 3324, 3333 and 3041;
b. Branch City Hall at 6801 Glenview Drive for voters residing
in Voting Precincts 3215, 3140, 3326, and 3289; and
c. Fire Station at 8300 Starnes Road for voters residing in
Voting Precincts 3072, 3209, 3063, 3049 and 3177.
3.
Qualified candidates may file with the Mayor, in the office of
the City Secretary, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, until February 18, 1987 at 5:00 p.m., at which time filing
will close.
4.
The following persons shall serve as election officials:
Election Judge:
Assistant Judge:
Assistant Judge:
Assistant Judge:
Gary Holt
Bob Bartley
Jane Bell
Lee Anne Lamond
and such clerks as may be needed and appointed by the Election Judge.
5.
The following persons are appointed as the Absentee Ballot Board:
Chief Judge:
Member:
Member:
Gary Holt
Bob Bartley
Jane Bell
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
Resolution No. 87-7
Page 2
6.
Absentee voting shall commence March 11, 1987 and continue
through March 31, 1987. Absentee voting shall take place in the office of
the City Secretary in the City Hall. (Room 124 and City Council Chambers
shall be considered an extension of the City Secretary's office for
absentee voting.)
7.
The election shall be conducted pursuant to the laws of the State
of Texas. The City Secretary is directed to procure voting machines for
regular voting and for absentee voting, if available.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 26th day of January, 1987.
Dan Echols, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Utility
Council Meeting Date:
1-26-87
Subject: Contract Between Trinity River Authority and City of
North Richland Hills For Laboratory Service
Agenda Number:
GN 87-9
Each year we have to sign a contract with Trinity River Authority for
them to do laboratory testing and sampling for our sewer system. This
is basically the same contract as we have had in years past except for
slight changes in the laboratory fees. Some fees increased and some
decreased but overall there isn't any change. We paid $3,200 in
1986. Because of the shorter length of this contract the maximum
amount would be $3,000.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of contract between Trinity River Authority
and the City of North Rich1and Hills for laboratory sampling and tests.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number 02-11-02-4925
Sufficient Funds Available
x
~~_ R^&~
Department Head ign ture
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
R !)1/~
City Manager
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
I'
.~
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
r-
Ie
I
Trinity River Authority of Texas
Central Regional Wastewater System
December 22, 1986
Gene Riddle
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
P.o. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Dear Mr. 'Riddle:
Subject: Contract for Services
Transmitted herewith are two copies of the Trinity River Authority Contract for
Services (FY-87) for analysis of water and wastewater, industrial inspection,
and/or sampling. Effective January 13, 1987, the current contract with the
City of North R;chland Hills expires. The attached contracts are submitted for
your review and official authorization for renewal of required services. A
copy will be returned to you for your files upon completion.
The fiscal year for many of our Contracting Cities is October 1st., througn
September 30th. Due to this fact, we are requesting contracts begin on October
Ist.~ and expire on September 30th., each year to maintain an effective
program.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss this contract further, please do
not hesitate to call this office.
Sincerely,
~,~- ll{,
Patricia M. Cleveland
Manager, Technical Services
PMC/jrn
Attachments
P.O. Box 531196
Grand Prairie, Texas 75053
(81 7) Metro 263-2251
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Uti 1 i ty Co 'I M t' D t 1/26/87
Katl tl catl on of Hl rl ng of Panne 11, Kerr &. Fo~ unCI ee Ing a e:
for Negotiating with the City of Fort Worth GN 87-10
tor a Wastewater contract, Kates and Sewer Access FeesAgenda Number:
_Ubject:
I
I
The City Council has been provided a copy of the final report on the Pannell, Kerr &
Forster Rate Study that was conducted for 21 cities that are wastewater customers of the
City of Fort Worth. The rate study has revealed that the basic rates which Fort Worth
originally proposed are approximately 24 per cent higher than they should be. Fort
Worth also has a copy of this rate study and they have basically agreed with its
contents.
There are three things remalnlng to be accomplished with the City of Fort Worth as
follows: (1) Design of the sewer rates; (2) The wording of a new contract; and (3) The
negotiation of sewer access fees. These three work elements were not included in the
original agreement with Pannell, Kerr & Forster. The Mayor's Council of Tarrant County
has recommended that the 21 customer cities participate in retaining Pannell, Kerr &
Forster to assist the staff people who are negotiating with the staff of Fort Worth on
the three remaining sewer related issues. The cost of Pannell, Kerr & Forster to do
this work is $30,000 of which the City of North Richland Hills' share is 16 per cent or
$4,800. Because of the February 1, 1987 deadline for reaching a consensus on one of
these elements (sewer access fees), the City Manager authorized North Richland Hill's
participation in this study, and City Council ratification is hereby requested.
Since there are presently three sewer related issues to be resolved between Fort Worth
and the customer cities, there may be some confusion about the Pannell, Kerr & Forster
~te study and the access fees Fort Worth has asked the cities to adopt. Participation
~n the rate study was approved by the North Richland Hills City Council on March 24,
1986. Sewer access fees did not surface as an issue until the Fort Worth Water and
Wastewater Capital Cost Recovery Advisory Committee submitted their report on access
fees to the Fort Worth City Council on May 27, 1986. On June 6, 1986, the Fort Worth
City Council adopted an ordinance setting access fees. On June 18, 1986, Mayor Bolen
sent a letter to Mayor Echols asking the City of North Richland Hills to also adopt an
ordinance setting access fees.
The original rate study mentioned in paragraph one cost $12,800. When the City Council
approved participation in this study, $15,000 was appropriated but the remaining $2,200
of this appropriation lapsed September 30, 1986, therefore requiring an additional
appropriation of $4,800.
I
I
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget ~
Other ~
~e &/ 4LfJ~
Department Head Signature
I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number See Above
Sufficient Funds Available
RfIl~~
City Manager
Finance Director
Page 1 of
2
I"
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Additional Information:
All of the discussion and actions recited above deal with sewerage service issues.
The subject of the wholesale water contract, basic rates and system access fees
between Fort Worth and the customer cities remain to be addressed in the near
future. It is believed that expert assistance from a consultant accountable to
North Richland and other customer cities will be a necessity in dealing with the
water issues.
Recommendation:
Ratification of the contract modification providing for Pannel, Kerr & Forster to
assist in negotiating with the City of Fort Worth for a rate design, access fees
and wastewater contract is requested, along with approval of an appropriation of
$4,800 from Retained Earnings 02-00-00-0599 to Special Services 02-11-02-4800 to
pay this additional cost.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Administration
C ·1 M · D 1/26/87
ouncl eetlng ate:
Public Hearing - Charter Commission Recommendations A d N b GN 87-11
gen a urn er:
Council has set January 26, 1987 as a Public Hearing date on the Charter Commission
recommendations.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council call a Charter Admendment Election for the
State approved August, 1987 election date.
I
~
~
,
'Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
I_ Other
I
I
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
,.
t~1¡/~
Department Head Signature I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
,
..
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Public Works
Council Meeting Date: 1-26-87
Consideration of Authorizing Condemnat;_i.on Agenda Number:
of Property Owned by Mr. B. R. Seale, Goode, Inc. (Hank Sutton),
and Mr. W. H. Long -- Resolution No. 87-5
PU 87-6
These three properties are necessary so that the Starnes Road project can get
started. We had appraisals done on all three properties and Mr. Seale's property
was appraised at $17,000 for the part that the city was asking for. Mr. Seale's
attorney made a counter offer which is attached. As you can see, the counter
offer is asking for considerably more than the appraised value.
Goode, Inc. was appraised for $2.25 a square foot for a total of $35,700. We
made an offer to Mr. Sutton, who owns Goode, Inc., of $35,700 and we have not
received any counter offer from him at this time. Mr. Sutton owns a corner lot
at Smithfield and Starnes Road and the corner lot across the street from him
which seems to be a little bit better lot sold for $1.96 a square foot.
The appraisal on Mr. Long's property was $1.25 a square foot for a total of
$17,000. We received a response from his attorney and he said that he might
possibly consider the $17,000 but since November I have not received any
further correspondence from Mr. Long or his attorney. Mr. Long's property
if and when Starnes Road is built, would have frontage on Starnes Road. But
at the present time he does not have frontage on Starnes Road however, he
does have some frontage on Smithfield Road north of the intersection.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 87-5 authorizing condemnation of
Mr. B. R. Seale's property, Goode, Inc.'s property, and Mr. W. H. Long's property
for the purpose of constructing Starnes Road.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Avai lable
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
. Other ,~ ~$
~ A~ ~
De-partme'nt Head Signature
R 11/ ~.
, City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
~
I
RESOLUTION NO. 87-5
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North
Richland Hills, Texas, that:
1.
The City Attorney is hereby authorized to acquire
right-of-way for the Starnes Road project by eminent domain proceedings
against the following:
(a) Abstract 311, Tract 2E & 2H owned by B. R. Seale (.4486 acres)
(b) Abstract 146, Tract lD owned by Goode, Inc. (.272 acres)
(c) Abstract 146, Tract 1 owned by William Howard Long (.283 acres)
PASSED AND APPROVED this
1987.
26th day of 'Janùary'···
. . I . . . . . .
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, City Attorney
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{'
I
SIMON, ÅNISMAN, ÐOBY, WILSON & SKILLERN
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS
RICHARD U. SIMON (1907-1975)
HENRY W. SIMON (1910-1980)
P. O. BOX 17047
STEPHEN R. ALCORN
400 PROFESSIONAL BUILDING
303 WEST TENTH
(817) 335-6133
METRO 429-3245
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102-7071
November 24, 1986
Mr. Gene Riddle
City of North Richland Hills
7301 Northeast Loop 820
Fort Worth, Texas 76118
Dear Mr. Riddle,
I recently talked to Mr. Lloyd Nivens, who informed me
that a new appraisal had been done for the portion of Mr. W.
