Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1986-08-11 Agendas I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of J(ðrth Richland Hills~ Texas \;&- ~..--~ Ø1 i f::~ \;1 ~ August 8, 1986 PUBLIC NOTICE Emergency Item Added to the August 11, 1986 City Council Agenda. *26a. PU 86-20 Emergency Repair of Sewer Cleaning Truck in the Amount of $9,000 to Environmental Sales (:S~â2l&ti 'I'I~ Assistant City Secretary ,; If., (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. lOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HillS, TX 76118 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of J(ðrth Richland Hills~ Texas ~~t1 ~~..; >0. ===- ß¡,t':~ ''/ I f August 8, 1986 ADDENDUM CORRECTION TO AUGUST 11, 1986 PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA 1. GN 86-83 Schematic Design of Fire Station #4, Training Center and Fire Administration Building (Agenda Item No. 22) @tJØierti fI~ Assistant City Secretary (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of J(ðrth Richland Hills~ Texas ~I ~'1 // ~I - ~.~--~ Pt~ August 8, 1986 ADDENDUM CORRECTION TO AUGUST 11, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA *22. GN 86-83 Schematic Design of Fire Station #4, Training Center and Fire Administration Offices ~Ø7¿¡e/a f/~ SS1stant C1ty Secretary (817) 281-0041/7301 N.E. LOOP 820/P.O. BOX 18609/NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX 76118 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I à-> '!I"'~-'''\/:''''->~:~:~-_'''-':>~-:--~~''>:_'Y> _ ..;~~,~,---:!- -. ';i~'~.s~~:''!fi('I!r::';;;.<->__t.,:~·,~·~.;·,;_;-~¡:~"{-:!f:f',:'i'_._-~.2--___~~"-.,,, ~'"'J-~- _~_,-_.-~. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 11, 1986 - 6:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. GN 86-83 Schematic Design of Community Center & Library (Agenda Item No. 22) 2. GN 86-84 Proposed High Grass & Weed Ordinance, Ordinance No. 1392 (Agenda Item No. 23) 3. GN 86-86 Public Hearing - Operating Budget (Agenda Item No. 25) GN 86-85 Public Hearing - Revenue Sharing Budget (Agenda Item No. 24) ,; :1"~ 4. Discussion of Format and Date for Workshop with Boards and Commissions 5. GN 86-87 Community Development Block Grant (Agenda Item No. 26) 6. GN 86-82 Request of Carlisle Property for Release of Utility Easement (Agenda Item No. 21) 7. Other Items ,Tr'>""~/',"4-.'J', ,..'r'!' i'~"\>'.f-'; =~';'~~":-'r-'~> I Page 2 I NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN I I 8. *Executive Session to Discuss Land, Personnel, and/or Litigation I I *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law I I I I I I It. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 11, 1986 For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting July 28, 1986 5. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 6. Consent Agenda Item (s) indicated by Asterisk (19, 21, 22, 23, & 26) 7. PZ 86-22 PLANNING & ZONING - APPEAL HEARING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of the Chasewood Construction Co. (Quinten's Crossing) to rezone Lot 1, Block 12, Snow Heights North Addition from R-7-MF-PD (with restricted fencing) to R-7-MF-PD (Relief from restricted fencing) (Located on north side of Loop 820 between Reynolds Road and Thaxton Parkway) 8. Ordinance No. 1379 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 9. PZ 86-28 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of David Barfield to rezone Tracts 4, 4B, 4C, 4D, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from AG (Agriculture) to C-l (Commercial) (Located at the northwest corner of Precinct Line Road and Martin Road) 10. Ordinance No. 1387 11. PZ 86-30 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Frank Lynch to rezone a portion of Tract 5, s. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from AG (Agriculture) and C-l (Commercial) to R-3 (Single Family) (Located north of Green Valley Drive and west of Davis Boulevard) 12. Ordinance No. 1388 13. PZ 86-31 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Frank Lynch to rezone a portion of Tract 5, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located north of Green Valley Drive and west of Davis Boulevard) 14. Ordinance No. 1389 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 15. PZ 86-32 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Marvin D. Smith to rezone Lot 9, Block 4, Maroaks Addition, from R-5-D (Duplex) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located at southwest corner of Lincoln Drive and Spring Lea Way) 16. Ordinance No. 1390 17. PZ 86-33 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Esprit Investments to rezone Tract 4, W.D. Barnes Survey, Abstract 146, from AG (Agriculture) to R-2 (Single Family) (Located on north side of Starnes Road, west of Red Oak Drive) 18. Ordinance No. 1391 *19. PS 86-33 Request of Diamond Shamrock Corporation for Replat of Lots l-RA and l-RB, Parkers Subdivision (Located on the northwest corner of Grapevine Highway and Scruggs Drive) 20. GN 86-81 Appointments to Various Boards & Commissions *21. GN 86-82 Request of Carlisle Property for Release of Utility Easement I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *22. GN 86-83 Schematic Design of Community Center & Library *23. GN 86-84 Proposed High Grass & Weed Ordinance, Ordinance No. 1392 24. GN 86-85 Public Hearing - Revenue Sharing Budget 25. GN 86-86 Public Hearing - Operating Budget *26. GN 86-87 Community Development Block Grant 27. Citizen Presentation 28. Adjournment I Ie I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I Ie I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - JULY 28, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Echols called the meeting to order July 28, 1986, at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Dan Echols Richard Davis Dick Fisher Marie Hinkle Mack Garvin Virginia Moody Harold Newman Jim Ramsey Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Councilman Staff: Rodger N. Line Patricia Hutson Rex McEntire Lee Maness Richard Albin Don Bowen City Manager Asst. City Secretary Attorney Finance Director City Engineer Planning & Zoning Member Members of the Press Absent: Dennis Horvath Jeanette Rewis Gene Riddle John Whitney Richard Royston Assistant City Manager City Secretary Public Works Director Purchasing Agent Director of Planning ;. It· 3. INVOCATION Mayor Pro Tem Davis gave the invocation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING JULY 14, 1986 APPROVED Councilman Fisher moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the minutes of the July 14, 1986 meeting. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I (' I July 28, 1986 Page 2 Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated that although he was not present at the meeting, in reading the minutes, on page 4 there was a comment concerning Councilman Ramsey regarding an accusation made to the applicant. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that all of the Council had received correspondence concerning the accusation of Councilman Ramsey calling someone a thief and it was proven that Councilman Ramsey in fact did not do that. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he felt it was a very strong accusation to make against someone, especially a colleague, and a retraction from the applicant had not been received by the Council. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that for the record he would like to show that it was proven to him that Councilman Ramsey did not make that statement. Motion carried 6-0; Mayor Pro Tern Davis abstaining due to absence from the meeting. 5. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA None 6. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (12, 14, 16, 17, & 18) APPROVED Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 7-0. 7. PZ 86-17 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ REQUEST OF FRANK B. HOLLAND TO REZONE A PORTION O~TRACT 2, J. CONDRA SURVEY, ÀBsTi~ACT 310 FROM AG TO R-2 (LOCATED NORTH OF STARNES ROAD IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE KINGSWOOD ADDITION AND SOUTH OF THE LONDONDERRY ADDITION) , ,; .&'.., Mayor Echols stated that if the Council had no objections, the applicant had requested that the Appeal Hearing - Public Hearing for PZ 86-18 also be opened with the Public Hearing for PZ 86-17. Mayor Echols opened the Public Hearings for PZ 86-17 and PZ 86-18 and called for anyone wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Mr. Doug Gilliland, Division Manager with Holland West, Inc., appeared before the Council. Mr. Gilliland stated they were requesting zoning changes on two separate tracts of land, totaling 72 acres, currently zoned Agriculture. Mr. Gilliland stated they were requesting approximately 39 acres be rezoned I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I July 28, 1986 Page 3 R-2 and 33 acres be rezoned R-3. Mr. Gilliland stated their proposal in these areas would exceed the minimum square footage that the ordinance required for these areas and they were also placing a stipulation on portions of these tracts that would require a side or rear entry garage. Mr. Gilliland stated they had talked with the landowners and the City Council and tried to take into consideration the feelings of those affected. Mr. Gilliland stated they feel these requests represent the best use for the property. Mr. Gilliland stated they felt the zoning they were requesting would make the land compatible with the surrounding property and the quality of the development they were planning would enhance the direct neighborhood and the City in general. Mr. Gilliland handed out to the Council maps showing what was being requested and the relationship of the property to surrounding property. Mr. Gilliland stated on the first request they were proposing side and rear entry garages on the portion bordering the property on the north and also on the property bordering Holiday Lane. Mr. Gilliland explained what type of property bordered the second zoning request. Mr. Gilliland stated that there would be approximately 126 lots that would be 7,500 square feet and the lots throughout would have a minimum house of 1,600 square feet. Mr. Gilliland stated that in addition they were proposing the property on the north be a minimum of 1,800 square feet with side and rear entry garages and the lots bordering the R-2 area have a 1,700 square foot minimum. Mr. Gilliland stated the major entry points and the perimeter areas would be landscaped, the subdivision would have a curbilinear design as opposed to a tract design in regards to streets, mail boxes would be brick or stone veneer, there would be underground utilities and the homeowners would have the opportunity to have gas. Mr. Gilliland stated there would be strong deed restrictions in an effort to attract custom builders. Mr. Gilliland stated he felt when this area was finished it would be comparable to the surrounding area and that the R-3 area as proposed would have homes larger than the surrounding area with stronger controls. Councilman Fisher asked for the definition of curbilinear. Mr. Gilliland stated curbilinear design cuts down on the overall density and creates more harmony to the eye. ,; if , Councilwoman Moody asked if he would be willing to go R-2 on the R-3 request as well. Mr. Gilliland stated no. Councilwoman Moody asked for his reasons. Mr. Gilliland stated that when an 1,800 square foot home is placed on an R-2 or R-l lot in that area the costs go up dramatically, which ultimately equates into a sales price that the consumer has to pay. Councilwoman Moody stated that Mr. Gilliland was controlling the environment and she could not understand why ~e would not build all R-2. Mr. Gilliland stated he was trying to make R-3 compatible not only with the R-2 but also with the surrounding area. I ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I July 28, 1986 Page 4 Councilwoman Hinkle asked Mr. Gilliland what he thought the R-3 and R-2 lots would sell for. Mr. Gilliland stated that the R-3 lots in Foster Village sold for $20,500 and Western Oaks would be higher. Councilwoman Hinkle asked if he did not feel with that price of a lot, that builders who built on R-3 lots would build larger than 1,600 square feet to make a profit. Mr. Gilliland stated yes, he felt there would be a variety of homes. Councilman Ramsey stated that Mr. Gilliland's answer to Councilwoman Hinkle's question contradicted what he said to Councilwoman Moody. Mr. Gilliland stated that as lots get bigger the cost per lot in terms of production goes up. Councilman Garvin asked if the lot sizes would be larger for the 1,800 square foot houses with side and rear entry garages on the R-3 request. Mr. Gilliland stated that to accommodate the rear and side garages it would have to be larger. Mayor Echols asked about the routing of Douglas Lane. Mr. Gilliland stated he had talked with the property owner to the north and had indicated to him that as far as their plans were concerned if the road was not cut through and a T was created to bring it back out, their plans would not be affected. Mayor Echols asked if he had a means of doing that even though it was not shown on the plans. Mr. Gilliland stated yes, but they would not change their plans until the City gave them some direction. Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated that Mr. Royston had conveyed to him that Douglas Lane would come up to the north and the street going west, out to the existing Douglas Lane, would be a T section and would not bisect Mr. Wells property. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated this would be taken care of in the platting process. Mayor Echols stated that there was a legal petition on each of these requests and it would require a three-fourths majority vote of the Council. Mayor Echols called for anyone wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. Dr. Thomas Duer, 7312 Londonderry, appeared before the Council. Dr. Duer stated that he was Vice President of the Green Valley Homeowners Association. Dr. Duer stated the impression he received from the Council was that it was unrealistic to ask for this land to remain R-2 even though it was next to R-I land. Dr. Duer presented a slide presentation to the Council which showed homes in Londonderry, different subdivisions that I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I July 28, 1986 Page 5 Holland had developed, and the problems he felt were associated with front and rear entry garages, i.e. more clutter, cars, boats, etc. Councilman Ramsey called for point of order and requested that a vote be taken to determine if the proceedings were relevant to the case. Council voted 6-1 against continuing; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilwoman Hinkle, Councilmen Newman, Fisher, Ramsey and Garvin voting against and Councilwoman Moody voting to continue. Dr. Duer stated he did not understand why a R-3 home should be next to an R-l area. Dr. Duer stated that Meadow Lakes, Diamond Loch, and Park Ridge Estates had been protected and asked why the only R-l area in the northern part of North Richland Hills could not obtain the same respect. Mr. Paul Herman, 7725 Douglas Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Herman stated the property surrounding his had been deed restricted to 1,800 square feet minimum. Mr. Herman stated his house was in excess of 2,000 square feet and he would be hurt by the small houses being built across the street. The following people indicated to the Council that they were against these zoning requests: Ms. Janet Lipar, 7813 Aubrey Lane; Mr. Scott B. Davis, 7820 Aubrey Lane; Mr. John Range, 7813 Aubrey Lane; Jeff and Diane Rogers, 7817 Aubrey Lane; Mr. and Mrs. M.L. McCormick, 7809 Aubrey Lane; Mr. and Mrs. Jim Neighbors, 7701 Aubrey Lane. Mr. Michael Salesman, 7717 Aubrey Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Salesman stated that it had been said that the developer contacted all of the homeowners adjacent to the property, but he lived along the property and was never contacted. Mr. Salesman stated the only information he had been able to receive w~s from the Green Valley Homeowners Association. Mr. Salesman stated that one of the qualities of the property was that it was heavily wooded. Mr. Salesman stated that R-3 zoning would allow smaller homes on smaller lots which would eliminate a number of trees. Mr. Salesman stated his home was 1,700 square feet and the smaller houses would hurt the value of his property. ,; ,.