HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1987-07-13 Agendas
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
.
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 13, 1987 - 6:00 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 Northeast Loop 820.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1. Construction of Free Right Turn
Lane on Holiday Lane at Loop 820 /
(Recommended Discussion Time - 5
Minutes)
2. Method of Board/Commission
Appointments (Councilman Davis)
(Recommended Discussion Time - 5
Minutes)
3. GN 87-59 Request of Laidlaw Waste Systems
for a Rate Increase for Garbage
Service within the City (Agenda
Item No. 13) (Recomm~nd~d~
Discussion Time - 5 Minutes)
4. GN 87-62 Appointment to Wastewater System
Advisory Committee (Agenda Item
No. 16) (Recommended Discussion
Time - 10 Minutes)
5. GN 87-61 Industrial Park Boulevard/IH 820
Improvements (Agenda Item No. 15)
(Recommended Discussion Time -
10 Minutes)
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"I·'
"¡
I
Page 2
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
6. PS 87-21 Request of Nelson E. Files for
Short Form Plat of Lot 1, Block
1, Files Addition (Located on
the southwest corner of Amundson
Road and Walter Drive) (Agenda
Item No. 11) (Recommended
Discussion Time - 5 Minutes)
7. PW 87-24 Ashmore Drive, Rogan Drive and
Lynn Terrace from Glenview Drive
to I.H. 820 Vance Road Change
Order #2 (Agenda Item No. 21)
(Recommended Discussion Time - 5
Minutes)
8. PW 87-26 Big Fossil Creek Erosion Control
Bid Tabulation (Agenda Item No.
23) (Recommended Discussion rime
- 5 Minutes)
- j
9. GN 87-64 Ordinance Approving Sales Tax on
Telecommunications, Ordinance
No. 1462 (Reconsideration of
Action Taken June 8, 1987) -
Also See Memo From Lee Maness
(Agenda Item No. 18)
(Recommended Discussion Time - 5
Minutes)
10. North Tarrant County Freeway
(Reference Letter from Mr. J.R.
Stone) (Mayor Dan Echols)
(Recommended Discussion Time -
10 Minutes)
I'
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 3
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
11. PW 87-25 Approval of Right-of-way
Acquisition for Two Tracts
Fronting on Watauga Road (Agenda
Item No. 22) (Recommended
Discussion Time - 5 Minutes)
12. GN 87-63 Amendment of Section 6.10,
Ordinance 984 (Council Rules of
Procedure) (Agenda Item No. 17)
(Recommended Discussion rime - 5
Minutes)
13. Other Items
14. *Executive Session (Suggested
Discussion Time - 10 Minutes)
a. Personnel Discussion
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the
Open Meetings law. If any action is, ..
contemplated, it will be taken in open session.
I'
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
JULY 13, 1987
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 Northeast loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda
for discussion and/or action.
NUMBER ITEM
1. Call to Order
ACTION TAKEN
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting June 22, 1987
5. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent
Agenda
6. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk
(12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 22, & 23)
7. PZ 87-12 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request çf ~e}son E.
Files to rezone Tract 2M, T.K.
Martin Survey, Abstract 1055,
from AG (Agriculture) to R-2
(Single Family Residential)
(Located on the southwest corner
of Amundson Road and Walter Drive)
8. Ordinance No. 1469
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
9. PZ 87-13 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC
HEARING - Request of American
Banc Savings Association to
rezone Lots 3A & 38 thru 9A & 98,
10AR & l08R, l1A & lIB thru 16A &
168, Block 1, and Lots lAR & BR
thru 4AR & BR, & 6AR & BR thru
10AR & BR, Block 2, Glenview Park
Addition from R-4 SD (Separate
Ownership Duplex) to R-6-T
(Townhome) (Located around Garden
Park Drive, Chapel Park Drive and
Towne Park Drive)
10. Ordinance No. 1470
11. PS 87-21 Request of Nelson E. Files for
Short Form Plat of Lot 1, Block
1, Files Addition (located on
southwest corner of A~urdson Road
and Walter Drive)
*12. PS 87-22 Request of M.F. Martin for Replat
of Lots 4R thru 7R, Block A,
Martin Oaks Addition (Located on
Ridgeway Court north of John
Autrey Road)
13. GN 87-59 Request of Laidlaw Waste Systems
for a Rate Increase for Garbage
Service within the City
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 3
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*14. GN 87-60 Bank Depository Request for
Proposal
*15. GN 87-61 Industrial Park Boulevard
Improvements
*16. GN 87-62 Appointment to Wastewater System
Advisory Committee
17. GN 87-63 Amendment of Section 6.10,
Ordinance 984 (Council Rules of
Procedure)
18. GN 87-64 Ordinance Approving Sales Tax on
Telecommunications, Ordinance No.
1462 (Reconsideration of Action
Taken June 8, 1987)
*19. PU 87-30 Bid Award to Rick Murphy Co., for
library Book Move ~nd ~Srelving
and Equipment Move in the Amount
of $10,037.06
*20. PW 87-23 Watauga Road Street and Drainage
Improvements; Reimbursement
Agreement with Mobil Pipe Line
Company
21. PW 87-24 Ashmore Drive, Rogan Drive and
Lynn Terrace from Glenview Drive
to I.H. 820 Vance Road Change
Order #2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 4
NUMBER ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
*22. PW 87-25 Approval of Right-of-way
Acquisition for Two Tracts
Fronting on Watauga Road
*23. PW 87-26 Big Fossil Creek Erosion Control
Bid Tabulation
24. Citizen Presentation
25. Adjournment
- j
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lit
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
.
OFFICE OF
CITY MANAGE R
July 8, 1987
Memo to:
From:
Subject:
City of ~orth ~ic}ùand rIills
~tar of the '-Metroplex
i
REF: CMM 169-87
Mayor & City Council
Rodger N. Line
City Manager
Construction of Free Right Turn Lane on
Holiday Lane at Loop 820
At the CIP Committee Meeting on June 23rd, 1987 Mayor Pro Tem Dick Fisher
proposed that a free right turn lane be constructed on the west side of
Holiday lane at the north service road of IH 820 to improve traffic flow
onto the west bound access road of Loop 820. The staff was directed to
prepare cost estimates and report back on the feasibility of this project.
The attached memo from Greg Dickens indicates that the project is feasible
and it is proposed that this project be undertaken promptly in view of the
significant traffic improvement that will result.
The CIP Committee gave general approval to the idea of negotiating an
agreement with Austin Paving Company to be accomplished in conjunction with
their work on Richland High School.
Since the amount of this improvement is less than $10,000.00, it can be
accomplished by administrative action. Unless the City Council directs to
the contrary, we will proceed to negotiate an agreement with Austin Paving
Company, obtain necessary approval by the State Highway Department and
notify the home owners along Holiday Lane about the work that is to be
accomplished so that unnecessary concern will not be raised. City Council
guidan~e is requested.
Respectfully sub ·tted,
/e/fd ~
Rodger N. i ne
RNL/gp
Attachment
(817) 281-0041 / 7301 N. E. LOOP 820 / P. O. BOX 18609/ NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS 76180
I ..
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
'.
City of Xrth Richland Hills~ Texas
July 8, 1987
REF: PWM-0048-87
Memo to: Rodger N. Line
City Manager
From: Gregory W. Dickens, P.E.
Asst. Director of Public Works
Subject: Engineer's Estimate of Construction Costs;
Free Right Turn Lane on Holiday Lane at Loop 820.
(North Access Road)
REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT:
Unit
Item . Description Quanity Price Amount
1. Excavation 85 CY $ 4.00/CY $ 340.00
2. Stab1ized Subgrade (8" deep) 260 SY $ 1.10/SY $ 286.00
3. Lime (8" deep) (40tl/sy) 5.2 Tons $ BO/Ton $ 416.00
4. 6" Reinf. Mono Curb 220 LF $ 2.50/LF $ 550.00
5. 6" Reinf. Concrete Pavement 232 SY $11.00/SY $2,552.00
- j
6. 4" Topsoil 14 CY $15.00/CY $ 210.00
7. Sawcut 205 LF $ 1.00/LF '$ 205~OO
Estimated Construction Costs $4,559.00
Estimated Engineering & Surveying $1,500·.00
Estimated Total $6,059.00
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118
I .. .,
... .¡
.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PWM-0048-87
Page 2
July 8, 1987
HMAC PAVEMENT:
Item
Description
1.
Excavation
2.
Stab1ized Subgrade (8" deep)
3.
Lime (8" Deep) (40tl/sy)
4.
Curb & Gutter
5.
Prime
6.
Tack
7.
4" Type "B" HMAC
8.
2" Ype "D" IDfAC
9.
4" Topsoil
10.
Sawcut
Quanity
85 CY
260 SY
5.2 Tons
220 LF
174 SY
174 SY
174 SY
174 SY
14 CY
205 LF
Unit
Price
$ 4.00/CY
$ 1.10/SY
$ 80/Ton
$12.70/LF
$ O.30/SY
$ 0.15/SY
$ 6.00/SY
$ 3.00/SY
$15.00/CY
$ 1.00/LF
Estimated Construction Costs
Estimated Engineering & Surveying Costs
Estirnated Total
Amount
$ 340.00
$ 286.00
$ 416.00
$2,794.00
$ 52.20
$ 26.10
$1,044.00
$ 522.00
$ 210.00
$ 205.00
$5,895.30
$1,500.00
$7,395.30
1-
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{'
I
City of JXðrth Richland Hills, Texas
June 30, 1987
TO: Rodger N. Line
FINM-0029-87
FROM: Lee Maness
SUBJECT: Background on Telecommunications
This memo is intended as a follow-up to the cover sheet as presented to City Council
on June 8, 1987 and to provide additional information on the telecommunication local
option sales tax.
As you are aware, the divestiture of AT&T in January 1984 had an impact on the City's
four per cent gross receipts tax (also referred to as franchise tax, street use fee,
etc.). Prior to that break-up all intrastate state telecommunication services were
subject to the franchise tax i.e., basic local exchange services, extensions,
equipment sales and rental, coin services, directory listings, and intrastate state toll
calls. Because of the divestiture, Southwestern Bell lost terminal equipment (and
income) to AT&T, which was previously part of monthly service. As new companies
entered the market, there was much controversy over which companies should be taxed,
what services and how the tax was to be paid. Tax inequity existed since only local
telephone companies were subject to state and local gross receipts tax. The long
distance carriers i.e. MC!, Sprint, AT&T, and equipment vendors were not being taxed.
The state was losing revenues and House Bil~ 1949 was the answer to reform the
antiquated state taxation of the telecommunIcations industry.
Basically, the State Legislature recognized the tax inequity and exempted basic
exchange services, and the services described above from State franchise taxes and
included those services under the state sales tax. This allowed the State to collect
on all providers of service, not just the local telephone companies.
The City's franchise tax or gross receipt tax has also been reduced by the
divestiture, in the same manner as the State tax, as described above.
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118
I, :
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
By repealing the exemption on telecommunications the City will impose City sales
on the same items that are currently taxed by the State. For clarification, those
items are consumer convenience or non-essential services such as call forwarding,
call waiting, information services, pay telephone services not provided by the
telephone company, and paging and mobile telephone services. Those services that
are not taxable are:
1. Basic (lifeline) local exchange services.
2. Interstate long-distance calls.
3. Coin-operated telephone service owned by a telephone company.
4. Telecommunications services bought for resale.
Conclusión
The tax is fair and equitable to those companies not currently subject to tax. The
impact of the local sales tax on the individual consumer will be minimal or
non-exsistant, to especially the low income citizens. Those low income families can
avoid the tax by not opting for those conveniences or non-essential items and
reducing or avoiding intrastate long distance telephone calls. The optional sales
tax will also provide additional revenue from non-property owners such as individuals
leasing residential homes, apartments, duplex dwellers, and retail/commercial spaces
rented to sole proprietors and corporate offices/business. '
-ß 7Il~
Lee Maness
(
1.
I,
Ie
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
f'
I
I
I
I
I
I
'-
I
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - JUNE 22, 1987 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL 1:,0 ORDER
Mayor Echols called the meeting to order Jüne 22, 1987, at 7:30 p.m.
Present:
Dan Echols
Dick Fisher
Marie Hinkle
Mack Garvin
Virginia Moody
Jim Ramsey
Linda Spurlock
Staff:
Rodger N. Line
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Rewis
-Rex McEntire
Lee Maness
Gene Riddle
John Whitney
Stan Gertz
Richard Royston
Richard Albin
Members of the Press
Absent:
Richard Davis
2.
ROLL CALL
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilwoman
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Attorney
Finance Director
Public Works Director
Director of $upport Services
Fire Chief
Director of Planning
City Engineer
Councilman
3.
INVOCATION
Mayor Pro Tem Fisher gave the invocation.
4.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JUNE 8, 1987
APPROVED
Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Fisher, to approve the
minutes of the June 8, 1987 meeting.
Motion carried 5-0; Councilwoman Moody abstaining due to absence from the
meeting.
I,
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
June 22, 1987
Page 2
5.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
None
6.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 19, 20,21, 22, 23 & 24)
APPROVED
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the
Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 6-0.
7.
PZ 87-3 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
REQUEST OF STANLEY PESKIND AND LAWRENCE R.
BURK TO REZONE TRACT 1A AND 1B, R.P. BARTON SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 175, AND TRACT 1A AND 1B, J. M. VANDUSEN SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1588 FROM R-7 (MULTI-FAMILY) TO
C-2 (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED NORTH OF LOOP 820
AND WEST OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE IMMEDIATELY SOUTH
AND WEST OF THE OUTLET MALL (POSTPONED AT OWNER IS
REQUEST FROM THE APRIL 13, 1987 CITY COUNCIL MEETING)
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to
speak in favor of this request to please come forward.
Mr. John Burgess, Carter & Burgess, 1100 Malcom Street, representing the
applicant, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Burgess advised he was present to ans~er any questions the Council
might have.
Councilwoman Spurlock asked if the request was approved. would the City be
obligated to give them the street that was proposed along the west
property line that would connect with the service road.
Mr. Burgess stated that the City Master Plan called for them to dedicate
the street.
Attorney McEntire advised that the question on the street would be taken
care of at the time of platting.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public
Hearing.
I·
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
···1
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
June 22, 1987
Page 3
8.
ORDINANCE NO. 1450
APPROVED
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve
Ordinance No. 1450.
Motion carried 6-0.
* 9.
PS 87-15 REQUEST OF BILL COFFEY FOR
SHORT FORM PLAT OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1,
A.G. WALKER ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF DALEY AVENUE
AND GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY)
APPROVED
*10.
PS 87-17 REQUEST OF WIllIAM AGAN, DON FORMAN,
AND PAUL K. MAR FOR REPLAT OF
LOTS A, AI, AND A2, BLOCK 21, CLEARVIEW ADDITION
APPROVED
*11.
PS 87-20 REQUEST OF NORTH HILLS JOINT VENTURE
FOR REPlAT OF lOTS 19R-1A AND 19R-1B, BLOCK 33,
HOLIDAY WEST ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF BUENOS AIRES DRIVE EAST OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE)
APPROVED
12.
SO 87-7 REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO THE SIGN ORDINANCE
- 5TH AVENUE·pINETTES
DENIED -
Mr. Richard Amoedo, General Manager, Fifth Avenue Dinettes, appeared
before the Council.
Mr. Amoedo stated his business occupied two roads and he was able to get
permission from the owner of the shopping center to have a sign on Bedford
Euless Road. Mr. Amoedo stated it was very important for him to have
another sign with the competition of Havertys across the street.
Mayor Echols asked Mr. Amoedo if he felt strongly enough about the
competition to move the present sign to the north.
Mr. Amoedo stated that would not be helpful.
Councilwoman Moody asked if there was not a sign on Bedford Euless Road
advertising the shopping center.
Mr. Amoedo replied no..
I,
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
-I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
June 22, 1987
Page 4
Councilwoman Moody asked where the second sign would be installed.
Mr. Amoedo stated the present sign faced 820 and he would put the second
sign facing Bedford Euless Road.
Councilwoman Spurlock stated she partly sided with the Mayor's suggestion
in moving the sign from the Access Road to Bedford Euless Road.
Councilwoman Spurlock stated that the business was in a good location;
that she noticed the business, not the sign.
Mr. Amoedo stated that sometimes it was very beneficial to have a second
point of attraction.
Councilwoman Hinkle stated that the other businesses that advertise on the
same sign pole with him had small signs and they had not requested a
second sign. Councilwoman Hinkle asked if these businesses were not
having a problem with people seeing them.
Mr. Amoedo stated that most of the businesses were new, the others had
gone out of business.
Mayor Pro Tem Fisher stated that Mr. Amoedo was asking for a free standing
pole sign for his business only. Mayor Pro Tem Fisher asked what was to
keep the other businesses from also asking for a free standing sign.
Mr. Amoedo stated that Mr. Royston had a letter stating that no one else
would be able to place a sign on his pole sign.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to deny SO 87-7.
