The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1986-02-24 Agendas I·· I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 24, 1986 - 6:30 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. PW 86-6 Discussion of Contract on Sewer Study (Agenda Item No. 23) (Gene Riddle) 2. Discussion of Comprehensive Master Plan 3. Discussion of Historical Projects of Sesquicentennial Committee 4. PW 86-7 Appraisal of Parcels of Land for Watauga Road Right-of-Way (Agenda Item No. 24) (Gene Riddle) 5. PU 86-8 Eminent Domain Proceedings for Drainage Easement (Agenda Item No. 20) (Rex McEntire) 6. PW 86-5 Approval of Street Reconstruction by Tarrant County Precinct 3 (Agenda Item No. 22) (Gene Riddle) I,· I I I I 1 I I I I II I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 7. Other Items 8. *Executive Session to Discuss Land, Personnel, and/or Litigation *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law I," I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FEBRUARY 24, 1986 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER 1. ITEM Call to Order ACTION TAKEN 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting February 10, 1986 5. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda- 6. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by Asterisk (11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 24, & 25) 7. PZ 85-148 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - .Request of Double B Development Company to rezone Lot 3R, Block F, Richland Oaks Addition, from R-1 Single Family to LR (Local Retail) (Located on the west side of Strummer Drive immediately south of Grapevine Highway) 8. Ordinance No. 1341 9. PZ 86-2 Request for an Appeal Hearing on PZ 86-2 ·1· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 10. PZ 85-69 Possible Reconsideration of PZ 85-69 *11. PS 85-80 Request by Richmond Bay Development Inc. for Replat of Block 9, Meadow Lakes Addition (Located on the north side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive) *12. PS 86-1 Request of Jim Warren and Carey Beck for Replat of Lot 3R, Calloway Acres Addition (Located on the west side of Parchman Street north of Grapevine Highway) *13. PS 86-3 Request of Hanson Properties for Replat of Lots 7R, 8R, and 9R, Block 3, Nob Hill Addition (Located on Lombarq Street) 14. SO 86-2 Request of May Advertising to Locate a Billboard Sign on Northeast Loop 820 West of Edison Drive 15. SO 86-3 Request of Alan Young Buick for Variance to Section 4.1(b) of the Sign Ordinance 16. SO 86-4 Request of Richland Hills Church of Christ for Variance to Sign Ordinance Section 4.1(b) and 4.2(b) I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *17. GN 86-15 Request of Floortime Inc., for City of North Richland Hills Release of Utility Easement on East Property Line of Lot AR-1, Calloway Addition, Resolution No. 86-10 *18. PU 86-6 Bid Award to Industrial Disposal for One Tymco Sweep in the Amount of $68,510.00 *19. PU 86-7 Approval of Condemnation of Mr. and Mrs. Paul D. Learned for High tower R.oad Righ t-of-Way, Resolution No. 86-11 *20. PU 86-8 Eminent Domain Proceedings for Drainage Easement *21. PU 86-9 Request to Deny Biq for Lighting at Richfield Park *22. PW 86-5 Approval of Street Reconstruction by Tarrant County Precinct 3 *23. PW 86-6 Proposed Sewer Rate Increase and New Proposed Contract for Sewer Transportation and Treatment with the City of Fort Worth *24. PW 86-7 Appraisal of Parcels of Land for the Watauga Road Right-of-Way I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'l . Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *25. PAY 86-13 Pay Estimate HI and Final for Storm Drain Improvements in Smithfield Acres 26. Citizen Presentation 27. Adjournment I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I (' I City of J(ðrth Richland Hills, Texas MEMORANDUM February 24, 1986 TO: Rodger Line, City Manager Richard Royston ~ Director of Planning and Development FROM: SUBJECT: Comprehensive Master Plan The last two documents needed to complete the Compilation of the Comprehensive Master Plan for the City are now available for City Council review and consideration. 1. Some time earlier we had provided to the City Council a draft of the revised Analysis and Plan Policy statement text for the Master Plan. We requested at that time that the Council review the text and suggest any changes they felt appropriate. Although some individual comments were received no general discussion and critique was ever accomplished. I have incorporated those comments which I have received and have completed a typographical editing of the document. The text is available and additional copies can be provided to the Council as needed. 2. Comprehensive Land Use Map: We have received the corrected color reproductions of the Land Use Plan. I have reviewed this map again for compliance with the current Zoning Ordinance. There are several minor items which still must be resolved on the map. However, the majority of these items are graphic rather than textural. a) The map registration, that is the match between color overlays, is slightly off producing a number of white line areas between colors. b) In the overlays noting proposed uses a screen pattern was used. The reproduction of that screen is not sharp, making the differentiation between existing and proposed uses in some colors difficult. (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118 I Ie I c) There are at least four areas noted on the map without a color, seeming to indicate proposed Agriculture use. These are in error and apparently occurred when a pattern was not provided on the original artwork. I d) As stated these needed changes are mostly graphic details. I believe the major problems of the earlier draft have been corrected. If we can have the City Council's comments on both items we can proceed with the assembling of a published Plan. I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I , I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I f I II I' Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I- I February 10, 1986 Page 2 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 27, 1986 APPROVED Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of January 27, 1986. Motion carried 7-0. 5. REMOVAL OF ITÐf (S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilwoman Moody removed Item #40, Mayor Pro Tem Davis removed Item #31 and Mayor Echols removed Item #43 from the Consent Agenda. 6. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (32, 33, 34, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42, 44, 45, 46 & 47) APPROVED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. 7. PZ 85-59 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING _ REQUEST OF RICHLAND HILLS CHURCH OF CHRIST TO REZONE A PORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 25, SNOW HEIGHTS ADDITION AND TRACT 2B, W. W. WALLACE SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1606, FROM U (INSTITUTIONAL) AND R-7-MF (MULTI-FAMILY) TO C-1 (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LOOP 820 EAST OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone Wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Ray Fulenwider, 7601 Hightower, representing the Church of Christ, appeared before the Council. Mr. Fulenwider stated that this property consisted of five and one-half acres located east of the present church which was presently zoned R-7 (Multi Family) on 1.9 acres and the remainder was zoned U (Institutional). Mr. Fulenwider stated this request was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 13, 1985 and was denied. Mr. Fulenwider stated that prior to the Planning and Zoning meeting they had written all of the neighbors and talked to many of them by telephone and discussed the plans. Mr. Fulenwider stated they were surprised at the June 13th meeting because they felt they had resolved most of the objections. Mr. Fulenwider stated there had been major changes since that meeting: 1) the church had sold its two main buildings to the city for a library/recreation center and other uses; 2) the I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I ~ February 10, 1986 Page 3 new Thoroughfare Plan designated Vance Road to be extended to IH 820 and would give the neighborhood access to IH 820 and relieve the traffic congestion in the area; 3) the church had granted the city a public access easement for Redondo to IH 820 to further help circulation; and 4) the Church was developing other streets in the Meadow Lakes Area to relieve traffic congestion on Rufe Snow. Mr. Fulenwider stated the need was much greater for commercial zoning than the MF (Multi-family) and U (Institutional) that it was presently zoned. Mr. Bob Hamm, 6201 Riveria, appeared before the Council. Mr. Hamm stated one of the main concerns of the Planning & Zoning Commission was increased traffic on Rufe Snow. Mr. Hamm stated he believed the zoning of C-1 on the property would be of help. Mr. Hamm stated that on their new site Colonial Parkway would be extended to enable the traffic to go to IH 820 and avoid getting on Rufe Snow. Mr. Hamm stated he felt the property in question was ideal for a strip center and they would be willing to restrict the zoning to exclude high-rise office buildings, hotels/motels and hospitals. Mr. Charles Owen, 6425 Martin, appeared before the Council. Mr. Owen stated they had a MAl Appraiser look at the property and give suggestions for the use. Mr. Owen stated there were two possible economical uses: a multi-story office building and single story light commercial. Mr. Owen stated the MAl's opinion was the property was better suited for single story light retail. Mr. Owen stated that market conditions indicate there was an over abundance of office space in the metroplex area and area investors were hesitant to commit funds for additional office sites. Mr. Owen stated that as far as the impact on abutting residential property there was no measurable difference between quality retail development and quality office development on property abutting residential neighborhoods so long as they were physically and psychologically separated. Mr. Ray Fulenwider, 7608 Hightower, reappeared before the Council. Mr. Fulenwider presented the following c'omments: Mr. Jack Roseberry felt it was a reasonable request and it would benefit the neighbors and the City; Doctor Kirby Williams felt it made good sense for the City to develop light commercial zoning along major streets to serve the community and better separate the tax base; Mr. John Hawkins felt commercial zoning was needed to balance out the development of the fast growing area; Dr. Elroy Cantrell felt the city needed to develop light commercial zoning to help the large residential area; and Josh Davis felt this was a reasonable and sensible zoning request. Mayor Echols called for anyone Wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Mr. Ernest Hedgecoth, owner of property at 7001 Corona, appeared before the Council. I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I February 10, 1986 Page 4 Mr. Hedgecoth stated he had been asked by 29 of the 31 property owners who lived within 200 feet of the property and opposed this request to represent them. Mr. Hedgecoth stated that all of the speakers who issued the comments did not live within 200 feet of the property and they were not going to have to live with the zoning. Mr. Hedgecoth stated they opposed the request for several reasons: 1) reduced property values; and 2) increased traffic, noise and trash problems that would be generated by Local Retail zoning. Mr. Hedgecoth stated that all operations were objectionable and they would like for the property to be zoned 0-1. Mr. Hedgecoth stated they would like to ask that a six foot masonry fence be required on the property. Mr. Hedgecoth respectively asked the Council to deny the request. Councilwoman Moody asked Mr. Hedgecoth if the neighborhood group had met with the Church and tried to work the 0-1 zoning out. Mr. Hedgecoth stated yes, that it had been mentioned. Councilwoman Moody asked if the request was denied how would they feel about having apartments on the property. Mr. Hedgecoth stated they wouldn't like it, but they could live with it. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if Mr. Hedgecoth was in favor of Vance Road being extended through to the north. Mr. Hedgecoth stated, personally, no. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the Church was willing to place restrictions on the C-I zoning and if there were negotiations between the Church and the property owners, were there other restrictions in C-I that they could possible live with. Mr. Hedgecoth stated they would consider negotiations if the Church would consider 0-1 zoning. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if a strip center would be satisfactory if there was a six foot masonry fence. Mr. Hedgecoth replied no. Mayor Echols advised that the City Council could either deny or approve the request, any other type of zoning would have to go back to the Planning & Zoning Commission. Councilman Fisher asked if they were not concerned about a high rise office building being built on the property. Mr. Hedgecoth stated they would not be pleased, but it would be better than a strip center. Councilman Ramsey advised that restrictions could be placed on the C-I zoning. I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I February 10, 1986 Page 5 Attorney McEntire stated he hoped all parties involved realized that this could possibly not be the final say-so because if it was taken to the District Court they could zone it C-I without any restrictions. Councilman Ramsey stated that he felt there was room for compromise and he thought the Church, the homeowners, and a councilperson should meet and try to work the situation out. Mr. Hedgecoth stated that he would be willing to negotiate with the Church. Councilman Ramsey stated the request could be tabled and an agreement worked out. Attorney McEntire stated that the Mayor should conclude the Public Hearing and reconvene the meeting after- negotiations. Mr. Jim Cato, 6729 Corona, appeared before the Council. Mr. Cato stated that his main concern with the commercial zoning was increased traffic westbound on Corona. Mr. Cato stated Vance Road had been on the City's Thoroughfare Plan since the mid-60's and was not in a new development in this case. Mr. Cato stated he recognized the city could put limitations on the building heights but he would like to ask if the city had the prerogative to delete uses allowed under the city's Zoning Ordinance. Attorney McEntire stated they could delete uses allowed in the City's Zoning Ordinance. Mayor Echols granted rebuttal t~me. Mr. John Michiner, 2513 Norwood, Attorney for the Church, appeared before the Council. Mr. Michiner stated consideration ~hould be given to what was the best use for the property. Mr. Michiner stated he felt that the traffic would be reduced with this type of zoning. Mr. Michiner stated that he would like to work out a compromise with the neighbors if the Church could be assured of coming back before the Council within one month. Mr. Michiner stated they would be willing to restrict the zoning. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 8. ORDINANCE NO. 1255 APPROVED Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to appoint Mayor Pro Tem Davis representative to meet with the homeowners and the applicants to work out a compromise and come back to the Council no later than March 24th or come back in two weeks if something was worked out. II· ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I February 10, 1986 Page 6 Mayor Echols called a Recess. RECESS BACK TO ORDER Mayor Echols called the meeting back to order with the same present as recorded except Gene Riddle. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve Ordinance No. 1255 with the following stipulations: no high-rise office buildings, no hospitals, no hotel/motels, a 6 foot masonry fence be required along the entire south line, indirect lighting not to shine in residential property owners' yards to the south, a free standing building be allowed in front of the strip center facing Loop 820 only on the parcel that would be on the west side of Vance Road extension, and no separate free standing building be allowed (one strip center allowed) on the east side of Vance Road extension. Motion carried 7-0. 9. PZ 85-68 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING _ REQUEST OF EARL MCKINNEY TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACTS 1 AND 1B, E.A. CROSS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 281, AND A PORTION OF TRACT 3, WILLIAM COX SURVEY, ABSTRACT 321 FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD NORTH OF ODELL STREET) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Delbert Stembridge, Engineer, representing Earl McKinney, appeared before the Council. Mr. Stembridge stated this propertý was adjacent to R-3 zoning on the south and R-2 zoning on the east. Mr. Stembridge stated they planned on constructing a street through to Davis Boulevard which would help alleviate traffic on Odell and Stonybrooke. Councilwoman Moody asked if they would consider 1600 square foot houses. Mr. Stembridge replied yes. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Mr. V.L. Gibson, 8333 Odell, appeared before the Council. Mr. Gibson stated he was opposed to this request because the houses would not be the same type that were in Stonybrooke and it would also create more traffic. I ~ I I I I I I I . 1 I I I I I I f I February 10, 1986 Page 7 Councilwoman Moody stated the houses would be the same as in Stonybrooke only the lots would be smaller. Mr. Don Chaille, 8405 Timberline, spokesman for the Stonybrooke area, appeared before the Council. Mr. Chaille stated he strongly opposed R-2 houses on R-3 lots. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 10. ORDINANCE NO. 1271 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 1271 with the stipulation of 1600 square foot houses. Motion carried 7-0. 11. PZ 85-69 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING _ REQUEST OF EARL MCKINNEY, TRUSTEE, TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACTS 1 AND 1B, E.A. CROSS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 281 AND A PORTION OF TRACT 3, WILLIAM COX SURVEY, ABSTRACT 321, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO C-1 (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD NORTH OF ODELL STREET) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Delbert Stembridge, Engineer, appeared before the Council. Mr. Stembridge stated that this pr~perty was bounded by commercial on the north and west. Mr. Stembridge stated that Davis Boulevard was a major thoroughfare and you would not want to build a home that backed up to Davis. Mr. Stembridge stated he felt the highest and best use for the property was commercial. Councilman Kenna asked if a sight barring fence on the south and east would be installed. Mr. Stembridge replied yes. Councilwoman Hinkle asked if there would be no access to the residential areas from the property. Mr. Stembridge replied no. Mr. Stembridge asked the Council for rebuttal time. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. I' ~ I I I 1 I I I . I I I I I I I r I February 10, 1986 Page 8 Mr. V.L. Gibson, 8333 Odell, appeared before the Council. Mr. Gibson stated that commercial zoning would increase traffic and devalue property in the area and he felt it should be zoned residential. Mr. Gibson stated there was already enough commercial in the area and this would not be in the best interest for the city. Mr. Gibson asked that the Council vote against this request. Mr. Don Chaille, 8405 Timberline, appeared before the Council. Mr. Chaille stated it would devalue his property and he felt additional commercial in the area was not needed. Mayor Echols granted rebuttal time. Mr. Stembridge reappeared before the Council. Mr. Stembridge stated that Mr. Chaille's property backed up to existing commercial and was not within 200 feet of this request. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated there was an existing 15 foot easement along the south line of the property. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated there was a possibility a drainage channel would be put there and asked how wide the easement would be. Mr. Stembridge stated the Master Drainage Plan called for a 20 to 30 foot concrete channel. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that Mr. Stembridge would be required to erect a sight barring fence. Mr. Stembridge stated he was aware of the requirement for the fence. There being no one else wishing to ,speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public hearing. 12. ORDINANCE NO. 1272 DENIED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle to approve Ordinance No. 1272. Councilman Ramsey stated he felt the residential area was being encroached upon and he did not believe that commercial would be the best use. Motion failed 4-3; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilman Newman, and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for and Councilwoman Moody, Councilmen Ramsey, Kenna and Fisher voting against. I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I February 10, 1986 Page 9 13. PZ 85-135 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING _ REQUEST OF T.J. PETROLEUM, INC. TO REZONE TRACT A, BLOCK 22, CLEARVIEW ADDITION FROM C-2 (COMMERCIAL) TO C-2-SU-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION (LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND BIRCHWOOD DRIVE) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Ms. Melinda Watts, Attorney, representing Mr. and Mrs. Inglis, appeared before the Council. Ms. Watts stated that they requested to sale beer off premises for economical reasons. Ms. Watts stated the other service stations in the area already sold beer for off premise consumption. Ms. Watts stated that since the Inglis request had been denied three other zoning requests in the area had been granted to sell beer. Ms. Watts asked for rebuttal time. Mayor Echols called for anyone Wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Dr. M.S. Satyanarayana appeared before the Council. Mr. Satyanarayana stated he was concerned with the litter on his property, vandalism and the increase in traffic. Mayor Echols granted rebuttal time. Ms. Watts stated that by keeping one business from selling beer would not keep Mr. Satyanarayana's property ~lean and it would not cause that much of an increase in traffic. Mayor Echols asked in whose name the permit would be issued. Ms. Watts~replied the permit would be issued in the name of Tommy Inglis. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 14. ORDINANCE NO. 1339 APPROVED Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Kenna, to approve Ordinance No. 1339, permit to be issued in the name of Tommy Inglis and non- transferable. Motion carried 7-0. I- ~ I I I I I 1 I . I I I I I I I f I February 10, 1986 Page 10 15. PZ 85-144 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING _ REQUEST OF DIAMOND GLENN JOINT VENTURE TO REZONE PART OF TRACT 2A1, 2A2, 2A2A AND 2A3, M. LYNCH SURVEY, ABSTRACT 953 FROM R-8 (ZERO-LOT-LINE) TO LR (LOCAL RETAIL) (LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DAWN DRIVE AND GLENVIEW DRIVE) Councilman Kenna asked to be excused because of possible conflict of interest. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone Wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Grady Payne appeared before the Council. Mr. Payne stated there was local retail located on the property on the north and east side of this property in question and requested the Council to approve the zoning request from Residential to Local Retail. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 16. ORDINANCE NO. 1340 APPROVED Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve Ordinance No. 1340. Motion carried 6-0. 17. _ PZ 85-149 PLA~mING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF BRANIX INCORPORATED TO REZONE LOT I, BLOCK 31, COLLEGE HILL ADDITION FROM C-1-SU-BEER TO C-I-SU-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION (CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP) (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AT SMITHFIELD ROAD) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Earl Nix, Vice-president, Branix Inc., came before the Council. Mr. Nix stated he was purchasing the property and this was simply a change of o~mership. Mayor Echols asked in whose name the permit would be issued. Mr. Nix stated it would be issued in the name of Earl Nix. I- ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I Februry 10, 1986 Page II Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 18. ORDINANCE NO. 1342 APPROVED Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve Ordinance No. 1342, permit to be issued in the name of Earl Nix and non-transferable. Motion carried 7-0. 19. PZ 85-150 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF JOE GRAY TO REZONE TRACTS 3W AND 3Wl, T.K. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1055, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF AMUNDSON ROAD WEST OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. David Barfield, representing Joe E. Gray, appeared before the Council. Mr. Barfield stated they had purchased this property in order to increase the number of lots in Nob Hill Addition. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 20. ORDINANCE NO. 1343 APPROVED Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve Ordinance No. 1343. Motion carried 7-0. I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I February 10, 1986 Page 12 21. PZ 85-151 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF HANSON PROPERTIES TO REZONE TRACT 3C, T.K. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1055, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CRANE ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE EXISTING NOB HILL SUBDIVISION) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. David Barfield, representing Hanson Properties, appeared before the Council. Mr. Barfield that this would also be an extension of Nob Hill Addition. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 22. ORDINANCE NO. 1344 APPROVED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve Ordinance No. 1344. Motion carried 7-0. 23. PZ 85-152 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF CHART DEVELOPMENT Tq REZONE PART OF TRACT lAl, W. D. BARNES SURVEY, ABSTRACT 146, FROM C-1 (COMMERCIAL) TO C-1-SU-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION (LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF STARNES ROAD AND SMITHFIELD ROAD) Councilwoman Moody asked to be excused because of conflict of interest. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Bryan Chandler, representing Chart Development, appeared before the Council. Mr. Chandler stated they planned on constructing a Cousin's Food store. Mr. Chandler stated they had developed 150 convenience stores and had three in the metroplex. Mr. Chandler stated they wished to sell beer for off premise consumption. I I f' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I February 10, 1986 Page 13 Mayor Echols asked in whose name the permit would be issued. Mr. Chandler stated it would be in the name of Bryan Chandler. Mayor Echols called for anyone Wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 24. ORDINANCE NO. 1345 -APPROVED Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve Ordinance No. 1345, permit to be issued in the name of Bryan Chandler and non- transferable. Motion carried 6-0. 25. PZ 85-153 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF RICHMOND BAY DEVELOPMENT TO REZONE TRACT D, BLOCK 1, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION, FROM R-l (SINGLE FAMILY) TO R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MEADOW LAKES DRIVE WEST OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE) Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that if there were no objections they would hear the next three cases together since the applicant was the same and they were all located in the same general area. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing on PZ 85-153, PZ 85-154 and PZ 85-155 and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Marion Massey, Attorney, representing Richmond Bay Development, appeared before the Council. Mr. Massey stated they were requesting R-2 zoning and they planned to have 10,400 square foot lots and 2,000 square foot houses with rear entries. 26. ORDINANCE NO. 1346 APPROVED 27. PZ 85-154 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF RICHMOND BAY DEVELOPMENT TO REZONE TRACT 6, PART OF TRACT 2, W.A. TRIMBLE SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1520, FROM R-6-T PD (TOWNHOME PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) TO R-2 (SINGLE FAMILY) (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MEADOW LAKES DRIVE WEST OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPED MEADOW LAKES SUBDIVISION) -Mr. Massey stated one reason for this request was to clear up the designation of the property. Mr. Massey stated that the zoning classification on the I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I February 10, 1986 Page 14 zoning map was townhouses but it should have been R-l. Mr. Massey stated they were requesting R-2 zoning with 10,400 square foot lots and 2,000 square foot houses with rear entry garages. 28. ORDINANCE NO. 1347 APPROVED 29. PZ 85-155 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF RICHMOND BAY DEVELOPMENT TO REZONE TRACT 5, PART OF TRACT 2, W.A. TRIMBLE SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1520, FROM R-6-T (TOWNHOME PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) TO R-7-MF PD (MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MEADOW LAKES DRIVE AND WEST OF THE EXISTING MEADOW LAKES SUBDIVISION) Mr. Massey stated that when the configuration of Meadow Lakes Drive was changed approximately 1 1/2 acres of property was lost and this request was cleaning up the designation. Mr. Massey stated the unit size on the Planned Development site plan would be 1,000 square feet per unit. Mayor Echols called for anyone Wishing to speak in opposition to PZ 85-153, PZ 85-154 and PZ 85-155 to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 30. ORDINANCE NO. 1348 APPROVED Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 1346 with the stipulation of a minimum of 10,400 square foot lots and 2,000 square foot houses with rear entry garages, Ordinance No. 1347 with the stipulation of a minimum of 10,400 square foot lots and 2,000 square foot houses with rear entry garages and Ordinance No. 1348 subject to a site plan. Motion carried 7-0. RECESS Mayor Echols called a Recess. BACK TO ORDER Mayor Echols called the meeting back to order with the same members present as recorded except Gene Riddle. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I February 10, 1986 Page 15 31. PS 85-92 REQUEST OF ROGER HANSON FOR FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 1-7, BLOCK I, NOB HILL NORTH ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AMUNDSON ROAD AND PRECINCT LINE ROAD) APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve PS 85-92 subject to the engineer's comments and building line along Huntington Square be 25 feet. *32. PS 85-94 REQUEST OF JAMES B. AND DONNA L. HAMM FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 4RA AND 4RB, 6 AND 7, BLOCK 3, INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BROWNING COURT WEST OF WULIGAR WAY) APPROVED *33. PS 85-96 REQUEST OF FENIMORE-FRANKS, INC. FOR FINAL PLAT OF WESTERN OAKS ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BURSEY ROAD WEST OF DOUGLAS LANE) APPROVED *34. PS 85-97 REQUEST OF CROW-NOWLIN ASSOCIATION HI FOR REPLAT OF LOT 2R, BLOCK 4, UNIVERSITY PLAZ.t\ ADDITION (OFFICE COMPLEX SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION ON NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEYLAND DRIVE AND AIRPORT FREEWAY) APPROVED 35. SO 86-1 REQUEST OF RICHLAND MEDICAL CENTER FOR VARIANCE TO SECTION 4.1 OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE AT 3700 RUFE SNOW APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve SO 86-1 as submitted. Motion carried 7-0. *36. GN 86-12 PROPOSED FEDERAL TAX REFORMS, RESOLUTION NO. 86-5 APPROVED I' Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I February 10, 1986 Page 16 37. GN 86-13 PUBLIC HEARING - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS RESOLUTION NO. 86-8 APPROVED Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak to please come forward. Mayor Echols stated there was a reconnnendation from the Staff that the Community Development Block Grant for the 12th and 13th year funding be used to reconstruct Harmonson Road from Dawn Drive to Honey Lane. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve Resolution No. 86-8. Motion carried 7-0. *38. GN 86-14 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT, RESOLUTION NO. 86-6 APPROVED *39. PU 86-4 BID AWARD TO PLAINS MACHINERY FOR ONE BOMAG BW12R PNEUMATIC ROLLER APPROVED 40. PU 86-5 DESIGNATION OF MID-CITIES DAILY NEWS AS THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS "OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER", RESOLUTION NO. 86~7 Councilwoman Moody expressed disappointment as the Mid-Cities being the official newspaper for the city. Councilwoman Moody stated the Mid-Cities only served served about 900 people in the city. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve Resolution No. 86-7. Motion carried 6-1; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilwoman Hinkle, Councilmen Newman, Fisher, Kenna, Ramsey voting for and Councilwoman Moody voting against. *41. PW 86-3 CHANGE ORDER #1 ON MUNICIPAL COMPLEX SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO DECREASE THE CONTRACT BY $15,779.40 APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I February 10, 1986 Page 17 *42. PW 86-4 CHANGE ORDER 82 _ MORGAN MEADOWS EAST DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,175.76 APPROVED 43. PAY 86-8 CONTRACTOR PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATES APPROVED Mayor Echols stated it was the recommendation of the CIP Committee that a more streamline payment system be revised as follows: 1) Partial pay estimates to be approved by City's Administrative Staff based on recommendation from the City's Consulting Engineer or Architect; 2) A monthly status report of all projects to be submitted to City Council; 3) All final pay estimates, and change orders to be scheduled for approval of the City Council. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve Pay 86-8. Mayor Echols stated he did not feel it was right for payments to be made without the public scrutiny available when the council reviewed the pay requests. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he felt the new method provided the Council the opportunity to study the request and that Staff action on the matter would eliminate red tape at City Hall. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the Council did approve contracts in public and there would be a monthly report from the Staff on partial payments and the public would be aware. Councilman Ramsey called for the question. Motion carried 7-0. *44. PAY 86-9 PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE #2 TO WALKER CONSTRUCTION CO., IN THE AMOUNT OF $84,669 _ FLORY STREET IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *45. PAY 86-10 FINAL PAY ESTIMATE #6 TO P & R PAVING, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,298.77 _ HEWITT STREET PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED *46. PAY 86-11 PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE 87 TO LCH CONSTRUCTION CO., IN THE AMOUNT OF $134,222.90 _ MORGAN MEADOWS EAST DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED I I I I I I I , I ---........ I' ~ I I I I I I I . February 10, 1986 Page 18 *47. PAY 86-12 PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE #3 TO COPE CONSTRUCTION CO., IN THE AMOUNT OF $90,144 _ PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE CENTER AND ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER APPROVED 48. CITIZEN PRESENTATION Mr. Ralph Thrasher, Starnes Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Thrasher stated he was speaking on behalf of the American Association of Retired Persons. Mr. Thrasher stated that the group originally met several times at the community center on Glenview before a charge of $15 per meeting was instituted. Mr. Thrasher stated that the group had asked the Parks and Recreation Department to waive the fee but no action was taken when the motion was not seconded. Mr. Thrasher asked the Council to look into waiving the fee for this organization. Councilwoman Moody asked that the Staff cooperate with AARP. 49. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I" I I I ~ ~ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development ubject: 2/24 /86 Council Meeting Date: Request of Double B Development Company to Rezone Agenda Number: PZ 85-148 Lot 3R, Block F, Richland Oaks Addition from R-l to LR ORDINANCE NO. 1341 This Zoning Application is presented on the vacant residential lot located on the west side of Strummer Drive immediately south of Grapeveine Highway. The requested rezoning is from R-l Single Family to LR Local Retail. The applicant's stated intent is to develop the property as a professional office site. The request was made as LR Local Retail due to the size of the subject property. The Ordinance requires that the minimum zoning area in an 0-1 district be one acre. The subject property is not that large and cannot stand alone. The tract can conform to the LR requirement of 20,000 square foot minimum lot area. The Staff noted to the Commission that the subject property is located immediately south of a tract facing Grapevine Highway which is currently zoned C-l Commercial. The subject tract is separated from the residential lots to the south by a dedicated access alley. However, the tract does face existing residences across Strummer Drive. Strummer Drive is not a designated Thoroughfare. With the commercial activity already approved on the south end of the street the addition of this proposed use may cause the already increased traffic activity on the residential street to become a problem for the neighborhood. RECOMM:ENDATION Th~ Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of Zoning Application PZ 85-148 requesting rezoning of Lot 3R, Block F, Richland Oaks Addition from R-l to LR. This hearing before the City Council is in appeal of that denial. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget er Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available \ Rrl/~ City Manager . Finance Director ,-.;.,. CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM .... Paoe 1 of. 1 r I .. - I I , . , , I I I I I I I I , I I I I , I , I , . I : I I' · f \. · I I- I I I I I I . I I I I I I I , I ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, JANUARY 9, 1986 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P. M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Members Don Bowen John Schwinger Mark Wood Joe Hallford Marjorie Nash Carole Flippo Richard Royston Wanda Calvert Alt. Member Dir. Planning/Dev. P & Z Coordinator CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 12, 1985 Ms. Nash made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0 with Mr. Wood abstaining since he was not present at the meeting. 1. PZ 85-148 Request of Double B. Development Company to rezone Lot 3R, Block F, Richland Oaks Addition, from its present classification of R-1 (Single Family) to LR (Local Retail). This property is located on the west side of Strummer Drive, south of Grapevine Highway. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Ronnie Bctler, President of Double B. ~~vc~\.Jl-'Uu:::nt, l.:êuut: J.'-v.Lward. hE:: baiu they plan to build a 6000 square foot office building on this property. Chairman Bowen asked why he did not ask for Office zoning. Mr. Butler stated he did not have enough land; there is a requirement of 1 acre. I' · "" ~, I , I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I Page 2 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 ( r \ Mr. Wood asked what kind of offices they plan to build. Mr. Butler stated they plan to build general offices and may take a small section for their construction business. Alfred Stanford, 5101 Pearl Drive, came forward. He stated he was in favor of this request if it would be an advancement of the area, but he would not be in favor of a liquor store. Chairman Bowen stated there would not be a liquor store there, but a convenience store would be allowed in this type zoning, but they would have to ask for a Specific Use to sell beer. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Norman Davis, 5109 Pearl Drive, came forward. He said he owns this house and has it leased out to a Dwight McCrary. He read a letter In opposition from Mr. McCrary. Mr. Davis stated he was also in opposition to this request. He said this is a nice quiet area a~d he wants it to stay that way. Mr. Davis stated there is a new house being built on Pearl Drive. He stated tb.at St1:;Î:ì"m:~r Driv~ is a block long street and has lots ot traffic. He said with the new shopping center going in at Strummer and Bedford-Euless it would also increase the traffic. Mr. Davis also stated there were thoughtless people who throw beer cans out on Strummer and he objects to this zoning request. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. r< 'J tr I a I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I f I Page 3 P & Z Minutes January 9, 1986 ( PZ 85-148 DENIED 2, PZ 85-149 J~- \ Mr. Wood stated that bit by bit commercial was inching down into the residential area. He said this lot is surrounded by residential on three sides. Betty Hysom requested she be allowed to speak. Chairman Bowen reopened the Public Hearing. Betty Hysom, 5105 Pearl Drive, came forward. She said she was opposed to this request because it would create too much traffic. She said there is a new house being built on Pearl Drive so why couldn't this lot be residential. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. HalJford made the motion to deny PZ 85-14B. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion for denial carried 5-0. Request of Branix, Inc. to rezone Lot 1, Block 31, College Hill Addition from its present classificatio C-1-Commercial-Specific Us ale of Beer for off premise c umption to C-1-Specific Use-S of Beer for off pr~mise consum on (change of ownersh~p) his propsrty is located at ~t~~ tersection of Smithfield Road a~avis Boulevard. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Sid Rratton came forward. He said they wish to purchase this property and get the license changed to their name. He said beer is already being sold there. I' I . I I I I I I I ·Ie I I I I I I I Ie I co KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 19, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PI 85-148 REVIE\J LETTER, ZONING FROM R-l TO LR REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 124 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enclo~ures cc: t1r. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works YMr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 85-1 48 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I, I I I I I I I " I I I I I I I f I OF.DINANCE NO. 1341 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-148 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-1 to LR. BEING Lot 3R, Block F, Richland Oaks Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-172, Page 16, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located on the west side of Strummer Drive, south of Grapevine Highway. DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 9th DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. r6i{()~ ING AN ZONING COMMISSION ?\,A ¿/ CHA N PL c;:?Je-~=-:~;eQ ~, ø~ ~ -I' J~ ~ ~_.,. f~-·--.:~~·'~~-~~7·~- SE~Y PLANNI~ZOÑING ijOMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ- IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF . Mrt7 vi\. ATTEST: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Admin; ~~T~t-i on Council Meeting Date: 2-24-86 Subject: Rpqlle~1- fOT: An AppeA 1 HPqritlg on PZ 86-2 Agenda Number: PZ 86-2 I I I I I I I If Council grants the request for an appeal hearing, the hearing can be heard March 24, 1986. Recommendation: Set date for hearing ~ I I j I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Other _ -, ~ \" ,.( ~-·d./~, ~ A'.Æ ~ ) I t> Department Head Signature I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number SUffi~nt Funds Available (. I nJ ¿JU.y'~/UHæ/ll!¡ City Manager I Finance Director Page 1 of I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: ~dml"1i9tratio" Subject: POfifiible ~e(,o'IJ9id"rat-io'1 or PZ 8"-F;Q Council Meeting Date: 2-?4-Rh I I I I Agenda Number: 1>2 Rt:;-h9 Councilwoman Moody requested that this item be placed on the Agenda for the Possible reconsideration of PZ 85-69 pertaining to Earl McKinney's request for commercial zoning denied at the February 10, 1986 Council meeting. Recommendation: Possible reconsideration of PZ 85-69. I'~ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM -y~~~ City Manager . Finance Director , 1 ~ Page 1 of 1 Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~gferating Budget -z." I-f -I ~ ~Nú/¿"rLf: -~ f!\ ~. [7 Departmé :a~ Signature ' City Manager I - CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: .ubject: 2/24/86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PS 85-80 Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. for Replat of Block 9, Meadow Lakes Addition This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Block 9, Meadow Lakes addition. The property is located on the north side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive. The current zoning is R-2 Single Family. The purpose for the proposed replat is to create residential lots in conformance with the R-2 Single Family District criteria. The plat submitted would create a total of ten lots facing onto Meadow Lakes Drive. In the Thoroughfare Plan Meadow Lakes Drive is designated as a two lane Collector Street and is constructed in conformance with that standard. It is not advisable that residential lots have direct access to the Collector Street. In the Commission's deliberations regarding the zoning on this plat the stipulation was made that all of the proposed lots in this replat be restricted to rear entry garages. The applicant agreed to make this a restriction on the plat. All of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Replat of Block 9, Meadow Lakes Addition with the stipulation that the rear entry garage requirement be included as a condition of the,plat. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Pace 1 of 1. ._____ I . ,. Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I 1-2 94 . --- // /< >/ - ,.,.... )p 0\,' "/ i [ // ,,' 1r- ~i' ..; . '~L /7 ~~\. :,/ :y. : ".,ojî;< /~- .~., \ '// ", ~,~..... I all .'~ . .- '..,// ....~ ~. ~~ ¿;://·~~1..~ r;;-l = / '- _._~ . ,:/// I - 2 ¡ ;c R-7-MF ~~ ~~':' / 1-2 . ,/ / . C-2 r- -C-2-~ su..- ¡ -~.uv. t::: IC- ! C-~T sue U6 ./"" C-2 PSRS--go ./';'/.'.) MEAt>DW LAKES, ~// . ¡ , -~yo -----,:. U- POL.. -10 13, '7 t - 2 ~o"~ cf..~;".~ -: pSgS·gl , //. t'\EADD\N t..A~êS;· _ -t . ~ /~$'~ - ---T-j .....- ,,' L. Si-'>C¡ {3, ~l~,C:' "." ., .~'~~'~". ,'. ~__- ._ 1_,-- . ..-...~ rt ~:.Ø- ~ ý' _ . ~ ~,..J.J ~ -- _:¡.. '. - - ~ ~./ " . / ~ ~ -----d--+ -1 +---- ___ . ....~._ . '-'-0' . -:!''' .~~_., Ii: .1~ '-,..~.~ _ ~ 1('.', ~. \.c, <' / ~ ~.J .r"··~ '" " ~_," Á-;" . - 't,·J'_8:~·· ~. ~... ,/,~./,.----:-~---l~ ~,.~~- ~ ~ .'" /" . ~ l r _.~. ". . ,/ r ~~ '------ª-- i . ~ r- ~ ~ ~'.J ~.'" >ì.. ,.&.~\., .._...~/.~~ _lit ~-~ ~/~- .~~~./.. .~. ..·~··dQ "... ~.. __-= ..)"./~/". '~: [~,- . ,~"" .-' y~\.>./ ~l ~ . ~ ", <~- - . - - -- ~ ~ --.... ~~~.~ ~~ , ,.. --,-~- ~ . ~>.~, '-: . ~;¡.~- '- , . >~'r .~ /~/I''' __ _ . J :-+-- z.~~~ , /~~.J( ~ ..::.:..Ù· 'L' '- ' rJ ' /' ,// v~ .-.1____ C, ¡ ~ ~ - ;ç}..... - -- _' ,,'~' '''''£ . c-~~ -'.....!..r~: ~:-._---..~ ."~' ;, ~i~~~-' ,,:~'" ~:-" ",. .~ =- ~~~~.~~~~ ~~=_~ ..\,ta" ~ . ~:.=-_" " "".....C'j · < - L -=~ f?-:-, -~ =-~ Jr: .__--~.~.~-<~U _r- -~~~_ t'~"1 --k~.;~:.t.·~" :.~.~C " ~L..:':...,..f ~. -"#- - I' _~ ...._-----r.-r..~-~·w : ."'" ~!'-- .'~~" - --- ~;-;-:-¡ L~_C " : ~~~ ------ I' - I : . . ¡LF ! ~ r-- ~ ~ I ( . i ~ r- I i ~ "oc· I .lull i ~ i ~ -...MoL ../ -~ r' ",'" . . .'- ~ c-, .~ I Page 2 P & Z Minutes February 13, 1986 ( Ie I 2. PS 85-80 I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I tt. I PS 85-80 APPROVED 3. PS 85-98 ( Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. for replat of Block 9, Meadow Lakes Addition. Vice Chairman Wood opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this replat to please come forward. Russell Cook with the engineering firm of Worrell and Associates came forward. Vice Chairman Wood said at the zoning hearing, the zoning was approved with the stipulation that the houses have rear entry garages. Mr. Cook said he had no problem with that. He said they do not plan to have an alley, but they plan to run the driveways down the side of the houses to the garages. Vice Chairman Wood called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this replat to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Vice Chairman closed the Public Hearing.. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PS 85-80 subject to the rear entry garages. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Carston Court Partners for preliminary plat of Ca Court Addition. Vice Chairman Wood stated this property is zoned R-1, but over 50% is a deviation from the R-1 zoning. He said 9 of the 16 lots do not meet the requirement for R-1 zoning. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f' I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas November 4, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-912, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MEADOW LAKES ADDITION, LOTS 1 THRU 10 BLOCK 9, PRELIMINARY REPLAT, PS 85 - 80, GRID MAP 120 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before final approval of the replat. 2 A surveyor's seal, certification, and signature should be affixed to the final replat. 3 The size of the proposed water line should be noted on the plat. Also, the proposed water line connection to the existing distribution system should be shown on the plan. We would recommend either boring under Meadow Lakes Drive and connecting to the existing 8-inch water main on the south side, or extending the proposed water line westward along the north Meadow Lakes right-of-way to the existing 12-inc.h 1 ine in Boulder Road. Connections to the existing three 2-inch service lines which cross Meadow Lakes Drive may not provide adequate pressure and flow to the proposed new main if no other connections to the water distribution system are planned. 4 The Water and Sewer Grid Map shows a manhole at the southwest corner of Lot 10 Block 9 with an 8-inch sanitary sewer from the manhole and crossing Meadow Lakes Drive and continuing south along Lariat Drive. This should be verified in the field and shown on the plat if it exists. Although sanitary sewer profiles have not been provided, it might work out better to serve lots 1 through 7 from the existing sanitary sewer line on the north side of Meadow Lakes Drive, and serve lots 8 through 10 with an extension of the existing sewer line in Lariat Drive, if connection to the Lariat Drive line is convenient. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 .. METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I ( -.r-- ~ Subdivision Review Letter continued MEADOW LAKES ADDITION 5 Utility companies should be contacted to determine if any additional easements are required to serve this development. 6 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~ W, R t<u. L IN, P.E. RWA/ra · Enclosures cc: r~r. Rodger N. Line, City t1anager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development November 4, 1985 PS 85 - 80 PAGE 2 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I ~ 3619 Inwood Road I . 1 Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75244 214 / 934-3104 I ( ~ ( WORRELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. engineers · planners November 25, 1985 Ms. Wanda Calvert Planning & Zoning Coordinator CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-912 City of North Richland Hills, Meadowlakes Addition, Lots 1-10, Block 9, Prel iminary Replat ~ 85-80 Ou r F i 1 e: 8105 Dear Wanda: The following is our response to your engineer's comments: 1. The owners acknowledgement and dedication statement and the notary certification will be completed when the final plat is prepared for the referenced project. 2. The surveyors seal certification and signature will be completed when the final replat is prepared and sub- mitted. 3. We have added a 6" line connecting to the existing 8" on the south side of Meadowlakes Drive. 4. We have revised the sewer line to provide service to lots 8,9, and 10 from the existing sewer line in Lariat Drive as recommended. 5. No additional easements are required. We appreciate your cooperation in this matter. If you should have any questions please give me a call. Sincerely, RDC:-jf ~:/;Sb~Tðil Russel D. Cook, P.E. Project Manager . . I I ~ . ~'S § 1&1 III .. ..... CI) N L.t.I O~ ~ .,- en c( )( W ... U. o W ... ~ w :I: ... \.31 \tt: N UNlH: H MYHAND AND SeAL ut· Of F ICE thl~ fhti ( Ñöiørv Puhlic in and for ~ ð t t · · t t t · · · · · · · · · t · , · · , · · · t · · · · · ~: c:: fG: s..: 1-: "': ...¡ .. C CD E CD U) ca w -a c ca >- ca ~i fII- I 2 o i u. .. ..c = .- a:: THE STATE OF TEXAS COÙNTY OF ,; I a¡ i I! gl I .... ¡ I'¡', ~ -8: II :::i :JI =1 Si i ~I >< il ~ f! ! CO! ~ 3î } Úit ~ of (' A. Ü. Hi COU;IfV, Te)l a~'" :~tJ r ¡ : 'f ~ 0: 0: i,I ). : 8 0 co: ~ co: .. z i .!" e ~ I ø» 0 f :t ~ t :i ¡ 1!'¡' c! 8 ¡ if ¡ : ~ :j: .i ¡ õ ~ m ;f~·-r\f~t·l·~::I, J u ~ ð~ Ii> .a i ! : ¡ to- , : ~ : ' ~ f Ij ... ~ ' 'i ¡ , I 0 . . ~ ~ i ¡ : ,:. ! \11 ~N; I: f I W t-'µ : \1, '-.:s " .., J :: .. -I ~ ;: ~ ¡ ~ : :¡OJ 8 ~ ¡ ¡ ~ 1 i )( (I) t : : u " . : : " ~.. - ~ ~ ~j L~:·.\ J"..;þ 'l'1'i i I ~ ¡", ~r; J¡¡j .oJ.' IfJ ... CD 5 ð ~ : <3 oS ~ . S .= <3 . } f , I o o 1 1, II BEFORE ME, the tmderslpd, a Notary Public in WId for said Cotmty WId State, on this day personally lIppIared THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF Tarrant known to me to be the person whose name subscribed to the foregoing instrument, WId IIdcnowledgld to me that he executed the same for the purposes WId consideration therein e...._d. ....&1 ut IAHIWd l - . 8rA1E Of TEXAS r GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE tfiìsl"'lÍIIIfrtlllt~ t........_flUDA!'~ 19 0.. IÑ" It till.......... ......, .. lid - ihlj t '. ~.. II till ...... RecanII at ~ ...... ~ Notary Public in .,dJt(II- ~ -- ~ - . County, Te+s:- AUG 21 1980 . e- ..~ ~~ COUNTY CL£II JNIRAliT COUNTY, IIMI .; (,,~~:f}~) . ",. ¿'.,. BEFORE ME, tIw undersilJ1ed, a Notary .Public in and for said Countv ...d State, on this day penonally ......d .~ ..1_ ~ t e s ' , known to me to be the person Ind offtœr whote name i. su1licnœSYo Q¡ foregoing instruinent WId acknowledged to me that the same was the act of the said W. Brown Cûstom Bu11ders~ Inc. .". c' .~Jj..¿ _. JtXMIXJtìlìxl'KläIIXIiJHlä~tAIMIXEä~ )..;...", .:, -- and that he executed the same as the act of such corporation for the purpo.s and consideration i . . -' d, and in the capacity thers;n stated. G/:~~ '," DE~.MY.~ANO AND SEAL OF OFFICE this the V' /.3' d.y~A. D.t9 80 , .'. . e/ ??t:../ Notary Pu in .,d for Tarrant Coooty, Texas. . J( ~ ~ § ð - ¡ !R~ iii ~:I · · · ;.. ",. ...~ o- X,; .... ... · · · f , J ~ w 4 ~ ð l: > 5 CD 8 VOL 6ge2NsE 1323 .+;'~ ,I I .ni :5IUO, "'iO, t\t1Wr vaiual)!!, Cl~'~ld"'iHIOI1, IIII! lI.!wlIII and :'Utl(;h!JU;Y uf whl(;h IS, ~~I!IY ~CkIlO~led\l:'d, " , '~s In hand Pild by TEXAS E LEt fR fC SERV'r .OMPANY. httremafter calfed Electric Compa,. V( ~s hereby gr..t, b~rga;n, sell and CG'1WV unto sal dEle ctn (; Com pan y an e it\. JI1 1 an ò n IIh t·o f . wav 101 Iho 1:011 Sf rill: lion, rt! .;on 5 . 