~ Mayor Pro Tern Davis explained to Mr. Salesman that all the homes next to his would be 1,800 square feet and this would not change until Douglas Lane. Mr. Salesman stated he was mistaken where the smaller houses started. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he was concerned that if the lots were restricted to side and rear entry garages, it would add more concrete and the trees would be eliminated. Mr. Glenn Nerwin, 7724 Aubrey Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Nerwin asked why the R-2 could not be continued further west and there be a narrow buffer. Mr. Nerwin asked if the developer felt R-3 was needed I ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I July 28, 1986 Page 6 in the development why could it not be one block and the same thing on the north side. Mr. and Mrs. Samuel Kitching, 7836 Water ford Lane, indicated to the Council their opposition to these requests. Mr. Marvin Smith, 7609 Douglas Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Smith stated he was not opposed to the development. Mr. Smith stated he realized it was hard to develop the property as R-1 because of today's high land and developments costs, however, he did not see why it could not be developed R-2, 1,800 square feet minimum throughout. Mr. Smith stated he was concerned with what went into the City. Mr. Smith stated there were certain areas left in the City that R-3 zoning would fit, but this was not one of them. Mr. Smith stated he could go along with R-2, 1,800 square feet and that he felt some of the outer edges needed to be side and rear entry garages. Mr. Smith stated that 1,600 square foot homes in R-3 zoning were not a bad size, but the problem was there were always a couple of bad apples in 1,500 and 1,600 square foot homes. Mr. Smith presented pictures to the Council of unsightly homes and stated that this could be found in any subdivision with 1,500 to 1,600 square foot homes. Mr. Smith stated he felt 1,750-1,800 square foot was the breaking point where 99 1/2 percent of people in a subdivision at least maintained their homes. Mr. Smith stated he felt the developer could live with R-2 zoning on the whole project. Councilman Ramsey asked Mr. Smith if he was saying, as a builder and a citizen, he could not support what was being proposed and was recommending denial. Mr. Smith stated yes, he felt the developer could go with the R-2 zoning with a 1,750 square foot minimum. Mr. Smith stated that with the R-3 zoning the developer would get more lots and more profit but he felt they were asking for R-3 on the west side beca~se ~þey felt the Council would buy it. ,; ~.; Mr. Ray Roberts, 7900 Douglas Lane, appeared before the Council. Mr. Roberts stated he was in opposition to the zoning. Mr. Roberts stated he could live with R-2 if the entire tract was developed in that manner with good judgment. Mayor Echols called for anyone else wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Echols closed the Public Hearings. 8. ORDINANCE NO. 1374 APPROVED Councilman Garvin stated that what was being proposed by the developer was not what he originally proposed. Councilman Garvin stated the minimum I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I July 28, 1986 Page 7 square footage had been increased in both areas, side and rear entry garages had been added, and that he had tried to compromise in a fashion where it could be worked out equitably to the homeowners and his development. Mr. Gilliland stated he would like to point out, in their attempt to try to work with the homeowners, one of the suggestions that Council made was that R-l lots border Londonderry. Mr. Gilliland stated that if Council were to make that stipulation they would be willing. Councilman Garvin moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Ordinance No. 1374 with the following stipulations: all houses in the subdivision to have a minimum of 1,800 square feet, all construction on the northern boundary to have side or rear entry garages, and all construction facing Holiday Lane to be side or rear entry garages. Councilwoman Moody asked Councilman Garvin if he would amend the motion to include all side and rear entry garages in the subdivision. Councilman Garvin stated no. Councilman Ramsey stated he wanted to compliment the five council persons he knew of who had worked on these requests in an effort to bring them to a conclusion. Councilman Ramsey stated he appreciated the homeowners and Dr. Duer and thanked everyone for their concern. Councilwoman Moody asked Councilman Garvin if he would amend his motion to R-l adjoining Londonderry and R-l that faces the now existing Douglas across from the Smith property and the other large houses. Councilman Garvin stated no. Motion carried 6-1; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilwoman Hinkle, Councilmen Newman, Fisher, Ramsey and Garvin voting for{Councilwoman Moody voting against. It; 9. PZ 86-18 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING _ APPEAL HEARING - REQUEST OF HOLLAND CORPORATION TO REZONE A PORTION OF TRACT 2, J. CONDRA SURVEY, ABSTRACT 310, FROM AG TO R-3 (LOCATED ON THE VACANT TRACT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DOUGLAS LANE SOUTH OF BURSEY ROAD) Heard in conjunction with Item No.7. 10. ORDINANCE NO. 1385 APPROVED Councilwoman Moody moved to deny Ordinance No. 1385. Motion to deny died for lack of a second. I ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I July 28, 1986 Page 8 Councilwoman Hinkle moved to approve Ordinance No. 1385. Councilman Garvin moved to amend Councilwoman Hinkle's motion to state with the following stipulations: all construction on the northern boundary to be 1,800 square feet minimum with side and rear entry garages, all construction on eastern boundary to be 1,700 square feet minimum and remaining construction to be 1,600 square feet minimum. Councilman Davis seconded the amended motion. Councilwoman Hinkle approved the amendments. Amended motion carried 6-1; Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Councilwoman Hinkle, Councilmen Newman, Ramsey, Garvin, Fisher voting for; Councilwoman Moody voting against. RECESS Mayor Echols called a recess. BACK TO ORDER Mayor Echols called the meeting back to order with the same members present as recorded. Councilman Ramsey stated it was his understanding, although it was not in the motion, that the applicant agreed to R-l on the border and as far as he was concerned that was a part of the motion. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated he disagreed. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated the motion was for R-2 specifically. Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that Councilwoman Moody had asked Councilman Garvin if he would include R-l in his motion and he stated he would not. 11. PZ 86-27 RECONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1382, REQUEST OF NASSAR SHAFIPOUR TO REZONE LOT BI-A, HOLIDAY MOBILE HOME PARK AND LOT 1, BLOCK 3, RED GATE ADDITION FROM C-1 (COMMERCIAL) TO C-2 (COMMERCIAL) (LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MOCKINGBIRD LANE AND DAVIS BOULEVARD) (DENIED AT THE JULY 14, 1986 MEETING) , ~ Mayor Echols stated that the applicant had expressed his desire to have only the shopping center area rezoned to C-2 and did not desire to have the northern section across from Mockingbird Lane rezoned. Councilwoman Hinkle moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to reconsider Ordinance No. 1382 on August 25, 1986. Councilwoman Hinkle stated she felt that because of the language barrier and the lack of presentation she felt it should be brought back up. I ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I July 28, 1986 Page 9 Councilman Ramsey stated if he had known that the original intention was to ask for another classification he would not have voted for the original zoning. Councilman Ramsey stated he hoped the Council would stand behind its original decision and deny rehearing the Ordinance. Motion carried 4-3; Councilwoman Hinkle, Councilmen Newman, Fisher and Garvin voting for; Councilwoman Moody, Mayor Pro Tem Davis, and Councilman Ramsey voting against. Councilman Newman stated he wanted to point out that he felt this case needed to be brought back because he did not feel the applicant received a fair chance to present his case before the Council. *12. GN 86-75 ORDINANCE REGULATING PAWNBROKERS, SECOND HAND DEALERS AND JUNK DEALERS - ORDINANCE NO. 1384 APPROVED 13. GN 86-76 APPROVING THE PAYING AGENT/REGISTRAR AGREEMENT WITH TEXAS AMERICAN BANK, FORT WORTH _ RESOLUTION NO. 86-33 APPROVED Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to approve Resolution No. 86-33. Motion carried 7-0. *14. GN 86-77 PROPOSED WRITE-OFF; DELINQUENT PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT APPROVED ~ ~. 15. GN 86-78 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF 1986 SERIES GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,000,000 - ORDINANCE NO. 1386 APPROVED Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, to approve GN 86-78. Motion carried 7-0. *16. GN 86-79 PROPOSED USE PUBLIC HEARING APPROVED I Ie I I I I I I I . I I II I I I I {' I July 28, 1986 Page 10 *17. GN 86-80 APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR POLICE STATION AND COMMUNITY CENTER/LIBRARY BUILDING APPROVED *18. PW 86-22 RATIFICATION OF PURCHASES OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR WATAUGA ROAD IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,000 TO KROGER COMPANY APPROVED 19. CITIZEN PRESENTATION Mr. Douglas Davis, 6204 Abbott, appeared before the Council. Mr. Davis stated he was a member of the Parks and Recreation Board. Mr. Davis stated that the Bah'i World Peace Movement had donated 120 trees to the Parks Department in their efforts to promote world peace. Mr. Davis stated that on July 19th the members of the Parks Board and the Mayor planted a ceremonial tree in Northfield Park. Mr. Davis expressed his gratitude to the Bah'i World Peace movement. Mr. Davis stated that vandals had already destroyed eight of these trees and that they had had numerous other problems with vandals in the City Parks. 20. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tem Davis moved, seconded by Councilman Newman, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 7-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development /"/86 _ Council Meeting Date: 8 11 Request of Chasewood Construction Company for Agenda Number: PZ 86-22 Modification to Approve R-I MF PD Site ~lan. Ordinance No. 1379 This Zoning Application is presented on the existing Multi-Family complex located on the north side of northeast Loop 820 between Reynolds Road and Thaxton Pkwy. The request of the applicant is for approval of a modification to the approved Planned Development Site Plan. In the original approval of the PD Site Plan which allowed the construction of the apartment complex the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council added a stipulation to the Site Plan requiring that a sight-barring fence of masonary construction be placed on the east and north boundaries of the project. The purpose of the solid fence was to screen the project from the adjacent school property. The Staff has on several occasions notified the applicant that the fence should be constructed. On the last notice the Staff proposed to begin removing electric meters from any vacant units and withhold occupancy until such time as the fence was constructed. The applicants responded that they did not wish to build masonary fence but would agree to the construction of a wooden fence. The Staff could not agree to this proposal without authorization from the City Council. This application is filed by the applicant to request the wooden fence be approved in lieu of the masonary fence. Also the applicant is requesting that the fence along the north property line be deleted all together. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the modification to the Site Plan to eliminate the masonary fence be denied. This hearing before the City Council is in appeal of that denial. : 1 : .!r ~, Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available 1<: 1fI~~ nt Head Signature I City anager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I t~> I R-7-MF I C-2 C-2 I Ie I ( Page 14 P & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 9. PZ 86-20 I I I I I I lit I I 10. PZ 86-22 I I I I I f I c Request of David Barfield to rezone portion of Lot 3R-1, Block 1, Mart Addition, from its present classification of AG (Agricu re) to R-2 (Single Family). This roperty is located on the north si of Nob Hill Drive, west of Preci Line Road. Chairman Bowen the Public Hearing and c led for those wishing to speak i favor of this request to please e forward. De ert Stembridge came forward to epresent Mr. Barfield. He said this lot would become a part of Nob Hill Addition. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-20. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 4-0. Request of The Chasewood Construction Company to rezone Lot 1, Block 12, Snow Heights North, A.ddit:lOI1, ::~~:)"m its present classification of R-7-MF-PD (Multi-Family-Planned Development) to R-7-MF-PD (Multi-Family-Planned Development) (Change of fence restriction). This property is located on the north side of Northeast Loop 820 (Quinten's Crossing Apartments). Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. I Page 15 ( p & Z Minutes ~ May 8, 1986 I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I c Tom Michaels, Vice President of The Chasewood Company, came forward. He said they are here to ask the removal of the fence restrictions along the north and east property line. He said they have 970 feet running north and south, 330 feet west of Reynolds Road. Mr. Michaels stated they did not own the property when it was zoned. He said they would like to put up a wooden fence along the east side of the property. Mr. Michaels said he had discussed this with Joe Bill Fox, Birdville ISD who owns the property next to Reynolds Road, and he has agreed to the wood fence. He said since there is a TESCO right-of-way between the apartments and Lewis Drive, they feel this is enough. Mr. Hallford asked what the school plans to do with the property. Mr. Michaels stated they plan to have a parking lot for the high school, but they will not pave it all the way to the property line. Chairman Bowen said he felt that nothing had changed since the Commission recommended the restriction. Mr. Michaels asked why the masonry fence. Chairman Bowen stated that was the only way they got to build the apartments that close to the high school. Mr. Michaels said it would cost approximately $67,000 instead of approximately $15,000. Mr. Schwinger said he also remembered that there were to be no breaks in the fence for security. I ~ I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I f I Page 16 P & Z Minutes May 8, 1986 ( PZ 86-22 DENIED 11. PZ 86-21 ( Mr. Michaels stated he felt the wood fence would provide adequate security. Mr. Hallford stated they agreed that if they would be allowed to build the apartments, they would build the masonry fence. Mr. Michaels read from the minutes of the City Council meeting. He said he was not aware of the masonry fence stipulation. He said he received a copy of the Ordinance and someone had typed in the stipulation about the fence just above the signatures. Mr. Royston stated that is where the stipulations are put. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Bowen stated that as far as he was concerned, he felt it should stay a part of the ordinance. He said he felt it was needed to separate the school from the apartments. Mr. Hallford made the motion to deny PZ 86-22. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion to deny carried 4-0. Consideration of Zoning Ordinance Chairman Bowe ed this was tabled from th st meeting. He said it was rding the sale of Alcoholic Beverages not having to have a Specific Use. Chairman Bowen stated that Mr. Royston has assured the Commission that they have the ability to control it. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I {' I ¡r '> ./ { t:.; KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas April 22, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-22 REVlEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-7-MF TO R-7-MF-PD REF. U T 1 L I TY S Y S T E r~1 G RID SHE E T NO. 121 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commisslon and the City Council. tI/~ ~ RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, Clty Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 86-22 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I It I I I I I I I f I . \ .. ( ( EXHIBIT IIAn BEING a portion of Lot 1, RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, according to plat filed in Volume 388-6, Page 49, Plat Records Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin for the Southwest corner of said Lot 1, said pin being-the intersection of the North line of Bedford-Euless Road with the East line of Strummer Drive, said pin also being the beginning of a curve to the left having a central angle of 14 28'28", a radius of 393.73 feet, and a tangent length of 50.00 feet; THENCE along said curve, an arc distance of 99.47 feet to an iron pin for its point of tangency; THENCE North 88 54'08" East, a distance of 194.76 feet to an iron pin for corner, said iron pin being in the North line of a tract of land deeded to the Texas Highway Department as recorded in Volume 3945, Page 119, Deed Records Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 37 47'48" West with the North line of said highway department tract a distance of 43.85 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE North 87 30'23" West. with the North line of said highway department tract a distance of 100.37 feet to an iron pin for corner; THENCE North 77 56'18" West with the North line of said highway department tract a distance of 100.40 feet to an iron pin for corner, said pin being also the West corner of said Texas Highway Department Tract and in the North line of Bedford-Euless Road; THENCE North 76 37'29" West a distance of 69.93 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 5,331 square feet or 0.1224 acre of land, more or less. I c:J Ie ....... Q) I ~ ~ I' I ~ t:J v1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ 3 I f ~ ~ ç: ~ - ~ c ~ ~ I ~ I C() ~; 10 ~i I ~ -4- I Û C ~=r I V) () í ~ I ~ I v Q, . 'I a .~ I I ~ ~ I ~I c2 ~ c: Co 1 ~I -- I ~ t: "Q!. ~ <::x> cr ~c.) V ~ I V) ... ~ ~ I ~: ~ ~ ~ c - I ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ c I --E V) r JJ \¡:t ~ ~¡ ~ N ~. ·1 " . . . I Ie I I I I I I I III I I I I I I -- I I ORDINANCE NO. 1379 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-22 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-7-MF-PD to R-7-MF-PD. BEING Lot 1, Block 12, Snow Heights North Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-163, Page 32 of the. Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located on the north side of Northeast Loop 820, west of Reynolds Road (Quinten's Crossing Apartments). DENIED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONI ?\ ,q~~~/r/7C PL ~~,"-;:'::"~'rcc~~~ - . ~ S~Y PLANNIÑG-:-Jd:-¡u TONING:;MMISS ION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-22 IS HEREBY REZONED THIS DAY OF 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 8/11/86 Council Meeting Date: Request of David Barfield to Rezone Tract 4, 4B, 4C and 4D, T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055 from AG to C-1. Ordinance No.1387 PZ 86-28 Agenda Number: This Zoning Application is presented on the existing residential and vacant property located on the northwest corner of Precinct Line Road and Martin Drive. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to C-1 Commercial. The applicants stated intent is to develop a commercial strip center on the site. The Staff noted to the Commission that the development of the subject tract will require that additional right of way be dedicated for the future improvement of Precinct Line Road. The applicant will also be required to construct his portion of the widened street or provide sufficient cash escrow funds to construct the street in the future. The City is proposing to reconstruct Martin Road in the near future. Additional right of way may be required in order to construct a controlled intersection and the applicant will be responsible for his portion of the street reconstruction costs. The area in which the rezoning request is located is currently small residential lots and undeveloped property. As noted the zoning is still agriculture. Until recently the Thoroughfare Plan designated Martin Drive as a major street which would have created a major street intersection at this location. With the revisions to the Thoroughfare Plan rè-routing Watauga Road this intersection will no longer be the traffic carrier previously envisioned. However, the ultimate improvements to Precinct Line Road will create a six lane Minor Arterial Thoroughfare adjacent to the subject tract. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-28 requesting rezoning on Tract 4, 4B, 4C, and 4D, T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055 from AG to C-l. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available efd~ City Manager , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 R-3 I 1090 I I I I AG , I , I I I ' \ \, \ , \ , " " \ ' R-3 \~ \ I FJ? , , I , I , , I I I I , I I I 1-' I , I I , I I I I .... \ , I u . I Ie I I I I I ( ( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, JULY 10, 1986 - 7:30 P. M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Don Bowen, at 7:30 P. M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Secretary Members Alt. Members Don Bowen John Schwinger Mark Wood Marjorie Nash George Tucker Carole Flippo Richard Royston Wanda Calvert Dir. Planning/Dev. p & Z Coordinator I I lit ABSENT: Joe Hallford CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF JUNE 26, 1986 Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve the minutes as written. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 3-0 with Mr. Wood, Ms. Flippo, and Ms. Nash abstaining since they were not present at the meeting. I I I I I I I f I 1. PZ 86-28 Request of David Barfield to rezone Tracts 4, 4B, 4C, & 4D, T. K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, from their present classification of AG Agriculture to C-1 Commercial. This property is located at the northwest corner of Precinct Line Road and Martin Road. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Barfield came forward. He stated he is one of the owners and he represents the other owners of the property. He said there were several tracts involved because they did not want it to be spot zoning. Mr. Barfield said he wanted this to be an addition to the Nob Hill Addition to the north of the said property. He said he hopes to acquire all the land from Amundson to Martin Road for Nob Hill. I Page 2 ( P & Z Minutes ~ July 10, 1986 I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I ( Mr. Barfield said they plan to build a brick wall in front of this shopping area to match Nob Hill, but it would only be about 30 inches high. He said they need the commercial zoning for a shopping center. He said it was commercial on the Hurst side, but the North Richland Hills residents have no place to shop in our city. Mr. Barfield stated he feels there is a definite need for a shopping center. He said Precinct Line Road is planned for a 6 lane thoroughfare and another thoroughfare is planned to the south of Martin and there should not be any residences between Martin and this road. Mr. Barfield stated there is no Commercial zoning along Precinct Line Road on the North Richland Hill's side, but there is Commercial zoning along Precinct Line Road on the Hurst side. He said as he develops property along Precinct Line Road they will build the road. Mr. Barfield said he hopes to make this shopping center look similar to the Ridglea Shopping Center. He said he would like to have restaurant pad sites along Precinct Line Road and the shopping center across the back. Mr. Barfield said he felt this would be a nice addition to the 'city and he has not found any objections from the neighbors. Joan Rice, 2900 Pool, Grapevine, TX, came forward. She said she owns one half acre of this request and she would like their part zoned Commercial. She said she is not a part of the joint venture. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. Foy Moss, 752 Spring Valley, Hurst, came forward. He said he is opposed to this rezoning. He said John Evans owns 16 acres of commercial and Herman Smith owns 30 acres of commercially zoned land and we don't need any more. " I Page 3 ( P & Z Minutes ~ July 10, 1986 I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I ( Mr. Moss stated he felt they should wait to zone anything commercial until Precinct Line Road is fixed. He said he could not see extra traffic along that road. He also stated there was a flooding problem in this area. Chairman Bowen stated that would be taken care of in the platting process. He said if they could not meet the city's platting requirements, then they could not build. Mr. Moss stated he was concerned with all that could be put in Commercial zoning. He read out of the zoning ordinance some of the things that could be in Commercial zoning. He said he lives across the street and was concerned that there might be a high rise building put there. Mr. Moss said he could be looking at a 10 story building there. Mr. Moss asked when Precinct Line Road would be widened and asked if Nob Hill Addition was on hold or if they were under construction. Mr. Royston stated Nob Hill is not on hold and it is under construction. Mr. Moss asked if the Commission would require them to have a plat prior to the zoning of the property. Chairman Bowen stated the property had to be zoned before it could be platted. Mr. Moss stated that W. A. Porter Elementary school is at the corner of Spring Valley and Precinct Line Road and he felt the traffic would be bad for the parents bringing and picking up their children. Bob Curry, 6517 Valley View Drive, came forward. I Page 4 ( P & Z Minutes Ie July 10, 1986 I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I {' I ( Mr. Curry stated he lives a block from the property in question. He said he would not like to have a high rise office building there and he does not want another Rufe Snow. He said he previously lived in Watauga and Rufe Snow was a small street and after it was widened they started building businesses and restaurants and now you can not get down it for the traffic. Mr. Curry said there is lots of commercial going in on the Hurst side. He said he would like to put a hold on this request and let other people know about this request. Mr. Curry said he had talked to the Mayor and he was not in favor of what was going on. Ms. Nash asked Mrs. Calvert how many were contacted. Mrs. Calvert stated there were 7 plus the City of Hurst. Mr. Curry stated they did not need any apartments there. Chairman Bowen stated the apartment zoning has been zoned that for years, but it is a small area. Mr. 'Curry asked how he could get this request stopped. He said he felt they should be required to have a plat. Mr. Tucker stated the Planning and Zoning Commission is only a recommending body to the City Council, only the City Council can grant zoning. He said you can also speak your wishes to the City Council. Mr. Curry asked if he needed to come with more people. Mr. Tucker said he could do however he wants to. Chairman Bowen stated our ordinance does not require a drawing for a zoning request. I Page 5 p & Z Minutes July 10, 1986 ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I PZ 86-28 APPROVED ( ( Chairman Bowen stated that any citizen could go to the City Council meeting and speak. He said they have a Citizen's Presentation at the end of every agenda. Don Turnbull, 744 Springhill Drive, Hurst, came forward. He said normally, the City of Hurst notifies them of zoning requests in their area. He said he lives across the street from Nob Hill and the Multi-Family zoned property. He said the Commercial zoning request bothers him because of the traffic. He said he lives 3 houses from Precinct Line Road and the Tarrant Appraisal District increased the value of his property one third more, but with Commercial going in it will decrease in value. Mr. Turnbull said he likes the Agricultural zoning with the horses. He said he had rather leave it like it is or go with single family. Chairman Bowen stated the Agriculture is only a holding zoning. Mr. Turnbull said he knows it will go something else, but would prefer single family rather than Multi-Family or Commercial. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood asked Ms. Rice if her property was included in this zoning request. Ms. Rice said it is a part of this request, but she is not a part of the Joint Venture. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-28. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 4-1 with Ms. Nash voting against. I Ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I ( \. KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas June 16, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Z ON I NG CASE PZ 86-28 RE VI EW LETTER, ZONING FROM AG TO C-1 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 81 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning ~~p as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enc 1 os ure s cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Publ ic Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 86 -28 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I ORDINANCE NO. 1387 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-28 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to C-1. BEING a 7.216 acre tract out of the T.K. Martin Survey, Abstract 1055, in Tarrant County, Texas and described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod in the west R.O.W. line of Precinct Line Road (#3035), said iron rod being the northeast corner of a tract as recorded in Volume 3293, page 553, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and said iron rod also being 2808.33 feet north and 23 feet west from the original southeast corner of the T.K. Martin Survey; THENCE South 00 degrees 03 minutes 01 seconds East a distance of 736.52 feet with the west R.O.W. line of said County Road to an iron rod in the north R.O.W. line of Martin Road, for a corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 33 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 422.60 feet with the north R.O.W. line óf Martin Road to an iron rod for a corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 27 minutes 11 seconds West a distance of 741.92 feet to an iron rod for a corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 43 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 427.81 feet to the point of beginning and containing 314,312 square feet or 7.216 acres of land, more or less. I '- I I I I I I I It I I I I I I I f I Page 2 This property is located at the northwest corner of Precinct Line Road and Martin Road. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 10th DAY OF JULY, 1986. ~á!~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION " ~ OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-28 IS HEREBY REZONED C-1 THIS 11th DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 8/11/86 - Council Meeting Date: Request of Frank Lynch to Rezone a Portion of Tract 5, Ag nda Number" PZ 86-30 S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266 from AG and C-l to-R-~ . Ordinance No. 1388 This Zoning Application is presented on a portion of the vacant tract located on the north side of Green Valley Drive west of Davis Boulevard and east of the Green Valley Site. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-3 Single Family Residential. The purpose for the proposed rezoning is to allow the development of the subject tract into a single family subdivision. The Staff noted to the Commission that this tract in a slightly different configuration was proposed earlier for development as a zero-lot-line single family project. That rezoning request was denied by the City Council. The current request is a replacement for that earlier request. In each of the cases involving these properties the Staff has pointed,out that the extension and development of Bursey as a four lane Collector Street is a requirement. The applicant has submitted a preliminary plat layout which shows the extension of Bursey Road through his site. However, the proposed location in the applicants property does not match up with the proposed development of the Green Valley tract site to the west. Prior to the approval of any plats the development of the two tracts will have to be coordinated to provide a continuous right of way for Bursey Road. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-30 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract 5, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266 from AG to R-3. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget o r Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM t 1{/~ I City Manager , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I , I Page 7 P & Z Minutes July 10, 1986 ( ( PZ 86-29 DENIED Mr. Schwinger made PZ 86-29. This mo · Ms. Nash. rman Bowen stated that he agrees with this motion. He said he could not see affirming the request on speculation. He said if they had a firm plan, he might consider it. The motion for denial carried 5-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together, but voted on separately. 3. PZ 86-30 Request of Frank Lynch to rezone a portion of Tract 5, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from its present classifications of AG Agriculture and C-I Commercial to R-3 Single Family. This property is located north of Green Valley Drive and west of Davis Boulevard. 4. PZ 86-31 Request of Frank Lynch to rezone a portion of Tract 5, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located north of Green Valley Drive and west of Davis Boulevard. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Dick Perkins with Teague NaIl & Perkins, Inc. came forward. He said they had been before this Commission several times on this property. He said they had a combination of R-3 and R-8 zoning which was denied by the City Council. He said the City Council wants R-2 and R-3 so he does not feel they should have a problem with the City Council. I Page 8 ( \ P & Z Minutes ~ July 10, 1986 I I I I I I PZ 86-30 I APPROVED - PZ 86-31 APPROVED I 5. PZ 86-32 I I I I I I , I Mr. Perkins stated there is a 20 foot wide strip of C-l that is a part of the R-3 request. He said there is C-l to the east, Multi-Family to the north and R-1 to the west of these requests. Mr. Perkins stated they had opposition from the Green Valley Homeowners Association previously, but feel these requests are okay for all involved. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-30. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 86-31. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Marvin D. Smith to rezone Lot 9, Block 4, Maroaks Addition, f its present classification of R- Duplex to R-2 Single Family. his property is located at t southwest corner of Lincoln Dri and Spring Lea Way. Chairman n opened the Public Hearin called for those wishing to eak in favor of this request to ease come forward. Mr. Smith came forward. He said this is a corner lot adjacent to duplex zoning. He said you used to be allowed to build single family in duplex zoning, but that has been changed. Mr. Smith said he plans to build a 2200 or 2250 square foot single family home on this lot. He showed an aerial view of the area. He said he plans to build other homes 2400 to 2500 square feet in the area. I Ie I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I I' I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas June 30, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-30 REVIE~J LETTER, ZONING FROM lAG & C-l I TO R-3 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 43 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. aJl (ß. ~ RW AI r a Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Publ ic vJorks Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zon i ng Rev i ew PZ 86 -30 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I -- I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I r I ORDINANCE NO. 1388" AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-30 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG and C-1 to R-3. BEING a tract of land out of the Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at a 1 inch iron rod found being the southwest corner of Tract A, Cherokee Estates, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-68, Page 19, Tarrant County Plat Records; THENCE along the easterly boundary of that property owned by B. H. & L. Joint Venture under Volume 8300, Page 774, South 00 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 399.22 feet; THENCE leaving said boundary South 61 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds East 159.84 feet to the true point of beginning; THENCE continuing South 61 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds East 1022.44 feet to a non-tangent curve having a ~adius of 2427.43 feet, thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 24 degrees 10 minutes 37 seconds an arc length of 1024.30 feet to a point, said point being on a curve whose radius is 834.00 feet; THENCE continuing along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 18 degrees 13 minutes 07 seconds an arc length of 265.19 feet to a non-tangent point having a radial bearing of South 25 degrees 08 minutes 52 seconds West; THENCE leaving said curve South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 778.58 feet to a point on the northerly R.O.W. line of Green Valley Drive; THENCE along said northerly R.O.W. line North 89 degrees 15 minutes 12 seconds West a distance of 229.98 feet; THENCE leaving said R.O.W. line North 00 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds East a distance of 1958.71 feet; I -- I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I r I Page 2 THENCE North 61 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds West 16.41 feet to a tangent 250-foot radius curve, thence northwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 27 degrees 42 minutes 11 seconds an arc length of 120.88 feet to a point of non-tangency on said curve having a radial bearing of North 01 degree Ilminutes 11 seconds East; THENCE Leaving said curve North 00 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 175.43 feet to the true point of beginning and containing 20.8683 acres (909,024 square feet) of land, more or less. AND- COMMENCING at a 1 inch iron rod found being the southwest corner of Tract A, Cherokee Estates, and addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-68, Page 19, Tarrant County Plat Records; THENCE along the easterly boundary of lthat property owned by B. H. & L. Joint Venture per Volume 8300, Page 774, South 00 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds East for a distance of 2,646.05 feet to a point on the northerly R.O.W. line of Green Valley Drive; THENCE along said northerly R.O.W. line South 89 degrees 15 minutes 12 seconds East a distance of 500.00 feet to the true point of beginning; THENCE leaving said northerly R.O.W. line North 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East 778.58 feet to a point of a non-tangent 834-foot radius curve, thence southeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 01 degrees 55 minutes 35 seconds an arc length of 28.04 feet to a point on said curve having a radial bearing of South 22 degrees 13 minutes 17 seconds West; THENCE leaving said curve South 00 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds West 767.42 feet to a point on the northerly R.O.W. line of Green Valley Drive; THENCE westerly along said R.O.W. line North 89 degrees 15 minutes 12 seconds West 25.04 feet to the true point of beginning and containing 0.4491 acres (19,563 square feet) of land, more or less. I -- I I I I I I I . 'I I I I I I I r I Page 3 This property is located north of Green Valley Drive and west of Davis Boulevard. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 10th DAY OF JULY, 1986. CHA ~ ~ OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-30 IS HEREBY REZONED R-3 THIS 11th DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. MAYOR . CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY': ATTORNEY I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 8/11/86 Council Meeting Date: Request of Frank Lynch to Rezone a Portion of Tract 5, Agenda Number: PZ 86-31 S. Richardson Survey, Abstract llóó, trom Aü to K-2 Ordinance No. 1389 This Zoning Application is presented on the remainder of the vacant tract located on the north side of Green Valley Drive west of Davis Boulevard and east of the Green Valley Site. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential. The applicant indicates that their plan is to develop the property into single family lots. The applicant has submitted a preliminary plat layout of the proposed residential subdivision. The City Council will recall that this property was previously requested for R-2 zoning in slightly different configuration. At that time the applicant also had a request in for the adjacent tract to be zoned R-8 Zero-Lot-Line Single Family. When the City Council denied the R-8 request the applicant withdrew the R-2 request in order to re-configure his development plan. The R-2 request has been reduced in size slightly and the remainder of the applicants property is contained in the'R-3 request under consideration in Zoning Application PZ 86-30. As stated in PZ 86-30 the alignment of Bursey Road as it traverses this tract must be coordinated with the development of the adjacent properties to assure a continuous alignment of the improved street. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-31 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract 5, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from AG to R-2. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available e1L.l~ I Citr'Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . FInance Director Page 1 of 1 I AG AG I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I . " Page 7 p & Z Minutes July 10, 1986 ( () PZ 86-29 DENIED Mr. Schwinger made PZ 86-29. This mo · Ms. Nash. rman Bowen stated that he agrees with this motion. He said he could not see affirming the request on speculation. He said if they had a firm plan, he might consider it. The motion for denial carried 5-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together, but· voted on separately. 3. PZ 86-30 Request of Frank Lynch to rezone a portion of Tract 5, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from its present classifications of AG Agriculture and C-l Commercial to R-3 Single Family. This property is located north of Green Valley Drive and west of Davis Boulevard. 4. PZ 86-31 Request of Frank Lynch to rezone a portion of Tract 5, S. Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located north of Green Valley Drive and west of Davis Boulevard. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Dick Perkins with Teague NaIl & Perkins, Inc. came forward. He said they had been before this Commission several times on this property. He said they had a combination of R-3 and R-8 zoning which was denied by the City Council. He said the City Council wants R-2 and R-3 so he does not feel they should have a problem with the City Council. I' Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I" I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas June 30, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N. E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PI 86-31 REVIE~J LETTER, ZONING FRO~1 AG TO R-¿ REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 43 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Corrmission and the City Council. &avP W, ÚIL RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RW AI r a En c 1 0 sure s cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager t4r. Gene Riddle, Director of Publ ic ~Jorks Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zon; ng Rev; ew PZ 86 -31 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 · ~ - .........