H. Long's riqht-of-way along the proposed Starnes Road. I
was instructed that if I requested he would send me a copy.
Please allow this letter to serve as a request, and ask that
a copy be sent to me. It is my understanding that
apparently the City is makinq an offer of $17,000.00, for
Mr. Long's portion of the right-af-way. We will consider
it.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
~A~/
Stephen R. ~lcorn
SRA/chd
(52615) - 10671
I .'
~
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
('
I
ji-b
Patrick J. Funiciello
January 7, 1987
Attorney AI LQ~'
City Council
City of North Richland Hills, Texas
7301 N.E. Loop 820
P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re:
PWL-0070-86
Dear Sirs:
I have been retained by Mr. B. R. Seale to represent him in the matter
above referenced.
On December 2, 1986, Director of Public Works, Gene Riddle sent Mr.
Seale a letter offering to purchase a right-of-way 6f .4496 acres
out of the two adjoining lots of Mr. Seale's homestead.
Mr. Seale is fully aware, and I have discussed with him, the right
of eminent domain. This reply is addressed to the issue of just
compensation for the "taking" of Mr. Seale's property by the City
of North Richland Hills.
For the sake of your discussions at City Council on January 13, 1987,
Mr. Seale is making the following demands as just compensation:
1. The City pay him $30,000.00 for the .4496 acre portions
of his two homestead lots; ,
2: The City pay to move the fences and the barn, and the electric
light pole; and if it is impractical to move the barn, then in that
event, pay him $3,500.00 for the barn, have it removed and move the
fences;
3. The City shall waive any assessments for streets, curbing,
gutters, sidewalks, sewers and other City services that pass over or
through the property of Mr. Seale; and
4. The City shall replace the three peach trees and one pear
tree that are presently on the right-of-way; and also the large Fruit-
less Mulberry tree.
As most of you know, Mr. Seale has lived for many years on his present
property located at 7317 Douglas Lane, and one can never be completely
reimbursed for the sentimental value of land. We feel that the offer
is reasonable and would be willing to discuss this matter at a mutually
convenient time. I shall be waiting to hear from you.
PJF/jbf
cc: Roger Line, City Mge.
Gene Riddle, Dir. Pub. Wks.
B. R. Seale
1001 W. Euless Blvd., Suite 210 · Euless, Texas 76040 · Business (817) 283-9386 . Metro (817) 267-4582
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget --1L-
e Other ,ðfL.
epartment Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
'I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Purchasing
Council Meeting Date: 1-26-87
Agenda Number: PU 87-7
Subject:
Bid award for tractor with Backhoe
On January 9, 1987 at 10:00 a.m., sealed bids were opened for a
tractor with backhoe.
A summary of the bids is listed below:
Vendor
Exceptions
Amount
Mega Equipment
Case "Equipment
Case Equipment
*Shaw Equipment
IPI Equipment
Rudy Brown
Zimmer Kabota
3
o
Alternate Bid
1
o
$ 30,783.
28,227.
25,340.
25,681.
43,960.
No Bid
No Bid
The low bid of $23,960. from IPI Equipment was for a "memo" excavator,
manufactured in Germany. This unit performed unsatisfactorly during a
demonstration attended by the Director of Support Services and the Director
of Public Works. In addition, the engine overheated while returning to the
service garage and the outriggers did not extend beyond the frame causing the
unit to be unstable.
Case Equipment bid an alternate unit at $25,340. However, this equipment
was too small and did not meet specifications.
Shaw Equipment bid $25,681. for a JCB backhoe with one minor and
acceptable exception. Presently, the city has two identical JCB backhoes
and we are very pleased with their performance and durability. Awarding
the bid to Shaw Equipment for $ 25,681., the city will realize a budget
savings of $ 4,319.
Recommendation: Approve Bid award to Shaw Equipment for a JCB Backhoe
in the amount of $25,681.
Finance Review
. Finance Director
J
Page 1 of
I~ tar 0 t e etrop ex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: """
VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS
II Request For: Back Hoe
SHAW EQUIPMENT COMPA~~ Bid Opening Date: 10:00 a.m. January 9, 1987
P. O. BOX 655687
II DALLAS, TEXAS 75265-5687 Date:
Requisition No. I
Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. January 9, 1987
City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609
II North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: Jeanette Rewis Phone: 281-0041
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
II ..
II
'T'r~"'~-- with back hop 1 JCB $25,681.00 $25.681.00
II 1400B
Refer to attached specifications
II
lie
II
II
'II
II
II
tl
II
II
Ii SUB-TOTAL $25,681.00
ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID $ 2 5 , 681 . 0 0 ~
f h M
CITY OF NORT¿ RICHLAND HILLS
(
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
"I·",
Ie
s
ITERMS Net % 10 DAYS, F.O.B. fð6~&~ NORTH
RICH LAND HI LLS: DELIVERY IN 30 or:..~ "ÕA"S FROM
RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas-
_ept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali-
I_or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its
best interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD-
ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF
NORTH RICH LAND HI LLS, TEXAS.
IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC-
CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR-
CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH-
LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI-
TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT.
COMPANY: Shaw Equipment Company
BY: Bob Fisher. General Sales Manager
PHONENUMBE~~~421-7341
SIGNATURE: .~t4~ DATE: 1/7/87
THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER
I
I.., , ' "
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
City of JXðrth Richland Hills" Texas
Page 1 of 2
SPECIFICATION FOR BACKHOE
This specification is intended to describe a tractor with backhoe and
loader with the equipment and options as listed below as a minimum
requirement.
TRACTOR :
BIDDER OFFERS
Perkins 4.236 (Diesel)
236 C.I.D./SA.E Net 70 HP @ 2200
Dry cyclonic type/replaceable elemen
. 12,000 Lbs (static)
15,500 Lbs (static)
Power Steering (Hydrostatic)
Yes
JCB 1400B CM 2WD
Engine: Diesel power 200 C.I.D. / 60 H.P. at 2200
Dual Air Cleaner : Dry
Front Axle rating: 10,000 lbs. ( static)
Rear axle rating 13,000 lbs. ( static)
Steering : Power
Throttles : Hand and Foot control
CAB:
Pressurized with heater, defogger & windshield wipers Yes
Lights: Head lights front; dual lights rear/ flashing
mounted front & rear /amber beacon mounted on top of cab. Yes
TRANSMISSION :
Torque converter
Four forward
Four reverse
Power shuttle
Yes (Fully synchronized gear box)
Yes (Constant Mesh Gears)
Yes (Constant Mesh Gears)
TIRE SIZE:
Rear 17.5L x 24 - 8 ply
Front: 116 x 16 - 8 ply
1S.4LX24XS Ply
llLX16XlO Ply
BRAKES :
Hydraulic, self adjusting, foot activated / hand - operated parking
brake Yes
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118
1-. . \~
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
City of J(8rth Richland Hills, Texas
BACKHOE:
Digging depth: SAE 14 ft. with 24 " H.D. bucket
Loading height: 10 ft.
Swing Arc 180°-:front center crant
Pump capacity: 30 gpm at 2200 rpm's
Cap & Rods : Inclosed with heater & Air filtration
LOADER:
One yard capacity bucket
Lift Face : full height
Brake out force: 7,000 lbs.
WARRANTY OFFERED:
Parts
Labor
Service Location
Number of days for delivery after receipt of order
Is bidder able to give demonstration t if required
-9W-cý ¿-i< ~
Page 2 of 2
SAE Max. 14'5" w/24" HD Bucket
10'10"
Yes
28.8 GPM at 2200 RPM'S
Yes
Yes
6000
11,000 LbjFt.
See attached certificate
covering machine warranty.
2510 Cockrell Ave., Dallas, Tx.
(So. Lamar St. & Grand Ave.)
30 Days or Sooner
Yes
(signature required )
One complete maintenance manual will be required with equipment.
~i ~¡Á-
(signature required )
)
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E, LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 187/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118
I·,.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~ ..
The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills,
on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general
conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be
attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by
* (a) Shaw Equipment Compan~omplies with all the specifications as
outlined in the city of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it
further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland
Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors
* (b) Hyd. Pump-28.8 GPM exceptions.
And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of
any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that
the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and
all proposals, or any part thereof.
Company Name
Shaw Equipment Company
By g;z9iC)1;-;-L
. Bob Fisher
Title
General Sales Manager
Date
January 7, 1987
THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION
Vendor Note:
* (a)
* (b)
Type or write in Company Name
Type or write in Number of Exceptions, if none, so state "NO"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Purchasing
Council Meeting Date: 1-26-87
Diesel Dump
Subject: Bid award to Jack Williams Chevrolet for (4) 'l'rt1C'k¡:¡ Agenda Number: PU 87-8
On January 9, 1987, at 10:00 a.m., sealed bids were opened for (3) diesel
dump trucks. A summary of the bids are:
Vendor Exceptions Unit Price Extended Price
Gateway Ford 2 $ 24,319.89 $ 72,959.67
Frontier GMC 6 21,793.50 65,380.50
Taylor GMC None Listed
Not signed by Vendor 21,742.00 65,226.00
Graff Chev. 0 21,563.00 64,689.00
Thornhill GMC 0 21,588.00 64,764.00 ~/
*Jack Williams 0 21,419.00 64,257.00
An earlier decision to delay purchase of a fourth dump truck until the
last half of the budget year should be reconsidered. If the 4th unit were
included in this package the city could realize a budget savings $14,324.00,
as a result of the low unit price.
