The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1986-01-27 Agendas I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,,~.',·.····",:,···:··:·,·,I ~,; :C'J I '~:i>1 ::,,:',,·:,s.:. '~s':;", ~""I ,,:,..;,.,....:......:,.. ':,'<~- ~I' W:,...."'..;¡".,,..:,",,'. , :~": ":_>.;t ~: ":'.,~'-.:~"':~--_~~~~"'f"'?'::i;<:""':. -- ,. .".,_,<_,-, - ~\"I'!,~' >"~é'<"~~';'C":""H ;"" ~':'f' ::,,-, "" "'. ,~' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA JANUARY 27, 1986 - 6:30 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Mayor's Hall of Fame (Councilwoman Moody) 2. Proposed Federal Tax Reforms that Impact the City (Mr. Harold McInroe, First Southwest Corporation) 3. R-8 Zoning Issues (Mayor Echols) 4. City Council Goals Setting Workshop (Councilman Ramsey) 5. ,R-3 Zoning Issues (Councílman Ramsey) 6. Other Items I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .".1 I :11 I I ~':~_; t ',. , ",..,." Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7. *Executive Session to Discuss Land, Personnel, and/or Litigation *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law Advisory of Dedication Ceremony for New Fire Station No. 1 - Friday, February 28, 1986 at 10:00 a.m. Invitations will be sent. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NO~TH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGE~~A JANUARY 27, 1986 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 N.E. Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER 1. ITEM Call to Order ACTION TAKEN 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting January 13, 1986 5. Removal of Item (s) from the Consent Agenda 6. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by Asterisk (8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 & 19) 7. PZ 85-148 Request for an Appeal Hearing on PZ 85-148 * 8. GN 86-7 Approval of Ordinance No. 1338 _ Street and Drainage Asse~sment Policy * 9. GN 86-8 Railroad Crossing Signalization at Smithfield Road and St. Louis Southwestern Railway *10. GN 86-9 Approval to Request Additional Polling Places, Resolution No. 86-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *11. GN 86-10 Approval of Agreement with Texas Department of Health, Resolution No. 86-4 12. GN 86-11 Public Hearing, Community Development Block Grant Funds *13. PU 86-2 Bid Award to First Responder for One Type I Modular Ambulance *14. PU 86-3 Bid Award to Trinity Equipment for Two 72" Diesel Powered Mowers in the Amount of $14,166.00 *15. PW 86-2 Change Order #2 - Chapman Drive Paving & Drainage Improvements *16. PAY 86-4 Ratification of Payment to Walker Construction Company in the Amount of $47,631.60 for Pay Estimate #1 on Flory Street Improvements *17. PAY 86-5 Ratification of Payment to LCH Construction Company in the Amount of $158,374.20 for Pay Estimate #6 on Morgan Meadows East Drainage Improvements *18. PAY 86-6 Ratification of Payment to Mid-State Utilities, Inc. in the Amount of $62,039.36 for Pay Estimate #1 on Cardinal Lane Water Extension I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *19. PAY 86-7 Ratification of Payment to Austin Road Comapny in the Amount of $85,617.30 for Pay Estimate #3 on Municipal Complex Site Improvements 20. Citizen Presentation The Chase~od Constructi~ Co~any Re: Quinten's Crossing Apartments Site Barring Fence 21. Adjournment I I City of jXðrth Richland Hills, Texas I I I I TO: Rodger N. Line FINM-0011-86 FROM: Lee Maness I SUBJECT: Proposed Federal Tax Reforms that Impact the City I As you are aware, many tax changes currently being proposed by the Federal Government are currently being debated in the House and Senate that severely impact the ability of local governments to issue tax exempt General Obligation and Revenue Bond debt. Mr. Harold McInroe, Senior Vice President of First Southwest Company, has generally outlined those changes to my staff. Harold has requested time to make a presentation to the City Council on those proposed changes. I I I It is my recommendation that Mr. Harold McInroe be allowed to make a presentation at the January 27th council meeting. He will probably need about thirty minutes for presentation and question answer period. Sincerely, I I I I '-4 7J~. Lee Maness I I I I (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 76118 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL - 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JANUARY 13, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Echols called the meeting to order January 13, 1986 at 7:30 P.M. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Marie Hinkle Jim Kenna Virginia Moody Harold Newman Jim Rams'ey Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Staff: RodgerN. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Lee Maness Richard Royston Richard Albin City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney Finance Director Director of Planning City Engineer Absent: Gene Riddle Public Works Director Press: David Ray Mark England Chris Williams Northeast Chronicle Mid Cities Fort Worth Star Telegram 3. INVOCATION Councilman Kenna gave the invocation. Councilwoman Moody introduced the Southern Family from Australia. I Ie· I I I I I I I P I I I I I I I Ie I January 13, 1986 Page 2 4 . MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 23, 1985 APPROVED Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of December 23, 1985. Motion carried 7-0. 5. REMOVAL OF ITEM (S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilwoman Moody removed Item No. 25 and Councilman Ramsey removed Item No. 32 from the Consent Agenda. 6 . CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 34 & 35) APPROVED Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked that Items No. IS & 16 be moved to this point on the agenda. 15. PZ 85-143 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS TO REZONE TRACT 6B, WILLIAM COX SURVEY, ABSTPACT 321, FROM R-2 TO R-3 (LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE AND SMITHFIELD ROAD) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Line stated that the City purchased this property so that Hightower and Smithfield Road could be widened. Mr. Line stated the City was left with the excess property and felt the best use would be to subdivide and sell. Mr. Line stated the property would be subdivided into three lots with 1,600 square foot minimum house size which would be in excess of the houses in the area. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Mike Jones, 7128 Sweetbriar, appeared before the Council. . I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I January 13, 1986 Page 3 Mr. Jones stated that R-3 zoning would devalue his property. Mr. Jones stated that to subdivide into three lots would overcrowd the area. Mr. Jones urged the Council to vote against this case. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked Mr. Jones which lot he owned. Mr. Jones stated that he owned Lot 10. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated that based on information rpceived from the Staff, Mr. Jones' lot was not quite 9,000 square feet. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated the lots in question were a little over 8,100 square feet which was larger than the R-3 zoning requirements. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated that the carports on the back could be torn down and the lots made even larger. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated he felt there was an obligation, as far as excess City property, to try to get some kind of return fair and equitable to all citizens. Mr. Dale Weston, 7117 Smithfield Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Weston stated that there was room on the property for only one house and that he also felt the property values in the area would be devalued. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 16. ORDINANCE NO. 1331 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve Ordinance No. 1331 with the stipulation of 1,600 square foot houses. Councilman Ramsey stated he had looked at the property and another option for the City could be co~nercial. Councilman Ramsey stated that three homes would fit in the area and that it would be in the best interest of the neighborhood to have residential zoning. Councilwoman Moody stated she felt the zoning should be R-2 because everything else in the area was R-2. Councilwoman Moody stated she felt that if a developer was requesting R-3 it would be denied. Councilman Ramsey stated he disagreed with Councilwoman Moody, that according to statistics that were prepared, 75% of the homes in the area were around 1,600 square feet and 25% were 1,350. Councilman Ramsey stated that by putting a restriction of 1,600 square foot homes would be looking out for the best I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I Janl1ary 13, 1986 Page 4 interest of the neighborhood. Councilman Ramsey stated that three more lots in an area that large was not going to degrade the neighborhood. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated the property on the cross street was very comparable in size to the lots in question. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated the lots in question were less than 10% below R-2 zoning. Councilwoman Moody stated she ran the numbers on the lots the City was proposing the R-3 zoning on. Councilwoman Moody stated the largest lot was 7,300 square feet and the smallest lot was 6,800 square feet which was next to a 9,430 square foot lot. Mr. Line stated the lot was 115' x 70' which he calculated to be 8,050 square feet. Councilman Ramsey called for the question. Motion carried 6-1; Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilwoman Hinkle, Councilmen Fisher, Kenna, Newman, and Ramsey voting for and Councilwoman Moody voting against. . 7. PZ 85-139 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF RACETRAC PETROLEUM INC. TO REZONE LOT 2, BLOCK 1, RICHLAND TERRACE ADDITION FROM C-2 TO C-2-SU-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY FACING NORTH HILLS MALL Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. John partesius, District Manager for Racetrac Inc., appeared before the Council. Mr. Partesius stated the reason for this request was so they could be competitive with other businesses in the area. Mayor Echols asked whose name the permit would be issued in. Mr. Partesius stated it would be issued in the name of John partesius. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I January 13, 1986 Page 5 8 . ORDINANCE NO. 1327 APPROVED Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve Ordinance No. 1327, permit to be issued in the name of John Partesius and non-transferable. Motion carried 7-0. 9 . PZ 85-140 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF LOREN HOWERTON, TRUSTEE, TO REZONE TRACT 2F AND PART OF TRACT 2, J.B. EDEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 499 FROM AG TO R-3 (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE EXTENSION OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE EAST OF STONYBROOKE ADDITION) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Doug Long, 1615 Precinct Line Road, representing Loren Howerton, appeared before the Council. Mr. Long stated that they were requesting R-3 zoning with 1600 square foot house size. Mr. Long stated that they were looking at the lot size and not trying to reduce the house size. Councilman Kenna asked if the small rectangular portion was included in the request. Mr. Long stated that portion was not owned by his client. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing tc speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 10. ORDINANCE NO. 1328 APPROVED Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 1328 with the stipulation of l,600 square foot houses. Motion carried 4-3; Councilmen Kenna, Fisher, Ramsey and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for and Councilwoman Moody, Councilman Newman and Mayor Pro Tern Davis voting against. I Ie I I I I I I I f' I I I I I I -- I I - January 13, 1986 Page 6 11. PZ 85-l41 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF DELBERT STEMBRIDGE, TRUSTEE, TO REZONE TRACT 3, J. CONDRA SURVEY, ABSTRACT 311, FROM AG TO R-3 (LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF STARNES ROAD AND DOUGIJAS LANE) Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked to be excused because of a possible conflict of interest. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please corne forward. Delbert Stembridge, Engineer, appeared before the Council. Mr. Stembridge stated even though they were requesting R-3 zoning, before the previous owner would sell he had them to stipulate that the houses would be a minimum of 1,700 square feet. Councilman Kenna stated that the Thoroughfare Plan required that both Douglas Lane and Starnes Road be collector streets which would require additional dedication of right-of-way. Mr. Stembridge stated that the right-of-way would be granted at the time of platting. Councilwoman Moody asked Mr. Stembridge why he was not asking for R-2 zoning with the 1,700 square foot restriction. Mr. Stembridge stated that R-3 allowed the flexibility of two or three more lots and since they were going to have to grant more right-of-way they would like to get as many lots as they could. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Mr. Marvin Smith, 7609 Douglas Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Smith stated that he was not really opposed to the zoning, but was concerned with the size of the houses. Mr. Smith stated he would like to see 1,750 square foot homes and most of the people in the area would like 1,800 square foot homes. Councilman Ramsey stated the minimum was 1,700 square feet. Councilwoman Moody asked if the neighbors were concerned with the high density. Mr. Smith stated he could live with the density, but would prefer larger lots and homes. I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I January 13, 1986 Page 7 Mrs. Mary Atkins, 7133 Douglas Lane, appeared before the Council. Mrs. Atkins stated she was not pleased with the R-3 zoning. Mrs. Atkins stated she would like to see the house sizes as close as possible to the houses presently in the area. Mrs. Atkins stated she was also concerned with the high density. Mayor Echols stated that according to the Planning and Zoning Minutes, Mrs. Atkins had appeared and stated she could go along with the 1,700 square foot homes. Mrs. Atkins stated she could live with the 1,700 square foot homes but would prefer to have the larger homes and lots if possible. Mr. Jack Frisque, 8025 Valley Drive, representing Green Valley Homeowners Association, appeared before the Council. Mr. Frisque stated that most of the homes in the area were larger than R-3. Mr. Frisque stated that there were ordinances that stipulated house sizes and he felt the City was not being consistent. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 12. ORDINANCE NO. 1329 DENIED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to deny Ordinance No. 1329. Motion carried 5-1; Councilmen Fisher, Kenna, Newman, and Councilwomen Moody and Hinkle voting for and Councilman Ramsey voting against. 139 PZ 85-142 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF DOYLE D. Sl1ITH TO REZONE LOT 1, BLOCK 6, MORGAN MEADOWS ADDITION FROM R-l TO R-l-S (LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHAPMAN ROAD AND MEADOW ROAD) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Doyle Smith, owner, appeared before the Council. Mr. Smith stated they had a contract on this property contingent upon their receiving R-l-S zoning. I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I , I January 13, 1986 Page 8 Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to to this request to please corne forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 14. ORD!NANCE NO. 1330 APPROVED Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve Ordinance No. 1330. Motion carried 7-0. 17. PZ 85-145 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE PART OF TRACT 14B, W.W. WALLACE SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1606, FROM R-5-D TO C-1 (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY EAST OF COLORADO BOULEVARD) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Allan Williams, representing Grapevine Highway Joint Venture, appeared before the Council. Mr. Williams stated that at the present time this property was zoned for duplexes which was not feasible for the property. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please corne forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 18. ORDINANCE NO. 1332 APPROVED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve Ordinance No. 1332. Motion carried 6-1; Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilmen Kenna, Fisher, Newman and Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody voting for and Councilman Ramsey voting against. I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I January 13, 1986 Page 9 19. PZ 85-146 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF FRANK LYNCH TO REZONE PART OF TRACT 5 AND 4A1, S. RICHARDSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1266 FROM AG TO R-3 (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GREEN VALLEY DRIVE WEST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Dick Perkins, Engineer, representing Frank Lynch, appeared before the Council. Mr. Perkins asked if Items No. 21 and 22 could be considered together. Mayor Echols advised the cases would be heard separately. Mr. Perkins stated that they had appeared before the Planning and Zoning Commission several times on the property in question. Mr. Perkins stated that the first time they had requested multi-family zoning. Mr. Perkins stated that later they had applied for C-1 zoning along Davis Boulevard which was granted. Mr. Perkins stated that they applied for Townhouse Garden Homes and later found that this type of zoning really did not fit. Mr. Perkins stated a new zoning classification of R-8 was initiated. Mr. Perkins stated they presented their request to the Planning & Zoning Commission who expressed concern that there would be too much R-8 zoning. Mr. Perkins stated a work session was held with the Planning & Zoning Commission and the present plan was agreed upon. Mr. Perkins stated he felt the request would be compatible with the area. Councilwoman Moody asked Mr. Perkins if he was aware that R-1 zoning abutted this property. Mr. Perkins replied yes. Mayor Echols asked if he was aware of the right-of-way needed for Bursey Road. Mr. Perkins replied yes. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Mr. Jack Frisque, 8025 Valley Drive, representing Green Valley Homeowners Association, appeared before the Council. Mr. Frisque stated again there was no consistency. Mr. Frisque stated that there would be an impact on the traffic standpoint because of the high density. I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I - I I January 13, 1986 Page 10 There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 20. ORDINANCE NO. 1333 DENIED Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to deny Ordinance No. 1333. Motion carried 7-0. 21. PZ 85-147 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST OF FRANK LYNCH TO REZONE PART OF TRACT 4A1 AND 5, S. RICHARDSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1266, FROM AG TO R-8 (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GREEN VALLEY DRIVE WEST OF DAVIS BOULEVARD) Mr. Dick Perkins, Engineer, appeared before the Council. Mr. Perkins asked that this case be tabled. 22. ORDINANCE NO. 1334 TABLED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to table Ordinance No. 1334. Motion carried 7-0. 23. PZ 85-135 REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL HEARING ON PZ 85-135 GRANTED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to set the Appeal Rearing on PZ 85-135 £or February 10, 1986. Motion carried 7-0. 24. PZ 85-144 REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL HEARING ON PZ 85-144 GRANTED Councilman Kenna asked to be excused because of a possible conflict of interest. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to set the Appeal Hearing on PZ 85-l44 for February 10, 1986. Motion carried 6-0. I ~ I I I I I I I P I I I I I I I , I January 13, 1986 Page 11 25. PS 85-90 REQUEST OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FOR FINAL PLAT ON LOTS 14-16, BLOCK 2, BRIARWOOD ESTATES (LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHTOWER DRIVE AND SMITHFIELD ROAD) APPROVED Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve PS 85-90. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated he would like to see this item approved subject to the carports being torn down to make the lots larger. Motion carried 7-0 with the stipulation that carports on the two westerly lots be removed, and the lots be enlarged as much as possible. *26. GN 86-l ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE SHARING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1985/86, ORDINANCE NO. 1326 APPROVED 27. GN 86-2 CALLING CITY COUNCIL ELECTION, RESOLUTION NO. 86-1 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to appoint Gary Holt, Election Judge, Bob Bartley, First Alternate Judge, Jane Bell, Second Alternate Judge, and Lee Anne Lamond, Third Alternate Judge and appoint as the Absentee Ballot Board, Gary Holt, Chief Judge, Bob Bartley, Member and Jane Bell, Member. Motion carried 7-0. *28~ GN 86-3 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF DEPUTY COURT CLERK, RESOLUTION NO. 86-2 APPROVED *29. GN 86-4 APPOINTMENT OF INVESTMENT OFFICER, ORDINANCE NO. 1335 APPROVED *30. GN 86-5 OBSTRUCTION OF WATER METERS, ORDINANCE NO. 1336 APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I January 13, 1986 Page 12 *31. GN 86-6 PARKS BOND MONEY APPROVED 32. PU 86-1 BID AWARD TO STANDARD REGISTER FOR THRIF-T-MAILER AND TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM UTILITY RETAINED EARNINGS APPROVED Mr. Line stated that the Staff felt this type of mailer would cut down on delinquent water bills because of the return envelope. Mr. Line stated this proposal was to change from the present postcard type water bill to provide a computer prepared mailer that would include a return envelope for the convenience of the customer. Mr. Line stated the Staff felt this would speed up collections, would prompt people to pay their bills more qUickly, and would cut down on the number of delinquent and cut-off notices. Councilman Ramsey stated that he felt this had merit but would like to see it done on a trial basis. Mr. Line stated that it could be done on a trial basis for one year. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve PU 86-1 for a period of one year. Motion carried 6-1; Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilmen Newman, Kenna, Fisher and Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody voting for and Councilman Ramsey voting against. *33. PW 86-1 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY FOR LAB AND SEtvER SURCHARGE TESTING -- APPROVED *34. PAY 86-1 PAYMENT OF LEGAL FEES FOR FREEWAY INTERCHANGE PROJECT APPROVED *35. PAY 86-2 PARTIAL PAYMENT, PAYMENT #2 TO COPE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,992 - MUNICIPAL COMPLEX SITE ON WATAUGA ROAD APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I lit ,I I I I I I I f I January 13, 1986 Page 13 35a. PAY 86-3 PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE #5 TO P & R PAVING, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $52,435.28 - HEWITT STREET PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve Pay 86-3. Motion carried 7-0. 36. CITIZEN PRESENTATION NONE 37. ADJOURN~1ENT Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to adjourn. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration _ Council Meeting Date: 1-27-86 SUbject: Request for an Appeal Hearing on PZ 85-148 Agenda Number: PZ 85-148 If Council grants the request for an appeal hearing, the hearing can be heard February 24, 1986. Recommendation: Set date for hearing. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other N/A Finance Review Acct. Number N/A Sufficient Funds Available - K'l1/~ City Manager . Finance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I {' I - January 15, 1986 IX)UBLE B. DEVELOPt-1ENT Co. 3416 CHAFFIN DR. FORT WOR'I'H, TEXAS 76118 1-817-429-8321 Mr. Roger Line North Richland Hills City Manager 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, lI'exas 76118 IÆar Sir: We appeared before the planning and zoning comission on January 9, 1986 to request a rezone for Lot 3 R Blk. F, Richland Oaks Addition from R-l (single family residense) to LR (local retail) with the intention of building a single story office building, approximately 6000 square feet. We were turned down by the comission at that tirœ. Following the meeting we met with sonlE.' of the pc..:ople in that area who attended the meeting and upon seeing our plans for tlle project had no objection and encouraged us to appeal the decision. The property is comœrcial on two sides and the homes nearest the site all face either Pearl Dr. or Jerrie Jo, none are facing strur:rrœr Dr. At one tirœ this property was zoned comœrcial. We would appreciate the opportunity to appear before the city council for an appeal hearing at the earliest possible date. We are looking forward to working with you. Thanky,?u, ¿'- " /'/} /,:1 · . . . , 1// . y/ ! ~PU¿// oI(j~ Ronnle L. Butler, Pres. I, "'. I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works 1-27-86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: GN 86-7 Subject: Approval of Ordinance l383 - Street and Drainage Assessment Policy The City Attorney has rewritten the enclosed assessment policy and put it in ordinance form. The changes that have been made are those that were discussed on the pre-council agenda at the last council meeting. The changes include a more clearer definition of residential property and the deletion of the 50% credit where bond funds are used for all other property. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 1338. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget - (J Other ~ _ {0£t Department Head Signature e CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡2~1/~ City Mánager , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I -- I I I I I I I . I I· I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1338 WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, recognlzlng that equity requires that abutting property owners to streets being improved must bear an equitable share of the costs involved in accordance with Texas Law, and subject to the limitation that no property will be assessed for more than the value added to said property, does hereby adopt the following general rules regarding street improvement assessments. They will be applicable to construction, reconstruction, and major maintenance projects where substantial improvement results and abutting property is increased in value. NOW, THEREFORE, Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. Resolution No. 79-2~ is repealed. 