Motion carried 6-0.
*13.
GN 87-57 ESTABLISHING RECO~DS MANAGEMENT PRpGRAM,
ORDINANCE NO. 1444
APPROVED
*14.
GN 87-58 CENTRAL FILING SYSTEM
APPROVED
15.
GN 87-50 DETERMINING THE NECESSITY
FOR IMPROVEMENTS ON WATAUGA ROAD,
ORDINANCE NO. 1466
APPROVED
Mayor Echols read Ordinance No. 1466, the caption of which follows:
"AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING AND
PROVIDING FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF THE FOllOWING
STREET: WATAUGA ROAD FROM RUFE SNOW DRIVE TO DAVIS BOULEVARD
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
l-
I
I
June 22, 1987
Page 5
IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS, TEXAS, FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING ITS
EXECUTION; MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING
THE INDEBTEDNESS THEREBY INCURRED; MAKING PROVISIONS FOR THE
lEVYING OF ASSESSMENTS AGAINST ABUTTING PROPERTIES AND THE
OWNERS THEREFORE FOR A PART OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS;
PROVIDING FOR METHODS OF PAYMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE
OF ASSIGNABLE CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS;
DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO FILE A NOTICE OF THE ADOPTION
OF THIS ORDINANCE WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OF TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS, DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE AND All SUBSEQUENT
PROCEEDINGS RELATIVE TO SAID STREET IMPROVEMENTS ARE AND
SHAll BE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 1105b OF VERNON'S TEXAS CIVIL
STATUTES; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROll
THIS ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE
BOOK OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE ORDINANCE
IN THE APPROPRIATE ORDINANCE RECORD OF THIS CITY; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE."
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve
Ordinance No. 1466.
Motion carried 6-0.
16.
GN 87-51 PUBLIC HEARING ON WATAUGA ROAD ASSESSMENTS
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing on the Watauga Road Assessment
Program.
Mayor Echols asked all persons wishing to testify in the case to be
sworn. Mayor Echols swore the witnesses.
Richard Albin, City Engineer, appeared as. the first witness and explained
the nature and extent of the project being a six-lane divided highway to
be constructed with curb and gutter, drainage and appurtenances between
Rufe Snow Drive and Davis Boulevard along the road known at the present
time as Watauga Road.
Rex McEntire, Attorney for the City, appeared as a second witness and
explained the procedures in connection with the hearing and ordinances
being passed this date.
Mr. McEntire then called Donald Sherwood, as a witness.
Mr. Donald Sherwood testified as to his credentials as a professional
appraiser and further testified that he had been engaged by the City to
make a determination as to whether or not the abutting property to be
assessed would be enhanced in value by the project in an amount more than
the assessment against each piece of abutting property.
In response to questions by the Attorney, the witness testified that the
value of each tract of land being assessed would be enhanced by at least
the amount of the assessment. Mr. Sherwood testified as to several
I·
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
.....
June 22, 1987
Page 6
specific tracts and gave examples of enhancement. On cross examination
by persons protesting the assessment, the witnesses testified that the
enhancement of residential property was more marginal and less clear than
the enhancement of nonresidential.
The next witness to appear was Mark Owens who testified that his name was
Mark Owens and that he owned the property at 7416 South Sandhurst.
Mr. Owens testified that he did notreceiv~his notice of the hearing and
that he had owned the property about two years.
Attorney McEntire explained that the notice for his property had gone to
the person on the tax roll who showed to be the owner of his property.
Mr. Owens testified that he had a rear yard abutting Watauga Road and that
he did not feel that his property would be enhanced in value by the
project.
The next witness was Reverend Bob lane, North Park Baptist Church.
Reverend lane's concern was the configuration of the left turn medians.
Mayor Echols suggested that he document this information, which was not
germane to this project, and get it back to the City Manager as soon as
possible.
Reverend lané also testified that he thought some predecessor in title ha~
paid all or part of this assessment years ago.
Mr. line told the witness that this matter would be researched by the City.
RECESS
Mayor Echols called a five minute recess.
BACK TO ORDER
Mayor Echols called the meeting back to order with all present as recorded.
The next witness to appear was Mr. Richard Hoar, 7436 South Sandhurst.
Mr. Hoar testified that in his opinion his property would not be enhanced
by the project. Mr. Hoar testified that it would be improper to assess
residential property.
Councilman Ramsey asked Mr. Hoar if he and his wife would be willing to
sign a covenant agreeing that his property would not have direct access to
Watauga Road when the project was completed.
Mr. Hoar stated he would be willing to do so.
The next witness to appear was Mr. Donald Grant, 7452 South Sandhurst.
Mr. Grant testified that he did not believe his property would be enhanced
in value by the project.
l-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
'-
I
I
June 22, 1987
Page 7
Mayor Echols asked Mr. Grant if he would be willing to sign the type of
covenant that Councilman Ramsey referred to earlier in the meeting.
Mr. Grant stated he would be willing to do so.
The next witness to appear was Mr. William Bartholomew, 7404 South
Sandhurst.
Mr. Bartholomew testified that he was all in favor of the road
improvements and he did not want a curb cut. Mr. Bartholomew testified he
would be willing to sign a covenant waiving direct access to Watauga Road.
The next witness to appear was Ms. Rhonda Newsome, 6313 Dorchester.
Ms. Newsome testified that she felt the project would not enhance the
value of her property but would in fact decrease its value and she asked
the Mayor to continue the Public Hearing to some other night because they
already knew of one person, Mr. Owens, who had not received the notice.
-- //
The next witness to appear was Ms. Joanne Keane, 6925 Watauga Road.
Ms. Keane testified she did not feel her property value would increase
because of the project.
Mayor Echols then asked if any other persons wished to appear. There
being none, Mayor Echols called for a motion concerning the protests.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, that the roll be
amended waiving assessments on rear residential lots providing that the
owner sign a covenant waiving direct access to Watauga Road.
Councilman Garvin made a substitute motion that the roll be amended
waiving the assessment on rear yards providing that a covenant be signed
by the owners and delaying the collection of assessments on side and front
residential until the property is sold or replatted and waiving the eight
percent interest.
Councilwoman Moody seconded the substitute motion.
Councilwoman Hinkle asked how many property owners this would involve.
Councilman Garvin stated about seven lots.
Motion carried 4-2; Councilwomen Hinkle, Moody and Spurlock, and
Councilman Garvin voting for and Mayor Pro Tem Fisher and Councilman
Ramsey voting against.
17.
GN 87-52 APPROVING AND ADOPTING ESTIMATES
FOR IMPROVEMENTS OF WATAUGA ROAD,
ORDINANCE NO. 1467
APPROVED
I·
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
l-
I
I
June 22, 1987
Page 8
Mayor Echols read Ordinance No. 1467, the caption of which follows:
"AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND ADOPTING ESTIMATES OF THE COST OF
IMPROVEMENTS AND AMOUNTS TO BE ASSESSED FOR IMPROVEMENTS ON
THE FOllOWING STREET: WATAUGA ROAD FROM RUFE SNOW DRIVE TO
DAVIS BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS, TEXAS;
FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING TO THE OWNERS OF ABUTTING
PROPERTY AND TO All OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES; DIRECTING THE
CITY SECRETARY TO GIVE NOTICE OF SUCH HEARING; AND DIRECTING
THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS-AND ENROll THIS ORDINANCE BY
COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTE BOOK OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHlAND HIllS CITY COUNCIL AND BY FILING THE COMPLETE
ORDINANCE IN THE APPROPRIATE RECORDS OF THIS CITY; PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. II
Mayor Echols then called for action on Ordinance No. 1467.
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Fisher, to approve
Ordinance No. 1467.
Motion carried 6-0.
18.
GN 87-53 CLOSING HEARING AND lEVYING ASSESSMENTS
FOR IMPROVEMENTS OF WATAUGA ROAD,
ORDINANCE NO. 1468
APPROVED
Mayor Echols read Ordinance No. 1468, the caption of which follows:
"ORDINANCE CLOSING HEARING AND lEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR A
PORTION OF THE COST OF IMPROVING A PORTION OF THE FOllOWING
STREET: WATAUGA ROAD FROM RUFE SNOW DRIVE TO DAVIS BOULEVARD
IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS, TEXAS; FIXING CHARGES
AND lIENS AGAINST THE OWNERS· THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE
COllECTION OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS AND THE ISSUANCE OF ASSIGNABLE
CERTIFICATES IN EVIDENCE THEREOF; RESERVINS UNTO THE CITY
COUNCIL THE RIGHT TO AllOW CREDITS REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF THE
RESPECTIVE ASSESSMENT TO THE EXTENT OF ANY CREDIT GRANTED;
DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO ENGROSS AND ENROll THE
ORDINANCE BY COPYING THE CAPTION OF SAME IN THE MINUTES OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS, TEXAS, AND BY
FILING THE ORDINANCE IN THE ORDINANCE RECORDS OF SAID CITY;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE."
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve
Ordinance No. 1468.
At this point Attorney McEntire explained that the rolls would be amended
to reflect the substitute motion of Councilman Garvin which was passed
prior to Ordinance No. 1467.
Mayor Echols called for a vote on Ordinance No. 1468.
I,
--
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
"
I
1
I
1
I
I
l-
I
I
June 22, 1987
Page 9
Motion carried 6-0.
After discussion by members of the Council, motion was made by
Councilwoman Moody, seconded by Councilwoman Spurlock, to reconsider the
motion and vote on Ordinance No. 1468, Item No. 18.
Motion carried 6-0.
Councilman Ramsey moved that Ordinance No._1468 be approved and that the
rolls be amended/waiving the assessment on all residential property
provided that the owner of each tract execute a covenant within 30 days
waiving right to direct access to Watauga Road except those residential
property owners with front entrances1
Councilwoman Spurlock seconded the motion.
Motion carried 6-0.
*19.
GN 87-54 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING PAYING
AGENT/REGISTRAR AGREEMENT,
RESOLUTION NO. 87-20
APPROVED
*20.
GN 87-56 CONTRACT FOR ECONOMIC DEVElOPMENT/MARKETING/
TOURISM PROGRAM WITH WORTH BLAKE AND ASSOCIATES
APPROVED
*21.
PU 87-26 REQUEST TO APPROVE PROPERTY INSURANCE BID
APPROVED
*22. "..
PU 87-27 PURCHASE OF CUES MINI-SCOUT CAMERA SYSTEM
IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,850.00
APPROVED
*23.
PU 87-28 BID AWARD TO BUSY BODY INC.
FOR 11 STATION EXERCISE MACHINE IN
THE AMOUNT OF $9,890.00
APPROVED
*24.
PU 87-29 BID AWARD TO TEL PLUS FOR A
COMPLETE PHONE SYSTEM FOR CITY FACILITIES
IN THE AMOUNT OF $143,784.00
APPROVED
I-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
~ .
June 22, 1987
Page 10
25.
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
Mr. T.W. Hendrickson, 7205 lola, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Hendrickson asked what was going to be done to lola Drive. Mr.
Hendrickson stated there were stakes in his yard and markers in the street.
Mayor Echols advised Mr. Hendrickson this was for a storm drain from the
school IS property to Calloway Branch Creek.
Mr. Albin stated the stakes that were in Mr. Hendrickson's yard were
offset stakes. Mr. Albin explained the drain would be in the street and
that his yard would not be torn up.
26.
ADJOURNMENT
--
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Fisher, to adjourn the
meeting.
Motion carried 6-0.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Planning and Development
- Council Meeting Date:
7/13/87
Subject:
Request of Nelson E. Files to Rezone Tract
I.K. MarL1n Survey, Abs~rac~ 1055, [cum AG Lv R-2
Ordinance No. 1469
PZ 87-12
Agenda Number:
This Rezoning Application is presented on the existing residential tract located on the
southwest corner of Amundson Road and Walter Drive. The subject tract is 0.9 acres in
size. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential.
The purpose for the requested rezoning is to place the existing residence in the proper
zone so that the owner may secure permits for his proposed improvements to the
residence.
RECO:MMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 87-12
requesting rezoning on Tract 2M, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from AG to R-2 be
approved.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
I Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
_ 0 er
I
I
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
Page 1 of 1
í'-
_ __. _ __J_=-_-'
__----- ~...:. :.i-~"_:_T~'!.._.~
-. '.'
.~,.t ~
R-I
( -., ..'- :
-.......;
,Þ ..-
_~:. '-.' :::. - .':. r~~ ...:--
~= .. ~»;:~<þ2~
.... - -b./. ~._--
_~ --r\'.··
->~:/\\.....// '
. ---.J
R-3
'090
I
I "
I I
, "
I '
\ .\
\ \
\\ " I - I
',', SU
\ \
\ \
\~
, \ F.P
AG
Ii
~I AG i
. I
~
n
"'. ...... "'.~/· ,~ \ ,
R-3
~,-~~\
.\
:1'
~1t91
-'"
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
~
(
(
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
May 27, 1987
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 87-12 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM AG TO R-2
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 71
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
To accelerate the zoning review process, we would recommend that a
vicinity map of the area be shown on all future zoning request
submittals.
£u~£ Wr a~~
RICHARD Y. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public V~rks
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
Zoning Review
PZ 87-12
Page
1
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
-
Page 9
PZ Minutes
June 11, 1987
Mr. Tucker made the motion to plac
the issue on the next a and then
make a formal endation to the
Cit c I after they had heard from
of the City Staff.
Manny Tricoli seconded the motion and
the motion passed 4-0.
6.
PZ 87-12
Request of Nelson E. File to rezone
Tract 2M, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract
1055, from its present classification
of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single
Family.
Chairman Bowen asked for those in
favor of this rezoning to please come-
forward.
Nelson Files of 8908 Amundson Road,
representing himself, came forward.
Mr. Files stated that he understands
that to obtain building permits to
remodel his home he must be rezoned
and then platted. He said that he
thought the rezoning would pass but
that he was not sure the platting
would.
Chairman Bowen stated that the
rezoning would be considered first.
Mr. Files Stated that the two were
tied together and that if the plàtting
~as ~ot passed then he would not need
the rezoning.
Chairman Bowen said that he understood
the problem from the Staff paperwork
in terms of platting but the two
could not be heard together.
Chairman Bowen asked if there was any
one else who wished to speak in favor
or in opposition.
There being no one else to speak.
Chairman Bowen closed the public
hearing and asked for a motion.
Mr. Tucker asked Mr. Royston if this
property, zoned AG, was left out of
the Master Plan although it was
occupied.
I
Page 10
PZ Minutes
June 11, 1987
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
PZ 87-12
APPROVED
I
7.
PS 87-21
I
1_
I
Mr. Royston stated that it was left
out of the Zoning Map and not the
Master Plan.
Mr. Tucker stated that he knew some
pockets were left and this property
was one of them.
Mr. Royston stated that this was
correct.
Chairman Bowen asked for a motion.
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve.
MS. Flippo seconded the motion and the
motion passed 4-0.
/-........
/// .
Request of Nelson E. File for Short
Form Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Files
Addition.
Chairman asked
come forward.
Mr. Nelson Files stated at he had
City Staff letters wing street
escrow, water and x inch sewer lines
for the rest 0 undson as well as
future water ines for Walter Street.
It was no economical feasible for him
to do
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
· Tucker stated that there were
times when the Subdivision Ordinances
causes a ugly situation like this. He
personally felt that it was unfair.
This was penalizing a man for wanting
to improve his property. Mr. Files
would spend more for water and sewer
than it was worth to remodel his home.
He thought that City'Council should
listen and work something out. It was
in the best interests of the City for
citizens to improve their property.
Mr. Files was a one lot subdivision.
Even if the Commission approves the
plat Mr. Files does not have to carry
through.
~' ,
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
~
ORDINANCE NO. 1469
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 87-12 the following described property shall be
rezoned from AG to R-2
ALL that certain tract or parcel of land being situated in the T.K. Martin
Survey, Abstract 1055, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and being
that same one acre tract of land conveyed to Michael Boyd Manousos and wife by
Fred Marvin Cruce and wife by Deed recorded in Volume 6493, Page 208, Deed
Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being further described by metes and bounds
as follows:
BEGINNING at a steel rod that bears West 278.0 feet from the Northwest corner of
Lot 6 of the Dawn-King Addition to Smithfield, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded
in Volume 388-M, Page 105, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas said steel rod
also being at the intersection of the West line of Walter Street and the South
line of Amundson Road;
THENCE South along said West line of Walter Street, 285.32 feet to a steel rod
for a corner being the Northeast corner of Lot 1, French Addition;
THENCE South 89 degrees 54 minutes 29 seconds West along the North line of said
Lot 1, Block 1, French Addition, 150.0 feet to a steel rod for a corner, said
steel rod also being the Southeast corner of a tract of land conveyed to Ralph
L. Gilchriest
THENCE North 0 degrees 06 minutes 10 seconds West, along the East line of said
Gi1chriest tract, 267.79 feet to a steel rod for a corner on the South line of
Amundson Road;
THENCE North 78 degrees 23 minutes 50 seconds East along said South line, 50.0
feet to a steel rod for a corner;
THENCE North 83 degrees 43 minutes 32 seconds East along said South line, 49.85
feet to a steel rod for a corner;
THENCE North 87 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East along said South line, 52.0
feet to the point of beginning and containing 0.963 acre of land, more or less
as surveyed by David C. Moak Surveyors, Inc. in the month of May, 1986.
