HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1986-03-24 Agendas
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
FI
i01
'I
' ,
¡il;1
'il
;;1
'51
el
iil
~., - .<-,.-.¡.-... ; "
~.
'./¡;''j';'''4::;'>;~~,~':õt~~~,~~~~tat~~1~ª~~,",.ff¡~~ '
PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 24, 1986 - 6:00 P.M.
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 Northeast Loop 820.
NUMBER
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
1.
Discussion of elP Meeting to be
held March 27, 1986
(Mayor Pro Tem Davis)
2.
Committee Report on Televising
of Council Meetings
(Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilman
Fisher, and Councilwoman Hinkle)
3. GN 86-21 Schematic Design of Community
Center and Library
(Agenda Item No. 26)
4. PZ 86-56 Discussion of Future Land Use
Plan and Master Plan Te(t _
Final Components of
Comprehensive Master Plan and
Memorandum with Map Corrections
to the Future Land Use Plan
(Agenda Item No.8)
5. GN 86-17 Consideration of Amendment to
Ordinance No. 1080
(Agenda Item No. 22)
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- ~:=t- '.
Page 2
".
'':;;:'1\:::",,'';'';' 'c' 'co c:"c·~ÃY.~_~"t'-'-'h'''''''"''''''''''"''''''''''''''"''''~~''''~'''~~",__ .. ',.,. ,"',...._.""..""'.,,.,,,.. c . .,......~ '. """."","""""",
NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN
6. GN 86-25 Ordinance Regulating Solicitation
(Agenda Item No. 29)
7. PW 86-10 Change Order 83 on Morgan
Meadows East Drainage
(Agenda Item No. 33)
8.
Participation in State
Department of Highways Public
Transportation Program for
Litter Control
9.
Other Items
10.
*Executive Session to Discuss
Land, Personnel, and/or
Litigation
*Closed due to subject matter as provided by the
Open Meetings Law
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ADDENDUM TO
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 24, 1986
8a.
PZ 85-69
PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
.. Reconsideration of PZ 85-69 - Request
of Earl McKinney, Trustee, to rezone
a portion of Tracts 1 and 1B, E. A.
Cross Survey;-Abstract 281 and a
portion of Tract 3, William Cox Survey,
Abstract 321, from AG (Agriculture) to
C-l (Commercial) (Located on the east
side of Davis Boulevard north of
Odell Street) (Denied at the February 10,
1986 Meeting)
8b.
Ordinance No. 1272
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MARCH 24, 1986
For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers,
7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m.
NUMBER
I .
ITEM
eall to Order
ACTION TAKEN
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Special Presentation by Councilwoman Moody
5. Minutes of the Regular Meeting February 24,
1986
6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda
7. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by
Asterisk (18, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28,
29, 30, 31, 32, 33 & 34)
8. PZ 85-56 Approval of Future Land Use Plan
and Master Plan Text - Final
Components of Comprehensive Master
Plan, Ordinance No. 1350
9. PZ 86-1 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
- Request of M.F. Martin to rezone
Tract 5, William D. Barnes Survey,
Abstract 146, from AG
(Agriculture) to R-2 (Single
Family) (Located on the north side
of John Autrey Road east of Red
Oak Drive)
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>;;¡;¡"~";W'~'''>'
NUMBER
12.
13.
14.
:~~':;~._:.. :.~~;:.:-~~i~~~~J;~~:~~~-t~-:,';~ .
ITEM
~, . - ' <, 'L.' -~, ,>'~, , . "~.~J"''''''''''''''''~' ~:.." ~<..;t;F;o"~I~';" ' ,
10.
Ordinance No. 1351
11.
PZ 86-2
PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
- APPEAL HEARING -Request of
Bryan's Fast Stop to rezone part
of Lot 5R, Block 4, Richland
Terrace Addition, from LR (Local
Retail) to LR-SU-Sale of Beer for
Off-Premise Consumption (Located
in the existing commercial strip
center on the northeast corner of
Susan Lee Lane and Loop 820)
Ordinance No. 1352
PZ 86-3
PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
- Request of J.T. Concepts, Texas
Beverage Co. to rezone part of Lot
3R, Block 2, Snow Heights North
Addition, from C-l (Commercial) to
C-1-SU-Sale of Alcoholic
Beverages) (Located in the
existing commercial center on the
northeast corner of Rufe Snow
Drive and Northeast Loop 820)
Ordinance No. 1353
-
Page 2
.....:..,..~::-C: .
. ' :~.:-
, "--"'~""~'~:';'.,.,:: ··~H~~¡'-",;~,_...,: ",.,,_>.>,
ACTION TAKEN
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"-=~:\lt:iwt¡mUl ~Tœ';-.''''''
Page 3
" ·,i;:it_~.~~'~fL·'D,
~~--~ .,..,~ ~-~
. '
-.. '=;'~\';;'';''''~'~'-''''-''~1>~~1i:Oa~;.:e~J'~' ,.. "''''''~~''''W''''c;'':{~~~'¡;'''?::!;'~'''''''~~~''''o''':;'';<':.':''''
ACTION TAKEN
15. PZ 86-4
PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING
- Request of Frank Lynch to rezone
Tract 5, S. Richardson Survey,
Abstract 1266, from AG
(Agriculture) to R-2 (Single
Family) (Located on the north side
of Green Valley Drive west of
Davis Boulevard)
16. Ordinance No. 1354
17. PZ 86-5 Request for an Appeal Hearing on
PZ 86-5
*18. PS 85-99 Request of H & S Partnership for
Final Plat of Royal Court Addition
(Located on the east side of
Glenview Drive north of Diamond
Loch Addition)
*19. PS 86-6
Request of J P I Land Inc., for
Final Plat of Foster Village
Section 19 (Located on the east
side of Rufe Snow Drive west of
Douglas Lane and north of the
existing Foster Village Addition)
20. SO 86-5 Request for Variance to the Sign
Ordinance for Northwood Plaza
Shopping Center
*21. GN 86-16 Haltom/Richland Chamber Dues
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~-~~
*26.
*28.
*29.
*30.
.
_.,-~."~ -.: .~. - -,.~:;::~;.:~ .-----
Page 4
>-ê~~ilm1œL:,~;:.
~ -" -,,' "',
.'-- . c..·-"":"'-~:"'-:¡'~'Y:~¡"'!'-"""""'.-'¡'~~'~~:---;-~·'"t'''·''''':!''~~;~~~!'i~1~~~!i!f.::;"'~"..;__?,.,:,.:.._
ITEM
ACTION TAKEN
22.
GN 86-17 Consideration of Amendment. to
Ordinance No. 1080, Ordinance No.
1337
*23.
GN 86-18 Authorization to Participate with
the City of Arlington in
Wastewater Service Rates Study,
Resolution No. 86-13
*24.
GN 86-19 Approval of Contract for Bank-Wire
Transfer of Sales Tax
*25.
GN 86-20 Ordinance Adopting Section 207(k)
of the Fair Labor Standards Act _
Ordinance No. 1355
GN 86-21 Schematic Design of Community
Center and Library
27.
GN 86-23 PreSentation of Audited Financial
Statement for Year Ending
September 30, 1985
GN 86-24 Ordinance for Speed Limit,
Ordinance No. 1356
GN 86-25 Ordinance Regulating Solicitation,
Ordinance No. 1357
GN 86-26 Appointment of Assistant City
Secretary
-
I
I
;_~,¡',~;o;;;,oo:;,':~"",.:,
NUMBER ITEM
~~'.1';';'
Page 5
~z:
"
. ~'.',! .~. .:.'.1.>-.."'f·.......'· ~"F~ ~.'.i.4l(:..w."'."""""-~'~,;_..:.".~: ~-.-...,.'~"'~;ic"'f;;~~.r¡r.-r...~~!~,l!~:.r;,"""
I
I
ACTION TAKEN
I
I
*31. PU 86-10 Ratification of Expenditure from
Capital Improvement Funds,
Resolution No. 86-12
*32. PW 86-9 Change Order 83 on Chapman Drive
Paving and Drainage Improvements
I
I
I
I
*33. PW 86-10 Change Order 83 on Morgan Meadows
East Drainage
*34. PAY 86-14 Final Payment of Langlitz
Wilkerson for Fire Station Number
One in the Amount of $28,253.00
I
I
35. Citizen Presentation
Mr. Charles Owen
President, Haltom/Richland Chamber of
Commerce
Re: Change in Name of Chamber of
Commerce
I
I
I
I
I
36. Adjournment
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
City of J\.8rth RichJand Hills, Texas
MEMORANDUM
March 24, 1986
TO:
City Council
Richard Royston ai
Director of Planning and Development
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Map Corrections to the Future Land Use Plan
At the work session of the City Council and the Planning and Zoning
Commission several areas were identified on the Future Land Use which
will have to be corrected prior to final printing of the map. The
following is a list of those corrections. These should be noted in
the action of the City Council in adopting the Future Land Use Map.
1. The McKinney tract on the east side of Davis Boulevard north
of Odell Street should reflect the proposed use as Commercial and
Residential rather than Industrial.
2. The two small tracts fronting Watauga Road in front of the
City's Service Center are existing commercial tracts.
3. The duplex use on the southeast corner of Smithfield Road and
Continental Trail was not approved and will be residential.
4. The southwest corner of Wilson Lane and Smithfield Road was
approved for commercial use.
5. The tract on the north side of Green Valley Drive west of
Davis Boulevard should be a residential use.
6. The tract east of Davis Boulevard at Eden Road should be a
residential use.
7. The Engler tract on the south side of Watauga Road east of
the City Service Center has made application for Commercial Zoning.
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
r
-
II.
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
\ , \J~
\ p_r
~ \~..
v' .:
. \ {oj
'- j \\ f
,
~~\. \' T £ -t"1 \I'
* "'!~ *
<9 " ""
~ v
~UT\\
Keep Texas Beautiful, Inc.
P.o. BOX 2251 · AUSTIN. TEXAS 78768 · 512/478.8813
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Governor's Community Achievement Award entrants
FROM:
Keep Texas Beautiful, Inc.
DATE:
January 28, 1986
SUBJECT: New Litter Enforcement Program
----------------------------------------------------------------
The State Highway Department's new Litter Enforcement Incentives
Program is here, and all Texas communities are eligible to take
advantage of it immediately. Keep Texas Beautiful, Inc., is
assisting the Highway Department in promoting the program
throughout the state.
We're hoping for statewide participation in the enforcement
program, but believe it is especially important to the 150-plus
cities that have indicated their intent to compete for the
Governor's Community Achievement Awards this year. Remember that
enforcement accounts for 10 percent of the overall Governor's
Awards criteria.
Enclosed is an advance copy of Volume 3 of KTB's Leadership
Update, devoted entirely to the Highway Department's new program.
Also enclosed are copies of the official program guidelines and
the actual contract to be entered into by the State and
participating cities.
We are pleased to be able to share this information with you on
the first anniversary of the Highway Commission's vote to
establish its $4 million anti-litter campaign.
cc: KAB System Coordinators
KTB District Governors
KTB County Coordinators
KTB Board Members
KTB Advisory Board Members
PRESIDENT
Dr. William R. F.a, Waœ
O'flClOI 01 Pfanrwrtg. Cdy 01 Waco
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT
Ebby H.'1tct.y Acere, Dalal
Ebb)' HøJllday R.lItots. Jnc,
TREASURER
Carron w. Sturg'a. Waco
Grea'er W«:o 8&tut6abon Aan.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Mary Ellen Shoop. AUSM
BOARD MEMBERS
Maurie. A~ra. Dallas and Austin
Aan In\lflSlmeftl CotnpwJy
Dr. D. Lance Bullard, Bryan-College Station
Texas A&M ExlflfISIOfI Senfce
Grace Cartwright. Wealhatford
Ollie Leac»r, Rancl1.,
Nancy Chancellor. lulkin
Angeina 8auÞ1tJIOean
BeM' Chllda. Freeøon
Dow ChernicM. U.S.A.
Ed Davl.. San AnIonio
ÐeauÞIy San AnfOnio Assn.
Larry Emard, Grand Prarie
~ RecycJutg ComøIny, Inc.
Ben, Engllah. GreenYille
GREAT Cornminø
David A. Ferguaon. Wact)
Waco Convenllion & VISitor. SUfNU
Sadie Ray Ora". San Antonio
Buulily s.n A~ Aan,
Jack E. Hillman. Houston
Hlllrryn Distribu*ng Company
Dan Hopklna. Dalal
Clean OM/as Inc.
Authe Jackaon. Grand Pr.wïe
City Council Membet
Betty Johnaon. PatesIine
Te.. Gwden Clubs. Inc.
Dr. Dan Kamp, lubbock
City 01 Lubbock Parks Mtd RectNIiott
Ron KerchevUIe. Austin
Keep Austn BNutiIcJ, Inc.
N.1da L..... Kilgore
Kilgore ""~A--.
Robert Uebrock. Midand
Clean Midand Inc.
George McKinney. 0IIIaa
Tex., POwtN & Light ComøIny
Ed Phelpa. Sulphur Sønngs
HoøIiins County ChImbtN 0/ eam..c.
Jo Aooaa, Baytown
Ba)'fOwn CINn City Commaron
"O.P.· SeMMel, s.n AntoniO
Bautfy San ÑID1IO AtM.
.. Legrand SIma. Dalla
Conï~ Can ComøIny. U S.A
Wllllem Sny_, CotøuI 0viIIi
KAS System, c;o,pcA OJMaINueces County
Jullat Staudt. GahIesIon
0Nn GaIvesIon Inc
France. 'Iu,.., Waco
GrNItIt Waco ~ Assn.
O-oFFIClO
CnJt A. .t.".... AuIIin
~ 01 Higltw.... and Public T~
Tom H. Teytoc. AUIIin
~0I Highways ant1 PIIt*: T~
~
~
P.O. BOX 2251 · AUSTIN, TEXAS 78768 · 512/478..8813 '
PUBLISHED 30 WEEKS PER YEAR
FEBRUARY 3, 1986
Dear Keep Texas Beautiful Supporter:
VOLUME 1, NO. 3
If Keep,Texas Beautiful and the State Department of Highways and
Public Transportation have their way, 1986 will be the year that
littering ceases to be a risk-free crime in Texas.
PARTY'S OVER, Litter laws are like any laws -- to work they
LITTERBUGS need to be enforced. Our track record's poor:
statistics on cities are hard to come by, but we
know that only ,517 littering citations (just two per county) were
issued statewide by the Department of Public Safety in 1984.
The giant has awakened, however, and to prove it Texas will spend
up to $1 million over the next year on litter enforcement
incentives. The success of this new program depends on our
ability to convince people that littering is a crime -- a costly
crime that's no longer a low priority with the police. The
objectiv~ is deterrence through raised awareness.
Enforcement is one of the four major building blocks in the KEEP
AMERICA BEAUTIFUL System. Until now, however, "litter
enforcement has been on police departments' back burner,"
according to Ed Davis of San Antonio, Keep Texas Beautiful's
Enforcement Task Force chairman.
UPGRADE CITY The Highway Department's new program dovetails
. ORDINANCES... nicely with a new law that gives cities the green
light to put more teeth into their litter
ordinances. Together they form a powerful new one-two punch for
litter prevention in Texas.
A law passed by the 69th Legislature and signed by Governor Mark
White allows cities and towns to adopt ordinances raising'the
maximum fine for a littering conviction to $1,000. The law,
"Vegetation and Litter Violations and Penalties: Municipalities,"
doubles the previously ,permissible maximum fine.
A few cities have already acted to increase the penalties. Local
pressure on elected officials can help to further the trend.
...THEN WRITE The next step is enforcement. "There will always
MORE TICKETS be a few individuals who refuse to change their
behavior," according to the KAB System training
manual. "In these instances, consistent and effective
enforcement...will serve to change behavior and reinforce, for
the rest of the conununity, its own commitment to cleanliness."
A PUBLICATION FOR KEY VOLUNTEERS AND PROGRAM PARTICiPANTS
r-:
. .. .'. .
, .,
~e
I
~J
~..
~
~
f
-~ :
~
i
I
f
Ie
~. i
t .~
I-",,¡
-:'1
]
¡ . .!
f ~
I
LITTER: A It's true: the toughest ordinance in the world
NEW PRIORITY isn't worth the paper it's printed on if it's not
enforced. The State Highway Commission knew this
when it structured its first-ever $4 million litter prevention
program last spring. It earmarked 25 percent of the total for
enforcement incentives.
Nothing of this scale had ever been attempted in Texas -- indeed
a~ywhere. It posed quite a challenge to the three people in the'
H1ghway Department's Safety and Maintenance Operations Division
charged with devising the plan: Chief Engineer Mîlton M.
Dietert, ~upervising Landscape Architect Craig Steffens, and
Program D1rector Melody Hughes.
As they explored ways to encourage enforcement, they kept hearing
one continuing refrain: Above all, keep it simple. Police
CRIME AND A person cited for littering in Texas faces one of
PUNISHMENTS many possible punishments, depending on the
jurisdiction in which the crime was committed.
Here's a rundown on some of the major ones:
: i
.
Within a municipality: A local police force citation can yield a
fine of up to $1,000, if the city has upgraded its ordinance to
reflect the new ceiling. The city can be reimbursed for $20 per
citation'under the new incentives program only if the citation
was issued on a State Highway right of way.
Along a public highway: The Litter Abatement Act, as amended
last year by the 69th Legislature, sets fines of $50-$400 for
littering within 300 yards of a public highway. That includes
"any road, street, way, thoroughfare, beach or park open for
vehicular traffic" -- and thus all 124 Texas State Parks, all
county parks, and most beaches along the Gulf Coast.
,
,¡
;.j
'. î
On Federal Land (including National Parks, Monuments and
Seashores): . The Code of Federal Regulations outlaws litter, but
fines are set by the respective u.s. District Courts. Texas
courts have uniformly imposed a maximum fine of $50 for
littering. Rangers in Big Bend National Park emphasize cleanup
over· citations and fines, while their counterparts at Padre
Island National Seashore complain that the vast bulk of their
beach litter is washed ashore from the Gulf of Mexico.
~i
I'~
, 1
I
¡
,
r
At Sea: The u.s. Coast Guard will refer cases of littering from
oceangoing vessels to the u.s. Attorney's office for prosecution
under the Refuse Act of 1899. Criminal penalties including fines
of $500-$2,500 and jail terms of 30 days to 1 year can be imposed
for convictions. Illegal dumping from offshore oil rigs is
punishable by civil fines of up to $5,000.
Elsewhere: Littering on any private or public land not covered
by the provisions above is punishable by a fine of $40-$200 under
the Litter Abatement Act.
;
)
!
!
" I
-:
i
-........-- --_. - - . -.."
~.....- ~............--.--
"
II
It
II
t-
III
II
II
II
II
.,
II
II
II
II
II
.
II
JA
Lr Mct1
forces today are wary and weary of government "incentives
programs," as the term conjures up visions of monsters like the
Federal/State Selective Traffic Enforcement Act.
That program was designed to fund police crackdowns on certain
traffic violations such as drunk driving and Interstate Highway
speeding, but has become such a nightmare of red tape that most
local forces forgo the money in favor of administrative sanity.
The Texas program needed to be short on paperwork and accessible
by communities of all sizes. The wrong program could allow an
aggressive large city to swallow up a disproportionate chunk of
the incentives budget before other, smaller communities were able
to get a contract signed.
A PROGRAM On January 7, the program became reality as the
IS BORN Highway Department's 25 District Offices were
provided guideline packets and contracts for
distribution throughout the state. The District Offices
immediately began contacting cities, and the word was out.
Steffens' office received more than 30 calls.
"It wi.II work," Steffens told the Keep Texas Beautiful Board of
Directors at its Jan. 16 meeting in Austin. "It's not perfect.
We'd like to be able to include counties in the program, for .
example. But we think it's a straightforward way to move
littering up the priority ladder at the local police level."
MINIMAL Simple it is: Municipalities can sign a contract
PAPERWORK with the State that will allow them to be
reimbursed $20 for each litter citation issued.
The city council must pass a resolution approving enrollment in
the program.
Cities collect their litter citations, send copies of them to the
Highway Department District Office every quarter, and receive
their reimbursement checks. They can be reimbursed up to their
ceiling amount or until the $1 million fund is exhausted.
---
~. .. ~ - ..... . --
. .._.... .. . .. ...._... 0.._ . ...._ ~. __..~ ... .............. ._ .. ._.... _ .-.~_-.-.
I
I
,
I
\
i
\
Remember. . .
1. Cities have to enroll. The council must approve a
resolution, and the city must contract with the state.
2. It's not a bounty system. The city receives the
reimbursement, not the individual police officer. Cities
can earmark their reimbursements for specific projects,
however, incluâing those that benefit police.
3. Citations, not convictions, drive the program. Cities are
reimbursed for the citations they issue, regardless of their
eventual disposition.
4.
PUblicity is the key to success. Local coordinators and
interested citizens can work with the police departments to
increase the community's awareness of the program.
-.-... .... '-.~.._.-. -- .......
, --
~' J
"'
, . i
~¡
/.
-¡
I'~
, ~
.j
~~
",j
.;:~
,·1
"'j
;A
1'1
"1
~ t
I .
,,~1
: "1
~~
.J
"j
(t..]
11
of. , ~
t :
í~
, I
..,~
~ 'Î
.t_,.,"';":.:.
. ~
~,
; ¡
j
.~
¡,.¡
, , .
- . ... . ... .. .... .. -... ~ -...-
.. ~ ..
.... '"' ... ~
Reimbursement ceilings are imposed depending on the size of the
community, as follows:
Population
Total Contract Amt.
* Tickets
10 0, 00 a-plus
75,000-99,999
50,000-74,999
25,000-49,999
10,000-24,999
below 9,999
$ 50,000
37,500
25,000
12,500
5,000
2,500
2,500
1,875
1,250
625
250
125
Most municipalities in Texas have been informed of the new
program. Some may have already approved resolutions authorizing
enrollment. To find out about your community, ask the city
manager's office whether the subject has been scheduled for
consideration by the council.
CITIES CAN If it hasn't, urge the city manager to propose it.
ENROLL NOW Explain the painlessness and simplicity of the
program as well as the intended results. If the
city is unaware of the program, contact Keep Texas Beautiful or
the Highway Dept. District Office for information and a contract.
Once your community is in the program, law enforcement
supervisors (mayor, city manager, police chief, police sergeant)
are the people who will make it a priority for officers. Work
with them to achieve that result.
We're hoping for participation from 100 percent of the
communities in Texas by the end of the first year. If cities
take full advantage of the $1 million program, 5,000 littering
citations will be issued this year. That should get results.
For a cleaner, more beautiful Texas,
Sincerely,
^~~
{k.
NONPROFIT 0
U.S. Pi
PA
AUStin,
Permit t
Keep Texas Beautiful, Inc.
PO BOX 2251 . AUSTIN. TEXAS 78768, 512/478·8813
ADDRESS CORRECTION REQUESTED
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST
LOOP 820 - FEBRUARY 24, 1986 - 7:30 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Echols called the meeting to order February 24, 1986, at 7:30 p.m.
Present:
Dan Echols
Richard Davis
Dick Fisher
Marie Hinkle
Virginia Moody
Harold Newman
Jim Ramsey
Staff:
Dennis Horvath
Jeanette Rewis
Lee Maness
Mike McEntire
Gene Riddle
John Whitney
Richard Royston
Richard Albin
Don Bowen
Absent:
Jim Ken.na
Rodger-N. Line
Rex McEntire
Press:
David Ray
Mark England
Chris Williams
2.
ROLL CALL
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman
eouncilwoman
Councilwoman
Councilman
Councilman
Assistant City Manager
City Secretary
Finance Director
Attorney
Public Works Director
Purchasing Agent
Director of Planning
City Engineer
Planning & Zoning Member
Councilman
City Manager
Attorney
Northeast Chronicle
Mid Cities
Fort Worth Star Telegram
3.
INVOCATION
Mayor Pro Tern Davis gave the invocation.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
M
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
II
February 10, 1986
Page 2
Councilman Ramsey called for point of special privilege.
Mayor Echols presented Councilwoman Hinkle with a resolution recognizing her
service and achievements.
4.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 10, 1986
APPROVED
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve the
minutes of February 10, 1986.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that on Page 5, Item No.8, a motion was made and
no action was taken on the motion. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if the
intention was to withdraw the motion.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to withdraw the
motion.
Motion to withdraw carried 6-0.
Motion to approve the minutes carried 6-0.
5.
REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
Councilman Ramsey removed Item No. 21 and Councilwoman Moody removed Item No.
11 from the Consent Agenda.
6.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK
(12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23 24, & 25)
APPROVED
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve the
Consent Agenda.
Motion carried 6-0.
7.
PZ 85-148 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _
APPEAL HEARING - REQUEST OF
DOUBLE B DEVELOPMENT COMPANY TO REZONE
LOT 3R, BLOeK F, RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION,
FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY TO LR (LOCAL RETAIL)
(LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF STRUMMER DRIVE
IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY)
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak
in favor of this request to please come forward.
Mr. Ronnie Butler, 3416 Chapman, representing Double B Development Company,
appeared before the Council.
I'
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
February 24, 1986
Page 3
Mr. Butler stated he did not feel this property was suited for homes. Mr.
Butler stated that all of the homes in the area backed up to the property.
Mr. Butler stated they planned to build an office on the property.
Councilwoman Moody asked if any of the houses on Strummer faced the property.
Mr. Butler replied no.
Mr. Alfred Stanford, 5101 Pearl Drive, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Stanford stated he was in favor of this request because the property was
not suited for residential. Mr. Stanford stated that most of the property in
the area was commercial.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request
to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing.
8.
ORDINANCE NO. 1341
APPROVED
Councilman Ramsey moved to deny Ordinance No. 1341.
Motion to deny died for lack of a second.
Councilman Newman moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve
Ordinance No. 1341.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked Mr. Butler if he would agree to the stipulation of
0-1 zoning because he did not want to see a convenience store put there.
Mr. Butler stated he would agree to 0-1 zoning.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to amend the motion
to state for one-story office bUilding.
Councilman Ramsey stated that he felt that if the applicant had applied for
office zoning at the time the request went to Planning & Zoning, the Planning
& Zoning Commission would have sent the Council a recommendation for approval.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the applicant could not apply for office zoning
because the tract had to be at least one acre.
Motion carried 5-1; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody, and
Councilmen Fisher and Newman voting for and Councilman Ramsey voting against.
9.
PZ 86-2 REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL HEARING ON PZ 86-2
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to set the appeal
hearing for March 24, 1986.
Motion carried 6-0.
I'
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 24, 1986
Page 4
10.
PZ 85-69 POSSIBLE RECONSIDERATION OF PZ 85-69
APPROVED
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to set a Public
Hearing for the reconsideration of PZ 85-69 for March 24, 1986.
Councilman Fisher stated that after action was taken on this item he looked
at the land use map and felt the property should be commercial; therefore, he
felt the Council should hear it again.
Councilman Ramsey stated he felt that there were two issues that needed to be
cleared up. Councilman Ramsey stated one was the right of a council person
to resurrect an issue they wanted to be reconsidered. Councilman Ramsey
stated he felt it was admirable that someone wanted to do this when they knew
what they would have to face.
Motion carried 6-0.
11.
PS 85-80 REQUEST BY RICHMOND BAY DEVELOPMENT INC.
FOR REPLAT OF BLOCK 9, MEADOW LAKES ADDITION
(LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
MEADOW LAKES DRIVE WEST OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE)
APPROVED
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve PS 85-
80 subject to the engineers comments and a stipulation that 2,000 square foot
houses, 10,000 square foot lots and rear entry garages be placed on the plat.
Motion carried 6-0.
*12.
PS 86-1 REQUEST OF JIM WARREN AND CAREY BECK
FOR REPLAT OF LOT 3R, CALLOWAY ACRES ADDITION
(LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
PARCHMAN STREET NORTH OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY)
APPROVED
*13.
PS 86-3 REQUEST OF HANSON PROPERTIES
FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 7R, 8R, AND 9R, BLOCK 3, NOB HILL ADDITION
(LOCATED ON LOMBARD STREET)
APPROVED
14.
SO 86-2 REQUEST OF MAY ADVERTISING
TO LOCATE A BILLBOARD SIGN ON
NORTHEAST LOOP 820 WEST OF EDISON DRIVE
APPROVED
Mayor Echols advised that at the present time there were four nonconforming
billboards on the property. Mayor Echols stated that in addition there was a
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 24, 1986
Page 5
mono-pole billboard at the intersection of Grapevine Highway and IH 820.
Mayor Echols stated that the proposed billboard would meet the criteria of
the Sign Ordinance if the existing nonconforming signs were removed from the
site.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve SO 86-2
on the condition that before the permit was issued all nonconforming signs be
torn down.
Motion carried 6-0.
13.
SO 86-3 REQUEST OF ALAN YOUNG BUICK
FOR VARIANCE TO SECTION 4.1(B) .F THE
SIGN ORDINANCE
- TABLED -
Mayor Echols advised that the requested sign would exceed the ordinance
controls in three areas.
Mr. Alan Young, President of Alan Young Buic~ and Danny Mayer appeared
before the Council.
Mr. Mayer stated this request was to replace the sign that was placed there
originally by General Motors Corporation. Mr. Mayer stated this sign would
advertise their outside used car lot. Mr. Mayer stated the sign placed there
by General Motors was not visible from the freeway.
After discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey,
to table this request.
Motion carried 6-0.
16.
SO 86-4 REQUEST OF RICHLAND HILLS CHURCH OF CHRIST
FOR VARIANCE TO SIGN ORDINANCE SECTION 4.1(B) AND 4.2(B)
APPROVED
Mayor Echols advised this request was for two ground signs and the Staff had
asked the Council to make a determination whether the church site should be
considered two separate developments and whether a variance should be granted
to allow an oversize sign for the main sanctuary bUilding.
Mr. Michael Barnard, Architect for Richland Hills Church of Christ, appeared
before the Council.
Mr. Barnard stated that it was his understanding that the Sign Ordinance's
definition of one development did not apply to this property. Mr. Barnard
stated that the property was divided by Meadow Lakes Drive leaving two
separate lots and bUildings. Mr. Barnard stated they were therefore
requesting two separate ground signs. Mr. Barnard stated that the
information the Council had received indicated they were requesting a 400
square foot sign for the main facility. Mr. Barnard stated that in
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 24, 1986
Page 6
discussion with Mr. Wheeler and Mr. Royston, the area was the attraction area
and he calculated it at 286 square feet. Mr. Barnard stated that in addition
they were requesting some small directional signs and and lettering on glass
door fronts.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked how he arrived at 286 square feet.
Mr. Barnard stated that according to the Sign Ordinance, the definition was
the attraction area and it had been interpreted by City Staff as the
lettering area of the sign.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve SO 86-4
subject to the directional signs being under six square feet, and the large
sign be reduced to 300 square feet.
Motion carried 6-0.
*17.
GN 86-15 REQUEST OF FLOORTIME INC.,
FOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS RELEASE OF
UTILITY EASEMENT ON EAST PROPERTY LINE
OF LOT AR-1, CALLOWAY ADDITION,
RESOLUTION NO. 86-10
APPROVED
*18.
PU 86-6 BID AWARD TO INDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL
FOR ONE TYMCO SWEEP IN THE AMOUNT OF $68,510.00
APPROVED
*19.
PU 86-7 APPROVAL OF CONDEMNATION OF
MR. AND MRS. PAUL D. LEARNED FOR HIGHTOWER ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY,
RESOLUTION NO. 86-11
APPROVED
(CONDEMNATION SETTLED)
*20.
PU 86-8 EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS
FOR DRAINAGE EASEMENT
APPROVED
21.
PU 86-9 REQUEST TO DENY BID
FOR LIGHTING AT RICHFIELD PARK
APPROVED
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to approve PU 86-9.
Mr. Horvath stated that late last summer the staff was advised of a serious
problem with the electricity at Richfield Park. Mr. Horvath stated that the
electrical wiring that was installed several years ago did not meet the
code. Mr. Horvath stated that last September an estimated cost of $25,000
was given to the City to correct the problem. Mr. Horvath stated that the
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
February 24, 1986
Page 7
Park Board, through the City Manager's office, authorized the engineers to
take a detailed look at the problem and come back with specifications and
construction plans to correct the problem. Mr. Horvath stated that between
September and January the cost increased to $100,000 and the City Council
approved the funds in January to alleviate the problem. Mr. Horvath stated
that bids were taken, only one bid was received and that bid was $178,000.
Mr. Horvath stated the staff felt the bid of $178,000 should be rejected, the
project be rebid, and the bidders be given more time to complete the
project. Mr. Horvath stated that RYA had been very helpful and understanding
of the City's dilemma. Mr. Horvath stated he had talked with Texas Electric
and there was no possible way any patchwork could be done.
Ms. Linda Turk, 6266 Gayle, representing RYA, appeared before the Council.
Ms. Turk stated that they were aware that the bids came in too high and RYA
took it upon themselves to talk to the contractor that did Northfield Park.
Ms. Turk stated this particular contractor was not aware bids were taken and
said they would work within the city's budget to have the lights on by
April. Ms. Turk stated that on February 19th she signed a contract with the
City for use of the ballpark during daylight hours only. Ms. Turk stated
that the park was closed and the parking lot was torn up. Ms. Turk stated
they would like to have two nights at another park.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he did not think that the city had another
baseball park.
Mr. Horvath stated no, that the city did not have another softball park.
Mayor Echols stated he was under the impression that RYA had talked to other
cities that had light facilities.
Ms. Turk stated she had talked to the City of Watauga but their parks did not
have lighting facilities.
Mr. Horvath asked Ms. Turk if she had talked to the City of Colleyville; that
they had been very helpful with this type of situation in the past.
Ms. Turk replied she had not talked with Colleyville.
Councilwoman Moody asked Ms. Turk if she had talked to the schools and the
YMCA.
Ms. Turk replied they were going to talk to the high school about the older
children playing there, but that would not solve their problem for the
younger children.
Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated he wished the City could do something better, but
based on what the staff had advised he did not think she would want her
children playing at Richfield Park in its present condition.
Councilman Ramsey stated he was in agreement with the field being unsafe and
felt it was unfortunate that it had continued on for this long. Councilman
Ramsey stated he did not know what else could be done at this point except
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
February 24, 1986
Page 8
make sure it did not happen again in the future. Councilman Ramsey stated
that he was not aware that contracts were being signed by the City and would
like to see something established more permanent in the future. Councilman
Ramsey stated that he felt that RYA was doing a tremendous service to the
city. Councilman Ramsey stated that he recommended that the Mayor appoint a
committee consisting of a Council Person, Park and Recreation Board Member
and a representative from the City Staff to resolve the issue.
Mr. Tom Turner, 3008 Highland Crest Court, Hurst, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Turner stated that one of the problems with the fields was that RYA
worked with five different age groups. Mr. Turner stated that the youngest
age group which started at 8 years of age played on smaller fields without
pitching mounds. Mr. Turner stated the older groups, the Pony and Colt
Leagues, were more like major league baseball and the high school fields
could be used. Mr. Turner stated the pitchers mounds could not be torn down
each time for the younger leagues. Mr. Turner stated that Richfield Park had
four separate fields that were maintained by RYA and met their needs. Mr.
Turner stated that RYA had made it a tradition not to play on Wednesday or
Sunday because of church. Mr. Turner stated that the Pony League Baseball
Regulations stated there should be a 12 game minimum schedule per year. Mr.
Turner stated they had prepared a proposed schedule on being able to play one
league each evening, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday, and all leagues
playing on Saturday. Mr. Turner stated therefore they would only be able to
play nine leagues and that was only if there were no rainouts. Mr. Turner
stated that these were the problems RYA was facing. Mr. Turner stated he
understood the city's problems in not being able to take any bids but if
someone else could do it within the budget he wished he could have been here.
Ms. Gay Turner, 3008 Highland Crest Court, Hurst, appeared before the Council.
Ms. Turner stated she had talked to the owners of Clark Electric and asked
them why they did not bid on the project. Ms. Turner stated that Ms. Clark
advised her they were unaware bids were taken. Ms. Turner stated she asked
Ms. Clark if she would be interested in bidding and she replied yes. Ms.
Turner stated that she advised Ms. Clark that they would have to work within
the city's budget and she said if her sons could play in RYA Baseball they
would do everything they could to work within the city's budget.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that if the bids came in high again, the Council
needed to have a consensus on another plan.
Ms. Turner asked the Council to reopen the bids as soon as possible.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis advised that RYA would not be able to use the park while
the work was being done because it would be too dangerous.
Motion to approve PU 86-9 carried 6-0.
Mayor Echols appointed the following to serve on the committee: Councilman
Ramsey; David McGilvary, Chairman, Park and Recreation Board; Dennis Horvath,
Assistant City Manager; and Linda Turk, RYA.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 24, 1986
Page 9
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the
appointments.
Motion carried 6-0.
*22.
PW 86-5 APPROVAL OF STREET RECONSTRUCTION
BY TARRANT COUNTY PRECINCT 3
APPROVED
*23.
PW 86-6 PROPOSED SEWER RATE INCREASE
AND NEW PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR SEWER
TRANSPORTATION AND TREATMENT WITH
THE CITY OF FORT WORTH
APPROVED
*24.
PW 86-7 APPRAISAL OF PARCELS OF LAND
FOR THE WATAUGA ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
APPROVED
*25.
PAY 86-13 PAY ESTIMATE #1 AND FINAL
FOR STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN SMITHFIELD ACRES
APPROVED
26.
CITIZEN PRESENTATION
Mr. Tom Hedge, 5809 Crestwood, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Hedge stated he owned a business on Davis Boulevard and he had been
burglarized and robbed twice in the last two years. Mr. Hedge stated he was
tired of being robbed and nothing being done. Mr. Hedge stated he knew the
Police Department and they were very good policemen. Mr. Hedge stated the
city was growing and there was not enough policemen to go round to work the
cases. Mr. Hedge stated he would like to see the Council increase the Police
Department personnel and look into having reserves.
Councilman Fisher stated he did not know if the city had checked into
reserves but that he knew of other cities that did have police reserves and
were very successful. Councilman Fisher stated he felt it was time the city
did look into the possibility of a reserve force.
Mr. Hedge stated he was not qualified to be a reserve officer but he was
Willing to go to school and learn.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that he agreed 100 percent, but this was the first
time anyone had brought the ide an of reserve officers to Council's
attention. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he felt the Assistant City Manager
could look into it and determine if it would work. Mayor Pro Tem Davis
stated he would like to invite Mr. Hedge to come back before the Council in
July at budget time.
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
February 24, 1986
Page 10
Mr. Hedge stated that he would.
Councilwoman Moody stated she would like to thank Mr. Hedge and also felt the
city had a fine Police Department.
Councilman Ramsey stated he also wanted to thank Mr. Hedge and would
encourage him to come back in July and remind the Council.
Mr. Warren Condra, 7458 Meadow Court, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Condra stated he had also been robbed. Mr. Condra stated when he resided
in the City of Bedford he was robbed three times. Mr. Condra stated he
thought the city had a very good Police Department.
27.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to adjourn.
Motion carried 6-0.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l. : ¡
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
Department:
3/24/86
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: PZ 85-56
Subject:
Approval of Future Land Use Plan
and Master Plan Text, Final Components of
Comprehensive Master Plan
Ordinance No. 1350
Over the last two years the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have
been in the process of considering and reviewing the various components of the
Comprehensive Master Plan of the City of North Richland Hills. Several times during
that process public hearings have been held which gathered citizen input into the
aspects of the planning of the City.
Recently the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council met in a joint work
session to review and comment on the final two aspects of the Master Plan, the Future
Land Use Map and the Plan Policy Statement. With the comments and corrections directed
by that joint meeting these two documents are ready to be included in the compilation of
the overall Master Plan document.
With the approval of these last two components as corrected the compilation of the
Master Plan can be accomplished. The components which will be included in the
Comprehensive Plan are:
1. Master Plan Analysis and Policy Statement
2. Future Land Use Plan
3. Thoroughfare Plan
4. Master Drainage Plan
5. Master Water System Plan
6. Master Sewer System Plan
7. Park Master Plan
The Planning and Zoning Commission has previously approved and recommended that the City
Council adopt the complete Master Plan of the City.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Comprehensive Master Plan of the City
as amended in accordance with the City Council's directives and direct the publication
of the full document.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
o er
Finance Review
Accl. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
If øt¿J
City Manager
, Finance Director
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
PaQe 1 of 1
" .
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 9
p & Z Minutes
August 8, 1985
(
(
PZ 85-40
APPROVED
Mr. Tucker on to redesign
the Thoro showing Starnes
o be C-2-U west of Davis
Boulevard and M-4-U east of Davis
Boulevard. This motion was seconded
by Mr. Wood and the motion carried
5-0.
13. PZ 85-56
Consideration of Comprehensive Master
Plan.
PZ 85-56
APPROVED
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve
the Comprehensive Master Plan and to ..'
send it to the City Council for review
and approval. This motion was
seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion
carried 5-0.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:20 P. M.
Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission
Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
.... ,.. ~. ~ ...
City of j\(órth RichIand Hills~ Texas
!~
~if\ A
~\;S~~
;~-
. I ""':,
d/
f
MEMORANDUM
August 26, 1985
TO:
Rodger N. Line, City Manager
FROM:
Richard Royston
Director of Planning and Development
SUBJECT:
Proposed Comprehensive Master Plan
At their meeting of August 12, 1985 the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the
proposed Future Land Use Map to be placed in the Comprehensive Master Plan for the City
of North Richland Hills. The map which was under consideration had been revised to
incorporate all of the changes which had occurred as a result of zoning actions taken
since the map had been previously drafted. In addition the Base Map on which the land
use was placed was modified to conform to the same base utilized by the Thoroughfare
Plan. The Future Land Use Map is the last element of the Master Plan to be brought up
to date. With the compilation of the following items;
(1) Future Land Use Plan
(2) Thoroughfare Plan
(3) Master Drainage Plan
(4) Master Water System Plan
(5) Master Sewer System Plan
(6) Park Master Plan
(7) Analysis and Policy statement Text,
the overall Comprehensive Plan for the City of North Richland Hills is complete and
ready for adoption by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to the City Council
that they review and comment on the complete Comprehensive Master Plan.
18171 281·0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
L
ì .
(
(
7.
Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded
approve the Consent Agenda.
September 23, 1985
Page 2
~otion carried 4-0.
8.
Mr. Line recommended that this item be postponed until the
Staff could provide additional information.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle,
to postpone PZ 85-56.
Motion carried 4-0.
9.
Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody,
to approve the request for an Appeal Hearing to be heard
October 28, 1985.
Motion carried 4-0.
10.
Councilman Kenna moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to
authorize condemnation proceedings and the cost to be borne
by Hamm and Associates.
NT AGENDA ITEM
(S) INDICATED BY
ASTERISK (11, 15, 16
17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 26, 27,
28)
APPROVED
PZ 85-56 PROPOSED
COMPREHENSIVE MASTER
PLAN
POSTPONED
PZ 85-100 REQUES
R.G.A. DEVELOP
CORP. FOR AN
HEARING
PS -35 REQUEST OF
i\N W. HAMM, INC.
OR FINAL PLAT OF
BRIARWOOD ESTATES,
SECTION 6 (LOCATED
SOUTH OF STARNES ROAD
AND EAST OF DOUGLAS
LANE)
Motion carried 4-0.
*11.
'12.
Councilman Kenna móved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to
postpone PS 8~.
Motion car .~ 4-0.
PS 85-55 REQUEST OF
JOHN BARFIELD, HERMAN
SMITH, AND THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS FOR REPLAT OF
TRACTS AR AND B,
BLOCK 2, CRESTWOOD
ESTATES (LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF DAVIS BLVD. AND
STARNES ROAD)
APPROVED
PS 85-58 REQUEST OF
JOHNSTON AND SON
CONSTRUCTION INC. FOR
REPLAT OF BLOCK 6,
MEADOW LAKES ADDITION
(LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF MEADOW LAKES
DRIVE AT THE
INTERSECTION OF RUFE
SNOW DRIVE)
POSTPONED
I 'I' ~
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
PROPOSED .
COr'¡PREHENS lVE
PLAN
.r ' ¡
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN
SECTION I - ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
The analysis section of the Comprehensive Plan is a distillation of the
information gathered by the Planning and Zoning Commission of North Richland
Hills, Texas. The statistical information contained in this section
represents a combination of analysis of received statistics and subjective
judgements made by the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the City of
North Richland Hills.
