Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC 1986-06-09 Agendas
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICRLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIt AGENDA JUNE 9, 1986 - 6:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. _ER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. GN-86-56 Proposed Bond Sale - 1986 Series General Obligation Bonds (Agenda Item No. 38) -- /./ ' ... 2. PZ-86-21 Consideration of Proposed Amendment to Section XX of the Zoning Ordinance 1080, Ordinance No. 1375 (Agenda Item No. 24) 3. GN-86-52 Fire Department Reorganization Plan (Agenda Item No. 34) 4. Assistant Director of Public Works Position (Memo Attached) 5. GN 86-55 Proposed Support Services Department (Agenda Item No. 37) 6, City Cable 36 Van (Memo Attached) 7. GN 86-53 Selection of Architect for Fire Department Construction Projects (Agenda Item Ne. 35) 8. Qther Items I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. *Executive Session to Discuss Land, Personnel, and/or Litigation *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law --"- I" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 9, 1986 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting May 12, 1986 5. Minutes of the Joint Meeting June 3, 1986 6. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 7. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by Asterisk (25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, & 43) 8. PZ 86-9 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL HEARING - Request of the Estate of Louis Engler and Nettye Freeman Engler to rezone Tract 4, John C. Yates Survey, Abstract 1753, Tract 1, D.H. Hightower Survey, Abstract 1891, and Tract 2D, H.W. Cook Survey, Abstract 366, from AG (Agriculture) to C-2 (Commercial) (Located at the southwest corner of Watauga Road and St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad) I" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. Ordinance No. 1368 10. PZ 86-14 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Harwood Plaza Apartments--Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Lot 2, Block 2, Walker's Branch Addition from R-7 MF (Multi-Family) to C-l (Commercial) (Located on the northeast corner of Emerald Hills Way and Grapevine Highway) 11. Ordinance No. 1369 12. PZ 86-15 PLA1~ING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Sigmor Corporation to rezone a portion of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Parkers Subdivision from C-I (Commercial) to C-l-SU-Sale of Beer for Off-Premises Consumption (Located at 6877 Grapevine Highway) 13. Ordinance No. 1370 14. PZ 86-16 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Cambridge Co., Inc. to rezone Lot 3, Block I, Northpark Plaza Addition from C-l (Commercial) to C-2 (Commercial) (Located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive north of Watauga Road) 15. Ordinance No. 1371 I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 16. PZ 86-17 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Frank B. Holland to rezone a portion of Tract 2, J. Condra Survey, Abstract 310 from AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located north of Starnes Road immediately ~est of Kings~ood Addition and south of Londonderry Addition) 17. Ordinance No. 1374 18. PZ 86-19 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of James Walker to rezone Tract 4R, A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630 from R-7 MF (Multi-Family) to C-2 (Commercial) (Located on the east side of Flory Street between Harmonson Road and Glenview Drive) 19. Ordinance No. 1372 20. PZ 86-20 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of David Barfield to rezone a portion of Lot 3R-1, Block 1, Martin Addition from AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located on the north side of Nob Hill Drive) 21. Ordinance No. 1373 I" I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 22. PZ 86-18 Request for an Appeal Hearing on PZ 86-18 23. PZ 86-22 Request for an Appeal Hearing on PZ 86-22 24. PZ 86-21 Consideration of Proposed Amendment to Section XX of the Zoning Ordinance 1080, Ordinance No. 1375 *25. PS 86-17 Request of Kenneth C. Whitely, Trustee, for Replat of Lots 24R and 25 through 29, Block 1, Oak Hills Addition (Located on the northwest corner of Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road) *26. PS 86-20 Request of Jack Roseberry for Replat of Lots 2R-2A and 2R-2B, Block 13, Meadowview Estates. (Located on the northwest corner of Davis Boulevard and Rumfield Road) *27. PS 86-21 Request of Chart Development for Replat of Tract 3A, 3B, and 3C, NRH Industrial Park Addition (Located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive south of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad) I" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 5 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *28. PS 86-22 Request Jack E. King for Replat of Lot 9-R, Block 4, Diamond Loch Addition (Located on the south side of Tabor Drive between Lariat Drive and Diamond Loch Drive) *29. PS 86-23 Request of Don Wayne Guthrie for Replat of Lot 8R, Block 4, Diamond Loch Addition (Located on the south side of Tabor Drive between Lariat Drive and Diamond Loch Drive) *30. PS 86-25 Request of Ike Harris & Co. for Final Plat of Windsor Park Addition (Located on the north side of Chapman Road east of Rufe Snow Drive) 31. SO 86-9 Request of Eagle Outdoor for Approval of Billboard Sign on Loop 820 (Located on south side of Loop 820 approximately 1750 feet west of Rufe Snow Drive) *32. GN 86-50 Contract with North Texas Commission 33. GN 86-51 Consideration of Street Name Change from Rumfield Road to Starnes Road, Ordinance No. 1367 *34. GN 86-52 Fire Department Reorganization Plan I" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 6 NUMBER ITEM ~ ACTION TAKEN *35. GN 86-53 Selection of Architect for Fire Department Construction Projects *36. GN 86-54 Appointment of Deputy Clerk, Resolution No. 86-24 *37. GN 86-55 Proposed Support Services Department *38. GN 86-56 Proposed Bond Sale - 1986 Series General Obligation Bonds 39. GN 86-57 Appointment to Various Boards & Commissions Board of Adjustment (2 year terms): David Barfield, Jack Roseberry, Billy Cypert, Ron Hubbard (Alt.), Forrest Grubb (Alt.) Board of Appeals( 2 year terms): Orville Baker, Joe Coulson, John Larriviere, Robert Skinner, Erick Hill, Byron Sibbet (Alt.) Cable TV(2 year terms): Gaye Ingram (Additional appointments will be submitted at the City Council Meeting Monday night) Library Board (2 year terms): Polly Brinkley, Jan Daniels, Lynn O'Day, Mickey Oxford. Park and Recreation Board (2 year term): Sharon Battles I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . . <J Page 7 ~ER ITEM ACTION TAKEN Planning & Zoning Commission (2 year terms): Don Bowen, Carole Flippo (Alt.), Mark Wood, John Schwinger *40. PU 86-17 Ratification of Concessionaire Contract for Northfield Park *41. PW 86-18 Authorization for Engineering of Water and Sewer Capital Improvements *42. PAY 86-17 Partial Pay Estimate #6 & Final in the Amount of $77,239.42 to Walker Construction for Flory Street Water, Sewer and Drainage Improvements *43. PAY 86-18 Municipal Complex Pay Estimate 117 and Final in the Amount of $36,901.33 44. Citizen Presentation 45. Adjournment I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - City of JX8rth Richland Hills, Texas ~~ r June 9, 1986 PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM ADDED TO THE JUNE 9, 1986, COUNCIL AGENDA: 39.a GN 86-58 Resoultion Regarding Highway Beautification Grant /8171281.0041/7301 N_E. LOOP 820/P_O_ BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 76118 I Iè I I I I I I I tt I I I I I I ~ I I INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Rodger N. Line, City Manager PWM-0020-86 REF: FRO~ Gene Riddle, Director Public Works June 5, 1986 DA TE: SUBJECT: Assistant Director of Public Works Position Since Allen Bronstad retired on March 15, 1986, I have been without an Assistant Director of Public Works. I had hoped that the word would have spread among the cities that we would have an opening after Allen left but, I have not received any inquiries up to this point. I would strongly recommend that we advertise and try to hire an Assistant Director of Public Works who is a registered engineer with some city experience or someone who has worked for a consulting firm. In addition to doing the work that the Assistant Director normally performs this engineer would be very valuable in our day to day operation to advise us on small public works jobs and also to eliminate the necessity for Richard Albin to come out sometimes twice in one day to solve an engineering problem. This is very time consuming for Richard Albin to do this and I feel it could relieve Richard Albin to do more important jobs at his office. If possible we would hire an engineer with some expertise in traffic. As you can see from Richard Albin's memo there are numerous other duties that an in-house engineer could perform and relieve Richard even further to better take care of the engineering in his office. Even though Knowlton-English-Flowers charges us a high rate for miscellaneous engineering, as I understand it, this is very costly to them and they do not actually make any money from this type of work. In conversation with Richard Albin he feels that they would even save money by him not having to get out of the office as often as he does at this time. I feel the salary for this engineer will probably have to be higher than the salary range for the Assistant Director of Public Works. But, I feel that we will save something in the neighborhood of $80,000 to $90,000 a year by having an in-house engineer. Refer to the Civil Service memo concerning salary for this position. I agree with Richard Albin's memo outlining the typical city engineering functions that an in-house engineer could perform. However, in one area, which is review of subdivision construction plans, I feel that if it is a very large construction job that those particular plans should still go to Richard Albin to be reviewed and have a comment letter. But the small subdivisions could be handled in-house. I would like to request that we get some direction from the Council for the authority to proceed with the hiring of an Assistant Director of Public Works and City Engineer. ~ Gene ·~ I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I {' I - KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. &ø~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas June 3, 1986 "Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager City of North Richland Hills ~ ~- 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texa~-76118 Re: 3-007, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL STUDIES, TYPICAL CITY ENGINEERING FUNCTIONS As you requested, we have prepared a list of typical City Engineering-type functions which cover the most important work tasks which a resident City Engineer would normally perform. The City Engineer should be a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas. If the candidate's registration . was not closely related to your position, you might want to require a few more years of Civil Engineering experience after registration. We would expect a salary range of $35,000 to $45,000 assuming minimal fringe benefits and depending upon the individual's qualifications. The following is a list of some of the major functions which can be best performed by a resident City Engineer without requiring excessive support staff and facilities: 1. MONITOR SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES a. Review of Subdivision Construction Plans prepared by developer's engineers. b. Handle all meetings, telephone calls and correspondence with developers and their engineers. c. Submit as-built construction plans to Consulting Engineers (KEF) for updating water and sewer grid maps, storm drain, maps, etc. 2. PERFORM TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION STUDIES a. Coordinate traffic count and other monitoring operations. b. Warrant intersections for stop signs or signalization. c. Design traffic signalization systems and specify equipment. Use Consulting Engineering staff (KEF) for detailed construction plan drafting and specification writing as required. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267.3367 I I . _ I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I I_ I - Page 2 - - June 3, 1986 - - Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager 3. ADMINISTER FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM a. Screen citizen questions and complaints regarding flooding problems. Determine if the problem is confined to private property, in which case City involvement is-not appropriate, or if flooding originates within dedicated street rights-of-way or drainage easements in which case City-initiated corrective···meas·ures may be required. b. Provide base floõd elevation data to developers and private citizens from Flood Insurance Rate Maps or Drainage Master Plan, and prepare Certification of Flood Plain Documents as required. c. Submit requests to FEMA for Flood Insurance Rate Map updates and flood boundary revisions resulting from improvements in the major channels and streams in North Richland Hills. 4. COORDINATION OF FIELD ACTIVITIES a. Consult with Water and Sewer Superintendent regarding pump station, storage tank, water well, and sanitary sewer system monitoring and maintenance operations. b. Supervise street and drainage and water and sewer construction inspection personnel. c. Submit street, drainage, water and sewer system inventory and evaluation data to Consulting Engineers (KEF) for updating computer data base on these systems for information retrieval and future studies as required. 5. WATER AND SEWER CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS WITH NEIGHBORING CITIES 6. PROCESS CONSTRUCTION GRANTS AND LOANS APPLICATIONS 7. ADMINISTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 8. ANNUAL CIP CONSTRUCTION BUDGET PREPARATION The preceding list represents functions which we think an in-house resident City Engineer could perform to ,the advantage of the City. Our firm is best equipped for construction project design and administration of Paving, Drainage, Water and Sewer Systems, and related Civil Engineering type Capital Improvements Projects. We have a large staff of experienced engineers, technicians, draftsmen, and field survey personnel including specialists in all areas of municipal civil engineering project design and administration. I · Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I Page 3 - - June 3, 1986 - - Mr. Rodger N. line, City Manager We believe it will be to the City's advantage to continue using our finm for all your City Mapping revision and update operations since we maintain extensive files on over twenty years of public works construction projects " in North Richland Hills. We have a powerful computer system with large data storage capacity for maintaining aLgr.eat variety of city engineering and other municipal data which is used for studies, reports, and project design. We also maintain a large microfilm storage and reproduction system of all sub- division plans since we sta-rted doing subdivision reviews for the City in the early 1970's. We would còntinue to update this microfi1m system with as- built subdivision plans submitted to our office from the City. Our files and data would continue to remain open to use by the City Staff upon request. We are available to meet with you and/or the Council and Staff for a more detailed discussion of the engineering functions outlined above. Please call if you have any questions. ~~w, RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA:mh Encloses cc: Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assist. Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning Mr. lee Maness, Director of Finance I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I . INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Rodger N. Line, City Manager REF: CSM: 0077-86 FROM R.R. McKinnev, Personnel Director DATE: June 5, 1986 SUBJECT: Salary Survey of Civil Engineer. The attached Salary Survey shows the prevailing rates for engineering positions for (7) cities in the mid-cities area. In (3) of the cities (Bedford, Grapevine, and Duncanville) their engineer also functions as Director of Public Works or Director of Planning and Development. Since our proposed engineer will not be a department head, I estimated that the salary in those (3) cities for a non-department head engineer would be $5,000 less than their Directors. I then calculated that the average salary for the (7) cities is $42,230. Frank Knickerbocker, Farmer's Branch City Engineer and K.B. Fuller, Euless Personnel Director both advised that it would take about $42,000 to hire a Civil Engineer with Traffic Engineering experience. After compiling the salary data, I was surprised at how close the (7) city average is to the salary figure mentioned by Frank and K.B. Although the salary range for a Civil Engineer with Traffic Engineering experience should be $38,000 - 50,000, it is recommended that the maximum salary be restricted to $45,000 because of the $48,000 salary maximum of our Public Works Director. If things go as anticipated, the proposed engineer would be prepared for the Director of Public Works position when Gene Riddle retires. We should anticiµate that a salarv of $40,000 - 42,000 will be required to fill our engineering position. with a salarv maximum of $45,000 there should be ample room for growth by the engineer before Gene retires. There is $12,000 rema1n1ng in our vacant Asst. Public Works Director's salary account which should be enough to cover this budget year's salary expense for an engineer. ~ ... ~ I Ie I I I I- I ~ CD ::r' I þJ <: CD tr ~ 0. OQ CD I r1" CD 0. ~ w '" 'Ln . \D 0\ I-t¡ 0 t1 0 c: 1 t1 > (1.1 (1.1 r1" Ö I ~. t1 ........ '"U ~ þØ 0 (1.1 I ~. rt ~. 0 ::' I I I 1 Ie 1-- n ~. ~ r1" ~ '< 0\ ~ t:Ej ~ ~ 0 O'Q 0 ...... t/) ~ I-i CD CD t1 ::r'1-t¡t:Ej Ö CD 0 (1.1 ~. þJ t1 r1" -Eli t1 0. U1 ........ ~ 0 '"U tJ: CD O~ '0 ~ t:Ej ~ ~ ~ Ö OQ I U1 0 I to%j ~. 0. .. 0 0 ~ CD 0 ~ ::c (t)þØ 0 t:1 CD r1"O ~ t1 .. » (1.1 (1.1 ~ ~ W ~ Ö t:Ej ~ ~. c:: t1 t-t \D ......... t:Ej N '"U t/) ~ t/) I n t:Ej .. ::r'1-t¡t:Ej Ö CD 0 (1.1 ~. þJ t1 r1" ~ t1 0. ~ ........ GJ ~ '" '"U ~ (t) 0 -Eli .. ~ ~ ~ ~ \D '"U OQ I N '" I t:Ej ~. 0... 0\ < ~ CD \D ~ H (t)þØ '" Z CD r1"O\ ~ t:Ej t1 .. n ~. -tß <: W ...... t-t \D t----& t:Ej ~ ~ t:Ej H 0 ~ t/) 0 O'Q < ~. H ~ t-t (t) t-t CD t:Ej t1 CD Q..trJ t;1 ~ CD (1.1 ".. O'QþØ r1" t1 ~. þJ ......... ~ t1 '"U (t) rtEli ~ t----& Ö CD a ~ ~ þJ c:: t1 CD ~ \D ~ Z ~ .. .. C"') r1"~ \D ~ > N N ~ ::r'O 0 Ö CD (t) H þJ I-t¡ ::: t-t 0.0 t-t t1 t:Ej I ~ 0 n ~ ~ I .. n ~. to%j -tß r1" » ~ '< ~ N .. t%j t:Ej ~ ~ ::c N O'Q t/) 0 ~. ~ tJ: CD ~ CD t1 Z n ::r: t/) ~ c:: ~ ::c N < ~ t:Ej .-c:: w 0 » < ~ ~ n H < H t-t [%j Z GJ H Z t:Ej t:Ej ~ t/) ~ < tzj .-< 0\ ........ ()) 0\ I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I '- 1 I - City of jX8rth RichJand Hills, Texas June 5, 1986 Ref: CMM 0070-86 Memo to: Rodger Line, City Manager From: Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Subject: City Cable 36 Van Two years ago a van was donated to the City for the purpose of providing live on location telecasts on City Cable 36. This van was in questionable condition when we received it and it will no longer pass the safety inspection and is now mechanically inoperable. We recently tried a quick fix in an effort to broadcast live the Richland High School Commencement Exercise. The van was unable to make it to Birdville Stadium. Included in next year's budget proposal will be a replacement van. However, with the wagon train's arrival in June and Founders Day activities it would be desirable to purchase a van prior to these events. The purchase of a replacement van can be declared an emergency by the City Council and they can authorize the Purchasing Agent to negotiate this purchase. If the Council desires to do this they will need to declare an emergency, allocate $15,000 and authorize the Purchasing Agent to negotiate the purchase of a van. Adequate funds are available in the City Council contingency account. DH/ph D~lhu4 (817) 281 0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HILLS, TX 76118 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - MAY 12, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Echols called the meeting to order May 12, 1986, at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Marie Hinkle Mack Garvin Virginia Moody Harold Newman Jim Ramsey Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Lee Maness Gene Riddle John Whitney Richard Royston Richard Albin Don Bowen J. Douglass Davis City Manager Assistant City Manager City Secretary Attorney Finance Director Public Works Director Purchasing Agent Director of Planning City Engineer Planning & Zoning Member Park & Recreation Member Members of the Press 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING APRIL 29, 1986 APPROVED Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve the minutes of April 29, 1986. Motion carried 6-0; Councilman Garvin abstaining. 5. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING MAY 5, 1986 APPROVED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the minutes of the Special Meeting. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I May 12, 1986 Page 2 Motion carried 6-0; Councilman Garvin abstaining. 3. INVOCATION Councilman Fisher gave the invocation. 6. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem Davis removed Items No. 25 and 26 from the Consent Agenda. 7. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (20, 21, 22, 23, 28, 33, 34, 35, 36 & 37) APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. 8. PZ 86-7 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF J.V. FRANK TO REZONE A PORTION OF LOT 19, BLOCK 33, HOLIDAY WEST ADDITION FROM C-l TO C-2 (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BUENOS AIRES DRIVE EAST OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone Wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. B.J. Franklin, representing Bill Fenimore appeared before the Council. Mr. Franklin stated that they planned to build a self-service car wash. Councilman Fisher asked if the building would be brick. Mr. Franklin stated that it would be brick. Mr. Franklin presented to the Council a design of what they planned to build. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 9. ORDINANCE NO. 1360 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve Ordinance No. 1360. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I May 12, 1986 Page 3 Motion carried 6-1; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilmen Garvin, Fisher, Ramsey, Newman, and Councilwoman Hinkle voting for and Councilwoman Moody voting against. 10. PZ 86-8 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF 46 PROPERTY OWNERS IN MORGAN MEADOWS ADDITION TO REZONE THEIR INDIVIDUAL LOTS TOGETHER IN MORGAN MEADOWS ADDITION FROM THEIR PRESENT CLASSIFICATION OF R-l (SINGLE FAMILY) TO R-1-S (SINGLE FAMILY SPECIAL) (LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHAPMAN ROAD ACROSS FROM RICHFIELD PARK) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Councilman Garvin asked to be excused from discussion because of Possible conflict of interest. Mr. Jim Keating, 6824 Little Ranch Road, appeared before the Council. Mr. Keating stated that all of the property owners in the area were contacted and all but four signed the request for the zoning change. Mr. Keating stated that the reason for requesting the zoning change was if the property was sold the purchaser would be allowed to continue to have animals. Mayor Echols stated this request would permit new owners the right to continue to have livestock. Councilman Fisher stated he thought the reason the Zoning Ordinance was passed was to prohibit livestock in the future. Mayor Echols stated there were special areas where this particular zoning could be granted and this area met the requirement. Councilman Ramsey asked about the four property owners that did not sign the request. Mayor Echols stated if they desired to change the zoning of their property they would have to come in and have their property rezoned individually. Councilman Ramsey stated he did not think that the Council went through the Master Plan process to start picking out certain areas of the City for special things. Councilman Ramsey stated he did not quite understand what he was being asked to vote on. Mr. Keating stated the lots in Morgan Meadows were either one or two acres and in the past they had livestock. Mr. Keating stated they had requested the special zoning so they could continue to keep livestock. Councilwoman Hinkle asked the number of livestock that could be kept. Mr. Royston stated there was no limit. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I .. May 12, 1986 Page 4 Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the property could only be used for private individual use and not commercial which in a sense would limit the number that could be kept. Councilman Newman stated he thought some of the houses presently there already had the special use zonings. Mayor Echols stated there was only one. Mr. Line stated that the Morgan Meadows area had historically always been able to keep livestock until the Zoning Ordinance was adopted and the zoning of the property was changed from agriculture to residential because it was determined that the lots did not meet the new requirement for agriculture. Mr. Line stated he thought this had been discussed previously before the Council and the consensus was to create this special classification. Mr. Line stated the lots had to be a minimum of one acre. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if all the tracts were at least one acre. Mr. Keating stated they were. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he felt that it should be stipulated in the ordinance that the lots would be a minimum of one acre and also the reason for the classification. Councilwoman Moody stated the same situation had existed at Green Valley Estates because of the blanket zoning that was approved. Councilwoman Moody stated it had created a situation where the owners were no longer in compliance and she felt Morgan Meadows was just being brought into compliance. Mayor Echols called for anyone Wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one else Wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 11. ORDINANCE NO. 1361 APPROVED Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve Ordinance No. 1361. Motion carried 6-0. Councilman Garvin returned to the Council table. 12. PZ 86-10 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF CHART DEVELOPMENT TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 3, NRH INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION FROM I-2 TO I-2-SU-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION (LOCATED ON A VACANT INDUSTRIAL TRACT ON THE EAST SIDE OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE AT TRINIDAD DRIVE) 'I Ie I I I I I I I P I I I I I I I {' I May 12, 1986 Page 5 Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Bryan Chandler, representing Chart Development, appeared before the Council. Mr. Chandler stated they planned to build a convenience store at this location and wished to sell beer for off-premise consumption. Mr. Chandler stated they had approximately 175 stores in the State and wished to expand to North Richland Hills. Councilwoman Moody stated that Mr. Chandler had previously asked for a special use permit for another location and nothing had been done. Mr. Chandler stated that at that time he had advised that they were planning on holding that location for future development. Mayor Echols called for anyone Wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 13. ORDINANCE NO. 1362 APPROVED Councilman Newman moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No. 1362, permit to be issued in the name of Bryan Chandler and non-transferable. Motion carried 7-0. 14. PZ 86-11 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF RHR DEVELOPMENT TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 3, NORTH RICHLAND HILLS INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION FROM 1-2 TO I-2-SU-SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF INDUSTRIAL PARK BOULEVARD A1~ RUFE SNOW DRIVE) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone Wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Bryan Chandler, representing Chart Development, stated this zoning request was located next to the convenience store and they planned on building a Mexican Restaurant. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I May 12, 1986 Page 6 15. ORDINANCE NO. 1363 APPROVED Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve Ordinance No. 1363, permit to be issued in the name of Ray Hawkins and non-transferable. Motion carried 7-0. 16. PZ 86-12 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF BLAIR PLUMBING CO. TO REZONE A PORTION OF LOT 1, COLLEGE ACRES ADDITION FROM C-1 TO C-2 (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD SOUTH OF GREEN VALLEY DRIVE) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. James Blair, owner, appeared before the Council. Mr. Blair stated he presently owned the northern 100 feet of a three hundred foot tract which was presently zoned C-2. Mr. Blair stated he wished to rezone the remainder to C-2. Mr. Blair stated he planned to build retail space with small storage in the back for contractors. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 17. ORDINANCE NO. 1364 APPROVED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve Ordinance No. 1364. Motion carried 7-0. lB. PZ 86-13 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF HEINZ AND GERTIE GERMAN RESTAURANT, INC. TO REZONE A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 50, NOR EAST ADDITION FROM C-2 TO C-2-SU-SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AT HARWOOD ROAD) Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearing and called for anyone Wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Councilwoman Moody asked to be excused from discussion because of possible conflict of interest. I Ie I I I I I I I P I I I I I I I Ie I May 12, 1986 Page 7 Mr. Heinz Pasel, owner, appeared before the Council. Mr. Pasel stated they planned on opening a German Restaurant on Davis Boulevard that would be a family type restaurant. Mayor Echols asked whose name the permit would be issued in. Mr. Pasel stated it would be in the name of Bruce Auld. Mayor Echols called for anyone Wishing to speak in OPposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearing. 19. ORDINANCE NO. 1365 APPROVED Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Ordinance No. 1365, permit to be issued in the name of Bruce Auld and non-transferable. Motion carried 6-0. Councilwoman Moody returned to the Council table. *20. PS 86-8 REQUEST OF SMITHFIELD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH FOR SHORT FORM PLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 3, SPRING MEADOWS ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHAPMAN ROAD AND SMITHFIELD ROAD) APPROVED *21. PS 86-11 REQUEST OF HANSON PROPERTIES FOR FINAL PLAT OF BLOCK 6, NOB HILL ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CRANE ROAD IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE EXISTING NOB HILL SUBDIVISION) APPROVED *22. PS 86-14 REQUEST OF JOHN KENWORTH FOR REPLAT OF LOT lOR, NORTH EDGLEY ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF KEN MICHAEL COURT AND GRAPEVINE HIGHWAY) APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I I May 12, 1986 Page 8 *23. PS 86-16 REQUEST OF J.V. FRANK AND B.J. FENIMORE FOR REPLAT OF LOTS 19R-l, 19R-2, 19R-4, BLOCK 33 HOLIDAY WEST ADDITION (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BUENOS AIRES DRIVE EAST OF RUFE SNOW DRIVE) APPROVED 24. SO 86-8 REQUEST OF MAGEE INVESTMENTS COMPANY FOR VARIANCE TO SECTION 4.2(A) OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE AT 7297-99 GLENVIRW DRIVE DENIED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to deny SO 86-8. Mr. Van Magee appeared before the Council. Mr. Magee stated he owned two businesses located at 7297-99 Glenview, Heads Up Hair Parlor and Two Timer Resale and Crafts. Mr. Magee stated his business would be dead without a sign. Mr. Magee stated there was presently a sign there but the owner of the sign would not let him put his advertisement on it. Mr. Magee stated that when he moved to this location last year there was a sign where he proposed to put the one requested. Mr. Magee stated the sign was unsightly so he took it down. Mr. Magee stated all he wanted to do was put the sign back up with his name on it. Mayor Echols stated the City understood his dilemma but the sign was removed and Mr. Magee was subject to the Sign Ordinance. Mr. Magee stated that the sign was very important to his business. Councilman Newman asked if Mr. Magee lacked only a few feet meeting the requirements of the Sign Ordinance. Mayor Echols stated the property was only 94 feet in width so it was a little shy for the existing sign. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked Mr. Magee if he could put a sign on the face of the building. Mr. Magee stated there were no other signs along this part of Glenview. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that in the near future when Glenview Drive was widened he felt there would be more signs. Councilwoman Moody stated that there was a large sign on the east end of the building that was not easy to miss. Councilwoman Moody stated she felt the problem was not with the Council granting the request but with the owner enforcing equal rights among his tenants. I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I May 12, 1986 Page 9 Motion carried 6-1; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilmen Ramsey, Garvin, Fisher, and Councilwomen Hinkle and Moody voting for and Councilman Newman voting against. 25. GN 86-42 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF 1986 SERIES REVENUE BONDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,120,000, ORDINANCE NO. 1366 APPROVED Mr. Harold McInroe, First Southwest, appeared before the Council. Mr. McInroe there were four bids received and the recommendation was that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Raucher Pierce Refsnes, Inc. and Associates. Mr. McInroe stated this would be a net effective interest rate of 7.635414 percent. Mr. McInroe stated it was his recommendation that the City accept the bid. Mayor Echols asked Mr. McInroe to state the purpose of the bonds. Mr. McInroe stated the purpose was for improvements to the water and sewer system. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to accept the bid of Raucher Pierce Refsnes, Inc. and Associates. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 1366. Motion carried 7-0. 26. GN 86-43 APPROVING THE PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR AGREEMENT WITH TEXAS AMERICAN BANK FORT WORTH, RESOLUTION NO. 86-22 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to approve Resolution No. 86-22. Motion carried 7-0. 27. GN 86-44 REQUEST BY FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTIST FOR WAIVER OF WATER LINE AND FIRE HYDRANT CONSTRUCTION DENIED Mayor Echols presented the following: "The site on which the subject church building is proposed to be built is on the 1820 Service Road between Karen and Marilyn Drives. This property was I Ie I I I I I I I f' I I I I I I ~ I I May 12, 1986 Page 10 originally intended to be used for residential purposes, and the water system installed for residential purposes does not even meet the requirements for residential developments by todays' standards, much less commercial development. There is one 2" line that runs in front of these lots and there is a 6" line that runs beside the lots. Approximately 200 feet to the east there is an 8" line that should be extended parallel to the 2" line to the site, and tied into a 6" line which is approximately 350 feet long. This would be about 550 to 600 feet of 8" line that would have to be installed, along with another fire hydrant so that the site would have the proper fire coverage for development other than residential. The total cost is estimated to be in the neighborhood of $8,000." Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Fisher, to deny GN 86-44. Ms. Sher Butler, Chairman of the Building Committee, appeared before the Council. Ms. Butler stated their present building was located at 7904 Bedford Euless Road. Ms. Butler stated they had acquired five lots across the street from the present complex where they planned to build a new church. Ms. Butler stated that when a board member contacted the City on the adequacy of the utilities they were assured the present six inch water main would be satisfactory. Ms. Butler stated that in the course of their engineering preparation they learned that they must comply with the zoning rules required for a commercial establishment. Ms. Butler stated this evidently required all property to be within three hundred feet of a fire hydrant serviced by an eight inch main. Ms. Butler stated there presently was a fire plug on a six inch main and a portion of one of the lots was not within three hundred feet. Ms. Butler stated a rough estimate of the cost of an eight inch main was between $26,000 and $29,000. Ms. Butler stated the nearest eight inch they could connect to was on Cummings Street. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated he had conflicting figures. Ms. Butler stated the nearest eight inch main was 750 feet away and the City Staff stated it was only 200 feet. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he would like a clarification on the figures. Mr. Riddle stated the nearest eight inch was less than three hundred feet away. Ms. Carol Knapper, Woodward and Associates, appeared before the Council. Ms. Knapper stated their engineer had indicated that they could not connect from a six inch main to an eight inch main and that the only two eight inch mains were on Cummings and the street to the west. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the Public Works Director had said it was less than 300 feet and that would cut the cost in half. I Ie I I I I I I I f' I I I I I I '- I I May 12, 1986 Page 11 Mr. Riddle stated that if scaled on the map there were three lots from Marilyn to Cummings and the lots were approximately 70 feet wide plus the width of Marilyn Street. Mr. Riddle stated thee was an eight inch line in Cummings and the cost of laying the pipe would be abut $10.00 a foot. Councilman Fisher stated he was confused on the cost because his information stated the cost would be about $8,000. Mayor Echols asked Ms. Knapper what their estimate was based on. Ms. Knapper stated their engineer's estimate included boring of the street because they could not trench and boring any driveways in the right of way plus an extra fire hydrant. Mayor Echols stated he hoped they understood that the whole purpose of this requirement was for protection of those in attendance at church. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he sympathized with the Church but this had to be looked at as a development and the purpose was for public safety. Councilman Garvin stated there seemed to be a big discrepancy in what the applicant's engineer was saying and Mr. Riddle. Councilman Garvin stated that perhaps they needed to have their engineer talk with Mr. Riddle. Mayor Echols asked Mr. Riddle if it was required to bore the street. Mr. Riddle stated they could make a street cut. Motion to deny carried 7-0. Councilman Davis moved to divert from the Agenda and recognize Boy Scout Troop 434. Scout Master, Troop 434, advised the Council that the young men here tonight were working towards their citizenship in a community, one of the merit badges they were required to have. He stated that because of the time they did have to leave. *28. GN 86-45 APPOINTMENT OF REPRESENTATIVE TO CONET, RESOLUTION NO. 86-23 APPROVED 29. GN 86-46 REQUEST OF ENGLER ESTATE FOR VARIANCE TO SECTION 2-06-B(14) OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE CHANNELS (LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WATAUGA ROAD WEST OF THE ST. LOUIS AND SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD) DENIED Mr. Ron Morrison, representing the applicant, appeared before the Council. I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I May 12, 1986 Page 12 Mr. Morrison stated he was requesting a variance to allow construction of an earthen lined channel in the area between Watauga Road and St. Louis & Southwestern Railroad. Mr. Morrison stated the Drainage Ordinance required a concrete lined channel and in this particular case he felt it might not be appropriate. Mr. Morrison stated that up stream to the north was concrete lined and it was primarily a residential area, the area on the other side of the railroad was earthen lined and to the south of the property was earthen lined. Mr. Morrison stated that in his professional opinion the City and the client would be best serviced with an earthen lined channel with a concrete pilot channel in the bottom. Mr. Morrison presented the Council with a copy of the study made on this particular area. Councilman Fisher stated that a lot of thought went into the City's Subdivision Ordinance, particularly concrete lined channels versus earthen channels. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that in looking at the total over all project, look at how many concrete channels the City had to built because some developer did not want to do it. Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked Mr. Morrison if he was planning to build the channel at this time. Mr. Morrison stated they had no plans to do it at the present time. After further discussion Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to deny GN 86-46. Motion carried 7-0. 30. GN 86-47 LIBRARY/COMMUNITY CENTER CONSTRUCTION & MOVE IN COSTS POSTPONED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to table GN 86-47. Motion carried 7-0. 31. GN 86-48 APPOINTMENT OF ALTERNATE TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, to appoint George Tucker as Alternate to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Motion carried 7-0. 32. GN 86-49 APPOINTMENT TO PARKS & RECREATION BOARD POSTPONED I Ie I I I I I I I t' I I I I I I l- I I May 12, 1986 Page 13 Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to table GN 86-49 until June 9th. Motion carried 7-0. *33. PU 86-15 BID AWARD TO SHARROCK ELECTRIC FOR ONE OPTICOM SYSTEM IN THE AMOUNT OF $140,263 AND TRANSFER OF FUNDS APPROVED *34. PU 86-16 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING REPORT APPROVED *35. PW 86-15 DRAINAGE AGREEMENT WITH THE ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, RESOLUTION NO. 86-21 APPROVED *36. PW 86-16 CHANGE ORDER #4 - CHAPMAN DRIVE PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,340 APPROVED *37. PW 86-17 ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO NEW MUNICIPAL COMPLEX APPROVED 38. CITIZEN PRESENTATION None 39. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL, LIBRARY BOARD, PARK AND RECREATION BOARD AND CABLE TV BOARD, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820, JUNE 3, 1986 - 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Echols called the meeting to order June 3, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Marie Hinkle Virginia Moody Harold Newman Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilwoman Councilman Members of the Library Board Members of the Park & Recreation Board Members of the Cable TV Board Staff: Rodger N. Line Dennis Horvath Lee Maness Dave Petika Arlita Hallam City Manager Assistant City Manager Finance Director Parks & Recreation Director Library Director Absent: Mack Garvin Jim Ramsey Councilman Councilman 3. MOVE-IN COST FOR RECREATION CENTER AND LIBRARY INTO NEW BUILDING After a lengthy discussion of move-in and equipment costs, Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the move-in costs as listed on the two attachments with the following items added to the Parks move-in expenses: 1) Beam 2) Uneven Parallel Bars 3) PummelI Horse/Vault 4) Additional Scoreboard 5) Rowing Machine 6) Exercise Cycle $1,300 1,862 1,248 1,400 450 1,400 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I June 3, 1986 Page 2 and to approve the revised financing plan outlined in the attached memo from Finance Director Maness, with the stipulation that the additional $8,500 required for added items be provided from anticipated interest income. Motion carried 5-0. The meeting was adjourned. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I -- I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I City of J\9rth Richland Hills, Texas June 3, 1986 TO: Rodger N. Line FINM-0026-86 FROM: Lee Maness SUBJECT: Alternatives to Finance Recreation/Library Construction and Move In Costs Per your request, a comprehensive review of fiscal year 1985/86 budget savings and other alternatives were completed as a means to finance the Recreation/ Library construction and movè-in costs. Those alternatives are itemized as follows: A. Starnes Street Fire Station Facilities - Initially funds were appropriated to purchase a larger tract of land to construct the fire station and sell off the excess property as needed. As a result a savings of $115,286 of Unspecified CIP Building Funds is available. B. Current year 1985/86 Operating Budget'- During the budget process for fiscal year 1986/87 a comprehensive analysis of estimated expenditures and revenues are projected to September 30, 1986. That review projects anticipated revenues to be approximately $180,000 above budgeted numbers and projected expenditures to be approximately $420,000 less than budgeted expenditures for a total savings of $600,000. Revise Funding Source 1. Current 1985 Series GO Bond Funds Available $ 734,380 2. Park Bond Funds (Transferred 1/13/86) 153,257 3. Park & Library Funds (Donations from Utility Customers) 30,000 4. Budget Savings (Per Item B Above) 600,000 5. Unspecified CIP Building Funds (Item A Above) 115,286 Total Available $1,632,923 (817) 281·0041/1301 N,E. lOOP H20/P,O, BOX 18609/NORTH RICHlAND HillS, TX 76118 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I As indicated above, the alternative financing will not use any of Unspecified CIP Funds available for Street and Drainage. It is my recommendation that consideration be given as an alternative means of financing the Recreation/Library Facilities. 4 ì11~ Lee Maness I. PARKS MOVE IN -- Item Total $ Item Total $ I Function Requested Requested Recommended Recommended EQUIPMENT 2 Volleyball Nets 250 250 I 2 Umpire Stands 500 500 Gym Divider 5,000 -0- Beam 1,300 -0- Uneven Parallel 1,862 -0- I 12 Mats 1,608 1,608 Mat Dolly 75 75 Crash Mat 454 454 I Pummell Horse/Vault 1,248 -0- Spring Board 400 400 Indoor Soccer 450 450 I Badmitten Set 40 40 Floor Tape Machine 50 50 2 Dual Score Boards 2,800 1 Board 1,400 50 Folding Tables 7,500 10 Tables 500 I 10 Table Racks 1,000 1 Rack 100 400 Folding Chairs 4,100 100 Chairs 1,200 10 Chair Dollies 900 2 Dollies 180 I 25 Card Tables 750 10 Tables 300 2 Post Chalk Boards 300 1 Board 150 30 Stackable Chairs 900 -0- P Sub Total 31,487 7,657 WEIGHT 2 Bulletin Boards 100 1 Board 50 I ROOM Free Weight Set 520 520 Free Weight Racks 350 350 Weight Machine 8,900 8,900 I Dumbbell Rack 450 450 Rowing Machine 450 -0- Exercise Cycle 1,400 -0- Scales 275 275 I Dumbbell Set 500 500 Sub Total 12,945 11,045 I GAME Table Games 2,000 1,000 ROOM PP Ball Dispenser 100 100 Foosball Table 400 -0- I Ping Pong Table 1,930 1,930 Pool Table 2,000 -0- Sub Total 6,430 3,030 I GYM Balls/Games 950 200 EQUIPMENT League Balls 560 300 Ball Cart 40 40 It Minor Equip./Supplies 2,000 500 Sub Total 3,550 1,040 AEROBICS Stereo System 750 750 I 750 750 I . I, PARKS MOVE IN Ia Item Total $ Item Total $ I Function Requested Requested Recommended Recommended MARTIAL ARTS 12 Floor Mats 1,600 6 Mats 800 Kick Bag 250 250 I Sub Total 1,850 1,050 1 CRAFTS Ceramics Molds 950 (See Note 1) -0- Kiln 1,350 -0- Bulletin Board 50 -0- I Sub Total 2,350 DANCE Piano 3,500 (See Note 2) -0- I Stereo System 750 750 Sub Total 4,250 750 I KITCHEN Ice Machine 2,000 2,000 Coffee Machine 100 100 1 Microwave 250 250 Sub Total 2,350 2,350 . BREAK Refrigerator 950 950 ROOM Microwave 250 -0- Couch 600 600 I Table 100 100 5 Chairs 100 100 Sub Total 2,000 1,750 I REC. SUPER. Office Equipment 12,819 (See Note 3) -0- Sub Total 12,819 I DIRECTOR'S (See Note 4) Misc. Off. Equip. 2,721 -0- I OFFICE (Chairs, Credenza, 2,721 Lamps, etc.) I SEC. OFFICE Table 148 148 Sub Total 148 148 I COMPUTER IBM PC/Software 4,500 (See Note 5) -0- Sub Total 4,500 , TOTAL $88,150 $29,570 I I I· -- I I I I I I 1 . I I I I I I i I I - PARKS (1) Usage is questionable - can be purchased later. (2) Available through donation. (3) Position not recommended at this time. (4) Fully furnished at this time. (5) Currently have 1 PC. The purchase of this equipment can be delayed one year. I LIBRARY MOVE IN -- Item Total $ Item Total $ I Function Requested Requested Recommended Recommended MOVE IN Mover Costs $ 5,000 Mover $ 5,000 Shelving Instal. 3,780 Installation 3,780 I Sub Total 8,780 8,780 I COMPUTER 1 IBM 36 62,100 1 IBM 36 62,100 7 Terminals 7,700 2 Terminals 2,200 2 Wands 4,000 1 Wand 2,000 I Tape Drive 15,860 (See note 1) -0- High Speed Printer 17,059 -0- Maintenance 5,000 5,000 Supplies 2,500 2,500 I 3 Tables 450 450 1 PC 7,000 -0- Installation 1,000 1,000 I Cable Atch. 348 100 Fire Res. Safe 150 150 Sub Total 123,167 75,500 I FURNITURE File Cabinet 275 275 2 Book Bins 1,300 1,300 , 3 Book Trucks 570 2 Trucks 380 44 Children's Chairs 880 20 Chairs 400 7 Children's Tables 700 3 Tables 300 16 Study Carrels 6,400 5 Carrels 1,600 I 2 Step Stools 60 60 2 File Cabinets 550 -0- 1 Book Truck 190 -0- 60 Chairs 1,200 40 Chairs 807 I 2 Couches 2,000 1 Couch 800 2 Lateral Files 1,000 -0- Paper Supplies (Crafts) 407 -0- I 4 Folding Tables 400 -0- 6 Casual Seats 3,000 2 Seats 700 1 Index Tables 1,000 1,000 I Dictionary Stand 325 325 Atlas Stand 750 750 10 Reader Tables 3,500 10 Tables 3,500 10 Reading Lamps 750 2 Lamps ($50 ea. ) 100 I 80 Reading Chairs 16,000 80 Chairs 16,000 13 Study Carrels 5,200 13 Carrels 5,200 8 Love Seats 8,000 -0- I 2 File Cabinets 550 1 File Cabinet 275 6 Typing Chairs 1,500 3 Typing Chairs 750 16 Chairs - Mult.Pur. 3,200 8 Chairs 800 2 Mult. Pur. Tables 800 1 Table 400 , 150 Stacking Chairs 1,500 75 Chairs 750 20 Auditorum Tables 2,000 6 Tables 600 10 Chair Dollies 500 -0- I 2 Table Dollies 200 -0- I I -- I Function FURNITURE I (Con't) I I I I I . I I I I Sub Total I SHELVING Sub Total I BOOKS , Sub Total I I - LIBRARY MOVE IN Item Requested Total $ Requested Item Recommended Total $ Recommended 1 Lecturn Microphone 750 750 2 Library Directories 2,200 1 Directory 1,700 1 Newspaper Display 400 -0- 12 Waste Baskets 300 6 Waste Baskets 150 4 Clocks 200 2 Clocks 100 Mail Room Furniture 1,237 1,237 2 Mail Sort Bins 452 452 1 Mailing Machine 3,179 3,179 1 Electronic Scale 2,525 2,525 1 Heavy Duty Dolly 85 85 4 File Cabinets 1,100 1 Fire Cabinet 275 Media Board 350 350 Volunteer Cord. Desk 700 700 Volunteer Cord. Typew. 1,200 1,200 Volunteer Cord. Chair 250 250 Refreshment Center 425 -0- 25 Conference Chairs 11,250 (See Note 2) -0- 2 Love Seats 2,000 -0- 2 Casual Chairs 1,000 1 Chair 500 File Cabinet 275 -0- Clock 50 -0- Film Cabinet 500 500 2 Filmstrip Cabinet 900 1 Cabinet 450 2 Cassette Panel 600 1 Panel 300 2 Reader Printer Carrel 800 800 12 Chairs Sec. 3,000 6 Chairs 1,500 2 Stools 200 1 Stool 100 1 Storage Cabinet 300 -0- 3 Used Chairs/Couches 300 -0- 8 Wet Carrels 3,200 4 Wet Carrels 1,600 2 Computer Carrels 1,160 1,160 1 File Cabinet 275 -0- 6 Floor Lamps 600 2 Lamps 200 10 Occasional Tables 3,000 -0- 1 Portable Lecturn 725 725 2 Flag Poles 300 300 110,495 58,160 90" Shelving-lighted 172,500 (See Note 3) 63,000 172,500 63,000 1,120 Additional Bks. 11,200 (See Note 4) -0- 117 Audio Visual 4,964 (See Note 4) -0- 16,164 I· ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I ¡ I I LIBRARY MOVE IN Item Total $ Item Total $ Function Requested Requested Recommended Recommended AUDIO 16MM Projector 1,400 1,400 VISUAL (For Story hr.) VCR Monitor 950 950 16MM Projector 1,100 1,100 (Auditorium) 16MM Projectors 1,100 -0- (Preview) 2 Film Strip Proj. 300 1 Projector 150 3 Carry Cases 75 1 Case 25 2 VCR Monitors A/V 1,900 1 Monitor 950 5 Puppet/Propr. 200 200 Amega & Perepherals 3,000 -0- 2 Vidio Patch Sys. 1,500 1 System 750 2 Sigma Alignment Cds. 750 1 Card 375 2 Video Monitor Cables 1,800 1 Monitor 900 Video Insp./Cleaner 3,300 -0- Sub Total 17,375 6,800 THEFT DETECTION SYSTEM 16,516 (See Note 5) -0- Sub Total 16,516 TOTAL ONE-TIME EXPENSES $464,997 $212,240 I· · -- I I I I I I I . LIBRARY (1) Purchase of this tape drive system can be delayed . (2) Board Room furnishings can wait. Pre-Council room available for Library Board Meetings. (3) 90' lighted shelving, 18 ranges of 7 double-faced sections. Adequate flat wiring is included in construction cost to allow for additional shelving. (4) Additional books and AV material will be in Operating Budget. (5) Needed but can wait. I I I I I I , I I ~ ~ I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: Request of Estate of Louis Engler and Nettye PZ 86 9 Agenda Number: - Freeman Engler for Rezoning 0 Tract , ates Survey, Abstract 1753, Tract 1, D.H. Hightower Survey, Abstract 1891, and Tract 20, H.W. Cook Survey, Abstract 366, from AG to C-2 Ordinance No. i368 - Council Meeting Date: 6/9/86 This Zoning Application is presented on the vacant agriculture tract located on the south side of Watauga Road immediately west of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad and immediately east of the City Service Center Tract. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to C-2 Commercial. The applicants stated intent is to develop and/or sell the property for a commercial venture. The Staff noted to the Commission several items for consideration. 1. The City of North Richland Hills is currently proceeding with the design of~ improvements to Watauga Road adjacent to the subject tract. In addition the City is negotiating for the necessary right of way along the street needed to make the improvements. The City's right of way agent has been in contact with the representative of the property owners to request the dedication of the right of way. The Staff noted that the applicant would be requested to provide the street dedication as a condition of platting if the property is developed. 2. The western boundary of the subject tract is contiguous with the east boundary of the City Service Center Site. The City has been pursuing the future construction of a thoroughfare along that common boundary which would serve both the City's property and the subject tract. This proposed street would also extend south across the railroad and connect with the existing Industrial Park Boulevard. The proposed street is to be a four lane undivided street of 48 feet of pavement with a needed right of way of 68 feet. The subject property will be responsible for one-half of the right of way and one-half of the street construction costs. 3. The existing channel of Calloway Branch bisects the subject tract. Any development of the property will require the improvement of this channel. The representative ~f the applicant has made a request to the City Council to deviate from the Subdivision Ordinance requirements that the channel be fully concrete lined. The City Council denied that request and indicated that the Subdivision Ordinance must be adhered to in the development of the channel. k/lþl(/~ 0' ent Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Frnance Director Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget e Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available - Paqe 1 of 2 I I I I I I I I RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zonning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-9 requesting rezoning on Tract 4, J.C. Yates Survey, Abstract 1753, Tract 1, D.H. Hightower Survey, Abstract 1891, and Tract 2D, H.W. Cook Survey, Abstract 336, from AG to C-2 be denied. This hearing before the City Council is in appeal of that denial. I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Page 2 of 2 -. I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I t I ~ ~ Page 3 P & Z Minutes April 10, 1986 ( ( Mr. Keating stated their primar interest was that if they w to sell their property, they w still be allowed to have an Chairman en called for those wish to speak in opposition to this quest to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 86-8. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. 3. PZ 86-9 Request of the Estate of Louis Engler & Nettye Freeman Engler to rezone Tract 4, John C. Yates Survey, Abstract 1753, Tract 1, D.H. Hightower Survey, Abstract 1891, and Tract 2D, H.W. Cook Survey, Abstract 366, from their present classification of AG (Agriculture) to C-2 (Commercial). This property is located at the southwest corner of Watauga Road and the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Phil Welch came forward to represent to owners of the property. He said they had owned this property since 1955, one half being owned by the estate and one half being owned by Mrs. Engler. Mr. Welch stated that there is a major drainage problem which they plan to correct in the next year or two by the time the new road is finished. He said they need to obtain this zoning. Mr. Welch stated they do not have an immediate sale for the property, but they wish to get the zoning approved so they can have the I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I t I Page 4 P & Z Minutes April 10, 1986 ( ( so they can have the engineering and drainage in place when the road is finished. Mr. Wood asked if they have anyone in mind to sell the property to. Mr. Welch stated they do not have an immediate sale for the property, but they will work on the drainage after they get the zoning. Mr. Wood asked how does the drainage and the road affect the zoning of the property. Mr. Welch said they do not intend to sell the property for residential. Mr. Wood asked if they could use C-l instead of C-2. Mr. Welch stated he had not checked the C-l zoning classification out. He said he felt it would take 6 to 8 months to correct the drainage. Mr. Wood said he was not sure why it would be necessary to change the zoning now. He said he felt that to go from Agriculture to C-2 Commercial was speculative. Mr. Welch asked Mr. Royston what the difference was in C-l and C-2. Mr. Royston said C-l was primarily retail. He said C-l is basicly inside, C-2 is outside. He said C-l would allow a mall and C-2 would allow a contractor's or sales warehouse. Mr. Wood stated that on the application it asks the proposed use which you left blank. ~ Mr. Welch said they do not have an immediate use today and he does not feel they could have a sale until the road is finished. I -- I I I I I I I lit I I I I I I I f I I... t Page 5 p & Z Minutes April 10, 1986 ~ ( ( Chairman Bowen said zoning is based on the highest and best Use of the land. Mr. Welch asked what would be the best use. Chairman Bowen said he was not sure, he said it is speculative, C-2 has such a wide use. Mr. Welch said most of the land along Watauga Road is already zoned couunercial. Chairman Bowen said only a small area is zoned C-2, but most of the land is zoned Multi-Family. Mr. Welch asked the Commission if they would agree to C-l. Mr. Wood said he was not sure, but he hated to see it go from AG to C-2. Mr. Royston stated the Commission can only act on the C-2 request, but if they deny, they could recommend C-l. Mr. Wood said he would not recommend either just so they could get a higher price for the property. Mr. Welch said the city had planned to put a City Service Center on the property and have been in court on it. Chairman Bowen said Mr. Welch was digressing from the request, the only issue is should it be rezoned. Mr. Welch said if the city had a use for it, they would have thought it was right. Mr. Wood stated Mr. Welch does not have a use for it at this time. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I Page 6 p & Z Minutes April 10, 1986 PZ 86-9 DENIED 4. PZ 86-10 PZ 86-10 APPROVED ( ( There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hallford made the motion to deny PZ 86-9. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 5-0. Request of Chart Development to rezone a portion of Tract 3, NRH Industrial Park Addition, from its present classification of 1-2 (Industrial) 0 1-2-Specific Use-Sale of Beer fa off premise consumption. This pr erty is located at the northeast co er of Trinidad and Rufe Snow Dr Chairman Bowen opene the Public Hearing and called or those wishing to speak in favo of this request to please come ard. 1600 Airport Freeway, came forward to repre nt Chart Development. He sta d this would be a convenience re with gasoline pumps. Chairman Bowen stated, if approved, the City Council would need the name of an individual for the Specific Use. Mr. Chandler said they would have one. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-10. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Wood voting against. ~ I' .', Ie I I I I I I I lit I I I I I I I f I ( \ r KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas Ma r c h 19, 1 986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING C~?E PI 86-9 REVIEW LETTER, ]ONING FROM AG TO C-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 86 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council, RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Publ ic lvorks Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 86-9 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I . ORDINANCE NO. 1368 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-9 the following described property shall be ' rezoned from AG to C-2. A tract or parcel of land situated in Tarrant County, Texas, being 28.19 acre~ of land out of the John C. Yates, D. H. Hightower and H. W. Cook Surveys, more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a point, said point being the intersection of the North line of St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad right-of-way, and the South right-of-way line of County Road project #3022, said intersection point being 25 feet South of D. H. Hightower's North Survey line; THENCE North 89 degrees 30 minutes West with South right-of-way line of County Road project #3022 and at 958 feet passing the West line of D. H. Hightower Survey and the East line of the John C. Yates Survey line, in all 2294.0 feet to stake for corner; THENCE South 0 degrees 30 minutes West with fence line 1070.5 feet to stake for corner in the North right-of-way line of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad; THENCE North 65 degrees 30 minutes East with North right-of-way line of St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad 2531.20 feet to stake for corner and point of beginning; and being that same tract of land conveyed to Thurman R. Bemis and wife, Nettie Mae Bemis by John McCarthy and wife, Mary McCarthy, in deed dated December 7, 1949 recorded in Volume 2146, Page 313, Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I Ie I I ~ Page 2 This property is located at the southwest corner of Watauga Road and the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad. DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 10th DAY OF APRIL, 1986. c ZONING COMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-9 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF , 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPRÐVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: 6/9/86 Subject: Council Meeting Date: Request of Harwood Plaza Apartments--Joint Venture A d N b to Rezone a Port10n ot Lot 2, Hlock 2, Walker ' s Branch gen a urn er: Addition from R-7 MF to C-l Ordinance No. 1369 PZ 86-14 This Zoning Application is presented on the property located on the northwest corner of Emerald Hills Way and Grapevine Highway. The requested rezoning is from R-7 MF Multi-Family to C-l Commercial. The applicant's stated intent is to add additional property for the expansion of the commercial activity on the west side of Emerald Hills Way. The existing commercial strip center, Harwood Plaza, also belongs to the applicant. The Staff noted that the subject property is adjacent to the channel of Walker Branch. However, in the earlier development of the property around the subject tract the applicant had improved the channel to provide the 100 year capacity in the channel~ RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-14 requesting rezoning on a portion of Lot 2, Block 2, Walkers Branch Addition from R-7 MF to C-1 be approved. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available RIJV~ I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director PaQe 1 of 1 \ \ I . , I I I I I , I I \ , \ , , , I I I I I I , , , . I I , \ I-I \ \ \ \ I \ AG: \ F:~~ I I · I I , \ AG I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -- I I ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAs MAY 8, 1986 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF APRIL 24, 1986 1. PS 86-20 PS 86-20 APPROVED 2. PS 86-21 3. PZ 86-14 PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Member Alt. Member Dir. Planning/Dev. p & Z Coordinator The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P. M. Don Bowen John Sc Joe H ford Car e Flippo R hard Royston anda Calvert ABSENT: Mark Wood Marjorie Nash Chairman Bo they would have to postpo the approval of the minutes ince there are only two prese that were present at the April 24 meeting. Request of Jack Roseberry for replat of Lots 2R-2A & 2R-2B, Block 13, Meadowview Estates. Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PS 86-20. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Chart Development for replat of Tracts 3A, 3B, & 3C, NRH Industrial Park Addition. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PS 86-21 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Harwood Plaza Apartment Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Lot 2, Block 2, Walkers Branch Addition, from its present classification of R-7-MF (Multi-Family) to C-l (Commercial). This property is located on Grapevine Highway at Emerald Hills Way. I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I Page 2 P & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 PZ 86-14 APPROVED 4. PZ 86-15 ( ( Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Bobby McMillan came forward to represent Harwood Plaza Joint Venture which is owned by him and Robert Folsom. He said they were requesting this change from multi-family to commercial for a future phase of their shopping center. Mr. McMillan said he felt this was the highest and best us~ of the property. He said they plan to build Phase 3 of their shopping center. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-14. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo. Chairman Bowen stated he felt Commercial zoning would be better than Multi-Family zoning. The motion carried 4-0. Request of Sigmor Corporation to rezone a portion of Lots 1, 2, , Parkers Subdivision, from · s present classification of C- ommercial) to C-1-Specific U ale of Beer for off premise c mption. This property is 'loea at 6877 Grapevine Highway. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. ~ Barbara Gamache, representative of Sigmor Beverage Company, came forward. , I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -- I I ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas April 22, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas /6118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-14 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-7-MF TO C-1 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 116 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate tnis property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. r¿¡uW, RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of PUDlic Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 8b-14 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL 0 R., su ITE 550 · BEDFO RD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/26 7-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I ORDINANCE NO. 1369 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-14 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-7-MF to C-1. The following described tract or parcel of land being a portion of Lot 2, Block 2, Walker Branch Addition, to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas according to plat recorded on Page 22 of Volume 388-154 in the Tarrant County Plat Records and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an old iron rod at the Southeast corner of said Lot 2 and being in the North right-of-way line of State Highway No. 26 (a 100.0 foot R.O.W.); THENCE South 44 degrees 41 minutes 49 seconds West along the North R.O.W. line of said State Highway No. 26 a distance of 490.66 feet and being on a curve having a radius of 1077.44 whose center bears North 44 degrees 46 minutes 42 seconds East a distance of 1077.44; THENCE Northwesterly along said curve and through a central angle of 15 degrees 11 minutes 49 seconds a distance of 285.78 feet; THENCE North 30 degrees 01 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of 118.04 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 760.33 feet; THENCE Northwesterly along said curve and through a central angle of 9 degrees 37 minutes 14 seconds a distance of 127.67 feet; THENCE North 44 degrees 41 minutes 49 seconds East a distance of 899.68 feet to the East line of said Lot 2; THENCE South 0 degrees 01 minutes 39 seconds West along the East line of said Lot 2 a distance of 734.0 feet to place of beginning, containing 8.437 acres or 367,501 square feet of land. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I Page 2 This property is located at on Grapevine Highway at Emerald Hills Way. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF MAY, 1986. C , ~ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-14 IS HEREBY REZONED C-1 THIS 9th DAY OF JUNE, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY "1 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I _Department: SUbject: I I I I I I Planning and Development 6/9/86 - Council Meeting Date: Request of Sigmor Corporation to Rezone a Portion ot Lots 1, z, and 3, ¥arkers Subdivision from C-1 to C-1 SU Ordinance No. 1370 PZ 86-15 Agenda Number: This Zoning Application is presented on the existing service station site located at 6877 Grapevine Highway on the northwest corner of Scruggs Drive. The requested rezoning is from C-I Commercial to C-I SU Commercial Specific Usè-Sale of Beer for Off-Premises Consumption. The applicants propose to renovate the existing service station to include a convenience store and propose to sell package beer with their grocery sales. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-15 requesting rezoning on a portion of Lots I, 2, and 3, Parkers Subdivision from C-Ito C-1 SUe Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) e gperating Budget Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available If IJIl /- ~' , - City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Paqe 1 of 1 tII, I ..~ . "... L R S' U .~ IF ~u-po I 1144 I I I ISou. R- FP c -!, I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I Page 2 P & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 ( 4. PZ 86-15 ~ ( Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wish to speak in favor of this reque please come forward. Bobby McMillan came forw to represent Harwood Plaz Joint Venture which is owned by hi and Robert Folsom. He said t y were requesting this change fro ulti-family to commercial fo a future phase of their shopping ce Mr. McMillan said he felt this as the highest and best us~ of the roperty. He said they plan to buil hase 3 of their shopping Chairman Bowen called for those Wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-14. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo. Chairman Bowen stated he felt Commercial zoning would be better than Mul'ti~Family zoning. The motion carried 4-0. Request of Sigmor Corporation to rezone a portion of Lots 1, 2, & 3, Parkers Subdivision, from its present classification of C-l (Commercial) to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. This property is located at 6877 Grapevine Highway. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. .. -- Barbara Gamache, representative of Sigmor Beverage Company, came forward. ~ f #. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I_~_.. . Page 3 p & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 ( PZ 86-15 APPROVED 5. PZ 86-16 ( Chairman Bowen asked if they plan to renovate this service station. He said as it stands now, it does not meet the requirements to sell beer. Ms. Gamache said they were. She showed drawings and photos of the proposed convenience store and service station. Chairman Bowen said it would meet the ordinance. Mr. Royston stated the beer permit would not be issued until they met the ordinance. --- ....-- Mr. Schwinger said he trades at this station and it looks like there is more property in the pictures. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PZ 86-15. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Request of The Cambridge Companies Inc. to rezone Lot 3, Block 1 Northpark Plaza Addition ase 2, from its present cl 1fication of C-I (Commercial) -2 (Commercial). This pro y is located on the east si Rufe Snow Drive, approximately 5 feet north of Watauga-Smithfield Road. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. - - I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -- I I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas April 22, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLANO HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-15 REVIEW LETTER, ZOrJ I NG FROr~ C-l TO C-1-SU REF. UTilITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 157 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. R\~A/ ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, Clty Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Dlrector of PuDlic Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development ? Zoning Review PZ 86-15 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I · . I :.:- I- , ,'';: i. . - ~: .. .. ~ 1 t I' ,- II ~ -, - ; ': . . . .; I, - 1 .._ . I ::. - f ~~ i: ',. I- -. - . . P I_- I! ,- ~~ ~i : - .- I· - ~ · .. f.;,; .-. . i., : I' ~ *;~. - -:-~ . . .:- p ': ... :. -.. - I} :~~ t_ I .: .. - .,. - 1- -" . .' . ~~.~.¡¿ - ~ =- ~.- - ------ - -. - - - -- -- · .. · ; . (", . f Z- g~-/5 APRIL 15. 1~86 ~ ,- ~ fJELD NOTES -- --. - t .-~ hing the Southea$ttr11 pottiOÐ of Lots \ and 2 and the Sovthe,"" portion of Lot 3. Parkars Subdivision in t~ City of North R1çhl1nd H111" 1arrant County. Texas, IS recorded in Vo1ume 338':Q. Page 457 t of the Deed and Pl,t Records of Tarrant County, TexIs. end be1ng IDOre part tcul.r11 described as f0110W5: · 8E&INN1HG It a ·Pk- nei1 set on the West R.O.W. 'tne of Scruggs Drive for the North- ..,to corner of this tract ~scr1bed herein, said point being South O· 34' 35- West .1ong the West R.O.W~ line': of Scruggs Drive 67.73 feet from the 1Qtersection of the South R.O.W. liñe of Ltnma Street and the Nest R.O.W. t1ne of Scruvgs Drive; tHENCE. South O· 34' 35" West. .1ong the West R.O.V. 11ne of· Scruggs Dr1vt 61.)1 feet to . .- iron pin found at the intersection of the West R.O.W. 1in, of Scrug9s Or'Yt and the Northwest R.O.W. liRe of Grapevine H1ghw., (Stete H1ghw&1 No. 26) for an Ingle point of said tract described herein; THENCE. South 48· 00' West with the Rorthwest R.O.W. Una of Grapevine Highway. \90.2 feat \0 . '" iron pin set for the ItOst Southeastern corner of this tract descrtbtd herein; .. · ~:.~~ .;., . .. : t; ~ ~- .. -~ -- - . .-~ -~ ". .~- - - ,- .:~ THENCE, departing sa'd R.O.W. line North 31· 56' West genera11y atong a concrete retaining wal' and fencel1ne 136.86 feet to a j- iron pin set for the ~$t Wester1y cornet of this tract; 1HEftCE. North 47- 59· 15" fast end genere11y along a concrete .an, 118.02 feet to . ¡- iron pin set for the Northwest corner of tbis tract; THENCE, South 89° 51' East, generlHy .1ong a concrete .en \26.14 feet to the 'Oliff OF B£GIMN1RG and containing 0.575 of In acre (25,062.47 sq. ft.) of land.. I G~lord t. R.aves Registered Pub1tc Surveyor - No·. 3501 Job No. A- 6989 ~ ...~ ".. i: ..:.. ~ 'J --. . . . .. .... - . ...~.". . .. . . .... .. - -- .~ ~... - - ." - - .- _.- . - - -- _. -- - - -----. - ~ ....;. ... ------ --~ -- ~--- - - - - - - -..--.----.-- -- --- _. ---. ~-¡1-"': .... . ' ~ ,I~ . ! ~-~" . i..··;~ ~I- t~, f.' . fl- ~ '" ~. :,:.-.. r !I~>' ~.. ~ - .' -" - , ~ -: - . .' ¡',<Ii. --:., " í .- ~ ~ ,: , "~-' .. =If~{~-: ~. .. - - : >.. "t j ...... > - - .~~ ~I' :. ¡. ~._. J ~.,- t '~-. t . ¡,:"~:. .-'.'::'.:~ I ) ~ --: .~ ! ~ .";'-' · ,..-..:.;. , -.~ . .. ..... .."" ~ . ;I~ -;.: - r - t .. : ,.. ~..--~ ~ ~: · - ~ .... : ~ ..... -. 1- ,-' - '- . 4, ,. ·1. . -:.- · .- , :-:;: ~ ~ .. ~I ...... : - < ~.' .. ;.~. ~ '.., I~.. 1~ ~..~ -:. ...' _ I. '_-.-i, - . .. : ¡. . l't1~- :.: - . ~. '. . ,.'U . I~:': :r-: .- I:. . ~.:".. - .. -. .. J ~_.. .. ¡ D... . : .\. , ~- .t. ' ~.~ -... -:i . . , .~- ~-' ~ 1: ''1 :-t' " :-1 .., J . ., - ~ .~- : 1~ · ~ · . . · 'I it, : . ~ . :. ~ ~ : Lt , ¡ .' , s..rT : ~ ,. -. .. i ~ , ; :. - ~CHW~ ., . ~ ~ \L) ~ .. It ~ i~- - ::- J :J~ ' tI :~1J , ~; ~ . & . . .." ~ -.i ~.: <': - :- I ~ 1'.: t ~:" -.-. ! : ..~ ;~ ~. ~ .~. :. _! -:. ~: -,~ ~! . :' ~; -",!, .' 1 ..:. . ¡,. $ ..~ 1. - - . . .. -~ . - ! ~~ '; § SCAtlt .. ' ...,.,...., oP ~.1JC A-ø NeC...'" aua'D.~r:~ VOL ~~P6, 4'!17 AÐDIWS ~1~ &-n.,... ~""M' ~ -~~þt "'-'-. ~- ~ ....... ~ - ..... ......... - - -.. PLA T OF SURVEY 'RPÃVBS Er-oNI.!ERN:J. Þc'~ ~: ~l~ -~. MIOCIitlO___t -..¡-¡: '0"""', e..~. JIttI ..- ...... ....., '*',. MQ¥I RM .,... Me ....... .AII.....-.,......,........ ,""- ..,..a, 1MIa all .. WI..... IItCIGA.