Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1986-10-13 Agendas I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 13, 1986 - 6:00 P.M. For the Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. GN 86-101 Support for Certification of all Coaches in Youth Sports Program, Resolution No. 86-39 (Agenda Item No. 23) 2. GN 86-110 Paving Assessments - Davis Memorial United Methodist Church (Agenda Item No. 26) 3. Status Report by Sammons Communications Regarding Installation of New Convertor Boxes (Bryan O'Hara) 4. GN 86-112 Award of Bid for Recreation Center/Library and Police Department Expansion (Agenda Item No. 28) 5. GN 86-113 Allocation of Funds for Completion of Fire Facilities (Agenda Item No. 29) 6. GN 86-114 Police Department Addition and Alteration (Agenda Item No. 30) 7. Municipal Court Update (Mayor Echols) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 8. Proposed Ordinance Regarding Naming of Streets, Parks and Public Facilities (Mayor Pro Tem Davis) 9. GN 86-108 Amendment to Section 10 of the Zoning Ordinance to Permit Incentive Increases in Apartment Zoning with Planned Development Controls, Ordinance No. 1409 (Agenda Item No. 24) 10. PW 86-27 Change Order #5, Chapman Drive Paving and Drainage Improvements, North Forty Road (Agenda Item No. 36) 11. GN 86-115 NRG Softball Association Proposed Building (Agenda Item No. 31) 12. Other Items 13. *Executive Session to Discuss Land, Personnel, and/or Litigation *Closed due to subject matter as provided by the Open Meetings Law I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 13, 1986 For t~e Meeting conducted at the North Richland Hills City Hall Council Chambers, 7301 Northeast Loop 820, at 7:30 p.m. NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Minutes of the Regular Meeting September 22, 1986 5. Removal of Item(s) from the Consent Agenda 6. Consent Agenda Item(s) indicated by Asterisk (25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 & 37) 7. PZ 86-39 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Rufe Snow/Chapman Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 3A2, William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from C-l to C-2 (Located at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Chapman Road) 8. Ordinance No. 1402 -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 NUMBER ACTION TAKEN ITEM 14. 12. 13. 9. PZ 86-40 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Alan W. Hamm to rezone Lot BR, Block 11, Clearview Addition, from C-l to C-2 (Located on the northwest corner of Grapevine Highway and Colorado Blvd.) 10. Ordinance No. 1403 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Campus Hills Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 3, L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 165~, from C-l and R-7-MF to C-2 (Located on the north side of Grapevine Highway east of Emerald Hills Way) Ordinance No. 1404 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Campus Hills Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 3, L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1653, from C-l and R-7-MF to I-I (Located on the north side of Grapevine -Highway east of Emerald Hills Way) Ordinance No. 1405 11. PZ 86-41 PZ 86-42 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 15. PZ 86-43 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 1 , 2 and 4A, W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from R-2 (Single Family), R-7-MF PD (Planned Development Multi-Family) and OC (Outdoor Commercial) to R-2 (Single Family) (Tract 6) (Located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive) 16. Ordinance No. 1406 17. PZ 86-44 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 1, 2 and 4A, W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from R-7-MF PD (Planned Development Multi-Family) and OC (Outdoor Commercial) to R-6-T (Townhouse) (Tract 5) (Located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive) 18. Ordina:nce No. 1407 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 4 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN 19. PZ 86-45 PLANNING & ZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 1, 2 and 4A, W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from OC (Outdoor Commercial), R-2 (Single Family), and R-7-MF PD (Multi-Family Planned Development) to OC (Outdoor Commercial) (Tracts 1 and 2) (Located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive) 20. Ordinance No. 1408 21. SO 86-12 Request of First American Savings Bane for "Message Sign" 22. SO 86-13 Request of D & G Advertising for Billboard Sign 23. GN 86-101 Support for Certification of all Coaches in Youth Sports Program, Resolution No. 86-39 24. GN 86-108 Proposed Amendment to Section 10 of the Zoning Ordinance -to Permit Incentive Increases in Apartment Zoning with Planned Development Controls - Ordinance No. 1409 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 5 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *25. GN 86-109 Bank Wire Transfer Contracts, Resolution Nos. 86-44 and 86-45 26. GN 86-110 Paving Assessments - Davis Memorial United Methodist Church *27. GN 86-111 Establishing Fees for Records Documents and Research, Ordinance No. 1410 *28. GN 86-112 Award of Bid for Recreation Center/Library and Police Department Expansion *29. GN 86-113 Allocation of Funds for Completion of Fire Facilities *30. GN 86-114 Police Department Addition and Alteration *31. GN 86-115 NRG Softball Association Proposed Building *32. PU 86-26 Award Contract for IBM Computer Expansion Components, Resolution No. 86-43 *33. PU 86-27 Office Supplies - Award Contract to General Office Supply *34. PU 86-28 Rejection of bids for Lots 14, 15, 16 Briarwood Estates I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -- - Page 6 NUMBER ITEM ACTION TAKEN *35. PW 86-26 Railroad Crossing at Smithfield Road and St. Louis Southwestern Railway *36. PW 86-27 Change Order #5, Chapman Drive Paving and Drainage Improvements, North Forty Road *37. PAY 86-21 Pay Estimate #11 and Final, Morgan Meadows East Drainage Improvements 38. Citizen Presentation Mr. Charles Parish Parish Homes Re: Sign Ordinance 39. Adjournment I -- I I I I I I I lit I I I I I I I ~ I - SAMMONS CABLE SERVI(;ES P.o. B()X 2666 F()I~T \VOI~TII, 'rr~XAS 76113 (817) 737-47:J1 October 9, 1986 Mr. Roger Line City Manager City Of North Richland Hills 7301 Worth East Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Dear Roger: As we have discussed Sanmons will be upgrading the convertors in North Richland Hills in November. We would like time on the MOnday October 13th pre-council meeting so we can infonn the council and explain the operation of the new convertor. agenda. Please call me and confinn if we are on the pre-council Sincerely, -----;:-) .-; ~:Y-ì.d- Ó~ Co- '--. C-.-' Bry~ O'Hara General Manager-Operations Sanmons Cable Services I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I (t I - MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL, 7301 NORTHEAST LOOP 820 - SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 _ 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Echols called the meeting to order September 22, 1986, at 7:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Dan Echols Marie Hinkle Mack Garvin Virginia Moody Jim Ramsey Mayor Councilwoman Councilman Councilwoman Councilman Staff: Rodger N. Line Jeanette Rewis Rex McEntire Lee Maness John Whitney Richard Albin City Manager City Secretary Attorney Finance Director Purchasing Agent City Engineer Members of the Press Absent: Richard Davis Harold Newman Dick Fisher Dennis Horvath Gene Riddle Richard Royston Mayor Pro Tern Councilman Councilman Assistant City Manager Public Works Director Director of Planning 3. INVOCATION Councilman Ramsey gave the invocation. 4. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 APPROVED Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve the minutes of September 8, 1986. Motion carried 4-0. I I I I I I I ~ I --....... I ~ I I I I I I I ~ September 22, 1986 Page 2 5. MINUTES OF THE EMERGENCY MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1986 APPROVED Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve the minutes of the September 11, 1986 meeting. Motion carried 3-0; Councilwoman Moody abstained due to absence from the meeting. 6. REMOVAL OF ITEM(S) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA None 7. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM(S) INDICATED BY ASTERISK (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 18, 19 & 20) APPROVED Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried 4-0. Mr. Line advised the Council that David Petika, Park and Recreation Director, had requested that Item No. 10 be tabled. Mr. Line stated that one of the Youth Sports Groups had a question on one of the requirements in the resolution and asked that the resolution be sent back to the Park and Recreation Commission for review. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to reconsider Item No. 10. Motion carried 4-0. Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to table GN 86-101. Motion carried 4-0. * 8. GN 86-99 HOURS OF OPERATION OF AMUSEMENT CENTERS, ORDINANCE NO. 1400 APPROVED * 9. GN 86-100 BURK COLLINS/LEWIS CRIBBS EASEMENT DISPUTE, RICHLAND OAKS ADDITION, RESOLUTION NO. 86-38 APPROVED I ~ I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I ~ I September 22, 1986 Page 3 10. GN 86-101 SuPPORT FOR CERTIFICATION OF ALL COACHES IN YOUTH SPORTS PROGRAMS, RESOLUTION NO. 86-39 TABLED *11. GN 86-102 REJECTION OF BID FOR POLICE LIABILITY INSURANCE; ESTABLISHMENT OF SELF-INSURANCE FOR AUTO AND . POLICE LIABILITY; AND RETAINING GENERAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU APPROVED *12. GN 86-103 ORDINANCE PROHIBITING OCCUPANCY OR USE OF BUILDING WITHOUT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, ORDINANCE NO. 1401 APPROVED 13. GN 86-104 PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR SERVICES WITH TRINITY ARTS COUNCIL, RESOLUTION NO. 86-40 APPROVED Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hinkle, to approve Resolution No. 86-40. Motion carried 4-0. 14. GN 86-105 PROPOSED CONTRACT WITH NORTHEAST ARTS OF TARRANT COUNTY, RESOLUTION NO. 86-41 APPROVED Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilwoman Moody, to approve Resolution No. 86-41. Motion carried 4-0. IS. GN 86-106 PROPOSED CONTRACT WITH NORTHEAST TARRANT COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RESOLUTION NO. 86-31 APPROVED Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Resolution No. 86-31. Motion carried 4-0. I I I I I I I " I - I Ie I I I I I I I -- J September 22, 1986 Page 4 15a. GN 86-107 REQUEST TO COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS AND TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE TO AMEND SALES TAX PERMITTING PROCESS, RESOLUTION NO. 86-42 APPROVED Mr. Line stated this resolution would require that the City Secretary of each affected city certify the location of each sales and use ,tax permitee. Mr. Line stated this would be a way of insuring that the sales tax was going to the correct city. Mayor Echols stated this resolution would be submitted to the TML Resolutions Committee for consideration. Councilman Ramsey moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to approve Resolution No. 86-42. Motion carried 4-0. *16. PU 86-23 AGREEMENT FOR ASBESTOS CONSULTANT "DREW ASBESTOS CONSULTANTS" APPROVED 17. PU 86-24 AWARD OF BID TO MOTOROLA FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT RADIOS IN THE AMOUNT OF $88,299 APPROVED Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Ramsey, to approve PU 86-24. Mr. Robert Parsons, 5304 Topper, appeared before the Council. Mr. Parsons stated the only question he had was would the system operate without causing interference with the City of Garland. Mr. Parsons stated he would like for the City to have assurance from Motorola that there would be no interference. Mayor Echols stated the Council had directed the City Manager that no payment would be made until assurances were made that the system would work adequately. Motion carried 4-0. *18. PU 86-25 RENTAL PURCHASE OF OFFICE TRAILER FROM AMTEX APPROVED I -- I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I ~ September 22, 1986 Page 5 *19. PW 86-25 APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER #1 _ MISCELLANEOUS WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS TO LOWELL B. ALLISON APPROVED *20. PAY 86-20 BIG FOSSIL CREEK SANITARY SEWER METERING APPROVED 21. CITIZEN PRESENTATION None 22. ADJOURNMENT Councilwoman Moody moved, seconded by Councilman Garvin, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 4-0. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary - I ~ Department: .ubject: ~ ~ ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 10/13/86 - Council Meeting Date: Request of Rufe Snow/Chapman Joint Venture to Rezone A d N b a Port10n ot Tract JA:¿, Wm. Mann ~urvey, Abs~rac~ lðlð" gen a urn er: from C-l to C-2. Ordinance No. 1402 PZ 86-39 This Zoning Application is submitted on a portion of the vacant commercial tract located at the northeast corner of Rufe Snow Drive and Chapman Road. The rezoning is from C-l Commercial to C-2 Commercial. The applicant is in the process of developing a multi-use retail shopping center on the site. The purpose for the proposed rezoning is to expand the possible uses allowed in the shopping center. In the hearing before the Commission the applicant indicated two or three prospective tenants, such as self-service car wash, an auto parts store and an auto service center. The Staff noted to the Commission that the Mobil Service Station site on the corner of Chapman and Rufe Snow was just recently rezoned to allow a car wash use. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-39 requesting rezoning of a portion of Tract 3A2, Wm. Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from C-l to C-2. ~ Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget ~- .~~~ - Departnt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM .---- ----- Finance Review ;( 11/~ City Manager i, Finance Director Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available Page 1 of 1 AG JtR-1 R-I I Ie I I I I I I I c'l'! -' Ie I I I I I I I I" I Page 4 ~ P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 ( Mr. McCaro stated he has to pick u trash now and it would be worse . this zoning is approved. Chairman Bowen Hearing. PZ 86-36 DENIED Ms. Nash made PZ 86-36. Ms. Fli o. e motion to deny motion was seconded by Bowen stated he agrees with Ms. Nash. He said the Commission has to look at the lots and the good of the entire neighborhood. Chairman Bowen stated that if they approved this request, it would be setting a precedent. He said he did not want to see retail go down Rufe Snow. The motion carried 5-0 and the request was denied. Chairman Bowen stated the applicant has the right to appeal to the City Council. 2. PZ 86-39 Request of Rufe Snow/Chapman Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 3A2, William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, from its present classification of C-1 Commercial to C-2 Commercial. This property is located on the east side ·of Rufe Snow Drive, north of Chapman Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forwa~d. Arnold Pent came forward to represent the Joint. Venture. He stated he has . two users to go into the northern property. He said it was an auto parts store and a self service car wash and they are negotiating now for other automotive related tenants. Page 5 ( P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 I Ie. I I I I I I I 1 Ie PZ 86-39 APPROVED 3. PZ 86-40 I I I I I I I Ie 1_- ~'._. . . ( Mr. Wood asked what were the uses. Mr. Pent stated an auto parts and a car wash. Chairman Bowen asked what the others were. Mr. Pent stated they may have a nursery to sell plants. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in oPposition to th~ request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-39. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Alan W. Hamm to rezone Lot B-R, Block 11, Clearview Addition, from its present classification C-l Commercial to C-2 Commercial This property is located at t northwest corner of Grapevine H- way and Colorado Boulevard Chairman Bo opened the Public Hearing called for those wishing to skin favor of this request to ase come forward. Mr. Hamm, 5125 Davis Boulevard, came forward. He stated he wishes to up grade this property to give additional uses. He stated the property is bounded by C-l on both sides with an office supply, fast food restaurant and an auto supply. Mr. Hamm stated this zoning change would help with the leasing of the property, but some of the things allowed in C-2 he would not want. I Ie I I I I I 'I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( \. ( KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-F lOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 21, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PI 86-39 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-1 TO C-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 76 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~~l/V,·~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1402 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-39 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-1 to C-2. BEING a tract of land lying in the William Mann Survey, Abstract 1010, North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas; COMMENCING at a ~ inch iron rod located at the intersection of the existing east right-of-way line of Rufe Snow Drive (an 80 foot R.O.W.); THENCE North 00 degrees 10 minutes 49 seconds West, along the east R.O.W. line of Rufe Snow Drive, 914.87 feet to a point; THENCE North 89 degrees 54 minutes 05 seconds East, 15.00 feet to the point of beginning; THENCE North 00 degrees 10 minutes 49 seconds West, 270.13 feet to a point; THENCE North 89 degrees 54 minutes 05 seconds East, 205.00 feet to a point; THENCE North 00 degrees 10 minutes 48 seconds West, 122.32 feet to a point; THENCE North 89 degrees 54 minutes 05 seconds East, 195.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 00 degrees 10 minutes 47 seconds East, 338.46 feet to a point; THENCE South 89 degrees 54 minutes 09 seconds West, 195.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 00 degrees 10 minutes 48 seconds East, 53.99 feet to a point; THENCE South 89 degrees 54 minutes 05 -seconds West, 205.00 feet to the point of beginning and containing 121,374 square feet of 2.7864 acres of land. I Ie I , I I I I I. I . I I I I I I I ~ I Page 2 This property is located on the east side of Rufe Snow Drive, north of Chapman Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-39 IS HEREBY REZONED C-2 THIS 13th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY -....... I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I Planning and Development Department: .Ubject: I Council Meeting Date: Request of Alan W. Hamm to Rezone Lot BR, Block 11, ~learV1ew Add1t10n from L-l co C-2. Ordinance No. 1403 10/13/86 PZ 86-40 Agenda Number: I This Zoning Application is presented on the vacant commercial tract located on the northwest corner of Grapevine Highway and Colorado Boulevard. The requested rezoning is from C-l Commercial to C-2 Commercial. The applicant proposes to develop a retail strip center on the site and wishes to enlarge the possible uses for the proposed center. In discussion with the Commission the applicant offered to voluntarily restrict the additional uses allowed in the C-2 Commercial District to those which would be less objectionable to the neighborhood and the City. The applicant did not indicate that any prospective tenants had been contracted or secured for the proposed center. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Zoning Application PZ 86-40 requesting rezoning from C-l to C-2 on Lot BR, Block 11, Clearview Addition be approved with the stipulation that the applicant provide to the City Council the list of proposed uses which he would use from the C-2 criteria. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available !Z 11 rI-~~ City Manager , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I ( Ie I Page 5 p & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 1 I I I 1- 1 ~ 3. PZ 86-40 1 1 I I I I I f I ( Chairman Bowen were. Mr. Wood asked what were the Mr. Pent stated car wash. Mr. Pe stated they may have a y to sell plants. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-39. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Request of Alan W. Hamm to rezone Lot B-R, Block 11, Clearview Addition, from its present classification of C-l Commercial to C-2 Commercial. This property is located at the northwest corner of Grapevine Highway and Colorado Boulevard. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of this request to please come forward. Mr. Hamm, 5125 Davis Boulevard, came forward. He stated he wishes to up grade this property to give additional uses. He stated the property is bounded by C-1 on both sides with an office supply, fast food restaurant and an auto supply. Mr. Hamm stated this zoning change would help with the leasing of the property, but some of the things allowed in C-2 he would not want. I Page 6 ~. P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I ( Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in oPposition to this request to please come forward. Don Hughes, 8004 Standley, came forward. He asked what Mr. Hamm planned to do with the property directly behind his property. He said there is already a wall of bUildings. He said it would be getting away from the residential area. Chairman Bowen stated the property is already zoned C-l for retail uses. Mr. Tucker read from the Zoning Ordinance the list of what could be in C-l zoning. He stated it would not change the type of building he could have, just the uses within the bUilding. Chairman Bowen stated there were some objectionable uses in C-2. Jerry Apple, 8008 Standley, came forward. He stated there is a drainage problem in this area. He said it floods his back yard and is cracking the foundation. Mr. Apple stated his property is already 'isolated so that he can not sell his property, but the taxes still keep going up. Chairman Bowen stated the drainage would be taken care of in the platting process. He stated the drainage plan would have to be approved by the City Engineer. Mr. Apple stated he had called down to the city about his problem, but did not get the problem solved. Mr. Royston stated some of the neighbors do have a drainage problem. He said some would be solved with this development of Mr. Hamm's property, but some is caused by the lay of the land. I Ie I I I I I I I --~ ie' I I I I I I I Ie I ( Page 7 P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 PZ 86-40 APPROVED 4. PZ 86-41 5. PZ 86-42 ( Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-40 with the stipulation that a proposed list of permitted uses be selected prior to going to the City Council. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together, but would be voted on separately. Request of Campus Hill Joint Ve to rezone a portion of Tract L. Walker Survey, Abstract 165 t from present classifications 0 C-l Commercial and R-7-MF M ti-Family to C-2 Commercial. This roperty is located on Grapevi Highway across from the Tarrant ounty Junior College. Request to rezo Walke pre C ampus Hill Joint Venture a portion of Tract 3, L. C. urvey, Abstract 1653, from its nt classifications of C-l ercial and R-7-MF Multi-Family to -1 Industrial. This property is located on Grapevine Highway across from the Tarrant County Junior College. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Taylor Gandy, Attorney and part owner, came forward. He stated this is a 28 acre tract with 1700 foot frontage on Grapevine Highway. Mr. Gandy stated that most of the property is zoned C-l Commercial, but 5 or 6 acres are zoned Multi-Family. He stated he has had engineers and land planners working on this property. He showed a layout of the proposed zoning. I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I \) r KNOWL TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 20, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-40 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM C-l TO C-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 124 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~~ uJ.· RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 86-40 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I þ ORDINANCE NO. 1403 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-40 the fOllowing described property shall be rezoned from C-l to C-2. BEING Lot B-R, Block 11, Clearview Addition, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-165. Page 12, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. This property is located at the northwest corner of GrapeVine Highway and Colorado Boulevard. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. _" BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-40 IS HEREBY REZONED C-2 THIS 13th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986. ATTEST: MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS JÈANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: ubject: Request of Campus Hills Joint Venture to Rezone PZ 86-41 a t'ort10n of IraCt 3, L.C. walker Survey, Ab::slcacl 16Sf'genda Number: from C-I and R-7-MF to C-2. Ordinance No. 1404 Council Meeting Date: 10/13/86 This Zoning Application is submitted on the vacant commercial and multi-family tract located on the north side of Grapevine Highway east of Emerald Hills Way and facing the TCJC Northeast Campus. The requested rezoning is from C-l Commercial and R-7-MF Multi-Family to C-2 Commercial. The applicant proposes to combine the property in this application with the tract in Zoning Application PZ 86-42 to create a multi-use site. The subject tract in his application includes all of the applicant's frontage on Grapevine Highway. In the Staff review of the application several items were noted for Commission consideration. 1) The configuration of the proposed development does not match the existing zoning pattern. The net result of the proposed changes would be the elimination of the multi-family zoning from the applicant's property. 2) The development of the subject tract will require the construction of a thoroughfare street through the property. This proposed street is shown as a four lane Collector Street on the North Richland Hills Thoroughfare Plan and is an extension of Simmons Drive. The applicant has submitted a proposed layout of his property which includes the proposed street. Also the layout indicates the proposed street will align with the main drive entrance to TCJC across Grapevine Highway. e 3) The C-2 request is noted by the applicant to produce a wider range of available uses. The layout submitted with the application portrays several individual lot areas within the project site. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-41 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract 3, L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1653 from C-l and R-7-MF to C-2. Finance Review Source of Funds: I Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ I Operating Budget - e~ rÇ£- ~. 7t;~ - - - ~ Depa nt Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡( 1IJ/~ . Finance Director City Manager PaQe 1 of I ~~~"'''¡."ff__ .""r;f::i:1¡¡J :?--:-:;~,;~-- ,df7h I-I \ \ , , , , AG I \ F:F!~ . I ; I , ~ï Ie ~ i I , I I , I I I I , , I I I I . I Ie I ~ . I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( ( Page 7 P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 ~-~....,' Chairman Hearing. PZ 86-40 APPROVED · Schwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-40 with the stipulation that a proposed list of permitted uses be selected prior to going to the City Council. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together, but would be voted on separately. 4. ---. ---'" PZ 86-41 Request of Campus Hill Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 3, L. C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1653, from its present classifications of C-l Commercial and R-7-MF Multi-Family to C-2 Commercial. This property is located on Grapevine Highway across from the Tarrant County Junior College. 5. PZ 86-42 Request of Campus Hill Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 3, L. C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1653, from its present classifications of C-l Commercial and R-7-MF Multi-Family to I-I Industrial. This property is located on Grapevine Highway across from the Tarrant County Junior College. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Taylor Gandy, Attorney and part owner, came forward. He stated this is a 28 acre tract with 1700 foot frontage on Grapevin~ Highway. Mr. Gandy stated that most of the property is zoned C-l Commercial, but 5 or 6 acres are zoned Multi-Family. He stated he has had engineers and land planners working on this property. He showed a layout of the proposed zoning. I Page B p & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 ( ( Ie I Mr. Gandy stated he is asking for C-2 on all except the property next to the creek for which he is asking for I-I. He stated they do not have a use for the property at this time. Mr. Gandy stated there is a street proposed to line up with the entrance to the campus. He stated this property is located close to Mangham Airport which is zoned light industrial. Mr. Gandy stated there is not a market for the multi-family and will not be any time soon. He said this zoning would eliminate all of the multi-family on this tract. I I I I I Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in oPposition to this request to please come forward. I Ie There being no one Wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. PZ 86-41 APPROVED MS. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-41. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. I I PZ 86-42 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-42. This motion was seconded by . Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried -·5-0. I I I I I I- I Chairman Bowen stated the next 3 requests would be heard together voted on separately. 6. PZ 86-43 ay Development, Inc. to rez a portion of Tracts 1, 2, & , . A. Trimble Survey, ract 1520, from their present classifications of R-2 Single Family, R-7-MF-p~ Multi-Family Planned Development & OC Outdoor Commercial to R-2 Single Family. This is Tract 6 and is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive. I"~ Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ( (- KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas August 20, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-41 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM IC-1 AND R-7-MF1 TO C-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 106 We have received- the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. k/~w. ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 86-41 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I .... fÞ .' ORDINANCE NO. 1404 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-41 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-l and R-7-MF to C-2. BEING a tract of land situated in the L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1653, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, being a tract of land conveyed to Campus Hill Joint Venture as recorded in Volume 7809, Page 1700, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a ~ inch iron rod in the north line of State Highway No. 26 (Grapevine Highway a 100 foot R.O.W.), said iron rod being the southeast corner of Lot 2, Bloc~ 2, Walker Branch Addition, as recorded in Volume 388-156, Page 22, Tarrant County Plat Records; THENCE North 00 degrees 00 minutes 01 seconds East, 1017.59 feet to a point; THENCE North 89 degrees 56 minutes 10 seconds East, 638.80 feet to a point; THENCE North 45 degrees 14 minutes 39 seconds West, 4.8 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of 45 degrees 10 minutes 49 seconds, a radius of 819.00 feet, a tangent of 340.75 feet, a chord bearing North 22 degrees 39 minutes 14 seconds West, and a chord length of 629.22 feet; THENCE along said curve to the right 645.82 feet to the point of Tangency; THENCE North 00 degrees 03 minutes 50 seconds West, 27.23 feet to a point; THENCE North 89 degrees 56 minutes 10 seconds East, 828.05 feet to a point; THENCE South 00 degrees 25 minutes 32 seconds East, 396.04 feet to a point; THENCE South 44 degrees 45 minutes 21 seconds West, 1738.42 feet to the point of beginning and containing 975,304 square feet or 21.9 acres of land. ~ I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I Page 2 This property is located on Grapevine Highway across from the Tarrant County Junior College. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION , ~ OMMISSION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-41 IS HEREBY REZONED C-2 THIS 13th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: Council Meeting Date: Request of Campus Hill Joint Venture to Rezone f d N PZ 86-42 b 165 gen a umber: A ~ort10n of lract 3, L.C. walker Survey, A stracl from C-l and R-7-MF to I-I. Ordinance No. 1405 10/13/86 ~ ubject: This Zoning Application is also presented on a portion of the vacant commercial tract located on the north side of Grapevine Highway east of Emerald Hills Way across the highway from TCJC Northeast Campus. The requested rezoning is from C-l Commercial and R-7-MF Multi-Family to I-I Industrial. The subject tract is to be combined with the tract in Zoning Application PZ 86-41 to create a retail/office/warehouse complex. In reviewing the application the Staff noted two items for Commission consideration. 1) The extension of Simmons Drive as a four lane Collector Street will be a requirement of this development. The location and necessary right of way for the street are shown on the site layout submitted by the applicant. 2) A portion of the subject tract is in the Flood Plain of a Walker Branch tributary which is on the site. The applicant indicates future improvements will be made to the channel. The improvements to the channel and the providing of finish floor elevations for all proposed buildings will be a requirement of this development. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-42 requesting rezoning of a portion of Tract 3, L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1653, from C-l and R-7-MF to C-2. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available '7 ¡( 11<--1 ~ City Manager , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 1-' i I I , I I I I I I I I , , , , , I I I , I I I , , I . I . I [ -, \ ~ \ , , , AG: \ ~~~, \ I ' i I , I \ ?è - 8<.- 4"2.- ('-\ TQ AG I Ie I I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I Page 7 P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 ( ( Chairman Hearing. PZ 86-40 APPROVED chwinger made the motion to approve PZ 86-40 with the stipulation that a proposed list of permitted uses be selected prior to going to the City Council. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wood and the motion carried 5-0. 4. Chairman Bowen stated the next two requests would be heard together, but would be voted on separately. PZ 86-41 Request of Campus Hill Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 3, L. C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1653, from its present classifications of C-1 Commercial and R-7-MF Multi-Family to C-2 Commercial. This property is located on Grapevine Highway across from the Tarrant County Junior College. 5. PZ 86-42 Request of Campus Hill Joint Venture to rezone a portion of Tract 3, L. C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1653, from its present classifications of C-1 Commercial and R-7-MF Multi-Family to I-I Industrial. This property is located on Grapevine Highway across from the Tarrant County Junior College. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please Come forward. Taylor Gandy, Attorney and part owner, came forward. He stated this is a 28 acre tract with 1700 foot frontage on Grapevine Highway. Mr. Gandy stated that most of the property is zoned C-l Commercial, but 5 or 6 acres are zoned Multi-Family. He stated he has had engineers and land planners working on this property. He showed a layout of the proposed zoning. I Page 8 P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 ( Ie I I I I I I I Ie PZ 86-41 APPROVED I I I PZ 86-42 APPROVED I I 6. PZ 86-43 I I Ie I ( Mr. Gandy stated he is asking for C-2 on all except the property next to the creek for which he is asking for I-I. Re stated they do not have a use for the property at this time. Mr. Gandy stated there is a street proposed to line up with the entrance to the campus. He stated this property is located close to Mangham Airport which is zoned light industrial. Mr. Gandy stated there is not a market for the multi-family and will not be any time Soon. He said this zoning would eliminate all of the multi-family on this tract. Chairman Bowen called for those Wishing to speak in oPposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-41. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-42. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried -·5-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next requests would be heard toge voted on separately. Request of mond Bay Development, Inc. t ezone a portion of Tracts 1, 2 4A, W. A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from their present classifications of R-2 Single Family, R-7-MF-PD Multi-Family Planned Development & OC Outdoor Commercial to R-2 Single Family. This is Tract 6 and is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I_ I - .~ { \ r KNOWl TON-E NGlISH-FlOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 20, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-42 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM 'C-l AND R-7-MF' TO I-I REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 106 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~~()jr'~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RW AI r a Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 86-42 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I --....... ORDINANCE NO. 1405 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-42 the following described property shall be rezoned from C-l & R-7-MF to I-I. BEING a tract situated in the L.C. Walker Survey, Abstract 1653, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, being a tract of land conveyed to Campus Hill Joint Venture as recorded in Volume 7809, Page 1700, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a ~ inch iron rod in the north line of State Highway No. 26 (Grapevine Hwy. a 100 foot R.O.W.), said point being the southeast corner of Lot 2, Block 2, Wa!ker Branch Addition, as recorned in Volume 388-156, Page 22, Tarrant County Plat Records; THENCE North 00 degrees 00 minutes 01 seconds East, 1017.59 feet to the point of beginning; THENCE North 00 degrees 00 minutes 01 seconds East, 611.55 feet to a point; THENCE North 89 degrees 56 minutes 10 seconds East, 393.00 feet to a point; THENCE South 00 degrees 03 minutes 50 seconds East, 27.23 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a central angle of 45 degrees 10 minutes 49 seconds, a radius of 819.00 feet, a tangent length of 340.75 feet, a chord bearing South 22 degrees 39 minutes 15 seconds East, chord length 629.22; THENCE along said curve a distance of 645.82 feet to a point of tangency; THENCE South 45 degrees 14 minutes 39 seconds East, 4.80 feet to a point; THENCE South 89 degrees 56 minutes 10 seconds West, 638.80 feet to the point of beginning and containing 342,999 square feet or 6.54 acres of land. I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I Page 2 This property is located on Grapevine Highway across from the Tarrant County Junior College. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. C ~ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-42 IS HEREBY REZONED I-I THIS 13th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: I I I - Council Meeting Date: Request of Richmond Bay Development Inc., to Rezone PZ 86-43 a l:'orL10n of tract: 1, 2, and 4A, W.A. T.rlmblt:: 8u1.vt::y Agenda Number: Abstract 1520, from R-2, R-7-MF PD, and OC to R-2 Ordinance No. 1406 10/13/86 Subject: I I This Zoning Application is presented as one of three parcels of a coordinated rezoning request on the undeveloped portion of the Meadow Lakes Subdivision. This particular request is from R-2 Single Family, R-7-MF PD Multi-Family Planned Development, and DC Outdoor Commercial (Golf Course) to R-2 Single Family. The intent of the requested rezoning is to re-define the tract which is to be developed as single family residences. The change in configuration of the Single Family is coordinated with the overall scheme contained in this request and Zoning Application PZ 86-44 and PZ 86-45. The net change in the overall design will enlarge the single family area, remove the multi-family zoning in favor of townhouse development, and re-configure the property dedicated to the Golf Course to correspond with the current course layout. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-43 requesting rezoning of a portion of Tract 1, 2 and 4A, W.A. Trimble survey, Abstract 1520 from R-2, R-7-MF PD and DC to R-2 with the stipulation that the minimums in the proposed subdivision be 10,400 square Feet for the lots and 2000 square feet for the residences as shown on the Zoning Plat submitted with the application. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available rP 4JlJ~ City Manager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I I" I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I I" I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I Page 8 p & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 ( 6. PZ 86-43 ( Mr. Gandy stated he is asking for on all except the property next 0 the creek for which he is asking r I-I. He stated they do not have use for the property at this tim. Mr. Gandy stated there is a stre proposed to line up with the en ance to the campus. He state this property is located close Mangham Airport which is zoned lig industrial. Mr. Gandy stated the is not a market for the multi-f ily and will not be any time soon. He said this zoning would ele nate all of the multi-family on is tract. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-41. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-42. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried ,"5-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next 3 requests would be heard together, but voted on separately. Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 1, 2, & 4A, W. A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from their present classifications of R-2 Single Family, R-7-MF-PD Multi-Family Planned Development & OC Outdoor Commercial to R-2 Single Family. This is Tract 6 and is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive. I Page 9 ~ P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 ( Ie I 7. PZ 86-44 Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 1, 2, & 4A, w. A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from their present classifications of R-7-MF-PD Multi-Family Planned Development & OC Outdoor Commercial to R-6-T Townhouse. This is Tract 5 and is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive. I I I 8. PZ 86-45 Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 1, 2, & 4A, W. A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from their present classifications of OC Outdoor Commercial, R-2 Single Family, and R-7-MF-PD Multi-Family Planned Development to OC Outdoor Commercial. This property is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive. I 1- I ie·· Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. I I Marion Massey, Attorney, came forward. He stated they wish to change the zoning to take out the multi-family zoning and ask to leave 102 single family lots, 30 to 35 townhomes, and change the fairway of the golf course. I I Mr. Wood said he thinks it looks good. He asked if the outdoor commercial goes completely around the residential. I Mr. Massey showed the Commission a layout of the property. I I Ie I Mr. Wood asked if it goes around the lower lake and across the dam. Mr. Bob Frank came forward. He stated it does. . .....~;... .," "". I Page 10 ( P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I ( Chairman Bowen asked if the R-2 zoning would have 10,000 square foot lots and 2000 square foot homes. Mr. Frank said the lots would be 10,450 and the houses 2000 square feet. Chairman Bowen asked Mr. Royston if these requirements should be stated. Mr. Royston stated the PD has been eliminated and if you want restrictions, they should be stated. Mr. Massey said he would hope the Commission would not hold them to the restriction of no building permits till the golf course is in. He said he hoped that since there is no multi-family, they would not hold us to the construction of the golf course. Mr. Massey said they came fairly close to a date of development of the golf course. Mr. Frank said he guessed they could tie it to the townhomes. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. w. D. Clark, 6305 Riviera Drive, came forward. He stated he would like to know what is going to happen to the property behind his house. Mr. Wood said it would be single family. Mr. Clark asked if the single family would go. to the canal. Mr. Wood stated there is a parkway and then the single family. He showed Mr. Clark the layout. Mr. Clark asked who plans to maintain this property. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 11 ~ p & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 PZ 86-43 APPROVED PZ 86-44 APPROVED PZ 86-45 APPROVED 9. PZ 86-46 PZ 86-46 APPROVED ADJOURNMENT ( Mr. Frank stated he maintains it now, but it will be the homeowners association. Mr. Clark said Mr. Frank is doing a poor job maintaining it. Chairman Bowen told Mr. Clark that he should call the city if he has any complaints. Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 86-43 with the understanding that the lot size and square footage of the house be put on the plat. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-44 with the stipulation to continue the requirements related to the golf course as contained in the previous cases. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 5-0. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-45. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. Consideration of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding R-7-MF District. Chairman Bowen stated is amendment would change the nned Development to allow am· um of 20 units. made the motion to approve 6-46. This motion was seconded by Nash and the motion carried 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I l"- \ ( KNOWl TON-ENGLISH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas August 21, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PI 86-43 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM IR-2, R-7-MF-PD, DC I TO R-2 REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 128 We have received the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~w W, ~ RICHARD w. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 86-43 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE NO. 1406 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-43 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-2, R-7-MF-PD & OC to R-2. / -~ BEING a tract of land situated in the W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod at the northwest corner of Lot 41, Block 3, Meadow Lakes First Filing as recorded in Volume 388-124, Page 27, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 32 degree$ 47 minutes 23 seconds East, along the west line of said Meadow Lakes First Filing, a distance of 406.83 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 74 degrees 12 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 225.13 feet to an iron rod at the beginning a non-tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 28 degrees 16 minutes 27 seconds, a radius of 140.00 feet, a tangent length of 35.26 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of South 48 degrees_20 minutes 23 seconds West, 68.39 feet; THENCE southwesterly along said non-tangent curve to the right, an arc distance of 69.09 feet, to an iron rod at the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 54 degrees 32 minutes 23 seconds, a radius of 100 feet, and a tangent length of 51.55 feet; THENCE southwesterly along said curve, an arc distance of 95.19 feet to an iron rod at the end of the said curve; THENCE South 07 degrees 56 minutes 14 seconds West, a distance of 96.09 feet to an iron at the beginning qf a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 24 degrees 59 minutes 22 seconds, a radius of 189.00 feet, and a tangent length of 41.88 feet; THENCE southwesterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 82.43 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 40 degrees 06 minutes 37 seconds East, a distance of 356.57 feet to an iron rod for corner; I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 2 THENCE South 23 degrees 26 minutes 48 seconds West, a distance of 88.79 feet to án iron rod for corner; THENCE South 50 degrees 13 minutes 21 seconds West, a distance of 32.85 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 70 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 129.59 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 80 degrees 40 minutes 10 seconds West, a distance of 124.38 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 40 degrees 06 minutes 37 seconds West, a distance of 246.06 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 85 degrees 13 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 482.62 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 85 degrees 36 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 231.88 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 73 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds West, a distance of 186.27 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 69 degrees 47 minutes 15 seconds West, a distance of 161.81 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 37 minutes 56 seconds West, a distance of 84.53 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 16 degrees 46 minutes 41 seconds West, a distance of 113.77 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 34 degrees 58 mjnutes 54 seconds West, a distance of 50.00 feet to a point; said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 18 degrees 42 minutes 58 seconds, a radius of 150.00 feet, a tangent length of 24.72 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of South 13 degrees 15 minutes 06 seconds East, 48.78 feet; THENCE Northerly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 49.00 feet to a point at the end of said curve, said point being the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 13 degrees 46 minutes 48 seconds, a radius of 575.00 feet, and a tangent length of 69.48 feet; THENCE Northwesterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 138.29 feet to a point at the end of said curve, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 13 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds, a radius of 400.00 feet, a tangent length of 39.31 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of North 51 degrees 17 minutes 22 seconds East, 78.25 feet; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 78.38 feet to a point at the end of said curve; I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I Ie I Page 3 THENCE North 45 degrees 40 minutes 34 seconds East, a distance of 194.47 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 44 degrees 19 minutes 26 seconds West, a distance of 180.00 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 44 degrees 19 minutes 26 seconds West, a distance of 169.61 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 95 degrees 36 minutes 38 seconds, a radius of 110.00 feet, and a tangent length of 121.33 feet; THENCE Northwesterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 183.55 feet to an iron rod at the end of said curve; THENCE North 51 degrees 17 minutes 02 seconds East, a distance of 64.45 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 11 degrees 40 minutes 14 seconds, a radius of 375.00 feet and a tangent length of 38.32 feet; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 76.38 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 11 degrees 40 minutes 14 seconds, a radius of 425.00 feet, and a tangent length of 43.43 feet; thence Northeasterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 86.57 feet to an iron.~od at the end of said curve; THENCE North 51 degrees 17 minutes 02 seconds East, a distance of 21.98 feet to an iron rod for corner; said iron rod being on the south R.O.W. line of a 75-foot wide Texas Electric Service Company R.O.W. as recorded in Volume 2868, Page 449, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 71 degrees 58 minutes 07 seconds East, along the south R.O.W. line of said Texas Electric Service Company R.O.W., a distance of 141.55 feet to an iron rod for corner; said iron rod being on the west R.O.W. line of Meadow Lakes Drive (an 80-foot R.O.W.); THENCE South 38 degrees 42 minutes 58 seconds East, along the southwesterly R.O.W. of Meadow Lakes Drive, a distance of 176.35 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 24 degrees 10 minutes 38 seconds, a radius of 298.85 feet, and a tangent length of 64.01 feet; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 126.11 feet to an iron rod at the:end of said. curve; THENCE South 62 degrees 53 minutes 36 seconds East, a distance of 25.54 feet to an iron rod for an angle point; THENCE South 62 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 129.86 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 59 degrees 13 minutes 53 seconds, a radius of 1027.27 feet, and a tangent length of 583.94 feet; I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I Ie I Page 4 THENCE Easterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 1061.97 feet to an iron rod at the point of beginning and containing 33.2958 acres of land. Save and accept the following golf course tract being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at an iron rod at the northwest corner of Lot 41, Block 3, Meadow Lakes First Filing as recorded in Volume 388-124, Page 27, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; said iron rod also being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 10 degrees 06 minutes 19 seconds, a radius of 1027.27 feet, a tangent length of 90.82 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of South 63 degrees 01 minutes 53 seconds West, 180.94 feet; THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the right and along the south R.O.W. line of Meadow Lakes Drive (an 80-foot R.O.W.), an arc distance of 181.18 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE South 32 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 135.00 feet to the point of beginning; THENCE South 32 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 93.13 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 95 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds, a radius of 90.00 feet, and a tangent length of 98.68 feet; THENCE Southerly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 149.64 feet to an iron rod at the end of said curve; said iron rod also being the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 54 degrees 32 minutes 23 seconds, a radius of 150.00 feet, and a tangent length of 77.32 feet; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 142.78 feet to an iron rod at the end of said curve; THENCE South 07 degrees 56 minutes 14 seconds West, a distance of 42.09 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 77 degrees 38 minutes 58 seconds West, a distance of 184.86 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 85 degrees 13 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 701.09 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 44 degrees 19 minutes 26 seconds West, a distance of 803.05 feet to an iron rod for corner; said iron rod also being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 11 degrees 40 minutes 14 seconds, a radius of 425.00 feet, a tangent length of 43.43 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of North 45 degrees 26 minutes 55 seconds East, 86.42 feet; I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I Page 5 Thence Northeasterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 86.57 feet to an iron rod at the end of said curve; said iron rod also being the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 11 degrees 40 minutes 14 seconds, a radius of 375.00 feet, and a tangent length of 38.32 feet; THENCE Northeasterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 76.38 feet to an iron rod at the end of said curve; THENCE North 51 degrees 17 minutes 02 seconds East, a distance of 19.41 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 38 degrees 42 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of 176.35 feet to an iron rod; said iron rod being the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 24 degrees 10 minutes 38 seconds, a radius of 433.85 feet, and a tangent length of 92.92 feet; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 183.07 feet to an iron rod at the end of said curve; THENCE South 62 degrees 53 minutes 36 seconds East, a distance of 25.42 feet to an iron rod for an angle point; THENCE South 62 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 129.74 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 50.degrees 24 minutes 07 seconds, a radius of 1162.27 feet, and a tangent length of 546.95 feet; THENCE Easterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 1022.43 feet to an iron rod at the point of beginning and containing 9.9332 acres of land. The net acreage of said tract of land after subtracting the save and accept area of the golf course is 23.3626 acres of land. This property is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive, west of Rufe Snow Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. £.~~ CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I Page 6 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-43 IS HEREBY REZONED R-2 THIS 13th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development 10/13/86 Council Meeting Date: Request of Richmond Bay Development Inc., to Rezone PZ 86-44 a Port:10n of Tract: 1, 2, and 4A, w. A. Ir Imbl~ SUI. vt;;.y, Agenda Number: Abstract 1520 from R-7-MF PD and OC to R-6T Ordinance No. 1407 This Zoning Application is the second of three applications presented by Richmond Bay Development Company on the undeveloped portion of the property in the Meadow Lakes Subdivision. The requested rezoning is from R-7-MF PD Multi-Family Planned Development and OC Outdoor Commercial (Golf Course) to R-6-T Townhome. The applicants wish to scale down their project to eliminate any consideration of apartment development. Their intent is to concentrate on patio home type housing. The proposed rezoning also reduces significantly the area of the site dedicated to multi-family housing. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-44 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract 1, 2, and 4A, W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520 from R-7-MF PD and OC to R-6-T with the stipulation that the provisions for guaranteeing the construction of the Golf Course be continued as a condition of building in this district. , Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) a Operating Budget - -C;Z Z ~ J~ ~/f¡{- ~ - -. Departmen He-ad Signature ' City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I" I I lit I I I I I I I I" I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie II ( Page 8 p & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 6. PZ 86-43 ( Mr. Gandy stated he is asking for on all except the property next creek for which he is asking f He stated they do not have use for the property at this time Mr. Gandy stated there is a stre proposed to line up with the ent nee to the campus. He state his property is located close t angham Airport which is zoned l1gh industrial. Mr. Gandy stated the is not a market for the multi-fa ly and will not be any time soon. e said this zoning would eli nate all of the multi-family on - t s tract. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. MS. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-41. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-42. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried ,5-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next 3 requests would be heard together, but voted on separately. Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 1, 2, & 4A, W. A. Trimble ,Survey, Abstract 1520, from their present classifications of R-2 Single Family, R-7-MF-Pp Multi-Family Planned Development & OC Outdoor Commercial to R-2 Single Family. This is Tract 6 and is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive. I Page 9 ~ P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 Ie I 7. PZ 86-44 I I I 8. PZ 86-45 I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I ( Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 1, 2, & 4A, W. A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from their present classifications of R-7-MF-PD Multi-Family Planned Development & OC Outdoor Commercial to R-6-T Townhouse. This is Tract 5 and is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive. Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 1, 2, & 4A, W. A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from their present classifications of OC Outdoor Commercial, R-2 Single Family, and R-7-MF-PD Multi-Family Planned Development to OC Outdoor Commercial. This property is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive. . . Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Marion Massey, Attorney, came forward. He stated they wish to change the zoning to take out the multi-family zoning and ask to leave 102 single family lots, 30 to 35 townhomes, and change the fairway of the golf course. Mr. Wood said he thinks it looks good. He asked if the outdoor commercial goes completely around the residential. Mr. Massey showed the Commission a layout of the property. Mr. Wood asked if it goes around the lower lake and across the dam. Mr. Bob Frank came forward. He stated it does. I Ie I I I I I I I :- --5- --. I I I I I I I Ie I Page 10 ~ P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 ( Chairman Bowen asked if the R-2 zoning would have 10,000 square foot lots and 2000 square foot homes. Mr. Frank said the lots would be 10,450 and the houses 2000 square feet. Chairman Bowen asked Mr. Royston if these requirements should be stated. Mr. Royston stated the PD has been eliminated and if you want restrictions, they should be stated. Mr. Massey said he would hope the Commission would not hold them to the restriction of no building permits till the golf course is in. He said he hoped that since there is no multi-family, they would not hold us to the construction of the golf course. Mr. Massey said they came fairly close to a date of development of the golf course. Mr. Frank said he guessed they could tie it to the townhomes. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. w. D. Clark, 6305 Riviera Drive, came forward. He stated he would like to know what is going to happen to the property behind his house. Mr. Wood said it would be single family. Mr. Clark asked if the single family would go. to the canal. Mr. Wood stated there is a parkway and then the single family. He showed Mr. Clark the layout. Mr. Clark asked who plans to maintain this property. I Ie I Page 11 ~ p & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 ( Mr. Frank stated he maintains it now, but it will be the homeowners association. I I Mr. Clark said Mr. Frank is doing a poor job maintaining it. Chairman Bowen told Mr. Clark that he should call the city if he has any complaints. I I Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. PZ 86-43 APPROVED -- Ms. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 86-43 with the understanding that the lot size and square footage of the house be put on the plat. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. I I lit PZ 86-44 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-44 with the stipulation to continue the requirements related to the golf course as contained in the previous cases. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 5-0. I PZ 86-45 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-45. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. I I I 9. PZ 86-46 Consideration of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding R-7-MF District. I Chairman Bowen stated is amendment would change the nned Development to allow a ma · um of 20 units. PZ 86-46 APPROVED made the motion to approve 6-46. This motion was seconded by Nash and the motion carried 5-0. I I Ie I ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:30 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I f I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas August 21, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-44 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM 'R-7-MF-PD & Oct TO R-6-T REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 128 We have received' the referenced zoni ng case for our revi ew and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. ~ J~rhJ W. ~ RICHARD W. ALBIN, P.E. RWA/ra Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City t~anager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 86-44 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I ~ ORDINANCE NO. 1407 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-44 the following described property shall be rezoned from R-7-MF-PD and OC to R-6-T. BEING a tract of land situated in the W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at an iron rod at the northwest corner of Lot 41, Block 3, Meadow Lakes First Filing as recorded in Volume 388-124, Page 27, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 32 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East, along the west line of said Meadow Lakes First Filing, a distance of 406.83 feet to an iron rod for corner; I I I I I I I f I THENCE South 74 degrees 12 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 225.13 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 28 degrees 16 minutes 27 seconds, a radius of 140.00 feet, a tangent length of 35.26 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of South 48 degrees.20 mi~te~ 23 seconds West, 68.39 feet; THENCE southwesterly along said non-tangent curve to the right, an arc distance of 69.09 feet, to an iron rod at the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 54 degrees 32 minutes 23 seconds, a radius of 100 feet, and a tangent length of 51.55 feet; THENCE southwesterly along said curve, an arc distance of 95.19 feet to an iron rod at the end of the said curve; THENCE South 07 degrees 56 minutes 14 seconds West, a distance of 96.09 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 24 degrees 59 minutes 22 seconds, a radius of 189.00 feet, and a tangent length of 41.88 feet; THENCE southwesterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 82.43 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 40 degrees 06 minutes 37 seconds East, a distance of 356.57 feet to an iron rod for corner; I Page 2 1_ THENCE South 23 degrees 26 minutes 48 seconds West, a distance of 88.79 I feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 50 degrees 13 minutes 21 seconds West, a distance of 32.85 I feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 70 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 129.59 feet to an iron rod for corner; I THENCE North 80 degrees 40 minutes 10 seconds West, a distance of 124.38 feet to an iron rod for corner; I THENCE North 40 degrees 06 minutes 37 seconds West, a distance of 246.06 feet to an iron rod for corner; I THENCE North 85 degrees 13 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 482.62 feet to an iron rod for corner; I THENCE South 85 degrees 36 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 231.88 feet to an iron rod for corner; I THENCE South 73 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds West, a distance of 186.27 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 69 degrees 47 minutes 15 seconds West, a distance of 161.81 Ie feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 89 degrees 37 minutes 56 seconds West, a distance of 84.53 I feet to the point of beginning; THENCE North 89 degrees 37 minutes 56 seconds West, a distance of 277.00 I feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 75 degrees 31 minutes '14 ieconds West, a distance of 104.83 feet to an iron rod for corner; I THENCE North 57 degrees 24 minutes 46 seconds West, a distance of 259.02 feet to an iron rod for corner; I THENCE North 18 degrees 35 minutes 53 seconds West, a distance of 96.17 feet to an iron rod for corner; I THENCE North 62 degrees 14 minutes 40 seconds East, a distance of 484.65 feet to an iron rod for corner; I THENCE North 45 degrees 40 minutes 34 seconds East, a distance of 128.48 feet to an iron rod for corner; I THENCE North 44 degrees 19 minutes 26 seconds West, a distance of 50.00 feet to an iron rod for corner; {' THENCE North 45 degrees 40 minutes 34 seconds East, a distance of 105.00 feet to an iron rod for corner; I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I Page 3 THENCE South 44 degrees 19 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 180.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 45 degrees 40 minutes 34 seconds West, a distance of 194.47 feet to a point at the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 13 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds, a radius of 400.00 feet, and a tangent length of 39.31 feet; THENCE southwesterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 78.38 feet to a point at the end of said curve; said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 13 degrees 46 minutes 48 seconds, a radius of 575.00 feet, a tangent length of 69.48 feet, and a chord bearing a distance of South 29 degrees 29 minutes 59 seconds East, 137.96 feet; THENCE southeasterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 138.29 feet to a point at the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 18 degrees 42 minutes 58 seconds, a radius of 150.00 feet, and a tangent length of 24.72 feet -- - THENCE southeasterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 86.57 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE South 34 degrees 58 minutes 54 seconds East, a distance of 50.