POPULATION
Purpose:
The reason behind population analysis is that population
statistics are a measure of the condition of a community.
Population statistics are not an end to themselves, but are
community indicators. Information as to the total expected
population gives an approximation of what the overall demand
for City services might be.
Population statistics are often treated as if changes in
population numbers occur in a vacuum. Population changes are
interwoven with physical, political, economic, social and other
forces. The more these forces are changed in dramatic or rapid
form, the more dramatic and rapid are the changes in popula-
tion.
I ~ . , 'r,
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
History:
Holding
Capacity:
Historical population statistics for North Richland Hills
begin in 1960. The following is a tabulation of the Bureau of
the Census counts and a current estimate.
1960
1970
1980
1985
8,662
16,514
30,592
39,710 *
*North Central Texas Council of Governments Estimate
Since its incorporation, North Richland Hills has almost
doubled in population every ten years. The City has also
increased considerably in physical size through annexation.
However, most of the land annexed was very sparsely developed,
and the majority of the population growth has resulted from
increases in residential development.
Holding capacity is a term that refers to the number of persons
that can live within a given geographical area given a certain
population density or, when North Richland Hills is fully
developed, how many people will live in the City. This is an
important issue because of the fiscal factors. The cost of
municipal services and sales tax as well as ad valorem tax
income can be estimated, if the number of people, types and
numbers of dwelling units, and business types are properly
projected .
Presently, North Richland Hills houses about ten persons per
acre within fully developed residential areas. North Richland
2
I .. "
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
Hills will have an ultimate population of approximately 90,000
persons when the City is fully developed. This is based on the
presumption that about 85% of the land area will be used for
residential purposes, that no further annexation takes place
and that the density will remain the same, i.e. no major shifts
will be made in the Zoning pattern or within the zoning
categories.
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
Retail:
Industrial:
The recent population growth and retail/commercial construction
has propelled the City from a minor role to a major role in the
economy of Northeast Tarrant County.
The retail sector has experienced considerable growth and
health in the past five years. This is primarily due to the
opening of North Hills Mall and retail centers along the Rufe
Snow corridor.
With a continuing strong growth trend, ample room to grow and
new retail/commercial facilities the retail/commercial sector
should continue to grow.
While the retail/commercial sector has experienced extensive
growth, the industrial sector has lagged mainly due to a lack
of a coordinated effort by the City and others to attract
industrial users. The Industrial Development Board has been
activated and is working diligently to attract clean industries
3
I .f r
~
I
I
I
I
I Conclusion:
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
to the City. An advertising brochure with easily updatable
information is being prepared for national and international
distributions.
Another factor is the lack of adequate thoroughfares to support
truck traffic in the Industrial areas. The adoption and
implementation of the Thoroughfare Plan included in this report
will help answer those needs.
The general economy is strong at this time in North Richland
Hills. Recent developments have placed the City among the
major regional retail/commercial market competitors. While the
short term outlook is positive, the volatile nature of a retail
oriented economy is such that rapid change can be negative as
well as positive.
Several problem factors are:
o
Aging of the older retail facilities in the southern
portion of the City and of the population around them
o
Development of new superior regional retail facili-
ties in the surrounding cities which could capture a
considerable amount of sales dollars
o
Long lag time delay between development of new
residential areas and subsequent development of
retail facilities
4
I '.' .' .....
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
The City should develop strategies to strengthen and diversify
the retail sector in order to prolong the positive cycles of
the retail sector.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
Drainage:
It is useful to determine the natural and màn-made physical
aspects of an area. An analysis of these features indicate
their encouragement or discouragement of the use of lands by
man.
Environmental considerations are of significant importance.
This is based primarily on practical considerations.
The six drainage basin areas are:
0 Big Fossil Creek
0 Calloway Branch
0 Walker Branch
0 Little Bear Creek
0 Mesquite Branch
0 Mackey Branch
and tributaries. These drainage areas are shown on the maps
in the Master Drainage Plan.
5
I" . .~
~
I
I
I
I
I Man-Made
I Features:
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
Approximately one-half of the land in North Richland Hills is
drained by Big Fossil Creek, Little Bear Creek, and their
tributaries. The other one-half is drained by Walker Branch,
Calloway Branch, Mesquite Branch, Mackey Branch and their
tributaries. Big Fossil Creek and Little Bear Creek originate
outside of the corporate limits. The remaining branches
originate within the corporate limits of the City.
In the Drainage Master Plan of the City these channels are
proposed for full development. The solution of the flood plain
problem will add a significant amount of land area previously
unusable to the development pool.
The significant feature is the large areas of residential and
commercial development. It is fairly apparent from the growth
rate of the community that residential development will be a
dominant feature of the area.
The available supply of treated water is a factor which can
limit future development and possibly restrict the use of
existing development if the City or its suppliers fail to plan
for the future needs.
To address that issue the City has directed the preparation of
Water and Sewer System Master Plans which detail system needs
to support full development.
6
I'" . "f
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Another feature is the transportation infrastructure. Sign if i-
cant ground transportation features are the highways and
arterial routes that are primarily based on long standing
routes that were established when the area was still primarily
agricultural. These features will have a major role in
determining the physical appearance of the City in future
years. (See Thoroughfare Map in Section III)
Another significant transportation infrastructure component
that will play a role in shaping the community is a railroad
track that bisects the community from the southwest to the
northeast. This rail line lies along a key corridor between
Fort Worth and the D/FW Airport. The areas where this track
crosses major auto and truck routes will be likely candidates
for industrial development locations. The access to the
existing Railroad is under-utilized. Most existing light
industrial uses are designed around truck transportation.
The remaining significant transportation infrastructure
component is Mangham Airport. Suffice it to say that while
it is providing a transportation service, the existence of the
airport has an inhibiting effect on residential development
in the immediate area. Currently the property involved in the
airport operations has been sold to a developer whose plans
will not include use as an airport. The Commission and the
City Council will be asked to make specific decisions as to
the mix of uses on the Site and what percentage of the current
Industrial Zoning ,is to be retained.
7
I . I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
LAND USE
General
Discussion:
Analysis of information gathered by the Planning and
Zoning Commission brought out the following points:
o
As discussed earlier in this report substantial areas of the
City remain undeveloped.
Even in the developed areas, there are large tracts and
numerous lots that have not been utilized.
o
A comparison of the land use map with a City zoning map shows
some indications of over-zoning. Over-zoning has been defined
by the American Society of Planning Officials (now merged with
the American Institute of Planners into the American Planning
Association) as "zoning more land area than can reasonably be
expected to be developed for a particular use or zoning for an
excessive population. Thus, over-zoning for industry would
permit industry to locate in scattered areas and preclude land
from being used for other purposes. This is one of the results
of not having or not using a land use plan."
o
The map also shows some evidence of spot zoning, another result
of not following a land use plan. Spot zoning is a relatively
small area zoned differently from the zoning of the surrounding
8
I'" , .
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I Urban Design
Definition:
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
area usually for an incompatible use and to favor the owner of
a particular piece or pieces of property. Spot zoning can be
invalidated by the courts when it violates (a) the intent of
the comprehensive plan (b) the requirements of state enabling
legislation. The 'spotness' is in the arbitrary and
inappropriate nature of the zoning change rather than, as is
commonly believed, in the size of land area. The use of many
flexible techniques such as floating zones or conditional
rezoning have been prohibited by the courts, the argument being
that conferring narrow development permission is a form of spot
zoning. Special small-area zoning districts, however, have
been upheld where the comprehensive plan demonstrates a special
need, such as for a historic area or to preserve a sensitive
natural area.
Urban design is that branch of planning primarily concerned
with the functional and visual relationships between people and
their physical environment and ways in which those relation-
ships can be consciously improved.
Urban design has surfaced as an issue in North Richland Hills.
It is a difficult issue to address because so much of urban
design is subjective. But there have been a number of specific
urban design issues that have been raised by the citizens.
9
I'" '. ¡
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Positive
Aspects:
In general, it has been expressed that there are very
attractive portions of the City, such as some residential
subdivisions; that the many drainage areas offer opportunities
for open space; that much of the City is undeveloped and there
is opportunity to assure that new development reflects the
City's desire for attractive and functional development; the
citizens recognize the desirability of high urban design
standards.
Improvements: There are a number of specific items that have been mentioned
as needing improvement. There will be some overlap between
some of these items such as urban design issues and transpor-
tation, housing and land use. These specific issues also
relate to existing situations and to situations that may exist
in the future.
o Uncoordinated street pattern. In several subdivisions,
the streets do not align with streets in adjacent areas
or deadend without provisions being made to continue
them in future development.
o Too much on-street vehicle storage
o Commercial and Industrial land uses not screened from
adjacent residential uses
10
I" , .
Ie
I
I
I
I
I Housing
I Discussion:
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
o Some property appears to be overzoned
o Too much unscreened outdoor storage
o Some real estate appears to be deteriorating
o Some undeveloped properties have become unofficial dump
grounds
Concerns regarding housing can generally be related to either
the number of units or aspects relating to the physical
attributes of housing.
The housing concerns in North Richland Hills are primarily
related to the physical aspects: conditions (sound, deterior-
ating, etc.); type (single family, duplex, apartment, etc.);
density (how many dwelling units per acre); unit size (how many
square feet per unit); location (where are the units and what
is adjacent to them).
Most of these concerns can be expressed in terms relating to
the quality of the individual units and of the neighborhoods
created by groups of homes. The purpose of this planning
activity is to identify housing situations that can be
improved.
11
I"
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
The following is intended to address those matters that have
been expressed by the citizens and have been noted by the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
o
There are several concerns relating to some of the older (30
years plus) existing housing. There are some isolated pockets
of deteriorating housing units. There is concern that this
deterioration might spread to adjacent property, or that it
would adversely affect adjacent housing.
o
There are concerns regarding conversion of residential areas to
commercial or industrial uses. Those concerns expressed here
are for those areas where spot commercial development can have
a negative effect on adjacent housing.
o
Some of the medium aged housing (20 years ±) is also having
problems with encroachment from commercial and industrial
activities.
o
There is also some apprehension regarding new housing. Most of
these questions are regarding how can the quality of new single
family subdivisions be insured. There seems to be an equation
of size of unit and lot to the quality. This opinion is held
even though housing costs are pushing the price of an average
single family unit beyond affordabi1ity for most families.
Many feel that smaller units on smaller lots will inevitably
create areas of substandard quality.
12
I' · . .
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
Transportation/
Thoroughfare
o
There are also concerns regarding mUltifamily units. Most
agree that there is already too much multifamily development
under way at this time and would like to severely limit any
more multifamily zoning.
Introduction: Transportation is a major issue in North Richland Hills. It is
Automobile:
also a complex issue in that it involves various types of
ground transportation.
A discussion of automobile travel from a government perspective
is a discussion of streets and highways. With auto travel, it
is generally the responsibility of the traveller to provide the
vehicle. It is the responsibility of various levels of govern-
ment to provide the surface on which vehicles may ride.
During the analysis of automobile travel, all input from the
citizens emphasized'concern on how rapid is the pace of
congestion.
The most obvious is the congestion on all major routes through
the City and at the borders. It is the opinion of the citizens
and the Planning and Zoning Commission that all routes with a
state or Federal designation are being utilized at or above
capacity at this time.
13
t .
I'·
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Recommen-
dations:
Public
Transit:
Presently congestion is centered around SH 26 on either side of
Loop 820; FM 1938 as it intersects with SH 26; Glenview Drive
at Loop 820; Glenview Drive at intersection of SH 26; and Rufe
Snow Drive at Loop 820 and the area immediately north of the
intersection in the Commercial area.
Although the North Central Texas Council of Governments
Thoroughfare Plan, had been in unofficial use for some time,
the City has now adopted an official Thoroughfare Plan and will
-begin acquiring right of way for future thoroughfares based
upon that plan. Development will occur in the path of arterial
streets. The Developers of the City will be required to fund
their part of the needed streets. With Developer participation
the portion of the' overall cost of street extensions to be born
by the Citizens will be much less.
The City admittedly has some catching-up to do in constructing
thoroughfare facilities in areas where development has already
occurred.
To date, There has been very little interest shown for a public
transit system. As a practical matter, funding limitations and
the high cost will limit the future of a public transit system,
except as a part of the total approach to mass transit by the
Fort Worth/Tarrant County Transit Authority and Dallas Area
Rapid Transit.
14
t .
I· · . c'
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
Rail:
CITY SERVICES
Public
Works:
North Richland Hills is bisected by a rail line. The line is
important immediately from an industrial development
standpoint, and perhaps, as a future right of way for a mass
transit corridor between Ft. Worth, the D/FW Airport and the
North Dallas Environs. The one rail line is probably
sufficient to provide the City with rail service required for a
reasonable level of industrial development. The probable
location for such rail oriented industrial development occurs
where the rail line is also close to potential truck routes.
Analysis of input from the City Staff and citizens leads the
Planning and Zoning Commission to the conclusion that the
present staff and supporting facilities are totally inadequate
at this time. Several factors are:
°Inadequate office and storage space
°Inadequate number of trained professional inspectors
°Lack of on-board professional city engineers and planners
°Inadequate number of support personnel to adequately
process zoning and platting cases
15
I · . .
~
I
I Fire
I Department:
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
Police
Department:
I
I
f
I
°Scattered maintenance facilities leading to
inefficiencies
As the City grows it is imperative that the City provide
adequate health and fire protection service to the citizens and
business establishments. Therefore in the opinion of the
Planning and Zoning Commission the City should adopt the plan
that has been developed by the City Fire Department. Key
requirements are:
°Fire Station to serve Northeast sector of the City
°Fire Station to serve Northwest sector of the City
°Fire Training Complex
°Animal Control Complex
°Ambrilance Services
There is a need at this time and in the future to increase
personnel and to provide additional supporting facilities. Key
requirements are:
°Additional office and storage areas
16
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
Library:
City Cable
Television:
Parks and
Recreation:
°Additional parking for police vehicles
°Increase in the number of trained police officers will
be required as the population of the City grows
°Lack of proper traffic engineering
The plan submitted by the Library Staff appears to be well
thought out and the Planning and Zoning Commission supports the
removal of the Library function from City Hall to a stand alone
Library facility centrally located.
The Planning and Zoning Commission received little input from
the citizens concerning City Cable Television, but there has
been good response to the programming and information provided
by the municipal channel, Citicable 36, during the last two
years.
The Parks and Recreation Board presented the currently adopted
Park Plan. Recommendations of that report include:
°
Retention of existing parks:
Richfield
Northfield
Fossil Creek
Norich
17
I:
~
1
o
Enlargement of Richfield Park if additional land can
be obtained
1
o
Construction of a central community recreational
1
center
1
Subsequent to adoption of the report the City conducted a
1
survey of citizens interest and found special interest in
additional items not in the parks:
1
o
A municipal swimming pool
I
~
o
Additional non-structured recreational facilities
I
Citizens input received by Planning and Zoning indicates strong
interest in a municipal pool and non-structured recreational
1
facilities such as bike and hiking paths, picnic facilities,
park benches and swings.
1
I
The existing Park Plan for the City indicates a need for
approximately 45 additional acres of park land.
I
1
I
f
I
18
I'
Ie
I
I
COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN
SECTION 11 PLAN POLICIES
I
INTRODUCTION
I
I
The Plan Policies Section of this document sets out goals and
policies regarding the existing and future needs and
aspirations of the City of North Richland Hills as identified
by the City Council, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and
the citizens of the City.
I
I
Ie
I
The City of North Richland Hills is currently experiencing
significant strength in both its economy and overall growth
pattern. It is the intent of the City Council and the Planning
and Zoning Commission that every effort be made to encourage,
sustain and improve upon these strengths. At the same time the
growth pattern which is a product of this activity must be
coordinated and directed.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
The following areas are identified as those in which the
efforts of the City should be directed in achieving the overall
goals stated above.
19
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lit
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
1.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The overall health of a City is normally measured by its
economic activity. This activity takes place on two levels
which are of direct benefit to the citizens of the City.
The first of these is the level of commercial and/or industrial
activity. On this level a positive growth factor will provide
necessary services for the citizens and an employment base for
the City's economy. A secondary benefit of this activity is the
increase in sales tax revenue which follows increased business
growth.
The second area is the development and growth activity level in
the residential sector of the City. Again, a positive growth
factor creates economic health by adding value to the City tax
base and adding additional population to the City.
As stated earlier, the City of North Richland Hills is
experiencing a positive growth factor in both these areas at
the present time. The Planning and Zoning Commission and the
City Council recognize the value of these growth factors. A
continuing positive growth pattern is both desirable and
essential. However, the intent of the City Council and the
Planning and Zoning Commission is that in encouraging the
continuation of these growth patterns every effort will be made
to maintain a balance between the various economic components.
20
I" ~
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
2. LAND USE
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Currently the development pattern of the City of North Richland
Hills has considerable activity and economic strength in retail
development both in current tax income and in ongoing
development activity. It is assumed that the retail businesses
created by this massive expansion will continue to be an active
and viable part of the community in the forseeable future. It
is the intent of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the
City Council to support the Commercial activity of the City
recognizing the significant role it is playing in the economic
health of the community.
The City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission also
recognize the responsibility they have to provide an economic
balance of activity in the community. To that end the City
will encourage the full utilization of the industrial zoned
property within the City. The establishment of a sound
industrial segment of the City's economy can be used to offset
the rapid changes which can occur in the commercial/retail
portion of the City's economy.
According to current statistics approximately one-half of the
land area of the City of North Richland Hills is still
undeveloped. The direction in which the future land use of
that undeveloped area is pointed will be a major determinant of
the overall character and texture of the City for many years to
come.
21
I' .. ~
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
The Future Land Use Plan contained in this report is a
compilation of the expectations of the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council as to the direction of growth
in the City for the next several decades. It is the intent
of the Commission and Council that the Land Use Plan be the
basis for decision making in the guidance of that future
development.
The proposed Land Use Plan makes several basic assumptions
about the City as it exists today in projecting the future
development.
(1) Existing uses in place will remain stable and viable for the
most part into the future.
(2) The Economic Development goals as stated in this report will
continue to reflect the expressed desires of the majority of
the citizens.
(3) The existing and proposed transportation facilities, i.e.,
thoroughfares for the use of automobile traffic, will continue
to be the primary mode of travel in the City.
A balance of uses is proposed. The Land Use Plan assumes that
the demand for low density, Single-Family property will
continue to be the majority of the City's development
activity. However, a sufficient amount of commercial,
Industrial, and higher density residential (multi-family) areas
22
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Dimensioned
are proposed to satisfy the perceived economic development
needs of the City as expressed in the earlier Economic
Development discussion.
The Land Use Plan also addresses the concerns of the disparity
or non-compatibility of certain types of uses. Where possible
the proposed use areas have been placed with the idea of
providing separation or buffering between disparate uses.
This Future Land Use Plan is intended to be used as a guide for
future zoning and development decisions. The areas outlined in
the Future Land Use Plan are not exact nor are they
They cannot be identified as designating a specific parcel of
land. The intent of the plan is to provide a general outline of
each use type and to project the pattern of growth as it
relates to the overall development pattern of the City. In the
administration of the Plan it is not anticipated that the
Commission and the City Council will undertake a comprehensive
rezoning effort covering the entire city. Rather, as any
development is proposed the Commission and the City Council
will approve, disapprove, or modify those proposals based on
their conformance or compatibility with the Land Use Plan.
REDEVELOPMENT
Within the City at the present time there are existing
commercial and residential areas which are likely candidates
for redevelopment. Primarily these areas are situated in older
23
, .
I'
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
sections of the City where circumstances of time, type of
construction, and/or changing use patterns in the area create
pressure for change. Redevelopment of these areas can occur in
one of two possible ways. First, the existing structures can
be renovated, remodeled, or reconstructed to current building
codes for the proposed new use. Second, the existing structure
may be totally demolished and a new structure raised to serve
the new use.
The redevelopment and/or re-use of these older existing areas
represents good resource management of the City's assets and
within the framework of the proposed Land Use Plan this type of
re-use of existing resources will be encouraged.
3.
TRANSPORTATION/THOROUGHFARES
As stated earlier in this report one of the basic assumptions
of the preparation of the Comprehensive Master Plan is that the
individually-owned automobile will continue to be the dominant
mode of transportation in the forseeable future of the City.
Recognizing that fact the City Council commissioned the
firm of PAWA-Winkleman and Associates to prepare a Master
Thoroughfare Plan of the City. This Thoroughfare Plan is
an outline of all of the major streets of the City, both
existing and proposed. Included with the plan of the streets
24
I" ~ \
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
is provided a functional classification system which will
designate the size and type of street to be placed in each of
the designated locations.
The basic objective of the Thoroughfare Plan is to provide a
complete circulation system throughout the City. This proposed
plan must both dictate and respond to the elements of the
Future Land Use Plan of the City. That is, the system must, by
necessity, address both new developing areas of the City and
the existing fully developed areas.
In the approval of all new subdivisions the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council will utilize the Thoroughfare
Plan to direct developers in the requirement for additional
right-of-way on existing streets and the necessity for
providing new streets on alignments as dictated by the Plan.
The developer will be responsible for construction of the
required streets in any instance where the street is wholly
within the proposed subdi.vision, bounding the subdivision, or
providing major access to the subdivision. The City Council,
in order to encourage the construction of the needed
thoroughfares on a timely basis will participate in the
oversize costs of the Thoroughfares. It is the intent of the
City Council and the Commission that, as much as is possible,
the thoroughfare system will be constructed at the same time
that development occurs in an area.
25
t .
I"
I
~
I
The City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission also
recognize the absolute necessity to upgrade and improve the
existing thoroughfare system in fully developed areas. The
I
providing of and the improvement to Thoroughfares in developed
areas will accomplish two purposes. First, in areas where
I
previous commercial developments have overloaded existing
I
systems traffic jams can be alleviated. Second, improvements
in outdated and deteriorated streets which are functioning as
I
thoroughfares without the proper design capacities will improve
the accessibility to existing neighborhoods and aid in
I
sustaining these neighborhoods as a viable part of the
community. These type of improvements in existing areas
I
.
require specific commitments of city funds, such as bond
programs, and an aggressive approach in pursuing funding from
other governmental sources such as the State Department of
I
Highways and Public Transportation, Tarrant County and/or the
adjacent cities.
I
I
Very little has been said in this report or in the text of the
Master thoroughfare Plan regarding other alternative
I
transportation modes such as Mass Transit or Light Rail
Transit. The City's Transportation Consultant and the City
I
Staff have stated that it is not feasible that the City of
I
North Richland Hills alone could support or maintain a public
transit system. However, in light of recent activities in both
I
,
Dallas and Tarrant Counties toward the creation of County-wide
regional systems it would seem that the City has or will have
the opportunity to participate with the larger cities in the
I
26
I"'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
future planning of an overall system. Two major modes are
currently being explored, the standard bus transit and a light
rail transit system. Due to North Richland Hills strategic
location between downtown Ft. Worth and D/PW Airport the City
should avail itself of the opportunity to participate in the
planning of any transit system or mode which would provide
service to and/or through the City.
4. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE
Just as the Thoroughfare Plan provides the basic outline of the
City by providing the transportation network, the Basic
Utilities, water and sewer, dictate how the development of the
City is to proceed. The City of North Richland Hills currently
has an adequate network of both water and sewer facilities.
However, to insure that the system will continue to perform
with a high degree of reliability even at a full development
level, the City has contracted for a Master Plan of both the
Water and the Sewer systems of the City. The purpose for both
plans is to designate areas of the City in which additional
facilities will be needed to support the full development
improvements which could possibility be built. It is on the
basis of these documents that the City will work with the
developers to install the major transmission, distribution, and
collection facilities necessary to serve the overall city. It
is the intent of City Council and Planning and Zoning
Commission that in the review of every proposed development in
the City the needs of the overall water and sewer system will
27
I' .. ~
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
be addressed by requiring the developers to install the
oversize mains called for in the Master Plans for both water
and sewer. Under current subdivision criteria the city will
participate in the oversize costs of those required systems.
In addition, in fully developed areas the City will pursue an
active improvement and upgrading of facilities program. The
providing of proper utilities will enhance and support the
maintenance of existing neighborhoods. This in turn will
extend their useable life and keep them a viable part of the
community.
The City has also adopted a Drainage Master Plan for the entire
City. This plan identifies all of the major drainage systems
within the City and proposes a minimum design criteria for each
major channel required to contain the 100 Year Frequency Flood.
In addition, the minor systems which contribute the run-off to
these channels have been investigated and minimum design
criteria have been established for these systems. It is
the intent of the City Council and the Planning and Zoning
Commission that the data and design parameters contained in the
Master Drainage Plan be required as a minimum on all proposed
developments within the City.
The City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission also
recognize the necessity for improvements to existing drainage
systems within the established areas of the City.
Accomplishing the improvements in these areas of the City will
28
I I .f'
~
I
I
I 5. HOUSING
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
require specific commitment of funds by the City. The
expectation is that priority issues will be developed for
future bond programs. Additionally the City will investigate
any alternatives available through other governmental
agencies,such as the Corps of Engineers, for aid in funding
these improvements.
Currently the City has a good cross section of types of housing
stock. Some concern has been expressed that in isolated areas
there are pockets of very old (30 plus years) structures which
cannot meet the existing codes and are deteriorating. The
location and number of these units is not yet a major problem.
However, the City cannot automatically assume that property
owners and the marketplace needs of the City will always
protect and/or replace existing housing stock. A vigorous
active program of Code Enforcement is necessary to assure that
older neighborhoods continue to be fully utilized. As stated
earlier in this report some areas of the City will be under
pressure to redevelop or convert housing units to other uses.
While some conversion is appropriate, the wholesale conversion
of established neighborhoods will be avoided. Any significant
efforts toward major conversion must be evaluated in terms of
its effect on the Land Use Plan of the City.
The assumption that all new housing being constructed will be
of such quality that it will assure long term value and
permanent occupancy is not necessarily accurate. It is the
29
~
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
function of the City to ensure that specific controls are
maintained and specific levels are met. The quality of housing
construction will be in direct response to the level of
enforcement which the City exercises over its adopted Building
Codes.
Some discussion has been raised regarding the relationship
between minimum lot size and minimum house size to the long
term quality of construction. While it is to be expected that
a larger investment by a builder in both lot costs and required
minimum house costs will produce a higher value unit, it is
also true that this approach will produce less housing units in
any given subdivision. Therefore, these units will be
available to fewer people. Without the same level of required
inspections as the smaller units no guarantee can be given that
any significant improvement in the quality of construction can
be expected. It is up to the City to strike a balance of
housing types which will generate sufficient housing stock to
support the cross section of population expected to reside within
the City.
30
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1350
&)
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held public hearings
on the adoption of a Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map for the City
of North Richland Hills; and
WHEREAS, the City eouncil and the Planning and Zoning Commission
have held a joint public hearing to receive suggestions and recommendations
from the public on the Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map for the City
of North Richland Hills; and
WHEREAS, after the public hearings the Planning and Zoning
Commission has approved and recommended for adoption the Comprehensive Plan
for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas (1986) and the Future Land Use Map
of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas (1986).
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, that:
1.
The City Council finds that all procedural and substantive
requirements have been met for the adoption of a Comprehensive Plan and Future
Land Use Map for this City.
2.
The documents attached hereto, and made a part hereof, entitled
"Comprehensive Plan for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas (1986)" and
"North Richland Hills Future Land Use Map (1986)" be, and are hereby, adopted
and approved. The Comprehensive Plan adopted herein includes: (1) Master
Plan Analysis and Policy Statement, (2) Future Land Use Plan, (3) Thoroughfare
Plan, (4) Master Drainage Plan, (5) Master Water System Plan, (6) Master Sewer
System Plan, and (7) Park Master Plan. These documents are on file in the
Office of the City Secretary and are incorporated herein by reference.
3.
These documents shall serve as general guidelines and references for
the City Staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council in all
matters dealing with future land use and development of the City.
4.
The City Manager is authorized to print and publish these documents
in an appropriate form for use by the City and its inhabitants.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ordinance No. 1350
Page 2
PASSED AND APPROVED this 24~~day of March, 1986.
Dan Echols, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis, eity Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Rex McEntire, Attorney
-~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1350
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held public
hearings on the adoption of a Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map
for the City of North Richland Hills; and
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission
have held a joint public hearing to receive suggestions and recommendations
from the public on the Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map for the
City of North Richland Hills, and
WHEREAS, after the public hearings the Planning and Zoning
Commission has approved and recommended for adoption of the Comprehensive
Plan for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas (1986) and the Future Land
Use Map of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas (l986).
I
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas, that:
I
I
Ie
1.
The City Council finds that all procedural and substantive
requirements have been met for the adoption of a Comprehensive Plan and
Future Land Use Map for this City.
2.
I
I
I
The documents attached hereto, and made a part hereof, entitled
"Comprehensive Plan for the City of North Richland Hills, Texas (1986)" and
"North Richland Hills Future Land Use Map (1986)" be, and are hereby,
adopted and approved.
3.
These documents shall serve as general guidelines and references
for the City Staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council
in all matters dealing with future land use and development of the City.
4.
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
The City Manager is authorized to print and publish these
documents in an appropriate form for use by the City and its inhabitants.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of
, 1986
APPROVED:
· J dv tJ1f MAYOR
dJ·
I ..
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ATTEST:
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
'"'~4_lIIU~_~g"'"
Council Meeting Date:
, '1>"',.'
Plannin~ and Developmênt
Department:
SUbject:
Request of Earl McKinney, Trustee to Rezone a Aqenda Number: PZ 85-69
Portion of Tract 1 and IB, E.A. Cross Survey, Abstract 2~1
and Tract J-Wm. Cox Survey Abstract 321 from AG to C-l
ORDINANCE NO. 1272
I
This Zoning Application is presented on the vacant tract located along the east side of
Davis Boulevard north of Odell Street. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to
C-1 Commercial. The purpose for the proposed rezoning is to allow the applicants to
develop a commercial center.
I
I
I
The Staff noted to the Commission that this property had previously been requested for
Commercial Zoning. At that time the request covered a total of 15 acres. That previous
request was denied by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. The
current request has been reduced to 10.5 acres in size. The remaining acreage has been
proposed for residential zoning in Zoning Application PZ 85-68.
I
At the Commission hearing a large contingent of citizens from the Stoneybrooke and Odell
areas appeared in opposition to the requested rezoning. A petition was also filed which
did not contain sufficient signatures to require a three-fourths vote of the City
Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of Zoning Application PZ 85-69
requesting rezoning of a portion of Tract 1 and 1B, E.A. Cross Survey A-281, and Tract
3, Wm. Cox Survey Abstract 321 from AG to C-l. This hearing before the City Council is
in appeal of that denial.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
ent Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Rll/~
, City Manager
. Finance Director
Paqe 1 of 1
I'
~
Ca· ,
I Ii!>
t
,..,....,
J\ 't JItT."IEL» .. ..
AG
c-'
I'
~
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
(
(
February 10, 1986
Page 7
Councilwoman Moody stated the houses would be the same as in Stonybrooke only-
the lots would be smaller.
Mr. Don Chaille,'8405 Timberline, spokesman for the Stonybrooke
appeared before the Council.
Mr. Chaille stated he strongly opposed R-2
There being no one
Hearing.
Public
10.
ORDINANCE NO. 1271
APPROVED
avis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve
the stipulation of 1600 square foot houses.
carried 7-0.
11.
PZ 85-69 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING _
REQUEST OF EARL MCKINNEY, TRUSTEE, TO REZONE
A PORTION OF TRACTS 1 AND IB, E.A. CROSS SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 281 AND A PORTION OF TRACT 3, WILLIAM COX SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 321, FROM AG (AGRICULTURE) TO C-l (COMMERCIAL)
(LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD NORTH OF ODELL STREET)
Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak
in favor of this request to please come forward.
Mr. Delbert Stembridge, Engineer, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Stembridge stated that this property was bounded by commercial on the
north and west. Mr. Stembridge stated that Davis Boulevard was a major
thoroughfare and you would not want to build a home that backed up to Davis.
Mr. Stembridge stated he felt the highest and best use for the property was
commercial.
Councilman Kenna asked if a sight barring fence on the south and east would
be installed.
Mr. Stembridge replied yes.
Councilwoman Hinkle asked if there would be no access to the residential
areas from the property.
Mr. Stembridge replied no.
Mr. Stembridge asked the Council for rebuttal time.
Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request
to please come forward.
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
February 10, 1986
Page 8
Mr. V.L. Gibson, 8333 Odell, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Gibson stated.. that commercial zoning would increase traffic and devalue
property in the area and he felt it should be zoned residential. Mr. Gibson
stated there was already enough commercial in the area and this would not be
in the best interest for the city. Mr. Gibson asked that the Council vote
against this request.
Mr. Don Chaille, 8405 Timberline, appeared before the Council.
Mr. Chaille stated it would devalqe his property and he felt additional
commercial in the area was not needed.
Mayor Echols granted rebuttal time.
Mr. Stembridge reappeared before the Council.
Mr. Stembridge stated that Mr. Chaille's property backed up to existing
commercial and was not within 200 feet of this request.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated there was an existing 15 foot easement along the
south line of the property. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated there was a
possibility a drainage channel would be put there and asked how wide the
easement would be.
Mr. Stembridge stated the Master Drainage Plan called for a 20 to 30 foot
concrete channel.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that Mr. Stembridge would be required to erect a
sight barring fence.
Mr. Stembridge stated he was aware of the requirement for the fence.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public
hearing.
12.
ORDINANCE NO. 1272
DENIED
Mayor Pro Tern Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle to approve
Ordinance No. 1272.
eouncilman Ramsey stated he felt the residential area was being encroached
upon and he did not believe that commercial would be the best use.
Motion failed 4-3; Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Councilman Newman, and Councilwoman
Hinkle voting for and Councilwoman Moody, Councilmen Ramsey, Kenna and Fisher
voting against.
I
Page 20
P & Z Minutes
June 13, 1985
~
I
I
I
I
14. PZ 85-67
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
/
I
I
PZ 85-67
APPROVED
I
I
f
I
(
(
Chairman Bowen stated it does better
fit the zero lot line zoning. This
gives more protection, but it allows
homes with small lots and puts a 1,2
square foot minimum instead of the
1,000, requires them to have gar es,
and they can be attached or de ched.
The motion carried 4-0.
Request of Clifford A.
rezone Tract lA, Tho as Sprouse
Survey, Abstract 1 9, from its
present classifi ation of AG
(Agriculture) 0 R-3 (Single Family).
This proper is located on the south
side of B sey Road and the west side
of DO~S Lane.
Cha~an Bowen opened the Public
H~ring and called for those wishing
~? speak in favor of this request to
~ please come forward.
/
Delbert Stembridge, Consulting
Engineer, came forward. He said to
the south of this property is R-3
zoning, to the west is Commercial, and
across the street is in Keller and
they request a zoning change to R-3.
Chairman Bowen called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve
PZ 85-67. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
4-0.
Chairman Bowen stated the next two
requests would be heard together but
would be voted on separately.
I
Page 21
P & Z Minutes
June 13, 1985
--
I
15. PZ 85-68
I
I
I
I
16. PZ 85-69
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
Request of Earl McKinney, Trustee to
rezone a portion of Tracts 1 & 1B, E.
A. Cross Survey, Abstract 281, and a
portion of Tract 3, William Cox
Survey, Abstract 321, from their
present classification of AG
(Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Family).
This property is located east of Davis
Boulevard and bounded on the east by
Stonybrooke Addition.
Request of Earl McKinney, Trustee, to
rezone a portion of Tracts 1 & 1B, E.-
A. Cross Survey, Abstract 281, _and a
portion of Tract 3, William Cox
Survey, Abstract 321, from their
present classification of AG
(Agriculture) to C-l (Commercial).
This property is located on the east
side of Davis Boulevard and west of
Stonybrooke Addition.
Chairman Bowen opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of these requests to
please come forward.
Delbert Stembridge, Consulting
Engineer, came forward. He stated
this tract fronts on a a major
highway, Davis Boulevard. He said
they have requested a buffer of R-3
between Stonybrooke and the request
for Commercial. Mr. Stembridge said
the area requested for Commercial has
a lot of drainage problems and would
not be suitable for single family.
Chairman Bowen called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
Donald Chaille, 8405 Timberline Court,
came forward. He said he was speaking
for the residences in Stonybrooke and
on Odell Street. He stated that they
previously asked for Commercial on the
entire tract.
I Page 22 (
P & Z Minutes
June 13, 1985
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
(
Mr. Chaille said the property owners
are against these requests because
they want to protect their property
value. He said there is already
enough Commercial on Davis Boulevard,
plus the traffic is bad now and this
would make it worse. Mr. Chaille said
nothing has changed, the neighbors
protest both requests and request the
entire 15 acres be restricted to R-2,
residential. He said R-3 will not be
good enough, 7500 square foot lots
instead of 9000 and 1400 square foot
houses instead of 1600. Mr. CQaille
read an article from the Star Telegram
regarding problems in North Richland
Hills. He said he felt this would be
spot zoning. Mr. Chaille asked what
the Master Plan shows for this area
and asked why couldn't this area be
developed as R-2 Single Family. He
said he had submitted petitions on
both cases and requested a show of
hands of those who were in opposition
to these requests.
P. C. McGreggor came forward. He said
the only reason Davis Boulevard is
going Commercial is the Commission is
granting it. He said it will soon be
another Belknap Street. Mr. McGreggor
said in Dallas and Fort Worth there
are busy highways with nice homes on
both sides so why can't they build R-2
Single Family homes on this entire
tract.
Mr. McGreggor said Mr. Burk Collins
was in previously with property to the
south of this property and he was told
he would have to take care of the
drainage; will this property drain
onto the property Mr. Collins had.
Mr. Royston said the developer must
take care of the drainage on his site
and the adjacent area.
Mr. McGreggor said he is against these
requests.
I'
~
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 23
p & Z Minutes
June 13, 1985
(
PZ 85-68
DENIED
PZ 85-69
DENIED
(
Chairman Bowen said he does not feel
this would be spot zoning because
there is Commercial all along Davis
Boulevard.
v. L. Gibson, 8333 Odell Street, came
forward. He said he had lived here
for 33 years and he believes it is
spot zoning and feel they should keep
Commercial away from residential. Mr.
Gibson said they have 28 acres of
Heavy Industrial to the south of his
property and this would make
Commercial to the north. He said they
have retail across the street and in--
between is residential. Mr. Gibson
said they are only asking R-3 for 270
feet of the 1000 feet which is no
buffer. He said he felt this was
going against the Master Plan.
Chairman Bowen closed the Public
Hearing.
Chairman Bowen said he was not sure
R-3 was a good plan for the small
tract because there was no entrance to
it.
Ms. Nash made the motion to deny
PZ 85-68. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny
carried 3-1 with Mr. Tucker voting
against denial.
Ms. Nash made the motion to deny
PZ 85-69. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny
carried 3-1 with Chairman Bowen voting
against denial.
Chairman Bowen stated the next tw
requests would be heard to er but
voted on separatel
17. PZ 85-70
Roger & Joan Hanson to
zone Lot 4, Block 1, Martin
Addition, from its present
classification of AG (Agriculture) to
R-2 (Single Family). This property is
located west of Precinct Line Road and
adjacent to Nab Hill Addition.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
)
KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
May 22, 1985 -
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONI~G CASE PZ 85-69 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM AG TO C-1
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 70
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
~~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
Zoning Review PZ 85-69 Page 1
1901 CENTRAL 0 R., SU ITE 550 · BED FORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/26 7-336 7
I,~,~~" .' 1 ~111
Ie To: City Council ( /I¿,q% ( Date:
Ci ty of North Richland Hills Case: # 85-69
We, the residents living within 200' of subject property in PZ 85-69, object
II to the rezoning of said tract to C-l Commercial for the following reasons:
This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health,
convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the present
II neighborhood.
SIGNlTURE DATE ADDRES~
~_.. --,-_.~,---- ..-----__~-~-~- t??t'Y;.. ð¡;( 4~:____
, 'i~~. "!¿fa -_..._,,_.---/P~=-2J.S. 096 L/ Co~ ~.
Lk.~ ,~.L1.Ja¿~1'4~--.------~~~' ~ _~Ct~__.___ ~ 9¿ð ~7------._-
'K~ ------.----!~;-i1 - fi;¿~¿ (N. .-
IK 'Z!v:;'~. , .,..- -_ ¿-I.-?--5r, rJ2:l ()/~~L. :57:
.- "7 /~ A ~ I -'1'1-
).~ . ¿J / L "J) Q <- - ç '3 '7? (9-/7 , . ,Ç'" ,{,
~ '11ð./!._.~~..,.J"Æ¿'4...-(~.__"::.1,.._.\..k(..... ~>!~.c.:J-....!-e_:,c.,~.::..~_.. ___.- . ÞW. ~ Ij 4.-..:::::....~"...'.___~_.. ~___,_
II -;!::£lcp ..(zY~..(7i'--- b - (,; -y ~_____~_;¡ ;¿_-i2w a.::L/''l -<1.. -
(j' .-/J ./ 11" r- ~/ ~~ <7 -7 /?..,I" /J;f
oK ~':--Þ'----Ø o?c', ~;:~'';''7 ~4 .k' ~... / '2 -"J ...J 0 __ ~ ,; ,'-_ ,;/-,¿;".r<.,. .... _..",,,___ _
II ~~~.:.~·~.7~ - .CÞ -/,2 ,I> f~o/,,~~.~_--~--..,
K /. " ,. , ," ,," __ ;,,, ,_'.., , __ _ ... ~,_:.... , _,__~.._~...:::.~.. __> : : :~;-:..S:: .____ _~~__
I .. -_L:.¿_-/_·.: ~!~.~~'.;..( -- _.:. .... -,/ J - .(..: --' -, ,," .. .... ___
n - {,./- - - . .... ..'_'___'_h,.. ..._ 0,_.# _. _.._. ....__.__~..____..____._._ ._.._......____.~... .,
1,-1:1- ¥
c' 1/
o . "...
~.
t/
II
...., ~- . - --------- ---.-- ."-,-------------. - .
II "'''-''-----'--'
II ---.---- ,-
I ...............~",- .----...........----.-..----................. ~............~.....-..-~--~~..............-....-
. ... . ..-... ..-..-....--... ---..-. -....-.....-.............-..-.... -----.-....-......- ~
--.-. -_..- -".-"" - .-__~. _._ e. _ , ..~~..
I
I ~-----,-,
.---.- '---....-.-..------- -... .---...~---..----~.-~-..-.---..---,.. ·"-·"_r._-.
le_
I
. -." -..-....... ....
. -...-...-.......-..................--....-......-.......
_.............--.-.- -----
-
. ,J-...........-....:.. ..." ....._.,.«...,......... _-...... ........_...... ...._.............~. .....
-~._-- . -.;,..'_....,--
.,... .-...........---..,.. .".-.'- .
...., ____.. .r_._..-"_......... _______..._-.-.---....
---..... -- ....,
....- --' ..... '-- .._._........._-..~........-....-..............-.........~~.-.-..~...............-----.-.....~-_.........-..~.............~
Ib.. .....-.-,,...~....-_4II81V
... . .-....................-.-.... _... ........_.........~...........'.._.,..-----~...
~ ....~.... ,................
.-
..A. ...... ~ ~...~....'-."...
~_. -..~...............-~---.,--.... '.....---..... --. -......-.. ....,.~.....--.. --- .---- ...~.. ....-....---.....-...........
"
. - ........ ........-.-......
.I'....-....~ ..........~_'......~'..........__._...................._. --....,--.....__.. ...
I·...·
I ,.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
.. --,.,
)Þ
~:
(
(
t -/:5' - }"~'-
3:~1
Datel~ ~
Case: PZ ..85-68 & {/
85-69
We object to the rezoning of said tract in PZ85-68 to R-3 for the following
reason;
To: Ci ty Council
City of North Richland Hills
An R-3 designation will adversely affect the property values of
residents nearby where classification is R-2
We also object to the reclassification of property in PZ85-69 to C-l
for the following reasons:
This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health,
convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the
present neighborhood. _
SIGNlTURE IÞ
DATE
ADDRESS
. _b,,-c¡~g~=,-~- ,._-..".i.fL1-~~d'
" _,... nO ~:_rz '"::_~-:__,___,.fc.f(d _d~___-·
~ þ];¡;' '.AÞ{¿: ¡{£':z:L'd_/~'~ . . . 6-c?~J~." _ ((7 (~:'(' /.£<.~q._,.-- -----
.'_ ¡J . /"" ..... . . -,
, ,,(_,__"-:\L4¿.. ,:Þ;::-;-'7r-'{"!A¿·o~'Le~., ..._ _ ._..~_:,7::.S.s:.. . _..Þ ,,~2.z.!_~~y~~S-..