011. HI..i II Ie n an I)', op" r ;¡ I II III dU 'I! mo v al ,.. ill' Olltnh..arl anclíor unde 9r (lurId t! It! 1:1 II c..1 /rne COIHI stillO of Villi ithlll II ,,"t)l': \ 01 WI rth, 4I1d all 'ii, ':.t. >~al y 0' III!SIf "bit! dPpurlefldrH.:P.S fnciltlal OVt·,ht!ad, underground 01 on 11111 swlaCf) O\I(JI, un dlH , ,JI;ross ill II I upon IhU!iI! O!fI;¡iII I¡¡nds de~ujlll!d ;¡S Tract D, Block I, Meadow lakes Addition to the City of North Rfchland Hills. Tarrant County, Texas, The centerline of the 5 foot wide easemp~t herein granted is d~Sct'ibed as follows: Beginning at a point in the south property lin~ of the above d~scribed tract. said beginning pOint being 2.5 feet westerly measured perpendicularly froln ttl" dfrectfon of the east property line of said tract¡ Thence in a northerly direction 2.5 feet from and parallel to ~he east property 11ne of said tract to a point in the north property line of said tract, Beginning again at a pOint in the east property line of the aÞ~ve described t~3ct. said beginning pOint being 2.5 feet southerly me~sured perpendicularly from the direction of the north property line of said tract; Thence in a westerly direction 2.5 feét ,from and parallel to the north property fine of said tract a distance of 30 feet to a point. t Grentor reCOJlizes that the goneral COurse of said line, as above described is based upon preliminary surveys only, awd he...,., ...... that the e"ment hereby granted shall applV to the ectuallocation of said line when construcœd. G~to{ ~s 10 inform all other parties having a right to construct undergrot.R1d facilities in said easement as to the exiS18nce Ind focation of an~,&B1derground electric facilities construC1ltd by CompanV hereunder. TOIIther with the right of ingress ..,d egress alonga.,d upon said easement and right-of.way ..,d over and across Grentor't 8djoining properties for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, maintaining, operating or removing said line; the right to relOQll elong the seme general direction of said line; the right to reloca_ said line in the same relative position to "'v 8dj~t 'Oed if..,d. such road i. widened in the future; the right to lease wire .~ for the purpore of permitting others to stnng or lav wire along Slid line; the ~,~ pre"",.t exc:avetion for a distance ~~fØt on each side of the actual center of said line; the right to pre\lllnt the construction ó( for a diStance of 2!þet on each saœ of theaçtual œn1ør of said line, any and all buildings, structures or other obstruc. tion. which, in the sole judgn.nt of Electric Com~ .,mav endanger or interfere with the efficiency, safety, and/or convenient operation of said line and its appur1ltnanœs and the right to trim or cut dOIlllrl trees or shrubbery within but not limited to said 5 foot space, to the ex1ønt In the sole jUdgment of Electric Company, as may be neœssary to prevent POSSIble interferenœ with the operation of said line or to remow possible hazard thereto. L. - .¡ TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described easement and rights unto the said Electric £.:.JmpanV, its suc:œ~ors and assiø1s. Iot..wr. - - And , do hereby bind mvalf, mv heirs and legal repre.ntatives, to warrant and forever defend all ...d singular the &boWl de.. cribed e_ment Ind rights WIto the said Electric Comp.,v, its sucœssors 8Qd assi(J1s, against every person whomsoever Iawfuny clåming or to claim the same 0' ...V part thereof. íl ,. , '" I...... ' WITNESS ---....tl!!.......... h. ...d(s) this~_L¡_=.... day of ~--_....Ç}.l...~...-.......c:u;=tó;J..9~¡,~?~¿Lk, ~. ~y AgBnt or ATTEST:,;' ....~...R~.tlU~.--9.~.!.~....'-!!'-~.n:L..._!..._..w. r : . !l1~_.M~.~...APPRÖÿ£O AS ,:~~.::~~~.~~~~~~~~_~.~~~~=~~=~~=~~=~_ -~ 'J~¡:f~~~ ~ -:J -- t VOL 6982NGt 1322 ,__,-1 J~,·-.......,1,,_""""...~..~ .. '. ." . ,_ '_ _ ~ " .,..q~ (i) . I I! b ~ , t_ ... j . I &4. _.r. 41J" lð' ~ f ~~ I ~ 2. ~ ""A.". j r_ ~ : ~~@ ",. .~ -- J'" 1U' ~vvK ~~ : ..Gt .~ ~ ~, .. ~ ~ n. h r- - m ~ ; ~ ~'::.........-:~..,. ¥ .;~:r. , 71!. Z ~ ~ ~ k·.. cßI" I'''· .-.. u. .·"At.. I~ ~ . 0 ~ ~ ~~, ~. . · · ~.. ·'Ib·a .. ".r ...... ~ ~~ ý~ l-. .---- -. .~~- 4'Ð·- ""M ....... !:\ \} ~ ~r 'TIt I'. ~ ~IJ'" ~ c..o~" O~. ~ ~ .~~ ~ "17~ I.,.:·, ,n t .-- ~~ ~ ~I~ I · rj . ~.. . __.' I. II .~ l--Y. ,,~".,. JSQ,~ "'''" .._ ... .---.::í\ .. . ~ '{ ... (,1'. rc; 'JItMo? D .. ~ ~ ! . " tJoJ": ~ ~ r'" ...-.- ""'; . "1' "'E~~ LAUS c~. ../: ." '-' ~ .. ., .. .-..-. K : ' .' 5', I . ,~ ~ \>- l.u :II f-- _ ~. Î\ ' u ...""''' ," r--'-- i---'- ~ / I :~t ....il I J.. J. V ,.' , "..,~ ~ ~ ~. ~' ~~ '.J>. .....~ 1ì .. . \.'t.. f------ Q ~ ~ - ... ... ~ "J -~.- , ~~~ » .. .I, ¡¡ _ ". ~_ ~. II. "," /':'J ~~~~. )0 t ,~,. . ,. , z., ~ '1. ){_ r . ~ ". . .~ r--:---:f--:I-- ~f .' V ~~ ~,~ ~ ._"; ~ _" i. . J . V~t' b·, Ir ~ r-ø-. " 3 q ~..." ~~o~' ~ I. ~ . ~: ~:~ ~ø ~ ~A ,. ,.-,;"~~ - I .. d .., '.. ~ -~. \ ,..... '" ~) Ii" ~ I~ .. ... ~ I. 1&' - ~ 0' ".,~..~"''':. _ iÏ~' U JJ . J\ß~ :..; ~ ,h.. !~8 ~i;- : ::' I ·~~Œ: : "+ 1k~~. f : .. ~ .. ~ ..~ h ,."- -. "iI'~3... ,- .: ~IO 1" II ~ I. . , · ~. «:t ~.~., ~ : ~: ~ 1'. ';" : ~I ~_. " 1 · ~'2 \;- -:; ~ ;'-~18 I ~ J~....~ _1iLa" " r~· ........ ......... ¡. l. I' ..,. - - .. - - - ~-...... "" ~ · & G~'L ~OGE. DR. !' a~ ~ ... II n .. .. .. ... - .. L:- _.. .. . ~., .. ~ ~ltUa ~.~' d J I' ~ ð,: ~ ~~ ~ ~'$ ~ ...., .. .. · I· ... I '. ... ., . ,,~.;,)~.. rfi;~ -- .. ,~ ~ -~ : -^».a , ~..@-! _ _ ... r~~,~1. !! '*~ y,) 6 '~ I ......., ...'- ,t- ." rØ-~; "::";:~"~\1~ c.;-. Ql" rw- t" . N I&. '* J " . ... .. ~ ¿. ~ .. .... ð ~ '; - 4 ~. ~ '2 þI f! "t: tÄ\ ' u_ .., ~.... ,.. ... · .- · - ¡-,.- " II ~~ ~''Æ1t LN. r--:---... -'Ï' i I: 2 . 2 :.. 10 Il··.~IJII''' - '- ~~, c r 7 8 ~ r~ I' '2. ;-w- - ~ I. ~ · II · ., '7. , ~ · ... ~ ': ~ ~ - .. - - - - - æ& s · ,. ~ · ,. I ., 8 I Dr~O RIDe£ ..-.: ". '-'.. -- -, -.. - .. l- - - L ~ .. 4 ~ f;J.r.L~~1~1-~1~4·.~~LJ",:,I::1 ~11=' ~~ ~ ~Þ~A~~:~S_ ~ .J ..J n.. 11..... ~ ~ ao A ¡-J:. CU">'SIDI )t, . .':" J . III ~ IS. 14 IS ~. n.,. r.J. I _ _ ~r ~~'.: ~. ~~.. ; I ",.... ~~ · I ~. I. , e 't;- .::.. ~ _ ~ çJ\' " ~ ¡=~ I . , -.. -..... 10 ~ ~.J _ _ ç ~,"",~'1JJtow r.:' ~~. .~ ~ J - .. ~ ~l"·'.I-~~ ~'" ~ ~rr ZIÞ ~ ,u '~; · ..~. L~ - "'1':' L" ~ _~ '2 ·;,...·1 ~- ~ .- ¡~ , . -nIt' 5:<#«*- ,.. T". ..... .,.K. ,. J "'Ar... " . ~ I ( / ..' -.......,/ :¡r/' ..- TthC. ....... J... '" ..... d~ ,. zc. s.~ TW&O : ...., .. Ir + .- I C . t ~ S I\) o ~ Q) ~ ~ ~~'~ - ~ ~~C? ~ c:::/' (I) ~T ,. ,-..... -~~ v .- ~ ... a.- ,....- + @ ....... z .. ~ .... -.. -... ... ,. r ... .1 ~, ~ ..w.... 11. .. II. '0' ,. .t 't ~ ',1' __ . _ . : ~~~'.~~ '7 ~... ~~. . ~ J 4.....NP\ , r : f~ ~.. C' ...". II t .. ß. .....& ,- - . . " .,. ~'l£ . . ,. -...- ~~ ~ : ~ g . J ~ : ~ ~ ~ : .... ~. " .~. ~ I 1 3. +. . u ~'.- _ T_ .. ., . . :; ç .- . ~ . !.I.· ~-- ~ .0 ~(it J S J ~~ ;- ~ ~ :; '1' ~ t ~ 5 ----.:; .. t I ~ . ~ ... . I ~ ....-.. I_ I þ -, ,.~~ ~. · ~ 6 .~~ I ~ ~ .. I. ... ..~ ~ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: 2/24/86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PS 86-1 SUbject: Request of Jim Warren and Carey Beck for Replat of Lot 3R, Calloway Acres Addition This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lot 3-R, Calloway Acres Addition. The subject property is located on the west side of Parchman Street north of Grapevine Highway. The property is currently zoned C-2 Commercial. The purpose for the proposed plat is to combine two existing lots in to a single tract for development. The applicant's intent is to construct an office-warehouse on the tract. All of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Replat of Lot 3R, Calloway Acres Addition as submitted. ~ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Oper ·ng Budget er Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available R11J~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Paqe 1 of 1 PS S,,-l C,Af.LÞtIJA..., Ac.R es .... '3 it. o 500, 1000 150C r'---- - ZO ING APOF NO A I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 5 P & Z Minutes February 13, 1986 ( 4. PS 86-1 PS 86-1 APPROVED 5. PS 86-3 PS 86-3 APPROVED ( Vice Chairman Wood asked Mr. if he would like to wi aw his request and c in with a zoning request. said he did not, he wanted Mr. Hallford made the motion to deny PS 85-98. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 4-0. Request of Jim Warren & Carey Beck for replat of Lot 3R, Calloway Acres Addition. Jim Warren came forward. Vice Chairman Wood stated there was an assessment due on this property. Mr. Warren stated he has a check for the amount if they would accept it tonight. Mr. Royston stated he had rather they turn it in in the morning. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PS 86-1 subject to the paying of the assessment. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Hanson Properties replat of Lots 7R, Nob Hill Ad made the motion to approve PS 86-3. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I . ~ ( ( KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas January 25, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-823, CITY OF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS CALLOWAY ACRES, LOT 3R, REPLA T , PS 86 - 1, GRID MAP 148 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The telephone number of the owners should be shown on the plat. 2 In accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements the Developer's Engineer should affix the following certification to the drainage plan: 2.1 I, , a professional engineer registered in the State of Texas, have prepared this drainage study in compliance with the latest published requirements and criteria of the City of North Richland Hills, and have verified that the topographic information used in this study is in compliance with said requirements and is otherwise suitable for developing this workable overall Plan of Drainage which can be implemented through proper subsequent detailed construction planning. SIGNATURE , P. E. SEAL 3 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 4 The fire hydrant on Scruggs Drive should not be used for the 300-foot radius coverage required for commercial zoning. This fire hydrant is more than 800 feet by public right-of-way to Lot 3R. A fire hydrant on the proposed Grapevine Highway Water Line will be located approximately 85 feet south of Lot 3R on Parchman Street, but this fire hydrant will not provide complete coverage. We would recommend adding a fire hydrant in front of this lot. 5 The owners should be required to pay their prorata share of the improvements of Parchman Street and the 6-inch water line, if this has not already been paid. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 .. METRO/267-3367 l- ie I I I f I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I Subdivision Review L~ter continued ( CALLOWAY ACRES 6 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the CitY-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~~ttI~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: r~r. Rodger N. Li ne, City Hanager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Hr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development January 25, 1986 PS 86 - 1 2 PAGE I Ie I I I ì I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Ow~~. Long and Associate( Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS January 30, 1986 Mrs. Wanda Calvert Planning and Zoning Coordinator Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Lot 3-R, Calloway Acres PS-86-1 Dear Mrs. Calvert: We have received a copy of the City Engineer's (Richard W. Albin, P.E.) letter pertaining to Lot3-R, Calloway Acres replat and have the follow- ing comments: 1. The owner's telephone number will be added to the plat. 2. The engineer's certification has been added to the drainage plan. 3. The City will notify the utility companies if they have not already done so. 4. A fire hydrant will be added to the water layout and will be located in front of this tract on the north side of Parchman Street. 5. Statement of City's pOlicy for pro-rata. The Owners have indicated to me that their title policy does not show a~ assessment owed on Parchman. If, however, any is owed, it will be paid prior to obtaining a building permit. 6. The Owners have been made aware that they are responsible for any City ordinances, codes and policies. If you have any further requirements or questions, please give me a call. aerelY'in ~~1oM P. Consulting Engine I! E. I ODL/ml cc: Mssrs. Jim Warren & Carey Beck P.O. Box 1668 - Hurst 76054 1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / Hurst, Texas 76053 / Phone /8J7) 281-8121 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: SUbject: Request of Hanson Properties for Replat of Lots 7R, 8R, and 9R, Block 3, Nob Hill Addition 2/24/86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PS 86-3 This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lots 7R, 8R, 9R, Block 3 Nob Hill Addition. The subject property consists of three residential lots located on Lombard Street in the first phase of the Nob Hill development. The purpose for the proposed plat is to modify the existing lot layout to eliminate the existing cul-de-sac on Lombard Street in order to extend the street into an adjacent tract which has been given preliminary approval by the Commission for additional expansion of the Nob Hill Subdivision. In the applicant's response to the Engineer's comments it is noted that the proposed lots each have an area which is deficient to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. Lot 7R is 420 square feet less than the 9000 square foot lot minimum. Lots 8R and 9R meet all of the area requirements. However, neither lot meets the 110 foot average lot depth requirement. These deviations occur as a result of the elimination of the cul-de-sac which provided the additional land area needed to make all three lots in conformance. RECOMMENDATION: II The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Replat of Lots 7R, 8R, and 9R, Block 3, -r Nob Hill Addition as submitted. f , Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot r Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available tL¿ 11\ ~ - City Man ger - -- CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director Paoe 1 of 1 -.......::: R-3 /1 , " I ' \\ \ \ \ " I-I ,,, SU , " , \ \ \ \ ...........~ , I r.1? I \ I , , , , J AG I Page 5 P & Z Minutes February 13, 1986 ( Ie I I I I I I I '-- I I I I I I I f I PS 85-98 DENIED 4. PS 86-1 5. PS 86-3 PS 86-3 APPROVED ( Mr. Hawkins to proceed. Vice Chairman Wood asked Mr. Hawk- s if he would like to withdraw hi request and come back in with request. Mr. Hallford ma e the motion to deny PS 85-98. T s motion was seconded by Mr. Schwin r and the motion to deny carried -0. Re st of Jim Warren & Carey Beck for plat of Lot 3R, Calloway Acres Addition. Jim Warren came forward. Vice Chairman Wood stated there was an assessment due on this property. Mr. Warren stated he has a check for the amount if they would accept it tonight. Mr. Royston stated he had rather they turn it in in the morning. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PS 86-1·subject to the paying of the ·assessment. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Hanson Properties for replat of Lots 7R, 8R, & 9R, Block 3, Nob Hill Addition. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 86-3. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I f I ( r KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas January 27, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-943, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NOB HILL ADDITION, LOTS 7R, aR, 9R, BLOCK 3, RE P LA T , PS 86 - 3, GRID MAP 80 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: I All contiguous platting and/or ownership should be shown on the plat. 2 In accordance with County requirements, property corner monumentation should be noted on the plat. 3 The area of Lot 7R, Block 3 is 8580.33 square feet, which is smaller than the 9000 square foot minimum that is required for R-2 zoning. Lots 8R and 9R are less than the minimum lID-foot average depth required for R-2 zoning. 4 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 5 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivisio~ Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. /2uÀad- W~ ~ RICHARD W. ALBItJ, P.E. R~JA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . .METRO/267-3367 lanning& Zoning Co~mission City of North Richland Hills " 7301 N.E.Loop 820 . th Richland Hills"Texas 76118 NOB H ILL ADD ITION ,Lot s 7R, 8R, & 9R, Block 3,· ~S· 86-3 " response to Mr. Albin's letter dated January 27, 1986: ' . . We have shown all contiguous platting and ownership pIa t ., 3. Lot 7R meets the depth requirement and falls 420 square feet short. Lots8R and 9R meet the square footage requirements, but not the average depth requirement. The purpose of the Rep1at is to obtain access to the 15 acres to the south which has been submitted as Block 6, NOB HILL ADDITION. 4. City Staff function. 5. The owner is aware of his responsibility for all prOV1S10ns the City Ordinances, Policies and Procedures. S.incerely, I Ie 1 I I I; I·': '1' ,"" I 1;1 11'- I I I I I I I {!, I ( Stembridge & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers February 3, 1986 2. Monumentation has been noted. ,~ DRS/et ç, cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development · '~"-I~~~": .~ ,-- .,- '~ 4028 Daley, Suite 103 . North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 28~1363 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Planning and Development Department: ~Ubject: 2/24/86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: SO 86-2 Request of May Advertising to Locate a Billboard Sign on N. E. Loop 820 West of Edison Drive ~ ~ May Advertising Company, representing Roan-Allen Enterprises, is requesting City Council approval for the location of a Billboard Sign on Tract l-R, Block I-A, Richland Terrace Addition. This property is located on the south side of Loop 820 west of the proposed extension of Edison Drive. The applicants currently have a total of four wood construction non-conforming billboards. on their property which extends eastward to the intersection of Grapevine Highway. In addition, at the intersection of Grapevine Highway the applicants also have a mono-pole type conforming billboard. In the application documents they indicate that their intent is to remove all of the wood construction signs on the property at the time that the second billboard is constructed. The proposed sign location is indicated to be at the front property line of the subject tract 125 feet east of the west property line and a minimum of 150 feet east of the nearest residential property. The distance between the proposed sign and the existing billboard at Grapevine Highway is 2100 feet measured along the frontage road. RECOMMENDATION: It is Staff's opinion that the proposed billboard will meet the minimum criteria of the ordinance if the existing non-conforming signs are removed from the site. I I ~ , ~ ~ I I Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ;en/~ City Manager , Finance Director '-.... CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ~ '\- Page 1 of 1 I I Ie I I l1li .:.l~/~ I œïZJ REGULAR t~·~iJ.';¡~['I ,';-, '1 rì . ') 515', /' :~'¡ ; ~~ 5;? (ZiJ ~\) l' !~ ~l (~ D ry (~P ._~~" \c;-,> ~' , ':7 ¿.-" \.'V ¿~, ::.:::~ é~ U U ~ ~~ (75"1 Ç7),? UUÜ G13 \~/ '~~'/ o 1'1 I ~ :---..i :-' '1 \ I' ::::J U /\ -:: !_) 8 2 FCJRT C_: F:; -- ¡-J ,- -_. A S I ~ 4rJCJ '-.j\j E :::3 --I \/ ¡ C~ }<. E R \1 p ¡-~ [i ;\J ~- '- ~ ~; :3 :.3 - :-~ t:J 7 ': ORDER HOTLINE 1-800-433-5663 February 6, 1986 Janette Rewin City Secetary City of North Richland Hills Re: ERECTION OF ONE ALL STEEL UN I-POLE OUT DOOR BULLETIN BOARD. Ms Rewin: May Advertising Corporation, would like to request a hearing before the City Council of North Richland Hills for approval to erect an all steel uni-pole outdoor ad- vertising structure on the far west part of the property owned by 820 Mercantile, George Allen and David Roan. This property is legally described as Richland Terrace Addition. Sit\)~~\~ D. Lapham Assistant Vice-President JDL/fo l~', I /., f\ It, l" :_~: r-:. C.:: i_ E·: /\ I _ U ;'v 1 ¡ í",! ~.J !'