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 16 degrees 46 minutes 41 seconds East, a distance of 113.77 feet to the point of beginning and containing 4.7764 acres of land. This property is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive, west of Rufe Snow Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND 1986. Y OF SEPTEMBER, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-44 IS HEREBY REZONED R-6-T THIS 13th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I I I I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: 10-13-86 Subject: _ Council Meeting Date: Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. PZ 86-45 to Rezone a .Portl.on ot Tract 1, 2, and 4A, W.A. Tr1mbleAgendaNumber: Survey, Abstract 1520 from R-2, R-7-MF PD, and OC to OC Ordinance No. 1408 This Zoning Application is presented on the third parcel of property belonging to the Richmond Bay Development Inc. in the undeveloped portion of Meadow Lakes Subdivision. The requested rezoning is from R-2 Single Family, R-7-MF PD Multi-Family Planned Development and OC Outdoor Commercial (Golf Course) to OC Outdoor Commercial (Golf Course). The intent of the requested rezoning is to re-configure the property needed on which to construct the Golf Course to match the current course layout. The proposed request is in two parcels which effectively surround the proposed single family and townhome requests in PZ 86-43 and PZ 86-44. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Zoning Application PZ 86-45 requesting rezoning on a portion of Tract 1, 2, and 4A W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520 from R-2, R-7-MF PD, and OC to ac. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Ot r Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available f 11 Y-~ City Manager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I II I - I I I I I I I' I R-7-MF C-2 "64 1 ( Page 8 p & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 Ie I 1 I 1 I 'I 1 Ie 1 1 1 I 6. PZ 86-43 1 I I f' I - ( Mr. Gandy stated he is asking for C on all except the property next the creek for which he is asking f I-I. He stated they do not have se for the property at this time Mr. Gandy stated there is a stre proposed to line up with the ent nce to the campus. He state his property is located close t ngham Airport which is zoned lig industrial. Mr. Gandy stated the is not a market for the multi-f 1ly and will not be any time Soon. e said this zoning would el nate all of the multi-family on is tract. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in oPposition to this request to please come forward. There being no one wishing to speak, the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-41. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-42. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried ·5-0. Chairman Bowen stated the next 3 requests would be heard together, but voted on separately. Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 1, 2, & 4A, W. A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from their present classifications of R-2 Single Family, R-7-MF-pp Multi-Family Planned Development & OC Outdoor Commercial to R-2 Single Family. This is Tract 6 and is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive. I Page 9 p & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 Ie I 7. PZ 86-44 I I I 8. PZ 86-45 I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I ... ( ( Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 1, 2, & 4A, W. A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from their present classifications of R-7-MF-PD Multi-Family Planned Development & OC Outdoor Commercial to R-6-T Townhouse. This is Tract 5 and is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive. Request of Richmond Bay Development, Inc. to rezone a portion of Tracts 1, 2, & 4A, W. A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, from their present classifications of OC Outdoor Commercial, R-2 Single Family, and R-7-MF-PD Multi-Family Planned Development to OC Outdoor Commercial. This property is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive west of Rufe Snow Drive. Chairman Bowen opened the Public Hearing and called for those wishing to speak in favor of these requests to please come forward. Marion Massey, Attorney, came forward. He stated they wish to change the zoning to take out the multi-family zoning and ask to leave 102 single family lots, 30 to 35 townhomes, and change the fairway of the golf course. Mr. Wood said he thinks it looks good. He asked if the outdoor commercial goes completely around the residential. Mr. Massey showed the Commission a layout of the property. Mr. Wood asked if it goes around the lower lake and across the dam. Mr. Bob Frank came forward. He stated it does. I Page 10 ( P & Z Minutes ~ September 11, 1986 I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I f I ( Chairman Bowen asked if the R-2 zoning would have 10,000 square foot lots and 2000 square foot homes. Mr. Frank said the lots would be 10,450 and the houses 2000 square feet. Chairman Bowen asked Mr. Royston if these requirements should be stated. Mr. Royston stated the PD has been eliminated and if you want restrictions, they should be stated. Mr. Massey said he would hope the Commission would not hold them to the restriction of no building permits till the golf course is in. He said he hoped that since there is no multi-family, they would not hold us to the construction of the golf course. Mr. Massey said they came fairly close to a date of development of the golf course. Mr. Frank said he guessed they could tie it to the townhomes. Chairman Bowen called for those wishing to speak in opposition to this request to please come forward. w. D. Clark, 6305 Riviera Drive, came forward. He stated he would like to know what is going to happen to the property behind his house. Mr. Wood said it would be single family. Mr. Clark asked if the single family would go ·to the canal. Mr. Wood stated there is a parkway and then the single family. He showed Mr. Clark the layout. Mr. Clark asked who plans to maintain this property. , . . I Ie I Page 11 ( P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 ( I I I Mr. Frank stated he maintains it now, but it will be the homeowners association. Mr. Clark said Mr. Frank is doing a poor job maintaining it. Chairman Bowen told Mr. Clark that he should call the city if he has any complaints. I Chairman Bowen closed the Public Hearing. PZ 86-43 APPROVED -- /" MS. Nash made the motion to approve PZ 86-43 with the understanding that the lot size and square footage of the house be put on the plat. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. I I --.. PZ 86-44 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-44 with the stipulation to continue the requirements related to the golf course as contained in the previous cases. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 5-0. I I I I I I I Ie I PZ 86-45 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-45. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. 9. PZ 86-46 Consideration of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080 regardin R-7-MF District. PZ 86-46 APPROVED Chairman Bowen state his amendment th anned Development imum of 20 units. ADJOURNMENT made the motion to approve 86-46~ This motion was seconded by Nash and the motion carried 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission - I Ie I I I I I I I lit I I I I I I I Ie I - ( KNOWL TON-ENGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENCINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas August 21, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-002, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ZONING CASE PZ 86-45 REVIEW LETTER, ZONING FROM ·OC, R-2, R-7-MF-PO· TO DC REF. UTILITY SYSTEM GRID SHEET NO. 128 We have received' the referenced zoning case for our review and find that we could adequately locate this property on the Zoning Map as required for updating should this case be passed by both the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council. W: r1tL:- P.E. RW AI r a Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Richard Royston, Director of Development Zoning Review PZ 86-45 Page 1 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I Ie I I I I I I I P I I I I I I I f I ORDINANCE NO. 1408 AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XXVIII, AMENDMENTS, OF ZONING ORDINANCE #1080 OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, JANUARY 9, 1984 AFTER APPROPRIATE NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: RESOLVED that on Case No. PZ-86-45 the following described property shall be rezoned from OC, R-2, and R-7-MF-PD to OC. TRACT 2 BEING a tract of land situated in the Heirs of S. Sawyer Survey, Abstract 1425, and the W. A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at an iron rod at the intersection of the east right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 377, also known as Denton Highway (al00-foot R.O.W.), and the southerly R.O.W. line. of the St. Louis Southwestern Railroad (a 100 foot R.O.W.) said point being 532.89 feet North 00 degrees 22 minutes 09 seconds East, of the northwest corner of the Diamond Oaks North Addition, an addition to the City of Haltom City, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-23, Page 25, Map Records, Tarrant County, Texas; said point also being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 16 degrees 59 minutes 14 seconds, a radius of 2308.72 feet, a tangent length of 344.78 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of North 64 degrees 11 minutes 34 seconds East, 682~00 feet; THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the right and said southerly R.O.W. line of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad, an arc distance of 684.50 feet to an iron rod at the end of said curve; THENCE North 72 degrees 41 minutes 11 seconds East, along said southeasterly R.O.W. line of the St. Louis and Southwestern Railroad, a distance of 1087.64 feet to an iron rod for corner in the common City Limit line between Haltom City and North Richland Hills; THENCE South 44 degrees 24 minutes OQ seconds East, along said common City Limit line, a distance of 131.52 feet to an iron rod at the point of beginning; said point being in the southerly line of 75-foot Texas Electric Service Company R.O.W. as recorded in Volume 2868, Page 449, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 71 degrees 58 minutes 07 seconds East, along the southerly line of said 75-foot Texas Electric Service Company R.O.W., a distance of 1645.27 feet to a point for corner; I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I Page" 2 THENCE South 51 degrees 17 minutes 02 seconds West, a distance of 21.98 feet to a point; said point being the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 11 degrees 40 minutes 14 seconds, a radius of 425.00 feet, and a tangent length of 43.43 feet; THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 86.57 feet to a point at the end of said curve; said point being the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 11 degrees 40 minutes 14 seconds, a radius of 375.00 feet, and a tangent length of 38.32 feet; THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 76.38 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE South 51 degrees 17 minutes 02 seconds West, a distance of 64.45 feet to a point; said point being the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 95 degrees 36 minutes 38 seconds, a radius of 110.00 feet and a tangent length of 121.33 feet; THENCE Southerly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 183.55 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE South 44 degrees 19 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 169.61 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 45 degrees 40 minutes 34 seconds West, a distance of 105.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 44 degrees 19 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 50.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 45 degrees 40 minutes 34 seconds West, a distance of 128.48 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 62 degrees 14 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of 484.65 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 18 degrees 35 minutes 53 seconds East, a distance of 96.17 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 57 degrees 24 minutes 46 seconds East, a distance of 259.02 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 75 degrees 31 minutes 14 seconds East, a distance of 104.83 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 37 minutes 56 seconds East, a distance of 361.53 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 69 degrees 47 minutes 15 seconds East, a distance of 161.81 feet to a point for corner; I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I I Page 3 THENCE North 73 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds East, a distance of 186.21 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 85 degrees 36 minutes 38 seconds East, a distance of 231.88 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 85 degrees 13 minutes 49 seconds East, a distance of 482.62 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 40 degrees 06 minutes 37 seconds East, a distance of 246.06 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 80 degrees 40 minutes 10 seconds East, a distance of 124.38 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 70 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 129.59 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 50 degrees 13 minutes 21 seconds East, a distance of 32.85 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 23 degrees 26 minutes 48 seconds East, a distance of 88.79 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 40 degrees 06 minutes 37 seconds West, a distance of 356.57 feet to a point, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 24 degrees 59 minutes 22 seconds, a radius of 189.00 feet, a tangent length of 41.88 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of South 20 degrees 25 minutes 55 seconds West, 81.78 feet; THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 82.43 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE North 07 degrees 56 minutes 14 seconds East, a distance of 96.09 feet to a point at the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 54 degrees 32 minutes 23 seconds, a radius of 100.00 feet, and a tangent length of 51.55 feet; THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 95.19 feet to a point at the end of said curve, said point also being the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 28 degrees 16 minutes 27 seconds, a radius of 140.00 feet, and a tangent length of 51.55 feet; THENCE northeasterly along said curve. to the left, an arc distance of 69.09 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE North 74 degrees 12 minutes 49 seconds East, a distance of 225.13 feet to a point being on the westerly lot line of Lot 38, Block 3, Meadow Lakes First Filing, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-123, Page 27, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and also being 406.83 feet. South 32 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East, from the southeasterly R.O.W. line of Meadow Lakes Drive (an 80-foot R.O.W.); I ~ I I I I I 'I I ~ I I I I I I I f I Page 4 THENCE South 32 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East, along the west line of said Meadow Lakes First Filing, a distance of 29.80 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 65 degrees 05 minutes 28 seconds West, a distance of 285.00 feet to a angle point; THENCE South 09 degrees 05 minutes 28 seconds West, a distance of 193.00 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 40 degrees 54 minutes 32 seconds East, a distance of 319.57 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 28 degrees 28 minutes 13 seconds West, a distance of 173.22 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 70 degrees 01 minutes 28 seconds West, a distance of 172.01 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 84 degrees 58 minutes 57 seconds West, a distance of 162.99 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 47 degrees 04 minutes 25 seconds West, a distance of 101.56 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 29 degrees 47. minutes 24 seconds West, a distance of 59.88 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 48 degrees 54 minutes 31 seconds, a distance of 44.15 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 78 degrees 12 minutes 36 seconds West, a distance of 75.46 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 83 degrees 45 minutes 23 seconds West, a distance of 45.88 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 88 degrees 22 minutes 08 seconds West, a distance of 336.70 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 85 degrees 00 minutes 38 seconds West, a distance of 60.25 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 76 degrees 33 minutes 17 seconds West, a distance of 24.02 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 47 degrees 47 minutes 43 seconds West, a distance of 27.28 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 15 degrees 26 minutes 56 seconds West, a distance of 29.36 feet to an angle point; I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I Page 5 THENCE South 04 degrees 52 minutes 33 seconds East, a distance of 83.93 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 40 degrees 49 minutes 49 seconds East, a distance of 81.40 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 44 degrees 08 minutes 51 seconds East, a distance of 50.11 feet to an angle point; THENCE South 00 degrees 43 minutes 40 seconds East, a distance of 55.65 feet to an iron rod for corner; said point being the northeast corner of Lot 46, Block 4 of Fossil Creek Trails First Filing, an addition to the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-87, Pages 46-47, Map Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89 degrees 16 minutes 21 seconds West, along the North line of said Fossil Creek Trails First Filing, a distance of 536.40 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a curve to the right having a central angle of 27 degrees 50 minutes 19 seconds, a radius of 343.34 feet, and a tangent length of 85.09 feet; THENCE northwesterly along said curve to the right and said north line of Fossil Creek Trails First Filing, an arc distance of 166.82 feet to an iron rod for corner; said point being the northwest corner of Lot 53, Block 4 of said Fossil Creek Trails First Filing; THENCE South 27 degrees 06 minutes 42 seconds West, along the westerly line of said Fossil Creek Trails First Filing, a distance of 190.00 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a central angle 53 degrees 20 minutes 14 seconds, a radius of 60.00 feet, a tangent length of 30.14 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of South 83 degrees 46 minutes 49 seconds West, 53.86 feet; THENCE sout~esterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 55.85 feet to a point at the end- of said curve; THENCE South 27 degrees 06 minutes 42 seconds ~st, on a line 45.00 feet westerly of an parallel to said westerly line of Fossil Creek Trails First Filing, a distance of 211.00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 16 minutes 21 seconds West, a distance of 233.37 feet to a point for corner in the common City Limit line of Haltom City and North Richland Hills; said point also being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 42 degrees 19 minutes 01 seconds, a radius of 489.12 feet, a tangent length of 189.31 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of North 21 degrees 52 minutes 48 seconds West, 353.10 feet; THENCE northwesterly along said non-tangent curve to the left and said common City Limit line, an arc distance of 361.25 feet to a point at the end of said curve; I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I Page 6 THENCE North 42 degrees 52 minutes 58 seconds West, along said common City Limit line, a distance of 449.92 feet to an angle point; THENCE North 44 degrees 24 minutes 06 seconds West, along said common City Limit line, a distance of 851.22 feet to the point of beginning and containing 35.9757 acres of land. TRACT 3 BEING a tract of land situated in the W.A. Trimble Survey, Abstract 1520, City of North Richland Hills, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at an iron rod at the northwest corner of Lot 41, Block 3, Meadow Lakes First Filing as recorded in Volume 388-124, Page 27, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; said iron rod also being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 10 degrees 06 minutes 19 seconds, a radius of 1027.27 feet, a tangent length of 90.82 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of South 63 degrees 01 minutes 53 seconds West, 180.94 feet; THENCE Southwesterly along said curve to the right and along the south R.O.W. line of Meadow Lakes Drive (an 80-foot R.O.W.), an arc distance of 181.18 feet to a point at the end of said curve; THENCE South 32 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 135.00 feet to the point of beginning; THENCE South 32 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 93.13 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 95 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds, a radius of 90.00 feet, and a tangent length of 98.68 feet; THENCE southerly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 149.64 feet to an iron rod at the end of said curve; said iron rod also being the beginning of a tangent curve to -the left having a central angle of 54 degrees 32 minutes 23 seconds, a radius of 150.00 feet, and a tangent length of 77.32 feet; THENCE southeasterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 142.78 feet to an iron rod at the end of said curve; THENCE South 07 degrees 56 minutes 14 seconds West, a distance of 42.09 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 77 degrees 38 minutes 58. seconds Wes.t, a distance of 184.86 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE North 85 degrees 13 minutes 49 seconds West, a distance of 701.09 feet to an iron rod for corner; I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I Page 7 THENCE North 44 degrees 19 minutes 26 seconds West, a distance of 803.05 feet to an iron rod for corner; said iron rod also being the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 11 degrees 40 minutes 14 seconds, a radius of 425.00 feet, a tangent length of 43.43 feet, and a chord bearing and distance of North 45 degrees 26 minutes 55 seconds East, 86.42 feet; THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 86.57 feet to an iron rod at the end of said curve; said iron rod also being the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a central angle of 11 degrees 40 minutes 14 seconds, a radius of 375.00 feet, and a tangent length of 38.32 feet; THENCE northeasterly along said curve to the right, an arc distance of 76.38 feet to an iron rod at the end of said curve; THENCE North 51 degrees 17 minutes 02 seconds East, a distance of 19.41 feet to an iron rod for corner; THENCE South 38 degrees 42 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of 176.35 feet to an iron rod; said iron rod being the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 24 degrees 10 minutes 38 seconds, a radius of 433.85 feet, and a tangent length of 92.92 feet; THENCE Southeasterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 183.07 feet to an iron' rod at the end of said curve; THENCE South 62 degrees 53 minutes 36 seconds East, a distance of 25.42 feet to an iron rod for an angle point; THENCE South 62 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East, a distance of 129.74 feet to an iron rod at the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a central angle of 50 degrees 24 minutes 07 seconds, a radius of 1162.27 feet, and a tangent length of 546.95 fe~t; THENCE easterly along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 1022.43 feet to an iron rod at the point of beginning and containing 9.9332 acres of land. This property is located on the south side of Meadow Lakes Drive, west of Rufe Snow Drive. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZON 1986. SEPTEMBER, CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING CO~lISSION ION I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I Page 8 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ACTING IN REGULAR SESSION THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IN CASE NO. PZ-86-45 IS HEREBY REZONED OC THIS 13th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1986. MAYOR CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS ATTEST: JEANETTE REWIS, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTORNEY I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Planning and Development Request of First American Savings Bane for "Message S1gn" - Council Meeting Date: 10/13/86 SO 86- 12 Agenda Number: Waldrum Sign Company has submitted a request for First American Savings Banc, located at the northwest corner of Oakridge Terrace and Bedford Euless, to place a ground sign on the site which would include an electronic message area. The proposed sign would be a total of 166 square feet in area. The "Message Sign" area would be 54 square feet of that total. The total sign area would be well within the area allowed for either frontage of the lot. The applicants propose to install the sign on the Bedford-Euless Road frontage with sufficient set back to allow for a 40 foot height. The application is submitted to the City Council for approval of the "Message Sign" area under Section 5.8 of the Sign Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: It is Staff's opinion that the proposed sign for the First American Savings Banc is in compliance with all other criteria of the Ordinance and the City Council can approve the proposed "message area" under Section 5.8 of the Sign Ordinance. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Opera . g Budget Ot r Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available £~~ , ity Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . FInance Director Page 1 of 1 I I e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I ~21~r;~rn ) HOME OFFICE: P.O. BOX 151082 . IRVING. TEXAS 75015 (214) 438-1628 . METRO 445-0055 BRANCH OFFICE: 6502 BANDERA ROAD . SUITE 100 SAN ANTONIO. TEXAS 78238 . (512) 523-0332 September 23,1986 City Secretary City of North Richland Hill 7301 NE Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 To Whom It May Concern: We would like to ask to be placed upon the agenda of your next City Council meeting. We will be requesting the ap- proval of a sign for the First American Savings Bane. I have included a drawing of the sign along with the site plan showing the approximate location. We are placing the sign 15' behind the property line which allows an height of 40', but since we are asking for an electronic message center we must corne to the City Council for your approval. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, dötJ Terry Waldrum I I ~ e I Iq '- 2." . ~ 1_ ~l ~ I 24" I~ ~~I I ~ l 2!.J ~ 7.'..1 .1.. , . lZ....ø 4' " -ð .I~ 2.'-J .~ . I , It I z...o . I IFñrr~lc &Iillù®rrll~~ITil ~WllITù$~ J g~ITù(Ç .. I '. t) I -0-: ~ I ~ I _.~ I lit i· ¿i'~ ~ .¡ ~ ,9 ~ ~ I·· ... ~ " M ;1 1 1 1 I i' ~~ I -* 'v'A~M \.\Jtu... ~i'P,-...¡ ~ V&Cé ï/) ~M ~ Me~- _ M.f!E ~~ fL? ~ ~E:.z<. 'viIA-. f/IZð\l\ QJ:::. ~ ~11..LJ\I. At:._·~~.1I~ uP IN-?IDE ~=~ ïb lfoJc;..D~ ~ .......~r""-~=r _?e='¿"¡ Ic..e. ~~~15~'~ · -314 R.-I ttÆ~ 8-18-Biø -:n- c::r .. 2Jø - &., ~ ~ - /'" ~.¿-~4- .-o,,~~_ 6~ ~BS ~L...þ.¿¿_ ""'\':;--A..- __ -- ~~ ~. _l_NTE .c....lA_ -Y L..d.;.j "" I "J x-ED &=-11 SE.::;,-r- .~ ~ë. I ~ ;¡:.;;>. ~-~R; N"'~ -0 -S ~- ..:>t:..JP ~!? i ¡;;~~ ~NT-t. 1~ ':2~J!¡¡fZç'~ ..ld1~ ~% ¿~" Ee;.J ,;>ou:; Gt:>vE.12... - ~ MTL- ~ r~ ' 25 .:::.c~ . ~ME¿Ic.AN -;;"Ã"I~S 3A.N~ '-X--~: ./ ¿ - ¡---o ~aldru'!D . q,GN C:CM~ . . .. () 8 ~ ICKI \.L) '-J ~ ~ fJ.L w t- ~or ill ~ ~ ~ I ~ I t4' I I i I -------j I I (~~ ,.t II I 'I II I? - f »:r,; I I I ,,¡ I 'l~~ I --" I I 'f; I I I t/ 4/3. J I L.Df I~ R~HL-A~D t>~~ FI ~ f"1 ~IUi9 i I I ------------ 2S' I?LD~ L,I~~ I ' ï,_~ \S 'P' ¿,1"fY Of ~ð. ~I{,HLA MD HII.,,(..,~I_ f -ry OP H iJ IZ~ .. 4æ>.1 .BtPfDR-D - fuL£~s Rd. I, _,.'-;, ...:) . ..... - . ,.r~-'- I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: - Council Meeting Date: Request of D & G Advertising for Billboard Sign SO 86- 13 Agenda Number: 10/13/86 D & G Adyertising Company has submitted a request for approval for the erection of an off-site Billboard Sign to be located on the north side of the Loop 820/Highway 183 Interchange on the lot belonging to the Cafe Laredo. The Cafe address is 8204 Bedford-Euless Road. The sign is proposed to be constructed on the southeast corner of the property adjacent to the Freeway Service Road. The applicant has submitted drawings indicating the location of the sign on the site. There will be an intrusion of the sign support into one parking space. However, the overhang of the sign will be over a total of five spaces. The Ordinance does not specify that this arrangement is in violation. All of the spaces could still be used with the exception of the space where the pylon is situated. The Cafe Laredo is required to provide a minimum of 75 spaces. The site currently has a total of 78 spaces. To eliminate parking under the proposed sign would take the restaurant parking below the minimum required number. In observing the site the Staff noted that Cafe Laredo does not currently have a pole sign on the freeway side of their site. However, many of the other restaurants and motels do have on-site ground signs along this service road. These signs, being controlled by different criteria, are not as large nor are they as high as the billboard can be. Therefore the billboard could have a detrimental effect upon the existing signs on the adjacent properties. The owners of the other businesses may feel that they are placed at a disadvantage by a billboard at this location. Certainly from several angles the billboard will provide a visual barrier for the existing signs at the various businesses. The proposed billboard location is 2200 feet from the nearest billboard to the west and 2700 feet from the nearest billboard to the east. Therefore if this sign location is approved no other requests may be submitted in this area. RECOMMENDATION: The Staff is of the op1n10n that the requested billboard located on the Cafe Laredo site may be approved under a strict interpretation of the Ordinance. However, the City Council should be aware that two specific problems will be created by the approval of this sign. 1) Cafe Laredo will remain in compliance with the parking requirements if the parking spaces under the sign are included. No information is available as to whether a liability problem is created by this arrangement. 2) There are a great many pole signs already in the area along the Freeway Service Road. Many of these were approved by a variance to the Sign Ordinance for size, location and height. The billboard location, by blocking the sight of those signs, could cause a new round of requests for variance to the Ordinance. Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available / t Head Signature ~I¡;¡/~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I II Area of Wall ~I''' Sign location on lot $o"..-rL~.. + ~.'-~ ~", I ~~~ lI"I-I...e-t..eJ trie. pl." _I__~___- - J~lans_aJ-,dJ~þotQ o(aJl signs on property (SUbmitte~) NO .J:.. YES _ Lighted II Yes/NO Name of Contractor __ b ftj ..¿;. #/"-1 ri,', haIJ Name of person or finn erecting the Sign 8Þ¿ S':.1t"¡/';' ~I/ ~e~1 I Width of Lot facing Qualifing Street ($f. ~ //8. ~4-' (Written consent of the owner of the Building structure or land to which or on Ie which the structure is to be erected or sign to be painted.) 'Ñ ~~eI /ØfWI'/ tv . / ~¿ II! II Taking up parking spaces NO _ YES ~ BTocking any Firelanes NO 1lYES Engineers seal and stress sheets. Location Flagged NO )( YES _ OTHE~~ . I Estimated Sign Value $ /..&; ~()Þ. 1:14 . Pennanent or Billboard f11ing fee $50.00. .. " I I I I I Ie I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST Type of Sign CtÞ"'IttL"~'·./ ,,.//6,ø,t! Date 1'1/.11" OF , Zoning ~e~",,~~~" / Name of Applicant "'I'd- ;(dÍ/~"'''t;''' a Address e :'04- B"J.(J,,J £a.4(...sS kI... Phone ?'11! ¿S"'~ 1 Location of the Sign s.,"~~ûlr--I- ~ i#""'r Lot ± Block -LJddC#c"J. ",." Adell ******************************************************************************* The undersigned agree to confonm to all applicable sign ordinance 11001.1-24-83. and other ordinances of the City of North Richland Hills. and assume all respon- s1bilites for erecting ~th;S 19n. '- 7 · Signature of Applicant _~ f'7'A-4.~1 Approved By Date Signed /o/~/i14 Approved Date PLEASE ATTACH ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO THE BACK OF THIS FORM. 1:"<> - / . L'~ _. I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I - I I term of ~h1s lease. The lessor hereby waives and disclaims any landlord's lien or o~her claim against the property placed Upon the leased premises by lessee which may arise as a result of the execution of this agreement, by law, or otherwise. Any sign or i~rovemen~ placed upon the lessor's premises by lessee shall be and continue to remain the personal property of lessee and shall not become the property OÎ lessor upon termination of this lease agreement. In the event that (a) lessee is unable to secure a required permit or license for erection of said sign structure from the appropriate governmental authority or (b> Federal, State, or local statute. ordinance, regulation, or other governmental action shall preclude or materially limit the use of the said si~e for advertising purposes, lessee shall have the right to terminate the lease Upon sixty days written notice to lessor and lessor shall refund to lessee any prepaid rent pro-rata for the unexpired portion of the lease. This lease agreement is binding Upon ~he heirs, adminis~ra~ors, execU~ors, successors, and assigns of ~he parties hereto. _ I .f!J . ~~ fl'~wr' ) SPE'-:IAL CONDr'r IONS; n 1 W}t I " ii' A Jr1 ." · .~ L · ;t-r . ¡; ~ ¡ J' I, f1,,- " fÞ'r · EXECUTED on the date first above wri~ten. þ~ ~~ Owner/Lessor a:~~ rJe-: ~ ~-~-{2/~-J-t ,,> OL-/h p ,-- Title _Lessee Tit leo T<.- -. ..;.~~~~~ .",' .... - -::r":'::: .....:...+-o .:- -- "~'": ::£:..~;_:. -;..-~ .......-~_-t~.. --.;;.....-:..;.;'t....~.:_. ~ -_. - : """"'-' ~.-. ;,;¡¿ ~;¡¡¡rl;i.¡" " CONTINUED ON MAP 38 '!~~~,:\ i~ I ~ ~ ;~.r ~{~~m ! ~ ':; \ b ; /I b þt11t'"d ~ +r t.A < T U r Q, 1IJ ~ ~ r t:J~ I r. r" SO < "I .. J, "- i- .~ ;$ IO~A+~d ~ ð-f¥'tC.tL e..a~4L ~n_&."~ f.~Ic..¡i-Ø¡ s.,.,."." Co '-4 ~ "L oJ ¡"'f-. :Ir ;S" 4rr/-:_ç.~.. y .:{¡.;z~~ ~~~t- ø+ f"'cf-~êd /oe....-¡..,_"- as" '''~·c.~~d ¡'eL.{ÞJAJ~ ;',~' ~ W ..~ì Z ::¡ ;.~.; .... 7" V ,. NNON liB ~ z o o w :J Z ¡:: Z o u ~y\ FL"tl<-=: ~ ~ ~I ~OFORD ~f ~ þ..- ChSTVIEW j Õ' .u. ~! ;~L 10 CRI & P RR ~-. CONTINUED ON .~P 66 BOOK PAGE 1052 ~. -- -~ f t ¡ i I -~ --J 1 -~ J 1 ~ _.& .J J it. ~ ] ;:-- j¡j :. ~-Pr,. i& I '. I I I I I I I It I I I I I I I I" I ., " f'J ..£ , ....... -a 9' ...... :5' CD {) --¡¡ .J '- ~ --1. t"..., o p ~i 'j r r ....... .... \S) ~ " 1 " ", ~ ,.- - I~ -, ". I.~, o ~ . I .' 3.·t!\: -~~,o )/'~' =L: . I f-.-l!trttJ ~ 1 7~~:~ 0 if · -_.:L~-J '--~-__ I ..~ I., I - -- -~'-lì-I' -1' . , . . ' " I -~ ~ -J' i / lJ e-=-::-::::!~.:_ J I I II' , '/ ~\.; 0 · L·· - f.l ~. J ., f - - -I /_- · ~ . ,/ ~~ r. ~ ¡ . ;1 f , , , -- - , 1-'- . . . :" . . "f \~.!.~'.-; ~: :~, . " t ~ .... . . . . i - ...; Il1o. ~ ~,. ., . . . ~'..'" ~ . . -, " ~ . -. ~ . .' .. .s . . #! '.,....~. , ,.... ' , ':. ~' '.:..'~ :"'''.:. ~ ' -'."', .. ;:~ . 1 . "-- \ ~otD< f11tr? ---- ~ I r'~ "..... íl /<J II! / I I. 1// J : Jtl . . - - __. , : ¡ 11/'--' -" -;1(:,. -- --\ ~ . I; I! . Ii ;;>'< c' -'1:/ ~==;- -. -¡:; 111I '/ ---'- ~~;~, - ~ -'. ~ -. ~J ~~ " - fiJi! -'--1 _ 'U0i<.',......,.... .;;! I, .-.;.. _I' ..--- ---- - r ?";' n) . ; J__ _. __ / ~ ~ ~"i " · i I ¡ II i i'~ ": , \~ · 7C f, I, , i If ~ I ?; !Ll' I , l~.r . ~ -ø ; "I:. (I) ~ ,') ~ ~I~ 1 N .. '" Ç) I\) ~Z o [";:-t ~",> "r x '111 o '-/ '" '. .' ..... ,f . . .... ....~ - ~ hi " :Þ r'\ " . 0> (,' C -4 r rr- ~ ')(: Lu ~ z. ;~ ~ ~. ... - ---. ;---r-' I: '. '. ::. '\'i. ' , to ~.:~ "£'. ..' ~. I~. ... ... .: . :~. ." . , '. r.... ~.. .. .~ <f&. . ... . . . . . '~ '.~·:,~:¡tf· ;~),:':'" :.~;,:.: .' ~. , ". . . .~-'~':\. .~::.~)..~: ·1 , ..,:, ...:. '. ............ " ;(;':;f'\; .. -.-. . " IL "-"~ ~ ·,·1" <!' I () ',' ~ ,- t ..( , 1: - ~- 8 . 0 ! ~ þ n PI '-' w~ ; I · i- - - ~.r... I'" . ¡ ." -.:. ~ -J "--'--. _. --~ U" ~ ~ ~ '" ~ , ,- '~ ~ , , -t . , '\ V\ ~ -,.: Z " I" r \-", \' ':t: 'þ ~ -'" r r- Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget °è~. . ~ -ß ~ .- / ,.::-- ----- ç;L '1:1 ~ --- '''''---. . Department Head Sigñature I Ci y Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I I , I , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Parks and Recreation Department _ Council Meeting Date: 10-13-86 Support for Certification of all Coaches in Youth Sports Program - Resol ut ion No. 86-39 Agenda Number:GN 86-1(11 The National Youth Sports Coaches Association (NYSCA) is a non-profit organization of volunteer coaches dedicated to the improvement of youth sports programs through education, public awareness, league assistance and sports promotions. The NYSCA volunteer coach training program is endorsed nationally by the National Recreation and Parks Association and locally by the Texas Amateur Athletic Federation. The goals and objectives of the NYSCA are as follows: To train and certify the volunteer coach so that he/she has a better understanding of organization, teaching proper techniques, injury prevention and treatment, as well as the psychology of coaching youth sports. To provide leadership and education to foster youth sports programs in a wholesome atmosphere under conditions that will assure maximum athletic performance through youth participation and competent coaching. To foster high standards of ethics among athletes, coaches, administrators, and the general public. To conduct research and disseminate information on the operation of youth sports programming. The NYSCA National Certification Program lasts approximately six hours held on two evenings or one Saturday, the first year. The second and third year programs are more advanced and are only two and one-half hours in length. The cost of certification is a $15.00 annual fee for the coaches. In addition to the training, the coaches receive $300,000 in liability coverage, a certified coach patch membership card, certificate of completion, bi-monthly newsletter, first-aid card, and travel discounts on various hotels and car rentals. Coaches can be certified in more than one sport by attending, at no additional charge, the second half (sport specific portions) after completing the regular certification in another sport. Being an NYSCA certified coach does not indicate that volunteer coaches are qualified in the sense of a paid coach on the high school, college, or professional level. By virtue of attending the approximately six hours of instructions conducted by a trained clinician, NYSCA headquarters certifies that they are aware of their responsibilities to children in sports. Finance Review ----Nt.A- Acct. Number N/A Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director PaQe 1 of ? I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Those responsibilities are specifically: 1. Responsibility for being aware of the psychological and emotional needs of children while participating in sports. 2. Responsibility for knowing that safety and first-aid are the most important factors in the physical well being of children and that at all times a person of authority (physician, paramedic, etc.) should be called on to treat any kind of injury. 3. Responsibility for being aware that conditioning, nutrition, flexibility, and strength development are important factors for growing children that are involved in sports. 4. Responsibility for organizing fun and interesting practices in children sports. 5. Responsibility for teaching, to the best of their ability, proper techniques in sports. Finally, by signing the Code of Ethics Pledge, coaches are constantly reminded throughout their volunteer coaching career, that in youth sports the consideration for children should be placed far above their own personal desires for accomplishments. The training program is conducted by the local NYSCA Chapter Certified Clinician with the use of video tapes prepared by professionals in the respective subject areas. The North Richland Hills Parks and Recreation Department is the first department in our area to be granted NYSCA chapter status and the recreation department staff have been certified as NYSCA clinicians. Upon meeting NYSCA criteria for a Chapter, the Department will be provided all materials at no cost to the city. The groups affected by this resolution would incude any youth sports group or association using city facilities. Currently, this includes the Richland Youth Association and the North Richland Girls Softball Association. The leadership of both groups have been contacted and have been informed about the program. Other groups affected will include volunteer coaches for Recreation Department sponsored youth basketball and Junior Olympic volleyball programs to be offered at the new Community Center. The advantages of instituting this program by resolution would include: 1) a greater participation by youth sports coaches; 2) better training for volunteer youth sports coaches; 3) liability coverage for youth sports coaches; 4) reduction in liability risks for the City of North Richland Hills by providing instruction training to providers of high risk activities in city facilities; 5) compliance by youth sports coaches with a (NYSCA) Code of Ethics; 6) and most importantly, safer - higher quality youth sports programs for the children who participate in these programs. RECOt1MENDA T I ON : It is the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation staff and the Parks and Recreation Board (in unanimous votes at the September 2 and October 1, 1986 Parks and Recreation Board meetings), that the City Council approve the attached resolution requiring NYSCA certification effective January 1, 1987. CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I- I STATE OF TEXAS RESOLUTION REQUIRING COUNTY OF TARRANT CERTIFICATION OF ALL COACHES CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS IN YOUTH SPORTS PROGRAMS RESOLUTION NO. 86-39 WHEREAS, the Mayor and of City Council of the City of North Richland Hills recognize the need for quality youth sports programs; and WHEREAS The National Youth Sports Coaches Association has developed a certification program for youth sports coaches whereby the coaches are schooled in psychology of coaching youth sports, maximizing performance, injury prevention, and first aid; and WHEREAS, The National Youth Sports Coaches Association program should be applied to our present athletic programs to help improve coach/parent relationships, to educate our volunteer coaches so they have a better understanding of organization, teaching proper techniques, safety, and to bring them up to a more knowledgeable level in the psychological and physical needs of deal ing with young athletes, and to ensure all children obtain a wholesome experience in youth sports; and WHEREAS, through this certification program, the quality of youth sports in the City of North Richland Hills will be improved to the benefit of all persons involved. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council in meeting duly assembled and by the authority thereof that all coaches of youth sports programs operating within the structure of the North Richland Hills Parks and Recreation Department and/or using City facilities shall be required to be certified through the National Youth Sports Coaches Association Certification Program commencing January 1, 1987. PASSED AND APROVED THIS day of , 1986 Dan Echols - Mayor ATTEST: Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITIES Rex McEntire, City Attorney I' Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I ~.,.--- THIS IS ATTACHED PER THE MAYOR'S REQUEST. Certitying yoiithð coaches··an idea to·¡J;/considered IC I coached a youth league sport - and with all my nephews and nieces, I probably will be soon - I would do my best to be the most fair, most safety-conscious and most knowledgeable coach I could be. WeH, that's the goal of the Na- tional Youth Sports Coaches Associ- ation (NYSCA) and its six-hour C certification program. North Rich- ommentary land Hills should become the first "In NYSCA we devote sbout all local city to adopt the program at ita of our efforts to doing just that. And, regular city council meeting next we are the only organization of its Monday. kind in the country that provides If it passes, the certification pro- this comprehensive service to and cess - which includes two, three- for kids sports. " hour video tapes - would start Jan. Engl adds: "No parent would let a 1 for all youth sports ... soccer, foot- lO-year-old take swimming lessons baH, baseball, softball, basketball... from a person who is not qualified to j.. played on city facilities. . ; . teach. Well, what about the young . Jim Browne, assistant parks and people who suffer emotionally, recreation director, recently became pschologicaJly and sometimes physi- . certified and would administer the cal abuse because the youth coach clinics. was never told he had responsibil- Of course, there are and will be ities in these areu.'