-..........."'.....NONIn M1.1UUIII'''1ßIIU.Y,,*,'MO''''''~b :-~2/~~I·~;·ì.f ~. ... ....... .... .. ....... ~ ',~ ì Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I . ORDINANCE NO. 1370 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-15 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-l to C-I-Specific Use-Sale of Beer for off premise consumption. BEING the Southeasterly portion of Lots 1 and 2 and the Southern portion of Lot 3, Parkers Subdivision in the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-Q, Page 457, of the Deed and Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a "PK" nail set on the West R.O.W. line of Scruggs Drive for the Northeast corner of this tract described herein, said point being South o degrees 34 minutes 35 seconds West along the West R.O.W. line of Scruggs Drive 67.73 feet from the intersection of the South R.O.W. line of Linma Street and the West R.O.W. line of Scruggs Drive; THENCE South 0 degrees 34 minutes 35 seconds West along the West R.O.W. line of Scruggs Drive 67.77 feet to a ~" iron pin found at the intersection of the West R.O.W. line of Scruggs Drive and the Northwest R.O.W. line of Grapevine Highway (State Highway No. 26) for an angle point of said tract described herein; THENCE South 48 degrees 00 minutes West with the Northwest R.O.W. line of Grapevine Highway 190.2 feet to a ~" iron pin set for the most Southeastern corner of this tract described herein; THENCE departing said R.O.W. line North 31 degrees 56 minutes West generally along a concrete retaining wall and fenceline 136.86 feet to a ~" iron pin set for the most Westerly corner of this tract; THENCE North 47 degrees 59 minutes 15 seconds East and generally along a concrete wall 118.02 feet to a ~" iron pin set for the Northwest corner of this tract; THENCE South 89'degrees 57 minutes East generally along a concrete wall 126.74 feet to the point of beginning and containing 0.575 of an acre (25,062.47 sq. ft.) of land. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I Page 2 This property is located at 6877 Grapevine Highway. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF MAY, 1986. C SSION I' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-15 IS HEREBY REZONED C-1-SPECIFIC USE-SALE OF BEER FOR OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION THIS 9th DAY OF JUNE. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Council Meeting Date: 6/9/86 Request of Cambridge Company, Inc, to Rezone Lot 3, Block 1, Northpark Plaza Addit10n trom ~-l to C-2 Ordinance No. 1371 PZ 86-16 Agenda Number: This Zoning Application is presented on the vacant commercial tract located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive north of Watauga Road. The tract is the undeveloped portion of Northpark Plaza Shopping Center. The requested rezoning is from C-1 Commercial to C-2 Commercial. The applicants are proposing to construct a Firestone Tire and Auto Center on the site. The Zoning Ordinance requires that auto repair facilities be located in the C-2 District. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-16 requesting rezoning on Lot 3, Block 1, Northpark Plaza Addition from C-1 to C-2. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available K~ Head Signature I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 v /~, I I ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I ~ I I Page 3 P & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 ( 5. PZ 86-16 ~ ( Chairman Bowen asked if they plan renovate this service station. e said as it stands now, it doe not meet the requirements to se beer. Ms. Gamache said they She showed drawings and otos of the proposed convenie e store and service station. en said it would meet the Mr. oyston stated the beer permit w ld not be issued until they met the ordinance. Mr. Schwinger said he trades at this station and it looks like there is more property in the pictures. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PZ 86-15. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Request of The Cambridge Companies, Inc. to rezone Lot 3, Block 1, Northpark Plaza Addition, Phase 2, from its present classification of C-l (Commercial) to C-2 (Commercial). This property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive, approximately 755 feet north of Watauga-Smithfield Road. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. I Page 4 P & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 ( ( ~ I David Greene, 5198 Rufe Snow Drive, Suite 202, came forward to represent Cambridge Companies. He said they need this zoning change to allow the construction and operation of a Firestone store. I I Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to please come forward. I I George Strock, 6633 Summertime, came forward. He asked about the noise. He asked if they would use power tools. I Mr. Schwinger stated it would not be outside work. I . Mr. Strock said he had dealings with· garages and he was not in favor of having one across the street from his home. I Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. PZ 86-16 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-16. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the mo~ion carried 4-0. I I Chairman Bowen stated that items 6 would be heard together, but voted individually. I 6. PZ 86-17 Request of Frank B. Ho a portion of Trac , John Condra Survey, Abstr 310, from its present classific on of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 · gle Family). This property is ated north of Starnes Road, bounded on the north by Londonderry Addition and on the east by Kingswood Estates. I 7. PZ 86-18 - - I ~ I I ~ Request of Frank B. Holland to rezone a portion of Tract 2, John Condra Survey, Abstract 310, from its present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Family). This property is located on the east side of Douglas Lane, south of Bursey Road. II -. I I I I I I I It I I I I I I -- I I ( KNOWL TON-E NCLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas Ap r i 1 22, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-16 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROr~1 C-1 TO C-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 85 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commisslon and the City Council. Edu U/. ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, Clty Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Dlrector of PuDI;c Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ Sb-16 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I ORDINANCE NO. 1371 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-16 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-1 to C-2. BEING Lot 3, Block 1, Northpark Plaza Addition, Phase 2, an Addition to the City of North Richland Hills as recorded in Volume 388-154, Page 23, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive, approximately 755 feet north of Wataugà-Smithfield Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZON G COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF MAY, 1986. / BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-16 IS HEREBY REZONED C-2 THIS 9th DAY OF JUNE, 1986. ATTEST: MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) a Operating Budget ., Other CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: Subject: Request of Frank B. Holland to Rezone a Portion of Tract 2, J. Condra Survey, Abstract ]1U trom AG to R-2 Ordinance No. 1374 - Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PZ 86-17 6/9/86 This Zoning Application is presented on undeveloped tract of land located north of Starnes Road immediately west of the Kingswood Addition and south of the Londonderry Addition. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. The purpose for the requested rezoning is to allow for the development of the subject tract as a residential subdivision. The Staff noted several items for the Commission's consideration. A. The subject tract is bounded on the east and south by developments which are currently zoned R-2. The Londonderry Addition to the north is zoned R-l. On the west side of the subject tract is a second tract owned by the applicant on which he has submitted a request for R-3 zoning. B. The Thoroughfare Plan identifies three streets which will be a part of this proposed development. 1) Holiday Lane will be extended through the eastern portion of the development as a two lane Collector Street. 2) Douglas Lane will extend along the western boundary of the subject tract as a two lane Collector Street. 3) John Autrey Road is to be extended through the property in an east-west direction as a two lane Collector Street. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-17 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract 2, J. Condra Survey, Abstract 310 from AG to R-2. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Î Y' f¿tt/~ , City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Fmance Director Paae 1 of _~ I I I' 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I ~ I I I I 1 I ~ I I Page 4 p & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 ( ( David Greene, 5198 Rufe Snow Drive, Suite 202, came forward to repres Cambridge Companies. He said t y need this zoning change to the construction and operatio Firestone store. Chairman Bowen cal d for those wishing to spea n opposition to please come f ard. George ock, 6633 Summertime, came forwa He asked about the noise. He sked if they would use power 01s. Mr. Schwinger stated it would not be outside work. Mr. Strock said he had dealings with garages and he was not in favor of having one across the street from his home. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-16. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen stated that items 6 & 7 would be heard together, but voted on individually. 6. PZ 86-17 Request of Frank B. Holland to rezone a portion of Tract 2, John Condra Survey, Abstract 310, from its present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family). This property is located north of Starnes Road, bounded on the north by Londonderry Addition and on the east by Kingswood Estates. 7. PZ 86-18 Request of Frank B. Holland to rezone a portion of Tract 2, John Condra Survey, Abstract 310, from its present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-3 (Single Family). This property is located on the east side of Douglas Lane, south of Bursey Road. I' Page 5 P & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I ~ I I ... ( ( Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these two cases to please Come forward. Doug Gilliland, 4901 Strummer Drive, came forward to represent Mr. Holland. He stated they wish to rezone 33 acres north of Starnes Road, west of Kingswood Estates and south of Londonderry, from Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. Mr. Gilliland said they plan a quality neighborhood which would be compatible with the current use. He stated there would be 194 R-2 lots which they would call Evergreen Estates. Mr. Gilliland said there would be three streets that would be 41 feet curb to curb. He said there are 16~ acres on Starnes Road that are already zoned R-2. He said he felt it would be a quality rated subdivision. Mr. Gilliland said they would have landscaping and an entry on Starnes at HOliday Lane. He said they would have a variety of evergreen trees as well as other blooming shrubs. He said there would be a similar entry on Douglas Lane. Mr. Gilliland said this would be low density single family with 1600 to 2000 square feet homes that would sell from $110,000 to the lower $140,000. He said they would have selected builders and they would offer natural gas and electric. He said the electricity would be underground. Mr. Gilliland said they would provide sidewalks on both sides of the streets. He said he felt this was a quality rated plan which would be compatible with the surrounding areas. He said they were almost totally surrounded, Londonderry has homes from $100,000 to $130,000 for 1600 to 2000 square feet. Mr. Gilliland said the lots in Londonderry were from 10,000 to 13,000 square feet. He said Kingswood Estates also had homes from 1600 to 2000 square feet that cost I' Page 6 p & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I ... ( ( from $100,00 to $130,000. He said to the south was R-2-1600 and west was Foster Village which was R-3-1500 which runs from $90,000 to $100,000. Mr. Gilliland said then there was Maroaks Addition which are duplexes, 7000 square foot lots and 1000 square foot units. Mr. Gilliland said north and west are Western Oaks Addition and Foster Village that are R-3-1500. He said his homes would run from $110,000 to $135,000 and he felt they would enhance the neighborhood. He said they had made a study and most of the homes in North Richland Hills are zoned R-2 which takes a salary of $35,000 to $50,000 to qualify. Mr. Gilliland stated there was a glut in the marketplace for $150,000 homes. He said he felt this zoning is appropriate for this area. Chairman Bowen asked who would maintain the evergreens. Mr. Gilliland said they would for 3 to 5 years. He said they require very little maintenance. Ms. Flippo asked if they plan to have a Homeowners Association. Mr. Gilliland said they felt there was no need for one. Mr. Gilliland requested rebuttal time. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in oPposition to these requests to please come forward. Tom Duer, 7312 Londonderry, came forward. He said he had resided in North Richland Hills for 31 years of his life. He stated he was at the last City Council meeting where they were proposing higher density, R-8 zoning. He said the cOuncil was against it. Dr. Duer stated that speciality builders were not coming to North Richland Hills, only tract home builders. I' Page 7 P & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I ~ I I . ( ( Dr. Duer said they feel they have enough R-3 the same as they feel they have enough Multi-Family. He said when it is developed, they will have enough. Dr. Duer said across Bursey Road in Keller they have the zoning "RLD" classification which is 3/4 acre lots and 2000 square foot minimum houses. He said North Richland Hills should have as good as Keller on the south side of Bursey Road. Dr. Duer said he hoped the City of North Richland Hills would have as good a quality of homes as in Hurst. He said when they are talking about North Richland Hills, they say it is just west of Hurst. He said North Richland Hills has very little R-I zoning and he feels this should be R-I. He said he would like to see some quality houses in the area and the quality of living we deserve. David Wilson, 5700 Firewood Drive, Arlington, Texas, came forward to speak in favor of the requests. He said he is the owner of the property. He said he did not ask for Londonderry or Kingswood Estates to be built next to his property. He said they cut off their view as a farmer. He said he thinks this development would be good. Jack Frisque, 8025 Valley Drive, came forward to speak in oPposition to these requests. He said he was concerned about the quality of life in our city. He showed a color coded map of North Richland Hills. He said there is very little R-I zoning in the city. Mr. Frisque stated he was President of the Green Valley Homeowners Association and they met with Mr. Gilliland Tuesday night. He said he appreciated them meeting with the homeowners. He said the homeowners want R-I zoning for this area. He said R-3 zoning is spreading like cancer. He said R-3 has on street parking and front entry garages. Mr. Frisque said he went I' Page 8 ( P & Z }Iinutes Ie May 8, 1986 I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I ~ I I ( with Mr. Gilliland to see Quail Valley in Keller and it was nice, but you ask if this will be like Quail Valley, they say yes, but in concept; yes, but more. He said they say it will be 1600 to 2000 square feet homes, but it will be at the builder's option. Mr. Frisque said they say there is no demand for larger homes; how do we know, we have the businesses in North Richland Hills, why can't we have nice homes also. Mr. Frisque said the homeowners in North Richland Hills care, they care where they plan to raise their family, and they want something the city will be proud of and this is our chance. Mr. Frisque said the City Council does not want any more R-3. Debbie Duer, 7312 Londonderry, came forward. She stated she feels they need a Planned Development for this area to require rear or side entry garages. She said Londonderry was 100% rear entry and Kingswood Estates was almost all rear and side entry garages. Ms. Duer said it was for safety. She said cars would not be on the street and it would help Crime Watch when a strange car would be on the street. She said it constitutes a neat neighborhood. Ms. Duer said front garages have cars and boats on the drive because they use the garages for storage. Ms. Duer said this property has 60% oak trees and has rolling hills. She asked why couldn't we have an addition like Woodridge Addition off Grapevine Highway which has 1800 square foot homes on smaller lots and the price runs $150,000. Gary Profitt, 7808 Douglas Lane, came forward. He said he has 3 acres. He asked why they have to have partly R-2 and partly R-3; why can't they have all R-2. Mr. Profitt said he guessed he would have to be picking up trash for the next 3 to 5 years while they build this subdivision. He asked why I Page 9 P & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I ( ( are they not required to take care of their own mess. Mr. Profitt said he would accept it if it would be all R-2 zoning. Chairman Bowen said he agreed with Mr. Profitt, but the city has an ordinance which requires builders to clean up their mess. Mr. Royston said the city does require the builder at the end of a job they must clean up before they can get a final on the house. Rick Graves, 7305 Londonderry, came forward. He said he had lived here for l~ years. He said he previously lived in Garland for 6 years and was Vice President of the Homeowners Association there and went to City Council and Planning and Zoning meetings. Mr. Graves said the addition he lived in was from 1650 square feet to 1900 square feet. He said he is proud to live on Londonderry. He said he drives to Dallas to work, but lives here by choice. He said he sees pride in Londonderry Addition. Mr. Graves said there is great potential here so don't sell us short; we don't want to be second best. He said he did not like front entry garages either. Glenn Derwin, 7724 Aubrey Lane, came forward. He said he lives one house from this development. He said he is opposed to the R-3 zoning because in R-3 areas there is a lot of trash and junk cars. , Don Cowdrey, 7804 Red Oak, came forward. He said he moved here from Watauga where he lived for 10 years. He said he lived in an R-3 zoning and did not think it would go down, but it did. He said he lives in R-2 zoning, but has a 2400 square foot house. He asked why couldn't we have R-2 with a PD like Keller does. I Page 10 P & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I ( ( Dan Bush, 7308 Londonderry Drive, came forward. He said he moved here two years ago from Oklahoma. He said he did not find an area he liked until he found Londonderry. Mr. Bush said most people have a high regard for the HEB area, but he feels that way about North Richland Hills. He said we need the upper class, not just the affordable houses. Wilbur F. Wells, 7300 Bursey Road, came forward. He said his property was north of this development. He said he has 5~ acres, 1018 feet deep and 214 feet wide which joins the R-3 type request. Mr. Wells stated he endorses the R-1 zoning. Mr. Wells said he has a problem. He said if Douglas Lane is extended north of this property, it would go right through his property. He said the Thoroughfare Plan shows a two lane, 60 foot right-of-way through to Bursey Road. Mr. Wells said he had lived there 15 years. He said he did not want the water tower across the street and he did not want the Senior Citizens home. He said Bursey Road is going to be widened and he will be charged for curb and gutter. Mr. Wells said his property is zoned Agriculture and he requests that Douglas Lane be a cuI de sac and not allow it to dead end into his property. He said if it were to extend, it would ruin his property. He said Keller does not have a through street there. Chairman Bowen said he could not see Douglas Lane being a cuI de sac. He said he feels it needs to go through to Bursey Road. Mr. Wells said people would be going south to get out of the area unless you want to assist the City of Keller. I Page 11 ( P & Z Minutes Ie May 8, 1986 I I I I I I I - I I I I I I ~ ~ I I ..... ( Marvin Smith, 7609 Douglas Lane, came forward. He said he had lived in North Richland Hills all his life. He showed the Commission aerials of the area. Mr. Smith stated he was not opposed to development, but he does not like the R-3 zoning. He said in Windcrest Addition, Mr. Hamilton is building 15 or 18 houses in excess of 2000 square feet. He said he feels we do not need more R-3 in North Richland Hills. He said there would be cars parked in the street, junk and lawns grown up. Mr. Smith stated he felt it would be good to have R-2 zoning with 1700 to 1800 square foot houses. He stated he has a 4300 square foot house and when he sells it, he plans to build an 8000 square foot house and he does not want R-3 around him. He said if they build this, they would have legal opposition from him. He said Maroaks Addition was originally zoned for 1600 square foot houses, but Burk Collins came in and zoned it for duplexes. Mr. Smith said he was buying foreclosures in that subdivision. John Whitehouse, 7308 Bursey Road, came forward. He said he would prefer 1800 square foot houses or larger. He asked what percent of brick they would be. Chairman Bowen stated the city has an ordinance which requires all houses to be 75% brick. Mr. Whitehouse said he felt it needs to be a Planned Development because it means nothing when property changes hands. Mr. Whitehouse said he did not feel that Douglas Lane needed to be changed. He said there is already a through street. I Page 12 P & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I PZ 86-17 APPROVED I I I ~ I I PZ 86-18 DENIED . ( ( Mr. Gilliland came back for rebuttal. He said they feel responsible to the citizens and would like to upgrade the area. He said that Mr. Frisque told him he had no problem with the R-2 lot and the same deed restriction of 1800 square feet houses as Londonderry. Mr. Gilliland said most of the land is R-2-1600. He said Londonderry is not really R-l. He said the lots are 10,000 and the deed restrictions show 1600 square foot houses. Mr. Gilliland showed the Commission a copy of the deed restrictions for Londonderry. He said he was not excited about Foster Village, but would like to be allowed to develop an area like Kingswood and Londonderry. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Bowen said he wanted to make it clear that he was at the City Council meeting and R-3 was not an issue. He said R-8 was and it was denied. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-17. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen said he felt that 1400 square foot houses were too small and asked Mr. Gilliland if they would amend the zoning of PZ 86-18 to 1600 square feet. Mr. Gilliland said they could go to 1500. Ms. Flippo made the motion to deny PZ 86-18. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion to deny carried 4-0. Chairman Bowen stated they have a right to appeal to the City Council for a hearing. Mr. Gilliland said they would. I Ie I I I I I I I II I I I I I I l- I I . , ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, J NC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas April 22, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-17 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 41 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. R~'JA/ ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, Clty Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of PUDlic Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 86-17 1 Page 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I" . .T ~ I I I I I I I P I I I I I I \ I I ORDINANCE NO. 1374 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-17 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. BEING a part of that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the John Condra Survey, Abstract 310, Tarrant County, Texas and being a part of that same tract conveyed to David Shaw Wilson, Betty Brewer and Virginia Demarest, as described in the deed recorded in Volume 7299, Page 1094 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a steel rod at the southeast corner of said John Condra Survey, said point being on the west boundary lane of Block 19 of Kingswood Estates, Section 3, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-170, Page 21 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 89 degrees 42 minutes 50 seconds West along the south boundary line of said John Condra Survey, 676.21 feet to a steel rod; THENCE North along the east boundary line of that same 'tract conveyed to Don J. Norris, Sr. etux Sue, as described in the deed recorded in Volume 4483, Page 612 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, 333.20 feet to a pipe; THENCE North 89 degrees 56 minutes 29 seconds West along the north boundary line of said tract conveyed to Don J. Norris, Sr. etux Sue, 657.44 feet to a steel rod; THENCE North 01 degrees 01 minutes 25 seconds East 340.00 feet; THENCE North 33 degrees 43 minutes 53 seconds West 585.36 feet; THENCE North 00 degrees 00 minutes 46 seconds West 170.00 feet to a point on the north boundary line of said tract conveyed to David Shaw Wilson, Betty Brewer and Virginia Demarest; THENCE North 89 degrees 59 minutes 14 seconds East along the north boundary , line of said tract conveyed to David Shaw Wilson, Betty Brewer, and Virginia Demarest, 1668.91 feet to a steel rod on the west boundary of Block 20 of said Kingswood Estates, Section 3; I' Ie I I I I I I I " I I I I I I l- I I . .. Page 2 THENCE South 00 degrees 41 minutes 53 seconds West along said west boundary line of Block 20 and continuing along the west boundary line of said Block 19, 1334.49 feet to a steel rod and the point of beginning and containing 38.9568 acres more or less. This property is located north of Starnes Road, bounded on the north by Londonderry Addition and on the east by Kingswood Estates. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF MAY, 1986. ~æ ' CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION , ~ OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-17 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 9th DAY OF JUNE, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY ~ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development - Council Meeting Date: 6/9/86 Request of James Walker to Rezone Tract 4R, A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract IbjU from K-7 kt to C-2 Ordinance No. 1372 PZ 86-19 Agenda Number: This Zoning application is presented on a vacant multi-family tract located on the east side of Flory Street between Harmonson Road and Glenview Drive. The requested rezoning is from R-7 MF Multi-Family to C-2 Commercial. The applicants stated intent is to construct a commercial building on the site which would contain a contractors storage and assembly facility. The Staff noted to the Commission that the area of the subject tract on Flory Street is a mixed use area. The two lots north and south of the subject tract on Flory Street are currently zoned C-2 and in use as commercial businesses. The property on the west side of Flory Street facing the subject tract is zoned R-7 MF. The multi-family site is vacant. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-19 requesting rezoning on Tract 4R, A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630 from R-7 MF to C-2. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ~uL~ City Manager , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM PaQe 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas April 22, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAfJD HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-19 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROf1 R-7-r~F TO C-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 148 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ßda4-~ ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures c c : r~ r. Rod 9 erN. L i n e , C 1 t Y f·1 a nag e r Mr. Gene Riddle, Dlrector of PuDlic Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development "' Zoning Review PZ 86-19 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 · ,,," I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I . Page 13 P & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 8. PZ 86-19 PZ 86-19 APPROVED ( ( Request of James Walker to rezone Tract 4R, A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630, from its present classification of R-7-MF (Multi-Family) to C-2 (Commercial). This property is located on the east side of Flory Street, approximately 662 feet south of Glenview Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Delbert Stembridge, 4028 Daley Avenue, came forward to represent Mr. Walker. He said Mr. Walker had purchased the lot adjacent to this property and he plans to put a metal building on it. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Gene Stimmel, 3220 Meadow, Bedford, came forward. He said he owns a lot next to this property and he needs some clarification of the metal buildings and storage. Mr. Royston read from the Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding what could be put in C-2 Commercial zoning. He said he could not say about the metal bUildings, but they would have to meet the building code. Mr. Stimmel said he would like to state he was not speaking in opposition. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. ~ Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PZ 86-19. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. I '. Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1372 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-19 the following described property shall ~ be rezoned from R-7-MF to C-2. BEING part of the A.G. Walker Survey, Abstract 1630 situated about 7~ miles northeast from the courthouse in Tarrant County, Texas; and embracing a portion of the tract described in the deed to Martha Betty Rose recorded in Volume 7434, Page 1001 of the Tarrant County Records. BEGINNING at a 3/4" iron rod for the northeast coarner of said Rose tract and the southeast corner of the 0-8/10 of an acre tract described in the deed to Anita L. Snow and Jerry Dean Anglin recorded in Volume 8335, Page 1771 of the said Deed Records and said 3/4" iron being by deed call 834-5/10 feet east and 740-7/10 feet south of the northwest corner of said A.G. Walker Survey. THENCE South 0 degrees 05 minutes 44 seconds East along the east line of said Rose tract 100-03/100 feet to a 3/4" iron rod for the southeast corner of said Rose tract and the northeast corner of Lot 2 in Block 1 of the Henry Addition recorded in Volume 388-133, Page 42 of the said Deed Records. THENCE South 89 degrees 59 minutes 44 seconds West along the south line of said Rose tract and north line of said Lot 2, a distance of 348-95/100 feet to a 5/8" iron rod for the southeast corner of the tract described in the deed to the City of North Richland Hills recorded in Volume 8098, Page 933 of the said Deed Records for the east line of Flory Street. THENCE North along the east line of said City of North Richland Hills tract for the east line of Flory Street, 100-03/100 feet to a 5/8" iron rod for the northeast corner of said City of North Richland Hills tract in the north line of said Rose tract. THENCE North 89 degrees 59 minutes 44 seconds east along the said north line of Rose tract and the south line of said 0-8/10 of an acre tract 348-78/100 feet~o the place of beginning and containint 34,897 square feet. I ~I. Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I - Page 2 This property is located on the east side of Flory Street, approximately 662 feet south of Glenview Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF MAY, 1986. I' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-19 IS HEREBY REZONED C-2 THIS 9th DAY OF JUNE, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY - I . '. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Planning and Development 6/9/86 _Department: Council Meeting Date: SUbject: Request of David Barfield to Rezone a Portion A N PZ 86-20 of Lot 3R-l, Block 1, Martin Add1tl.on trom Al:i to K-2 genda umber: Ordinance No. 1373 This Zoning Application is presented on a portion of an existing residential tract located on the north side of Nob Hill Drive. The existing tract is currently zoned AG Agriculture although there is a residence on the tract. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. The purpose for the requested change is to allow the subject tract to be subdivided to create a separate lot for development. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-20 requesting rezoning on a portion of Lot 3R-1, Block 1, Martin Addition from AG to R-2. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available f< I/{/~ I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Fmance Director PaQe 1 of 1 R-2. R-3 1090 I I I I / / , I I I ' \ ' \, 1- , \\ " SU \ " " \ \ \ -¡-F. F? , . . , I , , ~ , AG R-3 ... j I Ie I I I I I I I -- ( Pag~ 14 P & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 9. PZ 86-20 PZ 86-20 APPROVED I I I I I I Ie I L.. .A.>..J~.. . .'. ~. . _ . --.-,.. ---.... .-.1. . __. .. 10. PZ 86-22 ~ - ..-~ .-.........., ..... . ( Request of David Barfield to rezone a portion of Lot 3R-1, Block 1, Martin Addition, from its present classification of AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family). This property is located on the north side of Nob Hill Drive, west of Precinct Line Road. - - Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Delbert Stembridge came forward to represent Mr. Barfield. He said this lot would become a part of Nob Hill Addition. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-20. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0. . Request of The Chasewood Company to rezone Lot 1, Block Snow Heights North. ~.dd:i.t:tOt .:~I:>·m its present classificatio R-7-MF-PD (Multi-Family-PI ed Development) to R-7-MF-PD ( i-Family-Planned Develo t)(Change of fence r iction). This property is ocated on the north side of Northeast Loop 820 (Quinten's Crossing Apartments). Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. ~ I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I '" ~ . KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas April 22, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-20 REVIEW LETTER, ZONiNG FROM AG TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 72 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. tt/, ~ ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, Clty Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Olrector of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development :t . Zoning Review PZ 86-20 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I ORDINANCE NO. 1373 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-20 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. THE DESCRIPTION of a 0.1620-acre tract of land and being a portion of Lot 3Rl, Block 1, Martin Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume 388-193, Page 13, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin in the north right-of-way line of Nob Hill Drive; THENCE North 89 degrees 01 minutes 40 seconds East along the north line of Nob Hill Drive for a distance of 60.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 07 minutes 05 seconds West a distance of 120.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 01 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 58.22 feet to a point in the west property line of said Lot 3R1, Block 1, Martin Addition, and the east property line of a tract of land conveyed to Joe E. Gray by deed recorded in Volume 6733, Page 327, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas;· THENCE South 00 degrees 07 minutes 05 seconds East along the common line of said Lot 3R1, Block 1, Martin Addition, and said Gray tract for a distance of 70.72 feet to an iron pin for angle point of the herein described tract and being at an inside west corner of said Lot 3R1, Block 1; THENCE South 01 degrees 56 minutes 43 seconds West a distance of 49.34 feet to the point of beginning and containing 0.1620 acre of land. ~ I · · Ie I I I I I I I it I I I I I I '- I I Page 2 This property is located on the north side of Nob Hill Drive, west of Precinct Line Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 8th DAY OF MAY, 1986. c ¡Þ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-20 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 9th DAY OF JUNE, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY -- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: .Ubject: Administration Council Meeting Date: 6-9-86 Request for an Appeal Hearing on PZ 86-18 Agenda Number: PZ 86-18 If Council grants the request for an appeal hearing, the hearing can be heard July 14, 1986. Recommendation: Set date for hearing. N/A Finance Review Acct. Number N/ A Sufficient Funds Available ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director 1 Page 1 of I" Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I HOLLAND WEST, INC. May 12, 1986 City of North Richland Hills Texas P.O. Box 18609 7301 N.E. Loop 820 N. Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: Richard Royston RE: P.Z. 86-18 Rezone Portion of Tract 2 John Condra Survey Abstract from Agriculture to R- 3 Dear Richard, We are hereby appealing the ruling of the Planning and Zoning Conmission on P.Z. 86-18. We respectfully request that this case be heard by the City Council. If you have any questions or we can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Yours Truly, xc: Frartl{ Holland 680 Grapevine Highway, Hurst, Texas 76054 (817) 656-0177 Planners - Engineers - Surveyors - Construction Managers Denver - Phoenix - Ft. Worth ... CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: -SUbject: Administration Request for an Appeal Hearing on PZ 86-22 Council Meeting Date: 6-9-86 Agenda Number: PZ 86-22 If Council grants the request for an appeal hearing, the hearing can be heard July 14, 1986. Recommendation: Set date for hearing. N/A Finance Review Acct. Number N/ A Sufficient Funds Available Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other .,. 