Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1986-02-10 Agendas ..CJrT....t[UJ ,.... C-I AG I "."" . I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I - Page 20 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 14. PZ 85-67 / PZ 85-67 APPROVED ( ( Chairman Bowen stated it does better fit the zero lot line zoning. This gives more protection, but it allows homes with small lots and puts a 1,2 square foot minimum instead of the 1,000, requires them to have gar es, and they can be attached or de ched. The motion carried 4-0. Request of Clifford A. rezone Tract lA, Tho as Sprouse Survey, Abstract 1 9, from its present classifi ation of AG (Agriculture) 0 R-3 (Single Family). This proper is located on the south side of B sey Road and the west side of Doug sLane. Cha~an Bowen opened the Public H~ring and called for those wishing .~ speak in favor of this request to ~. please come forward. // Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward. He said to the south of this property is R-3 zoning, to the west is Commercial, and across the street is in Keller and they request a zoning change to R-3. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to· speak i~ opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Bear:.lu~. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-67. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together but would be voted on separately. I ',- . I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I Page 21 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 15. PZ 85-68 16. PZ 85-69 ( ( Request of Earl McKinney, Trustee to rezone a portion of Tracts 1 & IB, E. A. Cross Survey, Abstract 281, and a portion of Tract 3, William Cox Survey, Abstract 321, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Family). This property is located east of Davis Boulevard and bounded on the east by Stonybrooke Addition. Request of Earl McKinney, Trustee, to rezone a portion of Tracts I & IB, E.- A. Cross Survey, Abstract 281, _and a portion of Tract 3, William Cox Survey, Abstract 321, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to C-l (Commercial). This property is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard and west of Stonybrooke Addition. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward. He stated this tract fronts on a a major highway, Davis Boulevard. He said they have requested a buffer of R-3 between Stonybrooke and the request for Commercial. Mr. Stembridge said the area requested for Commercial has a lot of drainage problems and would not be suitable for sjngle finnily. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Donald Chaille, 8405 Timberline Court, came forward. He said he was speaking for the residences in Stonybrooke and on Odell Street. He stated that they previously asked for Commercial on the entire tract. I Page 22 ( p & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 I f I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I ( Mr. Chaille said the property owners are against these requests because they want to protect their property value. He said there is already enough Commercial on Davis Boulevard, plus the traffic is bad now and this would make it worse. Mr. Chaille said nothing has changed, the neighbors protest both requests and request the entire 15 acres be restricted to R-2, residential. He said R-3 will not be good enough, 7500 square foot lots instead of 9000 and 1400 square foot houses instead of 1600. Mr. Cnaille read an article from the Star Telegram regarding problems in North Richland Hills. He said he felt this would be spot zoning. Mr. Chaille asked what the Master Plan shows for this area and asked why couldn't this area be developed as R-2 Single Family. He said he had submitted petitions on both cases and requested a show of hands of those who were in opposition to these requests. P. C. McGreggor came forward. He said the only reason Davis Boulevard is going Commercial is the Commission is granting it. He said it will soon be another Belknap Street. Mr. McGreggor said in Dallas and Fort Worth there are busy highways with nice homes on both sides so why·can't they build R-2 Single Family homes on this entire tract. Mr. McGrp~~or said Mr. Burk Collins was in previously with property to the south of this property and he was told he would have to take care of the drainage; will this property drain onto the property Mr. Collins had. Mr. Royston said the developer must take care of the drainage on his site and the adjacent area. Mr. McGreggor said he is against these requests. I Page 23 p & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 r ~ I Ie I I I I I I Ie ,I I PZ 85-68 DENIED I PZ 85-69 DENIED I I I I t' ( Chairman Bowen said he does not feel this would be spot zoning because there is Commercial all along Davis Boulevard. V. L. Gibson, 8333 Odell Street, came forward. He said he had lived here for 33 years and he believes it is spot zoning and feel they should keep Commercial away from residential. Mr. Gibson said they have 28 acres of Heavy Industrial to the south of his property and this would make Commercial to the north. He said they have retail across the street and in- between is residential. Mr. Gibson said they are only asking R-3 for 270 feet of the 1000 feet which is no buffer. He said he felt this was going against the Master Plan. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Bowen said he was not sure R-3 was a good plan for the small tract because there was no entrance to it. Ms. Nash made the motion to deny PZ 85-68. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried "3-1 with Mr. Tucker voting against denial. Ms. Nash made the motion to deny PZ 85-69. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 3-1 with r.hairman Bowen voting aga;"~t- ~o"i~l. Chairman Bowen stated the next tw requests would be heard to er but voted on separatel 17. PZ 85-70 I .. Roger & Joan Hanson to zone Lot 4, Block 1, Martin Addition, from its present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family). This property is located west of Precinct Line Road" and adjacent to Nob Hill Addition. I Ie I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I , I '" (; KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas May 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZON!~G CASE PZ 85-69 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AS TO C-1 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 70 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ta~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, ~ity Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 85-69 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I" ," . I Ie I SIGNlTURE DATE _ ADDRES~,L.. ~.--- -.----.--..--..---.--ç~~~ 6.?t~- z:- ._~:._---,- 'i-~--, .7¿fa---_..--______þ_=-2J.S- .. ~9b L/ ~ ~, _ Ivn-~ û a "j /- ¿,._ (1'-5- ~;;¿cr~~_____.____._.. "~~~:-..-;¿¿-:~./~.-J... --_._--~~ _ s;;-¿.. ----- - c¡ -1 7 . d¿¡! ¿ ._ I ~.. -.,-,-----~~. ~~~~ ~ . ï:. u'~:ß" d"""_ ¿-/~~5? YJ:ì;i ff~~~' ~ 1 )}1ð~L'-! ~a/~~/l~,:~.-.-.,,'ll ~.,.,~_. __~¿-~~...& ;~j;~.2-· ~I~'('~ . _f~~ ~. ;.~~.w..~"~. ..'_.'_'._ ~ - / ;- i , ~ - Ð ~ / ¿' '" '--J (:::T~.vj~J ~J:- ~0 f /^(,¡/.~.,-:" ~_. ______~__.~_ . ~ -~.-:!:.:_-~.~----. --~.- o K /J~~ ¿'j~..~' . ~. .:/-:;~ÞI..¿ It ¿;;~__.-¡;~ 1 K. .( -. :',:..:,;L_ :. .c:- . ",/.1 'F__ · / _ _ __ . l /.' (. .' - - .__¿<: . - I.")."""" '- '.... f" 1 ~1'1 To: Ci ty Council It¿ I q % Date: City of North Richland Hills Case: # 85-69 We, the residents living within 200- of subject property in PZ 85-69, object to the rezoning of said tract to C-l Commercial for the following reasons: This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. ¿, --/3 - ~ g,' .,J-l· ~ .k-.. .... /2. -/ J ,,' . ~'" / ,¿"1A ~.- ettt-""7 -? ..... _./:? /} ,,~~,. ~.' -- ~ ".,. ,',,, ....,. ....~...,- -~.'. .",..ol.... -......~,......'".................~.........._'~ c5 --/,2 ,/;;- ~...? 0 /... ~,k...__._____-., ..' ,'. ...~-- .... "-.- . - -. - . ~ -..---- . -..-..-..-2~.._..:..... ..:... : :~-:;~:£¿...___.,__......_._____ I 1'-'-- .------..-.... I ...---..-..-..-- ,. I ...........-.-. .......- ..----...................... .._~ .......-......................... ...............-..1i...............................-.............._~.............. ~ . - ........ .. - .......... ~.....,..,..-. --..--., ~............. .".....-.-...--........-..........--........... ----.-.. .---- .- -....... '''- ..__..._.~. ,-_. - ,..--- ,. 1 I .. ...........-........-....- _... - .·400·._J>,.,.'..~........... ._.~.........................."".. ~~ --------..---.-.....- .-..- '.. .... --.- -_._----------- -. ....-.-........---...-------....:---.-....-.--...-. -"-"-'" ...--...--. r-- I "-. --.-"'-"- ." . ~ .. - . .............. -' -,~"'" .,....-_.".~"... ¥ .....- .'........-... .-...... -.. . -. . -. .. -. -. '" - -, --. -- -.. ..- -. .-..,,,...-.-............-......-...... .......-.... .--"'---..---..- _.__.~.. - "-" . -...-.-.--.- .....-----....... ..... ~...._... ...~...!"-.".. ............ --_·_·~v·.,,¡ -........».....__ ~"""""""'-" ..1..." ......w...,_.. -.-.............~... '-'---'-". .- . .'. , - ...---.-. ..~--...._.__. ... _........ ..........-...............- '-~.........~.,----- ~.-....,.- ..~ . _ .'Þ ~........... ... ..._ _ _ .... ..__.____............-.-.. .........~__..........~¿.-.-.._~.......__....__~....-..........__~_~~~...... ................ ".........................-...............,-.............-. "'17" A.....,...... ............... JI.......~-- r .. ~..........-...-........- .~...........~. ~ . ...~....- ~. ~_ "I.... ..41..... ...................-.......~............... "'___ ---- -------.--.--...- ..---. -~ -'. ...---....---- .--. -.......__.._,...~--_.._.-. '~ ..-..........--.......-..-.........--------.- .:......~~ .. "'..-..-...--~............... .... -...~._,.. ~---.... ----..,...............--.-... .... - I..' ". ".' ;,... Òit ~ Y . . ,. I Ie I I I I I I II I I I I I I I , I t -/~- c¡~- 3.~ ~/ Dates- ~ Case: PZ -85-68 & 85-69 We object to the rezoning of said tract in PZ85-68 to R-3 for the following reason; To: City Council City of North Richland Hills An R-3 designation will adversely affect the property values of residents nearby where classification is R-2 We alsó object to the reclassification of property in PZ85-69 to C-1 for the following reasons: This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNlTURE . DATE ADDRESS .. . ._._k.'-7-g~~,.__...~e·'fL~~·~d .. __._ ._~.~_~~_~~_.___..fcL(d_d~___: ~'/I£' - / þ.. þ ~. {i/Jl (¿': £Y¿:~í../-c--~ __ . 0-t:?~J.~. .. ._ (-?7~ [~:~." Z¡'L~.' ~~-._._,_._______ I . /;1 "... ,.:_._¿.';(Ldd~ (:;:{----/?~j¿~[{:uc:-e~. _.._. ._._4_:,7::,~...s:.. . _.# .. ~.2.z.¿_~C:y~~ß-... ~ª~.__.________f.~.JÞ~-I_~__-.Æ'I {0 .._~¿~.~~ ~ êd ._,__ ..::/1:: KL F'f.:;Œ~~l~~_~ ..( =(/ __.fS--- .. .lVl '.- ¡;""I$~G.-/¿C ~ ----dJ;.:;--1J05~,. .. ............ t_.=/C.-~f=_,"._!~~~", e:/-;_._. J4/lJ---/)' ß~ - .¿_·=ll-. ?S--=--f'f5$ -.;{~,L~,~~. ..æ:- -(k: ~~Q~: .(.--¿/~tJ.:£=ßN£J~~~.~: -"'~7f'-'-- -'-' .. 6' :-//=J J-.----.~~4-d~ Ä~___ _~¥.--~_. -.-"~_'___' _..... ......___._~~~-:8S- 9'1;).; cZ. ~. ;;-:;';:::;LÝò r d..-..¿______,__6_-:~/ is- R.rj/.;¿ rß~~tfr::L~/.-J /)L T /)" ~~.~--'~~~.~ ~ - 1~ I /, 7 .-" ~ ,(~" r ./1~ ) f. - {~- '- '. ~ ~ '+0, -'. , f}..""" '1.., , 'fhl \ . , ..J' 0 .,.j J Jþ........~ ¿ j¿, \, . .: - , - " - -.:-...-.- ,/.1Z~ -'../~~-------'-~=~:-::.~~ 7~ ~ ~~ .12- _ ¿( ~ L/ ./ .//. LQL-----? -" ("'::. /'7./) / ¿ t? ~ ';.~j J'!L~ ..¿. ~~~/ j' JÎi¿~" " ----.--.---.-~.-._;.----:;;,~:-~~- - -~~-¿¡¡~-"(¡ ~~!>- ~ -/b~-- GL'-J' /(7~~~-----__·-b--L-:::.·L~---:-:)/ C- ~.~ /~~ /?~~o~·tr-,··· ~ .A6.//.4#4~'~~ ____6 -/1: 15 ¿Ä?:> v$rð~.Gh,~~t/~I~ ~ mLM'h._I-/~· ...~~~~ ..__ k-..-:-j!_.-=-L-___8..2~ ()j~ß /t'~"7Ùt4 ~~d/) ~...'..-' _ Ør;. .. ''''_''0. _" (,-/~-1 1,' ~I \ ~4TO: City Council Dilte:- ~ I .11 City of North Richland Hills .. Ca.s.=: PZ -85-68 & ~ ~ 35-69 v~ 'Lc tve object to the rezoning of said tract in 1>235-68 to R-3 for th(~ follo1.>lÏng ~, ~ \ reason; I ~ ~~l An R-3 designation will aàvcrsely affect the prOp2rty values of ~D~ fJ residents nearby \-lhere classification is R-2 1 ~~-r, t'le also object to the reclassification of IWoperty in PZfJ~¡-6') to C-1 ',;g\\~<,\ for the following reasons: -1 / ø,; A:I This rezoning Nould not be conducti ve to public safety, heal th, I l.J1. ~e.. · 11~' convenience, comfort, prosperity, or yeneral welface of th.~ ~I \. present neighborhood. ~ ,\ DATE ADDHI::.'.j~3 ~.f,' 1 I I ... A7~ ~ lG- 111/ 5r BIt f ~ It ~"-', :~/. / I ~~, I-G . ~L(.~~ ..J~", · LO' I ~4~L ~._~ .. .~-........... I I I 1 I I' I I~ ' '.,,'::~,~. I '1 I ¿"~I 0"85 ~-!O~~ç b-ID-~- h-JO-f~ fR -( 0 /K ç t-/ð-ð'S- ~ -/~-?, b--/tÞÝ-~ t '- / êJ- ð-ç 6-- /0 -fr- Ib- /;t- ð-5- .... --.--.~ --....-..-.. --,. -- ............ .. . .1..__ ____----.-_-.._.__ __ "_. _ - ---"-.. .---- '- -.- ....... -...- --"""'_.r_. _......_.__ -.......~---...._--- -.-----...--..--. - -.-- ...... -. .., ..-.........-...-..--.-..---..-. - . ....... .. . _..~_.-.~- --,....--.--- "'..-- ......-...-. --...-~.~.... -'.' .....- .... -..-.... - . -...... .... -'---..--------_.~-- -...- -. '---------.-. J 13~ -S '1/33 ?~s-..s~yhrroke - 7/25 S~ Hf),to '7/ d-5 S~ ~ £l, . .. J/t//6 ~~ÁJ-? .. 7/~ ðTcN tE:( 131ðo~ ~~r~~Ør~~ 7~ 5Tt?Y ~y¿p~ 11;LY sw;r;f fihl)/( Òr, 7/2/ J-:??: rtk~~:~/r 4 ~ ......-...- ....-.. . - -.... . . ..-----. . -.-.... .. --. ...- I,,: : -<'" '\ .. , ., ,~' I Ie 1 1 1 1 I .lfo I' II 1 . . ."_.. ~"____,.......~.__...... I 4~.''''''''''''''''.._,,,,,,,,_~_ - ~.-._..- ---. - -. -.-.-. -- --... . - '. .'. -.'--'. ~ - - ... -- -..-.. ... ,. ---.-.- ......~.- "- . -_._---~ - I ___..___ I -----.. I ----...-...---.------...--..------_____ I 1 I ,~ I -----------. .----..----------..- ------.------. To: City Council City of North Richland Hills {-/5-1:. ~~' Þ I Date:- ~ Case: PZ -85~68 & 85-69 for the following We object to the rezoning of said tract in PZ8S-68 to R-3 reason; We also object to the reclassification of property in PZ8S-69 to C-l for the following reasons: This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. An R-3 designation will adversely affect the property values of residents nearby where classification is R-2 SIGNlTURE . DATE ADDRESS ~ '¿ (t--¡--; - ~L/ ? // . fir 2::./~ /, · ¢:) 'L.~~~;?:~ ~:'. /~~' _'. _~_ -:LL :L~---_.__~"þ~~ V I<:"U- (. ,?' ..- d.. ,~ ._, _ _ / . ø. ?L~....- ")t. . ~~...- ... ...~ -,j..(~_7L.-?.__.----.j)-!i.../_t-=t. :?~. ..0:t.t--/./~k..~~.' t~r .~;r /'':_-~,/ ;/..---' ~-:.) · tI It (, - / / - 6-r- 7/ ð 'l )¿~ o~ lb ~ ~rc~:Á.1..-C.....~'-':.,./...J../~·~._yt...J · !._.~." j. 6'::"'<."~''''~~~ ~ \ / J -(, ,p. /) _ f ~ , _ 1 ..~ . ;/Ç)/ " /'.,/ -,. ~ ., .-.... ~..... ',- '" ,,' . # . ' . . .':/2'/.,.t. ~/L",« . ,-,,~,: /:'-""': - /. ·<:.Ù?.J..._..., ::'~:'. . ..::' ~ --;s:-..... . .. __ .L.~¿Cf c.._--..1"'::':£..-~t.":':';...::;k......~ .!- . ~ '" .-;::::: - '-', ' '~I:"'" ." -.,., -. " ..... '"' '..,. ..::::'> f\. r, ~ '--.J SJ ....) ,. 17>. "'z <:;) L · , " (;. , , "- ~\ ~ "'" XJ'.,.....,~; (" ': P", -:--~~---~:--<..:::-""'-'~---"_---.. ::_- -~..-~- --______._~ .' h .'. .-.--------------.-.. .---..- .----..--..-- -..---.... - .......-..._~ ;---.....---...,. .,.. ---a----___ ..., -". -.....-.- .- .. ......... ~ .. ... ...... Jt#~~ . ....~~ 4- _._............. ~...... -:---~...........-....-__...... ·...·.4...,. .~~ -.....- ------ ---- .. ..... -... " ,," .,- ..-. ..~.... --~. _ --.... _. -... _. .-.... .--. ----. .._.._..~--.._..~_.........._.__..._~ .--... ---.... .-. .. . ," -... .. .. r-.... ...--..---.-....-_ -....ø__._.. ._:...,. _.... ....... ......_~ ............þ.~~ ~ .,. .. . ~.... ............... --~.~............ ....... ... - .. -.-.-..-..,......... ..................... ...-...................... --- ~~--------.......-...............,.. .J..-_ ..........._..,..~ ... _,..... ....~.._'....'I;'"... . . '.... --_. .... -.... .-...-..---..-....~....-...... ~ . - ...-...------- .......... ~~.;~.;..~~~ ----- -.--- --...-- ---.-..-----. - - .. ~........- .......--.... --- ~.._---- . -----~---v- ... ----. -. --. "",-.-...-.-.... ....-.--..-.---.--.-.--- .......................... ~ ... .---..._-- --..-------.- . T I I , 1 1 1 I 1 1 ~ I I I I I 1 I ~ 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1272 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-69 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to c-l. BEING a tract of land situated in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being part of the E. A. Cross Survey, Abstract 281, and the William Cox Survey, Abstract 321, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at the southeast corner of the E. A. Cross Survey, Thence North 89 degrees 36 minutes West, a distance of 270.00 feet to the point of beginning of the herein described tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 36 minutes West a distance of 757.30 feet to a point for corner in the east right-or-way of Davis Blvd. (F.M. 1938); THENCE North 18 degrees 27 minutes East along the said east R.O.W. of Davis Blvd. for a distance of 240.00 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 18 degrees 11 minutes East for a distance of 5.30 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius o¡ 1848.99 feet; THENCE along said curv~ to the right and with the east R.O.W. line of Davis Blvd. for a distance of 5G1.75 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 36 minutes East for a distance of 439.80 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 01 degrees 12 minutes 41 seconds West, a distance of 733.00 feet to the point of beginning and containing 10.4925 acres of land, more or less. I I , I I I I I I ~ I I I I I 1 I f' I Page 2 This property is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard and west of Stonybrooke Addition. DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1985. CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-69 IS HEREBY REZONED C-l THIS 26th DAY OF AUGUST, 1985. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL ITY : REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY C::7 OF "r~C~7I1 R~C~~LAND II::L: I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development SUbject: 2/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Request of T.J. Petroleum Inc. to Rezone a Portion Agenda Number: PZ 85-135 ot Tract A, BloCk ~~, Clearv1ew Addit10n trom ~_~ to C-2 SU ORDINANCE NO. 1339 This Zoning Application is presented on an existing Service Station-Car Wash-Convenience Store located on the southeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Birchwood Drive. The requested rezoning is from C-2 Commercial to C-2 SU Commercial Specific Use-Sale of Beer for Off-premises Consumption. The applicants wish to sell package beer in conjunction with their convenience store operation. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of Zoning Application PZ 85-135 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract A, Block 22, Clearview Addition from C-2 to C-2 SUo This hearing before the City Council is in appeal of that denial. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available K 1;(/~ nt Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director Paqe 1 of _~ I fû Z. es-/3.:5' \ \ r . , AG: \ F:~~ . I t I I I \ ú~ ' ~ ' ~C-I ¡ ~'-------.J I F.~ ~ ~/ ~' I ,,-- '" ~ / - --.... ~,~ l I R-7-MF 'v~, , .\.Ì~ \' T \ I ,~ . \ \ \ \ ,. ~ ~~ ~~ O~ ~ 2 - 2 ,- 8S 1087. f090. 109'. 1092 1093. 1094. 1095, 1096 1097. 1100, H04. 1105 tl06, tlOi. lIOB, H09 .. .' ( . ... I I f I 1 1 I I ,I Ie 1 I I I 1 I 1 t' I Page 20 P & Z Minutes November 14, 1985 ( ( Chairman Hearing. Chairman Bowen state area has very limited acce since there is not an access to ecinct Line Road. He said he i ot in favor of the R-4 zonin 16. PZ 85-133 DENIED 17. PZ 85-13 APPR D ~ r. Schwinger made the motion to deny PZ 85-133. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion to deny carried 4-1 with Mr. Wood voting against denial. 18. PZ 85-135 Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-134. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 3-2 with Chairman Bowen and Mr. SChwinger voting against. Request of T. J. Petroleum, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tract A, Block 22, Clearview Addition, from its present classification of C-2 (Commercial) to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. This property is located at 4940 Davis Boulevard. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please Come forward. Tommy InglisJ 4940 Davis Boulevard, came forward. He said they 'Wish tc sell off premise beer. Ch,~:f ~_:::" .sov;c~ c'::'::_l fu.. chub'" wishing to speak in oPposition to this request to please come forward. Dr. M.S. Satyanarayana with an office on Davis Boulevard, came forward. He said he was opposed to this request because he must clean up the area now. He said he picks up beer cans and coke cans. Dr. Satyanarayana said he is opposed to the traffic it would create. He said he is opposed to the snow cone stand that is across the street. . . '. ..,¡(..... '.&... '~f~·~,,, ~ -<-..;. ~~-'..:-.. - . I I (' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I -"'J-er.._~ ". Page 21 ~ p & Z Minutes November 14, 1985 PZ 85-135 DENIED 19. PZ 85-136 - - ( He said he thinks there should be a law that there be no structures in front of a structure. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PZ 85-135. This motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Wood made the motion to deny PZ 85-135. This motion was seconded by Mr. SChwinger and the motion to deny carried 3-2 with Chairman Bowen and Mr. Hallford voting against denial. Mr. Wood asked about the snow cone stand. Mr. Royston stated it was a legal non-conforming use. Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. to rezone Tract D, Block 1, Meadow Lakes Addition, from its present classification of R-l ( Family) to R-2 (Single Famil property is located on th north side of Meadow Lakes Drive Lariat Drive. Chairman Bowen 0 ned the Public Hearing and c led for those wishing to speak' favor of this request to please me forward. ion Massey, Attorney, came forward Topreeent ~~chIT.oad Bay Dével0pment. He said he wanted to speak to all three requests, #19, #20, & #21. Chairman Bowen stated the Commission would rather hear #19 and then hear #20 & #21 together. Mr. Massey said they were all connected and he had rather speak to them all together. I Ie I . I I I I :1 I . I I I I I I I f I ( J KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas October 24, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ;~~~~~ ~~~~ :'l 8~-135 REVIEW LEI fER, ~~~IN~ ~~UM C-2 10 C-2-SU REt. UIILIIY SYSIEM GR1D SHEET NO. 123 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ¿/t/ ~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: f4r. ROdger N. Line, City t1anager !,~'- Gen e :: i~":: ~.::., Di fC .:tor of Pli:J ~ i c WOY' k s Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works r~. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 85-135 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283.6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I f'. ~,,~~~-::~:- ~ I I I I I~ I ~- ~ --=,"'t I I I I I t- I ì ., ? ~-- (? Z. 8 ~ - / .35 4I'..!JN L/./iI1/'/...s O¿1PLE J/~L:) /' £ # h/'/6'"HJýH?Y ~/-9.J'J .J ~'<:) -, -~ ~;;L '0 '-'.- '1'-- .~ '..1 Ç: ~ '~. ~ I l.-. ... ~ . ... : 1rt-. ','" ""'-;r1Z ... r' - I I it...., -.. ~~\. ! \\~ f,,\u ~ I I,.' ~-~ ~~ ~ I ~ t' I ~ 'b ltu -{ t ""-. ~ ',"" '. I ~ , '. . I I I ¡ I >< I ¡ I I j 1 I ~I ~ ~.I I ~ ~ I ¡' I I I I I ; I , ~1 i I ~\ I ¡ ~; ¡ ()! ; / , ~ ~~ ~š C\ 'i ~ ~~ I~ ~~ ~K ~ ~ \', ; \\ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I, ~ ~ /Y¿?/~ð¿ K //7~ , i /l"' rc~a " ~~~ ----1 ~ ~~~ I ,_~ ~ r~R~p _ I /-l.' / I., ~~ ~I . I" ~~ '., "'..í ~ -..J" ~ c.. a -c.... èJ! ~ ' ~PNP'" I . rs¿,AÞNP '. ~ r 1 : ..-1/\", ; - - - i. -- -0 0 ' I I~ I ..s~?' ~ J'é?-?" I j~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~Ì'\ :~ ~~ ¿¿~ c::. ~ r ~\ - ." "" \ J'!þ I /¿:~~ ~ ..... ' ~~... ~..... . , ..~ '. I I.: ~ ~ ~~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~~ : \ò ~ r: ~ ! I I I ,..... , ~ ~ ~ " '" ~~ ~ "<... ~ ~ ~ ~I .s~ ~~ @~.... ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~I ~t ~~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ : - ~ ~ \J- .31.... ". t) '1 I~ ' ø~ ~~ " .. ,~ ,~ . .~ ~"1t.. ~ """ , ~ t' ~\ , . ~ ~ '" J' []- ., .I?.. S I ! /~.( -...J':tr ~ ~., . (~ ~ ,- ~Q-s.. ,-.. ..5'.!J-2 I~: ~~.. ", '~ -"I "1" '" ~\~ ' ~~~ ~- \... ,,1'. ~ 'C~" ~ lee ~ " ~ '" r ~~ ~ " i ~I ~ ~ .~ ~,. ! I /~~ \ I I í0 J I I t ~ ~ ~ \ ~ I~ _..r·VZ?2~~~.$EM!!.Nr __ ____ ¿~~ '", ~ 'ot. -S¿7/~,?'~ E //R¿- 0) .~ ~. ~~ ) ~~ ,~ \ , ¡ I \ \ ¡ ~ ~ \~ .' ~ ft\ ~ ~ 1\\ /6' \\ ~~, ,~1 ~ I-"%... I ':Z.. ~~ ,Jl a J /f 1'"" " .I)~}r/" ~ !b~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~. tS~ ~ ~ '1 ~~ ~~ ,,~ ~'- I~ , I': f I I I' I 1 I' ~.... . .. I~ 1 t.~:·.. I·· . 1 I' I I.,..·..· t' I , ... . (- ( '\ J 4M ~ .. t o ~ to N 119t TOT",- D't!tT~NC." .. 4".5 BIRCH WOOD DRIVE en S; ð .. .,¡.Ú (,0 sas 8NAM~ STATIO" 9CALE".{.-4Q' 0# c; SKETCH SHOWING DISTANCES FROM SHAMROCK STATION AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BIRCHWOOD DRIVE AND DAVIS BLVD. AND THE CHURCH OF CHRIST BUILDING AT 5017 DAVIS BLVD. IN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. This plat was compiled from previous survey and from distances measured on the ground. ~~:?t~/2 Regist~red Public Surveyor No. 2014 Date "-.~¿) -8S ~..~ . ~ ~ OF ~..... . .:~......._~-+~, þ~.. ~ -.:!\S\' ..: W" -oil' ,...\.................:...~ \..~~T.~.Y!:.Yf.~; . "-0\ 2014 :9:, ~ ~. .. .'-Cj . . (9°·.!o, STt.~~t;;~--' . ~ I C· · · · · f · ~~ ~ .. .. ~ SU 1""~-" . _.Þ-. WA.RD SURVEYI " COMPANY ft. o. lOX 1au. ". '. POllY WOIIIM.· IIUS 76' 18 . .-..oN. AC 8'" 281-"11 " ..... "'. - "+.(.~ . .~.O(..;.~_. _. _...l.:;.:.L...:....~_ "...: ,:", _" I I , I I 1 1 I I ~ 1 I I 1 I' I 1 -- I ORDINANCE NO. 1339 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-135 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-2 to C-2-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. BEING a portion of Commercial Tract A, Block 22, Clearview Addition, Third Filing, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-25, Page 100, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said field notes covering a brick building on said tract: COMMENCE at an "X" cut in concrete at the Northwest corner of said tract, thence North 89 degrees 51 minutes East along the north line of said tract 57.2 feet and South 1 degree 06 minutes East 39.7 feet to the Northwest corner of the existing brick building; THENCE North 89 degrees 51 minutes East 25.2 feet to the Northeast corner of said building; THENCE South 00 degrees 09 minutes East 22.5 feet to the Southeast corner ' of said building; THENCE South 89 degrees 51 minutes West 25.2 feet to the Southwest corner of said building; ·111.~NCE No::-:-~ beginning. r, ..... ,..,.... ,... _-. ._ ~ -< ~ - b "- - - - ~ -.-: ~i..:::.:: ~ L ¿ b T'Y . .... '-V"" ...L....J reet Lu Lue p01n't of I I , I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I -- I Page 2 This property is located at 4940 Davis Boulevard. DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 14th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1985. æð~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION , BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-135 IS HEREBY REZONED C-2-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION THIS DAY OF , 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: .. -:ì'D't\T~Y I' I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 2/10/86 ubject: Request of Diamond Glen Joint Venture to Rezone Agenda Number: PZ 85-144 Part of Tract 2Al, 2A2, and 2A3 M. Lynch Survey Abstract 953 From R-8 to LR ORDINANCE NO. 1340 This Zoning Application is presented on the vacant residential tract located on the southeast corner of Dawn Drive and Glenview Drive. The requested rezoning is from R-8 Zero-Lot-Line Single Family to LR Local Retail. The applicant's stated intent is to develop a strip shopping center on the subject tract. The Staff noted to the Commission that the subject tract is a portion of the tract recently approved for rezoning to the R-8 District. The indicated purpose was for the development of a Zero-Lot-Line Residential project. The property fronts on Glenview Drive which is designated as a five lane undivided Major Collector Street. In the development of the property an additional dedication will be required from the subject tract and the applicants will be required to participate in the improvements to the street. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of Zoning Application PZ 85-144 reauesting rezoning on part of Tract 2Al, 2A2, 2A2A and 2A3, M Lynch Survey Abstract 953 fr~m R-8 to LR. This hearing before the City Council is in appeal of that denial. ~ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget er Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ;e~~ · Cit Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director - Paae 1 of 1 - I I f' I I I I !I I Ie I I I I IR c- 2 LR S U * I ' .. ~"'V .. IIII IJ 1 Page 10 ~ P & Z Minutes December 12, 1985 [ I -- 11. PZ 85-144 Request of Diamond Glenn Joint Venture to rezone part of Tracts 2Al, 2A2, 2A2A, & 2A3, M. Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, from their present classification of R-8 (Single Family-Zero Lot Line) to LR (Local Retail). . This property is located at the southeast corner of Glenview Drive and Dawn Drive. I I I Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. I I Bill Smith came forward. He said he was representing Bill Fenimore and himself. He said they were requesting Local Retail on the property that borders on Glenview. Mr. Smith said there is already a shopping center across Dawn Drive and they are asking for the same width. He said it is not feasible to have lots back up to Glenview. I Ie I Mr. Schwinger asked if there would be a street to the east. I Mr. Smith said there would be. I Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in oPposition to this request to please come forward. I Edmond M. Howell, 4033 Honey Lane, came forward. He asked ~hat kind of retail they pl~n to have there. He ask~d if there would be a restaurant such as Bpnnia~ns ther~. I Chairman Bowen stated there could be one there, but they would have to have a Specific Use in order to sell alcohol. I I -- I Mr. Howell said he would like to have a buffer. Chairman Bowen said Local Retail was a neighborhood type zoning and he read the list of things that could be put there. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ......~.J.-_~ ~.._..............,. ~ ..:....~_ _.. _ ...... .;. ~ ~ , - i4-.¡. ~... \- .~".ò_..~.. .__, ~ . ... ... _ _ 'oJ·..;.··~ ~ . . ' : _. _ I .. .. . ..., .1 ".. Page 11 ~ P & Z Minutes December 12, 1985 ( I rf' I Mr. Howell asked if it would increase his property value. I Chairman Bowen said he could not say. I Bud Austin came forward. He said he was a developer and felt it would increase the value. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. I Chairman Bowen said he did not think this was a good corner for retail. He said there is a large Local Retail across the street and also large Commercial across Glenview and he feels the R-8 was a good zoning for the property. 1 I Ie I PZ 85-144 DENIED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to deny PZ 85-144. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion to deny carried 4-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:20 P. M. I Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission I I Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I 1 I f1' I .......----.. - - _.~ .~......-...... - .......~~iI&~.~ . ....~y '. .. -..... ~ .... ...... ~.~........... - ~.. ~-::- '..-. r ....-..-:- ..;,:.~~__ ~ . I' I , I I I I 1 I l.- I I I I I I I " I ,r r. KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas November 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-144 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-8 TO LR -REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 147 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works t1r. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Pub"ìic Works ;;;- ô Ri ¡:hard RoystG,-., Di rector of Deve 1 opmen t Zoning Review PZ 85-144 1 Page 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I ,. I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I t" I pz. 35.,/¥f? GAREY W. GILLEY DON W. HICKEY C RICMARO DAVIS, ~R. F"RED M. MORRIS ESTABLISHED 18ao BROOKES BAKER SURVEYORS A PROF"ESSIONAL CORPORATION BROOKES BAKER (1902-'9~~) ~OHN F: BAKER, CONSULTANT S.~.BAKER,CONSULTANT TITLE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING BROOKES BAKER BUILDING -!511 E. BLUF"F" STREET 817-33!5-71!51 METRO -429-6119 F"ORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 November 13, 1985 Page 1 0 f 1 Field notes for zoning for: _ Part of the Mahala Lynch Survey, Abstract No. 953, situated in the City of North Richland Hills in Tarrant County, Texas. Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 1 in Block 1 of Nortex Addition in the City of North Richland Hills in Tarrant County, Texas as said lot appears upon the map recorded in volume 388-K, page 591 of the Tarrant County Deed Records in a line for the south line of Glenview Drive. Thence south no degrees-no minutes-35 seconds west, along the west line of said Block 1, a distance of 206-16/100 feet. Thence north 89 degrees-37 minutes west 540 feet to the east line of Dawn Drive. Thence north no degrees-no minutes-35 seconds east, along the saìd east line of Dawn Drive, 229-4/10 feet to the intersection of the said east line of Dawn Drive and the south line of Glenview Drive. Thence south 89 degrees-37 minutes east 38-67/100 feet to a point 10 feet from the face of curb of Glenview Drive. Thence easterly along a line 10 feet southerly of the face of said curb of Glenview Drive, for the said south line of Glenview Drive: along a curve to the left having a radius of 890 feet, an arc length of 206-79/100 feet to its end, the long chord of said 206-79/100 feet arc is south 83 degrees-02 minutes-15 seconds east 206-32/100 feet; south 89 degrees-41 minutes-38 seconds east 296-52/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 2-609/1000 acres. Prepared November, 1985 from previous survey. BROOKES BAKER SURVEYORS ~~N~~ Stephen H. Roberson ~·b .., ~ 0 F ~"f¥a, ~ ~~~........ (:..~ v L ~v-... /À.. ... '_>1 " c;".... ~~~ ·.~ü~, ~. ~ ..;: ~ . . . .: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . , C STEPHEN H. R08ERSON ,) ,. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · . ,....... f ,~... 4 0 9 0 .:/):, c".. ">t" -\,()..·,a~ ~ (;') ....(;, STt.ir'..:t:" y ~ (. I · · · . . · ~\.'i v . ",C su ¿Þ þ 'w~ - A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION TITLE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING BROOKES BAKE" BUILDING - ell E. 8LU II' II' aTRE£T 81?-3.3!5-?Iel METRO 42Q-ðl1Q FORT WORTH. TEXAS ?ðlOa BROOKES BAKER (I~02-I~!5!5) ..JOHN F. BAKER. CONSULTANT S...J. BAKER. CONSULTANT ""£0 M. MORRIS. CONSUL. TANT I I· , ESTABLISHED 1..0 GAREY W. GILLEY bON W. HICKEY C. RICHARD DAVIS. ..JR. BROOKES BAKER SURVEYORS I~ ,01. 9~8-/4~ . 57 ) \ tð ¡. 2ð ß/Þc.k 4- Ollt MONO .CH Aoo'r/l ".:'''';'.1 : t.ð ell IZ_/~"/ I . ~ I \1 I \~ ~ \: I \~ \ I \ ~~ ~~ ¿. 1:'. 38 ~I eJ·() z"/.s € ~, zOt:;, .III. " I -. ~, , $8':3_'J~ G LEN V, E W D~' V E 1 ð8 G:J _ - -'- - - I $ 8 'I- 4/- ,ð .. £, - - - J. - 20~ ~ z,~B \ ~, I Cf\ ~, Ie) ~ Proposed ilL R" zoning ." ~ ~ ~ 2 609 Ac. 540 N8~'11W z --~ ~ '" " " ',. ~ " G) e7 ~~ -- t:). 4 ~~ --' þ ~ ~ ~ --\) >(. ~ ,~ ~~ ~ --;~ ~~ __- C>, ~ 8 ~~~ ~ E'lCìS./¡;"J l2-ð Zør1'~ If) , ~. 't ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I $Cð/e..' / ¡/lc), :: Z ðtJ !et:1 I I . I so l G4~ N8, -37·W HARMONSON ROAD Sketch showing part of the MAHALA LYNCH SURVEY, Abstract No. 953 ~ituated in the City of North Rich1and Hills in Tarrant County, 'I exas . Prepared November, 1985. BROOKES BAKER SURVEYORS c? 7/- ~~ L_~ XI?9~ ." .,A.. ~ ~ f/III~t. OF )ã ~ If'" ..... \ · · · · .. , ~ t. .~ ,. ~r ..1t .. ~""f_ .. yj"'...... . ~,:,. ....;?\S" a 'It: .. .~ ·0 .'), ................ ., . STEPHEN H. p;::;·r-R·s·ÒÑ",) ,...:............~. .~.o.., ,~... 4 Ü ~ 0 ::~_, (:; o. .~ l" ":) .' Or.,". '..a. ()j ...~, S T ( r..~ . :- -\..-It f .. "I..,······ ,- ~ \,~ ... '....~ SU\~,. 'w" - II I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I ~', ORDINANCE NO. 1340 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-144 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-8 to LR. BEING part of the Mahala Lynch Survey, Abstract 953, situated in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwest corner of Lot 1 in Block 1 of Nortex Addition in the City of North Richland Hills in Tarrant County, Texas as said Lot appears upon the map recorded in Volume 388-K, Page 591 of the Tarrant County Deed Records in a line for the south line of Glenview Drive. THENCE South 00 degrees 00 minutes 35 seconds West, along the west line of said Block 1, a distance of 206-16/100 feet. THENCE North 89 degrees 37 minutes West 540 feet to the east line of Dawn Drive. THENCE North 00 degrees 00 minutes 35 seconds East, along the said east line of Dawn Drive, 229-4/10 feet to the intersection of the said east line of Dawn Drive and the south line of Glenview Drive. THENCE South 89 degrees 37 minutes East 38-67/100 feet to a point 10 feet from the face of the curb of Gle~view Drive. THENCE easterly along a line 10 feet southerly of the face of said curb of Glenview Drive, for the said south line of Glenview Drive: along a curve to the left having a radius of 890 feet, an arc length of 206-79/100 feet to its end, the long chord of said 206-79/100 feet arc is South 83 degrees 02 minutes 15 seconds East 206-32/100 feet; South 89 degrees 41 minutes 38 seconds East 296-52/100 feet to the place of beginning and containing 2-609/1000 acres. I' I r- I I I I I I 'Ie I I I I I I I -- I "., Page 2 This property is located at the southeast corner of Glenview Drive and Dawn Drive. DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 12th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1985. . ~, ¿~~1;~~~ s~ PLANNI~D ZÔN~G'kÕMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-144 IS HEREBY REZONED LR THIS 10th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: A¡TU~r.,r - I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: 2/10/86 Council Meeting Date: I I ~ Request of Branix Inc. to Rezone Lot 1, Block 31, Agenda Number: PZ 85-149 College Hill Addition from C-l SU to C-l SU Change of OWnership) ORDINANCE NO. 1342 This Zoning Application is presented on the existing convenience store located on the west side of Davis Boulevard at Smithfield Road. The requested rezoning is from C-l SU Commercial Specific Use-Sale of Beer for Off-premises Consumption to C-l SU Commercial Specific Use-Sale of Beer for Off-Premises Consumption. The applicants are requesting that the existing Specific Use Permit be transferred to the name of the new owner of the convenience store. The Ordinance requires that a new application for the Specific Use Permit be submitted whenever an approved location changes ownership. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-149 requesting approval of the change of ownership for the C-l SU Specific Use-sale of Beer for Off-premises consumption. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot r Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available R~r/~ , t Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Paoe 1 of I-I R-3 lOtO í/ , " I ' \\ \ '" I-I \', SU \ \ \ \ '~F.p. I , I , , . , , , I I I I I I t I I I . , I , I I I , t \ , , , AG 1 '\ F:~~ I : I I I \ I u R-3 I-I c; "\ ~-r.f, 'f ~o~ I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I " I Page 3 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 ( 2, PZ 85-149 ( Mr. Wood stated that bit by bit commercial was inching down into residential area. He said thi ot surrounded by residential 0 three sides. Betty Hysom to speak. allowed Hysom, 5105 Pearl Drive, came forward. She said she was Opposed to this request because it would create too much traffic. She said there is a new house being built on Pearl Drive so why couldn't this lot be residential. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hallford made the motion to deny PZ 85-148. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion for denial carried 5-0. Request of Branix, Inc. to rezone Lot 1, Block 31, College Hill Addition, from its present classification of "C-I-Commercial-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption (change of owner3hip). This property is located at the intersection of Smjthfield Road anù Davis Boulevard. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Sid Bratton came forward. He said they wish to purchase this property and get the license changed to their name. He said beer is already being sold there. I- . I ~ I I I I I I 'Ie I I I I I' I I " I ( Page 4 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 3. PZ 85-149 APPROVED PZ 85-150 PZ 85-150 APPROVED ( Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in oPposition to this request to please Come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 85-149. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Joe E. Gray to rezone Tracts 3W & 3Wl, T.K. Martin Surve Abstract 1055, from their presen classification of AG (Agricul e) to R-2 (Single Family). This operty is located on the south side f Amundson Road, west of Precinct ine Road. Chairman Bowen op ed the Public Hearing and cal d for those wishing to speak in f or of this request to please com forward. David arfield came forward to sent Joe Gray and Roger Hanson in this request and request #4. He this would be another part of Nob Addition and it would have the . same amenities as the present Nob Hill. Mr. Barfield said there would be approximately 1.40 lots. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opPositi0n to this request to please corne forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-150. This motion was seconded by Mr. SChwinger and the motion carried 5-0. I I f' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I " I ..../ -. .... ( \i KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, f NC. .", r \ CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 19, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richlônd Hills 7301 N.E. 'Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~ONING CASE PZ 85-149 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-I-SU TO C-I-SU REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 105 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enclosures CC; Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Mandger :'0.-. UCIlt.:: I'd do ì:, L; I t::'- tOt' u Î Puù 1 i (; wur k s Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoni.ng Review PZ 85-149 1 Page 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 ~ 0)'1) '\ / f - /~ V ~Cj .~~~: \. ~ 'f '- ~ / -; ~ / ~Q'! ~/ 'V fJi ~ ," ~ t~ / 'f ~ ~\ Q~ I rl I . I " : \ . . I ~ ~ t . , I , ! 11 ~f:.':4·: . .' " - ..-.. '~': I ;~1f',=\t .9.~..J}"'.. ....;..~~!.;.-.~..,.,.; '. ~~.~*...+.., ~ :~-~::,.tf . "...~..~ .~..\J' '-ÇJ~~.. .: ,4 , .. *, · '-'''''1:''' · ... · ... · · · · . · · · · · .. V ;. :. · ., . . .;:.~: . :'..... ~·DU..A.'Y » ~1t-: ;'''f~ ;;,~~ -;';:.·j;;1 . " .. ':.~ .r,~·.f., "".':.'i~'· ,~:. ,ft~!.F··sü~'t1Þ''' '.!~>.. :-..,-: ' -~ .: _.' .. '.'J. '. ~. ....... ~ ~- ... ra:~~.. 'HON£ WA 3·"35 OR WA 3-~ ;. ~ ..!-.i;.:.. -k.~~~~ ~""__._._ _. corlaly .hat .hi. map wa;(rupar..J IIODl 1..,ld lIul... (,I .... ,'~u.~1 ~urv"r UI"J.. by no.. or uncl..r my .upt·rv.:¡uU} on'" ull .t lI.a ÀhCl .,& .~,. CuH~C:I .Ut.j PtCJ~rly I,.d.cah:d ,to It.t, Lu~' t..1' m)' ~n"w);d. . ',r.d tl4:l..., 'I hll'" Qfu no ttUCI0\2('hm",nl:l _ ø- )t c ~ ,.. i A J' J".I.I ~ . . ", DA', _ g..~~,~ ~~~ . .-..- -- .- . ... .., -. -l~ I r' .' ,1 0 / ."eJ I - ~ ~ pz g5-/$L~ ..a... U "¡W ;;qf 2 2- r , r I t ~. f ~ ~ \ , i f J I Bu;nya tlad or pOIL,,1 of lund ou-t oftht! J.Ii. '8qrlough ;urvt.::Y, Abstract 1130, situated in Ta ont County, Tðxas, and h..iIl9 nlO"~ particuJurty de~c,.¡bt~d Lv metøs' und bounds os fo"cy,¡'): BEGINNING at an iron pill in tha fa,r R.O.Vl. line of ,mith. f;t ld I~oad (County ¡{ood #3004), saidpointbøing,Soutl., 597.9 fa.:!t from the SouthVvc~t conh.''' of a trnct or landcQnvl:y..j fmrn Lou;o L. Chopman to Lottie BarLicr and A .l. Barb;ùr, (I. ..ecordl!¡L in Vol. 367.1, pa9~ 369, Deed Rt~(;ords, Tarront County, Texe)); HfFl'-JCF fa. I, 16.5 "r~d 100'1 ;'011 pin;n tho WtUI~rIt ;IIC of r)( 1\,' i.. Jiuu f . · Y it. I' ( I . I.', ! ~ uud ,/ ,,) ~US t ; III! ",IC I :)uull,tjl Iy ulollg U \ lh IfU to Illu 'uff Ihat I.( ~ ( I,Ji~\ uf 291 ·1. 79 fe~l, f1..J i:> I elf IC I! 0 f 283 . 3 f 6"t to an iron pin ( t ~h(J "-"- j" I c'-See! j 011 0 f I h(! F()~ t R. 0 . ','.1 0 f Sm; thf; lilt d Rood; THLï'-JCi: !'Iorth, ~6A feet 10 the Point .of BF.GINNIt-JC. .., ",," . .'. SCALI ¿,. : Jt? ~. . ...--if. 'f:' J. R. DUNAWAY í..., ... ~:- UCISTE.ED PUBLiC SURVEYOR 5300 EDGECIJFP lOAD FOIT WORTH. 1'EZAI t.,. - J. .' ,~; , f ..,; ~ . ~ . ..... · · · .-.... I.ON p... . ....-.. .. 'INC. . c-A · · · ~. .~ 'lOll D'..',.. ""'!t , ~'. ~, . ~. .i. -'~'~i~',,· . ~);. . ' .~. ~.,. ....~ . · ,..c~~., ~~\.:. ~ n,.', .' "--=,..':"/11:" " f, . --""y '" - I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I ORDINANCE NO. 1342 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-149 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption (change of ownership). BEING Lot 1, Block 31, College Hill Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 61, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located at the intersection of Davis Boulevard and Smithfield Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND 1986. OF JANUARY, OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-149 IS HEREBY REZONED C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption THIS 10th DAY OF February, 1986. ATTEST: MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY ~ ·1 · CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: ~bject: Planning and Development 2/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Request of Joe E. Gray to Rezone Tract 3W Aoenda Number: PZ 85-150 and 3Wl, T D Martin Survey Abstract 1055, from Ag to R-T ORDINANCE NO. 1343 This Zoning Application is presented on a tract of land located on the south side of Amundson Road west of Precinct Line Road. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. The applicant has entered into an agreement with the developer of the existing Nob Hill Subdivision which surrounds the subject tract. The intent is to add this tract to the Nob Hill Subdivision and create additional residential lots. I I RECOMMENDATION: - I I I I ~e I I I I I . The subject tract faces Amundson Road which is required to be a four lane Collector Street in the Thoroughfare Plan. The development of the property will require the participation of the applicants in the improvements to Amundson Road. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-150 requesting rezoning of Tract 3W and 3Wl, T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055 from AG to R-2. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Op ing Budget er Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director - Paae 1 of 1 R-3 ~ í/ I " I I \\ \ ' \ " I-I \', su \ ' " \ iF. P. I \ I ' , , I J I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I P I Page 4 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 ( ( Chairman Bowen called for tho wishing to speak in 0P 10n to this request to please e forward. Ther lng no one wishing to speak, e Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 85-149. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. 3. PZ 85-150 Request of Joe E. Gray to rezone Tracts 3W & 3Wl, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family). This property is located on the south side of Amundson Road, west of Precinct Line Road. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. David Barfield came forward to represent Joe Gray and Roger Hanson in both this request and request #4. He said this would be another part of Nob Hill Addition and it would have the same amenities as the present Nob Hill. Mr. Barfield said there would be approximately 140 lots. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in oPposition to this request to please Come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-150 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-150. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. 1/ . I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I (' ( KNOWL TON-E NGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 19, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills,~xas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-150 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 72 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. R~JA/ra Enclosu:"es cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager i·i,'. Gene Ri<.iúie, Director uf Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 85-150 1 Page 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I , I ORDINANCE NO. 1343 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANuARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-150 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. BEING a tract of land out of the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin set in the south R.O.W. Line of Amundson Road, said point being 1235.30 feet from the northeast corner of the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055; THENCE North 89 degrees 33 minutes 28 seconds East, a distance of 499.81 feet to a set iron pi.n for a property corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 21 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of 691.93 feet to a found iron pin for a property corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 07 minutes 05 seconds East, a distance of 270.70 feet to an iron pin for a property corner; THENCE South 88 ~egrees 52 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 289.07 feet to a found iron pin for a property corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 40 minutes 07 seconds West, a distance of 59.16 feet to a found iron pin for a property co~ner; THENCE South 89 degrees 15 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 269.47 feet to a found iron pin for a property corner; THENCE North 61 degrees 43 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 102.47 feet to a found iron pin for a property corner; THENCE North 03 degrees 38 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 449.86 feet to a found iron pin for a property corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 10 minutes 52 seconds East, a distance of 410.79 feet to a found iron pin and the point of beginning and containing 462,871 square feet or 10.626 acres of land, more or less. -......... I" Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I' I Page 2 This property is located on the south side of Amundson Road, west of Precinct Line Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. ~ç¡z-- ~¡/ .-. I ~ ~ ~ OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-150 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 10th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNL'l I" I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Request of Hanson Properties for Rezoning on Tract 3C, T. K. Martin Survey Abstract 5, ORDINANCE NO. 1344 2/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PZ 85-151 rom AG to R-2 SUbject: This Zoning Application is presented on a tract of land located on the east side of Crane Road and south of the existing Nob Hill Subdivision. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. The applicants propose to add the subject tract to the existing Nob Hill development and create additional single family lots. The applicants have submitted a proposed layout indicating their ability to comply with the R-2 criteria in the subdivision. The Staff did note the proposed layout contains two extremely long cul-de-sac streets with no outlet. However, the surrounding properties to the proposed subdivision are either partially or completely developed without provisions for accepting street extension from this tract. The applicants have no possibility for creating circulation with the exception of Crane Road which they are hesitant to utilize since it creates additional entrance points to their project. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-151 requesting rezoning on Tract 3C, T.K. Martin Survey A-I055, from AG to R-2. I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot r Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available R11/~~ City Manager , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM PaQe 1 of 1 R-3 R-3 10'0 I I I ,I , I I I \ \, \ , I-I \ , Su " " \ ' \~ \ ,FJ? , , I , I ' I ' , AG ... I' I Ie I 1 I I I I ~ I I I I 1 I I ~ I Page 5 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 ~, ( 4. PZ 85-151 Request of Hanson Properties to rezone Tract 3C, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from its present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family). This property is located on the east side of Crane Road, north of Martin Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. David Barfield came forward to represent Mr. Hanson. He stated this is another part of Nob Hill Addition. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 85-151 APPROVED Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PZ 85-151. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. 5. PZ 85-152 Chairman Bowen moved this of the agenda since no represent the request. 6. PZ 85-153 Request of Richmo ay Development to rezone Tract ,Block I, Meado~ Lakes Additio rom its present cIa ication of R-l (Single Family) Ò R-2 (Single Family). This property is located on the north side of Meadow Lakes Drive at Lariat Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. I I' I Ie I I I 'I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 19, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-151 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 80 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gen~ Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works . Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review 1 PZ 85-151 Page 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 . BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I ORDINANCE NO. 1344 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-151 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. BEING the description of a 13.8838 acre tract of land in the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, Tarrant County, Texas, said tract situated in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at the southwest corner of Block 3, Nob Hill, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-183, Page 54, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 89 degrees 48 minutes 48 seconds East along the south property line of said Block 3, a distance of 501.22 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 89 degrees 54 minutes 30 seconds East, 239.91 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 43 degrees 00 minutes 19 seconds East 426.92 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 24 minute a 28 seconds West, 315.39 feet to a point tor corner; THFN(.~. L"r.H1r·n .89 âegr.pp~ 46 minutes 13 se~onda W~st:, 1032.52 feel to a point lying in the east right-of-way of Crane Road, a 50 foot R.O.W.; THENCE North 00 degrees 13 minutes 18 seconds West, 630.48 feet to the point of beginning and containing 13.8838 acres or 604,780 square feet of land. -, I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I Page 2 This property is located on the east side of Crane Road, north of Martin Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. 7/"'? '£ ~ ;:../- ' " 4~~....t2 ~ s~ PLANNI~~~~MMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-151 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 10th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS _ ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: AT'::~~_~:~'! CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 2/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Request of Chart Development to Rezone Part of Agenda Number: PZ 85-152 Tract IAI, W.D. Barnes Survey Abstract 146, from C-1 to C-l SU ORDINANCE NO. 1345 This Zoning Application is presented on a portion of the vacant commercial tract located on the northwest corner of Starnes Road and Smithfield Road. The requested rezoning is from C-1 Commercial to C-1 SU Commercial Specific Use-Sale of Beer for Off-premises Consumption. The applicants propose to construct a convenience store on the subject tract in which they wish to be able to sell package beer. The subject tract is located on the corner of Starnes Road which is designated as a two lane Collector Street and Smithfield Road which is classified as a four lane Collector Street. When this property is developed the applicants will be required to dedicate and construct or fund their portion of these two streets. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-152 requesting rezoning on Tract IA1, W.D. Barnes Survey Abstract 146, from C-l to C-l SUe ~ ~ I I Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ¡ ~ -/ Rff/~ epart e Head ~ature ' City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director I Paae 1 of 1 ......'" ,¡ .S·~3J ,qc¡ i '·t TO R C-2 Pi VS- J.3i Atq C"2 TÞ 1(.' I I I I :3 R-2 1U8 I Ie I I I I I 1 I Ie I I I I I I I t' I Page 13 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 ( PZ 85-154 APPROVED PZ 85-155 APPROVED .5, P7 ~~-152 (" Chairman Bowen stated they lost 1~ acres and they are now asking for a additional 2 acres so they are ga- ing approximately ~ acre. Chairman Bowen closed Hearing. Mr. Wood made the mo PZ 85-154 with the the houses be 20 square foot minimum and the lots ,400 square foot minimum and ith the completion of the golf cour This motion was seconded by Ms. sh and the motion carried 5-0. stated PZ 85-155 will plan approval. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 85-155 with the stipulations of 1000 square foot minimum unit size, 16 units per acre, and with the completion of the golf course. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Schwinger voting against. Request of Richmond Bay Development for preliminary plat of Blocks 10, 11, -& 12, Mèadow Lakes Addition. Mr. Wood made the ,motion to approve PS 85-84. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. ~~quebL or ~hart üevelopment to rezone part of Tract IAl, W.D. Barnes Survey, Abstract 146, from its present classification of C-l (Commercial) to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. This property is located at the northwest corner of Smithfield Keller Road and Starnes Road. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I Page 14 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 ( PZ 85-152 APPROVED 10. ELECTION OF OFFICERS ( Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Bryan Chandler came forward to represent Chart Development. He said they are planning a "Cousins" food store. He said they have developed 150 convenience stores and have 3 in the Metroplex. He showed pictures of some of the stores. Mr. Chandler said they would sell gas and beer. He said they feel they have a more modern look and they would have some fast food. Chairman Bowen said they will have to give the name of an individual to the City Council for the Specific Use. Mr. Chandler said he knew that. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Donald Monroe, Cedar Park Drive, came forward. He said his property is at the back of this property. He named over several stores selling beer and can't see why they need another one. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hallford æade the motion to approve PZ 85-152. This· motio~ was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the wOLio~ ca£ried 5-0. Chairman Bowe c a Vice Chairman. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I #'" ( ( KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 19, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richlõnd Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-152 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-l TO C-I-SU REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 51 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zúning Commission and the City Council. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. L1ne, City Manager ..- 'r~r. Gene Kìddle, Director ot' Publ ic Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 85-152 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283.6211 . METRO/267.3367 I- I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I , ORDINANCE NO. 1345 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-152 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-l to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. ALL that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the William D. Barnes Survey, Abstract 146, Tarrant County, and being a portion of a tract as recorded in Volume 6684, Page 399, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the existing north right-of-way line of Starnes Road, and the existing west R.O.W. line of Smithfield-Keller Road, said point being the southeast corner of a tract of land conveyed to United Savings Association of Texas, and described in the deed recorded in Volume 6684, Page 399, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 89 degrees 50 minutes 00 seconds West with the north R.O.W. of Starnes Road a distance of 160.00 feet for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 160.00 feet for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 50 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 177.23 feet for corner; said corner being in the existing west R.O.W. of Smt to;! fie Id-Kel.le= Road; THENCE South 06 degrees 18 minutes 41 seconds West along the west R.O.W. of Smithfield-Keller Road a distance of 160.93 feet to the point of beginning and containing 26,966 square feet or 0.619 acres of land, more or less. I- I , I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I Page 2 This property is located at the northwest corner of Smithfield-Keller Road and Starnes Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. ~æ~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-152 IS HEREBY REZONED C-I-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION THIS 10th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development 2/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Request of Richmond Bay Development to Rezone Agenda Number: PZ 85-153 Tract D, Block I, Meadow Lakes Addition from R-l to R-2 ORDINANCE NO. 1346 This Zoning Application is presented on a vacant residential tract located on the north side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive. The requested rezoning is from R-l Single Family to R-2 Single Family. The purpose for the requested rezoning to allow the applicant to design lots for the subject tract which are compatible with the existing lots in the surrounding subdivision. The subdivision layout submitted with the rezoning request would have lots facing Meadow Lakes Drive which is classified as a two lane Collector Street. It is not advisable to provide direct driveway access from residences to a Collector Street. The Staff suggested to the Commission that the lots be restricted to rear or side-entry garages to alleviate this problem. In the discussions with the applicant the proposal was made by the applicant that he would voluntarily limit the subdivision to a minimum lot size of 10,400 feet and the residence size to a minimum of 2000 square feet in order to insure compatibility with the surrounding development. II RECOMMENDATION: ~ The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-153 ~ requesting rezoning on Tract D, Block 1, Meadow Lakes Addition from R-l to R-2 with the .. stipulations to be included that the minimum lot size be restricted to 10,4DO square j feet and the minimum residence size be limited to 2000 squa~e feet. I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget o r Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available r< 111~ I Cit Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director I Pace 1 of 1 I I I- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I fl· I 1-2 1194 LR 5 U . p¿ -, (-{.-t.. D -r'o R-ï-r'tF·PD I ... I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Page 5 P & Z ~linutes January 9, 1986 4. PZ 85-151 PZ 85-152 6. PZ 85-153 ( ( Request of Hanson Properties to rezo Tract 3C, T.K. Martin Survey, Abst ct 1055, from its present classifi tion of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (S' gle Family). This property is ocated on the east side of Crane R d, north of Martin Drive. Chairman Bowen 0 ned the Public Hearing and ca ed for those wishing to speak in avor of this request to please co forward. Davi Barfield came forward to r resent Mr. Hanson. He stated this s another part of Nob Hill Addition. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PZ 85-151. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Bowen_moved this to the end . ·of the agenda since no one was here to represent the request. Request of Richmond Bay Development to rezone Tract D, Block I, Meadow Lakes Addition, from its present classifìcatiou of R-l (Single Family) to R-2 (~1ngl~ ¡dm~LY). ln1S property is located on the north side of Meadow Lakes Drive at Lariat Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please Come forward. I .. ( Page 6 P & Z Minutes 1_ January 9, 1986 I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I , I ( Marion Massey, Attorney, came forward to represent Richmond Bay Development. He stated this land was at the entrance to Meadow Lakes and under the grandfather clause was previously Multi-Family. He said it is now R-l residential and they are requesting R-2 zoning with 10,400 square foot lots and 2000 square foot homes. Mr. Massey said this conforms to the minimum square footage of the lots and homes in Phase 2 of Meadow Lakes Addition. Chairman Bowen asked, if approved, would they have any objections to requiring rear entry garages on this collector street. Mr. Massey said they had no objections. Mr. Hallford asked if the lots would comply with the rear entry. Mr. Massey said they would. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. "John Hartley, 4917 Lariat Drive, came forward. He asked several questions. He asked if the previous Planned Development had anything other than R-l zoning. C11airman BoweIl said it diå. Mr. Hartley asked if this tract was in the original request. Chairman Bowen said it was not. Mr. Hartley asked if they plan to annex any more property into Meadow Lakes. He also asked if this violates any zoning ordinance. 1- Page 7 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 ( Ie I I I I I I I Ie PZ 85-153 APPROVED I I I I 70 PZ 85-154 I I I t' I ( Chairman Bowen stated this was not included in the Planned Development zoning. Mr. Hartley stated they need a buffer zone and he felt reducing the amount of lots would degrade the area. He said they would be zero lot line. Chairman Bowen stated these lots are comfortable to the lot sizes in Meadow Lakes. Mr. Wood stated the average lot size in Meadow Lakes is approximately 10,500 square feet. Mr. Hartley stated he still was against this request because of the traffic. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 85-153 with the stipulation that the lots be a minimum of 10,400 square feet and the houses 2000 square feet with rear entry garages. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Bowen stated that items 7 would be heard tog,ether, but individually. st of_Richmond Bay to rezone part of Tract 2, .. .:..- T;..-iIúb 1..:. S~l. '-J; ALb I...L a~ L l.J ¿ \J , from its present classification of R-6-T-PD (Townhomes) to R-2 (Single Family). This property is located \ west of Rufe Snow Drive between Meadow Lakes Drive and Riviera Drive. I I I- I I I I I ,I II I I I I I I I " I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUL TINC ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 19, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-153 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-1 TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 120 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. tt~, RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. .. R~/A/ra Enclosures tc: Mr. Rodger N. Line. City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development . Zoning Review PZ 85-153 1 Page 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267.3367 I' I {' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I ORDINANCE NO. 1346 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-153 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-l to R-2. BEING a tract of land situated in the J.M. Vandusen Survey, Abstract 1588, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being all of Tract D, Meadow Lakes Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 28, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of Fossil Creek Trails, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-87, Pages 46-47, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said tract being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod at the southeast corner of Meadow Lakes, 1st Filing, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-123, Pages 27-28, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; said point also being in the north line of Meadow Lakes Drive (an 90 foot R.O.W.); THENCE North 00 degrees 11 minutes 08 seconds West, along the east line of said Meadow Lakes 1st Filing, a distance of 168.43 feet to an iron rod for corner; TBENCE North 89 degrees 34 minutes 04 seconds East, a distance of 812.00 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 32 minutes 03 seconds East, a distance of 111.62 ==.=.:: ::J ani.~vu :"v': fv.. ':'viller in L~1t~ north R.O.W. line of said Meadow Lakes Drive; said point also being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 12 degrees 12 minutes 15 seconds, a radius of 1298.28 feet, a tangent of 138.79 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of South 83 degrees 33 minutes 49 seconds West, 276.01 feet; THENCE Southwesterly along said non-tangent curve to the right and said north R.O.W. LINE OF Meadow Lakes Drive, an arc distance of 276.54 feet to an iron rod at the end of said curve; I I , I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I f' I Page 2 THENCE South 89 degrees 36 minutes 27 seconds West, along said north R.O.W. line of Meadow Lakes Drive, a distance of 300.00 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a curve to the left having a central angle of 13 degrees 32 minutes 48 seconds, a radius of 1017.79 feet, and a tangent of 120.88 feet; THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the left and said north R.O.W. line of Meadow Lakes Drive, an arc distance of 240.64 feet to the point of beginning and containing 2.6093 acres of land. This property is located on the north side of Meadow Lakes Drive at Lariat Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. ¿;g~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~~e~ ~ .~ OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-153 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 10th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS~ CITY SECR~TARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I' · I CITY OF NORTH RICH LA NO HILLS Department: Planning and Development 2/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Request of Richmond Bay Development to Rezone Part of Tract 2, W.A. Trimble Survey Abstract 1520, from R-6-T PD to R-2 Single Family ORDINANCE NO. 1347 Agenda Number: PZ 85-154 This Zoning Application is presented on a portion of the existing Planned Development Site located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of the existing developed Meadow Lakes Subdivision. The requested rezoning is from R-6-T PD Townhome Planned development to R-2 Single Family. The purpose for the requested rezoning is to allow the applicants to develop the subject tract as a single family residential subdivision. The applicants propose to design lots which are in compliance with the R-2 criteria and also compatible with the surrounding subdivision. The applicants have offered to voluntarily restrict their minimum lot size to 10,400 square feet and their residence size to a minimum of 2000 square feet. In the previously approved Planned Development Site Plan for this area the subject tract was proposed to be developed as single family residences in a similar format to the the current proposal. The Staff noted that although the surrounding subdivision currently has an R-l designation the existing lots are more nearly compatible with the R-2 district regarding the minimum lot sizes in the existing subdivision. For the City Council's consideration the minutes covering the actions of the City Council in. approving the Planned Development Site Plan in Ordinance 1033 are included as a reference in Zoning Application PZ 85-155. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-154 requesting rezoning of part of Tract 2, W.A. Trimble Survey Abstract 1520, from R-6-T PD to R-2 with the stipulations that the minimum lot size be 10,400 square feet and the minimum residence size be 2000 square feet. In addition the Commission recommended that the requirement that the applicants either begin construction or provide guaranteed funds for the proposed Golf Course be included as a condition of permitting in this subdivision. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget o r Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available l I:' i ¡,f,,, , Finance Director __ L ~ \.. ( City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Paae 1 of 1 I' I I- I I I I I I Ie. I I I I I I .1 , I 1-2 1194 LR S U .. Pc! ~$"- (-c....T· -rø R-ï-t'¡F'PP I' I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I Page 7 p & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 ( 7c PZ 85-154 (' Chairman Bowen stated this was not included in the Planned Development zoning. Mr. Hartley stated they need zone and he felt reducing e amount of lots would degrade area. He said they would be z 0 lot line. Chairman Bowen comfortable Lakes. ated these lots are the lot sizes in Meadow od stated the average lot size - i eadow Lakès is approximately 0,500 square feet. Mr. Hartley stated he still was against this request because of the 'traffic. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 85-153 with the stipulation that the lots be a minimum of 10,400 square feet and the houses 2000 square feet with rear entry garages. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Bowen stated that items 7 & 9 would be heard together, but voted on individually. Tract 6-Request of Richmond Bay Development to rezone part of Tract 2, ~J.A. T-;:-~",1lc ::;"¡1.'v'::j, :..:.....;;..act ~.:;2G, from its present classification of R-6-T-PD (Townhomes) to R-2 (Single Family). This property is located west of Rufe Snow Drive between Meadow Lakes Drive and Riviera Drive. I Page 8 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 I Ie 9. PZ 85-155 I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I ,- I ( ( Tract 5-Request of Richmond Bay Development to rezone part of Tract 2, W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from its present classification of R-6-T-PD (Townhomes) to R-7-MF-PD (Multi-Family). This property is located west of Rufe Snow Drive between Meadow Lakes Drive and Riviera Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Marion Massey came forward to represent Richmond Bay Development. He said they were asking for #7-Tract6 from R-6-T-PD to R-2 and #9-Tract 5 R-6-T-PD to R-7-MF-PD. He said in the letters that were sent out it said townhomes, but no zoning was approved for townhomes. Mr. Massey said the zoning classification change was to the zoning map, but it should be residential-1 now. He said Tract 6 would be R-2 with the same restrictions of 10,400 square foot lots and 2000 square foot houses and this would be upgrading to R-2 from R-6-T-PD. Mr. Hallford asked if he meant the lots would be 10,500 square feet. Mr. Massey said they would be 10,400 square feet. lll~~. -;.; vu~ &6 ~t::ù .if L.ìu~ ~ .léir.: still allows the golf course. Mr. Massey said it would. He said there would be wider fairways and they would be on the north, east, and south. I Page 9 ( P & Z Minutes I January 9, 1986 Ie I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ,- I ( Mr. Massey said Tract 5, #9, was part of the Planned Development which was designated in Ordinance #1033 as condos with 1000 square feet and they do not wish that to be changed. He said when the configuration of Meadow Lakes Drive was changed, it cut off one and a half acres and they are requesting R-7-MF with the same density as the original ordinance. He said they lost 1~ acres and with the addition of the 2 acre triangle, they would add approximately ~ acre. Mr. Wood asked if he said they would leave the 1000 square foot minimum per unit with 16 units per acre. Mr. Massey said that was correct. Ms. Flippo asked does this new configuration affect the golf course. Mr. Massey said it did not. Mr. Wood said he figures it would be an additional 8 units with the same floor plan as in the Planned Development. Mr. Royston said that was correct. Mr. Schwinger said he would like to ask the same question as Councilman Ramsey did back in 1983: "Is the reason for the request for Multi Family because the homes in Meadow Lakes could not be sold". ~:-. ~~.1ssc.y ~~.:..: 1.:. u<::L.I::SSary co have some Multi-Family to have a better production and return on their investment. Chairman Bowen stated these will basically be for sale. Mr. Massey said yes, they would be as good as the existing homes and they would sell them to individual owners. He said they would be constructed with that idea in mind. . I Page 10 ( P & Z Minutes I January 9, 1986 ~ I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I ( Mr. Royston stated the site plan predates the present ordinance and the reason the R-6-T was applied was the unit size. He said the site plan is superior to any other zoning. Chairman Bowen asked for those wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. Theron D. Horton, 6505 Meadow Lakes Court, came forward. He asked if the Planned Development had eroded away. Mr. Royston said there are areas in which the zoning has changed and been taken out of the PD. Mr. Horton asked if it would be possible for the neighbors to petition the zoning. Mr. Royston stated the right of re-call is not available under State law. Mr. Horton said any change would have to come from here. Mr. Royston said that is correct. Mr. Horton stated he wanted to speak -against :this request. He said the homeowners do not want apartments in their neighborhood. He said he was here at all the meetings and they agreed to some zero lot line homes and Some patio homes. Mr. Horton said they had a homeowners meeting with Mr. ::u~~_Y' He s&id thld is an Imporcant question. He said they need to believe in the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council and believe they would carry out their wishes. Chairman Bowen said that under the PD, they had 16 units per acre, so they are not increasing the density. I Pa~e 11 ( P & Z Minutes I January 9, 1986 Ie I I I I I I Ie I ,I I I I I I f' I ( Bill Fenimore, Riviera Drive, came forward. He said tell us why the R-6-T. Mr. Royston said the previous ordinance was a Planned Development. He said this R-6-T came with the adoption of the ordinance in January, 1984. Mr. Fenimore asked what is the need for the change. Mr. Massey they are wanting to change the designation to conform with the present R-7-MF and add an additional two acres. Chairman Bowen stated the new zoning ordinance came in after the PD was approved and they just wish to conform with the new terms. Mr. Fenimore said he knew they had different categories. Chairman Bowen stated they will have to come back to the Commission for site plan approval before they can build. "Mr. Wood said the only difference is the addition of the two acres. He said there would be an addition of 8 units with the same size and the type arid quality would remain the same. Mr. Fenimore askeå if they had always Uè:lU Lne l-iguL co build apartments. Mr. Wood said yes that was correct. Mr. Royston said that was true. Mr. Fenimore said it would be hard to build apartments with 1000 square feet. I Page 12 ( p & Z Minutes I January 9, 1986 Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( Mr. Fenimore said he was not questioning their quality, they have done a good job in all they have done. Larry Smith, 5005 Skylark, came forward. He asked under the existing townhouse zoning, would it require garages. Mr. Royston stated that on page 64 of the zoning ordinance, it requires one covered parking and one uncovered. Mr. Smith asked if there had been any study of the traffic on Meadow Lakes. Mr. Royston said in the recent bond issue, Rufe Snow Drive will be widened to 5 lanes and when Meadow Lakes is opened, the bridge will definitely be more than a two lane. Bobby Lambert, 4912 Lariat, came forward. He asked if there are 32 acres in this request. Mr. Wood said no, that Meadow Lakes Drive did curve differently. He showed Mr. Lambert the layout. "Mr. Massey said they had previously asked for patio homes, but it was denied. He said they previously had 54 acres of apartment land that they sold to the church. Mr. Massey said they will do what they say they will do. Chairman Bowen said he wanted to be sure everyone had had their questions answered. Gale Napier asked what they were losing. I I Ie Page 13 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 ( I I I PZ 85-154 APPROVED I I I Ie I I PZ 85-155 APPROVED - 8. PS 85-84 I PS 85-84 APPROVED I I I I ,- I 5. PZ 85-152 - ( Chairman Bowen stated they lost 1~ acres and they are now asking for an additional 2 acres so they are gaining approximately ~ acre. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-154 with the stipulation that the houses be 2000 square foot minimum and the lots 10,400 square foot minimum and with the completion of the golf course. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Bowen stated PZ 85-155 will require a site plan approval. Ms. Nash ~de the motion to approve PZ 85-155 with the stipulations of 1000 square foot minimum unit size, 16 units per acre, and with the completion of the golf course. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Schwinger voting against. Request of Richmond Bay Development for preliminary plat of Blocks 1 , 11, .