. detractors. Some know-it-all youth Between 15. and 20-million league coaches will balk, even young persons Participate in orga- though the program is directed spe- nized sports in the United States. cifically at them. Those who think Everyone complains about "that they cannot learn anything new and coach who yells all the time," but beneficial need the program the until now few have done anything most. "about it. . Plus the program is not going to "Most parents are wonderful peo. turn bad coaches into good ones. But pIe," Engh was quoted in The Grsnd all will be reminded that youth Rapids Press. "But some of those sports are for the enjoyment and en- wonderful people can quickly turn richment of the young players and into ugly monsters when they get not for adults to relive their child- caught up in winning games, cham- hood. It also will make sure the pionships and trophies. coaches have the ability to render "Most kids don't want this. They basic first-aid to an injured child. just want to go out and have fun At last Wednesday's special with their friends. Unfortunately, _, meeting of the NRH Parks and Re- parents have a habit of living their" ' creation Board, residents posed a re- lives through their children's experi., ' alistic problem with the program. ences, especially in athletics. It's not What would happen to those coach. just Billy who strikes out, but Billy's es who could not attend certification dad. And that's where we lose sight. meetings because of job or other of what sports should be." .1 conflicts? The NYSCA's literature The six-hour video tape, narrated said that sports with less than 50 by Naional Spokesman for the percent of its coaches certified could NYSCA Curt Gowdy, deals with the be .cancelled. psychology of coaching children, The city Said no league would be safety, first aid, the prevention of in- "cancelled and it would try to sched. juries and the organization of ule enough sessions that every coach, practices. even those scrounged up at the last Besides its practical value, such a minute due to an overflow of play- program could have legal value in ers, would have an opportunity to near future. Sports lawsuits are be- take the course before or during the· coming more and more common. ' season. ' One such lawsuit led directly to Anything different' will have New .Jersey passing a law to grant problems in its infancy. but this pro· immunity all youth league coaches. gram should be given a hard look by who participate in a safety training every city and youth league in the program. In 1983, a New Jersey Lit- state. . tie League coach was sued for using Even the coaches' volunteer sta- an infielder as an outfielder in an tus as a "parent just trying to help all-star game. out" should not exempt them from The parents contended their the responsibilities stressed in the son's eye injury resulted because he progam, said Fred Engh, NYSCA was not trained to be an outfielder founder and president. and he subsequently lost a fly ball in "In most cases, the parent proba- the sun. The suit was settled out of bly has never been told that his or court for $25,000. her responsibility extends beyond But New Jersey's "little, league ensuring that the team wins the bill" - approved in May _ will co v- championship:' Engh said. "Per- er coaches in all instances except haps more importantly, that respon- gross negligence or leaving a team sibility includes the development of unattended. the value system of the young people The NYSCA and the North Rich- being coached, and it is just as im- land Hills recreation department portant for parents and coaches to hope that safety cerification pro- remember that youth sports should grams will help prevent such cases be a fun experience." from becoming commonplace. The NYSCA's brochure summa- They also want to be sure young rizes it's goal: players do not receive any psycho- "We've seen the overly-aggressive logical injuries from overzealous, un- coach who puts his own desire to win trained, volunteer coaches. shead of the best interest of the "\Ve don't care whether the kids, or who doesn't know how to coaches come out knowing what an motivate kids, or how to prevent and infield fly rule is," Engh says. "We treat injuries. Yet less than 10 per- want them to be aware of the psy. cent of all youth sports leagues make chological impact they have on an effort to train their coaches. kids. " --=: ~ ~ --..:::- . \ I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Planning and Development Department: Subject: - Council Meeting Date: Proposed Amendment to Section 10 of the Zoning OrdinancÄe d N b GN 86-108 to ermlt ncentlve ncreases ln par men gen a urn er: Planned Development Controls Ordinance No. 1409 10/13/86 I I I I I I I This proposed revision to Section 10 of the Zoning Ordinance is in the area of the Multi-Family Planned Development District. The proposed revision would modify the maximum unit density allowed on a Planned Development Multi-Family Site. The intent of the Ordinance Revision would be to allow an incentive increase in the maximum density of units when the PD Site Plan is submitted and approved by the Commission and the City Council. The proposed revision would allow Planned Development Sites to increase density to a maximum of 20 units per acre. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the proposed revision to Section 10 of the Zoning Ordinance. I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) .. ~ BUdge~ _ 1- . ~i I ,- - CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available ¡Zllil/-~ City Manager . Frnance Director Paae 1 of · . I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I i' I ..' ; Page 11 P & Z Minutes September 11, 1986 ( ( Mr. Clark said Mr. Frank poor job maintaining it. Mr. Frank stated he maintains but it will be the homeowners association. Chairman Bowen told should call the c· y complaints. Clark that he he has any en closed the Public PZ 86-43 APPROVED Ms. ash made the motion to approve 86-43 with the understanding that the lot size and square footage of the house be put on the plat. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. PZ 86-44 APPROVED Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-44 with the stipulation to continue the requirements related to the golf course as contained in the previous cases. This motion was seconded by Ms. Flippo and the motion carried 5-0. Mr. Wood made the motion to approve PZ 86-45. This motion was seconded by Mr. Schwinger and the motion carried 5-0. 9. PZ 86-46 Consideration of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1080 regarding the R-7-MF District. Chairman Bowen stated this amendment would change the Planned Development to allow a maximum of 20 units. PZ 86-46 APPROVED Ms. Flippo made the motion to approve PZ 86-46. This motion was seconded by Ms. Nash and the motion carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:30 P. M. Chairman Planning & Zoning Commission Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I . - ].... ORDINANCE NO. 1409 BE IT ORDAINED by the City of North Richland Hills, Texas, that Ordinance No. 1080 (Zoning Ordinance), adopted January 9, 1984 and as heretofore amended, be and the same is hereby amended at the following section: R-7 MF DISTRICT Revise the following sections: Section 10.4.13 Maximum density may not exceed twenty (20) units per acre, except as may be granted when combined with an approved PD Site Plan. Section 10.6 Cd) Maximum density may not exceed twenty (20) units per acre gross density under any circumstances. APPROVED BY THE PT~ING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. CHairman Planning & Zoning Commission ~ } "~~ Secret~y Planniág & Zan~u~ission PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1986. ATTEST: Mayor Jeanette Rewis, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney ~. ' --Department: Bank Wire Transfer Contracts bject: kesolut1.on 86-44/86-45 Finance CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS -- Council Meeting Date: 10/13/86 I I I I I I I , GN 86-109 Agenda Number: The City .of North Richland Hills is required from time to time to make wire transfers for investment, insurance, and bond payment purposes. Our present bank depository contract is not specific in this area to authorize certain personnel to make the necessary transfer. The City's depository banks (Interfirst Richland and Texas Commerce Bank - Hurst) request the attached contracts be formally approved by Council action. I I Recommendation: It is recommended that the wire transfer côntracts be approved for Interfirst Richland I and Texas Commerce Bank - Hurst authorizing Lee Maness, Debbie Scott, and Jim Cook to make necessary transfers required as limited to amounts specified in the attached contracts. It is also recommended that Resolutions 86-44 and 86-45 be approved. I I - ~ t I N/A N/A N/A /7l "--. Finance Review Acct. Number N/A Sufficient Funds Available ource of Funds: IindS (GO/Rev.) erating Budge .r Page 1 of 1 Co ---- ;eq¡r ~~ City Manager , Finance Director Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM - I· -- 1 1 I I 1 I I , 1 1 I I I I '- I I . RESOLUTION NO. 86-44 WHEREAS, from time to time, the City of North Richland Hills verbally requests Interfirst Bank Richland, N.A. (the "Bank") to transfer funds to other banks or to other accounts at the Bank for credit to persons designed by the City of North Richland Hills in amounts not to exceed the collected balance on deposit ~ith the Bank. in a matter ~hich makes it inconvenient or impossible to execute prior written authorization, instructions or releases otherwise required by the Bank so that the Bank must have standing instructions upon ~hich to act pursuant to verbal requests for the transfer of funds. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the officers of the City of North Richland Hills, listed belo~ are hereby authorized to enter into and perform the Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" on behalf of the City of North Richland Hills ~ith the Bank providing for requests for the transmission of funds belong to the City of North Richland Hills upon the terms and conditions set forth in said Agreement, and to delete and-appoint such persons, from time to time, ~ho may request such transfers on behalf of the City of North Richland Hills in accordance ~ith such Agreement. The authority conferred herein may be exercised singly by any of such officers and shall continue in full force and effect until written notice of revocation shall be received by the Bank. TITLE (Authorized Signature) TITLE (Authorized Signature) TITLE (Authorized Signature) Passed and approved this 13th day of October, 1986. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I '- I I I I I I I " I I I I I I '- I I RESOLUTION NO. 86-45 WHEREAS, from time to time, the City of North Richland Hills verbally requests Texas Commerce Bank-Hurst, N.A. (the "Bank") to transfer funds to other banks or to other accounts at the Bank for credit to persons designed by the City of North Richland Hills in amounts not to exceed the collected balance on deposit with the Bank, in a matter which makes it inconvenient or impossible to execute prior written authorization, instructions or releases otherwise required by the Bank so that the Bank must have standing instructions upon which to act pursuant to verbal requests for the transfer of funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the officers of the City of North Richland Hills, listed below are hereby authorized to enter into and perform the Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" on behalf of the City of North Richland Hills with the Bank providing for requests for the transmission of funds belong to the City of North Richland Hills upon the terms and conditions set forth in said Agreement, and to delete and-appoint such persons, from time to time, who may request such transfers on behalf of the City of North Richland Hills in accordance with such Agreement. The authority conferred herein may be exercised singly by any of such officers and shall continue in full force and effect until written notice of revocation shall be received by the Bank. TITLE (Authorized Signature) TITLE (Authorized Signature) TITLE (Authorized Signature) Passed and approved this 13th day of October, 1986. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I· -- I I I 1 I I I , I I I I I I P- I I .'nterFlrst InterFirst Bank Richland, N.A. 6100 Rufe Snow Drive Post Office Box 18889 Fort Worth, Texas 76118-0889 (817) 485-2650 Debbie Dodson Controller July 11, 1986 Mr. Lee Maness City of North Richland Hills P.O. Box 18609 N. Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Dear Lee: I have enclosed three forms which we need to have on file to properly send wires on the City's behalf. Please complete them at you earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, ~ ~~~J Debbie Dodson Enclosures DD/ds ,.. Ia~ I I: InterFfrií lAnk 0.1111, ".A. f Pag! 1 of Z EaJlib'lt A to FUIIds Trusfer Te,. And Condftions (Authorized Representatiyes) ICed below .... tilt n...s of tile Authorized RepreSentatives. their transfer Ifmits. 'if any. and the aunt n-.rs f". ....fch each fs .uthorized to transfer funds 1n accOrdance wfth the Funds Transfer Tt,.. And Condftions of InterFfrst Bank Datlas. ".A., accepted by Customer. I Date October 7, 1986 Name and Phone Number --- ---- ~ Maness Maximum Amount ACcount Numbers S 1,000,000 400 880 1 400 881 9 400 882 7 400 863 7 051 706 0 401 084 9 r-Q041 Ext. 130 I lCOOk S 500,000 400 880 1 .-0041 Ext. 116 400 881 9 400 882 7 400 863 7 "-- I I 051 706 0 401 084 9 IL..::~ )U Irt further requested to fssue Personat Identfffcatfon Numbers (PINS) for each of the Authorized 'lsentauyes }fsted above Ind to IIIIft those PINS dfreCtly to the respective Authorized RepresentatiYe : t address specffied on Exhfbft B hereto. I I l- I I ACCEPTED: Customer: ...... , ~ " 8y: TftJe: ------ --:--: I, I I··~ .... " . ... I·· I I· I , I I I I I I It I I . ~ Pag! 2 of 2 Üh1b1t A to Funds Transfer Te,. And Conditions (AuthoriZed RepreSentatives) TO: InterFf..st SInk o.l1u. ".A. Date October 7. 1986 LIsted below.... the n...s of the Authorized Representatives. their transfer limits, 1f any. and the accOWlt nUlllbtrs frœ which each is .uthorized to transfer funds in accordance with the Funds Transfer r.r.s And Conditions of InterFirst SInk 0.11as. H.A.. accepted by Customer. Name and Phone NUmber ---- -- ---- Maximum Amount ACcount Numbers S 500.000 400 RRO 1 - 400 RRl Q 400 882 7 400 863 7 051 706 0 401 084 9' Deborah Scott 281-0041 Ext. 201 s You .re further requested to fssue Personal Identfffcation Numbers (PINS) for each of the Authorized RepreSentatives Ifsted above and to mail those PINS directly to the respective Authorized Representative It the address specified on Exhibit B hereto. ACCEPTED: .. .. Cusfòmer: 8y: , :, " T1tJe: 1'\1' i>/ I I I I I I , I I I I I I l- I I ;,a Pa ge ---L..- 0 f --1-.. Ex'r' bi t 8 to Funds Transfer Te... And Conditions (Accounts) To: Int.rFfrst Bank 0.11a5. M.A. Date October 1, 1986 Ltsted below are the accounts from whfch funds may be transferred by the uncersfgned "Customer" or an Authorized Represenutive in accordance with the Funds Transfer Terms And C(.f dftfons of InterFirst Bank 0.11 as. N.A. accepted by Customer. Adv1 ces of funds transferred. and a 11 n(.1:i ces are to bema11 ed to Address provided below. (1) 400 880 1 Account Number City of North Richland Hills Consolidated Account Account Name Attention P. O. Box 18609 Street or P.O. Box North Richland Hills City Texas State 76180 Zip [] Yes [)(] No Call-back verification required for non-repetitive transfers. $ 1.000.·000 [x] Yes [] No Maximum debit transfer amount. Notification required for incoming credits. (2) 400 881 9 Account Number City of North Richland Hills Payroll Fund Account Name Attention P. O. Box 18609 Street or P.O. Box North Richland Hills City Texas State 76180 Zip [] Ves [x] No Call-back veriffcat10n requfred for non-repetitive ':ransfers. 400 881 9 Max1mu. debit transfer amount. ex] Yes [] No Notification required før incoming cr~dits. -"~ . ," '. ACCEPTED: Customer: City of North Richland Hills By: T1 t 1 e: 1.\ 1 . ; I I I I I I I , I I I I I I '- I I . .. Exhibit 8 to Funds Transfer Te,. And Conditfons (Accounts) Pa ge ---L. 0 f --ª-- To: InterFfrst Bank Da11as. N.A. Date October 7 ~ 1986 Lfsted below are the accounts from which funds may be transferred by the Uncersigned "Customer" or In Authorized Representative in accordance with the Funds Transfer Terms And C("lditions of InterFfrst Bank o.l1as. N.A. accepted by Customer. Advices of funds tranSferred. and al1 n(otices are to be mailed to address provided below. (1) 400 882 7 Account Number P. o. 5.QX 18609 Street or P.O. Sox [] res m1 No $1.000.000 ~ Ves [] No (2) 400 863 7 Account Humber p~' o. Box 18609. Street or P.O. Box [] Yes Dc8 No $1.000.000 ~~ Yes [] No .--- ," '0 of North Richland Hills Insurance 1m rest Account Account Hame Attention North Richland Hills Cfty Texas State 76180 lip Ca'I-back veriffcation required for non-repetitive transfers. Maximum debit transfer amount. : Notification required for fncoming credits. Cit of North Richland Hills Revenue Sharing Account Account Name Attention North Richland Hills City Texas State 76180 Zip Ca11-back verification required for non-repetitive ':ransfers. Maximum debit transfer amount. : Notification required for incoming credits. -' ~, ACCEPTED: Customer: j ¡ ¡ ~ I , t r By: Cit~ of North Richland Hills Title: Director of Finance I,,· I I I I I I , . ;.a Exhibit 8 to Funds Transfer Teras And Conditfons (Accounts) Page 3 of 3 --- To: InterFfrst Bank Da 114s. N.A. Date Oc tober 7, 1986 Lfsted be10w are the accounts from whfch funds may be transferred by the uncersigned "Customer" or an Authorized Representatfve fn accordance with the Funds Transfer Terms And CC."ditions of InterFi rst link Da11as. N.A. accepted by Customer. Advices of funds transferred. and a11 nC'1:icls are to be mailed to Address provided below. I I I I I I l- I I (1) 051 706 0 Account Number P. O. Box 18609 Street or P.O. Box C ] Yes Ðcj No j500.000 ~ Ves [ ] No (2) 401 084 9 Account Number P. O. Box 18609 Street or P.O. Box [ ] Ves Ðcj No $1.000.000 ~ Ves [ ] No . ," I. Cit of North Richland Hills Ses uicentennial Account Account Name Attention North Richland Hills Cfty Texas State 76180 Zip Ca11-back verification required for non-repetitive transfers. Maximum debit transfer ~ount. Notiffcation required for incoming credits. Cit of North Richland Hills 1986 Series Revenue Bonds Account Name Attention North Reichland Hills City Texas State 76180 Zip Ca11-back veri ficatfon requi red for non-repeti tive ':ransfers. Maximum debit transfer amount. Notification required for fncoming credits. ~" ACCEPTED: Customer: 8y: T1 tIe: I· I I I I I I I " I I I I I I '- I· I . . Exhibit c to Funds Transfer TenB And Conditions (Repetitive Transfers) TO: InterFf rst Sink Da Ills. M.A. Date In accordance with the Funds Transfer Tems And Condi tions of InterFf rst Bank [a 11 as. N.A.. acCepted by Customer. you are authortzed to assi 9n Customer a Repetithe Transfer Number Ind to es tab 1 i sl1 the repetithe transfer indicated be10w wherein the debit and credf t parties remai, the same. but da te and money amount Ire variable. A: DESIT the f0110wing account at InterFfrst. Account Humber . Account HI" CALL-BACK VERIFICATION required for ...petitive transfers: (] Yes [] No 8. CREDIT the funds IS indfcated be1ow. [ ] Credft this account at InterFfrst. Account NUllÒer Account HIIIIe [ ] Trlnsf.~ the funds to the blnk named below: ·Na.. of BAni Branch ABA NumDer Cfty Sta ta C. THE MESSAGE to be printed on the advice of credit or to be inc1uded fn the wire to the bank specified above fs .s f0110ws: (Maximum of 3 1fnes of 80 characters per 1fne) You .... further requested to send the Repetithe Transfer Number and a copy of the fomatted message to Customer at the address indicated be1ow: . Attention .ø" Street or P. O. Sot"· '. ¡ i f ; I Cfty lip S ta te ACCEPTED: Customer: By: Tftle: I· Ie I I I I I I I , I I I I I I l- I 1--- ~ WIRE mANSFm AUTH<RIZATION &: AGREEMmT Texas Cœmerce Bank - Hurst N.A. P.O. Box 337 860 Airport Free~ Hurst, TX 76054 TO WHCM IT MAY CONCmN: Because THE CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS (the CUSTOMER) from t e tl.me requests ¡y means 0 tele on c, telegraphic, com- puter conmunication device, oral or written requests or orders, the transfer of funds in amounts not to exceed the balance on deposit fran the CUSTCKER' s account (s) maintained at the TEXAS CCMMmCE BANK- HURST N. A., Hurst, Texas ( "Bank") to other banks for credit to persons/ accounts designated by this CUSTCKER or fran one CUgræm account at Bank to another CUgrOMm account at Bank; and on occasion. THE Bank is unable to obtain their normal written instructions and authorization on the same d~; TmREFæE, in consideration of the Bank's acting upon such requests for the transfer of funds and forebearing its requirement of written instructions, ccmnencing X OCTOBER 14 , 19 86 , we hereby authorize you to: - 1. Honor, execute and charge to our account(s) at the Bank (or ac- cept checks drawn on CUSTCKER' s account at Bank), all telephonic, oral or written requests or orders for the transfer of funds when such requests or orders are received fram an authorized represen- tative of the CUSTOMER listed in Form A (an "Authorized Represen- tative") using appropriate coded identification, and are made in compliance with the Bank's transfer procedures. Transfer funds from specific CUgrCKER account(s) with the Bank to any other Specified CUSTOMm bank account(s) whether such ac- count ( s ) are wi th the Bank or other bank ( s ); and 2. 3. Transfer :fÚnds from CUSTOMJ!R account(s) with the Bank to any ac- count (s) of a third party, whether such third party account (s ) are with the Bank or other bank(s); 4. Electronically record telephone conversations between Bank and CUSTOMER's authorized representatives. The decision to record a call is solely within Bank's discretion and Bank shall have no liability for failing to do so. We agree to report any discrepancies between the CUSTCKER's records of these transactions and the Bank statement to the Bank's Wire Transfer Department in writing wi thin fourteen ( 14) dB8S after the statement date. Failure to notify the Bank of any discrepancies within the fourty-four (44) day period will reliev-e the Bank of any liability. 5. Act upon all transfer requests on- the date received, when re- ceived prior to the deadlines required by the Bank, and to use any means for the transmission of funds the Bank IDa3' consider sui t- able and charge the appropriate account for ~ direct charge to the Bank for the transfer (i.e., access charge from Federal Reserve for transfers under $1, <XX> ) . 6. Transfer funds based upon predete~ined criteria described in written instructions to the Bank signed qy an authorized repre- sentative of the CUSTCKER. I· ~ -. I Wire Transfer Authorization & Agreement Cont. Page 2 I It is understood that this funds transfer service (including oral transfer request) is provided as a convenience to the CUSTCNm and in consideration of obligations of the Bank hereunder, we Agree to (a) Release the Bank from res pons ib ili ty for liability, loss or damage or delB¥ resulting from: CUSTOMm 's failure to follow this Agreanent or other procedures for wire transfers of which Bank has notified CUSTOMm; any delay in the performance by Bank of, or failure to perform, the provisions of this Agree- ment which is caused by an act of God, fire or other catastrophe, electrical, or computer failure; acts of, delays or failure to act by, any carrier and/or agent operating between Bank and Customer, or by recipients of transferred funds and their per- sonnel; or, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, any other cause beyond the Bank's control. Customer will in- demnify and hold Bank harmless from any claims, demands, ex- penses (including reasonable attorney's fees), losses or damages arising out of the Bank's acting upon a transfer request, persons purporting to be authorized Customer representatives and which transfers are made by Bank in accordance with this Agreement or fran Bank's refusal to act upon requests not made in accordance wi th this Agreement or which cannot be authenticated by Bank if Bank elects to attanpt an authentication. (b) Subject to :paragrap¡. 4 above, agree that compensation if any, for the loss of interest or use of funds due the CampaQy as a result of a Bank error or of the Bank's failure to execute a transfer request on the date received, when received prior to the Bank's deadline, and when such error is within the Bank's control, will be for a period not exceeding fourteen (14) days (the CUSTOMm Notification of Discrepmcies period) or the date of actual transfer or error correction whichever comes first, and will be in the form of either of the following at the Bank's option: 1 ) Adjust the aggregate ledger and collected balances of the CUSTCNm's account to reflect proper¡Y in the aver~ balances on the account analysis the amounts that would have resul ted had no error occurred . I I I I I , I I I 2) Reimbursement by check not exceeding the average Fed Funds interest rate for the period and amount in question, less reserves, computed on a daily basis. (c) Assume full responsibility for all transfers made by the Bank: in gpod faith in accordance with these procedures and agree that the Bank: shall be conclusive¡Y deemed to have exercised ordinary care if it has followed these procedures or if the CUSTOMm has not followed them. (d) Agree that the transfer requests will at no time exceed the account's collected balance as determined by the Funds (Wire) Transfer Depirtment of the Bank. CUSTOMm shall be liable for any funds transferred upon proper instructions by CUSTCNm whether or not such amount exceeds collected balance at the Bank . I I I '- I (e) Agree to SIlpp¡Y the Bank, in addition to Form A, any other in- formation that the Bank may reasonably request, including but not limited to money amounts, accounts to be affected, date of transfers, supplemental instructions, a resolution authorizing Wire Transfer of Funds and further evidence of any authorized representative's authority to transfer funds or to do aQY other act contemplated under these procedures. Bank will assign CUSTCNm a Securi~ Code Number which authorized representative must use when requesting Bank to make funds transfers. I ----- I· ~ -. 