1 e 1/1 /~ Department Head Signature I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Fmance Director Page 1 of 1 I· Ie I I I I I I I . I I c THE CHASEWOOD COMPANY A Trammell Crow Residential Company May 15, 1986 City Manager City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: Appeal Fence Variance Quinten's Crossing Apartments Gentlemen: Please accept this letter as our notification that we wish to a~eal the decision of the Planning and Zoning Department at the meeting of May 8, 1986. Said appeal is based upon our intention that we erect a wooden fence in lieu of a masonry fence. Our contention being that a wooden fence would be adequate for the screening of the side of the project in question, and it would serve the same purposes. Please advise as to the time and date of the City Council meeting at which this appeal will be heard. Should you have any questions, please no dot hesitate to call. I Sincerely, ~ I ~O~lS"<Yx c.X~ ~ Vice President to I TM/vlc I I f I Dallasi Fort \.~/orth O;ViSKH1 251 O'Connor Rlcige SUire 200 ¡¡,,'ing. fexas 750.38 2 Î 4-5 ìO-570ì , A. ' ", \ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 6/9/86 äepartment: _ Council Meeting Date: ~ubject: Consideration of Proposed Amendment to Section Agenda Number: PZ 86-21 XX of the Zoning Ordinance (UI080) Ordinance No. 1375 The Planning and Zoning Commission considered a proposed reV1S10n to Section XX of the Zoning Ordinance (#1080). The proposed revision would delete the requirement for requests for Specific Use Permits for sale of liquor in North Richland Hills to submit to the Zoning Hearing process. These permits would be handled by the Staff as an administrative function of the Building Officials Office under this proposal. In reviewing the proposed revision the Commission expressed the concern that the necessary controls regarding the required spacing from churches and schools was not adequately covered in the revised Ordinance. The Staff responded by noting that in Section 20.4.3 (as revised) the statement is made that the Chief Building Official may not issue Specific Use Permit until he has ascertained that all distance requirements of the State Statutes are in compliance. It is incumbent upon the applicant to provide the Building Official with whatever documentation is necessary to insure that compliance. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the proposed revision to Section XX of the Zoning Ordinance regarding the Specific Use Permit for the sale of e.lcOhol. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _Operating Budget _ -¿;:z ~ æ 1 ~# ~~ -Pi L~ - - Departme Head Signature ' City Man~ger CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Paae 1 of 1 I I. I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I Page 2 P & Z Minutes April 24, 1986 ( ( 4. PS 86-16 Request of J.V. Fr B.J. Fenimore for Replat ots 19R-l, 19R-2, 19 -, 19R-4, Block 33, Holiday West ddition. 5. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PS 86-16. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0. PZ 86-21 Consideration of proposed revision to Zoning Ordinance #1080, Section XX. Chairman Bowen stated the proposed change was regarding taking the requirement for Specific Use for the sale of Beer and Alcoholic Beverage out of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Wood made a motion to table PZ 86-21 and refer it back to the City Staff for clarification of the requirements for an application for Beer and Alcoholic Beverages and to require the applicant to provide a survey showing the distance of the property from churches and schools as required by State Law. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 4-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:36 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission .,- I -- I I...o..:..:.,;¡¡¡,;,;.. _~. ___.... _. .. ....... _, . ,\ -, t I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I Page 16 p & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 ( ( Mr. Michaels stated he felt the wo fence would provide adequate ity. Mr. Hallford stated they agr ed that if they would be allowed build the apartments, they would lId the masonry fence. Mr. Michaels read rom the minutes of the City Counci meeting. He said he f the masonry fence stipulation He said he received a e Ordinance and someone had _," the stipulation about the just above the signatures. ...>/"- , '¡,' · Royston stated that is where the stipulations are put. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Bowen stated that as far as he was concerned, he felt it should stay a part of the ordinance. He said he.felt it was needed to separate the school from the apartments. PZ 86-22 DENIED Mr. Hallford made the motion to deny PZ 86-22. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 4-0. 11. PZ 86-21 Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance #1080, Section XX. :..,....... Chairman Bowen stated this was tabled from the last meeting. He said it was regarding the sale of Alcoholic Beverages not having to have a Specific Use. Chairman Bowen stated that Mr. Royston has assured the Commission that they have the ability to control it. '~-"aÞ ... _. I" Ie I I I I I I I -- Page 17 p & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 ( ( PZ 86-21 APPROVED Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-21. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:35 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I I 'I I I I -- I I '. I' ~,-þ" '- I 1 1 I I I I II I I I I I I I -- I ORDINANCE NO. 1375 BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; that 1. ORDINANCE NO. 1080 of the City of North Richland Hill is hereby amended as follows: a. Subsection 20.2 of Section XX shall hereafter read as follows: "20.2. EFFECTS OF SPECIFIC USE (SU) CLASSIFICATION Property only in combination with LR, 0-1, C-l, C-2, OC, 1-1 and 1-2 Districts may be classified Specific Use. All-- / requests for Specific Use must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council except those issued under 20.3.1 which may be issued by the Chief Building Official of the City pursuant to procedure set forth in 20.4.2 and 20.4.3 below. Specific Use Permits will be issued only to a responsible person; not to the property." b. Subsection 20.4.2 and 20.4.3 are hereby amended to read as follows: "20.4.2. REQUIREMENT FOR SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. A Specific Use Permit for the Sale of Alcoholic Beverages may be issued by the Chief Building Official of the City only when such use is to be in conjunction with the sale of prepared food for on premise consumption. The said Official will not issue such specific use until he has made an inspection and made a positive finding that all distance requirements imposed by the Statutes of this State are in compliance and that the property is located in the proper zoning classification for specific use pursuant to 20.2 above. The permit must be countersigned by the City Secretary." "20.4.3. REQUIREMENTS FOR SALE OF BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION ONLY. '. The Chief Building Official may issue such permit when he has made an inspection and has made an affirmative finding that all distance requirements imposed by the Statutes of this State are in compliance and that the property is located in the proper zoning classification for Specific Use pursuant to 20.2 above. The permit must be countersigned by the City Secretary." I' -. I I I I I I 1 . I I I 1 I I I I- I r 1- ORDINANCE NO. Page 2 2. IT APPEARING to the Council that this Ordinance has been approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. It is further Ordained that this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its date of passage. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission this 8th day of Ma , 1986. ~~ø~_ Secret y ~__ PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Richland Hill, Texas this day of Chai Council of the City of North , 1986. APPROVED: Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I· ~ I 1 1 I I 1 1 - I 1 I I I I I f I ... Attached is a revision of Ordinance No. 1375 as proposed by Mayor Echols. If these changes are to be considered the proposed revised ordinance must be submitted to Planning and Zoning for action. The additional proposed wording by Mayor Echols is underlined. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1375 Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; that 1. Ordinance No. 1080 of the City of North Richland Hills is hereby amended as follows: a. Subsection 20.2 of Section XX shall hereafter read as follows: "20-2. EFFECTS OF SPECIFIC USE (SU) CLASSIFICATION Property only in combination with 0-1, C-l, C-2, OC, I-I and I-2 districts may be classified specific use. All requests for specific use must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council except those issued under 20.3.1 which may be issued by the Chief Building Official of the City pursuant to procedure set forth in 20.4.2 and 20.4.3 below. Specific Use Permits will be issued only to the person or entity holding the State License; not to the property." b. Subsection 20.4.2 and 20.4.3 are hereby amended to read as follows: "20. 4. 2 · REQUIREMENT FOR SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. A Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages may be issued by the Chief Building Official of the City only to a responsible person or entit~ when such use is in conjuncti~ with the sale of prepared food for on premise consumption. The said Official will not issue such specific use permit until he has made an inspection and made a positive finding that all distance requirements imposed by the Statutes of this State are in compliance and that the property is located in the proper zoning classification for specific use pursuant to 20.2 above. The permit must be countersigned by the City Secretary. The ap licant shall furnish a co of his or its State License-to the Cit Secretar, for co in, within thirt da s of issuance of the S ecial Use Permit. The Cit Secretar shall ascertain, annually that the current permit holder is the same ~erson or entity that is licensed by the State." "20.4.3. REQUIREMENTS FOR SALE OF BEER FOR OFF-PREMISE CONSUMPTION ONLY. The Chief Building Official may issue such permit only to a erson or entit in an existin business enga ed in retail sales of food ~roducts when he has made an inspection and has ¡ " I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .... Ordinance No. 1375 Page 2 made an affirmative finding that all distance requirements imposed by the Statutes of this State are in compliance and that the property is located in the proper zoning classification for Specific Use pursuant to 20.2 above. The permit must be countersigned by the City Secretary. The a licant shall furnish a co of his or its State Liëëñse to the Cit Secretar, for co in, within thirt da s of issuance of the S ecial Use Permit. The Cit Secretar shall ascertain, annuall , that the current ermit holder is the same erson or entity that is licensed by the State." 2. It appearing to the Council that this Ordinance has been approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, it is further ordained that this Ordinance, shall be in full force and effect from and after its date of passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this ____ day of , 1986. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 6/9/86 Department: Council Meeting Date: Request of Kenneth C. Whitely, Trustee for Replat PS 86-17 of Lots 24R and 25 through lY, Block 1, uak ttills Add1t1.%EAnda Number: This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lots 24R and 25 through 29, Block 1, Oak Hills Addition. The property is located on the northwest corner of Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road. The tract is currently zoned 0-1 Office District. The purpose for the proposed replat is to subdivide the subject tract into individual lots for development of an office complex. All of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered with the exception of a very minor lapse in the overall fire hydrant coverage which the applicant's Engineer notes in his response letter as being in a non-building area. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Plat Application PS 86-17 requesting Replat of Lots 24R and 25 through 29, Block 1, Oak Hills Addition as submitted. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡¿11/~ City Manager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 R-3 1090 I-I í/ , " t · \ \, \ , I-I \, '" SU , , ,', \ \ J? , , , 1 I \ I · , " , I I I , I AG R-3 I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, MAY 22, 1986:- 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF APRIL 24, 1986 CONSIDERATI OF THE MINUTES OF MAY 8 1986 1. PS 86-17 The meeting was called to order by Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P. M. PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Members PS 86-17 APPROVED 2. PS 86-22 Alt. Member Dir. of anning/Dev. P & Z ordinator Do hn Schwinger Mark Wood Marjorie Nash Joe Hallford George Tucker Richard Royston Wanda Calvert Carole Flippo Mr. Wood made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Schwinger and Mr. Hallford abstaining since they were not present at the meeting. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Wood and Ms. Nash abstaining since they were not present at the meeting. Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee for replat of Lots 24R and 25 thru 29, Block 1, Oak Hills Addition. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 86-17. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Jack E. King for Lot 9-R, Block 4, Diamond Addition. n Bowen stated that since this a replat in residential zoning there would be a Public Hearing. He opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please Come forward. I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I Owe'D. Long and Associate( Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS May 12, 1986 Mrs. Wanda Calvert Planning and Zoning Coordinator City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Oak Hills Addition Lot 24R, 25 through 29, Block 1 Replat PS-86-17 Dear Mrs. Calvert: We have received q copy of the City Engineer's (Richard W. Albin, P.E.) letters dated April 17 and 29, 1986 pertaining to the captioned replat and have the following comments: Item 1. (Both Letters) - The City normally advises the utility companies of the replats but we will be happy to do so if requested.. Item 2. (Letter dated April 17, 1986) - Construction plans were submitted with the plat. Item 2. (Letter dated April 29, 1986) - All areas of the lots are covered by existing fire hydrant coverage based on 300 foot radius, except for a very small area at the northeast corner which falls in an area where no buildings can be constructed. Item 3. (Both Letters) - The total right-of-way widths for Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road have now been shown on the plat. Construction of one-half of Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road is now under construction and is almost complete at this time. Item 4. (Letter dated April 29th) - The Ingress Egress and Drainage Easement was set aside across lots 24R and 25, Block 1 for the benefit of development of the office zoned lots 24R, 25 & 26, Block 1, in order that a drainage swell could be constructed if needed along with the parking lot development of each lot to avoid any discharge of storm water on to the residential lots to the west. Item 4. (Letter dated April 17th) and Item 5. (Letter dated April 29th) - The developer/owner has been made aware that he is responsible for all ordinances and pOlicy requirements of the City. If you have any additional questions or requirements, please give me a call. ~~, f?- ¡¿ I-E ~'WrJnM: W!f!l.tØ I Consulting Engineer~ ODL/ml cc: KenD~th C. Wh·- t lø\J 1615 PreclnéfL1rrG RolIe/ .Ir~ditG~06 / Hurst. Texas 76053 / Phone (817) 281-8121 cc: John Barfield I., I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( K NOWL TON-E NG II SH-F LOWE RS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas April 29, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hi Ils 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-958, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS OAK HILLS ADDITION LOT 24R, 25 THRU 292 BLK. 1, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, PS 86 - 17, GRID MAP 63 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with stanaard City procedures. 2 We would note that adequate fire hydrant coverage protection has not been provided for these lots based on the 300 foot radius requirement for office zoning. 3 The total right-of-way widths of Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road should be shown on the platting. The developer should be required to escrow his prorata share of future street improvements on Amundson and Precinct Line Roads. 4 A drainage swale is proposed along the west side of this proposed subdivision across lots 24-R and 25 as required to protect the adjacent subdivision lots west of this platting from flooding. The swale is to be constructed in an "Ingress, Egress and Drainage Easement". As required by subdivision ordinance the swale should be concrete lined and fences should not be constructed across the swale which would obstruct flow. A detail of the swale section should be provided in the plans including a detail of the discharge opening into Amundson Road. 5 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development COdes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the CitY-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I Subdivision Review L(ter continued Please call if you have any questions. V/~ P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, Clty Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development April 29, 1986 PS 86 - 17 ( OAK HILLS ADDITION PAGE 2 I . ,_ I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I I" I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas Ap r ill 7, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-958, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS OAK HILLS ADDITION LOT 24R, 25 THRU 291 BLK. 1, REPLAT, PS 86 - 17, GRID MAP 63 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed rep1at in accordance with standard City procedures. 2 This review is based on rep1at only since water, sewer, paving and drainage plans have not been submitted to our office for review. Comments in this review will be limited to platting only. 3 The total right-of-way widths of Amundson Road and Precinct Line Road should be shown on the platting. The developer should be required to escrow his prorata share of future street improvements on Amundson and Precinct Line Roads. 4 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~!J-W RICHARD \~. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger'N. Line, City Manager 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I I" I Subdivision Review L~ter continued ( Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works r·1r. Ri chard Royston, Di rector of Deve 1 opment Ap r i 1 17, 1986 PS 86 - 17 OAK HILLS ADDITION PAGE 2 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I {' I ( ( March 24, 1986 Mr. R. S. Williams TESCO Region Engr. Supervisor P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth, TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number: PS 86-17 Oak Hills Addition, Block 1, Lots 24R, 25, 26, 27, 28, & 29 Address or Location: Northwest corner of Precinct Line Road and Amundson Road Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert. Planning and Zoning Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than 4/2/86. Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. ~~- Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made. (See Comments) COMMENTS: - ç r'ì!'\!" ; ~ ,v-, . -. I - r' ~ '".. ~ ---R''''. -~---. '-oJ'_1 1 ,-; L.i~:¡·":' ·1; ; ;"1:\ ~- ~_L:..'_ f IV 0: ST R ¡ U 0 -, i u......· ,\1 (~.< r: L 1",- ¡ :: ':". ..,.... (' t I" \, ~.I . .., '¡VI fL \ ". ~u. . ON TUE jrrr.~CHEû Sl\ETC~iI·.hJ v ¡ ,n TESCO: DATE: .$- 3/- ,F?' SIGNATURE~~¥~~~ SIGNATURE ~~ G~ CITY: DATE: 3/24/86 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Planning and Development Department: .Ubject: Request of Jack Roseberry for Replat of Lots 2R-2A and 2R-2B, Block 13, Meadowview Estates Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PS 86-20 6/9/86 This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lots 2R-2A and 2R-2B, Block 13, Meadowview Estates. The property is located on the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Rumfield Road. The purpose for the proposed plat is to subdivide the property into two lots for development. Lot 2R-2B has been purchased by the Southland Corporation for a Seven-Eleven Convenience Store site. All of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Plat Application PS 86-20 requesting replat of Lots 2R-2A, and 2R-2B, Block 13, Meadowview Estates as submitted. ~ Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget _ /j~~~ ~~~ l:t1/~ ~ ~ ip~=-~~ature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Paae 1 of 1 L; /1 f~ ~~~-= T R-~!! .\~ ,. I ~~.~~ ~ IR-3 " , ~~P-- 1225 ~ ~I·~~~ I /1224:' . I / / I ~ I I .. I: I ~ Ie n II II I JI Þl ~ I I ft . ì '. ì r~j/~ . 'I ~' I j i : I ¡ ~~~~ ~·i':1I· ~ . Un~~ G ,I I . , . . I :':~ I ~..;..JT;:-f,.. ~~_ :i- ¡ . ; ,I.... -r--l~ - C , , , : ~ ~ ~-.....-- i - . I . --- su ~J-.+--= _ -- -1- I loll / C-I 1200 , . R-2 1222 AG r ¡.oJ ¡.: ~ C-2 R-7-MF 1189 ....... c-r 12'9 ~ AG R-3 ............... C-I I 1193 I . C-211 ." I ~ .~"..I S u* ! . f.6~ f.!ò ~ ,R' . I\IIkU;.JlIT C~~ ,.~' W ~I n t~ ....-- . C, f'" ,,\01 r f . (.. I-- ~ R- 2 I~. '''. I. ..uw . ....::;~ ~. ~ 1175 _. 1 J T . ... I q- *-l?1~~~~-- ~AI,ol.-r'-,!f OA '~ I c'~f'Tt' J ¡ [ tr9:-1~9A~<~~ Ë .... .1 · . -;- - , ; i r,~ ,--,:í'--i. ,~IIIp;"""-! L G 1..1- /0 8.~ .AG I~: ,~ '''MM''Ton" .. Co T . '~ >'--1 _ I r"ll~ - ~~~ PI"· ¡]. f-lTTg~~ki~~=ë I I '305 ~; JJJ~~~ 1 ....... ~.~ .' , L-?¢~' ~ ~ r T T\-.-r~ C 't' ~/ " ¡,.:;,.,.,... .,..-_µ a... U~III: --,' ~ ,. I , , I ' i ~' 1..1 U/ -I . ~ " ...,." 7 1_ . ~ - C " h . ,,~ ::J-i "96 C-I S U * 7 . r-1-'\..),.-- r "L _I '/ íì(, 1 I I . tè!I,I,IT ¡j R- ~ ~~1 ~:!rl V~\ .~ j i' I . ~ C-I - r I I ~ I-- : r!lC.Q PDRII' IOVI j R-3 ~ ~ Ot> R-2- ~ ~ ~ f I f i I - n; ~ lJ::.^^':1 J 1 I-- 3~:: L/- . :?~.-:. V -=~'iI:;øy:C: r-..~u~~, I ;R-3- "I" ~ I........ [!:'"1 -- i f- -n'" TGS. --I~..!......L . 2000 ~ t= . I-~l C-2 ~~ ;:: =;~¡¡:-~, V '\ to'lLI t- I = ~ '< "- ::: V' r i- g-TI ....... "'517' ..~.' - - A G m ~- I"'ý\'....í"' --; I :è ~~ >- /"'rtf· r I IT ,n-1£ IC-I :-. -¡- L{' ~;¡? ~ ...- roo- I __ ~,-: ..... ~ C ~--~ I r~ rtt ,...- '-...;: \] M1 .. t: tc; , -I ~ L~~ -~ ~~fml!.~v ,~~-i~ Ë~~'f' .~.' =aN. ~r" . ~- J¡~ p ~.- ~ ~ '>\' I /~I po It," ,-\"-....-.J' 0.~;? ,¿-- ~E;' :::~f-1-;/r I t:: '\ ,""'J I' · /.... ,§ç R- ilt . m , ~....~ ^,.A .....:---jì ( AG >-=-·"(t I _'~_ ~ :ç F -- -I. r-;-~ ~~ ':: ~ ~:l- r-- ---0-- .~" i~ ~~'- . ~"'- ~J ,JTTT' ¡ ; T ../LR I ~~71 , I ~ 1 flF R-2 . ~r1m -:1· \- C-I ::: -b\.J'~ , \ L :, "" n- ~80 - ~ T TT1 ~ AG ::: """" I!~~ "IC" , ~.. ( '::j.l ~ t:::::= I I -- ::::tj~ · .. ! ~. r--t- ~f--+-4 FÇ tR-~w ~ , r-+- --=::= t-T-- ~~ 0-:. fr¡;,"-~. . . ....,_ ~"Ç~'-=M ~ ,.g :- ¡¡,~~~ ~ ~ .2. , r---t- ~L.~·-I: r - /,~ C-I ~ P. t-I;·j r _ ... ¡~ '~Q~V,.l. · ,-n-;;;¡ I t=. - 2 · - f ~U I~ ~-'~ ~. : ;~~~( ~ / ru - I 'c ..-.. "1 Ll '. C..r ¡ y ~\ GATF"J\I vz.r .£ f' 'I\I~ ~ - ~637'i~ 1 f'S W I~ . I , & ~ i EDEN _ .eoòe " I -f't'If, fJ.~ AG C-f n7N~~~-.~ ~ ~ L R-2r;~rOO I'TTTT -; "_'- ,/ I~J I :~ill--' \~. ., 'I .d-rk.~... ~.~........ , ~-I 1254 l ""'"--- -- C-I 1198 - --.......... .... ~ R-4-SD 1223 ~ : AG \ R-3 : \ '203 AG ~ \ : rm ..f \, t 'f. ...~ ..~ 0" . 0-1 1220 0-1 120.. 1 AG --.:fI'í .ANT \!,dca 1-= ~a) _ t}:-J j, I-:k-µ ::r ~.Al-H Ib¥f'£-rl ......... 1, r'15~ --I 00\01\. ... no,j -T_ 1- =-=~ II ~-tf~~ I, ~11 t1 ~~ ~- I T-r'T I ~< { ¡ 11' 1 , ' T ~I i ~~:"_ ~.. ffl~SQ [T T_1T~ 11110~J..J~1Jl.: ~.. ~D [1111/1111'111:' ~v T L.. ll· II / \ ",:-.' ~ r I ì rr, ìJ ~'.. + ~ l -~L ~\ '. ~.~.".,. ,.~" _¡~ . ,.. , .1\. '\ V e ',M. { iJ . iF-Oih-i ~ I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I ~ .:..f..-_~"". CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CONSIDERATION OF APRIL , 1986 1. PS 86-20 PS 86-20 APPROVED 2. PS 86-21 PS 86-21 APPROVED ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS MAY 8, 1986 - 7:30 P. M. The meeting was called to order Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P. PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Member Alt. M er Di lanning/Dev. & Z Coordinator Don Bowen John Schwinger Joe Hallford Carole Flippo Richard Royston Wanda Calvert '........... ABSENT: Mark Wood Marjorie Nash Chairman Bowen stated they would have to postpone the approval of the minutes since there are only two present that were present at the April 24th meeting. Request of Jack Roseberry for replat of Lots 2R-2A & 2R-2B, Block 13, Meadowview Estates. Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PS 86-20. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. Request of Chart Development for replat of Tracts 3A, 3B, & 3C, NRH Industrial Park Addition. Ms. Flippo made the to approve PS 86-21 subject the Engineer's comments. s motion was seconded by· Mr. Ha rd and the motion carried 4- 3. PZ 86-14 ~. Request of Harwood Plaza Apartment Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Lot 2, Block 2, Walkers Branch Addition, from its present classification of R-7-MF (Multi-Family) to C-1 (Commercial). This property is located on Grapevine Highway at Emerald Hills Way. ~ - I , . 1- ! .", '", ~ " ,. c:. I Stembridge & Associates, Inc. I I I I I. . ! ¡. . J'F / et I.' , \ I \ i . cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Direcotr of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director fo Development I Ie I . i ~- I 4028 Daley, Suite 103 · North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 . (817) 284-1363 ~ .r ". , :- I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I { ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas Ap r i 1 1 7, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-850, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MEADOWVIEW ESTATES ADDITION, LOT 2R-2A, 2R-28, BLOCK 13, REPLAT, PS 86 - 20, GRID MAP 52 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 2 The developer should be required to escrow his prorata share for future improvements on Rumfield Road and Davis Boulevard. 3 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. ~~~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R\' AI ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development :' 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: Council Meeting Date: Request of Chart Development for Replat of Tract 3A, A PS 86-21 3B, and 3C, NRH Industrial Park Addl.t1on genda Number: 6/9/86 This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Tract 3A, 3B, and 3C, NRH Industrial Park Addition. The property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive south of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad. The purpose for the proposed replat is to subdivide the property to create two lots facing Rufe Snow Drive between Industrial Park Boulevard and Trinidad Drive by dividing these from the major tract. The proposed use for the two lots will be for a convenience store on the south and a Mexican Food restaurant on the north. Due to the fact that the original plat encompassed the entire 79 acre tract the replat also contains the entire subdivision. However, the applicants only propose to develop a small portion of the overall tract. In the Engineer's letter he notes that the engineering submitted is sufficient to cover the development of the two lots facing Rufe Snow Drive. The submittals do not address the development requirements for the remainder of the property. The applicant's Engineer, in his response letter, notes that there is further subdivision of the major tract already in the works which will answer some of the significant questions raised in the Engineer's letter regarding the drainage and the future extension of the street. The Staff also has been in contact with the other parties mentioned in the response letter and has verified that at least two additional property sales in this subdivision are in the planning stages. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Plat Application PS 86-21 requesting rep1at of Tract 3A, 3B, and 3C, NRH Industrial Park Subdivision as submitted subject to the Engineer's comments. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available K t¡j/ ~ I "- City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 - r-- --ì - L 1/ L I I 1·'°7 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I. __ ..,4h:..Jt'"... . ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS MAY 8, 1986 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P. M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Member Al t. Member Dir. Planning/De p & Z Coordin or Don J n Schwinger oe Hallford Carole Flippo Richard Royston Wanda Calvert Mark Wood Marjorie Nash CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF APRIL 24, 1986 hairman Bowen stated they would have to postpone the approval of the minutes since there are only two present that were present at the April 24th meeting. 1. PS 86-20 Request of Jack Roseberry for replat of Lots 2R-2A & 2R-2B, Block 13, Meadowview Estates. Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PS 86-20. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-0. 2. PS 86-21 Request of Chart Development for replat of Tracts 3A, 3B, & 3C, NRH Industrial Park Addition. PS 86-21 APPROVED Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PS 86-21 subject to the Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0. 3. PZ 86-14 Request of Harwood Plaza Apar Joint Venture to rez portion Lot 2, Bloc alkers Branch A n, from its present classification of R-7-MF (Multi-Family) to C-1 (Commercial). This property is located on Grapevine Highway at Emerald Hills Way. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I ( ~~~~ ( jt~II~.S. Engineers, Inc. .':'\...uh ~:. 'dnJhu, PE. :~.-rthtc· F ~~CCk:, PE. ..j~ndn:h .\1. \L:1Ttzn. Jr., PE. SIÙ(l1H! i-i. 'r~¡lg, PE. · Civil Engineerin,g Consttltants · April 30, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-897 N.R.H. Industrial Park Addition Tract 3A, 3B, & 3C PS 86-21, GRID MAP 103 A.R.S. File No. 8624 Dear Sir: The following are comment letter: in response your Engineer's to April 1. City has informed all utility companies of this plat. 2. Telephone numbers are shown on the plat. 3. Property corners are shown on the plat. 4. The 4th and 10th calls are corrected on the plat. 5. Owner's Certificate has been executed. 6. Surveyor's Declaration has been executed. 7. 15 foot building line is shown on the plat. 8. Drainage certificate is shown on the drainage plan. 9. The drainage issue along the railroad will be addressed by Development Company and Tecnol Company when they submit replat of Tract 3C. They are scheduling for approval of plat by JJne, 1986. 22, 1986 Sun for their 5401 North Central Expresstvay, Suite 350 · Dallas, Tèxas 75205 · (214) 522-0970 I ( ( Ie I 10. A 60 foot right-of-way for Boulevard will be dedicated replatting of Tract 3C. the by extention of Industrial Sun Development Company Park while I 11. Fire hydrant coverage is adequate for Tract 3A and 3B. For Tract 3C, the coverage will be provided at the time the development occurs. I 12. The owner will provide his share of the pro-rata charges. 13. The owner is aware of his responsibility for all items mentioned. I 14. The owner is aware of the TESeO's request for easements in Tract 3C. Sun Development Company will resolve that while replatting of Tract 3C. I I With this letter, we are sending nine (9) copies of the Replat and two (2) copies of plans. Please schedule this plat on your next planning and zoning meeting. Thank you very much. I ~ Sincerely, ~ Shiang I SHY/smg Enclosure I I I I I I f I ~ I w.,· Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 8, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-897, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NRH INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDN., TRACTS 3A, 3B, & 3C, REPLAT, PS 86 - 21, GRID MAP 103 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 This is an addition to the comments of our letter dated April 22, 1986. 2 The proposed 6-inch sanitary sewer along Rufe Snow Drive should be increased to 8-inches and the cleanout at the end of the line should be changed to a manhole. 3 The proposed 2-inch water line along the west side of Tracts 3A and 3B should be increased to an 8-inch diameter pipe. A tap should be made at the existing 8-inch water line on the north side of Trinidad Blvd. with an 8-inch tapping valve. The 8-inch line should be extended along the west line of Tracts 3A and 3B and bored under Industrial Park Blvd. as required to tap the existing 8-inch water main on the north side of that street with an 8-inch tapping sleeve and valve. Also, a fire hydrant should be located on this proposed 8-inch line at the northwest corner of Tract 3B. 4 The median in Industrial Park Blvd. should be shortened to allow access to the driveway at the northeast corner of Tract 3B. Please call if you have any questions. ~~W, RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas Ap r i 1 22, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hi Ils 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas /6118 RE: 3-897, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS NRH INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDN., TRACTS 3A, 38, & 3C, REPLAT, PS 86 - 21, GRID MAP 103 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with stanaard Clty procedures. 2 The telephone number of the property owner and the engineer should be included on the plat. 3 In accordance with County requirements, property corner monumentation should be noted on the plat. 4 The fourth and tenth calls in the metes and bounds description should be changed from southeasterly to northeasterly. 5 The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat. 6 A surveyor's seal and signature should be affixed to the plat. 7 A minimum i5-foot front building line, which is required tor 1-2 zoning, should be shown on the platting. 8 In accordance with the SUbdivision Ordinance requirements the Developer's Engineer should attix the fOllowing certification to the drainage plan: 8.1 I, , a professional engineer registered in the State of Texas, have prepared this drainage study in compliance with the latest published requirements and criteria of the City of North Richland Hil Is, and have verifled that the topographic information used in this study is in compliance with said requirements and is otherwise suitable for developing this workable overall Plan of Drainage which can be implemented through proper subsequent detai led construction planning. 1901 CENTRAL OR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I Subdivision Review L~ter continued (:rl INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDN. SIGNATURE , P. E . SE AL 9 Although Tract 3C is included in this replat, no detail drainage plans are shown for this area. We would note that additional storm drainage or channel improvements along the south side of the St. Louis Southwestern Railroad are required. (See Drainage Master Plan Topo Sheets B6 and B7). Most of the drainage on Tract 3C is directed to Industrial Park Blvd. or to the Calloway Branch Channel, however Drainage Area C35a-2, located north of the railroad, discharges under the railroad through a box culvert and runoff then follows the railroad drainage ditch eastward to the Calloway Branch Channel. Overflow from the ditch could cause flooding of future buildings located between the railroad and Industrial Park Blvd. Any construction within the Railroad right-of-way should be approved by the Railway Company. If permission for improvement of the railroad ditch cannot be obtained then dedication of a drainage easement adjacent to the railroad as required for construction of an underground storm drain or __ open channel should be provided. 10 An aO-foot right-af-way extension of Industrial Park Blvd. northward from the cul1de sac to the rai Iroad right-af-way is required for future extension of the throughfare across the railroad to Watauga Road. The centerline of this right-of-way dedicatlon should be terminated at the southeast corner of the City of North Richland Hi Ils Municipal Complex Site Civic Centre Addition located on the north side of the railroad. The centerline of the future throughfare will be located along the east property line of the Civic Centre Addition. 11 We would note that adequate fire hydrant coverage protection has not been provided for this lot based on the 300 foot radius requirement for industrial zoning. 12 The owner should be required to pay his prorata share of an existing 8-inch water line in Trinidad Drive and the existing I6-inch water line in Rufe Snow Drive, if this has not been paid. We would estimate prorata at $5.50 per linear foot tor one-half of equivalent 8-inch line for a total length of 617.06 feet. 13 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responslDle tor all provlslons of the SuDdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. ~ Apri 1 22, 1986 PS 86 - 21 PAGE 2 I I_ I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I ~- I I Subdivision Review Le(.:.er continued Please call if you have any questlons. ~æeJU(J. RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. R\~A/ ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, Clty Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of PuDlic Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development ~ " Apri 1 22, 1986 PS 86 - 21 r(1 I NDUSTRIAL PARK ADON. P AG E 3 I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I (- '- ~,>' (/ Mr. R. S. Williams TESCO Region Engr. Supervisor P.O. Box 970 Fort Worth, TX 76101 RE: City File Reference Number: PS 86-21 .NRH Industrial Park Addition, Tracts 3A, 3B, & 3C Address or Location: East side of Rufe Snow Drive at Trinidad Drive Attached is a print of the above named subdivision for review of the proposed layout in terms of the requirements of your office. Please return your comments to Wanda Calvert. Planning and Zoning Coordinator, City of North Richland Hills, P.O. Box 18609, North Richland Hills, Texas, 76118 on one (1) copy of this form no later than 4/16/86. Layout fully satisfies requirements of this office. ~ Layout is satisfactory subject to additional information or minor corrections being shown on attached plat. (See Comments) Layout requires major revision before proper evaluation can be made. (See Comments) COMMENTS: TESCO: DATE: tf - & -- ~(p SIGNATURE~.9 ~J ì)E CITY: ..2J~ O~ DATE: 4/7/86 SIGNATURE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ie I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: Council Meeting Date: 6/9/86 Subject: Request of Jack E. King for Replat of Lot 9-R, Block 4, Diamond Loch Addition. PS 86-22 Agenda Number: This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lot 9R, Block 4, Diamond Loch Addition. The property is located on the south side of Tabor Drive between Lariat Drive and Diamond Loch Drive. The purpose for the proposed plat is to add an additional unplatted tract to the rear of the residence to the existing lot to allow the applicant to build on the rear of the combined lot. The Engineer's comments have all been satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Replat Application PS 86-22 requesting replat of Lot 9R, Block 4, Diamond Loch Addition as submitted. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Opera . g Budget o er Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable ignature I¿f{/~ City Manager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Paqe 1 of 1 1._. I Ie I t u* '5 ß~-I e.AC.t.oWA~ ACR£S L. 31t W.1.-24-8" o ~ o I AP I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, MAY 22, 1986~- 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF APRIL 24, 1986 CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUT OF MAY 8, 1986 1. PS 86-17 APPROVED 2. PS 86-22 PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Members The meeting was called to order by Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P. M. Alt. Member Dir. of Plannin P & Z Coordin Bo en chwinger M Wood arjorie Nash Joe Hallford George Tucker Richard Royston Wanda Calvert ABSENT: Carole Flippo od made the motion to approve minutes as written. This motion s seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Schwinger and Mr. Hallford abstaining since they were not present at the meeting. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Wood and Ms. Nash abstaining since they were not present at the meeting. Request of Kenneth C. Whiteley, Trustee for replat of Lots 24R and 25 thru 29, Block 1, Oak Hills Addition. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 86-17. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Jack E. King for replat of Lot 9-R, Block 4, Diamond Loch North Addition. Chairman Bowen stated that since this was a replat in residential zoning there would be a Public Hearing. He opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 P & Z Minutes May 22, 1986 PS 86-22 APPROVED 3. PS 86-23 . /~? /ç PS 86-23/ APPROVED ~.ð / 4. PS 8¥24 /' / ¿~/ .-y' ( ( There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PS 86-22. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Don Wayne Guthrie for replat of Lot 8-R, Block Loch North Addition. Chairman Bowen stated that this is a replat in residentia zoning there would be a Pub Ii earing. Chairman Bowen d the Public Hearing and cal ä for those wishing to speak in f or of this request to please come orward. ing no one wishing to speak in fav of this request, the Chairman c led for those wishing to speak in pposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 86-23. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Rischon Development Corporation for final plat of Cars ton Court Addition. Scott Stewart with Levitt Engineers came forward to represent Rischon Development. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas April 24, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hi Ils 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas ¡b118 RE: 3-899, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS DIAMOND LOCH NORTH ADDITION, LOT 9R, BLOCK 4, REPLAT, PS 86 - 22, GRID MAP 138 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard Clty procedures. 2 The survey name, IIVan Dusenll, is misspelled in the title. 3 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and POlicy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. t(),~ RICHARU W. ALBIN, P.E. RW A / r a Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, Clty Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I' I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: 6/9/86 Subject: Council Meeting Date: Request of Don Wayne Guthrie for Replat of Lot 8R, Block 4, Diamond Loch Add1t10n. PS 86-23 Agenda Number: This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lot 8R, Block 4, Diamond Loch Addition. The property is located on the south side of Tabor Drive between Lariat Drive and Diamond Loch Drive. This lot is adjacent to the replat request PS 86-22. The purpose for this requested replat is also to allow the utilization of the additional property in the rear of the existing lot. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Replat Application PZ 86-23, requesting replat of Lot 8R, Block 4, Diamond Loch Addition as submitted. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable iC1Il/~ I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Paqe 1 of 1 I I 1 -I I SU* '5 ( e.At.c.øw.-y ACR5S L. 31t ÞI.Z-24-8¿' o o I p. I' I_ I Page 2 p & Z Minutes May 22, 1986 ( ( I There being no one wishing to s the Chairman called for t wishing to speak in opposit to this request to please com rward. I T eing no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. I I Mr. Hallford made the motion to approve PS 86-22. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. 3. PS 86-23 Request of Don Wayne Guthrie for replat of Lot 8-R, Block 4, Diamond Loch North Addition. I I Chairman Bowen stated that since this is a replat in residential zoning there would be a Public Hearing. Ie Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. I I There being no one wishing to speak in favor of this request, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. I There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. I PS 86-23 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 86-23. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. I I _____ I ------ -~ I I Request of Rischon Development Corporation for final 0 Carston Court Addi · 4. PS 86-24 Scott Stewart with Levitt Engineers came forward to represent Rischon Development. ., .; I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 6/9/86 - Council Meeting Date: Request of Ike Harris & Company for Final Plat of Windsor Park Addition PS 86-25 Agenda Number: This Final Plat Application is presented for consideration of Windsor Park Subdivision. The property is located on the north side of Chapman Road east of Rufe Snow Drive. The subject tract is zoned R-6T Townhome District. The purpose for the proposed plat is to subdivide the property into lots to be developed as a townhome project. All of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Final Plat Application PS 86-25 requesting platting of Windsor Park Subdivision as submitted. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Avai lable )7 ¡¿~ ' ~~ , ity Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director PaQe 1 of 1 -~ "I~~ ,~--- I --'jt"- ~, \ \~~'\ \ 1,IUl , ,a__-rn ~_ \.'-.r: ",t" ".,;,;~ /.' '~~~/I."'" ," 1!=.~" :~~ .' · rn '" ',i ..L,~S ~ 0.. r- ~-;--:~"I'JJJ'" r, '~'. ~"r- r ~]'~ ~ ' . \ \ __ r- ~--T":~_...~ '¿".. , " ", I--- '! I : I' ¡ : ': Ii' E ' , ¡ ';r:111t!, I : ! I I '~ì r---T' , , " . ! f t:: t=:f.~>. I ,', I : ' I ~ ~ 1, i I I I II . ' 'I ' ", ;:::: '. ~I.ll " , I , '---'--' _ ¡ 'I Ii. ,I '.' . I, I- ..- r-; ,.'.':'~ . , " -~ _ _ 1:= ·r .~~, ~"Iw~~,'.: " : ,'I r--¡!II;'ì¡~rff' .' \ . ~'DJ ffijJ=, . Ë;:~I j--1 'i~ t:!ll I 1111TITI:ITrl I ~' h ' . ~ffiffiEÐ~ -'bi ' ~~ 'ar--- J ,,=:1'"1 b-...:l: lllJ ¡I 1lTì1 l' J, , , . \ i :~..:: . ~!:!!~ i'~,' " ;t-r-j:' ~ ~ü:fÏf ~ :/ , ~L I .LL.!3. I / _"\ ~~l~~~.llliÙlliJtl li'~; f:' ~~:~ J ~' '\ - i~!-cm ~iq-¡ ! IIII i U h- I ! I· , ~ \ , , ' ~;~~ i' ,I ::::WI 'J-\ ~m-, \.~~:: ,:11= ~H¡II¡¡i¡¡ II- I .~l!~ '"~ 1"',':,' I ,. ~'" ~~( I~:: ... '.. ~, ", . / I, ,I ,.l: 1,¡~Yj'I~'~U~£ 'êl' n, ; " u.tEr.E-~T ¡ f a- ' !>.s\' IJ--+-H-. . .1.~j IÞ;-U' '~ '.'. ~ ~i '..., D , .-t ~;'''':::~ rrrm _ ~ ~', . ~, . ., ~, I ,', ¡I, " , ,._'~ r:::I R-7- MF _ ~, T~¡';¡ JI ~'--1~~; ~h:.. "~&~~~, I FSr-" §r-:ww~1 ~ ~\~ . J ~~~~; '~~ ' I ~ , .,- . > _ ~ . .~I-" ¡¡_ -~¡~y \ ~ / I' ~~)o = tiI~lm~ ..2.!!.. L :::zr-~JD ;:: -'~ :---i ; ';n -I' C - I ~ '>-rï--r-, +-1~, · . I J.IV~ ' ! I' ¡¿.,.' -' Á. ¡::: ~ · -¡;~V --.1 I I 1:= Ii I: I I ¡ II ,r¡!\I1 fr< , ! I , Il 8 I ª ~. :r- I~c-I " v. R-2 ........... su* 112~ . ~ ì I 1 II ' __ ' ~-- !ij I I ';:: ~ "-'P; ~t.. ~~ 'I '!Ji~~_ r-'-~ ~.,I ~;: I ~ t::, r-~ -~I T' ;:: fj-J lit . it ~ tî:, Lllfot'-.I '~~I¡l~_ H.(~f4t w~ _,_ J:J ,- , ! ' t~ r i I J '- ; ~ ....~,s;.J.~ r:~ Ë Ie OJ D ~ ! 'lr.. ~~~ 11") ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ,~~~ !i ~~ PAR.~ ~ s-¡ "1ii1- . t-f ¡;; , rt::rJ >-!D=: ~:. .,. Ë 1166 ~;~. ~¡~; C 2 ~.. 12ks ~;" U~'~'I1-Þ. I 'I I í I I ! -i=-!L.-I I I j L R: .., ~ ~:::::t:::: 'I I I I F::U r I I I ~'d S u I o· ~",=E: : H'H I .'N' I ~ "ì"U¡ I ""V. ~~~R PsC,,!1'1 = =::: I' I I H LJ OM I /f Q ~r!:(;:..! ~ ~nl T 11 1'J....q"1Æ:i" ,\ ; ~.- I r I I I I _ Ñ t Ll iCJ~fï"" I:Oj I_~ f~ ~. c~ 5~rrìl III IIJ/~ ~~' ~\ ~ I 1\= I, 1 ,f~¡ ~ I ¡I, f~R, i II IJ.. ~ H · - T II I 1 L~r::::l - I .!"I_ I I I J ~ ~ ~PII~ì;r~~lliill~;~~~¥j ~ I~ iW;; ftL ,\11 I 1/ 1 EtJta' I I t I ~~ ~Jm \ ,~-I ·~I I II I ~ fJJ II ,I I fJ ~ ¡ J Œ :::J,.. f. ~~1 + è1 7 .. II .., I I ,::; '~i.~ d t:fil ~ rT1 T of.'{~'f. c,+~ II I j I~t- L-..è * 1. , " I ," '" ~ '''' ", 'Y< 1,." ,\1 I I r.to':;' t- III I I II II III I I I r l.1;:' "'''''.-r= ! _vi I flC C-2 C-2 I , ' : . S- 1 L- ~C-I 1176 1176 \ AG \ AG ! I \1 /1 II~ \ F.p. \ I IT,' ~ ^- /! 'Ic- -Slt.' ~o R-7-MF I AGAG \ \ ,0.J.\.11 ' lJ I , C.:.. 1184 ~y." ~6 U \ R-7- ~ " ': T í :: '\, .'>-~.., F~~ 5' /266 ~ \ M F 1 ·r'·""" 1 .'j ! ~~\\" - r- .t., ........... I(.;-I-SU· , ~\ J ~~ ' ~~ft_ r'I~_r- E 1214 . ~T=l.IU .. .\. /, ~.. 1 11 T := 1 _A f f--J : .";;,- ,Ti11¡·J '\''("ð~, ~~~ ~,T I' :.'. ;= ¡' I ,I l.j E i - , 1 HI ~~~, .1 iJ.ffllE: ' \Þ-" .~"f.., __ 'I :::~ : , ~ "......'-õõ I 2 ,,(~ps D~_ -ð/ . ð~ ~ ~~~ Jc---,"" ~ ^~,2J~I ,II~I/1 I,';' ; T - \ ~~~~, ~A/."J';;~~f;;IJ~J4~PAÆÞ.t:'~T\.~,_..IIL J[\1 .1 ..,¿' If c~," ~ß"/" ,.' ~ ~ ·.RDl, ~ 11:5' f 1~1iI1. ~,\:"'~I~''''J-I''~II' ";~-::: .-f47ïc. ... ~Iii'. ;;1, L >.ITT1ì - , \ -' L. .' ...."..., .... T ,... \ J ;---¡~, I -"--- " , ¡ ! I I 'I! I ~J c t: _ '.~ L_lt::~~-!. -..: . I ~ 1 ~ _ V" ':!! " ;1 . ë::i::'~ :i:i:":'~ '"=6 C:i::J: - - t::~ t=J-~ ~ ,l J:t J.. !, I-i 1. .,t:\.J. IN C- '=~r- r-:; J - ~ -~--, - ~ - '----!" JJ ~'- CJ -':= ~I-- ~_ :! .~~ ~-'................, ;::-- - 1- '""-- ~ JSi -" ..~ .U· __ ~~ III-;~T"L~ ~~ ~- '~ -... ID. ~L'\ !.I ~ ~ ~ . -' jò~ to-- _,...- .y ~ - "~r t-- p.-~ '"' ~ I:§~ ~c~§ ~ ~ -u L c tì't~ ~P£: :--!~ l! ¡ L ~ tr;' ¡ \ 11 r ¡ j 11 ~ ~i-" J.~' H r-'; T ? I I I - ~I ST DR I I -. I I I - - --. )1 l' ~ ~ ¡ ....s.. l.&!!..' AC -« tV .t ~ \.. I 1U1 Ie l~ft3 11- I RC':" C-I ~ jar: ".. r AG ~ u~ LlJJJJlJ - :::T::1 C::Ht"n--r-rï _ ~ Ji ,,_;, E\ : I I ~ ;::c~ .1 ~Lè. ...Ji ...., - ~ ~ .... - rm- _.1-. '- ~"'\,- IJ\...L.L - ~ - -.:...r .r 1 ;::_ ~ tr1n3Wrlli ~ Pr1 I H1ml :: I I - I R-' f z ~~ I :n~Cf ~~ .'n I T f ~ ~ " 1'r I~ ,~ I~ I ~ ,I N: 1"I6JJ I ' ~ ~ , ~ ~ , " }:: ~ // ,~ '1l , , , I I \\ ~~ F:R " / " I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I Page 4 P & Z Minutes May 22, 1986 ( 5. PS 86-25 PS 86-25 APPROVED ~ ( Mr. Stewart said he did not feel t s is what the ordinance states. H said they are asking for a variance relief of this ordinance. Mr. Wood said a variance rom the lot size does not have the same impact as allowing water to go over lots. Mr. Stewart sai they are requesting that they be t on the next City Council age Bowen stated the Commission charged to review these re ests and until they are satisfied, ey will not send it on to the Council. Mr. John Hawkins came forward. He asked if the Commission would pass this plat subject to getting this worked out with the City Engineer and City Staff. Chairman Bowen stated he felt it should be resolved before it is passed on to the Council. Ms. Nash made the motion to table PS 86-24 until such time as the Staff, City Engineer and Rischon Development Corporation can attain a compromise or resolve the differences. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Ike Harris & Company for final plat of Blocks 1-5, Windsor Park Addition. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PS 86-25. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. I Ie I I I I I I I lit I I I I I I -- I I ( ( ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS May 13, 1 986 EVERAGE, SMITH FARRINGTON & Associates, Inc. Mr. Richard Royston Director of Development City of North Richland Hills p ..0. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: Windsor Park Addition - Blocks 1-5 ESF A Project No. 860040 ·1i~~ttlll:f:a.~t ~~'k)co"~~"';n¡""'''I''t.1.'(t''-':''.'''W?~' 2630 W. Freeway Suite 100 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Metro 429-7560 Dear Mr. Royston: This letter is in response of the letter dated May 2, 986, from Richard Albin with Knowlton, English, Flowers, Inc. The following items will address those comments in the original format. I. Our client, Dick Blackard, has talked to you and it is our understanding that the subdivision name, Windsor Park, is acceptable. 2. The owners acknowledgement, dedication statement and notary certification on the plat have been fully executed. 3. The surveyors seal and signature have been affixed to the final plat. 4. The owners of the adjacent property west of this proposed subdivision are noted on the plat. 5. All plans have been signed and sealed by a registered professional engineer. 6. Property corner monumentation is noted on the plat. 7. An engineer has signed and sealed the requested statement concerning drainage study. 8. The off-site drainage swales have been riprapped in the vicinity of discharge flumes Band C for erosion control. 9. The developer is aware of the pro rata share for paving improvements and is currently working on paying these assessments. 10. The developer is aware of the pro rata due on the existing water line and is working on paying this assessment. II. 500 foot fire coverage radius criteria has been circled on the water and sewer layout. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I ( ( 12. This reads Line Series Test, on the basis that this should be LimeSeries Test, the developer is hiring an independent soils testing laboratory to perform these tests and the appropriate lime and density test will be run prior to and during construction. 13. I have talked this particular item over with Gene Riddle and he has agreed that the easement can remain as 15 foot as long as it reads Drainage Easement and not Drainage and Utility Easement. 14. We have changed the sewer cleanouts to manholes. 15. We have oversized the sewer in Drifield Circle East from a 10 inch to a 12 inch and have oversized the sewer in Drifield Circle from 8 inch to 10 inch with the understanding that the City will pay for a two inch oversizing in both cases. It is also our understanding that if the City participation is less than $5,000.00 then the developer can negotiate a contract and provide the City with the information regarding what the oversize amount is. 16. An additional manhole has been installed in the proximity requested. 17. It is our understanding that this 15' minimum sideyard building line refers to a backyard set back since it is the backyard that is adjacent to the R3 zoning. 18. We have indicated water and sanitary sewer line sizes on the water and sewer layout sheets. 19. We have provided four foot of cover where possible in the design of this subdivisi on. 20. We have removed the "Preliminary Not For Construction" stamp and have sealed these plans. 21. The developer has read this identification statement. We would appreciate if you could review these plans at your earliest convenience and if you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, , FARRINGTON & ASSOCIATES, INC. erc I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas May 2, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-951, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WINDSOR PARK ADDITION, BLOCKS 1 THROUGH 5, FINAL PLANS, PS 86 - 25, GRID MAP 76 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 As noted in our review letter dated Dec. 4, 1985 , we would recommend that the name of this proposed subdivision be changed to the Richfield Addition and the lots and blocks renumbered accordingly. 2 The Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and Notary Certification on the plat should be fully executed before approval. 3 The Surveyor's Seal and signature should be affixed to the final plat. 4 The names of the owners of the adjacent property west of this proposed subdivision should be noted on the plat. 5 All construction plans should be signed and sealed by a Registered Professional Engineer. 6 In accordance with County requirements, property corner monumentation should be noted on the plat. 7 In accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements the Developer's Engineer should affix the following certification to the drainage plan: 7.1 I, , a professional engineer registered in the State of Texas, have prepared this drainage study in compliance with the latest published requirements and criteria of the City of North Richland Hills, and have verified that the topographic information used in this study is in compliance with said requirements and is otherwise suitable for developing this workable overall Plan of Drainage which can be implemented through proper subsequent detailed construction planning. SIGNAruRE , P. E . SEAL 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -. I I Subdivision Review L~ter continued ( WINDSOR PARK ADDITION 8 The off-site drainage discharge swale should be fully concrete lined in the vicinity of the proposed concrete discharge flumes "B" and "C" to provide erosion protection at these locations. Details of this concrete riprap erosion protection should be provided in the plans. 9 The developer should be required to pay his prorata share of paving improvements on Chapman Drive if such payments have not already been made. The developer should also be required to pay for the additional widening costs on Chapman Drive as covered in Change Order No.2 to the Chapman Drive Contract between North Richland Hills and APAC-Texas Construction Company. The extra turn lane widening cost is $12.92 per linear foot. Based on a frontage of 549.84 feet, the additional cost for this widening totals $7,103.93. 10 The developer should be required to pay his prorata share of the existing 8-inch water main in Chapman Drive. We would estimate $5.50 per linear foot for one-half of the water line for a total length of 549.84 feet and a total cost of $3,024.12. 11 Circles of fire hydrant coverage protection based on 500-foot radius criteria for this zoning should be shown on the water layout plan. Full coverage of the entire platted area is required. 12 Line series tests shall be performed by an approved testing firm and report results furnished to the City for review. Street subgrade stabilization materials and quantities shall be based on the results of the subgrade soils tests. 13 The Public Works Department has requested that the proposed drainage discharge flume easements be increased from 15 to 20 feet in width as required for proper access and maintenance. 14 The proposed sanitary sewer cleanouts should be replaced with 4-foot diameter manholes' on Aston Drive, Brixham Drive, and Cheswick Drive. 15 We would recommend that the proposed 10-inch sanitary sewer main in Driffield Circle East be increased to a 12-inch line from Chapman to the northeast corner of this proposed development. Also we would recommend that the proposed 8-inch sewer main in Driffield Circle be increased to a 10-inch diameter. These mains will be extended northward as required for future service to adjacent future developments and also serve as relief lines to Foster Village to help relieve potential overloaded conditions in the existing lO-inch sanitary sewer main in Hightower. 16 An additional manhole should be provided on the proposed sanitary sewer main in Driffield Circle West at about lot 6, block 1. 17 A minimum side building line of 15-feet is required when R-6-T lots abut R-3 zoning. May 2, 1986 PS 86 - 25 PAGE 2 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -- I I Subdivision Review LS:ter continued ( HINDSOR PARK ADDITION 18 Water and sanitary sewer service line sizes should be noted on the water and sewer layout sheets. 19 At least 4-feet of cover above sanitary sewer lines should be maintained if possible. 20 We note that the plans submitted to our office for review are stamped "Preliminary, Not for Construction". Although this submittal is preliminary, the plans submitted for review should accurately reflect actual proposed construction. Any deviation from reviewed and Commission/Council approved construction plans should be noted on "As-built" plans and a copy of such as-builts transmitted to our office and the City for updating permanent Public Works records. 21 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. Please call if you have any questions. , (ß. ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RW A / r a Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development t~ay 2, 1986 PS 86 - 2 5 PAGE 3 I Ie I I I I I I I II I I I I I I '- I I ( ( KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas December 4, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-951, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WINDSOR PARK ADDITION, BLOCKS 1 THRU 5, PRELIMINARY PLAT, PS 85 - 91, GRID MAP 76 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 Since this proposed plat is contiguous with the "Richfield Addition", we would recommend that the subdivision name be changed from "Windsor Park Addition" to the IIRichfield Additionll and the lot and block numbers revised accordingly. 2 The Owner1s Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of the final plat. 3 In accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements the Developer's Engineer should affix the following certification to the drainage plan: 3.1 I, , a professional engineer registered in the State of Texas, have prepared this drainage study in compliance with the latest published requirements and criteria of the City of North Richland Hills, and have verified that the topographic information used in this study is in compliance with said requirements and is otherwise suitable for developing this workable overall Plan of Drainage which can be implemented through proper subsequent detailed construction planning. SIGNATURE ,P.E. SEAL 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 e BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021- e 817/283-6211 e. METRO/267-3367 ",' '---~"""-~":: ,'4¡" ~...~,.~, ...............-,..,. .......~~h ... ."., I Ie I I I I I I I II I I I I I I '- I I ._"'~,I1it1';""""". ( ( Subdivision Review Letter continued WINDSOR PARK ADDITION 4 The developer's engineer should verify that the existing channel adjacent to this development is sufficiently deep to allow the flowlines of storm drains connected to the channel to match the flowline of the channel and still have at least one foot of cover over the storm drain pipes outside the limits of the channel. Lowering of the channel or filling above the storm drains within the proposed subdivision area may be required; or a combination of the two. 5 All water line intersections should have a valve on at least two of the intersecting lines. 6 We would recommend that the proposed sanitary sewer line in Driffield Drive, which is extended to the northwest corner of this subdivision for connection to adjacent future developments, be increased from 6-inch diameter to at least 8-inch diameter. 7 Our records indicate Chapman Drivels right-of-way along this platting is approximately 63 feet wide. 8 As a general reminder, the Developer or OWner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, Water and Sewer Policies and Procedures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory codes. if you have any questions. ø~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Allen Bronstad, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development December 4, 1985 PS 85 - 91 2 PAGE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 6/9/86 - Council Meeting Date: Request of Eagle Outdoor for Approval of A Billboard SO 86-9 Sign on Loop ~LU Agenda Number: Eagle Outdoor, an advertising company has submitted a request for approval of a billboard sign location. The proposed location is on the south side of Loop 820 approximately 1750 feet west of Rufe Snow Drive. The site proposed is in an undeveloped tract which is currently zoned 1-2 Industrial. The applicants are proposing to place the billboard at the west end of the industrial tract. This location, according to the applicant's measurements is approximately 2500 feet from the existing billboard to the west which is located on the Railroad right of way and approximately 8000 feet from the nearest billboard to the east. However, the adjacent property to the west of the proposed site, while not in use, is zoned U-Institutional and is the undeveloped portion of the tract belonging to the Richland Hills Church of Christ. In order to adhere to the strictest interpretation of the Ordinance the location of the sign should be at least 100 feet east of the west property line of the subject tract. The applicant also notes that there are two non-conforming wood construction billboards on the property. He proposes that both of these signs will be removed as a condition of approval of the proposed sign. RECOMMENDATION: It is Staff's opinion that the proposed Billboard Sign can meet the Ordinance criteria if the location is moved to provide the necessary clearance with the U Zoned tract and may be approved with that stipulation. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget ~ A £?~, -r! ~ ~~epart~~~re ' -~¿~ CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director PaQe 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I ~ I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST PERMIT NUMBER TYPE OF SIGN '702,~ t~AI¿~(,',;'1 011' $P1'$-4- .s-W #~TE M"Y Z/j75't NAME OF APPLICANT/BUSINESS £At/IE O,,/Jx,¡¿ -of ADDRESS .?Io/¿ h;:¡;ml 'D,"1. 6,,///1$( ~ 7$'.;7.;1'1 PHONEdty'-Ý»-7.259 LOCATION OF SIGN ~ou.J'- ~Jt! ot úxp ~?t:J Al:[Þ'7o¡(' t ~7&O' 0;.cf 0/ ì/u'" Q()W Áh. SIGN LOCATION ON LOT tAli( ~.sl t'~.i. , NAME OF CONTRACTOR '/£<7 5.lr;.-.f to. C''I ADDRESS //I?fl 5". /¡)C ;;A/¿- /'?cI. &/! /Ó~ "7Y' . , PHONE rJ, 7-/r~ WIDTH OF LOT FACING QUALIFYING STREET It II , , SIGN TAKING UP PARKING SPACE(S) YES NO v- BLOCKING FIRELANES YES NO ~ESTIMATED SIGN VALUE $ dO odD PERMANENT OR BILLBOARD FILING FEE $50.00 + ESTIMATED COST WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE BUILDING STRUCTURE OR LAND TO WHICH OR ON WHICH THE STRUCTURE IS TO BE ERECTED OR SIGN TO BE PAINTED. YES 0 *************************************************************************** THE UNDERSIGNED AGREE TO CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE SIGN ORDINANCE 111001, 1-24-83, AND OTHER ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, AND ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITIES F ERECTING THIS SIGN. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT APPROVED BY DATE SIGNED M1 ë:f Ira APPROVED DATE PLEASE ATTACH ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO THE BACK OF THIS FORM. I Ie I I I I I I I P I I I I I I '- I I EAGLE OUTDOOR May 15, 1986 City of North Richland Hills City Secretary North Richland Hills, TX Dear City Secretary, Eagle Outdoor requests permission to appear before the North Richland Hills City Council on Monday, June 9th, 1986 in order to obtain a sign permit for the erection of an off-premise advertising sign. Please send information regarding this request to the address shown below. elY., ¿/-) /I~ Hall SAH:rrb 3611 Regent Drive · Dallas, Texas 75229 . (214) 357-7486/170 - 7.2.3 7 II ~. ~ '\ tJlt>·,~,Or::>· E ~e I I I ~ . I ~ s f. " J. ~ ~ Ir- :\\ ~ I I , I ì i I :- I I '" 8 . . z f1' .. r- 8 " (» ~ <i.-\ + \w- ~ . .:.. -J )Þ ...¡ - _.~ l' ~ -t ~~ N E å : 8. I' I ~ I I ~ - -.!.~ ~ -J-~ ~ ~ ~A4e ~ I UT' L I TV e~IW\T:1 ~OL. 3aa- \OS I I~ - '''6. 34 I U\ I I IS~ 0" I " ~ - - - ~ .-.- . ~~ I · CD -- :"' ~ I . I I , I I I I I I I I \ ~ ~. ~{k w U\ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~~.:. ~ () . .. z:.. ~-; >, ~ () c N ""'" .... ..~~ -.¡ ~ ~~ N () ~ ~ (~ :- ..... U. " ~ ~~ ~ ~ )a 6' -.& ~ Q.. -:::.. C8 ~ , ~ ~,~ ~ u ~:.t:...~ \..Þ ~. ~ ~ f~ ,.~. ~ ~ - t · ~ :1' - . >.. ....>. ! '3 . ~ '" C? (\. \J\ ~~ ~ - C- i~ ~ ~ ,~ \31 (g -J o \J1 \ \ I ~I ¡ )\ \ ~ ~ \ }Þ\ , I ~ I I ~ ~ I ~I "'I I ~ Q-~J I - ~ /::' I I~~-S ,/ ..... ~ -' ...... I ...~ ,~ Ii: ~ i I I \ \ \ I I " I I I So' "" '" . N - --1 . ., ~ \r :5 ~ ~ t~ {\..t\.... ~&- 'i:.. r-J ~t ~ ~t: ~~ ----~ z: -\ ~ ~ þ! --\ ro ~ . H >i t ~ ~"'\1 ~ ~ f'. , ;t-- ~ "- --..... ~ 't) ~ ~ \t, ~. ~~ :I:. §\ ]:.. ~ ~ r- },.:\ ~ ~.- ~ Q ~? ~ f'-:- -4 t,,",, '-. ..w" ;¡ ~ t' (~ ~ ~ '- <::~. "" :'110 ,.... \1 .... ..... f\ ~ ~ o ~ ~~ r- - r t ~ d ~ (') .'. , . J ~citfl' , - r¢~O'" ~ce . ~. ~ . 1-...· Jr<..r't:.:' .' . ..: I': " . .,1. .....~.... . ". . .. -i ~¡~i)":'''' ..'. '. -f :..~"'¡_' .. ·"'~··.;.£f·~ . ",: '-- ," , W' i ':; \" ~ :' ~~f~ :,_ .. ._~ .-~. ":. . '.' '!~..'...~~,.~:~ . ''i'::': " . :? ,y' :. ~h...r. . :. )./ .',' . ~ .' , ~ . ':. .~ .. ,. " ~ "" ~. :~ I :: ~. .. . . '. '. . ~.;::: ;," ~+.. ~. j.~,~ : ~:,', _ .. '. .. .: .:.; '·r;)..:~.·.;:.,~.~,:-.~'.~.,.:.~ ~.~.:;: ~:: \'.' - ~.;' . ..... _ .. . ,.....~ ':i. :\. .. .>, ~',. ''''''", . h' '. ..,,·1~· · ';.. .......::.. ~ . ~ ", 'Vc : ._~, I· .-.;~--..' ..'''.:,~.., ~ . ~'l~.. >.~:.~.;,:·,:r. ;{.H~.~.~.X: :·;.·,'.·i'~ ". ··~T.·'.'· . < r ~. == ..').\,':.......¡:. ~:.<-7'''·<¡.,:.... "'~' S- '¡-.. .. ....,.~.'._...\,....'rr.... "'~. .:<~" . :', . >.;ft..~..:~.. .:..~_:~.:¡~~,. :. "/~' ~ .~...,:·:~.ð~... ¡~.-.;:1)E,~j:.~"..~;~"," '-:'~....:J. '~',' . .... '. ',' ~" 'I."~' "..' , ~.'<:';T"'~;:.?,~,. .. " _ ._ ,.t. .".:. ~~.,.:-: . ,. ....'\ 'I .:'" ~ "'.. ';'1 ,... " ", '! '~ .......~'i ~:~. .,:J:~:. ~ ' í '. .' h-. ~. ~: ,:;., .,~ < :~: ·~.r:, :_.;. .~",'., ,:t: ,.. ,." ,;, '.. · I .~ '~. :'~:".. . ~- ~'- ij': :~ ,..' 1'.,: . -Ì' ...,.::.:~.. ::...~,;.~.. '~:ft:$·~~f,,~.~....:~ . :..'~ ~r...:.t.~.~..:.~ :' ;:!~. ;. ~. ~s~· ~~~i\t ~~, 'I;X~;' .~, ~&:~F~; i;·:.:· ~~',::,i.. ~:.'~~.~. ,":~:'.: y. '·;r·, . ~. :.::~~~~~r ~.- ~ __,' ~ .' .,~..?,~ .. .~.~,;. I,' ;';;'/' ~ : ~. ';'~'~i~ ~~:r . <.:, ~;'~: t:)~~ : ,:.~(~i ~ . ". ; {t~.> ~'~. " :', »:. ~:: I'r~: :J~ .. . .... , . .' . ~,~ '. , {r>:,:~·N~·.~·;~:'r:·" ;'~~~;' ;t:t·ð\:~~~··· .,. ~:.~ '. . .;.? >:1~~~;..-,::_~.'.~.~,.~.~.:.~~.~,'.~~.....¡.~,r~·~,:~~._~.~T·¡.;~'~.'~_:_.~'...~~:,:,.~~:.: i.;.t.;· - .;:.; :..~" ,l~ . .....1.' ~'-:. ~ '~~. ~ :' >¡.~ .' à~: ,; , no"';' ~\:;,- ::::~" -,-. . ~.- . .~ , " '. ..' , :"'. .: . '-'., . -..~ ~. ~~ ,~,~), ~~,¡- . ';;'t '-.V·~· .}~1j""'- <; ~n:~ ';'.~ .. .,>r'··:;;L!;~,~~·if;·:,it:·;t~~~:::. :~J;:, .J\~E l~t~ ~., ';d , . '~:.' :: ¡;~;~~tS~"~/? ':¡",·':,~...~'.i.f.~ ..... '·'~~~"~V".., ,,}.. ..-1' '\1~'"' "t)i~~l'. .t~~'4~~..·r.,_;;·.:-'~ 4:'~~~ ·;'..i$~\"· :~~ f.',,; " ~m"~'~ 1'.-", ~.. ',' I~ i"'f>" J .,~ . "'d ~ ,. ~ ~ i 4·:';' . ' . ~ ~:~, ~ ,. ~:~;¡. ~ . , I· "i.,:·~~f· ".;.,! ~.:~~~~.,:i~.:.~.~.~ :~.~~.·~...t.i~:· .j~ ~~l~ · ' ~; ¡~i,:..': .,.:.~~.~,'.: ~..~;~>.. ;·.~,~;!¿.:~:·,;,::.:'.i.~r,::~.: :~'i ~,.'.i.l.~.:~,· · I J .~ Ý ly.·'~,.~:: ·:,::j;"~.:'.l.·.~.t, .~',,' '. ;~, ". ;,'.. f,: . . -. . ,...., ~ ,'.~~." :~ . ~~ ~·~,.~,~l·· I:?; ~ ¡1t~/;~~"'~~ ;"j~;~f .~, ~'}'l ;4~;" t~:i:;~ ~ ... . . ~~.' . ." :,. . -'.: ;:.'"~' : < ¡~; ~. · '~\~;. '~1~~t~!~J~;: ;. 0' '.. ~i.~~/ z: ;~ -~iI'?~ '~..{"f.~~i~~~?:<~~¥.:~::f'~~-s.'. ".. "" ..~.:~;'~~~~t tt~,.' ~~i:: ~_,;~;.~' ,~J.,~:,!.·:7.!.~· ,.~,L..~~ .,' " :~~~\h.{~~~:~ ß~.;.·.~.:,i,,;.:~..~1~~~~,;· ~~ .~ ;:..:~i..' ~~:' ~;"~ ~'':i:l'" i.c~":: ; ..-<'\~~~~~ , ~:':' or. . ~~; ~~:c~~') .:;¡¡~!~~. , Ji'. 1· ~I ~i·i~-.· ~..(~ . ~~. ~~t~~u!Jf~;¡~ fJrß'; .;:, ~... ~~.'~$~;t -::: .~)~~~ . :~.' ;7-: '': 'if'"'·~~~¡I;r. ,-,~ . ".~:, &~.': ',~ · ~ ~~':i.: ,~¡~~ù;',j c" .¡~ ··7¡:..J~' f".. ,; ,,~~:~ ~!:: '. ~;:~:r.~ 1¡';:':'", ii' ~ /'-!;',T-¿ :~':/ : .,~ ^ .'~~ ·;~":i¡.,.3~~~~. ~i'.:j ·~~~.L~. -;' ~. ..' ~:. .. [~;1 r.. -¡, ~. í..... .... .', ;.;; ~, ..; '~.,it.:. ' ~ ~.~ '.)- -'" .. N ';, .~) :"f1 rp' . if 1.,11· .. . ,(':. \...~ á"., :-111 J'.1f L: I D," ".. ~.. h~ /. . '-':'t{ . ..':;.c.. . ~. ..... ...; ;~.;t. ,r,.{ ....;~~~ .~~_~': '''t .' .., 'UJ I ...,:~'~ ,." '" '-{):.:.n;.:" ':'I'~- . '. tlj'; I ;<'.: (. B ~ .:.~ ' ~'; ~. ~ ;l. ' .' : ~t~,t. ',0\ .~~~ ..;' "":'¿'t,-.' ~",~~..';:'.~ .:ii'.i~.~ ..1~~.~.,~.f~: \ - . 1'.... .~. . ....-... ,f ~.''''',I,· "'\'::... ,.'" :.--~~' ~;.. ~.' -Ef;.~:,"'~i,¿:~*:.:_'~'~*¥::'":''''',::....;,~:,~#'-....~..,.:..~f..-{.~"."..;...~~..'~.~.. " ,~~:, .,; " ~, .:' 2'~>" ' :~{ ~.'~ ,::.~i: .^ ~~. ;.:.~:~. .1,~.:~. "'.~fI. . 'I.., 'f.~~.;' If:).: .~,~. ~< ·è.·" ~ c'.~·: ~'~ '.."'" t..! '..:t. ~ ~~~ ~ .... .:i~ . > ~dð~~r"'r?:\-""~~~'''¡'''''';~'''' ;~." ~': ~ ,~;....,-,.~" ~J:~'''~':: ~.~ ../~~.,.t:~:.~~~;~ ii?~í.,~~~:~ii~~1Ì·:~~~f~ ;:~~~:~~ ~~~~~.:.:;.:t;_:'".,,:,::: ...~.~: .'~- ,~ ~:'~?:~1~~~,t;~; ':;~, ,..:~~~ ~~.." ~._~' ",-.,,~.'."'" .~ ,_"w·.~. ~ "'(~'~ ~~~ I· · ~. ~ì " .' . . 1"~: ~. ....'..-. ~:;~:>~;.;~~~t{~~ n :'. ÌI;t~t'~~~~q~:o~~~~~~i~~i¡E,; ':}~F~~:,~ :·i~~·'í~~ ~~;~: ~ ,:~è:,;...~...,.;;..{.'.~.\~\/:~ - :":ti'::~'~' :::; ., ,~ >~1·¢'-· ~;f 15 .4, """ "" . .,' :'" '.' '. '","."". ..~"'~., . '~,~ ' J'~j l . "'~''¡< : ~l":- ..' ' .' f\ ( . ~'~~'."~ :? .' ~~ ;'~ ~~~ £~ (~ ~ ~~~¡i.:.~_~,.::f~.::¡,.~..~: :', ·:~::t·~<~ ~ .' ~Z: . ;:~ ';::, ./~r. :-:.'~.?:~:~;' ::~:'I ~<,:,7r.·~:1 :.:L ~,~f):';' ';~;\~:: I· ~ . , ;: .".,..... ~ ,. . ..;' .~..;::¿,: .:;~: ~.< :::- ~... - < ~ .,- . <" " :~~:- . ~.",.... -~-:..... ....·":.r;f~ . , " \:?~ 1-···,··'··....,_·':··: ',< ·~~~"~_f~¡·:-~j:,,~.t-J-~~:~_·T'~\~~~~~::··:~~4' .:.~.~,_.,;;, :-~t;:,·(~7,'ff., ~-~ '., '''''. ..:~~<~.«~,~::'> ~. -;....c ~. .~..:-.'~..~'.. .~1~~...~~ t~:~~ ~.~ .. - - -. t"1. . '.. . ~~~ h:·t1w' .;¡ 1.......:.~.~..":.·.·f~.·~··.:~..,.^':,")",~. Y 'J"', ,. .' r.-.< ',' _.. ,-.'!A' '-' . . ' ."' .... -", .. ",t' " ,. <..., .'~. ''¡i ,." · p",-~:, ' . .''''' ..' . ¡;.0-2.;i ~ '¡ c ~o~. i". .: ~::~.~ .~~.'~_1::.. ;:. :. " .,; ,,".. .: .:\j.~.:~:~.. ;:.\.;}i;f.~~j¿.:::_:.'t_(~~,.2: ~'~':,;¡1.:j,(~ ~.c . '. .,~~:~~..:..... ... ~... ~"~'>":<.'~~,....'~~~/!...,'..".~~,';,,~.~''''.';..;~...,~~,:~!:'.~,. ....~_.. .~.~.~ . . ". ".'. - ~ 1· ~ > .~- '." ,.¿~r.t\..~.·,;,~',',~; ',~.,' ~. ~ .: ,', z.-:).: Q ". Q- '.. :.', .'.> -' '; '. , I' ':::.:/. .. ::'::'. ,.... . ; \); ;": ~~~;;:..~~;\~;~~,' ¡: \')~~' '~. ~:~6}.: .~~ 'tic:... ~:, .' '.~, , "', ,.- \.'. ~':~:: I'h '. '~',' :...;;:_~;.':~?:~ ~1 ~. . .' ~. ',' " ." ~. ." ' . ~ " · ..,.... - . " ",. ""~l"'< """ . lD~~"""'" ',. ;f ':.. .. ~ :': .....{ ~ :: ~'~~. '< i ~< ) t~~ C·~. . ~ ;~:j ''f :;-?{ i -:..., , )\. ,,' ~", ~ {"' \": .~'.:. ,,. ~~~ . 'è' "?';J~: '.~~ . ::: (;;~~ ~~~~;} " , '"' .:U ,1 t 'I......' ; '~:..:\ \ ~ . " ,.... - . .. ;' '."'. ;-' ~ : -' ",:C >~'~;.: '?',;:':'Y~~~~l~': l.J:'Z~;:,Út,{.:,>·,:,.. .. .. ~ ~~ ~. ." ~~><~~,,/~:~'~~;'~;J . \ 1/ ,.....< f~~·~;" >.". ~'.; '. \ ~:::. ~', . . .'.. {i~~ f ~'..:..-~ - ~~ '''::J'~··..A t: .. .,..,,,. q". ... I ---.:...~ C .. ' > ~.' It. "'. " ,- ~ )3.. ~ : '-. "y ", i~~ / J ;"?:: .~¡: > ,j ~. .~ ,:i . . . ..' - ,r.-" ""'';'~'.'"'' . D """'" "I.... ...., .,,~.. . -' :\... : ::.. ,. h :..,.- ,-" , .- , ; ~À L . .' .'. fi\ '\¿'.~' '1~', .~J.\~~~.\' .. t ') , ~ ~.):,. - -,.. " ~ <;'. .' .t....""'''i.-.. 4 T ,. . ~ - ,.~.. þ f . ... ~ ;(... ,r¡"" ~#'r." 0111........ . . ). . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Contract With North Texas Commission Council Meeting Date: 6/9/86 Agenda Number: GN 86-50 The North Texas Commission has requested renewal of its contract with the City of North Richland Hills under which it provides promotional activities for the region in general and North Richland Hills in particular. The City has participated in this agreement for many years, and funds for this purpose are budgeted. It is believed that the Commission has been an integral part of the economic progress that this area enjoys, and that the contract should be renewed. The proposed consideration is $2,978.00, which is based on the City's 1985 population estimate of 39,700 as prepared by the Council of Governments. I Recommendation: Authority is requested to renew our contract with the North Texas Commission for a one year period ending April 30, 1987 for the consideration of $2,978. e . --L- Finance Review Acct. Number 15-01-04-4100 ds Available . Finance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I ~ Ie I THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT I I This Contract and Agreement made and entered into on the 1st day of May, A.D., 1986, by and between the City of North Richland Hills acting by and through Rodger Line, its duly authorized City Manager, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and the North Texas Commission acting by and through its duly authorized President, Worth M. Blake, hereinafter referred to as the "Commission", I WIT N E SSE T H: I WHEREAS, the Commission is an independent, non-profit corporation established under the laws of the State of Texas for the purpose of developing and implementing a comprehensive marketing program for the North Texas Region which Region includes Tarrant County and the City of North Richland Hills, Texas; and WHEREAS, the success or failure of the Commission's purposes and objectives has a direct impact upon the health, comfort, safety, peace, good government and welfare of the citizens of the City; and WHEREAS, the City is charged with the responsibility of promoting and preserving the health, comfort, safety, peace, good government and welfare of its citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties do hereby covenant and agree as follows: I I -- I I ARTICLE 1 I The Commission shall commence the services contemplated to be furnished and performed hereunder on the 1st day of May, 1986. ARTICLE 2 I The term of this contract and agreement shall be for a period of one year from the 1st day of May, 1986. I ARTICLE 3 I City of North Richland Hills agrees to pay to the Commission as compen- sation for services rendered hereunder the sum of Two Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy-Eight and 00/100 Dollars ($2,918.00) per annum, payable as follows: In a lump sum, payable before May 1, 1981. -- I ARTICLE 4 1-- The Commission covenants and agrees to: (a) Design, develop and implement a regional marketing/communications campaign that will position the Region, and as such the City, pos- itively in the minds of a carefully selected audience of national I ~ Ie I I and international business and governmental executives. As the marketing program is totally regional in nature, the City's name mayor may not be listed in related marketing literature. How- ever, it is the Commission's policy to make every reasonable effort to publicize the City's name in all literature within the Commission's control. (b) Design, develop and implement a routine, regionally-orien.ted pro- cedure for responding to qualified inquiries. This procedure would provide for, but not be limited to, inclusion of a City developed and produced (Commission approved) response piece. (c) Design, develop and implement a pro-active regional aviation development program targeted toward fostering the continued devel- opment of DFW International Airport and all Metroplex aviation facilities. (d) Make available to citizens and residents of the City such mater- ials, including economic research, as it has and may develop, gather or produce for enhancing the economic health and well-being of the North Texas Region. (e) Develop and implement a marketing/communications strategy to increase the region's, and where appropriate the City's, interna- tional image. (f) Furnish periodic economic-type and comprehensive NTC news-type reports to the City's Chief Administrative Officer with the under- standing that such reports may also be furnished to the local news media for dissemination to the general public. (g) Continue its current successful programs and implement such new and innovative programs as will further its corporate objectives and those in common with the City's interests and activities. (h) Advertise, where appropriate and practical, for the general promo- tional and tourist attraction of City and its vicinity. I I I I I -- I I I ARTICLE 5 I It is covenanted and agreed that the Mayor of the City shall be an ex- officio member of the Board of Directors of the Commission and, as such, is the City's designated representative to vote the city's membership shares at all official elections of the Commission. If the Mayor is unable to serve, his position on the Board will be filled by the City's Manager. I ARTICLE 6 I -- I The Commission agrees to assume and does hereby assume all responsibil- ity and liability for damages sustained by persons or property, whether real or asserted, by or from the carrying on of work or in the performance of services performed and to be performed hereunder. The Commission coven- ants and agrees to, and does hereby indemnify and save harmless the City and all of its officers, agents, and employees from all suits, action or claims of any character brought for or on account of any injuries or !