The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1987-08-24 Agendas II. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ii·1 I ;1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HIllS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 24, 1987 - 6:30 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. GN 87-87 Record Vote on Proposed 1987-88 Ad Valorem Tax Rate Increase (Agenda Item No. 21) (Recommended Discussion Time - 10 Minutes) 2. GN 87-83 User Fees - Ordinance No. 1485 (Agenda Item No. 17) (Recommended Discussion Time - 10 Minutes) 3. Update on Bicentennial Committee - Mayor Echols (Recommended QJscussion Time - 5 Minutes) 4. Ordinance Regarding Naming of Public Facilities - Councilman Davis (Recommended Discussion Time - 5 Minutes) 5. GN 87-82 Increase in Municipal Court Fines & Fees, Ordinance No. 1482 (Agenda Item No. 16) (Recommended Discussion Time - 5 Minutes) I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 6. PS 87-12 Rpquest of lamar Savings Association and Technol Company for Replat of Tracts 4, 5, and 6, North Richland Hills Industrial Park Addition (Agenda Item No.9) (Recommended Discussion Time - 5 Minutes) 7. GN 87-86 Temporary landscaping _ Recreation/Library Facility (Agenda Item No. 20) (Recommended Discussion Time - 5 Minutes) 8. Possible Work Session August 31, 1987 9. Other Items 10. *~xecutive Session (Suggested Discussion Time - 15 Minutes) a. Personnel Discussion *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings law. If any action is contemplated, it will be taken in open session. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HIllS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 24, 1987 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. The below listed items are placed on the Agenda for discussion and/or action. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Ca 11 to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting August 10, 1987 5. Special Presentation by Mayor Echols 6. Special Presentation of Green Thumb Award by Northeast Tarrant County Chamber of Commerce 7. Removal of.ltem(s) from the Consent Ageñda 8. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (9, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20, 22 & 23) * 9. PS 87-12 Request of lamar Savings Association and Technol Company . for Replat of Tracts 4,5, and 6, North Richland Hills Industrial Park Addition (Located on Industrial Park Drive east of Rufe Snow Drive) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *10. PS 87-28 Request of Rufe Snow Village Partnership and Kroger Company for Replat of lots 2R through 5R, and 6, Block 1, Northland Shopping Center Addition (Located on the east side of Rufe Snow and south of Watauga Road) 11. SO 87-7 Reconsideration of Request of 5th Avenue Dinettes for Variance to the Sign Ordinance *12. GN 87-78 Park & Recreation Board, Ordi.nance No. 1477 (Postponed at the August 10, 1987 Meeting) *13. GN 87-79 library Board, Ordinance No. 147~ (Postponed at the August 10, 1987 Meeting) - 14. GN à7-80 Revenue Sharing Budget Hearing 15. GN 87-81 Adopting Supplemental Revenue Sharing Budget for Fiscal Year 1986/87, Ordinance No. 1481 *16. GN 87-82 Increase in Municipal Court Fines & Fees, Ordinance No. 1482 *17. GN 87-83 User Fees - Ordinance No. 1485 *18. GN 87-84 Cable TV Board Ordinance, Ordinance No. 1480 I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 19. GN 87-85 Appointments to Boards/Commissions - Cable TV Advisory Board, Park & Recreation Board, library Board *20. GN 87-86 Temporary landscaping _ Recreation/Library Facility 21. GN 87-87 Record Vote on Proposed 1987-88 Ad Valorem Tax Rate Increase *22. PAY 87-4 Approval of Payment to James & Sheryl Bellomy in the amount of $1,677.11 - Right-of-Way on Hightower Drive *23. PAY 87-5 Right-of-Way Purchase on Hightower Drive 24. Citizen Presentation 25. Adjournment I I- I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I 1-' I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - AUGUST 10, 1987 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CAll TO ORDER Mayor Echols called the meeting to order August 10, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. Present: Dan Echols Dick Fisher Richard Davis Marie Hinkle Mack Garvin Virginia Moody Linda Spurlock Staff: Rodger N. line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire lee Maness Gene Riddle Richard Royston Richard Albin Members of the Press Absent: Jim Ramsey Mayor Echols gave the invocation. 2. ROll CALL Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Councilwoman // City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney Finance Director Public Works Director Director of Planning City Engineer Councilman 3. INVOCATION 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JULY 27, 1987 APPROVED Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the minutes of the July 27, 1987 meeting. Motion carried 5-0; Councilwoman Moody abstaining due to absence from the meeting. Councilwoman Moody stated that on the last Council Agenda there was a request for reconsideration of Fifth Avenue Oinettes for a variance to the I I_ì I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I I- I August 10, 1987 Page 2 Sign Ordinance. Councilwoman Moody stated the cover sheet was sent out wrong and she felt the City owed them the courtesy to reconsider it at the next Council meeting. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to reconsider the request of Fifth Avenue Dinettes at the August 24, 1987 meeting. Motion carried 6-0. 5. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilwoman Moody removed Item Nos. 11 and 12 and a citizen removed Item No. 14 from the Consent Agenda. 6. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (9, 10, & 15) APPROVED - // Mayor Pro Tem Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 6-0. 7. GN 87-74 AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH THE CLOSING OF FOUNTAIN STREET BETWEEN VENICE STREET AND DAWN DRIVE APPROVED Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to set the public hearing for September 28, 1987. Motion carried 6-0. 8. GN 87-75 WATAUGA ROAD REALIGNMENT & STREET VACATION APPROVED Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to set the public hearing for September 28, 1987. Motion carried 6-0. * 9. GN 87-76 CERTIFICATION OF PROPERTY TAX COLLECTION RATIO FROM JULY 1, 1987 THRU JULY 30, 1988 APPROVED *10. GN 87-77 CHARTER AMENDMENT ELECTION, ORDINANCE NO. 1476 APPROVED I 1_. I I I I I I I 1-' I I I I I I I Ie. I August 10, 1987 Page _3 11. GN 87-78 PARK & RECREATION BOARD, ORDINANCE NO. 1477 POSTPONED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to postpone GN 87-78 until after the August 17, 1987 work session. Motion carried 6-0. 12. GN 87-79 LIBRARY BOARD, ORDINANCE NO. 1478 POSTPONED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to postpone GN 87-79 until after the August 17, 1987 work session. Motion carried 6-0. 13. PW 87-24 RECONSIDERATION OF ASHMORE DRIVE, ROGAN DRIVE AND LYNN TERRACE FROM GLENVIEW DRIVE TO I.H. 820 VANCE ROAD CHANGE ORDER #2 (FROM THE JULY 13, 1987 MEETING) Postponed until last on the Agenda. 14. PW 87-28 CREDIT ON ASSESSMENT FOR RESIDENT ON CHAPMA~ ROAD APPROVED Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Fisher, to approve five hundred dollars credit on the assessment on Abstract 130, Tract 15A, Gary L. Hammett property. Motion carried 6-0. Mary Lou Day, 7509 Chapman, appeared before the Council. Ms. Day stated that she had received her assessment bill and had been told that the improvements would enhance her property. Ms. Day stated Chapman was now a thoroughfare and she did not feel it had enhanced her property. Ms. Day stated she felt she should not have to pay the assessment. Mayor Echols advised that she would need to reappear under Item No. 16 on the Agenda because her request did not pertain to this particular situation. I ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I August 10, 1987 Page ~ *15. PAY 87-3 APPROVAL OF PAYMENT FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG A PORTION OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE APPROVED 16. CITIZEN PRESENTATION Ms. Mary lou Day reappeared before the Council. Ms. Day stated this property had been her homestead for 40 years and she did not feel the assessment improved the value of her property. Ms. Day stated she was advised that consideration was given to the homeowners on Watauga Road pertaining to the assessment. Ms. Day stated she also at one time had a buyer for part of her property, but had been told she could not sell until the property was platted. Councilman Ramsey now present. Mayor Echols asked Ms. Day how much property she owned. Ms. Day replied 4.65 acres. Mayor Echols asked Ms. Day if she was present for the public hearing pertaining to the assessments on Chapman Road. . Ms. Day replied no. Ms. Day stated she was advised that if the improvements did not increase the value of her property she would not have to pay. Ms. Day stated an appraisal had been made on her property by the City and she could not sell it now for as much as she could have se¥eral years ago. Mayor Echols advised that lf she had an appraisal to offer in evidence the City would certainly consider it. Ms. Day stated she also had to set her fence back nine feet from the road. Mayor Echols advised the best the Council could offer tonight would be to look at the evidence Ms. Day could present that would prove the . improvements did not increase the value of her property. Mayor Echols stated the Council could instruct the Staff to look at the information Ms. Day would furnish. Councilman Davis advised Ms. Day that if she felt the assessment was not fair and had proof that it did not increase the value of her property, the Council would instruct the Staff to look into it. Councilman Ramsey stated that until they had a professional appraisal the value was not actually known. Councilman Ramsey advised Ms. Day that she would not have any problems with the Council considering the assessment if a bona fide appraisal was presented. I I. I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f· I A.ugust 10, 1987 Page _5 13. PW 87-24 RECONSIDERATION OF ASHMORE DRIVE, ROGAN DRIVE AND LYNN TERRACE FROM GLENVIEW DRIVE TO I.H. 820 VANCE ROAD CHANGE ORDER #2 (FROM THE JULY 13, 1987 MEETING) RESCINDED Councilman Ramsey stated he was under the opinion that Vance Road was part of the 1968 bond issue. Councilman Ramsey stated he still was not 100 percent convinced that it was part of the 1968 bond issue, therefore he did not feel that legally the City Council could appropriate money for a street that was not part of the bond issue. Mayor Echo1s asked Mr. line to brief Councilman Ramsey on the discussion of Vance Road in. Pre Council. Mr. line stated he had talked to a representative of the developer, which - in this case was the Church of Christ, and he had advised him that the Board of Elders had voted to authorize Mr. Charles Owen to obtain bids for the extension of Vance Road. Mr. Line stated the developer anticipated construction to begin within the next two to three weeks. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to rescind Change Order #2 for Vance Road. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Echols asked if there was anyone present that had not filled out a Request to Speak Form who would like to speak under Citizens Presentation. 