& 12, Méadow Lakes Addition Mr. Wood made the. 10n to approve PS 85-84. Thi otion was seconded by Mr. Schwi and the motion carried 5-0. ~~ ~ Request or Lhart uevelopment to rezone part of Tract lAl, W.D. Barnes Survey, Abstract 146, from its present classification of C-l (Commercial) to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. This property is located at the northwest corner of Smithfield Keller Road and Starnes Road. I' I -- I I I I I I Ie· I I I I I I I f' I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 19, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. "Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-154 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-6-T-PD TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 128 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. R~/A/ra Enclosures c.c:, r~r.. Rodger N. Line, City Manaaer Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 85-154 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267.3367 I I Ie I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I t' I ORDINANCE NO.I347 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-154 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-6-T-PD to R-2. Tract 6 BEING a tract of land situated in the W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod at the northwest corner of Lot 41, Block 3, Meadow Lakes First Filing, as recorded in Volume 388-124, Page 27, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 32 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East, along the west line of said Meadow Lakes First Filing, a distance of 44.42 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of 87 degrees 51 minutes 47 seconds, a radius of 200.00 feet, and a tangent length of 192.68 feet; THENCE southwesterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 306.70 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE South 55 degrees 04 minutes 24 seconds West, a distance of 109.66 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 34 degrees 55 minutes 36 seconds East> a distance of 69.48 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 08 degrees 50 minutes 03 seconds West, a distance feet to a point for corner; . ¡ .98 THENCE South 36 degrees 15 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 334.16 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 27 degrees 57 minutes 08 seconds West, a distance of 47.65 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 70 degrees 06 minutes 07 seconds West, a distance of 164.33 feet to a point for corner; I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t- I Page 2 THENCE North 82 degrees 44 minutes 19 seconds West, a distance of 171.82 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 47 degrees 04 minutes 25 seconds West, a distance of 46.06 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 23 degrees 52 minutes 58 seconds West, a distance of 216.74 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 82 degrees 37 minutes 47 seconds West, a distance of 555.34 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 81 degrees 47 minutes 10 seconds West, a distance of 251.94 feet to a point for corner at the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 28 degrees 30 minutes 13 seconds, a radius of 924.96 feet, a tangent length of 234.94 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of North 06 degrees 02 minutes 17 seconds West, 455.42 feet; THENCE northwesterly along said non-tangent curve to the left, an arc distance of 460.15 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE North 69 degrees 42 minutes 37 seconds East, a distance of 160.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 20 degrees 17 minutes 23 seconds West, a distance of 151.03 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of 03 degrees 53 minutes 09 seconds, a radius of 284.78 feet and a tangent length of 9.66 feet; THENCE northwesterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 19.31 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE South 62 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 510.75 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 79 degrees 48 minutes 09 seconðs East, a distance of 557.19 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 55 degrees 04 minut~s 24 seconds East, a distance of 110.56 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the lef· having a central ang~e or ð' degrees ~l m1nutes 4/ seconds, a raá1US -- l~U.UO feet and a tangent length of 144.51 feet; THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 230.02 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE North 32 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds West, a distance of 46.31 feet to a point on the southerly R.O.W. line of Meadow Lakes Drive (an 80-foot R.O.W.) and the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 02 degrees 47 minutes 28 seconds, a radius of 1027.27 feet, a tangent length of 25.03 feet, and a chord bearing a distance of North 59 degrees 22 minutes 28 seconds East, 50.04 feet; " \. .. I I Ie I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I t' I Page 3 THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the left and along said sougherly R.O.W. line of Meadow Lakes Drive, an arc distance of 50.04 feet to the point of beginning and containing 15.2163 acres of land. This property is located west of Rufe Snow Drive between Meadow Lakes Drive and Riviera Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. ZONING COMMISSION ~~Po ' ~;~ PLANN;;;'ì'~~~~O~SSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-154 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 10th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY 1.'- I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development 2/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Request of Richmond Bay Development to Rezone Part of Tract 2, W.A. Trimble Survey Abstract 1520 from R-6-T PD to R-7-MF PD ORDINANCE NO. 1348 Agenda Number: PZ 85-155 , ~ II The Staff had noted that a comprehensive list of stipulations were included in the I ear~ier approval. However, in the interim since that approval many changes have been granted in the zoning of the various portions of the property belonging to the ~apPlicants. It is Staff's opinion that consideration of this application and the application PZ 85-154 will effectively void the original Site Plan Approval and remove the stipulations contained therein. A review of those stipulation reveals that the only one of the items still having relevance to the development of this property is the construction of the Golf Course. The Staff noted to the Commission that there are ongoing negotiations between the City and the applicants to secure a contract that would allow the City to build and operate the proposed golf course. This Zoning Application is presented on a portion of the Planned Development Site located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive and west of the existing Meadow Lakes Subdivision. The requested rezoning is from R-6-T PD Townhome Planned Development to R-7 MF PD Multi-Family Planned Development. The applicants purpose in requesting the zoning revision is to allow for the development of the Site in a similar project to that which was previously approved on the Planned Development Site Plan. The current request also adds approximately 2.0 acres of property to the previously approved tract. The change of the zoning designation to multi-family will allow the applicant to continue his development at the same density which was previously approved. This current request is basically a restatement of the earlier development proposal for the subject tract with the addition of the 2.0 acres along the western portion of the tract. The additional acreage would come from the property obligated to the construction of the golf course. The Staff has verified that the reduction in property will not affect the development of the proposed golf course in this area. I I I I I I Source of Funds: ~ Bonds (GO/Rev.) J..~gier~ting 8~Udget _ ~ /} '-1 ~ ~~ fl1L~ I . Depar ent Head Signature city Manager I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM The Staff also noted to the Commission. that the rezoning request was for the district change only. Should the rezoning be approved the applicants would be required to submit for consideration a formal site plan in compliance with the PD criteria for the Commission's and City Council's approval. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 85-155 requesting a portion of Tract 2, W.A. Trimble Survey Abstract 1520 be rezoned from R-6-T PD to R-7 MF PD with the stipulations that the requirement for the applicant to construct or fund the golf course as a condition of permitting be retained and that consideration be given to limiting the unit size minimum on the PD Site Plan to 1000 square feet per unit. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Paae 1 of __!__ Ie I I I I I I· I I I I I I I P¿ ßS'''' (-(.,·T· -rø R-1-MS;-PP I 1-2 1194 R-7-MF C-2 A' . I' H, I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I Page 7 p & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 ( 7. PZ 85-154 ( Chairman Bowen stated this was not included in the Planned Developm zoning. Mr. Hartley stated they n d a buffer zone and he felt reduc g the amount of lots would degra the area. He said they would b zero lot line. Chairman Bow stated these lots are comfortab to the lot sizes in Meadow Lakes. Wood stated the average lot size n Meadow Lakes is approximately 10,500 square feet. Mr. Hartley stated he still was against this request because of the traffic. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 85-153 with the stipulation that the lots be a minimum of 10,400 square feet and the houses 2000 square feet with rear entry garages. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Bowen stated that items 7 & 9 would be heard together, but voted on individually. Tract: 6-Requ0E¡t ùf Richmond Bay Development to rezone part of Tract 2, W.A. ~rimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from its present classification of R-6-T-PD (Townhomes) to R-2 (Single Family). This property is located west of Rufe Snow Drive between Meadow Lakes Drive and Riviera Drive. #- I- ~- I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I Page 8 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 9. PZ 85-155 ( ( Tract 5-Request of Richmond Bay Development to rezone part of Tract 2, W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from its present classification of R-6-T-PD (Townhomes) to R-7-MF-PD (Multi-Family). This property is located west of Rufe Snow Drive between Meadow Lakes Drive and Riviera Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Marion Massey came forward to represent Richmond Bay Development. He said they were asking for #7-Tract6 from R-6-T-PD to R-2 and #9-Tract 5 R-6-T-PD to R-7-MF-PD. He said in the letters that were sent out it said townhomes, but no zoning was approved for townhomes. Mr. Massey said the zoning classification change was to the zoning map, but it should be residential-I now. He said Tract 6 would be R-2 with the same restrictions of 10,400 square foot lots and 2000 square foot houses and this would be upgrading to R-2 from R-6-T-PD. Mr. Hallford asked if he meant the lots w011ld be 10,500 square feet. Mr. Massey said they would be 10,400 square feet. Mr. Wood aSKed 1f the plat st1il allows the golf course. Mr. Massey said it would. He said there would be wider fairways and they would be on the north, east, and south. .~ I I (I I I I I I I I -- I 'I I I I I I f' I Page 9 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 ( ( Mr. Massey said Tract 5, #9, was part of the Planned Development which was designated in Ordinance #1033 as condos with 1000 square feet and they do not wish that to be changed. He said when the configuration of Meadow Lakes Drive was changed, it cut off one and a half acres and they are requesting R-7-MF with the same density as the original ordinance. He said they lost 1~ acres and with the addition of the 2 acre triangle, they would add approximately ~ acre. Mr. Wood asked if he said they would leave the 1000 square foot minimum per unit with 16 units per acre. Mr. Massey said that was correct. Ms. Flippo asked does this new configuration affect the golf course. Mr. Massey said it did not. Mr. Wood said he figures it would be an additional 8 units with the same floor plan as in the Planned Development. Mr. Royston said that was correct. Mr. Schwinger said he would like to ask the same question as Councilman Ramsey did back in 1983; "Is the reason for the request for Multi Family because the homes in Meadow Lakes cot.:ld not be sold". Mr. Massey said it is necessary to have some Multi-Family to have a better production and return on their investment. Chairman Bowen stated these will basically be for sale. Mr. Massey said yes, they would be as good as the existing homes and they would sell them to individual owners. He said they would be constructed with that idea in mind. 1- Page 10 ( P & Z Minutes I January 9, 1986 f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I ( Mr. Royston stated the site plan predates the present ordinance and the reason the R-6-T was applied was the unit size. He said the site plan is superior to any other zoning. Chairman Bowen asked for those wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. Theron D. Horton, 6505 Meadow Lakes Court, came forward. He asked if the Planned Development had eroded away. Mr. Royston said there are areas in which the zoning has changed and been taken out of the PD. Mr. Horton asked if it would be possible for the neighbors to petition the zoning. Mr. Royston stated the right of re-call is not available under State law. Mr. Horton said any change would have to come from here. Mr. Royston said that is correct. Mr. Horton stated he wanted to speak against this request. He said the homeowners do not want apartments in their neighborhoo~. He said he was here at all the meetings and they agreed to some zero lot line homes and some patio homes. Mr. Horton s~id they had a homeowners meeting with Mr. Massey. He said this is an important question. He said they need to believe in the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council and believe they would carry out their wishes. Chairman Bowen said that under the PD, they had 16 units per acre, so they are not increasing the density. I'" Page 11 ( P & Z Minutes I January 9, 1986 ~ I I I I I I I --- I I I I I I I t' I ( Bill Fenimore, Riviera Drive, came forward. He said tell us why the R-6-T. Mr. Royston said the previous ordinance was a Planned Development. He said this R-6-T came with the adoption of the ordinance in January, 1984. Mr. Fenimore asked what is the need for the change. Mr. Massey they are wanting to change the designation to conform with the present R-7-MF and add an additional two acres. Chairman Bowen stated the new zoning ordinance came in after the PD was approved and they just wish to conform with the new terms. Mr. Fenimore said he knew they had different categories. Chairman Bowen stated they will have to come back to the Commission for site plan approval before they can build. Mr. Wood said the only difference is the addition of the two acres. He said there would be an addition of 8 ~nits with the same size and the type and quality would remain the same. Mr. Fenimore asked if th~v had alwRvR had the right to build apartments. Mr. Wood said yes that was correct. Mr. Royston said that was true. Mr. Fenimore said it would be hard to build apartments with 1000 square feet. 1- Page 12 ( P & Z Minutes I January 9, 1986 - I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I ( Mr. Fenimore said he was not questioning their quality, they have done a good job in all they have done. Larry Smith, 5005 Skylark, came forward. He asked under the existing townhouse zoning, would it require garages. Mr. Royston stated that on page 64 of the zoning ordinance, it requires one covered parking and one uncovered. Mr. Smith asked if there had been any study of the traffic on Meadow Lakes. Mr. Royston said in the recent bond issue, Rufe Snow Drive will be widened to 5 lanes and when Meadow Lakes is opened, the bridge will definitely be more than a two lane. Bobby Lambert, 4912 Lariat, came forward. He asked if there are 32 acres in this request. Mr. Wood said no, that Meadow Lakes Drive did curve differently. He showed Mr. Lambert the layout. Mr. Massey said they had previously asked for patio homes, but it was denied. He said they previously had 54 acres of apartment land that they sold to the church. Mr. Massey said they will do what they say they will do. Chairman Bowen said he wanted to be sure everyone had had their questions answered. Gale Napier asked what they were losing. I' ' · w. I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I Page 13 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 ( PZ 85-154 APPROVED PZ 85-155 APPROVED 8. PS 85-84 PS 85-84 APPROVED ~. ~z ~~-lj2 ( Chairman Bowen stated they lost l~ acres and they are now asking for an additional 2 acres so they are gaining approximately ~ acre. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 85-154 with the stipulation that the houses be 2000 square foot minimum and the lots 10,400 square foot minimum and with the completion of the golf course. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Bowen stated PZ 85-155 will require a site plan approval. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 85-155 with the stipulations of 1000 square foot minimum unit size, 16 units per acre, and with the completion of the golf course. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Schwinger voting against. Request of Richmond Bay Development for preliminary plat of Blocks 10 '& 12, Meadow Lakes Addition. Mr. Wood made the mo · n to approve PS 85-84. This tion was seconded by Mr. Schwin and the motion carried 5-0. Request ot Chart Development to rezone part of Tract IAl, W.D. Barnes Survey, Abstract 146, from its present classification of C-l (Commercial) to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. This property is located at the northwest corner of Smithfield Keller Road and Starnes Road. I' ~ . ~. I I I I I I I -. I I I I I I I tt I MINUTES OF PREVIOUS ZONING OF MEADOW LAKES I'~i ~ I *10. I ;'1 I I ·1 I Ii I I I I I I I ~ I _.....I.~ - -.w.IIoI......... (~ J: ." ':11~ .1111 ..."1..~~ to _,.. "':'1 ~ ....._ 1-.1.... i...l - (' . .;.Ã~ . ~ ~~ ~~ ~ . ~y,;.:.¢~'f;;.-þ ~_. .,J.~~tþ# .".~ .~~. .,.~~~, ,. ~ 'r'- -I ,·ß-·...:... -. -.. .~ -&.~....... Amended motion died for the lack of a second. Original motion carried 7-0. , ._~ '-.... ~ . -- .... '~. ..I"""..'(.........w¡... '~ ...1·····". ...- . ·.....-...'f·· ~". 11. Mayor Faram opened the public hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of the request to please come forward. Mr. Marion Massey, 2701 Airport Freeway, representing W. Brown appeared before the Council. Mr. Massey stated they had worked diligently to work out a suitable plan with Haltom City and North Richland Hills. Mr. Massey stated that Haltom City had approved the request with no opposition. Mr. Massey stated that there had been meetings with the citizens. in North Richland Hills who had . objections to the request and most had been neutralized. Mr. Massey stated they did have 48 signatures Qf residents within 200 f~et that were for the project, 50 signatures of residents not wìthin 200 feet and signatures of three that had asked to be removed from the petition in opposition to the request. Mr. Massey stated this project came to light becàuse two investors w~nted to build a golf course in the flood plain. Mr. Massey stated they planned to build the golf course, repair thè dams on the lakes, to pay for a u-turn bridge at the intersection of Loop 820 and Rufe Snow Drive. Mr. Massey stated they planned to build multi-family in Phase'! and II, between Loop 820 and TESCO right-of-way, bordered on the west by the railroad track and bili~d condominiums on Phase II. Mr. Massey showed the Council a lay-out of the proposed development. Mr. Massey stated that Phase I and II were zoned Local Retail in 1974. The present developer purchased it in 1976 and at that time did rely on the fact that it was Local Retail and at that time multi-family could be located in Local Retail zoning. Mr. Massey stated that Phase III was zoned multi-family in 1974, but since that time it had been zoned back to single family. Mr. Massey stated they had done a traffic study on Phase III by using a formula and traffic generated by a shopping center which, under the present zoning, would create three times more traffic than mülti-family. , .. - I..:J - ó ..::S Page 5 PLANNING & ZONING - PS 83-49, REQUEST C ALAN W. HAMM FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 8R, AND lOR, LONGSDALE ADDITION (LOCATED C THE EAST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AT HARWOOD ROAD) ~~ 'V PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC HEARING PZ 83-25, REQUEST C W. BROWN, CUSTOM BUILDERS INCORPORAI TO REZONE TRACTS 0: LAND IN W.A. TRIMEl SURVEY ABSTRACT 152 R.P. BURTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 175, AND ¡'. AKERS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 19, FROM PLA1WED DEVELOPMENT AGRICULTURE AND LOC REUIL TO MULTI- F AM-IL Y , PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIFIC USE - GOLF COURSE (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NORTHEAST LOOP 820 AND BOU1~ED ON THE EAST BY MEADOW LAKI ADDITION &~ ON THE SOUTH BY .20S511· CRE TRAILS ADDITION) I- , . ........ I-- I- I I I I -I I -. I I _. ......,.....,.--- ..-- I I I I I" ft I " ~ . (', ( Mr. ~~ssey stated the developer had made the following commitments to the homeowners: HI. Build the golf course ,and assure that it would be done by putting up a performance bond. . #2. Pay for a turn-around, bridge at the intersection of Loop 820 and Rufe Snow Drive. #3. Confina the multi-family to the west side of Colonial Parkway, north of the TESCO right- of-way. #4. Repair the dam on the lake. Mr. Massey stated the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the plan subject to two additional commitments. Mr. Massey stated they agreed to comply with the exception of five acres next to ~he lake being provided and paying 'for the construction of an access road on the south side of Loop 820. Mr. Massey stated the developer agreed to construct a six foot masonry fence on the north line of the TESCO right-of-way to shield the single family residents from the multi-family and limit the first row of multi-family units to one story. Mr. Massey stated that Phase III would be single family and condominiums on the west side of Colonial Parkway. Mr. Massey stated they had agreed that until such time the dam would be repaired and the developer escrowed money with t:he City for the turn-a-round bridge no permits would be issued. Mr.. Massey stated they had put together a workable plan. Councilman Hubbard asked if permission had been obtained from- the Texas Water Board to make improvements to the lakes. Mr. Massey stated,yes. Councilman Htlbbard stated thatwi.thre.géJrds to the bridge, he had a meeting with officials from the Highway Department and they had advised him that it would take a contract with the City to construct it and it would be approximately sev~ years before th~ bridge could be built. Mr. Massey stated seven years was six times the time frame given them. Councilman Hubbard stated the Highway Department also advised him the bridge would cost in excess of one million dollars. Councilman Kenna asked it both dams would be repaired. Mr. Massey replied yes. Councilman Fisher asked if Haltom City has approved the plan. i.L-' - I --.:..;, - ~ ~ Page 6 ~~ { ~. (". "'.:..... ( I· . . f'~ -: :'.:. - , '. Ie I I I I I I~ C1.- ~~".~"-:~ . .. ... 18 I I I I I I .- I , 1 (. ( Mr. Massey replied yes. Councilman Fisher stated that the plat showed aCCess from ..Colonial Parkway down to the club house. Mr. Massey stated that was a private street that they had consented to build. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he could not understand why someone would take a nice area like Meadow Lakes and build apartments on it. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked if it was because the homes in Meadow Lakes could not be sold. Mr. Massey stated the apartments were an economic factor. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked Mr. Massey if he was familiar with deed restrictions. Mr. Mass~y stated yes. -~. .--.-..-- Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he realized that deed restrictions were a civil matter, but the deed restrictions in Meadow Lakes stated the homeowners owned the lake. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that whatever the developer said he was going to do was strictly a moral obligation and he did not feel the improve- ments to the lake could legally be a part of the zoning. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he felt the lakes were a civil matter so why was so much money being spent on all the amenities just to be able to build multi-famil~. - Mr. Massey stated it was obvious that single family homes were not going to develop in Phase I and II. Mayor Pro·Tem Ramsey stated there were a number of acres in the area already zoned for apårtments and he felt the City was going to get apartment poor over night. Councilwoman Hinkle asked how large the condominiums would be.. Mr. Bob Worrell, General Manager of Cus~om Builders, stated they had p~6pose¿ 1,100 square f2¿l and deed restrictions if sold. Mayor Faram stated that discussion had taken place on Closing off Colonial Parkway at TESCO right-of-way and Meadow Lakes Drive so traffic could only turn south. Also, there would be another opening easterly to the access road and use the access road as the entrance to the apartment complex. Mr. Massey stated they had investigated that possibility and it would greatly affect the fire insurance rating. Hayor Faram stated he was concerned with putting all that traffic in the neighborhood. Councilman Newman ašked what the time element was on building the bridge. 1, Page 7 i I I" I~- I- I I I I -I I -. I I I I I I I· " 1- ., . (- ( Mr. Massey stated that it was indicated by Mr. Stone of the Highway Department that it would take eight months to let a -- -_. contrac t. Councilman Davis asked that if the access road was not ~uilt from Colonial Park~ay to Rufe Snow, if someone ~anted to go to the west, they would have to enter on to Loop 820 and exit right back off. Mr. Massey stated that was correct. ~ouncilman Davis asked Mr. Massey if he thought the Highway Department would build the access road. Mr. Massey stated yes, if the traffic warranted it. Councilman Davis asked ~ho ~ould own the lakes and maintain them. Mr. Massey stated the developer owned the lakes. .. ~..~... Councilman Davis asked Mr. Massey if he ~ould havß a problem with putting a time schedule on ~ccupancy permits until the bridge was completed. Mr. Massey stated that if it took seven years to build the . bridge the apartments would never be built. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he had paid $9.00 fbr a copy of deed restrictions that were no good. Mr. Massey stated that if the homeowners agreed to the deed restrictions they were good. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he ~anted to point out that the deed restrictions concerning the lakes was s civ~l matter. Councilman Fisher stated he was concerned about th& traffic that would b>e pUt:~.'l1 lvie~:idow ,Lakes Drj.ve and asked about the possibility of making a one-~ay from Meadow Lakes to the north side of TESCO which would allow traffic to go out of Meadow Lakes to Loop 820. Mr. Massey stated they would have no problem with that. Council~oman Hinkle asked if it ~as correct that the City would issue no permits until the money was escrowed for the bridge. Mr. Massey stated that was correct. I Page 8 "-. f \ / f ,-. ~ ':..:: .> I- I '.. . ~ I I I I I -I I I"~ -- I I I I I I I fI I ( ( Councilman Davis asked that if making Colonial from ~eadow Lakes to the TESCO right-of-way a one way north bound would, if fulfilled~ meet the requirement for fire protection. Mr. Massey stated yes. Mr. Bill F~nimore, 6041 Riveria, appeared before the Council. Mr. Fenimore stated he was a developer in the City also and he was very much-in favor of the request. Mr. Fenimore stated he felt this plan would be much better than a shopping center and be an asset to the City. Mr. David Reasor, 6545 Lakeside, appeared before the Council. Mr. Reasor stated he felt the proposal would keep the sub- division growing. Mr. Reasor stated he was attracted to the area because of the lakes and felt they made the area unique. Mayor Faram advised that the lakes were not a part of the zoning issue, the City could not require the developer to fix the lakes.Mr. Reasor stated he would like to see the Council make the developer escrow the money to fix the lakes. Mayor Faram stated he did not think the Council could require that. Mr. Reasor stated he felt the golf course would enhance the area and the proposal would also increase the ~ax base. Mr. Reasor stated he appreciated the changes the d~velopers had made for the homeoWners. ' Mr. E. F. Crites, III, 6050 Circleview, appeared before the Council. . Mr. Crites stated he had signed a petition in opposition to the request, however he was for it with the following stipula- tions: 1. The apartments pad a minimum of 1) 100 squ~are feet. 2. Condominiums be 1,600 square feet. 3. Five acre park be delegated. 4. Both dams be repaired and the walls be a minimum of 25 year life or,to State specifications. 5. Bridge at Loop 820 be constructed before any building permits were issued. Mr. Tim Hogan, 6401 Riveria, åppeared before the Council. - .....-Þ Page 9 1-- ~- I I I I I I I -. I I I I I I I " I ,J ( ( Mr. Hogan stated he felt this was a very well and. effective plan. Mr. Hogan stated the homes in Meadow Lakes, had not --retained their market value bec~use the lakes and development was not completed. Mr. Hogan stated he felt the present developer had made for provisions to handle the traffic and that it would be a good development. Mr. John Mayberry, 6405 Riveria, appeared before the Council. Mr. Mayberry stated he was one of the first to.move into Meadow Lakes. Mr. Mayberry stated he knew the cost of building and felt this proposal would be the best deal for the neighborhood and the City. Mr. Mayberry stated he was President of Meadow Lakes Association, which was not the association referred to in the deed restrictions. Mr. Mayberry stated the Meadow Lakes Association had a meeting and 24 members unanimously voted to approve this plan. Mr. Willie Wilson, 4813 Woodcreek, appeared before the Council. Mr. Wilson stated he felt it was a fine proposal and would enhance the neighborhood. Mr. Wilson stated he wàs very much in favor of the proposal. Mr. T. D. Harton, 3805 Diamond Loch East, appeared before the . Council. Mr. Harton stated he felt this was a good proposal and was the best plan for the property. Mayor Faram called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to the request to please come forward. Mr. Bobby Heath, 6104 Riveria, appeared before the Council. Mr. Heath stated he was a property owner within two hundred feet of the property,that the development as it stood. with , the density that :was proposed, would lead quickly to a 10% increase in population in North Richland Hills. Mr. Heath stated an increase in population would lead to increased traffic at Rufe Snow and Loop 820, which is already a congested intersection. Mr. Heath stated he would like to suggest an alternative development south of the TESCO right-oi-way where so many condominiums were to be built to put single family dwellings. Mr. Heath stated he was very much opposed to the request. Mr. John Nash, 5000 Lakeview Circle, appeared before the Council. Mr. Nash stated that when he purchased his home he asked for a copy of the deed restrictions. Mr. Nash stated the deed restrictions helped ~n the decision to purchase the home because the developer and any subsequent developer would have to develop single family residences until 1999. Page 10 I"' ~<-- .- I I I I I .1 I Ii I I I I I I I' ,. I (- ( Councilman Davi~ advised Mr. Nash the City could not lnforce deed restrictions. Mr. Nash stated he understood the City could not enforce the restrictions. Mr. John Harveston, 4821 Lake Side Circle, appeared before the Council. Mr. Harveston stated he was not for or against the request, he wondered if the proposal would fit into the area. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that it would. Mr. Albert McDaniel IV, 6409 Meadow Lakes, appeared before the Council. Mr. McDaniel stated he thought the Council would consider the request as the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended. Mr. McDaniel stated he felt the golf course was a gimmick. He thought the property next to the lake would be stipulated as a park and felt that there should be a park around, the lake. Mr. Dave Freeman, 6549 Spring River Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Freeman stated the dev~loper had done a fantastic job in . presenting the proposal and made many concessions. Mr. Freeman stated he felt there were many present who thought the City was going to guarantee the concessions and "he would like for someone to make the guarantee. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Freeman that if the previous developer had at one time promised a lot around the lake for access and for some reason sold the lot. Mr. Freeman stated that was correct. Mayor Faram asked Mr a Fre2rnan if he knew whether the previous devel'oper 11ad promised to fix the lakes. Mr. Freeman replied this promise had been made. Mayor Faram asked Mr. Freeman if he knew why the lakes had been drained. Mr. Freeman stated the lakes were drained because they were condemned by the State. Mr. Freeman asked what assurance could be given the people that the bridge would be built. Mr. McEntire stated that no permits would be issued until the money was escrowed for the bridge. (ø ~/...j - ó~ Pagè 11 I' I I I I I I Ia I 12. I I I I I I· t' I- I C' ( Mr. Freeman asked if there vas any kind of guarantee the lakes would be fixed. --Mr. McEntire stated no. Mr. Massey stated they planned to put up a bond and cash escrow for the lakes. Councilman Hubbard advised Mr. Freeman that in answer to his question concerning the bridge, he had been advised by the Highway Department tha't there was a chance a crossing over the highway would not be granted and an outside chance they would never approve it. Mr. Freeman asked Councilman Hubbard if he was saying there was a chance the State would not· grant it. Councilman Hubbard replied yes. Councilman Davis asked if a time schedule could be placed on the plan and if the schedule was not met the plan voided. Mr. McEntire stated yes. Mr. John Mayberry stated that in refer~nce to the lot that the previous developer had offered, the homeowners told him thanks but no thanks because they did not want the responsibility of . keeping clean. There being no one else vishing to speak, Mayor-Faram closed the public hearing .0. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he wanted clarification on the petition.' Mayor Pro Tem Rams~y stated he found out at 3:00 p.m. today that there was not a legal petition. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he was adviced that the petition vas void because there was not enough signatures of property ovmers of 20% of the effected area. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey asked when the procedure of verifying petitic,¡.s changed. in the past the m~il out- list was used and Hot r>.\~ -?f£ected area. Mr. McEntire stated there was not enough signatures either by using the mail out list or the affected area. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated that according to the ordinance he had, it did not meet the requirements of planned development. Mr. McEntire stated that if the request was approved the Council would have to instruct him to draft a specific ordinance. Mr. McEntire stated it was in compliance. Page 12 I -- o _ ',- - CONSIDERATION OF ORD INANCE FOR PZ 83-,,25 ORDINANCE NO. 1033 APPROVED I" . .- ,- "t- -- -- I I I I I I I íi I I II I I I I it I (' ( Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to deny PZ 83-25. Councilman Davis asked Mr. McEntire that if this request was approved, with stipulations could he draft an ordinance covering the stipulations and make it binding. Mr. McEntire replied yes. Councilman Fishe~ asked at what point and time stipulations could be added or removed. Mayor Faram stated that would go into the motion should this motion fail and a new motion made. Motion failed by a vote of 5-2; Councilmen Kenna, Fisher, Newman, Davis and Councilwoman Hinkle voting against; Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey an Councilman Hubbard voting for. Councilman Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve PZ 83-25 with the following stipulations and an ordinance be drawn up by the City Attorney conta~ning the stipulations. - #1. Escrow money with the City for the estimated cost of the left turn bridge and any other co~t above and beyond the estimated cost. Also the bridge would have to be accepted by the State of Texas and they would issue the contract before any permits could be issued on the multi-family north of TESCO. #2. The condominiums in Phase III be 1,000 square feet minimum. #3. Performance bond to be furnished to the City for construction of the golf course. A performance bond for the completion of the lakes forwarded to the City before any building permits for any tract would be issued. Also the ordinance would state the City would not~aintairt the lakes. #4. A six foot masonry wall to be built on the north line of the TESCO line abutting the apartments on the south side. Also within 150 feet north of TESCO the apartments to be one story only. #5. Colonial Parkway to be one-way north from TESCO right-af-way to Meadow Lakes Drive #6. Site plans would be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council on all tracts before development could begin. (p - 1-:;) - U d Page 13 I'~ 1-,,- . I I I I I (~ ( Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated the motion contained many good things, but did not think the Council should approve it as a package. Councilman Davis' stated he felt that all of the things in the motion would have to be done to be an asset to the City. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he c~uld not see them having to go back to the Planning and Zoning Commission every time, they either had a planned development or did 'not and they could go to the Staff to work it out. Mayor Faram asked if Councilman Davis meant they would have to go back th~u Planning and Zoning each time. Councilman Davis stated no, for instance on tract one, a site plan would have to be submitted and reviewed by City Staff, Planning and Zoning Commission, City Engineer and Council. Councilman Davis stated it was really a platting matter. I Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey stated he would like to strike them having to go back to Planning and Zoning. ,. ....... ~ -- .... - I Councilman Davis stated he should have used the 'Word plat instead of site plan. II I I I I I I I' ft I Mayor Faram asked if it would satisfy everyone if Planning and . Zoning Commission was deleted. Councilman Davis agreed and Councilman Kenna agreed. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard to amend the motion to state "turn Meadow Lakes Drive into a cul- de-sac just before it got to Çolonial Parkway". After further discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey withdrew his motion. Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Hubbard, to amend the motion to state "make a cul-de-sac on Colonial Parkway north to TESCO right-ai-way". Motion failed by a vote of 5-2; Councilmen Kenna, Davis, Fisher, Newman and Councilwoman Hinkle voting against; Mayor Pro Tern Ramsey and Councilman Hubbard voting for. Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Davis, to amend item 114 of the motion to state "the first group of buildings north of TESCO next to the wall be single story".' Motion carried 6-1; Councilmen Kenna, Davis, Hubbard, Fisher and Newman and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for; Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey voting against. - ---_.---~-_.- Page 14 1,'- ',.. ~. ,. ,,- '. - . -- I *13. I I I I -I I II I I I 'I I I I fJ I (- ( Page 15 Original motion as amended carried by a vote of 5-2; · Councilmen Kenna, Davis, Fisher and NeYman and Council~oman Hinkle voting for; Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey and Councilman Hubbard --voting against~' ,... liT ~'~~~~~,.J"I"L~~~~; I'W'~"'i ~tf\~I-~"~~~....n~~'",""""'#I'4f~n'''''1I~f'''''~IM;'/rn~~II"IY"""W"~~>AI'Ø~'4!'\II~ *14. CONSIDERA.TION 0 PARTIAL PA ESTIMATE {J4, 0 UNIVERSAL 'K & I: ~'ORRS J I . J IN TH~ Å.~OU~7 jJF $90,i02.~ - DAVJ~ BOULEVARD : M. G ./'STORAGE TANK APPROVED ~.I' .¡?CONSIDERA.TION OF ,;1 PARTI.AL PAYMENT, ,// ESTIMATE 04 TO ADS: ROAD COMP MTY IN TH: AMOUNT OF $47,050.~ - SNOW HEIGHTS STR~ A11) DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED c}' ,/ f" ./ - -.... .,....... *15. CONSIDERA.TION OF PARTIAL PAYMENT, ESTIMATE #8 M"'D FI? TO AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY IN THE A..}.fO: OF $22,284.63 - O~ DRIVE A}.."D DAt..TN DRI· PAVING AND DRAINAG: IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *16. /"",,/ CONSIDERATION OF CONSTRUCTL~G RIGHT- TURN LANE AT TI:E SOUTHEAST CORl~tR 0: RUFE SNO~T DRI\TE 1ù\-: NORTHEAST LOOP 820 APPROVED *17. ;// ) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE CONTROLL: WATER A..~'"D SE~~R TÞ~ ORDINANCE NO. 1034 APPROVED 18. Council~an Kenna moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Ramsey, to apprpve Ordinance no. 1035, delete last sentence in pa~'graph two. carried 7-0., CONSIDERA.TION OF ORD I~ANCE FOR THE ABATEl'-ŒNT OF DANGEROUS BUILDING~ ORDINANCE NO. 1035 APPROVED ~~~~~_.....,,~~ ..