:]
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
Ie
I
...... k
This property is located on the southwest corner of Amundson Road and Walter
Drive.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
~
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN
REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ 87-12 IS HEREBY
REZONED This Day of , 1987.
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
Department:
Council Meeting Date:
7/13/87
Subject:
Request of American Banc Savings Association to Rezone f'ë¡J d N b
en a urn er:
Lots 3A and JH through ~A and 9ti, lOAR and lOB~, IIA an
lIB through 16A and I6B, Block 1, and Lots lAR and BR through
4AR and BR, and 6AR and BR through IOAR and BR, Block 2,
Glenview Park Addition from R-4 SD to R-6T
Ordinance No. 1470
PZ 87-13
I
I
I
This Rezoning Application is presented on the existing duplex project property located
on the south side of Glenview Drive situated around Garden Park Drive, Chapel Park
Drive and Towne Park Drive. The requested rezoning is from R-4 SD Separate Ownership
Duplex to R-6-T Townhome District. The applicants are proposing to revise the zoning in
order to change the type of housing product offered in the proposed project.
I
I
I
The Staff noted to the Commission that the proposed rezoning did not cover the entire
existing subdivision. The lots not involved in the rezoning request have completed and
occupied duplex units in place. Also the Staff noted that the applicant is not
proposing to replat the existing lots. All of the lots in the current plat are in
compliance with the R-6-T District criteria.
I
The applicants have submitted representative building unit layouts and elevations which
indicate that their intent is to construct a project of "garden home" or "patio homes".
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 87-13
requesting rezoning on portions of Glenview Park Addition from R-4 SD to R-6-T be
approved.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~7
f¿11 A!~
ity Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
I
U" PD·
-.. 4
1
1
I
"
"
\
-,1..\
. \ \
1-2
o 50J
~
~
- ........ - - -- - .......
-..
~-
... ..
I:
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
(
(
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
May 27, 1987
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 87-13 REVIEY LETTER,
ZONING FROM R-4-SD TO R-6-T
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 147
Ve have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
Ye recommend all the lot and block numbers for this area be labled
on the site plan for clarity.
£Úfu~ ?or a¿Ú~
RICHARD V. ALBIN, P.E.
RVA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Hr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Yorks
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Director of Public Yorks
Hr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
Zoning Review
PZ 87-13
Page
1
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267-3367
I'
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Page 11
PZ Minutes
June 11, 1987
Mr. Royston stated that he does not
have to carry through on the platting.
The Commission could make a
recommendation to Council on wai · g
the fees.
Ms. Flippo agreed that e costs were
exorbitant and if keeps somebody
from improving eir property then it
is not the ent the Ordinance in
the firs place.
Bowen asked for a motion.
Mr. Tucker moved to approve with a
recommendation to City Council to
waive the fees in this case.
/
~
Mr. Tricoli seconded the motion and
the motion passed 4-0.
Chairman Bowen informed Mr. 'Files that
he would be allowed to speak to the
City Council on this issue.
8.
Request of American Bane Savings
Association to rezone Lots 3A & B thru
9A & B, IOAR & BR, & IIA and B thru
16A & B, Block 1, and Lots lAR & BR
thru 4AR & BR, & 6AR & BR thru IOAR &
BR, Block 2, Glenview Park Addition
from their present classification
of R-4-SD Separate Ownership Dup~ex to
R-6-T Townhouse and Garden Home
District.
PZ 87-13
Chairman Bowen asked for those wishing
to speak in favor of this zoning
request to come forward.
Jerry Cotter of Cotter, Goodwin,
Marshall, 6001 Bridge Street, Ft.
Worth, came forward. He stated that
the request for change was made for
economic reasons. Duplexes were not
moving but there is interest in Garden
Homes.
Chairman Bowen asked if there was
anyone else wishing to speak in favor
of this request.
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Page 12
PZ Minutes
June 11, 1987
Forrest Grubb, 6505 Towne Park, stated
that he was the only other property
owner in the area. He stated that
Garden Homes should have been asked
for in the first place. He felt that
the change of zoning would raise the
property value.
Ginger Williams, 6525 Harmonson Road,
said she owned 2 1/2 acres just south
of this property and was in favor of
the request but wanted to know if
there would be a fence between her
property and where they will build.
Chairman Bowen said he could not
answer that.
-::-:~-
Mr. Grubb stated that he was under
contract to buy the property and that
there would be a nice fence with each
duplex.
Chairman Bowen asked if there was
anyone else wishing to speak in
favor or in opposition.
There being no one else to speak,
Chairman Bowen closed the public
hearing and asked for a motion.
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve.
PZ 87-13
APPROVED
Mr. Trico!i seconded the motion and
the~motion passed 4-0.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:15 P. M.
Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission
Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission
.. ...
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
-,
ORDINANCE NO. 1410
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ 87-13 the following described property shall be
rezoned from R-4-SD to R-6-T
WHEREAS Emory Bellard, owner of the tract of land out of the M. Lynch Survey,
Abstract 953, Tarrant County, Texas and being a part of the 110 acre tract of
land described in Deed Recorded in Volume 29, Page 441, Deed Records, Tarrant
County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as
follows;
BEGINNING at an iron rod being a deed call of 844.0 feet West of the Northeast
corner of said 110 acre tract and being in the South right-of-way line of
Glenview Drive;
THENCE South 00 degrees 24 minutes 46 seconds East, 578.99 feet to an iron rod;
THENCE South 89 degrees 43 minutes 35 seconds West, 540.4 feet to an iron rod
for a corner;
THENCE North 00 degrees 21 minutes 45 seconds West, 581.47 feet to an iron rod
in the South right-of-way line of Glenview Drive for a corner;
THENCE East, 539.9' feet along said Glenview Drive right-of-way line to the
point of beginning and containing 7.19 acres of land.
l-
Ie
I
I
I
I',
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
-I
I
I
Ie
I
I
This property is located on south side of Glenview Drive situated around Garden
Park Drive, Chapel Park Drive and Towne Park Drive.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
11th Day of June, 1987.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN -
REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ 87-12 IS HEREBY
REZONED This Day of , 1987.
~.~.c_~
c-~
SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONIN COMMISSION
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
¿
CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
'.'...""X-'"''~''' ;'¡"!þ"/'. ·'.;~",;¡>·.'·f¡·,;,~.,,";J,'·" ";'<'~.''iJ''~¡~·h;t!hZ{~tit':;;j¡I:1:1Í!!ji·'' ".,,~ 'éo'!''''';; - '-".c'~,'" r-·".. ;..,<,;'I-..r;¡.tf',':" "-'''.. 7'.' -"
~--, ~ <f ~:':~'-'" '" ~-:<.;' ~:.: .;ç.':'·~Y;":~-f' :í-·~ >:' '~.'è·-i&:?·;:~~~-:~"':-:·-,~~:~;~:~
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
7/13/87
_ Council Meeting Date:
Request of Nelson E. Files for Short Form Plat
of Lot 1, Block 1, Files Addition
PS 87-21
Agenda Number:
This Short Form Plat Application is presented for consideration of Lot 1, Block 1, Files
Addition. The tract is located on the southwest corner of Amundson Road and Walter
Drive. The property involved is the same tract contained in Zoning Application PZ 87-12
also in this agenda. The applicants are presenting the proposed plat to identify their
tract by lot and block to meet the requirement of the Subdivision Ordinance so that the
residence on the property may be improved.
The Staff comments noted that neither Amundson Road nor Walter Drive are currently
improved to City standards. Amundson Road is classified as a four lane Collector Street
requiring a total of 68 feet of right of way. The proposed plat does indicate the
dedication of additional right of way on Amundson Road which should provide the needed
width. The existing right of way on Walter Drive is sufficient. The Staff also noted
that the applicant should be required to provide escrow funds against the future --
construction of both streets. The applicant has objected to the requirement of the
payment of the escrow.
The Staff also noted that the property is not currently served by sewer service and the
water main which provides water service is substandard in size. The Staff proposed that
the applicant be required to extend the needed sewer main to his property to provide
minimum service and that the applicant be required to enter into an agreement to
participate in the future upgrading of the water main. The applicant has requested that
he be allowed to petition the City Council for relief from both the street escrow
~assessments and the requirements to construct or participate in the improvements to the
~water and sewer service. His contention is that the current service is sufficient for
the existing residence and the proposed improvements.
The applicant has indicated that he will request a total waiver of the noted escrow
requirements. The Staff would suggest that rather than a total release of the
requirements that the applicant be allowed to enter into a covenant for future voluntary
assessment of the costs of the improvements to -the streets and the future expansion of
the required water main. The sewer mai~ ex~~nsion should be required to be constructed.
The Staff has estimated that the total cost of the sewer main should be less than
$1800.00 and would be accessible to the adjacent property owners who could also
participate in the construction costs as they make use of the facilities. The following
values are established by the Ordinance for the costs of the proposed improvements which
the Staff is suggesting be included in the covenant agreement.
Amundson Road
Walter Street
Water Mains
TOTAL
151.85 ft @ $58.51/ft.
285.32 ft @ $45.72/ft.
437.17 ft @ $5.50/ft.
$ 8884.74
$13044.83
$ 2404.44
$24334.01
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
~ Operati Budget
~Ot r
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. Finance Director
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
2
·' . ,.,." _, ~ . ;.y, ,. .....~ ".c'~,.,.'r'~~;<""}\'.'"'''''cJ;.<''}'<,~ ''7i~;'~''·'··:'"'' '''·'v''''··.··'''·';'P';<,i'o. ,. '/tr··· ';"\...N, '~"f' ;:..';1. ,<" \~' 'C.,'." .;::,;,,,,., ·'<:·~S'·_'·'··
cl·.
\¡il
,:!I
I
,>il
t
',1
I~
RECOMMENDATION:
the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Short Form Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Files
Addition with the further recommendation that the City Council give consideration to
the waiving of the assessments noted for the streets and utilities on the plat.
.."'....,....-...'.....'.....;.········':····.1·· ...
G' .
;,.>~.·I.·,·.·.
~, ,
'I
>~I
'c·.··,.·.·I·
~.~... .
t(~.·.:I··.· ...
~ -0 ,_'. _:_ _. .
>.1
,>1
;~;'¡I
. tl
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Page 2 of 2
g7-
" ·'t rr-- -;--=-
R-3
1090
I
/
I
I "
, /
, ~
\\
\ ,
, ,
\ ,
\ "
, ,
\ \
\ -rF.F?
, \
. .
,./"', - ~ .. \
AG
1-1
SU
n
.."..,....,...". ............',
R-3
\
... , ... .
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
(
(
June 3, 1987
TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM:
Nelson E. Files
8908 Amundson Drive
N. Richland Hills, TX 76180
RE: PS 87-21; Files Addition
Lot 1, Block 1
PWM-0039-87
I have reviewed the Assistant Director of Public Works/
utilities comments with Owen D. Long of Owen D. Long &
Assoc i a tes, Inc. In thi s ma t ter economi cs is of pr ime
concern, consequently it was my decision to answer the
points in contention and not Mr. Long. Items 1 thru 5 are
changes in the submitted plats and maps and will be
complied by with no reservation at the time of City
Council Approval (Again, economics is of prime concern
wi th regards to expense of changes 1 thru 5). Items 6
thru 9 are of grea t concern to" me and are not wi thin my
capabilities at this time and I would appreciate the
opportunity to plead my case before the Planning & Zoning
Commission as well as the City Council.
/Æ~età
Nelson E. Files
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1_
I~
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
( (
City of J(örth Richland Hills, Texas
May 28, 1987
REF:
PWM-0039-B7
Memo to:
Planning & Zoning Commission
From:
Gregory W. Dickens, P.E
Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities
Subject:
PS 87-21; FILES ADDITION
Lot 1, Block 1
Final Plat & Plans
We have reviewed the referenced material and offer the following comments.
1. Show zoning for said Lot 1 on plat.
2. Show dimensions from centerline of Walter Street to the northeast and
southeast corners of said Lot 1 in order verify existing right-of-way is
adequate.
3. Draw arrow from "RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION" note for Amundson Road to the
area it is specifying.
4. The name '''Monousos'' in the title of the plat is spelled "Manousos" in
the metes and bounds description. Please correct whichever is misspelled.
5. Provide engineer's certification on ~heet 3 verifying the accuracy of
topography, drainage study, and delineation of drainage areas.
6. Street escrow on Amundson Road will be due at a rate of $58.51 for
the 151.85 feet of frontage.
7 . Street escrow on Walter Street will be due at a rate of $45.72 for
the 285.32 feet of frontage.
B. Provide engineering plans and construct 6" sanitary sewer from existing
sewer at southeast quadrant of Amundson Road and Walter Street intersection
west up Amundson Road across to a point adjacent to your northwest property
corner.
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 76118
I
Ie
I
I
I /
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PS 87-21 (can't)
(
Ma"[- '>8, 1987
Pa ._ 2
9. If additional water service for this lot is requested now or in the
future, then the 2" water line on the west side of Walter Street adjacent
to this property will need to be replaced with a 6" water line. This
will require engineering plans for and construction of the necessary
improvements.
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning
I Page 10
PZ Minutes
June 11, 1987
_
I
I
I
I
I
7. PS 87-21
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Mr. Royston stated that it was left
out of the Zoning Map and not t
Master Plan.
Mr. Tucker state at he knew some
pockets wer ft and this property
was one them.
stated that this was
Chairman Bowen asked for a motion.
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve.
Ms. Flippo seconded the motion and the /
motion passed 4-0.
Request of Nelson E. File for Short
Form Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Files
Addition.
Chairman asked for those in favor to
come forward.
Mr. Nelson Files stated that he had
City Staff letters wanting street
escrow, water and six inch sewer lines
for the rest of Amundson as well as
future water lines for Walter Street.
It was not economical feasible for him
to do this.
Mr. Tucker stated that there were
times when the Subdivision Ordinances
causes a ugly situation like this. He
personally felt that it was unfair.
This was penalizing a man for wanting
to improve his property. Mr. Files
would spend more for water and sewer
than it was worth to remodel his home.
He thought that City' Council should
listen and work something out. It was
in the best interests of the City for
citizens to improve their property.
Mr. Files was a one lot subdivision.
Even if the Commission approves the
plat Mr. Files does not have to carry
through.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 11
PZ Minutes
June 11, 1987
PS 87-21
APPROVED
8. PZ 87-13
Mr. Royston stated that he does not
have to carry through on the platting.
The Commission could make a
recommendation to Council on waiving
the fees.
Ms. Flippo agreed that the costs were
exorbitant and if it keeps somebody
from improving their property then it
is not the intent of the Ordinance in
the first place.
Chairman Bowen asked for a motion.
Mr. Tucker moved to approve with a
recommendation to City Council to
waive the fees in this case.
,/-->.
/,,,/"
- ",/
Mr. Tricoli seconded the motion and
the motion passed 4-0.
Chairman Bowen informed Mr. Files that
he would be allowed to speak to the
City Council on this issue.
Request of American Banc Savings
Association to rezone Lots 3A & B thr
9A & B, lOAR & BR, & IIA and B thr
I6A & B, Block 1, and Lots lAR R
thru 4AR & BR, & 6AR & BR t 10AR &
BR, Block 2, Glenview Pa Addition
from their present c sification
of R-4-SD Separat ership Duplex to
R-6-T Townhous and Garden Home .
~District.
Cha an Bowen asked for those wishing
speak in favor of this zoning
request to come forward.
Jerry Cotter of Cotter, Goodwin,
Marshall, 6001 Bridge Street, Ft.
Worth, came forward. He stated that
the request for change was made for
economic reasons. Duplexes were not
moving but there is interest in Garden
Homes.
Chairman Bowen asked if there was
anyone else wishing to speak in favor
of this request.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development 7/13/87
.epartment: _ Council Meeting Date:
SUbject: Request of M.F. Martin for Replat of Lots 4R PS 87-22
through / K, 1:Sl.oCk A, M.artJ.n uaks Addit:ion Agenda Number:
This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lots 4R through 7R, Block A,
Martin Oaks Addition. The property is located on Ridgeway Court north of John Autrey
Road. The purpose for the proposed plat is to realign the existing lot lines slightly
to create lot sizes to fit specific house plans which the owners are proposing to build.
In addition, the applicants are requesting that the existing 7.5 foot easement along the
north line of the subdivision be reduced to the standard 5.0 foot easement. The
applicants have made direct contact with the various franchise utility companies and all
have agreed to the modification of the easement. The City Staff has also reviewed the
proposed change in the easement and has no objection to the change. It is assumed that
the adjacent vacant property north of the subject property when developed will also
provide a 5.0 foot easement which will ultimately provide the normal 10.0 foot rear yard
easement.