-.... - 2 - I ~ Ie I damages, whether real or asserted, sustained by any person or property by or in consequence of any neglect, omission, act or conduct of Commission, its agents, servants or employees. I ARTICLE 7 I Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 2 above, it is agreed this contract may be cancelled and terminated by either party upon giving thirty (30) days written notice so to cancel or terminate to the other party hereto. The terminal 30 days shall commence upon receipt of such notice by the addressee and shall conclude at midnight on the 30th day thereafter. In the event this contract terminates under the provision of this paragraph either unilaterally or by agreement of the parties, if not otherwise stipu- lated, it is agreed only the pro-rata portion of the terminal monthly installment for service shall be paid on the 1st of such terminal month. Upon payment or tender of such amount, all of the City's obligations here- under shall be discharged and terminated and no action shall lie or accrue for additional benefit, consideration or value for or based upon the ser- vices performed under or pursuant to this agreement. I I I I -- ARTICLE 8 I Commission shall pay all taxes, royalties, and expenses incurred in connection with services under this agreement, except as provided in Article 3 herein. ARTICLE 9 I Commission shall observe and abide by all applicable federal laws, state statutes and the Charter and Ordinances of the City, and all rules and regulations of any lawful regulatory body acting thereunder in connec- tion with the services performed hereunder. I I ARTICLE 10 I No member of or delegate to the Congress of the United States shall be admitted to any share or part of this contract or to any benefit arising therefrom. I ARTICLE 11 Ie I No member, officer or employee of the City or of any local public body, during this tenure or one (1) year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this contract or the proceeds thereof. This prohi- bition is not intended and should not be construed to preclude payment of expenses legitimately incurred by city officials in the conduct of Commis- sion business. !-..- - :3 - I ~ Ie I ARTICLE 12 I Venue of any action brought on or under this agreement shall lie exclu- sively in Tarrant County, Texas. I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be signed by their proper corporate officers as first above specified, and have caused their proper corporate seal to be hereto affixed the day and year first above written. I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I BY: I Rodger Line City Manager ATTEST: I - City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: I I City Attorney NORTH TEXAS COMMISSION I Date -~ ~ I Worth M. Blake President I ATTEST: /) úJLe- cY I Arthur L. Ruff Secretary -- I APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ~ ~ ..... , t~... Hal Thorne General Counsel !--.- - 4 - I' I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: 6/9/86 Council Meeting Date: Subject: Consideration of Street Name Change from Rumfield Road to Starnes Road Ordinance No. 1367 GN-86-51 Agenda Number: I On the approved Thoroughfare Plan of the City of North Richland Hills Starnes Road and Rumfield Road are shown as a continuous Collector Street across the City from Rufe Snow Drive on the west to Precinct Line Road on the east. As development of the adjacent properties proceed and the City, working with the bond funds available, constructs those portions of the street which will not be accomplished by development, the realty of a continuous thoroughfare continues to come closer. To retain two separate street names on this continuous street can lead to a great deal of confusion. The Staff has investigated and found a total of 86 properties currently have Starnes Road addresses and 17 properties have Rumfield Road addresses. On that basis it would seem most logical to change the name of the portion of Rumfield Road which is the extension of the thoroughfare to Starnes Road. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing to allow the property owners to express their opinion on the proposed name change. Letters were sent to all property owners having a Rumfield Road address. Two property owners appeared at the hearing to protest the name change. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the City Council change the street name of Rumfield Road to Starnes Road. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Kt1/~ , City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Paqe 1 of 1 I' Ie I Page 5 P & Z Minutes May 22, 1986 6. PS 86-27 I I I I I I lit I I I I I I -- I I ( ( Consideration of street name change from Rumfield Road to Starnes Road. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Chairman Bowen stated the reason for this change was in the Master Thoroughfare Plan it shows Starnes Road to be a collector street and it intersects with Rumfield Road and it would cause confusion to have two names. He said the Thoroughfare Plan shows the street to go from Rufe Snow Drive all the way to Precinct Line Road. There being no one wishing to speak in favor of this request, the Chairman called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Nancy Fears, 8421 Rumfield Road, came forward. She stated she is opposed to this name change, but is more opposed to it being a main thoroughfare. Mr. Royston stated that from Davis Boulevard to Precinct Line Road would be a four lane road. Ms. Fears stated that this is a major residential area and she has property she would have to get rid of if this road goes through. She said there are more houses on Rumfield Road than on Starnes so why not change Starnes to Rumfield. Mr. Royston stated the City is looking to future development or a bond program to build the road. Mr. Wood asked how many residents were involved. I, ( I Page 6 P & Z Minutes Ie May 22, 1986 I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I ( Mr. Royston stated there are 17 addresses served by city water. Ms. Fears stated that Starnes Road used to not meet Rumfield Road. She said there would have been no way of knowing it would meet Rumfield until recently when they built it out to Davis Boulevard. Ms. Fears said she did not feel it would ever be a major thoroughfare. Chairman Bowen stated that there must be an east-west thoroughfare somewhere in that area. Ms. Fears said she knows there is a need for a road, but not a four lane. Dr. O. G. Tobias, 8800 Rumfield Road, came forward. He said he had lived there for 20 years and he knows we have to have progress. He stated there were only a few houses on Starnes Road until Foster Village was put in. He asked why could it not be changed from Starnes Road to Rumfield Road. Ms. Nash said there are already 87 addresses on Starnes Road and only 17 on Rumfield Road. Dr. Tobias said the city does not have the right-of-way and they don't have a bond issue so why change the name at this time. Mr. Tucker asked how the fire department would know which place on Starnes it would be when it had always been Rumfield Road and why change it now. Mr. Royston stated that there plans for development in the area and Starnes will be developed from Rufe Snow to Davis soon. He said the city is just trying to get ahead of the game. ~ , I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I Page 7 P & Z Minutes May 22, 1986 PS 86-27 APPROVED ADJOURNMENT ( ( Mr. Royston said the fire and police departments would go with the hundred blocks to find the area. Dr. Tobias said he did not know of any development on Rumfield. Mr. Royston said he had several contacts. Dr. Tobias said he feels this is being premature. He said he would not object later when it is needed, but until a bond issue is passed, it probably will not be done. Dr. Tobias said he has 9 acres on one side of Rumfield and 2~ on the other side. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Tucker said he would find it confusing, but he would agree to the change, but the time is the issue. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PS 86-27. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 3-2 with Chairman Bowen and Ms. Nash voting against the change. The meeting adjourned at 8:05 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I -. I I I I I I I fa I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1367 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAME OF A CERTAIN STREET WITHIN THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, COUNTY OF TARRANT, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the name of the following listed street is designated by the Thoroughfare Plan of the City of North Richland Hills to be a continuous Collector Street across the City from Rufe Snow Drive on the west to Precinct Line Road on the east is now and hereby changed to the following listed name: EXISTING NAME - Rumfield Road NEW NAME - Starnes Road SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be and is hereby declared to be cumulative of all other Ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills providing for the rè-naming of streets, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any of such other Ordinances except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions, if any, in such other Ordinances or Ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 3. In any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance, and all of the remainder of this Ordinance not so held to be unconstitutional shall continue to be in full force and effect. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1986. ATTEST: Mayor City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City IJ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Fire Council Meeting Date: 6/9/86 ubject: F;rp npp:}rt-mpnt: Rporganjzation Plan Agenda Number: GN 86-52 I Reference the attached Fire Department reorganization plan which was previously provided to the Council on May 15th prior to our Granbury meeting. Request approval of this reorganization which involves rank changes, job descriptions and improvements in the internal organization of the Fire Department. The reorganization plan abolishes six different job classifications, reducing the number of classifications in the Fire Service from eleven to five positions. The job descriptions and salary ranges were approved by the Civil Service Commission in March 1986. The simplification of job titles and alignment of pay grades simplifies the structure and promotes a more efficient and smoother department. This reorganization also reduces the span of control in the Chief's office. Currently there are 21 personnel reporting directly to the Chief. This plan will reduce this to four. The adoption o~ the reorganization at this time would allow each Division Chief to plan for future expenditures in the upcoming year and allow the Chiefs to familiarize themselves with budgeting procedures and administrative processes in order to give the City a more cost effective department. The cost of implementing the reorganization from July 1, 1986 through September 30, 1986 would be $5,122. Attached for your information is a five-year plan developed by the Fire Department. To the best of our knowledge this is not only the first departmental five-year plan, but it is well conceived and provides a thorough analysis of the Fire Service in the years to come. Recommendation: Approve reorganization of Fire Department. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) OperatingAudget _ Other ( I ¡ - V~A~1éI-?!ðl'§ Department Head Signature Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I ~1i7~ City Manager , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I', Ie I I I I I I I· - I- I I I I I I Ie I I j " '; \ ,.~ ~ a-..i.._ ~---...:._~ ~ ,...:~ :; ,. TO '} INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM Rn~gpr Iin~. Ci~y M~nagpr DATE Fehrt1~ry 6.. }Q86 FRO~I ~~~n Gpr~7, Firp ~h;pf SlTBJECT ppnrg~ni7~tin~ nf Fire Departcent The attached is a proposed reorganization of the Fire Department ~hich should begin by April 1. 1986 and be completed by October 1, 1986. This reorganization ~ill si~plify duty and rank structure ~hile improving all levels of service. I feel these proposed changes ~ill be ~ell received by most personnel and I anticipate little, if any, employee unrest. Furthermore it should provide a boost in morale ~hile improving our overall operations. Your serious consideration will be greatly appreciated. " <.:..~:/..... .':- .. -- s"';"'- . --. .,. .. t ,.. .c .... .. ;' ; ~~~........" .' .L. I" ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I Ie I I· -~.... PROPOSED REORGANIZATION Since 1970 the City and the Fire Department have experienced considerable growth. The number of Fire Department personnel has more than doubled. Yet our fire administrative staff has failed to keep pace with this growth and the increasing demands of this growing City. We currently operate with the same administrative staff as was established in 1976. The goal to attain our own dwelling key rate for lower insurance premiums, the technical asp~cts of training. emergency medical services. state law and "regulations, .city ordinances and the increased request for emergency services have increased the burden of work performed by the department's staff dramatically. The last reorganization of the Fire Department occurred in 1976. It was at this time that a Captain was promoted and placed in charge of the Operations Division. The Prevention Division consisted of the Fire Marshal, who was responsible for inspections and investigations. The Position of Clerk was also added to assist with the increasing record keeping responsibilities. The total number of personnel at that time was 19, answering 547 alarms in 1975 with an annual budget for FY 75-76 of approximately $350,000. In 1985 the number of alarms has increased to 3,040 per year. Of these recorded alarms, fire companies answered 1.928 while the ambulance division answered 1,112. Currently the Fire Department employs 48 personnel (refer to Chart #1) with an annual budget for FY 85-86 of $1,915,878. The same organizational structure that existed in 1976 still exists today (refer to Chart 02) with only a change in title of the Captain to Assistant Chief and the addition of personnel in each division (refer to Chart #3). _w:;~·· This proposed reorganization is vital to assure that a high quality of service is maintained. Since the last reorganization the department has increased several levels of responsibility s~ch as fire inspection. bUilding plan review, arson investigations and emergency ambu~ancë service. These responsibilities all require increased supervision and nUmerous administrative and record keeping tasks. We propose to reorganize the department ~nto four divisions: Fire Operations, Support Services, Fire Prevention and Emergency Medical Services (refer to Chart #4), in an effort to increase the efficiency of departmental functions. This reorganization would require the reclassification of the Assistant Fire Chief and the Fire Marshal and the upgrading of two Lieutenants in April, 1986, to the Position of Division Chief. The Division Chiefs would be under the direction of the Fire Chief.. Reclassification and appointment at this time would allow these new division heads an opportunity to observe a full budget cycle and better prepare them for the task of preparing the FY 87-88 Budget. It would also be necessary to appoint two acting Lieutenants until Octo~er. 1986, at which time we would Use Civil Service Testing Procedures to fill these Positions. , ~~ ... . ., . .. ~A-_p" ~<t~~.-04-h.~~_· :'__~.4.....:i~~,.:., "._......_ I', · Ie 1 I I I I 1 I ~ I 1 I I I I Ie I I Page 2. We al~o propose to streamline the current structure of job classifications within the Fire Department as outlined in the job classification chart (refer to Chart U5). As part of this plan all uniform personnel will be trained as Certified Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT'S). This will assure continuity of service provided by the first responder engine companies and serve to improve services. Under this plan we also propose that all personnel certified at a -higher level of Paramedic be paid- $100 per month to maintain this skill level. .-.. .... - -. -- .. ". # The ambulance service level will be-increased to provide two Paramedics assigned . to the ambulance. This will allow two Paramedics to provide care to the . seriously injured or sick and if necessary a Firefighter/EMT from a engine company would drive the ambulance to the hospital allowing both Paramedics to ~ cont1n.ue. treatment_ ~hi_le. ,enrou~e~<. _ ;;:. .:..' _ ;¡þ& . -.- .' ..... ......,.. -." . .'. -- ~ _., .- ".... ... -. . The present positions of Arson Investigator, Lieutenant/Paramedic and Fire Lieutenant would be reclassified to Lieutenant/EMT and the position of Fire . Inspector and Firefighter/ECA would be upgraded to Firefighter/EMT (refer to- Chart 115). '~~/-'-' /"",' --I' . ..,~ ~",' These changes will insure that all personnel will be equally trained to provide emergency medical care and will simplify personnel matters by providing the flexibility to make transfers to fill the immediate needs of a division. Example: When a Paramedic assigned to the ambulance is off on vacation, it is necessary to make several payroll adjustments for his temporary replacement for proper -pay while serving as the Paramedic. Then upon the return of the regular Paramedic, the above procedure . is reversed._ Another Example: Transferring of available Firefighter/EMT to Fire Prevention in the absence of a Fire Inspector will create time keeping problems as one position is a 24 hour shift and the other is_~ 8 hour shift, not to mention the paper work to Personnel and Finance. This proposal would eliminate involving the Finance and Personnel Departmeats. The work load of the clerk established in 1976 has also increased significantly with the addition of the ambulance service in 1979 came billing requirements. In 1985 ambulance billing accounted for $28,592 in revenue collected. Ambulance billing also requires the filing of Medicare Forms and the preparation of delinquent accounts to be transferred to Chilton Collection Agency. In 1985 there were 266 accounts transferred for collection and 155 accounts required the filing of Medicare Forms in addition to normal billing. The additions of a Fire Inspector and Arson Investigator have further increased the burden of required typing and filing by the present clerk. Due to this increasing work load we feel the necessity of the addition of a secretarial position under the direction of the Fire Chief. The clerk is nearing her maximum capacity which will stop any further expanding of services or the improvements in the existing divisions. , \. '-. " ~'"r.~~jp ~··'~.m:·r~~'-~'~~':_~ ~'!t.;-'~;'~ .,'; ..~.. i. I,' Ie I I I I I I I· -,. I I I · . I I I Ie I I Page 3 The nature of the Fire Chief's work requires that he have a secretary qualified to organize and run an efficient office. The present Clerk would be transferred 'to the Support Services Division to handle all data processing and ambulance billing. These changes and reclassification will greatly improve the efficiency of the Fire Department~ .. .- ....-.: Còst ' --- As with any plan there are costs involved. The reclassification of two -Lieutenants to Division Chiefs in April 1986, according to the Personnel ,Department, would cost $5.201 for April I, 1986 to September 30, 1986. The -appointment of two acting Lieutenants for this same period would be $3.901. This money is presently available in the FY 85-86 Budget. It is also our intent to pay each new Division Chief for his mileage for the six month period until vehicles can be acquired .in FY86-87. Th.is estimat.ion of mileage reflects 100 miles""per week for a 26 week per.iod at a rate of 22¢ per mile, or a total of $1,144. These proposed changes w.ill total $10,246 for the remainder of FY _ '85-86. . -.- .... .... - .. . L.imited space in the " present admin.istration bUilding would require the acquisit.ion of temporary office Space. This can be accomplished with the purchase of a portable bUilding to be located behind the present admin.istration bUilding until completion of the new adm.inistration facilities in 1988. The Fire Department presently has office equipment to furnish this bUilding. The cost of th.is bUilding, according to Purchasing, would be approximately $5,000 (including air-Cond.itioning, phones and electricity). The purchase of the bUilding should be done at this time to provide a progressive working atmosphere for the two Division Chiefs. . - ./ - ~ " ,/ ,. .-",.. The purchas.ing of two vehicles and the hir.ing of a Secretary, the adjustments of salaries for FF/EMT and LT./EMT and the sk.ill level pay for Paramedics w.ill be addressed .in the FY 86-87 BUdget. Total Cost for the .in.itial implementation of this plan .in April, 1986, will be $15,246. This implementation could cause a budget overrun w.ithout add.itional funding and yet these changes need.to be .inst.ituted by April 1, 1986 to insure that the citizens will Continue to receive-prompt and efficient emergency service from this department and .insure that all d.ivisions of the Fire Department stay abreast of an ever changing c.ity. .~ ~. -.- ~ ~.,. ,..-:.~.'".,.~.:.--<,..... :,~...;.I..~-!'...., I, > · . -- I I I I I I I- -- II I I I I I Ie I 1_. _ _'. '. . ~ ~( .. &~.~ "- '. - . -.. f- -Ct: <{ I o ...'.-. .. - . . I I-- -$: o -Ct: U) , C) ex) m .... f-- I Zo W~ 2Y- t- on::- - « D- w o w n:: -- LL o co L[) .~ 10 aJ m .... . . Q) > 0 .- . .., CX) .;~ 0 L. m· ......, ~ CI) I- e: .- E cr" ;5<- ~fd .... -; ~ U) Co r; '" ...!:. m '. "- co yo- ,.... ". -- - ~..~ ... -.. - Q) c: . ,.- c: 0 CI) 1- (1) (l 0 '" ~ m Y- 0 0 0 0 0 0 , U) v ~ C'J .... ,- - , " 13NNOS~3d .:10 ~38r4nN I', · Ie I I I I I I I, --. I I I I I I Ie I I 1976 FIRE DEPARnrEXT ORG~\IZATIOXAL CR~Rr ; . CLER.' I . - - .' .-..a.... STATIO~ 1 @)©@) -.CHART # 2 ~~~.,..- . FIRE CHIEF FIRE ~!.-\ R S H.-\ L FIRE CAPTAI~ ~-~ '" :"'i.;::' . ~ I ~...í . '. . .. - .? -- . " '! ~. - I I. ' Ie I I I I I I 1-:::> ~ .., -;--- I~ t'. I I I I I I Ie I I ~~.- t:J » ~ -u :IJ o n m en H -Z (;) ~~ ~Uj ZH Hn Z::t> ør "'D Ç} en ~ -c .~ :IJ }> rE ~8 CD~ Hn· ffi{B~ H:= >m Fþo H ~t:-iG1 0rg C/)o HZ '2CH nn~ ~(J] ~n m»n (J)ø m -.of (J)r-< . CD C H :Db ~H HZ ~Ci) ç Z ·m ~CD rO offi ~C/)I <ø· m en ~ a d G') :IJ :> -c ~ en ~-< <~ ~~ rn Hl] ziH rnrh ;::~I me ~~, Hm 2~ H I i fg ',- >r -fH Hn o Z . 11- H :IJ m 2 H £H :c ~8 °23 ~(J) cnø ..... ~ ill -ill HH Cù:tJ >m -i H o m 11 H erR ~~ ~~ Hm 2~ H ~ I I ¡ I I ." f!jj:1 em ~cn -i:Þ Hï'1 am z~ H Z en -0" ITlH n:o -fm H a m 1] -- - :c m en m z -i o D G) > Z H N 1> -; H o Z :Þ r n :r: 1> JJ --f "! ~, '-. I Ie" I I I I I I I. t" I I I I I I -- I I .~..¡.~;~~:-:. . -~, ". ,-- ï . . - - ',: , - f t --.. ':.. - ,. . . '" i ã . . c: . · H~ i ~ ~f: ","j :::>cn - ! . :_,. ; I : ~I lb ,i L_c ~' ..... ! t ~ ¡ is J ~!.~ L.. ¡ ~ U· · ~ . ! m~ : lJ~ . , . i I . I I . I I i ¡~ S š Ljt J-en lo~E ,r:::; ~ a L__.. ~""'"...'!..... '.~a.-,-. ..., - ~: -, . ;¡~ i tJ ...... . z '. >-iš : ~~ ~ en _~=.~[_ I i -lH ;. <> , i f u ..... c.IJ ~'"'''!'~L~c~'-=rEs ~ : ~~ ---f . --- li L~~ ! . . , ~ . I . ~ :dJ! ~-- t ;:: - ' CD ..... <..... ði ª~ :; if u... . I 25 ! ~{g ¡. tM! ~ >- i -.~I -;~ I '~ L ... . ~ -=I - ( i if L__~ : ~~ i i! ~- I. · Ie I I I I I I' I ~ I I I I I I -. I I E:B~§~~I êI6I~ê 1 1 1 () 8 1 1 ~ ..;. 4 '~1-:,.~~,,~. ~.:2 6 1 o 1 48 .~r:~~~.~......,¡r,:::-..~ ~ '.>._', .'4 ;. "';.::' _.. ....... .r Elfi~ º~E6Br~~~I EºêIIIº~ Ç~6ßI . :~ ." ';"':.'~ , - ..:_....~- ',. . EºêIIJ_º~ FIRE CHIEF 'ÄSSISTAf··JT CHIEF ..:'........,.. '....:' .. F I F~E MAf:~SHAL DIVISION CHIEF FIRE L I EUTEr.JANT ... ... ...~- -.. LIEUTENANT/PARAMEDIC ARSON INVESTIGATOR F I F:EF I GHTER / EMT FIREFIGHTER/PARAMEDIC FIREFIGHTER/ECA FIRE' I l'JSPECTOR SECRETAf:~Y I I CLER~:~ I! .,..........'f ~_. w .' . c.hòrl ~..s EBQE:QêsQ êIßIS!ª .1 0 0 4 10 --: 0 0 "":P -. ù':' 0 0 () .1 1 48 -~......,;.. , \. .õ-. I Ie I I I I I I I. t' I I I I I I -- I I "'~ ~"""ü:..: DIVISION CHIEF NATURE OF WORK This is administrative and technical work, assisting the Fire Chief with the efficient Control of a division within the fire department. Work involves responsibilitY-for efficient supervision of personnel Within a division. To assist the Fire Chief in planning and supervising the technical operation of the Fire Department. All work is performed under the general direction of the Fire Chief. EXAMPLES OF DttIES May serve as a line or staff officer. depending on the division assigned to, and may be responsible for any of the following: Assumes the Position and responsibility of the Fire Chief in the absence of the Fire Chief. Responds to and takes command of major fires on any shift. Makes recommendations to the Fire Chief regarding departmental policies and procedures. Reviews and analyses work of subordinates to ensure proper performance. Directs and trains assigned personnel. Prepares specifications for vehicles and equipment. Prepares division budget. Assists in preparing department t S budget.. ,. ~ Attends various meetings and conferences. Directs the maintenance, repair, improvement and replacement of firefighting equipment and other properties of the Fire Depart~ent. Perforcs related work as assigned. KXO~~EDGES. SKILLS ~\~ ABILITIES Extensive kno~ledge cf the principles, practices. methods and equipment of modern firefighting. , ~. - Thorough kno~leège of modern principles. practices, techniques. and equiP~ent in cunicipal fire administration. .'\ '~ý''' _:....;~'",,~- . .,,"~~,: '" .... I, Ie' I Page 2 ility to express ideas clearly and concisely. orally and in vriting. Ability to analyze the effectiveness of the department and to correlate its development ~~h changing conditions. I Ability to command the respect of officers and men and to maintain discipline and high morale. I Physical strength and agility and freedom fro~ disabling defects; and abi¡ity to meet such specific physical require~ents as may be established by a competent authority. ~INIKG A1~ EXPERIENCE . I I Five year minimum experience in a supervisorY-POSition plus thirty College credit hours ~n a job ~elated field or an Associate Degree in Fire Protection TeChnology. Business Administration or related field. I LICENSES A1~ CERTIFICATES - I t'f. Must hold a minimum of an intermediate firefighter's Certification from the Texas Commission on Fire Protection Personnel Standards and Education. I I I ...'- -" I I I -- I I ~.- ----... ~. . '1Iiiì:iT~-"-- '-- Po I, Ie I I I I .' . I -.~ ~ I I, ~- I I I I I' I ~ I I ~ FIRE CAPTAIN NATURE OF WORK This is work of a technical nature that involves th~protecting and saving of lives and property. Work in this area involves the supervision of'shift personnel during a tour of duty. Work includes responsibility of the efficient management of fire Scene actiVities, planning and implementing training programs. The Fire Captain is under the èirect Supervision of the Operaticns Division Chief. . EXAMPLES OF WORK PERFORNED . -- --- --~Responds to and takes charge of major fires and emergency incidents that OCcur on shift assigned. Directs in maintenance, repair. improvement and replacement of firefighting _ equipment and other properties of the department. Ensures the completion of all in-service training and exercises as scheduled by the training officer. Plans and directs the operation of their respective shift. including the promulgation of operating rules, the efficient Use of personnel and apparatus, the. procurement of materials and equipment. assist the Division Chief in the preparation of proposed bUdget, and caintenance of adequate records. Perforws related work as assigned. REQUIREMENTS OF WORK Extensive kno~ledge of the principles. practices, methods and equipment of modern firefighting. Thorough knowledge of current literature, recent developments, and sources of information in municipal firefighting. .' . Ability to cO~~and the respect of officers and firefighting personnel and to maintain discipline and high morale. . Physical strer.gth and agility and freedo~ from disabling defects; and ability to ~eet such specific physical requirements as cay be established by a competent autho.rity. DrslRA3LE EXPE~IENCE rlKD TRAINI~G · Must hold the rank of lieutenant in this depart~ent for a period of two (2) years prior to testing. ~st have earr.ed a minimum of twenty (20) college semester hours in fire protection technology, business aè~inistration or related field. '. ~. .. Must hold an Intermediate Firefighters Certification from the Texas CO~~ission on Fire Protection Personnel Standards anè Education. I. Ie I I I I I I I tt:. I I I I I I '- I I ,~!.... "":' FIRE LIEUT~fu'T/E.M.T. -.........' -'.. I.'. _'.. _ .;. NATURE OF t..'ORK This is supervisory firefighting work in cO~~and of an assigned Co~pany. Work involves commanding the personnel, equipment and activities of an assigned company, under the general regulations of the Fire Department and the direction of the Shift Captain. ~ork includes responsibility for the discipline of subordinates and the proper maintenance of apparatus and equip~ent. At afire, a Lieuten~nt/E}1T is responsible for effectively combatting the fire until relieved,of Co~~and by a superior officer. and exercises general supervision over the personnel of his/her co~pany with the responsibility for participating in all firefighting activities. Fire Lieutenant/~'s also conduct drills and instruct their subordinates in firefighting techniques. _ . ::./ /:-. E~'fPLES OF YORK PERFORJ.IED Responds to fire alarms; determines route to be taken by fire companies; directs the work of firefighting personnel pending the àrrival of a superior officer. supervises laying of hose lines. placing ladders. directing water streams, ventilating bUildings. rescuing victims and placing salvage covers. Supervises the cleaning, inspection, and return to proper station of assigned equipment .after a fire. At a station, supervises the cleaning of quarters, equipment and apparatus under his/her control; inspects personnel and maintains discipline; transmits orders .. and information from fire administration. Prepares daily personnel reports. and fire reports regarding alarms; supplies. vehicle maintenance, and other matters pertaining to assigned personnel and equipment. . ~ Makes periodic inspections of the ¿isfrict t5;become familiar wi~h the physical layout of buildings and the location and condition of fire hydrants and streets. Performs related work as assigned. REQUIRE~rE~TS OF ~'¡ORK Considerable knowledge of the geography of the city, including the location of streets, hundred blocks, and fire hydrants. Considerable knowledge of modern firefighting principles. practices and procedures. Considerable knowledge of the operation and caintenance of the various typas of apparatus and equipment used by the Fire Department, and ability to supervise the effective use of equipment and apparatus. t ,-- - - ~ I· ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I -~~4." Page 2 Cpnsiderable knowledge of departmental POlicies, rules and regulations. Knowledge of fire prevention principles and methods and of all applicable legal regulations. Knowledge of recent developments, current literature and sources of information in the field of municipal firefighting. Ability to analyze situations correctly and quickly and to adopt effective courses o£ action with due regard to surrounding hazards and circumstances. " Ability to lead personnel effectively, maintain discipline, and promote company harmony. - . Ability,to train and instruct firefighters in modern firefighting principles, practices and techniques. Ability to keep records and to prepare reports. --, "> Abilitý"to-plan,'àssign, and supervise the work of subordinates. both under emergency conditions at the scene öf a fire, and in routine work. Skill in the use of firefighting equipment and apparatus. Physical strength and agility and freedom from disabling defects; and ability to meet such physical requirements as may be established by a competent authority. DESIRABLE EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING A minimum time of two (2) years spent as a Firefighter with this department. Must have a current E.M.r. Certification from the Texas State Department of Health, and this certification must be maintained while serving at this rank. at ~- .- .. I Ie I I I I I I I. tþ. I I I I I I ~ I I FIREFIGHTER/EMERGENCY ~ŒDICAL TECHXICI&~ NATURE OF WORK Thi~ is technical work in protecting and saving life and property fro~ fire. Work involves responsibility for preventing and cocbatting fires and providing emergency liJe~saving services. An employee of this class shall be assigned to operate the ambulance service, employing special skills learned on the job. Duties involve hazardous tasks under such handicaps as smoke and cramped . surroundings. Substantial time is Spent receiving instruction and 1n.perforc1ng and repair of property and equipment. Work is normally perforced under close supervision or. within ~n established routine. Assignments are given by a sup~rior officer who reviews perforcance_ through observation. discussions and reports. EXAMPLES OF WORK PERFORMED .-/ ..'-. Responds to fire alarm; lays and connects hose; holds nozzles and directs Water stream; raises and climbs ladders; Uses chemical extinguishers, bars. hooks, lines and other equipment; directs firefighting operations pending arrival of a Superior officer. Perforcs salvage operations such as throwing salvage covers, sWeeping water. and remoVing debris. Removes persons from danger; administers first aid to fire Victics, injured persons. or emergency medical cases. Participates in fire drills and attends classes in firefighting, hydraulics and related subjects. Participates in "in-servicelt inspections of public and business buildings in his area. observing the layout of the bUilding, the exits and any othßr features or conditions which would be helpful to krto~ in êase of fire or emergency; conducts inspections of private residences on request; reports any unuSual or hazardous conditions which he may observe during inspection. Drives and operates pumper or ladder truck; operates pumping engine so that water pressure at the nozzle is maintained for the most effective Operation. and drives ambulance or attends to the injured or sick. Does general maintenance work in the upkeep of fire properties ar.d equipreent; washes. waxes. and paints ~alls and floors; makes minor repairs; washes, hangs. and dries hose; washes. cleans, POlishes. and cleans apparatus; per=or~s preventive maintenance on automotive equipment. Prepares required reports. , \..-- Perfo~s related work as assigned. .. :~.-.~-~ -. ---:... - . . . I --. I I I I I I I. ~_. I I I I I I l- I I ,~ Page Two REQUIREMENTS OF WORK Knowledge of the street system and the physical layout of the City and adjoining areas and ability to .~cquire such knowledge. Knowledge of first aid principles and skill in their application and current certificate as an Emergency Medical Technician. Ability to understand and follow oral and written instructions under emergency conditions. Ability to unqerstand and follow oral and written instructions under emergency conditions. _.. -... - ..- Ability to develop skill in fire fighting and in the use of fire fighting equipment within a reasonable working test period. /' -..... Ability to dö arduous work under cramped and difficul~ circumstances. Physical strength and agility and freedom from disabling defects; and ability to meet such specific physical requirements as may be establishëd by competent authority. DESIRABLE EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING Any combination of experience and training equivalent to graduation from a senior high school. NECESSARY SPECIAL REQUIREMENT Must be the hOlder of a Basic Certificate issued through the Texas Commission on Fire Protection Personnel Standards and Education, and must be the hOlder of a current Emergency Medical Technician Certificate one year from appointment to this Position. 1'- ;.."";" SPECIAL NOTE: Personnel in this classification are eligible to hold a Paramedic Certification given by the Texas Department of Health. Paramedic Certification is considered an additional skill of the Firefighter/E.M.T.'s job description. 't ~. ..' ·It I Ie I I I I I I I', ... r· I I I I I I l- I I ~~."a..:.. 011 CLERK II ,- NATURE OF t'lORK.. . . This is responsible clerical work involving moderately . complex work methods and problems. . Work involves performing a variety of clerical functions requiring the application of independent jUdgment and the interpretation of POlicies and regulations. The type of work differ~ among Positions, but where work is more repetitive there is added -responsibility for finality of action. ~rk may involve the operatic of typewriters, adding machines, or other office equipment.. Work.". .. is generally reviewed by superiors through observation of operations, and advice and assistance are normally available when unusual.or difficult matters arise. EXAMPLES OF WORK PERFO~1ED Maintains, with relative independence, an Overall clerical process or office activity. -- .