~ ~.ª~~._.._______._f~.JÞ~_I_~____Ji1 (,6 ...~;~_IøÄ - êd
'._..__ ..::/1:: ÝLJ'f':;<JJJ~W/~~__
.' . c cc~ c .,(=(/-:.,fr,_ð.V1L¡;""ð_~!-:-~~cC/r
_,__~_._1J ~~., 'dO"_"__ t .,=/L.. -~J=_.._f~~~o d:__,
,J4Ill-_.tf)· Iff ~þ ... 'c , /~. -=// ,', Ys--=--f'/f 3$. _c;J~,..(-;,~~. ..~
-Ch: ~~Q~, -{.--!/._~ç¿y~£~~~~~,~~_...ºt~,---
. " 6 ~/I..=,£J-·_--,·~~4-~ Ä (?4.--~
,~¥_~~~._._...., _.."...__..,_-'-Ji-.~s- 91/;;1/ c7~~~_
¡-:;~J-H2? 7 __J~,_____.__0_-:-.!/ ts- f1/c2. rß/u¿t)Ã!/7~!/J /CL
~~~' ~--_....__.._~ ~--!~_;; - ~i !d- ß¿ ;~F ;;~d-TI-_d_'--
-Z ..-....- .-'-.f'/:.- _.J¿_i~__, ." ----..-. -- . ".'
J-\, ,",1, J+--=- & - Î: - '7.; % 4-r) : !()~ _ .
¿;/~ '/~~---'-----"-~ =~::_~~ ;;; ~r ~fZf 12~.--
~'~~ /';~YJ~ ~~ ----~-'- -'-'-~~~-~ ; '~~~;J~~:~~- - -..~ ;(~ '-Ll{:.&?!-L':~~:: ~ -,~¿::--~
GL-!' // 7~..£.!L~---~---, c:::..~~.~,:-_--:,':JI c-~.( t"" /' :..-;/ p'!' o~v-þ'~
.A::6//4d.f4//;·~ 6 - //-?-5' ¿d/~:Jv$r~~;k:h4f/___.~~ '£.'.-
,"771· ~ ¡;-~-D1- --... -.... ~- ~. /) ...../J 1
m I ¡ '/ /1.1 //,. ) · r,._ tJ ' L' tf ~lJ: ..
'd 'L1&..-J~_: "i¿'_~~~ . _,,_ 'U'_ r:¿.._-:_/-¡_,~L~___JL.!l.. ()J_~ /l., '.4 pJ'~ck/!
tJ:!A~ ·
t,-/3-t
I' '~"", ( ( 1,' )/
~LrTO: City Council Di1te:- ~
~ r1 JI City of North Richland Hills . Cùs"~: p¿ _~;:~~ &
I/~ '14 We object to the rezoning of said tract in P:'::f35-6U to R-3 for thc: follo~1ÌnCJ
.I'~ ~ \ reason;
I ;J c~~l An R"3 designation will adversely affCC. t the property vùluGS of
~o~ f? residents nearby \'-lhere classification is H-2
I ~...d)·r ~'¡e also object to the reclassification of pl'operty in PZfJ~;-(i') to C-1
\,:9~,~", for the following reasons:
-1 / ø· A] This rezoning \,-lould not be conductive to public sa.fety, health,
I ~ eh ~ ¡1-' convenience, comfort, prosperity, or general welfùce of th.~
~. present neighborhood.
~I ,\ SIGNlTURE DATE ADDHI:;.'j.'j
I~' f,' ~,~v9J._,u_p ,
. A-u.J
I '-'~-, /lJ~(l191Q
I --', -'~1 .1j ~l~~~ ,
r ,D~,,, . v Þr
I ,.. ~~
~ IG- ¡t1; 5r hit I ~
__ ~"--, ;~~7,1
I /~t' ~- ,/
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
/P"I 0,-85
~ -!O~)'ç
b-/D-8'S-
~-ID-t~
(p-{o /KÇ
t -/ò - ,?S-
~ -/CJ-?5
b--;tÞý{;'
t ·-/Ô-ð-.s
6'-/0 -f)
b- /;2- ð-5-
---...--.-. .~. - ....~... ...
.., .. -. .... -.. .. .. ..
...--- ---..------..----- -- ----
- ..-.--.---.--....----.------..- ...----.- .....
~
~----,---------......__.. ..~_.. ---.-..----......--.. -
- ----- - - --. - .'. ~ - ....
b... __......... _
~.---------_.. ~- - --.... -- -...-
"---~."'~"--"'---~........_,,",", . .-----...._~-. ......
....--.----------~-- - -.. -. '.----------.--- --
-------------
VA-.~ lJJz;t:
7/33 ~b~
? IJ S- ..s~ yh/'iXlke
7/25S~HfJ,t.
'7/~S~4t£l,.
, c?W6 ~~ÆÞ
,,7/~ ¿;TcN œr I3rð-o~
'/~ r~~ ørv-<'~
'> ¿p-c:;7 S T t7Y ,l?y ¿p~
11;L~ '5TõIVf bhvK Dr,
7/ 2/ ,ç-X:1br6~;~'¡;'~
-- .--.... - .. ~
.. ----.. . _. i/O- ..
Þf./~<~ /.IQ,~ f :; _~, -b._-=LL_:L~h_,ff ~l /?-â'':þ;b~~~1 )t/H
4-- ~ ~' ~ - / I.... r:S Z # J:t'" c 7.~"."):;..I,!£.t--I.~¡¡;;-6t":,r-P~
"p~"~ 1l ,c -->~'~~._-'~',.- " '¿'-'---i;:::'-'---; / H_~___ Å-- {1- 'lb í~
S-~-u.¿~-!2-~~L~~}_li~·7{...:.1 - -J! c~ .~- '._ 71.ð ¡ ~<":~"'~~l~~~ ~
·~t~ ~t~~~--~ .~~-
~, ~
I·' -Y',
--
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
.
I
I
I ----".",
I
I
I
I
--.'
I
I
(
(
1-/.5-~
~,,'þl
Date:- ~
Case: PZ -85-68 &
85-69
for the following
To:
Ci ty Council
City of North Richland Hills
We object to the rezoning of said tract in PZ85-68 to R-3
reason;
An R-3 designation will adversely affect the property values of
residents nearby where classification is R-2
We also object to the reclassification of property in PZ85-69 to C-1
for the following reasons:
This rezoning would not be conductive to public safety, health,
convenience, cOmfort, prosperity, or general welfare of the
present neighborhood. _
SIGNITURE
DATE
ADDRESS
._._-~------------_.~ .-.,..- -----.----.--- -..---.... ,
---.--
-~------
. ,-~. _.... -..... - " -.....O'
.. .. "'4. ~#... ..t,___.w _.'..........-...,.
--------.- ---..-.-..,....--
..-.. ---..--...-. _.--. -.,. .. -...-'--..... ,,- ....-.,....
..................... ~ ..............- -.. -........ - ......... ..~........
-... -...--- -. - ..--
- . - .... - ._--...
..... -.....-....,.¡,.-. .....,...._......_......',...~...... ._-...~-...
. . ,.,.. ...··......r_---....._....·... . "...'...........4....~...~_
.....-.. -~.-. -_...- _. _.~'_._--....-_._-_. ..~.._..~--.._....._-......._.__...------::-
.. - .. ~ - -.... --
. . -,þ- ......, -.--.....--.....--- -....--.......- _ .__4' _..6_ ~_". _-"......,. ...,~~~..
----
,- .. . ....
.. -... - .
".... ........ '.. .. - _.- ........., .. _.
... - .-.-_..-........"....................---...~...
------- " .-~-~-...--.. ........ _..··...r...
..."'..... ---. . - ........-~..--~..........-.....-...--. ~
--_.__..~._..._~._~-----_.._...- .~-- -------.--------
----- -.--- -_.~._- --_._-,~--~. ----
-----------~._-
-....-...- ~ .,
-... - ------------..... ------------ - ...
---
~
---~ .. -.
--- ...---- ---.- .......-'.-...----.--.---------....
.---.----
'----
-----------.. .------.---- ----- -- _. . .-.-- -.----. ---
I
<:
.......
n
.......
z
.......
-i
-<
~
>
-c
~'"
. . \
~~\
j ~\~\
þ'
Q
DA vIS
8£. vD
:Þ
fn
"'1J
o
to
I
rw1~
~'"
nn
:00
0:;0
&IIZ
utrw1
:u
&II
co
:0"
<
rw1
~
-
...
.Q
~
.
Z
00
...
...- ~
:1". CD
JI-C
_~nJJ
C')coC-
:r _ :J
. ~ Q
I -m
Am:
s.~..
%...a
:-m)Þ
....:aa»
· OD cþ
....,.;-0
· · · 0
)I ~.
....-
.....>
~ ...
..-.. m
ca~ CD
..CI
....
Qtl
..
W
ca
c.
CD
-t
m
z
o
Z
at
co
.
""
0)
..c:
"
tit
.....
""
o
IV
"
~,
,
J
-IÞ
o
c..
~ to'.
\CUI
N,.,
VlGJ
='
IÞn
n tD
'1
ttI 0
œ~
o~
~w
~
_.
AlO
:JO
Q.
~
E tD
o ttI
'1"
ttI
,.,
o 0
'1
,.,
-::r
lÐ lÐ
(I)
fl)Þt:
o
H
Z
""'i
\f\
y
~
o
ú\
ú\
ú\
c:
~
~
~
ú\
~
&II
C
r-
rw1
~
c
N
o
o
~.~
~
...............
Ì\~
~. 0$.3' r~ ~~
<1../>. ..It
~..¡ ~f,: .
tJftJ ~,..
'88,
'*
...
o
â
>
&)
",
ua
9 01-12141. W. "'.0 1
o~
"':r:
tTJ
þ; Z
trln
OtTJ
~
Zen
2:0
~~
o:r
o
AI....
=' ·
Co....
N
n ..
O~
='-
" :
Q)
to'. ~
=' tÐ
to'. (I)
=' ",
00...
~~
0=
tott'J'l
Z
nn
Oll!
Þ1
:3 en
tDO
tot e
... "
:r
CD
~
~
0\
lI!
IÞ
fD
"
.."
o
...
..
0.
to' .
(IJ
,.,
III
::J
n
tD
o
~
~
~
\0
co
o
~ ." tD
" OIÞ
tD .... If)
" ::J"
"
", ,.,
o ..".
00
IÞ '1'
~
"0 n.
o 0
.... '1_
::J ::J to' .
" tD:3
'1 tD
tv
CP
~
~
Q
o~
..,,:X:
tr1
~z
IÞn
<trJ
....
eft IÞ
....
b:fo
Þ-'::J
<00
Co
en
ID
.." ....
00.
'1
n
IDe
'1
a-<
...·tD
en
""
IDO
:3
n",
":r
tD
o
""tot
þoO .
'-"00
O\::r
Þ-' "
o,.,~
..,..::r:x:
tDtrJ
.... Z
Q)C"n
~tDtrJ
Q)OQ
.... Z
\O::JO
\O:Stot
þoO. "
"":3::r
tDoo
tD Þ-'
~~~
....
......
n
etlt
"'lib
< fI)
It"
".."
00
'1
"
:rID
"
0.
tot ... .
þoO. œ
00"
::rib
":s
- n
"
œ
Ib 0
.... ~
c..
VI
n .
ew
'10
<
"..,..
..
:rf1)
Ib"
<
...."
:J 0
OQ
II
II
eo
toto
Ib ... .
c..::J
.... "
e
..,
"
~ID
'-":J
Co
~
tD c:
tD ... .
""
:r
",
0"
::r
II tD
..,.. ~ n ~
o::c 0 =
tot tTJ '1 tr1
Z =':z
IÞn tDn
tI1 '1 tit
Co
.... :z: .... Z
cno :so
"'1 "'I
Ib" ""
:S:r ::r :r
n "
tD .... CD
o~ ~"i.
",N en w
" "0\
N ..
~ '1
o tI1 .... ~
Ib 00 tD
0(1) :rœ
0" ","
I
.." IÞ 0..
tD.... "'
tD 0 I a-
" :s c:....
OIQ Is œ
" '<"
0" IÞ
:r .... :s
ID" .... n
:3 :s "
œ "
IÞ 0
Ib ... . 0..,..
::J 0. .."
00 "
Þ-'RI C'-"
tDlÞ Ib~
fD <.
eo" .... w
o .0
.... ,.,
:s . cø .."
"0 .... RI
< "
~ 0."
"
0' .......0
.." '"
. CD
t:7 :J:
IÞ . "0
< 0
... . .... ....
· \0:3
w"
= co
.... ....... ..,..
< ... 0
0. ...
~9.J
ð)
£:.
~ ua "-
at '"",
CD
.
("\ UI
0 ~
~ !"
ú\
c: ..
~ UI
CD
'1It
~ ~
n
I
...
Y
,!....-\
I
,.
'*
u>
~
---
~
N
þ; 2:n
tI100
0'13:
......"~
z::rtTJ
z 2:
~Q)n
Z\Ot-4
o .z
WO
00\
.." .. Is
"
"~
::rtD"
RlfI)::r
"tD
:r..
III eft
'11Þ0
tD e
.... 0. "
:s þoO':r
. tD
Q."Q)
IIIIbUt
œ:s"
nn
'1"n
.... 0
0"0...
tD "":3
Co "
N'1
"~
'100
IÞ. ..,..
no
"0,.,
:r
""'tD
RI
tDtTJ
", .
>
"h
0:0
o
"CJ)
;(1)
en
Þt: c::
0,.,
t-4<
ZtTJ
";t<
o
'W]~
::r
tD
:s
n
tD
C">"ca
tÐ C" &I tTJ
.... (I) '1 ~
='"'12
00· GJO
::I
EN"IÞ
OCO
"'IÞ-'n"
tD... 0 '1
c: AI
"OGJ::In
GJ::I""
'1 c.. '<
" .. 0
.... " .. .....
n::r.,
CtÞtÐ_
- >CD:
GJ~&I::I
'1t-4Utc..
Þ-' t"'" ..
'< t"'" rÞ
t-4 GJ ... .
c..>::I,.,.
~XQ.c:
(I) GJ
nnC""
'10tÐRI
þoO. >< .... a-
0'" :J
tD en OQ ... .
Q.C:: ::I
""0
O"<:~,.,.
'< tTJ ... ::r
1"(""
S-
ib on
" > ..,.. to'.
RI 0'" ,.,.
co fI) ,.,. '<
"::r
GJ· "0
::J ~
Q.ZP,
o· Z
0". >0
o '1
c:w ,.,.
::s"-'n::r
c._:;o
(I)... 0:;0
en þoO.
OJ GJ t/) n
CÞ::I :r
o.en_
~ C::OJ
o "::1
Þ-' <c..
- [T
o t<::
C .. ....
(I) Þ-'
-
(IJ
..-'
~
tTJ
ÞOOi
tit
t/)
>
Z
~
ca
o
c
:z
o
t/)
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1272
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
- HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-85-69 the following described property shall
be rezoned from AG to c-l.
BEING a tract of land situated in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant
County, Texas, and being part of the E. A. Cross Survey, Abstract 281, and
the William Cox Survey, Abstract 321, and being more particularly described
by metes and bounds as follows:
COMMENCING at the southeast corner of the E. A. Cross Survey, Thence North
89 degrees 36 minutes West, a distance of 270.00 feet to the point of
beginning of the herein described tract;
THENCE North 89 degrees 36 minutes West a distance of 757.30 feet to a
point for corner in the east right-of-way of Davis Blvd. (F.M. 1938);
THENCE North 18 degrees 27 minutes East along the said east R.O.W. of Davis
Blvd. for a distance of 240.00 feet to an angle point;
THENCE North 18 degrees 11 minutes East for a distance of 5.30 feet to a
point at the beginning of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius
of 1848.99 feet;
THENCE along said curve to the right and with the east R.O.W. line of Davis
Blvd. for a distance of 561.75 feet to a point for corner;
THENCE South 89 degrees 36 minutes East for a distance of 439.80 feet to a
point for corner;
THENCE South 01 degrees 12 minutes 41 seconds West, a distance of 733.00
feet to the point of beginning and containing 10.4925 acres of land, more
or less.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Page 2
This property' is located on the east side of Davis Boulevard and west of
Stonybrooke Addition.
DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 1985.
CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
~,e(?-' ~
ISSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-85-69 IS HEREBY REZONED C-1 THIS 26th DAY OF AUGUST, 1985.
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
REX McENTIRE, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
:::-
f' .,
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Department: Planning and Development
-SUbject: Request of M.F. Martin to Rezone Tract 5 J
I Wm. D. Barnes Survey, Abstract 146, from AG to R- .
Ordinance No. 1351
C "I M t" D 3/24/86
ounCI ee Ing ate:
Agenda Number: PZ 86-1
I
I
1
This Zoning Application is presented on the tract located on the north side of John
Autrey Road east of Red Oak Drive. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-2
Single Family. The purpose for the requested rezoning is to allow for the development
of the subject tract into single family lots in conformance with the R-2 Single Family
District.
The Thoroughfare Plan for this area designates John Autrey Road as a two lane undivided
Collector Street. The applicants will be required to provide an additional dedication
of right of way to allow for the development of the street in the required
configuration.
The Staff noted that the preliminary plat layout submitted with the rezoning request
proposed that the street on this tract be an extension of Ridgeway Avenue south of John
Autrey terminating in a cul-de-sac within the subject tract. This layout is not
consistent with the previous approval given for the proposed Chasewood Subdivision north
of this tract. A street was included in that plat which terminated at the north line of
the applicant's tract which would have been extended through this property.
RECOMMENDATION:
_The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-1
requesting rezoning on Tract 5, Wm. D. Barnes Survey Abstract 146 from AG to R-2 be
approved.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget _
~ -
~
epartrrtent Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
Rl1J~
. Finance Director
City Manager
Paoe 1 of 1
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
R-2
fl09
R-2
t
Itþ;
I
AG
AG
R-2
U11
XR.'Z
12.63
R-2
'1t8
.,..
I
Page 7
P & Z Minutes
February 13, 1986
(
Ie
I
7.
PZ 86-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
PZ 86-1
APPROVED
I
8.
PS 86-2
I
I
1
I
Ie
I
(
Request of M. F. Martin to rezone
Tract 5, William D. Barnes Survey,
Abstract 146, from its present
classification of ~ (Agriculture) to
R-2 (Single Family). This property is
located on the north side of John
Autry Road at Ridgeway Avenue.
Vice Chairman Wood opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Mr. Martin came forward. He said he
had owned the property for 25 or 26
years and had lived on the property 9
years. Mr. Martin stated he now lives
at 3856 Diamond Loch West, but plans
to move back out to this property
along with his son and daughter.
Vice Chairman Wood called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Vice Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve
PZ 86-1. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Hallford and the motion carried
3-1 with Mr. Schwinger voting against.
Request of M. F.
preliminary plat
Subdivision.
Vice rman Wood stated they
sently have a plat with a street
stubbed out into this property but
this property shows a cuI de sac.
Mr. Martin stated his property is a
more secluded area which has larger
lots than the addition to the north.
He said it is heavily wooded.
·
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(
(
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
January 8, 1986
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 86-1 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM AG TO R-2
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 51
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
f2dad-W, (J~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.,
R\1A/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
Zoning Review
PZ 86-1
Page
1
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 .. METRO/267-3367
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
~.
.. .
ORDINANCE NO. 1351
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-1 the following described property shall be
rezoned from AG to R-2.
ALL that certain tract or parcel of land being situated in the William D.
Barnes Survey, Abstract 146, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas
and being that same tract described in deed recorded in Volume 3949, Page
2386, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being further described by
metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a steel rod, by deed call of 1475.0 feet East and 815.41 feet
South 00 degrees 39 minutes East from the Northwest corner of said Barnes
Survey; said point being in the East line of Kingswood Estates, Section 2,
as recorded in Volume 388-125, Page 81, Deed Records, Tarrant County,
Texas.
THENCE South 89 degrees 46 minutes 44 seconds East along the northerly
South property line of a 33.064 acre tract described in deed recorded in
Volume 7072, Page 1317, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, 304.28 feet to
a found steel rod;
THENCE South 00 degrees 05 minutes 00 seconds East along the West property
line of a 2.0 acre tract described in deed recorded in Volume 4811, Page
337 of Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, 487.75 feet to a found steel
rod on the North right-of-way of John Autry Road (50+ foot Public R.O.W.);
THENCE North 89 dégrees 48 minutes 45 seconds West along the North R.O.W.
of said John Autry Road 292.10 feet to a found steel rod at the South
corner of Lot 1, Block 10 of said Kingswood Estates, Second Filing;
THENCE North 01 degrees 30 minutes 46 seconds West along the East boundary
line of said Kingswood Estates 488.14 feet to the place of beginning and
containing 3.339 acres of land.
I
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
Page 2
This property is located on the north side of John Autry Road at Ridgeway
Avenue.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF FEBRUARY,
1986.
VICE CHA!
.' ~CO¡;;:// ~
~ .--"'~. ~#,., C. /
S~Y'- PLANN:C-~~~;~:~~ON
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-86-1 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 24th DAY OF MARCH, 1986.
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
I"
}" -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
Department:
3/24/86
Council Meeting Date:
Subject:
Request of Bryan's Fast Stop to Rezone
Part of Lot 5R, Block 4, Richland Terrace Addition
from LR to LR-SU.
Ordinance No. 1352
Agenda Number: PZ 86-2
This Zoning Application is presented on a portion of the existing Commercial Strip
Center located on the northeast corner of Susan Lee Lane and Loop 820. The requested
rezoning is from LR Local Retail to LR-SU Local Retail Specific Use-Sale of Beer for
Off-Premise Consumption. The applicants are renovating an existing space in the
shopping center to a convenience store use. They propose to sell package Beer with
their grocery items.
Several Citizens from the surrounding residential neighborhood appeared in opposition to
the proposed change. A petition was submitted which did ~ meet the 20% criteria.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-2
requesting rezoning on a part of Lot 5R, Block 4, Richland Terrace Addition from LR to
LR-SU be denied. This hearing before the City Council is in appeal of that denial.
I
1
I
I
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
(( 'tt/ ~
t Head Signature , City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
, Finance Director
-
Paae 1 of
1
,J ...
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
Page 9
p & Z Minutes
February 13, 1986
9.
PZ 86-2
I
(
r
Request of Bryan's Fast Stop to rezone
part of Lot 5R, Block 4, Richland
Terrace Addition, from its present
classification of LR (Local Retail) to
LR-Specific Use-Sale of beer for off
premise consumption. This property is
located at 7651 Northeast Loop 820,
Suite D.
Vice Chairman Wood opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Steve Gorman, 4709 Scot Briar, Fort
Worth, came forward.
Vice Chairman Wood asked if they had
received their permit from the State.
Mr. Gorman stated they had not.
Vice Chairman Wood called for those
wishing to speak in oPposition to this
request to please come forward.
Billie Griffin, 4801 Susan Lee Lane,
came forward. He stated he had lived
here for 21 years. He said when he
moved here neither 820 nor the car
lots were built. Mr. Griffin stated
this neighborhood had previously been
a nice neighborhood, but now it is
almost a ghetto. He said you can hear
Hudiburg all the time. Mr. Griffin
said this area may someday go
commercial, but for now, he would like
to keep it nice. He said there is
very heavy traffic and cars park in
the street. He said one house has 8
cars. Mr. Griffin stated this place
of business does not have enough
parking places. He said all the
neighbors on the street signed a
petition except one. Mr. Griffin
stated if this is passed, this would
be the straw that broke the camel's
back. He said they do not need a beer
joint there.
I' Page 10 (
P & Z Minutes
Ie February 13, 1986
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
.....
(
James Wilson, 4705 Susan Lee Lane,
came forward. He said he lives on a
corner lot on the west side of Susan
Lee Lane. He said they have a problem
with traffic and noise. Mr. Wilson
said if this request is approved, it
would increase the possibility of a
child being hit. Mr. Wilson said he
walked the street getting signatures
on a petition against this request and
everyone signed it except one person.
He asked the Commission if they had
seen this area. He said Susan Lee
Lane was a cut through street to the
freeway. Mr. Wilson asked that they
come to his house during business
hours and hear the noise. He said the
car lots test the cars on this street.
Mr. Wilson said he would go as far as
he has to to keep this from being
approved.
Starline Autrey, 4800 Susan Lee Lane,
came forward. He said he is very much
opposed to this request. He said they
hear Hudiburg and Huggins Honda loud
speakers all the time. Mr. Autrey
said he was not opposed to Kidd
Plumbing being there, but when the men
get off work, they would like to have
a beer. Hé asked what control would
we have. Mr. Autrey said he would
appreciate it if the Commission would
not approve this request.
Vice Chairman Wood closed the Public
Hearing.
Vice Chairman Wood asked Mr. Royston
about the parking requirements.
Mr. Royston stated we have no control
over this. He said it is an existing
building with existing parking which
is non-conforming. He said Local
Retail zoning allows this use.
Vice Chairman Wood asked what about
the non-conforming use.
'~
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Page 11
P & Z Minutes
February 13, 1986
PZ 86-2
DENIED
10. PZ 86-3
(
(
Mr. Royston stated this business is
allowed without this specific use. He
said when they come in for a
certificate of occupancy, if it meets
the criteria, it would be allowed.
Vice Chairman Wood stated that some
uses would require more parking spaces
than others. He said he felt they
would be doing an injustice in
rezoning this to a specific use which
would cause more traffic than they
could handle.
Mr. SChwinger made the motion to deny
PZ 86-2 because it would not serve the
best interest of the area. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford
and the motion for denial carried 4-0.
Request of J. T. Concepts Texas
Beverage Company to rezone part
3R, Block 2, Snow Heights North
Addition, from its present
classification of C-l to C- Specific
Use-Sale of Alcoholic Bev. ages. This
property is located on he north side
of Northeast Loop 8 Service Road,
east of Rufe Snow rive.
opened the Public
called for those wishing
favor of this request to
forward.
eal Cukerbaum with Cambridge
Companies came forward. He said they
plan to sell this property for a J. T.
McCord restaurant. He said it would
be located west of Walmart and east of
the Gulf Carwash. Mr. Cukerbaum said
the restaurant would be 5000 to 6000
square feet with a small bar. He
showed pictures of some J. T. McCord
restaurants in the area and a floor
plan. Mr. Cukerbaum said the bar
would only be 6% of the building and
would sell only 25% to 30% alcoholic
beverages. He said it was their
policy to not sell to anyone under the
age of 25 years.
I
I
,_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
.' /
(
-t
r
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSUL TING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
January 20, 1986
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 86-2 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM LR TO LR-5U
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 132
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
£¡dALWr C2tL
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
Zoning Review
PZ 86-2
1
Page
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
~
~
¡í /i1¡ I
. , ~
' ,
. ,
;' "
I"
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
February 11, 1986
City of North Richland Hills
Zoning Commission
7301 NE Loop 820
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
RE:
City of North Richland Hills
Addition: Richland Terrace
Block 4 Lot SR
Zoned local retail
Dear Sirs;
This is in petition against the rezoning of Block 4 Lot SR
of the Richland Terrace Addition, for the buying and selling
of alcoholic beverages for public consumption.
NAME
ADDRESS
'1/ tJ 5
~
5£/ ~ r¡
L~/J<-
, 7 /
'7L£
. .. \
~
, /it1'I1ÞJ
I' ,
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie '
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
--
NAME
ADDRESS
~ðI4i~'Y1 ~ ~
j'~
5~d3 Qe~
IJ~
-
I'
pz
gb-2
~'"
,,~
tv"l
Y
p-~
Ù'}
,
/'¿o~ ~
....., -
...,¿y~ °c ~
o
'\.--
...J' ~..
~ "'0.
+", ~
~ ~1-
.,<><¡-
.ý
I
I
I
1
DESCRIPTION OF PHOPEHrry SURVEYED
BEING a portion of Lot 5-P, Block 4, RICHLAND TERRACE
ADDITION to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant
County, Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume
388-10, Page 77, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas,
des~ribed as follows:
BEGINNING at a point for corner lc)cated South 62 degrees
27m i n II t c s r~ a s t 2 6 . 0 fee tan d SOU t h 2 7 de 9 r e e s 33m i nut e s,
West 19.5 feet fro~ the Northwest corner of said Lot 5-R,
Block 4;
HENCE South 88 degrees 48 minutes 38 seconds East 36.0
feet to a point for corner;
THENCE SOllth 1 degree 11 n1inutes 22 seconcls v.]est 34. 0
feet to a point for corner;
TIIENCE North 88 degrees 48 minutes 38 seconds West
36.0 feet to a point for corner;
Tl-IENCE North 1 degree 11 minutes 22 seconds East 34. 0 feet
to the place of beginning and containing 1224.00 square feet,
1
I
I
SCALE 1": 30'
NO ENCROACHMENTS OTHER THAN SHOWN
_6.
., fL OF ~~..
. ...~~~.. '" ...~
þ~~.. , ....~.$',
'* .- . .. ". .'
....,. ...................,
. L. OT D 8 n A ~ SO ~1
".. ...................... ..,
'..0'. 953 .:.f
~ '. ., ". .' 0
.(!J/..~'.,,~..~..t.; f
~~!..C· ·SÜ~'þ·
'..
LEGEND
LOYD BRANSOM. SURVEYORS INC.
REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR
1028 NORTH SYLVANIA AVE.
FT. WORTH 1 TEXAS 76111
834-3477
. RO~ PIN
o iRON P1PE
~ 80'S O'ARC STAKE
o CONCRETE:- MON
-X-X- FENCE
8' -- .5 ~
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ¡ S TRUE
& CORRECT AS SURVEYED ON TH~
~~--þ~
DATE 1- /¢ -pc,
-II-fl- POWER LINE
-T-T- TELEPHONE LINE
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1352
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-2 the following described property shall be
rezoned from LR to LR-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise
consumption.
BEING a portion of Lot 5R, Block 4, Richland Terrace Addition to the City
of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to plat recorded
in Volume 388-10, Page 77, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, described
as follows:
BEGINNING at a point for corner located South 62 degrees 27 minutes East
26.0 feet and South 27 degrees 33 minutes West 19.5 feet from the Northwest
corner of said Lot 5R, Block 4;
THENCE South 88 degrees 48 minutes 38 seconds East 36.0 feet to a point for
corner;
THENCE South 1 degree 11 minutes 22 seconds West 34.0 feet to a point for
corner;
THENCE North 88 degrees 48 minutes 38 seconds West 36.0 feet to a point for
corner;
THENCE North 1 degree 11 minutes 22 seconds East 34.0 feet to the place of
beginning and containing 1224.00 square feet.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
-
'... .
Page 2
This property is located at 7651 Northeast Loop 820, Suite D.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF FEBRUARY,
1986.
CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SECRETARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-86-2 IS HEREBY REZONED LR-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF PREMISE
CONSUMPTION THIS 24th DAY OF MARCH, 1986.
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
¿;z~- ~
~ ( ~. /k~ ¡¿~ ?AI/~
Depart ent Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
-
I;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
, ..
.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
Department:
3/24/86
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: PZ ,86-3
Subject:
Request of J.T. Concepts, Texas Beverage Company
to Rezone Part of Lot 3R, Block 2, Snow Heights
North from C-l to C-l -SUe
Ordinance No. 1353
This Zoning Application is presented on a tract in the existing commercial center
located on the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and N.E. Loop 820. The requested
rezoning is from C-l Commercial to C-l SU Commercial Specific Use-sale of Alcoholic
Beverages. The applicant, J. T. Concepts, is purchasing the subject tract in order to
develop a J. T. McCord's Restaurant on the site. The applicants wish to sell alcoholic
beverages with their food service at the proposed restaurant.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-2
requesting rezoning from C-l to C-l SU on a portion of Tract 3R, Block 2, Snow Heights
North Addition be approved.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
, Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
r=a
I
I
1-2
1194
I
I
Ie
I
1-2
u
I
I-~-=- '
~
II ,Ý 4
Ie
II
I
II
I
I
II
I
Ie
I
I
I
II
I
I
~
I
I
Page 11 ~
p & Z Minutes
February 13, 1986
10. PZ 86-3
(
Mr. Royston stated this busine is
allowed without this speci· use. He
said when they come in r a
certificate of occ ncy, if it meets
the criteria, would be allowed.
C rman Wood stated that some
would require more parking spaces
han others. He said he felt they
would be doing an injustice in
rezoning this to a specific use which
would cause more traffic than they
could handle.
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to deny
PZ 86-2 because it would not serve the
best interest of the area. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford
and the motion for denial carried 4-0.
Request of J. T. Concepts Texas
Beverage Company to rezone part of Lot
3R, Block 2, Snow Heights North
Addition, from its present
classification of C-l to C-I-Specific
Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. This
property is located on the north side
of Northeast Loop 820 Service Road,
east of Rufe Snow Drive.
Vice Chairman Wood opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
:please come forward.
Neal Cukerbaum with Cambridge
Companies came forward. He said they
plan to sell this property for a J. T.
McCord restaurant. He said it would
be located west of Walmart and east of
the Gulf Carwash. Mr. Cukerbaum said
the restaurant would be 5000 to 6000
square feet with a small bar. He
showed pictures of some J. T. McCord
restaurants in the area and a floor
plan. Mr. Cukerbaum said the bar
would only be 6% of the building and
would sell only 25% to 30% alcoholic
beverages. He said it was their
policy to not sell to anyone under the
age of 25 years.
I "
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Page 12
P & Z Minutes
February 13, 1986
(
PZ 86-3
APPROVED
11. PZ 86-4
(
Vice Chairman Wood called for those
Wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Vice Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve
PZ 86-3. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Hallford and the motion carried
4-0.
Request of Frank Lynch to rezone Tract
5, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract
1266, from its present classificat' n
of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Sin e
Family). This property is 10 ted on
the north side of Green Val y Drive
between Davis Boulevard a Green
Valley Raceway.
Vice Chairman Wood pened the Public
Hearing and ca1 ä for those wishing
to speak in f or of this request to
please Corne orward.
Lydia nnally with Teague NaIl and
Perk's, Inc. came forward. She said
th had changed their request to R-2,
s requested, so there would be a
mixed uSe öf residential. She said
,there would be 17 acres with access
from Green Valley Drive.
Vice Chairman Wood called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Vice Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approve PZ 86-4. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Hallford and the
motion carried 4-0.
I' "
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
(.)
KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
January 29, 1986
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 86-3 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM C-1 TO C-1-SU
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 121
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
W/~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
Zoning Review
PZ 86-3
Page
1
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I'
..
I
..' , ~ ·::\'·;.:.~:t~: ".
. ~
.. -0. _... .:. '~.....
:;: ;. :-;.~ .-',' :;.!
. .
.:!. ~
.; "
i' .
. : ..-
:'.J' :'
: ... .
1
. .
.;
. : .;..~ ~ ..
\
,
, \
\.
'.,
: ',3:
. n ..
'0
'~ ~
,: >
r-
o
,,;
," ~
. "
. -
, \
; ,
. .
.:. i
r'
, 'J ~':- ';:'.~;/.
; ,
"
--~, :...,
~ 'b .:
':P
·0
.~
.~
.Ø\
..;
'. 4
1_·-
f' "
.. "".;..
.~ 4.:.·· . .,
': :".
,J\;.'::~;:~:: 'm :. ..:,:
::.~. .' :~:""
'\ " ,
'f, .'
~ ~ :;:. :'.'. '
. '. ..
0-.:. ~ ".,: 0, "...:
~, ..~ ..' ..
~1i:r:::l:~ ' .
~': :
, :)":::.'
.', " .
" '
. r"'¡" i=: t?._
: '= ~ ;: ~ ::
:::::. :
. ~... . ~ i.
"j'
'!II
.- ~":
i;~,?¡{~ ~ ": ~),::
-:'.; i
/ft¡r J:::;;
~ ~~ ~~:6V ~t~~~~I:}'
11 · Q .., '''', I' ~. '., '"
.LO·~ ~ , . <l ;';;;:',,' ~~, ,~.;. :~.:~i::~. ;.:·i~. .
,'.. ..." '.' t "'"'
.: '~. '. ";¡t~~i::,~'-
i .
eo; :~'.
,. ,
: '/:/ ::: :r~~~~ wk f¡·~'::~~;'
"... "' I '~.." ,,:...,. ....... " . '.. .
} ~ " . .. t... ", , : '
~~{ ~i(;) ,','
;!I r: » ,
~t'l -
~cf ,.
:. ~,
s 00 20' 38- W ~20.08'
.. I.
. ,
".. -..
.;. '. :,~ 1.
" .
'Q]t
~' .
>.
,...
I
~
>
:u . .
-i
. .'
I'
, .
. .
~~"'" ,,'
. .',.
I' ,
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
te
ORDINANCE NO. 1353
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-3 the following described property shall be
rezoned from C-l to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Alcoholic Beverages.
BEING a 1.54 acre tract of land out of Lot 3R, Block 2, Snow Heights North
Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas as recorded in Volume
388-17, Page 62 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a 1/2 inch iron rod found at the Southeast corner of said Lot
3R;
THENCE South 89 degrees 51 minutes 41 seconds West 270.00 feet with the
north right-of-way line of Interstate Highway Loop 820 and the south line
of said Lot 3R to a point for corner;
THENCE North 00 degrees 48 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 170.00
feet to a point for corner;
THENCE NOrth 66 degrees 03 minutes 21 seconds East a distance of 49.54 feet
to a point for corner;
THENCE North 89 degrees 51 minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 105.00
feet to a point for corner;
THENCE North 00 degrees 48 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 107.53
feet to a point for corner on the north line of said Lot 3R and the south
line of a TESCO transmission R.O.W.; Thence North 66 degrees 27 minutes 00
seconds East with said north line of Lot 3R a distance of 108.05 feet to a
1/2 inch iron rod found at the northeast corner of Lot 3R;
THENCE South 23 degrees 24 minutes 43 seconds East with the east line of
said Lot 3R a distance of 69.69 feet to a found "X" cut in a concrete curb,
same being the point of curvature of a curve to the right whose central
angle is 23 degrees 44 minutes 23 seconds and whose radius is 106.04 feet;
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
..~
Page 2
THENCE with said curve to the right along the east line of said Lot 3R an
arc distance of 43.93 feet to a found 1/2 inch iron rod at its point of
tangency;
THENCE South 00 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds West with the east line of
said Lot 3R a distance of 13.79 feet to a found "X" cut in a concrete curb;
THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds West with the east line of
said Lot 3R a distance of 18.00 feet to a found 1/2 inch iron rod for
corner;
THENCE South 00 degrees 24 minutes 18 seconds West with the east line of
said Lot 3R a distance of 220.07 feet to the place of beginning and
containing 66,943 square feet or 1.54 acres of land, more or less.
This property is located on the north side of Northeast Loop 820 Service
Road, east of Rufe Snow Drive.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF FEBRUARY,
1986.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-86-3 IS HEREBY REZONED C-I-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES THIS
24th DAY OF MARCH, 1986.
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ATTEST:
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
I c\.
.:. .~ r
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
Department:
3/24/86
Council Meeting Date:
SUbject:
Request of Frank Lynch to Rezone Tract 5, Agenda Number: PZ 86-4
S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from AG to R-2.
Ordinance No. 1354
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This Zoning Application is presented on the vacant tract of land located on the north
side of Green Valley Drive west of Davis Boulevard. The requested rezoning is from AG
Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential. The tract of land involved was earlier
considered for R-3 Zoning and was denied by the City Council. The applicants have
resubmitted the request at this time for the R-2 Zoning in light of the City Council
action.
The Staff noted that the location of the subject tract requires that Bursey Road as a
four lane Collector Street be extended through the property.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-4
requesting rezoning on Tract 5, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266 from AG to R-2 be
approved.
I
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
,'"
,- K1!1L~
Depar ent Head Signature , City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. Finance Director
PaQe 1 of 1
I
'-
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
R-2
1195
AG
R-3
1203
0-1
1205
0-1
1220
I '-..
At
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
Page 12
P & Z Minutes
February 13, 1986
(
(
Vice Chairman Wood call or those
wishing to speak pposition to this
request to se come forward.
e being no one wishing to speak,
the Vice Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve
PZ 86-3. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Hallford and the motion carried
4-0.
11. PZ 86-4
Request of Frank Lynch to rezone Tract
5, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract
1266, from its present classification
of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single
Family). This property is located on
the north side of Green Valley Drive
between Davis Boulevard and Green
Valley Raceway.
Vice Chairman Wood opened the Public
Hearing and called for those wishing
to speak in favor of this request to
please come forward.
Lydia Connally with Teague NaIl and
Perkins, Inc. came forward. She said
they had changed their request to R-2,
as requested, so there would be a
mixed use of residential. She said
,there would be 17 acres with access
from Green Valley Drive.
Vice Chairman Wood called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please come forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Vice Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
PZ 86-4
APPROVED
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approve PZ 86-4. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Hallford and the
motion carried 4-0.
I'
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
'> l
('
.-I
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
January 20, 1986
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ZONING CASE PZ 86-4 REVIEW LETTER,
ZONING FROM AG TO R-2
REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 43
We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and
find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning
Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both
the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council.
~aM- (j)
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
Zoning Review
PZ 86-4
Page
1
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283.6211 . METRO/267.3367
I "
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
~
ORDINANCE NO. 1354
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING
ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984
AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION
IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-4 the following described property shall be
rezoned from AG to R-2.
BEING a tract of land out of the Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266,
Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and
bounds as follows:
COMMENCING at a 1 inch iron rod found being the southwest corner of Tract
A, Cherokee Estates, an Addition to the City of North Richland Hills,
Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-68, Page 19, Tarrant County Plat Records;
THENCE South 00 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds East for a distance of 399.22
feet to the true point of beginning;
THENCE South 61 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds East for a distance of 175.0
feet to a point;
THENCE South 28 degrees 53 minutes 22 seconds West for a distance of 8.61
feet to a point, said point being the beginning of a curve to the left with
a radius of 194.40 feet and a central angle of 28 degrees 50 minutes 57
seconds and whose chord bears South 14 degrees 27 minutes 53 seconds West
for a distance of 96.85 feet;
THENCE along said curve a distance of 97.88 feet to a point;
THENCE South 00 degrees 02 minutes 26 seconds West for a distance of 89.44
feet to a point, said point being the beginning of a curve to the right
with a radius of 273.14 feet and a central angle of 28 degrees 44 minutes
57 seconds and whose chord bears South 75 degrees 35 minutes 06 seconds
East for a distance of 135.62 feet;
THENCE along said curve a distance of 137.05 feet to a point;
THENCE South 00 degrees 34 minutes 40 seconds East for a distance of 745.91
feet to a point;
I ," ~
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
.
Page 2
THENCE South 89 degrees 51 minutes 35 seconds East for a distance of 27.0
feet to a point;
THENCE South 07 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 319.44
feet to a point, said point being on a curve to the right with a radius of
800.0 feet and a central angle of 19 degrees 30 minutes 18 seconds and
whose chord bears South 74 degrees 36 minutes 18 seconds East for a
distance of 271.03 feet;
THENCE along said curve to the right a distance of 272.34 feet to a point;
THENCE South 25 degrees 08 minutes 52 seconds West for a distance of 34.0
feet to a point;
THENCE South for a distance of 778.58 feet to a point;
THENCE North 89 degrees 15 minutes 12 seconds West for a distance of 500.0
feet to a point;
THENCE North 00 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds East for a distance of
2246.83 feet to the point of beginning and containing 17.2543 acres
(751,599 square feet) of land, more or less.
This property is located on the north side of Green Valley Drive between
Davis Boulevard and Green Valley Raceway.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 13th DAY OF FEBRUARY,
1986.
~~
~~ .~~~CHA PLANNING AND
sq~ PLANN~ ~'~""~mfuÍSSION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO.
PZ-86-4 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 24th DAY OF MARCH, 1986.
ATTEST:
MAYOR
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
ATTORNEY
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
I Department:
.ubject:
I
Administration
Request for an Appeal Hearing on PZ 86-5
3/24/86
- Council Meeting Date:
PZ 86-5
Agenda Number:
If Council grants the request for an appeal hearing, the hearing can be heard April 28,
1986.
Recommendation:
Set date for hearing.