The proposed reV1S10ns to the existing lots do not require modification of any of the
existing public facilities and the revised lots are in compliance with the size and area
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore the Staff had no specific comments
requiring correction by the applicant.
RECOMMENDATION:
4IÞthe Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Replat of Lots 4R thru 7R, Block A,
Martin Oaks Addition. as submitted.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
- Operating Budget
·Oth
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Frnance Director
Page 1 of 1
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Page 2
p & Z Minutes
June 25, 1987
2.
PS 87-22
PS 87-22
APPROVED
ADJOURNMENT
(
(,
Request of M. F. Martin for Replat of
Lots 4R thru 7R, Block A, Martin Oaks
Addition.
Mr. Tricoli made the motion to approve
PS 87-22. This motion was seconded by
Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0.
The meeting adjourned at 7:35 P. M.
Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission
Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission
I
Ie
David C. Moak, R.P.S.
I President
David Myers, R.P.S.
Associate/General Manager
I
I
I June 15, 1987
I Ci ty of North Richland Hills
P.O. Box 13305
I North Richland Hills, Texas
(~':)-1 (
'I· ,.;/ ì t>;'~L.
David c. ~-ºak Surveyors, Inc.
Registered Public Surveyors
\ . \ ./ ..- /' I
\\ \ //' /1
\~" '\ I //
"~-~'~:::.:.:=:::..;:~:': .~
76118
I TO WHOM IT MAY CONCEP.N:
· Subdivisions
· Loan Surveys
· Topography
· Construction Layout
· Acreage
14It have this date added a 5.0 foot utility easement across the rear property line
of proposed Lots 5R and 6R, Block A, Martin Oaks Subdivision, North Richland Hills,
Tarrant County, Texas.
I
I Sincerely,
I~~~
I Deborah L. Turner
Executive Assista~t to
David C. Moak
I
I dt
Ie
I
I
105-B Bedford Rd. · Bedford, Texas 76021 · Metro 268-2211 . (817) 282-0401
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
(
G,
TE~rECTRIC ~RVICE
CIM'AIIY
June 4, 1987
Ri chard Royston
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
Fort Worth, Texas 76118
Re: Dedicated 7.5 foot wide easement along the
north property line of Lots 5 & 6, Block A,
Martin Oaks Addition - Recorded in Volume
388-198, Page 88, Plat Records for Tarrant
County, Texas
Dear Mr. Royston:
T. U. Electric has no objections to the 7.5 foot wide easement
bei ng reduced to a five foot wi de easement on the above descri bed
Lots 5 and 6, Block A , Martin Oaks Addition.
If you have any questions please call.
Si ncere ly,
~-?It ~
Gaylon M. Hicks
Senior Right-af-Way Agent
cac
cc: M. F. Martin
Yolanda Radîquez
P. o. BOX 970 · FOR TWO R T H , T E X A S 76 1 0 1 - 09 70 . TEL E P H 0 N E (8 1 7) 336 -9 4 1 1
A DIVISION OF TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Public Works
Council Meeting Date: 7-13-87
a Rate Increase
Agenda Number: GN 87-59
The last rate change for garbage service was May 1, 1985. At that time, we
signed a new 10 year franchise with Laidlaw Waste Systems and it stated
that they could not ask for a rate increase until two years had passed since
their last rate change.
Denny Marchetti, who is the manager for Laidlaw Waste Systems, in May of this
year, had requested a 10% increase in all rates. After further review their
request was reduced to 6% increase in all rates. In negotiating with
Mr. Marchetti we have reduced the request for domestic service to 4~% and
6% increase on the commercial service. In comparing this rate with other
cities, we now have the lowest rate of any cities served by Laidlaw in this
area. The Public Works Director has reviewed Laidlaw's financial statement
and is satisfied that a rate increase is justified.
I feel that the final negotiated rates are reasonable and if you look at the
schedule for customer calls or misses, the percentages are very, very low.
I feel that the quality of garbage service in the City of North Richland Hills
at this time is excellant.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends to approve the rates as shown on the letter dated June 24, 1987,
from Laidlaw Waste Systems and the rate schedule for commercial pickup, effective
August 1, 1987.
. -
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
'Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
., Other
I &Y\ ~ 'Q~Q~LQA_,
T Department Head Signature
I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
~ance Director
Page 1 of
1
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
'Yj
ØØ8J1JØØØ
LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS INC.
June 24, 1 Cß7
Gene Riddle - Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills Texas
P.O. Eox 18£œ
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TI. 76100
IÆm- Gene:
In reference to our meeting of Jtme 23, 1Cß7 after negotiations of a proposed price
increase, the following is what we have agreed upon which will be presented to
Council for their approval.
A six percent (6%) increase :in all CaIIœrcial rates (see enclosed price ochedule) ,
also an incræse in residential rates effective AugtLSt 1, 1987.
All these prices will be finn for a two year period.
OlD RATE
NFW PROIŒED RATE
Curb
$ 4.15
$ 7.20
$ 4.35
$ 7 .ff)
Packdoor
Also enclosed are two (2) profornas, one representing an increase stataœnt for
1985 - 1987, and the other is the projected increase for 1987 - 19fÐ.
We at Laidlaw are very proud of our service. Enclosed is a ÛJstaær Calls or Misses
01art that reflects the nunber of æ11s we receive on a rrontlùy basis. These æ11s
make up custaœr questions, missed pick-ups, canplaints, etc. The nunbers reflect
the level of service.
I personally look forward to working with the City of North Richland Hills, the
i Staff and the Corncil to rmintain this level of trash service.
encl.
6100 ELLIOTT REEDER ROAD, FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76117 (817) 332-7301
I
I_
I
I () Cf)C')
~o .t:'- w W N N HO ~.
ö3: 0 VI 0 V1 0 NZ
. too [%1~
~ -(J) -( ) -(J) -u> n~ if)- ~
I· =0 ffi 0
...... ~ ...... >:2: t""'I
- ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~~
~ GJ:::: . t-4
Ç) b . . . C%1~ 8.
~ ...... N 0
. ...... ~ ...... N ~ t'%j
-t:1 t%j
I' ro
~ n
~. 0
n <: z
-(,'). -(J) -( ) -(J) =t-4 ro ~
~~ ~ >
I ~ '< H
...... ...... ~ ~ z
...... ~ ~
~ ~ [%1 f'%j [:j
. ('t) ~
~ gj ...... ~ ro Cf)
8 ~ +=--
I
I
--
I œ ::c t-d
~ :>
t-' ~
t-J. ...,.. ~
0..
~ ~ ~ I H'
I 3: >
0 L4
~ ~ ::s
~ " -3:
:r - . 0
~ z
. . ..... :j
I ::J .......
~ ~ n
~ t1 o Cf)
~ ct> ["%]
. 8 ~
8 ct> <:
::J H
I rt n
en t1:]
0
::s
~
I '<
I
I .
_
I
I
2:(j
o 0
~~
.. ro
t1
n
n C")~.
o 0 C-1
::J ~ ~
rTr1'
CU Ø-1 n
þ.'. ~.t.3
::3 ::3 :J
ct> C'D en
'1 Pi ..
CI1 en
~~~
.... . ~. +:--
rTM'~
:r:r
t"'" n W
o CJ 0
n enOQ
~ M' CJ
cnCi)~
t1~
. CI1 0
::J
-(J)-(J).n
i'J U1 Ø-1
. . ;::)
...... W en
N Ow
~
......
o
8
n
0
z
Cf)"'"
Q) 0'\ ~ W N H:>
NH
.0 ['I1Z
t:1
~
~ 0\ ~ ~ N
...... ~
~ · ~ . . ~
...... ~ ~
~
~
...... ...... Ri £:
~ ~ ffi to.)
· · en
\D ~ ~ ~ -
N ~
~
M
. ...... ...... ~ t'%1
~ N ~ ~ ~ ~
~ W t-4
·
N ~ ~ ~ ~ to<
0\ ~
t'Zj
~
['t1
~
C
t11
I Z
n
I ~ ...... ...... ......- to<
~ ~ ~ tJ' +' 0
. . . .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
þoC
H
n
~
I
""; ·c
too
en
N ~ ...... ......
Lj ~. k5 ~
~ p . V1
~ ~ N l,V
\D ......
l,V ~ N ...... ......
N ...... ~ ~
¡...¡ N 0'\
00 · 8 .
'[2. ~ ffi
N N
food
~ ~, 1-4 ...... H
Y. 1-4 ~ ntT1
· ~x
~ 8 ~ ~ ~ I ~
c::::o
tod>
en
o
00
"'"
o
......
"'"
00
~
M'
~
~
n
(t)
~
ct>
(t)
~
~
'<
~
~
~
~
a
~
~
<:
t::
i ·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
CTIY OF tnmI RIŒI.AND HII1B
asIa1ER CAIIS ΠMISSES
~-1~ qg calls in 170,1<::xJ pick - ups .CXX>3
January - 1 CJi37 38 calls in 170,1 <::xJ pick - ups .CXX>2
February - lCJi37 31 calls on 151,200 pick - ups . CXX>2
M:irch - 1 CJi37 39 calls on 170,1<::xJ pick - ups .CXX>2
April - lCJi37 49 calls on 100,æ1 pick - ups .CXX>3
M3y - 1987 35 calls on Iffi,881 pick - ups .CXX>2
The total nunber of custaœr calls for the six (6) IOOnth pericxl is 240 versus total pick _
ups of 983,612. The total call - in or canplaint level is .CXX>2.
. J
. .
~epartment:
Subject:
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Finance
7/13/87
Council Meeting Date:
Bank Depository Request for Proposal
Agenda Number: GN 87-60
The current bank depository contract expires September 30, 1987. State laws require
the City to initiate a bidding process and select a bank as depository of City funds.
Another legal requirement of the State requires the City to send proposals to only
local banks if there are two or more banks residing within the corporate City limits.
Highlights of the RFP
The Request for Proposal is structured to be a fair proposal for the City and Banking
Institutions. However, it is a pro-city contract. It is designed to maximize every
aspect of the depository relationship in favor of the City and yet compensate the bank
for services rendered on a set fee structure. Services requested are outlined as
follows:
1. Payment of services rendered by the bank are considered
separate from investment services.
- //'
2. Competitive rate on investments in Certificates of Deposits
compared to the Treasury Bill yield.
3. If the rates are lower than market, the City is establishing
up front that they will likely decide to invest directly in
T-Bills or other legal investments.
4. The use of Super Now Accounts for operating funds.
5. Extention of a line of credit in the amount of $500,000 for
short term purchases should the City desire to use this in
subsequent years. The rate is to be quoted as a percentage
of prime rate.
Recommendation
(
t
It is the staff's recommendation that the RFP be approved and bids taken for the
proposal depository agreement for fiscal years 1987/88 and 1988/89.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
. Other
N/A
-,-¡A
--r.m
, Finance Director
N/A
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
City Manager
Page 1 of
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
BANK DEPOSITORY AGREEMENT
AUGUST, 1987
I
Ie
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
II.
III.
IV.
VI.
VII.
VIII. .
IX.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
Introduction................................................
Calendar of Events..........................................
Criteria for Evaluation.....................................
Account Activities..........................................
A. Number of Accounts......................................
B. Services and Fees......~................................
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
Pledge Requirement......................................
Bank Statements.........................................
Method of Payment and Reporting.........................
Availability of Funds...................................
SuperNow Rates..........................................
Daily Cash Report.......................................
Account Executive.......................................
v.
Investment Activities.......................................
A. Securities Pledged......................................
B. Reporting Requirements..................................
C. .Safekeeping............................................
D. .Substitutions..........................................
E. Interest Rates Paid.....................................
F. Investable Funds........................................
G. tnterest Rate Calculations..............................
H. Direct Investment Alternative...........................
Overdrafts & Loan Provisions................................
Other Stipulations..........................................
A. Regulation Notices...........~..........................
B. Wire Transfers.......!.......J..........................
C.
D.
E.
F.
Right to Cancel Contract................................
Right to Audit Records..................................
Financial Reports.......................................
Term of the Agreement...................................
Bidding Instructions/Requirements...........................
A. Date, Time, Location....................................
B. Responding to this Request..............................
C. Additional Information..................................
D. Right to Reject Bids....................................
E. Other Stipulations......................................
Other Miscellaneous.........................................
A. Periodic Review.........................................
B. RFP and Resulting Contract..............................
C. Bid Advertisement.......................................
D. Authority to Issue RFP..................................
1
2
3
3
3
4
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
8
8
8
9
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
.11
11
11
12
12
12
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of North Richland Hills is seeking applications from eligible financial
institutions to be the Banking Services Depository and the Investment Services
Depository of the City. It is the intent of the City to have one bank provide all
banking services specified in this Request for Proposal. This bank will handle all
checking and other banking services, but, not represent the sole depository of the
City. The City is not constrained in any way by this contract to restrict its use of
other banks for investment purposes. Most references in this RFP will be for a
singular depository institution. The contract period will be two years beginning
October 1, 1987 and thereafter until the successor depository shall have been duly
selected and qualified according to state laws. At the onset, the City wishes to
communicate the primary objectives of the depository agreement, an important
component of the overall treasury and debt management program of the City of North
Richland Hills:
o
To seek a bank that is both capable of providing banking services and
willing to be attentive to the City's money matters;
o
To maximize the total dollars earned by the City on invested monies in
order to be prudent and effective custodians of the taxpayer's financial
resources;
o
To maintain a good working relationship with the Depositor Bank; and
o
To adequately compensate to Depositor Bank for services provided and to
allow a reasonable profit to be earned.
This contract can be bid in two separate parts. The proposing institution can bid on
the regular banking services, on the investment services, or both the banking and
investment services.
(
,
This Request for Proposal, or "RFP", is intended to serve as the bid form for the
depository agreement. There are several blanks to fill in and questions to be
answered. The depository agreement will be prepared based on the bidder's response
to this RFP. All points outlined and materials requested should be incorporated into
the bidder's reply to be considered for evaluation. Attachments will be appropriate
in order to answer some of the enclosed questions.
The depository review process will be coordinated by Mr. Lee Maness, Finance
Director. The City desires to enter into a contract that will maximize the City's
interests, yet will be viewed as a good agreement on behalf of the Bank. City staff
will be happy to answer any questions pertaining to this RFP.
[1]
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
In order to assure a safe depository and maximum investment possibilities, each
institution submitting a proposal will supply the City with the following items as
part of their proposal:
o
Financial statements for the most recent fiscal year.
o
Current availability schedules.
o
Statement regarding any recent or forseen mergers or
acquisitions. (The availability statements and merger
or acquisition statements submitted by prospective bidders
will be kept confidential and will not be available to the
public or other bidders).
II. CALENDAR OF EVENTS
TARGET DATE
DESCRIPTION OF EVENTS
July 13, 1987
Present RFP to City Council for approval.
July· 14, 1987
Host a bidder's conference at 10:00 a.m.
to review RFP approach and content.
July 20, 1987
Advertise bank depository notice in the
newspaper.
August 10, 1987
~
,
Receive proposals from interested banks.
10:00 a.m. at City Hall.
August 24, 1987
Review recommendation with the City Council
and award the contract.
October 1, 1987
New bank depository contract period begins.
[2]
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
III. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION
The City staff and advisors will review the submitted proposals very carefully. The
recommendations will be based on the bid determined to be best on behalf of the City
and the taxpayers. As an indication of what will be considered in the evaluation of
the proposals, the following areas are listed:
o
Ability of the bank to perform the requested services.
o
Responsiveness to needs of the City, both in time
required to complete transactions and in the scope of
services offered.
o
Agreement to points outlined in this RFP.
o
Interest rates paid on time deposits.
o
Cost of banking services.
o
Financial stability of the bank.
IV. ACCOUNT ACTIVITIES
II A. The City intends to establish the following bank accounts:
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
ACCOUNT NAME
TYPE
Consolidated Account
Payroll Imprest Fund
Insurance Imprest Account
SuperNow
SuperNow
SuperNow
The Consolidated Account consists of all of the City's operating funds, capital
improvement funds, and interest & sinking funds except for those previously
established with other institutions by bond ordinance. The Payroll Imprest Account
is a clearing account for payroll and is maintained at a low level. The Insurance
Imprest Account is a clearing account and is drafted monthly to cover disbursements
for insurance claims.
The City reserves the right to open or close any number or type of accounts
throughout the period, if necessary.
[3]
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
B.
10.
11.
12.
The services which should be made available
limited to the following.
Fee Charged/Per
Unit
Estimated
Volume
to the City include but are not
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Account Maintenance.
Deposit Tickets.
Items Deposited.
/,/
Items Paid.
Return Items.
Printed Checks.
Wire Services.
Stop Payment Requests.
Coins Wrappers Furnished.