---.:,:-.. .. Receives, Codes, indexes, and files reports and related records; maintains statistical records; prepares reports. Types and files forms, letters, memoranda, mailing lists, index cards, and other materials. Performs related work as assigned. REQUIREl-IENTS OF WORK CO:lsiderable knowledge of business English,-_ spelling and cor.unercial ari th:netic. -c." Knowledge of modern office practices~'procedures, and appliances· . Ability ·to understand and.carry out mOderately complex verbal and written instructions. Ability to make minor decisions in accordance with established procedures. . .- . . Ability to make arithmetic computa~ions accurately and with reasonable speed. Ability to deal tactfully with other employees and the public. et ~ .__. I II' I I I I I I I ,- I I I I I I '- I I ~:.. 034 SECRETARY II NATURE OF WORK ThIs is highly responsible secretarial work involving the performance of delegated administrative details. Work involves responsibility of providing secretarial services to a Depart~ent Head, and performing important administrative details. An e~ployee of this class is required to exercise considerable initiative. independent judgement. and discretion in screening calls, visitors and ~ail; answering and disposing of requests for info~ation; and in general public relations activities. New assignments and changes in policies and procedures are received in general outline, and incumbents are expected to proceed with minimum supervision; however. advice and assistance are normally available. Work is reviewed for the achievement of desired results and adherence to established policies and procedures. ~ - EXAMPLES OF WORK PERFOR'1ED Performs a variety of office administrative tasks in relieving an administrative official of important details. Establishes and maintains complex filing systems; plans and maintains an adequate inventory of office material and supplies; relays complex and important instructions and messages. Maintains appointment schedules; Screens and refers callers; provides detailed respònses to information requests about programs and activities; makes travel arrangements; makes and confirms appointments. Prepares correspondence in accordance with established policies and procedures; types a variety of materials, including administrative and public reports for reproduction and distribution; prepares complex work sheets and tables; and complies and prepares required reports on federal grants~ ~ . Performs related ~ork ~s assigned. REQUIRDfE;\TS OF WORK Thorough knowledge of secretarial practices and procedures. Thorough knowledge of business English, spelling and arithmetic. Thorough knowledge of modern office practices. procedures and equipment. Considerable knowledge of general municipal agency operations and organization. t \ Ability to ~ake responsible decisions in accordance with established Policies and procedures. I --. I I I I I I II i It; I I I I I I l- I I ......ri:ì]t;. ~: - '- 034 Ability to maintain administrative, fiscal and general records, and to prepare reports and answer questions from records. Ability to compose correspondence on complex matters and to perform complex office management details without assistance. Ability to maintain effective working relationships with other employees, state officials and the public, and to deal with public relations problems cOu~teously and tactfully. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIO~S - ·-0 "·_:Graduëition from a senior high -school or possess GED certificate. :Minimum (2) years of municipal seCretarial or clerical experience. Ability to type 60 wpm (corrected) and,to take and transcribe oral dictation at a rate of 80 wpm' (corrected) . _ . . K:11v/~: Rodger N. Line, City Manager . . ..--f .. APPROVED: DATE CJ ':J.~ -rS . . - . e· CITY OF NORTH RICH~\~ HILLS 4/85 t ,. - "'=:'!"""" CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Adrnjnj!;tJ;:'atiotJ _ Council Meeting Date: 6/9/86 ubject: Splel"f"ion of Ar~hit-ect for Fire DepaJ::tment; Agenda Number: GN 86-53 Construction Projects The CIP schedule provides for construction of the Watauga Road Fire Station 04 in January 1987. The other Fire Department construction projects are staggered with the final project (relocation of Fire Station #2) scheduled for January 1989. Future consideration of bond sales may call for accelerating this schedule if possible. Dennis Horvath and Chief Gertz reviewed the qualifications of 30 architectural firms who submitted information and who expressed a desire to work with the City on these projects. Using rating factors such as proximity, availability, comparable prior experience, unique competency, and reputation, Chief Gertz and I recommended seven firms that we felt were qualified and should be interviewed for this contract. Councilman Harold Newman, Dennis Horvath and Chief Gertz interviewed the seven firms on April 22, 1986. On May 13, 1986 the final three selected firms were interviewed a second time. It is the consensus of the committee that we retain the firm of Phillip Swager and Associates (PSA) to work with the City to complete these projects. Recommendation: Award Architectural Service Contract to PSA. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other [)~¡~ Department Head Signature Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ,K '/1 oŽ~ City Manager , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I' ~. I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I- f' I . 4 . ~ THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS r~F~ì~ ~,. ':~Ij~~'.,' Þ s):rWd ..~~~~ 't ~ . "'~:} -"'- .\."~ ~ AlA Document 8141 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect 1977 EDITION THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED ~VITH RESPECT TO ITS CO/\1PLETION OR MODIFICATION AGREEMENT made as of the Ninth Hundred and Eighty-Six -in the year of Nineteen day of June BETWEEN the Owner: City of North Richland Hills North Richland Hills, Texas and the Architect: Phillips Swager Associates Inc. Dallas? Texas For the following Project: (Include detailed description of Project location and scope.) New construction of Fire Station with Administration and Training Facilities to be located at Watauga Road; North Richland Hills, Texas. The Owner and the Architect agree as set fort.h below. Copyright 1'117, 1926, 19~R, 19«;1, 1953, 1(1)8, 1961, 1963, 1C)66, 1'167, 1C)70. 1(J7 -L ;:.~ 1977 by The American Inc;(ltutc of Architects, 1735 New York Avenu~, N,W.. Wa!'hingron. D.C. 20006. Rt'JHoducllon 0; the matenal herein or substantial quol.ltion 0; ils provIsions without pl'rmissIC>n ot Ihe AlA violJte\ the copynghl laws of Ihe United Stales and will he !'Uhjl'ct to legal proseculion. AlA DOCUMENT 8141 · O\VNER-ARCHITEC f ACREEMf.N f · THIR fEENTIt EDITION · JULY 19ïì · AlA'" . CD l'1ìì lHE AMERICA~ INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1ìJ5 Nf.W YORK AVENUE, N.\V., \VASHINGTON, ù.C. 20006 8141-1977 1 I' Ie 1 I I I I I I -- I 1 I 1 I I l- f' I TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT ARTICLE 1 ARCHITECT'S SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES BASIC SERVICES The Architect's Basic Services consist of the five phases described in Paragraphs 1.1 through 1.5 and include normal structural, mechanical and electrical engineering services and aIJY' other services included in Article 15 as part of Basic Services. 1.1 SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE 1.1.1 The Architect shall review the program furnished by the Owner to ascertain the requirements of the Project and shall review the understand.ing of such requirements with the Owner. (see A rt Ie 1 e 15. 2. 1 ) 1.1.2 The Architect shall provide a. preliminary evalua- tion of the program and the Project budget requirements, each in terms of the other, subject to the limitations set forth in Subparagraph 3.2.1. 1.1.3 Thc Architect shall review with the Owner alterna- tive approaches to design and construction of the Project. 1.1.4 Based on the mutually agreed upon program and Project budget requirements, the Architect shall prepare, for approval by the Owner, Schematic Design Documents consisting of drawings and other documents illustrating the scale and relationship of Project components. 1.1.5 The Architect shall submit to the Owner a State- ment of Probable Construction Cost based on current area, volume or other unit costs. 1.2 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1.2.1 ßased on the approved Schematic Design Docu- ments and any adjustments authorized by the Owner in the program or Project budget, the Architect shall pre- pare, for approval by thc Owner, Design Devefopment Documents consisting of drawings and other documents to fix and describe the size and character of the entire Project as to architectural, structural, mechanical and elec- trical systems, materiafs and such other elements as may be appropriate. 1.2.2 The Architect shall submit to the Owner a further Statement of Probabfe Construction Cost. 1.3 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE 1.3.1 Based on the approved Design Development Doc- uments and any further adjustments in the scope or qual- ity of the Project or in the Project budget authorized by the O\vner, the Architect shall prepare, for approval by the Owncr, Construction Documents con5isting of Draw- ings and Specifications setting forth in detail the require- 11lents for the construction of the Project. 1.3.2 The Architect shall assist the Owner in the prepara- tion of the necessary bidding information, bidding forms, the Conditions of the Contract, and the form of Agree- ment between the Owner and the Contractor. 1.3.3 The Architect shall advise the Owner of any adjust- ments to previous Statements of Probable Construction Cost indicated by changes in requirements or general market conditions. 1.3.4 The Architect shall assist the Owner in connection with the Owner's responsibility for filing documents re- quired for the approval of governmental authorities hav-' ing jurisdiction over the Project. 1.4 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATION PHASE 1.4.1 The Architect, following the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents and of the latcst Statement of Probable Construction Cost, shall assist the Owner in obtaining bids or negotiated proposals, and assist in awarding and preparing contracts for construction. 1.5 CONSTRUCTION PHASE-ADMINISTRATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 1.5.1 The Construction Phase wi II com mence wi th the a\vard of the Contract for Construction and, together with the Archi tect's obligation to provide ßasic Services under this Agreement, will terminate when final payment to the Contractor is due, or in the absence of a final Certificate for Payment or of such due date, sixty days after the Date of Substantiaf Completion of the Work, whichever occurs fi rs t. 1.5.2 Unfess otherwise provided in this Agreement and incorporated in the Contract Dücuments, the Architect shall provide administration of the Contract for Construc- tion as set forth below and in the edition of AlA Docu- ment A201, General Conditions of the Contract for Con- struction, current as of the date of this Agreement. 1.5.3 The Architect shall be tl representative of the Owncr during the Construction Phase, and shalf advise and consult with the Owner. Instructions to the Contrac- tor shall be forwarded through the Architect. The Archi- te~t shall have authority to act on behalf of the Owner only to the extent provided in the Contract Documents unless otherwise modified by written instrument in ac- cordance with Subparagraph 1.5.16. 1.5.4 The Archi teet shall visi t the si te a t in tervals ap- propriate to the stage of construction or as othenvise agreed by the Architect in writing to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the Work an.d to determine in general if the Work is proceeding in accord- ance with the Contract Documents. However, .the Archi- tect shall not be required to make exhaustive or con- tinuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quan- tity of the Work. On the basis of such on-site observa- tions as an ()rchitect, the Architect sh;dl keep the Owner informed of the progress and quality of thc Work, and shall endeavor to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work of the Contractor. 1.5.5 The Architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and progr()ms in connection with the Work, for the acts or omissions of the Contr,lctor, Sub- AlA DOCUMENT 8141 · O\VNER-ARCHITECT AGREEMENT · THIRTEENTH EDITION . JULY 19ì7 . AIA~ . © 1977 TH( A \1ERICAN INSTITUTE or ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.\V., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 8141-1977 3 I ~. I 1.7.1 Providing analyses of the Owner's needs, and pro- gramming thEf requi reme 1ts of th~ Plojeçt. .\ see Art I C 1 e 1 . L. I ) 1.7.2 ProvidIng financial feasi ility or other special stud ies. 1.7.3 Providing planning surveys, site evaluations, envi- ronmental studies or comparative studies of prospective sites, and preparing special surveys, studies and submis- sions required for approvals of governmental authorities or others having jurisdiction over the Project. 1.7.4 Providing services relative to future facilities, sys- tems and equipment which are not intended to be con- structed during the Constructio~ Phase. 1.7.5 Providing services to investigate existing conditions or facilities or to make measured drawings thereof, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information fur- nished by the Owner. 1.7.6 Preparing documents of alternate, separate or· sequential bids or providing extra services in connection with bidding, negotiation or construction prior to the completion of the Construction Documents Phase, when requested by the Owner. 1.7.7 Providing coordination of Work performed by separate contractors or by the Owner's own forces. 1.7.8 Providing services in connection with the work of a construction manager or separate consultants retained by the Owner. 1.7.9 PrQviding Detailed Estimates of Construction Cost, analyses of owning and operating costs, or detailed quan- tity surveys or inventories of material, equipment and labor. 1.7.10 Providing interior· design and other similar ser- vices required for or in connection with the selection, procurement or installation of furniture, furnishings and related equipment. 1.7.11 Providing services for planning tenant or rental spaces. 1.7.12 .Making revisions in Drawings, Specifications or other documents when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given, are requi red by the enactment or revision of codes, laws or regulations subsequent to the preparation of such doc- uments or are due to other causes not solely within the control of the Architect. 1.7.13 Preparing Drawings, Specifications and supporting data and providing other services in connection with Change Orders to the extent that the adjustment in the Basic Compensation resulting from the adjusted Con- struction Cost is not commensurate with the services re- quired of the Architect, provided such Change Orders are required by causes not solely within the control of the Architect. 1.7.14 Making investigations, surveys, valuations, inven- tories or detailed appraisals of existing facilities, and serv- ices required in connection with construction performed by the Owner. 1.7.15 Providing consultation concerning replacement of any Work damaged by fire or other cause during con- I I I I I I lilt I I I I I I I f' struction, and furnishing services as may be required in connection wi th the .replacement of such Work. 1.7.16 Providing services made necessary by the default of the Contractor, or by major defects or deficiencies in the Work of the Contractor, or by failure of performance of either the Owner or Contractor under the Contract for Construction. . 1.7.17 Preparing a set of reproducible record drawings show.ing significant changes in the Work made during construction based on marked-up prints, drawings and other data turnished by the Contracto, to the Architect. 1 7 8 P s. e eAr tlt.1 e 1 5 · 2 · 2 J. h . I .. f · .1 rovldlng extenSive assIstance In t e utI Izatlon 0 any equipment or system such as initial start-up or testing, adjusting and balancing, preparation of ope~ation. and maintenance manuals, training personnel for operation and maintenance, and consultation during operation. 1.7.19 Providing services after issuance to the Owner of the final Certificate for Payment, or in the absence of a final Certificate for Payment, more than sixty days after the Date of Substantial Completion of the Work. 1.7.20 Preparing to serve Or serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration pro- ceeding or legal proceeding. . 1.7.21 Providi ng services of consultants for other than the normal architectural, structural, mechanical and elec- trical engineering services for the Project. 1.7.22 Providing any other services; not otherwise in- cluded in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in accordance with generally accepted architectural practice. 1.8 TIME 1.8.1 The Architect shall perform Basic and Additional Services as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of thé Work. Upon request of the Owner, the Architect shall submit for the Owner's approval a schedule for the performance of the Architect's services which shall be adjusted as required as the Project proceeds, and shall include allowances for peri- ods of time required for the Owner's' review and approval of submissions and for approvals of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. This schedule, when approve.d by the Owner, shal I not, except for reasonable cause, be exceeded by the Architect. ARTICLE 2 THE OWNER'S RESPONSIBiliTIES 2.1 The Owner shalf provide full information regarding requirements for th'e Project including a program, which shall set forth the Owner's design objectives, constraints and criteria, including space requirements and relation- ships, ffexibility and expandability, special equipment and systems and site requirements. (see Art i c 1 e 1 5.2. 1 ) 2.2 If the Owner provides a budget for the Project it shall include contingencies for bidding, changes in the Work during construction, and other costs which are the responsibility of the Owner, including those described in this Article 2 and in Subparagraph 3.1.2. The Owner shall, at the request of the Architect, provide a statement of funds available for the Project, and their source. AlA DOCUMENT 8141 · OWNER-ARCHITECT AGREEMENT · THIRTEENTH EDITION . JULY 1977 . A A~ . © 1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 I 8141-1977 5 I' , ~. I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I i' I with the fixed limit. The providing of such service shall be the limit of the Architect's responsibility arising from the establishment of such fixed limit, and having done so, the Architect shall be entitled to compensation for all services performed, in accordance with this Agreement, whether or not the Construction Phase is commenced. ARTICLE 4 DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE 4.1 Direct Personnel Expense is defined as the direct sal- aries of all the Architect's personnel engaged on the Proj- ec t, J n d the po r t ion 0 f th e cos t .0 f the i r man d at 0 ry and customary contributions and benefits related thereto, such as employment taxes and other statutory employee bene- fits, insurance, sick leave, holidays, vacations, pensions and similar contributions and benefits. ARTICLE 5 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 5.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to the Com- pensation for Basic and Additional Services and include actual expenditures made by the Architect and the Archi- tect's employees and consultants in the interest of the Project for the expenses listed in the following Sub- paragraphs: $ .21 1m i 1 e fa r au to 5.1.1 Expense of transportation in connection with the Project; ~~~rnx~ti.ð~~m<~~ð"~ ~k long distance communications; and fees paid for securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. 5.1.2 Expense of reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings, Specifications and other documents, excluding reproductions for the office use of the Architect and the Architect's consultants. 5.1.3 Expense of data processing and photogr.lphic pro- duction techniques when used in connection with Addi- tional Services. 5.1.4 If authorized in advance by the Owner, expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates. 5.1.5 Expense of renderings, models and mock-ups re- quested by the Owner. 5.1.6 Expense of any additional insurance coverage or . limits, including professional liability insurance, requested by the Owner in excess of that normally carried by the Architect and the Architect's consultants. ARTICLE 6 PAYMENTS TO THE ARCHITECT 6.1 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF BASIC SERVICES 6.1.1 An initial payment as set forth in Paragraph 14.1 is the minimum payment under this Agreement. 6.1.2 Subsequent payments for Basic Services shall be made monthly and shall be in proportion to services per- formed within each Phase of services, on the basis set forth in Article 14. 6.1.3 If and to the extent that the Contract Time initially established in the Contract for Construction is exceeded or extended through no fault of the Architect, compensa- tion tor any Basic Services required for such extended period of Administration of the Construction Contract shall be computed as set forth in Paragraph 14.4 for Addi- tional Services. 6.1.4 When compensa tion is based on a percentage of Construction Cost, and any portions of the Project are deleted or otherwise not constructed, compensation for such portions of the Project shall be payable to the extent services are performed on such portions, in accordance with the schedule set forth in Subparagraph 14.2.2, based on (1) the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated proposal or, (2) if no such bid or proposal is received, the most recent Statement of Probable Construction Cost or Detailed Esti- mate of Construction Cost for such portions of the Project. 6.2 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES 6.2.1 Payments on account of the Architect's Additional Services as defined in Paragraph 1.7 and for Reimbursable Expenses as defined in Article 5 shall be made monthly upon presentation of the Architect's statement of services rendered or expenses incurred. 6.3 PAYMENTS WITHHELD 6.3.1 No deductions shall be made from the Architect's compensation on account of penalty, liquidated damages or other sums withheld from payments to contractors, or on account of the cost of changes in the Work other than those for which ,the Architect is held legally liable. 6.4 PROJECT SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION 6.4.1 I f the Project is suspended or abandoned in whole or in part for .more than three months, the Architect shall be compensated for all services performed prior to receipt of written notice from the Owner of such suspension or abandonment, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due.~)@(IxTe<m(oot~~~~5<xxøt~xiJQ~aph< 1~ I f the Project is resumed after being suspended for more than three months, the Architect's compensation shall be equitably adjusted. ARTICLE 7 ARCHITECT'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS 7.1 Records of Reimbursable Expenses and expenses per- taining to Additional Services and services performed on the basis of a Multiple of Direct Personnel Expense shall be kept on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles and shall be available to the O\vner or the Owner's authorized representative at mutually convenient times. ARTICLE 8 OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS 8.1 Drawings and Specifications as instruments of serv- ice are and shall remain the property of the Architect whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not. The Owner shall be permitted to retain copies, in- cluding reproducible copies, of Drawings and Specifica- tions for information and reference in connection with the Owner's use and occupancy of the Project. The Drawings and Specifications shall not be used by the Owner on AlA DOCUMENT 8141 . OWNER-ARCHITECT AGREEMENT · THIRTEENTH EDITION · JULY 1977 · AIA~ . © 1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 8141-1977 7 I" ~. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I {' I . ~ ¡ ARTICLE 14 BASIS OF COMPENSATION The Owner shall compensate the Architect for the Scope of Services provided, in accordance with Article 6, Payments to the Architect, and the other Terms and Conditions of this Agreement, as follows: 14.1 AN INITIAL PAYMENT of None dollars ($ -:-0- shall be made upon execution of this Agreement and credited to the Owner's account as follows: 14.2 BASIC COMPENSATION 14.2.1 FOR BASIC SERVICES, as described in Paragraphs 1.1 through 1.5, and any other services included in Article 15 as part of Basic Services, Basic Compensation shall be computed as follows: (Here insert basis of compensation, including fixed amounts, multiples or percentages, and identity Phases to which particular methods of compensa- tion apply, if necessary.) Compensation shall be the stipulated sum amount of $93,719.00. 14.2.2 Where compensation is based on a Stipulated Sum or Percentage of Construction Cost, payments for Basic Services shall be made as provided in Subparagraph 6.1.2, so that Basic Compensation for each Phase shall equal the following percentages of the total Basic Compensation payable: (Include any additional Phases as appropriate.) Schematic Design Phase: Design Development Phase: Construction Documents Phase: Bidding or Negotiation Phase: Construction Phase: Fifteen Twenty Forty Five Twenty percent ( 1 5 0/0) percent (20 0/0) percent (40 0/0) percent ( 5 0/0) percent (20 0/0) 14.3 FOR PROJECT REPRESENTATION BEYOND BASIC SERVICES, as described in Paragraph 1.6, Compensation shall be computed separately in accordance with Subparagraph 1.6.2. AlA DOCUMENT 8141 . OWNER-ARCHITECT AGREEMENT · THIRTEENTH EDITION · JULY 1977 · AIA~ · © 1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 8141-1977 9 I' ~. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I ARTICLE 15 OTHER CONDITIONS OR SERVICES 15.1 Notwithstanding Article 1.7, the following services will be provided by the Architect and his consultants as part of Basic Services. 15.1.1 Architect shall make one (1) site visit per week during the Construction Phase with a maximum of forty (40) visits. 15.1.2 Civil Eng;neering Consultant and Mechanical/Electrical Consultant shall make a maximum of three (3) site visits each during the Construction Phase. 15.2 The following Additional Services shall be provided by the Architect and his consultants at the following lump sum costs: 15.2.1 Assistance to the Owner in Programming - $1,136.00. 15.2.2 Record Drawings (As-builts) produced from information provided by the General Contractor - $395.00. 15.2.3 ·Additional site visits by the Architect or his consultants if requested .by the Owner - $500.00 per visit. 15.3 Notwithstanding Article 5, Reimbursable Expenses include the following: 15.3.1 Reimbursable Expenses for automobile mileage and telephone communications by the Architect and his consultants shall be billed at a multiplier of one (1.0) with a maximum Reimbursable Expense for these items to be $1 ~OOO.OO. 15.3.1 The Architect shall provide a topographic survey as a Reimbursable Expense for the stipulated sum of $1,700.00. 15.3.2 The Architect shall provide a soils report as a Reimbursable Expense for the stipulated sum of $5,300.00. AlA DOCUMENT 8141 . OWNER-ARCHITECT AGREEMENT · THIRTEENTH EDITION · JULY 1977 · A'A~ · @ 1977 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS. 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 8141-1977 11 I ..;..~ .' < ..J CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Department: Munici:eal Court -SUbject: . Appointment of Deputy Clerk Resolution No. 86-24 Counci I Meeti ng Date: 6/09 / 86 -·Agenda Number: 86-54 Request is being made to appoint Patricia Posey as a Deputy Clerk. Court Clerk Bobbie McCorkle is now Alternate Judge and can no longer sign as Affiant on complaints. With the absense of Deputy Clerk Linda Woodward, either by sickness or vacation, it is necessary to have another Deputy Clerk who may sign complaints and give oaths on citizen complaints. The attached resolution approves her appointment. Recommendation: Approve resolution approving the appointment of Patricia Posey as Deputy Clerk. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Budget _ _ Oth~ ~., '-~1/? /)/~/.' . . '. · ;q--~k¿;ä/////~d~/ 1l~~ Department Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acet. Number N/A Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director Paae 1 of__~_ ~ I iR.eøølutiøn I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ '6 ¡ ., No. 86-24 (ttity of Nort4 1&ir4lanà Bills BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: 1. The appointment of Patricia Posey as Deputy Clerk of the Municipal Court of this city be, and is hereby approved. PASSED AND APPROVED this 9th day of June, 1986 by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Council Meeting Date: 6/9/86 ubject: Proposed Support Services Department Agenda Number: GN 86-55 ~ As we are beginning our budget preparation for FY 86-87, we request Council approval of a new Support Services Fund. Such a department would be contained in a separate fund, defined by Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP) as a proprietary fund known as an Internal Service Fund. The purpose of this fund is to account for the financing of goods or services provided by one department or agency of a government to other departments on a cost-reimbursement basis. Accounting for Internal Service Funds is designed to accumulate the total cost, including depreciation and overhead, of providing a particular service. These funds are reimbursed for these costs by the departments receiving the goods or services. Consequently these reimbursements are treated as operating revenues of the Internal Service Fund, and as current operati~g expenses of the reimbursing fund. ~ The Internal Service Fund should recoup the total cost of such services. They are not ~ designed to produce any significant profit in the long run. The amount and type of charges to the various departments to effect this result can and should be done based on historical information and experience. The firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. has proposed to the City to provide a study of such an Internal Service Fund to: A. Establish the scope and objectives of the fund B. Determine inventory and cost of vehicles and equipment to be included in the fleet c. Develop vehicle and equipment replacement policies D. Project operating and capital cost of the fund by year for the next three years E. Establish policies and procedures for operation of the fund F. Incorporate estimated fees and funding requirements in fiscal year 1987 budget and G. Establish accounting entries and coding structure to match the budget process. The cost to the City of this study would be $9,500. Peat, Marwick has accomplished such studies for other municipalities, for example Hurst, Texas, Shreveport, La. and Boulder, Colorado. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other x ~ {Yj~ .w Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number see page 3 S~d~e_~~ - ~/;7~ I City Manager , Finance Director Page 1 of 3 I I Our need for the development of such a fund can be seen in the substantial growth in population and city services within the past five years. Following are jus.t a few examples of this growth: I 1980 1986 I City Population: City Employees: Police Department Personnel: Overall City Budget: (Millions) Total Equipment Inventory: 29,000 187 51 8.3 65 40,000 263 72 17.3 150 I I Our internal growth is service and in particular the number and types of various vehicles and equipment have grown to the point where a single manager of equipment services is needed. In addition we now have approximately 25,000 square feet under janitorial contract (City Hall, Recreation Center, Police Department). Beginning next year with the addition of Public Works Center (Admin. area), Animal Control Shelter (Admin. area), Library and Recreation Center we will have approximately 166,046 square feet. We believe that is will be more cost effective to have our own janitorial personnel rather than contract this work. We intend to place equipment management, service garage, building maintenance, and various other support activities in one Department. The three major divisions realigned under Support Services are Purchasing, Fleet Management and Facilities Management. The full budget impact of this move is not known as we are just beginning our budget preparation for FY 1986-87. However with the following estimated completion dates on our additional public building we are requesting approval of the concept at this time to allow an orderly budget process. I I I I Police Station'- August 1987 Library - January 1987 Recreation Center - January 1987 Public Works Service Center - November 1986 Animal Control Shelter - November 1986 Departmental Divisions I PURCHASING - A purchasing division was set up four years ago and has undoubtedly saved several thousands of dollars in large as well as small purchases. It is Purchasing's function and responsibility to see that all purchases for the City are accomplished in accordance with State law, City Charter, Council requirement, and budgetary limitations and to ensu~e that all items are purchased at a fair and reasonable price and delivered to the City enabling the various departments to perform their required functions. The - present purchasing budget is approximately $268,000. We do anticipate some increases in next year's proposed budget. However, any increases in staffing will be considered in the Peat, Marwick, Mitchell study and any recommended increases will be reviewed during th~ normal budget cycle. I I I FACILITIES MAINTENANCE - At the present time there is no specific individual or department responsible for ensuring that the public building in the City of North Richland Hills are properly maintained, i.e. heating, Alc, electrical needs, roofing, janitorial service, etc. For example the Purchasing Department is responsible for contracts associated with janitorial, heating, AC, etc. The Parks Department maintains the grounds and certain other routine maintenance items are left to the various Department Heads. With the addition of the Animal Control Shelter, Public Works Garage, Community Center, Library, Fire Station 1, Police Department (all to be completed within the next 9 months) it would be advantageous from a financial standpoint to have all public buildings under one manager to ensure proper care and maintenance. Our present building maintenance budget is $139,000. Just the addition of the Community Center and Library will increase that figure by approximately $250,000. A cost estimate for the remainder of the additional buildings has not yet been estimated. I I I CITY OF NORTHRICHLAND HILLS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FLEET MANAGEMENT'- Due to the City's rapid growth, it is apparent that all vehicles should be put under one department for maintenance and replaced with standard specifications written depending on the particular need. This would ensure better control over maintenance and would increase cost reductions by having one department in charge of all City vehicles. One of the biggest problems we now have is the area of our routine maintenance on Police Department and Fire Department vehicles. This has been required because our me~hanics are not trained in the technology in computerized timing and fuel injection systems. This along with other shortcomings have caused our contract labor bill to increase dramatically. Our first year goals with the new garage include complete training for a tune-up man, transmission and electrical specialists, as well as fully qualifying men in brake work. Long term objectives include the ability to perform light body work and replacing engines. Steps taken thus far include the implementation of a automated vehicle maintenance program (which has worked well in our Police Department) and on is over $100,000 in equipment for the new garage. However, we are still deficient in training and the overall garage operation. The current operating budget for the City garage is $96,000. We anticipate an increase of possibly 2 mechanics and at least one supervisor in next years budget. The job description of the supervisor will include the implementation of the automated vehicle maintenance program for all City vehicles and equipment. Source of Funds: Sufficient funds are available in the reserve for contingency and a budget transfer is required as follows: From To Amount 01-99-01-5970 01-20-01-4800 $9,500 Recommendation: Approve Support Service Fund concept and specifically approve the position of Support Service Director position at a proposed salary range of $30,100 to $43,320 annually. . Further approve the proposal of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. to assist in planning this new fund for a fee not to exceed $9,500, and the budget transfer as indicated above. CITY OF NORTHRICHLAND HILLS Ii I I I I I 111- CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I " I I Department: Finance 6/9/86 Council Meeting Date: SUbject: Proposed Bond Sale - 1986 Series General Obligation Bonds Agenda Number: GN 86-56 The City of North Richland Hills is at a point in the budget consideration for fiscal year 1986/87 at which guidance is needed for the possible sale of the second installment of $6,000,000 of General Obligation Bonds which were voted in September of. 1985. Funds will be required for all five proposition, including; Police Facility, Completion of Library/ Community Center, Fire Protection, Streets/Thoroughfares, and Drainage. In conversations with our financial advisor (Mr. Harold McInroe, First Southwest Company), the following i~ems were pointed out that will be of interest to the Council: a. The Senate version of House Bill 3838 has now been published. Essentially, the restrictions on the issuance of tax exempt bonds are generally the same as HB3838, as follows: 1. Rebate of interest income above arbitrage is the same. 2. The effective date however is 1/1/87. b. However a joint session of the House & Senate subcommittee has established a compromise date of 9/1/86. include the new debt service for this issue in the 1986/87 budget according to the restrictions as established by State Property Tax Code, we must have the bonds sold and delivered prior to setting a tax rate. The projections made by Mr. McInroe indicate that we should get on a summer bond sale schedule and budget considerations indicate we should sell the bonds in late July with delivery of the bond proceeds in late August. Advantages for a July sale are as follows: 1. Interest rates are still reasonable prior to the 9/1/86 effective date for H.B. 3838 2. Avoidance of any restrictions coming from legislation from Congress 3. Ability to levy tax in 1986/87 budget for debt service requirements Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ---e; /l7~~.. ~ Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Fmance Director " City Manager Page 1 of 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Disadvantages of a July sale as now seen: 1. It is possible that passage of actual legislation may remove the confusion from the bond market and a smaller sale calendar may create a better interest rate scenario after September 1. 