Total amount budgeted $ 100,000.00
Total amount of award 85,676.00
Budget savings $ 14,324.00
Recommendation: Approved the bid award to the low bidder, Jack Williams Chevrolet
in the amount of $ 64,257.00. In addition, approve the fourth dump truck to this
package to derive maximum benefit of the low unit price.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Bud t
Other
. Finance Director
(3) Lease Purchase
-L-
~
~
COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I ..
t
CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS
Ie
I Star of the 'Metroplex
INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
r VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE:
I Request For: Dump Trucks
Jack Williams Chev. Inc. -
9101 Highway 80 West Bid Opening Date: 10:00 a.m. January 9, 1987
I Fort Worth, Texas 76116 Date: !
Requisition No. Î
Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. January 9, 1987 I
City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 I
I North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: Jeanette Rewis Phone: 281-0041
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
I
I "J.tO~"7"U ~11t-'T f-"t"'11t"''k- T,,7;f-n ~'lm1"\ hn~'7 1 ;114 tq.()Ö b~ 2!S'CZ 00
J J J , )
I Refer to attached specifications
I .
I --
I :
I -
I --
- - ~
I
I~ SUB-TOTAL
ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID Ib4 2. 57. OQ4
J
I TERMS '~e. {. % '"-0 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH
RICH LAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN bo - '1.0 DAYS FROM
RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas-
~ept_ reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali-
1_ or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its
best interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD-
ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF
NORTH RICH LAND HillS, TEXAS.
Fe. fM S "
Net
'-0 d a i 5
IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC-
CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR-
CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH-
LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI-
TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT.
COMPANy:'·-:rdt!t( Williams- Œhev
BY: Q~i (l M'Ie.fS .
PHONE NUM~l'~O- 0 5'00
SIGNATURE;r~.1J...IIY' DATE: I-G - g ::1----
THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER _
I"
Ie
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
GENERAL CONDITIONS
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the
following terms and conditions:
1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS
. Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot
be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for
nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent
and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for
opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read,
the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned
unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened,
and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his·
bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things
true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot
be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder.
2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals
will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities
shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive
technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the
work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS
Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions,
alterations of form, additions, or condittoI).s not called for, unauthorized
alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However. the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make
the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
.
.-
fò
4.
REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any .
or all proposals. and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation.
Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following
specific reasons:
(a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as
stated in the advertisement.
(b) Proposal containing any irregularities.
(c) Unbalanced value of any items.
(d) tVhere the bidder. any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
- -
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
Ie
I
5. DISQUALIFICATION OF -BIDDERS
Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered,
among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons:
(a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders.
(b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in
more than one proposal for the work contemplated.
(c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
(d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having
defaulted on a previous contract.
(e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience
and equipment, questionnaires, etc.
(f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland
Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work
if awarded.
6. AWARD OF CONTRACT
Award of .contract, if it be'awarded, will be made by the City of
North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the
requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within
sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said
City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations
are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders.
7. ASSIGNMENT
The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under
an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills
City Manager. Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability
in the event of default by his assignee.
8. NOTICE OF DELAYS
..;
.
....
Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying
or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential
labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in
writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with
respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for
an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a
waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which
it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give
such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an
extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay.
9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL
(This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase
description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause,
the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.)
..
I' ..
Ie
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by
a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended
to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality
and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering
"equal" products will be considered for award if such products are
clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent
to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products
referenced.
(b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an
"equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name
product referenced in the Invitation for Bids.
~
.
;.
.¡
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
GENERAL CONDITIONS
VEHICLE BID
1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive
to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland
Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production
model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the
units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature
as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name
plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every
description that is usual for standard stock models of this series.
2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type
of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these
specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item
number and fully explaining the exceptions. The City of North Richland
Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications
and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive.
Vendor Initial~O-1A/ --
3. The units shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all
equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the units
made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel.
4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed
literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the
vehicles he proposes to furnish.
5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manufacturer's Certificate of origin
and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit.
6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more
than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest.
7. All equipment covered by this bid shall be delivered from point of
assembly to the City of North Richland Hills area by railway freight or
conveyed by truck. Equipment shall not be driven or towed in whole or
part. Each invoice request for payment shall be accompanied by an
affidavit in which shall be set out that the equipment covered by this
invoice has not been driven or towed in whole or part from point of
manufacturer to the City of North Richland Hills area. Vehicles may be
driven from dealer's service center to the City of North Richland Hills
provided the distance from the service center to the City does not exceed
one hundred (100) milés.
8. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid.
'I'
.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
NEW 1987 HEAVY DUTY TRUCK WITH A DUMP BODY
This specification is intended to describe the m1n1mum requirements for
a heavy duty truck with a (5) to (7) yard steel dump.
I. TRUCK
1. Engine shall be a minimum 8.2 LV8 diesel powered.
2. Fuel Tank: Two (2)>> 50 gallon
3. Transmission: 5 speed, manual
I C~ ,000
4. Real àxle capacity : ~~O~-lb. » 2 speed
5. Rear spring capacity: 23tOOO lbs
6. Auxiliary spring multileaf
7. Front spring capacity: l2,00011bs.
8. Frong axle capacity
9. Wheel Base 149"
10. Cab to axle: 84"
11. Steering: Power
9 ,000 lbs. G ¡~ \v I<
12. Brakes: Power ( Hydraulic)
gO
13. Alternator: --óG--AMP
14. Battery : Heavy Duty 1'~~oŒŒA
15. Gauges: Oil , temp, RPM, All standard gauges ~ Vclf:
16. All grab handles to be osha regulations
17. Wheels : 20 x 7.5 cast spoke
18. Tires : 10:00 x 20, 12 Ply. Highway
19. Aircleaner : Paper element
20. Color : Silver Metallic , Dupont DT 1603
21. Hood : Tilt type preferred I r1 ~ l J d e. d
22. Unit shall be equipped with a pindal hitch.
F u (r') í she d ~J i l: 11 £30 d y
YES ~ NO
7
lÎ
,(
.
~
/
/"
V
/
./
\/ -
'"
,/
~/~
"
/
)/
1/
/'
,/
./
,/
/
(
{~
~/
/
./
V
/-
'I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
II DUMP BODY
1. Front Head: One Piece construction
2. Horizontal U Bend Reinforcement
3. Pockets for side board extensions
4. Full depth corner post
5. Cross members lace section on understructure for floor
6. Positive acting tailgate control
7. Tailgate : Box, Braced
8. Tailgate Chains: Heavy duty
9.
Metal gauges as follows:
a. Floor - 10 gauge
b. Sides - 12 gauge
c. Front Headboard - 12 gauge
d. Tailgate - 12 gauge
e. Long members - 8 gauge
f. cross members - 8 gauge
10.
Size:
Capacity 5 yard minimum, 7 yard maximum 10 ft. long and
7 ft. wide ~c
Front Head ~Q~ard : .-r9'" in Height
Tailgate : .~, in Height
Cab to Axle : 84"
Heavy Duty hoist with heavy duty actuators
11. Color:
Black
/--
- Ii. P,t»b!e
; t I
rï 0 0 ~
t1 rJY'/~~
,I, . _' ,
--! ¡--,j2t { 1 ~-,~'!~-- ---
, ._'.-----+-_..
, ' ' --------~ ", , ¡
~ '.
1",
! \
t, \
, \
"'-....1
Yes
No
,/
,/
1"/
.
/
\/
/'
\/
/
\ I
/'
V
/~
\/
,,/
....
,/
'./' /
'/
/-
, /
t/
/
V
,/
V
i//
',/
/"
,/
'v
-I
'I'
.'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i'
I
The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills,
on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general
conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be
attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by
* (a)'Tali IL WIUlavn5 complies with all the specifications as
outlined in the city of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it
further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland
Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors
* (b)
~Q
exceptions.
And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of
any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that
the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and
all proposals, or any part thereof.
Company Name
J A C K VI ILL 1/\ fvi S C }~ E V R 0 L [T, i N C.
9101 High\vay 80 West - 560 - 0500
FOR'T WORTH, TEXAS 76116.
By
~~t!rv1~1e 'j
FIe I? ,J.. IV! q ,r
Title
Date
(- q - ~7
THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED 'WITH VENDOR QUOTATION
Vendor Note:
* (a)
Type or write in Company Name
* (b)
Type or write in Number of Exceptions, if none, so state "NO"
I'
-
Ie
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{'
I
City of J(8rth Richland Hills., Texas
December 2, 1986
PURL: 0115-86
NOTICE TO BIDDERS
On November 24, 1986, a bid package was mailed to you inviting
your proposal for three (3) Heavy Duty Dump Trucks. A specification
correction is necessary in the "Truck" section of the specifications.
Please change item (8) which reads ; " Front axle capacity
9,000 lbs. " to read; " Front axle: GAWR 9,000 lbs."
If you should have any questions regarding this matter,.,please
contact me at 28l-004l,Ext. 187.
H4
n H. Whitney
rector Support Services
JHW;cr
JACK WILLIAMS CHEVROL~~, ~~JC.
9101 Highway 80 West - 5bv - UJOO
FORT WORTHl TEXAS. 7-6116.
~
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 76118
I:
Ie
I
WARRANTY COVERAGE AT A GLANCE
=- The warranty coverages on your vehicle vary as illustrated below. Please
read pages 4 through 14 fa.' complete details.