-.. I I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I Ie I I ORDINANCE NO. 1389 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: . RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-31 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. BEING a tract of land out of the Stephen Richardson Survey, Abstract 1266, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: COMMENCING at a 1 inch iron rod found being the southwest corner of Tract A, Cherokee Estates, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas as recorded in Volume. 388-68, Page 19, Tarrant County Plat Records; THENCE along the easterly boundary of that property owned by B. H. & L. Joint Venture per Volume 8300, Page 774, South 00 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds West for a distance of 399.22 feet to the true point of beginning; THENCE leaving said easterly boundary South 61 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds East a distance of 159.84 feet; ~ 1 : , It ' THENCE parallel to and 140 feet west of s~id'~~sterly boundary South 00 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds West 175.43 feet to a point on a non-tangent 250-foot radius curve, thence southeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 27 degrees 42 minutes 11 seconds an arc length of 120.88 feet; THENCE tangent to said curve South 61 degrees 06 minutes 38 seconds East a distance of 16.41 feet; THENCE parallel to said easterly boundary line South 00 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 1,958.71 feet to a point on the northerly R.O.W. line of Green Valley Drive; THENCE westerly along said northerly R.O.W. line North 89 degrees 15 minutes 12 seconds West a distance of 270.02 feet to a point on the easterly boundary of lthe B. H. & L. Joint Venture line; THENCE along said boundary line North 00 degrees 02 minutes 25 seconds East a distance of 2246.83 feet to the true point of beginning and containing 13.0200 acres (567,151 square feet) of land, more or less. (,. . '- I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 This property is located north of Green Valley Drive and west of Davis Boulevard. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 10th DAY OF JULY, 1986. CHA BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-31 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 11th DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS , ~, APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: 8/11/86 Council Meeting Date: Request of Marvin D. Smith to Rezone Lot 9, Block 4, Maroaks Addition from R-~-D to R-Z Ordinance No. 1390 PZ 86-32 Agenda Number: This Zoning Application is presented on an existing undeveloped duplex lot on the southwest corner of Lincoln Drive and Spring Lea Drive. The requested rezoning is from R-5-D Duplex to R-2 Single Family Residential. The applicant wishes to build a single family residence on the remaining lot in this block of existing duplexes. The existing lot proposed for rezoning will meet all of the minimum requirements of the R-2 District. Although the block in which the subject lot is situated is developed with duplexes the surrounding property facing and to the rear of the subject lot is all single family residential property. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-32 requesting rezoning on Lot 9, Block 4, Maroaks Addition from R-5-D to R-2. . þ . It , I ~ Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget o r Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I I R 11l~~ City Manager , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM PaQe 1 of 1 I IIÞ I I I I AG --.1L c-r ..J:;¡ . . ... C I -- I I Page 8 P & Z Minutes July 10, 1986 I I I I I , PZ 86-30 .. APPROVED I 5. PZ 86-32 I I I I I , I I c (t.í Mr. Perkins stated there is a 2 wide strip of C-1 that is a rt of the R-3 request. He said ere is C-1 to the east, Multi-Fam to the north and R-l to the west these requests. Mr. Perkins state they had opposition from the Green alley Homeowners Association reviously, but feel these requests re okay for all involved. Ch an Bowen called for those shing to speak in opposition to these requests to please come forward! There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-30. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 86-31. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Marvin D. Smith to rezone Lot 9, Block 4, Maroaks Addition, from its present classification of R-5-D Duplex to R-2 Single Family. This property is located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Drive and Spring Lea Way. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Smith came forward. He said this is a corner lot adjacent to duplex zoning. He said you used to be allowed to build single family in duplex zoning, but that has been changed. Mr. Smith said he plans to build a 2200 or 2250 square foot single family home on this lot. He showed an aerial view of the area. He said he plans to build other homes 2400 to 2500 square feet in the area. I Ie I I I I I I I , ~ 6. PZ 86-33 I I I I I I /~/ ,/ I I Page 9 p & Z Minutes July 10, 1986 (0,- \ PZ 86-32 APPROVED ( Mr. Smith said he is interested in what goes in in this area because he lives there. He said he plans to buy an acre or an acre and a half from his father and build a 7900 square foot house for himself. He said he plans to live here all his life. Mr. Smith show the Commission the plans for the house he plans to build on this lot. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-32. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Esprit Investments to rezone Tract 4, W. D. Barnes Surve , Abstract 146, from its present classification of AG Agric ure to R-2 Single Family. Th property is located on the nort side of Starnes Road, west of R Oak Drive. Chairma owen opened the Public Hea · g and called for those wishing speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mike Garrett with Esprit Investments came forward. He stated this is an "L" shaped piece left out of the Kingswood Estates area which is R-2 zoning. Mr. Garrett said they wish the same zoning. He said they would have lots ranging from 9000 to 14,000 square feet. I lit I I I I I I I , I I I I I I l- I I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas June 30, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-32 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM R-5-D TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 50 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Corrmission and the City Council. Our map has the name of the street on the east as Spring Lea Way. w,~ P. E. RW AI ra En closures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Publ ic Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zon i ng Rev i ew PZ 86 -32 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 ? L/NCO¿N .,.:S-o ~ ~O. w. - ~Æ'/v£ Â.s Ph'. ." ,9 8..z ?D s:,.Z --- r Æ '9 ,...¡r. Ji _ ~ ~ "f ~ }~ Q~ q~ ~I ~ I~ ~ I I~ \~ ~ ~ ,. ~~ , ~ ~ ~ 0. o QI ~I .. , , '\¡ 9 ~D1' oc1< ,,2J~ ~ N --- ---- ---- - - --..-.. - - -~-- /.o~ c!!./r/J /ry £ .s /"? 7: --- 9" :1_0 PLAT OF LOT 9, BLOCK 4, MAROAKS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TARRANT COUNTY ,1'EXAS, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 388-172, PAGE 28, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS NO ENCROACHMENTS OTHER THAN SHOWN LEGEND .,e. .1..~*.~..f¡.._.. . . ~-:.. "'.~ , £_~.,. . ".'1 . ... . . *' o I RO N PIP E . . ..: . _ . . .. . .. .. . . . . . . :. . . ., l:1 BOtS Q'ARC STAKE' LOVC BRANSOM I ,. · . : ' · · · · · · · · · · · · , · . ", ··f C CONCRETE MON .-0'., 953 :., .~'. · '0-.. -X-X- FENCE . ~'..!., "t..~...~ f -11-11- POWER L.INE "~!j·SÜ~. -T-T- TELEPHONE LINE · .. . IRON PIN LOYD BRANSOM SURVEYORS INC. t.. OFt REGISTERED PUBLIC SURVEYOR ~~..~.~~.,,,, 1 028 NORTH SYLVANIA AVE. .~., W \. * FT. W 0 R T H, T E X A S 7 6 J J J ........................... 834 - 3477 CHAlIt.tM 8. HOOAS. JR. I DO HEREBYCERTI FY TH AT THI S MAP f 5 TRU E a CORRECT AS SURVEYED ON THE: GROUND. (~¿JÆj~.A 86-1047 DATE 6-9-86 I -- I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I " I ORDINANCE NO. 1390 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-32 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-5-D to R-2. BEING Lot 9, Block 4, Maroaks Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-172, Page 28, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Drive and Spring Lea Way. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONI ~ SE4"LANNINhMUJ l.~~N BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-32 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 11th DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. ATTEST: MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: Council Meeting Date: Request of Esprit Investments to Rezone 7.64 Acres A~ d N b PZ 86-33 out of the W.D. Barnes Survey, Abstract 146 from AG 1:0 "R[f2n a urn er: Ordinance No. 1391 8/11/86 This Zoning Application is presented on the undeveloped tract located on the north side of Starnes Road west of Red Oak Drive and east and north of Kingswood Court. The requested rezoning is from AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family Residential. The purpose for the requested rezoning is to allow the property to be developed into a residential subdivision. In reviewing the request the Staff noted two items for Commission consideration. 1) The subject property is an ilL" shaped tract running north and west from Starnes Road. The configuration of the property leaves very few options as to the final development pattern. There will, by necessity, be a cul-de-sac constructed with a tier of lots on either side. The cul-de-sac will exceed the optimum length preferred by the Staff and the Fire Department. The Staff has suggested that the applicants contact the owner of the tract immediately west of the subject property, which is currently under construction, to see if any realignment can be designed which would provide a second outlet to the property. 2) In the survey of the subject tract a 25 foot strip was revealed which is not a part of the subject tract nor is it associated with the developed Kingswood Subdivision to the north, but is located between the two properties. Apparently at some earlier land transaction in the area this 25 foot strip was held out as an access reserve or for some other use. With the development of this tract and the tracts to the West this strip will be completely "land-locked" and unusable. The Staff suggested to the developers that they explore the possibility of acquiring this trip and incorporating it into their design to eliminate the "land-locked" parcel. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approy~¡ of Zoning Application PZ 86-33 ;'j requesting rezoning of a 7.64 acre parcel out of the W.D. Barnes Survey, Abstract 146, from AG to R-2. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available t Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM r2~~ I City anager , Finance Director Page 1 of -L__ R-2 I Ie I I R-2 AG AG ~-3 -- I , I Ie I I I I I I I lit I I I I I I -- I I Page 9 P & Z Minutes July 10, 1986 6. PZ 86-33 (- (, Mr. Smith said he is interested i what goes in in this area beca e lives there. He said he p s to buy an acre or an acre and alf from his father and build a 7 square foot house for himself He said he plans to live here his life. show the Commission the pIa for the house he plans to build this lot. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-32. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Esprit Investments to rezone Tract 4, W. D. Barnes Survey, Abstract 146, from its present classification of AG Agriculture to R-2 Single Family. This property is located on the north side of Starnes Road', west of Red Oak Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mike Garrett with Esprit Investments came forward. He stated this is an "L" shaped piece left out of the Kingswood Estates area which is R-2 zoning. Mr. Garrett said they wish the same zoning. He said they would have lots ranging from 9000 to 14,000 square feet. I Ie I I I I I I I lit I I I I I I -- I I Page 10 P & Z Minutes July 10, 1986 PZ 86-33 APPROVED ADJOURNMENT (~ ( Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-33. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:20 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I -- I I ( ( KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas June 30, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-33 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM AS TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 51 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. RWA/ra Enc los ures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Publ ic Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoni ng Review PZ 86 -33 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 , -.. ~ - .~ - - , - I, . I ~ . " , I ".... . . t' (III" . ",tt. ~. tI' "......~ , . . ,.~". . , N " ".... . .' I" a .. '. . , , (.....y~. R... - -1) -....... ..-.-....... -. .- ~._-.. . I ~ ............. . . . .. r ' .. . I' . ' , .. . , . . . . . ' . , . . lei.. 7.6,. .ø.. ., 1'" ., .f. be V. D. IA_' -.ra. fuTM, 0...,. ....... ~r1_. .., ..... ... ~c1. .. ten..... ' . -DQ.t .. irea Pi. 660~' r.., 10... o..".....~, ..... ..., uI m.O f.., ... . t ,be ....hMn ..rur .f J. c.tl'l au.w.. ,bnl'H' M. ~l . E!"I IeuUa 0 ........."........ .... 2&5.0 r.., .. ina pia r.,. ....... ' I..t 375.0 t., .. in. Pia t.r ..I'DeI" .... 0 ..........., ...... W... ,.,,5.0 ,..,... 11''' Pi. t. ....... ia .. ..,... 11 . .t CM_'" ~ ... ~'9 . ' , ,.. .. ~ ' . E: aa., 81... 'b. ..n.. li.. .t c.u'F ... ~.o I..".. in. tia I. . ....... I .nk 0 ........~, Id.... San '~o.o I., .. 11'0. pia I. ..n.r. V.., 1~O.O I.,'.. ,. pe1., .t "¥1~1" ..11 .....1at.. 7.'. ...... of la.... .1._- _. .__. _., ._ '_. _ \ I· . . -1 ", .. . .... .~.. .. .... '.. ---. .' .,.............. .. Thi. i. to certify thaf -e marked the corner. QI Ihown above. The location of Imprav....ent. are 01 shown. the eaaemenh and building Iin.. ar. CIa th.y appear on said map at record and . ther. are no viaible . encroachments exceP,t 01 lhown. . Scale I: nOt. WEND~LL 'HANCOCK 0 _____ liON ~~: re,i,t.red public .urveyor 110. 1326 .X.X .._....... fENCE T& 4-oa43 4\ ..-..--.... 101$ D'Me SJAW 15144 . BAST BELKNAP .TREaT ·T·E _._..... UTILITY UNI FORT WORTH. TEXAS 78117 +s --........ SANITAlY SEWEI " " I" ~~ ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I r I ORDINANCE NO. 1391 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-33 the following described property shall be rezoned from AG to R-2. BEING 7.64 acres of land out of the W. D. Barnes Survey, Tarrant County, Texas and described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin 660.4 feet South 00 degrees 49 minutes West and 375.0 feet East of the Northeast corner of J. Condra Survey, Abstract 311; THENCE South 00 degrees 49 minutes West 265.0 feet to iron pin for corner; THENCE East 375.0 feet to iron pin for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 49 minutes West 375.0 feet to iron pin for corner in the North line of County Road No. 3039; THENCE East along the North line of County Ro~d 365.0 feet to iron pin for a corner; . ~.' THENCE North 00 degrees 49 minutes East 640.0 feet to iron pin for corner; THENCE West 740.0 feet to the point of beginning and containing 7.64 acres of land. 1_ ~t Ie I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I , I Page 2 This property is located on the north side of Starnes Road, west of Red Oak Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 10th DAY OF JULY, 1986. C 4e~ SECRET Y PLANNING ArID -NING O~IISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-33 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 11th DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS . þ . II 11 , APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 8/11/86 Department: Council Meeting Date: Request of Diamond Shamrock Corporation for Replat A d N b PS 86-33 of Lots l-R-A and l-R-B, Parker's Subdìvìs10n. gen a urn er: I This Replat Application is presented for consideration of Lots l-R-A and l-R-B, Parker's Subdivision. The property is located on the northwest corner of Grapevine Highway and Scruggs Drive. The property is currently zoned C-l Commercial and has an existing Shamrock Service Station on site. The purpose for the proposed replat is to realign the lot lines to correspond with the existing ownership lines. The applicants wish to re-construct the existing service station to include a convenience store. The replat was necessary in order to obtain a building permit. All of the Engineer's comments have been satisfactorily answered. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Replat Application PS 86-33 on Lots l-R-A and l-R-B, Parker's Subdivision as submitted. ~ , !I It., Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget o r Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I .. tC-1tL/~ City Manager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I o I Page 6 P & Z Minutes July 24, 1986 I 3. PS 86-30 I I I I I I . I 4. PS 86-33 I PS 86-33 APPROVED I I ADJOURNMENT I I ( ."" r \ Request of B. H. & L. Joint for preliminary plat of The Addition, Section 3. Chairman Bowen said h as a question about the streets ubbing out on this plat. He said would like to see something in iting from the adjacent property saying this is agreea · Long said they have a written working agreement with the property owner which expires some time this year. He said they both would have odd-even lots. Mr. Long said the property owner does not have her zoning approved yet. He said he would make a copy available to the Commission. Mr. Tucker made the motion to approve PS 86-30 subject to the City Engineer's comments. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Diamond Shamrock Corp. for replat of Lots l-RA & l-RB, Parkers Subdivision. Mr. ~chwinger'made the motion to approve PS 86-33. This motion was seconded by Mr. Hallford and the motion carried 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:20 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I I ¡r" ( P.R. ENGINEERING, INC. ( ... Ie 530 BEDFORD RD.. SUITE 150 · I I I I I I I . I I I I I I BEDFORD" 1.EXAS 76022 · 817-268-5111 July 15, 1986 Planning & Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 Northeast Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Tx 76118 RE: Parkers Subdivision Lots l-RA and l-RB Replat Gentlemen: In reference to the letter from Knowlton-English-Flowers, Inc., acting City Engineer for the City of North Richland Hills, dated June 20, 1986, the following is our reply to the comments they made. // / 1. The owners' acknowledgment and dedication has been executed. 2. We have been advised that City of North Richland Hills will contact all utility companies. 3. The plat has been signed and sealed. 4. Name, address, and telephone number of the owners has been shown. 5. The bearing on the south line of Lot l-RA has been corrected. 6. The statement which you asked be added after the metes and bounds has been executed. ~ 7. The title block is shown "Lots l-RA & I-ftRB, Parkers' subdivision, being a replat of Lot l-R, Parkers' subdivision". 8. The portion of the utility easement that we proposed to be abandoned has been dotted. 9. Our drainage study shows there is no existing drainage problem. Attached you will find a topographic map of the area, which shows the site will not have off-site water draining through it. We appreciate your concern on this matter and if you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to call me. SITY' DON PEEBLES, P.E. President I /kp Enclosure I· ie I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I ( ( KNOWLTON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas June 20, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-916, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PARKERS SUBDIVISION, LOTS l-RA AND l-RB, REPLAT, PS 86 - 33, GRID MAP 157 We have reviewed the referenced materials for this subdivision and offer the following comments: 1 The Owner1s Acknowledgement and Dedication Statement and the Notary Certification should be fully executed before approval of this plat. 2 All utility companies should be advised of this proposed replat in accordance with standard City procedures. 3 A surveyor1s seal and signature should be affixed to the certification on the plat. 4 The name, address and telephone number of the owners should be shown. 5 The bearing on the south line of Lot 1-RA is different on the plat from the metes and bounds decription. 6 This statement should be addéd after the metes and bounds description: lIand designated herein as Lots 1-RA and 1-RB Parker1s subdivts'îon to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, and whose name is subscribed hereto, hereby dedicate to the use of the public forever all streets, alleys, parks, water courses, drains, easements, rights-of-way and public places thereon shown for the purpose and consideration therein expressedll. 7 The title block should indicate IILots l-RA and l-RB, Parker1s subdivision, being a replat of Lot 1-R, Parker1s subdivisionll. 8 What portion of the utility easement along the west of this platting is to be abandoned? 9 We are not aware of any existing drainage problems associated with this proposed development, and the topographic data shown on the City tapa maps are not sufficiently detailed to reveal any potential problems. We have not been furnished any other topo data or site grading plan as required to evaluate the impact of proposed construction on drainage in the area. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I· · Ie I 1 1 1 1 I 1 . I 1 I I I I I :' · Subdivision Review Le(¿r continued PARKERS SUBDIVISION ( 10 As a general reminder, the Developer or Owner should be made aware that he is responsible for all provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordi nance, Water and Sewer Pol ic i es and Proced ures, and all other applicable City Development Codes unless specific discretionary variances and exceptions are made and agreed upon by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, and covered in writing in the City-Developer Agreement, if this proposed plat is approved. If no such specific variances are provided then the Developer or Owner remains responsible for all other Ordinance and Policy requirements as written in the regulatory cod e s . Please call if you have any questions. RW AI ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development June 20, 1986 PS 86 - 33 PAGE 2 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration . . 8/11/86 Council Meeting Date: GN 86-81 Agenda Number: Subject: Appointments to Various Boards & Commissions I I On July 2, 1986 David Phelps resigned from the Civil Service Commission and on July 16, 1986 Nancy Gum resigned from the Cable Television Board. Appointments need to be made to fill these positions. Council also needs to make an appointment to fill the vacancy of an alternate on the Board of Appeals. This vacancy was created when the alternate was made a voting member. Recommendation: Appoint members to the Civil Service Commission, Cable Television Board and an Alternate to the Board of Appeals. ~ I I I , , , I I ~ i ~ Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I R Já7:e Department Head Signature I City ~~~r CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 .. I Ie I I I 1 1 I 1 . I I 1 I I I I it' I July 16, 1986 North Richland Hills Cable Television Board P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Members: It is with much regret that I resign my cItIzen posItIOn on this board. Previ- ous personal commitments on Tuesdays will not allow me to attend any fur- ther meetings. - I have enjoyed watching our cable facilities grow and expand over the years and have been very -proud to be a small part of this growth. There seems to be a never ending group of citizens willing to give their time and expertise to the growth of this board and I have been very fortu- nate to have known and to have learned so much from what each has had to offer. My thanks to all and good wishes on your continued growth. Sincerely, q{~~ Nancy T. Gum þ . . ., I I I 1 1 I I a> I I I I I I I , I RELIANCE" CCMM/TEC .. R- TEC Systems 2100 Reliance Parkway Bedford, TX 76021 817-267-3141 July 2, 1986 Dan Echols, Mayor City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 18607 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Dear Mayor Echols: It is with regret that I tender my resignation as a member of the Civil Service Commission for the City of North Richland Hills. This action is necessary due to a recent promotion and pending relocation to Chicago. I have truly enjoyed working with the City during the past several years, and hope the City has benefited as much as I have personally. Best of Luck. Very Truly Yours, ; . 'ô}L- ~ G. Phelps ., DGP:dsp cc: Ron McKinney Division of Reliance Electric CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: Council Meeting Date: 8/11/86 Request of Carlisle Property for Release of of Utility Easement Resolution No. 86-34 GN 86-82 Agenda Number: Carlisle Property Company, owners of the Northland Shopping Center, have submitted a request for the release of a 10 by 25 foot easement located on their shopping center site. This easement was originally designed to provide utility access to a portion of the building which has been constructed on the site. However, in the process of construction the location of the building was shifted slightly and as a result of that shift the easement was discovered to be under the building. The applicants are requesting that the City Council release the easement in order that the permanent lender on the shopping center can be provided with a clear title. The applicant has contacted all of the City's franchise utility companies and each of these has verified that they have no facilities in the existing easement. The City itself does not have any existing or projected need for the easement. Under the terms of the current state law no release of City-controlled property, i.e., easements or rights of way may be made without compensation by the applicant to the City. The latest evaluation on the subject property was provided by the City's appraiser in preparation for the right of way acquisition for Watauga Road. The value established for the right of way by the appraiser is $8.00 per square foot. The Staff is of the opinion that easements on this tract should be valued at half cost of actual property value or $4.00 per square foot. This would make the value of the easement proposed to be released $1000.00. . RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the request by Carlisle Property Company for release of the easement on the Northland Shopping Center Site and enact Resolution No. 86-34 officially releasing the subject easement to the applicants upon payment of the sum of $1000.00 to the City by the ~pplicant. Finance Review Acet. Number Sufficient Funds Available /211/ ~ I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 ·U " . , June 24, 1986 . Mr. Ri chard Royston , City of North Richland· Hills P. O. Box 18609 ~!orth, . Texas 76118 Easement abandonment Northland Shopping Center North Richland Hills, Texas [vir. Royston: Please consider this our formal request for a hearing before .the City Council to consider the abandonment of the easement described on the attached sheet entitled Fielà Notes. Attached also ôre ôpproval letters from Texas Electric Service Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone and Lone Star Gas Company. Will you please advise at which City Council Meeting this · request can be heard. If you have any questions or need, any additional information, please call this office.!; '. ~. . Very truly yours, '~~~ r·1ark r4i randa olb Attachs. cc: Pearce and Associates, Inc. /-, / ,/ -_/~ if ~ CARLISLE PROPERTY COMPANY RETAil-INVESTMENT BUilDERS 12340 Inwood Road · ~o. Box 802636. Dallas, Texas 75380-2636 .214fl33-5555 I ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I F"IE:L-I:> ........CJ.E::!3 BEING a ~ract of land situated in the J.C. Yates Survey, Abstract No. 1753, being a portion of Lot 5, Block 1, Northland Shopping Center Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas~ as recorded in Vol. 388-173 Page 99, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at an iron rod in the east R.O.W. line of Rufe Snow Drive (100' R.O.W.), said point being the most southerly southwest corner of said Lot 5; THENCE: N 03°15'00" E 15.00 feet along the east line of Rufe Snow Drive to a point; THENCe: S 86 °45 ' 00" E 14 1 . 00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described easement abandonment; THENCE N 03°15'00" E 25.00 feet to a point; THENCE S 86°45' 00" E 10.00 feet. 1:.,0 a point; THENCE S 03°15' 00" W 25.00 feet 1:.,0 a point; THENCE N 86°45'00" W 10.00 feet to t.he POINT Containing 250 square feet or 0.0057 acres of OF BEGINNING and land, more or less. . ~ . , '-, I ' · '- I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I , I TEXAS ':J ELECTRIC ), '(~~:l - L...~ f SERVICE COMPANY June 12, 1986 Wanda Calvert City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Dear Mrs. Calvert: Texas Electric Service Company has no objections to the removal of the 10 X 25' wide easement dedicated on Lot 5 Block I Northland Shopping Center Addition Recorded in Volume 388-173 Page 99 Plat Records for Tarrant County, Texas. The attached sketch shows this easement. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, ~JJ!~ Gaylon M. Hicks Senior Right-of-Way Agent !t .i ~. 1 I I 1_" ~ IT-- I .