Night Depository Bags.
Cancelled Checks Returned in
Numerical Order.
Safe Deposit Boxes. (12X12XI0)
These are estimates that represent volumes for the last year. The Consolidated
Account and the Payroll Imprest Fund will require continuous form checks that are
run on the computer. Check style and format will be specified by the City of
North Richland Hills. There will be no checks for Insurance Imprest Account.
The transactions for that account will be accomplished by wire transfer or by
internal transfer advice.
1.
3
2.
124/Mo.
3.
16152/Mo.
4.
883/Mo.
5.
46/Mo.
6.
10,592
7.
146/Yr.
8.
24/Yr.
9.
~
,
12
1539/Mo.
[4]
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I F.
I
I
G.
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
C. Should the proposing bank bid for the banking activities only and not the
investment activities in the following section, the balances maintained in the
SuperNow accounts must be collateralized in the same manner and under the same
stipulations as outlined in the Investment Activities section. The average
ledger balances will not exceed $500,000.
D. Bank statements should be rendered within 5 working days after the close of the
calendar month. The statement must include deposits made on the last day of the
period. The accompanying checks must be arranged in numerical order.
E. The City intends to pay for all account services provided by the Bank as set _
forth in section IV-B. The method expected to be used for the payment of these
services is the direct payment method. The City will require an account analysis
each month which will clearly show volume counts, fees charged, and total price
for servicing the account. The account analysis should also show average ledger
balances, average uncollected funds, average collected balances, interest rates
and the amount of interest paid.
The City of North Richland Hills will 'require an account analysis even if the
Bank were to bid the services at no cost. Please submit a sample of the monthly
account analysis statement that will be provided to the City of North Richland
Hills.
The City desires to receive same day credit for all funds deposited by 2:00 p.m.
and drawn on a bank located in the City of North Richland Hills, and next day
credit for all funds deposited by 4:00 p.m. The funds should be available for
any investment transactions that can (be executed. If not invested, the funds
should earn interest at whatever rate i4 being paid for SuperNow accounts.
Please provide a detailed explanation of the Bank's policy and methodology used
in the setting of rates paid on SuperNow accounts. Also,· provide a schedule of
all rates paid on SuperNow accounts since January 5, 1985. Specifically
indicate if the rates are applied to ledger balances or collected balances.
Indicate when the rates change and if they are based on a market rate such as
T-Bill discount or yield rate.
[5]
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
H. For cash management purposes, the City will require the bank to provide, on a
daily basis via telephone the bank balance of accounts and a list of checks over
$10,000 that have cleared the City's account.
I. To insure the smooth implementation and continuation of the bank services, the
City requests that at least one bank officer be assigned the task of coordinating
the account, handling all inter-account transfers and expediting the solution of
any problems the City may have in regard to the accounts. The City would also
request a trained and competent back-up, familiar with all daily transactions, be
immediately available in the absence of the designated account individual.
V. INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES
A. As security for the deposits of the City of North Richland Hills, the Bank shall
pledge to the City securities equal to the largest total balances the City of
North Richland Hills maintains in the Bank. This is estimated to be $500,000
plus the maximum investment in C.D.'s proposed by the Bank. The securities
comprising the pledge shall be valued at par or market, whichever is lower. The
securities so pledged, the amounts thereof and the time for pledging same must
satisfy the requirements of Article 2560 Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. and the Public
Funds Investment Act of 1987.
B. The Bank shall provide the City a report of securities pledged at the end of each
month or at any time requested by the City Manager, the City Treasurer or a
designated representative. This report should reflect the following information
at the end of each month:
Total Pledged Securities itemized by:
0 Name. (
0 Type/Description. I
0 Par Value.
0 Market Value at Month End.
0 Maturity Date.
0 Moody's or Standard & Poors Rating.
C. The DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION will place the pledged securities for safekeeping
in a custodial account at the Federal Reserve Bank, a trust department of a
commercial bank, or through another financial institution not owned or
controlled by the DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION or its holding company. The
original copy of all security receipts shall be filed with the Finance
Director of the City of North Richland Hills. The City will reimburse the
Depositor Bank for safekeeping charges, if any. Specify the safekeeping
charges that will apply:
[6]
I
Ie
I
I
I
I D.
I
I
I E.
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
Please submit a copy of the safekeeping agreement and the name of the Trustee
Bank to be used in the event you are awarded the bank depository contract. The
safekeeping agreement must clearly state that the Trustee is instructed to
release the collateralized securities to the City if the City has determined
that the Bank has failed to pay on any accounts, including matured investments in
certificates of deposit, or the City has determined that the City's funds are in
jeopardy for whatever reason including involuntary closure or change of
ownership, and if the instructions for release have been formally requested by
the City Council by ordinance or resolution.
The Safekeeping Agreement must have signatories from the Trustee Bank, the
Depository Bank and the City of North Richland Hills.
Any substitutions of the securities or reductions in the total amount pledged may
be made only by and with proper written authorization approved by the City -
Manager, the Finance Director, or a designated representative. The City must
approve all securities pledged. In the case of a reduction, the Bank must
provide in writing that collateral will be available when needed to meet normal
City balance increases throughout the year. Any state or local government bonds
pledged must have a rating of "A" or better by Moody's Investor Services.
Subject to government regulations, the following is a schedule of bids for single
maturity time deposits or certificates of deposit to be completed by the
proposing financial institutions:
Certificates of Deposit - $100,000 or More:
--
MATURITY BASE ADJUSTMENTS TO BASE
14 - 29 days * plus/minus basic points
30 - 59 days * plus/minus basic points
60 - 89 days * plus/minus basic points
90 - 119 days * plus/m~nus basic points
120 - 149 days * , pltis/mtnus basic points
150 - 179 days * plus/minus basic points
180 - 209 days * plus/minus basic points
210 - 239 days * plus/minus basic points
240 - 269 days * plus/minus basic points
270 - 299 days * plus/minus basic points
300 - 329 days * plus/minus basic points
330 - 365 days * plus/minus basic points
(Strike one)
*
Note:
The base will be the Treasury Bill Yield for the
Maturity closest to the desired certificate of
deposit maturity date as published in the Wall
Street Journal for the preceding day of the
investment transaction. In case of a publication
error, the City will accept any corrections from
the Bank if they are in writing with the source
cited.
-
[ 7]
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
The base used in the bid cannot be changed from that specified above. The City
may reject any bid that does not have C.D. rates measured against T-Bill yields
as prescribed above.
The bids will be evaluated by evenly weighting each investment bracke~ based on
the ceiling, if any, proposed by the Bank in section F below.
F. Investable Funds. In addition to the normal operating revenues deposited and the
operating monies disbursed, this depository agreement will cover all investable
proceeds from the issuance of construction bonds, not to exceed the limitation
established by the Bank in the paragraph below, as long as the rates bid for
investments exceed the Treasury Bill yield for an investment of similar length. .
If the interest rates proposed to be paid on C.D.'s are lower than the Treasury
Bill yield for an investment of similar length, then the Direct Investment
Alternative defined in section V-H will apply. This contract will not cover
interest and sinking funds or debt reserve funds covered by separate paying agent
agreements under existing and future bond covenants.
Please state the maximum amount, if any, of pledged securities which the Bank is
willing or able to commit for collateralized investments and SuperNow accounts
throughout the contract period
G. Interest Calculations. Interest on all certificates of deposit shall be computed
on an actual day basis, and the interest will be paid to the City of North
Richland Hills on the last business day of the month or the maturity date,
whichever is earlier. Payment will be made by crediting the bank account. The
Finance Director shall be notified by the Bank of the interest amount on or
before the last day of the month. Interest calculations will include the first
day in the investment period but will 'not include the day of maturity.
H. Direct Investment Alternative. The City of North Richland Hills desires a
depository agreement which enables all investments to be in the form of
certificates of deposit issued by the Bank. However, since the state law now
allows the City to invest in direct debt securities of the U. S. Government, the
City will select this permissible alternative in the event the proposed C.D.
rates are not greater than the yields for Treasury Bills.
[8]
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I A.
--
I
!I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
In the event the City elects to invest directly in T-Bills, or any other
allowable government securities, the City may desire for the depository Bank to
execute the order and effect the transaction. The City will desire for the Bank
to show that at least three (3) telephone bids were taken and a summary provided
showing rates, bidders, time of bid and any other information that will provide
documentation of the bidding process which may be reviewed by the City's
independent auditors. Should this alternative be selected, what charges, if any,
would be made to the City's account?
Proposed Fee
If the City decides to invest directly in Treasury Bills or any other allowable
security, the Depositor Bank will be allowed to match the yield on the investment
yield at the time of each investment decision.
VI. OVERDRAFTS & LOAN PROVISIONS
--
The City does not intend to have a net overdraft position throughout the course
of the contract. An overdraft is defined as a negative demand balance in the
City accounts collectively, not by indivDual account.
Should an overdraft occur in the aggregate, the following
apply:
stipulations shall
1. The maximum number of days the overdraft will be allowed is
2. The maximum amount of the net overdraft to be allowed will be $
. II
3. The interest rate will be
day basis.
per annum computed on an actual
In the event a check or checks shall be presented for payment on any account or
accounts maintained by the City of North Richland Hills, where there shall be
insufficient funds for the purpose of paying checks, then the Depository Bank
agrees to promptly notify the Finance Director of the City of North Richland
Hills, by telephone or other means, of the existence of the overdraft situation,
and to provide the Finance Director a period not exceeding one business day to
respond to such overdraft.
[9]
I
~ B.
I
I
I
I
I
A.
I
I
B.
~
I
I
I
I
The Bank agrees to loan funds to the City of North Richland Hills on a short term
basis, if needed, for operational purposes and for capital expenditures only.
The short-term loan amount that will be assumed for bid evaluation purposes is an
eighty percent (80%) equipment loan of $500,000 set up on a five year payback
schedule which must be rolled over at the end of the two year contract period.
The payment period will be monthly. If the interest rate is stated as a
percentage of prime, you must indicate how closely your bank's prime interest
rate tracks the accepted New York prime rate which was 8.25% on June 19, 1987.
The basis for computing the rate to be paid the Bank by the City of North
Richland Hills, is as indicated below:
VII. OTHER STIPULATIONS
The successful bidder will notify the City in writing within ten (10) day of any
changes in Federal or State regulations or laws that would thereafter affect the
depository agreement. The Bank shall also notify the City of any services that
become available to the City throughout the contract period.
Wire transfers must be consummated on the same day instructions are received from
the City, or the next day if instructions are received after the necessary time
deadline for current date action. The proposal shall specify any time
limitations and schedules required by the bank. Notification of wire transfers
shall be made within one hour of the transaction and a duplicate copy furnished
to the City within twenty-four hours.
Banks are requested to attach a copy of their wire transfer agreement as part of
the bid proposal.
. j
C. That in the event it would be ruled illegal under the provisions of any Federal
Statute or regulation for the Bank to pay interest in the manner outlined in this
RFP, then the City expressly reserves the right and privilege to cancel the
contract and to re-bid the depository services.
I
D. The Bank's records relating to the City of North Richland Hill's accounts shall
be open to review by either City staff members or City appointed independent
auditors during normal business hours.
I
~
I
I
[10]
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
E.
The City requests that selected staff and City Council members be issued credit
cards. The bank should be notified in writing by the Director of Finance of any
additions or deletions of personnel authorized credit cards. This request will
run concurrent with the Bank Depository Contract.
VIII. BIDDING INSTRUCTIONS/REQUIREMENTS
A.
Sealed bids or proposals clearly marked "Depository Application" should be
delivered to the following person by 10:00 a.m., August 10, 1987:
Ms. Jeanette Rewis,
City Secretary
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
NO BID WILL BE RECEIVED AFTER 10:00 A.M.
-~~-
-~
B.
The proposing Bank should use this RFP form as the OFFICIAL BID FORM to submit
rates and to answer questions. Any alterations, changes or deletions to this
RFP may be grounds for the City to disregard and reject the RFP and the bid.
C.
The City reserves the right to request additional information or to meet with
representatives from proposing organizations to discuss points in the proposal
before and after submission, any and all of which may be used in forming a
recommendation.
D.
The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals.
E.
The Bidder states that is is a banking institution chartered under laws of the
United States or of the State of Texas.
IX. OTHER MISCELLANEOUS
-
A.
The City of North Richland Hills shall require a review meeting at least once
every six months to evaluate the working relationship between the City and the
Depositor Bank. The objective will be to address any problems and to seek a
responsible solution.
[11]
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
B. The final appointment of a depository Bank will be made by the North Richland
Hills City Council. This request for proposal has been reviewed and approved by
the City Council. The bidder may be required to enter into a contract which
incorporates all of the obligatory points in this RFP. Otherwise, an ordinance
will ~e adopted accepting the Bank's RFP as the OFFICIAL BID FORM with
accompanying related schedules and materials called for in this RFP.
C. This Request for Proposal has been duly advertised and is being offered for
consideration to financial institutions inside and outside the corporate limits
of the City of North Richland Hills, as permitted by state laws.
D. Upon being awarded the contract, the Depositor Bank shall designate an individual
to be the official contact person for all correspondence. The City of North
Richland Hills shall do the same. The Bank shall be responsible for training and
communicating the terms of this contract to Bank Employees.
This proposal is submitted by the following person duly authorized to act on
behalf of the Bank:
Officer's Name and Title (Please Print)
Officer's Signature
Name of Bank
Date
Address and Telephone Number
[12]
~" r_ ;!'j ,.~~::" ;.":'''~?~::fi::~'''-_c;4~~'-·,:_/-_;:~~:,:~...~!,.<~¡,.- t-;-' -~ ;'-,~-: .,.~'__c:/~;r;; \f:>'" ,,"_'-_.-;.¡,
,. ~"."
_epartment:
Subject:
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Administration . . 7/13/87
- Council Meeting Date:
Industrial Park Boulevard/IH 820 Improvements GN 87-61
Agenda Number:
The City Council was briefed on June 16, 1987 on the possibility of North Richland Hills
taking the initiative to develop industrial streets and improve traffic circulation
alternatives to Rufe Snow Drive in the vicinity of loop 820. Since that time the staff
has discussed the possibility of right-of-way dedication and cost participation with
some of the affected property owners, and on June 22nd and July 7th meetings were held
with engineers at the State Department of Public Highways and Transportation.
At the July 7th meeting the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and Staff Members met with the District
Design Engineer, Mr. Billy Hardie, of the State Department of Public Highways and
Transportation regarding the proposed improvements. Mr. Hardie was advised that, in an
effort to encourage the Highway Department to accelerate the schedule for some of the
needed improvements, the City Council would be requested to fund some of the
improvements. Specifically, it was proposed that the City undertake construction of
additional lanes to the Meadow lake Drive/Industrial Park Boulevard Bridge over I.H. 820
and construct a south frontage road (with developer participation) between Meadow lake
Drive and the existing frontage road. In addition, the City would retain an engineering
firm to prepare a cost feasibility study of the turnaround at the Rufe Snow Bridge to be
timely constructed by the Highway Department. It was also proposed that the new
expanded Rufe Snow Bridge be moved up on the State Highway Department's priority
schedule to the four year letting schedule so that its construction would coincide with
the proposed turnaround.
~xtensive discussion was also conducted regarding the proposal to reverse the on/off
ramps west of Rufe Snow Drive. Mr. Hardie indicated that this will probably be done,
but that expansion of IH 820 to eight (or ten) lanes will be necessary in conjunction
with this improvement, which will be several years in coming. In order to proceed with
negotiations with the Highway Department, it is requested that the City Council
authorize the City Manager to address a formal request to the Highway Department
outlining in detail the proposed improvements as described above.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize City Manager to make a formal request
to the Highway Department for the improvements described above.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
a Operating Budget
., Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
e 411 ~_~~.
Department Head Signature I ' drty 1ilanager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
O;"~ -o::o;",-,:_:r'~ :-' ',_ "
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
.epartment:
Subject:
Administration 7/13/87
C ., M .
- ouncl eetlng Date:
Appointment to Wastewater System Advisory Committee A d N GN 87-62
gen a umber:
The Wastewater System Advisory Committee is established in the new contract between the
Cities of North Richland Hills and Fort Worth for wastewater services as approved by the
City Council on May 28th, 1987. The committee will be comprised of a representative
from each customer city and the City of Fort Worth and will give oversight to
appropriate issues regarding this service.
It is proposed that Councilman Richard Davis be appointed as North Richland Hills'
Representative to this committee, and he has agreed to serve.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that Councilman Richard Davis be appointed to the Wastewater System
Advisory Committee.
e
. -
. Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
e Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
K~
. Finance Director
City Manager
Page 1 of
1
I
.-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
....-e¡~~'\~
(@~
~~~!", x ~~
"'~~'UC>
THE GITY OF FORT WORTH
TEXAS
BOB BOLEN
MAYOR
June 22, 1987
Honorable Dan Echols, Mayor
City of North Richland Hills
P. O. Drawer 18609
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Dear l\layor Echols:
Section 29 of the new wastewater contracts requests the participating
customers to appoint an official representative to the Wastewater
System Advisory Committee. Now is the appropriate time to appoint
by official action the representative you want on the advisory
committee.