Series 40 thru 70
Warranty Llmltlltlon. Percent of
(TIme or Mileage, Dealer'. Repair Charge
Vehicle Coverage Whichever Come. First) Paid By Owner
Time Vehicle Mlle. Part. a..bor
Entire Vehicle 0-12 Unlimited No Charge No Charge
(except tires) Months
· Gas Engine
· Transmission 0-12 Unlimited No Charge No Charge
· Drive Axles Months
· Propeller Shaft
· Front Axle I-Beam
· Crossmembers
· Transfer Case 12 - 24
· Flywheel Housing Months Unlimited 50% SO%
· Clutch Housing
0-12 Unlimited No No
Months Charge Charge
Frame Rails
12-60 Unlimited 50% 50%
Months
Engine Emissions 0-60 o - SO.OOO No Charge No Charge
Months
Diesel Engine 0-24 Unlimited No Charge No Charge
Optional Equipment Months
Corrosion 0-36 Unlimited No Charge No Charge
(Rust- Through) Months
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{'
I
]
,
r
,.
u.
"
c-:
C
2
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget ~
_ Other .~ ~ V)
~~artment Head Si9~
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
I
&ubject:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1_
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Purchasing
Bid award for Water Bill Mailer
1"'0 Tntec Business Systems
Council Meeting Date: 1-26-87
Agenda Number:
PU 87-9
City Council approved the continuation of our Water Bill Mailer
at the pre-council meeting on October 27, 1986. At that time, Council
asked City staff to evaluate the "Chem Lawn " mailer design for possible
application to our system. After considerable review and analysis, staff
concluded the "Chem Lawn" mailer design to be less expensive to produce
and handle than our current mailer.
On January 12, 1987, at 10:00 a.m. sealed bids were opened for Water
Bill Mailer, Pink Late Notice and Blue Late Notice.
A summary of the bid results is as follows:
Vendor Exceptions Amount
Standard Register 1 $ 17,765.70
Wallace 0 15,038.10
Marketing Ent. 2 15,398.30
*Intec 1 12,466.50
Moore No Bid
The one exception claimed by Intec actually exceeds our requirements.
Recommendation: Award bid for Water Bill Mailer to Intec Business Systems
in the amount of $12,466.50.
Finance Review
02-20-01-2300
Acct. Number
Sufficient unds Avai lable
. Finance Director
~
City Manager
Page 1 of
"'\
1"\
I
I -Star of the Metroplex
CIrf: OF NORTH RICHLA~D HILLS
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
I
r VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE:
Intec Business Systems Request For: Billing Mailers
Bid Opening Date: 10:00 a.m. January 12, 1987
Date:
Requisition No.
Attn: Mr. John Tarver Sealed bids will be received until 10: 00 a.m. January 12, 1987
City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609
I North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: Jeanette Rewis Phone: 281-0041
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
I ./
A 80,000 each Pink past due notices 80,000 37.85 3,028.00
I B 90.000 each Blue past due notices an ('\('\('\ <Î Q~ ~.40h_c;n
~ ~
I C 160,000 each Utility Bills - water mailers 160,000 37.70 6,032.00
I e
I
I
I ~ -
I
I
. SUB-TOTAL
Il ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 12.466.50~
I
I TERMS Net % 25 DAY~ Ff·B. «¡¿TY OF NORTH
RICH LAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN - W SDAYS FROM
RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas-
a>ept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali-
Iwor to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its
best interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD-
ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS.
I
IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC-
CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR-
CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH-
LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI-
TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT.
COMPANY: Intec Business Systems, Inc.
BY: John Tarver
PHONE NUMBER: (R17) 28ð. 0724
SIGNATURE: DATE: 12/11/86
THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
j
The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills,
on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general
conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be
attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by
* (a) Intec Business complies with all the specifications as
outlined in the city of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it
further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland
Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors
* (b) one exceptions.
. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of
any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that
the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and
all proposals, or any part thereof.
Company Name
Intec Business Svsterns. Inc.
Title
Vice-President
Date
.December 11,1986
THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED· WITH VENDOR QUOTATION
Vendor Note:
* (a) Type or write in Company Name
* (b) Type or write in Number of Exceptions, if none, so state "NO"
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
('
(
.~
.
rH INTEC
d7 Business Systems, Inc.
December 12,1986
To whom it may concern:
Items A,B and C are priced in combination with a
total of 330,000 mailers to be manufactured.
These items are subject to a 10% over/underrun
according to accepted Industry Standards.
* The one exception to the specifications provided
is that the mailers will be produced as
9 1/2 X 4 2/3 instead of a 9 1/2 X 4 1/4 as
requested. All other specifications are adhered
to per your bid requirements.
See sample enclosed for the type of mailer
(not size) that will be manufactured.
7553 Pehhlc Dri\'c · Fort Worth, Tcx~s 76118 · (817) 284,0724 · (817) 284,0759
.
(?vIetra) 58<.),0018
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Purchasing
Council Meeting Date:
1/26/87
Subject:
Fire Station No. 4 Bid Proposal and Recommendation;
Phillips Swager Associates
Agenda Number:
PU 87-10
On January 14, 1987, Phillips Swager Associates opened and tabulated all bids submitted
for the construction of Fire Station No.4.
Attached is Phillips Swager Associates' recommendations and a copy of the bid
tabulation.
A summary of the bid analysis is as follows:
Phillips Swager Associates recommends bid award to Beltway Construction in the amount
of $1,273,991.
Base Bid
$1,147,777
Alternate bid 1
Alternate bid 3
Alternate bid 4
Alternate bid 5
Alternate bid 2a
* Alternate bid 2b
** Alternate bid 6
Entry Drive/Road
Site Utilities
Exterior Back Fence
Casework
Paving Brick - North Approach
Paving Brick - South Approach
Horizontal Blinds (Bid Not Acceptable)
47,920
21,000
33,340
9,613
14,341
$1,273,991
* The cost of paving brick at the rear of the building is not believed to be justified.
** Alternate bid 6, horizontal blinds, can be installed at a later date by a separate
vendor at a significantly lower price.
Budget
Original
Budget
Proposed
Contract/Budget
Base Bid Construction
$1,429,400
$1,147,777
Alternates to Base Bid
(See Bid Document)
113,670
105,214
Utility Adjustments
35,800
21,000
Total Proposed Construction Cost
$1,578,870
$1,273,991
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Bud et
Other
. Finance Director
Page
City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Budget Cont'd
Original
Budget
Proposed
Contract/Budget
Architectural Fees/
Reimburseables
$103,250
$103,250
Owner Expenses
Landscaping, Furniture, Testing,
Bid Documents, Contingency
77,000
77,000
Future Possible Change Orders
-0-
* 167,600
Total Proposed Budget
$1,759,120
$1,621,841
Funding Source
Available General Obligation Bond Funds
$1,555,000 ** $1,455,000
35,800 21,000
*** 168,320 -0-
-0- *** 145,841
$1,759,120 $1,621,841
Utility Adjustments (Utility Reserve)
1985-86 Budget Savings
Unspecified Building Funds
Total Funding Proposed
* One possible future change order which may be submitted for Council action is
modification of the main entry approach roadway.
** The bonds available as reported to the City Council on agenda item 68-113,
October 13, 1986 was in error. The correct General Obligation Bonds available per the
five year ClP plan is $1,455,000.
*** The anticipated budget savings as reported to the City Council on agenda item
GN 86-113, October 13, 1986 did not materialize. The $145,841 is available in
unspecified CIP Building Funds and is a result of budget savings on other projects and
interest earnings.
Recommendation
Approve bid award for construction of Fire Station No. 4 to Beltway Construction in the
amount of $1,273,991. It is also recommended the budget be amended as outlined above
and funds be appropriated from Utility Retained Earnings and General CIP Unspecified
Building Funds as follows:
FROM:
TO:
Utility Retained Earnings
02-00-00-0599 $21,000
Utility Adjustment-Fire Facilities
02-87-00-6700 New Account $21,000
Unspecified Bldg Funds General CIP
13-90-99-6050 $145,841
13-90-86-6150
$145,841
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
:.\;+./t'J;: l~( ;"'" ~,tX' ,\, : ~.,'~",; ,', '~'.'
)Zr·,. ,I . :i,:~,···,:"·~,h', ','í;.¡, ','
,\f" ':' /~.'<.,' ,..... ( " ." , . :' ·~t·..,'·;I.
;';;"" :ì /' '~:,."":.. H
. . '., ." ,'I ", \ . d,' :Hi ":I'~" (
<. ;.,,"'.\),1); ~:.1~~itrL~i}~, ,';.).>., 1,
'nr'~ ?~" <ii'; 1f~'\~~~V~ /.,
t' >~'~'
!~'r.i..;r:)
"~I'"~ ;'t: ..; ç
:t'
::,1."
-
;~~
'y,
~, .~.~ '<,v
~ 'f·
I,': ~.
~,,), :'~ ~,:..'" '.:~ ;;.:
:..'.' ,,: : .;: lJ:
... r .'?'\.i
.:..,,;',1. ", ~~:i
~1':,." -(:·:,i~ ?
J :. ;¡:~. "F~ >i< (k
,,~,y ~1' . ~ ".~
.~ ~ :') ',";\ ¥'
:'.; -,
;,~~
:>.l/;·, : ,¡
,;. . .:\ ': ':, I,¡ :(
;:
\ . ,
\ j
, '
';', ...'
.. ,:'¡
, .,
.~.,:, P"~' .r .' '
';, ',' i",,'.:¡""
. '::~\;~: '
:1 ':, .:' . . r-:.'..; , f ~~ :. . .
f.:'
J 't~ ¡;'1"';"/'
.. ",'.:' :;t r6~ i '. }, \"!,':
,..' ;.
I
'F, peoria, illinois
- 1 .'~'~ \ ,. I"
- ~ ""'I!!t. ~-( 'J ~
..::.. .....1'
. ......~' '. . . ,J
, -"
.....