1 Wire Transfer Authorization &: Agreement Cont. Page 3 I (f) Agree that all requests by CUSTOMm for transfers shall conform to the procedures as Bank ~ from time to time prescribe. Bank ~ change these procedures upon notice to CUSTOMm. CUSTOMm further agrees that it will prevent the disclosure wi thin and outside of its organization, except on a "need to know" basis, of any of Bank's procedures relating to transfers of funds. If the confidentiality of the procedures is compromised, CUSTQMm will notify Bank immediately. (g) Confirmation and advice of each transfer will be mailed daily by Bank to the following mailing address for the CUgrCMm: I I 1 } CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS P. O. BOX 18609 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS. TEXAS 76180 I This Agreement will be governed by the law of the State of Texas. All obligations hereunder are performable in Tarrant County, Texas. This Agreement will terminate upon Bank's written notice to CUSTOMm, or upon receipt by Bank's Wire Transfer Department of CUSTCMm's written notice of termination. The indemnification and limitation of liability pro- visions of this Agreement will survive any such termination. 1 , DATED: y... OCTORF.R 6. , 19-ª.L- I Y CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS {Company ) BY: TITLE: I 1 ACCEPrED: TEXAS C()1M]RCE BANK-HURST, N.A. BY: DATE: 1 I I l- I I ~--- I ~ ~ I REM A CUSTQMm'S AUTHORIZED REHUSmTATIYæ I NAME SIGNATURE TITLE mONE NUMBER j Lee Maness Director of Finance 281-0041 EXT 130 Jim Cook Asst. Dir. of Finance 281-0041 EXT 116 Deborah Scott Staff Accountant 281-0041 EXT 203 I I I I Bank ~, at Bank's sole discretion, and without liability for fail- ing to do so, call one of CUSTOMm I S authorized re11resentati ves (other than the representative who originated the request) to authenticate a request prior to initiating a transfer. If Bank is unable to authen- ticate such request, Bank ~, at Bank's option, refuse to make the requested transfer. Please insert address ( as) to which daily Advices of Wire Transfers should be sent for account(s) held at Texas Cœmerce Bank _ Hurst, N.A. I , ACCOUNT '# ACCOUNT TITLE ADDRæS TO WHICH ADVICm ARE TO BE SmT I x N/A City of North kichland P. O. Box 18609 Hil18 mnturing CD's and inter~8t North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 I I I Password Individual PIN'S Assigned (to be assigned by TCB-Hurst upon receipt of Form A) I Bank may re~ upon the authority of the authorized representatives listed in Form A until Bank's Wire Transfer Department has received written n0- tice from CUgrCMER specifying a change therein. I Submitted By: Accepted: (City of North Richland Hills l- I BY: TITLE DATE Texas Commerce Bank-Hurst, N. A. BY: TITLE DATE !...- I r=::. -. > ~ ~~ ~ii& ~~......o > I 0 O~O::S~ 0 ""0 c+ ØiËIc+gc+ CD E3 C+::S- !~ilÐ ~ ...... ......0 (':) Þ-1 c+ þ" @ ~ i;1 ~~ &$D§~CD ~ CD - ~ E;~ CD C+C+CDt:"I ~ ~rblÐ~~ ~ c+ I ~ H ...... ~ H)O ~~d-a X a::S i-: ~ ~ 2: OH) ~ ...,. ~ Þ-10 5·~d-~C+ (1)Þ-1 d-c+ !fZf)~ Þ-1 cT Þ-1 ~ ~ I [[ il8 Þ-1CD(1) ~[mi<+~ (1) S:S-~E; 0 (1) ~ (1) H ::SÞ-1 d- ~ to 0 Øi ~ 1-3 (1) CD CD c+ d- ""0 ~ CD H ~ ~ 5°ffi~£" ~ I ~c+ OQco~ g a~ ¡..... ::r' 00 r~ §œ; ...,. ig~ ~g8~ ~S-~c+ ...,.< to (1) ~r-r ~ c+Þ-1 ~') d- ii~~ ~Þ1~ ~c+ ::1 i (1)Þ-1 . ~ ~ gë¡l~g ! ~~ í!) ;j ;j I t1 P.. C"Q ~ g=co ~ ËI ...,. H) CD d- ro.......... - d- ~IÐ~¡ 0 Þ-1ti) t') OQ~ ~ ~~ rt (1) tJj Þ-1 Þ-1 .. CO þt~~~~ .. ~ b:JH irf d-~ ...... ~ ;j mS:8sf& i6~ ...... ::J r:- I ...... ~ ,., (1)d-~~C+ 0 I ~-: ~ ~~ ~ 0 ö~ Þ-1::s-a cT §.;;J 0 ¡:u ~ o ...,. CD CD ;d-CD 0 ¡""'!'1 i~~ ~ (':) gg ~[ ...... ¡..... ;:.') N ¡:u !""t "i I d-& E3 00 ~ ~rlÐ ...,.::s c+CD::S to I N ...,. ~5· ~ ~~ ~ I! to CD c+C'Ë1!~ ...,. ~ ~~ Þ-1CD c+ ~~ ~"itJj ...... , b::IH ~~ d- '" rJ P: ~ ::3 CD è+d- ~ !""t g ~o ~o ~~~ ~ ~§ ~(t) J t1 ""0 Þ-1 (':) ~ ö~ ~~ rD§ _ ""0 c+ :'.J ..... - a 8 CD ...,. ...,. ¡""'t1 ...... Þ-1 to~ 1-'00 gr ~~o ~ rt ~~~~ ~m C.) I .g~ f - H.q...,o ....,.ø. ~~~ Þ-1CD "!IgQ ~ø. ~ &~ 0 0Þ-1 CD~ I ::So ~H a.g=f)- ~~~m ~ ..... :j O§ 0\ (') rt - 0 ~~ 0 ::r' .1) ~d-§ è+~0"C+ 0 I-' ."1 \.0 ¡:u ~~ 00 ~HCDE3 ~ N ;:j f-I. CD d- 1-3Þ-10 è+ c+ C+~ W 0.. 1"1 ...,. cT s· H ::s CD CD ::S-(1) ""-J :1 <(1)~ (1)~ rt ~. (':) F1 c+;äg~ I ~~ b:I Þ-1(1) o ; <+~ ~ r~g¡ .? g ~ :.:s C+§ ~ J c+~ (':) Þ-1 d- ~! ~ c::: CD::S- ~ ~i <+ I -g ~ p;i Þ-1 ã:~~ ~~...... ...,. s~~ffi N CD o~~ ~tQ d- ~ i ...,. c+ - c+ Þ-1 c+ ...,. Þ-1 ~ I Þ-1 0 ~.g:ga ~ ~ ~ Þ-1 CD H)O CD :::s cT:::S~ffi to (1) OÞ-1- ::s d-(1) Þ-1 d- ::r 0 CD I ~ ~~~~ c+ ""0 to CD . < c+co:::s CD ~ CD""· ° ::s S- o H) OQ a l- I ~ I Ia I I t I I I I I , I I I I I I , I !--.- ~ FœM C RæOLUTION AUTHORI~ TRANSFm FUNDS I, Jc~n~~~e Rewis , Secretary of City of North Richland Hills , (the "CUSTOM:ER") Hereby cmTIFY that a meeting of the Board of Directors of the CUSTOMm, duly held on the --L1th. day of October , 19 ~ , at which a quorum was present and acting throughout, the following resolutions were adopted and said resolutions have not been rescinded, revoked, or modified and are still in full force and effect. WHmFAS, from time to time, the CUSTOMm verbally requests Texas Commerce Bank-Hurst, N. A. (the "Bank") to transfer funds to other banks or to other accounts at the Bank for credit to persons de- signated by the CUSTCMm in amounts not to exceed the collected balance on deposit with the Bank, in a manner which makes it in- convenient or impossible to execute prior written authorization, instructions or releases otherwise required b,y the Bank so that the Bank must have standing instructions upon which to act pur_ suant to verbal requests for the transfer of funds. NOW, THmEFœE, BE IT RæOLVED, that the officers of the CUSTCMER, listed below are hereby authorized to enter into and perform the Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" on behalf of the CUSTCMER with the Bank providing for requests for the transmission of fUnds belonging to the CUSTæm upon the terms and conditions set forth in said Agreement, and to delete and-appoint such persons, from time to time, who may request such transfers on behalf' of the CUSTOMm in accordance with such Agreement. The authori ty conferred herein may be exercised singly by any of such officers and shall continue in full force and effect until written notice of revocation shall be received by the Bank. I further CERTIFY that the office referred to in the fore~oing resolution is now held by the following whose signature(s) appears after his/her name: TITLE (Authorized Signature) TITLE (Authorized Signature) TITLE (Authorized Signature) IN WITNE3S WHmOOF, I have hereunto set ~ hand and seal of said CUSTCMm this day of , 19 S.&;RErARY (President to sign if Secretary is the author- ized signer) I ~ '- I FORM D OPmATING PROCEDURæ I All requests for Wire Transfers will be processed for same daa- delivery according to the following time frames: I Domestic International (Central Time) 9:00 AM to 12:00 noon 9:00 AM to 11:00 AM I All Wire Transfers of funds are subject to the following fees: I $10.00 per wire, incoming and outgoing Note: International Wire Transfers normally include an additional Telex and Commission fee. I I , I I I I I I ¡ I !a..- Source of Funds: I~Bonds (GO/Rev.) ~ I Operating Budget N/A ! ther~. N/A 'I ~ /770.-- þ ~ bE- Department Head Signature CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM I I r I I I I I , ~ - CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Finance 10/13/86 - Council Meeting Date: Subject: Paving Assessments - Davis Memorial un1ced Mecnod1SC Lnurcn GN 86-110 Agenda Number: The City of North Richland Hills on July 2, 1980 approved Ordinance NO. 833 levying assessments for Davis Blvd. from Grapevine Highway to Emerald Hills Way. Davis Memorial United Methodist Church located at 5301 Davis Blvd. was assessed $12,337.38 on May 4, 1982 after the project was completed and accepted by the City. Statements were sent annually to the Methodist Church with no response recognizing the liability. The current amount outstanding is $15,547.74 including accrued interest to September 30, 1986. The Church was in the process of preparing for a major expansion to the facilities and a request was made for a building permit. The Church Administrative Staff was informed at that time that no permit could be issued until the assessment lien was resolved by paying a prorated portion of the lien. According to State statutes "each individual property owner may pay the balance due in five equal installments plus accrue interest at 6% per annum': The City Staff and the Administrative Staff of the Church attempted to resolve the problem in a meeting held Tuesday, October 7, 1986. It was our proposition that if 4/5's of the current amount outstanding, or $12,438.19 were paid immediately with the balance due on or about May 24, 1987 that a permit could be issued. It is the contention of the Church that the amount will place a hardship on the Church and that a loan for the expansion cannot be obtained with another lien against the property. The Pastor and the Administrativ~ Staff have requested time to appear before the Council to request waiver of the accrued interest due. Conclusion: Assessments should be applied uniformly to all property owners that are being assessed. The City when placing the levy against the Methodist Church property assessed the property at the residential rate instead of the commercial front footage rate in an attempt to not place a burden on the C~urch. Recommendation: It is the Staff recommendation that the assessment amount plus accrued interest should be paid in full on or before May 24, 1987 or that 4/5's of the amount should be paid immediately with the balance due on May 24, 1987. Finance Review ~ Acct. Number N/A Sufficient Funds Avai lable -/ Kvn/~ City Manager , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 1* .. fe I I I I I I I " I I I I I I ~ I I DA VIS MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 5301 Davis Boulevard Fort Worth, Texas 76118 (817) 281,0411 October 8, 1986 Mr. Roger Line City Manager 7301 N.E. Loop 820 P.O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76180 Dear Mr. Line, I am writing you to request that our church be placed on the agenda for the City Council Meeting, Monday, October 13, 1986. I am also requesting that our church be allowed to appear before the Pre-Council at 6: 00 PM on the same evening. We will be appearing before the City Council to ask them to negate the paving assessment that has been given to our church. The present amount of the assessment is $15,~84.87. I thank you for considering this request to appear before the Council regarding this matter. I am looking forward to seeing you Monday. GDP/sdt Dr. G. Dean pos~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Police Subject: Council Meeting Date: 9-13-86 Establishing Fees for Record I s Documents and Research- Agenda Number: GN 86-111 Ordinance II 1410 Fees presently charged by the Police Department have fallen below those fees charged by other area police agencies and no longer cover actual cost to the City. These changes will enable the Police Department to recoup actual cost incurred by the City and remain consistant with other agencies. The Police Department currently charges $2.00 for one page accident reports, $3.00 for incident/offense reports and $5.00 per hour to research files. This proposed ordinance will increase the cost for accident and offense/incident reports to $4.00. regardless of number of pages, and $11.50 per hour for research of files. This is based on an average Clerk II salary at the overtime rate. Fingerprint cards will remain at $4.00 per card. This ordinance will replace Ordinance #1064 which was passed in September, 1983. Recommendation: Request passage of ordinance. I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) OperatJ.D~ Budget Other ' . 0'/?.q - f!-'U /~ partment Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Finance Review Acct. Number Sufficient Funds Available . Finance Director I Page 1 of . I -- I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I ORDINANCE 111410 .. WHEREAS, the charges levied by the City of North Richland Hills to defray certain cost incurred by the City have not been revised in some time, and; WHEREAS, the cost to the City of North Richland Hills has risen substantially during that time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City of ~rth Richland ~lls that charges for the various documents shall be levied in accordance with the following schedule: Accident Report $4.00 $4.00 Incident/Offense Report Fingerprints $4.00 - Per Card Research Fee/Computer/Microfilm $11.50 - Per Hour (1 hr. minimum) This ordinance shall supersede any prior ordinance or resolution setting fees for the above service. PASS AND APPROVED this 13th day of October , 1986 Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Administration Award of Bid for R.ecreatiun C~IlL~I./L.ibLäLY and Police Department Expansion 10/13/86 Council Meeting Date: GN 86-112 Agenda Number: ~ I Reference the attached letter from Albert S. Komatsu. On September 25, 1986 at 2:00 p.m. bids for the Recreation Center/Library and Police Station addition and alterations were opened. Due to the advantageous bidding climate, 14 general contractors submitted bids. The combined bids for the two projects, including all alternates (Public Auditorium) was $2,215,700. Our estimate for these two projects was $3,131,461 for a combined savings of $915,761. I ~ ~ I I lit I I I ~ I I , I " I I As a cost saving effort there were 41 items deleted from the plans for the Recreation Center/Library. We have asked the architect to estimate the cost for these items and if possible they will be included on one Change Order. In the allocation of funds listed below we are requesting an additional $75,000 to cover the anticipated costs of the proposed change order which will be submitted for the Council's consideration. Funding of the Police building is covered as a separate agenda item. Recreation Center/Library Current Funding Revised Funding Current 1985 Series GO Bond Funds available Park Bond Funds (Transferred 1/13/86) Park & Library Funds (Donations from Utility Customers) 1985-86 Budget Savings Unspecified ClP Building Funds Anticipated Interest Income Total Available $734,380 153,257 $ 734,380 153,257 30,000 600,000 115,286 8,500 $1,641,423 30,000 170,561 115,286 8,500 $1,211,986 Proposed Revised Budget Construction Architects/Engineering Future Proposed Change Order $1,021,700 115,286 75,000 $1,211,986 Recommendation: It is recommended that the combined bid be awarded to Calvin Baker and T.W. Gilmore Joint Venture in the amount of $2,215,700. It is also recommended that the proposed revised budget for the Recreation Center/Library be approved as outlined above. x-- Finance Review Acct. Number See Above Sufficient Funds Available Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other ~1f1/~ Department Head Signature ' City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I f I KOMATSU ALBERT S. KOMATSU a ASSOCIATES. INC. October 7, 1986 Mr. Dennis Horvath Asst. City Manager City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: Public Library and Recreation Center ASK Project No. 1397 Police Station Additions and Alterations ASK Project No. 1398 Dear Mr. Horvath: We recommend that the City of North Ri chl and Hi 11 s award the contract for construction of the above referenced projects to T. W. Gilmore Construction Co. and Calvin Baker Construction Co., a full Joint Venture. Based on the bids received and read publically at 2 p.m., September 25, 1986, this joint venture presented the low bid for the "combined base bid" category and we feel the City will benefit from having a single contractor build both projects. We also recommend that the City accept alternates AI, A2, and B1, and reject alternates A3, A4, and B2, bringing the total to $2,215,700.00. Through the Wm. Ri gg Co. in Fort Worth, I have veri fi ed that the bondi ng com- pany, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, is certified to do business in the State of Texas as well as nationwide. We do advise that the City consult legal counsel regarding the bid bond. Both contractors are known to our firm, but we have not had experience with them operating as "a full joint venturell per the bid bond. The City might wish to have further documentat i on presented as to the joi nt venture agreement ; tse 1 f and advise you seek legal couns~.l. We have their independent qualification statements on file, including financial statements, should you wish to review them. We look forward to working with this contractor and the City as we move into the construction phase of the project. Thank you. Bt~t~~ ~ Gupton, AlA ~ TBG/MKM: dl cc: Mike Morris Albert Komatsu File/1397.8 1397.2.1 ARCHITECTS· ENGINEERS· INTERIOR DESIGNERS P.O. BOX 2079 FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76113·817/332-1914· ~ETRO 429-7463 Ie CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS I ~epartment: Subject: I I Administration . . . 10/13/86 Council Meeting Date: Allocation of Funds for Completion of Fire Facilities A d N b GN 86-113 gen a urn er: Phillips . Swager Associates are 75% complete with the plans and specifications for the new Fire Station #4 and Administration Building/Training Center and Training Tower at the Watauga Road site. The estimated cost of construction, furnishings and landscaping is $1,759,120 (see attached summary). Proposed financing is as follows: Available GO Bond Funds Utility CIP Funds (Utility Work) 1985-86 Budget Savings * $1,555,000 35,800 168,320 $1,759,120 *A portion of the sum previously allocated for Recreation Center/Library move-in costs. I Recommendation: It is recommended that the $168,320 previously allocated to the Recreation Center/Library facilities be reallocated to the Fire Facilities located at the Municipal Complex property on Watauga Road. I I Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget Other GO/REV Finance Review Acct. Number See Above Sufficient Funds Available I I Department Head Signature ¡R 1fIl/~ City Manager . Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I, Ie· I I I I I I I tt I I II I I I ~ I I PHILLIPS SWAGER ASSOCIATES INC. 13747 Montfort Drive, Suite 106 Dallas, Texas 75240 FIRE STATION NO. 4 ADMINISTRATION AND TRAINING FACILITY NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS COST ANALYSIS UPDATE: I. Base Bid: A. Fire Station/Administration/Training: 20,555 sf @ $51.30 sf = B. Training Tower c. Site Development D. Total Base Bid II. Alternate Bids: A. Casework B. Drives C. Fence D. Site Utilities E. Total Alternate Bids III. Total Construction Cost IV. Architectural/Engineering Fee V. Reimbursable VI. Estimated Owner Costs: A. Landscaping B. Furniture and Equipment C. Construction Materials Testing D. Reproduction of Bid Documents E. Contingency VII. Total Project Cost October 7, 1986 $1,054,520 161,000 213,800 $1,429,400 18,850 50,320 44,500 35,800 $1,578,870 $1,578,870 95,250 8,000 15,000 40,000 8,500 3,500 10,000 $77,000 $1,759,120 I I I I I I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Administration Subject: Police Department Addition and Alteration 10/13/86 Council Meeting Date: Agenda Number: GN 86-114 On Septe~ber 25, 1986 at 2:00 p.m. bids were open for the Police Department addition and alterations. The low bid for the Police Department was $1,208,000. Our estimate cost for this project was $1,867,117. Funds allocated for this project are restricted and can not be reallocated to projects other than Police facilities. Several major items in the Police Department plans were deleted as a cost saving effort. One of these items includes resurfacing the entire parking lot around City Hall with concrete. We also anticipate major remodeling costs in the old Police wing of City Hall. We are now in the process of combining an estimated cost of all items so that they may be included in this project. We will present these items to the City Council at a later time in the form of a proposed Change Order. Proposed Funding: I Total GO Bonds available $1,900,000 Proposed Expenditures Construction Architects/Engineering Future Proposed Change Orders $1,208,000 300,000 392,000 $1,900,000 Recommendation: Approve allocation of funds as outlined above for construction of Police facility. Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) Operating Budget e Other GO Finance Review Acct. Number See Above Sufficient Funds Available 12 tflci~ Department Head Signature City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM , Finance Director Paqe 1 of 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Parks and Recreation Department Council Meeting Date: 10/13/86 Agenda Number: GN 86-115 NRG Softball Association Proposed Building North Richland Girls Softball Association approached the Parks and Recreation Board on October 1, 1986 with plans for a restroom and meeting hall (20' x 55') to be erected at Fossil Creek Park. Since this item was not on the Park Board Agenda, the Board gave a consensus opinion in which they showed no objection to the construction of this building with the condition that the building complies with all city building codes and if such construction by a private organization on public land is legal. The North Richland Girls Softball Association has also asked for assistance from the City in the funding for this construction project in the amount of $4,000.00. The estimated value of the entire building will be approximately $40,000.00. Funding Source: Although funds were not specifically budgeted in the Parks and Recreation Department Budget for this request, sufficient funds are available in Reserve for Contingency Account Number 01-99-01-5970. Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve this request and appropriate $4,000.00 from the Reserve for Contingency to the Parks and Recreation Department Account Number 01-70-02-6200. Finance Review Source of Funds: Acct. Number See Above Bonds (GO/Rev.) SUffiCi&nt unds Available Operating Budget -Å- _ ~ ~ . _atger ~ _ //{~ .-/ ~~-- /121/1. ~ Department Head SignatUre-- CI y Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM . Fmance Director Page 1 of 1 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: .Ubject: Purchasing Award Concracc for IBM Compucer !xpans1on Components, Resolution No. 86-43 . . 