To create an official record of your appointment, the City of Fort
Worth requests you to complete the attached form, and forward it
back by return mail as soon as possible.
Your timely cooperation in this matter will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
~j3~
Bob Bolen
l\1ayor
. j
BB:bd
Attachment
K..
L..~
--
--
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ø>epartment:
Subject:
Administration
Amendment of Section 6.10, Ordindflce Nu. 984
(Council Rules of Procedure)
C "I M " D 7 /13/87
ouncl eetlng ate:
GN 87-63
Agenda Number:
This change is made for the purpose of clarification of this section.
A motion made at a previous meeting may be reconsidered by a majority vote in favor of
reconsideration. A second reconsideration still requires a unanimous vote.
Proposed Section 6.10:
"A motion to reconsider any action of the City Council can be made not later than the
next succeeding official meeting of the City Council. Such a motion can only be made by
a member who voted with the majority. It can be seconded by any member. The motion to
reconsider shall require a majority vote to carry. No question shall be reconsidered
twice except by unanimous consent of the City Council, except that action relating to any
contract may be reconsidered at any time before the final execution thereof. II
Recommendation:
The proposed amendment should be made part of the record at this meeting. It can be
acted upon at the next, or any subsequent, meeting.
~
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
;t~,
Department Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
I
",'~
1'1, '.
- .,----.---'
. ...._~-~.->-. -'......:..:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I:
6.10
6.11
6.12
6.13
.. .,-~."'.þ _. '.. -.-,,-...... .-.,.... -'
5. Previous question (two-third vote required)
6. Limit or extend limits of debate (two-third vote required) *
7. Postpone to a certain time*
8. Commit or refer*
9. Amend*
10. Postpone indefinitely
11. Main motion*
* Can be a~ended - others cannot
Reconsideration.
A motion to reconsider any action of the City Council can be made
not later than the next succeeding official meeting of the City
Council. Such a motion G:an only be made by.a member who voted with
the majority. It can be seconded by any member. 'No question shall
be reconsidered twice except by unanimous consent of the City Coun-
cil, except that action relating to any contract may be reconsidered
at any time before the final execution thereof.
The Previous Question.
When the previous question is moved and seconded it shall be put as
follows: .
"Shall the main question be now put?"
There shall be no further amendment or debate; but pending amendments
shall be put in their order before the main question. If the motion
for the previous question is lost, the main question remains before
the City Council. An affirmative vote of two-thirds of the City
Council shall be required to move the previous question.
Withdrawal of Motions.
A motion may be withdrawn, or modified by its mover without asking
permission until the motion has been stated by the Chairman. If
the mover modifies his motion, the seconder may withdraw his second.
After the question has been stated, the mover shall neither withdraw
it nor modify it without the consent of the Council.
Amendments to Motions.
No motion or proposition of a subject different from that under con-
sideration shall be admitted under color of amendment. A motion to
amend an amendment shall be in order, but more than one amendment to
an amendment shall not be in order.
Page 7
,. ., .. ',"
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Finance
Council Meeting Date:
7/13/87
ubject:
Ordinance Approving Sales Tax on Telecommunication.
Urd1nance No. 14ól
Agenda Number: GN 87-64
As a result of House Bill 1949 passed by the 69th Legislature in 1985, cities will have
the option of adding certain telecommunications services to their sales tax base
beginning in October of 1987. This legislature permits city councils to adopt an
ordinance adding to the local sales tax base the same telecommunications services now
taxed by the state.
The services subject to sales taxation include intrastate long distance telephone and
telegraph services. consumer convenience services such as call forwarding or call
waiting, information services, pay telephone services not provided by the telephone
company. and paging and mobile telephone services. Interstate long distance services
and basic local exchange telephone services will continue to be exempted from sales
tax.
To subject the services described above for sales tax, the City Council must pass an
ordinance which must be received by the State Comptroller's Office one full quarter
prior to the quarter for which the tax becomes effective. In other words, the City
Council needs to act in time to get the ordinance to the Comptroller by June 30,
1987.
There have been some misconceptions that this is a double taxation to the telephone
company. That the telephone is already paying a franchise fee to the City and
should therefore reduce the amount paid in franchise by a like amount. This is not
true. It is really two different items. The franchise fee is a fee to operate in
he City for use of our streets, alleys, and easements. The sales tax is a taxation
of convenience items paid directly by the consumers.
- .
Recommendation:
It is recommended that Ordinance No. 1462 repealing the exemption of sales tax on certain
telecommunications be approved.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other ß ~~
n1a - -~
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
N/A
Acct. Number N/A
S~ndS Available
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
T -..,:' «;~ '~;~~~~~~~::r-~~t-~!'f~~~","~~ < -f,,~;'Ÿ<''':(~·!::;~.~~~~~: ~:~~~ -:,\,:--~<,"r-'f;t':_:~ê>;'~~tr---"~~~l~~""!:ìt~_=;'-_~A;!oO ..,.;,--;,~I./' '_':_\__;'~:/:"'_,.~'--'?>:,-':,' ''', : ;'~b": ':{~,~: ~>L- ....""""
., ~" :.. .. .,'~~ :", "., ,7· .",~ ".., ',. ~.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
~epartmen~: Purchasi ng. Department _ Council Meeting Date:
SUbject: Bld award to Rlck Murphy Co., for Library Book Agenda Number:
Move and Shelving and Equipment Move In the
amount of $10,037.06.
7-13-87
PU 87-30
Dn June 30, 1987, at 10:00 am, sealed bids were opened for the Library
Shelving, Equipment and Book move. The results of the bid opening is as
follows:
Library Book Move
Vendor
Exceptions
Price
B & 8 Movers
* Murphy Co.
3
o
$3,928.50
$5,700.00
Library Shelvinq & Equicment Move
* Murphy Co. 0 $4,337.06
B & B Movers 3 $5,794.00
B & B Movers 3 $8,501.75 (alternate)
(if awa.rded both projects)
B & B Movers was the lowest bidder on the book move, while Murphy Co. was
the lowest bidder on the library shelving and equipment move. B & B Movers
submitted an alternate bid of $8,501.75, if awarded both projects. Murphy
Co. cost for both projects would be $10,037.06. If the City awarded both
projects to the lowest bidder; B & B Movers is the lowest by $1,535.31.
However, B & B Movers failed to provide a bid bond or proof of insurance as
specified in the bid packaoe. Consequently, staff recommends disqualifing
B & B's proposal for failure to meet bid requirements.
Recommendation: Award bid to~ick Murphy Co., for both projects (book move
and shelving, equipment move) in the amount of $10,037.06.
Finance Review
Acct. Number 13-50-85-6500
SU~ Available
. Finance Director
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
wepartment: Pt,1blic Works
Subject: W~r::ll1E::I Ro;:)d Street and Drainage Improvements:
Reimbursement Agreement with Mobil Pipe Line Company
Council Meeting Date:
7-13-87
Agenda Number: PW 87-23
In the process of widening and improving Watauga Road from Rufe Snow Drive to
Davis Boulevard, the existing 8" and 16" Mobil pipelines which cross
Watauga Road will require casing extensions. Mobil Pipe Line Company
requires a signed agreement and a $33,500 deposit to cover the estimated
constructioIl cost prior to their beginning work.
Funding Source:
Although sufficient funds are available in the construction account for Watauga
Road, this was not an anticipated cost of construction and may require future
appropriation of funds once the construction contract amount is known. It is
proposed to expense this cost as indicated below:
Watauga Road Construction
13-01-86-6150
,.
$ 33,500
e
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of the agreement with Mobil Pipe Line Company and the
payment of a $33,500 deposit to Mobil Pipe Line Company.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.) GO
_ Operating Budget _
- Other' ~~(LMt
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
See above
. Finance Director
Paae 1 of
1
I. v ·
¡ #
Ie
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
Ie
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~...-'
('
1~:f
\,..:
Mobil Pipe Line Company
P.O. BOX 900
DALLAS, TEXAS 75221-0900
June 26, 1987
\~\'\
~'Ù't. ~ ~
· Mr. Gregory W. Di ckens
Asst. Director Public Works/Utilities
City of North Richland Hills
P. O. Box 18609
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
WATAUGA ROAD _
STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
YOUR NUMBER PWL-0049-87
MPLCo. R/W NO. RC-179 & CBC-448
Dear Mr. Dickens:
Mobil Pipe line Company maintains and operates an 8" NGl pipeline and a 16"
crude oil pipeline that will be affected by the proposed improvement of
Watauga Road. We have reviewed the plans submitted by Know1ton-English-
Flowers, Inc. to our Corsicana Office and have determined that we will need
to extend the casing on both pipelines to accommodate the proposed improve-
ment.
With reference to your notification letter dated June 24, 1987, Mobil Pipe
line Company agrees to extend the casing on both pipelines in accordance
with the plans submitted for an estimated cost of $33,500.00 as detailed on
Exhibit "A" attached, subject t.p the fql10wing:
Mobil Pipe line Company agrees to begin adjusting its facilities
within a reasonable time after this agreement is executed and re-
turned. Mobil Pipe line Company shall not be responsible to the
City of North Rich1and Hills or any other entity or persons, if
any, in commencing or completing the required work.
The City of North Richland Hills will obtain and furnish Mobil
Pipe line Company any permits or documents required by the City
or any other Public entity to perform the required work.
The City of North Rich1and Hills shall issue a check payable to .
Mobil Pipe Line Company in the amount of $33,500.00 as prepayment
of the estimated cost of the adjustment. Should the cost exceed
the prepayment, Mobil Pipe line Company will expect to be reim-
bursed for the additional cost upon receipt of an itemized in-
voice issued by Mobil Pipe line Company. likewise, if the cost
is less than the prepayment, Mobil Pipe line Company will refund
the difference.
I. ·
".
?
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Mr. Gregory W. Dickens
Page Two
June 26, 1987
This letter is written in duplicate and if it meets with your approval,
please have both copies signed by the appropriate authority in the space
indicated below and return one copy along with the City's check in the
amount of $33,500.00 and we will proceed with the planned work. .
We request our easement be respected and not allow any work to be performed
over our easement until our work has been completed.
If you have any questions, please advise.
HJ:hrv
cc: Stan Ross
Executed this day of , 1987 by
for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas.
j
, ,
I ....
, IÞ c..
ß" .
r
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
"
Exhibi t "A If
COST ESTIMATE: Cost to extend the existing casing on each of the 8" NGL and
1611 Crude Oil pipelines at MP 81.1 to accommodate the expansion of Watauga
Road, North Richland Hills, Texas.
100% Refundable By: City of North Richland Hills, Texas.
COMPANY LABOR & EQUIPMENT
Construction Supervisor
Assistant Construction Supervisor
Company Inspector
Welder
Welder·s Helper
Truck/Tractor Driver
Pipeliners (4)
Welding Truck
Gang Truck
Vehicle Mileage
Out-of-Town Expenses
Engineering
3 days
5 days
10 days
10 days
10 days
10 days
10 days
10 days
·10 days
80 days
550
840
1,350
1,320
1,180
1,220
4,520
350
650
500 --
6,340
400
CONTRACT LABOR & EQUIPMENT
JD 690 Backhoe w/Oper. & Opere Trans.
Haul Truck for Backhoe
Out-of-Town Expenses
10 days
6,000
610
460
·MATERIALS
80· OF 20" Reject Line Pipe for Casing
80· of 1211 Reject Line Pipe for Casing
32 Sets Thinsulators
8 Sets End Seals
Vents & Marker Signs
Test Leads
Coating & Wrapping Materials
Sales Tax on Materials
(
,
180
130
690
100
100
60
300
90
OVERHEAD
5,560
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST*
33,500
* Estimate accurate for 180 days
SDK 3/26/87
_?;~~'~~:':Š~;o~~?'~-':~'~Fõ_T)/_,
w-y c. ~~_'''\/1:;'''i<·:~~'i-'':':' .
."', ~'~:< ;-. /::'-,'" - .~-~~-':;r' ('_''"-'_~'.'f~;j:,;
~-...-" Co - "" '" - >
_ ···0- ,
.,' ."l.'~. ."'",.....,-'"'..... .:~~:.'.'>c..
. ., ,.' '.. -,.... J'
,. ~ ",'
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Public Works
C ·1 M · D 7 /13/87
ouncl eetlng ate:
Ashmore Drive, Rogan Drive and lynn Terrace from A d N b PW 87-24
Glenv1ew Drive to I.H. 820 Vance Road Change Order #2 gen a urn er:
This change order is for the purpose of extending Vance Road where it presently ends
just north of Corona Drive to the 820 service road. The staff and CIP Committee have
been studying the extension of Vance Road for the past few months and it is felt that
this would help relieve some of the traffic congestion on Rufe Snow if Vance Road was
extended to the service road. The main purpose would be to allow the immediate
neighborhood to get onto loop 820 without having to go through the intersection at Rufe
Snow and 820. The owners of the property, which is the Richland Hills Church of Christ,
recently platted this right-of-way in their plat and they have agreed to sign covenants
to pay $11,239.89 of the total construction cost of $17,013.12. The covenants that the
Church of Christ would sign would state that if and when they sell the property abutting
this roadway, they would pay one-half of this $11,239.89 for each side plus interest,
when it is sold. The CIP Committee has approved this project and recommends Council
approval, as contemplated in the Master Thoroughfare Plan.
Funding Source:
Sufficient funds were appropriated at the June 8, 1987 City Council Meeting. The
proposed Change Order #2 with SRO Asphalt, Inc. should be funded from the following
account:
Vance Road Extension
13-13-86-6150
$17,013.12
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of Change Order #2 with SRO Asphalt, Inc. for the
extension of Vance Road from where it ends at the present time to the loop 820 Service
Road and to approve an amount of $17,013.12 for this purpose.
~
*
I
'I Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~
e Operating Budget -
I Other ~____ -Dl~ f:~~
I Department Head tQnature City Manager
~I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Review
Acct. Number See above
Sufficient Funds Available
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
I;
} 'j
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lie
I
KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
July 1, 1987
;>Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
~ City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
RE: 3-227, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
STREET, WATER AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS,
ALONG ASHMORE DRIVE, ROGAN DRIVE AND LYNN
TERRACE FROM GLENVIEW DRIVE TO I.H. 820
VANCE ROAD CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
Attached is Change Order No. 2 to the referenced project which has been executed
by the Contractor, SRO Asphalt, Inc. This change order covers the cost of new
curb and gutter and asphalt paving of Vance Road as shown on the attached drawing.
The unit prices shown on the attached change order form are based on existing
contract unit prices for Lynn Terrace, Rogan, and Ashmore Drive Paving and
Drainage Improvements. Permits from the State Highway Department and Sinclair
Pipeline Company are required before this work can begin. We will contact you
when all permits have been approved.
As you instructed, we have prepared assessment calculations for the curb and
gutter and paving across the Richland Hills Church of Christ property which fronts
on both sides of the proposed street extension. The Church address is 6300
N.E. Loop 820, North Richland Hi\ls, Tx.1. 76180 (phone 281-0773). The following
assessment calculations are based on 100~percent for curb and gutter and
90-percent for paving for a collector street, in accordance with the provisions of
the Assessment Ordinance No. 1338, dated January 27, 1986:
Curb & Gutter 2.00 L.F./L.F. ($7.20/L.F.) x 200 L.F. x 1.00 $2,880.00
Excavation 1.22 C.Y./L.F. ($8.00/C.Y.) x 200 L.F. x 0.90 1,756.80
Subgrade Stab. 3.67 S.Y./L.F. ($1.40/S.Y.) x 200 L.F. x 0.90 924.84
Lime 0.07 Ton/L.F. ($70.00/Ton) x 200 L. F. ·x 0.90 882.00
Prime 2.89 S.Y./L.F. ($0.45/S.Y.) x 200 L.F. x 0.90 234.09
Tack 5.78 S.Y./L.F. ($0.12/S.Y.) x 200 L.F. x 0.90 124.85
2" Type "B" 5.78 S.Y./L.F. ($2.82/S.Y.) x 200 L.F. x 0.90 2,933.93
2" Type "D" 2.89 S.Y./L.F. ($2.89/S.Y.) x 200 L.F. x 0.90 1,503.38
Total Amount of Assessment for 400 foot Frontage $11,239.89
Please call if you have any questions.
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I.;.¡
}
Ie
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I"
I
.
..
July 1, 1987
VANCE ROAD CHANGE ORDER
PAGE
2
~~w, ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
,
, Source of Funds:
'Bands (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
_Other 1.-",/7,-. .,' II)
I ' " -r¡" C· (, f
T De;;~~~t He!; ~i:~:~';e('
I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
epartment:
Public Works
Council Meeting Date:
7-13-87
Approval of Right-of-Way Acquisition for Two Tracts
Fronting on Watauga Road
Agenda Number:
PW 87-25
The first right-of-way is for a tract of land owned by Mr. Douglas Powell. This
tract of land was appraised by an appraiser hired by the City and the appraised
value was $56,900. The estimated assessment for that tract of land was $44,000.