'I'"
Ie
I
I'·
I
I
I
I
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
City of Nor~h 'Richland Hills
-2-
January 15, 1987
fa
In order to provide a IIcompletell project, Alternate Bid No.1 and
Alternate Bid No.3 must be accepted. . Fortunately, Beltway
Construction's bid on these two Alternates were quite competitive as
. compared to the other bidders. Alternate Bids No.4 and 5 were also
"quite competitive. Therefore, we strongly recommend that Alternate
. Bids No.1, 3, 4 and 5 be accepted along with the Base Bid. This
·package" equates to a contract construction cost of $1,259,650.00.
~~'"" '
~lternate Bids No. 2a and 2b provide concrete pavers at the north and
south approaches to the fire station and in the parking lot. The above
analysis indicates that Beltway Construction was not very competitive
for these two Alternate Bids in comparison with other bidders. This
ght suggest that you ~ay not be getting the best value for your
'dollar by accepting these two Alternates; but, should you decide not
,to accept these Alternates as part of Beltway Construction's contract,
there is no practical way to provide pavers at a later date or through
a separate contract. ,The decision on the pavers is a subjective one
'that must be made by you and would increase the total construction
cost, including recommended Alternates stated above, to $1,341,591.00.
Beltway Construction's Alternate Bid No.6 ;s the highest of all bidders.
This Alternate includes horizontal blinds to be installed on the inside
of nearly all exterior windows. It is our recommendation that this
, Alternate Bid not be accepted as these blinds could be installed at a
lower cost by the Owner or a separate vendor once construction is
complete.
Gentlemen, we hope that this analysis proves to be of value to you in
your decision for a total contract amount. Should we be of further
assistance, please contact this writer at your earliest convenience.
We at Phillips Swager Associates Inc. are very pleased with the bids.
We continue to enjoy our working relationship with the City of North
Richland Hills and look forward to a successful construction process.
Very truly yours,
INC.
Donald Z. White,
Vice President
DZW:jl s
FS4.11
Enclosures
~----......~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie -0
01
tC
CD
~
I 0
-i\
N
-0
01
tC
CD
I en
I
I
I
I
I
le/
1--
n :::z ::Þ :Þ ~ 5' ::x::Þ n :Þ rT1 :Þ V) :Þ -0 :Þ -0 :Þ rT1 ::Þ :D -0
0 0 r- n ~ o~ 01 ....., x~ ...I. ~ QJ....., QI ....., :=1 ~ 01 :::0
-5 · r- ^ ':J N ~ ...I. -,rt enrt rt rt rt rt < rt < rtrtrten 0
Z .þ ~ rt ...I. CD (1)(1) (1)(1) (1)(1) (1) CD CD CD ~~(1) \J
~O :ÞO~ N -, ~ -, -, , -, -,-,-, -, 0
(1)~ 3:~::> -0 o :=1 0:=1 -.:=1 =:=1 en:s en:=1 :=1 0' ~
rt rT1 r- z ~ ~ J. :::s QI -, QI OQl rtQl QI QI ~ QI ...I. :Þ
(1) 0 ZrT1:j c-+ rt '" rt ,c-+ -·rt tQ) rt QI rt -, rt 0- r-
QI ='0 QI QI n QlCD (1) CD ~(1) CD rt(1) -.(1) U)
-0'< 3:~:Þ · . CD ~ a:7 ...I. V) <
-, en rT1rT1~ en a:J OJ ,OJ rtO'. :DZO'CD OJ
0 Z 0 ~ ~ . . ~ ...I. - ...... ...... .-I. ..... ~~ o - ........ ...I.
~·Z --i:::O= ~ 0- a.. no.. CD a.. -,0.. :::0 0-
(1) CD V) rT1 Z CD CD ...I. '" en rt 0
n (1) n --i -, -, :=1Z :::z :::z :::z "CZ ;:r :::z QI:::Z
c-+ a. rT1 en en a.o 0 "0 0 -,0 0 a.0
~ ~ en . (1) . . o . :Þ · .
--0- - - :=1 QI :gN
~-iU1 C:A- C:A- 0\ U1 n.þ W g.~ ~ n
c-+ ~ ........ ........ (1) -,01 0
00 0- ~ ~ - ---- ---- ---- 0 ---- .z
-i\ " ...I. ...I. :Þ :Þ :Þ :Þ Qo- QI - ::Þ -i
:=1 :=1 0- a. a. 0- :þn:þ a. :::0
~ · . a. a. a. a.. -0 a. ;:r a. a. :Þ
- - --- --- --- Qla. a. - n
-i\ -i\ . . . . . . -,- --- . . --i
rt rt "'.. . . 0
· ...I. :::0
- - :::s V)
tC
0 n
¡ ~ ~ 0
, -:- :s OJ
~ en (1)
N W N 0\ ~ .þ .þ QI c-+ ~
m >< >< ~ ~ .þ ~ W ~ "'" .þ "'" "'" en -,c-+
0 ~ N ~ .. .. .. ~ ~ ~ .. c: ~
~ ~ .þ W 0 m nQl
~ ~ .þ 0 0 .þ N "'" -i rt'<
"'" <.TI W W 0 0 0 ~ 0 "'" CD ...I.
X 0
QI :::J
en
"
rt rT1
. 0-
~ .
~ ~
0 ?>
W ~ .þ ~ .þ m ~ ,
~ >< >< ~ ~ W 0 .þ 0\ 0\ "'" :' "'" rt
<.TI <.TI ~ 00 a a 00 ~ ;:r ~
0 0 ~ co ~ ..
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -i en
>< 0
:=1
"
rt V)
rt
C'D
~ ~ ~
~ 0
W ,
~ >< >< ~ N m ~ W W rt ~
0 N ~ N "'" W "'" 0 0 co ~ ::T
W ~ a å .. ~ å ~ ~ å .. "
. m -,
0 c..n 0 0 N "'" 0 0 0 0 -i (1)
0 0 0 0 ~ \0 0 0 ...... 0 (1) (1)
x 3
QI QI
en :::s
:Þ OJ
2. c:
~ -i\
~ -I. 0
- :::s ( ,
N ~ W N m ...... c..n W (.C oa.
CO >< >< ...... ...... W N CO ...... ~ ~ 0 U1 rt 3
<.TI 0\ 0 m m ~ ~ 00 -:- ~ å 0 -0 -i
0 0 :::s 01 ::T
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. :::JO
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '< 3
-i -0
(1) en
X 0
QI :::s
en
"
rt ( (
OQl
:::s ~
...... ~ en<
~ 0 rt ....:..
~ , -, :=1
N >< >< ...... ~ ...... m m ~ rt c:
0 W ~ "'" ~ ~ CO ...... CXh ::T n OJ
"'" m .. å å ~ å å ~ .. rtQl
0 0 m 0 ...I. A
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -i 0 (1)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1) :::J -,
X
QI
en
"
...... C"T V)
~ C'D
a.
.- c..n N m ~ ~ c..n ~ ~
W ...... W .- 0 ...... N W c..n ~ 0
w >< >< U1 '-D ~ å å å å 0 0 00 ., n
0 0 ~ C"T 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ::T ..
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..
~
-i :::J
>< n
~
" ,
,
-='~>-o
QlW,::X:
~ "'" n ~
~ .þ ;:r ,....
QI "'" - ,....
en rt Þ-4
.. 3: (1) -0
OOV)
--t:::srt
CD rt en V)
X -i\ I ~
QlOfT1:Þ
en -, :::J :;>
c-+ \C CT1
....... - :::0
<.TI'::J:::J
N -, (1) :::þ
.þ ...I. CD V)
O<,V)
(1) en 0
.. I n
-0 Þ-t
(.I) -- :::þ
CQJ-i
-.:::J CT1
rt:::JV)
CD (1)
, ~
~en Z
o (
0\
/
2
0
,
rt
::T "
Þ-t
:::0 :::0 OJ
-I. CT1 ~
n 0
'::T V')
~ -... -i
QJ:þ :Þ
:::J-i OJ
a.. ~ c::
0 r
=':2 :Þ
-i
~2 t-4
~o 0
en . ::z
~
--t
'(1)
X
QI
en
-i 0
~ :Þ
3:-i
CT1 m
~ c...
OQl
.. :::J
OC:
OQl
,
01'<
3......
. .þ
......
'-D
(X)
"'"
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
1-..
\: .~.
f':!' ,"., .,.
þ: .::-..~. .:
-0
ØJ
to
(þ
N
o
-..
N
-0
ØJ
to
(þ
V)
rt :z :Þ:ÞCD c:: ::c:Þ n :Þ fT1 :Þ C/) :Þ -0» -0» fT1»CD -0
0 or-n...... ~ o --' ØJ ~ X --' --I. ~ 01 ~ØJ-~ ~ 01 :;::0
. r- ^ ::J ~ ~ ~. , rtV)rt rt rt rtrt< rt< rtrtrtv) 0
n z ~ ~ " rt ~.(þ (þ (þ (þ (þ(þ (þ (þ (þ ro ro, (þ ro -0
0 0 :ÞO.:o N , ~ , , , , , , , ,« , 0
-à-t) 3::::=> -0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~.~ =~ V) ~ CJ) ~ ~ CD C/)
fT1 ï Z ~ ~ J. ~ ØJ' ØJ 0 ØJrtØJ ØJ ØJ '=' OJ ~. :Þ
~ C) ZiT1~ rt rt "rt, rt ~. rt 'ã)c-tQJ c-t, c-t ~ ï
ro 01 :=J C) ØJ ØJ n ØJ (þ (þ (þ ~ C'D (þ c-tC'D ~'ro C/)
c-t« ~~» · . (þ ..... CD ~. C/) <
(þ V)fT1fT13: V) CD CD, CDrtCD· CXJZOJC'D OJ
Z 0 ~ ~ . . CD ~. ~ r:;' ~ ~. --'. ~. o ~ "" ~
-0 :z -i:::o= ..... ~ (þ~ ~~ ;¡a. :;::0 ~
, (þ C/) fT1 Z (þ C'D ~. " CJ) 0
0 C'D n-i , , ~ :z :z :z :z rc:z :::r Z OJ:z
u. ~ fT1 V) CJ) 0.0 0 "0 0 , 0 0 0.0
(þ C'D ...... V) . . C'D . . O. ».