16. CITIZENS PRESENTATION Mr. Don Cartwright, 4924 V~nce Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Cartwright asked if the Church paid the taxes. Mr. Line advised that property that was used for a church was exempt. Mr. Line stated this was excess property and they paid taxes. Mr. Cartwright asked how long they had been paying taxes on this piece of property. Mayor Echols stated the Church started paying taxes when the property was rezoned to commercial. Mr. Peter Kemp, 4513 Vance Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Kemp stated that the residents on Vance Road did not want the street extended. Mr. Kemp stated the issue was whether this would benefit the City. Mr. Kemp stated there was a traffic problem on Vance Road and there had been several accidents. I I. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I I f· I - August 10, 1987 Page _6 Mayor Echols stated that the Council was not voting on whether or not to extend Vance Road, but rescinding the change order whereby the City would not be paying any of the costs. Mayor Echols advised that the extension of Vance Road had been on the Master Thoroughfare Plan for a number of years and on that basis the City required the developer to dedicate right-of-way and to build streets. Mayor Echols stated the developer was responsible for the street. Councilman Ramsey stated that he felt another misleading factor for the community was that they did not understand the Thoroughfare Plan. Councilwoman Moody stated that she felt more information should have been given at the previous meeting when the change order for Vance Road was voted on. Councilman Garvin stated that one of the main concerns of the residents on Vance was traffic. Councilman Garvin advised that the Police Chief had a report made on the traffic situation on Vance and advised anyone interested to pick up a copy from the Police Department. Mr. Don Cartwright reappeared before the Council. Mr. Cartwright asked when Vance was opened would it be two-way north and south. Mayor Echols advised yes. Mr. Cartwright cited several traffic problems pertaining to Loop 820 Service Road and Holiday Lane entrance ramp. Councilman Davis advised Mr. Cartwright to give a written report on his suggestions on the traffic situation. 17. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary ~.-..,,~... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: eUbject: Planning and Development - Council Meeting Date: 8/24/87 Request of Lamar Savings Association l'echnol Company for Replat: of Traces 4, 5, aIld 6, North Richland Hills Industrial Park Addition PS 87-12 Agenda Number: This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Tracts 4, 5, and 6, North Richland Hills Industrial Park Addition. The plat covers the majority of industrial zoned property located on Industrial Park Drive east of Rufe Snow Drive. Technol Company is currently constructing a manufacturing facility for their company on the proposed Tract 5 shown on the plat. The purpose for the proposed replat is to deli~eate the ownership of the Technol property from the remainder of the undeveloped land. The Staff noted to the Commission that the applicants had presented a similar plat which was approved by the Commission and the City Council prior to the start of construction on the buildings. However, in working with the developers, the Staff identified a site problem with the location of the proposed Railroad Spur Track and the extension of_a required water main. The resolution of the interference between the two facilities eventually required that the building location be shifted slightly which revised the easements and fire lanes shown on the plat. In addition the electric company has requested additional easements for service locations to the Technol project. Since these issues and the modifications to correct them were identified after the Commission and City Council had acted and prior to the official filing of the plat, it is necessary that the Commission and City Council take action on the modified replat. The Staff also noted to the Commission that the approved Replat had included a ~stipulation that the property owners involved in the replat enter into a covenant for ~future construction of the proposed railroad crossing to carry Industrial Park Drive north to connect with Watauga Road. The representatives of Technol have provided the necessary covenant documents for their portion of the future costs. Lamar Savings, as owners of the undeveloped portion of the plat, have not executed the covenant. However, it is Staff's opinion that no future development can occur in the Industrial Park without further replatting. Therefore, the stipulation should be placed on the property that no further replatting may occur without the execution of the covenant for the construction of the !ailroad crossing. The Commission and the City Council are aware that recent revisions to the Thoroughfare Plan included the extension of Industrial Park Boulevard south and east across Lamar Savings property to connect with Holiday Lane. The required street extension is not shown on the current replat since the primary function of the proposed replat is to delineate the tract for the Technol project and the current replat is basically a restatement of an earlier replat which had been approved by the Commission and the City Council prior to the revisions being adopted on the Thoroughfare Plan. As in the discussion regarding the Railroad Crossing Agreement above, the applicants, Lamar Savings, have been notified by the Staff of the approved modifications to the Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget eo r Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available -g /J, _ - -, IJIl ?;~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I >1 oroughfare Plan which will dictate additional right of way requirements on any future replatting of the property. The City Council may wish to add the stipulation to the approval of the replat request that no future replatting will be considered which does not include the required right of way dedication. Engineering plans for the development of the Technol site were provided with the initial submittal and the construction has been accomplished based on those plans. The Staff had no further comments related to the engineering design. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the replat of Tract 4, 5, and 6, North Richland Hills Industrial Park Addition with the stipulation that no further replatting in the subdivision be submitted without the covenant agreement for the railroad crossing being executed. As noted above, the Staff would also recommend that the stipulation be added requiring the street dedication on Industrial Park Boulevard to Holiday Lane on any future replatting of the property. - . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Page 2 of 2 ~ I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, AUGUST 13, 1987 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CONSIDERATION OF OF JUNE 25, 1987 N OF THE MINUTES , 1987 1. PS 87-12 PS 87-12 APPROVED .~. The meeting was called to order Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Members on Bowen John Schwinger Mark Wood Carole Flippo George Tucker Richard Royston Wanda Calvert Membe PI ning/Dev. oordinator Manny Trico!i Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Wood and Mr. Tucker abstaining since they were not present at the meeting. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 3-0 with Ms. Flippo and Mr. Tucker abstaining since they were not present at the meeting. Request of Lamar Savings Association and Tecnol Company for replat of Tracts 4, 5, & 6, N.R.H. Industrial Park Addition. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PS 87-12 with the stipulation that no more replats will be granted until such time they have signed agreement with the railroad. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I" I ( ( City of J\8rth Richland Hills, Texas April 20, REF: PWM-0026-87 Memo to: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Gregory W. Dickens, P.E. Asst. Director Public Works/Utilities Subject: PS 87-12; N.R.H. INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION Tract 5R - Replat We have reviewed the subject replat and offer the following comments. 1. Replat should only reflect that Tract 5 will be Tract 5R and the other two (2) tracts will not be replatted. Tract 4 & 6 should be removed from the metes and bounds description and the title. 2. Fire lanes should be shown on Tract 5R. 3. Property owner should submit a "letter of agreement" to pay fair share of railroad crossing costs for Industrial Park Boulevard when said crossing is installed. Agreement or covenant should run with the land. 4. Show current zoning for Tract 5R within the boundaries of the tract. - . Ids cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Richard Royston, Director Development (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I , ~ '-( ( ~I . "(. ( Mr. R. S. Williams TESCO Region Engr. Supervisor P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth, TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number: PS 87-12 NRH Industrial Park Addition, Tracts 4, 5, & 6, Address or Location: East of Rufe Snow Drive, north of Industrial Park Blvd. Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert. Planning and Zoning Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than 4/29/87. Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) x Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made. (See Comments) :.. COMMENTS: TESCO: DATE: L./ - :<. Š - ?' 7 CITY: DATE: 4/20/87 SIGNATURE ¡(~ - SIGNATURE ~~ (!ð~...vr I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I t f r r" K. N. WATKINS General Superintendent of Distribution Lone Star Gas Company FORT WORTH DIVISION OF DISTRIBUTION 100 W. Morning.id. Dr. · Fort Worth, T..as 76110 April 22, 1987 Ms. Wanda Calvert Planning and Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: Case number - PS 87-12 Dear Ms. Calvert: With regard to your correspondence of April 20, 1987, on the above referenced case number, please be advised that Lone Star Gas Company objects to terminology as "10' Gas Easement". The Engineer has been notified and will refile plat as a 10' Public Utility Ease- ment. If further information is required, please advise. Sincerely, - . ¿J:lJt~ J. M. Seals General Supervisor II Facility Records Group km xc: file ·" I" ;1_ -I ,1 I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I - .. ; . , COST SHARING COVENANT (Railroad Crossing) This Agreement is entered into by and between the CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS and TECNOL, INC. WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, North Richland Hills Industrial Park Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, was replatted by a plat approved by the North Richland Hills City Council on July 14, 1986; and WHEREAS, as replatted, Industrial Park Boulevard is shown to extend across the right-of-way line of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad; WHEREAS, it will be necessary in the orderly development of the City of North Richland Hills for a railroad crossing to be installed over the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad tracks and right-of-way; and WHEREAS, certain owners of North Richland Hills Industrial Addition are willing to pay their pro rata share of the cost of installing said railroad crossing and street and storm drainage extension in accordance with specifications to be determined (the "Crossing Improvements"); NOW, THEREFORE, in connection with the aforestated replatting, and as a part of the consideration therefore, the parties have agreed as follows: 1. The City of North Richland Hills hereby agrees to contract with the St. Louis &: S.W. R/R for the construction of Crossing Improvements over the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad tracks and right-of-way. 2. :--Tecnol, Inc., owner, of Tract #5 as shown on the attached replat of tractš 4, 5 and 6 N. Richland Hills Industrial Park Addition as prepared by ARS Engineers ("Tract 5") hereby agrees to pay twenty-five percent (25%) of the cost of installation of the Crossing Improvements up to a maximum amount of $62,500.00; provided that, Tecnol, Inc. shall not be required to pay more than $62,500.00 in connection with the Crossing Improvements regardless of the total cost thereof. The amount payable by Tecnol, Inc. shall be paid to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas not more than sixty (60) days following final completion of the Crossing Improvements. 