Finance Review
Source of Funds: Accl. Number
Bonds (GO/Rev.) Sufficient Funds Available
_ Operating Budget
_ Other
r} .;~ ~..') ¡Ç7 tf A ~~
\..., ,...¿ á J..;..(J ~ 0 <- {, -<-<-<1-- b- fll oZ,A
¿,' Department Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Fmance Director
-
Paae 1 of
1
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
Council Meeting Date: 3/24/86
Agenda Number: PS 85-99
Request of H & S Partnership for Final Plat
of Royal Court Addition.
~
This Final Plat Application is presented for consideration of Royal Court Addition. The
property involved is located on the east side of Glenview Drive north of Diamond Loch
Addition. The purpose for the proposed plat is to subdivide the tract into single
family lots in conformance with the R-l Zoning District.
The Staff had noted to the Commission that this same plat was submitted earlier for
action. At that time the Commission had made two stipulations regarding the final plat.
(1) The Drainage design submitted with the plat must meet the criteria of the
Subdivision Ordinance. (2) The building set-back line shown on Glenview Drive be
a minimum of 20 feet as required by the Zoning Ordinance. The current revision of the
plat meets all the criteria of the Ordinance including the two stipulations.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Final Plat of Royal Court Addition as
submitted.
_
,
,
Finance Review
I
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_Operating Budget _
~ (nk:e
- epart t Head Signature I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. Finance Director
-
Paae 1 of _ ~__
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
R"7-MF
0:
o
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Page 2
P & Z Minutes
March 13, 1986
PS 85-98
APPROVED
3.
PS 85-99
PS 85-99
APPROVED
-----
(
(
Mr. Stewart requested that the
Commission allow him to get with
partners of the property and se
they can work something out. e
he could not answer it now.
Chairman Bowen stated t Commission
also realizes there a some drainage
problems which will ave to be worked
out prior to subm· ting the final
plat.
Mr. Wood sa he would prefer to see a
stipulati that the houses would have
to be 2 0 square feet on the plat.
tewart said he did not feel this
but he could put it on
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approve PS 85-98 with the following
stipulations: 1. Add the description
of 2300 square feet houses to the
front of the plat and on the official
zoning map of the City of North
Richland Hills; 2. That the City
Staff and developer's engineers
schedule a field survey to resolve the
drainage problems existing at the
western boundary of this subdivision
and a detailed engineer's design
submitted to the City Engineer for
approval. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood with this added stipulation:
that the entrance be moved to the
north boundary and there will be no
common property. This motion carried
3-1 with Ms. Nash voting against.
Request of H & S Partnership for
consideration of the revised final
plat of Royal Court Addition.
Mr. Wood made the motion to approve
PS 85-99. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried
4-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
1
I
I
Ie
I
I
(
(,--
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
March 4, 1986
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-814, CITY OF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS
ROYAL COURT ADDITION,
LOTS 1 THRU 12, BLOCK 1,
DRAINAGE PLAr~,
PS 85 - 99, GRID MAP 137
As requested, we have reviewed the referenced subdivision drainage plan and
offer the following comments:
1 We have no objection to the proposed concrete flume which is to be
constructed within a la-foot drainage easement. We would note, however,
that due to the depth of cuts required to achieve the optimum flowline
slope, erosion protection outside the limits of the drainage easement will
probably be required, such as railroad ties, etc. Shoring of the existing
fence along the south side of the drainage easement méY also be required
due to the deep cuts.
2 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
~MW
RICHARD ~I. ALBIN, P. E .
"
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3361
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
(
JOHN E. LEVITT ENGINEERS, INC.
ENGINEERS · PLANNERS
3921 VANCE ROAD · FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118
.
284-098 I
February 25, 1985
Mrs. Wanda Calvert
Planning and Zoning Coordinator
City of North Rich1and Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Lots 1 to 12, Block 1
ROYAL COURT ADDITION
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
We are transmitting two (2) sets of the revised engineering plans for the
referenced project in accordance with the recommendations contained in the City
Engineer's letter dated February 19, 1986.
I spoke with Mr. Albin by telephone last week and discussed our proposed
resolution to the drainage swale problem. He indicated that he was in
concurrance with our proposed solution, i.e. concrete swale with an
accompanying reduction in the required easement width.
Would you please forward these to his office for review. Should these meet
with his satisfaction, we are respectfully requesting to be placed on the
earliest possible City Council agenda.
Should you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
JOHN E. LEVITT ENGINEERS, INC.
s.
cc Mr. John L. Hawkins
Mayor Dan Echols
Mr. Roger Line
Mr. Richard Albin
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
(
(
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
February 19, 1986
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-814, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ROYAL COURT ADDITION,
LOTS 1 THRU 12, BLOCK 1,
DRAINAGE PLAN,
PS 85 - 99, GRID MAP 137
As requested, we have reviewed the referenced subdivision drainage plan and
offer the following comments:
1 The limits of the offsite drainage area delineated by the developer1s
engineer are not correct. See attached Figure No. 1 which shows the
off-site drainage area, prepared by the developer1s engineer, which was
drawn on an aDO-scale N.C.T.C.O.G. contour map. Most of the off-site area
shown on this map covers an area not developed at the time the contour map
was drawn. Subsequent development has changed the topographic contours
thus changing the off-site drainage area limits. Also the off-site
drainage area limits are based on lO-foot contour intervals which is not
very accurate. The total off-site drainage area based on this map is
about 18 acres. Figure No.2 shows the off-site drainge area map which we
have prepared from the City1s 20Q-scale, 2-foot contour, topo maps. The
limits of the off-site drainage area at each street intersection were
verified in the field. The off-site area which we compute totals about
34.9 acres, which is almost twice the size of the developer1s engineer1s
off-site area.
2 The design discharge for the overland drainage swale, which the developer
is proposing to leave unlined, totals 38.7 cfs for the IOO-year storm (not
including the portion of the IOO-year discharge carried underground in the
existing 3D-inch storm drain) based on the 18 acres off-site area. The
required capacity of the swale based on the 34.9 acre off-site area totals
about 105 csf, (see attached computer printouts). The channel top width
required for an earthen channel based on the 105 cfs discharge is about 24
feet, which exceeds the proposed 2D-foot drainage easement width. A
concrete lined channel designed to carry the 105 cfs discharge would
measure about 13 feet at the top. As shown on the attached Figure No.3,
the Subdivision Ordinance requires that the overland relief swale be
concrete lined or lined with other materials approved by the Public Works
Department. As shown on Figure No.4, an additional 40 feet of easement
width is required if an earthen channel is approved for maintenance
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 .. METRO/267-3367
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Subdivision Review ~cter continued
(
ROYAL COURT ADDITION
access, or the developer shall provide a concrete channel access ramp for
Public Works maintenance with no additional easement width required. If
an earthen channel is approved, a concrete pilot is still required by
Subdivision Ordinance.
3 We would note that the drainage channel calculations are based on the
minimum flowline slope provided by the developer1s engineer. An increased
flowline slope would reduce the channel size requirements for both earthen
and concrete sections.
4 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
February 19, 1986
PS 85 - 99
PAGE
2
; I. ·
Ie
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie.
I
I
,
(
(
,
,
NO"TE: This tributary area of 1 8 acre~
has been used as the basis fo
design of the overflow swale ~
the south property Une.
OFF-SITE DRAINAGE MAP
&:>G.~LE.- I"::. 600'
F'~U1ZE NO,
PREPAe E?""V 6'/
ËN ~ INEE".g ,
,
~ I
DE. \J' LD fE:r¿..5
HYDRAULIC DATA
. ~^^ U~ ,,~"'" n ,,,n vn
\
~,~
I~\ ,'~ 0 -:
i ;
'---.J
< "
-~
- .
I :
I
I
I
r--------__.,
I I I
I
I
; I I
¡,·t /
, I
I
I \ I
, ~ \
\ \
\ \
\ ~/
--< "
---- "
.
.
.
~
DO' [
o
1O
"', ',,1>,/, "..,-
--.------
'>~ÀX \//0 ,0 ,C
\ ,
--," " \ ~
. _.:..----
~
[
,. f)...,
~. '="
./
./
. x~-,-~'
"
-
!t_
" '"
,'- "
:,' c~'n ;
-, - ~-, ~t_C:J: ,
-. . 7 3 ~- ."",--- --. ""
"'< ,', .. -.:::_- ,~
~21 x ~ "" '" '-J......
~~ ~-- """'--~
I f ~ ~
:-- 0
I
. '1 y
¡ .".- -
i-
f ~ V
~f-'- -
:¡
~t)( Q Q.
" Q <3
..,
! -- l)l
-"
" ~
..........
I
I
/
/
,,", - 'f~
,/ ~ i ~ -
:/, '.-, ~~§:v'
, ~ ~ ~ :' - _ ^ . ' r.u,_~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
BUILDING SETBACK WIDTH
(
HOUSE
IMPROVED IOO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN (MAX. SPREAD)
STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
HOUSE
25-YEAR FLOOD PLA IN (MAX. SPREAD)
--~---....2..-___
1.5' MIN.
2S-YEAR WATER SURFACE
MINIMUM 5-YEAR DESIGN
OVERSIZE AS REQUIRED
(10, 25, 50, 15-YEAR) TO
~IHTAIN 25 AND JOO-YEAR
SPRE~D liMITS SHOWN ABOVE
UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN CONDUIT
STORM DRAIN IN STREET
25-YEAR WATER SURFACE
(HOT MAJOR WATERCOURSE)
~
I
,
I
I
I
,
1.5' MIN., SL--
\..O~;-;~F\ - ~
PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT
i
I
,
I
IMPROVED lOO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN liMITS
STREET
IOO-YEAR WATER SURFACE
OVERLAND RELIEF
SWALE -- II HE WITH
CONCRETE OR OTHER
~TERIAl APPROVED
BY PUBLIC WORkS DEPT.
UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN CONDUIT
OVERSIZE AS REQUIRED
(JO, 25, 50, 15-YEAR) TO
~ I NTA IN 100- YEAR FLOOD
PLAIN LIMITS WITHIN EASEMENT
(~Y REPLACE PIPE WITH CONCRETE
CHANNEL IF GREATER THAN OR EQUAL
TO 60-INCH DIA.)
STORM DRAIN IN EASEMENT
3
FIGURE .rl
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
(
EX ISTING lOO-YEAR FLOOD PLA IN
HOUSE
MINItU4 EASEMENT WIDTH IF ACCESS RAMP
" TO CHANNEL BOTTOM IS PROY IOED
(INCREASE EASE~NT ~FEET IF RAMP
NOT PROYIDED)
IMPROVED lOO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
¡EXISTING IOO-YEAR
WATER SURFACE
-------
1 FT.." t--FENCE HOUSE
1.5' MIN. ,: L
ïMPROVÈDI OO":ŸE:;- r t
WA TER SURFACE 7
EXISTING CHANNEL
SECTION BEFORE
IMPROVEMENTS
LEVEE
ROPOSED CONCRETE
CHA NNEl II NER
PONDING
BEHIND
LEVEE
( loo-YEAR)
FULL IOO-YEAR CONCRETE CHANNEL LINER
-'
IMPROVED IOO-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
(ADD ~FEET FOR EA~EMENT WIDTH)
EXISTING loo-YEAR {'MPROVED IOO-YEAR
~ATER ':R':Eì~ ,:~u~C~_
I~MI" J. 5' MIN.
· r ~---;~~ATER---¡-;~-T
I:JJ¡ _S~CE (~ST)~ .L
PROPOSED CONCRETE CHANNEL
LINER (EXTEND LINER TO
NATURAL GROUND-25 YEAR MIN.
CAPACITY REQUIRED)
PARTIAL IOO-YEAR CONCRETE CHANNEL LINER
.....
PROPOSED
EARTHEN CHANNEL
IMPROVED JOO-YEAR FLOOD PLA IN
(ADD ~FEET FOR EASEMENT WIDTH)
--7-------2...--
EXISTING
lOO-YEAR PilOT 1.5! MIN.
WA TER SURFACE CHANNEL I
r
EXCAVAT IO~
IMPROVED IOO-YEAR
WATER SURFACE
- -2-.
EARTHEN CHANNEL WITH .cONCRETE PILOT
~~
4-
FIGURE ~
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I~
([
z
I~
IJJ
I-
I~
c
If
-J
I~
I
il
I
I
I
II:t"
era
Ii
I~
( )
lê
U)
:u
<J:Z
u....
(t1iW
1-;:>
:::t<I
.J
CQ(1:
::1.1-
[1)0
I....
I
!
¡
(t'J:
WI-
Cl:O
([:CQ
i
I
I
. I
!
I
tn;
..... i
c:
,
I
I
I
0([
t-¡....
,( )
I
I
1:'([
01-
a:[J')
u..
IJJU
:E:¡Z
....,0
I-,U
-J
'(1:
([....
(.J'C
:....
100
CSLL
iU
i
[
I
iZ
LL.;IJJ
Q:.; ....
¡z
, ¡ ....
If')
~
.1
10;
II
II
II
II
"
II
II
If I
II
II I!
"
II
II /1
II
U ,..
II ~II
II ,~
II~
II i
" I
II lJ)i
II
..
II
II
II
II
"
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
"
II
II
II
n
II
II
"
II
II
II
II
II
"
If
II
II
If
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
"
..
II
II
"
II
II
II
If
II
"
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
"
II
"
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
"
II
II
II
II
II
It):
o
.
In;
0-;
!
01
0:
. ¡
If);
.... I
!
M
q-:
.
"
....;
¡
¡
M'
q-¡
.'
",
....¡
o
tn.
.
o
~¡
CD;
.¡.;
M~
¡
¡
ì
~:
m;
.:
q-~
M!
1
i
01
01
.!
0:
OJ
"I
I
0;
~¡
0:
¡
j
0:
o
.
o
0;
,,;
i
j
o
U)W 0
en':I: .
ouo
..J.
c:>
:r:,
:[!,1
:Lù
cn:CQ 0
tI)'QS 0
0; I .
....J,Q 0
c:z
:t:.lLJ
¡at
I
¡
to! aN
U)=C N
0: <I .
....J: cc: q-
C:ŒJ .....
:I:!
¡
(
¡MN"-o-
¡ q- M (" It)
: 0 0 If) (''\I
¡"MNo-.
:MNMCD
W'1f) M ....'0
>-: II"') 0..,0 0 010
I-¡ q- 0, . . .1 .
....1 - -J:O 0 010
U¡... M U)' I
o ¡:::J.... I t
-110 I
W' I
:>1 ! ~ 0 ~¡ en
i i M 0 q-: CD
-J: . . .: _
00 IJ.J I 0"- ~ .... ¡ 0"-
· · '" :>:...c ..... .... !
:> ; en .
UJ: .0
-110 t()
Wi If)
!
I
,
i..... q- oj N
¡ ~ 0- Mi--o
([, . . .: .
o W' q- It) CD: 0"-
: 0 cc:¡ ¡
.' . . ([;
:>1 (I) 10 '
~f:5~
L&J ¡ I.LJ I
í N,O M D""~N
o I ....., M M M, c:t"
o 00: ¡
~~: g i I
o ....;. .
· u' 0 j
~ :r~ j
ur ¡
Z:>: '
u '
i
>; q-
1-' If")
..... I en .
UlL.f'.
<t:u 0
"- I ....
<r:
U¡
0:::
LLJ "
I- 0
W ([I .
!: . W I.L.. I"-
<J: Q:::'(t)
....<I
Q
:J:
U
Z M
t-oC , .....
~wl g
0..: N
0: 0
I..J: .
00; 0
9""'f i a::: U) ~
j LLJ Wi
Z¡ .... N¡
t!'I: W ~I
....: 1: ~ (I)'
wi <t M !
W· ..... W!
Q'Q 1-,'
I <I:
z¡
, CI:: Q:I
I L&J uJ
.:.... '" f-I
Q:. LLI M -J¡I
O:!: .([
L&J(['I:t'
:c......M
I-;C
¡
I
~
a
~ !~
~l~
f\J
¡
~~ ~
~
~
t\) /, ,
,
~~
~R
\:::~
V\I
~!
~¡
I
, J
I
¡
-J
<I:
<I:t-
uc
I-
U
<I:Z
Ut-4
(DUJ
I- :>.
::t<I:
-l
"'<I:
::II-
eno
t-
([J:
UJI-
0:0
([tr¡
m
t-4
Q
O<t
1-1-
( )
J:([
01-
Ct:OO
ILL
en
(31J...
u
Z
LLLIJ
0::1-
Z
t-4
1J.IU
:E:Z
....0
I-U
o
o
.
o
~
o
o
.
o
o
"
o
o
.
o
~
""
"-
CD
.
an
P4
o
N
.
D'
P4
'"
'"
P4
o
If")
.
o
o
'I:t'
.'
m
M
~
If)
.
M
~
~
.
N
CD
P4
D'
~
.
0--
I
¡
UJ .....!
UJ Q 0-:
o ([ .: i
..J CI:: 0: i
'CU,1 ; ~M('~M
: z ;... q-: co ..l)
! ~~,~~
',' tIJ (~ --0 ....
UJq-M........
>- O"-j Q. 0 0: 0 0
I- ~i CJ · .¡ . .
.... .; ..J 0 O. 0 0
U I- --0: U)
C ::J ....¡ !
..J c! /
~ '..0 M! 0-. q-
r CI' 0'; ~ CD
..J . . . .
--o! W .... 00' q- N
· · 1I:::t,:> (\-~ .... .... .....
:>(.1) · i
~ Q~; I
I.1J If) ,
¡ ONf'-.CI'
i M...o. 10 ....
! <I: . ., . _
,,: Lú CD 0--: ('~ q-
M c.c: ¡ .... ....
. . . ([ ¡
:> to~' ¡
. Lù .~. I
j ..J ::I Ifl
:LaJ ¡l1J
! ;NO'-NCC.....
o : .... M ~; ':t IJ1
0' : tr) ¡
M > 1J1!
....' I- q-¡
0: ..... .i
.: U M
0, 0 Z ......
I r ...J..... ¡
~ Lú !
z:>
LJ
I> 0-.
¡ I- 0-'
! ..... U) .)
, U 1L. q-1
([ U o-!:
! 0... ....,
; ([
it.) ,
tr ¡
L&J q.-:
....' 0:
W <t ..
1:: Lù LL. ....,
¢Ct:oo....
.....<J:
c I
:D
~ no'
..... CD,
In ~:
q-! W N'
I CL. (''\I I
10 0
., ..J .1
[J) ~I
...~ c::: _/1 tf)
. UJ W
I Z t- N
t!:1 Wi......
¡ ..... 1: If) tD
" U) ([ -=;r¡
LLJ..... I IJJ
Q Q , l-
I 1([
cc: ~
I .~..o~
!Q:WID..J
¡O:E: -(t
¡L&J([~
I ~ ë I
!(
II
II
II
II
II
"/
I
N'
: r.n [!:J q-,
¡ tn X .
!Ou....
j...J a ,
I C:> !
:I:
CD
1r.n~O
I ( ) c:s 0
. 0 I .
...J Q 0:
QZ
j ::I: lLJ
, t.Q
~
I
II
II
"
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
n
II
II
II
II
II
o
c
,
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
!
!
i
1
I
i
I
! ~
~~
~ ~
R
~
J. ~II
~
~
\!\ ~I
j ,~¡
, ,/
.. 'i
~ ~¡
Y\ ,~i
~ ~I
~ ~I
r I
~
:\J
i\n
~~
:,
,
~
~
~
:~
'~
II
: '.
'J\
~
¡
: I
~
ff'.
~'---
!\.-u
¡~
~
:~
!
¡~
::(
II
¡
: .
j~
¡q:
i\J
;~\
:U
V)
V
i
,
~~
~
¡~
;'.u
~
I
¡~
i'-U
i<.
:<
:~
~
f'j
j
¡~
;'~
;,
!~
ilu
f<
t
i
I
!~
~
I",
~
~
r.s
~
¡
;
I
¡
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I~
z
.....
I~
l1J
I-
......
I~
If
...J
<I
I~
I
I
I
I
Iv
a:a
"
I~
%:
I~
...J
,<1:
<1:,)-
uo
'....
U
<I:Z
(JÞ-I
(!ILJJ
f-:>
3<1:
¡
....J
CQ([
:JI-
ene
.....
<I::r
WI-
0::0
<t,~
I
¡
ui
1
I
c:J<t
t-¡I-
1m
t
I
~<I
Ot-
Q:m
LL
¡
í
I
:(1)
GLL.
,U
;
:z
lJ..:lLJ
0::1-
¡Z
1Þ-4
I
LUU
EZ
Þ-4,Q
I-:U
o
o
.
In
.....
M
q-
.
I"-
....
M
q-;
.
I""'-
....
o
If)
.
o
~
CD
.
~
M'
--0
m
.
q-
M
0;
0:
.:
o·
R!
¡
¡
í
¡
o~
0:
.!
0;
j
0:
0:
.
o
o
"':
M
M
.
o
"
....
I
,,;
"':
.,
0"-
"
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II ¡,..
¡¡ ~
II~
II I'
II
II ^
II '-J
II n.
II '"'-J
:: >
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
If
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
"
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
"
If
II
II
II
If
If
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
If
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
o(
CJ1(!10 '
en z .
ouo
..J .
Q:>
:J:
;(!)
;lJJ
cn~o
moo
0' I .
..JQO
cz
:I:IJJ
iCQ
( ') ."
cnQO
0, <J: .
...J Q: 0 ¡
Q' (!1 r", ¡ M m U') N
:1:' ¡ m -.0 m ....
¡ .... b") M, ~
'N&nIDO
; 1J") r", D"'-: q-
LtJ --.0 q- .... ~ ....
>; 0 a. 0 0 o¡ 0
I-! "0,.. .; .
...... ¡ · ....J 0 0 0: 0
Uil- " ( )
O;::J.... '
...1:0
LLI;
:> ¡ ,OM (\I: If)
: : .... In q-i It')
; ...J...!.
M L1J q- 0 1f)¡ M
· I . 0"- :>. N N .... ' ...
:>;00 . ;
IJJ' . q- I I
...J ~ 0 q-! IIi
UJ' &n ¡
¡ " 0 q-! "
¡ 0 M 0: If)
<I . . .~ .
o L1J " CD ....! N
o cc .....;....
· , · · <r, ¡
~'~~ I
...J::J If): I
lLJ , IJJ
N --0 0"- Itl CD
o Þ-I,M M ~¡~
o U) ¡
M >: 0 i
.... ..... '0 !
o t-C. I
o g,z 0 ¡
II ...J ..... I'
LU,
Z:>; I
tJ ; I
>1 N I
6:æ~ I
~;U ~ I
,([;
u
~
UJ ,N I
t- : ~ t
~ ~: I.L 0:. I
([a::( )
Þ-4 <to .
; ! U) I ~ I
Þ-4 ~ I
r", --0 ~
v LU' m I N\.
I~: ~ I '"
.... ; a: en,
! LLI UJ, \ '
z; ... ~ "-
C!J: W Þ-t, .. 1\
Þ-t!:E: N (ß '"
01 ([ -=:- I ~
UJ~ IJ1 ~
Q Q i '.u
~a:: ~
! LLJ UJ·
.1 I- f'. H
0::' l1J " ..J'
O:E: . ([/
UJ([N
Xi..... ~
I-¡C
...J
<I:
<II-
UO
I-
U
<I:Z
u....
t!Jw
1-:>
:::t([
..J
ŒI<I:
::lI-
mo
I-
<tJ:
WI-
Q:O
<I:1:n
U')
.....
Q
o <I:
II- lñ
L<J:
'0 l-
I fE 01
I
,
( )
GlL.
U
Z
lLlJJ
Q:I-
Z
....
WU
!:z
.....0
I-U
o
('~
.
0-
.....
"
f'-
..c
o
10
.
o
o
.;t
.
to
M
q-
10
.
M
o
o
.
o
.;t
o
o
.
o
o
"
o
o
.
o
~
"
N
q-
.
M
CD
....
In
U"J
.
D"-
~
~
.
In
....
II
II
II
II
II
,
,
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II·
II
111
III
II'
II
II
II
"
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
"
( 0
cnt!Jo
tr.I:I: .
oUo
I...J .
'Q :>
:J:
~
~
(!I
UJ
001710
:tr'JQ;O
'0 I .
...JOO
CZ I
:I: UJ ;
~
I ¡
~
~
"
en · N
(J)QO'
o <I .
..J a::: 0'
Q (!) .
:z:
,
~--o--.o....
-lJ"'~o
~MOO
M (\, MOO
O"-M~....
i W ~ M .... ....
> .... a.. 0 0: 0 0
I- --0 0 . ., . .
Þ-4 .; ...J 0 0: 0 0
U I- --0: UJ ,jl,
C ::I ....:
ïrl C I 1
:> .... ~! 0 M ~
I .... 0: --0 0-.
¡...J . .! . .
....' UJ N D'¡ -=:- N
· · 0 i :> N ..... .... .....
:> to ., ¡
UJ .~; i
:Ld c~: ¡
Ii ! 0 N! " 0--
f I M --a. It') ....
, i<J: . . . .
M 1JJ CD 0"-. r~ q-
I D"'-: c.r:: ! .... ....
, · · · <I
r :> to ~¡
iLLJ .-=t
! ...J ::I If)
IIJJ !IJJ I
: ¡N~NQ)....
o : Þ-4 M q-, ~ In
o 'u),
M> o! j
....., t- f'.[ ,
o ......' l
.. U ~ I
ooz.... I
II~..JÞ-I; I
: IJJ ' I
z:>
u > 0':
I- 0-- I
~ (J') ..
tJ U. q-:
([ u D'!
a...... ¡
([ ¡
j(.J
ad 1
~ g! ¡
1Jl<t. ¡
:E:! 1J.J U. .....:
<t c:: en ....:
..... ([
'c '
¡
a I ~,'
~ LI"): ~
id 81 l!".,
q-; : ~~' ~ ,
o 0'
I...J .;
(J') d
. cc I UJ
lz~ ~
(!J L1J I......
11 ...... L: If) U)
(J)<I~'
¡ lLJ t-4 I LJJ
I Q Q ¡~
a: læ
I LLJ ,IJJ
·I-CDI-
a:lJJ~...J
'O~ -<r:
I LLI <I: M
:t:t-fct;
~ Q I
~
~
~
I
Ie
I-
I
I
I
I
I-~----
------------------------------------------------------------
I-
t'--'
ALTERNATE BASE WIDTHS-
BASE WIDTH DEPTH VELOCITY
FT , EI__.EP.S__,________.___~_____ __ _______ u___._ ___.___m________________
0.00 2.76 4.592
1.00 2.60 4.595
I---~~-~-·-~:-~~- c: :-~~-------,----,---,-.-----
I
- .._--,--~._- ----
1
---------~------~---------------------------~-------------- ----------
1_. _ c_ _
--... ---~ -~--~-..__._--_._--_._------
I-------------------"c,__c_'_m,_____,__ __, c ,,__ __ '__,_.
1------,- -,--, ---__,_c '-----------,-------__, c
Itt------'----'---'--- ------- c '.'-- '-----
a-
r-------
-..---------
\,
(
(
OPEN~EL-COMeU_TAI10NS_EOB_:_____h_________ .___ ____ __.__._
------------------------------------------------------------
- ---- --. - --_.__. .--...-- ._---...._-~--------,- -. -- ---
3-814, ROYAL COURT DRAINAGE CHANNEL
----.---------...--- ~-
. ~~~~~N~~~f:\~ÕEFFICIEN=r__--'----o_:-6360'--IEA.eíll£N .
SIDE SLOPE (HORIZ.) / (1) FT 3.0000 t! I-IANJJ €' L.
FL.ºJ'l1..J~~Sl.ºPE .FT /1 00__ -__________º~600000 __ ._ _ _ _, .. ___,,_
BASE WIDTH FT 6.0000
FLOW RATE CFS 105.0000
BOTIOI'i..-.SLOPLlEI---£ER FOQIL~ O__OO,OOQ.0_,,__,,__.. _n _",,,_ _.___'__________ _______.. ____ ____ __'_' .
--. "-'~--~ ----- ~-- .-----.--. .--.- .
- .- -."-'--- ~.. -.-. - -,-. --.__.,-_..._-~.,.._-----_..- _. -._- --~.,---_..
------------------------------------------------------------
-----.-------- --.._------ ----.._._-~-. -.- ---..-------- '..-
_. -----..--..-- ~-....~ .'..... -- .._-~--_.._-----,------~--
C~LCULAIED--.DEerR..QE_ELQW -,,=-_L..96~Ã_EL± _ L FT: F~ IF Eð pA¿O_,
CALCULATED VELOCITY = 4.4946 FPS TOP = 17.79 FT.
= 23, 7'1 ¡::r,
*-.---- ---..-........--- -- ._--- .-..--....----.- ------.
-------.-----.----------.-.,..--.-- -.
_. ~_._._-_._,._--.._-_._-~--'"-----,---
------~- --.-..- _. .----
- -- -- - .. . -_. -.- -.------ -.~ --.. -
- --- -. --__.~_.H.,___ _____........._______.__ ._____._.__
----- '--.. -------.---
-- '. ..---...-------.....
-~-_._------ -.--.---- _.~----.._-------------_.- - -.----.---
-- . - --_.-- -------.------..-.-.- -- .------.--.-- -~. --------
- -------.---- - ----------------.---.------ ---- --- ------
--- ---.-.- ----._- -.._. ---.--------- -----------.--.--------.---- -- --
---.-__.._. __no __-.. .__..__ ___.____.~__________.______._ __ ____
---._-----.__._--~ ---
- - ---~- ---.----.---
- -- -_.._-- ----.-------
---- ------ -- - ._------_._-----~-- -.-
----.-------.--- . ._---- -
- ---..--..---..--.---
_. .-.---------------.-----.--.---.-.--.--
- - .-- .....-~--_._.-.--._. ---.----- --------,~---~
------------------------- --. -- ------
- -- ------ ._--
--------- --_._--~ ---- ----.-
--.--- .______ _n..____
- - ------ .----.----.-- --_.-~---------------._._------------ ------------ -----..--
I
I
e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I_~____--_.
1-----'-----'---,,,'-'____' '----'__c____ _ ___~_,___,__ _
I
I¡--~--"--- '---,- c_,___ u_____
t-'-------~~--------'--'---- c-"__~__,,_,_c ----
I
(
(
OPE~-.CH8NNEL COMPUIA T.lDNS-.E_QR.:_ ______________ ___
------------------------------------------------------------
-- --_. ------------. ----.-- ---.---- --'-----_.-------~. ---------.-.---.
3-814, ROYAL COURT DRAINAGE CHANNEL
---- --- --- -- --_.--..._----~--_..----,--
---- -_.~- - -----------------. --,----- - _. .--
~~~~~N~~~A~OEFF I C lENT O. 0150 (!:O AlC REi T € . - .,
SIDE SLOPE <HORI Z. > / (1) FT 1. 5000 a. J.I A NfJ é L
FLOWLINE SLOPE FT / 1 OO_,~~ºOOº_º._ ____..,___ ______,
BASE WIDTH FT 4.0000
FLOW RATE CFS 105.0000
BOTTOM SLOPE (FT. PER FOJ:JT> =-~º__~,.9_º..9-º,ºº_____ c___________
-------- -----
--- --- ----
------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------- --~..._-------_...._---- -----
CALCU~AT~P DEPTH O~JE~OW =
CALCULATED VELOCITY =
1. 8314-E.L_._.r__I__E_'G___.F ~g~~~.t;?
8.4975 FPS TOP = 9.49 FT.
;: IZ.lf1 FT
----~-------_. -.------. --~--~--_. ----.---.
------------------------------------------------------------
-....--.. ...------------ - - - -------~..._-------~
~--------
------------...---- ._- ------.--- _. ---
ALTERNATE BASE WIDTHS-
BASE WIDTH DEPTH VELOCITY
FT FJ____FES
0.00 2.85 8.602
0.00 2.85 8.602
9.00 1. 25 1~21_Z____________________
14.00 0.98 6.951
----------...--.-. -.. ._._._~_.- ---.--..-----. .--- - '----'--- -----_._-_._~------
- -- - - .--..-. .. . - -- ... .---.---. ..-.- - -- _..- -_. - --
-.---------.---.-----..-..- - ----.--..------ --.--. .-..--
-~-------------_._--_._--- ------- -_. ~- ---._. _. ..- ..- ---- .-- --- --------
----.----------------- ---------------------- ..------- .---- ...------- --------.-------
..-.-------.--------.---
------- ----- ------.----.-.---.----------------- --
--- - --._.~._------_._--
-.----------
---- ---- -.------------..---- -~_._-------
--.----.- -- -- --.--.-. - --~ -- -- -------------------- ---
----- _._----_.-._----~---_._--_._. -------..~--- -------.----------
_.- ---.-----.. --.---.--.--------- -- ---- --- ----.-- .-------
~_.._-- ------ - .----.- - -----. .--------
--.------------.----
----.-----------.------ ._-+---- ._- --- - -.
---.-- .. - - .----.----------------.--- -.------------.--
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Page 3
p & Z Minutes
January 23, 1986
2. PS 85-94
PS 85-94
APPROVED
3.
PS 85-96
PS 85-96
APPROVED
4.
PS 5-97
PS 85-97
APPROVED
5.
PS 85-99
(
r
Request of James B. & Donna L. Hamm
for replat of Lots 4RA, 4RB, 6 & 7,
Block 3, Industrial Park Addition
Mr. Hallford made the motion t
approve PS 85-94. This moti
seconded by Ms. Flippo and he
carried 5-0.
Request of Fenimore-F
final plat of Weste
Inc. for
Addition.
Vice Chairman W d called for the
representativ of this request to
please orward.
F itt with Stembridge and
es came forward.
Vic Chairman Wood asked if the issue
o the Lone Star Gas easement had been
esolved.
Mr. Fluitt said it had not been
resolved, but they hope to get it
resolved within the next few days.
Vice Chairman Wood said it would have
to be resolved before going to the
City Council with this plat.
Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve
PS 85-96 Subject to getting the Lone
Star Gas easement resolved. This
motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and
the motion carried 5-0~
Request of Crow-Nowlin Associates, #1
for replat of Lot 2R, Block 4,
University Plaza Addition.
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 85-97. This motion was seconded bv
Mr. Hallford and the motion carried
5-0.
Request of H & S Partnership for final
plat of Royal Court Addition.
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
Page 4
P & Z Minutes
January 23, 1986
(
PS 85-99
DENIED
6.
PS 85-102
PS 85-102
APPROVED
(
Vice Chairman Wood called for the
representative of this request to
please come forward.
John Hawkins, 6116 Riviera Drive, came
forward.
Vice Chairman Wood asked why the 15
foot building line. He said the
Commission desired a 20 foot building
line.
Mr. Hawkins stated he wanted the 15
foot building line to match Diamond
Loch Addition.
Vice Chairman Wood said it was
mentioned in the motion on the
preliminary plat that they be 20 feet.
He said there is also a requirement of
a concrete flume. He said the City
Staff has required the applicants
engineer provide specific data to the
City Engineer.
Mr. Hawkins said it was just a matter
of his engineer getting with the City
Engineer. He said their swale would
handle 43 cubic feet per second which
is 5 cubic feet more than needed.
Mr. Schwinger asked if Mr. Hawkins
agreed to the 20 feet building line.
Vice Chairman Wood said he did not.
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to deny
PS 85-99. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Hallford and the motion for denial
carried 5-0.
Request of Hanson Properties
preliminary plat of
Addition.
Mr. Hallford made the motion to
approve PS 85-102. This motion was
seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion
carried 5-0.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
-
( (
\ \
JOHN E. LEVITT ENGINEERS, INC.
ENGINEERS · PLANNERS
3921 VANCE ROAD · FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118
.
284-0981
January 13, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Lots 1 to 12, Block 1
ROYAL COURT ADDITION
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
Pursuant to the City Engineerls letter dated October 1, 1985, we offer the
following rep1ys:
1. Please refer to our letter dated October 2, 1985 concerning the points
mentioned. It is the Developer's intention that these items be brought
before the City Council for consideration.
2. This subdivision was originally reviewed in October, 1985. The Master
Thoroughfare Plan was approved by the City Council in August, 1985. The
Developer feels that this question should have been addressed prior to
this point in the review process, and is requesting that the
right-of-way width of eighty feet (801) be accepted as submitted.
3. As the Developer has no control over the location of the individual
driveways, we feel that fewer conflicts will be encountered with the
water services installed near the lot lines.
4. No exceptions taken.
We trust that these comments will be sufficient to allow the City to process
our request Final Plat approval.
Should you need any further information, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
JOHN E. LEVITT ENGINEERS, INC.
S. Scott Stewart,
cc Mr. John L. Hawkins
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
(~'I ~
JOHN E. LEVITT ENGINEERS, INC.
ENGINEERS .
392 t VANCE ROAD
PLAN~~ERS
· FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76118
284-0981
.
October 2, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N. E.- loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: Lots 1 to 12, Block 1
ROYAL COURT ADDITION
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
Pursuant to the City Engineer1s letter dated October 1, 1985, we offer the
following replys:
1. As this subdivision is not a subsequent filing of Diamond loch Addition,
and pursuant to the requirements of the City1s subdivision ordinance,
Section 1-03, Article D, SUb-paragraph 2, the Developer is requesting
approval of the name ROYAL COURT ADDITION.
2. No exceptions taken.
3. No exceptions taken.
4. The certification has been added to the Drainage Study.
5. The drainage swale shown upon the plans has been proposed to alleviate
any potential future problems concerning over flow drainage for the
existing thirty inch (3011) reinforceed concrete pipe. To require an
additional concrete swale over the existing pipe would be such a
financial incumberance upon the Developer that project would become
financially unfeasible. The original construction plans for this
section of storm drain should have made allowances for the amount of
run-off overflow.
6. Property corner monumentation will be noted on the Final Plat.
7. The existing zoning has been added to the Plat.
8. The distances will be added to the Final Plat prior to sUbmittal for
final approval.
9. The developer is requesting relief under Section XXIV, Article 24.18 of
the City1s Zoning Ordinance due to the irregular shape of this
particular property. Calcualtions are being submitted to show the
actual square footage areas.
10. The Developer is requesting a variance from the required twenty feet
(201) to fifteen feet (151) due to the irregular shape and size of the
affected lots.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
(:)
(
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 2, 1985
Page 2
11. No exceptions taken. The sanitary sewer easement is being prepared and
will be transmitted to the City upon execution.
12. No exceptions taken.
13. No exceptions taken.
We trust that these comments are sufficient to allow the City to process our
application for Preliminary/Final Plat approval.
Should you need any further information, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
JOHN E. LEVITT ENGINEERS, INC.
~J
Stewart, E. I. T..
cc Mr. John L. Hawkins
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
(
(
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
December 31, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-814, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ROYAL COURT ADDITION,
LOTS 1 THRU 12, BLOCK 1,
FINAL PLAT,
PS 85 - 99, GRID MAP 137
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 Please see our letter dated, October 1, 1985, PS 8S-77, paragraph #1,
regarding changing the name of the addition; #S, concerning the lining of
the drainage swale; #9, concerning lots sizes that are less than minimum
for R-l zoning; #10, regarding the building line along Glenview Drive;
#11, concerning obtaining offsite sanitary sewer easement; and #12,
regarding prorata for 8-inch water line.
2 When this new subdivision was initially reviewed, the proposed
Thoroughfare Plan had not yet been adopted, and an upgraded designation
for Glenview Drive was not presented. The new Thoroughfare Master Plan
designates Glenview Drive as an MSU thoroughfare. Although the
recommended right-of-way width is not presented in the Plan for this
section, we would recommend a 61-foot BIB pavement width with 12-foot
parkways for a total width of 8S-feet. The existing right-of-way width is
80-feet, therefore, an additional 2.S feet would be required from each
side if an 8S-foot right-of-way width is to be obtained for Glenview
Drive.
3 The developer should place single water services toward the center of the
lots, 10 feet from the sanitary sewer services.
4 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I·
Ie
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
'-
I
I
(
(
Subdivision Review Letter continued
ROYAL COURT ADDITION
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
~
fIA1-W,
RICH RD . ALBIN, P.E.
R\~A/r a
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
December 31, 1985
PS 85 - 99
PAGE
2
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
'-
I
I
(,-
(-
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas
October 1, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-814t CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
ROYAL COURT ADDITION,
LOTS 1 TO 12, BLOCK I,
PRELIMINARY PLAT,
PS 85 - 77, GRID MAP 137
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 Since this proposed plat is contiguous with the IIDiamond Loch Additionll,
we would recorrmend that the subdivision name be changed from IIRoyal Court
Additionll to the IIDiamond Loch Additionll and the lot and block numbers
revised accordingly.
2 The Owner IS Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary
Certification should be fully executed before approval of the final plat.
3 A surveyor IS seal, certification, and signature should be affixed to the
final plat.
4 In accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements the Developerls
Engineer should affix the following certification to the drainage plan:
4.1 I, , a professional engineer registered in the
State of Texas, have prepared this drainage study in compliance
with the latest published requirements and criteria of the City
of North Richland Hills, and have verified that the topographic
information used in this study is in compliance with said
requirements and is otherwise suitable for developing this
workable overall Plan of Drainage which can be implemented
through proper subsequent detailed construction planning.
SIGNATURE
, P.E. SEAL
5 The proposed drainage swale located over the existing underground storm
drain along the east side of this property should be concrete lined or
lined with other material approved by the Public Works Department, as
required in the Subdivision Ordinance.
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
Ie
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
'-
I
I
(:
(~
Subdivision Review Letter continued
ROYAL COURT ADDITION
6 In accordance with County requirements, property corner monumentation
should be noted on the final plat.
7 The existing zoning for this development area should be noted on the
Plat.
8 Some distances along Royal Court are not shown on the plat. These should
be shown on the final plat.
9 Some of the lots are less than the 13,000 square foot area minimum, lots
2, 3, and 8 are less than the 120 foot average depth minimum, and lots 1,
6, and 11 are less than the 85 foot minimum width at the building set back
for R-l zoning. The developer's engineer should be required to present
calculations which verify that the lots in this proposed subdivision
comply with minimum area requirements for this zoning.
10 The side building set back along Glenvia~ Drive should be 20 feet,
rather than 15 feet.
11 The easement for the off-site sanitary sewer should be obtained and an
executed copy transmitted to the city, if an offsite easement does not
already exist.
12 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of an existing
a-inch water line in Glenview Drive. We would estimate prorata at $5.50
per linear foot for one-half of the existing line for a total length of
589.74 feet.
13 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owr,er remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
fJuÁcU?Lw, ~:-
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, Ci~ Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
October 1, 1985
PS 85 - 77
2
PAGE
I ~'
Ie
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
'-
I
I
(
(
~~
KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
'¡ ~./,_. ~ r-
" ~ '-' ~'/ /' ,.' '~/¡-,/ f ,
JA'~ / I ,"H..) ,.f,tP
. . .J- -J "c;.., 6
/r<-f~,/>l4;- ¿d/v-(--,
~ :7tJ..y T .J' "~' y
,;. f /) /~ ''Í~,
.,vvVtvl , *~
I...· ", (~.. ) /¡/v' f ,\
r.... '. (.. , ,.YÞ'
~ .A (~(.,A., .\.1 I,vV.r·6-
11 \",.../"" --- - / ,I,. t \.,{,'"
HILLS' . AAþ.~~/..;f f.- ---1,~
{,V'~ -v ¿f'.' J:.l~£"...{,¿~ -
_'c~1
n~ ~ v-
,.0~ ,., ¡'/'. IÍ /.. ,~
,J ,If'~
subdivision and offer the
December 31, 1985
Planning and Zoning Comm;ss;cn
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE:
3-814, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
ROYAL COURT ADDITION,
LOTS 1 THRU 12, BLOCK 1,
FINAL PLAT, .
PS 85 - 99, GRID MAP 137
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this
:follow;ng comments:
1 Please see our letter dated, October 1, 19B5, PS B5-77, paragraph #1,
regarding changing the name of the addition; #5, concerning the lining of
the drail1,ð.ge swale; #9, concerning lots sizes thàt are less than minimum
fö'rR=ízoning; #10, regarding the building line along G1enview Drive;
#11, concerning obtaining offsite sanitary sewer easement; and #12,
~~~~~d;ng prorata for a-inch water line.
-L·...._~~~,~,;¡f!-·1Ut4~·"...
2 When this new subdivision was initially reviewed, the proposed
Thoroughfare P1ãn had not yet been adopted, and an upgraded designation
for G1enview Drive was not presented. The new Thoroughfare Master Plan
designates Glenview Drive as an M5U thoroughfare. Although the
recommended right-of-way width is not presented in the Plan for this
section, we would recommend a 61-foot BIB pavement width with 12-foot
parkways for a total width of B5-feet. The existing right-of-way width is
BO-feet, therefore, an additional 2.5 feet would be required from each
side if anB5-foot right-of-way width is to be obtained for G1enview
O-r i v e .