0 0.. - -0 - - - ~ ØJ :gN
rt ~ -i <.n ~ ~ m 0'10 ~ wn N ~ n
~ "" "" C'D :::r tT , 01 0
0 =:>- ..... ..... - - - - 0 - :z
-t) " ~. ~. :Þ » ~ »Qo- OJ- » -i
~ ~ a. a. a. »0 » a. :;::0
...... · . a. a. ~ c..-oa. :r c.. a. »
-- - - "';""01 c.. ~ - n
-.. -t¡ . . . . . . . . ,- . . -i
rt r+ " .. . . 0
· ~. :::0
-- -- ª C/)
:;::0
~.
...... 0 0
~ :::r ^
QJ C/)
Z ...... ~ N 0'\ ...... <.n <.n ,
N ...... ~ 0 ~ ...... ~ <.n w 0'1 ~ ~ ~
a >< >< ~ N '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 ~ V)
0 0 ~ 0 0 C/)
0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 ..~ 0
0 0 a. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
-i
><
"
rt n
...... 0
~ ~ ï
:£ V)et)
~ ~ N 0'\ <.n ~ 0 rtv)
W ...... ...... w w w ~ ~. m 0 ~ , , --'.
m >< >< '-J ~ .. .. ~ '0 -:- .. '0 c-t C ^
0 0 0 N m m ~ :::r OQJ
~ ""-J 0'1 m ""-J 0 ...... 0 .. c+,
0 a w ~ 0 0 (X) N 0 0 ....I.
-i 0
>< ~
::x:
CD QJ
...... ro ~
~ ~ Vi
-t¡
...... ~ N (X) ...... <.n ...... 0 ~
...... ...... w ::' ""-J ~ ~ (X) ...... 0'\ ,
N \.0 ...... 00 ~ ~ ~ '0 ':- ~ c.. G)
...... >< >< ~ ~ \.0 .. QJ
""-J 0'\ ""-J W ""-J ...... ...... ~ N ,
W ~ W W ""-J 0 a <.n ""-J w -i -,
>< CD
rt
rt
-0
ro
- ...... ^ »rt
~ ~ VI ro
VI
...... <.n ...... 0'1 ""-J N ~ 00
w ...... ~ N ...... N ""-J (X) 0 ...... ro OC
0'\ >< >< 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 -, ....I..,
<.n 0 0 ex:> .. QJQJ
a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rt ::J
0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 -i ro rt
>< V)
~
.
If
...... rr1
~ V)
rt
...... ~ w <.n N ....I. -0
(X) ~ <.n 5=> \.0 3 V')
I ~ 00 I 1 å QJ :Þ
(X) W rt
<.n a 0 'N 0 (þ
0 0 0 0 0
~
0......»-0
QJW':I:
..... ""-J 0 ......
~~:::rr
ØJ ""-J -I. r
VI rt ......
.. 3: (þ -0
00 V')
-i~C+
(þc-tv)C/)
X-t¡I::=
OJ 0 fT1»
v),~ø
c-t to fT1
""-J ....I. :;::0
<.n;::)~
N'(þ»
~ -. (þ U)
0<, C/)
(þV)=:>
.. I n
"'U ......
(,I).....:Þ
CDJ-i
~.~ fT1
rt~V')
C'D(þ
, ......
...... V) :z
o n
0'\
:z
0
,
c+
:::r ï1
Þ-4
:;::0 ;0 CD
....I. fT1 ......
0 C)
:::r U)
-' -i -i
OJ» »
~-i CD
c.. Þ-4 c:
a ï
~:z »
--t
..... :z ......
..... a 0
V) . :z
~
-i
C'D
X
ØJ
V)
-i 0
...... »
~--t
fT1 m
......~
ODJ
.. ::J
Oc::
OQJ
.,
QJ~
3......
. ~
......
~
ex>
""'-J
I
I Department: Purchasing
Bid award to Casco Industries Inc., for (20)
~Ubject: Bunker Fire Coats and Pants
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Council Meeting Date: 1-26-87
Agenda Number: PU 87-11
On January 22, 1987 at 10:00 a.m., sealed bids were opened for
(20) Bunker Fire Coats and Pants.
The results are listed below:
Vendor Exceptions Amount
Koehler 0 $ 6,348.20
Riggs First Line 2 5,820.00
*Casco Ind. 0 5,640.00
Recommendation: Award bid to Casco Industries for (20) Bunker Fire
Coats and Pants in the amount of $5,640.
~
Finance Review
Acct. Number01- 90-04-2200
S~!..fi;{;;{;ndS Availa. ble
- // ,
City Manager
, Finance Director
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
. Other
-Å-
epartment Head Signature
CITY
OUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I
I
I tttar of the 'Metroplex
CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS
INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM
r SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: "'
VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS
I Request For: Bunker Coats and Pants
Casco Bid Opening Date: 10:00 a.m. January 22, 1987
P.o. Box 8007 Date:
I Shreveport, La. 71148 Requisition No.
Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. January 22, 1987
City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609
I North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
ATTN: Jeanette Rewis Phone: 281-0041
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL f
I A 20-Bunker Coats Qò l'}7~ft} I '¡I tJ1J ~3~-O£oo
* Globe , model # 1776 N or equivalent ,
I * Black in color with high visibility trim.
* Name printed on back at shoulder level
Letters shall be 3" in height and l~" in
I width.
* Name and trim shall be reflexlite lime yel1o~ .
I C. 20-Bunker Pants 20 ~/7 b ;V /11tOÙ 2 ~8'ði 00
* Globe, model # 2776 N or equivalent I
* Black in color with reflexlite florescent,
I lime yellow trim. Combination of 2" and 3"
bands completely around cuffs.
* 1 pair of red suspenders with each pair of
I pants.
I BIDDER WILL HAVE REPRESENTATIVE ON SITE FOR
MEASUREMENT AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ALTERATIC lNS
It
II
It SUB-TOTAL
ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID ~ 1P~f)I()Ò~
,
I TERMS ~ % 30 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH
RICH LAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN '70-'10 DAYS FROM
RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas-
Aept. reserves the right to reje~t an~ or a~1 bids, waive for~ali'
I"or to award purchases on an .ndiv.dualltem bas.s when In Its
best interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD-
ED FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS.
I
THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
GENERAL CONDITIONS
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS
In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the
following terms and conditions:
1.
WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS
Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot
be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for
nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent
and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for
opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read,
the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned
unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been ope~ed,
and the bidder, in submitting the same,_warrants and guarantees that his ~
bid has been carefully reviewed and ~hecked and that it is in all things
true and accurate and' free of mistakes~and that such bid will not and cannot
be withdrawn becausè of any mistake committed by the bidder.
2.
CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals
will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities
shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves. the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive
technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the
work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills.
3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS
Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions,
alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized
alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North
Richland Hills reserves the right to ~aive any irregularities and to make
the award in the best interests of the 'City of North Richland Hills.
4.
REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any
or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation.
Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following
specific reasons:
(a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as
stated in the advertisement.
(b) Proposal containing any irregularities.
(c) Unbalanced value of any items.
(d) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
5. DISQUALIFICATION OF ·BIDDERS
Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered,
among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons:
(a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders.
(b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in
more than one proposal for the work contemplated.
(c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation
with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is
contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City.
(d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having
defaulted on a previous contract.
(e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience
and equipment, questionnaires, etc.
(f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland
Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work
if awarded.
6 . AWARD OF CONTRACT
Award of èontract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of
North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the
requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within
sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said
City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations
are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders.
7. ASSIGNMENT
The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under
an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills
City Mariager~ . Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability
in the event of default by his assignee.
8. NOTICE OF DELAYS
Whenever the vendor encoun~ers any difficulty which is delaying
or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential
labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in
writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with
respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for
an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a
waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which
it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give
such notice, how~ver, may be grounds for denial of any request for an
extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay.
9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL
(This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase
description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause,
the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.)
I
Ie
I
I
(a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by
a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended
to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality
and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering
"equal" products will be considered for award if such products are
clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent
to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products
referenced.
(b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an
"equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name
product referenced in the Invitation for Bids.
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
GENERAL CONDITIONS
Miscellaneous Purchase
1. Delivery shall be to the location identified on the purchase order within
the City of North Richland Hills.
2. The contract will be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications at
the price bid.
3. In the event of partial shipments or multiple deliveries, the quantities
shown on the bid are estimated quantities only. The City of North Richland
Hills reserves the right to purchase more than or less than the quantities
shown. In any event, the unit bid prices shall govern.
4. Bidder warrants that all deliveries made under the contract will be of the
type and quality specified; and the City of North Richland Hills
Purchasing Agent may reject and/or refuse any delivery which falls below
the quality specified in the specifications. The City of North Richland
Hills shall not be held to have accepted any delivery until after an
inspection of same has been made and an opportunity to exercise its right
of rejection has been afforded.
5. All manufacturer's warranties shall inure to the benefit of the City of
North Richland Hills, and replacement of defective materials shall be made
promptly upon request.