~ J r ~ ~~II~ '4\ I ~' II I - 11- tn rt\ II ~lr \.. s · I I , 701 C" ( 10' LOT '5 ~""''S'OO''L~ ~(;, ~ $"' ~~" ~ ,. \ ~ . ,,~ 'so ~~ \170.50' I ". "'-UTILITY EASEMENT--.. I o o tD I o o I; 10 ~ I: -10 . . \D 170 ~ · 877.371 IE /. ( I 0 0 · R , 0 ~ w ~. ) . _ ro," ...~..:..~ ..;,...t ..;\, : t~ \\ \ .j ~ tð' . .- -- PLAT RECORD VOIIDIE 388 173 9 " ~ \ 127.00' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. r~ :i~ ~ II ~ 00' l L./r/~ / rr €A~~~¿-A/r Z-- J . ~:..1 ~ ~í' rf' ¿ lY r-, ". 1 / Ò t .J- I ~ -= . 1 I' ~ t? I~' " <! 0 ~ ',s ·ot?"(þ. I --.--J "1 $" '~6,.~0' I~ IS-' o () c) 0- N \U '% .~ { N SCALE' I II. 40' LOT I BLK A NORTHLAND SHOflPINO CENT£JIt ADDITION VOL.3S'.1S1 PO.82 o o 10 ~ ~ 1 .~ ~ .. . " ... J :,: t,. .., r-: ~~. \.. ~ o .0 ·in ~ Lð/.AT"n:::JN ^I r. ~, I"?AP ); . . W Q) z , 4... ~ \r ?. ~.~ I '- I 1 I I I I I II I 1 I I I I 1 , I Southwestern Bell Telephone H.E.B. Engineering 1901 Central Drive Room 408 Bedford, Texas 76021 May 19, 1986 Pearce and Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers 1820 Highway 35E Suite 102 Car~ollton, Texas 75006 Attn: Kim Dickerson Re: Northland Shopping Center Addition 83-046 J.C. Yates Survey Abstract No. 1753 City of North Richland lIills, Tarrant County, Texas Southwestern Bell Telephone Company agrees to release a ten by t wen t y f 00 tea s e In en ton the sou t h pro per t y I i n eon the a b 0 ve captioned lot. This easement does not contain telephone equip- ment and can be abandoned. See the attachod plat showing the location of said easement. Any questions call JiIumy Clar'k on (817)267-6741. 9~ø:)Î~ /~nager-Eng{neering (Design) £.,.-/ !# ~:; CC City of North Ricl11and lIills, Texas Planning & Zoning 7301 N.E. Loop 820 P.O. Box 18609 Nort11 Richland Ilil1s, Texas 76118 1 p/-: ~.; I 1 I I I I I -- I I I I 1 I 1 {' 1 K. N. WATKINS General Superintendent of Distribution Lone Star Gas Company FORT WORTH DIVISION OF DISTRIBUTION 100 W. Mo,nlngald. Dr. · Port Worth, T..0116110 April 28, 1986 Pearce and Associates 1820 Hwy. 35E, Suite 102 Carrolton, Texas 75006 ATTN.: KIM DICKERSON Re: Easement abandonment Northland Shopping Center Addition North Richland Hills, Texas. Dear Ms. Dickerson: In regard to your correspondence of April 24, 1986, please be advised that Lone Star Gas Company has no facilities in the 10' x 25' section of the easement on the south area of the property. (See attachment). Therefore, Lone Star Gas Company offers no objection to the abandonment and relocation of this section of the easement only. Lone Star Gas Company has facilities in all other areas of the public utility easements. If further information is required, plr~se advise. !I ~:' Sincerely, ~~ J. M. Seals Sectional Supervisor II Facility Records & Planning Group km Attachment cc: file I:-l~' '-41 , -. .....::-, . .. ~".' .' ~~""~ .'.:.-. I· '.~' '.' , "' '-, . >. . I···· . . -' . I;,~~-· ".. , . ; ~ -«. t . II.~ .~:......... .(JI.. ..... 0 IÞ I:. ¡ '. " I .. , ... ~. I:.~_.. . . ~. ~.:'. ...... ~ ~ .:". ... I' ,~ . :, ~'...--. . ~ ~ ~. -. I , I . Ï ~..~ : ~ f;;· 'lr~:2l:""~' ¡;:., :"';: .... ~~:<:::.,~. r c:: . .. .. ~ ;.. .:.' d~.>.~··,~·::.:: ~<. ..:;~' ' .';:~.~. ':'0' '. "\'..:. . - . " " .;) "'f · ....~ ¡~f~ ·'~~l:?·i?tfj.~~: I~:'~ 'l~~~t;· , , ..~ ~.-!.~. ~;}~jfl . .:)~;t~:;; ~ ~: . . 86~ 45100" t' \ 0; ,Þ . : "0 · :.~' . ~:":~}'J~~;~;~ . . . -.. . .......".;. ..' .,.... ~ ~ .~-. . .- .~ :.<: ·"~~?·j1;.~I~~ " . .. ", . J." .' ~ ..~ .t >.: .~r.;'J~: . , .... · / .. J -.- r.. ~ 1 -- It ...,. f" ~..~. . '0 .~,. ':i'~,",.'. ..:. ... ".~ ;;.:. i," tr~"~?!~~"";J/ ~t:.:~4..' ...~ 'J,.~ ~~~ ~),~' ...;"'-':;'f. "".......:-.." .("~':'..' IS'. I :'~:~~» ......~ ".~~. ;.;. ..~.. 1..~·~~~··:t ~~~~?. ,,~.~.... :i ":- ~.~.;~~~, :-,~.J :':1 r' :.~-; ..,..... . !~~",1.:' ~ ~ ">>' '~')~' ~~- ,......'tI: .¡ .......r~ t.....· r" ".. .... ..;" r.. ~ "'C'" ,'(, ~_ . ' ~ ,., -.1' . ..... ........"... ..... ~,.. I.'r~· 'J\ ..jA ~'. . .1t1Øt.~o,. -~~.. o.":\j; O~ .'."~.:.:~.:... . ., ..'.'. :.' ¡,-' "o~"..·· . ;: ....:-. " . "~" J r.·.··.' ~'... ..... . ~: .'#"~. .. ~ I' ,"~' 0"",. . .;~. '.J!':' ~ '.' , . ,:,_,.C .:~...~ Z'"~ -. .( ;:: C'.;¡ ~ iI.' ~" .... "; ."':":~'.' :,:. .....: ;'J~ " -~ ~; · U. :~':' "'; ~:.::'.. ~·:·,~~.:t\;~~~);..::,.,: :. Þ~~~~rf~Š}:~'~ ::·:itf.: t· '.: t:::~,,~: ':~.~~ .) :. ~ .}'.. 0 ,: .~; I:':'~.·:'~,' .. ,_. '. ~,: ~''''. ,~.~'J:' .~ ....::.~.¡: " ..' -< r 1("" . · · -. ~ . ..~, ';' .' : .' & ., · O·i . ;::::. .. rrt ~~?" .. . '. .'" ,.;..~~. ,. 't, : y ..» . -f ~::.. . ..... .. ~ . . I.. '. . , ^ .... '. .. , ; ";':' ,'...;. · \. .:. ':~ . :-:.:' ~'.; : :~: 'm j.'¡';~. .; . " .: I~:.·· · ;..... . ,.... ". . : d' ...!: '1"!.... . ". ,':' ,- .. ;i;~·~~~:.,:·:,.: ":: .. .' .:. ~~~:i::~;~2::~itit~;;~ i; f;.:.::.~ "'\::~ ..' .~. 3, :~'~~" tn :.. .' ..:: ".' :. ~~.~:.;~: ~.~~~?~~~:. '~:f:~~ i>';" . S 86 45 00 E . 176. 00 ~ -~..:r-.", ;.Þ', ':'.;., . ; .... ..... ':"_' '1'd ~'}.. M 8~ u.,. ~ ' I?t:' 1-./ C .' I'/&.. øø ~ '., . ...... .f f.. jt~..~ot" ":'Þ~..(,~ IQ~-?~~;': '!'j '. . "~ ;. ::.J..: ~. L.....: ~. .. · · "".:~. · j.:......,. .. ; ,:-, ..., .:,'.. r I' S ' , .' . -. .,. ;'l: '::" t;"; ~~ !' "-'" -i:;i~~~(~., ." ~~"ur ···.:.::.t.··::..· '>:'tt(: ~~:: ..~'\'.::~ -{j~t;·i~.~:;·~t'~i:;~~i~~~~f;3\~};;)~? i~,:,:::::;.. ~". '. ~>";" ; :;: (:~;~~~~g~.~:~;~~~~~;~t~ .. ~~ ", ".' " ,..... · · . . . ..... .., · " '.. "". · "t... .~S.i.- .. '/: ~':::..~:. ····;~I~~\~~~;;/ . ; '.:~::~' ::; ,';'~' : ;,. ;';: -~t..~~,. :t::·?~·~~:·~ .;:"\.~ ~. ,':,:~~;;, ~ : . ·,~~;:t}·~;.·· ". ' .~~< :?;.:~:r~~~i ' . ~..:.. ... .. · · '.' .."... ~ en .. , . ..... .... '.. \f) .. ," ..~., ·wro. ..' . ". -....;ox, -.... ~}.:. ;':i,) . ~~.~./~, .; '.~ <~ '.:. ::': .~:;. :;.;':'~ :.:'; '. ~. ~ ~:. ::'.'< {~<~': ~::;:"'" '" . . . i :/: ~~ . .:~~~~:;,~.. '. .: )~ :~:\: ~.. :.;:~~J ~~~~. . ~ ~ . ~.. ~ "f~..~ .\. '.... f ':-. · . . .:..~': '_,- '. 0'\ g :¡ ..~.. . ... ~., · . . ~ \1 '. t:: .', -..; ,~ ,....... .' _ .. ....... ft 1':.;...; -r-.-!.:..~:.~,: ~J.~~ t\.: .'. . :, - ': ...-<' j"1'....: -: ,. ',.~.:' '.' .::. ::.:: · r. ~. ~. ~;';'. . :;..¡ ..... ':',' f;.., · ¡ :..~ .; V' 2'> . .i..:..:.:' ... _ : .. _ .:;..,¿ ",~ _ ".;:.1::. . Y.:, . _¿ ",':- ~ _: ~.;,'........ ~ '. , . · . . ;::;;.,;..' '. I.. ~..- -~ í: .....,. """""....:. ., _. .,.1.. ::t :-;- - . V : ., . ~ f<ö;) () ~.. 1<'''' t, , - . \... ~ .~. ~. :.. .'( ~ ",.",. ',1· 1'.. ~ r . ~:~ ~~; . ::. ·(:;t;i¡:~~~:;:~.;· ;~·U~..::: ;~~.: ':'~' 7(.' -:J-'~ :'.::;: ':" 'f1". :::... þ. .ll·. :.~:~~';.:.~~. ~.. '¿,) '" ~ : .>~':.~::~:~. :~\ ·~:~·K~~/fr\l~~·.:' . .....¡¡.;, ... ..1.", '.' ....... n (j .' ~. ~, ....... . '~~., . ...ro.... '_". ~ .,,~, :';,... :.: -:.. ': :'...:':;. ~~.' -.; ;:. - ..... k . " . ~.:...,. m \11' \. ';.~ ~-:~ ,: :~;:.. ~~." :.:: ,,. .,(.'?, ~ r -: :.-'¿~;¡.t"""'~>~: , I ~. - .. ': ")~"..... ". .. \)~ o. ,:,... '" _Y.~"·""'='~""-;4':1.,,~.. . .... .¡.. ).~I'Ÿ:~1...:..,~~~;" ~ "~~; :~~¡~~' ~: . :. ::....<.(:.~..,: '.<. ',..: Q1 ~-::...;u. . Ž. :'~'~:<{.t',i.;.~'þ~'i .. ~. ·:.y\.:.~i;.:\;}!¡·;;!1~:: ~ :..'~ ".:C. ._. . ~ ..... . I . ..' 0 . (T\,. " '.;! . & . .I".., ~ ..-: =. "'. ""_..#f~? , ~ ... _.~. . .. ....; :..... J:: ~.\. ,~L\¡..~- h."; ~'';:,J,.1.' ..'...... .'. . .... . V' -{ ::.... ...... . ......: ~ ... ~ .... .' ~"_,,,:"'" .:I;¡,',,~. ~. -, '. ': ':.' A".:. :.. '.. '. , .. -, .. ::t ." .' 'f ".Y~" '~...,., ,"to; .. . ....:. -',,, ;." ~ rJ; ;! _~~ ~~. '.,,~.. ' . .:'~:;¡~.~~¡~..~ · '.,.. '. :f· .' .'. " .. ' 0.. r" '.,.....:::...~. .,:". :~~?:~!' ::'~J '. '.' :: "':F}~;;" ·;.~:7;~.~, ~. .... .;, .\".~¡~~ :....: " ~.: .) . ... 'n t. @ ...., · ~ "r." ~~ · ..... ~ ...~.¿. "'. ~";">i~'Y"~ \i. .'" '··::1j,~~~.~~~ "-~'!:/~~:'<~~':;::-...'..'.:,':;.'" - ~ r~ I ffi~·~~,·:i~)}:;.~.:tr\i~.~ ..·:·/·§:~r:~.:2~1.§~É~*l~i~: ..." ..,II' -:"':~.':. ,. .' ~\\' .. ',' _.' ":"'-:~'!" ... .;-;.=?:~~' '~::. . I z.' · 0 ' -. ,.'. .' 5 IJ(,. 4 i ''00' E ;.' :.1 ";'~ ~ ,. ZC¡o. oój;;'~:- . < '>:"~-:'~1~ "..: '. ". " .:; ,'" :'; .... ~':, '.. : .... ....:...~/\~, .;:i~'::;'-ts¡~ · ,~ ~:!~~; ;r ~.,.::~~, ~~~~~~~_-_f:_.~-: · '. '. 'i:: !~,~~ t1. . \h ,., ..,..::.: ., .: .' .. ... ::.. · ..... . '. ,.. f" ; .;):~ ,,,..¿ .-:',' ",'.u.ç~.~}!.;.,(,'t;.,: ' N , ........ J~: , ;. '.\ '" '.:.. w .' \ .. . . ,. e..t --. 0'; . ....... ; .# . ". . .' . .. .. . . . ' . ... t'-. " ~ , "\ " ':Á:\~"'~. .. 'I~\:' .. ~f:~Jf .':: ;~ iT~'; /?v ,., .. ...' . ) , , .. () \ .~( ~ "'~'. .' . '.... .. '..' .....: :;.. ~'.. .\ " Of:.. ..;'.~.:~.' ;......? :~-::'~~3S~S: ..... :'.,,- .0 ~ J1' :.~ ',1; .~:. . - .' . .. : ==- ,..:.~,.. 4 4 5 00 I ;" ':~: '.:.; ;~:i~.\ . . . .~;g:l~~Jtß0j;:~~~!lJ '. ..' . ~h.."""", í",L~...., SS' k ' . ". .... ; ...~~~{~~ . X··f~~l ~~N)i~,.~:. _:t~' ,. ~ I::~:;-~'~'" '~.',~ (It ·~::'}~:;iSr"· V.:, ~ S NIIÞ tJ' .. ..)..... ...~-1.:. - " .... ~ ,>..1,7'., :: .-;:;}~~ .. '~. .". . . ... _. :?~;. . .;": '~~a: I -- I I 1 I I I I . I I I I I I I , ~ RESOLUTION 86-34 A RESOLUTION ABANDONING AN EASEMENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, NORTHLAND SHOPPING CENTER ADDITION TO THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas finds that it presently ownes a ten foot by twenty-five foot easement, presently dedicated for general utility use purposes, on property described below; and WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the City of North Richland Hills no longer needs, uses or anticipates a need or use for such easement. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills that: I. The City of North Richland Hills shall, and does hereby, abandon all right, title or interest in and to that certain ten foot by twenty-five foot easement along the south property line of Lot 5, Block 1, Northland Shopping Center Addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, such easement having been previously granted and dedicated to the City of North Richland Hills by platting of said Northland Shopping Center Addition recorded in Volume 388-173, Page 99 Plat Records for Tarrant County, Texas. II. By Passage and adoption of this Resolution it is the intent of the City of North Richland Hills to relinquish any and all claims to such easement or to any future use of such easement. This Resolution shall be filed with the Deed Records of Tarrant Count~,: Texas, as evidence of the abandonment of such easement by this City". ,#. . . .i !? PASSED AND RESOLVED THIS day of , 1986 APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY ".~ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration 8/11/86 - Council Meeting Date: Schematic Design of Fire Station #4, Training Center and Fire Administration Offices Agenda Number: GN 86-83 SUbject: I I I I Representatives from Phillip A. Swager & Associates will be here Monday night for Pre- Council to make a presentation on the completed schematic design for the new Fire Station #4, Training Center and Fire Administration Offices. The design phase of this project is now complete and before additional funds are committed for detailed plans and specifications, we need the Council's approval of the general design, layout and space allocation of the buildings involved. The plans and specifications must be formally approved by the Council; however, it is proposed that the schematic design be reviewed in Pre-Council. Recommendation: Approve schematic design and space allocation. I I I I 1 I Source of Funds: I Bonds (GO/Rev.) r I Operating Budget , f- Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available I IC Ij/fr/~ Department Head Signature I City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I Department: Fire _ Council Meeting Date: 8/11/86 SUbject: Proposed Grass and Weed Ordinance - Ordinance 1392 Agenda Number: GN 86-84 1 The enforcement of the City's high grass and weed ordinance is budgeted for next year to be moved to the Fire Prevention Division of the Fire Department. Our current ordinance is basically 13 years old and needs to be reviewed. Attached is a proposed ordinance which regulates high grass and weeds with proposed modifications intended to transfer the burden of property management (cleaning and mowing) from the general city taxpayers to the property owners. The primary changes as proposed include increasing the charge for mowing service to the extent that it will be more economical for the property owner to handle the mowing rather than relying on the City to do so; increasing the administrative fee to more adequately recover the cost of this service; and levying the administrative fee to recover costs even when the property owner mows the weeds if such action is taken in response to a notification by the City Inspector. It is also proposed to strictly comply with the present ordinance requirement that notification to the owner be given only once in each calendar year. I I I I Recommendation: Approve the attached ordinance. 1 ,; ~, Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available K f/lµ City Manager , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I ORDINANCE NO. 1392 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR CONTROLLING GRASS, WEEDS, OR UNCULTIVATED PLANTS AND PROVIDING FOR THE CUTTING AND REMOVAL OF GRASS, WEEDS AND UNCULTIVATED PLANTS BY THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS WITH A COST INCURRED TO CONSTITUTE A LIEN, ESTABLISHING A PENALTY CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Be it Ordained by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that: SECTION 1. I I I II I I I It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation, partnership, association of persons, owner, agent, occupant or anyone having supervision or control of any lot, tract, parcel of land or a portion thereof, occupied or unoccupied within the corporate limits of the City of North Richland Hills to suffer or permit grass, weeds or any plant that is not cultivated to grow to a greater height than twelve (12) inches on an average or to grow in rank profusion upon said premises, including along the sidewalk or street adjacent to the same between the property line and the curb or if there is no curb then the property shall be maintained to the travelled portion of the street. Provided, however, in the case of agricultural tracts of five acres or larger, this ordinance will be satisfied if the hay or grass is kept mowed to a height no greater than 12 inches for a distance of 100 feet around the entire perimeter of the tract. SECTION 2. I I 1 I r I It shall be the duty of any person, Jirm, corporation, partnership, association of persons, owner:,... :agent, occupant or anyone having supervision or control of any lot, tract, parcel of land, or portion thereof, occupied or unoccupied within the corporate City of North Richland Hills to remove or cause to be cut and removed all such grass, weeds or plants as often as may be necessary to comply with Section (1) of this ordinance. ,; ~,; SECTION 3. In the event that the owner of any lot, tract, parcel of land, or a portion thereof, situated within the corporate limits of North Richland Hills shall fail to comply with Section (1) of this ordinance then the City Manager or his designated representative may cause such property owner to be notified of such fact by registered letter addressed to the owner's last known post office address as shown on the City tax rolls. The City of North Richland Hills shall have complied with this requirement by advising such owners of their responsibilities under this ordinance once during any given calendar year. Following the expiration of not less than ten (10) days from the date of the notice, the City of North Richland Hills may enter I ~ I upon such premises and may do such work as necessary or cause the same to be done in order that the premises comply with the requirements set forth in Section (1) of this ordinance. The City of North Richland Hills may enter onto such premises and may do such work as necessary, or cause the same to be done, as often as violations exist without further notification to the property owner during the calendar year that the written notice was given. 