10/13/86 Council Meeting Date: PU 86-26 Agenda Number: The City þas budgeted $139,505 for the purchase of components for expansion of the IBM computer system. Allocated for the B-36 computer components for the Library is $64,300.00. There is an immediate requirement existing for this equipment to support library operations. Bids were obtained from (1) IBM and (2) Municipal Software. The two bids were identical and are outlined below: 5360-B24 256K, 400 MB Magazine Diskette 256K Additional Storage 4900 Work Station Expansion Display Station 2 each @ $906.50 System Software $38,570.00 875.00 1,400.00 1,813.00 4,270.00 $46,928.00 3196-BIO The cost of the system is the same from both bidders, IBM and Municipal Software. Mr. Johnson of Municipal Software is a Trade Remarketer for IBM, allowing him to sell to North Richland Hills at the same price. In addition to this he is, and has been for the past four years, our Computer Consultant providing programing support and equipment for our two present IBM systems, thus allowing the City more indepth support for our system. Recommendation: Approve the purchase of IBM 36 System from Municipal Software in the amount of $46,928.00 and the remaining expansion material from IBM by passing the attached resolution. Finance Review Acct. Number 1986/87 Operating Budget SUfficienæ Ava~ / / / ~ 1:V wr" . ~ance Director 1<41/'2-- City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION IrEM Page 1 of 1 I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I RESOLUTION NO. 86-43 A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF AN IBM SYSTEM/36 COMPUTER AND DISPLAY UNITS; FINDING THAT AN EMERGENCY AND URGENT PUBLIC NECESSITY EXISTS THAT NECESSITATES THE PURCHASE OF SUBJECT EQUIPMENT IS COMPATIBLE FROM AN ECONOMIC AND REALISTIC STANDPOINT TO BE IMPROVED UPON AND MODIFIED BY THIS SUBJECT EQUIPMENT DUE TO ITS UNIQUE CHARACTERISTICS: FINDING THAT THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT AS BID IS THE LOWEST COMPETITIVE PRICE IN THE MARKET PLACE FOR THIS TYPE OF EQUIPMENT; FINDING THAT THE SAVINGS TO THE CITY AND ITS TAXPAYERS ARE SUBSTANTIAL; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, in November 1983 the City authorized and did purchase an additional IBM System/36 Computer to upgrade our computer system; and WHEREAS, the City's needs for this type of equipment have increased dramatically and it is necessary to expand the system capabilities to meet the ongoing and ever increasing needs of the City's citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Staff that works with the computer system daily and has experienced the problems brought about as a result of the rapid growth has concluded that the needs of the City created an emergency condition and an urgent public necessity to immediately purchase equipment to expand the system and t~e City Council so agrees and finds; and WHEREAS, the IBM System/36 Computer is the logical migration path for the City due to its cost, its capacity, its speed and the fact that the IBM System/36 is directly compatible with the City's present System/36 Computer and IBM 8809 Tape Drive and present Display Stations which will eliminate any conversion and/or modification; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the said IBM System/36 Computer has unique characteristics that are not found in other equipment in so far as a conversion is concerned; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the sales price bid by Municipal Software for the IBM System/36 and Display Stations with all attachments is the lowest and best bid available in the market place and the City, its citizens and its taxpayers savings are substantial. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of North Richland Hills: Section 1. That all of the statements contained in the preamble are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein as if copied in their entirety in the body of this resolution. Section 2. That the City Council does hereby find based on the above recited facts, that all competitive bidding requirements of State Law have been duly and reasonably satisfied and that the bid of Municipal Software for an IBM System/36 which system is described in detail in the I Ie I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I f I Resolution No. 86-43 Page 2 bid proposal which proposed is incorporated by reference into the body of this resolution the lowest and best bid and that the City does hereby award a contract to Municipal Software for the following amount: One each 5360-B24 and two 3196-B10 in the amount of $46,928.00. Section 3. The City Council further authorizes the purchase of the balance of the expansion of the IBM computer systems from IBM as it can be delivered during the fiscal year for a maximum cost of $92,577.00. PASSED AND APPROVED this 13th day of October, 1986. Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Attorney I Ie I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I DEPARTMENT Finance CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS COMPUTER EQUIPMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1986/87 DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT 1. Purchase of two - IBM5224 Printer (240LPM) 2. Terminal 1 each IBM4291 Model II Planning & Development Library Police Fire Department 1. Printer for IBM/AT 1. Computer equipment funded for Library & Recreation facilities move-in cost to include System/36 Terminals, . Tape Drive, D/C Computer, Printer 1. 2 each Printers for IBM D/C Computer, IBM or equivalent 2. System/36 Memory Expansion fir 3. 1 each 1200 Band External Modem for use with IBM Pic AT 4. 1 each IBM Model 2, 5224 Printer 5. 2 each IBM Pic AT Personal Computer with associated hardware 6. 5 each IBM 3169 Color Display Stations 7. IBM Personal Computer AT with associated expansion and enhancement equipment 1. IBM System/36 Mini-System with associated IBM system software and expansion hardware Total IBM EST. COST $ 9,900 . 1,035 1,500 64,300 3,200 2,500 630 7,000 12,400 11,000 6,500 19,540 $139,505 CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Purchasing Department: Office Supplies - Award contract tu General Office Supply 10-13-86 Council Meeting Date: Subject: Agenda Number: PU 86-27 On September 25, 1986 at 10:00 A.M. bids for the above mentioned items were opened and the results are outlined below: Vendor Exceptions Amount of Discount Paul Tarver Office Supply Central Office Supply Trinity Office Supply Maddock Office Supply E.L. White Office Supply *General Office Supply o o o o 1 o 25% N-30 36% N-30 41% N-10 41% N-20 41% N-30 40% Less 3% - 5 2% - 10 1% - 15 I This contract will be for City-Wide office supplies, copy machine supplies and word-processing supplies. orty percent (40%) plus three percent (3%) in five days represents a discount on all tems in the office supply line (approximately 30,000) and not a limited few high use items. Office furniture and machines are bid on a individual basis. Recommendation: Approve awarding *General Office Supply a one year contract for the purchase of office supplies. Finance Review Acct. Number 01-00-00-0705 SU~dS Available S ~ /l ~, FonanceD"ector ¡ell~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I . \ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TEXAS I ~tar óf the Metroplex INVITATION TO BID AND BID QUOTATION FORM I VENDOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS "' SHOW THIS INFORMATION ON ENVELOPE: General 'Office Supply Request For: Office Supply Contract II 300 W. Pipeline Rd. Bid Opening Date: September 25, 1986 at 10:00 a.m. CST Hurst, Texas 76053 Date: Attn: Pat Ingram Requisition No. II Sealed bids will be received until 10: 00 a. m. September 25, 1986 City of North Richland Hills, P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 ATTN: City Secretary Phone: (817) 281-0041 liTEM DESCR IPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL II I ~ - I fIi li tt ... ~ i :f f SUB-TOT AL ALL BIDS MUST BE EXTENDED AND TOTALED BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED. TOTAL BID ~ j ~(/ ~ TERMS ;LtI/o % /0 __ DAYS, F.O.B. CITY OF NORTH IHlAND KfllS: Dd~~ERY IN 4SIf£r¿. DAYS FROM EIPT OF ORDER. The City of North Rictìland Hills Purchas- I Dept. reserves the right to reject any or all bids, waive formal;- o award purchases on an individual item basis when in its rests. ALL SALES AND USE TAXES TO BE EXCLUD- FROM BID. PRICES TO BE QUOTED F.O.B. CITY OF TH RICH LAND HILLS, TEXAS. I IN SUBMITTING THI~ BID, VENDOR AGREES THAT AC- ,CEPTANCE OF ANY OR ALL QUOTATIONS BY THE PUR- CHASING DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF NORTH RICH- LAND HILLS WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD CONS'- TUTES A BINDING CONTRACT. COMPANY: General Office BY: Norman Parke PHONENU 282-2711 SIGNATU E: iH IS IS !'JOTA PURCHASE ORDER I I. . I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I I- I The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, on the terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general conditions, and the specifications and any other conditions attached hereto the following: Annual contract for Office Supplies per City of North Richland Hills Specifications (In sections 3 through 7 write yes or no) 1. Manufacture's list price less what % of Discount (Excluding Furniture) ~¿/ % 2. Terms s% S- .t?d¡Y,) d/~ /0 / ", , J~ /J / ~ I / ~ - 3. Vendor shall have the capabilities of delivery. Item's ---=- placed before 9:00 A.M. must be delivered before 4:00 P.M. of the same day. v r,s ;/ ~ 4. Vendor shall have the capabilities for Emergency deliveries. (Example: an item placed on order at 10:00 A.M. must be delivered by 12:00 noon of the same day). '(F '-') ~-= -- - I- I · .. I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I Ie I 5. Vendor shall accept orders by manufactures name and product number only, without the assistance of additional codes or computer numbers! (Example: A box of Smead 153L File Folders will be ordered in that manner) y~'s r 6. Vendor shall submit an Invoice with order and delivery. ~£(') 7. Vendor shall have open accounts with local wholesalers, McKesson Stationers Dist., S.P. Richards, United Stationers. General Office SupDlv Company Name By President Name and Title ~ I" The undersigned hereby offers to sell to the City of North Richland Hills, !In tqe terms and conditions contained in this proposal, the general Îi~itions and the specifications and any other conditions that may be IIttached and. further certify that our attached proposal submitted by II (a) General Office Sueply complies with all the specifications as outlined in the city of North Richland Hills bid specification. Be it ~rther specified that any non-compliance with the City of North Richland Hills specifications will be fully outlined in detail stating said vendors I (b) No exceptions. Id further understand that the City of North Richland Hills' acceptance of any proposal from any vendor is only with the expressed understanding that ~e City of North Richland Hills has full right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any part thereof. I . Company Name General Office Supply I By President I I Ti tIe , I I Date Sept. 24, 1986 I // ,/ --- THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED ''¡ITH VENDOR QUOTATION ·,Idor ~ote: I (a) *-) I I Type or write in Company Name Type or write in Number of Exceptions, if none, so state "NO" --...... .. ~ CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS PURCHASING 10-13-86 Department: R.ejectlull of bids [or lots 14, IS, 16. Briarwood Estates ubject: Council Meeting Date: PU 86-28 Agenda Number: I On September 26, 1986 at 10:00 A.M. bids were opened for the purchase of lots 14, 15, 16 Briarwood Estates, Block 2. The results are outlined below: Bidder Charles Worley Jr. Amount Offered $11,000 for lots 14 & 15 1,373 for lot 14 1,296 for lot 15 20,335 for lot 16 Alternate bid 25,000 for lots 14, 15 & 16 30,100 for lots 14, 15 & 16 H.T. Johnson Gran T. Stem The above mentioned property has been *appraised by Mr. John Lutz of John Lutz Realty Company on July 21, 1986. Mr. Lutz appraisal is outlined below: 14 Land Only $15,000 at 15 Land Only $15,000 Lot 16 Land and Home $75,000 *Copy attached Recommendation: Reject all bids for the purchase of Lots 14, 15 & 16 and hold the above mentioned property until market conditions improve. , Finance Review wEt ~,-- Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) _ Operating Bud¡ et ., Other --- , Finance Director I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I I e I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I I" I OlD RtA;.iC:R · METRO (817) 498-3908 METRO (817) 589-0550 METRO (8il) 268-1285 LUTZ REALTY COMPANY' ----------- R£AL ESTATE - S....LES - INV£5T~ENr6 - caUNBt:L IND R£AL ESTATE APPR~IBAL SERViCE ..~-_._------ ----------.- .._~---_..-... --.--..------....- ~ 4 25 0 A V IS B: . \j I~). FT. \~/O R T H, T E :..( /... (; / (, j 1 n July 21, 1986 Mr. John Whitney Purchasing Þigent City of North Richland Hills, Texas 7301 Northeast Loop 820 (U.S.) Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Dear Mr. ~hitney, At your request, this firm has apprD.L:cd the property located at t11e Soutrl\AJest. quadrant of t11C i.l1tcr::":~.~ctioll of Sruitl1fi.eldRoad and Hightower , North Richland lIil.ls, Texas, and being legally described as Lots 14, 15 and 16, Block 2, ßriarwood Estates, an add it ion to the City of North Rich1é.md Hills, Tarrant County, Texas. A personal inspection of the premises has been completed and the report herewith is a result. . After considering all the information obtained, an analysis of the subject property, the neighborhood and the general area was made. Considering the purpose of this appraisal, which is to estimate the current market value of the residential building situated on Lot 16, and estimate the market value of each lot 14 and 15 as separate properties. The estimated Market Value of the properties under appraisement as of July 21, 1986, is: Lot 16 (with i~rovements) = $ 75,000.00 Lot 15 ( Land Only) - $ 15,000.00 Lot 14 (Land Only) = $ 15,000.00 The enclosed report is presneted as substantiation for the values stated above. Sincerely, Þ: "' r T .... ..J. .A~ , \ . ;.\. .p I) iOS ~l J.~3 (~ 1" LRC:do Ene. : report I ' · I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works Council Meeting Date: 10-13-86 PW 86-26 Agenda Number: Railroad Crossing at Smithfield Road and St. Louis Southwestern Railway I Several years ago the City of North Richland Hills requested that the railroad crossing at Smithfiel-d Road be upgraded with full "signals and a new roadbed crossing. This crossing was approved by the State to be rebuilt and it required that the City participate in the amount of 10% of the total cost and that the rnilroad would participate 10% of the total cost. The federal government would participate 80% of the total cost through the state. I I , , , ~ I I I I The state has requested that we escrow our $10,500 for this construction with them at this time. It is the staff's understanding at this time that it will be approximately nine months before this crossing will be constructed. Funding Source: Sufficient funds are available in the Unspecified CIP account and it is recommended that funds be allocated as follows: From: 13-00-99-6150 $10,500 To: 13-00-87-6150 $10,500 Recommendation: The staff recommends approval to appropriate $10,500 as the City's portion of the construction of the railroad crossing at Smithfield Road. I I Source of Funds: ~ Bonds (GO/Rev.) egi~;~tinL- n~ ~ Department Head Signature I Finance Review GO Acct. Number 13-00-87-6150 SUffi&ndS Available , Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITEM Page 1 of 1 I -- I I ROBERT C. lANIER, CHAIRMAN ROBERT M. BASS RAY STOKER, JR. I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION P. O. Box 6868 Fort Worth, Texas 76115 September 15, 1986 COMMISSION _e_ ENGINEER-DIRECTOR MARK G. GOODE _e_ 1986 City-County Grade Crossing Protection Program Project GRP 8606-2-6 SLSW & Smithfield Road in North Richland Hills Tarrant County - DOT No. 789 722N Mr. Rodger Line City Manager City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Attention: Mr. Gene Riddle Dear Sir: Please execute the attached Title Sheet for the above listed project and return to this office. It is also necessary for the City of North Richland Hills to forward their check for $10,500.00 for the City's 10% participation. Please make your check payable to State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. The project will be held in abeyance until these funds have been sent to our Austin office. CRC:am Attachment Yours very truly, Engineer 18~~&\1986 ~S1,", I- , CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Public Works Council Meeting Date: 10-13-86 Agenda Number: PW 86-27 Change Order #5, Chapman Drive Paving and Drainage Improvements, North Forty Road North Forty Road in Morgan Meadows was scheduled to have borrow ditches on each side of the roadway during the construction of Morgan Meadows East drainage facilities. However, it has been determined that these borrow ditches would have to be constructed too close to the roadway and would cause hazardous vehicular travel on this road. This was discussed in a CIP Committee meeting and it was decided to recommend approval of a change order to the APAC-Texas, Inc. contract on Chapman Drive to construct a storm drain in North Forty Road and to repave the road after completion of the storm drain. A change order in the amount of $109,847.83 for this project has been negotiated based on Chapman road unit prices, which were considered to be advantageous. Funds are available in the CIP Unspecified Projects account for this project. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ Reconnnendation: It is recommended that Change Order #5 to the APAC-Texas, Inc. Chapman Road contract be approved for the purpose of constructing a storm drain and repaving a portion of North Forty Road; and that a transfer in the amount of $120,000 from Unspecified Projects be approved to finance the change order plus engineering and contingency. Finance Review I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITE . Finance Director Page 1 of 1 I -- I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I_ I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS / Fort Worth- Dallas September 26, 1986 ~ Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 RE: 3-334, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS CHAPMAN DRIVE PAVING AND DRAINAGE It1PVTS., NORTH FORTY ROAD, CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 Enclosed is Change Order No.5 to the referenced project which has been executed by the Contractor and which covers the cost of constructing storm drainage and paving improvements on North Forty Road between the box culvert and t1eadow Creek Road. Please place this item on the next Council agenda for Council consideration and approval of this change order. Upon Council approval, the Contractor will be directed to proceed with this construction based on the pay items presented on the attached change order form. We will be available at the next Council meeting (October 13, 1986) to answer any questions which you may have concerning this change order. {j¡, ... R~JA/ra Enclosures cc: r~r. Rodger N. Line, City r·1anager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Mr. Don Oietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector APAC-TEXAS, Inc. 1901 CENTRAL DR., SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METRO/267-3367 I CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS Department: Public Works ubject: Pay Estimate #11 and Final. Morgan Meadows East Drainage Improvements Council Meeting Date: 10-13-Hh PAY 86-21 Agenda Number: I ~ The Morgan Meadows East drainage channel is complete at this time and the contractor has requested h~s final payment. His request was approximately $800' more than the $30,000 we are recommending. The $30,000 figure is a negotiated amount. Even though this job took a year and a half to complete, it is a good job and should take care of the flooding in Morgan Meadows Subdivision and other areas nearby. Funding Source: ~ ~ Sufficient funds were originally appropriated for the original contract amount plus a contingency amount to compensate for as built qualities and change orders that might become necessary. Recommendation: The staff recommends approval of payment to LCH Construction Company in the amount of $30,000. ~ ~ Finance Review Source of Funds: Bonds (GO/Rev.) .a O.perating Budget =- Other I Jj JIYu PdÆJ Department Head Signature I CITY COUNCIL ACTION ITE ~ Acct. Number 13-00-61-6150 Sufficient Funds Available I Finance Director 1 Page 1 of I -- I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I KNOWL TON-E NGLlSH-FLOWERS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I Fort Worth- Dallas October 7, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Counci} City of North Richland Hills 7301 N.E. Loop 820 North Richland Hills, Texas 76118 Re: 3-317, CITY OF NORTH RICHLAND HILLS MORGAN MEADOWS EAST DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WATER, SEWER, PAVING, & DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION CONTR. PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 11 & FINAL Enclosed is one copy of Contractor's Partial Pay Estimate No. 11 & Final, dated July 25, 1986, made payable to LCH Construction Company, in the amount of $30,000.00, for materials furnished and work performed on the referenced project as of July 7, 1986. The quantities and condition of the project have been verified on-site by your representatives, Floyd McCallum and Larry' Jones, as indicated by signature on the estimate, and we have checked the item extensions and additions. This project includes drainage channel construction in the Morgan Meadows Addition from Chapman to Hightower. Also included are· minor roadside drainage ditch work on North Forty and Hightower Drive and concrete work on the Walker Branch Channel. The total contract amount, including change orders, based on original estimated quantities of construction, totals $893,843.51. The total contractor earnings, based on actual verified - as-built quantities totals $907,892.11, which is $14,048.60 over the contract amount. The attached Construction Project Status Report accounts for the differences in estimated and actual as-built costs for each pay item. In accordance with Section 3.2.11(a) of the Contract, the two (2) year term of maintenance will begin on this date, and therefore, will terminate on October 7, 1988. The maintenance obligation includes repair of all water line leaks and malfunctions of all valves, including repair of all sewer breaks or stoppage, and malfunctions of other equipment furnished and installed under this contract. The maintenance obligation also includes sealing of pavement cracks, repair of pavement buckling or other failures, along with failure of all concrete flatwork and other concrete structures. Continued 1901 CENTRAL DR,. SUITE 550 · BEDFORD, TEXAS 76021 . 817/283-6211 . METROj267-3367 ",' I '- I I ,I I I I I . I I I I I I I Ie I October 7, 1986 MORGAN MEADOWS EAST FINAL ESTIM. 2 Page The Contract Completion Time was 400 Calenday Days, including change orders, plus an additional 62 days added due to delays caused by other . utility companies, (see attached correspondence). Since the project was substantially complete within the 462 day period, we would not recommend assessment of liquidated damages. In the absence of any outstanding legitimate claims against this contractor from sub-contractors, suppliers, or adjacent property owners, in accordance with the provisions of items 3.12 and 3.13 on page G-6 of the "General Conditions" of the Contract, we would recommend that the total final payment, in amount of $30,000.00, be made to LCH Construction Company, 5001 Saunders, Fort Worth, Texas 76119. We will be present at the next Council Meeting to answer any questions you may have concerning this project. - (j)~ ~ RWA:bvg Enclosures cc: Mr. Rodger N. Line, City Manager Mr. Dennis Horvath, Assistant City Manager Mr. Gene Riddle, Director of Public Works Mr. Don Dietrich, Assistant Director of Public Works Mr. Floyd McCallum, City Inspector Mr. Larry Jones, City. Inspector Mr. Lee Maness, Director of Finance Mr. Lynn Henry, LCH Construction Co. 1-- '- I I I I I I I -- I I I I I I I Ie I Parish Homes 5505-8 Davis Blvd. Ft. Worth, TX 76118 Metro 577-2447 September 8, 1986 ~ Mr. Roger Lyons City of North Richland Hills P. O. Box 18609 North Richland Hills, TX 76118 Dear Mr. Lyons, /'" Parish Homes has been experiencing difficulty in advertising their property for sale because of the current administration of the sign ordinance. I would like to address the City Council at the meeting scheduled for h.,L¿ffi8~Y 77.Fd in regards to this ordinance. ~cf /3.rJ¡, pJ} ¥ ft1 V ¡J~ Jzr ()¥'\ c¡ I~kt ~Jt1~ CP /jw