6. Failure by the contractor to make reasonable delivery as and when requested
shall entitle the Purchasing Agent to acquire quantities from alternate
sources wherever available, with the right to seek reimbursement from the
contractor for amounts, if any, paid by the City of North Richland Hills
over and above the bid price.
7. All materials delivered shall be free of any and all liens and shall upon
acceptance thereof become the property of the City of North Richland Hills,
free and clear of any materialman's, supplier's, or other type liens.
8. Regardless of the award of a contract hereunder, the City of North Richland
Hills retains the right to purchase the same or similar materials or items
from other sources should it be determined that
doing so would be in the City of North Richland Hills best interest,
based on cost and quality considerations; however, in such event,
the contractor will be given the first option of meeting or rejecting
the proposed alternate source's lower price or higher quality.
9. Acceptance by the City of North Richland Hills of any delivery shall not
relieve the contractor of any guarantee or warranty, express or implied,
nor shall it be considered an acceptance of material not in accordance with
the specifications thereby waiving the City of North
Richland Hills right to request replacement of defective material.
10. Variations from specifications may be acceptable provided such variation,
in each instance, is noted and explained on a separate document.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills,
on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general
conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be
attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by
* (a) ~ ~ complies with all the specifications as
outlined in the city of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it
further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland
Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors
* (b)
/VD
exceptions.
And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of
any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that
the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and
all proposals, or any part thereof.
Company Name
~ ~J;;,~ ~.
I
£)~
-~.~~
L~if'
?/
By
Title
Date
¡5, ;1't?
I
THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION
Vendor Note:
* (a) Type or write in Company Name
* (b) Type or write in Number of Exceptions, if none, so state "NO"
· ~' .
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~epartment: Public Works Council Meeting Date:
Subject: Community Development Block Grant Program - Harmonson Agenda Number:
Road Between Dawn Drive and Honey Lane
1-26-87
PW 87-6
The twelfth (12th) year of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program consisted
of paving and drainage improvements to Harmonson Road between Dawn Drive and Honey Lane.
The funding for the 12th year is as follows:
County (CDBG) Funds (12th year)
Excess CDBG funds from 9th year
Excess CDBG funds from 10th year
Total CDBG Funds Available
$ 72,000.00
$ 5,684.53
$ 12,774.25
$ 90,458.78
$ 7,500.00
$ 82,958.78
Less Engineering Costs
Total CDBG Funds Available for Construction
The City had committed $18,000 of funds in the 12th year application which would bring
the total funds available for construction to $100,958.78.
Bids were opened on January 9, 1987, for the project with Calvert Paving being the
recommended low bidder in the amount of $96,489.20.
It is the policy of the CDBG Program that all CDBG funds are expended first with any
additional required city funds added to complete the project.
Based on the low bid of $96,489.20 the City's originally committed funds of $18,000 has
now been reduced to $13,530.42. Inasmuch as the low bid is based on estimated quantities,
the original city participation should remain at $18,000 in the event of additional
costs incurred during construction.
Funding Source:
Sufficient funds are available in Unspecified General CIP funds and would require an
appropriation as indicated below:
From:
To:
Unspecified Projects (Construction) 13-00-99-6150 $18,000
(New Account) Harmonson-Dawn to Honey Lane 13-00-88-6150 $18,000
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council award the Harmonson Road Project, 12th year
application to Calvert Paving in the amount of $96,489.20 subject to concurrence from
the Tarrant County Commissioner Court for CDBG Funding.
Finance Review
Acct. Number See above
Sufficien unds Available
, Finance Director
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of 1
I~ ;'
~ t I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
II
'.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{'
I
,
D () t-'
/((L\CH
Pit:;
KNOWl TON:.ENGlISH-FlOWERS, INc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
January 9, 1987
Mr. Win ·Carver, Program Coordinator
Tarrant·Cou~ty Management Reserach Services
100 E. Weatherford st.
Fort Worth, Texas 76196-0134
RE: 30-319, TARRANT CO.! NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
12TH YEAR C.D.B.G. PROJECT
HA~10USON ROAD PAVING II~PVTS., PHASE I
TABULATION OF BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT NO. B-86-UC-48-0001/B86-48-20
By copy of this letter to the North Richland Hills City Council, we are requesting
that this item be placed on the January.26, 1987, Council Agenda for
cons iderat ion.
Attached is a tabulation of bids for construction of the referenced project. Bids
were received from eight (8) contractors and the three low bidders are tabulated
below:
Contractor S & 0 Water Sewer Total
Calvert Paving Corp. $84,149,.20 $8,900.00 $3,440.00 $96,489.20
Cutl er Repaving Co. 84,205.13 11,690.50 2,342.00 98,237.63
Bob More, Inc. 84,676.17 12,922.36 2,577~40 100,175.93
This ·project includes curb and gutter, asphalt paving, underground stonn drainage,
and water and sewer utility adjustments on Harmonson Road from Dawn Drive to Honey
Lane.
The total available funding for construction from the County is $82,958.88. This
amount includes the original $57,000 by the County, $5,684.63 carry-over from the
·.9th Year fund, $12,774.25 carry-over from the 10th Year fund, and an additional
$15,000. in contingency money, less $7,500 for eng'ineering fees. The City of North
Rîchland Hills' participation totals $18,000 (see attached Council Action Item
fonm dated September 8, 1986). The total available construction funding for this
project, including the City's participation of $18,000 is $100,958.88. We would
recommend that the full budget of $100,~58.88 be made available for possible
over-runs or other construction contingencies.
Cant inued ... .
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I- #
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
II
'0
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
('
I
January 9, 1987 .
Hannonson Road Bids
Page
2
We understand that the low bidder, Calvert Paving Corporation has worked
extensively throughout the Dallas-Fort Worth-Denton area for several years.
Recent projects include a parking lot in Hurst, subdivision construction in
Denton~ and other construction projects in Fort Worth and Irving. Please contact
Mr. Mike Johnson at ~817) 387-6831 for additional informatio~ concerning this
company's .Qual ifications.
I n the absence of any negat ive reports concerni ng th is contractor, we woul d
recommend Commissioner's Court award, with concurrence by the North Richland Hills
·Council and agreement for funding participation, to the low bidder, Calvert Paving
Corporation, P.O. Box 268, Denton, Texas 76202.
Pl~ase call the North Richland Hills' Assistant Public Works Director, Mr. Don
Dietrich, to confirm placement of this item on the next Council meeting agenda for
consideration of approval.
~aJ w, ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
/ '~r. Don Dietrich, Assistant Pub'l ic Works Director
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ gfhe;~tin~ ~
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
I
~
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Utility
Council Meeting Date: 1-26-87
Subject: New Water and Sewer Proiects Throughout the City
PW 87-7
Agenda Number:
A survey has been taken on needed water and sewer projects throughout
the city. Most of these projects are small short run projects that
are needed to serve existing customers. Most of the water projects
would be replacing small two inch lines. The ClP Committee has
recommended that the Council approve these projects and to
construct them as soon as it is feasible. I will list the projects
by priority and explain if and when we might be able to do these and
also list the estimated cost of each project.
Water Projects
1 - Approximately 4,500 feet of water line replacement on Kirk Lane from Rumfield
to Precinct Line. This would be replacing a two inch line with a six inch
line. The cost of this project is estimated to be $45,000.
2 - The next project is 3,500 feet of water line on Crane Road between Martin and
Amundson. This would be repJ.acing a two inch and four inch line with a
12 inch line. The estimated cost is $70,000.
3 - Installation of an eight inch water line on Precinct Line Road for
approximately 7,500 feet from Grapevine Highway to Martin. This estimated
cost is $100,000. However, we do not have full right-of-way on Precinct
Line Road at this time so this particular project will probably be held
up until we can obtain such right-of-way.
4 - The next project is 7,500 feet of 12 inch water line on Precinct Line
Road from Shady Grove Road south to the railroad. This would replace
an existing two inch water line and the estimated cost is $150,000.
At the present time we do not have all the right-of-way on Precinct
Line Road at this location and this job would need to be held up until
this right-of-way is obtained so that this water line would not be
under any future pavement.
5 - The next project is 3,500 feet of six inch w~ter line on Continental
Trail and Valley Drive replacing four inch and one and one-half inch water line.
The estimated cost is $35,000.
The ClP Committee has recommended that we proceed with project 1 and 2
at this time.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
"
Rlfl¿~
ity Manager
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sewer Projects
1 - The Daley Street lift station. This project would serve four houses in the
older part of town. Daley Street is located between Blaney and Glenview
Drive. These four houses have had a considerable amount of trouble with
their septic systems and it is becoming almost impossible for some of
them to keep raw septic from coming to the surface. The estimated cost
for this project is $18,000. This completes sewer service to everyone
in this neighborhood.
2 - Installation of approximately 1,000 feet of sewer line to serve customers
fronting on Vance Road and Cummings Drive in the 4100 Block. This is
located on the north side of Glenview. This is estimated to cost $14,000.
However, we may need to put a lift station on this project also and if
this is necessary it would increase the cost. The contingency on all
of these projects would probably cover this cost.
3 - The next project is 800 feet of sewer line in Glenview Drive from
Booth Calloway to Loop 820. This is estimated to cost approximately
$15,000. The purpose of this line is to take some of our flow from
the existing Richland Hills sewer line in Glenview. The cost of this
line may increase a slight amount in order to purchase an easement
for this line.
4 - The next project is to install 1,000 feet of relief sewer line near.
Watauga Road and Highway 377. The purpose of this line is to relieve
a line that is becoming overloaded in this area. The estimated cost
is $13,000.