3. Tecnol, Inc. agrees that if it sells Tract 5 prior to the completion of the Crossing Improvements, Tecnol, Inc. will require that the purchaser of Tract 5 assume the obligations under this Agreement and thereafter, Tecnol, Inc. shall have no further liability with respect to this Agreement. 4. This covenant shall run with the land and shall be an obligation and charge against Tract 5 and its owner at the time the Crossing Improvements are completed. -1- I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I WITNESS OUR HANDS this ;.ç-$..day of 9'~ ,1987. TECNOL, INC. By: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS By: Its: ST A TE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TARRANT § I ,'J I) /'pn this day personally appeared Van Hubbard who acknowledged to me that he exé6ùted the above document in the capacit~ therein s d on behalf of Tecnol, Inc., to certify which witness my hand this ~day of , 1987. ) , <. : (, )' ,,' ') ,)'\ . Name pent: v I ~ Notary Public in and for the Stat of Texas My Commission Expires: / IJ -dtJ-! ¡ ,\ ST A TE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TARRANT § On this day personally appeared , who acknòwledged to me that he executed the above document in the capacity therein stated on behalf of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, to certify which witness my hand this day of , 1987. Name (Print): Notary Public in and for the State of Texas My Commission Expires: -2- ~ ~-'r-·_:,,-/"-~,¡. > Z'" >'C ';;:")~:ç\1"'~';"" "1""" v ,,"'0 ~.. l" '...) CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: .Ubject: 8/24/87 Council Meeting Date: Request of Rufe Snow Village Partnership and PS 87-28 Kroger Company for Replat ot Lots lR througn ~K, and 6 ~genda Number: Block 1, Northland Shopping Center Addition. This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lots 2R through 5R and 6, Block 1, Northland Shopping Center Addition. The property is the existing shopping center located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive south of Watauga Road. The shopping center is currently being expanded to include a Coast to Coast Hardware Store. In the development of the new business the applicants wish to create a separate lot for the hardware store location. The proposed replat will realign the existing lot lines to accomplish this purpose. All of the Staff comments have been satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: ,/ The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Replat of Lots 2R through 5R and 6, Block 1, Northland Shopping Center Addition as submitted. e , , Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) a Operating Budget .,0 r Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available -¡¿~ ¡ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director I Page 1 of 1 tjuu I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Page 2 P & Z Minutes August 13, 1987 2. PS 87-28 PS 87-28 APPROVED 3. PZ 87-14 ~- I ( ( Request of Rufe Snow Village Partnership and The Kroger Company for replat of Lots 2R thru 5R & 6, Block 1, Northland Shopping Center Addition. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 87-28. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Ike Harris & Company to rezone Tract 16E, W. W. Wallace Su~ /-, ,// Abstract 1606, from its present / classification of R-3 Single Fa ï1y tö R-8 Single Family Detached Ze 0 Lot Line. This property is loc ed south of Emerald Hills Way and st of Grapevine Highway. Chairman Bowen open the Public Hearing and calle for those wishing to speak in fav of this request to please come fa ward. .- Attorney Gorge Staples came forward to repre ent the applicant. He stated there 18 plus acres which lies sout of Emerald Hills Way. He said th Master Plan shows two oroughfares, one at the top and one at the bottom of this property. Mr. Staples stated that part of this property is in the flood plain and there would have to- be some extensive channel work done. He said they plan to put a concrete channel to the south and west. Mr. Staples stated the "Windsor Park" development is owned by his client and this development will be similar to it. He said they are asking for R-8 zoning for the lot size. Mr. Staples stated the City will participate in building the channel since the property is adjacent to a City Park. He said it would cost the developer $6,000 for the concrete channel without the bridge and the only way they could see any return would be to have this zoning. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( FA PEARCE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers July 31, 1987 G.N. 83-046 Wanda Calvert, Planning and Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Re:PS 87-28 Dear Mrs. Calvert: Transmitted herewith are ten (10) prints of the proposed Replat and one (1) print each of the construction drawings of Lots 2R through 5R and Lot 6, Block 1, Northland Shopping Center Addition, submitted in accordance with your instructions. The following revisions and/or corrections have been made in compliance with the City Engineer's comments dated July 27, 1987: 1 . Right-of-way on Watauga Road acquired by the City, recorded in volume 8685, Page 366, has been shown. as 2. Dimensions from centerline of street rights-of-way property corners have been shown. to 3. Water and sanitary sewer services for Lot 6, Block are shown on the "Water & ~an~tary Sewer Layout" a utility easement has been provided. 1 and -- Respectfully submitted, PEARCE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. t ~a ~ c-< - ------------~------------- Robert L. Pearce, P.E. President 1820 HWY 35E · SUITE 102 . CARROLL TON, TEXAS 75006 . 214/245-3568 I ~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I" I ( ( City of Xbrth Richland Hills, Texas July 27, 1987 REF: PWM-0054-87 Memo to: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Gregory W. Dickens, P.E. Asst. Director Public Works/Utilities Subject: PS 87-28; NORTHLAND SHOPPING CENTER ADDITION; Lot 6 & Lots 2R-5R, Block 1 Replat & Plans We have reviewed the referenced preliminary materials and offer the following comments. 1. Right-of-way on Watauga Road acquired by the city has not been shown. The acquired right-of-way is filed in Volume 8685, Page 366 of the Deed Record of Tarrant County, Texas. 2. Show dimensions from centerline of street rights-of-way to existing and proposed property corners. 3. All water and sanitary sewer services for Lot 6, Block 1 should be clearly shown on the "Water & Sanitary Sewer Layout". All services should be tapped off the public mains within Lot 6 or in a public utility easement that overlaps onto Lot 6. The services should not cross another lot. .. /pm cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Richard Royston, Director Development (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 76118 -~:'-'~:, ~:-~/-~.:~- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Administration 8/24/87 RecuJl~ i uer d L i VII V r R~yue~ t lJ r 5th Avellue ò; nett-es Council Meeting Date: for Variance to the Sign Ordinance SO 87-7 Agenda Number: Mr. Richard Amoedo, owner of 5th Avenue Dinettes, 8230 Bedford-Euless Road, is asking for a variance to the Sign Ordinance to allow him to install a ground sign at the north end of the complex. The Sign Ordinance, Ordinance No. 1436, Section 4.2(a), prohbits him from having the sign due to the fact that Mr. Amoedo already has a free standing pole sign for his business on the south end of the complex. The complex has 170 feet of street frontage which will allow only one sign either ground or pole to be in place. Recommendation: Denial of Variance to the Sign Ordinance - . Finance Review Accl. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~~ ity Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 . ,,'; > ',,, '. """ ,..,........~ '" ....-. '....." ..".~.,...,. """, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ,~ - Council Meeting Date: 8/24/87 Board, Ordinance No. 1477 Agenda Number: GN 87-78 This Ordinance establishes the newly approved method of nomination and appointment to this Board. Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 1477 _/- -- Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~perating e ~ther Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available þ~ /J. _ _'/f/~~ . Finance Director City Manager Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie, I ORDINANCE NO. 1477 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. Ordinance No. 316 and Ordinance No. 1140 be, and are hereby, repealed. 2. The Parks and Recreation Commission established by Ordinance No. 316 shall be known as the Park and Recreation Board, and is hereby _~ reestablished by this ordinance. 3. The Park and Recreation Board of the City shall consist of seven (7) members, each of whom shall be a resident of the City. Each member shall serve in a designated place numbered one (1) through seven (7). The following persons, presently serving, shall have the following place designation: , Place 1 Place 2 Place 3 , Place 4 , Place 5. Places six (6) and seven (7) shall be appointed pursuant to the terms of this ordinance. The terms of office shall be for two years except for the first appointments made to comply with this ordinance. Terms shall run from September 15th and expire on September 15th. The terms of those persons serving or appointed to odd numbered places shall expire in odd numbered years. The terms of those persons serving or appointed to even numbered places shall expire in even numbered years. All members shall serve without compensation. Vacancies shall be filled in the same manner as set out above. 