·..."-..~_.A,. .."'_.0;0""'-". or ,.......,...r;.."'" :"'·_"-'-""-"--~"..~..q"w---~_...._.It"._...__",,__-..-______ __ 1 .---. I . - I .' 4 . ,.'J~. I I"" I I I I I I L.t I I I I I I I -' I ( r KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 19, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-155 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-6-T-PD TO R-7-MF-PD REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 128 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this ca$e be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manaqer Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoni.ng Review PZ 85-155 1 Page 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I ORDINANCE NO. 1348 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-155 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-6-T-PD to R-7-MF-PD. Tract 5 BEING a tract of land situated in the W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod at the southeast corner of Meadow Lakes Drive (an 80-foot R.O.W.); said point being 80.00 feet South 27 degrees 12 minutes 37 seconds West from the southeast corner of Lot 57, Block 1, Meadow Lakes First Filing, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, as recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 27, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 27 degrees 12 minutes 37 seconds West, a distance of 3.56 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the left having a central angle of 47 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds, a radius of 284.78 feet and a tangent length of 125.31 feet; THENCE southwesterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 236.09 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE South 20 degrees i7 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 151.03 fe~t to a point for corner; THENCE South 69 degrees 42 minutes 37 seconds West, a distance of 160.00 teet to a point at the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 28 degrees 30 minutes 13 seconds, a radius of 924.96 feet, a tangent length of 234.94 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of South 06 degrees 02 minutes 17 seconds East, 455.42 feet; THENCE southeasterly along said non-tangent curve to the right, an arc distance of 460.15 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE South 15 degrees 23 minutes 24 seconds West, a distance of 76.67 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 85 degrees 14 minutes 22 seconds West, a distance of 651.60 feet to a point for corner; I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I Page 2 THENCE North 34 degrees 13 minutes 01 seconds West, a distance of 349.86 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 59 degrees 28 minutes 04 seconds West, a distance of 503.81 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 43 degrees 03 minutes 03 seconds East, a distance of 354.23 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 77 degrees 54 minutes 15 seconds East, a distance of 562.36 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 60 degrees 58 minutes 11 seconds East, a distance of 473.09 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 38 degrees 42 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of 64.86 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the left having a central angle of 24 degrees 10 minutes 38 seconds, a radius of 298.85 and a tangent length of 64.01 feet; THENCE southeasterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 126.11 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE South 62 degrees 53 minutes 36 seconds East, a distance of 25.54 feet to the point of beginning and containing 22.0943 acres of land. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f' I Page 3 This property is located west of Rufe Snow Drive, between Meadow Lakes Drive and Riviera Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. .f)~æ¡$~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ,;- '~ COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-155 IS HEREBY REZONED R-7-MF-PD THIS 10th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM A~1D LEGAL TTY : ATTORNEY \ I" I .... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: _Ubject: Plånning and Development 2/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PS 85-92 Request of Roger Hanson for Final Plat Approval of Lots 1-7, Block 1 Nob Hill North Addition This Final Plat Approval is presented for consideration of Lots 1-7, Block 1, Nob Hill North Addition. The subject property is an undeveloped office tract located on southwest corner of Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road. The purpose for the proposed plat is to allow the applicant to subdivide the tract into lots for development of an office complex. The Staff noted for Commission consideration several items requiring discussion and action. A. The proposed interior street, Huntington Square, is designated as a private street. The applicants wish to build an aesthetic entrance to the proposed office complex and allow some parking arrangements which would not be allowed on a public street. The only difficulty created by the proposed design is the fact that the interior lots in the subdivision will have access only to the private street. Specific arrangements will be required to identify and provide for continuous maintenance responsibility for the street in the future. B. Both Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road are included in the Thoroughfare Plan. The Applicants are proposing to construct their portion of both streets with this development. In the Engineer's letter he indicates that the required right of way for Precinct Line Road should be 110 feet in accordance with the Plan standards. However, the various cities which are responsible for the improvements to the street have agreed that a right of way of 100 feet will be sufficient to construct the street. The applicant's portion of the 100 foot right of way is shown on the plat. c. The proposed lots located on Amundson Road are shown to have a 25 foot front building line along the street. The lots with frontage on Precinct Line are shown to have a 15 foot building line on the street. In all cases the actual frontage of the proposed lots will be toward the private street. The applicant has interpreted the Ordinance as to allow the street to be designated as a side yard. This distinction is not made in the Ordinance.· The set-back should be 25 feet from Precinct Line Road. D. No building set-back is indicated from the proposed private street. Although the Ordinance does not dictate the requirement some consideration should be given to establishing a consistent set-back from the private street. Finanpe Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ( VM/~ nt Heaa Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 2 I" I I I I I I I I I I I I -I II I , I , ,', CI RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Plat Application PS 85-92 proposing Lots 1-7, Block 1, Nob Hill Addition with the following stipulations. (1) A Condominium Agreement be provided requiring the maintenance of the private street by the adiacent property owners. (2) The 0-1 Zoning designation be shown on the Final Plat. (3) A 25 foot building line set-back be shown on Precinct Line Road. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Page 2 0 1-2- 1600 R-I 1-' I AG ¡-2 I R-3 PS ~ s· "'1 MART/ti I I....!R ~. PS IS· ¿'!- NO if} HIl..l.- I., JZ-2 A P. I D .. ; 4 .. g ~ AG L. R-3 I / I I , ~' I I I ' \ \, \ , \ , , ' \ " \ \ \ \ \ :f=' p AG n .... I '.,» I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I , I ( (" MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, JANUARY 23, 1986 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Mark Wood at 7:30 P. M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Vice Chairman Secretary Members Mark Wood John Schwinger Marjorie Nash Joe Hallford Carole Flippo Richard Royston Wanda Calvert Alt. Member Dir. Planning/Dev. P & Z Coordinator ABSENT: Don Bowen CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 9, 1986 Ms. Nash made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. 1. PS 85-92 Request of Roger Hanson for final plat of Lots 1-7, Block I, Nob Hill North Addition. Vice Chairman Wood called the representative of this request to please come forward. David Barfield came forward to represent Roger Hanson. Vice Chairman Wood asked Mr. Barfield if the developer plans to'have a condo agreement to take care of the private street. Mr. Barfield stated they will have a condo agreement, the same as in the residential Nob Hill Addition which will have brick streets and surrounded by a concrete wall. Vice Chairman Wood stated the lots on Precinct Line Road show a 15 foot building line, but the ordinance requires a 25 foot building line. I Ie I I I , I I I Ie I I I I I I I r I -.Þt Page 2 P & Z Minutes January 23, 1986 PS 85-92 APPROVED ( [ Mr. Barfield said he has a client who objects to a 25 foot building line. Vice Chairman Wood asked what the building set back would be on the private street. Mr. Barfield stated they would set back 25 feet from the curb except for Lot #5 in the cuI de sac which has an existing building on it. He said it has a 20 foot set back. Vice Chairman Wood asked Mr. Royston if there was a need for the 25 foot set back on Precinct Line Road. Mr. Royston stated it would be on a major thoroughfare. Mr. Schwinger stated the 0-1 zoning had been left off the plat. Mr. Barfield stated they would take care of that. Mr. Schwinger made a motion to approve PS 85-92 with the provision of a condo agreement for the maintenance of the street and the 0-1 zoning be affixed to the plat. This motion died for lack of a second. Ms. Nash stated she was not in favor of the 15 foot set ' back on Precinct Line Road. Mr. Barfield stated they had rather have the 15 foot set back, but they could live with the 25 foot set back. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 85-92 with the following stipulations: I-That 0-1 zoning be affixed to the plat; 2-Provide a condo agreement for the maintenance of the street; 3-A 25 foot building line be put on Precinct Line Road. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. I~ -r, ! :e¡ 1,', :1, ' I I I: J, I I:/! ! I Ie I I I I. I I I f ~< '", 1'~,:~',' > "-, ':', ;", 1'·"/· (~ Stembridge & Associates, Inc. I - 'Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: NOB HILL NORTH ADDITION, Lots 1 Thru 7, Block 1, FinalPlat~ PS 85-92. In response to Knowlton-Engllsh-Flowers letter 31, 1985, we offer the following comments: (~ 1. Regarding Items in the letter of September 20, 1985: The design for the proposed drainage has been ,submitted with the plans. We have indicat~~ ~ 25' Building Line along Amundson Road. ' We have included plans for Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road. We have moved all the sanitary sewer services to the Ce¡1,'ter of ,the lot except for Lots 4 and 5 as we feel that they can be served from the rear since the rear of the lots are the low side of the lots. (Item 1) . 5) . 1) . (Item 11) 2. According to Mr. Royston, Director of Development, an 'agreement has been made between the Cities of Hurst and North Richland Hills to obtain only 100 feet of right-of- way for Precinct Line Road in this area. ~ . ~'--f'. . 4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . I~ ~,- I' e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I , I ( ( NOB HILL NORTH ADDITION Lots 1 Thru 7, Block 1 Page 2 3. The owner is aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures and all other applicable City Development Codes. If there should be any further questions regarding this project, please call. Sincerely, DRS/et cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development I" Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I , I """ . ... . \ ( r , KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 31, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-943, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NOB HILL NORTH ADDITION, LOTS 1 THRU 7 BLOCK 1, FINAL PLAT, PS 85 - 92, GRID MAP 72 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 Please see our letter dated September 20, 1985, PS 85-72; item 1, regarding drainage; item 5, regarding building set back line; item 7, regarding prorata for future improvements of Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road; and item 11, regarding sanitary sewer service lines. 2 Precinct Line Road is a proposed r,16D Thoroughfare with a 110 foot right-af-way width, therefore, an additional 5 feet should be dedicated for the right-of-way. 3 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Counc 1. and-::overedin writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~~,~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R~JA/ra Enclosures 1901 CENTRAL OR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I ~ '" I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I , I ( ( Subdivision Review Letter continued NOB HILL NORTH ADDITION cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Oecember 31, 1985 PS 85 - 92 PAGE 2 I- I Ie I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I , I ~ { rf KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas September 20, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-943, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NOB HILL NORTH ADDITION, LOTS 1-7 BLOCK 1, PRELIMINARY PLAT, PS 85 - 72, GRID MAP 72 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 We would note, for the record, that a portion of this proposed development drains to Precinct Line Road. We assume that the off-site storm drain systems in the developments in Hurst on the east side of Precinct Line Road have been designed with sufficient capacity to handle runoff from this proposed development. We also anticipate that existing undersized culverts which cross Precinct Line Road will be redesigned and replaced in connection with future Precinct Line Road paving and drainage construction. Meanwhile, we would suggest that the Developer notify the Hurst Public Works Department concerning this proposed development and verify that such downstream drainage systems are in place and are being properly maintained. 2 The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of the final plat. 3 We note that the plans submitted to our office for review are stamped "ReviewSet, Not forConstruction". Although this submittal is preliminarYJ the plans submitted for ;"eview should accurately reflect actual proposedconstructiün. Any de', -:at.icn from reviewed and Corrmission/Council approved construction plans should be noted on "AS-built" plans and a copy of such as-builts transmitted to our office and the City for updating permanent Public Works records. 4 The distance on the south line of plat is not the same as the distance in .the metes and bounds description. S A 2S-foot building setback along Amundson Road should be added. 1901 CENTRAL DR_, SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I~ I Ie I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I , I ( Subdivision Review Letter continued ~ -( \ NOB HILL NORTH ADDITION 6 The right-of-way of Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road should be shown. Amundson Road is a proposed C4U Thoroughfare with a 68-foot right-of-way width and Precinct Line Road is a proposed M6D Thoroughfare with a lID-foot right-of-way width. 7 The developer should escrow his prorata share of future improvements on Precinct Line Road and Amundson Road or construct such improvements at this time. Plans and profiles of the proposed construction should be submitted for review. 8 The adjacent lots should be responsible for the upkeep of the proposed alley, however, a sanitary sewer line is shown in the alley. Therefore, we would suggest that the alley shown on the plat be flagged as an "Ingress, Egress Easement" or "Private Alley". A separate easement should be provided for the sanitary sewer main to provide City access for maintenance purposes unless directed otherwise by the Public Works Department. 9 What is a G. U. Easement? 10 The size of the water and sewer services should be shown. 11 The sanitary sewer service lines should be moved to the center of the lots. 12 Street and sanitary sewer profiles should be included in the final construction plans. 13 The fire hydrant coverage based on 300-foot radius criteria should be shown. 14 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of the 12-inch water line in Precinct Line Road if he has not already paid. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for one half of an equivalent 8-inch line for a total length of 419.14 feet. 15 As a genetal reminder, the Developer or' GWiler should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. September 20, 1985 PS 85 - 72 2 PAGE . ~ I' · ); I Ie I I I I I I -- I I I I I .- i , I { ( NOB HILL NORTH ADDITION Subdivision Review Letter continued RW A / r a Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development September 20, 1985 PS 85 - 72 PAGE 3 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 2/10/86 Request of Jas. B. & Donna L. Hamm for Replat Agenda Number: PS 85-94 of Lots 4RA and 4RB, 6 and 7, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lots 4RA, 4RB, 6 and 7, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition. The property is located on the north side of Browning Court west of Wuligar Way. The purpose for the proposed replat is to subdivide the property for development. The applicants propose to construct industrial buildings on the lots designated 4RA and 4RB. All of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Replat Application PS 85-94 proposing Lots 4RA, 4RB, 6 and 7, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition as submitted. ~ Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ß1~ I City anager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Paae 1 of 1_ I I' I I I ¡ ~ I I Ie I I I I I I I t- I. 1-2 1194 R-7-MF LR S l U-PD t'ttf!" (),. .. () I I I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I I I I 4. I Page 3 P & Z Minutes January 23, 1986 2. PS 85-94 PS 85-94 APPROVED 3. PS 85-96 PS 85-96 APPROVED PS 85-97 PS 85-99 ( r Request of James B. & Donna L. Hamm for replat of Lots 4RA, 4RB, 6 & 7, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition. Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PS 85-94. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Fenimore-Frank, Inc. for final plat of Western Oaks Addition. Vice Chairman Wood called for the representative of this request to please come forward. Jackie Fluitt with Stembridg Associates came forward. Vice Chairman Wood as d if the issue of the Lone Star Ga easement had been resolved. Mr. Fluitt s d it had not been resolved, t they hope to get it resolve ithin the next few days. Vic Chairman Wood said it would have be resolved before going to the City Council with this plat. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PS 85-96 subject to getting the Lone Star Gas easement resolved. This motion was seconded by Ms, Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Crow-Nowlin Associates, HI for replat of Lot 2R, Block 4, University Plaza Addition. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 85-97. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. Request of H & S Partnership for final plat of Royal Court Addition. I " I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t- I ( ( 817 336-5773 Metro 429-8306 ~v TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS fJtYU.~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS January 7, 1986 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Industrial Park Addition Lots 4RA and 4RB, Block 3 Replat Dear Commission Members: We are in receipt of your engineer's review letter for the subject project and offer the following comments: 1. We have now complied wi th County requirements and have properly noted the property corner monumentation on the plat. 2. We assume that all utility companies have been notified by the City of North Richland Hills relative to this replat. We have not included any additional easements for these utility companies as we have not heard from the City regarding this matter. However, should there be any need for additional easements, our client will be glad to add these to the plat. 3. We have revised the lot number designations per your engineer's conurients, and these are properly reflected on the enclosed replat. 4. Comment No. 4 of the engineer' 5 letter indicate~' tllé.\t the previo'us pl::l:1 submitted for t':~h.i¿~.: subdivision did not inàicate 6-inch service lines under Browning Court to serve this lot. We have checked our files, and find that the service line size was indicated on the submi tted plans, and it was noted as a 6-inch service line. In order to justify the size of line constructed, we have prepared the enclosed analysis of the capacity of this line in relationship to the amount of flow in the line generated by the proposed development. We have included only Lots 4RA and 4RB in this analysis since additional service lines have been provided to 915 Florence Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 I' I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I i' I ( ( Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills January 7, 1986 Page Two Lots 5 and 6 as is noted on the sewer layout sheet in these plans. We trust that after reviewing our analysis of the impact of the sewage discharge into this service line, you will see that the demand on the line during peak flow conditions is only 4.8% of the capacity of this same line. Therefore, based on this analysis, we would respectfully request that you waive this requirement for an 8" service line. 5. In Comment 5 of your engineer's letter mention was made of providing evidence showing the developer's desire to minimize detrimental visual and noise impacts on the adjacent neighborhood to the north. As was suggested in the comment, we will be glad to provide for such environmental considerations in the City-Developer Agreement. 6. We have added the drainage certification statement as requested by your engineer to the drainage layout in the plans. 7. We are aware of the responsibili ties Item 7 of the engineer's letter, agreement with same. outlined and are in in Should you have any further questions concerning this subdivision, please do not hesitate'to call. Very truly yours, TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS, INC. JRP/bgd Perkins, P.E. cc: Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Mr. Richard Albin, P.E. I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,~ TEAGUE NALL AND ( tKINS, INC. Consulting Engineers 915 Florence Street FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 (817) 336-5773 Metro (817) 429-8306 JOB~S /4-2- SHEET NO. J CALCULATED BY~ OF 2 DATE 1/) !Ji56 , CHECKED BY DATE SCALE A..v ~ L 'f .:s '-.5 4-RA .t 4Rð ~ ß La <-I< 3 ') t -:£,v DcJ::5, AI A L- Þ--1R. rz A.~r ¡.) ... 4B v, L b,,,.,J C. S ~A~. llø. òf"F1 <=-E!lA/AR.£~oJ~E tJ,J, ~ 5 (4- } ~.. AL~ <;..) >/,./t E-:5 .,.. ~ 0 M.. .þ~ Ù ~ , ..,..... .f\!'.A JI... . 2.J 5 c::. oS -. J? Þ ~-A. L,),.) I -,- MAX.. Ie::> ~ÞL¿I þ~ VN'-r' EL~U..yc::-A L-~vLA~'~~ (F ft.Ð N\ JlovN , ~ -s ) : 2ç'j 4J / 4qA'A/ DA~ (ôFF. C-I£ ß L"ß ~. ) é 'bJ"\T~ OA-rA,~Cb F~^^ '})e:s,~^"" c::::..R.. \ ~~1~ F-öÆ 5~~G;E 5" ~.-~ 8" "'-e-)(A~ D fE:'{.),. of H£'AL,- f-{ ~ ~CXA..:S ~£P-r - Co F W A~ k..r= .5.ou A-<:.£"~ . (." v~ 1""'-5 -,<., C> P~oÞ L£ Iv,...) \,.. X. "2.0 G:.q L·I<C4AI~/ 1\1'= ~.. 3.,2-60 .<G A L. I bA' 14- .. .ÞEY\K,AlG FA~~J2.. -:1 + 4- ~nt;;õ ::: 4./ ~ I PROIU:T 204-1 !N€EiS! Inc.. Groton. Mass. 01411. I' I I I I I I I I ... TEAGUE NAll AND ( IKINS, INC. Consulting Engineers 915 Florence Street FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 (817) 336-5773 Metro (817) 429-8306 JOB~3 S J 4. 2- SHEET NO. '- CALCULA TED BY --.Ù R../-' OF 7- DATE I 1'7 lab I I CHECKED BY DATE -r~1 E'R.€:FÐJLE:..) Þ ~K.. FLo.tAJ ~3.J ¿ c::ÐQ X 4. I£? = J3,3""1 f-t:;,AL. In TUE · 6"S €\..V €'P- :S ~ v, C-E L, ~ E T c:a ..." H-€ VI 4¡V ~ LE" «..vl'þ- t::.o~s.-rA.~ ~T~ C;t,J A O.bðk. G.~:b£ {S£"ft.\ltC-ê: L,¡..Jê.s r'f"C:>""'A,~ 5er<.\/\ £.e. L/~ € ~ IL.L .Be: ~,.J'!:J7"A.v c-T~ ~ J.QL/C>G:M:b € (:; £E ~LAN.s) ') j --('1-/ E::f>..€-FQJt'£~ (V\ IIV'^^U,,^- ~AA C-.I ~'f è)f' ¿ 'I S~VI <-E WAJ € ,¡o..J S ..,..Jt€'ir"\..:= 2. 8o,o~~ I I I I I I I þ~.~ rLe ~ ....c.A..þ ~ IT,! 3,37b ~ :: 4: g 4:) /0 <s F <AI' A.~fTY t.>.s~ V µ J) ~ þ ~ K.. rLo t..V...... <4~·fr' a 2...80, <:) <3 G I PROOn 204-1 L NË:BS line.. Groton, Mass. 01471. I'" I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I p " ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas December 31, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-897, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION, LOTS 4R2A, 4R2B, BLOCK 3, REPLA T, PS 85 - 94, GRID MAP 102 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 In accordance with County requirements, property corner monumentation should be noted on the plat. 2 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 3 We would suggest the lot numbers be changed from 4R2A and 4R2B to 4RA and 4RB. Lot 4R2A and 4R2B gives the impression that a previously platted Lot 4R2 has been revised, rather than that Lot 4 has been revised. 4 The Public Works Department has indicated that the existing 6-inch sanitary sewer service lines which are located under Browning Court are not in compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirement that 8-inch lines should be used to serve all industrial or commercial properties. We would note that previous plans submitted tö our office for review did not show the 6-inch service lines under Browning Court, therefore we were not aware that undersized lines were constructed. If the Public Works Department so directs, the developer will be required to replace the ex:sting 6-inch 1 ines ,,,it;', 8-· nch 1 ines unless you ~'/aive this requirement. We have no engineering objection to use of the 6-inch service lines if the developer's engineer can provide calculations, supported by field data, which verify that the capacity of these lines is sufficient to handle future peak flows without causing any surcharging or back-ups into the proposed facilities. Final recommendation of approval by the Public Works Department is still required, however. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I' I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I i' I .\0,6 , ~ ( ( Subdivision Review Letter continued INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION 5 Since this proposed development is adjacent to the Sunnybrook residential neighborhood in Watauga, we would suggest that the Developer provide evidence which shows his desire to minimize detrimental visual and noise impacts on the adjacent neighorhood. Provisions for such environmental considerations should be included in the City-Developer Agreement. 6 In accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements the Developer's Engineer should affix the following certification to the drainage plan: 6.1 I, , a professional engineer registered in the State of Texas, have prepared this drainage study in compliance with the latest published requirements and criteria of the City of North RichJand Hills, and have verified that the topographic information used in this study is in compliance with said requirements and is otherwise suitable for developing this workable overall Plan of Drainage which can be implemented through proper subsequent detailed construction planning. SIGNATURE , P. E . SEA L 7 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, \later and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. RI~~o/; ~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development December 31, 1985 PS 85 - 94 PAGE 2 I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I ~ , , , I I I ~ ~ Planning and Development Department: 2/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PS 85-96 Request of Fenimore-Franks Inc. for Final Plat Approval of Western Oaks Addition This Final Plat Application is presented for consideration of Western Oaks Addition. The property involved is located on the south side of Bursey Road west of Douglas Lane. The tract is currently zoned R-3 Single Family. The applicants propose to develop a residential subdivision in conformance with the R-3 criteria. The Staff noted several items for Commission consideration on the proposed plat. A. Bursey Road is designated as a four lane undivided Collector Street. The required right of way is 68 feet. The plat, as submitted, contains sufficient dedication to accomplish the southern half of the full right of way. However, the northern half of the street at full development will be in the City of Keller and cannot be obtained or controlled by the applicant. The applicants propose to construct their one-half of the street at the time of development. B.In the Engineer's letter attention is called to several lots, primarily located around the proposed cul-de-sacs, which do not appear to meet the required lot minimums. The surveyor has submitted his calculations which show that all of the lots with the exception of three can meet all of the required minimums. Lots 9, 10, and 11, Block 3, have a a front building line which is deficient by 0.3 feet each. The applicant requested that the Commission approve this deviation on the plat. C. The proposed plat indicates a five foot dedication on Douglas Lane. This dedication is required in order to complete the 50 foot right of way requirement. The applicant will also be required to construct his half of the street as a condition of development. D. Lone Star Gas Company has an existing high-pressure gas line in an existing easement on the south side of Bursey Road adjacent to the proposed subdivision. The applicants have not provided ~he size of easement required by Lone Star Gas for the existing line. Negotiations are still ongoing between the applicant and the gas company. The final form of the easement should be resolved prior to City Council approval of the plat. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Plat Application PS 85-96 requesting Final Plat approval of Western Oaks Addition with the stipulation that the easement disagreement with Lone Star Gas be resolved prior to City Council action. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available 1211 /~ t Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Paqe 1 of 1 .. '" AG AG - I I {' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I Page 3 P & Z Minutes January 23, 1986 ( ( 2. PS 85-94 Request of James B. na L. Hamm for replat 0 s 4RA, 4RB, 6 & 7, Blo ndustrial Park Addition. Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PS 85-94. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 5-0. 3. PS 85-96 Request of Fenimore-Frank, Inc. for final plat of Western Oaks Addition. Vice Chairman Wood called for the representative of this request to please come forward. Jackie Fluitt with Stembridge and Associates came forward. Vice Chairman Wood asked if the issue of the Lone Star Gas easement had been resolved. Mr. Fluitt said it had not been resolved, but they hope to get it resolved within the next few days. Vice Chairman Wood said it would have to be resolved before going to the City Council with this plat. PS 85-96 APPROVED Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PS 85-96 subject to getting the Lone Star Gas easement resolved. This rnotion 'was seconded by Ms ~ Nash and the Ino "t: ton carried 5--0!3 ,. """..r....,.~IIfI!~..'..~..........,~. . ....,---.. '.. "..."........_,.."" ~-,- '..... - '----~.-.".. 4. PS 85-97 T~.,.,_.-.".,.....~~_.. Request of Crow-Nowlin Associates, for replat of Lot 2R, Block University Plaza Addit PS 85-97 APPROVED Ms. Nash to approve PS~Ÿ~ 7. This motion was seconded ~. Hallford and the motion carried ~ 5-0. ~~-~ ~ PS 85::2-9~/ ~.-.r: - --------- by 5. Request of H & S Partnership for final plat of Royal Court Addition. I I {' ( ~~ ~~ ~" , , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I tt I Mr. R. S. Williams TESCO Region Engr. Supervisor P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth, TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number: PS 85-96 Western Oak Addition Address or Location: Southwest corner of Bursey & Douglas Lane Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert. Planning and Zoning Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (I) copy of this form no later than 1/16/86. ./' Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made. (See Comments) COMMENTS: TESCO: DATE: I- /3-8~ SIGNATUR~µAl~ SIGNATURE 2.t/~ ~ CITY: DATE: Jan. 8, 1986 I I If! --- -~-~_ _-~-__~ ~:_____~__ - (, . ---- . '. -- ~ (/ - cl~, /}f/~/ /~.__ . ----/-/~- ~[,-----_._---------- _..........~._-.._.-._._..~ ~--- -" ----- - - - ..-......- .'-" _. --.. -, ~. ..- .'-' .,,-- ...--....... . , ....... .--.....--................. '.-- ...-....- -~.- .-- ~ .._-_..,----~,-_. .....-...-..-- I--------_~-__-L"'o--~-- --W é1, N d a. .-C ~ ¡ Ll ~J2f- __: __. _ .. _ ._ _ . _ _____ _ _:-___________ -. --- - ------ -- .~,--- ----------...--C-l 'tYðF... NO£7H_I?t<:,A téJA/vi_J../lLJ....5. _.______________~_____ ~===-~==~==-~- ~~.~~~ 1------------~~5~ -O/,.......~~--6~I..~-~-~- 1-----------.-i-~--~-~-1r~ ~-- H '... J----- --_._---~~ --~~ --- ..._~.~~~---- I----------_L~.~~ .~.~ ~__~_./.¢__~~ 1---------· ,~-~---~~ --.~ ~~------- --··-·-·-------_._..._H -- ~_a.. Së:7_~__~~ _ -.------------.-~-8~~ ...~ -/J~~~_ - . ~~~~-- ~- 1------' -~__~ · ._~~ I ~-~-~:p~~~ ~~ . -----. ..-. ------.. ._~~~~------ I .; s~--~--~~YJ,(~_~~_ -----------_L~__~~__ ~tI.~,~~~ê-p.J.-..-ç/~-~-<=~~_-- _ ! L-----~-~---¡} . . ...... ____,~~-_~~--_ -~-~~- ----- r- I -- ..------------ ----..._-~ ---ß-~___ -~_.~~~-~- --!iS4'.R--~~~_M_ -~~_'1f¿~_~ 2~¿~¿ L--~c.:___P.a.~(:.._ç.~ -_J-S_§~J)~ -.-----------.-----..--------------- t' I , ¡ -.---..---..----.------- J -... .~., .: ~, I :e I': 1'- I I I" I I Ie' I: I' I I I I, I t!, >:~ : . ' , IJ;}f~lJ~:::,~.·' '~; -!", " ¡:' ," .,~ '> ,; "'1" < 4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ( ( ," . is our client's preference that the WESTERN OAKS ADDITION. ~ ,~ & 3~ ,See letter, from Brooks-Baker Surveyors. 4. . The Plans were stamped "Review Not For Construction" because they are for the City's review and it is possible that changes will be made after such review and we do not want any incorrect plans in the possession of the inspector's ~n the field. ' 5. See letter from Brooks-Baker Surveyors. . . . J. ~. ,. 6. Since our client has no dontrolof the property on the north side of Bursey Road, wè réquest that you waive this provision. 7. Thru 11. See letter from Brooks-Baker Surveyors~ 12. We have relocated the Sanitary Sewer Services to the center of the lot in all cases where possible. ~, 13. We are still in contact with Lone Star Gas regarding the width of the easement for their.Ex~sting 4" gas line. The ""~>,~:,.+r." size of the Existing PetroleùDi is 8" and we have contacted . c, "Mr. Max Hornsby of Amber Refining Company and he requested us ,. :tosend him a copy of the plans. He suggested that we encase 'i'·'·i ,.,1;' <":,('~,..'> our line. ;, 't· , 14. We have installed 16" saddles on each side lowering on our plans as Mr. Albin suggested. I' I IfI I- I, I 1< I·. I Ie I I I I I 1 I , I 'fIT ( ( WESTERN OAKS ADDITION PS 86-96 Page 2 15. We have contacted the property owners north of Bursey Road, but they will not sign any documents as they currently have a contract of sale on the property and probably will not ,be able to respond to us until after February 1, 1986. 16. We have been in contact with Mr. Clark of the Trinity River Authority and we have enclosed their meter station plans in ours and we will submit our plans for their review. 17. It is our client's intention to install the Drainage facilities in Bursey Road and pay pro-rata on the Paving improvements on Bursey and Douglas Lane. '18. The owner has been made aware that he is responsible for complying with all provisions of the City's policies, ordinances, and procedures. If there are any further questions regarding this project, please call us. Sincerely, ~l~~- .E. DRS/et cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr'. Al1er~, Bl"onstadI Assistant Diro of Public Works ,Mr. Ricll~i'l.~d Royston., Director of- De'~'elopment ", ----- /'~" ../ _/- I .f I I' I I I I I I -- !I I I I I I I (' I ( ( ESTABLISHED 1880 GAREY W. GILLEY DON W. HICKEY C. RICHARD DAVIS. ""R. BROOKES BAKER SURVEYORS BROOKES BAKER (1902-1955) JOHN F. BAKER. CONSULTANT S, "". BAKER. CONSULTANT FRED M. MORRIS. CONSULTANT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION TITLE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING BROOKES BAKER BUILDING - 511 E, BLUFF STREET 817-335-7151 METRO 429-6119 FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76102 January 9, 1986 Mr. Delbert Stembridge Stembridge & Associates, Inc. 4028 Daley North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: Western Oaks Addition PS 85-96 Dear Mr. Stembridge: In response to the review letter dated December 30, 1985, we offer the following: 1. Item # 2 Shown on the enclosed map. 2. Item #3 Has been added to the map. 3. Item #5 ROW of Bursey Road has been added to the map. 4. Item #7 All building lines are shown on the map. The rear building line on lots along Bursey are controlled by zoning and should not be shown on the map. 5. Item #8 Has been addressed in a meeting with Richard Royston. 6. Item #9 The lots in question have been recalculated and the lots that cannot maintain a 65 T length at the building line are listed on "Exhibit A." We will need to ask for variances for these lots. 7. Item # 10 Lot 42, Block 4 has 7,501 square feet and the lot summary is attatched. 8. Item # 11 The Utility and Drainage easements requested have been added to the mapo We are still in contact with Lone Star Gas regarding the necessary width needed for their existing 4" line. They have promised to resolve this early next week. However, I feel that we should get conditional approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission and revise the map to show the agreed width before submittal to Council. If you have any questions, please call. Si::ã ~ ~ WrL___ Stephen ~rson I ( I Ie I I Block I 3 3 I 3 I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I "EXHIBIT A" Lot No. -- 9 10 11 ( Building Line Length 64.70 64.70 64.70 ESTABLISHED I eeo BROOKES BAKER SURVEYORS I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I ( lOT SUMMRRY BlK 3 lOT 9 RADIRL BR6 IN: HE 71 13 48.00 - - - --- - -....... - - -------.. ..-- --__... - eo __ _ _ _ _ ______ _ ______ __,.... __ _~.. __ _ _~ _ ___...__~.____ ..__. _.._ DELTR- 19 25 31. 00 R= 50.00 R= 13.13 C= 41. 81 T = 23.01 97 1,222.78i 1,11 7. 281 - - - ---... -- - - ----.. --.. - - ..--- ---- - -.. -.---- --... --- --- -........... -....... -- -.. --- --.. -- --------- -- ----- RADIAL BR6 OUT:SU 21 i8 17.00 RADIUS PI 52 1,236.373 1,165.102 P.C. TO P. r. 97 SE 10 28 57.50 11. 81 98 i , 190. 986 i,11i.i2S 98 SU 21 18 17. 00 106. 75 100 1,094. 084 1,099.611 100 su sa 00 18.00 59. 37 77 1,092.017 ",010.307 ?? HE o 02 '8.00 t 09. 05 96 i ,201. 067 1,010.380 96 HE 74 13 19.63 79. 91 97 1,222. 781 i , t 1 7. 282 97 1,222. 781 1,117. 284 Sf 77 18 12.16 0.00 CLOSING LIHE 398.212 01sr TRRU 262,225.632 PRECISION -------- -- --- -----.. ----.. ....--------- AREA 9890.55 Sf .2271 ACRES -.......------- ---- -- ---------.. ---- - - --- LOT 10 RADIAL 8RG IN: HE 21 18 17.00 - - - --- - --..- - -.... -- - - ~--..-.. -- - ---.. ---.. -- - - -..... __ 4It.. _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ __.... __ __ _... ___ ......... _... _ __....._ DELTA- 49 25 31. 00 R= 50.00 R= 43.13 c= 11. 81 T = 23.01 98 1,190. 986 i ,111. 125 -- ----.....--- --- ------------...-- -- ---..---- ---.. -- ---------.... - -..- .....------------- --....--..... RADIAL BRG our: SE 21 37 11. 00 RRDIUS PI 52 1,236.373 i ,165.102 P.C. TO P.T. 98 SE 89 51 29.50 41. 91 99 4,190.919 4,186.232 99 SE 21 37 11.00 101. 58 101 1,098.571 1,228.551 101 SU 88 00 1 B. 00 12B.99 100 1,094. 083 4,099.639 100 HE 21 i8 17. DO 106. 75 98 1,190.985 1,111.12'1 98 4,190.9B6 <1, í 11. 125 N[ 56 58 11. 73 0.00 CLOSING LINE 380.152 015T TRAU 188,733.232 PRECISIOH --~---- ----- ........ ------------- ---.-- ARER 7915. 51 Sf . 1821 ACRES .. --~---.._-..- ..-..--......,. - -..----........ ----- LOT 11 RADIRl BRG IN: HU 21 37 J t 00 - - - ---------- - -- - - - -- -... -- - - - - - - -- - - --- -- - - - -- - - - --...... - -- --... - - ------- - -- - - - --- - ----- DEL TA- 19 25 13.89 R= 50.00 R= 13. 13 c= i1. 81 T = 23.01 99 1,190.919 1,186.232 - -------- --- ----- - ----------- --- ------------- --- ------- ---------- --------- ---- ---- RADIAL BRG OUT: S[ 71 02 57.89 RADIUS PT 52 1,236.373 1,165.102 P.C. TOP.r. 99 HE 'f0 39 54. OS 41. 81 91 i ,222.633 1,213.177 91 SE 71 02 13.00 79. 98 90 1,200.618 i 1290.376 90 su o 02 18.00 99.92 79 1~100. 728 1,290.309 79 su 88 00 18. 00 61. 80 101 1 ~ 098.576 1,228.516 , 01 NU 21 37 14. 00. 1 01. 58 99 t190.922 4.186.227 (- I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I SE 53 12 ~4157 :J.C~ CLSSING L~N( 386. i15 DISI TRAU 71 ,163.886 PRECISION -- ....---------- -- -.---- --- - ......_-......~-- RR£A 9490.00 Sf .2179 RCReS - -- - --- - - - - -...- - --.. - _ _.. 4t.. _ ...._..._ __ _.._ '-- e I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I lOT SUMt1ARV BLK 3 lOT 19 RADIAL BRG IN: HE 32 30 1?1 S ( 29B 1,203. i22 ( i J '03.610 ....... ~ --.... -.......... --.........- -. -..-- ----.. -.. -- --.. _ ...... 41-'''''_" ___.. _~__ ___ __...... _ ____.. _ __ ...._. ______ 23. 