./; e~4~~ [1m) 261-8295 1'.'/1'1:": [1"1 UNDERGROuND CAlli ...........0'81.'''''9 ,,, T"",. \1'<'''.1, PIe.. C.. CoIIe<:l Of Nottry ~..... '-- , ........ c.. ~~ 30', -l9JJ5~J (§)~ FUCC 5Lf'F'U:ME"OTS CLEANNG ""OOLCTS C~T1CS 237 - 9303 I '1 :3 I.R:lc -@ 336-2661 .Ji'l1~i:I(:(" UIDIISIOUIII CAIU Ulli~~ .... e&af IW.... .AU ........ ¡¡m. .. L'" . ti., .;j " ''#!. ' , "" . . ""... - . :-.. I' I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I _..._---~---........--------... - ..-.......,............--....... ......................<~~ GEORGE ALLEN COMP ANY February 4, 1986 Mr. J.D. Lapham Assistant Vice President May Advertising 400 West Vickery Fort Worth, Texas 76113 RE: 820 Mercantile - Richland Center Dear Dickie: This will confirm our proposal to remove four signs located on the above- referenced property and substitute one single pole pylon sign to be located on the far west end of the property. David Roan and I would enter into a similar arrangement with May Advertising as governs the single pole pylon sign located at the far east end of the property. It is our opinion that the removal of these four unsightly signs and replacement with a modern single pole sign would enhance the visual quality of the property. For your benefit, I've marked an area on the survey of Tract lA where we would propose the sign location. Regards, ,,-, J í I .'/ {0L-ft~~ Ai ~-¡,J/)..1.-Ò. \Marge 4Ylen -{ GWA/mg enclosure cc: David Roan 3131 McKinney Ave. . Suite 450, LB-I09 Dallas, Texas 75204 214/871-1311 I' 1 Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST PERMIT NUMBER TYPE OF SIGN ALL ST£EL ÙN' - 16[£ G'fX48~DATE d. ~ Æ~ NAME OF APPLICANT/BUSINESS fV1A Y AÞVeR1l-$\N.& CoR..P ADDRESS 400 W. Vtc..Kee.v PHONE 3 3~ -~b71 LOCATION OF SIGN '820 M.e..<2.CaNT"lL-E. - K\~4~ND (-eN-Iu? (¡;~tc:..l.1lAt-.\DTeetAC{,.~ SIGN LOCATION ON LOT fA€< Wf.ST ~ f\hQ\I€. P~P~TY NAME OF CONTRACTOR 4 q 27 S l6-Ñ Co ~ ADDRESS tfl2.ß $. t>.(>~hÑ~ ~bc;.l~ PHONE 2~7- {Ogl I WIDTH OF LOT FACING QUALIFYING STREET LfBo M~\",^TlY .hot.{ W~\T ~V l.t~ 1Dfct~Di SIGN TAKING UP PARKING SPACE(S) YES NO v . 00 2o 000. - . BLOCKING FIRELANES YES NO V' ESTIMATED SIGN VALUE $ PERMANENT OR BILLBOARD FILING FEE $50.00 + ESTIMATED COST WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE BUILDING STRUCTURE OR LAND TO WHIC OR ON WHICH THE STRUCTURE IS TO BE ERECTED OR SIGN TO BE PAINTED. YES NO ***********************************~************************~************** THE m1DERSIGNED AGREE TO CONFOæ1 ]:,') AI -'_ i'--PPt:rr.A.:)-~ E SICN ORDINAi'lCE .: ')OJ., 1-24-83. -.':-m OTHER ORDINANCES Oi THE C':i'Y OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, AND ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITIE FOR E CTIN THIS SIGN. ~ APPROVED BY DATE SIGNED APPROVED DATE PLEASE ATTACH ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO THE BACK OF THIS FORM. ¡ J ; I } , .:...-.).~...ii4 'v/'y/v// _ff:_- cJ//'/!19-éL' _ iT __ _ ___ :T-~' -lr~- ---~rr-1t jð /n<; t~J.T~- -- - 1 ~ __ j~_____ éY'OC/1'?9)'" I: --::-1 ~Il cb ,-- Ii' ~ I ~~ ,~ ~. , \ I ,~: ~r --- C/OJ"..TOver -" co.fwot4- ç' /odder- ~ O/'e ,.Gn?V/ded I ~ I ¡ I ~ ~ ~ Jee Cú/unJ/] ~0/"J/Î - {/(3'/1-/¿le (-U/U/17/) /0 Q(? o/Ise;!-,;tp ße/' roof- /Ò/, /(/I/ f-l~9 deud ¡¿Jod 1..7e/ìechu/). I J---- ~.~ii ~ «) : ~ , T .y-ooê o I £ /u// /~/Q5Pþe ;£ CC:I7¡-e/~ /7lt.Junf- Pix:? FROIl/T &£VAT/OÆ./ /4 //, 4,A) I ~ -----<::> ~ -~ '''-.'/t.. ~--)' r- "0 ~ ~~ ~~ ,ò" ~ ê~ ~~ \~ ~ ~¿,.k ¿Þ',;¢ lL, ~-J'VO&VVL~f ,JCJC:::=> d/'wg Û,.c¡oS9d) /âr- /()dder¿ i\-O/A-Þ1/0Y , 't->/O//ú 'Æ/ ,~~ ~ ~ kp;.. ~ '/ //!9 J//deJ :)j/( k=> IO/Y~/, piJe . :.9UJ,,-e/J/ ;' JU~?9//-Y over /'--)« >e @ ...:..) L ~/'}';:e" ~ ~/19 Æ?J- Ii -I' rj ~ ê1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ l ('TIC·· ,....fµe,) ort::quo/ cÝ/a I'noy 6e ' Jp/;ced t''Y UJI'/JgO/ù//pene/ro_ ~! no/) ,1 ~-)j( / u// ..Jrou/XÝ 6y 0 ',( '// /-/;. c ~ ,y('~Æ~r / ~(.J/) }~/e/"'l ~()/}L/'e/-é) ç¿Ju-//Í'!9 , " ~ ,~ ......... ~ f.i 44 (Ý/O. JPL-/C£ D~-rA/'- £ /or.Y/(:n /J/,Óe - DR/LiED JHAFT roOT/ItJG>- 7åID/ l-/e!9/;~ Ce/}/er /7/)7': /Ü~ Po /0 /0 oFJ/c'V) De If} 0/0, De ~/; DIG. 0-:. 70 47:'J// /~~ 0'" 4~O// '0'-04/' 4':0// 47!7/'lO5¿~-:-O~ /7:0// 4~ ()/. /;-7'Q" 4:0// 5¿~//'lo.57~C) /7':'0// 4~O// /CJ~O/ 4~U'" S7-/ / // /0 <L2~ 0" /8 ~ all 4/' ~ all 7.: 0 // -;,l ~ 0-~ c;;¿'~////o 07-"0" /ð ':.. ~:/ -/"- 0"/ /d~O// ....¿:..(~// 0'7.//% 72~O/:' /ð~O/. 4~-~-'7 ~~'j'-~// 4~~;ý ;~?~///V 77-/0// / Y-'()/- 4~~~ ¡y: all ~~~// 77-/ /% '7t)~Cr £Q~ 0' lCT ~ ()// 2'1! C)// ._J: ()// I ~ CJ ~ ~ CJ I I I é'0n/-er /-ff)/; Full rì~9 ..J0/fdx 04Jd '- j~ 1:zf % 0.. :JOO o /'Ø A' O.5(JO ~~//Ø / 0, ..,í~ð ~-'~Ø/O~RY I I o -¢ . . o . \n:34/5.5- - 2,-1;;;39; ß4, q ~ ~ ~,\f: L. ~ ~ ~~ :.,. '/ø' //325 :t)/~ W¿4,¥,J.J - .. ,/y¡J, ,:1 ~--., ,f~ '~17;/ ~ // o ~;.r~1 ~ . ~ gu..:rJ"e~ Æ3- ~ 1,iJ. k 4 CEA../TER iYOUA/T COA../A/E:CT/OAJ -- ,,"--. ~ "-'" .-, ""........ '-h:J ~ ~ ~ J~rl/J.gerJ ~c (Jee de/a¡¿ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /Od' era. '* órl?a~ \ ~ ~ U,or&h;l ct:v1 (' ~ d~o/¿ ~ } ~ Lex-.ex-4.:nf.,h..9 \1 ¿c4óJ{&o)~ ~1 ~I- ----C ~ ~ ~i~t ~-/ 'I ~"Çt 't ~t E j~- C4¥S4 ¡ 3~O¥ ! /~ --~ ~ ~ ~, "\ ) "- ~ -f- ) ~ "') ) "- , .' ¡ ~ ro /Ý,a ~: --- '-'" j I ,Z,9UJJe(ê'¡ \1 j t. 1) L ~/ 1y¡J, 1\ ~ _/ '- ~) : I~ ^p. ~_' .~ reor I ;~Y.:1 - q:JOr/ed6y I IlIxÆJ.- . -! ~3-¥3%~ r~/Y ,().Ver ~r pvoA'PY'o/J -- :'€ . ¥. rxÆ-r 4 (/Y,o.) Ig.ØA~ 60£- · ~ q'_3~()'-'· I ~] ~ ÆJr 1/ JiJ/)J , D~7"'/.(J I I I' //8 Q; '~ "- .~ ~ ~ ~ \. 'i.J "- -..t.,t J,~ ,¿¡;. ~o/AÞVoy JP , i '/, . \.I / r/ J '" ' i',?4 3 L.. ~'~ 3' c4""" .,....~ 5' Ar- t·~ ,I- L>( 'e R ~ {- J tíl;~ger ~ "lð /1.;i¿5 6o//"J" ; 1/ ';/ ), .I,~ ";:r"'\ L~r _ 'u ,:'" ,if ._ '. - " ~ ~j Ï") .. ìr-., ,~f't ) --;\'-" ~ "': ( , '~':; ,:~J.4> ~ 4 l'~ '. ~ ~ I, ,).' ""', ¡=-ÞA~/.c L2t_-l/1/L.. J2ì-1EOULE ,TORJ/().{j ~ 'i¡.:J,¿- M-vo L.DtW C'Ð../T/J1 I/Æ A/LL'FLAG ~p_J¡:: /ð"'Ø'..t OZ5Q .1u'Jó ~ 0, _v¿ 3Op.J:r /(3vø.(' . ..¿-'.:j'() JO' ø, ',f7..' "5 P,J: r 'o'Ø/.j,¿5Ù. "O'/ø f O</:¡¿j 'Ýµ. ,~~ Q.Q.J .S~ ~ ~} ~~ ~ -: ',).{ - C/;þ . JTH/Il/GCR DL-771IL_ ~~r ~ // '7!J~:-. < f/B:: C / t/-; OJ /;q~~L/ J/ol' /Iu/e 0i.:~W LiB -----.......---=-, J'ò,. 60rk k '(.,·\:}C~ Dl e .¿4;d4.x'j ,'''' , . ~' . "/ " -/ ..\ ;" ~ t " ~ ~ ~ " " '~I ~t . " \.' j .' r " -~./ . . /;/ ~ ,',- ~..:' \ I" ;/}é?C/j ,F¿jLL.- ¡C¡A" / __ ()/v^-.t-C'7?CJAJ I - , , I S ~ A ~J .J ,; , . ~ t. " F\.-,RýOUR PE~SO/~A R E t\,¡ G ;> t. f. M,; t~' ~';;." , C>ìPI[[) UR r)('-1,~-~: ..:> E q ~ ~: S S \ n. ) ~ 1 h 1~ '. " . 1 - . J -' r ~1 ---I I I I I I ¡, / ~; \.or ~,) ------------ "';' ..... "- .. ... .....t- "'.. . .. r,.. ~ . .. .......... . :"... .\ It. .... ~:........ --.---- - ------ I, . ~ 1. ~~ .') >1- ':C J , ' ~' , ~ ",'f. t -{ t" 't ' I , ~\J - ~ ~'< ~ '] ,~ ,..., J '1 \¿ ';I i ,~ ~ I ~ - ~ I <I ~-~ I , ~, , II I II ¡ ¡l~-'- , ~.. I 1-, I lA, /---11 --.J .. .. . · /. ~ . . f . .\ '.. ~ ~)~ , # ~';. ~ I I _' ~ I , ~ ~ ' .. ...; . ", ~ r .'. . ) " ,) (, (¿) / ~ e // / ~ ð/;' / -:. 0 ~ - ~ - ~f-~TIO.A../AL f-h~£ DE.ü1/LJ ( ~ t v/Oy~~ ~;J .¿ I ..:::.i I ¿¢" % .2;;L. // · \ .---- '...;/ ~ ..)-:J- ..' ,)j&' ..- " ( /;'.'1,..) I '- ')ï / ( :; -I T Î ~ hoe/"' 'c:-ur j,,\.-ä/A-JI--o/ -" ~'-:,. S/C'/' J /~ .~ èK7/CYb..YS (yt:JC//y - L3A3xÆ ~~J0P.) ~~¿¿r'4 J#/o/er.T ~ LfipJ' /lyp) ~ iJ ~. ,~ ~ ~~ ~~ .Ç) ~ 9; ~~ .~ ~ :~ P1 A3¿S éx:J/;6- ~ ~ ~ t "t - " ~ ~! '\, ¡P9~~J;' \ YVo~;\Oy ~~4y3A'~ 3 ~O// J~//' .. ~ :... _ ,-':'f~ /,/ _ _~ J;' ~q_C~~#:' ~ Ø-4J'¿;) á>/;tJ ~ ~1 ~ ¡ ~ ~ ~ \Ìr '~:;{/»e/ê '-- t)/t /Æ.../L,:.-CT7UA.../ Ví~yCC . ·/~:-)7 t )/OÆ/ CO /4:48" ,-,///'yp £ GRC STRUCTURES, LTD DRAFTSMAN PROJECT ENGINEER ",\.\.\.\\,~ ~~þ.~~.~r ~~+ '(£~;:';'?!"5~: ) ............. O-ern (,ARS~. E'" ~I l ~...~~ 3Ò;;:;"'~'::':~~~' ~ .{(~ ~~~ ~"~.r""~(STE~~~( "I,~~ . Jt ··,fION~Ù::"~· 'L¡ t ~ .\\\"~~ 1/1- L- Jh/60Y/ch - ------ ------- DATE ORA WN DRA WING NO. ,¿-/~85 /75 I- I I" I I I, I I I Ie I I I I I I I t' I /+)-~ ~~)- ~~ -f)-I$' ~ ~ It, ":0 Q¿ , "" -r::~>- '7 If, ., ~.,' ''',~/ o'-:~ 41t ; -'. &~ (. " ,/ ~ 00 -', ~ ~ f'" 3.s~ . / '~~~....~... ( ~ 0 --- ' " ..,~ r , <.¡" ... ... ~""'Ðo "'~ , , -1?te4I1{A~E. -- ·tlTILITy ·.Æ.sI'1.~.T VaL.k $!!ð-B I Pr;- .37 .--.---..---.-. ~ \oø' /"- ---' - - /. " (/ /' , r / // -": " ') ~.,--_./ I~·' "", . " ...... (' 1 (, ! I ¡ l / -"'>, ""-,. RETAIL 28,000 SF 2 STORY /$/1 " "- " .................... ¡ ..,--) ~ - - _ 1- /- _ _ ___ ___ I : . _ '" I . '----~------~ '" ,,) 'I . -- '" \\ \ \ ( ~ ~"r'~'N/", -!::: f( L..~L-v ~~~,='\' .~, T \ \ -''-'.f> I I ' " , I 1- " ~,._._- .~ . ',"} " . -". ¡-~ Y RETAIL I 9,300 SF r-;",y "'jy~ '" '''', I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: Council Meeting Date: 2/24/86 Agenda Number: SO 86- 3 Subject: Request of Alan Young Buick for Variance to Section 4.1(b) of the Sign Ordinance. Alan Young Buick located at 7724 N.E. Loop 820 has requested that the City Council consider a variance to Section 4.1(b) of the Sign Ordinance which limits the number of ground signs on one particular site to one. The applicants currently have a non-conforming ground sign located on the northeast corner of the site. The requested variance is to allow an additional ground sign of 121 square feet to be located adjacent to most westerly driveway on the site. The purpose for the proposed sign would be to advertise the used car sales area. Under the criteria of the Sign Ordinance a commercial site is allowed to have a ground sign maximum of 300 square feet based upon the street frontage of the subject lot. The applicant's dealership frontage along the service is 410 feet. The dealership sign currently on the site is 400 square feet in size. This existing sign was permitted and installed prior to the adoption of the current ordinance making the sign legally non-conforming. The requested sign would exceed the ordinance controls in three areas. (1). Section 4.1(b) allows one ground sign per business. (2). Section 4.2(b) limits the allowed ground sign to a maximum of 300 square feet per sign face. (3). Section 4.2(c) limits the height of any sign located at the property line to a total of 25 feet. The applicants are requesting the installation of a second sign of 121 square feet which give a site total of 521 square feet. The sign design proposes a height of 36 feet for the second sign which is to be located immediately inside of the property adjacent to thé street right of way. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council make a determination as to the advisability of allowing the applicant to exceed the ordinance requirements in order to have a second sign advertising their used car sale lot. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available (f::/t1 ö!~ nt Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director ~ ..... ~... Paae 1 of 1 I I Ie œl!J 7724 N.E. loop 820. P. O. Box 18769. Fort Worth. Texas 76118 Metro 589-7452 (817) 284-8244 I I February 4, 1986 I I' Ms. Jeanette Rewis City of North Richland Hills p.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 __0"""/' I I', + ',~, I Dear Ms. Rewis, I This letter is our request to appear before the City Council meeting on February 24, 1986. I, e I The purpose is to respectfully request a variance in the sign ordinance so that we may erect a General Motors product sign. Thank you for your consideration. I I I I I I -- ~ /¢ - -*-- 1/ I I' .. I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I --------- - - - - - -----.- --- - --_../ I I Ie I I . . p ~ ~. ~ ,I I I I I I -- ,I -'- .--- N -_. ~ç /~~,. * ~ ..... .. -----~_. ..- -..,...- /NTERJ'7ATC -4'2~ SE~V.(C¿- Rð...4ð ~ . " . ..-. .~~-._-- .þ-.. d.r~·w· .~ ~L ' AI""'L~ ñ. · .... " ~ 'Ai Iii '~\~ ~ ~U:,:: ~ ~i/C.. ',- , ~ j, 'f ~ . '1 ~~ I . : t ~t '=' ~ r7~'~~':~ r::~--· J~ I ~ ~ · .. -'. .~, ~ .. ~ tl .' . . (þ , . ~, ~. "t~· . t:: ....3 ~I, ·fliJI. . , 'I ~ I " .. ilJ .~. ; r ~ J. · f ~. ,I,'i-.. , ~ I " . : '"..._ _, ',.. ~ \. I .' . .. ~ - .--1.) i , "1 ' - .~ L If I' . - E:.~.L.~_I·¿~~·:! I ··--~"-f"· ,.STIf'....Y I. ~._.!JJ: I . - . .. '4-' . ~ "ICA:' iI¿D(/Ç .-.. -_~- f :, I · TJ- - .- I , r i ~ ~ ! . f ; I·" . '" _. . . ._ -_J .~ , :-.t..· ,': 1:-. - ..J' . It., .' ; ~ ~ , ~. ~ r- _. --..-.-... ·fJ~ , t . : ~ ~i \ I ~~, ~ : ,~ - ( 'I. . -.. :--_.L . - u_.___j ldl t - - _.. ~- ¡- _. - .- - -- , ~ i : ~ j 4' J ",' ~ ::: ' ß I ~,' :~I ~ ~, ~: ~ ¿ I '\ ~~. .s. . .- . .. . .. . ... .\ J \. l £ . . .- ~ ~ " ; r---- - -.. . . tl ~ , -Ï_ .~~ ._J :J ~~--.,I----,--" Jr\·ør.-"· ·...-I'wf':.,µ~'.--h. ' ---.-- ---.... . . .....-- ..., -.. . .--.-. . ~ " PAf!..T OF LOT A I 7..sq. A<:'ftEl$ 4.1 ~'''' ... , '-.-. -~ ~o ·N·,.·.·... ".~ J. . . :~.,,;.'"':"1. ~- '. --.. - ~ '.~ t.:~.!_:~t. r~. 'a:..,.,,:: ~..., r .f ".JJ. IV ." ;':;. ,.:, PLA'r ('F A r~HT OF LoT A 0" CAJ.LOWAY ADÞtTtPt,. Atl ~IIUJTJO'" 'm TilE CITY 0' NORTII RICIO""'D HIU.s. TDAS, ACCORÞINCr TO TilE rLAT TIIEREUF RECCJIfUr.U IN VUI.I!ÞtE 1AII.CJ", PAC:E I, ~LA" RECOIlIA.C¡ or TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, "Le;o bEIN(. "t.SCkUtI.D AS A I'RACT 0' LAND OUT OF TIrE II. II. WALLAcE SURVEY. A8STRACT I 605, TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS SEE ATTACHED 'J~LD NOTES lItO I..C"OAc....~ln' 0'''1'' 'HAH IN"..... .-- "101"0 .:'~5' ~...:~, · '110.. ~... .. ~.... },r ....~.' o 111(\.. ~·~c t..(~·~;·~.;;;:.:.:;::......, A ~, PAil<: IYA". ~..,.................\..., Or"'..,. 'II' . ~ "0.. ,,.. tI. _ :.., SITE PLAN lOVD BR^NSOM SURVE YORS INC. I. (;1\"" D .U'lIC SU~VfVCtll '011 NO.'.. SYLVANIA AVE. ''- WOIIH, UJrAS 7.111 1)4-J477 '12 P"'Wt..p..~". 'r....,. ...., '..~''''.'' '1I..,..t" I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -- I Buick Motor Division DEALERSHIP IDENTIFICATION SIGNS k 7f1' ! : c f ¡ , ! i I ~ . I '-Î/w A 11 ' 3%H B 11 ' 3%' C 36' OH D 20' 0" E 26' 0" F 1 0' 9~" A ~ B I I ¡ ~ " USED CARS ~ m r II o I D .. GROUND MOUNT ~ ~epartment: Subject: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 2/24/86 Request of Richland Hills Church of Christ Agenda Number: SO 86-4 for Variance to Sign Ordinance Section 4.1(b) and 4.2(b) ~ Michael Barnard, Architect for the Richland Hills Church of Christ has requested that the City Council consider approving a variance to the Sign Ordinance for the Church's new facilities under construction at Loop 820 and Meadow Lakes Drive. Section 4.1(b) of the Ordinance requires that anyone development be limited to a single ground sign. Section 4.2(b) requires that the ground sign be a maximum of 300 square feet per sign face. The Church's request is that two ground signs be authorized. The larger sign would be located on the east side of Meadow Lakes Drive at Loop 820 to identify the main church building. The sign requested would be 405 square feet in size and 31 feet in height. With the set-back shown on the Site Plan the height proposed is in compliance with the Ordinance. The smaller sign is proposed to be located on the west side of Meadow Lakes Drive and south of the Service Road to the far side of the parking lot of the Church's Community Center. Advertisement of the Community Center is the purpose for this proposed sign. The sign would be 44 square feet in size and have a height of approximately six feet. RECOMMENDATION: I It is recommended that City Council make a determination whether the Church Site should ....be considered two separate developments for signage purposes allowing the two signs and lJ~whether a variance should be granted to allow the oversize sign for the main sanctuary I building. , , I I I I I I ~. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) I Oper· g Budget I 0 er I Financ.e Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available (( tl/~ nt Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I fÞ I I I I I I ~ I I ~ilCQ)N ~ ~ AIRiCCLHJlJilJECCil§ 215 ARNOLD AVENUE · ARLINGTON TEXAS 76010 . 817 265-1515 18 February 1986' Jeanette Rewis City Secretary City of North Richland Hills' 2301 N. E. Loop 820 Fort Worth, Texas 76118. RE: Richland Hills ·Church of Christ Dear Jeanette: We request to be placed on the Agenda for the February 24, 1986, City Council meeting in order to request a variance to the City Sign Ordiance #1001. The variance request is to be made on behalf of the Richland Hills. Church of Christ at 6250 and 6300 N. E. Loop· 820. The Church requests two ground signs; one for their main facility on the east side of Meadowlake Dr. and one small ground sign for the Christian Community Center on the west side of Meadowlake Dr. which is a violation of 4. 2(b). The Church also requests permission to have small directional signs along the sidewalks as required and/or signs on the glass storefront as required to direct users to the proper door at the Christian Community Center. Please find enclosed one copy of each of the following: sign location plan, Christian Community Center sign and Main Facility siQn (with area shown). Thank you, Jff~~~~ Michael Barna~d - . - - 1 MB Ijg Enclosure I ;. 00 t\ :JJ . - OJ: 0 :Emo(') :I: 0:000 ~~ ~(JJ r- :, » :DmC~ :2 r-»Z~ šC/) c-,¡ c c°CJ)c:: ~ c::! J: Tlmz -- ~ O· C - Z;I> , r -:xJz-f r- en ,,-< -z r::A (f) ,- CI)> -I (): Î () Õ:r: 0 -< :I: zc » I c cnz :D :c G) m 0 () :I: ::n m I 0 -< z , II ~ -; ð) n Q m f\) :I: :0 (J1 I :tJ r JJ 0 - en C -f I I I I .. 15--6 . I I '- I I I Ie I I I I I I I , I I I I I I l- I I 7()E ò10J::: T.3:Þ (J)~~ 6" 0 ðZ . .())- ~ï - . > ~ ~ m .Q Va ~ D D 1::1 i n ~ J: -i ,.. b )) ~ 2 m IJ c I ~ I r- m n I I: 11 n I ~ 0 ~ 11 ~ n ~ J: I D · ...¡ Inm ~ en i In ~I '"^(J} ~- .~ <i' -;Z 11 t --I O~O (\ ~ - o Z . r ~ .' . it ~,J 9'(1] !4$J > [0 (b tf -0 r- ~ -- -\/' / , . . /1' .- . '0'" : , ' ' () ;';,. I . "~ . . , . I , , . (/ ~., .~.. (': . :, , ' I " . .... .' . . I 0(\ m:I: ~~ "fJ- » ~z: ~b' I r; c z :¡ -(' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 2/24/86 Request of Floortime Inc. for Release of Five Foot Agenda Number: GN 86- 15 Utility Easement on Lot AR-l, Calloway Acres Addition Mr. Fred Whitney of Floortime Inc. has submitted a request for the release of an existing five foot utility easement on Lot AR-l, Calloway Acres Addition located at 7718 N. E. Loop 820. The property is located on the south side of the freeway service road immediately east of Grapevine Highway. Floortime Inc. has a commercial building located on the lot. Apparently at the time of construction the building was located adjacent to the east property line of the tract, although the plat of the property included a five foot utility easement along the entire length of the east line of the lot. This encroachment was not detected by the inspections during construction. A recent survey of the site revealed the existing encroachment. The applicant is requesting the City Council release the easement as dedicated on the original plat in order to cure the encroachment. The applicant has provided written responses from each of the franchise utilities indicating that they have no facilities located in the affected easement. Also the City has no utilities in the easement. RECOMMENDATION The Staff has no objections to the release of the easement located on the east property line of Tract AR-l, Calloway Acres Addition subject to the transaction meeting the criteria of Article 5421C-12 of the State Statutes which require that the City receive co~pensation equal to the value of the easement proposed to be released. It is recommended that if the City Council wishes to release the easement to the applicant the Staff be authorized to negotiate with the applicant to establish the value to be paid to the City for the release of the easement. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) žh~~ ' --J ) Departm t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡( tt1rÍ-~ City Manager I Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I' -- 1 I 1 I I I I -- I I 1 I I I I I- I Floortime, Inc. 1827 E. Division ~ . Arlington, Texas 76011 Telephone (817) 277-8158 Metro 265-0721 TO: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FROM: FRED WHITNEY, V.P. - FLOORTIME, INC. SUBJECT: UTILITY EASMENT - LOT ARl, CALLOWAY ADDITION TO THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. I AM REQUESTING TO BE HEARD AT THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING REGARDING CONSIDERATION OF THE COUNCIL TO RELEASE THE ABOVE REFERENCED EASEMENT. AS TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE, YOUR CONSIDERATION IS GREATLY APPRECIATED. RESPECTFULLY YOURS, ~7.. I ::i -- I I I 1 1 I I . I I I I I I I Ie I Date: To: From: S~ONSOFFORTVVORTH P.o. Box 2666 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76113 FebTIlary 6, 1986 Gene Riddle, CITY OF N. RICHLAND HILLS Les Cooper, SAMM)NS OF FORT WORm ~ ¿ Subject: RELEASE OF EASEMENT ON AITACHED PLAT Please be advised that Sammons of Fort Worth has no conflict in release of easement shown on the attached plat. This release was requested by Mr. Ed Prikryl for Mr. Fred Whitney, owner. cc: Ed Comstock Ed Prikryl, CENTURY 21 LC/bas I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -- I I K. N. WATKINS General Superintendent of Distribution Lone Star Gas Company FORT WORTH DIVISION OF DISTRIBUTION 100 W. Morninglide Dr. · fort Worth, Texas 76110 February 4, 1986 Ms. Wanda Calvert Planning and Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland .Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 5' Public Utility Easement Abandonment; Lot A-R-1 Calloway Addition, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas. Dear Ms. Calvert: Please be advised that Lone Star Gas Company has no facilities within the above referenced 5' Public Utility Easement and offers no objection to abandonment, east along north line S84-23E, for 50 feet, to galvanized spike, then south along east line SO-27E, for 153.55 feet. If further information is required, please advise. Sincerely, Gpl&~ J. M. Seals Sectional Supervisor II Facility Records & Planning Section km cc: Mr. Fred Whitney, Trustee 1827 E. Division Arlington, Texas 76011 Mr. Al Singletary file I Ie I I I I I I I II I I I I I I ~ I I Southwestern Bell Telephone H.E.B. Engr. Unit 1901 Central Dr. Rm 408 Bedford, Texas 76021 January 29, 1986 Ci ty of N. Richland Hills. Planning and Zoning Dept. 7301 Northeast Loop 820 N. Richland Hills, Tx 76118 RE: Calloway Addition - Lot A-R-1 Dear Wanda, In reference to the above mentioned addition, the five foot utility easement on the east property line and north property line of Lot A-R-1 does not contain any telephone cable. South- western Bell Telephone Company ~es not have any objections to abandoning this easement. If you have any questions, please contact me at (817) 267-0151. I Ie I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I 1à TEXAS. . ELECTRIC SERVICE COMPANY February 4, 1986 Mr. Fred Whitney 1827 East Division Street Arlington, Texas 76011 Dear Mr. Whitney: Texas Electric Service Company is aware of the building located at 7718 N. E. Loop 820 (Lot A-R-l, Calloway Addition to North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas) encroaching into the 5 foot wide utility easement dedicated along the east side of said lot in that certain Plat recorded in Volume 388-167, Page 46, Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas. Texas Electric Service Company has no objections to the abandoning of the dedicated 5 foot easement on the north and east property line of said lot. Very truly yours, .~~..~ Gaylon M. Hicks Senior Right-of-Way Agent P. O. BOX 970 · FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76101 . TELEPHONE (817) 336-9411 A DIVISION OF TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I RESOLUTION NO. 86-10 WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills is the owner of a certain five foot wide utility easement along the east side and north side of Lot A-R-I, Calloway Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas; and WHEREAS, that portion of such utility easement that is released herein is not being used for utility purposes and there is no need for such portion of such easement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: 1. For and in consideration of the sum of Three Hundred Eighty-four and no/IOO ($384.00) DOLLARS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas does hereby release unto Floortime, Inc., its successors and assigns, the following described utility easement: A utility easement five feet wide and 153.55 feet long lying along the east property line of Lot A-R-I of Calloway Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas and that portion of said easement which is five feet in width and fifty feet in length lying along the north property line of said lot as it intersects with the said easement described above as being 5 feet by 153.55 feet. The portion of the easement released herein is further shown on Exhibit '~h, attached hereto, incorporated herein and made a part hereof for descriptive purposes. PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of February, 1986. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1-- ~ ~ ? ,. III, .' " t SECOND TRACT o StatewIde Statt Vo,,,,,,, 4347 ona, 'ne. ~. 315 /'.' '0 f.. t Utility · Eas.men, . ; VOIUM. ., 0 Clf r of .. ______ 5220 Pag Nor tll· R" II ........ _----- . 8 83 I C 'and Hn,. ~ _____ 7' /¡ If --- --- Iroft S ~V - . 84_23E ~ ~~~ ~ --~'-- '0 , \-- c9~ ~ ~" " /{,'ò"':' . ~\'~~ /.,. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \, , \ (" \ \ \\ \ \~ \ -z. \ \~ \,~ ~ \ ~ j..\ , 0 , ~ -:\ r--' ~ ~ ' 0\ ~\ ." ~ ~\ :\ (Ø\ ~\ ~ :1 (þ\ ? \ L\ '- 4C., ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \' \ ~, I /E_II,j,f Å" '\ I - \ ( ß If J ~ e.."" .:t:. AI IV Lot A-R-2 ??/~ ~ "- C\I , o z LOT (~ I ·l . I J ~ ..... C\I , o z Lù t-- C\J , , o en , , , , . I , I / '" J I .. I I z £AI I C!.4r ¡.; A/ ~t- ~ ~ C\J --s I ad Lot A-R-4 fn 10 .~ c , Iù C\ 77 ~ø:¿ z J~ 2WAcrfs III I ~ I Zon~~ .. C II ~ Z I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICH LA NO HILLS Purchasing Department: Bid award to Industrial Disposal for one SUbject: Tymco Sweep in the amount of $68,510.00 2-24-86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PU 86-6 On January 17, 1986 at 10:00 a.m. bids for the above mentioned equipment were opened and the results are outlined below. Vendor Exception Amount A. Dallas Brush (Model 400) 2 $86,885.00 AI. Dallas Brush (Model 353) 2 $71,886.00 B. Martin Equipment (Model 4000) 3 $74,811.00 + $4,000.00 for high dump HI. Martin Equipment (Model 3000) 3 $63,000.00 + $4,000.00 for high dump c. Environmental Sales (Sunvack) 0 $86,428.00 C1. Environmental Sales (Aaplex) ° $65,325.00 C2. Environmental Sales (Aaplex) ° $64,874.00 D. Naylor Supply (Ravo 4000) 3 $68,426.00 E. MPS Equipment (Crosswind) 0 $68,303.00 + 1,600 for Hyd Assisted Catch Basin El. MPS Equipment (Crosswind) 0 $67,303.00 + 1,600 for Hyd Assisted Catch Basin F. *Industrial Disposal (Tymco) 0 $68,510.00 Vendor A Exceptions are: 1. Specifications require 6 cubic yard Hopper, they bid 5.5 cubic yard Hopper with 5 cubic yard usable. 2. Specifications require rubber lining Blower, they bid rubber lined Exhaust Vendor B Exceptions are: 1. Specifications require a Drive Engine and Auxiliary Engine, they did not bid an Auxiliary Engine. 2. Specifications require Automatic Transmission, they bid Hydrostatic. L- Finance Review Acct. Number 01-60-04-6600 ~Uf~:~ndS AV~il:~/ ~ , Finance Director ITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM PaQe 1 of 2 I I II I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I . I 3. Specifications require 6 cubic yard Hopper usable, they bid 6.2 by Volumetric. Vendor C No Exceptions to specifications, both units failed North Richland Hills sweeping test. Vendor D Exceptions are: 1. Specifications require a Drive Engine and Auxiliary Engine, they did not bid an Auxiliary Engine. 2. Specifications require a rubber lined Blower, they did not bid this item at all. 3. Specifications require 6 cubic yards usable Hopper, they bid 5.5 usable. Vendor E No Exceptions to specifications, failed sweeping test. Vendor F Has no Exceptions to specificati.ons and their unit out-performed all of the sweeper's evaluated and was the only unit that could pass the City of North Richland Hills sweeping test. All of the above equipment and performances were reviewed by Dennis Horvath, Gene Riddle and John Whitney. I have personally spoken to various Sweeping Companies, BFI, Mr. Sweep and the United States Air Force, (the U.S. Air Force has approximately 300 Tymco's) they all seem to agree that the Tymco is the best unit. Recommendation: It is staffs recommendation that the *Industrial Disposal Supply Co. be awarded the bid in the amount of $68,510.00 for one Tymco Sweeper Model 600. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ..... I- 1';' I ~~ ¡~lF ~:Ø."'~' · CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILL ~ , ~" PURCHASING DEPARTMENT jl [[8. N OR ~~T~~~T~~~~?'D ~~~~O~'F~~XA\.~OIIVfr SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELO~ t-- Star of the MetropIex VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS I I l'TEM I Industrial Disposal Supply Company P.O. Box 707 PIano, Texas 75074 Request For: Street Sweeper 1 DESCRIPTION Sweeper Per City of North Richland Hills Specifications Bid Opening Date: January 17, 1986 Date: Requisition No. Sealed bids will be received until 10: 00 a. m. CST - 01/17 /86 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: City Secretary Phone: 281-0041, ext 187 (214) 423-1423 QUANTITY 1 UNIT Each UNIT PRICE ~,510.00 TOTAL $08,510.00 - - I - 1 - 1986 LN-700D Ford Chassis with 1986 Tymco Model 600 Regenerative Air Sweeper I Sweeper meets or exceeds all specifica tions No exceptions taken . I - . I' NOTE - Addendum #1 Received and Noted - IL- . II ..- -.. .. r - It ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. SUB-TOTAL TOTAL BID ~~ SIO,~~ T TERMS N % 15 DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH IRICHLAND HILLS: DELIVERY IN 60-90 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Richland Hills Purchas- ing Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formali- ties, or to award purchases on an individual item basis when in its .t interests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXClUD- FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TEXAS. IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- CEPTANCE OF ANY OR All QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONSI- TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY: Industrial Disposal Supply Co. '. BY: Paul Hunt PHONENUMB~. (214) 423-1423 SIGNATURE: _ _~~ -[(ATE: 1-14-86 THIS IS NOT A PURCHASE ORDER _ I I I P GENERAL CONDITIONS I In submitting his bid, the proposer understands and agrees to be bound by the following terms and conditions: PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS 1. WITHDRAWING PROPOSALS I Proposals deposited with the City of North Richland Hills cannot be withdrawn prior to the time set for opening proposals. Request for nonconsideration of proposals must be made in writing to the Purchasing Agent and received by the City of North Richland Hills prior to the time set for opening proposals. After other proposals are opened and publicly read, the proposal for which nonconsideration is properly requested maybe returned unopened. The proposal may not be withdrawn after the bids have been opened, and the bidder, in submitting the same, warrants and guarantees that his bid has been carefully reviewed and checked and that it is in all things true and accurate and free of mistakes and that such bid will not and cannot be withdrawn because of any mistake committed by the bidder. I I I 2. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS I After proposals are opened and publicly read aloud, the proposals will be tabulated for comparison on the basis of the bid prices and quantities shown in the proposal. Until final award of the contract, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals,. to waive technicalities, and to readvertise for new proposals, or proceed to do the work otherwise in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. ~ I 3. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS I Proposals will be considered irregular if they show any Omissions, alterations of form, additions, or condit~ons not called for. unauthorized alternate bids, or irregularities of any kind. However, the City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interests of the City of North Richland Hills. I 4. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS I The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, and all proposals submitted are subject to this reservation. Proposals may be rejected, among other reasons, for any of the fOllowing specific reasons: I (a) Proposal received after the time limit for receiving proposals as stated in the advertisement. (b) Proposal containing any irregularities. (c) Unbalanced value of any items. (d) tVhere the bidder, any sub-contractor or Supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. I I . L I 10" I II I I I I I I '- I I I I I I I . I 5. DISQUALIFICATION OF ·BIDDERS Bidders may be disqualified and their proposals not considered, among other reasons, for any of the following specific reasons: (a) Reason for believing collusion exists among the bidders. (b) Reasonable grounds for believing that any bidder is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated. (c) Where the bidder, any sub-contractor or supplier, is in litigation with the City of North Richland Hills, or where such litigation is contemplated or imminent, in the sole opinion of said City. (d) The bidder being in arrears on any existing contract or having defaulted on a previous contract. (e) Lack of competency as revealed by a financial statement, experience and equipment, questionnaires, etc. (f) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the City of North Richland Hills will prevent or hinder the prompt completion of additional work if awarded. 6 · AWARD OF CONTRACT Award of contract, if it be awarded, will be made by the City of North Richland Hills to the lowest responsible bidder meeting the requirements of the City of North Richland Hills, and will be made within sixty (60) days after the opening of the proposal, but not before said City's next monthly meeting. No award will be made until after investigations are made as to the responsibilities of the low bidders. 7 . ASSIGNMENT The successful bidder may not assign his rights and duties under an award without the written consent of the City of North Richland Hills City Manager. Such consent shall not relieve the assignor of liability in the event of default by his assignee. 8. NOTICE OF DELAYS Whenever the vendor encounters any difficulty which is delaying or threatens to delay timely performance (including actual or potential labor disputes), the vendor shall immediately give notice thereof in writing to the Purchasing Agent, stating all relevant information with respect thereto. Such notice shall not in any way constitute a basis for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule or be construed as a waiver by the City of North Richland Hills of any rights or remedies to which it is entitled by law or pursuant to provisions herein. Failure to give such notice, however, may be grounds for denial of any request for an extension of the delivery or performance schedule because of such delay. 9. BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (This clause is applicable only when a "brand name or equal" purchase description is included in an invitation for bids. As used in this clause, the term "brand name" includes identification of products by make and model.) I I P I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I . I .--.-...- (a) If items for which bids have been called for have been identified by a "brand name or equal" description, such identification is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and is to indicate the quality and characteristics of products that will be satisfactory. Bids offering "equal" products will be considered for award if such products are clearly identified in the bids and are determined by the Purchasing Agent to be equal in all material respects to the brand name products referenced. (b) Unless the bidder clearly indicates in his bid that he is offering an "equal" product, his bid shall be considered as offering a brand name product referenced in the Invitation for Bids. I I P I I I I I I ~ I I I I I ·1 I . I GENERAL CONDITIONS EQUIPMENT BIDS 1. Equipment other than new models 1986 will not be considered as responsive to the specifications. It is the intention of the City of North Richland Hills to purchase based on the specifications, a standard production model. In addition to the equipment set out in the specifications, the units shall include all equipment set out in the manufacturer's literature as standard equipment. They shall include all exterior moldings, name plates, medallions, series identifications, and chrome of every description that is usual for standard stock models of this series. 2. The specifications are intended to govern, in general, the size and type of equipment desired and are minimum requirements. Variations from these specifications may be acceptable provided such variation, in each instance, is noted on the bid. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaluate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. 3. The unit shall be completely assembled, lubricated, adjusted, with all equipment including standard and extra equipment installed, and the unit made ready for operation. 4. Bidder must fill in all information asked for in the blanks provided under each item. Failure to compÌetely describe the equipment may result in rejection of the bid. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to evaÎuate variations from the specifications and its judgment in such matters shall be conclusive. 5. The bidder shall attach hereto, as part of this bid, regularly printed literature published by the factory, which sets forth and describes the equipment he proposes to furnish... 