2. assessed: The following percentage of actual costs shall generally be Real Property Actually Used for Single Family Residence, R-l, R-2 or R-3 Curb, Gutter and Sidewalks (3) tl] Storm Drainage & Paving (1) State and Federal Highways (City Share) (To Include Federal Urban System Projects on City Streets) Thoroughfare Streets Collector Streets Residential Streets 60% 50% 60% 70% 80% 50% 60% 70% All Other Property tl5 Curb, Gutter and Sidewalks (3) Storm Drainage & Paving State and Federal Highways (City Share) ,(To Include Federal Urban System Projects on City Streets) Thoroughfare Streets Collector Streets Residential Streets 100% 80% 100% 100% 100% 80% 90% 90% Note 1 - No assessment for paving will be made where those costs are borne for storm drainage and paving by state and/or federal funds, one half the rates specified shall be assessed if construction is part of a Bond program on residential property (actually used), R-l, R-2 or R-3. I \t' I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I - I I Page L. Note 2 - Property zoned residential but being used primarily for other purposes will be treated as "all other property". Note 3 - Appropriate credit for existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk will be granted depending on the amount of repair and realignment required. Note 4 - Vacant land and/or lots are assessed at "all other property" rate. These properties are considered as investments regardless of the zoning classification or what they are being used for. The percentage figures cited above are general in nature and the council reserves the right to adjust the actual dollar amounts within the limits allowed by Texas Law from project to project in accordance with the relative value added to the assessed property. In the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary, the primary factor in determining the value added to abutting property will be the cost of the improvements. ATTEST: MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: l-27-86 Subject: Railroad Crossing Signalization at Smithfield Road and St. Louis Southwestern Railway Agenda Number: GN 86-8 I I I I I I I The State has approved a project for upgrading the railroad crossing at Smithfield Road at the railroad. The improvements will include signals and drop-arms at this crossing. The State is paying 80% of the cost and the City and the railroad each are paying lO% of the cost. The amount of the City's cost is $10,500. Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available in General CIP Unspecified and it is recommended the project be funded as follows: Transfer from 13-00-99-6l50 $10,500 $10,500 Transfer to 13-00-85-6150 Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of the certification statement and the funding of $lO,500 for this project by transfers as outlined above. Ir rJ ~ G) tx:1 2: b ~ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ 2: ~ þj k; Finance Review Acct. Number ~ee ahove SUffiCi~S Available iW~ ßÆr CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director -.I w ß Departmer -.I \..0 CO 0) ~ Page 1 of 1 I ~, I {' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I -- ~':~ ,;,01:' ~ ,~.-: - - ~ Iu . 't --:/f'lT. ' )( ~,~,\" ",. ; > ~ -.. I '" .J ,.,.:.~ '. COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION P. O. Box 6868 Fort Worth, Texas 76115 January 14, 1986 _e_ _e_ ENGINEER-DIRECTOR MARK G. GOODE ROBERT C. LANIER, CHAIRMAN THOMAS M. DUNNING RAY STOKER, JR. IN REPLY REFER TO FILE NO. 1986 City-County Grade Crossing Protection Program Project GRP 8606-2-6 SLSW & Smithfield Rd. in North Richland Hills Tarrant County - DOT No. 789 722N Mr. Rodger N. Line City Manager City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Dear Mr. Line: The above listed project has been approved by the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation Commission Minute Order No. 83824. The cost of the project is shared 80% by the State, 10% by the Railroad and 10% by the City. In order for the State's 80% of the General Revenue funds to be appropriated for the project, the City's 10% must be in Austin by July 31, 1986. At this time, please execute the two attached Certification Statements indi- cating that the City of North Richland Hills is willing to participate in the proposed project. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact this office. Yours very truly, \64/~4eJ Billy A. Hardie District Design Engineer CRC:am Attachments 181_1986 SES~U~£,,1 ~n",,,, I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration - Council Meeting Date: 1-27-86 Subject: Approval to Request Additional Polling Places, Resolution No. 86-3 Agenda Number: GN 86-9 The City Secretary submitted a request to the Justice Department in November, 1985 to authorize three polling places for future elections. We were notified that there was a time element involved and a resolution had to be in existence one year prior to this request. The attached resolution will be submitted to the Justice Department if approved and should enable us to receive approval for the 1987 election. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 86-3. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct.Number N/A Sufficient Funds Available N/A tC~ Department Head Signature ' f elf(' ~age~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I RESOLUTION NO. 86-3 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is desirable to increase the number of polling places for its City elections in order to make voting more convenient for all its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the use of voting machines for absentee voting is more convenient and more accurate than paper ballots. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. Beginning with the regular City election in April, 1987 the polling places for City elections sh~ll be: (a) 7301 Northeast Loop 820 (City Municipal Complex); and (b) 6801 Glenview Drive (Branch City Hall); and (c) 8300 Starnes Road (Fire Station). 2. The City Secretary shall be empowered to use voting machines, if available, for absentee voting. 3. The City Secretary is authorized and directed to send a certified copy of this Resolution to the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, Voting Section, Washington, D.C. as soon as practicable. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas this 27th day of January, 1986. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I I I I I I I I ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Legal Subject: - Council Meeting Date: 1-27-86 A roval of A reement with Texas Department of Health, Resolution No. 86-4 Agenda Number: GN 86-10 Some time ago we inaugurated a drive to get our water supply "approved" by the State Health Department so that we could exhibit the sign "Public Water System Approved". We have complied with all the requirements levied by the State. The attached resolution authorizes the City to enter into an agreement with the State on placement and maintenance of the signs. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 86-4. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number N/ A Sufficient Funds Available N/A Rfl '-~ Department Head Signature I. City Mãnager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I 'I I {' I RESOLUTION NO. 86-4 WHEREAS, in 1983 the City Manager and City Council inaugurated a program to cause the City of North Richland Hills Water System standards to be elevated in order to meet State of Texas "Approval"; and WHEREAS, the City Water System has now met State requirements for "Approval"; and WHEREAS, upon execution of an agreement between the City and the State Department of Health the City will be entitled to display the signs "Public Water System Approved". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, that: 1. The Mayor, City M~nager and Director of Utilities be, and are hereby authorized to execute the necessary agreements with the Department of Health of the State of Texas giving full force and effect to the erection of signs advertising the good quality of the drinking water supply of this City. 2. Upon execution of said agreement the Director of Utilities is authorized to erect the signs "Public Water Supply Approved" pursuant to the terms of the said agreement. PASSED AND APPROVED this 27th day of January, 1986. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I {' I AN AGREEMENT In view of having received an approved public water supply rating in accordance with TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH standards for approval of public water supplies and in order to create public confidence and to properly advertise the good quality of the drinking water supply of the City of North Richland Hills the TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH has granted this permission to erect standard highway markers on the recognized highways leading into the area served by the City of North Richland Hills. On their part, the OFFICIALS OF the City of North Richland Hills agree to prepare, erect, maintain and be entirely responsible for these signs. The OFFICIALS further agree to effect the immediate removal of such signs- whenever they are advised by the TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH that the rating of this supply has fallen below the required standards. In the event of a question arising in regard to the removal of the signs, it is understood and agreed that the TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH is empowered to effect their removal as though the signs were the property of the DEPARTMENT. In AGREEMENT OF THE ABOVE CONSIDERATION, the following parties attach their names to this understanding. Honorable Dan Echols, Mayor City of North Richland Hills Mr. Roger Line, City Manager' City of North Richland Hills Mr. M. E. Riddle, Director of Utilities City of North Richland Hills Robert Bernstein, M.D., F.A.C.P. Commissioner of Health I·r I I I I I , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Engineering Public Hearing - Community Development Block Subject: Grant Funds Council Meeting Date: 1/27/86 Agenda Number: GN 86-11 The purpose of this Public Hearing is to receive citizen input regarding needs of our low to moderate income neighborhoods. The Housing & Community Development Block Grant Program of Tarrant County is now in its 12th year. Funds from this program have been used in the past for channel improvements on Mackey Creek from Onyx Drive South to Harmonson Road. Other eligible CDBG activities which may be considered by HUD for federal funding include water and sewer system improvements, street improvements. sidewalk and wheelchair ramp construction, parks and recreational facilities development, fire station construction and housing rehabilation. All citizens, groups and organizations of our city are welcome to participate and be represented in the formulation of the 12th year plan. This Public Hearing is open for public advice, comments, complaints, questions or presentations of alternative proposals. The public may present their views in writing by obtaining a questionnaire from the City Secretary, complete it and return it to her office. The proposed projects will be discussed at the next City Council Meeting, Monday, February 10, 1986, at 7:30 p.m. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available K1Æ/~ Department Head Signature ' City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I. t··~: :::::, ~...,....j -. I I I I I I 1_- r Ie I. I I I I I I···..~ :~~1 "t' I #" . .~ QUESTIO~~AIRE FOR CDBG CrTIZE~ PARTICIPATIO~ Your County Commissioner and City Council would like to find out what your community needs are. The information obtained from this questionnaire will be used to develop progr~s using Community Development Block Grant funds that Tarrant County will request from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Da'te City Name of the s~reet where you live: Your interest and cooperation will help make your city and co~~unity a better ' , place to live. Please PU~ an "X" in the box that best answers the question of need. PROJECTS: }.1QST J\TEEDED NEED DONtT ~~ED CJ CJ CJ D CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ r=J CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ Repair of houses Street improvements Curbs and gutters Side\o-;a.lks Storr: èrains Removal or archi'tectural barriers (Example: Ramps for the handicapped) Senior centers CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ Flood and drainage improvemen'ts (example: channel improvements) 1\'ater and sewer D CJ CJ In my opinion, the most important single need of my co~~unity out of the above is: Other services my community needs are: (Please list them) My COn'.:nents (other things I would 1 He to tel I my County Com."nissioner and Ci ty Council) are: Notices on community development public meetings are published in area ne~s?apers" citizens' CO~tlents and input are ~elcome. Please return this form to the city officials at the end of the public hearing, or address ~Titten CO~~ents to: Tarrant County Planning Departmen~ 100 W. Weatherford Street Fort ~orth, "Texas 76102 " - Tñank ~ for ~ participation! I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Purchasing * Bid award to First Responder for one SUbject: Tvp e I Modular Ambulance Council Meeting Date: 1-27-86 Agenda Number: PU 86-2 On January 6, 1986 at 10:00, bids for the above mentioned Ambulance were opened and the results are outlined below. Vendor Exceptions Warranty Amounts A. Miller's Emergency Equipment 2 Module 12 Year 48,934.00 Chassis 12 mos/12,OOO mile B. Southwest Professional Vehicle 3 Module 15 Year 48,868.00 Chassis 12 mos/12,OOO mile . C. Collins Ambulance 3 Module 10 Year 47,872.00 Chev. Chassis 12 mos/12,000 mile Cl. Collins Ambulance (Alternate Bid) 3 Module 10 Year 48,632.00 Ford Chassis 12 mos/12,000 mile D. San Antonio Ambulance No Bid E. First Responder 0 Module 10 Year 41,994.00 Steel Chassis 12 mos/12,OOO mile El. *First Responder (Alternate Bid) 0 Module Life Time 44,994.00 Stainless Steel Chassis 12 mos/12,00 mile Vendor "A" Two exceptions are very minor and can provide an ambulance satisfactory to our needs. Vendor "B" Three exceptions are as follow: (1) Not providing an overhead console. (2) Mounting the Module on Oak Slats instead of Mounting Doughnuts. (3) Single Rubber Gasket instead of Double. Vendor "C"'s exceptions should be classified as only two exceptions. I feel that on one item he is in compliance. The exceptions are as follow: (1) Failure to bid 2-105 Amp Alternators which is a must. (2) Substitution on the Air Conditioning System we specified. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other x . Finance Director wf!;:Æ ITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Paqe 1 of 2 I I Ie Vendor "E'" exceeds our specifications. They have taken our basic requirements, im- proved on our needs and offered a very competitive price. Our basic specifications are written around an Aluminum Modular box in an effort to reduce our cost. Vendor's A, B, and C do meet this requirement. First Responder has exceeded our specifications by I going to the all Stainless Steel Modular Box, Under Federal Law an Ambulance used for Emergency services must meet Regulations KKKA 1822B, Sub Sections 3.10.5 page 16, (Copy Attached). Council will note the Federal Government Guide lines are "The body, Type I I Modular Unit and Type II and III integral cab-body shall be of prime commercial quality metal or other material with strength at least equivalent to all-steel". Page 2 I I have personally spoken to Joe Unrein of the Denver Colorado Ambulance Service Company, who has a fleet of 24 First Responder Ambulances. He advised me that they have had superior results with the all Steel Modular Ambulance. I Mr. Joe Unrein also advised that due to the all Steel Construction the Denver Colorado Ambulance Service has not had any injuries to the Paramedics or passengers in the Ambulance as a result of traffic accidents. I Recommendations: It is staffs recommendation that First Responder be awarded the bid in the amount of 44,994.00 for a Stainless Steel Type I Modular Ambulance. I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS I a , f the MetropIex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM -'e'ENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: , I¡.\~ ¡ -. ',- '" Request For: Modular Ambulance . , \ ''''''''- -. ~ ¡ -~ ..~ .'" .-.. I" ' ,. , r: 01 Bid Opening Date: January 6, 1986 f- . ~ , : : '. ~~ .. ,; L.'....j/\ t..'~ ~ I G· 'II TC~/:z.J _. ~ "''"''\ Date: ~ . t_ rta-~" ... ~ t -.. I v:::.'_ J -; (; ~ ,¡ ¡ ~ ...;. .~¡ i i ~:: I Requisition No. IH~··.!:~'r2 =.>;'r~:~r3 L~¡ y~ur sLl:3.'1 Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. CST City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 A TTN : City Secretary Phone: 281-0041, ext. 187 iTEM DESCRIPTION, QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL ......- .'" 1 II Modular Ambulance nl - Il 1.1 Make ~~ nCra-+-t. ,qj~ ea... eo.. r¡ 4 ¡, 99t.f lOt [:191 qq'-l:s.~ II Model'~/jðI tJGAJJdl11 -iecP ~f¿¿ , " . / tr1.. ~ 'j LJ- A .1~_~~ C AJ~e I Lra.ET f/L¡f/~99'1 ~ If 4'1 9 9;¡ß.~ riel '( It.: R; d Ii, ~(¿T .<;hl,~ JeSS ~+ ec-=> I / / f , a. f - I ,- -- , _. '1 : . f ..-... -- - -I f SUB-TOTAL ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID ~ee 4 bl) v-~ C~ 0f0"'; iJeJII/(}/~ IIlkrr1~1Þ- ß,(/ b,c/~ - S % DA YS, F.O. . CITY OF NORTH , IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- AND HILLS: DELIVERY IN t,0 DAYS FROM ('ec.:€ ( pt- . The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- o-P, 9 Deaese the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- C h AS"S' IS ~Sl~ward purchases on an individual item basis when in its s terests. All SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- .J ROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF JRTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS. J:i I CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HilLS WITHIN A TUTES A BINDIN CO T COMPANY: 'j BY: PHONE NUMBER: SIGNATURE: T~-:IS fS NOT A PU~CHASE ORDER I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f' I GENERAL CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which n011consideration' is properly request'~d may be retu,rned' unopened. The proposàl may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in sUbmitting the same., warrants and guarantees that his. bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or condit~ons not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. Cc) Unbalanced value of any items. Cd) t~ere the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I 9. I I ¡e -L- 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF -BIDDERS Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opi~ion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland ' Hills will pre.vent or hinder the prompt completion of additional'work if awarded.. 6 · AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Mariager.- - - Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Turchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) I I Ie I ·1 I I I I Ie I I I I I I I i' I (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. I I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I GENERAL CONDITIONS VEHICLE BID 1. Vehicles other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series indentifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type of vehicles desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications must be outlined on a separate document noting the item number and fully explaining the.exceptions. The City of ~ Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations ~ ~ specifications and its jUdgment in~., sue. matters ~ be conclusive. Vendor Initial ~..~ , 3. The units shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the units made ready for continuous operation with a full tank of fuel. 4. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the vehicles he proposes to furnish. 5. The successful bidder shall furnish a manufacturer's Certificate of origin and Parts Manual with delivery of each unit. 6. For bids on more than one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. 7. All equipment covered by this bid shall be delivered from point of assembly to the City of North Richland Hills area by railway freight or conveyed by truck. Equipment shall not be driven or towed in whole or part. Each invoice request for-pãÿmë;t shall be accompanied by an affidavit in which shall be set out that the equipment covered by this invoice has not been driven or towed in whole or part from point of manufacturer to the City of North Richland Hills area. Vehicles may be driven from dealer's service center to the City of North Richland Hills provided the distance from the service center to the City does not exceed one hundred (100) milés. 8. Warranty for parts and labor must be described and included in this bid. I I Ie I 'I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' 1- . The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by (a) ':/;<f fk~~ ~rt(&omplies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) -:¿ /) L· (; -~ (J~¡Jt:, W f S'Á 1_0 ~ ) exceptions. rr/'e. .:> I~, _ _ ¡j --" ."" I' e.)(C.~I1I(()'r11~ And further undèrstand that the City of North Richland HitIs' acceptance oì any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. L&# ~~ Signed Pre s ~M- Title /;(- ;;)b-RS Date . Frr~i ,erO/l¿ ¡{ecltc;¡; Company Name THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION --- - Vendor Note: (a) Vendor: Company Name f,;~f t2e ~{)~dkt J.t¿~ If None Write "NO" '3 - ~ -t-o ~_: *, -S- oj/~ cf LD/1 r~a . of. f': I' SO /111 ¿¿Iu~ (b) Number of Exceptions, I I Ie I I I I I 1 Ie I" I I I I I 1 (' I 3.10.~· Patient c~apartment interior dimensional ~ara~~t~rs. The patient's compar meat ahall prov1de, but 1. not limited to, a minimum or 300 cubic teet ot space, less 10 percent deviation tor cabinets, vhile complying vith the tolloving: LenRth; Measured tróm the partition to the inside edge ot the rear loading doors the tloor, shall be at least 116 inches in length. This length in the coopar~~ent sh. provide at least 25 inches and not more than 30 inches at unobstructed space at the h~ ot the primary patient, ~easured from the technician'. seat back-rest to the rorvard' edge ot the style 1 cot. Vidth; The vidth ot the compartment atter cabln~t and cot installation, shall pro- vide at least l~ inches in type I and III, and 12 inches in type II ambulance of clear valkvay betveen cot(s) and the squad bench, and at least 25 inches (vidth) ot kneeling space (tor the technician) along side the primary cot~ measured at the tloor tor a height or 9 inches, trom the rorvard leading edge (corner) halt the length back or t~e (primary) vheeled elevating cot. Heip;ht; Mini~um ~O inches. The patient.' compa1..tm~nt shall provide at les,~t60 inch! height over the patient area, measured trom floor to,ceillng, exclusive of· cabinets or equipment, and symmetrical corners and eåges. 3.10.5 Body, ~eneral construction. The body, type I modular unit, and the type II and III integral cab-body shall be of prime' commercial quality metal or other Ir.aterial' vitb strength at least equivalent to all-steel. Yood shall not be used tor structural framing. The exterior- or the body shall be finished smooth vith symmetrically rounded corners and edges except for rub rails, presenting a modern and aerodyna~ic appearance, and shall embody provisions tor doors and vindovs specified herein. Ambulance body (prior to outside attached devices) as a unit shall be designed and built to provide impact and penetration resistance, and ~hall be ot sufficient strength to support the entire ve1ght of the tully loaded vehicle on its top or side it oVe~turned, vitbout crus~~~$.tseparat1on of Joints, or permanently deforming root boy or reinforcements, body post, doors, strainers, stringers, tloor, inner linings, outer panels, rub rails, and other reinforcements. As evidence that ambulance body ceets the above criteria, the body manutacturers, (fabricated, moditied. or conversions), excluding the conve~tlonal cab shall turnish for each body model (type) a certification that the a=bulance body meets Static Load Test Code for School Bus Body Structure, ~tandard No. OÓ2. 3.10.6 Ambulance body structure. All parts of the ambulance body, vhere ap~licable shall be fastened together vith rust-resistant tasteners in a canner vhich vill preclude loosening of bolts, screvs, and rivets, and cracking.of velded Joints. ~etal tapping plates velded to the valls or ceiling structures to provide tirm securing tor installed equipcent (cabinets, benches, partition, cylinders) shall be employed in the acbulance structure.; Self-tapping screvs shall not be used vhere subjected to stress. T~e body, roof, and panel Joints shall be vatertieht. All o~en1ngs :etveen chassis and occupant carrying cocpart~ent~ due to alternation or constr~ct1on shall be sealed, inclu~ing bulkhead~pace betveen cab and body, type I (see 3.9.9). " 3.10.7 Body ~ount1n~. Heavy rubber or anti squeak ~aterial shall be ut1l1ze~ èe~~een body fraae and attaching chassis. Reinforce~ents or filler blocks shall be useè ~here oount1ng devices ~ight othervise deform rrà~e flanges. Mounting devices s~all ~~ locked units vhich vill minicize loosening, but vh1ch ~ay be tightened if necessary. 7ypes I and III acbulance body shall have at least 4 high-strength 5/B-inch bolts to a~tach the body brackets to the fra~e chassis on each side, ~ounted so as tj p~eve~t s~y side co v e r.l e n tor the bod y. . The a. ~ b u1 an c e bod Y 0 r t y P e I v e h i c 1 e shall no t 'b £ - ~ r t 1 ¿ 't 6. '~Co} the r r ,," ':"; e £. t 8. n y p 0 ~ nt, 4 n d s h a.ll b e: i n t ere h a n f~ '! a b 1 e vi tho the r :':8. n u :- e. c t u r e r s "-~~' h ~ c ..;. e ~ h (" .:;. :,. ~ ~.!': 8 vi. n g .-:. ~ ~ .::! ;. e. ~ e cab toe. x 1 ~ (C A) d i r:l ens ion . 16 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Purchasing 1-27-86 Department: Council Meeting Date: *Bid award to Trinity Equipment for two 72" Diesel Powered Mowers in the amount of $14, 166. 00. Agenda Number: PU 86-3 On January 17, 1986 at 10:00, bids for the above mentioned Mowers were opened and results are outlined below. Vendor Exceptions Amount A. Roanoke Equipment 0 11,897.11 AI. Roanoke Equipment (Alternate Bid) 2 8,613.13 B. Watson Distributors 1 8,749.00 Bl. Watson Distributors (Alternate Bid) 5 7,337.00 C. Goldthwaites 0 7,991.00 C1. Goldthwaites (Alternate Bid) 1 7,500.00 C2. Goldthwaites (Alternate Bid) 4 6,890.00 D. Colonial Motors 3 7,390.00 E. *Trinity Equipment 2 7,083.00 Vendor "AI" Exceptions are (1) Cutting Height of 1 1/2" - 4 1/2" where we specified 1" to 4". (2) A 1" Spindle where we specified a 1 1/4" Spindle. These are very minor exceptions and this equipment is acceptable. Vendor "B" Primary Bid has one exception on their Cutting Height of 1 1/2" to 5 1/2". His Alternate Bid ("B -1") has 5 exceptions as follows: (1) A (6) gallon gas tank instead of the (8) gallon specified. (2) Disc Brakes instead of Individual Drum Brakes as required. (3) Electric Clutch Drive opposed to PTO Drive. (4) 1 1/2" to 4 1/2" Cutting Height instead of 1" to 4". (5) 1" Spindle instead of 1 1/4". Vendor lie" Primary Bid is also acceptable. Their alternate Bids Cl and C2 both have a Gasoline Engine. We must have the Diesel Engine due to the long hours of continuous use the equipment will receive. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating B t Other Finance Review Acct. Number 01-70-01-6,400 SUffi%S Available ær¿~~ City Manager ITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM --.;. , Finance Director Paae 1 of 2 I' I e Vendor I I I I I I I Page 2 "D" Bid has (3) exceptions. (1) (2) (3) o - 7.5 MPH instead of 0 - 8 as specified. Hydraulic Drive in lieu of PTO Drive. Hydraulic Motor in lieu of a Gear Box. Vendor "E" has the same two exceptions as Vendor AI. Based on their price of $7,083.00 Vendor E, Trinity Equipment has presented us with the best proposal. The Parks and Recreation Department has budgeted for a Small Riding Mower at $7,200.00 in addition to the larger Mower outlined above. By buying the John Deer Mower from Trinity Equipment at $7,083.00 each we can purchase two large Models and still have a Budget Savings. Recommendations: Award the purchase of two John Deer Mowers from Trinity Equipment in the Total Amount of $14,166.00 and waive the two exceptions. I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I' CITY OF NORTH R.lCHLAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I ~tar of the 'Metroplex I ~ VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: ""\ I t 1/2.1 N rry L/lW,J/ /MJJ) 6/f1!.j)l7J Request For: Mower Bid Opening Date: January 17, 1986 13 ~ ~ 5, #wy I~J I I UúJ/SVILLt:--J Date: 7)¿-, 7S-~ 7 Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. CST - 01/17/86 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 II North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: City Secretary Phone: 281-0041, ext. 187 IIITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL I.. 111 Diesel Powered - Self-Pronølløn Mower Per 1 Each '7DJf ~~~ S7-0g3-Î~ , , City of North Richland Hills Specifications II .1 -. IItt .1 I II II - _._..,~.- f .. ~ I'ï--- ~~-'.~'--~.-...-!' ...AtofI'>M\."''