3 Th,e-deï.el.oper.~_~þou1d place, single water services toward the center of the
_1 ot~~oiñ-lh~'iªni~ sëwer ser~i~~~,~:~-" n..----_'-
4 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the 'Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
'-
I
I
(
Subdivision 'Review Letter continued
(
ROYAL COURT ADDITION
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
RI/if;~,
R\~A/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
December 31, 1985
PS 85 - 99
2
PAGE
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
e Operating Budget _
¿;2/ ~) K1~L~
o ~6:~a;.zt~nature ' City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
I;'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
"
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
Department:
C "I M "D 3/24/86
ounCI eetlng ate:
Agenda Number: PS 86-6
Subject:
Request of J P I Land Inc. for Final Plat
of Foster Village Section 19.
This Final Plat Application is presented for consideration of Foster Village Section 19.
The property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive West of Douglas lane and
north of the existing Foster Village Subdivision. The purpose for the proposed plat is
to divide the subject tract into individual single family lots in conformance with the
R-3 Zoning District.
In the Commission's deliberations on the Preliminary Plat the street patterns as
dictated by the Thoroughfare Plan were discussed. The Commission stipulated that the
plat include the necessary right of way for the future widening of Rufe Snow Drive, that
the north-south Collector Street be moved to Crosstimber in lieu of Meadowview Terrace
and that the extension of John Autrey Road as a two lane Collector Street not be
extended through this subdivision. The applicant's Final Plat submittal contains all of
the stipulations of the Commission.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Final Plat of Foster Village Section 19
as submitted.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
t Finance Director
Paqe 1 of
1
I
!
Ie
I
I
I
I
I,
-.~
-.-
1·-
C-I
lIiO
AG
f58.- 7
ND&lU 1t.u:::.ML.AIJÞ EST.
¿. t.5e. 15.1;
R-7- MF
C -I
R-2
!f09
R...2
AG
R-2
1227
R-2
1171
AG
R-2
I
Page 3
P & Z Minutes
March 13, 1986
(
Ie
I
4.
PS 86-6
I
I
PS 86-6
APPROVED
I
5.
PZ 86-5
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
/
/
/
/
/
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
(
Request of JPI Land Inc. for final
plat of Foster Village, Section 19.
Chairman Bowen stated all the comments
have been complied with.
Ms. Nash made the motion to approve
PS 86-6. This motion was seconded by
Mr. Wood and the motion carried 4-0.
Request of Viola C. Hunter to rezone
Tract lOA, W.W. Wallace Survey,
Abstract 1606, from its present
classification of R-2 (Single Fa · y)
to C-2 (Commercial). This pro rty is
located at the northwest cor r of
Glenview Drive and Ashmore
Chairman Bowen opened
Hearing and called or those wishing
to speak in favo of this request to
please come fo ard.
,/
came forward. She said she
this property since 1942 and
water ad never been up to her house.
2fs. unter stated that Chrysler wants
buy the property and put up a
~ uilding where her house is and they
~/~ would park cars on the rest of the
~/' property. She said they would bring
/// cars to be serviced. Ms. Hunter said
./ she requests her property be rezoned
so she can sell it. She said the
house is old and needs repair and she
has too much ground and she has to
hire it mowed.
Chairman Bowen called for those
wishing to speak in opposition to this
request to please corne forward.
There being no one wishing to speak,
the Chairman closed the Public
Hearing.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
Ow~ D. Long and Associat[¿Inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
March 4, 1986
Mrs. Wanda Calvert
. Planning and Zoning Coordinator
Planning and Zoning Commission
City af North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills~ Texas 76118
RE: Foster Village Addition
Section 19 - Final Plat
PS-86-6
Dear Mrs. Calvert:
We have' received a copy of the City Engineer's comment letter dated
February 28th for the above referenced subdivision and have the following
comments:
1. The Owner's telephone number has been added to the plat.
2. The Surveyor's certification has been added to the plat.
3. The building setback has been increased to 26-feet on the
plat which now makes the lot width 65-feet at the building
setback.
4.1. The Rufe Snow Drive right-af-way width has been added to the
plat.
4.2. The additional 25-feet as requested on the preliminary plat
approval has been dedicated, making 55-feet from the center
line on the east side and 40-feet on the west side.
4.3. This 'item. is a recommendation. to the Commission, Council and
Staff on which we have no additional comment.
5. The 'alignment of John Autrey Road was discussed when the preliminary
plat'was approved and Greenleaf Drive is to remain 50-feet in
width and a residential street.
6. Our plan shows Crosstimber Lane to have a pavement thichness of
6-inches. As discussed at preliminary plat, Greenleaf Drive is
to have a pavement thichness of 5-inches as standard. Rufe Snow,
as construct~d to the west and to the south of this platting, has
a thickness of 6-inches. There appears to be some transition pro-
blems with 8-inch thickness in this area and a future overlay of
2-;nches to the west and to the south. We will discuss this with
the Public Works Director when he returns.
1615 Precinct Line Road - Suite 106 / Hurst, Texas 76053 / Phone (817) 281-8121
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
..
Mrs. Wanda Calve~
March 4, 1986
(
-2-
,7. The Owner has been made ~ware that he is responsible for all provisions
of the ordinances, policies and procedures of the City.
Sincerely,
(1 c (
,~~ ong, P.
Consulting Engine
(1£
ODL/ml
cc: Mr. Jim Harris
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
(
(
KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
February 28, 1986
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-841, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
FOSTER VILLAGE ADDITION,
SECTION 19,
FINAL PLAT,
PS 86 - 6, GRID MAP 40
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 The telephone number of the owner should be on the plat.
2 In accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements, the
Developer1s Surveyor should affix the following certification to the final
plat:
State of Texas
County of
I, the undersigned, a (registered public surveyor/licensed land
surveyor) in the state of Texas, hereby certify that this plat is
true and correct and was prepared from an actual survey of the
property made under my supervision on the ground.
(Surveyor's Seal)
Reglstered Public Surveyor or
Licensed Land Surveyor
3 Lot widths at the building setback on Lots 3 through 6 Block 92 are less
(60.661) than the minimum 65 feet measured at the building setback
required for R-3 zoning.
4 Rufe Snow Drive comments:
4.1 Rufe Snow Drivels right-of-way width should be shown on the
plat.
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
Subdivision Review L~cer continued
~rOSTER VILLAGE ADDITION
4.2 Rufe Snow is designated as a future M6D section along the
frontage of this proposed subdivision. The developer is
dedicating 25 feet on the east side for future widening.
Additional dedication on the West (Watauga) side will be
required if the future M6D street is centered in the
right-of-way. If all widening is to be accomplished on the east
side then the dedication should be increased as required to
provide a total lID-foot right-of-way.
4.3 We would recommend that you communicate with the Watauga
Planning Commission, Council and staff to coordinate plans for
future widening of Rufe Snow in accordance with the North
Richland Hills Thoroughfare Plan. If Watauga does not wish to
participate in future widening or in assistance in obtaining
additional right-of-way then North Richland Hills property
owners along Rufe Snow on the east side north of the St. Louis
Southwestern Railroad to Bursey Road will have to provide all
the additional right-of-way required.
5 Please see our letter dated October 1, 1985, PS 85-74, regarding John
Autrey Road's future alignment. Valley View Drive has been renamed
Greenleaf Drive. Also, see our comments regarding prorata.
6 We would recommend that the pavement thickness of Crosstimber Lane and
Greenleaf Drive (if Greenleaf is designated a C2U section) be increased
from 5-inches to at least 6-inches. Also, we we would recommend that the
proposed thickness on Rufe Snow Drive be increased from 6-inches on 6-inch
lime stabilized subgrade to 8-inches HMAC on 8-inches stabilized subgrade
(about 40 lb/sy lime based on 6-percent for 110 lb/cy soil weight). If
the Public Works Department concurs then the details on sheet no. 42
should be revised accordingly.
7 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
Agreement, if thi s proposed pl at is approved. If no such spec ific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
~aJW. ~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
February 28, 1986
PS 86 - 6
PAGE
2
I'
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
Subdivision Review L~cer continued
~rOSTER VILLAGE ADDITION
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
February 28, 1986
PS 86 - 6
PAGE
3
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
c
(-
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
October 1, 1985
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
Re: 3-841, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
FOSTER VILLAGE ADDITION,
SECTION 19,
PRELIMINARY PLAT,
PS 85 - 74, GRID MAP 40
We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the
following comments:
1 The Ownerls ACknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary
Certification should be fully executed before approval of the final plat.
2 The Surveyorls Certificate should be affixed to the final plat.
3 The distance on the most northerly western line (577.921) is different
from the metes and bounds description (377.92').
4 Lot widths at the building setback on Lots 3 and 6 Block 92 appear to be
less than the minimum of 65-feet required for R-3 zoning.
5 Bearings and curve data for lots should be shown on the final plat.
6 Rufe Snow Drivels right-of-waŸ width should be shown on the plat. We
would note that Rufe Snow is designated as a future M6D Thoroughfare with
a lID-foot right-of-way width. The existing right-of-way appears to be
aD-feet. Therefore, at least 15 additional feet of right-of-way
dedication is required assuming that the other 15 feet can be obtained
from the City of Watauga as required for future widening to an M6D
section.
'7 The Thoroughfare Master Plan designates Meadowview Terrace as a proposed
C2U with a 60-foot right-of-way from Starnes to Bursey Road. Do you want
to replace Meadowview Terrace with Crosstimber Lane? The Thoroughfare
Master Plan also shows the future alignment of John Autrey Road, a
proposed C2U collector, to pass through along the south of this
development to Meadowview Terrace.' If Valley View Drive replaces John
Autrey Road as an east-west C2U collector connection to the north-south
C2U collector, Crosstimber Lane, then the Valley View Drive right-of-way
should be increased to 60-feet.
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
(~
C
FOSTER VILLAGE ADDITION
Subdivision Review Letter continued
8 The proposed subdivision, Highland Oaks, is located north of and adjacent
to this proposed development. The proposed location of Highland Oaks
Drive in this development is aligned with the proposed section in the
Highland Oaks Addition. We would note that in our Review Letter for
Highland Oaks Addition, PS 85-57, dated August 9, 1985, in Item No. 13, we
indicated that Highland Oaks Drive appeared to be located in the general
vicinity required for an extension of Meadowview Terrace, and that this
street should be upgraded to a C2U collector as shown in the Thoroughfare
Master Plan. If Crosstimber Lane replaces Meadowview Terrace as this C2U
collector then Highland Oaks Drive would not require widening. We would
recommend that the owners of the Tract located north of Crosstimber Lane,
Bursey Joint Venture, be advised that Crosstimber Lane, a C2U collector is
planned to be extended northward through their property to Bursey Road, if
Crosstimber is selected as the main C2U collector in the area instead of
Meadowview Terrace.
9 The water lines in Redbud Drive (between Crosstimber Lane and Park Willow
Lane), Crosstimber Lane and Park Willow Lane should be increased from
6-inches to 8-inches.
10 The sanitary sewer lines in Sunny View lane, Timber Hill Drive, and
Valley View Drive should be extended east to Douglas Lane.
11 Water and sewer services and sizes should be shown on the utility layout
plans.
12 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of an existing
16-inch water line in Rufe Snow Drive. We would estimate prorata at $5.50
per linear foot for one-half of an 8-inch line for a total length of
1021.49 feet.
13 The developer should also p~his prorata sháre of the existing 6-inch
water line in Douglas lane. We would estimate prorata at $4.00 per linear
foot for one half of the existing line for a total length of 1,318.81
feet.
14 The developer should be required to pay his share of the cost of paving
Rufe Snow Drive, if he has not already done so.
15 The owner should be required to escrow his prorata share of future
street improvements on Douglas lane or construct any required paving
improvements along the frontage of his property at this time.
16 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that
he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning
Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other
applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances
and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer
October 1, 1985
PS 85 - 74
PAGE
2
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
c-
c-
Subdivision Review Letter continued
FOSTER VILLAGE ADDITION
Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific
variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for
all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory
codes.
Please call if you have any questions.
,,~
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development
October 1, 1985
PS 85 - 74
PAGE
3
C4U
,__-1._______ ------r
-Xc ~ ; I
I 'X _ M6DI SHADY GI~OVa ~~_
r - l1 ~L I ~~
~ 1
:I I ~I Q I 1-
M4D j WILSON RD;... n 0, Q..ro I
.. - ..~ ., '-..'::;). ...
r ù. J""~~ . 00"',.. ~ I ~I
::> it cJ2.: ... -- - 1, l.--rz.. I
C\ ~=- - '.. D ~
üJr ~ C4U '. r _ -.h _
BURSEY RD tl ~ - - - - ·'\.-"Æ-
- - - _ -- _if _ II....... ~
. 0 ~ ' ----~....., I' ------.-I - --=- ~ .
-. ~ I m '.
/I1~ADowVIEHI - - -..\ ~ \. ~ I- I >'3 .~ - t./ I _
~ ,V:- ü ~1 ~I .11 b2U I _--: r;--j \,-~
(!.t1 O$S TlMB€J?'........ '> 21.M~í-i- 1- -1þ,t7."~1 R"'i8'-~ uT ~
~ .... "" ''''[LN I I ..!:I' I -- ( v
' , ~ ~ :R,q. I II' C2LC' I I -:. :~::::> ¡ .
(,.t.. 51 ~ - I 10 't:;.~ - ~ c
' -.-.. ~ ~ -, >- 1 I ~ - - Ü a: ~
~ h~ ~ Q' - C~U I~__~ -~"'1~ ~
c:- -- t: ~I C\I :;) 0 -=::; rill _ · w C4U z
Q - - - - - II. - l -- -" 1-0 '-E~~ ~Q Ir t-
~ -HIGHTÕWERiìRD r1ÜJ ~ , _ 0 ::>llg ~
oJ -.- 1 ~ f:2 ~<J C\ll w Q °
- ~I _ ~ -l= ~I ~ ~ ~~ O¡ ~ ~ ~
- _~~ -_tL_, ~ n ~j~O_ ~~.' ~ Q.
1 -l~=fCHAPMAÑ ~ - ~ Ÿ I ~ IIr.lARTI~
1 ~ - ~ , .- ~ ~ l f\ C2U_
_.~ f2(!.rl0R1 A_~ ,"'( _
- c ~~,,.J~TA,,RV/d /'.~ ~ ~ t i I
/- ¿, -,' ~~I =>,::>1 I..;
.,-l- P6DJ ~~ -- ~o "- - - _ü-\........0 , (51 .L ....",
- j -, ((:'0/ 1-.1-.-
-. r'r-r-j' 'A I ....
I C4U \ 114 ~ ~~,"- :? T 1 R ~ "
~ S 'Cf4 J ¡S:IJE~- _ ~ '
-- --etÃOWNING ~ _ J ~~ ~ ~~'I:;.O,,'W..D,. ~ <0 "
I : ~~C:J - TC211 ~ It:.- ~\\ll l-I'TT1\" ~< ~ I'..... I
.. I ~ ,0v Q J-' _e: ~ 'o..,.\,t-Ë;- ~,jL. I I filAR}}Noo8 ~
., ~ ~ \(/ CO LEWIS '_ µ \..~~j _ ,
l · / r_~ c... [ -' 1 - 1 \ \ 1
\·~v I 01 ti - 1'C V~
'. :;: è...ti~ \, ( >-" ... ~ -I _ I C ---=ê=
~ I ,if. · ~ ~ - _ IIIII\,...., >- __ _~ _ "\ 2 "\
I rv'( ...1., ~ 1 I~ II ~ ~~~ ~r<D 1 ~ J _
: .. () "\~'" 11...J I~ ¡; Uf ~ i~ I '11 a. ~M.. _, M5U
\ ~ c .- ~ _ ---1 ~ I. :; 1 IV...... ..II ~.........
I
Ie
~
(
~
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
_ ._~.. ·~:"~"iP.&.~_';,... .:... .'.- .~...~*~~~~i"~~~~.!~~~~':;':~~~~:'~~4?'"~::~ ~~.~~
- . '~ ~:,.:-"" ..,--~. ........lll:llllï;..' ~~;~_. __ _ __ _____
. .
(~-
(-
I
r
I
-
-
~~
In .
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
Department:
3/24/86
Council Meeting Date:
Agenda Number: SO 86-5
Subject:
Request for Variance to the Sign Ordinance
for Northwood Plaza Shopping Center
Cambridge Company, Inc., the owners of the Northwood Plaza Shopping Center located on
the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Loop 820 Service Road has requested the City
Council to consider a variance to Section 4.1 of the Sign Ordinance which stipulates
that anyone development is to be limited to one ground sign. The applicant is
requesting that they be allowed to place a sign on the Rufe Snow frontage of their
shopping center and a second sign on the Loop 820 frontage of their project.
In Section 4.1 of the Ordinance it is also stated that in the case of a large shopping
center site located so as to have substantial frontage on two streets the City Council
may consider approval of a Ground Sign on each frontage. The Staff has noted that the
applicant's property includes 613 feet of frontage on Rufe Snow Drive and 672 feet of
frontage on the Freeway Service Road. The sign layout submitted would place one of the
proposed signs at the northern driveway of the Rufe Snow frontage and the second sign at
the eastern drive entrance of the Wal-Mart site. The proposed signs are identical and
are approximately 170 square feet in size.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is Staff's opinion that the provisions of Section 4.1 of the Sign Ordinance
stipulating the conditions under which more than one Ground Sign can be approved for a
major shopping center have been met on the Northwood Plaza Shopping Center and the City
Council may wish to approve the request for the two signs.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Oper ing Budget
o r
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
K/II/~
City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
t Finance Director
Pace 1 of
I The Cambridge Companies Development Corporation
16660 Dallas Parkway, Suite 2000 Dallas, Texas 75248 Telephone 214 931,7311, ~v1etro 263,4232
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I"
I
Cambrid'ge
Mr. Rodger Line
City Manager
P.o. Box 18609
Horth Richland Hills, Texas
March II, 1986
76118
BE: Northwood Plaza Shopping Center
Rufe Snow Drive and North Loop West 820
Horth Richland Hills, Texas
Dear Sir:
I would like to request a Sign Variance granting the
installation of two (2) pylon signs at our above referenced
shopping center. Due to the enormous size of this project;
Phase I consisting of 46,983 square feet of retail space and a
46,000 square foot Hinyards Grocery Store and Phase II
consisting of 47,356 square feet of retail space plus an 83,491
square foot Wal-Mart store, 8,800 square foot Eckerds store,
22,000 square foot Advanced Self Serve Car Wash and an
additional 94,434 square feet of Future Restaurant Pads all
situated on approximately 19.655 acres, we feel the need for two
pylon signs is justified. We would like to install one of the
signs along Rufe Snow Drive which would serve Phase I and one
sign along the access road of Northeast Loop 820 which would
serve Phase II.
I would appreciate this request for a sign variance be scheduled
for review on your March 24th agenda. If you have any questions
concerning this matter, please contact me at your earliest
convenience.
Sin~ere~~
Ron Walther
Construction Coordinator
RW/km
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{'
I
-----_. -_._--- - --+---------.
r
(~~~
\.~-
P'-~. '-J ~'E:'.V .
r
¡,.~ ,
1 -¡~t
r
I
!
i
'Ib~'
'~'-4·
, "../
'-- tiT
. I
/2.'- o'
:\:-;,~ fD.:~, _.~:~/~ [Ì;~'.íF\\~D I'
¡ ~. . >'.J ,i ,( I ,¡-; . ,; 1\\ ~ \ \ I I: ¡ ))
I ¡ _\~'~r?~~ J^'-~ ~~~~ I
~ . ~~,~ G~j
<:;
-
~1
~D
,
¡ '0,R\~;'7~....nDœ, \ {;l¡'/'d'1ffi 1 0'1 I
I \ I ..1 I \1 ~ 'd !'.. I, I
_ .- i..-lJ1W-.J . L,w"'-' '\- ~
C~- ----I
[-~---_=_=__ 8 _h _. I
-.--- C ,
f I ¡ D
f I -- ~
c::-:-
/~(
;
;
!
(
I
I
¡
t I
, ¡
~1~
-
--. --- ------ - - ----- - ---
~ !:"'\. 'L:~ : ~. ~
TIC' ~ -/.... .r.~~...... iL--.J~ :'A~ ~ DeP-Ay.
· ~Jo... a~~Vt.I (iiiI.JFe~v ~~)
· ~ 0". ~ a-:CCf". a:~j~
¥ \\tL~Q.( 'ZP (la7 ~)
--
-
,.
~..
rf'
-.
CICIWa
- UIt.·r-.
.~~~~
-=-. -..:r. &.&.-.. -"\ ~
\JII.f-. LJW.T-. LJW. -.
.~. rc
, If fØl~
---- .., ~- . i5~
Ziti
. f ~
r ,
'-~ f
-~ I
-.~
__ ·1:,·..d ,~
- ~
<1'Aj_ uat_
-~ 1..I9"..!:; f ~_;_~
; CIt...x . ¡
'.-..-.~
",",-, " -:.r- .......
~..A':r"...c:::. . ~ JO
"""'~ ...z;'CI~..-
""~:....rx
\...
,,;-;,-~ ~
~_. ~-.:
.... '-..:JOt' ~
~& .~
--
--
~^,-~~...,~t5. ~
-- -
~ ,.-:~
.
.
.~ ~~
--. - _._- ----. -~--- ---- ----
---.- ------. --.------------------- -----------
- - .-~- -.-. _. --------
,
L-,. .-. \
I. " ~
:--~/
N
c.
~
13. ',..
--J.- I .....
~I
Ir-.--r-
~-
~
~-
=:1~ : i't
~... \JI I ~ i't".
..., ,-
=--ï ! ::t
'-=--.L ~. I·
~-
!:-""-
----r<ï.
'=I
~
----r
~-
Q.
>~. ..'- d
r CUS1'tIMUt NC:~1'~ 0'1 ..... _ .....
ACCIRESs
I.IXM1ON
DESIGNER ~
acx:a.n~ ~_ u..._
- - --_. - - -'-""-- --
- -
h
:::,.;:
,
,
I
I
!
I~:
lr-.
I .-
r 0.
r
,
¡
í
ICJI
IC)
r ,-
:Q
. ð::! ¡
TI
n
¡ f
r I
i ¡
IT
> r-rt
U: :
,1 1
; r: I
t ¡,;
¡ I :.
I' ,
¡ r: ¡
i /1 ¡:
" '. I I,.
II ¡ t !
II : I
q
~"'..r;:'\v
an"i~ A>r'Jl.·~ ~
an · . SDUW-'--
DaIGII M1~ DIT'E ~
DIST-=r .L04 ~
0JstcIiI0I ~ GIIØW
--~-.. - J -........-----
~~~ ...... ~~...._~_.--....-:--
=.u"'~ L.~ 6d..- ~ ~1~:~~'"=
"--AIII'DII'r. ~ .' , , " -:. f!HUT -L- OF , ~
t
I
I I
1\\-
1 a..
I
1
t ~-
,"
, :
1
1
~
;..
;..
---
.. ." ".,..--:..,,~'"'" .......'. ,- --"'-..,-.,-.----..-...... Cc - "'" ___.. _' _, .. _"~_,,.._ ... '"_''' c c _._ ,_...... ...._. .~ ~...ø~ Q"'. ,_..~.'_,___,_ ,__,,_ c _'___
-
~ C'IIIIIIIJ , I
I ' @ \ ~ :ØH{~f~'ì~ , .-
\ '~ t ----- ~ !
~~H: :~'~ : : '~ Ur--- -~-
I ~ :tttw{ ~~~ - ,: nt:j ,
I
I f,~~:::i:~:~~~ _,: ~
I
I ij
I ~
!
I i
--
I .
I~
.L
~~
t
~
:I~
¡
I
I
I,'
~':' .
I
~ rHttHHttttfW
\IN#ttHj ~
-~..
~~ . ,'&rWf~
~
~~ ,\ ~~
~~~~,
I~,,~~ ~,
,. / .~
~ /, ~ //
~I~~~~~
N
.
N
~
N
.
~
i
I ri i ., I ! ~ ~ ~ ! ~
C II I.. III I I!! I !..II! ~
; 11II ~i i J i i i _ ~ }>. :: I
_I a ;~ ;i~
. M G M..
~ ~ ~ !:~ !:~~
.
;
I
I ~ I I i
I I I I I
Ii
'I
f ~
i ·
I ·
f :
II
~cn
~~
C) ~ ~ I.
('\' chI ~ {
~ ,> , ?b
:t. ¥\ ~
~ ~ ~
(\ t7
:t:i7
¡,. ~
~ ~
~3tf'J
~~~
~ Y\
,,'^ '" (K
l' ($,
o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Finance
Council Meeting Date: 3/24/86
Subject:
Haltom/Richland Chamber Dues
Agenda Number: GN86-16
A statement was received from Haltom/Richland Area Chamber for 1986 dues in the amount of
$5,174.00. This is based on 13¢ per capita and population estimate of 39,800.
Funding Source:
The City Council appropriated sufficient funds in the Promotional Fund for budget year
1985/86.
It is recommended that membership dues for the Haltom/Richland Chamber be paid.
Finance Review
-X-
Acct. Number 15-01-04-4100
~f~u~~able
/r~.~
(11 ~
City Manager
. Finance Director
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
1
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
il
i
I
I
II
HALTOM-RICHLAND AREA CHAMBER
5001 Den"ton Highway
P_O. 80.>< '14095
Haltom City, Texas 76117
Honorable Dan Echols
City of North Richland Hills
730~ NE Loop 820
P . û. 8 0:><: '~8 6 0 9
North Richland Hills, TX 76118
PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN WITH YOUR PAYMENT
HALTOM...RICHLANDAREACHAMBER
I Membership investment for 01/01/86 to 01/01/87
II
{'
I
~lr&lr~[MJ~[K]lr
DATE:01/12;¡/86
ACCOUNT NUMBER: -: '"' 59
AMOUNT DUE: 5'; '74 . Û 0
AMOUNT REMITTED:
.!.:\f\~ 0 U ~! T 0 U E :
5174.CO
*Based on l3¢ per capita for 39,800 population Dec. 31, 1985.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Planning and Development
Department:
Council Meeting Date: 3/24/86
Agenda Number: _.9N 86-17
Subject:
Consideration of Amendments to Ordinance #1080
Zoning Ordinance
Ordinance No. 1337
In working with and reviewing the operations of the process under which changes are
accomplished to the Zoning Ordinance it was noted that certain portions of the required
procedure has been revised by newly adopted sections of the State Enabling Statues. In
order to clarify and to conform with the current State Laws the attached Ordinance
Revision was drafted by the City Attorney and the Planning Director.
The changes proposed are as follows:
ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 28.4
This section previously stated the method of notices required for holding a public
hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission including the timing required, method
of notice determination and measurement procedure.
The proposed revision would require the public hearing but leave the method of notice
procedure to be determined by the State Enabling Statute. This would preclude the City
having one procedure written in its Ordinance and the legislature requiring a different
procedure by a change in the State Statute.
SECTION 28.6
This section stated that "all" cases receiving a final report would be sent to the City
Council.
The City Council's policy has been only those changes which were recommended for
approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission would automatically be heard by the City
Council. The proposed revision would state a time and method for an applicant to appeal
the denial of the Planning and Zoning Commission to the City Council.
SECTION 28.9
This section details the public hearing notice process for the City Council.
The proposed revision would eliminate the requirement for duplicating the publishing of
the Ordinance changing the Zoning.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
~re ~n~er
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
2
I
--
I
SECTION 28.11
This section details the petition procedure for protesting a Zoning change.
I
The proposed revision would allow this section to track current State Law.
of way must be included in area calculations.
Street right
RECOMMENDATION:
I
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the proposed changes to Ordinance
#1080 as contained in Ordinance #1337 be approved.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Page 2 of 2
· '-
I,
Ie
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
Page 13
P & Z Minutes
February 13, 1986
(
12 . AMENDMENT
13. AMENDMENT
ADJOURNMENT
Zoning Commission
(
Consideration of an amendment to
Ordinance #1080, Zoning Ordinance, and
Ordinance #984, Council Rules and
Procedures.
Mr. Schwinger made the motion to
approve this amendment. This motion
was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the
motion carried 4-0.
Consideration of an amendment
Ordinance #984, Council Rules
Procedures.
Ms. Flippo made the mo on to approve
this amendment. The motion was
seconded by Mr. 11 ford and the
motion carri 4-0.
Vice Chairman
Planning & Zoning Commission
I
Ie
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1337
I
WHEREAS, there are certain ambiguities and contradictions
contained in Section 28.4, and 28.9, 28.11 of Ordinance No. 1080 and
when considered in the light of the Statutes of this State governing
zoning, zoning amendments for same; and
I
I
I
WHEREAS, in order to cure such ambiguities, the City
Council, after recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission,
does hereby adopt the terms of this Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the
City of North Richland Hills, Texas that:
1.
Section 28.4 of Ordinance 1080 is repealed and shall
hereafter read as follows:
I
"Section 28.4
The City Planning and Zoning Commission make its report to
the City Council after holding at least one public hearing
on each proposed change in the zoning district boundaries.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall follow the laws of
the State of Texas in the giving of notice in connection
with any proposed public hearing"
I
Ie
2.
I
Section 28.6 of Ordinance No. 1080 is repealed and hereafter
shall read as follows:
I
"Section 28.6
Every proposal receiving a final approval by the Commission
shall be forwarded to the City Council for setting and for
holding a public hearing upon an ordinance dealing with the
report. No change recommended by the Commission shall
become effective until approved by Ordinance passed by the
City Council. Unless appealed to the City Council by
applicant, denial of the Planning and Zoning Commission
shall be final (10) ten days from the date of the action by
the Planning and Zoning Commission."
I
I
I
3.
The last sentence of Section 28.9 of Ordinance No. 1080 is
I
I
Ie
I
repealed.
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
4.
That portion of 28.11 of Ordinance 1080, "excluding any
intervening public street," and is hereby repealed.
5.
If any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid for any reason,
it shall not affect the remaining valid portion.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th day of
~2~i?o - , " Vic
s~y ~-=~y~
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas this day of , 1986.
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney for the City
, 1986
~
APPROVED:
Mayor
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Administration _ Council Meeting Date: 3/24/86
Authorization to Participate with the City of
Ad ingtoQ, in Wastewater Service Rates Study, Agenda Number: GN 86-18
Resolution No. 86-13
SUbject:
On February 24th, 1986 (PW 86-6) the City Council approved participation with the City
of Arlington in the cost of hiring experts to study the rates the City of Fort Worth
is charging other cities for processing and transporting sewer. It has been requested
that Council approval be given in the form of a resolution, rather than a simple
motion. Accordingly, the attached resolution has been prepared.
Recommendation:
Approval of Resolution No. 86-13 is recommended.
~e
I Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Other
.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Avai lable
Department Head Signature
~~
City Manager
, Finance Director
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Paqe 1 of 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
fRtø ølutiøn
No.
86-13
<!titu of N ortl} 1&irl}lanà JI illa
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLA~m HILLS TO
PARTICIPATE WITH THE CITY OF ARLINGTON IN AN ANALYSIS OF THE
COST OF SERVICE OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH WASTEWATER SYSTEM
WHEREAS, changes in the structure of the City of Fort Worth outside
city wholesale wastewater service rates have been proposed; and
WHEREAS, various problems have been raised which should be
considered and studied prior to the implementation of such changes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
North Richland Hills, Texas:
I.
That the City of North Richland Hills hereby makes known its intent
to participate in an economic analysis of the structure of the City of Fort
Worth outside city wholesale wastewater system rates to be procured by the
City of Arlington. This City is hereby authorized to participate in the cost
of such analysis in an amount not to exceed $15,000.00.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of March, 1986.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Finance
Approval of Contract for
Bank-Wire Transfer of Sales Tax
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SUbject:
Council Meeting Date:
3/24/86
Agenda Number:
GN86-19
The current procedures for transferring the City's share of sales tax revenues from the
State Comptroller's Office to the City is by mail. That procedure causes time delays for
mail delivery and interest income earnings loss because of the number of days in transit.
Reed Municipal Services, Incorporated and MBank Austin are offering services to provide
same day wire transfer. Improved interest earnings can be achieved by using the services
which more than offest the cost of the service. A brief tabulation is provided as follow
for actual transfers made by mail for the period
of March 1985 to February 1986:
Month Year
Mar 1985
Apr "
May "
Jun "
Jul "
"
"
"
"
1986
"
Amount of Days Held
Sales Tax By Mail
$189,211 3
136,706 3
309,023 3
180,655 3
177,339 3
328,573 3
204,949 3
179,291 4
452,198 4
178,130 3
180,083 3
470,880 3
Interest Loss R.M.S. and
at 7.75% MBank Charges
$ 120.52 $65.00
87.07 65.00
196.84 95.00
115.07 65.00
112.96 65.00
209.29 95.00
130.54 75.00
152.27 65.00
384.05 100.00
113.46 65.00
114.71 65~00
299.94 100.00
$2,036.72 $920.00
$1,116.72
Net Estimated Earnings Loss
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Finance Review
Acct. Number N/ A
SUffi~U:5z..a~.lable
~ /::11~
, City Manager
. Finance Director
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Paae 1 of ____2_____
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Recommendation:
In order to improve the City's interest earnings, it is recommended that the City enter
into a contract with Reed Municipal Services, Inc. and MBank Austin to provide same day
wire transfer of sales tax revenues to the City of North Richland Hills.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
.
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department: Personnel Council Meeting Date: 3/24/86
_ubject: Ordinance Adopting Section 207(k) of the Fair Labor Agenda Number: GN 86-20
Standards Act. Ordinance No. 1355
The City is required to be in compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act by
April 15, 1986. The initial compliance date of October 15, 1985 was changed by
Congressional action last November. The Act generally states that employees
shall receive overtime pay for hours worked in excess of (40) hours per work week.
However, Section 207(k) of the Act allows firefighters to work (53) hours per
week before overtime is earned provided the City adopts this section of the Act.
Since our firefighters work an average of (56) hours per week, the adoption of
Section 207(k) will minimize the City's cost to comply with the Act.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 1355 adopting
Section 207(k) of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget ~
_Other
~~--~ ~
Department Head ~nature
Acct. Number 01-90-02-1070; 01-90-03-1070
sufficientM~s Available
~< 72L" -.-, ,.
-f2M:/~
I City Manager
. Finance Director
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of 1
·
'.
I
r
r
ORDINANCE NO. 1355
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND
HILLS, TEXAs, THAT:
1.
The City has adopted, and by these presents, does adopt the provisions
of Section 207(k) of the United States Fair Labor Standard Act for all fire-
fighting personnel in the City Fire Department.
2.
A twenty-eight day work period has been, and is hereby, established
for those personnel in the Fire Department who qualify as actual firefighting
personnel, such twenty-eight day period to be effective as of April 12, 1986
at 7:30 o'clock a.m.
3.
Those firefighting personnel falling within the purview of this
ordinance shall receive overtime pay at one and one-half times their normal
rate of pay for hours worked in eXcess of 212 during any twenty-eight day
Work period.
PASSED AND APPROVED this _____day of
, 1986.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Subject:
Schematic Design of Community Center and Library
3/24/86
Council Meeting Date:
GN 86-21
Agenda Number:
Department:
Administration
I
Representatives from Al Komatsu and Associates will be here Monday night for Pre-
Council to make a presentation on the completed schematic design of the Community Center
and Library. The design phase of this project is now complete and before additional
funds are committed for detailed plans and specifications, we need the Council's
approval of the general design, layout and space allocation of the buildings involved.
The plans and specifications must be formally approved by the Council; however, it is
proposed that the schematic design be reviewed in Pre-Council.
Recommendation: Approve schematic design and space allocation.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
_ Other
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
¡(1IlL~
Department Head Signature ' City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
1
Paae 1 of
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Finance
Department:
Presentation of Audited Financial
Statements for F/Y 1984/85
Council Meeting Date:
3/24/86
Subject:
Agenda Number:
GN86-23
The audited financial statements for fiscal year ending September 30, 1985 will be
formally presented to the City Council for their review. Mr. Clyde Womack, partner
with Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co. will make the presentation and answer any questions
concerning the financial statements.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the financial statements be accepted as presented.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other
Acct. Number N/ ft.
SUffiCient,Fu~ ~v~iIable
~ Tr:l"~
)<11{ . _ ~: -
Department Head Signature City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
x
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The City of
North Richland Hills
/"
State of
Comprehensive
Annual Financial Report
September 30, 1985
I
;1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Marie Hinkle
Place 1
Richard Davis
Place 3
Mayor Pro Tem
Dick Fisher
Place 5
Harold Newman
Place 7
Prepared by:
Finance Department
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1985
City Officials
Dan Echols
Mayor
Rodger N. Line
City Manager
Dennis Horvath
Assistant City Manager
Lee Maness
Director of Finance
I
Jim Kenna
Place 2
Virginia Moody
Place 4
Jim Ramsey
Place 6
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
I
I
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1985
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I
I
I
I
Exhibit
Page(s)
INTRODUCTORY SECTION
Title Page
I
Table of Contents
II-V
Transmittal Letter
VI-XI
Organizational Chart
XII
Certificate of Conformance
XIII
I
FINANCIAL SECTION
I
I
Auditors' Report
Combined Financial Statements - Overview ("Liftable"
General Purpose Financial Statements):
I
I
Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and
Account Groups
2-5
Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures
and Changes in Fund Balances - All Govern-
mental Fund Types
2 6-7
I
I
I
I
I
I
Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures
and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and
Actual - General, Special Revenue and Debt
Service Fund Types
3 8-9
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes
in Retained Earnings - Proprietary Fund
Type
4 10
Statement of Changes in Financial Position -
Proprietary Fund Type
5 11
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
12-24
(Continued)
II
Table of Contents, continued
Combining, Individual Fund and Account Group
Financial Statements and Schedules:
Governmental Funds:
General Fund:
Balance Sheet
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and
Actual
Special Revenue Funds:
Combining Balance Sheet
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expendi-
tures and Changes in Fund Balances
Federal Revenue Sharing Fund:
Balance Sheet
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and
Actual
Occupancy Tax Fund:
Balance Sheet
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and
Actual
Parks and Library Fund:
Balance Sheet
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and
Actual
Debt Service Fund:
Balance Sheet
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and
Actual
Capital Projects Funds:
Combining Balance Sheet
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expendi-
tures and Changes in Fund Balances
Proprietary Fund - Water and Sewer Enterprise
Fund:
Balance Sheet
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and
Changes in Retained Earnings
Statement of Changes in Financial Position
III
Schedule/
Statement
Page(s)
A-] 27
A-2 28-30
B-1 33
B-2 34
B-3 35
B-4 36
B-5 37
B-6 38
B-7 39
B-8 40
C-} 43
C-2 44
D-} 47
D-2 48
E-}
5}-52
E-2
E-3
53
54
(Continued)
I
Table of Contents, continued
I
I
General Fixed Assets Account Group:
Schedule of General Fixed Assets - By
Sources
Schedule of General Fixed Assets - By
Function and Activity
Schedule of Changes in General Fixed
Assets - By Function and Activity
I
I
I
STATISTICAL SECTION (Unaudited)
I
Debt Service Requirements to Maturity - General
Obligation Bonds
I
Debt Service Requirements to Maturity - Revenue
Bonds
Summary of Debt Service Requirements to Maturity -
Annual Principal and Interest Requirements
I
General Governmental Expenditures by Function
- Last Ten Fiscal Years
I
General Revenues by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years
I
Property Tax Levies and Collections - Last Ten
Fiscal Years
I
Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable
Property - Last Ten Fiscal Years
I
Property Tax Rates - All Overlapping Governments
(per $100 of assessed value) - Last Ten Fiscal
Years
I
Special Assessment Collections - Last Ten Fiscal
Years
I
Ratio of Net Bonded Debt to Assessed Value and
Net Bonded Debt per Capita - Last Ten Fiscal
Years
I
Computation of Legal Debt Margin - September 30,
1985
I
I
Computation of Overlapping Debt - September 30,
1985
I
IV
Schedule/
Statement
Page(s)
F-1 57
F-2 58-59
F-3 60-61
Table
63
2 64
3 65
4 66
5 68-69
6 70-71
7 72-73
8
74-75
9
76
10 78-79
11 80
12 81
(Continued)
Table of Contents, continued
Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for
General Bonded Debt to Total General Expendi-
tures - Last Ten Fiscal Years
Revenue Bond Coverage - Water and Sewer Bonds -
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Demographic Statistics - Last Ten Fiscal Years
Property Value, Construction and Bank Deposits -
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Principal Taxpayers - September 30, 1985
Miscellaneous Statistics - September 30, 1985
v
Table
Page(s)
13 82
]4 84-85
15 86
16 88-89
1 7 90
18 91-92
I
I
City of Xrth Richland HiUs, Texas
I
I
February 11, 1986
I
I
Honorable Mayor, City Council and City Manager
City of North Richland Hills
North Richland Hills, Texas:
I
I
Submitted herewith is the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1985. In
preparing this report our efforts were concentrated in various areas attempting
to conform to the principles and standards of public financial reporting as
recommended by the Government Finance Officers Association and the Governmental
Accounting Standards Board (GASB). Our intention is to continue to comply with
the guidelines as promulgated by the GASB. In our opinion, this report is in
compliance with all guidelines and restatement publications and is qualified to
be adjudged in conformance.
I
I
I
This report contains balance sheets and statements reflecting revenues,
expenses/expenditures, investments, fixed assets and bonded indebtedness in the
fund classifications used by the City of North Richland Hills. Additionally,
this report contains a statistical section presenting a variety of statistical
information and financial indices for the past ten fiscal periods. Certain
financial tables that appear throughout this report have been consolidated
and/or duplicated in this letter to provide continuity and ready reference to
the reader.
I
I
THE REPORTING ENTITY AND ITS SERVICES
I
This report includes all of the funds and account groups of the City.
It includes all activities over which the City Council exercises oversight
responsibility.
I
Elementary and Secondary education services within the City are provided by
the Birdville Independent School District. The City Council has no oversight
responsibility over the District and, accordingly, financial data for the
District are not included in the combined financial statements in this report.
I
I
The City provides the full range of municipal services contemplated by
statute or charter. This includes public safety (police and fire), sanitation,
health, culture, recreation, public improvements, planning and zoning, and
general administrative services.
I
I
(817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118
VI
FUND STRUCTURE
The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds or account
groups, each of which is considered to be a separate accounting entity. The
operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing
accounts which comprise its assets, liabilities, retained earnings/fund balance,
revenues and expenses/expenditures. The various funds are grouped by type in
the financial statements.
The various funds and account groups presented in this report were created
under the authority of the charter of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas,
as amended up to and including September 30, 1985, and, additionally, by the
authority of the State of Texas as outlined in Vernon's Annotated Civil
Statutes. A description of the funds used by the City and their purpose and the
basis of accounting for transactions can be found in Note ] of the Notes to
Combined Financial Statements.
ACCOUNTING SYSTEM AND BUDGETARY CONTROL
The City's accounting records for the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund are
maintained on an accrual basis whereby revenues and expenses are recorded in
the accounting period in which they are earned or incurred. The remainder of the
City's funds are maintained on the modified accrual basis whereby revenue is
recorded when measurable and available and expenditures are recorded when the
liability is incurred except for interest on general long-term debt.
One of the objectives of the City's financial accounting system is to
provide adequate internal controls. Internal controls are designed to provide
reasonable, but not absolute, assurance regarding the safeguarding of assets
against loss from unauthorized use or disposition and the reliability of
financial records for preparing financial statements and maintaining
accountability for assets. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that
the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived and
the evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgment by
management. We believe that the City's internal controls adequately safeguard
assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial
transactions.
Budgetary control is accomplished by the adoption of an annual operating
budget for the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds and Debt Service Fund.
Detail control is accomplished by maintaining appropriations, encumbrances and
expended balances by line item account within each operating department within
each operating fund. Purchase orders or payments that would result in an over-
expenditure of a line item account are not processed without the approval of the
City Manager.
GENERAL FUND
Revenues earned by the General Fund totaled $7,431,081 in ]985, an increase
of 6% from ]984. The increase in revenues is attributable primarily to a larger
tax base, increased sales tax revenues, and increased building permit revenues.