6. Manufacturer's standard warranty for parts and labor must be included in this bid. ï. For bids on more tha~ one unit of equipment, the City of North Richland R~¡:~ reserves the right to make multiple purchases from more than one bidder if it deems such action to be in its best interest. . I I P MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS FOR A TRUCK MOUNTED DUEL CONTROLLED VACUUM/REGENERATIVE AIR SWEEPER I. I All products offered in response to this bid shall be new. The sweeper shall not have been a dealer's demonstrator, reconditioned or used in any manner. I II. I Vendor Offering I A. Engine: (Drive) Diesel 8.5 litre 8.2 Litre - Detroit I B. Engine: (Auxiliary) Diesel 3.9 litre with shut down system John Deere 3.9 Litre C. Transmission: Allison heavy duty automatic Allison AT 545 I D. Gutter Broom: Left and right hand 43" dia. Left and Right ~ I III. Sweeper shall come equiped with the following equipment: I Check Compliance 1. Catch Basin Cleaner with hose and connection 10' hose w/52" nozzle, 2. Factory Air Air Conditioning I 3. Tinted Windows Yes I 4. High Visibility, back-up mirrors on West Coast & Parabol~c each side 5. Power Steering Yes I 6. Two Amber Beacons, one mounted on the cab, 2 Amber Beacons and one mounted on the top rear of the sweeper body I I 7. All clearance lights to meet State and State & Dot Lights Federal regulations 8. 12-foot filler hose 20 I Filler Hose II I 9. Rubber-lined blower Rubber Lined 10. Minimum 200 gallon water capacity 229 Gallons . I I It 11. Minimum 6 cubic yards hopper usable 7.3 Cubic Yards 12. Amber Arrow Board mounted on rear 2' x 4' Amber Arrow .Boa rd 13. Two operator manuals and two parts book Yes I IV. I A. Unit shall be fully ready to operate upon delivery. B. Warranty offered 12 months or 1,000 hours on sweeper I 12 months or 12,000 miles on chassis. I I c. Location of Repair Facility PIano, Texas --- in addition, Tymco offers a 2 day classroom service traininQ school in Waco. (see attached brochure) D. Parts available at PIano, Texas I -- I E. Vendor shall provide operator training at the City of North Richland Hills, for a minimum of one full working day, 8 hours Yes - also see training . brochure F. A demonstration may be required at the City of North Richland Hills, if requested. It shall be at the time and date specified by the Purchasing Agent of the City of North Richland Hills. I Vendor Agreement By I Signature Sales Manager I I I I . I -. I I " I I I I I I '- I I I I I I I III I The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be attached and further certify that our attached proposal submitted by Industrial (a) Disposal Supply Co. complies with all the specifications as outlined in the City of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it further specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors (b) No exceptions. And further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that the City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. Company Name Industrial Disposal Supply Co. By Paul Hunt G2~d-ø Title Sales Manager Date January 14, 1986 THIS ~ BE SUBMITTED ~ VENDOR QUOTATION Vendor Note: (a) Vendor: Company Name (b) Number of Exceptions, If None Write "NO" I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of J(ðrth Richland Hills~ Texas ~.¡// ~(! --:; =-- i' Addendum to Specifications for City of North Richland Hills Section II, Item A now reads Engine: Drive Diesel 8.5 Lite Change to read Engine: Drive Diesel 8.2 Litre Section III, Item 12 now reads Amber Arrow Board Mounted on Rear Change to read Amber Arrow Board Mounted on Rear must meet State Specifications (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E, LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118 I I I I I I I I ~ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 2-24-86 SUbject: Approval of Condemnation of Mr. & Mrs. Paul D. Learned I s Agenda Number: PU 86-7 Land for Hightower Road Right-of-Way The staff has been negotiating with Mr. Paul D. Learned since September of 1985, trying to purchase this right-of-way needed for Hightower Road, but we have not been successful in doing this. Attached is a copy of a letter written by the City Attorney for Mr. Riddle's signature offering to purchase the property, plus a copy of Mr. Learned's attorney's response. The details of this subject will be presented in executive session. Recommendation: The staff recommends to approve the condemnation of Mr. & Mrs. Paul D. Learned's property for the purpose of constructing Hightower Drive. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of I I f' I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I II t" I JAMESON & MAXWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE COMMERCE PLAZA 108 NORTH COMMERCE FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 (817) 336-6211 JIM JAMESON STEPHEN C. MAXWELL * ·CERTIFIED - PERSONAL INJURY TRIAL LAW ST ATE BAR OF TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION February 7, 1986 City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Attn: Gene Riddle; Rex McIntire; and City Manager I represent Paul and Nancy Learned who have a pending claim and suit against Wayne Wall because of a dispute that arose out of a tract of land in North Richland Hills City limits. We had the case settled wherein Mr. Wall was to pay Mr. & Mrs. Learned for damages and an easement for water line purposes, when as we understand it, the City of North Richland Hills stepped in, took the $10,000.00 from Mr. Wall, changed the language of the agreement to give the City of North Richland Hills an easement for all purposes, and sent a new document for Mr. Learned to sign. I have in hand a signed agreement from Mr. & Mrs. Learned granting to the City of North Richland Hills a water line easement, just like the Wall agreement, which I will deliver to you upon receipt of Mr. Wall',s $10, 000. 00 which you are holding. You should give this matter your ,immediate attention and discuss the import of Pennzoil vs. Texaco with your attorney. Please don't ignore this letter as the settlement with Mr. Wall has been agreed upon for a long time and only the actions of the City of North Richland Hills has prevented consummation of this agreement. JJ:vjd I~' -- I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of Xrth Richland Hills, Texas ~.\ '!~ ;r,,~ W February 6, 1986 REF: PWL-QOll-86 Mr. and Mrs. Paul D. Learned 7605 Hewitt Street N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Re: 0.502 Acres of land out of the William Cox Survey needed for street and utility purposes Dear Mr. & Mrs. Learned: The legal description of the 0.502 acre tract the City of North Richland Hills needs for street and utility purposes is attached hereto. The City has had the tract appraised and based upon the appraisal, makes you an offer of $15,000.00 for the 0.502 acre tract. Please let us hear from you within five days from receipt of this letter. Our attorney will prepare the necessary conveyances. The City needs to get this project completed as soon as possible. Sincerely, ~ Gene Riddle Director Public Works/Utilities ds encl. (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TX 76118 r .1.,' . . --..-- ~ I· · LEGAL DESCRIPTION ¡~ei~g a tract of land located in the William Cox Survey, Abstract No. 321, Tarrant I' County, Texas, and being a portion of the tract of land described in the deed to Ona Lavena Carpenter in Volume 6983, Page 57, of the Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Said tract of land being more particularly described by metes and bounds ~I! as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the West 1 ine of said Carpenter tract, lying NOoo34111"W I 67.58 feet from the most northerly Southwest corner of said Carpenter tract, said point lying by deed East 670.80 feet and N0034111"W 67.58 feet from the Northwest corner of the J. McComas Survey, Abstract No. 1040, Tarrant County, Texas; I THENCE N00034111"W 82.03 feet along West line to a point; I ì ì THENCE N88°21'1511E 70.09 feet along said North line to a point; THENCE Southerly 8.21 feet along a curve to the right, having a radius of 634.00 1._ feet, a central angle of 00°44132" and a chord bearing S12°11'l8"W 8.21 feet . to a point; iI THENCE S12°33'1311W 142.60 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the right; iI ì i i i i ¡e I EXHIBIT A THENCE Northeasterly 130.82 feet along a curve to the left, having a radius of 199.83 feet, a central angle of 37°30'30", and a chord bearing N3101814l1lE 128.49 feet to a point; THENCE N12°3313111E 133.61 feet to a point in the North line of said Carpenter tract, lying N88°21'1511E 98.23 feet from the Northwest corner of said Car- penter tract¡ THENCE Southwesterly 205.90 feet along said curve, having a radius of 267.83 feet, a central angle of 44°02'54" and a chord bearing S34°34159"W 200.87 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the right; THENCE Southwesterly 21.70 feet along s4id curve, having a radius of 634.00 feet, a central angle of 01°5713911 and a chord bearing S57°35'12"W 21.70 feet to the place of beginning, containing 0.502 acres of land. ~ --~---- -~- --------- HERBERT S. BEASlEY REGISTERfD PUBUC SURVEYOR EASLEY'· . Ltnc. - - .' rOOOQ'aph,r .' ... · - C"nSl'U,-Ioon SU<'''V'"'~ BR~NTY.,(Z>o cr PO AO'C 887, ~OAr WORTH fEXAS 16112 OA7J METRO 429-(\1nA 2-~ I 3 I a ~ 2. C£ III 28 .3 ' ~ . z:J ; ~ ~rj)f} \~~ 2.<1 e> ¡¡ 2.4- 7~ p..--rø ¢~ ",cOO q.:. ~~\~ 23 10 q ~ q, I ;;,"~'V C' ~~ (1'.(" P-cr. rL f(:. v "<183 P ..s-r¡ D. R. T: C. T I I B / 7 ~\). vJ~~ 1"_\-,\\0 H\o VIA YN£ WALL Bu ll...lJER /NC.. v. 7ð73 P J4..52 PR. T c". T i I f' I .JAMES ~. CRA/AJE -I- .JEAN 8. cRAINE '1.5.,.78 P /87 D. R. -r: C'. -r: /¡I/ -: /00 ' c. R. CR.~ ~ .JÖÝ M. Lfë;A~ V illJ P.~3 é). R. T. ~. r: I AN EXHIBIT OF A TRACT OF LAr~D .' LOCATED IN THE '~"; . WILLIAM COX SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 321 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS I I Ie I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I f' I I -- RESOLUTION NO. 86-11 WHEREAS, a public necessity exists to acquire a right-of-way over, under and through one certain tract of land belonging to Nancy and Paul D. Learned, to construct and maintain a permanent public street and thoroughfare; and, WHEREAS, the City of North Richland Hills, Texas has made an offer to the owners of the tract of land and the owners have not accepted said offer and the parties have not been able to agree upon purchase price and/or damages. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that: 1. The city attorney is authorized and directed to institute and prosecute eminent domain proceedings to acquire the permanent street right- of-way from Nancy and Paul D. Learned. 2. The tract of land belonging to Nancy and Paul D. Learned is described on Exhibit "Au attached hereto. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of February, 1986. APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: A<fmi'1ht-r:>tion Council Meeting Date: 2/24/R6 Subject: Eminent DOlDaiu P,-nceødings TO'- n'-:>in:>gø F.:>~E'mønt Agenda Number: PTT R6-R The City is requiring Western Oaks Addition to procure a drainage easment from H.V. Travis. The drainage easement is actually in the City of Keller. We must ask the City of Keller for authorization to proceed by eminent domain. Recommendation: Authorize City Attorney to proceed with Resolution for the City of Keller allowing North Richland Hills to exercise eminent domain on drainage easement needed for Western Oaks. I I , I I I I I Source of Funds: I Bonds (GO/Rev.) . Operating Budget I __ Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM L~~d City Manager , Finance Director Department Head Signature Page 1 of I -i CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Request to Deny Bid for Lighting at Richfield Park Council Meeting Date: 2/24/86 Agenda Number: PU 86-9 Subject: See attached memo from Dennis Horvath to the Mayor and City Council explaining circumstances and actions taken regarding Richfield Park lighting. Recommendation: Reject bid from Riley Service, Inc., in the amount of $178,740. I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available R 1if~ ~ City Manager . Finance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I P I I I I I I -- I I City of J(ðrth Richland Hills, Texas February 20, 1986 Ref: ACMM 0053-86 Memo to: Mayor and City Council From: Dennis Horvath Assistant City Manager Subject: Richfield Park Lighting Problem The Council has been aware for some time that there are serious problems with lighting at Richfield Park. The problem is further compounded by the exclusive use of Richfield Park by RYA for their summer youth activities. We have attempted to get the problem identified and corrected in a timely fashion so as not to disrupt RYA activities. Specific of problems include: 1) 2) The possibility of exposed wires inside the poles The possibility of shorts within the poles The depth at which the power lines are buried 3) 4) Shorts within the switching gear 5) Other possible unknown hazards TESCO has now turned off all the power to the park and in the op~n~on of TESCO officials and the Staff it is not in the interest of public safety to return power to the park until the entire electrical system is brought up to code. The problem first came to light in a memo to the Purchasing Agent in early July, 1985. The Purchasing Agent asked the Parks Director and the building official to study the problem and recommend necessary action. (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP a20/p.o. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118 I ~ I I I I I I I '~ I I I I I I ~ I I Page Two On September 12, 1986, after a thorough investigation, the bUilding official notified the Parks Department, via a detailed interoffice memo, of the serious nature of the problem. On September 18, 1985 Gifford Electric made a preliminary estimate of $25,000 to correct the problem. Also on September 18, 1985 the ~arKS vepartment, through the City Manager's office, authorized Knowlton-English-Flowers to proceed with preparation of construction plans and specifications for electrical wiring improvements at Richfield Park. On the same date Knowlton- English-Flowers authorized Mr. Charles R. McCreary to proceed with these plans. On January 1, 1986 the City Council approved an authori ation of $100,000 for.; electrical repair at Richfield Park. ~ The completed plans and specifications were advertised in accordance with State Law on February 4th and February 11, 1986. An Addendum was published on February 16th (we hoped that the last minute change on the addendum would reduce construction costs). In an effort to work with the RYA schedule, we asked bidders for three bids, one for a completion date of April, one in May and one in June. We hoped, at that time, that the April date would be acceptable and RYA could proceed with their 0 On February 18th, 1986 bids were open and we received one bid for $178,740 with a June completion date. We recommend the Council reject this An RYA representative, Mr. George Tillotson, III. attended the bid opening and is fully aware of this problem. At that time he suggested that RYA only play day games this season and that they could possibly make up games on Sunday or use fields in other cities as a backup. He also suggested that they could use a van for concession purposes. We concur with his recommendations. This matter has been discussed with Ms. Linda Turk, President of RYA and a User Contract has been signed to that effect. We propose that this matter be further studied and the job rebid this summer with more time for the contractors to bid and also more time to complete the job. We anticipate that this will lower the bids. We believe that RYA is aware of and understands the dilemma, however this letter is written to inform the Council of actions taken thus far. DH/gp I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I '- I I . . KNOWl TON-E NGLlSH-FlOWERS~ INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas February 20, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North R;chland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North R;chland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-232, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ~!CHFIELD PARK ELECTRICAL IMPVTS. BID TABULATION In accordance with your instructions, bids were received on February 18, 1986, for the referenced project. This project inludes complete electrical system renovation of the Richfield Park complex as required to make it a safe facility. Bids for construction of the proposed improvements were received from only one (1) contractor. The single bid was received from Riley Electric Service & Engineering, Inc., 4000 W. Vickery Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas, 76107, in the amount of $178,740.00 for Proposal "C" which is based on a contract completion date of June 15, 1986. The contractor elected not to bid Proposals "A" and "B" which were based on completion dates of April 15, 1986, and May 15, 1986, respectively. The engineer's estimate was $125,000. We would recommend that the contract not be awarded at this time. We further recommend, based on discussion with an RYA representative, that the project be readvertised for bidding in July or August, 1986, after the RYA daytime baseball schedule is complete. If prospective contractors are given a longer time to evaluate the project and a longer completion schedule, the total project bid amount should be reduced significantly. We will be available at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this prcject. Meanwhile, please do not hesitate to call. /~W, ~ RICHARD w. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cC:7t~r. Rodger N. Line, City t.1anager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works. Mr. Dave Petika, Parks and Recreation Director Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Riley Electric Service & Engineering, Inc. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD. TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 ., METRO/267.3367 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PW 86-5 2-24-86 SUbject: A roval of Street Reconstruction by Tarrant County Precinct 3 I The County Commissioner of Precinct 3 has requested that we send him a list of projects that we might want him to do for us during the spring and summer of 1986. The types of projects that we are recommending to you to approve, would be reconstructing some streets in the same manner that the County reconstructed Rumfield Road and Eden Road. The only obligation the City has is to pay for the material to do this work. The streets that we recommend you approve for reconstruction in this manner are Cardinal Lane, from Martin to Davis; Amundson Road, from Main to Walter Street; Kirk Lane, from Rumfield to Precinct Line; and, Crane Road from Amundson to Martin. I I I If you approve these projects, then a letter should be written for the Mayor's signature asking the County to rebuild these streets. I I Recommendation: I The staff recommends to approve the above projects and requesting the County Commissioner of Precinct 3 to rebuild these streets. I I I I I ~ I- I Finan~e Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) gf;;~:;dUdget , r¿~~ Department Head Signature Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM ~~ City Manager . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I BOB HAMPTON COUNTY COMMISSIONER PRECINCT NO.3 TARRANT COUNTY NORTHEAST GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 645 GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY HURST, TEXAS 76054 (817) 485.9331 January 31, 1986 Honorable Mayor Dan Echols City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 pear Mayor Echols: As you are aware, during the past year, Precinct 3 has assisted its cities in street work. Based on the work completed by Tarrant County Precinct 3, the county was able to provide to its cities nearly 13,000 man-hours of labor totaling $131,494 in salaries. In addition, the equipment utilized in this effort was estimated to total $301,175. This year we again look forward to providing assistance to the cities of Precinct 3. We have acquired, in the last few days, a PUlverizer and some additional equipment. which should enable us to be of greater assistance to the cities. I am asking that each city council act and establish its priorities for projects for which county assistance is desired. Please include in your coun~il action the designation of a person to sign interlocal agreements with the county for the projects. After my office receives and assesses all of the cities' requests, we will be contacting your staff regarding the scheduling of projects. Be assured that we will address as many of the requests as Possible within our time and labor limitations. We appreciate the opportunity to assist you in your efforts and look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, ~ Bob Hampton County Commissioner Precinct No. 3 BH/mq f 1 I I 1 j I i I I I I I I I I I 1 ~ ~ , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Utility Council Meeting Date: 2-24-86 Subject: Proposed Sewer Rate Increase and New Proposed Contract for Sewer ransportatlon an Treatment Wlt t e lty of Fort Worth Agenda Number: PW 86-6 For approximately a year the staff has been dealing with Fort Worth concerning a new sewer agreement between the two cities and new rates for treatment and transportation of sewage. Fort Worth has also been proposing the same agreement and rates with twenty other entities, which they serve. It is felt that, in most of these entities, these rates and these new agreements are not acceptable. During our last meeting with the City of Fort Worth staff, one of the mayors of one of the cities that contracts with Fort Worth, made the statement that the Mayors Council was to consider this item on their January agenda. After that meeting the staff of Some of the larger customer cities decided that we should recommend that all of the entities join together to secure an independent study of the sewer rates that the City of Fort Worth proposes to charge. The City of Arlington has the largest amount of flow into the City of Fort Worth, North Richland Hills is its number two user of this service, and Hurst is number three. The staff in the following cities have agreed to recommend to their councils to participate in the study of the sewer rates that Fort Worth is proposing. These cities are Arlington, North Richland Hills, Hurst, Haltom City, Burleson, Saginaw, Edgecliff Village, and Tarrant County Mud #1. It is likely that when the other twelve entities are contacted, that most of them will probably participate in the study. The approximate cost of this rate study is proposed to be $75,000. Of that amount the proposed amount for North Richland Hills is $12,750, however the staff is proposing to set aside $15,000 for our share of this study in case we have to pay extra, because some cities may not participate. The Mayors Council did meet in January, and I attended this meeting with Mayor Echols and we presented the proposed rate study at that time to the Mayor&, Council. When this subject came up, the Chairman of the Mayors Council then appointed a committee of the mayors, with Mayor Echols as chairman to make a recommendation back to the Mayors Council. The committee of the Mayors Council did meet and decided to recommend to all the entities involved with sewer treatment and transportation in the Fort Worth system that they participate in this study. The Utility Director for the City of Arlington and myself have had conversations with the Utility Director for the City of Fort Worth, and his attitude has been less than agreeable, and he suggested that after the study is done, that we may want to take this case to the water rights commission in Austin, to let them settle the matter of the rates. We have indicated to him that there is a matter of the new agreements between the cities to be resolved, and that these rate studies do not resolve the problems involved in the agreements, and that the cities in some manner are going to have to sit Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget _ Other fu --'"'. ~ ~-- Öepartment Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available /' Mð1~f0~ City Manager , Finance Director Page 1 of 2 I Ie I I I I I I I IIÞ I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 Proposed sewer rate study down and see how we can resolve all of the problems. We have a lot of paper work on this matter including the proposed agreement between the City of Fort Worth and the customer cities and also the study that Fort Worth had done by Black and Veatch. If any of the city council wishes more details on this matter, feel free to call me at any time and I would be glad to get whatever extra information you might need. Funding Source: The Utility Sewer System Budget does not have funds appropriated for unanticipated rate studies. It is recommended that funds be appropriated from Utility Retained Earnings to the following account: 02-11-02-4800 $15,000 Recommendation: The staff recommends to approve the participation in the study by the City of North Richland Hills and appropriate $15,000 for our share plus contingency. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Ie I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I Ie I PANNELL KERR FORSTER Certified Pubfic Accountants December 17, 1985 6500 Greenville Avenue Suite 200 Dallas. TX 75206 Telephone (214) 369-1551 Cable PANKERR DALLAS Mr. Gene Riddle Director of Utilities City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Mr. Riddle: I have completed my initial review of the report on Outside City Wholesale Wastewater Service Rates prepared by Black & Veatch for the City of Fort Worth. My preliminary review of the limited information presented in this study indicates the fOllowing issues: A. Investment (Rate Base) o The study proposes utilizing a fair value rate base of $254,434,000 based upon a 60% weighting of original cost net of depreciation and 40% reconstructed cost new net of an allowance for age and condition. This balance should be throughly analyzed to determine its appropriateness as to the original cost components, the actual calculation of reconstruction cost new, allowance for and condition, establishment of the estimated reserve for depreciation on original cost and.. the specific weighting given these com- ponents. Under Texas law the fair value weighting can range from a high of 60% original cost, 40% RCND (used in this study) to a low of 75% original cost, 25% RCND. B. Test Year Operating Income o Use of a projected test year ending September 30, 1986. Source detail of all expense items. Appropriateness of undisclosed allocations of City Administrative expenses and other overhead eXpenses e.g. data processing, motor pool, etc. Appropriateness of functionalization of expenses i.e. volume, capacity, strength and customer. o o o . . I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I Mr. Gene Riddle -2- December 16, 1985 c. Rate of Return o Study recommends an 8.5 percent fair rate of return on base year investment and 11 percent on excess over base year investment. These unsuEEorted returns appear extremely excessive when compared with investor owned utilities currently being granted fair rates of returns in the ranges from 5.5 to 6.5 percent. o The study is deficient in the following: o Fails to present any type of capital structure. Fails to present the embedded cost of debt. Fails to quantify and qualify any equity investment. o o D. Allocation Factors o The study utilizes 1983 "normalized" volume data. Since more recent data is available and since 1983 was an extremely abnormal climatic year we would propose utilizing to most recent twelve months of volume data. o The results of the allocations appear abnormally skewed to common to all. o The assumptions utilized in developing volume and characteristics of unmetered and untested flow disclosed and should be analyzed throughly. loading are no t o A one percent volume adjustment for infiltration/inflow from point of connection for OCL customers in total seems excessive. .. E. Base/Excess Over Base Approach- o Based upon the information presented we would strongly disagree with this approach which is premised upon the assump- tion that system growth and replacement is 70% attributable to GCL customers. The above issues are of course only of few which have been identified from a very abbreviated review of Black & Veatch's Report. There are three ways to approach a project of this nature which are as follows: 1) To perform an in-depth review and analysis of Black & Veatch's report and supporting work papers to substantiate sufficient defi- ciencies requiring the study to be discarded and re-performed by the City of Fort Worth. This approach would cost approximately $35,000.00 in fees. ... ~ .. I I Ie I I I I I I lit I I I I I I I (' I - Mr. Gene Riddle -3- December 17, 1985 2) Same as approach 1) above with the identification of key issues, e.g. rate of return etc., and to develop alternatives in these areas to arrive at new revenue requirements and rates. This approach would cost approximately $55,000 to $60,000 in fees. 3) To conduct a new cost of service study in its entirety completely discarding the approach and data presented by Black & Veatch. This approach would cost approximately $75,000 in fees. I I have enclosed my resume and that of Mr. Daniel L. Jackson, a Partner in the firm of Pannell Kerr Forster, for your review. The firm of Pannell Kerr Forster, an international Certified Public Accounting firm headquartered in Houston, Texas would be assisting in an engagement of this nature. If you have any questions regarding this information, please do not hesitate- to contact me at 214-369-1551 or 214-692-1586. Happy H2a~/~ ack E. Stowe, Jr., President Aries Resource Management Contracted to Pannell Kerr Foster Enclosures JES:kb -. I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works 2/24/86 Department: n-::-=-:r Council Meeting Date: Appraisal of Parcels of Land for the Watauga Roaa Subject: Right-of-Way Agenda Number: PW 86-7 The Watauga Road Project is a large project and the acquisition of right-of-way is going to be time consuming. The Staff feels that we should start out by having the parcels appraised and then make our offers to acquire based on the appraisals. Then if the property owners refuse our offer, we can immediately start processing that parcel for condemnation. The City Council previously had allocated $408,605 for engineering on that project with no funds appropriated for right-of-way. After review with City Staff, and our Engineers, it is our recommendation that part of the engineering budget be reallocated to partially fund the right-of-way acquisition and the appraisal study. The cost for the total appraisal of all the parcels will not exceed $12,000. We have enclosed a letter from the appraiser outlining how he intends to do the appraisal and the cost involved. Funding Source: It is the recommendation that the following amounts be reallocated: From ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 13-01-85-4200 13-20-85-4200 Engineering Unspecified Streets $300,000 70,000 TO 13-01-85-6050 Right-of-Way $370,000 Recommendation: The Staff recommends that funds be reallocated as described above and that James K. Norwood, Inc. be retained for the appraisal on parcels of land for the Watauga Road Project for an amount not to exceed $12,000. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other '~A.O ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review 1985 GO Bonds Acct. Number see above ~nds Available ~- . Finance Director City Manager - Page 1 of 1 Ie I JAMES K, NORWOOD, MAl DONALD J. SHERWOOD, MAl I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I I . "rJ ;I , ~ 111 JAMES K. NORWOOD, INC. Real Estate Appraisers February 7, 1986 INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS: AMERICAN SOCIETY OF RURAL APPRAISERS (ARA) AMERICAN INSTITUTE REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS (MAl) Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: Watauga Road Improvement Project Dear Mr. Riddle: As requested, I am sUbmitting a proposal to prepare appraisals on 17 parcels of land in connection with the proposed right-of-way improvement project along Watauga Road from Rufe Snow Drive to Davis Boulevard in North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas. Due to the scope and nature of the appraisal assignment, our firm proposes to prepare the reports in two volumes. Volume I will contain the basic data pertinent to each parcel including a general location map, summary of salient facts and conclusions, contingent and limiting conditions, purpose of the appraisal, function of the appraisal, definition of market value, estate appraised, area and neighborhood data, the appraisal process and general analysis used to determine highest and best use and valuation methods concerning the part acquired. Volume I will also contain all of the sales investigated in the market study and a comparable sales .ma-p. Volume II will be prepared for each individual parcel and will contain the pertinent data and value conclusions applicable to each parcel. Included in Volume II will be a summary of salient facts and conclusions, ownership data, description of the property, highest and best use, applicable approach to value, comparison of comparable data to subject and value estimates. A brief analysis of the part taken and effects of the project will also be included in Volume II. The only sales which will be incl uded in Vol ume II wi 11 be those that are directly analyzed with the individual parcel. Due to the scope of the project, we feel this is the most cost effective way to provide adequate appraisals for each parcel. Also, this procedure will meet the minimum requirements as set forth by the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers. The cost of Volume I will range between $3,000 to $3,400, whereas 7001 GRAPEVINE HWY" SUITE 332 · FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118 . PHONE _ ,(817) 284-2222 I . w f ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I the cost of each Volume II report will be $500. It is our understanding that a total of 17 parcels are involved in the proposed project. The addition or subtraction of a parcel will be made at $500 per report. Upon acceptance of this proposal, we are prepared to deliver to you the appraisals within four to six weeks. In order to complete the appraisal assignment, I am requesting that you furnish to me the current Owner of record for each parcel, together with an address and phone number in order to make owner contact. Also, it would be helpful to have a total property acreage for each whole property involved in the appraisal assignment as well as current zoning and utility maps for this general area. If you have any questions regarding this appraisal assignment, please do not hesitate to call. Should you desire to proceed with the appraisals, please notify us in writing as soon as Possible. Thank you for considering OUr firm for this appraisal assignment. Respectfully sUbmitted, D~.~Sherwood' DJS:jr Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ gihe;~ting ~dg"et . ~ IC . ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ þ~ Department Heàd Signatu e . , Ci Ý Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I, I I I I I ~ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works SUbject: - Council Meeting Date: 2-24-86 Pay Estimate 1 and Finql for Storm n~Ain Tmprovempnr~ in Smithfield Acres Agenda Number: PAY 86-13 This payment is for the overS1Zlng of the storm drain system in this portion of Smithfield Acres. The developer has paid his share of this storm drain. The storm drain is now 100% complete and accepted by the City of North Richland Hills. The city's participation in this project is $52,098.80. Recommendation: The staff recommends to approve the payment of $52,098.80 to Huffman and Huffman Inc. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I ~.#t. ,. Ie President GARY HUFFMAN I (214) 436-4127 I I Icem No. I 1 2 I 3 ~ I 5 6 I~ 9 HUFFMAN & HUFFMAN.' INC. "UNDERGROUND UTilITIES" 401 SO, NORMAN · EULESS. TEXAS 76040 Mailing Address: 243 Ridgeway Circle lewisviJle, Texas 15067 PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT Vice President H.M. HUFFMAN Metro (811) 267-2154 Periodical Eatimate No 1 st & Final Dati> December 1 J 1985 Name of Owner' CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS .\ddrea.: N f Coatrac:tor: HUFFMAN & HUFFMAN. INC Addreu: ame 0 SMITHFIELD ACRES (STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS) DON STORM. DEVELOPER Type of Project· _ I 11 DESCRIPTION OF ITEM Unit of Meature Channel Excavation 5'x6' Culvert With Type B Head~~ll 511" Type B.Headwall 5ijfl R.C.P. Class III 5.5'x5.5' Drop Inlet 118" R.C.P. Class III . 5'x5' Junction Box 20' Curb Inlet 36" R.C.P. Class III ll'x~' Junction Box 2" Asphalt Replacement Extra Work C.Y. L.F. Each L.F. Each L.F. Each Each L.F. Each 8.Y. Extra Height on Wing S. end of B.C. Each ~4Cl7n~#~ , N~~ Date Approved: I I~n~ payment P~~~ð. I By Quantity Original Eatimate 885 40 1 30 1 160 1 2 71~ 1 90 ° Quantity Completed to Date 885 40 1 30 1 160 1 1 760 1 66 1 to Total Value of Original Contract Perfonned . Material. on Hand-Attached Statemert Extra Work-Total Thru Last Estimate Extra Work Since Last Estimate . . . . . Total Value of Work To Date . . . Leu: Amount ReQined % Total To Be Paid To Date . . . . . . Leu: Amount of Previous Payments . . . BALANCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE Januarv 17. 1986 Unit Pric. 3. 10 $ 300.00 ' 11198.00 82.00 3000.00 60 .·18 21100.00 IlOOO.OO 38.117 2500.00 35.00 200.00 I I . . - . . - . . - , V &.tue 01 Completed Work 2,743.50 12,000.00 1,498.00 2,460.00 3,000.00 9,628.80 2,400.00 4,000.00 29,237.20 2,500.00 2,310.00 200.00 71 . 977 . 50 -0- 200.00 72 , II í . :>0 -0- 72,177.50 -0- 72,177.50 Cit)' of ~fth Rich\and 1\i\lS.,1'e~as l'\a"tc.h 6, 1986 ?"\J'ß1..1.C ~O't1.C"E . £' ~o"tth ~::i.c.hland lli1ls, i1 f. the C1.tJ 01- · · 'the CitJ counc. 0 ~. a1 League of. C1.t1.es . . end the ~'at1.on 'tè~as, ~1.ll att h ld in ~ashington, D.C., conf.e~enc.e to pe e l-\a:t:c.h 7th-12th, 1986. . th the o-pen l-\eeting l..a\o1· 'this notiC.e is in c.om-plianc.e \011. ,ß609. NOP-1\'\ P-\c\'\v,NO \,\\\..\..s,1£)(þ..S 16' '8 28,-004' .130' N, £, \..001' 820·1',0, eO)(