4. The City Council Member elected to the City Council Place corresponding to the board member's number shall be responsible for nominating the person to serve in such place on the Park and Recreation Board. The nomination ~ a particular Council Member shall be subject to I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Ordinance No. 1477 Page 2 approval of a majority of the City Council, so that the composite board shall be appointed by the City Council. The Board shall elect its own chairperson annually with the term ending on September 15th. 5. The Board shall act in an advisory capacity to advise the City Council and City Manager concerning the acquisition, development, maintenance and use of parks, playgrounds and open spaces in the City and shall conduct its business at such times and under such rules and regulations as it may prescribe. It shall be the duty of the Board to immediately and at all times thereafter make continuous study of the needs of the City for the establishment of public parks and recreation facilities, to investigate and recommend the locations or sites at which public parks and recreation facilities should be made available within the_, municipal limits, suggest means of acquiring and developing such facilities and furnish the City Council and City Manager with over-all plans for development and improvement of all such facilities and to report to the City Council and City Manager the results of its studies, recommendations, and plans. In the performance of these duties said Board shall act in an advisory capacity. It is specifically provided that said Board shall have no authority to spend nor to commit the City of the expenditure of any funds or monies whatsoever, except under the specific authorization and direction of the City Council and City Manager. 6. The Board shall hold regular monthly meetings at which time and place as it may fix, and such special meetings as may be called by the Chairman or at the request of any two (2) members of the Board. The Board is hereby authorized to provide for the election of a Vice-Chairman, who shall preside in the absence of the Chairman, and is further authorized to prescribe suçh rules and regulations governing its own proceedings _as it may deem advisable. 7. Should any section or part of this ordinance be held to be invalid for any reason, such holding shall not be construed as affecting the validity of any other section or part thereof, it being the intent that the remainder of any such part or part hereof shall stand, notwithstanding the invalidity of any section or part hereof. 8. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its day of passage and, approval. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie. I Ordinance No. 1477 Page 3 PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of August, 1987. ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND lEGALITY: Attorney Mayor " ,.....",.,. "'""i""'Þ.". ,. ;or" ."!""'.... ......,'. .~ . . ,.. .,.",..... I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I D t t Administration epar men : -SUbject: Library Board, Ordinance No. 1478 C ., M · D 8/24/87 - ouncl eetlng ate: GN 87-79 Agenda Number: This Ordinance establishes the newly approved method of nomination and appointment to this Board. Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 1478 Finance Review _Acct. Number ------ Sufficient Funds Avai lable K:1f~ , City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director ;1~ Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1478 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. Ordinance No. 324, Ordinance No. 327 and Ordinance No. 423 are hereby repealed. 2. The Library Commission established by Ordinance No. 324 shall be known as the Library Board and such Board is hereby reestablished. 3. The Library Board of the City shall consist of seven (7) members, each of whom shall be a resident of the City. Each member shall serve in a designated place numbered one (1) through seven (7). The following persons, presently serving, shall have the following place designation: Place 1 Place 2 Place 3 Place 4 Place 5. Places six (6) and seven (7) shall be appdinted pursuant to the terms of this ordinanëe. The terms of office shall be for two years except for the first appointments made to comply with this ordinance. Terms shall run from September 15th and expire on September 15th. The terms of those persons serving or appointed to odd numbered places shall expire in odd numbered years. The terms of those persons serving or appointed to even numbered places shall expire in even numbered years. All members shall serve without compensation. Vacancies shall be filled in the same manner as set out herein. 4. The City Council Member elected to the City Council Place corresponding to the board member's number shall be responsible for nominating the person to serve in such place on the Library Board. The nomination by a particular Council Member shall be subject to approval of a majority of the City Council, so that the composite board shall be appointed by the City Council. The Board shall elect its own chairperson annually with the term ending on September 15th. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I ,I I I I Ie I Ordinance No. 1478 Page 2 5. The Board shall act in an advisory capacity to the Mayor and City Council and shall also act in an administrative capaci~ under the supervision of the City Council in carrying out the Council's instructions, directings, and policy with reference to the needs and necessities of the library. it shall be the duty of the Board to immediately and at all times thereafter make continuous study of the needs of the City for the establishment of public library facilities, to investigate and determine the location of a public Library and determine the type of needs of library facilities, suggest means of acquiring and developing such facilities and furnish the City Council with over-all plans and specifications for development and improvement of all such facilities and to report to the City Council the result of its studies, recommendations, plans and specifications into effect, but only upon the specific approval and under the specific directions of the Council. In the performance of these duties- said Board shall act in an administrative capacity and is hereby given such specific authority as may be required in carrying out the directions, orders and general policy of the City Council, and in carrying out these duties said Board is hereby authorized to employ such personnel as may be required. It is, nevertheless, there specifically provided that said Board shall have no authority to spend nor to commit the City to the expenditure of any funds or monies whatsoever, except under the specific authorization and direction of the City Council. 6. The Board shall hold regular meetings at such time and place as it may fix, and such special meetings as may be called by the Chairman or at the request of any two (2) members of the board The Board is hereby authorized to provide for the election of a Vice-Chairman, who shall preside in the absence of the Chairman, and is further authorized to prescribe such rules and regulations governing its own proceedings _~s it may deem advi~able. 7. Should any section or part of this ordinance be held to be invalid for any reason, such holding shall not be construed as affecting the validity of any other section or part thereof, it being the intent that the remainder of any such or part hereof shall stand, notwithstanding the invalidity of any such section or part hereof. 8. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from date of passage and approval. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Ordinance No. 1478 Page 3 PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of August, 1987. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND lEGALITY: Attorney for the City - . ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance 8/24/87 Revenue Sharing Budget Hearing Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: GN 87-80 Federal Revenue Sharing guidelines require that a budget hearing be held prior to enactment of the budget. Notices were published in the official newspaper on August 14 and August 16, 1987. The following is proposed to be used as a guideline in conducting the public hearing: 1. The proposed use as determined at Council Meeting 7/27/87 of Revenue Sharing Funds remaining from previous years allotment and interest earnings to date is as follows: A. General Government (City Secretary's Office) Funds to be used to retain a records management consultant to establish an official policy and procedures for retaining official public records and purchase required equipment and supplies. $27,000 B. Public Safety (Fire Department) Funds to be used to convert one modular ambulance unit to a diesel chassis. 22,000 C. Public Works (Streets) Funds to be used to obtain a new sign machine and an epoxy button machine. 19,700 Total $68,700 2. Open public hearing allowing all interested citizens to speak pro or con. 3. Close public hearing after all citizens have been given the opportunity to speak. Recommendation It is recommended that the budget hearing be closed. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) opera22et - Ot~ ~ . a.........e...,,-cL.-- Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I Finance Director Page 1 of ,.. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Adopting Supplemental Revenue Sharing Budget :tor ~·1.sca.L Year l~t:Só/t:S/, Urd1.nance IF 14t:Sl Finance Council Meeting Date: 8/24/87 Agenda Number: GN 87- 81 In accordance with Revenue Sharing guidelines a Proposed-Use Hearing was held on July 27, 1987 and a Budget Hearing was held on August 24, 1987 in order to discuss the proposed Supplemental Revenue Sharing Budget for 1986-87. City Council set Monday, August 24, 1987, as the date for final budget adoption. Recommendation Approve Ordinance Number 1481. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ 7l7~~ ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I Finance Director Page 1 of I I (' I I I I I I lilt I I I I I I I (I. I , ORDINANCE NO. 1481 WHEREAS, the City Council has held public hearings to determine the proposed use of Supplemental Federal Revenue Sharing funds for the period of October 1, 1986 to September 30, 1987; and WHEREAS, after receiving public input and after considering all eligible uses the Council finds that the Revenue Sharing Budget Expenditures should be as set out below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The total funds remaining from previous years allotment and interest earnings are: $68,700. 2. The funds in said budget are appropriated for the following uses: A. General Government (City Secretary) B. Public Safety (Fire Department) C. Public Works (Streets Department) $27,000 22,000 19,700 $68,700 PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of August, 1987. Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Rex Mc Entire - Attorney I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: .Ubject: Municipal Court Council Meeting Date: 08/24/87 Agenda Number: GN-87-82 Increase in Municipal Court fines and fees Ordinance No. 1482 This ordinance is in accordance with S.B. 515 and H.B. 1294 recently passed by the Texas State Legislature and authorizes cities to assess a $10.00 fee. This ordinance authorizes the city to increase the limit on Municipal Court fines. This law amends Article 1011 R.C.S. and Article 4.14, Code of Criminal Procedures, to increase the amount of maximum fine that may be imposed by the Municipal Court for certain offenses. For violations of municipal ordinances that govern fire, safety, zoning, and public health and sanitation other than vegetation and litter violations, the maximum permissable fine is $2,000. The fine in all other cases, including vegetation and litter violations shall not exceed $500.00. However, if a motor vehicle is used in illegal dumping the fine cannot exceed $2,000. - . Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 1482 Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~ A ~ 1-1J~~ . City anager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director ~, Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I P I I I I I I I f I ORDINANCE NO. 1482 BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. The Municipal Court may require the person requesting a Driving Safety Course to pay a fee set by the Court at an amount that does not exceed $10.00 including any special fees authorized by Statute or Municipal Ordinance to cover the cost of administering this section. Fees collected under this subsection by the Municipal Court shall be deposited in the Municipal Treasury. 2. The Municipal Court shall require a payment of $10.00 fee before dismissing proceedings under subsection (a) of Sec. lC of Article 670lh, Vernon's Civil Statutes (Failure to Maintain Financial Responsibility). The fee collected shall be deposited in the Municipal Treasury and used to defray expenses in administering the terms of said Sec. lC. 3. The City Council adopts the powers conferred by the 1987 Amendment to Article 4.4 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and the 1987 Amendment to Article 1011, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas. The Municipal Court of this city shall have the powers to punish by a fine not to exceed $2,000.00 upon conviction of a violation of city ordinances that govern fire safety, zoning and public health and sanitation other than vegetation and litter violation. The fine in all other cases, including vegetation and litter violation shall not exceed $500.00. However, if a motor vehicle is used in illegal dumping, a conviction for said illegal dumping is punishable by a fine not to exceed $2,000.00. 4. .- All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict therewith, are 'repealed to the extent of said conflict. 5. If any portion of this ordinance is declared to be invalid it shall not affect the remaining valued portion. 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its date of passage, approval and publication. I· Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I Passed and approved this ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney -. day of , 1987. Mayor -~i~-"'~::,--::'~ ~ -'. epartment: Finance CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ,., C ., M t· D 8/24/87 - ouncl ee Ing ate: Agenda Number: GN 87 -83 SUbject: User Fees - Ordinance No. 1485 Based on the results of the General Fund Fee Analysis performed by Lewis F. McLain, Jr., Administrative and Fiscal Consulting Service, Inc. and adjustments as tentatively approved by the City Council (see detail, attached), Ordinance No. 1485 is proposed. The ordinance outlines charges for the following services: Building Permits, Sprinkler System Permits, Fire Investigation Fees, Special Vendors Permits, Planning and Zoning Fees, Park and Recreation Fees, Library Charges, Special Police Department charges and Special Fire Department charges. The effective date for the Parks and Recreation, Library and Building Permit fees is August 24, 1987. The remaining become effective on October 1, 1987. Under the new ordinance, commercial building permit fees will be set based on values calculated using the Building Valuation Data Sheet (see Exhibit IIAII). Currently new construction permit fees are based on the value provided by the contractor. Based on a review of permit fees, it appears that the valuations provided by the contractors are often understated, resulting in lost revenues to the City. With the acceptance and use of the Building Valuation Data Sheet, fair and equitable permit fees will be assessed on all new construction within our City, while keeping the same fee structure. The tenant finish-out charges under the building permits section assumes a valuation of $10.00 per foot of leased space. Currently, the charges are assessed based on the valuation provided by the contractor. As with the new construction building permits, the fees assessed to contractors will be fair and equitable to all contractors. Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 1485. - . Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other 4- /4 -- - Acct. Number S~fi~S 77l - pI(2 ~ City Manager . Finance Director ·1 Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I .. . I I I I I I I , I I I I I I II I I -. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ,." PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS TO USER FEE REVENUES Adjusted Preliminary Per Estimates Workshop Difference Parks & Recreation $ 31,197 $ 24,197 ($ 7,000) Library Fees 26,800 23,860 ( 2,940) Non Resident Fees -0- 1,800 + 1,800 Planning & Development 10,565 10,565 -0- Environmental Services 85,500 85,500 -0- Vehicle Impoundment Fees 30,000 16,200* ( 13,800) Fire A. Fire Inspection 99,400 -0- ( 99,400) B. Plan Review 27,260 -0- ( 27 ,260) C. Professional Licenses 6,000 -0- ( 6,000) D. Certification Schools 25,550 27,850 + 2,300 E. Sprinkler System Permits 8,535 8,535 -0- F. Investigations 2,000 2,000 -0- G. Itinerant Vendors 10,000 10,000 -0- H. New Building Valuation Rendition 91,819 91,819 -0- I. Tenant Finish-Out Valuation Rendition -0- 15,000** + 15,000 Franchise Tax 145,000 145,000 -0- Payment in lieu of Tax 107,800 ' 107,800 -0- Ambulance Fees -0- 22 , 600' + 22,600 $707,426 $592,726 ($114,700) --------- ======== ========== -------- * Vehicle Impoundment Fees were originally estimated at $15.00 per day per vehicle. The final report as submitted to City Council at the budget workshop indicated a recommended fee of $10.00 per day. ** Tenant Finish-Out Valuation Rendition assumes a flat $10.00 per foot of leased space to complete the leased area. The estimated value lost because of the inconsistent values rendered by contractors ranged from $1.00 to $150.00 per foot last fiscal year. The estimated value lost last fiscal year is approximately $30,000. But in keeping with our conservative approach in projecting revenues this next fiscal year the estimate is $15,000. I .. Ie I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I -- I I . , ORDINANCE NO. 1485 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The charges set out herein shall be made by this City for the services provided. Building Permits. A. New Construction 2. The bUilding permit fee shall be based upon the formula set out in the Uniform Building Code as shown by Building Valuation Data dated October 1986, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit IIAII, and made a part hereof as if set out verbatim. Based upon the calculation of value from Exhibit IIAII, the fees shan be those fees shown on Exhibit liB II , attached hereto, and made a part hereof the same as if set out verbatim. Separate fees shall be charged for building permit fees and mechanical permit fees pursuant to the formula established herein. B. Tenant Finish-Out. The building permit fee shall be based on a minimum cost of $10.00 per square foot of leased space. 3. Permit Fees for Sprinkler S~stems. Permits shall be required for sprinkler systems and the followlng permit fee shall be charged~ - Systems are valued at $1.00 per square foot of coverage and the permit fee shall be: $ 1.00 - $ 500.00........ 501.00 - 2,001.00........ 2,001.00 - 25,000.00........ 25,001.00 - 50,000.00........ 50,001.00 - 100,000.00........ 100,001.00 - 500,000.00........ 500,001.00 - 1,000,000.00........ 1,000,001.00 - & over.............. $ 15.00 15.00 + $2.00/1,000 (over minimum) 45.00 + $9.00/1,000 (over minimum) 252.00 + $6.50/1,000 (over minimum) 414.50 + $4.50/1,000 (over minimum) 639.50 + $3.50/1,000 (over minimum) 2,039.50 + $3.00/1,000 (over minimum) 3,539.50 + $2.00/1,000 (over minimum) A $60.00 permit fee shall be charged for alterations to existing sprinkler systems. l- Ie I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I II I I Ordinance No. 1485 Page 2 4. Fire Investigation Fee. Permits are required for intentional burning, blasting and fireworks displays. The sum of $200.00 shall be made for each permit. Fireworks displays sponsored by the City shall be exempt. 5. Special Vendors. Seasonal or temporary vendors with places of business located upon private property, including but not limited to Christmas tree lots and mall vendors, must procure a Special Vendor's License from the City. The following charges shall be made: One week permit.................... $ 35.00 Over one week to one month......... 100.00 Over one month..................... 150 .00 6. Planning & Zoning Fees. All applications for rezoning shall be accomplished by payment of a $300.00 fee. Variance and exception fees are hereby set at $100.00 for residential and $175.00 for nonresidential. Multi-family property shall be deemed nonresidential. Platting fees shall be based upon the charges set out in Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof the same as if set out verbatim. 7. Park and Recreation Fees. The fo 11 owi ng renta 1 fees sha 11 be cha rged for use of City__ facilities: :. Class Rooms: 500 - 1,000 sq. ft. ...... 1,000 - 1,800 sq. ft. ...... 1,801 - and above........... $10.00 first two hours; $5.00 for each additional hour or part thereof $18.00 first two hours; $9.00 for each additional hour or part thereof $35.00 first two hours; $18.00 for each additional hour or part thereof. (Nonresidents will be charged a minimum of 3 hours) Kitchen.................... . Gym n a s i urn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Security deposit (for Kitchen re n tal ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25.00 per hour 15.00 per hour for half court 30.00 per hour for full court 100.00 I · -- I I I I I I I f I I I I I I re I I Ordinance No. 1485 Page 3 Community Center Annual User Fees: Individual Patron Resident.................. Nonresident............... Fami ly Group Resident.................. 2.00 per person 5.00 per perso'n 10.00 per family 20.00 per family 1.00 per card 1.00 per person Nonresident............... lost Card fee................ Temporary Use - Single...... The balance of the fees for teams, leagues, tournaments, classes and related activities shall be established by the Director, subject to approval of the City Manager, based upon number of participants, length of use of facilities, type of activity, need for use of city personnel, perils, dangers and other cost facts. B. library Charges. Library cards shall be used free of charge to City rpsidents and residents of Watauga. A $10.00 charge shall be made for all others. Book Replacement Charges: (lost or damaged) Actual cost of the book plus a $10.00 administration fee. Fines and Processing Charges for Overdue Books: 10¢ per day up to the cost of the book, plus $2.50 imposed as administration fee upon second notice. 9. Speçial Police Department Charges~ Veh i c 1 e Impoundment and Storage............ Towing fee Base Charge Wrecker Pulls (Normal)... Additional Charges to Base Charge: Use of Doll ies..................... $ 10.00 per day 45.00 25.00 60.00 15.00 75.00 Winching/Waiting/Standby Hourly Rate (15 Minute Increments)...... Drop Drive Shaft................... Pulls 1 1/2 ton and greater........ Waiting time first fifteen minutes, No Charge Animal Control: Euthanasia fee Res ide n t · · · · · · · · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 . 00 Nonresident......................... 20.00 I· - I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I ~ Ordinance No. 1485 Page 4 Environmental Services: Permit fees for Food Service Establishments (Annual Permit) 1 - 5 employees.................... $150.00 6 - 20 employees.................... 250.00 21 or more employees................ 300.00 Reinspection fee...................... 25% of annual fee (A new fee shall be charged upon change in ownership) Temporary (up to 14 days)............. 50.00 Certification of Food Service Managers 10.00 10. Special Fire Department Charges Basic Certification School................. $375.00 per student EMT School................................. 150.00 per student (no charge for NRH firefighters) Ambulance Services: Resident Nonresident Local $ 80.00 220.00 Distant $120.00 280.00 Plus itemized charges for mileage, drugs and expendable supplies. 11. The Park and Recreation fees, the Library fees, and Building Permit fees shall be in full force and effect from and after August 24, 1987. - - 12. All other fees established herein shall be in full force and effect from and after October 1, 1987. 13. If any fee established herein is in conflict with any other ordinance. then in such event. this ordinance shall govern. 14. This ordinance is not intended to affect fees not specifically addressed herein and all other fees heretofore established shall remain in full force and effect. I· Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I -. I I Ordinance No. 1485 Page 5 PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of August, 1987. ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City - - Mayor ..I, -'.. -, . ' ........ . .:~ ~ -- .: ~ . .-. .. . .Ie· I.. I.. 1 1 1 1. APARTMENT HOUSES: ·Type I or II F. R. ............. Type V-Masonry (or Type III) .... . . . . . . . . . . Type V-Wood Frame . . . . . . . Type J-Basement Garage. . . . 2. AUDITORIUMS: Type I or II F. R. ............. Type 1I-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type IIJ-l-Hour ........... 1 Type II J-N . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . {'3. Bl~';'-N ................ -Type I or II F.R. ............. Type II-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type II-N. . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . Type II J-l-Hour .......". . Type IIJ-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-N ................ 4. BOWLING ALLEYS: Type II-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . .. Type II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type IIJ-l-Hour .. . . . . . . . . . Type III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . S. CHURCHES: Type I or II F. R. ............. Type fI-l·Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type IIJ-l-Hour . . .. .. .. . . . Type IIJ-N . . . . . . . . . .'":. . . . . . Type V- l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-N ................ 6. CONVALESCENT HOSPITALS: -Type I or II F. R. ............. Type IIJ-l-Hour ........... Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. DWELLINGS: Type V-Masonry. . . . . . . . . . . Type V-Wood Frame. . . . . . . Basements-- Semi-Finished........... . ,~'I' ·8. FIRE~~~~~~~:· . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type I or II F. R. ............. Type II-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type 1II-1-Hour .. . . . . . . . . . Type IH-N . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-N ................ 9. HOMES fOR THE ELDERLY: Type I or II F. R. ............. Type II-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type II J-l-Hour ........... Type III-N . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvpe V-N ................ 10. HOSPITALS: · Type I or II F. R. ............. Type III-l-Hour ........... Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . I 1 I 1 I I ,. I I EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE NO. 1485 Building Valuation Data Cost per Square foot Good Average S76. 10 62.50 59.40 47.60 56.70 44.90 25.80 73.40 52.80 50.30 56.30 53.60 - 51.80 49.30 102.30 74.60 71.00 84.20 80.10 74.60 71.10 31.40 29.90 34.40 32.80 31.50 69.40 52.30 49.80 - . 56.00 53.40 51.20 48.70 96.30 68.80 63.00 69.00 49.30 65.60 46.30 16.00 14.10 12.40 1 0.60 78.50 51.90 49.40 57.50 54.80 51.80 49.30 72.80 58.30 55.60 61.10 58.20 58.50 55.70 11 2.30 94.00 87.60 · Add 0.5 percent to total cost for each story over three. At the request of numerous building officials, Building Standards offers the following building valuation data representing average costs {or most buildings. Because residential buildings are the most common for many cit- ies, two general classes are considered (or these, one (or "average" construction and the other for "good." Adjust- ments should be made for special architectural or struc- . tural features and location of the project. Otten higher or lower unit costs may result. The unit costs are intended to comply with the defini- tion of "valuation" in Section 423 of the Uniform Build- ing Code and thus include architectural, structural, elec- trical, plumbing, and mechanical work, except as specifically listed below. It also indudes the contractor's profit which should not be omitted. The determination of plan check fees for projects re- viewed by the International Conference of Building Of- ficials will be based on valuation computed from these figures. October, 1986 Occupancy and Type 11. HOTELS AND MOTELS: -Type I or II E R. ............. Type III-l-Hour .. . . . . . . . . . Type III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-N ................ 12. INDUSTRIAL PLANTS: Type I or II F. R. ............. Type II-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type II--{Stock) ............ Type III-l-Hour .. . . . . . . . . . Type III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ti It -u p . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-N ................ 13. JAILS: Type I or II F. R. ............. Type 1I1-1-Hour ... . . . . . . . . Type V-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . 14. LIBRARIES: Type I or II F. R. ............. Type II-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type IIJ-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . Type III-N . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-N ................ 15. MEDICAL OFFICES: ·Type I or II E R. ............. Type II-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type II-N. . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . Type 1II-1-Hour .. . . . . . . . . . Type III-N . . .. . . . .. ... . . . . . Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-N ................ 16. OFFICES:"· -Type I or II F. R. ............. Type 1I-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type 1I1-1-Hour .......... . Type III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-N ................ 17. PRIVATE GARAGES: Wood Frame. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Masonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , Open Carports . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18. PUBLIC BUilDINGS: Type I or II E R. ............. Type 1I-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type 1IJ-1-Hour .. . . . . . . . . . Type III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-N ................ 19. PUBLIC GARAGES: -Type I or II ER. ............. Type II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type III-l-Hour ........... Type III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . 20. RESTAURANTS: Type III-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . Type III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-N ................ 21. SCHOOLS: Type I or II F.R. ............. Type 1I-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type 1I1-1-Hour .. . . . . . . . . . Type III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . 22. SERVICE STATIONS: Type II-t'\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type 1I1-1-Hour .. . . . . . . . . . Type V-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Canopies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23. STORES: -Type I or II F. R. ............. Type II-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type II-N. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type 1I1-1-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . Type III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . Type V-N ................ 24. THEATERS: Tvp<.' I or II f. R, .. , . . . . . . . . . . TVJx' 111-- I· Hour . . . . . . . . . . . Tvp(' IIJ-N . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . Tvp(' V-l-Hour . . . . . . . . . . . . TYIX'V-N ...... _ . . . . . . . . . ... Deduct 20 percent for shell only buildings. 111. 50 102.30 73.20 81.50 57.40 54.70 62.40 59.40 56.50 53.80 84.40 62.40 59.50 68.20 65.00 63.50 60.50 74.10 48.90 46.60 53.20· 50.70· 49.70 47.40 16.50 19.50. 11 .40 87.60 65.80 62.70 73.70 70.20 65.30 62.20 34.10 19.70 23.80 22.70 20.70, 66.80 63.70 59.20 56.30 78.60 50.20 57.60 54.90 52.90 46.80 47.00 41.10 18.00 57.60 35.80 34.10 42.00 40.00 33.60 32.00 ;'7.00 5h.20 S L50 5 1 . 00 48.bO 71.20 62.80 59.80 54.70 52.10 39.80 27.70 26.40 30.40 28.90 20.00 27.70 26.40 25. WAREHOUSES:-· Type I or II F. R. ............. Type II or V-1-Hour . . . . . . . . Type II or V-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type III-l-Hour .. . . . . . . . . . Type III-N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EQUIPMENT AIR CONDITIONING: Commercial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Residential ......-.......... SPRINKLER SYSTEMS. . . . . . . . . . . . 33.90 20.00 19.00 23.50 22.40 2.80 2.40 1.30 Regional Modifiers The following modifiers are recommended for use in conjunction with the Building Valuation Data. In addi. tion, certain local conditions may require further modifi- cations. To use these modifiers merely multiply the listed cost per square foot by the appropriate regional modifier. For example: To adjust cost of a Type 1II-1-Hour library building of average construction for the Utah area, select Regional Modifier 0.78 and unit cost from Valuation Data. S62.40. 0.78 x $62.40 = $48.67 (adjusted cost per square foot) Eastern United States Connecticut. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . District of Columbia .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Florida ............................ Georg i a. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New Hampshire ................... New Jersey. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New York New York City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other ...................... North Carolina. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pennsylvania Ph i ladelphia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gther ...................... Rhode Island ...................... South Carolina. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vermont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vi rg i n i a. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . West Virginia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Central United States Alabama. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Arkansas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · Illinois............................ I nd i a na . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :-. . . . . . . . . . . . Kansas ........................... Kentucky ......................... Lou i s i ana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M i chi ga n ......................... Minnesota ........................ Mississippi... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nebraska . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . North Da kota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oh io . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oklahoma ........................ South Dakota. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tennessee......................... . Texas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wisconsin ........................ Western United States A I a s ka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Arizona. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . California Los Angeles ................. San Francisco. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other .................. . . . . Colorado ......................... Hawaii. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ida h o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Montana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nevada. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New Mexico ....................:. Oregon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Uta h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Washington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wyoming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. Deduct 11 percent for mini-warehouses. Modifier 0.91 0.84 0.87 0.i6 0.70 0.80 0.80 0.91 0.80 0.93 1.10 0.86 0.70 0.95 0.85 0.91 0.70 0.79 0.74 0.82 " .- "- a: ~ ...; 5 ~ < ¿ ~ C 0::- < C Z ;! ~ ç z ëS -' 5 c:: 0.73 0.71 0.87 0.83 0.81 0.75 0.78 0.78 0.85 0.87 0.i3 0.79 0.76 0.81 0.84 0.74 0.79 0.73 0.75 0.84 49 1.27 0.84 1.00 í .11 0.96 0.82 1. 16 0.82 0.79 0.89 0.76 0.84 0.i8 0.89 0.81 I II I I I I I I I f I I I I I I ,. I I 4 EXHIBIT IIBII TO ORDINANCE NO. 1485 FEE SCHEDULE BUILDING $ 1 - $ 500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $15 .00 501 - 2,000................ $15.00 for the first $500 plus $2.00 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000 2,001 - 25,000................ $45.00 for the first $2,000 plus $9.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000 25,001 - 50,000................ $252.00 for the first $25,000 plus $6.50 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000 50,001 - 100,000................ $414.50 for the first $50,000 plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000 100,001 - 500,000................ $639.50 for the first $100,000 plus $3.50 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000 500,001 - 1,000,000................ $2,039.50 for the first $500,000 plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000 1,000,000 and up..................... $3,539.50 for the first $1,000,000 plus $2.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof ADD 65% TO COMMERCIAL ONLY FOR PLAN REVIEW FEE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MECHANICAL Monetary Value of Proposed Work Base plus Percentage of Estimated Cost $ 0 - $ 500 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 501 - 1 ,500. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,501 - 3,000................... 3 ,001 - 5 ,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,001 - 50,000................... 50,001 - 100,000................... 100,001 - 500,000................... $ 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 0.00 + .009 100.00 + .008 200.00 + .006 $700.00 + .004 500,001 or more.................... I, Ie I I I I I I I f I I I I I I -. I I .. EXHIBIT "C" TO ORDINANCE NO. 1485 Plat filing fees shall be established at One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($120.00) per plat plus One Dollar and fifty cents ($1.50) per lot residential and Five Dollars ($5.00) per acre for nonresidential areas other than parks for which no fee is required. Inspection and laboratory fees shall be established as follows: A three (3) per cent inspection fee will be paid by the developer for all public improvements in all single-family residential subdivisions. On other than single-family residential subdivisions the fee shall be based on the following: Three (3) per cent on all public improvements or Nine Dollars ($9.00) per acre, whichever is the greater of the two (2). When any laboratory test shows a condition which does not meet specifications, the developer shall pay for all tests required by the city's inspector to determine that the failing condition has been corrected. Preliminary Plat $120.00 plus $5.00 per acre or $1.50 per lot $120.00 plus $5.00 per acre or $1.50 per lot $120.00 plus $5.00 per acre or $1.50 per lot $100.00 Final Plat Replat Street Vacation Easement Vacation $50.00 Street Signs $65.00 per intersection Plats - $15.00; oversized plats -__ $30.00; Covenants - $5.00 per page Recqrding Fee ....---- '~"-:::·~'__:"<.,r~''f;.',-~~:_~ ':,-'i,:- <:;..,;r,~,~ .'-'--,~--\~0?:--.<~':-~,~:, _~<.~ . '. ~ .' "¡'~ .,,~ ", ~:"'·~·f '!"" ....,.. ~. ^'f\'!t·,':.;"~,,..,..·r ·..·,."~'..,v~~;r;""'7ir'!" ." *;'f"".,~1'.·· '~"',., , .' "",,"~ . ,'~..,' '..' ,. þ , "' ',,',..., ... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .epartment: Subject: Administration 8/24/87 .~ - Council Meeting Date: Cable Television Board, Ordinance No. 1480 GN 87-84 Agenda Number: This Ordinance establishes the newly approved method of nomination and appointment to this Board. Recommendation: Approve Ordinance No. 1480 .- Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available K;f1/~~ City Manager , Finance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM .,,~ ,. Page 1 of I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1480 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. Ordinance No. 1143 and Section 29 of Ordinance 797 be and are hereby repealed. 2. There is hereby established a seven place Cable Television Board for the City of North Richland Hills. The function of the Board shall be to monitor the operation of the cable television system to insure compliance with the provisions of enforceable city ordinances dealing with cable television. The board shall handle citizen complaints and be empowered to hold hearings to verify allegations and arbitrate citizen/company differences. In addition, the Board shall aid the cable company in screening applicants for time on the public access channels which are designated for the exclusive use of citizens of North Richland hi"lls. The Board shall act in an advisory capacity to the Mayor, City Council and City Manager with reference to the development, equipping, expansion and operating of the municipal cable channel, currently identified as CITICABLE 36. It shall be the duty of the Board to immediately and all times thereafter make continuous study of the needs of the City for municipal cable TV facilities, to investigate and recommend the location of adequate municipal cable facilities, suggest means of acquiring and developing such facilities and furnish the City Council and City Manager with over-all plans and specifications for development and improvement of a11 such facilities and to report to the City Council and City Manager'the result of its studies, recommendations, plans and' specifications. In the performance of these duties said Board shall act in an advisory capacity. It is, nevertheless, there specifically provided that said Board shall have no authority to spend nor to commit the City to the expenditure of any funds or monies whatsoever, except under the specific authorization and direction of the City Council. 3. The Board shall hold meetings at such time and place as it may fix, and such special meetings as may be called by the Chairman or at the request of any three (3) members of the Board. The Board is hereby authorized to provide for the election of a Vice Chairman, who shall preside in the absence of the Chairman, and is further authorized to prescribe such rules and regulations governing its own proceedings as it may deem advisable. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie, I Ordinance No. 1480 Page Two 4. The Cable Television Board shall consist of seven members, each of whom shall be a resident of the City. Each member shall serve in a designated place numbered one (1) through seven (7). The following persons, presently serving, shall have the following place designations: Place 1 (Tarrant County Junior College Representative) Place 2 Place 3 (Birdville Independent School District Representative) Place 4 (local Clergy) /,- -~ ...---/ Place 5 Place 6 Place 7 The terms of office shall be for two years except for the first appointments made to comply with the terms of this ordinance. Terms shall run from September 15th and expire on September 15th. The terms of those persons serving or appointed to odd numbered places shall expire on September 15th of odd numbered years and the terms for even numbered places shall expire on September 15th of even numbered years. All members shall serve without compensation. Vacancies shall be filled in the same manner as original appointments. Future appointments shall be as follows:- Place 1 from Tarrant County Junior College, Place 2 from the general public, Place 3 from the Birdville. Independent School District, Place 4 from the local clergy and Places 5 through 7 from the general public. 5. The Council person serving in a particular place shall be responsible for nominating the person to serve in the corresponding place on the Board: Council Place 1 Council Place 2 Council Place 3 Council Place 4 Council Place 5 Council Place 6 Council Place 7 Board Place 1 Board Place 2 Board Place 3 Board Place 4 Board Place 4 Board Place 6 Board Place 7. The Board is empowered to elect its own Chairman, for yearly term ending on September 15th of each year. I, Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Ordinance No. 1480 Page Three 6. If any portion of this ordinance should be declared to be invalid it shall not affect the remaining valid portion. 7. This ordinance shall be in full force from and after its passage and approval. Passed this 24th day of August, 1987. Mayor ATTEST: - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City - . , ' " , ,~> }'''''~ ~~ ,-v" > ~ ' .- f'~ .:!' ,':.!i;"\t)~~·~ . , ." < CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Parks and Recreation Department ~ · 8/24/87 ' - Council Meeting Date: Temporary Landscaping - Recreation/Library Facility A N GN 87-86 genda umber: An estimate has been made of the cost of temporary landscaping in the amount of $9,000 for the Recreation/library Facility. All work is to be done by City force account and the materials proposed to be purchased can be utilized in the ultimate landscaping project at a later date. Funds are not presently available and City Council action is requested so that this project can begin. The following purchases are proposed: Concrete Pipe 3 ea. - 48" height X 72" diameter 24 ea. - 3611 height X 4811 diameter 4 ea. - 24" height X 48IJdiameter Plants 10 red bud trees - 2 1/211 diameter 5 chaste trees - 2 1/211/311 diameter 10 yaupon holly - 2 1/2"/311 diameter 6 flowering guince - 5 gallon 124 carolina jasmine - 1 gallon 64 dwarf crepe myrtle - 3 gallon Soil ---r,615 cubic feet of top soil n effort is being made to obtain a donation of some or all of the concrete pipe. To "he extent that effort is successful, the cost of the project will be reduced. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $9,000 from the Reserve For Contingency to the Parks and Recreation Department. -,' Finance Review 01-70-02-2010 --r- Acct. Number S~f~ndS Available ~ / ~f?lz:; ~ City Manager , Finance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM '::k.. Page 1 of 1 r CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Finance epartment: Council Meeting Date: 8/24/87 R~cord Vote-on Proposed 1987~88'Ad Valor~m '-"Tax Rat-e- ~Incre~se ' - Agenda Number: GN 87-87 In accordance with the State Property Tax Code, the City Council must announce the intent to increase the Ad Valorem Tax Rate and take a record vote. The proposed tax rate for the 1987-88 fiscal year is 41.3¢ per $100 valuation, which is an increase of 7.38% above the effective rate calculations as mandated by the State Property Tax Code. There are some remaining issues to be resolved before the adoption of the actual tax rate, which can be done as late as September 28, 1987. It is believed that all necessary changes in the area of additional exemptions and/or reductions in the proposed operating budget can be accomplished within the 41.3¢ rate. The following are unresolved issues growing out of the budget workshops and subsequent staff recommendations: A. Revenues from User Fee Study to be adjusted based on tentative decisions by City Council in the net amount of a $114,700 reduction. B. Optional additional revenues from all establishments that have personnel who handle food would be approximately $20,000. C. Loss in revenue by granting additional 5% Homestead Exemption would be approximately $108,693 D. Possible net adjustments of $104,777 in expenditures to compensate for loss in revenue. E. Proposed one-time purchase of capital items to be appropriated from current year revenues (1986-87) of approximately $98,000 out of a total of $157,808 in capital items proposed for 1987-88. See attached schedules and memos for additional details. These are the recommended guide.lines in discussing the proposed Ad Valorem tax rate increase: 1. Open discussion of the tax rate increase allowing all Council members to speak as desired. 2. Close discussion after all Council members have been given opportunity to speak. 3. Take record vote of intent. 4. If the tentative tax rate is approved, set date of public hearing on proposed tax rate. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other _ /J - ~ '--7J? Co.- ~ Acct. Number SUf~ Available ~ . Finance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ..." Recommendation: It is recommended that: 1. A record vote be taken on the intent to increase Ad Valorem Tax Rate not to exceed 41.3¢ per $100 valuation. 2. September 14, 1987 be set as the public hearing date for the proposed tax increase. 3. September 28, 1987 be set as the date for the actual adoption of the actual tax rate and adoption of the proposed 1987-88 operating budget. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I -. I· I I I I I I t' I I I I I I Ie I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS TO USER FEE REVENUES Adjusted Preliminary Per Estimates Workshop Difference Parks & Recreation $ 31,197 $ 24,197 ($ 7,000) Library Fees 26,800 23,860 ( 2,940) Non Resident Fees -0- 1,800 + 1,800 Planning & Development 10,565 10,565 -0- Environmental Services 85,500 85,500 -0- Vehicle Impoundment Fees ~O,OOO 16,200* ( 13,800) Fire A. Fire Inspection 99,400 -0- ( 99,400) B. Plan Review 27,260 -0- ( 27 , 260) c. Professional Licenses 6,000 -0- ( 6,000) D. Certification Schools 25,550 27,850 + 2,300 E. Sprinkler System Permits 8,535 8,535 -0- F. Investigations 2,000 2,000 -0- G. Itinerant Vendors 10,000 10,00a -0- H. New Building Valuation Rendition 91,819 91,819 -0- ~ I. Tenant Finish-Out Valuation Rendition -0- 15,000** + 15,000 Franchise Tax 145,000 145,000 -0-_ Payment in lieu of Tax ,107,800 107,800 -0- Ambulance Fees -0- 22,600 + 22,600 $707,426 $592,726 ($114,700) -------- -....------ ---------- -------.-- ------.-- ---------- * Vehicle Impoundment Fees were originally estimated at $15.00 per day per vehicle. The final report as submitted to City Council at the budget workshop indicated a recommended fee of $10.00 per day. ** Tenant Finish-Out Valuation Rendition assumes a flat $10.00 per foot of leased space to complete the leased area. The estimated value lost because of the inconsistent values rendered by contractors ranged from $1.00 to $150.00 per foot last fiscal year. The estimated value lost last fiscal year is approximately $30,000. But in keeping with our conservative approach in projecting revenues this next fiscal year the estimate is $15,000. I -- I I I I I .1 I f' I I I I I I lit I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1987-88 BUDGET STATUS AS OF 8-24-87 Revenue Adjustments 1. User Fee Revenue Adjustments per Budget Workshop and Staff Recommendations ($114,700) Optional Revenues not considered at Budget Workshop 1. Food Handlers Annual Certification Program for business establishments that have personnel who handle food. 20,000 Loss in Revenue by Granting additional 5% Homestead Exemption ( 108,693) ($203,393) Net Revenue Adjustments ----------- ----~----- Expenditure Options 1. Proposed one-time purchase of capital items to be appropriated from current year revenues (1986/87) $ 98,616 22,400 75,537 2. Correction of error detected 8-18-87 3. Proposed cut back in travel & training costs 4. Adjustments to various salary accounts Municipal Court 6,840 Total Options $203,393 ======== I' -- I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I -- I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PROPOSED FUNDING CURRENT YEAR REVENUES (1986-87) CAPITAL ITEMS City Secretary $ 3,700 445 1,500 2,149 61,150 16,000 11,669 8,875 52·,320 $157,808 Legal Planning & Development Municipal Court Library Public Works Parks & Recreation Police Fire 1- - ~.~A ~~"- ... -~lÄ-- f I TO FROM 1 1 1 I I I f I 1 I I I I Ie I I INTER-(i)FFICE MEMORANDUM Lee Maness. Finance Director REF: PDM#05/87/526 Pam Burney, ACO Supervisor DATE: August 20. 1987 SUBJECT: Information on Foog Service Program The trend in Food Service Programs is toward training food managers and handlers in safe food handling methods. The Texas Department of Health recommends that cities which operate food service programs should provide both Food Managers and Food Handlers Training Programs. The Food Managers Program consists of a 15 hour course designed to cover the different methods of food safety, as well as detailed information on how to pre- vent food-borne illnesses associated with food service, Managers will -be re- quired to pass an exam to become state and city certified. Several cities. in our area are contracting with a private company to teach this course at city facilities. The company charges the city $20.00 per person. The city charges $50.00 - $60.00 and issues certificates to qualifying managers. There are several situations which would exempt the manager, such as a degree in hotel management, dietetics or successfully passing the national exam. These would pay a lesser fee of $10.00 for city certification. Texas Department of Health also recommends an abbreviated training course of 2 hours to teach basic food safety to the food handlers in the establishment. This training usually consists of a video and brief question and answer period. The average charge for this program is $10.00, which includes a Food Handlers _? Card issued to each person who completes the course. State officials have observed that many managers who attend the managers course comment on the fact that a program is also needed for their employees _ because there is not enough time on the job to train new employees on these safe food handling techniques. These two courses should be required by ordinance. Various cities have both pro- grams, including Farmers Branch, Fort Worth, Temple, Tyler, El Paso and Odessa. Many more in our immediate area have the Food Managers Program and are consider- ing adding the Food Handlers Card Program to complete their training program. Of the identified 250 establishments each would be required to have, on staff, one Certified Food Manager. This would require certifying 250 Food Managers. Using eight as the average number of employees per establishment, would require approximately 2,000 Food Handlers Cards to be issued. The revenue generated by these two certification programs would help offset the total cost of the Food Service Program. Respectfully, ~c¿Z -~ ~~ ;p/~~~ Pam Burney I ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works Council Meeting Date: 8-24-87 Approval of a Payment to James & Sheryl Bellomy in the amount of $~1,677.11 - Right-of-Way on Hightower Drive Agenda Number: PAY 87-4 At the Council· Meeting on August 10, 1987, the Council approved a payment of right-of-way to three (3) other people along Hightower Drive. At this time it was mentioned that there was one (1) other owner that had not signed the right-of-way document at that time, and it would be placed on the agenda at a later time. This is the last right-of-way document that we will need in order to construct Hightower from the new box culvert that drains water into Morgan Meadows back to the east to the existing Hightower Drive in Briarwood, :Estates . Recommendation: To approve the payment of ~1,677.11 to James Bellomy & wife Sheryl for a portion of right-of-way along Hightower Drive. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other -.GíL , Finance Director Department Head Signat e CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of Department: ~ ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works Council Meeting Date: 8-24-87 Right-ai-Way Purchase on Hightower Drive Agenda Number: PAY-87-5 At the present time the City of North Richland Hills is installing a 16" water main along a portion of Hightower Drive near Little Ranch Road. While installing this water line we discovered we could not stay in the right-of- way and needed to install this line on property owned by Mr. B. J. Fanning and his wife. Since this part of Hightower Drive will be widened in the future,. the staff thought it would 'be best to proceed to purchase right- of-way rather than purchasing an easement for the water line. The total square footage being purchased is approximately 5,508 square feet. Mr. Fanning has agreed to accept one (1) dollar a square foot for this right- of-way and this is the same amount we paid for right-of-way further east on Hightower Drive. Recommendation To approve the payment of $5,508.00 to Mr. B. J. Fanning and wife Mary for the portion-of right-o~-way for Hightower Drive. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~ Operating Budget Other, J:je -41'- Q...- Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . mance Director Page 1 of