5 - The next project is 1,000 feet of sewer line for Holder Estates. This
is located off Davis Blvd. and north of Little Bear Creek. The estimated
cost is $12,000.
6 - The next project is 600 feet of sewer line along Continental Trail. The
estimated cost is $8,000.
7 - The next project is to extend 2,000 feet of sewer line through Franklin
Court from the Little Bear Outfall line. The estimated cost of this
project is $30,000. However, it is not feasible to extend this line
at this time as the developers are in the process of planning a development
in this area and we should wait until their development takes place.
The total cost of all the projects is $520,000 plus 20 per cent for
engineering and contingency of $104,000 for a total of $624,000.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of these projects to be constructed as soon
as they are feasible and appropriate $624,000 for these projects.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Pt1hli~ Work~
Council Meeting Date: , -?n-R7
Subject:
Authorization for Participation in the Construction
of Holiday Lane Between Hightower and Starnes Road
PW 87-8
Agenda Number:
At the present time Birdville School District is platting property in the area of
Douglas Lane and Starnes Road. Holiday Lane will be a new street cut through
which will be on the eastern boundary of the school site. This will be a 48'
wide street in this area and will be constructed in conjunction with the
development of the school site. The school district must pay full cost for
one half of the street. However, on the east side of the street there is
residentially zoned property and that property would be eligible to have the
city participate in six feet of the width of the street.
The estimated amount of the city's participation is $15,000. This is a
thoroughfare on our thoroughfare map and it qualifies for participation
according to our subdivision ordinance.
Funding Source:
Sufficient funds are available in Unspecified General elP Streets and will
require an appropriation as indicated below:
From
To
Street & Drainage Unspecified
13-90-99-4200
$15,000
Participation Holiday Lane
13-00-88-6150 (New Acct.)
$15,000
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of participation and the appropriation of funds
in the amount of $15,000 for the construction of Holiday Lane north of Hightower
and south of Starnes Road.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other'i º
;fkj IW~
1-- nt 1< ~
Finance Review
Acct. Number See above
~ Funds Available
~~rZ~
City Manager
, Finance Director
GO
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
1
~ . ~'
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
Department:
- Council Meeting Date:
Request of B. H. & L. Joint Venture for Approval
of Temporary Construct10n on Wilson Lane
1/26/87
PW 87-9
Agenda Number:
B. H. & L. Joint Venture Development Group has holdings in the northern part of the City
of approximately 700 acres in approximately 25 parcels. This property is situated
generally from Precinct Line Road on the east to Smithfield Road on the west and between
Shady Grove Road on the north and the proposed extension of Wilson Lane on the south,
plus the Green Valley Track Site. The property is variously zoned from Single Family
Residential to Commercial.
In the North Richland Hills Thoroughfare Plan, Wilson Lane is designated as a four lane
divided Minor Arterial Thoroughfare. When complete, Wilson Lane will serve as the major
east-west access for the majority of B. H. & L's properties. The applicants recognize
the significance of Wilson Lane to the development of their property and in their long
range plans are proposing that Wilson Lane be upgraded to a six lane divided Arterial
Street. However, the applicants indicate that full development of their properties
including the completion of Wilson Lane could take as long as (10) ten years. In the
interim and in order to provide early access to some of their interior tracts,
specifically those zoned for Single Family use, B. H. & L. have proposed to the City
Council that they be allowed to construct, or have constructed by the County, a
temporary roadway which would not meet the City's construction criteria as contained in
the Subdivision Ordinance. Rather the "temporary" roadway would be of a rural county
road type and would only be wide enough for approximately one-half the proposed divided
thoroughfare. In their proposal the applicants requested that the City of North
Richland Hills assume one half the cost of the temporary road with B. H. & L providing
the remaining one-half of the materials and the County Government providing the labor
and equipment for installation.
In a memo sent to the City Council on November 13, 1986 the Staff outlined the various
positive and negative aspects of the proposal related to current Ordinance requirements.
The City Council held a work shop with representatives of B. H. & L and citizens of the
affected neighborhoods on January 9, 1987.
,
,
As noted in the Staff memo there are several issues which must be resolved concerning
this proposal. However, the need for east-west access across the City in this area is
very evident. If the normal process of development is followed Wilson Lane would be
constructed "piece-meal" and only adjacent to developing tracts. The extension of the
street from one logical point to another, i.e., from Davis to Smithfield, etc., would
not necessarily occur. The proposal by B. H. & L. would at least provide a continuous
street connection very early in the development process and would definitely be of
benefit to the existing traffic in the area.
,
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Rf{g~
Ci y Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Fmance Director
Page 1 of
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended by the Staff that the City Council consider approval of the B. H. & L.
Joint Venture proposal for constructing a temporary road along the alignment of Wilson
Lane provided a mutually agreeable resolution can be negotiated with B. H. & L that will
satisfy the following issues:
(1) That B. H. & L. Joint Venture assume all the costs of construction.
(2) That the minimum width of the proposed road be 36 feet.
(3) That the design of the proposed road satisfies all of the drainage requirements
of the Subdivision Ordinance including protection of the adjacent properties
upstream and downstream of the road.
(4) That the applicants assume maintenance responsibility for the temporary road
until such time as the permanent street is constructed.
(5) That a covenant or contract be executed with the applicants requiring that the
development of any portion of their property which is serviced by Wilson Lane,
not just adjacent to the street, will dictate that the full development of
Wilson Lane will be constructed as a condition of development in increments
which will provide street access for the portion under development.
(6) That the intersection of Wilson Lane with Davis Boulevard be approved by the
State Highway Department to conform to the design for the improvements to Davis
Boulevard.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Page 2 of 2
-I ·
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
~Ubject: City of North Richland Hills I Participation in
II Blg Bear Creek Extenslon ~roJect - ~esolutlon NO.
,
I
utility
Council Meeting Date:
1-26-87
87-8 Agenda Number: PW 87-10
The City Council approved the Trinity River Authority contract for
the Big Bear Creek Interceptor Extension Project at their January 12, 1987,
meeting.
Subsequent to Council approval, we were advised that a resolution
was required for our participation in this project.
I
,
,
I
.
I
I
I
~
I
I
~
I
I
Recommendation:
It is recommended that Resolution No. 87-8 be approved.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
aOperating Budget _
_Ot~
I ~ ~ÜU ilL;}J-
Department Head Signature
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
I
Rft~
City Manager
. Finance Director
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
1
l-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
Ie
I
. .
Trinity River Authority of Texas
Northern Region Office
3152.200'
January 16, 1987
Mr. Gene Riddle
Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Attention: Ms. Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
Dear Gene:
Subject: Big Bear Creek Interceptor Extension Project Contract
Transmitted herewith are the following documents requiring consideration
and approval in your upcoming Council meeting for the above referenced
project:
"\
1) Big Bear Creek Interceptor Extension Project Contract and
supporting Resolution (13 originals), one copy provided for
your reproducing
Action on this item is scheduled for your January 26 Council meeting.
Note that we have furnished one copy for your reproduction for distribution
to your Councilmen. It is requested that all thirteen original Resolutions
for each Contract be executed the same night as the Council meeting. (Do
not execute Contract, Resolutions only.) We will arrange to pick up all of
the original executed Documents from each of the participating Cities, sub-
mit the items for consideration and approval in our upcoming February 25,
1987 Board Meeting, and subsequently route one set of Contracts
consecutively to each City such that one set of totally executed Contracts
will be available.
If there are any questions on this matter, please call.
WAYNE K. HUNTER, Manager
Wastewater Services Planning
/pns
Transmittal
PO. Box 240
Arlington, Texas 76010
(817) 467 -4223
I CITY OF
I NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
D t t Publ ic Works C ï M t' D 1/26/87
. epar men: Sidewalks Along Smithfield ROdd Nedr~ S,rI; Lhfi-eTct- ouncl ee Ing ate:
I Subject: Elementary School Agenda Number: PW 87-11
I The Safety Committee at Smithfield Elementary School approached the CIP Committee
_requesting that sidewalks be installed on the east side of Smithfield Road from Turner
to Main Street. The Councilmembers on the CIP Committee stated that this matter would
be investigated by the staff and would be an agenda item for the next City Council
I Meeting.
III· The staff investigation indicates that approximately 2,100 lineal feet of sidewalk will
be required for this project. It was also determined that there are numerous large oak
I trees that will have to be removed, several gas meters that will require relocation and
several water meters that will either have to be adjusted or relocated. There are
I sloping driveways that will require, in addition to the normal right-of-way needed for
the sidewalk, some additional back slope easements in order to make the driveways
I conform to the sidewalks. Also, on several lots the grade of the sidewalks will be so
I deep that small retaining walls may be required in order to keep the front yards from
eroding away. The other alternative to this would be extra .back slope easements and
~ - ~::es:::;r:::i::t::et:::~tu::::s~~;mal circumstances, the cost of 2,100 feet of sidewalk
I would be $21,000; however, with the additional work required on this particular job the
estimated cost is between $25,000 and $30,000. However, the need is great, and the
I project is recommended if the affected property owners will agree to give the necessary
_right-of-way and/or easements. The Safety Committee of Smithfield Elementary School has
greed to attempt to obtain approval of the adjacent property owners. Because of the
I äisruption that will be caused to the adjacent property, it is doubtful that monetary
benefit could be proved; therefore, assessments are proposed to be waived.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
~
~ Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
'. Operating Budget
Other
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Engineer be directed to prepare the necessary right-of-
way, easement and damage waiver documents for use by the Safety Committee in obtaining
approval of this project, with the agreement that the City will fund its construction at
no cost to the adjacent property owners if all such approvals are obtained.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~~~~~ f21{/~
Department Head Signature I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1