Total tax revenues which include property tax, city sales tax, mixed beverage tax,
and franchise taxes, increased 9.25% over 1984. Taxes produced 8]% of total
revenues in 1985 compared to 78.9% of total revenues in 1984.
VII
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The amount of revenues from various sources and the increase over last year are
shown in the following tabulation:
Increase
Percent (decrease)
Revenue Source Amount of Total from 1984
Taxes $ 6,022,045 81 .0% $ 509,954
Licenses and permits 703,490 9.5 109,542
Intergovernmental (18,689)
Charges for services 196,553 2.6 25,827
Fines 175,946 2.4 ( 1 ,538)
Miscellaneous 333,047 4.5 (183,125)
Total $ 7 .431 .081 100.0% $ 441.971
The basic growth indicator of the City is the building permit values for
the fiscal years. The following tabulation reflects the building permit values
by classification for the past three years.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1985 1984 1983
Value Value Value
Classification (OOO's) Number (ODD's) Number (OOO's) Number
Residential $ 4 7 , 960 566 $ 49,230 630 $ 36,802 518
Duplex 12,968 130 8,482 99 6,911 103
Apartments 11 ,320 9 17,511 31 31 ,025 9
Commercial 37,803 186 22,775 176 24,899 138
Miscellaneous 2,468 209 2,480 212 3,502 214
Totals $ 112.519 1 . ] 00 $ 100.478 1 . 148 $ 103.139 m
Assessed property tax valuations of approximately $1,033,000,000 represented a
49.6% increase over 1984. The significant increases are due to tremendous growth
and the reappraisal of all properties by Tarrant Appraisal District.
General Fund expenditures were $7,633,168, a 28.8% increase over 1984. The
following tabulation reflects these expenditures compared to the original budget
appropriations by categories of operations.
I
I
I
I
Function Budget Actual
General government $ 1,938,028 1,962,262
Public safety 3,843,777 3,795,084
Culture and recreation 688,025 657 , 180
Public works 1,204,037 1 ,218,642
Total expenditures $ 7.673.867 7.633.168
Variance -
Favorable
(24,234)
48,693
30,845
(14,605)
40.699
VIII
General Fund's equity at September 30, 1985 was $1,776,644, a $672,087
decrease from September 30, 1984. The decrease is due primarily to a transfer
of monies (approved by City Council in June 1985) to the Capital Projects Fund
to partially finance a new municipal complex.
DEBT ADMINISTRATION
General obligation bonds, which are directly tax supported, totaled
$9,130,000 at September 30, 1985. The ratio of net bonded debt to assessed
valuation and net bonded debt per capita are useful indicators of the City's
debt position to municipal management, citizens, and investors. These data for
the City at September 30, 1985 were as follows:
Ratio of Net Net Bonded
Net Bonded Bonded Debt to Debt per
Debt Assessed Value Capita
$ 7..069..767 ~ 193.69
Revenue bonds, which are secured by the net revenues of the Water and Sewer
Enterprise Fund, totaled $14,410,000 at September 30, 1985. Revenue bond
coverage (i.e., net revenues available for debt service divided by debt service
requirements) for 1985 was 2.75.
The City's bonds are currently rated by Moody's Investor Services and Stan-
dard & Poor's as follows:
Moody's
Standard & Poor's
General Obligation Bonds
Revenue Bonds
"A"
"A+ "
"A+"
"A"
CASH MANAGEMENT
The City has designated Interfirst Bank Richland N.A. in North Richland
Hills as the City depository on the basis of a bid to pay interest on idle funds
at a variable (floating) rate as related to either the 13-week or 26-week
Treasury Bill Coupon Equivalent Rate, whichever is greater. The average yield
on investments was 8.8% for 1985, as compared to 10.23% for 1984.
EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
The City participates in the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS), an
agency operated by the State of Texas. Employees of local governmental entities
who participate in TMRS contribute a fixed percentage of their gross pay,
currently 5%. For 1985, the City contributed to employees' retirement at a rate
of ]-1/2 to 1, which required a 3% contribution by the City.
TMRS participants are immediately vested in those funds they contribute plus
allocated earnings thereon. Participants are vested in the remainder of their
account (i.e., employer contributions plus allocated earnings thereon) after ten
years of credited participation. If participants withdraw from TMRS prior to ten
years of credited participation, they may withdraw from TMRS those funds they
contributed plus earnings thereon, but forfeit their employers' contributions and
related earnings. Each employer's contribution for current requirements is offset
by the amount of such forfeitures. City contributions for 1985 were made by the
General Fund ($147,000) and the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund ($31,000).
IX
I
I
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
I
Proceeds from general obligation bonds are accounted for in Capital Pro-
jects Funds until the related construction projects are completed. Completed pro-
jects and construction in progress at year end are capitalized in the General Fixed
Assets Account Group. During ]985, projects costing $1,643,000 were completed.
Projects which were not complete at September 30, 1985 totaled $1,803,911.
I
Capital Projects Funds assets at September 30, 1985 consisted primarily of
$6,974,644 in cash and investments.
I
I
GENERAL FIXED ASSETS
I
The general fixed assets of the City are those fixed assets used to pro-
vide services of governmental functions and exclude fixed assets of the Water
and Sewer Enterprise Fund. As of September 30, 1985, general fixed assets
amounted to $24,257,844. This amount represents the actual cost ~f these
assets regardless of date of purchase or current value. Current value of
these assets is estimated to be considerably more than the recorded costs.
Depreciation of general fixed assets is not recognized in the City's ac-
counting system.
I
WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
I
The City's Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund continued to grow in size and
number of customers as a direct result of the large amount of building activity
during 1985. The number of water customers increased from 16,693 in 1984 to
]7,943 in 1985. The total amount of water sold during 1985 was approximately
365 million cubic feet (297 million in 1984). For the past ten fiscal years,
the coverage factor for the Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds has exceeded 1.8.
The following tabulation for the previous three years reflects the stability
of the utility system:
I
I
I
1985 1984 1983
Gross revenues $ 9,612,202 8,854,2]8 7,335,616
Operating expenses
(excluding depreciation) 5,423,482 4,482,779 3,672,160
Net revenue available for
debt service $ 4 . 188 .720 4.371.439 3.663.456
Annual debt service $ 1.523.243 1.293.925 1.031.264
Coverage 1.:12. ~ l:1l
INDEPENDENT AUDIT
I
I
I
I
I
The City Charter requires an annual audit of the books of accounts,
financial records, and transactions of all administrative departments of the
City by independent certified public accountants selected by the City Council.
This requirement has been complied with and the auditors' report has been
included in this report.
I
I
x
CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMANCE
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada
(GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting to the City
of North Richland Hills, Texas for its comprehensive annual financial report for
the year ended September 30, ]984.
In order to be awarded a Certificate of Conformance, a governmental unit
must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual
financial report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports
must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal
requirements.
A Certificate of Conformance is valid for a period of one·year only. We
believe our current report continues to conform to Certificate of Conformance
Program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligi-
bility for another certificate.
PROSPECTS FOR FUTURE YEARS
The Ci ty is experiencing rapid growth in both resi.dential and commercial de-
velopment. To meet these needs for street, drainage, public safety, and recre-
ational/cultural improvements, the City Council and Staff put together a major five
year capital improvement program. The capital improvement program consists primarily
of street improvements, flood control projects, public safety facilities and a li-
brary/recreation center. During September ]985, the citizens of North Richland
Hills overwhelmingly approved bond propositions totaling $40,000,000 despite the
prospect of property taxes increasing as much as $.05 per $100 assessed value over
the next five years.
The City's recent rapid growth has generated a larger property tax base that
has had a major impact on other revenue sources of the City, primarily sales taxes.
Recent construction in the City such as expansion of the North Hills Mall, opening
of a Walmart store, and completion of a significant apartment complex, along with re-
vision of the state sales tax law to include more services and products, indicate
that sales and property taxes should continue to increase for several years.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The preparation of this report could not be accomplished on a timely basis
without the efficient and dedicated endeavors of the entire staff of the Finance
Department and our independent auditors. I would like to express my sincere
appreciation to all employees who contributed to the preparation. Additionally,
I would also like to thank the Mayor, City Council, and the City Manager for
their support in planning and conducting the financial operations of the City
in a responsible and progressive manner.
Respectfully Submitted,
. L} ~ '*-" _ . ..... _ .-/
~ '/1 - _
Lee Maness
Director of Finance
XI
I
Q-
ZZ
~.w
j~
Z~
Z~
C >
¡~
I
I
I
...
~æ
;;¡a
§~
2
I
I
>-
~
:1
~O
t:
e
I
tn
~
=0
:....
cate
ZC
C%
..&u
:....
uC
-z
~o
:-
....!¡
CCN
0-
zZ
a.¡..c
oi
>0
t:
CJ
:
...
>-<-'
=~
Ue
2
I
<-'rn
!~
~...
:)z
rn-
Z<-'
OZ
u'"
I
I
...
ü
~z
~ð
eu
2>-
Ü
I
I
I
~
::t~
~=
u",
en
I
I
~
=
~~
5~
~
en
I
I
rn
Z
<i!~
i~
c-
02
as
I
I
XII
~~:
-:~
~.-~
œ:OZ
0'-C
¡.-2
-~~
!c=
c CJ
cc
z~
eC
_z
",C
~2
rn~
e...
J
~
=
c
~
~
u
z
C
Z
~
~
U
::¡
~
~
%
::
i!
C'"
ene
!~
cU
~~
4" '"
z;n~~
~~» ...
...~cc:=>~
~~~~...~
¡~~¡¡~
!:*~c!
!a!!U~
ee:tu
~~
;",)...
~
>
~~:
Q !~~¡
~ ::~...
... =~Q=
:-~;:: :
- s~~:
ši~;
...
:
~ æ ...
Q .-~! Z~
! !Zrn ë~
~ o~c 2~
... ue<JJC~~
~_~%:~~zrn
~ -~cc: S¡
z !ii ~~
~ 2 1M iQ
~ U
:!
u_
z>~~~
g~~i~
~~:~!
~;:~IU
!~~~i
!cnz--
cii§5
21
~U
Z
OZIMen
;:Ouz
e~z2
iXrnc.-
~~Su
-~œt
!Q.2rn
!ie!
e
Q
Z
:;)
~
~
~
;:
:)
zz(/)
20z
-=0
¡~.:
æ..~
~ðt
õUo
:=Q
~i~
eIM-
~<n"'-
Q !iæ
z _...
æ ~iZ<n
... ~8~:
~-!! ~ '" ~
~ Z-..~;
Z i"'->
1M Qcæ
<-' c!cn
:~
I.W(.)
...Z
ze
~z
u'"
z-
21
_c
C2
~!
Uc
~Q,.
Certificate
of
Conformance
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
City of
North Richland Hills, Texas
FQr its Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report
for the Fiscal Year Ended
September 30. 1984
A CertifIcate of Conformance In FinancIal ReportIng is
presented by the Government Finance OffIcers ASSocIatIon
of the United States and Canada to governmental unIts
and public employee retirement systems \Ai'hose comprehensIve
annual financIal reports (CAFR's) are Judged to substantlalh,,'
conform to program standards
~-77~
U P';esldent
jJ#?/~
Executive Director
XIII
II
I
r;;1 PEAT
I ~ MARWICK
Peat, ~larwick, Mitchell & Co.
Certified Public ,\ccountants
2300 First City Bank Tower
201 :vtain Strçet
Fort \Vorth. Tçxas 76102
I
I
The Honorable Members of City Council
City of North Richland Hills, Texas:
I
We have examined the combined financial statements of the City of North Richland
Hills, Texas as of and for the year ended September 30, 1985, as listed in the
accompanying table of contents. Our ~xamination was made in accordance with gen-
erally accepted auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of the
accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered neces-
sary in the circumstances.
I
I
I
In our opinion, the aforementioned combined financial statements present fairly
the financial position of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas at September 30,
19~5 and the results of its operations and the changes in financial position of
its proprietary fund type for the year then ended, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles applied on a basis consistent with that of the
preceding year.
I
I
Our examination was made for the purpose of forming an oplnlon on the combined
financial statements taken as a whole. The combining, individual fund, and ac-
count group financial statements and schedules listed in the table of contents
are presented for purposes of additional analysis, they are not a required part
of the combined financial statements of the City of ~orth Richland Hills, Texas
and, accordingly, our opinion does not relate to the fairness of presentation
of the financial position and results of operation or such funds. This infor-
mation has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the examination
of the combined financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the combined financial statements taken as
a whole.
I
I
I
Þ-u:t.~~ )~~ ~~I
I
November 26, 1985, except as to note la,
which is as of December 17, 1985
I
I
I
I
I
1
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups
September 30, 1985
with comparative totals for September 30, 1984
Assets and Other
Debits
Cash and investments, at cost
Receivables (net, where applicable,
of allowances for estimated
uncollectible amounts of $52,572):
Accounts
Taxes (note 2)
Accrued interest
Special assessments (note 3)
Due from other fund
Due from other governments
Inventories, at cost
Restricted assets:
Cash and investments, at cost
Accrued interest receivable
Property, plant and equipment (net,
where applicable, of accumulated
depreciation) (note 4)
Deferred charges (net of accumulated
amortization)
Amount available in debt service fund
Amount to be provided for retirement
of general long-term debt
Total assets and other
debits
General
Fund
$ 2,109,548
388,474
44,947
$ 2.542.969
2
Governmental Fund Types
Special Debt
Revenue Service
Funds Fund
120,576 '2,021,475
14,098
7,002
38,758
58,775
200.451 2.060.233
Capital
Projects
Funds
6,974,644
131,847
192,709
7.299.200
I
Exhibit 1
I
I
I Proprietary
Fund Type Account Groups
Water and Sewer General General Totals
I Enterprise Fixed Long-term (Memorandum Only)
Fund Assets Debt 1985 1984
I 4,915,235 16,141,478 ·16,325,509
I 1,173,144 1,173,144 1,234,881
402,572 347,123
I 117,266 339,820 247,861
192,709 297,337
I 1,100
58,775 178,161
I 61,475 61,475 65,964
I 7,451,512 7,451,512 8,886,836
95,178 95,178 149,736
I 27,150,144 24,257,844 51,407,988 43,169,932
I 71,681 71,681 79,267
I 2,060,233 2,060,233 1,815,964
I 7,127,166 7,127,166 8,041,133
41.035.635 24.257.844 9.187.399 86.583.731 80.840.804
I
I
(Continued)
I
I 3
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups~ Continued
Liabilities
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities (note 5)
Retainage payable
Deposits and other liabilities
Due to other fund
Payable from restricted assets:
Construction contracts payable
Retainage payable
Accrued revenue bond interest
Current portion of revenue bonds
payable (note 5)
Customers' deposits
Developers' deposits
General obligation bonds payable
(notes 5 and 10)
Revenue bonds payable (note 5)
Deferred revenue (notes 2 and 3)
Total liabilities
Fund Equity
Contributed capital
Investment in general fixed assets
Retained earnings:
Reserved, principally for
revenue bond principal and
interest
Unreserved
Fund balances:
Reserved for encumbrances
Reserved for debt service
Unreserved - undesignated
Total retained earnings/
fund balances
Total fund equity
Commitments and contingent lia-
bilities (notes 4, 7 and 9)
Total liabilities and
fund equity
Governmental Fund Types
Special Debt
General Revenue Service
Fund Funds Fund
$
82,843
516,945
416
416
89,092
110,943
200,035
200,035
See accompanying notes to combined financial statements.
200.451
12,290
154t247
766,325
27,622
1,749,022
1,776,644
1,776,644
$ 2.542.969
4
2,060,233
2,060,233
2,060,233
2.060.233
Capital
Projects
Funds
312,812
89,693
519,574
144t052
1t066,131
2,311,465
3,921,604
6,233,069
6,233,069
7.299.200
I
Exhibit I, Continu@d
I
I
I Proprietary
Fund Type Account Groups
I Water and Sewer General General Totals
Enterprise Fixed Long-term (Memorandum Only)
Fund Assets Debt 1985 1984
I 508,411 904,482 679,504
110,422 57,399 684,766 468,300
89,693 105,171
I 5,405 537,269 393,289
1,100
I 116,533 116,533 9,280
70,788 70,788 59,940
91,305 91 ,305 115,478
I 30,833 30,833 29,583
566,757 566,757 482,064
46,343 46,343 30,704
I 9,130,000 9,130,000 9,810,000
14,379,167 14,379,167 14,735,417
I 298,299 113,263
15,925,964 9,187,399 26,946,235 27,033,093
I,
11,612,574 11,612,574 9,381,654
I 24,257,844 24,257,844 20,713,471
I 1,583,067 1,583,067 1,423,685
11,914,030 11,914,030 10,172,394
I 2,428,179 630,689
2,060,233 1,815,964
5,781,569 9,669,854
I 13,497,097 23,767,078 23,712,586
25,109,671 24,257,844 59,637,496 53,807,711
I
41.035.635 24.257.844 9.187.399 86.583.731 80.840.804
I
I 5
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes
in Fund Balances - All Governmental Fund Types
Year ended September 30, 1985
with comparative totals for year ended September 30, 1984
Revenues:
Taxes (note 2)
Licenses and permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Fines
Contributions
Special assessments (note 3)
Miscellaneous
Total revenues
Expenditures:
Current:
General government
Public safety
Culture and recreation
Public works
Capital projects
Debt service:
Redemption of serial bonds
Interest and fiscal agent charges
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over expendi-
tures
Other financing sources (uses):
Operating transfers in (note 8)
Operating transfers out (note 8)
Loss on litigation settlement
Total other financing
sources (uses) - net
Excess (deficiency) of rev-
enues and other sources
over expenditures and
other uses
Fund balances at beginning of year
Fund balances at end of year
General
Fund
$ 6,022,045
703,490
196,553
175,946
333,047
7,431,081
1,962,262
3,795,084
657,180
1,218,642
7,633,168
(202,087)
Special
Revenue
Funds
75,223
236,911
50,845
57,677
420,656
29,697
201,631
231,328
189,328
456,000
(926,000) (231,000)
(470,000) (231,000)
(672,087) (41,672)
2,448,731
$ 1.776.644
241,707
200.035
See accompanying notes to combined financial statements.
6
Debt
Service
Fund
1,525,042
218,082
1,743,124
Capital
Projects
Funds
760,815
760,815
3,200,851
680,000
818,855
1,49~,855 3,200,851
244,269 (2,440,036)
1,125,000
(62,000)
1,063,000
244,269 (1,377,036)
1,815,964
2.060.233
7,610,105
6.233.069
I
Exhibit 2
I
I
I
Totals
I (Memorandum Only)
1985 1984
I 7,622,310 7,095,236
703,490 593,948
236,911 758,327
I 196,553 170,726
175,946 177,484
50,845 232,151
162,811
I 1,369,621 1,466,674
10,355,676 10,657,357
I 1,962,262 1,464,369
3,824,781 3,202,724
858,811 546,098
I 1,218,642 1,018,477
3,200,851 3,296,911
I 680,000 670,000
818,855 877,301
12,564,202 11,075,880
I (2,208,526) (418,523)
I 1 ,581,000 1,556,339
(1,219,000) (1,106,339)
(62,568)
I 362,000 387,432
I (1,846,526) (31,091)
I 12,116,507 12,147,598
10.269.981 12.116.507
I
I
I 7
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes
in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual - General, Special Revenue
and Debt Service Fund Types
Year ended September 30, 1985
Revenues:
Taxes
Licenses and permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for services
Fines
Contributions
Miscellaneous
Total revenues
Expenditures:
Curren t:
General government
Public safety
Culture and recreation
Public works
Debt service:
Redemption of serial bonds
Interest and fiscal agent
charges
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over expendi-
tures
Other financing sources (uses):
Operating transfers in (note 8)
Operating transfers out (note 8)
Total other financing
sources (uses) - net
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues and other
sources over expendi-
tures and other uses
Fund balances at beginning of year
Fund balances at end of year
General Fund
Budget
Actual
$ 6,105,517
489,250
6,022,045
703,490
163,500
192,100
196,553
175,946
267,500
7,217,867
333,047
7,431,081
1,938,028
3,843,777
688,025
1,204,037
1,962,262
3,795,084
657 , 180
1,218,642
7,673,867
7,633,168
(456,000)
(202,087)
456,000
456,000
(926,000)
(470,000)
456,000
$
(672,087)
2,448,731
$ 1. 776 .644
See accompanying notes to combined financial statements.
8
Variance -
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
(83,472)
2]4,240
33,053
( 16, 154 )
65,547
213,214
(24,234)
48,693
30,845
(14,605)
40,699
253,913
(926,000)
(926,000)
(672.087)
I
Exhibit 3
I
I
I Special Revenue Funds Debt Service Fund
Variance - Variance -
I Favorable Favorable
Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Budget Actual (Unfavorable)
I 60,000 75,223 15,223 1 , 49 2 , SO 4 1 , 5 2 5 , 04 2 32,538
245,000 236,911 (8,089)
I
50,000 50,845 845
I 57,677 57,677 218,082 218,082
355,000 420,656 65,656 1,492,504 1,743,124 250,620
I
120,000 29,697 90,303
I 200 , 500 201 ,631 (1,131)
I 680,000 680,000
813,996 818,855 (4,859)
320,500 231,328 89,172 1,493,996 1 ,498,855 (4,859)
I
34,500 189,328 154,828 (1 ,492) 244,269 245,761
I
I (206,000) (231,000) (25,000)
(206,000) (231,000) (25,000)
I
(171 ,500) (41,672) 129,828 _(1,492) 244,269 245..761
I 241,707 ] ,815,964
I 200.035 2,060.233
I
I 9
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in
Retained Earnings - Proprietary Fund Type
Year ended September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for year ended September 30, 1984
Exhibit 4
Water and Sewer
Enterprise Fund
1985 1984
Operating revenues:
Water and sewer service
Water and sewer connections
Sewer transportation
Service charges
Inspection fees
Total operating revenues
$ 7,693,569
324,023
179,272
75,113
95,889
8,367,866
Operating expenses:
Contractual services (note 7)
Personal services
Repairs and maintenance
Supplies
Depreciation
Franchise fee
Total operating expenses
Operating income
4,060,809
1,002,510
242,443
79,905
641 ,552
37,815
6,065,034
2,302,832
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
Interest on investments
Interest and fiscal agent charges
Gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets
Other
1,244,336
(1,168,243)
(6,200)
(109,707)
(39,814)
2,263,018
Total nonoperating expenses
Income before operating transfers
Operating transfers in
Operating transfers out (note 8)
Net income
88,000
(450,000)
1,901,018
Retained earnings at beginning of year
11,596,079
$ 13.497.097
Retained earnings at end of year
See accompanying notes to combined financial statements.
10
7,014,907
487,999
155,053
64,152
115,753
7,837,864
3,282,391
891 , 183
21],364
64,035
580,837
33,806
5,063,6]6
2,774,248
],0]6,354
( 1 ,003, 925 )
15,500
(44,237)
(16,308)
2,757,940
(450,000)
2,307,940
9,288,139
11.596.079
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I
I
Statement of Changes in Financial Position -
Proprietary Fund Type
Year ended September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for year ended September 30, 1984
Exhibit 5
Water and Sewer
Enterprise Fund
1985 1984
I
I
I
Sources of working capital:
Net income
Items that did not use (provide) working
capital:
Depreciation
Amortization
Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets
Total working capital provided
from operations
Proceeds from sale of revenue bonds
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets
Contributions
Increase in current liabilities payable
from restricted assets
Decrease in restricted assets
Decrease in deferred charges
$ 1, 90 1 , ° 18
641,552
4,086
6,200
2,552,856
I
I
2,550
2,230,920
195,510
1,489,882
3,500
$ 6,475,218
I
I
Uses of working capital:
Additions to property, plant and equipment
Decrease in revenue bonds payable
Increase in restricted assets
Increase in deferred charges
Decrease in current liabilities payable
from restricted assets
Net increase in working capital
$ 5,343,985
370,000
I
I
761,233
$ 6.475.218
$ 911,554
(61,737)
64,497
(4,489)
909,825
]3,750
100,201
34,641
148,592
$ 761.233
Changes in components of working capital:
Increase (decrease) in current assets:
Cash and investments
Accounts receivable - net
Accrued interest receivable
Inventories
I
I
I
I
I
I
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities:
Current portion of revenue bonds payable
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Other current liabilities
Due to other funds
Net increase in working capital
See accompanying notes to combined financial statements.
11
2,307,940
580,837
3,052
(15,500)
2,876,329
2,000,000
18,000
1,406,957
6,301,286
2,317,176
355,000
2 ,008 , 1 94
28,351
50,522
1,542,043
6.301.286
1,203,577
202,668
45,598
20,510
1,472,353
59,584
(93,236)
13,912
(48,985)
(965)
(69,690)
1.542.043
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
September 30, 1985
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The City of North Richland Hills Home Rule Charter was adopted by the voters
at an election held on November 3, 1964. The City operates under a Council-
Manager form of government.
The combined financial statements of the City include all government activi-
ties, organizations, and functions for which the City exercises oversight
responsibility. Oversight responsibility is derived from a governmental
unit's power and includes, but is not limited to: financial interdependency,
selection of governing authority, designation of management, ability to sig-
nificantly influence operations and accountability for fiscal matters. These
criteria are consistent with those set forth in National Council on Gov-
ernmental Accounting Statement No.3, "Defining the Governmental Reporting
Entity", and Interpretation No.7, thereof. The City's major operations
include police and fire protection, parks, library and recreation, public
works and general and administrative services. .In addition, the City owns
and operates a water and sewer system. The following entities are not in-
cluded in the combined financial statements because they do not meet any of
the above criteria:
Birdville and Keller Independent School Districts - provide educa-
tion services;
Tarrant County Junior College - provides education services;
Tarrant County Hospital District and private institutions - provides
health care and hospital services; and
Texas Municipal Retirement System - provides retirement benefits to
City employees (note 6).
The accounting policies of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas conform
to generally accepted accounting principles as applicable to governmental
units. The following is a summary of the more significant of such policies:
(a) Basis of Presentation - Fund Accounting
The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds or
account groups, each of which is considered to be a separate
accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted
for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts which com-
prise its assets, liabilities, retained earnings/fund balance,
revenues and expenses/expenditures. The various funds are
grouped by type in the combined financial statements. The
following fund types and account groups are used by the City:
(Continued)
1 2
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
I
GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES
I
I
Governmental Funds are those through which most governmental
functions of the City are financed. The acquisition, use,
and balances of the City's expendable financial resources
and the related liabilities (except those accounted for in
the proprietary fund type) are accounted for through govern-
mental funds. The measurement focus is upon determination of
changes in financial position, rather than upon net income
determination. The following are the City's gov~rnmental
funds:
I
I
General Fund - The General Fund is the general operating fund of
the City. It is used to account for all financial resources
except those required to be accounted for in another fund.
I
Special Revenue Funds - Special Revenue Funds are used to account
for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally
restricted to expenditures for specified purposes.
I
Debt Service Fund - The Debt Service Fund is used to account for
the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, general
long-term debt principal, interest, and related costs.
I
I
Capital Projects Funds - Capital Projects Funds are used to ac-
count for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or
construction of major capital facilities (other than those fi-
nanced by the proprietary fund type). Financing is provided
primarily by the sale of general obligation bonds. Certain
projects are partially financed by special assessments.
I
PROPRIETARY FUND TYPE
I
Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund - The Water and Sewer Enterprise
Fund is used to account for operations (a) that are financed and
operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises -
where the intent of the governing body is that the costs (expenses,
including depreciation) of providing goods or services to the
general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered
primarily through user charges; or (b) where the governing body
has decided that periodic determination of revenues earned, ex-
penses incurred, and/or net income is appropriate for capital
maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability,
or other purposes.
I
I
I
ACCOUNT GROUPS
I
Account groups are used to establish accounting control and ac-
countability for the City's general fixed assets and general
long-term debt. The following are the City's account groups:
I
(Continued)
I
13
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
General Fixed Assets Account Group - This account group is
established to account for all fixed assets of the City, other
than those accounted for in the proprietary fund type.
General Long-Term Debt Account Group - This account group is
established to account for all long-term debt of the City except
that accounted for in the proprietary fund type.
(b) Basis of Accounting
The modified accrual basis of accounting is followed by the govern-
mental fund types. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting,
revenues are recorded when susceptible to accrual, i.e., both
measurable and available. Available means collectible within the
current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabil-
ities of the current period. Expenditures, other than interest on
general long-term debt are recorded when the liability is incurred,
if measurable. Interest on general long-term debt is recorded when
due.
In applying the susceptible to accrual concept to intergovernmental
revenues, the legal and contractual requirements of the individual
programs are used as guidance. There are essentially two types of
these revenues. In one, monies must be expended on the specific
purpose or project before any amounts will be paid to the City;
therefore, revenues are recognized based upon the expenditures
recorded. In the other, monies are virtually unrestricted as to
purpose of expenditure and nearly irrevocable, i.e., revocable only
for failure to comply with prescribed compliance requirements.
These resources are reflected as revenues at the time of receipt
or earlier if the susceptible to accrual criteria are met.
Property tax, sales tax, developer contribution and special assessment
revenues are recognized under the susceptible to accrual concept.
Franchise taxes, licenses and permits, charges for services, fines,
and miscellaneous revenues (except earnings on investments) are
recorded as revenues when received in cash because they are gener-
ally not measurable until actually received. Investment earnings
are recorded as earned since they are measurable and available.
The accrual basis of accounting is utilized by the proprietary fund
type.
(c) Budgetary Data
The City Council follows these procedures in establishing budgetary
data reflected in the financial statements:
(1) Prior to September 1, the City Manager submits to the City
Council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year
commencing the following October 1. The operating budget
includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing
them.
(Continued)
14
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
I
(2) Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayers comments.
I
(3) Prior to September 30, the budget is legally enacted through
passage of an ordinance.
I
(4) The City Manager is authorized to transfer budgeted amounts
between departments within any fund; however, any revisions
that alter the total expenditures of any fund must be ap-
proved by the City Council, after public hearings.
I
I
(5) Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management
control device during the year for the General Fund, Special
Revenue Funds and Debt Service Fund. Budgetary control is
maintained at the function level.
I
(6) Budgets for the General, Special Revenue, and Debt Service
Funds are adopted on a basis consistent with generally ac-
cepted accounting principles. Budgeted amounts are as
originally adopted by the City Council on August 27,
]984 for the 1984-]985 budget. There were no individual
amendments to the original appropriations. Such appropria-
tions lapse at year end.
1
1
(7) Budgetary data for the Capital Projects Funds have not been
presented in the accompanying combined financial statements
as such funds are budgeted over the life of the respective
project and not on an annual basis. Accordingly, formal
budgetary integration of the Capital Projects Funds is not
employed and comparison of actual results of operations to
budgetary data for such funds is not presented.
1
I·
(d) Encumbrances
1
Encumbrance accounting, under which purchase orders, contracts, and
other commitments for the expenditure of funds are recorded in
order to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation, is
employed in governmental funds. Encumbrances are reported as re-
servations of fund balances because they do not constitute expendi-
tures or liabilities.
1
I
(e) Cash and Investments
1
Substantially all operating cash and investments are maintained in
consolidated cash and investment accounts. Interest income re-
lating to consolidated investments is allocated to the individual
funds monthly based on the fund's pro rata share of total consoli-
dated cash and investments. Consolidated investments, principally
certificates of deposit, are stated at cost, which approximates
market.
I
I
(Continued)
I
]5
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(f) Inventories
Inventories in the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund are valued at the
lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.
(g) Property, Plant and Equipment -
Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund
Property, plant and equipment owned by the Water and Sewer Enter-
prise Fund is stated at cost or estimated fair market value at
the date contributed. Depreciation has been provided on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
The estimated useful lives are as follows:
Building and improvements
Utility plant in service
Machinery and equipment
30 years
33 50 years
3 - 10 years
Capitalization of interest related to assets constructed by the Water
and Sewer Enterprise Fund during the year ended September 30, 1985 was
not material and, therefore, was not recorded in the accompanying com-
bined financial statements.
(h) General Fixed Assets
General fixed assets have been acquired for general governmental
purposes. Assets purchased are recorded as expenditures in the
General Fund, Capital Projects Funds, or Special Revenue Funds,
and capitalized at cost in the General Fixed Assets Account
Group. In the case of gifts or contributions, such assets are
recorded in the General Fixed Assets Account Group at estimated
fair market value at the time received.
Generally, fixed assets contributed by subdividers or other con-
tractors consisting of certain improvements other than buildings,
including roads, bridges, curbs and gutters, streets and sidewalks,
drainage systems, and lighting systems, have not been capitalized.
Such assets normally are immovable and of value only to the City;
therefore, the purpose of stewardship for these items is satisfied
without recording these assets.
No depreciation has been provided on general fixed assets, and no
interest has been capitalized.
(i) Deferred Charges - Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund
Deferred charges consist of expenses incurred in connection with
the issuance of certain outstanding revenue bonds. Such charges
are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the re-
spective bonds.
(Continued)
16
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
I
(j) Vacation and Sick Pay
I
City employees are granted vacation and sick pay in varying amounts.
In the event of termination, an employee is reimbursed for all ac-
cumulated unused vacation. No reimbursement is made for accumu-
lated unused sick leave upon termination of employment.
I
I
I
General Fund vacation pay is accrued as vested. The current portion
($183,283) of this liability at September 30, 1985 is included in
General Fund accrued liabilities in the accompanying combined balance
sheet. The long-term portion ($57,399) is included in the General
Long-term Debt Account Group. General Fund sick pay is recorded
when paid.
I
Vacation pay is accrued as vested in the Water and Sewer Enterprise
Fund. Accumulated unpaid vested vacation pay at September 30, 1985
for the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund (approximately $42,000) is
included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying combined balance
sheet. Sick pay is recorded when paid.
I
(k) Reserves
I
Retained earnings have been reserved for the excess of restricted
assets over related liabilities except for the Revenue Bond Con-
struction accounts which do not require a reservation of retained
earnings.
I
(1) Transactions between Funds
I
Residual equity transfers between funds are reported as changes to
fund balances of governmental funds and contributed capital of the
proprietary fund. All other transfers between funds are treated
as operating transfers and are included in the results of operations
of both governmental and proprietary funds.
I
(m)
Unbilled Charges
I
Unbilled utility service charges of the Water and Sewer Enterprise
Fund at year end are estimated and recorded as receivables, net of
estimated uncollectibles.
I
(n) Comparative Data
I
Comparative data for the prior year have been presented in the accom-
panying combined financial statements in order to provide an under-
standing of changes in the City's financial position and operations.
However, complete comparative data (i.e., presentation of prior
year totals by fund type in each of the statements) have not been
presented since their inclusion would make the statements unduly
complex and difficult to read. Certain comparative data have been
reclassified to conform to the 1985 presentation.
I
I
I
(Continued)
1 7
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(0) Total Columns on Combined Statements
Total columns on the Combined Statements are captioned "Memorandum
Only" to indicate that they are presented only to facilitate fi-
nancial analysis. Data in these columns do not present financial
position, results of operations, or changes in financial position
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Neither is such data comparable to a consolidation. Interfund
eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data.
(2) Property Tax
The City's property tax is levied each October 1 on the assessed value
listed as of the prior January 1 for all real property and certain
personal property located in the City. The assessed value, net of
exemptions, upon which the fiscal 1985 levy was based was approxi-
mately $1,033,000,000.
Property taxes are limited by the Texas Constitution to $2.50 per $100
of assessed valuation and by City Charter to $1.50 per $100 valuation.
The combined tax rate to finance general governmental service and debt
service for the year ended September 30, 1985 was $.345 per $100 of
assessed valuation.
Property taxes attach as an enforceable lien on property as of January
] following the levy date. Taxes are due by January 31 following the
levy date. Current tax collections for the year ended September 30,
1985 were 97.3% of the tax levy. Property taxes receivable at Sep-
tember 30, 1985 were $180,033.
Property taxes levied for ]985 are recorded as receivables, net of esti-
mated uncollectibles. The net receivables collected during 1985 and
those considered "available" at September 30, 1985 (i.e., property taxes
collected within 60 days of year end) are recognized as revenues in ]985.
Prior year levies are recorded using these same principles. The remaining
receivables are reflected as deferred revenue.
The appraisal of property within the City is the responsibility of a
county-wide Appraisal District as required by legislation passed by
the Texas Legislature. The Appraisal District is required under such
legislation to assess all property within the Appraisal District on the
basis of 100% of its appraised value and is prohibited from applying
any assessment ratios. The value of property within the Appraisal
District must be reviewed every five years; however, the City may, at
its own expense, require annual reviews of appraised values. The City
may challenge appraised values established by the Appraisal District
through various appeals and, if necessary, legal action.
(Continued)
18
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
I
(3) Special Assessments
Certain street and drainage construction projects are financed partially
by special assessments. Such projects are recorded in the Capital Pro-
jects Funds because they benefit the entire community and are financed
primarily by general obligation bond proceeds. Special assessments are
levied against properties deemed to be specially benefited by the improve-
ments. Costs of the projects are estimated and property owners are
charged a proportionate share.
I
I
I
Special assessments are recognized as revenue when they become measurable
and available (i.e., estimated to be collected within one year). Assess-
ments which are not "available" at September 30, 1985 of $144,052 are re-
flected as deferred revenue in the Capital Projects Funds.
I
I
(4) Fixed Assets
A summary of changes in general fixed assets follows:
I
Balance
October 1,
1984 Deductions Additions
Land $ 1,038,730 477,073
Buildings and
improvements 992,506 39,061
Improvements other
than buildings 14,673,896 ],627,644
Machinery and
equipment 3,136,841 271 ,089 739,271
Construction in
progress 871,498 1,643,000 2,575,413
$ 20.713.471 1.914.089 5.458.462
I
Other
Changes
Balance
Septem-
ber 30,
1985
(52,341)
1 ,463 ,462
I 1 ,031 ,567
89,401 16,390,941
I
I
(37,060) 3,567,963
1 ,803 , 91 ]
24.257.844
I
Construction in progress at September 30, 1985 is composed of the following:
I
Project
Authorization
Expended to
September 30,
]985 Committed
I
Street and drainage
improvements
],803,9]1
$ 4,115,376
2 , 311 ,465
I
The "project authorization" and "committed" figures above are based on
open contracts and City estimates of total project costs. The City
does not anticipate having to obtain additional financing to complete
the above projects.
I
I
19
(Continued)
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
A summary of proprietary fund type property, plant and equipment at
September 30, 1985 follows:
Water and· Sewer
Enterprise Fund
Land $
Building and improve-
ments
Utility plant in service
Machinery and equipment
Construction in progress
349,464
103,798
27,505,774
836,370
3,179,820
31,975,226
Less accumulated
depreciation
4,825,082
$ 27 ~1501l144
(5) Long-term Debt
The following is a summary of long-term debt transactions of the City for
the year ended September 30, 1985:
General
Obligation Revenue Vacation Total
Long-term debt at
October 1, 1984 $ 9,810,000 14,765,000 47,097 24,622,097
Net change in long-
term portion of
accrued vacation 10,302 10,302
Debt retired (680,000) (355,000) (1,035,000)
Long-term debt at
September 30,
1985 $ 9.130.000 14.410.000 57.399 23.597.399
Bonds payable at September 30, 1985 are comprised of the following individual
issues:
General Obligation Bonds (subsequently refunded - note 10):
$1,000,000 Series 1968 Street Improvement Bonds due in
annual instalments of $35,000 to $60,000 through
July 1, 1998; interest at 5.25% to 5.40%
$
615,000
$1,000,000 Series 1969 Street Improvement Bonds due in
annual instalments of $45,000 to $70,000 through
March 15, 1994; interest at 5.25% to 5.30%
525,000
(Continued)
20
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
$500,000 Series 1970 Street Improvement Bonds due in
annual instalments of $20,000 to $50,000 through
March 15, 1995; interest at 6.75% to 7.10%
$500,000 Series 1971 Street Improvement Bonds due in
annual instalments of $20,000 to $35,000 through
July 10, 1997; interest at 6.0% to 6.4%
$500,000 Series 1973 Street Improvement Bonds due in
annual instalments of $25,000 through September 1,
1995; interest at 4.5% to 5.25%
$880,000 Series 1973A General Obligation Bonds due in
annual instalments of $35,000 to $40,000 through
March 1, 1998; interest at 4.7% to 5.5%
$2,000,000 Series 1981 General Obligation Bonds due in
annual instalments of $100,000 to $200,000 through
March 1, 1998; interest at 7.5% to 10.0%
$4,500,000 Series 1982 General Obligation Bonds due in
annual instalments of $300,000 through September 1,
1997; interest at 8.75% to 11.75%
$1,500,000 Series 1983 General Obligation Bonds due in
annual instalments of $100,000 through September 1,
1998; interest at 7.10% to 9.25%
Revenue Bonds:
$5,275,000 Series 1971 Waterworks and Sewer System Rev-
enue Bonds due in annual instalments of $155,000 to
$425,000 through September 1,2001; interest at 6%
to 7%
$3,500,000 Series 1978 Waterworks and Sewer System
Revenue Bonds due in annual instalments of $70,000
to $640,000 through September 1, 2003; interest at
5.400% to 6.625%
$2,400,000 Series 1980 Waterworks and Sewer System
Revenue Bonds due in annual instalments of $45,000
to $215,000 through September 1, 2003; interest at
8.0% to 9.8%
I
I
I
I
21
$
315,000
330,000
250,000
495,000
1,700,000
3,600,000
1,300,000
$ 9.130.000
$ 4,280,000
3,060,000
2,215,000
(Continued)
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
$3,000,000 Series ]983 Waterworks and Sewer System
Revenue Bonds due in annual instalments of $60,000
to $320,000 through September 1, 2003; interest at
7.75% to 10.75%
$ 2,890,000
$2,000,000 Series ]984 Waterworks and Sewer System
Revenue Bonds due in annual instalments of $35,000
to $220,000 through September 1, 2004; interest at
9.5% to 12.5%
1,965,000
$ 14.410.000
The annual requirements to amortize all debt outstanding as of September 30,
]985, including interest of $18,255,367 are as follows:
Year ending General
September 30, Obligation Revenue Total
1986 $ 1,428,431 1,516,030 2,944,461
1987 1 ,374,020 1,521,367 2,895,387
1988 1,314,176 1,518,584 2,832,760
1989 1,266,347 1,518,042 2,784,389
1990 1 ,221 ,492 1,524,204 2,745,696
1991-1995 5,434,498 7,577,519 13,012,017
1996-2000 2 , 1 ° 5 ,84 ° 7,655,717 9,761,557
2001-2004 4,819,100 4,819,100
$ ]4.144.804 27.650.563 41.795.367
The authorized unissued debt at September 30, 1985 consisted of the following
general obligation amounts:
Street and drainage improvements
Public safety improvements
Culture and recreation improvements
$ 31,345,000
3,655,000
5,000,000
$ 40.000.000
The ordinances authorizing the issuance of Waterworks and Sewer System
Revenue Bonds created the Interest and Sinking Fund and Reserve Fund.
The gross revenues of the waterworks and sewer system, after deduction
of reasonable expenses of operations and maintenance, are pledged to
such funds in amounts equal to the total annual principal and interest
requirements of the bonds and amounts required to maintain the Reserve
Fund. At September 30, 1985, the Reserve Fund assets were approximately
$7,000 less than the amount required by the ordinances due to the is-
suance of additional bonds in 1984. The ordinances require that such
deficits be funded in equal instalments over a sixty-month period.
(Continued)
22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(6) Employees' Retirement System
The City participates in the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS)
which is a state-wide defined contribution (money-purchase) pension
plan covering substantially all full-time employees. The employees'
contribution rate is 5% of their gross earnings which is matched by a
3% contribution by the City. There are no benefits guaranteed under
this plan other than to the extent provided by employee and employer
contributions, plus earnings, accumulated in individual accounts of
employees. Total City contributions amounted to approximately $178,000
for the year ended September 30, 1985. The City's contributions were
made by the General Fund ($]47,000) and Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund
($31,000). The City has no further liability to TMRS for benefits under
this plan. Control over the operation and administration of the plan is
vested with the State of Texas along with custody of plan assets.