Mr. Powell has stated that he will agree with the $56,900 value placed on this
right-of-way but he wishes to waive the assessment of $44,000 and accept a net
cash settlement of $12,900.
The next tract of land is owned by Dr. William Van Wyk and it was also appraised
by the same appraiser as Douglas Powell's land and the appraised value was
$56,800. Dr. Van Wyk has accepted an amount of $56,800 for this right-of-way
and he chose to be assessed on the project.
Recommendation:
The staff recommends approval of purchase of right-of-way from Douglas Powell
in the amount of $56,900 but instead of all cash, to waive the assessment and
pay $12,900. Also to approve the purchase of Dr. Van Wyk's right-of-way in
the amount of $56,800.
. rJ
Finance Review
--G.(L
Page 1 of
I
EX'~IBIT 4-8
~
K-E-F NO. 3-336
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HIllS
WATAUGA RD:
PARCEL NO. 4
PERMANENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
MARION CHIATTEllO & 'DOUGLAS POWEll
t\ . .
-, . [ -
. : ~ PARCEL NO. 5
L __~ DR~_ WM. VAN WYK
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
(50' R.O.W.)
;.
GO
"-
CD
('I)
Q
<
o
0::
~.
.
.
~
Ie
<
(.!)
=:J
<
t--
"~
:¡:
POINT OF
BEGINNING
PARCEL NO. 2
NRH JOINT VENTURE
CHE(, KED BY:
DATE:
I
1- .~'I..s(,
fa.·..,·.·
-
KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC.
rr~t '~ t~.NI'~ ........,. ,~
IR SET
SOUTH 208.0'
)U,~~ 1:111" II· l(CJ- &
DOUGLAS POWELL
VOL. 8114, PAGE 1254.
D.R.T.C.T.
PARCEL NO. 4
13,924.4 SQ. FT. OR
0.3197 ACRES
J. YATES SURVEY
ABST. NO. 1753
,"-HORTH 208.0'
IR SET
-2.
I
.-
. SCALE: 1 I' = 40'
R?~
~A1IIÞ
~ OF t ~
~~...~~.*.. ....'l;~&
I. ~Y;.' ". ~
" ...... '. ,
It:· .~.
,...\............ ...... ....
~ RICHARD w. ALBIN .
,..... ........ .... .........,
':t 2122 l!t:'
, i9;~.'.1\..~~~~;
-- "C·······~" ..
'. SU~~,
~--
PREPARED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS
I
EXHIBIT 5-B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARCEL NO. 6
lOUIS ENGLER
POINT OF
BEGINNING
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARCEL NO. 4
MARION tHIATTElLO
DOUGLAS POWEll
K-E-F NO. 3-336
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HIllS
WATAUGA RD.
PARCEL NO. 5
PERMANENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
DR. WM. VAN WYK
.;oø "R SET
S'OO~10'53" E 208.0'
co
Ø)
"-
en
(W)
Q
<t
o
e::::
"
.....
::::.
UJ ~
Ie Õ
0 :.. ..::..
~ I: :: : N
en : .:.' .:.. 0)
::t- '.:, ::t-
o .,
en ::.... en
co :-:. ..: co
Z ::-:. :: (I)
:/
..:.. :::.:
.::
". ::.. '..
..:: :::
::::. - -. NOR
V:,:-:: ~1-õJ. U
"" '"
<t
(..!:)
::::)
c::r:
.....
<t
~
TH 208.0'
13,927.39 S.F. OR
0.3197 ACRES
DR. WM. VAN WYK
VOL. 8114, PAGE 1244
V.R.T.C.T.
J. YATES SURVEY
ABST. NO. 1753
IR ~ET
NORTH RICHLAND HIllS MUNICIPAL COMPLEX.
( 5~O' R . 0 . W . )
f
I
.
-/
~
PREPARED BY:
CHECKED BY:
DA TE : I.. ~ tI- 9'(,
E~.~,."'.E. K~O\\1TO~-ENGlISH-FLO\\,[RS, I~.
~ - ( [ ...'" ( !.... t....",..., ..... __.. (~
--2D
SCALE: 1" = 40 I
~A~
~ ~~ OF ~..
.. ~~...~........~..f:.,
)4-.... . --.;?cS'
j..:. . ....'
~...~.................:...'.
C RICHARD W. ALBIN .
,. . . .... . e . . . . . ~ . . . . ... \. . . ,
.....i~ 2122 .:~,'
... ..""e. . .._
9 ~;·.!.'.".~.L~(
. ~,'~..._.~~.
~ ~f.; SU"Þ þ
'..-
PREPARED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I ~epartment: Public Works
Subject: Big Fossil Creek Ei.osion Control Bid Tabulation
I
I
I
I
··"·;1
:....:
...'.........'.'...:......,....',,·,.,.1
:;.~.
~ ",,}.
·······'·'··'·····',····1···;,·
'..'
~Ie
!~I
- Council Meeting Date: 7-13-87
Agenda Number:
PW 87-26
Bids were taken on subject project on June 30, 1987. The low bidder was Panhandle
Construction Company for a total bid amount of $663,553.25 with a bid time of
240 calendar days. The second low bidder was Olmos Equipment Company at a total
bid amount of $678,407.00 with a bid time of 120 calendar days. Liquidated
damages for time delay will be at $300 per day.
Because of the seriousness of the erosion problem behind the homes adjacent to the
creek, the staff feels time is vitally important with reference to this project
and the 2.2% increase in price over the low bid is more than compensated for by
the 50% reduction in bid time.
/.
Funding Source:
Sufficient funds were appropriated from the 1986 and 1987 General Obligation
Bonds. The proposed contract should be expensed as indicated below:
Big Fossil Creek Construction
13-23-86-6150
13-23-87-6150
Total
$ 26,885
$ 651,522
$ 678,407
Recommendation:
The staff recommends award of the contract to (Olmos Equipment Company in the amount
of $678,407.00 to be completed in 120 'calenda~ days.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
- Other ~
. . j i'; ,!
'- }ÎI\- ~_ ~ {_-(. IC'\_ ç Q
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
GO
Acct. Number
SUffiCient/~S A. vail Ie
F-~ /I /l
¡t2"':~ce Director
See above
Page 1 of
I.
,,'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth-Dallas
July 6, 1987
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
Re: 3-324, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
BIG FOSSIL CREEK EROSION CONTROL
BID TABULATION
In accordance with your instructions, bids were received on June 30, 1987,
for the referenced project. This project includes earth fill and concrete
slope riprap paving on the west bank of the Big Fossil Creek from north of
Broadway to south of Bewley Drive.
The bid tabulation for this project is attached for your review. As the
tabulation indicates, bids were received from five (5) contractors.
The low bid was received from Panhandle Construction Co., 5001 Saunders
Road, Ft. Vorth, Texas 76119, in the amount of $663,553.25. The high bid
was $888,934.00, and the Engineer's estimate was $800,000.00.
The second low bidder was Olmos Equipment Company, P.O. Box 458069, San
Antonio, Texas 78280, in the ~mount qf $678,407.00, which is $14,853.75
over the low bid.
The total time bid was 240 calendar days for Panhandle Construction Co.,
and the total time bid for Olmos Equipment Company was 120 days. The
liquidated damages for this project are established at $300.00 per day of
delay beyond the contraction completion time.
The Vice-President of Panhandel Construction Co. is Lynn Henry, who was
the Contractor on the Morgan Meadows drainage project. Attached is a
letter from Mr. Henry stating that although they bid 240 days for this
project, they expect to be complete by the end of 1987, or sooner, if
weather permits.
Also attached is a letter from Olmos Equipment Company along with a
"Contractor's Qualification Statement" and list of other projects
completed. Ye have no experience with this Contractor, but references and
phone numbers are included for your information.
Continued next page ...
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I.
, .
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
July 6, 1987
BIG FOSSIL EROSION CONTROL
Page
2
Ve would recommend maintaining a budget of at least 10% above the bid
amount as required for possible change orders and quantity overruns. This
amount is still under the original budget for the project.
Based on the bids submitted, we would recommend award of the contract to
the low bidder, Panhandle Construction Co., in the amount of $663,553.25
for a period of 240 calendar days, assuming work can be complete before
the end of this year as indicated by Lynn Henry in his attached letter.
Ye will be present at the July 13, 1987, Council meeting to answer any
questions you may have concerning this project.
Wf~
RICHARD V. ALBIN, P.E.
RYA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Yorks
Mr. Greg Dickens, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Yorks
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
. j
I.-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
u
~
V"\ "
~
LL.J
~
g~
L.'._ 8
. .
I-S
lo'") ~j
:j :;
, ~
::~ 2
"-
L ~..J ~
-7 ~
,.-) ~;
~ :.J
~~ ~
63
"7 ~
~8
.
U
z:
Þ-t
N
u..
o
V') \0
>- . < .....
LIJ ~ >< .....
Z;CL¿J\O
~ t-......~
5~. ~
~c)X \0
eG~~ J.
~O ~
z: 3 N
30 I
00. ......
~~t: ã)
.....
. .
>t-V')\O
<(/)<0
U >< .....
>< ..c L¿J \0
L¿J +J t- ...... ......
0\ 0
...IN. N
...J X "
~W~ J.
·0 N
ëlZ3 ~
>...... .......
~~t: S
t-
Lr.J
Lr.J
X
V)
.
8 ~~
X N
t-O\L¿JCO
Z '-0 t- ......
Lr.J 0
~ co .
O-LnO
Þ-t ~ Þ-t
:::) z:
CYx 0
LLI 0 t-
V')co~
o .
3~:i
oo-V')
z:
o
.~
~~~~
V') x .....
z: V') L¿J \0
OO:I-......N
UL¿J \0
o . N
LLJZ::Z:: \0
...J::>I- I
c<~ M
zV')o co
< 3 ~
:r:..... I
~O. ......
o..~t: S
....
<
...J
=>
~
<
t-
c
~~
-.:>
··0
Lr.J 0:
~O-
Þ-t
I- ...J
~!
o
.. ~
Lr.J V')
1-0
<~
o L¿J
C-J
Þ-t ~
co V')
V')
V')
...J
-J
Þ-t
X
o
Z ..
<
...J
X
U
~ 0..
0:
..4
c
Lr.J
~~
:x:
u
c
z
<
C
LLJ
~ '
Lr.J
l-
X
LLJ
V') >-
C co
~
a)
co
en
en ~
~ en___ en
fG I fG 'to- 'to- 'to- 0
'- QJ '-~~~ 0-
~ ~ CJ~coco
.... '" ';QJ
~ '- ~:g:g~ ~u
~.f ~JJJ]JJ~~;
en QJ QJ ~ 1:",1: :&
+J '- ~ ~ QJ»>GJ.O
QJ U Q Q) COca"'tØLL._,....
.:l1I. 1:. '- ~ U U U U ,....
z: I: O-u '-xxx~c<
Oc '" u~c '- OLr.JLr.J~cÞ-t
~ ° - V) 0 Q .... 0')
1-... CO~" u.~ QJ......J Q C
0..+J I: QJ. -_ c___ u....
~~ t~Et~~~QJ~ggg~~~
~~ ~~~~O:E. .~~~~~~LL.~
Lr.J xu·... '" c · 0..... - _ 0') · . . U (!) "'0
o ~LL.~~uLL.&gQ.~~~~~~~
~ V') '- JJ- · c · ~ c.: 0: 0: 0: O')~ -J
UJ Q)........."" 0 = ~ = · ~. .... U
I-I:X .....~< <_en ~........._~xO~
~ I: U ~ ~ = .: U QJ · V') -. ~ ~ +J I:
""OQJ- I: I:,....~,~~~-V)'"
-JL+J"'enO"'~OQJ~~~~\O
UL"'I:"'~", :J:QJ I:~
"" 0 ~~ to +J '" · C en . . . ~ QJ C
Q)~CO~ G~G=~=~GGG~~~
"'O~en~ +J tOQ)'-O"'O-__ 0E
L"'enQ)·o ·3:3 -0 +J3:::3
- L_<,......... L~ _ 0 . . . u ,....
"'OU ,....V)O"V')en.~V)catØca:::3~O"
",co'Q)Oo.. ~I:cao ~-~LO')
ca~~~bo~o~EV')~CCO~~J
U fa C to COO 0 .... ~,....: = = I: '"
1:_ fa 000,....0 to: 0 OCO~\O 0- ._
~UV')UUMV')M+JMt-v)~N~U\O~
00000
U") U") 0 0
t-.. ...
V')NOCOU")~
O"""NO\"Ln
U......U")U")ON
. . . . .
~ ...... 0\ Ln \0
U")O\COCO"""
80000
U") U") 0 0
L¿J . . . . .
U"COCOU")M
~ N
ex
0..
OOU")OO
NLn......O\O\
I- .....
V)~"""\O\ON
O~~Ln~~
U .~~~~
~~~~
..... ....
M
.....
M
N
~
......
\0
I
N
....
U'")
0000
0000
·~~o~
..... N '-0 ~
.~~~~
~.....CO"
M M \0 ,....,
.....
0000
0000
·M~Or--:
N
OOLnO
CO \0 "0
. . . . .
~ N M .....
0'\ Ln ~ Ln
..... \0 M (',J
. . . . .
"ON\O
COO\""""
OOLnO
\0'-0 NO
. . . . .
"CO.....M
N
M.....M" "
,,~O~ ~
.~~~~. ~
~ 0 ("f') Ln .....
~ ..... N
"-
~
,
'-
,
t'
. . . . .
.~>:~>:
UUUU
Lr.J
t-
es::
o
L
.f
o
U")
Ö
CO
N
.
.....
CO
M
0000000000
OOOLnOOOOOO
öoo"':~~~öåö
ONLn.....O'\NNOOO
~O'\.....""cr.COCONO
. . . . . . . .
CO'-O~CO("f') CO~O
r-4
o
U")
·
.....
M
N
0000000000
OOOLnOOOOOO
· · · · · · · · ·0
OOOMM,....,U")CO~ .
ON~ ("f')("f')Ln ....0
~ .....
o
o
·
U')
U")
"
·
.....
"
N
g8~~gggggg
......... .
U")U")O" LnOU")OLnO
U")N~O"OC:O"OO
M("f')\o,....,~U")~,-oCOO
. . . . . . . . . .
Ln~MO'\Ln.........ONO
..... ~
o
o
~
\0
.....
OOOOOOOOLnO
OLn"O'\OOO"("f')O
· · · · · · · · -0
Ln N CO M Ln 0 ~ 0'\ 0\ .
a.n.... ~'-O" 0
N ~
o
o
Ñ
o
~
.
M
"
N
gggg8g8g8g
OOO~~OÖOÖö
N~(,,J~"LnLnOOO
\OCO("f')~coO'\"O\OO
';~MÑÑ ":MÔ
.......... ~ ~
o
o
.
\0
\0
~
0000000000
0000000000
· · · · · · · · ·0
OOCOLnLnCOOON .
N~ NMU")..........O
N ~
o
o
·
~
~
M
·
o
&on
N
0000000000
OOO~OOOOOO
OÑ~",~¿O~ÔÖ
LnNNO'\LnLnLn'-OOO
N~N""'O'\'-O"NCX)O
. . . . . . . .
&onNU")N..... O~O
~ ..........
o
o
·
N
Ln
~
OOOOOOOMOO
OO'-OO'\OOOMOt:)
· · · · · · · · ·0
O"N~,,\OOO\\O .
Ln ~ .....NLn .....0
N .....
~~~m~~~gg~
M~~"'" -:'("f')
N .....
· .X........
>- >-U>->-LL.LL.L.a..LL.L.a..V')
. .<... - . . . .
U UU,JUV)...J...J-J...J...J...J
~ÑM~~~ ~ ~~Ô~Ñ~~~~
~ --- --- --- ..... ..... ~
o
~
co
t-
z:
~
o
?¿
-J
~
o
t-
o
o
.
~
N
N
.
CO
M
CO
~
U")
CO
.
a.n
\0
.....
.
0'\
\0
"
~
o
o
.
"
o
~
.
CO
"
\0
~
U")
N
.
("f')
Ln
U")
.
M
\0
\0
~
Ln
\0
.....
~
Ln
o
CO
~
~
U")
o
N
.....
M
U")
o
~
N
~
a.n
V')
>-
<
C
ex
c:(
o
Z
LaJ
...J
«
U
o
z:
o
co
o
~
co
I.
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
u
z
......
~'
~
UJ
~
o~
...J=
'-¡-~
I-:
~5
-J ~
~~
L:..J '-"i
I ;
Z z
ö9
r--
~'ž
.;:>=
o~
z""
~g
N
LL..
o
N
..-
L&J
L&J
:z::::
V')
Z
o
..-
<
...J
::)
~
<
..-
o
~k
-;>
··0
wa:
:E;:o..