?'':"........,'_~-----..-.____......'________.. ..,._......___.,~ ...-...._" ~'_ . --- I-._.~.. --.-._'_0_'_, -'____,_ .o,,~' I II ¡I SUB-TOTAL ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID~ 7ð83~ ~ --.. IERMSA'Þ-~ - 30 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH ICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 'to DAYS FROM ECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- ~I ept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive forma¡- r to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its st interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- D FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY: -rI?lNITY L.Rû.}AJ RlUÞ &A~J BY: JðI-IN N, Cð~7CAl PHONE NUMBE:£r~ ~' 17..~::J SIGNATU7 ?G -~ DATE: ð..¡AAJ ~ THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORD~ . I I· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I GENERAL CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for non consideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which non consideration is properly requested maybe returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS ~ Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the fOllowing specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) ~~ere the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f' I 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF -BIDDERS Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the fOllowing specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6 · AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7 . ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Manager. . Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with . respect thereto. Such notice shall rlot in any '-lay constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) I I Ie (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I - I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I" f' I ----.--- GENERAL CONDITIONS EQUIPMENT BIDS 1. Equipment other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series identifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size aad type of equipment desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications may be acceptable provided such variation, in each instance, is noted on the bid. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. 3. The unit shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the unit made ready for operation. 4. Bidder must fill in all inf~rmation asked for in the blanks provided under each item. Failure to completely describe the equipment may result in rejection of the bid. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. 5. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the equipment he proposes to furnish. 6. Manufacturer's standard warranty for parts and labor must be included in tIlis bid. 7. For: bids. on morL~ than one unit of equipment, tr:e City of North Fichla:nd Hills reserves the right to make multiple purchases fro~ more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. I' I Ie I 1. I 2. 3. I 4. 5. 6. I 7. I 8. 9. I 10. 11. Ie 12. 13. I 14. 15. I 16. I 17. I 18. I 19. 20. I 21. I t' I This specification is intended to describe a heavy duty self-propelled diesel powered mower. Engine: Diesel water cooled with a minimum H.P. of 21 Fuel capacity: A minimum of 8 gallons Drive: Hydrostatic Ground Speed: (infinitely variable) with a minimum of 8MPH Tires: Pneumatic type Frame: Shall be steel reinforced with square or rectangular reinforcement Brake: Individual drum type Steering: Automotive steering gear assembly or equal Controls: Shall be hand operated with glow plug switch Alternator: Shall be a minimum of 35 AMPS Drive: 1 1/8" - 20 splined PTO shaft clutched by tight slack torque team or equal Cutting Width: Shall be a minimum of 71" front mounted Cutting Height: Shall be adjustable from 1" to 4" front. and rear in ~" increments Construction: Shall be no less than 11 gauge steel Cutter Drive: Shall be PTO drive spiral beval gear box, "B" section belts drive spendler, 1~" spindles turning on two regreasable tapered roller bearings Blades: Unit shall have a minimum of three, ~" x 25" heat treated blades The product is to be certified to meet. ANSI specifications B71..1B rd 1977) and appl~icable Federal and State OSHA Regulatíons Parts Warranty :J...y'(.J:tt';:s Of' l.C'<bht'.5. Labor Warranty a"f!'A~ Dt'- I¡c:r-:Y') hÎS / Delivery Schedule WiTHIA! q~ d-o/cÇ Total Cost of Unit -# ïj 083.. ~ Compliance Yes No ý ~ Ý / y" / Ý Ý / / / v/ /1d-1ß it V, V 1" , v7 V ~--_J I" I I" I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by (a)TRJAI/TY ¿All/II ANn ~lJJ2j)lAomplies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) 6< exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. Company Name LAw~ -4ND 6-A/!J)Ðfj Title 6-/'lVÐVl:L /I?~~ Date þtW~~y ~ ZG ) /.5 THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION Vendor Note: (a) Vendor: Company Name (b) Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" Ir-' f CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works 1-27-86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PW 86-2 Subject: Change Order #2 - Chapman Drive Paving & Drainage Improvements The purpose of this change order is to widen Chapman Road out to a 48' wide street near the intersection of Rufe Snow Drive. This widening will occur for a distance of approximately 1,100 feet east of Rufe Snow Drive and the developer on the northeast corner of Rufe Snow and Chapman is paying for this extra widening. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of change order #2 for the purpose of extra widening of Chapman Drive near Rufe Snow. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ _~ Department Head Signature f21Ito1~- City Manager , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM PaQe 1 of 1 y, .. -- I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I (' I KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 13, 1986 Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-334, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CHAPMAN DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPVTS., CHANGE ORDER NO.2 Enclosed is Change Order No.2 to the referenced project which has been executed by the Contractor, APAC-Texas, Inc. This change order covers the extra cost for adding a turn lane in the section of Chapman Drive between Rufe Snow and the Richfield Addition. We would note that the pavement section between Little Ranch Road and Meadow Road will be reduced in width as required to clear the existing fence on the north side and power poles on the south side. This reduction in pavement quantities will help offset the increase in quantities covered by this change order. The quantity reductions in the section between Little Ranch and Meadow Road are not covered in this change order, but they will be reflected in the final contractor's estimate. Upon Council consideration and approval of this change order please send a fully executed copy of the form to our office for further distribution. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this change order. ~adJÁ) RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. E.E. Alford, APAC-Texas 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I I I I I I I I I ¡ ~ , , I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 1-27-86 SUbject: Ratification of Payment to Walker Construction Company in the amount of $47,631.60 for Pay Estimate # 1 on Flory Street Improvements Agenda Number: PAY 86-4 This partial pay estimate #1 was processed too late to get on the last Council agenda and the payments are due within l5 days after they are submitted. Therefore, the payment had to be made prior to this Council meeting. Funding Source: 09-00-27-6700 09-00-27-6750 13-00-27-6150 $ 720.00 $45,471.60 $ 1,440.00 Recommendation: The staff recommends to ratify the payment of $47,631.60 to Walker Construction Company. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ ~ Department Head Signatu e CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM GO & REV Acct. Number See above S~fiCi~dS Available - ~? ~~-- K11L~ City Manager , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 1/· Ie I I I I I I I --. I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 8, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-219, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FLORY STREET PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS WATER, SEWER, STREET, & DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR I S PART IAL PA Y ESTIMATE NO. 1 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.1, dated January 7, 1986, made payable to Walker Construction Co., in the amount of $47,631.60, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of December 24, 1985. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Scott Jenogan~ as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. Included in this estimate is Change Order No.1 for construction of an underground french drain, to relieve local groundwater surcharge, and a concrete cap over the sanitary sewer line which crosses Mackey Creek. The cost of this change order totals $6,580. This work is included in item numbers 47, 48, and 49 of the attached contractor1s estimate form. We are recommending approval of this change order based on the unit prices proposed by the contractor and noted on the attached form. We recommend that the total payment, in amount of $47,631.60, be made to Walker Construction Co., 4028 Daley St., Fort Worth, TX, 76118. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. " ,~ P.E. ~~D::: UJ~= $ewh ;" / J lfLfO, 0 0 7 Zo , 0 0 If-Sj if 7/ , &0 0\ ~ oß ~'b l{ ~. Cl' ~ 1 I " \. . '-- RWA/lld Enc 1 os ures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Scott Jenogan ../ r4r. lee Haness, Di rector of Fi nance Walker Construction Co. IIIIIC':"'" 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 1-27-86 Agenda Number: PAY 86-5 SUbject: Ratification of Payment to LCH Construction Company in the amount of 158,374.20 for Pay Estimate 6 on Morgan Meadows East Drainage Improvements This partial pay estimate #6 was processed too late to get on the last Council agenda and the payments are due within l5 days after they are submitted. Therefore, the payment had to be made prior to this Council meeting. Recommendation: The staff recommends to ratify the payment of $l58,374.20 to LCH Construction Company. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other 13-00-51-6150 Acct. Number SUffjCi~ndS AV~ilable. ~ ~/c /'. ~ . 7'. C57 . Kf/l/~ City Manager GO , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 r~ Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I" I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 7, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-317 B , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MORGAN MEADOWS EA T D IN GE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.6 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.6, dated January 7, 1986, made payable to L C H Construction Co., in the amount of $158,374.20, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of December 31, 1985. The quantities and conditions of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd J.1cCallum, as indicated by his signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $158,374.20, be made to L C H Construction Co., P.O. Box 227, Decatur, TX, 76234. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month1s estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have ;concerning this project. &~UJ~ ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. ~ _."rl '. 'M"C; J- D t~ .M~tt.1 f~ /.\. R~JA/ll d Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector > r~r. Lee Maness, Oi rector of Fi nance ~ L C.H Construction Co. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267.3367 I, I I I I I I I I I , I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Uri 1 i ty 1-27-86 Council Meeting Date: Subject: Ratification of Payment to Mid-State Utilities, Inc. in the amount of $62,039.36 for Pay Estimate #1 on Cardinal Lane Water Extension Agenda Number: PAY 86-6 This partial pay estimate #l was processed too late to get on the last Council agenda and the payments are due within l5 days after they are submitted. Therefore, the payment had to be made prior to this Council meeting. Recommendation: The staff recommends to ratify the payment of $62,039.36 to Mid-State Utilities, Inc. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ Departm~nat~re . I) CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM REV Finance Director Page 1 of I V· ~ I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I f I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 9, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-548, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CARDINAL LANE WATER SYSTEt,1 EXTENSIONS CONTRACTOR1S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.1 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Estimate No.1, dated January 9, 1986, made payable to Mid-State utilities Inc., in the amount of $62,039.36, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of January 8, 1986. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Scott Jenogan, as indicated by signature on the original submittal, and we have'checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $62,039.36, be made to Mid-State utilities Inc., P.O. Box 1160, Waco, Texas 76703. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. /)~ ;' ,- ~,--- cJ~0 ~ro3 .5'ro,+þ! . , :') , ,'¡) RWA/lld Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Scott Jenogan, utilities Inspector Mr. Lee Haness, Di rector of Fi nance '+ if HIS COpy FO~ Mid-State utilities Inc. 't ~ ~ 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267.3367 , I ~ ~ ~ Source of Funds: _I Bonds (GO/Rev.) i' Operating Budget !~Other ¡ , I .- I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 1-27-86 Agenda Number: PAY 86-7 SUbject: Ratification of Payment to Austin Road Company ill the amount of $85,6l7.30 for Pay Estimate #3 on Municipal Complex Site Improvements This partial pay estimate #3 Was processed too late to get on the last Council agenda and the payments are due within 15 days after they are submitted. Therefore, the payment had to be made prior to this Council meeting. Recommendation: The staff recommends to ratify the payment of $85,617.3Q to Austin Road Company. Finance Review GO & REV Acct. Number 13-90-01-6150 SUfficie~ Available ~11~~U .. City Manager , , Finance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 ~I'/ ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 7,1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 33{¡; - ~ 3 7 5 Re: 3-335, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MUNICIPAL COMPLEX SITE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.3 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.3, dated January 7, 1986, made payable to Austin Road Co., in the amount of $85,617.30, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of December 31, 1985. The Quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $85,617.30, be made to Austin Road Co., P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113. Along with a copy of this lette~, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any Questions you may have concerning this project. cr $.J-D:= 8t,737.ý-j Wo..1h .:: g 77· gc¡ P.E. RWA/lld Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector (Street & Drainage) ~ Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance ,/ Austin Road Co. -, ~ 4..._ . r.. ~ ''4\ ""~ 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3361 I I f I I I I I I -. I I I I I I I t- I City of J(ðrth Richland Hills, Texas MEMORANDUM JANUARY 23, 1986 TO: Rodger Line, City Manager FROM: Richard Royston Director of Planning and Development SUBJECT: Quinten's Crossing Apartment Complex Request of Chasewood Development for relief of Masonary Fence requirements On March 21, 1983 Cross Roads Development Corporation submitted Zoning Application PZ 85-19 requesting rezoning from LR Local Retail to PD Planned Development on a tract of land located on the north side of Loop 820 immediately west of Richland High School. The Planned Development Site Plan proposed the construction of an apartment complex to be known as Quinten's Crossing. In the deliberations with the applicant the Planning and Zoning Commission raised the issue of a screening fence to surround the project, specifically the north and east sides most closely associated with the school property. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning request including the Planned Development Site Plan with the stipulation that the screening fence be of masonary construction and six feet in height. Also on March 21, 1985 the City Council held a public hearing on PZ 83-19. The Council also discussed with the applicants the requirement for a screening fence to be included in the Site Plan. On March 28, 1985 the City Council continued its deliberations on the Planned Development rezoning request and Site Plan. The City Council approved Zoning Application PZ 85-19 and the accompanying PD Site Plan with the stipulation that a SIGHT BARRING FENCE on the north and east property lines be erected as-a-part of the approved Site Plan. The current owners of the tract are requesting the City Council to allow the construction of a wooden stockade-type fence in lieu of the rnasonary fence stipulated by the Planning and Zoning Commission. (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 16118 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I c THE CHASE\VOOD COMPANY A Trammell Crow Residential Company January 17, 1986 City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Attn: Roger Line - City Manager Richard Royston - Director of Planning & Development Re: Site Barring Fence - Quinten's Crossing Apartments Zoning Application Case #PZ83-19 Dear Sirs: We would like to request permission to be placed on the City Council agenda of January 27, 1986. The reason for this request is to clarify the issue of the screening fence at Quinten's Crossing Apartments, according to the wall and fence Zoning Ordinance No. 24.13.3 of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas. This ordinance stated that a stockade type wood fence may be used in place of a masonry fence. We would like to bring this subject open for discussion at the Council Meeting. Should you require any additional information, or have any questions, please feel II free to contact myself, or Phil Heimerman, Project Manager. I Cordially yours, THE CHASEWOOD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY o I ~htJ:eßJ~ I I ,- I Vice President TM/vlc Dallas.' Fort VVorttì DivIsion 251 O'Connor Ridge SUite 200 Irving, Texas 75038 214-570-570ì