(7) Water and Sewer Contracts
The City has several individual contracts with the City of Fort Worth
(Fort Worth) and the Trinity River Authority of Texas (TRA) for the
purchase of treated water and for the transportation, treatment and
disposal of sanitary sewage and other waste. The initial terms of
the contracts range from twenty-five to fifty years and expire at
various dates from 1994 through 2023. While the provisions of each
of the contracts vary, each contract basically requires the City to
pay varying amounts based on the costs associated with water purchased
and sewage transported and/or treated and disposed of. The cost includes
the City's proportionate share of Fort Worth's and TRA's operating and
maintenance expenses, related debt service costs plus certain other mis-
cellaneous charges. Purchases of treated water and charges for the trans-
portation, treatment and disposal of sewage and other wastes during 1985
amounted to approximately $2,317,000 and $1,390,000, respectively.
(8) Operating Transfers
The General Fund provides certain general and administrative services to
the Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund. The estimated pro rata share of
the costs is reimbursed monthly to the General Fund. Such costs totaled
$450,000 during 1985 and are reflected as operating transfers in the
accompanying combined financial statements.
In June 1985, the City Council approved a transfer of $900,000 from the
General Fund to the Capital Projects Fund to partially finance a new
municipal complex.
(9) Commitments and Contingencies
The City entered into a contract on August 12, ]985 to purchase certain
land and facilities to be used for a library/recreation center for approxi-
mately $4,306,000. The purchase was subsequently financed by the issuance
of General Obligation Bonds in December, 1985 (note 10).
(Continued)
23
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
The City participates in a number of State and Federally assisted grant
programs, principal of which is Federal Revenue Sharing. These programs
are subject to financial and compliance audits by the grantors or their
representatives, the purpose of which is to insure compliance with condi-
tions precedent to the granting of funds. Any liability for reimbursement
which may arise as the result of these audits is not believed to be material.
(10) Subsequent Event
On December 17, 1985, the City issued General Obligation Refunding and
Improvement Bonds of $]3,975,209 (Series 1985, bearing interest at rates
ranging from 5.75% to 8.5%, due in annual instalments of $355,000 to
$],255,000 through February 15,2005). Bond proceeds of $7,762,471 (net
of $212,738 of discount and issuance costs) and a cash deposit from the
City of $1,428,257 were used to advance refund all of the City's outstand-
ing General Obligation Bonds (note 5). The remaining proceeds of
$6,000,000 (less discount and issuance costs) were issued to finance a
purchase of land and facilities (note 9).
The net proceeds from the refunding issue and the cash deposit from the City
have been placed in an irrevocable escrow account and invested in U.S.
Treasury obligations that, together with interest earned thereon, will
provide sufficient amounts to pay future interest and principal on the
issue being refunded. The defeasance of the refunded bonds resulted in a
gain of approximately $300,000. The gain will be recognized in the period
in which the refunding occurred.
24
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GENERAL FUND
I
I
To account for resources traditionally associated with govern-
ments which are not required to be accounted for in another
fund. Major functions financed by the General Fund include:
Administrative; Judicial; Public Information; Finance; Police;
Fire; Protective Inspections, such as building, paving, plumb-
ing and electrical; Traffic Control; Street Repair and Main-
tenance; Community Enrichment Activities such as Parks, Recrea-
tion and Library. Financing is provided by taxes (primarily
property, sales and franchise), license and permits, fines
and interest on investments.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
25
(This page left blank intentionally)
~
-,I
26
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A-I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
General Fund
Balance Sheet
September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for September 30, 1984
Assets 1985 1984
Cash and investments, at cost $ 2,109,548 2,676,517
Receivables (net, where applicable, of allowances
for estimated uncollectible amounts of
$25,786):
Taxes 388,474 331,923
Accrued interest 44,947 52,808
Due from other fund 1,100
Total assets $ 2.542.969 3.062.348
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 82,843 83,248
Accrued liabilities 516,945 345,422
Deposits and other liabilities 12,290 80,820
Deferred revenue 154,247 104,127
Total liabilities 766,325 613,617
Fund balance:
Reserved for encumbrances 27,622 288,489
Unreserved - undesignated 1,749,022 2,160,242
Total fund balance 1,776,644 2,448,731
Total liabilities and
fund balance $ 2.542.969 3.062.348
See accompanying auditors' report.
27
A-2
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
General Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes
in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Year ended September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for year ended September 30, 1984
1985 1984
Variance -
Favorable
Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Actual
Revenues:
Taxes:
Property taxes $ 1,941,424 2,009,967 68,543 1,946,189
Penalties and interest
on delinquent taxes 42,500 40,552 (1,948) 46,868
City sales taxes 3,069,593 2,707,477 (362,116) 2,443,415
Mixed beverage taxes 64,000 68,454 4,454 65,577
Franchise taxes 988,000 1,195,595 207,595 1,010,042
Total taxes 6,105,517 6,022,045 (83,472) 5,512,091
Licenses and permits:
Building inspection 320,000 452,370 132,370 342,485
Paving inspection 50,000 81,263 31,263 123,758
Electrical and plumbing
inspection 77,000 115,553 38,553 81,292
Animal control 3,500 1,806 (1,694) 4,414
Other 38,750 52,498 13,748 41,999
Total licenses and
permits 489,250 703,490 214,240 593,948
Intergovernmental:
Library 6,039
Police 12,650
Total intergovern-
mental 18,689
Charges for services:
Planning and zoning fees 33,000 37,149 4,149 30,358
Recreational activity fees 30,000 40,001 10,001 28,094
Ambulance fees 18,000 31,288 13,288 29,661
Sanitation billing fees 60,000 72,270 12,270 63,508
Other fees 22,500 15,845 (6,655) 19,105
Total charges for
services 163,500 196,553 33,053 170,726
(Continued)
28
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
General Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes
in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual, Continued
Fines:
Municipal Court
Library
Total fines
Miscellaneous:
Interest on investments
Sale of City property
Other
Total miscellaneous
Total revenues
Expenditures:
General government:
Legal (City Attorney)
Legislative (City Council)
Administration (City
Manager)
Public Information (City
Secretary)
Judicial (Municipal Court)
Finance
Planning and zoning
Nondepartmental
Civil service
Total general
government
Public safety:
Police
Fire
Total public safety
Culture and recreation:
Parks and recreation
Library
Total culture and
recreation
Budget
$
178,000
14,100
192,100
250,000
10,000
7,500
267,500
7,217,867
24,000
48,760
157,782
89,878
99,265
833,315
297,493
321,134
66,401
1,938,028
2,333,700
1,510,077
3,843,777
411,514
276,511
688,025
1985
Variance -
Favorable
Actual (Unfavorable)
159,582
16,364
175,946
267,222
15,188
50,637
333,047
7,431,081
32,612
46,490
166,689
92,203
104,482
869,559
367,521
217,024
65,682
1,962,262
2,298,575
1,496,509
3,795,084
355,485
301,695
657,180
29
(18,418)
2,264
(16,154)
17,222
5,188
43,137
65,547
213,214
(8,612)
2,270
(8,907)
(2,325)
(5,217)
(36,244)
(70,028)
104,110
719
(24,234)
35,125
13,568
48,693
56,029
(25,184)
30,845
A-2, Continued
1984
Actual
168,119
9,365
177,484
322,251
94,560
99,361
516,172
6,989,110
22,798
32,974
146,270
54,069
91,993
675,248
210,844
164,775
58,233
1,457,204
1,762,097
1,241,061
3,003,158
190,726
254,674
445,400
(Continued)
A-2, Continued
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
General Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes
in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual, Continued
1985 1984
Variance -
Favorable
Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Actual
Public works:
Administration $ 104,751 99,788 4,963 99,223
Traffic control 230,484 245,119 (14,635) 206,351
Service center 89,948 83,396 6,552 78,425
Street repair and
maintenance 778,854 790,339 (11,485) 634,478
Total public works 1,204,037 1,218,642 (14,605) 1,018,477
Total expenditures 7,673,867 7,633,168 40,699 5,924,239
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over expendi-
tures (456,000) (202,087) 253,913 1,064,871
Other financing sources (uses):
Operating transfers in 456,000 456,000 456,000
Operating transfers out (926,000) (926,000) (1,100,339)
Total other financing
sources (uses) - net 456,000 (470,000) (926,000) (644,339)
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues and other
sources over expendi-
tures and other uses $ (672,087) (672.087) 420,532
Fund balance at beginning of
year 2,448,731 2,028,199
Fund balance at end of year $ 1.776.644 2.448.731
See accompanying auditors' report.
30
1
;1
1
I
I
I
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
1
1
Federal Revenue Sharing Fund - to account for the opera-
tions for which this grant funding is used. Financing
is provided by entitlement grants from the Federal
government.
1
Occupancy Tax Fund - to account for the operations and
expenditures for which hotel/motel occupancy taxes and
sesquicentennial contributions are used. Occupancy
tax revenues are used primarily to attract tourists and
new businesses to the City. Sesquicentennial contri-
butions are used primarily to fund sesquicentennial
festivities.
I
I
Parks and Library Fund - to account for the operations for
which voluntary contributions by citizens are used.
Contributions are used primarily to support park and
library activities.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
31
(This page left blank intentionally)
32
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B-1
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Special Revenue Funds
Combining Balance Sheet
September 30, 1985
with comparative totals for September 30, 1984
Federal Occu- Parks
Revenue pancy and Totals
Assets Sharing Tax Library 1985 1984
Cash and investments, at cost $ 42,261 64,177 14,138 120,576 166,396
Taxes receivable 14,098 14,098 15,200
Accrued interest receivable 5,002 1,479 521 7,002
Due from other government 58,775 58,775 61,211
Total assets $ 106_038 79_754 14_659 200_451 242_807
Liabilities and Fund Balances
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 416 416
Due to other fund 1,100
Total liabilities 416 416 1,100
Fund balances:
Reserved for encumbrances 89,092 89,092
Unreserved - undesignated 16,946 79,754 14,243 110,943 241,707
Total fund balances 106,038 79,754 14,243 200,035 241,707
Total liabilities and
fund balances $ 106_038 79_754 14_659 200_451 242_807
See accompanying auditors' report.
33
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Special Revenue Funds
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures
and Changes in Fund Balances
Year ended September 30, 1985
with comparative totals for September 30, 1984
Federal
Revenue
Sharing
Revenues:
Occupancy tax
Intergovernmental
Contributions
Miscellaneous:
Interest on investments
Other income
Total miscellaneous
Total revenues
$
236,911
22,738
22,738
259,649
Expenditures:
General government
Public safety
Culture and recreation
Total expenditures
29,697
29,697
Occu-
pancy
Tax
75,223
7,069
24,912
31,981
107,204
146,190
146,190
Excess (deficiency)
of revenues over
expenditures 229,952 (38,986)
Operating transfers out (225,000) (6,000)
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over expendi-
tures and operating
transfers 4,952 (44,986)
Fund balances at beginning
of year
101,086
Fund balances at end of year
$ 106.038
See accompanying auditors' report.
124,740
79.754
34
Parks
and
Library
50,845
2,958
2,958
53,803
55,441
55,441
B-2
Totals
1985 1984
75,223
236,911
50,845
32,765
24,912
57,677
420,656
29,697
201,631
231,328
(1,638) 189,328
(231,000)
(1,638) (41,672)
15,881 241,707
14.243 200.035
63,918
244,844
46,220
354,982
7,165
199,566
100,698
307,429
47,553
(6,000)
41,553
200,154
241.707
I
B-3
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Federal Revenue Sharing Fund
Balance Sheet
September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for September 30, 1984
Assets
1985
$ 42,261
5,002
58,775
$ 106_038
1984
Cash
40,975
Accrued interest receivable
Due from other government
Total assets
61,211
102_186
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Due to other fund
Total liabilities
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Fund balance:
Reserved for encumbrances
Unreserved - undesignated
Total liabilities and fund balance
$ 1,100
1,100
89,092
16,946 101,086
$ 106_038 102_186
See accompanying auditors' report.
35
B-4
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Federal Revenue Sharing Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Year ended September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for year ended September 30, 1984
1985
1984
Budget
Actual
Variance -
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Actual
Revenues:
Revenue sharing entitlements $ 245,000
Interest income
Total revenues 245,000
236,911
22,738
259,649
(8,089)
22,738
14,649
244,844
244,844
Expenditures:
General government
Public safety
Culture and recreation
Total expenditures
Operating transfers out
120,000 29,697 90,303
120,000 29,697 90,303
125,000 229,952 104,952
(200,000) (225,000) (25,000)
7,165
199,566
19,550
226,281
Excess of revenues over
expenditures
18,563
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over expendi-
tures and operating
transfers
$ (75.000) 4,952 79.952 18,563
101,086 82,523
$ 106.038 101.086
Fund balance at beginning of
year
Fund balance at end of year
See accompanying auditors' report.
36
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Occupancy Tax Fund
Balance Sheet
September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for September 30, 1984
Assets
Cash and investments, at cost
Taxes receivable
Accrued interest receivable
Total assets
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Fund balance:
Unreserved - undesignated
See accompanying auditors' report.
37
1985
$ 64,177
14,098
1,479
$ 79.754
$ 79.754
B-5
1984
109,540
15,200
124.740
124.740
B-6
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Occupancy Tax Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Year ended September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for year ended September 30, 1984
1985 1984
Variance -
Favorable
Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Actual
Revenues:
Occupancy tax $ 60,000 75,223 15,223 63,918
Interest income 7,069 7,069
Other income 24,912 24,912
Total revenues 60,000 107,204 47,204 63,918
Expenditures - culture and
recreation 150,500 146,190 4,310 40,306
Excess (deficiency)
of revenues over
expenditures (90,500) (38,986) 51,514 23,612
Operating transfers out (6,000) (6,000) (6,000)
Excess (deficiency)
of revenues over
expenditures and
operating transfers $ (96.500) (44,986) 51.514 17,612
Fund balance at beginning
of year 124,740 107,128
Fund balance at end of year $ 79.754 124.740
See accompanying auditors' report.
38
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B-7
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Parks and Library Fund
Balance Sheet
September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for September 30, 1984
Assets
1985 1984
$ 14,138 15,881
521
$ 14.659 15.881
Cash and investments, at cost
Accrued interest receivable
Total assets
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Total liabilities and fund balance
$ 416
14,243 15,881
$ 14.659 15.881
Fund balance:
Unreserved - undesignated
See accompanying auditors' report.
39
B-8
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Parks and Library Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Year ended September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for year ended September 30, 1984
1985 1984
Variance -
Favorable
Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Actual
Revenues:
Contributions $ 50,000 50,845 845 46,220
Interest income 2,958 2,958
Total revenues 50,000 53,803 3,803 46,220
Expenditures - culture and
recreation 50,000 55,441 (5,441) 40,842
Excess (deficiency) of
revenues over expendi-
tures $ (1,638) (1.638) 5,378
Fund balance at beginning
of year 15,881 10,503
Fund balance at end of year $ 14.243 15.881
See accompanying auditors' report.
40
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DEBT SERVICE FUND
I
I
To accumulate monies for the payment of interest and prin-
cipal on long-term general obligation bonds. Financing
is provided primarily by a specific annual property tax levy.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
41
(This page left blank intentionally)
42
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C-l
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Debt Service Fund
Balance Sheet
September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for September 30, 1984
Assets 1985 1984
Cash and investments, at cost $ 2,021,475 1,782,706
Accrued interest receivable 38,758 33,258
Total assets $ 2.060.233 1.815.964
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Fund balance - reserved for debt service
$ 2.060.233
1.815.964
See accompanying auditors' report.
43
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Debt Service Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual
Year ended September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for year ended September 30, 1984
Revenues:
Property taxes
Interest on investments
Total revenues
Expenditures:
Redemption of serial bonds
Interest and fiscal agent
charges
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency)
of revenues over
expenditures $
Fund balance at beginning of
year
Fund balance at end of year
See accompanying auditors' report.
Budget
$ 1,492,504
],492,504
680,000
813,996
1,493,996
(].492)
]985
Variance -
Favorable
Actual (Unfavorable)
],525,042
2]8,082
] ,743,124
32,538
2]8,082
250,620
680,000
818,855
],498,855
(4,859)
(4,859)
244,269
245.76]
1,815,964
$ 2.060.233
44
C-2
1984
Actual
1,5]9,227
218,320
],737,547
670,000
877,30]
],547,30]
]90,246
] ,625,718
1 .8] 5 . 964
!I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
I
Parks and Recreation Fund - to account for the financing and
construction of park facilities, primarily an athletic com-
plex. Financing was provided primarily by the sale of gen-
eral obligation bonds of $1,000,000 in ]983 and a state
grant of $494,794 in ]984. Except for certain improvements,
construction of these facilities was substantially complete
at September 30, 1985.
I
I
Street and Drainage Fund - to account for the financing and
construction of improvements to various street and drainage
projects. Financing was provided primarily by the sale of
general obligation bonds of $5,000,000 in ]983 and transfers
from the General Fund.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
45
(This page left blank intentionally)
46
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D-1
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Capital Projects Funds
Combining Balance Sheet
September 30, 1985
with comparative totals for September 30, 1984
Parks and Street and Totals
Assets Recreation Drainage 1985 1984
Cash and investments, at cost $ 269,743 6,704,901 6,974,644 7,696,209
Receivables:
Accrued interest 5,263 126,584 1 31 ,847 109,026
Special assessments:
Current 61 ,461
Delinquent 192,709 192,709 226,740
Deferred 9 , 1 36
Due from other government 116,950
Total assets $ 275.006 7.024.194 7.299.200 8.219.522
Liabilities and Fund Balances
Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 53,252 259,560 312,812 188,046
Retainage payable 89,693 89,693 105,171
Deposits and other liabili-
ties 519,574 519,574 307,064
Deferred revenue 144,052 144,052 9 , 1 36
Total liabilities 53,252 1,012,879 1,066,131 609,417
Fund balances:
Reserved for encumbrances 2 ,311 ,465 2,311,465 342,200
Unreserved - undesignated 221,754 3,699,850 3,921,604 7,267,905
Total fund balances 221,754 6 ,011 ,315 6,233,069 7 ,610 , 105
Total liabilities and
fund balances $ 275.006 7 .024.194 7.299.200 8.219.522
See accompanying auditors' report.
47
D-2
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Capital Projects Funds
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures
and Changes in Fund Balances
Year ended September 30, 1985
with comparative totals for September 30, 1984
Parks and Street and Totals
Recreation Drainage 1985 1984
Revenues:
State grant $ 494,794
Developer contributions 185,931
Special assessments 162,811
Interest on investments 42,702 718,113 760,815 732,182
Total revenues 42,702 7]8,113 760,815 1,575,718
Expenditures:
Construction contracts 54,908 2,678,122 2,733,030 3,019,030
Engineering and other 5,002 462,819 467,821 277,881
Total expenditures 59,910 3,140,941 3,200,851 3,296,911
Excess of expendi-
tures over
revenues (17,208) (2,422,828) (2,440,036) (1 ,721 ,193)
Other financing sources (uses):
Operating transfers in 1,125,000 1,125,000 1,100,339
Operating transfers out (22,000) (40,000) (62,000)
Loss on litigation settlement (62,568)
Total other finan-
cing sources (uses)
- net (22,000) ],085,000 1,063,000 1 ,037 ,771
Excess of expendi-
tures and other
uses over revenues
and other sources (39,208) (1,337,828) (1,377,036) (683,422)
Fund balances at beginning of
year 260,962 7 ,349 , 143 7,610,105 8,293,527
Fund balances at end of year $ 221.754 6.011.315 6.233.069 7 .610.105
See accompanying auditors' report.
48
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
I
To account for the provision of water and sewer services to
residents of the City. All activities necessary to provide
such services are accounted for in this fund, including, but
not limited to, administration, operations, maintenance, fi-
nancing and related debt service, and billing and collection.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
49
(This page left blank intentionally)
so
I
E-]
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
I
I
I
Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund
Balance Sheet
September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for September 30, 1984
Assets
1985
1984
I
I
Current assets:
Cash and investments, at cost
Accounts receivable:
Billed
Unbilled charges, estimated
Other
$ 4,9]5,235
4,003,681
I
Less allowance for uncollectible accounts
750,464
395,751
53,715
1 , 199 ,930
26,786
1,173,144
534,026 .
548,576
167,003
1,249,605
14,724
],234,881
I
I
Accrued interest
Inventories, at cost
Total current assets
117,266
61,475
6,267,120
52,769
65,964
5,357,295
Restricted assets:
Revenue bond interest and sinking fund:
Cash and investments, at cost
Accrued interest receivable
I
Revenue bond reserve fund:
Investments, at cost
Accrued interest receivable
228,458 209,336
5,803
228,458 2]5,139
] ,452,747 1,263,596
66,0]1
1,452,747 1 ,329 ,607
5,179,550 6,907 ,.840
95,178 77,922
5,274,728 6,985,762
566,757 482,064
24,000 24,000
7,546,690 9,036,572
349,464 22,868
103,798 ]03,798
27,505,774 25,584,832
836,370 772,2]3
28,795,406 26,483,71]
4,825,082 4,195,430
23,970,324 22,288,28]
3,179,820 168 , 180
27 , 1 50 , 144 22,456,461
7 1 ,681 79,267
$ 41.035.635 36.929.595
(Continued)
I
Revenue bond construction fund:
Cash and investments, at cost
Accrued interest receivable
I
I
Customers' deposits - cash and investments,
at cost
Other restricted investments, at cost
Total restricted assets
I
I
I
I
I
I
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:
Land
Building and improvements
Utility plant in service
Machinery and equipment
Less accumulated depreciation
Construction in progress
Net property, plant and equipment
Deferred charges, net of accumulated
amortization
Total assets
5]
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
E-1, Continued
Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund
Balance Sheet, Continued
Liabilities and Fund Equity
Liabilities:
Current liabilities (payable from
current assets):
Current portion of revenue bonds payable
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Other current liabilities
Current liabilities (payable from
restricted assets):
Accrued revenue bond interest payable
Current portion of revenue bonds payable
Customers' deposits
Construction contracts payable
Retainage payable
Deposits
Total current liabilities
Long-term liabilities - revenue bonds (net of
current portion)
Total liabilities
Fund equity:
Contributed capital - subdividers
Retained earnings:
Reserved for revenue bond interest and
sinking fund
Reserved for revenue bond reserve fund
Reserved - other
Unreserved
Total retained earnings
Total fund equity
Total liabilities and fund equity
See accompanying auditors' report.
52
1985
$
339,167
508 ,411
116,422
5,405
963,405
91,305
30,833
566,757
116,533
70,788
46,343
922,559
1,885,964
14,040,000
15,925,964
11,612,574
106,320
1,452,747
24,000
11,914,030
13,497,097
25,109,671
$ 41.035.635
1984
325,417
408,210
75,781
5,405
814,813
115,478
29,583
482,064
9,280
59,940
30,704
727,049
1 ,541 ,862
14,410,000
15,951,862
9,381,654
70,078
1,329,607
24,000
10,172,394
11,596,079
20,977,733
36.929.595
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenses
and Changes in Retained Earnings
Year ended September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for year ended September 30, 1984
Operating revenues:
Water and sewer service sales
Water and sewer connections
Sewer transportation
Service charges
Inspection fees
Total operating revenues
Operating expenses:
Contractual services
Personal services
Repairs and maintenance
Supplies
Depreciation
Franchise fee
Total operating expenses
Operating income
'Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
Interest on investments
Interest and fiscal agent charges
Gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets
Other
Total nonoperating expenses
Income before operating transfers
Operating transfers in
Operating transfers out
Net income
Retained earnings at beginning of year
Retained earnings at end of year
See accompanying auditors' report.
53
1985
$ 7,693,569
324 ,023
179,272
75,113
95,889
8,367,866
4,060,809
] ,002,51 0
242,443
79,905
641,552
37,8]5
6,065,034
2,302,832
1,244,336
(1,168,243)
(6,200)
(109,707)
(39,814)
2,263,018
88,000
(450,000)
1 , 901 ,018
11,596,079
$ 13.497 .097
E-2
1984
7,0]4,907
487,999
155,053
64,]52
115,753
7,837,864
3,282,39]
89] , 183
211,364
64,035
580,837
33,806
5,063,616
2,774,248
],016,354
(1,003,925)
15,500
(44,237)
(16,308)
2,757,940
(450,000)
2,307,940
9,288,139
11 .596 .079
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund
Statement of Changes in Financial Position
E-3
Year ended September 30, 1985
with comparative figures for year ended September 30, 1984
Sources of working capital:
Net income
Items that did not use (provide) working capital:
Depreciation
Amortization
Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets
Total working capital provided from
operations
Proceeds from sale of revenue bonds
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets
Contributions
Increase in current liabilities payable
from restricted assets
Decrease in restricted assets
Decrease in deferred charges
Uses of working capital:
Additions to property, plant and equipment
Decrease in revenue bonds payable
Increase in restricted assets
Increase in deferred charges
Decrease in current liabilities payable
from restricted assets
Net increase in working capital
Changes in components of working capital:
Increase (decrease) in current assets:
Cash and investments
Accounts receivable - net
Accrued interest receivable
Inventories
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities:
Current portion of revenue bonds payable
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Other current liabilities
Due to other funds
Net increase in working capital
See accompanying auditors' report.
54
0] 985
$ 1,901,018
641,552
4,086
6,200
2,552,856
2,550
2,230,920
195,510
],489,882
3,500
$ 6.475.218
$ 5,343,985
370,000
761,233
$ 6.475.218
1984
2,307,940
580,837
3,052
(15,500)
2,876,329
2,000,000
]8,000
1,406,957
6.301.286
2,3]7,176
355,000
2,008,194
28,35]
50,522
1,542,043
6.301.286
$ 911,554 1,203,577
(61,73ï) 202,668
64,497 45,598
\4,489) 20,510
909,825 1 ,472,353
1 3 , 7 50 59,584
100,201 (93,236)
34,641 13,912
(48,985)
(965)
148,592 (69,690)
$ 76].233 ].542.043
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ACCOUNT GROUP
To account for fixed assets not used in proprietary
fund operations.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
55
(This page left blank intentionally)
56
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
F-1
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Schedule of General Fixed Assets - By Sources
September 30, 1985
General Fixed Assets:
Land
Buildings and improvements
Improvements other than buildings
Machinery and equipment
Construction in progress
Total general fixed assets
$ 1,463,462
1,031,567
16,390,941
3,567,963
1,803,911
$ 24.257.844
Investment in General Fixed Assets From:
Capital Projects Funds $ 18,252,153
General Fund 4,668,670
Parks and Library Fund 286,288
Federal Revenue Sharing Fund 966,508
Occupancy Tax Fund 84,225
Total investment in general fixed assets $ 24.257.844
See accompanying auditors' report.
57
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Schedule of General Fixed Assets -
By Function and Activity
September 30, 1985
General Government:
Legislative (City Council)
Administration (City Manager)
Public information (City Secretary)
Judicial (Municipal Court)
Finance
Civil service
General government buildings
Planning and zoning
Total general government
Public Safety:
Police
Fire
Total public safety
Culture and Recreation:
Parks and recreation
Library
Total culture and recreation
Public works
Total general fixed assets
allocated to functions
Construction in progress
Total general fixed assets
See accompanying auditors' report.
Total
Land
Buildings
and
Improvements
$ 13,668
15,039
20,226
31 ,479
272,080
10,775
1 ,017 ,845
61,023
1,442,135
290,481
727,364
290,481
727,364
799,854
1,463,214
2,263,068
617,914 285,985
617,914 285,985
555,067 18,218
555,067 18,218
2,185,290
946,396
3,131,686
15,617,044
22,453,933
1.463.462
1.031 .567
1 ,803, 911
$ 24.257.844
58
I F-2
I
I
I Improvements Machinery
Other Than and
I Buildings Equipment
13,668
I 15,039
20,226
31 ,4 79
6,347 265,733
I 10,775
61,023
I 6,347 417,943
799,854
I 559,315
1,359,169
I 1,443,632 168,373
946,396
I 1,443,632 1,114,769
14,940,962 676,082
I 16.390.941 3.567.963
I
I
I
I
I
I
I S9
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Schedule of Changes in General Fixed Assets -
By Function and Activity
September 30, 1985
General
Fixed Assets
October 1,
1984 Additions Deductions
General Government:
Legislative (City Council) $ 13,668
Administration (City Manager) 9,289 5,750
Public information (City Secretary) 11,919 8,307
Judicial (Municipal Court) 29,513 1,966
Finance 280,506 50,793 (59,2]9)
Civil service 9,006 1,769
General government buildings 850,605 267,]52 (47,571)
Planning and zoning 48,082 12,941
Total general government 1,252,588 348,678 (106,790)
Public Safety:
Police 610,688 294,971 (105,805)
Fire 1,230,366 244,869 (12,021)
Total public safety 1 ,841 ,054 539,840 (117,826)
Culture and Recreation:
Parks and recreation 1,987,067 198,808 (585)
Library 862,506 83,890
Total culture and recreation 2,849,573 282,698 (585)
Public works 13,898,758 1 ,711 ,833 (45,888)
Total general fixed assets
allocated to functions ]9,841,973 2,883,049 (27],089)
Construction in progress 87],498 2,575,413 (1,643,000)
Total general fixed assets $ 20.713.471 5.458.462 (1.914.089)
See accompanying auditors' report.
60
I F-3
1
1
I General
Fixed Assets
1 Other September 30,
Changes 1985
13,668
I 15 ,039
20,226
31,479
1 272,080
10,775
(52,341) 1,017 ,845
1 61,023
(52,341) 1 ,442,135
1 799,854
1 ,463,214
2,263,068
1 2,185,290
I 946,396
3 , 131 ,686
52,341 15,617,044
I·
22,453,933
1 1 ,803, 911
1 24.257.844
1
I
I
I
I 61
(This page left blank intentionally)
62
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I,
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
Table 1
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Debt Service Requirements to Maturity -
General Obligation Bonds
(unaudited)
Fiscal Year Principal Interest Total
1985-1986 $ 680,000 748,431 1,428,431
1986-1987 690,000 684,020 1,374,020
1987-1988 695,000 619,176 1,314,176
1988-1989 705,000 561,347 1,266,347
1989-1990 715,000 506,492 1,221,492
1990-1991 730,000 449,720 1,179,720
1991-1992 740,000 391,553 1,131,553
1992-1993 750,000 332,445 1,082,445
1993-1994 755,000 272,290 1,027,290
1994-1995 805,000 208,490 1,013,490
1995-1996 730,000 141,980 871,980
1996-1997 735,000 79,020 814,020
1997-1998 400,000 19,840 419,840
$ 9.130.000 5.014.804 14.144.804
Note: The above general obligation bonds were advance refunded on December 17,
1985. See note 10 in the Notes to Combined Financial Statements.
63
Table 2
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Debt Service Requirements to Maturity -
Revenue Bonds
(unaudited)
Fiscal Year Principal Interest Total
1985-1986 $ 370,000 1,146,030 1,516,030
1986-1987 405,000 1,116,367 1,521,367
1987-1988 435,000 1,083,584 1,518,584
1988-1989 470,000 1,048,042 1,518,042
1989-1990 515,000 1,009,204 1,524,204
1990-1991 550,000 964,597 1,514,597
1991-1992 595,000 917,897 1,512,897
1992-1993 650,000 868,897 1,518,897
1993-1994 695,000 815,290 1,510,290
1994-1995 760,000 760,838 1,520,838
1995-1996 820,000 703,167 1,523,167
1996-1997 885,000 639,960 1,524,960
1997-1998 960,000 570,830 1,530,830
1998-1999 1,045,000 495,055 1,540,055
1999-2000 1,125,000 411,705 1,536,705
2000-2001 1,220,000 321,325 1,541,325
2001-2002 1,315,000 222,790 1,537,790
2002-2003 1,375,000 124,085 1,499,085
2003-2004 220,000 20,900 240,900
$ 14.410.000 13.240.563 27.650.563
64
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Fiscal Year
1985-1986
1986-1987
1987-1988
1988-1989
1989-1990
1990-1991
1991-1992
1992-1993
1993-1994
1994-1995
1995-1996
1996-1997
1997-1998
1998-1999
1999-2000
2000-2001
2001-2002
2002-2003
2003-2004
Table 3
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Summary of Debt Service Requirements to Maturity -
Annual Principal and Interest Requirements
(unaudited)
General
Obligation Revenue
Bonds Bonds Total
$ 1,428,431 1,516,030 2,944,461
1,374,020 1,521,367 2,895,387
1,314,176 1,518,584 2,832,760
1,266,347 1,518,042 2,784,389
1,221,492 1,524,204 2,745,696
1,179,720 1,514,597 2,694,317
1,131,553 1,512,897 2,644,450
1,082,445 1,518,897 2,601,342
1,027,290 1,510,290 2,537,580
1,013,490 1,520,838 2,534,328
871,980 1,523,167 2,395,147
814,020 1,524,960 2,338,980
419,840 1,530,830 1,950,670
1,540,055 1,540,055
1,536,705 1,536,705
1,541,325 1,541,325
1,537,790 1,537,790
1,499,085 1,499,085
240,900 240,900
$ 14_144_804 27_650_563 41_795_367
65
Table 4
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
General Governmental Expenditures by Function ( 1 )
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(unaudited)
Culture
Fiscal General Public Public and Debt
Year Government Safety Works Recreation Service(2) Total
1975-76 $ 415,746 575,327 321 ,050 75,556 ~52,495 1,740,174
1976-77 447,504 654,495 407,305 75,117 344,280 1,928,701
1977-78 594,913 843,071 691,230 85 , 130 341 ,088 2,555,432
1978-79 784,769 1,157,938 726,238 141,384 343,224 3,153,553
1979-80 869,735 1,672,623 1,324,300 177,425 339,354 4,383,437
1980-81 1,464,794 1,687,816 742,]93 309,05] 332,044 4,535,898
]981-82 1,057,298 2,34],545 905,623 363,339 601,299 5,269,104
]982-83 1,020,201 2,694,042 1,189,821 471,113 1,354,643 6,729,820
1983-84 1,464,369 3,202,724 1,018,477 546,098 1,547,301 7,778,969
1984-85 1,962,262 3,824,781 1,218,642 858,811 1,498,855 9,363,351
Notes: (1) Includes General, Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds.
(2) Includes fiscal agent fees.
66
I
I
I '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(This page left blank intentionally)
67
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
General Revenues by Source ( 1 )
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(unaudited)
Licenses
Fiscal and In t e r-
Year Taxes Permits governmental
1975-76 $ 1,696,009 (2) 166,685
1976-77 1,716,543 (2) 149,004
1977-78 2,033,381 (2) 136,351
1978-79 2,476,921 (2) 206,226
1979-80 3,053,450 (2) 175,539
1980-81 4,525,417 162,995 220,149
1981-82 5,482,969 130,910 233,163
1982-83 7,158,424 420,813 230,904
1983-84 7,095,236 593,948 263,533
1984-85 7,622,310 703,490 236,911
Notes: (1)
( 2)
Includes General, Special Revenue, and Debt Service Funds.
Included in charges for services, detail not available.
68
I
Table 5
I
I
I Charges
for Miscel-
Services Contributions Fines laneous Total
I 82,016 18,056 60,348 39,922 2,063,036
182,020 22,214 83,627 127,633 2 ,281 ,04 1
I 244,781 29,202 82,492 350,521 2,876,728
I 295,342 34,627 90,336 390,009 3,493,461
249,114 40,468 136,638 502,459 4,157,668
I 125,084 43,238 116,688 204,852 5,398,423
122,591 47,612 147,747 506,075 6,671,067
I 155,508 44,352 151,975 821 ,070 8,983,046
I 170,726 46,220 177,484 734,492 9,081,639
196,553 50,845 175,946 608,806 9,594,861
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 69
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Property Tax Levies and Collections
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(unaudited)
Current Percent
Fiscal Total tax tax of levy
Year levy collections collected
1975-76 $ 1,175,891 1,153,060 98.06%
1976-77 1,269,283 1,233,582 97.19
1977-78 1,461,023 1,439,240 98.51
1978-79 1,785,199 1,754,966 98.31
1979-80 2,106,106 2,073,685 98.46
1980-81 2,911,391 2,845,122 97.72
1981-82 3,268,259 3,189,578 97.59
1982-83 3,721,975 3,651,680 98.11
1983-84 3,452,788 3,403,989 98.59
1984-85 3,564,849 3,468,111 97.28
70
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Percent of Percent of
Delinquent total tax Outstanding delinquent
tax Total tax collections delinquent taxes to
collections collections to tax levy taxes tax levy
$ 31,171 1,184,231 100.71% $ 65,960 5.61%
10,882 1,244,464 98.04 90,779 7.15
25,730 1,464,970 100.27 86,058 5.89
14,542 1,769,508 99.12 99,310 5.56
19,928 2,093,613 99.41 110,182 5.23
21,111 2,866,233 98.45 121,635 4.18
59,685 3,249,263 99.42 163,318 5.00
86,476 3,738,156 100.43 147,137 3.95
61,427 3,465,416 100.37 125,783 3.64
66,898 3,535,009 99.16 180,033 5.05
71
Table 6
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(unaudited)
Real Property Personal Property
Fiscal Assessed Estimated Assessed Estimated
year value actual value value actual value
1975-76* $ 106 ,611 ,382 193,838,876 8,672,073 15,767,405
1976-77* 113,645,729 206,628,598 10,793,797 19,625,085
1977-78* 129,392,714 235,259,480 13,844,879 25,]72,507
1978-79* 160,915,961 292,574,475 14,103,546 25,642,811
1979-80* 192,986,048 350,883,724 13,494,922 24,536,222
1980-81* 216,213,632 393,115,695 16,697,663 30,359,387
1981-82* 432,330,155 432,330,155 41,329,645 41,329,645
1982-83** 593,189,950 593,189,950 59,788,103 59,788,103
1983-84** 620,006,241 620,006,241 70,551,270 70,551,270
1984-85** 953,163,721 953,163,721 80,125,844 80,125,844
Notes: ( I ) Increased basis of assessment from 55% to 100%
* Sources: City appraisal records.
** Sources: Tarrant Appraisal District
72
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ratio of
Total total assessed to
Assessed Estimated total estimated
value actual value actual value
115,283,455 209,606,281 55%
124,439,526 226,253,684 55
143,237,593 2 60 , 4 3 1 , 987 55
175,019,507 318,217,286 55
206,480,970 375,419,946 55
232,911,295 423,475,082 55
473,659,800 ( 1 ) 473,659,800 100
652,978,053 652,978,053 100
690,557,511 690,557,511 100
1,033,289,565 1,033,289,565 100
73
Table 7
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Property Tax Rates-All Overlapping Governments
(per $100 of assessed value)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(unaudited)
City
Debt
Fiscal General Service
Year Fund(4) Fund(4)
1975-76 $ .71 .3 ]
]976-77 .74 .28
1977-78 .77 .25
]978-79 .82 .20
1979-80 .62 .40
1980-81 .85 .40
198]-82 * .47 .22
1982-83 .35 .22
1983-84 .28 .22
1984-85 .1974 .1476
Junior
Total(4) College(1)
1 .02 .40
1.02 .40
1 .02 .40
1 .02 .40
1.02 .36
] .25 .35
.69 .05
.57 .05
.50 .05
.345 .03
Note: * Increased basis of assessment from 55% to 100%.
Sources: (1) Tarrant County.
(2) Birdville Independent School District.
(3) State of Texas.
(4) City records.
74
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
School
District(2) Hospital(l) County(l) State(3) Total
1.99 .75 .86 .12 5.14
1.99 .60 .95 .10 5.06
1.99 .60 .95 .10 5.06
1.95 .60 .95 .10 5.02
1.89 .56 .95 4.78
1.04 .31 .29 3.24
1.04 .1 7 .20 2.15
1.05 .1 7 .22 2.06
1.05 .18 .22 2.00
.67 . 11 .1 2 1 .275
75
Table 8
Table 9
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Special Assessment Collections
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(unaudited)
Current Current Total
Fiscal Assessments Assessments Outstanding
Year Levied Collected Assessments
1975-76 $ ( 1 ) 31 ,105 (1 )
1976-77 ( 1 ) 36, ] 41 ( 1 )
1977-78 ( ] ) 21 ,618 (1)
1978-79 ( 1 ) 9,989 ( 1 )
1979-80 ( ] ) 8,208 (1 )
1980-81 393,0]1 3,527 389,484
1981-82 221,817 36,474 574,827
1982-83 28,648 56,316 547,159
1983-84 187,254 297,337(2)
]984-85 192,709
Note: ( 1 ) Not available.
(2) Has been reduced by $62,568 due to litigation settlement.
76
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(This page left blank intentionally)
77
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Ratio of Net Bonded Debt to Assessed Value and
Net Bonded Debt Per Capita
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(unaudited)
Assessed
Fiscal Estimated Value (In
Year Population* Thousands)**
]975-76 23,245 $ 115,283
]976-77 26,05] 124,440
]977-78 27,000 143,238
1978-79 29,850 175,020
]979-80 30,592 206,481
1980-8] 31,250 232,91]
198]-82 31 ,850 473,660 (2)
1982-83 33 , 1 00 652,978
1983-84 35,550 690,558
1984-85 36,500 1,033,290
* Source:
** Source:
North Central Texas Council of Governments.
Tarrant Appraisal District
Notes: (1) Includes all general obligation debt.
(2) Increased basis of assessment from 55% to 100%
78
Gross
Bonded
Debt (])
4,040,000
3,9]0,000
3,780,000
3,645,000
3,500,000
5,200,000
5,045,000
]0,480,000
9,810,000
9,130,000
I
I
I
Debt
I Service
Monies
Available
I 55,525
62,391
I 87,062
I 96,773
125,935
I 723,784
1,326,687
I 1,625,718
I 1 ,81 5 , 964
2,060,233
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 10
Ratio of Net Net
Bonded Debt Bonded
Net Bonded to Assessed Debt Per
Debt Value Capita
3,984,475 3.46% $ 171 .41
3,847,609 3.09 147.70
3,692,938 2.58 136.78
3,548,227 2.03 118.87
3,374,065 1 .63 110.29
4,476,216 1 .92 143.24
3,718,313 .79 ]16.74
8,854,282 1 .36 267.50
7,994,036 1 .16 224.87
7,069,767 .68 193.69
79
Table 11
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Computation of Legal Debt Margin
September 30, 1985
(unaudited)
Article XI, Section 5 of the State of Texas Constitution states in part:
"...no tax for any purpose shall ever be lawful for anyone year,
which shall exceed two and one-half percent of the taxable property
of such city."
As a home rule city, the City of North Richland Hills is not limited by the
law in the amount of debt it may issue. The City's Charter provides that
general property taxes are limited to $1.50 per $100 of assessed valuation
for general governmental services including the payment of principal and
interest on general obligation bonds.
The tax rate for fiscal 1985 was established at $.345 per $100 of assessed
valuation based on 100% of appraised value.
80
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 12
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Computation of Overlapping Debt
September 30, 1985
(unaudited)
Percentage Amount
Applicable to Applicable to
Net Debt City of North City of North
Jurisdiction Outstanding Richland Hills Richland Hills
City of North Richland Hi l1s $ 7,069,767 100.00% $ 7,069,767
Birdville Independent School
District 14,457,000 48.05 6,946,589
Keller Independent School
District 24,824,761 1 .1 1 275,555
Tarrant County 15,280,000 3.76 574,528
Tarrant County Hospital
District 3.76
Tarrant County Junior College
District 9.400.000 3.76 353,440
Total overlapping debt $ 15.219.879
81
Table ]3
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded
Debt to Total General Expenditures
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(unaudited)
Ratio
Total of Debt
Total General Service to
F i s ca 1 Debt Expendi- Total General
Year Principal Interest(2) Service tures(1) Expenditures
1975-76 $ 130,000 222,495 352,495 1,740,174 20.26%
1976-77 130,000 214,280 344,280 ] ,928,701 17.85
]977-78 135,000 206,088 341,088 2,555,432 13.35
1978-79 145,000 198,224 343,224 3,153,553 10.88
1979-80 150,000 249,354 399,354 4,383,437 9.11
1980-81 150,000 182,044 332,044 4,535,898 7.32
]981-82 155,000 446,299 60] ,299 5,269,104 11.4]
1982-83 565,000 789,643 1,354,643 6,729,820 20.13
]983-84 670,000 877,30] 1,547,301 7,778,969 ]9.89
1984-85 680,000 8]8,855 1,498,855 9,363,351 ]6.01
Notes: (1) Includes General, Special Revenue, and Debt Service Funds.
(2) Includes fiscal agent fees.