1 I SECTION 4. I In the event that a violation exists and the City gives notice of violation an administrative fee of $75.00 shall be charged against the owner of the land in question which shall become a charge against the land if not paid within 30 days of billing by the City. I In the event that the land owner fails to abate the violation after notice, and the City enters upon the premises and does mowing or other work to bring the property in compliance, a charge will be made for mowing and cleaning the lot which shall be a charge against the owner and if not paid within 30 days of billing by the City, will become a charge against the property. I I ~ The City charge for mowing and cleaning of acreage shall be $75.00 per acre. The charge for mowing platted lots shall be $60.00 per lot for mowing, plus actual cost of cleanup for vacant lots, and for lots with any type of building or structure the charge shall be $75.00 per lot for mowing, plus actual cost of cleanup. I If the charge is not paid to the City within 30 days after billing, the City may file a lien upon the premises for all administrative fees and costs of abatement. Such lien shall be signed by the Mayor and shall contain a statement of charges and a total. The lien shall be filed in the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas. The charges shown ~n the lien shall bea~ ~~~erest at the rate of 8% per annum from due date until paid. Suit may be filed for foreclosure of such lien and a certified copy of the lien filed in the Deed Records shall be prima facie proof of the charges and the reasonableness thereof. . ; ~ I I I SECTION 5. I Before any application for change of zoning, platting or replatting is accepted, all liens and charges arising under the terms of this ordinance shall be satisfied. In addition the property will be inspected to ascertain that Section 1 hereof is not violated at the time of application. 1 I r I SECTION 6. If any article, section, subsection or paragraph of this ordinance is found to be unconstitutional, the effect of such holding by a court of competent jurisdiction shall in no way effect the · I ~ I validity or enforceability of any and all other remaining articles, sections, subsections, paragraphs. It is the purpose and intent that each paragraph, subsection, section and article of this ordinance be severable and independent one from another. I SECTION 7. I This ordinance shall be cumulative of all o~her ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills relating to the subject matter hereof except where such ordinances or parts hereof are in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, in which event, such ordinances so conflicting are hereby expressly repealed. I I PASSED AND APPROVED this 11th day of August, 1986. I Mayor ATTEST: I - City Secretary I APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: I Attorney ,; It' I I 1 1 I r I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance - Council Meeting Date: 8/11/86 Public Hearing - Revenue Sharing Budget Agenda Number: GN 86-85 A budget hearing on Revenue Sharing Entitlements was advertised to be held on August 11, 1986 for all interested citizens of the City of North Richland Hills. The purposed budget is summarized as follows: Recreation Facility Equipment New Recreation Center $ 22,772 Recreation & Library Computer System $ 75,500 $ 64,960 Library Furniture & Equipment Total Proposed Expenditures $163,232 Recommendation: ; Conduct public hearing on the budget as submitted ~nd:~llow all interested persons to be~ heard for or against any item therein, and close the public hearing after all interested persons have been heard. It is also recommended that September 8, 1986 be established as the date for adopting the final budget for fiscal year 1986/87 Revenue Sharing Budget. Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other x . Finance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM City Manager Page 1 of 1 I I f I I I I I I ,. 1 I 1 I I I I t' I PARK/RECREATION MOVE IN COSTS REVENUE SHARING ITEM TOTAL $ FUNCTION REQUESTED RECOMMENDED Equipment 2 Volleyball Nets $ 250 2 Umpire Stands 500 12 Mats 1,608 Mat Dolly 75 Crash Mat 454 Spring Board 400 Indoor Soccer 450 Badmitten Set 40 Floor Tape Machine 50 Dual Score Board 1,400 10 Folding Tables 500 1 Table Rack 100 100 Folding Chairs 1,200 2 Chair Dollies 180 10 Card Tables 300 1 Post Chalk Board 150 Sub Total $7,657 Weight Room 1 Bulletin Boards $ 50 Free Weight Set 520 Free Weight Racks 350 Weight Machine 8,900 Dumbbell Rack 450 Scales 275 Dumbbell Set 500 Sub Total $11,045 ,; It , Game Room Table Games $1,000 PP Ball Dispenser 100 Ping Pong Table 1,930 Sub Total $3,030 Gym Equipment Balls/Games $ 200 Ì' League Balls 300 Ball Cart 40 Minor Equip/Supplies 500 Sub Total $1,040 I I , ITEM TOTAL $ FUNCTION RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED I Computer 1 IBM 36 $62,100 2 Terminals 2,200 1 Wands 2,000 I Maintenance 5,000 Supplies 2,500 3 Tables 450 Installation 1,000 I Cable Atch. 100 Fire Resistant Safe 150 Sub Total $75,500 I Furniture File Cabinet $ 275 2 Book Bins 1,300 2 Book Trucks 380 I 20 Children's Chairs 400 3 Children's Tables 300 5 Study Carrels 1,600 1 2 Step Stools 60 40 Chairs 807 1 Couch 800 -. 2 Casual Seats 700 1 Index Table 1,000 Dictionary Stand 325 1 Atlas Stand 750 I 10 Reader Tables 3,500 2 Reading Lamps 100 80 Reading Chairs 16,000 I 13 Study Carrels 5,200 1 File Cabinet 275 ,; 3 Typing Chairs 750 If , 8 Chairs 800 1 1 Table 400 6 Tables 600 75 Chairs 750 I 1 Lecturn Microphone 750 1 Library Directory 1,700 6 Waste Baskets 150 I 2 Clocks 100 Mail Room Furniture 1,237 2 Mail Sort Bins 452 1 Mailing Machine 3,179 1 1 Electronic Scale 2,525 1 Heavy Duty Dolly 85 1 File Cabinet 275 I it I I I , I I I I I 1 -. I I I I I I I t' I ITEM FUNCTION RECOMMENDED TOTAL $ RECOMMENDED Furniture Cont'd Media Board Volunteer Cord. Desk Volunteer Cord. Typew. Volunteer Cord. Chair 1 Casual Chair Film Cabinet 1 Filmstrip Cabinet 2 Cassette Panels 2 Reader Printer Carrel 6 Chairs 1 Stool 4 Wet Carrals 2 Computer Carrels 2 Floor Lamps 1 Portable Lecturn 2 Flag Poles 350 700 1,200 250 500 500 450 300 800 1,500 100 1,600 1,160 200 725 300 $58,160 $1,400 950 1,100 150 25 950 200 750 375 900 $6,800 Sub Total Audio-Visual 16MM Projector VCR Monitor 16MM Projector 1 Flim Strip Proj. 1 Carry Case 1 VCR Monitor 5 Puppet/Propr. 2 Video Patch Sys. 2 Sigma Alignment Cds. 1 Video Monitor Cable Sub Total if , Total $163,232 I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance SUbject: Public Hearing'- Operating Budget - Council Meeting Date: 8/11/86 Agenda Number: GN 86-86 I I I The Charter of the City of North Richland Hills, Article VII, Section 3, states that at a meeting of the Council at which the budget and budget message are submitted, the Council shall determine the place and time of the public hearing on the budget and shall publish a notice of the place and time. At the time and place so advertised, the Council shall hold a public hearing on the budget as submitted, at which all interested persons shall be given an opportunity to be heard, for or against any item therein. The proposed Calendar of Events for the fiscal year 1986/87 budget is attached. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council set the publi¿hearing to be held at City Hall located at 7301 N. E. Loop 820, on August 25, 1986 at 7:30 p.m. ,; !f , Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other N/A -rm -rm N/A , Finance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM '.. /~ City Manager Page 1 of 1 I 1 i' I I I I 1 I -. I I "I I I I 1 it I July 25, 1986 August 15, 1986 August 25, 1986 August 25, 1986 September 8, 1986 September 8, 1986 September 8, 1986 September 8, 1986 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILI.S CAI.ENDAR FOR TAX YEAR 1986 Chief Appraiser's Certifies Tax Roll Publish Notice of Public Hearing on Operating Budget and Revenue Sharing Budget Public Hearing for Operating Budget - SeEarate Agenda Item Public Hearing on Revenue Sharing Budget _ Separate Agenda Item City Council to set exemption rates for Over/65 and Disabled Citizens at $25,000 each, and Homestead Exemption of 10% or minimum of $5,000 City Council to set tax rate City Council to adopt Operating Budget _ Separate Agenda Item City Council to adopt final Revenue Sharing Budget - Separate Agenda Item ,; .-~ I ~ CJ :> I > n 00 G') ~ en t-tJ ..- "-' Ø) ~ (1) Ø) c (þ t"tC'" t-3 ÞOtj ~ ~ ..- ÞOtj t; '< c 0 t- o.. (1) :'j ÞOtj 00 Q. Ø) en 00 rt t"t t; t; rt ...... 0 OOQ t' s (1) ~ Ø) Q) '< ~ (1) ..- =:s t-h(1) 0 t1~ ...... ...... ~ :'j (1) =' t"t c: <:Þtj Q) C/) (1) ~ =:s ~O CI) ::s ~ o ::T rt n t1 (1) n t1 (þ fJ) (1) n- t1 (1) r1'Ø3 0.. <: :Tt1 t1 00 ~ ...... (1) er(1) 0 ~=' I ,.Q '-< t1 (þ "-OQ ~ <: ~ 00 ~ 0 ..-rt..... ....... :TO t1 ::T 0 0 ....... -.....J ~::s (1) ('1) (1) ø Q) 0.. 00 ~ U'1 W 0 '" -.....J 0 txj ::s r-t I 00 w 0 00 '" W -.....J U'1 Z Q.:T r1'~ (þ U'1 \.0 ..¡::... U1 \.0 \.0 -.....J t%j (1) o Þ"Cj ~ ~ '- ~ $! =:0 Þ"CjÞOtj V1 ....... N W \0 00 ....... ...... 0 00(1) N ....... ~ ..... N 0 N ~ ......þU Þtj t1 =:s ....... w N '" ..... w '" f-o-o&(1) (1) r1' 0.. 00 t1 I t1 ...,.. ~ ~ Q) ~ en r1' ....... r1' r1" (I) ~ 0 N U'1 ....... H..... (1) t; t1 c::: t-3 (1) ~ <: (1) V1 ~ 00 W N N W t-3 0 ~OQ r-t~ fJ) N N '" \0 W '" U'1 H t-3 Q) ::Tn \0 ~ 0 ..... 0 '" '" ..-..04 :> fJ) txj I (þ (1) Ø) ~ ~ ~ ~ co t1 ....... N '" . ..... w ..... -.....J H Q. 00 (1) N 0 N N 0 W V1 .-<: 0 (JQ ~ t-rj U'1 0 0 0 0 ~ ..... ""d t-3(1) ÞOtj ~ ::s t%j ::rr-t ÞOtj =:s 0 ~ (1) o 0. rt ~ ~ I t1 N N OJ ~ t-h~ r-t Q) t1 ~ 00 0 Hn o t-' =:s (1) +='-- ..¡::... tx1Zt-3 ZH t-' t-' 00 0.0 co co ~t::1~ OH ~ (1) 0 \0 \0 "'%j K: 0 cT t; not; ~t:1 0 t:d ( (þ I <: ::To.. 0 0 CJtr1 ~ §~ ~ ..... (þ (þ ..... ....... t%jt;d ::s ::T 0 t1 0.. ..... ..... t-3 t:d c.J ()Q (þ (þ (1) C:::tljZ ~ t-d t-h ...,.. t;t-30 ero.. c::: "'%j 0 ::s ~ ..-..04 G') ~ ~ t;d s:: t1 V1 ~ Ht-d txjtJ:jt-3 0..0 ~ fe ::s (1) r-t W '" W ~ ~~ H~::I: OQ ::s H 0. ::r ~ (t) CJ rt (1) 0 0 0 0 ~tlj~ r1' ::T 0 0 0 0 ~ ~:X:H > Z (1) r-t 0 0 0 0 Q-» '"dn J-J. ~ 0 0 ~tlj::I: Cf)OQ t-3 in r-t Z~ c: H I :>< Q) .....t;~ ÞOtj co CJ Þ"Cj t-' ~ 00 ~ \OH t1 r1' txj (þ ....... ....... ~~ cot-3t; 0 =:s 0 '" 0'\ O\C::: ÞOtj N 0..0 W W ~t%j I ~::x:: 0 U1 ........... HZ OOtx1H fJ) ~ no s:: N N ZC::: -.....J ,.-..04 (þ I c: a w w c.Jtxj CJè-t 0....... t1 ::s N N roo \0 CD . :> t-h 00 ,; en en o '" ~_... 00 t1 t; H H (1) ::T ""d fo%j t-h t-h I 0 (1) ~ H ~o 0 ~ CJ en t1 t; c.J \.0 (X) » 0 0..(1) ..... \0 ..... 0 t-3 Q) (1) ::s vi t-3 H ~Q) 0.(1) ..¡::... V1 ~ H 0 t-' I t1 co 0 w V1 0 ~ '< f-o-o& .....Q) 0 0 0 0 ~ (1) =:s t-' Q) ~ t; ..... rtQ) ~ ~ ::s ::T=:S ..... ..... rt o 0. \0(1) I fJ) N W ..... ....... N N 00 00 00t; (þ c:: +:-- \0 (X) .¡::... '" w tljq 0'\(1) t"t 0 W I U1 .¡::... N +=" ~""d~ ......... fJ) t-ta..... ~ 0 <:'"d» 00r-t t::: t-' +:-- N I '" V1 +='-- V1 HO"-' -.....J(þ ::s ~ ..... 0'\ N 0 ~ 00 CJþO 0.. 0. no w 0'\ 0 0 U1 N tx1t-3 I c/)'<: 00 () (þ "'%j ~ ..a c:: ~ -Eßo rt t::: =:s N ~ Q) 0. W ..... V1 '" ..... 00 N ...... ~ ~ ~ t-3 (þ 1 Q) -.....J ....... -.....J V1 co 0 +=" 0 =:s rt t1 0'\ .¡::... ..¡::... W -.....J U1 ..... t-3 en ::T(þ ..... N W -.....J W 0 W > (þ c-4 w V1 w 00 N ~ 00 0 it 0'\ ~ -.....J 0'\ N (X) -.....J t-h \.0 U'1 W '" ..... -.....J -.....J rt ::r (þ I 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration ~ub11C Hear1ng - Commun1ty Development Block Grant Funds C ., M . D 8/11/86 ouncl eetlng ate: GN 86-87 Agenda Number: Subject: 1 Our current fund allocation for the 12th year Community Development Block Grant is $57,000. The City was required to supplement this allocation to meet a projected goal of $75,000. The reconstruction of Harmonson Street was approved for this project. We have now received an additional $15,000 CDBG allocation from the County. We recommend that the additional $15,000, as well as the $18,000 City supplement, be committed and that we continue the Harmonson Street project. An additional 200 feet on Harmonson Street can be constructed with the new funds. 1 I 1 A Public Hearing is required to receive citizen input regarding the use of the additional $15,000 allocation. All citizens, groups and organizations of our City are welcome to participate and be represented in the formulation of the 12th year plan. The Public Hearing is open for public advice, comments, complaints, questions or presentations of alternative proposals. The public may present their views in writing by obtaining a questionnaire from the City Secretary, complete it and return it to her office. Recommendation: Set date of September 8, 1986 for the Public Hearing on the allocation of $15,000 to the Harmonson Street Project. ,; ~, ~ I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Department Head Signature ¡¿ f1~~ City Manager , Finance Director I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 1 1 I I 1 I ~ -- ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Purchasing Department: Emergency Repair of Sewer Cleaning Truck in the Amount of $9,000 to Environmental Sales 8-11-86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: PU 86-20 Subject: On July 12, 1986 unit 527, a 1979 C70 Ford sewer cleaning truck, turned over in the 6100 block of Onyx Dr. Damage was excessive and due to the large size of the equipment it was moved to Environmental Sales for an estimate of repair. (Environmental Sales is the local sales/ repair center for this type of equipment). Mr. Tommy Stoneman advised me Friday, August 8, 1986 repair cost would run $9,000. He also advised that the delay in getting us an estimate was caused by the extensive damage causing him to have to remove the 1,000 gallon tank and other equipment to obtain price quotes for replacement parts. The new parts are a new pump, 1,000 gallon tank, engine repair and frame repair. A new vehicle of this type would cost $35,000 to $45,000 depending on the options ordered. We have one other sewer cleaning truck in our fleet. If for any reason the other truck were to be incapacitated we will not have the capabilities of cleaning a blocked sewer. Recommendation: Authorize the emergency repair of the 1979 sewer truck in the amount of $9,000 and the transfer of $9,000 from Utility Retained Earnings to 02-11-02-3430. ,; ï!~; re Finance Review Acct. Number 02-11-02-3430 SUffiCi~ndS Availa, ble _L~~ ¡¿~ City Manager . Finance Director ITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1