2. Selling bonds twice in this fiscal year will accelerate principal and interest costs for 1986/87. However the tax levy for debt will not exceed the amount presented to the voters in the bond election. Mr. McInroe will be present to discuss all the alternatives at Monday nights Council Meeting. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council authorize proceeding with the necessary requirements for the sale of $6,000,000 in Series 1986 General Obligation Bonds. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :1 Source of Funds: I Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget e Other CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration _ Council Meeting Date: 6/9/86 Agenda Number: GN 86-57 Subject: Appointment to Various Boards and Commissions It is the Staff's understanding that the following appointments have been determined by the City Council to be made: Board of Adjustment (2 year terms) David Barfield Jack Roseberry Billy Cypert Ron Hubbard (Alt.) Forrest Grubb (Alt.) Board of Appeals (2 year terms) Orville Baker Joe Coulson John Larriviere Robert Skinner Erick Hill Byron Sibbet (Alt.) Cable TV (2 year term) *Gaye Ingram Library Board (2 year terms) Polly Brinkley Jan Daniels Lynn O'Day Mickey Oxford Park and Recreation Board (2 year term) Sharon Battles Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available (KIf1/~ City Manager . Frnance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 2 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I Planning and Zoning Commission (2 year terms) Don Bowen Carole Flippo (Alt.) Mark Wood John Schwinger *Additional appointments will be submitted at the City Council Meeting Monday night. 1.1 I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS · . 6/9/86 - Council Meeting Date: Department: Parks and Recreation SUbject: Resolution Regardin2 Hi2hwav Beautification Grant Agenda Number: GN 86-58 On June 9, 1986, we received a letter from the Department of Highways and Public Transportation in Austin informing us that our beautification grant had been officially approved in their regular May meeting (see attached letter). The project is the long delayed improvementof the triangle west of the City Hall. According to the letter, a resolution must be approved authorizing an individual to sign the agreement with the State on behalf of the City. In order to expedite the project, it is requested that this action be taken on an emergency basis. The proper notification and posting has been accomplished. Recommendation: It is recommended that a resolution be adopted authorizing Rodger N. Line to sign said agreement with the State. Finance Review I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ ¡ Operating Budget _ ! _Other ~Jil;-P~'lu) £11 ;; ~ I ;; Department Head Signature City 't~er I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I RESOLUTION NO. 86-25 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, THAT: 1. The City Manager, Rodger N. Line, be and is hereby authorized to execute the agreement called for in Minute Order Number 84448, State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, as the act and deed of the City. A copy of said Minute Order and the transmittal letter of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, dated June 3, 1986, is attached hereto for identification purposes. PASSED AND APPROVED this 9th day of June, 1986. APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney for the City I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER-DIRECTOR MARK G. GOODE --- ROBERT C. LANIER, CHAIRMAN THOMAS M. DUNNING RA Y STOKER, JR. AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701-2483 --- June 3, 1986 IN REPLY REFER TO FILE NO. 18 D- L Mr. David M. Petika, Director Parks and Rærætion Deparbnent City of North Richland Hills PO Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TeKas 76118 Dær Mr. Petika: We are happy to report that the State Highway and Public Transportation Cormnission, during their rBJular meeting of May 1986, passErl Minute Order Number 84448 which authorizes our Department to match your commitment toward highway beautification through the Landscape Development Matching Program. A copy of this Minute Order is attacherl for your information. In the near future, we will forward an agreement for your review and signature. This document will stipulate the responsibili ti es of both parties baserl upon our previous discussions and nBJotiations. After final signature by our Administration here in Austin, we will proceerl with project implanentation. We will also r8:1Uire a copy of the Ci tx Resolution or Ordinance which stipulates the individual authorizerl to sign the agreana1t on behalf of the Ci ty wi th the return of the agreement. We sincerely appreciate your ccmnitma1t, support and interæt in highway beautification and look forward to working with you on this project. If there is addi tional information you might neerl from our office, please feel free to contact Paul Northcutt, landscape architect, at (512) 465-6301. Sincerely yours, In¡&Þ1- ./IdM/ Milton M. Dietert, Chief Engineer of Safety and Maintenance Operations cc: District 2 - Mr. Glenn Elliott 1831_\1986 SéS~Ut~~1~t\"~ I fie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I Form 330-8 Rev. 5-85 STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Tarrant County District No. 2 MINUTE ORDER Page 1 of 1 Pages b1iEREAS, in ~arrant County, on interstate BiCjJhway 820 at Holiday Lane, the City of North Rich1and Hil18 desires to assist in landscape develo.I;Cnent and maintenance by providing a DOn-cash øontr.1hut1on of $16.9?3.60 which has beeD detezm1ned as the fair market value of inst:alJ..ation and maintenance as :œquixed by the p%Oject design plan, and WHEREAS, the State Department of BigJ1vays and Etab11c TraDSportation desires to CCIOperate in this endeawr by obligat.ing lunda .as may be necessary to provide an aqreod EmÐunt of material. for use OD the project. and as called for on the pzoject design plan, NOW, 1'EE1ŒFORE, the Engineer-Director is directad. to accept t:his offer with gratitude and enter into any necessaxy agreementa with the City of North RichJ.and HJ.1.la for the completion of the worlt, financi.ng the Sta1:e costs wi th funds authorized by the Landscape Development Matching Program, under Q)mmission Minute Order NtmIber 83030, at a State cost not to exceed $11,500.00. Submitted by: Examined and recommended by: (Title) Chief Engil1eer of Safety and 14aintena..~ce Operations . Approved Deputy Director Field Operations Engineer- Director Approved: Commissioner 84448 . HAY' 29 86 Minute Number Commissioner Date Passed Commissioner Note: This form is to be submitted in quintuplicate. I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Purchasing Department: KaL1ficaLion of Concess10na1re ~onLraCL for Northfield Park Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PU 86-17 6-9-86 Subject: Within the last year we have solicited and advertised for someone to run the concession service at Northfield Park. We have encountered numerous problems trying to accomplish this task. The Vendors who answered our advertisement are hesitant to open concession for one park, also they want previous history of sales. Obviously we do not have this not ever having run concessions from our parks. In addition to the above, our concessionaire agreement requires insurance and full accountability for their actions and sales. In my last mailout of specifications, I have been able to find one person who is interested, William Kidd, Concessionaire. Mr. Kidd offered to pay the City of North Richland Hills 12% of his gross profit for a one year contract at Northfield Park. I have been able to negotiate Mr. Kidd to 15%. This is a no cost item to the City of North Rich1and Hills. Mr. Kidd will supply all food and personnel for the concessions at Northfie1d Park for the baseball season. Because the softball season is already underway, without concessions being available, and due to the cancellation of the May 26th City Council meeting, Mr. Kidd has been retained for a one year contract effective June 2nd, subject to City Council ratification. The Parks and Recreation Board has recommended approval of this action. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council ratify a one year contract with William Kidd, Concessionaire in an~'amount of 15% gross sales to be paid to the City of North Richland Hills. N/A Finance Review Acct. Number N/ A Sufficient Funds Available k 1Il/~ City Manager , Finance Director ITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I \- I I THE STATE OF TEXAS )( COUNTY OF TARRANT ) ( KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CONCESSION CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT made and entered into by and between the CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City", I II I I and William W. Kidd Concessionaire's, hereinafter called "Concessionaires", shall be as follows: WIT N E SSE T H: I. I I !I That the City of North Richland Hills hereby grants unto Concessionaires the concession rights and privileges to sell and supply the public with edible merchandise, including soft drinks, at the Northfield Park Concession, located at 7804 Davis Boulevard, for a I I I" I period of one (1) year, beginning June 2, 1986 and ending June 2, 1987 : such concession agreement shall be for a one year term unless concessionaire gives a 30 day written notice to the City of intent to terminate this agreement. The City of North Richland Hills reserves the right to cancel this agreement at anytime with 30 days notice. I ~ I I Concessionaire shall pay as consideration for the privileges I of doing business on City Park property 15% percent of gross receipts from all concession operations conducted under this contract I at said location, which percentages shall be payable to City within I five (5) days after the close of each month's operations. 15% percent of gross receipts shall be deposited weekly by Concessionaire I into an escrow account and held for the City until paid to City in accordance with the terms of this agreement. I ~ Each monthly payment shall be accompanied by a complete report of the month's business transactions on standard monthly report forms (as I furnished by the City of North Richland Hills), including total of the sales of all commodities as reflected in this contract. The City, I through its representatives, shall have the right to audit such record of sales at any time; "furthermore, there shall be attached with I each payment forwarded to the City a daily sales report for the period I reported. I The City Manager or his authorized representative shall have the right to approve the food and drink concession equipment for this I service, as well as all food and drink items to be sold. All persons I f conducting this operation and actually handling the sales and supervision must be 18 years or older. I I Ie I I The Concessionaire shall provide adequate trash receptacles in the I area being served by this operation. I Said Contract shall be subject to the following express I conditions, the violation of anyone of which shall be sufficient cause for the cancellation of this contract by the City, to wit: I a) SIGNS~- Signs or advertising matter displayed either inside or I outside of the portions of the structure under concession II shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager or his authorized representative. I b) LOCATION'- The Parks and Recreation Director or those under I his authority will locate and determine the place that may be I used by Concessionaire in the exercise of his rights under this contract. I c) SALE OF FOOD ITEMS. I I I Ie I (1) Food Items to be sold are: A) Soft drinks (Dr. Pepper products only) B) Popcorn C) Nachos D) Sno-Cones I I , I I E) Hot Dogs F) Candy Bars (assorted variety) G) (assorted variety) Concessionaire will also be responsible for maintaining adequate stock of food items and associated supplies. Concessionaire will be responsible for ordering, purchasing, and storage of food items, paper supplies, and condiments. All service items shall be paper, plastic or cardboard, no glass containers will be allowed to be disposed to the public. I I I I ~ I I 2) Concessionaire will not be permitted to sell beer or any intoxicating beverages. All City, State and County and other governmental regulations relative to public health and other factors shall apply, and shall be strictly óbserved by Concessionaire. I 3) No sales with any element of chance shall be made on said complex. No hawking or noisy canvassing for sales shall be made on any part of the grounds of said complex. No novelties or school supplies shall be sold by concessionaire. I I 4) I I f I 5) I I Ie I f) CLEANLINESS:- the business shall be conducted in a clean, orderly and legitimate manner and in accordance with existing ordinances and laws regulating food establishments. No rubbish, glass or bottles of any kind shall be allowed to accumulate upon the grounds or in any buildings by Concessionaire. The premises of said complex, in and around the concession, are to be kept clean and sanitary. I I I I I 1) HEALTH -- I A) All Concession facilities will have and maintain a current Health Department permit. B) All Concession workers will have a Food Handlers I permit. C) The operator shall sell or dispose of all items prior to product expiration date. D) Maintain and clean all equipment daily. I I I g) WASTE WATER - Concessionaire shall not throw any waste water on or around any trees or shrubbery in the park, and shall dispose of such water through sewers or in such a manner as not to injure any growing plants or grass and so as not to be unsightly. I I Ie I I I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I h) LIABILITY - The City does not guarantee police protection and will not be liable for any loss or damage sustained by Concessionaire as the result of criminal behavior or civil unrest. Concessionaire shall hold and save the City of North Richland Hills whole and harmless for any and all claims for damages of whatsoever nature and kind, suffered or asserted to or have been suffered by the person or property of any person whomsoever growing out of or resulting form or in anywise connected with the exercise of the privilege herein granted. i) ELECTRIC LIGHTS, POWER AND WATER 1) City shall pay for all electricity and water used for concession operation. 2) Any additional outlets for electricity, water or any other utilities desired by concession operator shall be installed at his expense. In no event shall the electric load be connected which will exceed the available circuit capacity. Increasing electric service beyond existing capacity shall be done at Concessionaire's expense and only with the approval of the City. I I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I Ie I k) j) SUBLET 1) Concessionaire hereunder shall not sublet or assign this contract to any other persons, or any of the privileges conveyed herein, except upon the written approva~ of the City. In the event of a sale of stock in a corporate concessionaire, City shall be notified prior to any such sale and may terminate this contract if it deems such to be in its best interest. Any approved assignee or sub-concessionaire under this provision shall be subject to all the provisions and conditions of this contract. 2) That in case any sub-concessionaire or employee of the concessionaire is found willfully violating any law or ordinance or the terms of this contract, or becomes objectionable and offensive to the good order and use of said grounds, the said Concessionaire may be required to remove any such person from said grounds at once. That in case the Concessionaire shall fail to discharge and remove the said person from his employ, the City may terminate and cancel this agreement at its option. EQUIPMENT~- It is understood and agreed that the Concessionaire shall use his own equipment or the existing equipment. I I f I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I 1) ALTERATIONS'- It is specifically understood that any changes or alterations within the concession stand shall be made at the expense of the concession operator; and no changes or alterations (including painting, etc.) shall be done without the approval of the City. DELIVERIES:- Delivery trucks shall not be permitted within the park area except on the existing service drive and then only for loading. PAYMENTS - If Concessionaire should default in payment of any installment provided for under this contract, as the same becomes due and payable, or should any execution be issued against Concessionaire, bankruptcy proceedings be begun by or against the ConcesSionaire, or an assignment be made by the Concessionaire for the benefit of creditors, or should the premises be placed in the possession of a Receiver, then and in any such case, at the option of the City, this contract shall be null and void. LIEN - Concessionaire hereby gives to the City a lien upon all of his property now or at any time hereafter placed in and upon the premises to secure the prompt payment of the payment herein stipulated to be paid for the use of said premises, all exemptions of such property or any of it being hereby waived. m) n) 0) I I r I I I I I p) SPECIAL CONDITIONS - Concessionaire understands that no vehicle may be parked on the property in other than designated parking areas. Personal vehicles may be used to make deliveries to the concession stand, but must be parked in the designated areas immediately after loading. II I ~ I I During the term of this contract, Concessionaire shall carry, with a company satisfactory to the City and authorized to do business in the State of Texas, at Concessionaire's expense, the following insurance coverage: I I I I I f I Public Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND AND NO/IOO DOLLARS ($300,000.00) CSt; and shall provide a Certificate of Insurance to the City. II ~ I I III I I It is expressly understood and agreed by Concessionaire that I the City reserves the right to operate any additional concessions other than those granted to Concessionaire herein, in the event that I the City determines that such additional concession services are in the public interest. I IV ~ I It is further understood and agreed that the Concessionaire will I vacate the premises without delay in the event this agreement is terminated as provided herein and in case the Concessionaire fails to I vacate the said premises at the termination of this agreement, the I City of North Richland Hills shall not be responsible for any damage that might occur to said Concessionaire by virtue of City forcibly I entering and dispossessing the said Concessionaire. I I , I v Concessionaire shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment, and in providing the public service specified in this agreement, because of race, creed, color or national origin. I ~ I I I Concessionaire shall , in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Concessionaire, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to reace, creed, color or national origin. The City reserves the right to and will make inspection of all Concession facilities, any violation of health laws shall be immediate grounds for I I I termination of this contract. I II VI I It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that this contract shall be enforceable in Tarrant County, Texas, and if legal action is necessary to enforce this contract exclusive venue shall lie in I Tarrant County, Texas. I VII I The Concessionaire shall be deemed to be an Independent Contractor I for all purposes and shall in no way be an employee or agent of the City. In this connection, the details of how and when the Concessionaire's activities are conducted shall be its business and not the City's concern. EXECUTED THIS 22 day of May , 19 86 I -- I I I ~ I I I 'I I I I . I I I I I I Ie I I APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Rex McEntire, Attorney Rodger N. Line, City Manager By !/¡~L~¿~ ¡fV~ By CON:¿::IONAlRE:~ Ú ~tJ ~J By I I I , ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Utility Council Meeting Date: 6-9-86 Agenda Number: PW 86-18 Subject: Authorization for Engineering of Water and Sewer Capital Improvements The projects that the Council needs to authorize are listed on the first page of the city engineer's letter. These are the new water and sewer projects that officially need to be authorized for the new $4,L20,OOO bond issue. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of the engineering and construction of the following projects. Beach Street Water Line Amundson Road Stand Pipe College Hills Water Tank Replacement Pressure Plane and Altitude Valve Installation on Rufe Snow Water Tank Water and Sewer System Analysis Watauga Road Utility Adjustments Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) gihe;~ting Budget ~ ~ ~ ~aj~º-- . . -' K 11/; , Department Head Signature ' City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acel. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I -- I I I I.. I I I -- I I I I I I I t' I . ~ /'- ~ L:f' KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas June 2, 1986 Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager City of North Richland Hills . 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-500, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1986-1988 WATER AND SEWER REVENUE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM PROJECTS AUTHORIZATION OF SERVICES Upon Council consideration and approval of this proposal for Engineering Servicest and in accordance with the provisions of Section lIlt Authorization of Services, of our "AgreeTIent for Engineering Services" Contract, dated June 13t 1977t such action shall constitute authorization by the City Council of North Richland Hills for Knowlton-English-Flowerst Inc't to perform engineering services for design and administration of the Water and Sewer Capital Improvements Projects listed below: PROJECT DESCRIPTION SCHEDULED BEGIN DATE END DATE Beach Street Water Line Amundson Standpipe College Hills Water Tank Pr e s .s u r e P 1 an e/ A 1 t . Val. Ins t a 11 . Water and Sewer System Analysis Watauga Road Utility Adjustments 06/86 09/86 11 188 08/86 06/86 10/86 01/88 12/87 ~1/89 ,,189 06/87 06/87 10/87 The Engineer agrees to complete the authorized services in accordance with the indicated schedule or such schedule as may be later modified by the City Councilor Staff and agreed upon by both the City and Engineer. The Engineer is authorized to begin work on any or all projects before the scheduled commencement dates on the listed schedule, howevert the Owner is not obligated to compensate the Engineer for work performed on specific projects until engineering for these projects is scheduled to begin. Engineering services required to be performed for this assignment by continued., next page 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I ~e I I I I. I I I -- I I I I I I I (' I ~ . June 2, 1986 1986-1988 W & S CIP PROJECTS Page 2 Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc., Consulting Engineers shall be as outlined in Section II, (B), (C), and (0) of our IIAgreement for Engineering Servi'ces" Contract dated June 13, 1977, and shall consist of (1) preparation of construction plans and specifications, (2) preparation of easement, right-of-way and permit descriptions, (3) coordination of the obtaining of soil borings and foundation investigations as required, and (4) performing the construction administration along with the furnishing of support services consisting of field surveys for layout and grade ·control. Compensation to the Engineer shall be in accordance with Section VI, (B) and (D) of the aforementioned Engineering Agreement for each specific project included in the Water and Sewer Capital Improvements Progra~. Please call if you have any questions regarding this assignment. , RICHARD W. ALBIN, RWA/bvg Enclosures cc. Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager ~ Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works ,/ t~r. Allen Bronstad, ·Utility Department Office· Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance 11 . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I I I Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~gfhe;:J::g:t I - Department Head Signature I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I I Department: Public Works 6-9-86 Council Meeting Date: SUbject: Partial Pay Estimate 116 and Final in the Amount of $77,239.42 to Walker Construction for Flory Street, Water, Sewer, and Drainage Improvements Agenda Number: PAY 86-17 This job is 100% complete at this time. The City had a request from Walker Construction in January for an extension of time on this job because the gas company caused a delay in their work. Funding Source: The original budget appropriated by City Council and actual expenditures to date are listed as follows: Budget Actual Balance Engineering 1. Street & Drainage $19,000 $10,412.07 $ 8,587.93 2. Water & Sewer $10,000 7,271.24 2,728.76 Street & Drainage $375,000 $305,016.79 $ 69,983.21 Water Systems 60,500 54,762.30 5,737.70 Sewer Systems 60,700 61,409.70 ( 709.70) Total $525,200 $438,872.1.0 $ 86,327.90 Sufficient funds are available to pay the final estimate #6. The actual column indicates all payments to include pay estimate #6. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of the following: 1. Final payment be made to Walker Construction in the amount of $77,239.42. 2. All change orders be ratified by City Council. 3. The transfer of $69,983.21 of Street and Drainage Budget to Unspecified Street and Drainage. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number SUffiC~dS Availa:. 1L... 0 Finance Director ....-" - City Manager Page 1 of 1 I ._, .~-,- Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I II I I f I L e;z.-; KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSUlTINC ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas June 4, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North R;chland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-219, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS FLORY STREET PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS WATER, SEWER, STREET, & DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION CONTR. PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 6 & FINAL Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.6 & Final, dated June 3, 1986, made payable to Walker Construction Co., in the amount of $77 ,239.42, for material s furnished and work perfonned on the referenced project as of June 2, 1986. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCalllJil, as indicated by signature on the estinate, and we have checked the itEm extensions and additions. This project includes paving, drainage, and water and sewer'utility construction on Flory Street from Grapevine Highway to Glenview Drive. The original contract amount was $382,896.58. Final Contractor earnings total $421,228.19, which is $38,331.61 over the original contract æ10unt based on contract unit prices and original estimated quantities. As shown on the attached "Construction Project Status Report", most of the cost over-run is the result of additional concrete driveway approaches which were constructed as required, but which were not included in the original project design. Al so incl uded in the over-run cost is Changer Order No.1 in the amount of $6,580 for a french drain required to handle ground water pockets which were discovered after construction began. The budgeted amount for this project is $394,000, and the paving and drainage assessments against adjacent property owners totals $90,057.88 based on the assessement roll transmitted to the City by letter' dated March 6, 1984. In accordance with Section 3.2.11(a) of the Contract, the two (2) year tenn of maintenance will begin on this date, and therefore, will tenninate on June 4, 1988. The maintenance obl igation includes repair of all sewer breaks or stoppage, and malfunctions of other equipment furnished and installed under this contract. The maintenance obl igation also includes sealing of pavement cracks, repair of pavement buckl ing or other failures 5 ~ D r 1P 7 8 I 3' q 14-'7- w~S ::. - 'J08'O,()èJ --- Continued <t 77 Z2..c::t LL<-., Tr I ~ I, lr 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I/~ Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I June 4, 1986 FLORY STREET FINAL ESTIMATE Page 2 resulting from storm drain backfill settlement or other subgrade failure, along with failure of all concrete flatwork and other concrete structures such as storm drain vaults and inlets. The Contract Completion Time was 150 Calenday Days, and the Contractor completed the project in 168 Calendar Days based on a Work Order Date of December 16, 1985, and a Completion Date of June 2, 1986. However, the Contractor was delayed by Lone star Gas 27 days as noted on the attached correspondence dated February 27, 1986. Therefore, we do not recommend assessment of 1 iquidated damages for this project. We recommend that the total payment, in amount of $77,239.42, be made to Walker Construction Co., 4028 Daley st., Fort Worth, Texas 76118. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. Wr~ ALB IN, P. E. RWA: b vg Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager r~r. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Publ ic Works Allen Bronstad, Office of Utility Department Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Larry Jones, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Wal.ker Construction Co. I~ . Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I I : ~~.I.(ì<:" - ~~~ c ~ ,., '"" ·W A'~~· ; I I I t WALKER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY General Contractors po. Box 18397 Fort Worth, Texas 76118 817/284-9208 January 30, 1986 City of North Richland Hills Re: 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Flory Street Project Cont. #K-E-F No. 3-219 Attn: Mr. Riddle Gentlemen: In accordance with the contract documents, we hereby give notice of our request for "Extension of Time" to our contract completion date due to delays to our work created by Lone Star Gas Company's lines. The utility portion of our work will be 100% complete on January 31, 1986. At that time, the remainder of our work will be delayed or severely impeded due to the work of Lone Star Gas. Therefore, we hereby respectfully reserve our right to make claim for all additional costs due to delays to our work and job inefficiencies created by the work of Lone Star Gas Company. It is our contention that the Lone Star Gas line work could not have reasonably been anticipated at bid time. Should you desire additional information concerning the above, please contact this writer. Very truly yours, WALKER CONST~UCTION J cc: Floyd McCallum - City of North Richland Hills Richard Albin - Knowlton-English-Flowers Allen Bromstead - City of North Richland Hills Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) GO/Rev a Operating Budget - _Othe~ _ ~ Department Head Signatu CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I- I I I ~ I CITY OF NORTH RICH LA NO HILLS Department: Public Works Council Meeting Date: 6-9-86 Subject: Municipal Complex Pay Estimate #7 and Final in the Amount of $36,901.33 Agenda Number: PAY 86-18 All of this project has been completed by Austin Road Company with the exception of the concrete lined drainage channel along the railroad. Since we have not received a permit from the railroad to put the drainage channels along their right-of-way, it may be sometime before Austin Road could get back in and build this channel. Since they have completed everything but the channel the staff feels that Austin Road should be paid a final payment for everything that they have built to this date. This includes paying them for their retainage. However, their bid for the channel is still good until sometime in October and if we receive our permit before then, then we will have Austin Road come back and complete this job. Funding Source: The final pay estimate number 7 should be expensed as follows: 02-60-00-6750 02-60-00-6200 13-90-00-6150 $ 20,577.90 $ 8,161.72 $ 8,161.71. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of payment to Austin Road Company in the amount of $36,901.33. Finance Review See above . Finance Director City Manager Page 1 of 1 I .~ . .. ~ I I I I I I I , I I I I I I l- I I ..,. &f:-,J e; KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINE ERS I Fort Worth- Dallas May 22, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of North R;chland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-335, CITY OF NORTH RICH LAND HILLS MUNICIPAL COMPLEX SITE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR'S PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO.7 PAVING AND UTILITY FINAL Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No.7 dated May 21, 1986, made payable to Austin Road Co., in the amount of $36,901.33, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of April 30, 1986. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representative, Floyd McCallum, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. This estimate includes all paving, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the Municipal Complex Site. The proposed concrete channel along the south side of the Complex Site, within the st. Louis Southwestern Railroad right-of-way, has not yet been constructed because permission from the Railway. Company to do this work has not yet been Öbtained. Please see the attached letter dated April 18, 1986, for a further explanation of the Contract provisions concerning the channel work. Total Contractor earnings for all work, except the concrete channel, total $411,558.01". The original Contract amount, excluding the channel work, totals $430,690.07, which is $19,132.06 under the budget for this project. The estimated amount of channel work remaining to be performed totals $126,490.65 based on Contract unit prices and estimated quantities of construct; on. In accordance with Section 3.2.11(a) of the Contract, the two(2) year term· of maintenance will begin on this date, and therefore, will terminate on May 22, 1988, for all work except the channel. The maintenance obligation includes repair of all water line leaks and malfunctions of all valves, fire hydrants, and other equipment furnished and installed under this Contract along with storm and sanitary sewer line breaks or stoppage. The Continued ... 1901 CENTRAL DR.. SUITE 550 · BEDFORD.. TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211. METRO/267·3367 I Ie' I I I I I I I , I I I I I I '- I I May 22, 1986 MUNICIPAL COMPLEX SITE Page 2 maintenance obligation also includes sealing of pavement cracks, repair of pavement buckling or other failures resulting from utility line backfill settlement or other subgrade failures, along with failure of all storm drain vaults and inlets. The total Contract Time of Completion for everything except the concrete channel is 240 Calendar Days, and the Contractor has used only 191 days. The scheduled completion date, based on the 240 Calendar Day period is June 18, 1986, however the Contractor remains obligated to perform the Channel work, upon direction by the Public Works Department, until October. 21, 1986, based on the Contract Unit Prices bid in the Proposal. Contract Completion Time for the Channel work will be set by change order and approved by the City Council. We recommend that this payment, in amount of $36,901.33, be made to Austin Road Co., P.O. Box 2285, Fort Worth, Texas 76113. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. " RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA:bvg Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager 7Mr.. Gene Riddle, Director of Publ;c Works / Mr. Allen Bronstad, utility Department Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Planning Mr. John Whitney, Purchasing Agent Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Austin Road Co. I Ie~ I I I I I .1 I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I ,.... ...... E~::::::· {";.... ç...... KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas April 18, 1986 Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works City of North R;chland Hills 7301 N.E..Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-335, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MUNl C I PAL CO~'PLEX 51 TE IMRPOVEr~ENTS RAILROAD CHANNEL This is to remind you that permission from the St. Louis Southwestern Railroad ;s still 'required to construct the off-site concrete channel on the railroad right-af-way as required to drain the Municipal Complex Site. 'The provisions of Section 3.2~14 of the Contract Documents state that ·'the contractor shall perform all other work included in this Contract excepting off-site channel construction until the. City of North Richtand Hi Ils has obtained the st. Louis Southwestern Railroad permit. Acquisiti,on of the permit could take from six to twelve months from the. work order date (October 21, 1985) to obtain, therefore, the Contractor should bid the pay itans for channel work accordingly. If the permit has not been obtained within twelve months of the work order date (which will be October 21,1986), then the Contractor may request extra pay for off-site channel work -- subject to approval by the City Council. However, the Owner reserves the right to .delete any or _all of the off-site channel work from the Contract if the permit has not been obtained within the twelve month period (by October 21, 1986), with no extra compensation to the Contractor. A change order for a time extension will be made when the permit is obta i ned. .. "The Contract completion date is June 18, 1986, but. the Contract9r is already substantially complete with all items except the channel. The contractor is .request·;ng that the City pay Austin Road the retainage on this project at this time since the job is complete except for the channel. If you are satisfied with the work and a final inspection is compl.eted for the paving, storm drainage, water and sewer improvements, ·then we have no objection to payment of the retaînage at this time. Please call if you have any questions. . .~aJ- W, OiL- RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc. Mr. Rodger N. Line, c,ty Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager t~r.· Richard Royston, Director of Planning I~r. Floyd McCallum, City. Inspector Mr. Dwight Smith, Austin Road 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 · 817/283-6211 · METRO/267·3367