82
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(This page left blank intentionally)
83
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Revenue Bond Coverage-Water and Sewer Bonds
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(unaudited)
Net Revenue
Direct Available
Fiscal Gross Operating for Debt
Year Revenues(1) Expenses(2) Service
1975-76 $ 1,824,786 961,955 862,831
1976-77 2,142,896 1,160,956 981,940
1977-78 2,820,649 1,330,567 1,490,082
1978-79 2,962,844 1,692,228 1 ,270,616
]979-80 3,742,277 2,244,251 1,498,026
1980-8] 4,297,956 2,445,99] ] ,851 ,965
]98]-82 6,004,143 3,357,3]2 2,646,831
1982-83 7,335,616 3,672,160 3,663,456
]983-84 8,854,2]8 4,482,779 4,371,439
1984-85 9,612,202 5,423,482 4,188,720
Notes: (1) Includes operating revenues and interest on investments.
(2) Excludes depreciation.
(3) Includes fiscal agent fees.
84
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 14
Debt Service Requirements
Principal Interest(3) Total Coverage
349,430 349,430 2.47
80,000 349,430 429,430 2.29
90,000 397,985 487,985 3.05
150,000 551,900 701,900 1 .81
160,000 543,031 703,031 2.13
200,000 724,916 924,916 2.00
215,000 731 ,631 946,631 2.80
225,000 806,264 1,031 ,264 3.55
290,000 1,003,925 1,293,925 3.38
355,000 1,168,243 1,523,243 2.75
85
Table 15
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Demographic Statistics
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(unaudited)
School
Median Per Median Education Enroll- Unemploy-
Fiscal Population Income Capita Age Level ment ment
Year (2) (3) Income(3) (3) (5) ill Rate(4)
1975-76 23,245 17,764 6 , 1 25 38.0 14.0 15,468 4.6
1976-77 26,051 18,986 6,547 38.0 14.3 15,737 4.7
1977-78 27,000 20,288 6,996 38.1 14.3 16,051 4.1
1978-79 29,850 21,675 7,474 38.1 14.4 16,083 3.2
1979-80 30,592 24,093 8,308 28.4 14.5 15,986 3.9
1980-81 31 ,250 3 1 , 000 1 0 , 68 9 28.4 14.5 15,987 4.6
1981-82 31 ,850 32,408 11,175 28.4 14.5 16,151 6.8
1982-83 33,100 33,000 11,379 28.4 14.5 15,975 6.0
1983-84 35,550 33,600 11,600 28.4 14.5 16,324 2.9
1984-85 36 ,500 34,200 11 ,900 28.4 14.5 16,288 4.4
Sources:
( 1 )
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Birdville Independent School District
North Central Texas Council of Governments
Bureau of Census, Department of Commerce
Texas Employment Commission
Haltom Richland Chamber of Commerce
86
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(This page left blank intentionally)
87
Fiscal
Year
1975-76
1976-77
1977-78
1978-79
1979-80
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
1983-84
1984-85
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Property Value, Construction and Bank Deposits
Commercial
Number
of
Units Value
(I) $
( 1 )
33
116
75
51
III
138
176
186
( 1 )
( 1 )
10,249,300
10,591,933
6 ,741 , 789
15,345,644
6,560,105
24,899,302
22,775,168
37,802,836
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(unaudited)
Construction *
Residential
Number
of
Units Value
( 1 )
( 1 )
$
( 1 )
( 1 )
927
26,256,202
655
23,083,387
443
14,632,915
354
18,902,186
463
23,562,438
844
78,239,513
972
77,702,971
914
74,716,548
* Source: City records.
** Source: Tarrant Appraisal District
*** Source: Bank records.
Notes: (1) Not available.
(2) Increased basis of assessment from 55% to 100%.
88
Total Value
12,552,013
25,652,924
36,505,502
33,675,320
21,374,704
34,247,830
30,122,543
103,138,815
100,478,139
112,519,384
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bank
Deposits*** Property
(In Thousands) Value
50,430 *209,606,281
66,357 *226,253,684
99,225 *260,431,987
114,033 *318,217,286
141,258 *375,419,946
166,195 *423,475,082
206,473 *473,659,800 (2)
226,648 **652,978,053
269,014 **690,557,511
315,533 **1,033,289,565
Table 16
89
Taxpayer
Federated Stores
Realty, Inc.
Epoch Management, Inc.
Robert S. Folsom
et. ale
North Hills Medical
Hospital
Robert J. Bentel
et. ale
Hudiburg Trust
Tarrant County - 1
Partners
Graham Magnetics, Inc.
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Principal Taxpayers
September 30, 1985
(unaudited)
Type of Business
1985
Assessed
Valuation*
Department store and
shopping mall
$ 24,890,848
Apartments
23,320,563
Vacant land and apart-
ments
21 ,669,809
Hospital
15,985,046
Apartments
10,308,382
Automobile dealership
9,008,912
Apartments
8,141,713
Manufacturer
7,752,772
Hilltop Apartments, Ltd. Apartments
Rufe Snow Outlet Mall
7,636,646
Shopping mall
7,505,253
$ 136.219.944
* Source: Tarrant Appraisal District.
90
Table 17
Percentage
of Total
Assessed
Valuation
2.41%
2.26
2.10
1 .55
.99
.87
.79
.75
.74
.72
1 3 . ] 8%
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 18
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Miscellaneous Statistics
September 30, 1985
(unaudited)
Date of incorporation
Form of government
Area
Miles of streets
Number of street lights
Fire protection:
Number of stations
Number of firemen and officers
(exclusive of volunteer firemen)
Number of fire hydrants
Police protection:
Number of stations
Number of policemen and officers
Number of patrol units on duty at anyone
time
Number of law violations (includes traffic
violations)
Education:
Attendance centers
Number of classrooms
Number of teachers
Number of students
Average daily attendance
Number of administrative personnel
Municipal water department:
Number of consumers
Average daily consumption
Miles of water mains
Number of water connections
Sewers:
Sanitary sewers
Storm sewers
Number of sewer connections
Building permits issued
Culture and recreation:
Number of parks
Number of picnic areas
Number of libraries
Number of volumes
Average monthly circulation
91
1958
City Manager/Council
18.9 square miles
135 miles
1,228
3
48
695
1
53
8
10,382
25
813
812
16,288
15,142
77
17,943
1,001,329 cubic feet
139
17,943
136 miles
102 miles
16,270
1 , 1 00
4
4
1
52,688
16,535
(Continued)
CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS
Miscellaneous Statistics, Continued
(unaudited)
Employees:
Classified service
Exempt
Elections:
Registered voters
Number of votes cast in last general election
Percent of votes cast to number of registered voters
Number of votes cast in last municipal election
Percent of votes cast to number of registered voters
92
Table 18, (continued)
246
30
21,609
12,663
59%
1 ,972
9%
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Police
Subject:
Ordinance for Speed Limit - Ordinance No. 1356
Council Meeting Date: 3124/86
GN 86-24
Agenda Number:
There is currently no Ordinance governing the speed limit on Harwood Road from Grapevine
Highway (State Highway 26) to the 8800 block of Harwood Road (the North Richland Hills
City Limits). The speed limit signs have been in place for sometime, however after the
erection of the signs, the ordinance was apparently never enacted.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the attached ordinance be adopted establishing the speed limit on
Harwood Road from Grapevine Highway to the 8800 block of Harwood at 40 miles per hour.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (G Rev.)
Oper Ing udget
Oth r
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
~e
I
Pl1/~
City Manager
. Finance Director
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Paqe 1 of 1
I.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1356
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 722 OF THE CITY
OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING A PRIMA
FACIA SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MILES PER HOUR ON HARWOOD
ROAD FROM THE INTERSECTION OF GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY
(STATE HIGHWAY 26) TO 8800 BLOCK OF HARWOOD ROAD
(THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY LIMITS).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Countil of North
Richland Hills, Texas, that:
1.
Ordinance No. 722 of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas,
be and is hereby amended by setting the primas facie speed limit at
40 miles per hour on Harwood Road from the intersection of Harwood
Road and Grapevine Highway (State Highway 26) to the intersection of
Harwood Road and 8800 block of Harwood Road (the North Richland Hills
City Limits).
2.
Any person operating a motor vehicle upon said above-described
section, in the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, at a speed in
excess of 40 miles per hour shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor
and :fined not in excess of $200.00.
3.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (1) days
from passage and publication.
I.
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
Passed and Approved this
day of
1986.
Dan Echols - Mayor
ATTEST:
Jeanette Rewis - City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO LEGALITY AND FORM:
Rex McEntire - City Attorney
I ·
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Police
Ordinance Regulating Solicitation -
Ordinance No. 1357
3/24/86
- Council Meeting Date:
GN 86-25
Agenda Number:
Subject:
The Ordinance regulating solicitation in residential areas of North Richland Hills has
not been revised since March of 1961. In order to provide better protection of the
citizens of North Richland Hills the attached proposed Ordinance is recommended.
Further, the fees that were established in 1961 are no longer sufficient to cover the
expenses involved in processing the permits. The attached ordinance provides for
stricter requirements, higher fees and enables the City ample time to investigate those
individuals who wish to solicit in the residential areas of North Richland Hills. Also
the proposed Ordinance addresses charitable organizations that were not addressed in
1961. Charitable organizations are exempt from fees established by this Ordinance.
It is believed that, with the rapid increase of population and crimes in the
neighborhoods, this ordinance is needed at this time.
The attached Ordinance has been coordinated with the City Attorney and the City
Secretary's Office.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the attached Ordinance be adopted.
Finance Review
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
KtJL~
I City Manager
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
. Finance Director
Paqe 1 of
1
I,
~
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 1357
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,
TEXAS:
PREAMBLE
This entire ordinance is and shall be deemed as an exercise of the police
power of the State of Texas, and of the City of North Richland Hills, for
public safety, comfort, welfare, convenience and protection of the City
and Citizens of said City, and all of the provisions hereof shall be
construed for the accomplishment of that purpose.
ARTICLE I ITINERANT VENDORS
SECTION 1: DEFINITION
For the purpose of this article, an itinerant merchant is any person who
either sells from house-to-house or from place-to-place in the City.
SECTION 2: PERMIT REQUIRED
Every itinerant merchant as defined in the foregoing section shall be
required to obtain a permit prior to the engaging in the business of an
itinerant merchant. An application for a permit to do business as an
itinerant merchant shall file an application in writing with the city secre-
tary not less than ten (10) days before the first month in which he proposes
to engage in business as an itinerant merchant. The application must contain
the following information.
(a) The full name of the person applying for a permit and his address
and telephone number, if any; if the itinerant merchant is selling on behalf
of an organization, the name and address of the parent organization shall also
be supplied.
(b) The license plate number of any and all vehicles to be used by the
permittee must be provided. The Texas drivers license number of any and all
who will operate a motor vehicle for the permittee must be provided.
(c) Proof of liability insurance (as required by State Law) must be
provided at the time of request for this permit. Such proof shall be in
format permitting retention by the city secretary.
(d) The addresses of the itinerant merchant during the previous five (5)
years with the name of at least one reference in each community.
(e) The name, address, date of birth and fingerprints of each agent
selling with the City.
(f) A copy of a limited sales tax permit issued by the State of Texas,
or proof that the goods sold are not subject to such sales tax.
(g) A statement of the type of goods or wares to be sold.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(h) A copy of a current health certificate if merchandise of edible
quality is to be sold; provided, however, this shall not apply to the sale of
candy, nuts or other edibles prepared and packaged by a nationally recognized
manufacturer or a Texas manufacturer meeting standards imposed by state and
local health code, if such packages are unbroken.
(i) A statement of the period of time such applicant wishes to sell or
solicit in said city, providing that no permit shall issue granting such
authority in excess of one (1) calendar year from date of issue.
(j) Positive proof of identification of each applicant and agent.
SECTION 3: BOND REQUIRED
The application described in Section 2 hereof shall be accompanied by a
bond in the penal sum of $10,000.00, signed by applicant, and signed, as
surety, by some surety company authorized to do business in the State of
Texas, conditioned for the final delivery of goods, wares, merchandise or
services, in accordance to indemnity any and all purchasers or customers
for any and all defects in material or workmanship that may exist in the
article sold by the principal of said bond, at the time of delivery, and that
may be discovered by such purchaser or customer within 30 days after delivery,
and which bond shall be for the use and benefit of all persons, firms or
corporations that may make any purchase or give any order to the principal on
said bond, or to an agent or employee of the principal. Provided that in case
applicant is a person, firm, company, partnership, corporation or association
engaging in any activity mentioned in paragraph two hereof through one or more
agents or employees, such persons, firm, company, partnership, corporation or
association shall be required to enter into only one bond, in the sum of
$10,000.00 as above required, which bond shall be made to cover the activities
of all its agents or employees up to a maximum of 5 agents or employees.
SECTION 4: FEES ATTACHED
That the license fee for an itinerant merchant, or itinerant vendor shall
be $100.00. Provided, however, when any person, firm, company, partnership,
corporation or association engages in any activity mentioned in Section one
hereof through one or more agents or employees such person, firm, company,
partnership, corporation or association shall, in addition to said $100.00
above mentioned, pay a license fee of $50.00 for each agent or employee so
engaged, all of which licenses shall be valid for one year from the date of
their issuance. The fees herein provided for shall be used for the purpose of
defraying expenses incident to the issuing of said licenses.
SECTION 5: EXEMPTIONS
(a) The provisions of this ordinance shall not apply to sales made to
dealers by commercial travelers or sales agents in the usual course of
business, nor to sales made upon authority and by order of law, nor to
vendors of farm products, if such products are from the farm of the vendor.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
(b) No provision of this ordinance shall be construed to apply to
children engaged in the sales of items for extra curricular activities
sanctioned by the school district nor for agricultural products in their
natural state sold by the grower.
(c) No exemption is either expressed or implied for any vendor of
confectionary or dairy products (including those foods commonly referred to as
ice cream) sold from mobile vending trucks nor for the sale of botanical
products vended from the roadside or door-to-door.
SECTION 6: EDIBLE MERCHANDISE, SANITATION
Every person who is licensed as an itinerant merchant to peddle edible
merchandise, as required by this chapter, shall keep all articles for sale to
the public in a clean and sanitary condition, as well as the wagons, vehicles,
or other conveyances used in the transportation of such merchandise.
SECTION 7: QUALITY AND ACCURATE MEASURES
It shall be unlawful for any itinerant merchant to sell or offer to sell
any unsound or unwholesome merchandise or to give a false weight or measure to
such article sold or offered for sale.
SECTION 8: CANCELLATION OF LICENSE
Each itinerant merchant license issued hereunder shall be subject to
cancellation for any violation of any provision of this chapter applicable to
itinerant merchants.
SECTION 9: NO PERMITS TO CERTAIN PERSONS
No permit shall be issued to any person who shall have been convicted of
any crime involving moral turpitude, including, but not limited to fraud,
swindling or related crimes.
SECTION 10
Any itinerant merchant, vendor or peddler in the City of North
Richland Hills, -Texas shall at all times while working in such capacity wear
and prominently display a badge or placard clearly identifying the said vendor
by name and clearly identifying the base or parent organization he is
representing. The letters of said badge or placard must be at least 1/8 inch
in height.
ARTICLE II. CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS
SECTION 1: DEFINITIONS
Charitable solicitation means conduct whereby a person, organization,
society, corporation or its agent, member of representative:
(a) Solicits property, financial aid, gifts in money, or any article
representing monetary value;
I,
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(b) Sells or offers to sell a product, article, tag, service publi-
cation, ticket, advertisement, subscription; or,
(c) Holds, promotes or participates in entertainment, sports event,
benefit dance, fair, bazaar, or other type of organized social entertainment;
on the plea or representation, whether express or implied, that the proceeds
from the solicitation, sale or entertainment are for a charitable purpose.
CHARITABLE PURPOSE means the use of money or property for the benefit of:
(a) Charity or philanthropy, or poor, impoverished, destitute, under-
privileged, needy, refugee, diseased, injured, crippled, disabled, or
handicapped persons, or persons in need of rehabilitation;
(b) Patriotism, that is, for the teaching of patriotism or the relief or
assistance of veterans or veterans' organizations; or
(c) Existing educational institutions or for the establishment or
endowment of educational institutions or in aid of the education of any person
or group of persons.
SECTION 2: PERMIT REQUIRED; EXCEPTIONS; DEFENSES
(a) No person or organization may conduct a charitable solicitation by
handbills, advertisements, house-to-house canvass, or by any other method in
the city without the person, organization, society, or corporation responsible
for conducting the solicitation first obtaining a permit in compliance with
the terms of this article.
(b) If a person or organization conducts or manages a charitable soli-
citation in the name of or on behalf of another person or organization, each
entity shall obtain a charitable solicitation permit.
(c) It is a defense to prosecution under this article that:
(1) An organization solicits funds or goods only from its own member-
ship.
(2) A person or organization solicits funds only by use of a public
broadcasting media;
(3) A person or organization solicits funds only from foundations;
(4) The organization, person, society, corporation holds a religious
solicitation permit under this ordinance.
(d) This article shall not apply to persons under eighteen (18) years of
age if engaged in fund raising activities for a nonprofit organization using
all profits for young people's activities or donating all profits to charities
other than a sponsoring organization. This article shall also not apply to
persons under fifteen (15) years of age engaged in fund raising activities for
a nonprofit organization which is using all profits for young people's acti-
vities or which will donate all profits to charities other than the sponsoring
organization; nor shall such article apply to the organization for which such
young persons are soliciting.
I,
~
1
(e) A solicitation is conducted within the city when it is communicated
to a person then located within the city, whether or not the person making the
solicitation receives a contribution or makes a sale.
SECTION 3: APPLICATION FOR PERMIT
I
(a) An applicant for a permit to conduct a charitable solicitation in
the city shall file an application in writing with the city secretary not less
than ten (10) days before the first month in which the proposed charitable
solicitation activities are planned.
1
I
(b) Upon the showing of unforeseen emergency or circumstances necessi-
tating immediate action to render aid for a charitable purpose, the city
secretary may issue a charitable solicitation permit on a temporary basis
before the expiration of the required ten-day period as provided in the
foregoing subsection.
1
(c) The application must contain the following information:
I
(1) The full name of the person or organization applying for a permit to
to solicit and the address of the headquarters in the city; if the
organization is a chapter or other affiliate of an organization
having its principal office outside the city, the name and address
of the parent organization.
I
-
(2) The names and addresses of all officers and directors or trustees of
the organization and the name and city of residence of all officers,
directors or trustees of the parent organization, if any.
I
(3) The name of the person or persons by whom the receipts of the
solicitation will be disbursed; if the receipts are transmitted to a
parent organization for further disbursement, detailed information
on the methods of handling and disbursement of all funds and a
detailed and complete financial statement of the parent organization
for the last preceding fiscal year.
I
I
(4) The name and address of the local person or persons who will be in
charge of conducting the charitable solicitation.
I
(5) A description of the method or methods to be used in conducting the
charitable solicitations.
I
(6) The period within which the charitable solicitation will be conduct-
ed, including the proposed dates for the beginning and ending of the
solicitation.
I
(7) A full statement of the character and extent of the charitable work
done by the applicant within the city during the preceding year and
a statement of the specific purpose for which funds are to be
solicited, together with a detailed account of their intended use.
I
r
I
(8) If the applicant is a corporation, a copy of its charter or articles
of incorporation from its state of incorporation if the applicant is
a foreign corporation, a copy of its certificate to do business in
this state.
I,
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
(9) If the applicant is a charitable corporation or other nonprofit
organization, proof of the applicant's current status as a chari-
table association or other organization to which contributions are
tax deductible for federal income tax purposes.
(10) A statement of whether contributions to the person or organization
for tax deductible and what percentage of the contributions are not
tax deductible.
(11) Other information which may be required by the city secretary in
order to determine fully the type and character of the proposed
solicitation.
SECTION 4: INVESTIGATION: ISSUANCE AND DENIAL OF PERMITS
(a) Upon receipt of an application, the city secretary shall make or
cause to be made, an investigation to determine the qualifications of the
applicant for a permit.
(b) If the city secretary finds:
(1) That the applicant has met all the requirements of this ordinance;
(2) That none of the circumstances in subsection (f) of this sections
exist;
the city secretary shall issue a permit.
(c) If the city secretary finds that the applicant does not meet the
requirements for a charitable solicitation permit as provided in subsection
(b) of this section, or that there is need to question the applicant to
clarify the application, the city secretary shall so notify the applicant at
least ten (10) days in advance of a hearing.
(d) After a formal hearing if the city secretary finds:
(1) That the application has met all the requirements of this article;
(2) That none of the circumstances in subsection (f) of this section
exist;
the city secretary shall issue a permit.
(e) In the case of unforeseen emergency or circumstances necessitating
immediate action to render aid for a charitable purpose, the city secretary
may issue a charitable solicitation permit on a temporary basis, not to exceed
ten (10) days, if the applicant has met all other requirements of this article
and qualifies under subsection (b) of this section. Temporary permits issued
by the city secretary shall automatically expire after ten (10) days.
(f) If the city secretary shall refuse issuance of a permit if, upon
investigation and hearing, it is found that the applicant has not complied
with all the requirements of this article or that anyone or more of the
following enumerated statements are true:
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
(1) One or more of the statements made in the application or at a
hearing on the application are false.
(2) The applicant or person in charge of the charitable solicitation has
been convicted of fraud, theft, conversion, embezzlement, swindling,
robbery, or burglary, or that the applicant or person in charge has
made or caused to be made false statements or misrepresentations to
a member of the public with regard to the charitable solicitation
campaign or other activities described in the permit, or has in any
way publicly represented that the charitable solicitation permit is
an endorsement or recommendation of the cause for which the chari-
table solicitation is being conducted or has otherwise violated any
of the terms of a charitable solicitation permit or this article.
(3) There is no local resident in a responsible position with the
organization conducting the charitable solicitation.
(4) Applicant received a charitable solicitation permit on a conditional
basis in the previous year and failed to comply with conditions of
the permit.
g. If the city secretary refuses a charitable solicitation permit an
applicant pursuant to this article, no appeal within the city administration
is appropriate, all such appeals may be heard only by the local governing
body.
SECTION 5: DURATION OF PERMIT; NONTRANSFERABLE
(a) Charitable solicitation permits are valid only for the period
specified in the permit. Permits will be issued for a period of thirty (30)
days unless the applicant documents the necessity for a longer period. Upon a
showing by the applicant of necessity, the city secretary may approve issuance
of a permit for a period not to exceed one year.
(b) An extension of the permit, not to exceed thirty (30) days may be
granted by the city secretary upon a showing of good cause by the permittee.
(c) Charitable organizations continuously operating on an annual basis,
which have as their chief source of revenue the sale of goods, wares, and
merchandise, whether or not donated to the organization, will hold permits
effective from February 1st of each year until January 31st of the following
year. Annual written applications must be submitted for renewal of these
permits.
(d) A charitable solicitation permit is nontransferable.
SECTION 6: PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS
(a) When contributions to a person or organization are not wholly tax
deductible, the person or organization shall prominently state, in all mater-
ials used in the solicitation and in all verbal solicitations, the percentage
which is not tax deductible.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
(b) All applicants rece1v1ng charitable solicitation permits shall
supply their solicitors with credentials of identification, to be shown upon
request.
(c) The holder of a charitable solicitation permit is responsible for
the overt acts of his authorized representatives in connection with the
solicitation.
(d) No person shall use or disburse funds collected pursuant to a
charitable solicitation permit for a purpose other than the charitable purpose
described in the application and the actual and necessary expenses incident to
the solicitation, collection, and disbursement of the funds.
(e) No person may solicit or obtain gifts in money or merchandise,
directly or indirectly, by the misrepresentation of names, occupation, affil-
iation, physical disability, financial condition, social condition, or resi-
dence.
SECTION 7: COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE
No person may solicit contributions for a charitable purpose until the
provisions of this ordinance are fully complied with and until a permit for
the purpose has been issued by the city secretary authorizing the solicitation
in the city.
(a) In all cases where the city secretary has reason to believe that a
person or organization is soliciting for a charitable purpose without a permit
or the funds of a person or organization operating under a charitable solic-
itation permit have been or are being diverted from the purposes for which
they are collected, or have been secured by misrepresentation, the person or
organization involved is subject to investigation by the city secretary, and
may require the person or organization to file an immediate account of its
receipts and expenditures.
(b) The city secretary may execute in writing and cause to be served
upon a person who is believed to have information, documentary material, or
physical evidence relevant to an alleged or suspected violation of this
article, an investigative demand requiring the person to furnish, under oath
or otherwise, a report in writing setting forth the relevant facts or
circumstances of which he has knowledge, or to appear and testify or to
produce relevant documentary material or physical evidence for examination, at
a reasonable time and place as may be stated in the investigative demand,
concerning a charitable solicitation that is the subject matter of an investi-
gation.
(c) Failure or refusal to comply with an investigative demand made
pursuant to the provisions of subsection (b) of this section is a violation of
this ordinance.
SECTION 8: REVOCATION OF PERMIT
(a) The city secretary shall revoke a charitable solicitation of a
permittee for anyone or more of the following reasons:
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
(1) The making of a false statement as to a material matter in an
application or hearing concerning an application;
(2) The making of a false statement or misrepresentation to a member of
the public with regard to the solicitation activity;
(3) Violation of any of the terms or conditions of the charitable
solicitation permit;
(4) Violation of a provision of this ordinance;
(5) The representation by a permittee that the charitable solicitation
permit is an endorsement or recommendation of the cause for which
the solicitation is being conducted.
(b) The city secretary shall send written notice of a revocation to the
permittee by certified mail, return receipt requested, setting forth the
reasons for the revocation.
SECTION 9: PROHIBITED CONDUCT
A person engaged in charitable solicitation either door-to-door or in a
public place shall not:
(1) Obstruct or impede the passage of a pedestrian or vehicle;
(2) Make physical contact with the person being solicited unless that
person's permission is obtained.
(3) Misrepresent the charitable purpose of the solicitation; or
(4) Misrepresent the charitable affiliation of those engaged in the
solicitation.
SECTION 10: BONDING REQUIRED
An organization described in Section one of Article two shall, at time of
application submit a bond in the penal sum of $10,000.00, and signed as
surety, by a surety company authorized to do business in the State of Texas;
conditioned for the final delivery of goods, wares, merchandise or services,
in accordance with the terms of any order obtained prior to delivery, and also
conditioned to indemnify any and all purchasers or customers for any and all
defects in material or workmanship that may exist in the article sold by the
principal of said bond, at the time of delivery, and that may be discovered by
such purchaser or customer , within 30 days after delivery, and which bond shall
be for the use and benefit of all persons, firms or corporations that may make
any purchase or give any order to the principal on said bond, or to an agent
or employee of the principal. Provided that in case applicant is a person,
firm, company, partnership, corporation or association engaging in any
activity mentioned in paragraph two hereof through one or more agents or
employees, such persons, firm, company, partnership, corporation or assoc-
iation shall be required to center into only one bond, in the sum of
$10,000.00 as above required, which bond shall be made to cover the activities
of all its agents or employees.
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
SECTION 11: PERMIT SHALL ISSUE WITHOUT FEE
In the event an organization shall qualify as a charitable organization,
as defined in Article two Section one of this ordinance no fee shall be
attached to the issuance of such permit for solicitations.
ARTICLE III. RELIGIOUS SOLICITATION
SECTION 1: DEFINITIONS
(a) Religious solicitation means conduct whereby a person, organization,
society, corporation, or its agent, member or representative:
(1) Solicits property, financial aid, gifts in money, or any article
representing monetary value; or,
(2) Sells or offers to sell a product, article, tag, service, or printed
~aterial; on the plea or presentation, whether express or implied,
that the proceeds from the solicitation or sale are for the reli-
gious purpose.
(b) Religious purpose means the use of money or property for the support
of a church, religious society, or other religious sect, group or order.
(c) Public place means any property open or devoted to public use.
(d) Door-to-door means private residences and businesses of persons who
are both unknown to the person soliciting and not members of the church,
religious society or other religious sect, group or order on whose behalf the
solicitation is performed.
SECTION 2: REGISTRATION; IDENTIFICATION BADGE
(a) A person who engages in religious solicitation door-to-door in a
public place shall first register with the city secretary, giving the follow-
ing information:
(1) Name of registrant;
(2) Name of organization;
(3) Duration and locations of proposed solicitations; and
(4) Number of participants.
(b) Registration expires after one year and must be renewed annually.
If a change occurs in any of the information submitted with the registration,
the person or organization shall notify the city secretary of the change.
(c) A person shall wear an easily readable identification badge meeting
the requirements of subsection (c) while engaged in religious solicitation in
a public place.
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
Ie
I
(d) The identification badge required by subsection (b) must:
(1) Be in a form prescribed by the city secretary;
(2) Identify the name of the organization as registered with the city
secretary; and
(3) Contain the statement "Religious Solicitation".
(e) If a person, organization, society, or corporation conducting a
religious solicitation obtains a charitable solicitation permit in compliance
with Article II of this chapter, that person, organization, society, or
corporation is not required to comply with the requirements of this section.
ARTICLE 3: PROHIBITED CONDUCT
A person engaged in religious solicitation door-to-door or in a public
place shall not:
(1) Obstruct or impede the passage of a pedestrian or vehicle;
(2) Make physical contact with the person being solicited unless that
person's permission is obtained;
(3) Misrepresent the religious purpose of the solicitation; or
(4) Misrepresent the religious affiliation of those engaged in the
solicitation.
SECTION 4: FEES
In the event an organization shall qualify as a religious organization,
as defined in Article III Section one no fee shall attach to the issuance of
the permit for solicitation.
SECTION IV. SOLICITATION GENERALLY
SECTION 1: EXHIBITING CARD PROHIBITING SOLICITORS
(a) A person, desiring that no merchant or other person engage in a home
solicitation at his residence, shall exhibit in a conspicuous place upon or
near the main entrance to the residence, a weatherproof card, not less than
three (3) inches by four (4) inches in size, containing the words, "NO
SOLICITORS". The letters shall be not less than two-thirds (2/3) of an inch
in height.
(b) Every itinerant merchant and charitable solicitor upon going onto
any premises upon which a residence is located shall first examine the resi-
dence to determine if any notice prohibiting soliciting is exhibited upon or
near the main entrance to the residence. If notice prohibiting soliciting is
exhibited, the merchant or solicitor shall immediately depart from the pre-
mises, without disturbing the occupant, unless the visit is the result of a
request made by the occupant.
I,
~
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
P
I
I
I
I
1
I
~
I
I
(c) No person shall go upon any residential premises and ring the
doorbell, or rap or knock upon the door or create any sound in a manner
calculated to attract the attention of the occupant of the residence, for the
purpose of securing an audience with the occupant and engaging in or attempt-
ing to engage in charitable solicitation or sale of merchandise as an itine-
rant merchant transaction, if a card as described in subsection (a) above is
exhibited in a conspicuous place upon or near the main entrance to the resi-
dence, unless the visit is the result of a request made by the occupant.
(d) No person, other than the occupant of the residence, shall remove,
deface, or render illegible, a card placed by the occupant pursuant to sub-
section (a) above.
(e) Any merchant or charitable solicitor who has gained entrance to a
residence, or audience with the occupant, whether invited or not, shall
immediately depart from the premises without disturbing the occupant further
when requested to leave by the occupant.
SECTION 2: HOURS OF SOLICITATION
No itinerant merchant, vendor, peddler, solicitor or salesman as these
terms are defined in this ordinance shall go from house to house or from place
to place in this city soliciting, selling or peddling between the hours of
7:30 p.m. and 8:30 a.m., and it is hereby made a violation of this ordinance
and is a finable offense.
SECTION 3: PENALTIES; CIVIL REMEDIES, LICENSE FORFEITURE
(a) Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be fined as
provided in section IV-4; each day such violation continues shall constitute a
separate and distinct offense.
(b) In case of any willful violation of any of the terms and provisions
of this chapter, the city, in addition to imposing the penalties above pro-
vided, may institute any appropriate action or proceeding in any court having
proper jurisdiction, to restrain, correct or abate such violations; and the
definition of any violation of the terms of this chapter as a misdemeanor,
shall not preclude the city from invoking the civil remedies given it by the
laws of the state, but same shall be cumulative and subject to prosecution as
hereinabove prescribed for such violations.
(c) Each day's engaging in the business regulated by this chapter
without the payment of the fee due thereon, and procuring a receipt, or
license, therefore, and each day's failure to comply with any of the other
provisions of this chapter, shall constitute a separate offense, and the
person so found guilty of such violation, or failing to comply with the
provisions hereof, shall upon conviction be punished therefor as hereinabove
provided; provided, the court trying said cause shall have the right and power
upon conviction of any person for violation of any of the provisions of this
chapter to decree, and to make the same a part of the judgment in such cause a
forfeiture of such license as such person may have procured hereunder.
However, in the event of such forfeiture of license, no part of such license
fee as may have been so paid shall be refunded to such person, and no further
license shall be issued to such person for the remining period of such license
year under this chapter.
I-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
SECTION 4: FINES
Any person, firm or corporation violating any portion of this ordinance
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and may be fined not less than ten ($10.00)
dollars nor more than $1,000.00 dollars.
SECTION 5: SEVERANCE CLAUSE
Each and every provision, paragraph, sentence and clause of this ordi-
nance has been separately considered and passed by the City Council of the
City of North Richland Hills, and each said provision would have been sepa-
rately passed without any other provision, and if any provision hereof should
be ineffective, invalid, or unconstitutional for any cause, it shall not
impair, nor affect the remaining portion nor any other part thereof, but the
valid portion shall be enforced just as if it had been passed alone, and all
ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage
and publication as provided by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE 24th day of March, 1986.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
_Ubject:
Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary
C ., M . D 3/24/86
- ouncl eetlng ate:
GN 86-26
Agenda Number:
Appointment of Assistant City Secretary
Mrs. Patricia Hutson has been assigned to the City Secretary's Office for the past
seventeen months. She is responsible for the processing, sale and validation of
Birth/Death Certificates, sale of socilitors, alcoholic beverage, arcade and garage
sale permits, and acting in behalf of the City Secretary during her absence. Her
duties also include final preparation of the agenda and minutes. Mrs. Hutson has
proven herself efficient, dependable, and with the mature judgment to sign documents
during the absence of the City Secretary and for routine certifications required on
Birth/Death Certificates and other legal documents.
Recommendation:
Appoint Patricia Hutson as Assistant City Secretary.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Budget
.Other _
0ú/u~/h/ ~~
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acct. Number
Sufficient Funds Available
t) 1(c£~
City Manager
. Finance Director
Paae 1 of
1
_. ---.------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
<"
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Administration
SUbject:
· 3/24/86
- Council Meeting Date:
Ratification of Expenditure from Capital Improvement
Funds - Resolut1·on No. 86-12 PU 86-10
Agenda Number:
This Resolution confirms the expenditure of $40,000 from the Capital Improvement Funds
for the repair of the unsafe lighting at Richfield Park. This project is now
progressing rapidly and will be completed by the target date of April 11, 1986.
Funding Source:
Funds were previously allocated for improvements to Richfield Park listed as follows:
03-02-01-6300 - $40,000
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the attached Resolution be approved.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
e Other
~
Finance Review
Acct. Number See Above
,:UffiC~dS Available
C- r'<.-c
. Finance Director
Department Head Signature
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
.."
RESOLUTION NO. 86-12
WHEREAS, the City Council has received bids for electrical work to
be done to correct the lighting and electrical defects in Richfield Park; and
WHEREAS, the low bid was in excess of $178,000.00 which Was rejected
by the City eouncil; and
WHEREAS, an emergency exists in that the electrical system now in
place in the baseball portion of the Richfield Park facility is dangerous to
participants and spectators; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has been able to procure a contractor to
correct the dangerous condition in that portion of Richfield Park, which is in
or near the baseball diamond, on a cost-plus basis at an estimated cost of
$40,000.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, that:
1.
An emergency exists in that the electrical system in a portion of
Richfield Park is dangerous to persons in or near the baseball facility in
said park.
2.
The expenditure of $40,000.00 from Capital Improvement Funds, be and
is hereby approved, ratified and affirmed and the City Manager is directed to
use said funds to correct the dangerous electrical defects in and around the
baseball facility in Richfield Park.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 24th day of March, 1986.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Attorney
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Public Works
Department:
Change Order U3 - Chapman Drive Paving and
SUbject: Drainage Improvements
Council Meeting Date: 3-24-86
Agenda Number: PW 86-9
This change order is for the purpose of substituting a 6" temporary asphalt curb for the
concrete curb originally planned for a section of Chapman Drive. This section will be
narrower than the rest of the road but will be widened to its full length by the property
owner at the time he develops it. At that time the originally planned 6" concrete curb
and gutter will be installed.
Funding Source:
The funding for this change requires a decrease in the budget of the Chapman Drive Project
account, 13-00-48-6150 and a transfer to the budget of Unspecified Projects account,
13-00-99-6150 in the amount of $2,774.00.
Recommendation:
The Staff recommends approval of change order #3 for a net savings of $2,774.00.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~
Operating Budget _
_Other &/\Q __~
Department Head Signature '
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Acet. Number See Above
Sufficient Funds Available
'·Ge '711(>... ~ "'~
1
~f1c1~
City Manager
./
. Finance Director
Page 1 of
1
~
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC.
CONSUL TINC ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
February 21, 1986
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
City of North Richland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-334, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
CHAPMAN DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPVTS.,
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
Enclosed is Change Order No. 3 to the referenced project which covers the cost of
6-inch high asphalt curb construction. Because of right-of-way negotiation
problems, a section of Chapman Drive will be narrowed down between approximate
Station 43+00 to Station 50+60 and a temporary asphalt curb is proposed on the
north side within this section. An offset will be constructed on the north side
at statión 50+60 and concrete curb and gutter will be recontinued at this point
eastward. The property owner between Station 43+00 and 50+60 will be required to
widen the road~y to its full design width and construct concrete curb and gutter
at a later date when the property develops. The proposed curb inlet in this
section on the north side has also been eliminated.
Substitution of asphalt curb for the concrete curb and gutter reduces the total
contract amount by $2,774. The difference in quantity of asphalt and stabilized
subgrade will be taken into account in the final quantity tabulations.
After approval of this change order please execute the attached form and return it
to our office for further distribution. Meanwhile, please call if you have any
questions.
¿(), .~
ALBIN, P.E.
RW AI r a
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
f1r. Richard Royston, Director of Planning
~Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Mr. Floyd McCallum~ City Inspector
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 e BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 e 817/283-6211 e, METRO/267-3367
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Department:
Public Works
Council Meeting Date: 3-24-86
Agenda Number: PW 86-10
SUbject: Change Order 113 on Morgan Meadows East Drainage
This change order increases the bid price on this project. It calls for replacing
the earthen channel across the Roy Strickland property with a concrete lined channel
and the addition of an 8 foot wide, 40 foot span bridge across the channel.
In addition to the amount needed for the lined channel as outlined in the
engineer's letter, an additional amount of $l5,000 is needed for a service
access ramp.
Funding Source:
This change order involves a transfer of budgeted funds from Unspecified Projects
account #13-00-99-6150 to Morgan Meadows East account #13-00-51-6150.
Recommendation:
The Staff recommends approval of change order #3 as described above, increasing
the contract amount by $8l,562.84 and a transfer of funds in the amount of $8l,600
to cover the additional costs.
Finance Review
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
Operating Budget
Other ~~/ K~~
Department Head Signature
. Finance Director
See above
x
CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Page 1 of
1
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
LG&
K NOWL TON-E NG LI 5 H-F LOWE RS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas
t1a r c h 4, 1 98 6
Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works
City of North R;chland Hills
7301 N.E. Loop 820
North Richland Hills, Texas 76118
RE: 3-317(b), CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
MORGAN MEADOWS (EAST) DRAINAGE
CHANGER ORDER NO. 3
Attached is Change Order No.3 to the referenced project. This change
order covers the cost of replacing the earthen channel across the Roy
Strickland property with a fully concrete lined section. Also included in
this change order is an 8-foot wide, 40-foot span double tee bridge to
provide Mr. Strickland with access to his property from both sides of the
channel. Additional fencing along the full channel length and across the
bridge on each side is included. Seeding of the earthen channel is
eliminated as noted on the change order form.
The original design included concrete lining of the channel to minimize
future maintenance problems by the Public Works Department.
Mr. Strickland had originally agreed to dedicate a 70-foot wide drainage
easement across his property with the provision that the channel be left
in an earthen condition wHh relatively flat side slopes designed to
prevent injury to his horses. However, with the horses free to wander
down into the channel, gates must be constructed on each end of the
property to keep the horses in while permitting stormwater to flow across
the property in the channel. These gates will collect alot of trash and
debris and must be cleaned periodically. This earthen channel section
will be a continual maintenance problem for the City until it is fully
concrete lined. Therefore, we would strongly recommend that the Council
approve this change order if funds are available.
The total cost of the change order based on estimated quantities is
$66,562.84. which is about 8-percent of the total contract amount of
$827,280.67. This extra work will extend the contract completion time 60
days. We would suggest that this item be placed on the t~arch 24, 1986,
Con tin ued . . .
1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
. .,;
March 4, 1986
Morgan r~eadows
Page
2
meeting for Council consideration of approval.
Meanwhile, the contractor should continue with other non-conflicting work
such as fence construction along the top of the completed concrete
channel, seeding or sodding along the top of the channel as required, bar
ditch work, driveway culvert replacements, etc. Also, concrete riprap
work on the Walkers Branch Channel (Change Order No.1) should be
accomplished--construction staking is complete and cut sheets have been
made available.
Please call if you have any questions.
w,~
RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E.
RWA/ra
Enclosures
cc. Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager
Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager
Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works
Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning
Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector
Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance
Mr. Lynn Henry, LCH Construction Co.
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS
Purchasing 3-24-86
Department: Council Meeting Date:
Final payment of Langlitz Wilkerson for Fire Station
Subject: Number One in the amount of $28,253.00 Agenda Number: PAY 86-14
Outlined below is a recap of the expenses for the above mentioned station:
Budgeted
Actual
Account II
A. Land $60,537.00
B. Landscaping 2,500.00
C. Furniture Fixtures 37,500.00
D. Building Cost 229.800.00
E. Engineering & Architectural 0
$60,537.00
4,410.00
17,104.34
*220,251.00
12,412.00
1113-90-02-6000
1113-90-02-6100
1113-90-02-6500
1113-90-02-6200
1113-90-02-6200
$330,337.00
I
I
overage
$314,717.34
28,253.00
342,970.34
12,633.34
Final Payment
* Total amount of change orders
($14,748.00) ALL READY REFLECTED IN THIS AMOUNT
final work and punch list's
Funding Source:
Inadvertently a budget was not established for Engineering and Architectural fees and
therefore we are requesting that City Council establish a budget listed as follows:
From:
Unspecified
13-90-99-6150
$12,634.00
To:
Building Cost
13-90-02-6200
$12,634.00
Recommendation: Staff recommends final payment be made to Langlitz Wilkerson in the
amount of $28,253.00 and a transfer of funds from Unspecified Funds as
indicated above.
Source of Funds:
Bonds (GO/Rev.)
_ Operating Bud et
., Other
~
Finance Review
Acct. Number IISee Above
~Uf~U~dS Available
<- /7?~~. v ~
r(11J~
I City Manager
Y COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
Finance Director
wEk
I
PaQe 1 of 1
I
Ie
I
5001 Denton Highway
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
HAL TOM
RICHLAND
AREA
CHAM SER
OF
COM M ERCE
Haltom City, Texas
76117
(817) 281-9376
Serving Cities of:
Haltom City-
Richland Hills
N. Richland Hills
Watauga
Feb~uary 14, 1986
, .
The Honorable Mayor Dan Echols
CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS
5016 Nevada
NO. Richland Hills, TX. 76118
Dear Mayor Echols:
After several years of research, your Chamber of Commerce
has decided at this time to follow through with a major
chang~ outlined three years ago in our Long Range Plan.
This major change being a new name that would provide __
good geographic identification for our area. . Special'
consideration was given to one important decision:
either include all city names or none of the city
names in the Chamber of Commerce name. This in itself
presented the major portion of the challenge - geogra-
phic identification.
On May 1, 1986, the Haltom Richland Area Chamber'of
Commerce will become -
The Northeast Tarrant County Chamber of Commerce
5001 Denton Hwy.
Fort Worth, Texas 76117
The Chamber's printed material will bear the words,
IIServing the cities of Haltom City, North Richland Hills,
Richland Hills, Watauga and surrounding areas".
This should provide your Chamber of Commerce with local
identification, metroplex identification and national
identification. It is the feeling of the Board of
Directors that this geographic identification is im-
portant to the future development of our communities.
I will be requesting a place on your council agenda
soon to present this information in person and answer
any questions you may have. Should you have questions
prior to that date, please contact me at 281-9376.
Yours truly,
~
Charles Owen
President