91 O[lTR- 51 06 49.00 R= 50.00 R= it 61 C= 13.11 T= --.- ......... ...----..----...-......---------- --....- -... ..,.. ----- -_..,.------ .....-..-----.......---..-....-- RROIRL BR6 OUT :5E 18 36 31.85 RADIUS PT P.C. TOP.L 298 SE 83 03 07.35 299 S[ 1 0 33 39.12 300 SU 88 00 18. 26 297 HE 10 S6 13.08 S£ 52 08 05.69 120.115 OIST TRRU 213,719.656 PR£CISIOH -..... --..--....---....--........--...--- -------..-- RREA 9089. 71 Sf .2087 RCR£S -- .....--.. ---- ....-- ------....-....--- ------ lOT 20 RADIRL BR6 IN: tfU 18 36 31.85 281 , ,215.589 13.11 299 1,198.203 93.02 300 i,1 06.759 118.31 297 1,101. 596 13.. 81 298 i ,203.123 298 1,203.122 0.00 CLOSING lIN£ 299 1,198.203 1,130.509 1,116.163 1,163.512 1,315.292 " 103. 638 1,103.610 1 J 116.163 ---..-...- ..-.---- -- _.. __,.a.__.._.._____...,~..___.. ..____..~ .__~~...___.._ ...... __.~..__....__.~_....~~...._...___ 23. 91 DElTA- 51 07 02.03 R= 50.00 R= 11. 61 C= 13.11 T= - -.............---------........---..--...---..--- --..-- --.....----..--....-- - -.- ----......----... --,. -......--...-- RADIAL BRG OUT:S[ 69 13 33.88 RRDIUS PT P.C. TO P. J. 299 HE is 19 57.13 301 SE 60 28 37.85 282 S[ 1 59 12.00 281 SU 88 00 18. OD 300 HIJ 10 33 39.12 SU 20 56 :32.48 131. 708 0151 TRAU 112,118.129 PR£CISIOH -~...------------- ......-..---....-----..--- AR£R 11615.82 Sf .2667 RCR£S --_....._......-----.,----.._~-------.._-_.~- 281 i ,215.589 13.1 i 301 1,228.261 116.58 282 1, t 70. 816 . 60.00 281 1,11 O. 853 117. 50 300 i ,106. 762 93.02 299 1, 19B. 207 299 4,198.203 0.00 CLOSING LIN£ 1,130.508 1 , 177 . 11 0 1,578.851 1,580.912 1,163.513 1,116.165 1,116.463 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I ( ( ----------------------------------------------------------------------- COORDINATE FILE:WESOAK LENGTH = 504 POINTS; TIME ON FILE: 69 46 44.92 Western Oaks Addition ***** JOB #85235 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ************* COGO ************* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FRO~1 TYPE BEARING DISTANCE TO NORTHING EASTING -----------------------------~-------------------------------------------------- LOT SUMMARY Lo+ J+ B I /L ~ 251 4,427.432 4,489.914 251 NE 18 55 20.60 127.68 271 4,548.212 4,531.319 271 SE 39 øø 43.90 79.66 236 4,486.315 4,581.464 236 SW 22 19 23.0Ø 111.16 258 4,383.486 4,539.242 258 NW 48 18 øø.øø 64.ØØ 182 4,426.060 4 , 491 .458 RADIAL BRG IN: SW 41 42 øø.øø -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DELTA- ø 22 32.38 R= 314.11 A= 2.06 C= 2.06 T= 1 . -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIAL BRG OUT:NE 41 19 27.62 RADIUS PT P.C. TO P.T. 182 NW 48 29 16.19 56 4,191.534 4,282.502 2.Ø6 251 4,427.425 251 4,427.432 Ø.Øl CLOSING LINE 4,489.915 4,489.914 NW 9 36 52.44 384.559 DIST TRAV 59,383.234 PRECISION -----~---------------------------~- AREA 7773.51 SF .1785 ACRES -----------~----~------------------ I I f I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I " I (- ( ----------------------------------------------------------------------- COORDINATE FILE:WESOAK LENGTH = 504 POINTS; TIME ON FILE: 68 11 19.85 Western Oaks Addition ***** JOB #85235 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ************* COGO ************* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FROM TYPE BEARING DISTANCE TO NORTHING EASTING -----------------------------~-------------------------------------------------- LOT SUMMARY Lo+ I [ ß \ lG 4 213 213 NE ø 02 18.ØØ 101.72 212 212 SE 89 57 42.ØØ 80.ØØ 241 241 SW 9 52 33.61 115.81 242 RADIAL BRG IN: SW 17 16 40.49 4,503.903 4,6ØS.623 4,6Ø5.569 4,491.475 4,315.589 4,315.658 4,395.658 4,375.794 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DELTA- 11 13 52.08 R= 314.11 A= 61.57 c= 61.47 T= 30. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIAL BRG OUT:NE 6 02 48.41 RADIUS PT P.C. TO P.T. 242 NW 78 20 15.55 56 4,191.539 4,282.501 61.47 213 4,5Ø3.9Ø2 213 4,5Ø3.9Ø3 ø.øø CLOSING LINE 4,315.590 4,315.589 NW 22 33 Ø7.39 359.102 OIST TRAV 358,543.446 PRECISION ~-~----~-~-----------------~------~ AREA 7564.93 SF .1737 ACR~S ------------~---~--~-~~------------ LOT SUMMARY L,o+ l'-.. R , ,'- 4- 242 4,491.476 4,375.794 242 NE 9 52 33.61 .115.81 241 4,605.57Ø 4,395.657 241 __ ,S E 99 57 43.99 75.29 250 4,6Ø5.520 4,470.947 250 SW 13 53 04.05 144.33 249 4,465.407 4,436.313 RADIAL BRG IN: SW 29 19 10.69 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DELTA- 12 02 30.20 R= 314.11 A= 66.02 c= 65.89 T= 33. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIAL BRG OUT:NE 17 16 4Ø.49 RADIUS PT P.C. TO P.T. 249 NW 66 42 04.41 56 4,191.534 65.89 242 4,491.470 242 4,491.476 0.01 CLOSING LINE 4,282.499 4,375.792 4,375.794 NE 17 04 30.92 401.446 OIST TRAV 66,199.520 PRECISION -----~----------~-~---------------- AREA 8910.79 SF .2046 ACRES - - -- - -- -- -- -- . -- - --- - _. -- --- --- -- -..- -- I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I LOT SUf1t1ARY L 0 + , '3 ß \ 1c 4- 249 4,465.413 4,436.315 249 NE 13 53 04.05 144.33 2SØ 4,SØS.526 4,47Ø.949 25Ø SE 89 57 42.ØØ 8Ø.ØØ 22 4,SØS.473 4,550.949 22 SW 18 55 20.73 188.21 251 4,427.434 4,489.915 RADIAL BR~ IN: SW 41 19 27.62 ' '\ '\.J -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DELTA- 12 øø 16.93 R= 314.11 A= 65.81 C= 65.69 T= 33. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIAL BRG OUT:NE 29 19 10.69 RADIUS PT P.C. TO P.T. 251 NW 54 40 40.84 56 4,191.542 4,282.501 65.69 249 4,465.415 4,436.315 249 4,465.413 4,436.315 0.ØØ CLOSING LINE SW 9 47 15. 14 478.353 OIST TRAV 232,681.943 PRECISION --~----------~--------------------- AREA 11460.38 SF .2631 ACRES -~------~------~--~----~----------- LOT 5 IM~Y /..0+ 14 ß~ (,.. 4- ~51 // \4,427.432 4,489.914 251 ~ 18 55 20.73 128/~1 271/ 4,548.713 4,531.491 271 5 38 41 25;99 pg.94 23~ 4,486.317 4,581.463 236 SW 22 19 2,1.J0 /11.16 2~8 ,383.488 4,539.241 258 NW B 181ø. ø 64.ØØ ¥32 ,426.Ø63. 4,491.456 BRG IN: w 41 4 øø. ø j DELT ---~-;;-;;~;8~:--l//~~;~~~-~:--¡~-----;~~~- :-----~~--;~~~-~:---------~~ RADI ~-~~~-~~~~~;1-~-;;~-~-1------i------------1------1--------------------- RAOI 5 PT //' \ 1 I.'. if 56 4\91 · ~36 4,282.501 P . C. TO P. T . I \ I _ I. 182 NWJ:.f "29 16.1 It 2.0.., 251 4, ,2::;~28 4,489.914 l . I / 2 5 1 4 , 42· I ..4 32 4 , 4 8 9 . 9 1 4 NE, ; 2 43 41.16\ I ø. ~íø CLOSING LINE 385 . 7, 0/9 0 1ST T R A V \, j I ____:. ~~3_~~~:_~~=:~:~~~____ --1--/ ~~;~~~M~~~:~~~;;~~~--ß~~~~¡--:~ \- 258 NE 22 19 23.ØØ 236 NE 89 33 58.ØØ 26Ø SW 22 19 22.96 259 NW 48 18 øø.øø SW 44 18 32.76 403.850 DIST TRAV 63,973.830 PRECISION 258 4,383.491 111.16 236 4,486.320 67.52 260 4,486.831 159.17 259 4,339.59Ø 66.0Ø 258 4,383.495 258 4,383.491 0.01 CLOSING LINE 4,539.240 4,581.462 4,648.980 4,588.523 4,539.245 4,539.240 --~-------------------------------- AREA 8415.69 SF .1932 ACRES ~---~--------~--------------------- l. . I I f I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I ~ I ( ( LOT SUMMARY L of- 28 fš,,¡IG 4- 270 4,564.738 4,675.069 270 SW 18 3Ø 57.71 82 . 16 260 4,486.831 4,648.977 260 SW 89 33 58.ØØ 67.52 236 4,486.320 4,581.459 236 NW 39 øø 43.90 79.66 271 4,548.217 4,531.314 271 NE 68 10 16.70 121.96 272 4,593.566 4,644.530 RADIAL BRG IN: NE 68 10 16.70 -----------------------------~-------------------------------------------------- DELTA- 49 39 19.ØØ R= sø.øø A= 43.33 C= 41.99 T= 23. --.------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RADIAL BRG OUT:SW 18 30 57.70 RADIUS PT P.C. TO P.T. 272 SE 46 39 22.80 40 4,612.157 4,690.945 41.99 270 4,564.746 4,575.ØS6 270 4,564.738 4,675.069 0.Øl CLOSING LINE SE 19 32 36.59 394.632 OIST TRAV 52,269.691 PRECISION -----~-~--------------------------~ AREA 9680.36 SF .2222 ACRES ---------~-----------~----~-------- LOT SUMMARY L¿J f z1 ~J;:; 4 272 4,593.559 4,644.532 272 SW 68 10 16.70 141.96 271 4,548.210 4,531.317 271 NE 18 55 21 . øø 60.53 22 4,605.469 4,55Ø.946 22 NE ø 02 07.64 8Ø.55 238 4,686.019 4,550.996 238 SE 62 1Ø 20.30 1Ø8.25 239 4,635..486 4,646.727 RADIAL BRG IN: SE 62 10 2Ø.3Ø --,~ - - - - -- -- - - - - --- - - - - - - -- - - -"- - - - - - - - - -- - _.- - - -.- -- -- ~- _. -- -."- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - ---- - - -- DELTA- 49 39 23.ØØ R= sø.øø A= 43.33 c= 41.99 T= 23. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIAL BRG OUT:SW 68 10 16.70 _ RADIUS PT P.C. TO P.T. 239 SW 2 59 58.20 40 4,612.145 4,690.945 41.99 272 4,593.554 4,644.530 272 4,593.559 4,644.532 0.01 CLOSING LINE NE 23 28 14.55 414.623 DIST TRAV 77,954.033 PRECISION ----------~------------------------ AREA 8497.39 SF .1951 ACRES --------------~-------------------- LOT SUMMARY /..0 +- ~ 0 (l;, lIt 4 .,...", 1~ "'f?I ~rn 239 1~O"'1:: '"170 4,646.730 4,635.491 II Î'f)í" ~......... .& .....,.....-" -_.- I I (' I I I I I I l.- I I I I I I I it I ¿6·~j ; ,~t:. :0 'U .I... V W . °U '-' _.. ~ .,_.'_'..J. W"- .....J 176 NE 89 :...16 58.0Ø 88 . 49 ~)')~) l' 4,736 .764 4,639.517 ~~'-. qs- 226 NE 89 33 58.ØØ 7 .22 .:)47 4 735.818 4,546.736 , 347 SE 28 31 16.ØØ 85. 13 237 4,662 .020 4,687.385 RADIAL BRG IN= SE 4 05 26.74 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DELTA- 58 04 53.56 R= S0.ØØ A= 50.69 c= 48.54 T= 27. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIAL BRG OUT:NW 52 10 2Ø.30 RADIUS PT P.C. TO P.T. 237 SW 56 52 06.48 4Ø 4,612.147 4,690.951 48.54 239 4,635.488 4,646.734 239 4,635.491 4,646.730 0.01 CLOSING LINE NW 51 04 32.70 389.846 DIST TRAV 75,871.145 PRECISION ---~----~-~---~-------------------- AREA 9Ø99.92 SF .2089 ACRES ---------~--------~---------------- LOT SUMMARY Lof 31 I~l¡¿ 4- 237 4,662.023 4,687.381 237 NW 28 31 16.ØØ 85 . 13 347 4,736.822 4,546.732 347 NE 89 33 58.01 109.33 348 4,737.649 4,756.Ø59 348 SE ø 26 Ø2.ØØ lØØ.ØØ 234 4,637.652 4,756.817 234 SW 89 66 58.03 22.76 17'") 4,637.480 4,734.Ø57 ' ~ RADIAL 8RG IN= SW 59 33 58.ØØ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DELTA- 63 39 24.74 R= sø.øø A= 55.55 C= 52.74 T= 31. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RADIAL BRG OUT=NW 4 05 26.74 RADIUS PT P.C. TO P.T. 172 NW 62 15 44.37 4Ø 4,612.153 4,590.946 52.74 237 4,662.Ø25 237 4,662.023 ø.øø CLOSING LINE 4,687.38Ø 4,687.381 SE 17 58 45.41 372.771 OIST TRAU 137,018.938 PRECISION --~-~---------~~--~~--------------- AREA 7582.73 SF .1741 ACRES ----------------------------------- TIME FOR THIS RUN: COORDINATES STORED ø 05 ØS.48; TOTAL TIME ON FILE: 69 51 SØ.39 , ,: .. . '-. e I I , I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I t' I lOT SUMMARY BLK i lOT 38 221 SE 0 26 02.00 225 SU 89 33 58.00 311 HE 26 10 11. 11 RADIRl BRG IN: HE B 09 33.48 (- 221 100.00 225 109.33 317 84.51 220 4 ~837. 61i 1,737.611 i~736.819 1 J812. 665 4,755.301 ;) 756.059 i ,616. 732 1,681.00i DEL TR- 68 35 35. is R= - - -- --- -------- -- -...- -- --...... - --- - - -- -- -- --.. -.... --- ---.. -...... --- - --- - - - - - ---- -..... -... - - - - -..- 31. 1 0 50. 00 R= 59.86 c= 56.35 T = ... - - -- - -- -- -........ -.... ~ -.. --- --- --..... --......... -........ - - -..... -'-" - --... -- -- -.. ----- - -- ----.. --.. --.. - -... -...... RADIRl BR6 OUT :5£ 60 26 02.00 RRDIUS PI P.c. TOP.L 220 HE 63 51 15. 71 170 HE 89 33 58.00 Sf 68 38 51. 05 37; .109 nIST TRRU 191 ,299. 677 PRECISIDN -- -- --------.,.... -- -----.. ------------- RREA 7625.20 Sf .1751 ACRES --- ------- --...... ----- ---------- ------ LOT 39 220 SU 26 1 0 11. 11 347 SU B9 33 58.00 176 HE 0 02 DB. 00 217 HE 63 55 51.44 RADIAL BRG IN: HE 63 55 51. i4 36 ",862.159 56,35 170 1,837.~8B 20. 71 224 i ,837.645 221 4,837. 6~i 0.00 CLOSING LINE 220 81. 51 317 9~. 71 . 176 57.55 217 105.90 219 i ,81 Z. 665 1,736.818 4 ~ 736.093 i ,793. 6'13 ~,B1ÙI182 î ,691. 101 1,731. 590 4,755.299 4,755.301 1 ,684. 006 4,646. 733 4 ~55t. 026 1 ~551. 062 ;; ]646.1 BS DfLTR- 55 46 17.96 R= - ---- - - ---- ------ - --- ----- --- - - - --... - -...- - -... - - - - - - --- - - - - - -- --- -.... - - -- --- - - - --- -- - -- -- 26.46 50.00 R= is.67 c= 46. 77 T = ----------- --- --- ------------------- -- - -------------- --- ----- - --------------- ------ RRDIRl BR6 DUT:SU B 09 33.48 RRDIUS PI P.C. TO P. T. 219 SE 53 57 17. 51 HE 13 35 26.17 392.340 DISl TRAU 89,863. 835 PRfCI 51 ON ---- - ....-- - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- ---- ----- RRfR 94'16.59 Sf .2169 RCRfS ---------- - - ----------------- --- -- lOT 10 219 217 SU 63 55 51. 44 HE 0 02 08. 00 '? ')., C'r ({, 'M dr r~ 36 1 ~862.151 16,77 220 '1,812.660 220 i ,Bt 2.665 0.00 CLOSING LINE 219 105.90 217 129.62 227 1 n?.,') ')1 0 11810.186 4 ~ 793.648 '1 J 923.268 d 00') HC î ,691.1 01 '1 ) 68'1. 005 4,681.006 1,616.189 '1 ~551. 063 1 ~551. 143 4 C&r ')Ot ( I I , I I I I I I -- II I I I I I I / it I fl.iìUi ilL UÏ\U .1 ¡I- Ji.. \.Jù f... î '1J. JO - ---- ------------------------- -------------- - ---------- --- --- - -- --- - -- -- -- --- ---..- 23. 13 D£l TR- 49 39 23. 00 R= 50. 00 A= i3.33 c= 41.99 T= - ---...--....--- ------ - ------ -- ---------- ----- - ---- -- --- --- - ---- - - .--- - --- -- ---- ------- RAUl RL BRG OUT: SU 63 55 51. 41 RADIUS PT P,C. rop.I. 218 S[ t 14 27.06 tftJ 45 50 00.53 381. 573 OJ ST r RAU 207 )278.657 PR[CISIDN -- - ---- - - -- -.......- ..-.. -.. - -- -- -- -- ----- RR£R 7989. 91 Sf . 1831 RCR[S .. ------ ----...-... ,.......-----.....-..---- ---..- LOT 11 21 e NtJ 66 21 45.56 227 H[ 0 02 08.00 13 H£ 89 58 56.83 222 S[ 26 18 16.15 RRDIRL BRG IN: S[ 11 53 35.00 36 î ~862. 157 11. 99 219 '1 ~B40. 185 219 1,840.186 0.00 CLOSING LINE 218 1 Ole 72 227 65.95 13/' 90. 96 222 87. 19 223 ; ,882.166 4 ~923. 269 i ~ 999.219 1~989.247 1,911. 091 4,691. 101 1,616.191 1,646.189 1,615.280 4,551. 142 1,551.183 1 ,6i2. 113 i ~680. 792 DEL TA- 54 31 10.56 R= - - -... -- - ----- ---- -- - --- - -.. ---..-- --- --- - -... -- -- - - -- -- -- - - ------ --.- --.. - - -----.... - ---- - -... 25. 76 50. 00 R= 17.58 c= 45. 80 r = - -.. -- -........-.. - -- - - -- --....- -- ---- ---.. ---- -... -.. -- ---.... - -.. --........ - - --.. -- - - --- -.. --....... -- - --..... RADIAL BR6 OUT: NfJ 66 24 is. 56 RADIUS PI P.C. TO P. T. 223 SU 50 50 i9.72 Sf 48 57 12.58 391.397 nISI TRRU 46 ,82B. 877 PRfCISIOH ---- ---- -- - -... ----- --.. -.... ------.. -...-- AR[A 9750. DB Sf .2238 RCR£S ------ ----- --... ----- ----.. ----------- 36 1,862.161 45.80 218 4 ,BB2. 171 218 4 J 882. 166 0.01 CLOSING lIH£ ~ 1,691,096 1 ~615. 271 4 ~ 645. 280 - I' '-H {O/W1f'Qj . r I I I I I I Ia I I I I I I I t' I IQ ( ( -........ -- ---.. --- - -.. -.. -~ -~_.... -....-...-......-.. -- --..... --... ....---- ...--....... - ---... -.. -- ----..... COORDINRTE fIL[:UESORK LENGTH = 501 POINTS; TIME ON fILE: 61 10 57.93 Uestern Oaks Addition ***" JOB 185235 ************* C060 ************* --.. -.... -... ----.... ~ - ...... -- --- ---... - - - - -.---.... -- ---..... - - - -- - - -- -.... ---..........,. - ---.. fROM TYPE BEARING ----- - ---.. -- --- -.. - --...... ...--- --..... ---.. ---- -- -............. - --- -....... --..... --.. -........ ----... -...-- EASTIN6 DISTRNCE TO NORTHING -- -_ ___'II __.. _.. _.... _.. _______ __ ______ ___ __.. _.. ___ _.. _.. __.. __.. ___... __.. __ ____.. _.. ____ ____ LOT SUMMARV BLK i LOT 12 223 NU 26 18 16.15 222 HE 89 58 59.00 221 SE 0 26 02. 00 216 SIJ 89 33 58.00 RRDIAl BRG IN: SU 59 33 58.00 223 17911.085 1 )680. 798 87. 19 222 1,989.211 1,612.119 1 07. 00 221 17989.273 1,719. 1 19 101. 67 216 1,881.606 i ,119. 919 15. 71 168 1,887.487 4,731. 21 0 D[lTR- 71 27 33.00 R= --... -~- - -- - -.. - -- - ~- ......----..- ----- ----- ..--.. -.. --- ..-..... -.._~ - --- --.. -----,. --------- -------- 35.97 50.00 A= 62.36 c= 58.10 J:: -- ---- -- - --- - -.. -...-----.... ------- - - ..-..... --.. --- - -- --~----- ------ -... --- -.. ..----- - --- - -- -- RRDIAL BRG aUT:NtJ 11 53 35.00 RADI US PT P. C. TOP. r. 168 HU 66 09 i8.50 Sf 72 25 55.99 373.930 DISI TRAU 102,122.131 PRECISION - -..- - ---.. - ...-- - -........... ---- ---- --- -..--- ARER 7501. 26 Sf . 1722 ACRES ---------------------...------------- 36 1,862. 160 4,691. 099 58.10 223 1 J 911. 086 223 4,911. 085 0.00 CLOSING LINE 1,680. 795 1,680. 798 I · "'., ' . I J I , I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I t" I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 30, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-841, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WESTERN OAKS ADDITION, BLOCK 1 THRU 4, FINAL PLAT, PS 85 - 96, GRID MAP 40 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 Since this proposed plat is contiguous with the proposed "Foster Village Addition", we would recommend that the subdivision name be changed from "Western Oaks Addition" to the "Foster Village Addition" and the lot and block numbers revised accordingly. 2 The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat. 3 The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the Plat. 4 We note that the plans submitted to our office for review are stamped "Review Set, Not for Construction". The plans submitted for review should accurately reflect actual proposed construction. Any deviation from reviewèd and Commission/CouncïT approved construction plans should be noted on "As-built" pl ans and a copy of such as-builts transmitted to our office and the City for updating permanent Publ ic Works records. 5 The full existing right-of-way width on Bursey Road should be noted Oil thé plat. The plat shows what appears to be the centerline of Bursey Road which is located 3D-feet from the existing south right-of-way line or north subdivision line. If this is the case then the existing right-of-way is 60-feet wide. This should be verified by the developer's surveyor. The developer is proposing to dedicate from 8 to 9 additional feet. The total right-of-way width would then be 68 or 69 feet as required by the NRH Thoroughfare Master Plan. If the existing right-of-way width along this proposed subdivision is less than 60-feet then additional right-of-way dedication off the north side (in Keller) will be required. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I· I , I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I ( ( Subdivision Review Letter continued WESTERN OAKS ADDITION 6 We would note that the developer plans to build only half of Bursey Road along the frontage of this development. The existing right-of-way width may be presently insufficient for widening to a full 49-foot BIB pavement width. Technically, the Subdivision Ordinance states that the developer could be required to acquire the additional right-of-way on the opposite side of the street (in Keller) in addition to his own dedication if you so direct. If you choose to waive this provision, then we would suggest that it be covered in the City-Developer agreement to avoid future problems. 7 All front and side building lines should be at least 20 feet for R-3 zoning. Building setback lines should also be shown along Bursey Road. 8 These lots do not appear to have at least the 100 foot average depth required for R-3 zoning: Lots 4, 5, 8, 9 Block 1; Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Block 2; Lots 8, 9, 10, 12, 17, 19, 21, 22 Block 3; Lots 16, 17, 20, 27, 29, 31, 38, 40, 42 Block 4. 9 These lots do not appear to have the 65 foot minimum width, measured at the building line, required for R-3 zoning: Lots 9, 11, 20 Block 3; Lots 12, 15, 30, 39, 41 Block 4. 10 Lot 42 Block 4 seems to be smaller than the 7500 square foot minimum requirement for R-3 zoning. 11 A Utility and Drainage Easement is needed between Lots 7 and 8 Block 1 and continuing across Lot 18 Block 1. The 5-foot Utility Easement along the west of Lots 30, 39, 40, and 41 Block 4 should be widened and changed to a Utility and Drainage Easement. A Drainage Easement is needed between Lots 17 and 18 and between Lots 26 and 27 Block 4. 12 All sanitary sewer services should be moved to the center of each lot and the single water services moved from the lot line to 10 foot from the sanitary sewer services. 13 Any construction in the vicinity of the Lone Star Gas line located on the south side of Bursey Road should be coordinated with Lone Star Gas. The size of the existing gas line crossing the proposed off-site sanitary sewer line in Keller should be noted on the plans. . Is the Keller gas line owned by Lone Star Gas? 14 Relocation of the existing 16-inch water line in Bursey Road as required for construction of the proposed Box Culvert should be coordinated with the North Richland Hills Public Works Department. Tapping Saddles and Tapping Gave Valves should be used on the section of the 16-inch water main being replaced to minimize the length of time which this line will be out of service. Disinfection and testing of the replacement segement should be accomplished before placing in service. This process normally takes about 3 days. December 30, 1985 PS 85 - 96 PAGE 2 I, I r I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I t' I ( ( Subdivision Review Letter continued WESTERN OAKS ADDITION 15 Written permission for off-site channel grading in the City of Keller should be obtained before approval of this development. Also written approval for off-site sanitary sewer construction is required. All easements should be obtained by the developer and furnished to the City of North Richland Hills. 16 Approval of the sanitary sewer metering station proposed should be approved by the Trinity River Authority along with point of service connection to outfall main in Keller. One-hundred (100-yr) year water surface elevation in vicinity of metering station may be required by TRA before approval. The TRA may require that the manhole rim be located above the 100-year water surface elevation. In any event, plans should be submitted to the TRA for review and approval before NRH approval of this development. 17 We would refer you to comments in our review letter dated August 8, 1985, PS 85-57, Preliminary Plans, regarding water prorata and street and draingage escrow considerations. 18 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agre~lIent, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Pol icy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ?!.~~ Ad/III ~ rmf'u ~ ' RWA/ra Enclosures cc: t1r. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development December 30, 1985 PS 85 - 96 PAGE 3 I' I r I I I I I I Ia I I I I I I I t' I (' (- KNOWL TON-ENGLfSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas August 9, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-903, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~IGHLAND OAKS ADDITION, BLOCKS 1-7, PRELIMINARY PLAT, PS 85 - 57, GRID MAP 40 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 Since this proposed plat is contiguous with the "North Richland Estates Addition", we would recommend that the subdivision name be changed from "Highland Oaks Addition" to the "North Richland Estates Addition" and the lot and block numbers revised accordingly. 2 The OWner's ACknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of the final plat. 3 The surveyor's certification should be signed and sealed on the final plat. 4 A small scale vicinity map should be i n c 1 ud ed on the plat showing the general location of the development. Building set back should be shown on the plat. utility easements should be shown on the plat. 5 6 7 Concentrated stormwater discharge from this deve'íopment will be directed into a proposed culvert across Bursey Road into Keller. The developer should coordinate this proposed drainage system with the City of Keller and property owners in Keller äffected by the increased discharge created by this proposed development. Letters of permission from downstream property owners should be obtained for the concentrated discharge. The developers engineer has provided calculations which indicate that the downstream channel located within Keller has sufficient capacity to handle at least the la-year storm as required by the North Richland Hills Ordinance. We would suggest that compliance with Keller requirements be investigated. t l r I I ¡ ¡ 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I' (( Subdivision Review Letter continued I f8 I I I I I I -- I I 13 I 'I I I 15 I t' I (( HIGHLAND OAKS ADDITION · · · j I The developer is proposing to sewer this development to an off-site outfall main in the City of Keller. This connection should be approved by both the Keller and North Richland Hills City Councils. The easements for the off-site sanitary sewer should be executed and sent to the city. If the plan to sewer this development into Keller is not approved, then the developer should submit plans for the alternate lift station and force main design. 9 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of an existing 16-inch water line in Bursey Road. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot for one-half of an equivalent 8-inch line for a total length of 938.96 feet. 10 The devloper should also be required to pay his prorata share of the existing 6-inch water line in Douglas Lane. We would estimate prorata at $4.00 per linear foot for one half of this line for a total length of 873.26 feet. 11 The developer should escrow his prorata share of future street and drainage improvements on Bursey Road and Douglas Lane. 12 The new Thoroughfare Plan proposes Bursey Road to be designated as a C4U Collector with a minimum 68-foot right-of-way width and a 49-foot BIB width. This plat has dedicated 5-feet for a total of 65-foot right-of-way. Technically, the Subdivision Ordinance states that the developer could be required to acquire the additional right-of-way on the opposite side of the street in addition to his own dedication if you so direct. If you choose to waive this provision, then we would suggest that it be covered in the City-Developer agreement to avoid future problems. The new Thoroughfare Plan shows the future alignment of Meadowview Terrace, a C2U Collector with a minimum 60-foot right-of-way, to pass through this development. It appears that the proposed alignment is located in the general vicinity of Highland Oaks Drive. We would recommend that the alignment of Meadowview Terrace be coordinated with the developers south of this subdivision (Southland Financial Services, etal) and that Highland Oaks Drive be renamed Headowview Terrace and the right-of-way width be changed to a 60-foot width. 14 The proposed 6-inch water line in 'Roll ing Ridge Drive should be changed to an 8-inch water line. The section of the proposed 6-inch water line in Old Oak Drive between Highland Oaks and Douglas Lane should be change to an 8-inch line also. As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning August 9, 1985 PS 85 - 57 2 PAGE I' · I r I I I I I I ~ I 'I I I I I I ~ I {~ Subdivision Review Letter continued r- f, ( HIGHLAND OAKS ADDITION Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the CitY-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. if you < RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development August 9, 1985 PS 85 - 57 3 PAGE I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: Subject: Request of Crow-Nowlin Association HI for Replat of Lot 2R, Block 4 University Plaza Addition 2/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PS 85-97 This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lot 2R, Block 4, University Plaza Addition. The subject property is the office complex site under construction on the northeast corner of Weyland Drive and Airport Freeway. The project under construction is the Nowlin Mortgage Company Office Tower. The purpose for the proposed replat is to dedicate the necessary utility easements and fire lanes to support the building under way on the site. All of the Engineer's comments are satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Replat Application PS 85-97 requesting approval of Lot 2R, Block 4, University Plaza Addition as submitted. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available f(~~ I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Pace 1 of 1 1-1 I..' , J , I , , I I I I I . I I , , , I , I I . , I \ \ , , AG \ F:F?~ I I · I · , \ ~V~ ,-J..C-I ,#~--1 I F:~ ~I ' ,,' 1./ /'--..........__,' II, R-7 - I I ,! I I , I I , , , \ , , \ , " , I-I AG u ÙlfJ v.~ c.Þ- I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I {' I Page 3 P & Z Minutes January 23, 1986 ( r / / /. /~ / / .;~. / /PS 85-96 L APPROVED 2. PS 85-94 Request of James B. & Donna L. Hamm for replat of Lots 4RA, 4RB, 6 & 7, Block 3, Industrial Park Additio PS 85-94 APPROVED Mr. Hallford made the motion approve PS 85-94. This seconded by Ms. Flippo carried 5-0. 3. PS 85-96 Request of Fenimo -Frank, Inc. for final plat stern Oaks Addition. Vice Chai n Wood called for the represen tive of this request to pleas come forward. J kie Fluitt with Stembridge and ssociates came forward. Vice Chairman Wood asked if the issue of the Lone Star Gas easement had been resolved. Mr. Fluitt said it had not been resolved, but they hope to get it resolved within the next few days. Vice Chairman Wood said it would have to be resolved before going to the City Council with this plat. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PS 85-96 subject to getting the Lone Star Gas easement resolved. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and t!1e '~~lQtion, c,0rrted 5.....0 ~ 4. .......-.-.... ~---....~"'~¢-......-....-.......,.. ,~'4.~...,'-.-. PS 85-97 Request of Crow-Nowlin Associates, #1 for replat of Lot 2R, Block 4, University Plaza Addition. PS 85-97 APPROVED Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PS 85-97. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. 5. PS 85-99 Request o l- Ie I I I I I I I II I I I 'I I I I r I ( ( KNOWl TON-E NClISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas 24, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-865, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS UNIVERSITY PLAZA ADDITION, LOT 2R, BLOCK 4, REPLA T, PS 85 - 97, GRID MAP 125 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 All suggested additions and corrections have been made in accordance with our letter dated December 31, 1985, and we have no further objections to this proposed development. Please call if you have any questions. UJ,~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I l- I I I I I I I It I I I I I I I r I J- . ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas January 24, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-865, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS UNIVERSITY PLAZA, LOT 2R BLOCK 4, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, PS83 - 123, GRID MAP 125 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 All suggested additions and corrections have been made in accordance with our letter dated November 6, 1985, and we have no further objections to this proposed development. 2 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. f};¡~,W. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E& RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 .. . ... ~-- ". -----, I I {' DALLAS I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I ~EEDHA1\1 WRIGHT LiSKEY ENGINEERS INCo ARLINGTON January 9, 1 986 Job No. 85-408-04 Ms. Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland Hills 730 1 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-865, City of North Richland Hills University Plaza AdditiŒ1, Lot 2R, Block 4 Replat & Construction Plans PS 85-97 & ~ 83-123, GRID MAP 125 Dear Ms. Calvert: We have received review COmments from Knowlton - English _ Flowers, Inc. regarding the construction plans and replat for the referenced project. We offer the following reply: In regards to the review Comments for the construction plans (KEF letter dated Nov. 6, 1 985): - Paragraph 1 Commented on the fire hydrant spacing. This was corrected and resubmitted 1D KEF. They approved the œw spacing per their letter of January 3, 1 986. - Paragraph 2 Commented on necessary easements. All onsite easements are being dedicated per the refererced replat. One offsite easement is required. This easement has been prepared (see copy enclosed) am is currently being executed. This executed document wiU be for v.a.rded as soon as the execution is Complete. - Owner/Developer is aware of their responsibilities outlined in Paragraph 3. In regards to the review COmments for the replat (KEF letter dated Dee, 31, 1 985): - Owner's Acknowledgement am Dedication Statement am the Notary Cer tification has been fully executed per Paragraph 1. - Surveyors Cer1i ficate (seal, signature am notary cer1i fication) has been executed per Paragraph 2. - All utility companies are being notified of the proposed replat by your office a nd requested in wri ting 1D no tify the City of their concurrence per Para graph 3. - Paragraph 4 has been resolved per KEF letter dated January 3, 1986. - 0 wner /Developer is a v.a. re of their responsibili ties outlined in Paragraph 5. 4144 N. CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 300, LB-30 / DALLAS TEXAS 75204 / (214) 828-0880 1201 N. WATSON ROAD, SUITE 205 / ARLINGTON TEXAS 76006 / METRO 640-7848 .¡Þ I I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I ( ( January 9, 1986 Page Two Enclosed are 9 blue-line copies of the fully executed replat for the referenced project to be used for Planning and Zoning review. I will wait to hear from you regarding the date and time of the P&Z Agenda to which we are assigned. If you require any additional information or have any questions or comments, pi ease do not hesitate to call me. S incereJ y, md~ MAP:kc Mak A. Pacheco Enclosures cc: Richard A Jbin Richard Royston Don Smith Lennie Sullivan Donna Laski Ph il Greene I ~ I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I r I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NClISH-F LOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas January 3, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-865, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS UNIVERSITY PLAZA ADDITION, LOT 2R, BLOCK 4, REPLA T, PS 85 - 97, GRID MAP 125 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 Please see our letter dated December 31, 1985, PS 85-97, paragraph 3. We have discovered later construction plans showing the deletion of the fire hydrant on the north line of Lot 2R Block 4 and the addition of a fire hydrant at the northeast corner of Lot 6 Block 4. The fire hydrant coverage of 300-feet radius required for commercial zoning and easements have been provided. Please call if you have any questions. &W-()J, ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works t'i1r c: Ri chard Rays ton, 0 i r-ec tor of D(~ve -, f., ~!mf~ nt 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I ,þ) , .' . -\' -) l- I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I r I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGlISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 31, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-865, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS UNIVERSITY PLAZA ADDITION, LOT 2R, BLOCK 4, REPLA T , PS 85 - 97, GRID MAP 125 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat. 2 A surveyor's seal and signature should be affixed to the plat. 3 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 4 If a fire hydrant on the north line of Lot 2R Block 4 is to be installed and connected to the existing 8-inch water line on Lot 3 Block 4 to the north of this lot, an easement from the 8-inch water line across Lot 3 Block 4 to the fire hydrant will be needed. Perhaps this fire hydrant has been deleted from the construction plans and a fire hydrant has been added to the northeast corner of Lot 6 Block 4. We would request that the latest construction plans for this development be submitted for our rev i ew. 5 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ord"inance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I '- I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I r I ..1- ( Subdivision Review Letter continued UNIVERSITY PLAZA ADDITION 1JdaJ- !J) RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. ( RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development December 31, 1985 PS 85 - 97 PAGE 2 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas December 10, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-865, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS UNIVERSITY PLAZA, LOT 2R, BLOCK 4, REVISED CONST. PLANS, PS 83 - 123, GRID MAP 125 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 We understand that easements for fire hydrants are provided in the revised plat for this development as requested in our review letter dated November 6, 1985. 2 Again, as a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he ;s responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Plea~a~l.,s al"l, if Y, ou have a~~:tion~. ICMtW-U/, (ßú~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 .,.,. .. tJr.., I-~ '- I I I I I I I -- I I !I I I I I r I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas November 6, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-865, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS UNIVERSITY PLAZA, LOT 2R BLOCK 4, CONSIRUCIION PLANS, PS 83 - 123, GRID MAP 125 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 We would note that adequate fire hydrant coverage protection has not been provided for this lot based on the 300 foot radius requirement for commercial zoning. We would suggest the fire hydrant on the east be moved to the north and the fire hydrant on the south be moved west in order to cover the whole lot. 2 If the easements for the fire hydrants have not been sent to the city, the developer should be reminded to furnish executed copies of these easements to the City. 3 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Pleas e ca l'Î if P.E. R~JA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 "...;¡.~ ........~ .:"'"...... .'~~ . -, - ..--. .... . !.,~..~:. ¡~;.' : ".:~,.,..;,..,............. .~jr:;;,,'.~--~ ..... '-~ I .I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I {' I '. .. -, . ~ o KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas July 23, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-865, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS UNIVERSITY PLAZA, LOT 2R BLOCK 4, WATER PLANS, PS 83 - 123, GRID MAP 125 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The fire hydrant coverage of entire lot, based on 300-foot radius requirement, should be shown. 2 The proposed fire hydrants are not located in easements. The owner should prepare and execute easements for the fire hydrants and transmit them to the city. 3 The 10-inch valve noted at Sta. 6+53.5 is not shown on the plans. The proposed location of this 10-inch valve should be shown on the drawing. 4 We would refer you to our letter dated November 9, 1983, PS83-123, paragraph number 4, regarding notification of the State Highway Department to obtain permission for a~ construction within the Airport Freeway right-of-way. ' 5 All on-site sanitary sewer facil ities should be privately owned and maintained and so noted on the plans. 6 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the CitY-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METROj267-3367 .',C; ~....>. ;....-.Þ-~",....~.,.. :..."'........."'..:. I <*' '- I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I f I . ,. '¡ .... (t o Subdivision Review Letter continued RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development July 23, 1985 PS 85 - 123 UNIVERSITY PLAZA PAGE 2 I ~' I I I I I I I . I I I 'I I I I (' M:.. .'. . -/'. 'I KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSUL TINC ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas November 9, 1983 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-865, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS UNIVERSITY PLAZA ADDN., LOTS 2R and 6, BLOCK 4, REPLAT, PS 83-123, GRID 125 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. A metes and bounds description including bearings and distances of the ARCa Pipe Line easement should be noted on the plat, along with the recorded Volume and Page. 2. The acreage of lot 2-R and 6 each should be noted on the plat. 3. All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 4. Written permission should be obtained from the State Highway Department for any proposed construction within the Airport Freeway right-of-way along the frontage of this development. Should you have any questions concerning the review of this subdivision, please not hesitate to call. -:Þ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Greg Wheeler, Engineering Technician 550 FIRST STATE BANK BLDG.. BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 ....~~-~~~~~.~;... .. ,.. "'~-å.J&......'... '..~';'~.'-_"_. . , . -. . . ,~-.. ..'...'.¿~. _9. - ...... ....<.... .' ~ ':-. h'~'~~"", ¡;..-'1·'.....~h; ~'é' .-.;.....". _.~ ;.........~~..."""... .' ... ~_ .. I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: Council Meeting Date: 2/10/86 Agenda Number: SO 86- 1 SUbject: Request of Richland Medical Center for Variance to Section 4.1 of the Sign Ordinance at 3700 Rufe Snow Dr. P. D. Abbott representing the Richland Medical Center has requested that the City Council consider the granting of a variance to the Sign Ordinance for the Medical Center located on the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Grapevine Highway. The applicants have been in the process of renovating the existing structures on the site and propose to provide signage for the three buildings. The Sign Ordinance dictates that a single site be allocated one ground sign per Section 4.1(b) of the Ordinance with the provision that large developments (i.e. Shopping Centers, and etc.) with extensive frontage on two or more streets may be approved for additional signs by the City Council. The applicants propose that their site meets these provisions since the site has a total of 1255 linear frontage on Rufe Snow Drive, Grapevine Highway, and Flory Street. The applicants propose to construct a total of three signs, (1) A triangular shaped sign located at the intersection of Rufe Snow and Grapevine Highway having a total of 126 square feet in the three faces and a height of 13 feet. (2) A single face sign located on the corner of Flory Street and Grapevine Highway having a total sign area of 42 square feet and a height of eight feet. (3) A single faced sign facing Rufe Snow Drive in front of the main building having a total sign area of 18 square feet and a height of six feet. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should make a determination as to the applicants eligibility under the provisions of Section 4.1(b) of the Sign Ordinance and the advisability of allowing three signs on the subject site. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Op ing Budget er Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~J~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Paae 1 of 1 I I Ie .,~'$'! i~*~i;~ '.. ,} , I I Riclùand Medical Center Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates I I I I I D. Alan Johns, MD* R. D. Banington, MD* P. D. Abbott, MD* Ie I I I I I I I t' 3700 Rufe Snow Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 (817) 284-1152 1325 Pennsylvania Avenue Fort \Vortb, Texas 76104 (817) 332-7733 : /: : February 4, 1986 City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Dear Sirs: We request your permission to install additional ground signs at the Richland Medical Center. The center is bound on three sides by Rufe Snow Drive, Grapevine Highway and Flory Street. The frontage on these three major circulation arteries is approximately 1,255 linear feet. In compliance with Sign Ordinance #1001 Article 4, we request additional signs be allowed as indicated. These signs are required to identify the center and to direct patients to the appropriate building within the center, thereby reducing traffic congestion around the site. We would appreciate being placed on the City Council's agenda at the earliest possible date. Your positive action on this matter is greatly appreciated. Very Truly Yours, P. D. Abbott, M.D. I *Fellow, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology *Diplomate, American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology ~ I ·~~¡i,{ì~·:¡··.·.:~· ~(;~ ;:.,:~";'~;;;; ~.. ~ : '~i ' I Ie ~ )~ ~~.~~.;.:: ;;~' ~ ': ) " ' ~~F-';~ ·~:~·r~'· ,?: . ~::~:)1~,i:}'. 4 ;...... . ~ . , I I .,,-.; ''',''. .~. ~'! ~.~: . -', . - ),. . . ,0. ~ I I ···:·,,·f:\.~'·.~.:·.. ' (Ki!'¡ i~: . · ,',.~'~ ;:,:: !'" ::: . )~'¡i"?;;·~t/ 7;,'i, I . ;, I ';-·~:~i:.": __, <:::~'~:~~J:~~: " , . .~.~ '~.:' ~ ~,.. ':. .. . .... ~ - .. ....... ~~ ..;....;..... ; . : :~. ,~, ~ " " K --. \ ~ .: ' ~ ~..... ,., ":'; ~ I ..i~~¡:J1~!~ :.'{ '. . .:.i '-'. , , I ." .. . -:'?:-~y. ::~;i ~r;: ;\}. ! ., . ::if~i:;H.:~;,,;i I ,'" ;I;;f;}1'~ :i;.'f;~· r·· ¡ ::¡ i::' .!~:~:,:~i j:, 'i,~ .;';i;,! I I " ~' I I I CUSTOMER APPROVAL '.~ ,.. ..1 DATE " . : ì ..' "I. . .. , . . ,..i. . . , . -:-...... , >:::·m,~;'~ ,;.. ;: t ;:: U~'~~·~· ,: G -CJ ,.r.; ,,. , " , , ':. . , .. . ; -.j . ~'~._-.:"~..~ -~-.:",:)~:kr;·~ _' =r£Z:~L7.N.~,'~ . I: . , , I , ' -.------.-, -- . .; ~.. I , . r-. ---4!::º~0' ~ . .,.....:~.:~.: . . \ . ". ..;..::. .. ." '''''. : I "..: t ~ 1 ."". J I' ,.......' . .. ~'. '.:' - : . . ~. , . , 4' B'I, .... .....-- .---..-.-..-. . '"·r . . 00 [j0C] JEll, D·· ,:. .: 0: :,'. ;:)Ihill~ i'. .~;i¡':~~:\:'-·{."~J.'~·©l'" .';: . '.'.' , ; CC· i~O: M' . ..W· . .!Q '~;:¡;æill' ...~. .' .. '.-'. ',.·..Ii....,. " '. ®' O· ·Ct'~ . ·C· . ,.,. ~ -. ~ ,r,~1 ¡,.,,,. '"I. .': .. .... .. ,. rr.. . . ... ,. . ®Ìffi1ëêéJf :. .' ~:... ." t··,· . .. - "~, ~ .'. . i.1 f~ ~.:'.' j:~: I ~ . . . '.~ ~ . I. ..' , . . " i . . '~~I"· 'I "í). ." , . . /.';) . ,,:,f..-.":i. :', '.:-; ~ ~.' . .'! '" ·Yf/r'",: ~':: i'· '..f . I . ":'i~:.:~·,;i.~~.; ~...;' . -¡; "·\':~~>~-:;":.~'~~~.i~ ~¡ ~,'~ :;;.~ ~,"~ ',; .~,~','-~,~; . ::i'.~: ··;:I.~\·:,.';! ". . .. . .,·~·f~fr¡r;~I ,':~r':-~j~E~::'?& :' -¡,~;~';.~';," ..~" . .l;'I; \~~$?~:, . .; . .- ~':~'!S, '¡,'" 1-,.. , f~f.~"?:;~~f· "~'f:'¡. :..a... .... , ~" ',~~ ~ . t; , ~ ~ . ",' . .·r~ ,. 1 . : fV~·;. . , . ' - . .,....;:~:o:-,~W;. ~-.. _. ~. ~-.~~...'. '.. ~.- .,J . ."'" .;. ':-::1 -e;:;=:-....""~~. '~;"'!~~.. - "'~""'T3"'" ·~"'ÿ¡..Ñ· ~ ...,..... "'" 1-"':' ;:\ ::;¡!'!!.===~~ -=-:-;!r.. ,': ~ nN T v: EW E: ¡~ ; ,', , . : : ..¡ . . :"..':,'~!" .~,.t,'~,','...~1.'¡'..;.'.'~._"...I:',....\,.,.,.··._~;·_'.., ,t. .... . - ., -~;~.:: Lt! /; .; _ '-, 7f.'oNE~~~AI: :#3J~ D/tp(ïrð'RõNZ.6 ALVGo80NO .., .0' ...' :;.·;~~:}iN~;,l.~~~,· BA~RGRÕUJ:Y12 ""'-7:.0 ee ROU7'éJ:h.c.)tll' L.¡j~ÕAN~ê.oP~ I'" . . . ~~¡;;-:B~~~~~-ltl/t¥-ll¡i~ ry7Jö-;¿ft/,': '.,~y ;;' :,~.'.1',L.,. ::;.'~..: ~~.'..;.~,.. ....¡.'_¡.:',:,..:.~..;......~_',~.;..:::,'.~:.'",:",~~\"1..:.,',. :..:.~.'.:,~.:-.:,.:.'.:,";'..~ : -etL.-SLJf.f:f3 T # '. ~ ".,:.' ',:;_ :' . . .., ¡'" ' .. . :;'.:< :. . .~... " _'. " _ . .. .':~. .. .. ·,..·.\~\tj~ . OK ð~~~'TAL 1';/Lil:.Jr+ RP.T/fINFR~_", ;3!œ~v-T~~~'.~~' f,~ .. '1: j' t· . . '.t. ~ .,'o~ , : :'i: ::~,.:~.. :' ·!t. " .,... ,; ,.. .I COPY Sill CUSTOMER: RIt::HLANl? Mel?/c::A-L. Cé}.)7ëR..·. -. ~~~.. ,; ':. (. ~< 't;; ':: '~;.' DATi: '/'::6' -86~.o. ;qf?;M~ii~:;: I TREA TM9fT lTR, IKG. Il.I.UMWA noN L Tft. 8KG. M.A. l TR. IKG, I. '-THIS IS AN ORIGINAl UNPU8USHED DRAWtNG/DESIGH SUBMmm FOR YOUR PERSONAL USE IN CONNECTION WIT1i A PROJECT BEJNG PlANNED , FOR YOU IY FORD SIGN MFG. COMPANY AND .5 NOT TO 8E COPtED OR . EXHISlTED IN þNY FASHtON WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION...}:,'!.,....' _ Slnee 1832 I I I I I I I " :'~';' . ., '.. '. ..:¡ .~.:;;~...~~.... :;. . I . ..,". t, ~r >~,~~~f~? ';~'" , ..: ' ':~:·'.·'IX I~:~:;' 'f\; ::i\~~' :if~.~I if~~¡.i· I .. ' I I I I , . I I ~ I'~ I.. I I.~ .: CUSTOMER ' ..J APPROVAL ~ DATE COPY I IIIIW ;" < ~", ! '. ! . ~ i f ¡ , J I j " 1 """ J ~\Ù -' ...{) . ; SIZE COlOR LTR. ISKG. ~~ L ;;~'.\~ -~~'~ . I~~' " , ~ . ~. .... ~-_._-- -~ ~~~-:=-~; ~ - ~ ~----- -- ~.~ - ----6Y:.~ -_ _ -t-,.- . t' ? ~ :, ~'~, ,\.... 1\,' \~. ~.~ ,~.\, \~; <, II~ I~ 03: ~~lO~ (5) D f'. en MW u. :::3 a: * , " 4'" .'. MA'RRIAl l TR. 8KO. TREA TMENT lTR. 81(G. -Q.¡ -;J , i " , " i.' . ....~~ f'~"" .., '..~'. ,.,.....~. :'. .. - "rl" '~ , . ,. ".' , \\\ ~ .. N~, t' . ~ ',I CV "', i~f\ ~. r(\ (: . ) ~\- '~ 'ò' , ' ~\: ~ ~ , _", 1&.::,1, \o\.~ "5¡ " ~N , - " ~, ~ \1' ~.~ ' ~r í~ 41.:¡ ...', ~ ~ ~, l\ ~ ~ \.~ ' ~ ~~ -\I.) -_. ~-~~---:--:, .. .;:- ..,--t- o' . 'f. . , ~ 1!- '& .~ ..,.. ~ or"" ~ IlLUMINA T10H l TR. SKG. n¡ ',~ 'I f.: , ! \" $I (' MA l TR. ISKG. I~ Since 1832 .~. t --~ . ~ . ---..--- , ;'. ~ , ,. t- ' ¡. I.' r " ¡ . ( ",:' \J ,~ ~ ~~ ~' ",' \\ ~I ,~~ ~ ~. '"'-! ... \ \f\ "t ~' U, W t.j ~ ~~~ 0, ~ ~ r: ~ ~: t~ ~ \f\ \~^~t '!J ' ''J \ ~.% ~ ":'k' ~ " .~ ^'- ~ ~ \\\ \-1\ \1) \,s ~, ~ " . ,; ~ I ~ U\ .~ 'C\ ..,: iol \ ~ ,'\ ,~\ ~ \K C'J\ ~~~ ,,~~ . ~\ .. "l t.., ~ \,;\ ".: "1\ ~: \'\ ~ ~ ~ "\ ~\ -'^ ),. ~ ~ ì' l\ \1 tl ~ '~ \~ ~~ ~·t: ..~ ~), ," ~ £\ "\\\ ~~~ ~ è) u,\ \~\ ¡~ ~~ \-J ~ \ . ~kl) ...:... ,. r~' · '\,~: ~ u\ tV. ~.,~ I" ~~ ','. " \t \X \ ..' j ~ ;~.. :1'. ' , , , ' ,F: ' .'. :¡, I' , . . ...... ,', 0', "' þ'.. ,,~ iþ¡' ~ ~,. ~. ~ '- ... " .......... ~ ~ '.\ . ' ~ II :. 1 .~; '.., " .. t:.." .-....... .~:. . .- ':' :.. ¡.. ... ~ ~~.,~ ". " ~;~~":~;;·~?}r,· :' ~:~, ¡")')"',~' ~i~.~ # '/ :-- ,. . ¡ t . .;~~.'~ ::",~~'" ;~ :;'~.'..:. .~' . ~ì ' '.':' (, ;," . :. ~~~ -' 'L~' :7~'~ _ '~ :'; ~~:;' .'..~' ~. ~ ';~E ;:2::!~:~' ,~. ..... ~.. ADDRESS: CITY: , , .. CUSTOMER: t:~/~ µ t ;tIJ- ~.I ¡:::> ),1./3 V; I'.'A L ~E'^I /E-.R-.. DATE: /[2_ 9_g~w.o. ',~",: t:-~- - THIS IS AN ORIGINAl UNPUBLISHED DRAWING/DESIGN SUBMrTTED FOR YOUR PERSONAl USE IN CONNECT'ON W1TH A PROJECT BEING Pt.ANNED FOR YOU BY FORD SIGN MFG. COMPANY AND IS NOT TO BE COPIED OR EXHIBITED IN ANY FASHION WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION. I· , . i· ~.~: j I ·1 I . '.' ~ .:.. ~ .. :-- Oi, . "" I ..~',,'~ ~\D~ . '::: .:~ ~ t , ". ',' L f- Ie':":'::: r'~' I ";,~j~:', I , 'J ~~ ~Tr ,'~ I r~ , .~ ¡'; ;¡ ~ 'V " I ,t \0 I I I CUSTOMER APPROVAL , DATE COpy, Ill! COCOA LTR. SK . I --- I - I I I I I .., ~' " '..-.----. ---.-...----. =-P - ._____ +.----..- . 6!Otl ':d'T, ." , j ,; I,d I " ......-...---.... ... +- ~~ 0" ""-1 ¡' ! ~.", . -. . .-.. - --- ....--.--..-. -------- ----...- -- ---- -.--------...-.-... /' -...., { .* ~ I I .t. 00 m~Ibill@1Dlcdl "M®cdillcawJl : CCcemrlcæIl . ,'l/O, . ~~ -~~ '; . /. - .. 1. I I~ ' · \ u/ oj ~ .> ij~'O :. . , -:.-- ..~~ @' : . . , // , \,//" ::i(' ~ ~ TOP vi &- ,~/ é Le. vA 7iQ~ 1- .. ." , .. . . : ~,!.'. , " : ~ ') :::rRL.Jl.(A//? L/^IE FOp.. ~!.6!ift.é' FA-c.ED ë:;/á1...i _ . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - -..- -... - - - - - - - - - - - --.. -- - . ; ';( f}~ I'! , ~ 11 I~ t. j, iI~ r * C),"/e ...,..~¡; E '.~:/,ÞE/:> ~/~';"',I': IJ.~,~ J-;;AI?::.k.,. ~R..J....",A '?-¿; ,A.!-If;:1.:./P0I-.J ~eAcr~:~:rRDU.NC:::>$'. TV /3ç Rv¿t" ïE¡;, - C'll.T J-<.)4=J ,~.'!.C::> _CC!PY.,. . A r~.. ~;I.J4...,).'~/^/ K<:.~p µ(:¡-µ.r ..!;~\Y./ .. .~H./I . , JJ2/4 b ':vof?í ?;ç~ ~./I;;'Y - (?O~ e¿,¿'~$ ,,;':, . '.fiÇ?,J.I-~\(/IV·~~.7~&r.IJI), t 1/5. 1?1?J,;)¡vZ-~· ··;~b·T·/~.T;A-J, FILl-ER- +¡-:ZE7;z../AI!E£ AN9 t.-7ff£·~ U¡;;-rnL 113.44£ ' :' . . . , . I I V ~~¿¿: 1::- I··~? . · t· . ,·t ;. 'O~ . : · ~~:~~'''';::,'\ f: . . .. - o' t·_"..", :. .~::. . ,.. . I. .. ~.... I '. .'." f . ,., ,&¡" ':'3:::';~~;f:;: '9Þ-E£T .t::</(. o ¡' A,AA TtAW" l TR. BKG. TREATMENT L TW. BKG. IlLUMWA110H M.A. l TA. BKa. L T1\. aKO. CUSTOMER: I(>;(:~µ.( ft.-tt Ie:> ¡V1¿1'À~ I Cc A./TE ~ ~~ESS: DA Tf: œ J7-SS'" W.O. "': !i f: ",:'. I, 'THIS rs AN ORIGINAl UNPUBUSHED DRAWING/DEStGN SU8MrTTEO FOR YOUR PERSONAL USE IN CONNECTION WITH A PROJECT BEING PlANNED FOR YOU 8Y FORO SIGN MFG. COMPANY AND IS NOT TO BE COPIED OR EXHIBITED IN ~y FASHION WITHOUT ,PAJOR PERMISSION. : Since 1132 I . ~ I .-¡ · r-I .~ I ~n ~g I ~ I' I I I ~ .t:: " I :: .\ ~ ile~ f' q~ t /, f ' 11 ,:0 ~õ . :J: : ,~ ,~cn' -I »:-. ~ z:-f 'clm, ! j: ' ! !~c· > :3:'ml z·m < :C'm :Õ:~ ,»,;0 In ,,\J' I . : 3: ~o m mZ Iz -f I ¡ t L. . --f. . I m ¡:x:J , ~ .~ ~ 1\ , i : ! i . . . . . .' I " . ~ì z: ~~ I(i ;¡. ¡ . ~. ~-tJ # '>t.ç.~ . ~+ 'r ./ ./ I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Legal Subject: Propo~ed Federal Tax Reforms, Resolution No. 86-5 - Council Meeting Date: 2/10/86 Agenda Number: GN 86-12 Resolution No. 86-5 covers the matters discussed at the last Pre-Council Meeting. The areas of discussion by Mr. Mclnroe are the six objections set out in Section 2 of this resolution. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 86-5 I Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other N/A Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡fly Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM fJ~~N7 City Manager . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lars nlutinn N' 86-5 .,0. Q!ity of Nort4 Bic41anà Eills WHEREAS, the citizens of this City would be adversely affected by the passage of H.R. 3838, now pending before the U.S. Congress; and WHEREAS, the City Council feels that certain portions of this proposed legislation constitute an unfair, indirect tax by the Federal Government on local governments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. This City Council does hereby go on record in opposition to all portions of H.R. 3838 which seek to impose additional restrictions upon local governments in the issuance of municipal bonds. 2. The following portions of H.R. 3838 are found to be most objectionable: a. Any attempt to take away tax exempt status from a bond, after its sale to the public, because of the action of a local government which fails to comply with federal regulations. b. The requirement that five percent of the "net proceeds" must be spent within thirty"days and the requirement that all "net proceeds" must be spent within three years. (Section 701 of H.R. 3838). c. The requirement that local governments be required to .rebate "positive arbitrage". (Section 701 of H.R. 3838) d. The portion treating certain municipal functions as "nonessential" and subjecting issues to state volume caps. (Section 701 of H.R. 3838 amending Section 141s(a) of the Internal Revenue Code) e. The temporary period restrictions. (Section 701 of H.R. 3838 amending 147 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code) f. The proposed retroactive effective date of January 1, 1986. (Section 703 (a) (i) of H.R. 3838) (Rather than being retroactive, this type of legislation should provide for an effective date at least two years in the future.) I I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I , I Resolution No. 86-5 Page 2 3. The City Council points out that the provisions of this bill dealing with restrictions on municipal funding will greatly increase the cost of local government and will cause great inconvenience to local governments in record keeping and reporting. 4. The City Council directs that the City Secretary forward a copy of this resolution to both U.S. Senators from Texas and the U.S. Congressman from this district. PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day of February, 1986. Dan Echols, Mayor CITY COUNCIL: Marie Hinkle, Place 1 Dick Fisher, Place 5 Jim Kenna, Place 2 Jim Ramsey, Place 6 Richard Davis, Place 3 Harold Newman, Place 7 Virginia Moody, Place 4 ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary I,~' I Department: Subject: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Engineering Public Hearing - Community Development Block Crant Funds Council Meeting Date: 2/10/86 I I Agenda Number: GN 86-13 I The purpose of this Public Hearing is to receive citizen input regarding needs of our low to moderate income neighborhoods. The Housing & Community Development Block Grant Program of Tarrant County is now in its 12th year. Funds from this program have been used in the past for channel improvements on Mackey Creek from Onyx Drive South to Harmonson Road. Other eligible CDBG activities which may be considered by HUD for federal funding include water and sewer system improvements, street improvements, sidewalk and wheelchair ramp construction, parks and recreational facilities development, fire station construction and housing rehabilitation. I All citizens, groups and organizations of our City are welcome to participate and be represented in the formulation of the 12th year plan. This Public Hearing is open for public advice, comments, complaints, questions or presentations of alternative proposals. The public may present their views in writing by obtaining a questionnaire from the City Secretary, complete it and return it to her office. The proposed projects must be submitted to the County by February 15, 1986. I I Recommendation: The Staff will present their project recommendation on 2/10/86. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡J~tI- Department Head Signature . Finance Director I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM f)M/?f~ City Manager Page 1 of I ~. -- " · .~ .. .. ~.~j I I I I I I I -- lit I I I I I I I···..~ ":::::1' , I ,. ~", QUESTIO~NAIRE FOR CDBG CITIZE~ PARTICIPATION Your County Commissioner and City Council would like LO find out what your community needs are. The information obtained from Lhis questionnaire will be used LO develop progr~s using Community DevelopmenL Block Grant funds Lhat Tarrant County will request from Lhe Department of HOusing and Urban Development. Da'te City Name of the Street where you live: Your interest and cooperation will help make your cit:y and COnLj1uni ty a be1:Ler ~ " place to live. Please put: an "X" in the box that bes~ ans\~:ers the quest:ion of ne~¿. PROJECTS: J.10ST l'ŒEDED NEED DONtT ~~ED CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ c:J CJ CJ r=J CJ c:J c:J CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ Repair of houses Street improvements Curbs and gutters Side~a.lks Store èra.ins Re~oval of architect:ural barriers (Example: Ramps for the handicapped) Senior centers c:J c=J CJ CJ c=J c=J Flood and drainage improvements (example: channel improvements) ,,'ater and sewer CJ CJ CJ In my opinion, the most important single need of my co~~unity out of the above is: Other services my community needs are: (Please list them) My Co¡;¡:nents (oLher things I would like to tell my County Com.~issioner and Ci ty Council) are: .. Notices on co~unity development public meetings are published in area ne~spapers.' citizens' CO~~ents and inpu~ are ~elco~e_ Please return this form to the ci~y officials at the end of the public hearing. or address w7itten CO~~ents to: ~rrant County Planning Department 100 ~. Weatherford Street Fort ~orth. ·Texas . 76102 Thank You for '''our pa~ticipation! :!--- --- ~ ... I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Añm;n; ~1'"r~1'"; nn - Council Meeting Date: 2/10/86 SUbject: romm11n; t'y nØ'uØ 1 nrmøn 1- 'R 1 nl' k ~r~n 1'" Agenda Number: GN 86-13 The Staff is recommending that the Community Development Block Grant for the 12th & 13th year funding be used to reconstruct Harmonson Drive From Dawn Drive to Honey Lane. We feel this will qualify as it is in the Mackey Creek target area. It is unknown at this time how much grant money we will receive as it will depend on the results of the ranking process that will take place at the County on March 11th, 12th and 13th. Individual projects submitted must be for at least $75,000 and our share of the grant money could range from $40,000 to $75,000. If the Harmonson Road project is approved by the County, we will ask the Council to appropriate sufficient funds to meet the $75,000 goal. Recommendation: Approve submittal of Harmonson Drive project for Community Development Block Grant funding. .. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I Ro/~ Department Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of I. I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-F LOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas February 10, 1986 Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 30-319; TARRANT COUNTY/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, HAR~10NSON ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEr1ENTS TRANSMITTAL OF CDBG 12th & 13th YEAR PLAN For your review, comments and/or revisions we are enclosing the two (2) year plan as we discussed. The two (2) year plan consists of street and drainage improvements of Harmonson Road at a $75,000 per year expenditure rate. We have also enclosed a draft resolution for adoption by the Council at its next regular meeting, February 10, 1986. Please call if you have any questions relative to the enclosed materials. TEN/bvg Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 .. METRO/267-3367 I " I ': .' I · I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I· I t' I . . GENERAL PROJECT ~ORMATION . . FOR CDBG 12TH YEAR PLAN YEAR 2 OF 3·YEAR PLAN .Project Name: HARMONSON ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Cens~ Tract ;~~~ber: Pro ject .Location: .' J 132. 05 . . . . HARMONSON ROAD FROM DAWN DRIVE EAST 470 L.F. Type of Project: CONSTRUCT STORM DRAIN AND CURB & GUTTER " HARMONSON ROAD Cost/Engin~ring Estimate': $75,000. C.D.B.G. FUNDS Source of Funding: Engineering ,Firm: .~ KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. ) Applicant: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . . çonta'ct: MR. DENNIS HORVATH, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER (817) 281-0041 ]2ESCRIPTlON OF PROJECT AND EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION Detaiíed Project Description: Install 3611 R.C.P. Storm Drain in Harmonson Road and widen Harmonson Road to 3D' Face to Face with 611 curb & 2411 gutter, stabilized subgrade and other pertinent items which will finish the street in accordance with North Richland Hills·s standard design criteria. .. . . .. .. . I I':·' Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I '. . I I~~. . . . .f' I . . . . -2- D~tailed Project .Purpose: . .. . .. ·The purpose is to improve the deteriorated conditions of the street . surface & alleviate local runoff from the street across residential lots ·by providing curbs and gutters., as well as ·storm drain. Funding ~ource (5): C.D.B.G., FISCAL YEAR 1987 .(12TH YEAR). Site DeSCT~ptJÓn and Eñvironmental Condition:· The project is located in an area of Single-Family Home. The street is currently in substandard condition since there are no curbs and gutters to channel the local runoff. Numerous potholes and patched potholes (bumps) dot the entire driving surface. City Enhancement .of Target Area: The city performs routine ~tr.eet maintenance in this area, but no other specific efforts have.been targeted for this project area. . . A dctõ!iI~d .project.·location Imp (5) and prujt'ct cust l"\lim.ut" sh~cl (s) .ue ëUI.tched (ur . ref ercncc! FEBRUARY 10. 1986 , .snatur(.! THOMAS E. NEWMAN. JR.· . KNOWL TON-EN,GL1SH-FlOWE~S.,~. INC. .. 1901 ·CENTRAl PRIVE, 5tJITE 550 BEDFORD.' TEXAS 76021 . (817) 283';'Q,"}1 . ." ... . 'If.·.1 . D~le I. - 1986 DETAILED ~ROJECT ,ESTIMATE "~TY . ,. ECT CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ... . -... I~ DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE 'AMOUNT 1 EXCAVATION 285 1 , 723 34 940 2 STAB. SUBGRADE (811 THICK) t LIME FOR.STAB. SUB. (40 LBS/S. Y.) 4 6" CURB & 2411 GUTTER - - . .. ° 7 PRIME COAT TACK COAT 1 , 723 3,081 3,081 1,358 445 35 . '- 411 TYPE liB II HMAC (2 EQUAL COURSE,S) J8 2" TYPE "0" HMAC 9 3611 DIA. (CLASS III) RCP tõ- 18" DIA. (CL. III) RCP ~ 10' CURB INLETS 2 .- I . -- t' .. .. - . . 0, .' .. .. . . .. I FUNDING·;' ouree ~ount¡"... Grant $ 75,000.00 I ty $ .. n~Cash S ! ,p~'- $ ... '. . . ~ ~ . . :,- - DATE FEBRUARYIO. 1986 C.Y. S.Y. $ 4.60 $ 1,311.QO TON I 1.60 80.00 6.70 0.25 0.15 7.20 L.F. S. Y·. S.Y. S.Y. S.Y. L.F. 2,756.~0 2,720.00 6,298.00 430.75 .. 462. 15 22,183.20 3.80 5,160.40 50.00 22,250.00 ...... - - . . -..... ... L.F. 25.00 .- _.. -.- "-- _.. .--, ------ . 875.00 EACH 1 ,400.00 SUB-TOTAL DESIGN/ENGIN~ERING Right-af-Way (if any) - . , ~,/ r ~:--, .;.. "___TOTAl PROJECT COST IPARED BY .~1/pj1,{~'~. 7/&j-~- (817') 283-6211 . ·Tl"IlMLl~~ -':I~.'U^~ JR ~ . · I 'VIII" .... ¡;.. ....... W~.. . . RGANIZATION : ··KNO\JLTON;:ENGLISI1':~OWE:~~. TNr. ~ '~901 CENTRAL DR.. SUtTF' ~'5n 2,800.00 $ 67 ,24.7 .30 '.7 ,752.70 $ 7S,OOO.OC I. I Ie I I I I I ·1 Ie I' e. I I I I I" . I ~ I .: .. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION FOR- . CDBG 13TH YEAR PLAN YEAR S OF'3.YEAR PLAN Project Name·: HARMONSON ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Census tract Number: .,1132. OS . Project Location: HARMONSON ROAD FROM 470 FEET EAST OF DAWN DRIVE EAST 470 FEET. Type.of Project: CONSTRUCT STORM DRAIN AND CURB & GUTTER HARMONSON ROAD Cost/Engineering . Estimate: '. ". · ,. .$7,~ t 000. , . Source of Funding: " "C. D. B . G . FUNDS KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS", INC. " Engineering Firm: Applican~: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS :t Coñtaët: MR. DENNIS HORVATH, · ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER (817) ".281-0041 · · DESCRIl7ION OF PROJECT AND EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION ~ - Detailed p.~ðjeci Description: Install 36" R.C.P. Storm Drain in Harmonson Road and 'widen Hannonson Road..:..to 30' Face to Face with 611 curb & 24" gutter, stabil iZed subgrade and other pertinent it~s which'will finish the street in accordance with North Richland Hill's standard design criteria. ' I . .' . .. I .:: . . Ie I I I I I I Ie I ·1 I I I '1· . ..1.. .'.;, ~ I . . -2· . ... . Detail~d ProJect Purpose: , .' 'The purpose is to improve the deteriorated conditions of the street surface & alleviate local runoff from the street across residential lots by providing curbs and gutters, as well as storm drains. , .' Funding'Source (5): · · C.D¡B.G., FISCAL YEAR 1987 (13TH YEAR) . Site Description and Environmental"Condition: . The project is located in an area of Single-Family Home. The street is currently in substandard condition since there are no curbs and gutters to channel the local runoff. Numerous potholes and patched potholes (bumps) dot the entire driving surface. :~ City Enhancemt:rii',of Targt't~Arca: . . The city performs routine street maintenance in this area, but no other specific efforts have been targeted for this project area. .... A dct~ilC'd projëcl luc~t ion ~rl (~) and pruje.·C:1 CO". c..... ¡m.ah" ,hc.·c.·' (,) .an' .u ..adlc.'ct 'ur rcfcrcn~c:. . . ' . ~gn"lun:" ,.: THOMAS E~ NEWMAN, JR. · ~OWLTO~~~NGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. 1901 ·CENTRAL.DRIVE, ·$UITE 550. BEDFORD.'TEXAS 76021 (al?). 283~6Z11 FEBRUARY 10. 1986 D.'I~ . .. . ...:. -. 0.. " . 0 - I'· '.' I. .:, Ie I· I I I I I lilt under this Act, and approved the filing of application for'said ~ding, and I I' I, I I I' · I' f' I RESOLUTION APPROVING & ENDORSING :TIiE PLANNED' COMMUNITY DEVELOPHEJ-rT PROJECTS .' FOR THE CITY OF NORT.H RI CHLAND HI LLS , TEXAS I\~REAS , ,the City of NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . shares in a Cooperative ~greemen~ wi.th Tarrant CO~ty for essential community ~evelopment assistance actjv~ties under Public Law 93-383, The Housing and Community Deýêlopment Act . . of 1974, and' . ' WHEREAS, one public hearing for the purpose of identifying and discussing . . . community development needs, and one public hearing for the purpose of receiving \. ~ and adopting C~~ity develo~~nt proje~t~proposed in the three-year pian" . ~ , . '. h~ve been duly hel~ by thè City of I I . NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , , and WHER£As, after said' public hearings and due consideration, . '1Þ , .' .'. , . ,; ~ j .,... : Council, tity of the City NORTH~RICHLAND HILLS , determined that the project, . . HARMONSON ROAD STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS , -was eligible for. funding ".,~ . - WHE~S, it i-s', , únderstood that any funds not expended on the specifically. approved project ~il¡ ~evert to the Communi~y Development Contingency Fund, 'NOW THEREfORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the. City Council, City of . . . . . . . . NORTH . , RICHLAND HILLS·,' , that said pl·a.nned .' 1986 commùnity dev~lopment proje~ts fólthe ,eity of ,. NORTH RICHLAND HILLS be approved and endorsed. . . APPROVED AÑD ADOPTED this 0 day 0;' , 1986.-- . . o . Mayor AITEST: . . . ..... City.,Sëcretary~, . ·0 '. -I . . ... ~ . '-- ~ ~~ I" / . ". "t:D' ... i-::' 1-'.. .-.....- ".. I ~;::·· hc,Á;-I-À ';--t-~"-~ R ~I. : · ~ ,. >1»/ , I I ~h:::..... ,'::'" ::-:- " g T: ¡ I a- ~ I \ II...! r :::1::iM-=9(1..._- T 1 T r I I 1 ñTT11J] IJ' IT If 't ',1, r· II r! -' 1 1 I == r í T L biT I I I I I ~ .n . I I· ,J ,.)) ::.... I ! I ~ :::J H II ~ -- - I ~ T IlJ~ I I ..ml . . '. ~ I I -:: ¡ : r - H II I- :=:: :::_" J::::J J~ . . . .... -< -- 10- IT I r- LJ · · · . /' ! i -- r I I ~ ~ D _ _ :::::)-- ~I-- I . V'/.,' .,.,.~ iii i I I }:;If nn I .1 - __..::'- , I _ ~ . f · I I.. J I ¡I I I (""-·;::u ' / TT I I --.. T_., ''':'''' ) 11 111/ r -- __ l~..- 'lk ~ rr:--n- -,... · ~ - 10-'" I I I I t=h:' !. I '\ I ... -- -88-:' ___ .-1 ~.L.L.: n:Jl · I I 'If'' :::'fF. ...¡- ì r I ¡..:¡ =[j; I: · I ~l HlfH ! i __ =~l~"~ · 1=!t::::I5H I ., T:g ~ 1 I I T I I I I 1 r f T I i r ~=- _ = \ ~ r I :::~::~¡.....¡ I I )' 1 I 1-1 Q I [Tl R::Y I I :'\~ - J Tì I [ ", ~ P-¡¡ 1 , I' J '1-\ t-rTT m ~ I I J '-.,-. ---': ~111 II iTjr;=¡:{- _._ 1ìii"T~~I-. . /'"11.: ì\ ~;;,.:- \ I \, . I I I Ie ~- ~ r"" ""-- - t' ~~ ~.~ ~v . v ~>o - - ,- .f '-1 I I I · .:::: -l I · ~'t;1a i=__ I I ..ø5.=:¡ ,. ~, -- 1 1 ..- \ 'EJt- ~ . ~~~"'- r ---"7 . ~ ;JJ1J)l..!L I IJ.. . r I I "" I f'''~ ..:: I g@..:¥·fB.~ ~ ;{I, If I }Jrr'~~3~-- I · ~ -- ·::1:=b:f: ~~ ~ '/" I T 1- ~::-_ =---=sEFB- '-"'~ ::::: 'lJ I'll T I h-~T;.I I ~"'--.i - . ~ -= ¡- _ '/" ¡ I , 1 I 1 ø v I"~ tI: :=::::'"'r-7ï"' II 'li ; 11'11111111 I b' I '-..:l.- ~ __ ~ ~ "- ___ -- . ~~~ J J I r-"\.~ - ~~í r'"' ~ l'1...:::::? t -¡- l1li i ,.r:.~ fJ'--t _~ .~.. . nil -I: ~~ . ~ ," .., I I I I I T .1.1;: 1 I! , I 1 l' n I J ~ ct ... . ï T ,f' f I I I I L-. \7 ... --.- z¡ ..'" ,..- ~ 'V' . . f' ,.. I PROJ~CT LOCATION . ' í PROJECT 'LOCATION MAP . .., . . CDBG 12th & 13th YEAR PLAN I 1 c." .0' . " o 0" ,. .. Þ' c". .0 c- ~.. & ~ ~.W( ,~ ;'" '" I.'" , 11' HARMONSON ROAD STR~ET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS . . / ~ . ~ ~ , . - . . ..~ t . -. " . . , I- I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Anmin; ~tr::Jti on Subject: PT'Of~S",iO,..,:¡l S~T'vjr~~ CQnt:ract, ResQlutiQn No. 86-6 Agenda Number: GN 86-14 - Council Meeting Date: 2/10/86 The council committee of Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilman Ramsey and Councilman Kenna (Chairman) have prepared and recommend a Professional Services Contract for the City Attorney. Contract will be available on February 10, 1986. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 86-6. N/A Finance Review Acct. Number N/"^A Sufficient Funds Available Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ¡Ø f)~~ City Manager . Fmance Director II Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I ~ I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I RESOLUTION NO. 86-6 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: I . The City Manager be and is hereby authorized to execute the Professional Services Contract for services of attorney for the city which the City Council Committee has negotiated with Rex McEntire. Passed and approved this 10th day of February, 1986. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City I I I On January 28, 1986, at 10:00 a.m. cst bids for the above mentioned item were opened and I the results are outlined below: I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Purchasing Department: Bid Award to Plains Machinery for one Bomag BWI2R Pneumatic Roller 2-10-86 Council Meeting Date: SUbject: Agenda Number: PU 86-4 Vendor Exceptions Amount A. Darr Equipment 3 40,495.00 B. Shaw Equipment 0 35,200.00 c. Ferguson Manufacturing 1 29,196.00 D. IGM Sales No Bid E. * Plains Machinery 0 28,600.00 EI. Plains Machinery 0 28,850.00 Vendor A Exceptions were: 1. No Speedometer 2. No Tackometer for Engine 3. No Tow Hooks Exceptions were: I. No Speedometer This equipment will be used by Public Works for Overlay Projects and Patch Work. Recommendation: Award Bid To *Plains Machinery, low bidder meeting specifications in the amount of $28,600.00 for one BWI2R Pneumatic Roller. Finance Review Acct. Number 01-60-04-6400 SUffiC~Ava::7it ~ s;&~ /e11jf:; . , tyManager Y COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of I \-, . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS I Star of the Metroplex I~ENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM '- SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: PLAINS MACHINERY COMPANY Request For: Pneumatic Tire Roller I 5624 Airport Freeway I Fort tJort h, Texas 76117 Bid Opening Date: January 28t 1986 10:00 A.M. CST I Date: Requisition No. ! II Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 A.M. January 28, 1986 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: City Secretary Phone: 281-0041 I [ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 Pneumatic Tire Roller 1 Each .. II Make Bomag Mn~øl B\J 12- R $28,600.00 I. I .- II lie I I I ! I Alternate Bid: ,[ . í~.~r;_~~: ..~.;a.~~:_~;e_ q~~;~~~~___2~'~ .. ~J}!_6~lŸ . . , --..-- -- ._~ . .,.--'.- ~ ~-~~-. '.-..~ ~"I =~_.~.- - - i Bid: S26.600.00 I ,.,'"" , ~":"?'.' ''''.~;.'':''''" .~; "'. '." ~. ',' ',C' , , , . r 111 I " SUB-TOTAL All BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID 28,600.00 ~ TERMS Net lith DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH ICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 0-45 DAYS FROM CEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- ties, or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its .5 . terests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- M BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF H RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS. IN SUBMITTING THIS SID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HillS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY: Pla~ns Machinery Company BY: Mike Cellmer PHONE NUMBER: ..ßJ.7 -_ 8~ 1._-0 'i 7fi ~ SIGNATURE: Y't~.J<ú \.:.(.~~h'\L.~ DATE: 1- 26- Sic THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I GENERAL CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS 2. . Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested may be returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS 3. After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS 4. Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, or conditions not called for, unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. Fl':JECTI((~'l OF PROPOSl\LS The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the fOllowing specific reasons: (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. Proposal containing any irregularities. Unbalanced value of any items. Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or suPPlier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (b) (c) (d) ,~, I· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- L. 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF -BIDDERS Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the fOllowing specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6 · AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7. ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Manager. . Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (in~luding actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing ':0 th::o P',;:chasing Agent, t"tating all relev8nt -tnfcrmatic'n with respect t.h~!eLG. 3~ch noticl. shall not in any way constitute a oasis ¡ür an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL ~ (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) I· I Ie (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by . a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- L ". I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I GENERAL CONDITIONS EQUIPMENT BIDS 1. Equipment other than new models will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series identifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2.· The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size aad type of equipment desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications may be acceptable provided such variation, in each instance, is noted on the bid. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. 3. The unit shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the unit made ready for operation. 4. Bidder must fill in all information asked for in the blanks provided under each item. Failure to compÌetely describe the equipment may result in rejection of the bid. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. 5. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the equipment he proposes to furnish. 6. Manufacturer's standard warranty for parts and labor must be included in this bid. 7. For bids ')n m"re tha.i ene uni': of equipment, thp- City of North Richo1.anci ¡:';.L!- reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. ,. I·, I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I This Specification is intended to describe one Pneumatic Tire Roller, Self-Prop~lled and ~ minimum requirements. I. WEIGHTS 1. Basic: 2. Operating: 3. Max Operating: 8,000 Ibs. 9,000 lbs. 26,000 lbs. II. ENGINE 1. Diesel: 4 cylinder 70 H.P. 2. Water Cooled 3. Speed Range: One 0-5 Forward 4. Speed Range: Two 0-12 Forward 5. Speed Range: One 0-5 Reverse 6. Speed Range: Two 0-12 Reverse 7. Fuel Tank: Capacity 25 Gallons 8. Drive System: "Hydrostatic" or Equal III. WHEELS 1. Number of Tires: Front Rear 5/4 or Equal 2. Tire Size: 9 ea. 7.50 - 15 10 ply 3. Brakes: Hydrostatic/Hydraulic or Hydraulic IV. STEERING 1. Steering System "Pivot Steering" Type 2. Steering Method: Hydrostatic VENDOR OFFERS 1. 2. 3. 8952 9548 27,562 1. 4B/3.9 Brand Cummins 2. Yes 0-6.2 0-12.4 0-6.2 0-12.4 29 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Hydrostatic 1. 5/4 " ¿. · _.J:.~-~.__, ..__........_ _ _..____.. 3. ye s 1. 2. .. 'Yes Yes I· I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I , a v. The following items are required and Vendor will indicate compliance by initialing by each item. EXTRA EQUIPMENT REQUIRED 1. Horn 2. Hourmeter 3. Fuel Gauge 4. Trachometer for Engine 5. Temperature Gauge 6. Oil Temperature Gauge 7. Oil Pressure Gauge 8. Generator Light 9. Parking Brake 10. Scrapers with Mats 11. Pressurized Sprinkler System 12. Tow Hooks 13. Speedometer 14. Safety Belt 15. One Amber Revolving Beacon Mounted on a Pole Approximately 8" Above Driver's Seat Top 16. Two Head Lights Front 17. Two Head Lights Rear 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. VENDOR INITIAL 1. 2 3. 4. 5. 6. ~~ ~r__ ~ - ~~-- ~. ~ I L t' Xc - ~- /t( _ l~r /~- / ,..- --- J).._ '-/ .,/: . --<-...--' X··- -. ..(. -~ b/·'~--- 7. Y' , ~--- /~L-- I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I !I I I I -- 1-- . , The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills', on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by (a) Pl~inA M~rhiQ~r~ ~Q~P~QX complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) No exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of . any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. Company Name PLAINS MACHINERY COMPANY By Mike Cellmer Title Salesman Uate January 28, 1986 THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH VENDOR QUOTATION ---- - Vendor Note: (a) Vendor: Company Name (b) Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" . "#I .'_--,__ I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I Department: Purchasing Council Meeting Date: 2-10-86 Designation of Mid-Cities Daily News as the City of Subject: North Richland Hills "Official Newspaper" Agenda Number: PU 86-5 Resolution No. 86-7 On February 4, 1986 at 10:00 A.M. Central Standard Time, bids for the above mentioned request were opened and the results are outlined below. VENDOR EXCEPTIONS AMOUNT Fort Worth Star Telegram Mid-Cities Daily News o No bid $5.15 per column inch I In order for a newspaper to be designated as the official newspaper of a City, they must meet the following requirements according to Section 28A of Vernon Annotated Civil Status. Sub-Section 1: "Publication shall mean any proclamation notice, citation, advertisement, or other matter required or authorized by law to be printed in a newspaper or newspaper by any institution, board, commission, department, officer, agent, representative, or employee of the State or of any subdivision, or district of whatever nature within the State, whether to be paid for out of public funds or charged as costs or fees." ~ Sub-Section 2: "The term "newspaper" shall mean any newspaper devoting not less than twenty-five percent (25%) of its total column lineage to the carrying of items of general interest published not less frequently than once each week, entered as second-class postal matter in the county where published, and having been published regularly and continuously for not less than twelve (12) months prior to the making of any publications mentioned in this Act, except that any weekly newspaper shall be allowed to omit two (2) publication issues in twelve (12) months and still retain its status as a newspaper eligible to make any publication mentioned in this act. II Sub-Section 3: "The term "political sub-division" shall include cities, towns, and villages." The only two (2) publications meeting Section 28A, serving our citizens at the present time are the Fort Worth Star Telegram and Mid-Cities Daily News. Mrs. Remae Ostramger of the Fort Worth Star Telegram advised that they do not "bid" advertisements but they would be glad to publish any of our legal notices, at a rate of $29.68 per column inch. I I ~ Recommendation: Approve Resolution designating the Mid-Cities Daily News as the "Official" City-Newspaper" at the per column inch rate of $5.15. -L- Finance Review Acct. Number 01-13-01-4010 Sufficient Funds Available Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~ Kl1/~ I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Paae 1 of 1 I' .. Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I , I Specification for "Official City" Newspaper Does your newspaper have at least 25% of its total column lineage in each issue devoted to news items of general interest? __'{~________ ~~~~~~_~~:~:~:~~_been published continuously for more than one year? :~~e~~_~~:~:~p~r entered as second class postal matter? í / r. \ !/ . Frequency of publication. -~-Q~~S__~~~~ , Number of subscribers in North Richland Hills, Texas. q tJ 0 --_L_________ ~c I~ The undersigned Newspaper bids -~L_~___________ per column inch for publication of notices for the city of North Richland Hills, Texas. 1lJ.¡¿¿.:e.L'~t.~~____ Name of Newspaper ,/ /// L./ / / /" by: &.:.~- ~_~ ' Title /l (J Uh~ j~. I ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I , I RESOLUTION NO. 86-7 RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, DESIGNATING AN OFFICIAL CITY NEWSPAPER. WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Texas provides that a City shall designate a City newspaper each year, and; WHEREAS, the City Council has not designated an official newspaper this year, and; WHEREAS, the City Council feels that the City needs an official newspaper. BE IT, THEREFORE, RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: The Mid-Cities Daily News is hereby designated as the official City newspaper for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, being a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said newspaper to be used for all official notices and publications ôf said City. PASSED AND APPROVED this 10th day of February, 1986. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I, I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other SUbject: . I Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 2-11-86 Change Order #l on Municipal Complex Site Improvements to decrease the contract by $15,779.40 Agenda Number: PW 86-3 This change order decreases the bid price on this project. It calls for the use of 12tt PVC pipe in lieu of ductile iron pipe and the savings is $15,779.40. Funding Source: This change order involves a transfer of budget from the Rroject account #09-60-00-6750 to Water & Sewer Unspecified projects account #09-60-99-6200. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of change order #l to decrease the contract amount by $15,779.40. Finance Review Acct. Number 09-60-00-6750 SUffiCi¿~ Available · -m~~ "'t9-- ~~ ~/ eJJÞ-e - f)vY1/ ,1,t¿tt?1.{J~ Department Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM REV .-/ Finance Director Page 1 of I ~~ --. I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I f I KNOWL TON..ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INc. CONSUL TINC ENCINE ERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 30, 1986 AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY P.O. Box 2285 Ft. Worth, Texas 76113 Attention: Mr. Steve Vincent RE: 3-335, CITY QF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MUNICIPAL COMPLEX SITE IMPROVEMENTS, CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Attached is change order form No. 1 to the referenced project which covers the reduction in price for substituting 12-inch PVC Pipe for the originally specified 12-inch Class 51 Ductile Iron Sanitary Sewer Pipe. We understand that the price reduction agree~ upon is $10.20 per linear foot. Please sign the attached change order form and return it to our office for further distribution. The next Contractor's Pay Request Form will reflect a reduction in unit price of $32.63 to $22.43 per linear foot for bid item no. 38. Should you have any questions concerning this project, please do not hesitate to call. w RWA/r"a Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager 7r~r. Gene Riddle, Director of Public \-Jorks ,/ Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Lee Ma~ess, Director of Finance "1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works 2-11-86 Council Meeting Date: Subject: Change Order #2 - Morgan Meadows East Drainage Improvements in the amount of $5,175.76 Agenda Number: PW 86-4 This change order is for the purpose of having the contractor install a 6' high chain link fence along the concrete lined channel in lieu of a 4' high chain link fence. There was concern that the 4' high fence may be too easy for smaller children to climb and it would possibly create some extra liability for the city. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of change order #2 on the Morgan Meadows East project for a total amount of $5,175.76. Funding Source: The funding for this change requires a decrease in the budget of Unspecified Projects account #l3-00-99-6150 and a transfer to the budget of projects account #13-00-51-6150. Finan.ce Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) GO Operating Budget - M Other ,- \0" (_ n ø~Q-~~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number 13-00-51-6150 Sufficient Funds Available '~/1k~_~ - ¡ßJ7,1L/) City Manager . Finance Director Page 1 of I I /' ~. I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I , I KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 28, 1986 Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N;E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-317(b), CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MORGAN MEADOWS (EAST) DRAINAGE CHANGER ORDER NO. 2 Enclosed is Change Order No. 2 to the referenced project which has been executed by the Contractor. This change order covers the cost of substituting 6-foot high chain link fence for 4-foot high fence. The total additional cost of this change order is $5,175.76 based on the estimated quantity of fence included in this contract. Upon Council consideration and approval of this change order, please sign this change order and return a copy of the change order form to our office for further distribution. Please call if you have any questions. ~aJ-(jj. .~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc. Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance - Council Meeting Date: 2/10/86 Subject: Contractor Partial Pay Estimates Agenda Number: PAY 86-8- I I I A meeting was conducted on Thursday, January 23, 1986 with the CIP Committee to discuss the possibility of streamlining procedures in scheduling payments of partial pay estimates for all contractors that have construction contracts with the City of North Richland . Hills. Under the present system the major obstacle is timing. The contractors submit pay estimates to the staff, the pay estimate must make its way through construction inspections, to the City's consulting engineer, and then back to the staff for the writing of cover sheets to be presented to the City Council for authorization. Accordingly it is difficult to schedule for the first council meeting every month. I Recommendation It is the recommendation of the CIP Committee that a more streamline payment system be revised as follows: 1. Partial pay estimates to be approved by City's Administrative Staff based on recommendation from the City's Consulting Engineer or Architect. 2. A monthly status report of all projects to be submitted to City Council. 3. All final pay estimates, and change orders to be scheduled for approval of the City Council. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number N/ A unds Available '-?/2..- <-.."...- , Finance Director I Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I I I Department: Utility Council Meeting Date: 2-11-86. Subject: Partial Pay Estimate #2 to Walker Construction Co., in the Amount of $84,669 - Flory Street Improvements Agenda Number: PAY 86-9 This contractor has completed the utility work on this job and is waiting for the gas company to complete their work. Funding Source: Pay Estimate #2 is to be allocated as follows: 13-00-27-6150 09-00-27-6700 09-00-27-6750 Total $ 15,096.60 $ 53,790.30 $ l5,812.l0 $ 84,699.00 Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of payment to Walker Construction Company in the amount of $84,669.00. Finan.ce Review Acct. Number See above Sufficien unds Available Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) GO & REV Operating Budget Other ~ ~~ Department Head Signature Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of I ~/. Ie I I I I '. I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I K NOWL TON-E NG LI 5 H-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 27, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-219, CITY OF· NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FLORY STREET PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS ~~!ER, SEWER, STREET, & DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR1S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.2, dated January 27, 1986, made payable to Walker- Construction Co., in the amount of $84,669.00, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of January 27, 1986. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Scott Jenogan, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions~ We recommend that the total payment, in amount of $84,669.00, be made to \~alker Construction Co., 4028 Daley St., Fort Worth, Texas 76118. · Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a · · .00 'blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. · We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. RWA/lld Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager tv r. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works. THIS COpy FOR Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Pnblic Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Scott Jenogan Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Walker Construction Co. . ,t .) . , :. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283.6211 . METRO/267-3367 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public ~~orks Council Meeting Date: 2-l1-86 Final Pay Estimate #6 to P & R Paving, Inc. in the Amount ot $28.298.77 - Hewitt Street Paving & Drainage Improvements Agenda Number: PAY 86-10 This job is now 100% complete and ready for final payment. Funding Source: Pay Estimate #6 is to be allocated as follows: 13-00-50-6150 09-00-75-6750 $ 28,013.77 $ 285.00 $ 28,298.77 Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of payment to P & R Paving. Inc. in the amount of $28,298.77. Finan.ce Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number Bonds (GO/Rev.) GO & REV SUfficiempna::nt F ods Available Operating Budget ~ ~~ Other ~~__ ~~ ~. ¡j¿t;;¡ç~~j~ Department Head Signature City Manage"r CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM See above , Finance Director I Page 1 of 1 I" ~. I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I , I ~ KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas January 20, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loqp 820 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-210, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS HEWI~ STREET PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S FINAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.6 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Final Pay Estimate No.6, dated January 15, 1986, made payable to P & R Paving Inc., in the amount of $28,298.77, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of December 31, 1985. This project includes paving, drainage, and utility improvements on Hewitt Street. Also included in this project are drainage channel and ~ulvert improvements on a tributary of the Calloway Branch channel at Chapman Drive. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and' we have checked the item extensions and additions. It is our understanding that the City forces have monitored trench density control and in the absence of any negative reports, we would recommend approval of final payment. Contractor earnings for this project total $671,712.90 which is $2,965.13 under the contract amount of $674,678.03. The Contractor agreed to a $1.43 reduction in the price per linear foot for concrete curb and gutter, since 18-inch gutters were constructed instead of 24-inch gutters, as originally specified. This accounts primarily for the reduction in total cost, as noted on the attached "Status Report". In accordance with Section 3.2.11(a) of the contract, the two(2} year term of maintenance will begin on this date, and therefore, will terminate on January 20, 1988. The maintenance obligation includes repair of all water line leaks and malfunctions of all valves, fire hydrants, and other equipment furnished and installed under this contract along with storm sewer line breaks or stoppage. The maintenance obligation also includes sealing of pavement cracks, repair of pavement buckling or other failures resulting from storm drain backfill settlement or other subgrade failure, along with failure of all concrete flatwork and other concrete structures such as storm drain vaults and inlets. The total time of completion was 169 calendar days and the contract completion time is 180 calendar days. The Contractor has completed this project within 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I· · ~. I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I ~ I 3-210 FINAL PAY LETTER PAGE 2 the contract completion time, therefore no liquidated damages were incurred. We recommend the final payment, in amount of $28,298.77, be made to P & R Paving Inc., 2040 Loop 336, Suite 125,'Conroe, TX, 77304. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. w, RWA/lld Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager r~r. Gene Riddle, Director of Public ~lorks4.J:HISCœ'lEOB Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Pðblic Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance P & R Paving Inc. Source of Funds: Accl. Number See above Bonds (GO/Rev.) GO & REV SUfficie~ds Available _. Operating Budget _ _ ~ .. Other ())".. " --.r 11 () ¿f'----'t?<' //.rk~ ~ / -~V k e L~17Ø! Department Head ignatu City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I,' I I I I I I I I ,. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 2-l1-86 Subject: Partial Pa'{ Estimate II 7 to L C H Construction Co.. Agenda Number: PAY 86-11 in the Amount of $134,222.90 - Morgan Meadows East Drainage Improvements This contractor is moving along at this time and he has poured the three box culverts crossing this concrete lined channel and has poured a considerable amount of the concrete channel. The time expired on this job on January 26th and the contractor asked for a 120 day increase on time. The staff talked to the contractor and told him that a 60 day increase on time was more realistic and that is what would be recommended to the City Council. Mr. Lyn Henry, one of the owners of the company, then agreed to accept the 60 day increase in time. I am not sure that the 60 days is going to cover this job. He will probably be over and will be charged liquidated damages on this job. Funding Source: Pay Estimate #7 is to be allocated as follows: l3-00-5l-6150 09-00-15-6700 09-00-15-6750 $ lI3,135.49 $ 9,358.21 $ ll,729.20 $ 134,222.90 Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of payment to L C H Construction Company in the amount of $134,222.90. Finance Review , Finance Director Page 1 of 1,/ I. I I I I I I I .- I I I I I I I Ie I . KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas February 3, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of.North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-317 (B), CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MORGAN r~EADO~JS EAST DRAINAGE IMPROVEr-tENTS CONTRACTOR1S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.7 Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.7, dated February 3, 1986, made payable to L C H Construction Co., in the amount of $134,222.90, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of January 31, 1986. The quantities and conditions of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by his signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. Ue recommend that this payment, in amount of $134,222.90, be made to LC H · Construction Co., P.O. Box 227, Decatur, Texas 76234. Along with a copy of this letter, the Contractor is being furnished a blank estimate form for preparing next month's estimate. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. TEN/lld Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager t~r. Gene Riddle, Director of Publ ic ~iorks+ nus COpy FOR Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance L C H Construction Co. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Subject: Partial Pay Estimate 113 to Cope Construction Co. in the Agenda Number: PAY 86-12 Amount of $90,144 - Public Works Service Center and Animal Control Center Council Meeting Date: 2-11-86 This contractor has most of the rough plumbing installed and pier holes poured and is almost ready to start pouring the slab for these two bUildings. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of payment to Cope Construction Co. in the amount of $90,l44. ~ Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other - Û ~ ~~ ~~~ - ( 4/Vh:;;qf Department Head Signat;ge City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM GO Acct. Number 13-90-01-6200 ds Available . Finance Director I Page 1 of 1 I I i' I -I 1 1 I Ie I I I I I I I t' I KOMATSU ALBERT S. KOMATSU & ASSOCIATES. INC. February 4, 1986 Mr. John Whitney City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 13305 Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Re: North Richland Hills Animal Control/ Public Works Center ASK Project No. 1331.1 and 1332.13 Dear Mr. Whitney: Enclosed herewith are three (3) copies of the Application and Certificate for Payment No.3 for the above referenced project. This has been reviewed by our office and it is now in order for you to issue payment to Cope Construction Co. in the amount of $90,144.00. We have retained one copy for our files. JJ / dl Encl osu res ARCHITECTS' ENGINEERS' INTERIOR DESIGNERS P. O. BOX 2079 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76113 . 817/332-1914 . METRO 429-7463 I , I J I .. '-1 · rl l .~ I ~n \fg ~ I ~ I' I I I ~ .t:: " .~ ; ~~ ., ~ .~ ~ ~ , ¡ I r' 'T I " 11 ,:XJ :,Õ . :I: ~ ,~ ,~cn' -I »:- ~ Z:-f ·CI~ ! : ~ !!C· » 3:'m' z·m < ;C"m :O·~ ,»;0 !'» I! -C' I . : 3: ~ri m mZ !z -t Iii '-I' .1 m ¡:xJ .' I I .. . ~î z: ~~ I~t l- . . . . . ~. À.tJ # '>t.ç.~ . ~+ 'r ./ ./ ~ ~ tItÞ "" ~ \ \ I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ..... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 10, 1986 - 6:30 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Discussion of the Northeast Fine Arts League (Mr. George Angle) 2. Discussion of Contractors Partial Payment (Agenda Item No. 43) (Mayor Pro Tern Davis) 3. Clarification of Pre-Council Notes January 27, 1986 (Mayor Pro Tem Davis) 4. FM 3029 - Precinct Line Road _ Discussion of State Funding Priority (Mayor Echols) 5. Discussion of Community Development Block Grant (Agenda Item No. 37) 6. Other Items 7. *Executive Session to Discuss Land, Personnel, and/or Litigation *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 10, 1986 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER 1. ITEM Call to Order ACTION TAKEN 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting January 27, 1986 5. Removal of Item (s) from the Consent Agenda 6. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by Asterisk (31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 & 47) 7. PZ 85-59 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - Request of Richland Hills Church of Christ to rezone a portion of Lot I, Block 25, Snow Heights Addition and Tract 2B, W.W. Wallace Survey, Abstract 1606, from U (Institutional) and R-7-MF (Multi- Family) to C-l (Commercial) (Located on the south side of Loop 820 east of Rufe Snow Drive) 8. Ordinance No. 1255 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. PZ 85-68 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - Request of Earl McKinney to rezone a portion of Tracts I and IB, E.A. Cross Survey, Abstract 281, and a portion of Tract 3, William Cox Survey, Abstract 321 from AG (Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Family) (Located on the east side of Davis Boulevard north of Odell Street) 10. Ordinance No. 1271 11. PZ 85-69 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - Request of Earl McKinney, Trustee, to rezone a portion of Tracts I and IB, E.A. Cross Survey, Abstract 281 and a portion of Tract ~, William Cox Survey, Abstract 321, from AG (Agriculture) to C-I (Commercial) (Located on the east side of Davis Boulevard north of Odell Street) 12. Ordinance No. 1272 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 13. PZ 85-135 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - Request of T.J. Petroleum, Inc. to rezone Tract A, Block 22, Clearview Addition from C-2 (Commercial) to C-2-SU-Sale of Beer for Off-Premise Consumption (Located on the southeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Birchwood Drive) 14. Ordinance No. 1339 15. PZ 85-144 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - Request of Diamond Glenn Joint Venture to rezone part of Tract 2AI, 2A2, 2A2A and 2A3, M. Lynch Survey, Abstract 953 from R-8 (Zero-Lot- Line) to LR (Local Retail) (Located on the southeast corner of Dawn Drive and Glenview Drive) 16. Ordinance No. 1340 17. PZ 85-149 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Branix Incorporated to rezone Lot 1, Block 31, College Hill Addition from C-I-SU-Beer to C-I-SU-Sale of Beer for Off- Premises Consumption (~hange of Ownership) (Located on the west side of Davis Boulevard at Smithfield Road) I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 18. Ordinance No. 1342 19. PZ 85-150 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Joe Gray to rezone Tracts 3W and 3WI, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located on the south side of Amundson Road west of Precinct Line Road) 20. Ordinance No. 1343 21. PZ 85-151 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Hanson Properties to rezone Tract 3C, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located on the east side of Crane Road and south of the existing Nob Hill Subdivision) 22. Ordinance No. 1344 23. PZ 85-152 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Chart Development to rezone part of Tract lAI, W.D. Barnes Survey, Abstract 146, from C-l (Commercial) to C-~-SU-Sale of Beer for Off-Premises Consumption (Located on the northwest corner of Starnes Road and Smithfield Road) I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 5 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 24. Ordinance No. 1345 25. PZ 85-153 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Richmond Bay Development to rezone Tract D, Block 1, Meadow Lakes Addition, from R-l (Single Family) to R-2 (Single Family). (Located on the north side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive) 26. Ordinance No. 1346 27. PZ 85-154 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Richmond Bay Development to rezone Tract 6, part of Tract 2, W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from R-6-T PD (Townhome Planned Development) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of the existing developed Meadow Lakes Subdivision) 28. Ordinance No. 1347 I" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 6 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 29. PZ 85-155 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Richmond Bay Development to rezone Tract 5, part of Tract 2, W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from R-6-T (Town home Planned Development) to R-7-MF PD (Multi-Family Planned Development) (Located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive and west of the existing Meadow Lakes Subdivision) 30. Ordinance No. 1348 *31. PS 85-92 Request of Roger Hanson for Final Plat of Lots 1-7, Block 1, Nob Hill North Addition (Located on the southwest corner of Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road) *32. PS 85-94 Request of James B. and Donna L. Hamm for Replat of Lots 4RA and 4RB, 6 and 7, Block 3, Industrial Park Addition (Located on the north side of Browning Court west of Wuligar Way) *33. PS 85-96 Request of Fenimore-Franks, Inc. for Final Plat of Western Oaks Addition (Located on the south side of Bursey Road west of Douglas Lane) I- I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I Page 7 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *34. PS 85-97 Request of Crow-Nowlin Association #1 for Replat of Lot 2R, Block 4, University Plaza Addition (Office Complex Site under construction on northeast corner of Weyland Drive and Airport Freeway) 35. SO 86-1 Request of Richland Medical Center for Variance to Section 4.1 of the Sign Ordinance as 3700 Rufe Snow *36. GN 86-12 Proposed Federal Tax Reforms, Resolution No. 86-5 37. GN 86-13 Public Hearing - Community Development Block Grant Funds *38. GN 86-14 Professional Services Contract, Resolution No. 86-6 *39. PU 86-4 Bid Award to Plains Mach.inery for One Bomag BW12R Pneumatic Roller *40. PU 86-5 Designation of Mid-Cities Daily News as the City of North Richland Hills "Official Newspaper", Resolution No. 86-7 *41. PW 86-3 Change Order #1 on Municipal Complex Site Improvements to Decrease the Contract by $15,779.40 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 8 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *42. PW 86-4 Change Order #2 - Morgan Meadows East Drainage Improvements in the Amount of $5,175.76 *43. PAY 86-8 Contractor Partial Pay Estimates *44. PAY 86-9 Partial Pay Est~mate #2 to Walker Construction Co., in the Amount of $84,669 - Flory Street Improvements *45. PAY 86-10 Final Pay Estimate #6 to P & R Paving, Inc. in the Amount of $28,298.77 - Hewitt Street Paving & Drainage Improvements *46. PAY 86-11 Partial Pay Estimate #7 to LCH Construction Co., in the Amount of $134,222.90 - Morgan Meadows East Drainage Improveme~ts *47. PAY 86-12 Partial Pay Estimate #3 to Cope Construction Co. in the Amount of $90,144 - Public Works Service Center and Animal Control Center 48. Citizen Presentation 49. Adjournment I I {' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t- I City of JXðrth RichJand Hills, Texas February 6, 1986 REF: ACMM 0048-86 Memo to: Mayor & City Council From: Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager Subject: City Limit Signs FOR YOUR INFORMATION: The attached letter from the State Highway Department prohibits our welcoming sign to North Richland Hills on State right-of-way. We have ordered and are proceeding with installation of the smaller signs for our streets (Chapman, Bedford-Euless, Rufe Snow, Harwood, and two on Glenview). DH/gp (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 76118 I I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I City of JX.ðrth RichJand Hills, Texas February 6, 1986 REF: ACMM 0047-86 Memo to: Mayor & City Council. From: Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager Subject: Northeast Fine Art League Mr. George Angle, who is President of the Northeast Fine Arts League, will appear at the Pre-Council Monday. Mr. Angle has met with the Library Board and Parks and Recreation Board and is now asking the Council their support of the Northeast Fine Arts League. This support would include the use of the Chapel (converted to a theater) and the use of one room in the Church Building. The room would be for storage of costumes and equipment used by the League. The Chapel would not be reserved for exclusive use for the Northeast Fine Arts League, however, to support their needs a stage would have to be constructed and the ceiling raised. The Northeast Fine Arts League, as well as any other arts organization would have use of the Chapel on a pay as you go fee basis. If you desire to dedicate one room in the facility, construct a stage and support this effort we request Council approval to direct the architects to estimate the cost of constructing a suitable stage and the necessary improvements in that area. This subject will be discussed further during Pre-Council. DH/gp (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TX 76118 I I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I City of J\Prth RichJand Hills, Texas February 3, 1986 Memo to: Mayor & City Council From: Richard Davis, Mayor Pro Tem Jim Ramsey, Councilman The CIP Committee met Thursday, January 23, 1986, to review the status of all projects. Most projects seem to be on schedule with preliminary design and right-of-way acquisition being the most work under progress. The CIP Committee recommends that since all partial payments to contractors · are not required to be approved by the Council, that we not include all these payments in our agenda. Not only will this save a tremendous amount of paperwork for our staff but will allow timely and efficient payment to these contractors. The cost payments made on CIP projects will be included in your monthly activity report for your review. By copy of this memo, I am asking Rodger to put this on the next available Pre- Council Agenda in case of any needed discussion. cc: Rodger Line (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HIllS, TX 76118 I. I City of jXðrth Richland Hills, Texas I I I February 3, 1986 I Memo to: Mayor & City Council I From: Richard Davis, Mayor Pro Tem I Upon reading the minutes of the Pre-Council Meeting dated January 27, 1986 there are a couple of corrections I feel need to be addressed. If you have a different idea of what was decided on for the two following items, please contact Rodger so we may discuss them again at our next Pre-Council Meeting. If there are no different views then I will assume that the following comments are the views of the entire Council: I Mayors Hall of Fame - The mayors' pictures will be displayed in the City Council Chambers until such time a more permanent exhibit area is available in the new library building. The pictures will not be on display in the front foyer. I I R-8 Zoning Issues - The staff was directed to set up a second city/developer meeting with attention focused on all zoning cases, not just R-8 zoning. I I RD: ph I CC: Rodger Line I I I I I (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 I I I Present: I I I I I ITEM I I MAYOR'S HALL OF FAME I I I I I PROPOSED FEDERAL TAX REFORMS THAT IMPACT THE CITY I I I I NOTES ON PRE-COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 27, 1986 Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Jim Kenna Virginia Moody Harold Newman Marie Hinkle Jim Ramsey Rodger Line Dennis Horvath Rex McEntire Richard Albin Gene Riddle Richard Royston Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman City Manager Assistant City Manager Attorney City Engineer Public Works Director Planning/Development Director DISCUSSION Lynn O'Day, representative from the Sesquicentennial Committee, presented to the Council the idea of the Mayor's Hall of Fame. After a discussion it was determined that the dedication of the Hall of Fame will be at 2:30 p.m. February 23, 1986. The Mayors pictures will be displayed in the City Council Chambers until such time as the mural is moved to the Library's new location and at that time the Hall of Fame pictures will be relocated to the City Hall lobby. A decision will be reached later as to the permanent location of the Hall of Fame. Harold McInroe explained to the Council the effects of a recently passed House Bill as it relates to nontaxable bonds. This bill will be taken up in the Senate in February. The House Bill as written at the present time removes the flexibility ASSIGNMENT JEANETTE Please follow up Rex Please follow up I I ITEM I I I I I I I I I I I I R-8 ZONING ISSUES I I I I I 1/27/85 Pre-Council Page Two DISCUSSION municipal governments have in issuing and spending the proceeds of bond sales including very strict arbitrage rules. All bond proceeds from bond sales must be spent within three years and at least 5% must be spent within 30 days. Interest accumulated from the bond sales may only be used for six months and the City must then refund to the treasury arbitrage after six months. The Senate Committee has met on this subject and Senator Packwood, from Oregon, has been directed by the Committee to negotiate with the House Committee to delay the implementation date until 1987. Rex McEntire will prepare a Resolution for the next Council Meeting voicing the concerns of the Council on this law. The Council was also given sample letters to be sent to our Senators and Representatives voicing strong opposition to this bill. The Council was strongly urged to participate in this effort. Mayor Echols suggested a joint Council/Planning and Zoning/Developers workshop to discuss R-8 Zoning. It was decided that it would be preferable to consider R-8 Zoning on an individual basis. The Staff was directed to set up a second City Developer Meeting with attention focused on R-8 Zoning. ASSIGNMENT Richard Royston Please handle I~ I ITEM I DISCUSSION I CITY COUNCIL Councilman Ramsey suggested that the Council GOALS SETTING WORKSHOP pursue a team building/action planning Council/ I I I R-3 ZONING ISSUE I I I I 'I I I OTHER ITEMS I I I I I .. Management Workshop to be held after the election. The Council supported this idea and the workshop will be conducted May 16th - May 18, 1986 at Plantation Inn in Grandbury. Councilman Ramsey presented a study of the residential zoning issues that were passed by the Council since the new Ordinance was adopted. The result of the study indicates that the Council has been very consistent in granting residential zoning with 81% of these cases with no stipulations. This excellent zoning analysis was well received by the Council and seemed to disprove the notion that the Council has been inconsistent. At the Budget Work Session last July it was decided that the City Attorney would be placed under contract the first of the year. Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilman Ramsey and Councilman Kenna (Chairman) were appointed as the committee to draw up the contract and present it to the Council. 1/27/86 Pre-Council Page Three ASSIGNMENT RNL Follow up N~ STAFF Assist Council Committee As Requested I I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f' I City of JXðrth RichJand Hills, Texas February 6, 1986 REF: ACMM 0046-86 Memo to: Mayor & City Council From: Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager Subject: Community Development Block Grant's 12th & 13th Year Plan This item will be discussed at Pre-Council and a Public Hearing is also scheduled. As you are aware, for the past several years CDBG funds have been used for the lining of Mackey Creek Channel. We are now in a situation where the HUD Representative, working through the County, has indicated that the extension of this channel no longer meets the requirements of the Federal Law which requires these funds be spent in low to middle income neighborhoods. The HUD Representative and County Planners have also visited the "target" areas in our City as identified in the Moore Diversified Services Study. They have determined that work in these target areas would also not meet the spirit and intent of the law. The City Engineer has recommended that the next two year plan include upgrading of water line capacity in the Richland Hills West Addition (a targeted area). Our preference at this time would be to continue the channel work, undertake street improvements in the target area or a third alternative the water line replacement. The Staff feels it is undesirable to use Federal money to upgrade Revenue Fund Activities as opposed to tax supported activities. One final option being considered at this time is to not accept the $34,000 HUD Grant thereby gaining additional points for next years allocation. However, this seems to be a risky option as there may not be CDBG funds next year. Between this date and Monday's Council Meeting we will attempt to come up with a good project that will qualify.. DH/gp (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 76118 I I {' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JANUARY 27, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. I . CALL TO ORDER Mayor Echols called the meeting to order January 27, 1986, at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Marie Hinkle Jim Kenna Virginia Moody Harold Newman Jim Ramsey Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Lee Maness Gene Riddle John Whitney Richard Royston Richard Albin Don Bowen City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney Finance Director Public Works Director Purchasing Agent Director of Planning City Engineer Planning & Zoning Member Press: David Ray Mark England Chris Williams Northeast Chronicle Mid Cities Fort Worth Star Telegram 3. INVOCATION Councilman Kenna gave the invocation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 13, 1986 APPROVED Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of January 13, 1986. Motion carried 7-0. I I , I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I January 27, 1986 Page 2 5. REMOVAL OF ITEM (S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA None 6. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, & 19) APPROVED Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. 12. GN 86-11 PUBLIC HEARING, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS Mayor Echols stated the following: "The purpose of this Public Hearing is to receive citizen input regarding needs of our low to moderate income neighborhoods. The Housing & Community Development Block Grant Program of Tarrant County is now in its 12th year. Funds from this program have been used in the past for channel improvements on Mackey Creek from Onyx Drive South to Harmonson Road. Other eligible CDBG activities which may be considered by HUD for federal funding include water and sewer system improvements, street improvements, sidewalks and wheelchair ramp construction, parks and recreational facilities development, fire station construction and housing rehabilitation. All citizens, groups and organizations of our city are welcome to participate and be represented in the formulation of the 12th year plan. This Public Hearing is open for public advice, .comments, complaints, questions or presentations of alternative proposals. The public may present their views in writing by obtaining a questionnaire from the City Secretary, complete it and return it to her office. The proposed projects will be discussed at the next City Council Meeting, Monday, February 10, 1986, at 7:30 p.m." Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 7. PZ 85-148 REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL HEARING ON PZ 85-148 GRANTED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to set the Appeal Hearing on PZ 85-148 for February 24, 1986. Motion carried 7-0. I' I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I January 27, 1986 Page 3 *8. GN 86-7 APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 1338 _ STREET AND DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT POLICY APPROVED *9. GN 86-8 RAILROAD CROSSING SIGNALIZATION AT SMITHFIELD ROAD AND ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY APPROVED *10. GN 86-9 APPROVAL TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL POLLING PLACES, RESOLUTION NO. 86-3 APPROVED *11. GN 86-10 APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RESOLUTION NO. 86-4 APPROVED *13. PU 86-2 BID AWARD TO FIRST RESPONDER FOR ONE TYPE I MODULAR AMBULANCE APPROVED *14. PU 86-3 BID AWARD TO TRINITY EQUIPMENT FOR TWO 72" DIESEL POWERED MOWERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,166.00 APPROVED . * 15 . PW 86-2 CHANGE ORDER #2 _ CHAPMAN DRIVE PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *16. PAY 86-4 RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT TO WALKER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF·$47,631.60 FOR PAY ESTIMATE #1 ON FLORY STREET IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *17. PAY 86-5 RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT TO LCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $158,374.20 FOR PAY ESTIMATE #6 ON MORGAN MEADOWS EAST DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED I- I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I January 27, 1986 Page 4 *18. PAY 86-6 RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT TO MID-STATE UTILITIES, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $62,039.36 FOR PAY ESTIMATE #1 ON CARDINAL LANE WATER EXTENSION APPROVED *19. PAY 86-7 RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT TO AUSTIN ROAD COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $85,617.30 FOR PAY ESTIMATE #3 ON MUNICIPAL COMPLEX SITE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED 20. CITIZEN PRESENTATION THE CHASEWOOD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY RE: QUINTEN'S CROSSING APARTMENTS SITE BARRING FENCE 1) Mr. Tom Michaels, Vice President, Chasewood Construction Company, appeared before the Council. Mr. Michaels stated he would like to ask the Council to clarify a situation that had come up concerning a stipulation that was placed on the zoning of Quinten's Crossing Apartments. Mr. Michaels stated that when Chasewood bought the property in 1983 they were unaware of the stipulation that was placed on the property. Mr. Michaels stated the City Staff brought it to their attention that a site barring fence was required on the project. Mr. Michaels stated at that time they approached Mr. Fox, Superintendent of the Schools, concerning plans for the development of the school property, and Mr. Fox advised that the school did not have development plans of that area. Mr. Michaels stated they also discussed the need to have a site barring fence between the school property and Chasewood's property. Mr. Michaels stated they came back to the City and advised them of the meeting with the school and at that time found that a letter was sent over one year ago responding to the communications they had with the city. Mr. Michaels stated unfortunately the communications had been lost. Mr. Michaels stated they went back and talked to Mr. Fox again about development plans and Mr. Fox felt it would be developed into a parking lot for the school. Mr. Michaels stated the ordinance zoning Quinten's Crossing had a stipulation of a site barring fence constructed on the northeast side of the tract. Mr. Michaels stated that Ordinance No. 1080, Section 24, describing screening fences stated that a masonry fence was acceptable and a stockade wood fence was also acceptable. Mr. Michaels stated that at that point they approached Mr. Wheeler and hefelt a masonry fence was necessary. Mr. Michaels stated that because of the cost they would like to put up a wooden fence. Mr. Michaels stated the present parking lot was screened from the adjacent housing by a wooden fence. Mr. Michaels stated the northeast property line of Chasewood is next to TESCO's right-of-way and they felt there was not a need for a screening fence. Mr. Michaels stated he hoped the City would allow them to put a wooden fence along the east property line and not force them to put it along the north property line. I' I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I . January 27, 1986 Page 5 Mayor Echols stated that he would like to point out that in a citizen's presentation the Council did not make any decisions. Mayor Echols stated that since this stipulation was added by the Council and they passed the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, he would say that an appeal request would be in order. Mr. Line stated it would be beneficial to the Staff to have an indication from the Council on their feelings. Mr. Line stated he would like to point out that the Planning & Zoning Commission did approve the zoning subject to a masonry fence. Councilman Ramsey stated this question came up quite frequently and it was his understanding that when the Council adopted a Planning & Zoning Ordinance they were adopting the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Councilman Ramsey stated it was also his understanding that when the Council was looking at changing an ordinance that the Planning & Zoning Commission had approved, it was to go back through the Planning & Zoning process because Council approved as Planning & Zoning recommended. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated for the Council to change the ordinance to relieve Chasewood of the requirement of the northern fence would require a rezoning of the property. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated it was the Council's intention to adopt the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Mr. Michaels stated the Staff recommended they talk to the Council rather than file a zoning case. Councilman Kenna stated he felt the Staff needed to get with the gentleman since the Council could not vote on Citizen's Presentation. 2) Mr. Jim Nichols, 2829 Winterhaven Drive, RYA Baseball Commissioner, appeared before the Council. Mr. Nichols stated that it was recently brought to his attention that RYA might not have a park to hold their- baseball games. Mr. Nichols stated there was an electrical problem at Richfield Park that would not be corrected until June. Mr. Nichols stated the problem was that registration, uniforms and equipment needed to be done as soon as possible. Mr. Nichols asked that the project be expedited so the program could be organized. Mr. Nichols stated it was his understanding that bids were still being taken. ~ Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked what t~e electrical problem was. Mr. Nichols stated the underground cables were not set right and that they wanted to set the breakers outside of the building. Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked how long the construction would take. Mr. Nichols stated he had been told that bids were still being taken and he did not know how long it would be. Mr. Nichols stated he needed to begin his schedule for nighttime games. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if it would be acceptable to delay the construction. 1- I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I January 27, 1986 Page 6 Mr. Line stated it was not recommended to delay the construction because there were high voltage lines that were only a couple of inches under the dirt. Mr. Line stated the money had been allocated and the plans and specifications were virtually complete. Mr. Line stated the City was doing everything they could to accelerate the project. Mr. Horvath advised that the City Engineer had just advised him the construction could possibly be done by April 15, 1986. Mr. Nichols stated he would appreciate anything the City could do to expedite the matter. Councilwoman Moody asked about scheduling daytime games. Mr. Nichols stated games could be scheduled for Saturday, but you could only play so many games in a week. Councilwoman Moody asked if there was any other place they could use. Mr. Nichols replied no. Councilman Fisher asked if the City would want the contractor to work more than 8 hours a day in order to accelerate the project. Mr. Line stated that the City wanted to speed up the project and could have the contractor work 24 hours a day but it would cost more than the $100,000 that was allotted for the project. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he felt the Staff would do everything they could to get the baseball program started on time. Mr. Nichols stated that he would appreciate anything they could do to accelerate the project. 3) Linda Turk, 6266 Gayle, President of RYA, appeared before the Council. Ms. Turk stated the Council had answered all their questions and she would relate to the parents of RYA members the Council's reaction to the problem. 21. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to adjourn the meeting. Dan Echols, Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary I' I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: 2/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PZ 85-59 Request of Richland Hills Portion of Lot ,B Tract 2B WW Wallace R-7 MF to C-l ORDINANCE NO. 1255 This Zoning Application is presented on a vacant tract of land located on the south side of Loop I H 820 east of Rufe Snow Drive. The subject tract is the unimproved eastern portion of the property which belongs to the Richland Hills Church of Christ. The requested rezoning is from U Institutional and R-7 Multi-family to C-l Commercial. The requested rezoning will allow the property to be marketed. No indication has been given by the applicants as to a prospective user for the subject tract. At the hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission a large contingent of citizens appeared to protest the proposed rezoning. In addition a petition was filed containing 29 out of 31 names of those receiving official notice in opposition to the rezoning. The signatures represent over 30 percent of the noticed property. The petition is therefore legal requiring that the requested rezoning be approved by a three fourths majority. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of Zoning Application PZ 85-59 requesting rezoning of a portion of Lot 1, Block 25, Snow Heights Addition and Tract 2B, W.W. Wallace Survey Abstract 1066, from U and R-7 MF to C-l. This hearing before the City Council is in appeal of that denial. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available £11<t~ nt Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director - Paoe 1 of D/~w e~. C-I . , C-, I , FP , , I \ , \ \ , \ , , , ~ I- . .,¡ Page 6 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 I , 5. PZ 85-58 I I ~ I ~~_..~ .;,-#"0- ,------- ,.-- 1 6. PZ 85-59 I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I ( l- Request of D. S. Byrd to rezone 3R, Block 23, Clearview A e 10n, its present classife 10n of C-2-Specific -Sale of Used Autos (with rictions) to C-2-Specific - ale of Used Autos. This property is located on the south side of Maplewood Drive at Grapevine Highway. Chairman Bowen said due to illness, this request will be postponed until June 27th, 1985. Request of Richland Hills Church of Christ to rezone a portion of Lot 1, Block 25, Snow Heights Addition, and Tract 2B, W. W. Wallace Survey, Abstract 1606, from their present classifications of U (School, Church, & Institution District) and R-7-MF (Multi-Family) to C-l (Commercial). This property is located on the south side of Northeast Loop 820 and bounded on the west by the Richland Hills Church of Christ. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. ',Charles,Owen, 5425 Martin Drive, came forward to represent to church. He said they had outgrown their present facility and had purchased more property and had already started on the street. He said they plan to ~~ üfç e I"1.dus trial Bouleva~cd dO\~Tl inJ Mea.dow Lakes Mr OWøT' RR i rt r1,ø~T ha'Y~. 12 acres with 6 acres in parking lots. He said they put in a temporary parking lot on this property because they hold three services on Sunday morning and all parking is full. Mr. Owen said they have had some groups interested in purchasing the church, but they do not want to purchase these 6 acres. He said it makes the package too large to be feasible. I' ' Page 7 ( P & Z Minutes I June 13, 1985 , I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I (- Mr. Owen stated they are asking for C-l Commercial on 1.9 acres of R-7-MF and 3+ acres zoned U for a church. He said they had written letters to the neighbors and had a neighborhood meeting. He said the neighbors were concerned about the weeds which I thought were always mowed; they were concerned about the drainage along the fence line. Mr. Owen said they sent an engineer, Delbert Stembridge, to check it out and there was water standing on our side of the fence. He said some of the drainage could be coming from the temporary parking lot, but it will be taken care of. Mr. Owen said the drainage was centered over a 25 foot pipeline easement which is lower than their property. Mr. Owen said the property owners were also concerned about a screening fence and asked if they would put in a masonry fence. He said will agree to do this even though it will cost $35,000 to $40,000; he said they will do this prior to obtaining a building permit. Mr. Owen said property that close to a church will dictate what goes in there. ,He said,it may be sold to another church or some public service such as a hospital or nursing home. Mr. Owen said they have a contract on a half acre for a garden office for a doctor per this zoning request. Mr. Owen stated this ~~nrørty frnnt~ on the Interstate 1,000 feet long and backs up to residential. He said they feel the best use if for C-I. Mr. Owen said they have been there 15 years and they would put up a masonry fence and see that the land is properly drained. I' Page 8 ( P & Z Minutes I June 13, 1985 , 1 I I I I I -- I I I I I I I -- I ( Fred Les with the Richland Hills Church of Christ came forward. He said Redondo Street dead-ends into their property which causes drainage problems. He said they feel that if they build Redondo on to the freeway would help the drainage. Mr. Les said one morning he counted 40 cars that went across the church property onto the freeway. He said most were school children and mothers going to school. Mr. Les said they would develop Redondo Street across their property to the access road. Forrest Grubb, 6528 Tabor, came forward. He said he felt the best use for this property is C-l and they have agreed to help the neighbors. Steve Roseberry, 6428 Simmons Road and a member of the church, came forward. He said he felt that Commercial use would be the best for the property since it runs along Loop 820. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please corne forward. .Ernest aedgcoth, 7001 Corona, came forward. He said he had been asked to represent 29 of the 31 homeowners within 200 feet of this property who oppose this zoning request. He said the basic reasons for opposing the C-I zoning are~ 1, the red~ction of tbe V~ 111~ of tnp p,..n~pr1-yñ"p 1-n t.'''~ increase of traffic, noise, trash, and increased drainage problems; 2, Many of the permitted uses in C-l such as hotels, motels, supermarkets, shopping malls, strip centers, drive-in restaurants, plus the uses permitted in Local Retail would be totally out of character with the existing single family zoning; 3, the city has an abundance of C-I zoning within half mile of this site such as along Rufe Snow Drive to Bursey Road where many I' Page 9 ( P & Z Minutes I June 13, 1985 , I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I -- I . ( strip centers are vacant and additional ones are under construction. Mr. Hedgcoth said the North Hills Mall is opening another area equal to the existing mall and the area north of Loop 820 has several C-l zoning vacant and we feel this city does not need this additional 6 acres of C-I. Mr. Hedgcoth stated several homeowners met with Mr. Owen and some members of the church Tuesday and they indicated that the church did not want to sell the property for any use that would damage the neighborhood and that many of the permitted uses were objectionable to them. He said they also agreed to placing a requirement on the property to construct a masonry screening fence along the south boundary line at the time a building permit is issued for any building on the site. Mr. Hedgcoth the homeowners would definitely ask that this requirement be placed on any screening fence regardless of the zoning classification placed on this property. Mr. Hedgcoth said Mr. Owen stated that they had a contract pending on a half acre at the east end of the site with a proposed use as a single story office bUilding. He said it was implied that this would be the use for most of the property with some light retail; he said the light retail is wha 1 T.T!" n 1, j ;:> (' t 1- n AT'I~ T.T""nId r1 0 f i T\ i to ^ , :. prefer the office development. Mr. Hedgcoth said they know that the church has the welfare of the neighborhood in mind now by the restrictions of the type use placed on the sale of the property; they do not want an undesirable use on the property since they are moving across Rufe Snow; however, the neighborhood has no insurance that the property will not be passed on th someone who I' Page 10 ( P & Z Minutes I June 13, 1985 , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I ( would construct a high rise bUilding, a Jack-in-the-box or some other use that will damage our property simply because we live next to the C-1 zoning. Mr. Hedgcoth said with this in mind, the neighbors are requesting that this commission not grant this C-l zoning and ask that a zoning class of 0-1 (Office District) be placed on the property which would insure the homeowners that their property will be protected from any of the devaluing uses in C-l. He said C-l zoning could cause them to be open all hours of the day and night but office zoning would be morning and evening. Mr. Hedgcoth asked all the neighbors who were in opposition to this request to stand and about half of those in the council chamber stood. Jim Cato, 6729 Corona, came forward. He said he lives west of the property in question. He said he felt this was spot zoning; there would be no buffer between it and the single family. Mr. Cato said if you require them to build Redondo Street, you should get right-of-way for Vance also. ,Chairmap Bowen said all this would be addressed during the plat.ting process. Mr. Cato said they might have second thoughts if they have to build Vance and Redondo streets. Karolrl r~t0 ~729 Cornn~: ~~me forward. She said she would prefer 0-1 zoning and they could barricade Redondo Street. She said Vance Road is shown to be a two-lane undivided collector and Redondo is not. Mrs. Cato said Redondo is a very crooked street and it goes by two schools. She said the church told them the City Staff wanted Redondo to go through. I- I , I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I -- I Page 11 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 PZ 85-59 DENIED ( ( Mr. Owen came forward. He said the city does want Redondo to go through and take care of the drainage. He said he feels 0-1 would restrict them, they could not have a nursing home, hospital, or funeral home. John Casacottas, Corona, came forward. He said he likes the peace and quite of the neighborhood and feels we have sufficient C-I without adding more. Mr. Hedgcoth came forward. He said he would like to read the list for 0-1 zoning, page 72 of the Zoning . Ordinance: "Professional offices, General organizational offices, Governmental offices, Lodges, civic clubs, fraternal organizations, Banks and savings and loan buildings, Veterinarian clinic (no kennels), Public schools, City and utility uses, and Medical clinics." He said it looks like nursing homes could be there if you could handle animals and feel 0-1 is sufficient. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker said usually along major ,thoroughfares there is Commercial, but the traffic is bad and this is a narrow strip. He said we want the highest and best use for the property, but we do not want to disrupt what is already there. Mr. Tucker said some Commercial businesses Opet'at(; 7 days a week. He said the church could have good intentions, but when the property is sold, they could put anything there that is in C-l zoning. Mr. Tucker said he felt the more restrictive zoning is best; he feels 0-1 is better. Ms. Nash made the motion to deny PZ 85-59. This motion was seconded by Mr. Tucker and the motion to deny carried 4-0. I~ I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I P I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas May 17, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 85-59 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM IU, R-7-MF' TO C-1 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 121 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. Ú/A-:- RWA/ra Enclosures cc·.. M...,. Rcdger M I.: "'^ (' ~ t,. M~..,.,,........ " -.. .......-, _I J '.I".,_(\~_, Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 85-59 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I.. . .. " .. ' :' ' I , I I I I I I Ie· I I I I I' I I __n, I ( ( 1-( b~ c¡ tJ- II: c/ ¿, £1. rf-· TO: City Council City of North Richland Hills DATE: TIME: CASE NO. P 2. 8S'"- S"c¡ We, the undersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hills. living within 200 feet of the subject property, hereby object to the rezoning of said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would not be conductive to the public safety, health. convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. ~A.)R_£;rJÄ t éuø?tC(, .-# Ie If 7'IS ?C~<t elroy/d', ~~/ / (:' Þ'd~ ')- A.é/'L 2(.) Ù ,) 7 ð / 7 ß·~/Lðz?a.. Þ U .o~ f. "':zC7r' I I - j/' '" -' . , ~: ./ Î /( ~/ / L' / 7 ~-..J /(2 ~ C(~L~!l~l /).- LA,fYCl,t--Á- ( -/0 -ý~- æ-c-./c/,A{J .~¡-â . 'Æj ? U/~7>~ 6 -/tl-.f'...s- /U(-{~~~ ~-c4 .2~U~ 7 I." -;{ ([ r¡ () / 3 C .-t--'1 (J->1..,~ ~ /'/ð/ ~t:.:t..-, ~c!'~ /Zd ~ ~ ~øo/ I...~' /-..' ~ ..., þ I , I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I ( TO: City Council City of North Richland Hills DATE: TIME: .J /.. "/ / _ '. 1<-- ....J .-. ',~ 4' , 7 ,':;; /:~,' ;1 '" /,... / ..: CASE NO. pz. 8S--S-C¡ We, the undersigned property owners of the City of North Richland Hills, living within 200 feet of the subject property, hereby object to the rezoning of said tract for the following reasons: This rezoning would not be conductive to the public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. DATE: ADDRESS: 6 -7-i'f ¿, Yl7 d)1f~AJR I)LO~K ~/~ Ácr 6 bey I Cð /Lð'" #- ðJ.Ð LK, ""," L,ø '7 ..r-il.. ¿'c;>c;s dð~C/tl ~ L e:::¿ ~~ , / <. " , ,/ . I,· ,_ "" ../ -' r.::: .'..~ c"'· . 7 4//1 ¡,. 4R J3¿IL Z/ ¡¿ ,~, . /~/ "'7 / "...:. ,/ ..¡;. ,.-; ". ".,....,...,:..,.../_,Ø'; .:,¡r.,r,~.I_., }-"". r u.... I I .;' ",Ij" ,/'" . T' (' I " /,' t r " /ð2.h ~~ ~ ":::J~.k'7 htf'ðR ~11:J7'J¿¿' ~.¡. / ßI.Ic. 2 , I I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I , I ORDINANCE NO. 1255 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-59 the following described property shall be rezoned from U and R-7-MF to C-l. THE DESCRIPTION OF a 5.53 acre tract of land situated in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; said tract being a portion of Lot 1, Block 25, Snow Heights Addition, as recorded in Volume 388-124, Page 100, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; said 5.53 acre tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING in the south line of said Lot 1, Block 25, Snow Heights Addition, and being the northeast corner of Lot 7R, Block 21R, Snow Heights Addition, as recorded in Volume 388-17, Page 417, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 00 degrees 01 minutes West, a distance of 293.61 feet to a point in the north line of said Lot 1, Block 25, and being in the south right-of-way line of Interstate Loop 820 and being at a point in a curve to the right; THENCE along said curve to the right and the south R.O.W. of I.S. Loop 820, said curve having a radius of 5554.58 feet, a distance of 615.42 feet to a point at the beginning of another curve to the right; THENCE along the curve, and continuing along the south R.O.W. line of I.S. Loop R20, said curve having a raG~US of 5604.5ó ¡eeL, a di~Lance or 598.1J feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 03 minutes East, 41.05 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 00 degrees 01 minutes East, 25.30 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 59 minutes West, along the north property line of Block 20 and a portion of Block 21R, Snow Heights North, for a distance of 1,189.70 feet to the point of beginning and containing 5.53 acres of land. .~ . '1 .. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I " I - Page 2 This property is located on the south side of Northeast Loop 820 and bounded on the west by Richland Hills Church of Christ. DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1985. ~~~2-'~ ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-59 IS HEREBY REZONED C-l THIS 12th DAY OF AUGUST, 1985. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 2/10/86 ubject: Request of Earl McKinney, Trustee to Rezone a Portion Agenda Number: PZ 85-68 of Tract 1 and 1B, E.A. Cross Survey Abstract 281, and a Portion of Tract 3, Wm. Cox Survey, Abstract 321 from AG to R-3 ORDINANCE NO. 1271 This Zoning Application is presented on a vacant tract of land located on the east side of Davis Boulevard north of Odell Street. The subject tract is adjacent to the existing Stoneybrooke Addition on the north. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-3 Single Family. The purpose for the requested rezoning is to allow the development of residential lots in conformance with the R-3 District criteria. The subject tract is 4.5 acres in size and is located 500 feet east of Davis Boulevard. The tract, as configurèd, is virtually land-locked. None of the existing or proposed street patterns in the area are located such that the subject tract can be effectively served. Access for this tract can only be provided through the adjacent proposed commercial tract to the west being requested in PZ 85-69. A large contingent of citizens from the Stoneybrooke and Odell areas appeared in opposition to the proposed rezoning. A petition was also filed from the surrounding area. The petition did not contain sufficient signatures to require a three fourths vote of the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of Zoning Application PZ 85-68 requesting rezoning of a portion of Tract 1 and IB, E.A. Cross Survey, Abstract 281 and Tract 3 Wm. Cox Survey Abstract 321 from Ag to R-3. This hearing before the City Council is in appeal of that denial. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available 1< 11/ ~ ent Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Paae 1 of 1 I I -- #"'11 ""f ~G_. / / / / / / / / / / L I~ ~ . I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I , I Page 20 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 14. PZ 85-67 PZ 85-67 APPROVED ( ( Chairman Bowen stated it does better fit the zero lot line zoning. This gives more protection, but it allow homes with small lots and puts a ,200 square foot minimum instead of e 1,000, requires them to have rages, and they can be attached or etached. The motion carried 4-0. Request of Clifford . Pearson to rezone Tract lA, omas Sprouse Survey, Abstrac 1399, from its present class· ication of AG (Agricultur to R-3 (Single Family). This prop ty is located on the south side of ursey Road and the west side of Do glas Lane. C airman Bowen opened the Public ¿aring and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward. He said to the south of this property is R-3 zoning, to the west is Commercial, and across the street is in Keller and they request a zoning change to R-3. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please 'come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the C~airman closed the Public µn~-~~g. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PZ 85-67. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together but would be voted on separately. I- Page 21 p & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 I Ie 15. PZ 85-68 I I I I 16. PZ 85-69 I I Ie I I I I I I I , I ( ( Request of Earl McKinney, Trustee to rezone a portion of Tracts 1 & IB, E. A. Cross Survey, Abstract 281, and a portion of Tract 3, William Cox Survey, Abstract 321, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Family). This property is located east of Davis Boulevard and bounded on the east by Stonybrooke Addition. Request of Earl McKinney, Trustee, to rezone a portion of Tracts I & IB, E.- A. Cross Survey, Abstract 281, .and a portion of Tract 3, William Cox Survey, Abstract 321, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to C-l (Commercial). This property is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard and west of Stonybrooke Addition. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Delbert Stembridge, Consulting Engineer, came forward. He stated this tract fronts on a a major highway,- Davis Boulevard. He said they have requested a buffer of R-3 between Stonybrooke and the request for Commercial. Mr. Stembridge said the area requested for Cornmei'cial has a lot of drainage problems and would not be suitable for '~ingle family~ Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Donald Chaille, 8405 Timberline Court, came forward. He said he was speaking for the residences in Stonybrooke and on Odell Street. He stated that they previously asked for Commercial on the entire tract. I· I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I , I ." Page 22 P & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 ( ( Mr. Chaille said the property owners are against these requests because they want to protect their property value. He said there is already enough Commercial on Davis Boulevard, plus the traffic is bad now and this would make it worse. Mr. Chaille said nothing has changed, the neighbors protest both requests and request the entire 15 acres be restricted to R-2, residential. He said R-3 will not be good enough, 7500 square foot lots instead of 9000 and 1400 square foot houses instead of 1600. Mr. Cnaille read an article from the Star Telegram regarding problems in North Richland Hills. He said he felt this would be spot zoning. Mr. Chaille asked what the Master Plan shows for this area and asked why couldn't this area be developed as R-2 Single Family. He said he had submitted petitions on both cases and requested a show of hands of those who were in opposition to these requests. P. C. McGreggor came forward. He said the only reason Davis Boulevard is going Commercial is the Commission is granting it. He said it will soon be another Belknap Street. Mr. McGreggor said in Dallas and Fort Worth there are. busy highways with nice homes on both sides so whY,can't they build R-2 Single Family homes on this entire tract. Mr. McGreggor said Mr. Burk Collins waö in pL~v¡ously wich property to the south of this property and he was told he would have to take care of the drainage; will this property drain onto the property Mr. Collins had. Mr. Royston said the developer must take care of the drainage on his site and the adjacent area. Mr. McGreggor said he is against these requests. I' "', .,. I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I , I Page 23 p & Z Minutes June 13, 1985 (, PZ 85-68 DENIED PZ 85-69 DENIED 17. PZ 85-70 ( Chairman Bowen said he does not feel this would be spot zoning because there is Commercial all along Davis Boulevard. v. L. Gibson, 8333 Odell Street, came forward. He said he had lived here for 33 years and he believes it is spot zoning and feel they should keep Commercial away from residential. Mr. Gibson said they have 28 acres of Heavy Industrial to the south of his property and this would make Commercial to the north. He said they have retail across the street and in between is residential. Mr. Gibson said they are only asking R-3 for 270 feet of the 1000 feet which is no buffer. He said he felt this was going against the Master Plan. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Bowen said he was not sure R-3 was a good plan for the small tract because there was no entrance to it. Ms. Nash made the motion to deny PZ 85-68. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried ·3-1 with Mr. Tucker voting against denial. Ms. Nash made the'motion to deny PZ 85-69. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 3-1 with Chairman Bowen voting against denialr Chairman Bowen stated the next requests would be heard to voted on separately. Roger & Joan Hanson to one Lot 4, Block I, Martin Addition, from its present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family). This property is located west of Precinct Line Road and adjacent to Nob Hill Addition. I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I ( " ( K NOWL TON-E NC LI SH-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSUL TINC ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 22, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HIllS ZON!~G CASE PZ 85-68 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-3 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 70 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. "" RWA/ra Enclosures c(,': Mr. Rodger :~. Line, City i9;dfJdY~~ Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 85-68 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 , I e I I ~1 I'> To: City Council 1 (J/ Date: Ci ty of North Richland Hills /8£ (0 Case: ~ We, the residents living within 200- of subject property in PZ85-68, object to the rezoning of said tract to R-3 for the following reason: An R~3 designation will adversely affect the property values of residents in Stonybrooke where code is R-2 The undersigned also object to the reclassification of property in PZ85-69 to C-1 for the following reasons: This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. 85-69 ~"'I! - t ç f,' ~ I yb ADDRESS ~~ .--:-( /~ '-) I ~ - (¡:..~ !)I'·:-V<-{ / {.. /~ ~.I ·~f~~ a~ __~. 6 - Li - cŸ ~ f ~cJ L-' T ~tv~ 67- II ,i k . ~ . _:_ .______~~ ~:û y~;~ _~=- 6 _'-_.. ___L~. ---..... .._. -....... ... . t? _/~ ~ _. .._..___..<l -_.~._.. ,_q_~_~_ ---5z;. Ie C~~/t.'~ / ~- . '.- ýr;/ I I'h F'/ "-~.'.......1....'\ .' ì:,..,.>...'~__.._,_/.)'>-."'_.',,_"'__'_.~.~~'J_,,~"_'.C..·,'-,_""_'.__,, (~ I _ ('_,.__J_.,_..__~. ',) (~~)--1/.~ - -~!::.'.::- '-'- -, - -.-.:: ~_'..,~.: , - - I --~_:~:~~¿ <~:¿~/k~:~~~ /; ",. ... ~ --.- ¿~L ~ =J~~.=. ---~ý ~ ~,// ~:.~;¿ n~ ,. / . OK) 'J/ . .@ . . .' ,/et ;;/;I¡, , . . . .', 7 ", ,... )/" .':;.?" .>:4- -- -://.." C....::J!:Lá.c-·k-v'1_-. /' . , ./ .. '- - .' - ..:. ". - . . .. .. .,..., . ".¡ ../... ._·0· ',':;'<ê;"'::;" ......_.. ,,':'-,,-__ ___ .__._ I ~~.~~~,~.__. .---.----~~/2 .=_6'~__,.._~~ðC_~:~.---- ,;' ,:" - ,/' " , ,.' / ~I:.:f/:"~<,·. _~.:~-=-_ -----,---------,, ._.'_' ..:~-=--=-_~. .-.:..-_,~--'--_______..____......:...-----......--,~ I dk ~~=_~~/:~~~~~~-__ ~ IK.cd.u: ~-:.:_ /~~1 ~ß{¿";'~ J..' ¿:(: '. ....6... d~<~:~-:.:__.:.::-;:::.·_...__.,;.:.y.(.r..~_¿:~_ '":::.:!--f~(!~"::/~=.ÇL_ I --. _d'__._. -, .- I ---.-...-...... 1__. t'----------~-.---------- I C'~ '-r-l~ ., "._ ·_._~_ø.._.______ ...___._.~,__. --.. ~---...................-.. ._..~..~...-....-.~~~.............................. .......-.._- .. #' --. ," .... ~.....'.....,¡.... ..........-,...............-.,-.-..--.- -~ '....-.- .- -... ,'-.. ..-.... --..-.. --.--......--.....".---.-.--. -,- ....'.............._J_. ," . '''--.....-, ..~..,...,...._,.".-4... .._~ _...___ ........ _ -.... - -- -...- - ......--.....-.......- ............_~..---- _._.._...-............-.....................-----..-.~.-.....-........._-~........-........~_._..~-............ ............... .......I~ ._'-,..........-.._..._..--~.~--..---------.--- .-......-.-.-.'....-.- -...-.....,'-..-... ~_..._.. ~-.. .- -,-.'.. ......-......... ....~......-~...... .. ...~ao. .,,_.. .._......_ ,_... _..__._..._ _...~- _~"._ ......~...... .....~..........--.-.....- ------.--.-..-.-.-..... ~----.......................- -.-.. .. . -...-._~- .-...-.-.,. .... .1·....-............---.'1 .._.~~...._....... ., -~--~_._-_..._....... '''___ .ø....._____-..,. _"_.._. ~ i .--.- - ~-- . ------.--.£ ~7~gL~~.~_....~e_il-h~~~~ ' ~'. . Gq~_?: -:_.fj~-...--.L:L(d"~--i~___._ .' 1?~]-4~ 1i¿"2!z~.~-.<-::, .. 6 - if- JY . . .. (771. C:::{"' ~ž¿ ~ <.. . . . _ .. _... _ ._. ..'...,. 'Y/:,~ z/ ". ,..·,,!-----'--,!;~i.[¿·,,;~-¿¿_I2 ? - 7- S:.5·· 670) ~<"," .~:;;~<_. _ ..[._a..>~:¿.. ... . ····_.._-(~··I;_·;·y··_-_···-:~_..:- ) '/J~ ~ ---'~~'h_._----_._......._L... ...--......----..Æ1-_......,~¿p(.f!~ Gt __H' ._.~/L.= ýL_g~¿:¡Jj'"~W,~~___ (.~( /~. f S-.. ðv! "2-¡;~6o:?..G./~C Cf/T '" -'. t .-=// - 9:.J=."..ttà~~. e./-:...._... &', -./1 '. (¡S·-=.._f1-5;$_çJ~~-;~~..~___ t -/1 --Ó). 8//j£J~~£~~-"'0f~..- ~. . f; ;//~'''-'-¡~~C?:-Lþ_~ Ä (J4~...- ~.--~-.~.--~_.: ---'.-~'----~~'-~:'.'~. ". ' .' '. - ~ ~.. ~:~~~(({;.~- /f:.£.4d.~~.___...__0_-.:__!,¿:~_=ðS- . R~/~ .iliA'(.ftJ.i:~:··"?t:~u .-:(¿.~ ~ ~~. . b 1/ - P"~ ~ . .~~~,"--~---' ...----.-.;.~--.._- - ~~. - -~;j~ -~~£;;(()-ll---.. ~ . ...- -1~. J . -- ---t--:i~''''l: . '¿"-'ç 4-0-; _'. ~~. '~" ,/~- '--\ . ." Y.. 1 0 ...ljd , JOT ~ _. ---- - - .,.,.. .-.-, ;ø£ - .1,;L~..._._-__~ =./L__F~_ 7~~O . ~~~M~._... 1¢j~.·,.~<:1¿~ b:_~._.__..__.__._._..:..~:::..!/ ~.¿~~:._.__.. 7¿) /¿.AiJf¿~ _d_~_. ~. ¡....~.. .~-~~~-~-.~/~..~~~~ ~\~~..~.:~~-~-- ~~..¢~"":':::~ ___? - /f ~ 6 ~ C~--:fJV7~J:),,:~, ""'.f'~4,", ~~ .. 1...114:. .¿~¿v:rl..__Ia_..~_j.I_.-=-fj-__._.8- <!~ ()_Y~~ß'/l~~d/l . I" I Ie I I I I t -/,5'- )-I~- 3.~ ,:¿ / Date:- ~ Case: PZ ~85~68 & 85..69 We object to the rezoning of said tract in PZ85-68 to R-3 for the following reason; To: City Council City of North Richland Hills An R-3 designation will adversely affect the property values of residents nearby where classification is R-2 We also object to the reclassification of property in PZ85-69 to C-1 for the following reasons: This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health. convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. SIGNlTURE . DATE ADDRESS ~ _·~.I " (,-/J-YS 1,r :/ ',¡JLfTO: City Council Dùt'":- ~ I ~ tl Ci ty of North Richland IIills C:¡;::;'2: P¿ _:~~=~~ 2.; I~~ ;';1 ::a~~~;ct to the rezoning of said tr<1ct in P:;;U5-¡j8 to ì{-3 for t]¡r: followir~C] ;J '~l An R-3 designation will adversely élffcct the pt'opc:rty vül'1c:'s of ~D~ fJ residents nearby where classH-icatioll is H-2 I ~;"d)°r, í'le also object to the reclassificat i on of pi of)erty in P7.f~~;-(;') Lo C-1 -1 \1~\tY<"\ for the fO~101tJÌng ~easons: 0.. I / "~.;t] ThJ.s r~zonl.ng 1tJould not be.coJ.1<iuctlve to publlC SLl!:eL:/., ¡.lf~altl1, ~ el1 ~ ,1-' convenlence, comfort, prosIY~n_ty, or tjeneral welfùcc of tÌ1'~ ~. present neighborhood. 1'1·'\' SIGNITUR~ .. DNI'E 1\[JDHE;J,; ~'ðJt~~ , (;1;~fç ;1:7;; I _..' ;ß.~(l1(fiQ b-IO-~- ?l:)s-.s~yhIQQke I .J ~.D~~/~:\ h ~- ~ I: -/~ ~ ~ I~ ~7;; J:;j ~f'. I ~,9- ~C-<-¿-Z-y t -/ò - %S- 61-//6 ~a~<-0uAA7 ~ lG- !t-1/ C; -/O-~' I ~-~L:~2' -J¿. L (j- ~~ ~: ~I~~_ ~;~: ~';.~~~:~=C~:., .' ~.~ ~.-~-~ - / I I -"----_0_- -...- - --- I I I t' I -----.-------.. .. -.................... .... f)~~ /.J:Jl;d I~b~ --------------. ,þ..,. ..--- .--..... ~ .- -.:L--_ .._~~,.__.__~_~__.,_________._.. _ _. . ~-~.._---_...._.-..-_--~.. ........ . ........ þ.-.----.--- -""'" -...... ............-. '"-- ~....-.---.- ,...--- ... , I" . .". I To: City Council City of North Richland Hîlls {-/5-15" ~.' Þ I Date:- ~ Case: PZ -85-68 & 85-69 for the following We object to the rezoning of said tract in PZ85-68 to R-3 reason; I An R-3 designation will adversely affect the property values of residents nearby where classification is R-2 We also object to the reclassification of property in PZ85-69 to C-1 for the following reasons: This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present neighborhood. I SIGNlTURE DATE ADDRESS ~---f+I-7:-' --.----- " · ~~. t...~ /, 2::l:¿ . .,/ I ~~~_~l,~:;~ ~'-;; ~~ -.-_.~~~~ ~~ ''''';~ .kJ/l·' ./' ./' -, ~.:-O ... ..,' /. ,.- ',..-.. ._._-~...::..._...- - -.'.. .' ._..,~.;"..~~-,,--~.... ""':';.,..-.._-~'.......,.._......;,.;,~~ .,- 1'- '~.~.) --.' , ...I~. ~ ,. " -:. .. '-. .''::::; ,....~: ",' -. --- ~ ..- ~. \ _ . .~ . _ . "1'-" ___~ ( __\" " \. ) ",,' ......, . -. .../. ...... I .-, . ..,..,.; ( ._ _'__.. _ ..~__- ,'~~_-:__:.'_. _..:...'.~:j.~' ...:_....... ".~ (' _--.._--~-~~~,...:..-_~-----~--~-_.. .:'::,-:'0_----, ..._...____.\,~_.. .':',::,__.. .;;._..;;:.::......___ _ _'.- ~___ "--...:. "-- Ie-----··-·---------· ----. _.-., --.. _.. ..... ...----..-.....- -...._-.. - ----.-----.- I I ~-.....-...~.-......þ...i.~.........--............... ~., ~,.-~- ....... ""- ........... .. ~ ~ - ... - .... _. -- - . .. 4.... '_..~. ~.;. _. ....... .,'~ .......... .......-...~.... -' ~-........._._..,~.,,.~ _..... ._-- ... _..... .-....... - ,....,.. - ....., ,~."~ ............. ---........... ~..............._~(........~........-. .._~ ."'.~~. I"'''''., \.. ,.-,...~ ~'....""', .......~...--r.o..~.... I I --- ..- -.-._-.-. - -, ..- .... ....... . -- . ....... ---- -... ..... -# #" ..-. ....-.. - -... --.. ......~. --',.. -.. ..... ... . ".-..r-~--..... '.'"'''~'',., "-,' ,... .111 ~. -..__. _...,............,'-' ............"''''''a--......................... ...~'.......~_............,............ .._._.~._......-. - -...........-.--..-- -'--"--".'" . . - ..--.~.. .-...................",.... -..---................................... ...-......:........................~~........,......-....~....._---..... ""'""" --.. -- .............. ..-..... ......--.-......._.....,.,.-...~~ ---------.._--...._--....,~-..-"..."..,.... - .....,....- .... ......-.., '. ", - . 't· ___... ....~,....~__.._......._-_. _____._.._._..--_-...___~_...__ _.......~... ~~....._~.. I ---.-- '--...... ..------ ---.--.__.__.. _ I I I t' I .- -- - _. -- -....- - _.. - -- ---- ---- ---. ... - ... . _. .. ..- .. ~,--~...- ._.... ---... ~--- ......'--...-- ---.................". _...........~-._.. ...' - .....~................ ..........- --.............---~~---...-..... ------..-.. -~_._-_._---_..._---._._._,...... -- --.-----..-.-----,. "M ............ ".........________..~ _.......~............_,,~. --._ -----~..._----------- ---" ...- ----------.---..--- ... -_......~. - .... ,". ..........' .....~.................... .......~. ...--------.-... . ..................................----~,.".,-..........._... --......-.-............ ..... .-.-. .....-....,........ ~.,........-... ............~.::--.......--.'........_---....-......... lOr.&.. . -...---- - ..-............--....----.......---... .~.~----~~~ I~ I f' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I ORDINANCE NO. 1271 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-68 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-3. BEING a tract of land situated in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being part of the E. A. Cross Survey, Abstract 281, and the William Cox Survey, Abstract 321, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of the E. A. Cross Survey and being the Southeast corner of said tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 36 minutes West a distance of 270.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 01 degrees 12 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 733.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 36 minutes East a distance of 270.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 01 degrees 13 minutes West a distance of 505.30 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 01 dF-grees 12 ~inut£:s West é. distance of 277. 70 feet to the point of høeinnin q ann "0'" 1-., i.~; T'I: I. c; I. ? <; i'1 ere ~ - = :'.::.:::1, ~~::-~ or les;:;. I' I {' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 This property is located east of Davis Boulevard and bounded on the east by Stonybrooke Addition. DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1985. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-85-68 IS HEREBY REZONED R-3 THIS 26th DAY OF AUGUST, 1985. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF NOR:£H RICHLAN-D HILLS ~ CITY.F NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: 2/10/86 Council Meeting Date: Subject: Request of Earl McKinney, Trustee to Rezone a Agenda Number: PZ 85-69 Portion of Tract 1 and IB, E.A. Cross Survey, Abstract 2~I and Tract 3 Wm. Cox Survey Abstract 321 from AG to C-I ORDINANCE NO. 1272 This Zoning Application is presented on the vacant tract located alon~ the east side of Davis Boulevard north of Odell Street. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to C-1 Commercial. The purpose for the proposed rezoning is to allow the applicants to develop a commercial center. The Staff noted to the Commission that this property had previously been requested for Commercial Zoning. At that time the request covered a total of 15 acres. That previous request was denied by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. The current request has been reduced to 10.5 acres in size. The remaining acreage has been proposed for residential zoning in Zoning Application PZ 85-68. At the Commission hearing a large contingent of citizens from the Stoneybrooke and Odell areas ðppeared in opposition to the requested rezoning. A petition was also filed which did not contain sufficient signatures to require a three-fourths vote of the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of Zoning Application PZ 85-69 ~ requesting rezoning of a portion of Tract I and 1B, E.A. Cross Survey A-281, and Tract 3, Wm. Cox Survey Abstract 321 from AG to C-l. This hearing before the City Council is in appeal of that denial. ~ I I Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I I Rll/~ I City Manager . Finance Director ent Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1