.....
..- ...J
o
~!
o
.. .....
w V')
"-0
eta:
ow
~
Z
00
.....et
..- 0
u a::
::)
a:: 0
t;:;~
Z..JV')O
8V')c(\O~
..... >< 0 M
W'-l)C\,I
o~..-...........
~g .. J.
a::a:~ 0\
CD Z it')
gg;: J.
0('\"')01: ..-.4
~('\"')..... N
o
w
~
U
LLJ
:x:
u
o
:f
o
LLI
o -.
z
..... LU
U .. ....
. ><
"0 LU
01: Z
LU V') >-
zec 0 CD
~O .....
0-;> ~
"
~
,
"
,
I'
l-
V')
8
L&J
U
.....
Z 01:
=> a..
l-
V)
o
U
L&J
U
.....
a:
0..
l-
V')
8
L&J
U
.....
01:
0..
0000
OOOLt')
1-.. ...
V) CO\OLt')......
8\o("I"')~"""N
CONO\O
.. . .. .. ..
CO ("I"') it') 0
\0 \0 CO 0\
.....
o
o
.
o
o
~
0'\
N
M
0000000000
OOOLt')OOOOOO
OO~ÑOOÖOÓO
O~"""NLt')OOOoo
C'OC'OMN......Lt')'-l)COOO
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
\C)M0 \OLt').......-.4C'OMO
............... .....
o 0000000000
o OOOLt')OOOOOO
· ·········0
o OOLt')NOOCCOO..
o O~N Lt')\OO ..-.40
N co ..-.4.....
("I"') ..... M ......
...... q- 0 .....
..~~~~
..... 0 M Lt')
.......... N
......
~
~
.....
.....\OLt')Ø\Lt')Lt')Lt')OO.....
Nq-.-4CX)..-.4N..-.400
Mq-~.-4 "":.("1"')
N .-4
. . . . .
>->->->-
. . . . .
UUUu
.
>-
.
U
>o>~u:u:u:u:u:v:
.< . . . . . . . .
UL&JUV')...J...J...J...J...J~
L&J
I-
<
C
L.
~ ~ ~
,~ ~
a. ~............ '"
~ cL ~~~~ ~
c.. ex CJ ~ CD CD
.... '" '; Q
a:: L. ~:g~~ +.IV
:l of '" :>.fiJjJj~~:;
'" Q Q .... Ë",c ~
~ b ~ -¡ Æ~~~æ~~
~ c:.L. s: vvv v....
c: o-v s..)()()(~c:<
fa U+-'C: L. OLLJL&JL&Jc:.....
~ V) 0 Q .... 0\
~ +-' "'0 u. ..., cu... ...J cu c:::
c::: cu· -- c:-__ v....
tæË't"2t:~cu~ggg~~~
:J ~ ~ ~ IX Ë . . ~ ~............... ~ u.. ~
U·_ Æ c::: · 0 'to- - - 0) .. .. .. u cu "'0
~LL.. ::)uLL..~ga..~f3f35..c:~;
:IE: V) So. Jj .. r:: .. ..... c: a:: a:: a:: 0) ~ ...J
[L] cu ---- -...- 0 =..... = . ...... ._ v
"-c::x: ~~< <-en +.I------------xo"'O
..... c: U ~ +.I = .. z V cu .. V') ..... ..... ..... +.I c:
~'ocu~ c::: c:-~~...............-V')~
...Js..+.Icnenoen.....ocu~...............\O
us..~c:cn~cn :z::::~ c~
-...- g ~ ~ ~ t ~ ...:' ~ g' ~ ~,...: ~ ~ .~
CU~ So. ucuu-cu=~uuuzo~
-o~~"'O +.I ~CU\O~-...--...--...- OE
-t~~~-:e~~:S_"8.. .t~,:
enou -V')a..V)0\.~V')~~~~..c:a..
cnCDlCUOa.. a..C~o ~~....s..~
~~~~bo~o~~V')~ooo~~J
V ~ C ~ coo 0 .- 0-_: = Z C en
c:_ ~ ° 00_0 ~= ° OCX)q-\O 0- ,_
~UV')UU("l"')V')("I"')+.I("I"')....V')~N("I"')U\O~
~Ñ~~~~ ~ ~~Ö~Ñ~~~~
~ ~ ~ .-4 ....-4 ....-4 .....
o
.....
CD
..-
Z
::)
o
~
ëi!
..-
o
..-
o
o
.
~
M
0\
..
CO
ex:>
CO
~
V')
>-
<
C
01:
<
o
Z
L&J
...J
c(
U
o
o
N
.-
Lt')
c
z
<:)
CD
o
.....
=
Ir-
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PANHANDLE CONSTRUCTION CO.
5001 Saunders Rd.
Ft Worth, TX 76119
ROUTING
J('8 NO.
I . ;~
F'.K G '1/ F
K ':c LLG
---
B ~F TEN
--
1\ ,:A DW?
---
GiiS MER
---
D,~C ass
--
E'W·ï' ~, JVS J
= ì/~Ϋ7
(
July 1, 1987
Knowlton-English-Flowers Inc.
1901 Central Dr. #550
Bedford, TX 76021
Consulting Engineer
Richard Albin
RE: BIG FOSSIL CREEK EROSION CONTROL
Dear Richard,
We understand we are apparent low bidder on the above referenced
project. We take this time to let you know our intention is to
complete this project in the shortest possible time, to take advantage
of dry weather and favorable working conditions.
Mr. Leon Hunt our superintendent that did the Morgan Meadows
Channel for you will be available with men and equipment anytime
after the 15th of July.
If it is possible for the City to give us a notice to proceed
by August 1, 1987, we anticipate job completion by the 1st of the year
or sooner, weather permitting.
I hope the above information will be helpful in your scheduling
of both manpower for inspection and1anticipated monthly draws. A
more detailed work schedule ihcludiAg monthly progress is now being
assembled for your convenience. We will try to have it ready for you
by the time a notice to proceed is given.
We look forward to working with you and the staff of the City of
N. Richland Hills on this project.
,/
v'
Sincerely> dA
¡ , ___J / ~1---'-
n T. Henry '-J
Vice-President
cc: Gene Riddle
par
JLlI·y 2, 1 987
Mr. Richard Albin
Knowlton-English-Flowers Inc.
Counsulting Engineers
Fort Worth, Texas
Re: Big Fossil Erosion Control Project
City of North Richland Hills
De a .,- S i }- :
Pursuant to your recent conversation with Mr. Davis we
have assembled the following information on our company
and would be happy to furnish any other pertinant
information you or your client might need.
Recent Projects Completed:
Fort Sam Houston Maint. Contract
Mr. Charley Hatchman 512-221-4787
F'rice $272,194.
Kelly Air Force Base Maint. Contract
Various Inspectors
Price $1,102,601.
Lackland Air Force Base Maint. Contract Price $353,476.
Mr. Jack Miller 512-671-2851
Collins Blvd Overpass City of Richardson Price $2,509~041.
Mr. Carl McChessney 214-235-8331
Northwest Park ~ Dete1tion Facil. Austin Price $4,876,596.
Mr. Bill Jeans 512-49~-2000
Cooks Lane Interchange City of Ft. Worth Price $3,857,200.
Mr. Bill Davis 817-870-8885
PrOjects Currently under Construction Metroplex Area
Patching for Utility Cuts Ft. Worth Price $720,000.
Mr. Bill Davis 817-870-8885 95X Complete
Hillcrest Rd. Extension Dallas Price $1,184,000.
Mr. Billy Burns 214-948-4673 60X Complete
FM 423 State Dept of Hwys & Pub Trans. Price $1,200~OOO.
Mr. Dwight Bi~d Denton Co. 817-387-1414 45% Complete
I 635 Frontage Rd. SDHPT Price $1,300,000.
Mr. Jim Barnes Dallas 214-235-2113 20% Complete
'I ,')
~ ....J ")~ \ !.. !,.."
I I " . ",/JI...: '
/ì / ..... -- I'
"('" A -"",\-,"" ') ð
<~ . 7'\,
".-¡. ~ ..1 l i ... . "../
-,~ .' C/ '" I (.,/
B~1 r-.k Refe¡- a·,-,ce :
Liberty Frost National
Mr. Bob McGivey 512-349-2661
We trust this information will assist you. Further we have
the available manpower and equipment to pla~e on the
project referred to above and compl8te same in the time we
of"fe¡-ed in our P¡-c'pc,sal to the city. ("Je hc.pe the c: i ty wi 11
take savings in time as a substantial savings both in real
dc.lla¡-s and ¡-educing the cc,ntinLled e>:pc'SU¡8 c."f the e¡-osic,n
problem this work will correct.
Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to
working with you and the City of Richland Hills on this
bad 1 y r-,eeded imp¡-OVelner1t.
Very truly yours,
OLMOS EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
J"DW/pd
I.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
OLMOS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.
Bexar County, Texas
CONTRACTOR: Olmos Equipment Company, Inc.
P.O. Box J¡58069
San Antonio, Texas 78280-8069
512-675-4990
Olmos Equipment Co., Inc. is a C~rporation
Organized: March 22, 1963
Number of years in business: 23
Number of employees:
150
PRINCIPALS IN FIRM:
NAME
--
TITLE TELEPHONE
PRESIDENT (512) 675-4990
VICE PRESIDENT (512) 675-4990
VICE PRESIDENT (512) 675-4990
VICE PRESIDENT (512) 675-4990 .
VAN L. CRAPPS
JIrtMY D. WELCH
MIKE HALEY
DEBBIE BROOKS
Construction experience of the principal individuals of organization:
~
VAN L. CRAPPS
PRESENT POSITION YEARS OF
OR OFFICE EXPERIENCE
PRESIDENT 35 YEARS
VICE PRESIDENT "35 YEARS
VICE PRESIDENT 10 YEARS
VICE PRESIDENT 10 YEARS
JIMMY D. WELCH
MIKE HALEY
DEBBIE BROOKS
(
FIRMS WORK VOLUME: AVERAGE ANNUAL CORSTRUCTION VOLUME: $15,000,00Q.OO
Percentag~ of this volume by constructicr¡ catagories:
Highway/Roads
15S
Earthwork
J¡OS
Site Work
30S
Utilities
10S
General Contracting
5S
FINANCIAL CAPABILITIES: Informat{on available through Padgett & Strateman.
1635 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 700, San AntQnio, Texas 78209.
!he person familiar with the statement is Charlie Davis, (512) 828-6281
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SUMMARY:
Current Assets:
Fixed Assets:
Total A.CJsets:
~,981,993
2,6Z&7t22~
7,75~,361
Current Liabilities:
Net Worth:
Total Liabilities &
Net Worth
ZI, '36,936
3,24~,127
7,15~t361
I.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
BONDING REFERENCES:
Agency:
Alexander & Alexander, Park Terrace Bldg., 6655 First Park Ten,
Suite 100, San Antonio, Texas 78213
Agent's Name: Gary Wheatley Agent's Texas Lic.No.: 75-123-55-75
Agency Telephone No.: (512) 736-43t1
Bonding Company:
CNA, 4100 Piedras Dr.E., S-205, San Antonic, TX 78228
Bonding Company's Texas License No.: 36-211-45-45
BANKING REFERENCES:
Bank:
Liberty Frost Bank, P.O. Box 32788, San Antonio, Texas 78284
Individual familiar with account: Bob McGivney, (512) 349-2661
Type accounts:
Checking, Loan
Bank: Bexar Savings, 1777 NE Loop 410, San Antonio, Texas 78217
Individual familiar with account: HaYden Grona, (512) 826-1777
Type accounts:
Certificate of Deposit
FIRM HISTORY:
Have yoU ever done business under a different name: NO
I .
CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE RECORD: !he listed Projects are at least 30S
completed or have been completed within the last two years.
Project Title or Description: Fort Sam Houston, Maintenance Contract
Project Location: Fort Sam Houston
Project Number: F41800-85-F4913 Contract Amount: $272,193.64
Project Owner (Firm or Agency); . SAÿC/OL-A
Address: P.O. Box 8218, San Antonio, rTexas
Owner/Owner's Representative that is most familiar with details of the
Project: Charlie Hatchman, Inspector, (512) 221-4781
Project Percent Completed: 100S; If completed, date completed: 02/14/86
Project Title or Description: Lackland AFB, Medina Annex, Maintenance Contract
Project Location: Lackland AFB, Medina Annex
Project Number: F41800-86-F1191· Contract Amount: $3S3,476.UO
Project Owner (Firm or Agenoy): SACC/OL-A
Address: P.O. Box 8218, San Antonio, Texas
Owner/Owner's Representative that is most familiar with details of the
Project: Mr. Jack Miller, Inspector, (S12) 671-2851
Projeot Percent Completed: 100S; If completed, date complete: 03/07/86
-
I.
"
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Project Title or Description: Kelly AFB, Maintenance Contract
Project Location: Kelly AFB
Project Number: F~1800-85-D0057 Contract Amount: $1,102,601.30
Project Owner (Firm or Agency): SACC/OL-A
Addres~: P.O. Box 8218, San Antonio, Texas
Owner/Owner's Representative that is most familiar with details of the
Project: Various .Inspectors
Project Percent Completed: 100~; If completed, date completed: 02/24/86
Project Title or Description: Via Park and Ride
Project Location: San Antonio, Bexar County
Project Number: FILE 11086 Contract Amount:. $160,21=:.00
Project Owner (Firm or Agency): Incore, Inc.
Address: P.O. Box 32189, San Antonio, Texas 78216 .
Owner/Owner's Representative that is most familiar with details of the
Project: John W. Corley, (512) ~94-7123 .
Project Percent Completed: 100S; If completed, date complete~ 11/25/86
Project Title or Description: U.S.A.A.
Project Location: San Antonio, Bexar County
Project Number: FILE 152A-5.1" Contract Amount:· $3~9,500.00
Project Owner (Firm or Agency): . Bartlett Cocke Jr. Construction Co.
Address: P.O. Box 34930, San Antonio, Texas
Owner/Owner's Representative that is most familiar with details of the
Project: 'Tom Mook, (512) 655-1031
Project Percent Completed: 70S; If completed, date complete:
. ~
Project Title or Desoription: North Star Hall - Marshall Fields Expansion
Projeot Location: . San Antonio, Bexar County
Project Number: HCBØS1071 Contract Amount: $386,522.00
Project Owner (Firm or· Agency): HCB Contractors
Address: 1100 North Star Hall, San Antonio, Texas 78216
Owner/Owner's Representative that is most familiar with details of the
Project: Gabe Ruiz, (512) 377-3257 ·
Project Percent Completed: 99~; If completed, date complete:
:. .... ~
...
-
I··
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
-
Project Title or Description: Incarnate Word Sewer Line Reconstruction
Project Location: Alamo Heights
Project Number: N/A Contract Amount: $31,346.80
Project Owner (Firm or Agency): City of Alamo Heights c/o D.R. Frazor
Address: 3211 Nacogdoches SAT 78217
Owner/Owner's Representative that is most familiar with details of the
Project: Richard Frazor (655-6110)
Project Percent Completed: 100% If completed, date completed: 01/29/87
Project Title or Description: Riverhill 12" Water Line Construction Project
Project Location: Kerrville
Project Number: KC-87-01 Contract Amount: $51,849.79
Project Owner (Firm or Agency): City of Kerrville
Address: 800 Junction HwY. Kerrville, Texas 78028
Owner/Owner's Representative that is most familiar with details of the
Project: Rick Conner (257-8000)
Project Percent Completed: 100% If completed, date completed: 04/30/87
Project Title or Description: Panther Springs Creek Outfall Sewer
Project Location: San Antonio
Project Number: 003218 Contract Amount: $421,133.25
Project Owner (Firm or Agency): City of San Antonio, Dept. of Public Works
Address: P.O. Box 9066 SAT 78285
Owner/Owner's Representative that is most familiar with details of the
Project: Frank Vega (821-3240)
Proj ect Percent Completed: 95% . . If completed, d ate completed:
Project Title or Description: Babcock IH-10 Approach Water Main Phase III
Project Location: San Antonio
Project Number: 86-3660 Contract Amount: $327,734.32
Project Owner (Firm or Agency): City Water Board
Address: P.O. Box 2449 SAT 78298-2449
Owner/Owner's Representative that is most familiar with details of the
Project: Roger Haller (225-7461)
Project Percent Completed: 95% If completed, date completed:
Project Title or Description: Welcome Drive Sanitary Sewer Outfall
Project Location: Live Oak
Project Number: L-0044 Contract Amount: $61,415.80
Project Owner (Firm or Agency): City of Live Oak c/o Bain McCrary Bain Eng.
Address: 16111 Nacogdoches Rd. SAT 78247
Owner/Owner's Representative that is most familiar with details of the
Project: Roger Medina (655-7223)
Project Percent Completed: 40% If completed, date completed:
-